The URL can be used to link to this page

2001-01-23PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 2001 7:30 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. o OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PAGE APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS *CONSENT AGENDA *A. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 5171-5199 *B. APPROVE SETTING PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. CASE #01-01: POST OFFICE DEVELOPMENT REZONING B-1 TO DESTINATION PUD - CITY OF MOUND: FEB 13, 2001 o CASE #01-04: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT POST OFFICE DEVELOPMENT - CITY OF MOUND: FEB 13,2001 COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.) PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CASE #00-64: PRELIMINARY PLAT - METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT - NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD BLVD AND COMMERCE BLVD 5200-5341 Bo CASE #00- 65: CUP AND VARIANCES METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT - NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD BLVD AND COMMERCE BLVD Co CASE #00-71 (CONTINUATION): STREET/EASEMENT VACATION - METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT - NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD BLVD AND COMMERCE BLVD PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. WESTEDGE BOULEVARD A. APPROVE PLANS FOR SOUTH ROAD EXTENSION B. FINAL REVIEW OF JOINT AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF MINNETRISTA 5342-5353 5354-5363 CONSIDERATION/ACTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #89-139 RESOLUTION APPROVING A POLICY ON APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY COMMISSIONS 5364-5369 o CONSIDERATION/ACTION AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 155 - THE COUNCIL 5370-5390 10. 2001 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS A. PLANNING COMMISSION B. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION C. DOCKS AND COMMONS COMMISSION D. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION 5391-5394 5395-5399 5400-5404 5405-5431 11. OTHER APPOINTMENTS A. WEED iNSPECTOR, DELEGATED BY MAYOR TO PARK DIRECTOR JIM FACKLER B. HENNEPIN COUNTY WELFARE TO WORK EXECUTIVE POLICY COMMITTEE 5432-5433 12. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. LMC Friday Fax 5434-5436 B. Westonka Schools communication 5437-5439 C. FYI: Thanks to Public Works Department 5440 D. LMCD communication 5441-5450 E. Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative communication 5451-5454 F. Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting 5455-5456 13. ADJOURN This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. cityofmound, com. 2 COUNCIL BRIEFING January 23, 2001 Pictures, Pictures! and John Dean are reminded to come dressed for pictures on January 23. Please be present at 6:00 You are encouraged to wear darker colors and refrain from prints, if possible. Thanks! #3.B. Post Office Public Hearings Only if things proceed according to course at the Jan 22 Planning Commission meeting will these two items remain on this agenda. If proper approvals are not achieved, these item(s) could be pulled. The report at the HRA meeting will tell all. #5. MetroPlains Applications MetroPlains Development is expecting to close before next Tues on the residential house owned by the School District. MetroPlains' attorneys claim they have a foolproof option agreement with the second residential landowner that ensures that purchase. (Word was received of that party's change of heart to sell.) Larry Olson presented at the Collaborative Meeting today, to which the community was invited. There was overwhelming support for the project, including that voiced by representatives of Mound Evangelical Free Church. #6. Westedge Boulevard & Langdon Bay Development Parties representing all sides were present at a City of Minnetrista workshop last Tues evening, where Council members gave their nod to the plans and the agreement. John Dean will describe some inconsequential changes to the agreement Mound Council approved. Minnetrista Council, which also includes two new members, was elated at this culmination of events and look forward to future cooperative ventures. Really!! #10. 2001 Committee Appointments ;member the Planning Commission interviews on Monday, Jan 22. Due to the timing of events, the ommendation for appointment to the Planning Commission will be received at the meeting. #12.F. Certificate of Achievement for Finance Geno should be congratulated for his efforts when you see him. There will be a public award of the certificate when it arrives. Human Resources Update A new Planning and Inspections secretary should be in place in mid-Feb. The candidate has related municipal experience. Background checks are underway. A former City Clerk has inquired about assisting the City in that capacity, which will be explored this 'week. The research portion of the reorganization and the process to hire a Community Development Director is underway. A search consultant will be hired within the next two weeks. The search can take place simultaneous with the restructuring process. The job opportunity for the new Parks Maintenance person will first be offered internally and will be filled in time for spring. Have a great day!! PAYMENT BILLS DATE: JANUARY 23, 2001 BILLS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BATCI 1 # #1011 #1012 AMOUNT $157,366.33 $174,582.63 TOTAL BILLS $331,948.96 PAGE 1 P U R C H A S E J O U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD P~E. NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER Al A0333 001231 179.26 THRU 12-31-00 GAS CHARGES 73-7300-2210 1/16/0i 1/16/01 179.26 JRNL-CD 1010 AMOCO OIL COMmANY VENDOR TOTAL 179.26 A0350 127319 50.00 LARSON, BERT FUNERAL 01-4020-4100 1/16/01 1/16/01 50.00 JRNL-CD lOlO .ANTHONYS FLORAL . VENDOR TOTAL 50.QO '' A0401 559301 167.25 MOTOR 01-4280-3810 1/16/01 1/16/01 167.25 JRNL-CD lOlO ASPEN EQUIPMENT VENDOR TOTAL 167.25 A0403 00122~-A 42.10 SHIRTS WITH CITY LOGO 01-4090-2240 12.87 SHIRTS WITH CITY LOGO 01-4280-2240 12.87 SHIRTS WITH CITY LOGO 73-7300-2240 12.86 SHIRTS WIT~ CITY LOGO 78-7800-2240 42.85 SHIRTS ~ITH CITY LOGO 01-4090-2240 61.00 SHIRTS WITH CITY LOGO 01-4040-2240 3.34 JACKET EMBROIDERY SKINNER 01-4280-2240 3.33 JACKET EMBROIDERY SKINNER 73-7300-2240 3.33 JACKET EMBROIDERY SKINNER 78-7800-2240 001228-B 1/16/01 1/lb/O1 194.55 JRNL-CD 1010 148.50 SHIRTS WITH CITY LOGO 01-4140-2240 1/16/01 1/16/O! 148.50 JRNL-CD 1010 ASPEN ~HBROIDERY & DESIGN VENDOR TOTAL 3~3.05 B0549 20423220 5,9~0.55 LIQUOR 1/16/01 1/16/01. 5,940.55 JRNL-CD 71-7100-9510 1010 BELLBOY CORPORATION VENDOR TOTAL 5940.55 B0600 10069925 31.66 11-00 GARBAGE PICKUP CMR0120 01-4280-3750 31.o6 11-00 GARBAGE PICKUP CMR0120 73-7300-3750 31.67 11-00 GARBAGE PICKUP EMRO120 78-7800-3750 10069926 1/16/01 1/16/01 94.99 JRNL-CD 1010 67.01 11-00 GARBAGE PICKUP CMRO121 22-4170-3750 10069980 1/16/01 1/16/01 67.01 JR~L-CD 1010 78.90 11-00 GARBAGE PICKUP CMR030B 01-4340-3750 1/16/01 1/16/01 75.90 JRNL-CD 1010 1070280 78.90 12-00 GARBAGE PICKUP CMR030B 01-4340-3750 1/16/01 1/16/01 78.90 JRNL-CD 1010 10070153 17.76 12-00 GARBAGE PICKUP CHPOO85 71-7100-3750 1/16/01 1/16/01 17.76 JRNL-CD 1010 10070225 31.66 12-00 GAREAGE PICKUP eMRO120 01-4280-3750 31.~6 12-00 GARgAGE PICKUP EMRO120 73-7300-3750 31.~7 12-00 GARBAGE PICKUP CMR0120 78-7800-3750 PAGE 2 P U R C H A S E J O U R N A L AP-CO2-O1 CiTY OF MOUNU VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD PRE- NO. II~VOICE N~R DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER A 1/16/01 1/16/01 94.99 JRNL-CD 1010 10070226 67.01 12-00 GARBAGE PICKUP #CMRO121 22-4170-3750 1/16/01 1/16/01 67.01 JRNL-CD 1010 5LACKOWIAK AND 50N VENDOR TOTAL 499.56 ~0611 001130 532.38-11-00 SAND FOR SALT MIX 01-4280-2540 1/16/01 1/16/01 532.38 JRNL-CD 1010 001231 2,039.60 12-00 SAND FOR SALT MIX 01-4280-2340 1/16/Oi 1/16/01 2,039.00 JRNL-CD 1010 30B wINKLER VENDOR TOTAL 2571.98 C0820 20721127 976.59 BULK ICE 01-4280-2340 1/16/01 1/16/01 976.59 JRNL-CD 1010 20728359 912.96 BULK ICE 01-4280-2340 1/i6/01 1/16/01 912.96 JRNL-CD 1010 ILL SALT DIVISION VENDOR TOTAL 1889.55 25 2002243 &3.67 HANDLE ASSEMBLY 01-4280-2300 1/16/01 1/16/01 43.67 JRNL-CD 1010 CARLSON TRACTOR'5, E~UIP.* VENDOR TOTAL 43.67 C0855 R045001-01 118.15 POCKET MASK AND VALVE 01-4140-2270 i/1~/01 1/16/01 118.15 JRNL-CD 1010 CHAHPION AHERICA, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 118.15 C0859 D73158 63.83 BLADES 01-4280-2250 63.83 BLADES 73-7300-2250 63.83 BLADES 78-7800-2250 1/16/01 1/16/01 191.49 JRNL-CD 1010 ~P-ION AUTO VEN~O~TAL 191.49 £0960 001231 225.44 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 81-4350-2300 304.00 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 22-~170-2200 26.24 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 01-4280-2250 26.24 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 73-7300-2250 2~.25 MISCELLANEOUS SUPOLIES 78-7800-2250 158.61 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 01-4140-2300 31.?~ MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 01-4320-2300 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES HISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES HISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 47.09 73-7300-2300 43.24 01-4320-2300 7.87 01-2300-0500 28.09 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 01-4340-2~00 8.08 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 01-4340-2330 1/16/01 1/16/01 932.89 JRNL-CD 1010 ST TO COAST VENDOR TOTAL 932.89 PAGE 3 AP-C02-O1 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF HOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE MOLD NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT C0970 61316154 131.i2 1/16/01 1/16/01 131.12 64812076 135.60 1/16/01 1/16/01 135.60 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST VENDOR TOTAL ~ 266.72 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER MIX 71-7!00-9540 JRNL-CD 1010 MIX 71-7100-9540 JRNL-CD 1010 . C0980 001229 1/16/01 1/16/01 40.30 2000 REIMBURSE MILEAGE 01-4090-3340 15.00 REIMBURSE EYE EXAM 01-4090-3140 55.30 JRNL-CD 1010 : COLLETTE ROBERTS VENDOR TOTAL 55.30 Cl104 010105 5,006.40 12-00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01-4110-3120 1/1~/01 1/1~/01 5,006.40 JRNL-CD 1010 CHADaICK AND MERTZ, P.A VENDOR TOTAL 5006.40 Dl180 001231 75.00 REIMBURSE BOOT ALLOWANCE 01-4280-2240 1/16/01 1/16/01 75.00 JRNL-CD 1010 ' DANIEL GRADY VENDOR TOTAL 75.00 D1200 119998 1,326.50 BEER 71-7100-9530 1/16/01 1/14/01 1,326.50 JRNL-CD 1010 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 1326.50 D1300 0333~9 66.23 ~ARNING SIGNS 01-4280-2330 66.22 WARNING SIGNS 73-7300-2330 60.22 WARNING SIGNS 78-7800-2330 1/16/01 1/16/01 I98.67 JRNL-CD 1010 DIXCO ENGRAVING VENDOR TOTAL 198.67 E1420 726564 3,586.35 BEER 71-7100-9530 1/16/01 i/!6/01 3,5E6.35 JRNL-CD 10!0 727455 302.00 BEER KEGS 71-7100-9530 1/16/01 1/16/01 $02.00 JRNL-CD 1010 72822i 2,555.00 BEER 71-7100-9530 1/1~/01 1/16/01 2,555.00 JRNL-CD 1010 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE VENDOR TOTAL 6443.35 El4?? 5655 3,688.64 REPAIR LEAKING SEAL 22-4170-3~20 1/16/01 1/16/01 3,688.64 JRNL-CD 1010 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT. VENDOR TOTAL 3688.64 E1502 00-1751 300.00 LONGPRE BUILDING SURVEY 55-5883-3100 1/16/01 1/16/01 300.00 JRaL-CD 1010 EVERGPEEN LAND SERVICES CO VENDOR TOTAL 300.00 PAGE 4 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C§2-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD PR NO. INVOICE NHBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NdMBER ~I515 1~02 6,779.35 12-00 CURBSIDE RECYCLING ?0-4270-4200 1/16/01 1/16/0i 6,779.35 JRNL-CD 1010 E-Z RECYCLING INC VENDOR IOTAL 6779.35 F1641 14882 I15.20 MIX 71-7100-9540 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME VENDOR TOTAL 115.20 F1720 001231 502.50 12-00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01-4399-3100 1/16/01 1/16/01 502.50 JRNL-CD 1010 FRANK MADDEN & ASSOC VENDOR TOTAL 502.50 F1732 14945 343.75 DEHOLITION COAST TO COAST 55-5881-3100 1/16/01 1/16/01 343.75 JRNL-CD 1010 FUTRELL FIRE CONSULT & DE~ VENDOR TOTAL 343.75 ~0 502970 24.77 12-26-00 UNIFORMS 01-4280-2240 24.77 12-26-00 UNIFORMS 73-7300-2240 24.77 12-26-00 UNIFORMS 78-7800-2240 20.03 12-26-00 MATS 01-4280-2250 20.63 12-26-00 NATS 73-7300-2250 20.62 12-26-00 MATS 78-7B00-2250 512971 39.95 12-26-00 WATS 01-4340-2330 1/16/01 1/16/01 39.95 JRNL-CD 1010 512972 31.36 12-2~-00 MATS 22-4170-2330 512973 27.04 12-26-O0.MATS 71-7100-4210 1/!6/01 1/16/01 27.04 JRNL-CD 1010 G & K SERVICES VENDOR TOTAL 234.54 01800 50005 464.18 TREDDLE VALVE, ETC 78-7800-3810 1/16/01 1/16/01 464.18 JRNL-CD 1010 50065 109.25 HOODLATCH 73-7300-3910 1/16/01 1/16/01 109.25 JRNL-CD 1010 50130 35.99 CABLE 01-4280-3810 1/16/01 1/16/01 33.99 JRNL-CD 1010 50142 40.29 MISCELLANEOUS E~UIPMENT 01-4280-3810 1/16/01 1/16/01 40.29 JRNL-CD 1010 50151 52.79 S~ITCH, TERMINAL, ETC 01-4280-3810 1/16/01 1/i6/01 52.79 JRNL-CD 1010 Y'$ DIESEL SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 700.50 PAGE 5 P U R C H A S E J O U R N A L AP-C02-01 CITY OF HOUND VENDUR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NHBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER G1587 75~1 125.00 REPAIRED WINDOW 01-4280-4200 1/16/01 1/16/01 125.00 JRNL-CD 1010 GLASS PLUS VENDOR TOTAL 125.00 G1890 001231-A 21.30 12-00 WATER #5158500 01-4020-2200 21.35 12-00 WATER #5158500 01-4140-4100 1/16/01 1/16/01 42.60 JRNL-CD ' 1010 001231-B 20.15 12-00 WATER ~5158501 01-4320-2200 1/16/01 1/16/01 20.15 JRNL-CD 1010 001231-C 1.95 12-00 WATER #5158502 01-4280-2200 1.95 12-00 WATER #5158502 73-7300-2200 1.95 12-00 WATER #5158502' ?8-?800-2200 1/16/01 1/16/01 5.85 JRNL-ED 1010 001231-D 13.92 12-00 WATER #32345800 22-4170-3750 1/16/01 1/16/01 13.92 JRNL-CD 1010 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD VENDOR TOTAL 82.52 .21972 315417 338.94 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/16/01 1/16/01 338.94 J~I;L-CD 1010 314567 29.50 MISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE 71-7100-9550 1/16/01 1/16/01 29.50 JRNL-CD 1010 784.64 WINE 71-7100-952~ 318664 1/16/01 i/le/01 784.64 JRNL-CD 1010 604.80 WINE ?1-7100-9520 319614 1/16/01 1/16/01 604.80 JRNL-CD 1010 71.75 WINE 71-7100-9520 319615 1/16/01 1/16/01 71.75 JRNL-CD 1010 1,309.45 WINE 71-7100-9520 1,309.45 JRNL-CD 1010 1/16/~1 1/16/01 ~$ CbOPER g COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 3139.08 G1977 OOI2Ig-A 122.04 THRU 12-19-00 PHONE SERVICE 0i-4320-3220 8.26 THRU 12-19-00 LONG DISTRANCE 01-4090-3220 7.94 THRU 12-19-00 LONG DISTRANCE 01-4040-3220 3.40 THRU 12-19-00 LONG DISTRANCE 81-4350-3220 1/16/01 1/16/01 141.64 JRNL-CD 1010 001219-B 48.34 THRU 12-14-00 PHONE SERVICE 01-4280-3220 48.33 THRU 12-14-00 PHONE SERVICE 73-7300-3220 48.53 THRU 12-14-00 PHONE SERVICE 78-7800-3220 1/16/01 1/16/01 145.00 JRNL-CD 1010 001219-C 121.74 THRU 12-14-00 PHONE 472-3711 0!-4140-3220 121.74 JRNL-CD lC 1/16/01 1/1~/01 PAGE 6 AP-C02-O1 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE . DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE N~R DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER G T E MINNESOTA VENDOR TOTAL 408.38 H1998 047200 559.30 PLOW BLADE AND BOLTS 01-4280-2310 1/16/01 1/16/01 559.30 JRNL-CD 1010 H & L MESABI, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 559.30' M2010 001215 6.18 REIMBURSE MILEAGE 01-4040-3340 HANSON, KANDIS VENDOR TOTAL 6.18 H2080 2~598 15.9B SNIVEL ADOPTER 01-4280-2310 1/16/01 1/i6/01 15.98 JRNL-CD 2~695 219.82 HOSE 01-4280-2310 1/16/01 1/16/01 219.82 JRNL-CD 1010 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP VENDOR TOTAL 235.80 139 51980 16.00 REPAIR RADIO 22-4170-3820 1/16/01 1/16/01 16.00 JRNL-CD 1010 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF VENDOR TOTAL lo.00 H2140 001227-A 331.15 10-00 SERVICE BOOKING FEE 01-4110-4250 001227-B 413.55 11-00 SERVICE 300KING FEE 01-4110-4250 1/i6/01 1/16/01 413.55 JRNL-CD 1010 HENN CO SHERIFFS DEPT VENDOR TOTAL 744.70 tt215i 001228 86.25 LABELS 350' LIST AROUND 01-4340-2140 1/16/01 1/16/01 85.25 JRNL-CD 1010 dENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER VENDOk TOTAL 86.25 H2160 002989 1,535.50 11-00 ROOM AND BOARD 01-4140-4250 1/16/01 1/16/01 1,535.50 JRNL-CD 1010 HENN CO TREASURER VENDOR TOTAL 1535.50 H2230 001231 68.01 PAYROLL FORMS 01-4095-2200 1/16/01 1/16/01 68.01 JRNL-CD 1010 ~ICKOPY TECH VENDOR TOTAL 68.01 h2241 OOi09-G 130.00 10-00 SENIOR C~NTER PLAT 01-2300-1088 1/16/01 1/16/01 130.00 JRNL-CD 1010 O01109-H 130.00 10-00 5212 LYNWOOD SUBDIVISION 01-2300-10o7 1/16/01 1/16/01 130.00 JRNL-CD lOlO 32.50 10-00 5456 BARTLETT VARIANCE 01-4190-3100 001109-I PAGE 7 AP-C02-O1 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMGR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER 1/16/01 1/16/01 32.50 JRNL-CD 1010 O01109-J 1/16/01 1/16/01 48.75 10-00 4600 CUMBERLAND VARIANCE 48.75 JRNL-CD 01-4190-3100 1010 O01109-K 1/16/01 1/16/01 130.00 10-00 6349 WALNUT SUBDIVISION 130.00 JRNL-CD 01-2300-1111 1010 O01109-L 1/16/01 1/16/01 97.50 10-00 2857 HIGHLAND SUBDIVISIO 97.50 JRNL-CD 01-2300-1112 1010 O01109-M 1/16/01 1/16/01 195.00 10-00 CHESTNUT PRELIMINARY PLA 195.00 JRNL-CD 01-2300-1109 1010 O01109-N 1/16/01 1/16/01 48.75 10-00 METRO PLAINS PRELIM PLAT 48.75 JRNL-CD 01-2300-1097 1010 001109-0 1/16/01 1/16/01 48.75 10-00 METRO PLAINS CUP 48.75 JRNL-CD 01-2300-1097 1010 001206 1/16/01 1/16/01 103.04 10-00 TIF RELATED WORK 103.04 JRNL-CD 55-5880-3100 1010 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP,* VENDOR TOTAL I2384 359849 964.29 127.69 BATTERIES (2) 78-7800-2310 1/16/01 1/16/01 INTERSTATE BATTERIES VENDOR TOTAL 127.69 JRNL-CD 127.69 1010 12400 6804 1/16/01 1/16/01 155.05 REPAIR STARTER, ETC. 155.05 JPNL-CD 01-4280-3510 1010 6870 1/16/01 1/16/01 59.00 R&R FUEL PUMP 59.00 JRNL-CD 01-4280-3810 !010 6631 1/16/01 1/16/01 29.00 12-01-00 AUTO REPAIR 29.00 JRNL-CD 01-4140-3810 1010 6568 1/16/01 1/16/01 43.86 12-06-00 AUTO REPAIR 43.86 JRNL-CD 01-4140-3810 1010 6674 1/16/01 1/16/01 25.86 12-11-00 AUTO REPAIR 25.66 JRNL-CD 01-4140-3810 1010 6740 1/16/01 1/16/01 675.91 12-19-00 AUTO REPAIR 675.91 JRNL-CD 01-4140-3810 1010 6763 1/16/01 1/16/01 25.86 12-22-00 AUTD REPAIR 25.86 JRNL-CD 01-4140-3810 1010 6851 1/16/01 1/16/01 702.76 01-03-01 AUTO REPAIR 702.76 JRNL-CD 01-4140-3810 1010 ISLAND PARK SKELLY VENDOR TOTAL 1717.30 PAGE 8 P U R £ d A S ~ J O U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CIIY OF HOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD PR! NO. INVOICE NHSR DATE DATE STATUS AKOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER J2579 1199721 163.50 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/16/01 1/16/01 163.60 JRNL-CD 1010 1199722 531.70 WINE 71-7100-9520 1/16/01 1/16/01 531.70 JRNL-CD 1010 1199723 .; 265.00 LIJ@UOR 71-7100-9510 1/16/01 I/1~/01 265.00 JRNL-CD 1010 1199725 694.80 WINE 71-7100-9520 1/16/01 1/16/01 694.80 JRNL-CD 1010 1199726 368.55 WINE 71-7100-9520 1/i6/01 1/16/01 368.55 JRNL-CD lOlO 1203166 2,464.70 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/i6/O1 1/16/01 2,464.70 JRNL-CD 1010 1203167 1,970.64 WINE 71-7100-9520 1/16/01 1/16/01 1,970.64 JRNL-CD 1010 1203168 1,555.36 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/16/01 1/16/01 1,555.36 JRNL-CD 1010 1203814 812.90 LI@UOR 71-7100-o510 1/16/01 !/!6/01 812.90 JRNL-CD 1010 JOHNSON 5ROTHERS LIQUOR VENDOR TOTAL 8527.45 J2600 001231 i17.32 NEIMBUkSE ZILEAGE 01-4090-3340 1/16/01 !/16/01 117.32 JRNL-CD 1010 JOYCE NELSON VENDgR TOTAL 117.32 J2610 001221 28.35 COUNCIL C90KIES 01-4020-4120 1/16/0i 1/16/01 26.35 JRNL-CD 1010 001223 35.13 MEETING SNACKS 71-7100-4120 i/16/01 1/16/0i 35.i3 JRNL-CD 1010 JUBILEE FOODS VENDOR TOTAL 63.48 J6579 001231 29.99 REIMBURSE FITNESS PROGRAM 01-4140-2240 1/16/01 1/16/01 29.99 JRNL-CD !010 JAMI BURKE VENDOR TOTAL 29.99 ~2773 001231 11,602.84 07-0i-o0 THRU 09-30-00 AGREEME 01-4030-3100 1/16/01 1/16/01 11,602.64 JPNL-CD 1010 -CAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA* VENDOR TOIAL 11602.84 L2811 11598 71.35 ENVELOPES 01-4040-2100 71.35 ENVELOPES 01-4090-2100 71.35 ENVELOPES 01-~190-2i00 71.~5 E~4VELOPE$ 01-4340-2100 PAGE 9 P U R C H A S E J O U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF HOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NM~R DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER 20.99 ENVELOPES 01-4280-2100 20.99 ENVELOPES 71-7100-2J00 46.14 ENVELOPES 73-7300-2100 46.14 ENVELOPES 78-7800-2100 419.66 JRNL-CD 1010 i/16/01 1/16/01 11o13 137.03 NCR 2-PART 71-7100-2100 1/16/01 1/10/01 137.03 JRNL-CD 1010 11014 235;35 LEDGER SHEETS 71-7100-2100 1/16/01 1/16/01 235.35 JRNL-CD 1010 LARSON PEINTING & GPAPHICS VENDOR TOTAL M3016 8616 792.04 16.80 12-18-00 DELIVERY CHARGE 71-7100-9600 1/16/01 1/16/01 16.80 JRNL-CD 1010 8537 112.70 12-21-00 DELIVERY CHARGE 71-7100-9600 2/16/01 1/16/01 112.70 JRNL-CD 1010 8651 40.00 12-26-00 DELIVERY CHARGE 71-7100-9600 1/16/01 1/16/01 40.60 JRNL-CD 101A ~672 121.80 12-29-00 DELIVERY CHARGE 71-7100-9600 1/16/01 1/16/01 121.80 JRNL-CD 1010 MARLIN'S TRUCKING VENDOR TOTAL 291.90 M3030 233292 27.60 BEER 71-7100-9530 i/16/0% 1/16/01 27.00 JRNL-CD 1010 220946 1,123.13 LIOUOR 71-7100-95!0 1/16FO1 1/16701 1,i23.13 JRNL-CD 1010 229405 2,974.70 BEER 71-7100-9530 1/16/01 1/10/01 2,974.70 JRNL-CD 1010 231715 1,498.90 BEER 71-7100-9530 1/i6/01 1/16/01 1,49B.90 JRNL-CD 1010 23i716 78.80 BEER 7i-7100-9530 1/16/01 1/16/01 70.80 JRNL-CD 1010 'lARK VII DISTRIBUTOR VENDOR TOTAL 5703.13 H3077 001231 244.42 THRU 12-31-00 MILEAGE REIHBURS 81-4350-3340 1/16/0i 1/16/01 244.42 JRNL-CD I010 ~ICCAFFREY, THOHAS VENDOR TOTAL 244.42 ~A~-8-0--3~012 8,713.60 11-00 ~EST EDGE MISC ENGINEERI 01-2300-1095 1/10/01 1/16/01 8,713.60 JRNL-CD 1010 35013 2,695.70 11-00 WESTEDGE HISC ENGINEERIN 01-2300-1095 1/16/01 1/i6/O1 2,695.70 JPNL-CD 1010 PAGE iO P U R C H A S E J O U R N A L AP-C02-01 CITY OF VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. I~vOICE N~BR D^TE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NdMBER 35014 765.00 I1-00 P/I MISC ENGINEERING 01-4190-3100 1/16/01 1/16/01 765.00 JRNL-CD 1010 35015 135.00 11-00 P/Z ~ISC ENGINEERING 01-4190-3100 1/16/01 1/16/01 135.00 JRNL-CD 1010 35016 135.00 11-00 STREETS MISC ENCINEERING 01-4280-3100 1/16/01 1/16/01 135.00 JRNL-CD 1010 35017-A 62.50 11-00 WATER MISC ENGINEERING 73-7300-3100 1/16/01 1/16/01 62.50 JRNL-CD 1010 35017-B 62.50 11-00 SEWER MI3C ENGINEERING 78-7800-3100 i/16/01 1/16/01 62.50 JRNL-CD 1010 35018 90.00 11-00 PARKS MISC ENGINEERING 01-4340-3i00 1/16/01 1/16/01 90.00 JRNL-CD 1010 35019 229.00 11-00 AUDITORS ROAD MSAP 55-5883-3100 i/16/01 1/16/01 22~.00 JRNL-CD 1010 35020 973.60 11-00 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 01-4190-3100 1/16/01 1/16/01 973.00 JRNL-CD 1010 35321 269.70 iI-O0 SET~q ~LUFF PLAT REVIEW 01-2300-1043 i/16/01 1/16/01 269.70 JRNL-C~ 1010 35022 415.20 11-00 STORM WATER UTILITY 01-4280-3100 1/16/01 1/16/01 415.20 JRNL-CD 1010 35023 272.Q0 1!-00 ~ECKER 3 POINTS GRADING 01-2300-1098 1/16/0i 1/16/01 272.00 JRNL-CD 1010 35024 3,420.90 11-00 METRO PLAINS 5600 LYNWO0 0i-2300-1096 1/i6/Oi 1/16/01 3,420.90 JRNL-CD 1010 35625 90.00 i1-00 DOWD~T~ TIF ~ISTRICT 55-5880-3100 I/l~/Ol 1/16/01 90.00 JRNL-CD 10~0 35026 5,077.40 11-00 TRUE VALUE MISC ENGINEER 01-2300-1096 1/16/01 1/1~/01 5,077.40 JRNL-CC 1010 35027 135.00 11-00 HASSOR CONTAMINATION 01-2300-1089 1/16/01 1/lO/O1 135.00 JRNL-CD 1010 35028 45.00 i1-00 MUONIO SUBDIVISION 01-2300-1083 1/16/01 1/1~/01 45.00 JPNL-CD lOlO 3502~ 1,65v.80 i!-OO REX ALwlN P~OPE~TY 01-2300-10o5 1/16/Oi 1/16/01 1,650.80 JPNL-CD 1010 35030 535.00 11-00 CHESTNUT ROAD 01-2300-1113 1/16/01 1/16/01 535.00 JRNL-CD 1010 35031 280.20 11-00 lgO0 Co-MERCE CUP 280.20 JRNL-(D 01-2300-1115 XoXO PAGE ii P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCI* VENDOR TOTAL 26053.10 M3290 6346 34.70 DUI FORFEITURE FORMS 01-4140-2120 1/16/01 1/16/01 34.70 JRNL-CD 10~0 MN COUNTY ATTDRNEY ASSN VENDOR TOTAL . 34.70 M3328 001221 105.00 CERTIF'IC HOROSHAK,STEVENS, TODD 22-4170-4110 1/16/01 1/16/01 105.00 JRNL-CD 1010 ~4N FIRE SERV CERTIFICATN * VE~{DOR TOTAL 105.00 ~370 00i222 i,s30.00 09-13-00 THRU 12-19-00 LOST LA 55-5878-3100 1/16/01 1/16/0! 1,530.00 JRNL-CD lOlO MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENC VENDOR TOTAL 1530.00 N3740 TI-0059798 469.14 SIGNS MISCELLANEOUS 0i-4280-2360 1/16/01 1/16/01 469.14 JRNL-CD 1010 TI-0060380 37.07 SIGNS, PADDLE 73-7300-231( 37.06 SIGNS, PADDLE 78-7800-2310 1/16/01 1/16/01 74.13 JRNL-CD 10~0 NE~HAN SIGNS VENDOR TOTAL 543.27 N3800 00123i 4,714.81 THRU 12-00 #0542-505-000-001 01-4280-37~0 1/16/01 1/16/01 4,714.81 JRNL-CD 1010 001231-B 737.81 12-00 #2245-301-939 01-4320-3710 21.99 12-00 #0466-607-223 01-4150-3710 260.79 12-00 #1914-601-425 71-7100-3710 2,858.38 12-00 #0217-606-329 73-7300-3710 388.84 12-00 #2184-407-147 22-4170-3710 83.57 12-00 ~0047-005-229 01-4340-3710 17.57 12-00 #0864-508-832 02-4180-3710 17.57 12-00 #0864-508-~32 73-7300-3710 i7.57 12-00 #0864-508-832 78-7800-3710 1,192.30 12-00 #0009-604-835 78-7800-3710 225.91 12-00 #0009-604-835 01-4280-3710 1/16/01 1/16/01 5,622.~0 JRNL-CD lOlO NORTHERN STATES POWER CO VENDOR TOTAL 10537.11 03895 3938-55438 1,150.00 2000 SERVICE AGREEHENT 22-4170-3830 1/16/01 1/16/01 1,150.00 JRNL-CD 1010 OWENS SERVICE ONE ~ENDOR TOTAL 1150.00 P3948 000053 415.00 12-00 CONFERENCE, CHRISTENSON 01-4140-4110 1/16/01 1/10/01 415.00 JRNL-CD 1010 PERF VENDOR TOTAL 415.00 P4000 54495306 84.12 ~;IX 71-7100-954t PAGE 12 PURCHASE JOURNAL AP-C02-01 CITY OF MOUND ~ENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE N~BR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTIOt; ACCOUNT NUMBER 1/16/01 1/16/01 8&.12 JRNL-CD 1010 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 84.12 P4021 675458 150.70 WINE 71-7100-9520 i/16/01 1/16/01 150.70 JRNL-CD i010 676578 340.48' LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/16/01 1/16/01 340.48 JRNL-CD 1010 676879 309.55 WINE 71-7100-9520 1/16/01 1/16/01 309.55 JRNL-CD 1010 679721 110.50 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/16/01 1/16/01 110.50 JRNL-CD 1010 679722 510.00 WINE 71-7100-9520 1/16/01 1/16/01 510.00 JRNL-CD 1010 679723 49.50 WINE 71-7100-9520 1/16/01 1/16/01 49.50 JRNL-CD 1010 681593 336.75 WINE 71-7100-9520' -- i/16/01 1/16/01 336.75 JRNL-CD 1010 079435 1,955.90 WINE 71-7100-9520 1/16/01 1/16/01 1,955.90 JRNL-CD 1010 ~HILLIPS ~INE & SPIRITS, ~ VENDOR TOTAL 3763.38 P~038 35206 1,187.28 CIGARETTES 71-7100-9550 1/16/0I 1/16/01 1,187.28 JRNL-CD lOlO 38388 799.55 CIGARETTES 71-7100-9550 1/i6/O1 1/16/01 799.55 JRNL-CD 1010 PIHqACLE DISTRIBUTING VENDOR TOIAL 1986.83 P4105 02517648 54.51 11-27-00 CLASSIFIED 01-4140-3510 1/16/01 1/16/01 54.51 JRNL-CD 1010 ~RES$ AND NEWS PUBLICATION VENDOR TOTAL 54.5i @417i 913091-00 2,787.94 LIQUOR 7i-7100-9510 1/i6/O1 1/16/01 2,787.94 JRNL-CD 1010 913087-00 105.60 MISCELLANEOUS NON-TAXABLE 71-7100-9550 1/i6/0i 1/lO/O1 105.60 JRNL-CD 1010 913593-00 1,733.84 WINE 71-7100-9520 i/1~01 I/i6/O1 1,733.84 JRNL-CD 1010 152.35 ~INE 71-7100-9542 915608-00 915759-00 1/16/01 1/16/01 152.36 JRNL-CD 1010 1,172.7& LIaUOR 71-7~00--9~10 PAGE 13 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF HOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE N~BR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER 1/16/01 1/16/01 1,172.74 JRNL-CD 1010 915760-00 23.90 NIX 71-7100-9540 1/16/01 1/16/01 23.90 JRNL-CD 1010 916231-00 173.00 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/16/01 1/16/01 173.00 JRNL-CD 1010 'QUALITY wINE & 5PIkITS VENDOR TOTAL ': 6149.38 R4210 001228 10.47 THRU 12-31-00 MILEAGE REIMBURS 01-4040-3340 RAHN, JODI L. 1/16/01 1/16/01 10.47 JRNL-CD VENDOR TOTAL 10.47 1010 R&250 554497 51.25 12-11-00 DELIVERY CHARGE 01-4190-4100 1/16/01 1/16/01 51.25 JRNL-CD 1010 ROADRUNNER TRANSPROTATION~ VENDOR TOTAL 51.25 R4290 81185 40.32 ICE 71-7100-9550 1/16/01 1/16/01 40.32 JRNL-CD 103 81493 108.24 ICE 71-7100-9550 1/16/01 1/10/01 106.24 JRNL-CD 1010 RON'S ICi COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 14~.56 S4430 62360 442.77 ~ARNIN~ SIGNS 78-7800-2300 1/16/01 1/16/01 442.77 JRNL-CD 1010 62464 132.27 BUSINESS CARDS TRAUX,BdETOW 01-4110-3500 1/16/01 1/16/01 132.27 JRNL-CD lOlO SOS PRINTING VENDOR TOTAL 575.04 54605 212771 10,776.42 THRU 12-09-00 PRO SERVICES 55-5878-3100 1/16/O1 1/16/01 10,776.42 JqNL-CD iOlO STS CONSULTANTS LTD VENDOR TOTAL 10776.42 54630 001226 437.56 THRU 12-26-00 GAS CHARGES 73-7300-2210 284.63 THRU 12-26-00 GAS CHARGES 01-4340-2210 2,023.51 THRU 12-26-00 GAS CHARGES 01-4280-2210 19.10 THRU 12-26-00 GAS CHARGES 01-4190-2210 280.03 THRU 12-26-00 GAS CHARGES 78-7800-2210 1116/01 1/16/01 3,04~.~3 JRNL-CD 1010 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC VENDOR TOTAL 3044.83 $4631 002226 1,260.11 THRU 12-26-00 GAS CHARGES 01-4140-2210 1/16/O1 1/16/01 1,260.11 J~NL-CD lOlO SPEED~AY SUPERAMERICA LLC VENDOR TOTAL 1260.11 S4632 00%226 523.30 THRU 12-26-00 SAS CHAmGES 22-4170-2210 PAGE I4 ~P-C02-O1 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AwOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER PR 1/16/01 1/16/01 523.30 JRNL-CD 1010 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC VENDOR TOTAL T4730 305 523.30 58.05 i1-11-00 AD FOR BIDS 318 1/16/01 1/16/01 58.05 JRNL-CD 18.72 11-25-00 AGREEMENT 55-5881-3100 1010 01-2300-1096 320 1/16/01 1/16/01 18.72 JRNL-CD 37.45 11-25-00 VACATION/EASEMENT 1010 01-2300-1096 321 1116/01 1116/01 37.45 JRNL-CD 28.08 11-25-00 ZONING AMENDMENT lOlO 01-2300-1096 315 1/16/01 1/16/01 28.08 JRNL-CD 18.72 11-25-00 PRELIMINARY PLAT 1010 01-2300-1096 35O 1/16/01 1/16/01 18.72 JRNL-CD 89.88 12-23-00 SUB DIVISION 1010 01-2300-1097 LAKER 1/16/01 1/16/01 VENDOR TOTAL 89.68 JRNL-CD 250.90 1010 T4731 341 1/16/01 1/16/01 693.00 12-16-00 ~ 12-23-00 DISPLAY 693.00 JRNL-CD 71-7100-3510 1010 THE LAKER/PIONEER VENDOR TOTAL 693.00 T4770 182776 1/16/01 1/16/01 12o.00 BEER KEGS 12o.00 JPNL-CD 71-7100-9530 1010 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN VENDOR TOTAL T4790 41962 126.00 12.41 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 73-7300-2310 41~56 1/16/01 1/16/01 12.41 JRNL-CD 2.77 BOLT lOlO 73-7300-2310 1/16/01 1/16/01 THURK BROS CHEVROLET VENDOR TOTAL 2.77 JRNL-CD 15.18 1010 T480~ 13237-A 1/16/01 1/16/01 70.25 12-14-00 POSC HEETING 70.25 JRNL-CD 01-4340-4200 1010 1/16/01 1/16/01 106.63 12-21-00 DOCK MEETING 106.63 JRNL-CD 81-4350-4200 1010 TIME SAVER OFF SITE SECRE~ VENDOR TOTAL 176.85 T4825 1053 1/16/01 1/16/01 75.00 CLEANED PRINTER P/I 75.00 JRNL-CD 01-4095-3800 1010 TMB CONSdLTING, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 75.00 153.~& 12--00 ELEVATO~ SERVICE Ol-&320-a200 PAGE 15 AP-C02-OI PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE N~BR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER 1/16/01 1/1§/01 153.84 JRNL-CD 1010 THYSSEN LAGER~UIST ELEVATO VENDOR TOTAL T4985 284809-00 153.84 79.78 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4040-2100 79.7B MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4090-2100 79.78 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4140-2100 79.78 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SdPPLIES 01-4190-2100 79.78 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4340-2100 26.10 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4280-2100 26.10 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 71-7100-2100 1/16/01 1/16/01 35.37 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 73-7300-2100 35.38 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 78-7800-2100 521.B5 JRNL-CD lOlO 282781-0 1/16/01 1/16/01 84.81 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 22-4170-2100 84.81 JRNL-CD 1010 283968-0 170.93 FILE CABINET, STAPLER 01-4040-2100 229.97 TONER, BINDERS, ETC. 01-4090-2100 284352-0 1/16/01 1/16/01 400.90 JRNL-CD 1010 329.52 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4140-2100 285103-0 1/16/01 1/16/01 329.52 JRNL-CD 101. 38.71 FILES, STORAGE, ETC. 22-4170-2100 1/16/01 1/16/01 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY CO VENDOR TOTAL 38.71 JRNL-CD 1375.79 1010 ~5510 001220 1/16/00 1/16/00 500.00 THRU 09-25-00 MEDIATION SERVIC 01-4020-3100 500.00 JRNL-CD lOlO WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION C* VENDOR TOTAL 500.00 W5551 15350 1,163.75 REPAIR COMPUTERS 01-4140-4200 : 1/16/00 1/16/00 1,163.75 JRNL-CD iOlO 15~i 1,093.18 REPAIR COMPUTERS 01-4140-4200 1/16/00 1/16/00 1,093.18 JRNL-CD 1010 15352 30~.75 REPAIR COMPUTERS 01-4140-4200 1/16/00 1/16/00 30B.75 JRNL-CD 1010 ~ESTONKA COMPUTING VENDOR TOTAL 2565.68 Q5571 28015 49.35 BRASS ELBOWS, ETC 73-7300-2300 1/16/00 1/i6/O0 49.35 JRNL-CD lOlO wESTONRA MECHANICAL CONTR* VENDOR TOTAL 49.35 W5690 32183 56.23 12-07-00 CONCRETE 01-42d0-2340 1/16/01 1/16/01 50.23 JRNL-CD 1010 32374 1~8.10 12-04-00 BLACKTOP 73-7300-2340 1/16/01 1/16/01 148.10 JRNL-CD 10' PAGE 16 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NdMBER 32375 1,047.53 12-14-00 CONC°ETE 01-4280-2340 1/16/01 1/16/01 1,047.53 JRNL-CD 1010 32521 1,661.32 12-20-00 {ONCRETE 01-4280-2340 II16/01 1/!6/01 1,661.32 JRNL-CD 1010 32680 127.02 12-27-00 BANK FILL 73-7300-2340 1/16/01 1/16/01 127.02 JRNL-CD 1010 WM MUELLER & SONS VENDOR TOTAL 3040.20 Z5850 2965 14.20 LIQUID CAR WASH 01-4280-2250 i4.20 LIQUID CAR WASH 73-7300-2250 14.20 LIQUID CAR WASH 78-7800-2250 1/16/00 1/16/00 42.60 JRNL-CD 1010 2966 157.09 CAR WASH, 5~UEE6E, ETC. 22-4170-2200 1/16/00 1/16/GO 157.09 JRNL-CD 1010 S INC VENDOR TOTAL 199.69 14965 1,966.05 REPAIRS ON LADDER TRUCK 22-4170-3880 !/I6/00 1/16/00 i,966.05 JRNL-CD 1010 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVI VENDOR TOTAL 1966.05 Z6805 SI054819 930.00 TANK TESTS 73-7300-4200 1/16/01 1/16/01 930.00 JRNL-CD 1010 SORRPOR COHPANIES, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 930.00 TOTAL ALL VENDORS 157,366.33 PAGE i P U R C H A S E J O U R N A L AP-CO2-O1 CITY Of MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE N"BR DATE DATE STATUS AMUUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUHBER AO050 001222 1,500.00 AUDIT THROUGH 12-22-00 01-4090-3130 i/23/01 1/23/01 1,500.00 JRNL-CD 1010 ABDO ABDO LICK g MEYER5 LL VENDOR TOTAL 1/23/01 1/23/0! ALL SEASONS LANDSCAPE DESi VE~DO~ TOTAL A0338 927.8 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 1500.00 4,801.00 STAiAw^Y BLUEBIRD LANE JRNL-CD 119.08 PAGER REPAIR 119.08. 1010 22-4170-3200 i0i0 A0397 623109 23.28 01-01-01 THRU 03-31-01 METER 23.28 01-01-01 THRU 03-31-01 METER 23.28 Oi-Ol-Oi THRU 63-31-01 HETER 23.28 01-01-01 THRU 03-31-01 METER 23.28 01-01-01 THRU 03-31-01 METER 23.28 Oi-Ol-Oi THRU 03-31-01 METER 7.76 01-01-01 THRU 03-31-01 METER 7.76 0!-0i-01 THRU 03-31-01 METER 7.75 01-01-01 THRU 03-31-01 HETER 162.95 JRNL-CD 01-4040-3210 01-4090-3210 01-4140-3210 01-4190-3210 22-4170-3210 01-4340-3210 01-4280-3210 73-7300-3210 7G-?G00-3210 1010 162.95 150.00 SHIRTS WITH CITY LOGO 150.00 JRNL-CD 1/23/01 1/23/01 ASCOi-~ HASLER ~AiLiNG SYSTE VE~<DDR TOTAL A0403 010110 1/23/01 1/23/01 ASPEN EMBROIDERY & DESIGN VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 01-4140-2240 I010 A0410 823 3,048.00 2001 MEMBERSHIP DUES 01-4020-4130 1/23/01 1/23/01 3,048.00 JRNL-CD 1010 3048.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 2001 DUES, HARRELL,TRAUX,HCKi;~ JRNL-CO 01-4140-4130 1010 770.~6 REPAIR LOCK 770.~6 JRNL-CD ASSOC OF METRO MUNICIPALI~ VENDOR TOTAL A0413 001226 1/23/01 1123/01 ASSOC OF TRAiNiNG OF OFFi~ VENDOR TOTAL A0414 25685 1/23/81 1/23701 01-4320-3830 1010 ASSURED SECURITY VENDOR TOTAL 770.96 B0549 20~79B00 1,571.55 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/23/01 1/23/01 1,571.55 JRNL-CD 1010 20507600 2,507.05 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/23/01 1/23/01 2,507.05 URNL-CD 10!0 BELLBOY CORPORATION VENDOR TOTAL 4078.b0 ,E 2 ~ENDOR ND. INVOICE P u R C H A $ E J 0 U R N AL CITY OF MOUND INVOICE DUE HOLD P: DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTIgN ACCOUNT NUMBER 507o5 001215 99.00 2~01 TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE 01-4040-3800 1/23/01 1/23/01 99.00 JRNL-CD 1010 BUSINESS MACHINES SALES &= VS~DOR TOTAL 99.00 CO820 2175325 2,667.20 6UL~ iCE 01-4280-2346 1/23/01 1/23/01 2,667.28 JRNL-CD 1010 21752246 90~.25 ~UL~ iCE 01-4280-2340 1/23/01 1/23/01 908.25 JRI~L-CD 1010 CARGILL SALT DiViSiON VEi~DOR TOTAL 3575.53 ' C0859 D74618 '- - - 11.70 BULBS 01-4340-3810 1/23/01 1/23/01 1i.?0 JENL-CD 1010 CHAMPION AUTO VENDOR TOTAL 11.70 ~ C0970 61324109 124.56 MIX - 1/23/01 1/23/0I 124.56 JRNL-CD COCA COLA 50TTLING-MIDWEST VENDOR TOTAL 124.56 ---61020 GrOwl31 443.19 0i-0i RRiNCiRLE TRUE VALUE 55-5881-6100 518.65 01-01 INTEREST TRUE VALUE 55-5881-6110 961.84 JRNL-CD 1010 010228 443.19 02-01 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE 55-5881-6100 518.65' 02-01 INTEREST TRUE VALUE 55-5881-6110 CONCO, INCORPORATED VENDOR TOTAL 1923.68 Cl102 7ii 1,383.00 2001 CO~¢TRACT 0i-4140-4200 1/23/0i 1/23/01 1,303.00 JRNL-CD 1010 CORNERHOUSE VENDOR TOTAL 1383.00 Clll~ Vi~OOS~ 12.4S HEADLAHP ~EL^Y 0i-4280-2310 1/23/01 1/23/01 12.45 JRNL-CD 1010 -' C~YSTEEL DiST iNC. VENDOR TOTAL ~2.45 Dll?2 338806 1,503.95 ASSAULT NOZZLE 22-4170-2200 !/23/0i 112~131 1,50~.;9 J~L-CD iOiG 338821 1,543.43 TANK AND ~UNNER 22-4170-2200 1/23/01 1/23/01 1,54~.4] JR~L-CD i0i0 338835 436.1~ SUCTION HOSE 22-4170-2200 1/23/01-~23/01 436.18 JRi-~L-CD 1010 33~903 194.00 HELMET 22-4170-2200 1/~-3/01 1/25/01 194.00 J~L-CD 1010 DANKO EMERGENCY EGUIPMEKT VENDOR TOTAL 3677.56 PAGE 3 P U R C H A S E J O U R 'N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF HOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. IN¥'OIC~ NMSR DATE DATE STATUS AHOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER 01200 120703 1,047.95 BEER 71-7100-9530 1i23,' OJ. J./23;0i i,u~,2.95 JP. NL-CD 1010 12~704 34.15 MIX 71-7100-9540 z/23;0i i/23/0i 34.£5 JRNL-CD 1010 121207 - DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL BEER 71-7100-9530 JRKL-CD iOiO 01233 495346793 1,116.14 COMPUTER 22-4170-5000 1/23/01 1/23/01 1,116.14 JRNL-CD 1010 DELL ACCOUNT CREDIT VENDOR TOTAL 1116.14 Di258 731021 i,08e.76 AmMdAL REPORT ~ATER USE 73-7300-4220 1/23/01 1/23/01 1,084.76 JRNL-CD 1010 DEPT OF NATURAL RESDdRCES VENDOR TOTAL i0~4.76 D1300 033458 8.52 COUNCIL PLATES (2) 0~-4020-2200 1/23/01 1/23/01 6.52 $RNL-CD 101" 033459 11.~2 COUNCIL PLATES (2) 01-4020-2200 1723/01 1/23/01 11.62 JRNL-CD 1010 033477 8.52 DESK ~LATES (2) 01-4340-2200 t/23/01 1/23/01 8.r~ JRNL-CD 1010 DIXCO ENGRAVING VENDOR TOTAL 28.66 El~20 72V601 5,000.20 BEER 71-7100-9530 1/23/01 1/23/01 5,000.20 JRNL-CD 1010 730894 114.00 BEER KEGS 71-7100-9530 1/23/01 1/23/01 114.00 JRNL-CD 1010 732844 2,138.95 BEER 71-7100-9530 1/23/01 1/23/01 2,13~.95 JRNL-CD 1010 734256 104.00 BEER KEGS 71-7100-9530 1/23/01 1/23/01 104.00 JRNL-CD 1010 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE VENDOR TOTAL 7357.15 [1472 1/23/01 1/23/01 390.00 JRNL-CD 1010 ~,,u~u~u ~,~,[,-,~ i,.~. VENDDR ,u,AL 396.20 G1750 519259 24.77 01-02-01 UNIFORMS 01-4280-2240 24.77 01-02-01 UNiFORHS 73-7300-2240 24.77 01-02-01 UNIFORMS 78-78U0-2240 ~1.44 01-02-01 MATS 01-4280-2250 4 AP-C02-O1 VENDOR N3. INVOICE NMB~ INVOICE DUE HOLD DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT RCHASE JOg CITY OF MOUND RN AL DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER 525629 525628 1/25/0i i/23/0i 531981 ' 525630 525627 /-/23/0i i/23/0i 1/23/01 1/23;01 1123/01 1123101 11.43 01-02-01 MATS 73-7300-2250 11.43 01-02-01 MATS 78-7800-2250 iO6.0i JR~L-CD 1010 31.78 01-09-01 MATS 22-4170-2230 31.78 JRNL-CD i0i0 39.95 01-09-01 HATS 01-4340-2330 39.95 JRNL-CD i0i0 99.78 01-16-01 "ATS 01-4320-4210 99.78 JRNL-CD 27.04 01-09-01 MATS ' 71-7100-4210 27.04 JRNL-CD 1010 24.77 01-09-01 UNIFORMS 01-4280-2240 24.77 01-09-Gi UNiFORH$ 73-7300-224u 24.7? 01-09-01 UNIFORMS 73-7300-2240 20.91 01-09-01 MATS 01-4280-2250 20.90 01-09-01 ~AT5 73-T3~-225~ 20.90 01-09-01 MATS 78-7800-2250 137.02 JRNL-C9 1010 G & I~ SERVICES VENDOR TOTAL 444.18 i/23/01 1/23/01 1010 59.00 JRNL-CD 324171 406.26 WINE 71-71~0-9520 1/23/01 1/23/01 406.26 3RNL-CD 1010 324172 E9.~5 UINE 71-7100-9570 1/23/01 1/23/01 E9.85 JENL-CD 1010 324926 1,907.45 LI%UOR 71-?i00-9510 1/23/01 1/23/01 1,907.45 JRNL-CD 1010 GR]GGS CSOP[R ~ COMPANY VZNDGR TOTAL 2462.56 H2110 001226 40.00 2001 MEMBERSHIP DUES 01-~140-4130 1/23/01 1/23/01 40.00 JRNL-CD 1010 HENNEPI~ COUNTY CHIEFS OF VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 H2230 010109 4,375.00 Ol-Ol-Oi THRU 12-31-01 01-4095-3800 1/23/01 1/23/01 4,575.00 JRNL-CD lOlO HICKORY TECH VENDOR TOTAL 4375.00 ~2309 2~23316 9~.7~ 12-24-00 THRU 01-24-01 CG~iE2 01-4140-2140 1/23/01 1/23/01 99.79 JRNL-CD 1010 237858~4 495.72 12-Ol-GO TH~U 12-01-01 01-4140-3200 i/23/01 1/23/01 495.72 JRNL-ED 1010 PAGE 5 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-01 CITY OF MOUND VEf;DOR INVOICE DUE HOLD PRE' NO. INVOICE N~BR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER 2367843A 101.27 TONER FOR FAX 01-4140-2100 1/23/01 1/23/01 101.27 JRNL-CD 1010 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS VENDOR TOTAL 696.78 -~ 2335 OiOiOi 95.00 20Oi TYPEWRITER iiAiNTENANCE i/23/0i 1/23/01 95.00 JRNL-CD iOiO INTEGRATED OFFiCE-"fEC~0L~ VENDOR TOTAL 95.00 12350 0037585 i35.00 2001 MEMBERSHIP DUES 22-4i70-4130 1/~5/0i i/23i0i 135.00 jRmL-CD 1010 INTERNATL ASSN FIRE CHIEFS VENDOR TOTAL 135.00 J2579 1205755 393.90 WINE 71-7100-9520 1/23/01 1/23/01 393.90 JRNL-CD 1010 1205756 2,137.60 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/23/0i 1/23/01 2,137.60 JRNL-CD 1010 1205757 3,034.35 wINE 71-7i00-9520 i/23/01 1/23/01 3,034.35 JRNL-CD 1010 1207730 i/23/01 1/23/01 i70.85 1207731 30.20 1/23/01 i/23/01 1,54,.52 1207732 1,544.52 i/23/01 1/23/01 JOHNSON bROTHERS LIQUOR VENDOR IOIAL 7317.42 235.42 J25B2 0!nS~l 435.69 1/23/01 1/23/01 669.11 233.;2 010228 435.69 i/23/01 ~/23/01 669.il i?o.~5 L.I~UOR ~- ~i°°-~°o.~ ~ JRNL-CD WIVE 7Z-7~OO-952G JRNL-CD 71-7100-o510 LICUOR iGiG JRNL-CD 01-01 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE 55-5881-6100 n~_n~ ODTNC~PlF TRUE VALUE 55-5851-6110 JRNL-CD n}In~ pP1NCTPLE TRUE VALUE 55-5881-6100 01-01 INTEREST TRUE VALUE 55-5oo~-~ !010 JRNL-CD JOHNSON, PHYLLIS VENDOR TOTAL 1338.22 RE!M~HRSE PHYSICAL FITNESS JRNL-CD K2702 2702 1123101 1/23/01 65.00 KENNETH BECK VENDUN TOTAL 65.00 &,164.96 · L~YTn nlolo3 4.~-~ -- LAKE VTNJ4ETOt'IKA CONSERVATI L2775 0003046 1ST QTR 01-4140-2240 LEVY PAYMENT 01-4020-4130 1010 VENDOk TOTAL' 4164.96 226.00 2001 MEMBERSHIP J O U R N A L ~GE 6 Ap-coz-0! VENDOr, NO. INVOI£E i,MBR INVOICE DUE HOLD DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT z/23/Ol 1/23101 226.00 ~Y"OF ~0~ DE>C~IPTIOh ACCOUNT LAKE P!~NETn~KA AREA CHAM~ VENDOR TOTAL 226.00 L281111507-£0 1/23/01 1/23/01 11646 ~/23/01 1/23/01 11504 1/23/01 1/23/01 25.04 SCBA RECORD CARDS 25.04 JRNL-CD 99.51 LETTERHEAD 99.51 JRNL-CD 726.93 ST ORMWAT ER (~&A 726.93 JRNL-CD t<U~iBER 1010 Zz-~iTO-210G 1010 1010 01-4280-3100 1010 LARSON PRINTING & GRAPHICS VENDOR TOTAL L2851010201 1/23/01 1123/01 851.48 49.14 ~2-91-0! TNml 19.80 02-01-01 THRU 19.66 02-01-01 THRU 126.40 02-01-01 THRU 1.98 02-01-01 THRU 19.66 02-0!-0~ T~BII 134.10 02-01-01 THRU 7.92 02-01-01 THRU 31.24 02-01-0! THRU 01-31-02 LIABILI 01-31-02 LIABILI 01-31-02 LIABILI 01-31-02 LIABILI 01-31-02 LIABILI 01-31-02 LIABILI ~1-31-02 LIABILI 01-31-02 LIABILI 01-31-02 LIABILI 01-31-02 LIABILI 01-4020-3610 01-40~0-36i0 01-4090-3610 01-4110-3610 U1-~i40-3610 01-4150-3610 01-4190-3610 01-42SU-3O1-0-- 0i-4320-3610 01-4340-3610 137.53 02-01-01 THRU 01-31-02 LIABILI 22-~i70-361~ 1&7.05 02-01-01 THRU 01-31-02 LIABILI 71-7100-3610 . _ _ 01-31-02 LIABIL! 73-7300-3610 107.43 02-01-01 THRU 01-31-02 LIA - 1010 913.00 JRNL-CD LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TO VENDOR TOTAL 913.00 3.77 L2930 5-3090~1 1/23/01 1/23/01 3.77 LOWELL'5 AoTOHOTIVE/Z!TCO~ VENDOR TOTAL 3.77 · 1,746-45 M3030233810 1/23/01 1/23/01 1,746.45 VENDOR TOTAL 1~6.45 MARK.VII Di5~RIBOTOR 6,600.036.g00.~~ 23/01 1/23/01 6BOg .u~ M30GO 900~ 1/ VENDOR TOTAL M~sy5 CORPORATION A/T PAN GR JR~L-CD 73-7300-2310 1010 71-7100'951110 BEER jRNL-CD nl-41&O-3810~ 01.01~11 THRU 12-31-01 JRNL-L M3170000714387 30,050.67 01-01 WASTEWATER 78-7800-4230 1/23/01 1/23/01 30,050.~7 JRNL-CD 1010 00007155~5 30,050.67 02-01 WASTEWATER 78-7800-4230 1/23/01 1/23/01 30,050.67 JRNL-CD lOlO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVI* VENDOR TOTAL 60101.34 PAGE 7 AP-C02-01 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUND VEND3R INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMoUhT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER M3250 001215 438.39 1,174.08 4i~.63 1,313.83 1,361.05 8i25i0i 369.68 458.39 THRU 12-15-00 5801 BARTLETT THRU 12-15-00 4812 CUMBERLAND THRU i2-iS-00 LiqUOR STORE THRU 12-15-00 FIRE STATION THRU i2-15-00 5341 MAYWOOD ROA THRU i2-i5-00 PO6LiC WORKS 6DL THRU 12-15-00 PUBLIC WORKS BDL THRU 12-15-00 ~UBLIC WORKS BDL 01-4340-3720 01-4340-3720 22-4170-3720 01-4320-3720 0i-~28'~3720 73-7300-3720 78-7800-3720 1010 ~INNEGASCO '-" VENDOR~-TOTAE: T~r 6t80-88' M3279 010102 30.00 2001 MACA/NACA DUES, SALTER 1/23/01 1/23/01 30.00 JRNL-CD ~010 MN ANIMAL CONTROL ASSOCIA~ VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 i50.00 200i DOES HARRELL, ~cKiNLE~ 150.00 JRNL-CD i50.00 m328e 001226 CHIEFS OF POLICE M3310 010117 MINNESOTA FIRE AGENCIES 1/23/01 1/23/01 VENDDR TOTAL 8/23/01 6i2510i VENDOR YOTAL 01-4140-4130 1010 35.00 2001 MEMBERSHIP DUES 22-4170-4130 35.~G JRNL-CD 10ip 35.00 M3370 010103 1/23/0i iiZ3/Oi 210.00 03-21-00 SEMINAR, GEISE 78-7800-41!0 210.00 03-21-00 SEMINAR, KIVISTO 78-7800-4110 420.00 jRI~'~-CD 1010 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENC VENDOR TOTAL 420.00 M34~0 010111 457.00 4TH ~TR 2000 JAYKO, BRAD 81-4350-1310 1/23/01 1/23/01 457.00 JRNL-CD 1010 MN U C FUND VENDOR TOTAL 457.00 ki3470 69126 72.50 i/23/01 1/23/01 72.50 HN VALLEY TESTING LA$ORATO VENDOR TOTAL 72.50 M3611 0527 92.42 i/Z3/Oi 1/23/01 92.42 MIT-TO~N BODY AND TRUCZ P~ VENDOR TOTAL 92.~2 COLiFORH WATER TEST5 JRNL-CD 73-7300-42i5 1010 ALUMINUM SIDE TARP BOW 73-7300-2310 i0i0 M3632 000208 45.00 MUNICIPALS WINTER, CLYNE 45.00 MUNICIPALS WINTER, ROBERTS 45.00 HUNiCiPALS WINTER, DEBORD 45.00 MUNICIPALS WINTER, RAMN 15.00 MUNICIPALS WINTER, NELSON 15.GO HUNiCiPALS Wi~TER, NELSON 15.00 MUNICIPALS WINTER, NELSON 45.00 MUNICIPALS WINTER, SCHWALBE 71-7100-4120 01-4090-4120 01-4140-4100 01-4040-4120 01-4280-4110 73-7300-4110 78-7800-4110 01-4090-4120 8 P U R (i H A S E J O U R N A L AP-C02-Oi CITY OF MDUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. I~;vOICE N)ImR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTIDN ACCOUNT NdMBER 45.00 MUNICIPALS WINTER, HAWKS 01-4190-4100 45.00 MUNICIPALS WINTER, GRAND 71-7100-4120 360.00 JR:~L-Cb 1010 MUNICI-PALS VENDOR TOTAL 360.00 - N3691 202007908 883.00 03-01-01 THRU 02-26-02 DUES 01-4020-4130 - 1/23/01 1/23/01 883.00 JRNL-CD 1010 - r~ATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES VENDOR TOTAL N370i ~i0i~i : '~ 1/23/01 1/23/0I' ' mATL ¥OLU~TEER FiRE COUNCi VENDOR ?OTAL 5~.uO 2001 A~U~L mEm6ERSHiP DUES 50.00 JRNL-CD 50.00 22-~i?0-4i30 1010 N3706 010111 10.35 REIMBURESE MILEAGE 70-4270-4120 1/25/0i 1/23/01 i0.5~ JR;~L-CD i0i~ ~ELSON, JOYCE VENDOR TOTAL 10.35 N3752 010112 70.00 REGISTRATION, FORSMAN, BERENT 22-4170-4110 1/23/01 1/23/01 70.00 JRNL-CD 1010 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE VENDOR TOTAL bF;Lii; SALES, INC. P4000 ~1679032 i/Z3/01 i/23/01 71-7100-9540 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL P402i 683067 90.00 MISCELLANEOUS NON-TAXABLE 71-7100-9550 1/23/01 1/23/01 90.00 JRNL-CD 1010 6~3066 716.30 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/23/01 1/23/01 716.30 JRNL-CD 1010 70.00 1/~3/01 1/23/01 90.72 JRNL-CD 1010 VE~GR TGTAL 90.72 i60.96 MIX 160.96 JRNL-CD 160.96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS, ~ VENDOR TOTAL 806.30 --~4~3~ 36551 772.31 i/23701 1723/01 772.31 - ?i;~,~AC~E DiSTRi~UTii~6 ;E~DOR TOTAL 772.31 P4110 001226 60.00 1~-2-3/01 1-/~-3Y~i 60.00 PROFESSIONAL LAW ENFURCEME VENDOR TOTAL 60.00 CIGARETTES 71- ~100-~550 JRNL-CD 1010 2001 DUES HAWKS, DEBORD JRNL-CD 01-4140-4130 24171 917794099 916.42 WINE 71-7100-9520 1/23/01 1/23/01 916.42 JRNL-CD 1010 PAGE 9 P U R C H A S E J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF HOUND VENDOR INVOICE DalE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMSR DATE DATE STATUS ANOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER - 9178990-00 ~16173-00 918321-00 1,979.92 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/23/6z i/23/0i i,~79.¥2 JRNL-(p zulu 28.00 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 60.90 LIQUOR 7~-7~00-9510 2,512.47 LIQUOR 76.34 MI S(ELLANEOUS NON-TAXABLE 71-7100-9550 398.84 LIQUOR 71-7100-9510 1/23/0~ 1/23/0i 5~8.64 JRNL-{5 10i0 133.07 WINE 71-7100-9520 1/23/01 ~/23/01 133.07 JRNL-Cc% ' 920009-00 920010-00 920322-00 920541-00 2UALITY WINE & SPIRITS VENDOR TOTAL 6105.96 R2OS1 0011173 22.45 AIR AND OXYGEN 22-4170-2200 1/23/01 1/23/01 22.45 JRNL-CD REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO VENDOR TOTAL 22.45 .... ' .... 32 122.40 ICE 71-71GG-9550 1/23/01 1/23/01 122.40 JRNL-CD 1010 R43bO O1UZll 202.50 JAN FE~ ~ARCH 2001 DUES 01-4140-4120 1/23/G~ i/2J;Ol 202.50 ~,~u-~u ....... iOiO ROTARY CLUB OF MOUND VENDOR TOTAL 202.50 S4390 OOO131 2,576.64 01-01 LIQUOR STORE RENTAL 71-7100-3920 1/23/01 1/23/01 2,576.64 JRNL-CD !010 SHORELINE PLAZA VENDOR TOTAL 2576.64 ............. 7~3.25 2001 AN~¢UAL SERViCf AGREENENT Gi-4~20-3S00 1/23/01 1/23/01 733.25 JRNL-CD 1010 SIH?LEX TiHE RECORDER CGH~ VENDOR TOTAL 733.25 S444B 0101.01 325.00 Ol-O1 DOG KENNEL FEE 01-4140-4270 1/23/01 i/2~/01 325.00 JRNL-CD 2010 Ol0201 325.00 02-01 DOG :~ENNEL FEES 01-41~0-4270 ........~,~,v~ 1/2]/G1 32).00 JRNL-CD iOiO SPORTING BREED KENNELS VENDOR TOTAL 050.00 lo PURCHASE ~P-C02-01 CITY OF JOURNAL VENDOR it~VOI CE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE N~BR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTIOtJ ACCOUNT NUMBER PR 5~,4~1 SI9509B 701.74 END EDGE, CAPSCREW, ETC. 01-4280-2310 -- 1/23/0i 1/23/01 701.74 jFKL-CD i0i0 ST. JOSEPH E@UIPMENT INC. VENDOR TOTAL 701.74 S4600 1980882 74.85 TRAFFIC VESTS 01-4140-2270 i/23/01 1/23/01 74.85 JRNL-CD lOlO STREI£HER'S VENDOR TOTAL 74.85 T~705 001226 ~5.00 Oi-Oi wEBrSiTE 01-4520'-3i00 , '' 1/23/01 1/23/01 25.00 JRNL-CD 1010 T-CHEK SYSTEHS LLC VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 T4730 361 38.65 01-06-01 PRELIMINARY PLAT 01-2300-1096 363 44.44 01-06-01 POST OFFICE SITE 55-5879-3100 1/23/6i 1/23/0i 44.44 jENL-CD iOiO 362 42.51 01-06-01 CONDITIONAL USE PERMI 01-2300-1096 %/23/0i ii23/0i 42.51 JR,~L-CD iOiO LAKER VENDOR TOTAL 125.60 70 183654 324.00 BEER KEGS 71-7100-9530 i/23/0i 1/23/01 324.00 JRNL-CD 1010 214021 24.20 MISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE 71-7100-9550 1/23/01 1/23/01 24.20 JRNL-CD 1010 214022 3,411.80 BEER 71-7100-9530 1/23/01 1/23/01 3,411.80 JPNL-CD lOlO 214401 72.60 MISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE 7~-7100-9550 1/23/01 1/23/01 72.60 JRNL-CD 1010 21441i 7,931.10 BEER 71-7100-9530 1/23/01 1/23/01 7,931.10 JRNL-¢D 1010 214602 i47.00 MISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE 7~-7100-9550 1/23/01 1/23/01 147.00 JRNL-CD 1010 214972 .80 MISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE 71-7100-9550 1/23/01 1/23/01 .80 JRNL-CD 1010 214973 3,060.38 BEER 71-7100-9530 1/23/01 1/23/01 3,060.38 JRNL-CD 1010 215707 66.40 HISCELLANEOUS TAXABLE 71-7100-9550 1/23/01 1/23/0i 86.40 J~NL-CD 1010 215708 3,939.45 BEER 71-7100-9530 1/23/01 ~/23/01 3,939.45 JRNL-CD 1010 PAGE 11 P U R C H A S E ' J 0 U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER 215905 38.00 BEER 71-7100-9530 1/23/0i 1/23/0i SB.0O JRNL-CD lOiO THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN VENDOR TOTAL 19035.73 T4790 42059 130.79 W-PUMP ASSEMBLY 01-4280-3810 1/23/01 1/23/01 130.79 JRNL-CD 1010 THURK BROS CHEVROLET VENDOR TOTAL i30.79 TRUE VALUE T4965 267130 THYSSEN LAGERQUIST 1/23/01 1/23/01 vENDOR TOTAL ii23/0i ii2~iOi ELEVATO VENDOR TOTAL 72.21 153.84 i55.64 153.84 MARDWAR£ 0i-~280-2500 JRNL-CD 1010 01-01 ELEVATOR SERVICE JRNL-CD 01-4320-3830 1010 T4985 285775-0 1/23/01 1/23/0! 53.94 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES 22-4170-2100 53.94 JRNL-CD lOlO 284929-0 1/23/01 1/23/01 442.53 FILE BOXES' (4) 01-4140-2100 442.53 JRNL,CD 10' TWIN CITY OFFICE U 5 0.5 ~, 7042709 --US FILTER 05095 010102 UNITED STATES SUPPLY CO VENDOR TOTAL 496.47 1/23/01 1/23/01 V£NDGr9 TOTAL 1/23/01 i/2~/01 POLICE CANIN VENDOR TOTAL 915.09 50.00 SO.GO 50.00 HiSCELLANEOU$ SUPPLIES JRNL-CD 7..9- 7300- 2.~00 1010 REGION lB DUES SWENSEN, JASON 01-4140-4130 JRNL-CD 1010 U5102 010131 UNITED PRG?[RTi[S ~5492 010131 1/23/01 1/23/01 VE.~uv~ ..... TOTAL 31.95 01-01 BALBOA PARKING 01-4280-4200 31.95 01-01 BALBOA PARKING 73-7300-4200 3i.~5 Oi-Oi BALBOA PARKING 78-?GGG-4~GG 95.85 JRNL-CD 1010 g5.85 1,320.60 01-01 CLEANING BUILDING 01-4320-4210 i10.05 01-01 CLEANING BUiLDiNG 01-4260-4200 110.05 01-01 CLE&NING BUILDING 73-7300-4200 110.05 01-01 CLEANING BUILDING 78-7800-4200 1/23/01 i/~YOi 1,650.75 ~RNL-CD i~i0 WEST METRO BUILDING HAINT. VENDOR TOTAL 1~50.75 16515 001226 30.00 2001 MEMBERSHIP 01-4140-4130 ~/23/01 8/23/01 30.00 JRNL-CD 1010 ~E 12 P U R C H A S E J O U R N A L AP-C02-O1 CITY Of MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS A~.OUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER MEMA VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 16698 2163-R1 99.00 2001 SUBSCRIPTION 01-4040-4130 1/23/0! 1/2310! 99.00 JRNL-CD 1010 SHALL CITIES PUBLISHING VENDOR TOTAL 99.00 Z67G~ 001226 c/3.~0 2001 DUES HARRELL,NELSON,E.~ALD 95.00 JRNL-CD 95 PR MCPA Z6799 001226-A 8/23/01 E/23/01 VENDOA TO~AL 100.00 2001 DUES HARRELL, LENOARD i:0.00 JRNL-CD 0i-4i40-4i30 1010 01-4140-4130 i0i0 001226-B 78.00 2001 TRAINING KEY SUBSCRIPTION 01-4140-4130 ~/23/01 2/23/01 78.00 JRNL-CD i0i0 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION VLNDOR TOTAL 178.00 16804 010108 200.00 REFUND WATER METER 73-3744-0000 1/23/G1 1/23/01 200.00 JRNL-CD 1010 SOHNS, BRUCE VENDOR TOTAL 200.00 RESOLUTION #00- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF THE MOUND VISIONS 1sT ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCATED AT 5600 LYNWOOD BLVD. P & Z CASE #00-64 WI:Ilr~REAS, the applicant, MetroPlains Development LLC, have submitted an application for a preliminary plat titled Mound Visions 1't Addition. The property encompasses approximately 18.97 acres or 826,400 square feet of property located on the northwest comer of the intersection ofLynwood Blvd and Commerce Blvd.; and, WlqF~REAS, the Preliminary Plat has been reviewed under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statue and as defined by City Code Section 330:00. All proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder; and, WItEREAS, the Preliminary Plat includes 18.97 acres of land as legally described in Attachment "A" of this Resolution; and, WItEREAS, the preliminary plat consists of Lot 1, Block 1 which is proposed for commercial development, Lot 2 Block 1 which is proposed for multi-family residential development, Outlots B and C which are proposed for dedication to the City for park purposes, and Outlot A for parking purposes; and, WItEREAS, the preliminary plat anticipates that all streets and access drives will be privately owned and maintained as identified in the development plan; and, WHEREAS, Hennepin County and the City of/9lound are currently involved in discussions regarding the redesign of County Road 15 which will affect the amount of land dedicated along Commerce and Lynwood Blvd. for right-of-way purposes; and, WItEREAS, the Planning Commission, on November 15, 2000 and November 27, 2000, held public hearings pursuant to Section 330:00 of the Mound City Code of Ordinances, to consider the approval of the Mound Visions 1~t Addition Preliminary Plat; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of the Mound Visions Addition Preliminary Plat; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota approves the Preliminary Plat for Mound Visions 1't Addition with the following conditions: 1. Include additional right-of-way as requested by Hennepin County with a maximum of 25 feet dedication on Lynwood Blvd. (County Road 15) and 10 feet on Commerce Blvd. (County Road 110). 2. The name of the plat shall be"Mound Visions 1" Addition." BE IT RESOLVED that such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the Mayor and City Manager shall be conclusive showing compliance therewith by the subdivider and City Officials and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith withom further formality, all in compliance with lVrmnesota Statute Chapter 462 and the City of Mound Code of Ordinances. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember by Councilmember and seconded The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Pat Misel, Mayor Attest: City Clerk RESOLUTION #00- A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND GRANTING APPROVAL FOR REZONING OF THE "OLD SCHOOL SITE" PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5600 LYNWOOD BLVD FROM R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO "R-3" MULTII'LE FAMH,Y RESIDENTIAL PDA (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA) AND "B-I" CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AND "R-2" SINGLE AND TWO FAMILy RESIDENTIAL TO DESTINATION DISTRICT PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND RECOGNIZING VARIANCES FOR ~ 'VILLAGES BY COOK'S BAY' AND 'MOUND MARKETPLACE' P&Z CASE #00-65 AND 00-66 WHEREAS, the applicant, MetroPlains Development, r~oning applications to allow residential and commercial development of property on the "Old School" site for development projectes called "The Villages by Cooks Bay" and "Mound Marketplace"; and, WI:I'EREAS, the proposed development includes 18.97 acres of land that was previously the Westonka Community Center and ballfields and Westonka High School previously; and, WHIv~REAS, the development plan for the site calls for its development as multiple family residential and a commercial area along with land dedicated for park land dedication requirements; and, WHEREAS, The concept plan indicates 59 townhome units and 40 'flats.' The townhomes will provide a total of 4 parking spaces per unit including 2 indoor and 2 outdoor parking spaces. Underground parking will be.provided for the flats at a ratio of 1 ½ spaces per unit. An additional 40 spaces will be scattered in bays along the private streets for visitor and guest parking. All streets within the residential area of the development will be private with a 24 feet width with no on-street parking because of the need to allow emergency access on this narrowed design; and, Wlt-EREAS, as a planned development area, dimensional items such as building setbacks, lot area and width are approved and regulated under a conditional use permit. A Common Irmterest Community (CIC) will be established to govern the further replatting and use of the land as individual units; and, WHEREAS, four 'big house' fiats are shown on the eastern side of the development along Bellaire Road. The narrative talks about these units as single level with 4 units per level in these 2 - 3 story buildings. The developer indicates that the market for the flats would appeal to seniors which is a good 'fit' with the needs in Mound; and, WHEREAS, the following standards apply under the conditional use permit for the "Villages by Cook's Bay," PARCEL SIZE 12.27 ac PROPOSED UNIT # 99 DENSITY 8 units/acre zo -n G ( xIsTn G) ZONING (PROPOSED) R-3 PDA lVfinirnum Lot Width Not applicable Front Yard Setback Elm Road 60 feet Bellaire 100 feet Side Yard Setbacks As indicated on plans between buildings Rear Yard Setbacks As indicated on plans from property lines. LAND USE PLAN Downtown Residential (Medium to High Density Residential @ 7 + units/acre) SUBDMSION STREET DESIGN Ki~ht-of-way width NA- private streets Pavement width 24 feet Park Site Dedication 1.89 acres or 10% of total development land area- 18.97 acres GREEN'SPACE 57.4 percent HARDCOVEK 36.2 percent WKE~AS, building elevations for the townhomes are provided with the developmem which also detail material standards to be followed on building exteriors; and, WItEREAS, the landscape plan for the residential portion of the developmem provides a total of 145 planting units which exceeds the 99 unit minimum. Plantings consist of shade, ornamental, and coniferous varieties. The park will be planted with 24 shade trees in addition to the 9 conifers that will be preserved; and, WItEREAS, a total of 1.89 acres, 10 percem of the total site area, will be dedicated to the City as parkland. Outlots 'B' and 'C' note these lands. Tot lot play equipment will also be provided by the developer and located in Outlot 'C'; and, WHEREAS, the development proposes 67,000 square feet of commercial space called 'Mound Marketplace.' Anticipated tenants include a grocer, city liquor store, restaurants, and smaller retail shops. The buildings would be designed to consider the urban context of the downtown and the Mound Visions plan. Detailed exterior treatments, space relationships, and other design elements are provided in the development submittal which will encourage high quality building and site treatment; WHIr~REAS, the following standards apply through the conditional use permit for Mound Marketplace PARCEL SIZE 6.7 ac PROPOSED SQ. FT. OF 67,000 COMM]~RCIAL ZONING (EXISTING) B-l, R-l, R-2 ZONING (PROPOSED) ~ Destination Disu'ict PUD Miaimum Lot Size NA Minimum Lot Width NA Front Yard Setbacks- Building fronting on Lynwood Per development plan Building frontin~ on Commerce Side Yard Setbacks- Building fronting on Lynwood Per development plan West building Rear Yard Setbacks Per development {~lan LAND USE PLAN Destination DisUict SUBDMSION STREET DESIGN Streets/Drives All private access PARKING 337 spaces provided Code requires 446 spaces 9 '/2 feet by 18 feet stall Code requires 10 feet by dimension 20 feet HARDCOVER 92 percent ; and, WHF~REAS, the landscape plan for the commercial portion of the development provides a total of 95 planting units which exceeds the 67 planting unit minimum. Plantings consist of shade, ornamental, and coniferous varieties. Screening and buffering of the parking and dock areas are provided to minimize impacts on the adjacent single family neighborhood; and, WHEREAS, a total of 313 parking spaces are shown plus 24 spaces adjacent to the Pond Arena which is a ratio of 1 space for every 197 square feet of commercial floor area. City Code requires 1 space for every 150 square feet of commercial floor area or 446 spaces requiring a variance o£ 109 spaces; and, WHEREAS, the City and County are currently reviewing plans for the relocation and upgrade of County Road 15 and the intersection of County Road 110. The results of the study are not yet complete, but will take into consideration the access locations proposed by the development plan. In reviewing the development, the City has considered traffic, circulation and other aspects of the proposed project as it might affect public health, safety or welfare and imposed conditions upon the approval addressing those considerations, and WHEREAS, the development plan will convert 2 residential properties guided as Low Density Residential in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan to commercial use as regulated by the proposed Destination District PUD zoning district; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council have studied the practicability of the residential and commercial planned developments, variances, taking into consideration the requirements of the City, giving particular attention to the arrangement and location of the street, their relation to topography, water supply, sewage disposal, drainage, building arrangements, the present and future development of adjoining lands and the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan and other official controls; and, Wlt'F~REAS, the Planning Commission on November 15, 2000 and November 27, 2000, held a public hearings pursuant to lVfmnesota State Statute and Mound City Code of Ordinances, to consider the approval of the requested rezonings and development plans as proposed for "The Villages by Cook's Bay" and "Mound Marketplace"located on property descn'bed on the Attachment "A"; and, WHEREAS, the physical characteristics of the site are suitable for the type and density of development contemplated subject to the conditions imposed herein, and the proposed subdivision as conditioned is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the existing land use in the area; and, WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City plan and the regulations and the requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the City Code of Ordinances of the City of Mound. WHEREAS, at the Planning Commission has recommended City Council approval of the rezoning and conditional use permit for the information as contained in the development plans; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: Approves a Conditional Use Permit for the "The Villages by Cook's Bay" and "Mound Marketplace" with the following conditions: 1. Relocate parking spaces along the rear of the grocery store to areas close to the o o 10. 11. 12. 13. clubhouse. A pedestrian easement between building facades along Lynwood and Commerce right- of-ways be provided. Easements for recreation and maintenance of the multi-use trail system. Indicate how private streets will be lighted. Developer work with the City in developing a streetscape along Commerce and Lynwood to address landscaping, fagade, and other improvements complementary to the development of the Mound Visions Plan. All streets within the proposed developmem shall be private streets serving the residential area shall be 24 feet wide, measured from back of curb to back of' curb. Concrete curb and gutter shall be installed on all streets, drives and parking areas in both the commercial and residential areas. Applicant provide fireflow analysis prior to the completion of the final utility plans. The final plat shall include utility easements for the new sanitary sewer and watermains which will be public utilities. The final plat must also include utility easements for the existing public utilities which will remain in place. Approval of right-of-way and access drives by Hennepin County. Approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Prior to the City releasing the final plat, the Developer shall sign a development contract with the City. The development contract shall stipulate that construction of all public improvements covered by said contract shall be completed within 280 days of the City releasing the final plat. As part of the developmem contract, the Developer shall furnish the City with a performance bond or an irrevocable letter of credit or other form of security approved by the City Attorney in the mount of 125% of estimated construction costs as per plans approved by the City Engineer. The Developer shall secure and provide copies to the City's Building Official of all reviews and required permits from the lVfmnesota Department of Health and the lVfmnesota Pollution Control Agency, or any other applicable permits, prior to beginning construction. The Building Official will not authorize construction until permits are secured. The City Attorney shall examine title to the property and shall render a title opinion to the city showing the ownership status of the property prior to filing. The applicant shall provide the City Attorney a current abstract or register of property abstract for Bo Co Langdon Bay. 14. Prior to any occupancy the applicant shall secure Certificates of Occupancy from the Building Official. Certificates will not be issued for homes in the subdivision until utilities and access servicing the homes are approved by the City Engineer, Public Works Superintendent, and Building Official. 15. Developer will reimburse the City for legal, engineering and planning costs incurred for review and approval of this plat. Approves variances as follows: A variance is approved to allow the commercial parking spaces to meet 1 space per 200 square feet ratio plus a reduction of 23 spaces. variance is approved to allow the commercial parking spaces to be designed at 9 feet width and a 60 feet 6 inch isle separation. Approves the rezonings to R-3 PDA and Destination District PUD as requested. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember by Councilmember and seconded The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Pat lVlisel, Mayor Attest: City Clerk RESOLUTION #00- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A STREET VACATION OF A PORTION OF AN UNNAMED PUBLIC ALLEY ADJACENT TO LOTS 18, 19, AND 20 LYNWOLD PARK, LAKE MINNETONKA P & Z CASE #00-71 WHEREAS, the applicant, MetroPlains Development, LLC have submitted an application to a vacate portion of a public alley for purposes of developing it and the adjacent commercial property; and, WHEREAS, the alley currently serves as a driveway access to the single family residences located along the north side of Lynwood Blvd; and, WHEREAS, the portion of the alley proposed for vacation currently serves as driveway access to a single family residence located on lot 18 and a single family residence located on lots 19 and 20; and, WHEREAS, the development proposal would remove the two single family residences to allow for commercial development thus eliminating the need for the public alley; and, WHEREAS, the street vacation is legally described as: "The north 30.00 feet of Lots 18, 19, and 20, 'Lynwold Park' Lake Minnetonka, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota" WHEREAS, the development proposal will cause the relocation and reconstruction of public utilities within the easement area of the public alley, requiring the need for the City to maintain the utility easement; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to review the proposal finding that the alley would no longer be needed for public access purposes; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of the request with conditions; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota approves the street vacation as described above with the following conditions: 1. All utility easements be reserved. 2. A turn around be provided on the public alley. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: and seconded The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Pat Misel, Mayor Attest: City Clerk ij [pUBLIC NOTICES PUSLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA .......... .. NOTJG~ OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE aPPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPUCATIOH BY CONDITIONAl. USE PERMIT FOR 'MOUND MARKETPLACE' AND "THE VILLAGES BY COOK'S BAY', 5600 LYNWOOD BLVD. P&Z CASE OO65 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City C~unol o! ~e City of Mound, Idinnesom, will mN! in the Council Chambers, 5341 May~ood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, Jenuan/23, 2001 ~o consider approval development plan by conditional use permit for 'tAound Morkell=lace' and 'The Village by' Cook's Bay.* T~e hearing is part o! development proposal whict~ would create ·ingle and multiple family housing, retail c~'~nen:ial, and public pad~ amenilie$. Copies al ~%e plans are available to put~io upon request at City Hall, All a~earing at said hearing with reference to the a~o~e will be given ~he opportunity Loren Gordon (P~bti~hed in The Laker Jan. 6, 2001) · PUBUC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF A PUBUC HEAR! TO CONSIDER THE APPRO~ OF A PREUMINARY PLAT 'MOU' VISIO~ 1S1' ADDITION' FOR 'P PROPERTY LOCATED AT ';60( LYNWO00 BLVD. P&Z CASE 00-44 NOTICE IS HEREBY GNEN, ~h; City Council of ttm City of Idound. Minm wilJ mill in the Council Chamber, s, Mayw~ Road, at ~ p.m. on Tue January 23, 2001 to ~o~sider ~ appm* a preliminary plat. 'Mound Visions Addilion' for the property located at Lym.x~d ~ * · Copies of the ~ ~re available T puldic upon mfloast at City Hall. All pe appearing at said heari~ with teleran the above will be given the opiC. rtunily heard at tt~.s meebng. Lomn G~ City PI; (PulXished in The Laker,~t. $, 200 CITY OF MOUND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 CASE # 00-64 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT "MOUND VISIONS 1sT ADDITION"FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5600 LYNWOOD BLVD. P&Z CASE 00-64 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, January 23, 2001 to consider the approval of a preliminary plat, "Mound Visions 1st Addition" for the property located at 5600 Lynwood Blvd. ~ ~-I---~'~ ""~,~----7--:-~t 7. Copies of ~e plus ~e av~lable to ~e public upon request at CiW Hall. All persons appemng at said he,rig wi~ reference to the above ~11 be ~ven the oppo~W to be he~d at t~s meet~g. Loren Gordon City Planner Mailed to property owners within 350 feet of affected property on January 8, 2001. (Published in the Laker January 6, 2001) prtnted on recycled paper CITY OF MOUND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 5341 MAY1NOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 CASE # 00-65 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO coNS~D-~R-TI-IE APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR "MOUND MARKETPLACE" AND "THE VILLAGES BY COOK'S BAY", $600 LY~VOOD BLVD. P&Z CASE 00-65 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, January 23, 2001 to consider approval of a development plan by conditional use permit for "Mound Marketplace" and "The Village by Cook's Bay." The hearing is part of a development proposal which would create single and multiple family housing, retail commercial, and public park amenities. Copies of the plans are available to the public upon request at City Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Loren Gordon City Planner Mailed to property owners within 350 feet of affected property on January 8, 2001. (Published in the Laker January 6, 2001) ormtedon recycledpaper MEMORANDUM Hoisington Kocglcr Group Inc. To: Mound Planning Commission From: Loren Gordon, City Planner Date: .lanuary 4, 2001 Subject: Action on "The V'dlages by Cook's Bay" and "Mound Marketplace" CUP The Conditional Use Permit approving the development plans for the Metro Plains projects, "The Villages by Cook's Bay" and "Mound Marketplace" was motioned for approval at the November 30, 2000 meeting. Because of the insufficient time between the November 27a' and 30th meetings, the recommendation is not considered valid. This item is going to the City Council on January 23"~ and the Planning Commission needs to make recommendation to the Council on this matter. This is not a public hearing as it was closed and the action needed is to simply make a motion consistent with the November 30a' motion to move this to Council. Meeting minutes are provided indicating that motion for approval. Packet material is not provided on this matter but I will be ready to discuss this if needed. The applicant will also be present. It is Staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission make the same motion as stated on pages 7 and 8 from the November 30, 2000 meeting minutes. 123 North Third Street. Suite I00, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 3384838 pUBLIC NOTICES CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA I ~_ .... City's Comprehensive Plan dated April 11, 2000. All persons ~ppearing at said hearing · ?with reference to the above will be given the ! opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Loren Gordon City Platter .. (Published in The Laker Dec. 9, 2000) · NOTICE O~'~ PUBUC HEARING · TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF A MINOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE PROPER'TIES 1' LOCATED' AT - · .~ ~ '_ 5700 AND 5716 LTNWOOD BLYD. :;~'PID't/'S 14'117-24-44-0007 AND 14-117-24-44-0058 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, ~t'~e C!,.~ Coun~l of. the_City of Mound, Minnesota, Wll~ meet in the ~ouncil Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7.'30 p.m. on Tuesday, _.Deoa_mber lg, 2.000 to consider amending me [.;omprehens~ve Plan from Low Density R ..... fire former Westonka Schoo site and esmenl]al ~o [;)est~nation District f~ lots 18 - a ediacent residential ' - 19 and 20 1.ynwbld Park' Lake Minneton~: ~j ~ ? ..... p_m .p?ty Trom me current L..n? pm. pos. e~ arnenoment is m connec~on w~naaeveopmeNproposallorlflesiteemt ~ ...... '.. -':.~ .......... ', ' wou d rezone lhe ro for -.-7. - *, ~nEm ~umness ~-onin~ uistdcts to R-3 PDA use. i ne proposed amendment revises the * - - ~ CITY OF MOUND ' MOUND, MINNESOTA ~ - -'. NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING ~' TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF A ZONING AMENDMENT · P&Z CASE 00-65 AND 00-66 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the y Council of the City of Mound, Minnesola, II meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, December 19, 2000 to consider rezoning of - Multiple Family Planned Development Area and Destination District Planned Development Area. The hearing is part of a development proposal which would create single and multiple family housing, retail commercial, and public park amenities for the site. Copies Of the plans are available to the public upon request at City Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Loren Gordon City Planner (Published in The laker Dec. 9, 2000) CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5600 LYNWOOD BLVD. P&Z CASE 00-64 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesola, will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, December 19, 2000 to consider the approval of a preliminary Dial' 'Mound Visions Addition" for thk broperty located at 5600 Lynwcod Blvd. Copies of the plans are available to the public .upon request at City Hail. All persons appeanng at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Loren Gordon City Planner (Published in The Laker Dec. 9, 2000) UTILITY RELOCATION AGREEMENT This Utility Relocation Agreement (the" o " __ Ae,reement ) is entered into this day of 2001, by and among the City of Mound ("Mound"), the City of Minnetrista and Metro Plains Development, LL~ ("MDL"). WHEREAS, MDL is in the process of acquiring for redevelopment certain real property located in the City of Mound, County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota from Independent School District 277 also known as Westonka School District 277, which property is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Property"); WHEREAS, during its inspection and examination of the Property, MDL discovered the existence of an approximately 500 foot section of Minnetrista sanitary sewer main and Mound storm sewer main entering the Property on the northeast side in the vicinity of the comer of Alder Road and Bellaire Lane, and traveling in a southerly direction and exiting the Property at the alley located North of"Lynwold Park" (the "Utility Mains"); WHEREAS, there is no document of record indicating the existence of or easement rights with respect to the Utility Mains; and WHEREAS, to facilitate the redevelopment of the Property, MDL desires to relocate the Utility Mains, and Mound and Minnetrista are agreeable to such relocation upon the terms and conditions herein stated. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. Relocation of Utility Mains. Subject to the terms and conditions herein stated, Mound and Minnetrista hereby consent to the relocation of the Utility Mains to the approximate location indicated on the Preliminary Grading & Utility Plan dated November 17, 2000 which MDL has previously provided to Mound and Minnetrista. Such relocation shall be performed by MDL according to requirements and standards applied to other similar types of public utility mains located elsewhere within the cities of Mound or Minnetrista, respectively, which requirements and standards shall be agreed to by the parties hereto prior to the commencement of the relocation. MDL shall be responsible for 100% of the project costs associated with such relocation, including, all construction costs, all City reviews, and all costs associated with acquiring any and all permits from applicable agencies. Mound and Minnetrista shall cooperate, as necessary, in any such applications. MDL shall perform its work hereunder in a manner so as not to materially interrupt the functioning of the Utility Mains during the relocation process. 2. Inspections. MDL will be responsible for the construction management of the relocation project including necessary inspections. Mound and Minnetrista shall have the right to make inspections of such construction at any reasonable time. MDL shall provide Mound and Minnetrista with a construction timetable at the beginning of the project and any revisions to said timetable from time to time thereafter. MDL shall notify Mound and Minnetrista in advance of any inspection required under the construction contract so that Mound and Minnetrista can be present at the time of such inspection. 3. Acceptance. Upon completion of the relocation project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, Mound and Minnetrista shall accept and own their individual relocated Utility Main. Such acceptance shall constitute a full release and satisfaction of MDL's obligations under this Agreement except as specifically provided herein. 4. Permanent Easements. MDL shall dedicate, grant and convey to each Mound and Minnetrista, respectively, a permanent, non-exclusive easement over, under and across that portion of the Property to which such party's Utility Main is relocated as a part of MDL's redevelopment of said Property for the purposes of operating, using and maintaining such Utility Main (the "Easements"). The portion of the Property subject to the Easements shall extend the length of the Property between the entry and exit points of the respective Utility Mains as described above and shall be approximately twenty (20) feet in width. The Easements shall be duly recorded in form and substance satisfactory to Mound and Minnetrista, respectively, and consistent with this Agreement, as part of the final plat of the Property. utilityagmt 5. Maintenance Obligations. Upon and after the relocation of the Utility Mains under the terms of this Agreement, the Utility Mains and all related infrastructure and improvements located on the Property pursuant to the Easements shall be maintained, repaired and replaced by Mound and/or Minnetrista, as the case may be, in accordance with relevant standards applied to other similar types of public utility mains located elsewhere within the cities of Mound or Minnetrista, as the case may be, and in accordance with applicable law. If in the course of its maintenance or repair activities, either Mound or Minnetrista, or their agents or employees, disturb or damage the surface of the Property, Mound or Minnetrista, as the case may be, shall restore such areas to substantially the same condition as prior to the performance of the maintenance or repair. 6. Restrictions on Improvements. Following the completion of the initial improvements to the Property as approved by Mound, no person or entity shall install or construct any improvements on the portion of the Property subject to the Easements without the prior written consent of Mound or Minnetrista, as the case may be. If any such improvements are installed or constructed without the requisite consents, Mound and/or Minnetrista shall have the right to remove the improvements and restore the surface of the Property to substantially its prior condition, and the person or entity installing or constructing the improvements shall be obligated to reimburse Mound and/or Minnetrista, a~:the'Case may be, immediately upon demand, for all costs incurred in such restoration. 7. Acknowledgment. Neither Mound nor Minnetrista is aware of or has knowledge of any other claims of easements or other similar rights not shown on the public records with respect to the Property as of the date hereof. 8. Amendment. The Agreement may be amended with the approval of each of the parties hereto. The amendment shall be reduced to writing and signed by the parties. 9. Construction and Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, and shall be binding upon all persons or entities having or acquiring any interest in the Property, and their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. CITY OF MOUND By: Its: CITY OF MINNETKISTA By:. Its: METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT, LLC By:. Its: utilityagmt JAN-18-2001 15:47 PROM HENNEPIN CO PUBLIC WORKS TO 99524?20620 P.O1 Hennevin County FAX Transmittal TO: Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound (9~2) 472-0620 Phone: (952) 472-0609 FROM: Inter-Office: Phone: FAX: E-Mail: Robert H. Byers, P.E. Hennepin County Transportation Plann/ng 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, Minnesota 55340-5421 Mail Station N-774 (763) 745-7633 (763) 478-4000 robert.byers~co.hennepin.mn.us INumberof Pages in this Transmittal (including cover): 2 Date: In Reference To: Comments: Kandis: January 18, 2001 Follow-up Preliminary Plat Review Comments - Village by Cooks Bay CSAH-15 / CSAH-110 Attached is a copy of the letter as we discussed. The original is in the mail. Please call me if you have any questions. Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive M~lit~ l~at~ola $$340-.q421 J~N-18-2001 15:47 FROM HENNEPIN CO PUBLIC WORKS TO 99524720620 P.02 Hennet>in Countv January l$,2001 Kandis Hanson, CiD' Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road. Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Ms. Hanson: CSAH-15 (Lynwood Blvd.) / CSAH-1 I0 (Commerce Blvd.) MetroPlains Properties, Inc. - Village by Cooks Bay Preliminary Plat Submittal No. 2546 Follow-up Comments to our Letter of November 22, 2000 This letter provides an update on the progress that has been ma& on the Village by Cooks Bay preliminary plat. Our November letter to you recommended that... '~he city delay the preliminary plat approval until the completion of the traffic study and the associated roadway needs can be demrmined." Positive headway has been made since that time, and is highlighted by the following activities; County staff, City staff, and the City consulting staff met on November 27, 2000 and January 11, 2001 to discuss the plat and the associated concerns regarding the CSAH-15 / CS.~-I-110 intersection. >. On lanuary 8~', we received thc traffic study from Dax4d Braslau Associates, Inc. Hennepin Count>, has examined alternative intersection configurations, and developed a concept layout that appears to provide an adequate Level of Service for the 20-year design life. This information was presented and discussed at the January 11z meeting. ). It appears that the County and the City are in agreement with many of the geometric design elements in the proposed intersection layout. However, the layout does contain some design features that could impact local prope~ies and could affect the City's redevelopment plans south of the intersection. City staff agreed to evaluate the impacts of modified lane arrangements, raised channelization, and local property access locations. Y- The County. is continuing to refine the layout based on City concerns and other considerations. It should be recognized that the plat's location has potentially significant effects on the adjacent intersections and other nearby properties. This linkage between the plat and the surrounding area has increased the complexity of issues being addressed by the County and the City. Although important issues remain, the progress made to chte is encouraging. We appreciate your efforts in helping to resolve these issues. Bruce Polac~;k - Design Division Bob Byers - Transportation Plannin~ Division Tra_~_~ortallon Department 6(X) Prairie Drive M~lina, MN 55340-542 I ~63) 745.7500 FAX: (763) 475-~000 TDD: (763) Sincerely, Transportation Planning Engineer (763) 745-7630 Recycled Paper Planning Commission Minutes - January 8,2001 -'4~Oa~ z~i MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY JANUARY 8, 2001 Those present: Chair Geoff Michael; Commissioners: Michael Mueller, O,rvin Burma, Becky Glister, Frank Weiland, Cklair Hasse, Bill Voss. Absent: Council Liaison Bob Brown. Staff present: Planner Loren Gordon, Building Official Jon Sutherland and Recording Secretary Sue Schwalbe. Jerry Clapsaddle absent and not excused. The following Public were present: Steve Coddon Veto Hanson, Metro Plains Development John Pastuck Chair Michael welcomed the public to the meeting and offered refreshments. He then called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. APPRO VE MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 2000 MOTION by Weiland, seconded by Hasse, to approve the December 11, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. MOTION carried unanimously. APPROVE MINUTES OF MOUND JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 27, 2000. MOTION by Weiland seconded by Glister, to approve the December 27, 2000 Mound Joint Planning Commission and City Council Meeting Minutes MOTION carried unanimously. Chair Michael asked staff when the new City Council Liaison will be attending Planning Commission Meetings. Building Official Sutherland responded that the appointments will be made at the next City Council Meeting. THE ELECTION OF OFFICERS Chair Michael opened the floor for the election of officers for the year 2001. Planning Commission Minutes - January 8, 2001 ~a'%~ i~-~ MOTION by Weiland seconded by Mueller, for the election of Geoff Michaels for the Chair position of the Planning Commission for the year 2001. MOTION carried unanimously. Commission Weiland opened the nominations for vice-chair. MOTION by Weiland, to nominate Glister for vice-chair. Glister declined. MOTION dropped. MOTION by Hasse, seconded by Weiland to nominate Bill Voss for vice-chair for the year 2001. MOTION carried unanimously. DISCUSSION OF WORK RULES FOR THE UPCOMING YEAR. Chair Michael explained there were basically no changes in this years work rules. He then moved on to the discussion of changing the meeting date. Michael asked staffto explain the rationale for the change. Building Official Sutherland explained that this has been brought to staff's attention by City Manager Kandis Hanson. City Planner Loren Gordon explained that there are two reasons for suggesting a change. First, in regards to time newspaper notifications; and second; to aid in staff being more efficient in responding to applicants. Commissioner Weiland responded that he is very against changing the meeting date and questioned if it would be easier for the City Council date to change. Chair Michael questioned staff as to the response time the City Council is looking for. Sutherland explained that this was not directed by the City Council. It was suggested from the City Manager. Council Member Mueller questioned the publication dates of the newspaper and asked staff to verify notification days. Chair Michael informed staff that the Planning Commission would like to have additional time to review this suggestion and will be discussed at the next two meetings. Commissioner Voss does not feel that Mondays are a good day for meetings and would like additional information in regards to publishing legal notices. Gordon explained that annually the City Council establishes what the notification paper will be. Planning Commission Minutes - January S, 2001 ~"~A .~ MOTION by Voss, seconded by Weiland, to approve the Planning Commission Work Rules for the year 2001. MOTION carried unanimously. CASE #00-65 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT "THE VILLAGE BY COOK'S BAY" AND "MOUND MARKETPLACE" METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD AND COMMERCE The Conditional Use Permit approving the development plans for the Metro Plains projects, "The Village by Cook's Bay" and "Mound Marketplace" was motioned for approval at the November 30, 2000 meeting. Because of the insufficient time between the November 27th and 30th meetings, the recommendation is not considered valid. This item is going to the City Council on January 23, 2000 and the Planning Commission needs to make recommendation to the Council on this matter. This is not a public hearing as it was closed and the action needed is simply make a motion consistent with the November 30, 2000 motion to move this to Council. Meeting minutes are provided indicating that motion for approval Packet material is not provided on this matter but can be discussed. The applicant is present. It is Staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission make the same motion as stated from the November 30, 2000 meeting minutes. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Voss to approve the MOTION with amendment on 11-30-00. EXCERT FROM 11-30-00 MINUTES: "MOTION by Brown second by Mueller, to recommend to the City Council to accept the Planned Development Area, Conditional Use Permit, (Planning Department #00-65) as per all staff recommendations. Including the following additions: That the walkway be to the south of the pond; 1/200 spaces for parking; the commitment from Metro Plains Development to talk with Mr. Berris to continue to work with the fence and the turnaround; staff review of landscaping with neighbors and developer to insure screening/buffeting; and the Metro Plains Development Continue to work with Quest to find a proper location for the cell tower. Commissioner Mueller AMENDED the MOTION to offer a variance of 23 spaces on the 1/200; however predicated it by the width of the spaces not be less than 9 ½ feet and the back to back not less than 60 feet, 6 inches." MOTION carried unanimously. DRAFT MINUTES MOUND JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 27~ 2000 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pat Meisel with the Pledge of-Allegiance at approximately 7:30 p.w_ Those present from the City Council: Mayor P~t Meisel; Council Members: Andrea Ahrens, Mark Hanus, Leah Weycker, and Bob Brown. Staff present: City Manager Kandis Hanson and City Attorney lohn Dean. Those present from the Planning Commission: Chair Geoff Michael; Commissioners: Orvin Burma, Michael Mueller, Cklair Hasse, Becky Glister, Bill Voss, Bob Brown, and Frank Weiland. Absent: Jerry Clapsaddle. Staff present: City Planner Loren Gordon, City Engineer John Cameron, Building Official ]'on Sutherland. APPROVAL OF AGENDA WITH AN'Y RELATED AMENDMENTS John Dean proposed the actions portion of the agenda beginning with g4A, the Minor Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment: Lots 18, 19, & 20, Lynwood Park; Action on Kesolution, be removed from the agenda. Dean also recommended the CUP and Variances under the second bullet in 4B, be set for a public hearing to occur on January 23, 2001 instead of taking action on it tonight. He directed the official public notice of that hearing also be made. With respect to Items C, which is the Preliminary Plat approval, he recommended that matter also be continued to January 23, 2001, and it also be set on for public hearing and notice of that hearing be published as required by law. Under Additional Matters, Dean recommended they remain as they are currently in the draf~ of the agenda packet. MOTION by Bob Brown to approve the agenda as revised, seconded by Mark Hanus. Mayor Meisel called for a vote: Roll Call Vote: Council Member Brown Council Member Weycker Council Member ranus Council Member Ahrens Mayor Meisel: MOTION carried aye aye aye aye aye The meeting was turned over to the Planning Commission Chairman C-coif Michael for continuance of the public meeting. This portion of the meeting began at approximately 7:40. Michael thanked everyone for attending the meeting. Chairman Michael announced they had two items on the agenda. He explained that the reason for tonight's Planning Commission Meeting was because k was decided on the November 27' 2000 meeting, to hold another meeting on November 30th. There was a difference of opinion as to whether it was held in violation of the Open Meeting Laws. He stated the Planning Commission has always had open meetings, but to be sure everything is done legally, they are re-doing the meeting. Chairman Michael stated the first item on the agenda is Case #00-66, which is a zoning amendment for MetroPlains Development regarding the northwest comer of Lynwood Blvd. and Commerce Blvd. Chairman Michael opened the meeting for a motion. MOTION made by Bob Brown to go ahead and approve the plan as stated. Bill Voss seconded the motion with a discussion as to what the motion actually is. It was explained that the Planning Commission took action at the November 30* meeting in reference Case 00-65 on page 7 of today's packet. He requested the Commission to review the motion made by Mr. Brown. We are also making amendments with Case ~00-66 on page 8 of today's packet. DISCUSSION:. What we are doing is accepting the residential three PDA and the Destination District rezoning per the Plat and Development Plan that has been submitted. We will be dealing with Case #00- 66 tonight and #00-65 at a later meeting. As stated on Page 8, there was a motion by Voss and seconded by Brown to recommend to the City Council to accept Zoning Amendment and/or Kezoning per 00-66. This was to include the current K-1 District to K-3 Planning Development Area and the K-2 and B-1 to the Destination District. Lots 18, 19, and 20 are included in the minor land use plan revision as a destination district PDA consistent with the re, zoning City Council ~nd Pl~nn(n§ Comm(~'(o~ JOint M~dng 12-27-00 DRAFT It was requested that staff clarify if anything needed to be dealt with this evening regarding the logistics of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. John Dean answered that that was not on the agenda t'or the Planning Commission and the City Council removed it from consideration tonight as well. John Dean was asked if a public hearing was needed in respect to that issue and he replied that if it were to ever come back, we would need one, yes, but at this point, no. Call for Vote: Ayes 8 (no call of names) Nayes 0 Show of hands requested: Ayes $ ~ Nay.es . 0 Second item on the agenda was Case ~0-71, the Street Easement Vacation, MetroPlains Development, northwest comer of Lynwood Blvd. and Commerce Blvd. found on page 9 of the .J ~ draft minutes. Call for a motion regarding Case #00-71: MOTION made by Voss to recommend the City Council accept the Street/Easement Vacation. Motion was seconded by Weiland. · DISCUSSION: There was no discussion. ~ Ayes 8 ./ / Nayes 0 Motion carried. MOTION made by Mike Mueller and seconded by Orv Burma to adjourn. Motion passed. The Planning Commission portion of the meeting adjourned at 7:45 P.M. The continuation of the Public Hearing was turned over to Mayor Meisel and the City Council at approximately 7:46 P.M. City Council and p~nning Cornmi~ll ~oilR Me. ill§ 12-27-00 CASE ZONING AM~NDNfENT METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW COKNEK OF LYNWOOD BLVD BLVD. ;uND CONkMEKCE Mayor Melsel explained this informazlon is on p~e 4937 of the Council P~ck~. Bmcc Chamberlain explained that there were a couple of resolutions before the Council, one having to do with the Zoning Amendment and the other is for final approval of the Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment which was put before the Metropolitan Council earlier this year. Kecentty they have made special effort to look at this site in regard to the Comprehensive Plin, based on the fact there is a development proposal for this site. They essentially granted final approval to the Minor Comprehermive Plan :~mendment on ~e site uha~ [s in question. Chamberlain read the Zoning Kesolution, C,~E 00-56 which states: "A RESOLUTION OF ~ CITY COb,.-NCIL OF TItE CITY OF MOL,.'ND GRAhq'ENG APPROVAL FOR TIKE REZON~NG OF A GROL-PLNG OF PROPERTIES CONSISTANG OF ROUGhlY NEiETEF~N ACRES ANCLIiDING TStF~ "OLD SC]5OOL SITE" AT 5600 LY2fWOOD BOULE¥.%3J), AND ~ ASSOCIATED AT]tLETIC FIELDS..." This resolution will result in the Zoning amendments for the subjem property hereby approved as Destination Disu-ict PUD for Lot I except that area of Lot 1 currently known as Lots 18, 19, and 20, Lynwood Par'.<, Lake ~-W. mnetonka and 0utlot A Block 1 as described in the Preliminary Plat, Mound Vision's First edition dated November 2~. That zoning wi11 also provide for the subject prope,Wy that R3 residential PDA for Lot 2 and Outlots B and C Block I as described in the Preliminary Plat, Mound Vision's First Edition dated November 2~d He then introduced Veto Hamon from MetroPlains Development who gave a presentation. Hanson began by explaining that he was not going to be doing the detailed presentstion that has been done in prior m~tings, but will do a brief overview. Hanson indicated that this project has been ongoing for almo~ an entire year, not something that was recently started. He exTlained that in March they had their first formal meeting with staff, and various depa.m-nent heads to analyze the potential scope of tMs project. He stated this project has been through a series of meetings from both the Council and Planning Commission, department heads and stat~ a~ well a~ the City Council. Hanson explained that this plan is not just a MetroPlains plan but a combination of what the visions for Mound has been and how they have attempted to integrate those visions into the concept on this site. The plans are for a combination of both commercial and residential development. He showed how the site is broken up into four parts with commercial on the comer of Lynwood and Commerce; residential primarily located on the ball field area; the pare surrounding the perimeter on both the north and east sides; and the Ponds Arena site which is an independent property. What MetroPlains has attempted to do is to mesh all these components so the concept plan embodies the concept of embracing the City Council and Planning Commk'~ion Joint M~ing DRAFT visions for the new downtown. The idea of how the ¢ommemial addresses the intersection is such that it represents more of an urban development on the corner as opposed to a strip mall development. The plan allows additional parking for the Ponds Arena site which lacks adequate parking at this time. The residential area will be centered towards the internal portion of the site as opposed to the perimeter. The location of the park allows an opportunity for the community az large to use it, There will also be green space or a transition space bet-ween the existing neighborhoods and the new residential site. As requested by neighborhood residents, they have agr~d to provide a mrnaroul~d b the alleyway so the dead-end condition which currently exists will no longer be present, lie explained they will be purring in over .30% more landscaping than necessary which will be used for private property across the street from the site. This is where ~e access points come ouT. This area i~ primarily on Lynwood Blvd. and will provide additional screening for those residents. Hanson went on to say that they have also agreed to provide a ws_Lk-way system throughout the property to a desi~ standard that would allow an integration of'dae parks system allowing ~II access by the public at large to move throughouz the property. They will utilize the ponding condkion more as a public amenity rat. her than as a sedimentation control or nm-off control. They have agreed to work with the City in 'uheir visions for how the comer of Lynwood and Commerce should materialize so k benefits the downtown as a whole. As a result of this, there will be additional easements that will be requested by Hennepin County in order for those conditions to occur. The easements will allow for ten additional parallel parking stalls on Lyuwood. He advised the group that MetroPlains has also agreed to work with quality materials and fagade conditions as in the downtown Mound's Visions Plan. They will be utilized not only within the buildings itself but on the pavement and at the intersection points so it will have the visualization of the downtown's vision as it moves further into, the central business district. : " Hanson stated there are a number of utility relocations that will also be a pm of this that will commensurate with the design of the internalization site as well as needs that the community currently has which are looping systems which are currently not looped. This will provide a benefit to the community at large. Hanson went on to state MetroPlains has tried to listen to the visions, concerns, and requests brought to their attention. They are attempting to achieve the goals given to them by the City and Mound visions and have integrated those ideas into their plans. He explained that the density has changed drastically from where it was when they first started by at least I/3. By making these changes he believes MetroPlains has tried to make this project beneficial to the community. DRAFT Council Member Weycker slated she would like to see cut-ou~ p~ on ~lm Them was no other questions or comments by the council or staff. The Public Hearing was opened to the citizens at approximately 8:00 by Mayor MeiseI. She cxpl~ed ~ ~ ~u t~c I~ mcc~, ~ c§§ ~mer will bc u~ed u~ ~nc t~c t~ minutes each c~ will lmve to voice their opinion. She invited the citizens tn come to the podium and requested each give their ,~me and address. john Dean rer~iMed the audience that the item now open for public hem4.ug-was the Zoning Amendment. The followin~ citizens came forwa.,xi to ~ive thek opinion: Bob Pals~ou Dean Fleming .rim K.-use John Wagman Ken Custer Valar/e M,~ms Peter Meyer Michse! Durrell 0tv Burros Laures Spot~ Pauy Dodds Ken Ben'~s Paul~ Larson Bob Johnson Tom Casey 5780 Lynwood Blvd. 2825 Haisuead L~e 2830 Pine Road 5469 Bax'deu Blvd. 53 to Btvd. 2052 ~d~ew Blvi 5748 S~set Kd. ~08 Fern L~e ~m-~e resident) 3011 Isi~d View Drive ~41 Co~onwood L~e 3021 Dickem L~e 5724 L~wood Blvd. 5713 L~wood Blvd. 2928 W~edge Blvd. 2854 C~bfidge L~e Summarized Comments fi.om speaker~: In a letter fi.om an auomey to the City ~omey, it was pointed ou~ wMt i~ believed to be a confii~ of interest on behalf of the mayor taking pm in this project and voting on it. An exhibit was submitted to the City indicating the property owned by the mayor is within the notification zone. Another Council member works directly for the school district as a sub-contracton Since the school distri~ is the seller of the property, Council Member Weycker also has a conflict of interest and it is requested she not vote on the issue. This is because it is believed the money exchanged in the sale of t~i~ property would provide additional moneys for projects of the council member. DRA :T Bob Polston st~ed he would k'ke tn go on record to the Cky and Council ~ he has been asked by a number of' people in the area to repr~enl them. They do not believe this project is in the best interest in the CitT, particulm-ly for the people living within the area who h~ve paid rexes expec~ng the "qui~de" of the ~ be protected. There was no mist~e in the origir~l zoning of the property and should not be ctmnged ~'om K-1 to K-3. He went on tn s-tam they do not believe the city has h.,~dled the concerns brought before the City insofar as soil borings, soil conditions to ~ this type of development.. Mr. Polston stated they do not believe the question of lighting or sound has been adequately addressed. The ts~pe afdc ~ will be generated will be a threm, tn the s~ety md wel~=e or,he children and people of the ~r~a. There has been no tz'a~c study done other than by Hennepin County for a consu'uc~ion ~ype traffic study. This projec~ ~ within 1,000 f~t ora lake. The EQB substantially indicates in the law that nothing should ~e granted on this project prior to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet being done. Kequest the City forestall taking any action on any of these projects until the Environmental Assessment Worksheet has been returned. Encourage the Council to vote yes for this project and progress on. Does not want the city to continue sitting on their hands and not moving anywhere. This looks like a good program. Appreciate ali the hard work in trying to redevelop Mound. Technical issues are .st hand but that doesn't mean the project should not go forward. Get Mound where it needs to be. Kesident of' Mound for more than 20 years. September 1996, the Council condemned his property to dredge on the Lost Lake Channel, so he realizes what it is like to live with the development. No petitions were circulated on his beh,l¢ or calling for a special referendum and after years of negotiation with the City, he decided it was better to work with the City than fight it. He believes he made the right decision. It was for the greater good of the City though he lost some privacy. Green Space and bali fields are good to have but you have tn look at the greater picture. What is best for the citizens of Mound. Believes Mound needs housing, jobs, and more development The City should follow through and develop this property. City Cotmcil Would like to know what the increase ~ revenues to the city will be and what the increase waxes to the school district ~:mld also be helpful. This project is expensive and should have ~. ~r tax base to increase the revenues to the City so mon~ utilities can be taken care of'. For the project. Concern of water problem dating bm~k 43 years. Does not believe the land has been checked well enough to know just how soggy it gets. Ail of the water from Ormdview Blvd. drains through back-yards and down onto the field. Ail of Grand~ew Court drains down onto the field. Will new drain sewers be ruble to 8x:commodate all this ~ter. Will the developer waterproof the b~clcw~i1s oD. he homes? Keep the property, as park land. City ,Mission states must faire to re~ond to the nee~ of ali ckizens. Dis%oTees with the way the project, has been pushed throug.~_ Is legal but .not just or fair. Wait until new council is in place to vote on these issues so the new members can vote ag-ainst the project. Justice is in approving project because as a taxpayer we pay ciw ex-'penses out of one pocket and school district out of the other. The school district has a cha.uce to pick up ? dyts of income from selling this property. Not to the City (taking from one pocket and putting into the otb. er) but fi.om a developer. We bring in 99 new taxpaying families, new shoppers to the area to help the tax base. This is justice. Wetla_uds have been previously filled by in residential areas. School property was not maintain for over 22 years and has grown more mad more dilapidated. Building is not something we are losing, k's something decided years ago that we would no longer support or'maintained. Should have been renovated 30 years ago and by not doing so. the theater, =%tm, and all other amenities roached to school building was ~ven up then so it became too expensive to renovate now. No other suggestions have been ~vea for this site. Visions has worked hard. Children never went to the school property to play. Football field has been kept locked so it could not be used by the citizens. Only small area for tots was available. Parking was always been a problem in the area during football and sol,bail games. A SofkbalI field can be put a~ mother location DRAFT Bringing in new people will indirectly help the sof~bdl people. There is a new sol%ali park in Mi~etrista, which is more sophisticated. The little lots on this site ~e not necessarily something we should continue for ever, but could be relocated. Project will give retz/I base, housing base and ~x base dov~own. The high school has plans for new fields where they belong. Need to upgrade emtn~y buildings in the do'own ~'e~. - Get rid of this neg'~.ivism. Projec~ will probably cause residents to lose dl offstre~ parkin~ on Lynwood ares. Has nat yet seen the Hermepin County tr'~c study yet. l~jor buff.er will be only SO feet ~'om property. Doesn't feel there is enough trees to buff.er existing property. Concern abou: the turnaround md what it means. Once zoning is done, citizens won't have mTthing to sa7 about the plan. Opposed to how the project is proposecL Propem/will be severely impacted by proposed project. Property has ~lways been resident, isl. Covering property with black~op, concrete and crammed housing on this open space is mistake. Housing should be placed in ~reas that ne~ desper~te renovsling. Concerned about water qudiw of Lake IvFmnetonl~ this projec~ will create. Community should not have the appel'race of housing situ~ons as in the northern and southern suburbs of~-W, umeapolis. Mound should acquire land for open space and parks for its citizens md not rz_ke it When the new Hwy. 12 is under cons~on, some of that tr'~ffic may be relocated or rerouted, possibly to our downtown ar~, which would cause additio-:,! traffic safety issues. Shortage of parks and open space in Moumi Proper fiscal amly$is ha~ not been done on the pmpe~. Concern of whether the project will ~ve the City a positive cash flow. Need to do an EAW as part of analysis before voting. PUBLIC TEST~ION'Y ENDED AT It:30 P.M. by Mayor Meisel. Mayor Melee! ask~ Re council if they had any comments or que~ons of staff or the developer. Leah Weycker commented on the conflic ofimeres~ issues. She rated she does not work for the school district a_nd r. hat was made clear in the previous settlement that was just done. She star~ she is an independent conm'a~or tlmt work~ for the Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative. The school is the fiscal agent for that group m moneys are ~nneled throu~a them but that is lt. They are not her boss nor is she employed by them. Bruce Chamberlain addressed the Council rating that there were resolutions in the packet. Two updated resolutions are on their desks this evening. He asked for clarification from the City Attorney on the proper order for passage or consideration of these resolutions. Attorney John Dean agreed that the correct order would be to consider the Comprehensive Plan Resolution first and the Zoning Resolution second. Attorney Dean addressed the Mayor stating there needs to be a little bit of a diversion on the action on the matter that was before her on the Public Hearing and requested she go to the Comp Plan piece (Item A) under Addkional Mattem. Bruce Chamberlain addressed the Counc~ rating that the overall Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the Cky of Wound was passed along to the Metropolimn Council. They have been in the process of re,riewing that plan. Bruce Chamberlain read one component of the resolution' "On December I8m, the Metropolitan Council granted approvai to a Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the subject property, prior for the Metropolitan Council completing ks review of the City's entire comprehensive plan." That e~enfially gives the ability for the City Council to proceed on action for zoning. It also require~ the City Council grant final approval to this component of the Comprehensive Plan and that is the Resolution before the Council this evening, which is kern A. Bruce Chamberlain handed out an attachment that is being suggested with that Resolution. Basically defines that is in the Comprehensive Land Use plan submittal to the Metropolitan Council. It essentially shows the larger open space portion or the field portion of the site would be guided as downtown residential and the commercial pot'don of the ske (old school building) would be guided a~ auto destination district Oty Council and la,t.~i-g Commi~on Joim Me~in§ 1247-00 Chamberlain went on to explain Lots 18, 19, and 20 are not suggested for r~oning. There is no commercial building that would be constructed over those lots. It is staff's belief a.nd opinion that rezoning is not required nor is a Comprehemive Plan Amendment required for those three lots in order to proceed with the approvals necessary for this project. They are excluded from any comp plan review or zoning amendment. lohn Dean wanted to make sure there was clarificatiOn regarding the question asked regarding the process of approving the Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. lie r..ated the Planning Commission held their hearings and adopted a recommendation for this approval. The City Council then had public hearings in April or May and approved the Comprehensive Plan at that ' ........ .-' ..... time and"refe"'red'it't6'the ~t' Council in the SPring for its review. This :,s the approval that we have now received fi-om Met Council. What is being done tonight is that there is a fur',he~ provision in the ~amre that says once the plan is returned from Met Council, the City CoundI has to ~ve final approval to the plan. It doesn't require a Public liearing, the City has already gone through that process. It's simply reviewing what is .'.here which is exao',ly what the Council sent the Met Council. By giving approval to this resolution, the Council will simply be confirming that this is the Amended Comprehensive Plan as it relates to this ske. MOTION made by Bob Brown to approve the Resolution by granting final approval of a Minor Comprehensive PlanfUse Plan Amendment for the old school ske, including the athletic fields at 5600 Lynwood Blvd. The motion was seconded by A. ndrea Ab. rem. DISCUSSION: There was no discussion AYES 5 NAY'ES 0 MOTION carried Zoning issue was brought before the CoUncil'i~ John Dean. ' Mayor Meiset asked if there were any questions on the Zoning Resolution 00-66. Mark Hanus commented that one of the common themes mentioned by a number of people had to do with the draining issue in that area. He stated the Water Shed tends to not go soft on these types of corrections. He also stated he believes the drainage situation will be better a_qer the development than it is today. It was pointed out that there are future approvals that will be required. Among the two that are critical are the Condkional Use Permit and a Plat. Both drainage and ske line issues, traffic issues, etc. are appropriate considerations for both of those additional approvals. They are more of a design issue than a zoning issue. City Council and P~:~..i.~_ Cc~on Join~ Me=h~ 12-~-00 D AFT MOTION made by Bob Brown to approve the r~solution of the City Council, ~'aming approval for mzonin~ of ~ grouping of properties consistin~ of ro,,~ly 19 ~res, including the old school site at $600 Lyuwood Blvd. and the associated =hletic fields. The motion was seconded by Mark Han~. DISCUSSION: Leah Weycker commented tim she always had be~n in f~vor of saving the fie'id but when the previous referendum tim the City had did not pass, she felt she needed to move on and do what the votes were telling Mr to do. She stated some are now calling her a trader for that but her job as an elected officer is to represent the voters and as much as she wanted to s~ those fields stay, 'she believes there aze still oppormnit/es to do things for children and ~n spac~ in our downtown area. This is not an ~nd all/be all She wished the new Council the b~'t of luck ROLL CALL VOTE: Council Member Brown Coun~ Member Weycker Mayor Meiset Council Member Hanus Council ~lember Ahre. us Aye Are Are A~'e MOTION C~ried Unanimously CUP AND VARIANCES MOTION made by Mark B'~,us to continue the CUP and variances to lannary 23, 11001. The motion was seconded by Andrea Ahrens. MOTION made by Mark Hanus to also continue the Preliminary Plat to January 2.3, 200 I. The motion was seconded by Bob Brown. Call for Vote: Ayes 5 Motions Carried CITIZENS PETITION FOR EIWq]RONM]gNTAL ASSESSM]gNT WORK SH~EET Bruce Chamberlain addressed the Council that this was already filed with the Enviro-mental Quality Board. The Environmental (~hiality Board has determined t~ the Cky Council of D A, FT Mound would be the re~pomible governmental unit t~ the RGU and responsible mr preparh~ t~e ~ should one be determined to be prepared. The recornmend-~Hon in the m~end~ is to m~J~odze Ci~j Sta~ to review the AEW petition and provide s report for the January 9, 2001 Council Meefin~ on th~ petition ~d the warrmts of' it. MOTION' m.ele by Andrea Ahrens tn direct ~ to review the EAW Petition in accordance with Stste StaI~es and any other guidelines and bring a report back to the City Council on Ianuary 9a. The motion was seconded by Bob Brown. DISCUSION: There was no discussion Call for Vote: Aye~ 5 Nayez 0 MOTION carried unanimously MOTION m.~le by Andrea Ahrens tn adjourn the meeting It was seconded by Bob Brown. Call for Vote: Aye~ 5 Naye~ 0 MOTION carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned a~ 8:45 P.M. Respe~y submitted, Shirley Hawk~. MELU_T_ES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2000 Those present: Chair Geoff Michael; Commissioners: Michael Mueiler, Becky Glister, Frank Weiland, Cklair Hasse, Bill Voss, and Council Liaison Bob Brown. Absent' Excused: Orvin Burma, Absent: Jerry Clapsaddle. Staff present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Planner Loren Gordon, City Engineer John Cameron, Building Official Jon Sutherland, and Recording Secretary Sue Schwalbe. The following public were present: Ken Berres, 5724 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Rod and Virginia Mac Charles Diane Rowe, 5733 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Peter Meyer, 5748 Sunset Road, Mound Kim Anderson, 5736 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Paula Larson, 5713 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Jeff Vanault, 5717 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Peter Johnson, 3140 Priest Lane Kathy L. Anderson, KKE Architects Lawrence W. Olson, Metro Plains Development Chair Michael welcomed the public and offered refreshments. He then called the meeting to order at 8:10 p.m. Council Liaison Bob Brown said the Monday night was a very ugly meeting at the. end. This is a volunteer commission. Everyone here is freely giving of their time. i am going to single out Mr. Johnson for coming here and shaking his finger at this group of people and antagonizing them. None of these people deserve to be hostile talked to like that and it is not fair to these people who give their time. In the future, when people come up here with this hostile attitude toward these people who volunteer their time to ask this person to leave the chambers. Thank you. NOVEMBER 30, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 2 MINUTES - APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 15, 2000,MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MOTION by Voss, seconded by Weiland, to accept the November 15, 2000, Planning Commission meeting Minutes. Ayes 7 (no call of names) Nayes 0 (no call of names) Motion Carried Unanimously AGENDA CASE #00-65: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW CORNER OF LYINWOOD AND COMMERCE CASE #00-66: ZONING AMENDMENT METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT Staff has compiled a list of items regarding the Metro Plans development project raised at Planning Commission meeting Monday night. TRAFFIC AND ClRCUI,,A TION ISSUES It is somewhat a coincidence that the downtown traffic study and this development proposal are on the same time schedule. Although there are traffic impacts because of this development, the traffic study has accounted for retail commercial on this corner. A number of revisions have been made to the plan to make the traffic and circulation acceptable to staff. NOVEMBER 30, 2000 PAGE 9 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Commissioner Hasse does not agree with "piece meal" zoning~ ETIEA--SEMENT VACATION ~' / METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT // City Planner Loren Gordon stated to above information is staff's information. This is the alley behind the homes on Lynwood. Lots 18, 19, and 20 were just rezoned in your motion. The idea is to vacate this, rebuild the utilities, move a storm sewer access and a manhole back onto Lot 22 and get this whole system to work. The easement is not longer needed so we think we should get rid of it. Commissioner Weiland asked if Lots 18, 19, and 20 were owned by Metro Plains Development? Mr. Olson explained they are under a purchase options and there are purchase agreements. MOTION by Voss seconded by Weiland to recommend to the City Council to accept the Street/Easement Vacation (Planning Department #00-71) as per all staff recommendations. DISCUSSION Ayes 7 (no call of names) Nayes 0 (no call of names) Motion Carries unanimously Chair Michael indicate all correspondence in packet has been read. MOTION by Voss seconded by Weiland to adjourn meeting at 9:00 p.m. Ayes 7 (no call of names) Nayes 0 (no call of names) Motion Carries unanimously Submitted by Sue Schwalbe Date Approved by Chair Geoff Michael, Date MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2000 Those present: Chair GeoffMichael; Commissioners: Michael Mueller, Orvin Burma, Becky Glister, Frank Weiland, Cklair Hasse, Bill Voss, Jerry Clapsaddle, and Council Liaison Bob Brown. Staffpresent: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Planner Loren Gordon, Building Official Jon Sutherland, and Recording Secretary Sue Schwalbe. .-:., ~Th¢. Collo.w.~ p. ublic were present: Ken Ben'es, 5724 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Rod and Girmy MacCharles Josephine Sicheneder, 2318 Fairview Lane, Mound Marlin Sicheneder, 2318 Fairview Lane, Mound Loma Norling, 5969 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Bob Schwiderski, 5969 Lynwood., Mound John Babler, 2235 Langdon Lane, Mound Karen Babler, 2235 Langdon Lane, Mound Janelle Danielson, 6020 Chesmut Road, Mound Betty Davis, 5925 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Jo Soderlund, 5945 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Ferol Andersen, 5935 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Diane Rowe, 5933 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Brad Johnson, 5789 Elm Road, Mound Wayne Davis, 2248 Langdon Lane, Mound Mark Heeser, 5826 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Thomas, 5212 Waterbury Road, Mound Bob Johnson, 2928 Westedge Blvd., Mound Terri, 6001 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Chair Michael welcomed the public and offered rel~eshments. He then called the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m. Council Liaison Bob Brown thanked Council Member Mark Hanus for filling in for him at the November 13, 2000 Plann/ng Commission Meeting. NOVEMBER 27~ 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 18 CASE #00-64: PRELIMINARY PLAT, PUBLIC HEARING METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD AND COlVIMERCE CASE #00-65: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA, CUP PUBLIC HEARING METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW COKNER OF LYNWOOD ANT) CONkMERCE CASE #00-66: ZONING AMENDENT, PUBLIC HEAI~,."NG METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT ~ NW C.~0_ORNER OF LYNWOOD AND CONh-MERCE #00-71: STREET/EASEMENT VACATION, PUBLIC HEARING METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMESNT · Since the last Planning Commission meting, the developer has submitted additional information to complete the submittal package. The deficiencies outlines in the Planning and Engineering reports at last meeting have been addressed with this submittal. MOUND MARKET PLACE The locations 'of the grocery store and smaller retail shops have been flip-flopped since the last meeting based on conversations the developer has had with two potential grocers. This arrangement alleviates almost every issued raised by staff during the last reView including circulation, building orientation, facade treatments, driveways alignments with Church Road, loading docks, and relationships with adjacent residential homes along Lynwood Blvd., By having the smaller retail shops along Lynwood Blvd., there are opportunities to have entrances from the street and the parking lot. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 25 5. Indicate how the private streets will be lighted. 6. Developer work with the City in developing a streetscape along Commerce and Lynwood to address landscaping, fagade, and other improvements complementary to the development and the Mound Visions Plan. Staft r vacati°n 0f the alley easement as.r~ested' ... with the _de_velo.per. t.o al!o .w sp.ots for o. verflow.?, arkie, g for the Pond Area. Gordon explai the use of the parking spaces~ Maybe deed the land to the Pond Arena. The parking at the Pond is a bad situation and this does not completely correct it. Veto ~,,.~Hanson of Metro Plains explained that they are in discussion with the Pond Arena /--in r ge ards to parking. A letter of intent will be issued at the appropriate time. ~IC HEA~G '~ Peter Johnson, 3140 priest Lane, representing Pond Arena. They are continuing conversation with developer. The Lot directly west of the pond arena will be joint use parking. They are now working out the details. He is very favorable with the idea of diagonal parking on the Alder Road side of there property. Mueller: Asked Peter Johnson, the planning commission likes to "plan". The 20 feet owned by the Pond arena. This is the total green space. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 26 Bob Polston, 5784 Lynwood Blvd., Mr. Polston is a resident of the area. He and his neighbors are asking for this project to be put on hold because a number of items are not yet addressed. For example the safety issues. Mr. Polston proposes to wait for traffic study to be completed by Hennepin County. Mr. Polston also questioned if TIF is it to be used, has it been approved, are the correct soil readings taken, has the Livable Communities Act grant been approved and what about the cell phone tower? Mr. Polston is requesting this be tabled until all these issues have been addressed. City Manager Kandis Hanson explained that The Livable Communities Act Grant has been applied for administratively. It is intended to be spread across all of Mound Visions and downtown redevelopment projects to different de~ees for different portions of the project. The application was for $900,000 but it is spread across various pieces of the projects. To my knowledge it is not dedicated in any way to soil corrections. There is a piece of it dedicated to this portion of the project should it be awarded but not to soil corrections. Tom Casey, 2854 Cambridge Lane. Mr. Casey agrees with Bob Polston. Mr. Casey then read Section 330.25 in subdivision code, #7. Mr. Casey believes the traffic signal should be completed before moving ahead with ti'tis project. Beverly Payne, 5709 Lynwood Blvd., Ms. Payne is very concerned with the parking issue and does not believe the Planning Commission is addressing this issue. Ms. Payne asked what are the conditions ofrezoning? Chair Michael explained two (2) public heatings. Ms. Payne asked what is the definition of R-3 Zoning? Gordon explained that R-3 Zoning is multiple housing units. Ms. Payine recently paid for a very expensive survey and she is concerned about property values. Ms. Payne doesn't feel any of these issues have been addressed. Ms. Payne also agrees with the issues raised to Bob Polston. Ms. Payne then asked how high are the trees going to be? Diane Rowe, 5733 Lynwood Blvd. Ms. Rowe would like to address the rezoning issues as well as the traffic issues involved and the effects it may have on her property. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Ms. Rowe property is Lot 49 and the ELY 25 feet of Lot 48, Lynwold Park Lake Minnetonka. This is on the south side of Lynwood Blvd., almost directly across fi.om the proposed entry to the development. Ms. Rowe's concerns are involving traffic and feels this portion on Lynwood Blvd. is fairly quiet for a county road. When backing out of her driveway and her vision is that it will be a nightmare in the future. Also Ms. Rowe is concerned that she wi,',ll be getting headlights directed at her home which never happened before. Also she~feels the.developer is not only purchasing portions of her neighborhood but are also taking away the quaintness that drew her to this property, in the first place. Ms. Rowe asked why the entrance has to be on Lynwood Blvd., and would suggest to the developer that they consider an entrance on the opposite side of the development near Alder and Bellaire. She feels this would allow new residents to enter into an immediate neighborhood setting without driving behind a docking station and grocery store and would also eliminate the destruction of a couple of homes. If the entrance is necessary for the delivery trucks then make it as such; deliveries only which would eliminate the heavy traffic at that entrance. Ms. Rowe is a lifetime resident of Mound and has also felt the need to make improvements to the community; however, her property values will decrease because of the proposed placement of the entrance of the development. She is willing to pay that extra tax dollar to improve the city but does not agree with a decrease in the one investment in property that she owns. Ms. Rowe is a single parent and has put a lot of time, effort, and money into making her home just what it is ..... an investment. She would hate to see it take a major dive financially. Ms. Rowe doesn't feel it is justified that she personally should bear the burden of a decrease in property values as well as the inconvenience of traffic issues for the sake of improving the community. She is hopeful the developer as well as the city can assist her in arriving at a solution to this dilemma. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Paula Larson, 571 ] Lynwood Blvd., Ms. Larson has lived here almost 30 yea. rs. Ms. Larson is appalled at what is going on across the street and what is the Commission trying to do to your long term residents. Ms. Larson asked if there is a map of 100 feet or so of the properties located around this property. Gordon answered that there is an updated survey of the topography. Ms. Larson is concerned that her quality of life will be greatly reduced by the traffic and headlights. Ms. Larson questioned if we are aware of what the additional residences and grocery store effect will have on the sewer system? Cameron explained that the sanitary sewer is sized to handle this project. Also Ms. Larson asked if there will be any assessments to the property owners? Camerou explained that the City of Mound cannot guarantee what Hennepin County will do and that all the additional right-of-way will come off the north side. This is 25 feet the developer must provide to Hennepin County for a turn lane to go north. Ms. Larson questioned what are the store hours? Chair Michael explained the City cannot dictate what the store hours will be. Ms. Larson stated that Mr. Ban'is said the developer might be purchasing his property. Ms. Larson then called Kemax Realty and the realtor told her the value of her property is $155,000-165,000; however after the development it will be $95,000. Ms. Larson would like to know why do the long-term residents of Mound have to take a hit in the pocketbook and whose responsibility to maintain the pond? Gordon explained the pond is the responsibility of the Homeowners association. Judy Marshcheck, resident of Mound and is also a realtor. SEE HAi~O~. MOTION to discontinue public hearing and run meeting until 11:30 p.m. seconded by Brown for discussion purposes only. Motion to discontinue public meeting and run until 11:30 p.m. Brown second only for discussion purposes. MOTION by Voss seconded by Hasse to continue public hearing until 12:00 p.m.. Commissioner Mueller stated that there are issues that probably will not be addressed so he would like to see the public hearing and meeting be continued until the next meeting and is uncomfortable with extending meeting at this time. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 29 BROWN call for vote: AYES 8 NAYES 1 (Mueller) Motion Carded Bob Johnson, Lives in the Highlands. Mr. Johnson stated that the most important fact is that half of the Mound registered do not want to see this project. Tom Casey. Mr. Casey asked not to close the public hearing tonight because further information is forthcoming. For example the traffic study. Ken Berris 5724 Lynwood., Mr. Berris examined Chair Michael list for non- repetitives. Peter Meyer, 5748 Sunset Road. Mr. Meyer appreciates what the Planning Commission does here but note there is a common theme here tonight. More and more questions and less certainties. Mr. Meyer feels the development is too abrupt. Three out of ten residents of Mound are under 17 years of age and there is a lack of attention to this group. Chair Michael instructed Mr. Meyer to direct his comments to the items on the agenda; not the football field or soccer field etc. Mr. Meyer supports the commercial portion of the development. He is looking at the balance especially the townhomes issues. Mr. Meyer is very opposed to the rezoning and the street vacation. There is no benefit to the community. Mr. Meyer is against the preliminary plat. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Ken Ben-is, Lynwood Blvd. Mr. Berris is asking the Planning Commission for a turn around in the alleyway. The loading dock is less then 50' from his property and directly in his view. Mr. Berris questioned how the storm sewer is going to be managed in the pond area and could a fence be considered along the east side of his property. Also there are 100 year old trees are along the north side. Are these trees coming down? Hanson responded no the trees are not coming down. Mr. Berris is also concerned with the pond because it is a kid magnet. This is a safety issue. Mark Hayes, 5826 Lynwood Blvd. Mr. Hayes asked how tall are the townhomes? Hanson responded 2V2 stories, lVlr. Hayes is questioning the buffer and believes this to be too abrupt. It should be a ~adual effect in density. Linda Skorseth, 4648 Alder Road. Ms. Skorseth asked what is the rush? To rezone the property required 4 out of 5 council members to approve. There will be a new city council in January, 2000. Kim Anderson, 5736 Lynwood Blvd., Ms. Anderson requested the u'affic study needs to be completed first and how far does the traffic study include, what areas, what roads? Gordon responded that the traffic study is basically for the downtown area. Cameron added that the traffic study was ordered because of the relocation of County road 15. City Manager Kandis Hanson explained they met with County Engineers at Hennepin County to request some clarifications as per the Letter. This meeting was completed tonight at 5:00 p.m. therefore another memo could not be included at this time. Ken Ben-is, Mound evangelical Free Church. Mr. Berris stated the Church does have an agreement with the Library for parking and what does the council recommend for parking because there will be people parking on the streets from the Pond Arena all the way down to the 2020 building. Chair Michael stated the Pond has had parking problems since the beginning and the chruch has always had parking issues. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ~"~?2,~AGE 31 Bob Polston, L3rnwood Blvd., Mr. Polston has other concern in the development with the width of the street at 24 feet wide and believes there is a 28 feet wide minimum. This is a standard to comply with the city standards. Mr. Polston also stated to downsize the zoning is taking away the rights of two residents. Peter Meyer. Stated any project that you review should solve problems not create problems. Public Hearing Closed at 11:53 p.m. Commissioner Voss asked staff if we make the motion of staffrecommendation do we just make a motion on the prelim/nary plat or would the preliminary, plat include rezoning, conditional use permit and the easement vacation. Gordon suggested that the Planning Commission vote on the individual cases. Staff is recommending approval of preliminary plat, rezoning the CUP that goes with the zoning and the easement vacation with those conditions. MOTION by Voss let me explain why I am making the motion after I make the motion staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the preliminary conditions 1. Determination of right-of-way by Hermepin County. That is a big issue and would determine whether the preliminary plat would be approved if the county would go along with it. There are a number of other issues that I am also concerned with 1. Being the tower. However if the tower cannot be relocated than the developers cannot do anything about. There are a number of things to stop the project from going forward. If they don't meet the preliminary plat by the time it gets to city council. MOTION by Voss, seconded by Brown to recommend City Council approval of preliminary plat as per all of staff's recommendations. DISCUSSION Commissioner Mueller would like to see another planning commission meeting due to the late hour and numerous questions he would like discussed. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ~A~,~t.~AGE 32 VOTE ON THE CALL OF THE QUESTION by Brown ~ (5, Burma, Glister, Weiland, Voss, Brown.) Naves (3 Mueller, Michael, Hasse) Motion carried Motion to adjourn by Commissioner Mueller seconded by Commissioner Glister. PLANNING REPORT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. TO: City of Mound Staff; Planning Commission and Council FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: November 20, 2000 SUBJECT: Mound Visions 1't Addition Preliminary Plat (#00-64), Rezoning (#00-66), PDA (#00-65), and Easement Vacation (#00-71) - Supplemental Report APPLICANT: MetroPlains Development OWNER: Westonka Public School District LOCATION: NW comer ofLynwood Blvd and Commerce ZONING: Currently R-l, R-2 and B-1 proposed to change to R-3 PDA and Destination District PDA COM1REWENSIVE PLAN: Downtown Residential, Destination District, and Low Density Residential This report is intended to supplement to the November 8, 2000 Planning Report Since the last Planning Commission meeting, the developer has submitted additional information to complete the submittal package. The deficiencies outlined in the Planning and Engineering reports at last meeting have been addressed with this submittal. Mound Marketplace The locations of the grocery store and smaller retail shops have been flip-flopped since the last meeting based on conversations the developer has had with two potential grocers. This arrangement alleviates almost every issue raised by staff during the last review including circulation, building orientation, faoade treatments, driveway alignments with Church Road, loading docks, and relationships with adjacent residential homes along Lynwood. By having the smaller retail shops along Lynwood, there are opportunities to have entrances from the street and the parking lot. The building will not need to be as tall and massive which will create a more intimate feel along Lynwood. It is also demonstrated that on-street parking can be accommodated along with a boulevard and sidewalk. Architectural Design Guidelines for Mound Marketplace detail how design will be addressed. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 p. 3 #00-64, 65, 66, and 71 - The Villages by Cook'~ Bay and Mound Market£1ace Preliminary Plat, CUP, Rezoning, and Easernent vacation November 20, 2000 determination fi-om the County can be made. This oRen times comes at~er approval of the preliminary plat and is handled as a condition oflinal plat approval. Staff would like the developer to dedicate an pedestrian access easement between the right-of- way and building edge to further protect public access along Commerce and Lynwood. Parks and Trails The multi-use trail will be $ feet in width and easements will be provided to allow public use. A suggestion that was raised at the last meeting was to route the trail along the south side of the pond. The developer has indicated this is acceptable. Alley Vacation The plans show the alley on lots 18, 19 and 20 will be vacated. The preliminary plat indicates vacation of a portion of an alley to accommodate the access drive on Lynwood. All on and off- site utilities in the alley will need to be rebuilt consistent with the City Engineer's specifications. Parking A total of 313 parking spaces are shown in the commercial area at a 10 feet width. This equates to almost 1 space per 200 square feet of retail, a common standard among most metropolitan communities. The Mound code is set at 1 per 150 square feet which would require 440 spaces. Staff would concur with the developer's request. Staff would recommend isle spacing be a minimum of 62 feet. Two 90 degree parking areas are proposed in the residential area to accommodate staff's concerns regarding visitor parking. Staffwould suggest the that spaces adjacent to the rear of the grocery store be relocated around the clubhouse to better accommodate visitor parking. Pond arena parking lot is reconfigured and provides 40 parking spaces. Lighting The City code requires that commercial development lighting not exceed 0.4 foot candles at the property line. Building lighting is proposed as discussed in the Architectural Design Guidelines for Mound Marketplace. Lighting for the private pedestrian street system should be indicated. Combinations of street lights and building lighting could be used. Common Interest Community_ The Villages at Cook's Bay will be platted as a Common Interest Community (CIC). A CIC is permitted by State Statute and acts similar for platting purposes to a condominium. There will not be dedicated lot lines for the townhomes or Big Houses. Kather, a lot line will be created at interior walls for each unit. The building exteriors and land will be owned and maintained by an association. For platting purposes, the Preliminary Plat will receive approval fi'om the Planning Commission and Council and final plat will receive Council approval. Upon final locations of the 123 North Third SWeet, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 p. 5 #00-64, 65, 66, and 71 - The Villages by Cook's Bay and Mound Marketplace Preliminary Plat, CUP, Rezoning, and Easement vacation November 20, 2000 Developer work with the City in developing a streetscape along Commerce and Lynwood to address landscaping, fagade, and other improvements complementary to the development and the Mound Visions Plan. Easement Vacation Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approve vacation of the alley easemem as requested. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 ME M 0 R A ND UM DATE: November 9, 2000 TO: Jon Surherland, Planing and Zoning FROM: John Cameron, City. Engineer SUBJECT: City of Mound Metro Plains Mound Visions 1 st Addition Preliminary Plat Case No. 00-64, 00-65, and 00-66 MFP, A #12252 As requested, we have reviewed the materials submitted by Metro Plains for a major subdivision of the School District property, at the comer of Commerce Boulevard and Lynwood Boulevard and have the following comments and recommendations: Preliminary Plat The name suggested for the plat is "Mound Vision 1st Addition," with Vision singular. The plat for the new Tree Value Hardware site was called "Mound Visions Addition" with Vision plural. This plat should also use Visions. Hennepin County will most likely require this plat to be the 2nd Addition; however they do not have a requirement that the addition number be numerical, it can be spelled out. The City should decide with this plat how they would li.ke to see the addition nmnber identified and continue the procedure on all future plats for the downtown redevelopmem. The documentation submitted suggests that at least some of these units will be platted as townhomes, which require separate platted lots. The preliminary plat as submitted shows only one large lot for the entire residential area. If the intention is to plat individual lots, the plat will need to be revised to show such. Jun Sutherland, Planning and Zoning November 9, 2000 Page 2 The preliminary plat does not show any additional right-of-way to be dedicated to Hennepin County along both Commerce Boulevard (CSAH #110) and Lynwood Boulevard (CSAH #15). Hennepin County had indicated they will definitely require additional fight-of-way on Lynwood Boulevard and possibly along Commerce Boulevard. The City is currently working with Hermepin County on a redesign of the intersection, which will undoubtedly affect this property. The City Code, Section 330, requires that all existing conditions within 100 feet must be shown. This has not been done; therefore it is very difficult for Hennepin County or Mound staff to review the submittal for the affects on adjacent property. 5. The preliminary plat shows the east end of the existing alley to be vacated. This will require · additional action by me City Council and Planning Commission and requires public hearings. The City has utilities located within this alley, for which easements will need to be retained. There is also an existing City of Mirmetrista sanitary sewer forcemain and a City of Mound storm sewer line, which traverse the site between .adder Road and the alley, for which easements will be required. Preliminary Grading and Utility Plan 1. The preliminary ~ading and utility plan generally met the City's requirements. The streets with/n the development are proposed to be private. The grading plan indicates two different methods of collecting stormwater. The main north/south street that connects to the commercial area shows street drainage with catch basins on only one side. The looped street along the north a_nd west side has an inverted crown with catch basins located in the center of the street. These designs will function adequately; however they do not meet Mound's normal City street design where the street is crowned with catch basins located on both sides at the curb line. Since the City does not have an approved Stormwater Management Plan, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Disu'ict (MCWD) is still the permitting agency for the stormwater permit. Application must be made directly to the MCWD and any approval by the City of the preliminary plat must be conditional upon MCWD's ultimate approval. MCWD policy requires that the applicant receive preliminary approval from the City before they will take action on the request. We have reviewed the proposed watermain system with the Public Works Superintendent and are in general agreement with the proposed plan; however before final plans can be prepared the applicant must provide a fireflow analysis for our review. It appears there may be a shortage of hydrants, especially in the residential area. The hydrant spacing should be reviewed by the Mound Fire Department. The plan does not show any valves on the proposed watermain. Locations for valves will need to be discussed with Public Works and the City Enb4neer and added when final plans are prepared. Mound requires valves on all hydrant leads. Jon Sutherland, Planning and Zoning November 9, 2000 Page 3 5. The sanitary sewer system as presented also appears to be in general compliance with City requirements. Utility easements must be provided on the final plat for both the watermain and sanitary sewer, which will be public utilities. The sanitary sewer mains providing service for the two individual commercial buildings should remain as private lines. The entire storm sewer system, including the stormwater pond will be priv.ate, to be maintained by the Homeowner's Association and Commercial entity. The only exception will be the existing catch basins located at the southwest side of the intersection of Bellaire and Alder. These catch basins should remain on the City's present system. The most easterly sanitary sewer manhole in the alley is located in the portion of the alley proposed for vacation. It is also very close to a proposed r&taining wall and therefore we are recommending that a new manhole be built over the existing main approximately 20 feet. The unused section main and old manhole would need to be removed as part of this construction. Streets and Access The narrative accompanying the application calls for private streets 24 feet wide with no parking on either side. The plan does not specifically identify, concrete curb and gutter, however this is a standard requirement of the City whether the streets are private or public. The off street parking areas shown on the "Development Plan" do not match those shown on the "Preliminary. Grading and Utility Plan." It appears the Grading Plan may be more correct, since it shows more off street parking, which will be required with no on street parking allowed. The Development Plan needs to be revised to reflect the correct layout. 3. Any approval of the preliminary plans must be conditional upon Hennepin County's approval of the three entrances shown on the Grading Plan and Development Plan. The Grading Plan indicates new off street parking on the west side of Bellaire Lane between Aider Road and the new private street entering the site at the northeast comer of the property. The Development Plan also shows off-street parking on the south side of Elm Road. Ail costs associated with widening of the City streets to provide additional parking should be the responsibihty of the developer. The parking stalls for the Commercial area are not dimensioned; however they scale approximately 9 feet wide by 20 feet deep, which does not meet the City's required width of 10 feet (Section 350:760, subd. 2.A). The dimension of 60 feet as shown between the parking bays is at low end of the accepted standards for this distance. Our recommendation would be to look at these two distances together. If the stalls are change to ten foot wide, ms required by code, then the 60 feet is acceptable; however if nine-foot wide stalls are used (which will require a variance) then a minimum of 62 feet or 63 feet should be required between the parking bays. CITY OF MOUND p ',uc AT 5200 LYNW~U 19 AHD OR~ ~0 FEET OF LOTS ~8, , N on 'LyHWOOD PARK ~KE ..... ~u~A LOCATED GENERAL~ ~ ~- - ~.~:~,~'~Y' GNEN that ' ~T~E I~ ncn~ ' pt~ning c~m~si~ Ol ~e Ci~ ol M~, so~ will m~t in ~e council Cheers, ~0 m s~ee~easemeflL . ' ' , ~ -- ~1~ H~I NJ ~r~. Bring at sa anvm, u ....... ~e ~ will be.¢ven~:,.. ~..~. _~ , ~ard at ~s m~u~. *': ~ ,' ~ .< ,.~ . ....... ..... ~ ... ..... ~s~ Affidavit o! pub%icaflon Slate of Minnesota, county of Hennepin. Bill Holm, being drily sworn on oath, says that he is an authorized agent and employee o! the pllt)lisher of the newspaper known as THE LAKER, Mound, Minnesota, and has full k~lowledge of the facts wlfich are stated below: A.) The newspaper has complied with ali the requirements constituting qualifications as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. B.) Tire printed Street/Easement VacatLon - 5200 Lynwood which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each weekfor 1 _ successive weeks' It was first published Saturday tl~e 18th day of November 2000, and was thereafter printed and published every Saturday, to and including Saturday, the ~ day of 20~; '~' "~<~oiize~ Agent Suscribed and sworn to me on this · ember _, 20 00. t_8_t_-t"day of :.~/i!~~//l~ - By: _ ~' '- Notary Public Rate Information (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users ior comparable space: $13.45 per inch. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law lot above matter: $13.4~ (3) Rate actually charged tor above matter: $7.49 per inch. Each additional successive week: $5.44. CiTY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA CASE # 00-71 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A STREET/EASEMENT AT 5200 LYNWOOD BLVD, THE NORTH 30 FEET OF LOTS 18, 19, AND 20, "LYNWOOD PARK" LAKE MINNETONKA, LOCATED GENERALLY AT 5200 LYNWOOD BLVD P&Z CASE 00-71 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning Commission of the City of Mound, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, November 27, 2000 to consider vacation of a street/easement. Copies of the plans are available to the public upon request at City Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Rho~'da-J~'ster, Plan~'~g an~! Inspections Secretary Mailed to property owners within 350 feet of affected property on November 17, 2000. Published in the Laker, November 17, 2000. ~4~ ETROPLAINS ~ METROPLAINS PROPERTIES INC METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT LLC g t h · h e a r t I a n d November 17, 2000 City of Mound Planning Commission RE: Redevelopment of Westonka School Site Mound, MN , MetroPlains Development is subnfitting the additional enclosed information at the request of the Planning Comn'dssion and city staff in anticipation of presenting it to the Planning Commission for approval of the preliminary plat at the November 27 meeting. Enclosed please find: · Revised site plan · Revised preliminary plat · Revised survey · Revised grading/drainage plan · Landscaping plan · Detail of residential courtyard · Detail of right-of-way condition at Lynwood Blvd. · Exterior building material minimums for both conunercial and residential structures · Truck turning radius diagram · Narrative addressing private street management We believe these items will satisfy the requests of the Planning Comnfission and city staff. Please let us -know if you would like additional information. Si erely, Michelle Kaiser SPRUCE TREE CENTRE · 1600 UNIVERSITY AVE. ' 1 SUITE 212 ST. PAUL MINNESOTA 55104-3825 651 646 7848 · FAX 6SI 646 8947 · www. metroplains.com Application for STREET / EASEMENT VACATION City of Mound 534'1 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 472-0607, Fax: 472-0620 Planning Commission Date: /~'C//. City Council Date: zz) No. - 7/ Application Fee:~ City Engin~ I/hV70C) Police Dept. ,t//~/~ '-G~ Public Wor~ /~//~/~0 Fire Dept. /~/~//,~ ..Pa~s I I /''/ Distribution: Please ~rint the followin information: '.- MetroPlains Development LLC APPLICANT Name 1600 University Ave. - Suite 212 St. Paul, MN 55104 Acl~ress Phone(H) n/a ~ 651-646-7848 Lynwood Blvd. Acljacent Adm ADJACENT PROPERTY Name of Busin~ (APPLICANT'S (S) 18, 19, 20 PROPERTY) Lot Block Plat # Sub~viaon Lynwold Park PID~ ZONING Circle: R-1 R-lA (~ R-3 B-1 B-2 D~STRICT DESCRIPTION please see attached OF STRE~-T TO BE VACATED FOR REQUEST iS THERE A please attached see PUBLIC NEED FOR THIS LAND? Print Aoolicant's Name Date MEm0~U~NS I:EVBJ3~EWr, U~ Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature Data ATTACBEMENT TO STREET/EASEMENT VACATION APPLCL~ON DESCRIPTION OF STREET TO BE VACATED The street to be vacated is a portion of the public alley located directly north of the homes located along Lynwood Blvd. The legal description of the area to be vacated reads: "The north 30.00 feet of Lots 18, 19 and 20, "Lynwold Park' Lake IWumetonka, according to the recorded plat thereof; Hennepin County, Minnesota." Lots 18, 19 and 20 are owned by MetroPlains Development LLC. REASON FOR REQUEST This area, in conjunction with the residential lots 18, 19 and 20, will be re-zoned commercial in order to facilitate the new entrance into the commercial and residential developmem being propo~ for the site. IS TItERE A PUBLIC NEED FOR Ti:IlS LAND? No - The alley is not a through alley and curremly dead ends at Lot 18. The vacatio~.ofihe will move the end of the alley to behind lot 21. The owner will coordinate with the city the relocation of any public utilities fight-of-ways which may be required, such as manholes over the existing sanitary sewer. EFFECTS OF PROPOSED USE The proposed development will impact the vicinity in areas such as traffic, noise, parking, etc. Following are the steps to be taken to mitigate the impact: ARRANGEMENT · The commercial area is positioned on the existing intersection of Lynwood and Commerce Blvds. This is being done to minimize the effects of traffic, people, noise, etc. on the surrounding neighborhood. o There will be two loading docks for the commercial development. Both docks are located close to the commercial entrance off Lynwood Blvd. They will be screened from the neighborhood by both landscaping and screening walls. The docks are located in these areas to minimize track traffic through the neighborhood and development. · The proposed residential is centered in the redefined residential property. It is bounded by Bellaire Lane on the east, a public alley along the south, residential along the west and Elm Road along the north. The residential area is being positioned 'inward' so as to provide open green space between itself and the existing neighborhood. The scale of the housing is situated in footprint and height so as to integrate with neighborhood scale. Two access points are available for the residents. Both are positioned to provide minimum impact on the existing neighborhood. · Parks are arranged along the north edge of the residential property on Elm Road and along the east edge of the residential property along Bellaire Lane. The parks are placed in these locations to offer a direct connection to the existing neighborhood and the greater community for ease of access. The parks offer access to the whole community by being located along the perimeter so as to not feel internal to the new development. The parks also allow the new residential area to integrate into the e,,cisting_neighborhood. LOCATION AND WIDTH OF STREETS · All existing public streets will remain and will not be improved by the developer. · Ail streets internal to the property will be private. · Private streets are 24' edge-to edge or back-to-back. A standard city street in the community of Mound has a 28' back-to-back with parking one side. Thereby, a 24' with no parking gives equal or greater accessibility for emergency, fire and general use. · Private streets will connect to Bellaire Lane and Lynwood Blvd. DRAINAGE · All drainage for both the commercial and residential portions of the site will be contained within the site property boundaries. This will be accomplished will the construction of a storm water pond along the south edge of the site. · The pond is to be approximately 34,000 sq.ft. Required dead-storage (standing water below the pond outlet elevation) volume for this development is 2.6 acres/ft. The proposed pond size meets these requirements s i n ~/~ ETROPLAINS~ METROPLAINS PROPERTIES INC METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT LLC g I h · h · a r t i a n d November 10, 2000 City of Mound Attn: Rhonda 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Street/Easement Vacation Redevelopment of Westonka School Site I am enclosing the following for publishing and filing of the alley vacation at the above site: · Copy of application · $250 application fee · 24' x 36' copy of site plan ~ , 24' x 36' copy of survey · 24' x 26' copy of preliminary plat · reduced versions of site plan, survey and preliminary plat As I indicated in my phone message to you, please let me know if 15/16 copies of this application is needed for distribution to the appropriate parties. Please contact me with any question at (651) 523-1238. MetroPlains Development, LLC SPRUCE TREE CENTRE · 1600 UNIVERSITY AVE. · SUITE212 SE. PAUL MINNESOTA 5SI04-3825 6SI 646 7848 · FAX 6SI 646 8947 I 1]111111]111t111 I tJlil I J Iii!l' Ii!iii I 111111111111111111111111111111111111 NOVEMBER 30, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 2 MINUTES - APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 15. 2000,MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MOTION by Voss, seconded by Weiland, to accept the November 15, 2000, Planning Commission meeting Minutes. Ayes 7 (no call of names) Nayes 0 (no call of names) Motion Carried Unanimously AGENDA CASE #00-65: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ARF_A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW CORNER OF LYINWOOD AND COMMERCE CASE #00-66: ZONING AMENDMENT METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD AND COMMERCE CASE #00-71: STREET/EASEMENT VACATION METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD AND COMMERCE Staff has compiled a list of items regarding the Metro Plans development project raised at Planning Commission meeting Monday night. TRAFFIC AND ClRCULATION ISSUES It is somewhat a coincidence that the downtown traffic study and this development proposal are on the same time schedule. Although there are traffic impacts because of this development, the traffic study has accounted for retail commercial on this comer. A number of revisions have been made to the plan to make the traffic and circulation acceptable to staff. NOVEMBER 30, 2000 ?LANNIN( COMMI 51ON MEETING PAGE 3 ~ONING CHANGE The proposal to rezone the current R-1 district to R-3 PDA is tied to the development plan. If the rezoning is approved but the project does not materialize, the development plan is still applicable to the property. Anyone else wishing to develop the site would have at least two (2) options for development -1) comply with the approved development plan 2) submit a new development plan that would require revising the CUP, triggering public hearings at Planning Commission and City Council. The PDA process is a way for the City to control any development of the property regardless ownership changes. L YNWO0~ AND COMMERCE RIGHT-OF-WA Y ISSUES The County will require maximum of 25 feet of additional right-of-way dedication on County Road 15 and 10 feet on County Road 110 as part of the final plat to accommodate additional turn lanes. The County told the City in our meeting on November 27, 2000, they will not require additional right-of-way from residential properties west of the site on Lynwood Blvd. The final plat must meet the additional right-of-way requirements of Hennepin County. The county indicated to the City and the Developer at the November 27, 2000 meeting that the three entrances show on the Metro Plains Site Plan would be allowed if some type of traffic channelization is used on both County Roads 110 and 15. This could be in the form of either medians or striping, which cannot be determined until the design of the 110/15 intersection is agreed upon. The also indicated that the right-in/right-out ddve proposed on Commerce Blvd., will most likely become a right-out only exit. The design of the new intersection of County Road 15 with Commerce Blvd. Will require numerous meetings with Hennepin County before a final design can be agreed upon. ACCESS DRIVE ALONG L YNWOOD Staff believes this drive location gives the best access and entry point to the residential area. Moving the drive further east will cause conflicts with the grocery store dock area. There are some compromises with this location having single family residences across the street. Staff would suggest landscape buffering in the front yards to address headlights if the access drive stays in its present location. NOVEMBER 30, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 4 PARKING SPA CES The commercial parking area is proposing 313 spaces that is based on a 1 space per 200 square feet of retail. Cities typically have commercial standards of 1 per 150 to 250, Mound is on the high end of the scale and a 1/200 is a very typical standard. The spaces are also 10 feet wide to meet Mound code. Additional spaces could be gained at 9 and 9 ½ feet widths. A 9 feet width would add another 31 spaces or 344 total. A 9 % feet width would add 15 spaces or 328 spaces. Staff is very comfortable with the 1/200 ratio proposed and would recommend the Planning Commission support the variance to parking spaces. LETTER FROM METRO PLAINS: On Nov~;rnber 27, 2000 at the Mound Planning Commission Preliminary Plat ApproVal Meetin~o Chair Geoff Michael raised questions regarding parking the area and a plan for the Que:;t antenna on the site. Please provide this letter to the members of the Planning Commission as further explanation of our plans regarding parking and the antenna. City staff has indicated that they would support 9-foot wide parking spaces in the commercial area with a 62-foot distance between centedines or 10 foot parking spaces with 60 feet between centerlines. As the buildings have moved around to accommodate the anticipated needs of Hennepin County, the 62-foot spacing because a problem and a 10-foot wide spaces were incorporated. This dropped the total commercial parking to 313 spaces plus and additional 20 spaces for the primary use of the Ponds Arena and 10 new parallel parking spacing on Lynwood Blvd. As more information is available on the exact building locations, it is our intention to work with increasing the distance between the centerlines reducing the width of the parking spaces to 9 feet. We believe that this will provide up to 347 stalls plus the 30 spaces for Ponds and on Lynwood. These decisions would be made in conjunction with City staff. We believe this parking is adequate for the commercial needs of the development. After construction, we believe that the occasional event parking needs of the Ponds Arena and the church will have an effect on their neighbors. We are proposing that the Ponds Arena, the church, the townhome association, and retail center each appoint a responsible party for parking. The responsibility of the responsible parties would be to communication and coordinate the parking needs to minimize the effects of special events on the neighborhood and minimize the involvement of the City in these problems. NOVEMBER 30, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 5 We believe the current on street parking should be analyzed by the City to provide opportunity for additional parking for special events. Diagonal parking on Alder on the ' north side of the Ponds Arena and parking to the north and east of the new dedicated parkland are potential areas to look at. We are currently working with the Ponds Arena to draft a letter of intent for the additional parking as shown on the site plan. The intent is for this to be a long-term lease agreement with the lese rate based upon the amortiz~.tion of Metro Plains'-cost. The antenna is currently in the center o~, the residential area. We have had several meetings with Quest regarding options for the antenna. The antenna is anchored in an 8-foot concrete cylinder of 40-foot depth. Their opinion is that it cannot fall. They have indicated to us that the antenna is engineered in such a way to fold from the center of the antenna so that the top of the antenna would fall onto the base. They have further indicated that there is flexibility in location of the antenna within our site. We are currently working with City staff to determine their flexibility for relocation within the existing variance. Based upon our site plan, we think an ideal spot would be in the triangular green space behind the grocery store and adjacent to the storm drainage ponds. We have requested a letter from Quest confirming the above information and hope to present that to you on Thursday night, November 30, 2000. We will continue to respond to neighborhood requests in areas such as moving the path to the south of the pond, landscaping buffers and alley tumarounds. CORRESPONDENCE FROM ORVlN BURMA Although I told you on the phone yesterday that I was available for a special meeting of the Mound Planning Commission, a recount including dimpled ballots and pregnant chads (more like checking schedules with my wife) have revealed a conflict which I can't change. I would, however, appreciate if you could distribute the following comments to the Commission prior to or at the meeting. I am confident that the City Manager and Staff has accurately reported that the issues with the County are worked out to a point sufficient so as to not delay action on the development. NOVEMBER 30, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 6 I feel that the Commission (to the degree that the Planning Commission is required by law) has considered the traffic issues. We have been assured that Staff, the City Manager and City Engineer have discussed traffic flows with the County. ! am ok with the combined expertise of these people to work out the details of ingress and egress. As explained by the City Manager, soil correction monies are not dependent on LCA funds. This project is not different that any other project in the city. It must meet or exceed all safeguards put in place through code, ordinance or other requirements of the building inspector, engineering and other government entities, i feel that this is adequate,.~ ~assure a quality final product. 4. I feel that reasonable attention has been given to screening and other plans to minimize the impact of traffic, lights, noise, etc. I disagree with the point of neighboring property values being decreased by this project. Firstly, I don't believe that this will happen. Secondly, if the property values diminish, we have no right to deny a person or group of persons who wish to exercise their right to "reasonable use of land". 6. Rezoning resulting in increased taxes is a non-issue. Increased traffic in the area is unavoidable. The residents of the area chose to buy their property on a county highway with the potential inherent (and apparent) probability that as urban sprawl intensifies, so will traffic. It will increase regardless of the fate of this project. Quaintness of the neighborhoods was another point brought up. Ail of us would like for our neighborhoods to remain status quo. However, we would like development in someone else's neighborhood to help our tax base. I used to like to go out on my deck and look at 16 acres of woods that now is Pelican Pont. When I look out now, I see a 50" TV screen so cleady that I can determine what channel they are watching. I see boat canopies where I used to see lake. But it's progress. And it's inevitable. And it was a reasonable use of land. 9. Safety of the pond is no more an issue than any other pond in the city, or the lakeshore that we revere. Parental supervision is the answer to that issue. NOVEMBER 30, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 7 10.1 have a dilemma with the parking. Although I would like to see more spaces, I am opposed to making the spaces smaller. I could accept perhaps 9'6", but 9' is too crowded. Once again, however, the developer has worked to accommodate the Arena's needs. The church will certainly benefit from the additional spaces on Sunday mornings. Weekday and Saturday weddings, funerals, etc. may continue to be a problem. This, however, should not fall upon the shoulders of the developer to solve the Church's parking problem. My thought would be to develop as many parking spaces as possible with a 9'6" width and recommend granting a variance for the difference from the required minimum number of spaces. These spaces, combined with the other planning parking within one block of the are should suffice. CASE #00-65: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD AND COMMERCE MOTION by Brown second by Mueller, to recommend to the City Council to accept the Planned Development Area, Conditional Use Permit, (Planning Department #00-65) as per all staff recommendations. Including the following additions. That the walkway be to the south of the pond; 1/200 spaces for parking; the commitment from Metro Plains Development to talk with Mr. Berris to continue to work with the fence and the turnaround; staff review of landscaping with neighbors and developer to insure screening/buffering; and the Metro Plans Development Continue to work with Quest to find a proper location for the cell tower. DISCUSSION Commissioner Weiland asked if the shrubbery refers to the south entry ddve. Mr. Olson clarified that is correct. Commissioner Glister is concerned of the safety of the antenna. They claim the tower cannot fall and they claimed the Titanic would not sink. This antenna is 120 feet tall. NOVEMBER 30, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 8 Commissioner Mueller AMENDED the MOTION to offer a variance of 23 spaces on the 1/200; however predicated it by the width of the spaces not be less than 9 % feet and the back to back not less than 60 feet, 60 inches. AMENDMENT accepted by Brown. No further discussion Ayes 7 (no call of names) Nayes 0.(no ca, U ,~.man!es) Motion carried unanimously CASE #00-66: ZONING AMENDMENT METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD AND COMMERCE City Planner Loren Gordon stated to above information is staff's information. Rezoning R-3 planned develop area only. This plan is the only thing that can go through there. MOTION by Voss, seconded by Brown to recommend to the City Council to accept the Zoning Amendment and/or Rezoning (Planning Department #00-66) as per all staff recommendations. Including that the current R-1 district to R-3 Planning Development Area and the R-2 and B-1 to the Destination District. Lots 18, 19, and 20 are included in the minor land use plan revision as a destination distdct PDA consistent with the rezoning. DISSCUSSION: Commissioner Mueller questioned if the Comprehensive Plan can be changed this with evening with a the motion of the rezoning and if the land use portion of the comprehensive plan to includes Lot 18, 19, and 20 into a destination district. Gordon responded that yes it can. Those Lots are zoned residential the Commission has made a motion to change them to commercial destination district and the land use plan'they are shown as density residential. The land use plan should also reflect that this is the destination district so that they are consistent. This motion makes the happen. AYES 6 (no call of names) NAYES 1 (Hasse) Motion carried NOVEMBER 30, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 9 Commissioner Hasse does not agree with 'piece meal" zoning. CASE #00-71' STREET/EASEMENT VACATION METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW CORNER OF LYNWOOD AND COMMERCE City Planner Loren Gordon stated to above information is staff's information. This is the alley behind the homes on Lynwood. Lots 18, 19, and 20 were just rezoned in your motion. The idea is to vacate this, rebuild the utilities, move a storm sewer access and a manhole back onto Lot 22 and get this whole system to work. The easement is not longer needed so we think we should get rid of it. Commissioner Weiland asked if Lots 18, 19, and 20 were owned by Metro Plains Development? Mr. OIson explained they are under a purchase options and there are purchase agreements. MOTION by Voss seconded by Weiland to recommend to the City Council to accept the Street/Easement Vacation (Planning Department fl00-71) as per all staff recommendations. DISCUSSION Ayes 7 (no call of names) Nayes 0 (no call of names) Motion Carries unanimously Chair Michael indicated all correspondence in packet has been read. MOTION by Voss seconded by Weiland to adjourn meeting at 9:00 p.m. Ayes 7 (no call of names) Nayes 0 (no call of names) Motion Carries unanimously Submitted by Sue Schwalbe Date Approved by Chair Geoff Michael, Date NOTICE There will be a Special Meeting of the Mound Planning Commission at 8:05 p.m., Thursday, November 30, 2000, for the purpose of discussing and taking'action on the following land use applications as submitted by MetroPlains Development: Planned Development Area - CUP Zoning Amendment Street/Easement Vacation This is not a public hearing. Kandis Hanson City Manager '- K_3_7o ...... 1 MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2000 Those present: Chair Geoff Michael; Commissioners: Michael Mueller, Orvin Burma, Becky Glister, Frank Weiland, Cldair Hasse, Bill VosS, Jerry Clapsaddle, and Council Liaison Bob Brown. Staffpresent: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Planner Loren Gordon, Building Official Jon Sutherland, and Recording Secretary Sue Schwalbe. The following public were present: Ken Berres, 5724 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Rod and Ginny MacCharles Josephine Sicheneder, 2318 Fairview Lane, Mound Marlin Sicheneder, 2318 Fairview Lane, Mound Loma Norlmg, 5969 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Bob Schwiderski, 5969 Lynwood., Mound John Babler, 2235 Langdon Lane, Mound Karen Babler, 2235 Langdon Lane, Mound Janelle Danielson, 6020 Chestnut Road, Mound Berry Davis, 5925 .Lynwood Blvd., Mound Jo Soderlund, 5945 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Ferol Andersen, 5935 Lyuwood Blvd., Mound Diane Rowe, 5933 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Brad Johnson, 5789 Elm Road, Mound Wayne Davis, 2248 Langdon Lane, Mound Mark Heeser, 5826 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Thomas, 5212 Waterbury Road, Mound Bob Johnson, 2928 Westedge Blvd., Mound Terri, 6001 Lynwood Blvd., Mound Chair Michael welcomed the public and offered refreshments. He then called the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m. Council Liaison Bob Brown thanked Council Member Mark Hanus for filling in for h/m at the November 13, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CASE #00-64: PRELIMINARY PLAT, PUBLIC HEAKING M~TRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT N-W CORNER OF LYNW00D AND COMMERCE CASE #00-65: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AKEA, CUP PUBLIC HEARING METKO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW CORNER OF LYNW00D .&NE) COMMEKCE CASE #00-66: ZONING AMEN-DENT, PUBLIC HEAKING METKO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT NW COtLNER OF LYNWOOD AND COMMERCE CASE #00-71: STREET/EASEMENT VACATION, PUBLIC HEAK~G METKO PLAINS DEVELOPMESNT N-W CORNER OF LYNWOOD AND COMMERCE Since the last Planning Commission meting, the developer has submitted additional information to complete the submittal package. The deficiencies outlines in the Planning and Engineering reports at last meeting have been addressed with this submittal. MOUND MARKET PLA CE The locations 'of the grocery store and smaller retail shops have been flip, flopped since the last meeting based on conversations the developer has had with two potential grocers. This arrangement alleviates almost every issued raised by staff during the last review including circulation, building orientation, facade treatments, driveways alignments with Church Koad, loading docks, and relationships'with adjacent residential homes along Lynwood Blvd., By havLug the smaller retail shops along Lynwood Blvd., there are opporumities to have- entrances fi'om the street and the park/ng lot. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 19 The building will not need to be as tall and massive which will create a more intimate feel along Lynwood Blvd. It is also demonstrated that on-street parking can be accommodated along with a boulevard and sidewalk. Architectural Design Guidelines for Mound Marketplace detail how design will be addressed. LANDSCAPING. SCREENING AND B UFFER1NG The landscaping plan identifies plantings for residential, park and commercial areas of the site. City code requires 99 plantings of overstory, conifer, and ornamental varieties within the residential area to meet the minimum of one tree per dwelling unit provision. The plan provides 145 planting units in addition to existing trees that will be maintained. A total of 47 shade trees will be planted along private streets and trail segments. Ornamental trees are located in courtyards and in front of buildings. A total of 64 ornamentals are shown. Conifers will provide screening along the south and west property lines. A total of 34 are proposed. The park will be planted with 24 overstory trees in addition to 9 conifers that will be maintained along the est property lines. The commercial area will have a total of 95 plantings to satisfy the 66 planting minimum based on retail floor area. Again, conifers will be used to screen the grocery store and pond arena facades as well as the loading area of the grocery store. A total of 44 ,conifers are proposed. Shade trees are proposed for the parking area and along street boulevards. A total of 45 trees are proposed. A few ornamentals will highlight entry points along Lynwood Blvd. and Commerce Blvd. The landscape plan is labeled as schematic and staff would want to work with the developer on detailing shrubs and plantings at the foundations of the commercial buildings. AS with all developments, planting minimums of 2.5 inch caliper for deciduous and 6 feet height for conifers apply. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 20 Staff believes the developer has proposed a good landscaping plan to address many of the screerfing and buffering issues. Two Items with the landscape plan staff would recommend modifications to are boulevard plantings along the commercial areas and internal parking lot landscaping. Staff would suggest overstory planting islands at the midpoint of every other parking row. Two islands would be sufficient to help provide visual relief in the parking lot. Secondly, staff would suggest the overstory boulevard plantings along Lynwood and Commerce be relocated to suggest an urban edge. Staffwould like to work with the' developer to better define flae relationship of the building and street that is agreeable to the mound Visions Plan. The plaza area at the comer should also tie into this plan. BUIDLING MA TERIAL STANDARDS Material standards for the Village at Cook's Bay and Mound Marketplace detail exterior treatments for these buildings. These standards exceed code minimums for multi-family and commerce buildings. COUNTY ROAD 15 AND II0 RIGHT-OF-WA Y The developer is proposed to dedicate a 7 feet strip along Lynwood and Commerce to Hennepin County for right-of-way. This would appear to be acceptable to staff at this time until a determination from the County can be made. This often times comes after approval of the preliminary plat and is handled as a condition of final plat approval. Staff would like the developer to dedicate a pedestrian access easement between the right-of-way and building edge to further protect public access along Commerce and Lynwood. Continuation of public hearing on Metro Plain Development. Review by staff which is Loren Gordon: Staff has received another submittal from developer. There were a number of items staff felt were incomplete and staff requested additional information. At the staff level we feel the submittal is complete. And provide recommendations tonight. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 ~'LANNING COMMISSION MEETING ~)~~,~ PAGE 21 Commercial site: looking at preliminary plat approval tonight and an easement vacation of an alley and the preliminary plan approval of the development and residential development. Commercial portion: grocery store and a potential liquor store. A series of smaller shops along Lynwood and commerce. Staffbelieves this flip-flop is a huge improvement of the esthetics oft. he project as a whole. Guidelines have been submitted (see packet). The thing we are still trying to work out is what to do with the sidewalk edges. Trying to better define what will work the best. The urban look will set the tone for the intersection. Showed schematic drawing of the intersection, which will evolve, into the Mound Visions Project. See letter in the packet from the County regarding traffic issues and fight of way. Letter is strong is saying we have a number of concerns. The position the County seems to be talcing is workable. Everytlsng in the letter is almost worked through. The traffic situation can be accommodated. Screening and landscaping (second page of plan set) One tree per unit. Scattered around site. The park will be planted with 24 overstory trees in addition to nine conifers that will be maintained along the west property line. tlUILDING MA TERIALS STANDARDS Material standards for the Village at Cook's Bay and MOund Marketplace-detail exterior treatments for these buildings. These standards exceed code min/murns for multi-family and commerce buildings. CO UNIT ROAD 15 AND 110 RIGHT-OF- WA Y The developer is proposing to dedicate a seven feet strip along Lynwood and Commerce to Hermepin County for right-of-way. This would appear to be acceptable to staff at this t/me until a determination fi'om the County can be made. This often times comes after approval of the preliminary plat and is handled as a condition of final plat approval. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 22 Staff would like the developer to dedicate a pedestrian access easement between the right-of-way and building edge to further protect public access along Commerce and Lynwood Blvd. PARKS AND TRAILS The multi-me trail will be 8 feet in width and easements will be provided to allow public use. A .suggestion that was raised at the last meeting was to route the trail along the south side of the pond. The developer has indicated this is acceptable. ALLEY VA CA TION The plans show the alley on Lots 18, 19, and 20 will be vacated. The preliminary plat indicates vacation of a portion of an alley to accommodate the access drive on Lynwood Blvd. All on and off-site utilities in the alley will need to be rebuilt consistent with the City Engineer's specifications. A total of 313 parking spaces are shown in the commercial area at a 10 feet width. This equates to almost one space per 200 square feet of retail, a common standard among most metropolitan commun/ties. The Mound code is set at 1 per 150 square feet, wkich would require 440 spaces. Staff would concur with the developer's request. Staffwould recommend isle spacing be a m/nimum of 62 feet. Two 90-degree parking areas are proposed in the residential area to accommodate staff's concerns regarding visitor parking. Staffwould suggest that the spaces adjacent to the rear of the grocery store be relocated around the clubhouse to better accommodate visitor parking. Pond arena parking lot is reconfigured and provides 40 parking spaces. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 pLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 23 The City Code requires that commercial development lighting not exceed 0.4 candles at the property line. Building lighting is proposed as discussed in the Architectural Design Guidelines for Mound Marketplace. Lighting for the private pedestrian street system should be indicated. Combinations of streetlights and building lighting could be used. COMMON INTREST COMMUNI~ The Villages at Cook's Bay will be platted as a Common Interest Community. (CIC). A CIC is perm/ned by State Statute and acts similar for plat-ting purposes to a condominium. There will not be dedicated lot lines for the townhomes or Big Houses. Rather, lot lines will be created at interior wails for each unit. The building exteriors and land will be owned and maintained by an association. For platting purposes, the P}'eliminary Plat will receive approval from the Planning Commission and Council and final plat will receive Council approval. Upon final locations of the units, the developer will certify each un/t and file ht CIC with the Hermepin County Recorder. For a point of reference on density, if this development were platted, each unit would have an average of 5,400 square feet of lot area. This exceeds that lot area that would be required for a townhome development platted under a straight R-3 zoning district. The townhome provisions in the R-3 district require 5,000 square feet of lot are a per unit for a 3 unit building and 4,000 square feet per unit for a 6 unit building. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN An amendment to the land use plan for Lots 18, 19, and 20 will need to be made to show the land as Destination District. This can be handled at the same time as the rezoning at the Planning Commission and at Final Plat approval by the City Council. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 24 RECOMMENDATIONS PRELIMINARY PLA T Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the Preliminary Plat with the following conditions: 1. Determination of right-of-way by Hennepin County. Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the rezoning as requested. The City will also approve a minor Land Use Plan revision to show Lots 18, 19, and 20 of Lynwold Addition as Destination District Planned Unit Development consistent with the rezoning. The City will also approve a textual revision to the Downtown Kesidential designation in the Land Use Plan to better describe the development density and character. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the PDA for the Villages at Langdon Bay and the Mound Marketplace as requested with the following conditions: 1. A variance of 127 parking spaces for the commercial parking area be approved. 2. Kelocate parking spaces along the rear of the grocery store so areas close to the clubhouse. 3. A pedestrian easement between building facades along Lynwood and Commerce right-of-ways be provided. 4. Easements for recreation and maintenance of the multi-use trail system. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 25 5. Indicate how the private streets will be lighted. Developer work with the City in developing a slzeetscape along Commerce and Lynwood to address landscaping, fagade, and other improvements complementary to the development and the Mound Visions Plan. EASEMENT VA CA TION Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approve vacation of the alley easement as requested. Commissioner Brown questioned if there would be an easement or an a~eement w/th the developer to allow spots for overflow parking for the Pond Area. Gordon explained that the idea is that the developer will work out some arrangement for the use of the parking spaces. Maybe deed the land to the Pond Arena. The parldng at the Pond is a bad situation and this does not completely correct it. Vern Hanson of Metro Plains explained that they are in discussion with the Pond Arena in regards to parking. A letter of intent will be issued at the appropriate time. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC H'EARING Peter Johnson, 3140 priest Lane, representing Pond Arena. They are continuing conversation with developer. The Lot directly west of the pond arena will be joint use parking. They are now working out the details..He is Very favorable w/th the idea of diagonal park/rig on the Alder Road side of there property. Mueller: Asked Peter Johnson, the planning commission likes to "plan". The 20 feet owned by the Pond arena. This is the total green space. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING · PAGE 26 Bob Polston, 5784 Lynwood Blvd., Mr. Polston is a resident of the area. He and his neighbors are asking for this project to be put on hold because a number of items are not yet addressed. For example the safety issues. Mr. Polston proposes to wait for traffic study to be completed by Hennepin County. Mr. Polston also questioned if TIF is it to be used, has it been approved, are the correct soil readings taken, has the Livable Communities Act grant been approved and what about the cell phone tower? Mr. Polston is requesting this be tabled until all these issues have been addressed. City Manager Kandis Hanson explained that The Livable Communities Act Grant has been applied for administratively. It is intended to be spread across all of Mound Visions and downtown redevelopment projects to different degrees for different portions of the project. The application was for $900,000 but it is spread across various pieces of the projects. To my knowledge it is not dedicated in any way to soil corrections. There is a piece of it dedicated to this portion of the project should it be awarded but not to soil corrections. Tom Casey, 2854 Cambridge Lane. Mr. Casey agrees with Bob Polston. Mr. Casey then read Section 330.25 in subdivision code, #7. Mr. Casey believes the traffic signal should be completed before moving ahead with this project. Beverly Pa)me, 5709 Lynwood Blvd., Ms. Pa)me is very concerned with the parldng issue and does not believe the Planning Comm/ssion is addressing this issue. Ms. Pa)me asked what are the conditions of rezoning? Chaff' Michael explained two (2) public heatings. Ms. Pa)me asked what is the definition of R-3 Zoning? Gordon explained that R-3 Zoning is multiple housing units. Ms. Payine recently paid for a very expensive survey and she is concerned about property values. Ms. Pa)me doesn't feel any of these issues have been addressed. Ms. Pa)me also agrees with the issues raised to Bob Polston. Ms. Payne then asked how kigh are the trees going to be? Diane Rowe, 5733 Lynwood Blvd. Ms. Rowe would like to address the rezoning issues as well as the traffic issues involved and the effects it may have on her property. I~OVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ?'AGE 27 Ms. Rowe property is Lot 49 and the ELY 25 feet of Lot 48, Lynwold Park Lake Mirmetonka. This is on the south side of Lynwood Blvd., almost directly across from the proposed retry to the development. Ms. Rowe's concerns are involving traffic and feels this portion on Lynwood Blvd. is fairly quiet for a county road. When backing out of her driveway and her v/sion is that it will be a nightmare in the future. Also Ms. Rowe is concerned that she will be getting headlights directed at her home which never happened before. Also she feels the developer is not only purchasing portions of her neighborhood but are also taking away the quaintness that drew her to this property, in the first place. Ms. Rowe asked why the entrance has to be on L,vnwood Blvd., and would suggest to the developer that they consider an entrance on the opposite side of the development near Alder and Bellaire. She feels this would allow new residents to enter into an mediate neighborhood setting without driving beh/nd a docking station and grocery store and would also elirnir~ate the destruction of a couple of homes. If the entrance is necessary for the delivery trucks then make it as such; deliveries only which would eliminate the heavy traffic at that entrance. Ms. Rowe is a lifetime resident of Mound and has also felt the need to make improvements to the community; however, her property values will decrease because of the proposed placement of the entrance of the development. She is willing to pay that extra tax dollar to improve the city but does not agree with a decrease in the one investment in property that she owns. Ms. Rowe is a single parent and has put a lot of time, effort, and money into making her home just what it is ..... an investment. She would hate to see it take a major clive financially. Ms. Rowe doesn't feel it is justified that she personally should bear the burden of a decrease in property values as well as the inconvenience of traffic issues for the sake of improving the community. She is hopeful the developer as well as the city can assist her in arriving at a solution to this dilemma. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Paula Larson, 5713 Lynwood Blvd., Ms. Larson has lived here almost 30 years. Ms. Larson is appalled at what is going on across the street and what is the Commission trying to do to your long term residents. Ms. Larson asked if there is a map of 100 feet or so of the properties located around this property. Gordon answered that there is an updated survey of the topography. Ms. Larson is concerned that her quality of life will be greatly reduced by the traffic and headlights. Ms. Larson questioned if we are aware of what the additional residences and grocery store effect will have on the sewer system? Cameron explained ~at thc s~itary sewer is sized to handle this project. Also Ms. Larson asked if there will be any assessments to the property owners? Cameron explained that the City of Mound cannot guarantee what Hennepin County will do and that all the additional right-of-way will come offthe north side. This is 25 feet the developer must provide to Hennepin County for a mm lane to go none Ms. Larson questioned what are the store hours? Chair Michael explained the City cannot dictate what the store hours will be. Ms. Larson stated that Mr. Ban-is said the developer might be purchasing his property. Ms. Larson then called Kemax Kealty and the realtor told her the value of her property is $155,000-165,000; however after the development it will be $95,000. Ms. Larson would like to know why do the long-term residents of Mound have to take a hit in the pocketbook and whose responsibility to maintain the pond? Gordon explained the pond is the responsibility of the Homeowners association. Judy Marshcheck, resident of Mound and is also a realtor. SEE HA~NDOUT. MOTION to discontinue public hearing and nm meeting until 11:30 p.m. seconded by Brown for discussion purposes only. Motion to discontinue public meeting and run until 11:30 p.m. Brown second only for discussion purposes. MOTION by Voss seconded by Hasse to continue public hearing until 12:00 p.m.. Commissioner Mueller stated that there are issues that probably will not be addressed so he would like to see the public hearing and mee~iug be continued until the next meeting and is uncomfortable with extending meeting at this time. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PAGE 29 BROWN call for vote: AYES 8 NAYES 1 (Mueller) Motion Carried Bob Johnson, Lives in the Highlands. Mr. Johnson stated that the most important fact is that half of the Mound registered do not want to see this project. Tom Casey. Mr. Casey asked not to close the public heating tonight because further information is forthcoming. For example the traffic study. Ken Ben-is 5724 Lynwood., Mr. Berris examined Chair Michael list for non- repetitives. Peter Meyer, 5748 Sunset Road. Mr. Meyer appreciates what the Planning Commission does here but note there is a common theme here tonight. More and more questions and less certainties. Mr. Meyer feels the development is too abrupt. Three out of ten residents of Mound are under 17 years of age and there is a lack of attention to this group. Chair Michael instructed Mr. Meyer to direct his comments to the items on the agenda; not the football field or s0ceer field itc. · , .... : ' . :i~. Mr. Meyer supports the commercial portion of the developmem. He is looking at the balance especially the townhomes issues. Mr. Meyer is very opposed to the rezoning and the street vacation. There is no benefit to the community. Mr. Meyer is against the preliminary plat. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Ken Berris, Lynwood Blvd. Mr. Berris is asking the Planning Commission for a mm around in the alleyway. The loading dock is less then 50' from his property and directly in his view. Mr. Berris questioned how the storm sewer is going to be managed in the pond area and could a fence be considered along-the east side of kis property. Also there are 100 year old trees are along the north side. Are these trees coming down? Hanson responded no the trees are not coming down. Mr. Berris is also concerned with the pond because it is a kid magnet. This is a safety issue. Mark Hayes, 5826 Lynwood Blvd. Mr. Hayes asked how tall are the townhomcs? Hanson responded 2½ stories. Mr. Hayes is questioning the buffer and believes this to be too abrupt. It should be a ~adual effect in density. Linda Skorseth, 4(548 Alder Koad. Ms. Skorseth asked what is the rush? To rezone the property required 4 out of 5 council members to approve. There will be a new city council in January, 2000. Kim Anderson, 573(5 Lynwood Blvd., Ms. Anderson requeste, d the traffic study needs to be completed first and how far does the traffic study include, what areas, what roads? Gordon responded that the traffic study is basically for the downtown area. Cameron added that the traffic study was ordered because of the relocation of County road 15. City Manager Kandis Hanson explained they met with County Engineers at Hennepin County to request some clarifications as per the Letter.. This meeting was completed tonight at 5:00 p.m. therefore another memo could not be included at this time. Ken Berris, Mound evangelical Free Church. Mr. Bcrris stated the Church does have an agreement with the Library for parking and what does the council recommend for parking because there will be people parking on the streets from the Pond Arena all the way down to the 2020 building. Chair Michael stated the Pond has had parking problems since the beginning and the chruch has always had parking issues. NOVEMBER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Bob Polston, Lynwood Blvd., Mr. Polston has other concern in the development with the width of the street at 24 feet wide and believes there is a 28 feet wide minimum. This is a standard to comply with the city standards. Mr. Polston also stated to downsize the zoning is taking away the rights of two residents. Peter Meyer. Stated any project that you review should solve problems not create problems. Public Heating Closed at 11:53 p.m. Commissioner Voss asked staff if we make the motion of staff recommendation do we just make a motion on the prelim/nary plat or would the preliminary plat include rezoning, conditional use permit and the easement vacation. Gordon suggested that the Plarming Comm/ssion vote on the individual cases. Staff is recommending approval of preliminary plat, rezoning the CLIP that goes with the zoning and the easement vacation with those conditions. MOTION by Voss let me explain why I am making the motion after I make the motion staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the preliminary conditions 1. Determination of right-of-way by Hermepin County. That is a big issue and would determine whether the preliminary plat would be approved if the county would go along with it. There are a number of other issues that I am also concerned with 1. Being the tower. However if the tower cannot be relocated than the developers cannot do anything about. There are'a number ofth/ngs to stop the project from going forward. If they don't meet the preliminary plat by the time it gets to city council. MOTION by Voss, seconded by Brown to recommend City Council approval of preliminary plat as per all of staff's recommendations. DISCUSSION Commissioner Mueller would like to see another planning commission meeting due to the late hour and numerous questions he would like discussed. NOVEN[BER 27, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING VOTE ON THE CALL OF THE QUESTION by Brown Ay~ (5, Burma, Glister, Weilan6, Voss, Brown.) Nayes (3 MueIler, Michael Hasse) Motion carried Motion to adjourn by Commissioner Mueller seconded by Commissioner Glister. FROM : RAMALEY FAX NO. : 6512255609 Nov. 29 2000 01:59PM P1 Orvi~ Burma 3011 Ishnd View Dmz: Mountie NEN' 55364 November 29, 2000 Kandis Hanson Cin., .,'v'tmager City. of Mound 534.1 .M. aywood Road Mound, ~ 55364 Although I told you on the phone yesterday that I was avatable for a sp~i~ meeting of the Mound Plarming Corru'Ns~ a r~ount including dimpled ballots and l:n'e_m'tmt chads (more tike checking schedules with my v&fe) has revealed a ¢onfli~.'~ which I can't I would, howcv~, al:rpreci~te fi.you could distribute the following commits to thc Conun~sion prim' to or at the meeting. o I am ¢on.fidm~t th,at the CiD' *.vlan~er amd Staff has azcuratcb..' reported th~ the issues with the Cotmry a~e worked out to a point sut=fident so as to not del~' action on th= developmerrt. I feel that the Commission (m th~ degree tha~ the Planning_ Commission i3 required by taw) has considered the traffic issues. We have been assured that Sta~. ',he City _.Mmmg6u' amd C~' En._~ne~ h~e discussed traffic flows *,-ith the Count'. I am ok with the combined expertise of tlzese people to work out thc deta~ of ingress and e~ess. Aa explained by th~ City. Mmmag=, soil corrections monies ar= not d,.-pend_-mt on LCA funds. ~ proj~t i~ no different that any, other project in the .-'ir5.,. It mum meet or exceed ali safeguar& put in place tt'aough c. ode, ordinance or other requirements of the building inspector, engineering and other governing emities. I feel that this is adoquate to assure a quality final product. I feel thal reasonable attmtiou has been gb,'en to screening and other plans to ,fi, d,,ize the imp~t of traffic, lights, ncite, em. I disagree with the point ofnei.mhboring property x.-a.tues being decreased by ~ proj~t. First', I don't believe that this ~,~ happen. Se. oondl?', if the propert,.: ~,-alues dlmi, d~k, we hm,'e no right to den5' a pc~on or ~oup of persons who v, ish to exercise their right to h'easonable usc of Ix.nd". Rezo,J,~ resulting in in,eased taxes i~ a non-issue. Increased traffic in the area is unavoidable. The residents of the -..rea chose to btr:..' their prop.--cry on a count3.' highv,.m,..,/th the potential irth~t (and FROM : RAMALEY FAX NO. : 6512235609 Nov. 29 2000 01:40PM P2 apparent) larglaability that as urban sprawl intensifi~, so will ~f::t:ic. It will , incrc~.~t'ega'~. ~; of ~c fate of this I:n'oj¢ct. , 8,[ '"~ Quaintness of the neighborhood was another poim brough: up. Ali of us · 1~ ';~ would l~e for our neighborhoods to remain status qu~..However, we would like d~lopment in someone else's neighborhood to help our tax base. I used to like to go out on my deck and look at 16 acres of woods that now is Pelican Point. When I look out now, I see a 50" TV screen so clearly that I can detexmine what channel the)' are watching. I see boat canopies where I used tn s~e lake. But it's progress. And it's inevitable. And it was a reasonable use of land. 9. Safety of thc pond is no more an issue than any other pond in the ciE,,', or the lakeshore that we revere. Par~tal supervision is the ans~'e-r to that issue. I have a'dilernma ~,-ith the park~n& Akho _ugh I would like to see more spaces, I am oppo.-~:t to malting the spaces smaller. I could accept, perhaps 9'6", but 9' is too crowded. Once again, hnwe~vr, the developer has worked to accommc~latc the Arena's needs. The church will c:~'a.Lrfl3: bc--nefit from the adu:litional spaces on Sunday morning. Weekday an~ Saturday weddings, funerals, etc. ma3, continue to be a problem. This, however,-should not fall upon the shoul&.ws of the ck-veloper to solve the Church's parking problem. My tho ~ught would be to develop as man.v parking spaces as possible with a 9'6" v,idth and recommend ~anting a v~'iance for the diff'crence fi-om the requix-~l minimum number of spaces. These spaces, combined wifft the other planned parking ~.ithin one block of the area should suffice. November 27, 2000 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound MN 55364 Atten: Jon Sutherland Dear Jori: This letter is in regard to the MetroPlains Development. I would like to address the rezoning issues as well as the traffic issues involved and the effects it may have on my personal property. Jon I know you are aware of where my property is but for those members who do n~, my legal description is: Lot 49 and the ELY 25ft. of Lcg 48, Lynwold Park Lake Minnetonka. I am on the south side of Lynwood, almost directly across from the proposed entry to the development. Obviously my concerns are involving traffic as I feel this portion on Lynwood is fairly quiet for a county road. As it stands right now I back out of my driveway and my vision is that it will be a nightmare in tb~ future. Secondly, I will be getting headlights directed at my home that I never had before. The d,~,veloper is not only purchasing portions of my neighborhood they are also ~aking away the quainta:ess that drew me to this property in the first place. I would like to know why the entrance has to be on Lynwood? I would like to suggest to the developer that he consider an entrance on the opposite side of the development, near Adler and Belair. This would allow the new residents to enter into an immediate neighborhood setting without driving behind a docking station and grocery store. This would eliminate the destruction of maybe a couple &homes also. If the entrance is necessary for the delivery trucks then make it as such: deliveries only, which would eliminate the heavy traffic at that entrance. I have been a lifetime resident of Mound and have also felt the need to make improvements to our community, however, I feel my property value is going to decrease because of the proposed placement of the entrance to the development. I am willing to pay that extra tax dollar to improve the city but should l be required to take a decrease in the one investment in property I have? I am a single parent and have put a Icg of time, effort anJ money into making my home just what it i~...an investment. Only to see it take a major dive financially.' I don't feel it is justified that I personally. should bear the burden ora decrease in property value as well as the inconvenience of traffic issues for the sake of improving our community. 1 am hopeful the developer as well as the city can assist me in coming up with a solution to this dilemma. Sincerely, Diane Rowe 5733 Lynwood Blvd. Mound MN 55364 Hennevin County Kandis M. Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: Dear Ms. Hanson: November 22, 2000 CSAH-15 (Lynwood Blvd.) / CSAH-110 (Commerce Blvd.) Preliminary Plat Submittal No. 2546 MetroPlains Properties, Inc. - Village by Cooks Bay This preliminary plat review is performed in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, and MSfi62'.358, County Review of Plats. Since last spring, we have had a number of ::'discUssions With:city sthff~hd the'developer concerning this proposed development. This proposal is a key element of Mound's downtown redevelopment program and it is also affeeted by furore improvements being designed by Hermepin County as part of the CSAH-I5 realignment project scheduled for year 2002. As often happens with these types of proposals, a number of changes have occurred since the development proposal was first presented to the city and discussions were first held with the county. The proposed development has undergone a number of alterations, the city has refined their vision of how this development would fit within the overall downtown setting, and Hennepin County has come to a better understanding of what types of roadway improvements may be required to support the proposed redevelopment. There still are a number of issues that remain unresolved. A traffic study has been requested by our Design Division and initiated by the city, that would clarify the traffic characteristics and give some guidance on the design fox the intersection and roadway approaches of CSAH-15 (Lynwood Blvd.) and CSAH-110 (Commerce Blvd.). The results of ibis study are not anticipated to be available until the end of the year. We believe the issues related to the design of these two roadways are directly linked to this redevelopment proposal since right-of-way needs, access configurations, roadway and turn lane geometrics will hinge on the ~valuation of the results from the traffic study. For this reason, we recommend that the city delay the preliminary plat approval until completion of the traffic study and the associated roadway needs can be determined. If :he city should' determine that this course of action is not a via'Die alternative, our recommendations based on the information currently available to us are the following: Right-of- Way Dedication · A total of 50 foot half roadway section should be dedicated along the frontage of the property for both CSAH-15 and CSAI-I-110. · A comer right-of-way triangle should be provided on the northwest corner of CSAH-15 / CSAH- 110 (20 feet back from the comer along each roadway). This is for the comer radius and signal appurtenances. The proposed plaza appears to satisfy this requirement, however changes in the corner radius (mentioned below) might necessitate further modifications. Access It is our understanding that the city envisions both the north approach of CSAH-110 and the west approach of CSAH-15 to remain as undivided roadways. In contrast, the county believes that channelization needs to be a component of these roadway designs in order to maintain safe traffic flow and to accommodate the developer's proposed access configuration. Transportation Department 1600 l:~'~'ic l~ivc M~m. IV~-~so~ 55~40-~421 (612) 745-7000 FAX: (612) 852-6757 TDD: (612) 852-6760 If the roadway approaches remain unchannelized, county access spacing guidelines call for ¼ mile spacing for undivided minor arterial roadways. Therefore, we recommend no access be provided to CSAH-110 between Alder Road and CSAH-15. The existing pull-out accesses serving the Ice Arena would also need to be closed. The proposed entrance onto CSAH-15 fi.om the development also would not meet county access spacing guidelines, however, the proposed location is acceptable as proposed. The lower volumes on CSAH-15, traffic movement benefits (less traffic forced through thc CSAH-15 / CSAH-110 intersection), and the existing public alley access in this vicinity tend to support the proposed location as a reasonable option. Roadway (~eotnetrics · We understand the city's desire to provide parking on CSAH-15 to complement the function of the proposed development storefronts. However, the provision for safe roadway operations somewhat limits the mount of parking that can realistically be provided. No parking will be allowed on CSAH-15 in the vicinity of the intersection since the parking maneuvers could conflict with mining movements fi.om CSAH-110. Since CSAH-15 is only a 2-lane roadway, · parking maneuvers could block the one through lane of traffic and thus delayed vehicles could back into the intersection of CSAH-15 / CSAH-110. The no-parking zone should probably cover the length of at least one semi-track plus a couple of automobiles (100+ feet). · Another limiting factor on the parking, is the need to provide for a westbound fight mm lane from CSAH-15 to the development. · To maintain adequate traffic operations on CSAH-15, provisions should be considered for eastbound left tums to the site. · To improve traffic flow, the egress from the site to CSAH-15 should provide two exiting lanes to accommodate left and fight turns. · Serrd-tmck mining character/stics need to be considered in the design of the CSAH-15 / CSAH- 110 intersection. These requirements may necessitate an increase in the radius of the northwest comer (near the development plaza) and could also alTect the intersection radii and turn lane lengths at the westerly access fi.om CSAH-15 to the development. The resolution of these operational and design issues will require some additional time, thought, and discussion. The results of the traffic study will be needed before the complete picture of the roadway operations can be assembled. We believe that these considerations support the need to delay the approval of the preliminary plat. The county Plat Review Committee would be willing to meet with the city and the developer to discuss these issues prior to the plat's final approval by the city. We could also reconsider other access configurations to this development if channelization is provided on CSAH-15 and'or CSAH-110. Please contact either Dave Zetterstrom (763) 745-7643 or Bob Byers (763) 745-7633 to set up a meeting or if you have any further questions. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, James N. Grube Director, Transportation Department John Cameron - City Enginecr (MFRA. Inc.) Plat Review Conunittcc - Byers / Holtz / Johnson / Lindgrcn / Sr~cka / Zcttc'rslrom LaVcrnc Hanson Jr. - MetroPlains Development PLANNING REPORT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. TO: City of Mound Star Planning Commission and Council FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: November 20, 2000 SUBJECT: Mound Visions 1'~ Addition Preliminary Plat (#00-64), Rezoning (#00-66), PDA (#00-65), and Easement Vacation (#00-71) - Supplemental Report APPLICANT: MetroPlains Developmem OWNER: Westonka Public School District LOCATION: NW comer of Lynwood Bird and Commerce ZONING: Currently R-l, R-2 and B-1 proposed to change to P.-3 PDA and Destination District PDA COMPREHENSIV~ PLAN: Downtown Kesidential, Destination District, and Low Density l~.esidential This report is intended to supplement to the November 8, 2000 Planning Report Since the last Planning Commission meetin& the developer has submitted additional information to complete the submittal package. The deficiencies outlined in the Planning and Engineering reports at last meeting have been addressed with this submittal. Mound Marketplace The locations of the grocery store and un~er retail shops have been flip-flopped since the last meeting based on conversations the developer has had with two potential grocers. This arrangement alleviates almost every issue raised by staff during the last review including circulation, building orientation, fae, acle treatments, driveway alignments with Church Road, loading docks, and relationships with adjacent residential homes along Lynwood. By having the smaller retail shops along Lynwood, there are opportunities to have entrances f~om the street and the parking lot. The building w~l not need to be as tall and massive which will create a more intimate feel along Lynwood. It is also demor~trated that on-street parking can be accommodated along with a boulevard and sidewalk Architectural Design Guidelines for Mound Marketplace detail how design will be addressed. 123 North Third S~reet. Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 L #00-64, 65, 66, and 71 -f'he [/illages by CooIc'~ 2ay and MoundMarketplace Preliminary ,Plat, CUP. t~ezoning, and F.a~ement vacation November 20, 2000 Landscaping. Screening and Buffeting The landscaping plan identifies plantings for residential, park and commercial areas of the site. City code requires 99 plantings of overstory, conifer, and ornamental varieties within the residential area to meet the minimum of 1 tree per dwelling unit provisiom The plan provides 145 planting units in addition to existing trees that will be maintained. A total of 47 shade trees will be planted along private streets and trail segments. Ornamental trees are located in courtyards and in front of buildings. A total of 64 ornamentals are shown. Conifers will provide screening along the south and west property lines. A total of 34 are proposed. The park will be planted with 24 overstory trees in addition to 9 conifers that will be maintained along the west property line. i The commercial area will have a total of 95 plantings to satisfy the 66 planting minimum based on retail floor area. Again, conifers will be used to screen the grocery store and pond arena facades as well as the loading area of the grocery store. A total of 44 conifers are proposed. Shade trees are proposed for the parking area and along street boulevards. A total of 45 trees are proposed. A few ornamentals will highlight entry points along Lynwood and Commerce. The landscape plan is labeled as schematic and staff would want to work with the developer on detailing shrubs and plantings at the foundations of the commercial buildings. As with all developments, planting minimums of 2.5 inch caliper for deciduous and 6 feet height for conifers apply. Staff believes the developer has proposed a good landscaping plan to address many of the screening and buffeting issues. Two items with the landscape plan staff would recommend modifications to are boulevard plantings along the commercial areas and internal parking lot landscaping. Staffwould suggest overstory planting islands at the midpoint of every other parking row. Two islands would be snt~icient to help provide visual relief in the parking lot. Secondly, staff would suggest the overstory boulevard plantings along Lynwood and Commerce be relocated to suggest an urban edge. Staff would like to work with the developer to better define the relationship of the building and street that is agreeable to the Mound Visions plan. The plaza area at the corner should also tie into this plan. Building Material Standards Material standards for the V'fllage at Cook's Bay and Mound Marketplace detail exterior treatments for these buildings. These standards exceed code minimums for multi-family and commercial buildings. County Road 15 and 110 right-of-way The developer is proposing to dedicate a 7 feet strip along Lynwood and Commerce to Hennepin County for right-of-way. This would appear to be acceptable to staff at this time until a 123 North Third Street, Suite I00, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 p. 3 #00-64, 65, 66, and 71- The Villages by Cook'~ Bay and Mound Markt~olace Preliminary Plag CUP, Reining, and Easement vacation November 20, 2000 determination from the County can be made. This often times comes after approval of the preliminary plat and is handled as a condition of final plat approval. Staff would like the developer to dedicate an pedestrian access easement between the right-of- way and building edge to further protect public access along Commerce and Lynwood. Parks and Trails The multi-use trail will be $ feet in width and easements will be provided to allow public use. A suggestion that was raised at the last meeting was to route the trail along the south side of the pond. The developer has indicated this is acceptable. Alley Vacation The plans show the alley on lots 18, 19 and 20 will be vacated. The preliminary plat indicates vacation of a portion of an alley to accommodate the access drive on Lynwood. All on and off- site utilities in the alley will need to be rebuilt consistent with the City Engineer's specifications. Parking A total of 313 parking spaces are shown in the commercial area at a 10 feet width. This equates to almost 1 space per 200 square feet of retail, a common standard among most metropolitan communities. The Mound code is set at 1 per 150 square feet which would require 440 spaces. Staff would concur with the developer's request. Staff would recommend isle spacing be a minimum of 62 feet. Two 90 degree parking areas are proposed in the residential area to accommodate staffs concerns regarding visitor parking. Staffwould suggest the that spaces adjacent to the rear of the grocery store be relocated around the clubhouse to better accommodate visitor parking. Pond arena parking lot is reconfigured and provides 40 parking spaces. Li~;hting Tl~e City code requires that commercial development lighting not exceed 0.4 foot candles at the property line. Building lighting is proposed as discussed in the Architecua'al Design Guidelines for Mound Marketplace. Lighting for the private pedestrian street system should be indicated. Combinations of street lights and building lighting could be used. Common Interest Community The XFtllages at Cook's Bay will be platted as a Common Interest Community (CIC). A CIC is permitted by State Statute and acts similar for platting purposes to a condominium. There will not be dedicated lot lines for the townhomes or Big Houses. Rather, a lot line will be created at interior wans for each unit. The building exteriors and land will be owned and maintained by an association. For platting purposes, the Preliminary Plat will receive approval from the Planning Commission and Council and final plat will receive Council approval. Upon final locations of the 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 p. 4 ~O0-&l, 55, ~, anti 71 - The Villages by Cook' ~ Bay and Mound Martoetpia~e Preliminary Pla~, CUP, Rezonin~, and Ea~ement vacation ~Vovember 20. 2000 units, the developer will certify each unit and file the CIC with the Hennepin County Recorder. For a point of reference on density, if this development were platted, each unit would have an average of 5,400 square feet of lot area. This exceeds that lot area that would be required for a townhome development platted under a straight R-3 zoning district. The townhome provisions in the R-3 district require 5,000 square feet of lot are a per unit for a 3 unit building and 4,000 square feet per unit for a 6 unit building. Comprehensive Plan Aa amendment to the land use plan for lots 18, 19, and 20 will need to be made to shown the land as Destination District. This can be handled :at the same time as the rezoning at the Planning Commission and at Final Plat approval by the City Council. RECOMM~N'DATIONS: Planning Report recommendations are provided below and are in addition to those outlined in the City Engineer's report. Preliminary Plat Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the Preliminary Plat with the following conditions: 1. Determination of fight-of-way by Hennepin County. Rezoning Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the rezonings as requested. The City will also approve a minor Land Use Plan revision to show lots 18, 19, and 20 of Lynwold Addition as Destination District Planned Unit Development consistent with the rezoning. The City w:ll also approve a textual revision to the Downtown Residential designation in the Land Use Plan to better descn'be the development density and character. Conditional Use Pemit Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Coun~ approval of the PDA for the V'fllages at Langdon Bay and the Mound Marketplace as requested with the following conditions: 1._, A variance of 127 parking spaces for the commercial parking area be approved. 2_. Relocate parking spaces along the rear of the grocery store to areas close to the clubhouse. 3~ A pedestrian easement between building facades along Lynwood and Commerce right-of- ways be provided. 4_, Easements for recreation and maintenance of the multi-use trail system. 5._, Indicate how the private streets will be lighted. 123 North Third Street, Suite I00, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 ,0.5 #00-64, 65, 66, and 71- The ~illage~ by Cook'$ Bay and Mound Marketplace Preliminary Plat, CUP, Rezoning, and Ea~ement vacation November 20, 2000 Developer work with the City in developing a streetscape along Commerce and Lynwood to address landscaping, faire, and other improvements complementary to the development and the Mound Visions Plan. Easement Vacation Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approve vacation of the alley easement as requested. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, l~mneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 Memorandum Hoisington Koegler ~roup Inc. TO: City of Mound Staff, Planning Commission and Council FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: November g, 2000 SUBJECT: Mound Visions 1N Addition Preliminary Plat - Mound Marketplace and The Village by Cook's Bay APpLIC.~NT: Meu'oPlains Development OWNER: Westonka Public School District LOCATION: NW comer ofLynwood Blvd and Commerce ZONING: Currently R-l, R-2 and B-1 proposed to change to R-3 PDA and Destination District PDA COMPREHENSIVE PLA_N: Downtown Residential, Destination District, and Low Density Residential BACKGROUND: The applicant, Metro Plains, has submitted a Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit and Zoning Amendment for a residential/commercial redevelopment project for the old Westonka High School property. The residential project, "The Village by Cook's Bay", will include 99 units in townhome and row house buildings. A 67,000 sq. ft. retail commercial component, "Mound Marketplace," is proposed for the Commerce/Lynwood comer. A purchase a~eement with the Westonka Public School District is pending. The Village by Cook's Bay The concur plan indicates 59 townhomes arranged in 3 - 7 unit buildings. All streets within the residential area of the development will be private with a 24 feet width. Staffhas requested there be no on-street parlfing because of the need to allow emergency access on this narrowed design. Staffhas also requested extra parking bump outs for overflow parldng which is always needed in townhome developments. The narrative indicates each tow~ome will have a 2 stall garage, although the garage width on the plans scale at 17 f~t and would not allow this arrangement. Either the plans are not to scale or the unit widths will need to be increased. If the unit width is increased, the layout and/or unit count will change as a result. As a planned development, dimensional items such as building setbacks, lot area and width are approved and regulated under a conditional use permit. At this point, individual lots are not 123 North Third Sueet, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 p. 2 800-64, 65, and 66 - The Pillages by Cook's Bay and Mound Marketplace Preliminary Plat, CUP, and R m, oning November 8, 2000 shown on the preliminary plat or the development plan to establish these standards. Articles of incorporation, association bylaws, or other covenants will need to be provided and approved by Council for this development. Typical building layouts showing exterior elevation design, are provided. Townhome developments have a tendency to be rather monotonous without attention to special details like rooflines, large wall sections, garage doors, transition between units, and materials. If these are the plans that will be used, the plansets should reflect this and also provide an elevation as viewed from the street to show garages. -The developer aaticipates the towahomes will attract empty nesters Md you.ag families aad is a good 'fit' with ca:rent housing market needs. Aa idea of what the interior layouts will incorporate to support the narrative ia the development packet should be provided. Four 'big house' flats are shown on the eastern side of the development along Bellaire Road. The narrative talks about these un/ts as single level with 4 units per level in these 2 - 3 story buildings. Under~ound parking would be provide& Dimensional standards would be regulated through the conditional use permit as well as building design items like exterior materials. Staff ag'tees with the developer that the market for the flats would appeal to sen/ors which is a good 'fit' with the needs in Mound. PARCEL SIZE 1227 ac PROPOSED UNIT # 99 DENSITY 8 uni~acr¢ ZONiNG (EXISTING) R-1 ZONING (PROPOSED) R-3 PDA Miuimum Lot Size Not available Minimum Lot Width Not available Front Yard Setback Not available Side Yard Setbacks Not available Rear Yard Setbacks Not available LAN-D USE PLAN Downtown Residential Residential @ 7 + SU'BDIV'ISION ST1LEET DESIGN Right-of-way width NA - private ~xee~ Pavement width 24 feet Park Site Dedication 1.89 acres or 10% of total development laud area - 18.97 acres HARDCOVER 36.2 percent 123 No~h Third Street, Suite 100, Minaeapolia, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax(612) 338-6838 p.$ ~00-64, 65, and 66- 77re Villages by Cook's Bay and Mound Marketplace Prdiminary Plat, CUP, and R~oning November 8, 2000 Mound Marketplace At the comer of Lynwood and Commerce on the old school site, the developer is proposing 67,000 sq. ft. of retail commercial arranged in three buildings. The developer indicates a grocer will be the main tenant to anchor this area and will be located in the building fronting on Lynwood. The building fronting on Commerce would be targeted for a restaurant. Ideas for the third building are a liquor store and other smaller tenants. The buildings fron~ng Lynwood and Commerce would have a close relationship with the street to compliment the Mound Vision Plan. Because this is a planned development Iike the residential component, dimensional standards and design are regulated through a conditional use permit. P.ad~CEL SIZE 6.7 ac PROPOSED SQ. FT. OF 67,000 CONLMERCIAL ZO*-ENG (EXISTLNG) B-l, R-l, R-2 ZO.~-LNG (PROPOSED) I Destination Dismct PDA M~nirrtum Lot Size Not available Minimum Lot Width Not available From Yard Setbacks- Building fronting on Lynwood 20 feet Building fronting on Commerce 2 feet Side Yard Setbacks- Building fronting on L.vnwood 97 feet West building 30 feet Rear Yard Setbacks Not available L.~X~-D USE PLAN Destination District SL'BDI'WISION STREET DESIGN Streets/Drives All private access 357 spaces provided Code requires z~6 spaces 9 feet by 18 feet stall dimension Code requires l0 feet by 20 feet HA.R.D COVER 92 percent Details for landscaping are not provided. Code requires minimums of 1 tree per residential dwelling unit and the greater of 1 tree per 1,000 square feet of floor area or 50 feet of perimeter for commercial development. There are vitually no trees on the property today. 1Z3 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Mixmesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 p. 4 g00-64. 65, and 66 - The l/illages by Cook's Bay and Mound Marketplace Preliminary Plat, CUP, and R~oning November 8, 2000 Screening and Buff'erin~ Parking areas and loading docks will need screening fi:om residential areas through landscaping, berming, or fencing techniques. Building Material Standards Acceptable building materials as outlined in the code will apply to residential and commercial structures. The site was historically a wetland but was filled prior to and after consm~ction of the 1916 school and 1960 addition. No wetlands ex/st on the property today and a review of development implications on the Wetland Conservation Act is not applicable. Gradino_/Storm Waer As addressed in City Engineer report County_ Road 15 and 110 As discussed in the City Engineer report, is appears that Hennepin County will require additional right-of-way that will reduce the platted land area. This will impact the proposed building locations and parking area. The County is holding off on specific comments until a review of the traffic study for the downtown is complete. The report is anticipated to be complete in early December. The plan indicated the dedication of 1.89 acres of land to park to satisfy 10 percent land dedication. The report is inaccurate in describing the City's role in park development. The City has asked the developer to provide play equipment in the tot lot located in the northwest corner of the site. Additional improvements desired in the park area along Bellaire would be provided by the developer, not the City at this time. The City would expect the park area be graded and turf established at the time the residential component is being built. Parking bays along Bellalre and Elm would be built by the developer not the City. The indicated 6 feet trail should be $ feet as requested by Staff. Additional easements to provide public access will need to be provided. Discussion about using the stonnwater pond as a skating area during the winter surfaced at staff discussions and the Park Commission. The developer would like to incorporate this as a 'public' amenity,. Some type of easement of use agreement will need to be put in place to secure this for community residents. Arrangements for snow removal, lighting; and other use related issues will need to be worked out also. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 £. 5 gOO-M, 65, and 66- 7'he Villages by Cook's Bay and Mound Marketplace th'elimina~. Plat, CUP, and Rezoning November 8, 2000 An outrun area will need to be graded properly for a sliding hill. The retainiug wall in the tot lot should be on private property if it Can't be avoided. Alfey Vacation The preliminary plat indicated vacation of a portion of an alley to accommodate the access drive on Lynwood. A description of the alley needs to be provided along with an application to vacate. A public hearing will also need to be scheduled. As indicated on the survey, the property:boundary extends into what would appear to be the parking are for Pond's arena. Knowing the parking deficiencies of the arena during hockey games, the developer has indicated that are shown as Outlot A will be ~ven to the arena. Antenna tower The developer has discussed the status oi~ the cell tower with the leasing company US West, now known as Qwest. The developer has indicated the tower will not work with the current site layout and will need to be relocated on or off site. The City approved a variance for the tower for it location on current parcel 11 and it will only allow relocation within the boundar/es of that parcel. Because towers are only permitted on industrial lands, there not the oppormn/ty for relocation to the commercial site. Also, if the tower is moved, it needs to have a fall zone equal to its hei~ht fi-om the property lines of what is now parcel 11. Comprehensive Plan An amendment to the land use plan for lots 18, 19, and 20 will need to be made to shown the land as Destination District. This can be handled at the same time as the rezoning at the Planning Commission and at Final Plat approval by the City Council. Other comments · · · Complete survey information for the site and adjacent lands 100 feet fi-om property. Comply with Hennepin County requirements for showing off site streets and driveways. Need to determine how townhomes and flats will be subdivided on the plat. Narrative discusses speed bumps along Bellaire and Alder. Appear to be incorrect statement. City will not allow bumps on public streets. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission consider review of the Preliminary Plat and development plan applications, but take no action until additional information can be provided to meet code requirements as discussed in this report and the City Engineer's report. 123 North Third Slxeet, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 M'EMORAND UM DATE: ".Novembe¢ 9, 2000 TO: Jori Sutherland, Planning and Zoning FROM: John Cameron, City Engineer City of Mound Metro Plains Mound.Visions 1st Addition Preliminary Plat Case No. 00-64, 00-65, and 00-66 IvfFtLA. #12252 As requested, we have reviewed the materials submitted by Metro Plains for a major subdivision of the School District property, at the comer of Commerce Boulevard and Lynwood Boulevard and have the following comments and recommendations: Preliminary Plat The name suggested for the plat is "Mound Vision 1st Addition," with Vision singular. The plat for the new True Value Hardware site was called "Mound Visions Addition" with Vision plural. This plat should also use Visions. Hennepin County will most likely require this plat to be the 2nd Addition; however they do not have a requirement that the addition number be numerical, it can be spelled out. The City should decide with this plat how they would like to see the addition number identified and continue the procedure on all future plats for the downtown redevelopment. The documentation submitted suggests that at least some of these units will be platted as townhomes, which require separate platted lots. The preliminary plat as submitted shows only one large lot for the entire residential area. If the intention is to plat individual lots, the plat will need to be revised to show such. Jori Suthefland, Planning and Zoning November 9, 2000 Page 2 The preliminary plat does not show any additional fight-of-way to be dedicated to Hermepin County along both Commerce Boulevard (CSAH #110) and Lynwood Boulevard (CSAH #15). Hennepin County had indicated they will definitely require additional fight-of-way on Lynwood Boulevard and possibly along Commerce Boulevard. The City is currently working with Hennepin County on a redesign of the intersection, which will undoubtedly affect this property. The City Code, Section 330, requires that all existing conditions within 100 feet must be shown. This has not been done; therefore it is very difficult for Heunepin County or Mound staffto review the submit'hal for the affects on adjacent property. The prelimin~ plat shows the east end of the existing alley to be vacated. This will require additional action by the City Council and Planning Commission and requires public heatings. The City has utilities located within this alley, for which easements will need to be retained. There is also an existing City of Mirmetrista sanitary sewer forcemain and a City of Mound storm sewer line, which traverse the site between Alder Road and the alley, for which easements will be required. Preliminary' Grading and Utility Plan 1. The preliminary grading and utility plan generally met the City's requirements. The streets within the development are proposed to be private. The grading plan indicates two different methods of collecting stormwater. The main north/south street that connects to the commercial area shows street drainage with catch basins on only one side. The looped street along the north and west side has an inverted crown with catch basins located in the center of the street. These designs will function adequately; however they do not meet Mound's normal City street design where the street is crowned with catch basins located on both sides at the curb line. Since the City does not have an approved Stormwater Management Plan, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 0vlCWD) is still the permitting agency for the stormwater permit. Application must bl made directly to the MCWD and any approval by the City of the preliminary plat must be conditional upon MCWD's ultimate approval. MCWD policy requires that the applicant receive preliminary appro:val fi-om the City before they will take action on the request. We have reviewed the proposed watermaln system with the Public Works Superintendent and are in general agreement with the proposed plan; however before final plans can be prepared the applicant must provide a fn'eflow analysis for our review. It appears there may be a shortage of hydrants, especially in the residential area. The hydrant spacing should be reviewed by the Mound Fire Department. The plan does not show any valves on the proposed watermain. Locations for valves will need to be discussed with Public Works and the City Engineer and added when final plans are prepared. Mound requires valves on all hydrant leads. Jori Sutherland, Planning and Zoning November 9, 2000 Page 3 The sanitary sewer system as presented also appears to be in general compliance with City requirements. Utility easements must be provided on the final plat for both the watermain and sanitary sewer, which will be public utilities. The sanitary sewer maine providing service for the two individual commercial buildings should remain as private lines. The entire storm sewer system, including the stormwater pond will be priv.ate, to be maintained by the Homeowner's Association and Commercial entity. The only exception will be the existing catch basins located at the southwest side of the intersection of Bellaire and Alder. These catch basins should remain on the City's present system ,7.. The..most.¢asit. er!y.sanitary.Se..wer manhole in the alley is located in the portion of the alley proposed for vacation. It is also very close to a proposed retaining wall and therefore we are recommending that a new manhole be built over the existing main approximately 20 feet. The unused section main and old manhole would need to be removed as part of this construction. Streets and Access The narrative accompanying the application calls for private streets 24 feet wide with no parking on either side. The plan does not specifically identify concrete curb and gutter; however this is a standard requirement of the City whether the streets are private or public. The off street parking areas shown on the "Development Plan" do not match those shown on the "Preliminary. Grading and Utility Plan." It appears the Grading Plan may be more correct, since it shows more off street parking, which will be required with no on street parkSng allowed. The Development Plan needs to be revised to reflect the correct layout. 3. Any approval of the pre!~minary plans must be conditional upon Hennepin County's approval of the three entrances shown on the Grading Plan and Development Plan. The Grading Plan indicates new off street parking on the west side of Bellaire Lane between Alder Road and the new private street entering the site at the northeast comer of the property. The Development Plan also shows off-street parking on the south side of Elm Road. All costs associated with widening of the City streets to provide additional parking should be the responsibility of the developer. The parki_ 'rig malls for the Commercial area are not dimensioned; however they scale approximately 9 feet wide by 20 feet deep, which does not meet the City's required width of 10 feet (Section 350:760, subd. 2.A). The dimension of 60 feet as shown between the parking bays is at low end of the accepted standards for this distance. Our recommendation would be to look at these two distances together. If the stalls are change to ten foot wide, as required by code, then the 60 feet is acceptable; however ffnine-foot wide stalls are used (which will require a variance) then a minimum of 62 feet or 63 feet should be required between the parking bays. Jon Su~erlan~ Planning and Zoning Nov~nber 9, 2000 Page 4 The proposed bitumino~ trail is not dimensioned on any of the plsns; however the narrative states it will be six feet wide. We would recommend that eight feet wide be the minimum allowed, which is a reco.?ized standard in most communities. 7. Speed bumps at Bellaire and Alder are mentioned in the narrative. The City does not allow speed bumps on public streets. Miscellaneous The records at City Hall have been researched to try and determine what this property has previously paid for utility and street assessments. It appears that sufficient fees have been paid for past sanitary sewer and street improvement projects; however nothing could be found relating to previous assessments for watermain. ' 2. The different plan sheets should be revised to include City requirements and also to be consistent with each other. cc: Loren Gordon, Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. s:\main:klvlou 12252:\Correspond~ace~utherland I 1-7 REDEVELOPMENT OF FORMER WESTONKA SCHOOL SITE Mound Visions - First Addition Mound Marketplace and The Village by Cook's Bay BY: MetroPlains Development LLC October 27, 2000 rli MAJOR SUBDIVISION City of Mound 5341 May~xxI Road; Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 47Z-0600, Fax: 472-0620 OCT o ooo -.tANNING COMM. DATE November Z3, 2000 CASE ~O. ~/ ~?~l- Ct~ OF MOUN CI~ COUNCIL DATE: Dec~be~ [2 ~ 2000 / ~ ~ PRELIMINARY CI~ ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS { FINAL P~T DNR ~ $1~OT OVER 2 ~OTS FIRE DEPAR~ENT [ ~ ~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: PDA I I ASSESSING ~, ~ ESCROW DEPOSIT $1,~ OT~ER; l~ ,i -%.~ / ~ ~.~ ,. ~ t VARIANCE. ..... TOT~ S1450 Please type or print the followino infom~ation: PROPERTY INFORMATION EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION ZONING DISTRICT Subi~'t Address 5600 Lynwood Blvd. (reference point for property) Name of Pr°'Mound~ Visions First Aridity'on Plat - Lot Please see attached Block Prat# Subdivisicn PID~ Circle: R-1 R-CA R-2 R-3 B-1 ' B-2 B-3 APPLICANT The applicant is: X owner other: Name MetroPlains Development LLC Ad~ress 1600 University Ave. Suite 212 - St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone (H) n/a ON) 651-646-7848 0u) , Name OWNER (if other than Address applicant) Phone (H) (W~ (M) SURVEYOR/ ENGINEER Name Survey-Schoell & Madson EnKineer-Sunde EneineerinK, Inc. Addr~s Survey- 10580 Wayzata Blvd. Suite- 1 Mi~netonka 55305 Engineer - 4200 West 01d Shakopee Rd. Suite 230 Phone (Revised Major Subdiwsion Application Bloomington 554 ;7 5 7. Page 2 Description of Proposed Use: into a combinat£on of The former' Westonka $choo site will he redeveloped residenital~ commercial and dedicated parks. ' EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: U~ impacts the proposed use will have on proper~ in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. please see attached for full eXPlanation of effects If applicable, a development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project $ RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS: Number of Structures: 15 Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: 35 ~ 660 sq. ft. Number of Dwelling Units/Structure: 4-10 Total Lot Area: 534 ~ 900 sci. ft. Has an application ever been m-ado for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, a~on taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. zoning amendments, conditional use permit and PDA application are being submitted together on October 27,2000 This applica~fon must be signed by ali owners of the subject property, or an explanation given why this is not the case. Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date (Revised "10.27.99) CONDtTIONAL USE PERMIT City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 472-)607, Fax: 472-0620 Planning Commission Date: November 13, 2000 C~ Council Date: December 12, 2000 Use OCT 3 0 ZOO0 C[1'Y OF MOUND DistTibutJon: ' City Planner: / ~' ~. ~- Public Works: Fire Dept. / Please type or print the followinq information: PROPERTY Subject INFORMATION Address 5600 Lynwood Blvd. (reference ooint for property) ' Name of Business LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot Please see Attached Block Plat# Subdivision P1D~ APPLICANT The aDplicant is: X own~ other, Name Metro?lains Develo.maent LLC Address 1600 University Ave. Suite 212 St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone (H). n/a .ON) 651-6&6-7848 (M) Name OWNER (If other than Address applicant) Phone (~) (VV) (M). Name Paul Madson of Paul Madson + Associates ARCHrrECT, SURVEYOR. OR ' AEdress Ford Centre-420 N. Fifth Street-Minneapolis, MN 55401 ENC~NEER Phone '.; d om attache¢ (H) (W), 612-332-7026 .(M) ZONING Circle:C*~ R-1A{~)R-3~B-2 B-3 DISTRICT CHANGE OF FROM: 1) B1 & R2 and 2) R1 USE 1) Destination District and 2) P.3-PDA TO: *conl Revised 10.26-99 '1 Description of Proposed Use: into a combination of The former Westonka School Site will be redevelooed residential, commercial and dedicated parks. EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. Please see attached for full explanation of effects If applicable, a development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project:. $ Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this proper~y? ( ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolu'fions. zoning amendments, conditional use perm/ts and PDA applications are being submitted together on October 27,2000 This application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or an explanab'on given why this is not ~he case. METROPLNNS DEVELOPMENT, LLC Eli3// BY: LAVERNE HANSON, JR., SENIOR VICE PRES1D~ . [O.7.../.eX.3 Print Applicant's Name Applic~a~-"b~gnature Date Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date Re~ ~2~99 ZONING AMENDMENT APPLICATION City of Mound, 5341 Mayw~°d Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 472-(]607, Fax: 472-0620 'arming Commission Date: November 13, 2000 Council Date: December 12, 2000 Distribution: , ~'/~-/.' '~-' City Planner ../ City Engineer / Public Works / DNR AJD OCT 3 0 2000 CaseNo. /2'~',)C~¢MOUND Zoning Amendment Fee: ~ ,~ Applicant Name MetroPlains Development, LLC Address 1600 University Ave. Suite Phone (H) (V~ b51-646-/~4~ (M) ! AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE It is requeSted that Section 350: of the Mound Zoning Ordinance be amended as follows: Reason for amendment: I XX I AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP I ZONING DISTRICT It is requested that the prope,%, described below and sho.w..n, on the attached site plan be rezoned from BI,Ri & R2 to Destination DJ.strict and ~3-Pua Address & Legal of Subject Property Address 5600 LT=wood Blvd. Lot please see a~:ached Addition (reference point for property) Block PIE~ Plat Owner of Subject Site Name HetroP~a~n~ D~vel0=ment LLC Address ~600 Universit7 Ave. Suite 212 St. Paul. M~ Phone (H) n/a ON),,, 651-646-7848 (M) 55104 Present Use of Property Reason for Property is being submitted for a Planned Development Area Amendment w-ill be developed into residential, commercial and paris. , ;- :lica~'s Signature:~ Date !0'~7'~O (?DA). Proper~cy Owner's Signature: Date EFFECTS OF PROPOSED USE The proposed development will impact the vicinity in areas such as traffic, noise, parking, etc. FoLlowing are the steps to be taken to mitigate the impact: .ARRANGEMENT · The commercial area is po..~itioned on the existing intersection of Lynwood and Commerce Blvds. This is being done to minimize the effects of traffic, people, noise, etc. on the sun'ounding neighborhood. o There will be two loading docks for the commercial development. Both docks are located close to the commercial entrance off Lynwood Blvd. They will be screened from the neighborhood by both landscaping and screening walls. The docks are located in these areas to minimize truck tra~c through the neighborhood and development The proposed residential is centered in the redefined residential property. It is bounded by Bellaire Lane on the east, a public alley along the south, residential along the west and Elm Road along the north. The residential area is being positioned 'inward' so as to provide open green space between itself and the existing neighborhood. The scale of the housing is situated in footprint and height so as to integrate with neighborhood scale. Two access points are available for the residents. Both are positioned to provide minimum impact on the existing neighborhood. Parks are arranged along the north edge of the residential property on Elm Road and along the east edge of the residential property along Bellalre Lane. The parks are placed in these locations to offer a direct connection to the existing neighborhood and the greater community for ease of access. The parks offer access to the whole community by being located along the perimeter so as to not feel internal to the new development. The parks also allow the new residential area to integrate into the existing, neighborhood. LOCATION .~ND WIDTH OF STREETS · All existing public streets will remain and will not be improved by the developer. · All streets internal to the property will be private. · Private streets are 24' edge-to edge or back-to-back. A standard city street in the community of Mound has a 28' back-to-back with parking one side. Thereby, a 24' with no parking gives equal or greater accessibility for emergency, fire and general use. · Private streets will connect to BeLlaire Lane and Lynwood Blvd. DKAEqAGE · All drainage for both the commercial and residential portions of the site wil-I be contained within the site property boundaries. This will be accomplished will the construction of a storm water pond along the south edge of the site. · The pond is to be approximately 34,000 sq.ft · Required dead-storage (standing water below the pond outlet elevation) volume for this development is 2.6 acres/ft. The proposed pond size meets these requirements PRELI1HINARY PLAT APPLICATION REDEVELOPMENT OF FORMER WESTONKA SCHOOL SITE BY: MetroPlains Development, LLC October 27, 2000 NAME OF SUBDMSION Re-Plat Name: Mound Vision - First Addition Commercial: Mound Marketplace Residential: The Village by Cook's Bay LEGAL DESCRIPTION Please see attached EXI:tT~IT A NAME OF OWNER MetroPlalns Development, LLC 1600 University. Ave - Suite 212 St. Paul, MN 55104 651-646-7848 Please see attached EXttIBIT B for other pertinent team members GENERAL NAK1L~TIVE MetroPlains Development, LLC over the past 12 months has generated a concept for the former Westonka School site that consists of three primary components; commercial, residential and park. To achieve this concept MetroPlains has brought together a skilled team of companies and individuals to address the issues in the most proficient way. The goal is to not only provide a high quality development on the former school site but to also enhance the Mound Visions plan for the downtown and community as a whole. To that end, the concept presented here is a culmination of meetings, revisions and ideas as shared through city staff, department heads, city consultants, Sketch Plan Review, Parks & Open space, Hennepin County Department of Transportation, Ponds Arena and the MetroPlain~q team. The three components of the concept include commercial (Mound Marketplace), residential (The Village by Cook's Bay) and the park (Central Park). Mound Marketplace on the corner of Commerce and Lynwood, is an urban commercial scheme addressing the street as a central business district building would and anchors the opposite comer of the downtown Visions plan for the CBD of Mound. The Village by Cook's Bay is a residential development of urban scale using for sale townhomes, row house and a big house to meet the needs of the marketplace. The housing addresses the needs for quality housing at a reasonable price that allows seniors to young professionals to find a lifestyle that compliments the single-family home ownership of the existing community. The park is the binder that ties the existing community/neighborhood, the commercial and the residential to come together as a mutually beneficial and complimentary neighborhood. EXISTING CON2)ITIONS BOUNDARY LINES - EXItIBIT C · The legal description and the boundary lines as d~ignated on the survey define the site boundary lines. EXISTING ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS - EX/dJ]SIT D · Commercial section zoned as B 1 (bounded by Lynwood Blvd., Commerce Blvd, alley off of Bellaire Lane and Adler Lane.) · Single family lots along Lynwood Blvd. (18-20) are zoned as R2 Remaining site is zoned as R1 · Abutting property zoning classifications range from R2- R3 TOTAL ACREAGE · 18.97 acres or 826,400 sq.ft. EXISTING PLATTED STREETS - EX}ti'BIT C · Commerce Blvd- east edge of site o There are two existing curb cuts located along Commerce. The cut to the south of the Ponds Arena will remain. An additional cut will be relocated further south for a 'right-in, right out' into the new commercial area. · Lynwood Blvd. - south edge of site o Lynwood Blvd. fight-of-way will be expanded to accommodate turning, parking and increased driving lanes as requested by Heunepin County. Final design is not yet defined. We are continuing to work with them through completion. At least a 6' condemnation of the property is expected. o There are two curb cuts located along Lynwood. One cut will be eliminated. The other will be relocated for access into the residential/commercial area. · Elm Road - North edge of site - no proposed change · Bellaire Lane- - intersects site offElm Road o Parking access off the intersection of Adler and Bellaire will include speed bumps to slow traffic. · Adler Road - runs north of Ponds Arena - no proposed change · Public alleyway servicing homes off of Lynwood Blvd. - no proposed change BLOCK ARRANGEMENT OF ORIGINAL PLAT · Please see EXBIBITS A (legal description) and C (survey) EXISTING UTILITIES - EXtIXBIT E Water Mains · 6" water main network surrounds the site · 10" water main off Commerce Blvd. Sanitary Sewer Lines · Elm Road · 8" line off of Lynwood Blvd. · 12" line off of Commerce Blvd. Pipelines · A 12" joint storm & sewer force main runs through the site. The ~ rtm~ clown Adler, south through the site to the public alley for the houses located on Lynwood Blvd. High Voltage Lines · No high voltage lines run through thc site Cellular Tower · The cellular tower is presently located in the center of the proposed residential development. · The tower has a 25-year lease, which cannot be termln~ed by the landowner. · The tower can be relocated either somewhere else on the site or withi~ the Cit7 of Mound. · Meetings with US West Cellular will continue to define the relocation of the tower. · Please see EXHIBIT E for grade, invert elevation and hydrant data and locations. BOUNDARY LINES OF ADJOINING, UNSUBDIVIDED LAND · Not applicable - all adjoining land is divided SUBDIVISION DESIGN FEATURES LAYOUT OF PROPOSED STREETS - EXltlRIT F · All existing public streets will remain. No changes to these streets are proposed with the exception of the expansion of Lynwood Blvd. · The remaining street infrastructure is included in the PDA and will be private. The streets will be constructed and maintained by the owner. · Private streets are 24' edge-to edge or back-to-back. A standard city street in the community of Mound has a 28' back-to-back with parking one side. Thereby, a 24' with no parking gives equal or greater accessibility for emergency, fire and general use. LOCATION AND WIDTHS OF ALLEYS/SIDEWALKS - EXHIBIT F · Sidewalks will be 5' for the residential mains. Walks from units will be 4' wide. · Trailway system will be 6' bituminous with improvements. A right of way easement for maintenance will be executed with the City of Mound. PROPOSED UTILITY LOCATIONS/SIZES - EXlql~rr E Water. · The water service for the proposed development will be looped through the site and connected to the 10" water main in Commerce Blvd. An additional connection will be made to the mailer 6" ma/n in Bellaire Lane. The size of the on-site water supply lines will be generally 8" diameter and will provide both fire protection and domestic water service. Sewer: · The proposed sanitary sewer will be a gravity line extending from the residential portion on the west through the commercial area on the east line connecting to the existing 12" sewer main in Commerce Blvd. An 8" diameter PVC sanitary sewer will provide the required sanitary sewer capacity. Gas/Electric: · Gas and electric service will be designed and provided by NSP and Minnegasco for both the commercial and residential areas. Gas lines are presently available to the site from Commerce Blvd. DRAl2qAGE PLAN - EXttlBIT E · Due to the natural grade of the property as explained above, a storm water pond will'be constructed in the far SW comer of the property. · The pond will be dead-storage (standing water below the pond outlet elevation) Based on the percentage of proposed impervious site coverage; the required dead storage volume for this development is 2.6 acres/foot · The proposed storm water pond of 34,000 sq.ft accommodates this volume. · Pond will include a 10' aquatic bench at the normal water level. · The pond will discharge to the existing 30" diameter storm sewer on the west side of Parcel B. · The proposed development will enhance storm water management throughout the site by providing new ponding and pre-treatment facilities. The previous drainage of the site was an uncontrolled sheet drainage system. · A review in underway to detexmine features, such as perimeter plantings, aeration, water table and recreational use of the pond. PRELIMINARY DIMENSIONS OF LOTS AND BLOCK- EXttIBIT F · The property will be platted as one lot. · The property will be designated as a planned development area. Each component is separately planned and each will have its own set of standards and phase completion. · The lot is 18.97 acres or 826,400 SCl.ft. AREAS DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC USE - EXtilBIT F · 10% of proposed property will be dedicated to the City of Mound for park dedication fees. This is approximately 1.89 acres. · Central Park is a continuous park along Bellaire Lane and Elm Road. · The Bellaire Lane park is 590' x 100' or 59,000 sq. ft. It extends from Elm Road to the south edge of the Ponds Arena. · The park on Elm Road sits in the far NW comer of the' site. It is approximateIy 32,700 sq.ft, in a trapezoid shape. · There is a parkway connection linking the two parks. A portion of the deveIopment trailway system ms through the parkway connection. The connection is approximately 26' x 40' or 10,400 sq.ft. · The parks will extend over a new street accessing the residential development. A permanent easement to the residential development will need to be executed between the city and the owner. AREAS INTENED FOR USE OTHER THAN RESDIENTIAL/PL~LIC - EXttIBIT F · 6.7 acres of the site will be used for commercial development. The commercial development will be located in the area of the property presently zoned as B 1 located in the SE comer of the site at Lynwood Blvd. and Commerce Blvd. · Site will be re-zoned in the PDAYCUP as 'Destination District'. · The comer plaza off Lynwood and Commerce will be a major design feature to encourage and accommodate pedestrian activity. SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONING DISTRICT- EXHIBIT F · The proposed development will be re-zoned as a PDA. · Setbacks will be as follows: o Commercial- no setback o Residential - front yards adjacent to development. Zero lot line definition association will be developed. parks or property lines 20' within for the condominium or townhome SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION TOPOGRAPHIC MAP · See Exhibit C SOIL REPORTS · Soil testing was completed by STS consultants. Soils on the site range from medium to poor. · Extensive soil corrections will be necessary to prepare the site for the construction of the residential and commercial portions of the site. · See enclosed EXttIBIT G WATER SUPPLY/SEWAGE DISPOSAL/FINSIHED GRADES/DRAINAGE · See attached EXI:I~ E for all information. PROPERTY REGISTERED OR ABSTRACT · The entire parcel is an abstract property. · A copy of the abstract is attached. EXHIBIT A PARKING - EXI:IIBIT F Commercial · 363 parking stalls will be available for commercial parking. · This number exceeds the necessary amount for a commercial development of this size, which would be 335 spaces. Ponds · Arena The developer is committed to expanding the parking for Ponds Arena. The present plan intends to expand parking from 20 to 42 spaces. Residential · Towhome/Rowhouse - A 2-car attached garage will be part of the design of each nnlt. The driveway will accommodate an additional 2 cars. This gives each townhome unit 4 spaces each. · Big House - Underground parking will be located beneath each big house. A total of 80 spaces will be constructed, providing a 2:1 ratio. · Guest Parking - Several guest parking spaces are located throughout the residential site to accommodate resident guests. Parks Parking may be available on street at both Elm Road and Bellaire Lane. Improvement to the street to accommodate this parking will need to be undertaken by the City of Mound. Legal Description Former Westonka School Site Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, g, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17, Lynwold Park, Lake Minnetonka, together w~th vacated Ridgewood Avenue and vacated alley originally delineated and dedicated in said plat of Lynwold Park, Lake Minnetonka. Lot 18, Lynwold Park, Lake Minnetonka, except the North 30 feet thereof. Lots 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101,104, 105, 106, 107, 10g, 109, I10, llI, I12, 113, 114 and 115, Mound. Those pans of Lots 102 and 103, "Mound", which lie Easterly of the East line of the West 200.00 feet of the Northeast lA of the Southeast lA of Section 14, Township 117 North, Range 24 West of the 5t~ Principal Meridian, Hermepin County, Minnesota. That part of Meadow Lane, as delineated and dedicated on the plat of "Mound", and now vacated,, which lies Easterly of the West 200.00 feet of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast IA of Section 15, Township ll7 North, Range 24 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, Hennepin County., Minnesota, and Westerly of the Southerly extension of the West line of Dewey Avenue, now known as Bellaire Lane, as delineated and dedicated in said plat of "Mound". The South ½ of the northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of Section 14, Township 117 North, Range 24 West of the 5t Principal Meridian, Hermepin County, Minnesota, except the West 200.00 feet thereof, also except that pan within the plat of "Mound", and except that pan described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast comer of said South ~ of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼; thence Southerly along the East line of said Southeast ¼, a distance of 225.00 feet; Westerly parallel with the North line of said South ½ of the No~.~ ¼ of the Southeast ¼, to the intersection with the southerly extension of the West line of Dewey Avenue, now known as Bellaire Lane, as delineated and dedicated in the plat of"Mound"; thence Northerly along said Southerly extension to the North line of said South ½ of the Northeast lA of the Southeast ¼,. thence Easterly along said North line to the point of beginning. And except that pan of said South ½ of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼, distant 225.00 feet Southerly from the Northeast comer of said South a,/,_ of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼; thence Westerly, parallel with the North line of said South ½ of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼, a distance of 398.63 feet; thence Southerly, deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, a distance of 158.39 feet; thence Easterly, deflecting to the left $9 degrees 57 minutes 22 seconds, to said East line of the Northeast ¼ of the Southeast ¼; thence Northerly along said East line to the point of beginning. Legal Description: Lots 19 and 20 Lynwold Park Lake Minnetonka MetroPlains Development - Overall Project Developer/Owner 1600 University Ave. Suite 212 St. Paul, MN 55104 FAX: 651-646-8947 Larry Olson Larissa Tadavarthy Veto Hanson Michelle Kaiser 651-523o1246 651-523-1236 651-523-1245 651-523-1238 lolson(~rnetroplains.com Itadava~h¥(~etroplains.com Ihanson~metroplains.com mkaiser(~metroplains.com PBK Investments - Sub Developer/Owner for Commercial property 4969 Olson Memorial Highway Golden Valley MN 55422 7.~53 545-1697 ~;~.~, 'Bnan PeHoWs~ (763) 545-1672 pbki~vest~.aol.com Paul Madson + Associates - Project ~ Planner/Architect Residential Ford Centre 420 N Fifth St Minneapolis MN 55401 FAX: (612) 332-5604 Paul Madson (612) 332-7026 pmadson~visi.com KKE Architects, Inc. - Commercial Architect/Planner 300 First Avenue North Mineapolis, MN 55401 FAX: (612) 333-7596 Kathy Anderson (612) 339-4200 klande(~kke.com Sunde Engineering, Inc. - Civil En~neering/Overall Project 4200 West Old Shakopee Road- Suite 230 Bloomington, MN 55437 FAX: (952) 881-1913 Brian Mundstock (952) 881-3344 bmundstock~sundeciviI.com Schoell & Ma&on, Inc. - Site Surveyor 10580 Wayzata Blvd- Suite 1 Minnetonka, MN 55305 FAX: 952-546-9065 Dave Tirmes Rick Williams (952) 546-7601 (952) 847-9615 Mixed Use Development, Mound STS Project 97658 3.0 EXPLORATION RESISTS 3.1 Site and Geology Approximately the southerly two-thirds to thl~~ of Parcel A was formerly occupied by the Westonka School and Community Center, which has recently been demolished. The foundations of that building reportedly still remain in place. The floor elevation of the demolished building was about 953 feet NGVD. The area directly to the north of the former building, leading to the adjacent Ponds Ice Arena, was bituminous paved. The larger parcel, Parcel B, was the former school playground, and contained a baseball diamond, hockey rink, play area, and football field with rtmnlng track. Most of this area is fairly level, with ground elevations of 947 to 949.5 feet There are earth berms or slopes to the west of the football field/nmning track, and to the northwest of the baseball diamond. A set of concrete bleachers is built into the slope west. of the football field. There are also a number of chain link fences on this portion of the property. This site lies at the north margin of Lake Minnetonlm It is among Cooks Bay of Lake Minnetonka, Langdon Lake, Dutch Lake, and Hanison Bay of Lake Minnetonka. According to information published by the Minnesota Geological Survey, thl.q site overlies a deeply incised valley in the bedrock. The uppermost bedrock in this area is believed to consist of St. Lawrence dolomific sfltstone and shale and/or Franconia sandstone of upper Cambrian age, probably occurring at depths of 275 to 325 feet below I/¢'ound surface. The primary, naturally occuning sudicial soil consists of lean, clayey glacial tin deposited by the Des Moines ice lobe of the Wisconsinan glaciation. The upper portion of the clay fill was subsequently water modified, and now contains random seams or lenses of sand and st~t, some of which are water-bearing. In post- glacial times, some surficial organic soils formed on portions of the site under present study, due to the poor surface clra/nage and the tendency for water to pond in some areas. Some fill was placed over this site when the school building was developed. -6- Mi~ed Use Development, Mound STS Project 97658 3.2 Soil Conditions We found about 2-1/2 to 5-1/2 feet of mixed fill in our borings. The fill was very variable in composition and density, and included fine sandy silt, silty fine sand, and sandy clay, along with some organic topsoil. We consider the fill to be unreliable for foundation support. Below the 61! in three of our five borings, namely borings 2, 4 and 5, we penetrated a 2-1/2 to 9 foot thick stratum of peat, organic silt and organic silty clay. These soils were generally soft to very soft, and are potentially compressible. They are nn~dtable for foundation support. The major soil type at this site commenced at depths of 2.5 to 11 feet below ground surface, and extended to the termination depths of the borings. The deepest boring extended to 70 foot depth. This soil consisted of lean sandy and silty clay with a trace to a little fine sub-rounded gravel. The uppermost 2 to 7 feet of this formation tended to be sof~ to firm, but the major lower portion was stiff to very stiff in consistency. Standard penetration N-values in the clay till ranged from 3 to 4 in the upper part of the formation, to 7 to 31 at depth. We penetrated a number of sand se~m-~ within the clay till profile. These were on the order of a few inches to 2 feet thicl~. Many of these sand seams were.water-bearing, but the sand was generally medium dense. The stiff to very stiff sandy clay glacial till has moderate load bearing capacity and Iow compressibility, and is competent for foundation support. 3-3 Groundwater Conditions We observed free groundwater in all five borings while drilling. In boring 3, the observed groundwater level was at 21 feet initially. We then used a drilling mud slurry to advance the hole to depth, which obscured the later g~undwater readings. Thus we did not determine the hydrostatic groundwater level in boring 3. In the other four borings, we observed groundwater at -7- Mixed Use Development, Mound STS Project 97658 depths of 8 to 13.5 feet below ground surfaca,-eon~.s'ponding to elevations 933.3 to 939.7 feet NGVD. Dutch Lake is about 1800 feet northwest of this property, and has an average snmmer water elevation of 937 feet. Langdon Lake is 900 feet south by southwest, and has an average summer water elevation of 934 feet Cooks Bay and Harrison Bay of Lake lv~mnetonka are also within a 1/2 mile radius of this rite, and have an average summer water elevation of about 930 to 931 feet. Our interpretation of these data is that there is a groundwater table gradient across this site, from Dutch Lake down toward Lake Minnetonka to the east and southeast. The groundw~t._er levels at this site will fluctuate seasonally and annually, depending pfimaxfly on precipitation and climatic conditions. However the water level in Lake Minnetor~ka is closely controlled by the Gray's Bay Dam, and the various lakes and wetlands surrounding the site provide large storage areas for surface water. Thus we would not anticipate large fluctuations of the groundwater level, either upward or downward. For purposes of design at this site, we recommend that a groundwater elevation of 938.5 feet should be used at the northwest comer of Parcel B, grading to a groundwater elevation of 935 feet at the southeast comer of Parcel A. -8- Mixed Use Development, Mound STS Project 97658 4.0 ANALYSIS AND RECO~ATIONS 4.1 Discussion On a sitg~ficant portion of the site explored, encompassing borings 1, 3, 4 and 5, the poor quality fill and soft compressqble soils am less than 11 feet thick. In these areas, some soil correction would be required in the building pads, and structures could then be supported on conventional spread footing foundations. In the area of boring 2 at the northeast comer of Parcel B, the potentially compressible soils extend to about 18 foot depth, which is below the groundwater level. At this location, it would be possible to excavate the poor quality soils, but extensive dewatering would be required, and a very large excavation would be needed because of the oversi~ing around the building footprint that would be necessary. Furthermore, granular fill would have to be imported, because the excavated soil would not be reusable. Thus excavation and replacement in the area of boring 2 does not appear to be economical; although it is technically feas~le. Another alternative for a building in the area of boring 2 would be to support it on driven piles. Because of the lengths involved, treated limber piles may be a suitable foundation type. Alternatively, steel pipe piles could be used. For preliminary budgeting pm'poses only, driven piles in the area of boring 2 would be about 40 feet long in order to achieve at least 20 feet of embedment into the underlying clay till, and could probably cart7 a safe working load on the order of 25 to 30 tom, after due allowance for down&ag or negative skin friction. When your plans are being developed and more is known about the type, location and size of building, we can provide more precise length and capacity estimates for various pile types. An intermediate foundation solution for the area of boring 2, between excavation/replacement and driven piles, would be to improve the soil in that area with the use of GeopiersTM, after which the building could be supported on conventional footings. C-copiers'" are comprised of very stiff, -9- Mixed Use Development, Mound STS Project 97658 densely compacted aggregate piem, made of well lp~led stone such as agEregate base course used in highway construction. They are formed by drining a hole in the matrix soil, and prestressing and densifying the soil at the bottom of the hole. The aggregate is then placed in thin lifts and densely compacted with a high energy impact densification system to approximately 110% of Modified Proctor dry density. The tamper is beveled, and i~ designed in such a way that si~i6cant lateral stress build-up occurs in the soil surroundl-g the drilled hole, in most matrix soil types and conditions. This process effectively prestresses the soils vertically and horizontally so that the effect of future loads is diminished. The result is a composite Geopier'~-soil matrix reinforced soil of si~i~cantly improved modulus, ~ff'ness, and capacity to control settlements. After installation of the Geopiers"' on a defined pattern which must be designed, the building can be supported on conventional spread footings. Some soil improvement and replacement would be required for pavements surrounding the buildings at this site. Pavements at this site should bear on a minimum 3.5 foot thickness of granular soil to distribute the wheel loads. In some areas, which are known to be underlain by peat, a geotextile separator fabric should be used. between the native site soil and the granular sub-base course. The geofabfic improves the constmetability and lrafficability, and tends to prolong the pavement life, because it reduces the tendency for fine grained soils to be forced upward into the sub-base or base course under the kneading action of traffic. 4-~ Preliminary Foundation Recommendations Based on the limited soil boring information, it appears that the major portion of Parcel B, exclusive of the east half of the presem baseball diamond in the northeast comer, and the south half of Parcel A, the depth of fill organics and upper soft clay is less than 11 feet. In these areas, it is our opinion that the poor soils could be excavated and replaced with compacted fill_ Buildings in these areas could then be supported on conventional spread footings. Excavations to 11 foot depth or less should not encounter si~fcant groundwater intrusion. The fill used should be an imported sand, or on-s/re, inorganic lean sandy clay which is moistu~ conditioned -10- lVftxed Use Development, Mound STS Project 97658 to within 2% of the opt~m~rm moistm~ content determined f~rom the Standard Proctor compaction test. For preliminary planning purposes, a net allowable soil bearing pressm~ of 2,500 pounds per square foot may be used for footing design, although it is possible that this value can be raised after further study. We strongly recor, mend that additional borings ~hould be taken to the west and south of boring 2, to better delineate the extent of the poor soil deposits. In the area encompassing boring 2 within Parcel B, and approximately the north half of Parcel A, the depth of poor, potentially compressible soil appears to be in the range of 8 to 18 feet. At these locations, it may be possible to exCaVate the soil and replace it with compacted fill. However this may not be economical, because the excavated soil is not reusable and would have to be hauled oft-site. New fill would have to be imported to replace it. Excavations deeper than "-. about I 1 feet will require dewatering, which would add to the cost of the excavation and replacement method. We recommend that you should consider the use of OeopiersTM- We recommend that the GeopiersTM should extend totally through the fill, topsoil, peat, and organic clay/silt, to a tip elevation that reaches the top of the underlying stiff sandy clay glacial till. After installation of the Geopiers"', the building could be supported on conventional spread footings. GeopiersTM should also be installed under interior floor areas of buildings within the poor soil ZOIleo Another alternative for the portion of the site surrounding boring 2 and the north half of Parcel A 'would be to support new structm~ on driven piles. Depending on the loads to be carried, Class B treated timber piles or steel pipe piles which are later filled with concrete would be suitable, although it is likely this altemative'would be more expensive than Geopiers"". We would be pleased to provide specific pile foundation recommendations, when building plans have been developed. -11- Mixed Use Development, Mound STS Project 97658 4.3 Ground Supported Floor Slabs In the areas of the site which can be conventionally soil con,~ed (excavation and replacement), the ground supported floor slabs can bear directly on the compacted fall. The modulus of subgrade reaction of the fill would vary, depending on whether a sandy clay or imported sand fill is used. We would be pleased to advise further on this matter, if requested. In the portions of the site where GeopiersTM are used, we recommend that the area below the floor slabs should also be corrected by means of C, eopicrsTM. A standard ground-supported floor slab design may then be used above such a corrected area. If driven piles are used, we recommend that the floor slabs should be swu~ slabs, also supported on piles. 4.4 Exterior Pavement Areas We do not recommend major soil conv:tion in the exterior pavement areas. However there should be sufficient excavation and r~plac~nent to provide a minimum 3-1/2 foot thickness of compacted granular soil (combined sub-base course and base course) below the pavements. If this is done, conventional flexible pavement designs can be used. If peat or organic silt soils are exposed at the base of the subgrade excavation, a geofabric separator should be installed prior to placeanent of the imported granular FaIL 4.5 Construction Considerations Underground utility lines at this site which have invert elevations of about 937 feet or higher should not encounter si~ificant groundwater intrusion. If groundwater seepage into the trench occurs, it could be controlled by conventional pumpiag from a sump pit_ For sewer lines having invert elevations lower than about 937 feet, groundwater inmadon into the trenches should be anticipated. However the rate of infiltration should be Iow enough that it - 12- lv~ed Use Development, Mound STS Project 97658 could be controlled by pumping. dewateriag. The soils at this site are not conductive to well point 4.6 Winter Construction The sandy clay soils at this site are not conducive to winter earthwork, and this should be avoided- Placement of Fall and/or foundation concrete must not be permitted on frozen soil, and the bearing soils under footings or floor slabs should not be allowed to freeze after concrete is Placed, because excessive post-construction settlement could occur as the frozen soils thaw. 4.7 Construction Safety All excavations must comply with the requirements of OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P "Excavations and Trenches". This document states that excavation safety is the responsibility of the contractor. Reference to this OSHA requirement should be included in the job specifications. The responsibility to provide safe working conditions on this site, for earthwo~ building construction, or any associated operations is solely that of the contractor. This responsibility is not borne in any manner by STS Consultants, Ltd. 4.8 Field Observation and Testinz We recommend thai the earthwork and footing installations for this project be observed and tested by a geotechnical en~neer or qtmli~ed engineering technician to determine if the soil and groundwater conditions encountered are consistent with those anticipated based on our exploration* Foundation subgrade should be tested to check for adequate bearing conditions. Subgrades for slabs, pavement and new structural fill should be test rolled and ~m~titable areas improved. Fill placement and compaction should be monitored and tested to determine that the resulting fill conforms to specified density, strength or compressibility requirements. Structural -13- Mixed Use Development, Mound STS Project 97658 materials should also be tested for conformance to specifications. STS would be pleased to provide the necessary field observation, monitoring and testing services during construction. 4.9 General Qualifications This report has been prepared to aid in the planning of buildings at this property and to assist the architect and/or engineer in the design of this project. The scope is limited to the specific building project and location described herein, and our description of the project represents our understanding of the significant aspects relevant to Soils and foundations. When more definite building plans have been developed, we should be given the opportunity to r~view and update our report. Some additional borings will also be required. We recommend that we be retained to review the project plans and specifications to determine if the recommendations contained in this report have been interpreted in accordance with our intent. Without this review, we will not be responsible for misinterpretation of our data, our analysis, and/or our recommendations, or how they are incorporated into the final design. Because of the possibility that unanticipated substuface conditions may occur, we recommend that a "Changed Conditions" clause'be inclUded in the contract with the general contractor and subcontractors involved in the foundation im'tall~on, earthwork, and general construction. The inclusion of this clause will permit contractors to quote lower prices because they will not need contingencies for unanticipated condition.~ Providing for equitable adjustments to cost and schedule for verified changed conditions will generally mcluce delays, unnecessary costs, conflicts and litigation. Experience demonstrates that a partnering approach between the owner, architect and contractor usually allows the most timely, cost-effective and risk acceptable actions to be taken to remediate a changed condition. Furthermore, a prompt investigation of changed conditions and prompt communication of findings helps to reduce the immense problem of trying to present facts if a dispute develops. In the event that the owner and contractor do not agree that a changed - 14- Mixed Usc Development, Mound STS Project 97658 condition exists, we recommend that a mediation/arbitration procedur~ be pursued. If you wish, we would be pleased to furnish additional information pertaining to this procedure. A suggested wording is given on a separate sheet enlitled ~Caanged Concliiions Clause" in thc Appendix. -15- ~v¢ Solutions for Land Planning and Design Hoisington Koegler Group ~nc. i-nl i ln ,' CEiVED "'"'- '" ,2000 MEMO ?,,, -, October 23, 2000 To: City of Mound Staff, Planning Commission, and Council From: Bruce Chamberlain Mound Visions Coordinator Re: MetroPlains Development Proposal - former high school site. Redevelopment of the former high school site will play a significant role in the character and success of the future downtown Mound. As a result, it seems appropriate to prepare staff comments relating directly to the proposal's relationship with the Mound Visions plan. Mound Visions' primary design mission... The Mound Visions plan was developed and is continually refined to create a destination downtown district with urban form (as opposed to suburban). A district that is "place appropriate", multifaceted, concentrated, and inter-linked. The goal of Mound Visions is to construct private development espousing the elements just identified within a fabric of high quality and inter-linked public spaces. The project as it relates to Mound Visions... From an overall standpoint, Staff feels that the sketch plan submitted by MetroPlains upholds the mission of Mound Visions and will strengthen the urban character of the downtown district. The retail project strengthens the built core and "greets" pedestrians at the 15/110 intersection. The plan suggests handling the high parking demands of grocery retail in ways that minimize negative impacts to the character of adjacent streetscapes. The residential portion of the project has an urban form with housing that is inter-linked with parks and pedestrian ways. The residential neighborhood suggests a comfortable level of intensity with opportunities for strong neighborhood ties. Parks are used as "gateways" to the neighborhood and enhance the linkage between the residential and the core downtown. Even though the sketch plan demonstrates the basic constructs necessary to uphold the Mound Visions principles, it is obviously very preliminary and needs a greater level of detail before we can fully understand its impact on the future of downtown Mound. Staffhas the following specific comments on the plan. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph (612) 338-0800 Fx (612) 338-6838 Memo- Mound Visions, MetroPlains skemh plan nview October 23, 2000 Page 2 of'2 '0 Buildings "H" & "J"' arc proposed to be located at the street edge with the suggestion of'an urban plaza at the 15/110 intersection. High-quality street-side fagade treatments and plaza design will be critical - especially since there will be long '" building facades without retail entries. The relationship between retail building"r' and the closest residential flat could either be uncomfortable or extremely interesting and unique - depending on how the area is fenestrated. Staff suggests that particular design attention be paid to this small area. Since there is a ~p in building facades between buildings "Ir' and "J" al°ng 110, that stretch of streetscape should be given special attention to ensure an interesting and attractive edge. The site entry off of Lynwood Boulevard and the follow-up driveway split between the oommen:ial entry and the residential entry seems to need greater attention and maybe more formal urban character through use of a round-a-bout or similar street element. The sketch plan suggests a strong pedestrian connection past the commercial storefronts between the residential neighborhood and the core downtown. A high level of streets~pe treatment will be necessary to make pedestrians comfortable in using the connection. The plan suggests that the residential development be mostly inwardly focussed. This is of special note on Elm Road where there are existing homes facing the development site and new homes facing away from the street. Special treatment should be given to the green space south of Elm Road to minimize the negative impacts of back yards facing the street. Design of the ponding basin needs to be well conceived in order to make it an amenity to the neighborhood. I ~SER VER ~c~n~e U~t O UN D ~9 9-£ 4 ~T S~newo141-doc V~OS3NNIH *aNno~ · D~ '&N3HdO~3A3G SNIVqd O~&3H £N3~dO33A3a 3SN Ill ! 1111111111111111 1 s' 0 -e- CITY OF MOUND H_ARDCOVL=R CALCtJI. A~ON~ LOT AREA LOT AREA SQ. FT, X 30% = (far all la~ .............. X S~ ~. X 15~ = (for ~~ ~ldings only) 'Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided ~hat Techniques are ,,~iilzed. as ou~tined in Zoning Ordinance SaclSon :350:1225,Subd. 6. B. 1. (see bac~. A plan taus= ba and al=proved by 1;he B~lding Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ ,-'T HOUSE DETACHED BLDGS X ~ (GARAGE ./.~HED) DRIVEWAY. PAP, ICING AREAS, SIDEWALK:S, ETC. ~IEC~$ Ol~e~ d,,cka [1/4." min. X ~ X ""' TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC .................. × -- X ~ OTHER X ~ ~/~ TOTAL OTHER ......................... I~ ]~l~[ TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE Q OVER (indic_~e difference) ............................... PREPARED B DATE~ C~TY 01= ~OUNO LOT AREA~ LOT AREA sa. ~. x ~o,~ = ~ =~ ~m) ....................................... SQ. FT. X 40% = (far Lats at' ~cam) ............................. SQ. Fr. x 15% = (f~r cl~ached ~uiiclings only) .................. D=-'I'ACHED BUILDINGS CG~i=,;AGE/SHED) DRIVEWAY, PARKING ARF_A$, $K3EWAL.K$, ETC. X · 'I~TAL DECK .... · TOTAL X ~ TOTAL OTHF_~ .................................................... IMI~FJ~.VIOU$ SURFACE .................................................. ADDRESS: SURVEY ON FILE?. YES / NO LOT OF RECORD? YES / NO IIOUSE ......... FRONT FRONT SIDE SIDE REAR LAKE TOP OF BLUI~ ZONING DISTRICT. LOT SIZE/WIDTH: R2 ~o. ooo/,o ~50~ _R~J~ 61000/40 B2 20,000/80 ~ e,ooo/4~ ~ ~o.ooo/eo ~ ~4.ooo/8o R3 ~ORD. I2 30.000/200 ~ISTING/PROPOSF, D F=XIETING LOT SIZE: LOT WIDI LOT DI~PTH: YARIANCK N $ E w N S E W N $ E w N S E w N S E W N $ E W 15' 10' OR ~0' GARAGE, $1IED ..... DETACIIED BUILDINGS FRONT .SIDE SIDE REAR LAKE TOP OF HLUFF ltARDCOVER (.~ONFORMING? YES I NO N S E W N S E W N S E W N S E W 30~ OR 4' OR 6' 4' OR 6' 10' OR 30' ? ]BY: j DATED: This Zoning lnformndo, Shce! only mmmadles a poflion of dm requirements omlined in the Chy of Mound Zoning O~inance. For fur~er information, contact the CJ. lty of Mound Planning l.~rtmem at 472-0600. 50.4 i 50.4 ! 584 188.2 I~O~WC BELL. THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK F'r CAN L~, I- r- ~ ~ ,~ ................................................................... ~ ,> ..... ~ ~ / ,,_~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ ~::::~::::::: ::~::::;:::::~:~::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::]] ::.:..'..: ::::::::: ::::::::: :x:::::: :;::::::: ::::,~,:::::i:?-.~:::~::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::i!! !i:l:::::: ::::::::: ::: ru:~-.i~tl:: ~ ~ :::::::::i ,'~ ::::::::: :::::::~: ::::::::: :::t::::: ::::::::: ::::o~ ~i::: ::::::::: ::::::::: \ X' .. /.'/ /4/ / ~' '~:~' C L FU ~RE STRE I' I ................ 0'~: "'1 .................. / '~ ..... ~"' ~ /' ! / , // / z" ::::::::: :: /: ' ' ': : ..................... oo c'~....I ............... ::::: . -'~ ," ~ · ::::::::: ::::::::: ::: ::::: ::::::::: ::::.*:. ::::::::: ::::::::: -- ....,. / - :: ::::::::: ::: !i~,i ' i ]!i i !iiiiiii! ::ii[ i~iiiiii~_ii iiiiiiiii ::::::::: ::: ........ ~ ....................... ~o~ ...... t:i~. ..... ~ ............. ............................................. ..... ~.[ I ..... ~ ........... ::::::::: ::::::::: ::~::::: :: :::::: :::::::::~,~,~,o~,:,,, .... .-.::=: ::::::::: .~.. ::::::::: ::::::::: ::~::::: ::l:::::: ::::::::: O~£R:EXI!.TING::::: ~:::..:: ::::::::: [] ::::::::: ::::::::: ::e,:::::::: :::::: ::::::::: ::::~5~':RC~:::::::: ~:::~:: ::::::::: I~" :::::: ::::::::: ::~.:::::::~.:::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: · .~et.~ ........... '~..':~ 't.':'": ........ : .................................... · ~:~ .......... ~ / ::::.::-: ::::::::: ..~ ...................... i ........................... I ......... . ::::::::: ::::::::: ::o::::: .~::::: :::::::::i::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::I::::::::: \ ............ :~ ....... , ...... ~ ...... ~:::~:::: :~::::::: ::::::t:: :~:~::;~: ::::::::~ :::::::::::::::::::::::: .:;::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::;:r: :::::;;;: :;::::;:: ::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::: ::1:::::: ::::::::: :;:::::o:,~:::::::: ::1:::::: ::;;;~: ::::::::::::::::::: :::::£~,,:s::~,o~ ::::::::: ::::::::~::~:::::::: ::::::::: ~ \ ,, ~.dl~,' ~, ,, _ \ .. ~ .... ::::::::: :: :::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :: ~::'% :~: :--~::~:::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :: :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: : ::::::;:;' ::::::;1: :::::;::: :: ~:?h4:'.::::': 6;;:;;::; ;;::::;;: . · · ' ' '~'~ ~',* ~ , ............................................... o.~. ,,~.~..,,. . .................. ........ ,,,,.,, . .................................. .~.,~ .;. ..................... - ::;~4:4: ::::::::: ::::::::'~' ::::::~V(S::~2+50 ........ ......... '~.~.~,:, ....................... ................. ~%%%%: :::::::: :::::::::11:::::::: ::::::::: ::-:::::: :~:~?:~:::::::: ::::::::: . .~.~ o~ ......................... . .................. ~n. :~ ................. L"~J . ...~ ~ ~,. w - ~... ,.~,~, ~ ~ ~,, ~.,~ ¢~ , ~ · ~ ,.o~ ~,,~ ,.~ ................................. BVC F~. ~g40.35 ................ m .................. ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::~:~:::::::: ::::::::: ~ ,:~g~ ~¢ .-:I~ ,Y'~'2~' ~C~'~.[J; ~:~ _~ ~' ........................... ~'~ ~ .............................................. ........ : ..: ...... ::,.:1:::1 :::::::~ :;::~:::: ;:::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::: -o " : : : : ........................... ~K!~9 ;z ............. ... c~ ......... ~ ::' .:. :: ::: .,: : : : : : : :: L'%J /. '\ - . .............. ,.: :::::.:.: .................................. !!:::i~!~ ~ii~ ::::i::!iiii ~ :!i~:!i!i!!!::! ::!::::!::::::i :::::::::::::::! i::i::i::::::i i::ii::i::i:: \ ~;:'-~.,,! ?1/":i;/t,,/':' ::~::::~: ~;1:;~ ~:~::~:: ~;:;~: ~::i::~: ~:~:~:::: ;:::::~: :~::~:::1 ::~::~::: ............................... ~a ............................................. ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::.. :::::..~ ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ............. :::;l ::::::::: ::::::f~ ::;:::::: ::::::::; ;;:::l:;: ;:;:::;:: :::::::'.; ~, \ ~)~ ~ / ::;~¢~i ::i:::::: ::::::::: :::::~;s~:~ ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :: .... -..: i:::::::; ::1:1;:::(~;; .... ~ ............. ~1; ::::::;:: :1:1::::: ::::;:::1 .................................. ~ , =~ ,r_~, L~6, ,. .. .-- , - -;!!: ..:: i i:!!!!ii: !ii : : i~: !!~ '"' :":;t_ , .,~'~)x/' , o~ ' ' ' ' · ,:::!::::: ::::!:::; ::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: :::: ::::::::: .............. ,' "lg, ............................. ~ ' '~' ................... r +74 8 C/L .H~E., [EAI~ .Il ............................ ~.o ................... ............................. .......... : ............................. ......... :::~.::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ;: :,::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ;:::::::: ::::::::: ................... : u, , " .~;' --'~~-~ Yl'~ ~" I' i h~ 'x ~,' .... : : ::::::::: ::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: · ~,,.~ ............................................................................ '~.~. ~ I", ~'~ ,I,.i .~, ~ ¢ _ . .................. ::::: :~ ::~:~ :::::::~: ::::::::: ]Z::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::; ,.--~ ':.~!-'"~% '~( '~" t!-- ~ G1' · ::::::::. :::::::: .......... ! I. ................................................. . .- =~'", -~ 'X'L~,'~[':~ ~, ¢' .,~ · ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::'::: ~:::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :~, '. ',,.~'~',?"~\,~ ~L~¢ ~ ' :::::::::: ::::::::: :::: ~ ~~~."'"x., L.~ ~-~ ¢~' . Z:::Z:::: Z:::::::: :::: ...................... : ........................... I ......... \~ '% ~ - ~. %", ~,, ~0 . ' ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::t:::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::,::::::::: '%~",, 'k 1 ~.V,;~, x . :, :::::-::: :::::::::::::::::::::::1:::: :::::::::;:::::::::::::::::: :::::::::.::::::::: % \ ~ ', '%'~\ ~: v. ~*~ ' ::e~.~: :::::::i: ::: :it :: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ~, '", ~ \ ~\~' · '~ ::~?~:B~:~S~,uo~o~..:4-:::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::::::::::: '~ ',.. \ \, ~'~ \ ................................ '. ....................................... I ......... ::::::;:: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::i::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::I::::::::; ::::::::: ::::;:::: ;:::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::;:::: ~,'~.- :::::.::.'::::::::: :: :::::: ::::::1::: :::::::::'::::::::: :::::::~: ::::::::: ::::::::: ~'.,~- '\ -,, ',, k'- L,\", \ ..................................................................................I ::~:4~.:Z: :::::::'.: ::;:;:::; ::::::::: ::::;:::: ;;;:::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::'-:::::; ~ ;~ ~ ~ =1 o 0 o o o 5 \ '~ .b'k ~ ', x '- ................................................................................ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ _= B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ o, , , %,~,~ .'~ ................................. ~ ................................................ ................................................................................. ~ oi~ ~,,, ~,,, ., ,.., , .................................................................................. ................................................................................ ::::::::: ::::::::: .......................................................... o ................................ t ................................................ :;::::::; :Z::::::; ::::::;:: ;:;::.::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: Z:::::::: x .............................................................................. : ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::|::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ,~-.~-~-::::::!!!i ...... i .... ! ................. ! ....... !"!' !"ii!;'i i!iiiii:i ::~':a ....................... { ................................ _m ~{~ · ~ ~_ ~" ~ ~_ · ~_ / .-~ .~ ~..;, o~'~-~_, 7+go ...................... .............:: :'.=5'Y.: ::: '.::::: C./L .. ,E:I'tI'E'R"' : : (~ :lCk£:: .., ................................................ -~· ~n~i~ c~ ~ ~- ~m ~' I~ ~ ~ ~'~' '~i~ _/.-/ .... " ~' ' ?.~"'~' "// ~ "\ *"":'¥.~ '., ~0:""/' ~'"~ ~ \ ........................ ................. ............... ;: ................... _ ................................................................................ :::::::: :::::: :::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ~ ~ ~ ~ m m . ' ~ '~-/ " ~ ~ ~' , ................................................................................ m o ~ g :~ :e ~,' ' h \ "\ ::::::::: ::::' ... :::::::': ::::::'-:: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ~ .................... + = o "\ ~k~Tk i!!!iii:: ii:iiiiii ii::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::: : : ~ I ~ " h. '~\ ............................................................. ~, ',, \ '~ \ LM ::::::::: ::::::::: ::~:~: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::; :::i:~:~ :::~::::: ::::::::: 811 ~ ',, ' ~ ,, ~ i:!!!!!!! !:!!!!!!i :!:::: ~ iiii!!!!! iiiii!!i! !iii!!::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ~-~ ~[ \ ,,, \ o ::3 · .,,~.~.~, ........ ::: ::::: : ::::::::: ::::::::://::::: ::::::.:: ~.,, .~,. ~§~.o , ............................ :/ :t EVC~ 10(0.25: ......... ~ . .e97 oo .......... .............. :ZJ: ......... ,:::::::::~:::::: : ....................... ,,~ .......................... : : ::: ::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ~ · ~7_,. ~ ii:::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::~/:iiT/i"'~':~:: ::::::::: ::::::::: ''990-50' : ::::::::: ::::::::~ ':::::::B~ £::~d. 50: :.:::::::: ::::::::: ' -; ~ ~ ~o~ ~ ::::::-: ..................................................... ::::::::: ::::::::: ..-. ::::::::: ::: : ::::: ::::::::: ::::::~':. ::::::::: ::::::::: ::: :::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::;P::.:: .... ~ ~ '--- ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::11::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ~:::::~i~:::::: · ..,~..~:: :: ......... /,,'i ..... ,,~.. ~,~ ....................... ~I~''"'- ........................ ]:::::::: :.::.:::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ~ !!iiiiiii :i::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::/ii:::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: L/) :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::- '~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::.::::::::: ~ .:::- ::::::::: ::::::::: .: ......................... ! ................................... ~ .... ' ' '" ....................... I~ ............................................... · .: ..... :: : :: ...... :: [, ~ . :..: ...... : ................... ......................... P~.I....~ ............................................ , -. ~ /I ~ ....................... I: ...................... ~ ::::::::: ':::::::: ::::::::' ::::::::: ::'.:::::: ::: ::::: :::::: ': :: ::: ..~;~::, ~. ::::::::: ::::::::: :::,~.~!, ~:::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: · ~ :::::::::'::::::::: ::::::: : ::::::::: .: .......... ~-.. ~,,, ....................... 1 ::::::: :: :: ::: :::::,::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: .............. ........................................................ 5+75 ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::: :: :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ;i : :::::: ::::::::: :::.+':::: ::::::::: :::::::::i::::::::: ..... :':: ::::::::: ::::::~ ~'~'~' '-~"~ : :::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::': ................. ~ ....... : ::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::: ' ::;,;,;:~:: ::::::::: :::::-: :::,~s;.,+~o ...... ;..::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ....................................... :i~.~oi: ::::::::: ::::: ::: :::::::::::::::::::::"IT::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ................................................................................ o.q~zzzzzzz ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::: ...... : .................... ! ........................... __ ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: · = ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: =~' '*~ ~,~ ~" !!~!!!~!:::::..::::::::::~.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~.:::::::::::..:::::::::::::::::: ~ ~. ' ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ~ ~ ~'h,'.~ ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ........................... ,::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: , :"~ 0 fl. -! I I I/ !' Ii, -~ I/ b ~,1\''~ I , q~.~ ..~ i!iiiii iiiiiiiii i i.~ i :i_:.:::: ::::::::: ::::::::: i"i ............................. !i'i ii~ii-i!i iiiii'":*::':I:::: :::::::::i::::::::' .......................................................... : ........................ · ': ', ......... .,'c~.;! ................ :~:::~::: ~:~;:: ::::::~:: :::;~;~:: ~::::~::: :~:~: ::: ::::: ::::::;;;l::::~::;: ;x!i?'".. 2 'i; ...... t ~ 8.'~ ....... . ...... ¢...,i~ :::::::::::::::::: ::::::::i:::::::: :::::::: :::: :: i :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::ii ::i::i:: ::::i::ili::i ::::::::i::i'::i :::::2:::::::::::~2 ::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :~/::;;::: :2:2:2;:2 ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::ii::::: i}::::::: ::i:::::: :i:i:ii!i : ~1~ ::::;::. ]::.:::::: ...................... .............. o., ................. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ..... ':,?!!!! !!!!!!!!! !!!!!! !! ! !:!!m : :::::::: :::::!::: ' ::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: : ~'~ :Il:: ::::: ::::::::: ":: ....................... ........................... .... ! ..................... ::.--:::: ::::::::: ::::2:2: , ........................ :: ::. ;:.~: ......... -- .~ ~, T8 ........... !/'~ ........... :::::::: :::::::: .................. iiiiiiiii iiiiii::: ::::::::: :: =,.. :il :: ::;~ ' ......... ......... : ............ ..... I~/' ........................................ ::::::::: :::;::;:: :;::;:::: ::}2::::~ll:lii! :: :: : ::: :: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::: i~:l:J:l ~.: :: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: L .................... :~ ......... a ........................................ ::::::::: :::::::;: :;;~:.;1~:::: ~:::'~'J[~l: ~::;: ::::;:::: ::::::::; ::::::::: ::::::::: ~ '", t' : . . ::::::::: ::::::::: ~o°::::~m::ll::l::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: L'~'J o ::::::::: ::::::::: Z,::: :!.~:'ii ~// :: : ::::::::: :::::::::, .................... r~ .... [?,~ ................................................. ::::::::: ::::::::: =======================:::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .......................... ~ '~ .................................................... ::::::::: :::::::::i:~..:l:::Xi :' :: :': ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: i ~ ~ ~- " ::::::::: ::::::::: :Z::::~:: ::: : :: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::: ! ' ; i ; ,. ::::::i::::!:::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::i:::::: i::::::!::!:::: 0 -...: 'dIliliiiii:::::i::::::::: ::': .................................... .............. ~ ..... II,.l..... .............................. :" ~i ..... Il:/:::::: ............................................. ..................... ~:-:::: IZl:::::: :::::::::I::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: !!iiiiiii iiiiii i' : ii!! !iiiiiiii iii:::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: : :: ~ I , i ,,i,i ..... ' ::::::::::::::::::i:::::://1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ~ ! ;~*;-~ ! I -" ... ::::::::: :::::::::::::::::fi:':':::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::,::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::~ ::::::":'::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::' :::::/t: ::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ..~:::::: I ~,- ! ~- ...... '- ....... . .... , ...... II~J ............................................ ~. . -.o. I -.i-.i ....... i .... i!::i i:!tt41..:;c.~;.: ;:.i_ ~: ~.; ;:; ':;;,:; i.c ::: ~: :: "' ::::::::: : !~: !~li:.l :iiiiii:i iii'::::: :::::::-: :-::::::: ::::::::: .-~.:::-:: ,-~. ~//~i:.! ~ ..... /" '~"~1"" ........ '-' ....... '-:" ..... ~ ' ~"~ ~' ' '" ................. r ....................................................iri ;~ . L .~ ~ I · ................ : ................. ~1~, Q ....... II ............................ · , c'~ ~ ' .................................... ii"ii' iii ::~,iiiiiiiii iiiiiiiii~,'~ii:::i ~', " :~:!"' ' ': ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::~ ' ' '; ~'\i ~[ ~'~':::::::~'": :::":: ::::::::: :::::::!: ::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ~,~ ~&i~:~:: :::::::!i: :::M~,~': :::::::::,~L~:~ :::l_~.':: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::12121 ~'* :, ~ ~[~i'*i ~ ...... . m.~s ......... ~ .... ,~"~ ................. t---;"~-.~ ....................... ~ ~t, '~'~ -:~,i 1 ~ ............ : ..... ' ................ : ......... '~ ......... , ..... ~ ........ '~ ....................... ~ ................ ~ .................... -~ - :: ~ ' ~ L ~ ~,~ ~ -'~. ..... ................ I ..... ~ ........... ' ....................... ,'.~ ::::::::: ::::::~t: :: :: :: :::::::::,:::::~:~- ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ......... , ...... ~ ....:J :::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::;::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: , ' :'' ~ ..................................................... ! \i1' ~-*~ -'~*~'t- ............. ~.- ........................... ::':::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::: ...................... F ~ ~3 ~ ' ' / , :: ::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: , ~t~l~it~ ~ ii~i i ...... ~. ..... ::::::::: ":-:: .............................. ..................................... ............................. ::::::::: ::::::::: ............................................. i~ 0 ~ ! Ii i I ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::,::::::::: ::::::::: :::iiiii: ;iiiii;ii :::::::::,::.::.:::::::::::: :':": ........................ ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::;;; ............................... ;;:;;;;:; ;;::::;:; ;;;;;;::: ........... ::::::::: I :: ::: Z:::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ;::;::;:: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ............................................................... ! .................. ~ I .q i+~t ....... I ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ', ,~. '::::::::: ;:::::::: ::::::::; ::::::::: :::;::::: ::;:::::: :::::::::i::::::::: ::::::::: ................................................................................. ' ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: i ' I :.:4 , I ................................................................................. :::::;::: 2:::2: : I:: :::; ::::::::: ::::::::: ;:::::::2 ::::::2:7:2::::::: ~ I,,,,., } il :. L $~ .... o~ ~'~ ! ~ '. ~ l' ........................................... iff ~ :~ ~.~ , . :::::::::1::::::::: ::::::s:l:::ff::f: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: : ::: :::::::'~:l..l[;:: ': :: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::~ ::::::::: ~'~:ii~l:: :: ~:::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::i:::::::::::::: i::i:::::::::::: ~::~!::l::ill::i ::i ,::::::::::::!i ::::!::::::::::! :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ........................ ~ ....... r~. ........................................... ................... .,.-~'.~!:1::11 ..... ,, ................. . ........................... .......... ~..T.i' . ,.. . ~ ........ t ............... .................. '-'"1"" .....Il ~'--~ ........ ......... ' ........................... ' ;;i , ~, i ......... f,.~ ' ' * *h'. ' * - ............................. ::::::::: ::::::::: -~'~:' ............................................. ::::::: .................. ~' ,( ~' ........ I ............................................. 11::::::: :Z::::::: :::::: :: : :1:::: ::::::::: :::;::::: ::::l:::: ......................... : ..... :': :-::::::: :::::::: :: :: ::: : ....... ~ ................ ;" 7'"* ........................................... ' ~ ~ ' ~ ! "~ ' ' ......... ~1,~-, ......... -. I1~-:..., .................................... j ..... , . ...... ...... :~1 .... ..................................................... .................. ..~10 ......................................................... i ~ t I .................. ..~ .... , ....... : : 1: :::::: :11:::::: :::::::::J~ ' i~ - . ::::::::: ::::::::: ~¢~:~::: Il:: ::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ......... [ .......... r* '";-¢-'1/1 ....................................... , ........... ~1 ii ~ I / .............. -~=.' · *i- --Itt .... : ........ L: ........ " ....... _': ....... :::'" _. i:iii:i::!:::::::-:: :::::~:l:::c:: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::~.~ I--.J :::::::~1::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::-~,V;..~ ~, :::::::8i::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::;: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::.~,~ I-&--1 :::::::::I?-~:~: ::: ~1'-~:- ~ ~: . -,. ~-2_2 ~ : ii ', :'i -~/I/ ........................ ; ...... '... , ~ ,' , ~ ~ ... ..~ .I \ -~ ~'% / / ................................................................................. ~ , J , ~ ' l', ~ ! / -'"-'- [ x / / I ...................................................... ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::1::::::::: ::::::::: :7::::::: :::::.'::: ::::::}::::}i:: ::::}::::::::::i ::::i::i:::::::: ::}:::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::i::' ::::::::: ::::::::: :::;:I~:.I~: : : : : : : : : : : ::: ............ ..................... ,-,o.I;ll.~ ...................... :::.:::.: ..::..:: ....... :.: ,..- [, ~, ,, / ) ::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::-:::::::':: .~::::::: ::-~:::::: :::+::::: ::::~J--~-I .......................... Il 1..I.~ ........... ................................. : ::::: ~.eo:w:: 0".',;_~: :: :: .':: ::: ; ::: :: :~1~ ::::::::: Mt,.~:~:: :::i;: ::I..~'~T..::::: '::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: / / ......... : ........................... ........................................ ~' ' ' ':'-;f ' I ' ' ' ' "' :::::::;: :;::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::; :::::;::: ::::::::: ;;:;:;:;; :::::;;:: :::::;::: ;:::::;:; ;:;;;;;;; ;;::;;;;; ;;';;';;; , .......................................................... ! ......... i...ii!iiii!i @l " 'i -' / .................................... . ............ i!!i!!!!i ii'E'"~'i'i'" : : : ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: . o~. I ............................... /!1 ~ "'~ · \ .. - ................ ~ ........................... :.:..:::. ;::;:;:;; ::: ..... : **':'":'. r-- ....................................................... ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ......... · ....................... , .................................... . .......... z ......... ' ~. "' Z / '~ i" ::::::::: ::::::::~ ::: ~:l::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::, ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::.'~4, : :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ?.:4::.-~.: ::::::::: ~s4.~,::_:: ::: ===================== :_::: ...... ._. ......... _. ..... ~=..~ :::::: :: :::::::;~u~:~:\J'"::::':,::::"::' :": ................ : ...... ~ ..... ' .................. ; / / / ?d~? , ~ '. ......... ~ ~ ._,~ .... . ~ ' ' ' *'; ...... :~; ....... .--: .... P~2.~ "' ........................... , '- i / I ! :, ~,~',, \ ' ................ ,*...,~ .',.r-' ...... I ...................................................... / , II!/ ~ '~.~' ; x '~. · ::::::::: :::::::~ ~-:: ::::J::::::::: ::::::::: ;:::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :~:::::: / ~, /' // ~ J~,~!. k ',, ~ " : :: :: :: ,~ Tt ::::J~::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ~;;~::::: / ¢'~, Q~ / /.'*4 I~,; "~ ",\ ", ................ ~ .... ; 7 II .................. , ..................................... , / '~'*-q%, '/- ~. ~ ~ '., - ' ,, ::::::::: :::::::~!:: ::i:[f::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::~ / ' /,~' , ~. '~ ' ::::::::::::::::::::::: ~,== ======================== =,-:.=='===="! ==.-...=~=~: "='===-..,====",= :===:~ :i,~ ::t :::FI:::::::! :::::::::: :-'::::::: :2 ::::: ::Fi:::: :::::._~_ / '; // / ',, \ :: :: :: ::::::::: :::::::::1..: ....................... ...........................ilil::"::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::J~ ///// ' i '~ ' .............................................................................. / , J'" ' , ", I .................. : ............................................................... /' ' / " \ I~ I . ........ i.i. iiiI ...... ,.. ,, :::::'::: :::::::::::::':::::' '" "'" ' ' ' i! i i , ::::::::: ::::::::: ::¢:::::: ::::::::: :::::: : :: ::f: :::: ! ! : :::':/ .................................. ~"' ::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: :::~:::: ::::::::::::::::::::: ::?::::: ::::::::: :::::::::~:::::::¥: ::::::::: ................................................................................................................................. ................ i .~,:: ............................................. ~ ................ ::::::::: ::::::::: .~:::::::, ................. : ":::":'q:::::: ::::::::: ::~ii!:: :::::::::: :::::::: ,~i~:::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::l/i:: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ,:::::::: 0 .o~....qq ....... ~ · .~eo2,~. ! .... (::) ..... ~g~.ee ... j.. ......... rd~ · .ege.~.f ............... 0 .... ~85.e~ :... I ................. .(~... es~..~e ....................... Qq ...~ ~ ............... o : ~ !i i!!}i~i i!!~ ;i!ii ! !i !~ .0 : ::::l:::: ::::::::: ::::'~":: ::::::::: :!:::::::I::::::::: ::m:::: ::::::::: :::::::::. ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::1:: :::::: ::::::::: :::i:: i: i:iiiiiiii iiiiiiii~ iiiiiii!i iiiii:i:i :i::::::i!:!iiiiii iiiiiiiii I ' i !!!!!. !!! ' ~ :::::: ::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::'. ::::::::: ~ '~ ......................... ~ .......................... ~"i ............................ ~ ..... : ......................... [ .................... ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::'::::::::: :::::/::: ::::!iii: i!iii}i!!i ii!/!i! ~i iiii!ii!; i!ii!!!!i iiii~iiii iiiiiiiiiii!!i!iii iiiiiii;;li;i!!!ii! !i!}!!!ii ii ii! / !!!ii::: illlli::i ii:i:ili: ii:ii::i: ili:i:i:i i:ii:i:i: ili::i:iiii:::::ill i:ii: i;:::ii::i:i :::iii:ii ::i:::::: :i:::::i: :ii:i:ill i ~::::::: ::::::::: ..::::::: 0.::::::: :::::::::0::::::: !~::x::: :::::::::1='::::::: .~.::::::: ::::::::: ~::::::: ~:::::::;::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::, ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::!i!:!i!!i:ii illi::::. :::::i::i ii:i::ill ::i:::::: illi:::i: ili:i:ill :::::i::i':i:ii:::i :ili:illl illli:i:i :i:ili:i: :i:iZi:i: ::i::ili:l:illli:il ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::i!! !!;!!!!!! !!;i!;!;! !i!!!ii;: ::::::::i :::::ii:: :ii:::iii ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::z: ::::::::: ::z:::::: :z::::::: :::::/::::z ::::::::: ::::::::: zz::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::;::::: ::::::::: :::I::::: ::;:::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::: ::::::::: ~..::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :]::::::: ................... ~ ......................... l ......................... ~ ...................................................................... iiiiiiiii~ iiiiii'i' !Xi"'i'i .................. ~ ~ .......... i~'ii'iiiii~ iiiiiii~:[~}ii~~!;iiiiiii!'i'iiiiiill ::¥::::~.~::::::: ::::::::: ¥::::~."::::::1 :: :::::i::: :f-::!~. iilii !ii iiiiii}ii :f_:iii~.i::h: :::: ::::::::: :F:i:~,i,~ ::::::: :::::::.~ ::::~.~: ::::::i:: ii:::::l~ ::~.~::i ::0:~:~:~.~:::::: ::: : ::: ~:~ ~-~ ~ ~:?:~. ~ I ~ ~'~ t ~ ~'~ '"0 ~'~'~ ................ ~'~.~ ........... 0 !0 ................... I~. ...................... .0 ......... l ............ ~ ..... ~I .......... :::'0'": ..... ::::::::: :::::::(~:~ :::::::;: ::::::::: ::..::::: ::::::::: :::::::::.-.::::::: :::::: :: :::::;::: .-::::::::: :::::1::: ::::::::: :.::::::: :::. :::: ::::::::: :.::::::i: ......................................................... ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::: :: ::::::::: :z'::::::: ::::: ::: :::::::::~::::::::: ::: :::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :;::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::;:::1 :: ::::::::: ::Z:~:::: :::::l::: :::::::::1::::::::: :::! :::: :i:i::::: :::::~:: ::::::~/ ::::::::: :::~:::: ::::~/.:: ::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::~:::: ::::~:::: ::::::::: ::::::::-=h~\t::::: ::::::::: illi:i:il illi::i:i ::i::ii:: :i:i::ilt i:illi:i: illi::ill i:Zi:ii::'i::::::il illllli:i ::::i:i:illli:ii:i ili::i:ii::i::i::i: ::::::::: ::;:::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::i::::X;:: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ;:::::::: :::::::::i::::::::: :::::;:;: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::;::::: ::::::::: ::::::::;:::;::;::: :' ::::':':: :::: ........................................................................................................................... ........ ; .... Z.Z ...... :;::; :::::;::: :::;::::: :::;:::::l::Z:7:: : ::;: :;:: :;:;::: : :: ........ : .... : ....... I .................. ';; .... ; ................................................. 7:ill: ::;:':''; :: ............ ;':: ::;;::::; :::;:;:::I::::::::: ::::::::: :::::;::: ::::::::: :;::::::: :::;; ............. ~ .... :''': :::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ;;::::;:: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: m r 0 ~ :::::::::~::::::::~:::::::::::::::::.~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::i:::i::::::::::::::~::!::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::)::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::?::~::::::~ ~ .................................. I .................................... '"'t ................................ ' ..... I: ................................................................ :~ ::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::l:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: :::: :::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::::::::::. :~:::::: ::::::::: i ~ :::::::::1::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::::::::::,::::::::: ::::.':::: ::::::::: ::::: ::: ::::::::: :::: ::: : :::::: :': :::::: ::::::::: '-t'- ::~6~.0: : ::::::::: ::::::'Ji-:'::~6~-2 ::::::::::::':::::-F:: ~&~:i:: ::::;"~:: J65-~:f::: :::::':'l:':: ~65.9:, ::: :::::::'t';': ::~66.fi:: :::::::~_ ::::~68: :::::lc-::: I~d.8:::::,:::::qL::: ~;,a::::: ::::::::: .:::::/::: ::::::::: ::::::::: .::::~::: ::::::::: :::::::.. :::t::::: :::::::.. :::/::::: :::::::.. :.~:..: .............. ] ................................. ~,. ................... :-: :::: :::::,::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::-::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :: ~ ::::: ::::::::: ::::':::: ::::::::: :::::: :: ::::::::: ::.:':::: ::::::::: ::::::-~ ::::~:::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::~::::: ::::::::: :::::::::i::!:::::: ::::::::: :t::::::: ::::::::: :~::::::: ::::::::: ::t:::::: ::::::::: :::::!::: ::::::::: :::::1:::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :i ~ "::::::: ~i:::::: ::::::::: '"::::::~:::::: ::::::::: '":::::: ~:::::: "::::::: ~:::::: '":::::: ~:::::: '~::::::: i~i::::::_.'":::::: ~:::::: i~i::::::;i~:::::: ~:::::: ~:::::: ~::::::: ~,:::::: ::::::::: ~::::::: ~:::::: ::::::::: ~::::::: ~::.::: ~::::::. ~:..:.. ~: ...... ~ ............. ~:::::: ~ ...... ~ ..... ~ ~, ::::: ~. ::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :7::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: 2::::2::: :::2::::: :::2::::: :::2::::: ::2::::" ::::::::: ~::::" ~:::::: ::::::::: ~;:::::: ~:::::: ::::::::: ~J~:::::' ~:::::: ::::::::: ~l~:::::: ::::::::: ~:::::: ::::::::: ~:::::: ::::::::: ~:::::: ::::::::: ~::::::~l~::::::: ::::::::: :::::::~:::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::~:::::: ::::::::1: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::...¢ :::::::.? i¢::I:::: ::::::::: :::::::.? J:/:::::::~::::::::: :::::?:: :/:::::::: ::::::::: :.~:::::?'::::::::: :::::::.~ ::: ::::: :::::.~:: ::::::::: :::.~:::: ::::::::: :::::::::~::: :::: ::::::::: :::::o:: ::::: ::::::::: :::::0:: ':'::::: ::::::::: ::o:::' ':::::::: :::::::" ::::" ': ::::::::: ::::::.:: .... ::::: ::~:::' ':::::::: ~:::''::::::::: ::::::~ ::'" :::'::::::::: ~,, ..... ~ ........................ C~" k .................. ~ ................... ~:) ...... ............... -~, ..... · ........ '.:-, ............. '-~ ..................... ~.~ · ~:: ::::: I ::::::::: :: :::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :~::::::: :::::( :: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::~::::::::: ::::~::: ::::::::: i:::::::.~ :::::.~:: .:::::::: ::::::::. :1::::::: ::::::::: :::::.~:: .~:::::: ::::::::: :.~::::~::::::::: :::::::.~ ::::::::: :::::.~:ti::::::::: :::.~:::: ::::::::: ::::::::: .:::::::: ::::::::: ~! :::: : : ::::::::::::::::::::::: :':: : .... : ................................................................................................... :::::::: : I::::::::: ::::::::~'~::::::: ::;:::::: ::~i::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::1~I~ ::::::::: :::::::::J ::::::::: :: :::::: :::~:::::: ::::::::i :: : : :: :::::::~::1::::::::: ::::::::: :::::~::: ::::::::: o ....... ~ ....... I .............. ~ .... ~1 ....... ~ ~ '" ~ - ' ......... ~'~ ............ ~'1 ............ ' .......................... ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::~ : ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::~::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::1::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::i: :::ii:::: I~ ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::i::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::':::::::'' [NAL COVE AvE, p ~DSE~ODD L&, ~ECAN LA. I"- I- P 0 U C <~<~ ~^SSWOODS ' DRAFT Combined Agreement 1/17/01 JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MINNETRISTA AND THE CITY OF MOUND THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into as of the __ day of ,2001 by and between the City of Minnetrista, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Minnetrista"), and the City of Mound a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Mound"). BACKGROUND 1. The purpose of Agreement, made in accordance with the authority of Minnesota Statutes § 471.59, is to control the public infrastructure impact of development of land in Minnetfista and in Mound in a manner that is in the mutual best interests of both communities. 2. Minnetrista and Mound are each authorized by law to carry out numerous governmental functions within their respective corporate limits, including the construction, operation and maintenance of public streets and roadways, sanitary sewer facilities and municipal water utilities (the "Local Improvements"). 3. Minnetrista and Mound share a common border along the east corporate limit of Minnetrista and the west corporate limit of Mound. Boulevard. A portion of the common boundary is located on or near the centerline of Westedge 5. Minnetrista and Mound each expect that residential development will occur along the common boundary; and that the development will necessitate the construction of new or modified Local Improvements. 6. In order for Mound to supply water service to the new residential developments within Mound, it is necessary and convenient for the water service lines to be located on land lying within the corporate limits of Minnetrista and shown in Exhibit A (the "Property"). 7. Location of the service lines in Minnetrista will also provide the opportunity for Minnetrista and Mound to have access to the other's water service for emergency purposes. JBD-191352v2 MU200-85 8. In order for Mound to adequately provide for the transportation requirements of the new residential development, it is necessary and convenient that existing roadways, including a portion of Westedge Boulevard be improved. The portion of Westedge to be improved is shown on the attached Exhibit B ("Westedge (North)"). 9. The portion of Westedge Boulevard straddles the boundary between Minnetrista and Mound; and it is necessary that the roadway improvements take place in both cities. 10. Mound holds and utilizes a public utility easement over certain lands lying within the corporate limits of the City of Mound, which easement is described in the attached Exhibit C, (the "License Area"). 11. The easement area abuts upon the corporate limits of the City of Minnetrista. 12. Minnetrista anticipates that as residential development occurs in Minnetrista, it will be expanding and upgrading its sanitary sewer system. 13. In order to accomplish such activities it is desirable that space be made available within the License Area for a portion of its sanitary sewer lines; and 14. In order for Minnetrista to adequately provide for the transportation requirements of anticipated residential development in Minnetrista of lands abutting on the common boundary, and currently refered to as Saunders Lake North (the "Development"), it is necessary and convenient that existing roadways, lying partially in Minnetrista and also including a portion of Westedge Boulevard lying within the corporate limits of Mound (the "Portion") be improved. The improvement includes, without limitation, the realignment of the roadbed, the construction of permanent surface, and curb and gutter all as is shown on the attached Exhibit D (the" Westedge Boulevard South Project"). 15. Minnetrista understands that the need to improve the Portion is largely the result of the Development, and is therefore willing to make certain assurances to Mound regarding the Project. 16. Minnetrista ordinarily requires that developers be responsible for the construction, in Minnetrista, of any necessary public improvements caused by a development. RECITALS NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto do stipulate and agree as follows: JBD-191352v2 MU200-85 I. WATER SERVICE 1.10 Grant of Easement. Minnetrista agrees to deliver to Mound temporary and permanent easements and/or licenses necessary for the construction, maintenance and operation of the Mound water service lines over under and across the Property. The descriptions of the areas of the Property covered will be prepared by Mound and reviewed by the Minnetrista. The dimensions of the easement and/or license areas will conform to standard practices. Minnetrista agrees to deliver such instruments within a reasonable time, but not later than 60 days following the date that Mound furnishes Minnetrista with the proposed legal descriptions. Minnetrista represents to' Mound that it has the full power and authority to grant such easements and/or licenses. 1.20 Interconnection. Mound agrees to design the water line to include an interconnection with the Minnetrista service lines at a location, and utilizing structures that shall be mutually acceptable to the parties as reasonably determined by their respective engineers. 1.30 Proiect Costs and Permits. Mound shall be responsible for 100% of the project costs and for acquiring any and all permits from applicable state agencies. Minnetrista shall cooperate, as necessary in any applications. Mound further agrees that it shall be responsible for 100% of the cost of lowering the water line within the easement area in the event that such lowering is necessary as a result of the design of Westedge Boulevard adjacent to the easement. 1.40 Use of Interconnection. The interconnection shall have a valve which shall be opened only in emergencies. In the event of an emergency in Mound, the valve may be opened to supply water to Mound by Mound employees upon the direction of the City Manager, the Public Works Director or the Police or Fire Chief of the City of Mound. In the event of an emergency in Minnetrista, the valve may be opened by Minnetrista employees at the direction of the City Administrator, the Public Works Director, or the Police or Fire Chief of Minnetrista. The City opening the valve shall make every reasonable effort to notify the other City as soon as possible. The City opening the valve shall be responsible for closing it. If the water is needed for more than 24 continuous hours, it can be supplied only upon the approval of the Mound City Manager and the Minnetrista City Administrator following consultation, if possible, with the Public Works department. 1.50 Charges for Water Usage. The volume of any water used shall be calculated according to the length of time the valve is open and the water pressure flow. Charges for each volume unit of water used will be based on the water rate charged by the City supplying the water. 1.60 Repair and Maintenance. Mound shall be responsible for repair and maintenance of the interconnection, the valve and its lines. Minnetrista shall be responsible for the repair and maintenance of its lines beyond the valve. Mound, except in the case of emergency repair or maintenance, shall give Minnetrista 24-hour advance notice of any repair or maintenance activity. The City performing the repair or maintenance activity shall be responsible for the restoration (and the cost of such) of property or improvements that are disrupted as a result of such activities. JBD-191352v2 MU200-85 II. WESTEDGE BOULEVARD (NORTH) 2.10 Grant of Authority, Design, Minnetrista hereby grants to Mound the authority to enter into the City of Minnetrista for the purpose of constructing the improvements to Westedge Boulevard in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Mound and approved by Minnelrista. The plans shall include all utility lines that are to be constructed by Mound within the right-of-way as part of the project, and shall include, without limitation, the construction of a water service stub to the east lot line of the parcel located at the southwest comer of the intersection of Westedge Boulevard with Lynwood Boulevard (the Waterline Stub"). Mound agrees that it will provide the owner of such lot with a reasonable oppommity for review and comment as to the location of the Waterline Stub. Mound also agrees that in lieu of any other hook-up, connection or area charge, it will charge the owner a flat fee of $1,200 for connection to the Waterline Stub. Promptly upon the execution of this agreement, Mound shall cause to have prepared detailed plans and specifications of the construction of the roadway. Upon completion, such plans and specifications will be presented to Minnetrista for approval. Such approval shall be not be unreasonably withheld, and will be given within a reasonable timeframe, but in no event more than 60 days from the date of submission, unless, during such period, Minnetrista notifies Mound of its disapproval of the proposed plans and specifications. Such notification shall state the reasons for such disapproval, and the steps necessary to correct the plans and specifications. 2.20 Construction, Warranty and Insurance. Once approved, Mound, will let the project. Any contract for construction of the improvements to the portion of Westedge lying in Minnetrista must contain a standard warranty of work that runs to Minnetrista, and must also contain insurance coverages running in favor of Minnetrista of an amount that Minnetrista would require on similar projects. Mound will coordinate with the residents of properties in Minnetrista to keep them informed and updated on construction activities. 2.30 Proiect Costs and Permits. Mound shall be responsible for 100% of the project costs, including any necessary easements, and for acquiring any and all permits from applicable state agencies. Minnetrista shall cooperate, as necessary in any applications. 2.40 Inspections. Mound will be responsible for the construction management of the Project including necessary inspections. Minnetrista shall have the fight to make inspections of the construction at any time. Mound shall provide Minnetrista with a construction timetable at the beginning of the project, and any revisions to said schedule. 2.50 Acceptance Upon Completion. Upon completion in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, and the delivery by Mound to Minnetrista of a complete set of final record plans, Minnetrista shall accept the portion of Westedge Boulevard lying within its corporate limits. Such acceptance shall constitute a full release and satisfaction of Mound's obligations to construct the roadway, except for defects discovered after acceptance by Minnetrista which were not or could not be discovered before acceptance. 2.60 Right of Entry. Mound hereby grants to Minnetrista, its agents and employees the right to enter onto the right of way to Westedge Boulevard lying within the City of Mound for the purpose of constructing the interconnection of the portion of Westedge Boulevard described above JBD-191352v2 MU200-85 with improvements to Westedge Boulevard to be constructed by Minnetrista to the south. It is understood that such improvements are to be made without cost to Mound, and are to be based upon designs prepared by Minnetrista. III. SANITARY SEWER LICENSE. 3.10 License Granted. Subject to the provisions of this agreement, Mound grants to Minnetrista, and Minnetrista hereby accepts a license to construct, operate and maintain sanitary sewer facilities within the License Area. 3.20 Consideration. Consideration for this agreement is the mutual promises and agreements made herein, and also is the full and faithful performance of the mutual promises of the parties contained elsewhere in this Agreement., 3.30 Grant of Authority, Design, By such license, Mound hereby grants to Minnetrista the authority to enter into the License Area for the purpose of constructing the improvements to Minnetrista's sanitary sewer system at locations acceptable to Mound and in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Minnetrista and approved by Mound. Promptly upon determining the need to construct a sanitary sewer line within the License Area, the Minnetrista City Engineer shall cause to have prepared detailed plans and specifications of the construction of the sanitary sewer. Upon completion, such plans and specifications will be presented to the Mound City Engineer for approval. Such approval shall be not be unreasonably withheld, and will be given within 60 days from the date of submission, unless, during such period, Mound notifies Minnetrista of its disapproval of the proposed location, plans and specifications. Such notification shall state the reasons for such disapproval, and the steps necessary to correct the plans and specifications. 3.40 Construction, Warranty and Insurance. Once approved, Minnetrista, may let the project. Any contract for construction of the improvements to the portion of the sanitary sewer lying in the License Area must contain comprehensive public liability insurance coverage running in favor of Grantor of an amount that Mound would require on similar projects. 3.50 Project Costs and Permits. Minnetrista shall be responsible for 100% of the project costs and for acquiring any and all permits from applicable state agencies. Mound shall cooperate, as necessary in any applications. 3.60 Maintenance. Minnetrista shall be exclusively responsible for repair and maintenance of its sanitary sewer lines located within the License Area. Minnetrista shall, except in the case of emergency give the Mound 24-hour advance notice of any repair or maintenance activities. IV. WESTEDGE ROAD EXTENSION (SOUTH} JBD-191352v2 MU200-85 4.10 Development Approval. Minnetrista agrees that it will not give fmal approval to permit the construction of the Development until the developer has entered into a binding agreement with Minnetrista to construct, at no cost to Minnetrista or Mound, that part of Westedge Boulevard South in accordance with the plans and specifications for such construction shown on the attached Exhibit D 4.20 Grant of Authority, Plans. Mound hereby grants to Minnetrista, its agents and employees, the authority to enter into the City of Mound for the purpose of constructing the improvements to Westedge Boulevard South Project in accordance with the plans and specifications contained in Exhibit D. 4.30 Modification of Plans and Specifications. The parties acknowledge that it may be necessary to modify the Plans and Specifications from time to time to address such issues and soil conditions and drainage and tree relocation matters. The agreement contemplated in section 4.10 shall also obligate the developer to the construction costs necessitated by such modifications. 4.40 Construction, Warranty and Insurance Security. As part of the approval process for the Development, Minnetrista, or at Minnetrista's option, the developer will let the project. Any contract for, or which includes, the construction of the improvements of Westedge Boulevard South must contain a standard warranty of work, insurance coverages, and performance security all of an amount or nature that Minnetrista would require on similar projects. Mound shall be designated as an additional beneficiary of all such warranties, coverages and securities. 4.50 Proiect Costs and Permits. In accordance with the provisions of Section 4.10 above, Minnetrista shall obligate the developer of the Development to be responsible for 100% of the project costs, including any necessary easements, and for acquiring any and all permits from applicable state agencies. Minnetrista and Mound shall cooperate, as necessary in any applications, and when appropriate, the applicable city or cities will be the named applicant. 4.60 Inspections. Minnetrista, or at its option, the developer, will be responsible for the construction management of the Project including necessary inspections. Mound shall have the right to make inspections of the construction at any time. Minnetrista, or the developer, shall provide Mound with a construction timetable at the beginning of the project, and any revisions to said schedule. 4.70 Acceptance Upon Completion. Upon completion in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, Mound shall accept Westedge Boulevard South. Such acceptance shall constitute a full release and satisfaction of Minnetrista's, and/or the developer's obligations to construct the roadway, except for defects discovered after acceptance by Mound which were not or could not be discovered before acceptance. V. RIGHT OF ENTRY 5.10 Right of Entry. Effective upon the date hereof, Minnetrista hereby grants to Mound, its agents, employees, contractors and invitees the right to enter upon the Property, for the purpose of making surveys, inspections, investigations, soil borings, drilling, and testing relative to Mound's JBD-191352v2 MU200-85 construction of public improvements on portions of the Property, should such construction be authorized by further agreement of the parties. 5.20 Consideration. In consideration for such right of entry, Mound agrees to: (a) Notify Minnetrista of the date and time that work by Mound on the Property will commence under this Agreement which notice shall be at least five (5) business days prior to doing any work on the Property in order to permit Minnetrista's employees or consultants retained by Minnetrista to be present during the time any work is being done by Mound or its consultants; (b) Provide a copy of all test results, surveys and reports prepared by their employees or consultants evaluating the conditions present on the Property to Owners as soon as reasonably possible following final completion thereof. (c) Dispose of all solid waste generated during the course of Mound's sampling activities and other work on the Property in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations. (d) Do the work in the shortest period time reasonably necessary to complete such activities authorized under this Agreement as Mound, in its sole discretion, shall elect to undertake; (e) Use the Property only for the purposes described herein and not park or store any equipment on the Property, except during the limited periods of time when the work on the Property which is contemplated by this Agreement is actually in progress; (f) Do no unnecessary damage to the Property and restore the Property to substantially the same condition as the condition in which it was found by Mound at the time of Mound's entry upon the Property pursuant to this Agreement. (g) Hold Minnetrista harmless from and indemnify it from any and all claims, damages, judgments or obligations, including the cost of defense of suit, arising out of damage to Property or arising out of injury to anyone incurred or alleged to have been incurred in connection with or as a result of any work done pursuant to this Right of Entry, or as a result of Mound's intentional torts or negligence. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Mound shall not be responsible for the timeliness of any submission or application for further investigation or feasibility analysis of the proper methods of removal, treatment or disposal of any pollutants, contaminants or hazardous substances present on the Property, it being the sole responsibility of Minnetrista to perform these tasks if required; (h) Mound or its contractors or invitees which enter the Property pursuant to this Agreement shall carry insurance during the time any work is done on the Property in accordance with the following minimum requirements; JBD-191352v2 MU200-85 Workers' Compensation Insurance with limits as provided by statute, w/th all necessary statutory elections to provide coverage for and/or claims made by any person doing work on the Property pursuant to this Right of Entry; Employer's liability insurance (often included as coverage) (b) in the Workers' Compensation policy) with limits of $100,000; Comprehensive Auto (and track) Liability Insurance with minimum combined single limits of $1 million per occurrence; 4. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance (including coverage for contractual liability, products and completed operations liability, liabilities arising out of explosion, or underground related incidents) with minimum combined single limits of $1 million per occurrence. (i) If Mound removes a sample or portion of the Property for investigation, monitoring or testing or obtains any data or issues any report, it must give Minnetrista an equal amount of the sample or portion and a copy of any data or report, and must permit the Minnetrista to perform an independent investigation, monitoring, or testing of the sample or portion. 6.10. Goveming Law. the state of Minnesota. VI. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of 6.20. Notices and Demands. All notices, demands or other communications under this Agreement shall be effective only if made in writing and shall be sufficiently given and deemed given when delivered personally or mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, properly addressed as follows: If to Minnetrista: With a copy to: Tom Radio, Esq. Hinshaw & Culbertson Suite 3100 222 So. 9~h Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 JBD-191352v2 MU200-85 If to Mound: With Copy to: Jolm B. Dean, Esq. Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Or to such other persons as the parties may from time to time designate in writing and forward to the other persons entitled to receive notice as provided in this section. 6.30 Indemnification. Mound agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless Minnetrista, its officers agents and employees from any claims or causes of action, of whatever nature, occasioned by or arising out of Mound's activities under this Agreement, including without limitation, construction, repair, maintenance and operation by it of the Local Improvements within Mound. Minnetrista agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless Mound, its officers agents and employees from any claim or cause of action, of whatever nature occasioned by or arising out of Minnetrista's activities under this Agreement including, without limitation, repair, maintenance or operation the Local Improvements located in Minnetrista, and of the interconnection. Such undertakings shall not extend to acts that are the result of the intentional or negligent conduct of the other party, nor shall such undertakings be deemed to waive any limitation of liability available to either party. 6.40. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto only by written instrument executed with the same procedures and formality as were followed in the execution of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and pursuant to authorization of their respective City Councils, the Cities of Minnetrista and Mound have entered into this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF MINNETRISTA CITY OF MOUND Mayor Mayor JBD-191352v2 MU200-85 City Administrator City Manager JBD-191352v2 MU200-85 10 P OLUTION PPROVING A POLICY ON APPOINTMENTS AND REAPPOINT)tENTS TO AD¥ISORY COM)iISSIONS BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby establishes the following policy: Definitions of "Vacancy": A vacancy occurs when a term expires and the commissioner holding that term does not desire reappointment. A vacancy also occurs when a commissioner resigns his/her position prior to the term expiring. When a vacancy occurs, the City Manager is directed to advertise in the City's official newspaper that there are positions to be filled on a commission(s). Such advertising' shall be done in the form of a "news release". Such news release shall include, but not be limited to, the number of vacancies, the length of the term, or request for letter of interest and/or resume, application deadline date, etc. The news release shall also state that prospective ap- plicants will be required to interview with the City Council and respective commission jointly. Such interviews will be conducted as soon as pos- sible following the application deadline. Each commission will formally recommend appointments following the joint interviews. The City Council will review those recommendations and will be responsible for making the appointments. Current commission members who wish to be reap- pointed must indicate such and the reasons for being reappointed in writing a minimum of sixty (60) days prior to their term expiring. e If a member resigns during his/her term, such resignation must be in writing and submitted to the City Manager. In the case of member resigning with less than ninety (90) days remaining on his/her term, the City Council, at its discretion, may delay filling the vacancy until the term officially expires." The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Jessen and-seconded by Councilmember Johnson. NOTICE Revised January 3, 2000 THE MOUND CITY COUNCIL WILL ATTEND THE FOLLOWING MEETINGS IN JANUARY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE INTERVIEWS OF CANDIDATES FOR MOUND ADVISORY BOARDS: Economic Development Commi'ssion Jan 18 7:00 a.m. Docks and Commons Advisory Commission Planning Commission Jan 18 7:30 p.m. Corrected Jan 22 7:30 p.m. Park and Open Space Advisory Commission Jan 11 7:30 p.m. Meetings will be held in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Kandis Hanson City Manager Posted December 22, 2000 Bruce, Jon, Jim, & Jodi- Mayor Meisel has asked that we advertise for all expiring positions on advisory commissions. Please review this advertisement. It must go to the Laker Tues, Dec 19 by 4:30 p.m. Check the content of your respective sections for accuracy of information. Do the timelines work for the acceptance of applications and interviews by your commissions? I know Park & Open Space won't make the agenda packets but the applications could be faxed to commission members on Jan 10. We would run this ad Dec 23, 30, Jan 6. Ail other ads currently running should be canceled. Call Jodi with corrections to the text and me with any input regarding the above. PUBLIC NOTICE CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS FOR CITY OF MOUND ADVISORY COMMISSIONS Revised January 3, 2001 The City of Mound wishes to notify the public of upcoming vacancies on its advisory commissions, and hereby invites qualifying persons to apply. Applications close at 4:30 p.m., January 9, 2001. Appointments will be made by the Mayor and City Council at a subsequent meeting in 2001, following the receipt of recommendations from each respective commission. Economic Development Commission - A three-year term. Meets the third Thursday of each month, at 7:00 a.m. To be considered, candidates must live with the city limits of Mound or own or operate a business within the city limits of Mound. This advisory commission considers a variety of development issues connected to economic and redevelopment, and acts as a recommending body to the City Council. Please call Mound Visions Coordinator Bruce Chamberlain (612-252-7140) for more information, or Jodi at City Hall (472-0601) to apply. Interviews will be January 18 at 7:00 a.m. Docks and Commons Advisory Commission - A three-year term. Meets the third Thursday of each month, at 7:30 p.m. To be considered, candidates must reside in the City of Mound. This advisory commission considers matters pertaining to Mound public docks program and the public commons system of Mound. Please call Jim Fackler (472-0611) for more information, or Jodi at City Hall (472-0601) to apply. Interviews will be January 18 at 7:30 p.m. Corrected. Planning Commission - A three-year term. Meets the second and the fourth Monday of each month at 7:30 p.m. To be considered, candidates must reside in the City of Mound. This advisory commission considers all matters pertaining to planning and zoning, and acts as a recommending body to the City Council. Please call Jon at City Hall (634-7071) for more information, or Jodi at City Hall (42-0601) to apply. Interviews will be January 22 at 7:30 p.m. Park and Open Space Advisory Commission - A three-year term. Meets the second Thursday of each month at 7:30 p.m. To be considered, candidates must reside in the City of Mound. This advisory commission considers all matters pertaining to parks and open spaces, and acts as a recommending body to the City Council. Please call Jim at City Hall (472-0611) for more information, or Jodi at City Hall (472-0601) to apply. Interviews will be January 11 at 7:30 p.m. Kandis Hanson, City Manager MEMO DATE: November 30, 2000 TO: Expiring Board and Commission Members FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Manager Term Expirations are at the end of your term as a board or commission member. In preparation for the City Council Annual Meeting, Mayor Meisel would like to confirm your interest in being reappointed to your volunteer position serving the City. Please indicate below regarding your interest and return this memo to my Assistant, Jodi Rahn, by December 15, 2000. You may fax it to 952-472-0620, or mail it to or drop it at CityHall at 5341 Maywood Road. Feel free to use the drop boxes after hours. Thank you for your willingness to serve over the years! My name: Board/Commission on which I serve: Please consider me for reappointment for another term: Yes No (Circle One, Please) MEMO TO: Mark Goldberg, Dock and Commons Commissioner Tom Casey, Park Commissioner Cklair Hasse, Planning Commissioner Jerry Clapsaddle, Planning Commissioner FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Manager Application for Advisory Commission You have expressed an interest in being reappointed to your advisory commission. As provided by resolution of the City Council of Mound, please submit your completed application for consideration, to be considered along with other applicants. Please return by 12:00 noon, January 9, 2001. They may be faxed to 952-472-0620 or dropped at City Hall. Interviews will take place according to the enclosed schedule. Please feel free to call me with any questions (472-0609). Mound City Code Section 155.00 Section 155 - The Council Section 155:00. Meetings. Subd. 1. Regular Meetln,s. Regular meetings of the Council shall be held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each calendar month at 7:30 P.M. Any regular meeting falling upon a holiday shall be held on the next following business day at the same time and place. All meetings, including special and adjourned meetings, shall be held in the city mn. Subd. 2. Special Meetings. The Mayor or any two members of the Council may call a special meeting of the Council upon at least 24 hours written notice to each member of the Council. This notice shall be delivered personally to each member and shall be left at his/her usual place of residence with some responsible person. Similar notice shall be given to the official newspaper of the City, and a copy shall be posted on the bulletin board at the City Hall. Subd. 3. Initial Meetin-. At the fn'st regular Council meeting in January of each year, the Council shall: (1) (2) (3) (4) Designate the depositories of City funds; Designate the official newspaper; Choose one of the Council members as Acting Mayor, who shall perform the duties of the Mayor during the disability or absence of the Mayor from the City or, in case of a vacancy in the office of Mayor, until a successor has been appointed and qualifies; Appoint such officers and employees and such members of boards, commissions, and committees as may be necessary. Subd. 4. Public Meetings. All Council meetings, including special and adjourned meetings and meetings of Council committees, shall be open to the public. Section 155:05. Presiding Officer. Subd. 1. Who Presides. The Mayor shall preside at all meetings of the Council. In the absence of the Mayor, the Acting Mayor shall preside. In the absence of both, the Clerk shall call the meeting to order and shall preside until the Council members present at the meeting choose one of their number to act temporarily as presiding officer. 8-29-94 557o Mound City Code Section 155:10 Subs. 2. Procedure. The presiding officer shall preserve order, enforce the rules of procedure herein prescribed, and determine without debate, subject to final decision of the Council on appeal, all questions of procedure and order. Except as otherwise provided by statute or by these rules, the proceedings of the Council shall be conducted in accordance with Robert's Rules of Order, Revised. Subd. 3. Appeal Procedure. Any member may appeal to the Council from a ruling of the presiding officer. If the appeal is seconded, the member may speak once solely on the question involved and the presiding officer may explain his/her ruling, but no other Council member shall participate in the discussion. The appeal shall be sustained if it is approved by a majority of the members present exclusive of the presiding officer. Subd. 4. Rights of Presidin, Officer. The presiding officer may make motions, second motions, or speak on any question except that on demand of any Council member he/she shall vacate the chair and designate a Council member to preside temporarily. Section 155:10. Minutes. Subd. 1. Who Keeps. Minutes of each Council Meeting shall be kept by the Clerk or, in his or her absence, by the Deputy Clerk. In the absence of both, the presiding officer shall appoint a secretary pro tern. Ordinances, resolutions, and claims need not be recorded in full in the minutes if they appear in other permanent records of the Clerk and can be accurately identified from the description given in the minutes. Subd. 2. Approval. The minutes of each meeting shall be reduced to typewritten form, shall be signed by the Clerk, and copies thereof shall be delivered to each Council member as soon as practicable after the meeting. At the next regular Council meeting following such delivery, approval of the minutes shall be considered by the Council. The minutes need not be read aloud, but the presiding officer shall call for any additions or corrections. If there is no objection to a proposed addition or correction, it may be made without a vote of the Council. If there is an objection, the Council shall vote upon the addition or correction. If there are no additions or corrections, the minutes shall stand approved. Section 155:15. Order of Business. Subd. 1. Order Established. Each meeting of the Council shall convene at the time and place appointed therefor. Council business shall be conducted in the following order: (1) Call to order 8-29-94 Mound City Code Section 155:20 (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (lO) (11) (12) Roll call Approval of minutes Public hearings Petitions, requests, and communications Ordinances and resolutions Comments and suggestions from citizens present Reports of officers, boards, and committees Unfinished business New business Miscellaneous Adjournment Subd. 2. Varying Order. The order of business may be varied by the presiding officer, but alrpublic hearings shall be held at the time specified in the notice of hearing. Subd. 3. Agenda. The Clerk shall prepare an agenda of business for each regular Council meeting and file a copy in his/her office not later than one day before the meeting. The agenda shall be prepared in accordance with the order of business and copies thereof shall be delivered to each Council member and to the official newspaper of the City as far in advance of the meeting as time for preparation will permit. No item of business shall be considered unless it appears on the agenda for the meeting or is approved for the addition to the agenda by a unanimous vote of the Council members present. Section 155:20. Ouorum and Voting. Subd., 1. Quorum. At all Council meetings a majority of all the Council members elected shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, but a smaller number may adjourn from time to time. Subd., 2. Voting. The votes of the members on any questions may be taken in any manner which signifies the intention of the individual members, and the votes of the members on any abtion taken shall be recorded in the minutes. The vote of each member shall be recorded 'on each appropriation of money, except for payments of judgments, claims, and amounts fixed by statute. If any member is present but does not vote, the minutes, as to his/her name, shall be marked "Present-Not Voting". Subd. 3. Votes Required. A majority vote of all members of the Council shall be necessary for approval of any ordinance unless a larger number is required by statute. Except as otherwise provided by statute, a majority vote of a quorum shall prevail in all other cases. 8-29-94 Mound City Code Section 155:25 Section 155:25. Ordinances, Resolutions, Motions, Petitions and Communications. Subd. 1. Readines. Every ordinance and resolution shall be presented in writing. An ordinance or resolution need not be read in full unless a member of the Council requests such a reading. Subd. 2. Signing and Publication Proof. Every ordinance and resolution passed by the Council shall be signed by the Mayor, attested by the Clerk, and filed by him or her in the ordinance or resolution book. Proof of publication of every ordinance shall be attached and filed with the ordinance. Subd~ 3. Repeals and Amendments. Every ordinance or resolution repealing a previous ordinance or resolution or a section or subdivision thereof shall give the number, if any, and the title of the ordinance or code number of the ordinance or resolution to be repealed in whole or in part. Each ordinance or resolution or part thereof shall set forth in full each amended section or subdivision as it will read with the amendment. Subd. 4. Motions, Petitions. Communications. Every motion shall be stated in full before it is submitted to a vote by the presiding officer and shall be recorded in the minutes. Every petition or other communication addressed to the Council shall be in writing and shall be read in full upon presentation to the Council unless the Council dispenses with the reading. Each petition or other communication shall be recorded in the minutes by title and filed with the minutes in the office of the Clerk. Section 155:30. Suspension or Amendment of Rules. These rules may be suspended only by a two-thirds vote of the members present and voting. Section 155:35. Salaries of Mayor and Council Members. Effective January 2, 1995, the salary of the Mayor shall be $375 per month and the salary of each Council Member shall be $250 per month. (ORD.//70-1994, 8-29-94) Section 155:40. Worker's Compensation. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 176.011, Subdivision 9, Clause 5, the elected officials of the City and Municipal Officers appointed for a regular term of office shall be included in the City's coverage for Worker's Compensation under the Minnesota Worker's Compensation Act. (ORD. #22-1989 - 2-20-89) 8-29-94 Mound City .Code Section 245 - Planning Commission Section 245:00 Section 245:00. Establishment of Commission. A City Planning Commission for the City of Mound is hereby established. The Planning Com~ssion shall have the powers set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462, and as authorized in this Section 245. Section 245:05. Composition. The Planning Co~{ssion shall consist of twelve members. Eight members shall be appointed by the City Council and may be removed by a four- fifths vote of the Council; the Council shall select one member of the Commission from among its own members, the said Council member to be appointed for one year, commencing in January of each year; the City Manager, the City Attorney, and the Building Inspector shall be members of the Commission ex-officio and without vote. Of the terms of the members first appointed, three shall expire January, 1961; three shall expire January, 1963; and two shall expire January, 1962. Their successors shall be appointed for terms of three years. Both the original and successive appointees shall hold their offices until their successors are appointed and qualified. The term of ex-officio members shall correspond with their respective office tenures. Vacancies during the term shall be filled by the Council for the unexpired portion of the term. Every appointed member before entering upon the discharge of his or her duties shall take an oath that he or she will faithfully discharge the duties of his or her office. Ail members shall serve without compensation. Section 245: 10. Or~anization~ Meetings, Etc. The Comaission shall elect a Chairman and a Secretary from among its appointed members for a term of one year; and the Commission may create and fill such other offices as it may determine. The Commission shall hold at least one regular meeting each month. It shall adopt rules for the transaction of business and shall keep a record of its resolutions, transactions, and findings, which record shall be a public record. Section 245:15. Adoption of Pro,ram of Work. Annually the Commission shall prepare a program of work, outlining activities proposed to be undertaken in the exercise of its powers and the performance of its duties. The program shall include: An outline of data and information to be assembled as a basis for the Comprehensive Municipal Plan and for amendments thereto. An outline of subjects to be covered by amendment to the Comprehensive Municipal Plan. An outline of types of procedure necessary to make the adopted Comprehensive Municipal Plan effective. The Planning Commission may revise its program of work from time to time. Section 245:20. Preparation of Comprehensive Municipal Plan. It shall be the function and duty of the Pl~m-ing Commission to update and revise the Comprehensive Mound City Code Sec=ion 245:25 Municipal Plan for the physical development of the City, including proposed public buildings, street arrangemen:s and improvements, public utility services, parks, playgrounds, and other similar developmen:s, the use of property, the density of population, and other matters relating to the physical development of the CiTy. Such plan may be prepared in sections, each of which shall relate to a major subject of the Plan, as ou:lined in the Co~ission's program of work and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. Section 245:25. Commission Approval of Plan. The approval of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan or of any section or amendment thereof shall be by resolution of'the Co-,-~ssion. The Commission may from time to time amend or add to said Plan or any section thereof in themanner provided for the adoption of the original Plan whenever changed conditions or furtherstudies by the Commission indicate that such ~:'2--amendment'~oradditton is necessary. ~ An attested copy of the Plan or of any section, amendment, or addition to the Comprehensive Municipal Plan adopted by the Planning Commission shall be certified to the Council for final adoption by said Council. Section 245:30. Means of Executin~ Plan. Upon the adoption of the Comprehensive Municipal Plan and any amendment thereto, it shall be the duty of the Planning Commission to recommend to the City Council reasonable and practicable means for pu:ting into effect such Plan or sec=ions thereof in order =hat =he same will serve as a pattern and guide for the orderly physical development of the City and as a basis for the efficient .expenditure of the f~mds thereof relating to =he subjects of such City Plan. Such means shall consist of official controls, a plan for traffic regulation, a plan for parking facilities, a plan for future streets, coordination of the normal public improvemen:s of the City, a long term program of capital expenditures, and such other matters as will accomplish the purposes of this Section. Sec=ion 245:35. Zoning Plan. The Planning Commission upon its own mo=ion may, or upon instructions by the City Council shall, prepare proposed official controls for the CITY. Before recommending such plan to the City Council, :he Planning Commission shall hold at leas: one public hearing thereon after a notice of the time end place of which shall be given by publication in the official newspaper in the manner prescribed by Minnesota Statu:es, Chapter 462. Section 245:40. Procedure for Changes. No change shall be made in the zoning ordinance until the proposed change has been referred to the Plmnning Commission for report thereon and a copy of such report has been filed with the Council; failure of the Planning Commission to so report within forty (40) days or such longer period as may be designated by the Council after such references shall be deemed to be approval of the proposed change. Sec:ion 245:45. Capital Improvement Pro,ram. Each officer, department, board or commission of or in the City whose functions include recommending, preparing plans for, or constructing public works shall, at least three months before the end of eac' 't~ound City Code Section 245:50 year, submit to the Planning Commission a list of the proposed public works recommended by such officer, department, board or com=ission for planning, initiation, or construction during the ensuing year. The Planning Co---~ ss ion shall request from the local school district a similar list of its proposed public works. The Planning Commission shall list and classify all such proposed public works for =he ensuing year and shall recommend =hem =o =he City Council. Section 245:50. Capacity of Plannin~ Comm~-~sion as Board of Adjustments and Appeals. The Planning Co-~,ission shall also serve as the City's Board of Adjustments and Appeals. Section 245:55. Duties of Plannins Commission as Board of Adjustments and Appeals. The Commission shall hear and decide appeals from any decision of the Building Official in the enforcement of the zoning and building ordinances and all matters referred to the Commission under the zoning ordinance. The Commission shall not have any authority to make any change or amendment to the zoning ordinance and shall act in a purely advisory ~ner to the City Council,: mak/ng its recommendations in all cases referred to it, and transmitting them to the Council for final action. In general, the Commission shall hear and make-recommendations on the following matters: Permits for temporary non-conforming buildings; such permits to be used for not more than one year. Permits for reasonable variations of lot width, lot area, and set back regulations when the strict enforcement thereof will work unnecessary hardship. Special permits to alter or enlarge non-conforming uses as set forth in the zoning ordinance. e Requests for variance from the literal provisions of the City's zoning regulations in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique =o the individual property under consideration; and to recommend approval of such variances only when it is demonstrated that such action would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the zoning regulations. Section 245:60. Zonin,~ Appeals - Vote Required. A majority vote of four-fifths of the Commission shall be necessary to reverse any decision of an administrative officer of the City or to decide in favor of the applicant. 557/o Mound City Code Section 260:00 Section 260 - Economic O®veloDment Commission Section 260:00. gstablis~ment o~ Comm~ssion~ An Economic Development commission for the City of Mound is hereby estab- lished. The Commission shall be the City's Development Commis- sion and shall hereafter be referred to as "EDC". Section 260:05. ~ The purpose of the EDC will be .to fur- ther the economic development of Mound; to aid, assist and promote the growth, expansion and development of business thereby to contribute to the economic well being of the area as measured by increased employment, payroll, business volume, tax base and corresponding factors. Section 260:10. Composition., The EDC shall consist of seven members'. Sixmembers shall be appointed by the City Council and an~'member may be removed by a four-fifths vote o~ the Council; the Council shall select one member, of the Council to serve .on the Commission from among the Councllmembers, ~he ~ai~ Councll~ member to be appointed for one year, commencing in aanuary or each year~ the City Manager shall be a member of the Commission ex-officio and without vote. On the terms of the members first appointed, two shall expire December 31, 1989; two shall expire qecember 31, 19~0~.a~? ~o shall expire December 31, 1991. Their successors sna£~ ce p- pointed for terms of three year~. Bo~? the o~lglna% and succes- sive appointees shall .hold their office until their successors are appointed and qualIfied unless removed by a four-fifths vote of the City Council. The term of ex officio member shal~ c~r- respond w~th their respective office tenures. Vacancies uur~ng the term shall be filled by the Council for the unexpired portion of the term. Every appointed member before entering upon the discharge of his or her duties shall take an oath that he or she will faithfully discharge the duties of his or her office. Ail members shall serve without compensation, but may be reimbursed for actual expenses if funds therefor are provided in the adopted City budget. (ORD. #36-1989 - 10-30-89) The qualifications of the members of the Commission shall be those who, in the judgment of the Council, are representative of the community and are qualified by training and experience and interest useful for the fulfillment of the Commission's respon- sibility in economic development. Section 260:15. Orqanization, Meetinas, Etc, At the first meet- ing of the year, the Commission shall elect its own Chairperson for a term of one year and each year thereafter. The Commission shall elect at its first meeting a Vice-Chairperson for a term of one year and each year thereafter. The Co~mission may create and fill such other offices as it may determine and create 10-30-89 Mound City Code Section 260:20 subcommittees as it deems necessary to accomplish its purpose. The Commission shall hold at least one regular meeting each month at a time and place as agreed upon by its members. Section 260:20. Commission Staff. The Commission shall receive the staff services of the City Manager or his designee or other personnel as recommended by the City Manager. Section 260:25. Responsibilities. The EDC shall have as its number one priority goal the economic development of the City of Mound. In order to accomplish this goal, the EDC shall advise the City Council on actions it deems appropriate. The Commission shall: a) Promote~the development and use of planned commercial, industriaI~and business sites in the City. b) Provide information to realtors and lending institu- tions serving industrial, commercial or business clients. c) Cooperate with site relocation committees and in- dustrial, commercial or business leaders seeking a location for new or expanded plant facilities. d) Cooperate with civic betterment agencies interested in promoting the potential of the City's labor force and industrial, commercial and business areas. e) Cooperate and coordinate the layout, preparation and distribution of unsolicited industrial, commercial or business information from the City of Mound to prospec- tive commercial, industrial or business clients. f) Review state legislation and local ordinances in order to determine how these regulations impact on local economic development. g) Explore conventional and alternative methods of financ- ing for commercial and industrial development. h) Meet with and explore with local developers and busi- ness persons to learn their concerns and receive their input as to how the economic climate can be improved. i) Meet with elected and appointed state and local offi- cials along with other appropriate resources it deems necessary in order to accomplish its goals. J) Advise the City. Council of new legislation and or- dinances it would like to see adopted and/or amendments to the same which it feels will promote economic 2-20-89 Mound City Code Section 260:25, k) development. From time to time the EDC shall hold a joint meeting with the City Council so as to inform both groups of the others' efforts and to keep open the lines of communication. k) Undertake whatever other tasks the City Council finds it can be helpful with and which will enhance the area's economic development. Section 260:30. Powers. a) The EDC shall have no power to make contracts, levy taxes, borrow money, or condemn property, but shall have the full power and responsibility to investigate the necessity and recommend the taking of these and any ~.~.other actions related to the industrial and commercial - development.by the council and all other officers of the City responsible to formulate the terms of and the procedure for taking such action. b) To confer with and advise the Council and Planning Com- mission on all matters concerning the industrial, busi- ness and commercial development of the City. c) To publicize, with the consent of the Council, the in- dustrial and commercial advantages and opportunities of the City within the City provided by any appropriation made therefor by the Council. d) To collect data and information as to the type of in- dustries and commerce best suited to the City. e) To periodically survey the overall condition of the City from the standpoint of determining whether the City has a community climate for economic development and to determine the general receptiveness of the City to particular types of industry, commerce or business. f) To provide the Council with information as to the general advantages and disadvantages of industrial and commercial development in the community. g) To cooperate with all industries and businesses in the City in the solution of any community problem which they may have and to encourage the expansion, develop- ment and management of such industries and businesses so as to promote the general welfare of the City. h) To cooperate with all community groups and civic or- ganizations within the City and to furnish them with such aid and advice as deemed appropriate. 2-20-89 Mound city Code Section 260=30, i) i) To develop, compile, coordinate and publicize with available funds; information, such as, but not limited to the following: Existing industrial and co~ercial concerns within the City, their addresses, types of businesses, number of employees and whether each serves local, regional or national markets. e Available industrial and commercial sites includ- ing number of acres, approximate price, existing zoning and proximity to major and minor ar~erial roads. Available buildings for industrial and commercial operations, including type of building, number of square feet, existing zoning and proximity to major and minor arterial roads. Transportation facilities, including motor car- riers, air transportation and highway facilities. 5. Electric power available. 6. Funds available for industrial and commercial use. Sewage disposal facilities. 8. Water supply facilities. Community facilities such as fire, police and education. 10. Recreational facilities. 11. Wage rates of unskilled, skilled, semiskilled and white collar workers. 12. Availability of labor. 13. General community attitude toward industrial and commercial expansion, development and attraction. 14. Experience and programs of surrounding suburban communities in regard to industrial and commercial expansion, development and attraction. 15. To recommend to the Council and Planning Commis- sion policies and particular actions in regard to industrial and commercial expansion, development, and attraction. 2-20-89 Mound City Code Section 260=30, i), 16 16. To cooperate with and use the facilities of the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development. (ORD. %23-1989 - 2-20-89) 2-20-89 Mound City Code Section 256:00 Section 256 - Dock and Commons Advisory Commission Section 256:00. Establishment of Commission. The Dock and Commons Advisory Commission for the City of Mound is hereby established. (ORD.//84-1997 - 2/28/97) Section 256:05. Composition. The Dock and Commons Advisory Commission shall consist of six members. Five members (to be composed of three inland and two abutting property owners, all of whom must be active in the City licensed dock program) shall be appointed by the City Council and may be removed by a four-fifths vote; the Council shall select one member of the Council to serve on the Commission from among the Councilmembers, the said Councilmember to be appointed for one year, commencing in January of each year; the City Manager and the Park Director shall be members of the Commission ex-officio and without vote. On the terms of the members fzrst appointed, one shall expire December 31, 1997; two shall expire December 31, 1998; and two shall expire December 31, 1999. Their successors shall be appointed for terms of three years. Initial appointments shall, to the greatest extent possible, be made from the members of the Commons/Dock Task Force. Both the original and successive appointees shall hold their offices until their successors are appointed and qualified. An appointee shall be automatically removed from the Commission upon ceasing to be active in the City licensed dock program. The term of ex-officio members shall correspond with their respective office tenures. Vacancies during the term shall be filled by the Council for the unexpired portion of the term. Every appointed member before entering upon the discharge of his or her duties shall take an oath that he or she will faithfully discharge the duties of his or her office. All members shall serve without compensation buy may be reimbursed for actual expenses if funds therefor are provided in the adopted budget of the Park Department. (ORD. //84-1997 - 2/28/97) Section 256:10. Or~,anization. Meetings, etc. The Commission shall elect a Chairperson from among its appointed members for a term of one year with a limit of two consecutive terms as Chairperson; and the Commission may create and fill such other offices as it may determine. The Commission shall hold at least on regular meeting each month. It shall adopt rules for the transaction of business and shall keep record of its resolutions, transactions, and findings, which record shall be a public record. (ORD.//84-1997 - 2/28/97) 4/1/97 Mound City Code Section 256:15 Section 256:15. Duties. It shall be the duty of the Commission to meet from time to time with the City Manager, the City Council, and the Park Director to consider matters pertaining to docks and shoreline that is subject to City licensed docks in the City as shall be referred to the Commission by the City Council, City Manager, the Park Director, or as members of the Commission deem proper with respect to such matters. The policy of the City of Mound is to strive to: a) provide present and future residents of the City an unpolluted environment; b) provide access to lakes and streams in the community; and c) provide parks which afford natural beauty as well as recreational enjoyment. It is understood that the Commission is advisory to the City Council and is created pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City Council by Minnesota Statutes, Laws of 1987, Section 412.621, Subdivision 1. (ORD. #84-1997- 2/28/97) Section 256:20. Reports to be Advisory. The Commission reports, conclusions and recommendations shall be made to the Council, Manager, and Park Director as may be requested, or to any or all of them as the Commission deems appropriate in the light of the matter under consideration. Its reports, conclusions, and recommendations are purely advisory, and the final determination and responsibility shall be with the Council. It shall be aided and assisted in every way possible by the Park Director, who shall be appointed by the City Manager. (ORD. #84-1997 - 2/28/97) 4/1/97 New Park and Open Space Advisory Commissioners This is intended to be a broad overview of what you can expect as a member oft. he City of Mound's Park and Open Space Commission. If requested, you can be supplied with additional information on any of these or other topics not written here. Crg:~.tiOll ! The creation of our Commission is based on the City of Mound Code Section 255:00. It is under the authority of the City of Mound to establish a Park Commission that is advisory m them. Mound is a "Statutory City, Plan B~ form of government which means that it is made up of a mayor and four council members and a city manager as chief administrative officer. Our City Council is responsible for policy matters and the city manager is responsible for administrative matters. The fact that we are an Optional Plan B city, prohibits us from having an administrative board or commission and allows us to only have an advisory board or commission. Therefor, our decisions, recommendations, or reports are recorded by way of motions in our meeting minutes and are forwarded to the appropriate party. The City Council also keeps advised of our activities by way of our meeting minutes. The Park Commission minutes are induded in the Council's information packet each month. Likewise, the Council minutes are induded in our packets. The Park Commission members are appointed volunteers. Candidates are interviewed by the current Park Commissioners and a recommendation is forwarded to the City Council for approval. There is also one City Council liaison with voting rights and the city staffPark Director, ex-officio and without vote. 12-1-98 Duties The duties section of the Mound City Code is written as follows: Mound City Code Section 255:15 Duties. It shall be the duty of the Commission to meet from time to time with the City Manager, the City Council, and the Park Director to consider matters pertaining to recreation programs, parks end open space (except shoreline that is subject to City licensed docks) in the City as shall be referred to the Commission by the City Council, City Manager, the Park Director, or as members of the Commission deem proper regarding such matters. The public policy of the City of Mound is to strive to: a) provide preSenfand future reSidents of the City an unpolluted environment; b) provide access to lakes end streams In the community: end c) provide parks which afford natural beauty as well as recreational enjoyment. It Is understood that the Commission is advisory to the City Council end Is created pursuant to the authority conferred upon the city council by Minnesota Statues, Laws of 1987, section 412.621, Subdivision 1. (ORD. #84-1997 -2/28/97) About a week before each monthly meeting, you will receive a packet of information mailed or delivered to your home. Read the packet of information compiled by city staff The information in the packet relates to your meeting agenda. You may need to visit the site of an agenda topic to see the issue first hand. If you need any thing tariffed or any additional information call the Park Director, Jim Fackler at 4724011. This packet of information as well as discussion at the meetings, input from the public and your own visions and expectations will be some of your background information for making recommendations to the City Council, City Manager or Park Director. The Park Commission offers researched advise for the policy and direction of the park and open space in Mound. We also research and advise on property acquisition issues and recreaction. Sometimes Mound citizens show up at meetings to express concerns or requests. We have submitted artides to ~e Laker requesting input from citizens in regards to their neighborhood parks. In these cases, the public is allowed to speak at the commission meetings. It is advisable to take their information and seek further information bcfo~'¢ making a final decision. It is our job to assist the residents of the City of Mound wid~ their requests or concerns related to parks, open spaces and recreation activities. Proccdurc$ The Park and Open Space Commission meetings operate under Roberts Rules of Order, as do most meetings. (See the attached quick reference guide.) It is dependent on the Chairman and the size of the Commission as to how complex the parliamentary procedure rules are implemented. Our small size enables us m operate under fairly simple parliamentary procedure~. The Park Commission also has work rules that we write and review each year in order to keep the meetings in order and productive. To conduct business, a quorum must be present. A quorum refers to a majority of the commission members. In the case of the Park and Open Space Commission, a quorum would be achieved with four of our six members in attendance. With a quorum in attendance, the meetings begin with the Chairman asking for approval of the agenda with any changes or additions. When discussing a topic on the agenda, the Chairman notices the person speaking and controls when another person can be heard. After a discussion has been exhausted, a member can make a motion or the chair can ask if anyone is ready to make a motion. The motion can sound something like "I move to .. approve the meeting minutes of January 1.~ It is then required that another member make a secondto the motion. Ifa secondis heard, further discussion can be made to the motion and then it proceeds to a vote. If no secondis heard, the motion diesfbr lack ora secoma~ A new motion could then be entertained. Open Meeting Law The Park and Open Space Commission is bound by the Minnesota Open Meeting Law as are all municipal and other public bodies and any committee, subcommittee, board or department. The City Attorney periodically updates case law and refreshes all the Commissions and Council with things to watch in regards to the Open Meeting laws. A few common standards are outlined as follows. The Open Meeting Law is intended to foster open and honest government. It may seem to be restrictive but the Court noted the need to balance the public's right to be informed against the public's right to effective and efficient administration. All meeting times and dates are publidy noted. Our standard meeting, the second Thursday of each month at 7:30 PM, is automatically noticed by way of the routine City calender. Any gathering of a quorum of Park Commission members at times other than the standard meeting~.time.must be noticed in Mound's official news paper, The Laker or by the City Clerk posting a notice. The type of meeting determines how it needs to be noticed. The Open Meeting Law also requires that all meetings be recorded and minutes taken so that the public can get this information if they request it. The Commission members are subject to enforcement of this law by way of a civil penalty. The City of Mound carries insurance on all of the Commission members. Ifa person intentionally violates the law three times, the violator forfeits the right to serve on that body for the rest of the term. Thanks for your willingness to serve your City of Mound. Citizen involvment makes better government for all of us. Mound City Code Section 255:00 Section 255 - Park and Ooen Space Advisory Commission Section 255:00. Establishment of Commission. City Park and Open Space Advisory Commission for the City of Mound is hereby established. (ORD.//39-1990 - 1-29-90) Section 255:05. Composition. The Park and Open Space Advisory Commission shall consist of six members. Five members shall be appointed by the City Council and may be removed by a four-fifths vote of the Council; The Council shall select one member of the Council to serve on the Commission from among the Councilmembers, the said Councilmember to be appointed for one year, commencing in January of each year; the City Manager and the Park Director shall be members of the Commission ex-officio and without vote. Members shall be appointed for terms of three years. Appointees shall hold their offices until their successors are appointed and qualified. The term of ex-officio members shall correspond with their respective office tenures. Vacancies during the term shall be filled by the Council for the unexpired portion of the term. Every appointed member before entering upon the discharge of his or her duties shall take an oath that he or she will faithfully discharge the duties of his or her office. All members shall serve without compensation but may be reimbursed for actual expenses if funds therefor are provided in the adopted budget of the Park Department. (ORD. #36-1989, 10-30-89) (ORD. #39-1990- 1-29-90)(ORD. #84-1997- 2/28/97) Section 255:10. Organization, Meetings. etc. The Commission shall elect a Chairperson from among its appointed members for a term of one year with a limit of two consecutive terms as Chairperson; and the Commission may create and fill such other offices as it may determine. The Commission shall hold at least one regular meeting each month. It shall adopt rules for the transaction of business and shall keep a record of its resolutions, transactions, and findings, which record shall be a public record. 4-1-97 Mound City Code Section 255:15 Section 255:15. Duties. It shall be the duty of the Commission to meet from time to time with the City Manager, the City Council, and the Park Director to consider matters pertaining to recreation programs, parks and open space (except shoreline that is subject to City licensed docks) in the City as shall be referred to the Commission by the City Council, City Manager, the Park Director, or as members of the Commission deem proper regarding such matters. The public policy of the City of Mound is to strive to: a) provide present and future residents of the City an unpolluted environment; b) ..... provid~ access lo lakes and streams in the community; and c) provide parks which afford natural beauty as well as recreational enjoyment. It is understood that the Commission is advisory to the City Council and is created pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City Council by Minnesota Statutes, Laws of 1987, Section 412.621, Subdivision 1. (ORD. #84-1997 -2/28/97) Section 255:20. Reports to be Advisory. The Commission reports, conclusions, and recommendations shall be made to the Council, Manager, and Park Director as may be requested, or to any or all of them as the Commission deems appropriate in the light of the matter under consideration. Its reports, conclusions, and recommendations are purely advisory, and the final determination and responsibility shall be with the Council. It shall be aided and assisted in every way possible by the Park Director, who shall be appointed by the City Manager. (ORD.//10-1988- 1-26-88) 4-1-97 MOUND CITY CODE SECTION 350:500, SUBD. 5. SUbd. 5. Institute in the name of the appropriate actions or proceedings against a provided for. City, any violator as Subd. 6. Serve as an ex-officio non-voting member of the Planning Commission. Section 350:5~0. &Dmeals and the Board of A4justmen~ and SGbd. 1. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments shall be the City Council. The Planning Commission shall hear and advise the City Council of its findings and determinations. S~bd. 2. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall act upon all questions as they may arise in the administration of this Ordinance, including the interpretation of zoning maps, and it shall hear and decide appeals from and review any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative official charged with enforcing the Ordinance. Such appeal may be taken by any person, firm or corporation aggrieved or by any officer, department, board or bureau of a town, municipality, county or state. S~bd. 3. The conditions for the issuance of a variance are as indicated in Section 350:530 of this Ordinance. No use variances (a use different from that permitted in the district) shall be issued by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Subd. 4. Hearings of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall be held within such time and upon such notice to interested parties as is provided in its adopted rules for the transaction of its business. The Board shall, within a reasonable time, make its order deciding the matter and shall serve a copy of such order upon the appellant or petitioner by mail. Any party may appear at the hearing in person or by agent or attorney. S~bd. 5. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may reverse or affirm wholly or partly or modify the order, requirement, decision, or determination as in its opinion ought to be made in the premises and to that end shall have all the powers of the officer from whom the appeal was taken and may issue or direct the issuance of a permit. The reasons for the Board's decision shall be stated. 36 3/15/93 APPLICANT INFO~TION VOLUNTEER BOARDS/COMMITTEES/COMMISSIONS (Please use black ink or type.) Date: January 8, 2001 Name of Board: Advisory Planning Commissioner Pcrson~]Information: Jerry John Clapsaddle A.I.A N~ne: Address: 2611 Granger Lane Telephone: Home: ( 9.5 2 ) Place of Employment: 472-6293 Work: (952) 844-1381 Nash Finch Company Please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this board/committee/commission. 1. 30 odd years as an architect and planner by trade. 2. 12 years service on present commission e e 8 years service on the Littleton, Colorado planning commision 6 years service on the Evergreen, Colorado committee advisory panel. What skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this board/committee/commission? My professional skills and licenses in 16 states to practice on both sides of the panel for 35 years. With what you know about this area, what do you see as the three most significant issues this board/committee/commission will need to address in the next 2 years? 1. The d0wnt0wn/10st lake development program and related projects. 2. The old school district site as it appears to be moving is a - possitive manner. 3. A city wide understanding and consensus of Mound wants itself to be. of what the City What one or two contributions do you think you would make, in the short term (first few months) and in the long term (after a year)? 1. To take a more indepth role that has not been my option in the past. 2. Become more knowledgeable of the day to day events- within my Home City. That will ultimately help in my service on the commission.- Please fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this board? None ! Note: As of January 19th, I will be starting retirement and it is my hope to become more involved with this process. Please return by 12:00 noon, January 9, 2001 to: City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 -7:30 Date: ame ofl oard: Personal Iaformat~nl: Name: Telephone: Home: q',.~'2 q"~_~/~ Work: APPLICANT INFORMATION VOLUNTEER BO,,~RI)S/COI~'II~S/CO~$SIONS (Please use black ink or type.) Please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this board/committee/commission. o What skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this board/committee/commission? With what you know about this area, what do you see as the three most significant issues this board/committee/commission will need to address in the ne~ 2 years? What one or two contributions do you think you would make, in the short term (first few months) and i~n the long term (after a y~ear)T ~ Please fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this board? Please remm by 4:30 p.m., to: City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 MEMO DATE: January 19, 2001 TO: Mayor Meisel Council Members FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Manager Advisory Board Appointments At their January 18, 2001 meeting, the Mound Economic Development Commission interviewed two candidates to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Lonnie Weber. Those candidates were John Wilsey and Sherrie Pugh. See their enclosed applications. Minutes could not be completed in time for this packet. Members voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council appoint John Wilsey to fill the vacancy of Lonnie Weber. . Council Members present at this meeting: Bob Brown, Kim Anderson and Mayor Pat Meisel. APPLICANT INFORMATION VOLUNTEER BOARDS/COMMITTEES/COMMISSIONS (Please use black ink or type.) Dae: December 26, 2000 NameofBo~d: Economic Developement Pe~on~Informafion: Name: John D. Wilsey Commi s s ion Address: 2900 Halstead Lane Telephone: Home: ( 952) Place of Employrnent: 472-5913 Work: (763) Uhl Company, Inc. 425-7226 Pleasedescfibework, volunteer, orli~ experience ~a youhavehadthm wouldprep~e you ~rbe~ga memberofthisbo~commi2ee/commission. Building construction contractor for 35 years Commercial building owner in Mound for 5 years Home owner in Mound for 25 years Whaskillsandabilitiesdoyouhave ~a wo~dbehelp~lindoing ~e wo~ ofthis bo~Wcommittee/commission? Having been in construction business for years and working with large commercial contractors and developers Wi~ whm you knowabomthis are~ what doyousee ~ ~ethree mostsignificantissues ~isboar~commi~ee/commissionwillneedtoad~essin ~ene~ 2years? Redevelopement of downtown Helping existing connercial owners Bringing in new connerce Whm oneortwocontributio~ doyouthinkyou woMd make, in ~eshon Rrm (first &w monks) and in ~e long term (ffter a yew)? First - listen - observe - learn After - utilize my aforementioned skills Please fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this board? None Please remm by 4:30 p.m., to: City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 APPLICANT INFORMATION VOLUNTEER BOARDS/COMMITTEES/COMMISSIONS (Please use black ink or type.) Date: ~~ c~.~\ Name of Board: ~O_.Ortov~ll (-- '-~' ~'~~lt~--~ ~ Personal Informatio~t Address: Telephone:Home: Place of Employment: Please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this board/committee/commission. What skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this board/committee/commission? . o With what you know about this area, what do you see as the three most significant issues this board/committee/commission will need to address in the next 2 years? ° What one or two contributions do you think you would make, in the short term (first few months) and in the long term (after a year)? Please fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this board? Please return by 4:30 p.m., to: City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAY~VOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 January 18, 2001 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor/City Council ~ Jim Fackler, Park Director (. ~.~,._.,.~ Dock & Commons Advisory Comm'~sion Recommendation for Commission Member Appointment. At the DCAC January 19, 2001 meeting interviews were held for appointment to the committee. (At this time the minutes related to this discussion are not available.) It was determined through a vote that the DCAC would recommend re-appointment of Mark Goldberg to the commission for the two year Abutting Property/User position. cc: Kandis Hanson, City Manager pr~nted on recycled l~aper APPLICANT INFORMATION VOLUNTEER BOARDS/COMMITTEES/COMMISSIONS (Please use black ink or type.) Date: Jan 8, 2001 Name of Bo~d: DCAC Personal Information: Name: Mark Goldberg Address: 4853 Island View Dr, Mound Telephone: Home: 472-4624 Work: 472-2444 Place of Employment: Northern Flair Foods, Inc. 1. Pleasedescribe work, volunleer, orli~ experiencethatyouhavehadrhatwould prep~e you ~rbeinga memberof~isbo~/commi~ee/commission. I have lived on commons for 11 years and have had a boat/ dock in the program for that time. I also have a boathouse on commons. I have been involved with the issue since 1989 and was chairman of the docks taskforce that was the precursor to the DCAC. I worked' on the survey done in the early 90s and have been involved in most of the discussions since then as well as participating in the Woodland Point mediation group in the mid 905. 2. %%atskillsandabilitiesdoyouhav¢ ~ wouldbehelphlindoingtheworkof~is bo~commi~ee/commission? I have a lot of background on the views and priorities of each ef the constituencies. My perspective benefits from that experience. My negetia~ing style tends rewards consensus. and compromise. I try to understand beth sides of the issue and find a solution that recognizes each side's principal concerns. while this is not always acheived, I believe the DCAC has been successful in a number of projects because of the above approach. With what you know about this area,, what do you see as the three most significant issues this board/committee/commission will need to address in the next 2 years? 2. nonabutting dock placements vis a vis abutting proper~yo 3. Commons maintenance. Implicit in all three issues are the priority of striking a balance between the desires of the groups that will keep the polar extremes of each group from dominating. ... ~a oneortwocontribufionsdoyouthinkyou would make, in ~eshonterm (f~m ~w months) and in the long term (after a year)? I believe I can be a strong advocate for abutting property owners in part because of my ability to find common ground among the constituent groups. This will be critical with the abeve 3 issues both short term and long term. Please fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest you ma.',' hav-~ serving on this board? I have a boathouse and dock on cocoons, but I don't believe that to be a conflict of interest. Please return by 12:00 noon, January 9. 2001 to: City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 APPLICANT INFORMATION VOLUNTEER BOARDS/CO~E$1COiVEV[ISSIO NS (PIt, sc use b~;k ink or type.) Address: ~IF/ ~,' v/ ~7 Telephone:Home: 47~-7oq~ Wor~ ~-3'~,5~ Fl~e ~be wor~ vol~e~, or Ufe ~ce ~ you ~vc you fm ~g a m~ of~s ~ McQ~M ~a~ m ~)~o~, ~. l ~ ~y ~ a proj~ m~g~ ~e, ~plem~g ~em~ web s~ f~ Mc~y's ~1~ ~;~. I ~ ~o~ble ~ ~ a ~ l~r ~d tram m~ ~od pl~g ~h, whi~ ~ould ~ ~ ~sa ~ ~e Do~ ~d C~ms Co~si~. ~lmeer, I ~t1~ s.~ ~ ~e PI~ p~b~ ~umh P~e~ l~der ~ ~e Boy S~u~ ~e~. I ~ m ~e ~ s~s md ~i~es do you ~e ~l ~d be hd~ ~ do~g ~e work of ~s boo'co--nee/coal°n? · Comfortable in team leader or le~m member role · Good planning skills · Computer lkcrate · Look to address root cause of issues rather than addressing symptoms With what you know about ~ht~ ar~ what cio 7o~ se~ as th~ three most significant issues this boardJcommitt~Icommission ~ t~,ed m addre~ in the next 2 I dm't l~ow of ~ny 6gnific~nt issues ~t ~ D~k ~d C~s ~ssion ne~s ~ ~ ~ Qe ~o y~, b~ I ~ ~ ~s ~ ~sue re~ ~~t ~ a y~r or ~ a~ ~ ~s n~ well ~~ to ~e ~y ~cll ~ ~e issue. a~ ~Hc~y ~~ ~ su~ ~ c~ ~co~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H~ o~ p~ for ~le. What on~ or two conm'bu~ons do you thi~k you vtOtllCt ~: ill the Short (first few mon-,hs) and in the long tmma (afl~ a year)? In the first, few monks, I expc:t tba: most of my time will bc spent learning r~e ropes and g:~ing m 1mow ~ commission m=mb~s. ~vin~ ~ded a few Docks ~d Commons Commission ~d ci~ council me~ings, I feel fl~g ~esc boar~ ~n be intimid~[ for a citizmn to deal ~ith. I would do my best' w m~c cities feel comfo~able fl~ling wifl~ ~e c~mission. ' ~ ~c long ~, 1 ~v~ld expect mbc in a v:u active role in ~e commission, rese~cl:i~g ~d addressing i~u~s and mcommendation~ for ~c ti? council. Plea~ fully disclose any pot~ntiaI contlic'cs of int~st you may have serving on this boa~l? City Msaag~ City of Mound 53a. 1 Mayw~od Road Mou.ncL, lv[N 55364 1::1')5 · TEL=763 553--50t6 01/11' 01 11:32 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAY~NOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 January 18, 2001 MEMORANDUM To: From: Ref: Mayor/City Council ~,~,~~' Jim Fackler, Park Direct6~_..~l ~/ Recommendation by the Park & ~pen Space Advisory Commission position opening. Dear Mayor and City Council, The POSAC at their January 11, 2001 meeting interviewed for newly established sixth appointed member for the commission. Their recommendation to the City Council is to appoint Mr. Ron Moytka for the position Attached are the draft of the commission minutes related to the recommendation. All applicants were notified that this matter was being addressed at the City Council January 23, 2001 meeting. prmted on recycled paper APPLICANT INFORMATION VOLUNTEER BOARDS/COMMITTEES/COMMISSIONS (Please use black ink or type.) Date: ,o/ ~loo Personal Irfformatj,9,n: Name: Address: Telephone: Home: [5'~a~ tt'~:~ - '~ 5 Place of Employment: ~ e,,.~t~, {' Work: twdk Please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this board/committee/commission. o What skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this board/committee/commission? With what you know about this area, what do you see as the three most significant issues this board/committee/commission will need to address in the next 2 years? What one or two contributions do you think you would make, in the short term (first few months) and in the long term (after a year)? Please fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this board? ~ ~e~,~ ~-,~le,., o~ ~' ~u,,T' elL. Please return by 4:30 p.m., to: City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Date: Name of Board: APPLICANT INFORMATION VOLUNTEER BOARDS/COMMITTEES/COMMISSIONS (Please use black ink or type.) 17 (po Please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this board/committee/commission. What skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this board/committee/commission? With what you know about this area, what do you see as the three most significant issues this boardlcomrnitt~commission will need to address in the next 2 years? What one or two contributions do you th{nk you would make, in the short term (first few months) and in the long term (after a year)? Please fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this board? 4~)/7/~ Please return by 4:30 p.m., to: City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, IVllq 55364 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 January 18, 2001 To: From: Ref: Commission Applicant ~ Jim Fackler, Park Director I v/~/ Recommendation by the Park &l~pen Space Advisory Commission for position openfng. Dear Applicant, The appointment of the new Park & Open Space Advisory Commission member will be heard at the City Council level on January 23, 2001. You are welcome to come to the meeting at Mound City Hall Thursday January 23, 2001 at 7:30pm in the Council Chambers. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 952-472-0611. printed on recycled paper 5. INTERVIEW PARK & OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION CANDIDATES Commissioner Beise stated that Susan Taylor and Derrick Hentz will be replacing Christina Cooper and Peter Meyer's seats on the Park & Open Space Advisory Commission. Chair Beise stated the positions being interviewed tonight are as follows. The re-appointment of Tom Casey's position and the new 6th appointed member. Park Director Fackler explained there is one term that has been completed, and Tom Casey is reapplying for that position, and the new 6t' appointed member. Meyer question if there had been an ordinance change and if City Manager, Kandis Hanson could clarify this information. City Manager Kandis Hanson addressed to the Commissioners that yes there has been .an ,adoption of an ~r.d. inance, t which will nOt be effective until its publication and, will be published in the next Laker and yes it has 'been passed. Chair Beise questioned the rights of interviewing for the position of the new 6th appointed member. City Manager, Kandis Hanson stated the ordinance has been adopted but is not in effect. The advertisement has been completed for this run of interviews, with the candidates that have submitted to this point, will be the natural candidate to be considered. Hanson stated whom ever in appointed would not go into office until after the publication date of January 19, 2001. Commissioner Casey, asked to address some concerns he has in regards to the position he is applying for. Casey stated as he reads the resolutions there is no authority for me to reapply and interview for a jOb I have held for twelve years. Commissioner Casey, stated for the record that the only resolution that have been brought to my attention is resolution 92-136 which has nothing to do with reappointment but just appointments. The other resolution that was brought to my attention is 89-139 which is a 1989 resolution which defines a vacancy and I quote this "A vacancy occurs when a term expires and the commissioner holding the term does not desire a reappointment. I expressed my desire for reappointment prior to the end of the year. I don't think that applies. The vacancy's occur and adversting occurs only under that definition of a vacancy, which again I repeat to say the term expires and I do not desire reappointment. I am interviewing under objection tonight. I think it's not according to the resolution as it was drafted. I also think its against the formal policy that has been going on for the last ten to twelve years, that I am aware of the people who have been on the commission. We need to create some longevity in these boards and right know we have a fairly new board and I think its inappropriate for me to have to do this for those policy reasons and also for the resolutions that are already on the books. Thanks for listening. Chair Beise stated he completely agrees and asked Park Director, Fackler what statute position on that. Park Director Fackler stated he is following the direction that was given by the City Manager. It is a policy, which was adopted in1989. Commissioner Casey asked if City Manager, Hanson could explain in the resolution 89-139 that a vacancy occurs under those circumstances. City Manager Kandis Hanson, answered that under #1 of resolution 89-139 dated October 24, 1989 it states when a vacancies occurs the City Manager is to advertise. #2 decribes how that will take place and that you send a resume or application which we chose an application so the information is uniformed and that interviews will be set. #3 that current commission members who wish to be re- appointed must indicate in writing with in the time frame of the expiring term. At the end of a term there should be advertising done and that you take application and if your expiring member is interested in being re-appointed so you take that application as well. This does not say but implies through this that it is a competitive process. Commissioner Casey asked the definition of vacancy on top of those numbers you have sited says vacancy occurs when a term expires and the commissioner holding that term does not desire reappointment. That's when the vacancy process beings. #3 is a different point in practice since 1989 has been you make your wishes before the end of the term and you are reappointed without going through the vacancy process. City Manager, Hanson stated we do not have a vacancy we have an expiring term and an expiring term is not defined here. Vacancy would be when someone drops off with out completing a term. Commissioner Casey stated his point was proven it's not a vacancy so it does not follow 1 and 2. And stated he did given a written 60 day notice at request to the City Manager. The common practice has been that the City Manager or Staff sends out a notice asking if you are interested in being re-appointed they the person will reply. Casey stated he did reply within the time frame the City Manager had asked. Commissioner Domholt ask City Manager Hanson, then by default, a person on the commission does not come fourth 60 days before his term expires, he has to go through the whole process over again. City Manager, Hanson stated we are not applying any kind of default here. It is an expiring term, which is described in #3, and it's asking that person to submit an application along with other potential candidates. Commissioner Domholt stated he has never heard of such and thing being done and it is completely new. City Manager, Hanson stated this has been on the books for a long time. Commissioner Casey stated there is nothing on the books its been decided to do it now. City Council Representative Meyer stated this resolution has been on the books for four different Mayors. The reasoning behind this is because they wanted to keep politics out of the appointments to the advisory commissions. They did not want to make it so each individual council could pick and choose their own advisory commissioners and that's why I strongly object to this. It's pure politics. Commissioner Domholt asked if all the other commissions are being asked to follow the same procedures. City Manager Hanson answered yes. The rules are applied the same across the board. We have 4 committees. Commissioner Casey stated he has never seen a rule on this one. City Manager Hanson explained the resolution is being applied with every commission. Resolutions or policy might fall through the cracks, but when we are aware they are there, we can't ignore them. We have to adhere to the rules. Chair Beise agreed, and stated he is not questioning that I am just reading this completely different than what you are, but if this is the way you would like it done, this is the way we will do it. But I read this completely different. City Manager, ask Chair Beise how do you see it. Chair Beise stated if a commission member wishes to be re-appointed, they just need to indicate as such and they are re-appointed. I do not see anywhere in the resolution if a commissioner said they want to be re-appointed, needs to re-apply. I don't see the word re-apply in the resolution anywhere. And that's, in affect. What we are asking a commissioner to do is re apply for a position that they already hold. Council Representative Meyer stated you don't want it to be easy to remove an advisory commissioner you what to have the super majority of the four fifth vote which is in the ordinance, not just a simple majority like the new way is now. Its clear under the definition of vacancy, if the commissioner wants to stay on the commission, that the only way he can be taken off is by a four fifths vote from the council or if he decides to resign himself. Commissioner Domholt stated the first sentence, "A vacancy occurs when a term expires and the commissioner holding that term does no desire reappointment." Why is the second half even on that sentence. It's irrelevant weather he wants to or not is a vacancy. City Manager Hanson stated she could see where this could be argued. Commissioner Casey stated he is interviewing under protest. Chair Beise asked Commissioner Casey to step down through the interview process. There was some confusion to the written application of Mr. Casey. A separate envelope was delivered to the commissioners with Mr. Casey written application. It was not included in the packet. Commissioner Casey asked who had received the envelope, to make sure this was a fair process. Council Representative Meyer stated he was appointed to be council representative to the Park and Open Space Advisory Commission Tuesday January 9th and a Park Packet was not available, and picked one up the evening of January 10th and briefly got a chance to look at it. Commissioner Casey requested that if you have not had a chance to review my application, I believe you should have a chance to read my application. I would request you table this appointment process until the next meeting. Commissioner Domholt stated he is a volunteer and have put two years in and this is becoming a very frustrating process. I am an intelligent guy and very busy but I take this time out of my life and my kids to be on this advisory to try to do some good for Mound. And this room is filled with tension fighting about giving recommendations about parks, trees and flowers and playground equipment and we are fighting about something that I don't understand we are not getting anything done. I am willing to work hard to get done what the council wants us to get done for are parks, but have never heard a word from anyone. Please let us know what you want. Mayor, Pat Meisel stated we are here tonight with the idea that we were going to be listing to interviews. Council Member Bob Brown stated we all took time off tonight to come sit and listen to the other people and everyone concerned being interviewed so it would be a fair interview. Sue Pilling, 3005 Brighton Blvd. stated she is new to Mound but feels there is some issue with the language in the resolution and felt it should be reviewed before anything else be done and said she is impartial but the process and the procedure and stated that all volunteers be treated with respect, with time you give to the community. Chair Beise stated we have applications for the seat that is open now and need to follow the current guidelines we have, but the guidelines need to be defined and changed. Would like to make a recommendation based on what these applicants applied for. They applied with the current guideline. With two of us having not read Mr. Casey application, recess until 8:20 p.m. to give time to read his application. Commissioner Casey requested a motion from the Park Commission on their interpretation on the set of resolution that indicates that I do not have to reapply in an open appointment process as being requested by the City Council. Chair Beise stated that is ground that has already been covered and is on the record that most of us agree with you on your point and have decided that we are going to move ahead with it as it is tonight. Commissioner Casey again requested a motion to formalize the decision. Chair Beise stated he is not certain a motion is necessary, it is already a matter of record. Chair Beise recessed at 8:05 p.m. Chair Beise reopened the meeting at 8:20 p.m. Motion made by Domholt that council looks at the definition of vacancy and If they can word that more clearly to alleviate any misunderstanding on when A vacancy occurs and defines reappointment when that occurs and application when someone is applying and when someone desires re- appointment and is they're a difference. To clarify the first paragraph of resolution #89-139. Seconded by Hentz. Commissioner Casey stated the vacancy is very well defined. It lays out two steps for vacancy. It does distinguish between vacancy and re-appointment process and has been practice since 1989. I went through an interview process, a very competitive one in 1989. How many more times do I have to do it. I can understand if you have a open vacancy when there is a seat to fill were you have to have a competitive process but I have already been through one. I don't think there is any vagueness there. I agree we want some resolution of this issue, but I don't believe there is any vagueness about it. 'CounCil Representative Peter Meyer state~l to go along with the issue," I think this is a way to by pass the process." I don't think we should be able to remove a sitting commissioner when he wants to be re-appointed just by a simple majority. There is a reason why we have that four fifth vote. We need four out of the five member of the city council to vote to remove of a advisory commissioner. Its very clear in the resolution now, but the perception is this council wants it easier to remove expired term commissioners. It shouldn't be that easy. There is a reason for trying to keep the politics out of this process. Commissioner Casey state he opposes that motion but does agree with the sprit of that it is frustration here and we need to get something resolved. Chair Beise agreed that this resolution is quite clear and were not following it, in my opinion, if we do this. Commissioner Domholt removed his motion. Motion made by City Council Representative Peter Meyer that no matter how The verbiage falls out on this that when an advisory commission members term expires that the only way he can be removed will be if there is a four fifth vote on the council. The advisory committee member would go through the new process but when the vote comes to the city council level there would need to be a super majority vote in order to remove the seating member who's term is expired when he does not want to resign. Seconded by Casey for discussion but motion made for cause in the four fifth vote. Chair Beise stated that we as a commission work hard at the pleasure of the council for the citizens of this town to the best of our belief. Based on resolution passed by the council and previous council we have not received any direction for this council as to a change in the resolution of 89-139 and as such without changing that resolution and council not being is session we will be interviewing our two candidates tonight for the one position that has been approved by the council. We will not be interviewing Tom Casey tonight. In my opinion his reapplication does not follow the resolution. And we get direction from the council as such we will move forward to the applicants we have in house for the position the council has advised us for. Motion made by Meyer with the new standard application interview process which is in effect now, filling out the question for applicants which Tom did if applying for a open seat, or your term has expired and going through the process. Chair Beise stated according to this resolution 89-139 he is not required to re-apply. Commissioner Casey stated for the record that he applied under protest so I am not admitting that this process is valid at all. Chair Beise stated that if the council would like to change this resolution, it is entirely up to them and we will adhere to their new wishes. But my understanding is we have to follow the policy in front of us and the policy in front of us does not require anybody to reapply. City Council Representative ,Peter Meyer, motion withdrawn. Chair Beise stated that at this time we will move on with our application process and apologized to the applicants for taking so long. At this time I would like to asked the other applicant to step out during this interviewing process. Ron Motyka, 1545 Bluebird Lane, addressed the commission that he has been a resident of Mound since 1989. Council Member Brown stated he would also like Tom Casey to step out because he could be a candidate. Chair Beise explained what we are interviewing here is the additional commissioner. Will move forward Council Member Brown answered I think it's a curtsy and point of order that Commissioner Casey be removed. Commissioner Cased stated we as the commission can decide if it is a point of order that we need to except or not. Park Director, Jim Fackler reminded the commission that we need to stay with the application as far as the questions are concerned and be consistent in the questions to all applicants. City Manager Hanson stated that the only questions you can ask are the ones on the application blank. Ron Motyka at this time explained again that he has been here since 1989 and by being part of this community and at times being against this community I need to come fourth with my feeling and the feeling of others in what is going on I the parks and the city itself. I feel a good place for me to start is by starting in the Parks Commission if I can fill the seat here. Chair Beise asked Mr. Motyka please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of the board/committee/commission. Mr. Motyka answered he has spent 33 years working at my current job and prior to that I was a Boy Scout volunteer and have dealt with a lot of kids and church activities and feel I understand what they want to do with there recreation time. Council Representative Meyer asked what skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work on this Park Commission board. Mr. Motyka answered he could point out areas where he could or the Park Commission or Park Commissioner my be lacking in a job where I think things have to be done I am saying there big things or small things like the three points park setting with a ballfield that is useless and no one is using and can't see why some fathers can't get together in the evenings and put down chalk lines and repair broken benches. Commissioner Domholt asked with what you know about this area, what do you see as the three most significant issues this board and commission will need to address in the next 2 years. Mr. Motyka answered fix what you got don't go after what you don't have. Commissioner Casey asked if he could expand on what you mean by don't go after what you don't have. Mr. Motyka answered one thing is Haddorff field. It does not belong to the city, it belongs to the school board at this point. We can't maintain the parks we have why take on that big park and run it into the ground also. That's what I mean by don't take on what's not areas. Commissioners Casey asked if Mr. Motyka had any suggestions for maintenance and improvements for the parks. Mr. Motyka answered let's get some of our parents who are concerned about what the kids are playing in. If the city can't come up with the funds for drawn down chalk lines maybe we can go visit the Elk's or the Moose to come up with money for chalk. Commissioner Casey asked if Mr. Motyka has connections with the Elk's or Moose or other places that you think might be easily mobilized. Mr. Motyka answered that not at this point I don't but I am willing to go knock on doors. Chair Beise asked what one or two contributions do you think you would make, in the short term (first few months) and in the long term (after a year) Mr. Motyka answered in the short term I would have to learn the process and how to make thing work and after a year I hope to get parent, kids or scout troops to get involved. I don't feel that all the maintenance of the parks have to be done by the city. I feel the community can do a lot. I feel we could raise money in the community to do things for are parks. Commissioner Domholt stated he was happy to hear about his feeling about what contributions he would make in the short term. Chair Beise asked please disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this board. Mr. Motyka answered right now I am a resident of this city strictly as a visual community. My work is away from the city and state at times. I work in contract operations so I can't see how anything that would happen here would profit me in anyway. Michael Schoephoerster, 2550 Lakewood Lane. Chair Beise asked please describe work, volunteer, of life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this board or this commission. Mr. Schoephoerster answered he has lived in Mound for twelve years and have a family and decided it time to do something for my city and my neighbors time I feel I do my share. I volunteer and help with the daycare my children attend and with playground equipment. Chair Beise asked what skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this commission. Mr. Schoephoerster answered I am willing to look into a lot of things for example I was here last November applying for two vacant seats and at that time there was a possibility of a new member being added. At that time a lifeguard came up and made some request, which she thought would add to the beach. Mentioned storage area and drinking fountain and bathroom. I am willing to put my time in and do research on what every I can. Commissioner Domholt asked with what you know about this area, what do you see as the three most significant issues this committee will need to address in the next 2 years. Mr. Schoephoerster answered I see the redevelopment being so many apartments built Some rules and guidelines as to what parks should be mandated for dwelling units. Once the layout has been determined it would be the responsibility of this community to advise how the parks should be laid out. With the railroad being vacated there is a chance of getting some trails through town and I feel that would be a plus for Mound. I see maintaining the parks we already have is something being overlooked. Commissioner Domholt asked what one or two contribution do you think you would make, in the short term (first few months) and in the long term (after a year) Mr. Schoephoerster answered he is willing to donate his time and energy. I see maintaining the parks we have and upgrading the facilities is important. We have the responsible to make sure the parks are safe for everyone. Commissioner Casey asked if any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this board, Mr. Schoephoerster answered I work for the power company and they have a franchise with the city to deliver power but I don't see that being a conflict of interest. Chair Beise asked the commissioners if they had anymore question they would like to address to the applicants. Chair Beise thanked the applicants and stated deliberations would be done at the end of the meeting. At this time voting for new candidates Park Director, Faclder explained how the voting ballot is to be used and handed them out to the commissioners. Park Director, Fackler announced the recommendation of the new Park and Open Space Advisory Commissioner would be Ron Motyka MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THI: MOUND ADVISORY PARK AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION JANUARY 11,200'! Present were: Commissioners John Beise, Tom Casey, Derrick Hentz and Norman Domholt and City Council Representative Peter Meyer. Also present was Park Director Jim Fackler, Secretary Jodi Rahn, Ron Motyka, Shelly DeWitt Zimmersched, Kristin Perry, Michael Schoephoerster and Sue Pilling. Absent: Commissioner Susan Taylor. Chair Beise called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. 1. APPROVAL OF THE DECEMBER 14, 2000 POSC MINUTES Motion made by Casey, seconded by Meyer, to approve the minutes of the December 14, 2000 Park and Open Space Commission (POSAC) meeting, as presented. Motion carried unanimously. 2. AGENDA CHANGES The agenda was approved as presented with the following amendments: 1. Add item # 9.a: February agenda. 3. WELCOME THE NEW COMMISSION MEMBERS Commissioner Beise stated that Susan Taylor was not in attendance but welcomed Derrick Hentz to the Park and Open Space Advisory Commission. 4. DISCUSS: ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR 2001 Commissioner Casey nominated Commissioner Beise for the position of Chair. Council Representative Peter Meyer nominated Norm Domholt for Vice Chair. Motion made by Casey, seconded by Domholt, appointing John Beise for Chair for 2001. Motion carried unanimously. Motion made by Meyer, seconded by Beise to appointing Norm Domholt for Vice Chair for 2001. Motion carried unanimously. Mound Advisory Park and Open Space Commission DRAF nu 5. INTERVIEW PARK & OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION CANDIDATES Commissioner Beise stated that Susan Taylor and Derrick Hentz will be replacing Christina Cooper and Peter Meyer's seats, respectively, on the Park & Open Space Advisory Commission. Chair Beise stated the positions being interviewed tonight are as follows: The re-appointment of Tom Casey's position and the new 6th appointed member. Park-Director Fackler explained there is one term that has been completed, and Tom Casey is reapplying for that position, and the new 6th appointed member. Meyer question if there had been an ordinar~ce change and if City Manager Kandis Hanson could clarify this information. City Manager Kandis Hanson addressed to the Commissioners that yes there has been an adoption of an ordinance, which will not be effective until its publication'in the next Laker. Chair Beise questioned the rights of interviewing for the position of the new 6th appointed member. City Manager Kandis Hanson stated the ordinance has been adopted but is not in effect. The advertisement has been completed for this run of interviews, with the candidates that have submitted to this point, being the natural candidates to be considered. Hanson stated whom ever is appointed would not go into office until after the publication date of January 19, 2001. Commissioner Casey, asked to address some concerns he had in regards to the position he was applying for. Casey stated as he reads the resolution there is no cause for him to reapply and interview for a job he held for twelve years. Commissioner Casey stated for the record: The only resolution that has been brought to my attention is resolution 92-136 which has nothing to do with reappointment but just appointments. The other resolution that was brought to my attention is 89-139 which is a 1989 resolution which defines a vacancy and I quote this "A vacancy occurs when a term expires and the commissioner holding the term does not desire a reappointment. I expressed my desire for reappointment prior to the end of the year. I don't think that applies. The vacancy's occur and adversting occurs only under that definition of a vacancy, which again I repeat to say the term expires and I do not desire reappointment. I am interviewing under objection tonight. I think it's not according to the resOlution as it was drafted. I also think it's against the formal policy that has been going on for the last ten to twelve years, that I am aware of the people who have been on the commission. We need to create some longevity in these boards and right know we have a fairly new board and I think its inappropriate for me to have to do this for those policy reasons and also for the resolutions that are already on the books. Thanks for listening. Chair Beise stated he completely agrees and asked Park Director Fackler what statute position on that. Park Director Fackler stated he is following the direction that was given by the City Manager. It is a policy, which was adopted in1989. Commissioner Casey asked if City Manager, Hanson could explain in the resolution 89-139 that a vacancy occurs under those circumstances. City Manager Kandis Hanson, answered that under #1 of resolution 89-139 dated October 24, 1989 it states when a vacancy occurs the City Manager is to advertise. #2 decribes how that will take place and that you send a resume or application which we chose an application, so the information is uniform and that interviews will be set. #3 that current commission members who wish to be re- appointed must indicate in writing with in the time frame of the expiring term. At the end of a term there should be advertising done and that you take application and if your expiring member is interested in being re-appointed so you take that application as well. This does not say but implies through this that it is a competitive process. Commissioner Casey asked the definition of vacancy on top of those numbers you have sited says vacancy occurs when a term expires and the commissioner holding that term does not desire reappointment. That's when the vacancy process beings. #3 is a different point in practice since 1989 has been you make your wishes before the end of the term and you are reappointed without going through the vacancy process. City Manager, Hanson stated we do not have a vacancy we have an expiring term and an expiring term is not defined here. Vacancy would be when someone drops off with out completing a term. Commissioner Casey stated his point was proven it's not a vacancy so it does not follow 1 and 2. And stated he did given a written 60 day notice at request to the City Manager. The common practice has been that the City Manager or Staff sends out a notice asking if you are interested in being re-appointed they the person will reply. Casey stated he did reply within the time frame the City Manager had asked. Commissioner Domholt ask City Manager Hanson, then by default, a person on the commission does not come fourth 60 days before his term expires, he has to go through the whole process over again. Mound Advisory Park and Open Space Commission January 11,2001 City Manager, Hanson stated we are not applying any kind of default here. It is an expiring term, which is described in #3, and it's asking that person to submit an application along with other potential candidates. Commissioner Domholt stated he has never heard of such and thing being done and it is completely new. City Manager Hanson stated this has been on the books for a long time. Commissioner Casey stated there is nothing on the books; it's been decided to do it now. ,City Council ReP[esentative Meyer stated this resolution has been on the books for four different Mayors. The reasoning behinci this is because they wanted to keep politics out of the appointments to the advisory commissions. They did not want to make it so each individual council could pick and choose their own advisory commissioners and that's why he strongly object to this; being pure politics. Commissioner Domholt asked if all the other commissions are being asked to follow the same procedures. City Manager Hanson answered yes. The rules are applied the same across the board. We have four commissions. Commissioner Casey stated he has never seen a rule on this one. City Manager Hanson explained the resolution is being applied with every commission. Resolutions or policy might fall through the cracks, but when we are aware they are there, we can't ignore them. We have to adhere to the rules. Chair Beise agreed, and if this is the way you would like it done, this is the way we will do it, but I read this completely different. City Manager, ask Chair Beise how do you see it. Chair Beise stated if a commission member wishes to be re-appointed, they just need to indicate as such and they are re-appointed. He did not see anywhere in the resolution if a commissioner said they want to be re-appointed, needs to re-apply. He did not see the word re-apply in the resolution anywhere. And that, in affect is what commissioners are being asked to do. 4 Mound Advisory Park and Open Space oo issionDJ AfiT January 11, 2001 Council Representative Meyer stated it shouldn't be easy to remove an advisory commissioner. You want to have a super majority or four fifth vote which is in the ordinance, not just a simple majority like the new way is now. It's clear under the definition of vacancy, if the commissioner wants to stay on the commission, that the only way he can be taken off is by a four fifths vote from the council or if he decides to resign himself. Commissioner Domholt stated the first sentence, "A vacancy occurs when a term expires and the commissioner holding that term does not desire reappointment." He questioned the second half on that sentence it being irrelevant whether he wants to or not. City Manager Hanson stated she could see where this could be argued. Commissioner Domholt expressed his frustration of being on the commission and this process, and his willingness to work hard for the Council to get done, if the Commission could get clear direction from the City Council. Chair Beise stated having a recess until 8:20 p.m. to give time to read Mr. Casey's application. Commissioner Casey requested a motion from the Park Commission on their interpretation on the set of resolution that indicates he did not have to reapply in an open appointment process as being requested by the City Council. Chair Beise stated that is ground that has already been covered and is on the record that most of us agree with you on your point and have decided that we are going to move ahead with it as it is tonight. Commissioner Casey again requested a motion to formalize the decision. Chair Beise stated he is not certain a motion is necessary, it's already being a matter of record. Chair Beise recessed at 8:05 p.m. Chair Beise reopened the meeting at 8:20 p.m. Motion made by Domholt that council looks at the definition of vacancy and If they can word that more clearly to alleviate any misunderstanding on when A vacancy occurs and defines reappointment when that occurs and application when someone is applying and when someone desires re- appointment and is they're a difference. To clarify the first paragraph of resolution #89-139. Seconded by Hentz. 5 Commissioner Casey stated the vacancy is very well defined. It lays out two steps for vacancy. It does distinguish between vacancy and re-appointment process and has been practice since 1989. Council Representative Peter Meyer stated he doesn't think we we should be able to remove a sitting commissioner when he wants to be re-appointed just by a simple majority. Commissioner Domholt removed his motion. Motion made by City Council Representative Peter Meyer that no matter how the verbiage falls out on this that when an advisory commission members term expires the only way he can be removed is if there is a four fifth vote on the council. The advisory committee member would go through the new process but when the vote comes to the city council level there would need to be a super majority vote in order to remove the seating member who's term is expired when he does not want to resign. Seconded by Casey for discussion but motion made "for cause" in the four fifth vote. Chair Beise stated that we as a commission work hard at the pleasure of the council for the citizens of this town to the best of our belief. Based on resolution passed by the council and previous council we have not received any direction for this council as to a change in the resolution of 89-139 and as such without changing that resolution and council not being is session we will be interviewing our two candidates tonight for the one position that has been approved by the council. We will not be interviewing Tom Casey tonight because doing so does not follow the resolution. As directed by the council, applicants present will be interviewed. Motion made by Meyer with the new standard application interview process which is in effect now, filling out the question for applicants which Tom did if applying for a open seat, or your term has expired and going through the process. City Council Representative ,Peter Meyer, motion withdrawn. The following candidates were interviewed. Ron Motyka, 1545 Bluebird Lane. 6 Mound Advisory Park and Open Space Commission DRAFT January 11,2001 Ron Motyka at this time explained again that he has been here since 1989 and by being part of this community and at times being against this community I need to come fourth with my feeling and the feeling of others in what is going on I the parks and the city itself. I feel a good place for me to start is by starting in the Parks Commission if I can fill the seat here. Chair Beise asked Mr. Motyka please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of the board/committee/commission. Mr. Motyka answered he has spent 33 years working at my current job and prior to that I was a Boy Scout volunteer and have dealt with a lot of kids and church activities and feel I understand what they want to do with there recreation time. Council Representative Meyer asked what skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work on this Park Commission board. Mr. Motyka answered he could point out areas where he could or the Park Commission or Park Commissioner my be lacking in a job where I think things have to be done I am saying there big things or small things like the three points park setting with a ballfield that is useless and no one is using and can't see why some fathers can't get together in the evenings and put down chalk lines and repair broken benches. Commissioner Domholt asked with what you know about this area, what do you see as the three most significant issues this board and commission will need to address in the next 2 years. Mr. Motyka answered fix what you got don't go after what you don't have. Commissioner Casey asked if he could expand on what you mean by don't go after what you don't have. Mr. Motyka answered one thing is Haddorff field. It does not belong to the city, it belongs to the school board at this point. We can't maintain the parks we have why take on that big park and run it into the ground also. That's what I mean by don't take on what's not areas. Commissioners Casey asked if Mr. Motyka had any suggestions for maintenance and improvements for the parks. Mr. Motyka answered let's get some of our parents who are concerned about what the kids are playing in. If the city can't come up with the funds for drawn down chalk lines maybe we can go visit the Elk's or the Moose to come up with money for chalk. 7 Mound Advisory Park and Open Space Commission DRAFT January 11,2001 Commissioner Casey asked if Mr. Motyka has connections with the Elk's or Moose or other places that you think might be easily mobilized. Mr. Motyka answered that not at this point I don't but I am willing to go knock on doors. Chair Beise asked what one or two contributions do you think you would make, in the short term (first few months) and in the long term (after a year) Mr. Motyka answered in the short term I would have to learn the process and how to make thing work and after a year I hope to get parent, kids or scout troops to get involved. I don't feel that all the maintenance of the parks have to be done by the city. I feel the · i'..:,;, :community can do a lot. I feel we could raise money in the community to do things for are parks. Commissioner Domholt stated he was happy to hear about his feeling about what contributions he would make in the short term. Chair Beise asked please disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this board. Mr. Motyka answered right now I am a resident of this city strictly as a visual community. My work is away from the city and state at times. I work in contract operations so I can't see how anything that would happen here would profit me in anyway. Michael Schoephoerster, 2550 Lakewood Lane. Chair Beise asked please describe work, volunteer, of life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this board or this commission. Mr. Schoephoerster answered he has lived in Mound for twelve years and have a family and decided it time to do something for my city and my neighbors time I feel ldo mY share. I volunteer and help with the daycare my children attend and with playground equipment. Chair Beise asked what skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this commission. Mr. Schoephoerster answered I am willing to look into a lot of things for example I was here last November applying for two vacant seats and at that time there was a possibility of a new member being added. At that time a lifeguard came up and made some request, which she thought would add to the beach. Mentioned storage area and drinking fountain and bathroom. I am willing to put my time in and do research on what every I can. Mound Advisory Park and Open Space Commission I AFT January 11,2001 Commissioner Domholt asked with what you know about this area, what do you see as the three most significant issues this committee will need to address in the next 2 years. Mr. Schoephoerster answered I see the redevelopment being so many apartments built Some rules and guidelines as to what parks should be mandated for dwelling units. Once the layout has been determined it would be the responsibility of this community to advise how the parks should be laid out. With the railroad being vacated there is a chance of getting some trails through town and I feel that would be a plus for Mound. I see maintaining the parks we already have is something being overlooked. Commissioner Domholt asked what one or two contribution do you think you would make, in the short term (first few months) and in the long term (after a year) Mr. Schoephoerster answered he is willing to donate his time and energy. I see maintaining the parks we have and upgrading the facilities is important. We have the responsible to make sure the parks are safe for everyone. Commissioner Casey asked if any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this board, Mr. Schoephoerster answered I work for the power company and they have a franchise with the city to deliver power but I don't see that being a conflict of interest. Chair Beise asked the commissioners if they had anymore question they would like to address to the applicants. Chair Beise thanked the applicants and stated deliberations would be done at the end of the meeting. Members voted for new candidates. Park Director Fackler announced the recommendation of the new Park and Open Space Advisory Commissioner would be Ron Motyka. 6. DISCUSS: SWENSON PARK PLAY STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT FOR 2001 Park direction Jim Fackler showed a diagram of a play structure and stated that in the 2001 budget we have 30,000.00 that can be expend towards a play structure at Swenson Park and explain some back ground and ideas the city has for the play structure. The main thing is set a plan on how this will be approached and can we do this with 30,000.00. Fackler stated we would be able to do the main structure and the surrounding area but not the complete plan shown in the diagram. Jim explained the safety zone and each area as 9 Mound Advisory Park and Open Space Commission you install must maintain a certain distance between each structure. Fackler asked for input on what type of construction metal or wood and the color of structure the neighbors would want. It must be accessible by wheel chair and meet all the rules and regulation. Chair Beise asked what kind of time do we have and will this be installed this season. Park Director Fackler said he will get two or three quotes from reliable companies and staff will do the installation. Sue Pillinq, 3005 Brighton Blvd. I would like the §tructure to be a natural color and metal over wood. Shelly DeWitt Zimmersched, 4864 Mon ,mouth Road I would like the structure to be a lighter color because of the fact there is not a lot of shade it the park. Would also like to see the metal and plastic structure. I talked with a lot of kids in the neighborhood and the big thing they would like to see is swings. Kristin Perry, 4746 Richmond Road Stated she runs a license daycare center. I would not like the clover climber or the twister climber both are very dangerous. Would like to see both of those replaced with a fire pole. Would like to see the metal and plastic. Consensus of the Advisory Commission was as follows: Would like the structure to made out of steel, plastic and be light in color. Get as much landscaped done earlier and large enough to put in swings Park Director, Fackler stated inspection on the structure will be done weekly. Would like to see the neighbor watch for vandalism. Longevity of the structure is 10 to 15 years. Kristen Perry stated she would like to see another stairway and more benches put in. 7. DISCUSS: CRITERIA FOR NAMING OF PARKS Commissioner Domholt stated on page 22 under "Contributor" should read as follows: Contributor - This can be an individual of organization who has contributed financially to acquisition and/or development of the Park and Recreation system. In succeeding Criteria certain percentages are defined. In addition, an individual who has served the city may be honored by naming a facility after him/her. The Commission recommends that recognition shall not be considered until 10 years after termination of service. 10 Mound Advisory Park and Open Space Commission Dt AFT January 11,2001 Page 23 first line under "A Famous American" should read as follows: The Commission recommends that recognition shall not be considered until 5 years after termination of service. Some examples of possible names would be: Motion made by Meyer, seconded by Casey to extend the meeting up to an hour. Motion carried unanimously. Page 26 fourth line under "Memorials" should read as follows: A portion of future maintenance can be considered as part of the installation cost. 8_ REVIEW: ' PARK & OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION WORK RULES No discussion 9. REVIEW: 2001 AGENDA CALENDER No discussion 10. Some 11. 12. POSAC FEBRUARY AGENDA items for the February POSAC agenda are: 1. Capital Outlay Requests 2. Depot Report for 2000 3. Swenson Park Report 4. Youth Advisory Commission 5. NeighbodCommunity Involvement 6. Skate Park DECEMBER CALENDAR FOR YOUR INFORMATION 2. 3. 4. 5. City Council Minutes December 19, 2000 Special City Council Meeting December 19, 2000 Joint Planning Commission & City Council Minutes Dec. 27, 2000 Dock and Commons Advisory Commission Minutes Dec. 21, 2000 Planning commission Minutes December 11, 2000 11 Mound Advisory Park and Open Space Commission January 11, 2001 Information from City Manager, Kandis Hanson Park Dedication 10. REPORTS: City Council Representative None P.M. b. Park Director None Motion made by Domholt, seconded by Beise, to adjourn the meeting at 10:17 Motion carried unanimously. 12 Hennepin County An Equal Opportunity Employer January 15, 2001 NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF WEED INSPECTOR Enclosed is a form for the appoinUnent of a weed inspector in your municipality. It is required that the enclosed form be filled out and returned to the County Agricultural Inspector. Please do this as soon as possible. We would like all appointments in by April 20, 2001. Sincerely, Enclosure Department of Environmental Services 417 North Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-1397 (612) 348-6509 FAX:(612) 348-8532 Environmental Info Line:(612) 348-6500 Recycled Paper t MINNF__~OTA DEPARTlV~NT OF AGRICULTURE NOTICE OF APPO~ OF ASSISTANT WEED INSPF.,C-~OR INSTRUCTIONS 1) Complet~ this form. 2) Remm to the Count3, Agricultural Insl~'tdr:. Gr~g Senst 417 North 5th Street Minneapolis, MN 554O1 ~n~ o~ ~nso~ ~n~-~ A~O~ LOCAT~O~ 9 2- 472-o0 / I IN~ICA~ UNT~ SUCH A ~ A~ TI~ M~tYOR OR TOWN ~OARD WI~I-I~ TO TERMINATE THE APPO~. ~ AI~POIN'I'ldi~T COlq'lu~ ON ~ AIq~OIN'I'EE ALI. TI~ DUTIES, AUTI. IORITY, AND I~tlV1LEGES OF ANY ~ ~ INSPI~TOR A.q OUTI..INI~ ~ I~W. $1~-'NATI/RI~ (MAYOR OR CRAIR OF TOWNSI-II~ BOARD) ~ DATE 3a~ 05 2001 17;27;04 9ia Fax Page FRIDAYFAX A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota C¢ties Number 1 January 5. 2001 State of the state On Thursday, the governor addressed a joint session of the Legislature to offer his vision of the state of the state. Although he released additional information on the Big Plan, the details were still sketchy. As you might expect, the plan has some good, some bad, and a lot of questions. The legislative reaction to the plan is also mixed. The governor will propose a state takeover of the general education school levy, which will cost the state an additional $800 million per year. He would like to make the property tax "locally decided, locally controlled, and locally accountable" and "avoid" levy limits. Part of the governor's /coal control and accountability" include an elimination of HACA and could include significant reforms to LGA In other words, city taxes would automatically increase by S200 million per year. The governor is proposing an elimination of the sales tax on local government purchases. The sales tax exemption has been a League priority for the past several years. The local government exemption may be more important than ever because the governor will also propose extending the sales tax to many services, including profes- sional services. Many cities have stressed that their consumption of professional services would mean that the cost of the sales tax could increase dramatically Although the sales tax broadening would be coupled with a rate reduction to 6 percent, communities Ihat currently have local sales tax authority could experience a sales tax windfall. But don't expect legis- lators to let that happen automati- cally; the sales tax base expansion has been met with a very cool legislative reception. The governor will likely propose another round of automobile license tab fee reductions. He mentioned reducing the rate to no more than $75. However, he did not identify how or if he would replace the revenue lost by the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund-- revenue that currently funds high- way maintenance and expansion. Gov Venture is also proposing additional cuts in income taxes and corporate income taxes. Given the recent softness in the national economy, several policymakers are questioning whether the entire Big Plan will be sustainable. The February budget forecast will likely be the deciding factor and the Legislature will be the ultimate arbiter. Telecom restructuring The League recommends cities pay careful attention to proposals to overhaul state telecom policy. Some local phone companies are approaching cities. At this time, we suggest cities not adopt such resolutions. Premature action could hamper a final outcome that ensures communities and consumers, particu- larly in rural parts of the state, have more choices and access to state- of-the-ad telecom services. The LMC has not yet analyzed legislation that would restructure telecom regulation in Minnesota. To date, no bills have been introduced containing proposals put forward by the Venture Administration or by associations representing the telephone industry. Cities want policy and regulatory changes that ensure affordable access to state-of-the art telecom- munications and local authority to provide such services as sole operators or in partnership with other providers. It is critically impor- tant that there be increased invest- men~ in advanced infrastructure and services in high-cost areas. The state must set goals for providing these services and allocate re- sources to achieve those outcomes. Wine with dinner Adoptmg a "consumer conve- nience' sales pitch, the Minnesota Grocers Association has launched a comcerted effort to convince the Legislature to authorize grocery stores within the seven-county metropolitan area to sell wine Minn- esota law currently allows grocery store-_- tc only sell 3.2 beer The Grocers' Association has created a web site (w'w~c.wlnewlthdlnner. net) and has placed information in the checkout lanes of metro-area grocery stores. Several interested parties, including the League, have voiced strong reservations. Possi- bly the most notable concern is that an expansion of the venues where alcohol is available might increase the ability of underage persons to obtain these products Any concerns with repeal of obsolete law? Rep Dan McEIroy (R-Burnsville)is considering introducing legislation that would repeal M S.624 65: a law that dates back to 1923 and prohibits itinerant carnivals Rep. McEIroy wants to ensure the repeal would not result in any unintended consequences for cities If you have any concerns, please contact Andrea Stearns, LMC, at (651) 281-1258 or stearns~lmnc.org. For more information on ciO' legislative issues, contact any member of tke League of Minnesota (651) 281-1200 or (800) 925-1122 C~ti£s Inrrrg_overnmenta] Relations l£am, Jau 12 2881 18:16:38 Via Fax -> Adainistrator Page 881 Of 882 FRIDAYFAX A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities Number 2. January 12, 2001 House Ways and Means hears note of economic caution On Friday, the House Ways and Means Committee heard testimony from State Economist Tom Stinson about the recently-released state tors to wait for the official February forecast. Bill Introductions Beer keg Identification H.E 58, a bipartisan effort to implement requirements for beer keg identification, was introduced economic update. In that report ..... . state revenue co eot °nS'f0L'" ,~i '- ~) ,? :by Representatives Mary Jo .... McGuire (DFL-Falcon Heights), November were below forecast Connie Bernardy (DFL-Fridley), estimates. Given recent concerns about the slowing national economy, legislators were interested in the report and whether the economic update is a predictor of a slowing state economy. In late November, the governor and the Legislature were presented with another forecast with a multi- billion state budget surplus. At that time, Finance Commissioner Para Wheelock stopped shod of warning legislators and the media that the state's economic forecast firm was relying on some of the most optimis- tic projections of economic growth. Ultimately, the question for legisla- tors and the governor is whether the projected $3 billion state budget surplus for the upcoming 30 months will be revised downward in the February forecast. In two weeks, the governor will unveil his budget and tax reform recommendations. It is widely believed that his entire package, including tax cuts and rebates, will be based on what may now be optimistic November forecast figures. Although the figures in the economic update appear to add concern to the forecast, Stinson stressed that he does not want to make long-term predictions based on monthly state revenue receipts. He urging legisla- Steve Dehler (R-St. Joseph), and Matt Entenza (DFL-St. Paul) and was referred to the Commerce Committee. The proposed legisla- tion would require off-sale retailers to engrave or attach the prescribed identification to any beer kegs sold. Retailers would also be required to record information at the time of sale, including the purchaser's name, address, and driver's license or social security number, the date and time of purchase, and the keg identification number. The bill makes it a violation for a person required to record keg identification information to knowingly enter materially false information in the book or register. The legislation also includes an additional deposit requirement refundable subject to the keg's return with the identifica- tion intact. Curbing use of TIF Two bills were introduced in the Senate yesterday to significantly limit the use of tax increment financing (TIF). S.F. 65, introduced by Sen. John Marly (DFL-Roseville), would prohibit the certification of new and modification of existing TIF districts after May 31, 2001. The bill would also repeal the tax abatement law and restrict the other business subsidies. S.F. 73, introduced by Sen. Ann Rest (DFL- New Hope) and supported by the Metropolitan Inter-County Associa- tion, would prohibit the modification of TIF plans after April 30, 2001, and limit the use of increments from districts for which the request for certification was made prior to May 1, 1990. After April 30, 2001, increments may be spent on activities authorized in the TIF plan only if one of the following occurs by April 30, 2002: (1) payment is made to a third party; (2) bonds are issued and sold to a third party; (3) binding contracts with a third party are entered; or (4) costs are paid and the revenues are spent to reimburse a party for payment of those costs. Any remaining TIF revenues could only be spent to pay certain outstanding bonds and contractual obligations and credit enhanced bonds and then the district must be decertified. Mayors address affordable housing crisis Mayors from cities as diverse as New Hope, Plymouth, Rosemount, Minneapolis, Ramsay, and Woodbury appeared before the Senate Jobs, Housing & Community Development Committee Friday morning to tell lawmakers cities are ready to take the lead in address- ing the challenge of providing housing affordable to working families and those on fixed incomes. They called on the Legislature to look at the problem as one of the most complex social, economic, and moral problems the state faces, and urged major investmen' in resources for housing productio,, and the development of incentives to involve the business community. For more information on ci~.' legislatire issues, contact any member of the league of Minnesota Cities Intergovernmental Relations teatn, (65]) 28]-]200 or (800) Jan 1Z Z881 1B:I?:Z5 Via Fax -> AamJnJstrator ?age 88Z 0£ 08Z FRIDAYFAX 12, 2001 -- P~e 2 The mayors also said the Legisla- ture cannot expect and must not insist that cities rely solely on the local property tax to spur housing solutions. Minneapolis Mayor Sharon Sayles- Belton and Lakeville Mayor Duane Zaun headed up a mayors' task force on affordable housing.for the MetroPolitan Council. A total bf 16 mayors convened last spring to determine what changes are needed to achieve housing goals and to develop recommendations to achieve those aims. Mayors at today's hearing included Mayor $ayles-Belton, New Hope Mayor Peter Enck, Plymouth Mayor Joy ~erne% Ramsay Mayor Tom Gamec, Rosemount Mayor Cathy and Woodbury Mayor /Villiam Hargiss. The task force also issued these recommendations: · Make local officials "ambassa- dors' for affordable housing and ensure that such housing is provided just as jobs, schools and parks are provided; · Revise state law to make it easier for cities to rezone land and eliminate supermajority requirements for zoning; · Encourage cities to review, waive, or change local develop- ment practices and policies that add to the cost of housing; · Endorse the Housing Minnesota Campaign created by the Minne- sota Housing Partnership (the League has already done so.); · Back cities that ensure local planning and zoning enables development or redevelopment of affordable housing; · Encourage cities to develop strategies for building affordable housing and to work together to raise the visibility and support for affordable housing locally; · Encourage businesses, churches, and other faith-based organizations to become more actively involved in supporting development and management of such housing and in reaching out to residents to address concerns. Upcoming committee hearings Next week, Senate and House committees will continue to hold general departmental overviews in order to educate new members. Hearings of interest include: · House Regulated Industries Committee to hear about energy issues from Dept. of Commerce. Jan. 17--12'30 p.m. 107 Capitol · House Local & Metropolitan Gov:t Committee will hold informational hearing to learn about different local government organizations, including the League Jan. 17--12:30 p.m. 200 State Office Building · Joint House Crime Prevention/ Judiciary Finance meeting to discuss Criminal Justice Informa- tion Policy Group and CrilVlNet. Jan. 18--10.'15 a.m. Basement hearing room/ State Office Building LEAGUE 0 F ,V, I N N ES OTA Legislativ CITIES 200t 0nference February 1, 2001 Sheraton Midway Hotel, St. Paul City officials get the big story on the Big Plan and more City life under"W'; reflections of veteran Capitol repor[er are highlights of conference Registration fee: S70 for members; S20 for youth. H owto register: Register online anytime at www.lmnc.org (online registrations will be billed). Questions? Call Jodie Tooley (GS1) 281-1251 or Cathy Dovidio (651) 28to1250. Page 1 of 3 KandisHanson From: "Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn.us> To: <kandishanson@msn.com>; Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 12:43 PM Subject: westonka.news Vol. 1, No. 13 westonka, news Vol. 1, No. 13 January 12, 2001 The Westonka Public Schools' channel for direct electronic communication to interested parents, staff, and community members, providing up-to-date information about education District 277. 'v~estonka.news publishes weekly. Look for it in your mailbox on Fridays. Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A, Mound MN 55364; http://www.westonka.k12.mn.us; tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043; e-mail: welisten@westonka.k12.mn.us. Contents 1. News Briefs --MWHS Adopt-a-Pillar Project --Update on Sale of 5600 Lynwood Boulevard --Mound Marketplace: What's in the Works? 2. Focus Topic: Improved Financial Management Noted by State Official 3. Upcoming Events 4. We Want to Hear from You NEWS BRIEFS **MWHS Adopt-a-Pillar Project** A new "Adopt-a-Pillar" project will beautify the halls of Mound Westonka High School and offer visual reminders of academic excellence, student leadership, and wide-ranging extracurricular opportunities. In announcing the project, the Mound Westonka High School Mural Committee noted that 100 pillars in the hallways and cafeteria of the building are available for adornment. On a first- come, first-served basis, departments and student clubs or sports teams may apply to paint a pillar with a design of their choosing-as long as it relates to the educational experience in some way and is approved by the Mural Committee. The Mural Committee is composed of 01/12/2001 Page 2 of 3 staff, parents, and students who meet about every two weeks to promote projects that beautify the school environment. For more information, contact assistant principal Marty Fischer at 952.491.8102. <fischerm@weston ka. k 12 .mn. us> **Update on Sale of 5600 Lynwood Boulevard* The December 29 closing on the district-owned property at the corner of Lynwood and Commerce Boulevards did not take place as scheduled. The developer's applications for a preliminary plat approval and conditional use permit remain under consideration by the Mound City Council, which has scheduled hearings for January 23 on those topics. The developer, MetroPlains, is requesting the approvals for a combination commercial/residential/park land development. Closing has been rescheduled for January 26. **Mound Marketplace: What's in the Works?** The Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative is hosting a meeting at which representatives from MetroPlains will describe their plans for the "Mound Marketplace" development to be built on the corner of Lynwood and Commerce Boulevards. Since the Collaborative's efforts are focused on building stronger communities, members are interested in learning how the proposed project will benefit the Westonka community. The Collaborative has opened the meeting up to Key Communicators (those of you receiving this newsletter) who might wish to attend. Friday, January 19, 7:30 a.m., Mound City Hall. **Please RSVP by Thursday, January 18, to Collaborative coordinator Leah Weycker at 952.491.8058 or <weyckerl@westonka.k12.mn.us> FOCUS TOPIC **Improved Financial Management Noted by State Official** Dr. Charles A. Speiker, of the financial management and accountability office, Minnesota Department of Children, Families and Learning, recently called Superintendent Pam Myers with congratulations on Westonka's "tremendous progress" toward getting out of statutory operating debt. Speiker had reviewed financial data from 1999 through projected data for FY2001, and sent the following message regarding Westonka's progress toward getting out of the red: 01/12/200 l~Di~5~ Page 3 of 3 "What a wonderful holiday present to the taxpayers at Westonka: sound academic progress of students; quality improvement in fiscal health; a highly competent leader at the helm. I hope your Board recognizes the mountain that you have climbed." Supt. Myers notes that much credit for the progress is due to School Board members who have insisted on a balanced budget, and to administrators, teachers, and staff who have carefully monitored expenditures so that the district will have a zero fund balance by the end of FY2002. UPCOMING EVENTS --January 13, 10 a.m., Verne Gagne Wrestling Invitational, Mound Westonka High School --January 15, No School, Dr. Martin Luther King Holiday --January 16, Grade 8 Parent Night, 7 p.m., Mound VVestonka High School --January 17, Financial Aid Night, 7 p.m., Mound Westonka High School --January 19, Peace, Respect, and Diversity Fair, 10 a.m., Shirley Hills Primary WE WANT TO HEAR FROM YOU! We would like to hear your feedback on any of the topics above, or any other school-related issue. Use whichever way works best for you: send an e-mail message to <welisten@westonka.k12.mn.us>; call the District Feedback Line at 952.491.8260; or mail your comments to Barbara Olson, Community Relations Coordinator, Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Blvd., Suite A, Mound MN 55364 To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to Barbara Olson at <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn.us> It is the mission of the Westonka Public School District, in partnership with students, parents, and the community, to create the environment necessary to achieve quality education for lifelong learning. Westonka Public Schools 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A Mound MN 55364 tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043 welisten@weston ka. kl 2. mn. us http ://www.weston ka. kl 2. mn. us westonka.news is published by the Community Relations Department, Barbara Olson, editor. 01/12/2001 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, January 10, 2001 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Babcock · "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet Dinner, 2/1/01 @ Lord Fletchers of the Lake READING OF MINUTES- 12/13/00 LMCD Regular Board Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent Agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. City of Minnetonka Beach, Consideration of a new multiple dock application to reconflgure a non-conforming facility under LMCD Code Section 2.015. 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration 1. LAKE USE & RECREATION A) Staff update on Sheriff's Water Patrol Proposal for the 2001 Boating Season (handout); B) (*) Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol Significant Activity Report; C) Ordinance Amendment, First reading of an ordinance relating to intoxicating liquor licenses; amending LMCD Code Section 5.03 by adding new Subd. 4; D) Discussion on proposed updates to the policy on priorities for issuance of on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses; E) Additional Business; 2. WATER STRUCTURES 3. FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (12/16/00- 12/31/00) and (1/1/01 - 1/15/01); B) November financial summary and balance sheet; C) Additional Business; EWMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE A) (*) Minutes from the 1218100,,EWMIExotics Task Force. Meeting;:, ~,:.. :.~.. ~.:..!,...; ,:.: .'.~.. · B) Discussion of Proposal to conduct Lake Minnetonka Milfoil Weevil Survey's and Augmentation Studies; c) (*) Consideration of the sale of the 1986 Chevrolet Suburban used in conjunction with the EWM Harvesting Program, with staff recommending the Board ratify the sale to Central Auto, Inc. on 12/19/00 in the amount of $525.00; D) Additional Business; Se SAVE THE LAKE A) Consideration of one-time funding for recruitment of Special Deputies for the 2001 Boating Season; B) Additional Business; e ADMINISTRATION A) Discussion of recommendations from the Nominating Committee for 2001 LMCD Board Officers; B) Additional Business; 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. ADJOURNMENT DRAFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING 7:00 PM, Wednesday, December 13, 21)00 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Vice Chair Foster called the meeting to order at 7:12 p.m. ROLL ~AI..'L ; I~I~ ' ..... -.~r--.~ Members present: Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Gene Partyka, Minnetdsta; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Andrea Ahrens, Mound; Craig Eggers, Victoria; Lili McMillan, Minnetonka; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members Absent: Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Kent Dahlen, Minnetonka Beach; Tom Gilman, Excelsior; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Sheldon Wed, Greenwood. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Vice Chair Foster There were no Chair announcements. READING OF MINUTES- 11115/00 LMCD Regular Board Meeting MOTION: Nelson moved, Partyka seconded to approve the minutes of the 11/15/00 Regular Board meeting as submitted. Van Hercke stated in the first sentence of the second bullet point under agenda item lA on page 2, the words "Minnesota Court of Appeals" should be deleted and the words "District Court" should be substituted. She recommended this as a friendly amendment. Nelson and Padyka agreed. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENTS- Persons in attendance, subjects not on the agenda. Mr. Judd Mowry, Tonka Bay City Council member, provided an update on deicing installation licenses within the city. A deicing license has been approved for Tonka Bay Marina; however, a license has not been approved for either Curly's Minnetonka Marina or Mr. Mike Osmonson because they had concerns about fencing and weakened ice at these sites. Further action by the Tonka Bay City Council is planned at the next meeting on these two facilities. Nybeck stated that District staff was aware of the deficiencies at these two sites and that corrective steps were being taken to address them. District staff would keep the City of Tonka Bay informed on the status of these two sites. Babcock arrived at 7:20 p.m. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 13, 2000 Page2 PUBLIC HEARING ! - · City of Deephaven, Consideration of new multiple dock license application for a neW structure to correct beach erosion and to clarify licensed BSU's on the south-end of the beach. ' .... ' ...... . .' ": .i: ~ ? ~i:, Babcock opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. He asked the applicant and public if they had any comments. Mr. Jerry Laughlin, a Deephaven City Council member, spoke on behalf of the applicant. He made the following comments: · Beach erosion has been a problem for the City of Deephaven since approximately the 1970's. A rock jetty was established back then; however, it affected water flow in the area moving sand from the south to the north. Improvements were made ir, the area in the early 1990's, including the removal of the rock jetty and sand that eroded. The sand has continued to erode and they have been permitted to remove this sand by the MCWD. The City of Deephaven has proposed the new structure to correct beach erosion in this area on a more permanent basis. · Docking concerns were brought to the City of Deephaven's attention during the 2000 boating season with the Walden Tract X and Y propedies to the south. The parties met with District staff and agreed that the three parties would work on an as-built plan for docking; however, this has not been resolved yet. · He encouraged the Board to approve the beach erosion control structure and to continue further discussion of the boat storage issues, to a future meting, to allow the padies to work out the details. · He entertained comments or questions from the Board. asked Laughlin if he believed there would be any significant changes to the proposed plans provided by the He questioned whether the applicant if they would like the District to keep the public hearing open to a future applicant. meeting. Laughlin stated that the area in the vicinity of the rock jetty needs to be removed for water depth purposes, especially in Iow-water conditions. He encouraged the Board to approve the beach erosion structure as submitted. He believed that the public hearing should be left open for the docking issues at a future Board meeting. Babcock explained to the Board why the beach erosion structure is before the Board for consideration. The permanent structure in the lake falls within the jurisdiction of the Dist~'ict; however, the removal of the sand would fall within the jurisdiction of the MCWD. It would be procedurally difficult for the District to approve the beach erosion control structure when the docking aspect of the application still is open for public comments at a future meeting. MOTION: Foster moved, McMillan seconded to continue the public headng for the City of Deephaven new multiple dock license to the 1/24/01 Regular Board meeting. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously, WATER STRUCTURES ~ A. City of Mound, Discussion of fees incurred by the LMCD in the administration'and proceSsing of six variance applications and a new multiple dock license application. '~ The Board discussed a memo prepared by staff that highlighted fees received and estimated expenses incurred by the District in the administration and processing of six vadance applications and a new multiple dock license application for the City of Mound. Staff indicated that the expenses incurred by the District include estimated Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 13, 2000 Page3 legal expenses, for the District's special counsel George Hoff, to complete the final details of the modifications'' of the Settlement Agreement. The consensus of the Board was to move this agenda item to a future meeting ~ until the project is complete, including estimated legal expenses. ..: B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 2. LAKE USE & RECREATION A. Staff update on Shedffs Water Proposal for the 2001 Boating Season. ;' '~': Foster Updated the Board Oh"progress with the member cities on the Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol Proposal for the 2001 Boating season. There are currently nine member cities that have committed to the proposal for 2001, resulting in a commitment of $16,434.49. Meetings are planned in January with the city council's at Shorewood and Spring Park. Support from all 14 member cities for the 2001 proposal is a goal that he has set. Babcock stated that a basic misconception from the member cities is that the proposal is off-setting the base responsibility of the Hennepin County Shedffs Office Water Patrol for public safety on Lake Minnetonka. The focus of the proposal is to address quality of experience issues on Lake Uinnetonka, with the Distdct and the member cities being the driving force behind the proposal. If the member cities want to participate in the proposal but are concerned with off-setting the base responsibility of the Water Patrol, they should make that a condition of their financial participation. Foster stated that the majodty of the member cities that have not committed to the proposal are looking for documentation and data. This is difficult in this case and that discussion should focus on anecdotal information about efforts of the Water Patrol, such as the reduction in BWI's in recent years. Van Heroke stated that the Minnetonka City Council is looking for additional information on District activities, including this proposal, and that a Workshop/Planning Session is planned for Tuesday, 1/16/01. The current position of the city council is that the proposal should be funded by Hennepin County. Ahrens stated that the position of the Mound City Council is that enforcement on Lake Minnetonka is the responsibility of Hennepin County, not the member cities. The presence of Water Patrol Deputies on the lake has been reduced in recent years because of the time involved in processing BWI's. Babcock reminded the Board that the proposal is for quality of experience issues, not public safety, and that the added presence by the Water Patrol on the lake would improve the quality of the experience. McMillan reminded the Board that the Water Patrol is responsible for all bodies of water in.Hennepin County, not just Lake Minnetonka. The focus of the proposal is.to make the commitment for law enforcement service beyond what is currently being proVided. Foster stated that the proposal is a two-year demonstration on Lake Minnetonka, with a 50% contribution of the local bodies, including the District and the member cities, and a 50% matching contribution from Hennepin County. If the proposal is effective, he believed that Hennepin County should fund all 100% of the proposal beyond the first two years. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting r 13, 2000 Page 4 The ~hsenSuS' of the Boar~j'waS to further update this proposal at future Board meetings. B. Staff update on the issuance of intoxicating liquor licenses for the 2001 Boating Season. Babcock stated that staff is looking for Board direction on two points relating to the issuance of intoxicating liquor licenses for the 2001 boating season. First, should there be a firm date of February 1 for cutoff of renewal applications for that boating season. Second, what system should be used if any of the intoxicating liquor licenses from the prior year do not renew by the due date, whether it be a lottery or first come, first served. He recalled length discussion regarding these two points and that the Board wanted a firm February 1 date for renewal intoxicating liquor' license applications and that the lottery system would be used if any liquor licenses become available. He entertained comments or feedback from the Board on these points. Ahrens left the meeting at 8:20 p.m. The Board discussed a number of issues relating to the issuance of intoxicating liquor licenses for charter boats on Lake Minnetonka, including: · The pro's and con's of a lottery system versus a first come, first serve basis. · Whether priority should be given to charier boats that currently have beer and wine licenses. · Whether priority should be given to existing charter boats or businesses, or if it should be available to the general public. · The need to estai~lish a deadline for renewal of intoxicating liquor licenses, the need to establish a system if intoxicating licenses become available, and whether there is a need to approach the state legislature to increase the number of intoxicating liquor licenses the District can issue to charier boats. If there is an increase in the number of intoxicating liquor licenses the District can issue, should this be one reason to increase law enforcement on the lake. · Whether those parties interested in being placed on a list for a lottery of available intoxicating liquor licenses should require an application or a letter stating their interest in writing, either on a seasonal or permanent basis. · Whether there is a need to make changes Io LMCD Code and the policy relating to the issuance of intoxicating liquor licenses. · The need to notify the intoxicating liquor licensees of the firm renewal date of February 1 and the need to notify other parties interested in participating in the lottery eligibility list of a firm date of February 1. The winner of the lottery on February 2, in rank order, needs to submit completed applications, including fees, within 30 days after the lottery date. The Board directed LeFevere to prepare updates to the policy and LMCD Code relating to the issuance of intoxicating liquor licenses consistent with Board discussion. The Board also directed staff to inform the intoxicating liquor licensees of the renewal deadline of February 1 and to inform other padies of the need to express, in writing, their interest in padicipating on the lottery to take place on February 2. Babcock asked for comments or feedback from the public on the agenda item. Mr. Terry Juengers, president of the Lake Minnetonka Charier Boat Association and owner of Lady of the Lake, overviewed a few issues that the Association would like the District to consider. These included the incorporation of changes in the policy to provide priority for well-established charier boat companies that currently have beer and wine licenses, whether there is a need to increase law enforcement if the number of Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 13, 2000 Page 5 intoxicating liquor licenses the District can issue is increased from 14, and a fair and equal distribution of intoxicating liquor licenses that might become available. He expressed concern about the requirement that parties interested in participating in the lottery eligibility list only need to communicate this in writing. Babcock asked LeFevere for his feedback on whether cities might grant priority for existing beer and wine licensees. LeFevere stated that he was unaware of a policy that had the detail of the District's policy relating to the issuance of intoxicating liquor licenses. Babcock stated that he believed intoxicating liquor licenses would be purchased and transferred through the purchase of a boat or business rather than through the distribution of a lottery system. Mr. Bob Ziton, representing Bayview Event Center and Charter Cruises, stated that he is a proponent of the first come, first serve basis. The 2000 season was the first season where demand for intoxicating liquor licenses exceeded supply available. He believed the District could create a commodity with a charter boat company by the issuing of a liquor license, whether or not the boat is operated. He encouraged the District to tie the issuance of a liquor license with a boat, with a full liquor license application to be completed by the February 1 deadline. He stated that he supports the charter boat association position to provide priority for existing charter boats that currently have beer and wine licenses. Babcock stated that he was uncomfortable with the first come, first served basis because it assigns monetary value to a place in a waiting list. The Code or policy might need to require a must operate clause for the season the intoxicating liquor license is issued. Nelson stated there is no speculation on the lottery eligibility list because the issuance of an intoxicating liquor license requires a charter boat being operated on the lake. Mr. Alan Haskins, owner of Barefoot Bay Charters, stated that he was speaking on behalf of himself and his company. He expressed concern that the District does not understand the needs and positions of the charter boat owners on Lake Minnetonka. He added he would like a wdtten response to why there might be a need for increased law enforcement if the number of intoxicating liquor licenses that can be issued on Lake Minnetonka is increased. He believed a number of residents on the lake support charter boat activities as an alternative to enjoy the lake. Babcock stated that the District has supported charter boat activities on the lake for several years; however, there are a number of residents on the lake that do not share the view of the District. He thanked the Board and the public on discussion of this agenda item, noting that it would be brought back for further discussion at the 1/10/01 Regular Board meeting. C. Additional Business. There was no additional business. FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers (11/16/00- 11 ~30~00) and (12/1/00- 12/15/00). Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 13, 2000 Page6 Nelson reviewed the' audit of. voUchers for payment as submitted. · . ; ..';. : ,; , . . ~ . ~ - . MOTION: Foster moved, McMillan seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted. VOTE: Ayes (7),'Abstained (1, Van Hercke); motion carded. B. October financial summary and balance sheet. Nelson reviewed the October financial summary and balance sheet as submitted. MOTION: Foster moved, Eggers seconded to accept the October financial summary and balance sheet as submitted. VOTE: Ayes (7), Abstained (1, Van Hercke)i motion carried. C. Additional Business. There was no additional business. ADMINISTRAT!O'N A. Update of 11/15/00 Executive Session to discuss performance of Executive Director. Babcock summarized the 11/15/00 Executive Session to discuss the performance of the Executive Director, Greg Nybeck. He stated that feedback from the Board was very positive and that his current annual compensation is $48,000. He encouraged a motion from the Board to adjust his annual compensation, retroactive to 11/1/00. LeFevere stated that other city collective bargaining agreements he had seen were in the range of four percent, plus additional assistance on insurance. He noted that this does not take into account merit adjustments. MOTION: Nelson moved, Foster seconded to adjust the annual salary of Greg Nybeck from $48,000 to $51,000, retroactive to 11/1/00. VOTE: Ayes (7), Abstained (1, Van Hercke); motion carried. Babcock thanked Nybeck for his support and organization. B. Additional Business.' There was no additional business. 5. EWM/EXOTCS TASK FORCE A. Minutes from the 12/8/00 EWM/Exotics Task Force meeting. Nybeck stated that these minutes are not complete and that they would be included in the 1/10/01 Board packet. Suerth provided an overview of this meeting. He made the following comments: Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December 13, 2000 Page 7 · The use of 2,4-D herbicides as a supplement to:the milfoil harvesting program, was discussed. · A proposal to conduct Lake Uinnetonka milfoil weevil surveys and augmentation studies was disCussed. This will be forwarded for Board discussion at the 1/10/01 Regular Board meeting. · Brainstorming of changes to the District zebra mussel program was discussed, with essentially no new ideas. He stated that the Task Force has recommended a public input meeting at the beginning of 2001 to gather new ideas. · An EWM Harvesting Program Working Group meeting planned for Saturday, 1/13/00, at 9 a.m in the District office. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. SAVE THE LAKE A. Discussion on establishing date for 2001 "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet Dinner. Babcock stated that staff has recommended two potential dates for the Banquet Dinner, 1/25/01 or 2/1/01. MOTION: Foster moved, Nelson seconded to establish 2Jl/01 as the date for the 2001 "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet Dinner. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. B. Consideration of 2000 Hennepin County Sheriffs Office Special Deputy Candidates. Babcock stated that two candidates have been forwarded by the Hennepin County Shedffs Office Water Patrol for the 2000 Special Deputy Award. The candidates include Brian Lacey and Chuck Leif, with both candidates being well qualified. MOTION: Foster moved, McMillan seconded to award the 2000 Special Deputy Award to Brian Lacey. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. C. Consideration of one-time funding for recruitment of Special Deputies for 2001 Boating Season. Babcock stated that he attended the annual meeting with the Hennepin County Shedffs Office Special Deputies, noting that Shedff Pat McGowan and LMCD Prosecuting Attomey Steve Tallen were also in attendance. At this meeting, there was request for one-time funding, of approximately $2,000, for the recruitment of additional Special Deputies. They believed the court case that was recently ruled by the Minnesota Supreme Court impacted the morale and recruitment of additional Special Deputies. - The consensus of the Board was to receive more information from the Water Patrol, in writing, on what they plan to do with the funding, goals and objectives, etc. The Board directed Babcock to notify the Water Patrol that the Board is inclined to grant a one-time $2,000 contribution, possibly out of the "Save the Lake" fund, subject to receiving a recruitment plan. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting December t3, 2000 Page 8 D. Additional Business. 'There was no additional business. '"' "' Nybeck stated that he understood the Board is Iook!ng for a more comprehensive Executive Director Repod at the Board meeting. He asked for direction from the Board on what they wanted included in this Repod. The consensus of the Board was to include a general overview of the day-to-day aclivities in the office on this Report. 8. OLD BUSINESS. There was no old business. 9. NEW BUSINESS. Partyka announced that this.was the last Board meeting he would be attending. He thanked the Board for the past Seven years that he had served on the Board. The B°ard complimented the efforts of Partyka for his public service on the Board the past seven years. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m. Douglas Babcock, Chairman Albed Foster, Vice-Chairman 5450 Westonka Healthy Comm, mlty Collaborative Agenda - Jan. 19, 2001, 7:15 - 9:00 a.m. Mound City Hall 1. Social Coffee, tea, rolls, fruit and juice start at 7:15 2. Introductions 7:30 3. Additions or Changes to the Agenda / Minutes (5 min.) 4. ,~nnouncements (5 min.) 5. Call for task force members to develop the permanent skate park. (5 min.) We need people willing to help with fundraising, sponsorship, and youth coordination to advance the skate park. We have received some donations for the skate park but still have a long way to go. Jason Swenson, Mound Police Department, has agreed to work on the skate park for his SARA project. 6. Metro Plains Development, Larry Olson ( 40 min. ) Metro Plains is in the process of developing the old community center property on the corner of Commerce Blvd. and Lynwood Blvd. They will show us the plans so we will be able to pass on "real" information and see how the plan fits into our community. At the time of this agenda, the plans have not been approved but are in the final stages of planning and approval. "We should all be concerned about the future because we will have to spend the rest of our lives there." By Charles F. I~ertering Health Carol Olson, Patricia Anderson, Sandy Olstad, Carolyn Schmidt, Mary Goode, Jeanette Metz, Mark Brekke The newspaper article on Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD} was printed in the Lakeshore Weekly. We'll have a copy at the next WI-ICC meeting. Youth Activities Sandy Rauschendorfer-temp chair, Chris Valerius, Sue Cathers, Jean Ann Thayer, Patsy Kiesow We are in the process of forming a task force to work on the skate park. Mound Police Officer, Jason Swenson, has agreed to work on the skate park as part of his SARA project. We need lots of help with this project. Parenting Sandy Wing, Sandy Olstad, Jeanne Stortz, Bill Erickson Pleas'e attend and promote bur upcoming speakers- · Mike Patrick will talk to parents about motivating their child on the evening of Jan. 23. · Misti Snow, with the Star Tribune's Mindworks, will be the featured speaker on Feb. 3. There will be half hour breakout sessions after Misty's keynote featuring Brian Powers discussing depression, Kathy Jones talking about current trends in chemical use, and representatives from Wayzata's Family Life First talking about their program to take back family life. We'll have promotional handouts at the next WHCC meeting. Community Margaret tlolste, Cathy Bailey, Cheryl Fischer, Edith Travers The County is in the process of sending us the money for the pilot project that the community group is going to work on. We can use more people on this group! Communications Jeanne Stortz, Lisa Whalen, Anne Wilbur, Carol Olson We are working on a communications plan and redoing our WHCC brochure. Any suggestions, pass them on! Finance and Operations Mike Looby, Len Harrell, Margaret Hulste, Craig Anderson, Patricia Anderson All the work groups will be putting together their budget requests by February and the F and O will be reviewing them. · Executive Carol Olson, Jeanne Stortz, Margaret Holste, Sandy Wing, Sandy Raushendorfer, Sue Cathers, Mike Looby The Executive work group has not needed to meet lately. Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative Minutes · November 17, 2000. Present: Patricia Anderson, Cathy Bailey, John Braland, Sue Cathers, Kathy Jones. Patsy Kiesow. Mike Looby, Jeanette Metz, Carol Olson, Sandy Olstad, Sandy Raushendorfer. Carolyn Schmidt, Jeanne Stortz. JeanAnn Thayer. Leah Weycker. Sandy Wing, Guests: Peter Meyer, Gina Coburn. Sarah Heyer. Additions or Changes to the Agenda or Minutes: Jeanne Stortz wanted to make sure that the minutes are clear that the group discussing the skate park will also be discussing the BMX track that Pastor John brought up at the last meeting. Patricia Anderson made a motion to approve the minutes. Sandy Olstad seconded the motion, Passed. Leah added on a recon~mendation from the executive :york group to fund Relate Counseling and Sue Cathers would like to discuss the Parent Mobilization grant. We discussed the request to fund an "on call" crisis counseling for the school district. Margaret Holste wasn't able to be at this meeting because she was ill, but Kathy Jones will be able to answer some questions about the service. The service would offer an "on call" therapist or counselor for out of control students and suicidal or ver3.' depressed students. It would also offer anger management for students with an on going problem with anger. The school staff could call for this service when the situation goes out of their area of expertise. The request is for 40 hours of service for the year at the cost of $2,200. Jeanette Metz asked if this service is offered after school hours, and who they could call for those hours. The requested funding is just for school hours but in the past, the counselors have given out lists of services in the area. This list could include Relate. Since outcome reporting for spending needs to be done, how and who does the outcomes and tracking of the hours. Kathy Jones thought that the guidance department could review the progress and outcomes. Leah and Carol will xvork with them to track outcomes. It was pointed out that it is difficult to get health insurance plans to cover mental health issues. We wondered if this service should be offered to OLL and Calvary, and home school families. This will need to be checked into. We could offer a list of local service providers to students and or parents. Kathy Bailey made a motion to approve $2,200 for 40 hours of Relate's counseling service. Sue Cathers seconded the motion. Mike Looby made a friendly amendment to add the wording "not to exceed $2,200." The friendly amendment was accepted and the motion passed. Sue Cathers talked about the Alliance grant for Parent Mobilization. She wanted ideas on how to best reach parents. Gina Coburn talked about the Wayzata movement called Family Life First. The Wayzata Collaborative is using their Parent Mobilization grant money to put towards letting parents knmv about selling houndaries around their family first. Leah xvas given direction to brim3 this up to each of the work groups. Leah read a beautiful letter that was written by Gregory Metz from Baywind Christian Church. They donated $600 to be used for teen programing. Patricia Anderson said we need to connect with them and recognize them. We should keep alive the wonderful letter that the,v wrote. We should ask them what are the needs that they are seeing? Keep them informed. Nominations and vote for Chairperson attd vice chair person John Braland made a motion to recognize Carol Olson as the chair of the collaborative for another year. Carol respectfully declined, stating the need to spread the leadership and the need to scale back her obligation to the Collaborative. We offered some options for the nominations and/or chair position. Carol Olson, Jeanette Metz, Cathy Bailey and Jeanne Slo.~z xvill be a nominalion team ~o research possihle candidates and come with ~ recommendation at the next rn.eetiqg in JanuarY~' "CommuniO~" and Famil, v Life First Gina Cobum, our featured speaker, talked about building an intentio,ml community. It is an old xvay to took at a "place" as a community. Look at community in a differeqt light and create your oxvn community ~vherever you want it. You are each a gate keeper of a place that you can make community. It could be intergenerational community. One idea is to celebrate the seasons. Our earliest memories are associated with seasons and events. Repeating these events builds community. Start practicing being a community. There are things you have to give up. If you are waiting for )'our house to be painted before you can have that party. Have a painting party. Be willing to ask for help. This builds supports outside your family and helps create a successful community. The Collaborative could be known as the group that always brings hot chocolate to the sliding hill at Shirley Hills. Perhaps the schools get involved by opening their door to act as a ~varming house. Who else could participate? Who might want to get in on the fun? On February 24, from 9-4 pm., the Families First group xvill be explaining their model. This model can be used for many different situations. Gina is inviting us to come learn more about this very successful concept. Gina is willing to answer any question you may have or a,~y ~pe of help you need in building community. GCoburn~pclink.com or phone her at 763-475-0822. Patricia moved adjournment and Sandy Olstad seconded. Passed. GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 180 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 800, Chicago, ~linois 60601 January 11, 2001 312/977-9700. Fax:312/977-4806 Ms. Kandis M. Hanson City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1687 Dear Ms. Hanson: We are pleased to notify you that your comprehensive annual finan- · .cial. report4, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 qualifies for a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. The Certificate of Achievement plaque will be shipped to: Mr. Gino Businaro Finance Director under separate cover in about eight weeks. We hope that you will arrange for a formal presentation of the Certificate and Award of Financial Reporting Achievement, and that appropriate publicity will be given to this notable achievement. To assist with this, enclosed are a sample news release and the Certificate Program "Results" for reports with fiscal years ended during 1998 repre- senting the most recent statistics available. We hope that your example will encourage other government offi- cials in their efforts to achieve and maintain an appropriate standard of excellence in financial reporting. Sincerely, GOVERN~ENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION Stephen J. Gauth~i~r~J Director/Technical Services Center SJG/ds WASHINGTON OFF~CE 1750 K Street, N.W., Suite 650, Washington. DC 20006 202/429-2750 · Fax: 202/429-2755 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION lB0 No~h Michigan Avenue, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois 60601 312/977-9700 · Fax: 312/977-4806 January 11, 2001 For information contact: NEWS RELEASE Stephen Gauthier (312) 977-9700 (Chicago)--The Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Finan- cial Reporting has been awarded to: City of Mound, ~N by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR). The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplish- ment by a government and its management. An Award of Financial Reporting Achievement has been awarded to the individual(s), department or agency designated by the government as primarily responsible for preparing the award- winning CAFR. This has been presented to: Gino Businaro, Finance Director The CAFR has been judged by an impartial panel to meet the high standards of the program including demonstrating a construc- tive "spirit of full disclosure" to clearly communicate its financial story and motivate potential users and user groups to read the CAFR. The GFOA is a nonprofit professional association serving approximately 14,000 government finance professionals with offices in Chicago, Illinois, and Washington, D.C. - 30 - WASHINGTON OFFICE 1750 K Street, N.W., Suite 650, Washington, DC 20006 202/429-2750 · Fax: 202/429-2755