The URL can be used to link to this page

83-12-20 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 6:30 P.M., TUESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 1983 COUNCIL CHAMBERS Approve Minutes of December 6, 1983, Regular Meeting Approve Minutes of December 13, 1983, Special Meeting Review of Consultants Report on Public Works Building Pg. 3064-3073 \ Pg. 3074-3078 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: CASE #8~-268 - Ed. M. Monette, 2919 Holt Lane, Lot 4, Block 19, Minnesota Summer Baptist Assembly RE: Lot Size Variance Pg. 3079-3085 CASE #83-269 - Lou Beasley, 1932 Shorewood Lane, Lots 8 & 9, Block 2, Shadywood Point RE: Lot SDlit/Subdivioio~ Appointment of Planning Commissioners for 1984 Purchase of 1984 Police Car through Hennepin County Bid (Budgeted for in 1984 Capital Outlay Budget) PUBLIC HEARING: 7:30 P.M. - Adoption of 1984 Federal Revenue Sharing Budget Plan %~. PUBLIC HEARING: Delinquent Utility Accounts Proposed 1984 Sanitary Sewer Rate Analysis %0~. ApprovaI of 1984 City employee's salaries )% -1~. Comments & Suggestions from citizens present· ~'~. PAYMENT REOUEST - A & K Construction, Booster Pump Station - $18,601.57 \~. PAYMENT REQUEST - Webco Tank Co., Standpipe - $7,413.75 Pg. 3086-3092 Pg. 3093 Pg. 3094-3102 Pg. 3103-3108 Pg. 31'09-3110 Pg. 3111-3119h Pg. 3120-3121 Pg. 3122-3125 Pg. 3126-3128 Payment of Bills PAGE 3062 1~. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Ehlers & Associates Newsletter B. American Legion Post 398 Gambling Report C. Letter from Metro Council regarding Senior Citizen Van D. Report on City Water System for 1983 from State Health Dept. Adjourn for Christmas Party PE. 3129=3130 Pg. 3131 Pg. 3132-3134 Pg. 3135-3144 December '6, 1983 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was held at 5B41 Maywood Road in said City on December 6, 198B. Those present were: Acting Mayor Pinky Charon, Councilmembers Pkyllis Jessen, Gary Paulsen and Russ Peterson. Mayor Bob Polston arrived late. Also present were: City Manager Jon Elam, City Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer John Cameron, Police Chief Bruce Wold, Building Official Jan Bertrand, Finance Director Sharon Legg, City. Clerk Fran Clark, Public Works Superintendent Geno Hoff, Mr. & Mrs. Jim Regan, Harold Kutzner, Ron Cloud, Lowell Zitzloff, Ron Fierst, representa- tives from Case Power Equip., Sweeney Bros. Tractor and Ziegler, Inc. Acting Mayor Charon opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. MINUTES The Minutes of the November 15, 1983, Regular Meeting were presented for consideration. Peterson moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to approve the Minutes of the November 15, 1983, Regular Meeting as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PETITION TO RESTRICT PARKING ON pIPER ROAD The City Manager explained that the City has received a petition signed by 55 people asking that the City Council restrict parking on both sides of Piper Road from Tuxedo Blvd. to Warner Lane for the safety of motorists and pedestrians. The Police Chief had written a memo to the City Manager explaining his research into Piper Road. It stated that the signs had not been reinstalled-following the completion of a paving project and that in his conversations with some of the petitioners there are some reasons for amending the ordinance as it is written. The problems seem to be the character of the roadway and the lines of sight along the roadway; the fact that Piper Road serves as an arterial to Warner Lane and for those residents living on Cedar Point; the road has a steep hill which is difficult to climb during some of the winter months; a retaining wall on the southeast corner of the intersection of Piper Road and Warner Lane severly limits visibility for cars traveling north on Warner and attempting to view traffic traveling west on Pip6r. Because of the above residents are complaining about near head on collisions and the need to amend the ordinance to restrict all parking on Piper Road. The Police Chief is recommending that the Council amend the Ordinance to ban parking on the the north side of Piper Road from Warner Lane to Tuxedo Blvd, because that part of the road is wide enough t~ permit parking on one side of the street and he feels it would b& a hardship on persons living on Piper Road to find parking December 6, 1983 for guests who wanted to visit. Mr. Jim Regan, 5334 Piper Road, was present and stated that he dis- agrees with the Police Chief about a restriction of parking causing a hardship for the residents of Piper Road. He stated he feels everyone on Piper Road has ample room on their property to park additional cars and does except for one party who has about 4 or 5 vehicles which are always parked illegally on the street. He stated he started the petition and is still asking that parking be banned on both si~es of Piper Road. The Council discussed the problems on Piper Road and asked if the residents had been notified that this request was~on the Agenda this evening. The City Manager answered yes. Councilmember Jessen stated that she would be in favor of the Police Chief's recommendation for parking on one side of Piper Road to begin with and then if that didn't bring.any adverse reaction from the residents after a yea~ maybe banning on both sides. Peterson moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to have the City Attorney put in ordinance form an amendment to Chapter 46 of the City Code banning parking on either side of Piper Road from Tuxedo to Warner and bring back before the end of the meeting. The vote was 3 in favor with Councilmember Jessen voting nay. Motion carried. ON STREET PARKING VARIANCE - BRYANT LANE The' City Manager eXplained that this is an on street' parking variance that is being requested by Roger Frank, 3061 Highland Blvd. because. his house fronts on Highland Blvd. but has no driveway on Highland. His access to the property is on Bryant Lane, a dead end street off of Idlewood. He has stated on the application that he will be building a double garage off of Bryant in the Spripg, with enough space left on the apron for 2 additional cars off. of Bryant. The Street Superinten- dent has rec.ommended approval of this variance for this Winter season. Peterson moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to approve the "on street parking variance of Roger Frank, 3061 Highland Blvd. for the 198384 winter season. The vote was unanimoulsy in favor. Motion carried. REVISION OF PLANNING & DOCK FEES FOR 1984 The City Manager explained that as a followup to the 1984 Budget review, he is proposing a list of increases for the planning, zoning and dock fees for 1984. They will more closely reflect the actual costs incurred by the City in reviewing and processing time. The changes would be as follows: 1983 APPLICATION COSTS ,PROPOSED 1984 COSTS Variance 35.00 50.00 2 Conditional Use Wetland Permit Street or Easement Vacation 100.00 100.00 100.00 SUBDIVISION 200.00 plus $7.00/10t Preliminary Plat Final Plat Lot Split (Waiver of provisions of City Code, Chapter 22) December 6, 1983 200.00 100.00 150.00 --0-- Zoning Amendment Dock Permit (per year) Commercial Dock License -0- 150.00 -0- 100.00 35.00 50.00 100.00 200.00 65.00 75.'.00 100.00 150.00 The City Manager explained that one of his goals is to make the Planning and Zoning Department selfsufficient and this increase will help move toward this goal. With the Dock Permits at $75.00 per year Ghat will give commons maintenance another $4,000 to work with. Councilmember Paulsen asked if that was all that would be spent on commons maintenance. The City Manager stated that there is money in Revenue Sharing that also will be spent for commons maintenance. Peterson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~83-212 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE REVISION OF PLANNING & DOCK FEES FOR 198~ The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE ~83-26~: HAROLD L, KUTZNER, 4653 CARLOW ROAD, LOT SPLIT/SUB DIVISION The City Manager explained that Mr. Kutzner wants to split Lot 5 off and deed it to his neighbor, Mr. Cloud, so he can combine it with his other lots-(Lots 19,20, 21 and 22). The reason for this is that this lot can only be reached easily from Mr. Cloud's property. Next he would like to combine the South 1/2 of Lots 1,2,3,and 4 with Lots 23, 24, 25 and 26 so that the house his daughter lives in will have more land. Mr. Kutzner plans to keep the North 1/2 of Lots 1,2,3, and 4 as access to Lots 37, 38, 39, 2, 3, 4, and 5, of Block 10 (providing a way to the lake which he wants someday to deed to his grandchildren). This land is wetlands and unbuildable. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the lot split/sub- division. Mr. Kutzner and Mr. Cloud were present. Peterson 'moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution: December 6, 1983 RESOLUTION ~83-213 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COM- MISSION AND APPROVE THE LOT SPLIT/SUB- DIVISION AS REQUESTED - PID ~19-117-23 P2 0127 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE ~83-265: LOWELL ZITZLOFF, 6365 BAY RIDGE ROAD, VARIANCE FOR ACCESSORY BUILDING PROVISIONS The City Manager explained the Mr. Zitzloff is asking to be allowed to install a bathroom in his garage. The Planning Commission recommended approval with the stipulation that any future remodeling on this accessory building would be brought before the Planning Commission and that the garage will not be converted for living area. Jessen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION $83-21~ RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COM- MISSION AND APPROVE A VARIANCE FOR A BATHROOM TO BE INSTALLED IN THE ~'GARAGE WITH STIPULATIONS The vote was.unanimously in favor. Motion carried. SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING; VACATING A PART OF LAGOON PARK, NED PODANY Peberson moved and Jessen seconded a motion to se't the date for a public hearing on the.vacation of part of Lagoon Park for January 17,' 1983, at 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion. carried. CASE ~83-255; SCHLEE, BUILDERS, WOODCREST OF MOUND 3RD ADDITION, VARIANCES TO FRONT YARD SETBACKS The City Manager stated that this item has been continued from pre- vious meetings and that Schlee Builders has now submitted drawings for the 5 lots in Block 1 showing the homes at 20 and 30 foot setbacks and their relationship to the hill. The Council asked various questions about the possible drainage problems that might ocurr. Mr. Fierst stated that he would have to submit a drainage plan to the Building Inspector for approval before building permits would be issued so he didn't think that would be a problem. He stated he still felt that a 20 foot setback would be an advantage to the people who would eventually own the homes because it would not place the back of their homes right up against the hill. Councilmember Jessen asked if they could place a different style home on the lots and maybe even combine some of the lots so that they met the setbacks. Mr. Fierst stated no that financially that would not be feasible and would not change where they wanted the setbacks becaus~ 4 December 6, 1983 The Council then discussed retaining walls, etc. to control erosion and look aesthetically more desirable. · Councilmember Peterson stated he thought they could meet the 30 foot setback on Lots 1 and 2 with no problem. Acting Mayor Charon agreed. ?eterson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~83-215 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A 10 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR LOTS 3,4 AND 5, BL~CK 1, WITH LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK~ WOODCREST 3RD ADDITION TO MEET THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SET BACK The vote was 2 in favor with Councilmembers Jessen and Paulsen voting nay. Motion denied. Councilmembers Jessen and Paulsen both stated that do not believe in granting variances on new construction and that the ordinance should be followed for new construction. BINGO PERMITS_ The City Manager explained that both of the following permits are for 1984; Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church and American Legion Post #398. Paulsen moved and JesSen seconded a motion to approve Bingo Permits for Out'Lady of the Lake Catholic Church (every Thursday during 1984 and 4 Saturdays dates to be determined) and American Legion Post #398 (3rd Wednesday of each month in 1984 and 4 dates to be determined). The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. pURCHASE OF POLICE, INVESTIGATOR AUTOMOBILE The City Manager explained that the Police Chief had suggested that the City purchase a different car for the police investigator. The body of the car is beginning to fall apart, it has 60,000 miles on it and the fr. ont seat is completely broken down. When they discussed this it was thought that buying a good used car might be a good alter- native because it could be traded every year and a half to two years and would also not allow people to predict the make of car he will be driving. The original idea was to purchase a car for approximately $2,500, but the used car market has been very tight and quality used cars ha,ye risen in price. Quality used cars 4 and 5 years old with 50 to 60,000 miles are priced at around $3,400. Two months ago, Sgt. Hudson purchased a 1978 Ford Thunderbird, paying $2,500 for the car and spending an additional $200 on tune-ups and licensing. He is willing to sell the car to the City for $2,600. The average book value on this car is around $2,900. The .City Manager and the Police Chief are ® December 6, 1983 recommending the purchase of this car because it appears to be the quality used car at the right price. Peterson moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to purchase the 1978 Ford Thunderbird from Sgt. Hudson for $2,600. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PAINTING INTERIOR OF CITY HALL The City Manager reported that he has received only one qu°tatiqn for the painting of the interior of City Hall. Several people were contacted and came out to look at the Hall but only one quoted, Minnetonka Painti'ng & Decorating Co. Paulsen moved and Jessen seconded a motion to table this item to the December 20th Meeting to allow the City Manager to secure at least one more quotation. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. BID TABULATION: LOAPER The City Manager explained that 3 bids were received On November 30, 1983, for the purchase of a four wheel articulated, rubber tired front end loader. They were as follows: CASE SWEENEY COMPANIES BIDDING: POWER EQUIP, BROS. TRACT. ZIEGLER, INC. MAKE: J.I.CASE FIATALLIS CATERPILLAR MODEL.:' W 14 H 345B 920 41,763.00 64,665.00 59,913.00 LESS TRADE IN -20,000,00 -38,665.00 PURCHASER PAYS ONLY THIS AMOUNT: 21,763'00 26,000.00 33,413.00 MAINTENANCE EXPENSE, for 5 years or 6,000 hours, which- ever occurs first, SHALL NOT EXCEED + 4,000.00 + 4,500.00 +'3,100.00 GUARANTEED "MINIMUM REPURCHASE" IN FIVE (5) YEARS -30,000.00 -34,000.00 -46,500.00 SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE COSTS (for 6,000 hours) ± 6,591.90 + 8,526.00 + 1,857.90 TOTAL COST 2,35q.90 5,026.00 -8,129.10 Public Works Superintendent, Geno Hoff, was present and gave a comparison of the the 3 machines with the specifications. 6 December 6,. 79 3 Each representative from the three companies was given a few minutes to explain his bid. The Council discussed the total cost bid concept which includes the guaranteed repurchase in 5 years. It was decided they probably will be taking advantage of the guaranteed repurchase this time because the loader is being used so much more since the streets have been paved· The Public Works Superintendent and the City Manager recommended the Ziegler total cost bid be approved. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~83-215 RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT THE BID OF ZIEGLER, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF A FOUR WHEEL ARTICULATED, RUBBER TIRED FRONT END LOADER The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ~ayor Polston arrived at 9:45 P.M. The City Attorney suggested that the Council go into Executive Session to discuss some pending litigation. Jessen moved and Paulsen seconded a .motion to go into Executive Session. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The council returned from Executive Session at 10:30 P.M. pAYMENT OF BILLS Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded a' motion to approve the bills as .presented on the pre-list in the amount of $55,296.86, when funds are available· A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 23 - RESTAURANTS The City Attorney submitted the ordinance amendment to Chapter 23 pertaining to restaurants that he was insturucted to put in ordinance form at the November 15, 1983, meeting. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded the following: ORDINANCE ~454 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 23.301 SUBSECTIONS 94 AND 95 AND ADDING SUBSECTIONS 95A AND 95B ~S NEW DEFINITIONS OF RESTAURANTS; AMENDING SECTION 23.625.3 BY ADDING CLASS III AND CLASS IV RESTAURANTS AS CONDITIONAL USES; AMENDING SECTION 23.630.3 BY ADDING CLASS II, III AND IV RESTAURANTS .AS CONDITIONAL USES; AMENDING SECTION · 23.635.2 TO ADD AS PERMITTED USED IN THE B-3 ZONING DISTRICT ALL PERMITTED USES IN THE R1, R2, 7 December 6, 1983 ZONING DISTRICT ALL PERMITTED USES IN THE R1, R2, R3 AND R~ ZONING DISTRICTS; AND AMENDING SECTION 23.635.3 BY ADDING CLASS I AND CLASS IV RESTAURANTS AS CONDITIONAL USES The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PIPER ROAD PARKING RESTRICTION (CONTINUED FROM EARLIER) The City Attorney presented the ordinance amendment in ordinance form. Jessen moved and ~eterson seconded the following: ORDINANCE ~55 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 46.29, SUBD. (b), SUBSECTION 18 AND REPEALING SECTION 46.19, SUBD. (b), SUBSECTION 21 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. RELEASE OF PID ~19-117-23 33 0192 FOR PUBLIC SALE The City Clerk stated that this parcel is a buidlable lot that is a tax forfiet, property and should be released for public sale by Hennepin County. The parcel is described as Lot 43 and the West 10 feet of Lot 44, also all that part of vacated street lying between the westerly extention across it to the North and South lines of said Lot '4~,. Pembroke. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded the~following resolution: RESOLUTION ~83-216 RESOLUTION RELEASING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS TO HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PUBLIC AUCTION AND CERTIFYING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS The vote was unanimously in favor. ~NFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Memo on Sewer and Water Funds. B. De E. F. G. Motion carried. Letter from Hennepin County on Repairing the Black Lake Bridge in 1984. Minnehaha Watershed District Agenda - November 17, 1983 and Minutes - October 20, 1983. Suburban Rate Authority Minutes of October 19, 1983. League of Cities Legislative contact form. Memo from Budd Robb.on Solid Waste Resource Recovery. Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Newsletter for November. 8 .H. J. K. L. December 6, 1983 Invitation to Cable Consultant's Holiday Party, December 17, 1983. Report on Fiscal Disparities· Cable T.V. Memo. Twin City Labor Market Information for November, 1983. Westonka Chamber Waves for December, 1983. MWCC Meeting Notice December 13, 1983, Deephaven City ·Hall. BRUCE WOLD'S RESIGNATION Police Chief Bruce Wold had submitted his resignation to the City Council because he will be moving to Phoenix due to his daughters h~alth and his wife's job. The Council all expressed sorrow that he is leaving and thanked him for the terrific job he has done in Mound and the many extra things he has done for Mound. Polston moved and Jessen seconded a motion to adjourn at 10:45 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Jon Elam, 'City Manager Fran Clark, City Clerk 9 BILLS .... DECEMBER 6~ Amer Steel & Industr AirComm Earl F. Andersen Armor Security Anchor Paper Acro-Minnesota Besco Masonry Badger Meter Holly Bostrom Burlington Northern Berry Auto & Body Bradley Exterminating Bowman Distribution Conway Fire & Safety Cash Register Sales Chapin Publishing Davies Water Equip Dependable Services First Sank Mpls Flexible Pipe ~ool Eugene Hickok & Assoc Hawkins Chemical Heiman Fire Equip Hayden-Murphy Equip Jones Chemical Robert E. Johnson Internatl Assn. Fire Johnson Service Lowells Auto McCombs Knutson Minnegasco' Mound Fire Dept Mound Medical Clinic City of Mound Newman Signs NW Bell Telephone Natl Fire Protection Pitney Bowes P.D.Q. Food Stores Pitney Bowes Credit Regal Window Cleaning Real One Acquisition Nels Schernau SOS Printing State Treas--Surplus Suburban Tire Swenson Nursery Thrifty Snyder Drug The Thomas Co. Treas--MCFOA 1983 Supply Chiefs Assn 77.51 100.O0 306.85 56.60 312.38 49.53 380.00 1,103.O8 386.00 533.33 13.50 19.oo 142.2o 228.92 861.30 29.40 1,450.OO 33.00 4. O0 515.69 585.84 695.50 181.50 180.25 169.84 3,OOO.OO 6O.OO 8O.OO 24.99. 1,440.OO 241.33 1,212.O0 297.00 55.08 235.50 96.40 353.82 238.25 i,188.85 26.00 10.75 675.00 31.29 136.85 7.7O 911.56 559.35 18.15 73.56 15.OO Tonka Printing Wurst, Pearson, Hamilton Western Tree Service Widmer Bros. Wacon ia Ford-Mercury Warner Hdwe Xerox Corp Ziegler, Inc. Amer Planning Assn Century Auto Body Commissloner of Revenue Continental Tele Mark Carvatt Griggs, Cooper Gene Garvais Bldr Robert E. Johnson Johnson Bros. Liquor I CMA MN State Document Mound Postmaster M.A.D. House City of Mound II II II Old Peoria N.S.P. Publication Office Ed Phillips & Sons State Treas-Surplus Jon Scherven Howard Simar Xerox. Corp TOTAL BI LLS 168.30 3,125.00 585.OO 426.62 42.71 17.26 151.39 48.34 29.00 5OO.OO 5,800.42 1,20~. 93 19.96 3,927.43 35.00 4.4O 6,376.85 22.25 109.25 107.4o 28.36 38.15 25.OO 2,639.00 4,768.16 8.95 3,791.80 25.OO 75o.oo 155.00 961.28 55,296.86 December 13, 1983 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was held at 5341 Maywood Road in said City on December 13, 1983. Those present were: Acting Mayor Russ Peterson, Coun¢ilmembers Phyllis Jessen and Gary Paulsen. Mayor Bob Polston and Council~ember Pinky Charon were absent and excused. Also present were: ~olice Chief Bruce Wold, City Clerk Fran Clark and City Engineer John Cameron. Acting Mayor Peterson opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. M,S.A, CONSTRUCTION FUND STATUS REPORT City Engineer John Cameron was present and handed out a map of the City denoting State Aid streets and County State Aid highways. He explained that as of December 31, 1983, the City should have $95,462.49 in their construction fund. The tentative apportionment for 1984 is $141,872.00, of which $34,000 will be earmarked for main- tenance, leaving $107,872.00 to be added to the construction fund. Each year the City makes their interest and principal payment from these funds for the MSA Bonds that were sold in 1981. Only principal is paid from the construction fund, interest is paid from maintenance funds.. He estimated what the City 'can expect to have $433,000 in their construction fund at the end of each year through 1988, if no mones were spent except for the bond principal payments. The State Aid rules set a maximum which is allowed to accumulate in the construction, fund at $300,000 or twice the annual allotment (whichever is greater) as of June 30 of the current year, not including the current year's allotment. This would mean that the City would not have to use any of this fund until at least 1987 or possible 1988. The one street that could be considered for improvement, because of the possible Post Office remodeling, is Auditor's Road. The State has the first 530 feet east of Commerce designated as one section and from this point across Lost Lake to Cypress Lane at City Hall as another section. The dividing point for these two sections is approximately at the M.T.C. driveway. The estimated cost for complete improvements for this first section, as per MSA estimates, is approximately $67,000. This might be the time to consider making Auditor's Ro'ad more than an alley possibly rerouting the road slightly to provide parking closer to the businesses on that road. The City is .4 of a mile shore of the maximum State Aid designation. The extension of Belmont Lane past the Post Office could probably be added to-the system. MSA monies could then be used for upgrading this December 13, 1983 section along with all of Auditor's Road. The approximate cost of the two would be $150,000. According to all calculations, this money would be available in the construction fund at any time. Both of these areas can be discussed in more dept'h when the preliminary engineering report on the Post Office improvements is presented in the near future. 1983 DOCK PERMIT REFUNDS The City Clerk explained that these refunds are for people who applied late in the season and did not receive a dock placement. Paulsen moved and Jessen seconded a motion to approve refunds for dock permits that were not issued to Renate Kelly, 1725 Wildhurst; Robert Holz, 2549 Emerald Lane; and Donald E. Willis, 6048 Beachwood Road. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. UPDATE ON ROOF REPAIR CLAIM The City Attorney had submitted a letter he has written to Sander and Co. regarding the City Hall roof leak and the extended guarantee. This was an information item. No action was taken. UNION CONTRACTS The Police Chief and City Clerk went over the Public Works, Patrolmem 'and Police Supervisor's Union contracts and the changes that were made with'the-City Council. They all settled for increases of 5.0% in 1984, 5.5% in 1985 and 6.0% in 1986. The Public Works and Patrolmen.' Contracts are for 3 years and the Police Supervisor Contract is for 2' years. The Police Chief reported that any other changes in the Contracts were language clarification changes. The Council complimented the City Man~ger and the Police Chief on their efforts during the negotiation of the Contracts. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~83-217 RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 320 - PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEES The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 3075' December 13, 1983 Paulsen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #83-218 RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 320 - POLICE PATROLMEN The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~83-219 RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH THE LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICE, INC., LOCAL 35 - LELS POLICE SUPERVISOR/SERGEANTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. SET DATE FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION MEETING ON 1984 pROGRAMS & PRIORITIES The Council had previously discussed having a discussion meeting on next year's programs and priorities and the City Manager has suggested the following date: Saturday, January 7, 1984, from 9:00 A.M. to Noon at the City Hall. Peterson moved and Jessen seconded a motion to have a City Council discussion meeting on Sa,turday, January 7, 1984, from 9:00 A.M. to Noon at the City Hall. City Clerk to post notices. The vote was unanimously in.favor. Motion carried. PAYMENT OF BILLS paUlsen moved and 'Peterson seconded a motion to approve the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $107,176.68, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS Notice of Public Hearing regarding the selection and purchase of the West Riverbank Site for a solid waste resource recovery facility. Be LMCD Agenda for December 7, 1983, and Minutes for October 26, 1983. LMCD Resolution accepting the report of the Lake Minnetonka Task Force. Minutes of Ind. School Dist. #277 November 14, 1983, meeting. December 13, 1983 E. Hennepin County Transportatin Coordination Program for December. F. Metro Council "Review", November 23, 1983. G. Humphrey Institute Calendar for December, 1983. Paulsen moved and Jessen seconded a motion to adjourn at 8:15 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Jon Elam, City Manager Fran Clark, City Clerk 7 4 BILLS ...... DECEMBER 13, 1983 Allstar Electric EaF1 F. AndeF$¢n & Assoc Ac ro-M i nnesota Butch's Bar Supply Bryan Rock Prod. Robert Cheney Coca Cola City Club Distributing Coast to Coast Bill Clark Oil Cargill Salt Day Distributing East Side Beverage Empire Crown Auto Flaherty's Happy Tyme Judy Fisher G 1 enwood Ing 1 ewood Henn Co. Sheriffs Dept Island Park Skel'ly J.B. Distributing Tom Jacobs Illies& Sons Kool Kube Ice Lowel 1 s Wm Mueller & Sons Marina Auto Supply Minnesota MFOA Mound Fire Dept City of Mound MN State Fire Instr. Mack Truck Mi nnegasco N.S.P. Navarre Hdwe NW Bell Tele A~J. Ogle Co. Pepsi Cola Pogreba Distributing P.D.Q. Food Stores Pam Oil Inc.. Royal Crown' Beverage Reo Raj Kennels Spring Park Car Wash SOS Printing St. Louis Park Police Shepherds Rental Rugs Smith Heating Twin City Home Juice Thorpe Distributing Jim Thompson Title Ins. Thurk Bros. Chev. Assn 710.53 ll.18 38.79 4O7.24 17.95 334.00 224.37 3,263.15 43.83 1,172.64 1,557.50 3,349.51 3,330.05 7.45 190.20 46.84 50.35 7,659.52 471.10 8O.4O 125.00 3,243.50 120.OO 20.15 1,351.18 820.60 10.OO 5,516.60 25.00 90.12 939.O1 1,762.26 5,527.91 412.25 899.47 1,825.15 235.20 3,592.50 1,347.44 114.OO 96.80 296.00 88.OO 388.50 19.20 26.50 175.OO 26.97 3,795.55 817.70 41.OO 62.91 Trl State Pump Thurk Implement Unitog Rental Wallin Heating American Motel Dock Refunds (3) Griggs Cooper Dr. & Mrs Hannan Wm Hud son Johnson Bros. Liq. Johnson Welding Herman Kraft Metro Waste Commission City of Mound Mound Postmaster Metro Waste Control Old Peoria Nat'l Info. Data Joyce Nel son Ed Phillips & Sons W.J. White Co. P.E.R.A. State Treasurer TOTAL BILLS 686.93 18.00 273.99 64.10 27.25 195.O0 3,663.50 175.O0 2,600.00 3,271.63 5OO.OO 37.38 26,126.47 38.15 6OO.O0 1,262.25 2,132.5! 22.95 15.O0 2,810.89 2,000.00 2,539.22 1,338.39 107,176.68 CASE NO. 83-268 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Planning Commission Agenda of December 12, 1983: Board of Appeals Case No. 83-268 Location: 2919 Holt Lane Legal Desc.: Lot 4, Block 6, Minnesota Summer Baptist Assembly Request: Lot size and bulk of structure variance. Zoning District: R-3 APplicant Edward M. Monette 2919 Holt Lane Mound, MN. 55364 Phone: 472-7513 The applicant, Mr. Monette, is requesting to repair and replace a collapsed basement wall section of his home. The Zoning Code Section 23.404(7) states: "Normal maintenance of a building or other structure containing or related to a lawful non-conforming use is permitted, including necessary non- structural repairs and incidental alterations which do not extend'or intensi- fy the non-conforming use." The Zoning Ordinance for the R-3 Zoning District requires 6,000 square foot lot size. This parcel has 4,273 square .feet±. The floor area required is 840 s_quare feet; the present floor area is 1040 square feet on main floor. Recommendation: I would 'recommend the structural repairs need to be made to the structure. The structure and use will not be intensified in size by the repairs. The lot is undersized by the present Zoning Ordinance. The abutting neighbors have been notified. Jan Bertrand Building Official BOARD OF APPEALS l, Case No. 83-268 Lot Size.Vari~nce,.2~l~ Holt-Lane- Lot 4, Block 6, Minnesota Summer Baptist Assembly - Mr. and Mrs. Edward Monette were present. The Building Inspector explained that applicant wants to replace a portion of the foundation. Area he would like to'replace with new foundation .is 10 feet on the south side .of building from new portion toeast. New addition portion is on piers, but main body.of house is on crawl space. Vargo.questioned.that this application is before the commission only because of the undersized lot. Vargo moved and Michael seconded a motion.to approve the lot size variance to allow structural repairs. The vote was unanimously in favor. ~O8~5) CITY O~ HOUND Application No. CASE NO. D~te Filed LICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION rlease type the following information) 2.' Legal Description of Property: Lot 4 4. Applicant '(if other than owner): Name Block 6 PID No. 23-117-24 42 0073 6181 O/43OO Day Phone No. HT~-7~1/_~ Day Phone No. Address TyPe of Request: / (~Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. (') Amendment ( ) Sign Permit '( )*Other f other, specify: resent Zoning District ~-~ 'Existin~ Use(s) of Property 8. .Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or · other zoning procedure for thls property? '~O if so, list date(s) of list date(s) of applicption, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany pnesent request. ! certify that all of the.above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized offigial of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Signature of Appl icant _~,~~2 ~'~./~~~ ~ Date~m~J- ~.lF))~ Planning Commission Recommendation: Council Action:' Date Resolution No. R~quest' for zoni,ng Variance procedure (2) C~se ~' 83~268 D. Location of: Signs, easements~ underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction .F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning O.rdinance. I!1. Request for a Zonln9 Variance A. All..i~formation below, a site plan, as descr'ibed in Part !1, and general application must be provided before a hearing.w!l.1 be scheduled. · ~ the propert¥'conform to A~I use regulations fo~ B. Does the present use the zone district in ~hmch it is located? Yes ('~) No ( )' If "no", specify each n~n-conforming use: 'C. De Do .the existing.structures comply with all area height and bul.k~'regulations for the ~one' district in'which i't'is-.locat~ed.? Yes ( ) No'(X) if :'no", specify ~ach non-conforming use: ~'-.~-~P.~' U~:%S~ ~/~] reasonable use for any of the .uses.permitted in that zonlng.district? ( )~ .Too ~arrow ( . ) Topography ( ) Soil (~ Too. small :. · ( )' Drainage.. (.) Sub-surface ( ) Too shallow ( ) Shape ( ) Other: Specify: E..Was-the' hardship described ab~'create~ by the a~tion of anyone havi.ng p~opert¥ interests in the land after the Zohing Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (L->I~ If yes, explain: F. Was the hardship created by"any"other~man-made change, such as the reloca- .tion of a road? Yes ( ) No (~)- If yes, explain: Are the conditions of hardship for'Which:you request a variance peculi~r only to the property descrlbedlin this petition? Yes { )-'No If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? H..)Jhat is the "minimum" modification .(variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, i'f necessary.) I. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? 3oF3 CASE NO. 83-268 I OqC/ S~l' r r, I I A PROPOSED RESOLUTION Case #83-268 RE§OLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNINC COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A LOT SIZE VARIANCE TO ALLOW STRUCTURAL REPAIRS ON LOT 4, BLOCK 6, MINNESOTA SUMMER BAPTIST ASSEMBLY PID# 23-117-24 42 0073 WHEREAS, the owner of the property described as Lot. 4, Block 6, Minnesota Summer Baptist Assembly, PID# 23-117-24 42 0073, has applied for a lot size variance to allow foundation structural alterations to his dwelling, and WHEREAS, the City Code requires a 6,000 square foot lot area in the R-3 zoning district with the requirement under 23.404 (7) states that normal maintenance does not include structural repairs, and WHEREAS, the parcel lot area is 4,273~square feet, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of this variance to afford the property owner reasonable use of his land. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA; That the City Council does hereby concur with the Planning Commission recommendation to approve the lot size variance to allow structural alteration to the foundation of the dwelling at 2919 Holt Lane, Lot 4, Block 6, Minnesota Summer Baptist Assembly Case No. 83-269 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Planning Commission Agenda of December 12, 1983: Board of Appea)s Case No. 83-269 Location: 1932 Shorewood Lane Legal Desc.: Lots 8 & 9, Block 2, Shady- wood Point Request: Subdivision (lot-split) Zoning District: R-1 Applicant Lou Beasley 1932 Shorewood Lane Mound, MN. 55364 Phone: 472-3304 The applicant, Mr. Beasley, is requesting to sell off 15 feet of Lot 8 to his neighbor. The lot area of his parcel would be 12,180.5 square feet and the neighboring parcel lot area would be 9,460.75 square feet. He is also requesting a waiver of the subdivision requirements and a variance to the accessory utility building setback requirements. The City ordinance for the R-1 Zoning District requires )0,000 square foot parcel size and a 60 foot minimum lot width. The lot width required would be met. The )ot area would exceed the required on one parcel and be within 10% of the required lot size on the other parcel. The setbacks to the lot line for the utility building (boathouse) would have a zero foot sideyard setback. The required accessory building setbacks Section 23.407(5)(a) to the side yard is 4 feet and 4 feet to the rear lot line. The City Code requires two off street parking spaces. The subdivision of the parcel would eliminate one stall. The owner, Mr. Beasley, should provide another parking ~tall on his new parcel; total area required is 325 square feet times 2 spaces = 650 square feet. Recommend: The abutting neighbors have been notified. Staff recommends the subdivision of the parcel and that the utility building would require another variance approval if any structural modifications are planned for the building before building permits would be allowed. Also, anothe~ extension of the offrstreet parking area should be made on the Lot 9 and Lot 8, except the.NWly. 15 feet thereof to provide an area of 650 square feet.or an agreement with the new owner of the adjacent lot.' I Jan Bertrand Building Official JB/ms Planning Commission Hinutes December 12, 1983 - Page 2 Case No. 83-269 Subdivision (Lot,split), 1932 Shorewood Lane Lots 8 & 9, Block 2, ShadywOod Point - Lou Beasley and Danny Johnson were present. The Building Inspector explai, ned applicant is requesting to sell 15 feet to the adjoining neighbor, Danny Johnson. Lot 7 and the 15 feet Mr. Johnson is buying from Mr. Beasley.would give him 9,460.75 square feet of lot area so that his lot is closer to'conforming size (within'lO% of the 10,OO0 square feet required for a building site). There is a cabin on Lot 7 which Mr. John- son plans to tear down and build a new house. The remaining portion of Lot 8 and 9 has a boat house which would have a zero foot sideyard setback. The required setbacks for accessory building are 4 foot sideyard, 4 foot to rear lot line and the setback requirement from the mean high water elevation for accessory building floor, has to be 3 feet above flood elevation; but there is gravel in building and no floor. Building is in good condition. Mr. 8easley stated he plans.to build a. garage in the future and at that time, he would be wi)ling to take down boathouse. Needs it for storage now. Discussed that replacing summerl cabin with year around house is commendable. Also discussed briefly that the off-street parking area would be worked out. Byrnes moved and Vargo seconded a motion tolrecommend that the subdivision be approved with the stipulation that if any structure) changes or additions be made to Lot 8 except the NWly 15 feet and Lot 9, Block 2, Shadywood Point, it.would come back to the Planning Commission and further that the required off-street parking be provided. The vote was unanimously in favor. CiTY C: MOUND APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND LAND CASE NO. 83-269 FEE $ -~' ~ O FEE OWNER PLAT PARCEL Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: ZONING /r~ [ To be divided as follows: (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR..: New Lot No. From Square feet TO Square feet Reason: ' APPLICANT ~'"'~'~"(" (signature)" Applicant's interest in the property: TEL. NO. DATE This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DATE --. I h~rcb'.' r.,;r1,iY-,' t,::;~ ,.,:,:'.z .~' ~; ---. ocr,":.'*. .. re:::":: .... ,.: :,2-.:: ¢. ,; .... ....-.-,--.,- r,:'_ t".:c !5 feet thereof, :~nd Let 5, ~ork__ ~., "£ha,::.~.:::.c :..~.:'~,:' H.~r::.,;:.ir County. Ffnn" ,:nd %he iec~ticn ~f all ex~%...~ . .~ not pt:r.r~rt tc -~o'~' ct,bet ir. orov(;ments ',r , r~ .... ·' Certificate of Surwey for De.n~is Johnzor in '2~ts 7 ~,r~d 6, Bi¢rk .~, $:-~.j.-::od Point ./ r¢%~/Ooo/ ~.~. ~ oe CASE NO. 83-269 3,0¢/ PROPOSED RESOLUTION Case #83-269 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE THE FINAL SUBDIVISION FOR LOTS 7, 8, 9, BLOCK 2, SHADYWOOD POINT PID#'S 18-117-23 23 OOlO AND 18-117-23 23 0009 WHEREAS, the fina:l subdivision of Lots 7, 8, 9, Block 2, Shadywood '. Point, has been submitted in the manner required for platting of land under the City of Mound Ordinance Code, Section 22.00 and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutues and all proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder, and x WHEREAS, said subdivision is consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and ordin- ance of the City of Mound, and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a waiver of the subdivision requirements contained in Section 22.00 of the City Code, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommends approval subject to conditions, and WHEREAS, it is hereby determined that there are special circumstances affecting said property such that the strict applicati:on of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his ]and; that the waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; and that granting the waiver will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the other property owners. NOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT~ OF MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the request of Mr. Lou Beasley, for the waiver from the provisions of Section 22.00 of the City Code for platting of land and the request to subdivide property of less than five acres, described as PID# 18-117-23 23 0010/0009 Lots 7, 8, 9, Block 2, Shadywood Point (1932 Shorewood Lane), is hereby granted to permit division of the property in 'the fo]lowing manner: a. LOT AREA= 12,180.5 sq. ft. A. Lot 8, except the Northwesterly 15 feet thereof, and Lot 9, Block 2, Shadywood Point, Hennepin County, MN. to be one (1) parcel b. Lot 7, and the Northwesterly 15 feet of Lot 8, Block 2, Shadywood Point LOT AREA= 9,460.75 sq. ft. B. That any and all deficiencies be paid in full or waivers signed on parcels due to subdivisions. That any structural alterations or additions to Lot 8, except the NWly. 15 ft, and Lot 9, Block 2, Shadywood Point would require variance approval before permits would be issued. Do That an agreement be filed from the neighbor to provide off-street parking ~xx~x~x~xk~§x~x~x~x~x~x~x be filed with the City or on-site parking area of 650 sq. ft. be provided. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to supply a certified copy of this Resolution to the above named owners and subdividers after completion of the requirements, for their use as required by M.S.A. 462.358. Fo This final subdivision shall be filed and recorded within 180 days of the date of the adoption of this resolution in the Office of the Register of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County to show compliance with~ " CITY of MOUND -14-83) 1. George Kinser, 28/~8 Highland Bl'vd'. 472-2436 . ~" Bill Meyer, 6601 Bartlett Blvd. 472-6481 Jeff Edwardson, 1701 Avocet Lane 472-tl715 [ 4. John Thoresen, 3r., 2845 Fairfield Road 472-6883 '~~~6' Rc~bert M. Byrnes, 2851 Cambridge Lane 472-1615 ?~ . Geoff Michael, 1713 Avocet Lane 472-4216 1-14-83 1 12. Frank Weiland, 6045 Aspen Road Jeff Bishop, 1758 Sumach Lane Nancy Clough, 5132 Waterbury Lane Mauric~ D. Miller, 4378 Wilshire Blvd. Ernest Strong, 4934'Crestview Road Don Westman, 5716 Lynwood.Boulevard 472-1'171 472-5456 472-6682 72-504S 472-1667~.~ 472-3350 53~1 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 Ranking (Scale 1-5) 2-8-83 A letter is being sent to persons we have not heard from on thi.s list. Factors for consideration in ranking: Knowledge, experience Residential location Interest Availability for meetings Philosophy of Land-Use Planning and Zoning TO: FROM: SUBJECT: INTEROFFICE Jon Elam Chief Bruce Wold Purchase of Police Car MEMO DATE December 8, 19j[ I have attached a purchase order for the purchase of a 1984 Ford from Brookdale Ford. Brookdale Ford won the bid from the Hennepin County Purchasing group. The price of the car is $2,000 higher than last year. I was shocked when I discovered the price rise from last year. The only explanation I can offer for the price increa'se is the volume of business the car manufacturers are doing this year. I don't think the-manufacturers offered any incentive to the dealers this year. I recommend the City purchase the car under this bid beCause I don't believe we can do better On our own, and we are in dire need of a new car for the police fleet. I would like to hand deliver the purchase order to Brookdale Ford on December 9, 1983. ~BILL ~ CITY of MOUND MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 · (612) 472-1155 PURCHASE ORDER ' 4005 NO. DATE REOUESTED DATE PAID VENDOR ADDRESS [-' CHECK NO. AMOUNT OF CHECK Brookdale Ford, Inc. 7-500 County Rd. 10 .~_~m?polis, ~ 55430 L / VENDOR NOTE: THE CITY IS EXEMPT FROM [~AYMENT OF ALL FEDERAL EXCISE TAXES AND STATE SALES TAX (#802-4096). PAYMENTS ARE ISSUED PURSUANT TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL AFTER THE SECOND AND FOURTH TUESDAY EACH MONTH. UNIT QUANTITY DESCRIPTION PRICE AMOUNT CODE lO: 1 1984 Ford LTD Cro~ ¥ictor~a S 4 door $10~538.0~ Dk Blue with white door and top 95.8 ] (Add special paint) 510.655.80 4500 DATE: 12-08-'83 TRANS- ACTION DEBIT CREDIT AMOUNT BATCH MANAGE~: DATE: DESCRIPTION CHECK:NO. White*Vendor Copy Yellow-Dept Copy Blue-Receiving Copy Pink-Accounting Copy -~ DATE: TO: FROM: · SUBJECT: November 18, 1983 HENNEPIN COUNTY PURCHASING NOTICE OF AWARD A contract has been established as follows: CONTRACT NO ~ ...................... 3819 TITLE ................................ POLIC£ CARS CONTRACT PERIOD .................. PURCI-IASE ORDER CUT-OFF DATI: .... December 20, 1983 ~~-Xi~I~/DELIVERY DATE ........ February 21, 1984 - March 20, 1984 HENNEPIN COUNTY BUYER ........... No. 1 Name FRANK GERLING Phone 348-3885 HENNEPIN'COUNTY VENDOR NO ...... 20985 VENDOR NAME ....................... ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP .................. CONTACT PERSON ................... Gary Malott ITEMS AWARDED ............ .......... All I. tems BROOKDALE FORD, INC. 2500 County Road 10 ' Mpls., MN 55430 '. Phone 561-5500 None Net 30 days + 3% over 30 days Cooperative purchasing members not named in ADD'L DISCOUNTS OFFERED .......... TERMS OF PAYMENT .................. OTHER INFORMATION ............... the specifications can purchase by obtaining contractor's permission. CONTRACT NO. 3819 PROPOSAL OF BROOKDALE FORD, INC. Quote price's or furnish information for the following items: Parts and Service Manuals: Ougte unit price below for parts and gervtcm manuals for each item. EPA Mileage Rating: State rating below for each item bid. Delivery Date: State delivery date below for orders placed by December 20, 1983. (See Paragraph 8.) A. Mid-Size Police Sedan, 4-door Manuals: Parts .................... $ '25.00 .. Service ' $ 24.95 Mileage Rating: City .................... Highway ................... Combined .................. 20 Delivery Date .................. 60 - 90 days ARO B. Full-Size ~olice Sedan, 4-door Manu~is: Parts .................... S 25.00 Service ................... $ 30.00 Mileage Rating City ' 14 Highway ................... 24 17 Combined .................. Delivery Date .................. 60 - 90 .days ARO Discount for payment within twenty (20) days .............. -0- ** Amount of discount if performance bond is waived ........... -O- NET DUE 30 DAYS, + 3% OVER 30 DAYS Page 2 of 3 BROOKDALE FORD, INC. 2500 County Road 10 Telephone: (6!2) 561-5500 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55430 November 1, 1983 BID Hennepin County - Contract No. 3819 DETAILED EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS: We offer in response to the published call for bids, equipment as specified below. We certify that this equipment is mew, manufacturer's current model year production, and that said equipment will be furnished with all standard equipment, except as modified by optional equipment, as detailed below. This offering constitutes 100% of our bid, and it is intended that this document become part and parcel of our bid. ITEM NO. A: 1984 Ford LTD Sedan 4' door; 105.6 w.b. 2.3L Police package Heavy duty automatic overdrive transm/ssion with 1st gear lockout External oil cooler 60 Amp alternator Calibrated speedometer, 120 MPH Police package cooling radiator , Extra heavy duty battery, 77 amp with heat shield Power brakes, with semi-metallic linings police handling package; extra heavy duty fron & rear springs Extra control shock absorbers Heavy duty front and rear stabilizer bars Heavy duty upper front arm bushings Heavy duty front cloth individual seats P205/70R x 14 BSW police radial tires 5.5 Hesvy duty wheels Power steering oil cooler Remote control electric deck lid release Dual beam map light Heavy duty frame Bright hub caps Single key locking Day/night interior mirrors Air conditioner Heavy duty floor mats front & rear Tinted glass Light group police only Rear window defroster Power windows Interval wipers 11/1/83 ~ennepin County Bid - Contract #3819 age 3 AM radio Air conditioner Heavy duty floor mats, front & rear Tinted glass Light group police only Rear window defroster Power windows · Power door locks Tilt wheel Interval wipers Cigarette lighter Cars keyed alike Left hand spotlight Right hand remote mirrors Split bench seats Ail vinyl seat trim Bumper guards front & rear Inside hood release OPTIONS: Net Sale Price ..... $10,538.00 ea. Add for bucket seats ................. $108.00 Add for bucket seats, all vinyl ...... $136.85 llAdd for locking differential ......... $ 79.90 Add for special tutone paint option..$ 95.80 Add for right hand spotlight ......... $ 58.53 Add for AM/FM radio .................. $ 98.35 Delete for power windows ............. minus $228.44 Delete for power door locks .......... minus $142.40 Delete for.tilt wheel .............. ~..minus $ 92.20 f performance bond required ..... $2.45 per $1000.00 For BROOKDALE. FORD, INC. Gary Malott Fleet Sales Representative GM: gso NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF MOUND ADOPTION OF 1984 FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING BUDGET The City Council of the City of Mound will conduct a public hearing on December 20, 1983, at 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall, 5341Maywood Road,'Mound, Minnesota, to review and adopt the 1984 Federal Revenue Sharing Budget Proposed Uses Include: Wetlands Survey Depot Upgrading Commons Maintenance Small Pick-Up Truck - Park Dept. Summer Maintenance Help Spring & Fall Clean-Up Mini-Computer ElectEonic Letter Opener $ 3,000 10,OOO 5,ooo 8,ooo 5,ooo 12,OOO 6,OOO 1,OOO TOTAL $ 50,000 Citizens interested in commenting on this are urged to attend this meeting. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk Publish in The Laker December 6, 1983 Date: To: From: Re: CITY of MOUND October 21, 1983 Jon Sharon Revenue Sharing Status as of September 30, 1983 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 Attached is a Revenue Sharing Fund Statement of Revenue over Expenditures as of September 30, 1983. As of September 30, 1983, we had a balance of $6188.31. Balance as of 9/30/83 Est. additional revenue Designated Expenditures: Codification Commons 6188.31 26000.00 15000.00 5000.00 Estimated Balance as of 12/31/83 12188.31 I have included only about $3000 as interest income for 1983. This is way down from projections because we spent the money sooner than anticipated last year when doing 1983 projections. CITY OF MOUND REVENUE SHARING FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1983 Revenues Federal Grant Miscellaneous Interest Total Revenue Expenditures Trailer Civil Defense Siren Clean-up & Tree Removal Codification Commons Maintenance Stairway Dredge Priest Bay Dredge Emerald Lake Mobile Radio Squad Car Dump Truck Trash Barrels City Hall Roof Chemlawn Widmer-Prior Year Expense Air Com-Radio & Talk Around Ball Field Improvement Ladder Float For Bluffs Beach Two Radios for Public Works Basketball Court-Brookton Park Revenue Sharing Hearing Notice Total Expenditures Revenue Over (Under) Expenditures Fund Balance - January 1 Fund Balance - December 31 BUDGET 45762.00 200.00 10000.00 55962.00 2000.00 10000.00 15000.00 10000.00 500.00 7500.00 3O000.O0 75000.00 ~19038.00 77151.84 58113.84 ACTUAL 22764.00 387.00 23151.00 2000.00 9942.60 176.81 605.60 3000.00 1400.00 5005.60 525.00 17079.64 28940.33 1392.20 20095.15 1584.00 1128.00 431.00 1685.00 595.90 1969.00 1558.52 5.78 9411~.53 -70963.53 77151.84 6188.31 BALANCE 22998.00 187.00 10000.00 32811.00 -2000.00 2000.00 57.40 14823.19 4994.40 -25.00 -9579.64 1059.67.. -1392.20.. -20095.15 -1584.00 -1128.00 -431.00 -1685.00 -595.90 -1969.00 -1558.52 -5.78 -19114.53 'McCOMB$-KNUT$ON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS · LAND SURVEYORS · PLANNERS December 6, 1983 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Mr. 3on Elam City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: Map of Water Distribution System Mound, Minnesota #70-9999-4 Dear Oon: As you are aware the City of Hound does not have a reproducible map of the water distribution system. I visited with public works and reviewed the draw- ings they have on file in attempting to estimate the time required to produce a good map. They do have fairly good record drawings from the original construc- tion for the Three Roints and Island Rark areas. Record construction drawings for the Highlands and Dutch Lake area are not available from what we can determine. The remainder of the City is only partially covered. Using what appears to be available we have attempted to furnish you with the best estimate possible for drafting of a water distribution map. That estimated cost is $4,128.00, broke down as follows: Technician (meet with 'public works and search records) Drafting Supervision 20 hours ® $30. O0/hour $ 600.00 100 hours ~ $30. O0/hour 12 hours ® $44.00/hour $3,000.00 $ 528.00 If the final cost should be less than the above estimate, then the City would be billed for our actual time. If you have any questions or need addi- tional information, please contact us. Sincerely, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. JC:j McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC , CONSULTING ENGINEERS · LAND SURVEYORS · PLANNERS Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 November 10, 1983 Mr, Oon Elam City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: Wetland Ordinance Elevation of OHW Mound, Minnesota #70-9999-4 Dear Oon: As per our discussion on Wednesday, we are submitting the following recom- mendations and our estimate for surveying services. 'We have reviewed the letter from Ooel Settles of the Hennepin'Soil and Wa- ter Conservation District, a copy of which is attached. We would suggest that someone such as 3oel be the person to designate the "ordinary high water mark" (OH~) in the field by placement of a few lath around each designated wetlands. After this is accomplished, our survey crew could shot the elevations and establish a mean elevation for the OHW of each wetland. This elevation could then be placed on the wetland maps and become a part of the ordinance. We do not feel it would be necessary for the City to spend the extra monies to locate this elevation line on the maps. Any development request submitted to the City would be required to show elevations and this could be compared in the normal plan review. We estimate our fee at $2500 to $3000 for determining the OH~ elevation and indicating these elevations on the wetlands maps. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact US. Sincerely, Mc~MBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, Inc, 3~ohn~ame~~on~-z'cr'-~ JC: ' Enclosure Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District 250 North Central Avenue, Suite 109 - Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 - Telephone (612) 473-0249 October 27, 1983 Ms. Jan Bertrand Building Inspector City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Jan: I am enclosing a pamphlet from the Department of Natural Resources regarding their Protected Waters and Wetland Permit Program. The City of Mound's wetland or- dinance is patterned after the state's permit program. The boundary of protected waters and wetlands for regulatory purposes is defined by the "ordinary high water mark" (0HW). The 0HW is the elevation delineating the highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape. Generally it is the point where the natural vegetation changes from predomin- ately aquatic to predominately terrestrial (See sketch in pamphlet). To facilitate enforcement of local wetland ordinances I recommend establishing the actual elevation of the 0HW as feet above sea level. The elevation of the 0HW for each wetland can then be used for regulatory purposes in review of site development plans, etc. If you have additional questions don't hesitate to call me. ~ C. Settles District Limnologist JCS:iw Enclosure 1o8 Delinquent water and sewer 12-14-83 22 232 2208 O1 22 235 2401 41 22 235 2460 O1 22 238 4898 31 22 238 5035 11 22 253 2017 11 22 253 2051 O1 22 256 4782 11 22 259 4949 O1 22 259 4978 91 22 259 5237 91 22 259 5872.32 22 259 6070 31 22 262 2997 51 22 262 3120 31 22 265 3053 91 22 271 2919 O1 22 277 5853 51 22.280 5928 91 22 283 5900 21 22 286 5949 21 22 286 6040 91 22 292 6O23 31 22 292 6033 21 22 301 2910 4~ 22 310 2630 91 22 310 2675 41 22 310 2710 91 22 310 3148 12 22 310 3198 61 22 316 2882 31 22 337 5932 91 22 343 2281 21 22 346 5667 21 $ 49.6O 81.90 61.14 121.9o ~6o,oo 140 ~o.~ 75.16 60.40 68.36 110.20 143.3o 143.4o 99.48 61.4o 49.70 102.98 88.OO ~L g7.~O -14r8=8~ ~1,o0 71.46 ~32.90 71.15 182.t0- 159.00 147.50 109.97 63.56 139.56 108.65 96.63 110.98 81o? 22 355 557~ O1 22 373 5028 11 22.376 2340 61 22 385 5O70 71 22 588 '5061 O1 22 404 5092 O1 $ 51.48 47' 4 136.01 $3979.53 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 Date: December 15, 1983 To: Jon Elam From: Sharon Legg Re: Sewer Rates for 1984. I have attached the work-up on sewer rates that I have prepared. a presentation of rates---what they.would be if :bhey wer~e: I gave 1) 2) 3) 4) $18.00 for a minimum of lO,O00 and $1.20/1,000 over the minimum $20.00 for a minimum of lO,O00 and $1.25/1,000 over the minimun $21.00 for a minimum of 10,O00 and $1.38/!,000 over the minimun $25.50 for a minimum of 10,000 and $1.70/1,000 over the minlmun I't's'rather confusing, I admit, but I'll walk you through it. I am recommending we set rates at $21.00 for a minimum of 10,O00 and $1.38/1,000 gallons over the minimum. This is about a 16% increase over our present rates (#1 above). This should be sufficient to get us by until we see what effect Tonka's departure has on MWCC bill to us. Also attached are: 1. Sewer Fund Balance Sheet as of 9/30/83. 2. Sewer Fund Statement of Revenues & Expenses as of 9/30/83. 3. Misc. Statistics on our Utility System. 4. Area City Sewer Rates. 5. Sample Resolution AS CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA SEWER FUND BALANCE SHEET OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1~83 AND 1~82 Cash Accounts receivable Accounts receivable Taxes receivable Special Assessments Prepaid Expense Fixes Assets Less ASSETS - customers receivable Accumlated Depreciation TOTAL ASSETS 1983 $ 192,745 437,892 50,723 0 2,216 0 683,576 3,046,207 3,729,783 1982 58,663 5o8,455 31,483 26,797 647 19,277 645,322 3,o98,818 3,744,14o LIABILITIES AND Current Liabilities · Accounts payable -.MWCC Accounts payable - Sac Charges Accounts payable - Benefits FUND EQUITY Deferred Revenue Fund Equity Reserved for encumbrance Contributed capital Retained earnings TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 9,995 2,524 7,816 20,335 0 401 4,375 3,704,672 3,709,448 3,729,783 O 1,687 3,311 4,998 486,425 0 4,75O 3,247,967 $ 3,252,717 $ 3,744,140 3)1,,2., CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA .SEWER FUND STATEMENT OF.REVENUES OVER EXPENSES 1983 1982 Operating Revenues Sewer Sales - billed Sewer sales - unbilled Penalties Budge~ Actual $ 503,358 $ 309,869 50,723 5,287 Actual $ 248,555 31,483 4~201 Total Operating Revenue 503,358 $ 365,879 284,239 Operating Expenses Personal services Supplies and repair materials Professional services Communications Printing and legal publications . Insbrance Utilities Repair and maintenance Logis Disposal charges Miscellaneous Depreciation 'Total _Operating Expenses Operating Income (Loss) ,$ 74,989 $ 62,600 10,94o 6,248 1,785 5,747 3,391 902 25O 10 6,968 3,O55 16,397 15,560 12,7OO 14,379 5,110 3,785 382,942 288,002 350 65 52,811 39,233 568,633 $ 439,586- (65,275) $ (73,707) 43,812 8,151 2,203 2,022 79 4,140 11,233 17,535 3,574 186,714 201 39,228 318,892 (34,653) Non-Operating Revenue Taxes Permits Connection Charges Interest on special assessments Interest from MWCC 'Miscellaneous Total Non'operating Revenue Net Income (Loss) $ 'i,o32 6OO 8,562 17,0OO 12,749- 5,000 403 21,000 $ 23,346- (44,275) $ (50,361) 49,337 2,460 71 .54 52,111 17,458 :;etained Earnings January 1 _- $3,755,434 $3,230,509 ;~,.~tcine~ Earnings September 30 $3,705,073 $3,247,967 (1) The method of reporting MWCC changed from 1982 to 1983. The entire cost for treatment is shown as an expense and the credits no longer net out. The credits ere recognized as a revenue at the end of 1982. See the 1982 financial statements. o 0 0 0 ~-~ oooooo ~o o° ~ ~ CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA WATER AND SEWER BILLING STATISTICS AS OF DECEMBER 15, 1983 ~ingle family dwellings Duplexes Three unit dwellings Four unit dwellings Five to ten unit dwellings 11-19 unit dwellings 20-49 unit dwellings 50 units or more Mobile home parks Other i. ncl~ commercial, medical, etc. BUILDINGS 2963 29 3 13 2 11 2 4 1 97 Total: 3125 LIVING UNITS 2963 58 9 52 13 148 87 348 15 QUARTERLY BILLINGS Single Units* Number Percent 1043 34.5 1211 4O.O 550 18.2 147 4.9 53 1.8 2O .6 Multiple Units (2-4 units) Number Percent 6 18.8 12 37.5 5 15.6 5 15.6 4 12.5 0 3024 IO0.0 32 * Includes some small businesses IOO.0 Cons umpt i on O-10 11-20 21-30 31-4O 41-5O 5] & over MONTHLY BILLINGS Single Units 6 5 3 O 0 lO 24 Multiple Unit Accounts 8 8 3 2 13 34 Consumption 0-12 13-20 21-30 31-40 51 & over AREA CITIES' SEWER RATES AS of December 15, 1983 Blommington Brooklyn Center Excelsior Hopkins Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Mound Orono Richfield Spring Park St. Louis Park Flat rate or chg foe th~ minimun 5 20.93 Res. 5 21.25 Comm. 5 No 5 18~35/13,OOO $ No $ 12.75/15,OOO $ 15.00/10,000 5 18.00/10,000 $ 40.85 5 2.35 Ser Chg 5 15.00/5,000 5 14.45/12,000 Rate over minimun None Increace anticipated? ? \ Possibly in March 84 5 .95/1OOO $ .95/1OOO $1.40/1OOO Yes 5 .85/lOOO 5 .90/1000 $1.20/10OO None 5 .78/lOOO 52.35/1OOO 51.19/1OO0 Yes Yes, $19.25/13,OOO and $1 over the min No Yes Our present rates Yes, to 542.90 Yes, to 5 .82/1OO0 No winter quarter! CODE 4100 4112 4130 4132 4144 4151 4152 4210 4214 4220 4221 4224 4230 4233 4234 4310 4313 4321 4322 4350 4351 4360 4361 4371 SEWER Salaries, Reg. Overtime, Reg. Salaries, Temp. Premi~n PERA/FICA Hosp./Dental Life Ins./Disability Office Supplies Copy Machine & Fees Operating Supplies Motor Fuels Clothing & Uniforms Repair & Maint. Supplies Building Repair Street Maint. Materials Professional Services Audit & Financial Postage Telephone Printing Legal Publication Worker's Compensation Ins. Gen. Liability Insurance Electricity 600-78 1983 1983 1984 APPROVED PROJECTED PROPOSED 55818 70127 47289 4000 2735 400(k 2000 1478 2000 0 . 168 0 7298 12930 6411 5209 6092 4150 664 686 510 200 124 200 0 162 100 700 508 500 3500 .2460 3000 340 354 338 5500 4371 5000 200 300 200 500 500 500 500 3500 2000 1285 1167 1250 1500 1200 1250 1891 0 525 150 150 150 100 100 100 5468 7805 4210 1500 2000 2000 14325 22000 25000 CODE 4372 4375 4380 4395 4411 4413 .4418 4423 4551 4713 SEWER Gas Service Garbage Repair & Maint. Cont. Central Equip. Rental Conferences & Schools Dues & Subscriptions Depreciation Expense Waste Disposal - MWCC Office Furn. & Equip. ShoPs & Stores TOTAL EXPENSE 600-78 1983 1983 1984 APPROVED PROJECTED PROPOSED 2000 2366 2500 72 72 75, 12000 7000 10000 5110 5110 5520 300 300 300 50 50 50 52811 52840 53840 313065 396269 402307 100 100 100 700 700 700 498856 605724 586075 RESOLUTION NO. 83- RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 1984 SEWER RATE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 20.10 of the City Code of the City of Mound, the rates and charges for use and service of the sanitary sewer system are to be established by resolution; and WHEREAS, the last rate increase took effect January 1, 19U2, per Resolution #81-404 amended by Resolution #82-308; and x WHEREAS, it is necessary for sewer rates to be raised based on projections of revenues and expenses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby increases the sewer rates as follows effective the first billing in January 1984. RESIDENTIAL QUARTERLY CHARGE Quarterly sewer charge For 10,000 gallons or less ~],~O minimum All over 10,000 gallons, per 1,000 gallons /, ~ Minimum Quarterly Bill ~ Note: The above minimum applies to each single family dwelling or apartment which is in accordance with existing Sewer Dept. policy. COMMERCIAL, INCLUDING LARGE APARTMENTS MONTHLY CHARGES Monthly Sewer Charges (Large Users) For 3,000 gallons or less All over 3,000 gallons, per 1,000 gallons Note: Minimum Monthly Bill per Apt. 7.00 minimum /, 3g Single Family Dwelling - The sewer rate shall be based on the actual usage or the first quarter actual water usage, whichever is less. Two-Family Usage and Multiple Dwelling Usage - Is computed on the same basis as a single dwelling, except that the total quarterly charge on all such properties shall not be less than the number of units multiplied by the ~0~O per month, minimum charge per unit. Water used but not placed into the sanitary sewer may be deducted providing it is metered. Dwellings Connected to Sewer but not Connected to Municipal Water - Shall pay a quarterly rate of _~~. If such users wish to pay sewer rates based on gallons of ware" used, they can pur'chase a water meter from the City an 3//? have their own plumber install the meter on their well. Commercial and Industrial - The quarterly sewer rate is based on the actual amount of water used each month on the same cost scale as residential (see above). Water used but not placed in to the sanitary sewer may be deducted providing it is metered. Availability Charge - All dwellings not connected to the sanitary sewer must pay an availability charge of ~ per quarter whether occupied or vacant. Late Fee Penalty - For all bills not paid on or before the due date specified on the bill, a 10% late fee will be added. 2 PRESENTATION BEFORE THE CITIZENS COMMISSION ON THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION REMARKS BY BILL JOYNES, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE AND THE METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission: Thank you for inviting me to appear before you tonight. I am here representing the City of White Bear Lake as a constituent community of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, and also the Metropolitan Area Management Association (MAMA), an association made up of the chief administrative officers of some sixty suburban communities. I currently serve as the chairman of MAMA's General Labor Relations Committee, which has responsibility for the over- all conduct of joint negotiations in the metropolitan communities represented. I wish to speak to two concerns this evening. First and most obvious is the fact that I represent a suburban community whose .sewer rates have increased over 400 percent in the last ten years. That 400 percent is difficult for us to comprehend, given the fact that our flowage rates have not increased dramatically during that same period of time. Secondly, I am here because my community and a great number of other communities in the metropolitan area have heard for years about the excessive wages and fringe benefits being paid by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. As chairman of the MAMA General Labor Relations Committee, I am parti- cularly sensitive to this issue because it has and continues to have an effect on the conduct of labor relations in the metropolitan area. Those of us in public management who have responsibility.for positions similar to those employed by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission are sensitive to the differences in wage scales and con- duct a continuous battle to keep those wages at a manageable level. Rather than reiterate a series of horror stories about the compensation structure at the MWCC, I would like to deal in verifiable facts. What I will attempt to do this evening is to give you two very simple and general comparisons, which will graphically show you the differences between an employee of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and a similar pesition employed by our member communities. The positions chosen for comparison are (1) Accounting Clerk II vs. MAMA's Senior Accounting Clerk~ and (2) Interceptor Sewer Lead Man with the Waste Control Commission and MAMA's Main- tenance Man II Sewer Lead Man. The positions were chosen because they are common positions in most of the MAMA communities and job content and responsibilities of the positio~ are similar. Essen- tially, the comparison will show the cost of a body of work being performed at MWCC as related to the same body of work in our member communities. Before I begin, perhaps a word is necessary about the source of the figures you are about to see. I was successful several months-ago in obtaining copies of two contracts currently in effect at the Waste Control Commission. I might add that on many occa- sions in the last ten years, various City Managers have attempted to secure this type of information from the Waste Control Commis- sion.. Quite candidly, those requests have been flatly denied. Most recently I sent an intern to the Waste Control Commission to see if she could secure some additional information as background for this presentation, specifically a copy of the 1983 budget and, more importantly, a breakdown of the number of individuals employed in each job category and their wage rates. She was quite bluntly refused any information on these two items. I might add there was no suggestion that the information would be forthcoming atXa later date. It simply was not available and would not be made available. We are all obviously aware that the 5~etropolitan Waste Control Commission is a public agency and, as such, subject to the same public information laws that govern the rest of our organizations. It is beyond my comprehension that an agency of this importance would have the arrogance to deny information to representatives of the communities it serves. While the hesitancy of the ~WCC to provide information may 'be inappropriate and perhaps illegal, their reluctance to provide the data is almost understandable when one looks at the cost differences. As we proceed through the comparisons~ you might get a better feel as to why the Waste Control Commission is reluctant to hand over the information requested. In making the comparisons, I have made several assumptions which I think will give you a general picture of the difference in costs. In all cases I will assume we are talking about a 30-year employee working from age 30 to age 60. We will assume that all employees will receive the maximum benefits allowed by contract, and I will total those benefits in 1983 dollars so that we will not need to speculate on inflation rates. Additionally, we will make the assumption that an employee will live to the age of 80 which, according to statistics~ is fairly accurate for the State of Minnesota. In.calculating the figures attached, the method used was to take an employee's position and list under the contract what would be earned by that employee from the first year through the 30th year in the category of wages, sick leave, vacation, insurance, and any other special benefits. The comparisons for Position 1 and Position 2 follow. When looking. at the comparisons, a couple of things jump out. POSITION COMPARISON #1 MWCC ACCOUNT CLERK II - MAMA SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK M%¥CC ACCOUNT CLERK II 30 year wage total Annual Leave - 7098 hours Insurance (Life, ADD, LTD, Dental, Health) Supplemental Sick Leave (1560 hours) Add retiree insurance benefit $693,570 78~858 124~560 I7~331 $914,319 72~240 $986~559 -2- MAMA SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK 30 year wage total Vacation (4114 hours) Sick Leave (2880 hours) .Insurance (Health, Dental, Life) MWCC wage as percentage of MAMA Cities Rate (29) $519,455 34,228 23,961 50~220 $627,864 $986,559 / $627,864 = 157~ \ POSITION COMPARISON #2 INTERCEPTOR SERVICE WORKER LEADMAN - MAMA MAINTENANCE MAN II (LEADMAN) MWCC INTERCEPTOR LEADMAN 30 year wage total $859,768 Annual Leave - 7098 hours 97,952 Insurance (Life, ADD, LTD, Dental, Health) 124,560 Supplemental Sick Leave (1560 hours) 21,528 $1,103,808 Add retiree insurance benefit (age 60-80) 72~240 $1,176,048 MAMA MAINTENANCE MAN II LEADMAN 30 year wage total Vacation.(4114 hours) Sick Leave (2880 hours) Insurance (Health, Life, Dental) $693,490 45,788 32,054 50,220 $821,552 MWCC wage compared to MAMA Cities Rate 1,176,048 / 821,552 = 143~ First is the difference in the cost of the insurance programs for a MAMA employee vs. someone employed by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Aside from the fact that the wage rates Are higher and the annual leave is a bit more expensive, insurance rates are more than double what our suburban communities are paying. Particular in'~erest should be paid in both cases to what is listed as retiree insurance benefit. In contracts the Waste Control Commission has negotiated an employee who retires with a certain amount of service with the Commission is entitled to receive insurance benefits paid by the Waste Control Commission until that individual dies. This is a benefit that does not exist in any MAMA contracts and to my knowledge does not exist in other metro or state agencies. In total, you will note that in the case of the Accounting Clerk, that position is paid at 157% of the comparable position within MAMA communities. When'comparing the Interceptor Sewer worker, that figure is 143%. T~ere are several other important factors in the contract which I think deserve discussion. The first and most glaring difference -3- between our fringe benefits and those of the' Waste Control~Com- mission is the severance pay benefit. For both positions under the Waste Control Commission, there is the possibility that an individual could walk away with one year's salary as a severance benefit. In addition, you will note that it is also possible to retire a year early and use close to 2,200 hours of accrued leave, which would be in excess of the lump sum severance payment. This comes directly from the union contract and does say that employees will be required to take a minimum amount of leave time. This calculation assumes that minimum usage and assumes the maximum accrual over that period. You will note the differenca when compared to the severance programs currently in effect in most MAMA communities. Lump sum payments for the Senior Accounting Clerk are approximately $5,000 and the Maintenance Man II Leadman $6,700. As rich a program as this seems to be itself, there exists an even richer one in the contract 5IWCC has with Local 35 I.U.O.Eo In that particular contract, it is possible for a particular indi-. vidual to accrue and be paid in a lump sum benefit 3,520 hours of work time. Under that contract, in 1983 dollars, that would amount to a lump sum payment of $39,000 for the. lowest paid employee .covered by the agreement to a maximum of $49,000 for the highest paid position. 'SEVERANCE PAY BENEFIT MWCC AFSCME LOCAL'668 (Account Clerk II) Annual Leave (assume minimum usage) Total 7098 hrs. minus 2828 hrs. = 4280 hrs. One year restriction 2080 hrs.* MWCC AFSCME LOCAL 668 (IntercePtor Leadman) Annual Leave (assume minimum usage) Total 7098 hrs. minus 2828 hrs. = 4280 hrs. One year restriction 2080 hrs.* $23,117 lump sum $28,704 lump sum MAMA SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK AND MM II LEADMAN Vacation 200 hrs. Sick Leave 400 hrs. Senior Acc. Clerk MM II Leadman $1~664 $2,226 3,328 4,452 $4,992 $6,678 *It should be noted here that nothing in this contract restricts an employee from retiring early and using accumulated leave (2,200 hrs. possible) until leave is drawn down to the one year restricted level. Something that has been particularly frustrating for all of us is that when asked questions point blank, the Waste Control Commission has consistently given misleading information about issues of wages and fringe benefits. In fact, I understand that before this Commis- sion, representatives have stated that wages and fringes have been very comparable with Metro Area communities. Most reCently, when one of our representatives asked the personnel department at the M%¥CC for a comparison of fringe benefits as a percentage of wages an the MWCC operating budget, the reply was that fringe benefits -4- amounted to only 18~ of total wages being paid. This is quite frankly not the case. It is quite evident that the Waste Control Commission does not include a monetary figure for vacation, sick leave, and the employee's insurance benefit in those calculations. When ,those benefits are given a dollar amount, and indeed they should be with the type of monetized severance benefits available under the contracts, the fringe benefit cost as a percentage of wages jumped to around 50~. The comparable cost for the ~IAMA positions compared averages 30~. COMPARISON OF FRINGE BENEFITS AS PERCENTAGE OF WAGES MWCC ACCOUNT CLERK II Fringes, Leaves, Insurance, Retirement/Wages = 377,604/693,570 54.0% MWCC INTERCEPTOR LEADMAN Fringes, Leaves, Insurance, Retirement/Wages ~ 421,171/859,768 49.0~ MAMA SENIOR ACCOUNT CLERK Fringes, Leaves, Insurance, Retirement/Wages ~ 171,782/519,455 33.0~ MAMA MAINTENANCE MAN II LEADMAN Fringes; Leaves, Insurance, Retirement/Wages = 212,667/693,490 30.7~ Aside from the obvious direct dollar wage and fringe benefit costs, there are some other clauses in this contract which bear scru- tiny. The first is probably the most disturbing, even though it does not have a direct impact on the wages and fringes as negotiated, and is contained in an article entitled, "Sub-contracting Both in the AFSCME Contract and the Local 35 Contract." Simply stated, it says that the Waste Control Commission has the total authority to sub-contract all or a portion of the work performed by an employee under this agreement. This is a standard and necessary clause in all of our MAMA contracts and gives us the ability to compare and in some cases delegate work to the private sector which may be.per- formed at a cost savings. There is an additional phrase in both contracts with the MWCC that states that "should the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission decide to'sub-contract, it agrees that there will be no reduction in the number of employees covered by this agreement at the time of the sub-contracting." Obviously any' incentive to save money through sub-contracting is totally lost. Another disturbing element of their labor relations structure is evidenced by the AFSCME contract, Local 668. This particular document covers 62 separate job classifications. Both professional and non, professional workers are covered, as well as supervisors and those whom they supervise. Part of the ability to bargain -5- 0ffectively with employees that are considered non-essential (those that have the ability to strike) in the threat of taking and weathering such a strike. By the very nature of the struc- ture of these contracts, the Waste Control Commission has made it almost impossible for itself to manage effectively during a strike situation. In 1977, ~{AMA communities experienced a metro- wide strike in our Public Works departments. In almost all cases, we were able to cover essential services with supervisory employees. It is obvious by looking at the structure of the AFSCME contract with the Waste Control Commission that if a strike were to occur, there would be nobody there to run the systems, much less answer the phones. Certainly at a minimum, supervisors, and those they supervise should be placed in separate units. Finally, I think a word should be mentioned about the fact thai part of the problem with this very rich benefit package is that those same benefits are bargained and then enjoyed by the management staff at the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. In fact, I am sure you are aware of the newspaper articles written in the last year which talked about some of the top managers at 'the ~{WCC cashing out their accrued leaves at retirement, or in some cases actually cashing out accrued leaves during the course of their employment. We have experienced situations where members of the Waste Control Commission management have actually approached other metro agencies trying to sell this type of contract because it is such a good deal for the managers. One must wonder how committed these people are to good, effective financial adminis- tration of their work place. There are many less significant items in the contracts now in effect which make them far richer than the 5IAMA contracts. Sufficeth to say, they all have a bearing on a total package which in my experience is far in excess of the wages and fringes being paid in our communities, state, and metro agencies. Obviously, the biggest question is, "How did something like this happen?" It would be unfair to blame this situation on either labor or management. The blame must specifically rest with an organizational structure in which there are no checks and balances on the labor relations process and on the decision- making process in general. The Commission is very much aware that operating budgets at the Waste Control Commission are not even discussed at the Metropolitan Council level, that only capital budgets are ever discussed by that representative body. The Waste Control Commission itself does approve the operating budget each year, but from the information we have received, it is doubtful that even they have any concrete information on the types of personnel policies and compensation packages that are negotiated in any given year. I would be remiss if I did not also admit that the cities served by the Waste Control Commission bear some of the blame, because it is far too easy for us to pass through the increased costs ~f s~wer treatment. If any individual city has taken some action in the past, it has found it incredibly difficult to find -6- leverage with the Commission or its staff. We don't have any magic answers on how this situation can be improved, except to say that a structural change needs to be made that allows the clients of the Waste Control Commission better access to the decision-making process. The system should allow individual communities to be represented by Commissioners and we would hope give communities, singly or in groups, the ability to have some leverage over those Commissioners. We believe the Waste Control Commission to be an agency that is essentially a monopoly which is controlled neither by the political process nor by the market place. We think it is an agency that is out of control, that x has become arrogant and does basically what it pleases.. I think that the comparisons shown you as evidence indicate this t° be the case. On behalf of the MAMA communities and the City of White Bear Lake, I wish to thank you for the opportunity to present our feelings and wish the Commission well in its investigative responsibilities. If anyone has any questions, I would be glad to try to answer them at this time. SALARY PROPOSAL 1984 GENERAL FUND CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK FINANCE DIRECTOR SENIOR ACCOUNTING CLERK ACCOUNTING CLERK SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CLERK POLICE CHIEF POLICE OFFICER POLICE OFFICER POLICE OFFICER POLICE OFFICER POLICE OFFICER POLICE OFFICER POLICE OFFICER POLICE INVESTIGATOR POLICE SUPERVISOR OF PATROL POLICE SECRETARY BUILDING OFFICIAL ADM. ASSIST. TO BUILDING OFFICIAL STREET SUPERINTENDENT MAINTENANCE PERSON MAINTENANCE PERSON MAINTENANCE PERSON MAgNTENANCE PERSON 38,850 20,350 26,964 17,000 16,500 16,500 34,650 (VACANT) 28,680 28,680 28,680 28,680 28,680 28,642 23,880 32,376 31,140 17,415 22,000 19,425 24,752 23,296 23,296 23,296 20,029 PUBLIC wORKS SECRETARY CITY MECHANIC PARK DIRECTOR TOTAL 27 POSITIONS 16,786 23,296 24,752 668,595 ENTERPRISE FUNDS WATER & SEWER SUPERINTENDENT MAINTENANCE PERSON MAINTENANCE PERSON UTILITY BILLING CLERK MAINTENANCE PERSON LIQUOR STORE MANAGER LIQUOR STORE ASSISTANT MANAGER LIQUOR STORE CLERK 24,752 23,296 23,296 17,856 23,296 26,964 17,500 15,200 4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE C~T~ ATTORNEY TO COMMENCE LITIGATION AGAINST TONKA CORPORATION POR DELINQUENT SEWER C~lARGES WHEREAS, the City Finance Director did determine in the late summer or early fall of 1982 that the billing for one water meter and the sewage resulting from that meter had not been billed to the Tonka Corporation since March of 1978, and WHEREAS, the City staff immediately contacted the company who agreed that the City should commence billing for the water going into the sewer on the basis of 70% of the metered flow, it being estimated that 305 was going directly to Lake Minnetonka, and WHEREAS, Tonka Corporation has paid for the sewage coming from Water Meter No. 4 since September of 1982 on the basis of 70~ and the City staff has been negotiating with company representatives to cover the period from 1978 through 1982, and WHEREAS, offers of settlement have been made by the company and by the City but the amounts offered by the company are not acceptable to this Council, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Mound that the City Attorney be authorized and directed to immediately commence a lawsuit against the Tonka Corporation for sewer charges from March 14, 1978, through August 30, 1982, and to take whatever action is necessary under the terms of the ordinance to collect said funds. i t,.~h,du!j~gts- Ell(;nleors 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (612) 473-4224 December 12, 1983 Mr. Jon Elam, City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Booster Pump Station - A&K Construction Dear Jon: Enclosed herewith please find two (2) copies Of A&K,s-'Progress Estimate~N~3-~-~ for work performed on the above referenced project. This estimate has been checked, appears to be in order, and is being forwarded to you for your approval and subsequent payment. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES George W. Boyer~ GWB:js Enclosure TO General & Mechanical Contractors 9038 110th St. No. STILLWATER, MN 55082 (612) 426-1613 "E.A.' Hickok & Associates, Inc. 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 DATE J dOI NO. November 8. 1983 83-6-q0 ATTENTION ' - - ..Mr, George Boyer. P.E, RE: - - -- 1983. Water System Improvements Mound, Minnesota WE ARE SENDING YOU I~ Attached [] Under separate cover via E3 Shop drawings [] Prints ID Plans [] Copy of letter [] Change order [], [] Samples' the following items: [] Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 Partial Pay Estimate No. Three THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ~ For approval [] For your use [] As requested [] For review and comment E3 FOR BIDS DUE [-I Approved as submitted [] Approved as noted [] Returned for correctioqs 19¸ [] Resubmit, [] Submit [] Return copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints I-I PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS t~f3DV T~I UNiTI' CONTRACT AMOUNT ~: Excave - ."::~ 8';8oo. oo .. ?:' .- 565. O0 CarPentry·:- ~ " ;..2,950.00 RoOfing & Bheet'Meta] Doors3~'& Hardware-- R, ~0. O0 "2 ....... IH[ITl AMOUNT £ARNI~O ' :" '' : '' r 675.00 ' lC .... 677.00,:--. lC :..:.. %o:0o?:!:. -. -."8,800: oo'."."..: .i ( . . 3;005:00. ' - l: '. 565.00' -i '2,065.00':'. · '1 ":2,400.00.':' .' · ,: : ": ;'900.00.'_:;.'.: '1 0 i'224;'00 ":'.:'- · . 225', 6,200.00. ::' i . "4. 300'. O0 '.'. 1,601.00 '..1 $~5,872~00 WORK PERFORMED TO , INCL ?STATu'~'0F C'ONTRACT Original contract Amount {{;89.990,00 Extras approved to date Credits approx.,cd to date ' ' '.'.: Net amount of Contract thi~ dat~ ' '- #.. · ::. Certificate Of the Contractor or his dui), Authorized Representative ..' T6 the be~t:'~f .my knowledge and.belief, I cefiify that all items, units, quantifies and prices of work and material shown ,,'.. ' or~4 ~' me' "xace" ox' one°'--e~i No', .. 1 0 ' 'and . '2 ._of thia Periodical Estimate are correct; that all work h~ been ?i.!/"performed, i'anc[ ~at'e'rials supplied in' full accordance ~,ith .the terms and conditions of the corresponding constmctlon-i:on- '~i" chart es:th~reto,'that the following is a'tme and correct statement of the__contrap$ account up to, and including, the last. '"'- ~:.'( ".da.¥.~f' the: period .Covered. by this estimate, and. that.no part Of the "t~X~ ~rn~i//.due ,has. been ,eec,yea. '.~,,i-/":.((b') .;" Retained ,',. ?' ;J' ...'. :::.. ,:, :2,, .;., ~. ;~; ..,..,..; :~e.'t&' .,..,' -' '; ..... '..' "~' .' ".' ',./..' ":,' ': *~'~ · · · .i.}.L..:..:,; (c);'~'T0tal. C~ned le~' rc~ned pcrcen~ge. ;'; ,.-,:.,...ti."; .:. ;.,',.. ,,...,. , "~. ": ':,': ('" .... $ . · "i ;'(:~ (d) '.)Total .pmmousl~ '.,approved. '.. :; .. .... ';..., .;.;.:,, ,~.,'.... ........... ... .......... , 2~', 97 6.8} Superintendent of Construction Architect Appoved as to quantities and estimate due: ... Supervising Engineer 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (612) 473-4224 December 12, 1983 Mr. Jon Elam, City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 'Re: Standpipe - Webco Tank, Inc. Dear Jon: Enclosed herewith are two (2) copies of Webco Tank, Inc. Invoice No. 5713 for work performed on the above referenced project. This invoice has been checked and approved as noted. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Ge~o~ge 7 Boyer ~ GWB:js Enclosure CC: Mr. D.L. Stites, General Manager Webco Tank, Inc. P.O. Box 1206' Sapulpa, Oklahoma 74066 IINC O1~ I~ O I~,A"I" ',: I~ P.O. BOX 120~ * SAPULPA, OKLAHO,M.~ 740~:~ SAPULPA 918--22,1.6232 Please Remit To: WEBCO TANK, INC. Dept. #42 Tulsa, OK 74'182 City of Mound, Minnesota SOLD. C/O George Boyer, Hickok & Assoc. TO . 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, MN 55391 L DATE: 11/23/83 ,Nvo,c ' ' 5 CUSTOMER ORDER NO: CONTRACT DATE; JOB NO.:2654 To invoice you for progress on water tank at Mound, Minnesota through 11/26/83 as follows: Foundation & earthwork 95% $30,600 $ 29,070.00 Materials on tank 100% 33,015 33,015.00 Tank Erection ~100~ 30,813 30,813.00 Painting ~ 1'2,950' Cathodic Protection 3,950 Electrical 70% .5,900 4,130.0u TOTAL EARNED .TO DATE LESS: Retainage @ 10% $-S~,SGO.20 LESS: Previous/Invoices 88,652.70 TOTAL DUE THIS APPLICATION f~f CONIRACTDR'S AFF] DAVIT AND PARTIAL ~'AIVER OF LIEN STATE OF Oklahoma COUNTY OF Creek ORDER NO. 'T.R. Fawcett of Sapulpa, Oklahoma, being sworn, says he is Assistant Secretary of h~ebco Tank Incorporated ( hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor") and is familiar with the facts herein st-areal. The Contractor ha's furnished all material, labor, tools, equipment., construction facilities and ever,vthing of every sort and performed all work covered hy Contractor's Invoice Mo. 5713 , dated 11/23/83 for the ~um of $ !n;.~77_50 under the contract entered into with ~.ity'of Mol!nd, MN dated the day of , 19 pertain.in§ to: Fab and erect (1) 25'-0" dia. x 72'.-0" high umbrella roof tank with knuckle Fhe Contractor has fully paid for ~ll' said material, labor, tools, :qu~pment and construction facilities furni.shed by it, or by its sub- contractors or materialmen, upon said premises, or furnished therefor. Upon payment of said invoice to Contractor of said sum, it hereby waives all liens and claims against the City nf Mn~Jnd~ MN , its premises and property, and, further it represents~that no other person or party has any right to ~ lien on account of any work-performed.for, or material furnished %o Contractor in regard to the charges covered by said invoice Sworn to me and subscribed in my presence this 23rdday of /~ November ,1 9 83 My Commission expires: 10/15/85 WEBCO TANK INCORPORATED Assistant Secretary FILE: FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS: EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES~xINC. PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO GOVERNING BODY MEMBERS December 1. 1985 Newsletter From all of us to all of you: Merry Christmas and a Happy, Prosperous New Year! It has been an eventful year. We'd all prefer that some events had not happened, but we must always remember at this very special time that there is hope. There must be hope that humankind can improve itself. Isn't that what Christmas is all about? We must be thankful for what we have -- family; community, a free country in which we can say just about anything and move anywhere, a country in which the individual means so much. So, let's ali have a peaceful Christmas. Sincere]y, AND ASSOCIATES. INC. BILLS ..... ~i',~l~ ZO, 1983 Bradley Exterminating 19.OO Holly Bostrom 162.OO Blackowiak & Son 95.00 Davies. Water Equip 147.92 Dictaphone 37.25 Jon Elam 6.65 First Bank Mpls 4.00 General Fire Equip 164.OO Henn Co. 1,382.50 Hecksel Machine Shop 10.OO Island Park Skelly 219.60 Koehnen's Standard 56.95 K & K Sales 342.92 The Laker 79.09 City of Minnetrista 25.00 McCombs-Knutson 1,379.OO Mound Locksmiths 3.00 MacQueen Equip 70.88 Minn Comm 28.75 .Metro Fone Communications 23.60 Mi nnegasco 315.98 N.W. Bell Tele 270.05 N.S.P. 4,149.27 Popham, Haik, Schnobrich 1,295.17 Paper Calmenson 962.00 Winner Industries 3.16 Water Products 89.72 Widmer Bros. 976.50 Dept of Property Taxation ~9.80 Griggs, Cooper 3,144.97 Johnson Bros. Liquor 2,388.15 MN Munic. Liq Stores 60.00 Old Peoria 2,205.22 Ed Phillips & Sons 2,862.40 Harold Pond Arena 1,250.O0 Webco Tank 7,413.75 A & K Construction 18,601.57 Continental Tele 1,258.13 LOGIS 6,119.18 Xerox, Inc. 907.72 TOTAL BILLS 58,579.85 SUMMARY OF AREA BOND SALES Net Municipality Date Type of Bonds /u~ount l~aturtt~ Rate, IOWA Des Motnes 10/01/83 Bond Anticipation Proj. Notes Series 1983 $ 9,500~ 1984 5.80% Dyersvtl]e 10/03/83 Street %mprovement Bonds 210M 1985-1992 7.88% Des Motnes 10/05/83 Bond Anticipation Construction Fund Warrants 4,000~ 1984 5.70% Hampton 10/05/83 Improvement Bonds 380M 198S-1996 8.25% Oes Moines 10/05/83 Bond Anticipation Construction Fund Warrants 4,000M 1984 5.70% Williamsburg Contnuntty 10/13/83 School Building Bonds 775M 1985-1991 7.44% School Otstrict west Des Moines lO/ll/83 Medical Clinc Revenue Bonds 1,100M 199S 10.5% Clinton 11/09/83 G.O. Street Improvement Bonds, Series 1983 1,100M 19B6-19BB 6.91% Bond Buyer Index Rating 9.42% MIG-1 9.46% NR 9.46% MIG~I 9.46% NR 9.46% MIG-1 9.49% NR 9..67% NR 9.79% Aa MINNESOTA East Gull Lake 09/06/83 St. Paul Port Authority 10/04/83 Special School Otst. lO/ll/B3 No. l, Minneapolis Minneapolis 10/13/83 Brooklyn Center lO/ll/B3 Xasttngs 10/17/83 Ham Lake lO/ll/B3 Moorhead lO/ll/B3 Brooklyn Center lO/ll/B3 I.S.D. 426, Stewart 10/26/83 I.S.O. 426, Stewart 10/26/83 Memorial Hospital 11/01/83 ist.; Forest Lake Hospital ll/O1/B3 ist., Forest Lake Lincoln County ll/O1/83 Mendota Heights 11/01/83 Mendota Heights ll/O1/83 Eagle Bend ll/O1/B3. Sauk Rapids 11/07/83 Sauk Rapids ll/O1/B3 Clay County 11/08/83 Lake City ll/OB/B3 NORTH DAKOTA Grand Forks Oickinson SOUTH DAKOTA South Dakota Housing Dev. Auth. (Pierre) South Dakota Housing Dev. Auth. (Pierre) Sioux Falls WISCONSIN Kenosha Antt9o LaCrosse wisconsin Reedsburg Reedsburg Westby Oak Creek lte of Wisconsin pit ukesha County Improvement Bonds 120M Industrial Oev. Revenue Bonds, Series 1983 2,595M G.O. Certificates of Indebtedness 1S,O00M Commercial Development Revenue Bonds 9,gOOM G.O. lax Increment Bonds of lgB3 930M G.O. Improvement Bonds of 1983, Series B 1,1eOM G.O. ImprovementBonds 210M G.O. Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1983 1,525M Tax Increment Bonds 930M G.O. School Aid Anticipation Certificates BOM G.O. lax Anticipation Certificate of 120M Indebtedness 1983 Hospital Gross Revenue Refunding Bonds 805M of 1983, Series A Hospital Gross Revenue Refunding Bonds 600M of 1983, Series B G.O. Drainage Ditch Bonds 8SOM G.O. Improvement Bonds 860M G.O. Tax Increment Bonds 1,O00M 'G.O. %mprovement Bonds 425M G.O. Improvement Bonds of 1983, Series B 200M G.O. Revenue Water System Bonds 800H G.O. Drainage Bonds 245M G.O. Redevelopment Bonds 400M 1985-1994 8.49% 9.75% NR 1984-2012 10.22% 9.46% A 1984 5.93% 9.67% MIG-1 1988-2008 12.62% 9.49% NR 1986-1997 8.40% 9.67% A-1 1986-2000 8.80% 9.67% A 1985-1991 7.29% 9.67% A 1985-1990 7.43% 9.67% A 1986-1997 8.40% 9.67% A-1 1984 6.68% 9.68% NR 1984 6.85% 9.68% NR 1984-1992 9.44% 9.81% NR 1985-2000 10.55% 9.81% NR 1986-2000 8.85% 9.81% Baa-1 1984-2000 8.35% 9.81% A 1986-1993 7.89% 9.81% A 1986-1999 9.41% 9.79% NR 1986-1995 8.22% 9.19% A 1985-2004 9.37% 9.79% A 1985-1994 8.12% 9.79% A 1986-1998 8.97% 9.79% NR 10/17/83 Temporary Improvement Bonds 856M 1986 6.85% 9.67% NR 11/08/83 Refunding Improvement Bonds 1983, Series B 715M 1986-2000 8.96% 9.79% A 10/20/83 Homeownershtp Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 71,889M Series E 10/20/83 Homeownershtp Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 3,361M Series F 11/08/83 G.O. Bonds 2,650M 10/05/83 Sewer System Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds 16,340M 10/19/83 Refunding unlimited Tax Bonds 1,325M 10/20/83 G.O. Bonds, Series 1983 1,110M 10/21/83 Operating Notes lO0,O00M 10/24/83 Refunding Bonds 1,040M 10/24/83 Promissory Notes 9ISM 10/25/83 Sewer System Mortgage Revenue Bonds 519M 11/01/83 Waterworks System Mortgage Revenue Bonds 1,5OOM 11/01/83 G.O. Bonds of 1983, Series C lO0,30OM 11/07/83 G.O. Promissory Unlimited Tax Notes 1,450N · 11/08/83 G.O. Promissory Notes of 1983, Series B 1,1~SM 1985-2015 10.22% 9.67% Aa 1984-2008 10.13% 9.67% Aa 1985-1999 8.69% 9.79% Aa-1 1984-2011 9.98% 9.46% A-1 1984-1991 7.95% 9.6)% A 1985-1998 8.33% 9,67% AA 1984 6.06% 9.46% Aa 1985-1999 9.32% 9.68% A lgBg-1993 B.lg% 9.68% A 1985-2003 10.09% 9.68% NR 1986-2001 10.74% 9.81% NR 1984-2008 8.18% 9.81% Aa 1984-1993 8.11% 9.B1% A-1 1984-1990 1.30% 9.19% Aa-1 American Legion Post 398 DATE Nov. 30, 1983 Gambling ~eport CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE GROSS: ~2725.00 ~26,875.00 EXPENSES: Sales ~ax Supplies ¢17.2~ 12~ .25 PAYOUT AS PRIZES: !'278.~9 ~3785.53. 1500.O0 1~' ~BO0.O0 PROF IT: ~9z6 51 DISTRIBUTION OF PROFITS: Vets. Hosp. Pheasant Police Reserve ~eed Ieadhers Federation Le6. Men's nnd Women' 5owl! n~ Fees Leg. Memor1.~ls Red Wing School ~' lano Gift ~5~ O0 200.00 15o.o0 ~:0.00 ~0.00 25.00 ~.00 Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building Seventh and Robed Streets ,St, Pout, Minnesota 55~0~ Telephone [6t2] 29t-6452 Office of the Chairman December 7, 1983 Mr. Thomas Harren Minnesota Intergovernmental Review Process State P1 anning Agency Capital Square Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 RE: Grant Applicatons for UMTA Section 16 (b) 2 Funds Transportation Services for the Elderly and Handicapped Metropolitan Council Referral File Nos. 11642-1 thru 11648-1, 11652-1, 11657-1, 11662-1, 11695-1, 11696-1, 11700-1, and 11720-1 State Identifier No. 83101701-11 thru 83101707-11, 83101801-1i, 83101802-11, 83101901-11, 83110301-11, 83110302-11, 83110801-11, and 83112301-11 Dear Mr. Harren: At its meeting on November 22, 1983, the Metropolitan Council considered the grant applications for UMTA Section 16 {b) 2 funds for the purchase of vehicles to transport the elderly and handicapped. This consideration was based'on a' report of the Committee on Metropolitan Commissions Referral Report No. 83- 124. A copy of this report is attached. The Council finds the following applications for UMTA 16 (b) 2 funds consistent with Council policies and recommends they be ranked as follows: 1. Suburban Paratransit, Inc. 2. Mounds View Public School Community Education Department 3~ Surburban Community Services ......... 4. East Side Neighborhood Service, Inc. -~- :-.: 5. Ebenezer Society 6. The Phoenix Residence, Inc. 7. Carver County Coordinated Services 8. Dakota Area Referral and Transportation for Seniors {DARTS) and Developmental Learning Center, Inc. Westonka Senior Citi~en~: Inc. _ e ~'~0. MinneaPolis Federation for Jewish Service 11. Anoka State Hospital Auxiliary 12. Martin Luther Manor 13. Courage Center 14. Metro Deaf Senior Citizens, Inc. An Equal Opportunity EmoIoyer Also attached are copies of Communications from the Cities of Anoka and Mourkd and from Anoka County Commenting on two of the applications. Sin~ely, Chair GJI:sb cc: Applicants Nancy Moore, Special Projects Coordinator, Mn/DOT Fred Tanzer, Regional Coordinator, Mn/DOT Paul K. Ruud, Highway Engineer, Anoka County Jerry Dulgar, City Manager, City of Anoka bJi)n Elam, City Manager, City of Mound Stephen Wilson, Metropolitan Council Staff Liz Newberry, Metropolitan Council Staff For Release: 11/22/83; 4:00 p.m. Bus. Item C-2 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON METROPOLITAN COMMISSIONS REFERRAL REPORT NO. 83-124 November 17, 1983 TO: Metropolitan Council SUBJECT: Grant Applications for UMTA Section 16(b)2 Funds for the 'Purchase of Vehicles to Transport the Elderly and Handicapped File Nos. 11642-1, 11643-1, 11644-1, 11645-1, 11646-1, 11647-1, 11648-1, 11652-1, 11657-1, 11662-1, 11695-1, 11696-1, 11700, The above grant applications came before the Committee on Metropolitan Commissions at its meeting Wednesday, November 16, 1983. ISSUES AND CONCERNS There were no major issues or concerns. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. That the Metropolitan Council rank the applications for UMTA 16(b)2 funding as follows: 1. Suburban Paratranslt, Inc. 2. Mounds View Public School Community Education Department 3. Suburban Community Services 4. East Side Neighborhood Service, Inc. 5. Ebenezer SoCiety 6. The Phoenix Residence, Inc. '~ ' 7. Carver County Coordinated Services 8. Dakota Area Referral and Transportation for Seniors (DARTS)-and Developmental Learning Center, Inc. --: 9. Westonka Senior Citizens, Inc. · :: 10. Minneapolis Federation for Jewish Service 11. Anoka State Hospital Auxiliary 12. Martin Luther Manor 13. Courage Center . 14. Metro Deaf Senior Citizens, Inc. Respectfully submitted, Marcia Bennett Chairperson SW015A PHTRN2 minnesota department of health 717 s.e. delaware st. p.o. box 9441 minneapolis 55440 (612) 6'23-5000 December 8, 1983 City Council c/o Francene C. Clark, Clerk City Hall 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Gentlemen: We are enclosing a copy of the report of our district office covering an investigation of your municipal water supply. If you have any questions concerning the information contained in this report, please contact Mr. David Engstrom, Public Health Engineer, at 612/623-5361. very truly, lund, P;E;,IChief GLE:DBE:lgl Enclosure cc: Greg Skinner, Water Supt. ~,'~/~ an equal opportunity employer , MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REPORT ON INVESTIGATION OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY e of Water Supply PWS ID Number Nound l~unicipal #ater Supply 1270038 Street · Telephone Numbers: 5341 1~ayvood Road 472-1155 c,tv /state Izip Code c,ty: ~d~ ~ ~ 553~ Operator: .~7Z-1251 Engineer: . ~59-3700 County ~ District He~epin ~ ~ro~Z~a~ Other: 472-4368 Water Superintendent Classification Plant Clarification Owner Type Creg Skin-er C C ~ict~l Other Operators Clarification Plant Type Plumbing Permits and ~ke ReaDe 9 C~tty Inspe~ions R~uir~ ~ ~ Yes No Bob ~anley '-~--~ HoCe Date of Pr~ious Su~ey Date of Su~ey April 7, 1982 Nov~ber 3, 1983 City Engineer ~cC~.-~tson & Associa~e8 SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS: ~ Municipal :~ ~ School or Collie ~ Recreation Area ~ Mobile Home Park ~ Hotel/Motel ~ ~mpground ~ Company Town ~ Resort ~ Housing Development ~ Institution ~ Restaurant ~ Other Population Serv~ ! Service Connections Storage Capacity: 9 t~ 2 ~ 958 (List ~parately) 75~0 gal. elevated ~ign ~pacity (gal/day) Average Daily Production (~l/day) 300 ~0~ gal. elevated 4,300,000 1,300,000 200,000 gal. ~r conotr ~ergency Capacity (gal/day) Highest Daily Production (gal/day) TREATMENT WELL DATA ~ell ~1 C E' 19~ 10 28~ 8 293 ~ift 24 17 ~0 ~ ~ell ~2 G X 6 505 vT veil ~3 G P Dc ~ Va 1950 20 163: 10 296 Drift 105 13 450 ~ell ~ C g Dc Kc Va 1962 10 600 729 Ht.S~ 70 50 ~0 ~ ~ell ~5 G X Va 1970 8 1~05 ~1~0 Dr[fE 63 9 Well ~ O' P ~ ,Kc Va' 1976 20 1~1 ~ ~75 Drt~C 77 16 600 Well ~7 C P Dc [c Va 1977 16 133 60 lg& Dri[~ ~ 2[ 8~ ~orarily aband~ed. Surveyed by: David Ensstr~ Richard Clark Approved b~: H E-00842-02 OWNER TYPE ' Authority County Commissic;n State ... District Federal Municipal In'es:or Other Other DISINFECTION - D Dc = Chlorine gas Dh = Hypochlorites Do = Other PLANT TYPE Community Non-Community AERATION - A Ac = Contact beds or trays Ak = Potassium Permanganate Am = Patented Aerator As = Spray Aerator At = Overflow (cascade) trays Ap = Pressure aeration using air compressor Ao = Other SOURCE CODE S = Surface Water G = Ground Water P = Purchased Water (Surface Source) W :' Purchased Water (Ground Source) AVAILABILITY.· ;' E = Emergency Source I = Interim Source P = Permanent Source R = R'eserve Source S = Seasonal Source X = Abandoned 0 = Other COAGULATION- C Ca = Alum Ci = Iron salts CI = Lime Cs = Soda Ash · Cp = Polymers Co = Other SEDIMENTATION - S Sb = Baffled Basins Sc = Covered Basin (other thin Su = Open Basin (other than housing) Sv = Upward flow cylimtdrical tank Sh = Holizontal flow tanks St = Tube Settlers-· So = Other FILTRATION- F F1 = Gravity Sand F2 = Gravity Birm F3 = Gravity Anthracite Sand F4, = Gra. vity Zeolite Sand F5 = Gravity J~atatytic Mineral Sand F6 = Gravity Activated Carbon F7 = Gravity Other Fa = Pressure Sand Fb = Pressure Birm Fc = Pressure Anthracite Sand Fd = Pressure Zeolite Sand Fe = Pressure Catalytic Mineral Sand Ff = Pressure Activated Carbon Fh = Pressure Other 1=i = Diatomaceous Earth Fo = Other CORROSIOH CONTROL STABILIZATION - K Kc = Phosphate C(.~ll~itodI':(l'; Kg --- Chlormu Gas Kh = Hypochlorite Ks- = Soclium Silicate Kp : Alkali Feed · Kr .-- Recarbonation Ko = Other SOFTENING -- H · Hc = Chemical Hz = Zeolite Ho = Other TASTE AND ODOR CONTROL-T · Tc = Activated Carbon Td = Chlorine Dioxide Tk = Potassium Permanganate Ts = Sulfur Dioxide To = 'Other AMMONIATION - N Nc = Ammonia Compound Ng = Ammonia Gas No = Other FLUORIDATION - V Va = Hydrofluo.~ilicic Acid Vs = Sodium Silicofluoride Vt --- Sodium Fhm~i(le Vo ~ ~)th(:r Mound Municipal Water Supply November 3~ 1983 Recommendations: 1. Abandoned deep wells, whether municipal or private, should be properly sealed and abandoned as outlined in the Water Well Construction Code. Geological well logs were unavaible for wells ~1 and #3. The City should attempt to obtain these records. One method of obtaining an accurate log is to contact the Minnesota Geological Survey for a gamma-log survey when the well is pulled for routine maintenance. Based upon the existing well capacity and current pumping records, the City is deficient in available pumping capacity. The City should strongly consider providing additional well capacity to meet maximum demands and provide standby capability. 4..'Chlorine rooms should have: A. (Wells #3,#6, & #7) A louvered air intake located near the ceiling and as far a~my from the exhaust vent as possible. B. (Wells $1 & ~7) An inspection window through which a viewer can see the entire room. C. (Well #1) Switches for the exhaust fan and lights located outside the chlorine room, preferably near the inspection window.' .6. Undersized mains (less than 6 inches in diameter) should be replaced as the opportunities present themselves. All underwater crossings should be eliminated as soon as practical by constructing an above-water crossing. An alternate method would be to install a manhole on one side of the crossing, having valves and appurtenances such that the crossing can be pressure tested. The average daily water usage greatly exceeds the guidelines of providing a minimum of one-day water storage capacity. We recommend that a study be conducted to determine the adequacy of the system and the possible need for increased water storage facilities. Over the last year, this Department has not received the required bacteriological samples from the City for ? of the last 12 months. This is a violation of the Safe Drinking Water Act (Rules Pertaining to Public Water Supplies 7MCAR ~.147B). The City shall collect the required 11 samples per month and have them analyzed as specified in the Rule. Mound Municipal Water Supply -2- 9. A oomprehensive program of cross-connection surveillance should be instituted to protect the municipal water supply. This should include: a. The detection and correction of cross-connections to unsafe water supplies. b. The education of the public on the dangers of cross-connections. (See attached article.) c. The installation of vacuum breakers on all threaded hose bibbs in new and old buildings. (See attached article.) d. The replacement of defective plumbing in older buildings. e. Periodic cross-connection inspections of potentially hazardous industries and commercial establishments. 10. The electrical service for the fluoride pumps should be through a programmable plug and outlet. 11. To have an effective fluoridation program, a residual of between 0.9 to 1.5 milligrams per liter should be maintained on the distribution system. 12. The opportunity for' additional training in water supply work should be made available .to the operator. Attendance at the annual waterworks operators seminar, held in the area, is a valuable experience for anyone engaged in this field. David B. Engstrom, Public Health Engineer Environmental Field Services ~ -RiChard D. Clark, P.E. Supervisor, Engineering Unit Page 4 · CROSS-CONNECTION A primary cause of' waterborne 'disease outbreaks in m~ni.cipal and community water supply sys- tems is a cross-connec':ibn between an unsafe 'and a safe supply o~ water. Cross-connections can be found in almost all ~vazer .supply systems.. Under certain conditions, they can allosv toxic materials or disease producing microorganisms ..to be backsiphoned or backpressured into the potable water supply. If adequate ,water pres- sure is maintained at all times the possibility of backflow will be minimized, but inadequate water pressure will increase the chance of back- :flow. Many people fail to comprehend how negative pressures can occur in water distribu- tion syst.ems. Fluctuating pressures occur con- stantly, and under severe conditions (e.g., fire :flow demands, '~he flushing of hydrants, low levels in elevated tanks, pump failure or high localized usage), pressures can drop below atmo- spheric pressure. Such incidents have occurred in the past, and continue to occur. }minlmize potential health hazards', the ~esota Health Department recommends that :all water supply operators conduct ongoing cros~connecdon control Programs. Enforce- merit of the Minnesota Plumbing Code is an integral part of any cross-connection program. Most community systems have some type of cross-connection program, but very few have enforceable programs for service connections ~hat pre-date the Code. Cross-connections oc- cur in both commercial and residential plumbing installations. One of the most common and potentially hazardous problem areas is the threaded hose connection. The Plumblng Code (MHD 130(e)(9)) requires that all outlets have an air-gap or a backflow preventer installed. This provision covers all new or remodeled installa- tions, but does not require back.*low preventers in older installations. If backflow devices are not installed on threaded hose bibbs, and ~ertil- izers, pesticides or herbicides are applied to lawns and gardens using aspirators, sprayers or erosion feed systems,'these substances . may be backsiphoned into the drinking water supply.' There have been a number o~. ,~,etl-documente~ cases where'pesticides and ferti!izer~ ~,ere b~ck- s,,-,~!,, systems, in siphoned into public water ~.~.~ Minnesota and nationwide. The waterx supply operator can help prevent such problems, by conducting a voluntary proEram to educate homeowners about the insta!lation am.d use o; backflow preventers on threaded hose bibbs. The program should provide information on the dangers of cross-connections, through ~ circu!ar enclosed with the water bill, or by circulating a separate newsletter. The operator may also wish to make back~low preventers available, for a fee, or provide information en where the con- sumer mig. ht purchase approved back~low pre- venters. The following sample letter could be used to alert the public about poss!ble cross- connection hazards. . Dear Customer: Your plumbi.ng system may have a feature which is potentially hazardous to your health-- ~he threaded hose connection (outside hose connection, laundry tub, etc.). Toxic chemi- cals can be "backsiphoned" into your water supply if you use a hose for herbicide/pesticide spraying, fertilizer applications or chemical mixing. Backsiphonage does occasionally oc- cur, and is more prevalent in areas .where water pressure is low. The current Plumbing Code requires that all newly installed threaded hose connections be pro~eczed against backsi- phonage by a "backflow preventer." Ii your threaded hose connections do not have back- flow preventers, please contact , to have these devices installed at a minimal charge. I:f you have any questions or comments on imple- menting this program, please contact Dick Clark a~ 612/62~ .~5227. HIHHESOTA DEPARTHEHT OF HEALTH Section of.Water Supply and General Engineering Sanitation Safety Rating of M~und Municipal Date NovemBer S, 1988 Water Supply Perfect A~ A8 See Recomrmndation I(o. Score Found Recommended In Attached Report .) Source Sanitary Safety ~>, 20 20 20 1,2 Adequacy of treatment J Bacteriological Quality l0 10 10 Physical quality 2 2 2 Chemical quality 4 2 2 Biological quality 2 2 2 Adequacy of quantity 2 1 2 3 Sub-total 40 Hazard adjustment factor deducted 0 Total 40 37 38 ,) Prime Hoving Equipment Well or intake 8 8 8 Pumps 7 7 7 Piping arrangement 5 Re servoirs ? 7 7 Equipment housing 3 3 3 Sub -total 30 Razard adjustment factor deducted 0 Total . ~0 30 30 ]) Distribution System Street mains 5 5 5 5,6 Building services 2 1. $ 1.5 Plumb lng 3 2. HYdrants 1 1 1 Storage 4 3 4 7 Pressure 2 2 2 Tap water quality 3 $ S Sub -total 20 Hazard adjustment factor deducted 0 Total 20 18 19 D) Operation and Operators Control of system ' 3 0 3 8,9,10,11 Condition of system Operator qualificat ionsI 5 5 5 12 ............................... ........ .................................................................................. Hazard adjustment factor deducted 0 ' Total 10 7 10 GRAND TOTAL AND RATING 100 92 I 97 and .upward - high degree of safety. WatchfUl maintenance needed. to 89 - moderately high degree of safety. Correction and maintenance program continued. to 84 - poor to dangerous condition. Prompt corrective action urgently needed. By MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ANALYTICAL DATA David Report To Field Number 'Town, County. Etc, Mound s Hennepin This line for Lab. use only. Sample Number 11-$-$3 Date Collected Time Collected .Te,~perat ute OF Date Received by Lab. Coliform group Total Solids M. P. N1rper 100 mi. Con. ~ Comp. M. F. C. per 100 mi. Turbidity Color Total hardness as CaCO3 Alkalinity as CaCO3 pH value Iron Manganese Chloride Residual Chlorine Sulphate Fluoride Total Phosphorus Nitrite Nitrogen Nitrate Nitrogen Methylene 'Blue Active Sub. as ABS Calcium as CaCO:3 Sodium Potassium Spec. Cond. ~JmhOs/cm @ 25°C.. phs @ 50 °C. 23647 Sampling Point and Source of Sample Well Well ~3 Well ~6 ~ ' ~ell.~7 5872 Clenwood, H.B. City Shop, S.T. 23652 23649 23650 23651 1.70 ed By David Engstrom MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ANALYTICAL DATA David Report To Engstrom · Town, County, ' Etc. Hound, Hennepin 1705 Eagle, H.B. use only. 11-3-83 Sampling Point and Source of Sample lOgO0 a.=. Lab. M. P. N. per 100 ml. Con. ~ Comp. n M. F. C. per 100 mi. ,s CaCO3 ; Active Sub. as ABS :03 . lhos/cm ~ 250C.. 23653 'J..O CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS MUNICIPALITY Mound Watermalns Ductile Iron Cast Iron Lead-Jointed Piping Coal-Tar Lined Concrete Asbestos Cement Vinyl Lined Asbestos Cement Steel Plastic (Type_ ) Other (Type ,) Service Lines Lead or Lead Alloys Galvanized Steel Copper Plastic (Type Other (Type ,) DATE COMPLETED November 8t 1983 (Best Lineal Feet Estimate) 5 miles 40 miles 45 miles Number of Services Lineal Feet 2956 2 2958 150,000' 200' 150,200 ~lumbinq Galvanized Steel Copper .. Other (Type ) Water Tank LininGs Capacity of Tank [Gallons~ 1. 75,000 gallons 2. 300,000 gallons 3. 200,000 gallon~ _Type of Coating 1. None 2. Zinc-Rich Epoxy 3. Vinyl System 10% 90%