The URL can be used to link to this page

1987-03-10 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987 COUNCIL CHAMBERS Pledge of Allegiance (Flag Ceremony by Girl Scout Troop 1115, Fifth Graders from Shirley Hills) Approve Minutes: February 24, 1987, Regular Meeting February 28, 1987, Special Meeting Pg. 553-562 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS: CASE ~87-606, 607 & 608: David Morse, 1838 Commerce Blvd., PID #13-117-24 23 0006 Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit Establishing a Planned Development Area and Approval of a Preliminary Plat and Variances Pg. 563-579 Be CASE #87-60q: Steve Coddon, 4841 Bartlett Blvd., Metes & Bounds Desc., PID #13-117-24 44 0003 Subdivision of Land Pg. 580-588 C · CASE #87-610: Steve Coddon, 4800 Block Bartlett Blvd., PID #13-117-24 44 0001/0002 Request: Subdivision and Platting of Land Pg. 589-597 De CASE ~87-611: JRW Properties, Commerce Square All in Koehler's Addition to Mound Proposed Vacation of Part of Lynwood Blvd. and 2 Street Easements (near the corner Lynwood Blvd. & Commerce Blvd.) Pg. 598-608 E. CASE ~87-612: ReQuest: To Consider Amendment of Section 23.625.3 of the Mound Zoning Code to Add Class II Restaurants (Fast Food, Convenience and Drive-In) as a Conditional Use Pg. 609-613 Page 550 10. 11. Fe CASE ~87-61R: Glen Olson (Gina Maria's Restaurant), 2244A Commerce Blvd. Request: To Consider the Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for the Operation of a Fast Food, Convenience~ Drive-In Restaurant (Class II) Pg. 614-622 Ge CASE ~87-61~: Phillip & Eva Hasch, 4810 Northern Road, Part of Lots 24. 25 & 26, Subd. of Lots 1 & 32, Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood, PID #13-117-24 44 0075/0076/0087. ]i~ To Consider Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Variances to Add Two Attached Residential Units to an Existing 4-Plex Located at 4810 Northern Road, in the B-2, General Business Zone Pg. 623-632 He YEAR XIII (lq87) CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) Funds To Provide Citizen Input on the City of Mound's proposed use of approximately $64,822· Pg. 633-641 Resolution Rescinding Council Action of February 28, 1987, Regarding L.M.C.D. Appointment Pg. 642 Computer System (Materials to be distributed at Tuesday's meeting) BID AWARD: City Hall Vestibule (Materials to be distributed at Tuesday's meeting) Set Bid-Opening Date for 1987 Seal Coat Project (Suggested Date: April 3, 1987) Pg. 643-644 An Ordinance Amending Chapter IX of the City Code by Adding Sections 910:00 through 910:35, Inclusive, Relating to Controlled Substances Pg. 645-648 Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present Payment of Bills Pg. 649-660 INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. Department Head Monthly Reports for February, 1987 Pg. 661-685 Article from Minneapolis Star & Tribune dated February 27, 1987, on public facilities projects in Champlin. Please note the size of the public works building and the estimated cost. Those numbers almost match what Mound's estimates were for about the same size building. Pg. 6 86 C. School Board Minutes of February 9, 1987 Pg. 687-688 Page 551 De Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) is having a special membership meeting on Thursday, March 1~ in St. Louis ?ark. LegislatiYe topics will be discussed. I plan to attend. If you are interested in attending, let me know and we can ride together. Pg. 689-693 ~ State of the Region Meeting sponsored by Metropolitan Council, Wednesday, March 25, 1987, Minneapolis/St. Paul Hilton, 1:30 P.M. - 8:00 P.M. Attached is a copy of the brochure. Let me know if you want to attend and I will pre-register you. Pg. 6 94 Vern Anderson, Mound Retail Association and myself, scheduled a meeting with the local businesses and individuals for March 6. We invited 45 people and 19 people attended at 7:30 A.M. in City Hall. Prior to the meeting each person was sent a copy of the Lost Lake study prepared by Maxfield Research Group and was told the desire of the City Council to obtain input and reaction to the report. A good discussion was held. General consensus was that the City does have complete control over the pro- perty and can dictate the types of uses of the property. Commercial use was favored over resi- dential use but whatever the use is, the group wanted to'be able to tie it into the wetlands portion of the property. In addition, consensus seemed to be that if the additional two acres to the east that are owned by Balboa were made a part of a development proposal, the project would be signi- ficantly enhanced. Members in attendance as well as those who didn't appear at the meeting were asked to submit comments in writing by March 18 on what they thought were possible uses for the property. Go Jerry Dodds, new owner of Coast-to-Coast has invited the Mayor and City Council and myself to the Grand Opening of his new store. This event is scheduled for March 18, at 9:00 A.M. at the Coast-to-Coast Store in Mound. Please mark your calendars. Attached is a letter from Dowden Cable Systems regarding Channel 23 availability. Pg. 695 NOTICE: The Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission will be briefed by Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District staff on Monday, March 9, 4:30 P.M. in the Metropolitan Council Chambers, at 300 Metro Square Building, regarding the Feasibility Report and Acquisition Master Plan for Lake Minnetonka Regional Park. Pg. 6 96 Page 552 March 10, 1987 RESOLUTION #87-41 PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF MARCH 7-14, 1987, GIRL SCOUT WEEK IN. THE CITY OF MOUND WHEREAS, the 75th Anniversary of Girl Scouting is a celebration of the vitality of the world's langest.v, oluntary organization for girls; and WHEREAS, it.is.a:celebrati.on of a-75-year commitment to meeting the changing needs of girls; and WHEREAS, it is a celebration of a spirit of adventure that challenges Girl Scouts.to learn new skills, to try new activities and to explor.e other cultures; and WHEREAS, it is a celebration of Gir.1 Scouts' gifts of service and good citizenship to our~communitles and neighborhoods; and . WHEREAS, it is a celebration of a bri.ght future for young women and for Girl Scouting; and WHEREAS, our community has been the direct benefiCiary of this 75-year tradition; and WHEREAS., .the 30,OOO glrl-members, in the Greater Minneapolis Girl Scout Council and the Girl Scout Council of St. Croix Valley will be the leaders of our future; NOW, THEREFORE, .I, Steve Smith, by.virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor, do urge the citizens of Mound to support the Girl Scouts in their celebration; I now proclaim this.week, March 7-14, 1987, Girl Scout Week in the City of Mound. The foregoi, ng resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The fo'llowing Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor,' Attest: City Clerk 21 February 2~, 1987 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 2~ 1987 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, February 24, 1987, at 6:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Don Abel, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark,. Finance Director John Norman, Building Official Jan Bertrand, Fire Chief Don Bryce, Park Director Jim Fackler, Police Chief Len Harrell, City Attorney Curt Pearson, and the following interested citizens: Craig Gustafson, Larry Shaw, Tom Reese, Bob Brown, John Ewald, Nell weber, Cathy Bailey, Jack Wilson, Neal Wilson, Alton Clark, Barbara Heyman-Clark, Connie Meyer, John Thoresen~ Gary Birnbaum, Frank Ahrens, Brian Asleson, Will'iam Killion, and Michael Rosell. INTERVIEWS FOR L.M.C.D. REPRESENTATIVE: The City Council interviewed the following persons for an appointment as Mound's representative to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. 1'. Frank Ahrens, 4673 Island View'Drive 2. Brian Asleson, 2618 Clare Lane 3. William Killion, 5227 Bartlett Blvd. 4. Tom Reese, 5641 Bartlett Blvd. 5. Michael Rosell, 4751 Carlow Road 6. Nell Weber, 5111 Windsor Road The City Manager reported that another applicant, Gary Birnbaum, would be present around 8:00 P.M. for his interview. He also stated that Leonard Kopp had applied, but could not attend- tonights interview session and would like to be interviewed at a later date. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. SWEARING IN OF NEW COUNCILMEMBER The Ci. ty Clerk swore in Donald W. Abel as the new Councilmember to fill the unexpired term of Steve Smith who became Mayor in January. L.M.C.D. APPOINTMENT MOTION made'by Johnson, seconded by Abel to table a decision on the L.M.C.D. appointment until Saturday morning, February 22 February 24, 1987 28, 1987, at 7:00 A.M. newapaper and posted. Motion carried. '"4 Notice to be given to the official The vote was unanimously in favor. MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to approve the Minutes. of the February 10, 1987, Regular Meeting as submitted. Motion carried. PRESENTATION OF DONATION FOR BULLET PROOF VEST TO THE MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Ms. Barbara Heyman-Clark and Alton Clark presented the Mayor and Police Chief with 2 checks totaling $100.00 to be put toward the purchase of a bullet proof vest. The Mayor and Police Chief thanked them for their donation. PUBLIC HEARING: DELINOUENT UTILITY BILLS The City Manager revised the amount down to $789.01. Abel moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-31 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $789.01 AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT-OFF WATER SERVICE FOR THOSE ACCOUNTS The vote was Unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARZNG: CASE'S87-617. ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONDUCT A MINOR AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR IN THE B-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. 52qq SHORE- LINE BLVD.~ PID #12-117-24 24 0021 The Building Official explained the request and reported that the Planning Commission has recommended approval with 3 conditlons as stated in the proposed resolution on Page 373 of the Council Packet. The applicants, Craig Gustafson and Larry Shaw, were present. Councilmembers Abel and Johnson recommended that a ~th condition be added to the resolution, "Prior to commencement of · business, the underground storage tank being used to store used oil shall be checked to determine that the tank is in a sound condition". The Council agreed. The Mayor opened the public hearing. · Mayor closed the public hearing. No one ~esponded. The Abel moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: February 2~,, 1987 RESOLUTION ~87-32 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONDITIONAL USE. PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF A "QUICK LUBEe, OIL, LUBRICATION AND TRANSMISSION FLUID CHANGE FACILITY AND SIGN VARIANCE AT 529q SHORELINE BLVD., ?ID #13-117-2q 3q 0021, P & Z CASE #87-617 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE #87-615: RON GEHRING. q8XX TUXEDO BLVD.. LOTS q & 10. BLOCK 10: LOT SIZE VARIANCE. PID ~25-1 The Building Official explained that the Planning Commission has recommended approval based on a hardship because of the l§' street easement that was necessary when Tuxedo Blvd. was improved. Two other conditions were that Lots 9 and 10 be combined into one tax parcel and all structure setbacks conform to the zoning ordinance provisions. Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolut'ion: RESOLUTION ~87-33 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE IN LOT AREA FOR LOTS 9 & 10, BLOCK 10, DEVON, PID ~2q-11?-2q 11 0007/0008 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE ~87-616: JOHN & KAREN EWALD. qq~ CRESTVIEW ROAD. LOT 22. BLOCK 25~ SHADYWOOD POINT. 5 FOOT STREET FRONT VARIANCE. PID #1~-117-2~ 11 0112 The Building Official explained the applicants' request. She then reported that the Planning Commission recommended denial of this variance because they felt there was no hardship. The Council discussed the Building Official's recommendation that the variance be approved because of the shape of the lot and the topography of the site. Setbacks were also discussed. Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-3q RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE VARIANCES AS REQUESTED FOR LOT 22, BLOCK 25, SHADYWOOD POINT, PID ~13-117-2q 11 0112, (a933 CRESTVIEW ROAD), P & Z CASE ~87-616 A roll call vote was three in favor with Jensen and Jessen voting nay. Motion carried. 2~ February 24, 1987 GORDON WOLF COMMONS DOCK PERMIT FOR lq87 Park Director, Jim Fackler, reviewed the problems that have occurred since 1985 with regard to Gordon Wolf's commons dock site ~31360. The Park Commission has recommended that the City Council deny Gordon Wolf's 1987 application for a commons dock. Abel moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-35 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PARK COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO DENY GORDON WOLF*S 1987 APPLICATION FOR A COMMONS DOCK The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. L.M.C.D. INTERVIEt7 The City Council interviewed I~. Gary Birnbaum, 3110 Highland Blvd. for the position of L.M.C.D. representative from Mound. Decision to be made on Saturday, February 28, 1987, at 7:00 A.M. when one more interview will be held. HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH DEPT. PRESENTATION. GEORGE George Bowlin, Hennepin County Community Health Dept., did a slide presentation on the health services available thru Hennepin County. The Council thanked Mr. Bowlin for his presentation. LAKE MINNETONKA REGIONAL PARK PRESENTATION. NElL WEBER. HENNEPIN COUNTY PARKS Mr. Neil Weber, Hennepin County Park, stated that a regional park has been considered for this area for many years. He stressed that lake access is not a key issue, the park is the key issue, althpugh with the park would come some additional parking spots for lake access. This would then take the pressure off the lake communities to find more parking spots. They are currently looking at 3 parcels of land with approximately 292 acres. Preliminary plans would call for 2 accesses, one on Halsteads Bay' and one on Smithtown Bay. In the Lake Minnetonka Regional Park budget is also the realignment of County Road 4~. There was discussion on the following: 1. The lack of use that Carver Park receives and the need for another Regional Park so close to Carver Park. 2. The tax base that would be lost if a park were put in. The Council thanked Mr. Weber for his presentation. t 25 February 24, 1087 DEPARTMENT HEAD ANNUAL REPoRTs The following Department Heads presented their annual reports to the City Council: City Clerk Fran Clark, Building Official Jan Bertrand, and Fire Chief Don Bryce. PROPOSED L.M.C.D. LEGISLATION~.BOB RASCOP Bob Rascop, Chairman of the L.M.C.D., reviewed a bill that the L.M.C.D. would like to see the Legislature pass. This bill deals with lake usage charges; removal of substandard structures~ docks, boats, or fallen trees within 50 feet of the lake; 2 Metro Council ideas, one relating to public access sites and another, the L.M.C.D.'s review and approval of any agency having an impact on the lake; and compensation for expenses incurred in the performance of duties as a board member of the L.M.C.D. · The Council thanked Mr. Rascop for his presentation. PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT Jensen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION {87-36 RESOLUTION APPOINTING BRAD SOHNS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION (TERM TO EXPIRE DECEMBER 31, 1987) A roll call vote was 3 in favor with Abel and Smith voting nay. Motion carried. MORTGAGE SATISFACTION. HEI. INC. The City Manager explained that HEI, Inc. has paid off their 2% loan from CDBG funds and is asking for a mortgage satisfaction. Abel moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-37 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO SIGN A MORTGAGE SATISFACTION FOR HEI, INC. " The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PROCLAMATION: VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK. MARCH 8-14. lq87 Smith moved and Abel seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION {87-38 PROCLAIMING MARCH 8-14, 1987, AS VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK IN THE CITY OF MOUND The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ,5',5'7 26 February 2~,, 1987 COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT There were no comments or suggestions from citizens present. LICENSE RENEWALS The following licenses expire on February 28, 1987, and are on the agenda for renewal: Garbarge Disposal Blackowiak & Sons Dependable Services Westonka Sanitation Woodlake Sanitary Cigarette Al& Alma's Supper Club American Legion ~398 Ben Franklin Boat Rentals of Minnetonka Bob's Bait Shop Brickley's Market Captain Billy's Donnie's on the Lake Duane's 66 Meyers Mound Service Mound Municipal Liquor PDQ Food Store SuperAmerica Station Texaco Thrifty Drug Store Westonka Foods Union 76 MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Smith to authorize the renewal cfi.licenses as listed above. The vote was unanimously in flavor. Motion carried. PAYMENT OF BILLS The bills were presented for consideration. MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to approve the payment cfi bills as presented on the pre-list, in the amount cfi $143,824.31, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in flavor. Motion carried. lq87 MUNICIPAL INSURANCE PROGRAM Earl Bailey was present and went over the premiums and the coverage for the 1987 City of Mound insurance program. Property, crime, equipment, general liability, auto and E.M.T.'s will again · be covered thru the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Liquor,. Public Official's E & O, Police Professional, Worker's Compensation and Bonds will be thru private sources. The total cost for 1987 will be $143,785. In 1986, it was.$1qO,260. The projected amount for 1987 was budgeted at $189,389. Abel moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-39 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE POLICES, PREMIUMS AND COMPANIES AS SUBMITTED BY MR. EARL ?ebruar¥ 24, 1987 TB£ ~gS? MONICIPAL INSBBANC£ PROGR~ The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. RECYCLING CONTRACT - HENNEPIN COUNTI The City Manager explained that the City needs to authorize the Mayor to sign the Recycling Contract with Hennepin County in order to receive the $13:955.29 from the County. Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION /~87-q0. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN A CONTRACT FOR RECYCLING NITH HENNEPIN COUNTY (CONTRACT ~60510) The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. REMINDER: 8:30 A.M. Work Session- Saturday, February 21, 1987, at REMINDER: LMCD Candidate Interviews, 6:30 P.M., February 24, 1987, before the Council Meeting. Ce The Mound City Day's Committee 'is developing a historical booklet for the 75th Anniversary celebration. Judy Soukup will take the Council's picture Tuesday evening. De January 1987 Financial Report as prepared by John Norman, Finance Director. Planning Commission Minutes of February 9, 1987, and February 16 , 1987 · Agenda for 1987 State of the Region Meeting sponsored by. the Metropolitan Council - March 25, 1987. If you are interested in attending, please advise me. .' G. School Board Minutes - January 12, 1987. Memo from the Secretary of State's Office showing what cities i~ Hennepin County will be using the Optical Scan Voting Equipment in elections held after July 1, 1987. EXECUTIVE SESSION The Council went into Executive Session at 11:q0 P.M. to discuss labor negotiations. They returned at 12:10 A.M. February 24, 1987 MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Johnson to adjourn at 12:10 A.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk BILLS. FEBRUARY 2h, 1~87 Batch Batch 874021 874022 Computer II Run dated II 2/1~/87 II 104,716.44 38,078.70 142,795.14 Supe rAmer i ca gasol i ne 1,029.17 Total Bills 143,824.31 MINUTES OF SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 28, 1987 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 AM, at the city hall. Members present: Mayor Steve Smith, Phyllis Jessen,. Liz Jensen, Skip Johnson and Don Abel. Absent: none. Also present: Leonard Kopp and Ed 5hukle,.Ci:ty Manager. MaYor Smith asked Mr. Kopp to make an opening statement why he wanted to be considered ~or the position on the LMCD. Following the interview .with Mr. Kopp, the Council discussed the appointment. It was moved by Don Abel, seconded by Liz Jensen to appoint Tom Reese to serve on the LMCD from the City of Hound. It was then moved by Skip Johnson, seconded by Mayor Smith to amend the motion to 'appoint Tom Reese contingent upon him stepping down from the Planning Commission. The vote was then taken on the amendment. The following were in favor: Johnson, Smith, Abel and Jensen. Nayes: Jessen. The vote was then taken on the orlglnal motion. The vote was unanimously in favor. Mayor Smith then called Tom Reese. Mr. Reese then indicated he would let Mr. Smith know by Sunday evening, whether or not he would accept the appointment. It was then moved by Phyllis Jessen, seconded by Don Abel and carried unanimously to appoint Leonard Kopp as alternate representative if Mr. Reese declined. The LMCD legislation issue was briefly discussed. it on the next work session agenda. It was decided to put Itwas then moved by Don Abel and seconded by Liz Jensen to adjourn the meeting. Edward J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota GASE NUMBERS 87-606, 87-607 & 87-6o8 NOTICE OF HEARING ON THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ESTABLISHING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA AND APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT AND VARIANCES FOR LAND LOCATED AT 1838 COMMERCE BOULEVARD PlO NO. '13-117-24 23 0006 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, March 10, 1987, at 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall; 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, a hearing will be held on the approval of a conditional'use permit establishing a Planned Development' . Area (P.U.D.) and approval.of a preliminary plat for property located in the 1800 b]ock on"Commerce Boulevard (PID Number 13-117-24 23 0006). The proposal will consist of'three single.family residences and two 2 family residences. Front yard :w.~th' variances are being requested for two single family resi- dences. The ]egal' description is as.follows: That part of Lots 27 and 29 described as beginning at a point on West line of Govt. Lot 4 Section 13 Township 117 Range 24 distance 1446 71/100 feet south from northwest corner of said Govt. Lot 4 than south along said west 'line 395 4/10 feet than'south 68 degrees 05 minutes east 414 7/10 feet than north 27 degrees 10 minutes 40 seconds west 30 94/100 feet than north 31 degreeS 32 minutes east 223'feet than north 33 degrees 59 minutes east 214 47/100 feet than 'northi53 degrees'.46 minutes west 261 33/100 feet to a point which is on a line bearing north 89 degrees 55 minutes east and distance 395 34/100 feet from beginning than south 89 degrees 55 minutes west 395.34 feet'to beginning subject to Road, Lafayette Park, Lake Minnetonka. All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the opportunity to be heard. Fr~cene C. Clark, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA), APPROVAL OF VARIANCES AND APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE MORSE ADDITION, PID NO. 13 117 24 23 0006. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 10, 1987, pursuant to the Mound Code of Ordinances to consider the issuance of a conditional use permit to establish a Planned Development Area to allow development of b~o new single family homes, two twin homes (4 maits) and create a new lot area for an existing residential structure. The hearing also considered two lot width variances and the preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the subject property meets the criteria for the establishment of a Planned Development Area as stated in Section 23.411' of the Mound Code of Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the proposed uses are allowable under the Planned Development Area; and WHEREAS, the applicant, has applied for lot width variances of 52.5 feet for Lots 2 and 3, Block 3; and WHEREAS, The proposed variances satisfy the criteria for granting variances as stated in Section 23.506.1 of the Code of Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat is generally consistent with the Mound Comprehensive Plan, Ordinances of the City and the Subdivision Code; and WHEREAS, all persons wishing to be heard were heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the conditional Use Permit, variances and preliminary plat for the Morse Addition are hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Per plat on file at Mound City Hall dated January 14, 1987. 2. Posting of a subdividers escrow in the amount of $1,000.00. Grading, drainage and utility plans and the access to Sherwood Drive shall be reviewed and approved by the city engineer. 4. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the watershed district. The driveway location on Commerce Boulevard shall be reviewed and approved by Hennepin County. Se ® 10. 11. Lot width variances for Lots 2 and 3 shall not exceed 52.5 feet. Placement of the housinG unit on Lot 2, Block 3 shall observe at least a 15 foot setback to the common property line between Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 3. Ail by-laws, Home Owner's Association Articles of Incorporation, and protective covenants shall be reviewed and approved by the city attorney and filed with the final plat. Park dedication fees in the amount of $300.00 shall be paid for each new unit at the time of building permit issuance. LandscapinG plans for the twin home units shall be submitted for review by the city planner. Proposed docks shall be reviewed and approved by the LMCD. 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 TO: Plar~in~ Co~issi~ and Staff FROM: Mark Koeglar, City Planner DATE: February 3, 1987 SUB~-I~T: Morse Addition - Oonditional Use Pemit To Establish a Planned Development Area, Variance Approval and Preliminary Plat Approval ~CANT: David Morse CASE N0: 87.606, 607. and 608 FILE NO: 87-310-A13-Z0 LOCATI~: 1838 Cmmerce Boulevard EXISTING Z(I~IN~: R-1 Residential PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to establish a 5.~a~ Planned Development Area (PDA). The PDA will include an existing residenoe, two new single detached structures amd two twin homes (four units) for a total of .seven housing units. The entire parcel is zoned R-1 which requires a 10,000 square foot .lot size or equivalent density. The PDA allows for mixed types of housing providing that they comply with the density standards of the underlying zoning district. Each of the major components, of the POA (twin homes, existing house, n~ single family homes) will be reviewed separately. The northern boundary of the proposed PDA abuts land zoned B-2. In this area which is shown asOu~ot Ben the proposed plat, two twin home structures are being proposed. The total area of Outlot B is 40,460 square feet which equates to 10,115 square feet per unit. Ail four units will be served by a common driveway similar to the one in existsnceat the PortHarrison Townhomes. The proposed twin home units will comply with the provisions of the Mound Zoning Code. The existing residence in the center of the PDA will remain in its present form. The house is served by a looped driveway with one enhance point along Commerce Boulevard. There is no planned drivewsy cor~ction between the existing l--~me ar~ any of the proposed units. The southern end of the planned development area contains two proposed single-family home sites. Access for both of the proposed lots is from Sherwood Drive which ig a cul-de-gac located ~outh of the applicant'g g~oge~y. The applicant is negotiating with appropriate land owners to secure ownership of a 15-20 foot strip of land as a coonection to the cul-de-sac. Because both of the lots are provided access by this strip of lar~, they do not meet the lot width . requirement of 60 feet at the building setback line thereby requiring variances. Depending oo the final configuration of the entrance area, the variances may .be as substantial as 50 feet. The remainder of the property (69,100 square feet) is shown as an outlot for comn~n use. The applicant indicated that the out/or area may contain a walking path and common boat docks for each of the housing units. ~: Approval of the planned development area is a reasonable method of developing the subject land parcel. The inclusicn of the two twin homes on the north side provides a good buffer between the B-2 commercial land and the existing single-family uses to the south. Lots 2 and 3 lie in a remnant parcel which is difficult to serve with city streets. Due to the unusual shape of the parcel and the surrounding topography, the proposed variance complies with the criteria for granting variances as stated in the Mound Zoning Code. As a whole, the parcel represents a positive use of the vacant land while preserving the existing residential structure. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit establishing the Morse Addition as a planned'development area, lot width variances for Lots 2 and 3 of Block 3 and a preliminary plat of the Morse Addition subject to the following conditions: Grading, drainage and utility plans and the access to Sherwood Drive shall be reviewed and approved by the city engineer. 2. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Watershed District. The driveway location on ~rce Boulevard s~l be ~i~ed ~ approved by Hennepin County. 4. Lot width variances for Lots 2 and 3 shall not exceed 50 feet. Placement of the housing unit on Lot 2, Block 3 shall observe at least a 15 foot setback ~o the common property line between Lot I and Lot 2, Block 3. Park dedication fees shall be collected at the time of building permit issuance in accordance with the charges in effect at the date of permanent. e All by-laws, Home Owner's Association Articles of Incorporation, and protective covenants shall be reviewed and approved by the city attorney and filed with the final plat. RE C E IVED McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS · LAND SURVEYORS ! PLANNERS 2 1987,. Ms. Oan Bertrand Pianning& Zoning Department City of Mound 5)41 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN'5))64 January 29, 1987 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth. Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 SUBJECT: P~oposed Plat - Morse Addition Case #87-608 hl<A #8082 Dear Jan: As requested, we have reviewed the above preliminary plat and have the foiiowing comments and recommendations. We have reviewed oniy the preliminary plat application and ieft the variance and conditional use review for the City Planner to comment on. Grading and Drainage We are concerned about how the runoff will be handled from Outlot B. The natural slope of this portion of the property is to the north, which will need to be changed somewhat to divert the runoff away from the existing residence. The easiest method is to install curb and gutter along the proposed driveway and divert most of the water from the proposed development directly onto Commerce Boulevard. At the time of final plat application a more complete grading plan wii1 be needed showing proposed grading for not oniy Outiot B, but aiso Lots 2 and ~ and the access to these lots. Utilities The proposed sewer and water services as shown for the twin homes on Outlot B are acceptable with the following exceptions: a® be A cleanout will be required at the property line on the existing sewer service at which point the individuai services may be extended to each unit. A check vaive wili be required on the sewer service at each unit. We have suggested to the Owner's Engineer a much more acceptable plan for extending the sanitary sewer and watermain from the Sherwood Drive cul-de-sac than the proposed shown on the pian submitted. This wouid invoive acquiring a utility easement from an adjacent property owner, so the sanitary sewer and watezinain couid be extended due north f~om where they presently terminate. This would make it much easier to separate the services for each iot and for the City to maintain their portion. A more detailed of the utilities plan will be necessary at the time of Final Plat Application. Ms. Jan Bertrand January 2~, 1987 Page Two Hiscellaneous The Uniform Fire Code requires a minimum access of 20', whereas the preliminary plat shows only 15' for Lots 2 and 3. In conclusion, we would recommend approval of the preliminary plat contingent upon the following conditions: 1. A more complete grading and drainage plan be submitted at the time of Final Plat Application. 2. Cleanouts and check valves be installed on the sewer services for the twin homes. 3. A more acceptable plan for extending the existing sanitary sewer and watemain in Sherwood Drive. 4. A 20' wide driveway easement from Sherwood Drive to serve Lots 2 and 3. If you have any questions or require additional infomation, please contact us. Very truly yours, HcCOIvlB~KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron $C:djk Planning Commission Hinutes February 9, 1987' 2..Cases'Number.87-606, 87~607 and 87-608 'Public He~rlng on ~ondltlonal Use' · 'Permit establishing a P'lanned Development Area and approval of lot width variances'and preliminary plat for land located at 1838 Commerce Boulevara, He,es.& Bounds Desc~, Lafayette Park, Lake Hinnetonka; ~ID 13'117-2~ 23 0006 Present were Oavld Horse, Appllcant, and Jim Norby Clty Planner, Har~Koegter, revlewed his report explalnln~ establl~hlng a P3anned DeveLopment Area ls done'by conditional use permi~ and ~111 include the exlsting residence, 2 new single family detached structures and 2 new twin homes for a total of 7 housing units. He stated staff ls recommending approval of the condltlonal use permit establlshlnf the Horse Addition as-e planned . development area, lot width variances for Lots 2 and 3 of Block 3 and a prellmlnary plat of the Ho,se Addltlon'subJect to conditions llsted. City Englneer, John Cameron, revlevmd hls letter and suggestlc~s for Items needing to .be woYked out Including 'relocation of hydrant and/or more acceptT able plan for extending water'and se~er In Shervax~d Orlve; he f&lt they ali .could be resolved bef6re the final plat ~as presented. Applicant Oavld Horse stated. In .his talk wlth the Fire Horshal Gerald Babb, Babb dldn~t.thlnk there ~ould. bee problem' running hoses'..from the hydrant, nor turning the trucks around a~d that-a 15 foot driveway access to the slngle family sltes ~ould be fine f~r Safety reasons. '.Staff suggested Item 8, '~vrl.t~en statement from the Fire Harshall on the 15 foot access',.be added to the ils, of conditions. The Con~'~'ssl~n questloned~If.they'd have difficulty ge~tlng another. ~'~e~t; also had questions on drive locatlon for.twin' homes and grading and drainage and absence of 1ct llnes .for .twin homes and If Outlot'A would be handled with.covenants so value ~obld be Included In tax parcels. :The Chairman opened the Publlc' hearing and the .f011owlng persons had comments and questions: RUSS PETERSON - He dl~n~t understand layout and after a r&vlew of plans, ~ '" commented it ~ras the flrst tlme neighbors have seen'It and It is Unusual and complex situation and deservessome study. 0AVID LO~ELIN. expreSSed'concerns with drainage unto his property ~hlch Is to' the northof proposed Horse Addition. DAVE LIEBENO~ advised'he Is purchasing Logelln'.s property and l's concerned with the drainage also. JIH NORBY showed prellmlnai~/ plans for t~ln-homes and stated ~helr architect reconwended nbt"alterlng.the"hillslde~ they'll'cut drlve ~n.~nd there wi11 be i boulder ~all 6 to 8 feet hlgh so you don~t see the units from Commerce .Boulevardl grades hopefully wiI~1 be kept at 6 or 7~ (not exceed IO~ at the most) and all drainage wi11 be ~ack onto Commerce; not onto adjolnlng prop- erty and Into the lake. They want to keep the trees between proposed build- .lng and street and not Impact. the 1and; beauty Is all the big maple trees. Cameron stated .he~d need more detailed plans. The Chalrman requested the staff to~ake sure the neighbors have an opportunity to look at the drainage plans before the final approval and to get the Englneer~s assurance that .they are not golng to have a wa,er'problem. The C~alrman closed the pUblic hearing and the Con~mlsslon discussed the pro- Ject further.''They asked if. the slngle family sites could take access from · the County Road/whether there was any precedent on providing access as pro- posed off of Sherwood 0rive. Horse stated County wanted mlnlmum lmPact on · ' County Road !10 because of the heavy traffic, etc., and also.there is a big hollow which would need fill, culverts, etc. and~ould compound the drainage problem toward Swanson~s to'the, southeast corner~ there ~ould have to be a swale to divert the water~ Utility. easement(s) wlll be needed to extend the water and sewer'llnes'northward. Cameron advised 15 feet .is not enough for utilitles as water'and sewer must be 10 feet apart. Koegler. and Cameron . do not have a problem wlth 15 foot wide drlvewa~ as long as the Fire Hers' concurs and glves a written'statement. Hlchael moved and Hayer seconded a~notion to recommend approval of the request wlth staff recommendations of .Items I thrOugh 7, Incluslve; the addition of Item 8 ~rltten statement from Fire Hhrshall okaying 15 foot wide driveway access to Lots 2 and 3 of ~lock 3" and addlng to Item 1, "as per letter dated 1-2~-87 with the exception of POint # ~". The vote 'was unanimously in favor. Camille O. Andre * James R. St)ensley Richard R. Miller Michael R. Carroll Permit Application No: 87-29 Date: Feburary 24, 1987 Owner: DavidMorse P.O. Box 377 Mound, I~i 55364 Location- City of Mound, Sec 13BCB, Commerce Blvd south of Three Points Blvd, Harrison's Bay, Lake Minnetonka Purpose:. Maintenance dredging of 200 cubic yards of material Dear Mr. Morse: At the regularly scheduled February 19, 1987 meeting 'of the Board of Managers, the subject permit application was reviewed. Action was taken allowing the 'District staff to issue your permit on]y after receipt and staff approval of the following: 1, Review and approval of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Please be advised that the project is not authorized until the above has been submitted and you have been notified of permit issuance. Should you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at 473-4224. Very truly yours, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District Julie Johnson, Engineer cc: Board G. Macomber j. Boudreau, DNR ~C. Reep J. Bertrand, City of Mound Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364 -. TO: FROH: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission, City Councll and Staff Jerry Babb, Fire Harshal February 10, 1987 Site.access at the north end of Sherwood Drive for Horse Addition Preliminary Plat I was asked to review the adequacy of sufficient access to the newly proposed~single family lots at the north end of Sherwood Drive.. Due to the grade of the land in the area, I feel the fifteen (15) foot access Shown on the preliminary plat dated January 21, 1987 wi11 be adequate for emergency vehicles and personnel. The utilities will be reviewed by the City Engineer. 5 Case APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COHHISSION (Please type the following information) Street Address of Property Legal Description of Property: Date Filed [-l~ -"7 2. Lot ~_~-~c~ ~)~c. c~ ~"/~r_L~C'~ Block Addition. 3. ~ner's Name .~~ ~~ Day Phone No. q. Applicant (If' other than owner): Name. Day Phone Address /~_.~. C_e~,'14~ ?~.Yb ~ '(~, ~ ¢ ~/, Type of Request: ~ Variance. ~ ~onditlonal Use permit ( ) ~endment '- ( ) Zoning Interpretation S Review ( ) Sign Permit ( ) Vetland Permit ~P.U.~' ( )*Other ® '*If other, .specify: Present Zoh'lng District '" Existing Use(s) of Property ~.~//~'~' e Has an application ever been made for zoning, var~a~rce, or condltlonal use permit or other zoning procedure f~r this property? /~<::~ If so, list date(s) of 'list date(s) of applicat~on, action taken and pr6vide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the a6ove statements and the statements contained In any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true an~ accurate. I consent to the entry In or upon the premises described in thls appllcation by any~uthorized officla'l of the City of H~und for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required~by law~ . Signature of Applicant ~ Date . Planning Commission Recommendation: Date Council Action: Resolution No. Date ~'-~_~ Request fOr Zoning Variance Procedure '(2) Case if _~~4)7 D. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North compass dlrection F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. II!. Request for a Zoning Variance A. All Information below, a site plan, as described in Part II, and general application must be provided before a hearing w111 be scheduled. B. Does the present use of the property conform to al~use regulations for the zone district In which it Is located? Yes (V/) No ( ) If "no", specify each non-conforming use: : Do the existing structures comply with all area height~and bulk regul~t, lons ~or the zone district in which it Is.located? Yes (y~) No ( ) If ~'no", specify each non-conforming use: Which unique physical charac~teristics o~'the subject property prevent Its reasonable use for any of,~he' uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) .Too narrow (~/)i' Topography ( ) Soil ( ) Too small ( /~ Drainage ( ) Sub-surface ( ) Too shallo~ (4) Shape ( ) Other: Specify: Was the hardship described above c~eated bY the action of anyone having property Interests }n the land after the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (v/) If yes, explain: F. Was the hardship created by any ~)~ man-made change such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No. If yes, explain~ Are the conditions of hardship for'which you request a var/lance peculiar only to the property described In this petition? Yes . (Vi No ( ) If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? What Is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using · maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanatlon. Attach additional sheets, If necessary.) I. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? g7- January 15,1987 city of Mound,Planning and Zoning Commisions; Our request is for a planned unit development. The development will consist of three single family residences and two,two family residences. The one acre parcel to be used for the multi family dwellings abuts an existing B-2 commercial zone. Therefore we are requesting a conditional use permit for this parcel to be used for two multi family homes. A commons area is being established along the shoreline to be owned jointly by the seven home owners. This outlot will include a commons docking area. This is to insure that there is a minimum impact on the natural habitat of the shoreline and wetlands. The other part of this request is for a variance to enable the two single family residences to be set back from Sherwood Drive further than usual. We expect to provide the city of Mound with fine quality housing units and to disturb as little as possible,the marvelous park-like parcel of land. Sincerly, David Morse Property Owner IAPPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF LAN~'c~--'~~ Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND FEE $ ooS' ,23 F r;,~,e>~ PLAT PARCEL Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: To be divided as follows: ZONIN~ ^ll'supportlnR'documents!*'such as sketch plans t .surveys'~ attacHments~ etc. must be submitt'e'd*In '8½" x 11'! s'~ze'and/or.. 14 copies pi.us* one 8½"'X ,11" copy. (attach $ur~;e~ or scale drawing showing 'adjacent streets, dimension o~ proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN. LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot Ne. . From Square feet TO Squa~ feet Reason: " - ~ ' (signature) ADDRESS DATE Applicanl's interest in ~he properS/: This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- 'arian given why this is not the case. , PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: 1222 PETITION WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY TO THE MORSE ADDITION: . Originally, Sherwood Shores Development was approved and completed as a quiet Cul de sac area. We, the undersigned, object to any unreasonable reconstruction of the area. II. The Morse Developmentxcurrently has a paved road (A) from Commerce Boulevard which extends east to a location just short of the 2 proposed single family dwellings (BI & B2) See Plat. III. As an alternative to disruption of the Cul de sac on Sherwood Drive, the Morse Addition could extend the paved road A to the ~ro~osed dwellings B1 & B2. IV. We object to the construction of a road from Sherwood Drive Cul de sac to the proposed dwellings on the following grounds: (1). Construction of said driveway would necessarily result in 3 driveways being situated within the narrow , confines of 25 feet. (2). Construction of the proposed road would result in the loss of trees & foilage, thereby diminishing the esthetic beauty of the Cul de sac. (3). During winters of normal or abnormal snowfall, plowing of three narrowly constructed driveways could cause serious problems with the abutting three landowners. (4). Finally, it is likely or even probable that if the roadway is constructed as proposed, eventually the roadway will be connected to Commerce Boulevard from the Morse addition, thereby increasing vehicular traffic and creating a hazard to small children who live in the area. ND: Telepl~one junction box Water valve Catch bas i'.n Power pole H yd rant Manhole Light CITY OF HOUND Hound, Hinnesota CASE NO. 87-609 NoTIcE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON SUBDIVISION OF LAND PID 13-117-2~ ~ 0003 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that there will be a publi, c hearing at the Hound City Hall, $3ql May~ood Road, Mound, Minnesota, at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, Hatch: loth, 1987, to consider the subdivision of land located at q8ql Bartlett Boulevard in the City of Hound and legally described as follows: "commencing at Southwest corner· of'Skarps East Lawn Addition than north to southeast corner of R.L.S. No..2~l than west to southwest corner thereof than northerly along the west.line thereof to the northwesterly corner thereof than westerly 2 ql/100 feet along northerly line of R.L.S. No. 281 extended than north 23 degrees 31 minutes west lq feet than south 7 degrees ~ minutes west 13 25/.100 feet than north 17 degrees 58 minutes west 80 feet more or less to center line of County Road than southwesterly along center line of'road to a point ~2q feet due east from west line of Govt. Lot 8 than south 5~7 feet to south line of section than east to a point due south from beginning than north 162 feet to beginning except road, Unplatted.13-117-2~" (PID No. 13-117-2q qq 0003) Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above will .be heard at this meeting. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk - RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION APPROVING A REGISTERED LAND SURVEY FOR A TWO LOT SUBDIVISION ALONG BARTLEIT BOULEVARD, PID NUMBER 13 117 24 44 0003. ~*~EREAS, the City Council on March 10, 1987, held a public hearing pursuant to the Mound Code of Ordinances, to consider approval of a registered land survey for the establishment of two residential lots on property described as PID number 13 117 24 44 0003; and WHEREAS, said Registered Land Survey is consistent with the Mound Comprehensive Plan, ordinances of the City of Mound and the Subdivision Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOUNCIL OF T~E CITY OF. MOUND: Registered Land Survey Case Number 87-609 is approved upon compliance with the following requirements: Per Registered Land Survey on file at Mound City Hall dated January 12, 1987. 2. All lots shall meet minimum area, setback and frontage requirements. Grading, drainage and utililty plans shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by the city engineer. Park dedication fees in the amount of $300.00 per lot for the newly created lots shall be collected at the time of building permit issuance. The applicant shall submit plans to the watershed district for review. 6. All proposed docks shall be reviewed and approved by the LMCD. 7. The discrepancy with the adjacent RLS shall be resolved. The applicant shall supply the city with a copy of the driveway easement for review by the city attorney. 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 TO: Planning Commission and Staff t~21: Mark Koegler, City Planner DAT~: February 3, 1987 ~.- Registered Land Survey Approval Steve Coddon 87-609 FILE NO: 87-310-A10-ZO ZONING= (R-l) Single Family Residential IDC_.ATION: 4841 Bartlett Boulevard (IX~PJ~rv~PIAN: Residential PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to split a parcel into t~o lots of 18,200 square feet and 11,200 square feet. This report will address the zoning ordinance aspects of the subject proposal and a companion report prepared by the city engineer will review grading, drainage, utilities and related matters. Tract A as proposed by the applicant contains an existing residence. Proposed lot lines provide the existing structure with conforming setbacks. Tract B which is irregularly shaped is depicted as a buildable parcel without the approval of any variances. Tract A contains a garage which has doors facing in a northeastern direction. Since the garage doors do not face the street, the accessory building (garage) is in ccmpliance with the setback, requirements. The proposed plan shows a driveway access for both lots which for~s a common loo9. This loop is necessary in order to provide pro[er access and maneuvering room for the garage on Tract A. Presumably, an easement agreement will be put into effect to provic%~ legal access for both parcels. RE~DATION~ The proposed registered land survey fu11¥ complies with the Mound ~.onin~ Code and no varlance-~ have been requested. S~af~ recommends approval of the registered land survey as shown on the plan dated January 12, 1987 subject to the following condition: - The applicant shall supply ~he city with a copy of ~he driveway easement for review by the city attorney. McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINE[RS · LAND SURVEYORS · PLANNERS February 3, 1987 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Perk Boulevard Plymouth. Minnesota 5[~441 (612) 559-3700 Ms. Jan Be~.rand City of Mound Planning and Zoning 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUB3ECT: P~oposed R.L.S. Steve Coddon Property Case ~87-609 ~<A ~8189 Dear 0an: As requested we have reviewed the lot split proposed by Mr. Coddon and have the following comments and recommendations. We understand that this division of land wi]_I now be done as a Registered Land Survey (R.L.S.), which should be processed by the City in the same manner as a plat. An R.L.S. is much the same as a plat with the following exceptions: Dedication of land for public use such as right-of-way or easements for drainage and utility purposes cannot be recorded as part of the R.L.S. The Owners of the property do not sign a R.L.S. as they do on a plat. 3o The total property must be registered land, whereas, a plat may contain abstract property or registered iand. GRADING AND DRAINAGE For preliminary approval, the plan furnished is sufficent. A more detailed grading plan will be required at the time a building permit is requested. UTILITIES A proposed utility plan was not submitted for our review. Sanitary sewer is readiiy availabie in an easement across the northeriy position of Tract B, but it appears water service wouid have to come from the City main iocated in Bartiett Boulevard. It will be the applicants responsibiiity to provide water service to the newly created parcei. Ms. San Bertrand February 3, 1987 Page Two MISCELLANEOUS .It has been the City's policy to collect deficient street assessments resulting from the creation of new buildable parcels. In this case the property would be deficient one unit charge from the 1979 Street Improvements in the amount of $1,828.15 which should be assessed against Tract B. The" existing assessments remaining (footage and area) would be spread between the two parcels. The proposed R.L.S. shows a driveway easement over the northwest corner of Tract A, which we assume is necessaz7 to gain access to the existing garage.. This easement wiii need to be recorded as a separate document. It appears that the existing legal description for the property describes to the centerline of Bartlett Boulevard. If this is the case, the~-5 feet used for right-of-way of Bartlett Boulevard will need to be shown as a separate tract and then deeded to the City. This item will need to be clarified before the final R.L.S. is prepared. In conclusion, we would recommend approval of the preliminary plat contingent.upon the following conditions: 1. The applicant be responsible for furnishing water service to Tract B. Arrangements be made to pay one deficient street unit charge in the amount of $1,828.15 at the time of final approval. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact us. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron $C:tdv Planning Commission Hinutes February 9, 1987 Case No. 87-609 Public' Hearing on Subdivision of. Land (RLS) - 48qi Bartlett Boulevard; Metes S Bounds Desc., .PID # 13-117-2q hq 0003 . Steven Coddon was present. The Planne~ reviewed his report on request to divide parcel lnto tva0 lots', one of which has an existing 'residence. Lot sizes and setbacks of existing house and'detached garage are Conforming to zoning'requirements. The pro- posed plan shows driveway access for both lots from a common loop which will require an easement agreement. 'Also Koeg.ler advised this divlsion should be subject to 1 park dedication charge at the time a building pe.rmit'is taken. His recommendation was for approval subject to review of driveway easement by the City Attorney. The City Engineer reviewed his report and commented that if. the property goes to the mlddle of the street, the street portion would have to be shown as another Tract in the R.L.S. and be deeded to the City. He is recommending approval subject to conditions listed'in his letter. The appi'icant stated he would deed over whatever property is needed by the Clty for the street. The Commission questione'd'the setback allowed for concrete entrance on house and garage setbacks; also if lot square footage after street tract was taken would still met the minimum lot.area? The Chairman opened the publlc .hearing and the following persons had comments or questions: Douglas A. Dion was not sure what ~vas being divided and also asked about minimum building standards and configuration in the City-. Wayne Elbrecht was interested in the adj'olning property; asked If division would affect the Commons dock sites/ The Chairman ci°sed'the public.hearing and the' Commission discussed request briefly. Jensen moved and Weiland seconded a motion to recommend approval of the registered land survey as shown on the plan dated January 12, 1987 subject · to the following conditions: 1) Applicant shall supply City with a copy of the driveway easement for ~eview by the City Attorney; 2) An additional park dedication fee be assessR~ [g[r~ new lot; 3) No variances be granted {or either parcel; q) A waive~Ib~gn&d for a deficient street unit charge for assessment; 5) Need for deeded right-of-way for Bartlett Boulevard be satisfled; and 6) Applicant be responsible for furnlshing water service to Tract B. The vote on the motion ~as.unanlmously in favor, l~otion carried. The public hearing will be set for March 10, 1987 by the City Council. ?., ~.; VILLAGE OF MOUND -' , ~ ~ >~ ~~'"~ FEE $ FEE OWNER PLAT PARCEL Location end complete legal description of property to be divided: To be divided as follows: ZONING -' ' · A11 su~;~ortlng documen'ts?"such as'sketch plans~ sur"v,eys', attac,l~en,t,s,, etc. must'be 'submit~:'~d ~ln' 8½" 'X 11".' size 'and/or.. lh copie~- ~lus; one 8½" X i'ib', 'copy. ' (attach survey Or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimen$io~ ef prepose4 build;ng sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REOUE.S. TE .D..FOR: New Lot.No· From Square feet TO Square feet Applicant'· interest in the property: Thi· application mu·t be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explnn- *etlon given why this is not the ca·e. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: SO KE' [1967 Aerial Photo) %...--Share line according ~A ,~A d d~l · CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota CASE NO. 87-610 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING OF LAND P'ID # 13-117-24 44 0001/0002 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: · NOTICE IS HEREBY'GIVEN that there will be.a public hearing at the Mound City Hall, 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Mi.nnesota, at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, March lOth, ~1987, to consider the subdivision and platting of land located west o.~ 4841 Bartlett Boulevard (Approximately 4865 Bartlett) in the City of Mound and legally, described as follows: "A strip of land 10 feet wide lying sOuth of County Road and westerly of and adjacent the following described.line: Commencing 630 2/10 feet west from southeast corner of Govt. Lot 8 than northerly to a point in center of County Road which is 250 feet southwesterly along same from a point due north of a point 872 6/10 feet east from meander corner no. 30 in Unplatted Section 13-117-2~'(PID # 13-117-24 44 OOO1); and "'commencing 630 2/10 feet west of southeast corner of Govt. Lot 8 than east 160 feet than north to center of County Road than southwesterly along road to a point' 250 feet' southwesterly'from a point due north of a point 872 6/10 feet east of meander corner no. 30 than southerly to.beginning except road in Unplatted Sectlon 13-117-24" (PID # 13-117-24 44 0002). Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above will be heard at this meeting. Francene C. Ci-ark, City Clerk' RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION APPROVING A REGISTERED LAND SURVEY FOR A FOUR LOT SUBDIVISION ALONG BARTLETT BOULEVARD, PID NUMBERS 13 117 24 44 0001 AND 13 117 24 44 0002. WHEREAS, the City Council on March 10, 1987, held a public hearing pursuant to the Mound Code of Ordinances, to consider approval of a registered land survey for the establishment of four residential lots on property described as PID numbers 13 117 24 44 0001 and 13 117 24 44 0002; and WHEREAS, said Registered Land Survey is consistent with the Mound Comprehensive Plan, ordinances of the City of Mound and the Subdivision Code. NON, THEREFOREv BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND: Registered Land Survey Case Number 87-610 is approved upon compliance with the following requirements: Per RegiStered Land Survey on file at Mound City Hall dated January 12, 1987. 2. All lots shall meet minimum area, setback a~d frontage requirements. Grading, drainage and utililty plans shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by the city engineer. Park dedication fees in the amount of $300.00 per lot for each of the three newly created lots shall be collected at the time of building permit issuance. The applicant shall submit plans to the watershed district for review. 6. All proposed docks shall be reviewed and approved by the LMCD. 7. The discrepancy with the adjacent RLS shall be resolved. 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 TO: Planning Commission and Staff FI~0M: Mark Koegler, City Planner Ik%TE: February 3, 1987 SUBJECT: Registered Iand Survey Approval APPLICANT: Steve Coddon ~. NO..- 87-610 FILE NO: 87-310-A10-ZO ZONING: (R-l) Single Family Residential ~ON: 4800 Block Bartlett Boulevard PLAN: Residential PROPOSAL: Case Number 87-610 lies immediately west of the proposed registered land survey, Case Number 87-609. It is being proposed as a separate approval, possibly due to a surveying discrepancy that occurs along the common lot line between the two areas. The city engineer is providing separate comments on the engineering aspects of this case. The applicant is proposing to est_~hlish four lots, all of which conform to the requirements of the Mound Zoning Code. Sizes of the proposed lots are as follows: Tract A - 10,000 square feet, Tract B - 11,200 square feet, Tract C- 13,200 square feet and Tract D - 12,480 square feet. All of the proposed lots contain 60 feet of width at the building setback line, have a 30 foot front yard setback, 10 foot side yard setbacks and observe a 50 foot setback from Lake Minnetonka. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the registered land survey dated January 12, 1987. As a postscript to this report: the applicant should be aware that lake frontages shown on the plan are 44 feet for each lot. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District requires 50 feet of lake shore frontage ~or each private dock. M¢COMBS-KNUTSON A$SOCIAT£S, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS · LAND SURVEYORS · PLANNERS February ~, 1987 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 MS. 3an Bertrand Plannin9 and Zoning City of Hound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 SUBJECT: P~oposed R.L.S. Steve Coddon Property Case ~87-610 MKA #8190 Dear 3an: As requested we have reviewed the Preiiminary Registered Land Survey (R.L.S.) submitted by Steve Coddon and have the following comments and recommendations. An R.L.S. is much the same as a plat with the following exceptions: Dedication of land for pubiic use such as right-of-way or easements for drainage and utility purposes cannot be recorded as part of the R.L.S. 2. The Owners of the property do not sign a R.L.S. as they do on a plat. 'The total property must be registered land, whereas, a plat may contain abstract property or registered iand. GRADING AND DRAINAGE 1. The preliminary grades as shown are acceptable. We would recommend that drainage and utility easements 5 foot in width · along ali side lot lines and l0 foot in width along the street right-of-way be furnished. UTILITIES i. It appears from the City as-buiit sanitary sewer pians, that aIi four proposed iots are presentiy served. Ms. Oan BertranM February Page Two ?7- The City's records do not indicate any in-place water services; therefore individual services will need to be installed. We would suggest that the two services for Tracts A & B should be installed in a common trench thus minimizing the area of street to be replaced. The water services for Tracts C & D would be installed in the same manner. MISCELLANEOUS This property was originally assessed one unit charge for the 1979 Street Improvement Project. With the creation of 4 buiIdabie iots a deficit exists of 3 units at $1,828.i5 per unit for a total of $5,484.45. It appears that the existing legal description for the property describes to the centeriine of Bartiett Boulevard. If this is the case, the ~ feet used for right-of-way of Bartlett BouIevard wii1 need to be shown as a separate tract and then deeded to the City. We are assuming from the property iine dimensions that some discrepancy exists in the Iegai descriptions between the two proposed R.L.S.'s resuIting in a gap between the two parceIs. These items wiiI need'to be ciarified before the finaI R.L.S. is prepared. In conclusion, we would recommend approval of the preliminary plat contingent upon the following conditions. The applicant be responsible for furnishing water service to ali fou~ lots. Arrangements be made to pay ) deficient street unit charges in the amount of $5,484.45 at the time of finai piat approvaI. 3. Furnish the appropriate drainage and utility easements to the City. If you have any questions, or need any additionai information, piease contact us. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 3ohn Cameron 3C:tdv 77- G/o COMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. i CONSULTING ENGINEERS · LAND SURVEYORS · PLANNERS Hatch 2, 1987 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Perk Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Mr..Edward 3. Shukle, Jr., City Manager .City of Mound 5~41 Maywood Road Nound, MN 55364 SUBOECT: P~oposed R.L.S. Steven Coddon P~operty Case #87-610 hKA #8190 Dear Ed: We had stated in our previous ~eview letter to 3an Bertrand, dated February 3, 1987, that a gap probably exists between this p~oposed R.L.S. and another R.L.S. under consideration as Case #87-609. Both of these requests have been applied for by the same individual. We had recommended at that time that the problem of the gap between the two properties be solved before both R.L.S.'s are finalized. At this time, we wiSh to emphasize the point that this parcel of unknown size (probabiy somewhere in the vicinity of iO' wide) should be combined with one of the two R.L.S.'s, preferably the westerly parcei under consideration as Case ~87-610. The. foliowing excerpt is fz~mMound's Platting and Subdivision Reguiations, Section ~'~0.i15, Subd. 8, Lot Remnants. "Ail remnants of lots below minimum size left over after subdividing of a iarger tract must be added to adjacent lots, rather than be aliowed toremain as unusable parcels." We have discussed this situation with Curt Pearson and beIieve you will find he is .in.agreement that this parcel of unknown size shouid be made part of one of the R.L.S.'s and not left to be dealt with at a later date. If you have any questions, or need any additional information, please contact us. Very truly yours, McCONBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Oohn Cameron aC: jmj cc: Cu~t Pearson Plannlng Commission Hinutes February 9, 1987 Case No. 87-610 Publlc Hearing on Subdivision of Land. (R.L.S.) ~etes ~ bounds, Unp.latted: PI0 .Numbers 13-117-24 44 0001/0002 Steven Coddon was present. The City Planner reviewed his report on the zonlng aspects of thls request for an registered land survey for q.proposed lots. They ali meet minimum lot size and the'proposed building slte setbacks are conforming. He noted there is a surveying discrepancy along the common ]or lines between this proposed'R.L.S, and the last one. On the .west side of these parcelg is Nor- wood Lane which is a right-of-v~a, y used for commons purposes fo~ 2 docks;" this PrOPosal would not impact either dock. It was noted that the proposed lots are hq feet at the lake and the LMCD requires 50 feet for private docks. The City-Engineer reviewed his report and recommendations for servicing. the Tracts with Water; also.as in previous case, street portion of parcels needs.to be a Separate tract and be deeded to the City; there will'be three deficient street unit charges (total of $5,q8~.qS); applicant is responsible for furnishing water service to a11 four lots and furnlshlng appropriate drainage and utillty easements to the City. He also commented on the gap between the two proposed R.L.S.~s and clarification before the final R.L.S. is prepared. Steve Coddon 'stated that he can't divide what he doesn't own; he plans to g~ through whatever process is required and eventually will add to the most easterly Tract of this R,L.S. He stated it's a court process (quiet action) and takes.perhaps up to a year to clear and hopefully to have it awarded to him. The Chairman opened the publlc ~earing. Douglas Dion 'had questiOn about road and ]and on other side. Coddon owns parcel; however it is contested'parcel; he noted'that'Vincent Johnson paid taxes on the parcel for 30 years.. The Chairman closed'the public hearing and the Commission discussed the request. Meyer stated he didn't think the building lot size that is available above the 929.4 contours is appropriate'on Tracts A or D; while legal, didn't think .appropriate for Mound. Reese questioned that applicant will want to be pu]ling docks for the 44 foot wide lot. Both Hayer and Reese are against creat'ing bowling a]]ey lots. Coddon stated al1 buildings wi]l be at'least '20 feet apart; that the aesthetics fit very we1], and.the setbacks and stan- dards will be met. Meyer would ]ike Commission to do some planning. Jensen moved and Andersen seconded amotion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat contingent upon the conditions in Cameron~s report; i.e. 1') Applicant be responsible for furnishing water service to al1 four lots; 2) Arrangements be made to pay 3 deficient street unit charges in the amount of $5,48q.~5 at the time of final plat approval; 3) Furnish the appropriate drainage and'utility easements'to the City; and in addition, q) Addition that deeded right-of-way question be settled; 5) that applican't get MC~D approval; 6)3 park dedication charges be assessed; and 7) All buildlngs will conform to the Zoning Ordinance and no variances be granted. The vote on the motion was all in favor except Meyer was opposed. The public hearing will be set to come before the Council on"Narch 10, 1987. ICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND 1121 VILLAGE OF MOUND ~~ FEE OWNER PLAT PARCEL Location and complete legal description of property to be divid~ P,I.o, 13' i 1'3 -/i~'-,~f- ~¥- ooo '~_ To be divided u follows: .. ~ O~L of~e So~ ~ ' ' All suppo~tln~-8ocu~nts~"such, as sketch p~ahs~,surve~s'~ at,taF~nts~ etc. ~us~ ~ su'~itt'ed :Ih ~' 'x ]1'~ size '~n~/o~. I~ .copies plus~ one 8~" 'x i I", cop~. (a~ ~ff or sule d~i~ s~ing adja~ s~.~, dime~i~ ~ p~ ~ilding sites, ~are f~t area of ea~ ~ ~rcii ~si~t~ by ~r) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot No. Reason: S~uare feet TO APPLICANT ADDRESS Applicant's interest in the properly: Square feet This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explen- 'etlon given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: K 1967 Aerial Photo) Shore line according to record plat. CITY OF HOUND Hound, Hinnesota CASE NO. 87-~.11 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED VACATIONS TO %4HOH I T HAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing ~.Ill be held at the Hound City Hall, 53ql Naywood Road, at 7:30 P.H.,.on Tuesday, the lOth day of Hatch_ 1987, to cons. lder the vacation of the-following described portion of street, and easements:. · - TheY ~art of Lynwood' Boulevard (plat'~ed as Dell Street I~"RCOEHLER~S. 1) Part of ADDITION TO MOUND" LAKE NINI~ETOI~A, according ~ ~ba recorded plat Lyn ...vfpod thereof) which I les northerly of the following described line: Cmeenclng-st the southeast cor~er of L~ 5 of said ,KO~LER,S ADDITION TO MOUND. LAKE HINNETOMCAj ?hen~ on an assu~ed bearing of North along ~he east line of said 'Lot 5 a dlstange of 10,00" fee? t~ ~he point of beginning.of ~ha I Inn ~o be desgrlbed; ?hange · ' South 89 degrees 28 mlnu~es 4t seconds Nest, tt.63 feet! thmtga southwesterly 30~.f3 feet along a ~engantlal curve, concave ~o the southeast, having a central angle of 1t degrees 34 mlq,,u*t~ 35 seconds, end a radius of 1116.48 Yoetl thence South '33 degrees 54 minutes 10 seconds Wes4', tangent to tho Inet des~lbed curve,'.- 17,?? ~eeyS thence so~hwestorly 60.51 feet along a l'angentlal ". cur*va, concave ~o ~ho nc,-rhveey, having' s con~al anglo at 5 · degrees .41 minutes 28 seconds and a radius of 609.17 feet, 4*o the ' vest line of Lo1' 44 of sold "KOEI4LERtS ADDITION TO 140UND"~LA~£ FJlNNETONY, A, and said I lee there ~ormlneytno. Reserving ~o the (::1~ of Nounal a poflnanent oasem~nt'fm: dr~,lfiag'o nd' utility,' purposes over, under and across all of 'tho above described Lynwood Boulevard. . . . ._. ,... · Tim '~uth 1,00 foe+ of ~het parr of the so~hveet Querre~ of the' 2) Street southwest qunrror of sac-t'ton 13, Township 117, Range 24, which lies · Easement north of'Lot· t, UKOEHLER~S ADDITION TO MOUNDs LAKE 14INHETOI~<A, according · ~o tho racorded plat thereof, end which lies' vest of Lo? 2 of said uKO~I. ER*S ADDITION TO MOUNDu I.N<£ MINFIETOItC~. ALSO, '. TheY p,;rr 'of Lot 1, ,KOEHLERvS ADDITION TO MOUND% LAX£ HINk~r(x~,A, according to ~he recorded pla~ thereof, which lies northerly of ~ho fei lowing deocrlbed lines Ccxmenctng at tho southeast corner of ~ 5 of sal'd "KO~LER'S. ADDITION TO MOtJND" LAKE FtlNNETONY, A; thence on an ess'used bearing' of Nor-th along the oust line of said LO~ I a dial*anco of I0.00 fee~ to the. point of beginning of the line ~o bo descrfbods thence sout[~ Og degrees 28 minutes 45 seconds West, 5t.6~ feets thence so~hwesteriy ~0~.53 feet along a tangential curve, concave to tho southeast, havlno a central angle of 15 degrees 34 clauses 35 '.:seconds,. and a radius of 1116.48 feet, and said line .there. te'flntnattng. Resolving +o ~ho ¢11'y of Nound a por~mnont oesemen.~ for drainage and utility ,purposes over, under and ac~oss alt that parr of the above. described .Lot 1, BKOEI'IL.F.J~tS ADDITION TO MOUI~D# LA~E MINl~"rol4qA. 3) Street Easement heard at Tha't'~O~ of Lots 2, 3, 4 and' 5, .KOEHLEROS ADDITION TO MOUND" 'LAKE · MINNETONr, A, according to tho recorded plat thereof, which lies northerly 'of tho fei lowing described I Inn.* Commencing at tho southeast corner of Lot 5 of said "KO~LEReS. ADDITION TO MOUND" LAKE ~IINNETOI~<A; thence on an assuaed bearing of North along the east line of said Lot 5 a distance of 10.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 89 degrees 28 minutes 45 seconds iVes'r, 55.6~ fae~; 4'hence southwe~erly 305.5~ fee~ along a tangential curve, concave to tho southeast, having a central angle of 15 degrees ~4 minutes ~5 · seconds, and. a radius of 1116.48 feet, and said line there terminating. , Such persons as desire to be heard wlth reference to ~_he. a~ove will be this meeting. ~/'/~/_x~2. ~ r~ Francene C. 1'a Clerk McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTIN(~ ENI~INE[R$ I LAND SURVEYORS ! PLANNERS Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard February 3, 1987 Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Ms. San Bertrand Planning & Zoning City of Mobnd 5341Maywood Road Hound, Hinnesota SUBOECT: Street Vacation (Lynwood Blvd) Case #87-611 HKA File ~6689 Dear 3an: As you requested, we have reviewed the vacation request submitted by ~RW Properties for a portion of Lynwood Boulevard (platted as Dell Street). There are actually two separate vacations included in this application. The first part of the request is for vacation of that part of the original platted right-of-way of Lynwood Boulevard which is no longer required for street purposes. This is due to the relocation of a portion of Lynwood Boulevard during reconstruction last scmmer. The attached plan indicates the proposed street vacation as parcel 1. We have reviewed the description submitted and find it to be in order. You will note that the City will be retaining drainage and utility easements over the entire portion of the vacated street. The second part of the request covers vacation of a street easement the City has over the 26 feet northeriy and adjacent to the piatted right-of-way of Lynwood BouIevard. This easement vacation is covered by two separate iegaI descriptions. The description for the portion designated as parcei 2 on the attached pian aiso retains drainage and utiiity easements for the City. This is necessary because of the sanitary sewer iocation and a Minnegasco gas main. The second portion of this easement vacation is indicated as parceI 3 on the attached pIan which does not retain any of the easements for the City. For your information, we have included a third parcel of p~operty on the enclosed plan indicated as parcel 4. This small triangular piece of land is a portion of the Anderson building property which the City no longer has a need for, therefore, title could be transferred to 3RW Properties. Drainage and utility easements would also be retained by the City over this entire parcel. We recommend approval of the street vacation and easement vacation as presented. If you have any questions or require additionai information, piease contact us. Very truiy yours, HcCOHBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 3ohn Cameron 3C:cah COMMERCE BI.VD, STA. 7+71.11 '1 P,C. 5+55.55 C.S.A.H. IIO rtl .It //, Planning Commission Hinutes February ~, lg87' Case No. 87-611 .Publlc'Hearing on Vacation of Part of Lynwood Boulevard 'and 2 Street'Easements '(near corner of Lynwood Boulevard and Commerce Blvd.) Al! in Koehler~s Addition to HOund Beth Andrews, Attorney representing JRW Properties, was present. The City Engineer, John Cameron, explained that this was the result of tl~e relocation of LynWood Boulevard and the owner of Commerce Place have reqbested that the Ci. ty.rellnquish their rights to the portion of the property they do not need any longer. Parcel 1 is the dedicated right-of-way of Lynwood Boule- vard (before relocation) and street portion is not needed, but the City.has numerous· utilities located in there and we need to retain the utility ease- ments. Parcels 2 and 3 were street easements granted to the City at one.time; while they are not needed for street, Parcel 2 has a gas main and sanitary sewer in it and a utility easement should be retained. Parcel 3 is clear and they recommend all easements be vacated on' Parcel 3. Beth Andrews stated this land may be occupied With some landscaping, but this property.was originally comtemplated that the shopping center really occupied · everything north of. Lynwood Boulevard realigned. ~he'Chairman opened the publlc hearing and as .there were no' other questiOns" o~ Comments; he closed the public hearing. ' Jensen moved an'd Ken Smith seconded a motlon to move the staff recommenda- tion and vacate. The vote was unanimously in favor. The Council w|11 set the public hearing for March 10, 1~87. APPLICATION FOR STREET VACATION CITY OF HOUND APPLICANT JRW Properties, Inc. 3/8q CASE a0. FT- / / FEE DATE FI LEO ADDRESS 88 South Sixth Street, Suite 925 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY APPLICANT: PID # ~ attached Exhibit A (Property located at 2200 ~ Boulevard, Mound, Minnesota) LOT BLOCK SUBDI V I S I ON STREET TO BE VACATED A strip of Lynwood Boulevard (platted as Dell Street) - as it was located prior to its current realignment. See the attached Exhibit B for the ~-evious and present location of Lynwood Boulevard. REASON FOR REQUEST Lynwood Boulevard as it was Iocated prior to its current reali¥~.~ent is no longer in use as a public street. BRIGGSANDMOBSAN (Attorney forApplicant) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT By_: Elizabeth J.'Andrews ADDRESS 2200 First National Bank Buildina Saint Pa~l, Minnesota55101 TEL. NO. 291-1215 Appl|cant's Interest in Property Jl~7~es, I.~c. and ~ C~tyofMo~ndaze fee owners of the pmoperty. Residents and owners of property abutting the street to be vacated: (Please:attach list. Certifled mailing list can be obtained from Hennepin County by calling 3q8-3271) Recommended by Utilities: NSP .; Hinnegasco ; Continental Telephone Recommended by City: Public Works ; Fire Chief ; Engineer ; Chief ,.; Cable Systems ; Other Departments Planni6g Commission Recommendation: Police Date Council Action Resolution No. Date 'l-' ill ,r. ? -- ' ¢. // CO I. i Parcel 1 P~opos~d Resolution Case No. 87-611 P~SOLUTION NO. 87- REsoLUTION VACATING CERTAIN STREET EASEFENTS 'OVER PART OF LYNWOOD BOULEVARD (PLATTED AS DEll STREET) AND RETATNING FO~ THE CTTY D~AINAGE AND UTILITY EAS~NTS W~EREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 provides that the City CounciI may by resoiution vacate any street, ailey, pubiic grounds, or public way, or any part thereof, when it appears in the interest of the public to do so; and WHEREAS,.the City of Mound has claimed a street and utiiity easement over the foiiowing described land: Part of Lynwood Boulevard, formerly known as Deil Street, as donated and dedicated to the pubiic and shown on the piat of "KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND" LAKE MINNETONKA, according to the recorded piat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on March 10, 1987, as required by law; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that good area planning requires that these easements be vacated and that a portion be retained as a drainage and utility easement and that it wouid be in the public interest to do so. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T_.RESOLVED that the 'City Council of the City of Mound,' Minnesota, hereby vacates: That pa~t of Lynwood Boulevard (platted as Dell Street in "KOEH~FR'S ADDITION TO MOUND" LAKE MINNETONKA, according to the recorded piat thereof) which i~es northerIy of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast co~ner of Lot 5 of'said "KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND" LAKE MINNETO~<A; thence on an assumed bearing of North aIong the east iine of said Lot 5 a distance of iO.O0 feet to the point of beginning of the iine to be described; thence South 89 degrees 28 minutes 45 seconds West, 55.63 feet; thence southwesterly ~0~.5~ feet along a tangential curve, concave to the southeast, having a central angle of 15 degrees N4minutes 35 seconds, and a radius of 1116.48 feet; thence South 7~ degrees 54 minutes iO seconds West, tangent to the last described curve, 17.77 feet; thence southwesterly 60.51 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the northwest, having .a central angle at 5 degrees 41minutes 28 seconds and a radius of 609.17 feet, to the west line of Lot 44 of said "KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO~ MOUND" LAKE MINNETONKA, and said line there te~nating. Reserving to the City of Mound a permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under and across all of the above described Lynwood Boulevard. A certified copy of this resoiution shall be prepared by the City Cierk and shall be a notice of completion of the p~oceedings and shall be recorded in the offlce of the County Recorder and/or the Registrar of Titles as set forth in M.SoA. 412.851. Parcel 2 t Proposed Resolution Case No. 87-63.l RESOLUTION NO. 87- 'RESOLUTZON VACATING CERTAIN S'~DE~NT OVER The South 1.00 foot of that part of the Southwest ~uarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 1~, Township. il7, Range 24, which //es north of Lot l, "KOEHLER. 'S ADDITION TO MOUND" L~E MINN=-TONKA, according to the recorded plat thereof, and which lies west of Lot 2 of said "KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOIN~" L~J<E MIJ~NETONKA. ALSO, Part of Lot l, "KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO HOUND" LAKE MIN~ETON~A, according 'to the recorded plat thereof. WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 provides that the City Council may by resolution vacate any street, alley, public grounds, or public way, or any part thereof, when it appears in the interest of the public to do so; and M4DREAS, the City of Mound has claimed a street and utility easement over the following described land: The south 1.00 foot of that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 1), Township 117, Range 24, which //es north of Lot 1, "KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUhD" LAKE MINNETONKA, according to the recorded plat thereof, and which lies west of Lot 2 of said "KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND" LAKE MINNETONKA. ALSO, Lot 1, "KOEHLER'S 'ADDITION TO MOUND" LAKE MINNETON(A, according to the rec6rded Plat thereof. W~REAS, a public hearing was on March 10, 3~87, as required by law; and WheREAS, it has been detezmined that good area planning requires ~hat these easements be vacated and that a portion be retained as a d~ainage and utility easement and that it would be in the public interest to do so. NOW, ll~'REF~, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, ~Ltnnesota, hereby vacates the street easement over the foilowin9 described land: The south 1.00 foot of that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 1), Township 117, Range 24, which lies north of Lot 1, "KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND" LAKE MINNETONKA, according to the recorded plat thereof, and which lies west of Lot 2 of said "KO~HLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND" LAKE MINN~TONKA. ALSO, · That part of Lot l, "KOEHLER'SADDITION TO MOUND" LAK~MINNETObI<A" according to the recorded plat thereof, which iies northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of Lot 5 of.said "KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND" LAKE MINh~-TOh~<A; thence on an assumed bearing of North along the east line of said Lot 5 a distance of lO.O0 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 89 degrees 28 minutes 45 seconds West, 55.6) feet; thence southwesterly 30).5) feet along a tangential ctmve, .concave to the southeast, having a centrai angle of 15 degrees )4 minutes )5 seconds; and a radius of 1116.48 feet, and said line there terminating. Reserving to the City of Mound a permanent easement for drainage and utility puzposes over, under and across all that pa~t of the above described Lot 1, "KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND" LAKE MINNETONKA. A certified copy of this resolution shall be p~epared by the City Clerk and shall be a notice of completion of the proceedings and shall be recorded in the office of theCounty ReCorder and/orthe Registrar of Titles as set forth in M.S.A. 412.851. ~arcel 3 Proposed Resolution Case No. 87-611 F~.SOLUTZON NO. RESOLUTION VACATING CE~TA~ STREET AND UTIITTY EAS~NTS OVeR PART OF LOTS 2, 3, z~, AND 5, "KOEHLE~'S ADDITTON TO HOUND" LAKE NTNt~ONKA W~-REAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 provides that the City Council may by resolution vacate any street, alley, public grounds, or public way, or any part' thereof,' when it appears in the interest of the public to do so; and W~REAS, the' City of Hound has claimed a street and utility easement over .. the following described land: Part of the south 26.00 feet of Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, "KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO NOUND" LAKE MINNETONKA, according to the recorded plat thereof. and public hearing was held on March lO, 1987, as.~equired by law; WHEREAS, it has been determined that good area planning requires that these ~asements be vacated and that it would be in the public interest to do so. NOW, T~ORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby vacates all easements over the following described land: That part o? the south 26.00 feet o? Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5, "KOEHLER'S ADDITION TO MOUND" LAKE MINNETONKA, according to the recorded plat thereof, which lies northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner o? Lot 5 o? said "KOEHmFR'S ADDITION TO HOUND" LAKE HINNETO~<A; thence on an assumed bearing of North along the east line of said Lot 5 a distance of lO.O0 feet to the point o? beginning o? the line to be described; thence South 89 degrees 28 minutes 45 seCOnds West, 55.63 feet; thence southwesterly 303.53 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the southeast, having a central angle o? 15 degrees 34 minutes 35 seconds, and a radius of 1116.~8 feet,' and said line there terminating. A certified copy of this resolution shall be prepared by the City Cle~k'and shall be a notice of completion o? the proceedings and shall be-recorded in the office of the County Recorder and/or the Registrar of Titles as set forth in N.S.A. 412.851. CASE NO. 87~-612 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING IO GONSIDER ~ OF SECTION 23.625.3 OF THE MOUND ZONING fDDE TO ADD CLASS II RESTAURANTS (FAST FOOD, O065~ENIENCE AND DRIVE-IN) AS A GONDITIONAL USE. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on TuesdaY? March.~0.~ 1987, at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall, 5341 Maywood R~ad, Moun~, Minnesota, a hearing will be held to consider modifying Section 23.625.3 of the Mo~d Zonin~ Code to allow Class II restaurants by conditional use permits. Class II restaurants include fast food, convenience and drive-in facilities. All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the opportunity to be heard. Francene C. Cla~k, City Clerk AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 23.625.3 OF THE MOUND CODE OF ORDINANCES ADDING RESTAURANTS (CLASS II) AS CONDITIONAL USES The City of Mou~d does ordain: Section 23.625.3 of the Mo~d Code of Ordinances is amended as follows: The listing of uses allowed by Conditional Use Permit shall also include "Restaurants (Class II)." Mayor Attest: City Clerk 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 TO: Planning Commission and Staff FRf~: Mark Koegler, City Planner ~: Feb~ry 3, 1987 SOBJECT: Zoning Ordinance ~e~t APt~[.~: Glen Olson CASE NO: 87-612 %~S FILE NO: 87-310-A9-Z0 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to amend the provisions of the Central Business District (B-I) to allow Class II restaurants as conditional uses. Class II restaurants are defined as fast-foot, convenience and drive-in restaurants where a majority of customers order and are served their food at a counter in packages prepared to leave the premises; or are able to be taken to a table, counter, automobile or off the premises to be consumed; or a drive-in where most customers consume their food in an automobile regardless of how it is served. When the zoning ordinance was amended in 1983, Class II restaurants were not included in the B-1 zone due to the desire to preserve B-1 land for more intensive, less automobile oriented commercial uses. Since that time, additional information has become available which seems to indicate that a review of this decisioo is appropriate. Mound presently has a significant area zoned B-1. Although focusing on the Lost Lake site, the Highest and Best Use Study for the Lost Lake property completed ' by the Maxfield Research Group provided a general overview of future business activity in Mound. The study generally found that specialty retail, general retail and office uses were not likely to grow significantly due to a lack of tmmatisfied demand. In light of this finding, it seems reasonable to review the downtown area to see if additional restaurant development my be appropriate in lieu of other coa~ercial ventures. o /,,la...., The nature of fast-food/convenient restaurants also seems to have changed in recent years. Restaurants have g~ne to an emphasis on take-out food and recent facilities exclude in-car consumgtion of food. Pizza restaurants such as Dominos, Gina Maria's (proposed new use), Paul Revere's and other such as Leeann Chin offer extensive delivery service an(] few if any tables for in-house consu~pti~. These types of facilities are small in scale and have less traffic conflicts, [~rticularl¥ if the facility emphasizes delivery services. ~: In light of the changes noted above, it seems reasonable to allow at least' small scale convenience/fast-food restaurants in the B-1 district. If the . Planning Oomnissio. agrees with this position, it has two options: Modify the ordinance to allow Class II restaurants as conditional uses"~n fha B-! zone; or If the (k~mission has concerns about large scale fast-food installations fn the CBD area, it could limit the size of Class II restaurants allowed~ by conditional use permit to those less than 2,000 square feet in gross floor area o Planning Commission Hinutes February 9, 1987' 6A. Case No. 87-612 Public Hearing on Amendment of Section 23.625.3 of the Zoning Code to add Class II Restaurants (Fast Food, Convenience and Drive-In) 'as a-Condit, ional Use The City Planner reviewed his report and stated that if this amendment was not approved, there will be no review of the second case (87-613). He .stated that since 1983, there'have been some changes and new information that lends 'credence that this amendment should be reviewed. Recent study found that there did not seem to be a significant demand for office, general or specialty retail. Fast food business have changed somewhat and take-out restaurants are becoming very numerous, particularly ones. that offer deli.very services, that it may be a good idea to see if there is room in the B-1 for certain types of take'out, Convenience foods, while still a11owlng enough room for future commercial purposes. It was noted that any' change applies to all the B-1. Commission questioned where Captain Billy's fits. It is primarily a liquor set do~n type Of restaurant. Jensen asked Vern Andersen for. his thoughtS on this ~se:' as he's a downtown businessman. He feels people would welcome any business; an~ he can see no problem with this. This is close to the Pond Arena, young people d~nft have to get into cars to get snacE. Weiland commented that any growth W°uld'put restaurant in another classification with table area. The Chairman opened the public hearing and as no one responded, he closed the public hearing. The Commission brlefly discussed the options in the staff report. Ken.-Smith moved and Meyer seconded a motion to recomn~nd staff recommenda- tion - Option .1 to. the City Council. The vote was unanimously 'in favor. The City Council will set the public hearing for Hatch 10, 1987. CASE NO. 87-613 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota NCrfI~OF PUBLIC fIEARINGTOCDNSI~~ ISSUANC~ OF A CDNDITIONALUSE PERMIT FORT HE OPERATION OF A FAST FOOD, ~CE, DRIVE-IN~AURANT (CLASS II) LOC~AT 2244A(I)MMERCE BOULEV~. NOTIC~ IS HERt~¥ GIVEN that on Tuesdoy. March 10th. 1987, at 7:30 p.m. 'at the City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road, Mc~nd, Minnesota, a hearing will be held on ~ issuance of a conditional use permit for the 'establishment of a Class II restaurant at 2244A Commerce Boulevard~ The proposed use consists of a Gina Maria's Pizza restaurant offering delivery and take-out food. All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the opportunity to be Francene C. Clark, City Clerk RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A OONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ~ INSTALLATION OF CLASS II RESTAURANT IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS (B-l) DISTRICT AT 2240 (I)MMERCE BOULEVARD (PID # 13 117 24 33 0042/0043) WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 10, 1987, pursuant to Section 23.505 of the Mound Code of Ordinances to consider the issuance of a conditional use permit for the installation of a Class II restaurant at 2240 Commerce Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the proposed conditional use permit satisfies the criteria for granting conditional use permits as stated in Section 23.505.1 of the Mound Code of Ordinances; and WHEREAS, all persons wishing to be heard were heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the conditional use permit is granted for the Class II restaurant subject to the following conditions: The restaurant shall secure all appropriate licenses from the State Health Department. 2. Video games shall be licensed by the City of Mound. 3. Delivery vehicles shall not be parked overnight on the premises or within public CBD parking. 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 6173553.1950 Planning O~missio. and Staff Mark Ko.gl.r, City Planner DATE= February 4, 1987 so~]~cr: emditional Use Permit - Gina Maria's Restaurant CaSE RP= 87-613 VEL~ F]~E NO-. 87-310-A14-Z0 APPLICanT: Glen Olso~ 2240 Commerce Boulevagd E~TING ~gNING: Central Business (B-l) ~ P~%N-. (Imu~ercial PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of the conditiona/ use permit for the installation of a take-out/delivery pizza restaurant. The restaurant which is know as Gina Maria's will occupy approximately 1,128 square feet in space number 3 in the Mu.lief/Lansing Center (old Super Valu grocery store). The business consists of a kitchen area, customer counter and a waiting area with vic~o games. Parking for the proposed business will be accoemodated in the shopping center's surface lot. The facility will employ approximately 5-6 people per shift (total employment approximately 20) an~ private ar~ company vehicles will be used for deliveries. The existing surface lot has adequate capacity to accommodate both customer and employee parking. RE~ATI(~N= Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for the operation of Gina Maria's restaurant subject to the following conditions: The restaurant shall secure all appropriate licenses fr~m the State Health Department. Video games shall be licensed by the City of Mound. Delivery vehicles shall not be parked on the premises or within public CBD parking over night. Planning Commission Minutes February 9, 1987 ~B. Case No. 87-613 Publlc Hearlng.'to consider the issuance Of Condltlonal Use Permit for the operation of a fast food, convenience, drlve-ln restaurant (Class II) at 224qA Commerce Boulevard; Metes & Bounds Oesc., Koehler's Addition to Hound; PID Numbers 13-117-24 33 'Applicant Glen 01son was present. 'The City Pl.anner reviewed his report'and recommended approval of the cond|- tional use permit for the'operation of Gina Haria's restaurant subject to 3 conditions. Glen 01son introduced Stege'Olson~ his partner, and .Barry Johnson, the person who will manege.the proposed Mound "Gina Maria's .restaurant. 01son explained his operation,..that they'have2 other locations,.one in Hlnnetonka and one in.Eden Prairie.' ~eneralty,.they have about 5 or 6 people working; total persons employed will be about 20;'they'll be hired locally and range in age from 18/1~ to 30.. The company has a couple of'vehlcles; delivery people :provide own vehicles and own insurance, etc.; hours .they are pro- posing are from 4 to midnight Monday through Thursday; Friday and Saturday 4 to 1A.H.; and Sundays from 3 to 11 P.M. They posslbly might do lunches from 11 to 1:30 P.M. The'ratio of delivery'to take out is' 40/60. He questioned If they would be able to have a couple of tables for people to eat at "on.the run"? He feels:location is good with Con~nunlty Center, Arena, etc. so close. In response to question on the video games, he stated it was a food place.first and customers use videos while waiting for food. In re- sponse to .a question on clean up, he said they were'just as concerned about - a clean operation., loitering as cranking out a good pizza. They do not want to be a hangout for kids. They clean |mmediate area and are concerned about image. The Chairman opened the public hearing. Hike Hueller and Phil Hasch were in favor of.the restaurant. The.Chairman then closed the public hearing. Smith moved and Andersen seconded a motion to recommend acceptlng staff recommendation with the 3 conditions and approving subject tothemhavlng the amendment.passed. .The vote was unanimously in favor. The City Council will set the public hearing for March 10, 1~87. c I OF MOUND . '~'*: '~-'--. ~.-.~.~__.~L_.~ z~,!, APPLICATION TO PLANNING ~ ZONING COHHISSION .1~:-,-, , ':.~.~:" ~,t~,~';:~ ~i (Please type the foll~lng infor~tlon) 1. Street Address of Property ~~ ~, ~~ Case'No..~-** ,~ Fee Paid ~a. e~ Da~e Flied.. 2. Legal DesCription of Property: Lot Metes & Bounds Block Addition Koehler's Addn. to Hound PlO .o. 15 3 Address ~~0 ~ ~ ?~ ~. Applicant (i.f other than ownS): 5. Type of R~quest: ( ) Varlance (~ C°nditlonal Use Permit ~~endment (') Zoning Interpretation ~ Review ( ) Sign Permlt ( ) ~etland Permit ( ) P,U,D, ( )*Other *If other, specify: 6..Present Zoning District 7. Existing Use(s) of Property ® Mas an appllcatlon ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or .other zoning procedure for this property? /~J o if so, list date(s) of 'list date(s) of appllcatlon, action taken and'prov'ide Resolution No.(s) Copies of prev~bus resoluti~ns ~hall accompany present request. I certify that all of the. above statements .and the statements contained 'In any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith 'are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in thls appllcatlon by any authorized offlclal of the City of Hbund for the purpose of Inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be req~l~ ~, ~ / ~/~'~ Signature of Appl. icant, . Date ! ~ Plannlng Commission Recommendation: , Counci1 Action: Date Resolution No. · Prqcedure for Zoning Amendments 0. Locatlon of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any addltlonal information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections III.An Amendment to the Zonin9 Ordinance (Answer elther.'A or B below) ~ It is requested that section ~t~,~'~, of the Zoning Ordinance be amended . Amendment to Hap:. -' .It is requested that the property described below and shown on the attached s~te plan be rezoned'from ............ to Address of Property: .... Legal descriptlon of property (lot~ block, subdivision or metes'and bounds) Attach addltional sheets, if necessary) Presedt Use of Property:. Reason for Amendment: ~ote: No application of a property owner for an amendment to the text of the ordi- nance or the zoning map shall be considered by the Plannlng Commissi~p within one year period following a denlal of such request. Procedure for Conditlonal Use Permit (2) Case # ~'~7 ~'~/~ 0. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utllitles, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction. ' F. Any additional Information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. III Request for a Conditional Use A. All Information requested below, a site plan as described In Part II, and a development schedule providing reasonable guarantees for the complet.lon of the construction must be provided before a hearing wI11 be scheduled. B. 'TYpe of development for whlch a Conditional Use Permit Is requested: 1. Conditional Use (Speclfy): F~Or~7'' ~"'Oo~ CoA)~/~,)~c~ ,. 2. 'Current Zoning and Designation in the future Land Use Plan for I~ound Oevelopment Schedule: 1. A development schedule shall be attached to this appllcatlon providing reasonable guarantees for th~ completion of the proposed development. 2. Estimate of cost of. the project: Sr~'~,~)l~ ~ Oen~lty (for residential developments only): Number of structures: .Dwelling Units Per Structure: a. Number of type: '. Efficiency ' 2 Bedroom 1 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 3. Lot area per.dwe.lllng unit: q. Total.lot area: IV. Effects of the Proposed Use A. List impacts the proposed use ~vlll have on property in the vlcl'nity, in- cluding, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and, describe the steps taken .to mitigate or eliminate the Impacts. Jl . 1.3 "I ! CASE NO. 87-614 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ODNSIDER APPROVAL OF A (I)NDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES TO ADD TWD ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO AN EXISTING 4-PLEX LOCATED AT 4810 NORTHERN BOAD (PID NOS. 13-117-24-44075, 076 AND 087) IN THE B-2, GENERAL BUSINESS ZONE. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tues4aY, March ]0, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall, 5341MaywoodRoad, Mound, Minnesota, a hearing will be held to consider the approval of a conditional use permit to add two attached residential units to an existing 4-plex at 4810 Northern Road. The proposal also involves front and side yard variances. All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the opportunity to be heard. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A fDNDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING AT 4810 NORTHERN WHEREAS,' the City Council held a public hearing on March 10, 1987, pursuant to Section 23.505 of the Mound Zoning Code, to consider the issuance of a conditional use permit for construction of a multiple family dwelling (2 new units, 4 existing units) and a side yard setback variance; and WHEREAS, multiple family dwellings are allowed in the General Business (B-2) zone by conditional use permit in accordance with Section 23.630.3 of the Mo~d Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested the recognition of an existing 18 foot side yard variance; and WHEREAS, the propose~ variance satisfies the criteria 'for Granting variances as stated in Section 23.505.1 of the Mound Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, all persons wishing to be heard were heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the Conditional Use Permits and Variance are granted for the multilple family dwelling subject to the following conditions: r ck. Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be reviewed and approved by the city engineer. A landscaping plan will be prepared, reviewed and approved by the city planner. The proposal shall be reviewed and approved by the Watershed District. 5. The applicant shall establish a $750.00 escrow account. 6. Construction of the new units shall require payment of a $300.00 park dedication fee. 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 · O: Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner DATE: February 4, 1987 SUBJIDCr: Conditional Use Permit and Variance - Addition to Multi-Family Structure APPLI~: Phfllip and Eva Basch CASE NO: 86-560 and '87-614 FILE NO: 86-310-A39-Z0 LOCJiTION: 4810 Northern Road !~IS13/~ ZONING: General Business (B-2) Business PROPOSAL: four-plex. structure. l~mit. The applicant is proposing to add two attached units to an existing The new units will be connected by a roof section to the existing Multiple family uses are allowed in the B-2 zone by conditional use The site plan indicates that each of the new units will have a garage stall. Additional parking includes an. existing garage, six surface stalls and three spaces in. front of garage doors for a total of 12 spaces. The construction of the new t~o unit addition will require the removal of one existing single family res idence. As proposed, approval of the new addition will require recognition of an existing variance and approval of a new variance. In cases such as this, the B-2 zone requirements are applied in the R-4 multi-familyrequirementsare used as a general guide. ~: The B-2 zone requires a total lot area of 20,000 square feet and 30 foot front, side and rear yard setbacks. The existing four-plex sits 12 feet from the side lot line requiring recognition of an existing 18 foot variance. The site plan shows a 24 foot front yard setback requiring a six foot variance. The applicant has stated that the front yard variance is due to soil conditions. A review of soil boring information seems to indicate that soil corrections will be necessary regardless of building placement. The proposed addition has a rear yard setback of 72 feet. The ordinance requires 2 1/2 parking spaces for each dwelling ~nit and one of the spaces must be covered. Based upon six units, 15 spaces are required. The site plan contains parking spaces abutting the three garages. This can ~e counted as allowable parking provided that access of maneuvering room is adequate. Under the proposed configuration, it is possible that a vehicle 'parking in the driveway of the western new unit will block access to the existing ~arage and approach driveway area. RECOMMENDATION: The proposed addition constitutes an improvement to the existing property and removes two existing nonconforming uses. As Uroposed, the approval will require reixxjnition of the existing 18 foot side yard variance, approval of a 6 foot front yard variance and the variance from the required number of parking stalls. Of the proposed variances, the side yard variance and parking variance seem reasonable considering existing conditions. The front yard variance, however, does not seem to be necessary and if the building were moved six feet to the north, parking/driveway circulation would be improved. Staff recoam~r, ds approval of the conditlonal use permit, recognition of the existing 18 foot side yard variance and approval of the l~rking variance subject to the following conditions: The'proposed structure shall be moved six feet to the north resulting in a conforming f--runt yard setback. 0 Grading, drainage and utility plans shall be reviewed and approved by the city engineer. A landscaping plan will be prepared, reviewed and approved by the city planner. 4. The peoposal shall be reviewed and approved by the Watershed District. 5. The applicant shall establish a 8750.00 escrow accost. P~ann~n~ Commission H~nutes February 9, 1987' Case No. 87-614 Public Hearing on issuance of Conditional Use Permit and VarianCes to add two attached residential units to an existing ~-Plex at .h810 Northern Road; Part of Lots2h, 25 and 26, Subd. of Lots 1S 32, Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood; PID Numbers 13-117-2q ~ 0075/0075/0087 Phillip & Eva Hasch were present. '. Hark Koegler reviewed his report and the staff 'is recommending approval of the conditlonal use permit, recognition of the existing 18 foot side yard variance and approval of the parking variance subject to a number of conditions, one of which is not approving the front yard setback varl- ance. He commented that in talking with Hr. Hasch, he thought he could relocate the building back six feet and make that conformlng.'ln addition to the 5 conditions listing in his report, Koegler suggested adding # 6. Appl. icaht post a bond to guarantee removal of the existing sing1e family'. house. Hr. Hasch didn"t have anything tO add, but questioned the amouht of bond that would be required. .It was suggested about $5,000. would be required. The Chairman Opened the public, hearing'; there being no one wanting to speak,;Chairman closed the public hearing. Smith mo~ed and Weiland seconded a motion to recommend accepting the staff"s recommendation for approval wlth the 6 conditions. The vote was unanimously' in favor. The pub'lic hearing will be set by the City'Counci1 for Hatch 10, 1~87. I lease type the following information) Property ~1 ~!0 - ~0~0 Legal DesCription of Property: Lot p~o~ ~ ~5 ~& i ~ ; : . I ~ Addition ' . [ ~ Address ~AH~ v~,~.~ ~~ ' ~ ' - '~=. ~-~ o s~ ~"~ ~Fa - -~ ~ ~ ~ Case '.o. ?~- ~ / ~ I 0/2~7 C ' TM OF II1~0 U N D Fee'Paid ~ ~' ~'11 Date Fi led Blockc~:Le.~ !~, ~_ PlO No. 13-1 Day Phone No. 4. Applicant (if other than owner): Name ~l~lP_.. , Day Phone No. Address Type of Request: Variance (~(~) ConditiOnal Use Permit Zoning Interpretation & Review ~etland Permit ( ) P.U.D. *If other,.specify: present Zoning District ( ).Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other Existing Use(s) of Property FoUF-?L~-~ " Has an application ever been made for zonlng, variance, or conditional use permit or · other zoning procedure for this property? HC) If so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provlde Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the above statements .and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described In this application by any authorized-offlclal of the City of H~und for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removlng such notices as may be required by law. Signature of Appl. icant Date Planning Con~ission Recon~endation: Da t e Council Action: Resolution No. Request for Zoni.ng Variance Procedure (2) O. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc; E. Indicate North compass direction .F. Any additional information as may reasonably be-required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. III. Request for a Zoning Variance A. Be All.information below, a site plan, as described in Part II, and general application must be provided before a hearing w111 be scheduled. Ooes .the present use of. the property'conform to a11 use regulations for the zone district In which it Is located? Yes ( ) No (~,)' If "no", specify each ~on~conforming use: .Do the existing structures comply with all area height and bulk regulations for the zone d[strlct Inwhich it Is.located? Yes (~4~) No'( ) If "no', specify each non-conforming use: De Which unique physlcal characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses.permitted in that zoning district? ( ) .Too narrow ( ) Topography (/~) Soil- ( ) Too. small . ( ) Drainage ( ) Sub-surface .( ) Too shallow ( ) Shape ( ) Other: Specify: E® Was the hardship d~scribed above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the Zoning Ordinance was adopted2 Yes ( ) No (/~ If yes, explain: F. was the hardship created by anY'~,~r man-made chan?, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No If yes, explatn: Are the conditions of hardship for'which you request a variance pecullar only to the property described in this petition? Yes -(~) No ( ) If no, how many other properties are similarly affected?-- H. What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) I'' '11 ' ' / I, Will granting of the variance be materlally detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? Procedure for Conditional Use Permit Location of: Signs, easements, underground utllitles, etc. i.,.Indlcate North compass direction. (~ Any addltlonal information as may reasonably be required by the :ity Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. case ~ ~' ?- ~/'t' I!1 Request for a Condltlonal Use A. All information requested below, a site plan as described in Part II, and a development schedule providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the construction must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. 'Type of development for which a Conditional Use Permit Is requested: 1. Conditional Use (Specify): I~-,,~i ('~.,~JX-~L~ i'- 2. 'Current Zoning and Designation In the future Land Use Plan for Hound 2 De Development Schedule: -~em$ ~)-1L- )<~r~uJ y 1. A development schedule shall be attached to thls application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. 2. Estimate of cost of. the project: $.-. Density (for residential developments.only): 1. Number of structures: 1 ~ .D~e11Ing Units Per Structure: a. Number of type: '. Efficiency ' 2 Bedroom 3. Lot area per.dwelling unit: IV. Effects of the Proposed Use 1 Bedroom 3 Bedroom F=T FT. List impacts the proposed use wlll have on property in the vicinity, in- cluding, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and, describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. . . .,. ~./~ TRACT A CITY OF MOUND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING YEAR Xlll (1~87) URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM Notice is hereby given that Hennepin County and the City of Mound, pursuant to Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, are sponsoring a public hearing on March 10, 1987, at 7:30 P.M., in the Council Chambers, 5341Maywood Road to obtain the views of citizens on local and Urban County housing'and community development needs and to provide citizens with the opportunity to comment on the Urban Hennepin County Statement of Objectives/1987 and the City of Mound's proposed use of its Year Xlll Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant planning allocation of $64,822. For additional information on proposed activities, level of funding and program objectives, contact the City Manager, City of Mound, 5341Maywood Road, Mound, MN. 55364, 472-1155. The public hearing is being held in accord with the Urban Hennepin County Joint Cooperation Agreement pursuant to MoS. 471.59. Francene C. Clark, CMC City Clerk Publish in The Laker February 24, 1987. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 March 6, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR AND CITY C0UNCI L COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) YEAR Xlll PROGRAH It is again time to consider programs for the Community Development Block Grant Program administered by. Hennepin County. This is the thirteenth year' of the program, hence year XlII. CDBG. funds may be used to support and implement a wide range of housing and community development activities. The national objectives of the CDBG Program are: 1. Developing viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living envlornment and expanded economic opportunitues:principally for low and moderate income persons. 2. Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. 3. Meet other community development needs having a particular urgency. CDBG funds are federal monies, distributed from the Department of HOusing and Urban Development to urban Hennepin County. We work with a County representative, Larry Blackstad, who will be present at public hearing on determining whether or not programs are eligible, assisting us in developing programs, etc. For the past two to three years, the City of Hound has been involved with a continuing program which involves the Westonka Senior Center and its operation. We have also been involved with the Senior Citizen Counseling Program and Westonka Rides, which is a primarily Senior utilized bus program. We participate in funding these programs for Senior Citizens in the Westonka area with the cities of Orono, Spring Park and Minnetrista. An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. CDBG YEAR Xlll PROGEAM March 6, 1987 Page 2 Mound has chosen to spend a portion of its annual CDBG funds on the Senior Center Program. We have a]so spent money on economic deve]opment activities which include a two percent loan program to )ocal businesses to fix up their faci]ities or strengthen their business, participated in rehabi)it- ating homes that meet HUD and County criteria for rehabilitation for ]ow and moderate' income persons, contributed to the local domestic abuse program in this area and done several neighborhood park improvements with CDBG monies. Attached you will see several documents relating to the YEAR Xlll program for your consideration and a resolution recommending approva] of these programs for YEAR XlII. The following programs are proposed: Westonka Senior Center/Operation Senior Citizen Counseling Comprehensive P]an Update Economic Deve]opment Rehabl]itation of Private Property Tota) CDBG Funds for YEAR XlII available $14,212. 4,286. 20,000. 15,000. 11,324. $64,822. I will briefly comment on each of these programs.. Westonka Senior Center/Operation and Senior Citizen Counseling Programs As I' stated above, these two programs have been in existence for the past two to three years. The Senior Center itself is located in the Westonka Community Services Building. Mound's portion goes toward the payment of · ) the Center Di. rectors salary and fringe benefits. It also covers other related expenses and a portion of the Westonka Rides dispatch and fringe costs (see proposed 1988 Senior Center Budget). Representatives of the Westonka Senior Citizens will be present at the hearing Tuesday to answer any questions regarding their program that you may.have. Comprehensive Plan Update The City of Mound's Comprehensive Plan.was developed several years ago and has never been updated. The building official and city planner have remarked to me several times, that the comprehensive plan is an important document and one that should be kept up to date. It also is required by the Metropolitan Council under the Land Use Planning Act. This is a very important program that the staff and planning commission feel needs to be done. Economic Development We have been working with a local flrm on relocating thelr buslness within the city. There is a possibility that this firm will obtain some other loan arrangements, but the City will participate with CDBG funds. I am not able to disclose any other details on this matter at this time. CDBG YEAR Xlll PROGRAM March 6, 1987 Page 3 Rehabilitation of Private Property This is an annual program that we have that enables low and moderate income persons meeting HUD criteria for fixing up their homes as they relate to health and safety standards. The public h~aring on Tuesday evening, allows interested citizens to voice their opinions and concerns regarding the use of the CDBG program monies. The time table for this program'is July 1, 1987 through December 31, 1988. It is my belief that the above programs are very necessary and'are well worth the CDBG monies available for their implementation. If you have any questions, please contact me. ES:ls March 10, lg87 RESOLUTION ~87- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR YEAR XIII URBAN HENNEPIN COUNT~ COMMUNIT~ DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL WHEREAS, the City of Mound, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is a cooperating unit in the Urban Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice being given, a public hearing was held in accordance with Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, on March 10, 1987, at 7:30 P.M. in the Mound City Council Chambers; and WHEREAS, the following proposed use of Community Development Block Grant funds was developed and presented at the public hearing, consistent with program rules. Senior Citizen Counselling (Suburban Community Services) Senior Citizen's Center/Operation Comprehensive Plan Update Economic Development Rehab of Private Property $ 4,286. 14,212. 20,000. 15,000. 11~24. TOTAL $ 64,822. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, approved the proposed use of Year XIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds as listed above and authorizes submittal of the above proposal to Hennepin County for consideration by the Citizen Advisory Committee and for inclusion in the Year XIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Attest: City Clerk Mayor HOME OF THE WESTONKA SENIOR CITIZENS, INC. · 5600 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612)472-1600 Ext. 247 or 248 March 5, 1987 Honorable Mayor and City Council Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mayor and City Council, We are submitting our Senior Center budget to be considered for funding from the 1988 Community Development Block Grant funds. Our budget sheet is enclosed. We would like to explain the large overall (21%) increase for this next year. As you know, our coordinator is subcontracted from Senior Community Services. The Board of Directors of Senior Commu- nity Services recently studied salaries of 65 agencies which have similar senior coordinator positions and discovered their coordi- nators were receiving salaries in the lower five percentile. Be- cause they felt the agency should be more equi~able.~ about sala- ries, they raised the coordinator salary to forty-five percentile range. This really changed our budget plans. This concern was expressed at our budget meeting on March 2nd and we understand that we can expect little or no increase in future years' budgets. We will be attending the public hearing on Tuesday evening to make this request and will look forward to answering any ques- tions that you might have. Thank you for your consideration! Bernice Putt President, Westonka Senior Citizens, Inc. A Non-profit Organization Serving The Communities Of Mound · Orono · Spring Park · Minnetrista 0 The 1980 Mound C~mprehensive Plan will be updated to reflect changes in the development pattern between 1980 and 1987 and changes in city policy. The plan should be in conformance with the requirements of the Metropolitan Council. Task 1 - Review. Goals and Policies Goals and policies should be reviewed to determine if changes are appropriate. Upon identification of goals and policies in need of modification, new and/or modified statements will be drafted for presentation and review by the city. Task 2 - Inventory and Analysis The Inventory and Analysis section of the existing plan should be updated 'to reflect the most recent population, household and employment projections of the U.S. Census Bureau, Metropolitan Council and other sources. This section should also include an analysis of land use trends and existing and future major issues, Task 3 - Land Use The land use section of the ~omprehensive Plan should be updated to reflect recent development, and, current socioeconomic projections by both the city and the Metropolitan Council. Modifications of the text of the existing plan will be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council. Task 4 - Housing The housing section of the Comprehensive Plan will be edited and modified consistent with CityandMetropolitan Council projections and applicable goals for low and moderate income housing and modest cost housing. Suggested map and Graphics changes will be included. Task 5 - Recreation The existing recreation section will be updated to indicate recent park developments. Suggested modifications will be presented to the Park and Recreation Commission. Task 6 - Transportation The transportation section of the plan will be updated consistent with recent projects and current plans for the city, state and county. Modifications will include recent transportation studies completed by all governmental jurisdictions. Task 7 - Implementation Modification of the implementation section will consist of an assessment of existing ordinances and control measures ag their effectiveness in implementing the 1987 Mound Comprehensive Plan. General recommendations will be provided to address identified deficiencies. The implementation section will also include an update Of the capital ~mprovement program which contains statements of short and long-range improvements and applicable funding mechanisms. Task 8 - Shoreland Management Ordinance A shoreland management ordinance is ho be assembled concurrenh to the preparation of the Comprehensive Plan. The ordinance should be prepared in conformance with the requirements of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. RESOLUTION NO. March 10, 1 987 RESOLUTION RESCINDING COUNCIL ACTION OF FEBRUARY 28, 1987, REGARDING L.M.C.D. APPOINTMENT WHEREAS, the City Council met in Special Session on February 28,~ 1987, to appoint a representative to the L.M.C.D.; and WHEREAS, the City Council took official action to' appoint Thomas Reese to serve as the City's L.M.C.D. representative contingent upon him resigning from the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, Mr. Reese would still like to remain on the' Planning Commission and also serve as the L.M.C.D. representative. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does agree to rescind its action of February 28, 1987, regarding the L.M.C.D. appointment; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby appoints Thomas Reese as its representative to the L.M.C.D. with the understanding that he can continue in his position on the Planning Commission. The L.M.C.D. terms expires September 30, 1988. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: ~ Mayor Attest: City Clerk McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ! LAND SURVEYORS ! PLANNERS March 4, 1987 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Mr. Edward O. Shukle, Or., City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 SUBJECT: 1987 Seal Coat Program MKA #6173 Dear Ed: Enclosed is the Advertisement for Bids for the 1987 Seal Coat Program, so the Council can set the bid date. We are suggesting April 3rd for opening bids, with Council review at their regular meeting on April 14th. The following is a cost estimate for the contracted portion of the project. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL Bituminous Material 40,000 GAL $ 0.85/GAL $ 34,000 Aggregate 2,000 TON 2.30/TON 4,600 Total Estimated Cost .......................................... $ 38,600 In addition to the regularly scheduled streets, we have included quantities for seal coatlng the following areas: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. City Hall parking lot Fire station lot Cemetery road Public Works and Shop parking lots City parking lot adjacent to Post Office C.D.B. parking lot (S.E. corner of Lynwood & Commerce) The anticipated quantities and final cost should be very close to last years. If you have any questions or requlre any additional information, please contact us. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron $C:cah cc: Geno Hoff, Public Works Department, City of Mound Advertisement For Bids Mound, Minnesota 1987 SEAL COAT PROGRAM ~<A #6173 Sealed bids will be received,.publicly opened, and read aloud at the Mound City Hall at lO:O0 AM., Friday, April 3, 1987 for application of approximately 40,000 gallons of bituminous material and 2,000 tons of seal coat aggregate. The bids will'be considered by the City Council at their meeting Tuesday, April 14, 1986 at 7:30 PM. All proposals shall be addressed to: Fran Clark, City Clerk City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN. 55364 And shall be securely sealed, shall be endorsed on the outside with the statement "Proposal for 1987 Seal Coat Program, City of Mound" and shall be on the Proposal Form included in the specifications for the project. Copies of the p~ans, specifications and other proposed contract documents are on file with the City Clerk and at the offices of McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers and Surveyors, 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard, Plymouth, Minnesota 55441. Plans and specifications for use in preparing'bids may be obtained at the office of the Engineer upon deposit of $20.00. The full amount of the deposit will be refunded to each bidder who has made a deposit and has filed a bid with the Owner upon return of the plans and specifications within ten (10) days after the bids are opened. Each bidder shall file with his bid a certified check, or bid bond in an amount not less than five (5) percent of the total amount of the bid. No bid may be withdrawn within sixty (60) days after the bids are opened. The City of Mound reserves the right to reject any or all bids and waive any informalities or irregularities therein. CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA ATTEST: Fran Clark, City Clerk By: Steve Smith, Mayor A. THOMAS WURST, P.A. CURTIS A. PEARSON, P.A. ~JAMES D. LARSON, P.A. THOMAS F. UNDERWOOD, P.A. CRAIG H. HERTZ LAW OFFICES WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA S5~.O2 March 4, 1987 (612) 338-4200 Mr. Ed Shukie, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Ordinance Relating to Controlled Substances Dear Mr. Shukle: I am enclosing an ordinance drafted by this office relating to controlled substances. Could you please review this and if it is in order, it can be presented to the City Council, or if you have any questions or changes, please contact the office. Just as a reminder to Fran, if the ordinance is adopted by the City Council and added to the ordinance code, the Table of Contents should be revised to reflect this addition. Ih Enclosure cc: Ms. Fran Clark Very truly yours, Lucy Hadler Secretary to Curtis A. Pearson ? ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING C~TER IX OF THE CODE OP ORDINANCES BY ADDING SECTIONS 910:00 THROUGH 910:35, INCLUSIVE, RELATING TO CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES The City of Mound Does Ordain: Chapter IX of the Code of Ordinances is amended to add Sections 910:00, 910:05, 910:10, 910:15, 910:20, 910:25, 910:30, and 910:35 reading as follows: Section 910 - Controlled Substances Section 910:00. Controlled Substances. State Statute Incorporated. Controlled Substance Defined. The five schedules of controlled substances listed in Minnesota Statutes 1986. Section 152.02, as amended, are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Section as completely as if set out herein in full. For the purposes of this Section, a controlled substance is any substance listed in the five schedules of controlled substances in Minn. Stat., 1986, Section 152.02. Section 910:05. Prohibited Acts. It shall be unlawful for any person to manufacture, possess, constructively possess, sell, give away, barter, exchange, distribute, or otherwise transfer any controlled substance, except on a lawful prescription by a person licensed by law to prescribe and administer controlled substances. Section 910:10. Possession Defined. Possession shall mean having the controlled substance on one's person or in constructive possession including, but not limited to, constructive possession by that owner of a motor vehicle or by that driver of a motor vehicle if the owner is not present who keeps or allows to be kept in the motor vehicle a controlled substance. Section 910:15. Excepted Lawful Businesses and Professions. Section 910:05 of this ordinance shall not apply to the following in the ordinary course of their trade, their business, or their profession provided, however, this exception shall not be a defense to the doing of the acts prohibited in Section 910:20 hereof: Subd. 1. Practitioners, persons licensed by law to prescribe and administer controlled substances. Subd. 2. Pharmacists duly registered and licensedwith the Minnesota State Board of Pharmacy. Subd. 3. Manufacturers. Subd. 4. Pharmacists as manufacturers. Subd. 5. Wholesalers. Subd. 6. Warehouseperson. Subd. 7. Persons engaged in transporting such controlled substances as agent or employee of a practitioner, pharmacist, manufacturer, warehouseperson, wholesaler, or common carrier. Subd. 8. Public officers or public employees in the performance of official duties requiring possession or control of such controlled substances, or persons aiding such officers or employees in the performance of such duties. Subd, 9. Any patient as herein defined with respect to procuring, possession, and use of a controlled substance in accordance with the terms of a prescription and prescribed treatment. Subd. 10. Persons who procure, possess, or use such controlled substance for the purpose of lawful research, teaching, or testing, and not for sale. Subd. 11. Lawfully licensed and registered hospitals or bona fide institutions wherein sick or injured persons are cared for and treated, or by bona fide hospitals for the treatment of animals. Section 910:20. Unlawful Procuring, Purchase, Delivery or Possession. No person shall procure, purchase, deliver, or possess, or attempt to procure, purchase, deliver, or possess, a controlled substance in any of the following manners: Subd. 1. By fraud, deceit, misrepresentation or subterfuge, or Subd. 2. By the forgery or alteration of a prescription, or Subd. 3. By the concealment of a material fact, or Subd. 4. By the use of a false name' or the giving of a false address, or Subd. 5. By making a false statement in any prescription, order, report, or record relative to a controlled substance, or Subd. 6. By falsely assuming the title of, or falsely representing any person to be a manufacturer, wholesaler, warehouseperson, pharmacist, practitioner, or other person described in Section 910:15 hereof, or Subd. 7. By making, issuing, or uttering any false or forged prescription. Section 910:25. Confiscation and Disposition of Controlled Substances. Any controlled substance found in the possession of any person convicted of a violation of this ordinance shall be confiscated and shall be forfeited to the Chief of Police who shall make proper and timely disposition thereof by destroying it. Section 910:30. Use of Original Containers and Labels Required. All patients having possession of any contr--~lled substance, by lawful prescription of practitioner while such controlled substance is lawfully in such person's possession, shall keep such controlled substance in the original container in which it was delivered until used in accordance with such prescription, and shall not remove the pharmacist's originallabel identifying the prescription from such original container. Section 910:35. Possession o__f Injection Implement. No person except dealers in surgical instruments, apothecaries, physicians, dentists, veterinarians, nurses, attendants and interns of hospitals, sanitoriums or any other institution in which persons are treated for disability or disease, shall at any time have or possess any hypodermic syringe or needle or any instrument adapted for the use of cocaine or narcotic drugs or any controlled substance defined in Minnesota Statutes 152.02. or as defined in Title 21 United States Code 812 by subcutaneous injections and which is possessed for that purpose. unless such possession be authorized by the certificate of a physician issued within a period of one year prior to any time of such possession. Attest~ Mayor City Clerk Adopted by City Council Published in Official Newspaper BILLS .MARCH 10, 1987 Batch 874023 Batch 874024 Computer Run dated 3/4/87 Computer Run dated 3/5/87 41,263.46 79,709.30 Total Bills 120,972.76 I IL. I'1 Z 0 ,.1_1 oo o com ,co Z I I / ~1 ZZZZ~ZZZZZ t 000000 ZZZZZZ 00000(:3 0000000 ZZZZZZZ 0000000 I' I-4 ~J Z 0 .J · r,1P'l ~,v0~ oo u'tu1 l I / / Certificate of Survey for Jean I. Graff in Blocks 1 and 2, ~earrangement 0£ Block 10, Abraham kincoln Addition to Lakeside Park ?~Zk Hennepin County, Minn. .e: 1" = 50' : 2-2-82 Lx/' D. ,I- ¢O~ERC~ BOULEVARD' : .5.520 L~ Z 0 uJ z 0 ~ ooooooooo 0000 0000 i oo I I I I th~J I I nO DD O0 nn =Z X n,, -ir' Z 0 0 I. 0 Z 00000 00000 ZZZ 000 ~o~ ~oo~ ooo · · o, I'1 0,~ ...I -I UJUJ I LU W fl.. Z 0 0 Z o o oo Z mi- l I-- 3" I U. II-- I f"l I p'lmm I I I I I' I LULU I"1 L~ 0 > Y o 0 I Z 0 CITY of MOUND March ;4, 1987 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: RE: CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK FEBRUARY 1987 MONTHLY REPORT February is always a short month. Seems like it just starts and it's over. The City Council held two regular Council Meetings in February. Preparation for those meetings was done. Then the usual minutes, resolutions and items that needed to be handled after the meetings, i.e. contracts, letters, etc. I spent time preparing my 1986 annual report which was presented to the City Council on February 24, 1987. The computer recommendation which was presented to the City Council on February 10, 1987, was put on the word processor. There were 2 afternoon meetings with Hennepin County regarding the new optic scan system. The first meeting was a general meeting of all the municipalities purchasing the new optec scan election equipment. Basic information was given at this meeting regarding who to contact in the county level for what; a copy of the State Certification for the equipment was given out; an Implementation Committee Meeting was set. Business Records Corporation, the manufacturer of the Optec III was present with samples of all three ballot box styles (steel, aluminum or portable), a privacy shield for the ballot box, voting booths aluminum cased, (as we have), blow-molded plastic, and handicapped. There was also a question and answer session. The second meeting was the Hennepin County Elections Coordinating Committee regarding the implementation of the new system and scheduling who would work on the following: 1. A new election judges training manual. 2. City/County coordination. 3. Policies and procedures that will be followed. We will be standardizing our work so that the results can be used anywhere in Minnesota. An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. gal'. Page 2 Monthly Report, February March 4, 1987 The 19 tax forfeit parcels I spoke about in my January report were all researched by me, maps were made, zoning determined and all information sent to the City Engineer, Sewer & Water Superintendent, Street Superintendent, and Park Director for their comments or suggestions. The Assessing Clerk was given the list and will be compiling all the special assessments against these parcels. After I receive all the information, it will be coordinated and will be on a future agenda with recommendations for disposition. Index tabs were needed for each new code book. Linda took on that job and did it very neatly and efficiently. All the pages were inserted into the new binders. We did find a couple of errors (either deleted pages, additional pages that were left out, or pages that were out of order). They ones found have been corrected. As always, a number of residents calling or stopping in with a variety of questions and problems. fc LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road . Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 TO: FROM: Subject: Ed Shukle, City Manager Len Harrell, Chief of Police MONTHLY REPORT FEBRUARY, 1987 I. STATISTICS The police department responded to 590 calls for service in the month of February; up 43 calls from Februaryi986. Calls for Part I offenses were 26; including 2 criminal sexual conduct, 3 burglaries, 16 larcenies, 4 vehicle thefts, and 1 arson. Part II offenses accounted for 79 calls; up 38.6% from the same period last year. Part II offenses included 19 damage to property, 4 abuse/ neglect, 7 forgery/NSF check cases, 4 narcotiCs violations, 13 DWI's, 1 weapons violation, 6 domestics, 4 assaults' and 21 other reported crimes. The patrol division issued 240 adult citations, including 48 parking violations. Juveniles accounted for an additional 18 violations. A total of 196 warnings were issued for various infractions. There were 7 adults arrested for felonies and 5 juveniles. Adults were arrested for 32 misdemeanor crimes and juveniles accounted for an additional 7 misdemeanor violations. The department responded to 11 medical emergencies, 10 property damage accidents, 3 personal injury accidents, and 105 animal complaints. A total of $25,000.00 in assorted property was stolen in February. The department recovered propertyvalued at $5,062.00. II. INVESTIGATION Several cases in February have demanded a good deal of investigative time.. Sgt. Hudson and Officer Grand spent in excess of 40 man-hours investigating a kidnapping situation where a woman from California was held and abused in Mound. The case also included a young child whoneeded additional care. A sexual assault has required an additional 40 to 50 hours and is still not completed. Sgt. Hudson also investigated 12 separate abuse/neglect cases in February. These cases necessitated 41 hours of investigative time. So far, in 1987, the department has investigated 17 abuse/neglect cases; well ahead of the number reported last year. e Sgt. Hudson spent 24 hours at an EMT refresher course during the month. III. MANPOWER Officers used a total of 19 shifts for a variety of time off. Vacation time accounted for 5 days, comp-time accounted for 3 days, holidays accounted ~or 9 days, and officers missed two days because of illness. One officer was shifted for plain-clothes for a period of 9 days in February. IV. OVERTIME Approximately 55 hours of overtime were expended in February. The overtime was necessitated by the week-end investigation of the kidnapping.case, covering two short shifts for officers who were ill, holiday-pay for President's Day, and for court appearances for off-duty officers. Approximately eight hours of overtime accrued from officerswho got involved with late breaking arrest situations. V. TRAINING Officers attended 60 hours of training and the police secretary accounted for an additional 8 hours of training. The areas of training included EMT refresher, narcotics investigation, child abuse, drug prevention, and intoxilyzer recertificationo VI. FO~4J%LCOMPLAINTS Formal complaints were issued for 19 cases involving both felony and misdemeanor charges. Charges ranged from unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and forging a perscription to junk vehicles and dogs at large. ' ~ ' tDIILT. JUV Hor~-~ de Cri~Tnal Sexual Conduct 2 2 3 Robber~ ' Assault Burglary. 3 Larceny 16 2 2 Vehicle Theft i 1 1 2 3 .Arson ' 1 -, TOTAL 26 1 1 . 6 3 5 PART II CRIHES Child Abuse/Neglect 4 1 4 1 i.. Forgery/NSF Checks 7 i I 3. 3 Criminal Damage to Property 19 I I I 2 Weapons 1 1 Narcotic Laws ~ 1 3 4 D~r Laws 13 13 13 ,Simple Assault , 1 1 "1 Domestic Assault 3 't 1 1 Domestics (No Assault) 6 Harassmeflt 8 1 Runaway/Incorrigibility/Truancy 4 2 3 3 Public Peace 3 I I 2 I · 1 All Other Offenses 6 TOTAL 79 5 13 28 23 · 7 PART III:.&':'PART IV Property Damage Accidents 10 Personal Injury Accidents 3 Fatal Accidents 0 Medicals 11 Animal Complaints 105 M 1 Aid Other General Investi~atio. ns 349 TOTAL 485 TOTAL ACTIVITIES 590 6 14 .34 26 12 ~0~ ~'~RRUA'RY ~ I qR? GENERAL ACTIVITT SUMMARY THIS THIS IT2LR LAST 1T~ MONTH TO DATE TO DATE Hazardous Citations 127 237 - 135 Non-Hazardous Citations &6 121 93 ~azardous Warnings 53 Non-Ra_zardous WarninRs 9t 262 ,,-21t , 53 126 - Verbal WarninRs Park~n~ Citations 18 102 163 DWI 13 27 ..16 OVER .10 10 22 11 ,. Property D~ge Accidents 10 20 15 Personal Injury Accidents 3 7 3 Fa~'_a! Accidents 0 0 0 " ' ' 7 21 7 Adult Felony Arrests Adult Misdemeanor Arrests '32 78 75 Adult Misdemeanor Citations' '12 15 10 Juvenile Felony Arrests 5 15 3 Juvenile~sdemeanor Arrests 7 16 14 Juve~!!eMisdemeanor Citations 2 5 0 Part I Offenses 26 60 Part II Offenses 79 138 121 "Medicals 11 24 39 '-Ani_-~_! Complaints 105 190 204 Other General Investi~ations 319 772 717 TOTAL 1,092 2,3t5 1,~82 Assists t2 87 151 Follow-Ups 13' 105 , 38 PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SUHI~RY ITEH Bikes Snowmobiles Boats, Hotors, Tra i 1ers Clothing Currency, Notes, Etc. dewelry & Precious Hetals guns Home Furnishings Radio & Electronic Equipment Vehicles $ Vehlcle Equipment Hlscellaneous TOTAL ' STOLEN $ 1,500 15,687 460 150 1,679 4,509 1,015 $25,000 RECOVERED $ 150 4,500 412 $ 5,062 City · MOUND Month February ~ITATIONS ADULT DWI or OUl 13 More than .10% BAC 10 Careless/Reckless Orlvin9 Oriv|n9 After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle 4 Speedln9 83 No DL or Expired DL 5 Restriction on DL 1 Improper, Expired~ or No Plates *lllegal Passing .Stop Sign Vlolations Failure to Yield 28 Equipment Violations H&R Leavin9 the Scene No Insurance Illegal'or Unsafe Turn ..Over the Centerline 11 12 3 1 Parkin9 ViOlat'ions 48 Crosswalk ~ 6 I)o9 Ordinances 5 Oerelict Autos 1 11 MisCellaneous Tags TOTALS I 240 WARN I NGS No Insurance '31 Traffic 43 Equipment 83 CroSswalk Animals Trash/Derelict Autos 15 Other 3 TOTAL I 179 ARRESTS Felony ~ Mi sdemeanor 19 87 JUV 8 1 2 ~5 18 3 5 9 17 March TO: FROM: RE: CITY of MOUND 1987' ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR FEBRUARY 1987 FINANCE REPORT 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 AUDIT A good portion of my time was spent in preparation for the annual audit. All year-end adjustments must be made to close out the accounts for 1986. The final audit report is scheduled to be presented to the council the second meeting in April. The auditor and myself will be in attendance at that meeting. INVESTMENTS The following is February Investment activity: Balance 2-1-87 $8,137,376 Bought: CP 6.18 Due 5-22-87 Piper 150,470 CP 6.4 Due 3-13-87 Piper 210,000 CD 6.15 Due 6-13-87 St. Bank of Mound 125,000 CD 6.0 Due 5-8-87 Marquette 100,O00 CP 6.2 Due 5-8-87 Dain 199,594 Matured: Govt Trust American National (25,000) T Notes 9.27 Kidder (515,000) T Notes 9.83 First Bank (100,O00) CD 5.90 Marquette (130,000) T Receipts $.10 Marquette (326,830) CD 5.65 Marquette (125,O00) CP 5.83 Marquette (180,000) Balance 2-28-87 $7,520,030 in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. FEBRUARY ~i987 FINANCE REPORT Page 2 COMHERCE SQUARE TIF DISTRICT Balance 2-1-87 $158,389 February interest 772 Balance 2-28-87 $159,161 DOCK LICENSES The deadline for dock licenses applications was the end of February. There was a large volume of dock applications received the last few days in February. The projected income for dock licenses is $38,000. The projected expenses for commons docks is $54,000. JN:ls CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 March 2, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER FEBRUARY 1987 REPORT February was another exceptional month, as far as Februaries go. It is the shortest month of the year, therefore the slowest. The above average weather didn't hurt matters at all. There are no major holidays in February that are of any significance to us. Ground Hog's day, Valentine's day and Presidentts day are not exactly events that will lead to the stampeding of our doors. The same holds true for March this year, since Easter is late. And as far as St. Patrick's day is concerned, well, that is no blockbuster either. To date this year, we have had 12,357 customers as compared to 12,150 to date last year. With this good weather, it is easier for people to get around. Now I am sure March this year will fall far short of March of last year because Easter fell in March of 86. But, then I am hoping it will turn completely around for us in April. I am hiring a new part-time person at the end of the month. Nobody is leaving, it's just that I am one short for the Easter holiday and the upcoming warmer weather. I noticed a week ago that the State is going to raise the minimum wage increments reaching $4.25 by 1989. I hope there is something that can be done about raising the ceiling on P.E.R.A. Right how, it is at $3,900 an employee can earn in a year before the City has to make any contributions. If Municipal Liquor stores are to continue to survive, something will have to be done about this. We had some cash register repair service done to our machines at the end of the month. One of the registers had a problem with a printer that was skipping a line. They both had faded tapes and needed ribbons and rollers. The cost was about $100.OO for parts and labor, which really isn't too bad when you consider we have someone out only twice a year to work on the machines. It is a good preventive measure that is far less expensive than signing a service contract~ JK:ls An equal opportumty Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 March 5, 1987 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Joyce Nelson Recycling Coordinator February's Recycling February's pickup went very smoothly, only 1 person called to say she was missed. After the snow had melted some newspaper and other items were found in the parking lot across from the post office, so these had to picked up also. Last Fall the City of Mound and the City of Minnetrista opened a compost site out at the city garages in Minnetrista. This past week Hennepin County has been out there shedding up the leaves. This compost will not be ready for use though until the Fall of 87 or Spring of 88. It's best if it works for about 18 months. From this point on we should have compost available all the time. We're still having our 20 loads of compost hauled in from Hennepin County this Spring to the stock pile. This Spring we would like to have the compost site open on Saturdays for~6:to 8 weeks.- Mound has someone there on Saturdays and Minnetrista takes care of it during the week. February's pick-up was 15.22 tons. An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status ~ ~'.~ in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 March 4, 1987 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Geno Hoff Street Supt. February's Monthly Report I. mentioned in my January report that we started to work on cutting brush and trimming trees, also the removal of d~ad trees from city property. We have spent about 2% weeks in February on this project, we've spent most of the time in Island Park. We plan to continue this work as long as time and weather permits. STREET SIGN MAINTENANCE The weather has been so mild this month we have had some time to work on' signs. We've straightened about 100 posts and replaced 25. We replaced 15 Stop signs, 6 No Parking, 3 No Dumping and 14 street signs. We posted road restrictions on city streets the 27th. We have received a number of calls from contractors asking for permits to come in with heavy loads, we have turned them down. STREET MATERIALS PURCHASED AND TRANSPORTED We didn't have much time for hauling material this month because we were busy with other work, but we did haul 424 tons of buckshot and 63 ton of sandfill. If time permits we plan to haul some washed sand to the beaches the first part of March. EQUIPMENT The Street Dept. received their new pickup truck the 25th, it's a Chevy 3/4 ton, 4 X 4 Diesel, Candy Apple Red (sharp). It's equiped with a 8' Western plow and 3 Tote boxes. It should be in service the first week of March. CEMETARY We staked out 3 graves and 2 stones. CITY of MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 March 4, 1987 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Greg Skinner Water & Sewer Supt. February's Monthy Activity Report WATER DEPARTMENT In February we pumped 18,344,000 gallons of water. There were 2 new accounts, 4 T-off for non-payment, 2 water main breaks and 14 final readings. This month with the weather being nice we concentrated on the stuck meter and outside reader list. We also did some early spring cleaning. As you are aware the annual reports were presented to the Council this month. Many hours were put into~ these reports. Hopefully next year's preparation will not take as long as this years did. The 2 new 4 X 4 pick-ups ~arrived this month. It has taken 1 week to set up each truck. At this time both trucks will be going back to Bob Ryan Chevy at Buffalo for a few minor repairs. We are still waiting the arrival of the last truck. I have met with John Cameron regarding repair and/or replacement of water mains, gate valves and sewer televising for the County Road 15 project. SEWER DEPARTMENT The Sewer Dept. reported no sewer back-ups for February. With the mild weather we worked on sewer easement and manhole repair. With' the nice weather we've had it would have been nice to start our sewer line maintenance, but with no place to store the tanker and jet we will hold off until the middle or end of April. An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 March 4, 1987 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Greg Bergquist Mechanic SUBJECT: February's Monthly Activity Report This months shop activities included 9 oil changes: 3 for the Police Dept., 3 for the Street Dept., 2 for the Water & Sewer Dept. and 1 for Administration. The Building Inspectors car. (Unit #19) required a new exhaust system. The bulk of shop time this month was spent on the installation of equipment on the new vehicles such as: running boards, radios, warning lites, fire extinguishers. Most of this equipment was taken from existing truck and transferred to the new ones. Steel was purchased to build trailer hitches for each respective vehicle as each department has a specific requirement, which means each one has to be individually built for a specific type of service. Tim Johnson was instrumental in this part of the operation and he did an outstanding job at a cost to the city that could not be compared to if the work was done outside the shop. ~ j~' not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status An equal opportunity Employer that does in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. TO: City Manager and Members of the City Council FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Officlal SUBJECT: February, 1~87 Monthly Report During the month of February, the Inspection Department attended two Planning Commission meetings on February 9th and February 16th, two City Council meetings on February 10th and February 24th. The Presidents' Holiday, we scheduled the Planning and Zoning Commission training meeting to co-incide with the schedule of the City Attorney, Curt Pearson. The following inspections were conducted by myself during the month of February: (Site inspections include the review of the Planning Commission requests and requirements, complaints and follow-ups to code compliance such as, no building permit, recheck of compliance notice, review status of various sites for the City Prosecutor.; pre-construction meetings at the site for building permit applicants or realtors, fire damage and periodic commercial inspection updates.) Site Inspections 34 Footing Inspections Framing Inspections lO Insulation Inspections Drywall Inspections 4 Final Inspections 28 Progress Inspections ll Erosion/Grading Moving Inspections Heating Inspections 4 Plumbing Inspections 7 Fi re Sprinkler O Complaints 6 Total ll7 The heating inspections during the construction of projects are included under the framing and final inspections of buildings. The heating installations men- tioned are for separate equipment being placed in homes and businesses. Several of the inspections for framing involve framing and insulation of the same struc- ture. Monthly reports and the annual report were submitted to the City Manager with annual report presented to the City Council. The Zoning reports were submitted February, 1987 Monthly Report Page 2 to the Planning and Zoning Commission. The staff met with the City Manager regarding office procedures and I also attended the staff meeting. Plan review was conducted on 14 single.family homes and additions as well as the sprinkler system for the State Bank of Mound.. Meetings were held twice with Paul and Pat Meisel regarding the possible remodeling and addition to the old Bank Building .on Commerce Boulevard. Stuart Chazin and Greg Gustafson met to discuss renovation of the old Standard Station. The North Star Chapter meeting was held in Brooklyn Park with the topics covered being moisture problems within homes due to inadequate insulation and ventila- tion, also sound control within buildings. I attended Court proceedings regarding 4610 Kildare Road. Slides were organized for a future City Council presentation on exterior storage. The City vehicle was taken in to the repair garage for muffler replacement. The usual reports were drafted for Planning Commission, proposed resolutions, dictation and correspondence, purchase orders for inspection notices, building codes, etc. and ordering of other sUpplies. Correspondence was mailed out for code compliance on 13 locations. I met.with several contractors during February tO bid City Hall sheetrock repairs. Research of the Grandview apartment history was conducted and corres- pondence was written to the owner for building refinancing. The last day of FebruarY was taken 'off from work as a compensation day for me. The City offices were open for'19 working days. It has'been a very busy month with the mild weather that we have had during this winter season..The total number of building permits issued in February was 23 with .a valuation of $837,737. A copy of the Building Activity Report is attached. The total valuation for the year of 1987 is $1,287,056. In addition, our Department prepared the monthly calendar'of the March Ci.ty meetings and events; arranged to have the Public Works stake out a grave site and check if a particular space in the old section of the' cemetery could be used. JB/ms Attachment CITY OF MOUND Cl~ ~;341 Haywood Road Street A~ldress Hound, HN. BUI~ING A~VI~ REPORT i ....... ,. ~NSTRUCTION (Fam~ "~m'~ 7 TO~I Faml~ U~ 7 ~7~,~], 12 1,072,213. N~ RESIDE~I~ (Group & T~I NEW NON-RESIDE~ { RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS N~ AND ALTERATIONS : ~ ~,~ ~, I :~ 12,000. 1 12,000. ~ ~ I ~<~'" ~ ,UUU. I ~ ,UUU. To,.tn.~a.~t g ~....... 116,61g 17 155,3~8. NON-RE$1DENT~L ~Ob TIONS & ALTERATIONS ~. WI NI ~ VI~IM .. ~., TOTAL MONTH ~D ~;A. mOAT; 20 837,737. ~ 1,287,056. Total DEMOLmON$ ~ Inst. I ] I I PERMITS, iNSPE~ON~ N& ~l ~ ~ ~ ~m ' ' ~EES COLL E~ION$ Fence/Re~ ~al I 1 2900 Highland Boulevard /,,'gO THIS LAST THIS YEAR LAST YEAR MONTH MONTH TO DATE TO DATE H' TON~ 'BEACH ~' FI RE EMERGENCY EMERGENCY EHERGENCY SHOREWOOD - FI RE ' -. EMERGENCY SPRING PARK- : FIRE · ' ' EMERGENCY TOTAL FIRE CALLS " INDUSTRIAL ~S5 & MISCELLANEOUS AUTO -.. TOTAL .' :' i EMERGENCY ' EMERGENCY - SHOREWOOD FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL -MUTUAL AID FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL TOTAL FlEE HOURS MUTUAL AID RECEIVED AUTUAL A~O G~V~N .f DRI?.t~ & I.',~I~TTL"t~CE. . · FI~E & RESCUE DATE' D~ O~ DRI~ ~. T~ H0~Y MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 .- . ......< _/___. D R I L L R E P 0 R T Dnte .')-/L.--r, ,, Time T; isclpl)ne and Tenrn 17ork Pumper Operation Fire Streams & FrlctJon Loss rltlque of Fires ..... -- ....... House Burnlng~ re'Planning ~.Inspect~ons ;ools ~ Apparatus identifying ~atural ~ Prc,~a~e Rns Talk ........ · - Ladder Evolut ~on~ land Extinguisher Operation Salvage Opcratlons ~ear~n9 Protective CloLh~ng films Radio Opcratlons ........ ;irst Aid and ResCue Operation _~1/~_ ltouse Evolutlc.~s ......... J~e of Self-Contalne~ Has~:s Nozzle : Ilose All in-ce ........ inhalator Operation .. NOTE: HouYs Tra}ning Paid X Excused X Uncxcused O_ ........... Pm c~cnt, tiot rald ,-)1/.~__ J Andersen '---~,, ~ -"lZ 7'R ~d e rs 0 n .~/~ J Babb .... J Beauchamp ~.~-- D Bryce ~-~" 'S Bryce ~ D Carlson :~,'.~ S Coll ins [)~ M David ~J(.-~ S Erickson ~- O Garvais '7~'/.~ L 'Hei tz .~/L_C Henderson :z'/:L.. G Johnson ,~../~t_ M K1 eeberger (:~? B Landsman ~)?~-. R Marschke ?.'/,_ .. fus ~)..'/.'~- M .Nel son ~J<'~- A Opi tz ,]l~/J-- B Palm ]O'~j_ G Palm Palm Pederson Platzer Rasmussen Savage Stallman Stallman Swenson Swenson Tobey Williams Williams MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARI'MENT HOUND, MINN[SOTA 55364 isc:pllae and 7cam N~ork r;tlque of Fires ;'c-Piann~ ng &-~nspect~ons ~ois & Apparatus idant~fylng and Extinguisher Operation e,~ring Protective Clothing i rst Al& 8nd ~es~lJe Opar~tJon .~a of Se~f-ContaJned Pumpcr Oi,cra t i(n, Fire Streams r. F~irti(m loss Ibuse Burning~ Salvage Rn(J ~00pcrntlOl,S N~,zzle ~ llo~e A11in,,<e DI/D--J Andersen g?/j-J Garvais ]~/J--M Palm _.~.'~ G AnCerson ~l/j_. t Heitz ~'/~ G Pederson ~'/~ J Babb. ~1/~ C Henderson ~ D Pl atzer ~ J Bea~;champ ~/~G Johnson ~*/~T Rasmussen ~/~ D 3oyd ~Y~M Kleeberger ~'/~M Savage ~/~ D 3ryc~. ~/~ B Landsman g~/~ R Stal lman ~/~ S Sryce ~/~ R Harschke '~l/~ T'Stailman ~ D Carlson ~ J Nafus ~'~ T Swenson S Collins ~ M Nelson ~l~ W Swenson gi/~ A O'pitz ~ M Tobey '.~ Pi David g~/~ B Palm ~/~ R Williams ~/'~ 3 Eric>son g~ G Palm ~'~T Williams bri i liuas~e~ ~- J. Andersen 0 G. Anderson 0 J. Babb ~_ J. Beauchamp ~_. D. Boyd O D. Bryce g ~/~- S. Bryce g~ D. Carlson s. ~) H. David ~ B. Erickson 0 S. Erickson ~) J. Ga~vais I ~. C. Henderson .~ G. Johnson ~ H. Kleeberger 0 B. Landsman 0 R. Harschke ~ J. Nafus HEN ON DUTY TOTAL HONTHLY HOURS ~ H. Nelson ~ A. Opitz ~ B. Palm ~ G. Palm ___~ M. Palm .~ G. Pederson ' D.' Platzer T. Rasmussen T. Stallman T. Swenson ~ W. Swenson 0 M. Tobey g R. Williams ~ T. Williams CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: RE: DATE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER JIM FACKLER, PARKS DIRECTOR FEBRUARY MONTHLY REPORT MARCH 1, 1987 PARKS DEPARTMENT OPERATION Gene ra 1 The Commons Dock program and the rip rapping of the shoreline has occupied the major time this month. Currently, I am finalizing the contract rip rapping project, sched- uling materials for the city crew rip rapp areas, aiding in the supervision of the construction of the vestibule on City Hall, and checking into the dredging of Jennings Bay and overseeing the Commons Dock applications. Also, I have begun to update the Parks Improvement Plan by looking at the 1982 Five Year Plan. I have currently made a rough draft to give to the Parks Commission and will do so at the next meeting. SPECIFIC Tree Removal February saw the removal of four trees, all from street right of ways. These four trees had a combined total of $750.00. This brings the total expense to date to $6100. Commons A lot of progress has been made in rip rapp. I have begun to receive inquiries from residents about other areas. The rip rapping priority schedule is based on areas seeing the worst erosion. When the dock inspector returns for the season, we will have a different schedule for summer rip rapp. Then in early fall, we will have a schedule for winter contract rip rapping. JF: 1 s An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race. color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities. Champlin voters apProve bOnd issue for bigger City Hall, new fire. station A light turnout of voters in Champ- lin Tuesday approved b~ 394 to 260 a $2.95 million bond ~sue to ex- pand City Hall, build a publ!c_ works building and create the city s first satellite fire station. Voters also approved a referendum allowing on-sale liquor licenses for restaurants and hotels by a vote of 517 to 136. Champlin will continue to operate an off-sale municipal liq- uor store. · Fewer than 660 voters, or $ percent of the city's $,000 registered voters, turned out. city Administrator .Scott Martin said the small turnout was probably.due to "the i~sues not being exalting." a cost of $905,000. The public works building will ~ost $1.49 mil- . lion and will occupy 35,000 squat feet. It also will be built in the civic · complex at 12001 _Jefferson .It. wy: The 3,000-square-foot mumc~pm garage will be expand xl to 5,000 square feet and house the four §re The cities of ChampiOn and Anoka jointly o_perate a fire department, but all fire equipment is housed across the Mississippi River in Anoka. Martin said work on the public works building will probably begin in July and'be completed by the end of 1957. Work on City Hall will begin late' this summer and is to be He said the City Hall, which was completed by Christmas. The satel. built in 1973, will be. expanded lite fire-stauon.should be open in from 10.000 to 16,000 square feet at _ spring of Board of Directors President Robert D. Thistle Coon Rapids Vice President Nell W. Peterson Bloomington Past President James A. Scheibel St. Paul Directors Mentor Addicks, Jr. Minneapolis aeeociation of metropolitan municipalities February 24, 1987 SPECIAL AMM MEMBERSHIP MEETING Karen Anderson Minnetonka Gary Bastian Maplewood WHEN: TIME: Thursday, March 12, 1987 7:30 P.M. Larry Bakken Golden Valley bert J. Benke Brighton Mark Bernhardson Orono Walter Fehst Robbinsdale WHERE: St. Louis Park Recreation Center 5005 West 36th. St. (Meeting Room B) St. Louis Park (map on reverse side) PURPOSE: To consider a proposed policy on Fiscal Disparities (Tax Base Sharing) and discuss other Legislative items of concern. Edward Fitzpatrick Fridley Kevin Frazell Mendota Heights Carol Johnson Minneapolis James Lacina Woodbury Gerald Marshall Brooklyn Park Eldon Reinke Shakopee William Saed Inver Grove Heights :nno Salewski Paul UPDATE: As you may recall, the Delegates at the last AMM Legislative Policy Adoption Meeting on November 6, 1986 considered a proposed policy dealing with Fiscal Disparities and sent it back to Committee for more work. After several meetings and many hours of work, the Committee has developed a revised policy proposal for your consideration. The new proposal was approved by the AMM Board on February 19th. at special meeting. PLEASE NOTE: This notice has been mailed to Mayor, Designated Delegates and Managers/Administratures. Copies of the proposed fiscal disparities policy have been mailed to the Chief Administrative Official only for distibution to Mayors and Councilmembers. Leslie C. Turner Edina Executive Director Vern Peterson B This issue effects all member cities and we would encourage each city to have representatives in attendance to cast your vote (or votes) on this important matter. 183 university avenue east, st. paul, mn 55101 (612) 227-5600 ~7 DIRECTIONS TO ST. LOUIS PARK RECREATION CENTER HOIGAARDS 5005 W. 36TH. STREET O _ ~ 36Th. Avenue , I . 5005~. 36th. Street .J ~~~~.,.../~~ ~celsior BlVd' . NORTH associat[.on of metro I tan munic Jitieo TO: AMM Members FROM: Bob Thistle, President Walt Fehst, Chairman - Revenue Committee SUBJECT: Fiscal Disparities Recommendations Background· Based on membership action at the November 6, 1986 meeting to refer Fiscal Disparity (F.D.) Policy back to the Revenue Committee, a small technical committee was formed by President Thistle and Chairman Fehst to form a recommendation for Revenue Committee action· Committee. The committee, chaired by Nell Peterson, Bloomington, included Bob Bocwinski, Columbia Heights; Charles Darth, Brooklyn Park; Barry Johnson, Minnetonka; Gene Van Overbeke, Eagan; and Dick Asleson, Apple Valley. The committee met three times and was monitored by John Anderson, Shakopee; Diane Lynch, St. Paul; Larry Lee, Bloomington; Bill Barnhart Minneapolis, and Jeff Van Wychen, Minneapolis who also provided computer runs. Recommendation. The sub committee made recommendations to the Revenue Committee which met and after some modification has recommended the attached policy that has been changed as follows: a. The Committee reached an implied agreement that the program was intended to narrow the disparity in taxable base rather than rates which imply mill rate which has variable meanings based on location and/or local options· Therefore the word BASE replaces RATE in the bold type policy· b. The Committee unanimously agreed to eliminate G-5 central administration based on the fact that Anoka County indicated a desire to continue administration and there is not evidence that a change is needed. c. Specific recommendation for F.D. factors were to modify the policy on TIF contribution and contribution rate· The contribution rate to be reduced by 2% per year for 5 years to 30%. Existing pre 1979 TIF value to be held harmless until the existing bonds are paid with only new value created through issuance of new debt to be subject to the F.D. contribution. 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-5600 t~'~/ I-G FISCAL DISPARITIES G-1 TAX BASE SHARING PROGRAM The basic premise for the need for a tax base sharing or tax base redistribution system in this Metropolitan Area, is that much commercial and industrial (C/I) development occurs based on location and/or availability of land or particular services. If the seven county Metropolitan Area were one political and economic unit, such as the Houston or Omaha areas, the growth of C/I development in any part would benefit the whole equally and tax base sharing would be unnecessary. However, in this area with 139 cities plus many townships and school districts that is not the case. Thus, there are many cities that because they are fully developed with no room for expansion, or they are located away from the center of activity without appropriate services, or have space but are inconvenient from major transportation facilities cannot attract C/I development. Whereas, others, more favorably located or serviced cannot keep C/I development away. This creates a situation, in general, where the tax base value per area, per household, or per capita is higher, and the taxing ability of the governmental unit greater, allowing a lower tax rate or collection of more dollars to provide service. This, also, creates a situation where two identical C/I facilities could have a large disparity in their property tax rates. THE AMM SUPPORTS A PROGRAM OR PROGRAMS WHICH CONSTRAIN TAX BASE DISPARITIES IN THE METROPOLITAN REGION WITHIN A REASONABLE RANGE WITHOUT STIFLING LOCAL INITIATIVES OR UNIQUE COMMUNITY NEEDS. G-2 OPPOSE DRASTIC CHANGE To compensate for these disparities, the 1971 legislature passed the Fiscal Disparities Act, with a rather complicated formula, whereby 40% of all C/I development and inflation growth from 1971 on is contributed to a Metropolitan Pot and redistributed based on population and fiscal capacity. After 15 years of operation, the magnitude of distribution values both in terms of net value decrease and net value increase is significant for many cities. If fiscal disparities were repealed in total with no replacement or adjustments, property taxes in many cities would increase very significantly just as they would decrease in others. BECAUSE THE MAGNITUDE OF FISCAL DISPARITY DISTRIBUTION IN TERMS OF NET VALUE INCREASE AND DECREASE TO MANY CITIES IS SIGNIFICANT, THE AMM SUGGESTS THAT NO CHANGES BE MADE THAT WOULD CAUSE DRASTIC SINGLE YEAR SHIFTS IN PROPERTY TAXES. G-3 FORMULA MODIFICATIONS The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities has spent two years of committee work studying the fiscal disparities formula and the affects of various modificications to that formula. There are basically two major policy issues that need to be dealt with in a package to accommodate the majority of cities. The first is a fairness or equity question that deals with issues such as the 1971 Base value exemption, equalization of the contribution, minimum distribution, etc. The second policy issue is the rate of contribution. The AMM feels that 40% is too great especially if the base against which it is applied is expended. Each. variable factor has a major impact on a certain subset of cities and thus changes must be done carefully. THE AMM MEMBERSHIP SUPPORTS MODIFICATION OF THE FISCAL DISPARITIES ~FORMULA THROUGH INCLUSION OF SEVERAL FACTORS AS A ~WHOLE. ANY CHANGES OTHER THAN THOSE REFERENCED IN-AMM GENERAL FISCAL DISPARITIES POLICIES OR SPECIFIED HEREIN OR ANY DELETION OR SIGNIFICANT MODIFICATION OF A SPECIFIC FACTOR LISTED -HEREIN WILL RESULT IN THE AMM OPPOSING ANY FISCAL DISPARTIY LEGISLATION UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. FORMULA FACTORS: -PHASE IN ~971 BASE VALUE AT 5% PER YEAR FOR 20 YEARS FOR CONTRIBUTION PURPOSES. THE BASE VALUE FOR SOUTH ST. PAUL SHOULD BE THE CURRENT VALUE. -EXEMPT ALL VACANT LAND FROM CONTRIBUTION. -CONTRIBUTION VALUES SHOULD PREVIOUS YEARS RATIO BY GREATER. BE EQUALIZED TO 85% BY INCREASING THE UP TO 3% OR THE CURRENT RATIO WHICHEVER IS -THE SALES RATIO FACTOR SHOULD BE BASED ON A SAMPLE WHICH IS STATISTICALLY SOUND TO REFLECT ACCURATELY THE REALISTIC LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT. THIS MAY INCLUDE USING A COUNTY WIDE AVERAGE IF AN APPROPRIATE NUMBER OF SALES HAS NOT OCCURRED LOCALLY. USE OF THE MEDIAN RATHER THAN AGGREGATRE RATIO SHOULD BE ADOPTED SINCE THIS MEASURE IS OENERALLY MORE REFLECTIVE OF LOCAL ASSESSING PRACTICES AND IS LESS SUBJECT TO WIDE VARIATIONS OF SALES. -REDUCE THE CONTRIBUTION RATE BY 2% PER YEAR FOR 5 YEARS UNTIL 30% HAS BEEN REACHED. ALL CONTRIBUTIONS THEREAFTER WILL BE AT THE RATE OF 30%. -THE FISCAL CAPACITY FACTOR SHOULD MANUFACTURED HOUSING AND UTILITY VALUE. BE MODIFIED TO INCLUDE -THE POPULATION AND TIMES TWO MULTIPLIER SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE DISTRIBUTION FORMULA AS MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION FACTORS. -THE TWO DIFFERENT POPULATION MARKET VALUE AND DISTRIBUTION WITHIN THE FORMULA. YEARS USED TO CALCULATE THE PER CAPITA SHOULD REMAIN AS THEY ARE CURRENTLY -EXISTING VALUE IN PRE 1979 TIF DISTRICTS SHOULD REMAIN EXEMPT FROM FISCAL DISPARITY CONTRIBUTION UNTIL EXISTING DEBT HAS BEEN RETIRED. NEW VALUE CREATED WITHIN THESE DISTRICTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH NEW DEBT ISSUED SHALL BE SUBJECT TO FISCAL DISPARITIES CONTRIBUTION. G-~ TOTAL DISTRIBUTION There has been some suggestions made to utilize the fiscal disparity formula as a mechanism to create a separate transportation or development fund by only distributing 90% of the tax dollars raised. This would be a hidden property tax. THE AMM STRONGLY OPPOSES USE OF FISCAL DISPARITIES TO METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTAITON, HIGHWAY, OR DEVELOPMENT FUND. CREATE A The Mefropo/ftan Counci/invites ~'ou to attend the State of the Region 1987 The Changing Economy: Taking Stock and Taking Charge March 25, 1987 Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport Hilton 3700 East 80th St., Bloo,v~t,~gton 1:30 p.m. 2-3:45 p.m. 2:00 p.m. 2-2:45 p.m. 2:45-3:30 p.m. 3:30-3:45 p.m. 3:45-4:15 p.m. 4:15-5:45 p.m. 5:45-6:30 p.m. 6:30 p.m. 7-7:15 p.m. 7:15 p.m. 8:00 p.m. Registration OPENING SESSION: THE CHALLENGES OF ECONOMIC Welcome, ~ Stye Keefe "T~g Stock: N~ Econo~c Re~fies," ~ Ro~ L. Ku~ "T~g Stock: Prep~g Tomo~'s Workem," ~ Rep. v~ ~e~on ~d ~swer Pe~od Bre~ ~GION~ RO~~: ~G ~ ~G~--~ TO PAY THE PRICE OF CHANGE~ Moderator: Steve Keefe. Participants: Michael Boehlje, Harold W. Green- wood, Jn, Jesse Overton, Margaret R. Preska, David I~. Roe, Jan I. Smaby Social Hour Dinner "The Importance of a Regional Vision," by Steve Keefe CLOSING SESSION: "Taking Charge: Rediscovering American Leadership," ~ Neal R. Peirce Adjournment Registration Form Advance registration is required and is nonrefundable. Send a check for $35, payable to "State of the Region," and this form by March 18 to: Jane Larson Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Bldg. 7th and Robert Sts. St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Phone 291-6500 I plan to attend the State of the Region on March 25. Name Street Address City/State/Zip Code Phone DOWDEN CABLESYSTEMS 2351 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, Minnesota §5564 472-6394/1-800-642-2915 March 5, 1987 Mr. Ed Shuckle City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mr. Shuckle: This letter is to inform you that we are adding KTMA, Channel 23 to our channel line up as a result of the overwhelming number of requests we have received. Channel 23 will temporarily be placed on Channel 32. Originally Channel 32 was Dow Jones; however, that service no longer exists. It was taken over by AP/TMS, an alpha/numeric news service. Based on a recent subscriber poll less than 3% of those surveyed even knew what the service was and fewer claimed to view it. Keep in mind that we do carry the Financial News Network on Channel 34. Channel 23 will appear on its properly designated channel as soon as the necessary equipment arrives~ We are currently doing a complete market survey of our entire Lake Area subscriber base. It is our intention to seek suggestions, comments and criticisms so that we can respond by making changes to improve our service. If you have any questions, please contact me. Yours very truly, Regional Manager MAS:cj CC: Jim Kutzner - Chair of CATV Advisory Board File Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission 300 Metro Square Building Seventh and Robert Streets Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 612/291-6401 March 3, 1987- TO: Government Officials and Other Concerned Parties SUBJECT: Lake Minnetonka Regional Park On Monday, March 9, 1987, the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission will be briefed by Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District staff about the Feasibility Report and Acquisition Master Plan for Lake Minnetonka Reqional Park. Council park planning staff expects that a staff comment and recom- mendation for action will be presented to the commission at its following regular meeting on March 23, 1987. The March 9 briefing is tentatively scheduled for 4:30 p.m. in the Metropolitan Council Chambers at 300 Metro Square Bldg. in St. Paul. The briefing will be followed by Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission discussion and an opportunity for other interested persons to comment to the commission. Copies of the plan will be available at the meeting. For further information, call Jack Mauritz of the Council's park planning staff at 291-6602. Sincerely, Chairman LK:sa Established by the Minnesota Legislature as an agency of the Metror~olitan Council C 2O ;TE PLAN of 2~, 25 & 26, SUBDIVISION LOTS 1 AND 32, I I-- 1