1987-04-14 CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, APRIL lq, 1987
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. Pledge of Allegiance
Approve the Minutes of the March 2q, 1987 Regular
Meeting·
Pg. 896-905
PUBLIC HEARING: CASE NO. 87-620: Lot Size Variance,
Setback and Conditional Use Permit for
Grocery Store (Grimm's Store) at 3069
Brighton Boulevard, for Devlin Gleason.
Pg. 906-91q
Reset Public Hearing to Consider Amending the Zoning
Map to Change the Zoning of a Portion of the
Property along Northern Road from B-2, General
Business to R-2, Single Family Residential
(SUGGESTED DATE: May 1%, 1987}
Resolution Proclaiming the Annual Sale of Buddy Poppies
By the VFW
Pg. 915
Pg. 916
Resolution Amending Resolution ~87-59, V.F.W. Post
~5113, Commerce Blvd.
Pg. 917-921
7. Street Light Request - Oaklawn Lane
Pg. 922-929
8. Street Light Request - Three Points Blvd. & Dove Lane Pg. 930-933
Comments & Suggestions fr'om Citizens Present
10.
Approval of Labor Agreement Between the City of Mound
and Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement
Employees Union, Local #320 - PUBLIC WORKS
11. Bid Award - 1987 Seal Coat Program
Pg. 93~-935
Pg. 936-937
12.
Request to Use Launching Facilities at Mound Bay Park
for Minnesota Open Bass Classics Tournaments,
June 7, July 18 & July 19, 1987
Pg. 938
13. DISCUSSION ITEM: Exterior Storage Ordinance
Pg. 939-96q
14.
Hennepin County Road 15 Project:
A. Preliminary Cost Estimate from Hennepin County
B. Possible projects to be done in conjunction with
County Rd. 15 Project
Pg. 965-969
Page 894
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
Approval of Garden Leases
Resolution Authorizing the Mayor & City Manager to
Execute a Quit Claim Deed to Sell City Property -
Part of Southwest 1/2 of Lot 16, Block 14, Arden
Pg. 970-972
Pg. 973-976
Resolution to Authorize Mayor & City Manager to
Execute Quit Claim Deed Selling City Property
Lots in Block 11 and Part of Lots in Block 10,
Whipple
Pg. 977-980
Resolution Reconveying (if necessary) Certain Tax
Forfeit Lands Back to the State and Requesting the
County Board to Impose Conditions on the Sale of
Said Tax Forfeit Lands and to Restrict the Sale to
Owners of Adjoining Lands
Lot 2, Block 13, Avalon
Pg. 981-984
City Attorney and Prosecuting Attorney Annual Reports
Gambling License - VFW #5113
Pg. 985-994
Pg. 995
DISCUSSION ITEM: No Smoking Policy
DISCUSSION ITEM: Defense and Indemnity of City Council
Members, Employees and Appointed Officials Pg. 996-998
Funding Request from Westonka Intervention Project Pg. 999-1010
Payment of Bills Pg. 1011-1026
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS:
Ae
Be
March 1987, Monthly Reports as Prepared by the
Department Heads ·
Minnetrista's response to City Manager's letter of
March 31, 1987, regarding Proposed Lake Minnetonka
Regional Park
Pg. 1027-1066
Pg. 1067
Ce
Action Alert from the League of Minnesota Cities
Regarding an Election Bill in the Legislature,
Senate File ~1B41, which everyone should oppose.
Pg. 1068-1069
De
E®
F®
Another thank you letter to Ms. Grace Brunner and
Ms. Eugenia Petersen for their $50.00 donation
for the purchase of bullet-proof vests for the
Police Dept.
An invitation to the next Mound City Days Meeting
to be held, Wednesday, April 22, 1987, at 7:30 P.M.
Mound City Hall
L.M.C.D. 1986 Financial Statement
Pg. 1070
Pg. 1071
Pg. 1072-1075
Page 895
~0
March 2~, 1987
MINUTES - MOUND CIT~ COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
I~RCH 24, 1987
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, March 2~, 1987, at 7:30 P.M. in the
Council Chambers at 53~1Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Don Abel,
Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were:
City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, City.
Attorney Curt Pearson, Finance Director John Norman, Building
Official Jan Bertrand, City Engineer John Cameron, City Planner
Mark Koegler, Police Chief Len Harrell, Liquor Store Manager Joel
Krumm, Fire Chief Don Bryce, and the following interested
citizens: David Morse, Jim Nordby, Mike Tobey, Ron DeVinney~
Mary Rafferty, Jim Rafferty, Harry Putt, Keith Putt, Jan and
Michael Kraemer, Bob Malers, Vickie Gupstrom, Gerald Babb, W.M.
Barkley, Ed Freidlund, Dorothy Caster, Ralph Todd, James Roseen,
Steve Coddon, Kefin & Jayne Hetchler, Lewis Caster, Frank Niesen.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in
attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance_was recited.
MOTION made by Abel, seconded bY Jensen to approve the
Minutes of the March 10, 1987, Regular Meeting, as submitted.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion'carried.
PUBLIC HEARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY.
The City Manager reported that the revised amount is $1,807.85.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. There was no response. The
Mayor closed the public hearing. '
Johnson moved and Abel seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION ~87-54 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT
UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,807.85
AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT-OFF
WATER SERVICE FOR THOSE ACCOUNTS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
March 24, 1987
CONTINUATION OF CASE #87-606. 607 & 608: ISSUANCE OF A
~0NDITIONAL USE PERMIT ESTABLISHING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT'
AREA AND APPROVAL OF A pLAT & VARIANCE FOR LAND LOCATED AT
,]838 COMMERCE BLVD., PID #13-117-24 33 0006 (SHERWOOD-DRIVE
'AR~A)' FOR DAVID MORSE
The City Planner reported that a new plan has been submitted
identifying two new single family residential lots that receive
access' from a 16 foot wide driveway easement. The new lots are
22,000 square feet and 27,000 square feet in size. This new
arrangement will allow the installation of a future cul-de-sac..
off of Commerce Blvd.
The Staff recommends approval of' the preliminary plat, the
conditional use permit to establish a Planned Development Area
(PDA) and issuance of a variance allowing the new lots to front
on a private easement rather than a public street, with
conditions outlined in the proposed resolution.
The City Engineer reported that a revised grading and.drainage
plan has been submitted. He also reported on the extension.of
the utilities to the new lots.
Abel moved'and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION ~87-55 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA), ,APPROVAL OF
VARIANCES AND APPROVAL OF A PRELIHXNARY
PLAT FOR THE MORSE ADDITION, PID #13-117-
24 23 0006, P & Z CASE t87-606, 607 & 608
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE #87-609: FINAL APPROVAL OF REGISTERED LAND SURVEY FOR
SUBDIVISION OF I.AND LOCATED AT 4841BARTLE~¥ BLVD-
PID #13-117 2~ 44 0003, FOR STEv£ CODDON
The City Engineer reviewed the request of the applicant. The
applicant, Steve Coddon, asked that the City transfer $500 of the
$1000 held in escrow for Case ~86-610 to this Case number. The
City Attorney suggested adding ~11 to the proposed resolution
which would state: ,Posting:of a subdividers escrow in the
amount of $500.00 for engineering, administrat, ion and legal
costs". The Council agreed.
Jensen moved and Abel-seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 87-56 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE FINAL REGISTERED
LAND SURVEY, PID #13-117-24 ~4 000~, PART
OF GOVERNMENT LOT 8, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP
117, RANGE 24 WEST, P & Z CASE ~87-609
42
March 24, lg87
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion uarried.
CASENO, 87-618=
LOT SIZE & SETBACK VARIANCE. FOR LOT 14, BLOCk
14, DEVON; PID #25-117-24 11 0043, KEVIN ·
JAYNE HETCHLER, 4913 ISLAND VIEW DRIVF -
The Building Official explained that the applicants are now
asking for an enclosed deck and the deck size in the proposed
resolution should be 12 feet by 22 feet. The Planning Commission
recommended approval.
The City Manager stated that a letter from Mr. Lewis Caster, 4917
Island View Drive has been received and he has attached his
engineers report and recommendations on drainage. The Council
discussed the grade and drainage and asked that if this item were
approved, the engineering report provided by the Casters be
included in the resolution. The City Engineer agreed with the
Caster's engineering report.
Councilmember Jessen expressed concern about intensifying a non-
conforming use on this small lot.
Abel moved and Smith seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION ~87-57
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AND GRANT A VARIANCE TO PLACE
AN ATTACHED GARAGE 18 FEET TO 20.3 FEET
FROM ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, RECOGNIZE AN
EXISTING UNDERSIZED LOT, AND SIDEYARD, LOT
14, BLOCK 14, DEVON, PID ~25-117-24 11
0043, P & Z CASE ~87-618 (4913 ISLAND VIEW
DRIVE)
A roll call vote was q in favor with Councilmember Jessen voting
nay. Motion carried.
CASE NO. 87-619: 'LOT SIZE VARTANCE FOR LOT 7, EXCEPT THE NORTH
FEET & LOT 8, BLOCK 9,. DREAMWOOD? PID ~13-117-24
21 0029, FOR ROB MAIERS, 1729 BLUEBIRD LANE
The Building Official explained the applicant,s request.
was~discusslon on the drainage problem in the area.
Jensen moved and Abel seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #87-58
There
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR NITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO RECOGNIZE AN
EXISTING UNDERSIZED LOT FOR LOT 7, EXCEPT
THE NORTH 14 FEET, AND LOT 8, BLOCK 9,
DREAMWOOD, PID ~13-17-24 21 0029; P & Z
CASE ~87-619 (1729 BLUEBIRD LANE)
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Motion carried.
~3
March 2~, 1987
CASE NO. 87-620:
.pERMIT FOR GROCERY STORE (GRIMM'S STORE)
~RIGHTON BLVD., FOR DEVLIN GLEASON
LOT SIZE VARIANCE, SETBACK AND CONDITTM USE
AT 306~
The Building Official explained the request. The
Commissio~ tie voted and did not recommend approval.
Planning
Th& applicant explained that he feels there is a need for this
neighborhood grocery store and that is has historic value because
it has been there since 19~2.
Mr. Mike Tobey, who lives next to the store spoke in favor of
having the store. His only problem was people parking in front
of his driveway.
The Council briefly discussed this item and decided to take
gction on the variances and the Conditional Use Permit
application when the item comes before the Council at a Public
Hearing on April 1~, 1987.
MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Johnson to table this item
until the public hearing on April lq, 1987. The vote was
unanimously in favor.. Motion carried.
CASE NO. 86-558: APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN & VARiaNCE FOR MOUND
254q COMMERCE BL¥~., LOTS 26-30, 32 ANDPART OF
33. AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION #176
The City Engineer stated that there are-items that were in the
previous site plan which are not in the new site plan. The items
are as follows:
1. An easement acceptable to the city engineer along the
drainage ditch.
2. A 6 foot green strip along the west side of the property.
3. Concrete curb & gutter around a bituminous parking lot.
Mr. Frank Niesen, representing the VFW, stated they would rather
not finish the parking lot with concrete curb and gutter and a
bituminous surface at this time because of cost. He did agree to
eliminate parking space #~8 on the current plan for green space
next to the sidewalk on Commerce Blvd.
The Council discussed the parking lot, the number of spaces and
the occupancy of the building. They agreed they wanted the
concrete curb & gutter and bituminous surface on the parking lot.
Abel moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION ~87-59 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING VARIANCES FOR MOUND
V.F.M. POST 5113, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION
~167, COMMERCE BLVD., P & Z CASE ~85-558
MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jessen to amend the proposed'
resolution to include:
March
*#11.
A § foot green strip be left between the property
line on the west side off the parking lot and the
parking spaees.e
The vote was unanimously in favor of the amendment.
carried.
Motion
The vote was unanimously.in favor of the original resolution as
amended. Motion carried.
CONVEYANCE OF CITY OF MOUND PROPERTY TO JRW PROPERTIES (LYN~OO~
BLVD. AREA)
The City Engineer handed out a map of the ~ parcels to be
conveyed and explained that the City has fee title to the South
1/2 of Parcel 1 and all of Parcel 4. The City does not have fee
title to the North 1/2 of Parcel 1, Parcel 2 and Parcel 3. JRW
Properties would like to City to convey all 4 Parcels to them,
because it is part of their parking lot. The City ~ngineer
recommended conveyance subject to approval of the deed by the
City Attorney.
It was suggested that the City convey this property for $1.00.
The Council discussed the price.
Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:-
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
MANAGER TO SIGN QUIT CLAIM DEEDS
CONVEYING 4 PARCELS OF CITY LAND TO JRW'
PROPERTIES
The vote was ~ in favor with Mayor Smith voting nay.
carried.
Motion
C~OMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
Russ Peterson asked for some clarification on the decision on
item ~4,. the Morse property. The Council took a break so that
Mr..Peterson could consult with the City Engineer.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ~;'
THE FORM OF A DECLARATION OF TRUST ESTABLISHING AN ENTITY
AS "MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL MONE~ MARKET FUND* AND AUTHORIZIN~
PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN INVESTMENT PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION
The Finance Director explained that basically this is authorizing
another official depository, but a special resolution is needed.
The City Attorney corrected Section 1, "City Clerk" should read
City Manager.
March 2~, 1987
Abel moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #87-61 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO A JOINT
POWERS AGREENENT IN THE FORN OF A
DECLARATION OF TRUST ESTABLISHING AN
ENTITY KNOWN AS UNINNESOTA MUNICIPAL MONEY
MARKET FUNDu AND AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION
IN CERTAIN INVESTMENT PROGRANS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carriedL
F~ASIBILITf REPORT - PROPOSED WATERNAIN EXTENSION, VACATED LAUREL
The City Engineer ~ent over the background of this watermain
extension.
Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #87-62 RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT
AND SETTING APRIL 28, 1987, FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE INPROVENENT
The vote was u~animously in favor. Motion carried.
HAi~TENANCE PERMIT. REOUEST FOR SECURITY LIGHT AND STAIRS TO
C '-
The City Manager reported that the Park Commission has
recommended approval with conditions.
NOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to approve a
Naintenanee Permit for a security light and stairs to Commons
dock area for Jim Roseen, 1555 Bluebird Lane. under the
conditions that the light have a looked outlet box and the
stairs plan be approved by the Building Dept. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Notion carried.
Ron DeVinney was present asking that the City check and make sure
that the docks and charter boats from A1 & Alma's are not
infringing on Chester Park and Beach. The Council stated Staff
would check.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jessen to authorize the
issuance of Commercial Dock Licenses to A1 & Alma's (5200
Piper Road) and Charles R. Jones (dba. Ninnetonka Boat
Rental, 4850 Edgewater Drive). The vote was unanimously in
favor. Notion carried.
~6
DEPARTMENT H~A~ ANNUAL REPORTS
March 2~1, 1987
The following Department Heards presented their annual reports to
the City Council: Liquor Store Manager Joel Krumm, Finance
Director John Norman, Police Chief Len Harrell.
FIRE DEPARTMENT TRANSFERS OF FUNDS
The Finance Director explained the two proposed resolutions.
Abel moved and Jensen seconded the' following resolUtion:
RESOLUTION ~87-63
RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER $9,350 FROH THE
FIRE EQUIPMENT DEBT SERVICE. 1981 FUND TO
THE AREA FIRE SERVICE FUND TO CLOSE OUT
THAT FUND
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION ~87-64 RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER $2,827 FROM THE
CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND TO THE AREA FIRE
SERVICE FUND TO CLOSE OUT THAT FUND
The vote was unanimously in favor. 'Motion carried.
REQUEST TO USE LAUNCHING FACILITIESAT MOUND BAY PARK FOR
MINNETONKA BASS CLUB FISHING TOURNAMENT
The City Manager explained. The Council asked that the City
Manager send the Club a letter asking that they limit the noise
of the engines in the early morning hours when launching.
MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jessen to permit the
Minnetonka Bass Club to use the launching facilities at Mound
Bay Park for their annual Bass Fishing Tournament on June 6,
1987. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
SET PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Abel to set April 14,
1987, at 7:30 P.M. for a public hearing to consider amending
the zoning map to change the zoning of a portion of the
property along Northern Road from B-2, General Business to R-
2, Single Family Residential. The vote was unanimously in
favor. Motion carried.
LICENSE. RENEWAL: TREE REMOVAL & HAWKER - FOOD VENDO~
MOTION made by Johnson. seconded by Abel to authorize the
issuance of the following licenses:
~7
March 2~, 1987
TR££ R£MOVAL
Bear Tree Care
Robert F. Dahlke
Lutz Tree Service,'Inc.
Todd Scheiding, DBA Certified Tree Management
Emery's Tree Service
Shorewood Tree Service
Sutherland's Nursery & Tree Service
aA~KER - FOOD VENDOR
Blue Bell Ice-Cream
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Motion carried.
pAYMENT OF BILLS
HOTION made by Jessen, secOnded by Johnson to approve the
payment of bills as presented on the pre-list, in the amount
of $133,302.96, when funds are available. A roll call vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
The City Manager stated that Mr. & Mrs. Bernard Lister, 2721
Tyrone Lane, have donated $25.00 toward the purchase of bullet-
proof vests for the Police Department. A. thank you letter has
been sent.
INFORHATION/MISCELLANEOUS:
A.
February 1987 Financial Report as Prepared by John
Norman, Finance Director.
B. Planning Commission Minutes of March 9, 1987.
C. Memo dated March 16, 1987 from Jim Miller, President,
League of Minnesota Cities on "State of the Cities,
1987" and a copy of the report.
D. Copy of the February 1987 issue of ~ Mana~emenZ
magazine published by the' International City Management
Association, (ICMA). Main Topic is the ,Council-Manager
Plan", the form of government the City of Mound has.
£. REMINDER: State of the Region Meeting sponsored by
Metro Council, March 25, 1987, Minneapolis - St. Paul
Hilton, 1:30 - 8:30 P.M. Let me know if you want to
attend and I will pre-register you.
F. REMINDER: Public Input Meeting on Lost Lake at the
Planning Commission Meeting, Monday, March 23, 1987,
7:30 PM, City Hall.
March 2~, lg87
Patrolman Kyle Larson has resigned his position with the
Mound Police Department effective March 31, 1987. He
has accepted a police officer position in Maple Grove.
Kyle has served the City well the past 2 years and we
extend our appreciation for his efforts and congratulate
him on his new appointment.
The Cable TV Advisory Committee will be undertaking a
community survey of subscribers who presently have Cable
TV service. The purpose of the survey is to collect
data on such items as responsiveness of Dowden.
Cablesystems to Cable TV needs, reception problems,
billing process, programming, etc. The City Council
approved the survey concept last fall. The committee
has developed this survey over the past few months to
send out on or about April 1, with return to be by May
1. We will share the data with you once it has been
tabulated.
Park Commission minutes of March 12, 1987, meeting.
J. School Board Minutes of March 9,. 1987.
K. REMINDER: CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION. Saturday,-March
28, 1987 at 8:30 AM, City Hall.
MOTION made by Abel, seconded by jensen to adjourn at 11:00
P.H. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
The Council then met in Executive Session to discuss labor
negotiations at 11:05 P.M. They adjourned at 11:35 P.M.
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk
BILLS ......... MARCH 2q, 1987
Batch 87qO31
Batch .87q032
Computer Run dated 3/14/87
Computer Run dated 3/19/87
96,761.q5
35,331.64
Anoka VTI
Economy Dictation
SuperAmer|ca
Fi re School Registrations
Exami ne Dictaphone
Feb gasoline
280.00
15.00
914.87
TOTAL BILLS
133,302.96
C]TY OF' HOUND
Hound, HjnnesOta
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN~ TO CONSID£R ALLO~INO
STRUCTURAL HODIFICATJONS', APPROVAL.OF VARIANCES'
AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT FOR. GROCERY STORE
.KNOWN'AS .GRI/~I'S'.STORE, 3069 BRIGHTON BOULEVARD,'
'.1~ THE B-3'NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRIC¥.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GiVEN.that on Tuesday'., April lq, 1987, at 7:30 P.H.
at the C. ity' Hall, 53/~1 Haywood Road,'.Hound, Hi. nnesota~ a :hea~ing wi 11 be
held to consider a'llowing'.structural:modifications to .the building presently
known as 'Gri.mmts Store~., .306~) Brighton Boulevard; and to consider approving
variances and a cond|tfonal'.use.permi.t .for a grocery store In the B-3 Neigh-
borhood Zoning District.,. Property legally described as: Lot 18, Block 15,
Arden; PIG Number 2q-117-2/~ /43 0017.
All persons appearing at' said., heari..ng will 'be g'iv=en .the 'opportunity to
be heard.
Francene C. Clark, City Clerk
3030 Harbor Lane North,
Suite 104
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441
612/553-1950
TO: Planning Commlssic~ and Staff
FR(~: Mark Eoegler, City Planner
D~= March 9, 1987
Variance (Grims Store)
CASE ~t3: 87-620
VHS FILE NO= 87-310-A14-ZO
EXIgi~ ZONING: Neighborhood Business (B-3)
PLAN= Residential
BACKGROUND= The applicant has applie~ for a variance to recognize the existing
setbacks and lot area for the grocery store at 3069 BriGhton Boulevard (Grims
Store). The existing store consists of approximately 1300 square feet. and has a
one foot setback on the north, a six foot setback on the east, a 17 foot setback
on the south and a 9 foot 10 inch setback on the west. The lot area totals 3000
square feet.
In the B-3 zone, uses are required to have 10,000 square, feet of lot area.
Required setbacks for the existing store are 50 feet on the north, 30 feet o~
the east, 30 feet on the south and 50 feet on the west. The subject property
will require a 7000 square foot lot area variance, a 49 foot variance along the
northern property line, a 24 foot variance along Brighton, a 13 foot variance
along Tuxedo and a 40 foot 2 inch variance along the western property line.
Additionally, the applicant shows a total of 7 parking stalls and the ordinance
requires 9 stalls resultin~ in a 2 stall variance.
?07
COMMENTS: The Zoning Ordinance allows variances providing that the use is not
intensified. The proposed improvements to the grocery store are structural and
cosmetic in nature a~d will not increase the size of the. building. In addition
to the proposed variances, a new conditional use permit should be issued for the
store. The existing store is a grandfathered use a~d as a result, no written
permit currently exists.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit and
recognition of the existing variances for the grocery Store at 3069 Brighton
Boulevard subject to the following:
®The existing parking area shall be reviewed by the City t~gineer
to ensure adequate ingress/egress.
~ I:~ I0 HT 0 N
o
CaseNO.
CITY OF HOUND
APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COHHISSION
(Please type the following information)
Street. Address of Property~~~~:~~
Legal DesCription of Property:
Addition ' A ~Ae ~
Fee Pal d
O~te FI led
Applicant (If other than owner):
Day Phone No.
Name
Address
5. Type of Request:
(~) Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit
( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review
(.) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D.
( ). Amendment
( ) Sign Permit
( )*Other
*If .other, specify: '
~, Present Zoning'District' ~ '"
7. Existing Use(s) of Property . . '
8. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or condltional use permit or
.other zoning procedure for this propertyT ~1(~ If so, llst date(s) of
list date(s) of application, action taken and' provide Resol-ution No.(s) .
accompany present request·
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required
papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry In
or upon the premises described in thls applicatlon by any authorized offlclal of the City
removing such
of Hound for the purpose o_~f Inspecting, or of. posting, maintaining and
_o.
Plannlng Commission Recommendation:
Date
Council Action:
Resolution No.
Request for Zoni.ng Variance Procedure (2)
O,. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilitles, et~.
E. Indicate North compass direction
F. Any additional Information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff
and applicable Sections of the 2onlng Ordinance.
III. Bequest for a Zonin~ Variance .A?
All.information belc~v, a site plan, as described In Part II, and general
appllcatlon must be provided before a hearing w111 be scheduled.
Does the present use of the property'conform to all use r~gulatlons for
the zone district In whlch It Is located? Yes ( ) No
.... , specify each non-conforming use:
B®
Do the existing structures comply with'all area hei~h~ and bulk regulations
for the zone district in which It Is.located? Yes (~,)~ No ( )
If Unote, specify each non-conforming use:
O. Which unique physlcal characteristics of the subject property prevent Its
reasonable use for any of the uSes.permitted In that zoning distrlct?
) .Too narrc~v (.) Topography' ( ) Soil
Too. small ( ) Drainage ( ) Sub-surface
( ) Too shallow. ( ) Shape ( ) Other: Specify:
,
E. Was the hardship d~scribed above created by the action of anyone having
property.interests In the land after the ZOning Ordinance was adopted?
Yes ( ) No (~ If yes, explain:
F. Was the hardship created by any'other man-made change, such as the reloca-
tlon of a road? Yes ( ) No ~ If yes, explain:
Ge
Are the conditions of hardship for'which you request a variance pecullar
only to the property described in this petition? Yes (~ No ( )
If no, how many other properties are similarly affected?
H..What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations
that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using
maps, slte plans with dimensions and written explanatlon. Attach addltlonal
sheets, If necessary.)
I. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the
same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance/
* and.the'roof trusses'to-brlng,.the'bulldi.ng up-to-code, and for safety reasons.
~0
This block i~ oil marsh
7 e>15
3. Case No. 87-~2~ Variances.for. Lot STze'and'Setbacks'¢or 3069 Br. lghtbn. Blvd,
Lot 18, Block 15, Arden;.P~O 2%')~7-2~ 4~ 0017' :
Devlin ~leason was. present,'
The Clty Pla~ner, ~ark. K oegler, revlewed ~Is'rep&rt,'glv~ng.the;&xlsting ~lzes
and setbacks, the requirements'and.the.amoun~t, of varlances'needed'.wh~ch ere:
7,000 square foot .lot area~.a ~9 foot:variance along.the'northern property
(existing setback Is 1 foot and .50 foot.ls.req61red because Structure abuts
residential), a 2~.foot va'rlance along. B~i~ht6~ a .]3 foot variance along
Tuxedo and.a ~0 foot 2 lnch varlancea)ong the Western property."llne .(also
abutting reslden~ial) and add)t)onally"2'.stall parki6g..vari.a~ce.~'He commented
this request doesn't IncFease'the bU)k.of.the building.'..
The applIcant, Deviln GIea~on, commented"he Is buylng'the bus.lness and he will
operate it, ~ainly, he ls putting in new floor, ~ew beam going through the .
center, new joists, beefing'up the ~oof., put'lng In new'electrical with a 200 amp
'.service, ,hooking up to'Clt~ sewer,and.lnst~lllng p.lumblng. The Co~Isslon
asked about the 50 percent..on this request'(cost of what. woul.d.be, done).
G).eason figures the value to be.about'$~0,000 and will be puttlng In about
$20,000.+. (Preseht tax value ls lis'ted as $22,200.) It was noted that the
. foundmtl~n Is good; hal,clay tile walls'. The beam~ and support posts are being
changed. The structure was built In 190q endprobably wou~d quallfy is,an
hlstorlcal bulidi~g '(Outside would have to be left un'changed).'
The neighbor, Hrs. Tobey', has real concerns; their property wraps around and
she commented that.she tried to purchase store.ln order'to'i~.evel; but i.t.was
too exp~nslve. If building is'to be t'here, she"d like to'~ee.it upgraded.
The Commission dlscus's'ed that It. ls very much nonconforming structure. The
permit ~as Issued for non-struct'ural Improvements llke rooflng, fir out
existing walls~ insulate and putting i.n bathroom partitions;' be reopened as. a
grocery store. It was .noted that there is not a conditional use permit
on thls property, but there should be. The Commlssion discussed at length;
they asked..~b6ut' proposed'hours of operation and what'alternatlves, there
might be for thls property?' Gleas0n Stated he pJanned on bein~ open about'
? a.m. for commuters to perhaps 7 p.m.;"ln the summer, perhaps until ~ p.m.
· Kc?.egler state~ you have to allow some reasonable use of 'the property or h~ve
the City acquire It.
:'.:--L .C '
Meyer moved and Smith Seconded a mo~IOn .to recommend, approving.the staff
recon~endatlon to a~lo~ fixing.up the buitdlng and recognize.'the existing
non-conformancles and/bring the building up to Building Code.
The'parking in front of the store was discusseS: and felt to.be .hazardous' '
· to chlldren exiting.the store.· It was'suggested.that ""no parklng" be allowed
from Tobey"s mail box t~ corner and It' be signed. -
Chairman Reese stated he Intended t6 vote 'againSt thls motion and he~d .like
bls reasons .noted in the minutes, They are as follows:.:
On Page.2 of City Att0rneyis.lettec to City Ma~age~.Leonard. K~pp..~ated..-
Sept. 18, 1969,.which says, ~!The.general rule of law is. that where a ·
.property .owner purchases property after adoptlo~, of a zoning ordinance '
which restricts the property"s.use, he has no standing to complaln that
the res:rlction on the use unlawfully diminishes the value of this property."
~age 1 of City Attorney"s letter da~ed Aprll 15, 197& which says if, "
~hen l.t.w~s conveyed to hlm,'applican~ and hls predecessor in tltle knew
that bls :lot' di'd not 6eet these .requlreme~_~"~ .... !"The' property owners of
· subs.read, rd lots,d0~not have an'automatl~rlght to the Issuance of permits~'
partlcul.a.rly when ownership at the tlme of the adoption of the ordinance
was'In common wlth ownership'of abutting properties,'making it physical.ly
feaslble to combine such separate Idts'of record for purposes of the
Issuan.ce;of permits to bulld only one single.family dwelling..~
The vote on the.motion was: Reese, Mlchael, 5ohns and ~eIland against;
· Anderse6, Meyer, Smith and'The1 in favor; vote is tled, ~ to ~. Motion failed.
This will go to the City Council on March 24, 1987.
After further'discussion by the Commission:
.... Smith moved and Weiland seconded a motion that if the Council approves
~ the variance request, the Planning Commlsslon would waive having this
item come back to the Plannlng Commission for a Conditlonal Use public
hearing. The vote was unanlmously.ln favor.
CITY OF ~DUND
Mound, Minnesota
R-R~ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
NOTIC2: IS FIERE~Y GIVEN that cx~ Tuesday, Hay lq, 1987, at 7:30 p.m. at the
City ~lall, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, a hearing will be held to
consider the rezoning of parcels 76, 26, 27, 28, 30 and 29 from B-2, General
Business to R-2, Single Family Residential (see map below). The rezoning is
being considered to bring a majoriLT of the residential uses into conformance
with the Mound zoning Code.
All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the o~po~cuniLT to be
beard.
Dakota
poised Rezoning
R-2
April I
RESOLUTION NO. 87-
RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE ANNUAL SALE OF
BUDDY POPPIES BY THE VFI~
~IHEREAS, the annual sale of Buddy Poppies by the
Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States has been officially
recognized and endorsed by governmental leaders since 1922; and
I~HEREAS, V F W Buddy Poppies are assembled by disabled
veterans, the proceeds of this worthy fund-raising campaign are
used exclusively for the benefit of disabled and needy veterans,
and the widows and orphans of deceased veterans; and
WHEREAS, the basic purpose of the annual sale of Buddy
Poppies by the Veterans of Foreign Wars is eloquently reflected
in the desire to "Honor the Dead by Helping the Living".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the' City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby urge the citizens of
this community to .recognize the merits of this cause by
contributing generously to its support through the purchase of
Buddy Poppies on the day set aside for the distribution of these
symbols of appreciation for the sacrifices of our honored dead.
Also urging all patriotic citizens to wear a Buddy Poppy as mute
evidence of our gratitude to the men of this country who 'have
risked their lives in defence of the freedoms which we continue
to enjoy as American citizens.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councllmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councllmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
TO
McCOMBS-KNUTSON
ASSOCIATES INC.
12800 Industrial Park Blvd.
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441
(612) 559-3700
ATTENTION
WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ Attached Fl Under separate cover via
[] Shop drawings [] Prints [] Plans
[] Copy of letter *' O Change order C)
~he following items:
[] Samples rq Specifications
DATE NO.
DESCRIPTION
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
[] For approval [] Approved as submitted
~ For your use r'l Approved as noted
[] As requested [] Returned for corrections
[3 For review and comment []
[] FOR BIDS DUE 19
[] Resubmit ,.
[] Submit
r-I Retum
..copies for approval
copies for distribution
cor~ prints
_ [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
COPY TO
O.
66'
SiTE PLAN FOR
MOUND V.F.W. POST 5113
iN AUD[TOR$'S SUODI¥[S[0N NUHOER 167
HENNEPiN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
,. ~.~ .
Scale: 1" = 30' ·
Date : 3-17-87 qZF_.~, ~-~
Datum: Mound City se~er
~: Existing spot elevation' COFFI'N & GRONOERG,
~: Proposed spot elevation
--.-: Drainage arrow
(~ote: Utility and spot elevation /
information suppl~ed by others
Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners
Long Lake, Minnesota
Proposed Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 87-
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #87-59
MOUND V.F.W. POST 5113, COMMERCE BLVD.
BE IT RESOLVED,' that the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, does hereby amend Resolution 87-59 as follows:
7. The developer shall post a performance bond or irrevocable
letter of credit in the amount of $35,000.
12. Adopting a revised site plan dated March 26, 1987.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember-
The following.Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
75
March 24, 1987
NO. 87- 59
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING VARIANCES FOR MOUND V.F.W. POST 5113,
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 167, fDMMERCE BOULEVARD
~EREAS, the City Council on March 24, 1987, considered a request for the
issuance of parking variances for V.F.W. Post 5113; and
WHEREAS, Section 23.716.2(2) of the Mound Code of Ordinances requires 10 x
20 foot parking stalls and the site plan dated March 17, 1987, indicates 9 x 18
foot parking spaces requiring a space size variance; and
WHEREAS, Section 23.716.3(4) of the Mound Code of Ordinances requires a
fence along, the east side of the site which is zoned R-1 and no fence is
indicated on the site plan requiring a variance; and
~EREAS, Section 23.716.3(1) of the Mound Code of Ordinances limits
driveway entrances to 22 feet in width and the site plan indicates entrances 25
feet in width requiring a three (3) foot variance; and
~EREAS, the principal use of the property is a permitted use in the B-l,
Central Business zone; and
WHEREAS, the proposed variances satisfy the criteria for granting
variances as stated in Section 23.506.1 of the Mound Code of Ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does
recommend approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEDby the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the parking variances are hereby approved subject to the'
following:
An occupancy permit for the building will not be issued until the following
conditions have been met:
1. Review and approval of all plans by the DNR and Watershed District.
Hennepin County shall review the locations of entrances along
Commerce Boulevard and issue a permit for access to the county road.
Parking lot construction shall consist of a perimeter concrete curb
and gutter and 3 inch bituminous surfacing with a minimum 4 inch
Class 5 base.
An easement acceptable to the city engineer shall be Granted along
the drainage ditch.
76
March 24, 1987
e
®
The southern parking lot shall be shifted 3 feet to the north
creating a 6 foot green strip along the southern property line.
A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted for review and
approval by the city planner.
The developer shall post a performance bond in the amount of
$48,000.
Handicapped parking spaces shall conform to code requirements and
shall be appropriately signed.
Exterior signage shall comply with the Mound Sign Ordinance.
Trash dumpster location and screening shall be reviewed and approved
by the building official.
11.
A 6 foot green strip be left between the property line. on the west
side of the parking lot and the parking spaces.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Abel and seconded
by Councilmember Johnson.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Abel, Jensen, Jessen,'Johnson and Smith.
The following Councitmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
3030 Harbor Lane North,
Suite 104
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441
612/553-1950
TO: Jan Bertrand
FROM: Mark Koegler
DATE: April 14, 1987
SOB3: VFW Landscaping
I have reviewed the landscaping plan (enclosed) submitted by VFW Post 5113 for
their new building along Commerce Boulevard. Although the plan identifies a
minimal amount of plant varieties, the plan is adequate and the plantings should
enhance the appearance of the building. Representatives from the VFW stated
that all planting beds will be mulched with wood chips. Due to maintenance
concerns, I recommend that all mulched areas contain rock installed over a poly
base in lieu of the proposed wood chips.
With the one modification noted, approval of the plan is recommended.
S/TE PLAN FOR
MOUND V.F.W. POST 5113
IN AUDITORS'S SUBDIVISION NUMBER 167
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
66'
Frl
66'
Propose&
Scale: 1" = 30'
Date : 3-17-87
Datum: Mound City sewer
~: Existing spot elevation
~: Proposed spot elevation
--~.-: Drainage arrow
!Note: Utility and spot elevation
information supplied by others
COFFI'N & GRONBERG, INC
Engineers, Land Surveyors and Planners
Long Lake, Minnesota
Edward $. Shuckle Jre
City Manager
Dear Hr, Shukle Jr,:
I would like to have a city street light installed
Oaklawn Lane between County Road #110 and Idlewood Road.
'J./
R o,',i D
.!
75 YEARS
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
March 31, 1987
Mr. Allan Gustafson
2929 0aklawn Lane
Mound, MN 5536q
Dear Mr. GustaCson:
Sometime ago you inquired as to whether or not a street light could
be installed on 0aklawn Lane. I am enclosing a copy of a survey done
by Police Officer dohn Ewald a couple of weeks ago. There seems to.
be a mixed opinion as to whether or not a street light should be In-
stalled. Prior to bringing this matter to a'City Council meeting, I
would like a petition signed by you and your neighbors regarding the
support of a street light Installation. Please submit the petition
to me at your earliest convenience, and I will place it~on the City
Council agenda for an upcoming meeting.
If you have any. questions, please contact me.
Edward ~.{t[Shukl., Jr.
Clty Manager
ES:Is
March 14, 1987
To:
From:
Re:
Chief Harrell
Officer Ewald
Street lights on Oaklawn Lane
I made a check with all residents on Oaklawn Lane and the
following report states their reasons for or against addi-
tional street lighting, which was originally requested by
Mr. Gustason, along with a summary there is a map of exist-
ing street lights in the area.
· 2900 Oaklawn Lane 472-1133
I talked with Mr. and Mrs. Larry M. Meehan, who state
that they have teenage children. Because of the age
of their children it doesn't matter to them whether
a street light is put up or not.
· 2901 Oaklawn Lane 472-1653
I talked with Mr. and Mrs. Alfred Heitz. They have no
objection to a street light as the street is .very dark,
but they would like to see the light put in a location
that would benefit everyone on the block.
· 2935 Oaklawn Lane 472-5649
O. Maurer doesn't want any more lighting in the area
as it shines in her windows and bothers her.
· 2942 Oaklawn Lane 472-6817
I talked with Dames W. Hild. He has no children, but
believes that it is too dark in the area. He would
like to see a street light placed at about the center
of the block.
· 2942-Oaklawn Lane 472-4238
I talked with D. A. Sederquist. Has no children but
would like additional lighting in the area. This
resident, lives downstairs.
· 2943 Oaklawn Lane 472-5075
I talked with Mr. and Mrs. Gary C. Dohnson, whose
· children are ages 11 and 14. They would like to see
additional street lighting. They put in a request
for more street lights approximately 10 years ago.
· 2949 Oaklawn Lane 472-5884
Hr. and Mrs. 3ohn C. Anderson have two small children
and would like additional street lights as it is very
dark. Another reason is because of the vacant lot
across the street. ,
· 2953 Oaklawn Lane
472-3266
Mr. and Mrs. Ray R. Cox live on the corner of Idlewood
and Oaklawn and have a street light which lights up
their area. They did state that it is very dark on
th· other end. They have no children.
· 2983 Oaklawn Lane 472-7658
I talked with RafaeI Paz, who is a senior citizen. He
would like to See more street lights in the area for
the safety of the children in the area. Feels it would
detour any burglars or'attempted break-ins.
· 2954 Oaklawn Lane
472-2772
R. N. Lewis states that it is very dark and it would
be nice to have a little more lighting in the area.
2965 Oaklawn Lane
Mrs. Boggs hasfour children.' She would like to see
a street light in the area but doesn't care where it
is located.
· 29710aklawn Lane 472-6190
Mr. and Mrs. Kent M. Christensen'have two small
children who are not yet in school. Feel that in the
future when their children start school it would be
nice to have more lighting in the area. Felt that
the area is dark on one end.
2974 Oaklawn Lane 472-5382
I tried to visit Nicholas S, Novak, No answer.
found out that the telephone was disconnected.
Later
· 2977 Oaklawn Lane 472-1402
Harry Baert believes that the present lighting is
sufficient;, doesn't feel that the city should spend
money on additional lighting.
2929 Oaklawn Lane 4'~2-5802
Mr. Gustason.was the individual that requested the
street light. He has his own lighting (high pressure
sodium) and he doesn't feel that he should have to
pay for the street light. Feels that the city should
furnish the lights to light up the block. Also stated
that he has had vandalism in the past.
In checking this area over during a two week. period
feel that the lighting is as effective as most other
street lighting in Mound, partially due to privately
owned high pressure vapor lighting located at 2929
Oaklawn Lane and 2942 Oaklawn Lane.
If additional street lighting was to be installed I
would suggest that the light be located on either the
east or west side of Oaklawn Lane at Idlewood.
If I can be of further assistance on this matter Chief
just let me know.
c o , ,,/ "rX' t~ o ~ O q, / / o
..Z'OI.£ Woo D R oa l>
C.o.h ~er. O+
/70 ? Dov~ _/~ .~_.
April 5, 1987
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Chief Harre11
Officer Ewald
Street light at Three Points Boulevard and Dove
Over the last few days I have made checks of the lighting
in the area and have talked with all residents in the
area as to what their opinions are for a street light at
this location, which are as'follows:
1601 Dove Lane
Have made numerous contacts over the past week, but have
been unable to find anyone at home.
Ron Klug and Kyle Rier
1604 Dove Lane
They felt a street light was a good idea because it is
dark at the intersection and they both go for walks.
i610 Dove Lane
A street light would not affect this resident, but would
go along if the rest of the neighbors want it.
1609 Dove Lane
The resident at this location has no preference.
1657 Dove Lane
The resident, Marshall Weber, has one small child and feels
it ts very dark in the area of Three Points Boulevard and
Dove. Has also missed the turn coming'home at night.
Arlee N. Mueller
1668 Dove Lane
Has two young children and would like to see a light
installed; also walks at night..
1675 Dove Lane
This resident doesn't fee1 that a street light ts needed
on the corner.
(1)
3. A. Pfarr
1680 Dove Lane
Does not want a street light that will light up her yard.
William Gulden
1701 Dove Lane
Has no children, but would like a street light installed
for extra safety in the area.
A. R. Eberhart
1708 Dove Lane
Would like a street light installed because of vandalism
in the past; didn't report it to the police.
Arthur Friedrichs
1709 Dove Lane
Would like a street light installed as it is very dark on
the corner.
1720 Dove Lane
Vacant house for sale.
1729 Dove Lane
Vacant house for sale.
Lena Sjoberg
5118 Three Points Boulevard
Would like a streetlight installed as it is very dark in
the area. Her neighbor had some vandalism some time ago.
Donald 3. HallidaY
5130 Three Points Boulevard
Would like a street light installed as he has had vandalism
in the past, but never reported it to the police. Also
stated that he feels it is very dark on the corner.
In closing, I feel that the street lighting in the area of
Three Points Boulevard and also north and south on Dove is
as adequate as the other street lighting of the surrounding
streets.. Within the last two years I did a street light
survey on Three Points Boulevard, at which time shortly
thereafter three additional street lights were installed
oK Three Points Boulevard placing one approximately every
other block up and down Three Points.
If I can be of any further assistance Chief just let me
know.
WO ODI~-~ F. OA~
75 YEARS
GITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
Apri] 7, 1987
TO:
FROM:
RE:
.HAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
ED SHUKLE, CITY HANAGER'' '
APPROVAL OF LABOR AGREEMENT BETNEEN THE CITY OF MOUND
.ANO MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAN ENFORCEHENT EMPLOYEES
UNION, LOCAL # 320- PUBLIC NORKS
I have negotiated a tentative agreement with Local 320 - Public Works
for the years 1987 and 1988. This.contract covers ali Public Works
employees (excluding secretary) and unit supervisors. The changes are
as follows:
1. Wages are to be adjusted by 3.5~ in 1987 and 3.5~ in 1988. '
The adjustment is to apply to ali steps and all classifications.
2. Insertion of language regarding.compensatory time off~ This'~as
agreed to in 1986 by Memorandum of'Agreement, which a]]ows"emPloyees
to take compensatory time off.in lieu of cash overtime, at the
convenience of the employer. It also complies to the Fair Labor
Standards-Act (FLSA).
3. Sick leave language is clarlfled to define it, state who is eliglble
and under what conditions.sick leave is'to be used.,
~. ~lmmediate Family~ is defined as it applies to funeral leave.
The agreement applies retroactlvely to January 1, 1987. I recommend to
you to approve this agreement and authorize the mayor and city manager
through resolutlon to sign the agreement on behalf of the city.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
ES:ls
April lq, 1987
RESOLUTION NO. 87-
RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY
MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH
THE HINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 320
PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEES CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the City Manager has negotiated a new two year
Union Contract with the Public Works employees union; and
WHEREAS, said contract would be effective January 1,"
1987 through December 31, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize and direct
the Mayor and the City Hanager to enter into a labor agreement
with the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees
Union, Local 320 (Public Works) to be effective January 1, 1987
through December 31, 1988. Copy of same on file in the Office of
the City Clerk. ..
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councllmember
The following Councllmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
McOombs-Knutson Associates, Inc,
12800 Industrial Park Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55441
612/559-3700
1-800-328-8322 ExL 784
April 7, 1987
Engineers
Planners
Sun, eyors
Honorable Hayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Nound
5341 Maywood Road
Hound, Minnesota 55364
SUBOECT: 1987 Seal Coat Program
M<A File ~6173
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers:
Enclosed is a tabulation of the bids received on Friday April 3rd for the
1987 Seal Coating. Bids ranged from a low of $33,240.00, submitted by Allied
Blacktop to a high of $41,800.00. The Engineer's Estimate for this project was
$38,600.00. Public works is very pleased with the work done by Allied in the
past five years; therefore, we would recommend they be awarded a contract in
the amount of $33,240.00.
If the Council should have any questions, we woUld be pleased to answer
them.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
3ohn Cameron
dC: tdv
Minnesota
Open
Bass
Classics
Tournament Trail
April 6, 1987
Mr. Ed Shukley
City Manager
5341Maywood Drive
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Dear Mr. Shukley
The Minnesota Open Bass Classics tournament trail has
scheduled three tournaments on Lake Mlnnetonka this
sunm~er. Knowing that many tournaments have used the
facilities of the Mound Bay Park adjacent to the old
Surfside Supperclub on Cooks Bay we respectfully
quest the use of the area on 6/7/87 the day following
the Minnetonka Bass Classic Tournament which has al-
ready applied to you for permission.
We will also 'be conducting another weekend tournament
the weekend of 7/18/87, 7/19/87, again we would like
to use the Mound Bay Park. We will be conducting Bass
Tournaments on these dates and have applied for the
necessary permits from the State DNR, LMCD, and the
Hennlpin County Sherriffs Water Patrol.
The hours of the tournaments will be from 5:30 AM to
3:00 PM on all dates. These are all catch and release
tournaments.
If I may be of any further assistance please contact me
at 472-7926. Thanking you in advance for your coop-
eratlon In this matter.
Michael Gerber V.P.
Tournament Director
P.O. Box 185
~~Mound, Mln ~~364
Minnesota Open Bass P.O. Box 195 Mound, Minnesota 55364
Date
1/27/87
Name/NUmbe r'
//12
//13
#15 .
#16
//17
#18 .Hoftelg
#1g Glenn Smith
//20.
//21 Mason
//22
//23
#2~
//25
PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN OF RECREATIONAL EQUIPHENT
Page 3
'Address/LocatiOn
5001Woodridge Road
Oversized & too-close to road
5013 &.5017 Avon. Drive
Too close to the road
2032 Arbor 'Lane
Oversized boat
2039 Arbor Lane
Overs i.zed boat
5016 Edgewater Drive
Trailer full of debris,, refrigerator/garb-
age cans with no cove~s
50qq Edgewater Drive
Too close to road
2216 Noble Lane
School bus
2166 Overland Road
Too close to road
2138 Noble Lane
Oversized boat
5qa7 Breezy Road
Oversized boat 53q6EQ
& 5qq8 Spruce Road
5505 'Spruce ROad
Too close to road
5517 Spruce Road
Oversized boat
2217 Lynwood Boulevard
Oversize boat
.626q Red Oak Road - across from
8+ boats, RV & wood pile
Page 1
Date
1/27/87
PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN. OF RECREATIONAL 'EQUIPHENT
Name/Number
Address/Location
#1. Reese
#2 Bailey
#3
Eagle Lane
Corner of Bluebird & Woodland Road
5036/50~0 Enchanted Road
plex apartment building)
#5
Sha leen
Ztgq9 Three Points Boulevard
Cross Country RV
1833 Shorewood Lane
Trailer, car under tarp, 3 speed boats, etc.
# 6 HenderSon
18/48 Shorewood Lane
Oversized boat too close to road
#7
//8
Dennis dohnson
3. Westland
1928 Shorewood Lane
Too close to road - 2 boats
1932 Shorewood Lane
20~0 Shorewood Lane - vacant 1or & lot
next door~
Boat storage - oversized boats on property
//9
1956 Lakeside Lane -.Vacant lot next door
RV from across the street --
//10
'1801Re~thaven Lane
Oversized boats
//11 Babler'
1785 Resthaven Lane
Too many boats
#12 Blanchard
17q9 Resthaven Lane.
Oversized boat
31/40 Priest Lane
RV
Boat too close to street across from him.
3185 Priest Lane/end of Priest Lane
Oversized &. too close to the road
#15
Westedge & Setter Circle
Boats at curb line HN7056
#16
Corner G1enwood Road $ Highland Boulevard
African Queen
HN 3805 DH - gray house
//17
5573 Bartlett Boulevard
Oversized boat
Page 2
Date
1/27/87
PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN OF'RECREATIONAL EQUIPHENT
Name/Number
#18
#19 Jon.Nelson
#20 Grudnowski
#21 Bede11
#22
#23
#2~ City Property
Second roll of film
1/27/87 # i
# 2 Smykalskl
//3
#5
# 6 Hetchler
# 7 A. H. Empson
'# 8 Ronald HcCombs
# ~ Smith
#10
#11
Address/Location
5525 Bartlett Boulevard
Adjacent to wetlands across the street
Bartlett Boulevard
Oversized boat on vacent lot - HN8~OqEB
5~-~08q
5259 Bartlett Blvd.
'Oversized boat
2625 ~ilshire Blvd.
Oversized boat (only 2 on premises)
(rents out space in summe~?)
q932 Bedford Road
Oversized boat? too close to street
a~7q Brunswick Road
OversiZed bOat ·
Corner Brighton & Alton- ,
· Neighbors use as a storage y~rd
$1~!2 Tuxedo Boulevard' across the street
Oversized boat
~\-"~5180 Tuxedo Blvd.
Oversized boat too close .to street.
3232 ~/arner Lane - across from
RV too.close to Road & oversized
Lanark& Tuxedo Blvd.
Boats too close to road
RV 66~!~.
3207 Roxbury Road
~ Boars'in street right-of-way ,
q913 Island View Drive
~925 Island View Drive - permit ?
~767 Island View Drive
Too close to road S oversized? probably
h705 Island View Drive
School bus - Alaska plat&
~625 Island View Drive
Too close to road with boat on hill
"Catch 22"j
30a3 Island View Drive
RV trailer home with tarp
PAGE#113 5
MBER DATE ADDRESSED SUBJECT COMPLIANCE DATE
86/95A 10-27-861 Ron Krueger ~ Ass0c'iates, Survey for 2~0~ Tuxedo! .Complete info. on future
8080 Wallace Rd.,EdenPrairie ''surveys
--~ 55344
86,,- IO-27-86 Bill Davis, Gustafson & Asso. 5377 Shoreline Blvd. Return in 5 days.
~ Balboa MN. Inc., 5340.Shore:' Grading Permit
line. Blvd., Mound
86/97 10-27-86 Curtis A. Pearson Reg. PrOp. Abstract for Review tltle
Cobblestone Cove, app.
" S Final plat
86/98 10-~9-86 Darrell W.& Nancy L Barclay Division of tax.parcel
2666 Westedge B1vd. Lots 3 & 4, B1E 1, Bat-
Mound, MN. 55364 dorf's First Addn. &
..... demo. permit required ·
................. for fire damaged 9arag~
86-99 11~13-86 Tim White, 2137 Centerview'Ln deck unconstructed & 15 days to remove strut
............ · .................... incomplete/permlt exp. roof
............................ dOeS.not meet codes.
86/10C 11-14-86 Gary Heines, q~2q Bedfor'd 'Rd~ 61'51 Bartlett Blvd· 15 days to remove ~ebr~,
. ......................... Accumu. lation of debris etc.
.......... . ........ materialS'$campet.'"tra iler
86/101 i1-1q-86 Judd..& Debra.Lu~sse.,..'3225 Debris & storage of rec If any violations, 30
..... AmhUtSt.Lane-:.i'-' .... vehicles, etc. dags to correct
86/102 11-iq-86 Heigl Mtg. Co.,-Attn. Barba"ra. ~Oq8 3 Pts. Blvd. 30 days to correct
Cole,q510..West"77th 5t;,Edina Accumulation of debris,
55q35 ........... etc.
8~O3 11-.18-86 Wm. McQueen,q985 Mpls.Av., . .54q~ Tonkawood Road -3(~Jays to take care of
' Mound 55364' ' Accum.of debris & 48 hours (due to fire')"
secure/'removebuilding
86/1Oq 11-19-86 Jerome Neumann, 5979 Bartlett Illegal fence Remove fence or apply
......... '.' ............... constructed no permit for variance within 10
f ......................... days
86-105 11-26-86 Gary'Brown, 5971 Gumwood Rd. Accum. of tires, etc. 15 days to remove/recycl
L 86-10( 12-2-86 Melvin Bosma,4663 Suffolk Rd. Bldg. beyond scope of 5 days to get permit/
· re-roof permit
I 86-10' 12-5-86 .Letters to: Commercial Signage Requ re-
'Bethel United Methodist., 2116 ments; Submit app. in 10 days.
Commerce.;'.Small Treasures,485~
Shoreline Btvd.; Sunlite Tan-
nlng Studi. o,2337-.Wi, lshi. re.-BlYd.
Westonka-Oance StUdio;'2337'Wilsh'
~108 12-12-Ub Kenneth KowalkJ~ 6bbl'~tY.~a ~eu/ ~anchescer Rd. 15 days to correct
r 6,Maple Plain 55359/Ada Bede 1 Yd & house full of
3022 Shoreline Dr., Wayzata food,garbage & debri
.... . ..... .'55391' Inoperable veh.
16-10 ' 12-23-86 John N. Curtis, q619 Kildare Accum. of debris & 30 days to correct
Rd. materials
6-110 12-23-86 Steven R. Bohnhoff, 4687 I.V Const. without proper 10 days to submit app.
Drive. permit
i
PAGE#113
tMBER DATE ADDRESSED ., , 4
~uout~l COMPLIANCE DATE
16/73 7-23-86 Gregory. Busse, 3038 Dqndee. Ln. Storage bldg. on prop- ] 30 days to remove out-
Thomas Forester. 3061Alexan+ e~ties deter!orat!.ng : building..
der & needs removing.'
~6/74 7-2q-86 David Huggett, 2919 Hazel~ood ~ill eroding onto neigh- 30 days to sod/lan,' ape
Lanet Mound (sc) bor's land
·
86/75 7-24-86 M/M Thomas..Je.rdee., 5917 Gum- Install pool without 10 days to get permit for
woo'd'ROad'". ......... .' permit pool & fence
86/76 8-15-86 Michael Scott, 500~ flosedale
Road Use violation 26.01 8- 10 days to remove carpet,
--"-' .............. 23,.604.. refrlg.,stove, etc & bring
..... ""." .... '."'.'."'.'.". ..................... Into compliance
86/77 8-15-86 Richard..A...'Olexa~:.6609..Bart- 'Expire~ Bldg. Pe'r~it 10 days to arrange final
· Lett'BlVd~ ............... 6763 lnsp.
86/78 8-15-86' Ma'rgaret .Thorne, 5012 Edge- Expired Bld~.Permit 15 days to arrange final
water'Dr;" '~ .... 6591,6232 & 5715 lnsp.
~6;79 8-15-86 ................. Robert Ol. son,-.442~. .............. Denbigh Rc. Expired Permit 6613 !$ days to arrange final
lnsp.
86-80 8-15-86' ..CarT. F,..JohnsO~,.6~3 Bay' ExPired Permit 6649 15 days to arrange final
'Ridge'Rd', Mound insp.
86/81 8-15~86 Gary Robt. B1tx~qS~5 Lanark Accumuiation of debris 15 days t~ correct
Rd.
86/82 8-19-86 H/M J. Rusthoven,§15 Marshal Debri. s on public access 15 days to remove or
Ave.',St.~ad1:5510~ &.'M/M. City take action to
dohn Hurd~ 1579 ~ull Lane assess
86/83 8-26-86 !John'Royer,BenFranklin Store, Temp. structure on S. Remove by 9-1-86 or make
2281 Commerce Blvd. side of Store arrangement to construct
to code.
~667-d~ 9-q-86 Edna Enstad, .q746'Bedford Rd~ Debris accumulation 15 days to correct.
'~'7~-$ 9-5-86 .... Oel..Matheson~5062..Ba~port Rd[.~ Debris, car, etc. 15 days to correct
86/86 9-'&'-86... Ha~ci. son~p~. D~l~r~h ~o',.~-' accumulation
~ ~ .-~.~..,' .~-~ ' 26~7 'Co.mmerce Blv~ Meet B.O. week of
~.~-~S Ya.~ ' ~4,'-m~., .,_, ·
/~'~.~iba:aaG-:AYe., ~t;Pa~]'~.105 ..... No'.repa~rs done Call within 5 days.
86/87 9-19-8~ M/H Richard E. Sne].1, 702'.Oak 572~ Lynwood Blvd. 15 days to correct, etc~
wood Dr,~.'Anoka~ HN.-.55303. Accum.debris~ unlicens, d
cc~'"Ke~'Berresi'572~'LynWo0d yehicle,no garbage can lids
86/88 9-19-86 Sam:Hancl. no, ~216 27th Ave. Accum. debris q618 KillJare 15 days to correct -
-.. 'S,.t-.Hpl. s.-.55~O6.'-cc:..,..Gerl .....
..... Pablson~.h618.Klldate ..............
86/89 9-22-86 Mound Super~tte, M/M ~cott Sec. 23.625 violation .remove by 9-25
Brickley, 2q42 Commerce Blvd. car "for salW' in CBD
parking lot /
86/90 10-10-U6 Sungold Homes, q35 ~ater St,, 291q Bradford Lane 10 days to hear & -
Excelsior, MN. 55331 .. foundation peer support correction or removal
.... system'not.'to code by 1-1-87
86/91 10-10-86 Brookhaven .Homes, Inc., Mr. R~taining ~a11' i~ pu~li: Remove' within 37 days -
..... Bart Porter,'15572 Red Oak r~ght-of-way at 3018 or file for variance
Rd.S~E.,Pr]Or Lake,MN. 5537~ Devon i by 10-22-86
cc: DonPeterson,K.P.Propert~s, .
32 Interlachen-.Court~Tonka..B~y 55331 '
Clt¥'M~r;.&.St;,SUptt ......
'"86/92 10-14-86 John T. Miller., 3149 Inver[ Ac'cum. of.debris, coml. ~O days to correct --
ness Lane .... . veh.,'unliCensed tra!lers
MN. 56315 '" ." ........ ,n open garage~ etc.
86/9q 10-20-86 Randy Bickmann, 815 Cedar Av~:. 5516 Lynwood Blvd. , .~ ---
S.,.Mpls., MN. 55qOq cc: , Hazardous Bldg.
Loretta E.. Corbett,.3512. Texa.
I Av;S:~ St:'Louis Park 55q26
~(9_~ .10-20-86t Geor'g~ L~c~rem, 4601 Bruce S', 3155 Inverness' Lane I a
Edina 55424 cc: Owner/occu- Accum. debris,materials
· PAGE#113
3
3ER DATE ADDRESSED. ' ' SUBJECT COMPLIANCE DATE
~/h8 .5.~g-86 John E. Royer,. Ben Franklin ~' [nc|nerator~being used] Take out of service today
~-3 Store, 2281 Commerce Blvd. in vlol. of UFC Sec. : & remove dn|t In 30 day~.
11.]16.
~ 5-Z8-86 H/M J RusthoYen, ~15 Marshall AccumulatiOn of debris 50 days to clean up
Ave., St. Paul.~ HN,..~$5101 ...... . &..mater.J. als at 5040
.................. EnChahted'Road ................
6/4~ 6-~-86 ~r. uonn doyce, b31.1 Hilton 50~3'Enchanted ~°ad ......
COurt, Pine Sprl. ngs~ HN.'..551C3-.No-.garbage cans..and .-. days to correct
cc': Tenant~'..5Oq3'£nehanted"~:a~cumulatlp~,'Of'pa.rb~~ .... .., ,
6/5~ 6-q-86 Dennis Johnson (Estate)'3837: 1928. Shorewood Lane 10 days to 'contact.City
" 2~thAve, S.', Mpls, 55406. Not. connected to City ~O.discuss
. cC: p.~.~. ~reg.:Sk!.nne~' & ........ ~ater & Se~er Lines
Jim'Thompson.':. .............. .... · ......
6/51 6'-4-86 oa'n Sicheneder~- J-7=3~"..ShOre-' .... Res,.85-22' driveway 30 days to change drive~.
wood,'LanF'"..~'".;f?'{~'', .... , .... n0t'as'apprpye~ . . way entry.
;~/52 6-10-86, Steven. Coddon, 4629 Abetdeen .Trail.er. Park 5 day to remove trailer
. :. im ~ar
Rd,,(C~r[ified,~l~,~¥ Mgr.;;°§635' Halstad Avenue and decks
~/$3 6-]1-86! Balboa Minnesota'Co, Attn,: ~eldlng.- Solarium 30 days to have approved
Irene Porter,..5340 Shorelines;' Systems..'area. requires by approved'inspector.
· : .... · ...... . ........ "~.' ......... spe6ial'ihs'pector-
6/54 6~12_86 .... ~/M Cra'l.g M,.. Hi. ll. erns,..)721.' .. Oemo)Ition permit for 5^~ay~ to get permit
...... Gd11.;.Lane'.:."' :..:.'.:.' '.'.~: '.::.' :..' '.'.' '1717'Gu!1 . )u0 ~
16/55 6-12~86 'p~'f..::G~l~'ih~'~'6OS.'~este'dge',' "NO.'b'U'i'ld'i~9 permit 5 days to 9et permit
f6/56 6-16-86 City Council .& City Manager Signage for.Mound's
I.n~redible.Fes~ival
16/5:Z--. .6-26-86 Balboa Minnesota, .Inc,, Att'n. Completion S. correc~i.ors Maximum to complete
· Phil P~ppler~ 5340 Shoreline of.ltems.in'Balboa listed items 60 days
Blvd., Moundcc: Paul Purkel Bldg. Per' 3/35/86 letter(no add1. construction)
5300 Shoreline Bl'vd,.' &..Bruce. ...
Oah19ren~ 5340 shorel.ine ...... .
~6/$8 · 7-1S~6 Eric A1]~, 1916 .ShOrewood'Ln. Accum. of debris +' tlr~s 5 days to remove
~6/$9 7-~z86 S~F~A~lA~O'Shorewoo'd 'L~, ,' "' " + tlr(s 5 days to remove
B6/60 7-1-86 Dennis Johnson, 38~7 24th Ave., Connect to Mun$cipal 30 days to Insp. permit
..... S,.~ HplS,.,--$5406..cc~.-,Greg.-. Sewer Service 90 days (10-1-86) to.
..... :..:. skinner ............. .... .... ... complete
~6-61 ~-~-86' Ms. Brenda Jo .01son,-~92S~-Edge-. Insufficient garbag~ ca,~s '15 days to get adequaL
water D.r.,~ MOund"cc:''Jbne .H~and : number
86-62 7-11-86 ~/MGerald Ya~nes, dr~,.5440'. Accumulation of. debris 15 days to correct/
LynwOOd'Blvd...' '
86-63 7-15-86 Norma'~..Hemeri. ck~.-q~t6-.Beachsi-ce. Bldg. Permit 6050 15 days to arrange
Lane','. ...... .'.".'.:'.".'..'.'-'..'-'-..'-'.'..'"expired progress/final insp.
86-6q 7-15-86 E'u~ne S;'SumsRis;qY.5~'Bur~'s'Fd;'B1dg;Pern~it'6269 Ex~. 15,,days to arrange insp~
86/65 7-15-86 Clark'Peters,2146' Noble Lane Bldg. Permit 6419 exp. 15 days to arrange insp:~
86/66 7-]5-86 Ronald NOrstrem, 4957'ljV.Dr. Bldg. Permi.t 6467 exp. 15 days to arrange insp._
86/67 7-15-86 James C. Hendr|cks-, 3006 West- Bldg. Permit 6503 exp. :15 days to arrange insp.
ledge B1~d.
86/6'8 7-15-86 joe Sz~'rke;l~56'~'horewood Ln;. Bldg. Permit 6554 exp. 15 days to arrange insp~-
186/69 7-15-86 Jeanne M. 01son/Geo,..Millford Bldg.Permit 6574 exp. 15 days to arrange insp.
, 2270'tangdon'tane .........
86/~~ Vernon B~andenburg,~ BIdg. Permit ~ 15 days to arrange insp.
shi.r~'Blvd~ .............
7-1 -86 M/M Mark Moriarity,4g07 Yi]- . Unlicensed &/or inoper'
shire Blvd.. ............ ' ....... a~le..vehlcles $ viola-130 days to correct
.......:...... ....... t~on'of'Home'OcC. Ord.. ,
186/72 I 7-22-86 ~a¥ El'lis, 3801 5th St. iN.~., Permits 6~60'&'6~88 exP' 15 days to arrange insp.
I
i
4pls., MN. 55421 on 4625 Lakeside Ln. -
IBER
86/24
86/25
86/26
86/27
86/28
86~29
86/30
86/31
86/32
86/3
86/3
86/3
86/36
86/3]
86/3[
86/33
86/4(
86/41
86/43
86/44
86/45
86/46
86/47
DATE ADDRESSED .'
4/21/86 {'"Hike.Bar}ow; 2072"Commerce.-
'Blvd: .......
4/22/86
4-23-86
4-23-86
4-29-86
4-30-86
5-2-86
5/8/86
Frank L. Mi. ttelstaedt, 5005
ewater"-Dt; .......... : ..... et.c;'unenclosed in.yard
Hatthew J. Phlllippi, 21155 4721 Manchester Road
PAGE#113
2
' SUBJECT COMPLIANCE DATE
.i Selling vehicles from ] Cease & desist selling
R-3 i vehicles..
Accumulation of materia's '7 days to remove
cbrrect.
Minnetonka. Blvd.., Shorewood 5!
Eugene G. Schlee, 3140 North
Harbor Lane# 101, Bldg, 3,
;441
Gordon L..Wolf, 4610 Kildare
Road cc: 'Jim Larson ..
Todd Saterbak., 1724 Canary'
Russell A.'Wltham, 2620 Hal-
steadl. Lane:.:cc:,. Darrall.'l...Wi. 1
5051'Wobdland'.ROad .....
Oean W.'Hunter, 5043 Tuxedo
Wm-R.HarriSon,.1829 Carroll
Av.,St. Paul 55104.
cc: Craig M..Claybough &
Leo.E. Gosl'in,'.670~'.'Hay~tead..
Hr. Kenn'eth-Ket.chum~..1669..
;331 tenant dumping on
3000.Inverness. Road
"Accum. of debris etc..
at 3000 Inverness Lane
· Finch'Lane". ................ : .....
Hike Malaske,6557 Bartlett Accumulation of materia
&' &.-debris incl. removal
"TOm"'LagOiP 'Ba.~tlett. i.i bf. lwhlte.~stor.shed~ etc.
5-12-86 Leon'Hafison;.'.2355;.Fai.~gi. ew'L~ .'Aecumu~atl.0n.:of:.debris
5- ~hen &-Mi~helle.Kokale~.r. '3121'o0nald'Orige .....
5-13-861 .DeanLaForest~..4920..~l~shl. re.. l. noperable/unlicensed
............................ vehicle~"& Pts' ·
.Debra M..Hipp~ . Accumulation debris
5-15-86
5-
cc: Thomas. Green, 4'037-
Sunset Dr.~Sp~-Pk,,.55384
Reply to pekmit request
to-do work at 4610 Kild
Debris.& materials on
yard
5051 Woodland Road
-~.Accumulation of debris
etc,
Accumulation debris, nu
materials'& equipment
Accumulation of debris,
ma[erial, etc., need
proper garbagecans &
.have.inoperable/
Accumulation of debris
30 days to remove/etc.
30 days to remove
30 days to correct
~e rous
30 days to clean up.~
15 days to correct
~s to clean up
David M, Heinsch, 2147 Grand-
view'Blvd. Mound cc: Police
Randy EL Bi.ckmann, 815 Cedar
Ave. S.w Mpls. 55404
Peggy E. Bryant, 5852 Idlewoo.
Ave., Waconia,'MN. 55387
clean up/removed.at
:1584 Finch Lane
Illegal concrete busine
facility at 2147 Grandv
5516 Lynwood Blvd.
Accumula:ion o~ debris
Met with re. hazardous
5-28-86- R.J.Fischer, P,O. Box 328, ..-
'MOU~d ............
5-28-86 Robert J. Veilleux, S
Tuxedo Blvd. '
5-28-86
g-~0'86
Brookhaven Home~, Waters Edge
Office Place, Suite 105B,
6885 Bondin St., Prior Lake 5
Eon Ande:soo. Rercill LYgGP
5842 Idlewood Rd.
Thank yOu/copy of
fence ord.'about mate~
to' clean up
accumulation (sofa)
at 2152 Belmont Lane
.~iishire. Blvd.'
~ired'Bldc Permit"
Oecaylng wood problem
3018 Devon Lane,' ~
sand in st, permit exP
;372 remove debris &
l~ndsc~pe w/erosion cc
Z~O~ Oaklawn"Ln~
day: .
15 days to correct
;S
'ew
30 day to remove/correct
30 days to " "
clean up before 5-1~-86
o~ City wi11 cause it tc
be done & assessed to
property. _L~_~_--u.~ ~
Oiscontinue by 6-1-86
'15 days to correct -.~
"115 da~s 'to correct -
lO'days to remove &
boa rd u~p bldg
,ulldin9 ~,,~. ~['~~
ials allowed sent
By June 1, 1986
30 days to complete -
'.'.'&'arrange lnspec '.n '-
30 days to move
~ ' 48 hours for' sand;
[red 30 days for erosion
'. codtrol & 7/27/86 fo
nt?l/Comp.letion
I ~_~Z~. ~_~,
19B6 pAGE~i~3
' #1
}MBEE ~ DATE ADDRESSED ' ' SUBJECT COMPLIANCE, DATE
~/1 1-6-86 HerbAnderson 2636 Tyrone LN., Non-conforming sign J'.
~/2 1-/-~6 M/M Roger Eager, 1649 Gull Ln. ~ccumulation of ~ebris 30 days to cqrre~t..
' & materlals, veh~les, ~
O ..... -' etc, ·
~ ------8-:~'6~~ Larson, City "Attorney Encroachment of garage Send Podany notice of
........... ~ ........ · ............... onto nelghbor~s prop. pending legal action if
............... · ............ Ned'POdanY~'6165'Sincl 'r not corrected/removed.
6/q 1-13-86 M/M Charles..Wei. be], No tihal i6~pectio~"Ekp, I0 days to arrange
5047 ~ren Road ..... Bldg. Permit #6684(8-8-80 for inspection
16/5. 1-23-~6 To 'whom it may concern Occupancy o~ building" ~greement to obtain permi
VFW, 2544 Commerce BIvc.'repalr. furnace, etc. &
· . ~ermlt for elec. work
.~ Re~ve various items, et~
~ months to correct plbg.&
remove storage from base~
~6/6 3-10-~6 Memo to Jim Larson,' P~osecuti ~g Formal Complaint at
Atty. 2235 Langdon Lane,
...... -' · John Babler Residence ~'__.
86/7 3-10-86 ..... Nm. Al. exander omA. Capt. Biily:s Final inspection -. 60 days to be installe:.
' ' .... 5241'ShOrellne'B]Vd' · no makeLup air unit & tested.
86/8 3-14-86 Waterford. Proper. tles,'.lnc, Chapman Place, 2670' Prior.to buildi6g occu
· 4969 01son Memor.lal. Hwy, ........ Comme~ce..Bl-lling for pancy submit covenants.
M~ls., MN;'55422" ..... .''.'.'''"' Engr.:.;..Lega. l.&'Plane.in9 Fees assn. & declaration.
86/9 3-27-86 Robert Triplett, 4571Wilshire Expired Bldg. Permit 30 days to complete
Blvd., Mound ..... # 6777 age pr renew permit.
86/10 3-27~86 Steve Bergesen,-951.W.-Central 5317 Piper Road Garbage all over front
_~ AVe., St;'Pa6I'5510~ ........... . yard - 15 days to Corr,:
3-27--:~-~ ~i-~-&T~-~~4925 ~5 Drummond Roa-'---~-'-'~ 15 ~a~s to correct '-
Drummond Road .... Garbage all over, n°
..................... covers on cans
'86/12 ~-27-86 J~net H~sselbrlng~ 49~9.:Oru~ :Ga'rbage'all over, no 15 days to correct
mond Road ....... ' .' ........ covers'on cans '
; 86/13 3-31-86 Ronald R. Kranzler, 20145 Parl 5137 Hanover Road-Unlocced 15 days to clean up
Place,.Deephaven, MN. property with accumulat on and secure house..v/
· of debris incl. garbage
I86/14 4-I-86 Union "76", Robert Reutlman, 4831 Shoreline Blvd. 24 hours to remove temp.
305.East..Rlce'St.~..Wayzata, Violation of CUP & Sign 4'X 6 sign.
~MN.'55391 ................... Ord,
I86/15 4-2-86 Thomas Green~ 4037 ~unset Dr. '1584 Finch Lane Accumu- 15 days.to remove &
'Sp;Pk,. 55384"cc: Owner/.OCcup~,nt lat.ion of debris correct
/86/16.... 4'14-86~ curt PearSon, CityAttorney 2942 Oaklawn Lane
! 4-21-86 Letter to'Robt. C.Holberg,Jr. Hild vs. City of Mound Ans. rec'd from Holberg~
86/ . . 30 days to clean up
i~' 4-14-86 Ms Peggy E Bryant Accumulation of ~ebris
5852 IdlewoodRoadi Mound
I 'l~l~ 4-14-86 Nail Schoenhofen, 6116 Bart- Accumulation of debris 30 days to clean '
lett Blvd.
L6/i9 I 4-15-86 Dick Johnson, 1709 Canary Ln' Ponding of water on Correct.in ~O days.
own & neighbor's prop.' . . .
14-15-86 M/M Tim Harrel, 1732 Cana~yLn. Renting sgl.family res. Cease & desist rental
cc: Tom Turner, Merrill Lyncl as duplex use & arrange insp..3~
& Robert C. Jasper _ _ ~ da~s ....
-~6~86 M/M PeterW;-Johnson, 3140 Flnal'|~--sP~--'"~f'3140~P'~iet'~t~lOin~p.'~days veYifyt°'arrang~elevati~.re':
I~ Priest Lane .ngt done.
86/23 'q-lO-Ob 'Earl Nielsen,12900 St. avl L~ts at Maywood Md. & -
i Road, Mtka., MN. 55343 HiddenVAle Ln. filling Get grading permit & r~
move fill from right of
without permit ' way.
PAGE#11~
IMBER DATE ADDRESSED ' ' SUBJECT
.... ~U~rLIRN~E DATE
~/85 9-16-85 BernardA. Ouhachek, 19~7 La_k.~- Debris ~ateriais on~ 15 days to correct
..... si.de .Lane~...Moun~,'~N; ........ lot-a'cross.'s'creet~ Lo~ ...............
............ . ..... . ....... 8, Block'7;'Shady~ood ~Pt; ............... .~-
'7/85 9-16-85 Paul Scherber, 3900 Walden Cease & des'lst using
access°rYrental bldg' for . .~'i~19850ct'1'~ d~ ·
Rd.,
Vayzata
55391
;~/85 9-20-85 M/N.Gayl.e. Schuf~enhauer*.. Bldg. retaining wall 10 days to submit appl.
6350 Ramble~.Lane..,... ..... ..no-permit
~/85 9-20-85 Ms. Kim O. Ryan .......... Bldg. retaining wa11 10 days to submit appl
;0/85 6363'Rambler"Lane ............ no'permit '
9-24-85 Roger& Betty J. Drews Being operated as autc 15 days to cease & desist
5646 V. Hearn, Glendale, AZ. repair in viol. 23.63~
85306 cc: Jeff Moot (5084 Three Points BI~J.)
~1/85 9-25-85 Ms. Elizabeth Fitz No final insp. P. 6468 10 days to arrange access
6380 Acorn :Road.'" :'~* .....
-72/85 9-25-85 John Leu, 3107'Argyle'Lane.'. ;: NO'final; 'lnsp. P # 6493 IO'%da~s~ %~'~gi~cces'"~
.73/85 9-25-85 L'inda Ledray~6016'BeachWOod.* ..... . .p #.6440 ,,
7q/85 9-25-85 Jack'Ostgig;.'4718'Hampton.-R'd , .. p # 6464 ,,
'75/85 9-25-85 PatriCk'*FO.le~'q633.*.ManCheStet'". ,, P # 6515 ,,
76/85 9-25-85 Gary 'Shaleen;183~'Shor¢~ood.. ... ,, p # 6656 ,,
77/85 10-~-~5 Hs.gatherine U.l&ason,-4u/~ W.
51st St., Edina 55424i*CC: 3137' Donald Drive' Obtain permits to correct
Clinton Gables,4431Dorcheste ~us~i~hi~J~ dayA
Mi chae 1 O' Oonne 1'1,215 S. Cedar ~~~,~'~r'~~lll~.u-
Lake Or.,..Mpls...55405'..& Tl.m ......
ShannOn~255..~i11.St;;.E~:. ..........
78/85 10-11-85 Dave Heinsch DBA Built Rite Exterior storage g 10 days to remove.
Concrete, 2147 Grandview.Blvd. debris on City Parking
· Lot behind. House of Mo
79~85 10-24-85 A.1an..Greene~,.2645~Casco Pt', 5013 Avon.Drive, Hound Code requirements
Vayzata, 'MN.''5'539'1"cc:Marily~ Hinricks,5013 Avon corrected within 30 days
80/85 10-28-85 Bruce Ahr, 11427 ~. River.. Boat storage on Lots 15 days to remove
Hills Dr., Burnsvl-lle, MN.55.;3~ 18 S 19, Blk.6 Dream- house boat
cc:'Vllard E..Morton,.3430 wood PID 13-117-2421 0013
List'Place'*Mp1.s.,MN;55416
81./85 10-28-85 Robert E. Meyer, 5652 Twin Boat storate on vacant ~4~ days to remove
Lake Terr., Crystal, HN. 5542 land PID 13-i17-2421 boat
0055
82/85 10-28-85 John Es. sameia~3~}~%a~l-e:~:. No .permit for deck 10 days to submit app.
....... 100 E,. School..St,.~. Carl. l. sl.e, 6382 Maple.Road
.... I0~a*'50047'*'.'". ....... . .......
83/85. 10-30-85 Mr. F. Germain~ 3567 Crystal Accumulation of debris I0' days to remove debri~
Pl.ace~ Navarre,. MN...55392' at'4560 Dorchester Rd. g provide proper con-
'8q/85 10-31-85 ~m. Riley Harrison,'1829 Car~., Accum. of debris,garbac~ .?'T~.'e¥~~
roll Ave. St. Paul 55104 ~'e ~--. -
~o~ containers," lU eays to remove debris
~ i~ get garbage containers
re-roofing without pern ~ obtain permit
inoperable Chevrolet Cenero
85/85 11-4-85 Mr.&Mrs. Paul...Mei. sel.,..5501 . Reroofing wit'hout permit 10 days to obtain
Ba~tlett'Bl~d:.* ............ 2nd'structUre.on. p.rop~ty permit
86/85 11-8-85 Robert H. Kruse 2333 Fairview Automobile repair ser- cease and desist immed~/
vice from home i
87/85 11-20-85 Denis G. Halleron, 3179 Devon Boats, trailer i~ front Cease & desist parking
.......... : ......................... yard &.constructing boats In front yd. & get~
· radio'to~er'~ithout per,it bldg.permit for rowe,
Steven Coddon, P,O.Box 175, Mtka~Highlands. Hobi. le'* .... Can*'-t .replace trailers
88/85 11'22'851 Mound Home Parb . ~ !~ :c "~ :cc
12-19-85 Nick Johnson,lB5 Hound Ave'. t '~ewate ,///'
113
PAGE#,~
~BER DATE ADDRESSED · · SUBJECT COHPLIANCE DATE
~h/85 6-20-85 Rainier Corp,, Pis..Coqnie. Ben 5014 through'5028 J Block off & discontinue
nlngton, 1809 S'.Plymouth Rd. Shoreline Blvd. Apts. i use until fixed.
Pipls., PiN. 55~q~ cc: Wanda balcony, decks deterioration
McCuai ~,-~ ~' --~-' ~'~- ~'-'~l~-'d~'~'--~' cease Sus
~5---/~ 7-1--~- 5 ~5809 Granav~ew ·
Blvd. business in res.zone 30 days to get permits
Fire damaged accessory for fire damaged bldg.
building not repaired o
remove d
~'6'/85 ' 7-1-85 Cari~ R. lianson, P.O. Box 1'8c.? 5'cj32 Beachwood Road Al iow insp. prior to 7/15
St. Paul HN. 55111 Bring request back'by
' 7-17-85
47/85 7-1-85' Jon Elam Lot splits & iot's'~f
· . record , .
48/85 7-1-85 James Lassek, 2q31 Wilshire O~erat,ng auto repair,
30 days to cease .auto/boO
Blvd. etc. in residential & repa,r $ remove oeor,s
accumulation of debrls~ etc.
49/85 7-2-85 Robert 01son, qq2q Denbigh Expir~'~l Bldg. Permit Renew permit by 7-'15-85
or complete work & arran,
Rd. final, inspection
50/85 ..... 7-8-85 Bradley R. & Lynett~ Johnson 638~ Lynwood Boulevard
2250 W. Grand Ave.,Long Lake, Sewer & Water lack'of
HN. 55356 cc: Greg Skinner, stub-ins &'policy
P:W'; 'City'pigr';& City Engr.
51/85 7/8/85 Pi/Pi Roger Kesteloot, 5342 Need re-inspection of 5 days (July 15, 1985)
Piper Rd. addn. & permit pulled
for sidin~l house
I 52/~ 1-8-85 Pi/pi Richard Lee,. 50'73 Tuxedo Arrange re-inspection 30 days to comple'~e
Blvd. : for garage, permit 6253 ,;rrange re-inspection
& get permit for re- days to get permit for
roofin~l house re-roofing house
3/85 7/1~/85 ~atricia E. 3~1y "' ~ence property line ~0 clays..
4765 ,W i 1 sh i re' B 1.vd; -... d i s. pute
54/85 7-26-85 Rev. & Hrs. C. Lee~liuff Operating auto repair 30 days to cease~ & 'de'~ist
,i.2902 liazelwood'Road in r.~sidential or make arran~le.ments to
55/85 7-29-85 Kevin Norwood, 2521 Wilshire .... Tenants in R-I District Have tenants vacate
· Blvd. · ............ premises by 8-,I-85
56/85 7-30-85' Richard Haley, 4574 Denbigh Remodel lng without 5 days to get permit
ROadR. Pe rmi t
157/85 7-31--85 Jon . Nelson, 5429 Bartlett Oversized R.E. slain Reduce sign size .to 5 sq
58/85 7-31-85 Pi/pi:Gayle J. Schuffenhauer Exc. Hill without perm't I0 days to come & shov~
6350 Rambler-Lane, Piound 6350 Rambler plan to repair/retainhl
David. k. Spilseth, 3233 Casco Accumulation of debris 15-days to correct
8-6-85
· Circle, Wayzata 55391 at 4657 Manchester Rd. ~__
. cc: Tenant, 4657 Manchester _____.._.. ---
-'~ ~'~ Debra Pi. ~~ Accumulation of debris 30 days to correct
Brighton Blvd.. ... ..
-61/85 8-12-85 Ambrose Schug ~; Katherine A. Encroaching garage in 180 days to remove; 15
Knott, 5222 Phelps Road deteriorating condition days to get demo permi
Katherine A. Knott, Same address
8-1'6-85 Zeb Hanson, 2401 Chateau Ln. Accumulation of materia s rrect
.debri. s & inoperable Veh - '
....... cle~ 'etc;
-'-'~:T~:~'~ Expired Temp.Cert. of 0:c./5 day to arrange rein
I 6/4/85 8-16-85 Hussman Investment,31/40 liar- " ~' " fo
bor. Lane, Mpls. 55441.6231 Deerwood Drive . 5 day to arran~le "
I 65/85 8-29-85 Eric Bergland, 5138 Hanover 4972 Northern Rd. 15 days to correct
cc_: R. H~m|noer. 4cj72 North~;rn Correction of dec~
work
PAGE# I 1,3
2
~IBER DATE ADDRESSED ' ' ' SUBJECT
....... ~ ~.uetPL lANCE DATE
]/85 /4-25'-85 Cur. tis A. Pearson ~/est Sub Properties - Check on filing of Agree.
cc: Jori E lam '
Halstead Heights C6635 & if not recorded,proceed
Bartlett Blvd.-cabin) With condemnation
~/85 4-25'85 Hr. & Hrs. Dan S. egner, 2260 :4578 Denbigh I~oad ' 30 days to sod/see¢'
Bayview.Place,..~/ayzata..55391 Dirt washing dn. hrll construct retaining ,al1;
................. unto nei~lhbors* propert, ": '
-3/85 q-29-1~5 Am. Legion Post ;1~6, KOOC. ]0 days for haybales
Shanley, Commander, 2333 14il- temporary signage
shire Blvd.,. Hound
~.4/85' 5-3-85 Lo Shun..Lee,..7301. Lanham Ln. '21-~1 Basswood Lane 30 days to provide du p~_~-,
.EdTna; 'HN. '55/435 .... . -' · ster with screening'A:i~,t~.'
25/8.5 5-3-85 H/H james R-,..Hagar,~lqOOq 2139 Basswood 'Lane 30'days. to provid~ dd~
Chestnut Dr....,.#..3, .Eden' ster with
· Prairie,; 'HN; '5534~' ' ' scree
26/85 5-9-85 Kenneth F..Jeurlssen,, ~.r:t49...'Accumulation of debris 7 days to remove/c'or'rect
Bedford'Road ............... ,"~0ch'as'tree h~ouse, etc. violation
~?/85 5-10-85 "Curt Pearson, IlO0 First Bk. Htka. Hobil Home Park at: ' '
Place ~/est, Hpls. 55402 6635 Bartlett Blvd.
......... Sent 'various letters ant forms to City Atto.rney
28/85 5-16-~J5 Jerry S. Pehrson, 5001 Crest.- Accumulation of debris 15. da,, t~l to correct ' -
view Road, Hound +'unlicensed' 'Tl'ailer ;O~;:___,_~
!~/85 5-16-85 Clark Peters, 21/46 Noble Ln. Accumulation of debris 's to remove/c~orrect
,
~0/85 5-16-85 Hr. Dayton Vi ]liamson, 2012 iAccumulation of debris 30 days to remove/correct
Villa Lane + Junk vehic]es
~]/85 5-'17-85 Thompson Plbg. Co., 12201 2390 Avon Drive IO days to submit app.
Hinnetonka Blvd., Htka..55343 No boiler permit for approval
12/85 5-20L85 Donald Olsen,..771..SanDiego 6385 Bartlett Blvd. 30 days to remove c~
Road; ee~kley~ 'CA'94707' ' 'PlO 23-1.17-2/4 32 0037 + neighbors beinj~ not~fie~d
'3/85 5-2/4-85 Judith Harshik, 2066 Commerce Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove
4/85 5-31-85 John Babler, Jr., 2235 Lang- Operating Auto/Body 60 .days to cease .& _.~
don Lane . Repair in accessory bid I. desist.
35/85 6-4-85 T'homas V. E isler,.. 286'1. Phea'- Debris a'~' 'qTqb RichmOnd · days to~remove/~orre~
sant Ci rcle .&. Occupant, ../47.a~ ..Road
Richmond Rd;" ' "* ' ' '.' ". .....
~'6/85 6-4-8~' Richard Kryck, 59§6..Sunset RC...Debris & unli. cen'~'ed. /~,30 'days to remove &
........ vehicles'* · correct
37/85 6-4-&:~ Steven Shannon,SI62 Emerald Removal of encroachment Res. exp. I yr. from
..~..: .................. of pt. of acc. bldg. 7-24-8~
...................... Per 'Res. 84-114 '---
38/85 6-q-85 Vincent Forsman, 4857 Island Accumulation of _debris ~0 days to'"remove/correE
View Drive ...... & inoperable/unlicensed
................. vehicles
~9/85 6-6-85 Aaron Appelqulst & Hary Trailer being lived in' 15 days to remove '
Pacholke,. 2624 ~/estedge Blvd. on..R-1 Property ,
~0/85 6-14-M5 Gordo. ~'u,F, ;~61u ~1 iaar¢ nd. Incomplete Information. Submit by 6~?,-85 --
: submitted for variance ~~,-'~ -~ ,
on structural, al teratlo ~s fy
ql/1~5 6-14-1~5 Kevin Norwood, 2521 ~/iis'hire Zoning Amendment Appl. Have until 6-19-85 to
Blvd. (Accessory Apt.) request refund or r 'ncll
will be asked to h~ ~ PH
Harvin D. 14olte._q~j.f :~ne~ ~ncl ~/4j ~v~ ic/nurs[ Lane Remove ~tems you w~Sn t~-
42/~5' 6-14'-~5 Ave., Hpls. 55406 ..... i 1..Pr. op,to..be..clean up by keep by 6-21-85
· '. ........ l'court 'orde~ '. ......... ~
43/85' 6-]4-85 R & R ~rgDe'~'ties, ~ RUss Fa]-I 2400 Commerce Blvd. ;" 'C'or'rect ~o days
ness, o/UO Lynwood B]vd. · ! Body work & car repair
no~ cars,
· , SUBJECT COMPLIANCE DATE_~..~
~BER DATE ADDRESSED '
~ Alexander H01zer, H01zer Plbg Plbg. Registration
& Heating, Navarre, MN. 55392' returned ~
:/85 1-25-85 Ken Nelson, 2620 Tyrone Lane Doing auto repair in Sent Home 0cc. Ord.
accessory bldg. _.---
)/'7~ 1-25-~ ~,'a~-. Accumu at,on of ~ebri~ to correct
veh. incl. coml. dum~ ...... .
truck parked in res.
~/85 1-25-85 B.J.Malcheski, 5§2-01Bartlett 5862 Bartlett has 30 days to correct
Blvd.'; Mound, MN. accum, of debris,
veh. & deteriorated b~nv~ day~,pa remove
barn needs removal l!
5/8~. 1-25-85 ~on Konek, 5120 Edgewater Dr, Accumulation of debris 30 days to correct
.cc: ..(Owner) Cur~i..s..E...dohnsor ..& garbage; unlicensed
p,O;BOx'246;S'rl_~Pk'5538q trailers .....
~ 2-8-85 Alan Hofstadter, 5139 Woodlan, Compliance with Codes By after spring clean
Road ..... up in May
7/85 2-8-85 M/M Mike Grove, 460~.Bedford Bidg.Permits expired compiete in.30 days &
Road uncompleted items arrange re-lnsp. 3-29-~.
665/20
8/85 2-8-85 Walter Thomas,2400 Dupont S. Agreement ~e~. ~,~y .
Mpls., MN. 55405 & West Suburban Prop.
' to remove struc. 7-1-~5
~/85 ' 2-27-85 Tim White, P.O. Box 194, 2137 Centerview Lane 5 da~s to arrange to
Excelsior, MN. 55331 Bldg. without permit; be put on C.C. agenda
....... '.. Needs'variance for resolve variance reques'
......................... What he's started
2-27-85 H/H Heyers,2620 Commerce Filing amended cond. Fileb~ 3-2p-iL5
Blvd.. ........ use permit .at 2620 c~O.i.~
............................. C0n~nerce
?-28-8~--- Curt Pearson Atty.Ardery's letter &
Agreement bet. City &
West Sub. Prop. on Cabi~
on Trailer Pk. propert)
12/85 3-21-85 Robert Flemal, 1415 Westwood Wire fence not to code 5 days to remove fence
Drive, Minnetrista 55364 & leaning. . -
3/85 4/1/85 M.L. Jackson .... Complaint: Debris in Debris:'~/1/~
I 5048 Edgewater Dr. his yard; unlicensed, Cars: 5/1/85
Mound..MN .55J64 : inoperable cars;Deter- Shed:. 6/1/~5 .~--
~ - .... .-'" iorati~ --.~
11'~85 4/4/8'---~ Frank Buysse.i 2009 & 2017 Commerce 30' days
· 35~ ,Ivy Place Wayzata Bi_vd. dumpster encl. . .....
Orville Silseth ' comply with obtaining 3
115/ 4/4/85 ~107 Arnvle lane nermitR ' -
16/85 4-9-85 Ervin S~'Brethorst, P.O.Box 2140 Hickory Lane 30 days.
I 58, Spring Park, MN. 55384 Accumulation of debris,
.-. LP tanks & inoperable
snowmobiles
17/85 .: 4-9-85 Michael Mittelstaedt, 214~ Accumulation of debr's 30 days
Belmont vehicles & LP tanks,
~arba~e cans/no covers
18/85 4-10-85 Don D. Mcllree' Box 398, St. Tenant in Apt. 2 at 5 days to have tenant
Bonifacius, MN,"55375 2152 Belmont Ln. has remove.
· stuffed sofas & chairs
......................... in dumpster area - now
I .......................... at'2153 Basswood
19/85 4-17-85 M/M Neii Schoenhofer, 6116 Accumulation of debris '30 days to cor'rect
Bartlett Blvd. garbage cans & vehicle::
I
I--~0/85 A-~q-RR ! Clarence Dewanz, 1742 Heron Accumulation of debris 30 days to correct
I
I ! no garbage cans & junk e~, u'-~. :. r' ~'~ '
I __
IUHBER DATE ADDRESSED ~ Page 14'
..... bUUJECT COHPLIANCE DATE
~ 1-5~ Dennis C. Otteson, Ottes~ Items on Temp. Cert.
Homes', 27200 W. 6~nd St., .dated..3-30-83 not..com-
Exc. HN. 55331 Cert.Mail pleted, ..............
~ 1--'~-t~--House of Moy~ ~55~ Shorel~ne~
.... equi. rements for.proposec
Blvd., Mrs. Mo~, Mound "remodelingof'restaUrant
;~ 1-9-84 Dennis Oas, Jude Candy & Sprinkler System super- Get permits by 2-15--~
Tobacco Co., 3005 N. Niagara vised by remote station; and complete Work within
Lane, Plymouth 55441 needs revisions; need 180 days.
cc: Gerald E. Smith, S-O-S exits from basement area;.
Printing, Westonka Sch. of. need air supply (furnaces
'Dance S F.D. & exhaust ventilation In
rest rooms, etc.
/84 1-11-84 Solar Resources Internatlona' Installation of solar 10 days to obtain permits
~ttn: Dave Bromley, 7603 Bmh equipment without permit~
.ake Rd., Edina, MN 55435 in City
'-/~r~---~~odney E~ Duklet, 10000 3rd Expired Bldg. Permit 15 days to renew or
~ve. S., Bloomington'55420 '83~6206
arrange for final insp.'~
1/84 1-26-84 Greg Hoseth, 1583 Gull Lane Remodeling without permit 5 days to comply/correc~
Wood burning appllance not etc.
installed in proper manner.
Need re-inspection of smo(e
_____ alarm ..~
)---~'4'---~Walter Graham, Jr., 4520 No permit or insp. of Proceed immediately to
Denbigh Rd. existing bldg. drains obtain permit S insp. of
cc: Da]e Carlson Excavatin. connected to new system connections made at the
·
Plb9. ~nsp., interior of bld
)/84 2-3-84 Alvin G. Quist, 4909 I.V. Accumulation of debris & 30 days to remove and
Drive vehicles on vacant lot on correct.
Wilshire(24-117-24 14 0051
1/84 2-6-84 Richard Ash, 3068 Brighton Advertising sign in R-3 30 days to remove &
Blvd. & unlicensed cars, etc. correct
-- on premises
~ 2-6-84 Frank Buysse, 3545 Ivy Pl. Discussion on apt. com- Comp lance dates -
Wayzata 55391 plexes at 2009 & 2017 various to 6-15-84
Commerce Blvd.
3/84 2-10-84 James C. Hendrlcks, 3006 Expired Bldg. Permit 5957 15 days to renew or
Westedge Blvd. arrange for final inst.
'i~/8~ 2-10-8q Edvardo Oabrowski, 2545 Expired Bldg. Permit 6157 .15 days to renew or -
Pilgrim Lane N., Mpls.
55441 arrange for final insp.
15/8~ 2-16-84 Randy Saba, 2348 Commerce Filling lot without permit Permit to be obtained &
.......... '.' .'..' .' . grading plan to be sub-
mitted.
.[.6/8~, 2-16-84. Vic Carlson & Sons, 2246 Fllling & grading lot 10 days to submit plan
Edgewater'Ave~,'MPls''55421; 'without permit obtain permit.
i7/84 2-17-84 Desyl Peterson Memo requesting warning (~ ~//~.~-/oC,~7/ -
notice be sent for clean- '
............. up'of'property 2301 Falrv ew Lane
i'8/8q 2-28-84 J.p. Oberman, 3130 West- Public nuisance - dog 5 days from receipt of -
edge..BlYd .......................... kennel & accumulation letter to clean yard, etc
................. of.feces..
9/84 3-5-84 Rainier Company,12~50 Way- Apt. Bldg. lnspection 30 days to correct -
zata Blvd. # 300, Mpls. 5000,501465026 Shoreline
MN. 55343 ' "
0/84 3-12-8q John R. Drews, 2337 Wi1- Conditional use for i15 days to comply with -
shire Blvd. Coml. Rec. Facility Item 7 (Stairway removal
1/S4~-l~-R& n .... ~ o ....... ~.~,., .... i .......
rson, 4344 IDS 2925 Holt Lane - Fritz
Johnson -
· PAGE 15
~BER DATE ' "ADDRESSED "SUBJECT COMPLIANCE DATE .
2/84 3-15-84 Robert B-lix, 5028 Woodrldge Siding house without ] .10 days to get permit
Road permit
3/84 3-15-~q Ouane Skochenski, Ouane's wasm oil Heater I~ days to remove
Phililps "66" Service, 2603 unapproved
Commerce Blvd'. .__.
3-22-84 Curt-is L. Johnson,P.O.Box 24~ Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove
Spring Park, MN. 55384 etc. at 5120 Edgewater -comply
cc: Tenant at 5120 E.d~ewater Drive
5/8q 3-2~8-84 Owners-Multi.pie Residences Multiple Residence July 1, 1984 compliance
~'Q See Apt. Owners file Units Precollection date·
Storage
6/84 3-29-84 Roger Rager, 1645 Gull Lane Three P~ints Tavern 4-15-84' to bring in info.
MOund ~ 5098 Three Points Blvd on the proposed improve-
' n~nts, etc.
:7/84 3-30-84 Desyl Peterson 3OI5 Drury Lane, M/M Be~
Oeterin~ uncompleted pr.>ject
~8/84 4-3-~q Shields Printing Co. Needs Cond. Use for Get app. in before 5-1-~
2271 Commerce Blvd. Attn. M~r.Print Shop' in B-1
~5/8q ~-3~84 Frana & Sons, Inc. Final bn Bldg. Permit~l~ ~~..
cc: ~d Kodet, Spaulding .Engr. 6383 for 2461 Commerce
& John Rocheford
30/84 4-5-84 Desyl Peterson Abandoned/uncompleted
.. Permi. t 5592..for 5881-
'- BeaChwoOd'ROad .......
3-~"Z~q~Wm. R. Harrison, 7~Halsteac Accumulation of debris 30 days to clean up
Av., Mound & unllcensed boat & ...'""
"~ cc: Vera Mack trailer
4-~-84 M/M Marv. in Smith, 5467 3 Pts Bldg. without permit 5 days to get permit'
·
'32/b~ Blvd. '
33/84 4-5-84 Teri Homes, 1510 Stoughton Av. Lots 11 & 12,Blk. 27, 30 days to correct
Chaska, MN 55318 5eton(27XX Tyrone Lane)
Scc: Imker Hill undercut
34/84 4-12-84 M/M Richard Baanrud, 3135 Ayr Reminder 6-1-84 date
Lane,'Mound, MN. 55364 for compliance coming P
35/84 4-12-84 M/M Michael Gray, 4852 Glas- Remodeling without pen,it 5 days to get perml
gow Rd
I36/84 4-12-84 M/M Donald Gilmore, 4416 Lam- Reminder 6-1-84 date i~
berton Road coming up for compliance on
~ ~ unlicensed/inoperable ~eh. '
38/84 4-1'3-~4 Gladys..~ohnson,.-301-8 tsland ..... ..Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove/corre
Vie~:Drive, Mound's55364 ....... Unllcensed snowmobile
37/84 4-13-84 M/M Burr Linqulst, 4875 Edge- Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove/corr~
ware r..Dr lye ........................... un 1 i censed/i noperab 1 e
·
I ' " . ....................... trailers
35/84 4-13-84 M/M Tom Roden, 3006 l.V.Drive Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove/corr,
............................. &.unlicensed/inoperable
'VehiCles .
1 ~4-13-84 James Willer, Mgr., V.F.W. Viol. of storage & sale 30 days to remove/corr~
2544 Commerce Blvd., Mound of wood on lot next to
VFW; also debris accum.'
--4~~ John Ericson, 1 20 Shadywood Landlocked parcel PID
Rd., Wayzata 553~1 23-117-24 23 0007 to be
~ combined~With One frontin~ on Westedge
42/84 ,4-17-84 =Rlchard..DeWitt, 4516 Bedford Violation Chap.70 of UB;ion
Rd./scc:-David Griffin drainage of water &
problems.
: , PAGE
HBER DATE ..... ADDRESSED ' ' SUBJECT' '
~~ .bUffiFLIAN~E DATE
q3/84 4-23-84 H/H Paul Villette, 1720 Avoce, Accumulation of debrisJ '7 days to correct
· Lane ·
--2~"/~'J~7'~ M M Dave oman, ateau $ unlicensed trailer
Ln. cc:.Harold D. Albrecht, ~~move
2300 Chateau ~n.
--~~~ E. Johnson, ~ Accumula~ 30 days to remove
Ave. S., St. Louis Pk. 55426 in fire lane
& Betty E. Sather~ 3090 N.
__________ Shore Dr., Wayzata, MN. 55391
~ 5-11-84 Dennis Heckes, 322~' Tuxedo ~a-~get ~
Blvd. nstalllng fence w~th
-1~ 5-~- M M Leo M. T ibodeau, 59 1 no permit incorrectly also fence to be corrected
] 841 Hillcrest'ed; Hound Accumu atlon o debr,s 30 days to remove-c0-rLLLY
48/8~ 5-1 - James E. Viller, P.O. Box 11 Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove/cor,~ct
Mound (4955'.Donald Drive)
~9/8~ 5-1~-84 Guardian of Esther E. Jacobs Accumulation of debris .30 days to remove/correct
5465 Bartlett BlVd. unlicensed vehicle, etc
50/84 5~-84 E..L. Longley, P.O. 223, Moun( Accumulation of debris 60 days to comply
. (5227 Phelps Rd.)
51/84 5-17-8~ M/M Leon'A. Heller, 7525. Accumulation of debris 30 days to clean up
Harol~ Ave..,' Golden Val. ley 55,.27
52/84 5-17-84 Donald O. Riis, 1625 Eagle Ln Accum. of debris & 30 days to remove/correct
Junk Cars
53/84 5-17-84 ~alter Guthrie, 2142 Belmont Zoning violation of Cease work on vehicles
Lane'Apt;'#'3, Mound '
home occ.- doing auto repair .
5-~~ Dean Hunter, ~ AC.~um. o cle~i~ .... 30 d'~'--~"~ys to ~emov~
55--~~ v~n . u~st., san Inoperable/unlicensed c~rs
'' ~ View Drive Reminder to ~emove itens per 2-3-84 letter
PID 24-117-24 14 0051
(Lot on ~ilshi're) Date a reed upon
~ 5-18-84 M/H Dean Hunter, 5043 Tuxedo Accumulation of debris 30 days to~
& unlicensed/inoperable
aut~
57/84 5-24-84 Chester Stuteville, 4878 Unauthorized constructic~ 10 Days
Edge~a.ter..D~.'i ye ..... '
5-~'-~ Desyl Peterson 1 ~Teri H----~omes re: 27XX Tyr(~ne Refarred t'~o City Arty
2 Gladys Johnson, 3018 I. I.Dr. for warning notice of
- 3 Richard Janke, 5909 Gler~wOod pending prosecution
................. re:' Accum.. of debris, el:c.
59/84 6-12-84 Ron Gehring, 3215 Cha*rles Ln. Recorded covenants,cond 15 'days to file with City
S restrictions filed on Clerk
.... ' ..... · twinhomes-~737&4743 Dor~hester~.~.~L~_-L~ ~c.
" 2851,2857,286362869 Tuxedo ~
60/84 6-12-84 Arnold Heiserich,1801 Quebec Fence installed withou 10 days to get permit &
Ay., Golden Valley, 55427. permit, building wire then call for final insp.
/ ?~ O-~r~h~ , not permitted material when fence corrected.
,1/84 6-13~84 M/M Lon D. Hol 1584 Finct Accumulation of Debris 15 days to correct & get
g No 9arbage cans 9arbage containers
i2/84 6-13-84.. Mrs .... Geo...Cole,.2162 Center- Adverlsing Home Occ. 5 days to remove sign
· .. vle~ Lane. - ........... with sign
i3/8q 6-1q-~q Dr. Robert Griffith, Box lq7 '1708 Avocet Lane, adding 10 days to ge'
Vatertown, MN. 55388
enclosed porch no pern'it permit ...
~4/84 6-14-84 M/M Daniel Christianson, 4724 Grading yard/no frost 30 days to correct
iHanover Road C..~. ' protection east wall ~,'
~5/84 6-15-84 Paul vogt, P.O.Box 64, Long Accumulation of debris 30 days to correct
Lake, MN. 55356 unlicensed vehicles,et,:.
6/~4 6-15-84 William Petron & Sally Woodro~ Accumulation o~ d~hri~ ~ ~ .... +
ys correct
~,.~ 6749 Cypress Dr., Central Point 2434 Commerce Blvd. /
~BER DATE .... i"ADDRESSED '' SUBJECT ' " COHPL'IANCE DATE
~7/84 $-15-84 Kenneth Ketchum/Betty Ketchuff 166~ Finch Lane J :30 day to correct'-'
' 5665 Lyn.wood.Bl-vd.-Apt;- 306 · Accum'. 'of' debris S
I~I~ inoperable sn0wmobile
8/8 6-15-84 M/M..John Eyres, 2335 Inde- 4713 Wi lshire Blvd. 15 days to correct.
~endence Rd., Maple Plaln 5535~) Debris accumulation ~.
no garbage cans
I9/84 6-15-84 Nicholas Espi~ritu, 1638 Eagle Bldg. remodeling withcut I0 days to get permit
.......... permi t · (bay-wi ndow)
r0/84 6.19_84 Jacci Segner, '2260 Bayvlew.' Expired Demolition Pert it 5 days 'to know in-
Place, Wayzata,'HN. ~5391 62h8 on garage on Lot 1 tentions on matter ~
· B]k. 3, Avalon
I1/84 6-21-84 .Dean. LaForest,..4920 W'i. lshire -Blue.Capri on lot acros: . 10 days, to remove
........................ st; 'un1 icensed/inoperable' .xt~t.,,,~"~.
I ~T' ~ T_honLas D. ,Green, ~ 1584 Finch Lane, Accumu- 15 days to correct
; ~ '7-1~-?¥ ~oo~'~' lation of debris
73 4 6-27-84 Susan Lowe, 50!4 Shoreline Inspection of apt. veri':y Correct and improve
Blvd., Apt. 2 water standing on carpe & drainage on site by
sheetrock wet owner, Rainier Corp.~
74/84 .7/6/8q Hichael Banecki bldg. Without permit.
4760 Bedford Road debris, wetland filling 30 days
wiring vlol.ation 10 days to apply
75/84 7/6/84 New Horizon Day' Care
sign permit' ..30 days to complete
2900 High]and Blvd.
76/84 7-10-84 DoUg]as H0odie~ 4916 Edgewatel Remove sheetrock for Aug. 1, 1984 to comply
Drive framing/insulation insp
cc: Curt. Hagfors, 4360 6t.h submit energy cal.; pro~ide
Ay. N., Long Lake 55356 access & ventilation to
· . '" '-: ....... basement; obtain elec.p~;rmlt
I 77/'e~ 7/10/84 Curt Pearson, City Atty. Investigative report
.... on. 2631 Commerce Blvd.
'-78/84 7/11/~q Veterans Admin. Guarantee 5656 Bartlett Blvd; L5 days to let me know
Division, Federal Bldg., Attn House in disrepair intention to correct
Dennis Johnson, Fort Snelling deficiencies
79/84 7-11-84 Father &'Son Cons:ruction, 395a John C.ampbell Residence 30 days~.to cqrrect
28th Ave. S., Mpls, MN. 55406 Leaking roof, etc. ~.~1~, ~.~..~~
Attn: Scott Torbo cc: Campbel s, 5341 Baywood Shores O'.
I 80/84 7-13-84 ,.R. oger A. & Betty J. Drews,5646 50~ Three. Points Blvd. Debris - I:>-'oays
"W 'Hearn Glendale Ariz.85306 Accum. of debris & gas tank removal - 30 days
60 days to remove
I81/8/4 7-13-84 Hrs. George Levy, .3216..Drew Av. 2624 Westedge Blvd.
. N., MR1s.,'MN''55422 ....... Accum. of debris & vehi,',le~
82/84 7-17-84 Brigitte, Inc., 426 Lake St.-, .... 4[~91 ..Edgewater Drive 30 days to remove
Excelsioi', MN. 55331 Accumulation'of'debriS ......
-.83/84 7-17-84 Judy Kvalsten, 5125 Windsor Rd'. Swimming pool over 2 ft: 5 days to. reduce water
deep unf, enced depth or apply for var
I 84/84 7-17-84 garren B. Davidson/Janice Vetsc~ 4625 Lakeside Lane 30 days 1~o remove/corr
301 5. Pine~ Waconia~ MN. 55384 Accumulation of debris
85/84 7-17-84 Lawrence L. Vance M/M, 3017 Accumulatlon of car 30 days to remove/corr
Brighton Blvd. parts, debris &.inoper-
' 'able&unllcensed cars ......
8i 7-17-84 Maurice Johnson, 6021 Chestnut reroofing & siding 10 days'to obtain/
Rd. 'house - no permit
I 87/84 7-16-84 M/M Brian .Follese,..5182 W,. .... 1.743 Wildhurst Lane 10 days to fence~
Broadway ................. Unfenced excavation 30 days to level
~Ot,-e
I 88/84 7-1~-~4 Norton G. Tucker, 35~.Hugo-.St .. 1.720..Finch..Lane . .. 15 days to arrange re-
Fridley 55432 cc:Thomas 'Leuchl enberg inspec'tlon
I 89/84, 8-9-84 John ~/hitman, bU28 Enchant'ed Fd.' Ken_tel d?c_ks in ~,~'~/
~,~_ ~ ..... t, , - .(/ .... resldential.
ER DATE'"*"ADDRESSED. SUBJECT , COHPL'IANCE DATE ,o
~/84 8-20-84 David W. & Margaret Griffin Garage not completed ] ~30 days to complete. ~
~' ~.~ ~, , . .
.... , .... . '- . ..:- · ....... - -. ..... · . : arrange re-inspection.
/~q ~-20-~q Patcicia ROse, 6000 Aspen Rd. Rentjn9 port.ion of dw9. 10 days to provide insp.~
:/84 8-20-84 Gertrude Shellum, 4613 Tuxedo " " " 1.0 days to provide insp.~
-~q .9-1u-uq Jon R. Nelson,' 5429 Barttett Rental property not
Blvd, . being Fented; .struc.'
changes required, to
...... discontinue'as"multi?'e dwg.(4 unit bldg.)
4-84 9-19-~q Patricia Jean Swift, 1867 E. 1559 Bluebird Lane I0 days to correct and
38th St., MPLS., MN. 55406 secure' fr~m uncontrolled~-'
Cert. Mal access
5/84 9-25~84 Dave Spilseth, 3233 Casco Accumulation of debris 15 days'to remove end/or
· Cir~le~'Wayzata,.MN. 55391 'at'4657 Manchester Rd. ~orrect
~6/84 9-25-84 Gawel & Knaeble Contractors, Expired Bldg. Permit 15 days to.get flnal.
Inc., 2422 Washington St.N,.E, 302'1Devo~ Lane renew permit
Mpls'., MN;~55~18 ........... " .....
7?84 9-25-84 James Lassek',. 2431Wilshire Home occ. 23.302(54)~& -
Blvd; ..... · Derelict autos 46.44.
18/84 9-25-84 Rev. & Mrs. C. Lee'Huff ' Home occ.& derelict"&
· 2902 Hazelwood Road unlicensed motor vehicles .~"
19/84 9-28-8~ Kenneth E..Jeurissen, ~949 Accum. of debris, etc./~ 3~ days ~.qorr~e. ct
Bedford., Road ' ' ~1'~C~_.'. ~f~/~; '
)0/84 '!0-4-84 Clifford Swank, 1440 Halgren Accum. of ~'ebrls.& Junk ~ ~30 days'to correct
· . Rd.., Maple Plain, MN. 55359. .cars.on vacant lot behlrld"
' cc': Dan $icheneder, 1733 Sh°'ewood Lane 1743 S'horewcod Ln.
~1/84 10-9-84 Louis R. King, 587'5 Bartlett Bldg. Permit 6420 expired: '15 days to get permit
Blvd., Mound screened porch not start,d '~
02/84 10-10-84 Richard Mccurdy, 5330 Three Roofing without permit IU ~ays to get permit
Points Blvd.
103/8! 10-!0-84 'J. E. Foote, 5958 Hawthorne Rd Installing fence with 15 day~oget
out permit ~(l:- ~w:u~ ~.-
104/8z 10-10-84 Barbara Timmons, 5011Rosedale Bldg. Permit expired;. 15 dayS to correct.&
Road no final cal~ed.for call for final
& correct chimney height
105/8! 10-11-84 Wm. "Frenchy" Dampier, 4853 Remodeling without per- . 10 days'to get permit
Island V'iew Dr. mit/cease S desist work O~0-~-~'.L~.
106/8~ 10-12-84 Michael J. Byrne,'V.Pres.., Letter of Credit 100984 CorrectV&)return.
State Bank of Long Lake, Long Lost Lake Addn.
Lake, MN. 55356 ........ Account of'Jellico
107/8~!0-16-~q M~.&Mrs. Matt L. Ruppert, gxpirea ulag.rermit ~ -
4448 Manchester Rd. Need Final Htg..Insp. ~-0~*,~~
[OS/Sz 10-19-84 Allen Shay., 5348..Lynwood..BlYd ..Gas.piping for pool T? days to 9Uet ~ermit
........ ' .............. heater ~'no'permit~ .
109/8~ 10-26-84 Richard &.Barbara Ash, 3068 Accum. of debris 30 days to correct
Bri~ht~n Blvd. .. ,._
.i.10/~4'10-29-8~ Jane Foote, 5958 Hawthorne Re. Permit 6740 to erect .:
fence.& tie into , ..
neighbor's'fence- :... ~.-
111/1~4 10-30-8~ Paul A. Henry, 5056 Sulgrove Expired Bldg. Pe'~mits ~Complete in 30 days or
Road #4668 ᢬ ....... 9et'hew'permit for work
112/~4 10-30-84: Scott Berglund, 4556 I.V.Dr. Expired Bldg. Permit Remove sheetrock for
new owner framln9 insp. in 10 days_
113/~4 11-1-84 David Ziskln, 4801..l.V.Dri. ve. 3068 Brighton Blvd. '5 days ~o clAan up
............... Accumulation of debris
114/84 11-1-8~ Richard Heggemeyer,220 W. 9~t~ Dir~ &-debris in st. 5 days to clean street
St., Bloomi. ngton. 55420 Beachw~od Rd. by Lang. ~r City wil~>.do & bill
.... don View Subd. -
115/84 ll-5-84LRoger Hill, 6300 Linden Lane Bidg. Permits 6326,5443,
_ _ ' & 6013 I 30 days to complete or
get new permit
BER DATE .... ADDRESSED ' SLBJECT COMPLIANCE DATE
6/84 !1-t6-84 Donald R. Phillips, 3021Hig~- Reroof~ng without J ~10 days to get permit
I. land Blyd; per.mit.
17/84 ll-g'r-§4 Crane Bodine, 6142 Attic Way Accumulation of debris I0 days to remove or
~'~ I%~,.,j~b Edlna, MN. 55436 ' at 5025 Wren Rd. correct
18/~.~ 11~2~-64 Letters to: Lo Shun Lee 2131 Basswood Lane-re:- dumpsters
Phillip LittlefielJ 21q2 Belmont Lane
Don McElree 2152 BElmont '~~
James O'Connell 2145 Basswood ",,,-
James Hagar '- 213~ Basswood "~
Danny Peterson 2161 Basswood ,,
cc: Blackowiak' & Son
12-3-~q Richard E. Johnson, ~255 Semi-trailers parked 10 days tfl5 call to work
r 1~/84 Indian Hills Rd.,..Maple.-Plai~, on his off of out time frame
prop.
agreeable
5535~ .~ ............... Marion & Auditor's Rd. to remove
I 20/84 12-11-84 James Kruse, 2830 Pine Road' Expired..bldg..Pe~mit ......... '.5-.days to sched, tinal
No'final'inspection ........
121/84 12-11-84 (evin F. McKeever, 262~ Sette Expired Bldg. Permit 15 days to get permit
Clrcle Install Stove & Chimmy and arrange progress
· without .permit inspection.
1 ~22/84 12-21-84 Roger.Woodruff, 4870 Edgewater Accumulation of debris 30 days to remove
)r. ...... + garbage containers
123/84 12-21-84 Steven'Darling, q874 Edge~ater Accumulation of debris 5 days
+ coyer for. garbage -.
. containers
124/84 ~2-21-84 Charles Stuteville, 4878 Edge ACcumulation, misc. 30 days to Correct
water Drive· + need garbage
, 125~ Lq 12-24-84 Nell Froeming, 4866 Edgewater Temp. pi as tic lean-to Correct by spring of 85
I_.1
1~6~ ' Provldegarba e cans
L
I:~ John W. Sima~, ~ Ma~c~' Accumulation o~ aeor~s ---~c~
Rd. at 4630; no garbage ca~s
- cc: Owner, Gary 01son, 5721
23rd Av,S.; Mp~s,'55417
127/84 12-27-84 Alan Hofstadler, 513~ Woodlard Accumulation of debt's 30 d~ys. to correFt ,
~ Road no garbage containers & b~e~'~'
tree house not allowed ~_~Z/gi~..C-
~- inoperable/unlicensed ~oat
128/84 12-27-84 Charles W. Childs, ~425 Rad- Accumulation of debris 15 da~s to correct
nor Rd., Mound inoperable/unlicensed ~~~./
van truck, no cover on
garbage containers
12~/84 12-27-84 Wm. Bull, 1616 Finch Lane Accumulation of debris ~0 days to correct_
OLD ORDINANCE
CITY OF HOUND
Recreation Equipment - Play apparatus such as swing sets.and slides,
sandboxes, poles for nets, unoccupied boats and trailers not exceeding
L~venty feet In length, picnic tables, lawn chairs, barbecue stands, and
..similar equ. lpment br structures but not !ncludlng tree houses, swimming
pools, play houses exceeding ~venty-five square feet of floor area, or
sheds utl!lzed for storage of equipment.
23.702
Exterior Storage_
In residential distrlcts,~all materials and equipment shall be stored
within a building or fully screened so as not to be visible from adjoining
properties, except for the following: laundry drying and're.cr, eatlonal
equipment, construction an~).'landscaping'materials and equipment c~.'rrenl:ly
(within a period of thlr~y-six {36) hours) being used on.'the, pr,e/~lses~
off-street, parking of licensed and operative passenger automobites and~..:-.-'
pick-up trucks. Boats and 'unoccupied trailers are permlsslble if stored
in the rear yard more than ten (10) feet from the property line. Existing
uses shall corn. ply with this provision within twel.ve (12) months following
enactme'n: of this Ordinance.
In al!' districts, the C
extermor storage if it iTM may require a Conditional Use .Permit for any
s demonstrated that such storage ~s a hazard to
the publlc health, safety, convenience, morals, or has'a depreciating
effect upon nearby property values, or impairs scenic views, or con-
stitutes threat to living amenities.
ORDINANCE RO. ~88
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 23 OF THE CITY
CODE, SECTION 23.301 (92) DEFINITION OF
RECREATION EQUIPHENT AND SECTION 23.?02 RELATING
EXTEKIOK ~TOKAGE
TO
THE CITY OF HOUND DOES ORDAIN=
Section 23.301 (92), relating to the definition of
.R.eoreation Equipment" is amended to read as follows:
(92)
Recreation Equipment- Play apparatus such as swinf
sets and slides, sandboxes, poles for nets, picnic
tables, lawn chairs, barbecue stands, and similar
equipment or structures but not including tree houses,
swimming pools,, play houses exceeding twenty-five
square feet of floor area, or sheds utilized for
storage of equipment. Recreation equipment shall also
include recreation vehi=les not exceeding thirty (30)
feet in length lnoluding bu~ no~ limited to boats~ boa~
travel trailers and self-oon~ained motor
trailers,
homes.
Section 23.702, Exterior Storage, 'is amended to rear as
follows:
Exterior Storage
In residential
equipment shall
23:702
districts, all materials and
be stored within a buildin~ or
fully' screened so as not to be visible rom
adjoining properties, except for the following:
laundry drying and recreational equipment,
see definition ¢q2), construction and landscaping
materials and equipment currently (within a 'period
of thirty-six (36) hours) being used on the
premises, off-street parking of licensed and
operative passenger automobiles and pick-up trucks.
Storage of recreational vehicles including but not
limited to boats, boat trailers, travel trailers
and self-contained motor homes is permissable
subject to the following conditions:
Such equipment sha~l be stored on private
property in yard areas excluding the front
yard setback area.
2. Stored equipment shall be registered to,
leased to or rented to the owner or renter of
the property.
3. Stored equipment shall be limited to
than.four (4) recreational vehicle~.
no more
Stored equipment shall not exceed thirty (30)
feet in length.
Existing uses shall comply with this provision
within twelve (12) months following enactment of
this Ordinance.
In all districts, the City may require~ a
Conditional Use Permit for any exterior storage if
it is demonstrated that such storage is a hazard to
the public health, safety, convenience, morals, or
has- a depreciating effect upon nearby proper.~
values, or impairs scenic views, or constitutes
threat to living amenitie, s ....
lta~or
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Adopted by the City Council August 12, 1986
Published in The Laker, September 2, 1986
3030 Harbor Lane North,
Suite 104
Minneapolis, MinneSota 55441
612/553-1950
TO: City Council and Staf~
FROM: Mark Koegler, City Plannar. ~
DATE: September 9, 1986
SUBJECT: Recreational Vehicle Storage '
In order to determine how other communities regulate recreational vehicle
storage, I contacted the cities of Shorewood, Tonka Bay, Orono, Wayzata,
Minnetrista, Chanhassen and White Bear Lake. Copies of the ordinances for
Oroao and Chanhassen are enclosed.
The following is a summary of the findings: ..
Tonka Bay - Tonka Bay requires that all recreational vehicles be c, urren~y
licensed. Properly licensed vehicles can be stored anywhere on the property,
provided an .e~ foot se*_hack is observed from all public right-~f-w~ All
n~licensed vehicles ar~ r~zo'ved under the city's abaSd~ed vehicle o~di~ance.
Tonka Bay i~tdica~ed that they receive numerous complaints about boat storage.
Shorewood - Shorewood recently apDroved an ordinance requiring that
recreational vehicles be stored within the buildable area of a lot with two
except io~s'.
1. Storage is allowed within five ~.eeh nE hh~. property line in side and
rear yards.
2. One piece of recreational equipm-=ah ts allowed to be stored in the
~ ' driveway of a re~ide,~h[al lot providing that a 15 foot setback is
al)served from the paved portion of the pu~. lic street.
::~.~[h~. Bear Lake - White Bear Lake requires ~hat all recreational equipment be
stored in side or rear yards.
Wayzata - Wayzata cont=ols recreational vehicles through its o~f-shreet
parking requirements. Boats, travel trailers, motor h~es a,l:] ~.[.~h ~)u~-~-~'~ c~
no~ b~. shoce~ ~,3re than 72 hours on a piece of pro[:e_rty unless plac.~d within a
side or teac yard.
-Chanhassen - Chanhasse. n is c.~a.~idering an ordinance ceguiring storage in rear
or side yards, behind the. front yard setback line. The ordinance limits the
number oE vehicles to two for lots less tll~.~ one acre in size.
Orono - Orono allows stocage of c~.creational equipment less than 20 feet h~
~ in rear yards providing that a 10 foot setback is observed fr(~m all
prope, rty lines. Recreational eguipmeat la_~..~ tl~an 20 feet in length must be
stored within a buildin~ or fully screened. ...
Minnetrista - Minnetrista imposes t~o .~ets of standards, one Eoc "rural" lots
and the other for "urban" lots. Within ~he' urban area which includes 75% of .
Minnetrista's housing units, boats, t,milers an~ snowmobiles can be stored in'
front yards providing that they are surrounded by five to six foot high
screening. Recreational vehicles can also be stored in rear yards without
screening. In the rural area, equi[~menb can be stored subject to front, sid~
ad rear setback provisions. ~- ..
Orono
10.60
odorous or solid matter of such quality and quantity as to be
readily detectable at any' point beyond the lot line of the site on
which the use is located.
Subd. 7. Vibr,~tion. Any use creating periodic earth-
shaking vibrations, such las may be created from a drop forge shall
be prohibited if such vibrations are perceptible beyond the lot
line of the site on which the use is located. The standard shall
not apply to vibrations created during the process of construction.
Subd. 8. Glare or Heat. Any use requiring an operation
producing an intense heat or light transmission shall be performed
with the necessary shielding to prevent such heat or light from
being detectable at the lot line of the site on which the use is
located. Lighting in all instances shall be diffused or directed
away from "R" Districts and public streets.
Subd. 9. Explosives.' Any use requiring the storage,
utilization or manufacturing of products which could decompose by
detonation shall be located not less than 400..-feet from any
District line.
Subd.
required in residential zones where:
10. Screening Required. Screening shall be
-A. Any off-street parking
than four parking spaces and is within
residential lot line, and,
area which contains more
30 feet of an adjoining
B.. Where the driveway to' a parking area of more
than six parking spaces is within 15 feet of an adjoining
residential lot line.
Subd. 11. Screening, Type of. The screening required
herein shall consist of a solid fence or wall at least 50% open,
not less than four feet nor more than five feet in. height but shall
not extend within 15 feet of any street or driveway opening onto a
street. The screening shall be placed along the'property lines or
in case of screening along a street, 15 feet from the street right-
of-way with landscaping (treed, Shrubs, grass and other planting)
between the screening and the pavement. A louvered fence shall be
considered solid if it blocks direct vision. Planting of. a type
approved by the Planning Commission may also be required in
addition to, or in lieu of, fencing.
Subd. 12. Maintenance. In all districts, all
structures, required landscaping and fences shall be mainta'ined so
as not to be unsightly or present harmful health or safety
conditions.
Subd. 13. Exterior Storage in "R" Districts. In all "R"
Districts, all mobile materials and equipment shall be stored
ORONO CC 378 (4-1-84)
~ 10. ~0~'~
within a building .or fully screened so as not to be visible from
adjoining properties, except boats and unoccupied trailers less
than 20 feet in length, which are not stored for commercial
purposes, if stored to the rear of the house an~ a distance of 10
feet or more from any property line.
Source: Ordinance no. 172
......... ' .... .~- ~... . - .~ .~ Effective Date: 1-1-75
..... Subd. 14. Waste Materials. Waste material shall not be · washed into the public storm sewer
system nor the sanitary sewer
system without first having received a permit fo..do so from the
City.- 'If said permit is not granted, a method of disposal, shall be
devised which will not require continuous land requisition for
permanent operation and will not cause a detrimental effect to the
adjacent land. Should the waste be of solid form rathe~ than
fluid, the storage area shall be so located and fenced as to be
removed from public view. In all districts, all waste material,
debris, refuse, garbage, materials not currently in use for
construction or otherwise regulated herein shall be kept in an
enclosed building or properly contained in a closed container for
such purposes. The owner of vacant land shall be responsible for
keeping such vacant land free of waste material and noxious weeds.
· Subd. 15. Drainage. No land shall be developed and n
use shall be permitted that results in water runoff causing~''
flooding, or erosion'on adjacent properties. Such runoff shall he
properly channeled into a storm drain, water course, pending area
or other suitable facility.
Subd. 16. Traffic Control. The traffic generate4 by any
use shall be channelized and controlled in a manner that will avoid
congestion on public streets, safety hazards, or excessive traffic
~hrough residential'streets. Vehicles backing from a parkihg space
shall not back into the public street. No access-drive to any lot
shall be located within 20 feet of any two intersecting street
right-of-way iine~.
.......... Subd. 17. Radiation, Etc. No activities .shall be
permitted that emit dangerous radio activity beyond enclosed areas.
There shall be. no electrical disturbance adversely affecting the
operation of any point of any equipment including but not limited
to radio and television reception other than that of the creator of
the disturbance.
SEC. 10.61. SPECIAL PROVISIONS.
Subd. 1 Sign~ a.s Accessory Us.e. Signs are a permitted
accessory use in all districts sub3ect to the followiD-
regulations:
f <3 O ONO CC 379 ¢4-1-8,)
Chanhassen (proposed) --
6-1&-& Swtngs, sZtdes and-other' play equipment.
6-16-5
6-1&-6
Outdoor furniture.
Wood for burnin8 in a
as follows:'
fi'replace, stove or furnace provided it is stored
A. In a neat and secure stack.
B. It is not within five feet of a property line; ': ............ - .... .~-
C. The wood stack is not infected or inl~abtted with 'r'0de-nts.
SECTION 15. STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES: ",':'.,i ~.-: -' :.'' ..' ?.
Recreational vehicles may be parked or stored in a residential or a~rtcultural district
provided the following conditions are met:
6-15-1 No more than two (2) recreational vehicles may be parked or stored outside
on a residential lot less than one acre in size. No more than four (&) recrea-
tional vehicles may be parked or stored outside on a residential lot one
acre or larser in size providing that at least two (2) of these recreational
' vehicles are completely screened from view Er.om public streets or adjacent
property. Additional recreational vehicles may be kept within an enclosed
structure which otherwise conforms to the zoning requirements of the district.
6-15-2 ~ecreational vehicles must be maintained in a clean, "well-kept~ operable '
condition. ' '-
6-.15-3 Recreational vehicles shall be mobile and shall not be permanently affixed
in the ground in a manner that would prevent removal
6-15-6
6-15-5
6-1.5-6
Recreational vehicles may be parked or stored only on the rear or side yard
behind the required front yard setback. The parkin~ or storage of recreational
vehicles on the rear or side yard, as permitted herein, may be on surfaced
or unsurfaced areas.
,..
Recreational vehicles may be stored on a lot withou~'re~ard co the location
on the lot for the sole and express purpose of loading and unloading for
a period not to exceed twenty-four (2t) hours ....
Unmounted side-in pickup campers, must be stored no higher than t~enty inches
(20") above the ground and must be securely, supported at least' at four (&)
corners by solid support blocks or support mechanisms.
6-15-7
6-15-8
Recreational vehicles may not be occupied or used for living, sleeptng:.or
housekeepinE purposes while parked or stored.
Except for routine maintenance or durin§ emergency conditions when power
supply is disrupted, the operation of a recreational vehicle po~er generator
plant shall not be permitted in residential districts. Routine maintenance
periods shall not exceed sixty (60) minutes per month.
-77-
~~ McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc.
12800 Industrial Park Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55441
612/559-3700
1-800328-8322 Ext. 784
April 6, 1987
Engineer~
Planners
Surveyors
Mr. Edward 3. Shukle, gr.
City Manager
City.of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
SUBdECT: Hennepin County Road No. 15
144A ~8087
DealEd:
As you are aware, we have received from Hennepin County a copy of the
preliminary construction plans for County Road 15 from Commerce Boulevard to
Seton Channel. They have also forwarded a preliminary cost .estimate of what
Mound's participation would be in this project, a copy of which is attached.
As requested, we have prepared a very preliminary cost estimate for adding new
street lights to the project from Commerce Boulevard to Fairview Lane and the
replacement of watemain from Fairview Lane to Fernside Lane.
If the City should decide to proceed with either or both the new street
lights and/or the watemain replacement, Mennepin County would like final plans
submitted'to them by the first part of dune. They anticipate their final
construction plans will be completed and submitted to Mound for approval by
late summer or early fall. The project would be bid in danuary or February for
construction in the summer of 1988. The following is a brief summary of each
portion of the County Road 15 project, which the City should review.
WATERHAIN REPLACEMENT
The existing inplace watemain from Fairview Lane east to approximately 300
feet west of Fernside Lane is of 1930 vintage. The remainder of the main east
to Fernside Lane was constructed in the early 1960's. 8oth of these sections
have a record of numerous watermain breaks and should be replaced since it is
located within the paved portion of the new road construction. If the main is
rebuilt, most of services and curb stops should also be replaced at the same
time. Our rough estimate for this watemainreplacement is $55,000.00.
Hennepin County has suggested, and we would agree, that the replacement be bid
with the County project to minimize the. cost. If it is the City's desire to
proceed in this manner, final plans would need to be prepared and submitted to
Hennepin County by early dune. We would consider this to be a capital
.improvement, which would not be assessed to the property owners.
STREET LIGHTS
At the present time, there exists eight (8) old-style fluorescent street
Iights between Commerce Bouievard and the Post Office. These iights are
outdated and expensive to operate and maintain, in fact, the one in front of
Century Auto Body had to be removed and has not been repiaced. Four of the
Mr. Edward O. Shukle, Or.
April 6, 1987
Page Two
lights appear to be within the area of the proposed reconstruction on County
Road 15 and may need to be relocated by the County's Contractor. We have
prepared a rough cost estimate for installing 30 new high_pressuresodium
street lights between Commerce Boulevard and F~rview~e. The estimated cost
is $132,000, of which a very small amount, approximately $8,000, would be paid
by Hennepin County if the four (4) existing lights need to be relocated due to
their construction. One suggested method of financing this project would be as
follows:
City Owned Property and intersecting streets
Private Property
Total Footage served by New Street Lights
$ 1,840 L.F.
4~300 L.F.
$ 6,140 L.F.'
City Property
Private Property
1,840 L.F. ~ 6,140 L.F.
4,300 L.F. ~ 6,140 L.F.
City Share of Cost 65% (30% + 35%)
Cost to be Assessed to Private Property
$85,800.00
$46,200.00
Cost per lineal foot to be assessed
$46,200.00 + 4,300 L.F. $ 10.74/~
The street lights that were installed on Comme~ce Boulevard in 1981 cost
$187,252.13 of which $68,700.00 was assessed. Residential p~operty was
assessed $4.38/L.F. and all remaining property paid $6.57/L.F.
COUNTY ROAD 15 RECONSTRUCTION
As you will note from the attached cost estimate from Hennepin County, the
City of Mound's share of the project is approximately $262,320. Some of these
items are eligible for state aid reimbursement to either the County or the
City, but not both. If the City wants to use money from their MSA construction
fund, an agreement will need to be negotiated with Hennepin County because they
have first priority on state aid funds since it is their project. We would
suggest the City use monies from their MSA Construction Fund to finance to the
limit items which are eligible and negotitate the details with Hennepin County
before approving the plans. We have estimated that approximately $189,600.00
of the $262,320.00 would be eligible for state aid reimbursement.
When County Road 110 was improved in 1~81, a portion of the cost was
assessed to the abutting property owners. We wouid suggest that some of the
cost of this project aiso be assessed. If the totai cost of Mound's share of
the cost for curb and gutter and driveway aprons were assessed'on a iineai foot
basis, the proposed assessment would be $5.46/L.F. ($55,683 ~ i0,200.00 L.F.).
Of the total footage the City owned property and intersecting streets again
account for approximately 30%, which would require the City to pay
Mr. Edward O. Shukle, dr.
April 6, 1987
Page Three
approximately $16,380.00 (3,000 L.F. · $5.46/LF). The cost for the stom sewer
improvements could be assessed much the same way. For discussion purposes, we
estimated the drainage area at 2,500,000 S.F., with the City property
comprising 30~ of this total. The total cost to Mound for storm sewer
improvements on County Road ~5 is approximately $121,000.00. Assuning this
cost is assessed on a square foot'basis over the projected drainage area, this
cost would be approximately $.048/SF ($121,000 - 2,500,000 S.F). The City's
share of the storm sewer would' then be approximately $36,000.00 (750,000 SFO
$.048/SF).
Again for 'discussion purposes, we are proposing to assess 25~ ($14,643.00)
of total cost ($58,573.00) of the sidewalk construction. On a lineal foot
basis, this would be approximately $2.00/LF ($14,643.00 - 7,200 LF). The City
would pick up the remaining cost of $43,930.00.
When County Road 110 was improved in 1981, the abutting properties were
assessed $3.45 per line, foot for curb and gutter, $1.53 per square foot for
driveway aprons and $0. per square, foot for storm sewer. None of the
sidewalk cost was assessed, probably because a major portion of it was
replacement and therefore, Hennepin County did not cha~ge Mound.
This information' has been submitted to you for discussion purposes with the
City Council. If they should decide to 9o ahead with any of these projects and
intend on assessing any of the cost, a more detailed report will be required
and public hearings need to be held.
If you or the Council should have any questions, or require any additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Jg:jmj
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Cameron
SUMMARY OF COST AND ~TNOD OF PAY~NT
Estimated Cost to Mound for County Road Improvements
Wate~main Replacement
Street Lights
TotaI Estimated Cost -Aii Projects
INCOME - STATE AID MONEY AND ASSESSHENTS
Street Light Assessment 4,300 L.F. 0 $10.74/LF
Curb & Gutter & Conc. Apron
Assessment 7,200 L.F. 0 $ 5.46/LF
Storm Sewer Assessment 1,750,000 S.F. · $0.048/SF
Sidewalk Assessment 7,200 L.F. · $ 2.00/LF
Total Assessments (Private Property)
State Aid Reimbursement
Rrojected Income
Total Estimated Cost for all projects
Project Income
Deficit (to be paid by the City)
$1~2~ooo
449,320'
$ 46,182
39,312
84,000
14,4oo
$ 183,894
189~600
$ 373,494
$ 449,320
373~494
$ 75,826
O0
0oo
000
t~oo
0oo
o
o
0 o
0 o
0 0
~" 0
00000 0
000~0 0
00000 0
bpamt/~u~ ..... the City of Mound.~ a
· '; ' .T . April
MinnesOta municiPal, corporation
Lot 22, Block 5, Dreamwood .PID #13-117-24.~12 0026,.City of Mound, Hennepin' County,
Mi nnesota
~ ~al~e anb to ill~olb. :Z'Ae above r~t,~ ln-~niaea ~ f~ one ear ....................
......... J.~t~ .................................. ~V of ...... ~.~.i.1 .................. .
~ ~ ,~ ~...... a~r~..i. ~ a~ w~ t~ ~ L~or .... ~ ~ ~ ~f ~ f~ ~ove ~ p~
It is sPecificall.y understood and agreed by and between, the par~ies ~hat the lessee
shall only have a right to use a portion of the aforedescrlbed lands and tha~ the
only use that they may pu~ this proper~y to is' ~o plant a garden, lt. is further
understood and agreed [ha~ the lessor, re~alns all rlgh~s ~o use and maintain ~he
properW and.tha~ the gardening shall no~ in any ~ay ln~erfere ~ith the lessor~s
main purpose for this land. The lessee'further agrees .lha~ In addition to the
aforementioned considera~lon, ~hey ~.11 maintain the site, mo~ing the grass, cu=tlng
the ~eeds and keeping the properW*clear of ~i~ter during the ~erm of this lease.
The only purpose for ~hich the lessee:may use this ground is to plant.a vegetable
9arden and ~here shall be no. sto~age, parking or other use of this property by the
lessee.
:I
~llbtlZttl~t, ~I~IV~ .... lqth ' ' ',~,~¥ o! .... April
City.of Houndt a Hinnesota municipal corporation
Lo~s 10, 11 and 12, Block q,'L.p. Crevler's S~bdivision' Par~ of Lot 36
Lafayette Park, City of Hound, Hennepin County, Hinnesota" ~; ...
............ 1..~.tb ................... 8~3/ of .......... Ap.r.i.L ........... --, 2988 ...... ' .-_
It is specifically understood and agreed by'and'be~ween the parties that the lessee
shall.only have a right to use a portlon~of the aforedescribed lands and that the only
use that they may put this property to is to p].ant a garden. It is farther under-
stood and agreed that the lessor retains'all rights to use.and maintain the proper, ty
for a municipal well site and that the gardening sha]l not in any way interfere with
the lessor~s ~in purpose for this iand. The lessee further agrees that In addition
to the afor~entioned consideration, they'will 'maintain the site, mowing the grass,
cutting the weeds and keeping the we]] site clear of litter during the term of this
lease. The only purpose for which the lessee may u.se this ground is to plant ~
vegetable garden and there shall.be no'storage~ parking or other use of this property
by the ]essee.
~s ~ CITY OF HOUND
Eay Kramer -
Ho, ~ 533 -L~--~l-'O~w~ Yom t
Lots 1, 2, ~ & 22, Block 5, Dreamwood,. PIg ~13-117-24 12 0223 -;:
I~o ~abt anb to Wu[b. The a~ow r~f,~T p~em,~aea z~ta t~ ~ L~a~....% ...... ~he.i~. ................ ~rf G~
~t~, /~ ~ ~r~d t~e /~t ~ o~.....:. ............... ~...Y~..C.....: .................................................... ./ro~ G~ G/~ ~I~
............. : ........... !~.~ ............................. ~v of ................. ~.~.L.! ........................ , ~9....~. .............................................................
~ t~ m~ Z~f~....s a~r~...... ~ a~ w~k t~ ~ L~or...... ~ ~ ~ r~ ~or ~ a~ve ~ pre~
ues t~ ~m ~....~.n~....~.~.LL~.r.....~L..~.~.~-.~.~.~....~.~.~.~.~...g~...a~...xa.].~.~.~].L~..~..i.~.~.~a..LL~.-~L:~8
It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the parties that the lessees
s~11 only have a right to.use the aforedescrlbed lands and that the only use that
they may put this property to Js to.plant a garden. The lessees further agreed that
they ~111 main:ain the site, mowing 'the grass, cut:ing the weeds and keeping the s~te
clear, of li::er during the term of :~is.lease. THe only purpose for ~H1ch :he lessees
may use ~his ground is to plant'a vegetable garden, .which may not be used as e
commercial garden plot, and there.shall be no storage, parking or other use of this
property,by the Jessees.
~ ~ t~ ab~w m~ p~ ~ ~t~ s~, or ~ pay t~
for t~ ~
a~ve ~ CITY OF HOUND
~, ~ ~ D~[ve~ ~ P~ o/ .~yS?...~ ....................... ~ ....................................... ....(8~).:
..........................................................................
................................................ City Hanager . ~'~
'' T&S-~T~'~ ...........................................
.....................................................................
Beverly Nallis
RESOLUTION NO. 87-
Apt.il l~t, 1987
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO SELL CITY PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the City of Mound owns the southwest 1/2 of Lot
16, Block 1~, Arden; and
WHEREAS, Tuxedo Blvd. is completed in front of the lot
and no right-of-way for that street was required on the City
owned property; and
WHEREAS, Brighton Blvd is a State Aid road and if any
anytime in the future this street was improved with State Aid
money, the State will require that the City have a 60 foot right-
of-way; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has no objection to selling
all of the City owned part of Lot 16 except any of it located
within 30 feet of the present Brighton Blvd. right-of-way.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of'
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize the Mayor and
City Manager to execute a Quit Claim Deed to Andrew Scott and
Elizabeth Ann Cummings, for $~00.00, selling the following
described City property:
"That part of Lot 16, Block 18, Arden, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin 'County, Minnesota, lying
easterly of the west 30.00 feet of said Lot 16 and southerly
of the following described line:
Beginning'at the northwest corner of said Lot 16; thence
in a southeasterly direction to the southeast corner of
said Lot 16 and said line there terminating."
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
..... The"followlng Councilmembers voted, in-the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
25
~6
Marshi
28
31
30
13
8
16 -
L
*°' : ' ' 't' ' * :'" ~ '"'
~$-. .: ": ~ .' :. .-.
· .~.' .. :..... , =..: -.. ~
·. . . '.'-..' . :.~. ',:.,
I hereb~ certff7 that
I surveyed tho proper~ described above,,n~ t~at tho abram",'~
~lat h · correct ~ra~enf~tlo= of m~M aureev.' ..... ...-:- ,-4,
· ... '..: .:.'- . , .~. ..... :.-...;~:~"
a~eps~ .'& oon~. ate valk encroach into
vas t~"f~ ~o .BI~. ~v por~
.,.... . .;:~
N0 delinquent ~es ~d ~sfez en~red; Certificate
of.Real Estate V~ue ( ) filed ( ) not requ~ed
Ce~ificate of Re~ Es~te V~ue No.
,1g -
County Audito,
by Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:_ Aprl ] ,19 ~87 _
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, ~ i c i oel Corporation undO:
_ _ _: .. _ . G:a~tor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to Andrew ~;cott and
, __ , O:antee (s),
I I I ' ' ' . ' I~ ~ - . CounW, Minneso~, described ~ foBows:
property in H.nne~ ~
That part of Lot 16~ alock 1~, Arden, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, ~innesota, lying easterly of the west 30.00.feet of said Lot
16 and southerly of the following described l~ne:
Beginning at the no~hwest corner of said Lot 16; thence ~n a southeasterly
direction to the southeast corner of sald Lot 16 and sa~d llne there
terminating.
(if more soece Is needed, continue off bock)
together ~th all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto.
CI~'Y OF MOUND'
Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here
By
By_
~ayor
City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA 1
COUNTY OF He~er; ~ - ·
The foregoing was acknowl~dged before me this 14 dayof April '~ ,19 87 ,
by_ .~teve 5mltl~ and City Manaqer
the~ ~ - , a ~unicipal corporation
of t~ ~ ~ Mound CitV of Mound ..'
under the laws of ~' on beh~f of ~e _
~OZA~ZA~ SZA~P OR SZA~ (OR O~ZR ~Z~Z O~ ~A~X) --
~ SIGNATURE 0F pERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT
&x Stltement*'for the re~ Vtoperty described in thil ~t ~o~d
': ~, sent to (lneludo fl~e And address of Gr~te,): '
DRAFTE~
~HISINSTRVMENTWAS
Francene C. Clark
Clty Clerk
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road ·
Mound, MN. 55364 .
April 14, 1987
RESOLUTION 87-
RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE QUIT CLAIM DEED SELLING CITY PROPERTY
WHEREAS, Island Park was platted in the early 1900's and
thi~ platting was done on paper without looking at the topography
of the land; and
WHEREAS, when the lake was raised some of this platted
land became wetlands or part of'the lake itself; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Net1 Weber owns Blocks 15 and 16, Whipple,
which do not abut an improved City street and are unbulldable
because the City of Mound's Zoning Ordinance requires property to
abut an improved street and have a 50 foot frontage on that
street to be bulldable; and
WHEREAS, on May 14, 1985, (Resolution #85-53), the City
Council vacated the following unimproved streets:
Windsor Lane (between Blocks 15 and-16)
Drummond Road (between Blocks 10 and 15)
Cobden Lane (between Blocks 10 and 11) also known as
Gobden Lane
(see Exhibit "A"); and
WHEREAS, in order to gain access to Blocks 15 and 16
from an improved street (Hanover Road), Mr. Weber needed to
purchase Lots 2, 3, 4, 22, 23, 24 and part of Lot 1, Block 11,
Whipple and parts of Lots 13, lq, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21,
Block 10, Whipple, which were State owned, tax forfeit parcels;
and
WHEREAS, in order to help make this project.conform with
our Zoning Ordinance and constitute a sound and orderly
development of land, the City then requested that the County
Board allow the City to purchase the property and then resell it
to Mr~ Weber for the price paid, plus administrative expenses;
and
WHEREAS, the County Board agreed to sell the City the
property (PID t25-117-2a 12 0225 for $1,568.00; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Weber is now requesting that the City sell
this property to him.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota:
April 14, 1987
1. Does hereby authorize the Mayor and City Manager to
execute a Quit Claim Deed to The Weber Group, Inc. for
the following described property: ·
"PID #25-117-24 12 0225; City of Mound; ADDN "Whipple"
Lots 2 B 4 22 2B and 24 Blk 11 also that part of Lot 1
Blk 11 and Lots 13 thru 21 incl Blk 10 also that part of
vacated Cobden La desc as fols beg at NW cot of Lot 1
Blk 11 th E along N line thof dist 22 ft th S 41 deg 59
rain 14 sec E dist 26.91 ft th S 44 deg B mtn B9 sec E
dist ~B.14 ft th S 50 deg 21 rain 21 sec E dtst 45.~5 ft
th S 51 deg 20 min 25 sec E dist 19.21 ft th S 50 deg 28
rain B9 sec E dist 51.86 ft th S 68 deg 11 rain 55 sec E
dist ~B.08 ft th S 80 deg 4 min 26 sec E dist 40.61 ft
th N 75 deg 57 rain 50 sec E dist 41.23 ft th N 78 deg 41
rain 24 sec E dist 40.79 ft th E dist 40 ft th S 47 deg
43 min 35 sec E dist 4~.60 ft to S line of Lot 21 Blk 10
th W dist BSB ft to SE cot of Lot 24 Blk 11 th N to SE
cot of Lot 1 th W to SW cor thof N to beg incl adJ 1/2
of vac street."
®
The Weber Group, Inc.,will pay the following for the
property:
$1,568.00 - property described above
550.00 - administrative costs in obtaining the
land for sale
____~- Special Assessment Payment for 1987
$2,482.72 TOTAL
The remaining special assessments for the 1980 Street
Improvement (total of $3,005.54 principal) will be
assessed over' the nine remaining years of the assessment
at 8% interest on the unpaid balance, per year.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Form No. 31.M-QUIT CLAIM DEED Nim.¢,otJ Uniform
No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate
of Real Estate Value ( ) filed ( ) not requlre.d
Certificate of Real Estate Value No.
,19 ,
County Auditor
by Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $
Date:
,19 ,
(reserved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, ' the CFty of Mound
,a municloal cornoration underthelawsol
_R tat. r,~ M ;'nnp-~ , Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to
~he Weber Grouo. Inc. ,Grantee,
a corporation under the ]aws of ~;[ate of Hinnesota ,realprop. ertyin
Hennep i n ' C(~unty, Minnesota, described as follows:
PID #25-117-24 12 0225; City of Mound; AODN "Whipple" - Lots 2'3 4 22 23 and 24, Blk 11 also
chat part of Lot 1 Blk 11 and Lots 13 thru 21 incl. BIk 10 also that part of vacated Cobden
La desc as fols beg at NW cdr of Lot 1.Blk 11 th E along N 'line thor dist 22 ft th S 41 del
59man 14 sec E dist 26,91 ft th S .44 deg 3 man 39 sec E dist 43,14 ft th 5'50 deg 21.man 21
sec E dist 45,45 ft th S 51 deg 20 mln 25 sec E dist 19,21 ft th S 50 deg 28 mis 39 sec E
dist 51,86 ft th S 68 deg.ll mln 55 secE dist 43,08 ft th S 80 deg 4 mln 26 sec E dist 40.61
ft th N 75 deg 57 mln 50 sec E dist 41,23 ft th N 78 deg 41 mis 24 sec. E dist 40,79 ft th E
dlst 40 ft th S 47 deg 43 man 35 se¢'E dist' 44,60 ft to $ 1Liie of Lot 21 Blk 10 th W dist
353 ft tO SE car of Lot 24 Blk !1 th N to'SE car of Lot 1 th W to. SW car thor th N to beg
incl adj 1/2 of var, street,
|If more space Ts needed, continue on back)
together with aLI hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto.
CITY OF MOUND
Affix Deed Tax Stamp Here By
Its Mayor
By
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF Hennep i n
The foregoing was acknowledged before ~e thi~
the Maynr
Of i;he Cil;y of Mound
under the hw~ of State of ~nnesot~
Its City Manager
NOTARIAL STAMP OR SEAL (OR OTHER TITLE OR RANK)
,.day of A~ril ,'19 87.,
and Edward J. Shukle, Jr ..... ,
.,Da be~aL~ofthe city of MmJnd ....
SIGNATURE OF PERSON TAKING ACKNOWLEDGMENT .
Tax Statements for the reel properly dsmcztbed h, %hi. im~r,m~e~t mhould
be sent to (Includg name and addre~ of Ormntee):
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DILAFTED BY ~AME AND ADDRESS):
Francene C. Clark
City Clerk
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound~ MN, 55364
April 1~, 1987
RESOLUTION NO. 87-
RESOLUTION RECONVEYING (IF NECESSARY) CERTAIN
TAX FORFEIT LANDS BACK TO THE STATE AND REQUESTING
THE COUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SALE
OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE
TO OWNERS OF ADJOINING LANDS
WHEREAS, the City of Mound has been informed by the
Department of Property Taxation of Hennepin County that certain
lands within the City have been forfeited for non-payment of real
estate taxes; and "
WHEREAS, the City of Mound has a number of tax parcels which
do not comply with the City's zoning ordinance and building codes
because of a lack of minimum area, shape, frontage, access prob~
lems, or the parcels contain nuisances or dangerous conditions
which are adverse to the health, safety and general welfare of
residents of this City; and
WHEREAS, the City was instrumental in obtaining legislation
which would allow said parcels to be withheld from public-sale
and sold at a non-public sale to eliminate nuisances and
dangerous conditions and to increase compliance with land use
ordinances and Minnesota Laws of 1982, Chapter 523, Article 39,
Sect. 6 was adopted to provide said.authority to the City and the
County'; and
WHEREAS, a specific list of tax forfeited lands has been
provided the City and the City wishes to restrict and
condition the sale of certain lands to bring them into
conformance with City ordinances and land use goals; and
WHEREAS, all special assessments were cancelled at the
time of forfeiture and may be reassessed after the property is
returned to private ownership pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
282.02 (also note: M.S. ~29.07, Subd. ~; M.S. ~3§.23 and M.$.
4~4.076); and
WHEREAS, all special assessments that have been levied since
forfeiture shall be included as a separate item and added to the
appraised value of any such parcel of land at the time it is sold
(M.S. 282.01, Subd. 3).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota:
The County Board is hereby requested to impose con'dl-
tions on the sale of the following described lands, and
is further requested to sell such lands only to owners
of lands adjoining at a non-public sale so that said
lands will be combined for tax and land use purposes and
April 14, 1987
PARCEL (PID)
REASON FOR'
AND CONDITIONS
TO
will comply with City ordinances and regulations:
SPECIALS LEVIED
BEFORE
FORFEITURE
(Lot 2~, Block 13,Undersized lot to be
Avalon) sold only to and
combined with ad-
Joining properties
NONE
Lot 2, Block lB, Avalon is approved to be split off of PID
119-117-23 31 0047.
This.land was conveyed to the City in State Deed ~761656 on
April 21, 1961 for road and drainage purposes. The City has
determined that it does not need Lot 2, Block 13, Avalon,
except for the easement that should be put on'this lot in
favor of the City of Mound.
"A permanent easement for utility and drainage purposes
over, under and across' Lot 2, Block 13, AVALON,
aocording to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin
County, Minnesota. Said easement being all that part
of Lot 2 which lies northeasterly of a line described
as follows:
Beginning at a point on the west line of said Eot
2, distant 3.00 feet south of the northwest corner
of said Lot 2; thence southeasterly to a point on
the east line of said Lot 2, distant 35.00 feet
south of the northeast corner of said Lot 2 and
said line there terminating."
2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to release the aforementioned lands for sale,
subject to the County imposing the aforestated condi-
tions and the lien of special assessments on said
lands.
3. · The City of Mound is releasing the above properties
~subJect to street and utility easements being retained
by the City of Mound.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
SPECIALS LEVIED
SINCE
FORFEITURE
NONE
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
'Mayor ' '
Oepartment of Taxation Form No. 108 Approved by AttorneY General 7.2(~69
BY CO~~ S~DI~SIONS
WHEREA~, Pursuant to Minneso~ ~tatutes, ~ection 282.01, aubdlvlsion 1, the ~TATE
0F MINNESOTA, as trustee under Minnesota Statute, Section 281.25, on the ~ s ~
de, of A~rit .,19 6~ ; conveyed to C~ty o~ ~e,~nd (~ n~ ~7~)
a governmental subdivision, certain l~nds, of which the lands hereinafter described are a portion, to
used for an author~ed public use, and
W~REAS, Said governmental subdivision has failed to put the lams herei~fter
des~i~d to the public use for which it was conveyed and the governing body thereof has author~ed
the proper officers to convey the same ~ the State of Mi~esota, as such trustee,
NOW, T~REFORE, This ~denture, made this 18 lb day of Ap ri 1 ,
19~, between C i ~v of ~o.nd , a gove~entai subdivision of the
State of Mi~esota, as party of the first part, and the State of Minneso~, as trustee ~ hereafter set
forth, as party of the second pa~,
WITNESSETH, That the said p~y of the first part, in consideration of the pre.sea
and other valuable consideraMons, the receipt whereof is hereby ac~owledged, does hereby Grant,
gain, Quitclaim and Reconvey unto the said pa~y of the se~nd part all the tract or parcel of land
and being ~ the County of ~e~eO i n in the S~te of Minneso~, described as follows, ~wit:
ho~ 2. 8lock 1], Avalon. exceot fo~ the follo~in9 easement that should be out on this
lot in favor of the ~lty of ~ound: (SEE RE$0L~T[0~ ~87-
A permanent easement for utility and drainage purposes over, under and across
Lot 2,' Block 1), AVALON, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota. Said easement being all that part of.said Lot 2 which lies
northeasterly of a line described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the'west.line of 'said Lot 2, distant ).00 feet
south of the northwest corner of said Lot 21 thence southeasterly to e
point on the east line of said Lot 2, distant )5.00 feet south of the
northeast corner of said Lot 2 and.said line there terminating:..
and i~ ri t~. rlo~b '" and i~ corporate se~ to be
hereunto afl, ed the day and year first above written.
In Presence of:
STATE OF ~fllqlqESOTA ].ss.
COUNTY OF H~nn-p~n
On this
a ~Jr~i'ary P,~B1 |c
CITY OF MOUND
Name of Governmental Sub~iston
Its Hayor
Its City Clerk
day of , 19 , before me,
within and for said county, personally appeared .
and ,
to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn say that they are respectively
th- Maynr and the C:itv Clerk of the
governmental subdivision named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to
said instrument is the corporate seal of said governmental subdivision, and that said
instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said governmental subdivision by authority
of it~ C i t¥ Counc i l and safd Mayo r
and C i tv C; 1 erk , acknowledged said instrument to be the free
act and deed of said governmental subdivision.
APPROVAL
The undersigned, acting for the Commissioner of Taxation of the State of Minnesota, under delegation of authority duty
filed with the Secretary of State, does hereby approve the foregoing conveyance to the State of Minnesota.
Dated :.
In the Presence of:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Commissioner of Taxation
A. THOMAS WURST, P.A.
CURTIS A. PEARSON, P.A.
UAMES O. LARSON, P.A.
THOMAS F. UNDERWOOD, P.A.
CRAIG M. MERTZ
ROGER d. Ir[LLOWS
LAW OFFICIr$
WURST, PEARSON, I.ARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ
I100 FIRST SANK PLACE: WF. ST
MINN£APOLI$, MINNESOTA 5540:)
April 8, 1987
(612) 33B-4~00
Mayor and City Council
City of Mound, Minnesota
Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re: Annual Report
Dear Mayor, Councilmembers, and Ed:
Ed has indicated that the Council would like some background
information on legal services provided by our firm in 1986.
My partner Jim Larson handles the criminal aspect and all the
prosecution along with other associates or partners in our firm.
I have asked him to provide a prosecution summary for 1986, and
that letter under date of April 7, 1987, is attached. I believe
that letter is self-explanatory and gives you a great deal of
detail concerning the criminal aspects and the City's participation
in the court system for 1986.
Ed has further asked that I report to the Council on major
activities that have taken place in 1986 or major pieces of legal
work. We continue to be involved in all of the subdivision matters
which take place in the City'and handling title problems and
working with the planner and the building department. The Allied
Painting case has gone on throughout the year and has right now
been through an arbitration hearing and will undoubtedly be certified
for trial once we get the arbiter's decision.
Continental Telephone activities were a big part of the
relationship between the City and our office in 1986. The City
was considering condemning the telephone system and attempting
to negotiate with Continental Telephone on the question of rates
and other matters. This was a continuing activity until the
consultant's report indicated it was not feasible for the City
to condemn the system.
The City Hall roof problem was on-going during the year
and was finally settled with the Council's approval. This litigation
is now being brought to a conclusion.
WUR,~T, PEARSON, LAR$ON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ
Page 2
Mayor and City Council
Mr. Ed Shukle
April 8, 1987
The City had substantial land acquisition activity in 1986
in that the Lynwood Boulevard improvement proceedings were completed,
a lot was acquired from Steve Coddon, and the Lost Lake land
case was completed in the City's favor and the registration was
completed. Work took place in several areas on preparing agreements
and negotiating between the City of Mound and its neighboring
cities concerning the extension of utilities to serve properties
outside the City. These types of activities were generally charged
back against the developer.
The City Code was completed after more than three years
of work and has been printed and distributed. The lion's share
of the work on this matter was done by Mr. Craig Mertz of this
office and my assistant Lucy Hadler. This involved a great deal
of time for Fran Clark and other department heads, but particular
thanks is owed to Fran for her help and assistance in bringing
this to fruition.
Our firm of six attorneys has five attorneys who do work
for the City on various occasions. The lion's share of the civil
work is done by me, criminal work mainly by Jim Larson, land
title work by Tom Underwood, and Roger Fellows and Craig Mertz
work on prosecution and other miscellaneous matters. Basically,
we feel it has been a good year in that the City has had no
serious losses and all of our officials and employees have remained
outside the jail! We look forward to continuing to work with
the new Council and the fine administrative staff which Mound
has assembled over the years.
City Attorney
City of Mound
CAP:Ih
Enclosure
A. THOMAS WURST. P.A.
Cu1~1'15 A. P£AR$ON. P,A.
THOMAS ~. UNO~WO0O, P.A.
CRAIG M. MER~
ROGER U. ~ELLOWS
LAW OFFICES
WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & ME;RTZ
IIOO FIRST BANK I=LACE WEST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNr$OTA 5540~'
April 7, 1987
Ed Shukle, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re: 1986 Prosecution Summary
Dear Ed:
Pursuant to your request, I have summarized my prosecution
activities for the year 1986. The 1986 totals are:
Total number of cases: 2346
Case by type:
misdemeanor and petty misdemeanors: 2296
gross misdemeanors 50
Total cases resolved before pretrial: 2189
Misdemeanor cases resolved at pretrial: 117
Misdemeanor cases resolved after pretrial: 54
Court trials:
4O
Total hours:
Of the 2346 total cases, 221 were initiated by formal
complainants, which I prepare after a review of the case file. I
have reviewed the formal complaint records and the following
summary shows how the formal complaint requests originated:
Formal Complaints
Zoning & Building Code Enforcement:
Police Department requests:
Unanswered tickets:
Gross Misdemeanors:
Court demands:
Animal violations:
Bad Checks:
Total complaints:
14
117
70
5O
27
26
12
221
The above column of numbers adds to more than 221 because
there is duplication. For example, all gross misdemeanors are
initiated by police department request, and all the animal
violation complaints (dog at large and dog license 9iolations)
were unanswered tickets.
WURST, PEARSON, LAR$ON~ UNDERWOOD ~ MERTZ
Ed Shukle
Page Two
April 7, 1987
The hours spent can really be broken down into three
categories: (1) arraignments, pretrials and court trials, (2) jury
trials, and (3) preparing complaints. Mound has been allocated
two Mondays per month for arraignments, pretrial and court trials.
Generally, arraignments and pretrials are scheduled on Monday
mornings and pretrials and court trials on Monday afternoons.
Jury trials are scheduled for 8:30 a.m. Monday thru Friday on the
weeks we do not have arraignments. As you know, the City has a
policy of not negotiating on DWI cases where there has been a test
refusal or a test result of .12 or higher. While this has
resulted in more cases being, set for trial, in every case the
defendant has pleaded guilty to the DWI on or before the day of
trial.
As you can see from the hourly breakdown below, a large
percentage of time is used preparing complaints. This is a
necessary element of prosecution, and one which seems to grow each
year. When local prosecutors were given the authority to handle
gross misdemeanors, the formal complaint load went up. There is
legislation pending which would create several new gross
misdemeanors, which in turn will require that more of my time is
spent preparing complaints.
Prosecution Time Summary:
Arraignments, Pretrials & Court Trials:
Jury Trials:
Complaints:
Other:
160 hours
75 hours
185 hours
15 hours
Total: 435 hours
secretarial (no charge)
600 hours
In summary, my perception of the prosecution function is that
the time required is gradually increasing in proportion to the
general increase in police activity. I also expect an increase in
formal complaints. I appreciate the support I receive every day
from your staff and I look forward to a continuation of a very
workable and professional relationship.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please do
WURST, PEARSON, LAR$ON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ
Ed Shukle
Page Three
April 7, 1987
not hesitate to contact me.
cc:
Curtis A. Pearson
Len Harrell
VgrY tr~/~y yours,
<, Jam~ D. Larson
A. THOMAS WURST. P.A,
CURTIS A PEARSON. ID.A,
dAMES 0. LARSON,
THOMAS Ir. UNDERWOOD, P.A.
CRAIG M.
ROGER d. FELLOWS
WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD ~,~ MIt'RTZ
A IBANTNERiLNIII~ INCLUDIN~ ~)I~o!r[IISIONAL ASIOClATIONS
I100 FIRST ~AN~ PLACE W~ST
~INNEAPOLIS, MINNEgOTA S5402
~pr~l 8, 1987
(61~) 338 '~,S)00
Abdo, Abdo, and Eick
Certified Public Accountants
3500 West 80th Street, Suite 440
Minneapolis, MN 55431
Mound City Council
Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re:
Mound Claims Audit and Summary
for Year 1986
Gentlemen:
I have been contacted by John Norman, Finance Director,
and Ed Shukle, City Manager, for the City of Mound who have directed
me to prepare a status report for outstanding claims that existed
on December 31, 1986, and also to report on claims and matters
which have come to our attention since that date. Mr. Norman
has authorized me to release this information to Abdo; Abdo,
and Eick as auditors for the City for the calendar year 1986.
I wish to preface my remarks and my report by stating that
during the year a number of people threatened litigation against
the City. These threats are received at Council meetings, over
the telephone, and sometimes by mail, but most of those threats
do not turn into ~itigation. I all, want it understood that
a number of lawsuits and claims for damages against the City
are handled by the City's insurance companies, and the litigation
in those cases is conducted by insurance company lawyers rather
than the City Attorney. I do participate in a number of these
claims if the alleged amounts of damages are in excess of the
insurance coverages. The City generally does carry sufficient
insurance to cover the City adequately under the claims statute
and most normal claims. I will review for you litigation currently
being hnadled by me in this office as of December 31, 1986, and
to the date of this letter. The cases and their summaries are
as follows:
??o
WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & lV~ERTZ
Page 2
Abdo, Abdo, and Eick
April 8, 1987
1. Susan Carlson v. City of Mound.
lack of activity since 1984.
Closed in 1986 after
2. Ail Star Electric v. City of Mound.
No payment by City.
Closed in 1986.
3. Belcourt v. City of Mound. Closed in 1986. No payment
by City.
4. Lincoln Johnson v. City of Mound. Notice of claim
was filed by the City under date of October 4, 1985. The in-
formation has been provided to the City's insurance carrier,
and to the best of my knowledge there has been no further activity
and no litigation. We will close our file at this time.
5. Lyman Lumber Co. v. City of Mound and others. This
is an action to foreclose a mechanic's lien on a piece of property
in the'City of Mound and the City was named as a defendant.
I interposed an answer to this matter on April 16, 1984. The
plaintiff's attorney has not followed through and I am doing
nothing to stir up this old claim. I am not anticipating any
loss to the City.
6. Rager v. City of Mound. A summons and complaint was
served on the City in 1982 for a water damage claim. The matter
.was referred to the insurance company and an answer was interposed
by the City. To the best of my knowledge, there has been no
further activity on this file. I will close the file this year
if there is nothing new.
- ~
7. Sanderson v. City of Mound. Closed in 1986. No payment
by City.
8. Smith v. City of Mound. Resolved by the insurance
company in 1986. No activity by this office. The matter has
been closed.
9. Ziskin v. City of Mound. Closed in 1986. No payment
by City.
10. Steven Doe and Margaret Doe v. City of Mound and County
of Hennepin. This is a lawsuit which has been referred to many
times over the years and is far and away the most serious item
on the claims list. The plaintiffs have sued for $22,000,000
WURST, PEARSON, LAR$ON, UNDERWOOD & ~F..RTZ
Page 3 -
Abdo, Abdo, and Eick
April 8, 1987
alleging that their children were taken away from them improperly
by Hennepin County and representatives of the City of Mound;-
This arose out of a sexual abuse of children complaint. The
City's and the County's insurance companies are handling this
matter and I am involved only to the extent that the complain£
alleges more damages than the City carries in coverage. I have
worked with attorneys for our insurance company, and there have
been indications that our insurance company could have settled
this claim within our policy limits. We will continue to watch
this file, and I am sure the insurance companies will keep us
advised.
1!. Peterson v. City of Mound. This is a petition for
writ of mandamau and a complaint. The lawsuit was commenced
in 1984. The attorney for one of the individual defendants and
I have both interposed answers, and the plaintiff has not pursued
the matter. We will let this file rest, and if we hear nothing
in 1987 we will close our file.
12. Skinner v. City of Mound. This matter was dismissed
in 1986 with no payment by the City.
13. Voorhees v. City of Mound.
with no payment by the City.
This was closed in 1986
14. Allied Painting v. City of Mound. This is a claim
commenced by a contractor who was retained to paint our water
towers. The City is holding roughly $17,000, and the lawsuit
is now in the process of being tried. We are today sending a
copy of the City's brief to the City_Manager, but for the purposes
of the audit we ~ould point out thaYthe maximum amount of potential
liability for the City would be $17,000 to $20,000.
15. Hild v. City of Mound. This was a conciliation court
matter filed in 1986 and tried on May 12, 1986. We have heard
nothing from the court but the case was defended by our office
and we are presuming was upheld in the City's favor. We will
keep the matter on our claim list, and if nothing occurs in 1987,
we will close our file.
16. Davis v. City of Mound. A notice of claim has been
filed with the City for the back-up of a sewer. The damages
are apparently quite small and the matter has been referred to
the insurance company.
WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & IV~ERTZ
Page 4 .
Abdo, Abdo, and Eick
April 8, 1987
17. Marquardt v. City of Mound. A summons and complaint
was served on the City on October 27, 1986. The property owner
alleges that a member of the City crew dropped a tree on his
property and-he claims it did $10,000 damage to bis shrubs and
trees. The matter has been referred to the insurance company
and I am sure it will be vigorously defended. I shall continue
to watch if there is any need for direct City involvement.
18. J. M. Wood and K. U. Scballreuter. There are various
complaints filed by these two persons against the City allegin§
that the City has harmed these people in many respects. They
claim problems between the City and themselves regarding their
dog, their garbage, our police department, and the repression
of freedom in the City of Mound. We will hold the file open
and will take no action unless we hear further from the complainants.
19. Sufficool v. Calhoun Realty. This is an action where
a party is suing a realtor over a misrepresentation. The realtor's
attorney has filed an answer and a cross-claim and has put the
City on notice that his client obtained a plat map from the City
of Mound which he says contains a representation as to the frontage
of a lot. Basically, this has been stated to us as a potential
claim for the City, and we have retained it in our claim file,
but other than my discussion with the attOrney for the realtor,
there has been no further activity. We will want to watch this
to see that the City has no involvement.
I believe that the foregoing is a complete and up-dated
summary of any claims and litigation of which I am aware and
which have been referred to me by the City. You have also asked
the amount due fdr services and dis~ursements as of December
31, 1986, and that amount was $2290.50, and that amount has been
paid in its entirety.
I am not aware of any unasserted claims or assessments against
which I can comment or which have been noted in our claims file
other than those expressed herein. The City is involved in
special assessments, condemnation cases, and other matters where
lawsuits could be commenced, but to the best of my knowledge
I anticipate no damage against the City or proper City officials
of any unasserted claims. I as a matter of professional
responsibility to the City will advise the City or proper City
officials of any unasserted claims which come to my attention
and which may call for financial disclosure statements. As I
have indicated in prior reports, it is impossible to answer the
WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ
Page 5 ~
Abdo, Abdo, and Eick
April 8. 1987
question concerning unasserted claims because over the period
of a year there are a tremendous number of telephone calls, public
meetings, and Council meetings and people involved with the City
threaten litigation against the City. As I have previously stated,
very few of those outbursts ever result in litigation.
Curtis A. Pearson
City Attorney
City of Mound
CAP:Ih
cc: Mr. John Norman, Finance Director
For April 14, 1987 Council Meeting
April 9, 1987
GAMBLING LICENSE -- Class B (Raffles, Paddlewheels, Tipboards,-
Pull-tabs)
Renewal - New License Period June 1, 1987 to May 31, 1988
VFW #5113
2544 Commerce Blvd.
Mound, Minn. 55364
THIS APPLICATION WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE CHARITABLE GAMBLING
CONTROL BOARD AND IF APPROVED BY THE BOARD WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE
30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF RECEIPT (3-23-87), UNLESS A RESOLUTION
OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY IS PASSED WHICH SPECIFICALLY DIS-
ALLOWS SUCH ACTIVITY AND A COPY OF THAT RESOLUTION IS RECEIVED
BY THE CHARITABLE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE
ABOVE DATE.
OTHER GAMBLING LICENSES IN MOUND ARE:
Class A - American Legion #398
Our Lady of the Lake
Class B - Northwest Tonka Lions
4 times a year - no license needed then -- Westonka Senior's
A. THOMAS WURST.
CURTIS A. PEARSON.
UAMr.,5 D* I.~.RSON, P.A.
THOMAS F. UNDERWOOD. P.A.
CRAIG M. HERTZ
ROGER d. FELLOWS
LAW
WURST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & ME:RTZ
I100 FIRST SANK PEAGe
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
338.4EO0
Ms. Liz Jensen
2684 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
January 28, 1987 .,./z'~ '
Defense and Indemnity of City Council
Members, Employees, and Appointed Officials
Re:
Dear Liz:
At the Council meeting on January 27, you inquired about
how Council members and/or City employees are defended if they
are sued. In many cases they are, of course, defended .by the
insurance carrier for the City, but there may be occasions wh'ere
the insurance company denies coverage. Under Minnesota law
Section 466.07., the City Council of any City may defend, save
harmless, 'and indemnify any of its officers or employees, whether
elected or appointed, against any tort, claim, demand, whether
groundless or otherwise, arising out of an alleged act or omission
occurring in the performance of their duties. Under the same
statute, the City shall indemnify and provide a defense for any
employee subject to certain limitations set forth in the tort
liability act..
Because this is a major concern to many commissioners and
elected or appointed people, ! drew a specific ordinance for
another City to relieve the commissioners of these fears and,
in effect, to make it a responsibility of the City to do what
the statute implies that they may. I am enclosing a copy of
that ordinance which has been in effect in Brooklyn Park since
1979. Fortunately, to date we have had no claims which have
required the City Attorney to defend Council members or com-
missioners. I am copying Ed Shukle on this letter and sending
him a copy of the ordinance, and you may wish to discuss it with
him, and if you like the idea we could put it in ordinance form
for Mound and incorporate it into the City Code.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.
CAP:ih
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Ed Shukle
City Attorney
Section
S'ec'l: ion 201:100.
Defense and Indemnificat'ion of Officers and
~ployees of the City.
Subd. 1. Purpose. In recent years there has been a loss
of sovereign immunity for municipal functions and employees
and a trend has developed wherein municipalities, their
officers, employees and agents have been joined in litiga-
tion and a number of these lawsuits have been filed naming
officers, employees and agents individually in lawsuits.
As a result of this ~rend in the law, it becomes more
difficult to obtain the services of citizens who are re-
luctant to volunteer for service in muni6ipal government
and to assume individual liability when acting in behalf
of the City. City council members, employees end officers
are in the normal course of events participants in many
controversial decisions which result in litigation and
~bject the individuals to concern regarding personal
liability.
It is the purpose of this ordinance to 'unequivocally state
that the City of Brooklyn Park will protect its City
officials elected or appointed, includin~ members of the
Plannin~ Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals, Park and
Recreation Commission, and other Commissions appointed by
the City Council in performing their duties to promote the
public health, safety and general welfare. Public officia.~
must be in a position to make decisions when they are
needed and to act to implement decisions of the City
Council. Action on controversial subjects and implementin~
policy decisions can and will result in errors on the part
of an employee or an elected or appointed official, and it
is determined that it is better that said officials act and
risk some error and possible injury from such actions rather
than not to act at all.
The public health, safety and general welfare will be pro-
moted and p~eserved by providing assurances to these
individuals that they will be supported by the municipality
in carrying out their official duties.
Subd. 2. Defense and Indemnification. The City shall
defend, save harmless and indemnify any of its officers and
employees, whether elected or appointed, and specifically
including members of its advisory commissions, against any
tort, claim or demand, whether groundless or otherwise,
arisin~ out of an alleged act o-TM omission occurring in the
performance of their duty. This responsibility to defend
and indemnify does not apply in cases of malfeasance in
office or willful or wanton neglect of duty.
Section 201:100 added by Ordinance #1979-310(A)'
Section 201:100
Sub~. ~
Subd. ~. Def'ens'e COunsel. The City Council wall designate
the City At+.orney o~ legal counsel representing an insurance
carrier for the City to defend the City's employees and
officers against all ~uch lawsuits wherein ~he employee or
officer is individually named as a defend---hr. The'Ci=y
shall continue to represent the employee or officer if the
decision is appealed to a higher court, or the City Council
may authorize the appeal of any decision against the officer
or employee to a higher court.
Subd. ~. Right to P~sonal' chun'se!. The provisions of this
Section of t4e admlnis~rative code shall not supersede of
preclude the o. fficer's or employee's right to r. etain at.his
own expense hms personal legal counsel to provmde for hms
defense. The determination as to whether ~o use the City's
legal counsel, for which the City shall be responsible for
defense costs, or whether the officer or employee chooses to
use his own individual counsel at his own expense, shall be
at his option, and if the official selects his own attorney,
this shall relieve the City from all present and future
obligations as they relate to any defense'or indemnification
of the officer or employee for the alleged tort, claim or
demand ·
Section 201:100 added by 0~dinance #197 9-310 (A) ~
WESTONKA INTERVENTION PROJECT
FUNDING REQUEST TO THE CITY OF MOUND
FOR THE MOUND DOMESTIC ASSAULT
INTERVENTION PROJECT
History
In November of 1984 the Westonka Intervention Project for domestic
violence began servicing the cities of Mound and Minnetrista. Westonka
Intervention Project began because of a need expressed by some 15 professionals,
who work with families in the Westonka area, to do something about domestic
violence. Healthcare providers, police officers, ministers, social workers,
teachers and human service personnel were a11 overwhelmed with the many cases
of domestic violence they encountered through their work with clients. A
steering committee was formed to research as to what exactly, if anything, could
be done to curtail this overwhelming problem. The Westonka Intervention Project
was born as a result of this research.
During the first two years of operation 237 families have been helped through
interventions and support service. Many more people have gained a better under-
standing and awareness of the problem of domestic violence through Westonka
Intervention Project's community outreach. This was accomplished through l0
speaking engagements, a distribution of some 400 brochures telling of services
available to victims of domestic viol'ence and 6 in service training sessions
for volunteers.
In November, 1985, the project 'received its' tax exempt non-profit license.
The project has been operating ~olely on volunteers and minimal funding.
Organization Information
The Westonka Intervention Project is a community based, non-profit
corporation. It is presently working with the police departments of Mound and
Minnetrista which service some 12,900 people. Because the cities so closely
border one another these police departments often work as a team. The use of
the Westonka Intervention Project is policy for both police departments.
The Westonka Intervention Project is the result of our communities commitment
to provide needed services to its people. Through a study conducted by the
West Hennepin Human Services planning board, it has been noted that Mound is
actually a center for human services for many of the Western commUnities. In
order to meet the needs of their many clients, the Human Service Programs network
provides support to one another. The Westonka Intervention Project is an integral
part of this networking, working closely with the Community Education Program,
health centers, Mound and Minnetrista police departments, city officials, the
Mound Westonka School District, W~ston Christian Services, Chrysalis, and
West Hennepin Human Services planningboard.
Staff Positions.
Reporting to the Board of Directors (see attachment No. l) are
one volunteer director and one administrative secretary volunteer. There
are presently twenty volunteer crisis advocates, who provide key information
to victims and assailants of domestic violence.
Westonka Intervention Project Description
In the past 5 years community based advocacy groups have had a
significant impact on chan§ing the focus of police and courts in their involvement
with domestic assault. New laws have been introduced which gives a clear message
that battering is no longer a "family matter" but a crime and a concern of the
entire community. Police have been given the authority to arrest assailants
without witnessing the incident, provided they have probablecause to believe an
assault did occur.
Community groups throughout the state, such as Duluth, Marshall, St. Cloud,
Eagan and locally in Brooklyn Center, Plymouth, Golden Valley, Hopkins and
St. Louis Park have initiated and or planning intervention projects. The
advocacy work already accomplished in these communities with local probation
officers and court systems will benefit the development of the Westonka
Intervention Project.
The Westonka Intervention Project was organized in November, 1984, to
develop a cooperative effort by existing agencies (police, courts, shelters,
and services to victims and batterers) in order to maximize the success of
comunity intervention in domestic assault cases and violations of Orders of
Protection. The purpose of the Westonka Intervention Project is to see our
community develop a consistent intervention process with abusers that protects
victims by providing external controls, on the violence until alternative
behaviors are learned by the assailants. Both the victims of domestic violence
and the community benefit from this program.
The Westonka Intervention Project is the first program in the Mound Westonka area
to develop an effective response to the victims of domestic violence. No similar
program exists in the area.
The following organizations know of the work done through the Westonka Intervention
Project and provide similar or complementary services. However, they are not
affiliated with the Westonka project. They are:
West Hennepin Human Services
Sojourner Shelter
Home Free Shelter
Southwestern Valley Alliance
Phoenix
Perspectives
Mound and Minnetrista Police Departments
Domestic Abuse Project
Chrysalis Center for Women
Mound Community Services
Social Work Office, Mound Schools
Tonka Alano
Westonka Christian Services
St. joseph's House
How the Project Operates
When the Mound or Minnetrista Police Departments make an arrest in
a domestic assault call, the police diSpatch calls the primary volunteer cris)s
advocate on a beeper. Advocates work either a day (8:00am-5:OOpm) or night
(5:00pm-8:OOam) shift. The primary advocate contacts his/her partner and they
go to the home of the victim to offer support, safety and legal options. The
advocate is trained to provide key information and assist the victim through
the process of prosecution. The advocate gives continued support if an Order
of Protection is obtained or not. Whenever possible, the assailant is also
informed of the consequences he now faces and the treatment programs available
to help him change his behavior.
The Mound and Minnetrista Police Chiefs have committed their departments to
this intervention process. The police response includes: clear departmental
guidelines on arresting when probably cause exists; contacting the Westonka
Intervention Project when an arrest is made; referring victims to the project
even if an arrest has not been made.
The Westonka Intervention Project arranges child care and transportation when-
ever necessary in order to maximize the accessibility of court services for
victims. The project will escort victims and offenders to support groups.
Arrangements and transportation to shelters, hospitals and housing is 'also
provided. '
Evaluation
The coordination of each agencies efforts in supporting the victim
and assailant, the exchange of information between agencies and the client and,
finally, the monitoring of agency policies and individual abusers compliance
with court orders is an important step in our community. Data collected from
the Duluth Intervention Program demonstrates the potential effect of this project:
arrests in Duluth have increased five fold; conviction rates have increased
from 20% to 80% of all arrests; and; 60% of abusers arre§ted under the program
did not batter again in the next year. Data from Westonka Intervention Project's
past two years of community service has shown that police have less reported
calls on domestics, victims are seeking help sooner, and through counseling and
support services, families are able to stay together while resolving their
problems.
Goals and Objectives
The Westonka Intervention Project is operating under the belief
that violence against any family member is a violation of their rights as
human beings. Westonka Intervention Project believes that it is possible to
stop much of the.family violence that is happening in our community through
intervention. The Westonka Intervention Project places the responsibility for
intervention in domestic assault on the police and criminal justice system
rather than'the victim.
The primary goals of the project are to develop an effective community response
toward battering by the legal and social services in the Mound and Minnetrista
areas.
The objectives are as follows:
1. An increase in the percentage of probably cause arrests made
by the Mound and Minnetrista Police Departments.
2. A reduction in repeated police involvement with families
involved in our projects.
3. Community education about domestic violence.
4. In misdemeanor assault cases, an increase in the use of
treatment for abusive behavior.
4. An increase in the use of support groups for the victims.
Proposed Yearly Budget if Funding were Available.
Salary $9,120.00
.5 Coordinator
Grant Writer $2,400.00
(professional 40 hrs at $60.00 per hour)
House Lease $1,500.00 per month
(office, shelter, support groups)
Copy Maching $1,800.00
(rebuilt)
Annual Business Telephone charge $1,000.00
Printing $ 350.00
(Brochures, business cards, froms and training materials)
Program Expenses $ 500.00
(Film and video purchases, speakers for training consultants)
Postage $ 154.00
Mileage $ 400.00
(Volunteers and Project Coordinator)
Equipment $2,000.00
(lO beepers at $16.00, batteries for 1 year)
Child Care $1,000.00
(Victims and Advocates)
Future
Since the Mound, Minnetrista and Orono police work so closely
together the WEstonka Intervention Project intends to expand the project
to include the City of Orono. The project will be seeking funding for a
shelter and paid staff personnel.
Westonka Intervention Project Fund Sources for 1987
Westonka Crime Fund $100.00
Barb Thompford $125.00
St. Johns Women's Club $500.00
American Legion Womens Auxilary $100.00
Our Request
Westonka Intervention Project is in need of many items that are
one time purchase and will not make us dependent on any one source of funding.
However, there are other items such as a paid staff and a shelter which would
need funding annually in order to continue. However, if funding were completely
cut, it is better the project did give service than not having existed at all.
/ 00.2.
One only needs to ask the families that have already been helped. Before
Westonka Intervention Project the potential of a healthy change in these
same families would have been very low.
In Summation
1. This budget is comparable to existing intervention projects
for domestic violence.
2. After studying similar budgets and their requests of our
neighboring cities, Westonka Intervention Projects proposal to the city was
written.
3. Cities served, usually, are the main source of funding for
these programs.
I0o
DIRECTORS RESPONSIBILITIES
1. Administrate over advocates
2. Training of our advocates.
3. Public awareness.
4. Support to advocates through regular meetings°
5. Victim support and follow-up.
6. Advocate scheduling.
7. Communication with City Officials.
8. Meeting with Board of Directors.
9. Networking with Hennepin County and Battered Women's Programs.
lO. Record keeping of victim reports.
11. Fund-raising.
12. Victim Referrals
WESTONKA INTERVENTION PROJECT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Daniel Hessburg (President)
Brad Roy (Vice President) Mound Police Officer
Mary Hurley (Treasurer) Director of Mound G.E.D. program
Phyllis Jessen - Mound Council Member
Dr. Jay Peterson - Local Optician
Dr. Brian Jenjum - Local General Practitioner
Dr. Ernie Swihart - Local Pediatrician
Eric Gustafson - Minister, St. John's Lutheran Church
Michael Woelffer - Minnetrista Resident
James B. Dickinson - Lawyem
IOoE
GEN OLSON
Senator 43rd District
132C State Office Building
st. Paul, Minnesota 55155
(612) 296-1282
H o me:
6750 County Road 110 West
Mound, Minnesota 55364
(612) 472-3306
Senate
State of Minnesota
March 9, 1987
Val Hessburg
3490 Lythrum Way
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Val:
I enjoyed visiting with you and the Shirley Hills students
when you visited the Capitol. I hope you found the experience
both educational and enjoyable.
I was pleased to read about your and Dan's involvement with
the Westonka Intervention Project in the Westonka Sailor.
The approach you are ~using to help solve the problem of inter-
family abuse is a good one. Please know that your efforts
are most appreciated.
Best wishes for continued success in all your many endeavors.
Sincerely,
Gon Olson
State Senator
GO/bk
COMMITTEES · Education · Local and Urban Government · Energy and Housing
SERVING: Deephaven, Eden Prairie (portions of), Excelsior, Greenwood, Long Lake, Minnetonka
(portions of), Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Mound, Orono, St. Bonifacius, Shorewood, Spring
Park, Tonka Bay and Woodland
PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT
Public Safety Offices
7701 County Road 110 West
Minnetrista, Minnesota 55364
612.446.1131
February 2, 1987
Craig A. Anderson
Chief of Police
Police/Fire/Ambulance
Emergency: 911
Dispatcher.' 544-9511
Crime Stoppers: 45-CRIME
Valerie Hessburg
Director
Westonka Intervention Project
PO Box 34
Hound, ~ 55364
REs LETTER OF SUPPORT
Dear Director Hessburg:
It has come to my attention that the Westonka Intervention Project is
in need of funding in order to contihue providing assistance to victims
of family violence in our communities. On behalf of the St. Bonifacius
and.Hinnetrista Public Safety Department, I want you Co know we whole-
heartedly support the efforts of the project and.encourage citizens,
community organizations and businesses to provide financial support.
The proJecc has~ played a major role in assisting victims of family
violence. A family crisis brings out deep emotion% when violence becomes
a part of that crisis scars are left that may last a lifetime. This is
when the Westonka Intervention ~dvocates are called upon. They are ready
and willing to respond on a 24-hour basis. I believe because of the
project's ability to respond during this critical time, victims have been
able to find the help they need. Without the project our communities
will lose these special people, the Advocates. When those victims cry
out for help, who will respond?
Law enforcement will always take care of the immediate concern, but the
follow-up is when the band-aid is removed and the true healing process
takes place.
I trust that once the community becomes aware of the project's goals,
objective and accomplishments, the financial crisis the project is
facing will be resolved.
"SEE IT, HEAR IT, REPORT IT"
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-37~ 1
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-~
EMERGENCY 911
January 22, 1987
Mrs. Valerie Hessburg
3490 Lythrum Hay
Minnetrista, MN 55364
Re: Westonka Intervention Program
Dear ValeFie,
I am writing this letter in support of the Westonka Intervention Program.
During the year of 1986, the Mound Police responded to 101 domestic
situations. In 59 of those domestics there was a reported assault that
had taken place.
The availability of the intervention counselors greatly reduces the
amount of time officers are needed at the scene. Officers can clear the
scene with the knowledge that an intervention counselor will be making a
contact with the victim and offering assistance. The counselors are
very knowledgeable in services available ana are able to offer infor-
mation to victims needing further help.
The Westonka Intervention Program offers a very worthwhile and needed
service to the citizens of Mound; and I thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
{
Len Harrell, Chief
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
LH/sh
1984 thru..~986 Westonka Intervention statistics
Married women with children ............ 138
Married women without children ............ 22
Single women with children ............ 33
Single women without children ............ 30
Marri6d men with children ............ 5
Married men without children~ ........... 2
Sibblings ............ 3
Total assisted ............ 233
BILLS .APRIL 1/4, '1987
Batch 87/4033
Batch 87/403/4
Computer Run dated q/3/87
Computer Run dated /4/9/8.7'
33,715./43
92,998.97
Brad Landsman Relmb for hdwe-flre dept
First Trust St. Paul Bank Bond fee
Hart!ns 66 Auctlon proceeds
Reserves Htg costs
13.92
/438.75
2,172.20
30./46
TOTAL BI LLS
129,369.73
/oll
Z
0
¥
~ T
~.~
I I
I !
of,-
I-- I.--
NN
(:30
I--I--
oJoJ
h
Z
0
(..I
h
0000
ZZZ~I
0000
ZZZZ:
0000[
0000
i ,
~¢d
bJ tlJ LIJ UJ
a) o0~Dffi ,o o,
· -o(u o coco
ZZZZ
::3
Z
0
,.,J bJ
..J I-.
13: LU Z
< 0 0
0000
ZZZZ
0000
0000
I!
.!
ZZ
Z
0
'r:
),.:
I-,
oo
ZZZZZZ
w
W
UJ
Z
0
:11 I I I I I I I I I II
000000~000~0
!1111111911111
I
t~l LIJ LIJ
niL. O.
000
000
I
!
:1
ZZZZ
~o
0000
~Z'ZZ
0000
ZZZZ
0000
ZZZZ' Z
I.IJ ~ L~J LIJ Z
Z~'ZZ
>.. }- >., >-
I-- I-- I-- I--
I !
Oo
O0
LIJ
fi.
I-
~ r
oo
oo
I~ I
'~r~r
Mr,1
ooooooooo
ooooooooo
ooooooooo
0
-r
0
o~, ~
~al7
I I !/ I
e
4~
oo ·
Ii Ii
!
o
bJ
I
gJ
0
UJ
UJ
Z
D.
LIJLIJLIJ
m.r..a.
14
Z
UJ
z
0
b_
o
>-
u
0
Z
'r
UJ
ul
4~
0
00000
00000
MMMMM
Z
0
X
~,.
UJ
Z
,.J
I-
0
oo
oo
I
>-
0
0
o
I.
...i
0JOJ
0~0~
oo
4:<:
ZZ
ooo
oUI~
I
!41'
010 41'
000
000
mLnLn
I
I
hi
ZZ ZZ
LUUJ
oo
~w
Z
UJ
U,I
-ir'
U
h,
a
Z
oo
oo
tl,
O0
O0
O0
mm
oo
:
bJ
Z
0
I--
i!l~
0
o o
2[2[
o
o
I
Z
0
bJ
MMMMMMMMMM
Iii I I
000000000000000000000000000
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
CITY OF ~0UHD
Mound, Minnesota
CASE NO. 87-623
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ISSUANCE OF
A CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT FOR THE OPERATION
OF A FAST FOOD, CONVENIENCE, DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT (CLASS II)
LOCATED AT 2330 WlLSHIRE BOULEVAR0
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that.on'T~esday~Ap.rll 28, 1987, at 7:30 P.M. at
the City Hall, $3ql May~ood .Road,.Mound, Minnesota,.a. hearing will be
held on the issuance-of a conditlonal, use permit for the establishment
of a C. lass II'.restaurant at 2330 Wilshire Boulevard. The proposed U~e
consists of a Oomlno'~ Pizza, Inc. restaurant offering delivery and
take-out food..
All persons.appearing at said hearing wI'l~l be given the opportunity to
be heard. '.'
Francene C. Ci-ark, Citf Clerk
April 14, 1987
RESOLUTION NO. 87-
RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MA~OR AND THE CIT~
MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH
THE MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW
-. ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 320
POLICE PATROLMEN
WHEREAS, the City Manager has negotiated a new two year
Union Contract with the Police Patrolmen; and
WHEREAS, said contract would be in effective January 1,
1987 through December 31, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize and direct
the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into a labor agreement
with the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees
Union, Local 320 (Police Patrolmen) to be effective January 1,
1987 through December 31, 1988. Copy of same is on file in the
Office of the City Clerk.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
,~ The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 87-
RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER
TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH THE LAW
ENFORCEMENT LABOR SER¥ICE, INC., LOCAL 35
LELS POLICE SUPERVISOR/SERGEANTS
WHEREAS, the City Manager has negotiated a new two year
Union Contract with the Police Supervisor/Sergeants; and
WHEREAS, said contract would be effective January 1,
]987 through December 3], ]988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize and direct
the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into a labor agreement
with the Law Enforcement Labor Service, Inc., Local 35 (Police
Supervisor/Sergeants) to be effective January ], ]987 through
December 3], ]988. Copy of same on file in the Office of the
City Clerk.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
ooo
1
75 YEARS
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYVVOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
April 7, 1987
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Ed Shukle, City Manager
Fran Clark, City Clerk
March Monthly Report
There were two regular Council meetings in March. There was
preparation for those meetings and then there were the minutes,
26 resolutions and items that need to be handled after the
meetings. These items can take.alot of time to complete.
I prepared Garden Leases for the three people in'town who use
City lots for their gardens. This keeps-these lots neat and
clean and not used as a dumping area.
I continued to work on the tax forfeit parcels and they will be
coming to the Council for dispostion in April.
The final touches were finally put on the property Nell Weber
wishes to purchase to gain access to the property he already owns
and that will be on the Council Agenda in April.
'We continue to receive calls from citizens requesting information
on vacant property that abutts their property. One such call was
on a parcel of land on the corner of Dorcester and Tuxedo Blvd.
In checking I found that there are two lots. Both were taken for
street and utility purposes. Only one lot was needed. The other
needed only a storm sewer easement and then could be released to
be sold to the adjoining property owner. This will be on the
Council Agenda in April.
There is also a City owned parcel across from Grimm's Grocery
that will be on the Agenda in April to be sold. This is half of
Lot 16, Block 1~, Arden and was taken for street purposes when.
Tuxedo Blvd. was under construction. We will still need to keep
30 feet that fronts on Brighton Blvd. for possible future
expansion of that road, but we can sell the other portion which
will help the property owner. This item will be a little easier
because the City actually owns this property outright. It will
be on the April Agenda.
Page 2
March Monthly Report
April 7, 1987
I had one meeting with Hennepin County on the new Optic Scan
voting equipment. We completed a finished draft of equipment
procedures. In April we will work on an election judges training
manual.
The Minnesota Clerks' and Finance Officers' Association had their
annual conference from March 17-20. This was the 50th Anniversay
of the association so some special activities were planned. We
honored all the retired City Clerks. Barbara Heyman, past City
Clerk in Mound, was present at the Banquet and received a
Proclamation from the President of the Association. I was
secretary of that association until this conference when I was
elected Vice-President. Being Secretary, I had certain duties
that had to be done for the conference, i.e. contact and line up
vendors for Vendor Night, get all the Minutes which I wrote for
the past year printed, wrote and had printed the Proclamations
that was presented to all retirees. The Conference was attended
by 265 of the 565 members of the association. We had sessions on
the following:
1. Optical Scan Technology
2. Data Privacy
3. Election Laws
4. Gambling Laws
5. LegislatiVe Update
6. Round Table discussions with other Clerks
7. Managing Stress
8. Performance Management
9. Enhancing Organizational Effectiveness
to name a few. This conference is put on by the University of
Minnesota Department of Professional Development and Conference
Services. It is designed to meet the needs of Minnesota clerks
from large and small cities, with different responsibilities, and
with varying years of experience. The sessions provide practical
information and an opportunity for discussion with other clerks.
I notified the Fire Contract cities of their total fire and
rescue hours for 1986 and the percentage that will be
incorporated into the. formula for figuring the 1988 Fire
Contract.
There are always numerous phone calls and questions from the
residents.
fc
75 YEARS
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
April 9, 1987
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
City Manager
Greg Skinner
Water & Sewer Supt.
March's Activity Report
In Ma~ch we pumped 19,350,000 gallons, there were 3 new accounts,
2 turn-ons, 0 watermain breaks and 36 final readings. With road
restrictions on this month construction was way down. We spent time
in pumphouse 7 where we have had some problems with electrical
equipment. We changed out the water meter at Lakewinds replacing
the old 3" gear driven compound to a new 3" turbo. Our last pickup
has arrived and is in service. Have also spent time on the Allied
painting case, court was a real treat.
SEWER DEPT.
Sewer Department had one back-up this month with no major damage'.
The crew spent time working in the 29 lift stations.
75 YEARS
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
April 9, 1987
TO:. Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Joyce Nelson
SUBJECT: March's Recycling
During the month of March I've been working on the annual report for
Hennepin County. In this report they want total cost of program,
publicity strategies'used and copies of publicity materials, tonnage
of material, participation rates, and any other recycling activities
(such as church-sponsored or Boy Scout paper drives).
For the year of 1986 225.94 tons of material was recycled from this
area. Hennepin County as estimated that our total waste generated
from this area is 3,862 tons. Hennepin County wanted us to recycle
4 percent of this or 154 tons, so as you can see we did better than
expected, we recycled 6 percent of our waste generated.
Also during March I was working on the tonnage payment program from
Met. Council. Met Council will reinburse cities $4.00 per ton of
recycled material picked up. From October 1, 1986 ~hru March 31, 87
the City recycled71.30 tons of material or $285.20./'
March's pick-up was 12.82
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
April 6, 1987'
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
City Manager
Geno Hoff
Street Supt.
March's Activity Report
On Sunday March 1st we got about an 1" of snow during the night. I checked
the streets at 6:30 a.m. I thought they were OK, I also called the police
on the city radio and checked with them to see if they received any complaints
about slippery roads, they didn't. About 9:30 a.m. the police called and
said they received a complaint from the Fire Dept. that the roads were
slippery. I called out the sanding crew immediately, we checked every
street and didn't find much to sand. The next day we got a number of
complaints, why we the City crew out sanding when it wasn't necessary.
That goes to show you, your damned if you do and damned if you don't.
The Street crew spent some time this month working on equipment. It takes
about a week to get our sweepers and tankers ready for the spring clean-up.
We dismantled the snowblower on the 20th and replaced it with the sidewalk
broom. The 23rd we started to clean sidewalks. The 29th the street
sweepers were on the road. The downtown, area is first, Commerce, Shoreline,
Lynwood, Wilshire, Cypress and Bartlett, from there we moved to Three Points,
we finished that area on Friday the 27th. We had some cold weather move in
over the weekend, so we're on hold until it warms up.
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS
We had to do some plumbing repairs on the blue tanker, also a pancake blew
out of the brake system. 4 new tires for the sweepers, 2 new sprockets
and drive chain for the main broom, also new wheel bearing. These repairs
were for the old sweeper
An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of ~;ace, color, national origin, or handicapped status
in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities.
Page 2
SIGN DEPT.
We moved our signs into the old Island Park Hall because we just didn't
have enough room in the garage. We are using about t/3 of the floor
space now and when we get the rest of the Christmas Decorations it will
be about 3/4 filled. In the porcess of moving the signs we checked
inventory and discarded a number of damaged and non-regulation signs.
STREET MATERIALS PURCHASED & TRANSPORTED
255 tons of Buckshot
April 6, 1987-
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO:
Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Greg Bergquist
Mechanic
SUBJECT:
March's Activity Report
Thism6nth as the new replacement vehicles were delivered the older
vehicles were transferred to other departments where they could still
be effectively used and still be of service in other capacities.
These changes included Unit #1 (76 Ford Street), Unit #3 (82 Chev. 4 X 4
with plow Water) and Unit #9 (80 Chev. pick-up Sewer) these were
taken over by the Parks Department. All trucks had to be stripped
of lights, radios, tools, etc and installed in the new equipment.
Other changes included the S-10 pick-up owned by the Parks Department, this
was taken by the Police Department for their CSO truck. The old CSO
truck was given to the shop, as there was no vehi61e for this Dept.
The Street Dept. also was given an 84 Ford LTD (old 841) that was
replaced by 1 of the 2 87 Pontiacs that were bought by the Police
Dept.
In other shop work with Spring arriving it was time to bring'the
sweepers out. Without warm storage it is necessary to completely
service, as they can't be left work .ready while in storage. This
includes changing of all fluids (water, hydralic fluid, oil, filters
etc.) The 1970 Elgin sweeper received the most extensive work as
it was found that many parts were severly worn such as sprockets,
chains, etc. The Water Dept. received 2 new pick-ups, 1 4 X 4 and 1
2 wheel drive, both of which had to be set up with radios (2-way),
warning lights and tool boxes.
A new service entry door was installed in the shop as the old one
was in bad shape and had to be shot, it gave many years of service
and I know it will be missed.
]O33
An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status
in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs and activities.
TO: City Manager and Members of the C|ty Counci]
FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official
SUBJECT: March, 1987 Monthly Report
During the month of March, the. Inspection Department attended one Planning Com-
mission meeting on March 9th, two City Council meetings on March IOth and March
24th. I was scheduled for time off work the.first week of March. Marge and I
worked Saturday, March 28th, 1987 to purge files and basically clean our office
and traded time off from our regular scheduled hours. 'The following inspections
were conducted during the month of March:
* Site Inspections
32
Footing Inspections
10
Framing Inspections
Insulation Inspections
8
Drywall Inspections
9
Final Inspections
4O
Progress Inspections
21
Erosion/Grading
Moving Inspection
**Heating Inspections
15
Plumbing Inspections
15
Fire Sprinkler/Suppression
Complaints ,l~,.
TOta1 174
Monthly report was submitted to City Manager during the month of March. Zoning
reports were submitted to the Planning Commission. Two plats were reviewed with
the applicants for the City process to obtain plat approval.
Road restrictions were put on for construction vehicles on the First of March.
The larger number of final inspections made were updates on older permits that
had not been called in for final inspections. Writing of correspondence, resolu-
tions, and Planning Commission reports were sent out from the Department. Corres-
pondence received during the month were reviewed; recording was done of the sub-
stitute inspection services~ records and daily inspection logs were made.
Condemnation reports were filed with the City Prosecutor for a house in the High-
land area after vandalism of the vacant building. A report was submitted to the
March Monthly Report
April 6, 1987 - Page 2
Park Department on the cOndition of a Park building on Tyrone Road.
Meetings were held with Public Works and. Balboa Minnesota to discuss building
revisions for their floor drains to prevent, accidental spills into Morton Channel.
I attended a BUilding Inspectors lunc.h~in Medina with the topic from the State
Fire Marshal,s~Office being'"coordinatlng of the.building'and fire codes for com-
patible enforcement".
Plan review was conducted during the month for three new homes, the new Smith
Heating building, facility, Domino's Pizza, Grimm's Store, and several home addi-
tions.
Total number of building permits issued in the month of March was 16 with a valua-
tion of $272,650. A copy of the Building Activity Report is attached. The total
valuation for the year of 1987 is $1,559,706.
In addition, our Department prepared the monthly calendar 6f the April City meetings
and events.
JB/ms
Attachment
* Site inspections include the review of the Planning Commission requests and
requirements, complaints and follow-up to code compliance such as, no building
permi.t, recheck of compliance notice, review status of various sites for the
City Prosecutor, pre-construction meetings at the site for building permit appli-
cants .or realtors,, fire damage and periodic commercial inspection updates.
** The heating inspections during the construction of project are included under
the framing and final inspections of the building. The heating installations men-
tioned are for separate equipment-being plac.ed in homes and businesses. -Several
of the inspections for framing involve framing and insulation of the same structure.
$3~ 1 t~ay~ood Road Street Address
.~ound, ,N. 55~ Ct~and
" BUI~ING A~IV~
' ' ' '-" ~,.d ~a~ch ~ ~a~ ..... '
~NSIRU~ON (F~ff~'
237,500,
000.
To~a! N~n. Re~JdentlM ·
RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS
AND ALTERATIONS
Rel~dent~el
, MONTH AND
) DATE
~ONV~$1ONS
TO~II Co,lye rSlon~
ou~ Inst.
Total Dem~!.~- -~-
i 'rOT~
3q,950.
200
200.
27~,650.
i90,318.
Year t~ Dele
1
Yem Te Dill
75 YEARS
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
April 1, 1987
TO:
FROM:
RE:
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
AND CITY COUNCIL
JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER
MARCH 1987 MONTHLY REPORT
/ 37
As I anticipated our sales for the month of March were down from March
a year ago. This year March sales were $55,673. Last year March sales
were $59,484. The fact that Easter fell in March of last year, the fact
that last year at the end of March we had some unseasonably warm weather,
and the fact that last year in March we had one extra Friday's business,
all contributed to this negative discrepancy. I expect that April of
this year should conversely be far better than April of last year when
our'sales totaled $59,601.
At the end of March I hired one extra part time employee in preparation
for the upcoming spring and summer months. His name is Jori Farley.
He seems to be a courteous individual and he has been catching on to
our methods and procedures rather quickly.
March was a time for spring cleaning around the liquor store. In
addition to our regular cleaning routine we began working on washing
shelves. At this point in time, we are nearly finished with only a
couple of shelves ]eft. What a relief!
This summer, I believe, will bring an even greater sales in the area
of wine coo]ers. Wine coo]ers have been a product who's growth has
escalated tremendously over the last three years. To keep'up with this
trend, we are going to bring in even more types of coo]ers this Apri].
Our problem is space. Where do we put them? So Julie and I have been
rearranging things to expand our Wine coo]er selection. When we are
through, I know we will have the largest variety of coolers in this
vicinity and perhaps one of the most extensive sections in the Metro
area.
The MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE ASSOCIATION sent me a packet of material
dealing with the Mandatory Deposit issue. I am attaching copies of
this information along with-my report. I recommend that all of you
read it over carefully. When I presented my annual report before you
on March 24, 1987, I briefly touched upon this subject. It seemed
apparent at the time that some of you were in favor of the Mandatory
Deposit bill. Well, the Mandatory Deposit proponents have intrbduced
their bill in both houses at the last possible moment to prevent our
industry from launching a successful defense. On very shor.t notice,
Liquor Store March Report
April 1, 1~$7
Page 2
Senate File 959 has already cleared subcommittee on a tie vote,
without recommendation, but was sent forward to the full committee
by a special procedure. The Municipal Liquor Store Association suggests
we follow up with letters and City Council resolutions. The companion
bill in the house is HF 1085. Remember, under this bill we could end
up as a redemption center with all the extra costs of additional space
and employees. A very detailed legislative package is enclosed to
assist your legislative contact. If you want to remain in the retail
liquor business and provide tax free services (seal coating) for the
citizens of Mound, then I strongly urge you to do what you can to
oppose the mandatory deposit bill. Time.is critical. The next senate
hearing could be the week of April 6th.
Here is the list of the Senate Committee members:
Environment and Natural Resources (18)
Chairman: Willet Vice Chair:
Office No: 111 Telephone #
Meets: T, W, F; room 112, 1-3 PM
Members:
Berg Knaak
Bernhagen Laidlg
Dahl Larson
Davis Lessard
Frederickson, Dr.
Dahl
296-1113
Merriam
Morse
Novak
Olson
Marty
Stumpf
Wegscheid
Willet
Peterson, R.W.
JK:ls
Minnesota Industry/
Labor Recycling
Coalition
Committed to comprehensive waste management.
March 20, 1987
Dear Legislator:
Proponents of a mandatory deposit bill claim it will reduce solid
waste and use of landfills, ~help recycling programs, raise money
for the state, curb plastic bottle use, reduce litter and '
increase employment. Sound too good to be true? It is.
In reality, a deposit law would:
· reduce the solid waste stream by less than one percent, at
bes t;
· skim profitable aluminum from voluntary recycling programs,
threatening their viability;
· cost the state as much as $30 million to $60 million in
administrative costs and lost sales and excise taxes;
· not address the cause of litter;
· cause the elimination of many high-skill jobs.
In addition, mandatory deposit will raise the price of a six-pack
15 cents for soft drinks and 25 cents for beer, costing Minnesotans
$90 million a year. Lost sales due to the higher prices will
result in lost sales and excise taxes for the state. In
addition, other subsidy from the general fund is sure to be
required over and above all the revenues it might generate.
Collection is costly and unsanitary for small businesses.
The enclosed information package provides additional detail. It
also suggests responsible alternatives that focus on the real
problem -- reducing all components of the waste stream. As you
can see, mandatory deposit is a costly, ineffective approach to
comprehensive waste management. We encourage you to learn more
about it and consider its harmful consequences.
Minnesota Industry/Labor Recycling Coalition
Minnesota Industry/
Labor Recycling
Coalition
led to comprehensive waste management.
DO SUPPORTERS OF MANDATORY DEPOSITS HAVE ALL THE ANSI~IERS?
When proponents of mandatory deposit laws present their rationales
to you, here are some questions to pose to them. The answers
below' provide the facts:
Question:
What have the extra administrative and consumer costs'
been in other states with mandatory deposits?
A:
The Detroit-area Food Dealers Association has estimated the
total cost of a mandatory deposit to the Michigan economy was
$250 million in 1979 alone. In Iowa, the Des Moines Reqister
reported in August 1980 that a mandatory deposit cost Iowans
at least $20 million during its first year.
Question:
A:
After we pay administrative costs, how much revenue
will really be left -- or could this cost the state
money?
After deducting administrative costs and sales tax losses
from the anticipated $10 million the state hopes to collect,
Minnesota could suffer a net loss of as much as $34 million
to $60 million.
Question:
How much did forced deposits raise consumer costs in
the nine states with deposit laws?
A:
On average, mandatory deposit laws in nine states raised
beer prices by 25 cents per six-pack and soft drink prices
by 15 cents per six-pack-- not incl-uding the deposit or
handling fee.
'Question=
How many beverage container manufacturing jobs do we
have in Minnesota?
A:
In glass and can manufacturing there are about 1500 jobs
that could be negatively affected or eliminated by a mandatory
depos i t.
Question:
How much have mandatory deposits reduced solid waste
in states with such laws?
A:
According to the Metropolitan Council, the range in
applicable states is a 3-8% reduction in solid waste.
-2-
Question:
If aluminum cans, the most profitable recycling
component, leave the collection chain, won't this kill
voluntary recycling programs?
A~
Yes, since aluminum cans are the "gold" in the waste stream
they subsidize the recycling of less profitable materials
such as newspapers.
Question:
With a 10-cent deposit plus added handling
will we stop Minnesotans from crossing the
purchases?
costs, how
border for
A:
We can't. Moreover, it will be very dif. ficult and costly to
maintain enforcement measures to keep M~nnesotans fr.om
redeeming bags of containers including cans and bottles
purchased in other states.
Question:
Is it constitutional for the state to keep unredeemed
depos i ts?
A~
It certainly raises serious legal questions. No other state
with a mandatory deposit keeps the forfeited redemption
money. Rather, the money goes back into the collection and
distribution system to offset increased handling costs.
Que s ti on:
How many times have restrictive container bills been
introduced in the Minnesota Legislature-- but not
passed?
A:
From 1955 through 1986, 48 bills have been introduced in the
legislature and all were ultimately rejected as unworkable or
i neff ect i ye.
Question:
If we truly want to reduce the waste stream, why
aren't paper, plastic containers and steel cans
addressed so that we have a comprehensive waste
reduction program?
A~
This is a good question -- we'd like to hear the answer
ours elves I
dinnesota Industry/
'abor Rec fcling
oalition
to comprehensive waste management.
~..RE~S ~,AT OTHER STATES HAVE FOUND OUT ABO~T
MANDATORY DEPOSIT LAb'S
.__ · ..... ,.._.. v~.v ,it.,~_ a shortaue of space and a surplus of
cTonc~°r~ga~eU~ a~'w~n~ a~nst the s~ate's bottle law, which was
unca ped 10 weeks ago. And numerous side effects of the law have-
cauah~t people off guard, especially, be.e.r .dri.nkers; who are now
paying ~s much as 25 percent more ~or gnelr Drew.
-- Boston Globe
"The Bottle Law already has been proved a flop, .a mess,, an
on us all, a costly folly and a revelatlon of the
as s au1 t . . ~
nonsense of the whole zdea that led to zts passage.
-- Lowell, Massachusetts Sun
"Beer sales have dropped 50 to 60 percent in some
Massachusetts liquor stores whose customers have
fled across the New H~mpshire border to avoid
5-cent per bottle deIx)sits-"
-- Boston Herald-American
"The ~bottle lawt cost Iowans at least
$20 million during its first year -- and
that is a conservative 'estimate."
-- Des Moines Register
"This is the most ex~ensive, least '
efficient anti-litter tax in world
history. '
-- New York Daily News
IN MINNESOTA, LET tS LEARN FROM THE EXPERIENCES OF OTHER STATES.:
MANDATORY DEPOSIT LA~3 ARE COSTLY ADMINISTRATIVE NIGHTMARES I
'Minnesota Industry/
Labor Recycling
Coalition
Committed ~o comprehensive waste management.
Coalition Members
M~nnesota Grocers Association
Minnesota Agri-Growth Association
Minnesota Soft Drink Association
Minnesota Beer Wholesalers Association
Minnesota Licensed Beverage Association
Minnesota Municipal Liquor Stores Association
Minnesota Brewers Association
Cold Spring Brewing Company
G. Heileman Brewing Company
August Schell Brewing Company
The Stroh Brewery Company
Miller Brewing Company
Adolph Coors Company -
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry_
United Steel Workers of America Local 7796-2127
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
'District 77 (Eag. an)
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
District 924 (Mankato)
Minnesota D.R.I .V.E.
Glass Packaging Institute
Anchor Glass Container
Can Manufacturers Institute
Minnesota Wine and Spirits Wholesalers
Sunny Hill (Hibbing)
Ed Phillips & Sons
Johnson Brothers, Inc.
Quality Wine & Spirits, Inc.
Griggs-Co.oper, Inc.
Bellboy Corporation
The Wine Institute
The Beer Institute
Minnesota Industry/
Labor Recyclin§
Coalition
to comprehensive waste management.
MANDATORY DEPOSIT: REVENUE GAIN OR DRAIN?
Will the State of Minnesota really gain $10 m~11[on a year
unredeemed beverage containers? In reality, a mandatory deposit
will drain from $34 million to $60 million annuall.y from the
state treasury, making a deposit law a hidden tax increase for
every Minnesotan.
BEST CASE SCENARIO*
REVENUE EXPENSES
WORST CASE SCENARIO*
REVENUE EXPENSES
$64 ¢400 ~,000
$Tr000w000
57,000,000
5% of con-
tainers are]
not redeeme~
REVE~S:
$7,000,000
~41r400rO00
$35,000,000
Low range
operating
cost .for 600
redemption
centers
$2,500,000
Non'deposit
redemptions
$1,100,000
$55,000,000
High range
operating
cost.for 900
redemption'
centers
$4,200,000
Administratn.
costs with
pr ot ect i OhS
agai ns t
non- depos i t
redemptions
$4,000,000
Lost sales/
excise taxes
Administratn.
$2,8oo,ooo I I of con- [ $1,2oo,ooo.
Lost sales/ ! [ tainers_ are ] IN°n--de.p~.sl~
xcise taxes [ ! not redeemec~ I reoemp=zon
e TOTAL " ' T~AL ' ~ TOTAL
EXPENSES ~ REVENUES ~ EXPENSES
$41,400,000
NET STATE LOSS: (~;34r400,000)
$4,200,000
$64,400,000
STATE LOSS: (~60 ~200 r 000,)
*A detailed cost analysis of the proposed mandatory de. posit in
Minnesota conducted by Harold O. Davidson, former senzor
consultant for Arthur Young on beverage industry and
collection/distribution problems and now principal of Davidson &
Associates, forms the basis for the best and worst case scenarios.
Minnesota Industry/
Labor Recycling
COalition
Committed to comprehensive waste management.
MINNESOTAtS I~ECYCLING SOLUTION IS WORKING STATEWIDE
In. Minnesota today, a comprehensive waste management program is
strong and active across the state.
METROPOLITAN I~ECYCLING PROGRAMS
Since 1980, Minnesota Soft Drink (MSD) Recycle has processed
more than 33,000 tons of beverage cans and glass containers.
The program has paid recyclers over $6 million.
· MSD Recycle also services over 35 in-store reverse vending
machines at over 30 locations in the Twin Cities.
· Since 1986, Super Cycle has processed more than 700 tons
of residential recyclables frown curbsides per month.
In Ramsey County, 75% of households will receive curbside
pickup of recyclable materials this year.
In Minneapolis; collection of recyclable materials is
available to 100% of households.
GREATER MINNESOTA RECYCLING P~
The Minnesota Recycling Directory, distributed by the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency, was the source of the following
i hf ormat i on:
· Recycling programs are active in approximately 225'
communities in 73 counties outside the Twin Cities.
· Across greater Minnesota, there are about 450 recycling.
centers and drop boxes.
· The largest outstate ~opulation centers are well represented
with recycling sites:
-- Alexandria: 7 sites
-- Austin: 12
-- Brainard: 7
-- Duluth: 9
-- Faribault/Northfield: 13
-- International Falls: 5
-- Mankato/New Ulm: 12
-- Marshall: 4 sites
-- Owatonna: 10
-- Red Wing/Cannon Falls: 11
-- Rochester: 13
-- St. Cloud: 13
-- Thief River Falls: 4
-- Winona: 6
Minnesota Industry/
Labor Recycling
'Coalition
to comprehensive waste management.
March 20, 1987
Dear Legislator:
Proponents of a mandatory deposit bill claim it will reduce solid
waste and use of landfills, help recycling programs, raise money
for the state, curb plastic bottle use, reduce litter and
increase employment. Sound too good to be true? It is.
In reality, a deposit law would:
· reduce the solid waste stream by less than one percent, at
best;
· skim profitable aluminum from voluntary-recycling programs,
threatening their viability;
· cost the state as much as $30 million to $60 million in
administrative' costs and lost sales and excise taxes;
· not address the cause of litter;
· cause the elimination of many high-skill jobs.
In addition, mandatory deposit will raise the price of a six-pack
15 cents for soft drinks and 25 cents for beer, costing Minnesotans
$90 million a year. Lost sales due to the higher prices will
result in lost sales and excise taxes for the state. In
addition, other subsidy from the general fund is sure to be
required over and above all the revenues it might generate.
Collection is costly and unsanitary for small businesses.
The enclOsed information package provides additional detail. It
also suggests responsible alternatives that focus .on the real
problem -- reducing all components of the waste stream. As you
can see, mandatory deposit is a costly, ineffective approach to
comprehensive waste management. We encourage you to learn more
about it and 'consider its harmful consequences.
Minnesota Industry/Labor Recycling Coalition
Minnesota Industry/
Labor Recycling
Coalition
Committed to comprehensive waste management.
MANDATORY DEPOSIT IS A COSTLY, INEFFECTIVE APPROACH TO~P/)
COMPREHENSIVE ~STE MANAGEMENT
A mandatory deposit law in Minnesota will only hurt consumers,
small business, industry and the state. It will not noticeably
reduce the solid waste stream or litter. But a mandatory deposit
will take money out of the state treasury and the pockets of
every Minnesota resident. It will wound small business and
eliminate jobs. It will cripple effective recycling programs
active in 80 Minnesota counties. Deposit advocates offer many
arguments for a mandatory deposit -- arguments that are
short-sighted and based on myth. The reality is quite different~
MYTH= A deposit law will dramatically reduce solid waste going
to our landfills.
REALITY= A deposit law will have almost no impact on reducing
solid waste. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
states that nationwide mandatory deposit laws would only reduce
the country's solid waste by 2 percent.
In Minnesota, the Metropolitan Council has determined that a
DEPOSIT LAW WOULD REDUCE THE TOTAL METROPOLITAN H~STE STREAM BY
LESS T~AN 1 PERCENT=
Total Beverage Container Waste and Impact
of 90% and 95% Beverage Container Redemption
3%
~ 2.69% 2.56%
2%
1%
o
o~
o~
2.42%
Total Beverage
Container Waste
95% Container
Redempt i on
90% Container
R edempt i on
(Source: Metropolitan Council)
Iv 7
Moreover, a mandatory deposit does not guarantee that recyclable
materials won't be landfilled. Vermont started a mandatory
deposit for glass, then discovered low demand for recqvered
glass. Where did many of the returned bottles go? Straight to
the landfills.
MYTH: A deposit law will help voluntary recycling programs.
REALITY: A mandatory deposit will remove aluminum, the. most
profitable commodity, from the collection chain. Skimming the
"gold" from the waste stream will cripple recycling programs in
about 80 Minnesota counties. In our state last year, consumers
recycled 60% of aluminum cans, which subsidized recycling of
paper and other lower-profit items.
M~H:
A deposit law will raise $10 million a year through
unredeemed deposits for the state.
REALITY: Minnesota could suffer a net state loss of $34 million:
The extensive administration by the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA) of the deposit program including 500-80'0 redemption
centers will quickly eat up money from unredeemed deposits -- and
may require money from the general revenue fund besidesl
Projections show that administrative expenses and lost sales and
excise taxes could take $34-60 million from the state treasury.
M~TH: A deposit law will curb plastic bottle use.
REALITY: Since a deposit law does not address plastic
containers, consumers -- out of sheer convenience -- will buy
more plastic bottles, which will end up in our landfills or be
burned. History in nine deposit states reveals a major shift
away from glass -- to plastic.
MYTH: A deposit law will substantially reduce litter.
REALITY: Mandatory deposit laws in nine states, most of which
passed the legislation for litter reduction, have had a minimal
impact on overall litter reduction even though beverage litter
was reduced.
In Oregon, urban litter dropped by only 1% Under
deposit laws. Michigan's litter control budget
actually increased by 30% -- two years after forced
deposits became law.
Minnesota legislative tours to mandatory deposit states such as
Oregon and Vermont and even' to litter control states like
Washington revealed that Minnesota was already a cleaner state.
MYTH: A deposit law will increase employment.
REALITY: Mandatory deposit laws create some low-paying jobs
to process returnables, but they also eliminate jobs of highly
skilled workers. At Anchor Glass in Shakopee, the $9 million
payroll could disappear through 400 skilled workers losing their
jobs because of deposit laws. The Brockway plant in Rosemount
closed in 1985 due largely to packaging changes caused by other
states' mandatory deposits.
EVEN MORE ENLIGHTENING IS WHAT DEPOSIT ADVOCATES DON'T SAY...
FACT: Deposit.laws raise costs for consumers.
In Minnesota, consumers could pay an extra $90 million each year
i n added
· . handling costs resulting from a mandatory deposit. Not
~ncludlng the d.eposit or handling fee, nine states with a
mandatory d.eposlt, saw beer prices rise by 25 cents per six-pack
and soft dr~nk prices by 15 cents per six-pack.
FACT: Dedicating unredeemed deposits to the state is a hidde
tax increase and it raises serious legal questions, n
In all other states, this money has stayed in the collection and
distribution system to help offset the added expenses of
.operating under, deposit laws. Nowhere else in the nation does
the state confiscate this money.
FACT: A deposit law hurts small business.
There are increased expenses at each stage of the collection .
process. Each can and bottle must be handled at both the retail
a.nd_wholesale levels, dr amati call-
WhOlesalers · ~ ..~=~ng laoor costs £or
and retailers. Also;.they must find ad.ditional space
to handle empties. And then storing returned containers
frequently creates sanitation problems, attracting roaches and
'rats to these neighborhood locations. In addition, businesses
along state borders are often negatively affected by deposit
laws. In Iowa, retail border Sales of beer fell 20% and in'
Michigan border sales of beverages plummeted 50 to 80 percent.
THE SMA~ 'ALTERNATIVE= INCREASED SUPPORT FOR RECYCLING
A mandatory deposit is not the best method for achieving
comprehensive waste management. The Metropolitan Council
states
that beverag.e containers ~are only 3% of the metropolitan waste.
Why do deposit advocates ~gnore the other 97 percent?
Beverage Container Waste as Component
of Total Metropolitan Waste Stremu
3% (Bev?rage
90% (Paper, plastics, etc.)
(Source: Metropolitan Council)
I
(Other glass,
aluminum and
iron containers)
A mandatory deposit does not address the total solid waste stream
-- only a very small percentage of it. And a mandatory deposit
only reduces the total waste stream by less than 1 percent. Our
conclusion: forced deposits are a lot of expense and effort for
I percent. In contrast, waste reduction, reuse, recycling and
burning programs can address 100% of our solid waste problems.
U.S. Senator Gaylord Nelson points out that EPA
figures show that beverage cans and bottles are only
5% of the nation's solid waste. "If that is the case,"
he says, "then we should not launch a separate program
which only addresses itself to 5% of the problem."
The Waste Management Act of 1980 placed Minnesota on a road to
total, comprehensive solid waste management. Not just 1% or 3%
or even 7% -- but 100 percent! The key to this strategy is
recycling. And curbside programs in highly populated areas and
recycling centers in ~ess densely populated areas are the keys to
r ecyc 1 ing.
Recycling programs are already showing success.
We have come a long way with voluntary recycling in Minnesota.
Over 60% of aluminum cans are being recycled today. In 1980
it was only 20 percent. Paper recycling has increased 50% 'since
1980. Since 1980, more than $50 million has been paid to
Minnesotans for recycled aluminum, steel, paper, glass and
plastic. That's progress!
Recycling programs are strong and active.
About 75% of all Ramsey County households will receive curbside
pickup of recyclable materials this year. In Minneapolis,
recycling collection is available to 100% of households. In
outstate Minnesota, approximately 450 recycling programs exist in
about 225 communities in 73 counties.
More marketing and information programs are the answer.
Many communities throughout urban and rural Minnesota have active
programs to inform and educate residents about recycling. Other
marketing approaches can be implemented, such as a "lottery"
conducted in Rockford, Illinois where $1000 is randomly awarded
to a resident who participates in source separation; the Rockford
household recycling rate has increased significantly due to this
program.
RECYCLING IS THE ANSWER TO COMPREHENSIVE HASTE MANAGEMENT.
75 YEARS
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
April 1, 1.987
TO:
FROM:
RE:
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
JIM FACKLER, PARKS DIRECTOR~
PARKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT, MARCH
PARKS DEPARTMENT OPERATION
General
With an early spring, my activity has been centered mainly in two areas,
the Commons dock applications, and park clean up. Currently, I do not
have any additional help in the maintenance area. The first seasonal
employee returning.will be John Taffe on March 30th. Then Bob Johnson
will return in mid April. The Mowing crew will not begin until June 1.
So at the start of this spring and summer season we have a lot Of work
to be performed; park repair and cleanup, rip rapping, grass seeding and
many other tasks. These will have to be set aside if the weather is
real condusive to grass growing because the mowing crew will not be here
until June 1.
Commons Docks
With the early ice out, the docks system has seen a lot of activity.
Dell Rudolph, the Dock Inspector, has returned to work one week early
this year to help with the questions and applications. The docks program
over the next few weeks will demand a lot of time. Dell will be pro-
cessing the 1987 applications, staking out dock sites, inspecting docks,
helping provide a list of areas to be rip rapped, and reporting to the
Parks Commission.
Cemetery
Howar Simar will be returning this year as the care taker of Union Cemetery.
We ~ave received compliments on the tree trimming done. The area is
looking very nice.
Tree Removal
March has seen $1045. in tree removal. This was for five trees felled, one
forced removal and brush and tree trunk removals.
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511
EMERGENCY 911
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle, City Manager ~
Len Harrell, Chief of Police~
Monthly Report for April, 1987
STATISTICS
The police department responded to 713 calls for service in the month of
March. The first quarter of 1987 indicates an increase of 482 contacts
over the same period in 1986. Calls for Part I offenses were 31; including
3 criminal sexual conduct, 8 burglaries, 1 assault, 2 vehicle thefts, and
17 larcenies.
Part II offenses accounted for 78 calls; including 7 child abuse/neglect,
19 criminal damage to property, 3 narcotics violations, 2 liquor law
violations, 6 DWI, 5 simple assaults, 6 domestics (2 with assaults), and
11 harassment complaints, 10 runaway/incorrigibility, and 9 other violationm.
The patrol division issued 271 adult citations; including 34 parking vio-
lations. Juveniles received 36 citations. A total of 232 warnings were
issued.
There was 1 adult arrested for felonies and 7 juveniles. Seventeen adults
were arrested for misdemeanors and 12 juveniles.
The department responded to 24 medical emergencies, 3 property damage
accidents, and 2 personal injury accidents. One hundred and five animal
complaints were answered.
A total of $10,814 in assorted property was stolen in March;'of which
$3,072 was recovered.
II.
INVESTIGATION
March was again a busy month for investigations. Ten cases of abuse/neglect
were investigated accounting for 35 hours of investigative time. Addition-
ally, Sgt. Hudson and Off. Grand continued the follow-up of a criminal
sexual assault situation involving a number of local juveniles.
Time was also spent investigating a harassing communication, a burglary,
2 damage to properties, an assault, a disorderly conduct, and a theft.
III. MANPOWER
Officers used a total of 17 shifts for a variety of time off. Five days
of comp-time were used, 4 sick days, and eight vacation days. Officer
Grand was shifted to work plain-clothes 4 shifts during the month.
IV. OVERTIME
Approximately 32 hours of overtime were used in March. Part of the over-
time was to cover for officer illnesses and the remainder was for court
overtime and late breaking calls.
V. TRAINING
Officers attended 104 hours of training during the month of March. The
schools included constitutional law, animal control, and the spring chief's
conference.
VI. POLICE RESERVES
The police reserves donated 192 hours of service to the department for the
month; Their calls included 2 call outs, 2 community service functions,
ride alongs, and reserve squads..The reserves currently have approximatley
$7,000 in their account and continue to be primarily self-sufficient.
MONTH
ACTIVITY SUMMARY
POLICE/CRIMEACTIVn REP0 T
'- 'MARCH ,,. YEARI.
Hazardous Citations
Non-Hazardous Citations
Hazardous Warnings
Non-Hazardous Warnins~
Verbal Warnings '
Par_~ Citations
DWI
OVER .10
~Accidents
Personal In'u_q.~Accidents
Accidents
'Adult Felon~_Arrests
Adult NiSdemean~r Arrests
Adult Misdemeanor Citations
Juvenile Felony__Arrests
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests
Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations
Part I Offenses
Part II Offenses
Medicals
Animal Com~__laints
0ther General Investi
----7
~tions
T~IS
193.
54'
60
113
94
34
6
2
3
2
0
2
14
10
7
12
8
31
78
24
105
453
THIS
TO DATE
430
178
144
375
220
136
33
24
23
9
0
23
92
25
22
28
13
91
216
48
295
1,225
Assists
37
3O
12
135
34
ll
0
134
31
ll
?0
1,132
Homicide
Criminal Sexual, Conduct 3 1 2 I 5
,Robber~
Assault 1 1 1
Bur81ar~ 8 [ 1 1
,Larceny 17 1 1 1
Vehicle Theft 2 2
.Arson '-
TOTAL 31 1 5 4 I 7
Child AbuSe/NeRlect 7 7 ! l'
Forgery/NSF Checks 1 1 1
,Criminal Damage to Property 19 3
Weapons
,Narcotic Laws 3 3 3
Liquor Laws 2 2 1 2
Dl~rl 6 6 6
Simple Assault 5 1 . 1 "1
Domestic Assault 2 2 2
~omestics (No Assault) 4
~arassment 11 3 1 1
~unaway/Incorrigibility/Tr,,s.cy 10 7 7
Public Peace 1 1
~11 Other Offenses 7 4 2 2
5IrAL 78 15 28 17 ' 12 ·
~operty Damage Accidents
'ersonal Injury Accidents
"atal Accidents
[edicals 24
mimal Complaints 105
[utual Aid 17
~ther General Investigations 453
~OTAL 604
,OTAL ACTIVITIES 713 ,
C i .ty MOUND Month
C I'~AT I ONS
L
H.~CH
ADULT
DWi or OUI
Hore than .10~ BAC
Careless/Reckless 0rivin9
JUV
0rivin9 After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speedin9
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on OL
Improper, Expired, or No Plates
Illegal Passing
~Violations
Fallure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving_the Scene
No Insurance ·
'or Unsaf~ Turn
Pa~king'Vi61ations
Crosswalk
Oo~dinances
Oerelict Autos
His~ellaneous Tags
TOTALS
WARNINGS
No Insurance
Traffic
~ent
Crosswalk
Animals
Trash/Derelict Autos
Other
TOTAL
ARREST~
6
2
1
9
8
136
1
2
l&
1
8
16
11
34
1
3
18
271
102
2
Fe I ony
14i sdemeano~
1
2
1..
1
1
1
"1
36
20
PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SU~tARY
ITEM
Bikes
Snowmobiles
Boats, Hotors, Trailers
Clothing
Currency, Notes, Etc.
Jewelry & Precious Metals
Guns
Home Furnishings
Radio & Electronic Equlpment
Vehicles & Vehlcle Equipment
Hlscellaneous
.TOTAL
STOLEN
$ 322
'2,000
470
518
5,800
1,704
$10,814
RECOVERED
$ 3,000
72
3,072
MOUND POLICE RESERVES
MONTHLY HOURS
MARCH 1987
OFFICER ECO RS RA
B. HAWKS 1.5
D. THOMPSON 6
B. BROWN 2.5 8
R. VOGEL 45
D. ST. CYR 10
D. NICCUM 4 2.5 43.5
C. STAHLBUSCH 2
TOTAL 5.5 5 112.5
TR
6
5
17.5
15.5
31.5
ECO - EMERGENCY CALL OUT
TRANSPORTS
RS - RESERVE SQUAD
RA - RIDE ALOING W/REGULAR OFFICER
TR - TRAINING TAKEN
GUN TRAINING
IN - INSTUCTION GIVEN
NO INSTUCTION GIVEN THIS MONTH
CS - COMMUNITY SERVICE DETAILS
DANCE FOR HEART
HIGH SCHOOL DANCE
AD - ADMINISTRATIVE HOURS
IN
CS
4.5
3.5
6.5
- 14.5
AD
10
10
3
2~
T
22
21
14
45
16
74
17.5
192
PREF'ARED BY,
DEBBIE THOMPSON, SGT.
OFFICER
B. HAWKS
D. THOMPSON
R. VOGEL
D. ST. CYR
D. NICCUM
B. BROWN
C. STAHLBUSCH
TOTAL
MOUND POLICE RESERVES
SEVERANCE PAY
MARCH 1987
AMOUNT DEPOSITED
5.00
5.00
10.00
TOTAL
196.50
215.00
252.50
115.00
90.00
65.00
20.00
952.00
PREPARED BY
o ~OUND FIRE DEPARTMENT HONTHLY'ACTIVITY REPORT
THIS LAST THIS YEAR LAST YEAR
~ I~'~ 'MONTH MONTH TO DATE TO DATE
~ONTH OF /'l~~ ~ O /
NO. OF CALLS
MOUND - FIRE
EMERGENCY
M'TONKA BEACH - FIRE
EMERGENCY
MINNETRISTA - FIRE
EMERGENCY
ORONO - FIRE
EMERGENCY
SHOREWOOD - FIRE
EMERGEHCY
SPXING PA~K - F~RE
EMERGENCY
MUTUAL AID FIRE
.
EMERGENCY
TOTAL FIRE CALLS _ "
TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS
CO~CA~
RESIDENTIAL
INDUSTRIAL
G~SS & MISCELLANEOUS
-Au~o
FALSE ALARM
No. OF HOURS - MOUND FI~
EMERGENCY
~O~AC
- HT~ .Ce .Fl~
EMERGENCY
TOTAC
'-M'T~STA FI~E
' EHE~ENCY
TOTA~
- O~ONO Fl~
· * * TOTAL
- SHO~WOOD F~E
E~NCY
TOTAC
-SP. PA~K F~RE
EMERGENCY*
-MUTUAC A~D F~
~E~NCY
TOTAC
TOTAL DRILL HOURS
TOTAL FIRE HOURS
TOTAL FIRE ~ EMERGENCY HOURS
Mound, ]~.tan~sota ,~ . .
FOR MO~H OF/~'/~ M~,/~ ~ ~
R..~'ORT
: .
~ .. DATE' DATE DRILLS DRILL MAIN. TOTAL 'HOURLY ,.
} O. Anderson '
~' J. Beauchamp
, ".G. Oarvais ,- .~ ~. ....
.. 6. Johnso~ .
~',,, · · ' · Y~ 6. oo ~/~- .
~. To~V ~ ~ ~ -~ ~' ~ S.O0 /~ ~ ·
Discipllne .and Team ~,~ork
Crltlque of Fi res
pre-Plannlng.: >')nspecti°ns
T'ools & AppJratu~' Identlf¥1ng
· Hand Extingulsher, OPeration/
Wearing Protectlve~Clothl ng
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
D)~ I'LL
Time
Pumper OpcrJtlon
Films
First Aid and Res'cue Operatlon
U~c of Self-Contalned Masks
Time
Fire Strea,ns r. Frlctlon Loss
tlouse Burni ng;~'
Natural (; Pr'opn~e (;,ns Talk ........
I; Dcrnonstr~tlons
Ladder Evolution.~ ' -- ....
Salvage Operations'
Radio Operations
tlouse Evolutlon-~
~/J- ~ ~e. Nozzle & llose Al 1 in,,ce
Inhalator Operation
HouYs Training Pald ~
Excused X Unexcused 0__ p, esent, ttot Pald
"~//,,~. J Andersen
~, ~:l~'i .An-de rs 0 n
D~/~-- J Babb
~,Vj__ j Beauchamp
~ ~/~.- D Boyd
~'/~1- D Bryce
~'/~,S Bryce
D Carl son
/J-'S Collins
-~-T?~M David -
~ C Erickson
· ~]~. S Er'ickson
~l/~l.. a Glarvais ' ~l/~l-M Palm
~9~"L Heitz ..... "':~!~ 6 Pederson
~/;)__C Henderson ~l/J_ D Platzer
~V;~-'G Johnson. ~Vj._T Rasmussen
~LY/~. M Kleeberger ~/~ M Savage
~t/J..B Landsman ~/~. R Stallman
~t/;_ R Marschke · 'C)~/~ T Stallman
~/j-J Nafus ,~/j_ T Swenson,
ill~J_ M Nelson ~;;L_.W Swenson
"'J.'/j_ A Opitz ~ M Tobey
~.t/~ B Palm '~)/j.._ R Will lams
~ mG P aTM ~ )/~ ~T Williams
.
MOUND, MINNESOTA,\55364
D R ! L L R E P O R T
Date
Disclpline and
.Tegm ~/o r k
T[me
Pumper Oper,'; t i on
'c
Cr ~ t i que of F' res
P re-P 1 ann ing .'t,' Inspect ions
Tools & Apparatus .identifying
Hand Extinguisher Operat)o~,
Wearing Protective Clothing
Films
Fire Streams & Friction Loss
tlouse Burnlng~
Natural l; Prop.~.e Gas
& Dernor~s ira t i ¢,ns
Ladder Evolution.~
Salvage Op.era ti o.s
Radio Operations
Talk
First .A.id and Res'cue Operation
U~c of Self-Contained Hask.~
Inhalator Operation
NOTE: Hou'Fs Training Paid ~ Excused- X
House EvolutTons
Nozzle I; llose A1 1 i.',,ce
Unexcus~.d
0 P;cse.t, Uot Pa;d
Babb
Be.auc.hamp
Boyd
Bryce
Bryce
Carlson
Collins
David
Erickson
Erickson
GmB rva i s
· Hei tz
Henderson
Johnson
Kleeberger
La6dsman
Marschke
Nafu s
Nelson
Opit-z
Palm
Palm
Palm
Pederson
T_ Rasmussen,'
Savage
Stal 1 man
Stallman
Swenson
Swenson
Tobey
Williams
Williams
~-~ ~
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
· -'. MEN ON DUTY
3 -. - J. Andersen
~/ G. A~derson
J. Babb
J. Beauchamp
Z D. Boyd
~ .D. Bryce
O S. Bryce
~ D. Carlson
~ //~ S. ~Ccllins
M. David
B. Erickson
S. Erickson
J. Garvats
L. Heitz
C. Henderson
G. Johnson
~ M. Kleeberger
~ ~.. B"/'~Landsman
R. ~ar~chke
J. Nafus
TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS
/
M. Nelson
A. Opitz
B. Palm
G. Palm
M. Palm
G. Pederson
D. Platzer
T. Rasmussen
M. Savage .-
T. Stallman
T. Swenson
W. Swenson
M. Tobey
R. Williams
T. Williams
75 YEARS
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYVVOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
April 10, 1987
TO:
FROM:
RE:
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR:~''LIJ
MARCH 1987 FINANCE REPORT
AUDIT
The annual audit of the city's financial statements took place the end
of March. I prepared all of the statements and notes to the financial
statements. The auditors had some minor adjustments they made to the
statements. The audit will be presented to the Council at the April 28th
meeting.
COMPUTER
The stand alone computer system was approved by the Council on March 10.
The computer hardware was ordered on March 11, with an expected delivery
date the end of April. The first step in preparation for the computer
installation is getting the building equipped to meet the computer's
electrical requirements. Also, cable must be installed to the various
terminal locations within city hall. Upon completion of electrical
and cabling requirements, we will be ready for the arrival of the
computer hardware.
March 1987 Finance Report
April 10, 1987
Page 2
INVESTMENTS
The followin9 is March investment activity:
Balance 3-1-87
Bought.:
CD 6.1 Due 4-30-87 St. Bank of Mound
CD 6.1' Due 6-10-87 Marquette
CP 6.1 Due 4- 7-87 Piper
CP 6.16 Due 5-22-87 Dain
CP 6.11 Due 6-18-87 Dain
CP 6.45 Due 4-24-87 Piper
$7,520,030
180,000
420,000
73,687
313,588
243,227
179,230
Matured:
CP 5.5 Daln (349,892)
BA 5.5 American (194,561)
CD 5.95 Marquette (110,000)
CP 5.75 Dain (180,610)
Repo 6.2 Marquette (200,000)
CP 6.4 Piper (210,000).
Fed. Home 11.05 Kidder (500,000)
Repo 6.0 Marquette (280,000)
CP 5.73 Marquette (119,768)
CD 7.75 St. Bank of Mound (250,000)
Balance: 3-31-87 $6,534,831
STAFFING
Lois Sandqulst had surgery and missed three and one-half weeks of work
during March. This made it a busy month for the staff filling in on
utility billing duties, in addition to their regular responsibilities.
Gayle and Dee did a good job in answering water bill questions from
residents and keeping the utility billing system operating. Joyce
Nelson helped get the March commerical bills out. I am happy to report
that Lois is feeling better and back to work with us.
JN:ls
7701 COUNTY ROAD 110 W · MINNETRISTA, MINNESOTA 55364 · 446-1660
April 5, 1987
Mr. Edward J. Shukle,' Jr.
City Manager'
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55564
Dear Mr. Shukle:
Thank you for your letter of March 31, 1987. Minnetrista
City Council appreCiateSthesupport that the Mound City
Council has granted regarding a smaller regional park
facility.in Minnetrista that can be combined with Carver
Regional Park.
Our City Council.supports 'a park of up to 126 acres which
would allow one lake access on the 'upper lake and would
also provide for the 'straightening of County Road 44.
The City Council also appreciateS'that Mr. Reese will
be testifying at the Metropolitan Council meeting o£
April 9.
Please convey our thanks to your City Council for their
s~nport, if you have 'any questions or comments, please
call our office.
Sincerely,
Wally Clevenger
Mayor
WC:gmo
183 Uttiversity Ave. E., St. Paul, MN 55101-2526 (612) 227-5600
April 3, 1987 ~
TO:
FROM:
RE:
City Clerks
Helen Schendel, Associate Director
Election Bill Would Supercede All City Charter~
On April 2, Senator Luther introduced legislation that would
establish a "locai'government~electi°n day!' for,elections of'all':
county, city,.and school district officers, County and municipal.
judges, and officers of all other political subdivisions, except
townships.
The bill would set the first Tuesday after the first Monday in
November in each odd-numbered year as the local government election
day. The regular election of ali elective officers of every county,"
city and school district, or any other political subdivision would
take place on the established local government election day.
The proposed legislation would supercede all charter provisions and
ali general and special laws to the extent inconsistent with the
intent of the legislation.
The first local government day would be November 6, 1993. Terms would
be extended where necessary to comply with the provisions of the
legislation except home rule charter cities may ext'end or reduce
terms by ordinance if they adopt it before Dec. 1, 1992. However,
the bill requires that terms be for an even number of years and
staggered. Charter cities could extend terms of two years to terms
of four years.
Under the bill, local governments would hold primary elections six
weeks before the election day. The bill would require all cities to
have primary elections if more than two people file for an office or
if more than twice the number of people to be elected file for an
office. Cities of 2,500 population or less would not need to have
primaries, but could if they pass an ordinance or resolution at least
16 weeks before the election day. Such a measure would be effective
for all following elections unless the city revoked it.
Filings for ali offices to be filled on local government election day
would begin 14 weeks before and conclude 12 weeks before the primary
or begin eight weeks before and conclude six weeks before the
election day if there is no primary.
The bill would require school district elections to be held.in conjunctio~
with city and county elections. It.would also require'the city to
consult with the boards of each school district and each municipality
which includes territory of school districts wholly or partially in
the city before taking final' action on designating precinct
boundaries.
All terms of office for those offices elected at the local government
election day would begin on the first Monday in January following
their election.
Even though the uniform election day would begin in 1993, many of the
sections of the bill would take effect August 1~ 1~87~
THE SENATE ELECTIONS AND ETHICS COmmITTEE WILL HEAR THIS BILL ON
WED., APRIL 8 AT 11:30 A.M. IN ROOM 107 OF THE CAPITOL. WE ENCOURAGE
CITY OFFICIALS TO BE PRESENT. IF YOU CAN'T ATTEND, PLEASE CALL YOUR
SENATOR NOW AND EXPRESS YOUR CONCERN AND OPPOSITION TO S.F..13~1.
LEAGUE POLICY OPPOSES MANDATORY. PRIMARIES, SUP~RCEDING HOidE RULE
CHARTERS, AND MANDATING ADDITIONAL COSTS FOR THE CONDUCT OF
EdECTiONS.
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511
EMERGENCY 911
March 30, 1987
Ms. Grace Brunner
Ms. Eugenia Petersen
1642 Heron Lane
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ms. Brunner:
Sank you for your ge~er'ous 'd0~a~i~n'of $50 to ~h~'~nd Police
Department. The money will be used toward the recent purchase of
bullet-proof vests for our officers.
Sank you for your concern'for the-safety of our officers and your
suport of the Mound Police Department.
~_~hei~~f..
~ POLICE D~AR~
LH/sh
Mound City Days
'April 10, 1987
Dear Friends': /
This is your Mound City Days Chairperson, Harold Meeker. We
will be having our next Mound City Days meeting.on Wednesday,
April 22nd, at 7:30 PM, in the Mound City Hall Coun6il Chambers.
We have the buttons, banners, signs and the brochure of Mound's
75-year history. But we need your hplp yet. Since Mound City
Days belongs to the people of Mound, we would like to finish
off our three-day celebration with a fireworks display Sunday
evening, June 14th, at dusk. It also happens to be Flag Day.
We have the per'on to set them off, our own. Council member
Skip Johnson and crew. We have the location. 'We have the
people. 'But we lack the monies for a decent fireworks display
for the celebration of our 75 years.
If you wish to help us'in this matter, send whatever.~ou can
to: Mound City Days, P.O. Box 355, Mound MN'55364, or call
472-6682 or City Hall 472-1155.
See you Wednesday, April 22nd,,7:30 PM. '
Thanks.
Harold Meeker
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 6121473-7033
FRANK MIXA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
BOARD MEMBERs
Robert Rascop, Chairman
Shorewood
JoEIlen Hurt, Vice Chairman
Orono
Mark Westlund, Secretary
Wayzata
Jon Elam, Treasurer
Mound
Marvin Sjorlin
Tonka Bay
J~n Boswinkel
Minnetonka Beach
Robert Tipton Brown
Greenwood
Walley Clevenger
Uinnestrista
Richard J. Garwood
Deephaven
Ron Kraemer
Spring Park
Robert K. Pillsbury
Uinnetonka
Robert E. SIocum
Woodland
Ron Spargo Victoria
al H, Weisser
Excelsior
TO: MEMBER MUNICIPALITIES
DATE: APRIL 8, 1987
Enclosed for your records is a copy of
the Financial Statement of the Lake
Minnetonka Conservation District for
1986 and an additional copy for posting~
The 1986 Financial Statement was
accepted by the Board of Directors at
its regular meeting February 25, 1987.
Executive Director
mk
Enc. 2
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
1986
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
1986
DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF CASH RECEIPTS, DISBURSEMENTS, BALANCES
Fund
Balance Disburse- Balance
1-1-86 Receipts. ments 12-31-86
General
Petty Cash
Save the Lake
Total
$ 43,174.11 $131,945.91 $121,773,83
200.00
75,213.46 25,896.53 25,402.62
$118,587.57
$157,842.44
$147,177.45
$ 53,345.19
200.00
75,707..37
$129,252.56
Advance Payment of Dues
Fee Advances
Fee Deposits
Metro Loan
Investments'
15,000.00 7,169.00
Balance
1-1-86 Purchased Redeemed
3,334.00
48,455.00
1,600.00
7,831.00
$190,472.56
General Fund $ 90,502.21 $ 53,843.74 $ 50,038.33 $ 94,307.35
Save the Lake Fund 72,716.45 92,691.72 97,266.60 68,141.57
Donations
Other Income
Total Save
the
LMCD Communities
Other Income
Total General Fund
TOTAL RECEIPTS -
Projects
Total Save the
CLASSIFICATION OF RECEIPTS - 1986
Lake Fund
Save the Lake Fund
General Fund
$20,825.00
5,071.53
(dues) $49,975.00
81,970.91
1986
CLASSIFICATION OF DISBURSEMENTS - 1986
Lake Fund
Save the
Lake Fund
$25,402.62
$ 25,896.53
$131,945.91
$ 25,402.62
$157,842.44
(Balance Forwarded)
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
LMCD 1986 Financial Statement
Page 2
CLASSIFICATION OF DISBURSEMENTS - 1986
Brought Forward:
Save the Lake Fund
General Fund
Administration
Personal Services
Salaries
'Auditing Services
Total Personal Services
Contractual Services
Telephone
Postage
Printing
Utilities
Maintenance: Office Equipment
Janitorial Services
Inspections
Other Contractual Services
Total Contractual ServiCes
$61,298.94
500.00
$ 649.87
1,785.62
783.17
299.20
1,540.78
675.00
2,114.01
$ 61,798.94
$ 7,847.65
Commodities & Supplies
Office Supplies
Books & Periodicals
General Supplies
Total Commodities and Supplies
$ 1,620.18
97.10
198.63
$ 1,915.91
Other Charges
Office Rent
Insurance & Bonds
..Memberships
Employer Contributions
Mileage & Expenses
Total Other Charges
Capital Outlay
Office Furniture, Fixtures &
Equipment
Total Capital Outlay
$ 3,600.00
1,468.00
245.00
9,668.60
981.53
$ 4,278.14
$ 15,983.13
$ 4,278.14
Legal
Legal Services
Prosecutions
Total Legal
Committees & Contingency
Water Structures & Environment
Lake Use
Executive
Public Information & Program
Total Committees & Contingency
$14,222.86
13~D89.45
$ 96.61
1,315.20
426.94
$ 28,112.31
$ 1,838.75
Total General Fund
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS- 1986
(continued)
$ 25,492.62
$121,774.83
$147,]77.45
pr.tl 1 1, 1987
RESOLUTION NO. 87-
RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER
TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH THE LAW
ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICE, INC., LOCAL 35
- LEL~ POLICE SUPKRVISOPJSERCEINT$
WHEREAS, the City Manager has negotiated a new two year
Union Contract with the Police Supervisor/Sergeants; and
WHEREAS, said contract would be effective January 1,.
1987 through December 31, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize and direct
the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into a labor agreement
with the Law Enforcement Labor Service, Inc., Local 35 (Police
Supervisor/Sergeants) to be effective January 1, 1987 through
December 31, 1988. Copy of same on file in the Office of the
City Clerk.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
April 1987
RESOLUTION NO. 87-
RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND THE CITY
MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEHENT WITH
THE MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW
-. ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 320
POLICE PATROLMEN
WHEREAS, the City Manager has negotiated a new two year
Union Contract with the Police Patrolmen; and
WHEREAS, said contract would be in effective January 1,
1987 through December 31, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize and direct'
the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into a labor agreement
with the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees
Union, Local 320 (Police Patrolmen) to be effeCtive January 1,
1987 through December 31, 1988. Copy of same is on file in the
Office of the City Clerk.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
75 YEARS
April 13, 1987
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155
TO:
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
FROM:
RE:
JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR
CITY ATTORNEY & PROSECUTING ATTORNEY EXPENSES - 1986
PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
Prosecution (Paid to Attorney)
Board of Prisoners
(Paid to Hennepin County)
$24,580
19,929
$44,509 General Fund Expense
CITY ATTORNEY
Retainer $1,550/mo.
Allied Painting
Codification (one time cost)
Misc. over retainer
$18,600
1,203
15,0O0
5,159
$39,962 General Fund Expense
Bills Paid by Escrow Agreements, Other Departments or Funds
(The following were not paid out of the General Fund except for Contel)
Escrow Agreements
Langdon View $ 227
Chapman Place 333
Sinclair Court 603
Richard Anderson 925
Seton Townhouses 25
Cooks Bay Estates 500
Ess 275
Other Departments or Funds
$ 2,888
Lynwood Blvd. $ 4,903
Contel 4,946
Dove Lane 738
Roof Case 669
Skinner Case 375
Bartlett Blvd. 75
Beachwood Pond 65
79 Streets 51
Tuxedo Blvd. 50
$11,872
LAW OIrltlCr s
WURST, PEARSON, HAMILTON, I.ARSON '~' UNDERWOOD
IIOO FIRST BANK PLACE: WEST
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 5540~
September 19, 1985
Mr. Steven C. Smith
2710 Clare Lane
Mound, MN 55364
Re: Legal Expenses
Dear ¥~. Smith:
In 1966 I was retained by the Mound City Council to.be the
City Attorney. I was paid a retainer of $500 per month, plus I
billed for extra services outside the retainer agreement. ~he
retainer was to cover regular Council meetings, staff questions,
residents questions and matters general in nature, such as prep-
aration of routine ordinances and opinions
In 1981 my retainer was $1400 per month; it has not changed
in the last four years. The CPI from 1967 to date is at roughly
310 so therefore a retainer in today's dollars, which would be the
same as 1967, would be $1550 - that means that professionally I
am being paid less now by the City of Mound than I was when I
started. My office bills for work outside the retainer at rates
from $50 to $85 per hour.
Mr. Larson was appointed as the City Prosecutor and he oper-
ates that function separately from my role as City Attorney. For
over 20 years the civil and criminal affairs were handled by
separate offices. I am including a Iist of answers from him for
all the criminal matters and that would appear to answer most of
your questions.
It is impossible to answer your question concerning Contel
condemnation because no one can project what activities or time
will be required, to a large extent that depends on the policy
decisions of the City Council. We cannot project who is going to
sue the City. Greg Skinner ha~ now started a lawsuit in Federal
Court; might other employees also sue the City. How many
Wagemans and others will decide the City has done something illegal.
I believe you can understand why it is necessary for a general
retainer and for other work to be covered based on time spent on
-47-
WURST, PEARSON, HAMILTON, LAR$ON & UNDERWOOD
Mr. Steven C. Smith
Septembe= 19,1985
Page Two
the various cases. I hope this answers the questions raised
by your letter of September 6, 1985.
Very truly yours,
Curtis A. Pearson
City Attorney
CA~/ej
Enclosure
cc: Fran Clark, Acting City Manager
-48-
- C'ITY OF MOUND - Prosecution Matters
Number of criminal cases initiated by complaint in 1984 ...... .
Number of criminal cases initiated by complaint
projected, for 1985 .., . . . . , . . . . . . ....,...... , ..
Number of hours in Court on first appearances, motions, eta .... (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985)
Number of hours in Court on trials .................. (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985)
Total number of hours in Court ..................... (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985)
128
23O
120.25 hrs.
155.50 hrs,.
275.75 hrs.
Types of cases handled:
DWI, BAC Over .10, DAR, DAS, DAC, Speed,
Careless Driving, Disorderly Conduct, Simple
Assault, Zoning Code Violations, Animal
license and control matters, Misc.
Number of Misdemeanor eases initiated by complaint ........ (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985)
Number of Gross Misdemeanor cases initiated by complaint .... (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985)
159
Monthly Retainer .............................
Hourly rate charged ...........................
Number of hours billed for prosecution matters . . . , ....... (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985) '
Non-legal expenses or reimbursements collected ...........
(Xerox copy expense, postage, sheriff fees)
Do Not Bill For:
Travel or Seeretarial/Paralegal Time
None
$ 60
421.25 hrs.
902.45
Number of cases handled which were set on for Couri TriaLs .... (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985)
Number of eases handled which were set on for Jury Trials ..... (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985)
Number of cases tried to the Jury (Aug. 1984- Aug. 1985)
Number of cases on appeal ........................
46
8O
3
1
! ~ould propose to provide +.bo ~ollov~ug regular or
"routine" legal mervicea for the village under ~ monthly
retainer a~ree~ent ~nd will hill th~ village ~or certain special
legal services not covered by the ret~iner, In genersl, the
retniner aEr~e~ent would co~pensste for those legal services
which are of a Inirly constant, pr~dict~ble and recurring
n~ture. Extra billings will be ~nde for legsl services vhic..h ~re
Dot routine in nature, which may wary consider~bl~ fro~ ~onth
to ~onth or fro= yeur to ~ear, ~nd which ~re, therefore, dtf-
iicult to include i~ s retainer because of their u~predictable
mature ·
Under the retainer, I ~uld expect to provide the
followtn~:
1. ittent reEular council ~etin~s and special council
~eetin~s at which my attendance is requested. _
~ovl~ leal advice on willie aat~ra to i~
~untcipal Judge, etc.)
Provide such legal sdvice includinC any pecess~ry
leiIsl r~search ~nd the draItin~ o! letters or other
~e~orsud) where needed,
f~. Drnft ~ll ney council ordir~nces snd non-routine
resolutions when requested. *~or~" resolutions
would be prepared !or use on such =atters ~s
public t~vroye=ents.
4. Draft ~nd ap~o~ t~ ex~ution of village contrects
s~ of which ye will ~~ to standard fo~.
5. ~vl~ all contract ~rfor=~e bon~ =s to fo~ _
6. ~ns~er inquiries fro~ the public on villaEe mstters.
These lnquirie= often nre by telephone and =ay
ori~in~te ;ith residents of the village or with_
attorneys or other pnrties havir~ business either
;ith the =unicipal court or with tho council-
pdmintstrative end of village opera~tons.
Under the category o! ~dditio~l legal services not
'1
covered try the retainer are ~uch oer'v~coa ns the following:
1. prep=rntton for and nppe~rnnces in District Court,
the Supreme Court, and before other non-village
5. ~ork involvin~ the purch~e, condmnn~tion or other
scqutsitio~ of 1-~nd or. e~seme~ts.
~ork ~nvolv~ng the ftn~ncim6 of vlll~e ~rove-
4. ments such as the. dr~ttn~ of ~l~ial re~olut~ons
or contracts, assembling and r~viewtu~ bond
tr~nscrXpts, obtainin~ or providing ~n npprovi~
bond opinion, etc.
5. Ordinsnce codification.
I ~lieve that ~e fore~o~ it~ of le~l --~
c~ise ~ c~~lve ltBti~ of ~e $~ of work ~t
fr~uently e~c~~d, in~ catego~ ~ t~ ot~r. There
~y ~ ite~ of v~k which I have ~erl~,~d or which I h~ve
not ~tici~ted f~ the fu~. ~h 1~ ~ld ~'cove~d by
t~ ~t~iner, u~s othe~[2e ~~ ~~n t~ cou~il and
myself. I will ntt~pt to call to the c~ncil*s At~ntion ~
s~l c~es or s~c[al ty~s of work not ~entioned ~ve, ~d
f~ which extr~ collation ~td ~ cl~i~d.
~r statements voul~ also t~lu~ cl~ f~ ~b~-
~nt of ~t-of-~het e~~ inched by ~e or ~ f~ on
behAl$ of the villege.