The URL can be used to link to this page

1987-07-14 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, JULY 14, 1987 COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. Pledge of Allegiance Approve the Minutes of the June 23, 1987, Regular Meeting. Pg. 1963-1973 PUBLIC HEARING: Case #87-638 - James & Katie Fox, 2925 Stratford Lane, Lots 1, 2 & 3, Block 7, Wychwood Request: Proposed Vacation of Dorchester Road from Stratford Lane to Essex Lane Pg. 1974-1982 PUBLIC H,~ARING: Case #87-640 - Arvin Senne, 6099 County Road 26, Mound, Request: Conditional Use Permit Request for Expansion of Cabinet Shop and Office at 5558 Auditor's Rd. Pg. 1983-1991 PUBLIC HEARING: Case #87-641 - Norman R. Berglund, 4611 through 4658 Kildaire Road Request: Proposed Zoning Map Amendment to Change the Zoning of a Portion of Blocks 1 and 11, All of Block 2, All in Seton Addition, From R-4 Multi- Family Residential to R-2, Single Family Residential. Pg. 1992-1999 ,PUBLIC HEARING: Case #87-646 - Norman Berglund, owner of property on South and North of Longford Lane. Request: Proposed Vacation of Portion of Longford Road Between Kings Lane and Black Lake Lane (West Side of Lot 23 to East Side of Lot 10, Block 11, Seton) and that Portion of Kerry Lane North from Longford. Pg. 2000-2003 PUBLIC, HEARING: Case #87-644 - Tom Kelly, 4831 Shoreline Blvd., LOts 1-4, Pt. of 5 & 20 & 21, Shirley Hills Unit "A" Page e 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Requemt: Application to Amend Conditional Use Permit to Allow Bait and Tackle Sales at 4831 Shoreline Blvd. Pg. 200~-2013 PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Amendments to CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) Funds for Year XII and XIII. Pg. 2014-2018 ,CASE $87-6~3: John Peterson, 49XX Edgewater Drive, West 40 feet of Lot 17, Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood Addition Request: Sideyard setback variance. Pg. 201 9-2027 Comments and Suggestions from Citizens Present Continued Discussion on Method of Assessing.--.Costs to Contract with Other Than Hennepin County'for Assessing Services· Pg. 2028-2031 Resolution Authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to Execute a Quit Claim Deed to sell City Property (South 36 feet of Lots 13, 14, & 15, Block 33, Wychwood) Mr. Gregory Sycks Pg. 2032-2035 Resolution Reconveying (if necessary) Certain Tax Forfeit Lands Back to the State and Requesting the the County Board to Impose Conditions on the Sale of Said Tax Forfeit Lands and to Restrict the Sale to Owners of Adjoining Lands - (Portions of Lots 25 & 26, Block 5, Arden) Pg. 2036-2041 Resolution Reconveying (if necessary)'Certain Tax Forfeit Lands Back to the State and Requesting the County Board to Impose Conditions on the Sale of said Tax Forfeit Lands and to Restrict the Sale to Owners of Adjoining Lands and Authorizing Applications for Conveyance from the State of Certain Tax Forfeit Lands - (part of Lot 16, Block 9, Whipple) Pg. 2041-2048 Resolution Requesting Conveyance of Portions of Tax Forfeit Lands; Releasing Certain Portions of Tax Forfeit Lands to Hennepin County for Public Auction; Certifying the Special Assessments; and Requesting an Easement - (Part of Lot B2, all of 33 and part of Lot 34, Block 1, The Highlands) and (Part of Lot 34, all of 35 and part of Lot 36, Block 1 The Highlands) Pg. 2049-20'58 Resolution Reconveying Certain Portions of Tax Forfeit Lands Back to the State; Requesting These Lands be Combined; Requesting the County Board to Impose Conditions on the Sale of Said Tax ~Forfeit Lands and to Restrict the Sale to Owners of Adjoining Lands - (Parts of Lots 17, 18 & 19, Block 1, Arden) - Gregory Petrich Pg. 2059-2064 Page 1961 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Resolution Releasing Certain Tax Forfeit Lands to Hennepin County for Public Auction and Certifying the Special Assessments - (Part of Lots 36 & 37, Block 1, The Highlands) & (Part of Lots 37, 38 & 39, Block 1, The Highlands) Pg. 2065-2068 Resolution Reconveying (if necessary) Certain Tax Forfeit Lands Back to the State and Requesting the County Board to Impose Conditions on the Sale of said Tax Forfeit Lands and to Restrict the Sale to Owners of Adjoining Lands - (Part of Lots 12 & 13, Block 12, Avalon) Pg. 2069-2074 Resolution Revising the 1987 Budget Adopted In Resolutions 86-133 and 86-134. Pg. 2075-2076 Request to Amend Resolution No. 87-16, Regarding Parking on Gull Lane at Wren Road. Payment of Bills INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS: Pg. 2077-2082 Pg. 2083-2098 A. Department Head Monthly Reports for June 1987. B. School Board Minutes of June 8, 1987. Pg. 2099-2127 Pg. 2128-2129 C. LMCD 1988 Budget. Pg. 2130-2138 De Memo From E.A. Hickok and Associates, Engineer for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on Lake Level, Flow and Precipitation for April and May. Pg. 2139-2142 Letter from Police Chief to Around Mound 5 Mile Run thanking them for $100 donation. Police assisted in traffic control and security during the race. Pg. 2143 F. Planning Commission Minutes of June 22, 1987. Pg. 2144-2148 Page 1 962 105 . June 23, 1987 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, June 23, 1987, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5361 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Don Abel, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, City- Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer John Camerbn, City Planner Mark Koegler, Building Official Jan Bertrand, Finance Director John 'Norman, Hennepin County Assessors Don Monk and Keith Rennerfeldt, and the following interested citizens: Mohamed Hamoude, Anthony Barrett, Wayne E. Ehlebracht, Pat Swenson, Audrey Jacobsen, Lavon & Alyce Cooper, Lance-&"Liz Coppin, Jim Bedell, Steve. Coddon, Mark Lundgren, Ralph McCrehin, Roger Reed, Paul Pond, Wonda McCreaig, Oswin Pflug,' K. Peter Siessenbuettel, Murial & Henry Reintz, Janet Derby, James Lovestand, Darlene Luebke, Kip Sherman, Don Ulrich, Jerry Longpre, Irene Porter, Sterling Peterson, Gloria Fechter. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. MOTION made by Abel, seconded by~ jensen to approve the Work Session Minutes of June 3, 1987; Regular Meeting Minutes of June 9, 1987; and the Work Session Minutes of June'lS, 1987, as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ,. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ON METHOD OF. ASSESSING The Mayor reopened the public hearing. No one in the audience came forward to be heard. The Mayor closed the public hearing. · The Mayor then stated he sees one of three things can be done: 1. The Council could vote to cancel the assessing contract with Hennepin County; or 2. The Council could take no action; or 3. The Council could take this under advisement and seek out other contract services to see if those costs would be less than Hennepin County. He stated he favored number 3. Councilmember Jessen read the letter from Leonard Kopp, former City Manager, who stated he was in favor of staying with Hennepin County. She als° noted that former Mayor Bert Larson had also submitted a letter in favor of Hennepin County. 106 June 23, 1987 Councilmember Jensen state that she submitted a letter from Geoff Michael in favor of Hennepin County. MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Smith directing the City Manager to seek out other contract assessing services and compare the costs with what the City is now paying Hennepin County. There was discussion by the Council. The vote was ~ in favor with Councilmember Jessen voting nay. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER MAKING STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO SHORE- ,LINE BL~I). (CTY. RD. 15) BETWEEN COMMERCE BLVD. AND THE MOUND CITY LIMITS AT SETON CHANNEL BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRONS, SIDEWAL~ AND STORM SEWER The City Attorney explained the background of the proposed improvement and that this is Just a hearing to determine if the Council wants to proceed.with this project· He explained the City's responsibilities as they.relate to Minnesota Statute Chapter .429. The City Engineer explained that the County is in the last stages of finalizing plans for the upgrading of Count~ Road 15. Those final plans will come back to the Council for their approval. He handed out explanation sheets and reviewed them with the public (Exhibit A) for these costs and the proposed assessments. He stated that the watermain replacement would be paid from the Water Fund. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mr. Jim Bedell, 4801 Shoreline Blvd., presented a petition signed by 27 persons and 3 persons that were polled by phone stating the following: "We the undersigned, as abutting property owners are opposed to being assessed for the-County Road 15 improvements." The following people had questions or spoke against the proposed improvements and gave the following reasons: 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. Jim Bedell, 4801 Shoreline Blvd· Steve Coddon, 4629 Aberdeen Road Henry Reinitz, 2308 Fernside Road Paul'Pond, 5424 Shoreline Blvd. Pat Swenson, 5050 Shoreline Blvd. Mark Lundgren, Balboa Properties Oswin Pflug, 4851 Shoreline Blvd. Roger Reed, 5~2~ Shoreline Blvd. 107 June 23, 1987 10. 11. 12. 13. Jim Lovestrand, 5001 Shoreline Blvd. Liz Coppin, 8201 County Road 26 Janet Derby, 5032 Shoreline Blvd. Anthony, Barrett, ~867 Shoreline Blvd. wayne Ehlebracht, 4867 Shoreline Blvd. Questions on the improvements and reasons from people listed above for objection: 1. Will railroad be assessed? Yes, if benefit to their' property can be shown. 2... Will credit be given to people who have already been assessed for a previous street project? Credit for storm sewer would be given, but that is all. 3. When would this become an assessment? If passed tonight~'it would be a pending ass'~ssment on all the properties immediately. q. Don't need sidewalk on both si~s of Shoreline Blvd. 5. Don't want to lose trees or shrubs on property, 6. Generally against the entire project, including street lights. 7. Don't want sidewalks, only need good shoulders, curb and gutter, and good roads.. 8.. Are sidewalks really required? Engineer to check with Hennepln County.' - The City Engineer explained the MSA Construction Fund and that approximately $189,$00 of Mound's share would be eligible for reimbursement. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Council discussion on the number of years this project has been in. the works and the need for the i'mprovemen~s. Jessen moved and Abel seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-112 RESOLUTION ORDERING THE ADDITIONAL COUNTY ROAD 15 IMPROVEMENTS AND PREPARATION OF PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS; AND DIRECTING THE STAFF. TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH HENNEPIN COUNT! FOR THE UPGRADING OF COUNTY ROAD 15 Motion made by Smith, to delete the sidewalks from the proposed improvements. The motion died for lack of a second. The vote was q in favor with Smith voting nay. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDER MAKING IMPROVEMENTS ON SHORELINE BLVD. (CTY, RD. 15) BETWEEN COMMERCE BLVD, AND FAIR- ¥~W ~NE BY THE ADDITION OF STREET LIGHTS 108 June 23, 1987 The City Engineer presented his preliminary report and the estimated costs. He also went over the second page of (Exhibit A) which contained estimated assessments. The Mayor opened the public hearing. -The following persons spoke: Mark Lundgren, representing Balboa - not in favor of all the street lights proposed. Paul Pond - asked if the County was requiring the new street lights. The Engineer stated no and explained the cost of the old lights to maintain and operate as outlined in his report. The Engineer further stated that they ha~.a lighting expert look at the 'area at night and the light's presently in use are not adequate. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Abel moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-113 RESOLUTION ORDERING THE STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT ON COUNTY RAOD 15 AND ORDERING THE 'PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANE The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT There were none. PUBLIC HEARING: DELINOUENT UTILITY B~LLS The City Manager reported that the total is down to $1,931.89. Jensen moved and Abel seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-114 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE'. THE DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,931.89 AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT-OFF WATER SERVICE FOR THOSE ACCOUNTS The Vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE 187-649: JAMES A. MC CREHIN, 3137 DONALD DRIVE, LOT 11. BLOCK 14. PEMBROKE, PID I19-117,23 33 0161. VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE EXISTING NONCONFORMING HOUSE SIZE, LOT SIZE AND SETBACK The Building Official explained the request and stated that Mr. McCrehin's father was present representing him. She stated the 109 June 23, 1987 Planning Commission had approved the request and the' proposed resolution was in the packet. Mr. McCrehin tonight is asking to have the 2.25 foot setback to the south property line for his new addition also. The Staff recommended denial of tonight's request. The Council agreed.' Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-115 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVE A VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING LOT SIZE, SIDE YARD, AND FLOOR AREA FOR LOT 11, BLOCK lq, PEMBROKE; PID ~19-117-23 33 0161 (3137 DONALD DRIVE) P & Z CASE ~87- The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ~EQUEST FOR SIGNS AND BANNERS FOR INCREDIBLE FESTIVAL (OUR LADY OF THE LAKE CATHOLIC CHURCH) Councilmember Abel stated he would remove himself from the Council and would abstain' from~voting. He then explained the request and asked that one more banner than was requested be approved. This Would be put on the side of the Koenig & Robin Building. Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-116'RESOLUTION APPROVING 3 PORTABLE SIGNS AND 3 BANNERS ADVERTISING OUR LADY OF THE LAKE'S INCREDIBLE FESTIVAL The vote was 4 in favor with CoUncilmember Abel abstaining. Motion carried. CASE ~87'639: MO~AMED M. HAMOUDE, 1779 WILDRHUST LANE, LOT 3 & PART OF LOT ~, BLOCK 13, SHADYWOOD POINT, PID ~13, 117-2~ 1~ 0019, SIDE YARD & FRONT YARD SETBACK The Building Official explained the request. Commission recommended approval. The Planning Jessen moved and Abel seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-117 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVE A FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR LOT 3 AND PART OF LOT ~, BLOCK 13, SHADYWOOD POINT; PID ~13-117-2q lq 0019, 1779 WILDHURST LANE, P & Z CASE #87-639 110 June 23, 1987 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE ~87-642: LAVON K. & ALYCE J. COOPER, 22ql SOUTHVIEW LANE, PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 12,_MOUND TERRACE, 117-24 34 0004, FENCE MATERIAL VARIANCF The Building Official explained the request. Commission recommended approval. The Planning Abel moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION t87-118 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVE A FENCE MATERIAL VARIANCE FOR PART OF LOT 1, BLOCK 12, MOUND TERRACE; PID !14-117-24 34 0004 (2241 SOUTHVIE4/LANE); P & Z CASE t87-642 The vote was' unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE ~87-645: ROBERT N. & JUDITH A. LUND, 5235 BARTLETT BLVD., TRACTS D & E. REGISTERED L~ND SURVEY ~813 AND PART OF LOT 17, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT C, PID ~2~-117 -24 24 0033, MINOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND The Building Official explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval. RESOLUTION ~87-119 Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION TO APPRovE A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR TRACTS D AND E, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 813 AND PART OF LOT 17, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT C, PID ~24-117-24 24 0033 (5235 BARTLETT BLVD.), P & Z CASE #87-645 The ~ote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried, CASE ~87-647: DIANNE L. WILSON, 5060 TUXEDO BLVD., LOT 8, WHIPPLE SHORES, PID ~24-117,24 43-0056, VARIANCF TO RECOGNIZE EXISTING NONCONFORMING SIDE YARD The Building Official explained the request. Commission recommended approval. The Planning Abel moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-120 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ALLOW A VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR LOT 8, WHIPPLE SHORES; PID ~24-117-24 43 0056, (5060 TUXEDO 111 June 23, 1987 BLVD.), P & Z CASE #87-6~17 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. CASE S87-6~8:. MICHAEL & JUDY GARDNER, 1599 BLUEBIRD LANE, LOTS 18 & 19, BLOCK 6, WOODI-AND POINT, PID $13-1t?-2~ 12 0128, VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE. EXISTING NONCON? FORMING SIDE AND REAR YARD SETBACKS The Building Official explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Jensen moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #87-121 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE' A VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING BUILDING SETBACK FOR LOTS 18 & 19, BLOCK 6, WOODLAND POINT, PID #1B-117-2~ 12 0128, (1599 BLUEBIRD LAND), P & Z CASE ~87-6~8 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. cAsE #87-65-: MARK JEROME ROBERTSON, B103 DEVON LANE, LOTS 1,2, 3,q, & 7, BLOCK 3, ARDEN, PID ~2q-117-2q ~q 0029, VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE EXISTING NONCONFORMING SET~ BACK TO DO STRUCTURAL REPAIRS The Building Official explained the .request. Commission recommended approval. The Planning Johnson moved and Abel seconded the following resolution: REsoLuTION ~87-122 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A FRONT YARD VARIANCE AS REQUESTED FOR LOTS 1,2,3,q, AND 7, BLOCK 3, ARDEN, PID 92~-117-2q qq 0029, (3103 DEVON LANE), P'& Z CASE #87- 650 The. vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. SPT PUBLIC HEARING DATES FOR THE FOLLOWING: JULY 1~, 1987 SUGGESTED DATE: ALL MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jensen to set July 1~, 1987, for public hearings on the following: Be Proposed Vacation of Dorchester Road from Stratford Lane to Essex Lane. Consideration of Conditional Use Permit for Expansion of Cabinet Shop and Office - 5558 Auditor's Road. 112 June 23, 1987 Propose Zoning Map Amendment to Change Zoning of a Portion of Block 1, 2, and 11, Set.n, From R-4 Multi- Family to R-2 Single Family Residential - 4622 Klldare Lane through 4658 Kildare Lane DO Proposed Yaeation of Portion of Longford Road and Kerry Lane North from Longford - 4622 Kildare Road through 4658 Klldare Road. Application to J~nend Conditional Use Permit to Allow Bait and Tackle Sales with Existing Service Station - 4831 Shoreline Blvd. (Union 76) Proposed Amendments to CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) Funds for Years XII and XIII The vote was unanimously in favor.. Notion carried. DISCUSSION ON CHECKLIST FOR PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING REFERENPUY. The City Manager presented a checklist and calendar for the Public Works Building Referendum. The Council discussed this and changed the date for a meeting with the Planning Commission to July 13,. 1987. NOTION made by Abel, seconded by Smith to to proceed as outlined by the City Manager on the Publi~ Works Building Referendum. The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried. RESOLUTION ON 1988 BUD,GET Two.proposed resolutions were presented to the Council, one from Mayor Smith and one from Councllmember Jensen. After discussion: John.son moved and Abel seconded Councilmember Jensen's resolution as follows: .RESOLUTION ~87-123 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POLICY DIREC- TIONS, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR THE CITY MANAGER ON DEVELOPING THE 1988 BUDGET REQUESTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. DISCUSSION ON LOST LAKE (RFP) REOUEST FOR PROPOSALS D~FT The City Planner presented the draft of the RFP. complimented he and the City Manager on the draft. The Council June 23, 19'87 MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jensen to approve the Lost Lake (RFP) Request for ProPosals as submitted and authorize sending it to interested developers. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF LIC£NEES MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jessen to authorize the issuance of the following licenses: Tree Removal License - Bridgewood Tree Service Off-Sale Beer - A1 & Alma's Brickley's Market PDQ Food Store Superamerica ~4194 OD-Sale Beer - A1 & Alma's House of Moy Club License - american Legion Post ~398 VF~ Post #5118 On-Sale Liouor - Donnies on the Lake Sunday Liauor - Donnies on the Lake VF~/ Post ~5113 Set-Uo - A1 & Alma's Wine - A1 & Alma's House of Moy The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. LAKE MINNETONKA REGIONAL PARK The 'Mayor presented a letter written by Mound's L.M.C.D. Representative, Tom Reese, regarding the Lake Minnetonka Regional Park. .Mr. Reese has asked that the Council approve his letter and forward it on to the Suburban Hennepin County Parks Board of 'Commissioners for the hearing that will be held while Mr. Reese is out of town. MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Johnson to approve Mr. Reese's letter to the Suburban Hennepin County Parks Board of Commissioners regarding the Lake ginnetonka Regional Park and dated June 23, 1987. The City will send the letter. The vote was 4 in favor with Jessen abstaining. Motion carried. /??/ June 23, 1987 PAYMENT OF BILLS MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Abel to approve the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $132,060.77, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. iNFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS: Ae Ce May 1987 Financial Report as prepared by John Norman; Finance Director Elected Official Salary Survey as prepared by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Ind. S?hgol Dist. #277 Minutes - May ?9'; 1987 Letters of thank you from the Mound City Days Volunteers for the work done by the City Staff E. Planning Commission Minutes of June 8, 1987 Notice of Annual National League of Cities Congress of Cities and~Exposition to be held in Las Vegas, December 12-16, 1987. Mayor and Councilmembers have attended this in the past and you are encouraged to attend. Please let Fran know as soon as possible so suitable accomodations can be arranged. Memo from the Police Chief on the hiring of Todd Limond who replaces Officer Kyle Larson. .H. Notice from the Association of Metropolitan Municipali- ties regarding openings on the AMM Policy Committee. Please let me know if you are interested.in serving. MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Abel to adjourn at 10:45 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk BILLS ............ JUNE 23, 1987 Batch 874061 Batch 874062 Computer run dated 6/13/87 Computer run dated 6/17/87 ~uper America Hay gasoline ~)1,071.52 40,2~)o .71 698.54 132,060.77 CITY OF HOUND _Hound, Minnesota NOTICE OF PuBLIc HEARING ON PROPOSED VACATION OF DORCHESTER ROAD FROH'STRATFORD LANE TO ESSEX LANE TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that there will be a public "hearing 'at the City Hall, $341Haywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, at 7:30 P.M. on the,~i.] day of iJu. l.%! 1987, to consider the vacation Of a portion of Dorchester Road from th~ East lot lines of Lot 1, Block.7/Lot 30, Block 6 to the West Lot lines of Lot 15, Block 7/Lot 16, Block 6, all in Wychwood (between Stratford Lane and Esse~ Lane). Road abuts the property with address of 2925 Stratford Lane, PID #.1.9-117-23 32 O169, Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above will be heard at this meeting. '~" Y"~- ':., "" ' RICHMOND RD .~ FrAncene C. Clark, City Clerk 'HAMP I%. RROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO, 87-08 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION VACATING CERTAIN STREET AND UT~J..ITY EASEHENTS OVER DORCHESTEA ROAD WFEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 provides that the City .Council may be resolution vacate any street, alley,' public g~ounds, or public way or any part thereof, when it appears in the interest of the public to do so; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has claimed a street and Oti'lity easement over the following described land: ,. · That part of Dorchester Road, as donated and dedicated to the public and as shown on the plat of "WYCHWOOD", according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying between the northerly extensions of the east line of Lot l, Block 7 and the west line of Lot 15, Block 7. WHEREAS, the property identified as P.I.D. 19-117-23 32 170 has access to Manchester Road, a public street..adjacent to the.south property line, but the owner desires access to the rear of his property by private easement across part of the street to be vacated. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on Ouly 14, 1~87, as required by law; and WPEREAS, it has been determined that good area planning requires that these easements be vacated and that a private access easement agreement between the owners of properties identified as P.I.D. ~-117-2~ 32 162 and P.I.D. 1~-117-23 32 170 be executed covering the south 15 feet of the east 125 feet.of the proposed' street vacation. , NOW, TBEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota ~ereby vacates: That part of Dorchester Road, as donated and dedicated to the public and as shown on the plat of "WYCHWOOD", according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying between the northerly extensions of the east line of Lot l, Block 7 and the west line of Lot ]3, Block 7. page 1 of 2 UPON THE FURTHER CONDITION that the City Clerk is hereby directed not to release the resolution to the County Recorder and/or Registrar of Titles until a private access easement agreement between the owners of properties identified as P.I.D. 19-117-23 32 169 and P.I.D. 19-117-23 32 170 is executed covering the south 15 feet of the east 125 feet of the proposed street vacation. After filing of the easement by the property owners, a certfied copy of this resolution shall be prepared by the City Clerk and shall be a notice of com- pletion of the proceedings and shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder and/or Registrar of Titles as set forth in M.S.A. 412.851. page 2 of 2 ~~. McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc. 12800 Industrial Park Blvd, Plymouth, MN 55441 612/559-3700 1-800-328-8322 Ext. 784 .qEC. E ryeO '~'"~ 9 9 "'"'"'"" Engineers Planners Surveyors May 28, 1987 Jan Bertrand Planning & Zoning City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 SUBOECT: Dorchester Road Street Vacation ~<A File #2113 Dear gan: As requested, we have reviewed the proposed vacation of Dorchester Road from Essex Lane to Stratford Lane. As far as we can determine, the City would have no reason to retain this right-of-way. As you will note from the attached drawing, it was determined at the time the wetlands ordinance was passed that most of this right-of-way is located within the wetlands. Also enclosed is a drawing of Stratford Lane which indicates that the driveway to Parcel 0169, (part of Lots l, 2, & 3, Block 7), is already located within the right-of-way of Dorchester Road. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact US. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 3ohn Cameron OC:djk Enclosures /??2 -- i - r-,NK Plannlng Commiss|on Hinutes June 8, 1987 e Case No. 87-638 PUBLIC HEARING on proposed vacation of Dorchester Road ' from StratfordLane to Essex Lane Jim Fox, applicant, Waspresent. The Building Official reviewed the City Engineer's report that states the City has no reason to retain this right-of-way;.Mr. Fox has a driveway coming in on rig~-R~-~ now. One neighbo_r..h~_s ~.playbDuse and split, rall fence whichrappears to-7DSYcS~ster.right-of-waY;~he ~ron~s on Manchester, but .. has a topography problem and the Building 6fficial reccranends, if the Com- . mission considers granting the vacation, it be with condition a private access easement be granted to thesepeople-u-Also- Mr. Fox would not have to comply with a front yard setback rob otb Stratford and Dorches%er for .his garage (side yard 'setback would be applicable on the Dorchester side). The Chair opened, the public hearing. JIM FOX stated Dorchester is a black- topped street that no one uses. VERO~C~G~stated they are in favor of the vacation contingent on their getting an access easement which would be filed.with the deeds. After some discussion, the Chair closed the public hearing, and the Ccn~ission discussed the proposed wacation. Thal moved and Michael seconded a motion'to recos~,~end to the City Council granting the vacation as requested with the proviso that owners reach. agreement on a private'easement to allow the Geyens access. The vote on. the'motionwas unanimously in favor. The Council will be asked to set the public hearing for July 14th, 1987. ~'¥;~'.~'-~ -~. I .'~' ~'-" ' ' APPLICATION FOR STREET VACATION CASE NO. :' ~2, ~'~7 ~7 ~_~' ' CITY OF ,OUND FEE $150.00 {a~:~ss ~': ',.~ ......... ~...~. ' ~ ' ..... .. ' LEGAL DESCRIPTIO~ OF PROPERTY OWNED BY APPLICANT: PID STREET TO BE'VACATED~' ......... REASON FOE REQUEST DATE FILED SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ADDRES Applicant's Interest in Property' Residents and owners of property'abutting the street to be vacated: (Please:.attach list..Certified mailing list'can.be obtained from Hennepln County by calling 348-3271') Recommended by Utillties: NSP ~ ; Hinnegasco ~r~ ; Recommended by City: Public Works }..-~. ; Fire Chief Continental Telephone ; Englneer~; Police Chief ~-3~ ; Other Departments Planning Commisslon Recommendation: Council Action Date Resolution No. /?~o Date 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 Nay Z2, 1~87 TO: Hinnegasco Northern States Power Company Continental Telephone Company · 'v/Public Work Department Fire Department Police Department HcCombs KnFtson Associates, City Engineer Dow-Sat of Hinnesota Subject: Street Vacation The City of Hound has.a request for vacation of the portion of Dorchester Road between Stratford Lane and Essex Lane. Below is a map of the' portion proposed to be vacated. Do you have any uti]lties'in this portion of the street or.do you .. foresee a need for this street in the future? -- Thanks for your .help in supplying this information. Marjorle St u't s~.. . . ' ' "',,~ ,~ ~ R,C~N:, '- ~ ~'~ -' · .,.:-, · .~. ,. . u z ,,,u ...... . ......... ~. ~- - ...... .,~ .... . , ~=T . . ..... ~ ...-. .......... ~{ , TO McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 12800 Industrial Park Blvd. PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 (612) 559-3700 ATTENTION WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached n Under separate cover via [] Shop drawings [] Prints n Plans [] Copy of letter [] Change order n, r-i Samples the following items: [] Specifications COPIE~ DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: [] For approval For your use [] As requested [] For review and comment [] FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS [] Approved as submitted [] Approved as noted , n Returned for corrections [] Resubmit [] Submit [] Return copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints 19__ [] PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYERS COPY TO .--~' ttk'[X~ SIGNED: If enclosures are not es noted, kindly notify uI at once. CITY OF MOUND MOUND, I,tl NNESOTA CASE NO. 87-6ho- NOTICE OF.PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT FOR EXPANSION.OF CABINET SHOP AND' OFFICE AT 5558 AUDITOR'S ROAD PlO NO. 13-i17-24 33 0005 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing wTll be held on TUesdaY; July lb, thi, 1987, at-the Hound Clty Hall, 53/~1-Haywood Road, Hound, H-innesota, for a Conditional Use Pekin.it for fl'oor area expan- sion o¢ cabinet shop and office at 5558 AUDITOR'S ROAD; lega]ly des- cribed: Lot 2 and West 45 feet front and rear of Lot 3,~ Auditor's Subdivision 170' (PID No. 13-117-2~ 33 0005)o All.persons appearing at said hearing will be giVen an opportunity to be heard. Fraficen-e C~ Clark, City Clerk'-' RESO~ NO. 87 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONTINUED OPERATION AND EXPANSION OF A CABINET SHOP - PID %13-117-24 33 0005 CASE NO. 87-640 (5558 Aud;tor$ Road) W6EREAS, a S-1 commercial site located at 5555 Shoreline Boulevard and described as "Lot 2 and W 45 foot front and rear of Lot 3, auditor's 'Subdivision No. 170," Plat 61290/Parcel 0500, PID %13-118-24 33 0005, has owners/tenants requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to expand a cabinet shop; and WH~AS, Section 23.625.3 of the Mound Zoning Ordinance permits such as conditional uses; and WHEREAS, the Uniform Building Code Table 5-B requires a four (4) hour fire rated separatio~ between the H-3 woodworking shop:and the A-3 restaurant occupancy; and ~I~EAS, the building is fully sprinklered; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 14, ]987; and ~4EREAS, the Board of Appeals finding under the provisions of the State Building Code Section 105 allows for alternate methods and materials. 'NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of MoUnd, Minnesota, does hereby, approve the Conditional Use Permit for continued operation and expansion of a cabinet shop in the rear portion of 5555 Shoreline Boulevard upom the conditions that: No outside storage of any materials will be permitted. No painting, staining, varnishing or similar activity will be permitted on the premises. No space within the cabinet shop shall be subleased or used by another party in any manner. Expansion of the floor area of the business shall not occur without modification of the Conditional Use Permit. The alternate fire separation between the A-3 restaurant and H-3 woodworking shop will be reduced from a four (4) hour occupancy separation to a two (2)'hour fire rated assembly under the Uniform Building Code provisions for partition walls and structural members with a sound rating of 50 decibels and the bu|]ding shall be fully sprink]ered throughout. Owner shall erect a sign stating that customer parking is available in the CBD parking lot across the street. 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 · O: Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner DATE: June 2, 1987 SOBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Modification APPLICANT: Arvin Senne CASE NO: 87-640 FILE NO: 87-310-A22-ZO LOC~ON: 5555 Shoreline Boulevard EXISTING ZONING: Central Business (B-I) (DMPREFE~qSIVE PLAN: Commercial PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to expand an existing woodworking assembly operation and office. In 1984, Mr. Senne received a Conditional Use .Permit to operate his business next to-the House of Moy restaurant. The permit states that "expansion of the floor area shall not 'occur without ' modification of the Conditional Use Permit." The business is presently being expanded to include new Shipping, shop and office facilities. The woodworking business has been operating since 1984 without any problems or conflicts with adjacent uses. RELATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed modification of the Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of the woodworking business. Planning Commission H|nutes June 8, 1987 Case'No. 87-640 PUBLIC HEARING for Conditional Use Permit. for Expansion of Cabinet Shop and Office. at 5558 Auditor's Road; Lot 2 and West 45 feet front and rear of Lot 3, Auditor's Subd. 170; PID 13-117-24 33 0005 Arvin Sennewas present. The City Planner, Mark K0egler, reviewed his report and recozmendation for the approval of the proposed modification of the CUP to allow expansion of the floor area for use as shipping area, shop and some office facilities and the Building Official has requested Item 5 on the Resolution 84-32 be amended to state the following: "The alternate fire separation between the A-3 restaurant and H-3 woodworking shop will be reduced from a 4 hour occu- pancy separation to a 2 hour fire rated assembly under the UniformBuilding Code provisions for partitionwalls and structural members with a. sound rating of 50 decibels and the building shall be fully sprinklered throughOut.. Staff is rec~,ending approval.with the amendment. The Chairman~ opened the'public hearing. CURT-JOHNSON, owner of office build- ing to the East, stated he has no problem with expansion e~ept for the parking; delivery semi's block his parking lot and Senne's customers park in his lot and that the "no parking" on street was not enforced. ARVIN SENNE stated deliveries were received 4 times a week for perhaps 10 minutes at a time. Koegler mentioned there was an immense public parking lot across the street. The Conxnission discussed how Senne could get customers to park there;' lot'is robe blacktopped; also that parking enforcement was not C~L,L~Ssion's concern, however, it was mentioned that additional traffic due to expansion of the business was. The Chairman asked Mr. Senne if it would be unreasonable, as a condition' of this, for him to get a sign. made to put on,is door that says, "Cabinet Shop parking across the street"? The Chairman then closed the public hearing, as there were no other c~.ents. Michael moved and Thal seconded a motion to recomnend to the Council, with the Building Official's addition of Item~ 5, approval of the stakf's rec~L,endation. The addition of Item6 (sign) to the motion was discussed. The maker of the motion stated he did not agree with the addition as he didn't see the necessity for ~ 6, a directional sign. ~. Reesemoved and Thal seconded amending the motion to add % 6. The vote on the amendment was Michael opposed, all others in favor. Amendment carried. 'The vote on the motion as amended was unanimously in favor. ' The public ~earing' will be set for July 14, 1987. Date Filed ~'"~-'>7 ..... ~='~..~ ' (Please type the following infor~ion) Legal DesCription of Property. 'Lot ~ ~ ~ ~:/' ~ xZ~¢ ~~ Addition ~,Cor~ ~.6J~,~/~ ~ i70" 3. Owner's Name' Day Phone No. Address Applicant (if other than owner): Name . '/~ ~ u ! ~ .~,. ~/1 e Address <~'O ~ ~ ~ ~/. ~ Type of Request: Day Phone No. ( ) Variance (~ Conditional Use Permit' ( ) Amendment ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( } Sign Permit ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. ( )*Other *If other, specify: Present Zoning'District: ~'~1 ~..m 7. Existing Use(s) of Property 8. Nas an. application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? ~_~.C~ ' If so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken gnd ~rovide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous ~esolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that a11 of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or p]ans tO be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official o~ the City of Hound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and re~ving such notices as may be required by law. Planning Commission Recommendation: Date Council Action: Resolution No. Date=~~ b/82 Procedure for Conditlonal Use Permit (2) D. ED' F. Case Location of: Signs, easements,, underground utilities, etc. Indicate North compass direction. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. III Request for a Conditional Use A. All information.requested below, a site plan as described In Part II; and a development schedule providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the construction must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Type of development for which a Conditional Use Permit ls requested: 1. Conditional Use (.Specify): 2.. Current Zoning and Designation in the future Land Use Plan'for Hound C. Development, Schedule: 1. A development schedule shall be attached to this application.providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. 2. Estimate of cost of. the project: $ O. Den~ity (for reslde~tial developments only): 1. Number of structures: 2. Dwelling Units Per Structure: a. Number of type: · . Efficiency ' 2 Bedroom 3. Lot area per dwelling unit: ~. Total lot area: IV. Effects'of the Proposed Use A. 1 Bedroom 3'Bedroom List Impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, In- cluding, but not limited to traffic, noise, Tight, smoke/odor, parking, and, describe the steps taken to mlt. igate or eliminate the impacts. March 13, 'i984 RESOLUTION NO. 84-32 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT ' FOR A CABINET SHOP AND SAILBOARD STORAGE AND SALES CENTER - PID ~13-117-2q 33 0005 WHEREAS, a B-1 commercial site located at 5555 Shoreline Boulevard and described as "Lot 2 and W 45 ft front an.d rear of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision No. 170", Plat 61290/Parcel 0500, PID ~13-118-24 33 0005, has owners/tenants requesting approval of. a conditional use permit to operate a cabinet shop and sailboard storage and sales center; and '~ WHEREAS, Section 23.625.3 of the Mound Zoning Ordinance permits such as conditional uses; and WHEREAS, the Uniform Building' Code Table 5-B requires a 4 hour fire rated separation between the H-3 w6odworking shop and the A-B restaurant occupancy; and WHEREAS, the building is fullY sprinklered; and WHEREAS, the Board of Appeals finding under the provi- sions of the State Building Code Section 105 allows for alternate methods and materials. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RE$OEVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the Conditional Use Permit for a cabinet shop and sailboard storage and sales center in the rear portion of 5555 Shoreline Blvd. upon the conditions that: No outside storage' of any materials will be permitted. No painting, staining, varnishing or similar activity will be permitted on the premises. No space within, either business shall be subleased or used by another party in any manner. 5. Expansion of the floor area of either business shall not occur without modification of the conditional use'permit. The alternate fire separation between the A-3 restaurant and H-3 woodworking shop w'ill be reduced from a 4 hour occupancy separation to a 2 hour fire rated assembly und~er the Uniform Building Code provisions for partition walls and structural members with a sound rating of 50 decibels. March 13, 1984 The £oregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Couneilmember Jessen. The £ollowing Councilmember$ voted in the a££irmative: Jessen, Paulsen, ?eterson and ?olston. The followtn8 Counoilmembers voted in the ne~ative: none. Coun¢tlmember Charon was absent and excused. Attest: City Clerk Mayor If'Co · ' CASE NO. 87-641 AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN LAND~ FROM MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-4) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2). The City of Mound does ordain: The City of Mound Zoning Map as revised 1/2/87 is hereby amended as follows: Property described as LOTS 10-37, BLOCK 11, Seton; Lots 6-8, Block 1, Setoh and Lots 1-9, Block 2, Seton is hereby deleted from the Multi-Family Residential (R-4) distirct; and Property described as Lots 10-37, Block 11, Seton; Lots 6-8, Block 1, Seton and Lots 1-9, Block 2, Seton is hereby added to the Single-Family Residential (R-2) district. The Zoning Map of the City on file with the dity Clerk is hereby amended in accordance with these rezoning provisions. Mayor Attest: City Clerk 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 TO: Planning Co~issio~ and Staff FROM: .Mark Koegler, City Planner ~ D~TE: June 2, 1987 SUBJECT: Rezon~ng and Comprehensive Plan Amendment CASE NO: 87-641 ~S FILE NO: 87-310-A23-ZO APPLI~: Norman T. Berglund LOCATION: 4622-4658 Kildare Road EXISTING ZONING: Multi-family Residential (R-4) (3OMPRJ~SIVE PLAN: Multi-Family Residential ~AL: The applicant is proposing to rezone 28 lots from R-4 to R-2 with the intention of selling the property for the development of single-family residences. All of the land surrounding the existing R-4 zone is presently zoned R-2. Due to. the configuration of the lots (see enclosed map), the property can be divided into a maximum of 10 building sites under R-2 zoning. The stacked tier of lots in Block 11, Seton, provides building parcels which are approximately 40 feet by 200 feet which exceeds the 6000 square foot minimum lot size. Additionally, many of the lots will have lots on Black Lake attached to them providing docking rights. The applicant has also petitioned for the vacation of Longford Road which, although a separate case, is closely related to this request. Vacation of Lo~gford Road would result in seven contiguous lots with average dimensions of 40 feet by 340 feet. The existing R-4 zoning provisions allow single-family detached uses. Since the existing lots are Lots of Record, required setbacks under the R-4 zone are 10 feet on one sideyard and six feet on the other. Lots of Record in the R-2 zone are permitted to have two 6-foot sidelrard setbacks. Since the lots are only 40 feet wide, the applicant is trying to maximize the allowable building area. OOMMENTS: In order for the property to be rezoned, either conditions must have changed or a mistake had to have occurred in the original zoning designation. For approximately the past 10 years, the applicant has been attempting to market the property for a multi-family use. Due to market conditions, the effort has been unsuccessful. The applicant feels that single- family homes in the area would be more marketable. From the City'.s perspective, single-family homes would also be lower density in an area which has very narrow rights-of-way and streets. Kildare Road provides existing street frontage to four of the 10 lots. These four lots will be developed as Phase I with the development of the remaining lots requiring the westward extension of Kildare Road. Utility extensions to serve the second phase will also be necessary. Mr. Berglund's proposed rezoning comprises a m~jority, but not all of the R-4 zoned land along Kildare Road. Rezoning of only Mr. Berglund's holdings would result in small spot-zoned areas on both the east and west sides of the subject property. In order to alleviate this situation, it is suggested that the rezoning review include all of the existing R-4 land in the immediate vicinity. The Planning Co~mnission could recommend that 'the City Council's publ~ic hearing focus on the entire R-4 area rather than only on the property under Mr. Berglund's ownership. ~ATION: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning from R-4 to R-2 and amendment of the comprehensive plan designation from multiple-family to single-family residential for the property .subject to the following c~ndi t ions: The Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment shall include all of the R-4 designated land along Kildare Road. The City .Engineer shall review the proposed lots to ensure that the provision of streets and utilities is feasible. Lots shall front on an approved public street prior to the issuance of a building permit. Review of the "Lot of Record" status by the City Attorney. · ,0· ff ° & S · · (,4~, 'i $? B£AGK Property owned by Mr. Bergland ~'1 f..2 Planning Commission H|nutes June 8, 1987 Case No. 87-641 PUBLIC [~_ARING on proposed ZonlngMapAmendment to change zoning from R-4Multi-Family to R-2, Single.Family Residential of Lots 6-8, Block 1, Lots 3-6f Block 2, Lots ll-20.and 27-36, Block 11, all in Seton. Applicant Norman Berglundwas present. The City PlannerMark Koegler reviewed his report on the proposal to rezone 28 lots frcm R-4 %o R-2 with thespecific intention of selling the property for devel°lament of single 'family residences;'under the R-2 zoning, prop~.rty can be divided into a maximum of 10 building sites (40 by 200 feet .deep). Additionally, aS'applicant has also petitioned for a %-acationof Longford Road and part of Kerry Lane; if granted, many of the lots will have lots attached to them on Black Lake and would result in their being 340 feet deep. Koegler stated Mr. Bergland's land comprises the .majority of R-4 land, but does. not include all of it whichwould result in a number of little spot zoned parcels and suggested the C~,~ission could recu~L~nd the City Council's public hearing be published as one that would focus on'rezoning that entire areaof R-4 to possibly R-2. The staff reco~nds approval of the rezoning and also amending the comprehensive plan designation from multiple-family to single family residential for the property subject to the 4 conditions in .the Planner's report. The Chairman opened the public hearing. The following persons had cou,aents and generally objected to the rezoningbecause of the density and narrow- ness of the proposed parcels: JIM KUTZNER, JIM LANIEL, SALLY BOSIGER, HAROLD KUTZNER and GORDON WOLF. NORMANBERGLUND stated all the lots are 40 foot wide; they are requesting R-2 Single Family Residential Zoningbecause that zoning is all around this area of R-4; they also want to reduce the require- ment for side yard setbacks from 10 feet and 6 feet (R-4 requirement) to 6 feet on both sides which is allowed in R-2 Zoning for lots of record in order to allow the maximum building area on the lots. As there were no others wishing to be heard, the Chairman closed the public hearing. The Commission discussed the proposal andhadvarious co~,u,entsandquestions. including possibly changing zoning to larger lots, such as R-1 with 60 foot frontage required on the right-of-way. Some c~uents were that R-1 would be spot zoning just as much as the R-4 seems to be; a variance from the LMCDwould be required to put a dock on 40 foot wide lots, etc. The staff .noted that there was a plan drafted during the road improvement to provide street access and utilities to the remainder of those lots in the future and this or some plan would have to be put in place before those lots would be issued building permits. Smith moved and Thai seconded a motion to reco~,end to the City Council to hold a public hearing on rezoning the entire R-4 area to R-2 Single Family Residential Zoning_.a~_.~...~ur_.~h...er_P0i~_gUt to_.~ CitY ~ouncil that the official hearing .area will need to be expanded. _ .......... [ 'LThevote was Meyer and Weiland oppo-~-e~/-a'i'i'~6~ in'fav6~'' Motio~carried. The Council will be asked to set the public hearing for July 14, 1987. °27/~ii'~!'! CITY OF HOUND Fee Paid ~2o0 '~--- ~;" i:' O~.te Filed ~-~ "~7 ........ (Please type the following information) 1. Street Address of Property ~g~a ~rt~rA 2. Legal Oescript~on of Property: Lot Addi ~lon ~o~_~ ~ ~],c~l Address I~o,~ ~o~En~> ,f~'~ , Applicant (if other than owner): Name Address Day Phone No. 5. Type of Request: ( ) Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation $ Review (') Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. (~) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit (~)*Other *If other, specify: i~resent Zoning District' Existing Use(s) of Property Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? ~.' ~.' If so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Hound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining'and removing such no ti ces .as .may be requi red b~y~law.. //~4~~ ~~~.~,,~(/,.~ SigA~ture Of App.iicant . , _ Date~-~-~-~' PI'arming Commission Recommendation: Date Council Action: Resolution No. Iffg Date blR9 Procedure for Zoning Amendments (2) Case D, Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc.' E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any'additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections III.An Amendment to the Zonin~ Ordinance (Answer either A or B below) mo It is requested-that Section as follows: of the Zoning Ordinance be amended Reason for 'Amendment: Note: Amendment to Map: It is requested, that the property described below and shown on the attached site plan be rezoned from. ~-~- to ~-~_ . Address of Property: z/-/,~3,~ ?-/~r~v¢~ ~~ ~/J~,~t'~ ~ Legal description of property (lot, block, subdivision or metes and bounds) Attach additional sheets, if necessary) present Use of Property: Reason for Amendment: d,/~p~.~,e No application of a property owner for an amendment to the text of the ordi- nance or the zoning ~ap shall be considered by the Planning Commission within one year period following a denial of such request. CITY OF HOUND HOUND, HINNESOTA CASE NO, 87-6h6 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED VACATION OF PORTION OF'.LONGFORD ROAD' BETWEEN KINGS LANE AND BLACK LAKE LANE (WEST SIDE OF LOT 23 TO EAST'SIDE OF LOT lO, BLOCK ii, SETON) AND THAT PORTION OF KERRY LANE NORTH FROH LONGFORD TO.WHOH IT HAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that there:w?.1] 'be a public hearing at. the'Hound City Ha!l, $341.Haywood Road, Hound, Hinnesota, at 7:30 P..H. on Tuesday, the l~th day of July, 1987, to consider the vacation of a portion of Longford Road between Kings Lane and Black Eake Lane'(West side of Lot 23 to East side of Lot 10, Block il, Seton), and that portion'of Kerry Lane North from Longford'Road. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above will be heard at this meeting. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk i~~. McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc, 12800 Industrial Park Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55441 612/559-3700 1-800-328-8322 ExL 784 June ~, .1.~87 Engineers Planners Surveyors Jan Bertrand Planning & Zoning City of Mound 5341 Haywood Rd. Mound, MN 55364 SUBOECT: Street Vacation Longford Road & Kerry Lane Case ~87-646, HKA File #211~ Dear 3an: As requested, we have reviewed the the proposed vacation of a portion of Longford Road between Blocks i and 2 and Block lJ, Seton and Kerry Lane from Longford Road to the lake and have the following comments and recommendations. We would suggest that the City consider for vacation all of the right-of-way for Longford Road between Black Lake Lane and Kings Lane. At the present time, this platted R/W is not used by the City for either street purposes or City utilities and it appears it would not be feasible for such use in the future. All the lots in Blocks i and 2 adjacent to the proposed vacation are owned by the same parties that own the properties in Block ll, with the exception of Lots i and 2, Block 2. These two lots are owned by separate individuals who do not own any Other property in the vacinity. For the City to: completely vacate this street right-of-way, they would be denying these owners access to their property, even though both lots are completely in the flood plain. In discussing this matter with Jim Fackler of the Parks Department, we have learned that there are designated dock sites within the Kerry Lane R/W, but these sites are presently not used. From the information we have, it appears the City should not vacate Kerry Lane if they wish to retain dock sites in this area and if Longford Road is vacated, the City would need to retain some type of easement for pedestrian access to Kerry lane and also Lots i and 2, Block 2. A 15 foot wide easement would be more then adaquate for pedestrian access. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron Planning Commissi.on Hinutes June 8, 1987 e Case No. 87-646 PUBLIC HEARING on proposed vacat%0~.of portion of Longford Road and Kerry~ane north from Longford Applicant Norman Berglundwas present. .. .The City Planner noteed that the City Engineer had put together some comnents on the proposaltovacate Longford Road between Black Lake Lane and Kings Lane; it is not.usable for public right-of-way and lpart of it is below the Flood.Plain elevation. The City has dock sites on Kerry Lane and Lots i and 2, Block 2, Seton are under separate ownership, .The City.Engineer had stated a 15 foot wide easement would be adequate for pedestrian access. .. The Chairman opened the public.hearing and as no one responded, he closed the public hearing. The Cc~mission questionedwhatbenefit'therewould be to vacate street. Koegler stated it almost becomes a legal issue that you would make those lots contiguous rather than have public right-of-way runnin in the middle of'them. C~,~,ission discussed it was probably a matter of, making lakeshore lots out of them for dockage. Mr. Berglandhas tried to purchase Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Seton. Weiland moved and Sohns seconded a mo~ion to rec~,end denial of the re- quested vacation. The vote was Smith opposed and all others in favor of the denial. Reason givenwas that it was not needed for access or lot area to make buildable sites and a concern for protection of public docks and to give the City some say in what future marina development might be. The public hearing will ~e set for July 14, i987. LEGAL DESCRIPTIO~ CASE APPLICATION FOR STREET VACATION CITY OF HOUND FEE .7- ~4~. ~ ¢/~,, X ............ DATE OF PROPERTY OWNED'BY APPLICANT: PID # 87-646 NO. $150.00 FILED .f'-~4 c *'~"7 LOT STREET TO BE VACATED o'F- ~+ /l~.l~/otk /I4 , ' .... REASON FOR REaUEST . TEL. NO. 'Applicant's Interest in Property' / ,, Residents and owners of property abutting the. street to be vacated: (Please;attach lis~..Cert[fled mailing list'canbe obtained from Hennep|n County.by calling 3h8-3271') Recommended by Ut|]ities: NSP~; Hinnegasco ; Recommended by City: Public Works I~K.. ; Fire Chief Chief ; Other Departments- Continental Telephone ; Engineer Police Planning'Commission Recommendation: Date Council Action Resolution No.' Date CITY OF HOUND Mound, Minnesota CASE NO. 87-644 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAR.lNG ON THE APPLICATION TO AMEND CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT TO ALLOW BAIT AND TACKLE SALES.AT 4831 SHORELINE BOULEVARD PID NO. 13-117-24 44 0014 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that. o~?Ues.daY,.Ju]¥ 14, .]987, at_7:30 P.M. at the Mound Clty Hall, 5341Maywood Road, Mound,Minnesota, a hearing will be he]d to consider the. application for amending the condlt'ional use permit to allow bait and tackle sales with exi'~:'.lng serviCe'stat_l".on' at 483] shc~reline Boulevard on sit~e legally described as follows: Lots 1 through 4 inclusive and Northeasterly 0.75 of Lot 5, also Lot 21 and that. part of Lot 20 lying Easterly of the Westerly 0.75 feet thereof including adjacent vacated alley, Block 1, Sh|rley Hills Unit A; PID No. 13-117-24 44 0014 All persons appearing' at said hearing will be given an Opportunity to be heard. F~a-n~erte C. Clark, City Cl~rk 75 YEARS July 6, 1987 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYVVOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 Mr. Thomas Kelly 4831 Shoreline Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Kelly: You were notified on April 28, 1987 that building, plumbing, heating and wiring permits are required for the remodeling being done at 4831 Shore- line Boulevard. To date, you have not submitted blueprints which can be approved by the Inspection Department. You must submit an application with blueprints within 5 days and pay a double fee for any buJlding per- mit, after plan approval, under the provisions of the Building Code Section 304. ! have attached an "Information Necessary to Obtain a Permit" handout for your convenience. You also have a portable sign which is in violation of City Code Section 365. We had discussed converting this sign to a permanent free-standing sign which'has not been done to date. This changeable lettered portable sign is to be removed within 24 hours. If you have questions regarding this compliance notice, contact me as soon as you receive this notice. Your conditional use permit is scheduled for public hearing on July 14, 1987. The Inspection Department will take action to have the building addition removed if you fail to comply by the July 14, 1987 CUP hearing. Yours truly, Building Official JB/ms 87/98 .~ cc: ~l~dward Shukle, City Manager Jim Larson, City Attorney F. ebruary 10, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87-27 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A coNDITIONAL USE PEREIT FOR OPERATION OF A VEHICLE IMPOUNDMENT AREA AND SERVICE STATION?VEHICLE REPAIR (MINOR) FACILITY AT 4831 SHORELINE BOULEVARD, PID #13-117-24 4k 0014 P & Z CASE #86-567 WHEREAS, the City Council on February 10, 1985 held a public hearing pursuant to Section 23.505 of the Mound Code of Ordinances, to consider the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for PID %13-117-24-440014 for the operation of a vehicle impoundment area; and W~EREAS, the use of the subject property PID %13-117-24-440014 is governed by three previous conditional use permits 70-302, 70-302A and 70-302B; and -' WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Mound City Council to .consolidate the previous permits and combine them with the permit for'operation of the impoundment area; and WHEREAS, the subject property is within the B-2, General Business Zone which allows motor fuel stations, minor auto repair and associated vehicle storage by conditional use permit; and W~EREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and Goes · reccxrmer~ approval; and WHEREAS, all persons wishing to be heard were heard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the conditional use permit is hereby granted for the following uses: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Motor Fuel Station Minor Automotive Repairs Valve Jobs Tire Repairs Service Maintenance on Automobiles Gas Welding Vehicle Impoundment Area BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforementioned uses shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. No major mechanical overhauls shall occur on the premises. 2. All .wrecked, abandoned and impounded vehicles shall be stored within the fenced enclosure. RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION AUTH~ZI~ A CDNDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF A VEHICLE IMPOUNDMENT AREA, SERVICE STATION/VEHICLE REPAIR (MINOR) FACILIT~ AND SALES OF SMALL MISCELLANEOUS FISHING TACKLE AND LIVE BAIT AT 4831 SHORELINE BOULEVARD, PID 913-117-24 44 0014, P & Z CASE % 87-644 WHEREAS, the City Council on June 23, 1987, held a public hearing pursuant to Section 23.505 of the Mound Code of Ordinances, to consider the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for PID %13-117-24-440014 for the sale of · small miscellaneous fishing tackle and live bait; and WHEREAS, the use of the subject property PID %13-117-24-440014 is governed by four previous Conditional Use Permits 70-302, 70-302A, 70-302B and 87-27; and wHEREAS, it is the desire of the Mound City Council to consolidate the previous permits and combine them with the permit for sales of small miscellaneous fishing, tackle and live bait; and ~... "' WHEREAS, the subject property is within .the B-2, General Business Zone which allows motor fuel stations, retail sales, minor auto .repair and associated vehicle storage by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request and does recommend approval; and WHEREAS, all persons wishing to be heard were heard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the Conditional Use Permit is hereby granted for the following uses: me 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8.' Motor Fuel Station Minor Automotive Repairs Valve Jobs Tire Repairs Service Maintenance on Automobiles Gas Welding Vehicle Impoundment Area Sales of Small Miscellaneous Fishing Tackle and Live Bait ~E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforementioned uses shall be subject to the following conditions: No major mechanical overhauls shall occur on the premises. All wrecked, abandoned and impounded vehicles shall be stored within the fenced enclosure. ~ R.etail sales shall be limited to live_bait and the sales of small miscellaneous fishing tackle only,~ales of fishing equipment, --~--~-~--~ ......... ~ ,~ 1~-~ L_ ~ reels, boats, motors and tra lle~ s~11 ~ exp~ssly ~oh~b~t~. All signage for the business shall be brought into conformance with the Mound Sign Ordinance. Existing illegal temporary signs shall be removed immediately. ~(L~ 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553.1950 TO: PL. nning Commission and Staff FROM: "Mark Koegler, City Planner DATE: June 2, 1987 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit CASE NO: 87-644 VHS F~R NO: 87-310-A24-ZO ~CANT: Tom 'Kelly (Unocal 76) LOCATIoN: 7831 Shoreline Boulevard EXISTING ~ONING: General Business (B-2) (DMPRf2{EgSIVE PLAN: Commercial PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting modification of his existing Conditional Use Permit to allow bait sales. Bait sales are retail sales which are permitted uses in the B-2 zone. Since the principal use of the property is a motor fuel station which is allowed as a conditional use, any changes in the business require modification of the Conditional Use Permit. Recently, the applicant constructed an addition at the rear of the existing service station to house bait tanks and an office area. In the early stages of construction, the activity was detected by the building inspector and the applicant was informed that the Conditional Use Permit would need to be modified. Subsequently, the Conditional Use Permit application was received. COMMENTS: Bait sales are essentially an accessory business activity which will not generate significant amounts of traffic or require extensive parking. As lon9 as bait sales are limited to strictly live bait, the proposed use should not have a negative impact on the existing area and the surrounding road system. .2.004 RECE'IVED JU ,) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit to include the sale of bait subject to the following conditions: Bait sa~es shall be limited to live bait and sales of fishing equipment including but not limited to rods, reels, boats, motors and trailers shall be expressly prohibited. All gionaoe for the service ~tation mhall be brought into conformance with the Mound Sign Ordinance. Existing illegal temporary signs shall be removed immediately. Planning Commissi. on Minutes June 8, 1987 .9. Case.No. 87-644. PUBLIC NEARING on the application to amend conditional use' · permit to allow bait and.'tackle:sales With existing service station at 483-1Sh°rellne Boulevard; Lots 1-4, 21 and part of Lots 5 and 20, Block 1, Shlr16y N111s Unlt A Applicant, Tom Ke11% was present. The City Planner revlewed his. report and that staff .~ecommends approval of" the Conditional Use Permit to include the sale of ha.it with two conditions: 1) Ba~t'sales be limited to live bait and sales of fishing equlpmen~ includ- ing but not limited to rods, reels, boats.', motors and boats expressly pro- hibited; and 2) Alt signage for service station shall be brought into con- formance with the Mound-Sign Ordinance. Existing illegal temporary signs ~hall be removed immediately. The Comnission diScussed that the word "only" should be added after "... live bait" in Condition'l. The Chairman oPened the public hearing. Applicant Tom Kelly stated when he made the.request, he'inte~ded.:.~'to have small amount of bait and miscel- laneous tackle items. They intend to'be service oriented and also supply customers with small convenience items such as small fishing tackle; they don't have room.to sell those bigger items. As no other persons wished to be heard, the Chairman Closed the public hearing. Reesemoved and Jensen seconded a motion to rec~L,~nd approving an amended conditional use permit to include live bait and sale of small .fishing tackle expressly.exempting sale of rods, reels, boats, motors and trailers. The wote was unanimously in favor. The City Council will'set a public hearing for July~ 14, 1987. '"~'r71~5 , CITY OF HOUND ~ .~ ii, ~ , , ,, . , ' ~[~ PELICATION TO PLANNING S ZONING COHHISSION [..--, . %,.- ,.,~v~ ,-a~,ease type the following infor~tion) Leg i O iption of P op ty: Lot I /ZO Applicant (if other than owner) Name ~"~ /~C~ //Y Address ¥~ 7 / /~ ~ /'~ Case No. Fee Pa i d~J~ ~ O. ~ 0 Date Filed ' Block / Day Phone No. Type of Request: ( ) Variance (~ Condltional / - ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review (') ~etland Permit ( ) P.U.D. Use Permit (..) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other *If other, specify: ~resent ~oning District 8-~- .... 8. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditlonal use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? .~>/~- ~ If so, list d~(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s)~, Copie previ6us resolutions ~ha11 accompany present request. I certify that all of the above statements and the statements containe~ in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the enLry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Hound for the purpose o~ inspecting, or of posting, maintaining'and removing Such Sign&ture of Applicant Date ~-' Planning Commission Recommendation: - Date 6-8-87 Council Action: Resolution No. Date 7-1~-87 for Conditional Use Permit (2) D. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction. -' F. Any additionpl information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and appllcable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. III Request for a Conditional Use A. All information requested below, a site plan as described in Part II, and a development schedule providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the construction must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Type of development for which a Conditional Use Permit is requested: 1. Conditional Use (Specify): ~/,'77. ~...¥_~¢/~.~/~ ~ ~;' . 2. Current ~ni.ng a~d Deslgn~tlon in the future Land Use Plan for Mound · C. Oevelopment'Schedule: 1..A development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. 2. Estimate of cost of. the project: $ ~4~.~E.~ O. -DenSity (for residential-developments only): 1. Number of structures: 2. Dwelling Units Per Structure: a. Number of type: Efficiency · 2 Bedroom 3. Lot area per dwelling unit: /4. Total lot area: IV. Effects of the ProPosed Use Bedroom Bedroom List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, in- cluding, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and, describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. £ebruary 10, 1~87 RESOLUTION NO. 87-27 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZIN& A CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT FOR OPERATION OF A VEHICLE IHPOUNDHENT AREA AND SERVICE STATION?VEHICLE REPAIR (HINOR) FACILITY AT q8~1 SHORELINE BOULEVARD, PID #13-117-2q 4~ OO14 e · z CASE #86-567 WHEREAS, the City Council on February 10, 1985 held a public hearing pursuant to Section 23.505 of the Mound Code of Ordinances, to cooside;~ the issuance of a Conditional Ose Permit for PID %13-117-24-440014 for the o~eration of a vehicle impoundment area; and ~'WHEREAS, the use of the subject property PID %13-117-24-440014 i~ governed by three previous c~nditional use permits 70-302, 70-302A and 70.-302B; and ' " WHEREAS, 'it is the desire of the Mound City Council to .consolidate previous permits and combine them with the permit for'operation of the impoundment area; and WHEREAS, the subject property is within the B-2, General Business Zone which allows motor fuel stations, minor auto repair and associated vehicle storage by conditional use permit; and W~EREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and ~oes · recc~me~ approval; ar~ WHEREAS, .all persons wishing to be heard were heard. NC)W, THERe, BE IT RESOLV~ by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the conditional use permit is hereby granted for the foil.owing uses: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6, 7. Motor Fuel Station Minor Automotive Repairs Valve Jobs Tire Repairs Service Maintenance on Automobiles Gas Welding Vehicle Impoundment Area BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforementioned uses shall be subject to the- following conditions: 1. No major mechanical overhauls shall occur on the premises. 2. Ail .wrecked, abandoned and impounded vehicles shall be stored within the fenced enclosure. February 10, 1987 Storage within the fenced area shall include only abandoned, wrecked and impounded vehicles referred by the Mound Police Department and vehicles resulting from normal business repair operations. 47~ Storage and sales of used auto pacts shall be exFcessl¥ FcohLbtted. $.~ Wooden fencing shall be maintained in good cor~ition at all times and worn · ' or broken boards shall be replaced immediately. 6~.4 Ro signage shall be p/aced on any fenc. ing. ~7~.~ Gates shall be closed at all times except when .transferr/n~ vehicles ~nbo and. out of ~ enclosed ~8(. \~ The conditional use permit shall be reviewed annually. ~. There shal 1 be'no boa:. st6rage on the p'r~nlses. APPlicable provisions of Resolutions 70-302, '70-302A and 70-302B are hereby incorporated into this permit resolution rendering the "three previous resolutions null and void. The fo{egoing resolution,was ~oved by Counc;lmember Jessen and seconded by .Councl lmember Jensen. The'followi'ng C~uncilmembers voted in the afflrmatlve= · ' Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Attest: City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUIION AUTHORIZING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OPERATION ~F A VEHICLE IMPOUNDMENT AREA, SERVICE STATION/VE~I~R REPAIR (MINOR) FACILITY AND SAT~ OF SMALL MISCELLANfDUS FISHING TACKLE AND LIVE BAIT AT 4831 SHORELINE BOULEVARD, PID %13-117-24 44 0014, P & Z CASE % 87-644 WHEREAS, the City Council on June 23, 1987, held a public hearing pursuant to Section 23.505 of the Mound Cod~ of Ordinances, to consider the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for PID %13-117-24-440014 for the sale of '.~\~small miscellaneous fishing tackle and live bait; and WHEREAS, the use of the subject property PID %13-117-24-440014 i~ governed by four previous Conditional Use Permits 70-302, 70-302A, 70-302B and ., 87-27 . . ;. and ~ WHEP~S, it is the de. sire of the Mound Cxty Council to consolidate the w'~previous permits .and combine them wit. h the permit for sales of small ~ ,~miscellaneous fishing tackle and live bait; and ...-.' ~w~ W~ww' the ~bject property is within .the B-~' General Business Zone ~,'~. h'ch allo s .motor fuel station.s, retail sales, minor auto repair and ~3~ssociated vehicle storage by Conditional Use Permit; and ' ~ WHEREAS, Commission reviewed the request and does recommend and \ WHEREAS, to be heard' were heard. by the City Council of the City of Mound, Permit i~\herol~2' c~'~nt~ for~the folll:~tng · ~ ' · '%. ~%~ Minor Automotive Repairs ~-~ _~1~ ~%. ~ .%'~ ~~/~,.~· ' Tire.Re~i~s ~<% .~ ~ ~ ~% ~ ~ Z~~ent ~ea ~ ' ~ ,les of ~11 Mis~l~neous Fishing ~ckle a~ Live ~it FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforementioned uses shall be subject to condi t ions: major mechanical overhauls shall' occur o~ the premises. wrecked, abandoned and impounded vehicles shall be stored the fenced enclosure. Retail sales shall be limited to live. miscellaneous fishing tackle ~11 be and the sales of small of fishing equipment reels, boats, motors and signage for the business shall be brought into conformance the Mound Sign Ordinance. Existing illegal temporary signs be removed immediately. ~~. 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 TO: Planning Co,mission and Staff FROM: "Mark Koegler, City Planner DATE: June 2, 1987 ~: Co~ditior~l Use Permit CASE NO: 87-644 V~3S _F~R NO: 87-310-A24-ZO APPLICANT: Tom Kelly (Unocal 76) LOCATION: 7831 Shoreline Boulevard EXISTING ZONING: General BusJ_ness (B-2) ~SIVE PLAN: Commercial PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting modification of his existing Co~ditional Use Permit to allow bait sales. Bait sales are retail sales which are permitted uses in the B-2 zone. Since the principal use of the property is a motor fuel station which is allowed as a conditional use, any changes in the business require modification of the Conditional Use Permit. Recently, the applicant constructed an addition at the rear of the existing service station to house bait tanks and an office area. In the early stages of construction, the activity was detected by the building inspector and the applicant was informed that the Conditional Use Permit would need to be modified. Subsequently, the Conditional Use Permit application was received. OOMMENTS: Bait sales are essentially an accessory business activity which will not generate significant amounts of traffic or require extensive parking. As long as bait sales are limited to strictly live bait, the proposed use should not have a negative impact on the existing area and the surrounding road system. 33, Eebruar¥ 10, 1)BT RESOLUTION NO. 87-27 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ~A CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT FOR OPERATION OF A VEHICLE IMPOUNDMENT AREA AND SERVICE STATION?VEHICLE REPAIR (MINOR) FACILITY AT ~831 SHORELINE BOULEVARD, PID #13-117-2q ~q O01q P & Z CASE ~86-567 WHEREAS, the City Council on February 10, 1985 held a pUblic hearLng pursuant to 'section. 23.505 of the Mound Code of Ordinances, to consider the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for FID %13-117-24-440014 for the opezation of a vehicle impoundment area; and 'WHEREAS, the use of the subject property PID %13-117-24-440014 governed by ~ previous c~ndit~onal use permits 70-302, 70-302A and 70-302B; WHEREAS, it is the. desire of the Mound City Council tm .consolidate the Previous permitSaa~ combzne them with th~ permit for'oPeration of the impoundment area; WHEREAS, the subject property is within the B-2, General Business Zone which a/lows motor fuel stations, minor auto repair and associated vehicle storage by conditional use permit; and ._ '' W~EREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and ~toes · re--rd approval; ar~ W6EREAS, all persons wishing to ks heard were heard. NC)W, T~, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the conditional use permit is hereby granted for the following uses: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.' Vehicle Motor Fuel Station Minor Automotive Repairs Valve Jobs Tire Repairs Service Maintenance on Automobiles Gas Welding Impoundment Area BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforementioned uses shall be subject to the. following conditions: 1. No major mechanical overhauls shall occur on the premises. 2. Ail .wrecked, abandoned and impounded vehicles shall be stored within the fenced enclosure. e February 10, 1987 Storage within the fenced area shall in¢lucle on1¥ abandoned, w:ecked and impounded vehicles referred by the Mound Police Department and vehicles resulting from normal business repair operations. Storage and sales of used auto parts shall be eXpressly prohibited~ Wooden fencing shall be maintained in good condition at all times and worn or broken boards shall be replaced immediately. No signage shall be placed on any fenqing. Gates shall be closed at all times eXcept when .transferring vehicles into and. out of the enclosed area. The conditional use permit shall be reviewed annually. There shall be-no boa:. storage on the p'r~mises. Applicable provisions of Resolutions 70-302, 70-302A and 70-302B are hereby incorporated into this permit resolution rendering the "three previous resolutions null and void. The fo~egoing reso. lution,was ~oved by Councilmember Jessen and seconded by .Councl Imember Jensen. The'followl'ng C~uncilmembers voted in the affirmative: · ' Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Attest: City C)erk do/.?.. ts~i = ~ ,17'16 NORTHERN CO~ ........... !. July 14, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION REALLOCATING YEARS iII & llII MOUND/URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS WHEREAS, pursuant to notice being given, a public hearing was held in accordance with Title ] of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, on July ]4, ]987, at 7:30 P.M. in the Mound City Council Chambers; and WHEREAS, this public hearing was held to obtain views of citizens on local and Urban Mennepin County housing, community and economic development and to provide the citizens with the opportunity to comment on the City of Mound proposed reallocation of funds in its Years XII & XIII Hennepin County Block Grant Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the reallocation of the City of Mound's Years XII & XIII Community Development Block Grant Funds as follows: YEAR XII BUDGETED PROJECT ~ BUDGETED EXPENDED 22057 Portion of Reinstated Year iII monies 9,000 -0- TO BE REALLOCA~'~ 9,000.00 YEAR XIII, BUpGETED Rehabilitation of Private Property BUDGETED EXPENDED 11,324 -0- TO BE REALLOCATED 11,000.00 REALLOCATED BALANCE Special Economic Development Project - $20,000.00 The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: July 14, 1987 The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk NOTICE OF HEARING CITY OF HOUND HOUND, "Notice is hereby given that Henneptn County and the Ctty of .HOUND ~11 hold a'publtc hearing to consider a p~oposed a~endmentto PROJECTS XII g funded.in P~ogram'¥earsx~ under Title ! of the Houstng and Comuntty Development Act of 1974 as amnded, A Ctttzen Participation Plan is available at Clty Hall to assfst fn your participation in the hearing. The heartng is to be held on ~duly 14, 1987 at 7:30 City Flall located at 5341 Hay~ood Road p.m. 4n the l~ound This publlc heartng ts be~g held pursuant to a Jofnt cooperation agreement between l{ennep~n County and Hound. .14.S. 471.5g." Francene C. Clark, CHC', City ~ierk Pub.llsh in The Laker June 22, 1~)87 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 July 9, 1987 TO:' FROM: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ~?(~, ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER RE: PUBLIC HEARING - CDBG AMENDMENTS YEAR Xll AND XIII The purpose of the public hearing is to accept any public input on whether or not the City should amend its exlstin9 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs. A request has been made for economic development assistance beyond what existing programs provide. The proposed amendments relate to a business relocation within the City of Mound. An existing business has made contact with the City under its CDBG - Economic Development Program and .is attempting to purchase an existing building within Mound and subsequently' build an addition to that building so that the business can continue within the City of Mound. Attached is a summary of t'he financing, program relating to the proposed amendment. I believe the attachment is self'explanatory. At~ached also, is a resolution for you to consider. If you have any questions, please contact me. ES:ls BUSINESSRELOCATION CURRENT AVAILABLE AND APPROVED FUNDS: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) City of Mound Revolving Loan Fund (NEl's repayment of 2~ loan and other 2~ .monies that have been paid) City of Mound Year XlII - Economic Development TOTAL FUNDS CURRENTLY COMMITTED ON A 2~ LOAN BASIS $25,000 515,000 5~O,000 ADDITIONAL FUNDING PROPOSAL: City of Mound Year Xll Reinstated monies (Available for use - not committed to any specific program) City of Mound Year XlII Rehabilitation of Private Property (Specifically committed) TOTAL ADDITIONAL FUNDING 5.9,000 511,OOO $20,000 FINANCING SCHEME: 2~ Interest Loan Under Existing CDBG Economic Development Program Grant Under CDBG for 8" Water Line for Sprinkling System to Existing Building Grant Under CDBG for Assistance for Making Application to the Small Business Adminis- tration (SBA) and for Architectural Services in Design of Building Addition TOTAL FUNDING AVAILABLE'INCLUDING ADDITIONAL FUNDING IF PROGRAMS ARE AMENDED 5~6,500 $10,000 $ 3,500 560,000 CASE NO. 87-643 RESOLUTION 87- RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A SIDE YARD SETBACK.VARIANCE FOR WEST 40 FT. OF LOT 17, SKARP AND LINDQUlST'S ADDITION; 49XX EDGEWATER DRIVE; PID 13-117-24 41 0062 WHEREAS, John Peterson, owner of the property, has requested a 4 foot side yard variance and a 2 foot front yard variance to allow the construction of a new structure for Lot 17, Skarp and Lindquist's Addition; and WHEREAS, the City Code requires a 10 foot setback for newly platted lots in the R-2 single family residential district' and a 20 foot setback to accessory buildings on lakeshore lots; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend a 2 foot side yard variance to the east and west property lines with the accessory building requiring conforming 20 foOt setback. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT REsOLvED that ~he City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota does.hereby concur with the Planning Commission recommendation to allow an 8 foot side yard setback to the east and west property line to allow the owner reasonable use of his property and finds the requested setbacks consistent with the area for Lot 17, Skarp and LIndquist's; PID #13-117-24 41 0062. CASE NO. 87-643 TO:. Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official ~ Planning Commission Agenda of June 8, 1987 CASE NO. 87-643 APPLICANT: John Peterson LOCATION: 49XX Edgewater'Drive LEGAL DESC.: West 40 feet of Lot 17, Skarp and Lindquist's Ravenswood Addition; PID No. 13-117-24 41 0062 SUBJECT: Side yard setback variance EXISTING ZONING: R-2 Single Family Residential' The applicant is r[questing a 4.foot side yard variance to ai'low construction of a new home w|thin 6 feet of the side lot line and a detached garage within 18 feet from the 'front property line. The Zoning Ordinance for the existing vacant lot requires a 10 foot side yard to both property lines. R-2 District for newly subdivided .lots since December of 198i requires 10 foot' setback to the property lines. The Zoning Code also would-require an average setback of homes abutting a public right-of-way, but in no case closer than 20 feet to the front property line. Resolution No. 82-156 divided Lots 16 and 17 since the present Zoning Ordinance was adopted. Thereby, the setbacks must meet the new ordinance requirements of 10 foot to the side lot lines. The Planning Commission should modify the Zoning Ordinance to reduce the requirements on newly platted lots in the R-2 District. The required lot width of 40 feet and the' requirement of 10 foot side yards re- duces the allowable building width to 20 feet. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends revising the current Zoning Ordinance Section 23.605.5 Item 2 to allow 6 foot side yard setbacks for new lots in R-2 District. However, staff.would recommend that the new proposed home on the west 40 feet of Lot 17 have the garage setback of 20 feet in compliance with the Zoning Dis- trict. The abutting neighbors have been notified. This will be referred to the City Council on June 23, 1987. JB/ms P~ann|ng Comm|ss|on M~nute$ June 22, 1~87 Case No. 87-643 Side yard setback.variance for /t~XX Edgewater Drive, W.-40 feet of Lot 17, Skarp ~; Lin.dq~ist~s..Ravenswood;.PID # 13-117-24 41 0062 John Peterson was present. A yarlance request for 6 foot sideyard was continued from the Planning and ~oning Commission meeting' of June"8~ 1~8~. The Chairman explained {he pre- '"vious actl'on by ~he Co~mission.. The applicant has.~t~ted he...-is changing his request from a 6 and lO'foot sideward 'to an'8 and 8 foot sldeyard. Planning Commission discussion f~]'lowed regarding the neighbors~ concern about any posslble change in the'ordinance. The neighbor, John and Judy Zimdars, stated- 'they felt they would not support an ordinance change for a lesser side yard requirement. ..- Motlon by Ken Smith to approve a 2 foot slde yard varlance on the east and' west s|de of the lot, seconded by Frank Wei.land stating that the har'dship is to 'give the 'owner reasonable.-use of the property and is consistent with the area. The vote was unanimous]y in favor.. Plannlng'Commlssion also discussed lot widths, and lots' of record dates, and compli'ance with setbacks-with the staff. Planning C~t,,~ssion Minu%es June 8, 1987 Be Case No..87-6~3 Side yard Setback.variance- for.'/~gXx Edgewater. Drive, West ~0~ feet of'Lot t7, .Ska~p.& Lindqulst's Ravenswood John Paterson was.present,; .... Th~' B'uiidlng..Offlcial explained .her report'on the request for a ~ foot side .yard .variance' to aliow construct]bn.of a new 'home within '6 feet of the side lot 1.1ne.and a detached garage within '18 feet froWn.the front property line. .in 1982, lot was dtvlded'.and it no .longer' is considered a lot of record whlch would al-low"6'foot 'side. yards. .Staff recommends revislng Zoning Ordinance"' to. a11ow'6"foot' side yard...s&tbacks' for new 1ors In the R-2 District; but that the garage setback.requirement of 20 feet 'be maintained. dUDY ZIMOARs and. HARK'LAWRENCE, neighb0rs,?vere present.. Hrs. zimdars stated her husband, dohn, was out' of.to~n and he want, ed to be preSent tonight and' w°ulld like.consideration be deferred' to a later date. when he can &rrange to , be present-, . The.Zlmdars and. Mr..Lawrence do not favor' al.lowing the request, but are wi.lltng to get together to talk.about a solutLon. Applicant mentioned that he thought parcel was /~$ feet wlde when he purchased It. After cons'ilderable discussion of. the problems, the followl'ng action was. taken.' In 'order .to allow neighbors to be heard: AnderSen moved and Weiland seconded a motion to tab1e to the dune 22nd meet-lng.. 'The vote .Was all In favo~ except' Jensen and.Thal who. opposed tabling be%ause they feel we will not be hearing anything' different'from Hr. Zimdars and must make 'the .decision on what we know as we're a govern- ment' of '-1aw,~ not of' people. Case No. ~? Fee Pald -~-0. o · ~ CITY OF HOUND ~ ~': ,A~ lr.-s ~.~ ~,-.f~.:T~~ ~' APPLICATION TO PLANNING S ZONING COHHISSION =. tot 7 _ Add it',on ~~=~~ PlO NO. ~~ 3. O.ner's Name~*k~~¢S~ Day Phone No. q. Applicant '(if other than owner): Name. Day Phone No. Address Type of Request: (~ Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit' (.) Amendment ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) sign Permit (') Wetland Permlt ( ) P.U.D. ( )*Other *If other, specify: ~resent 'Zoning Dist. rict' Existing Use(s) of Property_~~/~~ I ' Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, o~ conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? ~,'~z[~-~-~ ~' If so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken En-~providelResolution No.(s) Copies.of pr&vious resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plan~ t'o be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this app~tion by any authorized official of the City of ~ound for the purpose of inspiring, o/r oTj~oosting, maintaining 'and removing Such notices as may be required_by l~4v//r~'///~//7/~_/4.~ ._ _/ /// .--./.-- /~7 ~ /t~161 ~._/~'! 'v~ r.~ ~ ' - ' I 'Planning commission Reco~l~endation: Date 6-8-87 Council Action: Resolut ion No. Date 6-23-87 Request for Zoni.ng Variance Procedure (2) ~ Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. E. IndiCate North compass direction F. Case Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. I!!..Request for a Zoning Variance A. All information below, a site E!an, as described in Part II, and general appliFation-must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Does the present use of the property conform to all use regulations for the zone district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No ( ) If ~no~, specify each'hon-conforming use: C. Do the existing structures comply with a-ll area height.and bul~_re_q_ulatlons for the zone district in which it is located2 Yes' ( ) No (~(~-~ ' If Hno'~, spAclfy each non-conforming use: '~ - D. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any.of the uses permitted in that zoning district? (~X~) .Too narrow ( ) Topography ( ) Soil '( ) Too small (~) Drainage ( ) "Sub-surface .( ) Too shallow ( ) Shape ( ) Other: Specify: Was the hardship described, above created by ~he action of anyone having property interests}n the-land after 'the Zoni.ng Ordinance was adopted2 Yes ( ) No (/~) If yes, explain: F. Was the hardship created by any @tl~er man-made change, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No~X~) If yes, explaln: Are 'the, conditions of hardship'for'which you request a v~ance peculiar o~ly to the p~operty described in this petition? Yes-(~d/) No ( ) If no, how many o~her properties are similarly affected? What is the "minimum~' modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations ~at will permit you to make reasonable use.of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, If necessary.) I. Will.granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? · June Counc] 1member Ulrick moved the following resolution.. RESOLUTION NO. 82-156 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSIO~ RECOMMENDATION. TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY LOT- SPLIT WITH THE 7 STIPULATIONS - CASE #82-114 WHI~I~EA$, WHEREAS,. a subdivision (lot-split) request has been Yantes on property.describe~ as Lots 16 & 17, Skarp $ Lindquist's Eavenswood, and the request' was.submitted in the manner required for subdividing land under the Hound Ordinance Cod~ and under Chapter.'462 of the Minnesota Statutes and all proceedings have been duly had there- .' under, and WHEREAS, -said proposed subdiv.ision (lot-split) is in all respects consist~nt · ".':,with the City plan and' the regulations and nequirements of the laws of the. State of Minnesota and ordinances of the City.of Mound, Chapter Z~, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has approved the prelJmlnary lot-split 'with the stipulation that the house be brought to compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 23 of the City Codel the shed be removed and meet the other recommendations of the Building Official,- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND: A.. Preliminary Lot-Split Approval Request #82-114, is approved upon. compllance with the following requirements: Yhe house be brought to compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 23 of the City Code, as far as side yard requirements are concerned· ·2. e Locating utilities servicing the existing structure and topography. of the site placed on the survey. All water and sewer'unit charges are. paid, and street assessment unit charges, if applicable. e Removal of the exlsting shed building and basement entrance from the site including the 6" encroachment of the house on Parcel "B". 5. Provide Off-street parking for Parcel "B". 6. Ail persons with financial interest in the property submit approval of the lot-split request. 7. That failure on the part of the petitioner to submit a fln~l plat of the lot-split per Section 22.13 within one'year from the date of this approval shall deem the preliminary approval to be null and void,'unless an extension of time is applied for and approved. ~~' NORTHERN RD 180 l,qf~/~s..3- 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAY~VOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 July 7, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK COSTS TO CONTRACT WITH OTHER THAN HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR ASSESSING SERVICES As requested, I have researched further the costs to contract with other than Hennepin County for assessing services. There are 46 cities in Hennepin County: 1. 14 cities have full time assessors as employees. They are as follows: .' Minneapolis Brooklyn Park Robbinsdale Champlin Maple Grove Eden Prairie Hopkins Crystal St. Louis Park Brooklyn Center Bloomington Minnetonka Plymouth Edina 370,951 43,332 ltl ,422 9,006 20,52.5 16,263 15,336 25,5z13 42,931 31,230 81,831 38,683 31,615 46 ,O73 It appears in looking at the above cities, they are either large cities with a lot of business and industrial areas or small, growing cities with a lot of raw land that is developing rapidly. 2. 13 cities use Hennepin County. They are as follows: St. Bonifacius 857 o Dayton ~, 070 Independence 2,640 Richfield 38,851 Spring Park 1,465 Loretto 297 Minnetrista 3,236 Golden Valley 22,775 New Hope 23,087 St. Anthony 7,981 Tonka Bay 1,354 Medicine Lake 419 Mound 9,280 14 cities are contracting with 5 different private' assessors. They are as follows: Rolf Erlckson - Maple Plain 1,421 Medina 2,623 Excelsior 2,523 Greenfield 1~,391 Orono 6,845 Hassen Township Shorewood 4,646 Corcoran 4,252 Osseo 2,974 I spoke to Mr. Erickson who does not want to take Mound on for assessing. He cautioned us to be very careful when looking for someone to do the assessing because there are a lot of unqualified people out there. His example was Hassen Township who hired someone from outside Hennepin County who was not familiar with the area and put a value of $5,000 on every vacant lot. He has been doing tax rebates for 2 years from what this person did. Steve Hanlin - *Champlin 9,006 Minnetonka Beach 575 Mr. Hanlin has a full time assessing job at the City of Champlin and does Minnetonka Beach on the side. He also was not interested in taking Mound. Ce Jim Shaughnessy - Wayzata * Deephaven - * Greenwood - Woodland 3,621 3.716 Mr. Shaughnessy is a part time city employee here. 653 Mr. Shaughnessy is a part time city employee here. 526 Mr. Shaughnessy did not want to bid against Hennepin County. 2 D. Gerald Hedlund - Rogers 652 Mr. Hedlund has a full time job and does ROgers on the side. E. Alfred Miller - Hanover 6~47 Mr. Miller has a full time job and does Hanover and Franklin Township on the side. I spoke to the City Clerk in Hanover and she reported that Hanover has property in two counties (Wright & Hennepin) and the Council feels having one person assess both the property in Wright and Hennepin Counties is more equal· She did mention that that they provide fire service for parts of several cities done by a private contract assessor and she does have a problem obtaining assessed values from him at fire contract time. * These cities are not counted in private assessing because the person doing them is either employed full time or part time as an employee· 2 other cities with property in 2 counties contract with the county in which most of the property lies for assessing. Rockford - Wright County Chanhassen - Carver County 2,~108 6,359 3 other cities (Greenwood & Deephaven mentioned above) have part time employees: Greenwood - Jim Shaughnessy Deephaven - Jim Shaughnessy Long Lake 1 The conclusion I have come to i.s that there are not that many qualified people out there, (other than the ones that are certified and working in cities at this time), to get bids from. The ones that there are, are not interested in bidding Mound. One of the main points that most of the private contract assessors mentioned was having someone who is familiar with the ~area perform the work. Mound is a very unique city. It has lakeshore and non-lakeshore, very small parcels and large parcels, irregular lots, expensive and inexpensive homes, and for the most part is fully developed. Hennepin County's assessor for our area is Mike McDonald. Mr. McDonald lives in this area and assesses Mound, Spring Park, St. Bonlfacius and Minnetrista. He is very familiar with the area and often uses Mound's Council Chambers for his office, thus giving the citizens access to him by phone and in person. 3 Also please note that our Assessing Contract with Hennepin County states, "...this agreement will continue for an indefinite number of annual terms thereafter, except that the same may be terminated after the initial period of six months' notice, in writing, by either party, such notice to be given on or before July 1 of the year in which either party elects to terminate this agreement." RESOLUTION NO. 87- July 14, 1987 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A OUIT CLAIM DEED TO. SELL CITY PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City of Mound owns the south 36 feet of Lots 13, 14 & 15, Block 33, Wychwood; and WHEREAS, the owner of Lots 6, 7, 8, and the North ~4 feet of Lots 13, 14, & 15, Block 33, Wychwood, has asked that the City sell him the aforedescribed parcel; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has no objection to selling this .City owned land, but retaining a street and utility easement over the South 5 feet of the aforedescribed land and a utility easement over the North 31 feet of the South 36 feet of the aforedescribed land. NOWi'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute a Quit Claim Deed to Gregory L. and Karen K. Sycks for $100.00, plus $100.00 for legal, engineering and State Deed Tax, selling the following described City property: "Lots 13, 14, and 15, except, the northerly ~ feet of said Lots, Block.33, Wychwood, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for the County, retaining to the City of Mound a street and utility easement over the South 5 feet of the aforedescribed premises and a utility easement over the North 31 feet .of the South 36 feet of the aforedescribed premises." The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk ~ No. ~O-M--OUIT C'--A~M DEED ...... --: ~-_~-- C.,.,~:'--"-; ~--~'- (1171) ilk,.4)e~ ~. ~ No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of l~eal Estate Value ( ) fried ( ) not required Certificate of Real Estate Value No. Count7 Auditor by Deputy STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Date: ,19 87 FOB VALUABLE CONSIDEEATI0~, .- a __~_~nicipal corporation Minnesota (reserved for recording data) the City of Mound, Minnesotat x~ex , Grantor, hereby conveys and qui~Aaims to under the hws o! , Grsntee (s), re~pwperty~ Hennepin. Coun~,Minnew~,der~ibed ufo~ows: Lots 13, 14, and 15, except the northerly 44 feet of said Lots, Block 33, Wychwood, according to the plak thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County, retaining to the City of Mound a street and utility easement over the South 5 feet of the aforedescribed premises and a utility easement over the North 31 feet of_~he South 36 feet of the aforedescribed premises, to~ether with all hereditamentm and appurtenances belon~n~ thereto. Ci:v of Mound. Minnesota Affix D~ed Tax Stamp Here ,. By STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF FENNEPIN M. Th'e ~re~oin~w~ acknowledged ~fore me this by . ~t~v~n ~mlth ~e ~ayor I~ Mawor By , I~ Cit? Manager d~y of , ,19 .... and F~dwmrd J. .~h~,~l. , and City Maria ~er , on beh~f of ~e corporation · of the City under the law~ of SEA~, (o]~ o~zx TFF'-E oa ]~m(K) J ~C)?AJ~IAL S?AMP I ~i~NST~u~E~-~A~'DRAFTEDBY~AM~ANDADD~$~] Curtis A. Pearson ll00.Firs= Bank Place West Minneapolis, MN 55402 SIGNATUItE OF PEK~ON TAI~NO ACKNOWI,KDGM~NT Tax ;t~temeat~ fo; t~e ;e.t ~ropert~ de, eMbed b~ t~t' IMt~un~t tbo~l~ be aent t~ (lncJ~6o name end addreel of Orintee)~ o June 18, 1987 City of Mound 5341'Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Attention: Fran Clark Fran. This letter is to confirm.our telephone conversation of June 18, 1987 in which we discussed the purchase of an additional thirty- one (31) feet of lot thirteen (13), fourteen (14) & fifteen (15) in Block 33 of Wychwood for the sum total of One-Hundred dollars ($100.00) plus some miscellaneous expenses. As I mentioned in a previous con'versation, we presently own'the Northerly forty-four feet of these lots. We Sincerely appreciate your assistance concerning this purchase. Thank you. Gregory L. and Karen K. Sycks 4983 Leslie Road Mound, Minnesota 5536'4 (612) 472-3016 BLV D '~ .. _.~,. · RD PROPERTY LOCATION:' Across Hanchester Rd. from 3001 Brighton Blvd, 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 June 29, 1987 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROH: CiTY CLERK RE: TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY Lots 25 and 26, Block 5, Arden, are tax forfeit lots that were conveyed to the City in the 1970's. These were kept for street purposes for when Tuxedo Blvd. was realigned. That realignment projeot is completed and'the City does not need parts of these lots. The person who owns · Lots l, 2, 3, and 27, Block 5, Arden, has requested that we release the portions of Lots 25 and 26 that are not' needed for street purposes. He would llke to purchase these two lots and combine them with his property. The Engineer has determined what should be released· The attached resolution does the following: 1. Reconveys the portion that can be released (is not needed by the City). 2. Releases that portion for sale to adjoining property owners to be combined'with their property. fc RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION-RECONVEYING (IF NECESSARY) CERTAIN TA~ FORFEIT LANDS BACK TO THE STATE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS ~ND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF ADJOINING LANDS WHEREAS, the City of Mound has been informed by the Department of Property Taxation of Hennepin County that certain lands within the City have.been forfeited for non-payment of real. estate taxes; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has a number of tax parcels which do not comply with the City's zoning ordinance and building codes because of a lack of minimum area, shape, frontage, access prob- lems, or the parcels contain nuisances or dangerous conditions which are ad~.erse to the health, safety and general welfare of residents of this City; and WHEREAS, the City was instrumental in obtaining legislation which would allow said parcels to be withheld from public-sale and sold at a non-public sale to eliminate nuisances and dangerous conditions and to increase compliance with land use ordinances and Minnesota Laws of .1982, Chapter 523, Article 39, Sect. 6 was adopted to provide said authority to the City and the County; and WHEREAS, a specific list of tax forfeited lands has been provided the City and the City wishes to restrict and condition t'he sale of certain lands 'to bring them into conformance with City ordinances and land use goals; and WHEREAS, all special assessments were cancelled at the time of forfeiture and may be reassessed after the property is returned to private ownership pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282.02 (also note: M.S. 429.07, Subd. 4; M.S. ~35..23 and M.S. ~.076); and WHEREAS, all special assessments that have been levied since forfeiture shall be included as a separate item and added to the -appraised value of any such parcel of land at the time it is sold (M.S. 282.01, Subd. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of th'e City of Mound, Minnesota: The County Board is hereby requested to impose condi- tions on the sale of the following described lands, and is further requested to sell such lands only to owners of lands adjoining at a non-public sale so that said lands will be combined for tax and land use purposes and will comply with City ordinances and regulations: PARCEL PID ~2~-11.7-2~ ~ 0057- Described as loll ows: That part of Lot' 25, Block 5, ARDEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of a line 30.0 feet northerly of and parallel with the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 2~; Township l lT, Range 2~; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 2~ a distance of 270.86 feet; thence East 100.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence northeasterly ~85.00 feet along a tangential curve concave to the · northwest, having a radius of 286.~8 feet and a central' angle of 37 degrees, and there terminating. REASON FOR AND CONDITIONS TO BE IMPOSED Undersized lot to be sold only to and combined with ad- joining properties SPECIALS LEVIED BEFORE FORFEITURE LEVY ~ AMOUNT SPECIALS LEVIED SINCE FORFEITURE LEVY ~ 'AMOUN' NONE NONE Be PARCEL PID '#2~-117-2q ~ 0058 - Described as follows: That part of Lot 26, Block 5, ARDEN, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of a line 30.0 feet northerly of and parallel with the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 24, Township ~l?, Range 2~; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 24 a distance of 270.86 feet; thence East ~00.00 feet to the point of beginning; thence northeasterly ~85.00 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 286.~8 feet and a central angle of 37 degrees, and there terminating. REASON FOR AND CONDITIONS TO BE IMPOSED SPECIALS LEVIED BEFORE FORFEITURE ~EVY # AMOUNT SPECIALS LEVIED SINCE FORFEITURE LE~' ~ AMOUNT Undersized lot to be NONE NONE sold only to and combined with ad- joining properties The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and' directed to release the aforementioned lands for sale, subject to the County imposing the aforestated condi- tions and the lien of special assessments on said lands· The City.of Mound is releasing the~above properties subject to street and utility easements being retained by the City of Mound. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk I N 75 YEARS June 29, 1987 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROH': cITY CLERK RE: TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY Lot 16, Block 9, Whipple is a tax forfeit parcel of land. Part of this lot is in the wetlands. A smaller part is not in the wetlands. but-is also not a buildable lot (too little square footage left and .not enough frontage on a public right-Of-way).. The a.ttached resolution does the following: 1. Reconveys the~portion that is not in the wetlands back to be sold only .to and combined with adjoining property. Certifies the special assessments that were against the property before forfeiture. (This insures that the City will get 80~ of whatever the lot sells for to be applied against these assessments.) Requests conveyance of the portion of the lot in the wetlands to the City of Hound. The Engineer has determined what should be released. fc RESOLUTION.NO. RESOLUTION RECONVEYING (IF NECESSARY) CERTAIN TA~ FORFEIT LANDS BACK TO THE STATE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD TO IHPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF ADJOINING LANDS; AND AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR CONVEYANCE FROM THE STATE OF CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS WHEREAS, the City of Mound has been informed by Department of Property Taxation of Hennepin County that certain lands .within the City have been forfeited for non-payment of real estate taxes; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has a number of 9ax parcels which do not comply with the City's zoning ordinance"and building codes because of a lack of minimum area, shapg, frontage, access prob- lems, or the parcels' contain nuisancei or dangerous conditions which are adverse to the health, safety and general, welfare of residents of this City; and WHEREAS, the City was instrumental in obtaining legislation which would allow said parcels to be withheld from public-sale and sold at~ a non-public sale to eliminate nuisances, and dangerous conditions and to increase compliance with land use ordinances and Minnesota Laws of 1982, Chapter 523, Article 39, Sect. 6 was adopted to provide said authority to-the City and the County; and WHEREAS, a specific list of tax fOrfeited lands has been provided the City and the City wishes to restrict and condition the sale of certain lands to bring them into conformance with City ordinances and land use goals; and WHEREAS, PID #24-117-24 43 0050, Lot 16, Block 9, Whlpple~ went tax forfeit on May 21, 1986; and WHEREAS, all special assessments were cancelled at the time of'forfeiture and may be reassessed after the property is returned to private ownership pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282.02 (also note: M.S. 429,07, Subd. 4; M.S. 435.23 and M.S. 444.076); and WHEREAS, all special assessments that have been levied since forfeiture shall be included as a separate item and added to the appraised value of any such parcel of land at the time it is sold' (M.S. 282.01, Subd. B). NOW, THEREFORE' BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mo0nd, Minnesota: The County Board is hereby requested to impose condi- tions on the sale of the following described lands, and is further requested to sell such lands only to owners of lands adjoining at a non-public sale so that said lands will be combined for tax and land use purposes and will comply with City ordinances and regulations: "That part of Lot 16, Block 9, WHIPPLE, accordi-ng to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying northerly of a line drawn from a point on the east line of said Lot 16, distant 110 feet south of the northeast corner of said Lot 16, to a point on the west line of said Lot 16, distant 95 feet south of the northwest corner of said Lot 16." REASON FOR AND CONDITIONS TO BE IMPOSED SPECIALS LEVIED BEFORE FORFEITURE LEVY ~ AMOUNT SPECIALS LEVIED SINCE FORFEITURE LEVY ~ AMOUNT Undersized lot to be sold only to and combined with-ad- joining properties 3180 $ 292.00 3388 $ z~16.7Zl 3397 $ 2~1.72 '8298 $ 2,876.02 9~19 $ 195.00 NONE The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to release the aforementioned lands for sale, subject to the County imposing the aforestated conditions and the lien of special assessments on said lands. The City of Mound is releasing the above properties subject to street and utility easements being retained by the City of Mound. Hereby authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to make application to the State of Minnesota for conveyance of the following described property for a public purpose (wetlands): "That part of Lot 16, Block 9, WHIPPLE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southerly of a line drawn from a point on the east line of said Lot 16, distant 110 feet south of the northeast corner of said Lot 16, to a point on the west line of said Lot 16, distant 95 feet south of the northwest corner of said Lot 16." The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councllmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk '\ ~ APPLICATZON ~¥.GOVER~MF. NT. AL ST.~DZ'VLS~.O~.'~ L"O,R, TAX-FORFEITED LANDS ~. ~ ~) ~eso]utlon (Copy attached hereto) H6nnep1n That part.of Lot 1.6, Biock.,q, VHIPPLE,.accordlng to'the:r6corded, plat thereof, Hennepin .County,.Hinnesota ly.l.ng southerly of a lir~ drawn from · ~oint' on the east line of Said Lot 16, distant 110 feet south'o.f the northeast corner of said Lot 16, to a .point' on the west 1'ina of said Lot .16~. distant. 95 fe~t south of the northwest corner of said Lot ~6. . ~. Ph~taf~m~aara {'el * wetlands that adjoin thls portion of thls lot; ~. . (PR~.b'PPZ~cant ~2~,~L. ret ~ o~n ~a~ Z~ ~or ~ ~o~w~ P~: (~), we t 1 and ~ O~nmj of ' Hennep. l n.f~a' CITY OF HOUND .T~ .... ' ,C.IT~, CLERK "I ~,,nd:~__C,t ty Clerk I . O~e ..... .C...!.t_y., of Hound ........ - ............. '..o7 I · ' t,h~t tT~y ~k,~ve r~ t~/ore~oL~ appZ~at~ an~ k tro~ the ~t~ts t~r~f; ~ ~ the ~t~r~ ~ t~xdn are ~ . .. Sub~rlbe~ an~ rwor~ to be/ore rn~ thi~ o~ay of , I9 ...... I~ I · LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Across '~uxedo Blvd. from 5134 Tuxedo Blvd. [~l :O~ I/. I I~;F" :.~ RD _,1 RD RD L.~. L.~-I.-= J I 0lq) RD ~ 10';9 ~ £DO 0 Iai. 4¸3 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 June 29, 1987 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM:- CITY CLERK RE: TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY The attached resolution deals with two parcels of property that went tax forfeit. These two parcels both contain land that should be a part of the wetlands. They both abut wetlands. They also contain enoughlland out of the wetlands to be conforming with the R-1 zoning (10,O00 square feet). The 'City does need an easement over one of the parcels for drainage (storm sewer). The attached resolution does the following: 1. Requests conveyance of the portions of the lots in the wetlands to the City of Mound. 2. Releases the remainder of the lots for public auction. Certifies the special assessments that were against the property .before forfeiture. .'4. Requests that a utility easement be put on the one lot for storm sewer. The Engineer has determined what should be released and what should be retained by the City. ~. fc July 1~, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION REQUESTING CONVEIANCE OF PORTIONS OF TAX FORFEIT LANDS; RELEASING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF TAX FORFEIT LANDS TO HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PUBLIC AUCTION; CERTIFYING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS; AND REGUESTING AN EASEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Mound has been informed by the Department of Property Taxation of Nennepin County that certain lands within the City have been forfeited for non-payment of real estate:taxes; and WHEREAS, the parcels do comply with the City's zoning ordinance or building codes and are not adverse to the health, safety and general welfare of residents of this City except that certain portions need to be retained by the City-for wetlands; and WHEREAS, all special assessments were cancelled at the time of forfeiture and may be reassessed after the property is returned to private ownership pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282,02 (also note: M.S. ~29.07, Subd. ~; M.S. ~B5.23 and M.S. ~.076).; and WHEREAS, all special assessments that have been levied since forfeiture shall be included as a separate item and added to the appraised value of any such parcel of land at the time it is sold (M.S.. 282.01, Subd. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: That the following portions of tax forfeited land are released to the County of Hennepin for public auction and the City hereby certifies the following special assessments: A® PORTION TO BE RELEASED: 0005 (PART OF PID ~23-117-2~I 31 That part of the following described property: Lot 33; That part of Lot 32 lying northerly of a line drawn from a point on the east line of said Lot distant ~0 feet north of the Southeast corner of said Lot to a point on the west line of said Lot distant ~0 feet northerly of the Southwest corner of said Lot. That part of Lot 3~ lying southerly of a line drawn westerly from a point on the east line of said Lot distant 27.5 feet northerly of the July 14, 1987 Southeast corner of said Lot and passing through northerly of the Southeast corner of said Lot and passing through a point in the west line of said Lot distant 30.00 feet northerly of the Southwest corner of said Lot all in Block 1, The Highlands. Which lies westerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the south line of the above described property, distant 100.00 feet east of the southwest corner of said above described property; thence northeasterly to a point on the north line of said above described property, distant 115.00 feet east of the northwest corner of said above described property. ~.~ AMOUNT BEFORE .AMOUNT AFTER FORFEITURE FORFEITURE LEVY # AMOUNT L~VY ~ AMOUNT 3180 $ 511.00 3388 $ 823.38 5803 $ 133 8297 $ 5,095.111. NONE PORTION TO BE RELEASED: 0006) (PART OF PID #23-117-24 31 That part of the following.deScribed property: That part of Lot 34 lying northerly of a line drawn from a point on the east line of said Lot 3~ distant 27.5.feet north of the Southeast corner of said Lot 3q to a point on the west line of said Lot 34 distant 30 feet northerly of the Southwest corner of said Lot. Also all of Lot 35 and that part of Lot 36 lying southerly of a line drawn westerly from .a point on the east line of said Lot 36 distant 12.5 feet northerly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 36 and passing.through a point on the west line of said Lot 36 distant 25 feet northerly of the Southwest corner of said Lot 36, all in Block 1, The Highlands. Which lies westerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the south line of the above described property, distant 115.00 feet east of the southwest corner of said above described property; thence northeasterly to a uly 14, 19.87 point on the north line of said 'above described prope.rty, distant 155.00 feet east of the northwest corner of said above described property. AMOUNT BEFORE FORFEITURE LEV~ ~ AMOUNT AHOUNT AFTER FORFEITURE LEV~ · AMOUN~ 3180 $ 511.00 3388 $ 929.61 5803 $ 133.42 8297 $ 4,821.10 NONE That the Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized to make application to the State of Minnesota for conveyance of the following described property for a public purpose (wetlands): APPLICATION FOR CONVEYANCE OF A PORTION OF PID t23- 117-24 31 0005 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: That part of the following described property: Lot 33; That par. t of Lot 32 lying northerly of .a line drawn from a point on the east line of said Lot distant 40 feet north of the Southeast corner of said Lot to a point on the west line of said. Lot distant 40 feet northerly of the Southwest corner of said Lot. That part of Lot 34 lying southerly of a line drawn westerly from a point on the east line of said Lot distant 27.5 feet northerly of the Southeast corner of said Lot and passing through northerly of the Southeast corner of said Lot and passing through a point in the west line of said Lot distant 30.00 feet northerly of the Southwest corner of said Lot all in Block 1, The Highlands. Which lies easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the south line of'the above described property, distant 100.00 feet east of the southwest corner of said above described property; thence northeasterly to a point on the north line of said above described property, distant 115.00 feet east of the northwest corner of said above described property. July 14, 1987 APPLICATION FOR cONVEYANCE OF A PORTION OF PID 823- 117-2q 31 0006 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: That part of the following described property: That part of Lot 34 lying northerly of a line drawn from a point on the east line of said Lot 34 distant 27.5 feet north of the Southeast corner of said Lot 34 to a point on the west line of said Lot 34 distant 30 feet northerly of' the Southwest corner of said Lot. Also all of Lot 35 and that part of Lot 36 lying southerly of a line drawn westerly from a point on the east line of said Lot 36 distant 12.5 feet northerly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 36 · and passing through a point ~ the west line .of said Lot 36 distant 25 feet northerly of the Southwest corner of sa~ Lot 36, all in Block 1, The Highlands. Which lies easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the south line of the above described Property, distant 115.00 feet east of. the southwest corner of said above described property; thence northeasterly to a point on the north line of said above described property, distant 155.00 feet east of the northwest corner of said above described property. The Mayor and ~he City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to release the aforementioned lands for sale at public auction subject to the County imposing the lien of special assessments on said lands. The City of Mound is releasing the above properties subject to street and utility easements being retained by · the City of Mound and the following drainage and utility easement be put on that portion of PID #23-117-24 31 0005 that is beeing releassed for public auction: A perpetual easement for utility purposes over, under and across the following described property: Lot 33; That part of Lot 32 lying northerly of a line from a point on the east line of said Lot distant 40 feet north of the Southeast corner of said 'Lot to a point on the west line of said Lot distant 40 feet northerly of the Southwest corner of said Lot: That part of Lot 34 lying southlery of a line drawn westerly from a point on the east line of July 1~, lg87 said Lot distant 27.5 feet northerly of the Southeast corner of said Lot and passing through a point on the west line of said Lot distant 30.00 feet northerly of the Southwest corner of said Lot, all in Block 1, The Highlands. Said perpetual easement being the north 10.00 feet of said Lot 32. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember · ' The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councllmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk APPLICATION BY' GOVERNMENTAL SUBDIVISION, FOR, CONVEYANCE OF · TAX-FOIl"CITED LANDS ~ uowrn,~rrta~ SuMJ, v~sLor~ ~o~ ~ Co~w~a~o~ of C~rta~ Cop~s.mno.., CITY OF MOUND " ~. ~ ~) .... Resolution " (Copy attached hereto) ~~for/~~~foZ~wa:_The~ oart of the fo]towin9 described Orop~'rty: . . .-'. ' ~o: ~3; ~hat part of Lot ~2.iylng northerly of a line drawn rrm a point on ~he east 'li6e Of · sa;d Lot dista.nt '~0 f. eet north of the SoUtheast'corner o( said for to p poin~ on the west 'of .said. Lot distant ~O'feet .~o~thec~.y.of the Southwest c6'~ner'of kO.id .Lo~.' " · ~. ' 3 .' '.T. hat·part of Eot ~']ying s~utherly .of a'.]ine drawn·weSterly ff~ e'~oint'on"the e~st 'l[~e of said. Lot distant'27.5, feet 'ahd n6r'therly o~ '[he. Southeas't corner of. said Lot'and passing · ErougH northerly' of the $outheas[ Corner:of. said Lot and ~as~'ing t~r~ugh~'a poin~ .on the':': west· line of. said Lot distant .jO',00 '~eet northerly 6f 'the'SouthWest 'corner 6f'~ald 'k~t' al~ ' ' % Beg i hnj ng 'a: a p~i nt on the 'south' ] i ne~ of .fha ~bove d~scribed., pr0p~dZ~,' .d i S~ht 10°:.60 fa'et ' east of the sou.:hwest corner ~f ;said above'descr]b~ pcoper~y; .t~nce northea~:e~ly to a " ~.~ · point 6n the nof[h l l.h~ of ~a'id above deserlbe~:proper~yt dls~% 115.00 feet '~a'~'t o~ ~he nort~e~t corner..of said above descr~bed'pFoperty.' PORTION OF-:PID ~2~-11'7~2~'3t 0005'' -.'" ~' ~$~~(0): single family resldenthal ' · · · · ..; CITY OF HOUND : .. . :.. . ... .. ~ Co~.~j o! Henn~p; n '-;3~. - CiTy CLERK $~bscr~be~ anc~ rworz~ to be fora rn~ thb ..... -\ AP..PLICAT1ON BY GOV~NT. AL SUBDIVISION FOR, CONVEYANC~ OF TAX.FORFErrED LA.ND$ Co~ ~ow CI:"Y 0F MOUND ~. ~ ~) Resolution .... (COpym at,~ached hereto) · m ~~r[~~.~[o~,: ,That, part ~f the fotl~ing ~esc'~ibed pro~erty: . ..', ' That part of Lot ~k lying northerly ot' a. line.arawn.rr~ a Poi. n[ on' t'~e' east line.of ~a)d . Lot ~ di'stant 27.5 feet botch of the Southeast 'corner of Said Lot )q to a point 'on :thq west ." 'line of said LOt· 3~ distant ~O'feet,northerly of the Soul'est co~neK of.'s~id'Lot... Al~o all" .'.~f Ldt ~5 and that'part of ~t ~6 lylhg Southerly* of.al'[ne drawh.~esterly fr~ a point on the ~as'c. llne'of sald.~Lot ~'6.'distah~ ]2.5 .fe~t' northerly of the Soucheas't'corne~ of.said ,. C~ ~6 ~nd.'passifio.through a polnt, o~ the west ilne of. said' L6~ ~6 distant' 25:.fee't. no. rtheCly. of the SouthweSt corner' of s~id Lot '~6, al,1 .in Bloc~. 1', 'T~e Hlghlands.' ,.: . .. -north~t ~orn~r"of s~l~ ~'d~erlbed'~o~r~.~ ..... ' .. ". :. · : . '- . ..r . · '. .- :. '. ~ · ... ~ ~~(o) single family.residential . '" '' ' . - C l~ OF MOUND " ~ . ' L" · '' -'. ~ " .. '' · 'I~ , '' · . . :. . : ·It~ C l~ CLERK. ~a~g.--. City Clerk .......... ~,.o/t;~ ......... ~]~_y~f gound A[~ ~m.m~slo~ HAZELWOOD LA OAKL~ %' '~ LA.;#~, LA' HOLT LA --'i O)~' 'Z July 1~, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION RECONVEYING CERTAIN PORTION OF TAX FORFEIT LANDS BACK TO THE STATE; REQUESTING THESE LANDS BE COHBINED; REQUESTING THE COUNT! BOARD TO IHPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRTCT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF ADJOINING LANDS WHEREAS, the City of Mound requested conveyance, to the City, of certain tax forfeit lands in ARDEN, for park purposes;. and .. WHEREAS, the property description for this property is as follows: Lots 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 & 23, Block 1, Arden, PID ~24-117-24 ~4 0195; and WHEREAS, 'this land was conveyed to 'the City in State Deed #150288 on January 23, 1976; and WHEREAS, the City does not need a portion of this property for park purposes; and . WHEREAS, the property owner of Lot~16, Block 1; Arden, has'a nonconforming lot in' size and frontage to a public right- of-way and would like to obtain enough to make his lot conforming to the City's Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City has now determined how much of Lots 17, 18 & 19, Block 1, Arden, would be necessary to allow conformance for Lot lB and would be described as follows: "That part of Lots 17, 18 and 19, Block 1, "ARDEN", according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the south line of. said Lot 17 · . distant 31.70 feet westerly of the southeast corner, of said Lot 17; thence northerly to the northeast corner of said Lot 19 and said line there terminating." WHEREAS, the above described parcel does not comply with the .City's zoning ordinance and building codes because of a lack of minimum .area, shape, frontage, access problems, or the parcels contain nuisances or dangerous conditions which are adverse to the health, safety and general welfare of residents of this City; and' , WHEREAS, the City was instrumental in obtaining legislation which would allow said parcels to be withheld from public-sale and sold at a non-public sale to eliminate nuisances and dangerous conditions and to increase compliance with land use ordinances and Minnesota Laws of 1982, Chapter 523, Article 39, July 14, 1987 Sect. 6 was adopted to provide said authority to the City and the County; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to restrict and condition the sale of certain lands to bring this parcel into conformance with City ordinances and land use goals; and WHEREAS, all special assessments were cancelled at the time of forfeiture and may be reassessed after the property is returned to private ownership pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282.02 (also note: M.S. ~29.07, Subd. 4; M.S. ~B5.23 and M.S. ~.076); and WHEREAS, all special assessments that have been levied since forfeiture shall be included as a separate item and added to the appraised value of any such parcel of land. at the time it is sold (M.S. 282.01; Subd. 3). NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. ~y the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: The County Board is hereby requested to impose - .conditions on the sale of the following-described lands, and is further requested to sell such lands only to .owners of lands adjoining at a non-public sale so that said lands will be combined 'for tax and land use purposes and will comply with City ordinances and regulations: A portion of PID ~2~-117-2~ ~.0195, described as: "That part of Lots 17, 18, and 19, Block 1, "ARDEN", according to the recorded plat thereof, HennePin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described line: PARCEL (PID) Beginning at a point on the south line of said Lot 17 distant 31.70 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said Lot 17; thence northerly to the northeast corner of said Lot 19 and said line there terminating." REASON FOR AND CONDITIONS TO BE IMPOSED SPECIALS LEVIED BEFORE FORFEITURE LEVY~ AMOUNT SPECIALS LEVIED SINCE. FORFEITURE LEW AMOUN3 Described above. Undersized lot to be sold only to and combined with ad- joining properties NONE NONE July lq, 1987 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to release the aforementioned lands for sale, subject to the County imposing the aforestated condi- tions and the lien of special assessments on said lands. B. The City of Mound is releasing the above properties subject to street and utility easements being retained by the City of Mound. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk ;HIRE BLVD ~ 311 16 block Is oil marsh 17 'F )N RD*- ':.$1 Thi~ block Is all marsh ! 2::,' ;, CUMBERLAND ~ RD il FoR.$1~£E *Co Ro3'olld~aJ4 LOCATION OF PROPERTY; Next to /~856 Donald Drive. e Pla~ o£ Surv~.y for Zubor% Construction ~. o~ lot 16, Rlock %,' Arden P~.nnei~ln Ooun%y, F~nneso~m .?5 '.- Bi,7,.- C~.rtific--te of Survey: %ion o.~ ~ survey of I~ 6ocs no% Furl. or% ~o Scale: 1" ' 4~' Da~e : ~-2Z-72 o : Irpn marker Gorcon R. Coffin - R-g~-,'~'. 6064 L~nd S,m-v.-yor and Plann-r ~n~ Lake, L.:lnn.-so%a RECONYEYANCE OF PORTIONS OF FORFEITED LANDS TO STATE OF MINNESOTA BY GOVERi~T~ SUBDIVISIONS WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, Subdivision '1, the STATE OF MINNESOTA, as trustee under Minnesota Statutes, Section 281.25, on the 23rd daf of January ,19 76 , conveyed to C! t;, ~ ~und (STATE DEED #1 50288) a governmental subdivision, certain lands, of which the lands hereinafter described are a portion, to b~ used for an authorized public use, and WHEREAS, Said governmental subdivision has failed to put the lands hereinafter described to the public use for which it was conveyed and the governing body thereof has authorized the proper officers to convey the same to the State of Minnesota, as such trustee, NOW, TI-LEREFORE, This indenture, made this I/4 ~ h day of July , 198.~7 between c i tv of Mound : , a governmental subdivision of the State of Minnesota, as party of the first part, and the State of l~[innesota, as trustee as hereinafter set - forth, as party of the second part, WITBIESSETH, That the said party of the first part, in consideration of the premises a~d other valuable considerations, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby Grant, Bar- gain, quitclaim and Reconvey unto the said party of the second part all the tract or parcel of land lying and beinir in the county of H~nnen i n in the State of Minnesota, described as follows, te-wit: That[ part of Lots 17, 18 and 19., Block 1, "ARDEN", according to the recorded plat thereof, 'Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described l~ne: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Lot 17 distant 31.70 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said Lot 17; thence northerly to the northeast corner of saiO LO[ 1~ and sa~o I~ne there terminating. - in trust as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 281.25, upon like conditions lind With like effect as if said lands had not been conveyed to said party of the first part as aforesaid. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, Together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonh, ing or in anywise appertaining, to the said party of the second part and its successors and assigns, Forever. IH TESTIMON'Y WHEREOF, Said party of the first part has caused these presents to be executed in its corporate name by its Mavor and its r i ti' r I erl~ and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed the day and year first above written. In Presence of: CITY OF MOUND l~me of Governmental Subdivision Its Mayor Its City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ~,.nn,.pln SS. On this day of ,19 , before me, s Nn~¥ P,,hl ~ ~ithin and for said county, personally appeared and to me personally known, who, beinl~ each by me duly sworn say that they are respectively the Mayor ~nd tb~ City Clerk of the governmental subdivision named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said governmental subdivision; and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said governmental subdivision by authority of i,-, Clty Council ~nd said Mayor and ~ily ~lerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said governmental subdivision. APPROVAL The undersigned, acting for the Commissioner of Taxation of the State of Minnesota, under delegation of authority duly filed with the Secretary of State, does hereby approve the foregoing conveyance to the State of Minnesota. Dated: In the Presence of: STATE OF MINNESOTA Commissioner of Tlxmtion By 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 June 29, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK ~TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY The attached resolution deals with two tax forfeit lots that are conforming in square footage (10,000), have enough front footage and are not in the wetlands. The resolution does the f~llowing: 1. Release both parcels for public auction. 2. Certifies the special assessments that were against the property before forfeiture. fc RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION RELEASING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS TO HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PUBLIC AUCTION AND CERTIFYING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Mound has been informed by the Department of Property Taxation of Hennepin County that certain lands within the City have been forfeited for non-payment of real estate taxes; and WHEREAS, the parcels do comply with the City's zoning ordinance or building codes and are not adverse to the health, safety'and general welfare of residents of this City; and WHEREAS, all special assessments were cancelled at the time of forfeiture and may be reassessed af~ter'the property is returned to private ownership pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282.02 (also note: M.S. 429.07, Subdo 4; M.S. 435.23 and M.S. 444.076); and WHEREAS, all special assessments that have been levied since forfeiture shall be included as a separate item and added to the appraised value of any such parcel of land at the time it is sold (M.$. 282.01, Subd. 3); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: That the following parcels of .tax forfeited land are released to the County of Hennepin for public auction and the City hereby certifies the following special assessments: PARCEL PID ~ & DESCI~P. ~23-~17~2q 31 0007 31 80 (Com at NW cor of Lot 37 3388 th Ely to a pt in E line 5803 thof dis 14 ?/10 ft S 8297 from NE cor thor th S AMOUNT BEFORE FORFEITURE LEVY ~ AHOUNT $ 365.00 $ 827.41 $ 88.94 $ 4,439.62 AMOUNT AFTER FORFEITURE LEVY ~ AMOUNT NONE along E line of Lots37 and 36 dist 72 8/10 ft th Wly to a pt in W line of Lot 36 dist 25 ft N from SW ocr thof th Nly to beg, Block 1, The Highlands. #23-117-24 31 0008 3180 (Com at SW cot of Lot 38 3388 th Nly along Wly line 5803 thof 72 ft th E to a pt 8297 in E line of Lot 39 dis $ 365.00 $ 827.41 $ 88.95 $ 3,977.38 NONE 70 ft N from SE cot thor th S to SE eot thor th E to NE eot of Lot 37 th S along E line thor 14 7/10 ft th Wly.to bell, Block 1, The Highlands. The Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to release the aforementioned lands for sale at public auction subject to the County imposing the lien of special assessments on said lands. The City of Mound is releasing the above properties subject to street and utility easements being retained by the City of Mound. The foregoing resolution 'was moved by Councilmember 'and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Counctlmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City. Clerk ',\ HAZELWOOD, LA . =KIPI_ING LA' -r 0 Z HOLT LA mi 75 YEARS June 29, 1987 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: RE: CITY COUNCIL CITY CLERK TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY Lbts 12 & 13, Block 12, Avalon, were taken by the City in June of 1978 for wetlands. They are not entirely in the wetlands. The person who owns Lots 18 & 19 would like to purchase whatever ground is not in the wetlands. The Engineer has determined what portion of the lots is not in the wetlands. These lots are unbuildable as they are. The attached, resolution does the following: 1. Reconveys the portion of Lots 12 & 13 that is not in the wetlands back to the State. 2. Releases that portion for sale to adjoining property owners to be combined with their property. 3, C.ertifies the special assessments that were against the property before forfeiture. fc RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION RECONVEYING (IF NECESSARY) CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS BACK TO THE STATE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF ADJOINING LANDS WHEREAS. the City of Hound has been informed by the Department of Property Taxation of Hennepin County that certain lands within the City have been forfeited for non-payment of real- estate taxes; and WHEREAS, the City of Hound has a number of tax parcels which do not comply with the City's zoning ordinance and building codes because 'of a lack of minimum area, shape, frontage, access prob- lems, or the par.eels contain nuisances or daAgerous conditions which are adverse to the health, safety and general welfare of residents of this City; and WHEREAS, the City was instrumental in obtaining legislation which would allow said parcels to be withheld from public-sale and sold at a non-public sale to eliminate nuisances and dangerous conditions and to increase compliance with land use ordinances and Minnesota Laws of .1982, Chapter 523, Article 39, Sect..-6 was adopted to provide said authority to the City and the County; and WHEREAS, a specific list of tax forfeite~ lands has been provided the City and the City wishes to restrict and condition the sale of certain lands to bring them into conformance with City ordinances and land use goals; and WHEREAS, all special assessments were cancelled at the time of forfeiture and may be reassessed after the property is returned to private ownership pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282.02 (also note: M.S. 429.07, Subd. 4; M.S. 435,23 and M.S. 444.076); and WHEREAS, all special assessments that have been levied since forfeiture shall be included as a separate item and added to the appraised value of any such parcel of land at the time it is sold (M.S. 282.01, Subd. 3). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: The County Board is hereby requested to impose condi- tions on the sale of the following described lands, and is further'requested to sell such lands only to owners of lands adjoining at a non-public sale so that said lands will be combined for tax and land use purposes and will cOmply with City ordinances and regulations: REASON FOR AND CONDITIONS TO BE IMPOSED SPECIALS LEVIED BEFORE FORFEITURE LEVY # AMOUNT The south 40 feet of Lots 12 and 13, Block 12, AVALON, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepln County, Minnesota. SPECIALS LEVIED SINCE FORFEITURE LEVY ~ AMOUNT Undersized lot to be 3180 $ 292.00 NONE sold only to and combined with ad- joining properties The .M~y~r and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to release the aforementioned lands for sale, subject to the County imposing the aforestated condi- tions and the lien of special assessments on said lands. The City of Mound is releasing the. above properties subject to street and utility easements being retained -by the City of Mound. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The.following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk °e STRATFORD'" CARLOW RD 47,,I lB K£LL$ F sz 31 /i! /~. I \ .\ ~RUNSWICK ~ORCHESTER RD-' RD LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Behind Dorchester Road. ~ 35 3,6 RECONVEYANCE OF PORTIONS OF FORFEITED LA~D$ TO STATE OF M]~.~OTA BY GOVI~.i~IF.~'TAL SUBDIVISIONS WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 28L01, Subdivision li the STATE OF MIArI~ESOTA, as trustee under Minnesota .Statutes, Section 281.25;on th- 2ltd day of .June - ; 19 78 ; conveyed to . C? %' '''~ M~und (State Deed f1288820~ a ~overnmental subdivision, e~in lands, of which the l~ds hereinafter d.~bed .re a porUo~ to used for an authorized public use, and WI~REAS, Said governmental subdivision has failed to put the lands hereinafter described to the public use for which it was conveyed and the governing body thereof has authorized the proper officers to convey the same to the State of Mirmeeota, as such trustee, NOW, THEREFORE° This indenture, mede.~his d~y of 19 , between C i ty °f Mo.nd ; a ~overnmental subdivision of the State of Minnesota, as party o! the first part, and the State o! Dlinnesota, as trustee as herek~ter set forth, as part7 of the second part, W1T17EBSRTH, That the said part7 of the first part, tn consideration of the premises and other valuable consideratiuns, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby Great, gain, iluitelaim and Reconvey unto the said party of the second part all the tract or parcel of land lyin~ ~ld boin~ ill the ~ounty of Heflneo; n ~ the St~ta of M'~'~_esot&, deeeffbed as :[ollow~, to-wit: in trust as provided By l~fi~-esota Statutes, Section 281.25, upon like conditioni and with like effect as if said lands had.not been conveyed to said party of the first part as aforesaid. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE ~AIv~., Together ~ith ail the heredttamente and appurtenances thereunto belongi~ or in anywise appertaining, to the said party of the second part and its successors and assiims, Forever. IN TESTI~O~ WHEREOF, Said party of the first part has caused these presents to be executed in its corporate name by its ~ie Yo r and itc r i ty ~' 1 e r~r '" and its corporate eeal to be hereunto at,xed the day and year first above written. la Presence of: CITY OF MOUND Nme ~! Gover-,me~tsl S~bdlvisio= Its Mayor Its City clerk STATE OF M/NNESOTA COUNTY OF H~nn~.nln ss. On this day.of ,19 , before me, s N~t--¥ p,,~l ;e within and for said county, personally appeared and , to me personally known, who, being: each by me duly sworn say that they are respectively tile Maynr ~-d th~ Clty Clerk of the governmental subdivision named in the foregoing instrument, and that.the seal affaxed ~ said instrument is the corporate seal of said governmental subdiv.i~.i.on,, and th.a.t s.a.ta instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said governmental subchvm~on by au:nori~r oflt~ Cltv Council --d sal~ Mayo~ an~ [:lt.v Clerk acknowledged said [a~trument to be the free act and deed of said governmental subcLtvision. APPROVAL The undersigned, acting for the Commissioner of Taxation of the State o! Minnesota, u~der delegatlon of authority duly filed with the Secretary of State~ does hereby approve the foregoing conveyance to the State of ~inne$ota. Dated: In the Presence of: STATE OF MINNESOTA Commi~iom~ e~ Te~.atimt By July 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION REVISING THE 1987 BUDGET ADOPTED IN RESOLUTIONS 86-133 AND 86-134 WHEREAS, the 1987 Budgets for the General Fund and all Enterprise Funds were adopted in Resolutions ~86-133 and #86-134 on October 1, 1986; and WHEREAS, the 1987 Budget reflected salaries at 1986 levels pending Union Contract negotiations and administrative salarx, settlements; and WHEREAS, all Union Contracts have been adopted and all administrative salaries have been established for 1987. NOW,-THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Councll of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby adopts the following revised 1987 General Fund and Enterprise Funds as follows: · GENERAL FUND City Manager/Clerk Finance Police Planning Street~ Shops & Stores Parks Other Departments (non-salaried) Contingency TOTAL GENERAL FUND LIQUOR FUND REVISED 1987 BUDGET ORIGINAL 1987 BUDGET 111,430 103,800 13~,010 128,880 626,130 610,850 104,600 102,120 390,730 385,170 50,810 49,750 14~,760 1~3,920 485,610 485,610 25,640 2,073,720 175,3~0 2,073,720 17~,240 294,140 WATER FUND SEWER FUND 296,910 693,780 688,220 The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: July 14, 1987 The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest.: City Clerk LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 July 8, 1987 TO: Ed Shukle, City Manager FROM: Len Harrell, Chief of Police ~ SUBJECT: Parking on Gull Lane at Wren Road · I have, again, looked at the area of Gull Lane south of Three Points BouleVard in regards to the parking concerns at the dead-end. The area in question appears to only effect two homes at the end of the block,~and users of the commons area. One of the residents, Mrs. LaPointe, has requested ~that parking be allowed On her side of the street.~ Both sides of the street from Wren Road to the dead-end are currently no-parking. To allow parking on one side of the street does not appear to present any major, problems from .apolice standpoint. A concern is the fact that Gull Lane is no-parking on the west side of the street from.Three Points Boulevard south to Wren Road and it may be more consistent to allow parking on the east side of the street south of Wren Road. The Fire Chief has indicated that eliminati.on of no parking on Gull Lane at Wren Road would cause a serious problem for fire fighting. It would be difficult to get a fire truck through the street. This would cert- ainly support retaining the current resolution. -Ed Shukle June 19, 1987 Ed Shukle, Jr. City Manager 5341 Maywoo~ Rd. Mound, Mn. 55364 Dear Mr. Shukle, We are writi~ to ask you to ask the city council to change the ordinance with respect to parking on our dead-end street. Specifically, we would appreciate having the no-parking restriction removed for the west side of Gull Lane, from Wren Road south to the commons. This would not be an inconvenience to anyone, but the no-parking restriction, if enforced, would be a great inconvenience both to us, and to people wishing to use the commons. Thank You, ~ m · Mitch LaPolnte 17SS Gull Lane 472-6122 16 ~aouary 13, lg87 RESOLUTION NO. 87-1~ RESOLUTION DESIGNATING NO PARKING ZONES WHEREAS, Chapter VII.of the Mound Code provides that the City~ Council may from time to time, by resolution, establish rules and~ .- regulations relating to the use of streets within the City, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Councilof the City of Mound, as follows: The following streets in the City of Mound, Minnesota are hereby designated as no parking, no stopping and no standing zones: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Both sides of Edgewater Drive from Fairview Lane to Northern Road. East side of Basswood Lane from Church Road to Tonkawood Road. Both sides of Belmont Lane from Shoreline Boulevar4 to Tonkawood Road. East side of Waterside Lane for 100' north of Tonkawood Road. North side of County Road %15 200' east of County Road %110. Directly in front of post office for purpose of mail drop. North side of County Road #15 by Tonka, Inc. from Fairview Lane to Cypress Lane. Both sides of County Road %15 (Lynwood Boulevard) on the $ curve west of the senior high school. East side of Bellaire Lane from Elm Road to Alder Road. South side of Three Points Boulevard from Finch Lane to Heron Lane. West side of Gull Lane South of Three Points Boulevard for 150'. West side of Wilshire Boulevard (County Road %125) north of Wychwood Bridge to Emerald Drive. North side of Wilshire Boulevard (County Road %125).south of Wychwood Bridge for 600'. West side of Wilshire Boulevard (County R~ad %125) south of Black Lake Channel for 1,450 feet. East side of Wilshire Boulevard (County Road %125) south of Black Lake Channel for 200·feet; parking permitted for 300 feet, and then no parking to Tuxedo. No parking on both sides of Tuxedo Boulevard from Wilshire Boulevard (County Road No. 125) to St. Mary's Road. No parking on both sides of Tuxedo Boulevard from Wilshire Boulevard (County Road No. 125) to St. Ma~y's Road. Both sides of Piper Road in front of Chester Park Beach for 200'. Both sides of Piper Road from Tuxedo Road to Charles Lane. Both sides of Charles Lane. Both sides of Franklin Lane. South side of Leslie Road from Brighton Boulevard tv Manchester Road. 17 January 13, 1~87 22~ 23. 24. 2.5. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. South side of Clyde Road from Tuxedo Boulevard to Island. view Drive. Both sides of Island View Drive from Clyde Road to Dexter Lane. Both sides of Island View Drive from Radnor Road to Manchester Road. Both sides of Highland Boulevard from Bartlett Boulevard (County Road 110) to Idlewood Road. Both sides of Meadow Lane. North Side of Glenwood Road. Both sides of Holt Lane. Both sides of Fairfield Road from Highland Boulevard to Meadow Lane. North side of Bartlett Boulevard (County Road %110) from the Museum to Commerce Boulevard. In front of Mound Taxi on Shoreline Boulevard (County Road %15.) West side of Marion Lane from Shoreline Boulevard (County Road %15) to Auditors Road. 'Shoreline Boulevard from Belmont Lane to Commerce Boulevard. Commerce Boulevard from Lynwood Boulevard south to the Sears Parking Lot. Marion Lane and Auditors Road from Belmont Lane to Marion Lane and no parking on the south side of Auditors Road from Marion Lane to Commerce Boulevard. The south side of Drury Lane from Tuxedo Boulevard and Burns Road. Both sides of Northern Lane from Edgewatez Drive to the. Seton Channel. The east side of Devon Lane from Island View Drive to Lake Minnetonka. South side of the alley' extending eastward from the intersection of Lynwood and Cottonwood Lane along the south side of the football fieldfrom the east side of Lot 18 to the west side of Lot 30 in Lynwold Park. West side of Waterside Lane from Tonkawood Road to Breezy Road. Both sides of Rosedale Road from Hickor~ Lane to Pecan Lane. Both sides of Aberdeen Road from Devon Lane to Island View Drive. Both sides of Aberdeen Road from Devon Lane to Roxbury Lane. Both sdides of Wilshire Boulevard from Shoreline Boulevard (County Road %15) to a point 50 feet south of Shoreline Boulevard. Both sides of Drury Lane from Gordon Road to Tuxedo Boulevard. West side of Eagle Lane from Three Points Boulevard to West Arm Lake. The West side of Finch Lane from Three Points Boulevard to West Arm Lake. 18 January 13, 1987 48; The West side of Ridgewood Road from Idlewood to Longfellow· 49. The North side of Woodland Road from Gull Lane to Eagle Lane. 50. The East side of Donald Drive from Tuxedo Boulevard to Devon Lane· 51. The South side of Ridgewood Road from Westedge Boulevard to Longfellow Lane· 52. Both sides of Gladstone Lane· 53. The West side of Essex Lane south of Bedford Road· 54. Both sides of Tuxedo Boulevard from Drury Lane to Brighton Boulevard. 55. Both sides of Hi'ckory Lane from Northern Lane northerly to Lake Minnetonka. 56. The South side of Alder Road from Bellaire Lane easterly to Commerce Boulevard. 57. The North side of Alder Road from Bellaire Lane easterly 200 feet· 58. Both sides of Pecan Lane from Edg~water Drive, south to railroad right-of-way· 59. Both sides of Driftwood Lahe from Bartlett Boulevard south to Seton Lake· 60. Both sides of Manchester Road from Devon Lane to Tuxedo Boulevard. 61. Both sides of Bartlett Boulevard (County State Aid Highway 125), from 245 feet East of, to 310 feet West of the Lost Lake Channel of Lake Minnetonka. 62. The East side of Highland Boulevard abutting the publi~ park located east of HJighland Boulevard and just north Idelewood Road ~. The park property located ~n Block 2~ Th~ Hi~hlands~ ~~~2BO~~d..es~of~Gull~Lane from Wren Road .s'~Uth.t0 65. The westerly sides of the following streets: ne Heron Lake from Paradise Lane to Sparrow Road. Gull Lane f~om Enchanted Road. to Wren Road. Finch Lane from Three Points Boulevard to Harrison Bay. Bluebird Lane from Harrison Bay to Jennings Bay. Avocet Lane from Harrison Bay to Jennings Bay. Canary Lane from Harrison Bay to Jennings Bay. Dove Lane from Harrison'Bay to Jennings Bay. Eagle Lane from Three Points Boulevard to Harrison Bay. Langdon Lane from Lynwood Boulevard south to dead end. Waterside Lane from Tonkawood Road to Breezy Road. Fern Lane from Church Road to Tonkawood Road. Cedar Lane from Church Road to Noble Lane. Noble Lane from Tonkawood Road to Lynwood Boulevard. Overland Lane from Noble Lane to Harrison Bay. 'BILLS ....... JULY 14, 1987 Batch 874063 Batch 874064 Computer Run dated 7/8/87 Computer Run dated 7/9/87 144,869.48 ~3,688.14 Total Bills 228,557.62 .,J Z I I IIII II II II II / ~ 0 0000 :~0 O0 ~ ~ I I IIII II II ii II. I Z 0 Z 0 U I Z ZZZZ ~Z ~ 0 0000 0 ~ Z ~ ~ 0000-- ~0 O0 O0 O0 0 O0 O0 O0 0 ILl 0 I Z 0 0 Z W · t"' .'7 0 ,~: I-. (,,J 3:: &J 0000000000000 0000000000 .J ,..J ZZ 3:~" N N ZZZZZ COI-- O0 W 0~. -I m~.l W O.J CI _J_l ,~: Z O< ~ :::3 _1 I-- Z 0 M uJ Z W 0 Z o o ! O~ U~ Z ~J ii/ 0 0 ZZ idb, UJL~ O0 ~-~- O0 000000000 cO a) cD ~ ~o cO ~0 ~0 ~ OJ O,J t'J ,',J OJ OJ td ('U (U 000000 ZZZZZZ 000000 " ZZ~-ZZZ 000000 I ! ! a~ U~ Ih M 0~ ~ ~ 0000 0000 M Z 0 .J m O/ o o Z ~0 O0 O0 O0 O0 Z I'- Ii/ ..J 0 Z 0 C~ o .J I- I.-- Z "~ -J)- I-- Ltl Ld ~=~LU 0 Z · =J Z Z 0 -J z I 0 000000 000000 O0 ZZ O0 ZZ O0 ~=~ ~=.~ 0 Z m o "r' Z 0 0 Z ~.J 0 >- >- ~ 0 "~ ~ m m 0 n~ m n, Z 0 Ld oo oo o~ oo ~ ~ oo oo ~ oo ~ ~ oo oooo o o o oo oooo o ~ o ~,o~ 0~0~0~0'~ 0~ o o i ' ; aoX7' t 0 Z t- Z 0 0 Z Z 0 >- o~ ..r. OW '~._1 o 00000 00000 0 W I=- Z~Z~ZZZZZZZZZZZ~ZZZZZ Z 0 0 7-. 'r' 0 CZ: i-4 4: hl UJ Z ~-~ -J 0 Cm 0 Cd hi W 't' L/'I I~ '1 I 0 X I--F-I--l- W ~J liJ ~J ZZ:ZZ 0000 0 n~ .d 0 0 n L~ 0 o o o o o o (',J ~ o -I,.J ~r,,- I--I- ZZ lOC) hlld I--I- Ci UJbJ Z hi G. X I bJ -I X bJ Z · 0 , .J hi I=- --I bJ 0 Z 0 X Z iii 0 -r ).. I-. 0 I- I,.= 0 0. -r * 0 I 0 W Z 0 000 Ltl ~.1 ~aJ 000 Z n.' n,- n,' 00000 ,Il. ,IF 41. 41. 41. n~ 0 Oo O~ O~ o~o~ ~o~ Z 0 r~ >- I I ocD I I oo O0 Z~ O0 LdLd I-- Z Z 0 Z UJ X ~J Z Ltl Z ooo -J O. 0 I,- 0 I n Z 0 · 0 0 ooo W I- w Z' 0 U Z 0 0 Z Z 0 0 0 Z Iii I-, W Ld Z Z 0 }- 000000000 O0 LdLIJ ZZ O0 I I ZZ O0 D,,. 0,. I I I--I-- W C~ i,-4 <: o o 000000000 iii Z 0 ::~ l # # I. Z B. 0 0 I # o tho ~'Z I. 0 I Iii Z 0 Z 0 ~'~ 0 0 Z LLI · ZZ ...I ,..J NN LULIJ O0 ZZ Z 1=4 .J O. IL) h L3 Z b. Z L3 03 ~' (,.9 Z 0 ti. 0 UJ Z 0 b. 0 h' F- Z 0 UJ W Z 0 hl ZZ ;00 O0 0 }- 0 ,id l~l I I l l~l I I I 0000000~0 ~~00 J!llJ'JlJlJl ZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZ IIIIIIl'll 0 0:0 0 0 0 O0 0 W :m I }- i I I T'TT I I I ,.J .,J ..J 000 Z I ..ltd ..J.J ZZ _i.J O0 O0 O Z 0 Z 0 oo J o Ld I- 0 r~ Z 0 r.,,, r~ Z r~ v- I !1. I : I ~1 I! I 41. 4F 41. 41. ~ ~ ,Iq · I 0 Z 0 hi Z e,,, ~J Z 0 ,,R, oo c, a~ ~0 ~0 o \ TO: City Hanager and Hembers of the City Council FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official SUBJECT: June, 1987 Monthly Report During the month of June, the Inspection Department attended two Planning Com- mission meetings on June 8th and the 22nd, and one City Council meeting on June 23rd. The inspection Department had 22 working days in June. Marge attended one Planning Commission meeting and the Park Commission meeting with one week's vacation during the month. The following inspections were con- ducted during the month of June: * Site inspections 48 Footing inspections 3O Framing inspections 14 Insulation inspections Drywall inspections 11 Final inspections 42 Progress inspections 24 Erosion/Grading House moving inspections ** Heating inspections 6 Plumbing inspections ~22 Fi re sprinkler/suppression Complaints 15 Total 222 The monthly report for May was submitted to the City Manager during the month. Zoning reports were submitted to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commis- sion referred 14 zoning cases to the City Council for action which required 5 public hearings; 8 variances, 2 street vacations, 1 rezoning, I subdivision and 2 conditional use permits. Writing of correspondence, resolutions, and Planning Commission reports were sent out from the Department. Correspondence received during the month were reviewed; recording of inspections were made on a daily log. A substitute inspector was called in for the llth of June. One formal complaint was signed during the month of June as well as 3 citations were issued. Correction orders were given for the vacant building at 5900 Glen- wood Road and 4965 Hampton Road. Bids were obtained for boarding of the struc- ture on Glenwood Road. June 'Monthly Report July 8, 1987 - Page 2 Meetings were held with Paul Meisel, Dick Smith, and Jim Nordby to discuss vari- ous building construction projects. I met with the Fire Department regarding the installation of the gasoline tank for Surfside Marina. June Hyland, Animal Patrol, met wlth me to discuss the complaints received for exterior storage and progress of those complaints as wel'l as.the re-inspection of various sites. The Inspection Department met with Public Works, Engineering, and the City Planner to discuss construction, planning requests, and corrections to various properties. I met with Victor Niska of the School District to.discuss remodeling of the Shirley Hills and Grandview Middle School. -A Budget Meeting was conducted as well as the monthly Staff Meeting during the month of June. Plan review was conducted on. numerous homesand duplexes during the month of June. A contracted Plan Reviewer was hired to do 7 plan rev.iews for single family homes. I attended the North star Chapter meeting of I.C.B.O. in Rochester in conjunction with the League of Minnesota Cities. The subject'covered was the Code changes proposed at the September National meeting, the new Stat~ Legislation pertaining to Building Inspect'ion Departments, new material was presented for water piping. The afternoon'was a comparison with the National Fire Protection Association Life Safety Code lOl.and Uniform Building Code requirements. These two cOdes have the same intent and require some change in wordi'ng to align them together for better enforcement purposes. The normal shopping trips were made during the month of June; gasoline at Super- America, pick up f!lm at Snyders Drug Store, and picking up printed material at SOS Printing. The total number of building permits issued in the month of June was 46 with a'valuation of $768,817. The valuation figures are attached on the Building Activity Report for May and June. In addition, our Department prepared the .monthly calendar of the June City meetings and events. We arranged with the Public Works Department to have a grave site staked out for a burial and also several sites staked out for markers in the Mound Union Cemetery. Marge prepared the Park Commission agenda and wrote the minutes as well as typing some~material for the Parks Department. JB/ms Attachmen~ * Site inspections include the review of the PlanningCommission requests and re- quirements, complaints and follow-up to code compliance such as, no building per- mit, re-check of compliance notice, review status of various sites for the City Prosecutor, pre-construction meetings at the site for building permit applicants or realtors, fire damage and perlodic, commercial inspection Updates. ** The heati.ng inspectiomduring the construction of project are included under the framing and final inspections, of the'building. The heating installations mentioned are'for separate equipment being placed in homes and businesses. Several of the inspections'for framing involved framing and insulation of the same structure. APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT CITY OF MOUND ADDRESS Street Number BUILDING OWNER (if'other than applicant) Name Add ress CONTRACTOR. SIGN LOCATION' LOT Name Address BLOCK' ADD I TI ON ALLOWABLE S!GNAGE WALL AREA ..... BY' EXISTING SIGNAGE' DESCRIBE SIGN (Materials, etc:) HEIGHT OF SIGN SQ. FT. Square Footage -Ft. = TOTAL ZONING DISTRICT . NUMBER OF SIGNS· SQ. FOOTAGE OF SIGNS ILLUMINATED: YES By TYPE OF SIGN: WALL MOUNT LENGTH OF TIME SEASONAL SIGN TO BE ERECTED: FREE STANDING~ PORTABLE OTHER PLEASE DESCRIBE REQUEST AND REASON FOR REQUEST: Is sign for a co.unity organization and does It meet all the standards of Section 55.~87 I'f additional information is attached, please submit 8½" X 11" maximum sized drawings. Applicant's ~gnatbre Date submitted APPROVED: Building Official 168 R 9/85 CASE NO 87-655 CiTY OF HOUND Hound, Hinnesota NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING :ON. THE APPLICATION FOR A REVISION OF CONDI'/IONAL USE PER,tIT TO ALLOW ON SITE OPEN STORAGE AT'5300-53~0'SHORELINE BOULEVARD, PID'NUH~£R.'~13-117-2h 3h 0076 ' NOTICE IS.HEREBY'GIVEN'that'on TUesd~y:~ at the.Hound. Cit¥'.'Hal-.1, 53~l.~q~ood' Road, Hound, Minnesota,. a hearing wlll be .h~ld to consider the .appliCation for a revlsi°n to the Conditional Use~Per~lt to...~a.llow"O~ $1T£ OP£N' STORAG~ 'for $~00-$~0 SHORELINE' BO~[EYARD legally described as follc~s.: BLKS'* S' AND 6 SYLVAH~HEZGHT$ *ADDN TO CREVZERS SLIP~O LOT 36 LAFAYETTE PARK 170 AI;D THAT PA~T OF E ttOUta) Arid LOTS 10 TH~U 15 :[riel L P ·ALSO E ~5 FT OF LOT 36 AUO SLr&O 1/~ OF S~i 1/~ LYZt~ H OF SAID LOT ANOS OF A LZN~ PAR 14:[TH MID ~0 FT SLY FROffi CTR L~IE OF I~q RR R/14 ZN~L AOJ VAC ST EX ST ALSO BLK ][ AP.~Atl/Ltt L~ICOLN ADON TO L~KESZOE PARK EX ST :[t:CL PART OF VAC ST Ara3 LOTS ~::~THRU ~LI~JECT TO ROAD -. P I D # 13-'1.17-2q 3q. 0076 i'All pers~n~ appearing at sa~d hearing ~111 be given ah: opportunity to be heard. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk RD Cl~Y o~ HOUND .Hound,' Hinnesota CASE No. 87-657 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR- · ZONING ORDIN~NCE. AHENDHENT TO.ALLOW RETAIL HAIL ORDER Itl THE 1~-1 CENTRAl. BUSINESS DISTRICT'By'..'.'."' .... {. 23.625.3 OF TilE :CITY coJ:)E) ..... ' TO ~/HOH IT HAY cONCERN: ".. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on' Tues~ci'ay'~ Aug. 11,~1~87; at 7:30 P.H. at the Hound City Hal'1; 5341Haywood Road, Hound, Hinnesota, a hearing will be held qn th~ amendment-for the Conditional*Use Provisions of the B-1 Zoning District, Section 23.625.3, of the Hound Zoning Code to allow retail mail order :by CondT'tional' USe Per~it'.:"::-:...--=: ....... :: .i ... Such persons as desire.to be heard with reference to the above '"wll1 be heard at t'his meeting. lFr~n-Eene C. Clark, City Clerk ~ .,~,ood ~,, ,_.~ Street ~,.~. BUILDING ACTIVITY M~th d. June- NEW REStDENTIAT. CONSTRUCTION (Family) Total Family Units NEW RESIDENTIAL Grou~ & Translanl) 535,289 Total No,*Residential RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS Total Residential · NON-RESIDENTIAL ADDI- TIONS & ALTERATIONS Total Non-Residential TOTAL MONTH.AND YEAR TO DATE CONVERSIONS DEMOLITIONS Total Demolitions INS PECTION,~ COLLECTIONS ~"""'~"~ &Hech. TOTAL 26,500. 768,817. 3,156,5 3,156,522. 40,400 '167,385. 4,123,823. · oo ~. Street Add: ?,,. 5536~ City and BUILDING ACTIVITY REi~ORT Moath of May · NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION {FamlI~ Total Family Units NEW RESIDENTIAl. (Group & Tr&nllanl} Total Nob- FImlly NEW NON-RESIDENTtA}. TolII Non-Raaldentla! RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS lAND ALTERATIONS · Total Residential L ADDI- Total Non-Residential TOTAL MONTH AND YEAR TO DATE' CONVERSIONS DEMoLrrlONS Total Demolitions PERMITS, INSPECTION,~ COLLECTIONS ~'~,~,~ & Hech. ~w~,xa~x We I I r,~ Numbs' 1 ~ '] 9 793,89/d 3,700. 25,500. 50,500. 30I 2,621,233. 30 I 2,621,233. 108,300. 5,400. 73,243. 10,000. 140,885. -- 3,355,006.. 1,000,944. ! TOT~. 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 July 6, 1987 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Geno Hoff Street Supto SUBJECT: June's Activity Report The first job we had this month was the replacement of the railroad crossing in Seton. We have been working on this project for about two months. The problem being that we couldn't get any cooperation out of Dakota Rail, they always had some excuse why they couldn't work on it. Finally the 4th of June they called and said they were ready. They showed up with 7 men and no equipment, the understanding was that all the city had to do was cut the blacktop and repave the approach, well it didn't work out that way. The City crew did the completejob except lay the new rails and ties. We removed the rails and ties, subcut the track bed, hauled excess material away and repaved the approach. A job that should have taken 4 hours took the better part of 2 days. The street sweepers were busy this month, we cleaned the downtown area 7 times, mostly because of the contruction at the ~ank and VFW and also the City Days celebration. 'We repaved a section of Fairview Ln. that caved in 12' X 25' patch. We got 2 bids on some retaining wall repairs, 2 stone walls and 1 wood. Bjork County Stone Inc. got the bid, one stone wall was 30' X 4', the 2nd wall was 35' X 4' total price was $2,418.05. The wood wall was 80' X 18" cost to replace was $1,248.00, work has been completed. We had storm sewer problems on Emerald Dr. and Clover Cr. They were both dug up and repaired and the street patched. We are still working on streets and parking lots getting them ready for sealcoating. It's going slow because of all the extra work coming in. We hope to be ready the week of the 2Oth. STREET SIGN WORK We installed 2 Slow Children, 2 No Parking and 8 Stop signs. Someone is ripping off Stop signs, 6 in one weekend. STREET MATERIALS PURCHASED AND HAULED 547 gallons of tac oil 270 tons of blacktop 15 tons of 3/4 to dust red rock 16 tons of buckshot ~ CEMETARY Staked out 3 graves and 3 stones and cleaned up the dump area. 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 July 10, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR JUNE FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT COMPUTER UPDATE The training for the financial system was held in June. Judy Fisher, Gayle Burns and I went to Mankato for the training. We have started to enter in the chart of accounts on the new computer. It takes time because normal business activity must be completed before the new data can be done. INVESTMENTS The following is June investment activities: Balance 6L1-87 $7,043,939 BOUGHT: Jan-June Interest on funds American Nat'l 17,626 Farm Cr. 7.25 Due 9- 1-87 Dain 100,000 Farm Cr. 8.00 Due 6- 1-87 Dain 100,000 CD 7.75 Due 6- 1-88 Dain 100,000 FNMA 7.50 Due 10-1-87 Marquette 300,000 CD 6.85 Due 9-10-87 St. Bank Mound 140,000 CP 7.31 Due 12-10-87 Marquette 400,127 T Notes 7.53 Due 11-15-88 Dain 298,516 CD 6.85 Due 12-21-87 First MN 100,000 CP 6.90 Due 1-14-88 Piper 210,395 CP 6.80 Due 10-30-87 Dain 280,007 FNMA 7.25 Due 11-2-87 Dain 400,000 MATURED: Gov't Trust American Nat'l (65,000) CP 5.89 Marquette (100,054) Repo 6.75 Marquette (180,000) CP 6.4 Marquette (180,684) Repo 6.625 Marquette (170,000) CD 6.15 St. Bank Mound (125,000) CD 6.1 Marquette (420,000) CP 6.1 Dain (243,227) CD 6.5 St. Bank Mound (150,000) CP 6.6 Piper (240,238) Balance 6-30-87 $7,616,407 JUNE FINANCE REPORT JULY 10, 1987 PAGE 2 MOUND CITY DAYS I was involved with the Jaycees in coordinating the concessions at Mound Bay Park on S~turday and Sunday. I heard many positive comments about everything from the race up to the fireworks display. The weekend projected a positive image for the City of Mound. JN:ls CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 75 YEARS July 9, 1987 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City Manager Joyce Nelson Recycling Coordinator June's Recycling On Saturday, June 20 and also June 27 the compost site was open from 1:00 p.m. till 3:00 p.m. for the collection of grass clipping, leaves and garden weeds. The compost site won't be open again till fall there was only 1 person showed up between the 2 Saturdays. During June's pickup 396 stops were made, that makes about 13 percent of the households in Mound are recycling. So far this year 113.68 tons of material has been recycled from the City of Mound. This years goal is 230 tons. This figure does not include anything from the compost site which is measured in late fall. I'm sure we'll go over our 230 tons. The League of Women Voter of Crystal/New Hope produced a video about Solid Waste Management Proposals in Hennepin County. The name of this video is "TRASH". It will be played on Channel 20 so watch the paper for the day and time. 'june's total pickup was 17.45 tons. 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 July 9, 1987 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle ' City Manager Greg Bergquist City Mechanic June's Activity Report The first part o~ the months activites along with standard procedure was helping prepare for Mound City Days ie: making banner brackets, flag poles and light pole standards. Nine vehicles required servicing but the bulk of shop time this month was devoted to Parks Department equipment~ The heavy service mowers, trimmers and other Parks equipment get this time of the year requires them to be repaired in some way everyday. In the matter of Police equipment #844 th~ highest milage and oldest of the squads is starting to show its age. Major repairs will soon be needed. I believe this car is up for replacement after this budge~ year. Received the new hoist in June it has been installed but we are still waiting for some of the optional equipment to arrive. 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 M^YVVOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 July 9, 1987 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle City M~nager Greg Skinner Water & Sewer Supt. June's Activity Report WATER DEPT. We pumped 37,900,000 gallons of water for June. This is up 8.5 million gallons over May due to the dry weather. Through the first 6 months of 1987 the average amount pumped per month is 25.5 million gallons. This is an increase of approximately 7%. Water main breaks were down for the first 6 month in 1987 by 3o 7 in 1987 as compared to 10 in 1986. Again partly due to the mild winter. The amount of new customers connected to the City water has doubled in the first 6 months of 1987 (31) as to 16 in 1986. With the new "get tough policy" on delinquent water bills the amount of turn-off for the first half of the year is down to 27 for 1987, compared to 41 in 1986. As for the month of June it was business as usual. There were 1029 meters ~read out of 1052, 68 final readings, 11 meters tested and ready to be put back in service. Construction is moving at a fast pace, lots of plans and questions. Steven's Well pulled the #1 pump at the Booster Station. The motor and bearings were making unusual noises. Pump is back in service now and working fine. SEWER DEPT. Sewer line maintenance has been keeping Scott busy. He is working in the Tonkawood area. With Scott working on sewer line Damon has been working on lift stations, manhole repair and with the Street Dept. on locations and raising of manhole covers for the sealcoating project. For the first 6 month of 1987 there were 4 sewer back-ups the same as 1986. LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle, City Manager Len Harrell, Chief of Police Monthly Report for June, 1987 I. STATISTICS The police department responded to 756 calls for service in June. There was a significant rise in Part I offenseS from May to June. Thirty-two Part I offenses were reported in June, up 68%. Those offenses included 25 larcenies, 4 burglaries, i criminal sexual conduct, and 2 vehicle thefts. Part II crimes accounted for 61 calls; including 4 child abuse/neglect, 4 forgery/NSF checks, 16 criminal damage to property, 4 liquor law violations, 3 DWI's, 6 simple assaults, 9 domestics with 5 assaults, 3 harassment complaints, 7 runaway/incorrigibility, and 9 other offenses. The patrol division issued 95 adult citations; including 19 parking violations. Juveniles received 23 citations for various driving offenses. A total of 51 warnings were issued. One adult and 10 juveniles were arrested for felony offenses during the month. Twelve adults and 34 juveniles were arrested for misdemeanor violations. The department'responded to 18 medical emergencies, 9 property damage accidents, and 4 personal, injury accidents. There were 90 animal complaints during the month. The department assisted on 18 mutual aid calls. Property valued at $7,535 was stolen during the month of June. Traffic violations are down for-the second month due to the de-emphasis on traffic and the prohibition on stationary radar. Officers are continuing to do additional follow-ups of cases to assist in the increase of cases needing additional investigative work. II. INVESTIGATION Approximately forty-two hours of investigative time was spent on 8 different cases of child abuse/neglect. One case alone accounted for 30 hours of investigative follow-up. That case involves a man in his twenties who has been sexually abusing an elementary school boy. The cases that were investigated during the month included 3 worthless check cases, 2 auto thefts, theft of video tapes, a domestic case, a runaway, and several thefts. SEt. Hudson attended a local socfal service providers committee.to' assist in defining local, needs. Sgt. Hudson was assigned for one week to work with Officer Limond who was hired in June. Hudson familiarized Officer Limond with the facilities used by local law enforcement, and also worked on report writing and proper forms to be used for reporting. Eight formal complaints were issued in June. Among.. the complaints were violation of a protection order, reckless driving, criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, fleeing a police officer, and DWI. The department, has had 38 child protection cases in the first six months of 1987~ III. MANPOWER Officer Todd Limond was hired June 22,1987, to replace Kyle Larson. Todd will be trained under a field training officez for a period of several months and will.serve a probation of one year. Officers used twenty-two days of vacation, 6 days of comp-time, 2 holidays, and 2 days towards training. The police secretary also used 8 vacation days in June. Officer Grand spent some time i~ the schools for the last week of the year to assist with control problems. Robert Meuwissen will be doing a two month internship with the department for his law enforcement degree through Mankato State University. IV. OVERTIME There were 15 hours of overtime used to cover short shifts in June. An addi- tional 22 hours of ~vertime was used during Mound City Days to provide security for the'race, parade, and the fireworks. There was some additional overtime due to late cases and. arrest situations. V. TRAINING Only two days were used for training in June. ThrOugh the s~,mmer months, training will be kept to a minimum due to vacations and patrol needs. VI. POLICE RESERVES 'The police reserves donated 371 hours to the police department in June. Community service functions accounted for 117 hours of time, including Mound City Days. Reserve officers were involved in 139.5 hours of ride-alongs with regular officers. The reserve account is currently in excess of $6,500. P I CRIMES o ~ o ~ ~o ~ o ADULT. JUV Homicide .. ~al Sexual Conduct 1 1 1 1 Robbery Assault Bur$1ary ~ 2 Larceny 25 1 1 7 1 10 Vehicle Theft 2 1 ~rson TOTAL 32 4 2 8 2 10 PART II CRIMES · Child Abuse/Neglect 4 Forgery/NSF Checks 4 2 2 2 Criminal Dsm~e to Property 16 1 1 3 Weapons Narcotic Laws Liquor Laws .. 4 4 4 9 . 3. 3 '3 · 6 '2 1 2 5 Simple Assault Domestic Assault 5 1 2 1 1 Domestics (No Assault) 4 ~arassment 3- Runaway/incorrigibility/Truancy 7 1 5 5 Public Peace 3 1 1 '~ 6 i 2 6 A11 Other'Offenses TOTAL 61 3 13 21 10 ' 29 PART III.!&~PARTIV Property Damage Accidents 9 Personal Injury Accidents 4 'f Fatal Accidents 0 Medicals 18 i A~al Compl~nts 90 18 Ot~ General Investi ations 524 TOTAL 663 · 756 7 15 29 12 39 TOTAL ACTIVITIES ,,, POLICE/CRINE ACTIVITY I~i~ORT , MONTH JUNE YEAR 1987 GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS THIS YEAR LAST YEAR MONTH TO DATE TO DATE Hazardous Citations 39 726 --686 Non-Hazardous Citations 38 328 298 Hazardous Warnings 14 233 268 Non-Hazardous Warnings 19 496 574 Verbal Warnings ' 61 422 - ParkinE Citati6ns 6 209 416 DWI 3 55 '67 OVER .10 3 40 44 Property DamaEe Accidents 9 49 35 Personal In.jury Accidents 4 22 14 Fatal Accidents 0 0 0 Adult Felony Arrests' 1 28 32 Adul~-MiSd~mea~o~ Arrests 12 153 262 Adult Misdemeanor Citations 13 44 51 Juvenile Felony A~rests 10 35 17 Juvenile MisdemeanorArrests 34 74 68 Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 16 34 21 Part I Offense~ 32 169 185 Part II Offenses' 61 414 459 Medicals 18 95 93 Animal Complaints 90 572 600 Other General Investigations 524 2,608 2,568 TOTAL 1,007 6,806 6,760 Assists 38 246 436 Follow_Ups· 55 265 287 ' C i ty, ..... MOUND Month JU~E 'CITATIONS ADULT I or 0UI 3 Hore than .lOJ BAC 3 Careless/Reckless Drlvin9 Orivln9 After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle Speeding 19 No DL or Expired DL Restriction on DL Improper, Expired, or No Plates 20 Illegal Passing Stop Si~n Violations Failure to Yield Equipment Violations . 5 H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance 2 ~of-- Unsa___~fe_ Turn l~bver t~e Center1 i ne park'in~'V..iolat'ions 19 Crosswalk Do9 Ordinances Derelict Autos His~ellaneous Tags TOTALS 95 WARNINGS No Insurance 7 Traffic 14 Equipment. 13 '"' Crosswalk A~imal s 6 Trash/Derelict Autos 7 Other ).TOTAL_. L ARRESTS Felony Mi sdemeanor 3 2 19 87-' JUV 2. i 1 23 1 PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SUHHARY Bikes Snowmobiles ITEH Boats, Hotors, Trailers Clothing Currency, Jewelry Guns Notes, Etc. & Precious Hetals Home Furnishings STOLEN $ 270 20 ~12 409 RECOVERED $ 20 50 100 5 $ 175 Radio g Electronic Equipment ~ehicles & Vehicle Equipment Miscellaneous.' TOTAL 3,714 110 2,600 $7,535 RESERVES MONTHLY REPORT Mound Police June,' 1987 NAME ECO RS RA TR IN CS AD MT TOTAL Hawks ~ 17.5 15 _2 34.5 Thompson 26 22 30 2 80 St. Cyr 13.5 17 2 32.5 Vogel 1.5 30 14.5 2 48 Niccum 3.5 19 3.5 36 2 2 66 Stahlbusch 12.5 2 2 16.5 Manthei 4.5 51 21 15 2 93.5 TOTAL 9.5 139.5 21 3.5 134.5 49 14 3~1.~ ECO - Emergency call outs 2 Transports to detox 1 Transport to jail RS - Reserve squad RA - Ride along with regular officer TR - Training received by member New member training program IN - Instruction given by member New member CS - Community Service details Graduation party Contel bike rodeo Bud Grant Golf Classic (Medina PD) Mound City Days - Administrative AD - Monthly meeting 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 July 1, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL JIM FACKLER, PARKS DIRECTOR~ V JUNE REPORT GENERAL COMMENT Time spent in June has been in varied areas. Mound City Days required a lot of preparation of Mound Bay Park in trimming, painting and equipment placement to meet deadlines. Because of this, we fell behind in mowing City properties and parks. With the hiring of a new seasonal employee, to replace one who did not return from last season, has helped to catch up. With the addition of the rip rap project this season and for the next three years, there is a need for an additional seasonal employee. We are also looking at replacement of parks play equipment and installation of new equipment by city crews. If monies are approved for this equipment, we will have to have this additional seasonal person to do installation of equipment and site preparation. CEMETERY The lack of precipitation has not helped the grounds at the cemetery, and .bas slowed down the mowing needed. The caretaker, Howard Simar, has been busy resetting headstones that have settled. COMMONS The low water level of Lake Minnetonka continues to create problems. With docks not being accessible, both commons and private, we have been receiving alot of calls. The Jennings Bay dredge is still being worked on and has consumed alot of time. We hope to have a conclusion to this in July. It now is being looked at as a private dredge from the Jennings Bay Association with the City coming in later to dredge along Dove Lane only. PARKS DEPARTMENT JUNE 1987 REPORT JULY 1, 1~87 PAGE 2 TREE REMOVAL June has been slow on tree removal. We have scheduled four trees to be felled and Three Points Park trimmed. There has been three complaints on hazardous trees on private property that needed notices sent. SUMMER PARKS The parks program has began and is at Clover Circle Park, Three Points Park, Belmont Park and Swenson Park. Kelli Heyer is the Program Super- visor. PARKS We are in the process of getting the Parks caught up id mowing, li'tter pick up and equipment repair. Again with the rip rapping project on the Commons, there is a need for an additional seasonal maintenance man. Some of our parks are being used as a disposal for lawn clippings, brush and leaves. We hauled two pickup loads, from Three Points Park alone, that was left by residents. JF.' ls 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYVVOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 July 2, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER JUNE 1987 MONTHLY REPORT Sales for the month of June were $82,665. Sales for the month of June last year were $79,027. We had one more day of business in June of this year, compared to June of last year. To date this year, sales are $390,465. Last year at this time sales were $378,088. For the first six months of this year we have had 44,719 customers. This is almost identical with last year at the same time when our customer count was 44,447. Therefore, the $12,377 increase in sales is due primarily to the cost of goods rising. A good part of our time spent in June focused on adjusting liquor, wine and beer prices. For the most part, when I say adjusting I mean raising prices. The increase in state excise taxes went into effect June 1st on alcohol beverages. On the average, a bottle of liquor rose about 10¢ on a pint to anywhere between 20¢ to 40¢ on a one liter size. About 50¢ to 75¢ on a 1.75 liter size. Beer rose a nickel a six pack and 15¢ per case. Wine was affected also. A 750 ML-bottle went up about a dime. Larger size bottles of wine such as 3L's and 4L's took a 20¢ to 40¢ hike. Some.wine categories were hit more brutally. Sparkling wines (champagnes) and h~ghly fortified (high alcoholic content) dessert wines took a double beating. With the end of June comes our annual mid-year inventory. It seems to me every time I turn around we are having one. Inventory was conducted June 30th at 8:00 PM, after we closed for the day. Hopefully, by August 1st I will be able to report to you the outcome of the inventory. JK:ls 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 July 7, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK J~NE MONTHLY REPORT The City had 2 regular Council Meetings and 2 special Council Meetings in June with 16 resolutions. Legal notices for the two special meetings were prepared and published. There was Agenda preparation and items to clear up. after each meeting. The improvement hearing notices on the County Road 15 Improvements and street light replacement were prepared, published, posted and mailed in a timely manner to the affected property owners. The list of property owners affected supplied by the City Engineer was checked against Our tax books to assure that the current owner received the notice. Notices for all the public hearings on Planning Commission items that came to the Council in June and will come to the Council the beginning of July were sent' to all affected persons. Note that any notices sent on public hearings have affidavits of search, mailing (listing the persons and property identification numbers of each affected property), and some posting that have to be filled out and notarized to make them legal. Final Mound City Days preparation was handled on the parade and fireworks. I worked on a card index for the following: City owned property; Tax forfeit property that has been retained by the City for a public purpose; Tax forfeit property that falls into the following catagories: a. Property released for public sale; b. Property for sale only to adjoining property owners. There are 303 parcels. Each card has a PID (property identification number), plat and parcel, legal description, status (what it is, park, wetlands, tax forfeit, etc.), whose name it is in (State Land Dept. or City of Mound or both), any resolutions dealing with the parcel (date passed and resolution number). I still have to coordinate the Certificates of Titles, State Deeds, easements, etc., for the parcels that are the City's. This list, when all the information is on the cards and kept up-to-date will be invaluable when someone calls in to check on a parcel of land. I updated, by department, the pay increases for budget purposes. 10 parcels of land will be on the Council Agenda for July 14th. 9 of the parcels were tax forfeit at one time. 1 parcel is city owned land. Ail research, maps, memos of. explanation, and proposed resolutibns was completed. fo MONTH OF /~"~ MONTH MONTH TO DATE TO DATE NO, OF CALLS MOUND - FlEE H'TON~ BEACM - FIRE EHERGENCY HI NNETRISTA - FIRE ORONO - F~ R~ ~E.~NCY SHOREWOOD - FI RE EMERGENCY SPRING PARK- FIRE ENERGENCY ~UTUAL AID - FIRE i EMERGENCY .TOTAL FIAE CALLS . TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS COMMERI CAL RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL G~SS ~ ~SC~LLANEOUS AUTO FALSE ALARH NO. OF HOURS - MOUND FIRE TOTAL - MT~ BCH FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL -M'TRISTA FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL - O~ONO F~ EHERGENCY · TOTAL - SHOREWOOD FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL -SP. PARK FIRE EMERGENCY' TOTAL -nUTUAL AiD Fl.~ E~ERGENCY TOTAL TOTAL ~IRE HOURS TOTAL ~IRE ~ EHERGENCY HOURS MUTUAL AID RECEIVED MUTUAL AID GIVEN O. Anderson '~/ ~ f- /q~ ~-~ $,00 , G. Babb '/ '" ~ /~ ~ ~ ~ ~. 00 ~ m -- J. Beauch~p ' / ./ ~ /~.w ~ / ' 6.'00 · ~. ~ov~ / ~ ~ ~- ~ , 6.oo D. Bryce / / ~ ~/% ~ .: ~. 6.50 ~_ ~,,~' / / ~ /%~ /% 6.oo, ~o~- s. co~.~ / ~ / g~ /~' 6.00' s. ~=,~,~,. '. / ~. ~ /f~- ~'~ .~.oo .I /¢~- s. ~=~.-~o.. / / ~ ./~-- ~' ~.oo /~- , .~. ~rw~s / ~' '~ N ~ ~ t ~ 6.oo /~ . L. Heitz' :.. ~ / m /~ ~/ ~. 6.00 C: He~derso~. / / ~ ' /¢~ ,. ~ 6.00 /r4 .... u. ~z~e~. ~ / ~" /P~ ~ 6.oo ' ~J2-- S. Landsman / / · ~ /~ ~ 6.00 '.R. ~sc~Xe , / / '~' /f~ " ~/ 6.25 ' / ~. ~ ~. ~tus-" ./ / ~ ../%~ .¢/ 6.oo ~ . z. opitz' / ~3 / .%~ - 3'~ ~.o0 B. Palm '/ ~ ~ /~ ~ ~/ 6. O0 /;~-- .,'"G" ~Z~. . / / ~ /f-- . ~ 6. O0 /3~ - M. Palm /'. ~ ~ /~ ~ ~ 6.00 T. ' ~asmussen / / ~ /f ~ ~ 6. O0 /~-- u. s~w~e / ~ ' ~ /~ ~ ~f ~.oo /~- ~, $~m~n / ~ ~ /~ ~ 3~ 6.00 ~/~-- T.' Swenson ~ / ~ /~ ~f 6;00 W. Swenson / ~ ~ /f ~ /~ ~. OO ~-- 'R. Williams / / ~ /f ~ ~g 6.00 /Y[- T. Wi[li~s / / ~ ff ~ ~ 6.00 0 0 0 .0 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT ~ZN~N~,,CE FO~ ~"U~~I=-- 1¢~7 MEN ON DUTY J. Andersen G. Anderson J. Babb J. Beauchamp D. Boyd D. Bryce S. Bryce D. Carlson S. Collins M. David 'B. Erickson S. Erickson J. Garvais L. Heitz C. Henderson G. Johnson M. Kleeberger B. Landsman R. Marschke J. Nafus TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS M. Nelson A. Opttz B. Palm G. Palm -'M. Palm G. Pederson D. Platzer T. Rasmussen M. Savage T. Stallman T. Swenson W. Swenson M. Tobey R. Williams T. Williams Disclpllne .and Team York Critique of Fires Pre-Planning ~.lnspectlons ~ools 'Hand ~earlng Films First Aid Uge of & Apparatus Identifying Extingu|sher Operation Protect.lye Clothlng and ResCue Op~ratlon Self-Contalned Mqsks ~nUNO VOLUNTEER FiRE DEPARTM~''T "- MOUND, MZNNESOTA 5536~'~ ' D R I L L R E P O RT Time , .~.l/~. Pumper Oper~tlon Fire Streams ~; Friction Loss liouse Burnl ng:¢ Natural ~ Oc~nstrat 1 Ladder Evolutlons Salvage Radlo OperatlO~s ltouse Evol Nozzle ~ IIose Allin.ce Inhalator Operation NOTE: HouYs. Training Pald X Excused X Uncxcused 0__ P~c~ent, Ilot Pald ~//~--,1 Andersen '~l~,1 Garvais ' '~g/.~;.. M ~-~-"~3:'.-An-d'ersOn" '~'~L Hertz .... ~"~'/~ G ~//~ J Babb ~/~C Henderson ''~ O ...~V~j Beauchamp ~ G Johnso~ ~f/~T ~1~ D Boyd '~/~ M Kleeberger ~)/~M ~1~ O Bryce ~ B Landsman ~/~e ~',S Bryce ~/~ e ~arschke - '~.V~ T S Collins '~ R Op~tz ~/~ M David ~ B E~ckson ~/~ B Palm ~/~ R '~l/~S Er~cks0n' ~i/~ G Palm ~'/~ T Palm Peders0n Platzer Rasmussen Savage Stallman Stallman Swens0n Swenson Tobey Will iams Williams mmmmmmmm MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 D R I L L R E P O RT Date 6-'~'2Z.__... Discipline'and Team l~ork Critique of Fires ~reLPlannlng &.Inspections ~ools ~ Apparatus identifying Hand Extinguisher Operation ~earlng Protective Clothing Films First Aid and ResCue Operation Uge of Self-Contalned HQsks Time Time Pumper Opcr,~t ion ..... Fire Strea,ns & Friction Loss ........ . fi tiouse Burnmn9~ .... Natural & Propane Gas Talk . & Dcmonstratlons Ladder Evolution.~ - ~ ..... Salvage Operations _. ~ Radio OperatiOns ltouse Evol u~ic, ns ....... Noz~'le C Ilose Allln,,ce _-. ...... Inhalator Operation NOTE: HouYs'Tralning Paid Hi sca1 l afieous X Excused X UnexcusJd O_ Pic'.,e,~t, t{ot Pald ~/~ J Andersen. . ~ "~'FAn-d'e rs o n ~ Ua-- ~1 .Babb · ..~)/~_J BeaUchamp o Boyd . ~/;L. D Bryce ~ ~'.S Bryce Carl son S Col 1 i ns ~/~M David ~/~B Erickson ~I/~S Erickson ~l~_j Garvais '~?/~'L Heitz ~/a-C Henderson -JJ/a-- G Johnson '~/~M K1 eeberger ~V.~B Landsman ~/~- R Marschke ~F~M Nelson ~'/~A Opi tz ~Y/~G P a I m Palm Pederson P1 a~czer Rasmussen Savage Stallman Stallman Swenson Swenson Tobey Will iams A'I-I"ENDANCE/ LOCATION OATH OF OFFICE OPEN AGENDA CLERK' S REPORT REPORTS TREASURER' S. REPORT DISTRICT ' REPORTS PERSONNEL TRANSACTIONS COH. SERV. COUNCIL APPOINTHENT 'WESTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 5600 Lynwood Boulevard Mound, Minnesota 55364 REGULAR SCHOOL BOARD MEETING JUNE 8, 1987 (Minutes to be approved July 13, 1987) The regular meeting of the school board was called to order at 8:03 p.m. in the Lecture Hall of the Westonka Community Center. Present: Board Members Chelberg, Fritz, Hallowell, Mayer, Pechtel, Pitsch, and Schmidt; Member-elect Frahm; Asst. Supt. Myers, Business Manager Schmidt," P.R. coordinator, administrators, staff, students, parents, and public. Absent: Supt. Stevenson. The Oath of Office was administered to Gretchen Hallowell and Thomas Frahm, who were elected to three year terms on May lgth. Treasurer'Fritz welcomed John Lock and Charles Landsman, boy scouts, who were attending the meeting to earn merit badges in communications. Motion by Chelberg, seconded by Hallowell, that the school board approve as presented the minutes of the regular/election meeting of May 19, 1987. Motion approved by unanimous roll call vote, all members present. Treasurer Fritz thanked department heads for their input on budget cuts for 1988-89 and stated the materials will be shared at the June 22 study session. The Policy Committee will schedule a study session in July to study the proposed changes to the Attendance Policy. Motion by Chelberg, seconded by Schmidt~ that the school board approve as presented the current financial documents and Treasurer's Report indicating present balances, including bills paid after the last board meeting; and further resolved that the school board approve the payment of current bills and claims and routine transfer of funds for budget maintenance.* On roll call vote all members voted aye, all present. The following reports were presented: Larry Litman and Mary Harty- Norblom reviewed the district program for the Academically Talented. Victor Niska presented a summary of studies relative to the Use of Seat Belts on School Buses. Gaylen Thostenson and Dr. Wayne Smith reported on the Attainment of Respective Building Goals for the 1986-87 School Year. Dr. Pam Myers reported on the Implementation of Policy 6139 - Curriculum Review, 198§-87. Chelberg moved, seconded by Schmidt, that the personnel transactions be approved as recommended.* Roll call vote: all aye, all members present. Motion by Chelberg, dual second by Schmidt and Pechtel, that the school board appoint Carol Sandberg to the Community Services Advisory Council beginning June l, 1987, for a term of two years. On roll call vote the motion was approved unanimously, all members present. DIST. 287 JOINT BOARD REPRESENT. Motion by Chelberg, seconded by Hallowell, that the school board appoint Judson H. Anderson as a member of the District 287 Joint Board and representative of District 277 for a two-year term ending June 30, 198g. Motion unanimously approved on roll call vote, all members present. Mr. Anderson was present and suggested the new superintendent and board member be introduced to District 287 via a visit to the campus and dinner. MILK BIO BLOCK GRANT APPROVED. ENABLING BUDGET SUPT. EMPLOYED OPEN AGENDA Fritz seconded the motion by Chelberg that the school board accept the bid 'of Meyer Bros. Dairy, Inc. of Wayzata, for 1987-88 milk supplies.* Unanimously approved by roll call vote, all members present. Schmidt and Hallowell seconded the motion by Chelberg that the ~chool board approve application for available 1987-88 Block Grant monies, and does declare its intention to develop projects which expand and improve the educational program of the district, as stated in the Applicant Statement of Assurances,-and authorizes the Superintendent to execute and file application for and i.n behalf of the school district, and otherwise to act as its authorized representative in State 'and Federally funded programs. Dr. Myers gave an overview of the Block Grant history and variety of uses for the funds. On roll call vote the motion was unanimously approved, all members present. Motion by Chelberg, seconded by.P~chtel, that the school board approve the 1987-88 Enabling Budget as set forth in agenda Item #10.* All members voted aye on roll call vote, all present. Motion approved unanimously. Chelberg moved, seconded by Hallowell, that Dr. James L. Smith be employed as superintendent of the Westonka Public Schools, effective July l, 1987. On roll call vote, all members voted aye, all present. Chairman Pitsch thanked the Perosnnel Committee and all board members for the time spent conducting the superintendent search. Dr. Myers inquired whether the school bJard desired the district-wide survey results, now available, presented via an item in the school board agenda. Hallowell's question on setting of school board goals for next year was answered by Pitsch, who stated it will be done as early as possible after the new superintendent takes office. All present were reminded of the district-wide picnic planned for Sept. 13 by the Staff Renewal Committee. Chelberg thanked the community for the privilege of serving on the school board for the past nine years. Chairman Pitsch assured her all have appreciated the time and effort she has put forth over the years and all present gave her a standing ovation. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at lO:15 p.m. Patricia C. Chelberg, Clerk Rodney L. Pitsch, Chairman *Complete documentation can be found ~/~ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 6121473-7033 FRANK MIXA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD MEMBERS Robert Rascop. Chairmen Shorawood JoEIlen Hurr, Vice Chairman Orono Mark Westlund, Secretary Wayzata Wally Clevenger, Treasurer ainnetri~ta aawin Bjorlin Tonka Bay Jan Boewinkel Minnetonka Beach Richard J. Garwood Deephaven Peter Hill Victoria Ron Kraemer Spring Park Richard Nelson Greenwood Robert K. Pillsbury ainnetonka Thomas W. Reese Mound Robert E. Slocum Woodland Carl H. Walsser Excelsior June 25, 1987 TO: ~ MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT MUNICIPALITIES Attached is the 1988 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District budget which is generally categorized as to purpose. It has been certified by the LMCD Board of Directors at its regular meetin§ June 24, 1987. Minnesota. Statute Chapter 907, Section 4 ~pfovides: "Expense of the district shall be borne by the municipalities. The portion of the expenses borne by each municipality shall be in proportion to its assessed valuation." Section 5 provides: The board of directors of the district shall on -or before July 1 of each y.ear, prepare a detailed budget of its need for the next calendar year and certify the budget on that date to the governing body of each municipality in the district together' with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be provided by each municipality. The governing body of each municipality in the district shall review the budget, and the directors, upon notice from any.municipality, shall hear objec- tions to the budget and may, after the hearing, modify or amend the budget, and then give notice to the municipalities of modi- fications or amendments. It shall be the duty of the governing body or board of supervipors of each municipality in the dis- trict to provide the funds necessary to meet its proportion of the total cost to be borne by the municipalities as finally certified by the directors, the funds to be raised by any means within the authority of the municipalities and to pay the funds into the treasury of the district in amounts and at times the treasurer of the district may require. The municipalities may each levy a tax not to exceed one mill on the taxable prop- erty located therein, to provide such funds. Said levy shall be within all other limitations provided by law. This budget reflects anticipated changes in activity of the District to implement the recommendations of the Metro Task Force on Lake Minnetonka. To continue the development of a Comprehensive Lake Management Plan, $15i000 has been added in Consulting Service, and $25,000 in Contingency. The $50,000 for planning is expected for a three year period, with at least one half to be supported outside the tax levy. ~ake Minnetonka Conservation District LMCD Municipalities June 25, 1987 Pa§e 2 To ensure continued development of the Comprehensive Plan, $25,000 was placed in Contingency. Efforts will continue to gain financial support from interested area-wide agencies to offset a share of this expense. To further develop the LMCD Public Information Program, $10,000 has been budgeted. The District is continuing to develop its legislative program for 1988 to support research, development, and funding for the regional aspects of the program. The District has also adjusted its fee schedule for additional support. These programs have been initiated in response to the Metropolitan Council Task Force on Lake Minnetonka recommendations, which will be reported to the legislature next January. If you have any questions regarding this budget or any particular information as it relates to the activities of the District, please contact me. Respectfully submitted, Mixa; Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District FM:jm enc: 1988 Adopted Budget June 22, 1987 Memo to LMCD Board c/enc: LMCD Board Members LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1988 BUDGET Adopted. June 24, 1987 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 1988 BUDGET REVENUE LMCD Communities Other Income TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE DISBURSEMENTS General Fund - Administration Personal Services Salaries Auditing Services Total Personal Services Contractual Services Telephone POstage Prntg., Pub., & Adv. Utilities Maintenance - Office Equipment Janitorial Services Other Contractual Services Total Contractual Services Commodities & Supplies Office Supplies Books & Periodicals General Supplies Total Commodities & Supplies Other Char~es Office Rent Insurance & Bonds Memberships Employer Contributions Mileage & Expenses Total Other Charges 1985 1986 1987 1987 1988 Actual Actual Jan-Apr Estimate Adopted $ 49,975 $ 49,975 $ 45,970 $ 62,912 $ 91,048 52,304 80,283 67,354 77,100 103,100 $102,279 $130,258 $113,324 $140,012 $194,148 $ 58,633 $ 61,299 $~1,443 $65,272 $ 67,883 500 500 -- 600 600 59,133 61,799 21,443 65,872 68,483 782 650 220 680 780 1,412 1,786 516 1,500 1,800 750 783 945 1,200 1,200 213 299 59 360 360 941 1,541 261 1,800 1,800 645 675 210 720 780 924 2,114 265 2,400 2,400 5,667 7,848 2,476 8,660 9,120 2,390 1,620 745 2,262 1,900 161 97 -- 135 175 241 199 213 320 235 2,792 1,916 958 2,717 2,310 3,600 3,600 1,200 4,005 4,005 1,518 1,468 -- 1,900 1,900 235 245 125 260 255 9,306 9,669 3,382 10,140 10,700 1,162 982 86 1,200 1,325 15,821 15,964 4,793 17,505 18,185 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 1988 BUDGET 1985 Actual DISBURSEMENTS (cont) General Fund - Administration (cont) Capital Outlay Office Furniture, Fixtdres & Equipment Total Capital Outlay TOTAL GENERAL FUND - ADMINISTRATION General Fund - Legal Legal Services Prosecutions Total General Fund - Legal General Fund - Consulting Services Consulting Services Total General Fund - Consulting Services General Fund - Committees & Contingency Committees & Contingency Total General Fund - Committees & Contingency SUB TOTAL GENERAL FUND - DISBURSEMENTS General Fund - Public Information 1986 1987 1987 1988 Actual Jan-Apr Estimate Adopted $ 4,731 $ 1,180 $ 92 4,731 1,180 92 $ 1,350 $ 1~550 1,350 1,550 $ 88,144 $ 88,707 $~9~.762 $ 96,104 $ 99,648 17,055 14,187 2,935 15,000 15,000 -- 13,805 2,121 15,000 15,500 17,055 27,992 5,056 30,000 30,500 4,609 Public Information Program Total General Fund - Public Information 1,839 714 1,839 714 TOTAL GENERAL FUND- DISBURSEMENTS 4,609' 10,000 25,000 10,000 25,000 4,000 29~000 4,000 29,000 $109,808 $118,538 $35,532 $140,104 $184,148 $118,538 $35,532 $109,808 -- 10,000 -- 10,000 $140,104 $194,148' 6-25 -87 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 1988 BUDGET DISTRIBUTION OF EXPENSE Deephaven Excelsior Greenwood Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound Or,no Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Victoria Wayzata Woodland Total Assessed Value (1,000's) $ 45,936 23,161 9,333 528,008 12,521 36,309 68,683 103,552 53,060 16,192 21,114 18,243 62,199 11,584 $1,009,895 % of Total Assessed Valuation 4.5% 2.3 0.9 52.3 1.2 3.6 6.8 10.3 5.3 1.6 2.1 1.8 6.2 1.1 100.0% 1/3 Mil Taxable $ 15,312 7,203 3,111 40,058 4,174 12,103 22,894 34,517 i7,687 5,397 7,038 6,081 20,733 3,861 $200,169 % of Budget Resulting from $18,210 Maximum to Minnetonka 7.6% 3.8 1.9 20.0 2.0 6.0 11.4 17.2 8.8 2.6 3.5 3.0 10.3 1.9 100.0% Share of $91,048 1988 Budget $ 6,.920 3,460 1,730 '18,210 1,821 5,463 10,379 15,660 8,012 2,367 3,187 2,731 9,378 1,730 $91,048 6-25-87 Lake Minnatonka Conservation 1988 BUDGET District COMPARISON 1987 - 1988 TAX LEVIES Deephaven Excelsior Greenwood Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound Orono Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Victoria Wayzata. Woodland Share of $62,912 1987 Budget $ 4,907 2,391 1,007 '12,582 1,195 3,901 7',046 11,073 5,599 1,636 2,139 1,950 6,228 1,258 Share of $91,048 1988 Budget $ 6,920 3,460 7 1,730 '18,210 1,821 5,463 10,379 15,660 8,012 2,367 3,187 2,731 9,378 1,730 C~ange ..$28~136 +$ 2,013 + 1,069 + 723 + 5,628 + 626 + 1,562 + 3,333 + 4,587 + 2,413 + 731 + 1,048 + 781 + 3,150 + 472 Total $62,912 $91,048 +$28,136 *Maximum by law. 6-25-87 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRI(~T TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ~ LMCD BOARD of DIRECTORS Executive Committee June 22, 1987 (revised June 24, 1987) 1988 Proposed Budget Attached is the proposed 1988 budget for the District as modified. The total budget request of $194,148 represents an increase of $28,136 from last year's $62,912 levy, and an increase of $26,700 over last year's Other Income of $77,100. Other Income includes license and permit fees, court fines, interest, and other miscel- laneous revenue. Distribution of the levy to the villages would also be an increase of approximately 44.7% over last year, depending on relative changes in assessed values. The budget now levies approximately 45% of the 1/3 mil allowable under the Statute, compared with 32.8% last year, 39.8% in 1983, and 75% in 1975. The budget provides the following adjustments: 1. 4% for salary adjustments. 2. An increase of parttime office clerical from 12 to 15 hours per week° Continued adjustment in the Capital Outlay to replace funds expended for the Xerox, Memorywriter, 'and for other future office equipment purchases. 4. Office equipment maintenance contracts. 5. Provision has been made for increased insurance costs. e Provision has been made for an increase from $10,000 to $25,000 for anticipated consulting services, and $25,000 added to Con- tingency to develop a Comprehensive Plan. 7. $10,000 is included for a Public Information Program° The Metropolitan Council Task Force on Lake Minnetonka recommended certain changes in LMCD activity levels to meet increased management demands on Lake Minnetonka. The LMCD legislative proposals, the development of a Comprehensive Plan for the Lake, and an increase in Public Information Program to improve visibility of the District and its programs are proposed in response to the Task Force recom- mendations. The cost of these proposals for 1988 are reflected in this budget. Comprehensive Plan costs are to be spread over a three year period. Metro will report to the Legislature on the progress of these programs next January. (more) LAKE M INN ETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT LHCD Board of Directors June 22, 1987 Page 2 , To ensure continued development of the Comprehehsive Plan, $25,000 has been p~aced in Contingency as backup. Efforts will continue to gain financial support from interested area-wide agencies. The Contingencies and Reserve fund of $53,338 is below the District limit of one-half the budget as of the end of 1986. The reserve funds are currently committed as follows: Upper Watershed Project guarantee Reserve for delayed legal expense Equipment depreciation reserve License and permit fee reserve Interest reserve Total $15,000 2 5o'O 16,500 15,100 4,238 $53,338 License fees and fee deposits were adjusted in 1987. The budget provides for counsulting engineering or other services. eric: 1988 Budget MEMO TO: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers FROM: E.A. Hickok and Associates DATE: June 18, 1987 RE: Lake Level, Flow and Precipitation summary for April and May, 1987. Lake levels in Lake Minnetonka have continued to decline through April and May as illustrated by the attached graph and lake elevations. There has been virtually no discharge from Lake Minnetonka into Minnehaha Creek since October 20, 1987. Minnehaha Creek at the Browndale Avenue Dam in Edina has maintained a flow rate of approximately 4 cfs throughout both April and May. This is shown by the Monthly Flow Summary. The 30 year average precipitation for April and May at the National Weather Service Station in Maple Plain is 6.28 inches. The actual precipitation recorded in Wayzata for April and May was 2.06. A summary of precipitation is attached. 950.00 929.80 929.60 929,40 929.20 - 9~9.00 - 92~.80 - 928.20 - 9:28 927.80 927'60 92?.40 927,20 927.00 07~Jul--86 Minnehoha Creek Watershed Districi I_oWe Mtka WoOer Elev,::~ion~ -- 1986--1987 NOHW(929.4) RUNOUT ELEVATION (928.6) I I I I I I 15--0ct--86 25-J=n--87 0~-- Moy--87 Dote I 1 1 -Aug-87 MC~D Water Elevations - Lake Minnetonka Date Elevation Flow 09-Ju!-86 929.44 125 l-Jul -86 929.42 125 i4-uU~-~6 , .."., .-",,, i= i5-Ju!-96 929.~5 !25 iS-Ju!-~ 929.U0 100 21-Jui-86 929.28 75 23-Jul-S6 929.22 75 25-Jui-86 929.18 50 28-Ju!-86 929.!5 50 50-Jui-86 929.15 50 01-Aug-86 929.09 50 04-Auo'86 928.98 ~ 07-Aug-86 928.92 12 ~1-Auo-86 928.86 '~ 13-Aug-86 928.82 12 15-Aug-86 928.82 12 1o-~ug-~6 928.88 12 mug o6 928.88 I2 25-Auo-~ 928.84 ~ Date Elevation Flow Date Elevation Flow 27-Aug-86 929.84 12 lO-Oct-86 928.60 75 29-Aug-86 928.78 12 t,]-0ct-86 9~.60 75 O,]-Sep-S& 928.74 12 15-0ct-86 928.50 50 05-Seo-86. 928.78 ,~ ~,,_~._~n.+ =~928.51 5 O8-Seo-B6 929.75 ~ 20-~ct-86 9~8.~, 0 10-Se)-B6 928.75 12 22-0ct-86 928.51 0 ~o ~ '~ =' 928.51 12-Sep-86 9=~.70 ~'~ =4-uc~-~o 0 15-SeD-86 928.68 20 27-0ct-86 928.52 0 17-Sep-86 928.70 20 29-0ct-96 928.54 0 19-Sep-86 9=~.7, .]0 ,]1-0ct-86 9=..~.~ 0 22-Sep-86 ~28.88 50 O~-Nov-86 928.51 0 24-8ep-8~ 928.87 75 07-Nov-86 928.46 0 26-Sep-86 928.90 100 11-Nov-86 928.48 0.5 29-Sep-86 928.$8 125 17-Nov-86 928.41 1 01-Oct-B6 928.82 150 24-No¥-86 928.44 0 0,]-0ct-86 928.80 150 08-Dec-~ 928.a2 0 06-0ct-86 928.70 !50 ,- ~o o, ~-~c-~o 928.40 0 08-0~t-86 928.65 Z25 09-~an-@7 928..]8 0~-0ct-86 ~2~.62 ~00 Date Elevation Flow 21-Jan-87 928.,]7 0 · lO-Jan-87 928.,]8 0 05-Feb-B7 928.40 0 18-Feb-B7 928.~ 0 26~mb-97 928.,]4 0 06-Mar-87 928.,]5 0 l,]-Mar-87 o~.~ :~ 7~w, -J*f 0 26-Mar-87 928.37 0 06-Apr-87 928.28 0 1.,-Apr-~7 9~8.~ 0 21-Apr-87 9~8. z0 0 27-Apr-87 928.~ 0 04-May-B7 928.22 0 !2-May-87 928.25 0 21-May-87 ~27.94 0 28-May-B7 927.97 0 07-~un-87 927.89 0 15-Jun-B7 927.68 0 DATE APRIL APRIL APRIL APRIL APRIL APRIL APRIL APRIL APRIL APRIL APRIL MAY 1 MAY MAY i MAY ~'iAY MAY ! 8 10 17 20 24 29 4 6 8 11 !8 20 22 27 29 Q,.AYS ~AY (cfs) BROWNDALE AVE. DAM 5.0 4.5 .%7 4.5 4.5 4.,9 2.8 ?. ~ 4.0 4.0 5.9 4.5 4.0 5.0 4.0 ;.0 2.5 ,/ Precipitation Summary Maple P1 ai n Mpls.-St. Paul Int' 1 Airport Wayzata Actual 30 yr. normal April 0.25* 2.35 May 1.88' 3.g3 April 0.16 2.05 May 1.88 3.20 Ap ri 1 O. og May 1.97 *Estimated by State Climatology Office, problems with recording equipment on site. LEN HARRELL Ghlef of Poli~e MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 July 8, 1987 Around Mound 5 Mile Run 4934 Crestview Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Run Com~ttee: ; Thank 7ou vet7 muc~ for the recent donation o~'~'=ie~L=o, the Mound Police Department. The money will be Used~towards sending Officer McKinley and "Rex" to defend thetr~tiOnal championship in.Florida this October. It was a pleasure working with all of you again thim year. The event was very well organized and managed.. There have-been no negative comments that I have'heard resarding the running of the race. Everything went very smoothly! Thanks for your cooperation, and your support.-.of the'police department. : ~.... .-~- SinCerelY' ' ':-""~' Chief of Police AROUND MOUND 5 MILE RUN 4934 Crestview Road Mound, MN 55364 /? OR.D~/)F ' f~' ~v~ State Bank of MOUND OFFICES AT SPRING PARK · MOUND 472.212! MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 +':Oq ;qOS&Ot,: ,. c~ 1039 NO. ,,,¢7 DOLLARS 752'"204 "" HINUTES OF THE HOUND ADVISORy .PLANNING COHHISSlON HEETING · JUNE 22, t~87 " Present. were: Chal'rman Tom Re,se'; Commissioners Vern Andersen, t4illiam'Heyer, Gaol, H!.chael, Ken Smith, Brad Sohns, t~ 11lam The1. and. Frank 14eiland; Council Representa- L tire Eljzabet.h Jansen; City'Hanager Ed Shukle; City.Planner Hark Koegler; Bullding -- Official Jan Bertrand. ' ' Also p'resent were the roi;lowing i-ntereslied persons: John Paterson, Burr and Judy Llhquist; John.Z!mdars, Judy'Zlmdars, Jeff ¥!'nt, Nick Scheuer, Greg Cote, Dennis .Stahlbus. ch, Connie Stahlbush, ~uliiJS l~ebster~ Harlin Sicheneder, Jo Sicheneder, dohn Ruud, John'Thoresen, Bob. Smith, Hike'Johnson, Vi~ky-Theobald, Paul Volk,.Bob Vanecek, Bob and Lorrie Hotvet; Pat OSNeii, Gary S..Brown, Ray Frederickson, E.lsa 14arson, Anita Hiller, Paul Brown, Bud Orn, Tom Ptacek. The Commission noted that .there were no' minutes included in the packet except for Case No. 87-6q3.and Case No. 87-631. The meeting was called to' order 'at 7:30 BOARD OF APPEALS ., 1. Case No. 87-643 Side yard setback.variance for feet of Lot 17, Skarp & Lln.dquistSs.Ravenswood;.PID # 13-117-24 ql 0062 John Peterson was present. ~ ya~lance request for 6 foot sideyard was continued from the Planning and ZonTng CommisSion meeting' of June'8;}~87. The Chairman explained Eh, pre- · "vious action by' ~he Co~mlsslon.. The applicant has. stated he...Ts changing his request from a 6 and lO'foot sideyard 'to an'8 and 8 foot sldeyard. Planning · Commigsion discussion f~]'lowed regarding the neighbors~ concern about any possible change In the'ordinance. The neighbor, John and Judy Zimdars, stated. they felt they would not support an ordinance change for a iesser ~ide yard requirement. .-- Hotion by Ken Smith to approve a 2 foot side yard variance on the east and ~est side of the lot, seconded by Frank ~ei.land stating that the hardship is to 'give the'owner reasonable..use of th~ property and is consistent with the area. The vote ~as unanimously in favor.· Planning'Commission also discussed lot widths, and lots of record dates, and compliance with setbacks'with the staff. Case No. 87-631 Variance'to ~ecognfze existing noncoqforming se{backs for 33.67 Warner Lane; Part of Lot 1, Block 12, Douglas end'.Lot 6q, ~hipple Shores Jeff Vint, new owner of the property, was present. Chalrma~ Tom Reese, discussed the last meeting and t~e reason for tabling the item. Jeff Vint ~as in attendance, to'explain the Hortgage Company's require- ~ent for over-insuring his property at the closing for the new mortgage until a variance would be granted. Ken Smith stated some of the insurance rules per- talnlng to over~insurance. Chairman' discussed previous action by the Commlssl -,'- regarding recognizing nonconform!ng uses and setbacks. He stated he fel.t the City Attorney would be forwarding an opinion regarding this matter. Geoff Hichael discussed recognizing the existing nonconforming setback as proposed, but to change the wording. Plannlng Commission Hinutes June 22~ 1 87 - Page 2 Motion by Bill"Thai to table the item, seconded by Bill Hayer. The vote was.8 for and 1.nay.. Motion carried. Ken Smith stated he felt the Com- mission.has recognized.existing nonconforming uses and setbacks in previous act.ion. PUBLIC HEARINB ON EXTERIOR STORAGE Chairman, Tom Reese,' gave background of the City 'Ordlnances.'regarding exteriOr storages improvement throughout'the .Oity, such as': streets, curb, storm sewer, etc. He introduced.City Planne~Hark Koeglen to give a presentation to the. audience On' various cities! ordinance pertalnlng to exterior storage, background of Mound"s ordinances'and the revisions' passed a year ago by Ordinance 488, ' Hark K°egler reviewed his .letter of ~eptember"gth, 1~86; in which he studied vari- ous c'ity ordinances from.cOmmunities such asTonka Bay, White Bear Lake, Shorewood, Wayzata, Chanhassen, Orono and Hinnetrista. .. He reviewed the pYesent or'di.nance and the adoption dates:of: last year. He stated that the City'Council wants clarification on certain items within the exterior storage ordinance'such as: .Defining storage versus parking, and is the ordinance· tOO restrictive? ' Planning Commission Chairman opened discussion, to the audience and asked for comments; Marry Duhachek, 19$7'Lakeside Lane, questi?ned motor homes and what is allows? Don Cox, 5139 Emerald Drive, asked the commission to define, '5vhat is storage"? Bob Smith, .3232 Gla'dstone, commented that larger and bigger boats are being purchased, 30 foot maximum'length is not long enough; no definition to length should be applied; only reference to .derelict equipment. Gary Brown, 5971Gumwood Road. He stated he would llke to have stock cars on his property eve6'if it )s.to be :arped.. He forwarded to the Commission a definition of a stock car. Planning Commission.Chairman read the definition to the-audience." Nick Scheuer.., 5019 Shoreline Boulevard, asked what the Commission's intent of the ordinance"pro¥is!ons are regarding an appeal process; does the. City have. property available..for storage? The planning Commission asked Steve Smith, in the audience, to state his intention to'limit the'ordinance. Steve stated his intention was to address the ordinance only to safety issues. The'Planner also stated that a variance 'to the provisions of the'Zoning Ordinance does apply to .exterior .storage, John Ruud, h560 Hanchester Road, stated he felt that 30 feet was too restrictive for recreation equipment:and also the front yard setback was too restrlctive. A resident from 6371. Bay Ridge. Road state~efinition for recreation vehicles and motor vehicles should be different. ~. Planning Commission Minutes June 23, 1987 - Page 3 R°xanne from 3162 Drury Lane stated that there are wood piles,'fish houses, unusual shaped lots, and economics ii the.area which require some leeway for~torage on thai pPoperties. Mound was an unique community and sh~ questioned what i~J~ee~reational definition. She was not in favor of a very restrtctive ordinance regardtng storage of equipment. I Marlin Sichene, der~ S732 Sunset Road, questioned if wood piles 'garden equipment, are permitted to be stored on his property? ,._ c_o._mpost__p_i les and Paul Volk, h840 Bedford Road~ stated that race cars should be. defined and allowed without licensing of vehlcles as they.are not driven on City streets. Ken Smith questioned race car'drivers as to why people would be calling to complaln, is it because they have-vehicles torn'apart and are 'in the process of rebuilding cars. Gary Brown said he understood'the complaints were.due to the residents considering them an eyesore. ~ John Thoresen, 5845 Fairfield Road, asked the Commission to concentrate on junk rather than recreation vehicles.or equipment. He presently has a pickup camper and a boat stored on his property, out-of-season'storage versus in-season storage. Commission should consider variances'on~corner lots, and he stated his neighbor presently has a hot air balloon, He questioned how the ordinance defined measure- ments of various dimensions. Ra¥"Frederickson, 6001..Gumwood Road, asked'why is the City concerned about recrea-~ tion storage? Shirley Gustafson, $1~2 Tuxedo 8ouievard, stated the City needs restrictlon on stor- age including recreation vehicles and uncovered equipment, weeds; it is unsightly -and dangerous to children. .~icky Theobald, 507D ~oodridge Road. She. didn't feel t'he ordinance would have.to put a limlt on length of'recreation equipment, but setbacks should be maintained. Don Cox, Emerald Drive. ~hat.iS the length of time that you can park on streets? for how.,long? The Planning Commission consensus'was they did not feel'overnight parking was 'restricted except during the winter months. The Chairman thanked all in attendance for their time and concerns. Bill Meyer asked questions of the aud.ience r.e§arding how many.ciS~want a law to govern? · ' Two in the audience raised 'their hand. Does the audience think we would be better off with..an ordinance to concentrate on junk and debris? There was no vote of the audience, but Mr. Meyer felt that the majority of people in Mound want some control with ordinance provisions regarding .recreation equipment. '- Shirle'y Gustafson stated tha:t pictures were taken and she would forward them to the Commission showing exterior storage on property that she felt was offensive and asked whether or not there were any excavation rules for landscaping yards? Oennls Stahlbusch, 4943 Monmouth Road, questioned the Commission on how ordinances' are adopted. Bill Thal explained the structure of the Planning Commission as an advisory body and. the structure of the City Council. Geoff Michael felt that the Mayor should comment as a private citizen at the Plannlng Commission meeting and Plannlng Commlssion Hinutes 'June 23, 1 87 - Page not as representing his office as Mayor. The-Planning Commission adjourned for ten minutes after closing the public hearing. The Planning Commisslon opened discUssion for the membership. Ken Smith discussed separating the Ordinances on debris.versus a'storage ordinance; We need a clarifi- cation of measurement of equipment, .and'a'property owner should be only able to store a 30'foot boat. Vern Anderson introduced the comments from Brad SohnS re- garding the present'ordinanceand some ideas he had on the handout. Brad asked if the Commission .would want. copies of his comments and they stated they did. Geoff Hichael .stated that the.length.measurement should be defined. Bill Heye~ discussed whether tarping boats, should be required.as deflning some perimeter of storage or blocking of boats.versus, trailering a boat on your yard. Frank Weiland commented that he feels a person:should 1|mit height, number o~ vehicles, as it could block light,' ventilation and view from a persons property; He also. mentioned whether or not fire equipment' could be brought unto a property and what possibly. would constitute a fire hazard. Liz. Jensen stated that'agarage or'a bb[ldlng to put storage into may have lesser restrictions tha~: the placement of recreation equipment. What is the setback of accessory building? Chairman Reese stated that the neighbors are reluctant to' complain. He feels that persons attending a public hearing .tend to have many more negative comments than the general public. We need rational ordinances to keep'people.from getting abused. H'r. Andersen said.people that he had talked to did not want limitations..He ques-- tioned' approximately 20 to 30 people. · ........... Ken Smith and Tom Reese, both.made comment that if.peOpl~ are agalns't.somethin~ .than they will attend hearings. Bill Meyer stated'.that when you look at theSame area. you don't notice what may be objectionable to someone else. .When.you start traveling to an unfamiliar area, than you notice the'storage. 'Mr. Sohns said he heard people, say, if you have room, you can store equipment on your propertyt' ' They were concerned about overcrowdl'ng; Ken Smith commented that if restrictions are made in the ordinance, it cleans up the neighborhood area, such .as junk all over, storing of boatg, restoring of cars. Hr. Andersen asked'if there was a group represented 'in the City that would come out with a statement to oppose or.support the ordinance. Hr. Weiland said he 'had talked to people who were against 'height and large sized recreation equipment. would Tom Reese/like; the Commission to give the staff direction on the censensus of the Commission: 1. Define recreation vehlcles, recreation equipment:. (motor vehicles) 2. Race cars should be addressed in the ordinance. 3. Defining how a measurement of length should apply to r'ecreational equipment. h. Possibly define recreational vehicle unit, such as 2 snowmobiles on one trailer as one recreational unit. Planning Commission Hinutes June 23, 1987 - Page 5 $. Height limitations. Include trailers, but possibly exclude snowmobiles from the defi.nitlon of recreation equipment. Broaden the definition of recreation.equipment to posslbly include fish house, exclude sno~obIles on trailers, remove length restriction, but're-instate sideyard and 'rear yard setbacks, keep front'yard setback. Six foot sldeyard or rear yard was discussed as a limitation. Exceptions for corner lots should apply', front yard setbacks could be from.the driving surface and/or sidewalk at 20 feet throughout the City. 9. Exclude wood piles. 10. Define storage, eliminate parking altogether as anything parked on the property would be considered storage, and posslbly look at active and inactive storage definition. 11. 12. Limit the area of a property covered by storage to a percentage of the lot. Residential areas or uses could be defined as there are residential properties In commercially zoned areas. The Planner suggested bringing these suggestions, back ~o the next meeting as the time is limited for respona., to the City Council. The City Planner will get materi~ to the Commission regarding new Supreme Court decision pertaining to Zoning as requested by Bill Thal. Hotlon by Tom Reese, seconded by Bill Thal to adjourn the meeting at 10:30 P.H. The vote was unanimously in favor; meeting was adjourned. Attest: