The URL can be used to link to this page

1987-09-22CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA AGENDA HOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 7:30.P.H.z TUESDAY, SEP___TEMBER 22z 1987 COUNCIL CHAMBERS Pledge of Allegiance Approve the Minutes of the September 8, 1987, Regular Meeting and the SeRtember 15, 1987, Special Meeting and September 16, 1987, Special Meeting PUBLIC HEARING: Deli'nquent Utility Bills Pg. 2623-2635 Pg. 2636 PUBLIC HEARING: Central Business District Parking Assessment - Levy #10629 Pg. 2637-2642 PUBLIC HEARING: B. C. D. Unpaid Tree Removal Assessment - Levy #10625 Pg. 2643-2648 Delinquent Utility Bills Assessment - Levy #10628 Pg. 2649-2650 Unpaid Lot Clean-Up Assessment - Levy #10627 Pg.' 2651-2652 Unpaid Boarding Up of House Assessment - Levy #10626 Pg. 2'653-2654 Resolutions Levying Deferred & Supplemental Assessments Upon Waive.r of Formalities: Directing Preparation of Abstract; & Directing Certification to the County Auditor A. Levy #10630 B. Levy #10631 C. Levy #10632 D. Levy #10633 E. Levy #10634 Pg. 2655-2656 Pg. 2657-2658 Pg. 2759-2660 Pg. 2661-2662 Pg. 2663-2664 BID AWARD: Snow Removal from Parking Lots in the Central Business District for 1987-88 Pg. 2665-2666 ResolUtion Approving a One-Third Mill Levy for the Purpose of Defraying the Cost of Operation, Pursuant to the Provisions of MSA 462.411 thru 462.705, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound for the Year 1988 Pg. 2667-2669 Resolutions Cancelling Levies A. G.O. Bonds of 1976 - $2,059.71 Pg. 2670 Page 2620 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. B. G.O. Bonds of 1979 - $19,083.00 C. G.O. Bonds of 1980 - $5,870.00 D. G.O. Bonds of 1978 - $16,540.00 E. G.O. Bonds of 1982 - $16,500.00 F. Fire Equipment Certificates of 1984 - $11,551.50 G. Water Revenue Bonds of 1976 - $20,597.06 Request to do Cemetery Planting - Dick Olexa Set Date for Public Hearing on Proposed Vacation of Portion of Phelps Road on the East Side of Tuxedo Blvd. Abutting Lots 13 & 14, Block 20, Whipple (3314 Tuxedo Blvd.) Pg. 2671 Pg. 2672 Pg. 2673 Pg. 2674 Pg. 2675 Pg. 2676 Pg. 2677-2679 Suggested Bate: October 27, 1987 Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present Pg. 2680-2681 Preliminary Discussion: CASE {8/-662: ~& Carol cane, Lot 9, Block 2, Mound Terrace Request Front & Side Yard Variance CASE ~87-663: Lost Lake Proposal Pg. 2682-2684 Schuffenhauer, 6350 Rambler Bria.._..____En Johnson, 4945 Glen Elyn Road, Parts of Lots 17 & 18, ShadYwood Point, all in Block 24 Pg. 2685-2692 Request: Setback Variance for Existing Structure CASE ~87-664: Applicant i.~_j.G_h_o.r_~L-Rucinski and Owner .~_Robert Huffman, 5124 Tuxedo Blvd., Lot 14, Whipple Shores Pg. 2693-2703 Request: Structural Repairs to a Nonconforming Structure CASE 187-665: Roland McAlliste~r, 1649 Bluebird Lane, Lots 1-thru ~, Block 6, Dreamwood Request: Front Yard Setback & Lakeshore Setback Variance CASE /87-667: Thomas Maxwell, 3114 Island View Drive, Lot 59, Phelp's Island Park First Addition Pg. 2704-2710 Pg. 2711-2723 Request: Variance to Recognize an Existing Nonconforming Side Yard Setback Pg. 2724-2729 Page 2621 19. CASE #87-668: 20. 21. 22. Kent & Leslie Westberg, 1708 Avocet Lane (6260 Deerwood Drive), Lot 4, Block 3, Woodcrest of Mound 3rd Addition Request: Variance to Temporarily Place a Travel Trailer at 6260 Deerwood Drive Pg. 2730-2733 Payment of Bills Pg. 2734-2741 Designation of Voting and Alternate Voting Delegates - National League of Cities Annual Congress of Cities, December 12-16, 1987 - Las Vegas, Nevada Pg. 2742-2751 INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A® August 1987 Month~ly Financial Report as Prepared by John Norman, Finance Director Minutes of Park Commission Meeting September 10 Copy of letter dated September 11, 1987, from LMCD to Minnetonka Bass Club regarding renewal application for bass fishing tournament on June 4, 1988. Club will have to apply to the City of Mound prior to above date, pursuant to item #5 on enclosed letter. REMINDER FOR PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY MEETINGS: Pg. 2752-2753 Pg. 2754-2756 Pg.' 2757-2759 September 23 - 12:00 Noon - Senior Center 7:45 P.M. - Lions Club at Minnetonka Mist September 24 - 12:00 Noon - Rotary - Lafayette Club 7:30 P.M. City Hall September 30 - Election Canvassing Board Meeting 7:30 P.M. City Hall REMINDER: NLC/ICMA Council-Manager Relations Seminar Monday, September 28, 1987 Hyatt Regency Hotel 1300 Nicollet Mall 8:00 A.M. - 4:30 P.M. Pg. 2760 Page 2622 151 September 8, 1987 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 8, 1987 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, September 8, 1987, at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Don Abel, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, City Attorney Jim Larson, City Engineer John Cameron, City Planner Mark Koegler, Police Chief Len Harrell, Finance Director John Norman and the following interested citizens: Ron & Randie Cook, Bud Gustner, Bill & Pauline Thorson, Ton &.Glenda Purdes, Mike Barlow, Ralph & Clara Paz, Eric Berglund, Kurt Berglund, Glenn Melena, Brad Sohns, Vern Anderson, Art Ridgway, Gordon Swenson, Bernie Lister, Dennis Wegleitner, Kathy Bailey, Bill Peglow, June & Dudley Fitz, Bud Stannard, Gary Brown, Craig Watson, Brad Landsman. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in atten- dance. · . The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. MiNUTEs Mayor Smith asked that the vote on Case ~87-661 be corrected to read "...3 in favor with Councilmember Jensen voting nay...", in the August 25th minutes. MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jensen to approve the minutes of the August 25, 1987, Regular Meeting, as amended, and the August 2g, 1987, Special Meeting, as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ORAL REPORT FROM THE MAYOR'S ORU& ~ASK FORCE As pabt of the Mound Task Force on Chemical Abuse, June Fitz delivered an oral report covering the following: 1. General statement of the chemical abuse problem. A. Drugs and teens B. Family issues C. Law enforcement D. Lack of prevention programs ® Considerations of the cost of chemical abuse in the Community of Mound. Chemical abuse has cost our community in the following: 152 September 8, 1987 Police Department Fami 1 ies Community Edu cati on Health care costs Suggested solutions: Chemical Abuse A. Community B. Churches and service organizations C. School s D. City Council They'will be submitting a written report to the Council in about 10 days. The Council .thanked the following persons who were on the Task Force for all' the 'time and energy they spent studying the issues: June Fitz, Mike Barlow, Kathy Bailey, Len Harrell, Flossy Warner and Dr. Bill Peglow. PUBLIC HEARING: PR'DPOSED REVISION TO SECTION 23.301 {9Z) AND SEC- TION 23.702 RELATING TO EXTERIOR STORAGE The City Planner reviewed the proposed revisions to the ext'erior storage ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission. The Mayor opened the public hearing. The following persons spoke regarding exterior storage. 1. Bud Stannard, 2135 Overland Lane 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Bud Gustner, 5959 Gumwood ROad Ron Cook, 5977 Gumwood Road Gary Brown, 5971 Gumwood Road Mike Barlow, 2072 Commerce Blvd. John Thorson, 5845 Fairfield Road Craig Watson, 4610 Tuxedo Blvd. Brad Landsman, 2212 Fairvi'ew Lane The following comments were made: 1.' A petition was submitted by Bud Gustner from 11 resi- dents of Gumwood Road which read as follows: "We the undersigned people of Gumwood Road, Mound, MN. want to know if the' Council would tell us what they consider a race caF' and what we consider as junk starting to clut- ter up our neighborhood". Mr. Gustner and Mr. Cook spoke against allowing race cars as exterior storage. 2. Mr. Bud Stannard asked for a definition of what was 153 September 8, 1987 considered front yard and what was considered back yard of a lakeshore lot. The Planner stated the lakeshore is considered the back yard. Gary Brown stated he thought race cars should be al- lowed if they are covered with a tarp. Mike Barlow agreed. John Thorson stated he has a corner lot and the set- backs required in the proposed ordinance' would be"a hardship for him. Brad Landsman stated he could not comply with the set- back requirements. A resident at 2727 Tyrone stated i-f people cannot meet the setbacks, they should find another place to store recreational vehicles. 7. Craig Watson asked if the proposed ordinance would ef- fect the storage of firewood. The Planner stated no. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The"Council discussed the setback requirements in the proposed amendment· . HOTION made by Smith, seconded by Johnson to delete ga. from the proposed ordi.nance and insert the following: 2a. Front Yard - Front yard parking prohibited if over the curb line or in such a manner as to block or impede the safe flow of traffic on the abutting roadway. The vote was 3 in favor with Jensen and Jessen voting nay. Motion carried. The Council then discussed' whether they should allow race vehicles to be allowed as outside ~torage. The Building Official stated that if they are not included in this ordinance, they would'have to be enclosed in a building or fenced so as not to be seen by the general public. HOTION' made by Jessen, seconded by Abel to delete any reference to race vehicles from the proposed ordinance. This includes the definition {89A}, the reference to race vehicles in definition {g2B), and number 5 under Section 23.702. The vote was 3 in favor with Johnson and Smith voting nay. Motion carried· Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following: 154 September 8, 19.87 ORDINANCE 18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE DEFINITION SECTION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ANENDING sEcTION 23.702 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO EXTERIOR STORAGE AS AMENDED ABOVE The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED 1988 BUDGET The City Manager hilghlighted ~he proposed 1988 General Fund Budget. The Finance Director highlighted the proposed 1988 En- terprise Funds. MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Smith to set September 15th, 16th and if needed the 21st at 7:00 P.M. as dates to meet with the Oepartment Heads regarding the 1288 Budget. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. REQUEST TO PURCHASE ALL OR PART OF LOTS 5 & 21~ ~ERNARD LISTER~ 2721 TYRONE LANE BLOCK 28. SETON - The-' City Clerk explained that the property Mr. Lister wishes to purchase is tax forfeit property that has been taken by the. City for park land. It is adjacent "to Tyrone Park. The Park Commisr sion did not make a recommendation on this item, but the consen- sus was that they did not wish to give up the park land. Mr. Lister was present and stated he would like to acquire enough land to allow another building site on his property. At the present time he does not have enough street frontage for that. The Council discussed the proposal. MOTION made by jessen,' seconded by Johnson to deny the request of Mr. Bernard Lister to release Lots 5 and 21, BlOck 28, Seton. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION RESCI. NDING RESOLUTION t87-127 RELATING TO THE REAL- LOCAT¥~--~-~ HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS Abel moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 187-154 RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION t87-127 RELATING TO THE REALLOCATION OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT 155 September 8. 1987 There were no comments or suggestions from the citizens present. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT APPOINTMENTS The City Manager explained that there are 3 qualified persons that Orono has decided to support for the two open positions. They are Da.vid Cochran, Norman Paurus and Robert Brown. Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #87-155 RESOLUTION ENDORSING CANDIDATES FOR THE #INNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD VACANCY The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. TREE REMOVAL LICENSE HOTION made by Abel, seconded by Johnson to authorize' the issuance of a Tree Removal License to: All-Ways Outdoor Service 7712 County Rd. 6 Maple Plain, MN. 55359 The vote was unanimously in favor. Hotion carried. RESOLUTION REGARDING CASE t87-641 - SPLITTING UP OF LOTS - NORMAN BERGLUND The City Engineer explained the request and submitted his proposed resolution. The Council asked if this item had been before the Planning Commission. The answer was no. MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Smith to refer this item to the Planning Commission for the review and recommendations. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PAYHENT OF BILLS MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to authorize the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list, in the amount of $122,001.28, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES IN MEETING SCHEDULE FOR PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY ISSUE - Meeting with the Fire Department on September 14 will be 156 September 8, 1987 at 8:00 P.M. rather than 7:30 P.M. You will still go to the Planning Commission Meeting after meeting with the Fire Dept. There will be a meeting with the Rotary at 12:00 Noon on September 24th at the Lafayette Club. August 1987 Monthly Reports from Department Heads. Ind. School Dist. #277 Minutes from July 13, 1987 and August 10, 1987. Report from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on Lake Level, Flow and Precipitation for July 1987. Copy of letter and copy of check for $100 to the Mound Police Department from Jayne Galles, 1566 Eagle Lane. REMINDER FOR PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY MEETINBS: September g - 7:30 P.M. City Hall September 14 - 8:00 P.M. Fire Dept. at Fire Station Planning Commission at City Hall fol- lowing Fire Dept, Meeting September 23 - 12:00 Noon - Senior Center 7:45 P.M. - Lions Club at Minnetonka Mist September 24 - 12:00 Noon - Rotary - Lafayette Club 7:30 P.M. City Hall REMINDER: NLC/ICMA Council-Manager Relations Seminar Monday, September 28, 1987 Hyatt Regency' Hotel 1300 Nicollet Mall 8:00 A.M. - 4:30 P.M. Copy of memo from John Norman, Finance DirectOr regarding federal and state reimbursement for damage to public pr%perty caused by the July 23rd storm. We will receive reimbursement for 90% of the costs associated with the public damage. John Norman, Len Harrell, Geno Hoff, Greg Skinner, Jim Fackler and Don Bryce deserve a great deal of credit for compiling the data necessary in a very short period of time. They kept excellent records and were able to organize it quickly for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It was a job well done. 157 September 8, 1987 NOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jensen to adjourn at 10:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk BILLS-' ....... SEPTEMBER 8, 1987 Batch 874083 Batch 874084 Computer run dated 9/3/87 Computer run dated 9/4/87 65,416.22 56,585.06 Total Bills 122,001.28 158 September 15, 1987 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - SPECIAL BUDGET HEARING The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session to go over the proposed 1988 Budget on Tuesday, September 15, 1987, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Liz Jen- sen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Councilmember Abel arrived' late and was excused. Also present Were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, Finance Director John Norman, Fire Chief Don Bryce, Police Chief Len Harrell, Street Superin- tendent Geno Hoff, Sewer & Water Superintendent Greg Skinner, Park Director Jim Fackler and the following interested citizens: Harold Meeker, Nancy Clough, Pat & Paul Meisel, Scott Tinklin- berg, Dan Sinner, Ron Purdes, and Gill Stammer. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in atten- dance. The City Manager reviewed a change in t~e Commons Dock fund that'was made since the Budget was sent out. This change af- fected, a number of pages and revised pages were given out. The Mound City DaYs Committee Chairperson, Nancy Clough, reported on the 1987 revenues and expenses of the celebration. She also reported on the awards that were received. She then asked that the Council include in their budget $3500 for the fireworks for the 1988 Mound City Days if the committee could not meet that figure with their revenues. MOTION made by Smith to appropriate $3500 of the 1988 Budget to the 1988 Mound City Days Committee for fireworks. The motion died for lack of a second. The Council discussed the request and stated they would take this into consideration after reviewing the proposed 1988 Budget. The CounFil then .reviewed the following proposed budgets and asked various questions of the Department Heads. COMMONS DOCK FUND Residents Ron Purdes, Gill Stammer and Dan Sinner were present to encourage the Council to approve the dredging of the Black Lake Channel by Shannon Road. The City Council discussed the Park Commission's recommendation to increase the Commons Docks Fees in 1988 to the amounts on Page 159 September 15, 1987 65 of the proposed Budget. Councilmember Johnson stated he felt the fees should be raised higher than are proposed. Smith moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION f87-156 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE COMNONS DOCKS FEE INCREASE FOR 1988 AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PARK COHNISSION The vote was 3 in favor with Councilmember Johnson voting nay. Motion Carried. Councilmember Abel was absent and excused. The Council then reviewed, the following funds with the Department Heads. Pension Fund Cemetery Fund Fire Dept. Municipal Building Fund Contingency Fund Recreation ~ Park Dept. Councilmember Abel arrived. City Property & Buildings Shop & Stores Streets Civil Defense Planning & Inspection WATER FUND Finance Director, John Norman, went over the cash balance with the Council and explained that' he is recommending a'water rate increase for 1988 because of the detlining cash balance. Also because there will be a big expenditure in 1988 for the watermain replacement on County Road 15 and for outstanding debt obliga- tions. The recommendation is to go from $.88/1000 gallons to $1.00/1000 ga]lons~ SEWER FUND Finance Director, John Norman, reviewed th'e cash balance in the Sewer Fund and stated that the high balance in this account is from the credits the MWCC pays to the City for the sewer plant, but that will end in the 1990's. He did not recommend an in- crease in the sewer rates. 160 September 15, 1987 MOTION made by Abel,.seconded by Jensen to adjourn at 10:15 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward j'. Shukle, Jr. City Manager Pran Clark, CMC, City Clerk 160 September 16, 1987 HINUTES - HOUND CITY COUNCIL - SPECIAL BUDGET HEARING The City Council of Mound, Hennepin COunty, Minnesota, met in special session to go~ over the proposed 1988 Budget on Tuesday, September 16, 1987, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Don Abel,. Liz Jensen, Phyllis jessen and Skip johnson. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, Finance Director john Norman, Fire Chief Don Bryce, Police Chief Len Harrell, Street Superintendent Geno Hoff, Sewer & Water Su- perintendent Greg Skinn.er, Park Director jim Fackler, Liquor Store Manager joel Krumm and the following inte.rested citizens: Pat & Paul Meisel, Dan Sinner, Ron Purdes, MaWy Alexander, June Fitz, Dr'. Bill Peglow. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in atten- dance. He then recapped the meeting from September 15th for Councilmember Abel who was absent for part of that meeting. The Council then reviewed the following proposed budgets and asked.various questions of the Department Heads. City Council City Manager'/Clerk Elections Assessing Finance Computer Legal Cable T.V. Recycling Police Liquor Fund HOUND CITY DAYS The Council reviewed this request. HOTION m~de by Abel, seconded by Smith to allocate $3,500 for fireworks for the 1988 Mound City Days celebration. Honey to be taken from the General Fund reserves. The vote was I in favor with Abel, jensen, Jessen and Johnson voting nay. Hotion failed. The Council again discussed the request. 161 September l§, 1987 HOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Johnson to allocate up to $3,500 if needed for fireworks for. the 1988 Hound City Oays celebration. Honey to be taken from the General Fund reserves. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The Council then reviewed the Liquor Fund. Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 187-157 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1988 GENERAL FUND... BUDGET IN THE AI~OUNT OF $2,128,550; SETTING THE LEVY AT $1,335,977; AND APPROVING THE OVERALL BUDGET FOR 1988 The vote was unanimously in favor. MotiOn carried. WATER RATE INCREASE The Council reviewed the proposed water r~te increase that was recommended at the previous meeting. Johnson moved and Jensen seconded'the following resolution: RESOLUTION ~87-158 RESOLUTION INCREASING WATER RATES, EF- FECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1988 The vote was 4 in favor with Mayor Smith voting nay. carried. Motion HOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to adjourn at 10:00 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, C~ty CLerk 22 232 2196 72 22 232 2¢70'81 22 238 4875 12 22 238 4879 31 22 238 4882 71 22 238 4941 14 22 238 5005 43 22 244 5019 31 22 247 2130 41 22 259 5460 75 22 259 6070 31 22 262 2872 02 22 262 3037 91 22 268 5872 44 22 280 5910 71 22 286 5915 32 22 286 5971 61 22 286 6056 51 22 298 2965 62 22 304 2939 71 22 310 2605 12 22 310 2676 21 22 310 5710 91 22 316 2620 71 22 343 2066 73 22 346 5667 21 22 367 5273 51 22 373 5063 81 22 388 5061 O1 Delinquent Water and Sewer $125.39 5O.OO 133.29 110.72 95.64 72.87 147.33 134.34 89.89 89.30 162.39 73.93 145.05 91.32 97 .O4 172.91 75.71 104.17 87.62 145.82 113.76 89.33 74.94 241.00 101.68 109.85 127.38 88.14 72.17 $3222.98 9-17-87 2.2 232 2~96 72 22 238 4875 12 22 238 4879 31 22 238 4882 71 22 238 4941 14 22 238 5005 43 22 244 5019 31 22 247 2130 41 22 259 5460 75 22 259 6070 31 22 262 2872 02 22 262 3037 91 22 268 58?2 44 22 280 5910 71 22 286 5915 32 22 268 5971 61 22 286 6056 51 22 298 2965 62 22 304 29B9 12 ~ 310 2605 i2 22 310 2676 21 22 310 2710 91~ 22 316 2620 71 22 343 2066 73 22 346 5667 21 22 367 5273 51 22 373 5063 81 22 388 5061 O1 Ken Meyer ~ay.~oopeT Anthony Brinatte Burt Linquist Dan Solberg Mark Seneja F Mittelsteadt Ron Hayes Sharon Webb Jeff Soliday Perry Ames Gary Swager John Richards S. Weldon Michael Simar Tim Bell C. Poikonen Joetta Roehl Ron Anderson Thomas Helget Peter ~aJvln Robert Labresh Geo Hudinsky Russ Witham Judith Marske Robert Brown Stanns & Sorens Colon Kelly R. Giese Delinquent Water and Sewer $125~,~~ 2196 Fairview Lane 133.29 H~ 72.87 ~/.~ 73.93 97.04 172.91 -75.71- 104.17 87.62 11~.76 89.33 74.94 241.00 109.85 127.38 4875 Edgewater Drive 4879 Edgewater Dr 4882 Edgewater Drive 4941Edgewater Dr. 5005 Edgewater Dr. 5019 Rosedale Road 2130 Hickory Lane 5460 Bartlett Blvd. 6070 Bartlett Blvd. * 2872 Highland Blvd. 3037 Highland Blvd. 5872 Glenwood Road 5910 Idlewood Road * 5915 Hawthorne Road 5971 Hawthorne Road 6056 Hawthorne Road 2965 Oaklawn Lane 2939 Dickens Lane 2676 Westedge Blvd. 2710 Westedge Blvd. 2620 Halstead Lane 2066 Commerce Blvd. 5667 Bush Road 5273 Eden Road 6063 Woodridge Road 72.17 -5061 Avon Drive $3222.98 ~ /~'~ 7, ~(~ *Contract ~-22-87 Paid Paid Paid Paid 100. O0 Pal d Paid Paid Pal d Paid Paid Paid CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE - 1987 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota will meet in the Council Cham- . bers at 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 P.M. on September 22, 1987, to hear, consider and pass on all written and oral objections, if any, to the proposed assessment. The general nature of the im- provements to be assessed are as follows: CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PARKING MAINTENANCE - 1987 - Area within the~following boundaries proposed to be assessed: Belmont Lane on the East North of Lynwood Boulevard to Tonkawood Road 700 feet West of Commerce Boulevard 700 feet South of Shoreline Boulevard ~otal Cost to be Assessed $ 29,034.42 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.011 to 429.110, al.1 property lying within the above described limits and benefiting therefrom is proposed to be assessed. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. Writ- ten or oral objections will be considered at the hearing, but the Council may consider any objections to the amount of the proposed individual assessments at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the ap- peal upon .the Mayor or City Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service uPon the Mayor or City Clerk. .No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment as to a specific parcel of land may be made unless the owner has either filed a signed written objection to that assessment with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented the written objection to the presiding officer at the hearing. The City Council has adopted, pursuant to the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes 435.193 to 435.195, a resolution (#77-420) containing standards and guidelines for deferring the assessments for senior citizens for whom it would be a hardship to make~ the payments on homestead property. The standards and guidelines are on file with the City Clerk for your inspection. Francene C. C-lark, CMC, City Publish in The Laker September 7, 1987 In addition to the above, you are hereby given notice of the fol- lowing information pursuant to Minnesota Statute: 1. The amount to be specially assessed against the particular parcel of land belo~ is $ . Leg.al DeSCription of Property: The .owner of .'the property s~pecially assessed has the right to prepay the entire assessment and the person to whom the prepayment must be made is the City Treasurer of the City of Mound. Partial p~epayment of the assessment has not been authorized by ordinance. The owner Of any property so assessed may, within thirty (30) days after adoption of the assessment, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel to the City of Mound without interest. If payment, is made after thirty (30) days, but prior to November 15, 1987, interest will be charged to December 31, 1987. After November 15, following the date of assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the first year's tax list and col- lected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of the assessment through December 31 of the following year and all payments thereafter shall be in accordance with the provi- sions of M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3. The rate of interest to be accrued if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period is eight per cent (8~). Francene C. Clark, C)IC, City Clerk September ZZ, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION ADOPTING 1987 CBD PARKING HAINTENANCE~ ASSESSllENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $~ TO BE CERTIFIEO TO TIlE COUNTY. AUDITOR AT 8% INTEREST LEVY ~105Z9 W~EREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: 1987 CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE FROM JULY 1, 1986 TO JUNE 30, 1987 MOUND: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Such proposed special assessment as amended, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein~included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. e Such assessments shall be' payable in equal annual installments as follows: IMPROVEMENT YEARS RATE LEVY ~ 1987 CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE I 8% 10629 e The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time on or before October 30, 1987, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. Af{er November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of the assessment through December 31 of the following year. ® The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. September 22, 1987 The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted i~n the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Property Identification 13'117-24 BB 0066 14-117-24 ~u4 0001 14-,117-24 ;434 0002 14-117-24 44 0003 14-117-24 ;434 0004 14-117-24z~4 0006 .13-117-24 33 0004 13-117-24 33 0005 13-117-24 33 0006 13-117-24 33 0007 13-117-24 33 0008 13~!17-24 33 0011 13-117-24 33 0014' 13-117-24 33 0015 13-117-24 33 0016 13-117-24 33 0017 14-117-24 44 0046 13-117-24 33 0064 13-117-24 33 0073 7-24 44 0036 '-24 44 00:5'?'" 14-117-24 44 0038 14-,117-24 44 0039 -14-117-24 440041 14-117-24 44 0042 13-117-24 33 0047 13-117-24 33 0049 13-117-24 33 0050 13-117-24 33 0053 13-117-24 33 0054 13-117-24 33 0001 13-117-24 33 0027 13-117-24 33 0058. 13-117-24 33 0059' 13~117-24 33 0060 13-117-24 33 0061 , 13-117-24 33 0062 13-117~24 33 0063 TOTAL 1987 CBD ASSESSM~ ROLL AMOUNT CREDIT FOR LAND I_F~SED TO CITY 626.8O 554.74 164646.47 4155.66 -520.30 1197.66 110.89 -1100.00 494.86 2047.2.3 364.90 711.92 10~.66 1122.61 291.04 579.13 -616.00 529.45 596.59 -177.87 132.z10 1834.2? -1995.40- 2106.46 1686.06., 626.80 375.71 1146.75 725.46 1173.93 -15.40 431.75 -248.16 697.44 603.32 33.90 88.32 °o 2237.25 27503.00 -4673.13 CREDIT APPLIED -989.11 989.11 $ TO BE ASSESSED 626.8O 554.7z~ 16;46.47 2646.25 1197,66 .00 494.86 20q7.23 364.~ 711 .g~ lOq.6 1122.~' 291, 418; 132. 21 06 .: 1686,~: 626 .';~ 375 11~6.7~ 725.~ 1158.. 183 .~ 6O3 J2 33 88. 22_37 29034.~ ~ 000000000000000000 ~ o~ooooooooo~ooo8ooo~o~ooooo ,CD 8 o ,_,1 o oo o o~o~ooo8o8ooo88888888888~ o88oo8o88° CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS: UNPAID TREE REMOVAL CHARGES; UNPAID BOARDING UP HOME CHARGES; UNPAID CLEAN-UP CHARGES;. UNPAID WATER AND SEWER BILLS TO WHOM~IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 P.M. on September 22, 1987, to hear, con- sider and pass on all written and oral .objections, if any, to the proposed assessment on the following parcels of land for: UNPAID TREE REMOVAL CHARGES: AMOUNT TO BE SPREAD OVER 5 YEARS Property Identification ~ 24-117-24 41 0104 $ 375.00 UNPAID BOARDING UP HOUSE 'CHARGES: AMOUNT TO BE SPREAD OVE'R I YEAR Property Identification ~19-117-23 34 0036 $ 300.00 UNPAID CLEAN-UP CHARGES: AMOUNT TO BE SPREAD OVER I YEAR Property Identification ~13-117-24 41 0051 $ 50.00 UNPAID WATER AND SEWER BILLS: ~ro~_~rtz__~I~entification 1'3~117-24 13 0032 13-117-24 12 0019 14-117r24 41 0034 14~1>7-24.42 0122 14~117~24 34 0041 13,117r24 44 0081 23-117-24 13 0032 23~117~24 42 0037 23-117-24 33 0011 23-117-24 34 0021 24-117-24 11 0012 19-117-23 24 0053 19-117-23 34 0036 24-117-24 44 0081 24-117-24 44 0003 24-117-24 41 0012 Amount 327.37 161.32 95.71 331.26 156.68 179.52 455.25 133.12 168.28 266.43 124.82 145.09 66.12 122.63 163.35 208.31 216.38 24=117-24 41 0083 24~117-24 44 0164 25-117=24 11 0131 30-117-23 22 0016 30~117-23 22 0029 30~117~23 22 0020 25-117-24 21 0077 13-117-24 21 0030 205.63 170.25 150.60 126.87 130.01 136.04 180.65 200.65 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.011 to 429.110, all property lying within the above described limits and benefiting there- from is proposed to be assessed. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. Written or oral ob= jections will be considered at the hearing, but the Council may con= sider any' objections to the amount of the proposed individual assess- ments at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Min- nesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the. assessment .and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment as to a specific par- cel of land may be made unless the owner has either filed a signed written objection to that assessment with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented the written objection to the presiding of- ficer at the hearing. The City Council has adopted, pursuant to the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes 435.193 to 435.195, a resolution (#77-420) contain- ing standards and guidelines for deferring the assessments for senior citizens for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments on homestead property. The standards and guidelines are on file with the City Clerk for your inspection. Francene C. Clark, CMC, City Clerk Publish in The Laker September 7, 1987 In addition to the above, you are hereby given notice of the following information pursuant to Minnesota Statute: The amount to be specially assessed against the particular parcel of land below is $ . Legal Description of Property: The owner of the property specially assessed has the right to prepay the entire assessment and the person to whom the prepay- ment must be made is the City Treasurer of the City of Mound. Partial prepayment of the assessment has not been authorized by ordinance. ~ The owner of any property so assessed may, within thirty (30) days .after adoption of.the assessment, pay the whole'of the assessment against any parcel'to the City of Mound without inter- est. If payment is made after, thirty (30) days, but prior to November 15, 1987, interest will be charged to December 31, 1987. After November 15, following the date of assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the first year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of the assessment through December 31 of the fol- lowing year and all payments thereafter shall be in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3. The rate of interest to be accrued if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period is eight per cent (8%). Francene C. Clark, CMC, City Clerk September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID TREE REMOVAL ASSESSllENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT 0F.$375.00 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8~ INTEREST LEVY d10625 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: UNPAID TREE REMOVAL CHARGES NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOUND: Such proposed special assessment as amended; copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. ~ ® PID d Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments as follows: INT. IHPROVEHENT AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY ~ 24-117-24 41 0104 TREE REMOVAL CHARGES $375.00 5 8% 10625 The owner of any property so ass.essed may, at any time on or before October 30, 1987, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax · list.and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of the assessment through December 31 of the following year. me The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. CITY OF MOUND 75 YEARS 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 September 22, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: City Manager Park Director Levy #10625, Page 2646 of the Council Packet On July 7, 1986, a complaint from Mr. Jim McGee was received on a dead tree. It was inspected on July 7th or 8th. When inspected, Mr. M~Gee was present. other corner of his lot in the rear. found the tree to be on the lot line. We found the lot marker at the We measured from that marker and Mr. McGee was witness to this. This tree also is part of a retaining wall. About 5 feet of the trunk of the tree is used in conjunction with a block wall holding back a neighbor's yard, Mr. Orrin Fredrickson. I explained to Mr. McGee that my findings were that the cost of the tree removal should be shared between the two private property owners, letter dated July 8, 1986. A notice for removal was sent July 8, 1986 to both property owners. Mr. Fr~drickson contacted me and agreed to pay his share of the tree removal, $375.00 out of $750.00. Mr. McGee did not respond. A second notice was sent on July 30, 1986 and again he did not respond. Both certified letters were returned to the City. Mr. McGee was then notified by posting the tree and a letter to his front door. Again, he did not respond and the tree was removed on October 9, 1986. September 22, 1987 The following Councilmen~ers voted in the a~=firmative; The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO, 87- RESOLUTION ADOPTING DELINQUENT WATER & SEWER ASSESSRENT ROLL IN THE AHOUNT OF $ TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY. AUDITOR AT 8% INTEREST LEVY ~10628 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upo~ all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: HOUND: DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY l}lE CITY COUNCIL OF ~liE CXT~ OF e PID ~ Such proposed special assessment as amended~ copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments as fol 1 ows: INT. IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY ~ 13-117-24 13 0032 13-117-24 12 0019 14-117-24 41 0034 14-117-24 42 0122 14-117-24 34 0041 13-117-24 44 0081 23-117-24 13 0032 23-117-24 42 0037 ~ . ^11 23-117-24.34 0021 24-117-24'11 0012 19-117-23 24 0053 19~117-23 34 0036 24-117-24 44 0081 24-117-24 44 0003 24-117-24 41 0012 24-117-24 41 0083 24-117-24 44 0164 25-117-24 11 0131 30-117-23 22 0016 30-117-23 22 0029 Del. Water & Sewer Del. Water & Sewer Del. Water & Sewer Del. Water & Sewer Del. Water & Sewer Del. Water & Sewer Del. Water & Sewer 327.37 I 8% 10628 161.32 I 8% 10628 95.71 i 8% 10628 331.26 1 8% 10628 156.68 8% 10628 179.52 8% 10628 588.37 8% 10628 1 1 1 Del. Water & Sewer 168.28 1 9e!. Water ~_ Sewe.~-~: ~ ~1 Del. Water & Sewer ~ 7~,~1 Del. Water & Sewer 145.09 I 8% 10628 Del. Water & Sewer 66.12 I 8% 10628 Del. Water & Sewer 122.63 1 8% 10628 Del. Water & Sewer 163.35 I 8% 10628 Del. Water & Sewer 208.31 i 8% 10628 Del. Water & Sewer 216.38 I 8% 10628 Del. Water & Sewer 205.63 I 8% 10628 Del. Water & Sewer 170.25 I 8% 10628 Del. Water & Sewer 150.60 I 8% 10628 Del. Water & Sewer 126.87 i 8% 10628 Del. Water & Sewer 130.01 I 8% 10628 8% 10628 v.°~ - 10528-"--~ 8% 10628 September 22, 1987 30-117-23 22 0020 25-117-24 21 0077 13-117-24 21 0030 · Del. Water & Sewer 136.04 I 8% 10628 Del. Water & Sewer 180.65 i 8% 10628 Del. Water & Sewer 200.65 I 8% 10628 The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time on or before October 30, 1987, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. e After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of the assessment through December 31 of the following year. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. The following Councilmembers'voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO, 87- RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID CLEAII-UP ASSESSRENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $50.00 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY. AUDITOR AT 8Z INTEREST LEVY t106Z7 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: UNPAID CLEAN-UP CHARGES NOW, lllEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HOUND: Such proposed special assessment as amended~ copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. ~ e PID t Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments as fol lows: .' INT. IHPROVEHENT AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY 13-117-24 41 0051 CLEAN-UP CHARGES $50.00 I 8% 10627 ® The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time on or before October 30, 1987, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list..and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of the assessment through December 31 of the following year. e The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. September 22, 1987 ; The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO, 87- RESOLUTION AOOPTING UNPAID BOARDING UP OF HOUSE ASSESSHENT ROLL IN THE AHOUNT OF $300,00 TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY. AUDITOR AT 8% INTEREST LEVY 110626 WREREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and-passed upo~ all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: UNPAID BOARDING UP OF HOUSE CHARGES NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CXl~ OF HOUND: Such proposed special assessment as amended~ copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. _ ® PID ~ Such assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments as fol 1 ows: INT. IHPROVEMENT AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY # 19-117-23 34 0036 BOARDING UP OF HOUSE CHARGES $300.00 I 8% 10626 e The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time on or before October 30, 1987, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued ~o the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list:and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of the assessment through December 31 of the following year. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. September 22, 1987 ' The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Attest: City Clerk Mayor September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED & SUPPLEI~NTAL ASSESSI~NTS UPON WAIVER OF FORNALITIES: DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ABSTRACT; & DIRECTING CERTIFICATION.TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR LEVY ~10630 - ~ ~!~,~ WHEREAS, the C.ity Council, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, (Laws 1953., Chapter 398, as amended) has the power to levy .supplemental .. assessments and the power to levy deferred assessments; and -. WHEREAS, the following assessments were not initially levied in the projects as indicated, but waivers of formality for supplemental and deferred assessments have been executed by the property owner and delivered to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby: Pursuant to its authority under Chapter 429, Minnesota Statutes, the City Council does hereby determine that each of the parcels"of land hereinafter described have benefited in an amount equal to the amount set opposite each of the said parcels by virtue of the project as indicated and that they be, and hereby are, assessed in the amount set opposite each such described parcel, and each such supplemental and deferred assessment shall be payable in equal an- nual installments over such period of years as shown: INT. PID ~ IHPROVEMENT AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY 18-117-23 32 0014 Supp. Street Imp. #8297 1,828.15 8 8.2% 10630 23-117-24 41 0017 Supp. Street Imp. #8297 3,656.30 8 8.2% 10630 18-117-23 32 0025 Supp. Street Imp. #8297 :1,825.15 8 8.2% 10630 24-117-24 14 0057 Supp. Street Imp. #8297 1,307.17 8 8.2% 10630 The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time on or before October 30, 1987, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City September 22, 1987 of Mound..with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of the assessment through December 31 of the following year. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers Voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED & SUPPLE~NTAL ASSESSI~NTS UPON WAIVER OF FORRRLITIES: DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ABSTRACT; & DIRECTING CERTIFICATION.TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR LEVY 110631 - $292.00 WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, (Laws 1953, Chapter 398, as amended) has the power to levy supplemental assessments and the power to levy deferred assessments; and .. WHEREAS, the following assessments were not initially levied in the projects as indicated, but waivers of formality for supplemental and deferred assessments have been executed by the property owner and delivered to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby: Pursuant to its authority under Chapter 429, Minnesota Statutes, the City Council does hereby determine that each of the parcels'of land hereinafter described have benefited in an amount equal to the amount set opposite each of the said parcels by virtue of the project as indicated and that they be, and hereby are, assessed in the amount set opposite each such described parcel, and each such supplemental and deferred assessment shall be payable in equal an- nual installments over such period of years as shown: PID t INT. IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY 18-117-23 32 0025 Supp. Sewer ~3190 292.00 1 6% 10631 e The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time on or before October 30, 1987, 'following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment ag6inst any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the ~ate of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of the assessment through December 31 of the following year. 0 The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists ifor the County, and such assessments shall be collected and September 22, 1987 paid over. in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. ~ The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87Z RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED & SUPPLE~NTAL A~ESS~ENTS UPON WAIVER OF FORHALITIES: DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ABSTRACT; & DIRECTING CERTIFICATION .TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR LEVY ~1063Z - $931.12 WREREAS, the City Council, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, (Laws 1953, Chapter 398, as amended) has the power to levy supplemental assessments and.the power to levy deferred assessments; and WHEREAS, the following assessments were not initially levied in the projects as indicated, but waivers of formality for supplemental and deferred assessments have been executed by the property owner and delivered to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Cit9 Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby: Pursuant to its authority under Chapter 429, Minnesota'Statutes, the City Council does hereby determine that each of the parcels of land hereinafter described have benefited in an amount equal ~to the amount set opposite each of the said parcels by virtue of the project as indicated and that they be, and hereby are, assessed in the amount set opposite each such described parcel, and each such supplemental and deferred assessment, shall be payable in equal an- nual installments over such period of years as shown: PID t INT. IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY 13-117-24 31 0070 Supp. Sewer Lat. (3388) $542.40 2 6% 10632 19-117-23 24 0091Supp. Sewer Lat. (3388) $388.72 2 6% 10632 ® The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time on or before October 30, 1987, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of the assessment through December 31 of the following year. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax September 22, 1987 lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolUtion was moved b? Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk RESOLUTION #0. 87~ September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED & SUPPLEI'ENTAL ASSESSI~NTS UPON WAIVER OF FORIMLITIES: DIRECTING PREPARATION OF ABSTRACT; & DIRECTING CERTIFICATION ~TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR LEVY 110633 - $2,341.80 WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, (Laws 1953, Chapter 398, as amended) has the power to levy supplemental assessments and.the power to levy deferred assessments; and WHEREAS, the following assessments were not initially levied in the projects as indicated, but waivers of formality for supplemental and deferred assessments have been executed by the property owner and delivered to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Cit~ Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby: Pursuant to its authority under Chapter 429, Minnesota Statutes, the City Council does hereby determine that each of the parcels of land hereinafter described have benefited in an amount equal 'to the amount set opposite each of the said parcels by virtue of the project as indicated and that they be, and hereby are, assessed in the amount set opposite each such described parcel, and each such supplemental and deferred assessment shall be payable in equal an- nual installments over such period of years as shown: PID ~ IMT. IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY 19-117-23 24 0091Supp. Street (7514) $1,170.90 7 8% 10633 19-117-23 24 0092 Supp. Street (7514) $1,170.90 7 8% 10633 The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time on or before October 30, 1987, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mpund with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of the assessment through December 31 of the following year. e The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax September 22, 1987 lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED & SUPPLEI~#TAL ASSESSI~#TS UPON WAIVER OF FORMALITIES: DIRECTING PREPAPJ¥1'ION OF ABSTRACT; & DIECTING CERTIFICATION TO .THE ~U~ AUDITUR LEVY ~I0§34 - $II2.0i WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, (Laws 1953, Chapter 398, as amended) has the power to levy supplemental assessments and.the power to levy deferred assessments; and WHEREAS, the following assessments were not initially levied in the projects as indicated, but waivers of formality for supplemental and deferred assessments have been executed by the property owner and delivered to the City. HOW, THEREEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby: Pursuant to its authority under Chapter 429, Minnesota Statutes, the City Council does hereby determine that each of the parcels of land hereinafter described have benefited in an amount equal 'to the amount set opposite each of the said parcels by virtue of the project as indicated and that they be, and hereby are, assessed in the amount set opposite each such described parcel, and each such supplemental and deferred assessment shall be payable in equal an- nual installments over such period of years as shown: PID ~ INT. IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT YEARS RATE LEVY 19-117-23 24 0091 Supp. Water (3397) $112.01 2 6% 10634 ® The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time on or before October 30, 1987, following the date of assessments, pay the whole of the assessment agginst any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and he 'may until November 15, following the assessment date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December following the date of the assessment. After November 15, following the date of the assessment, the first year's installment shall be added to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as taxes with interest accruing from the date of the assessment through December 31 of the following year. e The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. September 22, 1987 The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS SNOW REMOVAL FROM PARKING LOTS IN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT MOUND, MINNESOTA The City of Mound will receive bids at 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota until 10:O0 A.M. on Monday, AugUst 31, 1987 for snow removal from the Central Business District parking lots and other areas as designated. Bid Bond is required. Performance Bond will be required of successful bidder. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids and waive any informalities. Bid forms may be obtained from Public Works at 4845 Manchester Rd., Mound, MN. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk The City reserves the right to reject any and all Bids, and waive any informalities. The successful bidder will send the bill for above service to the City on a monthly basis. These bids are to be firm for the 19 87 & 19 88 winter snow removal season, Ae Ce Front End Loaders: EQUIPMENT & OPERATOR (Hourly Rate) (2-or 2~ yd. bucket) Per Hour Trucks: Single Axle, 5-yd. box. Tandem Axle, lO yd. box 'List all other equipment to be used for parking lot snow removal, hourly rate with operator. September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION APPROVING A ONE-THIRD HILL LEVY FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF NSA 462.4II THRU 462.705, OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPHENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF HOUND FOR THE YEAR I988 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound is the. governing body of the City of Mound; and ' WHEREAS, the City Council has received two resolutions from the Housing & Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound: one entitled, "Resolution Approving the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority Budget for the Year 1988 Pursuant to MSA Chapter 462.545, Subdivision 6" and the other entitled, "Resolution Establishing the Tax Levy for the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the Year 1988"; and WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of MSA 462.545, Subdivision 6, must by resolution consent to' the proposed tax levy of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of MoUnd, Minnesota, that a special tax be levied upon real and personal property within the City of Mound in the amount equal to one-third of a mill, $23,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the said one-third mill is approved by this Council to be used for the operation of the Mound Housing & Redevelopment Authority pursuant to the provi- sions of MSA 462.411 thru 462.705, and shall be certified as a tax levy to the County Auditor of Hennepin County on or before October 13, 1987. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember TUe following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Attest: City Clerk Mayor ~O~N~ ~ RESOLUTe'OH I40. .//_ RBSOLUTION. APPROVI~qG T~rE RO~lqD I~D~~~~ AUTHORITY BUDGET FOR TIlE YEAR -. PURSUAIqT TO }iSA CHA.PTER 462o545,' SUBDi'~ISION · .W H ERAS, 'the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority has considered the attached budget and finds that this budget is necessary for the operation of the Mound Housing and Redevel0pment Authority during the year 1982; and WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of ~he City of Mound understands that pursuant to MSA 462.545, Subdivision 6, its budget must be approved before a special tax may be levied~ and WHEREAS, the gover~ing body of the City of Mound, by consent resolution, must approve and authorize the }evy for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority which would be imposed as a special tax upon all property, both real:and personal, within the taxing district of the City of Hound; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound that the attached budget of the Housing and RedeveloPment Authority for said. City is hereby approved. "' BE iT'FURT~R..RESOLVED that'a copy of this .resolu'tion, together with the attached ~udget, be submitt~d to the City Council 0f the City oz Hound together with a consent resolution'for ado9tion by the City Council of the City of Mound authorizing the levy of a special tax, for the purposes of HSA 462.411 to 46'2.705~ upon. all property, both real and personal, within said City. Passed by the~ousing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound this Secretary ~OU~D ~aA R~SOLUTION NO. City of Mound, as Section BE IT RESOLVED By the ~ousing and Redevelopment Authority of the follows~ That there be and hereby is levied a one-third mill levy for the year 1985 on all taxable property, real and personal, situate within the corporate limits of the City of Mound and not exempted by the Constitution of the State of Minnesota or the " valid laws of the State of Minnesota, for the purposes of establishing an ERA Fund an~ conducting the operation of an HRApursuant'to the provisions of M.S.A. 4~2,411 thru 462.705. Section ..Se'ction 3: That the consent resolution by the City Council o£ the City of Mound to this special tax for the operation of the Rousin$ and Redevelopment Authority is attached to thzs resolution.and made 'part of it. That said ~ax rate and lev~ shall be certified to the County Auditor of Rennepin County On or before' October 10, 198~, Passed by the H~usin_9 and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound this ~.day ~-~~ , 198 ~. " Eldo Schmidt c~irman September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE GENERAL OBLIGATION IHPROVEHENT BONDS OF 1976 IN THE AHOUNT OF $2,059.71 WHEREAS, there is a Resolution t76-372 with the Hen- nepin County Auditor directing a levy of $2,059.71 for General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1976; and WHEREAS, it appears that there will be sufficient funds to cover the principal and interest due in 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby direct the Hennepin County Auditor not to make the levy of $2,059.71 for 1988 taxes payable for the General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1976. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers*voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative': Mayor Clerk September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE GENERAL 0BLIGAT[ON INPROVENENT BONDS OF 1979 IN THE AHOUNT OF $19~083.00 WHEREAS, there is a Resolution J79-295 with the Hen- nepin County Auditor directing a levy of $19,083.00 for General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1979; and WHEREAS, it appears that there will be sufficient fun~s to cover the principal and interest due in 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the' City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby direct the Hennepin County Auditor not to make the levy of $19,0~3.00 for 1988 taxes payable for the General Obligation Improvemedt Bonds of 1979. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers vot_ed in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest City Clerk Septe:mber 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVENENT BONDS OF 1980 IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,870.00 · . WHEREAS, there is a Resolution ~80-223 with the Hen- nepin County Auditor directing a levy of $5,870.00 for General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1980; and WHEREAS, it appears that there will be sufficient funds to cover the principal and interest due in 1988. NOW, THEREFDRE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby direct the Hennepin County Auditor not to make the levy of $5,870.00 for 1988 taxes payable for 'the General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1980. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative': Mayor Attest City Clerk September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION HO. 87- RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVERENT BONDS OF 1978 IN THE AMOUNT OF $16,540.00 WHEREAS, there is a Resolution ~78-302 with the Hen- nepin County Auditor directing a levy of $16,540.00 for General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1978; and WHEREAS, it appears that there will be sufficient fun~s to cover the principal and interest due in 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYEO that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby direct the Hennep. in County Auditor not to make the levy of $16,5~0..00 for 1988 taxes payable for the General Obligation Improvemen't Bonds of 1978. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmati've: The following Cou:ncilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest City Clerk September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION CANCELLING THE LEVY ON THE GENERAL OBLIGATION INPROVENENT BONDS OF 1982 IN THE AHOUNT OF $16,500.00 WHEREAS, there is a Resolution ~82-242 with the Hen- nepin County Auditor directing a levy of $16,500.00 for General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1982; and WHEREAS, it appears that there will be sufficient funSs to cover the principal and interest due in 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby direct the Hennepin County Auditor not to make the levy of $16,500.00 for 1988 taxes payable for 'the General Obligation Improvemedt Bonds of 1982. The foregoing resolution was'moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative': Mayor Attest City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR NOT TO LEVY $11,551.50 FOR FIRE EQUIP#ENT CERTIFICATES OF INDEBTEONESS OF 1984 WHEREAS, there is a Resolution ~84-119 with the Hen- nepin County Auditor directing a levy of $11,551.50 for Fire Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness of 1984; and WHEREAS, there will be funds provided through contracts with surrounding municipalities to cover the principal and inter- est due in 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council.of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby direct the Hennepin County Auditor not to levy $11.551.50 of theWS24,412.50 for 1988 taxes payable for the Fire Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness of 1984. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest City Clerk September 22, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR NOT TO LEVY $20,,597.0.6 FOR 1976 WATER REVENUE BONDS WHEREAS, funds from water revenue will be great enough to pay principal and interest payments due in 1988 on the 1976 Water Revenue Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council Of the City of Hound, Hinnesota, does hereby request that the Hen- nepi.n County Auditor not levy $20,597.06 established for the taxes payable in 1988 for Water Revenue Bonds. The foregoing resolution was moved by. Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers'voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest City Clerk MINUTES OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 10, 1987 Present were: Chair Nancy Clough; Cormnissloners Shirley Andersen, Linda Panetta, and Lowell ~enson; Council Representative Phyllis Jessen; City Manager Ed Shukle; Dock Inspector D~ll Rudolph; Sun~er Park Recreational Director Kelli Meyer and Secretary Marge Stutsman. Absent and excused were Commissioners M~rilyn Byrnes(1E) and Andy Ge~rhart(2E); also absent were Commissioners Cathy Bailey(1U), Cheryl Burns(1U) and Delores Maas(1E & 1U). The following interested person%fas also present: Dick Olexa. MINUTES The minutes of the Park Commission meeting of August 13, 1987 were presented f~r consideration. Jessen moved and Swenson seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the August 13th Park Commission meeting as presented. The vote ~as all in favor. Review of 1988 Dock Application & LMCD Fee Increase & Co~nercial Dock Report Dell Rudolph, Dock Inspector, reported the only difference on this application from what Commission has discussed before is the change in'the LMCD dock rules; before they charged a flat $10.00 per dock and now it is on per footage of boats. The cost for 400 docks has been $4,000 and Dell went back and counted 567 boats which will cost about double based on the footage of the boats. Henoted that, until after the first inspection of the year, it will be difficult to know what boats are really there and how much to send in to LMCD. The Commission discussed the matter and it w~s questioned if City couldn't rebut because it is too much administrative responsibility. Swenson brought up that boaters.using public access come in free and actually use the lake more than some of the boats that are. kept on the lake which is very unfair. Dell noted we are only category charged on this basis/other commercial docks pay on the basis of footage of slips. It was also mentioned that City pays for the docks plus sup- porting the LMCD. It was suggested that-a letter be drafted to be signed by the Park Commission and Council Representative will set up a time next week to work on letter of rebut with staff. Dell Rudolph's report on Commercial and Multiple Docks ~as also reviewed. Request to do a Cemetery plantinq Dick Olexa of 6609 Bartlett Boulelrard has requested to do a planting on portion of two'corner lots (unusable as grave sites) shox~n on drawing. The planting will include t~ee with flowers to side and front so as to not encroach on driveway/ there is a similar planting on other side of this driveway. The Commission dis- cussed the request briefly and thanked Mr. Olexa. Clough moved and Panetta seconded a motion to recommend approxral of the request to do the planting as shown on drawing. The vote was unanimously in favor. This will be on the Council agenda September 22, 1987. Letter reqarding Dock site ~ 43942 The Dock Inspector explained that ~e has sent Mr. Empson 3 notices for non-compliance such as failure to remove dock sections, boat lift, etc. from the Commons and also weeds and debris by dock site are unsightly and now, he is requesting the Con~nission to authorize his sending the enclosed letter stating that the Park Commission will withhold 1988 dock permit until Mr. Empson assures them in writing that ~his 'will not occur again. The Commission discussed and suggested changing word "permit" to "application". CITY OF HOUND Mound, M~nnesota NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED VACATION OF. PORTION OF PHELPS ROAD ON THE EAST SIDE OF TUXEDO BOULEVARD ABUTTING LOTS 13 AND ]4, BLOCK 20, WHIPPLE (33']4 Tuxedo Boulevard) TO WHOM IT. MAY cONCERN: NOTICE-IS HEREBY GIVEN, that a public hear|ng will be held at the Mound City Hall, 5341Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. on the 14th day of September, 1987 to consider the vacation of the following des- cribed portiOn of street: Phelps Road on the East side of Tuxedo Boulevard abutting Lots and 14, Block 20, Whlpple; PID 25-117-24 21 0072 Such persons as desire to be heard .with reference to the above will be heard at this .meeting. Francene C. CTbrk, City Cler~ "~, 59 2¢$o APPLICATION FOR STREET VACATION CITY OF MOUND 3/84 CASE NO. FEE $150.00 DATE F ILED~7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY APPLICANT: i5, I¥ STREET TO BE VACATED REASON FOR REQUEST ///////////I Applicant's Interest in Property Residents and owners of property abutting the street to be vacated: (Please attac~list~ Certi*ied mailing listscan be obtained from Hennepin County by calling 348-3271) Recommended by Utilities: NSP ~ ; Recommended by City: Public Works Minnegasco L-g<~; Continental Telephone ; Fire Chief ; Engineer ; Police Chief ~ ; Cable'Systems .; Other Departments g Commission Recommendatio Denial of the request because proposed vacation would cut off access to lots that appear to be buildable to the east. The vote on the denial was unanimous. Date September 14~ lp87. Council Action Resolution No. Date 75 YEARS CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 (612) 472-1155 September 17, 1987 TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ~?.~. ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER LOST LAKE RfP - PROPOSAL As you recall, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was developed earlier this summer by the City Planner and myself, requesting proposals for a country inn development in the Lost Lake area. The RFP was advertised in the Laker and also Real Estate Journal, a popular and hlgh)y reputable journal that is read by developers of all sizes. Copies'were also sent to other inter- ested persons, whom we knew were interested in receiving an RFP. A total of 25 RFPs were sent to interested firms and individuals. The deadline for receiving theproposals was September 1, 1987. For your review, the RFP contained descriptions of the project opportunity, background of the project, community location map, site location map, project objectives, market potential, site characteristics, map of the Lost Lake area, potential financial incentives, submission requirements, selection process and evaluation criteria. The interested developer was to follow a llst of requirements for submission. Upon receiving the pro- posal, a selection process was to be followed for review of each proposal. The selection process stated in the RFP i~cluded: 1. Letters of interest and all other required proposal materials must bt submitted to the City of Mound by the deadline date, 2. That upon receipt of all submittals, the Mound City Council would conductoa review and invite a selected number of development teams for interviews. 3. Following those interviews, the City would select a dev- eloper to be designated as the "Developer of Record" Once designated, that developer would have the exclusive right to negotiate with the City of Mound for the implementation of a mutually satisfactory Lost Lake project. 4. The selected Developer of Record would have to be prepared to promptly enter into an "Agreement for Exclusive Negotiation" with the City of Mound for the development of a specific proposal for the Lost Lake project area. iThe exact terms of the agreement would be formulated by both the developer and the City. LOST LAKE MEMO TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 17, 1987 PAGE 2 5. A detailed proposal for the Lost Lake project will then be developed under the terms of the agreement. The developer would be expected to undertake major efforts with the City providing support and continuous feedback. The detailed proposal would include, but not be limited to, the following items: a) Basic project design; b) Required public improvements; c) Site acquisition; d) Financing Pro Forma for public and private improvements; e) Assignment of public and private sector responsibilities; f) Project timing. A period of 90 days would be provided to the developer for performance under the terms of the agreement. The City would retain the right at its sole discretion, to extend the negotiations beyond the original time period, if substantial progress had been made and it appears that such an extension was necessary to continue good faith efforts. In the event that the City and the developer could not make adequate progress towards a satisfactory development proposal, the agreement for exclusive negotiations would be terminated in accordance with the terms contained therein. 6. After the City and the developer had created a mutually agreeable development plan for the project area, both parties would negotiate a formal "Development Agreement" This agreement would specify each party's specific roles and obligations in the implementation of the project. Time frame for those negotiations would be subsequently determined. In addition, prospective developers would be evaluated in accordance with the following criteria: 2. 3. 4. 5. Developer expertise Developer quality Experience with similar projects Organizational personnel Financial capabilities On the afternoon of September l, 1987, we received six copies of a proposal for a country inn and trail system at the Lost Lake area. The proposal was submitted by Waterford Development Group,'lnc., of Edina, Minnesota. The proposal was submitted by Mr. Richard C. Bienapfl, President of Waterford Development Group, Inc. The proposal was delivered via Nell Weber, archi- tect with Richard Schwarz/Neil Weber, of Hopkins, Minnesota. This was the only proposal that we have received for the project. The proposal has been evaluate~ in a preliminary fashion by Mark Koegler, City Planner, and myself to make sure that the requirements listed in the RFP were satisfied. Based upon those requirements, it appears, on a preliminary basis, that the developer meets the submission requirements. We are now in step #2 of the selection process described above; that is, the Mound City Council is to conduct a review and invite a selected number of development teams for interviews. Item #2 is a big step, as it indicates that the Counci.1 will conduct a review. LOST LAKE MEMO TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 17, 1987 PAGE 3 In order to clearly define what that review would be, I think it would be a good idea at this time to discuss a suggested review procedure. In other words, I think that item #2 involves a great deal of work, assuming that the City Council is reacting favorably to the proposal. If it is the City Council's intent to pursue review of the proposal, I think the following items should be considered: 1. At the September 22, 1987 ~City Council meeting, this item will be on the agenda. The City Council will have the opportunity to discuss, on a preliminary basis, the proposal to get a preliminary reaction as to whether or not they are interested in going forward. 2. Assuming that the interest is there, the Council may want to schedule a special Council meeting. At that time, the prospective developer can be present to discuss his proposal in more detail, and have interaction with the City Council. The Council may want to invite the Planning Commission, Park Commission and any other citizens of the community interested in this subject to that meeting. 3. Subsequent meetings would have to be held with the developer and the City eventually deciding whether or not this developer would become the "Developer of Record". unless the City Council totally objects to the proposed project, I believe it would be in the best interest of the City of Mound to begin preliminary discussions with Waterford Development Group, Inc. Yes, it is true that this is the only proposal that we received. However, I believe we owe it to both the developer and ourselves that a carefUl review of this'proposal is carried out. You are not obligating yourselves to anything at this point. The selection process described above can subsequently be carried out as stated once the City feels comfortable with Waterford Development Group's proposal. Mr. Bienapfl and Mr. Weber will be present at the City Council meeting Tuesday evening to answer any questions that you may have regarding this matter. If you have any questions of Mark Koegler or myself on this item, please do not hesitate to contact us. ES:ls RESOLUTION NO. 87- CASE NO. 87-662 PROPOSED RESOLUTION RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ALLOW A TWO STALL GARAGE WITH ENTRY FOR LOT 9, BLOCK 2, MOUND TERRACE; PID # 14-117-24 32 0019 (6350 RAMBLER LANE) P ~ Z CA§E NO. §7-~2 WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to construct a one story attached 22 by 24 foot garage with an entry to the front of the home with a 10 by 10 foot storage area for Lot 9, Block 2, Mound Terrace; PID No. 14-117-24 32 0019; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-2 Single Family Zoning District, which according to the City Code, requires a 20 foot front yard set- back and 6 foot sldeyards,-50 foot lakeshore setback; and WHEREAS, Section 23.404 Subdivision (8) provides that alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful non-conforming residential use when the alteration will improve the llvability thereof, but the alteration may not increase the number of units. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: That the City does hereby authorize the existing structural alterations setforth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, non-conforming use, subject to all the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. It is determined that the livability of the resTdential unit will be improved by authorizing the following alterations to .the property_and hereby grants the variance request due to the topography and shape of the lot: The City does authorize the two stall 22 by 24 foot one story garage addition as shown on Exhibit "A" '"'._ ~ - '-- -- - ;~;:_~' -_ -~. the 10 X 10 foot storage area for 6350 Rambler Lane't~'~-~c CASE NO. 87-662 TO: Planning Commission, Applicantca~Staff FROM: Jan Bertrand,.Building Official Planning Commission agenda of September 54 1987 ~SE NO. 87-662 APPLICANT: Gayle J. and Carol A Schuffenhauer LOCATION: 6350 Rambler Lane LEGAL DESC.: Lot 9, Block 2, Mound Terrace; 14-117-24 32 0019 SUBJECT: front and side yard variance EXISTING ZONING: R-2 single f~mily PROPOSAL: The applicants are proposing to construct a one-story attached garage with a 10 by 10 foot storage area, 22 by 24 foot garage with an entry to the front of the house (existing doorway). The addition would be within 4 feet of the side property line and 1.7 foot to the street front property line.at the closest point as per exhibit "A". The existing structure has conforming setbacks,~bulk of building, and lot area. The zoning ordinance requires a 20 foot setback to the south and 10 foot to the west; the west setback is 13.8 at the ctosest point. The required side yard is 6 feet to'the east. COMMENTS: The Rambler Lane right-of-way is paved to the west side of 'the property but not from the front edge of the house to the lake~at the southwest to northwest side of the property. There is a steep embankment going from south to the low end at the north and from the east side to the structure. The shape of the front of the lot makes it difficult to align the front of the structure to the setback of 20 feet. Visually coming.down the hill from the east, the embankment is more of an obstruction to visibility than a garage structure. RECOMMENDATION: To allow a two stall garage with the entry into the existing doorway at 22 by 24 foot one story addition, it could be placed as a partial retaining wall of the steep sloop to the east but would require some setback to place a counter sloop away from the building. Staff reco.mmends granting the variance request due to topography and shape of the lot. However, if the owner would like a 10 by 10 storage area, it could be place with conforming setbacks elsewhere on the property. A vehicUlar.' access would not be necessary from a storage building. The abutting neighbors have been notified. This will be referred to the City Council on September 22,1987. ' ~j ~ ~ . ~7~1 . OF YP' the following infor~ion) 1, S~ree[ Address of Property ~J~O ~~Z~ 2. Legal DesCription of Property: Lot Case No. ~7 Fee Paid ~5-¢ ~ Date Filed ~"/¢ Block AdditiOn ~ oo~J r) -f~KR ~e_~ PID No. 1"'/-//7-,~"/ ,.~...L ~/~ ~. Applicant (if other than owner)= Name Day Phone No. Address 5. Type of Request: e (~) Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review (') Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. (.) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other *If other, specify: ~resent ~oning District " Existing Use(s) of Property ~v~'~ Has an application ever been made forOzOni~g',-y- t var~Jance,/I or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? /v/O If so, llst date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies.of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I Certify that all of the above statements and the' statements contained in any required papers or plans to' be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Hound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining 'and removing Such notices as may be requi.red by law..__ / Signature of AppI can J~/C/fl, u~fr-~c~L~Vv4~-'-,'~ · ~/ // Plannlng Commission Recommendation: To accept the staff recommendation to allow two stall garage 22 by 24 feet with an entry to the front of the house; storage buildlng would have to be placed with conforming setbacks. Vote unanimously in favor. Date 9-14-87 Council Action: Resolution No. Date ? Request for Zoning Variance Procedure (2) Cas # D. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any addltlonal' information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. Ill.'Request for a Zoning Variance A. Ail information below, a site plan, as described in Part I!, and general appllcatlon must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Does the present use of. the property'conform to a11 use regulations for the zone district in whlch it is located? Yes (X) No ( ) if "non, specify each nOn-conforming use: Ce Do the exlstlng structures' comply with a11 area helght and bulk regulations for the zone district In which It Is.located? Yes (Y) No'( ) if ~tnon, s~ecify each non-conforming use: Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable Fse for any or,he uses permitted in that zoning district/ ($) .Too narrow (~(.~ Topography ( ) Soil '( ) Too small () Drainage ( ) Sub-surface ( ) .Too shal!ow (X) Shape. ( ) Other: Specify: Was the hardship d~scribed above created by the action of anyone haying property lq~erests in the'land after 'the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (~) If yes, explaln: F. Was .the hardship created by'any'other man-made change, such as the reloca- 'tion of a road? Yes ( ) No. (X) If yes, explain: Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance pecullar only to the property described in this petition? Yes . (X) No ( ) If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? What is the "minimum'~ modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? August 24, 1987 AUG 2 To: Planning Commission, City of Mound From: Ga¥1e J. $chuffen!~auer RE: Needed varience for garage at 6350 Rambler Lane Dear Commissioners: I would like to build an attached garage at the above location. 'tr'~e proposed garage will be approximately fifteen feet high and will fit in with the roof line of the house. The garage will have a hollow concrete block wall on the E~st side where it abuts the hill. This will also add support to the hill. I feel we need this varience as frankly, there is no other place to put a garage. We need the size garage indicated on the survey as we are a two car family and will need this space to Dark both cars. The builder of the proposed garage will be Gene Gervais who built our home. He will side the garage as he did the house. I can only hope that the Commission will look favorably at this application. Sincerely Yours, Certificate of for Gene Garv~ais . of Lot 9'~ ~.BlOck'~'2. · l;~k:_. ~.~.Hennepin Couniy, 'MinhesOta; ~ ~ :~ ~,T -',.,.~ ~"" 40' c'.. EXHIBIT "A" I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of Lot 9, Block 2, "Mound Terrace", and the location of all existing buildings thereon. It does not purport to show other improve- ments or encroachments. COFFIN & GRONBERG, iNc. Mark':.LS.: Grbnberg Lic.~ No~.: 12755.' ~ng'i n~ers, Land-Survey.ors;. Pi'anners Long Lake;'~: Mi~nesOt.a .. Scale: l" = 40' Date : 8~16-89 o : Iron marker /~Y3~: Spot eleMa]tion Datum: Mound City sewer datum September 13, 1987 City of Mound Planning Commission Mound, MN. 55364 Dear Commissioners: I have no objection to a Garage being constructed on the lot abutting my property. The rear of the garage will re-enforce the hill between our respective properties and Greatly benifit us both. Respectfully Yours, Douglas U. Briggs ZI9.2 CASE NO. 87-663 PROPOSED RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUT'I'ON TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ALLOW AN ADDITION FOR PARTS OF LOTS 17 AND 18, BLOCK 24 SHADYWOOD POINT; PID NO. 13-117-24 11 0094 (4945 GLEN ' ELYN ROAD) P & Z CASE NO. 87-663 WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to recognize an existing non-conforming 6 foot front yard setback to allow an addition of 18.2 feet by 52 feet and a 22 by 36 foot 3 stall 1 story garage for part of Lots 17 and 18, Block 24, Shadywood Point; PID No. 13-117-24 11 0094; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-1 Single Family Zoning District which according to the City Code, requires a 30 foot front yard setback, 10 foot sideyards, and 15 foot rear yard and a minimum dwelling size of 840 square feet; and WHEREAS, Section 23.404 Subdivision (8) provides that alterations may be made to a building coptaining a lawful non-conforming residential unit when the alter- ation will improve the livability thereof, but the alteration does not increase the number of units. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: That the City does hereby authorize the existing nonconforming principal st'ructure at 4945 Glen Elyn Road; PID # 13-117-24 11 0094. o The City Council authorizes the existing structural setback violation and authorizes the alterations setforth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Sub- division (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, non-conforming use, subject to all the provisions and restric- tions of Section 23.404. It is determined that the livabJllty of the residential unit will be improved by authorizing the following alterations to the non-conforming use property: The addition of an 18.2 by 52 foot one story addition to the living space wi'th a 22 by 36 foot 3 stall one story garage to the existing 18.2 by 28.3 foot-one story dwelling as a slab on grade as shown on the site plan identified as Exhibit "A". Upon the further condition that the existing dwelling be brought to current building code, correct the drainage on the site to divert water from the existing and new addition, and removal of the front 4.6 by 6.2 ft. entryway. CASE NO. 87-663 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jan Bertrand,.Building Official Planning Commission Agenda' of.September 14, 1987 CASE NO. 87-563 APPLICANT: Mr. Brian R. Johnson LOCATION: 4945 Glen Elyn Road LEGAL DESC.: Parts of Lots 17 and 18, Shadywood Point all in block 24; PID #13-117-24 11 0094 SUBJECT: SETBACK VARIANCE OF EXISTING STRUCTURE EXISTING ZONING: R-1 single iamily PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to add a 18.2 by 52 foot one story addition to the living space with a 22 by 36 foot three stall one story garage to an existing 18.2 by 28.3 foot one story dwelling with a slab on-grade. The floor area is 504 sq. ft. the required is 840 sq. ft. minimum. The property was subdivided in July to have a conforming side yard for lots of record of 6 f-eet and to bring the lot area to within 10% of the required 10,000 sq. ft. in the R-1 zoning district; lot area 9,187 sq. ft. The front yard' setback. however, i~'6 feet ±;'the required setback is 30 feet to the existing structure. COMMENTS: The dwelling is 17 feet from the curb line as the boulevard is 11 feet. The structure is currently valued at$16,200. The applicant has a slab on-grade home, with a cesppool in the yard which must be filled, a wall heater to heat the home, etc. The applicant does plan to correct all of the deficiencies in the structure, such as, but not limited to, ~central heating, correct yard grading, fill cesspool, additional outlets for electrical and bring to current code, size water piping to code with waste and venting of plumbing, plumbing accessibility, new water heater, change all windows, etc. RECOMMENDATION: The addition portion of the structure will have conforming setbacks to'the property lines for lots of record, the floor area will bring the structure to the minimum floor area. Staff recommends granting the variance upon the condition that corrections be made to the existing dwelling to bring it. into conformance with current building code and correct the drainage on the site.to divert water away from the existing and new addition with removal of the front 4.6 by 6.2 foot entry. The abutting neighbors have been notified. This will be referred to the City Council on September 22, 1987. CITY OF HOUND APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (Please type the following information) 4945 Gl,n R]vn wd. r,4mmd. ~. 2. Legal Description of Property: Lot No.17 Addition ShadywoodPoint PID No. 3. Owner's Name Mr. Brian R. Johnson Fee' Paid Date Fi led ~,/¢///~7 Address 4945 Glen Elyn Rd. }.~und~ }~. 55364 4. Applicant"(if other than owner): Name N.A. Address Block 1311724110094 Day Phone No. Day Phone No. 853-2165 5. Type of Request: (×!) Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U~D.. ( .) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other ¢lf other,, specify: Present Zonihg District. 7. Existing Use(s) of Property BesidentialDwellinq (Hcmestead)'. 8. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes If so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) July, 1987 Petitioned council to move property linetomakeexistin9andfuture structure confo~m. Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the above statements and th~ statements contained in any required papers or plans.to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining ~nd removing such notices as may be requ~~ ~ ~. Signature of Applicant ' . brianr, johnson2~a;c~ ~ Planning Commission Recommendation: T t staff recommendation. in favor. DateAucj~st 20, If: Vote was unanimous'] 9-14-87 Date Council Action: Resolution No. Date Request' for Zoni.ng Variance Procedure ~2) Case Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, et~. E. Indicate North Compass direction .F. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the Clty Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. II!. Request for a Zonln9 Variance A.. Ali. Information below, a site plan, as described in Part I!, and general application must be provided before a hearing.will be scheduled. B, Does the'present use of the property'conform to all use regulations for the zone.district in.which It Is located? Yes (~) Ho ( )' If "no", specify each ~on-conformlng use: Co Do the existing structures comply, with"a11 area height and bulk regulations for the zone district in which it is.located? YeJ ( ) No ' (X) If "no" specify each non-conforming use: 'Existing house is on Scorner lot so the setback is nonconforminq on one side. De Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the.uses.permitted in that zoning district? .( ) .Too narrow ( ) .Topography' ( ) Soil (X) Too. small ( ) Drainage. ( ) Sub-surface '( ) 'Too shallow ( ) 'Shape ( ) Other: Specify-: Ee Was the hardship d;scrlbed aboVe created by the action o~ anyone having property interests in the land after the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (X) If yes, explain: F. Was the hardship created by a~y'other man-made change, such as the reloca-. tion of a road? Yes ( ) No' (X) If yes, explain: G. Are. the conditions of hardship for'which'you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ) No (X) If 'n~, how many'other properties are similarly affected? Ay D~opezscy. in an R-I District with less than lO,OOQ $~. F~. but within 10% of ~his no. H. What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) See attached sheets. Will granting of the variance be materially detrlmental to property in th( same zone, 6r to the enforcement of this ordinance? No C. It ? r~ Wd ~J August 20, 1987 The square footage of our parcel (Lot I?, Block 24 Shadywood) is now 9187 Square Feet. This square footage includes the B.8'x 138 addition to lot 17 as approved bY the councll in Ju!y'to make the existing house conform to the required 8'-0 setbacE on the side. This additional property also provides a G'-O or Qremter set- back ~s required for the proposed addition to the existing house. Note that the additional living space and garage will ali conform ~o R-1 Setbacks with the new property line~. .In order to ~ecure a building perml$ however, we need variance granted in order to do any further construction since the 1Ct size is s~i!l under-10,000 Square Feet. Note that the new square footage of the parcel is 9187 Square Feet which does fall within the planning commission guideline of within 10~ of t0.008 SqUare Fee~. brj:BRJ :. ,. J / / 24'-0 'Glen': Ely_n ':Rd. -0 Proposed Addition to Existing House Proposed ~House Mr. and Mrs. Brian R...Joi~'ns'On 4945 Glen .Elyn_ Rd. Mound,._ Minnesota__55364_ REVISION COMM. NO. DAT~ 8.12.87 PAGE A&ESD/17 Prepsre~ PARCEL 'JIB? L EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: Lot 17, SHADYWOOD POINT, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lots 18 and 19, SHADYWOOD POINT, according to the recorded plat thereof, tlennepin County, Minnesota. P;. ARSON o Denotes iron monument "x' Denotes cross chiseled in concrete x931.5 Denotes existing spot elevation ~ Denotes proposed spot elevation ~ ..- Denotes surface drainage Dasl%ed contour lines denote proposed features SoLid contour lines denote existing features RO4D U~¢r I llunmt PAUL W. LARSON ,,~.s, ~-o,,~, . PROPOSED pARCEL DIVISION D£SCRIPTION~: PARCSL A: ThOSe pa~a Of ~,Otl 17 and 1~, SIIADYWOOD pOINT~ mcc0~dinq ~o the recorded plat thereof, Ilennepin County, RlnllelOta lying westerly GENERAL NOTES: Proposed top of foundation elev. - Proposed basement floor elev. - Proposed garage floor elev. - BENCH~-~RK: A'LL.METRO LAND. SURVEYORS 2340 Daniels Street Long Lake, Mlnnesola 55556 Ph: 475-1453 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stat~e--of--l.~[l%neso~a. ~ ~ i I~]~/ R~G. NUMBER 1707.G FiLE It0. 8710(,-5 PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. 87-664 RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE EMERGENCY STRUCTURAL REPAIRS TO A NON-CONFORMING STRUCTURE ON LOT 14, WHIPPLE SHORES, PID # 24-117-24 43 0062 (5124 TUXEDO. BOULE- VARD) P & Z CASE NO. 87-664 WHEREAS, the applicant, Richard Rucinski, and the owner, Robert Huffman, have applied for a variance to recognize an existing non-conforming 30 foot set- back to lakeshore for Lot 14, Whipple Shores; PID # 24-117-24 43 0062; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-2 single family zoning district, which according to the City code, requires a 30 foot front yard setback, a 6 foot sideyard setback, 50 foot lakeshore setback, with a minimum flood plain elevation of 933.5 foot N.G.V.D. above Lake Minnetonka for the lowest basement floor; and WHEREAS, Section 23.404 Subdivision (8) provides that alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful non-conforming residential unit when the alteration will improve the livability thereof, but the alteration may not increase the number of units. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the City does hereby authorize the existing non-conforming principal structure setback at 5124 Tuxedo Boulevard; PID # 24-117-24 43 0062. The City Council authorizes the existing structural setback violation and authorizes the alterations setforth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use re- mains as a lawful, non-conforming use, subject to all the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. It is determined that the livabillty of the residential unit will be improved by authorizing the following structural alterations to the non-conforming use p[operty: To a'llow structural foundation replacement of the north and east walls of the existing dwelling. CASE NO. 87-664 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jan ~ertrand, Buildin~ Official Planning Commission Agenda of September 14, 1987 CASE NO. 87-664 APPLICANT: Richard Rucinski OWNER: Robert Huffman LOCATION: 5124 Tuxedo Boulevard LEGAL DESC.: Lot 14, Whipple Shores; PID# 24-117-24 43 0062 SUBJECT: Structural repairs to a non-conforming structure EXISTING ZONING: R-2 single family residential PROPOSAL: The applicant, builder, is requesting a variance to do structural foundation replacement of two wall at the north and east side the '~ existing dwelling as the recent heavy rains have washed in the foundation. A permit was obtained to do some incidental repairs which were not sufficient to adequately fix the problem. The dwelling is 38 feet from the lakeshore and the deck on the building is 30feet to the lakeshore. COMMENTS: There was an addition put on'the structure in 1977 just prior to establishing setbacks to the Ordinary High Water level of the lake. I believe the city code at the time only required average of the line of site to adjoining buildings. There has been no previous record of a variance on the property.. The building is currently valued at $31,300. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends granting the emergency repairs to the building to replace the foundation of the building. Possibly, if the value of the remodeling is one-half or more of the value of the building the entire building should be brought up to building code. The abutting neighbors have been notified. This will be referred to the City Council on September 22, 1987. ,. ;,i:; 2 6 i987 [! C TY OF HOUND , ? ~,.~: R/~.~tt t~[[. [~PPLICATION TO PLANNING S ZONING COHHISSION ' ' '"" 1~'~~ '(Please type the following infor~tion) 1. Street Address of Property ~/?_y T~~2 /~[~ Legal DesCription of'Property: Lot ,~ Block Se Case Fee Pai d Date Filed Addition Owner's Name Applicant '(if other than owner): Type of Request: (~~~*~() Conditional Use Permit (.) Amendment ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Revie~ ( ) Sign Permit (') ~etland Permit _ ( ) P.U.D. ( )*Other ~resent ~oning District '~~ Existing Use(s) of Property Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? ~ If so, llst date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies.of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that ~11 of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to'be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Hound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining 'and removing Such notices as may be. requi.red by law. ~ Signature of Applicant~, -~~--~ '~ ./~ ~ -/~-'~~~'~ Date Planning Commission Recommendation: To accept staff recommendation aDDrovinq emcroencv repairs to replace foundation of buildln~'s north and east walls. Vote was unanimously in favor. Date 9-14-87 Council Action: Resolution No. Date D. Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilltles, etc. E. Indicate North compass directlon F. Any addit|onal information as may reasonably be required by the Clty Staff and applicable Sections of the 2onlng Ordinance. III. Request for..a Zonln~ Variance A. A11 information below, a site plan, as described in Part !1, and general appllcatlon must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Does the present use of. the property'conform to ~11/use regulations for the zone .district In which It Is located? Yes (~ rio ( ) .. If "no", specify each nOn-conforming use: Ce Do the existing structures' comply with all area heigh~and bulk regula~lons for the zone district in which it is.located? Ye~ (~ No ( ) If "no~, ~pecify each non-conforming use: D. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent Its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning dlstrict3 ( ) .Too narrow ( ) Topography ( ) Soil ( ) Too. small ( ) Drainage (~,)) Sub-surface ( ) Too shallow ( ) Shape. ( Other': Specify: 1. . / . E. ~ (h'~ard~i~ d~scribed above created by the action o~anyone hav~ng property interests in the land after 'the Zoning Ordinance ~as adopted2 Yes ( ) No (~ if yes, explain: / Fe Was the hardship created by'any'other man-made change, such as the reloca- tion of a road? Yes ( ) No- (V) if yes, explain: Are' the conditions of hardship ~or'which y~u request a va~iance pecutlar only to the property described .In this petition? Yes .(/I~) No ( ) If no; how manyother properties are slmilarly affected?-- H. What is the '~minlmum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, ,f necessary.) :0 ~-~ ~ I. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? SCA[E, LA~rE SURVEY FOR: Earl Volkenant 5124 Tuxedo Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 SURVEY OF: Lo~ 14, Whipple Shores .~mu~.d, Minneso%a '. 114;~ '2 5" ]1 ,"4O ~o ~{o TuxEdo ~ 0 ~ :~' MIDDLE~ t)':* 0 3030 Harbor Lane North, Suite 104 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 612/553-1950 TO: Planning Com~ssion and Staff FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner ~ DATE: September 9, 1987 SUBJECT: Lakeshore and Front yard Variances APPLICANT: Roland D. McAllister CASE NO: 87-665 VHS FILE NO: 87-310-A29-ZO LfXT%TION: 1649 Bluebird Lane EXISTING ZONING:..Two Family Residential (R-3) ~SIVE PLAN: Residential .rRooOPOSAL: The applicant is seekingvariances to construct a 1,680 ± square~ t single family home on Lots 1-4,' Block 6, Dreamwood. The applicant's oposed building si~e consists of four lots totalling 10,500 square feet. The R-3 zoning district requ[res 6,0~0 square feet of lo~ area and the following setbacks: Lakeshore - 50 feet, front yard - 30 feet, and side yards - 10 feet. As proposed, the structure will require a 20 foot front yard ethack variance and a-13 foot lakeshore setback variance. C~: The subject lots were originally platted in 1907 and at that time, lots 1, 2 and half of lot 3 were shown in wetlands and were presumably unbuildable. In 1947 i, a building permit was obtained and a structure was built on the parcel. In 1972, the structure was condemned and it was subsequently demolished in 1973. In 1975, lot 4 and part of lot 3 was forfeited due to unpaid taxes. The sale of the forfeited property was withheld by the City of Mound until 1980 when lots 1, 2 and part of lot 3 also became tax-forfeited property. At that time, the city manager stated that the parcels should be combined into one building site (see enclosures). This case presents somewhat of a dilemma. In reviewing the site, it appears to be too small to reasonably support a single family structure. If the City denies the subject, request, it is, in essence, rendering the lot unbuildable. As such, the owner has the option of seeking a refund on a portion of the property taxes that have been paid on the parcel. It is also reasonable to argue that evidence exists in support of the proposed variances. From approximately 1947 to 1973, the parcel did contain a residence. Additionally, the city manager's memorandum implies, to a certain degree, that the parcel was sold on the basis of it being buildable. Additionally, the parcel was assessed approximately $1800 for lateral sanitary sewer. ! RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested variances is not consistent with sound planning practice. Staff, however, reluctantly recommends approval due to past City actions and the fact that the proposed variances represent the minimum required to make the property buildable. Approval of the front yard and lakeshore setback variances is recommended subject to the followinG condi t ions: : The grading plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Watershed District. The driveway shown on the site plan, dated 8/25/87, shall be prohibited. As as alternative, the applicant shall modify the survey to show a driveway north of the existing house with an accompanyinG potential Garage site. CITY OF MOUND APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION (Please type the following information) Street Address of Property Legal Description of Property: Lot Addition DJ"~~~/O0t~) Owner's Name '~'/'~/'~',~ //'7/ Block P,D No. 13-117-2(,/21 Day Phone No. 4. Applicant"(if other than owner): 5. Type of Request: (~) Variance ( ) Conditional Use Permit ( .) Amendmen~ ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Sign Permi~ ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. ( )~Other ( · ,If other, specify: Present Zoning District 7. Existing Use(s) of Property Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? . ~ If so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) ~opies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such S i gnature__o_f__Ap_p_] i cant ~ ~Commission Recommendatio-~n., Vote was a , Date [-2(=,-,F7 '. tie on moving staff recommendation with condition that garage would be included in the footprint as a tuckunder garage. 9-14-87 Date Council Action: Resolution No. 4/82 Date Request for Zoni,ng Variance Procedure Case if D. Location of: Signs, easements, underground uti.lities, etc. E. indicate North compass direction F. Any addltlonal information as may reasonably be requlred by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. III. Request for a Zoning Variance A. All Information below, a site plan, as described in Part Ii, and general appllcatlon must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Does the present use of. the property' conform to all use regulations for the zone .district In which It Is located? Yes ( ) Ilo ( ) ... If 'no~ Specify each non-conforming use: C. Do the existing structures· comply with all area height and bulk regulatlons for the zone district In which It Is.located? Y~s ( ) No' ( ) If ~tno', specify each non-conforming use~ ' D. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? (~) .Too narrow ( ) Topography ( ) Sol1 ( ) Too small ( ) Drainage ( ) Sub-surface .(. ) Too shallow ( .v/) '-Shape. ( ) Other: Specify: -. Was the hardship d~scrlbed above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No ~) If yes, explaln: Fe Was the ha~shlp created by any'other man-made change, such as the reloca- 'tion of a road? Yes ( ) No. (¥') If yes, explain: ~;~ 'G, Are.'the conditions of hard,ship ,for'which y?u request a variance pecu. liar only to the property descr~be,d tn this pet~tion? Yes '( ) No (~/)~ . .If .no, how many other properties ar.e similRrly affected? /~-~u:~.~'~_~ What is the "minimum" mo~ification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additlonal sheets, If necessary.) I. Will granting of the variance be materlally detriment.a~l~ to~p, roper, ty.l? t~e ..~ same zone,'.or to the enforcement of th~s ord~nanc~ / / ~/~ ~ ~ '~.~ 600 ' Certificate of Survey for Roland D. McAllister of Lots 1-4, Block 6, Dreamwood Hennepin County, Minnesota ~s.~z i hereby certify that this is a ~$~$ true and correct'representation of · a survey of the boundaries of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, Block 6, Dreamwood, and the location of all existing buildings, if any, thereon, and the proposed location of of a proposed building. It does not purport to show other improvements or encroachments,. Scale' Date · 1" = 30' 8-25-'87 lron marker Spot elevation Mound City Sewer Coffin & Gronberg, inc. Iqark S. Gronberg Lic. No. 12755 Engineers, Land Surveyors & Planners Long Lake, Minnesota o$° ? 'I I / ./ -/ ./ / / .../ 0 0 > WILLARD MORTON 3140 Chowen Ave. So., Apt. 212W Minneapolis, MN 55416 August 13, 1987 Roland McAllister I have reviewed the proposed location of your new home on the pla~ plan presented me by Jim Dobesh and find no problem with it. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesoa July 10, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-242 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land At the las~ Council meeting, the new tax forfeit land list was discussed and the Counci'l withheld action on one item: Lots 1,'2 and the North 35 feet of Lot 3, Bl~k 6, Dreamwood In 1975, Lot 4 and the South 5 feet of Lot 3, Block 6 went tax forfeit and it was held off sale. -~=: 'l~'.is--recommended.'that Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 be combined and sold as one building site. This area is zoned 6,000 square feet' and there is prob- b619' 8,000 square-feet of. land in the four lots. A setbac~ variance will hage to be granted for a'building. MOUND. MINN£SOTA 55364 ($12) Da te .' "' From: To .- · ' .Subject: Wy'chwood"" 85-3'801o/4880 July 18, 19B0' City Manage~ Leonard L. Kopp Hennep~n Cofint~.LandOepartment .1979 Tax Forfeit Property. Properties llsted below have assessments as sho~n against them. Block 24'- Lot 8 Levy 3180-Sanitary Sewer PID 24-117-24 41 0058- 33RS-Sewer Lateral .." 33977Water Wychwood.' 85.38010/4840 Oreamwood 85-61580/27~0 ~.~ ~ ......... Drean~'ood 85;61580/2830~; Bl'ock 24 - Lot'9 PID 24-117-24 41 0059 · ,,,, 3{80 3~88 .' 3397 Block G -. Lots 1, 2 s Nely. 35' of lot'3 PIDi3L117-24 21 O004" Block G -' Lot 4 & Swly 5~ · ' of Lot 3 PID 13-117-24 21 0005 318o 3388 2879-Wa ter 3180 3388 2879 7514-78 Str Imp $292..00' 606.~3 · 375.02 $t273'.45 $14~.00 425.63' 269.02 8~o. G5 $292.00 1103.63 ~9~.69 .$1890.32 $29 .oo 606,43 · . 227.64 647.91 $.!484.90 A. Lincoln Addn Lakeside Park 85-61730/0155 Blk 2 - Lots 6 S'30 : PlO 13-117-24 3~ OO07 318o 3388 3387-~ater 7514 There is the..possibilit-Y that some of the water and sewer lateral assessments man~ have something paid against them before going tax forfeit. $243.33 .516.03 251.40 2022.18 '.' $3032;94'i~` COMMON (HA RRISON S 'AY) CASE NO. 87-667 PROPOSED RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. 87- RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE TO ALLOW AN ADDITION FOR LOT 59, PHELPS ISLAND PARK FIRST DIVISION; PID NUMBER 19-117-23 34 0082 (3114 ISLAND PARK DRIVE); P & Z CASE NO. 87-667 WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied for a variance to recognize an existing nonconforming side yard setback to allow a two story addition as shown on Exhibit "A" for Lot 59, Phelps Island Park First Division; PID No. 19-117-23 34 0082; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-2 Single Family Zoning District, which according to the City Code, requires a 20 foot front yard setback and 6 foot side yards, and a 50 foot lakeshore setback; and WHEREAS, Section 23.404 Subd. (8) provides that alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful nonconforming residential unit when the alteration will improve the livabillty thereof, but the alteration may not increase the number of units. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound., Minnesota, as follows: That the City does hereby.authorize the existing nonconforming acces~ principal structure ~etback at 3114 Island Park Drive; PID # 19-117-23 34 0082. The City Council authoriZes the existing structural setback violation and authorizes the alterations setforth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subd. (8) with the clear and express under- standing that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. It is determined that the livability of the residential unit will be improved by authorizing the following alterations to the non- conforming use property: Two story expansion of the principal building as shown on Ex- hibit "A" with deck upon the condition that all new construc- tion has conforming setbacks to the lakeside and side yards; furthermore, a certified land survey shall be submitted before a building permit is issued to verify the accuracy of Exhibit / & EXHI BtT "A~' CASE NO. 87-667 z ~."95 CITY OF HOUND PLANNING & ZONINO COHhllSSION the following information) Ca,e '.o. ?'7- 47 Fee Paid Date Fi led AdditiOh Phelps Island Park 1st Division Day Phone No. ,:~3~-- ~'3~79 4. Applicant'(if other than owner): Name Day Phone No. Address 5. Type of Request: 6. 7. 8. (/~V) Variance ( ) ConditiOnal Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. *If.other, specifY: ( .) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit (')*Other Present Zonihg District /~ ~ ~ Existing Use(s) of Property Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or other zoning procedure for this property? /f~ If so, list date(s) of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request· I certify that all .of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plens to'be submitted herewith are true and accurate. ! consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Hound for the ~urpose of inspec[ing, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as ma~ be,~equired by I@.~-~ ~ /~ . Signature of Appl cant Date~/'/~V'- ~''' ' nlng Commission Recommendati-~'n:__. that approval of staff recommendation be granted upon the condition a certified land survey with all structures on property located be submitted bc~^-c ~"'Id'-§ pg ..... t io ~o;,,cd ~,,d Fu, LI,u, [h~[ ~ddl:lon have conforming setbacks to the lakeside and side yards. Vote was all in favor. Date 9-14-87 Council Actlon: Resolution No. Date Request for Zoni.ng Variance Procedure Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilltles, etc. £. Indicate North compass direction Fo Any addltlonal information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. III. Request for a Zonin~ Varlance A. All. Information below, a site.plan, as described in Part '11, and general .application must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Does the present use of. the property'conform to all use regulations for the zone-district In which it is located? Yes (/~0 flo (. )' ! .... If 'nott, specify each ~on-conforming use: Do the existing structures comply with all area bel.ght and bulk regulations for the zone district in which it Is.located? Yes · If "not'~ specify each non-conforming use: Ee Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses .permitted in that zoning disti'ict? (~x,) .Too narrow ( ) Topography ( ) Soil ( ) Too. small ( ) . Drainage ( ) Sub-Surface · (") Too shallow (. ) Shape .. ( ) Other: Specify: . ,<',_-:_-- Was the hardship d~scribed abO~e created by the action of anyone having property.interests in the land after the Zoning Ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ) No (x~) If yes, explain: Fe Was the hardship created by any'other man-made chan~e,~uch as the reloca- tion of a road?:) Yes ( ) No: (x~')- If yes, explain: Are" the conditions of hardship for'which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes .'(~\) No ( ) If no, how:'many other properties are similarly affected? ~hat is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area-bulk regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written explanation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary.) Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or' to the enforcement of this ordinance? Request for Zoning Variance Procedure Attachment De This house was built prior to the ordinance stating homes had to be six feet from the property line. .,. The lot is pie shsped and the hOme is built in the narrow end %1%ich is the northwest corner of the lot. N 2.?,2?' RESOLUTION 87- RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO GRANT A VARIANCE TO TEMPORARILY PLACE A TRAVEL TRAILER AT 6260 DEERWOOD DRIVE, LOT 4, BLOCK 5, WOODCREST; PID#23-117-24 23 0100 P & Z CASE #87-668 WHEREAS, the applicant, Mr. & Mrs. Kent Westberg, has applied for a variance to allow a travel trailer to be used as temporary living quarters; and WHEREAS, the city code 23.709 and the R-1 zoning district provisions do not allow travel trailers as a residence; and WHEREAS, the Plannlng Commlsslon has reviewed the request and does recommend approval with restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Mound, MN. that the variance to allow a temporary travel trailer as a residence until October 26, 1987 to allow the completion of the dwelling being constructed at 6260 Deerwood Drive, PID#23-117-24 23 0100 as shown on Exhibit"A" is hereby granted. CITY OF HOUND J APPLICATION TO PLANNING & ZONING COHHI$SION Case Fee Pa Date Fi led h. Applicant '(if other than owner): Name Day Phone No. " Address 5. Type of Re~C~ Conditional Use Permit ( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review ( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D. ( ) Amendment ( ) Sign Permit ( )*Other t *if other,, specify: Present Zoning District. ~_~-_ Has'an application .ever been made for , it or other zoning procedure for this proper of list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s) Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request. I certify that all of the above statements and th~ statements contained in any required papers or plans .tO be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be. requ?red byAaw. Signa'ture of Applicant , V Planning Commission Recommendation: Grant variance t nable applicants to h~ve a tr,ve[~ trailer on site at 6280 Deerwood Drive as shown in photograph marked Exhibit "A" until October 26, 1987. Vote was all in favor. Date 9-14-87 Council Action: Resolution No. gate R~quest for Zoni.ng Variance Procedure D.o Location of: Signs, easements, underground utilities, et~. E. Indicate North compass direction F. Any addltional information as may reasonably be required by the City Staff and applicable Sections of the Zoning Ordinance. I!1. Request for a Zoning Varlance A. All.information below, a site plan, as described in Part II,'and general "application must be provided before a hearing.will be scheduled. B. Does.the present use of the. property'conform to~al~J use regulations for the zone.district in which it is located? Yes (/~ No. ( )' If '~no", specify each n~n-conforming use: / ~ C® Do the existing structures comply with'all area hei~h~and bulk regulations for the zone district in which it is.located? Ye~ ~) No ( ) If '"no", specify each non-conforming use: D. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses .permit-ted in that zoning district? ( ) .Too narrow ( ) Topography ( ) Soil '( ) Too small ( ) Drainage ( ). Sub-surface .. ( ) .Tgo shallow { ) · Shape~ . !/~ Other: Specify: .. E. ~as the hardship d~scrJbed above created by the action of anyone ~aVjng property in. terests in the land afte~ the Zoning Ordinance ~s adopted? F. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relo~~ tmon of a Yes ( ) No '~. ~ If yes, explain. = , G. Are. the conditions of hardship for which· you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ) No ( ) L)f 'noA,how many other properties are simi larly affected? G What. is the "minimum" mod ificatlon (variance) from the area-bulkOr~egu¢'~,~l: o~nls~-~-~.,~.~. that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and written ~explanatJon... Attach additional . __.sheets_ if ne~essa~y.)//~ {/~ ~ ~E~ (~'~ I. ~ill granting of the variance he'materially detrimental to proper~y in the same zone, Or to ~be enforcement of this ordinance? ': /-' .£-2',:?: 7 N%£ OUTLOT A BILLS ....... SEPTEMBER 22, 1987 Batch 7092 Computer list dated 9/17/87 72,755.19 SuperAmer. ica Mound Medical gasoline Fire Dept exams 864.12 341.75 Total Bills 73,961.06 PPliE ! AP-C02-01 *PURCHASE .,.JOURNAL CITY OF AMOt~ [E,,~IPTION 9/17/87 9/17/87 9.22 AUG OFFICf ~t. Ik-~ 46.38 AUG OFFICE SUPPLIES 34.~7 /~3 OFFICE ~IES 72.~ ~ ~I~ ~I~ ~.~ ~ ~I~ 14.~ ~ ~I~ ~IES 1t.15 ~ ~I~ ~IE~ 14.15 ~ ~I~ ~IES 14.15 ~I~I~ 41i.02 ~-~ 01-4040-2100 01-4090-2100 01-4140-2100 01-41~'21OO 01-4340-2100 01-4280-2100 71-7100-2100 73-7300-2100 78-7800-2100 01-4020-2100 0D41~)-22OO ~/17/87 9/17/87 414.02 68.28 OCT RAI)IO CIINTRRCT 20.45 OCT PAl)lO CONTRACT 9.45 OCT RADIO COlflTd~T 4.68 OCT RADIO CONTRRCT 24.30 OCT RRDIO (IINI'RACT 4,69 OCT RADIO CDHTRACT 14.85 OCT PuqDIO CONTRACT 9.45 DCT RADIO CONTRACT 14.85 DCT RADID CDHTRACT 171.00 ,.R~-CD 01-4280-31r-o0 01-4340-3~o0 01-4190-3~ 01-42'90-3~ 01-4140-3~50 01-4040-3~50 78-7800-3'~-~ Z2-4170-~50 AIR ~ INC VENIIDR TOTAL 17I.OO 9/17/87 9/17/87 125,~ BO~ FEE 126.32 BOND FEE 251.98 dRII.-CD 21-4170-&120 59-/:~<X)-6120 2O4O AHERICAN NATIDNAL BA~K VENDOR TOTAL. 251 9/17/87 W17/87 01-425~0-2310 2O4O BABLER AUTOflOTIVE VENDOR TOTAL ]~0520 9/17/87 9/17/87 1,411.25 OCT LEASE 1,411.25 J?tl.-CO Ba. BOA MINNESDTA ~01000307 VENDER TOTAL 1411.25 9/17/87 9/17/87 OXYGEN JRNL-~ 01-42'90-2250 2O40 BATH<~ COHPANY VENDOR TOTAL 9/17/87 9/17/87 279.99 VO~ 279.~ JRNL-CD 01-2300-0220 2040 BEST TOTAL 27%~) 32.50 45.25 22-4170-3750 71-7100-3750,,3 ~,.~ PAOE 2 AP-C02-01 BLAO(OWIA~ ~ SON B0730 CASH REGISTER SALE9 C0860 ~/17/87 9/17/87 VE]~)~ TOT~ 9117/87 9/17/87 VENDOR TOTAL 9/17/87 9/17/87 VENI)DR. TOTAL 9/17/87 9/17/87 ~ VL:TERII~Ws. RY CITY DF MOUND C0940 VENDOR TOTAL ~/17/87 9117/87 VEND[IR TOTAL 9/17/87 ~/17/87 VENDOR T~TAL COAST TO ~T COMPtJT~ICE INC ClOIO 9/17/87 9/17/87 VENIX)R TOTAL 9/17157 ~/17/87 VENDOR TOTAL 9/17/87 ~/17/87 PURCHASE ,JOURNAL CITY DF ~ 32.50 110.25 110.25 33.02 33.02 15.25 15.25 15.25 17.30 17.30 17.30 · 24.66 20.24 44.90 7.38 16.25 34.97 11.88 .83 40.17 37,06 18.35 12.~ 4.91 184.00 184.00 -907.00 2,096.50 2.09 3,005.59 3005.59 210.&3 210.63 C~ ROCK RIP RAP ,JRM_-CI) REGISTER T/SE ,JR~,L-CO REX EXAM n F~ CORI)S RECYCLE SUPPLIES SAKRETE-WATER SEAL ROD-KEYS ROD-I, OEYS BATTERIES ~ BALLAST STAPLE GUN-BI.LBS ~ P~TS FITTI~ ,JRM.-CD PAGER REPAIR d~q.-CI) 01-421)0-37' L~ 01-42'80-2340 01-4280-2340 2O4O 71-7100-3820 2O4O 01-41~0-4100 2O40 71-7100-3740 2O4O 01-4Y20-4210 71-7100-4210 2O40 01-4320-2200 01-4270-2200 01-4340-2300 01-4290-2300 01-4290-2330 01-4380-22(X) 22-4170-2200 73-7300-2200 73-73(X)-2300 78-78(X)-33(X) 01-40f~-5(X)0 01-40~5-5000 01-40~-220n 22-4170-3200 2O4O PAGE ~-~2-01 PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF ~ AHOUI~T DESCRIPTION COMMUNI~ATIDN AUDITOR VENDOR TOTAL 210.63 C1079 9/17/87 9/17/87 201.22 TE1.EPH(Y~ 322,43 ll=l FI~-ONE 31,98 ~.47 TELEPHONE 120,50 T~KP~ 33,25 TELEPHONE 59,94 835.79 01-414.0-3220 01-4320-3220 01-4095-3220 01-4280-3220 73-7300-3220 78-7800-3220 22-4170-3220 CONTINENTAL T~ ~NON~ VENDOR TOT~ 83J.79 CliO0 9/17/87 9/17/87 16.80 AUG COPI~ ~I~ 16.80 J:Ul.-~ 78-7800-3~'.,0 204O COPY.DUF~LI~TI~PI:~]I~UC~ VE]'8)OR~T~ 16.80 Dl150 9/17/87 9/17/87 9~.00 BLK~ DIRT ~.00 JPJ~.-CD VENIX)R TOTAL 1)1170 9/17/~7 9/17/87 459.75 LEASE TO 10/15 153.25 LEASE TO 10/15 613.00 JRNL-CO 40-6000-3910 01-4320-3910 2O4O I)P{<OTA RAIL INC VENDOR TOTAL 613.00 G1800 9/17/87 9/17/$7 38~.69 REPAIR G,"C' 386.69 ~RNL-CD 01-4280-3810 2O4O C~qRY'S DIESEL SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 386.69 8182O 9117/87 9117187 46.23 ~Y 46.23 ,.RNL-CD 01-4340-2310 2O4O GE]VEPuCd.~I~TI~ VEN1XIR~TAL G1890 9/17/87 9/17/87 33.05 ALU WATER 37.90 AUG ltATER 13.92 AUO ~TER 5.69 AUG WATE)~ 5.69 AUG ~ATER 96.25 JRf, I.-CD 01-4140-4100 01-4090-~"00 01-4280-2200 73-7300-2200 78-7800-~00 2O4O GLENNOOD I~D VENIX)R TOTAL 96.25 9/17/07 9/17/87 19.&5 FILE DEB) 19.&5 J~NL-CO 01-4190-4100 HENN CO DEPT OF ~OFtERTY T VD~ TOTAL 19.~5 9/17/87 9/17/87 87 CONTRACT ~I~S JRfa.-CD 01-4070-4200 2O4O PKE 4 AP-C02-O! VENI)DR INVOICE DUE NO. INVOI~ ~ D~TE I~TE STATUS L2770 9/17/87 ~/17/87 LA~ MIXA C~ATION BI* VE{~ TOTAL L2810 LANOE~IPIqENTI~ L2930 LOWELL'S H2'YSO MACIZEEN EOUIPMENT INC ~3010 PURCHASE jOURNAL CITY OF ~ DESCRIPTION VENSOR TOTAL · 40292.75 2,348.66 FINAL INSTAUJ'ENT 2,348.66 .,.II~',L-CD 2348.&6 9/17/87 9/17/87 VENI)DR TOTAL 9/17/87 9/17/87- VENI)OR TOTAl. 9/17/87 9/17/87 VERIXIR TOTAL MARINA AUTO SUPPLY 1'13040 MASYS CORF~TIDN 15'250 9/17/07 9117/87 VENDOR TOTAL 9/17/87 ~/17/87 VEN1)OR TOTAL · MINhEGASCO VENDOR TOTAL 9/17/87 9/17/87 MN GFDA VENDOR TOTAL PI3470 9/17/87 9/17/B7 VALLEY TESTING LABORATO VENDOR TOTAL N3670 ' 9/17/87 ~/17/87 740.55 L=CONO PLANE 9'37.45 GRAPPLE-CAB ENCL_OEJ_IRE 1,678.00 ,.RtL-CD 1678.00 416.66 ALii PARTS 416,66 ,.[U~-CO 416.6~ 53.96 BLDWER~T~ 53.96 14.20 B.I..B9 157.53 AUG P~TS 213.16 BATTERIES 14.18 AUG PARTS 39~,07 J:U~L-CD 120.00 37.40 WATER ANALYSIS 37.40 JRbL-CD 37,40 173.65 SEPT I)EI)ICATED LINE 173.65 JFN.-CD 01-4020-4130 2O4O 01-4340-50(X) 15-5100-5300 2O4O 01-4290-2310 2O4O 01-4290-2310 2O4O 01-4290-2250 0i-4290-2310 · 22-4170-3820 22-4170-2200 01-40~-3~0 2040 01-4340-3720 71-7100-3720 22-4170-3720 2040 01-4090-4110 2O4O 73-73(X)-3100 204 01-4090-3220 2O4O PAGE ~-C02-01 N W ~ l'rl l:m:~40N~ ~ VE]~ilX]R TOT~ N3710 NAVA~tE HARDWARE N3740 SIGNS N3770 ?/17/87 9/17/87 VEN]X~ TOT~ 9/17/87 9/17/87 VEI~3R TOTAL 9/17/87 9/17/87 NOR~ ST6R I~TERk~qlKS PRO~ VEN~ TOT~ 9/17/87 ~/17/87 NORTHEI~ ST~TFS ~ CO VEN~ TOTAL 03~10 PITNEY BOWES INC P4049 PL~'S, I~ P4050 9/17/87 9/17/87 VENIDR TOTAL 9/17/87 ~/17/8~ VEND~ TOTA. 9/17/87 9/17/87 VENgOR TOT~ 9/17/87 9/17/87 VEN[~ TOTAL PURCHASE JOURNAL CITY OF MOUN~ 173.&5 11.~ ~.~ ~.14 4.~ 1.~ 14.18 ~.~ I~.~ 252.48 252.48 252.48 18%45 45.13 614 4~.~ 174.76 2,085.50 1,163.77 4,559.31 26.78 2~.78 26.78 96.75 96.75 96.75 DESCRIPTI~ PAINT $L~PLI~ WIRE ~ FII'TINit~ [LOVES SI~S-POSTOFFI~ ~[-~ SEAL KIT-LAKE WINO~ JRNL-CD ALE) ELECTRICITY AUG ELECTRICITY AUG ELECTRICITY AUG ELECTRICITY AUG ELECTRICITY AUG ELECTRICITY AUG ELECTRICITY SI~T ELECTRICITY SOD ,JRIt.-CI) 8-9-10 PEST CONll:U]L J~Jl.-CD SLEPT CLEANING dRNL-CI) 01-4340-5110 01-421)0-2200 01-4280-2300 O1 78-7800-23(X) 73-73(X)-22(X) 01-4280-2240 O1-42~0-23~ 2O4O 01-4280-3710 01-4340-3710 01-4320-3710 71-7100-3710 22-4170-3710 ~-~-3710 78-78(X)-3710 01-42'80-3710 01-4340-2350 2O40 01-4320-~10 2O4O 71-7100-3900 2O4O 01-4320-4210 2O4O P4100 81.20 RIBBON-TAPE 01-4140-2100 PAGE 6 ~-~2-01 PURCHASE ,.jOURNAL CITY DF MOUND VENDDR INVDICE DUE HOLD NO. INVDICE 1~ DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT ~SCRIPTIDN 9/17/87 ?117/87 81.20 ,.IRI4.-CD PRECI$IDN BUSI~SS SYSTEM VENDOR TOTAL 81.20 R4220 9/17/87 9/17/07 RBK~ ~T]m/NELSQN 1~. VE]'(I~ TOTAL 212,00 FEIOHT 212.00 J~I.-CO 212.00 71-7100-9600 2O4O 9/17/07 9/17/87 7.50 AUG CAR wcL.ql.r~ 10.50 AUG CAR WASHF. S 59.S0 AUO CAR WASPS 77.50 ,.R~L-CI) 01-4190-3~10 01-4280-3810 01-4140-3810 2040 SPRING P/~ CAR WASH VENDOR TOTAL 9/17/87 9117187 01-2300-0220 2O4O VENDOR TOTAL 8461O 9/17/87 9/17/87 305.06 TIRE~ 305.0~ dPJ~L-CD 78-7800-2300 2O40 SUBI~AN TIRE CO. .VENgDR~T~ ~5.~ T4700 9/17/87 9/17/87 01-4290-2330 2X)40 T & T MAINTENANCE VENDOR TOTAL T4710 TEAH LABDRATORT CHEMICALS T4730 T4940 9/17/87 9/17/87 vE]qDOR TOTAL 9/17/87 9/17/87 ~ TOTAL 9/17/87 9/17/87 VENDOR TOTAL 9/17/87 ~/17/87 166.18 ROUGHllECK SOAP 166.18 ,JgJ~L-CI) 56.75 NOTICES-DRDINANCE$ 4.54 NOTICE-BUDGET 61.2~ &~L-CD 61.29 1,821.93 IMPB) PR 1,B21.~ dBl.-CD 40.96 AU~ TOWELS 16.80 AUG RUGS 78.00 AUG UNIFDRM RENT 15.60 AUG UNIFDRM RENT 23.40 AUG UNIFDP, M RENT 39.00 AUG UNIFC~M RENT 10.40 AUG UNIFDRM RENT 224,16 JR~I.-CO 01-42~-2200 2040 01-4190-3510 01-4020-3510 2O40 78-7800-38(X) 2O4O 01-4290-2250 01-4280-~"(X) 01-42q)0-224C 01-41x20-2240 73-73~-~ 78-7~-~ 01-43~-~ PAll[ '/ AP-C02-OI UNIIOG RENTAL SYSTElq ~ESTON~ FOODS WIDHER INC k~90 Wll I~) FR & SONS Xb-7SO X~OX CDRF13RATIDN Z5870 ZIEGL.E~ INC VENDOR TOTAL ~/17/87 ~/17/87 VENI~mT~ 9/17/87 9/17/87 VENIX]R TOTAL 9/17/87 9/17/87 VENDOR 'TDTAL ~/17/87 9/17/87 VENI)DR TOTAL ~/17/87 9/17/87 VENIX)R TOTAL 9/17/87 9/17/87 VENI)DR TDTAL 9/17/87 9/17/87 VENI)OR TOTAL TDTAL AiL VENI)DRS CZT¥ ~ ~ 224.16 ;)17.30 13.02 518.28 518.28 518.2~ 1.97 8&.03 262.50 262.50 262.S0 2,525.52 2,S25r52 2525.52 3~8.1~ 3f~.I~ 398.19 224.48 224:48 224.48 72,755.1~ DESCRIPTION A/C CIYEdUE~ FDR 1842 TV KIT ~IES ,JRI{.-CD 4841 BARTI_KTT dPJ~.-CI) ,J~I~L-CI) CYLINI)ER-LAT~ J~.-CD 01-4140-3810 01-4290-2310 2O4O 22-4170-3820 01-4020-2200 01-4280-~00 2O4O 73-73(X)-3800 2040 01-4200-2340 2O4O 01-4320-3800 01-42'~0-2310 2O4O September 1, 1987 National 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue NW League Washington, D.C. of 20004 Cities (202) 626-3000 Officers PresiOent Calhy Reynolds Councilwoman-at.Large. Denver. Colorado F~rs! V~ce Pres~c~ent Pamela P Plumb Councilor. Portland. Marne Secon(1 Vice PresiOent Terry Goddard Mayor, Phoenix, Arizona Immediate Past President Henry G. Cisneros Mayor, San Antomo. Texas Executive D~rector Alan Baals To: Mayors of Direct Member Cities ~ From: Alan Beals, Executive Director ~-~ Subject: Designation of voting and Alternate voting Delegates, Annual Congress of Cities, December 12-16, 1987 Las Vegas, Nevada Under the Bylaws of'the National League of Cities, each direct member city is entitled to cast from one to twenty votes, depending upon the city's population, through its designated voting delegate at the Annual Business Meeting of the Congress of Cities. (See table on reverse side.) This meeting will begin at approximately 10:30 a.m., Wednesday, Dec%mber 16, 1987, in the Las Vegas Convention Center. (Please consult your convention program at the Congress of Cities for the exact starting time and place of the meeting.) To be eligible to cast the city's vote, each voting delegate and alternate voting delegate must be designated by the city on the attached form and the form forwarded to NLC's Credentials Committee. NLC's Bylaws expressly prohibit voting by proxy. Thus, an official of the city, properly designated, must be present at the Annual Business Meeting to cast the city's vote or votes. To enable us to get your credentials in order and to provide your voting delegates with National Municipal Policy and Resolutions materials prior to the Congress of Cities, we ask that you return'the W~ITE copy of the completed form to NLC on or before October 12, 1987. A pre-addressed envelope is attached. Upon receipt of these names, NLC will also send each voting and alternate vo~ing delegate a set of instructions on registration and rules governing the conduct of the Annual Business Meeting. To assist your state municipal league in selecting delegates to cast the League vote, please forward the YELLOW copy of the credential form to your state league office and keep the PINK copy for your records. Attachments r hna* WilliamH. Hudnut, III, MayOr' Ind~anapOhs' Indiana ' GeOrge Latin'let' MayOr' · . eles. Cahtorn~a. FlrdL. Harriaon, Mayor, ScotlanclNeck...l~orth,C,a o --~-~ Rouaekia Mayor Savannah Georgm. CherleaRoye~.Mayot Seattle, Pasl Prea~denls. Tom Bradley. M~yor. Los A~ .... --~ W scoria n · Jealie M. Rlttley, Mayor. Newport mews, vlrg,ma · ~u.. r. I ' ~ a~;;videl Co~nc~t Member. Slerhng Heights. M,ch,gan · Wash ng on · George V. VOlnOV,cn,~fy~,..~:.~ M;ril k BerriozJbll Count woman San Anton,o lexas.~u.-~:l,..i.cg....noxOunwody Counc Pres,dent Johnsen, E~ecut,.'e D,~ector. Nodh Dakota Lee ue q ; ncaster'Penns ~van~a.~obOvefstreet Counc~tmember. Eve . g ' ' ' ' -nessee Picus CounC,IMemDe ,LosAngees ~ - ' · ; - -- -:----~-~the~bv ExecutveD.ec'o~ Assoca o ' National League of Cities Annual Congress of Cities Number of Votes - Direct Member Cities Article IV, Section 2 of NLC's Bylaws specifies as follows the number of votes which each member city of the National League of Cities is entitled to cast at the Annual Congress of Cities: City Population Under 50,000 50,000-99,999 100,000-199,999 200,000-299,999 300,000-399,999 400,000-499,999 500,000-599,999 600,000-699,999 700,000'799,999 800,000-899,999 900,000 and above Number of Votes 1 vote 2 votes 4 votes 6 votes 8 votes 10 votes 12 votes 14 votes 16 votes '18 votes 20 votes Note: Member cities are required by the Bylaws to cast unanimous votes. To: 1987 CONGRESS OF CITIES -- LAS VEGAS, NEVADA Chairman, Credentials Committee National League of Cities 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY No. of Votes The official voting delegate and alternates of the City of are as follows: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Adv. Cre. On-Site Cre. Record ID ~ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY VOTING C~RD ISSUED TO Signature VOTING DELEGATE NAME TITLE STREET ADDRESS (pT.~.A-qE DO NOT USE P.O. BOX NUHBERS) CITY STATE ZIP CODE. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Adv. Cre. On-Site Cre. Record ID · FOK OFFICE USE ONLY Adv~ Cr~. On-Site Gte. Record ID ~ NOTE: ALTERNATE VOTING DELEGATES TITLE STREET ADDKESS (DO NOT USE P.O. BOX NO.) '3. CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE TITLE STREET ADDRESS (DO NOT USE P.O. BOX NO.) CITY~ STATE, ZIP CODE SIGNED: TITLE: DATE: Each direct member city is entitled to one voting delegate and two alternate voting delegates. The number of votes vhich can be cast is based on the city's population as determined in the 1980 Census. PLEASE DO NOT FILL IN SHADED AREA. THIS IS FOR NLC OFFICE USE ONLY Please type or print :your city name in the space provided Please type or print the name, title, city, state and zip code of your voting delegate and alternate(s). Please sign the ~HITE form and return to Chairman, Credentials Co~aittee; send the YELLOW copy to your State League Director; and keep PINK copy for your records. August 28, 1987 National 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue NW League Washington, D.C. of 20004 Cities (202) 626-3000 Officers Cathy Reynolcts Councdwomen*at-Large. Denver. Color a.flo F~rst V~ce Pres~Cient Pamela P Plumb Councilor. PorllancL Ma,ne Second V~ce P~'esrOent Terry Gocl0a~cl Mayor, Phoemx, Arizona Imme(1iale Past Presiclen~ Henry G. C~sneros Mayor~ San Antonio, Texas Alan Beats To: Mayors and Managers of Direct Member Cities " Executive Directors of State Municipal Leagues Alan Beals, Executive Director ~~/ Proposed Amendments to National Municipal Policy and Separate Resolutions, Annual Congress of Cities, Las Vegas, Nevada, December 12-16, 1987 From: Subject: MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1987 The Policy Committees of the National League of Cities will meet from 9:00 a.m. until 4:30 p.m., Sunday, December 13, 1987 in the Las Vegas Convention Center. NLC's Resolutions Committee will meet at 1:00 p.m., Monday, December 14, also in the Las Vegas Convention Center. Member cities and state municipal leagues are invited to submit policy proposals for consideration by these committees. DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION All adgance proposals to amend the NLC National Municipal Policy and advance separate resolutions must be submitted to: .. Chairman', Resolutions Committee National League of Cities 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 To assure sponsors full rights to the NLC policy process, and to allow for distribution of advance proposals to NLC's membership, proposals must be received in NLC's office by the end of business on Monday, October 12, 1987. PlalPrlak~e~fa:TemBredtp I ly .... Mayor LosAngeles Cahforma. FerdL Harriaon, Mayor, Scot andNeck NorthCarohna. WllhamH' ' Hudnut III Mayor tn0~ana ohs In0~ana G' r i S au Mnnesola. Henr~W Miler Mayor MIwau~ee Wsconsm. JessieM Rlttley Mayor NewDorl~ew~ V,,n,n,~ J~h.~e.~...u;. ;~ ' c ' ~ ~ , --. · eO geLet mar, Mayor. , . , · ., . . ....... ~._... ............ ., ,.,ayes, ~avanna,,, ueorg,a. ~narle~ Roye~ Mayor, Seattle. a?,ngt~n · George V. Voinovlch, Mayor, Clevelan0, Ohio. Dir~for~: Sidney J. Barthelemy, Mayor. New Orleans. Louisiana · Jos~ G Benav des, Counc MemDe~ Star ng He~ has M ch gan · A. Glmer, Mayor. Pulask,.Tennessee. W. Willo~Goode;Mayo~ Phrladetph~a Pennsvlva~a.~ ArthurGrav ~*~..~. ~,~ ..... ~,. v . .. . Y.. - , .G o ga-Stlcly Johnson, ExeCuhve D~rector, North Dakota Leaoue et Crt,es · Joseph A. Lille, Mayo. NorlO k. Vrrgtn~a · Roland A Luedtke, Mayor L~ncoln NeDraska · Charles Lons Chairman Boar0 I Selec me~ Ar ng off Massachusetts Arthur E ~orr I Mayo Lancas er Pen~sy van a Bob Overltreet Count memoir Eve e t Wash ~ ton re P Y o ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . , ', g '~ Ce etlrlen, Mayor. P,e~r~,SouthDa'kot~.Joy~ ~iC~l, Council Member Los Angeles, Caldom~a. Dina G. Rinehart, Mayor Co u~e~s. Omo. Sloven C. Robertl. AiOe~man, SI Lou~s, M,ssour~. Jell h A Swill E~ecut ye D~ecto~ Tennessee Page Two August 28, 1987 FO~4 OF SUBMISSION National Municipal Policy for 1987, copies of which have been previously furnished to all member cities and state leagues, is the .comprehensive policy statement of the National League of Cities. It is subject to amendment at each annual business meeting of NLC. Proposed changes to the 1987 National Municipal Policy should, be submitted in the form specified on the. attached insert. Separate resolutions are short term expressions of the membership of the National League of Cities, typically endorsing or opposing specific Congressional bills or current Presidential positions. They do not become part of the continuing National Municipal Policy document but are transmitted to appropriate federal officials immediately following the annual meeting. Such resolutions auto- matically die at the end of the calendar year following the COngress of Cities at which they were passed. The format to be followed for each resolution submitted is specified on the reverse side of the attached insert. Each policy amendment or resolution should be accompanied by a. one- page explanation which describes the nature, of the problem or concern from the municipal persPective and discusses the proposed action which should be taken to address the problem. The one-page explanation will be distributed along with the proposed amendments or resolutions to all Policy Committee members. A blank form is enclosed, feel .free to xerox as many copies as necessary. Questions on the form or germaneness of policy proposals or separate resolutions will be referred to a subcommittee of NLC's Advisory Council, appointed for that purpose by the NLC President, for recommendation to NLC's Resolutions Committee. The criteria used by the subcommittee in making their recommendations appear below.under the subtitle "Guidelines ~or Preparation of Policy Proposals· ,, PROCEDURES FOR CONSIDERATION OF ADVANCE SUBMISSIONS All proposals received in NLC's offices before the end of business on Monday, October 12, 1987 will be assigned to a policy committee for consideration when the committees meet on Sunday, December 12th in Las Vegas. Members submitting proposals will be notified of the committee to which their proposal is referred and the time and place of the committee meeting. Sponsors of proposals or their representatives will be expected to appear before the full committee to present and discuss their proposal. If the policy committee accepts the proposal, it will be submitted to the Resolutions Committee by the policy committee chairperson as part of his or her colmmittee report. 1987 CONGRESS OF CITIES LAS VEGAS. NEVADA EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED POLICY AMENDMENT/RESOLUTION Title of Resolution or Amendment: Submitted b~ Contact: Date: Title: ******* PIF~SE TYPE ********** ( S.~IPLE NMP ' AMENDMENTS) · ..: t.i~ ..~: : Energy, En 4ronment & NatUr Resourc 2.04 SOLID WAST~ AND HAZARDOUS WASTE - :- . ,.-- B. Hazardous Wastes and Materials Management 3. Policies- m. smaller Generator Exemption (Ep~_~h~d-attempt-te-dete~m~ne-wha~ e~emp~e~-~m-ReRA-~e~at~en~ana-wheehe~ e~e.%~y-e~empeea'~ene~ee~s-e~e-P~ePe~½y Congress should enact lewisla~ci°n which would substantially reduce the existin% exemption for small generators of hazar- dous waste from the current level of 1000 kilograms of waste per month. EPA ~hould develo~ and ~romulgate regulations ~overning the hazardous waste management practices of small ~enerators as soon after enactment as possible. EPA should provide technical assistance to states and local governments con- sidering regulating federally exempted hazardous waste generators. words to be deleted: strike thru text and enclose in parenthesis words to be added: underline text ~ I text to remain 1 unchanged (Sample Resolution) PROPOSED RESOLUTION ':" ~ ~. VHE~, the United States Navy has *a proposal to diSPOse of uP to 100 defueled VHERFAS, deco~issiOned nuclear su~arines during the ~xc three decades; aaa one of the options is for OCean disposal o~ these subm~ines; and ~S~ ~he oceans are a food SOurce for much of ~he ~orld's POpula~ion~ con~a~na~ion of ~he f~d chain COuld have ~ar reaching and NO~, T~FO~* BE IT ~SOL~D 1972 b~ on all ocean ' ' imPlica:i°nsI ~he NatiOnal League of Ci~ies Should Suppor~ the dumpin~ of nuclear rashes un:il i~ can be demon- stra~ed ~ha~ ~he Sa~e~y and efficiency of Ocean disPOsal Of~ers less harm ~o human health and ~he environmen~ ~han O~her practical al~erna_ :ire me,hods of disposal. Submitted by: Colorado Municipal League Date Receivedr (LEAVE BLANK) Referred to: (LEAVE BLANK) · Margins Should be . one inch on all sides. · Courier 12 typing element. · Under the Words "Proposed Res°Iuti°n", type title. · Hake Sure to type in the resolution, s sponsor (individual, City or state municipal league). Page Three AugUSt 9.8, 1987 roposal, the fact that the committee ~ the P .~ ~a was distributed .to , october '~ If the policy received by Monday to aPPeel the policy committee on Monday, proposal was members in advance permits the sponSOr action to the Resolutions committee during their meeting December 14. NOT SUBMITTED BY MONDAY, pROCEDURE FOR cONSIDERATION OF pRoPOSALS se pax == ~~et2 da oCTOBER 12 .... ~tee may off. er _.a. dmentS to · diction o.r re_l_a~e,~dn ~ .~mber o~ a pol~..c..~oj~i~ commit.te.e_~.s.i~ttee meeting u, ~--- ~ions dur~ng ~ from December 13. policy committees are composed of from three to seven members each state nominated by the state municipal league- Member cities and state leagues are urged to work with their state committee delegation if they are unable to submit their proposal prior to the bet 19. deadline. - ic committee Monday, 0ctO ..... ~ider only p°l_.~4ciDal leag.Ues.__= . . ittee w~l~ ~_~.."? and state mu~ The Res°lu_t_~°~noSsa~rom me.mb_er~ta~e, SOctobe.r 12, anu fedoraS, p.~u.~,= offices Dy ~'~.'~ ~embers. re~eiv, ed.~.n.~e~olutions comm.luu== -, of indivlou~ ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING .... ~ of a member citY_ o~r state league may separate resolution _~-~i~ied v°ting.oe-.1-e?~=~l~ amendme-n,t~n~ on wednesday, Any u=~.._~4~na1 Mun~C.~ ~.~,~l BusinesS er a m~u*-' off ~he Annu=~ ~ ---~ls not submitted t~°o~he ~ 7- However,. ~Y..~.= committee _:din for cons~Oerm=*~ an propu== or the Boa=a . cembeZ ~6, 198 - the Res°lUU~_~''~ d to the. P~.~ to the De . ateS bM . . r~sente ~ouz F~- . . voting deleg_ et~t~on_P than 1/l .... must be by P .... no later r consideration at Direcuu~=,'"~.,:~ness Meetlnw .... ~nted flor ~1o~ -~-eive a majOr ZtY the Ann~ai o~--- ~m~,. To De au~r ~:~ion ~st ==~ . _ _~ · 's Call to u~inm, such a Pe=~sent and votxng- m=et~ng..al BusinesS ~'~==h=~n~ delegates P~= --rate the An~u ~ certified vo~ ~ --d all sep= vote ot az~ .. _~ ~uni~=~'o~ delegates oweve resolutlo~=, - for passage- present and voting · , * * · OR p~p~TION OF poLICY pRoPOSeS GuIDELI~S F - ' d the ~ollowing guidelines ~or poliCY P cities: Page Four Augus% 28, 1987 Whether acted upon as amendments to National Municipal Policy or separate resolutions, policy proposals a. shall--in their subject matter--concern shared policy and program needs, issues or problems of the nation's municipal governments; b. shall be concerned with federal government policy, and therefore, be addressed to federal government policy- makers; c. shall neither contradict nor duplicate existing NLC policy statements, except where they are intended to amend or repeal such policy; d. shall not compromise the independence or integrity of individual member cities to pursue any course of action adopted by appropriate municipal policy-making bodies; and ® e e. shall not compromise the budget-making~ program determining or priority setting role of the NLC Board. As basic, continuing organizational policy positions, proposed amendments to National Municipal Policy should specify city positions on federal roles and responsibilities, policy goals, purposes, principles and/or program characteristics within the broad subject areas covered by existing policy or authorized by Board action. They should not refer to proposed Congressional legislation by title, sponsor's name or bill number. Non-continuing separate resolutions should be restricted to those action-specific items of short term utility addressed to the Congress or the President. In separate resolutions, specific reference to proposed legislation ~y title, sponsor's name or bill number is appropriate. Separate resolutions shall be considered only when they do not conflict, with or contradict existing National Municipal Policy. Further information regarding the NLC policy process may be secured prior to the Congress of Cities from: Barbara Harsha, Director Policy Development National League of Cities 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 626-3030 CITY OF MOUND 1987 BUDGET REPORT AUGUST 1987 66.1 ~; of Yea r BUDGET AUGUST .AEVENUE YTD PER CENT REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED...L. GENERAL FUND Taxes I ntergovernmenta 1 Bus i ness..Ll censes Non-Bus lness Licenses and Pemits General Gov't Charges. ' Court Fines Charges to Other Oepa r tment s Other Revenue TOTAL REVENUE LIQUOR FUND WATER FUND SEWER FUND $975,893 771,057 13,000 108,100' 33,300 94,000 20,870 57,500 $2,073,720 $755,000 '$300,000 $565,000 --- 485,755 490,138 1,782 372,199 398,858 2,793 9,029 3,971 9,266 112,342. (4,242) 1~079 16,723 16,577 5,153 54,395 .39,605 1,293 9,597 11,273 2,073 13,481 44~019 23,439 1,073,521 1,000,199 71,458 512,692 242,308 31,015 204,566 95,434 47,532 379,044 185,956 49~8 48.3 69.5 103.9 50.2 57.9 46.0 23.4 51.8 67.9 68.2 67.1 BUDGET CITY dF MOUND 1287'BUDGET REPOflT EXPENDITURES AUGUST 1987 AUGUST EXPENSE YTD EXPENSE 66.7~ of UNEN- CUMBERED EXPENSE Yea r PER'CENT EXPENDED GENERAL FUND Councll City'Manager/Clerk E]ections Assessing Finance .. Legal Cable TV Recycling Police Civil Defense Plennlng/Inspectlor Streets Shop & Store City Property Parks Commons Docks Hound C|ty Days Contingencies Transfers Computer $50,460 . 111,430 500 46,170 134,010 83,750 6,490 ]8,320 626,130 2,300 104,6OO 390,730 50,810 85,320 144,760 54,1OO 3,500 1'7,140 143,200 6,638 8,492 537 846 9. 564 9,800 159 1,076 38,288 6,534 25,521 3,677 2,387 16,416 801 87O 9,767 1,.489 37,889 71,224 744 5,355 85,692 43,949 5,620 10,652 383,602' 449 74,206 233,357 33,153 45,O94 102,940 41,833 3,485 1,404 78,133 .. 34,220 12,571 40,206 (244) 40,815 48,3~8 39,801 87O 7,668 242,528 1,851 30,394 157,373. 17,657 40,226 41,820 12,267 15 15,736 65,067 .(34,220). 75.1 63.9 148.~ 11.6 63.9 52.5 86.6 61.3 19.5 70.9 59.7 65.2 '52.9 71.1 77.3 99.6 8.2 54.6 GENERAL FUND TOTAL ~2,073,720 142,862 780~719 62.4 Area Fi re Service Fund Liquor Fund Water Fund' Sewer Fund $223,940 149,340 296,910 693,150 7,793 10,327 '. 15,334 48,998 160,206 97,031 18o,o12 39o,322 63,734 52,309 116,898 302,828 71.5 65.9 60.6 56..3 MINUTES OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 10, 1987 Present were: Chair Nancy Clough; Conmmissioners Shirley Andersen, Linda Panetta, and Lowell Swenson; Council Representative Phyllis Jessen; City Manager Ed Shukle; Dock Inspector Dell Rudolph; Sun~uer Park Recreational Director Kelli Meyer and Secretary Marge Stutsman. Absent and excused were Corauissioners Marilyn Byrnes(1E) and Andy Gearhart(2E); also absent were Coranissioners Cathy Bailey(1U), Cheryl Burns(1U) and Delores Maas(1E & 1U). The following interested person was also present: Dick Olewm. MINUTES The minutes of the Park Con~uission meeting of August 13, 1987 were presented f6r consideration. Jessenmoved and Swenson seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the August 13th Park Con~nission meeting as presented. The vote was all in favor. Review of 1988 Dock Application & LMCD Fee Increase & Commercial Dock Report Dell Rudolph, Dock Inspector, reported the only difference on this application from what Commission has discussed before is the change in the LMCDdock rules; before they charged a flat $10.00 per dock and now it is on per footage of boats. The cost for 400 docks has been $4,000 and Dell went back and counted 567 boats which will cost about double based on the footage of the boats. He noted that, until after the first inspection of the year, it will be difficult to know what boats are really there and how much to send in to LMCD. The Co~mission discussed the matter and it was questioned if City couldn't rebut because it is too much administrative responsibility. Swenson brought up that boaters' using public access come in free'and actually use the lake more than some of the boats that are kept on the lake which is very unfair. Dell noted we are only category charged on this basis/other conmmercial docks pay on the basis of footage of slips. It %fas also mentioned that City pays for the docks plus sup- porting the LMCD. It was suggested that-a letter be drafted to be signed by the Park Con~uission and council Representative will set up a time next week to work on letter of rebut with staff. Dell Rudolph's report on Commercial and Multiple Docks was also reviewed. Request to do a Cemetery planting Dick Olexa of 6609 Bartlett Boulevard has requested to do a planting on portion of two 'corner lots (unusable as grave sites) shown on drawing. The planting will include tree with flowers to side and front so as to not encroach on driveway/ there is a similar planting on other side of this driveway. The Commission dis- cussed the ~equest briefly and thanked Mr. Olexa. Clough moved and Panetta seconded a motion to recommend approval of the request to do the planting as shown on drawing. The vote was unanimously in favor. This will be on the Council agenda September 22, 1987. Letter reqardinqDock site $ 43942 The Dock Inspector explained that he has sent Mr. Empson 3 notices for non-compliance such as failure to remove dock sections, boat lift, etc. from the Commons and also weeds and debris bY dock site are unsightly and now, he is requesting the Commission. to authorize his sending the enclosed letter stating that the Park Commission will with, hold. 1988 dock permit until Mr. Empson assures them in writing that this Will not occur again. The Commission discussed and suggested changing word "permit" to ,,application". Park Commission Minutes September 10, 1987 - Page 2 Swenson moved and Clough seconded a motion for approval of the sending of letter with change of word to "application" to Mr. Empson regarding Dock site ~ 43942. The vote was unanimously in favor. Summer Park ProqramReport by Kelli Meyer, Directo~ Kelli gave some background on herself such as that she worked 2 years ago in the parks under Jackie Meyer; she has been going to the University of Minnesota and is completing course in Elementary Education. The Recreation Program was held in the parks from June 15th to July 31st (6 weeks duration) from 9 to 11:30 a.m. There were supervised games, special events and walks to the beach. Attendance was 124 every day. Most noteable event was the track meet on June 17th with 200+ kids- participating (all participants got ribbons). Another big event was the trip to Minnesota Zoo. Record number of 147 went which took 2 bus loads plus they had to hire a van. She noted the con~nunity has great interest and there is a tremendous potential for growth of the program. She stated there are also some problems; some of which seemed to be lack of funds to pay salaries and fees for the training conference for her staff (fee was flat fee of $80 for 8 hoUr session for group of about 18 plus herself); she also stated an increase in budget for supplies ~s needed as they are deteriorating & also disappearing from the Depot building; she also felt that the program should be expanded to include Tyrone Park for safety reasons (children would not have to cross Wilshire) and also because of over- crowding at Swenson Park. In response to a question on what the 8 hour training session included, she stated arts and crafts, safety procedures and so forth and that she was unable to give the 15 supervisors plus 3 substitutes, the same amount of training. She concluded her report, submitted her resignation and keys. The Commission discussed the report and expressed some concerns about the program. Commissioner Panetta reported an incident where one of the supervisors took children in his car around the block and another incident where information on whom should be contacted in case of an accident was not requested with enrollment. Council Representative Jessen asked that some 'poiicies be established including requiring reports, etc. on the program. The Dock Inspector reported that all except 11 docks went in and this number seems to get less each year. The 11 were not put in for good reasons. Council Representative Jessen questioned if A1 and Alma's buoys are in closer to the beach than before. She reported that the City Council had denied Mr. Lister's request to. purchase land as they, too, concur with the Park Commission that it was considered park land. The City Manager ~eviewed the 1988 Park budget which %~s distributed at this meeting. · He noted that the City Council will be holding budget hearings this next Tuesday and' Wednesday evenings and possibly the following Monday; the budget has to be adopted by October 10th. He noted that the referendum on the Public Works facility will be on September 29, 1987 and urged everyone to vote as it is really needed. The Com- mission discussed some of their concerns on storage sites. Chair Clough reported 4 commissioners had attended tour to Minnetonka Boat Works last month. Theirdevelopment took 9 months; Dk~ and L~D were really cooperative; there ~s no Park Dedication etc. by them to the City; only normal fees; it is a private venture. They did suggest that in the development of the Lost Lake area, whole 42~ acres should be looked at as a whole and how it ~ill affect the ~,'hole of City of Mound. The Commission discussed the pros and cons of whether area could be opened for. more boat traffic and the City Manager e×~lained what City is looking 73- Park Commission Minutes September 10, 1987 - Page 3 for on the LostLake proposal. He noted that the City has received one proposal which the Council will be studying at their next meetings. He mentioned the small size of the area for development has limited the number of proposals. ADJOURNMENT Swenson moved and Clough seconded a motion to adjourn at 9:30 p.m. all. in favor, so meeting ~as adjourned. The vote w~s LAKE 402 EAST LAKE STREET MINNETONKA CONSERVATION WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 5539'1 September 11, 1987 DISTRICT TELEPHONE 6121473-7033 FRANK MIXA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD MEMBERS Robert Rascop, Chairman Shorewood JoEIlen Hurr, Vice Chairman Orono Mark Westlund, Secretary Wayzata Jon Elam. Treasurer Mound Marvin Bjorlin Tonka Bay Jan Boswinkel Uinr~etonka Beach Robert Tipton Brown Greenwood Walley Clevenger Uinnestrista Richard J. Garwood Deephaven Ron Kraemer Spring Park Robert K. Pillsbury ainnetonka Robert E. Slocum Woodland Spargo Victoria H. Weisser Excelsior James L. Merthan Minnetonka Bass Club 601 Esther Lane Woodbury, MN 55125 Dear Mr. Merthan: The LMCD has approved your renewal application for the bass fishing tournament on June 4, 1988 at Cooks Bay, subject to the following: 1. Compliance with the District's speed limits (40/day 20/ night). ' 2. The District's noise limits must be complied with (84dbA at 50 feet, or 82dbA on boats or motors built after 1-1-82). 3. All temporary signs for the event must be removed .within seven days after the event. 4. Boat registration numbers must be affixed to all boats, according to statute. 5. Permit is subject to the City of Mound (at weigh-in) for cleanup, parking, etc. 6. The event is under the jurisdicition of the Sheriff's Water Pa'trol. Your cooperation in our "Save the Lake" program is appreciated. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Executive Director enc: application c/enc: Sheriff's Water Patrol City of Mound/ LMCD Inspector c: Tom Reese Lake Use Chairman Robert Pillsbury RECI~IVEO SEP Lake Minnetonka Conservation District LMCD Fee ~ V/~z~z ~ Because this form is to be copied, please use black ink or type.! (Name of applican~t~ SPECIAL EVENT APPLICATION: SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT (Address) (Responsible party, if different from applicant) (Phone number) (Phone number) If no answer, call (Address) 1. Describe'event ~ 55 ~ L.M.C.D. Area(s) _~~/~ ~_~~-- Number(s) 2. Area of use: Will area of special event involve use of are~o~tside of applicant's dock use or mooring area (attach map if needed)? 3. Describe affect on Lake water quality 4. Will event require speed in excess of L~~de or suspension of Rules of the Road? ~/O If so, describe 5. Will temporary'buoys· be necessary? /~/~ If so, locate (attach map if necessary)= 6, Could this event be conducted on shore or other waters? 7. Will event create a safety or navigational hazard? If so, explain: 8. Will event require Water Patrol or other enforcement supervision? ~/~ 9. Will event create additional noise on the Lake? /¥~ If so, describe= 10. Will event restrict general public use? ~/~ If so, describe= 11. Is event open to the public? Y~ 12. Will time or place of event affect boating density or intensity o~ke Use?~ If so, describe and locate areas of potential conflict Special Event Permit application Page 2 (Name 13. Do you have approvals from the following: Water Patrol( )Yes ( Other law-enforcement a~enc~s( )Yes ( )N~ /'~Municipality( )Yes ( )No; Other permits ~ ~ ~y~/¢ /~A~z~.~ 14. Public liability insurance: Amount$.~~J) Compan 15. Schedule of event(s) - attach additional~ sheets if necessary: a) Date, time & location of event(s~~~ b) T-~[s) ~watercraft m c) Number(s) of watercraft for eack_~pe ~ ~ d) All watercraft have current Minnesota registrations: ( ~es ( )No; if not explain e) Supersision provided ~nd how ~en~i, fied ~__~ f~f~_/.~/~ 16. Fees: Single event ($50) ................. $ ~. Multiple event ($100) ......................................... Or, if submitted within 60 days of the event: Single event ($100) Ail applications: Permit deposit ...... <~.~. ~. ~O~/~- ......... Total fee attached $ ~--~. I certify that the information provided herein and the attachments hereto are true and correct statements, and I understand that any permit granted may be revoked by the District for violation of the LMCD Code. I agree to reimburse the District for any advertising-sign removal, legal, surveying, engineering, inspection, maintenance or other expenses incurred by the District in excess of the amount of deposit. I consent to permitting officers and agents of the District to enter the premises in- volved at all reasonable times to investigate and to determine whether the Code of the District is being complied with. Authorized Date Please return this application and attachments to: 7/85 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 402 E. Lake Street Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Phone: (612) 473-7033 PROGRAM HOTEL 8:00-9:00 a.m. 9:00-9:15 a.m. 9:15-10:15 a.m. 10:15-10:30 a.m. 10:30-11:30 a.m. 11:30- 12:00 noon 12:00-1:30 p.m. 1:30-2:45 p.m. 2:45-3:00 p.m'. 3:00-4:00 p.m. 4:00-4:30 p.m. Registration Welcome Seminar Overview: Important Trends Dr. James Svara, University of North Carolina, Greensboro What's the Fuss? Why Worry about Council-Manager Relations? Speakers: one elected and one appointed official from the region Break What's New in Research? -Changing Roles and Responsibilities Speaker: Dr. James Svara, University of North Carolina, Greensboro Summing It Up Panel discussion with morning speakers Lu~ch How Do You Know When You're Successful9. Quantitative and Qualitative Productivity Measures Speaker: Bill Evans, Consult- ant, Cresap McCormick, and Paget, Washington, D.C. Break Productivity Measures continued Summing It Up Panel discussion with all speakers You should make your own hotel reservations at the site you select by calling or writing one of the hotels listed here. Ask for the special rate for the NLC/ICMA Council-Manager Relations Seminar. The deadline for room reservations is August 23, 1987. After that date, requests for lodging will be filled on a space available basis. If you plan to arrive after 6 p.m., you must guarantee your reservations by providing credit card information or by sending a check for one night's lodging in advance. September 24-Louisville, Kentucky* The Gait House East Fourth Street at River Louisville, Kentucky 40202 (502) 589-3300 Single room $59.50/Doublc room $69.50 September 26--Alexandria, Virginia* Radisson Mark Plaza Hotel ' 5000 Seminary Road Alexandria, Virginia 22311 (703) 845-1010 Single room $80/Double room $100 /~"~eptember 28--Minneapolis, Minnesota Hyatt Regency Minneapolis 1300 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 (612) 370-1234 Single or double room $75 September 30--Denver, Colorado Marriott City Center 1701 California Street Denver, ColOrado 80202 (303) 297--1300 or (800) 228-9290 (toll free) Single or double room $80 *These sessions will preceed annual conventions of the Kentucky Municipal League and the Virginia Municipal League. 27; 0 MAYOR'S TASK FORCE ON CHEMICAL ABUSE .Mound, Minnesota September 22, 1987 Steve Smith, Mayor June Fitz, Chairperson Len Harrell, Chief of Police Dr. William Peglow Bonnie Engle Cathy Bailey Kathy Jones Mike Barlow Florence Worner III. Addendums: General Statement of the Drug Abuse Problem Considerations of the Cost of Chemical Abuse in the Community Suggested Solutions: Chemical Abuse 1. Report: Chief Len Harrell 2. Report: Dr. William Peglow General Statement of the Chemical Abuse Problem A. Drugs and Teens 1. There is a high incidence of alcohol u'se and abuse with Mound teenagers. 2. During this past school year, twelve students were referred for chemical abuse evaluations. Six entered and three completed successfully. Drugs are readily available in Mound. Current trends in "hard" drugs of choice indicate use of cocaine and LSD. LSD's popularity is not stable, it goes in and out of vogue quite readily. Marijuana continues to be widely used. Students who are caught in school using or selling chemicals tend to be the more occasional abuser. Unfortunately, those with the more serious problems are often too "sophisticated" to get caught in school. The high school and middle school have the most serious drug and alcohol problems. The level of awareness regarding chemical substance abuse needs to be increased. School officials and parents have not encouraged enough suitable educational programs. B. Family Issues Mound ha's a disproportionate number of dysfunctional families. There is a high incidence of alcohol use and abuse in the families of the Mound area. me Community "prevention programs" have been difficult to initiate. Many families do not feel a strong bond of community spirit due in part to geographical separations as well as economic differences. There is a lack of leadership to give direction to on-going programs. 3. Hennepin County Services are too far away to be effectively utilized. The closest Hennepin County Resources Center is Ridgedale. Particularily in times of highly stressful family conflict, social services are perceived as being too far away. High risk families often feel isolated and denied access to beneficial programs. Consequently, families turn to the police in family crisis situations. Police are n~eded to go'beyond police duties and function in role of social service workers. There is a dependency upon the police to act as counselors and to transport in crisis situations to county resource and emergency centers. C. Law Enforcement 1. Police involvement with the schools has been limited. Confusion over police jurisdiction as well as limited manpower has created difficulties in enforcement. This stems from the fact that two schools are in Minnetrista, and two are in Mound. Students may reside in either Mound, Minnetrista or Orono. 3. Of the 165 formal complaints last year, 95% entailed a police trip to Ridgedale, or downtown courts, or attorney's offices. 4. There are at least two trips a month to detox detention centers with offenders. me Many family crisis situations require an intervention and necessitates a trip to south Minneapolis to place a child in a secure facility or "The Bridge." D. Lack of Prevention Programs Chemical abuse programs deal with existing abuse issues. Prevention programs are more nebulas and less directly cause-effect oriented. Prevention "results" are not easily measured and, therefore, money is not often allocated towards preventions needs...which is crucial to the future of our community. Our community "denial" of chemical abuse hinders the involvement of volunteers to work towards creating a positive "drug-free" environment. 3. There is a lack of information dissemination. Drug, alcohol, and prescription chemical abuse does not limit itself to youth involvement. Even seniors are abusers in statistically predict- able numbers. E. Health Care Costs: A study by one Mound physician in a 1986 six-week period saw 65 persons hospitalized. 16 of those hospitalized, (24%) had a significant medical illness resulting from chemical overuse or abuse as a primary reason or a substantial contributing factor.. - 2 persons suffered from alcoholic heart disease (1 expired) - 2 persons had alcohol withdrawal syndrome (1 with seizures; 1 "DT's") - 3 persons had alcoholic liver disease - 1 cirrhosis (expired) - 2 alcohol hepatitis - 2 overdoses (both multiple sedative-hypnotic drugs such as valium and meprobamate) both recovered - 1 hip fracture while intoxicated with alcohol - 3 elderly persons were hospitalized for medical illness related to dementia (senility) where alcohol was thought to be the primary contributing factor to the dementia (either actively drinking now or had stopped heavy drinking in the past) NOTE: Many additional problems were noted, predominantlyalcohol related which contribute to mobidity (illness) or complicate medical care, such as alcohol related degeneration of the nerves of the limbs (polyneuropathy) resulting in impaired ga%t, falls, injuries alcohol induced stomach injury resulting ~n hemorrage, often'times requiring blood transfusions. III. me On an outpatient basis, one physician saw 104 persons in a two-week period. 19 of those seen, 18% had problems requiring or causing them to seek medical care caused by (entirely or in part) chemical injury, predominantly alcohol. NOTE: The above medical statistics are informal and deal with a practice heavily weighted towards older persons with chronic or acute medical illness. Figures do not include medical problems such as surgery or trauma. Conse- quently, there is little or no mention of the injuries and/or trauma resulting from alcohol or drug abuse. Falls, fractures, fights, auto acci- dents, etc. would increase the percentage of drug-related medical problems and care costs. CONCLUSION: The cost to the community is high as can be seen in the above case reviews. Law enforcement costs are high. Medical costs to indivduals and to the community are high. Emotional problems and the loss of the community well-being is a serious consideration, as this can affect the business climate, the community pride, the economic future of Mound. Educational costs rise. The cost to our community is seriously affected by chemical abuse. Suggested Solutions: Chemical Abuse Community 1. Change attitudes of complacency and denial. 2. Accept responsibility and the "Challenge to Change." 3. Take time to be aware of the problem and to be educated to solutions. Finally, Mound citizens must become involved in the solutions. Our citizens must commit to contributing time, money, facilities. They must volunteer to assist rehabilitation and educational efforts. They must encourage membership in groups such as AA, Alateen, etc. Be Mound citizens must enlist as activists in a coordinated anti-drug campaign. We must invite neighboring communities to join us in our efforts. Churches, volunteer organizations, our school board, our council, our police force, our commercial business people, everyone m~st join in. our campagin, "Mound Says No to Drugs." Our newspapers are asked to publish information and human interest stories regarding the cost of drug abuse. The media must join our campaign. Ye Senior citizens peer support groups should be established. Volunteers should be recruited to work with our Seniors and their children as problems arise. Seniors should have speakers and educational meetings addressing the problem of chemical abuse and the need for disposal of old medications with their peers, children, and families. 8. The formation of cross-community committees should be fostered; each with the common goal of eliminating chemical abuse in Mound. o A Volunteer Bureau must be established, possibly with accountability to the council. A capable individual must be found to coordinate these efforts. Sponsorship can come from the council, volunteer organizations and businesses. 10. An information hot-line would service young people, senior citizens and parents. No strings should be attached to the hot-line .calls. Infor- mation could be disseminated regarding prescription drugs, places to seek help, organizations available; e.g. AA, Alanon, etc. B. Churches and Service Organizations Churches must join together in providing meeting places for young people and their families. They must provide counseling and financial aid to families in trouble. They must provide a corps of volunteers to be available on a one-to-one basis. me Volunteer organizations, services clubs, and o~r business people must offer financial aid, scholarships, service awards which reward the "straights." They could sponsor school organizations. They must pro- vide active volunteers. Be Organized groups in Mound should sponsor a Speaker's Bureau with sPeakers addressing the educational aspects of chemical abuse, enlisting the help of still others. Churches, service groups, businesses, media, are asked to participate in community programs, to advertise our Anti-drug Campaign in every way possible. e It is essential that a directory be printed giving information regarding all of the social services available. This could be sponsored by an organization or funded by advertising. There is a need for more pre-intervention programs, lectures, seminars, and community events focusing on the elimination of drugs. Programs and events need to be supported by churches, clubs, organizations, local businesses and willing individual volunteers. Scho61s There must be a conscious coordinated effort to plan educational drug prevention curriculum beginning in the grade school and extending through- out high school. The members of the task force agree that the most important emphasis should be at the grade school level. The PTA must support inclusion of special drug programs and drug curriculum in our schools. 2. "Straight" students should be supported in their efforts to exert peer pressure and form anti-drug abuse groups. o Police/school ties should be strengthened. An Officer Friendly (or equivalent) program must be an active part of the grade school environ- ment. Police must be welcomed in the middle school and high school. Police should be encouraged to sponsor events for the older students such as sport competitions, dances, informational programs. Student/ police communication and relations would prevent a percentage of the problems in Mound. Police could also sponsor a "Crime Stoppers" program in Mound. A more conscious effort on the part of school officials should be made to involve all parents in support groups such as Par and other types of networking. Parents should be encouraged to establish a.¢~r~n~unity focus on "SAY NO." D. City Council The council and the school board are asked to support an all-out anti- drug campaign, to promote it, to become examples of volunteerism and to work together to introduce various programs into the school and the city that will bring awareness to the community. 2. The council is asked to demand that Hennepin County locate services within reasonable distance of our west Hennepin location. The council and all others concerned are asked to encourage businesses which are geared to young people to locate in Mound; eg., movies, non-alcoholic restaurants, roller skating, etc. The council is asked to be strict in the enforcement of liquor regula- tions including the issuance of licenses. The council is asked to explore increasing the recreational programs and ways to encourage more participation in community education courses. 6. The council should sponsor a study to determine the validity of a teen center. A permanent Mayor's Committee should be established to initiate a community-wide anti-drug campaign. Ail interested groups should be represented. The present Task Force committee members should be utilized to work with the new group, sharing information and ideas. Finally, the~Task Force members unanimously request the addition of one policeman to be used in "demand reduction" (education) as well as "supply reduction" (enforcement). (We feel this would be a cost effective step.) The community is blessed with talent, with excellent service organizations, with active churches; but we cannot serve as policemen~ In consideration of what Mound citizens can do, the committee believes that an added law enforcement officer would: 1. Increase security 2. Allow more time for work in both demand reduction (education) and supply reduction (enforcement). With this additional professional backing, Mound must stand up and be counted. We want a clean and safe community. The Mayor's task force sincerely believes Mound citizens will make the effort and we will join together to say "NO" to chemical abuse. LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 ,l~laywood Road Telephone 472-3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544-9511 EMERGENCY 911 MAYOR' S TASK FORCE CHEMICAL ABUSE Local Law Enforcement Issues The Mound Police Department faces a number of problems in its attempts to deal with local chemical abuse issues. A primary concern is the lack of adequate funding and personnel to address the issue; both from an enforcement and aprevention aspect. Following are some specific areas of concern for the Mound Police Department. I. Lack of police personnel Currently the police department is in need of additional manpower to maintain current levels of service. A concerted effort is needed at the elementary school level in prevention programs, but manpower is not available. II. Lack of anonymity of officers In a relatively small community, under cover investigations become very difficult because officers are readily recognized by local "users" and "dealers". Drug networks within the communit~ Again, officers within the community are known; and often times the dealing is done within only known groups that are hard to infiltrate. An additional problem is the age of many of the perpetrators is young and again poses a problem for officers to work into their confidence. IV.. Funding Under cover operations can be very expensive, and there is not additional money available for an extensive investigation. No money is available for "buy" situations or the use of informants. Currently, there is no funding available for prevention programs within the schools. There are a number of prevention program materials for police use; but films, coloring books, and other aids cost money. V. Dysfunctional families There is a high incident of alcohol abuse within the family in Mound. The police department III. responded to 101 domestic situatuions in 1986. Fifty-nine of those incidents involved an assault, and a very large percentage involved individuals who were under the influence. There is a need.to provide adequate services in the area to assist local families in combating the abuse issues and the influence of chemicals. As requested by other members Of'the 'Task Force, included are'some statistics, for the Mound Police Department for 1986. Part I and Part II..Offenses-.(the most serious crimes) rose 23°7% in '1986. There were 127' arrests for DWI;'of which '32.2% were repeat offenders.charged with a gross misdemeanor. The average alcohol concentration of individuals arrested for DWI was .157;a personi~.is legally under ~e influence at .10. The police department.investigated 71 child protection, cases ranging in .severity from'issues 0f neglect to physical and sexual abuse~ For the year, 386 adults were booked by Mound officers; 52 adults for felonies. There were a total of 139 assaults of varying degrees. The city attorney and county att6rney issued an additional 165 formal complaints for an assortment of felony and misdemeanor c~imes. Respectfully prepared and submitted by Chief Len Harr~ A Local Medical Perspective on the Scope of the Drug/Alcohol Use/Abuse in Westonka Statistics - Data is collected from my own inpatient-acute care community hospital and out-patient office experience. I suspect it could be gen- eralized to the other local physicians. Inpatient - During a recent six week period, 65 persons were hospi- talized. Of these, 16 (124%) had significant medical illness being either the primary reason for requiring hospital care, or a substan- tial contributing factor, which resulted from chemical over use or abuse. Specific problems included: 2 persons - alcoholic heart disease (1 expired) 2 persons - alcohol withdrawal syndrome (1 seizure; 1 "DT"'s) 3 persons - alcoholic liver disease (1 cirrhosis [expired] and 2 alcohol hepatitis) 2 overdoses - both multiple sedative-hypnotic drugs (e.g. valium, meprobamate) - recovered 1 hip fracture while intoxicated with alcohol 3 elderly persons were hospitalized for medical illness related to dementia (senility) where alcohol was thought to be the primary ~ c~ntrib~ting .factor to the demontia and who were either actively drinking or had stopped im the past. Many additional problems were noted, predominantly alcohol related, which contribute to mobidity (illness) or complicate medical care such as alcohol related degeneration of the nerves of the limbs (polyneuropathy) resulting in impaired gait, falls, injuries; alcohol induced stomach injury resulting in hemorage, oftentimes requiring blood transfusions. Outpatient - Two weeks experience - one physician - 104 persons seen, 19 (18%) had problems requiring or causing them to seek medical care resulting entirely or in part from chemical injury, predominantly alcohol. Interpretation - My own practice is heavily weighted towards older persons with chronic or acute medical illness. I do not directly deal with surgery or trauma except on a consUltative basis for management of medical compli- cations of what otherwise is surgical disease. Thus, little or no mention is made in the statistics of the injuries and/or trauma resulting from alcohol or drug abuse - falls, fractures, fights, auto accidents, etc. This factor probably also accounts for the overwhelming predominance of alcohol related problems. Fairly effective, though informal, mechanisms are in place among local MD's and pharmacies to limit use and access to potentially addictive opiate drugs and sedatives in this population. These include limited refills on these types of drugs; notification by pharmacists tO physicians of persons who are recieving prescriptions from numerous physicians forduplicate or overlapping drugs of this nature; general knowledge by MD's of various ploys used by abusers to obtain legitimate pre- scriptions for drugs of abuse (we don't have the last laugh on this one! these folks' creativity continually emerges); and the limited prescribing of potent opiate drugs to only those persons with severe intractable pain - e.g. malignancy. Additionally, there are available today numerous non- narcotic analgesics which are safe, effective and non-addictive and lacking abuse potential, so alternatives are available. This leaves me dealing from my "medical perspective" primarily with alcohol related problems. Unfortunately, I typically see them only late in the course of their disease when irreversable medical problems have supervened. This is not to say that we do not deal with use and abuse of "street drugs" including cocaine/crack, pot, LSD, and other hallucingenic drugs, and I suspect that if one were to survey a pediatrician or two, the use of those agents would be greater relative to alcohol. However, the "medical" complications of their use typically comes years down the road and only then do they come into the health care system - outside of trauma sustained as a result of drug use. The economic cost of this is huge. Directly, the cost of health care and hospitalization are relatively easy to estimate. What is more difficult to get at is the indirect cost of time/productivity lost from employment/ school. Most difficult is the .personal and social "cost" in terms of family dysfunction and the amplification of the problem by transmission from one generation to the next. Note: Numbers and statistics cited herein have been generalized and any attempt by the reader to infer a specific time frame or instance from which they were gathered is strictly conjectural. However, I stand by their accuracy.