1988-05-24 CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
A~END~
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, MAY 24, 1988.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
10.
I. Pledge of Allegiance
2. Presentation of $1000 Check from Cheryl Grand of
Contel to city for EConomic Development Purposes.
3. RECONVENED LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW
Hennepin County Assessor Keith Rennerfeldt will
bring back recommendations on properties discussed
at the May 10, 1988 Board of Review. Pg. 1210
4. Approve Minutes of May 10, 1988, Regular Meeting Pg. 1211-1221
5. PUBLIC HEARING% Delinquent Utility Bills pg. 1222-1223
6. Set Date of Public Hearing to Consider a Conditional
Use Permit for a Minor Automobile Repair Business
at 4805 Bartlett Blvd.; Metes and Bounds Description;
Skarp's East Lawn; PID #13-117-24 44 0051
~(SUGGESTED DATE: June 14, 1988) Pg. 1224
7. Appointments to citizens Task Force on the Future
Expansion of Public Facilities (City Hall, Police/
Fire Facilities). pg. 1225-1226
8. Reconsideration of Request for Use of Mound Bay
Park for Bass Fishing Contest Weigh-In (American
Scholarship Foundation - Howard Tripp) pg. 1227-1228
9. Certificate of Approval for On-Sale Liquor License -
A1 & Alma's through the L.M.C.D. pg. 1229-1234
Review of Application to Excavate Existing Channel
for Common Boat Traffic and Constructing a Permanent
Dock for 6 Slips -Seton Place Townhomes -
11.
12.
13.
Dick Smith.
Request for Extension of Resolution No. 87-182.
Waste Oil Tank in New Public Works Facility
DISCUSSION: Possible Sale of Westedge Blvd.
Property
Pg. 1235-12~
pg. 1237-1238
pg. 1239-1241
pg. 1242-1243
14. DISCUSSION:
Possible Purchase of Lynwood Blvd.
Property
Page 1207
15.
16.
Comments & Suggestions from citizens Present
Request for Mound Fire Relief Association to Adjust
Pension Benefits pg. 1244-1261
17. Resolution Approving Use of Municipal State-Aid
Street Funds to Apply Toward the Construction of
C.S.A.H. 15 Project - S.A.P. No. 27-615-14
18. Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and
Accepting Hennepin County's Bid Prices for the
Additional Street Light Improvement on County Road
15 Between Fairview Lane and the Seton Bridge pg. 1264
19. Resolution Reducing the Previously Approved Pending
Assessment for Street Lights on Shoreline Blvd. from
Commerce Blvd. to Fairview Lane pg. 1265
20. Maintenance Permit Request from William Dahlen,
4555 Island View Drive to Construct a stairway
on Commons
21. Report on Request from Michael Malaske, 6557
Bartlett Blvd., RE: Responsibility for Maintenance
and Repair of Sewer Lift Station on Private
Property.
22. Review Status of Projects on Local Licenses:
- Taco-Deli
- Happy Garden Restaurant
- VFW
- D'Vinci's
23.
24.
pg. 1262-1263
pg. 1266-1268
pg. 1269-1272
pg. 1273-1282
pg. 1283-1301
Payment of Bills
iNFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. April 1988 Monthly Financial Report as
Prepared by John Norman, Finance Director pg. 1302-1303
B. 1987 Annual Report of the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District pg. 1304-1313
C. REMINDER: Crosswalk Safety Meeting, Thursday, May 26, 1988,
7:30 P.M., city Council Chambers. Prior to the crosswalk
safety issue, you will have to take action on a request to
consider a Conditional Use permit for a wholesale paint and
wallpaper business at 2365 Commerce Blvd. (Old Contel
office). This is a public hearing.
E. REMINDER: The League of Minnesota cities will sponsor a
Legislative Wrap-Up Meeting, Thursday, May 26, 1988, 1:30 -
4:30 P.M., at the Hotel sofitel in Bloomington. If you want
to attend, we need to know now~
Page 1208
Ge
REHINDER: LMC Annual Conference, June 7-10,
1988 in St. Paul. Attached is an Agenda.
Registration must be in by June 1, 1988.
Communication from Westonka intervention,
dated May, 1988.
Planning commission Minutes - May 9, 1988
pg. 1314-1320
pg. 1321-1324
pg. 1325-1327
Page 1209
65
May 10,
MINUTES -- MOU%rD CITY COUI~CIL - BOAP/) OF REVIEW
}{AY 10, 1988
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Board of Review con-
vened in the Council Chambers of the City of Mound, Nennepin
County, Minnesota, at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City on May 10,
1988, at 7:30 P.M.
Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Counciimembers Don Abel,
Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were:
City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, Hen-
nepin County Assessors Keith Rennerfeldt and Mike McDonald.
Mayor Smith opened the Board of Review and explained that this
meeting is to give property owners a chance to question the
assessed value placed on their property by the County Assessor as
of January 2, 1988. He explained that each person would be heard
and the Board of Review will reconvene at a later date and bring
back their final decision on each property.
Hennepin County Assessor, Keith Rennerfeldt, explained that one
fourth of the city is reviewed in detail each year and this year
the quadrant was North of Shoreline Blvd. and East of Commerce
Blvd. He stated that 7.6% (231) of the total properties in Mound
were sold last year. After these properties sold a study was
done and the sales ratio was at 92.5 of sale prices. Overall,
values increased 5.3% in Mound. The sales of parcels has shown
no change in the land values of property off the lake but on the
lake sales showed that values of land needed to be increased at
least 15%.
The following persons responded to the call to be heard either in
person and by calling and asking to have their name submitted.
They all asked to have the value of their property rechecked be-
cause they felt it was too high.
1. PID ~13-117-24 32 0140 - BOB BURLET, 2044 COMMERCE BLVD.
2. PID %13-117-24 41 0006 - SHARON FfEIER, 4888 EDGEWATER DR.
3. PID %23-117-24 34 0003 - WILLIAM HARDER, 6049 RIDGEWOOD RD.
PID %19-117-23 13 0083 - ELLEN GRAVLEY, 4379 WILSHIRE BLVD.
~C-108
5. PID ~18-117-23 23 0016 - DOROTHY GERARD, 1960 SHOREWOOD LN.
6. PID ~13-117-24 23 0039 - MIKE DOSHAN, 5513 SHERWOOD DR.
7. PID #25-117-24 12 0181 - HARVEY BERGQUIST, 5038 SULGROVE
PID %25-117-24 12 0192 - HARVEY BERGQUIST & PAUL HENRY
I,,,q ll
66
May 10, 1988
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
0193
0194
0179
0180
0004
PID ~25-117-24 12 0223 - PAUL HENRY, 5056 SULGROV~
PID ~13-117-24 21 0085 - RICHARD & MARY MC CURDY, 5330 THREE
POINTS BLVD.
PID ~13-117-24 43 0060 - C~S GRAMITH, 233 W. GRANDVIEW
AVE., ROSEVILLE, MN. 55113
(PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2221 CHATEAU)
PID ~24-117-24 23 0021 - LEROY HOLDEN, 5459 BARTLETT BLVD.
PID ~24-117-24 13 0003 - CHARLES JACKSON, 6311 BAYRIDGE RD.
PID ~13-117-24 32 0160 - BOB JOHNSON, 5488 TONKAWOOD ROAD
PID ~19-117-23 31 0004 - DENNIS FULRATH, 4580 DENBIGH ROAD
PID 013-117-24 22 0001 - RAYMOND FALLS, 5503 THREE POINTS
BLVD.
PID ~23'117-24 13 0066 - B.J. MALCHESKI, 5830 BARTLETT BLVD.
PID ~12-117-24 43 0003 - ROGER POLLEY, 1559 EAGLE LANE
PID 013-117-24 32 0142 - MIKE BARLOW, 2072 COMMERCE BLVD.
PID ~13-117-24 31 0023 - DAYTON WILLIAMSON, 2012 VILLA LANE
PID ~19-117-23 24 0060 & - (Fl06)
PID ~19-117-23 13 0129 - (D206)
TED FOX, 4363 WILSHIRE BLVD.
PID ~22-117-24 44 0004 - BERNARD BENZ, 3035 BLUFFS LANE
PID ~30-117-23 22 0086 - SCOTT MACK, 4657 ISLAND VIEW DR.
PID ~13-117-24 31 0080 - GLEN SMITH, 2174 OVERLAND
PID 013-117-24 23 0041 - JOHN OLSON, 2060 WATERSIDE LANE
PID #13-117-24 23 0022 - LEANNE PEDERSON, 2050 WATERSIDE LN.
PID ~19-117-23 31 0104 - RONALD JOHNSON, 4416 DORCHESTER
PID ~24-i17-24 24 0011 - LEE JESSEN, 5189 EMERALD DRIVE
PID ~13-117-24 21 0067 - J.D. SKELTON & M.U. BROWN, 1770
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
67
May 10, 1988
PID ~13-117-24 22 0055 - BA~-WOOD SHOP. ES DRIV]E
PID ~24-117-24 41 0186 - LAWRENCE JOHNSON, 4842 BRUNSWICK
PID ~24-117-24 22 0031 - JOHN KUHLM~, 2503 LOST LAKE ROAD
PID ~13-117-24 31 0073 - CLAP/< PETERS, 2146 NOBLE LANE
PID ~22-117-24 44 0031 - MIKE MALASKE, 6557 BARTLETT BLVD.
PID 023-117-24 32 0029 - RICHARD SMITH, 6600 MOEAW/< DR.,
EDINA, MN. (PROPERTY ADDRESS:
WESTEDGE BLVD.)
PID ~19-117-23 34 0081 - JOHN PRICE, 3110 iSLAND VIEW DR.
PID ~25-117-24 11 0035 - MARK RECKINGER, 4841 ISLAND VIEW
DR~
36. PID ~23-117-24 32 0047 - DOUG BRYCE, 2865 PLALSTEAD LA~E
37. PID ~13-117-24 23 0011 - GARY BREUF~, 5420 BREEZY RD.
38. PID ~22-117-24 43 0013 - BILL ~EYER, 6601 BARTLETT BLVD.
39 PID ~22~117-24 44 0005 - DALE SHERBURNE, 6511 BAY RIDGE RD.
40. PID ~ ~13-117-24 21 0054 - RICHARD HASCALL, 1733 BAY-WOOD LANE
41. PID ~24-117-24 41 0012 - DAVID O'DONNELL, 2914 BP~ADFORD LkNE
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded b~ Abel to reconvene the
Board of Review on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, at 7:30 P.M. in
the city Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - MAY 10, 1988
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, May 10, 1988, at 10:00 P.M. in the
Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Don Abel,
Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were:
City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, city
Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer John Cameron, Building Offi-
cial Jan Bertrand, L.M.C.D. Representative Tom Reese, Cable Con-
sulting Attorney Tom Creighton, Cable Analyst Kevin Cattoor, Mary
Smith representing Dowden Communications, Jim Vaughn representing
Triax, and the following interested citizens: Jim Bedell, Oswin
Pflug, Mark Roufs, Charles Gramith, Martin Luebke.
68
May 10, 1988
MINUTES
MOTION made by Abel, seconded b~ Jensen to approve the
minutes of the April 26, 1988. Regular Meeting, as sub-
mitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING:' PROPOSED SAL~ OF DOWDEN COM-
MUNICATIONS OF MINNESOTA
Cable Consultant Tom Creighton and Financial Analyst Kevin Cat-
toor were present. Mr. Creighton explained that Dowden has
worked out an agreement with the Northwest Cable System to gai~
access to Regional Channel 6. They presented a resolution recom-
mending approval of the sale and transfer of Dowden to Triax.
The Mayor reconvened the public hearing.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
There were no comments.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #88-75
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SALE AND TRANS-
FER OF OWNERSHIP IN CABLE SYSTEM AND
TRANSFER OF CABLE FRANCHISE OF DOWDEN
CABLE PARTNERS, L.P. TO TRIAX MIDWEST
ASSOCIATES, L.P.
The V°te was unanimously i~ favor. Motion Carried.
PUBLIC HEARING:
COUNTY ROAD 15 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT FROM
FAIRVIEW LAR~ TO SETON BRIDGE'
The City Engineer explained that the estimated cost of these ad-
ditional street lights is $69,460.00. This added to the pre-
viously approved project results in a total estimated cost of
$179,600.00 for lighting the entire length of County Road 15 in
Mound. The bids the County received were $20,000 less than ex-
pected.
He stated that after checking with the lighting ekpert 'he is
recommending 18 additional lights instead of the 16 originally
recommended. There would be 7 lights at approximately 110 foot
spacing between Montclair Lane and the Seton Bridge and 11 lights
at approximately 150 foot spacing between Montclair Lane and
Fairview Lane.
He then explained the proposed assessment procedure. Residential
property would be assessed at approximately $9.00 per front foot
and commercial property at $13.50 per front foot. This is lower
than the ~roposed assessment in the original report for the ap-
proved project which were $9.72 and $14.50 respectively. In han-
dling the previously approved pending assessment, he suggested
that the Council pass a separate resolution reducing them to the
new figures.
69
May 10, 1988
The Mayor opened the public hearing. The following persons spoke
against the proposed street lighting improvement:
Jim Bedell, owner of property at 4801 & 4805 Shoreline Blvd.
Oswin Pflug, 4851 Shoreline Blvd.
Mark Roufs, 2216 Fairview Lane
Chuck Gramith, owner of 2221 Chateau Lane
Martin Luebke, 5081 Shoreline Blvd.
Mr. Bedell submitted the following statement signed by the fol-
lowing persons: "We, the abutting property owners of the
proposed street light improvement and assessment are opposed to
the improvement and assessment." Jim Bedell, Oswin Pflug, Joseph
Glenn, Steve Anderson.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
The Council discussed the improvement, the safety factors and
that it would be cheaper and easier to do this improvement now
when everything is torn up. It.was explained that of the total
$180,000 estimated cost !/2 would be assessed and the remainder
paid by the City's State Aid funds and the City.
Jessen moved and Abel seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %88-76
RESOLUTION ORDERING THE ADDITIONAL
STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT AS ADVERTISED
The vote was 4 in favor with Mayor Smith voting nay.
carried.
Motion
PUBLIC HEARING:
PROPOSED VACATION OF SLOPE EASEMENT OVER A POR-
TION OF LOT 2 AND PART OF LOT 3r BLOCK 1~
PEMBROKE
m E)
PID ~19-117-23 34 0112 (3002 INVERNESS
The Building official explained the request and stated that the
Planning Commission recommended approval with the City Engineer's
condition.
The City Engineer explained that the slope easement was
originally obtained for the construction of Tuxedo Blvd. He
stated that it does not appear necessary for the City to retain
this slope easement and recommended vacating it under one condi-
tion. The condition that grading is not allowed until a survey
for a building permit is submitted and approved, which shows the
location of the proposed house and all existing and proposed
elevations as required by the City of Mound.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mayor closed the public hearing.
There was no response. The
Abel moved and Jensen seconded the fOllowing resolution:
70
May 10, 1988
RESOLUTION %88-77
RESOLUTION VACATING A SLOPE EASEMENT
OVER A PORTION OF LOT 2 AND PART OF LOT
3, BLOCK it PEHBROKE PID 919-117-23 34
0112 (3002 INVERNESS LANE)
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING:
TO GAIN INPUT FROM CITIZENS AS TO TMI~. EXPECTED
LEVEL OF CITY SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED IN THE
NExT CALENDAR YEAR
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mayor closed the public hearing.
There was no response. T~e
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
No one responded.
APPOINTMENTS TO CITIZENS TASK FORCE ON THE FUTURE EXPANSION OF
PUBLIC FACILITIES (CITY HALL, POLICE/FIRE FACILITIES)
There was no action taken on this item. It will be on the May
24th Agenda.
2 REQUESTS FOR USE OF MOUND BAY PARK FOR BASS FISHING CONTEST
WEIGH,INS
The City Manager stated that two requests for the use of Mound
Bay Park for bass fishing contest weigh-ins have been received
from the L.M.C.D. One for the kmerican Scholarship Foundation
and the other for the Happy Hookers Bass Club.
The City's L.M.C.D. Representative, Tom Reese, was present and
stated that he is not in favor of the City allowing these weigh-
ins because of safety issues involved in having large numbers of
boats in a confined area where there is no place to dock and the
close proximity to the swimming beach.
The Council looked at the both the requests and decided the one
from the Happy Hookers Bass Club was sent to the City in error
because it states the weigh-in will be held on Goose Island.
There was discussion on the request from the American Scholarship
Foundation and the following action was taken because of the
safety concerns and lack of dockage.
MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jensen to deny the request
of the American Scholarship Foundation to use Mound Bay Park
on June 5, 1988, for the weigh-in portion of a bass tourna-
ment because of safety problems and lack of dockage. The
vote was 4 in favor with Johnson voting nay. ~otion
carried.
71
_May 10, 1988
UPDATE FROM L.M.C.D.
Tom Reese reported that a consultant, Arndorfer/Barr, has been
retained to do a comprehensive management plan for Lake Min-
netonka. This will be a 2 year study. The City will be con-
tacted to provide input.
Mr. Reese urged the Council to pass the resolution sent out by
the City of Excelsior supporting the L.M.C.D. and the comprehen-
sive plan for the management of Lake Minnetonka.
Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %88-78
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE LMCD AND THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF
LAKE MINNETONKA
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF RESOLUTION ~85-59 FOR GARY HEINES
Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %88-79
RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF ONE
YEAR FOR RESOLUTION %85-59 TO GARY
HEINES
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
ADD ON ITEMS
SET HEARING DATE
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to set Thursday,
May 26, 1988, at 7:30 P.M. for a public hearing to consider
a Conditional Use Permit for a wholesale paint and wallpaper
business at 2365 Commerce Blvd.; Lots 5 and part of Lot 4
and 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 167, PID %14-117-24 44
0003/0006. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
UTILITY EASEMENTS - LOTS 94t 95 & 96, PHELPS ISLA1TD PARK, FIRST
DIVISION - LAND REGISTRATION ~19433
The City Engineer explained that when the owner of the above
property was trying to register the land, several problems came
to light. Originally, the City was granted a 5 foot easement
along the West side of Lot 94. When it was surveyed it was dis-
covered that the curb is within the easement on one side and on
the other side it is not. It is over about 2.2 feet. We need to
request an additional 3 feet to make the total easement 8 feet
along the West side of Lot 94.
72
May 10, 1988
The Engineer further stated that along the North side of these 3
lots there is a private driveway (Denbigh Road) which has pre-
viously come before the Council to be improved and become a City
street. To this point nothing has been done and it remains a
private driveway. The City does have watermain in there and they
do have a 15 foot utility easement across the 3 lots. The City
needs a 20 foot easement across those lots in case the road is
ever improved and if we can get it at this time at no charge it
would be advisable.
The owner has agreed to grant a 7 foot easement on Lot 94 and the
20 foot easement across the three lots but they have asked how
granting these easements will affect their ability to acquire a
building permit and meet the City's requirements. It does create
a problem on Lot 94 because the easements reduce the area of the
lot to 5,715 square feet which is under the 6,000 square foot
minimum but within 10% and the City has granted variances on
these in the past.
The Staff's recommendation is to receive the two easements and
grant the variance on Lot 94 if it is requested. The other solu-
tion would be to take Lots 94 and 95 and split them in the other
direction which would make each of those lots 6,000 square feet.
The Planning Commission recommended some type of subdivision So
that ~Lot 94 would have 6,00.0 square:feet and the City would waive
the fee to accomplish this because the City would-be reCeiving
two easements from the owner.
MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jensen to have the City
Manager direct a letter indicating that the Planning Commis-
sion and the City Council have reviewed this and they agree
that the person should not lose a building site as a result
of contributing land to the City and it would also make
sense if Lots 94 and 95 were subdivided to front on Cardiff
Lane and the City would participate by waiving the fees.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
WASTE OIL TANK IN NEW PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY
The City Engineer passed out a letter he requested from Gausman &
Moore, the mechanical engineers on the new public works facility,
so that the Council is aware of what could happen in the future
with regard to the underground waste oil tank. He then ex-
plained that the plans for the waste oil tank meet all the
requirements that are presently law but, the EPA and the MPCA are
in the process of adopting new regulations. So what Gausman &
Moore are saying is that maybe the City should look at putting a
tank in that would meet the new regulations if they are passed.
The Council discussed the differences in the tanks and the in-
creased cost of installing a tank to meet the possible new
73
?ay 10, 1988
regulations. The cost of a fibergla~ tank as suggested in the
Gausman & Moore letter is estimated to be $13,500. The 560 gal-
lon steel tank that was just approved in the change order was
$6,400.
The Council asked the City Engineer to research other options,
such as an above ground tank, inside storage and the cost of a
fiberglas tank and bring back at the next meeting.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Abel to authorize the
payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount
of $120,028.50, when funds are available. A roll call vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. April 1988 Department Head Monthly Reports.
B. Planning Commission Minutes of April 25, 1988.
Ce
De
The League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) Annual Conference will
be held June 7-10, 1988 in St. Paul. Preliminary agenda was
published in the April 1988 issue of Minnesota Cities.
The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (A~fM) will be
holding its Annual Meeting, Wednesday, May 18, 1988, at
Nicklow's in Crystal.
The LMC will hold Legislative Wrap-Up Meetings this month.
The metro session is scheduled for Thursday, May 26, 1988,
1:30 to 4:30 P.M. at the Hotel Sofitel in Bloomington.
John Cameron, City Engineer, has received a telephone call
from Wayne Ehlebracht, one of the ~roperty owners on Norwood
Lane, regarding easements to be provided for the cul-de-sac
improvement discussed at the April 12th Council Meeting.
Ehlebracht has refused to give the City an easement. There-
fore, by the action the Council took on April 12th, Norwood
Lane will be extended to County Road 15. No cul-de-sac will
be installed.
REMINDER: A special meeting of the City Council will be
held on Thursday, May 26, 1988. The purpose of this meeting
will be to discuss crosswalk safety in the City with Hen-
nepin County representatives. An invitation to attend the
meeting will be extended to many persons. News releases
will also announce the meeting.
74
May 10, 1988
EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Council went into Executive Session at 12:00 midnight.
returned at 12:30 A.M.
They
ACRE SITE - WESTEDGE BLVD.
The City Attorney explained that there is a proposal from a real
estate company with an earnest money contract to purchase the
property essentially at the price the City asked for the
property. There are two contingencies to the contract. They
are:
That the buyer get ingress and egress to the property.
There is a question as to whether the property fronts
on a public road.
That the buyer can have his own well because there is
no City water supply in that area. The Attorney stated
that the Council could grant this request because there
is no City water available.
The Council asked that Staff clarify if the property fronts on a
public road and allows ingress and egress to the property.
The COuncil asked that the. buyer be made aware and it be.put in
the contract that the Council will allow only 1-house on the
property until municipal utilities are available.
The Council asked the City Manager to ask Minnetrista again if
they are interested in installing watermain in Westedge Blvd.
This item will be taken up at the next meeting after all the
issues are addressed.
LYNWOOD BLVD. PROPERTY
The Council asked that this item be put on the May ~24th Agenda
for discussion at that time.
MOTION made by Abel, seconded by Jensen to adjourn at 12:40
A.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk
Hay 1988
RESOLUTION NO. 88-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ENTIRE ASSESSMENT
ROLL AS AMENDED
WHEREAS, pursuant to M.S. 274.03, notice was posted on
April 25, 1988, and published in The Laker on April 25, 1988,
that the Board of Review would meet at 7:30 P.M., May 10, 1988,
in the Council Chambers, 5341Maywood Road, for the purpose of
reviewing and correcting the assessment of said City of Mound,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, for the year 1989; and
WHEREAS, this meeting was held and 4~ persons were
heard, or presented their cases in writing, all asking to have
the value of their property rechecked; and
WHEREAS, in order to allow the Hennepin County Assessors
time to recheck these properties, the meeting was continued until
May 24, 1988, at 7:30 P.M., at which time the Broad of Review
reconvened, and the Hennepin County Assessor gave his decisions
on the property questioned at the May 10th Meeting (see Minutes
..of the May 24, 1988. continuation of the Board of Review for
actions taken and approved); and
WHEREAS, the public w@s instructed that after the
decisions were given and approved by the City Council, the
property owner has the right to appeal the decision to the
Hennepin County Board of Review.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the entire
assessment roll as presented and corrected (See minutes of May
24, 1988, for corrections).
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
BILLS---MAY 10, l~B$
Batch 8043
Batch 8044
45,761.96
74,266.54
Total Bills.
120,O28.50
110 130 123
11 0130 181
11 0130 302
ll 0130 692
11 0160 871
11 0160 931
11 0162 241
11 o19o '481
11 0250 214
11 028O 391
11 0280 541
11 0310 152
11 0310 271
11 0310'661
11 O430 061
11 046O 121
11 0520 182
11 O520 361
11 0550 182
110550 301
11 0640 243
11 0672 573
11 0760 033
11 0760 123
11 0850
11 1120 033
11~1120 241
11 1120 301
11 1120 571
Delinquent Water and Sewer
$ 81.51
239.40
116.36
103.26
73.90
175.71
224.59
74.16
89.02
83.59
98.53
91.52
80.81
'95.40
228.48
101.00
166.26
135.28
185.75
255.64
130.34
76.88
133.36
109.75
136.01
102.66
165.14
116.70
101.46
5-18-88
110 130 123
ll O130 181
11 O130 302
11 O130 692
ll O160 871
11 O160 931
11 O162 241
11 O190 481
11 0250 214
11 0280 391
11 0280 541
11 O310 152
11 O310 271
11 O310 661
11 0430 061
11 0460 121
11 0520 182
11 0520 361
11 0550 182
110550 301
11 0640 243
11 0672 573
11 0760 033
11 0760 123
11 0850 751
11 1120 033
11~1120 241
11 ll20 301
Il 1120 571
Delinquent Water and Sewer
Ray Baylor $ 81.51
Duane Burda 239.40
Sandy Lundin 116.36
Michael Kahler 103.26
Howard Hodena 73.90
Merlin Woytcke 175.71
John Hirt 224.59
Mik Tom Mortgage Co. 74.16
J. Peterson 89.02
Rita Mussehl 83.59
Ronald Nelson 98.53
Greg Cote 91.52
D. Fenner 80.81
Craig Hillern 95.40
R. Heuer 228.48
Marsha Bjerke 101.O0
Mark Annen 166.26
Don Geffre 135.28
Russ Witham 185.75
Marie Hofstadter 255.64
Brian Johnson 130.34
Rod Hanson 76.88
Jon Subrant 133.36
Tom Forstek 109.75
Thomas Hawley 136.O1
Tim Heath 102.66
James Swanson 165.14
Eugene Whitbeck 116.70
Steve Schmidt 101.46
5-18-88
1677 Avocet tn.
1681 Avocet Ln.
1708 Avocet Ln.
1744 Avocet Ln.
17OO Bluebird Ln. Paid
1701 Bluebird Ln. Paid
1749 Bluebird Ln. *
19OO Gull Ln.
1590 Eagle Ln.
1625 Finch Ln. Paid
1656 Finch Ln.
1601 Gull Ln. Paid
1623 Gull Ln. Paid
1721 Gull Ln.
5022 Sparrow Rd
1737 Sumach Ln.
4943 Crestview Rd.
5016 Crestview Rd.
5051 Woodland Rd.
5139 Woodland Rd. Paid
4945 Glen Elyn Rd.
1948 Shorewood Ln *
1712 Resthaven Ln. Paid
1720 Resthaven Ln. Paid
4987 Three Pts. Blvd.
5918 Gumwood Rd.
5941 Gumwood Rd.
5947 Gumwood Rd.
2986 Highland Blvd.
Pd $2O.OO
Pd $10.O0
Paid
Paid
~aid
Paid
Pd$100.O0
Paid
Paid
11 1120 632
11 1240 391
11 1360 031
11 1360 093
11 1660 091
11 1690 272
11 1690 544
11 1690 751
11 1692 212
11 1692 571
11 1692 871
11 1694 631
11 1750 062
11 1750 154
11 1750 243
11 1930 181
11 1930 273
11 1930 483
11 1960 153
11 2140 121
11 2140 151
11 2200 091
11 2200 241
11 2200 301
112290 421
Jean Cody
Douglas Rodewald
Scott Olson
Steve Hanson
Verlin Payne
Jerry Kohls
Dan Dustin
Francid Engle
Richard Young
Robert Blake
Kent Li]legren
Sherry Johnson
Sohns & Sabin
Anderson & Lee
Chuck Downey
Jo Evenson
Jeff Mertz
HUD
Mark Crawford
Tim White
Jo Warlin
HUD
G. Garvais
Brad Goranson
Paul Ford
S175.27
123.62
7t.90
166.84
103.74
73.'63
138.45
74.34
183.37
108.10
137.09
118.53
118.25
147.18
81.73
165.79
140.26
135.46
147.64
75.83
78.60
183.25
135.65
72.67
127.24
$6856.90
$3280.89
5978 Gumwood Rd.
6090 Aspen Rd.
2168 Birch Ln.
6216 Birch Ln.
2257 Cottonwood Ln.
5424 Lynwood Blvd
5709 Lynwood Blvd
5720 Lynwood Blvd
5843 Lynwood Blvd
5932 Lynwood Blvd
5972 Lynwood Blvd
6256 Lynwood Blvd
5444 Spruce Rd.
5505 Spruce Rd.
5510 Spruce Rd.
2146 Cedar Ln.
2159 Cedar Ln.
2186 Cedar Ln.
2148 Basswood Ln.
2130 Centerview Ln.
2138 Centerview Ln.
2155 Cardina! Ln.
2180 Cardinal Ln.
2197 Cardinal Ln.
5598 Sherwood Dr.
*Signed Contract
Paid
Paid
Pd. $90.00
Paid
Paid
,
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
110 130 123
11 O130 181
11 O130 302
11 0130 692
11 O160 871
11 0160 931
11 O162 241
11 O190 481
11 0250 214
11 0280 391
11 0280 541
11 O310 152
11 0310 271
11 O310 661
11 0430 O61
11 0460 121
11 0520 182
11 0520 361
11 0550 182
11 0550 301
11 0640 243
11 O672 573
11 O760 O33
11 0760 123
11 0850 751
11 1120 033
11 :~1120 241
11 1120 301
11 1120 571
Delinquent Water and Sewer
Ray Baylor $ 81.51
Duane Burda 239.40
Sandy Lundin 116.36
Michael Kahler 103.26
Howard Hodena 73.90
Merlin Woytcke 175.71
John Hirt 224.59
Mik Tom Mortgage Co. 74.16
J. Peterson 89.02
Rita Mussehl 83.59
Ronald Nelson 98.53
Greg Cote 91.52
D. Fenner 80.81
Craig Hillern 95.40
R. Heuer 228.48
Marsha Bjerke 101.00
Mark Annen 166.26
Don Geffre 135.28
Russ Witham 185.75
Marie Hofstadter 255.64
Brian Johnson 130.34
Rod Hanson 76.88
Jon Subrant 133.36
Tom Forstek 109.75
Thomas Hawley 136.O1
Tim Heath 102.66
James Swanson 165.14
Eugene Whitbeck 116.70
Steve Schmidt 101.46
5-18-88
1677 Avocet Ln.
1681 Avocet Ln.
1708 Avocet Ln.
1744 Avocet Ln.
1700 Bluebird Ln. Paid
1701 Bluebird Ln. Paid
1749 Bluebird Ln. *
19OO Gull Ln.
1590 Eagle Ln.
1625 Finch Ln. Paid
1656 Finch Ln.
1601 Gull Ln. Paid
1623 Gull Ln. Paid
1721 Gull Ln.
5022 Sparrow Rd Pd $10.00
1737 Sumach Ln. Paid
4943 Crestview Rd. Paid
5016 Crestview Rd. Paid
5051 Woodland Rd.
5139 Woodland Rd. Paid
4945 Glen Elyn Rd.
1948 Shorewood Ln *
1712 Resthaven Ln. Paid
1720 Resthaven Ln. Paid
4987 Three Pts. Blvd.
5918 Gumwood Rd. Paid
5941Gumwood Rd. Pd$1OO.OO
5947 Gumwood Rd. Paid
2986 Highland Blvd. Paid
Pd $20.00
11 1120 632
11 1240 391
11 1360 031
11 1360 093
11 1660 091
11 1690 272
11 1690 544
11 1690 751
11 1692 212
11 1692 571
11 1692 871
11 1694 631
11 1750 062
11 1750 154
11 1750 243
11 1930 181
11 1930 273
11 1930 483
11 1960 153
11 2140 121
11 2i40 151
11 2200 091
11 2200 241
11 2200 301
112290 421
Jean Cody
Douglas Rodewald
Scott Olson
Steve Hanson
Verlin Payne
Jerry Kohls
Dan Dustin
Francid Engle
Richard Young
Robert Blake
Kent Lillegren
Sherry Johnson
Sohns & Sabin
Anderson &'Lee
Chuck Downey
Jo Evenson
Jeff Mertz
HUD
Mark Crawford
Tim White
Jo Warlin
HUD
G. Garvais
Brad Goranson
Paul Ford
$175.27
123.62
71.90
166.84
103.74
73.'63
138.45
74.34
183.37
108.10
t37.09
118.53
118.25
147.18
81.73
165.79
140.26
135.46
147.64
75.83
78.6O
183.25
135.65
72.67
127.24
$6856.90
$3280.89
5978 Gumwood Rd.
6090 Aspen Rd.
2168 Birch Ln.
6216 Birch Ln.
2257 Cottonwood Ln.
5424 Lynwood Blvd
5709 Lynwood Blvd
5720 Lynwood Blvd
5843 Lynwood Blvd
5932 Lynwood Blvd
5972 Lynwood Blvd
6256 Lynwood Blvd
5444 Spruce Rd.
5505 Spruce Rd.
5510 Spruce Rd.
2146 Cedar Ln.
2159 Cedar Ln.
2186 Cedar Ln.
2148 Basswood Ln.
2130 Centerview Ln.
2138 Centerview Ln.
2155 Cardinal Ln.
2180 Cardinal Ln.
2197 Cardinal Ln.
5598 Sherwood Dr.
*Signed Contract
Paid
Paid
Pd. $90.00
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
Paid
'Paid
Paid
Paid
11 1120 632
11 1240 391
11 1 360 031
11 1360 093
11 1660 091
11 1690 272
11 1690 544
11 1690 751
11 1692 212
11 1692 571
11 1692 871
11 1694 631
11 1750 062
11 175o 154
11 1750 243
11 1930 181
11 1930 273
11 1930 483
11 1960 153
11 2140 121
11 2140 151
11 2200 091
11 2200 241
11 2200 301
11 2290 421
$175.27
123.62
71.90
166.84
103.74
73.63
138.45
74.34
183.37
108.10
137.09
118.53
118.25
147.18
81.73
165.79
140.26
135.46
147.64
75.83
78.60
183.25
135.65
72.67
127.24
$6856.90
HEARING NOTICE
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND~ MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF'PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MINOR AUTOMOBILE
REPAIR BUSINESS AT 48C)5 BARTLETT BOULEVARD;
METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION; SKARP'S EAST
LAWN; PlO NUMBER 13-117-24 44 0051
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, thmt the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341
Maywood Road, at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday~ dune 14~ I'B:B.8 to consider
an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Minor
Automobile Repair Business at 4E:05 Bartlett Boulevard, legal
description: ~
Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 3 than Southwesterly
22.2 feet along Northwesterly line thereof than Southeasterly 35
feet to a point 22 feet Southwesterly from Northeasterly line
thereof than Southeasterly at an angle 4:B degrees 34 minutes to ·
right 10.6 feet than Southeasterly 30 feet parallel with'"'
Northeasterly line thereof than Northeasterly 45 feet to m point
in Northemsterly line thereof distance P5.6 feet Southeasterly
from Northwesterly corner thereof than Southeasterly 4.4 feet
along 'the Northeasterly line thereof than Northeasterly.mt mn
ang'le of 81 degrees 27 minutes to the left to Southerly line of
County Road No. 7 than Southwesterly along said County Road line
to beginnings(Lots 1, 2 amd 3) Skarp~s East Lawn; RID ~ 13-117-
24 44 0051 (Formerly Watercare Building)
Ali persons appearing at said hearing with reference
to the above will be heard at this meeting.
Francene C. Clark, City Clerk
Publish in The Laker May
May 20, 1988
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1165
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL~,
?
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
CITIZENS TASK FORCE ON FUTURE EXPANSION OF PUBLIC
FACILITIES (CITY HALL, POLICE/FIRE FACILITIES)
At the last council meeting, names were submitted for appointment
to the citizens task force on future expansion of public
facilities. Attached is Councilmember Liz Jensen's memo dated May
10, 1988. Other names that were submitted at the last meeting
were: Mr. John Simons, 2629 Clare Lane; Robert "Bob" Tomalka,
3165 Priest ~e~a~r~~ 5016 Woodr~~e~'i'y
"Tasa, 4924 Three Poin~S--~ivd. It was my understanding tha~
'b~i~ Council would be submitting resumes on these persons at the
next meeting. Previously, Mayor Smith had asked that the
fo~'ing be-considered by the Committee:
1. Expansion of City Hall within existing parameters
2. Expansion of City Hall by adding onto it - justification
for this with estimated cost
3. Proposed funding
/
C~cil consensus earlier was that the ?ask Force would meet for
-approximately one year, using six months to assess the problem
and six months to address and plan how to resolv~em.
~so, previously-d~scussed, were that-four to five sb~ members
would serve as ex officio non voting ~e-~ers. They included the
police chief, fire chief, parks director, building inspector and
city manager. It is my recommendation that our City Engineer be
included as an ex-officio non-voting member. His attendance
would not be initially required, but he should be attending
following Task Force's general recommendations and prior to the
City Council reviewing those recommendations. In other words, if
the Task Force is going to consider estimated costs of
improvem_ent~_ ~a~e going to need data that must be prepared
by the ~ty EngineeO. His services of course, will be an
addition1~Q-~-4~~ the City to absorb.
ES:la
An 8c~ual opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, natior:a; ori~c~r% or handicapped status
in t'he adrnisslon or access to, or treatment or employment hq, its programs and ac!lvtbe$.
May 10, i988
To:
From:
Re:
Don Able
Phyllis Jessen
Skip Johnson
Steve Smith
Ed Shukle
Liz Jensen
Citizens Task Force
I recommend the following individuals be asked to serve on
the Citizens Task Force to address the issues around
expansion of our Public Facilities, i.e., expansion of the
Fire Station, City Hall, and the Police Offices:
Bob Morgan
.=~ ~ '-r
~4/0 B~ tlett Blvd.
472-5..5,64
Pat Meisel
J 55~1 Bartlett Blvd.
J 47~-2097
I have spoken to both of these people. They have given me
permission to submit their names. They are willing.to serve
on the Task Force and are anxious to contribute to their
Community in this way. I highly recommend both individuals
because of the unique skills and experiences they would bring
to the process.
Bob is a Design Architect for Opus Corporation. His job is
doing what it is we need to get done for our City Facilities.
In addition, Bob served on such task forces for the
Minneapolis Park Board and the City of Minneapolis before
moving to Mound. He brings e;.,'tensive knowledge of ~¢hat we
need to accomplish and experience in the process we are
using.
Pat is the Co-¢:.wner of, and keeper of the Books for, Meisel
Hardware Specialties, a thriving business that ~¢as
headquartered in Mound. She is now planning a ne~ business
venture in Mound. She is 'tuned into both the business and
residential Communities and will continue to be. Plus she
brings the financial focus we will want addressed in the Task
Force's considerations and recommendation.
May 20, 1988
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-11§5
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL _~{.
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
AGENDA ITEM - RECONDERATION OF REQUEST FOR USE OF
MOUND BAY PARK FOR BASS FISHING CONTEST WEIGH-IN,
AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
As you recall, at the May 10, 1988, Council meeting you denied a
request for use of Mound Bay Park for purposes of a bass fishing
contest weigh-in on June 5, 1988 for the American Scholarship
Foundation. On Monday, May 16th, I had a phone conversation with
Mr. Howard Tripp, representative of the American Scholarship
-Foundation Bass Fishing Tournament. Mr. Tripp indicated that
approximately one month ago he came to the City of Mound and was
given approval for a public gathering permit for June 5th. O'n
the permit it stated that it would be for a weigh-in/fishing
contest (NOTE: Public gathering permits are granted by the staff
for large groups using Mound Bay Park. Typically, they are used
for large picnics and other types of family gatherings.) The
staff did approve a public gathering permit. One of the staff
persons indicated on the permit that it required an LM'CD permit.
There was obviously a misunderstanding and miscommunication
between the City and Mr. Tripp because he was under the
impression that the City of Mound had approved his permit and it
was a matter of getting the LMCD approval.
When notified by the LMCD that Mr. Tripp had applied to their
agency for the bass fishing tournament permit, we received notice
and immediately put it on the Council agenda. I told him that in
the cases of fishing contests, due to the fact that it seems to
be a very sensitive issue with the LMCD and the surrounding lake
communities, that the Council does review these applications. He
would also like to be present to give you background on the
tournament. He indicated to me that materials have already been
sent to prospective participants and this was based upon the
public gathering permit approval by City staff.
equal opDortunity Employer that does not discriminate on the bas~s of race, Color, nat;or, al orf§'.n, or handicapped status
m fha admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs ard activities.
Therefore, it is obvious that there was miscommunica~ion between
staff and Mr. Tripp regarding use of the Mound Bay Park
facilities. That is why I have agreed to place this item on the
agenda for your reconsideration.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
ES:is
CITY of MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
May 16, 1988
._-- Mr. To.m Reese
5641 Bartlett Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Tom:
As we discussed last week, the City of Mound has received notice
that A1 & Alma's has applied for a liquor license for their six
charter boats. I understand that there is a public hearing
--before the LMCD on May 25, 1988, regarding this issue. I would
like to bring this before the City Council at its May 24, 1988,
regular meeting. I would like your input as to whether or not
the City should grant approval. I would also tike to know what
the LMCD's preliminary reaction is to this application and
whether or not any opportunity has been given to A1 & Alma's for
their input. Please advise me no later than Thursday, May 19,
1988, so that I can place this on the agenda.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Shukle, Jr.
City Manager
ES :!s
An equal oppo~,uni~y Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or handicapped status
iq the admission or access to, or treatment or employment ~n, its programs and activities.
To:
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Wayzata Weekly News/South Shore Weekly News
Wayzata Sailor, Excelsior Sailor,
Minnetonka Sailor, Westonka Sailor
The Laker/Pioneer
i988
PUBLISH: 5-12-88
or next issue
From: Frank Mixa
Executive Director
L.M.C.D.
473-7033
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
AL & ALMA'S
LIQUOR LICENSES
Notice is hereby given that the Lake Minnetonka Conservation
District will hold a public hearing at the Tonka Bay
Village Hall, 4901Manitou Road (Co. Rd. 19) at 7'
p.m. on Wednesday, May 25, 1988 in the matter of liquor
licenses for on-sale beer and wine on the six charter
boats of A1 & Alma's Supper Club Inc., 5201 Piper
Road, City of Mound, on LMCD Area 3 (Cooks Bay).
Frank Mixa, Executive Director
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
LAKE
402 EAST LAKE STREET
MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
WAYZATA. MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 6121473-7033
FRANK MIXA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
BOARD MEMBERS
Robert Rascop, Chairman
Shorewood
JoEIlen Hurt, Vice Chairman
Orono
Carl H, Weisser, Secretary
Excelsior
Mark Westlund, Treasurer
Wayzata
Marvin Bjorlin
Tonka Bay
Jan Boswinkel
Minnetonka Beach
Richard J. Garwood
Deephaven
Peter Hill
Victoria
Ron Kraemer
Spring Park
John Lawman
Uinnetrista
Richard Nelson
Greenwood
Robert K. Pillsbury
Minnetonka
Thomas W. Reese
Mound
Robert E. Slocum
Woodland
May 9, 1988
City of Mound
c/o Edward Shukle, Mgr.
5341Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ed:
The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District has received
an application for a liquor license on a charter boat
as described on the enclosed certificate.
LMCD ordinances require that before a license can be
issued, the affected charter boat meet municipal port
of call requirements. Therefore a certificate of ap-
proval is requested of the city before final action of
the District is taken on the application.
If the certificate or a request for delay for reason is
not received from the city within 45 days, the District
will continue its consideration of the application.
Please execute the enclosed certificate and return i't
to this office so that prompt action can be taken on
the application.
Sincerely,
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Executive Director
FM:jm
enc
MUNICIPAL CERTIFICATION FOR
LIQUOR LICENSE AUTHORIZED PORT OF CALL
APPROVAL FOR 1988
(year)
Under the terms of Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Ordinance #87
the following provision applies:
6.44. Subd. 2. No ports of call shall be authorized
by the Board without first securing a certificate
from the municipality within which such port of
call lies stating that the activities to be conducted
by the applicant at the port of call are in compliance
with municipal zoning laws.
Attached is a copy of the LMCD enabling act, 1986 Laws, Chapter 437,
Section 6.
Merritt Geyen, A1 & Alma's Supper Club, Inc., 5201 Piper Road, Mound, MN 55364
Name and address of liquor license applicant
AL & ALMA'S I, II,iIII, IV,.V and VI
Name of charter boat
5201 Piper Road, Mound
Location of authorized port of call
I certify that the above liquor license applicant has met the zoning
ordinance requirements of Mound for the charter
Municipality
boat described for 1988 and is entitled to a Lake Minnetonka Con-
year
servation District liquor license thereunder.
Authorized signature
Date
3-22-88
goverqing the issuance
~g liquor shall apply to
LIC£.SES.]
Ires, section
the city of Little Fall~
l_~iguor license in addition
IQUOR LICENSES IN CROW WING
!sue not more than two on-salves
o__~n boats pf
rises shall perml~
fic beverages only while th~
moored or anchored offshore~..
t by the codnty board in a5
f the fee charged for ~
Breezy point. Minnesota
!rn the issu~a~ce of license~
~olic beverages under thi~
;lth this section.
ON-S~J~E LICENSE.]
ay issue an on-sale
person, firm, or corporati°--Sn.
~concession services at thee
Mo civic center. ~he lic~
ic center, for consumptio~
~re as shown in enrolled .act
'6
1986 REGULAR SESSION Ch. 437
the licensed premises only. The city council shall ~ix the fee
for the license. Ail provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter
340A, governing intoxicatin~ liquor are applicable to the
license except those which by their nature are inapplicable.
Sec ~ [LAKE MINNETONKA LIQUOR LICENSES.]
Subdivision 1. [DEFI'NITIONS.] (a) .For the purposes of this
section, except where the context requires otherwise, the terms
defined in this section have ,the meanings ~iven them.
(b} "District" means the Lake Minnetonka conservation
district, a public corporation and political subdivision of the
state created pursuant to Laws 1967, chapter 907, as amended b~
Laus 1969, chapter 272.
(c) "Lake" means Lake Minnetonka, ~ennepin and Carver
counties, Minnesota.
Subd. l. [POWERS.] The district is deemed a municipality
.~ithin the meaning of the liquor act, Minnesota Statutes,
'chapter 340A, and, subject to limitations provided· in this
section, has, on the lake, all powers conferred on ..
municipalities by chapter 340A.
Subd. 3. [LIQUOR LICENSES.] The powers of the district
under the liquor act are subject to the following conditions and
limitatio~s: '
(a] Only.. intoxicating on-sale licenses, nonintoxicattn~
malt liquor on-sale licenses, and wine on-sale licenses as
defined in chapter 340A may be issued by the district.
lb) No more than 14 on-sale intoxicating liquor licenses
m~y be issued by the district exclusive of licenses described in
Minnesota Statutes, section 340A.413, subdivision 4.
~JnderscorinG and &tr~k::'-'~--' are as shown in enrolled act
Ch. 437
Ic~ Except as modified by this section, the district has
the powers, conferred by chapter 340A on a statutory city of th~
third class havin~ a populatto~'off 10,000.
"..Idl The district ma~ regulate bottle clubs as .defined in
chapter 340A in the same manner and subject*, to the same
condit$ons as Ss pfovided for cities In chapter 340&.
(e) The district may not establish, own, or operate a
municipal liquor store, either on-sale or off-sale.
Subd. 4.. [JURISDICTIO~.] The district has Jurisdiction
over the sale and possession of any nonintoxicatinq malt liquor
or intoxicatin9 liquor as defined in chapter 340A on or over
waters o~ the lake. Licenses ~ranted b~ the district must
authorize the on'sale o~ intoxicatin~ liquor, nonintoxic~
liquor or wine, or the approval of bottl~ club licenses issued
by the commissioner c~ public safety only on boats or watercra~
which are under way or moored or anchored o~fshore and may not
.autho:ize the on-sale o~ intoxicating liquor, nonintoxicati~
malt liquor Or wine, or the operation of a bottle club on boats
or watercraft while attached to land or to docks, which on-sale
or operation of bottle club~ ma), be authorized only by license
'granted by the municipality havin~ Jurisdiction over the
which the boat or dock is attached. The district may, however.~
impose further regulations or restrictions on any sale or
possession of intoxicattn~ liquor, nonintoxicating malt liquo~
or wine, or the operation of a bottle club on or over the wate~r
of the lake,· ....
Sec, 7. [POPE COUNTY~ SEASO .NAL ON-SALE LICENSE.]
In addition to any other licenses authorized* by lay '~e
county board of Pope county may issue one seasonal on-sale
~ and ~ are as shown in enrolled act
178
03
Rev. 2/85 PERMIT APPLICATION -OFFICE USE ONLY,
' P.A. NO.
i1DEP~TMENT OF TO WORK IN PROTECTED WATERS OR WETLANDS t l - I I
k k Please read instructions before aHempting to complete this application. ~WD. ~USCOE
Applier's Name (Lasl. First. M.I.) IAuthonzed Agent (if apphcable) lTelephone Number&n,-ncw~
~ddress (Street. RFP. Box Number. Ci~. State. Zip Code)
LOCATION OF PROPOSED ~ROJ~CT (BESURE TO INCLUDE SKETCH SHOWING HOW TOGET TO THE SITE)
~overnment Lot(s)~'Oua~er ~n(s)~ JSecti o~s~ o. ~Tow~s) No. Range[s) Ng ,~ ~ JJL°t' Block. Subdivision
~ire~No,~. 'Z~B°x ,o. or~Project~~Address ~, L ~, 1~ ~ IC~~~ ~/~ ma~ & numbe, P,oPc' ~,,I affecl ~ake OWetland o, ~ Wale, co,,se
TYPE OF WORK PROPOSED (CHECKONE) IV. TYPE OF PROJECT (CHECK ONE) ~~ ~
~excavate ~ repmr ~ shoreline ~ shore-protection ~ obstruction ~ dam
~ fill ~ remove ~ channel ~ harbor O bridge ~ other
~ drain ~ abandon
~ sand blanket ~permanent dock O culvert (specify)
~ construct ~ other (specify)
O install ~ riprap ~ wharf
~[~IMATED_ ~0JE~ COST $ VI. LENGTH OF SHORELINE AFFECTED (IN FEET):
VOLUME OF MATERIAL FILLED OR EXCAVATED (IN CUBIC YARDS):
uPLANATIONOF PROJECT:(EXPLAIN WHA~ PROJECT CONSISTS OF AND HOW WORK WILL BE DONE
P~RPOSE OF PROJECT: (~xplain ~hy Ibis project is needed)
~ON~EN~ I~P~ (Anticipated changes to the water and related land resources, including unavoidable but detrimental effects)
ill[~lll~ (Other allemalives Io lhe action propose~)
I hereby make apphcahon pursuant 1o Minnesota Statules Chapler 105 42 and all supporling rules for a permd to work in or aflecl the above named prolecled
water(s) in accordance wdh all Supporling maps?plans and olher informalion submilled wdh this application The information submitled and statements made
concmn,nq th~s application are true and correct lo lhe be$1 of my knowledge
S'gnahlr i, of lease~ / / Date
Distribution:
.:.;,,;;;;;:;;:.-;.-;:;;;;;;;,,,¢,¢~,,,' White: DNR I ~'~
'~ ~ ll,.~,J. NOTAJ~Y PUBLIC - MINNESOTA _'~ . Watershed District
" ~' T' (-~r~rtPnrr, d: Ci~/ or Countv
/
& /I
--/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
.\
\
RECEIVED ,¥,,-,, 1 9 1988
~ /,, ~, £ ~ ,¢ ~ ,b J 7%.
I
(.,...;~ 2>//-:
,.,. · ~
?/. ':~ ,..., / ~" ~ - 7" ~1'
/
September 22~ 1987
RESOLUTION NO. 87- 182
RESOLUTION GRANTING FRONT YARD AND LAKESHCRE SETBACK VARIANO~S FOR
· THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOME ON LOTS
1.-4, BLOCK 6, DREAMWOOD; PID NO. 13-117-24 21 0004/0005.
~HEREAS, the applicant has applied for a 20 foot front yard setback
variance and a 13 foot lakeshore setback variance for the purpose of
constructing a single family detached residential structure at 1649 Bluebird
Lane; PID No. 13-117-24 21 0004/0005; ar~
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-3 Two Family
Residential zoning district which, according to the City Code, requires a 30
foot front yard setback and a 50 foot lakeshore setback; and
~EREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request; and
· ~%~EREAS, the proposed variances are consistent with the criteria for
granting variances found in Section 23.506.1 of the City Code. ..
NC~, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the 20 foot front yard setback variance and the 13 foot
lakeshore setback variance are hereby granted subject to the review and
approval of the applicant's grading plan by the watershed district.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Mayor Smith and seconded by
Councilmember Abel.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmatiYe:
Abel, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The f01]owing Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
McCornbs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
Twin Cities St. Cloud
15050 23rd Ave. N.
Plymouth, MN
55447
May 25, 1988
Telephone
612/476-6010
Engineers
Planners
Surveyors
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City of Mound
53~1 Naywood Road
Hound, MN 55364
SUB3ECT:
Public Works Building
Waste Oil Storage Tank
MFRA #8257
Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
As requested at your last meeting, we have assembled additional information
on the different alternatives available for storage of waste oil at the new
Public Works Building. First of all, the following are the temporary stanOarOs
which remain in effect until the MPCA adopts permanent technical rules. This
will not be done until the EPA establishes their final form of the law,
sometime this-year or early 1989.
The present standards for new U.G. tanks are:
Tank is constructed to be compatible with the stored substances;
Tank is 'either made from non-corrosive material, or is steel encased
in non-corrosive material;
Tank is cathodically protected from corrosion, or otherwise designed
to prevent release of stored substances; and
Tank is installed according to specific requirements (A.P.i. Bulletin
No. 1615, 11/79) and all manufacturer's recommendations.
As far as we can determine, the bid we have received in the amount of
$6,400.00 for installation of a 560 gallon U.G. steel tank, cathodicaliy
protected, meets all of the present requirements. As i stated at your last
meeting, this installation probably will not meet the new requirements that the
EPA and MPCA are considering. It is anticipated that existing installations
will need to follow definite requirements when the new laws are passed, such as
installing some type of monitoring system to detect any leaks.
The only sure way to proceed with this installation and meet future
regulations under consideration would be to install a double walled Fiberglass
Reinforced Plastic (FRP) tank or encase the steel tank in a concrete vault.
This includes the piping as well. Some type of leak detection will most likely
be required. An installation such as this would cost approximately $14,000.00,
depending on the type of leak detection used.
Formerly McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc.
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
May 19, 1988
Page Two
The Council also asked about the possibility of using an above-ground tank
inside the building. According to the building inspector and fire chief, we
would be limited to a total flammable storage of 180 gallons, which would ndt
be adequate. A larger tank could be used, but this would change the rating on
this area of the building, which would require alterations, resulting in
substantial additional expense. Attached is a letter from regarding this
subject from Jan Bertrand.
The following summarizes the choices available to the City:
Steel Tanks as bid - cost
Hennepin County Recycling Program
City of Mound
Double Wall FRP tank estimated cost
Hennepin County Recycling Program
City of Mound
$ 6,400.00
$ 3,840.00
$ 2,560.00
$ 8,400.00.
$ 5,600.00
Above ground inside storage estimated
cost (limited to approx. 180 gallons) $ 600.00
Hennepin County Recycling Program $ 360.00
City of Mound $ 240.00
I will be available at the Council meeting on Tuesday, May 24, 1988, to
answer any questions you may have.
Very truly yours,
McCOIqBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Cameron
JC:jmj
CITY
of MOUND
53,~t MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(6i2) 472-1155
TO: Ed Schukle, City Manager
FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official
SUBJECT: Public Works Waste Oil tank and flammible/combustible storage
DATE: May 17, 1988
The City Engineer, John Cameron, asked me to respond to the possibility
of storing waste oil within the new public works facility building
instead of underground as originally planned. I did a plan review
on the building using the uses of B-2, office; H-4 repair garage;
and B-l, storage garage for vehicles. If the building is used for
the storage of quantities of combustible and flammible liquids in
excess of the amounts established under the Uniform Building Code
for the H-4, repair garage use it would require modifications to
the building as it presently was approved. This change would
constitute physical fire rated separation of one hour rated construction.
The waste oil tank is considered a flammible storage use due to the
fact that we can not govern the amounts of forei~at~rials added to
the oil. The combination o~i fiammz-i~quids within the H-4,
~ erepair garage with the building fully sprinklered is 180 gallons.
If you have any questions or need further information, I'll be happy
to try and clarify.
cc: Don Bryce, Fire Chief
88/46
An equa', opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of rac£. color, nationa: ori.c:n, or hand;caT, peal in the admission or access to. or treatment or emp!oyment in. ~ts programs a?,d activities
RECEIVED OF Stevena.
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Minnetonka
and Beth Homola as Husband
.Mt~. May R tern
and W~fe '
thesumol FTVR. ~4UND~ED AND 00/1O0, ($500.00 ~L~
. (~k, ~lh or Note--S~le Which)
~STEDGE RO~. MOUND MN
si~ua~ in t~ ~nty o~ HENN ., . St,t, o~ M~n~t,..~ ~.fl~ ~.~ .~ ~o,~,. to w,: * SEE SUPPLANT
FOR LEG~ DESCRIPTION
(including venellln bllnOs), curlltfl ~dl, Ire~rel ~1, drl~ry r~l, lighting fixtures Ihd bulbs, plumbing flxturel, ~t water tanks and heating plant (with
any burners, tlnk~, slokerm And other equipment used In ~nnectlon therewith), w~ler softener a~ liquid ga~ tank and controls (11 the pro~ of eelle~,
sump pump, television intlnnk Incinerator, built-In dllhwaaher and garbage distill, built-In ovens, built.in c~k top stoves, All altached mirrors, garage
Including alee the Iollowlflg ~mOflll ~y, which ~ywr m=kflowll~el la not new and II iold Iff "il Ii" ~fldltl~.
Elr~stm~ey~relnpai0S~ - ~ Ind$ 5:~00 . ~ .~sh,~f~e J~ 30 ~ 1988 .t~teofcl~t~.
T~
l
"~ I and the earnest mo~ey cheCk mull be Immeclielely returned If this purchase agr~nt Is rejeCte(I.
· ,ndme~mnceot:$24 , 000. 00 byflnenclngeeepe¢tt/edlnCONTRaCT FOR DEED IInanclngeupptement.
(e} Rights Ot tenants es Iollows: (unless specllied, not su~ect to tenancies).
~ebwerlhlllplythe PRO~TE FROM CDOSING rl~leltltetMeld~lndplylblelflthlylU19 88,.~llllllrlhlllplylhl
~O~ ~O C~OS [~ mai estele taxes due and ~yable In Ihs yeu 1~ ~ and any unpaid InsLaH~nls of I~ill.saes~nll payable
therewith. Selle~ we.ants that reai estltl texee due In t~ ~ar 19 8 9 will ~ ~0N ~meslead classificlti~.
Buyer ~ ~ller ~T,T,
Buyer Icknowlldgll receipt of Iny t~th tn ~ullflg m~ and/or ~l ~mplllfl~ required by I~1 o~lfllncl. ~ /~
Buy~¢l lnltlil.
LOCATED ON S~PREMtSES ARE IN PROPER WORKING ORDER A~ATE OF C~OS~NG. ~n
Seller w~anls mai cHy sewer Is In the street ~ NO ~ and connected to the house, Yes ~ NO d 1~at city water Is In the itreel,
Yes [~ No ~and connecle~ to the house, Yes ~ No~ , -
oper.tin~expenses, shal~m~easof ~ O~ ~O~S~O~ ·
delault, Merrill Lynch ResltylBumet will not make il legal Interpretation of any provisions relating to disbursement of lamest mo. nlel.
Buyer icknowledgel no itatlmeflts hive been midi by leller or ~el eltate salespersons regarding pOlllbll problems of Wlltr In the
blllmlflt, or dlmlgl ClUlld by Wltlr or Icl build.up on the roD! of the ibove dalcrlbed properly, unllll noted on ittlchld Iddifldum Ifl~
buylr rlltll lO,ely upon personal tfllpectlon of the prope~y and on the Iollowtng Itltlment by Ihs iiIllr, SetTer ~l~ll not) hid I
basement, and ~T hid r~f, will or coiling dlmlgl CluIld by seeped, of witlr.
(h~s~as not)
Check one ,
~ Seller icknowledgll providing, and Buyer Icknowlldgll receiving i Itltlmlnt of prope~y condition Off attached iddendum.
~ Buyer Icknowledg~l Sellpr hll not provided I Ii.lament gl prope~y condition and Buyer rellll solely off his own In~cllon of Ihs Fop~y.
Seller(s) Inltlall Buyer(s) Inltlsll
I, Ihs undersigned, owner of the above land. do hereby approve the
Seller Dale
THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT UNDERSTOOD, SEEK COMPETENT LEGAL ADVICE.
ORIGINAL--Closing Dept. COPY 1--Seller COPY 2--Buyer COPY 3--Listing Associate COPY 4--Selling AssoCllle COPY 5--Mortgage
I Is unde stoocl end ag eed ha h i leis is made sub ec o he approval by he seller of said premises, In writing WhiCh approval, agent has . ,
deyl to obtain, eno thai Ihs undersigned agent is Iff no mailer liable or respons bls on account of his agreement, excep O return or account for the earnest
money paid under this contract. /
,Z~. ("~ ~i~. l~'~r~ ltlpulllel that he/she Ii rlpreslflll~ the ~ ~T,L~ In this
LIsling agent or listing broker Itip¢llll that hi/she Il fep~lsenting the seller in this IrlntlclJ~.
The detlvety of all papers and monies shall ~ made et the Office o1: MERRILL LYNCH R/ALTYIBURNET. INC.
By
Sales Ass~iate
I ~reby ag eeo purchase the sa~d p~o~rty for the price and u~n Ihe~
term~ove ~oned..n0 ~,~ct Lo ,~1 coCOons here~ exp, essed.
' - Buyer ~' / Da e
80N
V"I
I
X
s-
·
--Ir
>-
X
D. gL
133
r~
r,
r,
-.ir
t
X
o
MARION
CYPRESS
LA ~ ~
ZTe.~
N
NOB
c3
0 ~n
ZO~
'i,'
-.4
°
XZ
:z'om
o o
0
0-4
o~
o~
Oo
t~
0
-4 m
°
-4O
X'~
pm~r~
.-.1""'
'~' -.4
~"0
X
~X
,.-I
.-.I
I-4
'"z'
-,1
I u nat FINANCING SUPPLEMENT TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Contrac. t for Deed
GO~NT LOT 4 ~STEDGE ~- MOUN~ r ~
~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ' the ~alance Old,he 0u~chase price, by cont~t f~ de~ {197~ Minn, Unll~ Bl~nk) ~tw~n ~eller a~ pumn~er payable
Inlt~llmen~of$ 200. OO ~e~ntP~,lttheoptlonofl~uYer, lnclud~nglnte~e~tattherateof ] ~ */~ ~rannumc~put~on
un~ldbalance~,lnterestahallmnfrom~ ~0: ~9~Fimtpl~entahall~aueandpayable~O 3; ~qRR .~n~sub~auent
~ayme~t~ ~hall ~ due and ply~ble ~ t~ ~S ~gay ol eech ~ucce~ing month. Payments s~a31 ~ credtt~ first to interest an~ remamOe~ to
prlnclpaL~en~re~atance~fthll~ntr~c~=h~l~uel~pl~ablelnlull~lalerthan ~O9~ 3~, ~99S o~
success:~ ss~e s~ c~os;~g o~ ~u~e~s p~ese~S home a5 6690 Co~s~Se 9~.
E$CROWFOR~ESANDINSU~NC~ ~e~ ~:~e~ w~c~e~e~ comes
~e Buyers) - ~ ...~ .~ ...... h. ~ I~l~ed tn and n add tton to t~ m~tnly payment a~e
DUE ON ~L~
~ Buyer(s) ( Y Y , n s r~ u red ~a ~t to~h In t~e pmceO nO
Buyers) interest In thl;contrac% wllbout the pr or writ an consent of the Se e~s). n the e~n, tn. written ~se
,nd payable un0er this Contrsct for ~ shsli ~ paid In ruB, However, this provision d~s no?pply to transfers by Oedse, aesc , Y
UNDE~LYINO FINANC NO ment th~eun~e t~
SELLER'5 CONTINOENCY: YII ~ No ~ '/,.
ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
*LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 LYING NORTHERLY OF
~[HE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY SECTION 2~ TO~q.q~TP ~17 ~ANC~ ~4 HE~TNTP~TN
~ T ~
_ n~'~.~ T.~ ~n~'I'TUG'~m T~n~ m~4~T~ ~'~TUm. ACC~$$ F~R _~LTY~RS ZNG_~--~-~$ .
MERRILL LYNCH RF. ALTYIBURNET, iNC.
IH~S ~S A ~5~A~[Y ~;ND~NG ~ONIRACI. ~F NOI UND~RSIOOQ, S55K CO~P~SNI ~GA~ ADV~,
RESOLUTION APPRO¥ING THE RELIEF ASSOCIATION'S
REQUEST TO INCREASE PENSION BENEFITS AS REQUESTED
WHEREAS, the Fire Department Relief Association has had
its Actuarial Study done for 1987; and
WHEREAS, they are now requesting an increase in pension
benefits from $290.00 per month to $350.00 per month, effective
July 1, 1988; and
WHEREAS, there are adequate funds in this fund to allow
these increases.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the Fire
Department Relief Association's request to an increase in pension
benefits as follows:
$350.00 per month, effective July 1, 1988.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
April 29, 1988
TO:
Fran Clark, City Clerk
FROM: Dave Carlson, Mound Fire Department
SUBJECT:
Mound Fire Department Relief Association
Actuarial Study and Proposal to Adjust
the Pension Benefit
Enclosed please find two copies of a letter and
an actuarial study which the Fire Department Relief
Association would like to have distributed to the
city manager, the city finance director, the city
mayor, and the city councilmembers for consideration.
Could you notify Don Bryce or myself as to whether
this item would go directly to a city council meeting
agenda and when or if some prior discussion is desired.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions
concerning this matter.
Thank you,
DJC/gm
Enclosures
David Carlson
Home: 472-5485
Work: 544-0341
Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364
April 28, 1988
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Councilmembers:
The Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association
recently contracted with Bordewick & Company to conduct an
actuarial study for our retirement fund. The study was
conducted based on monies in this fund as of December 31,
1987. A copy of the actuarial study is attached for your
review.
The actuarial study was conducted to determine current normal
costs and accrued liabilities based on actuarial assumptions
required by state law. Another objective of this study was
to determine the costs of increasing the benefit levels from
the current $290.00 per month. The actuarial study contains
discussions of the purpose, the current assets, the impact or
benefit increases, the benefit plan outline, the actuarial
assumptiOns, and the member statistics.
The Relief Association Pension Fund is currently supported by
combination of 2% State Aid and city contributions. In 1987
the 2% State Aid was $42,194.00 and has historically
increased each year with increasing property values within
our coverage area. In 1988 the city is contributing
$53,147.04 or $4,428.92 per month. Therefore, even assuming
the 2% State Aid stays constant, the total funding for 1988
should total $95,341.04.
Page five of the actuarial study contains a chart which shows
the annual contribution requirements for various benefit
levels of $290.00 per month up to $325.00 per month. Page
five-A is a letter which supplements the chart on page five
and shows annual contribution requirements for benefit levels
of $340.00 per month and $350.00 per month. Based on an
annual funding of $95,341.04 the study shows the relief
association has assets to pay a $350.00 per month benefit.
This increase is due to a good return on pension fund
investments and steady increases in contributions from the
city.
The Relief Association Board of Director would like to
propose a benefit increase to $350.00 per month effective
July 1, 1988. This increase will not require additional
Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
- 2 -
April 28, 1988
funding from the city, but does require the city council's
approval. We feel the benefit increase is necessary to
continue to attract quality firefighters to our department.
Just as important, the benefit increase will help encourage
current firefighters who have had an extensive amount of
training to remain on the department to earn retirement
benefits. With the greater demand on the individual's time,
it is becoming more difficult to find people to volunteer the
necessary time to be a good firefighter.
Firefighting has changed a lot in recent years. With
Community Right-To-Know laws and SARA Title III requirements,
we must become familiar with hazardous materials and how to
handle incidents involving them. The concerns with AIDS has
impacted our personnel and each member has been issued
special equipment to help prevent exposure during a medical
emergency. We have moved into the computer age and
are beginning to put records into a computer format. Our
department is well equipped with many different special tools
that help us do our job better. All of these areas have
required additional training for our firefighters and often
involving commitments of many hours of their own time.
One of the reasons our firefighters have been willing to
commit this extra time is the pension benefit which we are
proposing to increase. This retirement benefit is also a
great asset in attracting qualified candidates to fill
openings in our department. An approval of the proposal to
increase the pension benefit to $350.00 per month will help
us to continue to maintain a strong, capable fire department.
If there is agreement with our proposal, we will need an
approved motion by the Mound City Council and a letter for
our files. The city council approval is required since the
city makes contributions to our pension fund.
I hope this letter adequately discusses the attached
actuarial study and the proposed benefit increases. If
questions remain or any of you would like to discuss our
proposal, please contact us.
Sincerely,
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION
David Carlson
President
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE
DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC,
ACTUARIAL-VALUATION
DECEMBER 31,' 1987
IAqF
E~ORDEWtCK ,~ CO.
BORDEWICK & CO.
ACTUARIES AND CONSULTANTS
724 10HI~,$ LANE
EDINA. MN
March 3, 1988
Board of Trustees
Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association, Inc.
P.O. Box 37
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Attention: Mr. David J. Carlson, President
Gentlemen:
Attached is the report which presents the results of the December 31, 1987
Actuarial Valuation of the Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association,
Inc.
I certify that all calculations with respect to the valuation were performed
on the basis of the assumptions and methods outlined in the Exhibits of the
report and the results are correct to the best of my knowledge.
The Actuarial Valuation was conducted in accordance with my understanding of
the applicable provisions of Chapter 69.733 and Chapter 356 of the Minnesota
Statutes.
Sincerely,
James R. Bordewick, F.S.A.
JRB:cah
Attachment
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC.
ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1987
INTRODUCTION
Chapter 356.216 of Minnesota Statutes requires that an actuarial valuation
of the fund be conducted periodically.
An actuarial valuation is a calculation to determine the normal cost and
accrued liability of the fund and includes a determination of the payment
necessary to amortize the unfunded liability over a stated period and a
determination of the payment necessary to keep the unfunded liability from
increasing.
The actuarial valuation is conducted according to a stated actuarial cost
method, Entry Age Normal Cost, and, as prescribed in Chapter 356.215,
Subdivision 4(4), an interest assumption of 5% must be utilized.
The By-Laws of the Association were amended to provide for a monthly
service pension of $280 on July 1, 1986 and again on January 1, 1987 to
provide for a monthly service pension of $290.
MEMBERSHIP
There were 36 activemembers and 17 inactive members or beneficiaries
included in the actuarial costs. Member statistics are shown in Exhibit B
and C.
ASSUMPTION CHANGES
The actuarial assumptions are shown in Exhibit D. There were no changes
in the actuarial assumptions from the previous actuarial valuation.
-1-
BORDEWICK ~: CO.
ASSETS
Chapter 356.20, Subdivision 4 as applied to firefighter's relief associations
enumered in Chapter 69.771 and 69.773 of the Minnesota Statutes requires that
assets be reported on a basis which is approximately a cost basis. However,
it is our opinion that the asset basis for the actuarial valuation can be on
a different basis and we have continued the practice of using market value.
The market value of the assets on December 31, 1987 was $902,557.50 and
the cost value on the same date was $918,695.89.
The table below shows the development of the market value from the last
actuarial valuation which was December 31, 1985.
Market Value, 12-31-85
$710,882
Receipts
Contributions $174,052
Investment Income
152,934
Realized Capital Gains
20,468
$347,454
Disbursements
Benefit Payments
$100,003
Expenses 13,354
$113,357
Net Income $234,097
Unrealized Depreciation
Market Value, 12-31-87
($ 42,421)
$902,558*
* Reflects accrued trustees fees for 1987 of $237
-2-
BORDEWICK ~: Co.
ACTUARIAL BALANCE SHEET
The actuarial balance sheet showing accrued assets and liabilities is shown
below as of December 31, 1987.
Assets
Market Value of current assets
Unfunded accrued liability
Present value of future normal costs
Liabilities
Present value of benefits - active members
inactive members
$ 902,558
378,156
310,935
$1,591,649
$ 874,742
716,907
$1,591,649
'3-
BORDEWICK ~ CO.
ANALYSIS OF CHANGE IN UNFUNDED ACCRUED LIABILITY
The unfunded accrued liability increased by $26,277 from December 31, 1985
to December 31, 1987. The analysis of this change is shown below:
1. Unfunded Accrued Liability, 12-31-85
$351,879
Amount By Which Contributions Were
Greater Than Normal Costs And
Interest Requirements.
70,514
3. Increase In Accrued Liability Due To
Benefit Increases
169,456
4. Actuarial Gain For The Period
72,665
5. Unfunded Accrued Liability, 12-31-87:
(1) - (2) + (3) - (4)
378,156
The actuarial gain of $72,665 was prima'rily due to investment earnings in
excess of the actuarial assumption of 5% and the reserves released by the
removal of one widow from payment status.
CONTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS
Section 69.773, Subdivision 4 of the Minnesota Statutes states that the
contribution requirement is equal to the normal cost and amortization of
the unfunded-accrued liability by December 31, 2001 in this case.
The normal cost is $29,818 and the contribution requirement as of December
31, 1987 is $66,202.
The contribution required to keep the unfunded accrued liability from
increasing is $50,217 on December 31, 1987.
IMPACT OF BENEFIT INCREASES
It was requested that we determine the financial impact of benefit increases
to active and inactive members. The current benefit level is $290 a month.
For every $10 increase in the monthly benefit, the normal cost will increase
by $1,026 and the accrued liability by $44,163. The increase in the accrued
liability is amortized over 20 years by statute and a new amortization
period is determined for the entire unfunded accrued liability. The
amortization period may be extended depending on the size of the increase
in the accrued liability.
We have developed the contributions for various benefit levels on an asset
basis equal to market value. The contribution requirement under the $290
benefit level is shown on this basis for comparison.
-4-
BQRDEWICK & CO.
IMPACT OF BENEFIT INCREASES
Unfunded Accrued
Liability
Full Funding Date:
December 31
Annual Contribution
Requirement
EXHIBITS
$290 $300 $310 $320 $325
$378,156 $422,319 $466,482 $510,645 $532,727
2001 2001 2002 2002 2002
$ 66,202 $ 71,477 $ 74,672 $ 79,750 $ 82,289
Five exhibits are attached to this report. They are:
Exhibit A ..... Plan Outline
Exhibit B ..... Member Statistics
Exhibit C ..... Age/Service Distribution of Active Members
Exhibit D ..... Actuarial Assumptions
Exhibit E ..... Actuarial Funding Method
l 6q
-5-
RORDEWICK & CO.
BORDEWICK & CO.
ACTUARIES AND CONSULTANTS
OHMS LANE
EDINA, MN $54.35
March 17, 1988
Mr. David J. Carlson
4722 Gordon Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re: Mound Volunteer Fire Department
Relief Association, Inc.
Dear Dave:
This letter is a supplement to the portion of the December 31, 1987 Actuarial
Report dealing with the impact of benefit increases.
If the benefit was increased to $340 or $350, the results on page 5 of the
Actuarial Report would be:
Unfunded Accrued Liability
Full Funding Date: December 31
Annual Contribution Requirement
$340 $350
$598,971 $643,134
2,003 2,003
87,598 92,505
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
JRB:cah
James .~B~rdewick, F.S.A.
Five -A /~ i{ ~'
EXHIB~ITS
BORDEWICK ~ CO.
EXHIBIT A
PLAN OUTLINE
ELIgIBILiTY: Member of The Mound Volunteer ~re Department Rel~e¢
Association, Inc. after having served a one year probationary period.
SERVICE REQUIREMENT: The later of age 50 or after completion of 20 years
of service. Must retire at age 60.
The monthly benefit payable is $290.
DEFERRED PENSION: Retirement prior to age 50 with 20 years of service.
The monthly benefit payable at age 50 is $290.
DISABILITY PENSION: Disability which prevents the member from performing
duties for at least two weeks.
The monthly benefit payable is $290 per month prorated per day.
DEATH AND SURVIVOR BENEFITS: These benefits are applicable if the member
dies prior to or after retirement.
FUNERAL BENEFIT: $1,500
WIDOWS AND CHILDRENS BENEFITS: Widow receives 75% of member's
monthly pension for life or until remarriage.
Surviving children receive 25% of member's monthly pension until
age 18 or marriage.
If the event of death of member and wife, children receive $'290
per month until age 18 or marriage.
The maximum family benefit is $290 per month.
-6-
E~ORDEWICK & CO.
ACTIVE MEMBERS
EXHIBIT B
MEMBER STATISTICS
There were 36 active members included in the actuarial costs. An age/
service distribution is shown in Exhibit C.
The average entry age (age at membership) for the 36 active members is.
24.4.
RETIRED MEMBERS
1. There were 13 retired members included in the actuarial costs.
2. The total annual retirement benefits payable to these members is $45,240.
3. The average retirement age for these members has been age 52.2 and
average current age of these members is age 64.8.
SURVIVORS OF MEMBERS
1. There were 2 widows included in the actuarial costs.
2. The total annual widow's benefits payable is $5,220.
OTHER
1. Four members terminated since January l, 1986. Two members are currently
vested.
e
There has been 5 disabilities paid to three participants since January l,
1986. These disabilities were temporary disabilities. There have been
no permanent disabilities since January 1, 1979.
-7-
BORDEWlCK 8~ CO.
EXHIBIT C
AGE/SERVICE DISTRIBUTION OF ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS
DECEMBER 31, 1987
Age* 0-1 2-4
15-19
20-24 2
25-29 2 4
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65+
Total 4 4
COMPLETED YEARS OF SERVICE
5-9 lO-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30+ Total
2
2 8
3 1 4
2 9 11
2 1 3
2 1 3 6
1 1 2
7 12 4 5 36
Average Age = 36.1
Average Service = 10.9 years
*Nearest birthday
-8-
E~ORDEWICK ~ Co.
EXHIBIT D
ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
MORTALITY:
1971 Group Annuity Mortality Table.
MEMBER TURNOVER:
None assumed.
DISABILITY:
Age retirement costs loaded 1%.
RETIREMENT:
The later of age 53 or after 20
years of service.
INTEREST:
5%, compounded annually.
MARITAL STATUS:
85% of members in payment status
were assumed to be married with a
spouse two years younger than the
member.
ASSET BASIS:
Market value.
-9- BORDEWlCX 8( CO.
EXHIBIT '[
ACTUARIAL FUNDING METHOD
ENTRY AGE NORMAL
This actuarial funding method is one of the family of projected benefit
cost methods. An estimate of the projected benefits expected to be payable
under the plan is required to determine the costs and liabilities with
this funding method.
The NORMAL COST for each active member is the annual amount required from
the member's entry date to retirement date so that the accumulated contributions
at termination or retirement will equal the liability at that time. This
cost is expressed as a level annual amount.
The PRESENT VALUE OF FUTURE BENEFITS is equal to the value of the future
benefits expected to be payable discounted back to the member's current age.
Discounts include such items as mortality, turnover, interest, and any other
decremental assumptions. The value includes the value of benefits for both
active and inactive members.
The PRESENT VALUE OF FUTURE NORMAL COSTS is equal to the value of the future
NORMAL COSTS for the active members discounted for the decrements described
above and payable from the member's current age to retirement age.
The ACCRUED LIABILITY is equal to the difference between the PRESENT VALUE OF
FUTURE BENEFITS and the PRESENT VALUE OF FUTURE NORMAL COSTS.
The UNFUNDED LIABILITY is equal to the difference between the ACCRUED LIABILITY
and the current valuation assets.
ACTUARIAL GAINS AND LOSSES are reflected in adjustments to the UNFUNDED
LIABILITY from year to year.
-1 O- BORDEWICK ~ CO.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-
CITY OF MOUND
WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Mound
to participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 15
within the limits of said municipality, and
WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Commissioner of
Transportation and identified in his records as S.A.R. No. 27-615-14 and
M.S.A.P. No. 145-020-09,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: that we do hereby appropriate from our
Municipal State-Aid Street Funds the sum of $ 260,000.00 dollars to apply
toward the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of
Transportation to approve this authorization.
CERTZFZCATION
I, Fran Clark, duly appointed and qualified Clerk in and for the City of
Mound, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that the above is a true and full
copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council of said City assembled in
regular session on the 24th day of May, 1988.
City Clerk
City of Mound, Minnesota
HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY 15 PRO3ECTS
STREET STREET WATERMAIN
IMPROVEMENTS LIGHTS REPLACEMENT
TOTAL
PRO3ECTS
Total Est. Proj. $ 264,4~8.38
Cost Incl. Engr/
Legal/Fisca!/Admin.
$ 179,600.00
$ 80,000.00 $ 524,038.38
LESS State Aid ~/~3c~/~:.'
Reimbursement - 170,200.00 - 89,800.00 -0- - 260,000.00
Water Fund -0- -0- - 55,000.00 - 55,000.00
Amount of Bonding $ 94,238.~8 $ 89,800.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 209,0~8.~8'
LESS Assessments - 169,794.00 - 89,800.00
-0- - 259,594.00
Projected Fund
Balance +$ 75,555.62 -0- (-$25,000.00) +$ 50,555.62
Amount to be bonded providing Hennepin County will wait for payment until City
receives reimbursement from State Aid.
Revised 4/25/88
Revised 5/19/88
RESOLUTION NO. 88-
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ACCEPTING HENNEPIN COUNTY'S BID PRICES
FOR THE ADDITIONAL STREET LIGHT IMPROVEMENT
ON COUNTY ROAD 15 BETWEEN FAIRFIEW LANE AND THE SETON BRIDGE
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution %88-71, passed by the
City Council on April 26, 1988, the City Engineer (McCombs Frank
Roos) has prepared plans and specifications for the additional
street light improvement on County Road 15 between Fairview Lane
and the Seton Bridge; and
WHEREAS, these plans and specifications have been
presented to the Council for approval; and
WHEREAS,
Hennepin
county's a g -a st ction cost
for these additional street lights is
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota:
Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is at-
tached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby ap-
proved.
Accepts Hennepin County's estimated construction cost
for these additional street lights (on County Road 15
between Fairview Lane and the Seton Bridge) of
$52,643.00.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Board of Managers
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
mAY 2 ~ ~988
Eugene A. Hickok and Associates
May 19, 1988
Lake Level, Flow and Precipitation Summary for April 1988
Lake levels in Lake Minnetonka have remained at approximately 928 in April as
illustrated by the attached graph and lake elevations. There has not been any
discharge from Lake Minnetonka to Minnehaha Creek since November 17, 1986.
Creek flow at the Browndale Ave. dam in Edina during April is shown below.
The 30 year average precipitation for March at the National Weather Service
station in Maple Plain is 2.35 inches. The actual precipitation recorded in
Wayzata for March was .95 inches. A summary of precipitation follows.
MaPle -Plain
Minneapolis-St. Paul
International Airport
Wayzata
PRECIPITATION SUMMARY
Actual
April --
April 1.58
Apri 1 O. 95
30.Year Average
2.35
2.05
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
~ril 4
~ril 6
~ril 8
~ri 1 11
~ri 1 13
~ril 15
~ril 18
~ril 20
~ril 22
~ril 25
)ri 1 27
)ril 29
MONTHLY FLOW SUMMARY
Grays Bay
(cfs)
Browndale Ave. Dam
(cfs)
7.5
7.5
10.3
4.1
4.1
2.8
3,2
2.5
1.1
4.5
8.0
4.5
g30.O0
LAKE MINNETONKA
Water Levels 1987-1988
NOHW[g2g.4)
RUNOUT ELEVATION(928
929.80
929.60
929.40
929.20
929.00
928.80
928.50
928.40
928.20
928.00
927.80
927.60
927.40
927.20
927.00
09-Jan-87
01-Jul-87 31--Aug--87 05--J~n--88 17-May-88
DATE
Date Elevation F!~ D~t= =~' '~"" Flow ~ "~-
.._ua ..... Date Elevation Flow Date
_ . E, eva~,~,, Flow
09-Jan-8? 928.58 0.00 06-Ju!-87 927.48 0.~0 .....08-Sep-87 928.52 0.00 ~-re~,~-~.~8%?..~ =' 0.00
2!-Jan-87 ~8..'.--'7 0.00 14-Jul-87 927.45 0.00 14-Sep-87 928.48 0.00 25-Feb-88 927.96 0.00
.... ~- ~-~* 0.00 07-Mar-88 927.96 0.00
5~Jan-87 928.58 0.0~ 16-Jui-87 e27.37 0.00 .~ Se~ ~/ 928.55
05-Feb-8? 928.40 O ..... n~_~.¢_o~ ~, 6~, ~ ...
...... u ..... ~./ ........... ~u~ ...... 47 0,00 15-Mar-88 ?8 o~) 0.00
18-Feb-87 928.~55 OFF 22-Ju!-87 927.71 0.'¥) 25-Sep-87 928.44 0.00
z,-~.~r-~ ~2~.06 0.00
26-Feb-87 e~° ~* 0.00 =, .u. 8. 928.62 0.CKi no_c=~_o~ ~ 42 0.00 928.
~ "" ~ ' ~.00 05-0ct-87 YZ~.SZ 0.00 04-Apr-88 928.14 0.00
06-Mar-87 928.~ 0,00 =,-d~,-8, 92~.75 ¢' ~'~
15-Mm~-87 .... 0.00 ~-.l,~-~ ." ,~-n~+-07 o~ ,? 0.(i¢) 06-Apr-88 928.16 0.00
9~. 0.00 3(~Ju1-87 928.79 ¢).(( 16-Oct-87 928.16 O.t)o 11-Apr-88 928.14 0.00
06-Apr-87 9~.28 0.00 5!-Jul-87 928.81 0.00 20-0ct-87 928.!5 0.00 15-Apr-~9 928.16 0,00
,,,-~p,-8, = .25 O.(X) 03-Aug-87 928.8! 0.00 26-0ct-87 928.12 0.00 18-Apr-88 9~8. z0 0.00
.... ~, ~, 928.20 0,00 06-Aug-B7 928.78 0.00 02-Nov-B7 928,n6 0.00 25-Apr-B8 ~B.06 0.00
27-Apr-87 928.22 0.00 10-Aug-97 928.79 0,00 09-N~v-87 928.[~ 0,00 2B-Apr-B8 928.08 0.~1
(~ M 03-May-B8 928.00 0.00
- ay-87 928.22 0.(~ II-Aug-87 928.77 0,00 16-Nov-87 ~8.04 0.00
12-May-87 928.2~ 0.~ 17-Aug-87 928.85 0.00 24-Nov-87 928.00 0.~) 06-Mmy-88 928.00 0.00
21-May-B7 927.94 0.00 18-Aug-87 928.85 0.00 0!-Dec-87 928.10 0.00 09-May-88 928.14 0.00
28-May-87 927,95 (~ .... 00 19-Aug-87 928.79 0.00 07-Dec-87 928.08 0.00 l'<.-,~ay-8o" ' 928.04 0.00
OS-Jun-87 ~7,89 0.00 24-Aug-87 928.72 0.00 14-Dec-87 928.08 0.00 17-May-S8 928.00 0.00
15-Jun-87 927.68 0.OJ 26-Aug-87 928.65 0.00
,.,-¢,n-ou 927.86 0.00 19-May-88 927.96 O. tX~
25-Jun-87 ~7.67 0.00 51-Aug-87 ~8.65 0.00 19-Jan-88- 927.88 0,00
01-Jul-87. 927.55 0,00 01-Sep-87 928.64 0.00 05-Feb-88 927.96 0.00
*NOTE: The zero elevation for the lake gauge was adjusted down 0.22 feet.
Thzs adjustment was ef,;=ctive,,_ ¢ant~ry' ,' 1,1988.
SiX MONTH 'PRECIPITATION RECORDED
2.8
2.6
2.4-
Z
0
2.2
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
NOV, 8,7 DEC. 87 JAN. 88' FEB. 8,8 MAR. 88 APR. 88
~ MAPLE PLAIN AVE. ~ WAYZATA ACTUAL
AIRPORT MAPLE PLAIN WAYZATA
......... ACTUAL
NOV. 87 I,
DEC, 87 0, 87 I, ~ O. 86 0.79
OAN. 88 0, 82 ~..~;' :' 0, 84 O. 96
FEB.,. 88 0,85 0,3 0,78 0.'19
MAR. 88 1.17 1,~ 1.52 1.51
A:'R.,,. 88 ~ ~-:~ ' 58 2,35
i. O, 95
RESOLUTION 88-
RESOLUTION CORRECTING RESOLUTION 88-35 RECONVEYING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT
LANDS BACK TO THE STATE AND REQUESTING THE OOUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON
THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF
ADJOINING LANDS.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the legal description used in
Resolution 88-35 did not adequately describe said property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the following legal description be substituted for the legal
description used in Resolution 88-35:
PID #24-117-24- 44 0055 - That part of Lot 24, 8lock 5, Arden, according to
the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of a line 30.00 feet northerly
of and parallel with the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 24, Township 117, Range
24; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the south line of the
Southeast quarter of said Section 24 a distance of 270.86 feet to the
point of beginning; thence East 100.00 feet; thence northeasterly
185.00 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having
a radius of 286.48 feet and a central angle of 37 degrees, and there
terminating.
RESOLUTION 88-
RESOLUTION CORRECTING RESOLUTION 88-35 RECONVEYING CB-~TAIN TAX FORFEIT
LANDS BACK TO THE STATE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON
THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF
AD3OINING LANDS.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the legal description used in
Resolution 88-35 did not adequately describe said property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the following legal description be substituted for the legal
description used in Resolution 88-35:
PID #24-117-24- 44 0055 - That part of Lot 24, Block 5, Arden, according to
the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of a line 30.00 feet northerly
of and parallel with the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 24, Township 117, Range
24; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the south line of the
Southeast Quarter of said Section 24 a distance of 270.86 feet to the
point of beginning; thence East 100.00 feet; thence northeasterly
185.00 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having
a radius of 286.48 feet and a central angle of 37 degrees, and there
terminating.
RESOLUTION 88-
RESOLUTION CORRECTING RESOLUTION 88-35 RECONVEYING CE3RTAIN TAX FORFEIT
LANDS BACK TO THE STATE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON
THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF
AD3OINING LANDS.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the legal description used in
Resolution 88-35 did not adequately describe said property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the following legal description be substituted for the legal
description used in Resolution 88-35:
PID #24-117-24- 44 0055 - That part of Lot 24, Block 5, Arden, according to
the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of a line 30.00 feet northerly
of and parallel with the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 24, Township 117, Range
24; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the south line of the
Southeast Quarter of said Section 24 a distance of 270.86 feet to the
point of beginning; thence East 100.00 feet; thence northeasterly
185.00 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having
a radius of 286.48 feet and a central angle of 37 degrees, and there
terminating.
RESOLUTION 88-
RESOLUTION CORRECTING RESOLUTION 88-35 RECONVEYING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT
LANDS BACK TO THE STATE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY BO~tRD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON
THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF
AD3OINING LANDS.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the legal description used in
Resolution 88-35 did not adequately describe said property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the following legal description be substituted for the legal
description used in Resolution 88-35:
PID #24-117-24- 44 0055 - That part of Lot 24, 8lock 5, Arden, according to
the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of a line 30.00 feet northerly
of and parallel with the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 24, Township 117, Range
24; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the south line of the
Southeast Quarter of said Section 24 a distance of 270.86 feet to the
point of beginning; thence East 100.00 feet; thence northeasterly
185.00 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having
a radius of 286.48 feet and a central angle of 37 degrees, and there
terminating.
RESOLUTION 88-
RESOLUTION CORRECTING RESOLUTION 88-35 RECONVEYING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT
LANDS BACK TO THE STATE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON
THE SALE OF SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO OWNERS OF
AD$OINING LANDS.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the legal description used in
Resolution 88-35 did not adequately describe said property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the following legal description be substituted for the legal
description used in Resolution 88-35:
PID #24-117-24- 44 0055 - That part of Lot 24, Block 5, Arden, according to
the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of a line 30.00 feet northerly
of and parallel with the following described line:
Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 24, Township 117, Range
24; thence on an assumed bearing of West along the south line of the
Southeast Quarter of said Section 24 a distance of 270.86 feet to the
point of beginning; thence East 100.00 feet; thence northeasterly
185.00 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having
a radius of 286.48 feet and a central angle of 37 degrees, and there
terminating.
MEMO
TO:
FROM .'
DATE:
RE:
Board of Managers
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
Eugene A. Hickok and Associates
May 19, 1988
Lake Level, Flow and Precipitation Summary for April 1988
Lake levels in Lake Minnetonka have remained at approximately 928 in April as
illustrated by the attached graph and lake elevations. There has not been any
discharge from Lake Minnetonka to Minnehaha Creek since November 17, 1986.
Creek flow at the Browndale Ave. dam in Edina during April is shown below.
The 30 year average precipitation for March at the National Weather Service
station in Maple Plain is 2.35 inches. The actual precipitation recorded in
Wayzata for March was .95 inches. A summary of precipitation follows.
Maple Plain
Minneapolis-St. Paul
International Airport
Wayzata
PRECIPITATION SUMMARY
Actual
April --
April 1.58
Apri 1 O. 95
30 Year Average
2.35
2.05
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
)ril 4
)ril 6
}ril 8
)ri 1 11
}ril 13
}ri 1 15
}ril 18
)ril 20
~ril 22
}ril 25
}ri 1 27
)ril 29
MONTHLY FLOW SUMMARY
Grays Bay
(cfs)
Browndale Ave. Dam
(cfs)
7.5
7.5
10.3
4.1
4.1
2.8
3.2
2.5
1.1
4.5
8.0
4.5
§30.00
LAKE MINNETONKA
Wot. er Levels 1987--1988
NOHW(gzg.4)
- RUNOUT ELEVATION(928 ~
929.80
929.60
929.~0
z
z
o
929.20
929.00
928.80
928.60
928.40
928.20
928.00
927.80
927.60
927.40
927.20
927.00
09--Jan-87 01 -J ul--87 31 ~Aug --87 05--Jan--88 17-M ay--88
DATE
.r,,;r, Water EieYations - Lake
Date r~.,.~.. Flow Date r:.,~*~-- Flow n.,. F~ .... *~- "
~,_~,~ ............ ~. r~ow Date Elevation Fio~
09-Jan-B7 ~'...'8.~,~0. O0 06-.Ju!-87 927.48 O. O0 08-Sep-87 928,52 O.OO. 17-Feb-88 927.94 0.00
2!-~an-87 928.~ 0.¢.K~ 14-3ul-87 927.45 0,00 14-Sep-87 928.48 0.00 25-Feb-88 927.96 0.
· "...~Jan-87 928.58 0.00 16-Jul-87 927.57 0.00 18-Sep-B7 928.55 0.00 07-Mar-88 927.96 0.00
O~Feb-87 92~.40 0,00 ~_~.,~-~ ~o~ ~ 0 '"~' '~ .... ~ 928, (~,0,:) ....
.............. -~-~, 47 15-~ar-B8 ~.v., 0.00
~.~-=~-a7, _~, _ ~=,~.~5 C~.00. . a~-uu~-8, 927.71 ,,~'. ~'''..,.. 25-Sep-87 _ .... (:.i~(~ a~-,~r-~ 92~.06
26-Feb-B7 928.~4 0.00 24-3uI-87 928.62 O.(K~ 28-Sap-? 92S.42 0.(0 ~O-Mar-S8 92B.08 0.
06-Mar-87 ~. =~..:.¢=~ 0, oO ....... 27-Ju!-87 928, 75 ¢,.,-~n, 05-0ct-87 928.32 o.o(~ 04-Apr-88 928.14 0.00
15~ar-87 928.54 r.00 28-3ul-87 92B. 75 0. (~ 12-0ct-87 o~,~.:. ,,.'~ (~.. 00 06-Apr-88 928.16 0.00
26-Mmr-87 ~28.57 0.00 30-Ju!-87 928,79 0.00 '~ ~ + ~'
~-~c,-u/ 928.16 0.00 Il-Apr-88 928.14
(6~pr-B7 9~.28 0.00 5!-~ul-87 928.81 0.00 20-0ct-87 928.!5 0.00 1~r-88 928.16 0,00
,~',- ' ~ ~ ,~ 0.00 18-Apr-88 928.20 O.
~.;,-Mwr-81 ~8.2~' O.(E~ 05-Aug-87 928.81 0.00 26-0ct-87 928. ~ ~
21-~r-87 928,20 0.00 06-Aug-87 928.78 0.00 02-Nov-87 928.06 0.00 ~pr-88 928.~ 0.
27-Apr-87 928.22 0.00 10~ug-B7 ~8.79 0.00 09-Nov-87 928.04 0.00 28-Apr-88 928.(~ 0.
04-May-87 928.22 0.{~ ti-Aug-87 928.~ 0.00 16-No~-87 928.04 0.00 05-May-88 928,00 0.00
1~ ~-,, ~7 9~8 ~5 ~.(~0 17-Aug-87 928.85 0.00 24-Nov-87 928.00 ¢~.00 06-Kmy-BB 928.00 0.00
21-May-87 927.94 0.00 tS-Aug-87 928.85 0.00 0!-Dec-87 928.10 0.00 09-~y-88 928.14 0.00
28-May-87 927.93 0.00 19-Aug-87 928.79 0.00 07-Dec-87 928.08 0.00 15-May-88 928.(~ 0.00
" ~ 17-~ay-~ 928.00 0.00
OS-Jun-87 ~7.~ 0.00 24-Aug-87 9~8.7~ 0.00 14-Dec-87 928.08 0.00
15-~un-87 927.68 0.00 2b-Aug-87 ~28.65 0.00 05-~an-88 927.86 0.00 19-May-88 927.96 0.00
25-Jun-87 ~7.67 0.00 51-Aug-87 928.65 0.00 19-~an-88- 927.88 0.~
01-Jul-87 ~27.55 0.00 01-Sep-87 928.64 0.(0 05-Feb-88 927.~6 0.00
0.~ ~eet.
*NOTE: The zero elevation for the lake gauge was adjusted down ~
Th:s adjustment was effective January 1,1988.
SIX MONTH
PRECIPITATION
RECORDED
w
I
Z
v
Z
0
3
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4-
0.2
0
NOV. 87- DEC. 87 JAN. 88 FEB. 88 MAR. 88 APR. 88
MAPLE PLAIN AVE. ~ WAYZATA ACTUAL
SIX ~.~T~ ~c¢,=,~r~,-,~n~.~ RECORDED
AIRPORT,?~c.: ~.. AIRPORT MAPLE PLAIN WAYZATA
A~RAGE ~"*~..,. ~,-,,*~. :?'' AVERAGE ACTUAL
N,~, 87 I.~ ~ r7 ' 48 2.~
DEC, 87 0, B7 I. 25 O. 86 O, 79
JAN. 88 0,82 1.57 v. 8~. 0.96
F~. 88 O, B5 O. 3 O, 78 O, 19
MAR. 88 1.17 1.c~ ~.,~,~ 1.51
APR. 88 2. ~ I. 58 2.55 0.95
RESOLUTION 88 -
WHEREAS~ the Mound City council has resolved to proceed with the
improvement of Shoreline Boulevard (County Road 15) by the addition of street
lights from Fairview Lane to the Seton Bridge.
AND WHEREAS, the council previously resolved to improve Shoreline Boulevard
by the addition of street light from Commerce Boulevard to Fairview Lane.
AND WHEREAS, upon receiving bid prices from Hennepin County, it has been
determined that the total cost of both projects has been estimated to be
$179,600.00.
AND WHEREAS, it has been determined that the amount of the pending
assessments, as approved in resolution 87-113, should be reduced to conform
with the most recent estimates.
NOW THEREFORE, Be It Resolved by The City Council of Mound, Minnesota:
1. The estimated cost of the initial street light project from Commerce
/--.. Boulevard to Fairview Lane be reduced from $127,353.00 to $110,140.00.
. The amount of pending assessment be reduced~Er~m~$14.-~8/L~~¢---~-,
$13.50/L.F. for commercial property and f~m $9.72/L.F. to $9.00/L.FJ
for residential property. ~~
Adopted by the council this 24th day of May, 1988.
Please complete and return as soon as poss;bte. Thanks.
Ci'TY OF I-iOUND
NOJ ~.ID, H1NN 'ESOTA
MAINTENANCE PER{YfT
For
ContinuinD the Present Use. of a Structure
-Z.u' :
' '_
or Improvement on Public Lands or Commons
Do you h~ve Pn improvement or structure on Public L~nds or Com~,nons?. /~ i~'
If yes, list them:
.'t'la.s a permi.% issued to authorize the construction of this improvement or struc-
tbre? I.J/ /i.--. If yes, month and yea~:
~.~ 'rr'g.:,~m IfJST FURNISH THE FOLLOWING:
1. Copy of p~rmit issued to authorize construction.
2. One plot plan drawn to scale' showin9 dimensions of the structure/
improvement _and location of same.
o
One set of plans and specifications of suf£icient clarity and datail to
indicate the nature and extent of the structure or improvem8nh.' Show
£oundation'plan~ floor ptan~ front and side elevation~ wall and roof
section detail.
Photographs of existin~ structure/ improvement,
P/~.K CO:,P,IiSSIOT~ RECOPF-%NDATIO-~:
DATE 5-12-88
Recommend granting approval of'a maintenance permit for the stairway.
CCU>!C'~_ ACTIO'.:]:
RES G~_iITtON HO.
DATE 5-24-88
F%LLO:'3-U P AC'FIO>J:
MINUTES OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION MEETING
May 12, 1988
Present were: Chair Nancy Clough; Commissioners Cathy Bailey,
Stephen Burke who arrived at 8:]0 p.m., Marilyn Byrnes, and Linda
Panetta; Council Representative Phyllis Jessen; Park Director Jim
Fackler; and Secretary Marge Stutsman. Absent and excused was
Commissioner Shirley Andersen.
Also present were the following interested persons:
Dahlen and Edwin Friedlund.
William
MINUTES
The minutes of the Park Commission meeting of April 14, 1988 were
presented for consideration. Bailey moved and Byrnes seconded a
motion to approve the minutes of the Apri 1 14, 1988 Park
Commission meeting as published. The vote was unanimously in
favor.
Request from William Dahlen, 4555 Island View Drive, to construct
a stairway on Commons
Mr. Dahlen stated his plans for stairway are similar to the
stairs that exist on the adjacent property. There will be
roughly 14 steps of pressure treated pine down to dock with a
walkway (4 - 2 X lO's which will connect dock to shoreline). He
plans to put in 4 X 4 posts 48 inches down to below frost line of
pressure treated pine; steps wil~ be 40 inches wide of 2 X 12's
reinforced with 2 X 4's and will De built by a local carpenter
The Park Director, Jim Fackler, explained that he looked at this
Commons and it is Class C - non transversable; they need a
stairway because of the topography/steepness of the hill. Jim
stated any stairs with more than 3 risers needs a handrail and
stairs would have to have a permit and the Building Inspector
would inspect them.
The Commission discussed whether others would be able to use this
stairway; they thought probably because of the terrain and
location, no one else would; but the applicant needs a stairway
if they are going to use the lake.
Bailey moved and Byrnes seconded a motion to recommend granting
approval of a maintenance permit For the stairway, The vote
was unanimously in favor.
0
b3: --- o
.J
Hay 18, 1988
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) ,t72-1155
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
MICHAEL J. MALASKE, 6557 BARTLETT BOULEVARD
Attached you will find a letter dated May 6, 1988 from Mayor
Steve Smith to myself regarding questions on a lift station
located on private property at 6557 bartlett Blvd.
Mr. Malaske had contacted Jori Elam, City Manager, in February
1985, regarding repair to the lift station on his property. Mr.
Elam told him that the City of Mound had provided the lift
station years ago and the lift station itself was installed by.a
private contractor and it was up to the private homeowner to
maintain the station. In 1986, Mr. Malaske contacted me
regarding the same issue. I responded in the same way that Mr.
Elam had done, by letter dated August 7, 1986. Both Mr. Elam's
and my letter are attached.
I have verified the City's role in this issue by contacting
Leonard Kopp, City Manager between 1960-1981. Leonard indicated
that the City of Mound provided the pumps and/or stations as
early as 1966, but told the homeowners that they were responsible
for their installation and ongoing maintenance. The City of
Mound, as far as our records indicate, has never paid for any
repairs to these private lift stations.
For your information, the City of Mound has 29 lif{ stations,
which are City owned and operated. The City has permanent
easements on private property for these stations. The 10 private
stations are not included within the 29.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
~-Edward ~l.[ Shukle, Jr. ~
--"~ City ~anager
cc: Mr. Malaske
Ar, eoua: OpPOrtun ty Emp;c.,/er that does not discrcr,;r;ate on the basis cf race, color, r, at~ona; orig,n, or handica2ped status
in the admission or access to, or treatment or em, plc,/ment ~n, its programs and actiwt~es
Joel
Dc, aglos F. McGuire
Joel C. Monke
Steven C. Smith
SMITH · FISHER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
May 6, 1988
Market Plaza
732 West 66th Street
Richfield, Minnesota 55423
[612) 8614556
Mr. Ed Schukle
City Manager
Mound City Hall
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re:
Michael J. Malaske
6557 Bartlett Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
472-4776
Dear Ed:
Mr. Malske has contacted me with several questions, and I would ask
that you refer these, perhaps, to Jan Bertrand and, if she would be
so kind as to report back by the council meeting scheduled for
May 24, 1988'. I will be happy to notify Mr. Malske that he can
appear at that time if he has further questions. I think the
questions that he has raised concerning his particular situation may
have impact or be of interest relative to anyone's similar
situation. Thank you for your help.
Mr. Malske's home at 6557 Bartlett Boulevard is situated below the
City's sewer line. Therefore, he needs and has a sump pump or a
lift station located on his property. A couple of years ago the
pump went out and he was required to replace it at his own expense.
He was under the impression that it was a City expense.
1. How many such pumps or lift stations exist in the C~.ty
of Mound?
After searching the records or within Jan's memory in
the recent past, ten years or so, has Mound ever paid
for the repair of or repaired directly any such pumps
or stations?
Sincerely,
Steve Smith
Mayor of Mound
SCS:nn
cc: Michael J. Malaske
August 7, 1986
CITY of
MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
Mr. Mike Malaske
6557 Bartlett Blvd.
Mound, MN. 55364
Dear Mr. Malaske:
This will confirm my conversation with Mr. Connolly today that all
repairs on private sewer lines are the responsibility of the homeowner.
~~.~~nce~y ~~~~
Ed~"a~~']/' / d J ' ~k]e, Jr. .1 Sh
City Mana!er
EJS:fc
An equatopportumty Employer that does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or hand~casped status
in the admission ;- ' access to. or treatment or emo!ovmen~ m. its Droqrams and
February 20, 1985
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND1 MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
Mr. Mike Malaske
6557 Bartlett Blvd.
Mound, MN. 55364
Dear Mr. Malaske:
This will confirm my conversation of yesterday that all repairs
private sewer lines are the responsibility of the ~homeowner.
Si ncerely,
on
Jori Elam
City Manager
JE:fc
CITY
of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
(612) 472-1155
T~: Ed Shukle,City Manager
FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official 9~
SUBJECT: Statu~ report of outstanding compliance orders for
various restaurants
DATE: May 19, 1988
Since the City Council meeting of April 26, 1988, I have sent notices
to the owners of the restaurants which have outstanding items to be
completed from the building construction projects and grease obstruction
of the city watermain. I have attached this various notices for your
convenience.
The status of the items to be completed as of mx' inspection on Ma5, 16th
is'as foilows:
2544 Commerce Boulevard, the site work is not completed and the V.F.W.
has not given me a date fdrtheir intention to complete.
5550 Three Points Boulevard, the permit has been obtained by Westonka
Sewer and Water to complete the installation of the grease interceptor.
2244A Commerce Boulevard, the outstanding code item(s) have been completed.
5557 Shoreline Boulevard, all items listed on the Temporary Certificate
of Occupancy are complete with the exception of the water closet
clearance of 24 inches in front of it. I discussed the completion with
Bill Alexander; he stated that the plumbing contractor could do the
work the week of the 23rd. After discussion with Aaron's Plumbing,
Larry Olson, he stated that he has not been contracted to complete the
necessary moxring of the water closet to provide the proper clearance.
Ar, equ, ai opportunity Emplofer that does not d~scrimir, a~e on the basis of race. color, nat;otc! or,gm, or handicapped status
*n *,'he admission or access to, or treatment or emD!oymen~ in. its programs and activities.
April 27, 1988
CITY of MOUND
534~ MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. M~NNESOTA 5536"
16!2) 472-'1155
Taco Deli Restaurant
5557 Shoreline Boulevard
Mound, Mn, 55364
Dear Sir:
At the Council Meeting of April 26, 1988, the City Council
reviewed the outstanding item(s) to be completed as discussed by
the Building Inspection Department over the previous month(s).
Attached is a copy of my previous correspondence and discussion
which was approved at the time of the permit issuance including
site improvements listed on the Temporary Certicate:
Item not done is the relocation of the restroom water closet.
The City Council wilt aga'in review the status of your project at
their May 24th meeting. The City Council, at that time, may
direct staff to proceed with legal action if you have not
completed the above listed item.
Yours very truly,
.Jan Bertrand
B'uilding Official
dB/ms
Encl.
cc: City Manager
Gayle Burns
T mporary. Certificate of' Occupancy
JTY of MOUND
ILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE NOTED AS INCOMPLETE OR MI~ING. THESE MUST BE coRREcT~D "
0R COMPLETED AND REINSPECTED WITHIN ~ 0 DAYS OR THIS CERTIFICATE WILL BE VOID.'"
FAILURE TO CORRECT THESE DEFICIENCIES WILL C~USE OCCU~ANC~ VIO~TION CITATIONS'TO
I HEREBY AGREE TO MAKE THE ABOVE CORRECTIONS AND TO CALL FOR REINSPECTION WITHIN
THE TIME ALLOWED:
START BILLING FOR:
· Y CITY WATER
V . CITY SEWER
BUILDI'NG-O'F FICIAL
April 27, 1988
CITY ()f ,NIOUXD
Happy Garden Restaurant
5550 Three Points Boulevard
Mound, Mn, 55364
Dear Sir:
At the Council Meeting of April 26, 1988, the City Council
reviewed the outstanding item to be completed as discussed by the
Building Inspection Department over the previous month(s).
Attached is a copy of my previous correspondence and discussion
which was approved at the time of the permit issuance including
site improvements listed on the Temporary Certicate:
Item not done
-interceptor.
is the installation of the sewer grease
The City Council will again review the status of your project at
their May 24th meeting. The City Council, at that time, may
direct staff to proceed with legal action if you have not
completed the above listed item.
Yours very truly,
Jan Bertrand
Building Official
JB/ms
Encl.
cc: City Manager
Gay. le Burns
I
75 YEARS
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 553r::~ (612) 472-1155
June 5, 1987
Happy Garden Restaurant
SS~O Three Points Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Sir:
I discussed the problem of grease build-up in the public sewer system with
Greg Sk nner after which I personally inspected the Happy Garden Restaurant.
Judging from'the grease accumulation on top and inside of .the floor drains,
as well as other.areas, I find that a grease trap'or grease interceptor'must
be installed to prevent future (serious) plugging of the public sewer system.
After viewing the'site-(HaPPY Garden Restaurant), ] find two options available
to the restaurant. The first would be a grease trap insta~led on the main
· sewer 1.ina within the building, inside the mechanical room. The second option
would be 'a grease interceptor instalied .outside the building. This would.
involYe re-routing of the main sewer line outside to the interceptor, then
back to the original sewer line inside the building.
I feel the.second option would be the.better of the two, s~nce the grease
~trap requires .constant maintenance, cleaning, and poses a potential health
hazard, i.e., bugs, germs, etc. A c~eaning and maintenance contract for the
grease interceptor must be suppl'ied to the Inspection .Department to ensure
cleaning on a regular basis as well es an accessible location.
A plumbing permit must be obtained within 15 days with work completed by
Au.cust 1, 1987 according to Minnesota Health Department Plumbing Code
~'MHD ~26(3)(aa)(aa'~).
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me during
evenings or w~ekends.
Yours
Jim Thompson
Plumbing Inspector
JT/pb
87/86
cc:" 'Gr.eg Skinner, Public Works /~ 7~
'..'ROger Carlson, Environmental Health Dep~t~.~ ~.~.._~ 0~--~~ [
April 27, 1988
CITY ()f XlOUND
V.F.W. Club # 5113
2544 Commerce Boulevard
Mound, Mn. 55364
Gentlemen:
At the Coumci 1 Meeting o~ April 26, 1988, the City Counci 1
reviewed the outstanding item(s) to be completed as discussed Dy
the Building Inspection Department over the previous month(s).
Attached is @ copy o6 my previous correspondence and discussion
which was approved at the time of the permit issuance including
site improvements listed on the Temporary Certicate:
Item not done is the installation oF the concrete pad and the
.screening for the dumpster enclosure as per attached site plan.
The City Council will again review the status o¢ your project at
their May 24th meeting. The City Counci ) , at that time, may
direct staff to proceed with legal action iF you have not
comp]eted the above ]isted item.
Yours very truly,
Jan Bertrand
Building Ot=t=icial
dB/ms
Encl.
cc: City Manager
GayJe Burns
I~I'LDII~G & ZONING DEPARTMENT..· ;':' '..' :" '
SITE ADDRESS 25h4'Commerce Blvd;..'
MAILING/. 'DRESS
BUILDER Ro~;a ] Homes
BUILDING PERMIT.:
NO. 86-7z;$7' DATE ISSUED
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE NOTED AS INCOMPLETE OR MISSING. THESE MUST BE CORRECTr:D
OR COMPLETE, D AND REINSPECTED WITHIN 60 .DAYS OR THIS CERTIFICATE WILL BE VOID.
'FAILURE TO CORRECT ,THESE DEFICIENCIES WILL CAUSE OCCUFANCY VIOLATION CITATIONS TO BE ISSUE"".
1.' Site improvements-are" ' ' "to be ~on~leted and ~roved b~/ the City Engineer -~~- per
exhibit 'dated March 26, l~S7 with the bituminous surface of ~.he north par~in9 lot frc. a
":'2 '
The
and the' remainder to be completed by. Sepaember 1; 1987.- This ~uld also include the
tr~h dum~$~'r enclosure, the soill-wev ~ond as approved by the Watershed Dis~r~c~,
handicapped parking stalls shall 'have proper .signege permanensly attached to the ground
on.e minlmum of'two 12 bv 20 fooq stalls within sixty (601 days and
ane to De repa'red within sixty (60) days. The proposed new driveway entrances and
clos'no off the north ex'is%~ne dr.ivew~v entrance by September 1.
County.'Nea'lth Department corrections of eoui~nt in the bar location shall be com-
... . · ),
" . : .... -.. ...f ' :.-.' ' . '~" /', .... , ~' .... 7- ~ .
·., .'.: . . ' .. ,. .. . .. · . ../,,....', ~ .-~,.'.') ~ .., . '.-
- . .~ / ~' '..: .. :' ~ Y . ,' '
~ . -~ .,. ..::..
HEREBY AGREE.TO MAKE THE ABOVE CORRECTIONS A&~D' TO CALL-NOR REINSPECTION WITHIN
. .~ ~.;, / .....
"
THET ME ALLOWED:
.OWNER/CORTRACTOR
START BILLING FOR:
× CITY WATER
X . CITY SEWER
rand
BUILDING OFFICIAL
SITE PLAN FOR
MOUND V.F.W. POST 5113
IN AUDITORS'S SUDDIVZSZON NUP, BER 167
ItENNEPIN COUNTY. H]NNESOTA
I-'
m
66'
Date : 3-17-87 "IZ,~U. ~-~-~
Datum: ~ound City sewer
~: [xisLtng spot elevaLlon
~: Proposed spot elevation
--~-: Drainage arro~
d~ote: Utilit~ and spot eleYaLlon
Information supplied by others
COFF]'N & GRONBERG, INC
Engineers, Lend Suryeyor$ and Planners
Long Lake, Minneso%a
April 27, 1988
D'Vinci's Restaurant
22~4A Commerce Boulevar~
Mound, Mn. 55364
Gentlemen:
At the Council Reefing of April 26, 198B, the City Council
reviewed the outstanding item(s) to be completed as discussed by
the Building Inspection Department over the previous month(s).
Attached is a copy of my previous correspondence and discussion
which was approved at the time of the permit issuance including
site improvements listed on the Temporary Certicate:
Item 5 is not done; i.e. install door latch, plunger and stricker
.plate at corridor door.
The City Council will again review the status of your project at
their May 24th meeting. The City Council, at that time, may
direct staff to proceed with legal action if you have not
completed the above listed item.
Yours very truly,
]Jan Bertrand
Bui lding Official
JB/ms
Encl.
cc: City Manager
Gayla Burns
Temporary Oertific te of OccupancY.
CITY of MOUND DATE APPR~)VED ///Z-~',/~2'/~
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
SITE ADDRESS
MAILING ADDRE~
P.I.D. ! 'z, '-,/'/ ?- 2-'¢ ~
BUILDER .~ ! [/,,-'~'J:~,,.~-
BUILDING PERMIT: --.t-..'~..
NO.72'i~ / ' DA.r:s ISSUED/?~"~/~7.
/' /
T'HE FOLlowING' ITEMs AR~'NoTED A~ INCOMPLETE OR MISSING:, THESE .MUs'[_.BE C'~'~"~'D
OR COMPLETED AND REINSPECTED WITHIN ~; ~' DAYS OR THIS CERTIFICATE WILL BE VOID.'
-FAILURE TO CORRECTz THESE DEFICIENCIES WILL CAI~lS'E"OCCUt:ANCY VIOLATION CiTATIO.N.$ TO BE ISSUED.
I HEREBY AGREE TO MAKET.HE..AB(gVE~_CORR..ECTIONS AND TO CALL FOR REIN'SPEt
OWNER/CONTRACTOR ..z ~;' . .._--'~ - .. DATE /~ ~ ~-" '~ '~
:TION WITHIN
o
START BILLING FOR: · '"
CITY WATER
. CITY SEWER
BUILDING OFFICIAL
BILLS ...... MAY 24, 1988
Batch 8051
Batch 8052
100,823.55
79,628.22
Total Bills
180,451.77
F'AG£ 1
PURCHASE JO
CITY
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT
B0549 F'RE-F'A ID 1 ~.::0.65
/18/88 5/18/88 1 ':', q "=
BELLBOY CORF'ORATION VENDOR TOTAL 130.65
B0580 F'RE-F'AI1] ? 15.74
652.?8
5/18/88 5/18/88 1, :::68.52
BILL CLAF:F', OIL COMF'ANY VENDOR TOTAL 1::.,68..52
P, 0607 F'RE-F'AI D I, 270. C:,C:'
585.00
.., 85~ O0
.s/18/88 5/18/88 1, _.
BOB LYCI<HOLM VEIqDOR TOTAL 1855.00
C0888 F'RE-F'AII~ =,~ ....,9.00
5/18/88 5/18/88 2~25~.00
,r- I V ~"~" ·.
CITY COUNTY CF.:ZIT UNION EN1]OR TOTAL ._._5~ O0
C0920 F'F:E- F'A I 1] 70.46
5/18/88 5/18/88 70.46
F'RE-F;A I D :E',6.80
5/18/88 5/18/88 :.-'.:6.80
CITY OF MOUND VENDOF,' TOTAL 107.26
ClOO1 F'RE-F'AtD 2,514 · 54
· 5/18/'88 5/18/88 2,514.54
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE VEI"I;DOR TOTAL 2514.54
FORM: F'RTFEA:F':. FONT:DF:AFT~ CF'I=16; LF'I=6
LM=O01~ RM=220~ TM=O01~ BM=05,5~ FL:066.,-
DESCRIPTION
LIQ
dRNL-CD
REG GAS
DIESEL
JRNL-CD
CEMENT WORK
CEMENT WORK
]]ET~ 4/:-]0 'F'R
JRNL-CD
REPLEN F'/C-RESERk
dRNL-CD
REF'LEN P/C r,_,-lC~
J
SIT 4/>]0 PR
JRNL-CD
/A2o/
F'ERFSKIF'=OFF
D1217 PRE-PAID ~1~.38 44.5 ~NTP~4]i ~dLIRS 81-4~3100
5/1,-,/~-:, .j1,:,/,:8 :-87,~ JR[~_-CD 1010
PRE-PAII) ~:6,~ 27 CDNr~qCT k~JUES 81-43:.<~-3100
5118/~S ..,/1,:,/,:-:, ~6,-"~ JRNL-CD 10t0
~79 ~=
,=,..iv LiQ
~.03' DISC
1,4.W..,5 ~BNL-CD
~T F,1JZJOLPH VENDOR TOTAL
El,.'.. F,~£-PAID
PRE-PAID
77.94 LIQ
71-7100-~10
71-7100-75>~
71-71C,~-~60
1010
71-71C,0-~510
· 71-7 ! C~-'PS_'.fI
1431.65
.{
PA~ 2
NO, IN",~DICE NM,5~ [~TE DATE STATUS
F'Fi PHILLIPS
V~[~DR TOTAL
365.
G!~O F~-PAID 15.00
5/18/8'8 5/18/~ 15.00
F~-PAtD
5/I8/~: 5/t81~
15.00
I5.~
30
1,OE~.O0
G1~71 PF~E-PAID 15.~
5/!8/~ 5/18/~ 15.~
TOTAL
G1~72 PPJE-PAID
PURCHASE JOURNA'L
~IT¥ QF MOUND
5/!8/~ 5/18/!8
F$£-PA!D
5/18/~ 5/15/~$
~E-PAID
15.35
~.,5. O?
654.28
30.~-
11.05
1,5~)0.04
78.~
103.'~
3.~-
4.05
181.77
175.00
3.?0-
3.15
174.25
1876.N
.53
DEDCF~IPTIDN
-CD
S~E)i I N~--C, FoqIE)
~JqL-CD
DEF COMP 4/30 PR
~xNI_-CD
[ED 4/3O PR
JRhL-CD
LIQ
WINE
~T
d~L-CD
MIX
WI)~.
DISC
~TC
~6:N1.-CD
WINE
DISC
~T
dF~_-CD
4/30
JEi~_-CD
1ST 1/2 RE TAI
1ST 1/2 ~'F TAI
J!F:I.~_- CD
CITY H~A~,L MA!NT
F£CYCLE ~
~-"?TER. Y M. AI~
1010
01-41~[)-4110
1010
0!-4140-4!10
I010
Oi-2040-OC. FJO
1010
01-204-0-00(~
1010
71-7100-T510
71-7100-.%573
71-7100-75,60
71-7100-9~'.9 ·
1010
71-7100-%40
71-7100-~£Q
71-7t00-9600
1010
71-7100-~
7!-7100-i56~3
71-7t00-9.a)0
1010
01-2'04-0-¢)3~y3
1010
01- 43~-,0-5.3 !0
!010
O1-4~O-ic.~)CK)
01-4270-13C~
· 8J-.P~O00-1300
!010
F S-F'AID
3~'8.67
15.CK)
106~.00
15.35
1500.04
181.Y7
~1.53
24~.!2
71-710C~9520
7!-7~
~-C02-01
Ih'~IgE DUE ~
h~. !hk~ICE ;~R ~TE DA~ STATUS
F~ARD SIY~R WJ~)]R TOTAL
PRE-PAID
5/18/~ 5/18/~
IDA ~I~EhFF COF:P VENT~OR TOT~
t~o~ ~ FW~-PA!D
5/18/88
I~50 P~-PA!D
5/18/~ 5/18/E8
I~A~ ~ ~ OF* ~ TOTE
~-PAID
5/18/~8 5/18/~8
F~-PAID
5/18/8~ 5/18/~
F~-PAID
5/18/88 5/I8/E8
F ,~E-PAID
P~-PAID
5/18/?~ 5/18/~
JOH}k:~ B~ ~,~LESAJ~ LI* VEkE~R TOTAL
L2817 F?~-PA I D
5/18/~ 5/18/E8
~ ~OD~ ~S~R S~* ~ TOTAL
~-PAID
5/18/~ 5/18/88
I~E ~ ~N CITIES V~.~ TOT~
~ ~-PAID
BUBCHASE JOUF:NAL
CITY OF MOL~
AY~L~,rl' [ESC~IPTI~
405.~
5~J.37 IL%A 4/~ PR
5(~.37 J~L-CD
5(~0.37
107.21 ~ING ~D
107.21 ~-CD
t07.21
~.~ ~
D~.~ J~-CD
~.80
~0.00 ~-CD
~.~ ~-CD
11~.~
1,~1.~
319.5.~ Wt)~E
5~,~- DISC
1.,. 00 FAT
743.48 dF3~q.-CD
1,405.~ LIQ
28.13-
11,00 FRT
, ~<.o, 4., ~3~L-CD
1,437.18 LIQ
643.3,6 WINE
35.43- DISC
27.50 FRT
2,072.61 JRNL-CD
,~.'04.54
[~.00 DUES 4/?~0 PR
$?.00 ¢F;NL-CD
37.00
10.00 ~C, IST~ATI~
10.00 vq::Nl_- CD
10
52,56 [~.?d 4/~ PR
01
1010
01-42'80-~'x'~
lo10
01-41~-4170
1010
01-434~}-3100
1010
01-43~-31~
1010
7t-7100-~!0
7i -7100-~2~)
71-7100-~6.4
71-7100-9600
1010
71-7100-~10
71-71(K)-?~
71-71¢~-9600
1010
71-7100-~10
7!-71(K)-'~20
71-7t00-75E~0
71-7100-9600
I0!0
01-~'~q4.0.-~00
t010
01-4090-417~
I010
01-2040-0640
500,27
107.21
1743.48
!~.45
~72.6!
~.00
I0.00
AP-C02-01
~ Itt~ICE DUE HOLD
NO, !~3ICE ~B~ ~,qTE DATE STATUS
5/18/~8 5/18/~8
)'9 C~C~CD~-lEB )¢.ALTH PLANVENDOR TOTAL
~170 P~-PA!D
5/18/~ 5/18/~
~RO W~ ~E ~l* ~ TOTAL
5/18/~ 5/18/~G
~1 ~E-PAiD
5/18/~ 5/18/~8
F~-PAID
· ~ ~~ L~ D~ VD-O~ TOTAL
F~-PAID
5/18/88 5/18/&~
~ FI~ ~_I~ A~ ~ TOT~
F~-PAID
~ ~~ ~ TOT~
~-PAID
5/18/~ 5/!8/~8
P ER A V~ TOT~
P~30 ~E-PAID
5/18/~ 5/18/E$
~YS~CI~ ~ ~ ~ TOT~
P4115 PRE-PAID
~-PAID
5/18/88 5/18/~8
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF MOUND
52,56
52,56
2,175,00
2,!75,00
2178,(10
6! ,34
47.74
109.08
109,08
4,428,~
4,42,'8.~
~, 67
66,69
1-~.~
5,280,42
5~0,42
332,26
.%'2,26
3B2,26
76.78
76,78
76.78
1,!775.47
24.80
~SCRIPTION
dP. NL-CD
~R SAC
JF~_-CD
~R DqS
~R GAS
dRNL-CD
DEF CO~ 4/~ PR
1~£S 4/D3 PR
MAY FI,~ RELI~
JE,~!.-CD
~OSTG-MZTER CAPr~
POSTG-~ETER CAPiaS
JRNL-CD
F~A 4/30 PR
JP~--CD
[ED 4/.30
JF~IL-CD
~ 4/~ PR
~'~.-CD
LIQ
W!~E
41.56- DISC
2,!~.71 ~I.-CD
1010
78-Z'~-(~X)
1010
D3-6~.,0-372~
!010
0!-20~0(~)
1010
01-20~-t)0r~
1010
!010
1010
01-2~
1010
01-~-~
1010
1010
71-71C~-9510
71-7100-75~
71-7100-7560
I010
PP~-PAID
2178.~
!6~.08
~,~
549,~
442~.'~
5~, 42
~.26
76.78
.]
P~ '5
A?-C02-01
IN'/OI~ F.~JE HOt,O
NO. INVOICE ~ DATE DAE STATUS
P~-PAiD
RE-?AID
5/!8/88 5/18/~
~:~_!TY WI)~E & ~!R!TS '~ TOTAL
R4~? F~E-PA!D
5/18/~ 5/15/E~
F'F~E--PA!D
5/18/~ 5/15/~
ROBOT E ~ ~ TDT~
~-PAiD
5/1B/~
STA~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TOT~
P~-PAID
5/18/~ 5/~8/~
STA~ C~IT~ ~IT ~!~ ~ TOTAL
~AiD
STA~ ~~ ~ TDT~
T4718 ~-PAID
5/t8/~I 5/18/~8
~ ~INS F~ ~ V~ TOT~
~-PAtD
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY DF MOUND
1,347.24
29.6.~
2~.$6-
1,614.~
647.50
18.50
666.00
1~8,O0
~61.19
L~9.03
~, .03
15.00
!5.00
15.O0
22,42~.00
~,42~.00
10.~
10.~
10.00
~.~
~. O0
1,~,0.~
1, ~). O0
1~0.00
25. O0
DE~IPTION
LIQ
DISC
~-CD
LIQ
WI~
DISC
~hl.-CD
70 CD~6F~ACT HDL~$
2 CO~(I'RACT HOURS
~-CD
4 ~T ~
~-CD
TAXES 4/~ PR
~-CD
~:T ~-KIVISTD
~[-CD
2 ~
~-CD
CHAM~ M~G
L'u;~MS~ MTG
~HA,~ ~TG
d~-CD
MAY REffAI~
P~-L~D - D~T FEE
~.NL-CD
71-7100-~,10
71-7100-95~J
71-7100-~ ~o56.0
iOlO
71-7!00-~J10
71-71~-952Q
71-7100-W~0
1010
01-434~)-31C,9
78-7800-3100
1010
01-4~-31O0
73-73k~X)-3100
1010
01-2xO4.0-(Yj(X)
1010
01-~4.0~
1010
73-73~?YJ-41~
1010
01-414.0-5000
10!0
01-¢14.0-;I~
01-4-040-412~)
I010
OI-4110-31CYJ
I0!0
Ol-~o~-C,,')(k~
1010
~AID
1614.~
1716.~
5~.00
~61.19 '
15.00
PAGE 6
~-C02-01
INVOIC~ DUE HOLD
NO. INVOICE I~.~:R ?4TE DAT~ STATL~
PURCHASE
CITY OF MOt~41L,
AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
)qA, R Y P~tCFERTY
VENDOR TDTA]_ ~.00
TOTAL ALL ~.~DORS 1C'~,~'3.~
JOURNA'L
PRE-PAID
PAGE 1
AP-C02~01
I~]ICE DUE
NO. II~O!~ NMBR [~ DA~ STATUS
AO(~I
A~VA~SE MACHIN~ CO
AOiO0
AIR ~ I~C
A0190
A~IED B_ACXT~ CO
AO?~O
A~?~ TS Fl_ORAL
B0520 -
5/18/~ 5/18/E8
VENEOR TOTAL
TOTAL
5/18/C~ 5/I8/88
VE~tOR TOTAL
5/!8/E8
TOTAL
85.67
~.67
20.45
9.45
4.68
24.30
4.69
14.85
9.45
14.85
t71.00
171.00
245.00
245.00
~.J.O0
26.50
26.~
26.50
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF MOb~
DESC~IPTICkN
~PAtR P. OOR CL~NE~:
dR~-CD
MAY ~NTRACT
KAY CON"TRACT
MAY CON~CT
~AY
MAY CO,~FFRACT
MAY COSTRACT
M~Y CONrFP~CT
FAY CONTraCT
MAY CON"FP~CT
~--CD
B_AD,50P
~E LEA~
dR~-CO..
ACCOU~ ~
-' '-4170- '-'DO
1010
PRE-PAID
AMOUNT
01-4,,~-5~0-$.."750
O1-43.4.0-$'9, 50
01-4 I~-3~y50
01- 4~-~-$'750
O1-4140--0.'5~m '.~
01-4040-~'50
7a-7?,CO-a, 50
78-78~0- ,37~0
I010
Ol - 4~ .--"80- ~,.~-0
1010
01-4I~-~--~"00
1010
~0540
BAT~ C~PA.~Y
BOS-.~SO
B~O
5/18/88 5/18/~
VENDOR TOTAL
5/18/83 5/18/8~
VDEOR TOTAL
BL~.',~WIAK AND S~N
BO~.~J)
BDW~ D!STRiBUTt[~4
....... /!o/c.c,
VE)4~ TOTAL
5/18/$S 5/18/88
VENEOR TOTAL
7.50
7.50
12.50
27.50
27.50
114.64
114.64
114.64
~.50
45.~
110.~
110.~
3,46.15
3,46.15
DXY~.N
OXYGEN
DXYGF_N
FILM-VIDEOS
JRNt.-CD
APR GARBAGE
APR GARB~SE
APR GARBAGE
~NL-CD
78-7800-2~fYJ
0!
1010
01-414C'-21C(~
1010
~-4i70-375~,
71-7100-3~4~
0t-4290-375~
lOlO
01-4L~-~10
101o
PACE. 2
AP-C02-OI
~,¥v.~.r. ~R DATE, DATE STATUS
CO~;O
C~ REGISTER SA~S
5/18/~ 5/18/S8
~8~DOR TOTAL
PURCHASE
CITY DF MOL~4D
AMOUNT [ESCR!PTiDN
64.00 ~A!R ~GtST~,
64.00
11%04 ';El SS~-,VICES
119.04 JRNL-CD
~AWHA.~%N VETEEi)~RY V%D~OR TOTAL 119.04
C0~$0 319.74 DEAN CAA~'ET
.,,~o/.,o 5/18/~:B 319.74 JEltL-CD
CH,-3%AWN CAFC'%-7 C13_AN ;%-N~ TOTAL
C0940
./lo/88 ~'~ .....
O._EAN S,T;~~ R~RTAL VB~OR TOTAL
CC960
319.74
~.24
20.24
~.~
11.97
11.49
4.~
24.90
4.44
AF'R RUG RENT
~PR RUG RS~T
dEC, L-CD
APR SL~, PLIES
AP~ S%~FL IES
APR SU~m PLIES
APR SUP~IES
AF'R SUFTilES
JOURNAL
71-71~-~<20
10!0
01-4140-41C:J
I010
O1 4.20 .~ .....
I010
01-4.,%~0-4210
71-7100-4210
10!0
.~. -4170-~3
78-7800-~00
73-7300-~'¢X)
8O- 8OOO
80-'.%¢..,0-
· 01-42"80-23(. ~
HID
AMDU~
t
CSA~T TO ~OAS?
CCr?70
51t8/88
VEEDO,R T~TAL
5/1S/~8 5t18/88
CDCA C'D.A BO,'FTLIN~-~D~S'[ VD, J'DDR TOTAL
COLE PUBLICATIONS ~ENTJOR TOTAL
CO~O
5/18/~ 5/18/68
COM.~O-FO~<JI~ !NC V'D~5'~.-; TOT~
C1079
PACE 3
AP-C02-01
IN~-ul,~= DirE. HD.D
NO. iI¢¢OICE ~ £kA~ ~ STATUS
4,08 APR SUPP. Ir_S
58.~ APR ~IES
244,74 JPJ~. -C'D
2,,I.4.74
,~7,20 APR MIX
~.20 JR~-CD
99.~
1~.00 ~.S DI~CTOP, Y
1~4.(~ dR~-f_-CD
164.00
907.00 A~
~15.00 APR
~7,00 APR CDMgLr~,
1,7~.00 JD{-CD
1709.(~
62.31 MAY l~ ~E
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF
118.41
31 ~,
209,'~
146.,23
24.56
2.~2
,30..
i.41
12.~
67.37
172.8!
4.!2
1!E5.50
i8.80
18.80
18.80
18.59
18.5~
18.59
MAY TD_D:'HD~'E
MAY
MAY
)~AY TK~_~'H~E
MAY
MAY TEi~Pl~ONE
~Y TP_E-M~OA
~-~,~. tFF:~ LINE
MAY Tm__E-F'~S-PA ID
~:hL-CD
APR C~Pi~R MAI[fT
JR~.-CD
OLqSI[£ READER
d~.-CD
01-4340-~x~0'~
0!-4~0-~
1010
71-71o0-~54-0
1010
01-41~-21C~J
10!0
0i-40S5-50(Ki
0t-4075-2100
1010
78-7800-~<j
7!-71Cm.-~0
01-4320-~,~'0
01-~-
01-41~0-~:~
73-7~-~
01-~-~
0!-!1~0~
~-4170-~J
~-4170-3~
0!-1190-~
1010
!010
73-7300-2300
10t0
PFE-PAID
DIX~ E~AVING ~OR TOTAL
F1670
F~D TANX & PA!NTI~ V~E]fL1C~R TOTAL
Fl711
F'P, AND:S TEt~X,I NG
G1747
$/!$/G~ 5/18/~8
~-rE~E)DR TOTAL
GAB Bb~I~SS ~VI~S
G1751
G L CO~fTF~e~TING
GI~O
VENEER TOTAL
5/18/88
~ TOTAL
12.~
5,800.00
5,800.00
176.40
176.40
176,40
64.12
~4.I2
64.12
916.30
716.30
~16.30
24.~
7.11
73-7~. -~00
1010
7!-7100-9600
1010
73-73CK)-~10
1010
1010
01'4140-4100
01-4090-2200
01-42'80-~r~90
PA~ 4
AP-C02-O1
I N",'Ot CE DUE .HOLD
NO. INVOICE N,'IBR DATE DATE, STAI'dS
PURCHASE
CITY OF
AMOUN'r DESCRIPTtD~
JOURNAL
P~-PAID
AMOUNT
-)
l
511SI~ 511815'8
HEO-'.SEL MACH!~E DqOP VD~ TOTAL
H21~)
5118/~
~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~I~-PT ~ TOTAL
5/18/~ 5118/~
5/I8/~ 5/18/~t
HL'NrN CO PUBLIC ~CDg,.~'S VqDEIDR, TOIAL
HYDRAULIC CDMPD,~$' S'BWIC VENDOR TDTAL
~440
5/18/~ 5118188
J B DISTRIBUTING VD~JOR TOTAL
5/!8/88 5i15/E8
dNC~ BEBTR, AND Vb--'N[C~ TOTAL
.J?~30
5/18/88
JJ PR, IN~ING VD~DOR TOTAL
5/~8/~ 5/18/~
dOH,,q P~"RY FOSTER . ',~-~ TOTAL
2.!11
2.?2
71.97
71 .?7
146.~
1~.50
146.~
185.00
1~.~
1~.00
11.70
11.70
11.70
17.50
46.00
63.50
1~.00
1~.00
115.73
115,73
!15.73
37.79
37.7?
37.79
138.00
6.00
144,00
144.00
16.64
16.64
16.64
1010
O1
1010
01-4140-4110
I010
01-~<:-S210
I010
28-6000-3100
01-4~0-3!00
1010
Ol-4~qBO-ZSIO
I010
01-4290-c~'~,X)
I010
01-41~-4120
1010
0!-204-0-0000
0I-,5140-3500
1010
78-7800-~50
1010
..)
PAr~E 5
~-C02-01
VENDOR
NO, IN'~DICE ~
3L~ HYLAND
L2770
I h',q31 r,,E DbE HOLD
5118/.~ 5/18/&~
~ TOTAL
5/18/~ 5/18/88.
VE)~qOR TOTAL
5/18/~ 5/18/~8
~qE)~'~3R TDTAJ,
5/18/~: 5/15/88
~ MTK~q CONSEE~,~ATID~ Die VD~DOR TOTAL
L2850
5/18/~ 5/18/~
LEAGLE OF MN CITIES I~ Tm ~ TOTAL
L~O
LED~q~D HAF~
5/18/~ 5/18/~8
~FjR TOTAL
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF MOUND
A~OUNT DESCRIPTION
610.20 ~NL-CD
610.20
!5.24 AUCTIO~ EXP
i5.24 J~.-cD
15.24
7.48 MIbEA~-AUCTID~
7.48 ~.-CD
3,459.67 2~ I~TAULM7 b~CD I~,ES
3,459.67 dP, NL- CD
3459.67
616.60 ~(D QT~-IN"SUR~iNCE
68.52 ,2NDQTR-I~_~CE
616.60 .2J~D QTR-I~CE
91.34 2NI)QTR-IN~URANCE
3,528~,,.21 2ND Q~-INS"dP~E]E
34.27 ~4D Q~-INSUPY~CE
616.~ ~D
3,585.44 2ND Qi'R-INSLE~AJ~QE
342.5~ 2ND Q~-INSURA~CE
137.04 2ND QTR-INSLFr~q[~E
913.41 ~D QTR-INSURANC1E
3,471.31 ~ Q~-IN~SURANCE
2,~4.94 ~ Qll~-I~AN~'
2,534.94 ~;D Q~-!~URANCE
39.00 F~'AtR MI~'~"OWA~
~.(~ ~-CD
39.00
3.10 WH~__SPIN~.ER
~.~
93.~ ~L-CD
93.32
598.~
59~.25
598.~
APR PARTS
~L-CD
1010
01-4140-4100
lOlO
01-414.3-3340
lO!O
01-~20-4130
1010
01-404.0-3610
01-4070-~i0
01-4090-~10
01-4110-3610
01-4140-3610
01-4150-3510
01-4190-3610
01-4~)-~10
01-4~,0-~I0
01-4~-~10
O1-4340-3610
-~-4170-3610
71-7100-~10
73-7300-~10
78-7800-3610
1010
01-414.0-~-,00
1010
01-4~-.'0-~10
01-4340-'"310
I010
0!-42'~-2310
1010
ID
AMOUNT D
.!
~'*C02-0!
Ih~qDICE ~qJE HOL~
NO. II~'OlCE f,~E~ ~TE DATE STATUS
M~'.! NA AUTO
M3040
MASYS CORPOR~T ION
~,060
MARTIN'S NAVARF£
30 o.
~EIOR TOTAL
5/18/~
VE~ TOTAL
~R TOTAL
5/18/~ 5/18/~
MCC~BS FRA~ RgOS -ASS~CI* ~DOR TOlE
~0
~N PLAYC.~_ JN~
5/18/88 5/18/S~
V"'~E~..~ TOTAL
5/18/~ 5/18/~
YENDO~ TOTE
53,5!
243,86
243,86
1~,00
5,968,00
~,00
172.00
54,00
84.00
2,2~0.00
~4.00
11~.00
2,~4,00
418.00
11,8~,00
131
13.06
43,70
272.62
272.62
245.50
245.50
245.50
1,2.=~.00
1,~0.00
2,500.00
85.00
85.00
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CI~ DF MDOND
DESCRIPTION
~ SUPPLIES
,.~-CD
JUhE Sb~'PD~'T
SQUAD PROM M'JD
dRNL-CD
MAR-APR PW
A~R B¢_~ 78
~R E)~ ~.ALCOAT
~R ~-~,M SQ E~R~
A~R ~-M~ E~
~R ~R-~ 15
'APR ~-~ 15
~ ~-FI~ STA ~DtTIDN
A~IL ~I~I~
APR ~-ST~
~-CD
APR GAS
APR GAS
APR GAS
APR GAS
JRNL-CD
T~IS bETS
dF~I.-CD
BO)Q ~ P~qTtNG
BO)~ ~ RATING
~-CD
~CK F~IG & A/C
o~:NL-CD
2~-4170-~*)
1010
O1
10.10
01-41~-424~q
1010
~-6000-3100
26-5700-3100
27-5.900-3100
0 I-2~:00-0%'8
O1-2~X)-Og&5
E~-6C,~3-~ 3100
73-7300-3100
__.-4170-31.00
01-4190-31C, tl
01-4!~31(X)
1010
~-4170-3720
60-6~)CYJ-3720
01'4~0-~2~
71-71C~-332~
1010
01-4340-Z3C~
1010
~-60C~q-31 C,O
66-~7J0-3100
!010
71-7100-3.,%20
1010
P~,E 7
~'-C02-0!
V~'DOR INVOICE [LIE HDLI)
NO. II,~'OI~ I~BR ~TE D~TE ST~TUS
NAVA~ ~kPC~W~£
~7~
NEW,~A~ SIG~S
V~NDOR TOT~
5/18/$'8 5/18/E8
~ TOTAJ.
5/18/~ 5/18/~
VEN~DR TOTAL
5/18/~8 5/18/88
~ll~ERN STATES P~ ~ VENDOR ~TAL
5/18/~ 5/18/F~B
0 J JA~4E~(I & ~IATES VqEND[~ TOTAL
P4031
PHTSICiA~4S ~ ~
5/18/~
TOTAL
5/18/,-~ 5/!8/68
R~S ~ATI~;q~_. ~'DN D* V~XF~R TOT~
R4248
5/18/~ 5/18/,°,8
ROAD ,~b~dlN~Y & ~d~?LIES VENDOR TOTAL
R4270
5/18/88 5/18/88
EfJ~ ~TI:.CM V~EN~ TOTAL
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY DF, rE)Ut'ID -
AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
7.~ RIBBONS
7.99 ~NL-CD
1~.20 SI~4S
1~.20 ,JR,-CD
1~.20
1~,~2 APR, ELECTRICITY
51,64 ~R ELECTRICITY
3~rL36 A~R ELECTRICITY
2~.78 ~R ELECTRICITY
185.~4 APR ELECTRICITY
1,~05.04 ~R ELECTRICITY
1,6~.~0 AF'R ELECTRICITY
82,~ APR 'B~.ECTRICITY
4,E56.63 MAY ELECTRICITY
48.12 MAY ELECTRICITY
'),~1.23 JRNL-CD
· 300.00 APF'RAISE 544.°, LYNI43DD
300.00 JRNL-CD
114,00 6-7-$ FU3SP-~TS
76,00 7-8 HOSP i'HA~ALS
117,00 ~ ~-I'HAJ~qLS
~7.00 ~.-CD
307,00
80,00 FRT
80,00 d~34L-CD
80.00
11.46
11.46
11.~
MOT~ FOR,
JRNL-CD
E)fF CLASS E~(P
~r-o~L-CD
ACCOUNT
01-4040-21(K)
1010
01-4280-3710
01-4~%~0-3710
01-4~-3710
71-7100-3710
22-4170-3710
73-724"0-3710
78-7,%X)-3710
2~-~.~0-3710
01-4_~'6--------------q)-3710
40-6000-2710
1010
OI-4~B?-41(X)
1010
71-7!00-1510
01-4140-1510
0!-414C~15!0
1010
71-7100-~6¢~
10!0
01-4~-~10
i010
01-4140-4!I0
1010
F'F'~.
,ID
~It~fT C~
-)
PA~ 8
AP-C02-O1
~. INVOI~ )~%'R DATE DATE STAltJS
SH~..rl INE PLAZA
S4415
-EATER
S4-4-40
TOTAL
5118188
~,qE)KO~ TOTAL
5/1B/~
~I~ PK~-,I( ~ ~H tqg, L~3R TOTAL
S4.47!
ST PAUL CHAPT-A~_~, F'~ ri:u3 VE)Si)OR TOTAL
SUP~,A~MSR t C,A
S~5.,iO
SLF~ CYCLE
T4730
5/18/~. 5/18/~
U'&NI~ TOTAL
5/18/88 5/18/~
V'~DOR TOTAL
T~
TGI
TO~ CO,~'ANY
T,184.0
TD~ RDO<VA~
5/18/,~ 5/181~8
~qg-FJOR TOTAL
5/18188 5/18/~
k~Eht-l{}R TOTAL
~,.o~c.~ 5/181~
VE)L!~)F~ TOTAL
PURCHASE ,JOURNAL
CITY DF
~OL.~FF ~IPTI~
176.~ ~IP-~I'E]~
176.50 oT~.'NL-CD
176.50
7,00 ~R CA,~, WAF~ES
7'7.00 APR C~ WA~'ES
34.00 ,.~'J~l.- CD
5.00 ~ LUNCHEON
5.00 JRNL-CD
31.21
104.17 APR C-A. SCL!~
88.~ .~ GA._qDLI~
6.%,10 APR GAsOlINE,
879,85 JRNL-CD
879.85
1,430.00 APR RECYCLE SEr,W
1,430.C~ JFU~L-CD
1430.00
13.62 AE;SESS NDT!~ AD
34.05 PW BOND AD
32,?2 IMPRDV Bi)ID A~-CO 15
22.71 ~,ARINO-5~58 LYN~gOD
103.30 oT~-CD
103.30
52.85 ~ING ~PPLIES
52.~ dDt.-CD
52.~
182.00 INSTALL DOCX,
1~.00 JF~-CD
182.00
45.42 APR TOWD. S
16,80 A~R RUGS
114.00 ~ UN!FOr~
A~JNT NIJMB~
~-4170-~I30
1010
01-425J0-~10
0!-4144-~10
1010
01-4150-4110
1010
01-4190-~10
73-7300-.~..i0
01-4280--~10
01'414-0-~10.
10!0
01-4270-4200
I010
01-4070-3510
~-6000-~I0
60-6000-~I0
1010
I010
01-4340-3800
I010
Ol
01-4Z80-_~%0
O1 - 4~,."~K)-~4.0
AJ'iOUN"[
PAGE
AP-G02-01
NO. Ik~,q3I~ ~ [~qllE ~l'E STA~
5/18/88 5/18/88
UNITOG FUD4TAL SYSTEM '~ TOTAL
V5190
5/18/~ 5/18/88
UANDOREN-HAZARD-STALLINSS VENDOR TOTAL
W,5430
~ ~'DDUCTS C[I~t~ANT
W5560
5/18/88 5/18/,~
VENDO~ TOTAL
5/t8/88 5/18/88
VE),E~OR TOTAL ~
WESTD~CA FO0[~
WtESTD~A VAr~,~ CE~
W5630
5118188 5118188
~ TOTAL
5/18/88 5/18/88
V~ TOTAL
W!~
k5-700
5/18/88 5/18/88
VE~OR TOTAL
5/18/88 5/18/88
W~J:,'S'F - F'EAE:SON - LARSL'~( ~qE)E~DI~ TOTAL
5118/~ 5/18/~
5'7.00
9.72
3]0.34
310.~
1,S~20,..00
1,290.00
2,610.00
2610.00
570.00
570.00
570.00
255.18
71.86
~7.04
~7.04
2.07
41.25
~.4.0
5,6.43
1~.15
!~. 15
2iO.OO
626. O0
97.50
~.00
1,~.~
1563.50
2,648.50
2,648.50
2648.50
406.34
406.34
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY DF MOUNI~
~SO~IPTI~
APR UNIFORMS
APR UNIF[RMS
d~-CD
COMPR PLAN UP[~TE
3-4 PLAN
d~-CD
PRDT STSl SEF~ICE
Jiilt_-CD
RISERS
STUFFING
JFUtL-CD
APR SUPPLIES
APR SUPPLIES
APR SUFgLIES
&PR SL~'PLIES
JRNL-CD
CARgE'F ~-LI~ STORE
,.BhL -CD
MIU.F~
LA)~_.AND RD
DIG LA~-RIDL~D
WEST~JGE & ~qERGR
dBNL-CD
APR P,E13SECtFFI C~
Jt~l.-CD
APR ~INT-5600
d~L -CD
ACC~ NUMJ;EB,
78-78OO-~4-0
1010
16-58~,4-3100
01-4190-31~
1010
73-73O0-42OO
1010
73-7300-23OO
1010
O1-4ioO-,-'OO
~-4170-~OO
01-~-~
~-4170-7;,'~
I010
71-7100-42~X)
1010
01-4~'~-4=<)0
78 - 7EKJO-~)O
81-4350- 5~'¥J0
73-73~X)-38(xO
1010
01-4110-3120
1010
lOlO
P~E ~0
~-D02-O!
· NO. th'VOICE I~R DATE DATE STATUS
IlE~ I~
Z6063
RAYMOND
16071
'~"~ TOTAL
VENI)DR TDTAL
5/18/88 5118/88
VENDDR TOTAL
TOTAL AiL VENDORS
PURCHASE JOURNAL
CITY OF MDUND
A, MDUNT DESC~IPTIDN
99.59
.~.00 REIMB J. NE HDSP-~
145.00 REIMB MAY HOSP-MRS THARAL
22.~- REFI~-SHARE-THAP. ALS
160.05 ,i:NL-CI}
160.05
46.18 RECOP~
46.18 J~.-CD
~6.18
79,6~.22
01-4140-1510
01-41~0-1510
01-~140-I510
1010
-,~-4170-22t'.0
1010
PRE-PAID
GENERAL FUND
! ntepgover, nmer~t~l
Business Li,-ences
Iqon-Busi ness
Licenses and
Per-mi ts
Ch,~r. ges T:op
Ser. vices
C:c,u r- t Fines
Ch~r. ges t.o Other.
/le D~'tmen t s
Other. Rever~ue
TOTAL REVEI'qUE
BLtDGET
CITY OF MOUND
1988 BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
APRIL i.988
APR I L YTD
REVENUE
:3:3.3 %
PER CENT
REVENUE VARIANC:E RECEIVED
:3 :--: C, 08 26968 :36972." 'P 9/--, 0:36 :3· .~'-"'.. ,:,/,
77/:,'P50 12500 764450 1.61%
,~ 10 ._,..' 7 1668 6F:42 ! 9 · 60%
004o0.. 97:38 22'.-.-~73 77427 .~-.. ,'-"-' 8:-]%
:37200 1514 44._,6 32744 11 · 98%
9C)CK)O 55:37 11950 7:--:(2)5(i) 1 :'::. 2:=-',%
=7.- _,0 1:2:74 4.~'.~/-,_. _ 226L::4 16 . ,=,'-'.~'._ %
~/.'-}.~c~ 868 10:::7 ='=- - ~ 1 · 91%
F, 96202 . ~--'
:30298 46._ 7/_-, 20 B 40 ?/_- 4 ._ -.- X
LIQUOR FUND
WATER FUND
:_:;EWER FUND
:--:CK) 0 C)0 70:=-:26 ,:.._,._, ,=.,. -'>:, ---,.-.,.':,. '7, .=; A/-, 77.~_ - - ~ 29. 1 .'=;"._ %
::: 15000 .... "-'= -'/. '-'= -"-' ='
-.' 4.z, .z, ._ .'.' :, 1 ..' ._21 ,:, ,:, 7 ._ 30.~, -.' Y. =- '-"
5-~,(')OC)C) 4::::3::-:4 190026 ::',5'.-.?'P74 :34. F,.~,''
C:ITY OF MOUND
!'.-.-,::_:~:: BUDGET REPORT
E X PEND I T UR E'.E;
APR I L 1 ';':-- E
:3:3.2:%
BUDGET
GENERAL FI_iNF~
C: c, u n c i 1
C&b 1 e TV
City Mmnmger./Clerk
Et eot i,:,r,s
Assessing
Finmr,,:e
Compute r.
Legml
F',:, 1 i ,:e
Civil Defer, se
P1 mnr', i rig/I nspect i ,:, F, S
Recycl ir, g
?;t cee t s
· '-=; h ,:, p & ~E; t ,:, r. e s
City F'F. c, pe F't y
PmF' k s
:E;umrr~e r- Rec r'eat i,:,F,
COF, t ir, ge FiC ies
Tr'mrl s.Fe F' S
APRIL YTD PER CENT
EXF'ENSE E X F'EN'.--;E VARIANCE EX F'EN£1EFI
4/_-,:--: 10 156:_7 .~ 7t 4.:, '2?76 7 :2;/:, 41%
:--: :2:9 0 2 :':: 191 :3199 2.2 :.-]: %
11/:,760 17540 4'.-'. ':--:/_-,5 74:--,'.-?F_ :_::6.2:=-:'/.
40000 24 28:_=: 5- 9712 0.72%
41 E: O 0 ?' O 1:2::::'F' 4041 I :2:. :2:2 %
1:2:4940 '-' '" '-' =-
! :., o.: .... 4/_-,344 :-:E:5'P/--, :2:4.. 2:4%
2:-]:920 2/:, 1 '-~.. ~." '-"-"-"-'..' ~ .a ,:, t 6192 44. c:,._ 1%
9'71 = ' 1 ..' 7 ='., :31801 ::,._,.:, ~
· -'(-) '-' '- =' /' ='-'" '--' :32 · 7:3 %
/ '-'= - "' 29.
,/_-, 60410 52'.-.-' 4'F; 191 :-=: 1:2: 4 :,,:,._, '.-.. / 04 %
2000 :2,7 19/: :2 i . c,._ Z
109450 14'Pg:B '-' ,: ~'-'
· :.6 :,._,.a 72792 33.4
17:E:80 2::: 4647 132:33 ..'._'- ='
_ . --, .-,% ~ .-,~ .-,,. ,-,% .-, .
:::64270 ~:7-.'._ 1 t 1._7,~/ -.' -},=,._4.:, :'::1 77%
· _ 1 ,:,a,O 4:2:27 1/- ....... 7'-}/-, :::50/-,4 c,.:,_, ~. · 3'PY.
L--: :3 :--', :':: 0 4427 1 ~ ::: ::: F', 679 '.-.-,' 2 1 ',:: · ,S', 'r.-; %
.... ' ' - .... : .... 1%
16._, ,-4-.z, 0 :B 1412 F, 9'~' 41-, 10 ,/-, 1 :--: 4 '-' ='
766 (') 0 7660 0 · 00 Z
0 117:2,, 1 9 2 2 - i 9 2 -]
1 50'F,'$,0 'F;720 ....... .::::::=::::._¢ 1 12 i (717 25. 7._Y.
GENERAL FI_ND TOTAL
Ar. em Fire
.'=_;e r.v i ce FHF, d
C ,:, IT~IT~ ,_', r~ _:. ]-1 o ,: I.:: s F u 1] d
Limu,:,r. Fund
Nm(er- Fij F~ d
:--;ewer' Fur-~d
2214:2:(]) 2(.')742 72115 14'.-7:'-: 15 :_--:2.57%
69'.:.~'F.'0 10:3:B 54-646 15:344 78.08%
1 ',:-:7520 13'F.~ 5'F; 5:3026 13449'4 2:--:. 2:B%
2'.-.-,'.-7, 620 18510 1 (31._-=, .~:-~=._ 1. '.~:-_-: 025 :-:,, :-::, .c.., 1 %
/_-,4'F'640 4/_-,4:3:--: 2C',523:3 4444(37 :':: 1.59%
MINNEHAHA CREEK
WATERSHED DISTRICT
P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
BOARD OF MANN, ERS: Camille O. Andre, Pres. · Albert L Lehman · John E. Thomas
James R Spensley · Richard R. Miller · Robert D. Erickson · C. Woodrow Love
LAKE MINNETONK~
May 16, 1988
TO:
RE:
Interested Citizens
1987 Annual Report
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed is a copy of the Annual Report of the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for 1987. Should you have
any questions regarding the District's activities, please feel
free-to contact any member, of the Board of.Managers.
Very truly yours, ,-7
Camille D. Andre, President
Board of Managers
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
rv/27490
BOARD OF MAItAGI:B$: Camille D. Andre, I~es. · Albe~ L. Lehman · ,John E. Thomas
James K Spens~ey · I:~ichard R. Miller · Robe~ D. Erickson · C. Woodrow Love
MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1987
April, 1988
INTRODUCTION
This Annual Report of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District provides a summary of the major activities of the Board
of Managers during 1987. Any person wishing additional
information is encouraged to contact any individual manager.
THE MANAGERS AND MEETING INFORMATION
The Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District are
as follows:
Camille D. Andre
10401 Cedar Lake Road
Apartment 419
Minnetonka, MN 55343
Term Expires
March 8, 1989
Robert Erickson
2800 McKenzie Pt. Road
Wayzata, MN 55391
Term Expires
March 8, 1990
Albert L. Lehman
3604 West Sunrise Drive
Minnetonka, MN 55345
Term Expires
March 8, 1991
C. Woodrow Love
P. O. Box 524
Excelsior, MN
55331
Term Expires
March 8, 1989
Richard R. Miller 5340 HollYWood Road
Edina, MN 55436
Term Expires
March 8, 1991
James R. Spensley 5117 Chicago Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55417
Term Expires
March 8, 1990
John E. Thomas
6326 Smithtown Road
Excelsior, MN 55331
Term Expires
March 8, 1989
The present officers are:
Camille D. Andre
James R. Spensley
John E. Thomas
James R. Spensley
President
Vice President
Secretary
Acting Treasurer
During 1987, twelve regular meetings were held by the
Managers on the third Thursday of each month at 7:30 p.m. In
order to make the meetings of the Managers more accessible to all
residents of the District, the Managers meet in odd numbered
months at the St. Louis Park City Hall and in even numbered
months at the Wayzata City Hall.
The Managers exchanged information with other governmental
units affected by the programs and policies of the District and
honored requests to attend meetings of municipal, county, and
state officials as well as meetings of interested citizens. The
Managers received support and assistance from the Hennepin and
Carver County Boards of Commissioners through the year which
greatly assisted the District in carrying out its programs during
1987.
During 1987, the Managers continued to serve in
organizations dealing with water resource issues. Former Board
President Cochran served as a director of the Minnesota
Association of Watershed Districts, and participated on the Water
Resources Board's Chapter 509 Advisory Committee as well as the
Metropolitan Council's Task Force on Lake Minnetonks. The Board
participated in the activities of the Metropolitan Area section
of the Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts, and in the
deliberations of the annual state-wide meeting cf the
Association, held December 4 and 5, 1987.
The Managers supplied copies of minutes of all meetings and
reports to interested citizens and to public officials throughout
the District. Copies of the 1986 report were filed in 1987 with
the Minnesota Water Resources Board, the Department of Natural
Resources, ~he Boards of County Commissioners of Hennepin and
Carver Counties, and with State Senators and Representatives from
the area within the District.
APPOINTMENT TO THE BOARD OF MANAGERS
On July 16, 1987, the Board acknowledged that Manager
Carroll had moved to a new residence outside the current legal
boundary of the District, thereby vacating his position on'the
Board of Managers. On August 20, 1987, the Board acknowledged
that Manager Battaglia had moved to a new residence outside of
the legal boundary of the District, thereby vacating his seat on
the Board.
The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners appointed
Robert D. Erickson and C. Woodrow Love to fill these two
vacancies. Manager Erickson took the oath of office on
November 19, 1987, and Manager Love took the oath of office on
December 17, 1987.
PERMIT APPLICATIONS
The District received 235 permit applications during 1987.
In each instance, each proposed project was reviewed in detail
for compliance with the District's rules. Applications were
received for projects such as dredging, floodplain and wetland
alteration, shoreline improvements, stream and lake crossings,
-2- /eOT
preliminary plat review, and stormwater management plans for site
development. Prior to action on the applications, the District
staff spent considerable effort with city staff and/or applicants
to bring some of the proposed projects into compliance with
District rules. A summary of the permits is attached to this
report showing the project location and type of application
received.
As in previous years, a large majority of the applications
received were from the Lake Minnetonka portion of the watershed
district, reflecting the continuing urbanization of that area of.
the watershed district.
Ail permits issued by the District require compliance with
applicable municipal ordinances and, if the permit involves Lake
Minnetonka, the applicable ordinances of the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District. In addition, permits issued by the
watershed district require compliance with any applicable rules
of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The Board of
Managers also took action as necessary regarding complaints,
permit violations, and activities which had been undertaken
without a permit from the District.
HYDROLOGIC DATA COLLECTION
The District's hydrologic data collection program was
continued during 1987. The data for 1986 was published in the
Annual Hydrological Data Report on April 19, 1987. This is a
comprehensive program, which, along with data from other
agencies, has formed a long-term data bank for use in managing
the water resources of the District, particularly Lake Minnetonka
and the Minneapolis city lakes. Copies of this report were
submitted to the Minnesota Water Resources Board, the
Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the
Department of Natural Resources, the Freshwater Biological
Institute, and local government officials, citizens' groups, and
interested citizens. The 1986 data shows that precipitation for
1986 was above normal for the fifth consecutive year, and from
March to late October, there was a continuous discharge of water
at the Gray's Bay Headwater Control Structure ranging from 2-285
cubic feet per second. No major changes in water quality
occurred during 1986 in Lake Minnetonka, and stream quality in
the District also remained essentially unchanged from the prior
year.
HEADWATERS DAM AND CONTROL STRUCTURE (GRAY'S BAY) AND LAKE
MINNETONKA ELEVATIONS/MINNEHAHA CREEK FLOWS
During 1987, the District operated the Headwaters Control
Structure at Gray's Bay under the Management policy and
operational plan as reapproved by the Department of Natural
Resources in March, 1986.
-3-
Due to exceptionally low precipitation during the winter
and spring of 1987, and abnormally dry conditions throughout the
summer (with the exception of the July 23-24, 1987 storm event
discussed below), the level of Lake Minnetonka remained low and
the control structure remained closed throughout the year. Lake
Minnetonka reached a low of 927.43 on July 16, and a high
elevation of 928.79 on August 19.
Despite two severe rainfall events in July, 1987, no
discharge from the control structure occurred because of the
pre-existing lake level. Substantial flooding along the
Minnehaha Creek was nonetheless reported as a result of the
rainstorm on July 23, 1987. Manager Andre and the Engineer
attended a special meeting of south Minneapolis residents to
discuss the flooding along the Minnehaha Creek due to the July
storms.
The Headwaters Control Structure was closed for the winter
season on November 16, 1987. Due to low precipitation in the
latter portion of the summer and in the fall, the Lake Minnetonka
elevation had fallen to 928.04 on November 16, compared to the
target elevation of 928.6 established under the District's
management policy for the control structure.
· Also during 1987, the District investigated the accuracy of
the lake level recorder at Highway 10! in response to a citizen's
inquiry. After a preliminary analysis, the District staff
discovered that the lake level recorder read high by 0.22 feet,
and notified the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,
Hennepin County, and the United States Geological Survey. The
United States Geological Survey then contracted with the District
to re-establish the elevation of the Highway 101 lake level
recorder using three separate benchmarks. The DNR reported to
the District that neither the Ordinary High Water level nor the
prior fixed crest dam at the Gray's Bay Control Structure are
affected by this adjustment.
The Managers continued to rely heavily upon participation
of each of the municipalities on Minnehaha Creek in recording
creek elevations and flows and reporting that data to the
District. The District prepared monthly su~aries of this data
and made the summaries available to interested municipalities and
citizens. The assistance of each of the municipalities is
invaluable to the District in making the necessary operational
adjustments to accomplish the management objectives of the
Headwaters Control Structure.
-4-
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLANNING: CHAPTER 509
The District completed the task of developing the Chapter
509 Surface Water Management Plan in 1987. The computerized
hydrologic analysis shows that the flow from the upper watershed
entering the Minnehaha Creek through the Gray's Bay Control
Structure is not the primary cause of downstream flooding, but
rather stormwater runoff from downstream land areas. Downstream
flooding and water quality control will remain priority concerns
for the District. The District completed its draft of the 509
plan including the Capital Improvement Program. The District
held several special meetings to review the draft of the 509
plan, as well as technical advisory committee meetings with
municipal representatives. The draft 509 plan was circulated to
municipalities for review and comment on September 25, 1987. At
its December meeting, the Board of Managers elected to extend the
review and comment period for an additional thirty days while
maintaining the established schedule to complete the review
process. The District began meetings with Hennepin County to
discuss the financing of the Capital Improvement Program.
ST. LOUIS PARK REILLY TAR REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN
Manager Spensley met in late 1987 with representatives from
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,
and the City of St. Louis Park regarding the Reilly Tar Remedial
Action Plan. The Plan includes use of a gradient control well to
pump water from the aquifer. The District participated in the
discussion of alternatives of pumping the discharge from the
gradient control wells to Bass Lake, into the City of Minneapolis
chain of lakes, or into a second pump station and then into the
Minnehaha Creek. Following several meetings, the District
resolved to recommend discharge into the City of Minneapolis
chain of lakes, and will continue to participate in these
discussions during 1988.
BOUNDARY AMENDMENTS
On June 18, 1987, the District approved a petition to amend
the boundary between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and
the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District at the area east of
Dearborn Street and north of Belmore Lane in the City of Edina.
The Water Resources Board ordered this area to be included within
the legal and hydrologic boundary for the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District on September 8, 1987.
/B(o
-5-
ADOPTION OF REVISED DISTRICT POLICY CONCERNING DREDGING PERMITS
On June 18, 1987, the District Board of Managers approved a
resolution to permit dredging in limited circumstances without
prior Board approval. Following a review of the issues and
procedures concerning dredging permits, the Board authorized the
District Engineer from June 18, 1987 until October 1, 1987 to
issue dredging permits for commercial and residential properties
without prior Board approval if the application meets all
applicable criteria of the District's rules, and in addition,
meets all of the following standards:
Any required DNR permit where approval
has been issued;
o
The purpose of the dredging is to
maintain a depth of water necessary for
navigational access;
o
The volume of dredged material to be
removed does not exceed 10% of the
volume removed under the most recent DNR
or Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
dredging permit issued for the site and
the area to be dredged does not exceed
10% of the area most recently dredged
under such a permit. The Engineer may
allow dredging exceeding these
percentages where necessary for
reasonable navigational access if such
dredging represents the minimal impact
solution; and
o
Approvals granted under this resolution
shall be reported to the Board of
Managers at the next regular meeting
following the Engineer's approval.
Approvals under this resolution are to be issued only once
for a specific site.
MINNEHAHA CREEK EROSION PROTECTION
During 1987, the District shared in the cost of erosion
protection improvements along the banks of Minnehaha Creek
between Lake Nokomis and Lake Hiawatha. The District's
assistance came through the Water Maintenance and Repair Fund.
The improvements were constructed by the Minneapolis Park and
Recreation Board.
-6-
DRAINAGE PROJECT AT GLEN ROAD AND COUNTRY ROAD 19
At the request of the City of Shorewood and the Village of
Tonka Bay, the District initiated a series of meetings with the
municipalities to explore alternatives to remedy a persistent
drainage problem at the intersection of Glen Road and County Road
19. Work on this project will continue into 1988.
1988 BUDGET
As required by law, the Managers held a duly noticed publi~
hearing on September 15, 1987 concerning proposed budgets for the
District's Administrative Fund, Water Maintenance and Repair
Fund, and Survey and Data Acquisition Fund. Following the public
hearing, the Managers adopted budgets for 1988 for these funds
and certified tax levies to Hennepin and Carver Counties for
collection.
FINANCIAL RECORDS
The financial records of the District are kept by a
certified public accountant. All financial transactions are
recorded in the minutes of its meetings.
. The Treasurer of the District maintained separate records
for the following-four funds in 1987: (1) the Administrative
Fund; (2) the Management Planning Fund; (3) the Water Maintenance
and Repair Fund; and (4) the Survey and Data Acquisition Fund.
Records for each of these funds include the dates and amounts of
all expenditures, the names of individuals receiving payment, and
the purposes for which payment is made.
The official depository for the District is the Wayzata
State Bank, Wayzata, Minnesota.
During 1987, the financial records of the District were
audited for the year 1986 and a copy of the audit was filed with
the State Auditor for the State of Minnesota in April, 1987.
Respectfully submitted,
Camille D. Andre, President
Board of Managers of the Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District
25790
-7-
mm
1~87 PERMIT APPLICATIONS
UNI IPALITY TYPE OF
B C D
CHA~SEN
I)EEPHAV~
EDINA
EXCELSIOR
GOt. DEN VALLEY
8REEh~'DOD
HOfl<I~
Ih[DEPENDENCE
LAKETDWN TWP.
LDN~ LA~KE
MAP,.E RLAIN
MINNETDNl<A
M!),~EAPDLIS
~IINNETO)~Oq BEACH
Mi~ETRISTA
ORONO
PLYMOUTH
RICHFIELD
ST. BON!FACIUS
ST. LOUIS PAR)<
~OREWOOD
SPRI)~ PAPJ<
TONF~A BAY
VICTORIA
WAYZATA
6 TOTAL
5
4
22
2
4
5
10
I
1
1
6
7
15
I
1
2
1
5
'1
1
4
10
1
2
2
4
14
16
2
B
2
7
1
4
3
6
10
I1
5
5
6
27
2
4
14
21
10
2
0
12
16
4
11
4
17
5
TOTAL PERMITS 86 9 B 53
79 235
P~MIT APPLICATION CATEGORIES
B= STORMWATER MANAGE~NT PLANS
C= FLDDDPLAIN ALTERATION
D=- WETLAND ALTERATION
E= DREDGING
F= SHORELINE
G= STREAM ~tl~ LAKE CROSSING
LMC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
"Cities Helping Minnesota Grow"
PROGRAM SCHEDULE
Unbeatable Workshops, Sessions, Receptions
Ail Conference events are in the St. Paul Radisson
unless otherwise indicated
TUESDAY, JUNE 7
LMC Board of Directors
Meeting
1:30-4:00 p.m.
Special Kickoff Program
7:30-9:00 p.m.
"Good Evening, Live From the World Theater"
Featuring Noah Adams and The Good Evening Band
9:00-10:30 p.m.
#Old Fashioned Ice Cream Social"
Reception, Town Square Park, a few steps from the World Theater
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 8
Exhibits open
8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
(coffee'available in exhibit area)
Welcome/special program
8:30-9:30 a.m.
"Minnesota and Its Cities"
Keynote Address: "Reflections from the Countryside:
A Look at How Minnesota Grew"
Joseph Amato, Professor of History, Southwest
State University, Marshall
75th Anniversary Observance: League Charter Cities
Host City Welcome: Mayor George Latimer, St. Paul
CONCURRENT SESSIONS I
(Choose One)
9:45-11:00 a.m.
SKILL SESSION: INFLUENCE SKILLS
Developing a Flexible Influence Style to Match Your Situation
Look at leadership development
· Situational leadership: overview and its applications in
city government
· Environmental and behavioral clues: guide to recognizing the
needs of the people and the situation
· Yellow Brick Road: three major styles
· The right style for the situation: application in real
situations--practical exercises
SKILL SESSION: LEADERSHIP SKILLS
Conducting Public Hearings
· Purpose of public hearings
Legal requirements
Mock public hearing - do's and don'ts of the hearing process
ISSUE INSTITUTE: TIMELY TOPIC
Future Trends for Minnesota Cities
· Recent demographic trends affecting people, organizations
and communities
· Information/tools available to help cities
· ~at your city's role could be in responding to these ~rends
· Key questions to ask to prepare for your city's future,
especially in the area of housing
SKILL SESSION: MANAGEMENT SKILLS
What Organizational Change Does to People
· How organizational change affects people
· How to avoid unanticipated but unavoidable reactions by others
· How to plan for the effects on people of organizational change
CITY BUSINESS:
Legislative Update
Summary of major '88 legislation affecting cities, including:
Property tax reform
· Pay equity .-
· Water surcharge
· Volunteer firefighter reimbursement
· Highway funding
· Workers compensation
· Tax increment financing
SHORT SHOTS I
(Choose one)
11:15 a.m.-12:15 p.m.
Lease-Purchase
· Lease-purchase as a financing tool
· Potential uses for cities
Reasons for considering lease-purchase
· Legal limits on authority to incur debt
Examples of lease-purchase agreements
Case study: financing City of Lakeville city hall construction
Metro Recycling Mandates
· Description of legislative mandates
Differences in recycling requirements for metro and greater
Minnesota cities
Overview: Twin Cities metro recycling mandate
Metropolitan area recycling programs that work
Greater ~.:innesota City Recycling Mandates
Description of state mandate
· Distinguishing features of recycling mandates for cities
outside Twin Cities metro area
· Effective recycling programs in greater Minnesota
An Introduction to Municipal Electric Power
· Facts to know about public ownership of electric power
· What public power is, facts to know.
. Key differences between private, consumer-owned and
municipally-owned systems
· Politics of public power: political structures of municipal
power systems and the pros and cons of each
· History of public power: comparative rates
· Anti-trust issues in the electric power industry
· Benefits of public ownership
· Case studies
CITY BUSINESS
General Legislation and Personnel Committee
· Role of committee members
· Introduction to new policy development process
· 1988 Legislation: Implications for future policy
· Policy development work plan
Elections and Ethics Committee
· Identify issues for '88 policy development
Formation and work plan for task force on ethics
· Outlo'ok for '89 legislative session
EXHIBITORS' LUNCH
12:15-1:45 p.m.
GENERAL SESSION
1:45-2:45 p.m.
Henry Cisneros, Mayor, City of San Antonio, Texas,
Former National League of Cities President
"The Nation and Its Cities - A New Federal Agenda?"
SHORT SHOTS II
(Choose one)
3:00-4:00 p.m.
Contracting for Services
Contracting out vs. using city staff
· Anti-trust considerations - one or many providers?
Contracting/bid requirements
· Termination of contract
. Assuring contractor provides satisfaction
· Monitoring contractors' performance
· Contract administration
Legal & Charitable Gambling
· Commission philosophy and mandate
· Review of current regulations (emphasis on new rules
effective Spring '88)
· Practical problems for city operators
- What to look for and how to monitor
· Examples of city gambling operations
Implementing One-Call Notification
· Overview of state legislation
· Implementing statewide system
· Organizational process, local issues/procedures
Rate structure
How Cities Can Make Effective Use of Pooling?
· The how-to's of participating in
Minnesota Municipal Money Market (4M) Fund
Minnesota Cities Capital Equipment Borrowing Program
· Benefits and savings of CEBP
· 4M Fund performance and comparison of investment alternatives
CITY BUSINESS
Development Strategies Committee
· Role of committee members
· Introduction to new policy development process
Impact of '88 Session on policy priorities
· Committee work plan for policy issues for '89
CITY NIGHT
6:30-10:30 p.m.
St. Paul Salutes the Arts at Landmark Center
"Cabaret Night"
Taste of St. Paul"
THURSDAY, JUNE 9
8:00-9:00 a.m.
75th Anniversary Observance - LMC President's Breakfast
for Past Presidents
EXHIBITS OPEN
9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
(Coffee available in exhibit area)
CONCURRENT SESSIONS II
(Choose one)
9:00-10:30 a.m.
SKILL SESSIONS: INFLUENCE SKILLS
Communicating With the Media
Overview/definitions
· Elements of persuasion
· Identification of message and audience
· Crafting message to audience and medium
· How to place your message
Crisis management
Communications planning
SKILL SESSIONS: LEADERSHIP SKILLS
Serving Your Constituents - Part I
· Meeting Master, Part I
. Focus on non-council meetings
· Deciding when and when not to meet
· Targeting meeting objectives
· Designing an agenda that works
(Beneficial for both elected officials and staff)
ISSUE INSTITUTE: PERSONNEL
Signs of Employee Dissatisfaction/Improving Staff Morale
· Indicators of dissatisfaction
· Strategies to detect dissatisfaction and identify causes
Establishing trust
· Identifying problems and players
Providing benefits
· Employee input system
ISSUE INSTITUTE: ECONOMICS
Insurance Issues
· Recent and upcoming LMCIT coverage changes
- Punitive damages
- Inverse condemnation
- Pollution
- Workers' compensation/employers' liability coverage
· Risk management and contracts
- Insurance requirements
-Hold harmless agreements
- #Additional-insured# 'listings
- Joint powers contracts - liability and coverage issues
CITY BUSINESS
Land User Energy, Transportation Policy Committee
· Introduction to new policy development process
· Review of impact of '88 legislation
· Development of committee work plan
· Future policy issues
BREAK
10:30-10:45 a.m.
CONCURRENT SESSIONS
(Choose one)
10:45 a.m.-12:15 p.m.
SKILL SESSIONS: LEADERHSIP SKILLS
Serving Your Constituents - Part II
· Meeting Master, Part II
· Focus on non-council meetings
Promoting good attendance
· Getting others to champion your cause
(Beneficial for both elected officials and staff)
SKILL SESSIONS: MANAGEMENT SKILLS
The Task of Leadership in a Time of Change
· Building concensus on defining goals
Assuring results orientation
· Assigning accountability
. Giving direction to achieve goals
ISSUE INSTITUTES: ECONOMICS
Economic Dsvelopment In Rural Areas--City Initiatives
Focus in on the how-to's - Steps to follow such as
. Meeting with city and community leaders
· Coming up with a budget
· Deter~r~ining whether to establish a port authority
· Establishing a loan pool
Identifying potential land and buildings for ne~ industry
Working for possible expansion of existing industries
. Knowing what economic development tools are available
ISSUE INSTITUTES: TIMELY TOPIC
Implementing Title III at the Local Level
History and purpose of Superfund, Title III requirements
· Hazardous materials emergencies: a special report (video tape)
· Organizing Title III in Minnesota
· Development of local emergency plan
- Planning requirements
- Procedures for developing local emergency response plans
· Chemical reporting requirements and data prccessing systems
CITY BUSINESS.-
Revenue Sources Policy Committee
Analysis of property tax reform: impacts on cities' current
and future fiscal status
· Levy limits: implications for future policy development and
expectations for FY '89 city budgets
· Presentations by state finance and legislative leaders
MAYORS ASSOCIATION/MINI-CONFERENCE LUNCHEON
~12:30-2:00 p.m.
Douglas Kiker, NBC-TV Political/News Correspondent
"The Stakes for Cities in the '88 Election"
CONCURRENT SESSIONS IV
(Choose one)
2:15-3:30 p.m.
SKILLS SESSION: INFLUENCING SKILLS
Marketing Your City
Taking a community profile
· Involving staff and elected officials
. Marketing techniques
· Media choices
Organizing the communications effort
SKILLS SESSION: MANAGEMENT SKILLS
What Every Elected Official Should Know About The Budget
. Strategic planning
. Goal setting
· Council's role and how to assess performance
· Legal requirements for preparing a budget
· Identifying budget responsibilities
ISSUE INSTITUTES: ECONOMIC
Municipal Finance Today and Tomorrow
What's happening with city financing
Supplemental revenue sources under current law
· New sources of revenue - what's been tried elsewhere
The aftermath of property tax reform
ISSUE INSTITUTES: TIMELY TOPIC
AIDS: Policies For Cities
· Hiring
Retention and job reassignment
· Emergency response/testing
· Training and education of work force
Treatment facilities
LEAGUE ANNUAL MEETING
3:45-5:00 p.m.
LEAGUE RECEPTION AND BANQUET
6:30-9:00 p.m.
FRIDAY,.JUNE 10
Final General Session
9:00-10:30 a.m.
David McNally, "The Power of Purpose"
WESTONKA INTERVENTION COMMUNIQUE
A Newsletter for
Westonka Intervention Volunteers
and their' Supporters
Issue I
bJay, ]988
"FOR YEARS I HAD FELT THERE WAS NO HOPE FOR OUR FAMILY.
AFTER THE ADVOCATES FROM WESTONKA INTERVENTION CAME OUT TO
MY HOME AND SPOKE WITH ME, I REALIZED ]'HAT OUR PROBLEM WAS
NOT UNCOMMON AND THAT THERE IS HELP FOR US. MY PRAYERS HAD
FINALLY BEEN ANSWERED."
A Westonka Resident
FAMILY VIOLENCE: INTERVENTION STRATEGIES
From a Publication of the [i. S. Department of Health and Human
Services
In recent years, family violence has become a topic of major
public concern. This has been a gradual process of increasing
public awareness that began with the realization that parents
were maltreating their children. More recently, spouse abuse has
been recognized by the public as an extensive and serious
problem, separate from that of child maltreatment.
Violence among family members is a multifaceted problem ~hich .is
influenced by cultural norms, personal values, and stress
factors. Professionals in a variety of social service, medical
and mental health fields, and in law enforcement, have a role in
assisting families engaged in violent behavior as well as in the
prea'ention of famii3~ violence, if professionals are to be
successful Jn these efforts, they must have an understanding of
both family interactions and the larger social context of ~chich
families are a part.
Violence among faintly members falls into a number of categories,
including child abuse, spouse abuse, sibling violence, violence
by a child against a parent, and violence against elderly family
members. Often several of these types of family violence occur
~ithin the same family. Violent incidents in families are
usually not isolated events; generally, family violence is
~ntense, recurrent and will continue and possibly escalate unless
there is some outside intervention.
FROM THE DIRECTOR
In order to better keep our lines of communication open, Westonka
Intervention will be publishing a newsletter. This is a very
exciting issue, because it is our first! Look it over and please
offer any suggestions for the next issue. Your input and ideas
are welcome.
In February, I was the guest speaker for the Westonka Rotary.
Somehow, speaking about domestic violence at a Ya]entine's
Luncheon seemed untimely. Regardless, I received a warm welcome
and a good response.
The main topic of concern at our February Board meeting was the
upcoming ' Urban Development Hennepin County Block Grants. The
Board ~lembers decided to contact City Council Members and promote
Westonka Intervention. Their efforts paid off. In March, the
city of Minnetrista voted to ~ive Westonka Intervention $]800.00
and the c~ty of Mound voted to give us $5,300.00 in C.D.B.G.
moneys. Also, the city of Orono decided to grant us $]000.00 of
these funds to helps us continue our group. %fhat a wonderful
vote of support from our cities! I aisc received a ~reat deal of
praise from the cities for all of our work.
In April I attended, alone with other local social service
providers, a West Hennepin Human Services community meeting at
St. John's Lutheran ~hurch. .Statistics were presented to show
that Mound has ~a very high poverty level, which is contr~butin~
to our great need for social services in this area. A committee
is being set up to develop a plan that will address some of the
human service needs in this area.
By Val Hessburg
Director and Board Member of Westonka Intervention
WORKING TOGETHER MAKES A DIFFERENCE
There are times when ~t appears like no one cares, no one will
listen, and no one will help, especially ~f ~ou are a v~ctim ~of
domestic abuse. That is why advocates are so vital to the
success of Westonka Intervention.
Advocates, in many cases, may be the only glimmer of hope victims
will experience. Advocates play a major role in offering
assistance to those in need. Advocates "reach out" to victims,
offering guidance and support that restores confidence during
times of emotional stress.
To be a Westonka Intervention advocate is to be a part of a
vision that began in ]984, and is even brighter today. People
helping people caught up in the cycle of violence.
~estonka Intervention Board of Directors is committed l,o the
continued success of this vital program and thanks the Westonka
Intervention volunteers for their dedication.
By Craig A. Anderson
Chief of Police
St. Bonifacius/Minnetrista Police Department
Board Member of Westonka Intervention
VOLUNTEERS NEEDED
Westonka Intervention is always in need of volunteers for all
aspects of the project. If you kno~ of someone or have any
friends that are interested in helping in any ~ay, please let us
kno%~.
We are hopin.~ to start a support group again. If you know of
anyone that might benefit from th~s, please contact us.
Remember - Get your Contact ~ith Victim Reports to Nancy L. as
soon as possible after the incident~ Thank you for your help in
this matter.
We will be having an Appreciation Dinner for the volunteers of
Westonka Intervention. Tentatively set for the f~rst weekend in
June, we will let you know the specifics at a later date. I am
hoping you'll all be able to attend!
We really appreciate all your help. Without volunteers, we would
not be where we are today. Thank you!
By Sue L.
Volunteer Coordinator of Westonka Intervention
CRISIS PHONE
"Westonka Intervention. Can I help you?"
This is what people hear when they call our daytime crisis phone.
I pray I'll be saying the same thing 10 years from no~. We've
come a long way and have proven over and over again we are a much
needed service.
Something very interesting has been happening over the last year.
We are not on]>' Kettin~ ca]Is for domestic violence, but people
are calling us for a number of reasons such as rape, teen
pre~nancy, runa~,~ays, information on welfare, housing, legal aid,
etc. These calls are, of course, referred to the specializing
agencies. We also receive an enormous amount of repeat and
anonymous telephone calls. Whatever the reason, they express
such gratitude for any help we can give them.
And my thanks to all of the advocates for seeing to it that I
receive the Victim Reports for our files.
Following is a log of our Current Victim Statistics from November
], 1987 through May 6, 1988:
Number of Interventions with Victims:
Married Women ~ith children ]0
Married Women wit. hout children 1
Single Women with children 7
Single Women without children 2
Married Men ~ith children 0
Married Men without children 0
Parent and sibling 3
TOTAL INTERVENTIONS 23
Of these 23 interventions, 20 involved ALCOHOL
On our Crisis Telephone, we received:
On-going support telephone calls 32
Anonymous calls 7
Miscellaneous calls (housing, legal aid,
welfare, etc.) 18
By Nancy L.
Crisis Phone Advocate for %{estonka Intervention
WESTONKA INTERVENTION
Editor's Note:
If you have any ideas for our
newsletter, please let us know~
P. O. BOX 34
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
MINUTES OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
MAY 9, I9~8
Present were: Acting Chairman William Thal ; Commissioners Vern
Andersen, William Meyer, GeofF Michael, Brad Sohns and Frank
Weiland; Council Representative Elizabeth Jansen; City Manager
Ed Shukle; City Planner Mark Koegler; Building Official Jan
Bertrand and Secretary Marjorie Stutsman. Chairman Thomas Reese
and Commissioner Kenneth Smith were absent and excused.
Also present were the Following interested persons: Dr. C. V.
Carlson, Anita M. Carlson, Dale W. Sherburne, Gordon Swanson and
Paul Larson.
MINUTES
The minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of April 25, i988
were presented for consideration. Andersen moved and Meyer
seconded a motion to approve the minutes as published. The vote
was unanimously in Favor.
BOARD OF APREALS
1o Case No. 88-710 Proposed Vacation of a slope easement over
portion of Lot 2 and part of Lot 3, Block 1, Pembroke / 3006
Inverness Lane
Applicant, Gordon T. Swenson, was present.
The Building OFFicial, Jan Bertrand, explained that this slope
easement was obtained when Tuxedo Boulevard was being improved.
The City Engineer has reviewed this proposal and Feels that the
City no longer real ly needs the easement as long as we could
control the condition of the grading during the construction of
the home and that the condition be For the approval of the slope
easement vacation as long as the grading is approved when the
building permit is submitted and shows the location of the
proposed home and all of the items that are listed on the sheet
with the City Engineer's recommendation. There is some grading
that will have to be added to the site plan in %he packet.
The Planning Commission discussed; there were no plans to take
off the top of the hill and no other variances are thought to be
needed to fit the house onto the lot. A lot size variance was
granted when the road was taken For the cul-de-sac. The easement
vacation would give applicant more Flexibility For the placement
of his home.
The Acting Chairman opened the public hearing and as no one
wished to make any comments, closed the public hearing.
Andersen moved and Weiland seconded a motion to recommend the
vacation of slope easement with the condition that grading is
not allowed until a survey for a building permit is submitted
Planning Commission Minutes
May 9, !988 - Page 2
and approved, which shows the location of the proposed house
and all existing and proposed elevations (City Engineer's
recommendation). The vote was unanimously in Favor.
The public hearing by the City Council will be on May lO, 1988.'
Case No. 88-711 Conditional Use Permit For Wholesale
Operation For paint and wallpaper business at 2365 Commerce
Boulevard; Lot 5 and Part of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision
No. 167 (PID 14-117-24 44 0003) and the North 50 Feet of the
East 200 Feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 167
(PID !4-]17-24 44 0006). Owner Dr. Charles Carlson and
Applicant Dale W. Sherburne were present.
The City Planner, Mark Koegler, commented that proposal is
straight Forward and similar to the one reviewed a year or so ago
For Meisel Hardware. He reviewed his report and stated that
staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit.
The Acting Chairman opened the public hearing. Dr. Carlson
commented it would add business to town and offered to answer any
questions on the proposal. No one wished to be heard anO the
Acting Chairman closed the public hearing.
Weiland moved and Andersen seconded a motion to accept the
recommendation of the staff For the approval of the conditional
use permit For the paint and wallpaper business with the condi-
tion that any modification of the building will need to comply
with all applicable sections of the building code and zoning
ordinance and also of the sign ordinance. The vote was unani-
mously in Favor.
The public hearing date was discussed and later in the meeting,
Paul Larson questioned if this item coulO be heard in May because
of a proposed June 1st closing date. The Manager advised there
was a scheduled Special Meeting on Thursday, May 26th. This
would give the required time for the legal notice.
Land Reoistration Case 19433
Lots 94, 95 and 96, Phelps Island Park
The City Manager distributed a letter From McCombs Frank ROdS
Associates, Inc. which stated that the City Attorney questioned
what affect the granting of easements would have on these lots in
obtaining building permits. He noted that the City needs an
additional 3 Foot easement along the west side of Lot 94 and a 20
Foot wide easement along the north side of all three lots For
Planning Commission Minutes
May.9, 19@8 - Page 3
street and utility purposes. City curb is on private property.
The owner is willing to give easements, but at some point, the
owner is going to want to come in for permits for three buildable
lots. Various alternatives were discussed at length by the
Commission.
Jansen moved a motion that the Planning Commission would like
to see the situation corrected so that all the lots are 6,000
square Feet and to do that, there is going to be some type of
sub,~ivision required and they strongly recommend and would
entertain and support the idea of waiving the Fee to accomplish
~his subdivision because of the City obtaining the easements
From the owner. The motion was seconded by Sohns.
The vote was Andersen, Michael, Sohns, Thal and Jensen in favor
and Meyer and Weiland opposed. The reason given for the nay
votes was that the opportunity exists to make into two
unquestionable building sites facing Cardiff Lane and the fees
could be Waived.
This will go to the Council on May ~0, 1988.
DISCUSSION/ETC.
The City Manager reported that the Ndrwood Lane cul-de-sac was
addressed at the April ]2th meeting and it was agreed the
utilities would be put in at this time provided the property
owner gave the easement; however, he will not so Norwood Lane
will go through to Bartlett and the only improvement will be the
storm sewer.
Council Representative Elizabeth Jensen advised that the City is
putting together a Citizens Task Force to look at the needs of
the Fire Department and City Hall. There are to be 4 staff
persons plus 7 citizens. She believes someone From the Planning
Commission should be on the Task Force. Commissioner Sohns
expressed 8n interest, but wanted to know the amount of time
involved, it was decided by the Commission that someone From
their body witl be a member of the Task Force.
ADJOURNMENT
Sohns moved and Weiland seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting
at 8:45 P.M. All were in favor, so meeting was adjourned.
Attest:
William Thal, Acting Chair
PLEASE PRINT YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS BELOW: (RETURN TO THE CITY CLERK)
17.
....... '.-. ................ ..:.:M ::'~'~~
22.
23.
24.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
Proposed Resolution
Case No. 88-711
RESOLUTION NO. 88-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR OPERATION OF A WHOLESALE BUSINESS AT
2365 COMMERCE BOULEVARD, PID ~14-117-24 44 0003
AND PID ~14-117-24 44 0006
WHEREAS, the City Council on May 26, 1988 held a public
hearing pursuant to Section 23.505 of the Hound Code of
Ordinances, to consider the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit
for the operation of a wholesale and retail paint and wallpaper
business at 2365 Commerce Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is within the B-l, Central
Business Zone which allows "Wholesale and Assembly Businesses" by
--conditional use permit; and
WHEREAS, adequate parking exists in and around the existing
building, to satisfy existing and future needs for the building;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request
and does recommend approval; and
WHEREAS, all persons wishing to be heard were heard.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, that the conditional use permit is
hereby approved subject to the following condition:
- Any future modification of the building shall comply with the
provisions of the building code, sign ordinance and zoning
ordinance.
HEAR1NG NOTICE
C]TY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A WHOLESALE
PAINT AND WALLPAPER BUSINESS AT 2365
COMMERCE BOULEVARD; LOTS 5 AND -PART OF
AND 6, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 167
PID NUMBERS 14-117-24 44 0003/0006
NOTICE IS HEREBY G]VEN, that the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, will meal: in the Council Chambers, 5341
Haywood Road, at 7:30 P.M. on Thursday, May 26~ ]988 to consider
an application for a Conditional Use Permit f=or a Wholesale Paint
and Wallpaper Business at 2365 Commerce Boulevard, legal
-" description:
Lot 5 and that part of Lot 4 lying South of a line running from
SoutheaSt corner of said Lot to a point on West line of said Lot
distance 14.82 feet North from Southwest Corner thereof;
Auditor's Subdivision 167 (PID 14-117-24 44 0003) and North 50
feet of the East 200 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision 167
(PID 14-117-24 44 0006)
All persons appearing at said hearing with reference
to the above will be heard at this meeting. '.
Francene C. Clark, City Clerk
Publish in The Laker May 16, 1988.
3030 Harl>or L~ne North
Bl~g. II, Suite
Minne&ooli$, MN 55a,47-2175
612/553-1950
PLANNIN6 REPORT
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Hark Koegler, City Planner
DATE: Hay 3, 1988
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit
APPLICANT: Dale Sherburne
OWNER: Dr. Charles Carlson
LOCATION: 2365 Commerce Boulevard (Old Contel Building)
CASE NUHBER: 88-711
VHS FILE NUMBER: 88-310-A6-ZO
EXISTING ZONING: Central Business (B-l)
COHPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial
BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing to acquire the ~ld Contel
building (11,800 sq. ft.) for use as a paint and wall-paper
business containing bo'th wholesale and retail operations.
Initially, approximately 50% of the building will be used for the
paint and wallpaper business and the remaining 50% for rental
offices. Eventually, plan's call for the building to be utilized
entirely by Hr. Sherbu~rne's business.
The proposed paint and wallpaper business will be primarily a
wholesale operation. Host deliveries and shipments will be via
UPS and it is anticipated that a semi truck delivery will occur
approximately once per week. Total employment in the building is
estimated at 15 - 20.
COHHENTS: The building housing the proposed paint and wallpaper
business formerly contained offices for 73 Contel employees.
Parking is available adjacent to and behind the buildin~ and in
traffic generated by the proposed use shoul~ have a negligible
impact on the downtown area. Proposed traffic generation is
consistent with the Meisel Hardware proposal which received a
conditional use permit in 1987 but chose to ultimately relocate
elsewhere.
Under the Mound Zoning Code, wholesale and assembly operations
are conditional uses in the B-1 zone. The proposed business
qualifies as a wholesale operation. The retail portion of the
business is permitted in the B-1 zone.
RECOMHENDAT.ION: Staff recommends approval of the conditional use
permit, for the proposed paint and wallpaper business. Any
modification of the building will need to comply with all
applicable sections of both the building code and zoning
ordinance.
RECEiYED
Case '.o. '7' / /
CiTY OF HOUND
':~."-'"' ~ (Please type the following infor~tion)
Owner's Name
Address
Day Phone No.
e
Applicant '(if other than. owner):
Day Phone No.
Type of Request: ( ) Variance (~) Conditional Use Permit
( ) Zoning Interpretation & Review
( ) Wetland Permit ( ) P.U.D.
'\
( ~ Amendment
( ) Sign Permit
( )*Other
*If other; specify:
Present Zoning District
Existing Use(s) of Property
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, or conditional use permit or
other zoning procedure for this property? ~ if so, list date(s) of
list date(s) of application, action taken and provide Resolution No.(s)
Copies of previous resolutions shall accompany present request.
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required
papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I consent to the entry in
or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City
of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be required b.y~law~
"Signature of Applicant / ~ ~ / Date
lanning Commission Reco~endation: Accept staff recommendation'of the conditional dse ~
permit for the proposed paint and waJlpaper business on Ina cono~t~on ~nall all appllcaDl'~
sections of the build ng code, zoning code and sign ordinance be complied with,
Date 5-9-88
Council Action:
Resolution No.
Date
Procedure for &onditional Use Permit
£.
F.
Location of: 'Signs, easements, underground utillties, etc.
Indlc~te North compass
Any addltlonml informmtion as may reasonably be required by the City Staff
and applicable Sec%ions of she Zoning Ordinance.
III Request for a Condltlon~l Use
A. All informat|on requested below, a s~te plan ~s described ~n Part 1~, and
a development schedule providing reasonable guarantees for the completion
of the constructlon must be provided before a hearing w~ll be scheduled.
B. TyPe of development for which m ~onditional Use Permit is requested: 1. ~onditional Use (Specify):
· Current Zoning and Designation in the future Land Use Plan for Hound
Development Schedule:
1. A development schedule shall be attached to this application providing
reasonable guarantees for the' completion of the proposed development.
~. Estimate of cost of the project: $. -
Density (for resider~tial developments only):
1. .Number' of structures:
2. Dw~lllng Units Per Structure:
a. Number of type: '-
Efficiency
Bedroom
Bedroom
Bedroom
Lot area per.dwe.lllng unit:
4. Total lot area:
IV. Effects of the Proposed Use
A. List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vlci'nity, in-
cluding, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking,
and, describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts.
U ?.~ b~.~ ~v~-~ v ,~.~.,.~ P~c/-~ uP ..
,, ,,
f
lO
6
7