2002-05-14PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
cITY 0r MOUND MiSSibN STATEMENT: Th~ Cie 0f'M0undl ~0ugh ieamw°rk and c00Peration, rro~ides at a reaSOnable
cost, quality services that respond tO the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flom'ishing community.
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY~ MAY 14~ 2002 - 7:30 PM
MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call
vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
PAGE
1. OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS
*CONSENT AGENDA
*A. APPROVE MINUTES' APRIL 23, 2002 REGULAR MEETING 2144-2150
*B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 2151-2179
*C. APPROVE PARADE PERMIT 2180-2181
*D. APPROVE PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 1 FOR IMPROVEMENT 2182'-2187
PROJECT 2002 - MOUND VISIONS 2ND ADDITION
*E. APPROVE PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 1 FOR WESTEDGE 2188-2190
BOULEVARD - WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
*F. APPROVE RESOLUTION REESTABLISHING PRECINCT 2191
BOUNDARIES AS REQUIRED BY MN STATUTES 204B. 14,
SUBD 3(c)
*G.
APPROVE VARIANCE/PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION
CASE #02-10:2136 BELMONT - ANDERSON
2192-2224
*H.
*I.
*j
APPROVE LIABILITY INSURANCE RENEWAL, NOT WAIVING
THE MONETARY LIMITS
APPROVE CONVEYANCE OF A TRACT OF LAND TO THE
HRA FOR RECONVEYANCE TO THE POST OFFICE PROJECT
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION -
REQUEST TO CLOSE WILSHIRE BLVD BETWEEN MAYWOOD
& LAKEWOOD ON JUNE 1, 2002 FOR 51 ST ANNUAL FISH FRY
2225-2230
2231-2232
2233
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
o
o
11.
12.
13.
14.
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY
ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.)
ACTION ON PROPOSED CHANGE TO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AS IT
RELATES TO THE FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT OF 1993
2234-2238
SKATE PARK
A. ACTION ON SKATE PARK AGREEMENT
B. ACTION ON PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT
2239-2247
2248-2262
METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT
A. ACTION ON RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT
B. ACTION ON MODIFICATIONS TO THE SUBDIVISION
AGREEMENT
2263-2265
2266-2267
WESTERN AREA FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY (WAFTA)
A. ACTION ON RESOLUTION APPROVING GRANT APPLICATION
B. ACTION ON RESOLUTION COMMITTING LOCAL MATCH AND
AUTHORIZING CONTRACT SIGNATURE
2268-2289
LIQUOR STORE
A. PRESENTATION OF INTERIOR FINISHES & FLOOR PLAN
B. ACTION ON LIQUOR STORE AGREEMENT
2290-2292
2293-2301
FIRE/PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY 2302-2310
A. ACTION ON RESOLUTION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER
AN AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
B. ACTION ON RESOLUTION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER
AN AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
ANNUAL REPORTS
A. PUBLIC WORKS DPT GREG SKINNER, PW SUPT
B. BUILDING & PLANNING DPT - SARAH SMITH, COMM DEV.DIR
2311-2314
2315-2323
DISCUSSION/ACTION ON NEW RESDENTIAL/REMODEL
CONSTRUCTION POLICIES & PROCEDURES AND
DISCUSSION/ACTION ON DRIVEWAY STANDARDS
2324-2327
SET SPECIAL MEETING FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR CITY
MANAGER'S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
AG
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
AMM Fax News
LMC Friday Fax
LMCD correspondence
Westonka School District News
FYI: Letter regarding CSAH 15
Report: School Resource Officer
2328-2330
2331-2333
2334-2364
2365-2376
2377-2378
2379-2385
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
Go
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
P.
Letter: City of Shorewood on Phosphorus legislation
Public Safety Building status report
FYI: Profile of Demographic Characteristics
Gillespie Gazette
Mediacom price change
Letter: Mary Opheim
Letter: John Evans
LMCC May schedule
Ice Out 2002
Jaycees charitable gambling donation
2386-2387
2388-2389
2390
2391
2392-2396
2397
2398
2399-2401
2402-2404
2405
15. ADJOURN
COUNCIL BRIEFING
May 14, 2002
Members: Please bring your calendars to this meeting.
Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!!
May 14 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
May
May
June
June
June
June
June
14 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
18 - 8-3 - Recycling Day
1 - Fire Department Fish Fry and Dance to White Sidewalls
3 - DARE Open
8 - American Legion Convention Parade
11 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
11 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
City
Manager absences:
May 24-31: Sweden City Manager's Exchange
June 3: DARE Open
June 18-21: LMC Conference (I will be cutting this back to a day or two.)
July 4 - 14: Vacation
Finance Director Gino Businaro will act as City Manager.
Family/Medical Leave Policy
This policy was mandated in 1993. It is overdue that we have this local policy.
City Manager's Performance Evaluation
We need to reschedule this review. Please bring your calendar.
Human Resources
Building Official Matt Simoneau started April 29. Matt has 10 years of experience and comes most recently
from the City of Blaine, John Breitner, plumbing inspector for 15 years, is being relieved of his responsibilities,
since Matt does plumbing inspections. Metro West Inspections will continue to provide the over-flow
inspection services, with Matt doing plan reviews. Matt has will be keeping regular office hours and field
hours, so the customers and staff can rely on a routine.
Planning and Administration intem Kristie Widden starts after May 15.
Police Chief Len Harrell is scheduled to return on May 20.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jodi Rahn
DATE: May 10, 2002
SUBJECT: 4:00 p.m. Deadline for Redevelopment Proposals
Eight proposals received. Below is a list of three proposals that had complications with the 4:00
p.m. deadline.
**MAHOGANY BAY INN**
Kinko's printing company was the company that put together Mahogany Bay Inn's proposals.
They had electrical failure twice on May 9, 2002 due to the high winds. We received two copies
at 3:54 p.m., four copies at 4:03 p.m. and the final six copies at 4:15 p.m.
**METROPLAINS DEVELOPMENT**
Twelve copies at 4:03 p.m. Veto Anderson called on May 10th, 2002 and explained they were
late due to a car accident on County Road 15.
**LANDFORM**
Twelve copies received at 4:23 p.m. They also had printing problems. Would like to substitute
better quality color images when convenient.
As per John Dean, it is up to the HRA to determine if failure to meet the 4 p.m. deadline can
disqualify them from consideration.
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 23~ 2002
The City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, April 23, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City
Hall.
Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David
Osmek and Peter Meyer.
Others Present: City Attomey, John Dean; City Manager, Kandis Hanson; Community
Development Director, Sarah Smith; City Engineer, John Cameron; Finance Director,
Gino Businaro; Fire Chief, Greg Pederson; Glenn Hurd, Frank~:~:~Weiland, Dale & Becky
Simon, Ann Eberhart, Gerald Babb, Deb Grand, Leah Wey~&~:i Gene Hostetler, Brian
Berent, Rick Todd, Kevin Flaig, Sam Bontrager, Bruce G~son, Tim Williams, Scott
Alden, Rick Williams, Ed Garlock Ray Salazar, Lorri~::H~, J~ff. Anderson Todd
Warner, Orv Burma, Tim VVhitten, Dustin Kern .-~:;::::::~:~" .... '~;ii??:ii: i~
Consent Agenda: Ail items listed under the Cogent Ag~da are considered to be
routine in nature by the Council and wi//be ena~;~iii~:~ roll call vote. There wi//be no
separate discussion on these items unles&,~ Cou~i/'~mber or citizen so requests, in
which eve,~t.~e item will be removed fro~i~.!~::i::G~nse~i~i~genda and considered in
~r!~i'~i~i'~"~lled ~fhe me~fi~;~i~ .to e~:at ~ii~0 p.m. and the Pledge of Allegian~ was
City Manager Ha:~¢~h requ'~(~d ~;~addition of item 9A, Eminent Domain Action for
Hanus requested thg~::::~:iti~[~:~ BM, an u~ate regarding the Subu~an Rate Authority,
and the addition of 9C, {~:~i~g the School Rese~e O~cer with the Mound Westonka
School Distri~.
Meyer requested the addition of item 130, update regarding his next beautification
project for downtown.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to approve the agenda as amended. All voted
in favor. Motion carried.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Hanus requested the removal of item 3E for discussion, and Meyer requested the
removal of item 3G.
1
-2144-
Mound City Council Minutes - April 23, 2002
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Meyer to approve the consent agenda, with the
exception of 3E and 3G. Upon roll call vote taken, all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approve minutes of the April 9, 2002 meeting.
B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $283,159.78.
C. Approve licenses and permits as requested;
D. RESOLUTION NO, 02-46: A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CERTAIN
STREETS OR PORTIONS OF STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF MOUND AS
NO PARKING ZONES
E. (removed)
F. RESOLUTION NO. 02-47: RESOLUTION EXPRESSI~iG COMMITMENT TO
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TRANSIT PARK & RIDEiiilL'OT AND CSAH 15
STREETSCAPE I TRAIL IN DOWNTOWN MOUN~ii:!i~i!iii~i~:~=
ApprOve selection of STS Consultants as e,,n.¥i[e~ent~iiiiii~!3sultant for ERF
Grant contract with Hennepin County. STS~i~?~i~:roposal a~ is ,$28,950.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-48: RESOLUTIQ~i?i~PP~QVING A ~ARIANCE
EXTENSION' FOR THE PROPERTY L0~&TEBii!i~T 4711 CU~BER~ND
CASE ~01-14.
3E. AGREEMENT FOR DISI=
~CESSING SOLUTIONS~
Finance Director,
disposal between NRG an~
representative from NRG
in ten years, ~e
funding for the agreement for leaf
are approximately $12,500. The
fee increase (was $10,000 last year)
~at this is avatuable program for the community.
MOTION by
Between NRG
2002, and expiring
to approve the Agreement for DisPosal
LLC, and the City of MOundi commencing APril 1,
2002, for $12,§00. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
3G. ESOLU;' IBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR JAMES POWERS
AT
Meyer stated thathe requested that thiS itembe pulled from the consent agenda,
because he cannot support it,
MOTION by Meise!~ seconded bY Osmek to adOpt the following resolution. The
following voted in.the ~rlm~ive: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following
voted against: Meyer. MOtion carried.
RESOLUTION NO, 02.49: RESOLUTION APPROVING A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT
FOR JAMES POWERS AT 1791 RESTHAVEN LANE, LOT 1, BLOCK 13,
SHADYWOOD POINT, PID #13-117-24-14-0017.
2
-2145-
Mound City Council Minutes - April 23, 2002
4. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM
NOT ON THE AGENDA.
Todd Warner, 3056 Highland Boulevard. L appeared on behalf of the Westonka Historical
Society, asking to be put on the May 14'" Council agenda to discuss the proposal to
install a commercial dock at Mound Bay Park to accommodate the Minnehaha
Steamboat which currently operates in Excelsior and Wayzata. This item will be on the
Parks & Open Space Commission agenda of May 9th to discuss the concept, and the
council agenda of May 14th. Brown requested that adjacent property owners be invited
to these meetings when appropriate.
Orv Burma, 3011 Island View Drive, presented a dock layout in his neighborhood that
has reduced the number of small water craft slips from four to~i~o. Burma requested
that the Council consider that the BSU be restored to its for one year. This
item will go to the Docks and Commons Commission, come back to the
Council after their consideration. :~,,,~
John Evans, 2025 Arbor Lane, gave positive com:~bnts .mgardingi'~ installation of the
commercial dock to accommodate the Minneh~.and ~mmented that its presence in
Excelsior and Wayzata makes it the heart of the "~Wn.
5. LETTER OF INTENT FOR MOUND ~J~i~iOiR:~::ST~iii!LAND, SHELL AND
~y~ seconded by,~::a~ek t~ii?i~v~:::~ non-binding letter of intent
regarding the proposed new ~:i~i~[ liqu°~?~tore in the proposed Mound Marketplace.
This will not be a legally-bi~g agreement, ~t will only se~e as the outline for a
legally-binding agreement {~e eg~'~'::::i~:b~ Mound Marketplace, LLC, and the City
of Mound. Ali voted infa~or. ~:~:¥~{:~n carri~d.
6. E N GIN E E "'~J E~?~:P D~
City Engineer C~emn gave ~: ove~iew of the 2002 City Projects List. He fu~her
commented on the~i~us projects that are unde~ay, including the water and sewer
project for MetroPlain~:~a~d~[~ Westedge street project that will begin the week of April
2¢. ....
Meyer requested an update regarding CSAH 15, including the status of the former
Dakota Rail. Cameron explained that Hennepin County and the City are proceeding
with the preparation of the right-of-way agreement which is tentatively scheduled to be
heard by the Council at its next meeting.
7. SKATE PARK AGREEMENT
City Attorney Dean provided an overview of the agreement and walked through the
various components of the document, including the fact that it will be a City-owned
park, the descriptions of the various entities involved and referenced in the document,
as well as the various financial commitments that the City must receive prior to
commencement of work.
3
-2146-
Mound City Counoll :Minutes - April 23, 2002
Insura~ and liability issues during the construction phase were also discussed. Dean
commented that a supplemental' policy will need to be purchased from the LMC to cover
construction-related activities.
MOTION by Meyer, seconded bY Osmek to approve the Joint Cooperative Agreement
concept. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
8. RO~LUND HOMES- LANGDON BAY SUBDIVISION REGARDING 30%
HARDCOVER RESTRICTION
Tim mitten and ,Dustin Kern of Roffiund Homes provided a brief overview regarding the
Langdon Bay project and the 30% hardcover restriction. They were aware of the 30%
limitation whi~. was placed, on the development, but regreffu[!Y~iiimisundemtood what
components were 'included in the hardcover calculations. H~i¢~i~dicated that overall they
believe the project will be under the 30% reStriction .....
After discussion, it was decJded that Rottlund Hom~i?;~ill proCe~!?~i~ith the preparation
of the necessary land. use applications which wi!{~ii~==forw~[ded to {~i~'Planning
Commission when appropriate. . '~=:iiiiiiiiiii:~i~;~ ........
.... ~::i==:=iii
9, ADVANCE OF ,FUNDS TO XCEL F~'~i~i~DETAILED ENGINEERING
ESTIMATE
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown
favor. Motion ~ried.
resolution. All voted in
RESOLUTION NO, 02-50:
ENERGY TO PERFORM
AN ADVANCE TO XCEL
lEERING COST ESTIMATE,
9A.
It was noted
for the pr_,o~ty
Maxwell
utilities including
the City's stormwater
in negotiating a purchase agreement
north side of Shoreline Drive, which is owned, by Gary
property is needed to accommodate a number of
MCES, portions am also needed to accommodate
will handle water runoff;
MOTION: by Meyer, seconded by Brown te adopt the following resolution, All voted in
favor. Motion car,~ied,
RESOLUTI~ NO.. 02-51= RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EMINENT DOMAIN
pROCE~]NGS TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY.
9B. sUBURBAN ,RATE AUTHORITY
Hanus re,oft, ed that the S~' recentl.y voted to reduce the fees for the involved
municipeliti~esl N~ also briefly discussed the downtown project whioh invoNed the
relocation of Xce:l~s transmission lines, Hanus reported that Mr. Strommen has
commented that Mound's downtown project may be a good "test case" regarding the
4
-2147-
Mound City Cour~il Minutes - April 23i 2002
placement of underground utilities. Additionally, it's possible that the SIRA may' be
willing to cost share regarding this issue and stated that Mr. Strommen of Kennedy and
Graven is extremely knowledgeable regarding these issues,
9C. SCHOOL RESERVE OFFICER
Hanus inqL~red about the source of funds for the SRO offir~r. Businaro suggested that
City staff report back at an upcoming meeting regarding the status of the application.
10. FIRE/PUBIC SAFETY FACILITY
Fire Department committee member, Jeff Anderson, reviewed the proposed plans and
gave background on the fire/public safety facility, including the process which has been
undertaken to get to this point. ~,:~:iiii~
Manager Hanson reviewed a memorandum dated ~ii:~3,: '-:'? 2002, which explains a
City
streamlined approach which could "fast-track" the proje~i~f t~i~iil!ease-purchase financing
option was utiliZed and the project formally authorize~? Hanso~:~?:~Xplained a
process/timeline which would allow for a 2003 building opening. ::~iii!?:~
Mayor Ueisel reminded the Council that the dis'~si.e~ii~is evening will focus on the
preferred financing method for the new safe~i!!!~Uilding.
There was discussion that followed
timelines, as well as the timing o
land use approval
Todd Warner c~mmented
and than~d the
them to mOve forward with this project,
dediCated efforts to our community.
MOTION
being the fa¢i!!itY~!
B. PRE.FERRED ~FIN~i~i OPTION
Jim Prosser of Ehlers & A~SOCiates gave information on timing of a proposed bond sale,
and the economic climate and bond market.
select the Preferred option as presented,
and Fire Depa~ment in one facility, All voted
MOTION by BroWn, seconded by Hanus to utilize the lease~purchase financing to pay
for a new Public Safety Facility. All voted in favor. Motion ca~ied.
C. ACTION AUTHORIZING RFP,S .FROM ARCHITECT,C;
MOTION bY brown, seconded by Hanus to authorize the Request for Proposals for a
Project Manager, as presented. All voted in favor. Motion carried
5
-2148-
Mound City Council Minutes - April 23, 2002
D. ACTION AUTHORIZING RFP'S FROM PROJECT MANAGERS
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to authorize Request for Proposals for Project
Managers. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
11. ANNUAL REPORT
Finance Director, Gino Businaro, presented the 2001 annual report for the Finance
Department, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the report as presented. All voted
in favor. Motion carried.
12. SPECIAL MEETING FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION FQEi~:iiCITY MANAGER'S
PERFORMANCE EVALATION
MOTION by Brow~by Meyer to hold a sp~¢i~i'~=="m~'~{i~ on Tuesday, May 7,
2002, at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall for consideration of ~!~City Man'~s performance
evaluation. This will be held as an executive ses~i~'h. Al[voted i~'::::~or. Motion
13. IN FO RMATION/MISCE LEAN EOU S~i!~::~::::~::~,:~
B. LMC Friday Fax
C, LMCD correspondence
D. West~ka SChool
Hennepin County
Meeting invitation
Finance
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
~ew
;D
)artment
Article: :ourt Cur~!iuse of Eminent Domain
Community Report and newsletter
Metropolitan ~nouncement
Update on a,, lawsuit costs
Hennepin county notice of public hearing on Body Art Code
Downtown Beautification Projects - report by Peter Meyer - he indicated that
he plans to pursue painting of the boards on the Longpre Building and has
scheduled this event for Saturday, May 4th. The Council determined that
painting projects require formal action by the Council. Meyer announced that a
spruce up/clean-up event will be held at Mound Bay Park on Saturday, May 4th,
from 9:00 a.m. to noon. Hanus requested that Meyer put his comprehensive
projects list and schedule together and place it on an upcoming agenda. Osmek
also requested that Meyer utilize the proper channels including going to the
Parks and Open Space Commission.
6
-2149-
Meu~d City Courmll Minutes - April 23, 2002
1:4. ADJOURN
MOTON .by ~ewn, seconded by Hanus to adjourn at 11:14 p.m.
Motion carried.
All voted in favor.
Attest: City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
7
-2150-
MAY 14~ 2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
041902SUE $650.00
042402SUE $785.87
043002SUE $199.00
050102SUE $202.56
050802SUE $7,455.09
050902SUE $260.46
051402SU E $462,839.01
TOTAL
$472,391.99
-2151 -
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: April 2002
Batch Name 041902SUE User Dollar Amt $650.00
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $650.00
Refer 41902 MOUND POST OFFICE
Cash Payment E 101-41110-322 Postage
Invoice 041902
Transaction Date 4/19/2002
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
$0.00 In Balance
· 4/19/2002
SPRING CITY CONTACAT
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$650.00
Total
$650.00
$650.00
$650.00
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$650.00
$650.00
04119/02 1:54 PM
Page1
-2152-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: April 2002
Batch Name
042402SUE
Payments
Refer 42402 HANSON, KANDIS
G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical
4/23/2002
Cash Payment
Invoice 042402
Transaction Date
User Dollar Amt $785.87
Computer Dollar Amt $785.87
$0.00 In Balance
4/24/2002
REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE
$430.84
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total $430.84
Refer 42402 LAKE MINNETONKA CONVERSATI 4/24/2002
Cash Payment E 281-45210-430 Miscellaneous MULTIPLE DOCK APPLICATION $270,00
Invoice 042402
Transaction Date 4/23/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $270.00
Refer 42402 PETTY CASH 412412002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH $85.03
Invoice 042402 PO 17399
Transaction Date 4/23/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $85,03
Fund Summary
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
101 GENERAL FUND $515.87
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $270.00
$785.87
04/23/02 10:11 AM
Page 1
Pre-Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Compute $785.87
Total $785.87
-2153-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
04130102 1:43 PM
Page 1
Current Period: May 2002
Batch Name 043002SU E User Dollar Amt $199.00
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $199.00
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 43002 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVIC 4/30/2002
E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION MAY 8-10, 2002 $199.00
Cash Payment
Invoice 043002
Transaction Date 4/30/2002
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $199.00
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$199.00
$199.00
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$199.00
$199.00
-2154-
CITY OFMOUND
Payments
05/02/02 8:16 AM
Page 1
Batch Name 050102SUE User Dollar Amt $202.56
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $202.56
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 50102 HARRELL, LEONARD 5/1/2002
G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $179.56
Cash Payment
Invoice 050102
Transaction Date
5/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $179.56
Refer 50102 MINNEAPOLIS DEPARTMENTHEA 5/1/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training WATERWORKS OPERATION EXAM $23.00
Invoice 050102
Transaction Date 5/1/2002 .Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $23.00
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
601 WATER FUND
Pre-Written Check
10100 Ma~uetteBank Mound
$179.56
$23.00
$202.56
$0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$202.56
$202.56
-2155-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05~08~02 2:53 PM
Page 1
Current Period: May 2002
I~atch Name O.~OS0~U[~ User Dollar Ami ~?,4.~.~.0§
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $7,455.09
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 50802 BUSINARO, GINO 5/8/2002
REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $233.28
Cash Payment
Invoice 050802
Transaction' Date
G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical
5/6/2002
Refer 50802 EISS, HELEN
Cash Payment R 281-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues
Invoice 050802
Transaction Date 5/3/2002
Refer 50802 GRAND, DEB
Cash Payment
Invoice 050802
Transaction Date
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/8/2002
REFUND STAIRWAY FEE
G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical
5/6/2002
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/8/2O02
REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 50802
Cash Payment
Invoice 050802
~sh Payment
?Voice 050802
Cash Payment
Invoice 050802
5/8/2002
13-117-24-33-0017 PROPERTY TAX
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
E 455-45381-300 Professional Srvs
E 455-46381-300 Professional Srvs 13-117-24-33-0016 PROPERTY TAX
E 401-47000-525 Other Capital Improveme 13-117-24-33-0011 PROPERTY TAX
Total $233.28
$50.00
Total $50.00
Transaction Date 4/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEAL TH 5/8/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training WATERWORKS OPERATION EXAM
Invoice 050802
Transaction Date 5/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay 04-02 DRILLS
Invoice 042802
Cash Payment E 222-42260-390 General Maint-Fire 04-02 MAINTENANCE
Invoice 042802
Cash Payment E 222-42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salaries 04-02 RESCUE
Invoice 042802
Transaction Date 5/7/2002
Refer 50802 PETTY CASH
Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 050802
Transaction Date 5/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 50802 SPEEDWAYSUPERAMERICA (FIR 5/8/2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 04-23-02 GAS CHARGES
voice 042302
I'ransaction Date 4/30/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 50802 SPEEDWAYSUPERAMERICA (P/W 5/8/2002
Total
$116.00
$116.00
$380.64
$361.33
$289.36
Total $1,031.33
$23.00
Total $23.00
$20.00
$0.oo
$2,53O.25
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,550.25
5/8/2002
REPLENISH PETTY CASH MISCELLANEOUS $18.64
ITEMS
Total $18.64
$299.96
Total $299.96
-2156-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/08/02 2:53 PM
Page 2
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment
Invoice 042302
Cash Payment
Invoice 042302
Cash Payment
Invoice 042302
Transaction Date
Refer
E 101-41310-212 Motor Fuels
E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels
E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels
4/30/2002
51402 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (PAR
Cash Payment E 101-45200-212 Motor Fuels
Invoice 042302
Cash Payment E 101-41500-212 Motor Fuels
Invoice 042302
Transaction Date 4/30/2002
Refer 50802 SPEED'WAy supERAMER~CA (POL
Cash Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels
Invoice 050802
Transaction Date 5/3/2002
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
455 TIF 1-2
801 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
THRU 04-23-02 GAS CHARGES
$1,095.98
THRU 04-23-02 GAS CHARGES
$471.27
TH RU 04-23-02 GAS CHARGES
$123.01
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,690.26
5/8/2002
THRU 04-23-02 GAS CHARGES $236.09
THRU 04-23-02 GAS CHARGES
$12.32
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $248.41
5/8/2002
THRU 04-23-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $1,193.96
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,193.96
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$2,887.63
$2,850.21
$5O.OO
$289.36
$741.97
$494.27
$123.01
$18.64
$7,455.09
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$7,455.09
$7,455.09
-2157-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/09/02 1:42 PM
Page 1
Current Period: May 2002
Batch Name 050902SUE User Dollar Amt $260.46
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $260.46
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 50902 GOLDEN VALLEY, CITY OF 5/9/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training 05-16-02 MUNICIPALS DINNER $34.00
Invoice 050902 PO 14871
Cash Payment E 101-42110-331 Meeting/Travel 05-16-02 MUNICIPALS DINNER $34.00
Invoice 050902 PO 17403
Cash Payment E 101-42110-331 Meeting/Travel 05-16-02 MUNICIPALS DINNER $34.00
Invoice 050902 PO 17403
Cash Payment E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training 05-16-02 MUNICIPALS DINNER $11.33
Invoice 050902 PO 14872
Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training 05-16-02 MUNICIPALS DINNER $11.33
Invoice 050902 PO 14872
Cash Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training 05-16-02 MUNICIPALS DINNER $11.34
Invoice 050902 PO 14872
Cash Payment E 101-42400-434 Conference & Training 05-16-02 MUNICIPALS DINNER $34.00
Invoice 050902 PO 16972
Cash Payment E 609-49750-331 Meeting/Travel 05-16-02 MUNICIPALS DINNER $34.00
invoice 050902 PO 16743
~sh Payment E 609-49750-331 Meeting/Travel 05-16-02 MUNICIPALS DINNER $34.00
Invoice 050902 PO 16743
Transaction Date 5/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $238.00
Refer 50902 PETTY CASH 5/9/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH $22.46
Invoice 050902
Transaction Date 5/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $22.46
Fund Summary
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
101 GENERAL FUND $147.33
601 WATER FUND $11,33
602 SEWER FUND $11.34
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $90.46
$260.46
Pre-Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Compute $260.46
Total $260.46
-2158-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 1
Current Period: May 2002
Batch Name 051402SUE User Dollar Amt $462,839.01
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $462,839.01
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 51402 AMERICAN EXPRESS 5/14/2002
BATTERIES,ETC.
E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies
PO 17398
E 101-42110-208 Instructional Supplies
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Transaction Date 5/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Memhandise For R ICE
Invoice 55212109
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE
Invoice 55212712
Transaction Date 5/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 ASPEN EMBROIDERY AND DESIG 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms EMBROIDERY
Invoice 042902
~ash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms
?/oice 042902
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 042902
Transaction Date 4/29/2002
I iiI
Refer 51402 BELLBOY CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 23616100
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 23616100
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 23714400
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
InvOice 23669100
Transaction Date 4/30/2002
61402 BERR CO : : ' cOMpANY
E 101-41110-331 Meeting/Travel
E 101-45200-331 Meeting/Travel
E 101-42400-331 Meeting/Travel
Cash Payment
Invoice 285050
Cash Payment
Invoice 285050
Cash Payment
Invoice 285050
Transaction Date 5/3/2002
Refer 51402 BLANCH, E.W.
Cash Payment G 101-22827 Landgon View
voice 101-22827
Transaction Date 5/2/2002
Refer ' 51402 BRI'DGE, ED .........
04-11-02 NICCUM LODGING
EMBROIDERY
EMBROIDERY
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
COFFEE
COFFEE
COFFEE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
ESCROW REFUND/CLOSE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
$99.01
$313.OO
Total $412.01
$115.80
$85.20
Total $201.00
$23.33
$23.33
$23.34
Total $70.00
$o.oo
$1,606.80
$2,429.20
$1,938.75
Total $5,974.75
$35.00
$17.50
$17.50
Total $70.00
$1,813.94
Total $1,813.94
-2159-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 2
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment G 101-22828 Ed Bridge, Ridgewood Road ESCROW REFUND/CLOSE
Invoice 051402
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 602-49450-224 Street Maint Materials 3/4 MINUS (CL 2)
Invoice 149
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$1,400.00
Total $1,400.00
$369.32
Total $369.32
Refer 51402 BUILDING OFFICIALS INTERNATIO 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42400-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 ANNUAL DUES
Invoice 051402 PO 16973
Transaction Date 5/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$85.00
Total $85.00
Refer 51402 BUILDING OFFICIASL NORTHSTAR 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42400-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES $45.00
Invoice 051402 PO 16974
Transaction Date 5/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $45.00
Refer 51402 BUREAU ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIR 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-438 Licenses and Taxes RETAIL DEALER LICENSE $250.00
invoice 051402
-mnsaction Date 5/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $250.00
afer 51402 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHE 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-208 Instructional Supplies REGISTRATION COVERT DRUG $180.00
INVESTIGATION
Invoice 216 PO 17402
Cash Payment E 101-42110-208 Instructional Supplies INTOXILYZER CERTIFICATION BURKE $40.00
Invoice 032702 PO 17388
Cash Payment E 101-42110-208 Instructional Supplies INTOXILYZER CERTIFICATION BRUCKNER $40.00
Invoice 032702 PO 17388
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $260.00
Refer 51402 BUSINARO, GINO 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41500-331 Meeting/Travel REIMBURSE MILEAGE $141.72
Invoice 050602
Transaction Date 5/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $141.72
Refer 51402 CHADWICK AND MERTZ 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 04-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $6,063.00
Invoice 050202
Transaction Date 5/8/2002
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total $6,063.00
Refer 51402 CHAMPION AUTO 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTO SUPPLIES
Invoice D138475
Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTO SUPPLIES
Invoice D132158
Transaction Date 5/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
fer 51402 CLASSIFIEDS, ROUNDUP, LAKER, 5/14/2002
~ash Payment E 101-45200-351 Legal Notices Publishing 04-06-02 EE AD
Invoice 051402
$52.14
$16.16
Total $68.30
$69.75
-2160-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 3
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-351 Legal Notices Publishing 04-13-02 EE AD $69.75
Invoice 051402
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $139.50
Refer 51402 COPPIN, LANCE 5/14/2002
Cash Payment G 101-22831 2300 Chateau, L. Coppin ESCROW REFUND/CLOSE $856.00
invoice 051402
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $856.00
Refer 51402 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 04-02 COPIER MAINTENANCE $320.00
Invoice 22858
Transaction Date 5/7/2002
Refer 51402 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 174460
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 176117
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 175285
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
voice 175291
, ransaction Date 5/9/2002
Refer 51402 DIXCO ENGRAVING
Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 034665
Transaction Date 5/8/2002
Refer 51402 DOBOSZENSKI AND SONS, INCOR
Cash Payment E 455-46384-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice REQUEST #1
Transaction Date 5/7/2002
Refer 51402 DOSSETT, SINDI
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
5/14/2002
BEER
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
NAMEPLATES
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
MOUNDS VISION 2ND ADDITION
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-49840-300 Professional Srvs 04-23-02 HRA MEETING VIDEO
Invoice 042302
Transaction Date 5/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 E-Z RECYCLING 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic 04-02 CURBSIDE RECYCLING
Invoice 3664
Transaction Date 4/25/2002
EAST SIDE"BEVERAGE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
BEER
BEER
BEER
BEER
Refer 51402
Cash Payment
Invoice 233147
Cash Payment
Invoice 231374
Sh Payment
.. ~voice 236118
Cash Payment
Invoice 238380
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
$320.00
$772.75
$1,333.90
$1,935.51
$69.10
$4,111.26
$12.25
$12.25
$202,781.21
$202,781.21
$20.00
$20.00
$7,700.00
$7,700.00
$107.00
$9,023.35
$78.00
$85O.00
-2161 -
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 4
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $29.40
Invoice 234742
Cash Payment
Invoice 235274
Cash Payment
Invoice 234741
Cash Payment
Invoice 237849
Cash Payment
Invoice 237850
Transaction Date 5/1/2002
Refer 2788 ENVIRONMENTAL LANDFORMS, I
Cash Payment
Invoice 1829
Cash Payment
Invoice 1829
Cash Payment
Invoice 1829
Cash Payment
Invoice 1828
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2O02
E 101-43100-223 Building Repair Supplies INSPECT IRRIGATION SYSTEM
E 601-49400-223 Building Repair Supplies INSPECT IRRIGATION SYSTEM
E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies INSPECT IRRIGATION SYSTEM
E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings INSPECT IRRIGATION SYSTEM
~nsaction Date 5/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer
51402 EQUIPMENTSUPPLY, INCORPOR 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings REPAIR BASEMENT UNIT
Invoice 182902
Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings
Invoice S344/0419
Transaction Date 5/1/2002
Refer 51402 ESS (ELECTION EQUIPMENT)
BELTS
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
MANHOLE W/SANITARY COVER
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice EE1269 PO 17302
Transaction Date 4/29/2002
Refer 51402 EXEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL, INC
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
10100
Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 04-05-02 DRUG TEST
Invoice 699623
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
Refer 51402 EXTREME BEVERAGE 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 54881
Transaction Date 5/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
Refer 51402 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone 04-02 472-0635
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone 04-02 472-0635
~oice 043002
Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone 04-02 472-0635
Invoice 043002
10100
$120.75
$815.85
$1,699.9O
$32.50
Total $12,756.75
$24.21
$24.21
$24.20
$140.08
Total $212.70
$907.29
$10.42
Total $917.71
$169.34
Total $169.34
$38.00
Total $38.00
$32.00
Total $32.00
$339.56
$339.56
$339.55
-2162-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 5
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone 04-02 472-0600
$946.96
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone 02-08-02 FINAL 472-1251 $102,19
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone 02-08-02 FINAL 472-1251 $102.19
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone 02-08-02 FINAL472-1251 $102.19
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone 02-08-02 FINAL 472-3711 $512.85
Invoice 043002
Transaction Date 5/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,785.05
Refer 51402 G & K SERVICES 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-16-02 UNIFORMS $29.59
Invoice 183105
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-16-02 UNIFORMS $29.59
Invoice 183105
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-16-02 UNIFORMS $29,59
Invoice 183105
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 04-16-02 MATS $17,12
Invoice 183105
~sh Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 04-16-02 MATS $17.12
,~lvoice 183105
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 04-17-02 MATS $17.12
Invoice 183105
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-23-02 UNIFORMS $29.59
Invoice 189981
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-23-02 UNIFORMS $29.59
Invoice 189981
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-23-02 UNIFORMS $29.59
invoice 189981
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 04-23-02 MATS $25.46
Invoice 189981
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 04-23-02 MATS $25.46
Invoice 189981
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 04-23-02 MATS $25.46
Invoice 189981
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-30-02 UNIFORMS $30.71
Invoice 196964
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-30-02 UNIFORMS $30.71
Invoice 196964
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-30-02 UNIFORMS $30.70
Invoice 196964
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 04-30-02 MATS $15.10
invoice 196964
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 04-30-02 MATS $15.10
",voice 196964
~sh Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 04-30-02 MATS $15.10
Invoice 196964
Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 04-30-02 MATS $42.01
Invoice 196967
-2163-
CITY 0P MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 6
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 04-30-02 MATS $51.48
Invoice 196965
Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 196966
Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 196968
Transaction Date 4/30/2002
Refer 51402 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE
Cash Payment
Invoice 55167
Cash Payment
Invoice 55767
Transaction Date 5/7/2002
Refer 51402 GLENWOoDiNGLEwooD
Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 043002-A
Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous
Invoice 043002-A
Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies
'qvoice 043002-B
~sh Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 043002-C
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 043002-C
Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 043002-C
Transaction Date 5/3/2002
Refer 51402 GRAND, DEB
Cash Payment E 609-49750-331 Meeting/Travel
Invoice 051402
Transaction Date 5/9/2002
Refer 51402 GRIGGS COOPERAND cOMPANy 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 533519
Cash Payment
Invoice 533518
Cash Payment
Invoice 530379
Cash Payment
Invoice 530433
Cash Payment
Invoice 536850
Cash Payment
Invoice 536776
sh Payment
587217
Transaction Date
04-30-02 MATS
04-30-02 MATS
Marquette Bank MoM 10100
5/14/2002
E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTO REPAIR
E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTO REPAIR
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
5/1/2002
Marquette Bank MoM
5/14/2002
WATER 04-02 #5158500
WATER 04-02 #5158500
WATER 04-02 #5158501
WATER 04-02 #5158502
WATER 04-02 #5158502
WATER 04-02 #5158502
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
REIMBURSE MILEAGE
Marquette. Bank Mou 10100
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
WINE
CREDIT--WINE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
$101.53
$23.61
10100
Total $661.33
$79.41
$64.70
Total $144.11
$38.76
$38.76
$46.36
$25.65
$25.65
$25.64
Total $200.82
$127.02
Total $127.02
$298.43
$1,529.84
$431.15
$366.80
$1,153.27
$1,016.24
-$68.50
Total $4,727.23
Refer 51402 HANSON, KANDIS
5/14/20O2
-2164-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 7
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone
Invoice 042202
Cash Payment E 101-41310-331 Meeting/Travel
Invoice 042202
Transaction Date 4/24/2002
Refer 51402 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals
Invoice 45223-B
Transaction Date 4/30/2002
Refer 51402 HENNEPiN COUNTYPu~L'~C WOR
Cash Payment E 601-49400-455 Permits
Invoice UTIL0000242
Transaction Date 5/7/2002
Refer 51402 HENNEPIN COUNTySHERIFF,s'A
Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners
Invoice 042202
Transaction Date 5/7/2002
Refer 51402 HENNEPIN'COUNTM TREASUI~"(R
~ash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners
voice 000488
Transaction Date 5/7/2002
Refer 51402 HENTGES, S.'M. A~'D SONs, INCO
REIMBURSE DSL LINE $49.95
REIMBURSE MILEAGE $31.39
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $81.34
5/14/2002
HYDROFLUSOLIClC ACID $900.00
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/20O2
1ST QTR 2002 UTILITY PERMITS
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
01-02 BOOKING FEE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
03-02 ROOM AND BOARD
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs WESTEDGE WATERMAIN
Invoice REQUEST #1
Transaction Date 5/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 HOLIDAY INN SOUTH 5/14/2002
Total $900.00
$100.00
Total
Total $100.00
$466.02
Total $466.02
$127.00
Total $127.00
$57,911.67
Total $57,911.67
Cash Payment
Invoice 050102 PO 17406
Transaction Date 5/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 51402 HUFNAGLE, TIMOTHY/MELISSA 5/14/2002
Cash Payment G 101-22859 4707 Manchester, 00-36, Huf ESCROW REFUND/CLOSE
Invoice 101-22859
Transaction Date 4/24/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 51402 HUNTER, DEAN 5/14/2002
Cash Payment G 101-22826 D. Hunter-Martin Homes 12- ESCROW REFUND/CLOSE
Invoice 051402
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
efer 51402 IKON OFFICE MACHINES 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-202 Duplicating and copying 04-24-02 THRU 05-24-02 MAINTENANCE
Invoice 23186888
Transaction Date 4/30/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
,fer 51402 I~E" 7,NTERNET ' RV, CE i',NCO ...............................
.ash Payment E 101-41910-300 Professional Srvs 03-02 INTERNED SERVICE
Invoice 10981
Transaction Date 4/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
E 101-42110-208 Instructional Supplies PLEAA CONFERENCE JUNE 19-20, 2002
$136.40
$136.40
$577.20
$577.20
$16,832.92
$16,832.92
$125.17
$125.17
$29.95
$29.95
-2165-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 8
Current Period: May 2002
Refer 51402 ISLANDPARKSKELLY 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $25.86
Invoice 10168
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIE CHANGE $25.86
Invoice 10210
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $25.86
Invoice 10319
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TIRE REPAIR $15.00
Invoice 10337
Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TOWING WATER MAIN BREAK $47.25
Invoice 10179
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BATTERY $75.52
Invoice 10193
Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery THRUST ALIGN $60.95
Invoice 10214
Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $51.17
Invoice 10226
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $9.15
Invoice 10227-A
Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OiL CHANGE $9.15
"~voice 10227-B
~.sh Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $9,15
Invoice 10227-C
Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BREAK REPAIR $63.00
Invoice 10261
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TRANS COVER, ETC. $827.80
Invoice 10323
Cash Payment E 101-42400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SEAT RAIL ASSY, ETC $242.45
Invoice 10345
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
Transaction Date 5/7/2002
Refer 51402 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
Invoice 1395604
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 1395603
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 1395602
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
Invoice 1395601
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 1395600
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
Invoice 190679
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 1392657
'~sh Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
voice 1392656
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 1392655
WINE
LIQUOR
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
CREDIT--WINE
LIQUOR
WINE
LIQUOR
Total
$1,488.17
$67.9O
$86.49
$64.2O
$62.25
$928.20
-$6.90
$1,314.30
$814.25
$56.25
-2166-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 9
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $903.60
Invoice 1398844
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,437.70
Invoice 1398845
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $482.41
Invoice 1398846
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $115.80
Invoice 1398847
Transaction Date 5/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $6,326.45
Refer 51402 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 02-15-02 SIGN CLAIM DEDUCTIBLE $1,000.00
Invoice 051402
Transaction Date 5/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,000.00
Refer 51402 LEMMERMAN, JEFF 5/14/2002
Cash Payment G 101-22844 1642 Heron Lane, Lemmerm ESCROW REFUND/CLOSE $9,179.00
Invoice 051402
Transaction Date 4/25/2002
Refer 51402 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
voice 403348
,.;ash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 385323-A
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 392338oA
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 394328-A
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 405805
Cash Payment
Invoice 408872
Cash Payment
Invoice 408873
Transaction Date
Refer 51402
Cash Payment
Invoice 10768
Cash Payment
Invoice 10791
Cash Payment
Invoice 10805
Cash Payment
Invoice 10828
Cash Payment
Invoice 10840
~sh Payment
,nvoice 10863
Cash Payment
Invoice 10875
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
5/1/2002
MARLIN°S TRUCKING DELIVERY
E 609-49750-265 Freight
E 609-49750-265 Freight
E 609-49750-265 Freight
E 609-49750-265 Freight
E 609-49750-265 Freight
E 609-49750-265 Freight
E 609-49750-265 Freight
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2O02
BEER
BEER
BEER
BEER
BEER
BEER
LIQUOR
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
04-01-02 DELIVERY CHARGE
04-04-02 DELIVERY CHARGE
04-08-02 DELIVERY CHARGE
04-11-02 DELIVERY CHARGE
04-15-02 DELIVERY CHARGE
04-16-02 DELIVERY CHARGE
04-22-02 DELIVERY CHARGE
Total
Total
$9,179.00
$2,273.17
$0.80
$22.40
-$1.20
$3,950.71
$1,676.15
$97.50
$8,019.53
$20.00
$137.60
$12.00
$85.60
$24.80
$86.40
$12.80
-2167-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 10
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E.609-49750-265 Freight 04-25-02 DELIVERY CHARGE
Invoice 10896
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 04-29-02 DELIVERY CHARGE
Invoice 10910
Transaction Date 5/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEM 5/14/2002
$156.00
Cash Payment E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training 04-18-02 LUNCHEON
Invoice 387
Transaction Date 4/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 MILLER, VIRGINIA 5/14/2002
Cash Payment G 101-22833 5020/5024 Edgewater, Miller ESCROW REFUND/CLOSE
Invoice 101-22833
Transaction Date 5/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402' MiNI~IE'S'OTA CITY~couNTY MA'NA 5/14/2000
Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions 05-02 THRU 04-02 MEMBERSHIP
Invoice 051402
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 MINNESOTA EXTERIORS, INCORP 5/14/2002
~ash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow SIDING DEPOT
voice 0047849-1N PO 16448
Transaction Date 5/6/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 MINNE~OTM "FIRE A"G'ENoiES PUR " 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 DUES
Invoice 042202
Transaction Date 4/30/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-470 Water Samples COLIFORM, MF - WATER
Invoice 117386
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 MOUND FIRE RELIEFASSOClATIO 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 895-49990-124 Fire Pension Contributio 05-02 FIRE RELIEF
Invoice 051402
Transaction Date
Refer 51402
Cash Payment
Invoice 608061
Cash Payment
Invoice 508122
Cash Payment
Invoice 57162
Cash Payment
Invoice 57224
Sh Payment
· ,voice 58500
Cash Payment
Invoice 58501
5/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS 5/14/2002
E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials UPM COLD PATCH
E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials
E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials
E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials
E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
UPM COLD PATCH
04-04-02 UPM COLD P
04-05-02 UPM COLD P
04-17-02 BLACKTOP
04-26-02 CONCRETE
$17.60
Total $552.80
$1B.00
Total $16.00
$696.70
Total $696.70
$80.00
Total $80.00
Total
$14,767.00
$14,767.00
$35.00
Total $35.00
$72.50
Total $72.50
Total
$9,088.33
$9,088.33
$427.20
$568.75
$427.20
$568.75
$627.64
$355.66
-2168-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 11
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 04-29-02 CONCRETE $139.56
Invoice 58611
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials CREDIT--CONCRETE
Invoice 57162
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 MULTICARE ASSOCIATESI ~k, fC 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42400-440 Other Contractual Servic EE EXAM SIMONEAU
Invoice 20-17529567
Transaction Date 5/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
,e MU RA , ..............
fer 51402 R WILLIAM 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE MEETING EXPENSE
Invoice 051402 PO 17400
Transaction Date 4/25/2002
Refer 51402 NATIONA;'FIRE P~TECTIoN A$
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
invoice 0996940
Transaction Date 4/30/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer. 51402 NEWMAN SIGNS 5/14/2002
-'ash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials SIGNS
~voice TI-0085008
Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies SIGNS
Invoice TI-0085605
Transaction Date 4/29/2002
Refer 51402
Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone
-$0.10
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
?h Payment
,nvoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (P/W) __
E 602-49450-321 Telephone
E 602-49450-321 Telephone
E 101-43100-321 Telephone
E 101-43100-321 Telephone
E 101-43100-321 Telephone
E 601-49400-321 Telephone
E 101-43100-321 Telephone
E 601-49400-321 Telephone
E 602-49450-321 Telephone
Total $3,114.66
$57.00
Total $57.00
$100.57
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $100.57
5/14/2002
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SAFETY $26.75
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
03-19-02 THRU 04-18-02 #16 JOHNSON, TIM
03-19-02 THRU 04-18-02 #17 POUNDER,
CHRIS
03-19-02 THRU 04-18-02 #18 HARDINA,
DAMON
03-19-02 THRU 04-18-02 #19 KIVISTO, SCOTT
03-19-02 THRU 04-18-02 ~20 GRADY, DAN
03-19-02 THRU 04-18-02 #21 HEITZ, FRANK
03-19-02 THRU 04-18-02 #22 HEITZ, DON
03-19-02 THRU 04-18-02 #23 KESTNER, AL
612-221-6812, #07 SKINNER, GREG
612-221-6811, #07 SKINNER, GREG
812-221-6811, ~:)7 SKINNER, GREG
Total $26.75
$11,74
$77.57
Total $89.31
$39.55
$39.55
$39.55
$39.55
$39.55
$39.55
$39.55
$39.55
$24.86
$24.86
$24.86
-2169-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 12
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
~-ash Payment
voice 051402
Transaction Date
Refer 51402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
~sh Payment
oice 051402
Cash Payment
Invoice 051402
E 281-45210-321 Telephone
E 101-41310-321 Telephone
E 101-43100-321 Telephone
E 601-49400-321 Telephone
E 602-49450-321 Telephone
E 101-45200-321 Telephone
E 601-49400-321 Telephone
E 101-42400-321 Telephone
E 101-42400-321 Telephone
E 601-49400-321 Telephone
4/26/2002
NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl
E 101-42110-321 Telephone
E 101-42110-321 Telephone
E 101-42110-321 Telephone
E 101-42110-321 Telephone
E 101-42110-321 Telephone
E 101-42110-321 Telephone
E 101-42110-321 Telephone
E 101-42110-321 Telephone
E 101-42110-321 Telephone
E 101-42110-321 Telephone
E 101-42110-321 Telephone
612-221-6812, #15 FACKLER, JIM
612-221-6813, #16 HOFF, KATIE
612-221-6814, #03 RAHN, JODI
612-221-6822 #02 NELSON, JOYCE
612-221-6822 #02 NELSON, JOYCE
612-221-6822 #02 NELSON, JOYCE
612-221-8385 #13 SWARTZER, BRIAN
612-282-1182 #14 GEISE, LEE
612-282-5889 #15 SUTHERLAND, JON
612-36305883 NORLANDER, JILL
ANDERSON, MIKE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
5/14/2002
03-18-02 THRU 04-18-02 292-6400 OFFICE
03-18-02 THRU 04-18-02 292-6401 CHIEF
03-18-02 THRU 04-18-02 292-6402 SERGEANT
03-18-02 THRU 04-18-02 292-6402 SRO
03-18-02 THRU 04-18-02 292-6404
INVESTIGATORS
03-18-02 THRU 04-18-02 292-6405 SQUAD
#840
03-18-02 THRU 04-18-02 292-6406 SQUAD
#842
03-18-02 THRU 04-18-02 292-6407 DARE
03-18-02 THRU 04-18-02 292-6408 SQUAD
#844
03-18-02 THRU 04-18-02 292-6409 SQUAD
#845
03-18-02 THRU 04-18-02 292-6410 CSO
$77.97
$47.66
$35.58
$13.18
$13.18
$13.18
$39.55
$39.55
$10.20
$33.89
$35.99
$750.91
$39.60
$41.50
$39.60
$39.60
$118.27
$39.60
$39.60
$39.95
$39.77
$40.93
$39.60
-2170-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 13
Current Period: May 2002
Transaction Date 4/26/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $518.02
Refer 51402 NlCCUM DOCKS, INCORPORATED 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 281-45210-440 Other Contractual Sen/lc INSTALL DOCKS
Invoice 1780
Transaction Date 5/9/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
............................... EQ MEN .....................................
Refer 51402 NORTHERN TOOL AND UIP 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts WATER PUMP
Invoice 823302080
Transaction Date 5/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 51402 NOR ERN WATER WORKS SUPP 5/14/2002
Cash Payment . E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply METER
Invoice 3105931
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply METER
Invoice 3106269
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply 1" METER WITH COUPLINGS
Invoice 3107035 PO 17300
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer II'II514°2 IIoM G Li;" O RAPH, INbORPO/ "" ""5/1"4;2002 ................
~ash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic LAMINATE MAPS ~oice 0042563-1N
Transaction Date 5/7/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 51402 PAINE?BEVERLY 5/14/2002
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND SHARE FEE
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND LMCD FEE
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND LATE FEE
Invoice 051402
Transaction Date 4/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 51402 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 27492093
Transaction Date 5/2/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 51402 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 827482
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 825298
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 825297
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 829920
"~sh Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
/oice 829921
Transaction Date 5/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 51402 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 5/14/2002
$2,375.00
$2,375.00
$596.39
$596.39
$961.62
$90.95
$1,637.54
$2,690.11
$72.42
$72.42
$80.00
$22.50
$25.00
$127.50
$68.75
$68.75
$932.90
$103.00
$78.85
$767.27
$516,00
$2,398.02
-2171 -
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 14
Current Perlod: May 2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $759.84
Invoice 57579
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $677.14
Invoice 58071
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $955.52
Invoice 58657
Transaction Date 5/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,392.50
Refer 51402 PLUNKETT'S, iNCORPORATED 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic APR MAY JUNE 2002 PEST CONTROL $95.84
Invoice 460974
Transaction Date 5/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $95.84
Refer 51402 POUNDER, CHRISTOPHER 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2002 BOOT ALLOWANCE $159.95
Invoice 051402
Transaction Date 4/30/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $159.95
Refer 51402 PROFESSIONAL LAW ENFORCEM 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-208 Instructional Supplies CONFERENCE JUNE 20-21, 2002 $60.00
Invoice 050102 PO 17405
Transaction Date 5/7/2002
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Total $60.00
.~fer 51402 PROTECTION ONE 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 05-01-02 THRU 07-31-02 MONITORING
Invoice 12681094
Cash Payment E
Invoice 12681094
Cash Payment E
Invoice 12681094
Cash Payment E
Invoice 12678348
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 51402 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER, INCORP 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E222-42260-210 Operating Supplies BATTERY
Invoice 6579 IN
Transaction Date 4/30/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
Refer 51402 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 116547-00
Cash Payment E
Invoice 115899-00
Cash Payment E
Invoice 116170-00
Cash Payment E
Invoice 115898-00
Cash Payment E
voice 113750-00
Payment E
Invoice 113357-00
601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 05-01-02 THRU 07-31-02 MONITORING
602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 05-01-02 THRU 07-31-02 MONITORING
609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 05-01-02THRU 10-31-02
609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
$47.60
$47.60
$47.60
$435.77
$578.57
$358.07
$358.07
$3,87O.30
$82.33
$192.00
$1,875.29
$171.48
$3,596.77
-2172-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 15
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $835.73
Invoice 119651-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 119161-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 119162-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 119364-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 116064-00
Transaction Date 5/1/2002
Refer "51402 R.C. ELEcTRIc, INCORPORA TE~
E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies CITYHALL ENTRANCE
Cash Payment
Invoice 042302
Cash Payment
Invoice 042302
$69.74
LIQUOR $1,054.39
LIQUOR $146.95
CREDIT--LIQUOR -$27;36
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $11,867.62
5/14/2002
E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings CITYHALL ENTRANCE
Transaction Date 4/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Cash Payment E 101-41910-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 04-02 GARBAGE SERVICE
"~voice 1660
~nsaction Date 4/2512002
Refer 51402 RIDGEVlEW BUSINESS HEALTH
Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept.
Invoice 040902
Transaction Date 4/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 51402 SCHWAAB, INCo~PoR~'TEo ...... 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies SIGNATURE STAMP
Invoice M02061
Transaction Date 4/30/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Refer 1402 SHADOW PLASTICS, INCORPORA 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos GARBAGE BAGS
Invoice 46473 PO 17243
Transaction Date 5/1/2002
Refer 51402 SHo~EwooD TREE SERVICE "'
Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal
invoice 3932
Transaction Date 5/1/2002
"51402 s lrH, SA" H .........
Cash Payment E 101-42400-331 Meeting/Travel
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment E 101-42400-331 Meeting/Travel
Invoice 051402
~ssh Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
~oice M-39146
Transaction Date 4/29/2002
Refer 51402 SOS PRINTING
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
RESPITATOR USE REVIEW
$157.02
$293.30
Total $450.32
$114.54
Total $114.54
$25.00
Total $25.00
Total
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
5/14/2002
SOUTHVIEW COMMONS REMOVE TREE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
REIMBURSE MILEAGE
REIMBURSE MEALS
BUFFER SIGNS
Total
$66.17
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
$66.17
$1,004.21
$1,004.21
$591.08
$591.08
$44.85
$25.71
$643.26
Total $713.82
-2173-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10102 9:10 AM
Page 16
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E222-42260-350 Printing COPIES $3.09
Invoice 63748
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $43.88
Invoice 63774
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $43,88
Invoice 63774
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $43.88
Invoice 63774
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $43,88
Invoice 63774
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $43.88
Invoice 63774
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $14.63
Invoice 63774
Cash Payment E609-49750-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $14.63
Invoice 63774
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $21.94
Invoice 63774
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $21.96
Invoice 63774
Date 4/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $295.65
. ,efer 51402 ST. JOHN'S CHURCH 5/14/2002
Cash Payment G 101-22832 St. John's Church ESCROW REFUND/CLOSE $357.50
Invoice 051402
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $357.50
Refer 51402 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INCORP 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR TO LOADER
invoice SW37867 PO 17314
Transaction Date 5/7/2002
Refer 51402 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cash Payment
Invoice 7827
Cash Payment
Invoice 7834
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 7746
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 7192
Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous
Invoice 7710
Transaction Date 4/29/2002 Marquette Bank Mou
Refer 51402 STREICHER'S 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPLACE SIRED #644
$1,069.76
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,069.76
6/14/2002
E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 20 AMP POLE
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic SINCLAIR GENERATOR
FIXTURE REPAIR
LIGHT POLE REPAIR
12-14-01 REPAIR LIGHTS
10100
Total
Invoice 289599.1
sh Payment E 101-42115-210 Operating Supplies
, ~voice 286662.2 PO 17393
Transaction Date 4/29/2002
BATON
Marquette Bank Mou
5/14/2002
Refer 51402 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
$204.52
$72.00
$330.00
$289.68
$131.77
$1,027.97
$216.65
$418.23
10100 Total $634.88
-2174-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 17
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER -$8.95
Invoice 259177
Cash Payment BEER $11,664.00
Invoice 259178
Cash Payment BEER $39.00
Invoice 218548
Cash Payment BEER -$8.70
Invoice 259177
Cash Payment BEER $3,481.20
Invoice 260629
Cash Payment BEER $63.70
Invoice 260628
Cash Payment BEER $12.85
Invoice 259897
Cash Payment BEER $1,998.55
Invoice 259898
Cash Payment BEER $188.00
Invoice 221380
Cash Payment BEER $256.60
Invoice 259179
-'ansaction Date 5/1/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $17,686.25
......... ' '' ' KRUp~ TOR'cOR ........................................
,efer 51402 THYSSEN- ELEVA 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic 05-02 ELEVATOR SERVICE $158.60
Invoice 267656
Transaction Date 5/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $158.60
$176.75
Total $176.75
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Refer 51402 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 13399
Transaction Date 5/9/2002
Refer 51402 TRI-STA TE PUMP AND CONTOL, I
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 21007 PO 17297
Transaction Date 4/29/2002
TRUE VALUE, MOUND
E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies
E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies
5/14/2002
REGISTER PAPER ROLLS
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
CHECK VALVE
$1,214.05
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,214.05
5/14/2002
Refer 51402
Cash Payment
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment
invoice 043002
Cash Payment
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment
Invoice 043002
sh Payment
,,voice 043002
Cash Payment
Invoice 043002
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES
$256.63
$388.33
$142.84
$15.70
$82.59
$2.76
$102.92
-2175-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 18
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $114.95
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $24.70
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $12.02
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment E 281-45210-210 Operating Supplies MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $27.24
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $54.08
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $54.08
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $54.07
Invoice 043002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $189.82
Invoice 043002
Transaction Date 5/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,522.73
Refer 51402 TRUE VALUE"'NA'VAARRE 5/14/2002
COUPLING, ETC $12.75
COUPLING, ETC $7.43
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
Cash Payment
Invoice 099122
tsh Payment
.~voice 099559
Transaction Date
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
5/7/2002
Total $20,18
Refer 51402 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY
Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 341759-0 PO 17368
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 341408-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 231308-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 341408-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 341408-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 341408-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 341408-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 341408-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 341408-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 341408-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
~oice 341408-0
aSh Payment E 101-41410-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 341244-0
5/14/2002
COPY PAPER
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
TONER
FILE BOX
$167.02
$24.22
$24.22
$24.22
$24.22
$24.22
$8.O7
$8.07
$12.11
$12.10
$190.64
$14.73
-2176-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 19
Current Period.' May 2002
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.27
Invoice 341775-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.27
Invoice 341775-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.27
Invoice 341175-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.27
Invoice 341775-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.27
Invoice 341775-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.76
Invoice 341775-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0,76
Invoice 341775-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.13
Invoice 341775-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.10
Invoice 341775-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies CARTRIDGE $21,26
Invoice 341775-0
~ash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $19.40
~voice 342793-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $19,40
Invoice 342793-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $19.40
Invoice 342793-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $19.40
Invoice 342793-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $19.40
Invoice 342793-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $6.47
Invoice 342793-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $6.47
Invoice 342793-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.70
Invoice 342793-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.68
Invoice 342793-0
CaSh Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies BINDERS,CLIPS,ETC $32.24
Invoice 342039-0 PO 17367
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies BATI'ERIES,ETC $115.62
Invoice 34329809 PO 17404
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies JACKETS,MOUSE, ETC $48.23
Invoice 342300-0 PO 17401
Transaction Date 4/30/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $895.61
~fer 51402 UNIFORMS LIMITED 5/14/2002
~h Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies DRESS COAT $417.70
Invoice 121458
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies SILVER BAR $37.69
Invoice 122744
-2177-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Page 20
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E 101-42115-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING $122.55
Invoice 120957
Transaction Date 4/30/2002
Refer 51402 US FILTER
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 8296347 PO 17308
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 9324954
Transaction Date 4/29/2002
Refer 51402 VIRTUAL PHONE, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone
Invoice 12278
Transaction Date 5/7/2002
Refer 51402 WALLIS, LEO
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits
Invoice 051402
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits
invoice 051402
Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees
voice 051402
ransaction Date 4/29/2002
Refer 51402 WESTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow
Invoice 050502
Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow
invoice 050502
Transaction Date 5/9/2002
Refer .5~'~,02'" WIDMER, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment
Invoice 5259
Cash Payment
Invoice 5260
Cash Payment
Invoice 5261
Cash Payment
Invoice 5262
Cash Payment
Invoice 5263
Cash Payment
Invoice 5264
Cash Payment
Invoice 5265
Cash Payment
O'~voice 5269
,,~n~c, tion Dat~ .... 4/29/2002
Refer 51402 WINKLER, BOB
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $577.94
5/14/2002
REPAIR CLAMPS $1,111.23
SLEEVE, BOLT, ETC $395.92
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,507.15
5/14/2002
BATTERY CELL PHONE $62.74
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
5/14/2002
REFUND DOCK FEE
REFUND SHARE FEE
REFUND LMCD FEE
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
5/14/2002
PARK SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM
MUSIC PARKS FEES
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
5/14/2002
E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-12-02 REPLACE HYDRANT
E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-22-02 FORCE MAIN BARTLETT
E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-14-02 REPAIRED CURB STOP
E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-01-02 REPAIR FORCE MAIN
E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-21-02 WATERMAIN AT THREE POINTS
E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic 03-05-02 CLEAN OUT DITCHES
E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-13-02 REPLACE HYDRANT AND VALVE
E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-18-02 REPAIR FORCE MAIN BREAK
Marquette Bank Mou 10100
5/14/2002
Total
$62.74
$250.00
$80.00
$15.00
$345.OO
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$435.00
$1,025.00
$1,657.50
$1,025.00
$1,332.50
$2,811.00
$1,015.00
$380.00
$9,681.00
-2178-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/10/02 9:10 AM
Page 21
Current Period: May 2002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material SAND FOR BEACHES $573.54
Invoice 042902
Transaction Date 5/8/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $573.54
Refer 51402 XCEL ENERGY 5/14/2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIRS FAIRFIELD/MEADOW, PLOWING $208.40
Invoice C30530
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities #0542-505-000-274 $4,814.74
Invoice 053102
Transaction Date 4/29/2002
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
455 TIF 1-2
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
670 RECYCLING FUND
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
895 FIRE RELIEF FUND
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5,023.14
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$78,883.81
$1,532.33
$2,922.40
$202,781.21
$72,112.11
$6,849.83
$78,157.99
$7,700.00
$2,811.00
$9,088.33
$462,839.01
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$462,839.01
$462,839.01
-2179-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
TO:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
BONNIE RITTER
SUBJECT: AMERICAN LEGION PARADE-JUNE 8, 2002
ANNUAL CONVENTION
DATE: May 10, 2002
Hennepin County and the Mound Police Department have denied the request from the
American Legion for a parade to run South on 110, to CSAH 15, and West to Cypress
Lane.
The Legion has re-applied for a different route; to start on Maywood at Shirley Hills,
South on Fairview Lane, to Bartlett Blvd, West to Wilshire and back to Maywood.
Approval is contingent upon Police Department approval.
printed on recycled paper
-2180-
CITY .OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
PARADE PERMIT
NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF TH~ CITY PARKS~ BUH,~GS OR
Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a d~sk to insure cleaning up of the parade
Area to be Used (Streets to be used as Parade r%tte, Parade Line-up Area, ,etc. - include map if
//-- t
Ti~ Frame ~'5": ~ ~'~ ~: _~o ¢~ ~7 ~zS<'~ vu. ~r'~
Expected Attendance
Organization .,G ~.~~Lz) /- ~, ~ ~
Representative's Name ~, /o.~L"i-'
Address /~'
Telephone No. Home:
Drivers Lice.. Number ~' -
Work:
-2181 -
Engineering · Planning o Surveying
May 7, 2002
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
Improvement Project 2002
Mound Visions 2nd Addition Partial Payment
MFRA #13646
Dear Kandis:
Enclosed is Doboszenski & Sons' Payment Request No. 1 for work completed through May 3,
2002 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $202,781.21. Also included
with the Payment Request is Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $4,807.50 for an increase in
size of the forcemain structures and polyethylene encasement of the forcemain.
We have reviewed this Payment Request and Change Order, find them in order, and recommend
payment in the above amount to the Contractor.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
MFRA
John Cameron, City Engineer
JC:rth
cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director
Enclosure
s:Xmain:'maou 13646~specs\part-pay5 -7
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-mai/: mfra@mfra, com
-2182-
Z
U.I
0
I.-
Z
LU
I--
Z
vzz
0
UJ
I
~
b< ~ ~ : ~
o ~ ~ ~
'-2183-
-2184-
Z
l--
Itl
o ~
Ouz~ ,',i
~oo~ooooo~ oo~oo oo
0
-2185-
I
n-
~.U
"r'
-2186-
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
City of Mound
Improvement Project 2002
Mound Visions 2nd Addition
~'#13~46 ..... ~
Increase size of forcemain structures
Poly Wrap on Forcemain
3 EA at $1,450fEA
610 LF at $0.75/LF
(ADD) $ 4,350.00
(ADD) $ 457.50
TOTAL TI-IlS CHANGE ORDER
ADD $ 4,807.50
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT
$ 296,146.25
$ 4,807.50
$ 300,953.75
APPROVED:
CITY OF MOUND
BY:
DATE:
ACCEPTED:
DOBOSZENSKI & SONS, INC.
RECOMM]ENDED:
MFRA
s:Xmain:~noul 3646~spee¢chgorder-no 1
-2187-
· ' .... FR A
Engineering · Planning · Surveying
May 7, 2002
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
West Edge Boulevard
Watermain Improvements Partial Payment
MFRA #07953
Dear Kandis:
Enclosed is S.M. Hentges & Sons' Payment Request No. 1 for work completed through
May 3, 2002 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $57,911.67.
We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above
amount to the Contractor.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
MFRA
John Cameron, City Engineer
JC:rth
cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director
Enclosure
s:Xmain:Xmou07953~specs\part-pay5-7
-2188-
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-mai/: mfra@mfra, com
-2189-
~- · ~. ~' ~' · · ~
~88o8oo8~888~
80888888808000
~m
mm
oooooooom~o~
o888o8888~o8oo
o88o8o8oo~o88o
-2190-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
RESOLUTION REESTABLISHING PRECINCT BOUNDARIES AS REQUIRED BY
MINNESOTA STATUTES 204B.14, SUBD. 3 (C)
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota:
Whereas the boundaries of Precincts One through Six, which consists of the.
territory of Mound, Minnesota, remain unchanged following state legislative
redistricting, the City of Mound hereby reestablishes these precincts with those
boundaries as required by Minnesota Statutes 204B14, Subdivision 3 (c).
2. Whereas the polling Places remain at:
Precinct #1
Mt. Olive Church
5218 Bartlett Blvd.
Precinct ~
Seahorse Rec Building
5430 Three Points Blvd.
Precinct #2
Indian Knoll Manor
2020 Commerce Blvd.
Precinct #5
The Depot at Mound Bay Park
5801 Bartlett Blvd.
Precinct #3
Mound City Hall
5341 Maywood Road
Precinct #6
Hennepin County Library
2079 Commerce Blvd.
the City Council hereby reestablishes these locations as the designated polling
places for the stated precincts in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 204B.18.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Councilmember
and seconded by
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this day of
,2002.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
-2191-
5341 Mayxvood Road
Mound, MN 55364
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Community Development Director Sarah Smith
DATE: May 9, 2002
SUBJECT: Variance(s) Application - Parking Lot Improvements
APPLICANT: Brett Anderson
PLANNING CASE NUMBERS: 02-10
LOCATION: 2136 Belmont Lane
ZONING: R-3 Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
SUMMARY
At its May 6, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the variance(s) request from
Brett Anderson to allow expansion of the parking lot located on the west side of the existing 4-
plex located at 2136 Belmont Lane. The project also includes the replacement of a timber
retaining wall with an interlocking block wall system and construction of a 10'x 10' refuse storage
enclosure to be located in the southwest corner.
The primary purpose for the proposed improvements is to correct a long-standing refuse storage
issue as well as to provide additional parking for the multiple-family structure. Specific details
regarding the proposal are contained in iPlanning Report No. 02-10 which has been included as an
attachment. The requested variances are identified as follows:
Required Existing Proposed Variance
Parking lot - front setback
Parking lot - side setback (N)
Parking lot - side setback (S)
Required number of parking stalls
Reduced parking stall size
(20 a) (20 a) (0) (20 ~)
(]0 a) (0) (0) (10 a)
(10 fi) (40 ~) (9.34 fi) (.66 in)
(10) (4) (6) (4)
(t0'x 20') (10'x 14.5') (5.5 ~)
-2192-
OVERVIEW OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Members of the Planning Commission reviewed the application and expressed support for the
project as the site improvements will correct a long-standing refuse storage problem and will also
provide additional parking. Members of the Planning Commission further discussed whether or
not an opportunity exists for the City to offer financial incentives and/or funding assistance when
improvements such as this are undertaken.
A number of suggested revisions were also recommended by the Planning Commission including
relocation of the retaining wall and parking lot further east so that the new facility will meet the
current code requirements. The Planning Commission also supported City staff's position that the
south setback should be increased to ten (10) feet therefore eliminating the need for an additional
variance.
Details regarding the Planning Commission's review of the application are included the May 6,
2002 Planning Commission meeting minute excerpts which have been included as a separate
attachment.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Based on discussions with the applicant, it is City staff's understanding that he is contemplating
whether or not the proposal may be implemented in full and may consider an alternate proposal to
address the refuse storage structure which may eliminate the need for variance(s) and/or a Public
Lands Permit.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously to recommend approval of the
variance request(s) for the property located at 2136 Belmont Lane subject to the following
conditions:
1. The City Council approves a Public Lands Permit to allow excavation activities and the
continued use of the Belmont Lane right-of-way for parking purposes.
2. The setback on south side of the proposed parking area is increased to (10) feet in order
to meet the minimum requirement of the R-3 District.
The applicant procures the necessary permits from the City including, but not limited to, a
building permit, a grading permit and street excavation permit and submits all appropriate
information.
4. The request shall be made subject to all comments from City staff including the City
Engineer and Public Works Director.
5. The retaining wall and parking area is moved further east so that the proposed parking
stall size can be increased to 10'x 20' and therefore will meet City Code.
-2193-
6. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of' all costs associated with the variance
application.
A draft resolution based on the Planning Commission's recommendation has been included as an
attachment.
ATTACHMENTS
· Draft resolution 02-__ based on March 4, 2002 Planning Commission recommendation
· Minutes excerpt from May 6, 2002 Planning Commission meeting
· Planning Report No. 02-10
· Resolution No. 89-97 - 30 foot lakeside setback variance for 4770 Northern Road
· Letter from Travis Germundson of DNR dated March 6, 2002
· Email memo(s) from Mike Wyatt of MCWD dated March 5, 2002
-2194-
RESOLUTION # 02-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND
APPROVING VARIANCES TO ALLOW PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2136 BELMONT LANE
PID# 13-117-24-32-0095
P & Z CASE # 02-10
WHEREAS, the applicant, Brett Anderson, has submitted a variance(s)
application to allow expansion of the existing parking lot located on the west side of the
existing 4-plex structure located at 2136 Belmont Lane; and
WHEREAS, the proposal, as submitted, also includes the replacement of a timber
retaining wall with an interlocking block wall system and construction ora 10' x 10'
refuse storage structure to be located in the southwest corner which will correct a long-
standing refuse storage problem; and
WHEREAS, the requested variances are identified as follows:
Required Existing Proposed Variance
Parking lot - front setback (20 ft) (20 ft) (0) (20 ft)
Parking lot - side setback (N) (10 fi) (0) (0) (10 ft)
Parking lot - side setback (S) (10 ft) (40 ft) (9.34 R) (.66 in)
Required numbei~ of stalls (10) (4) (6) (4)
Reduced parking stall size (10'x 20') (10'x 14.5') (5.5 ft)
WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned R-3 Residentiali and
WHEREAS, multiple family structures are permitted uses in the R-3 District; and
WHEREAS, the existing site is non-conforming due to several conditions
including deficient lot area size and width, side and rear building setbacks, side and front
parking lot setbacks, deficient parking stalls and inadequate parking stall size; and
-2195-
WHEREAS, the proposal will increase the number of parking stalls from four
(4) to six (6) and will bring the property closer into compliance with the City Code; and
WItEREAS, City staff has reviewed the application and recommended approval
of the variance(s) application subject to conditions; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application at May 6,
2002 meeting and has recommended approval of the variance(s) subject to conditions.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of
Mound does hereby approve the variances as requested by the applicant with the
following conditions:
1. The City Council approves a Public Lands Permit to allow excavation activities
and the continued use of the Belmont Lane right-of-way for parking purposes.
2. The setback on south side of the proposed parking area is increased to (10) feet in
order to meet the minimum requirement of the R-3 District.
The applicant procures the necessary permits from the City including, but not
limited to, a building permit, a grading permit and street excavation permit and
submits all appropriate information.
4. The request shall be made subject to all comments from City staff including the
City Engineer and Public Works Director.
5. The retaining wall and parking area is moved further east so that the proposed
parking stall size can be increased to 10'x 20' and therefore will meet City Code.
6. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the
variance application.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby
approve the variances for the following legally described property:
Lots 22 & 23, Block 6, Lakeside Park, A.L. Crockers lst Division, Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
-2196-
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
',, The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Adopted May 14,2002
and
Pat Meisel, Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
-2197-
MINUTES
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 6, 2002
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Michael welcomed the public and called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Those present: Vice Chair Orvin Burma; Commissioners: Jorj Ayaz, Jerry Clapsaddle, Becky
Glister, Cklair Hasse, Michael Mueller, Frank Weiland and Council Liaison Bob Brown. Absent
and excused: GeoffMichael. Staff present: City Planner Loren Gordon, Community
Development Director Sarah Smith and Recording Secretary Jill Norlander. The following
individuals were present: John & Kathy Aquilina - 3030 Island View Drive, Paul Glyrm - 4600
Cumberland Road, Dan Hutchson - 4432 Radnor Road, Greg & Kathy Fall - 3036 Island View
Drive, Helen Ohnesorge - 3066 Island View Drive, Burt Carlson - 4432 Denbigh Road, Brett
Anderson - 5604 Chowen Avenue South.
3. APPROVAL OF APRIL 15, 2002 MEETING MINUTES
MOTION by Weiland, seconded by Clapsaddle, to approve the minutes of the April 15, 2002
Planning Commission meeting.
MOTION carded unanimously.
4. BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE #02-10 Variance - Parking lot improvements
Brett Anderson
2136 Belmont Lane
Anderson is new owner of the four-unit apartment complex and is proposing improvements to
upgrade the parking facilities and garbage containment area. Specifically, he wishes to add 2
parking spaces, bringing it closer to compliance, and a screened garbage storage area. The
proposal does not affect any of the setback issues, however, the parking area is in non-
compliance due to deficient setback area. The following permits will be required: a Public Lands
permit (to allow use of the city-owned portion), a building permit (for the garbage screening
facility), a grading ~ermit and a street excavation permit. The property is zoned multiple family
and the present use is permitted in this district. Lot area is deficient. Parking facilities are
deficient (should be 10 with a portion provided indoors). Parking stalls are deficient in size
(should be 10 x 20'). The current non-conforming issues on this property are not made worse by
this plan. Staff is suggesting hard surface driveway similar to the other apartment buildings in the
area. The building is bordered on all sides by like buildings. All the neighboring properties have
undergone similar improvements. City staff regards the dumpster screening as a positive.
-2198-
Planning Commission Minutes May 6, 2002
Staff recommends that the variance be approved with the following conditions: O~41~
1. The City Council must approve a Public Lands permit.
2. The setback on south side should be increased to 10 feet to meet the R-3 requirement.
3. Applicant must obtain building, grading, street excavation and other permits as necessary.
4. The request shall be made subject to all comments from City staff.
5~ The appli~anti§-r~sp6ii§ibl~f6r'all-fees~associate~d~vith-th~ Van~ceapP-lib~fib-n. - .......................
Weiland thought that the slope should be graded so the retaining wall stays under 4 feet and the
retaining wall be moved closer to the building so parking is further off Belmont. Smith indicated
that staff would like the parking spaces increased to 10' x 17'.
Mueller was very supportive of changes to these properties to improve their appearance. He felt
we should encourage owners to clean these properties up as much as possible and was very
comfortable in granting variances for this purpose because the City of Mound would be better off
in a long mn. '
Brown felt the 6 inch variance on the south side should be moved to 10 feet to eliminate the need
for a variance on that side. Smith concurred.
Glister was in support of this project and, because there is a hardship, it is not setting a precedent
for smaller parking stalls.
Clapsaddle indicated that, if the only reason for the short parking spaces was to line up the
retaining wall with the wall on the property adjacent, it was a very arbitrary reason. Structurally,
the building could handle the narrower greenspace and perhaps we should use this oppommity to
establish a criteria for the other properties to follow in the future.
Discussion
Brett Anderson - 5604 Chowen Avenue South: The increased grading and dirt removal may be
cost prohibitive. Money might be the deciding factor whether he does only the dumpster
enclosure vs. including the parking. The steps are set out into the parking area now and will be
set in.
Mueller observed that there will always be a variance here because of the parking space
deficiency and the north and east setbacks. It is ridiculous to ask for compliance on something
that will still be varianced.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Mueller, to accept the proposal except that the south side
setback be made 10 feet and parking stalls be made 20 feet.
Mueller is in favor of this motion but is concerned that we are not encouraging these property
owners to upgrade. By encouraging improvement of the property we make Mound a better place
to live.
-2199-
Planning Commission Minutes May 6, 2002
DRAFT
Finding of Fact: If there is a way to help the property owner with the cost of this improvement
the City Council is asked to pursue that.
A discussion followed regarding the lack of money as a hardship. It was concluded that it was
covered under State Statute and that, combined with other factors, it could be considered a
hardship.
Mueller suggested an amendment to motion as follows: that the City Council explore other
opportunities to eliminate or reduce permit/engineering costs to help with the property owner's
expenses.
Brown accepts the amendment - but - he can only suggest it, not guarantee the City Council will
go along with it.
MOTION carded unanimously
-2200-
5341 Ma)wood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3~90
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
DATE: May 1, 2002
SUBJECT: Variance(s) Request
OWNER/APPLICANT: Brett Anderson
PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 02-10
LOCATION: 2136 Belmont Lane
ZONING: R-3 Multiple Family Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
BACKGROUND
The applicant, Brett Anderson, purchased the property located at 2136 Belmont Lane in 2001 and
has submitted a variance(s) application to allow expansion of the parking lot located on the west
side of the existing 4-plex. The project also includes the replacement ora timber retaining wall
with an interlocking block wall system and construction of a 10'x 10' refuse storage enclosure to
be located in the southwest comer. The primary purpose for the proposed improvements is to
correct a long-standing refuse storage issue as well as to provide additional parking for the
multiple-family structure. The requested variance(s) are identified below:
Required Existing Proposed Variance
Parking lot - front setback
Parking lot - side setback (Iq)
Parking lot - side setback (S)
Required number of parking stalls
Reduced parking stall size
(20 It) (20 a) (0) (20 e)
(10 it) (0) (0) (10 ft)
(10 it) (40 It) (9.34 It) (.66 in)
(10) (4) (6) (4)
(10'x 20')(lO'x 14.5') (5.5 it)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lots 22 & 23, Block 6, Lakeside Park, A.L. Crockers 1st Division, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
-2201 -
that the proposed project also requires the approval of a number of other City permits which
include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Public Lands Permit (NOTE: Requires City Council approval for excavation and
placement of structure on right-of-way)
Building Permit
Grading Permit
Street Excavation Permit
ISSUES ANALYSIS
Zoning. The subject site is zoned R-3 Multiple Family Residential. Multiple family structures
(3-6 units) are a permitted use in the R-3 District. The minimum lot requirements of the R-3
District are set forth in City Code Chapter 350:635 Subd. 5.
Site Conditions. The subject property includes an existing multiple-family structure which
includes four (4) rental units. The existing parking lot is located on the west side of the property
and currently extends on to the Belmont Lane right-of-way and accommodates approximately
four (4) cars. The proposal, as submitted, will allow for an additional two (2) stalls to be parked
on the subject site.
Non-Conforming Structures/Uses. There are a number of non-conforming conditions
associated with the subject property including deficient lot size / width and deficient side and
rear yard setbacks for the existing 4-plex building. The proposal does not affect these issues.
The site is also deficient adequate parking according to City Code Section 350:635.5 (D) as there
are only (4) designated stalls on the subject property. The proposal, as submitted, will increase
the number of parking stalls to six (6) if approved and will bring the property closer to
compliance with the current parking regulations of the R-3 District which requires a minimum of
(10) parking stalls.
City Code Chapter 350:420, Subd. 9 regulates non-conforming buildings in the City of Mound
and states that non-conforming principal and accessory structures may be expanded, enlarged or
modified or conforming structures can be added provided that the expansion, enlargement, or
modification meets the current zoning regulations and no other non-conformities are created.
Variances Required. The applicant, is requesting variance(s) approval to exPand the existing
parking area which is currently non-conforming due to deficient setbacks in order to expand the
existing parking lot. Variance(s) to address the parking stall shortage and to allow a reduced
parking stall size are also necessary.
-2202-
Required Parking Stalls. City Code Chapter 350:635, Subd. 5 (D) 1 requires 2 ½ parking
spaces per unit (1) of which must be indoors and 1 ½ which may be outdoor parking. Therefore,
a total of (10) parking spaces are required. There are currently approximately (4) stalls located
oh-ttie- S-ubj~t- ~i~ -Th¥is~-op6SalYVilI pr6x~ide'~/n'~/dditi0fi/il-'(2ystaii-S"~f6i~a~dtal
a parking stall shortage exists. No indoor parking is provided on the site.
Parking Stall Size. City Code Chapter 350:635, Subd. 5 (D) (3) requires that all outdoor
parking stalls shall be a minimum size of 10'x 20'. The existing and proposed stalls are
approximately 10' x 14.5' therefore a variance is necessary.
Parking Lot Surface. City Code Chapter 350:635, Subd. 5 (D) (5) requires that all interior
parking areas shall be of blacktop or concrete construction. The surface of the proposed parking
facility is gravel-based. The City Engineer has recommended that the parking area(s) be paved.
Parking / Driveway / Refuse Storage Coverage Requirements. As set forth in Chapter
350:635, Subd. 5, (C) (3), (40) percent of the area may be used for parking, driveways, garages,
refuse areas, storage areas, and other permitted uses. The parking/driveway coverage on the
subject site is approximately (13) percent and therefore meets the current requirements.
Green / Landscaping Coverage Requirements. As set forth in City Code Chapter 350:635,
Subd. 5, (C) (2), a minimum of(30) percent of the lot area shall be green and/or landscaped. The
greenspace on the subject site is approximately (65) percent and therefore meets the current
requirements.
Hardcover. Hardcover on the subject site cannot exceed (40) percent. Please refer to the
hardcover calculation sheet which has been included as a separate attachment.
CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Copies of the request
departments for review
summarized below:
and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City
and comment. All written comments received to date have been
City Engineer John Cameron
Public Works Director Skinner
See memorandum which has been included as a
separate attachment.
It appears the water shutoff valve may be located
in the parking area. If possible, the water shutoff
valve should be moved to an alternate location
acceptable to City staff and included on a revised
as-built survey. It is also recommended that the
depth of the parking area be increased an additional
2-3 feet in order to minimize encroachment.
-2203-
DISCUSSION POINTS
four (4) multiple family structures which front Belmont Lane and four (4) buildings
which front Basswood Lane.
2. It appears that similar site improvements have been undertaken on neighboring properties
in recent years.
3. The opportunity to properly store and screen the refuse dumpster is viewed as positive
and will also bring the property into compliance with the City Code requirements.
While the parking stalls are deficient in size according to the City Code, they are
probably close to the standard parking stall size as a portion of the right-of-way along
Belmont Lane is being used for parking purposes.
5. Retaining walls have historically not been subject to setback requirements as they are
deemed to be allowable landscaping encroachments.
6. Retaining walls which exceed four (4) feet in height require the issuance of a building
permit as well as the submittal of specifications signed by a Professional Engineer.
The proposal, as submitted, will correct a long-standing refuse storage issue which pre-
dates the current owner and will also provide additional parking to accommodate the
tenants of existing 4-unit structure. Additionally, the proposed improvements will also
visually enhance the subject site.
8. The proposed retaining wall will be similar in size, color and design to the existing wall
located immediately north.
SITE INSPECTION
City Officials and Board Members are encouraged to visit the subject site prior to the meeting.
60-DAY TIMELINE
The application was deemed to be complete on or around March 29, 2002. Pursuant to M.S.S.
15.99, the City has 60 days to approve or deny the application unless an extension has been
requested by the municipality. The timeline for approval / denial of the application from Brett
Anderson expires on or around May 27, 2002.
-2204-
NOTIFICATION
While the City Code does not require public notification for variance requests, current City
policy indicates that adjacent property owners are notified as a courtesy. Member of the
property owners on May 3, 2002.
RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommends that the variance request(s) from Brett Anderson to allow the parking and
refuse storage improvements be approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The City Council approves a Public Lands Permit to allow excavation activities and the
continued use of the Belmont Lane right-of-way for parking purposes.
2. The setback on south side of the proposed parking area is increased to (10) feet in order to
meet the minimum requirement of the R-3 District.
The applicant procures the necessary permits from the City including, but not limited to,
a building permit, a grading permit and street excavation permit and submits all
appropriate information.
4. The request shall be made subject to all comments from City staff including the City
Engineer and Public Works Director.
5. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the variance
application.
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
Tentatively, the variance and public lands applications will be forwarded to the City Council for
review at its Tuesday, May 14, 2002 meeting in the event a recommendation from the Planning
Commission is made at its Monday, May 6, 2002 meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
· Landscaping Proposal / Project Narrative - LNR
November 15, 2001
· Variance application
· Hardcover calculation sheet
· Memorandum from City Engineer dated May 2,2002
· Survey from Sathre-Bergquist dated February 8, 2002.
· Digital photos - 2136 Belmont Lane
Suburban
Landscaping Inc. dated
-2205-
L & R SUBURBAN LANDSCAPING, INC.
Brett Anderson
2136 Belmont Lane
Mound, MN 55364
H (952)925-$656
F (952) 922-7229
Landscape Proposal
Additional Parkin£ Area Installation:
Installation procedure includes:
1.) Remove soil from a 24' x 40' x 6-1/2' area, includes hauling off.site.
2.)
Remove existing timber wall with disposal, includes existing concrete step with
wood sides.
3.)
Install 450 square feet of retaining wall using a 7" x 12" x 16" 3-way red London
stone wall to match neighboring wall color and style, to contain hill bank areas for
new and old wall application. Installation includes:
-Install a crushed gravel base with compaction.
-Set base block below grade for wall support.
-Install 3/4" pea rock with a fabric liner and three vents out wall with 4" tile.
-Backfill walls using on site material.
-Wall sizes 5' x 17', 5' x 18', 5' x 40' and 4' x 20'.
4.) Install a new block step with a simple handrail.
5.) Install a two-sided privacy fence for dumpster. Installation includes:
-Install (3) 3" support posts.
-Install 17' of chain link fence with two privacy laths.
-Install (1) 5' gate door with a 3" post.
-Approximate size to be 7' x 10'.
-Set in south corner of parking area up against wall area.
-2206-
L & R SUBURBAN LANDSCAPING, INC.
crushed minus driveway rock, includes compaction.
7.) Install dirt and seed over all edges and clean up of work site.
*Complete Landscape Proposal as Outlined: $15,500.00
-2207-
.J
-2208-
City of Mound
VARIANCE APPLICATION Application Fee: $200.00
P!anning Commission Date Case No. O2-/0
]~~ ............. City Planner ...... DNR
"~:~ Ci~ Engineer . P~KS' ~
Public Works Other
Please e )tint le;lil
LEGAL Lot
DESC.
Subdivision ......
PROPER. Nam, ~3C~ ~~)e~~ ........
Address .
APPLICANT Name
0F OTHEE
~dr~s
TH~
OWNER) Phone (H) ~). .(M)
"1,
Has an application ever been ~a.~Ie for zoning, vafianca, conditional use permit, or other zoning.procedure
for this property? Yes ( ) No (~. If yea, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s)
and provide copies of resolutiofls.
Variance Application
Page 1 of 3
Revised 01,/30/02
Detailed description of proposed constr~tion or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
-220@-
· fc~f ~ari.~n~ 're~ Lle.~,t;-i,e: 'setback'; iot~;,pre~ etc:)~: ......... ,~ ....................'~ .............
~..E..~.~J~: 1~'"'~ REQUIRED REQUESTED
(or existing)
Front Yard: ( N S E W )
Side Yard: ( N S E W )
· Side Yard: ( N S E W )
Rear Yard: ( N S E W )
Lakeside: ( N S E W )
: (NSEW)
Street Frontage:
Lot Size:
Hardcover:
ft. ff. ff.
ft. ft. ft.
ff. ff. ft.
ft. ft. ff.
ff. ff. ft.
ft. ft. ff.
sq ff sq ft .sq ft
.sq ft .sq ff ~sq ff
4. Does the present use o~ th~ property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is
located? Yes (), NO 00. tf no, specify each non-conforming use:
5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any. of the
uses permitted in that zoning district?
( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil
· ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation
( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify
Please describe:
Variance Application
Page 2 of 3
Revised 01/30/02
-2210-
03/12/02 11:30 Yk.,~ 9524720879 CITY 0F MOUND ~009
Case No. (~ ~-/O
after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), Elo {~. if yes~ explain:
7. Was the hard~hij~created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes (), No (~. If ¥~, explain:
8. Are the c~nditions of hardship ~r which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in
this petition? Yes (), No ("~. I~' no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
9. Comments:
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance Information
provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises descidbed in this application by any authorized
official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspectlng4or ~f posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be required by Law. , A /~1 /
ow..,....,...ur. ,,,
Applicant's signature.
Date
Variance Application
Page 3 of 3
.~a~aed 0'1/'30/02
-2211-
CITY OF MOUND
HARD~3OVER CALCULA'I'IONS
LOTAREA ~O(~,) SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. t '~,.~O(2~ J
LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 15% = (for detached buildings only) ..................F- J
· Existing Lots of Recorci may have 40 percent coverage provided that technlque~ are utilized, a~ outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225, SubcL
6.B.1 (see ba~). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official.
LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT
TOTAL HOUSE ....................................................
DETACHED BUILDINGS
'GARAGE/SHED)
DRIVEWAY, PARKING
AREAS, SIDEWALKS,
ETC.
X ~
TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ...............................
DECKS Open deck~ (1/4" min.
Opening between boards) with a
pervious surface under are not
~ounted as hardcovar,
X ~
qo 15 _.
X
X
X
TOTAL DECK .......................................................
X =
X
TOTAL OTHER ....................................................
TOTAL HAR~COVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE .~.~.~ ~' I J~ ~'~
PREPARED BY DATE
Rev 08-2~-94
I S6 /
-2212-
Engineering · Planning · Surveying
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 2, 2002
TO: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
FROM: John Cameron, City Engineer ~, RECEJVFP
SUBJECT: City of Mound · M/~Y 3 2002
~ .: .,. Variance Case g02-10 MOUND PL/~I~IFIII~/~J .&
.i'. , .: Brett Anderson, 2136 Belmont Lane '" · ......
MFRA #13729
As requested, we have reviewed the survey submitted with subject variance application and have the
following comments and recommendations.
The proposed retaining wall is shown with a setback of 14 1/2 feet from the right-of-way
line. The boulevard is approximately six feet wide. Even if a vehicle parks with the front
bumper against the wall, the rear will extend substantially into the boulevard. We would
suggest that the wall be moved back an additional 2 1/2 feet which would result in a setback
of 17 feet. This will greatly reduce the encroachment into City right-of-way and also match
the setback of the existing modular block wall to the north.
2. The parking area is shown with a gravel surface. We would highly recommend this area be
paved to prevent gravel from washing into the street.
s:~-ain:~mou 13729\correspondence~smith5 - 1
The concrete curb must be removed in the area of the additional parking and a new concrete
apron installed which matches the existing apron to the north.
The proposed retaining wall appears to be over four feet high, which requires engineering
data signed by a Registered Engineer.
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-mai/: mfra@mfra.com
-2213-
-2214-
-2215-
-2216-
THIS PAGE
IS
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
-2217-
0
%/
BELMONT- LANE
80.00 (PLAT)G ~79.91 (MEAS.)
I'1'1
Z
0
"'1"
I1
E)
x
-.,--23.51~"
i 80.00(¢~^T)
I
3.6.~7
!1
~-17.56.~
c.. ~ "r
0 ~n ~o
mo Om
Z Or'- o-I 0;~ o~
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
PREPARED FOR
BRITT AND~..RSON SATHRE-BERGqUIST, INC.
CITY OF MOUND,MINNESOTA i~,~/ ,S0SOUmB,0,DWA¥.W,¥ZA'A, UN. SS'"'(952) 476-6~0
~ ,
r
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
PUBLIC LANDS REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
SUBJECT:
Mound Council and Staff
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
May 6, 2002
Public Lands Permit Application - 2136 Belmont Lane
Brett Anderson
Belmont Avenue Right-Of-Way (ROW)
Parking Lot Improvements / Refuse Storage Structure
REQUEST
The applicant, Brett Anderson, purchased the property located at 2136 Belmont Lane in 2001 and
has submitted a Public Lands Permit application to allow expansion of the parking lot located on
the west side of the existing 4-plex. The project also includes the replacement of a timber
retaining wall with an interlocking block wall system and construction of a 10'x 10' refuse storage
enclosure to be located in the southwest corner. The primary purpose for the proposed
improvements is to correct a long-standing refuse storage issue as well as to provide additional
parking for the multiple-family structure.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lots 22 & 23, Block 6, Lakeside Park, A.L. Crockers ]st Division, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
CITY CODE 320 - PRIVATE STRUCTURES AND PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES ON PUBLIC LAND
City Code 320.01 regulates private structures and private construction activities on public land in
the City of Mound. Specifically, Subd. 3 regulates the continuation of an existing enroachment(s)
and Subd 4 regulates land alteration activities
CITY PERMITTING ISSUES
Members of the City Council are advised that the proposed project also requires the approval ora
number of other City permits which include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Variances
2. Building Permit
3. Grading Permit
4. Street Excavation Permit
-2219-
PROJECT DETAILS
Details regarding the project are outlined in Planning Report No. 02-10 dated May 1, 2002. The
proposal was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its May 6, 2002 meeting as the project
requires a number of variances. Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously
recommended approval of the variance(s) application subject'to specific conditions including, but
not limited to, the establishment of a ten (10) foot parking lot setback on the south side and the
extension of' the parking lot to the east in order to provide for a standard parking stall size of' 10'
x 20'.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
The proposal will correct a long-standing refuse storage problem which predates the
current owner and bring the property into compliance with the City Code.
2. The proposal will visually improve the subject site.
Based on discussions with the applicant, it is City staff's understanding that he is
contemplating whether or not the proposal may be implemented in full and may
consider an alternate proposal to address the refuse storage structure separately which
may eliminate the need for variance(s) and/or a Public Lands Permit.
SITE INSPECTION
City Officials and Board Members are encouraged to visit the subject site prior to the meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommends approval of the Public Lands Permit request from Brett Anderson subject
to the following conditions:
1. The City Council approves the variance(s) request.
The applicant procures the necessary permits from the City including, but not limited to, a
building permit, a grading permit and street excavation permit and submits all appropriate
information.
3. The request shall be made subject to all comments from City staff including the City
Engineer and Public Works Director.
ATTACHMENTS
· Draft resolution
· Public Lands Permit Application dated May 8, 2002
2
-2220-
FROM : BRETT ANDERSON APPRAISAL FAX NO. : 952 922 7229 Ma~. 10 2002 09:58AM
'City of Mound
PUBLIC ,LANDS APPLICATI~)N
Dock CommIssion Date
.D_J$=TrR! UTIO_N
City Council
V__ Building Official Parks Director
_ ~- _. _ DNR __ - MCW~_,~I
V Public Works ~' Other
CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT -new construction. NO]
PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUSES OR
OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND (City Code Section 320, Subd. 1).
PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT - to allow repairs to an existing structure
(City Code Section 320, Subd. 3).
CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE -to allow an existing encro_achment to remain in
an "as is" condition (City Code Section 320, Subd. 3).
Date Received __~~
X LAND ALTERATION - change in shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, fill,
× etc. (City Code Section 320, Subd. 4).
The struotare or work you are requesting ks an a~ivity on publioly owned lands. Structures like boat houses, patios,
. etc. are all NONCONFORMING U~ES. It Is the intent of the City to bring all these uses into confo~'nance, which
[hat L'hose structures Will at some time in the f~ture have to be removed from the public lands. Alt permits are
granted for a limited time and are non-transferable..~tai~wey construction must meet the State But[ding Code whe~
permit is for new ~onstruotion, or a new permit Is applied for due to a change in dock site holder.
Please t~pe m; prl~t_leglbl_y._. ,,,
Phone (Hi ~ . ..... (Mi
LEGAL. Lot
SubdMsion
ZONING DISTRICT R-1 R-lA R-2 ,?~ B,-1 B-2 B-3
Public Lands Permit Application
Page 1 of 2
Revised 03/20/02
-2221 -
FROM
BRETT ANDERSON APPRAISAL
FAX HO. : 952 922 ?229 Maw. 10 2002 09:59AM P3
PUBLIC Name
PROPER'i~
Pul~lio Lends Permit AppIIcal~on
Page 2 of 2
Revised 03/20/02
-2222-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 02-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR BRETT
ANDERSON AT 2136 BELMONT LANE
PID: 13-117-24-32-0095
WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Public Lands Permit to allow excavation and
construction activities in the Belmont Avenue right-of-way to expand the parking lot
located in front of the existing 4-plex structure as well as continued encroachment of the
parking lot in the public right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the proposal will correct a long-standing refuse storage problem which
predates the current owner; and
WHEREAS, City Code Section 320, requires City Council approval by a majority vote
for construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the
natural contour of any public way, park or commons; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission discussed the proposal at its May 6, 2002
meeting as the project also requires a number of variances; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the
variance(s) application subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered this request at their meetings of May 14, 2002;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, to approve the Public Lands Permit as submitted by Brett Anderson subject to
the following condition(s):
1. The City Council approved the variance(s) application.
-2223-
The applicant procures the necessary permits from the City, including, but not
limited to, a building permit, a grading permit and street excavation permit and
submits all appropriate information.
The request shall be made subject to all comments from City staff including the
City Engineer and the Public Works Director.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
by Councilmember
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of May 2002.
and seconded
Mayor Pat Meisel
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-2224-
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. of Minnesota, Inc.
May 6, 2002
Mr. Gino Businaro, Finance Director
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
RE: 2002 LMCIT Insurance Renewal
Dear Gino:
There is a small decrease in your City's total renewal premium, from $147,235 to
$144,333. While most insurance costs are increasing, your City has been able to avoid
this addkional expense even though your Workers' Compensation has increased.
Workers' Compensation - estimated deposit premium increased from $35,853 to $41,996
due to:
1) The Experience Modification increased from .87 to .88, which is still a 12% credit.
2) Estimated payroll increases, and a 7% average Workers' Compensation rate increase.
3) The Managed Care premium credit reduction from 5% to 3%.
LMCIT Package -the premium decrease is primarily due to:
1) Property-The LMCIT increased the property values 1.011% for inflation.
2) Municipal Liability (including Public Officials Liability)-Liability rates are
unchanged, but your estimated operating expenditures increased from $3,241,240 to
$3,713,410. Your experience rating charge is down 17% becau se of excellent claims
experience during the 2/01/00-0 l policy year. The biggest Liability premium impact
continues to be Land Use claims.
3) Automobile Physical Damage premium has decreased from $20,576 to $12,623. This
is due to the LMCIT enforcing the rule that only high cost vehicles 10 years or newer
can be covered for Replacement Cost. The 2/1/01-02 policy had 9 vehicles on
Replacement Cost, but after 2/1/02 only the 1995 Ford Sewer Truck and the 1995
Freightliner Pumper have Replacement Cost coverage.
Land Use and Employment Practice losses are given more penalty weight than other
general or automobile claims in the LMCIT liability premium experience rating system.
Essentially, these losses are "counted double" their defense and loss costs, as these claims
often depend on the City's own discretionary decisions.
In addition, on Land Use, Development or Franchise Litigation claims the City must pay
50% of any defense costs incurred prior to reporting the litigation to the LMCIT. After
the litigation has been reported, the City has to pay 15% of the incurred defense costs
from $50,000 to $250,000, and then 40% of any defense costs in excess of $250,000. The
7825 Washington Avenue South #300
Minneapolis, MN 55439-2433
952.944.8885
Fax 952.944.9795
Toll Free 800.373.2457
www.ajg.com - 2225-
City is also responsible for ! 5% of any damages which the "city" shall be required to
pay.
Open Meeting Law Defense Cost Reimbursemem is an LMCIT coverage your City has
chosen. The policy definition is: "Open Meeting Law lawsuit" means a lawsuit seeking
penalties against a city official based on an allegation that the city official has violated M.
S. 471.705, commonly known as the Minnesota Open Meeting Law.
I am looking forward to continuing to work with you in providing for the City's
insurance needs.
Sincerely,
Carl A. Ben~
-2226-
CITY OF MOUND
CLAIMS ANALYSIS (AS OF 3/31/02)
1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02
PAID LOSSES 17,602 39,281 79,144 1,039 108,809
PAID EXPENSES
130,445 72,698 46,992 0 39,901
RESERVE LOSSES
0 0 0 0 3,001
RESERVE EXPENSES
0 0 0 1 10,001
TOTAL ENCURREDAMOUNT 148,047 111,979 126,136 1,039 16,712
SAL/SUBRO AMOUNT
0 0 -1,120 0 -300
DEDUCTIBLE RECOVERY
-5,000 -8,050 -5,798 -1,000 -6,420
DEDUCTIBLE: $500 PRIOR TO 2/1/97, AND $1,000 THEREAFTER.
CLAIMS: (CLOSED OVER $5~000 COST AND SELECTED OPEN CLAIMS)
CLAIM # DATE
11016835A-C 01/13/97
11019873 02/01/92
11022581 05/15/98
11022635 11/25/97
11025400 01/04/99
11026123A-D 03/08/99
11029780 04/21/98
11034139A-C 01/09/01
11036015A-Q 06/11/01
11036080 06/14/01
11037340A-B 08/01/01
DESCRIPTION
Insured's plow hit claimant's vehicle, which struck garage
(Paid Loss $4,649 + $1,308)
(Claim made 8/14/97) Land Use easement rights (Paid Loss $0,
Paid Expense $130,363)
Property storm debris removal (Paid Loss $16,706)
(Claim made 5/13/98) Land Use, Writ of Mandamus (Closed Pd
Defense $72,698, Pd Loss $0)
Lift station motor explosion (Paid Loss $10,712)
Insured's vehicle hit utility pole (Paid Loss $12,398)
(Claim made 5/21/99 - Westonka ISD- Alleged Breach of
Contract (Paid Loss $60,000 & Paid Expense $46,992)
(Claim Made 2/7/01) Land Use-Redevelopment-(Paid Loss
$12,500, Paid Expense $39,601)
Wind damage to city property (Paid Loss $77,070)
Tree on lift station control panel (Paid Loss $9,619)
Land Use-Alleged commons title ownership (Open)
Rem arks:
This information is provided for loss control analysis purposes only, and should
be disseminated to others with discrimination for confidentiality.
-2227-
Market Premium Summary
Coverages
Expiring Renewing Company 2 Company 3
Property $10,499 $10,344
Boiler & Machinery 1,604 1,733
Inland Madne 2,518 2,363
Employee Dishonesty 1,353 1,336
General Liability 51,857 52,460
Foreign Liability
Commercial Auto 38,504 28,707
Subtotal $106,335 $96,943 $0 $0
Worker's Compensation 35,853 41,996
Umbrella/Excess Liability
Liquor Liability 4,275 4,613
Group Self Insd Acc Plan
Open Meeting Law 772 781
Grand Total $147,235 $144,333 $0 $0
Notes and highlights:
1. Payment Plan: Direct Bill
2. Carriers
r-] Admitted
[~] Nonadmitted
R:\Client Files\Cities\Cities\Mound\Current\Y02 Summary. Doc
-2228-
FROM A J Gal lagher (952)944-9795 (MON) 5. 6' 02 16:09/ST. 15:44/N0. ~7600859B5 P I
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. of Minnesota, Inc.
7825 Washington Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55439-2433
Date May 6, 2002
Number of pages including cover sheet
To: Gino Businaro
City Of Mound
From: Pat Meger
Busmess 952-472-0608
Resident Phone
FazPhone 952-472-0620 Fax Phone
CC:
952-944-8885
952-944-9795
Urgent For your review X Reply ASAP Please comment
Gino:
In follow up to your meeting with Carl, following is the revised LMCIT Waiver Form to be signed and
returned with a copy o£the resolution amending the coverage.
Thank you.
-2229-
FROM A J Gallagher (952) 944-9795 (MON) 5. 6'02 16:09/ST. 15:44/N0. B760085935 P 2
LMCIT LIABILTIY COVERAGE - WAIVER FORM
Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide
whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability 1/mits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The
decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects.
> If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover
no more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply
would be limited to $1,000,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the
city purchases the optional excess liability coverage.
> If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single
claimant could potentially recover up to $1,000,000 on a single occurrence. The total which alt
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply
would also be limited to $1,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants.
> If the city waives the statutory tort limits andpurchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant
could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would
also be limited to the mount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants.
Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by th/s decision.
The decision must be made by the city council. Cities purchasing coverage must complete and return
this form to the LMCIT before the effective date of the coverage. For further information, contact
LMCIT. You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney.
The City of Mound & I-IRA accepts liability coverage limits of $
from the League of Minnesota C/ties Insurance Trust (LMCIT).
300,000/1,000,000
Check one:
X
The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established
by Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes
466.04, to the extent of the limits of the 1/ability coverage obtained from LMCIT.
Date of city council meeting
Signature
Position
Return this completed from to LMCIT, 145 University Ave. FE., St. Paul MN 55103-2044
Page 1 of I
-2230-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-.._
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER AND CONVEYANCE OF
LAND
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound, Minnesota
has previously entered into an agreement entitled Assignable Option to Purchase Land calling for
the sale, by the Authority of a certain tract of land described in the attached Exhibit A, (the 'Subject
Property") for development as a post office facility in Mound, and
WHEREAS, in performance of its obligations thereunder, the Authority has acquired all private
interests in the subject properties, and
WHEREAS, a portion of the land to be conveyed pursuant to the agreement is currently owned by
the City, and
WHEREAS, in order to fulfill its obligations under the agreement, it will be necessary for the
Authority to obtain title from the City, and
WHEREAS, the City believes that the continued location of a post office facility in the downtown
area of Mound a vital benefit to the citizens, of Mound, and to the local businesses and their
patrons, and
WHEREAS, the City is willing to assist the Authority by providing the requested land to it.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, MinnesOta as
follows:
The transfer and conveyance of the City's right title and interest in the Subject Property
to the Authority is hereby approved.
The City, acting through its elected and appointed officials is directed to take all
steps and do all things reasonably necessary to effectuate this resolution.
The foregoing resolutiOn was moved by Councilmember
Councilmember
and seconded by
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound this 14th day of May, 2002
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
-2231 -
Exhibit A
Lots 6 thru 11, Koehler's Addition to Mound, Lake Minnetonka, except (1) the South 10 feet of said
Lot 6; (2) the South 10 feet of the West % of Lot 7; (3) the South 5 feet of the East ~ of Lot 7; and
that part of Lots 10 and 11 lying Eastedy of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the North line of said Lot 11, distant 6.00 feet Westerly of the Northeast
comer of said Lot 11; thence Southerly, parallel with the East line of said Lot 11, a distance of
41.47 feet; thence Southerly 155.80 feet along a tangential curve, concaved Westerly, having a
radius of 300.~ feet and a central angle of 29 degrees 45 minutes 23 seconds and said line
there terminating.
-2232-
To: Grbg~gkinner and Len Harre~/~
From' Mound Fire Department
4/17/02
R.E. · Street closing
The Mound Fire Department is requesting to close Wilshire blvd between Maywood Rd.
and Lakewood Rd. The Fire Department will be having their 51 ~t annual fish fry. We
would like to close the road between 10:00 am and 1:00 am on Saturday June 1st 2002.
Thanks
Tony Myers
Mound Fire Departmem
-2233-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
To:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
'TO THE FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT (FMLA)
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
BONNIE RITTER
PROPOSED CHANGES TO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AS IT RELATES
May 10, 2002
The enclosed are proposed changes to the Administrative Code.
The Parental Leave and Leave of Absence Without Pay have minor changes to adhere
and complement the Family Medical Leave Act.
The Family Medical Leave Act was passed by the Federal Government in 1993, and the
City needs to change their code to comply with this Act.
printed on recycled paper
-2234-
PARENTALLEAVE
In compliance with Minnesota State Statutes 181.941, an employee is entitled to take
an unpaid leave of absence in connection with the birth or adoption of a child. The
length of the leave shall not exceed six (6) weeks, and must begin not more than six (6)
weeks after the birth or adoption, except that, in the case where the child must remain in
the hospital longer than the mother, the leave may not begin more than six (6) weeks
after the child leaves the hospital.
The employee is entitled to return to work in the same position and at the same rate of
pay the employee was receiving prior to commencement of the leave. Group insurance
will remain in effect during this leave, with employee making premium payments to the
City while on this leave of absence.
If the employee has any FMLA leave eligibility remaining at the same time this leave
commences, this leave will also count towards FMLA leave. The two leaves will run
concurrently until the twelve (12) week FMLA eligibility is exhausted, with FMLA
insurance regulations in effect (with employee retained on theCity, shealth plan under
the same conditions that applied before leave commenced) if applicable.
The employee must use accrued sick leave and compensatory time off for Parental
Leave or FMLA Leave, and may opt to use accrued vacation time.
LEAVE OF ABSENCE WlTHOUT PAY
The City Manager may, upon recommendation of the employee's department head,
allow a regular full-time employee a leave of absence without pay for a period of up to
ninety (90) days for good and sufficient reasons, which are to be in the best interests of
the City. Such period may be extended up to one (1) year with the authorization of the
City Manager. While on leave of absence without pay, the employee shall not be
entitled to accrue vacation time, sick leave, receive insurance benefits, or earn seniority.
Insurance benefits may be obtained by the employee paying his/her full premium.
-2235-
FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT (FMLA)
Pursuant to the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, the City provides twelve (12) weeks
of job protected unpaid leave to eligible employees for the birth, adoption, foster care
and certain family medical reasons.
· ELIGIBILITY - An employee must have been employed by the City for at least
twelve (12)months, have worked at least 1,250_hours during theAwelve~l 2)
months preceding the commencement of the leave, and be employed at a work
site at which 50 or more employees are employed within 75 miles.
ELIGIBLE REASONS FOR FMLA LEAVE -An eligible employee is entitled to
twelve (12)weeks leave. The length of the leave will not exceed 12 weeks in a
12-month period. The 12-month period is measured forward from the first date
leave is used. Eligible employees are entitled to 12 workweeks of unpaid family
and medical leave per year for:
Birth of a child or placement of a child with the employee for adoption or
foster care.
To care for a spouse, child, step-child, or parent who has a serious health
condition. This includes psychological, physical care, and sharing care
duties, as outlined in the FMLA Handbook.
An eligible child is defined as a person under 18 years of age (or a child
18 and older of incapable of self-care or because of mental or physical
disability as defined by the Americans with Disability Act) who is biological,
adopted, foster or step-child, ward of the employee or a person with whom
the employee is charged with a parent's rights, duties and responsibilities.
An eligible parent includes a biological parent, or a person who acts in the
place of a parent ("in Ioco parentis") when the employee was under the
legal age, but does not include in-laws.
Serious health condition making the employee unable to perform the
functions of his/her position because he/she is unable to work at all due to
the serious health condition, or unable to perform any one of the essential
functions of the position within the meaning of the Americans with
Disabilities Act. Serious health condition is defined in Federal law C.F.R.
825.114,
-2236-
NOTICE REQUIREMENTS - Thirty (30) days written notice is required if the
leave is foreseeable (by submitting the Application For Family/Medical Leave
form). If thirty (30) days notice is not possible, as much notice as practical must
be given. Planned medical treatments should be scheduled so that it will not
unduly disrupt the City's operation.
· BENEFIT COVERAGE DURING LEAVE - During a period of family or medical
leave, an employee will be' retained ontheC-ity'-s healthpla~n-und:er~t~e
conditions that applied before leave commenced. To continue health coverage,
the employee must continue to make any contributions that he or she made to
the plan before taking leave. Failure of the employee to pay his or her share of
the health insurance premium may result in loss of coverage. If the employee
fails to return to work after the expiration of the leave, the employee will be
required to reimburse the City for payment of health insurance premiums during
the family leave, unless the reason the employee fails to return is the presence
of a serious health condition which prevents the employee from performing his or
herjob or to circumstances beyond the employee's control, An-employee is not
entitled to accrual of any seniority or employment benefits (during unpaid portion
of leave) that would have accrued if not for the taking of leave. An employee
who takes family or medical leave will not lose any seniority or employment
benefits that accrued before the date leave began.
INCREMENTS OF TIME - Family and medical leave may be taken in
increments of up to the full twelve (12) weeks and as small as one (1) hour,
depending on the circumstances. When medical treatments are planned,
employees should consult with their respective Department Head and make
reasonable effort to schedule the leave so as not to unduly disrupt the City's
operations.
USE OF ACCRUED SICK LEAVE, COMPENSATORY TIME OFF AND
VACATION DURING FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE - During the family and medical
leave, employees must use accrued sick leave and compensatory time prior to
taking unpaid leave. Use of accrued vacation time is an option. When sick
leave and compensatory time have been exhausted, any remaining time will be
unpaid. Unpaid hours will not count toward seniority and benefits will not accrue
during this unpaid leave.
MEDICAL CERTIFICATION - An application for leave based on the serious
health condition of the employee or the employee's spouse, child or parent must
also be accompanied by a "Medical Certification Statement" completed by the
applicable health care provider. The certification must state the date on which
the health condition commenced, the probable duration of the condition, and the
appropriate medical facts regarding the condition.
-2237-
· ' ~E:CERTi~ibATi~N~ ~e:ce~ificati~n ~ill be. reqLcre~ ift~e ~pi~y~ re~e~-tS'
an extension of the original length approved by the City or if the employee's
circumstances change. Re-certification may also be required if there is a
question as to the validity of the certification if the employee is unable to return to
work due to the serious health condition.
· RETURN FROM LEAVE - An employee must complete a "Notice of Intention to
Return From Family or Medical Leave" before he or she can be returned to
active status. If an employee wishes to return to work prior to the expiration of a
family or medical leave of absence, notification must be given to the employee's
supervisor at least five (5) working days prior to the employee's planned return.
· FITNESS FOR DUTY CERTIFICATION - In the case of medical leave due to an
employee's health, the City requires a medical certificate attesting to the
employee's fitness for duty prior to return to work. The fitness for duty report
must be based on the particular health condition(s) for which the leave was
approved and must address whether the employee can perform the essential
functions of the job. The City Manager may consult with a physician or other
expert to determine reasonable accommodations for any employee who is a
"qualified disabled" employee under the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act).
The City will deny reinstatement until a fitness for duty certificate is provided.
RESTORATION TO EMPLOYMENT - An employee eligible for family and
medical leave - with the exception of those employees designated as "highly
compensated employees" - will be restored to his or her old position or to a
position with equivalent pay, benefits, and other terms and conditions of
employment. The City cannot guarantee that an employee will be returned to his
or her original job. The determination as to whether a position is an 'equivalent
position" will be made by the City.
FAILURE TO RETURN FROM LEAVE - The failure of an employee to return to
work upon the expiration of a family or medical leave of absence will subject the
employee to immediate termination unless an extension is granted. An
employee who requests an extension of family leave or medical leave due to the
continuation, recurrence or onset of her or his own serious health condition, or of
the serious health condition of the employee's spouse, child or parent, must
submit a request for an extension, in writing, to the employee's immediate
supervisor. This written request should be made as soon as the employee
realizes that she or he will not be able to return at the expiration of the leave
period.
-2238-
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION
AND OPERATION OF SKATE PARK
5/8/02
WHEREAS, the City of Mound is owner of a tract of land located within City and shown
on the attached Exhibit A (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the City has been approached by community groups and individuals who have
suggested that it would be desirable and in the public interest to construct a skate park facility on the
Property, and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the community importance of providing the skate park for
use by the public, and recognizes the benefit and the necessity of working cooperatively with
volunteers, and with the Mound Crime Prevention Association (the "Association") to accomplish
the construction of a skate park on the Property, and
WHEREAS, the Association recognizes the skate park as serving a vital crime prevention
objective, and wishes to participate through assisting the City, as requested, by receiving cash
donations for the skate park, and by utilizing those donations for the construction of the skate park,
either through the purchase of material, equipment or supplies, or by providing designated skate
park contributions to the City, and
WHEREAS, The City, recognizing that the skate park cannot otherwise become a reality,
desires to enlist the assistance and cooperation of individuals who are willing to volunteer their
services in the activities necessary for the establishment of the skate park, and in seeking funding for
the construction and the ongoing maintenance and operation of the skate park, and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to establish the basic framework for those relationships in this
resolution, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 471.15-. 191 and other law, City has
the authority to operate a program of public recreation and enter into agreements with the
Association pertaining to the conduct thereof.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF MOUND, as follows:
1. COMMITTEE. The City Council hereby designates the Mound Zero Gravity Skate
Park Task Force as an advisory committee of the City Council. The task force was previously
formed to work for the establishment of the skate park. It is the intention of the City that this status
will provide the members of the Committee the same liability coverages and indemnities that are
JBD-211846v5
MU200-100
-2239-
........... ~ilabI~T6~tl~e'-~e~;b-fo~h~_ri-~idV-l~6_~_W~66-~iit~ commissions of-thW~Th~0mmittee
will work with the Council and city staff and assist the City in matters relating to the skate park as
stated in this resolution.
2. SKATE PARK DESIGN. The Committee will assist the City in preparing a
proposed design for the skate park and preparing the proposed plans and specifications for the
same. The City will supply the Committee with all information necessary to assist it in the
design. The proposed design, plans and specifications will be subject to the approval of the City.
3. PRELIMINARY CITY WORK. The City will proceed with the following matters
which are required to be done in advance of final design and construction of the skate park:
a. Delineation of wetland boundary on the Property.
b. Preparation of mitigation plan if required based on the delineation.
c. Obtaining all necessary approvals of mitigation plan.
do
Use of staff time in preparation of such matters, and in attending any meetings or
hearings at which such items will be considered.
The City's obligation under this section shall be limited to the expenditure of not more than $3,000
in consultant fees and other out of pocket costs on those matters. The City shall have no obligation
to continue work on these matters once it has expended such amount or until it is satisfied that
funding for further activities will be available.
4. FUNDING. The City is relying on public contributions in order to construct the
skate park. Absent such contributions, the skate park can not be built. Consequently, one of the
important roles of the Committee will be to undertake, on behalf of the City, the activities to raise
cash and other forms of contributions for the construction of the skate park. The Committee will
keep the City informed as to the nature, and status of such activities. All arrangements involving
the donation of labor, materials or services will require the approval of the City. The Committee
will also work with the Association to determine the procedure for receiving cash contributions and
for acknowledging the same.
5. PERMITS AND APPROVALS. The City will be responsible for obtaining all
necessary permits and approvals required for the construction of the skate park. The City will
consider the waiver of any permit or license fee if such waiver is consistent with City policy and
serves a public purpose.
6. CONSTRUCTION OF SKATE PARK. The City intends to commence construction
of the skate park once i.) the design, plans and specifications have been approved by the City, and
all necessary permits and approvals have been obtained, and, ii.) pledges of money, labor,
materials or services-in-kind equal to at least 50% of the estimated cost of construction of the skate
park have been received, and it appears to the satisfaction of the City that the balance can be timely
secured. Prior to that time, the City may engage in minor brushing on the Property and removal of
JBD-211846v5
MU200-100
-2240-
trees on the port~-6-~roperty with~n~n-the right o~h~ood Road. It ~s expected that
........... [fie Comn?iff~e W~ilr:ifi~f'~i signi~-~int ~o~b in assi2-tiia~: the-'~i~h~nZsiTe'~t-i~iii~ dufin~
construction, however, all supervision, site control and responsibility during construction will rest
with the City.
7. REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS; OPERATION. In light of the significant
nature of public support and contributions that will be required for the construction of the skate
park, the City agrees to use its best efforts to operate and maintain the skate park for at least ten
years following construction. The ability of the City to do so will be dependent upon continuing
efforts of the Committee to be able to assist in seeking funding for the continued operation,
maintenance and repair of the skate park. The City agrees that revenues generated by vending
machines and advertising devices placed at the skate park by the City will be used for repair and
maintenance of the skate park. The City will look to the Committee to assist by arranging for the
sale of advertising space under terms to be set by the City.
8. ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY OF ASSOCIATION. The City will enter into an
agreement with the Mound Crime Prevention Association in substantially the form of the attached
Exhibit B.
The question was on adoption of the resolution and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against the same: None.
WHEREUPON SAID RESOLUTION WAS DECLARED
ADOPTED THIS DAY OF MAY, 2002.
DULY PASSED AND
Pat Meisel, Mayor
(SEAL)
., City Clerk
JBD-211846v5
MU200-100
-2241 -
EXHIBIT A
[Insert legal description[
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
JBD-211846v5
MU200-100
A-1
-2242-
EXHIBIT B
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is entered into as of the __ day of ,2002, by
and between the City of Mound, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota ( the
"City") and the Mound Crime Prevention Association, a Minnesota non-profit corporation (the
"Association").
BACKGROUND
WHEREAS, the City of Mound is owner of a tract of land located within City and shown
on the attached Exhibit A (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the community importance of providing the skate park for
use by the public, recognizes the benefit of working cooperatively volunteers, and with the Mound
Crime Prevention Association (the "Association") to accomplish the construction of a skate park on
the Property, and
WHEREAS, the Association recognizes the skate park as serving a vital crime prevention
objective, and wishes to participate through assisting the City, as requested, by receiving cash
donations for the skate park, and by utilizing those donations for the construction of the skate park,
either through the purchase of material, equipment or supplies, or by providing funds to the City.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein
contained, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows:
1. ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ASSOCIATION. The Association
represents that it is an exempt organization within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code and of the provisions of state law; that contributions to it qualify for treatment as a
charitable deduction under state and federal law; that certain purchases made by it are exempt
from sales and use taxes under state law.
ao
The Association shall serve the following roles in connection with the
development of the skate park:
(1)
The Association will receive cash contributions that are designated as
given for the benefit of the skate park.
(2)
The Association will acknowledge the receipt of such designated skate
park contributions and will provide the donor with information to assist the
donor in seeking to obtain a deduction from state and federal income taxes.
JBD-2! 1846v5
MU200-100
B-1
-2243-
The Association will be responsible to donor for any .claims rased on the
"material sUpplied by Associati~nl
(3)
The Association will utilize the designated donated skate park funds for the
construction of the skate park. The funds may be made available, at the
discretion of the Association, and after consultation with the City, either
through cash contributions, or through the purchase of equipment,
materials and supplies to be donated to the City for construction of the
skate park.
(4)
The Association will be responsible for keeping all appropriate accounts,
and making and maintaining all necessary records and reports regarding its
activities under this paragraph.
(5)
The Association may assist the City, as they shall agree in writing, in
fundraising and donation solicitation activities for the skate park.
bo
Except as to the matters described in sub paragraph a of this section, the
Association will have no obligation or responsibility under this Agreement. As
example, and not as limitation, the Association will have no responsibility or
liability for the design, construction, operation, maintenance or repair of the skate
park (unless it involves itself in such activities by formal action of its board of
directors).
2. INDEMNITY. The City agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the
Association, its officers, agents and employees from any claim or action occasioned by or arising
out of the design, construction, operation, maintenance or repair of the skate park, except as to
claims based on actual participation of the Association in such activities based on formal action
by its board of directors. The provisions of this Paragraph will survive the termination of this
Agreement.
3. DEFAULT. If any party fails to perform any of its obligations under this
Agreement ,any other party shall, following the giving or 20-days written notice to the defaulting
party, have the right to exercise any one or more of the following remedies: (a) to immediately
terminate this Agreement as it relates to the party providing the notice; and (b) to pursue any
other remedy at law or in equity. All remedies are cumulative and nonexclusive, and may be
exercised concurrently or separately. The defaulting party shall pay all expenses, including but
not limited to attorneys fees, incurred by the noticing party in exercising any of its fights or
remedies hereunder or enforcing any of the terms hereof. Before availing itself of any remedy
under this paragraph, the noticing party will attempt to work out the dispute through informal
communication; and if resolution is not thereby achieved, by submitting the dispute to mediation
by a neutral person.
4. ASSIGNMENT. No party shall assign or pledge this Agreement in whole or in
part, nor any interest herein, without the prior written consent of the other parties, and any such
consent shall not be deemed to be a consent to any subsequent similar act.
JBD-211846v5
MU200-100
B-2
-2244-
. ~s greemen s a erm~naea eexp~ratono e lys
obligation to maintain the skate park, or pursuant to Section 13 above..
6. MISCELLANEOUS.
No failure or delay by either party in exercising any right or remedy hereunder
shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any
right or remedy preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of
any other right or remedy hereunder. Any waiver must be in writing and signed
by the party granting the waiver.
bo
Any titles of the several parts of the Agreement are inserted for convenience of
reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its
provisions.
A notice, demand, or other communication under this Agreement by either party to
the other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally to
the following addresses:
City:
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound MN 55364
Atto: Kandis M. Hanson, City Manager
Association:
or at such other address with respect to such party as that party may, from time to
time, designate in writing and forward to the other as provided in this Section.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which
shall constitute one and the same instrument.
This Agreement is made and shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the
state of Minnesota. Resolution of all disputes, controversies, or claims arising out
of this Agreement shall first be sought through informal communication and then
by third party mediation as provided for in Paragraph 13 above. Claims, disputes
or controversies not resolved by those means are to be brought in the state or
federal courts of Minnesota, and the parties to this Agreement waive any
objection to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on convenience or
otherwise.
JBD-211846v5
MU200-100
B-3
-2245-
.... f. If any pr0Vls,on -$~:~ appl~cati0n .~{~- thi. s.~ x-greem~-ni.---i~, het-~"--'ui~l-a~fut, or
unenforceable m any respect, such ii'legality or unenforceabiiity shall not. affect
other provisions or applications that can be given effect, and this Agreement shall
be construed as if the unlawful or unenforceable provision or application had
never been contained herein or prescribed hereby.
go
This Agreement, together with its Exhibit constitutes the complete and exclusive
statement of all mutual understandings between the parties with respect to this
Agreement, superseding all prior or contemporaneous proposals, communications,
and understandings, whether oral or written, concerning this Agreement. This
Agreement may not be amended nor any of its terms modified except by a writing
authorized and executed by all parties hereto.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the
date first written above.
CITY OF MOUND
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
MOUND CRIME PREVENTION
ASSOCIATION
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
JBD-211846v5
M U200-100
B-4
-2246-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
[Insert Legal Description]
SBD-211846v5
MU200-100
B-5
-2247-
~ood
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
PUBLIC LANDS REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
SUBJECT:
Mound Council, Docks and Commons Commission and Staff
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Jim Fackler, Parks Director
May 8, 2002
Public Lands Permit Application - New Public Skate Park
City of Mound/ Zero Gravity Skate Park Task Force
Maywood Avenue Right-of-Way (ROW) / City Hall Property (PiD # 24-
117-24-21-0034
Construction of a Recreational Facility - Skateboarding Park
REQUEST
The applicant, the Zero Gravity Skate Park Task Force in cooperation with the City of Mound, is
requesting an Public Lands Permit to allow construction of a new skate park in the Maywood
Road right-of-way to be located between Mound City Hall on the south side and Wolner Field on
the north side. Portions of the improvements also extend on to the City Hall property located at
5341 Maywood Road.
The proposed skate park will be approximately 12,000 square feet and will feature a bowl, half
pipe and a street course. It also includes portable restroom facilities, signage and
refreshment/vending machines as well as areas for vehicle parking and viewing areas. A copy of
the proposed site plan has been included a separate attachment.
CITY CODE 320 - PRIVATE STRUCTURES AND PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES ON PUBLIC LAND
City Code 320.01 regulates private structures and private construction activities on public land in
the City of Mound. Specifically, Subd. 1 regulates new construction activities on public lands.
PROJECT HISTORY
The proposal originated from the Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative following the
closing the Take Five Skate Park in 1999 at which time a petition signed by 400 individuals was
submitted expressing support for a new skate park facility.
-2248-
In July 2001, the City Council approved the Maywood Road site for use as a skate park following
a recommendation from the Parks and Open Space Commission (POSAC) and budgeted
$3000.00 for fiscal year 2002 for the project. Members of the City Council are advised that the
new park will be owned and operated by the City of Mound.
Members of the Task Force have been meeting for the past 1-2 years on the project and have
capital fundraising activities underway with the goal of funding the project through monetary and
in-kind donations.
Details regarding the City's agreement with the Task Force regarding various project issues
including, but not limited to, liability, project construction timeline, financial contributions, etc.
are outlined in the Acceptance Agreement which will be presented by the City Attorney as a
separate agenda item.
PERMITTING ISSUES
The proposal requires multiple permits from the City of Mound that include, but are not limited
to, the following:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Wetlands replacement plan.
Street excavation permit
Building permit
Grading permit
Stormwater permit
Members of the City Council are advised that the City Engineer prepared the grading and wetands
mitigation plan. It is anticipated that the stormwater permit process begin following transfer of the
permitting responsibilities to the City of Mound from the MCWD. It is anticipated that any
disturbed wetlands can be replaced on-site. Members that of the City Council are advised that the
City Engineer has begun work on the wetlands replacement plan and review process.
A copy of the grading and wetlands mitigation plan is in file on City Hall and will be made
available upon request.
LAND USE ISSUES
The proposed project is to be located in the Maywood Road right-of-way Portions of the park
improvements also appear to extend on to the City Hall property.
The property located immediately north (Wolner Field) is zoned B-1 Central Business. The City
Hall property is zoned R-1 Single-Family Residential. Public park and recreational facilities are
permitted uses in both the B-1 and R-1 zoning districts.
-2249-
Until additional details are made available regarding the proposed improvements (ie. half-pipe,
etc.), it is not yet known whether or not they are subject to setback requirements. Members of
the City Council are advised that it is City staff's understanding that play equipment has not been
subject to setback requirements in the past.
In the event the equipment is subject to setback requirements, a variance(s) could be needed and
the application would requirement review and approval by the Planning Commission and Council.
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION REVIEW
The proposal, in concept, was reviewed previously by the Parks and Open Space Commission
(POSAC) on July 24, 2001 meeting. At its April 11, 2002 meeting, the POSAC, made a
recommendation that the Public Lands Permit application for the skate park project could be
forwarded on to the City Council as it was reviewed previously and received favorable response.
SITE INSPECTION
City Officials and Board Members are encouraged to visit the subject site prior to the meeting, if
appropriate.
SKATE PARK TASK FORCE
It is anticipated that representatives of the Task Force will be present at the meeting to explain
details about the propOsed project.
RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommends approval of the Public Lands Permit to allow construction of the Zero
Gravity Skate Park in the Maywood Avenue right-of-way which also extend on to the City Hall
property subject to the following conditions:
1. The Zero Gravity Skate Park Task Force obtains all required permits to allow
construction of the project including the submittal of all information deemed necessary.
2. The City of Mound and Zero Gravity Skate Park Task Force enter into the Acceptance
Agreement.
3
-2250-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 02-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR THE ZERO
GRAVITY TASK FORCE AND THE CITY OF MOUND FOR USE OF
MAYWOOD ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AND CITY HALL PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD AS A SKATE PARK
WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Public Lands Permit to allow construction of a
new skate park in the Maywood Road right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, certain improvements of the new skate park will extend on to the northern
portion of the City Hall property located at 5341 Maywood Road; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the use of the property as skate park in 2001
following a favorable recommendation from the Parks and Open Space Commission
which was made at its July 24, 2001 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the skate park proposal was also reviewed again by the Parks and Open
Space Commission at its April 11, 2002 meeting at which time the POSAC voted to
forward the project on to the City Council without reviewing the Public Lands Permit
application as they are very familiar and supportive of the project; and
WHEREAS, City Code Section 320, requires City Council approval by a majority vote
for constructiOO 9f any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the
natural contour of any public way, park or commons; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, to approve the Public Lands Permit to allow construction of the Zero Gravity
Skate Park subject to the following condition(s):
The Zero Gravity Skate Park Task Force obtains all required permits to allow
construction of the project including the submittal of all information deemed
necessary.
2. The City of Mound and Zero Gravity Skate Park Task Force enter into the
Acceptance Agreement.
-2251 -
Th~ foregomg'resolfihon-~V-~S-md b¥:~ffnci:~~: :: ...... '~: sec6fi-d~d .... ....
by Councilmember
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of May 2002~
Mayor Pat Meisel
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-2252-
CITY OF MOUND 534.1MAYVVOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-0600
March 13, 2002
MEMORANDUM
TO: POSAC
FROM: Jim Fackler, Park Director
REF: Skate Park
Staff has been working with the Skate Park Committee to
press forward with the construction.
At this time we would like to ask the commission to allow
the Skate Park to go forward without coming in front of them
with a Public Lands Permit. This is being requested so that
the process can be placed on a fast track to the City
Council.
print"'~~ 'ec¥cled paper
-2253-
City of Mound
.'" ,
DISTRIBUTION Building Official ~ Parks Director
DNR MC::WD
Check One -
'~~' CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT - new construction. NOTE:
~ PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUSES OR
OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND (City Code Section 320, Subd, 1).
[-7 PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT -to allow repairs to an existing structure
(City Code Section 320, Subd. 3).
CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE - to allow an existing encroachment to remain in
an "as is" condition (City Code Section 320, Subd. 3).
LAND ALTERATION - change in shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, fill,
etc. (City Code Section 320, Subd. 4).
The structure or work you are requesting is an activity on publicly owned lands. Structures like boat houses, patios,
sheds, etc. are all NONCONFORMING USES. It is the intent of the City to bring all these uses into conformance, which
means that those structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. All permits are
granted for a limited time and are non-transferable. Stairway construction must meet the State Building Code when the
permit is for new construction, or a new permit is applied for due to a change in dock site holder.
Please type or print legibly
APPLICANT Name ~ LK'~Q v",~~/'(~ / ~ G V~v~ ~
Phone(H) ~Z-~) (W) (M),
LEGAL Lot ~~e~-- ~0~ Block
DESC,
Subdivision
PID ~ Plat ~
ZONING DISTRICT ~-1~ R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3
Public Lands Permit Application
Page 1 of 2
Revised 03/20/02
-2254-
I PUBLIC Name
PROPERTY
Dock Site # Shoreline Type
Address
Phone (H). ,(W). _(U)
PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS)
DESCRIBE REQUEST & PURPOSE
Applicant's Signature~ Date
Public Lands Permit Application
Page 2 of 2
Revised 03/20/02
-2255-
Mour~ ~y Counca'M~uzes - Ju~y 24, ~
9. CENT~L BUSINESS DISTRICT PARKING PROGRAM
City Manager Hanson informed the coun~l.that this Parking program expired June 30,
that time.
MOTION by Meyer, s~nded by.Andersonto extend the CBD .Pa~ing Pm~am for
another year, to expire June 30, 2002. All voted in favor. MOtion carried.
A ten minute recess was taken from 9:25 to 9:35 p.m.
Mayor Meisel returned to preside over the rest of the meeting.
10. SKATE pARK TASK[ FORCE REC~UESTS
Jason Swensen, Mound POlice Officer and member of the Skate Park Task Force,
presented the selected logo and site plans for the proposed skate park. The Task Force
is asking for preliminary approval of the site located at the end of Maywood Road.
It was noted that catch basins and storm sewer extensions will be needed in this area to
accommodate the skate park. The Task Force is not asking for commitment on those
improvements at this time, only site approval.
~' MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Anderson that the city commit the land at the end of
~Maywood Road for the proposed Skate Park, and move to the next step of investigating
I~ costs for the needed drainage improvements. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
%11. ISLAND PARK TASK FORCE '
'~' Three applications were received for positions on the Island Park Task Force as a result
of the ad in The Laker. There will be a tOtral of 5-7 members on this task force.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Meyer to appoint Kenneth Neukircher, Tracy
Walstrom and Richard .Dissmore to serve on the Island Park Task Force. All voted in
favor. Motion carried. City Manager Hanson will contact these appointees.
12. ETHICS GUIDELINES
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Anderson to adopt the ethics guidelines as previously
used, but to drop the financial disclosure statement. Discussion followed, with City
Attorney John Dean suggesting some things to keep in mind. He feels that this is an
important decision and should be made only when a full Council is present. Also, the
other thing to keep in mind is how the Council may be perceived backing out of a
disclosure statement, rather than never having one. He also thinks the financial
disclosure statement serves a useful purpose, being a blanket statement to counter the
innuendos and rumors that Mound tends to produce. Filling out the financial disclosure
statement always gives a retort to the public and may impact the general perception of
City Government. With Mound being a closed community, Dean feels that it's important
5
-2256-
Peter Meyer gave the Council an update on his fund raiser and presented a check for
$1,000 to go towards the Lifeguard Program and Sr. Citizeqs.
$. SKATE PARK COMMITTEE REPORT
status of the skate park, They are in the process of organizing fund raisers for the
project.
6. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH GILLESPIE CENTER
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to enter into a cooperative agreement with the
Westonka Senior Foundation to furnish various services as spelled out in said
agreement. All voted in favor. Motion carded.
7. (REMOVED)
8. COMMERCIAL DOCK LICENSE REQUIREMENT FOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOC.
Councilmember Brown stepped down during this discussion because he is a property
owner at SeaHorse Condominiums.
MOTION by Meyer, seconded by Osmek to table this item until the next meeting to
allow for the City Attorney to do further investigation. All voted in favor. Motion carded.
9. ON-SALE LIC~UOR LICENSE FEES
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to set a public hearing for March 12, 2002, at
7:30 p.m. to consider raising liquor license fees for on-sale liquor licenses. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
10. SET SPECIAL MEETING WORKSHOPS
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to set the following special meeting workshops:
Facilities Study Update Workshop for February 19, 2002, at 7:00 p.m.; and Joint
meeting with the HRA on Redevelopment Recap for February 13, 2002, at 6:00 p.m. All
voted in favor. Motion carried.
11.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
AMM Fax news
Friday Fax
Correspondence: LMCD
FYI: Peter Meyer fundraiser clearance
Memo: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
FYI: Excerpts from the Delano Eagle on utility fees
Contact info for LMCD _respresentative
Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative
Save the Lake Recognition banquet registration
Correspondence: School Distdct
Metropolitan Council newsletter
3
-2257-
Mound C~ Council Minutes - February 27, 2001
SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR PURPOSES
OF CONSTRUCTING AN ADDITION ON
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4446
DENBIGH ROAD, PID
CBDG F~di~: for WECAN
Mayor MeiSel e~essed, her wish ~to see the budget for these funds.
Edith TraverS of WECAN will provide the budget for further
consideration.
MOTION by BrOwn, seconded by Anderson to continue this item until
fu~her budget information is received. All ayes.
J. Quisi.public sign permit for Upper Tonka Little League
K. RESOLUTION NO. 01-25: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING BONNIE
RI~ER AS ACTING CITY CLERK
4. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS
Andrea Ahrens came forward and stated that if She were still on the Council she
would have pulled item D on the consent agenda - approval for the Bass
Tournament. She stated no other city in the area will allow these tournaments,
and that's the reason they come to Mound. The park is taken away from the rest
of the public for this event, and there isn't even a fee charged. She was
informed that the Bass Tournament has donated $200 for the parks and the
stipulation is included that they are responsible for all clean-up and restoration of
the park to its odginal condition, and a January 24th resolution adopted a fee of
$150 for park use of similar type.
5. SKATE PARK PROJECT
Derek Hostetler and Dylan Wilbur represented the youth from the task force
working on location for a skate park. They reviewed the pros and cons of
different locations with the Council. Jason Swensen, Mound Police Officer and
member of the task force, also reviewed some options with the Council. It was
the consensus of the Council that City staff work on possible locations with the
task force. Meyer stated that he has been attending task force meetings and
Brown indicated that he would be willing to get involved also.
6_. WETLANDS CONSERVATION ACT NO-LOSS REqUEST,{BECKER)
City Attorney Dean reviewed the last action of the Council, being the suggestion
that the Becker reps and City reps get together to see if a compromise could be
reached. Since that meeting, extensive discussions along those lines have
resulted. There is a strong potential that a resolution can be reached, but there is
nothing in writing for consideration tonight. Dean continued by stating that the
-2258-
!
:1
I
I
RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made on this __ day of May, 2002, by and between the CITY
OF MOUND, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Owner"), and THE VILLAGE BY THE
BAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Village"),
I.
RECITALS
1.01 Owner is the fee simple owner of the real estate located within the City of Mound,
MN, which is legally described as Outlots B and C, Mound Visions 2nd Addition, Hennepin
County, Minnesota ("Property").
1.02 Village and Owner are parties to that certain Subdivision Agreement dated
January 8, 2002 (the "Contract") pursuant to which Village is responsible for the installation of
certain improvements on the Property, all as more fully described in the Contract.
1.03 Subject to the provisions of this Agreement, Owner desires to grant Village, and
the Village desires to secure the consent of Owner to enter the Property for the purpose of
installing such improvements on the Property.
1.04 It is understood that in executing this Agreement, Owner will not be granting (a)
any Permanent interest in the Property to Village; or (b) exclusive use or possession of the
Property to Village.
II.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and their mutual promises, the
parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1406021v2
-2263-
2.01 Right of Entry. Effective upon the date hereof, owner hereby grants to Village,
its agents, employees, contractors and invitees the right to enter upon the Property, for the
purpose of making and installing thereon all of the improvements required by it to be installed on
the Property and for the further purpose of storing materials, equipment and other items thereon
which are needed in connection with Village's development of the Subdivision.
2.02 Duration of Right of Entry. The right of entry shall expire on the earlier of the
date the Property is no longer needed for the purposes described in Section 2.01 herein or
November 15, 2003
2.03 Conditions. In consideration for such right of entry, Village agrees:
(a) to use the Property for only the purposes described herein;
(b) to do no unnecessary damage to the Property;
(c) to restore the Property to substantially the same condition as the condition in
which it was found by Village at the time of Village's entry upon the Property
pursuant to this Agreement (except for the addition of the installed
improvements); and
(d) to hold Owner harmless from and indemnify it from any and all claims, damages,
judgments or obligations, including the cost of defense of suit, arising out of liens
placed on the Property, damage to Property or arising out of injury to anyone
incurred or alleged to have been incurred in connection with or as a result of any
work done pursuant to this Agreement, or as a result of Village's intentional torts
or negligence.
2.04 Governing Law.
laws of the State of Minnesota.
This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the
1406021v2
-2264-
2.05 NOtiCes and Demands. All notices, demands or other cOmmunications under this
Agreement shall be effective only if made in writing and shall be sufficiently given and deemed
given when delivered personally, transmitted by facsimile, or mailed by certified mail, return
receipt requested, postage prepaid, properly addressed as follows:
If to Owner: City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Attn: Kandis M. Hanson, City Manager
If to Village: The Village By The Bay Development, LLC
1600 University Avenue, Suite 212
St. Paul, MN 55104-3825
Attn: Lawrence W. Olson, Vice President
Or to such other persons as the parties may from time to time designate in writing and
forward to the other persons entitled to receive notice as provided in this section.
2.06 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto only by
written instrument executed with the same procedures and formality as were followed in the
execution of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed
in their names and on their behalves on or as of the above date.
CITY OF MOUND
By:
Its: City Manager
THE VILLAGE BY THE BAY
DEVELOPMENT LLC
By:
Its: Vice President
1406021v2
-2265-
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT is dated this ~ day of ., 2002, by and
between the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ("City"), Mound Marketplace,
LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, ("Marketplace") and The Village by the Bay
Development, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Village") (collectively,
"Developer").
The agreement between the parties entitled Subdivision Agreement Mound Visions 2nd Addition
Subdivision, dated January 8, 2002 is hereby amended by amending section 26 thereof to read as
follows:
26.
Conveyance of Land. The trails will be located substantially as shown in the
document referred to in Section 4 C (1) of this Agreement. The easement for trails,
based on the actual location as constructed, shall be delivered to the City within 10
days following the City's acceptance of the trails as constructed. Unless extended by
agreement of the parties, the deed to Outlots B and C, shall be conveyed to the City
by May 16, 2002. All such conveyances shall be accompanied by a policy of title
insurance provided at Developer's expense, showing unencumbered marketable title
to the easements granted and the outlots conveyed. At the time of conveyance of the
trail easements, the Developer shall own such lands free of any liens or encumbrances
and the Developer shall provide the City with a policy of title insurance so stating.
In all other respects the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first
above written.
CITY OF MOUND
By: By:
Pat Meisel, Mayor
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
MOUND MARKETPLACE LLC.
By:
Its:
JBD-214345vl
MU220-5
1
-2266-
THE VILLAGE BY THE BAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC
By:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF ItENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
,2002, by Pat Meisel, Mayor, and Kandis Hanson, City Manager, of the City
of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the
authority granted by its City Council.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing
)
) ss
)
instrument was
2002, by
acknowledged before me this day of
, ., and
, a , on behalf of the said
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was
, 2002, by
acknowledged before me this day of
., ,and
_, a ., on behalf of the said
Drafted by:
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Notary Public
JBD-214345vl
MU220-5
2
-2267-
Thomas J. Campbell
Roger N. Knutson
Thomas M. Scott
Elliott B. Knetsch
Joel J. Jamnik
Andrea McDowell Poehler
Matthew K. Brokl*
*Also licensed in Wisconsin
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
Attorneys at Law
(651) 452-5000
Fax (651) 452-5550
May 3, 2002
John F. Kelly
Matthew J. Foli
Soren M. Mattick
Marguerite M. McCarron
Gina M. Brandt
Ms. Kandis Hanson
Mound City Manager
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Dear Ms. Hanson:
Enclosed for your review is WAFTA's grant application to the Departmem of Trade
and Economic Development (DTED) and two sample Resolutions that WAFTA is requesting
the City of Mound pass at their May 14th meeting. Greg Pederson will be at the meeting to
answer any questions posed by the City Council.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 651-234-6217.
Very truly yours,
Campbell Knutson
Professional Association
Soren M. Mattick
SMM:cjh
Enclosure
Suite 317 * Eagandale Office Center * 1380 Corporate Center Curve · Eagan, MN 55121
-2268-
14525 Highway 7
Minneapolis, Minnesota
(952) 935-1010 ° FAX (952) 935-1254
GIEOMATRIX
May 1, 2002
Project 007003.001.0
Department of Trade and Economic Development
Contamination Cleanup Grant Program
121 - 7th Place East
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Subject:
Contamination Investigation and RAP Development Grant Application
Western Area Fire Training Academy (WAFTA)
To whom it may concern:
On behalf of the Western Area Fire Training Academy (WAFTA) and the City of Mound,
MN, Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. has assisted with the preparation of a Grant Application for
Contamination Investigation and RAP Development funds from the Minnesota Department of
Trade and Economic Development. Please find attached an original and two complete copies
of the referenced Application. We have provided all requested information except for the
financial statement for the City of Mound and two separate Resolutions for 1) Approving the
Application by the City of Mound, and 2) Committing.the local matching funds for the
planned investigation and RAP development. As we discussed on the phone with your office,
these three documents are being prepared and are forthcoming.
The City of Mound, on behalf of WAFTA is submitting the attached Application to facilitate
the remedial investigation and ultimate development of the 20 acre WAFTA Site. The Site
has effectively remained unused since approximately 1990 due to actual and perceived soil
and groundwater contamination. Attempts to initiate investigation and cleanup by WAFTA
have not been fully successful due to a lack of adequate funds by WAFTA and disagreements
as to what entities are responsible for Site cleanup. The cursory investigations that have been
performed have identified but not quantified contamination at the Site.
It is likely that completion of the Site investigation will result not only in an approved
Response Action Plan but also an understanding among the potential responsible parties of the
ultimate responsibility for Site cleanup. This in turn will allow cleanup of the Site to proceed
and utilization of the Site to it's best and highest use, thereby generating property taxes and
multiple j obs.
In regards to the criteria that you will use to evaluate our Application we offer the following.
1)
The subject Site has had detectable concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOC), characteristic petroleum compounds and heavy metals. The VOC and metals
are at concentrations and distributed at the Site that suggests a high potential for
impacts to surface and ground waters at and in the vicinity of the Site. The Minnesota
Geornatrix Consultants, Inc.
Enclineers, Ge010Clists, and Environmental Scientists
P:\7003~IXProject\DTED Application letter 050102.doc
-2269-
Department of Trade and Economic Development
May 1, 2002
Page 2
GEOI~4ATRIX
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is concerned enough about the Site contamination
that they have threatened to move the Site from the Voluntary Investigation and
Cleanup (VIC) program to the Site Response Section (Superfund).
2)
The Site has been vacant for approximately 12 years. The Site is located in an area of
increasing property values and property transactions. A very successful Golf' Course
and residential properties are located adjacent to the Site. Currently the Site is exempt
from property taxes. Development of the Site, which will not occur until the Site is
cleaned up, will create jobs and will generate property taxes. The current development
plan calls for a staging of job creation at the Site, from an initial boat storage and
repair facility to an appliance repair industry with new construction above the existing
belowground warehouse-like structures. The unique nature of the Site makes the
proposed development the highest and best use of the former Nike Missile Silos.
3)
The property tax base will increase from zero to its highest potential based on the
current proposed development.
4) The investigation of the Site has stalled due to the lack of adequate funds.
5)
The cost to complete the Site investigation is currently estimated at approximately
$7,500/acre.
6)
Because of the unresolved responsibility issues at the Site, the availability of funds for
investigation has been limited. Resolution of these issues is expected as a result of the
completion of the investigation. The WAFTA is committed to completion of the
investigation and has been working towards this end for almost 5 years. The annual
dues show that each of the 11 WAFTA members have been fully committed to the
environmental matters during that time. WAFTA has successfully negotiated for
investigation assistance with the US Army Corp of Engineers. The WAFTA will be
also assessing their members at least twice the past annual dues, over the next few
years, to pay for the investigation.
We feel that this information reflects the need for DTED funds, the commitment of WAFTA
to finish the Site investigation and to facilitate the subsequent sale of the Site for development.
Please do not hesitate to call us if we can provide clarification to these matters or further
information.
P:\7003- I\ProjeetXDTED Application letter 050102.doc
-2270-
Department of Trade and Economic Development
May 1, 2002
Page 3
GEQMATRiX
Sincerely,
Geomatrix Consultants, Inc.
Christopher F. Thompson, P.E.
Principal Engineer
Attachment as noted
CC:
Ms. Kandis Hanson - City of Mound (w/o Appendices)
Mr. Soren Mattick - Campbell Knutson (w/o Appendices)
Mr. Greg Pederson - WAFTA (w/o Appendices)
P:\7003- l \Project\DTED Application letter 050102.doc
-2271 -
FY 02 - FY 03
~Trade & ~
Economic
Devdopment
Business & Community
Development
Contamination Investigation and RAP Development
Grant Application
Cover Page
Applicant: City of Mound
Head of Applicant Agency: Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Applicant Address: 5341 Maywood Road
City: Mound
Project Contact Person: Greg Pederson
Phone: 952-472-3555 Fax: 952-472-0620
E-mail: Moundfiredept~hotmail.com
Application Author/Preparer: Christopher F. Thompson, P.E.
Phone: 952-935-1010
E-mail: cthompson~geomatrix.com
Zip Code: 55364
Investigation
1
-2272-
FY 02 - FY 03
I. gITE INFORMATION
1. Name of Site: Western Area Fire Training Academy (WAFTA)
(Building name, location reference, etc,)
Site address: 1200 County Road 127
City (or Township): Watertown Township, Minnesota
County: Carver
Minnesota Legislative District # 34~_A B (circle correct)
If enrolled in an MPCA program: VIC Program I.D. # VP14790
LUST Program I.D.# 572
Other
2. If the site is located in the seven-county metropolitan area as defined in M.S. § 473.121, Subd. 2,
you must be participating in the Metropolitan Council's Local Housing Incentives Program to
qualify for a grant. Please attach a copy of your city council resolution required by the
Metropolitan Council indicating your election to participate in their program.
See Appendix A
3. Current property owner: City of Excelsior as a member and trustee for WAFTA
4. Property owner after cleanup and redevelopment: See Question #29
5. Name(s) of current environmental consultant and legal counsel if applicable
Consultant: Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. - Mr. Christopher Thompson Phone: 952-935-1010
Attorney: Campbell & Knutson, P.A. - Mr. Soren Mattick
Phone: 651-452-5000
6. Legal description of the site: SW ¼ of Section 12, T 117 N, R25W, Carver County, Minnesota.
See Attached Legal Description from Site Survey
Attach an accurate and legible site and location map showing locations of current prominent and
relevant site features such as buildings, retaining walls, etc. Also indicate where contamination
is suspected, and where furore development will occur. (Note: Site map shall include property
boundaries and a north arrow and bar scale). Photographs are very helpful.
See Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4 in Appendix B
8. Acreage of Site: 20.16
Sq. Ft. of Site: 878,170
Investigation
2
-2273-
FY 02 - FY 03
9. Zoning/Land use:
A. Current: Industrial
Mixed use
Commercial Residential
Other (specify): Agricultural
Assuming the site gets cleaned up, what the is expected zoning/land use:
Industrial: X Commercial: X Residential
Mixed Use Other (specify).
10. Current economic condition:
Vacant lot Developed site X
(explain below)
11.
If the site is currently developed with buildings but is not occupied, how long have the
buildings been vacant?
Vacant buildings since 1972 when use as a Nike missile base was discontinued - occasional
use since 1972 for training or vehicle storage.
II. SITE HISTORY
12.
Please attach a brief synopsis of the site. Explain why you think the site is contaminated and
give a general background/history of the activity on the site that may have caused or contributed
to the contamination.
See Attachment 1
III. CONTAMINATION INVESTIGATION INFORMATION
13. Current status of the investigation.
A. Is the site enrolled in the MPCA VIC Program? Yes
B. Has a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment been completed? Yes
If so, attach a copy of the Phase I to this report. Attached
C. Do you have an approved work plan to begin implementation of a Phase II? Yes, see
MPCA approval letter March 4, 2002 (Appendix C)
D. Has any of the work plan been implemented? No
Eo
Please provide copies of any approval and/or comment letters you have received from
the MPCA VIC Program and copies of any reports documenting investigation activities that
have been conducted to date.
See Appendix C for a summary of work associated with the Site since 1995. Results of
the work are presented in Appendix B.
14.
Briefly summarize the identified contamination at the site to date (identified compounds,
concentration, etc.), and the objective of the future planned investigation. If no soil or
groundwater samples have yet been collected at the site, indicate this.
See Attachment 2
Investigation
-2274-
FY 02 - FY 03
IV. COST ANALYSIS
BUDGET
15. What are the total investigation and RAP development costs?
$238,400
16.
How much are you requesting from DTED? (This amount cannot exceed $50,000 or 75%
of the total cost, whichever is less.)
$50,000
Complete the budget table below. If you have already completed a Phase I investigation, you may
include that cost in addition to the furore investigation & RAP development costs to be incurred.
BUDGET SOURCES & USES
Costs
Eligible Activities for Already Date Costs DTED Local Local
Investigation and RAP Match #1 Match # 2 Total
Incurred Incurred Request + Cost
+ =
Development Y / N
Y 3/95 2,500* 2,500
Phase I ESA
Preliminary Phase II Y 6/95-8/95 24,000* 24,000
Investigation
Y 11/96-2/99 17,400 17,400
Phase I/Phase II
Phase II Planning/Waste Y 1/01-4/02 19,000 19,000
Characterization
VIC Site Investigation Work Y 12/01-2/02 6,000 6,000 12,000
Plan
N 50,000 12,500 62,500 125,000
VIC Site Investigation
N 12,500 12,500 25,000
PAP Development
Y 1,750 1,750 3,500
MPCA Oversight
N 5,000** 5,000** 10,000
MPCA Oversight
Subtotals: 50,000 100,650 87,750
Total - Investigation & RAP Development: 238,400
* These costs are approxtmate as ortginal invoices cannot be located. ** Assumed MPCA oversight costs
FINANCING
17.
Please submit an audit, or financial statement if an audit is not available, from the municipality
in which the site is located.
See attached Mound Financial Statement
Investigation
-2275-
FY 02 - FY 03
18. Is there a possibility that the site will be investigated without government money? No
A. If. yes, what ~are the sources of fundingan.d dollar co-mmitmem from each?
Source
Funding Amount
$
$
$
B. If no, what efforts have been made to secure other funding? Attempts to negotiate with US
Army Corps of Engineers, Reliant Energy (former Minnegasco), and Xcel Energy (former NSP)
to secure their cooperation in sharing costs of investigation and cleanup.
LOCAL MATCH
19.
The applicant must pay for at least 1/4 of the investigation costs as a local match. Twelve
percent (12%) of the investigation costs must come from unrestricted funds (see letter B below).
The remainder of the local match can be financed with any other funds available to the applicant
(see letter C on following page). Follow the formula below to determine the amount of local
match required and eligible sources of those funds.
A. 1/4 of estimated investigation costs = $59,600 (this is the amount you must pay in local
match).
12% of estimated investigation costs = $28,608 (this amount must come from the
municipality's general fund, a property tax levy.for that purpose, or other unrestricted money
available to the municipality [excluding TIF]).
Source Amount
WAFTA Member Dues
(11 members * 1,200/yr in past)
$100,650
$
TOTAL
$100,650
Investigation
-2276-
FY 02 - FY 03
C. §ubtraet B. from A. from the previous page = $30,992. This is the remaining amount of the local
match that must be met. This money may come from TIF, regional, state, or federal money available
for the redeveloPment ofbrownfields or any other money available to the municipality.
Source Amount
US COE $ 87,750
(See Appendix D - Cost Sharing Agreement)
$
TOTAL $ 87,750
GRAND TOTAL (this should equal the local match in A.) $ "is greater than A"
V. SITE VALUE
20. What is the current assessed value of the site? $ 91,200 with structures (Carver County
Assessor)
21. What is the estimated assessed value of the site should contamination be found and
remediation completed? $ 355,000
What is the estimated assessed value of the site after redevelopment? $ -355,000
A. How were these figures determined? See Attachment 3
B. Who determined them? Preparer
VI. REDEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
22. Explain the likely use of the site after investigation and cleanup and how this was determined
(give examples of prospective developers, interested parties, zoning requirements, etc.).
See Attachment 4
23. If the site will be redeveloped for residential use, provide the following data:
TOTAL # OF RENTAL UNITS TO BE DEVELOPED
Monthly rental cost per unit $
Number of affordable units
Construction cost per unit $
TOTAL # OF OWNER-OCCUPIED UNITS TO BE DEVELOPED
Purchase price per unit/home $
Number of affordable units/homes
Construction cost per unit $
Investigation
-2277-
FY 02 - FY 03
24. Are there any third parties who have expressed interest in redeveloping the site? Yes
NOTE: If you answered affirmatively to this question you must fill out the third party
information on Page 9.
25. What are the current property taxes on the site? $ Tax Exempt
26. What are the projected property taxes for the site when the site is cleaned and developed? $ NA
JOB CREATION
27.
Project the number of new jobs created after cleanup and development of site (attach additional
pages if necessary). Are any jobs transferred from another Minnesota community or another
state? How many? From where?
JOB TABLE
Position Title Total # of Total # of Annual Expected
Full-time Part-time Wages Per Job Hiring Date
Jobs Jobs
Total Jobs -
JMS will generate a number of jobs once the site is utilized for storing boats and recycling
commercial appliances. JMS is still in the preliminary phase of negotiating with Carver County to
determine the size and scope of the allowable operations on the Site. When JMS has completed these
negotiations, a more detailed business plan will be prepared outlining the number of jobs these two
operations will create.
Investigation
-2278-
-2279-
I;Y U~- FY U3
VII. THIRD PARTY/COMPANY COMMITMENT INFORMATION
Third P~y/Comp~y Name: ~S Se~ices, Inc.
Contact Person: Jim Salter
Title: President
Phone Nmber (include ~ea code): 612-741-9000
~II. PAY~NT ~FO~TION
30. List below the appropriate i~o~ation to indicate where gr~t payments should be made.
Mailing Ad&ess: 5341 Maywood Road, Mo~d, ~ 55364
Contact Person: Greg Pederson ~
E-mail ad,ess: Mo~dfiredept~hotmail.com
Telephone Nmber (include ~ea code): 952-472-3555
F~ Nmber (include ~ea code): 952-472-0620
Mi~esota Identification Nmber: Mo~d = 8024096
State of Mi~esota vendor number: 03681100100
Federal Employer Identification Nmber: 416005396
Investigation
9
2280-
IX. RESOLUTIONS
3 i, Resolutions must ~ ado~otedpfior to submission of the applicat!0~ p~age.
The two required~
elements are:
1. A resolution from the governing body of the city where the project site is
located, which approves the application.
A. resolution from the applicant committing to the local match and authorizing
contract signatures. Note: pursuant to M.S. 412.201, Statutory Cities must
authorize both the Mayor and Clerk to execute all contracts.
An applicant may either provide a separate resolution for each of the above, or combine them into a
single resolution, as long as they include the same elements.
Blank resolutions are included as examples for your convenience. You may choose to reformat them,
but make sure to include all of the statements that appear in our examples.
RESOLUTION # 1- City Approving the Application
BE IT RESOLVED that the city of has approved the
City where site is located
Contamination Cleanup grant application submitted to the Department of Trade and Economic
Development (DTED) on , by
Date Applicant
for the site.
Site name
I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the city council on
Signed:
AUthorized Official
Date
Title:
Date:
Witnessed by: '
Title: Date:
Investigation
10
-2281 -
RESOLUTION #2, Committing LocalMatch and Authorizing- Contract Signature
BE IT RESOLVED that act as the legal sponsor tor project(s)
(Applicant) .
contained in the Contamination Cleanup Grant Program to be submitted on
(Day/Mo/Yr)
and that is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of
(Title of Authorized Official)
Trade and Economic Development for funding of this project on behalf of
(Applicant)
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that has the legal authority to
(Applicant)
apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure
adequate project administration.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sources and amounts of the local match identified in the
application are committed to the project identified.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that has not violated any
(Applicant)
Federal, State or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of
interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state,
may enter into an agreement with the
(Applicant)
State of Minnesota for the above-referenced project(s), and that
(Applican0
certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulation as stated in all contract agreements.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that is hereby
· (Title of Authorized Official)
authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project(s) on behalf of the
applicant. Note: Do not include the proper name, only the title of the official. AND, if the applicant is a
statutory city, two individual officials (titles only) must be authorized to sign agreements.
Investigation
11
-2282-
ATTACHMENTS
-2283-
Attachment 1
The site was originally undeveloped farmland, which was developed into a Nike Missile
battery by the United States government starting in approximately 1958. The Nike
missile battery was sold to the City of Excelsior as trustee for the Western Area Fire
Training Academy (WAFTA) in 1974. WAFTA used the site for fire training during the
period from 1977 to 1990. The property has been essentially vacant since 1990 except for
occasional use of the site for storage of vehicles.
The Nike Missile battery included three underground missile silo buildings and other
support buildings such as an electrical generator building (Building D), missile assembly
building (Building C), and warhead storage building (Building E). In addition, the site
had acid neutralization pits, cisterns, an aeration tank, and a wastewater treatment pond
used for treatment of wastes and wastewater. The use of various chemicals at the site
during this period has likely impacted soil and groundwater.
After the site was sold to WAFTA, an additional "smokehouse" building (Building F)
was constructed for use in fire training. Two above ground storage tanks used for diesel
fuel were present at the site during its use as a missile battery, and other underground
storage tanks (USTs) were also present at the site. Three USTs were removed in 1987
and an observed petroleum release was reported to the MPCA resulting in the MPCA
assigning leak #752 to the site. Some of the fire training activities and storage of
materials at the site likely resulted in impacts to soil and groundwater during this period.
Various cursory site investigations have been conducted during the period from 1987 to
the present and these are described in more detail in Attachment 2.
P:\7003-1 ~Project\dted Attachment 1 &2&3.doc
-2284-
Attachment 2
Contamination InVestigation Information
The site has been the subject of various cursory environmental investigations since 1987.
These include a "Contamination Evaluation Investigation" by Envirodyne Engineers in
1988, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment by Braun in 1994-1995, and a "Phase II
Environmental Site Assessment" by Baywest in 1995. The results of soil and
groundwater sampling conducted during these investigations are summarized on Figure 3
and Figure 4 of the Phase II Investigation Work Plan prepared by Geomatrix in January
2002 (included in Appendix A).
Operations at a typical Nike missile launch facility included storing, handling, and
disposal of fuel and explosives, cleaning solvents, paints, thinners, batteries, and other
products used for the operation and maintenance of the facility. Fire training operations
conducted by WAFTA included use of fuels and chemicals such as petroleum products
(leaded and unleaded gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel, propane), and methanol.
Contaminants of concern have been found in soils, groundwater, surface water, and
sediment at the site during previous investigations. These include petroleum
hydrocarbons (gasoline or diesel range organics), lead, and chlorinated volatile organic
compounds (Tetrachloroethene, Trichloroethene, Carbon Tetrachloride, and 1,1,1-
Trichloroethane). It has been recommended that an inspection of the site be conducted
for restricted wastes such as asbestos, mercury switches, and electrical equipment
containing PCBs.
P:\7003-1\Project\dted Attachment l&2&3.doc
-2285-
Attachment 3
(1984) and discussions with a nearby property owner and Real Estate Broker who lives
and works in the western suburbs of the Metropolitan area. The value of the 20.16 acres
after remediation was developed as follows:
Land $10,000/acre
= $201,600
Improvements (15,345 ft2) of office/warehouse space
[former Nike Missile Silos] x $10/ft2
= $153,450
Total $355,050
P:\7003-1\Project\dted Attachment l&2&3.doc
-2286-
Attachment 4
WAFTA is currently~_~egotiafi~.~the.sal, e_o£ ~e Site_with. Iim Salter:_Presidentof~IMS
services, Inc., a Minnesota Corporationl jMS Pians on Presenting WAFTA With a
Purchase Agreement by May 3, 2002.
The property is currently zoned agriculture and is limited to residential or agricultural
purposes. JMS is in the process of rezoning the Site to an industrial or commercial
district in order to erect several large storage facilities on the Site whereby JMS will
winterize and store recreational boats. It is anticipated that the storage facility would be
constructed above the three vacant missile silos. JMS also plans on developing a
remanufacmring/recycling center for commercial grade restaurant appliances by 2004.
This activity would take place in the empty silos.
P:\7003-1\Project\dted Attachment l&2&3.doc
-2287-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONTAMINATION
CLEANUP GRANT APPLICATION
FOR THE WESTERN AREA FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY (WAFTA)
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, has approved
the Contamination Cleanup Grant Application submitted to the Department of Trade and
Economic Development (DTED) on May 14, by the City of Mound for the Western Area
Fire Training Academy (WAFTA) site.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Councilmember
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of May, 2002.
and seconded by
Mayor Pat Meisel
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-2288-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-.~
RESOLUTION COMMITTING LOCAL MATCH AND AUTHORIZING
CONTRACT SIGNATURE FOR WESTERN AREA FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY
(WAFTA)
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the City of
Mound act as the legal sponsor for the project contained in the Contamination Cleanup
Grant Program to be submitted on ,2002, and that the Mayor and City Clerk are
hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Trade and Economic Development for
funding of this project on behalf of the City of Mound.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Mound has the legal authority to apply for
financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure
adequate project administration.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Mound has not violated any Federal,
State or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of
interest or other unlawful or corrupt practices.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state, the City
of Mound may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above
referenced project, and that the City of Mound certifies that it will comply with all
applicable laws and regulations as stated in all contract agreements.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on
behalf of the applicant.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Councilmember
and seconded by
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of May, 2002.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
-2289-
MOUND LIQUOR STORE
INTERIOR FINISHES
Main
2.
3.
4.
5.
e
7.
8.
9.
Floors:
Carpet and VCT flooring
Painted gypsum board walls
Painted exposed structure/ceiling
Metal halide high bay lights with accent lighting
Acoustic tile ceiling at wine area and office areas
Plastic laminate checkout cabinets
Wood racks for wine display
Metal shelves for liquor display
Lighted glass doors at cooler
Basement Level:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Sealed concrete floor
Concrete walls - painted
Convenience outlets
Fluorescent lights
HVAC drops for air circulation
Precast concrete ceiling
-2290-
7645 Lyndale Avenue South, # 100
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423
612.861.9636 Fax: 612.861. 9632
fmia r~hi~oe~c
0
~]
~>
cid
0
0
L i
I i
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
[_J
PURCHASE AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
5/9/02 draft
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this __ day of May, 2002, by and
between Mound Marketplace, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Seller") and the City
of Mound, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, or its assigns ("Buyer").
WITNESSETH:
1. Description of Store to Be Constructed and Property Sold. Seller, in consideration
of the covenants and agreements of Buyer hereinafter contained, hereby agrees to construct and
convey unto the Buyer, its successors and assigns, by contract for deed, accompanied by an abstract
of title or registered property abstract and Seller's affidavit, upon the prompt and full performance
by the Buyer of its part of this Agreement, a new municipal liquor store (the "Store") in the
proposed Mound Market Place, Mound, Minnesota, constructed in accordance with the plans and
specifications described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Plans and Specs"). The Store will
consist of the ground and building and all fixtures and equipment necessary to commence
operating a retail liquor store (exclusive of inventory and cash registers) (hereinafter referred to
collectively as the "Property"). The Store will be approximately 5,100 square feet on the main
level and 5,100 square feet on the lower level and will be attached to an approximately 32,600
square foot grocery store located at the Northwest Comer of County Roads 15 (Lynwood
Boulevard) and 110 (Commerce Boulevard). The Property is currently a portion of Lot 1, Block
1, MOUND VISIONS 2Nr) ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Buyer will have
exterior signage in an agreed-upon format consistent with the signage policy for Mound
Marketplace. Seller shall construct the Store in a first-class, workmanlike manner. In addition,
Seller timely construct and install, at Seller's sole expense, all common elements designated or
described in the Declaration and the CIC Plat (as hereinafter defined).
2. Purchase Price. Buyer, in consideration of the covenants and agreements of Seller,
hereby agrees to pay to Seller as and for the purchase price of the Property the sum of One Million
Two Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand and no/00 Dollars ($1,275,000.00), payable as follows:
(a)
One Hundred Ten Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($110,000.00) (the "Earnest
Money") upon execution of this Agreement, which amount shall be deposited
with the Chicago Title Insurance Company (the "Title Company") to be held as
provided Paragraph 15 of this Agreement;
(b)
One Hundred Ninety Thousand and no/00 Dollars ($190,000.00), in cash or
equivalent at Closing (as hereinafter defined)
(c)
The Remaining Nine Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand and no/100 Dollars
($975,000.00) shall be payable by Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Blank
Contract for Deed (except as herein provided) (the "Contract for Deed") as
follows:
LMW-202421 v4
MU200-96
(i)
(ii)
Three Hundred Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($300,000.00) upon
completion of fifty percent (50%) of the building shell of the Store.
Three Hundred Fifty Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($350,000.00) upon
1
-2293-
completion of one hundred percent (100%) of the building shell of the
Store.
(iii) One Hundred Fifty Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($150,000~00)upon
(iv)
completion of all tenant imprOvements and issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for the Store (hereinafter referred to as "Completion").
One Hundred Seventy Five Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($175,000.00)
with interest thereon from and after Closing at the rate of eight percent
(8%) per annum due on the later of June 1, 2003 and the date which is six
(6) months after Completion.
The Contract for Deed shall contain the following additional provisions:
(A)
Payment under (i) above shall be subject to a ten percent (10%) retainage
and payment under (ii) above shall be subject to a five percent retainage,
all of which retainage shall be paid with payment under (iii) above, subject
to Buyer's right to withhold for minor, punch list items in an amount equal
to 150% of the estimated cost of correction or completion.
(B)
Except as provided in (iv) above, no interest shall accrue under the
Contract for Deed; provided that during such times as Buyer is in default
under the Contract for Deed, interest shall accrue on delinquent amounts at
the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum.
(c)
All requests by Seller for progress payments shall be accompanied by a
certification by Seller's architect (and Buyer's architect, if any) that the
prescribed state of completion has been reached and lien waivers sufficient
to insure Buyer's interests.
(D)
Except as otherwise provided below, Seller shall retain all rights of
possession of the Property and all risk of loss shall be borne by Seller until
Completion, at which time possession of the Property shall be delivered to
Buyer. During the period of Seller's possession, Seller shall procure both
liability and builders' risk insurance in appropriate amounts naming Buyer
as an additional insured thereunder.
LM W-202421 v4
MU200-96
(E)
In the event that Completion does not occur by November 15, 2002, Buyer
shall not be obligated to make the payment required by subparagraph (iii)
above until the later of Completion and February 1, 2003. Without
limiting the foregoing, in the event that Completion does not occur by
February 1, 2003, Buyer shall have the right to both (1) offset against the
all remaining amounts due under the Contract for Deed any and all
amounts incurred by Buyer for occupancy costs (including rent) relating to
Buyer's retaining its current municipal liquor store in its current location
(or a substitute location), and (2) upon written notice to Seller, exercise the
remedy of self-help and complete the Store itself (Seller hereby granting
Buyer a non-revocable license to enter the Property, use the Plans and
Specs, and Seller's construction contracts for such purpose) and offset an
amount equal to one hundred ten percent (110%) of the costs of such self-
2
-2294-
help against all remaining amounts due under the Contract for Deed.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the February 1, 2003 date in the preceding
sentence shall be.~iequitably extendec/:by reason of~(x)~asualty--or--fire
............ which substantiatlydamages'the-'-Prop~erty; 'or (y)-'¢harrges-in the-Pla]xsm~rd-
Specs required by the Buyer.
(F)
The Contract for Deed will provide for a one hundred eighty (180) day
cancellation period.
(G)
Seller agrees and acknowledges that as long as Buyer owns the Property,
the Property shall not be assessed any portion of the costs of Improvement
Project (Mound Visions 2nd).
Seller shall have the fight to collaterally assign the Contract for Deed to
Associated Bank and Buyer shall execute any instruments reasonably
required in connection with such assignment.
(I)
The provisions of Paragraph 1 and the provisions of this Paragraph 2 shall
be incorporated into the Contract for Deed.
3. Contract for Deed. It is agreed that the Contract for Deed executed and delivered by
Seller to Buyer at the Closing (accompanied by all customary affidavits and certificates) shall be
subject only to the following exceptions:
(a) Building 'zoning and platting laws, ordinances and state and federal
regulations;
(b) Reservation of any minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota;
(c) Utility and road easements of record that do not interfere materially with the
use or development of the Property by Buyer as disclosed by visual inspection of the
easement on the Survey;
(d) The Declaration and CIC Plat (provided that such instruments shall comply
with the provisions of Paragraph 5 hereof);
(e) Any lien, claim or encumbrance incurred or suffered by Buyer.
Said Deed shall be accompanied by all required well disclosure.
4. Taxes and Special Assessments. Seller shall pay all real estate taxes, interest and
penalties, if any, and all installments of special assessments relating to the Property due and payable
in the year prior to the year of Closing and the years prior thereto. Seller and Buyer shall prorate all
taxes due in the year of Closing as of the Date of Closing. Seller shall be responsible for all Green
Acres and other taxes due as a result of the sale of the Property and all levied or pending special
assessments. Seller agrees and acknowledges that that as long as Buyer owns the Property, the
Property shall not be assessed any portion of the costs of Improvement Project (Mound Visions
2nd).
LMW-202421 v4 3
MU200-96
-2295-
5. Common Interest Community. As soon as available, Seller shall provide to
B_tryer~mBuye~iew_and_appro~alMra~s~lLa_propo~ed declarafion4the "Defilaratio~d
proposed condominium plat containing the Property (the "CIC Plat"), which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld. The Store shall be one of two (2) units comprising a common interest
planned community, the other unit consisting of the remainder of Mound Market Place. The
association for the community (the "Association") shall maintain the exterior of all structures
and all common areas. All Association costs shall be allocated based upon square footage of
building space, except that basement square footage used solely for storage shall not be counted.
The Declaration shall permit Buyer to place signage in the common area having such size, location,
and type as reasonably approved by Buyer. No exclusive or reserve parking rights shall be
granted. No unit owner shall have the right to subdivide its unit. The Buyer shall waive the
statutory disclosures and warranties under Chapter 515B. During such time as the Buyer owns
the Store, the Association's board of directors shall at all times consist of three (3) members, one
of which is the Manager of the City of Mound. No amendment may be made to the CIC's
constituent documents, including the declaration, without unanimous consent of all unit owners
(which consent Buyer shall not unreasonably withhold) with respect to, among other provisions,
sale or encumbrance of common area, a substantial alteration to the common area materially
adverse to Buyer's Unit (including permanent reduction in the number of parking space or
permanent elimination of access), capital expenditures in excess of $100,000.00, and the
aforementioned provision regarding membership on the board of directors. In the event that the
Declaration is not approved by Buyer by May 14, 2002, or in the event that the CIC Plat is not
approved by Buyer by June 15, 2003, either Buyer or Seller shall have the option to terminate
this Agreement within five (5) business days thereafter, in which event the Earnest Money shall
be refunded to Buyer, this Agreement shall be null and void and neither party shall have any
further liability hereunder. With respect to either the Declaration or the CIC Plat, letters of
approval from Buyer's counsel or attachment of such instrument to this Agreement as an exhibit
shall constitute the requisite approval hereunder.
6. Restrictive Covenant. At Closing, Seller shall execute and record a restrictive
covenant providing that as long as the Store is being operated as an off-sale liquor store, no other
portion of Mound Market Place shall be permitted to conduct the off-sale selling of alcoholic
beverages of any kind, including wine and beer. The foregoing restriction shall be contained in a
recorded restrictive covenant enforceable by both the Association and the Buyer.
7. Option to Purchase. At Closing, Buyer shall execute a recordable instrument
granting Seller (or its successor or assigns) an option to purchase the Store for fair market value
which may be exercised for a specified period of time after the Buyer elects to sell the Store. If
the holder of the option fails to timely exercise the option and the Buyer sells the Store to a third
party for the fair market value, the option shall terminate; provided, however, that if Buyer elects
to sell the Property to a third party for a purchase price less than fair market value (or if fair
market value has not been determined as provided herein) (hereinafter referred to as the "Other
Terms"), Buyer shall have a right of first refusal, exercisable within fifteen (15) days after notice
by Buyer to Seller of the Other Terms, to purchase the Property on the Other Terms. If Seller
shall timely exercise such right of first refusal, Seller shall buy and Buyer shall sell the Property
on the Other Terms; otherwise, such right of first refusal shall terminate and Buyer shall have the
right to sell the Property to the third party on the Other Terms free and clear of any rights or
interests of Seller. Fair market value shall be determined by means of two (2) appraisers, one of
LMW-202421 v4 4
MU200-96
-2296-
which shall be appointed by Seller and one of which is appointed by Buyer. In the event that the
two (2) appraisals differ by less than ten percent (10%), fair market value shall be the average of
~ two (2)_appraisa!s; OthermJ. sle,~theJav~-(2) appraisers shall-select-a_~ird-appraiseravhose
appraised value shall constitute fair market value.
8. Examination of Title. Seller shall, within thirty (30) days after the date hereof,
furnish Buyer a commitment for title insurance from the Title Company reasonably acceptable to
Buyer committing to insure Buyer in the amount of the purchase price hereunder. Buyer shall be
allowed thirty (30) days after receipt of the commitment and the Survey and the making of any
objections thereto, said objections to be made in writing or deemed to be waived. The Seller shall
use its best efforts to make such title marketable within six (6) months from its receipt of Buyer's
written objection. Pending correction of title, the payments hereunder required shall be postponed,
but upon correction of title and within ten (10) days after written notice, Buyer shall perform as
provided in this Agreement. If said title is not marketable and is not made so within six (6) months
from the date of written objections thereto as above provided, Buyer may either
(i) terminate this Purchase Agreement by giving written notice by registered
mail to Seller, in which event this Purchase Agreement shall become null and void and
neither party shall be liable for damages hereunder to the other party and the Earnest Money
shall immediately be returned to Buyer; or
(ii) elect to accept title in its unmarketable condition by giving written notice by
registered mail to Seller, in which event the warranty deed to be delivered at Closing Date
shall except such objections.
9. Survey. Seller shall procure, at its sole expense, and deliver to Buyer a survey of the
Property prepared by a registered land surveyor (the "Survey"). If the Title Company is willing to
grant Buyer a survey endorsement, the Survey need not meet ALTA requirements.
10. Default. If Seller, through no fault of Buyer, defaults in its obligations hereunder in
any manner, Buyer may, by notice upon Seller, (i) terminate this Purchase Agreement or (ii) avail
itself of an action for specific performance. If Buyer shall default in the performance of any of its
obligations hereunder, then Seller shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement upon 30 days written
notice to Buyer pursuant to Minn. Stat. §559.21 as Seller's sole remedy for said breach and no party
hereto shall have any further claim against the other hereunder. In such event, Buyer shall provide
Seller with its quit claim deed.
11. Representations and Warranties by Seller and Buyer. Seller represents and warrants
to Buyer that:
(a) There is no action, litigation, investigation, condemnation or proceeding of
any kind pending against Seller or the Property which could adversely affect the Property,
any portion thereof or title thereto. Seller shall give Buyer prompt written notice if any such
action, litigation, condemnation or proceeding is threatened or commenced prior to the
Closing Date.
(b) To the best of Seller's knowledge, except as disclosed in the reports referred
to in Paragraph 16 hereof, the Property has not been used for the generation, transportation,
LMW-202421 v4 5
MU200-96
-2297-
storage, treatment, or disposal of any hazardous waste, hazardous substance, pollutant, or
contaminant, including petroleum, as defined under federal, state or local law.
(c) If there is a well located on the Property; Seller will provide at Closing a well
disclosure. There are no underground storage tanks located on the Property. There is no
septic system located on the Property unless Seller has disclosed the same to Buyer.
(d) To the best of Seller's knowledge, there has been no dumping or deposit of
construction or other debris on the Property.
(e) The Store shall be constructed in a first-class, workmanlike manner, fi'ee and
clear of all liens or other encumbrances.
Buyer hereby represents and warrants to Seller that the Buyer has under its control at least
$1,100,000.00 in bond and other proceeds invested with maturities of less than one (1) year and
such funds will be timely available as needed to meet Buyer's obligations hereunder.
The parties hereby agrees that each of the foregoing representations and warranties shall
survive closing hereunder and that the breach of any thereof shall constitute a default, whether said
breach occurs prior to or after Closing, entitling the non-breaching party to exercise any remedy
provided to said non-breaching party in this Agreement or as provided by law in the event of a
default hereunder. In addition, if any of the foregoing warranties or representations shall be
breached or shall be untrue, the breaching party shall indemnify and hold the non-breaching party
harmless from any damages or liabilities relating thereto.
12. Closing. The closing ("Closing") of this transaction shall take place on the date that
is five (5) business days after approval of the CIC Plat by Hennepin County, provided that in the
event such approval is not forthcoming by August 1, 2002, either party may terminate this
Agreement by written notice to the other, in which event the Earnest Money shall be refunded to
Buyer and neither party shall have any further liability hereunder. At closing, Seller and Buyer shall
deliver to one another the instruments specified herein. Possession of the Property shall be delivered
to Buyer on the Closing, subject to Seller's obligation to construct the Store as provided in the
Contract for Deed.
13. Notices. All notices provided herein shall be given in person or be sent by United
States mail, either certified or registered, postage prepaid, to Seller c/o Metroplains, Inc., Attention
Larry Olson and Brian Pellowski, 4969 Olson Memorial Highway, Golden Valley MN 55422,
and to Buyer at City of Mound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364, Attention Kristin
Hanson. If notice is given by registered or certified mail, deposit in the United States mail of said
notice on or before the date such notice is to be given shall be deemed timely and acceptable.
14. Broker. Seller and Buyer represent and warrant to each other that they have
not engaged any real estate broker in connection with Seller's sale of the Property. Each party shall
defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other party from any claims of any broker claiming
through such party.
15. Earnest Money.
account held by the Title Company.
LMW-202421v4
MU200-96
The Earnest Money shall be deposited in an interest-beating
All interest shall follow the principal. At Closing, the Earnest
6
-2298-
Money shall be applied to the purchase price. In the event of termination of this Agreement as
provided herein for any reason other than default by Buyer, the Earnest Money shall be refunded by
--~h~-T4fl e-C~m p an y~to-kluy~r _
In the event of termination of this Agreement by reason of Buyer's default, notwithstanding
the provisions of Minn. Stat. §559.21, that portion of the Earnest Money equal to Seller's Costs (as
hereinafter defined) shall be disbursed by the Title Company to Seller and the remainder shall be
disbursed to Buyer. "Seller's Costs" shall mean the those costs incurred by Seller in construction
of the basement of the Store prior to termination of this Agreement. Upon written demand by Seller
to the Title Company and Buyer for payment of Seller's Costs, accompanied by Seller's
substantiation thereof, the Title Company shall disburse the amount of such demand unless within
three (3) business days after receipt of such demand by Buyer and the Title Company, Buyer shall
provide written notice of objection to such demand to Seller and the Title Company, in which.case
the Title Company shall retain such disputed amounts until joint written direction of Seller and
Buyer or other of a court of competent jurisdiction. In the event of a dispute under this
subparagraph, the dispute shall be subject to binding arbitration by an architect mutually-agreeable
to Seller and Buyer, the decision of which shall be binding on Seller and Buyer.
16. Reliance Letters. At or before Closing, Seller shall, at its sole expense, procure
and deliver to Buyer reliance letters addressed to Buyer regarding the Phase I Environmental Site
Assessments, prepared by STS Consultants, Ltd., STS Project 97660-XA, dated February 7, 2000,
and STS Project 98075XA, dated January 23, 2001, in the form of the letters addressed to Seller
dated April 10 and 11, 2002.
17. Miscellaneous. The terms, covenants, indemnities and conditions of this Purchase
Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the
respective parties hereto, and shall survive the Closing Date. Time is of the essence of this
Agreement. Buyer shall have the right to assign its rights under this Purchase Agreement.
LMW-202421 v4 7
MU200-96
-2299-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first
above written.
SELLER:
Mound Marketplace, LLC
BUYER:
The City of Mound
By.
Larry Olson
Its Chief Financial Officer
By
Its
By
Its
The undersigned hereby agrees to hold the Earnest Money and to disburse the Earnest Money as
provided in this Agreement.
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
By
hs
LMW-202421 v4 8
MU200-96
-2300-
EXHIBIT A TO PURCHASE AND CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
KKE~_rchite as-fo ~i tding- arrdmit e- improvem-e ntsTdarert Cop ~ 2
Anderson-Urlacker Engineers for structural, dated May 1, 2002
Tusche-Montgomery Architects for leasehold improvements, dated May 14, 2002
LMW-202421 v4 9
MU200-96
-2301 -
FAX: (~§P) ~?P-OSPO
WEB: www,ciiyo~mound.com
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES STUDY GROUP
RECOMMENDATION FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND
ARCHITECT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY.
MAY 10, 2002
The committee recommends securing the services of Amcon as the Construction
Management firm based on:
· The strong credentials of Todd Christopherson, President, who made the
presentation to the committee, along with the Superintendent, Bill Kline.
· Mr. Christopherson and Mr. Kline have worked together for sixteen years on
projects of this size and type.
· Costs were clear and competitive.
· References received and letters of recommendation were positive.
· Mr. Christopherson reassured the committee that this would be a priority project
for their firm and he assures that it will be completed on time.
· Successful Construction Manager for other public safety facilities in the area.
The committee recommends securing the services of Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. for
the position of Architect for the following reasons:
· Technical expertise and familiarity with the project- have been involved in the
initial space needs planning process.
· Architectural costs are competitive.
Mr. Miles Britz will serve as the Senior Project Architect and assures the
committee that SEH has the resources available to expedite this project and
complete it in a timely manner.
' printed on recycled paper
-2302-
· City staff has experienced a good working relationship in the past with SEH, Inc.
~-he City received seven proposals fr°m Construction Management firmS and eight
from Architectural firms The Public Safety Study Group chose six of the top firms and
reviewed presentation proposals from three construction management firms and three
architectural firms. It is of utmost importance in this project that the construction
management firm and architect work closely as a team to accomplish this project in a
timely and cost effective manner. The Group will spend the next few days meeting with
the top two recommended firms to assure complete compatibility. It should be noted
that the three architectural firms were very close in their ability to accomplish this
project. The committee feels that any of the three would be successful in providing the
services needed for this project.
Upon completion of a thorough review, the Study Group recommends hiring Amcon and
SEH, Inc. for this important project.
-2303-
CiTY OF MOUND
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound.com
INTERVIEWS
PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY
MOUND, MINNESOTA
Thursday, May 9, 2002
Construction Management Firms
8:15
Kraus-Anderson
9:30 Amcon
10:45 Bossardt
Alternate: E&V
12:00
Decision over Lunch
Architectural Firms
1:15 BKV
2:30 SEH
3:45 Bueltow
5:00
Alternate: Collaborative Design Group
Decision
t printed on recycled paper
-2304-
Interview panel should supply Bonnie with first, second and
third p!~_ce c~ndJd~tes for CM ~nO. ~rch~tec~. She will c~!! ~nd
project, dropping to the next party on the list should a firm
decline. Bonnie will write the recommendation on behalf of the
Facilities Study Group which will be included in packet along
with the supporting information for two firms being
recommended. Bonnie should set up interviews with the two
finalists and me for any time Monday, May 13. (I will pass on
an interview with SEH, should they be selected.) They should
attend the City Council meeting and meet the Council on May
14.
Motions on the agenda: Action on resolution authorizing staff
to enter into an agreement for construction management
services for the public safety facility project. Action on
resolution authorizing staff to enter into an agreement for
architectural services for the public safety facility project.
Resolutions will be drafted by Bonnie and included in packet.
Bonnie should ask the two firms to bring their proposed
contracts along to the Council meeting, if possible. Gino
should send copies with John Dean for his review. Gino should
fax copies to our liability insurance firm for their comments.
Tip: The CM should have professional liability coverage for at
least one year after occupancy. Gino should fax a copy to
Mary Ippel at Briggs and Morgan for her opinion. Tip: The
builder's risk insurance should only cover the cost of the
building, not the total cost of the project.
The first PS Project Team meeting is Wed, May 16, at 4:30
p.m. They can attend at their own risk. The contracts will not
be signed until all the review is completed and all the details
are negotiated.
-2305-
THIS PAGE
IS
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
-2306-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO, 02-
RESOLUTION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER AN
AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City received proposals for Construction Management Services for the
proposed public safety building on May 6, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the Public Safety Facilities Study Group has examined and considered said
proposals; and
WHEREAS, the Study Group conducted interviews with the perceived top three
candidates for the Construction Management Firm; and
WHEREAS, after tabulating and considering the information received at these
interviews the Study Group recommends securing the services of Amcon, 200 West
Highway 13, Burnsville, MN, to serve as the Construction Management Firm for the
Public Safety Facility,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, to hereby direct and authorized the City Manager to execute a contract for
Construction Management services with Amcon, 200 West Highway 13, Burnsville, MN,
55337, based on the approved proposal, but subject to review and approval by the City
Attorney and the City's insurance carrier.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Councilmember
and seconded by
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of May, 2002.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
-2307-
THIS PAGE
IS
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
-2308-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
RESOLUTION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER AN
AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City received proposals for Architectural Services for the proposed
public safety building on May 6, 2002; and
WHEREAS, the Public Safety Facilities Study Group has examined and considered said
proposals; and
WHEREAS, the Study Group conducted interviews with the perceived top three
candidates for the Architectural Firm; and
WHEREAS, after tabulating and considering the information received at these
interviews the Study Group recommends securing the services of Short Elliott
Hendrickson, Inc., Butler Square Bldg, 100 North 6th Street, Minneapolis, MN, to serve
as the Architectural Firm for the Public Safety Facility,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, to hereby direct and authorized the City Manager to execute a contract for
Architectural Services with Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc., based on the approved
proposal, but subject to review and approval by the City Attorney and the City's
insurance carrier.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Councilmember
and seconded by
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of May, 2002.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
-2309-
THIS PAGE
IS
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
-2310-
March 27, 2002
To: Kandis Hanson
City Manager and City Council
From: Greg Skinner
Public Works
Subject:
2001 Annual Report
Street Department
The street department's primary function is to maintain and repair the Cities
streets and storm sewers. The
City has 5 full time employees in the street department. I have listed the names
of the personnel below.
NAME TITLE
Don Heitz
Tim Johnson
Dan Grady
Frank Heitz
Lee Giese
Equipment Operator
Equipment Operator
Equipment Operator
Equipment Operator
Equipment Operator
The street maintenance supervision is handled mostly by myself. I delegate
certain project or tasks to each employee. Examples would be sealcoating; Don
will prepare the streets and work with the contractor. Sign repair, Dan and Lee
will replace, repair, and order signs. Street sweeping, Tim will schedule and
complete the 2 sweeping per year. Frank will repair and schedule maintenance
of the equipment. I handle all question and complaints and try to resolved them.
Some of my other duties include reports, budget preparation, supervising
-2311 -
personnel, evaluations, emergency call outs, construction meetings, project
inspections, purchasing of road materials, etc.
The following is a list of duties and tasks for the street department. Please keep
in mind that this covers repair and maintenance for over 50 miles of roads, 12
parking lots, 27 cul-de-sacs, and 11 miles of sidewalks.
Plowing and sanding, sweeping, clearing street right-of-way of brush, trees limbs,
maintenance of storm sewer, street sign repair and installation; curb and
sidewalk repair and snow removal, street lights, maintenance of equipment;
banners and Christmas decorations.
It's my responsibility to determine when we plow and sand the streets. I depend
on the national weather service, local weather reports, computer images and the
police department for information concerning any weather system that is moving
in our direction. Most of the time I am out checking the street to determine if and
when we will start plowing and sanding~ If at all possible I willwait-un~il it stops- .......................
snowing before we go out to plow. If we have ice conditions we will be out as
soon as possible. When we plow everyone is out.. We have 5 single axle truck
that have front plows, right side wings, and sanders. We have 5 four-wheel
drives with plows and 2 skid-steers, 1 has a plow and 1 has a snow blower for
the 11 miles of sidewalk. This year was not a typical winter. Below average snow
and above normal temps. The early part of spring we start our right-of-way repair
and maintenance. This includes repair of water main break patches, tree
trimming, hanging of the summer banners, storm sewer cleaning and street
sweeping. The street sweeping is a big and time consuming job. We have 2
street sweepers, one sidewalk broom, 2 trucks to haul, and 1 tanker. We sweep
everything. This task takes 3 to 4 weeks after a normal winter of sanding. When
this completed we start to get ready for the seal-coating project ( which will not
happen this year) and any other street repairs that are needed. This last spring
and summer saw no real damage or delays from sever storms.
The city storm sewer system is a very large system. I am unsure how many miles
of pipe there is. We have 370 catch basins and 81 sump catch basins. We clean
these once every year and clean the sumps twice every year. We will repair as
much as we can but the larger repairs have to contracted out. Each year we try,
if funds are available, to do some repairs. With the new storm water fee's that we
will start receiving in the year 2001 we will be able to do more repairs and
upgrades.
The cities street sign systems is still a mess. However, we now have an official
street sign map and will start to fix the problem in 2002.
Every year I try to repair as much sidewalk as possible. On an average I will
replace 10 sections and about 100 feet of curbing.
-2312-
The street department budget was over 7.5% for the year. Items that caused this
overrun are as followed.
Motor fuels
Shop materials
I::quipment parts
Street materials
Professional services
$5,000
$2,600
$5,000
$8,000
$11,000
2Carlson equipment for skid-steer $11,000
Public Utilities - Water and Sewer
distribution and the other being sanitary sewer collection. The water department
has 2 full time employees. We sell water to approximately 3500 customers. The
city has 4 wells, one booster station and combine storage of 575,000 gallons in 2
towers and 1 standpipe. We have approximately 45 miles of water main. We are
all so
Interconnected to the city of Spring Park at the Seton Bridge and we have 2
interconnection with the city of Minnetrista.
Chris Pounder and Mike Anderson work in the water department. Both read,
repair, and install water meters, water and sewer inspection and do locates for
utilities. Chris and Mike are new employees are in the process of learning the
water and sewer system.
The Public Utilities are operated like a business. Revenues are generated from
the sale of water, meter sales, and service charges. Salaries, benefits, and
operating expenses are paid from the revenues we receive. The water
department works closely with the inspection department, city engineer, and city
planner on new construction, new development, utility upgrades or new
installations. This includes site and plan review and inspection along with
discussions with the developers.
There are 2 budgets prepared for Public Utilities, 1 for the water department and
1 for the sewer department. The water departments budget for 2001 was
$478,00.00. The sewer departments budget for 2001 was $948,000.00. Line
item expenses do not vary much from year to year. The biggest percent of
increases every year come from capitol outlay, workers compensation, liability
insurance, and met council for sewer charges.
-2313-
The MPCA requires that the city has at least one full time employee with a class
C certificate in water supply operations. The city is also required to have one full
time employee with a class D certificate in wastewater operation. Each
employee, this also include Joyce, is sent to either water or sewer schools every
year. Certificates are renewed every three years. In addition they are sent to
various 1-day schools, training seminars, and conference. Two years ago we
hired the independent company Safe-Assure to keep us in compliance with
OSHA standards and regulation. This training is done once every other month.
What happen in 20017
For 2001 we had 20 water main breaks. No major repairs were needed. Every
year we have our water towers inspected. They check the condition of the
coating and~anedes~inside-t~he-towe~rs. This year~,we need~ecl~e ~reptaee~seme
These anodes-prolong the life or ' . I mentioned earlier the
city has 4 wells. We did not have any major expenses this year. We also are
nearing the end of our copper testing for the MN Health Department. This has
been a long and time-consuming process. One note on this, there is no health
threat to the customer. We still need to work out a few bugs. Every year we flush
the water system twice. We do this in the spring and fall. We this between
9:00pm and 5:30am. This reduces the chances of creating rust problems to the
customer. For the year we pumped 310,000,000 gallons of water, The year-end
budget came in 3% over.
The Sewer Department has 3 full time employees. Damon Hardina has been
with the city since 1994. Scott Kivisto has been with the city since 1985. Al
Kestner was moved from the water department. Scott and Al work on the sewer
line and storm sewer maintenance. They are responsible for maintaining 31
sewer lift stations, well pumps, and sewer line cleaning, and televise the sewer
and stormsewer lines. Lift stations are checked twice a week. They perform
pump repair, electrical repairs, pump removal, and seal replacement. Any major
repairs are sent out. During the warm weather months they will spend time
cleaning sewer lines with the jet-vac. We try to get 40,000 to 50,000 feet cleaned
per year. This year we started to televise our sewer lines with a camera set-up
that we purchased. This will allow us to repair and replace any sewer line that
has I/I more quickly than in the past. With the jet-vac and camera we can work
year-round. To the insurance company this is a very important factor for
determining liability. They have given us a timetable that they say we should
meet. We have 60 miles of sewer main in the city. They want us to complete the
cleaning of the lines every 4 years. That would mean we need to clean about
80,000 feet per year. I feel that we will be able to meet this goal. The sewer
department was 2.25% under budget.
-2314-
5431 Mayw00d Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Re: Planning and Building InSpection Department Annual Report
On behalf of the Planning and Building Inspection Department, I am pleased to provide the
annual report for 2002 for the City Council' s review and consideration.
PEP_SQNNEL
Perhaps the most significant changes in the Planning and Building Inspection Department in
2001 involved its personnel. Specifically, Jill Norlander was hired in February 2001 as the new
Administrative Assistant and the position of Community Development Director was
established and filled in August 2001. Lastly, Building Official Jon Sutherland left his position
in October 2001 to accept a similar job with the City of Albertville.
Support building inspection services were provided from Metro West Inspections and John
Breitner (plumbing) in 2001. Metro West also served as the City's interim building inspector
following Jon Sutherland's departure until the hiring of Building Official Matt Simoneau in
April 2002. Matt previously served as a Building Inspector for the Cities of Blaine and
Minneapolis and began his duties on April 29, 2002. He is certain to be a welcome addition to
the City of Moundl
2001 BUILDING PERMIT SUMMARY
The summary of the building permit activity in the City of Mound for 2001 has been included
as a separate attachment.
The City experienced a significant increase in roofing and siding permit activity in 2001 which
can be directly attributed to the June 2001 storm which damaged many homes in the City of
Mound and surrounding areas.
Two (2) significant residential projects were approved in 2001 which substantially added to the
City's housing inventory including Langdon Bay which added (73) lots and Village by the
Pond which added (99) residential units. To date, approximately (25) building permits have
been issued in Langdon Bay and two (2) building permits totaling seven (7) units have been
issued in the Village by the Pond project.
-2315-
It is anticipated that the building permit for the retail component of the MetroPlains project
(Mound Marketplace) will be issued in the next few weeks. Additionally, work on the new
Mound Post Office is expected to begin within the month.
PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINIS~TION
2001 Planning Commission Cases. A total of (45) land use applications were reviewed by
the City of Mound in 2001. A summary of the Planning Commission land use cases for 2001
has been included as a separate attachment. Listed below is a summary of the specific cases that
were reviewed and prepared in-house:
· Cli~'_&m__~_._~:dmem ~'26~2 Commo2_ece-'Bou!ev~dytM._~_--hogEnS~'Bay) ......
Variance - 3001 Brighton Boulevard (Anderson)
· Vacation - Block 3, Shirley Hills Unit F (Willette/WWT Partners)
· Variance- 2548 Avon Drive (Gables)
Variance - 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard (Hudak)
·
· Variance- 5993 Bartlett Boulevard (Peterson)
· Variance - 3022 Bluffs Drive (Schultz)
· Variance (Executive Report) - 3033 Brighton Boulevard (Milton)
To assist with review of land use applications, City staff has implemented a multi-department
review procedure as well as the preparation of an Executive Summary to provide an overview
for the City Council which documents the details associated with the Planning Commission's
review and recommendation of each land use application.
PUBLIC LANDS PERMITS
The Planning and Building Inspections Department provides support to the Parks and Public
Works Departments regarding the review of Public Lands Permit applications including the
preparation o£reports.
City staff anticipates that the Public Lands Permit Procedure Manual will be updated in 2002 in
cooperation with the Parks Department to reflect changes to City Code Chapter 320 which were
authorized and approved in 2000.
-2316-
COMPLAINTS AND ORDINANCE VIOLATIONS
The Planning and Building Inspections Department continues to provide assistance and support
to other City departments with regard to code complaints and nuisance related issues. The
majority of these matters are handled primarily by the Community Service Officer who has
done an outstanding job to alleviate a number of long-standlng problems in the City of Mound.
Members of the City Council are advised that a new nuisance ordinance was prepared in late
2001 and is currently under review by City staff.
PLANNING CO~SSION ADMINISTRATION
Planning Commission Projects Update. City staff has implemented the preparation of a
monthly project update which serves as a communication device so as to keep the Planning
Commission informed of current activities as well as upcoming land use applications.
Planning Commission Work Rules. The annual review and update of the Mound Planning
Commission Work Rules was completed in March 2001.
Sam-ple-Pianning-Reports:---Sampies of planning reports were distributed to the Planmng
Commission tn September 2001 to help determine whether not the current fbrmat should be
revised to allow for easier review and analysis.
Land Use Training. City Attorney John Dean attended the January 7, 2002 PC meeting to
conduct land use/legal training. City staff also distributed several informational land use and
zoning documents and/or training manuals to the Planning Commission.
2002 Projects List. The list includes a list of possible projects to be undertaken in 2002 by
the Planning and Building Inspection Department:
N°.n-conforming lots, structures and uses - additional streamlining measures
· Administrative review and approval of boundary adjustments
· Review of street vacation review process
·Review of CUP and zoning amendment processes
Review of City Code Chapter 365 - signs
· Review City Code Chapter 350:440 - required yards and open space
· Amendment of zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan - consistency issues
pursuant to M.S.S.
· Amendment to zoning districts - public utility uses and buildings
- 2317-
Land Use Application Processing. Pursuant to M.S.S. 15.99, letters to land use applicants are now
mailed within (10) business days to advise them whether or not the application (ie., variance, etc.) is
complete or incomplete.
Land Use Permit Applications. Administrative Assistant Jill Norlander updated the City's permit
application packets in 2001 to provide additional details regarding submittal requirements, application
deadlines and City staff's review procedures.
PLANNING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT MAJOR PROJECTS
----__~elo~:~t_~kqL-Of~:maiar nroi~ta: whiah uaere=.c,c~:mpletecl_:hv th~ Plannin~ ancl ~, filcllno Inan~mlcmc .
Department. It ~s ~mportant to note that several of these projects were completed' in cooperation axed
· MetroPlains Final Plat / EAW / Subdivision Agreement - September/October 2001
· CSAH 15 (on-going)
· Mound Surface Water Management Plan ( May 2001)
· MCWD / City of'Mound Cooperative Agreement (October 2001)
· Mound SWMP - Zoning Ordinance Amendments (March 2002)
· Langdon Bay Development Agreement (September 2001)
· Langdon Woods Development Agreement (September 2001)
· W/S Fee Schedule / Ordinance Amendments (January 2002)
· Nuisance Ordinance (in progress)
· Park Dedication Fee Increase (February 2002)
· Building Official Project Close-Out List (in progress)
PLANNING AND BuILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Building Permit Processing and Survey Information. Due to on-going concerns from City staff
with regard to building permit processing, it is strongly suggested that the City Council amend its
policy to require the submittal of updated survey information for all building permit applications.
Additionally, the implementation of a pre-construction site inspection should be considered to ensure
property staking of the proposed structure and compliance with the certified land survey.
Escrow Review. City staff is working cooperatively to review previous escrow accounts on file with
the City of Mound. The City Council may wish to consider the establishment of a policy which states
that escrow accounts should be released and/or refunded if there has been no activity on the project for
the last (12) months.
-2318-
Escrow Deposits. City staff offers the following recommendations with regard to escrow deposits:
1. A residential construction escrow for building permits should be established.
2. A project tracking form should be prepared in order to provide improved tracking for billing
purposes.
3. The City's required escrow deposit for land use applications amounts need to be evaluated.
Joint Planning Commission / City Council Communication. City staff would like the City Council
to consider the possibility of scheduling quarterly joint workshops to discuss cooperative pr_gj_ects and
~lie pi~lyarati'on ofan~annuat work pi-an.
Subdivision Information Policy. It is suggested that a department policy be established to indicate
that City staff will provide the City's roles and regulations to developers and/or other interested parties
with regard to proposed subdivisions but will not provide formal comment whether or not an
application meets the City Code unless all appropriate information including an updated survey has
been provided. Moreover, it is the applicant's responsibility to submit all requested information.
Members of the City Council are advised that it is quite common for developers and/or realtors to make
_Jnclumes __w_ith. _rega~r¢ _to~the_ ti~asibil_ity _ o_f __s_u. bdi_vj_ding a particular_property b_as_ed on minimal
information such as a plat drawing from Hennepin County which provides minimal information.
SUMMARY
On behalf of the Planning and Building inspections Department, I would like to express my sincere
thanks to the City Council and Planning Commission for their dedication and commitment to our
department and to the City of Mound. The countless hours that are spent on land use and permitting
issues do not go unnoticed. Additionally, I would like to thank the other City departments and
consulting staff that have provided assistance and staff support over the course of 2001 and who have
helped make my short tenure in Mound very enjoyable.
As always, we welcome any suggestions or comments that the City Council may have. You can be
assured that we will continue our endeavors to improve efficiency and customer service in our
department. It is certain that 2002 will bring many positive and exciting changes to the City of Mound.
-2319-
Case #
CASES FOR PLANNING COMMISSION FOR 2001
DATE
TYPE OF CASE APPLICANT SUBMITTED
STATUS
01-01 Zoning Amendment City of Mound 1/17/01
01-02 Conditional Use Steve Codden 1/4/01
.................... 5240 & 5212 Lynwood
Withdrawn
;:. 0!~03 Mi~3or_Subdivision_ ~rI & p~fricia 15alm~ui.~t _-%9=-01 ,.- Fii~
4520 Debigh Road
01-04
Conditional Use City of Mound 1/17/01
01-05
Minor Subdivision Brenshell Homes
4646 Island View Drive
2-5-01 Filed
01-06
01-07
01-08
01-09
01-10
01-11
01-12
01-13
01-14
01-15
01-16
Variance
Variance
Minor Subdivision
Variance
Variance
Variance
Final Plat
Final Plat
Variance
Variance
Variance
John & Pam Shaughnessy
Mark Hanus
4446 Denbigh Road
John & Pam Shaughnessy
6024 Cherrywood
Steven & Sharon Corl
4225 Wilshire Blvd
Carl & Patricia Palmquist
4520 Denbigh Road
Craig Rose
5100 Edgewater Drive
R.H. Development
Langdon Bay
Brenshell Homes
Langdon Woods
Dale & Rebecca Simons
4711 Cumberland Road
Kevin and Debra Larson
4525 Denbigh Road
Keith Brown
4957 Edgewater Drive
1/18/01
1/27/01
1/18/01
3/7/01
3/9/01
3/15/01
4/9/01
4/11/01
4/13/01
4/13/01
4/16/01
Withdrawn
Filed
Withdrawn
Filed
Filed
Approved
Filed
Filed
Filed
Approved
Filed
-2320-
Variance Elizabeth Maldonado 4/7/01 Withdrawn
5142 Waterbury Road
01-18 Minor Subdivision Steve Codden 4/17/01 Withdrawn
01-19 Variance
01-20 Easement Vacation
01-21 Street Vacation
Steve Codden
R.H: Development
Lang~a~
Kells Lane Pending
Jonathan Paul CC
4679 Wilshire Blvd
4/17/01 Withdrawn
5/3/01 Filed
5/10/01
01-22 Variance Karla Pederson 5/11/01 Denied
2754 Cardigan Lane
01-23 Street Vacation Butternut Road 5/17/01 Filed
R.H. Development
Langdon Bay
01-24 Variance Douglas Dunser 6/6/01 Approved
5984 Sunset Road
01-25 Variance Greg Goodfellow 7/6/01 Filed
1705 Baywood Shore Drive
01-26 Minor Subdivision Brenshell Homes for 7/10/01 Approved
Arlie Weitnaur
1642 Gull Lane
01-27
01-28
Variance Mary & James Merchant 7/10/01 Filed
5116 Tuxedo Boulevard
01-29 Variance Jan & Jim Taylor 7/11/01 Filed
4345 Wilshire Boulevard
01-30 Variance Village by Cook's Bay LLC 7/11/01 Filed
5600 Lynwood Boulevard
Cell Tower
01-31 Variance Brenshell Homes for 7/17/01 Approved
Arlie Weitnaur
1642 Gull Lane
-2321 -
01-32 Variance
01-33 Variance
01-34
Variance
01-35 Variance
01-36 Vanance
01-37 Variance
Elizabeth Maldonado 8/8/01
5142 Waterbury Road
John Smyth 8/8/01
4846 Wilshire Boulevard
Thomas Peterson
5993 Bartlett Boulevard
Mike & Klm Schulz 8/9/01
3022 Bluffs Drive
Stephen Hudak 8/8/01
2928 Tuxedo Boulevard
Steve Swenson 8/2/01
4865 Island View Drive
Approved
Filed
8/13/01 Filed
Approved
Filed
Approved
- 01=38~ ........~/ariance .............. Gwen& Clint Gables 8/30/0t Approved
2548 Avon Drive
01-39 Vacation David & Eleanor Willette 8/30/01
2542 Lost Lake Road
Approved
01-40 CUP Amendment
Mahagony Bay
Todd Warner
Approved
01-41 FINAL PLAT
Mound Visions 2nd Addition
Metro Plains Development
Approved
01-42 Variance And~w & Paula Anderson 10/5/01
3001 Brighton Boulevard
Approved
01-43 Variance Judith Milton 10/10/01
3033 Brighton Boulevard
Approved
01-44 Minor Subdivision Amerie Civic Corporation 10/31/01
2333 Wilshire Boulevard
Approved
01-45 Street Vacation Amerle Civic Corporation 10/31/01
B 3, Shirley Hills Addn - alley
2333 Wilshire Boulevard
Pending
01-46 Street Vacation Jeffery & Pamela Paul 12/11/01
Kells Lane
Pending
-2322-
CITY OF MOUND
BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT
DECEMBER YEAR: 2001
THIS MONTH YEAR TO DATE
RESIDENTIAL
NEWCONSTRUCTION II#PERMITS I#UNITS IVALUATION II#UNITS II VALUATION
SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED 5 5 1,053,800 17 3,494,105
SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED 4 430,000
TWO FAMILY / DUPLEX
MULTIPLE FAMILY (3 OR MORE UNITS)
TRANSIENT HSG. (HOTELS / MOTELS)
SUBTOTAL 5! 5 1,053,800 21i 3,924,105
I
COMMERCIAL (RETAIL/RESTAURANT) I 141,794
OFFICE / PROFESSIONAL
INDUSTRIAL
PUBLIC / SCHOOLS
SUBTOTAL 0 0 I 141,794
ADDITIONS TO PRINCIPAL BUILDING 2 99,014 37 1,363,487
DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS 15 246,455
DECKS 2 25,200 63 298,174
SWIMMING POOLS
~EMODEL - MISC. RESIDENTIAL 53 292,623 1171 7,227,684
~,EMODEL - MULTIPLE DWELLINGS 7 49,457
SUBTOTAL 57 0 416,837 1293 9,185,257
ON-RESlDENTIAL 3OMMERCIAL (RETAIL/RESTAURANT) 5 22,157
E)FFICE / PROFESSIONAL 3 197,911
NDUSTRIAL
3UBLIC / SCHOOLS 5 220,619
DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS 1 65,000 1 65,000
SUBTOTAL t 65,000 14 505,687
DEMOLITIONS II~ PERMITS I IVALUATION IF PERMITS I VALUATION
~,ESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS 2 9
NON-RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS 3
MOVE BUILDING - RESIDENTIAL 1
TOTAL DEMOLITIONS 2 0 13
# UNITS
~PERMITS # UNITS VALUATION ~ PERMITS VALUATION
tOTAL 6511 511 1,535,637 II 1,342 II 13,756,843
I THIS I YEAR - TO-
PERMIT COUNT MONTH DATE
BUILDING 65 1342
FENCES & RETAINING WALLS 0 28
SIGNS 3 15
PLUMBING 14 191
MECHANICAL 11 141
GRADING 2 8
S & W, STREET EXCAV., FIRE, ETC. 10 45
TOTAL I 1o5 I 177o
-2323-
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Greg Skinner, Public Works Superintendent
Matt sim°neau, BUilding OffiCial
Date!
John Cameron, City Engineer
5/9/2002
Re:
New Residential / Remodel Construction Policies and Procedures
Residential Construction Escrow
City staff would like an opportunity to discuss the establishment of an escrow deposit which
would be required for construction of a new single-family dwelling and/or renovation project
(ie. garage addition,, second floor addition, etc.) which would be posted by the builder and/or property
owner prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The purpose for the proposed
escrow deposit is to ensure that outstanding issues, including but not limited to, grading and
drainage, utilities locations and landscaping activities have been satisfactorily addressed in the
event a Certificate of Occupancy is requested and issued by the Building Official. This escrow
deposit could also be used in the event that damage is done to local streets as a result of the
residential construction project. It is also anticipated that the new escrow program will reduce
and/or eliminate the need for temporary Certificates of Occupancy.
Recently, City staff'has experienced a number of"after-the-fact" problems that have surfaced
after a Certificat9 of OcCupancy has been issued and the properties have been subsequently sold
by the builder anWor developer It is City staff's position that the establishment of an escrow
could protect the buyers and/or new Mound homeowner' s in the event there are site problems
and/or utilities cOrrections which need to be remedied. In the event that the escrow deposit is
favorably received, City staff`recommends that the following schedule be considered:
Final grading $
DrivewaY installation
As-built surveys
Tree planting
Landscaping
Utilities
Misc. building code requirement(s)
500.00
1000.00
500.00
250.00 (each)
1000.00
Staff estimate based on value of work
Staff estimate based on value of work
-2324-
Residential Driveway Surface Requirements
City staff'respectfully requests an opportunity to discuss the current regulations regarding
driveway surfacing. At the present time, the City's regulations do not require residential
driveways to be surfaced with asphalt or concrete. However, due to on-going problems
primarily associated with mn-off, City staffwould like the Council to consider amending the
City Code to require that driveways must be paved on all new residential construction and
major renovation projects including, but not limited to, the addition ora new attached or
detached garage.
City staff welcomes the opportunity to review and discuss these issues with the City Council.
Attachments
· CityofBlaineFinal Check~OffEscrow Requirements
· City of Blaine Final Inspection Notice
Page 2
-2325-
CITY OF BLAINE
FINAL INSPECTION NOTICE
PERMIT NO.
ADDRESS
SCHEDULED
COMPLETED
DATE TIME
OWNER/CONTR.
TEL. NO.
ZONING
OCCUPANCY
METER SERIAL NUMBER:
PLBG FINAL:
MECHANICAL FINAL:
ELECTRICAL FINAL:
SEPTIC FINAL:
FIRE SUPPRESSION FINAL:
BUILDING FINAL:
[] DECK COMPLETED [] NO DECK - DOOR BLOCKED
ESCROW:
[] AS-BUILTS $
[] FINAL GRADE $
[] BLACK DIRT/SOD $
[] FRONT YARD TREES $
[] TOTAL $
[] DRIVEWAY $
[] TREE PRESERVATION $.
[] ESCROW INSPECTION FEE $.
[] BLDG. CODE ITEMS FEE $
C.O.s WILL BE READY FOR PICK UP BY NOON THE FOLLOWING WORK DAY
[] OK TO ISSUE C/O [] NOT OK TO ISSUE C/O
[] CORRECT WORK - CALL FOR REINSPECTION
[] INSPECTION REQUIRED - CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS
BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT.
9150 CENTRAL AVENUE N.E.
BLAINE, MN 55434
Inspector's Signature Phone: (763) 785-6170
Green Copy/Inspector's Copy -2326-/Builder's Site Copy
FINAL CHECK-OFF
ESCROW REQUIREMENTS
ADDRESS:
OWNER/CONTRACTOR:
FIELD INSPECTOR:
DATE:
I. Curb stop box in driveway. Yes. No
Curb stop box located in driveway with a Ford Type A lid cover Yes No
Shut off brought to grade flush with sod or driveway. Yes No
2. Driveway completed. Yes No
Side yard set back approved. Yes No
Width approved. Yes__ No
No brush piles or construction debris pushed onto neighboring lots __
· Tree preservation plan complied with __
Other unique requirements as per development agreement and covenants. Also, if the new house is in the
designated flood-plain management area, as noted by the City Engineer, is there an as-built elevation from an R.L.S.
in the permit file qualifying lowest floor elevation!
Landscaping improvements or other site requirements that are required for single family homes either by ordinance or
development agreement can be completed after Certificate of Occupancy provided an escrow has be deposited with the
City. The escrow will contain a fee to be collected at the time of escrow to cover the City's cost of re-inspection. An
additional fee of $100 may be charged by the City for work that is not completed within the 30 days.
5. Final grading completed per grading plan. ($1,000)
6. A minimum of four (4") inches of black dirt on all yards before laying sod.
R-1, R-1AA $750 R-lA $1,000
7. Sodding of boulevard and yards. R-l, R-1AA $1,250 R-lA $1,750
8. 2 1/2" caliper balled & burlapped front yard tree. ($250 each)
Two required in the R-lA districts.
9. 2 I/2" caliper balled and burlapped boulevard tree (two if comer lot).
Location and specie per handout. ($250 each)
10. Driveway, hard surfaced. ($1,500)
11. Miscellaneous building code requirements:
12. Escrow for Tree Preservation: (see worksheet)
13. As-Built Surveys/Final Grading ($1,350.00)
14. $100.00 - Escrow Inspection Fee
Total
Escrow Provisions:
The building contractor or his agent is to make a cash deposit with the City for uncompleted items prior to issuance of
the certificate of occupancy. A builder may submit a letter from the lender in a form set forth on the reverse side,
stating they will escrow the above cited amounts for the uncompleted items and not release such funds until
Community Development verifies that the work is completed· A fee of $100.00 will be charged for each escrow
inspection. The fee shall be deducted from the escrow held by the City or the lender holding the escrow shall forward
the appropriate fee with receipt of release form from the City. Signature of this agreement authorizes the City to
deduct the appropriate fee from the escrow prior to remittance.
_d;_ I:¥1
~0'~ qWlO±
I
April 19, 2002
II
A o[ia ion ol
Hc ropoli£an
Hunkipali i
Legislature
The legislative session continues
with no resolution of the budget,
transportation funding or capital
bonding bills. Each body held only
two floor sessions this week and
a handful of conference committee
meetings accomplished little.
May Board Meeting
The next Board meeting is sched-
uled for Thursday, May 2. Among
the items likely to be on the agenda
are budget modifications, strate-
gic planning, the report of the nomi-
nating committee and a discus-
sion with Lee Sheehy, Regional
Administrator for the Metropolitan
Council. The agenda and materi-
als will be mailed next week.
Public Finance Bill
Informal public meetings regarding
the public finance provisions con-
tained in H.F.3270 and S.F.2572
were held on Wednesday, April 17
and Thursday, April 18. The meet-
ing was called by the authom of the
public finance provisions, Sen.
Rest and Rep. Abrams, to review
the provisions section by section.
As a result ofthe review, two Sen-
ate provisions of interest to AMM
were left open for further research
and discussion-the Metropolitan
Council's Redevelopment Revolv-
ing Loan Fund and the referendum
exception for general obligation
bonds sold for street reconstruc-
tion projects.
The first would authorize the Met-
ropolitan Council to use its own
available funds to make loans to
cities for infrastructure invest-
ments, land acquisition and other
costs related to affordable hous-
ing development. Loans would
have to be repaid at an interest
rate and term set by the Met Coun-
cil. Because many of then Metro-
politan Council's funds cannot be
committed for a long period of time
it is probable that the loans will
have a short term - potentially 5
years or less.
The exemption from the referen-
dum requirement as a condition to
AMM Board .Update is foxed to the AMM
Board of Dlre~ors to provide informatlo~f
on AMM, ~gion~ ~d I~e
pr~l~ ~e n~ Board agez~ ~d
a~ ~h~ ~e~
~Copyright 2001 AMM
145 Unl~rsity Ave~ue West
St. Paul, MN 55103-2044
Phone~' (651) 215-4000
Fax: (651) 251=1299
E-mail: amm~amm14 5. org
issue general obligation bonds
would be extended to street recon-
struction projects as long as the
original street was funded in whole
or in part with special assess-
ments. If enacted, a city could is-
sue general obligation bonds to fi-
nance a street reconstruction pro-
gram. In cities that finance projects
with special assessments, the new
authority will need to be coordi-
nated with the special assessment
policy.
Blueprint Discussion
Meetings: Round !1
Staffis planning to meet with mem-
her cities in mid-May to discuss the
new MUSA policy being consid-
ered by the Metropolitan Council.
The policy would have the great-
est impact on member cities in the
developing areas of the region, but
all members will be invited to at-
tend. We are currently planning on
two meetings - one in St. Paul for
East Metro cities and one in Maple
Grove for West Metro tittles. More
details will be provided at the
Board meeting.
xgj ~!A &B:&B:gI ZBOZ GT ~dO
May OZ ZOOZ 14:59:05 ~ia Fax -> 55Z4?ZBGZB
AMM FAX
NE¸
P rtner hipS in Pro dding
ervi lution
April 29 - May 3, 2002
I I
Metropolitan Council Seeks Authorization for
Housing Production Revolving Loan Fund
The public finance article of the
Senate's budget bill (H.F. 3270) con-
tains a provision that would autho-
rize the Metropolitan Council to es-
tablish a Housing Production Revolv-
ing Loan Fund, utilizing existing Coun-
cil resources and any gifts or grants
awarded to the Council for the pur-
pose of the fund.
The fund would be used to make
loans to metropolitan cities, counties,
townships or development authori-
ties for projects with "a reasonable
f of resulting in lower hous-
ing costs in the metropolitan area."
Eligible projects include those which
"support housing production and en-
sure integration of land use and
transportation needs."
The loans would be relatively short
term (in the neighborhood of five
years) and would have to be repaid,
with interest. They would have to be
secured by either a general obliga-
tion pledge from the municipality or
a pledge of other assets.
No similar authorization is contained
in the House's public finance bill.
However, the Met Council has made
several changes to the language in
an attempt to respond to concerns
expressed by House members, the
AMM and other interested parties.
Those changes include eliminating
the requirement that an applicant
must be a participant in the Livable
Communities Program, eliminating
the requirement for a local match and
clarification that communities under-
taking both redevelopment and de-
velopment projects are eligible to re-
ceive loans.
The Council has also agreed to es-
tablish a loan review committee,
composed of individuals with exper-
tise in finance, development and lo-
cal government; and adopt uniform
criteria and procedures for the pro-
gram, which will be subject to public
hearing. Finally, the Metropolitan
Council would have to submit an
annual report on the program to the
Legislative Commission on the Met-
ropolitan Council.
A copy of the draft language is avail-
able by calling AMM at 651/215-4 000.
Metropolitan Council Considers Expanding Wastewater
Treatment to Rural Growth Centers in Metro Area
In recent weeks, Metropolitan Coun-
cil staff and members have been dis-
cussing the possibility of extending
wastewater services to rural growth
centers in and around the seven-
county metropolitan area. Commu-
nities identified as rural growth cen-
ters include St. Francis, Watertown,
Bethel, Hamburg, Mayer, New Ger-
many, Hampton, Vermillion, Belle
Plaine, Cologne, Jordan, Rockford,
and Norwood-Young America.
eehe idea raises numerous iSSUes
garding how such an expansion
would be paid for, the level of sub-
sidy that existing rate payers would
be asked to provide, and under what
conditions the Council would extend
services.
The concept of extending wastewa-
ter services to rural growth centers
stems from the Council's work on
the new Regional Blueprint and a
recent report from the Council's Ru-
ral Issues Workgroup. The rural is-
sues report recommends that the
Council work to direct growth and
development toward rural centers,
and away from other rural areas,
such as those designated "perma-
nent agricultural." This would pre-
sumably help the region accommo-
-2329-
date the 460,000 new households
expected by 2030, while slowing the
growth in large-lot residential devel-
opment on individual septic systems.
Association of
Hunicipalltiet
continued on next page
F~: (6513 281-t299
E-mall: am~mI45, org
~IMM Fax N~ws is fay, ed to all AMM city
managers and adm#dstrator$, lzgl$latipe con-
facts and Board membet~, Please share thi~
fax with your mayors, councilmembers and
staff to ke~p them abreast of imporlant metro
city issues.
Hay BZ 2BB2 14:59:59 gJ.a Fax ->
Association o,f Metropolitan Municipalities News/=ax
wastewater t~eatment, con~
The extension of Wastewater ser-
vices is seen as one tool for accom-
plishing this goal of directing devel-
opment toward these rural growth
centers.
A majority of rural growth centers cur-
rently operate their own wastewater
treatment plants, but the costs of up-
grading and/or expanding these op-
erations to serve a growing popula-
tion is often extremely high; creating
a disincentive for these communities
to accept more growth. Additionally,
some facilities located in rural growth
centers are struggling to meet envi-
ronmental standards for wastewater
treatment and discharge. As it is,
property owners in these rural growth
centers are paying significantly
higher SAC charges and user rates
than those inside the Metropolitan
Council's service area.
The Council has indicated that they
would only be interested in providing
wastewater services to communities
that want their assistance. Further-
more, the Council would not neces-
sarily expand the existing system to
connect the rural growth centers to
the current service area. Instead they
might simply acquire and/or operate
the facilities currently owned by these
individual communities or establish
"satelite MUSAs" that serve two or
three rural growth centers.
Council staff has compiled several
9524?ZOGZB Kan&is Hanson ]~aa-c 083 rl£ 883
April 29 -, May 3, 2002, page 2 of 2
MCES Outlines 2003 Budget and Rates
As part of a recent series of breakfast meetings, the Metropolitan
Council's Environmental Services Division (MCES) has outlined its pre,
liminary budget and user rates for 2003; The pro~sed bUdget Of $168,9
million would be 2.5% greater than the 2002 budget. Approximately $130
million of this would come from municipal wastewater rates, which are
proposed to be $12.9 per 100,000 gallons in 2003. This would be a $6
increase over the current rate of $123 per 100,000 gallons.
The remaining revenue would come from sewer availability charges
(SAC)i industrial Chames and other s0Ur~s. The major expenditure in'
creases for 2003 are expected to be debt service and security costs.
The proposed budget will be presented to the Metropolitan Council's
Environment Commiffee in May and the annual preliminary "rate letter"
is scheduled to be mailed to cities in July.
possible rate scenarios for the ex-
tension of services. The first option,
labeled ~Complete Regionalization,"
would result in the participating rural
growth centers paying the same
municipal wastewater charge and
SAC fee as the Council's current rate
payers. Council staff estimates that
this would increase the municipal
wastewater rate by 4 percent and the
SAC fee by 8 percent.
A second possible scenario would
be for the Metropolitan Council to
operate an independent rural service
area to serve rural growth centers
separately from the urban core. Un-
der this scenario the rates for cur-
rent users would remain unchanged,
and the rural growth centers would
pay a separate, and presumably
higher, SAC and municipal wastewa-
ter rate. However, based on rough
estimates from Council staff, it
seems unlikely that this option would
offer the rural growth centers enough
of a cost savings to make it worth
while.
Athird option would have rural growth
centers pay a higher SAC fee (esti-
mated at $3,200 initially), but the
same municipal wastewater rate as
current rate payers. This would re-
sult in a roughly 3 percent increase
in the municipal wastewater rate
charged by the Council.
If you have questions or concerns
about the Council's plans, please
contact Kris Wilson at AMM (651/
215-4003 o r kristin e@a m m 145. o rg).
- 2330- TOTRL P. 03
flpr ZG ZOOZ 15:41:47 Via Fax -> 95Z4?ZBGZO A&~inis~ra~or Page 881 0£ 88Z
Broken Record: Maybe next
week
Perhaps it has something to do with the current
alignment of five planets in the western sky or
just the dynamics of the three-partY system
trying to function six months before a
redistricted election. Whatever the cause, the
legislature just isn't moving forward.
Again this week, the House and Senate made
little progress on the major outstanding issues
of the session. Monday marks the three-week
countdown to the constitutional end of the 2002
regular legislative session. Although that may
seem like enough time to complete their work,
negotiations have not resumed on the budget
reconciliation, bonding, transportation finances
anti-terrorism and stadium bills. In addition, the
legislature should probably leave at least a few
days or a week to override any potential
gubernatorial veto.
The media reported some progress this week on
the budget reconciliation package but the
rumors among capitol lobbyists suggested that
the progress was ever-so-slight. The rumored
"progress" suggested that the Senate would
back off their cigarette and tobacco tax increase
that was originally targeted to rebuild the
state's budget reserve and to plug the 2004-05
biennial budget deficit. In exchange, the House
would accept the gas tax increase at a level
below the Senate's original six cent a gallon
proposal.
The politics of the gas tax increase are
interesting indeed. With gas prices rising and
potentially expected to increase even more
throughout the summer driving season, many
legislators are concerned that the tax increase
will hit voters at precisely the wrong time.
- Frid ay F ax -
A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities
April 26~ 2002
Page 1
However, the more contentious issue is whether
any gas tax increase is dedicated solely roads or
ifa portion of the revenues would be used for a
multi-modal fund and then whether the multi-
modal fund could be used for the politically
sensitive light:rail line Or the pr6pos~
Northstar commuter rail line. A solution that
would simply split the difference between the
House (no tax increase) and the Senate (six-
cent increase) would not address these more
divisive issues.
If the session ends without a House/Senate
agreement that has enough House and Senate
support to sustain a potential gubernatorial
veto, the job of balancing the state's budget
could fall back on the Governor and the
Commissioner of Finance. Under state law, the
governor and the commissioner of finance can
make "unallotments" in state spending to
balance the remaining deficit.
The unallotment power clearly extends to
appropriations of aid payments and homestead
credit reimbursements to cities, counties and
school districts. Given that the governor has
been critical of the Phase I budget
reconciliation plan because local governments
did not "share the pain", unallotment could
translate into cuts in July, October and
December aid and homestead credit
reimbursement payments to be distributed yet
this year if unallotment is exercised.
Let's hope the stars align sometime soon.
For more informalion on chy legi,qative issues, contact any member of the League of Minnes01a Ciliea InlergoveTnmental R~lati0na team.
651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122
-2331 -
~p~ ZG 2002 15:4Z:ZG ~ia Fax -> 9524?ZBGZO Ad~inis%~a~o~ ~a§e 002 O~ BOZ
:
- I a ax..
! o.'~,~,,.~ ..... ~..[~ A weeldy legislative update from theLeasue of Minnesota Cities
April 26, 2002
Page 2
Three Centuries of Experience Lost
Since the release of the new redistricting plans there.have been numerous
announcements of retirements from legislators on both sides 0flthe aisiei AS:°f pr:ess
time today, the Legislature is losing the following legislators with a combined 310 years
of legislative experience. We expect even more announcements and changes
occurring with the end of session, 201 legislative races, and the usual gubernatorial
appointments after a governor's election. While some of those listed below are running
for higher office such as the governor's office, or Congress--they have all announced
they will not be running for a legislative seat. The 83rasession is sure to bring new
faces to the table.
Lec~ialatom Announo~,!
Senator Doug Johnson (DFL-Tower)
Senator Roy Terwilliger (R-Edina)
Senator Myron Orfield (DFL-Mpls)
Senator Charlie Berg (R-Chokio)
Senator Roger Moe (DFL-Erskine)
Senator Arlene Lesewski (R-Marshall)
Senator Dan Stevens (R-Mora)
Senator Tony Kinkel (DFL-Park Rapids)
Senator Ed Oliver (R-Deephaven)
Rep. Rob Leighton (DFL-Austin)
Rep.
Rep.
Rep.
Rep.
Rep.
Rep.
Rep.
Rep.
Rep.
Rep.
Harry Mares (R-White Bear Lake)
Mary Jo McGuire (DFL-Falcon Heights)
Mike Osskopp (R-Lake City)
Andy Dawkins (DFL-St. Paul)
Greg Gray (DFL-Mpls)
Bob Milbert (DFL-Inver Grove Heights)
Tom Osthoff (DFL-St. Paul)
Doug Peterson (DFL-Madison)
Roxanne Daggett (R-Frazee)
Henry Kalis (DFL-WelIs)
Firet Current New
8 terms 1970 SD 6 SD 6
4 terms 1992 SD 42 SD 41
term 1990 SD 60 SD 60
terms 1972 SD 13 SD 11
0 terms 1970 SD 2 SD 1
terms 1992 SD 21 SD 21
term s 1992 SD 17 SD 8
terms 1986 SD 4 SD 2
terms 1992 SD 43 SD 33
terms 1994 LD 27B LD 27B
terms 1994 LD 55A LD 53B
terms 1988 LB 54A LD 66B
terms 1994 LD 29B LD 28A
terms 1987 LB 65A LB 65A
terms 1998 LD 58B LD 58B
terms 1986 LD 39B LD 39B
4 terms 1974 LD 66A LD 66A
terms 1990 LB 13B LD 20A
4terms 1994 LD 11A LD 10B
4 terms 1974 LD 26B LD 24B
For more information on city legislal[ve issues, contact any member of the League of Minnesota Cities Intergovernmental Relations team.
651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122
-2332-
~ap 03 Z082 13:58:34 ~io Fax -> 95Z~?ZOGZ8 ~&ni~is~ra~or ~ag~ 881 Of
j'
The session in reverse
Most legislative sessions begin very slowly and
end with a frenetic sprint to the finish. This
year, the process seems to have been reversed.
This session started with a roar of activity to
balance a projected budget deficit but for the
past month, the pace has slowed to a standstill.
In early January before the session began, the
governor offered his plan to balance the
shortfall, including major reductions in state aid
to cities. Coupled with the release of his plan,
he also challenged the legislature to take
immediate action to address the state's budget
problem--even suggesting that the legislature
should pass a proposal in the first weeks of the
session.
The session began on January 29 with a
projected $2 billion shortfall and a demand by
the governor for an immediate budget
reconciliation by the legislature. House and
Senate committees began meeting immediately
and on February 22, the legislature had
presented the governor with a Phase I $2 billion
budget reconciliation package. Although he
vetoed the bill on February 25, the House
overrode the veto on February 27 and the
Senate followed one day later. In all, it took the
legislature less than one month to address the
initial $2 billion deficit.
The state's financial situation took a turn for
the worse when the Department of Finance
announced on February 25 that the deficit had
grown by an additional $439 million. Given
that the Phase I plan drew upon the easy
solutions such as shifting state resources and
drawing down reserves, it should not be
entirely surprising that the smaller remaining
deficit has been more difficult to address. That
said, the House and Senate each devised their
- Frid ay F ax -
A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities
May 3, 2002
Page 1
own plans that resolved the issue with minimal
additional pain.
The remaining $439 million deficit, along with
other controversial issues such as the gas tax~
the stadium, the anti.terrorism bill and_the ..........
bonding bill remain the major Sticking points.
Technically, the legislature could go home
without addressing any of these issues.
However, the budget deficit will ultimately
require some action--if not by the legislature
then by the governor. He could be responsible
for balancing the remaining deficit with his
power to unallot state appropriations, which
could include cuts in state aid to cities.
The legislature is running out of time. The
regular session must end by May 20--wlth or
without resolution of these major issues. If we
don't see some signs of activity soon, the
legislature may not have enough time to repeat
an override of an expected governor's veto of
whatever compromise is reached for Phase II.
Bonding committee meets--sort
of...
With virtually no official conference committee
action this week at the Capitol, the House
conferees of the bonding committee held an
unofficial "working group" meeting to take
public testimony on a variety of projects.
Although the Senate holds the gavel--meaning
its their turn to call the meeting--House
conferees used the time to hear more about a
variety of issues. Of most interest to the
municipal community was testimony on
potential changes to redevelopment and
economic development programs.
For more information on city legislative issues, contact any member of the League of Minnesota Cities Intergovemmenlal Relalions team.
651,281.1200 or 800.925.1122
-2333-
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA
7:00 PM, Wednesday, April 24, 2002
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
-C-HN~~:N~TSTChairF~ste r
READING OF MINUTES- 4/10/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting
PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.)
· Abdo, Abdo, Eick, & Meyers, discussion of draft 2001 LMCD Audit.:,
PUBLIC HEARINGS
· City of Minnetonka, new multiple dock license, launching ramp, and variance
applications to: 1) construct 30 Boat Storage Units (BSU's), 2) install a new public
launching ramp, and 3) variance from LMCD Code for dock length requirements.
1. Public Hearing
2. Discussion and/or Consideration
Foxhill Association, new multiple dock license application to: 1) reconflgure a non-
conforming multiple dock facility, and 2) variance from LMCD Code for dock length and
side setback requirements. 1. Public Hearing
2. Discussion and/or Consideration
WATER STRUCTURES
A) Robert Stierna, consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for approval of variance
application from LMCD Code for dock length requirements;
B) Additional Business;
2. SAVE THE LAKE
A) Consideration of draft 2002 "Save the Lake" Budget;
B) Additional Business;
3. FINANCIAL
A) Audit of vouchers (4/15/02 - 4/30/02) (handout);
B) Additional Business;
-2334-
4. EWMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE
A) 2002 EWM Harvesting Season, staff overview of project;
B) Update on "Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Outof Lake Minnetonka" project;
C) Additional Business;
5. LAKE USE & RECREATION
6. ADMINISTRATION
7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR-REPORT
8. OLD BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
10.ADJOURNMENT
-2335-
CALL TO ORDER
DR.:AFT
LAKE MINNETONKA'CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
7:00 PM,Wednesday, April 10, 2002
............................. TonkaBayClty-Hall ............... : ................. ~ .........
Foster called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
ROLL CALL'
Members present: Bert Foster, DeePhaven; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Lili McMillan, Orono; Tom Skramstad,
Shorewood; DougBabcock, Tonka Bay; Crv Burma, Mound; Tom Gilman, Excelsiorl Paul Knudsen~ Minnetrista; Tom
Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Katy Van Hercke, Uinnetonka; Sheldon Wert, Greewnood. Aisc present: Charles
LeFevere, LMCD Counsel;~ Grog Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician.
Members absent: Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Herb Suerth, Woodland. Victoria has no appointed Board member.
CHAIR ANNOUNCMENTS, Chair FOster
There:were no Chair announcements, ~.
READING OF MINUTES. 3/13102 LMCD Regular Board Meeting
MOTION: BabCOck moved~.: Seuntjens seconded to approve the minutes from the 3/13/02 Regular Board Meeting
~: as submitted..
VOTE: Ayes (8), Abstained (1, Nelson); motion carried.
PUBLIC COMMENTS. Persons in attendance, subjects noton'the agenda.
There were no comments from the public on subjects not on the agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified..with a (~) will ,be approved in'one rnotio'n, unless a:Board
memberrequests discussion of any item, in which case'the,'item will'be removed from the consent agenda,:
MOTION:~Seuntjens..moved, McMillan seconded to approve the cohsent agenda as=subm~itted,
VOTE: Motion· carded '·unanimously.
Items so'apProved include:2A; 2002 MUltiPle, Do~kLicenses, §taft recommendS' approval:of 2002 renewal Without
change applications forCardinalCeve BeaChAssociation and Lindbo-Landing,. 4A~: 2002Liquoi~:Licenses,'$'taff
recommends approval of renewal Wine and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License applications for the charter boat,
Lady of the Lake; ':and 4B,, Hennepin :County Sheriffs!OffiCe'Water Patrol Significant ·ACtivity Report. ~ ' ·
Knudsen arrived at 7:05 p.m.
Gabriel Jabbour, discussion of lake,related issueS.
Foster welcomed Jabbour on behalf the Board of Directors.
-2336-
Lake Min'netonka Conservation District
RegUlar Board Meetin9
April 10, 2002 Page 2
Mr. Gabbriel Jabbour thanked the Board forimplemeritation of the Water Patrol project that increased the
presence of full-time Deputies by mo for five months during~the 2001 boating season. He questioned whether
........ the ~e~bbr~itie~ and-the-geh~tal-publi(~-actuallY r~alize-d :th~'b~nefit of ihcrease-d presen~ in 2001; especially
with the additional contacts made with the public by licensed peace officers. He reminded that Board that the
voluntary participation for those cities that agreed to the project was for two years and that this ~0uld be an issue
for 2003. He added that the 100% funding of the project for 2003 by Hennepin County was going to be a very
difficult process because of potential budget cuts. He believed that this project creates an improved law
enforcement program and..quality of life at a higher standard that is .currently offered by the Sheriffs Department.
~h emelationshil:uNJth th e SherJff_sDe par~men.t_is_currently~/eLygQod~and_he_encQuraged_the_~ ~inuationz)JJJ'Jis
project beyond 2002, even If it means cost sharing of the program with HennePin County. He concluded:that ;'t~
there is a need to continue working on the project for 2003 and beyond now rather than later; ·
Foster stated that he concurred with Jabbour and that he had advised staff to investigate whether continuation of
the program for 2003 could be included in the District budget. He concurred that there is a need to establish a
working group to lobbY Hennepin County for continuation,of this program,, noting that Board member Skramstad
had expressed interest in this and that Jabbour could also participate in this. He hoped that Hennepin County
might consider permanently authorizing one of the two Deputies with the Sheriffs Department staff and that:the
District would need to find a permanent funding source locally for the second Deputy. Possible funding options
locally could include private fundraising, "Save the Lake" contributions, or including it as part of the annual
District budget.
Jabbour stated that the continuation of the project could use the moral support of the member cities. A key
element of the program is that:the additional hours of the two additional Deputies are spent 100% ,on Lake:
Uinnetonka unless an emergency occurs elsewhere in Hennepin County. In 2001, there were no fatalities on
Lake Minnetonka, there was a 50% reduction in bodily injuries, and a 100% increase in public contacts with a
50% reduction in written citations.
The consensus of the Board was to have Skramstad ~workwith Jabbour and other interested Board members on
a lobbying effort for continued funding of the Water Patrol beyond 2002.
Jabbour stated that he had been serving on a committee for the City of Orono on the construction of a new fire
statien, .One item that.came outofthe ~mmittee discussions wasresponse time for emerg"en0ies on?Lake
Minnetonka,. The Long Lake Fire Department currently :has a number .,el:boats and.they,amplanning;on?{0 baY
larger boats to respond to emergencies on Lake Uinnetonka. The Mound Fire Department has already
purchased a boat and ~ere might.be othe~ ~firedepartments following~this.trend in the future.
discussed how these boats would access Lake Uinnetonka, particularly the larger ones, because timely
response time is a necessity. He recommended that District might want to consider~amending the Code
pertaining to public amenities for special density licenses and allow for storage of these type of rescue watemraft
9n the, water;noting that iLwould supplement-theefforts of the Water Patroli~ The storage of these types of
watemraft,:would also allow, for a better response time,if environmental spills:occurred on LakeMinnetonka;
Foster stated that ~he understood the~re department boats Were robe on trailers rather than stored on Lake:.
Uinnetonka to allow for responses of emergencies on all bodies of water within that city.
Jabbour stated that some of the local fire departments have several boats for emergency purposes. Any boats
stored on the water would need to be coordinated with the Wate~ Patrol,-He.believed that these type of.public
amenities might be more appropriate for facilities with special density licenses.
-2337-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
April 't0, ~2002 Page '3
BabCoCk asked if the member cities that have pUrchased Watercraft for water emergencies have quantified and
defined the problems. He questioned whether a study conducting this had been done by any' member cities,
noting that it would be beneficial if the District were to consider amending the Code to a ow for the storage of
§Ll(:;h- ~a-te r6~ff ~ ~'~lsU-bii~- ~ii~~ .
Jabbour stated that he was not aware of a study; 'however, the general trend is thatmost fire department will
purchase rescUe equipment that is similar to what another fire department has. City COuncils generally dictate
the budget and needs for that member city; hbwever, there are significant charitable funds raised by the fire
departments that are not under the control of the-city c~Uncil,~ '~
The consensus of the Board was that Board member Babcock wOuld work with Jabbour and other interested
Board members to reevaluate the public amenity aspect of the COde pertaining to special density licenses.
PUBLIC HEARINGS ';
· U.S. Boat & Recreation, Inc., new on-sale non-intoxicating malt liquor license application for the charter boat,
Looneytoon.
FoSter opened the public hearing at 7:24 P.m. He asked the BOard or the applicant if they had comments or
questions on the proposed application.
Wert asked if the proposed charter boat was new.
Harper stated that it was an existing charter boat that was new in' 2001.
Nelson asked who owned U.S. Boat and Recreation, Inc.
Harper stated that the applicant is the new owner of Minnetonka Boat Club and Rentals.
Skramstad asked for clarification on the $500 deposit requirement.
Nybeck stated that investigations are conducted by the. Hennepin County Sheriff's Department, whether they are
new or renewal, for all charter boats with liquor licenses on Lake Minnetonka. The Shedffs Department has the
option of billing the Distdct for the investigation conducted; however, :they have decided not to: There have' been
aifew instances.~in ~recentyears where the investigatien conducted by,the @heriffs Department,has,raised some
issues' that,required ~utther:researCh by staff'and/or LeFevere, In.~theSe ir~tances~ ~e Distdct withheld either part
or the entiredeposit fee for~theSe~additior~-al.fees incurred'by.the District,
..~.~ ~ , ,.... , , ,~., ,~ .:; ~,~.:~,: ,:'
There being no further comments, Foster~,.closedthe public-~headngat'7:28 p,m.
· .~ .,, ...,~ ,~.' ,,'~; !:~ · ·
MO'rlONi,:~ert moVed, Skra~stad sec°ndedto approv;'thenew,...;o.n,sale non-intoxicating malt:.liquor license
., application for the charter bo~at~-~ne~oon fern.the 2002,season, andto refund, the $500 deposit for the
.preliminary. n,vestigation conducted,.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously....,
Wayzata Bay Charters, Inc., new on-sale non-intoxicating malt liquor an(:] wine license applications for the
charter boat, Voyager of the Lake.
-2338-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
Foster opened the public hearing at 7:29 p,m~ He asked the Board or the applicant if they had comments or
questions on the proposed applications. .
N~be~k~iarifi~d t~at' t~e: c~ad~r bbat Of th~ :~p~li~t ~re~ib~i~ h~d ~ into~ibatifig liq~5~ Ill, rise flaf~w~
pumhased by Bayview Event Cha~er Cruises in 2~1 with the liquor licens~ ~ansferred to an existing Bawiew
Event cha~er boat. The policy that regulates ~e issuance of intoxicating liquor licenses to charier boats on Lake
Minnetonka allows for ~e transaction of Bayview Event Cha~er Cruises, subject to the purchase of the boat and
business, not only the liquor license itself. Staff has checked into this with the applicant and he has stated that
he purchased the pm~sed boat from Bayview Event Charier-Cruise,.
Foster stated that as long as the Distdct has a limitation on intoxicating liquor censes for charier boats on Lake
Minneton~ka, he believed that there would be a demand for them similar to the medallion situation for taxicabs in
New Yo~. He believed that one solution would be to substantially increase the fee for liquor licenses or to
approach the state legislature to increase ~e number from 14, noting that some member cities have expressed
concern about this.
Babcock stated that if the number of intoxicating liquor licenses for charter boats was proposed to be increased
by the state legislature, he believed that it should be tied to a corresponding increase in law enforcement.
Them being no further comments, Foster closed the public hearing at 7:31 p,m.
MOTION: Skramstad moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the new on-sale non-intoxicating malt liquor and
wine license applications for the charter boat Voyager of the Lake for the 2002 season, and to refund
the $500 deposit for the preliminary investigation conducted.
VOTE:
Motion carried unanimously.
· City of Minnetonka Beach, new multiple dock license application to reconfigure a non-conforming facility under
LMCD Code Section 2.015 at Dock Sites 3, 6, 14, 20, and 23.
Foster opened the public hearing at 7:32 p.m. He asked staff for background on the proposed application.
Nybeck made the following comments:
· A new multiple.dock license application has been received to reconfigur,e.the non-:conforming facility
-- · un~ler Code Section 2.015. The applicant is,currently approved for 86 BoatStorage Units(BSU's)i at 25
dock sites, on 2,370' of non-~ontinuous shoreline. Code:Section2.,02; Sub& 1 prohibits the moodng or
docking of a greater number of watercraft than one for each 50' of continuous shoreline in existence on
5/3/78, unless authorized ~[o do so 'by a special density license: -..
· A public headng was conducted for the proposed new multiple dock license, application, plus an
apPlication fo~.vadancefrom Code.'for side setbacks -atDOck Site #3, at.the 2/13/02 Regular ~Meetii~g.
. Staff expressed concem about the proposed'variance, application 'bedau~ they q uesti0ned whether a
physical hardship existed. Additionally, staff recommende~d~thatthe BSU~:displaced at Dock Site #10 in
2001 be included in the proposed new multiple dock license. At the request of the applicant, the variance
application was withdrawn and the new multiple dock license application was continued to a future Board
Meeting.
· The applicant has proposed five changes tothe amended Proposed new multiple dOck license
application. They include: 1) Dock Site #3- maintain four BSU's at this dOCk site; however, reduce the
BSU dimensions from 10'x 20' to 8' x 16' at three of BSU's and 9'x 16' at the other BSU, 2) Dock Site
-2339-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ·,
Regular Board Meeting .:
April 10, 2002 Page 5
maintain two BSU's at this dock site; however~ increase the dimensions of BSU #1 from 10' x 24' to 12' x
32', 3) DockSite #14- increase the BSU's at this dock site from four to five~.with the new BSU having the
dimensions_ ~f !2! x.~2 (~e proposed increase of BSU's at thi~ dock site·includes the relocation of the
-I~U di~ia~d'
dimensions of BSU #1 from 10' x 20' to 10' x 24', and 5) Dock Site #23- maintain four BSU's at this dock
site; however, increase the dimensions of BSU#1 from 10' x 20'to 10'x 24'
· Code Section 2.015 allOws legal, non. conforming facilities to reconfigure, provided five requirements are
met. They include: 1) the application may not resultin an increase in. BSU's, 2) the application may not
result in an increase in the total square footage, of slips, associated, with BSU's as determined in
a~cerdancewith-subd~ 4-of-this Sec-tien~ 3)~eapplication-may-not-resulHn a lakewardextension~f-the
dock any further beyond 100' from. the 929.4 NGVD shoreline than the existing dock, 4),~the application
may not result in any further extension into non-conforming side setback areas than the· existing docks,
and 5) in the case of docks not in conformance with Section 2.01, subd. 2b)2) applicable to new facilities,
i) nc.new BSU's shall be located in the setback area without first securing a variance pursuant, to Section
1.07, ii) the application may not result in an increase in slip length opening toward non-conforming side
setback areas. ·
· Staff has reviewed the proposed application and believes that it complies with the requirements of Code
SectiOn 2,015. One consideration for:the Board in reviewing the proposed application was to minimize
beams of the three lakeward BSU's at Dock Site #3 to eight feet because of the dock use.width limitations
at this site. A number of the site plans for this facility are not to-scale and should be improved in the
future. The MN DNR was provided a copy of the proposed application in compliance with MN DNR,'
General Permit 97-6098, noting that they expressed no objections.
· Staff believed thatthe proposed new multiple d0c~ license application for the City of Minnetonka Beach
for the 2002 season met the requirements of Code. Staff would like the Board to consider making a
condition of the approval that revised, to-scale site plans for allsites be submitted by the applicant Prior to
the 2003 season. The Board should also consider refunding the $500 application fee for. the variance that
was withdrawn, noting that the breakdown of this fee includes a $250 base fee (non-refundable) and a
$250 depositfee (refundable).
Mr. Jim GasCh, a Minnetonka Beach City'Council Member, stated.that he believed the staff review pretty well
summed up the proposed application. He. entertained questionsor comments from the Board.
Babcock stated the boat storage at Dock Site #3 is.extremely tight because of the dock.layout and the limitations
of thewidth~.of the dock,use~area. He asked,if the City of MinnetOnka Beach.takes an active role in monitoring
boat sizes at dock sites within the city and if there are boats currently being storedatDock .Site #3,'that have a
beam wider than eight feet.
Gasch stated that the City of Minnetonka Beach has taken a more active role in monitoring boat sizes at their
dock~ nOting that ~he did nOt'believe that'Dock Site~ curren:ttyha'da.boat~with~a.beam wider than~eight~feet. He
added that there was a need to improve the proposed site plans so.that they~are~to.scale:~,',, ,
There being no:further comments, Foster closed the public: hearing at 7:45 ~p.m. .
Gilman arrived at 7:45 p.m, ~ ,
McMilan asked for clarification from Nybeck on the proposed vadance application that was withdrawn.
-2340-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting .
April 10, 2002 Page 6
Nybeck stated that after the application for variance from Code was. received, a public hearing was scheduled, a
public hearing notice was published in the Lakeshore Weekly news, and staff memorandum was prepared. The
' mcluest tO ~ithdmw ~e variance applicatio~ was made at a later date and pre~ented, to theBoard at the
scheduled public hearing.
Babcock stated that staff processed the variance application all the way to the public headng stage, noting that
the District had incurred a significant amount of expenses. He askedif the $250 base fee wouldcover the
expenses incurred bY the DiStrict in the processing of the variance application before it was Withdrawn.
Nybeck-stated that ~he believed-that the $250wOuld cover the expensesinCurred by the~Distdct, He advised the
Board that the $250 base fee is traditionally used for the expenses incurred by the District when a variance
application is submitted.
MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Nelson seconded to approve the new multiple dock licenSe application for the 2002
season, subject tothe applicant submitting revised, to-scale site 31aris for all docking Sites pdor to the
2003 season, and to refund the $250 variance deposit fee.
Babcock recommended a friendly amendment to the motion that would restrict beam to eight feet for the three
lakeward BSU's at Dock Site #3. Seuntjens and Nelson agreed to this.
VOTE:: Motion carried unanimously.
· Mr. Robert Stierna, variance application from LMCD Code for dock length requirements.
Foster opened the pubic: hearing at 7:50 p.m. He believed that the staff memo summarized the issues with the
proposed application and asked for comments from either the applicant or the pUblic.
Van Hercke asked for clarification of the proposed adjacent docks on the proposed site plan.
Mr. Bob Stiema, 1930 Shoreline Drive, stated that the proposed docks are the abutting property owner's docks,
noting that determining location is difficult because they are seasonal.
Nybeok stated that.identifiCation of the abutting,property owners' docks is required :asPart ofthe~variance
apPlication Process, noting that it allOwS the Board to, better eValuate the big picture relating to dockingin the
area of the proposed aPPlication, ~
Wert asked if the proposed dock is brand new.
Stienra stated that a dock has been installed at this site for.some years ara shorterdistance from shore,, noting
that there have been issues with water depths.
Foster stated that he was familiar with the area and that he believed the additional dock extension would not
have an impact on navigation or access to the neighbors docks. Boating in the area is not generally done
because of the shallow water depths and heavy infestations of milfoil in the area.
Harper added that docks in the near vicinity, Sailors Wodd, extend further out in the bay than the proposed site
plan.
-2341 -
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District .*~ .:.~ ~.
Regular Board Meeting ...... .:
April ,10, 2002 ~ ·Page 7
Seuntjens asked if the Board takes into consideration shorezone minimum-wake restrictions when reviewing
proposed 'variance appliCations. ,
.... Fo~t~i~te~ tl~i ~ b~iie~dthat ~OSt boaters staY aw~y from areas Of the la~e Where there a~ p~sical
hardships for proposed vadance applications. ~.~
Babcock stated that the shorezone for the proposed variance application would be 300' rather than 150~ noting
that the Code requires minimum-wake speeds within 150' from shore or structures within the lake, He believed
that the point raised by Seuntjens was valid.
There being no further comments, Foster closed the public headng at 7:54 p.m.
Nybeck stated that the City of~Orono and the MN DNR have expressed no objections to the proposed application.
MOTION: Gilman moved, McMillan seconded to direct attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for
approval of the Robed Stiema vadance apPlication from LMCD Code for dock length requirements.
Wert questioned if the Board wanted to consider language that address boat sizes or restriction on numbers at
the proposed site,.
Nybeck stated that the Distdct has previously restricted boat sizes as part of the approval of a dock length
variance application, citing one of the dock sites at Dancing Waters DOA.
The :consensus of. theBoard was not to restrict boat sizes'or the number of boats.
Babcock recommended a friendly amendment that would require the three boats to be stored at this dock to be
owned and.registered to themsidents at the site. Gilman and McMIIlan agreed to this friendly amendment.
VOTE: Motion carded unanimously.
Lafayette Ridge HOA, newmuttiple dock license application to recoC]figure a conforming multiple dock facility.
Foster oPened the public:,,headng at.7:59 P.m. He believed,that the., staff .memo summarized theisSues with the
proposed application and asked for comments from either the applicant or the public. There being no comments,
Fo~te~ clOsedi~he Pubtic headng~at 8:00p:m.
Babcock stated that he was aware of some lighting concerns associated with this facility and that he believed this
waS.the time to address ~em. ~He believe~/:~that a:lighting plan::~hat weuB illuminate the facility with~the lighting
source'not viSible:from thewater wOUld be"appropfiate~, utilizingshielding where needed,
Mr. Bruce Palmer, 3135 Lafayette Ridge Lane, believed that the light that was being referred to was a public
streetJight ..... '~
Foster stated that he believed that Excel Energy would work with the applicant to resolve lighting concerns raised
by the Board.
Nybeck stated thathe had some previous experience working with lighting .concerns with Excel Energy and that
he would attend a meeting ;with :them if it would beneficial for the: applicant.
-2342-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District .-. r? ~ .,
Regular Board Meeting .
Apdl tO, 201:)2 "page I~
MOTION: Gilman moved, Babcock seconded to approve the Lafayette Ridge HCA. new multiple dock.license for
the 2002 season, subject to the applicant submitting a revised lighting plan to reviewed by staff by the
end of the 2002 season
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
SAVE THE LAKE
A: Consideration of draft 2002 "Save the Lake" Budget.
McUillan stated that she had recently finalized the draft 2002 "Save the Lake" budget with Nybeck, noting
that this was the first year thatbudgeted expenditures were the same as budgeted revenues.: In the past,
budgeted revenues have exceeded budgeted expenditures. There are additional projects being funded in
2002 compared to past'years; citing the Water Patrol and solar buoy light projects. She asked for questions
or comments on the draft budget.
Van HerCke questioned whether the $30,000 budgeted for'solicited contributions in 2002 might be too high,
taking into consideration that actual contributions received in 2001 were $23,300.
Nybeck stated that there were formula problems in the draft budget for budgeted expenditures from 1999
through 2001. These past "Save the Lake" budgets also had budgeted expenditures the same as budgeted
revenue.
Foster complimented the efforts of UcMilan and stated that review of the draft budget might be more at the
next Board meeting since there'were formula problems in the budget spreadsheet;and.because it:was in the
handout folders.
Wert asked how the remaining funds received from the business community in 2001 is reflected in:the draft
2002 "Save the Lake" budget.
Nybeck stated that audit currently being prepared for 2001 will recognize the remaining funds from the
· business community contribution ~or the Water Patrol project as adeSignated fund~balance: The line item for
the 2002 Water Patrol takes into consideration that there will probably be a shortfall of voluntary contributions
~from the.member cities; with this ~Shortfaltbeing made~Up by thebUsiness.community'contdbution:~: ~-
Wert stated that the proposed budget could use an explanation"bn why:propoSed solicitations, in 2002 Save
the Lake" budget would increase to $30,000 in 2002 from $23,300 actually received in 2001.
· McMillan stated when analyzing sOlioltations receivedin 200~1~ theBoard shouldtakeinto :conSideration
solicitations received in early2002~cause they are aresult.of a letter senl out in:late 200t, A further
analysis of 2002 solicitation contributions might be appropriate, with a need to further update the database.
The consensus of the Board was to revise and update the 2002 "Save the Lake" budget and bdng it back for
review at the 4~24~02 Regular Meeting.
B. Additional Business.
McMillan stated that the "Save the Lake" lakescaping project waS~presented at a'recent Mound Planning
Commission meeting, noting that she.understood thatit was well receiVed based on preliminary feedback.
-2343-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ~ ~
Regular Board Meeting ~ ~ ~
Apq110/2002 Page9,
Burma stated that.he' believed that the/akeSCaping project was an opportunity =to edUcate.~,~e Mound
Planning ¢ommission:~ The p~sentation creatc~ a positive attitUde on~lakescaping alternatives, noting that
he has, had prelimina~.c0nversations W th the MoUnd Parks D rector onthe COn.pt of lakescap ng test sites
on city prope~y to educate the public.
McMillan stated that other Board members who believe the city they represent would like to review the
lakescaping project should contact her.
2. WATER STRUCTURES
B, Additional Business.
There Was nO additional business.
.!.
3, FINANCIAL
A. Audit'of'vouch'ers (3/16/02- 3/31/02) and (4/1/02 - 4/15/02).
Skramstad reviewed the audit of vouchers for payment as submitted.
MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Gilman seconded to approve the audit of vouchers for the periods of (3/16/02
- 3/3tt02) and:(411/02- 4/15/02) as submitted. ·
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
B. January and February financial summary and balance sheets.
Skramstad reviewed revenues and expenditures for the Administrative, Exotics,~and "Save the Lake"
· "budgets for January and February. This format is new from previous years. It includes a summary sheet
that takes into consideration budgeted revenues and budgeted expenditures for all three budgets. The
summary sheet in:thenew,format 'provides on a monthly basis the variance of budgeted.revenues and
expenditures; noting:those, additional details could be clarified if a specific BOard member desired.
The Beard complimented the.efforts of Skmmstad on the new monthly financial summary and,balance sheet;
however, a number of Board members stated that they would like the additional detailsup front,,so that they
can ~.,.tter undermtand the fu~anc a situation {of the,~Di~trict, The consensus of the Board, was that Board
members interested in fine tuning the format of the monthly financial summary and balance sheet should
coordinate their ~mmentsand suggestio~.~, with Sk~am~d,. ~, *,.
C~,~ Additional,.Business~ .-~
~There'was no,additional business ....
LAKE USE & RECREATION
C. Discussion of Board Inspection Tour of tributaries in proposed ordinance amendment.
. Foster stated that he had talked to rStaff.~and a tentative date of Wednesday, 5/15/02 at: around 5p.m. has
· been set.to visit the tribUtaries identified;in the proposed.erdina,,nce amendment that, wqp, d prohibit,motor zed
wate.roraff in ceAain parts of :Lake Minnetonka :: He questiened whether there was a need to visit.Painter's
Creek and he asked for feedback and comments from the Board on this proposed date.
-2344-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
April 4.0, 2002
There was no additional business.
,'Page 10
Theconsensus of the .Board was that there was a need to visit both Six Mile and ~Painter's: Creeks, whether it'
isby water ,and/or land~. The Board agreed to visit both tributaries on Wednesday~ 5/15/02~ at 5 p.m. The
Chair was authorized,_bythe Board to work with Nybeck on the fin. a! details of this ins~ction tour~
Additional Business.
EWMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE :
Nybeck updated the Board on the recent discussions on the "Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Out of Lake Minnetonka"
project. He advised the Board that the need for an action plan was discussed at the 3/8/02 EWM/Exotics Task
Force meeting and that a subsequent meeting was conducted with the MN DNR on the need to establish an
action plan and to encourage their participation. A letter has been forwarded to the MN DNR folow rig up on this
meeting regarding the use of MN DNR at selected public accesses in 2002 on a pilot program basis. He stated
that he would keep the Board informed on this project.
ADMINISTRATION
Nybeck stated that the new District Administrative Secretary, Gona Olson, had recently begun and that she was
doing a commendable job.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Nybeck made the following comments:
A copy of:the most recent, quadedy Executive Director Newsletter was included in ,the handout folders,
He 'advised :the Board that it had been sent out to the city administrators and mayors for alH4 member
cities, .~...; ' ...... :~ .
· Three newsPaPer articles pertaining to the Bistdct.were.included in the handout folders. They included an
article that updated the Proposed phOsphorOuS,free fertilizer legislation and:~oarticles that addressed
the moratorium ordinance amendment for the proposed tributary ordinance amendment.
~:HeWould,be participatingid a "Tonka Bay'Report, on Wednesday, 4t17/O2~ ;that would be aired on local
-The'~OlaHights that wer~ recently purchased by "Save th~ Lake". funds had ;resently a~/ed and he
· The unseasonably warm winter this past ~ea~o~:'caased::~b~e proble~§.at:liS~n~ed a~d Unli~nsed
deicing facilities around the lake. He reviewed the Code pertaining to deicing on Lake Minnetonka, noting
that a permit is not required after March 15~h and that there are few restriction~ iiit",th~':~arrent Cbde:'for
facilities that do not require a permit. There are a number of people who use the lake after the March 15th
date and he believed that it possibly should be moved back to a/atsi~;dat~:::i~d~:§ibl~:April 1st; or that there
should be more regulations tied in with the March 15th date. He believed that the Board might want to
discuss this at a future meeting. 'I ~ ~''':' ' ":;'~
Babcock stated that he lived between two commercial madnas and that access to good ice was impaired this
past widter be0ause Of deicing activities. He received some telephone'Calls about deicing activity that was taking
PlaCe atse'~sofi~i dock StCuctamS and som~:.d6iding'activity was"t~ki~§ pla~ before ~e~ March 15!h exemption.
He beheved that it m~ght be appropnate for tlie' D~stnct.to re. evaluate th6 pOliCY ~'rtainlng to deicing .activities.
-2345-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ·
Regular Board Meeting .:.
April "10~ 2002 Page
The BOard discussed a variety,of aspects pertaining to deicing on Lake Minnetonka. Some of.them included
~whetherdeicing should be allowed at seasona docksi the public safety concemsassociated,with deicing after
Ua[ch 15~th,.a~d the ~!~tinctio_n between permanent and seasonal doCks~ The consensus ~of the .Board waS.,for
Nybeck to write a rnem~ that aAai~ ~r:e~i ~i~in§'~:eg~iati~ ~i~ ~m~ poSSibl~' alte~ati~e' ~i~ti~nS~for
the Board to consider at a future meeting. ·
8. OLD BUSINESS
Distdct Newsletter
Van Hercke stated that she had prepared a preliminary proposal for Board discussion on the concept of a District
Newsletter for public relations purposes. She advised the Board that she had been in contact with DickOsgood
regarding the use of the Lake Minnetonka Association (LMA) list that includes a distribution of approximately
8,000 residences. One option for the Distdct to consider could involve a newsletter that is 8 1/2" by 11', double
sided, distributed twice a year. Costs for each newsletter would be approximately $8,000. This would include
rental of the LMA list, graphic design, copyrighting, printing and folding, and postage..A second~eption for the
District to consider could include the same one page 8 1/2" x 11" double sided newsletter, sent out quarterly.
The costs for each newsletter in this option would also be approximately $8,000. A third option for the Distdct to
consider could involve including the Distdct newsletter with the quarterly newsletter sent out by the LMA, noting
that there would be printing costs and any overages in postage of the LMA newsletter. A fourth option for the
District to consider could involve press releases in local newspapers or piggy backing in member city newsletters.
A fifth option for the District to consider could include a communication tool for the District on a PowerPoint
presentation that could be broadcast on local cable television.
The Board complimented the efforts of Van Hack on this project to date. The Board discussed how the local
cable companies and high schools could assist in the preparation of a District PowerPoint presentation. The
Board directed Van Hercke to continue collecting information on the possibility of a Distdct PowerPoint
presentation that summarized the pedinent rules on Lake Uinnetonka. The Board also directed Van Hercke to
continue collecting information on the possibility of a Distdct one-page newsletter that could be piggybacked with
member city newsletters. The Board also directed Van Hercke to check with the possibility of a regular District
column with the local newspapers.
Upland Farms Project
Skramstad asked for an update on the proposed Upland Farms project.
Knudsen stated that he understood the developer hasPrepared the voluntary Environmental Assessment
Worksheet and that it was currently being reviewed by the MCWD, the responsible govemmental unit.
9. NEW BUSINESS
Van Hercke stated that a letter had recently been forwarded to the city that she represents that included
discussion that she was unaware of. She believed that it would have been beneficial for her or other Board
members to get input in the process of preparation of these types of letters in the future.
Skramstad stated that he understood Howards Point Marina had submitted applications with the District to
expand the commercial facility in Shorewood by purchasing an abutting property. There are zoning issues for
Howards Point Madna to resolve with the City of Shorewood, noting that the applications submitted to the Distdct
would be before the Board for review in the near future.
-2346-
and that thls should be checked into further.
lO. ADJOURNMI::NT
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ,, ,
Regular Board Meeting
April 10' 2002 : page
Babcock stated that.he had been made aware that Howards Point Madna might be dry stacking boats on trailers
in their, parking :lot and launching them as an in/out service'i He believed that they are not authorized to dO~so
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:46 p.m.
AlbertO, Foster, Ohairman
Lili McMillan, Secretary
-2347-
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT'
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA
7:00 PM, Wednesday, May 8, 2002
TOnka BaY City H~II
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster
READING OF MINUTES- 4/24/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting ' '
PUBLIC.COMMENTs - Persons in attendance,, subjects not on agenda (5 min.)
CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items with a (*) will be approved in one motion
unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be
removed from the consent agenda.
WATER STRUCTURES
A) Foxhill Association, consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for approval of
variance application from LMCD Code for dock length requirements;
B) Chapman Place Marina, consideration of 2002 renewal, without change,
multiple dock license application;
c)
D)
(*) 2002 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends approval of 2002 renewal
without change applications for Meadowbrook Boat Club, City of Mound, and
West Point Place HOA;
(*) City of Minnetonka, staff recommends full refund of $250 deposit for dock
length variance application;
C) Additional Business;
2. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE
A) Evaluation of Truck Hauling Bids for the 2002 EWM Harvesting Program;
B) Update on "Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Out of Lake Minnetonka" project;
C) Additional Business;
FINANCIAL
A) Audit of vouchers (5/1/02 - 5/15/02);
B) March financial summary and balance sheet;
-2348-
C) Review of timetable to consider'draft 2003 LMCD Budget (handout);
D) Additional Business;
,.
ADMINISTRATION
A) (*) LMCIT Liability Insurance, staff recommends that the Board do not waiVe
the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes
466.O4;
B) Additional Business;
LAKE USE & RECREATION ·
A. (*) 2002 Liquor Licenses, staff recommends approval of renewal Wine and
Nomlnto×icating Liquor License applications for the charter boats, Fantasia,
Holiday Fair, and Holiday Fair II;
B. Additional Business;
6. SAVE THE LAKE
7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
8. OLD BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
10.ADJOURNMENT
-2349-
LAKE MINNETONKA ~CONSERVATION DISTRICT
7:00 PM. Wednesday, April 24, 2002
Tonka Bay City Hall
DRAF.T
CALL TO ORDER
Foster called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members present~ Bert Foster, Deephaven; Craig Nel~0n SPring Park; Lili UcMillan, Orono; Tom Skramstad,
Shorewo0d; Orv Burma, Mound; Paul Knudsen, Uinnetrista; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka.
Also present: Ron Batty, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, ExecutiVe DireCtor; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician.
Members absent: Bob:Ambrose, Wayzata; DoUg Babcock, Tonka Bay; Tom Gilman ~'Excelsior Tom Seuntjens,
Minnetonka Beach; SheldOn Wed; Greenwood. Victoda has no appointed' Board member.
CHAIR ANNoUNCMENTS, Chair Foster
Foster announced that,the Board inspection tour to v s t the tributaries identified in the draft ordinance amendment
that would prohibit the 'use of motorized watercraft was scheduled for WedneSday, May 15~, Further details of this
tour w be forwarded in the near future after they'have been finalized.
READING OF MINUTES. 4/10/02 LMCD Regular Board Meeting
MOTION: Nelson moved, Skramstad seconded to approve the minutes from the 4/10/02 Regular Board Meeting
as Submitted.
VOTE:
Motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC COMMENTS- Persons in attendance, subjects not on the agenda.
There were no Comments from 'the public on subjects not on the agenda.
· Abdo, Abdo, Eick & Meyers, discussion of draft 2001 LMCD Audit.
Foster in'troduced steve MC~onaid who oversaw Oe 2001 'i~MCD AUdifPtocess. He wei~0med McDonald on
behalf of the Board and asked for an overview.
McDonald made the following comments on the draft 2001 LMCD Audit:
One of the main fS~use~:'~Sf:~ihe audit"iS to give: a ~ualified oPinion':baSed o:A the finan(~'i'~i re~rds of the
District. The opinion'does not include ~ iriveti'to~ bf fiXed' ~ssets,' SUch aS th~ harveSte~'a~d office
equipment, noting that this is common for smaller governmental organizations.
Another focus of the audit is to evaluate ntemal controls of the District, especially the segregation of
%CoUnt'ing responsibiiiiies. Thisis di~C~lt' to deal With internally at (he' st~ff;level becaus~ 5f the'iimited
staff. Outside controls, including contractual bookkeeping and an active Treasurer, assists in addressing
this.
-2350-
Lake Minnet°nka Conservation District
Regular BOard'Meeting
April 24, 2002 Page 2
· The audit also looked into compliance by the:DiStriCt with laws, regulations, contracts, and bidding. He
reported no instances of non-conformance.
Skramstad stated that there were a limited '~u~'ber'~f year-end adjustments by the auditor to the monthly
financial summary and balance sheets prepared by the bookkeeper for review by the Board.
McDonald continued his comments:
· The General Fund balance as of 12/31/01 was $125,684, an increase of $21,954 from the previous year.
This represents approximately 44% of current year expenditures, below the six-month reserve policy.for
the District agreed to by the member cities. The General Fund balance has remained relatively stable as
reflected in the table in the Management Letter.
· The SPecial Revenue Fund balance, which Consists of Save the Lake, New Equipment AcquiSition,
EuraSian Milfoil, and EqUipment Replacembnt, was $577,415. There was a decrease in the New
Equipment Acguisition fund in 2001 dueto the purchase of the new pick-up and the enclosed trailer for
the harvesting program. There was an increase of $19,975 tO (he Eurasian MilfOil fund during 2001,
primarily due t03ower levels of activity and lower trucking costs. The Eurasian Milfoil fund baianCe of
$67,260 represents approximately 73% of current year expenditures. The Board has established a 12-
month reserve policy for the Eurasian Milfoil fund balance and might want to analyze'Whether this reserve
level is sufficient or should be adjusted,
· He reviewed Governmenta! Accounting Standards. (GASB) Statement Number 34 and how it applies to
the District. He stated that GASB Number 34 will cha~ge the way that financial information will be
presented for governments, especially at the city, county, and state levels. This will require the District to
get a better handle on its fixed assets and to provide for depreciation of them.
· He entertained questions or comments from the Board.
Skramstad stated that GASB Number 34 will require the DiStrict to define the term capital asset, to establish a list
of capital assets, and to establish a depreciation schedule for these capital assets.
Foster asked for a general overview from McDonald on the financial status of the District.
McDonald stated that his comments on the General and Eurasian Milfoil fund balances are reflected in the
Management Letter, noting that these levels have remained, relatively stab e o~er the years, The remaining funds
for the Water Patrol project for 2002 have been established as designated in the General and Save the Lake fund
balances as designated for this purpose. .
Foster thanked UcDona d on beha [,of.the Board, for.the preparation of the 2001 LMCD Audit.. The Board
acCepted ihe 2001~'i~MCD AUSit ~s submitted. _. .... '
PUBLIC HEARING
· City o[.Minnetonka, new multip e dock licenSe,, launching ramp, and va?nce aPpl cat OhS to 1) construct 30
BOat ~(°r&g~i units (~isu;~),'i2)install a neW pubii'c laUnching ramp, and 3)'varia%e frOm LMCD C°de fOr dock
length requirements
Foster Opened the pUbliC hearing at 7:13 p:im, He asked'staff for background on the proposed apPlications.
NYbeck made the follOWing CommentS:
-2351 -
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
April 24, 2002
Page 3
· New multiple dock license, public launching rampi~and va'fiance applications have been submitted for
Board consideration forthree purposes: 1)~nstruction of 30 BSU's, 2)"the installation of a new public
launching ramp, and 3) variance from Code for dock length requirements.
· The applications submitted are a result of the MN DNR public access' Planned at this site, which was
previ0Usl~, Grays Bay Marina. 'Fhis site was previoiJ~ly a legal, non,conforming facility for density, side
setbac, k, and dock length Code requirements. It was'approved for 155 BSU's with approximately 550' of
929.4 NGVD shoreline, with a' BSU density of 1!4~. This' faCility alSO had an approved launching ramp for
private purposes~ noting that it ~as uSed~frequer~tly by the public.
· The applicant has dedicated .1 ;756' of non,continuouS shoreline, from four separate sites, for the
proposed applications that would result in a BSU density of 1:59'. Coi:te allbWS for O'rfe. BSU for each 50'
of cOntinuous shoreline, With the exception that municipalities are allowed to consolidate non-continuous
shoreline for density purposeS, provided the docks coml~ly'with other Code.reqUirements~
· COde SeCtion 2.03, subd. 1 states tha't no person may locate, construct, stall or maih'tain a multiple dock
or mooring area, or a commercial dO(~k oi~ a launching tamp on the shoreline of the Lake, or in the waters
of the Lake, unless licensed by the Board to do sO. The aPPlicant has sUbmittedn~w multiple dock
license and launching ramp'applicati0ns for the multip e doCk facility, the MN DNR launct~ing ramp, and
the make,ready docks aSSOciated with the launching ramp.
· Code Section 2.0I, subd. 1 prohibitS a person from using any area of the Lake oUtSide an authorized
dock use area for dOcking and storage of Watercraftl The new mUltiPle dock facility, the new public
launching ramp, arid the make-ready doCkS proposed in the site plan need t0 be cohtained within the
authorized dock use area established for this 'site. The proposed site plan COmplies with minimum side
setback requirements from the eastern and.:Westem extended side site lines~~
Foster stated that he believed that the 929.4 NGVD contour line on the prOposed Site plar~ was cOnfusing
because it appeared to be located in the water.
Mr. Jeff Schoenbaueri representing' the applicant, stated that the contour line being referenced by Foster was the
actual 929.4 NGVD Shoreline at the site. He added that the 929.4 NGVD contour line cOuld be clarified if that
was desired of the. Board.
Nybeck stated that three elements of the proposed site plan extend Out beyond 100' from the 929,4 NGVD
shoreline. First, the gas dock and adjacent service slip would extend less than 125' from shoreline; however, the
~;ode ~allows~for ,this: provided that-it is used strictlY~for fuelsales a~d.~mlated services. Se~nd, BSU 30 :woUld
extend less than 125' from the Shoreline;~h'0wever.~ the Code allows~ the authorized d~k u§e ~ama for faC. ilities
owned and operated by state, county or local law enforcement agencies to extend up to 125' from the 929.4
NGVD shoreline'~. Third,..BSU~s :28 and'29; which are'proposed for rental purposes,: would partiallY extend 'Out
beyond the 100' contour line from 929.4 NGVD shoreline.
Schoenbauer made the following comments:
· ' The slip that is proposed for MN DNR enforcement purposes, BSU 30, was a late request from the MN
DNE:~nd the number of BSU's,on the proP0sed sire plan iNaSid'¢rease~.from28to 30/The;MN 'DNR
curre'~tly'h-a~ a.l~oat on Lake Ml~heto'nka:in st; AlbanS. Bay,an~l 'they.ha~e: re'quested :~e,oppo~tunity to
have another enforcement boat on Lake Minnetonka in the Grays I~ay area~.'The Henn'epin¢o~ty
Shedffs Water PatrOl WO~ld have access to ,the MN DNR b0at for law.enforcement purposes and he
believed that BSU 29 could be used in the future by the Water Patrol if they had a desire to store a boat at
the dock~,, ' ', · ....
· The original configuration included two dock structures that would be fillY contained'~ithin the authorized
dock area for this site, excluding the gas dock that would not have extended beyond 125' from the 929.4
-2352-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting]
April 24i 2002 Page 4
NGVD shoreline, The re,~ised site plan would have one entrancepoint rather than two, noting that
operations and maintenance staff preferred it because it wou d improve security and operational aspects.
Nybeck continued his comments:
· The applicant has submitted an application for variance from Code for dock length requirements at BSU's
28 and 29 that padially extend out beyond 100' from the,929.4 NGVD shoreline, He expressed a concern
that the proposed physical hardship was not consistent with past d°ck length variances granted by the
Board and that it was created not by application of the Code. One a temative, for the Board to consider
would be to maintain the grandfathered "envelope" that pre,existed at Grays Bay Marina and reconflgure
the facility under Code Section 2.015.
· Code Section 2.015 allows legal, non-conforming facilities to reconfigure provided a number of
requirements am:met. They include: 1) the application may not result in an increase in BSU's, 2) the
application may~not result in an increase in total square footage associated with BSU's as determined in
accordance with subd. 4 of.~his section, 3) the application may not result in a lakeward extension of the
dock further beyond 100' from the shoreline than the existing dock, 4) the application may not result in any
further extension into nomconforming side setback areas than the exist ng dock, and 5) in the case of
docks not in conformance with the provisions of Section 2.01, subd. 2b)2) applicable to new facilities: i) no
new BSU's sha! be. located in .the side setbackarea without first secudng a variance pursuant to Section
!.07, and ii) the application may not result in an increase in slip length of any slips opening toward the
non-conforming .,side setback areas. Staff has evaluated the proposed site plan and believed that it
complied with all requirements of this Code Section.
· The MN DNR was provided a copy of the proposed applications in compliance with the MN DNR General
Permit 97-6098. They stated that they had close contact on the preparation of the proposed site plan and
that they had no objections to it.
· He was not prepared to make a recommendation on the proposed applications because BSU's 28 and 29
were proposed to extend beyond 100' from the 929.4 NGVD shoreline. If the Board had the desire to
approve site as proposed, staff believed that it would make more sense to approve it utilizing Code
Section ~2,015 rather than Code Section 1,07 because it appears that a physic:al hardship is lacking. He
concluded that he had discussed the concept of utilizing Code Section 2.015 to consider the proposed
site plan with Charlie LeFevere and that he was comfortable that the public hearing notice advertised for
this meeting was sufficient to allow the Board to consider th s
Batty concurred ,that LeFevem wassatisfied that the pub! c hearing not ce advertised for this meeting was
sufficient for~he Board to consider the proposed application utilizing Code Section 2.015. ~,
Foster asked if there were comments or questions from the Board on the proposed applications.
Skramstad asked if it was possible to adjust the alignment of the proposed dock to bdng the two BSU's in
question within 100' from the 929.4 NGVD shoreline.
Schoenbauer stated that. adjustments to the proposed dock were considered; however, any adjustment would
impede navigat on.between.adjacent board ng dock and.the gas~.dock itself; The boarding dock will be used for
transient:dock ng purposes,at the public access facil!.ty to'improve efficiency, noting that,they were included in the
design of the public access aspect of the site plan at the request of the ,MN DNR; ~
Suerth asked Schoenbauer if ground contours and water depths were taken into consideration in the proposed
site plan to determine~whether the proposed facility could be moved in closer to the929.4 NGVD shoreline.
-2353-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
April 24, 2002 Page 5
Schoenbauer stated that the preposed site plan took into consideration maintaining the dock as close to the
shoreline and the documentation that water depths were sufficient for the inner slips that open towards the
shoreline.
Foster stated that Grays Bay Marina had a number of BSU's that were located adjacent to the 929.4 NGVD
shoreline.
Schoenbauer stated that the City of Minnetonka kept in mind the 100' Code length limitation from the 929.4
NGVD shoreline in the preparation of the proposed site plan. If the two additional slips that were added late in
the process for law enforcement purposes were not part of the proposed site plan, he believed that they would
not have submitted the application for variance from Code.
Foster asked for the size of the proposed BSU's,
Schoenbauer stated that the size of the BSU's would be 11.5' wide and 26' long.
Foster asked if the shortening of the finger between BSU 28 and 29 could be considered to ensure that the dock
falls within the 100' length limitation allowed by Code.
Nybeck stated that 100' length limitation allowed by Code applies to boat storage in addition to dock structure. If
the applicant were agreeable to shortening the length of the finger between 28 and 29 so that it complies with the
100' contour line, they would also need to limit the size of the boats so that they are contained within the
authorized dock use area.
McMillan asked if the City of Minnetonka was comfortable with the Board considering the proposed site plan
utilizing Code Section 2.015,
Schoenbauer stated that the City of Minnetonka was comfortable considering the proposed site plan utilizing
Code Section 2.015. The intent of the proposed dock is to generate enough revenue to maintain and provide
enough security for the facility as agreed to with the abutting neighborhoods. If the Board does not want to
approve the proposed site plan because two law enforcement BSU's extend out slightly beyond the 100' contour
line, the MN DNR is aware that these two BSU's may not be constructed.
Foster asked for clarification of the two adjacent BSU's east of the gas dock,
Schoenbauer stated that these two BSU's would be left open and would allow for servicing of the gas dock.
Foster stated that he believed that it would be possible to eliminate these two BSU's, to realign the dock
configuration, and to bring the proposed dock within the 100' contour from the 929.4 NGVD shoreline.
Schoenbauer stated that if the walkway to the east was moved closer to shore to bring the two BSU's 28 and 29
within the 100' contour, it would reduce the width of BSU 3 and make it an unusable slip.
McMilian asked Nybeck how utilizing Code Section 2.015 would impact future applications by the City of
Minnetonka at this dock site.
Nybeck stated that if the proposed site plan were approved utilizing Code Section 2.015, it would restrict the
number of BSU's and the envelope established beyond the 100' contour line for future applications. If the City of
Minnetonka wanted to expand the number of BSU's in the future, it would require them to make application to
-2354-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
. · Regular Board IVleeting
April 24, 2002 Page 6
make it conforming facility, including bringing the dock within the 100' contour line unless they have an
application for variance from Code approved by the District,
Schoenbauer stated that expansion of the dock in the future was not practical because of space and parking
concerns.
McMillan stated that she believed the proposed site plan is a groat example on why the "envelope" concept
ordinance was adopted by the District.
Burma stated that he believed that the geometrics of moving the dock closer into shoreline within the 100' NGVD
shoreline was not as easy as it appears, especially since the applicant has stated that it would impede navigation
for the inner slips on the west end of the dock between the gas dock and the adjacent boarding dock for the
public access,
Foster stated that he would prefer to consider the proposed site plan utilizing a new multiple dock license
application to make the facility conforming to Code rather than utilizing the pre-existed grandfathered rights from
Grays Bay Marina,
Schoenbauer stated that the City of Minnetonka would prefer to utilize Code Section 2.015 to allow them to
ensure that boat movement in and out from the facility works, yet, minimize the amount of the proposed site plan
that does not comply with Code that defines an authorized dock use area. He expressed concern about
constructing a dock that has restricted space that would need to be addressed in the future.
Harper reminded the Board that the two BSU's on the proposed site plan that did not comply with Code were 28
and 29.
Knudsen asked how far the finger between BSU 29 and 30 extended out beyond the 100' contour line.
Schoenbauer estimated that the finger would extend approximately six feet out beyond the 100' contour line,
Mr. James Rippetoe, 17200 Grays Bay Bivd., stated that he was the abutting property owner to the east. He
recommended revising the proposed site plan so that BSU's open from the main walkway from the building on
shore and to place BSU's along the shoreline similar to what existed at Grays Bay Marina. He expressed
concern about BSU's that would have navigation opening towards his property and how they could end up on an
island in the area. Milfoil in the area is a problem and he believed that the revised site plan he recommended
would be better suited to address fragmented milfoil issues.
Foster asked if the revised site plan referenced by Rippetoe was communicated to the City of Minnetonka.
Rippetoe stated that he did not participate on the Grays Bay Task Force and that he believed he had a number of
good ideas that could have been communicated. He believed that the proposed site plan being considered by
the Board had been prepared within the last month.
Schoenbauer stated that the City of Minnetonka has given a great deal of consideration to the various docking
configuration alternatives, keeping in mind Code side setback requirements. At this time, he believed that the
City of Minnetonka would not prefer to look into other docking configurations because they believed the proposed
site plan was best suited for the operations and maintenance. The public input on the proposed project'has been
ongoing for approximately four years and they would like to have the proposed site plan considered by the Board
utilizing Code Section 2.015. He concurred that the proposed site plan had been changed recently; however, he
-2355-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
April 24, 2002 Page 7
believed that the City of Uinnetonka had the opportunity to makes changes with the dynamics of the site and
challenges that need to be addressed.
Rippetoe expressed concem about the BSU at the proposed site plan for law enfomement in medical emergency
situations. He believed that one of the docks along the shoreline would be more appropriate.
Foster stated that he believed that the proposed site plan would allow the public to unload passengers closer to
the shoreline for emergency purposes, possibly the boarding docks. The proposed BSU for law enforcement
appears to be only for storage purposes, not medical emergencies.
Rippetoe concluded that he did not have problems with the proposed number of BSU's; however, he had concern
about the proposed site plan and the concept of boats navigating from the dock towards his authorized dock use
area.
There being no further comments, Foster closed the public hearing at 8:10 p.m.
Foster stated that he had concern about the proposed site plan being generated in the last 30 days and the fact
that the Grays Bay Task Force had not reviewed and commented on it. He preferred the applicant re-evaluating
the proposed site plan to minimize impact on the abutting property owner to the east and to have it Comply with
Code that defines an authorized dock use area. He concluded that although he had these concerns, he was
supportive of the proposed public access facility.
Van Hercke stated that she should like to have the applicant cladfy the 929.4 NGVD contour line that was raised
by Foster dudng the public hearing.
Schoenbauer stated that the 929,4 NGVD contour line could be clarified; however, it appears to be a moot point
because they would like the proposed site plan considered under Code Section 2.015. If the intent of the Board
was to send the site plan back to the City of Minnetonka for further review, he believed that the proposed site
plan brought back in the future would generally remain the same because he believed that due diligence had
been exhausted. He concluded that time is of the essence because the docks are the remaining package of the
project that has not taken advantage of the current bidding environment.
Nelson stated that he would prefer that the proposed dock be brought into compliance with LMCD Code. If the
City of Minnetonka has ownership of the proposed site, it appears that they could request the Board to consider
the proposed site plan under Code Section 2.015.
Schoenbauer re-stated that he would like the Board to consider the proposed site plan utilizing Code Section
2.015. He added that he believed that there had been communication with Mr. Rippetoe on the proposed site
plan; however, he was unaware of what was discussed. The proposed site plan that abuts the extended side site
line with Mr. Rippetoe meets the Code for side setback requirements, 30'.
McMillan stated that there might be a better dock configuration that would address the concerns of the neighbor
to the east; however, the proposed site plan would meet minimum side setback requirements. She believed that
the proposed dock plan would meet Code requirements that would allow the Board to allow them to re-configure
the pre-existing non-conforming facility and bring it closer to conforming with Code.
Nybeck stated that one question he had about utilizing Code Section 2.015 is whether there was a conversion of
use from Grays Bay Marina to the proposed use by the City of Uinnetonka. Based on definitions of "commercial"
uses in the Code and consulting with LeFevere, he concluded that there appears not to be a conversion of use.
-2356-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
April ,24;~ 2002
Page 8
Burma stated that he would support reviewing the proposed site plan under Code:Section 2.015 .for a variety of
reasons. He believed that it allows for two open BSU's for law enforcement purposes, it addresses the needs of
staff, it greatly reduces the non.conformity of the previous site, the "envelope concept" ordinance greatly reduces
the chances of setting an undesired precedent, and it complies with minimum side setback requirements that are
established for navigational purposes.
Knudsen stated that if he.were the abutting neighbor to the east, he would be supportive of the proposed site
plan because of the reduction of BSU's and the amount of doCk structure in the lake.
MOTION: McMillan moved, Van Hercke seconded to approve the City of Minnetonka new multiple dock license
and public launching ramp license application for the 2003 season, utilizing Code Section 2.015.~
Foster recommended a friendly amendment to further evaluate the 929.4 NGVD shoreline at the site. McMillan
and Van Hercked agree to this.
VOTE: Ayes (7), Nayes (1, Foster); motion carried.
Foster stated that he would like to move agenda item lA ahead of the Foxhill Association public hearing because
the applicant was in attendance and because he believed that the agenda item was relatively simple. The
consensus of the Board was to move agenda item lA ahead of the Foxhill Association public heating.
WATER STRUCTURES
A. Robert Stierna, consideration of Findings of Fact and Order for approval of variance application from LMCD
Code for dock length requirements.
Foster asked if there were comments from the Board on the draft Findings of Fact or he entertained a motion
on it,
MOTION: Nelson moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the
Robert Stierna variance application from LMCD Code for dock length requirements,
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously,
PUBLIC HEARINO
·
Foxhill Association, new multiple dock license aPplication to: 1) reconflgure a non,conforming facilitY, and 2)
vadance:from bMOD Code for docklength and side setback requirements.
Foster opened the PBbic hearingat 8:39 p:m. He asked staff for background on the proposed applications.
Nybeck made the following comments:
· Tl~e applicant has submitted application for a new mUltiPle dock license and varianCe from COde for its
mul[iple dock facility in the City of Orono' on smith'S:Bay. ThefaCility is currently approved for 13 BSU's
on 294' of continuous shoreline, With a BSU densitY Of 1:23'. They are considered a legal, non,
conforming facility because theY 'haVe a BSU denSity that exceeds the 1:50' General RUle.
· Multiple dock licenses were approved by the District for this facility since the mid 1970's with 16 BSU's. In
1978', new multiple dock license and doCk length.vadance applications were approved for'the facility at
the 9/28P8Board meeting. The facility continued to be approved for 16 BSU'S tl~rough the 1985 Season.
-2357-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation ~!,a[r~!ct
Regular Board Meeting~ .~;¥.:~-.,
April 24~- 2002 ,~
~-~ ~ ' ~' ' Page9
Prior to the 1.986 season for unknown reasons, the applicant reduced the number of approved BSU's
down to:~.t~3, and this continued through the2000 season, Prior to the 2001 season, the applicant
indi~ated.:..th.at.tb%y~wou d like to re.establish the 16 BSU's approye, d .in 1978 and proposed to achieve this
through a.:rene~a,~. Without change, multiple dock license apPl Cat on, At the 3/14/01 Board.meeting, the
applicantpgmed to amend the application to 13 BSU's for the 2001 season and they were, informed by
the Board~that a new multiple dock license application, with public hearing, was required fo~ the Board to
consider t~e request tQre~establish 16 BSU's at the facility~
· Msi Melan.!eFles'Sner, F°Xhill Association President, has requested action by the Board on four items: 1)
approve I~6.BSU's for exclusive use of homeowners, and Provides that non-use of a BSU in a particular
year does not constitute an. abando.n, ment or waiver of rights to 16 BSU's for the Association, 2) amend
the 9/28/78 Vadance Order granted by the LMCD to Foxhill Assoc aton to allow dock structure to be
reconfigured, noting that the reconfigured dock would maintain the existing 20' setback and would be
shorter than the length approved in the 1978 variance, 3) calculate and bill the Association for the non-
payment of the BSU's for the period since 1986, and 4) approve.the proposed 2002 new multiple dock
license application.
· Code Section 2.10 states that from and after 5/3/78, docks, moorings, and other structures in the Lake
shall be in conformity with the provisions of this Code except as otherwise provided. It further states that
no provision of this' Cqdewh.ch grants non.conforming status to any structure on the Lake shal be
deemed to create any vested rights and all structures shall remain subject to future regulation by the
District !rn the public intereSt. The Code states that a use which is non-conforming under the terms of this
Section may not be expanded. He stated that staff was unclear on whether the request to increase
approved.BSU's.~rom 13 to 16 was an expansion of.a non-conform ng use.. One consideration for the
Board was that the applicant was unaware of the BSU rights that they Were.giving up prior to the t986
season because Orono Resolution Numbers 1042 and 1043 only required the Association to renew
annual y the number of BSU's that they planned to instal each season. A second consideration was that
the three BSU's have been abandoned since th,e.1986 season and the request is an expansion of a non-
conforming use.; He referenced Minnesota State Statute 462.357 that outlined procedures for Minnesota
land zoning principles and the concept that abandonment could be interpreted after a.pedod of more than
one year. Staff was unclear on the interpretation of this Code Section and believed that this was a policy
decision for the Board to make.
· ~- Code Section 2.,01, sUbd.1 prohibits a person from using any area of the Lake outside an authorized dock
use area for docking and storage of watercraft. The proposed facility complies with minimum side
setback requirements fo.r the faqi !ty,i::20, bpcause t6 BSU's w~m approved, prior'to 1978 when ~e Code
required doubling of setbacks for mUltiple dock facilities that abut non-multiple dock facilities. The facility
does not.comp y with Code for dock length; howeyer, the vadance granted in .~ 978-address~ this~
· Code Section 2.03, subd. 1, mqu re~, mult p.e dock.~aci it es on Lake M ~n~et0nka.to be apprQved by.the
Board. The applicant has submitted a new multiple dock license application for the proposed facility.
· Code Sec!io~ 2~0! ~allows legal.,, non-confo~ing~ac lities.to reconfigure,provided a number of
requ rements a~e met. They include:, 1)the app!icat on .may, not result, in an increase in BSU%, 2).the
application may not result in an increase in total square footage associated with BSU's as determined in
accordance w th. subd 4 of this section, 3) the~appl cat onmay not resu!t in a lakeward~extension of the
*dock fu!;the~-beyond~lO0' from theshore ne,thanthe existing dock, 4)~the application:rnaynot result in
.:any further extension into non-conforming setback areas than the. e~ist, pg dock, and 5)inthe cas,e of
docks not in conformance with the provisions of Section 2.01, subd. 2b)2) applicable to new facilities: i) no
new BSU's shall be located in'the.side setback area without, first securing a vadance pursuant to .Section
1.07, and ii) the application may not result in an increase in slip length of anyslips opening toward the
.not3~conformings de.setback areas..-If.the Board allows the :appl.cant to.expand its approved BSU's to 16,
' they would comply w th all of these, requirements with one possible exception. Some of the proposed
-2358-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
April 24, 2002
Page '10
changes are ot~tside the "envelope" established by the '1978 Variance Orderl however, the Board might
want to consider the proposed enveloPe'because the structure woUld be mOved closer to shore,
Code SeCtion 1.07 allows the Board to consider.appliCations for variance from Code'provided that the
aPPlicant can document that the application of COde causes them a practical difficulty or a physical
hardship. The variance granted in 1978 established a physical hardship of shalloWwater for the dock
length VarianCe and staff believed it was still valid.
The City of Orono and the MD DNR were provided a copy of:the proposed applications in compliance with
MN DNR General Permit 97-6098. The City of Orono haS stated that the applicant has been in
conformance with past city approvals and they recommended approval, of the new configuration with a
maximum of 16 BSU's. The MN DNR expressed no objections to the prOposed applications.
Staff was not prepared to make a recommendation because thereWere two policy issues that needed to
be addressed by the Board. First, was the request to increase BSU's from 13 to 16 an expansion of a
non-conforming use, taking into consideration it could set undesired lakeWide precedent. Second, would
the proposed site plan for 16 BSU's comply with the:requirements of. Code Section 2.015, especially those
changes out beyond 100' from the 929.4' NGVD shoreline.
He entertained questions or comments from the Board.
Mr. Peter Beck,-legal representative for the applicant, stated that he generally concurred with comments made by
Nybeck. MS, Melanie Flessner arid Garfield Clark were also in attendance r. epresenting the applicant. He
believed that the request for variance from Code was necessary tO.confirm that the variance granted in 1978 still
existed today and that, the granting of 16 BSU"s would not create undesired.-precedent, The dock at the facility
has existed since 1969 and is to be used exclusively by the homeowners and tied to the number'Of homes
constructed, This was confirmed when he conducted a preliminary review of the Board meeting minutes in 1978,
For Unknown reasons in ~1986, the number of BSU's applied for by.~the Association was 13 and he believed that it
was a simple mistake ahd that it had been carded forWard, He believed that.there nev~er was an intent to
abandon the approVed 16 BSU's in 1978:to the 13 [hat is currently approved._ He concluded that he believed the
request is re-affirm the 16 BSU's approved in 1978 and that his clients would, be Willing to enter into an
agreement Summarizing this for future reference. He entedained questions or comments from the Board.
Suerth asked why the Association was requesting 16 BSU's when there are only 14 properties with houses
constructed 'on them.
Beck stated that the intent was to cladfy that 16 BSU's were approVed for the multiple dock facility,
Skramstad stated he believed that.it waS clear that the applicant intended, to have one boat for each of the 16
properties in the development an'd 'that the reduction of BSUts to 13.'was a miSunderstanding.
Beck reminded the Board that the Association was agreeable to reimbursing the District for nompayment of the
three BSU~S since 1986. He asked for Bbard confirmation of the fo'ur requests in'the Flessner letter.
Mr. LeO Bulloch, 1160 Heritage Lane, stated that he had lived on the lake for most of his life; =h0wever, not in
Foxhill Association. He pointed oUt tha't hb did nOt'belieVe.that reduCtion of three BSU's~by the ASsociation in
1986 should qualify as an abandonment.
There being no further business, FoSte¢ CloSed the public hearing at 9:09 p.m,
Foster stated that he supported the proposed applications because he believed that it would Correct a previously
made mistake when grandfathered rights were not cleady defined to the applicant some years ago. He believed
-2359-
Lake Mi~netonka..'Conserva*tiOn District *-'* .....
Regular Board Meeting '~ ~"~
April 24, 2002 Page 11
that is currently being done by current staff and that approving the request would not set undesired precedent.
He supported the proposed plan to bring the dock length closer to shoreline, although there are some changes
proPOSed out beyS'nd 100' ·from Shoreline outside the envelope of'the 1978 vanance granted. He suggested that
District should take up tt~e offer to pay back fees of the three BSU's backto 1986. He concluded-tt'iat there was
not a need for a formalized special agreement as proposed by the applicant.
Nybeck stated'tt~at any ~'~roval by the Board at this meeting WOuld inclU~e directing the attorney to prepare
Findings of Fact and Order~for approval of the dock length variance application. Any text or dialogue that the
Board believed would be beneficial could be included in the Findings. He cladfied that need for the variance
application was that changes were proposed out beyond 100' from the shoreline to the 1978 variance order.
McMillan concurred with FOster that any agreement that might need to be made between'the applicant and the
District should be prepared bY LeFevere.
Van Hercke stated in 2001 when the applicant had their facility approved for 13 BSU's, Board member Babcock
expressed concern about District considering approval of 16 BSU's in the future. She asked for clarification on
what were the concerns of Babcock.
Fostei: Stated he believed that Babcock had a different philosophy than himself and that the three BSUs should
be considered abandoned at the facility because of the number of years they have been approved at 13 rather
than 16.
MOTION: Skramstad moved, McMillan seconded to approve the new multiple dock license application for 16
BSU's for the 2002 season and to direct the attomey to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for
approval of the dock length vadance application, subject to the applicant making back payment for the
three BSU's in question back to 1986.
McUillan recommended a friendly amendment to the motion that would include language in the Findings that the
side setback requirements for the dock outside the 100' contour from shoreline are grandfathered from the Code
that requires doubling when a multiple dock abuts a non-multiple dock facility. Skramstad agreed to this.
Van Hercke questioned whether the District should be collecting back payment of fees for the three BSU's back
to the 1986. The consensus of the Board was to back license of the three BSU's back to the 1986 season.
VOTE: Motion carried ~unanimously.
The meeting was recessed at 9:19 p.m. and re-convened at 9:25 p.m.
:WATER .STRUCTURES ,~ .... ~'
B. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
2. SAVE THE LAKE
A, Consideration of draft 2002 "Save the Lake" Budget.
McMitlan stated that she. had updated the draft 2002 "Save the Lake" Budget to address the comments
raised by the'Board when it was last reviewed.
-2360-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
April 24~,2002
Skramstad asked what changes had been made to the budget.
~ Page12
McM'iian stated that there were some formula problems the last time the budget was reviewed by the Board.
There was some conoern that the $30,000 budgeted for contributions from the solicitation letters might be too
high; however, this figure remained the same.
MOTION: Skramstad moved, McMillan seconded to accept the 2002 Save the Lake Budget as submitted.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
McMillan stated that 2002 would be the third year that the committee has worked with the LMA on zebra
mussel testing on Lake Minnetonka, She indicated that she had a recent conversation with Dick Osgood
from the LMA on expanding this to tributary lakes that lead into Lake Minnetonka for 2002 and he has
proposed a number of lakes at an additional cost of $756 up and beyond the $500 budget approved for Lake
Minnetonka, She asked for feedback on the request from LMA.
The Board discussed a number of aspects relating to this request, including:
· There was concern expressed about the introduction of zebra mussels into these tributary lakes;
however, would it be appropriate to use "Save:the Lake" funds for lakes outside the jurisdiction of the
District. ~
· The LMA needs to discuss with other lake aSsociations the idea of them participating. in the zebra
mussel testing program and to encourage them to financially participate in the program.
°. The District could subsidize zebra mussel testing on these tributary lakes on a one.year basis to allow
the LMA to work with these tributary lake associations to buy into the program in the future.
MOTION:
Suerth moved, Skramstad seconded to approve up to $756 of Save the Lake funds for the 2002 ,~.
season, subject to the understanding that this is a one year funding commitment and that the LMA
needs to work with the tributary lake associations to have them fund this program in future years,
VOTE: Ayes (7), Nayes (1~ Nelson);.motion carried.
B. Additional Business.
McMilian stated that the spdng solicitation letter was being prepared and that it should be sent out in early
May. She encouraged Board members to forward possible names to enhance the, database of potent al
donors in the future.
Skramstad stated that there had been discussion at the 4/10/02 Board meeting on the continued funding of
the Water Patrol project beyond 2002, He advised that he would be meeting with'Gabriel Jabbour in the near
future on coordinating activities to see what is possible.
3, FINANCIAL
A. Audit of vouchers (4/16/02 - 4~30~02),
Skramstad reviewed the audit of vouchers for payment as submitted.
MOTION: Skramstad moved, McMillan seconded to approve the audit of vouchers for the periods of (4/16/02.
- 4130102) as submitted.
-2361 -
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
April 24, 2002
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
page 13
B. Additional Business.
Skramstad provided an update on the monthly financial summary and balance sheets that were reviewed at
the 4/10~02 Board meeting. He stated that some Board members expressed concem that the summary
sheet did not provide the details that they were looking for. He stated that he had e-mailed the spreadsheet
with the full details to Board members Nelson, McUillan, and Gilman. He received feedback imm Nelson
and was awaiting feedback from the other two Board members. Another option was that Steve McDonald
would communicate with the District bookkeeper on modifying the reports generated utiliZing peachtree
software to satisfy the needs of the Board.
EWMiEXOTICS TASK FORCE
A. 2002 EWM Harvesting season, staff overview of Project.
Foster stated that staff had prepared a detailed overview of the 2002 season. He asked the Board if they
had any qUeStions or comments.
?
Nybeck stated that he was seeking approval from the BOard to hire the seven full-time seasonal employees
for the EWM harvesting prOgram as outlined in the staff memo.
MOTION: Nelson moved, McMillan seconded to authorize staff to hire 2002 EWM Harvesting Program
emploYees at the houdy rates outlined in the staff memol
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
Update on "Let's Keep Zebra MuSSels OUt of Lake Minnetonka" PrOject.
SUerth stated, that staff had inCluded a letter from Lee Pfannmuller from the MN DNR regarding the District
and the LMA wb~:king With them on an inspection program 'at two public accesses this summer on Lake
Minnetonka on a pilot program basis. There still are a number of questions that need to be addressed and
that the Board should review the letter prior to the 5/8/02 Board meeting because it would be discussed.
Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
5. LAKE USE & RECREATION
w
There was no discussion.
ADMINISTRATION'
There was no discUssion.
7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Nybeck stated that three items were included in the packet for informational purposes. This included: -2362-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
April 24, 2002
page ~4
· A 4/16/02 letter from the Freshwater Society announcing the "Ice-Out" date on Lake Minnetonka at 2:46
a,m, on Tuesday, April 16~.
· A 4/16/02 Minneapolis Star Tdbune article that provided an update on the pending phosphorous-free
fertilizer legislation. ~
· A brochure announcing the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office lstAnnual Boat and Water Safety Seminar
on Wednesday, 5/2/02, at 6 p.m. at the Minnetonka Civic Center.
The consensus of the Board was to direct staff to prepare a resolution for review at a future Board meeting
commending the efforts of Shorewood Mayor Woody Love on the phosphorous-free fertilizer legislation.
8. OLD BUSINESS
LMCD Public Relations Update
Van Hercke provided an update on possible public relations alternatives for the District.. Atthe 4/10/02 meeting,
one alternative discussed by the Board was the concept of a District Newsletter. She believed that the
consensus of the Board was to look at alternatives that did not involve a District Newsletter because of the costs
involved, She reviewed three alternatives:
· She had received confirmation from the Lakeshore Weekly News regarding a quarterly LMCD column that
would be 500 words or less and would be included on page 4 in the commentary section. Phone calls
had been placed with the Minnetonka Sun Sailor to see if this column could be printed in that paper as
well. She stated that it would be possible to periodically submit a guest.column to be.included in the LMA
Newsletter. She reviewed a contact she had, Megan Diamond, who would be willing to assist in the
preparation of this column for around $350 per column.
· The City of Minnetonka would videotape and broadcast a District presentation thatwould inform and
educate the public, possibly through a power point presentation. A request has been made with Time
Warner's Leased Access Carriage.
· Public relations opportunities could be at appearances such as Minnetonka's Summer Festival, Burwell
House Ice Cream Social, James J, Hill Days, and Excelsior Art Fair.
If the Board decided to pdnt a District Newsletter, the City of Minnetonka has stated that they would include it
their new resident packet and make it available in their brochure racks atcity hall. She.recommended that the
Board authorize a quarterly LMCD new column and see how it goes, authoring up to $350 of funding to solicit
assistance.from Megan Diamond ·
The Board complimented the continued efforts of Van Hercke on this project.
MOTION: Skramstad moved, Nelson seconded to authorize up to $350 to work with Megan Diamond on the
LMCD Column to be published in the Lakeshore Weekly News~
VOTE:
Motion carded unanimously.
Howards Point Marina Pendinq Applications
Skramstad updated the Board on an upcoming project to convert an existing residential property to a commercial
property by allowing for additional dockage, There is a public headng scheduled at a 5/7/02 meeting in
Shorewood to discuss the rezoning request by Howards Point Marina and he understood that they have
submitted applications into the District for Board consideration as early as the 5/8/02 Regular meeting. He stated
that he would not be able to attend that meeting and that the Board might want to move the public heating back
two weeks if they would like him present at the public hearing.
-2363-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
April 24, 2002 page 15
The consensus of the Board was to direct staff to inform the applicant that the pending public hearing for the
District applications would be at the 5/22J02 Regular Meeting.
Upland Farms Update
Skramstad asked for an update on the Upland Farms project.
Knudsen stated that he believed that the discretionary EAW had been submitted to the MCWD and was currently
being reviewed.
9, NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
10. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:25 p.m.
Albert O.. Foster, Chairman
Lili McMillan, Secretary
-2364-
Page 1 of 1
Kandis M. Hanson
From:
Sent:
Subject:
"Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn.us>
VVednesday, April 24, 2002 11:24 AM
MWHS band tour experiences short delay
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCll
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
This message is being sent to subscribers to the Westonka Public
Schools' electronic newsletter, westonka.news.
The Mound Westonka High School Band Tour to New Orleans got a bumpy
start yesterday, April 23, due to a minor train accident that resulted
in a two-hour delay but no injuries to anyone on board.
According to band director Leigh Kallestad, before the train got to
Chicago, it hit a pickup truck at a railroad crossing. The train was not
derailed and there were no injuries to any passengers. We do not have
any information about the pickup truck or its occupant(s).
Police and medical personnel responded to the accident, and
representatives of various media covered the story at the scene. It is
our understanding that some Mound Westonka students may have been
interviewed by those reporters.
After a two-hour delay, the train resumed its route.
Mr. Kallestad will call with another tour update sometime today. If
there is any more news to share, we'll update you again via e-mail. The
students are expected to return on schedule on Sunday, April 28.
Barbara Olson
Community Relations Coordinator
Westonka Public Schools
2450 Wilshire Blvd, Suite A
Mound MN 55364
p: 952.491.8006
f: 952.491.8043
e-mail: olsonb@westonka.kl2.mn.us
We know your child by name...
We help your child achieve.
- 2 3 6 5 - 04/24/2002
Page 1 of 5
Kandis M. Hanson
From:
Sent:
Subject:
"Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn.us>
Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:57 PM
weston ka. news
westonka.news
Vol. 2, No. 28
April 26, 2002
The Westonka Public Schools' channel for direct electronic
communication to interested parents, staff, and community members,
providing up-to-date information about education in District 277.
westonka.news publishes weekly. Look for it in your mailbox on Fridays.
Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A, Mound MN
55364; http://wvvw.westonka.k12.mn.us; tel: 952.491.8006; fax:
952.491.8043; e-mail: welisten@westonka.k12, mn. us.
Contents
1. News Briefs
--Shirley Hills Celebrates 50th Birthday in May
--Haddorff Field Groundbreaking
--Lt. Gov. Mae Schunk to Visit Westonka on May 2
2. Focus Topic: Westonka State Test Passing Rates Climb Sharply
3. Upcoming Events
4. Tell Us What You Think
NEWS BRIEFS
**Shirley Hills Celebrates 50th Birthday in May**
You are warmly invited to help celebrate Shirley Hills Primary School's
50th birthday at a special birthday party on Wednesday, May 8, from 6:30
p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at Shirley Hills.
There will be coffee and cake, with lots of opportunities to reminisce
with old friends and meet some new ones, too.
- 2366- 04/29/2002
Page 2 of 5
All community members, current and former students and their families,
and current and former staff are invited.
**Haddorff Field Groundbreaking**
All Westonka community members are warmly invited to the groundbreaking
ceremony for the Haddorff Field Project, celebratingthe beginning of
construction of the Haddorff football-soccer field, two new practice
fields, and an Educational Service Center.
A highlight of the event will be the presence of several members of the
Haddorff family, plus representatives from school athletic programs and
community sports associations.
Monday, April 29, 6 p.m. (Program will last about 20 minutes)
Location: mid-field of new Haddorff Field, on east side of Mound
Westonka High School
In case of inclement weather, the event will be cancelled and not
rescheduled.
**Lt. Gov. Mae Schunk to Visit Westonka May 2**
Lt. Gov. Mae Schunk will visit the Westonka Public Schools on Thursday,
May 2, as part of her goal to tour every school district in Minnesota.
While she is here, she will meet with students involved in Mound
Westonka High School's Know America program, and hold a panel discussion
with a group of parents and staff.
If she arrives in time, she'll join the students and staff of Shirley
Hills Primary in an Ali-School photo-sure to be a reminder of her visit
for years to come!
FOCUS TOPIC
**Westonka State Test Passing Rates Climb Sharply**
The percentage of Westonka eighth-graders who earned passing scores on
the Minnesota Basic Skills Math Test climbed sharply this year,
according to test results released last week by the Minnesota Dept. of
Children, Families and Learning. Of Westonka eighth-graders taking the
test for the first time, 82% met state passing requirements in 2002,
compared to 72% in 2001.
- 2 3 6 7 - 04/29/2002
Page 3 of 5
Passing rates in reading continued to hold steady over the previous
year. Of Westonka eighth-graders taking the reading test for the first
time, 87% met state passing requirements in 2002, compared to 88% in
2001.
In both math and reading, Westonka eighth-graders equalled or outscored
their statewide counterparts on every element of the exams.
Students must earn passing scores on the eighth grade Basic Skills
Tests in order to be eligible to graduate from high school. Students who
do not earn a passing score the first time they take the test may retake
it in subsequent years.
Mound Westonka High School Principal Gene Zulk expressed pleasure with
the percentage of students that passed, but emphasized that he is
mindful of the students who did not do as well. '~/e want every child to
succeed and we'll continue to work hard to help them the next time
through," he said.
UPCOMING EVENTS
--April 26-27, GMS Spring Musical, 7:30 p.m.
--April 27, Shirley Hills Carnival, 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. Games, food,
auction--fun for the whole family!
--April 28, GMS Spring Musical, 3 p.m.
--April 29, Haddorff Field Groundbreaking, 6 p.m., Mound Westonka High
School
--April 29, School Board Study Session, 7 p.m., Mound Westonka High
School Little Theater
--April 30, Mound Westonka High School Academic/Expressive/Athletic
Awards Night, 7:30 p.m.
--May 1, District Retirement and Years-of-Service Recognition Banquet
--May
--May
--May
--May
2, Shirley Hills All-School Photo, 9:30 a.m.
2, Hilltop Author's Conference,Talent Showcase, 6:30 p.m.
2, Mound Westonka Band Concert, 8 p.m.
4, Sadie Hawkins Dance, Mound Westonka High School, 9 p.m.
Home
--April
--April
p.m.
--April
p.m.
--April
--April
--May
--May
Athletic Competitions:
29, Gr. 9 Softball vs. Wayzata, MWHS Field 6, 4:15 p.m.
29, Boys Varsity Golf vs. Columbia Heights, Burl Oaks, 3:30
30, Boys Varsity Tennis vs. Benilde, MWHS Tennis Courts, 4
30, Boys Varsity Golf vs. Orono, Burl Oaks, 3:15 p.m.
30, Girls Varsity Golf vs. Fridley, Burl Oaks, 3:45 p.m.
1, V and JV Baseball vs. Benilde, MVVHS Fields 1 & 10, 4:15 p.m.
1, Gr. 9, JV and V Softball vs. Benilde, MWHS Fields 9, 7 and 6,
- 2368- 04/29/2002
Page 4 of 5
4:15 p.m.
--May 2, Boys JV Tennis vs. Orono, MWI-IS Tennis Courts, 4.p.m.
--May 2, Boys Varsity Golf vs. St. Anthony, Burl Oaks, 4 p.m.
--May 2, Girls Varsity Golf vs. Benilde, Burl Oaks, 3:30 p.m.
FUNDAMENTAL FINANCE FACT
Here's an easy way to remember one aspect of school finance:
Levies are for Learning
(paying the operating costs of providing education, such as salaries,
utilities, and bus service)
An operating levy failed in November 2001.
Bonds are for Buildings
(keeping buildings in good repair and providing certain equipment, such
as computers)
A maintenance and technology bond referendum passed in March 2001.
State law prevents school districts from using bond money to pay for
operating expenses.
TELL US WHAT YOU THINK!
We would like to hear your feedback on any of the topics above, or any
other school-related issue. Use whichever way works best for you: send
an e-mail message to <welisten@westonka.k12.mn.us>; call the District
Feedback Line at 952.491.8260; or mail your comments to Barbara Olson,
Community Relations Coordinator, Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire
Blvd., Suite A, Mound MN 55364
To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to Barbara Olson
at <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn. us>
It is the mission of the Westonka Public School District, in
partnership with students, parents, and the community, to create the
environment necessary to achieve quality education for lifelong
learning.
Westonka Public Schools
2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A
Mound MN 55364
- 2369- 04/29/2002
Page 5 of 5
tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043
welisten@westonka.k12.mn.us
http://www.westonka.k12, mn.us
westonka.news is published by the Community Relations Department,
Barbara Olson, editor. The information contained in this broadcast is
given in good faith based on available information. The Westonka School
District accepts no legal responsibility for its accuracy. According to
the State of Minnesota, the subscriber list for this newsletter is
public data.
-2370- 04~9~002
Page 1 of 6
Kandis M. Hanson
From:
Sent:
Subject:
"Barbara Olson" <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn.us>
Friday, May 03, 2002 2:57 PM
westonka.news
westonka.news
Vol. 2, No. 29
May 3, 2002
The Westonka Public Schools' channel for direct electronic
communication to interested parents, staff, and community members,
providing up-to-date information about education in District 277.
westonka.news publishes weekly. Look for it in your mailbox on Fridays.
Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A, Mound MN
55364; http://www.westonka.k12.mn.us; tel: 952.491.8006; fax:
952.491.8043; e-mail: welisten@westonka.k12.mn.us.
Contents
1. News Briefs
--National Teacher Appreciation Week, May 5-11
--Bond Project Reporting, Know America Team Capture Lt. Gov.'s
Interest
--Shirley Hills Celebrates 50th Birthday Next Week
2. Focus Topic: Retirement and Years-of-Service Recognition
3. Upcoming Events
4. Tell Us What You Think
NEWS BRIEFS
**National Teacher Appreciation Week, May 5-11'*
May 5-11 is Teacher Appreciation Week.
We're proud of Westonka teachers! They are talented, dedicated,
generous, and well educated. Nearly 75% of Westonka's teaching staff
either hold or are pursuing advanced degrees. They regularly earn honors
-2371 - 05/03/2002
Page 2 of 6
from their peers, including Mary Gorder being named Minnesota Music
Educator of the Year in 2000, and Gene Zulk being named Principal of the
Year in 2001, representing more than 250 high schools in Hennepin and
Carver Counties. And they serve as teachers, counselors, friends,
shoulders to cry on, and cheerleaders who believe in every child who
walks through their classroom door.
A banner found in classrooms throughout the country reads, "Teaching is
the most important profession because through the hands of teachers pass
all professions."
Consider sending a message of appreciation to a teacher who has made a
difference in your child's life. If you choose to send it by e-mail,
note that e-mail protocol for Westonka staff is generally
<LastNameFirstl nitial@westonka.k12, mn. us>
**Bond Project Reporting, Know America Team Capture Lt. Gov's
Interest**
Lt. Gov. Mae Schunk visited Westonka on Thursday, as part of her plan
to visit every school district in Minnesota during her current term in
office. She left with a greater understanding of and appreciation for
two areas, in particular: our community's strong support for
co-curricular opportunities such as Know America; and the accountability
demonstrated by the school district by reporting on bond project
progress.
Lt. Gov. Schunk started her day here by joining Shirley Hills students
and staff in an all-school photo. Two Grandview Middle School
seventh-graders, Anna Lee and Maleah Homola, then partnered with Supt.
Pam Myers to share a PowerPoint presentation showcasing the school
district that they had created in technology class.
The Lieutenant Governor then participated in a conversation with Mound
Westonka's Know America team, facilitated by teacher/advisor Marc
Doepner-Hove. Two aspects make Mound Westonka's Know America program the
only one of its kind in the state: instead of being a tour anyone can
pay to join, students must earn the trip to Washington DC by posting
high scores on four tests covering government, history, and geography;
and the program has unusually high community support, with local
organizations providing the majority of the funding for it. According to
the students, the trip offers experiences that simply can't be
replicated in the classroom. Lt. Gov. Schunk was so impressed by the
program that she asked for permission to share it with others when she
presents at a national conference for state education commissioners
later this summer.
A panel of parents, students, staff, and community members then joined
the Lieutenant Governor for a discussion on educational issues in
Westonka. Discussion centered on two major issues:
- 2372- 05/03/2002
Page 3 of 6
i) inequity of funding among school districts, with Westonka being
prohibited by law from collecting as much money per student as
neighboring districts are able to collect;
2) efforts to demonstrate accountability to government leaders when the
definition of "accountability" varies from leader to leader.
As Lt. Gov. Schunk toured Shirley Hills, though, a hallway poster that
showed progress on projects funded through the Spring 2001 bond
referendum caught her eye. As she directed her assistant to take a photo
of it, she noted that this is something all school districts should do
to demonstrate accountability to taxpayers. Supt. Myers added that all
the bond project information is also located on the school district's
web site for anyone to check 24 hours a day.
**Shirley Hills Celebrates 50th Birthday in May**
You are warmly invited to help celebrate Shirley Hills Primary School's
50th birthday at a special birthday party on Wednesday, May 8, from 6:30
p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at Shirley Hills.
There will be coffee and cake, with lots of opportunities to reminisce
with old friends and meet some new ones, too. All community members,
current and former students and their families, and current and former
staff are invited.
FOCUS TOPIC
**Retirement and Years-of-Service Recognition**
The 2002 Retirement and Years-of-Service Employee Recognition Banquet,
held earlier this week, honored eleven retiring employees, one retiring
school board member, and 15 others who have reached years-of-service
milestones with the school district.
Corporate sponsorships fully subsidized the event, except for the
individual meal tickets purchased by attendees. This is the second year
in a row that the banquet has been made possible through donations from
corporate partners. Sponsors included: Ehlers and Associates; Gallagher
& Associates, Inc.; Loftier; Metro Athletic Supply; Pederson Associates,
Inc.; and TSP One, Inc. A raffle prize was also provided by Diversified
Snack Distribution.
Retirees honored at this year's banquet included: Ron Dressel, Jane
Eckers, Dennis Eckman, Pat Furlong, Judy Good, Theresa Holm, Margaret
Holste, Royal Johnson, Claudette Nelson, Pat Rousseau, and Dave
Sorsoleil. Former school board chair Bill Pinegar was also honored for
his service on the school board.
-2373- 05/03/2002
Page 4 of 6
Employees recognized for years of service included:
15 years:
Humbert,
20 years:
Schultz
25 years:
30 years:
35 years:
Melanie Allen, Brenda Berent, Debra Holzerland, Chris
Mike Lamprecht, Kate Nygaard, and Judy Roy.
Susan Bigalke, Linda Cordie, Dr. Pam Myers, and Jeannine
Mary Gentes, Danny Welch
Yolanda Clark
Pat Rousseau
UPCOMING EVENTS
--May 5-11, National Teacher Appreciation Week; May 7 is Teacher
Appreciation Day
--May 6, Gr. 7 Choir Concert, 7 p.m., Grandview Middle School
HT PTA Staff Appreciation Luncheon
Gr. 8 and 9 Choir Concert, 7:30 p.m., Mound Westonka High
--May 7,
--May 7,
School
--May 8,
School
--May 9,
GMS Beginning Band Information Night, 7 p.m., Grandview Middle
Gr. 6 Band Concert, 7 p.m., Grandview Middle School
--May 9, Concert Choir, Women's Choir Concert, 7:30 p.m., Mound
Westonka High School
--May 10, SH PTA Staff Appreciation Breakfast, 7:30 a.m.
--May 11, MW Prom, 9 p.m. to midnight, Gillespie Center
--May 13, Superintendent's Roundtable, 5-6 p.m., Room 200, Shirley
Hills Primary School. The Superintendent's Roundtable is an informal
opportunity to chat with Supt. Pam Myers, to ask questions and learn
more about the school district.
--May 13, School Board regular meeting, 7:30 p.m. (The Share the
Success portion of the meeting starts at 7 p.m.) Shirley Hills Primary
School
--May 13, Gr. 6 Choir Concert, 7 p.m., Grandview Middle School
Home Athletic Competitions:
--May 7, Gr. 9 Baseball vs. Brooklyn Center, MWHS Field 1, 4:15 p.m.
--May 8, Boys Tennis vs. Breck, MWHS Tennis Courts, 4 p.m.
--May 8, Gr. 9 Baseball vs. Orono, MVVHS Field 1, 4:15 p.m.
--May 8, Gr. 9, JV and V Softball vs. Columbia Heights, MWHS Fields 7,
9 and 6, 4:15 p.m.
--May 9, Girls Varsity Golf vs. Orono, Burl Oaks, 3:30 p.m.
--May 10, Varsity Baseball vs. Columbia Heights, MWHS Field 1, 4:15
p.m.
--May 10, JV and V Softball vs. St. Anthony, MWHS Fields 9 and 6, 4:15
p.m.
- 2374- 05/03/2002
Page 5 of 6
FUNDAMENTAL FINANCE FACT
Here's an easy way to remember one aspect of school finance:
Levies are for Learning
(paying the operating costs of providing education, such as salaries,
utilities, and bus service)
An operating levy failed in November 2001.
Bonds are for Buildings
(keeping buildings in good repair and providing certain equipment, such
as computers)
A maintenance and technology bond referendum passed in March 2001.
State law prevents school districts from using bond money to pay for
operating expenses.
TELL US WHAT YOU THINK!
We would like to hear your feedback on any of the topics above, or any
other school-related issue. Use whichever way works best for you: send
an e-mail message to <welisten@westonka.k12.mn.us>; call the District
Feedback Line at 952.491.8260; or mail your comments to Barbara Olson,
Community Relations Coordinator, Westonka Public Schools, 2450 Wilshire
Blvd., Suite A, Mound MN 55364
To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to Barbara Olson
at <olsonb@westonka.k12.mn.us>
It is the mission of the Westonka Public School District, in
partnership with students, parents, and the community, to create the
environment necessary to achieve quality education for lifelong
learning.
Westonka Public Schools
2450 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite A
Mound MN 55364
tel: 952.491.8006; fax: 952.491.8043
welisten @weston ka. k 12. mn. us
http://www.westonka, k12. mn. us
westonka.news is published by the Community Relations Department,
Barbara Olson, editor. The information contained in this broadcast is
- 2375- 05/03/2002
Page 6 of 6
given in good faith based on available information. The Westonka School
District accepts no legal responsibility for its accuracy. According to
the State of Minnesota, the subscriber list for this newsletter is
public data.
- 2376- 05/03/2002
h A
R T E R e D
470 Pillsbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis MN 55402
(612) 337-9300 telephone
(612) 337-9310 fax
hr tp://www, kennedy-graven.com
May 2, 2002
ROBERT J. LINDALL
Attomey at Law
Direct Dial (612) 337-9219
*Certified Real Property Law Specialist
Jim Grebe
Director of Transportation
Transportation Department
County. of Hennepin
1600 Prairie Drive
Medina, MN 55340-5421
Re:
Realignment of Hennepin County State Aid Road 15 (Shoreline Drive)
Improvement of Hennepin County State Aid Road 110 (Commerce Boulevard)
County Project No. 9417 - Hennepin County/City of Mound Right of Way Agreement
Dear Jim:
This is to confirm our discussions with you, Kandis Hanson, Mound City Manager and John Cameron,
Mound City Engineer, on April 16, 2002. At that time, it was my understanding that we were all in
agreement with the following:
The grade of the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority Line at Hennepin County Road 110
(Commerce Boulevard) in the City of Mound should remain fixed as part of the proposed plan
of Hennepin County and the City of Mound to realign Hennepin County Road 15 (CSAH 15).
You will direct your design staff to attempt to resolve elevation changes which, in the future,
may be requ!red on the rail line east of the new CSAH 15 crossing of the rail line (at Belmont
Lane) so as to minimize or avoid the risk of later being required to reconstruct the crossing
(either up or down) and to avoid designing the CSAH 15 crossing to a high elevation which is
justified only as being necessary to preserve the ability to continue using the railroad line for
freight or light rail train service at some future time.
o
You will direct Harlan Hanson of your staff to resume working on the proposed Hennepin
County/City of Mound right-of-way agreement so that it is possible for the City and County to
concurrently process: (1) the proposed City/County right-of-way agreement; and (2) the
proposed County/City and HCRRA agreement. We hope these can be completed as soon as
possible to the satisfaction of the City.
The proposed County/City/HCRRA agreement would presumably address the following:
The right of the City and/or County to purchase excess right-of-way owned by HCRRA
(lying beyond a distance of 50 feet from the center line of the existing HCRRA track);
RJL-213988vl
MU200-92
*Certified by Minnesota State Bar Association
-2377-
Jim Grube Ltr
May 2, 2002
Page 2
The ability of the City and County and other affected utility owners to obtain easements
from HCRRA permitting relocation of utility facilities within the above-described 100-
foot HCRRA right-of-way, subject to a duty of the easement holder to move the utilities
located within the 100-£oot right-of-way pursuant to such easements in the event
necessary to do so at some future date to accommodate HCRRA use of the 100-foot
right-of-way.
Agreement on the elevation of new CSAH 15 at the new crossing over the railroad and
the new elevation of the railroad east and west of the crossing if necessary to determine
the new elevation at the crossing.
It may be necessary to phase the new CSAH 15 reconstruction project. One possible phasing
arrangement would provide as follows:
Phase I - Everything west of the west touchdown of the new CSAH 15 crossing of the railroad,
to be constructed in early 2003. (Query: Couldn't Phase I also include everything east of the
east touchdown as well?)
Phase II - Everything east of Phase I, to be constructed in late 2003. (Query: If Phase I can
include everything east of the east touchdown, then Phase II would be only the area between the
west touchdown and the east touchdown.)
It was recognized that HCRRA means to keep the ability to resume railroad operations until December
28, 2003, but that it can then consider approving a design which no longer permits freight use of the
railroad track and can then address other objectives such as an optimum interim design which preserves
the possibility of LRT or commuter rail operations.
We look forward to meeting with you and/or your staff at the earliest possible opportunity to resume
progress towards Hermepin County Board of Commissioner approval of both the right-of-way
agreement and the HCRRA agreement.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Very truly y~
~ll
RJL:peb
cc: Kandis Hanson
John Cameron
Bruce Chamberlain
John Dean
RJL-213988v 1
MU200-92
-2378-
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Telephone 472-0621
Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
Memo
To". Kandis Hanson, City Manger
Frmn'-Chief Len Harrell
Date: 4/25/02
R~ School Resource Officei:(SRO) Grant
Attached you will find a number ~
at Grandview Middle School that also
Primary.
the SRO position
, of the Lake and Shirley Hills
The odginal discussion began in the Spring of 2000; In my yearly presentation to the council
I believe I first presented the idea cases ~nvolving school shootings.
In the Fall of 2000, up to offer a
substantial contribution Police Department.
Money was needed for implementation :of'.the p~m in the FalI of 2001 at the start of the
school year and any gra~it aWa~ii!;~uld no~ co~ until after JanUary 1, 2002. Other
approximately $24,
Because of September
awards. We had confide~:~,e~d be a
up to our!
program for the first
awarded on Mamh 20,
the year
The grant is a three'
federal auditing office
~ffice~has::.~nSloW in making the grant
Jr past racord of Ihting
to continue the
our grant has b~n
back to the first of
for the award from the
over a three year
period. The award that the position
COntinue to by funded by the City after the three year grant period. The grant is designed to
allow City's to gradually add to their existing personnel over the three years to implement the
program.
Should you need a copy of the grant; Michelle Alexander has a copy.
· Page I
-2379-..
olOt
Mound Police Department to Implement School Resource
Officer Program
The Mound Police Department is taking another quantum leap into
community-oriented policing and crime prevention by implementing the
School Resource Officer Program [SRO] at the Grandview Middle School.
Many police agencies have formed partnerships with school systems to
create the SRO program which is considered one of the most proactive
strategies in community-oriented policing. The Mound Police Department
recently received the prestigious International Association of Chiefs of
Police/ITT Industries Community Policing award for the year 2000.
Targeting an inception date of Fall 2001, the program requires an initial
funding goal of $48,000. The Mound office of Wells Fargo Bank has
generously donated $12,500 to kick off the fundraising efforts of the SRO
program at the Grandview Middle School. The balance of the fundraising
efforts needs to be completed by the Spring of 2001 giving ample time to
hire and train the School Resource Officer for the coming school year.
Community support of programs like the SRO is needed in order to
facilitate its initial implementation.
The School Resource Officer Program places a law-enforcement officer on
a school campus, making it the officer's assigned patrol area. By applying
a community oriented policing philosophy within the school, the School
Resource Officer is able to assist the school administration in providing the
most secure and orderly environment possible.
The SRO is a specially trained, state-certified law enforcement officer who
is assigned full time during the academic school year. The SRO Program is
based on a cooperative relationship between law enforcement officers,
teachers, school personnel and parents. It develops a positive relationship
between the SRO and students.
The SRO fulfills several important roles. First, as a law enforcement
officer, the law will be consistently and fairly enforced. The SRO will take
the necessary enforcement actions, when necessary, to ensure a safe and
peaceful learning environment. Second, the SRO serves as an instructor,
teaching classes that are many times related to core subjects, such as
D.A.R.E and the Corrective Behavior Curriculum. Finally, the SRO is a
-2380-
counselor, being permanently assigned to the school campus the SRO is
readilY available- to assist-students~ and'Staff members with. personal and
school related problems when appropriate.
The School Resource Officer is involved with various school activities.
The officer is seen as a part of the campus environment. The presence of a
law enforcement officer on campus provides opportunities for positive
experiences between the law. enforcement officer and the students. These
experiences can lead to greater mutual understanding and 'respect,
potentially resulting in the prevention of de.linquency and crime. Principal
Kevin Borg of the Grandview Middle School, educating 525 students in
grades 5-7, is very supportive of this program for the school district.
The Mound Crime Prevention Association, a 501(c)(3) non-profit
organization, is seeking contributions from the Mound community to fund
this program for the. 2001 school year. Contact Jim Brand at 472-2000 for
more information.
-2381 -
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: POLICE PERSONNEL
FROM: LEN HARRFJ,T.
SUBJECT: SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER
DATE: 5/z6/o1
AS MOST OF YOU ARE AWARE, WE HAVE RECEIVED FUNDING TO BEGIN A
FULL-TIME PERSON IN THE MIDDLE SCHOOL FOR THE SCHOOL YEAR
BEGINNING IN SEPTEMBER. THE POSITION W~'IJ. BE PRIMARILY AT THE
MIDDLE SCHOOL, BUT WILL ALSO WORK CLOSELY WITH SHIRLEY HILLS,
OUR LADY, AND THE HIGH SCHOOL. FUNDING HAS BEF~N DONATED TO
COVER THE F. AI J. AND ADDITIONAL FUNDING HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR TO
PAY FOR THE POSITION INTO THE FUTURE.
THE POSITION WILL .ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEVELOPING AFTER
SCHOOL PROGRAMS AS NEEDS ARE IDENTIFIED AS WELL AS SUMMER
PROGRAMS FOR KIDS IN OUR COlVllvlUNI~. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THE
POSITION WIIJ. BE SCHEDULED MONDAY-FRIDAY DURING THE SCHOOL
YEAR DURING THE DAY, BUT MAY VARY SOMEWHAT IN THE SUMMER AS
NEF, DS DEMAND.
OFFICERS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE POSITION ARE TO SUBMIT A
LETTER OF INTENT OUTLINING THEIR QUALIFICATIONS AS WRI.L AS A
RESUME NO LATER THAN JUNE 1s.r, 2001. DEPENDING ON THE NUMBER OF
INTERESTED PARTIES, A SF, I.RCTION PROCESS WILI, TAKE PLACE.
-2382-
September 27, 2001
Ms. Leah Weycker
Westonka Family Collaborative
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Leah:
Thank you and the Collaborative for agreeing to the generous donation of seven thousand
dollars ($7,000.00) for the fall implementation of the school resource officer at
Grandview Middle School. Officer Miehelle Alexander has been assigned to the schools
since late August and has been very active assisting students within the Mound/Westonka
School District. Your support and partnership are greatly appreciated in this endeavor.
Please make the cheek out to the Mound Crime Prevention Association who will handle
the funding of the new initiative. Thank you!
Sincerely,
Len Harrell
Chief of Police
-2383-
October 18, 2000
Ms. Bonita Medenwaldt
Wells Fargo Bank
5211 Shoreline Drive
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ms. Medenwaldt:
The Mound Police Department is an agency within the government entity of the City of
Mound. The City is represented by Mayor Patricia Meisel and four council members;
Mark Hanus, Andrea Ahems, Leah Weycker, and Bob Brown. The City of Mound's tax
exempt number is 802-4096. The Mound Police Department is an agency of thirteen
sworn officers, three support personnel, and seven volunteers. The Department provides
public safety and community policing services to a population of approximately 9,812
citizens. The City is a bedroom community on the west shores of Lake Minnetonka. The
Mound Police Department is the recipient of the International Association of Chiefs of
Police/ITT Industries Community Policing Award for the year 2000.
The position for which we are requesting your assistance involves the implementation of
a School Resource Officer (SRO) for the Grandview Middle School. The School
Resource Officer (SRO) is assigned to work within the school environment and provide
support and security to our young people. Grandview Middle School supports
approximately 525 students in grades 5-7. The School Resource Officer (SRO) would
be in addition to our fiffia grade D.A.R.E. program and our Corrective Behavior
Curriculum.
The Bureau of Justice Assistance in their Guide for Preventing and Responding to School
Violence recommends departments "patrol school grounds and develop a School
Resource Officer (SRO) program" (p. 25, 1999). The Mound Police Department has
worked in close partnership with the Grandview Middle School and believes that a
School Resource Officer (SRO) program would benefit the educational environment. A
recent report from Hennepin County indicates that approximately 37% of our "school
crime" was committed by children thirteen and younger. A national publication, Juvenile
Offenders and Victims:1999 National Report by the Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention, reported that 13 and 14 year olds accounted for 27% of juvenile
crime nationally and children 12 and under accounted for 10% of juvenile crime (p. 146).
-2384-
The Grandview Middle School serves children ages 11-14 and would be our focus for the
School Resource Officer (SRO) program. The School Resource Officer (SRO) program
would allow for the expansion of our direct services to the youth of our community.
Per our conversation, your assistance in implementation, would provide up to $25,000.00
towards the cost of implementation of $48,000. The additional funds would be provided
through our own budgeting process within the City of Mound. The program would be
scheduled to begin fall of 2001 for the school year of 2001-2002 giving ample time to
hire and train the appropriate individual to work with our middle school children.
Experience has shown that assistance in implementation is often the boost the department
needs in order to facilitate new programs for the community,
I hope that I have answered your questions appropriately. If I can be of further
assistance, do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for interest and assistance.
Sincerely,
Len Harrell
Chief of Police
-2385-
CITY OF
SHOREWOOD
5755 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD · SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331-8927 · (952) 474-3236
FAX (952) 474-0128 · www. ci.shorewood.mn.us · cityhall @ci.shorewood.mn.us
· April 30, 2002
Mayor Pat Meisel
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364-1627
Dear Mayor Meisel:
We have achieved a major, overwhelming victory at the Legislature. A new bill was been signed into
law on April 19 that will restrict the use of lawn fertilizers containing phosphorus throughout the
state. Minnesota is the first state in the nation to take such an action to further improve the quality of
our waters and thus reduce the public costs to treat the effects of phosphorus pollution.
Your support and that of over 50 cities, other local governments and associations, largely through
governing board resolutions and contacts with legislators at key moments, were critical to the passage
of this legislation. I would like especially to acknowledge the financial support given to Shorewood
by the cities of Cottage Grove, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Falcon Heights, Plymouth, and Stillwater.
While we sought State regulation of the sale ofthese fertilizers, this broad of a scope proved
unpassable. By restricting the use of such fertilizers, however, we believe that manufacturers and
retailers will not want to cause or abet illegal activity by their customers; hence, they will need to
make low-.and no-phOsphorus fertilizers readily available to consumers.
The key provisions in the legislation, nearly all of which will take effect January 1, 2004:
· Maximum of 0% phosphorus content in the seven-county Metro area, and 3% phosphorus
content in the rest of Minnesota, will be allowed to be used. (Reasonable exceptions, of
coUrse: establishment of new turf, or soil test results showing a deficiency of phosphorus.)
· Non-metro local units of government may adopt ordinances to go to 0% phosphorus, provided
that they subsequently notify the Department of Agriculture.
· Local ordinances more restrictive than the new law are grandfathered if they were effective
prior to August 1, 2002. (The League of Mirmesota Cities and Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities are developing sample/model ordinances for cities that may want to have
restrictions on the sale of fertilizers with phosphorus.)
· Golf courses and commercial applicators are exempted, provided they have State license,
training, or certification.
· The Department of Agriculture, with consultation from other interested organizations, will
develop point-of-sale information.
OPRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
-2386-
Lawn Fertilizer Legislation
April 3O, 2002
Page'Two
· The Department of Agriculture, with involvement of the University of Minnesota extension
service and other interested or affected parties, will evaluate effectiveness of the law and
report to the Legislature by January 15, 2007.
· ' The scope of the legislation is turf fertilizers. Cities may not regulate fertilizers containing
phosphorus for agricultural uses or application.
Being involved in theprocess of passing a piece of legislation is interesting, to say the least. This
proposal certainly had its ups and downs. Despite the overwhelming support (55 - 3 in the Senate,
116 - 16 in the House, on each body's first reading), there were several times that the bill might be
held up to miss committee deadlines, and several times that the nose-counting did not appear in our
favor. There were many long or sleepless nights. Ultimately, hard work at finding common ground
as well as good old common sense prevailed.
This law was the result of the involvement of many people mad organizations. I am greatly
appreciative and personally humbled by the support shown by so many. Shorewood is proud to be a
member of the broad coalition backing and pushing this bill. Thank you again for being a part of this
unprecedented legislation.
Sincerel , '
Woody'Love
Mayor
~/c: City Manager/Administrator
-2387-
-2388-
-2389-
Table DP*I. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000
Geographic Area: Moun'~l citY, Minnesota
[For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see text]
Subject Number Pement Subject Number Percent
Total population .......... :~ ............... 9,435 100.0 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE
Total population .......................... 9,435 100.0
SEX AND AGE Hispanic or. Latino (of any race) ................ 91 1.0
Male ........................................ 4,906 52.0 Mexican ................................... 49 0.5
Female ............................. 4,529 48.0 Puerto RIcan ............................... 10 0.1
Under 5 years ............................... 558 5.9 Cuban ....................................
5 to 9 years ................. ~ ............... 639 6.8 Other Hispanic or Latino .................... 32 0.3
10 to 14 years ................ :? ................ 665 7.0 Not Hispanic or Latino ........................ 9,344 99.0
15 to 19 years ............................... 584 6.2 White alone ................................ 9,033 95.7
20 to 24 years ............................... 389 4.1 RELATIONSHIP
25 to 34 years ............................... 1,416 15.0 Total population .......................... 9,435 100.0
35 to 44 years ............... * ............... 1,947 20.6 In households ................................ 9,434 100.0
45 to 54 years ............................... 1,547 16.4 Householder ............................... 3,982 42.2
55 to 59 years ............... ~ ............... 513 5.4. Spouse ................................... 2,129 22.6
60 to 64 years ............... : ............... 332 3.5 Child ...................................... 2,618 27.7
55 to 74 years ............... ; ......... 477 5:1 Own child under 18 years ................ 2,139 22.7
75 to 84 years ............... ................ 297 3.1 Other relatives ............................. 192 2.0
85 years and over ........... ;'. ............... 71 0.8 Under 18 years ......................... 70 0.7
Median age (years) ..... ~ ..... ; ............... 37~5 (X) Nonrelatives ............................... 513 5.4
Unmarried partner ....................... 2461 2,6
18 years and over ...... i .... i~ ............... 7,183 76.1 In group quarters ............................. 1
Male ...................................... 3,711 39.3 Institutionalized population ...................
Female .................... ~ ............... 3,472 36.8 Noninstitutionalized population ............... 1
2~ years and over ............ ... ..... 6,927 73.4
62 years and over ......... '...+~. .............. 1,000 10.6 HOUSEHOLD BY TYPE
65 years and over ........... ;~. .............. 845 9.0 Total h0ueeholda ......................... 3 982 100.0
Male ................. ~; .... 353 3.7 Family hOUSeholds (familieS) ................... 2,559 64.3
Female ................... i'~. .............. 492 5.2: With own children under 18 years .......... 1,203 30.2
Married-couple family ....................... 2,129 53.5
RACE . With own children under 18 years .......... 923 23.2
One race ................... ~ ~. .............. 9,327 98.9 Female householder no husband present ..... 294 7.4
White ..................... .i!. ,. ............. 9,080 96.2 With own children Under 18 years .......... 196 4.9
Black or African American.. ,~;. ...... 60 0.6 Nonfamlly households . ~ ...................... 1,423 35.7
American Indian and Alaska ~ative ........... 18 0.2 HouSeholder living alone .................... 1,128 28.3
Asian .................... ;:i. ........ 123 1.3 Householder 65 years and over ............ 279 7.0
Asian Indian ............. : ............... 8 0.1
Ch nese ........ ~ ............. 17 0.2 HoUseholds with individuals under 18 years ..... 1,264 31.7
Filipino .................. ............... 7 0.1 Households with individUals 65 years and over .. 627 15.7
Japanese ................ .. .............. 8 0,1 Average household size ....................... 2.37 (X)
Korean .................. ~ .......... 30 0.3 Average family size ..... 2.93 (X)
Vietnamese .............................. 2 ......................
OtherAsian ~ ' 51 0.5 HOUSING OCCUPANCy
Native Hawaiian and Other pacific Islander .... 4 Total housing units ....................... 4,118 100.0
Native Hawaiian .......................... I Occupied housing units ....................... 3,982 96.7
Guamanian or Chamorro .................. 1 Vacant housing units .......................... 136 3.3
Samoan ................. ~. .............. 1 For seasonal, recreational, or
Other Pacific Islander 2 1 occasional use ............................ 67 1.6
Some other race ........... ? .............. 42 0.4
Two or more races ........... ; ............... 108 1.1 Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) ............. 0.8 (X)
: Rental vacancy rate (percent) .................. 1.8 (X)
Race alone or in comblnation with one
or more other races: · HOUSING TENURE
White ...................... ~i. .............. 9,172 g7.2 Occupied housing units .................. 3,982 100.0
Black or African American ..... . ................ 92 1.0 Owner-occupied housing units ................. 3,208 80.6
American Indian and Alaska Native ............. 47 0.5 Renter-occupied housing units .................. 774 19.4
Asian ...................... ~:~. .............. 168 1.8
Native Hawaiian and Other Parc Islander ......
7 0.1 Average household size of owner-occupied units. 2.49 (X)
Some other race ............ ~ ............... 58 0.6 Average household size of renter-occupied units. 1.87 (X)
- Represents zero or rounds:ih zero. (X) Not applicable.
~ Other Asian alone, or tw~ &~i more Asian categories.
2 Other Pacific Islander albne, or two or more Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander categories.
a In combination with one or .r~ore of the other races listed. The six numbers may add to more than the total population and the six percentages
may add to more than 100 perc&nt because individuals may report more than one race.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau;:'Census 2000.
2427
Census Bureau
-2390-
· Gillespie Gazet
VOL X NO 5
May - 2002
PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE
April 24, 2002
Dear Members and Friends,
It's true, spring is really here. The ice is out of the lake, the golf courses are open and flowers and
trees are starting to bud. Almost all of our snow birds have returned. Our Secretary, Barb Calhoun, has
been extra busy with the projects this spring and won't be returning for a while. Carol Jean Lindgren has
stepped forward and done a great job taking Minutes of meetings. This is in addition to her other
volunteering at our Center. Thanks, Carol Jean for all your volunteer help.
The month of March was designated as the month to help the food shelves. We collected food and
money to help our local food shelf, Westonka Food Shelf. Mary DeVinney, one of our members, is the
manager of this food shelf and has been the manager for many years. This would be a full time job for most
of us. This has been a labor of love for Mary and our community can be proud of the wonderful work of this
nice lady does. We are proud that Mary is a member of our Center.
On Saturday, April 13~, the Mound Westonka National Honor Society hosted a breakfast to honor
all of our senior volunteers. Muriel Gyllen, Virginia Keefe, Margaret Mattson and Marge Stutsman are our
special volunteers for 2001. We appreciate all the help you give to our Center. Thanks to all of our
volunteers and thanks to the National Honor Society for this special treat for our senior volunteers.
One of the special volunteer opportunities, in my opinion, is our Pen Pal program. I have been a Pen
Pal for three years and I find this to be a truly rewarding experience. We met our Pen Pals at Shirley Hills
School earlier this spring. Our Pen Pals were here at our Center on April 23r~ for lunch and fellowship. These
youngsters are really special. Thanks to Dotty O'Brien for coordinating this wonderful program.
Many of you know that the Board of the Westonka Senior Citizens Foundation oversees the running
of our Gillespie Center. This is certainly a much larger job than managing the daily task most of us
homeowners have. Many of you know most of these people, but I would like you to know all of them.
Foundation officers are: Sharon Cook, President, Patty Guttormson, Vice President, Dotty O'Brien,
Secretary, and Roger Westman, Treasurer. Board Members are: Pat Meisel, Meisel Hardware Specialties,
Theresa Pesch, Ridgeview Medical Center, Marion Poteete, Doris LeGault, Jerry Kohls, Pond Hockey Arena,
Chad Vitzthun, Marquette (Wells Fargo) Bank, Gene Partyka, Jerry Henke, Roger Reed, Reed and Pond, Len
Harrel, Mound Police Department, Cheryl Fischer, City of Minnetrista, Jack Weist and Helen Sweezo. You will
notice that most of these Foundation Board Members are also members of the Gillespie Center. Thanks to
all these Foundation Board members for all they do for our Center.
~tack Weist Chairperson
Gillespie Center Advisory Council
-2391 -
Mediaco
April 29, 2002
City of Mound
City Mgr Kandis Hanson
5341 Maywood Rd
Mound, MN 55364-1627
Bill Jensen
Regional Manager
Re: Mediacom Onlinesm Price Change
Effective June 1, 2002
Dear Municipal Official:
In our efforts to provide important and timely information, please be advised of an upcoming price
change that will affect Mediacom Online~m high speed Internet service customers in your area.
The new rate structure decreases the modem rental to $5.00 and increases the monthly service rate by
a maximum of $6.00. Customers who do not rent a modem from Mediacom will see an increase of
$5.00 in their bill as a result of this redistribution of the modem rental charge. Current HSD customers
who have purchased their own modem will have a $5.00 discount applied to their account for the next
12 months. A separate postcard has been created and will be mailed specifically for these customers
explaining the $5.00 discount.
Effective with the June 2002 billing statements, the full retail monthly rates for Mediacom Online
service are as follows:
eMediacom Online~ with Video Service ( no modem rental)
*Mediacom Online~ with Video Servi-ee with modem rental
*Mediacom Online~ without Video Service ( no modem rental)
*Mediaeom Online=, without Video Service with modem rental
$40.95
$45.95
$50.95
$55.95
Notice to customers is being provided via direct mail. We are also sending a supplemental e-mail
message directly to current Mediaeom Online~ customers.
If you have any questions about these changes, pleases contact me at 507-835-2356, extension 222.
Enclosures- 4
Mediacom Communications Corporation
1504 2nd Street, S.E. * Waseca, MN 56093 · 507-835-2356 · Fax 507-835-4567
-2392-
CZ.,
_<..
~0 U1 U-I n 0
~-2393-
Medi~
PR~KTE~
R3ST,~GE
PAD
P ERJ"I ITarS 23
~ I~ B~H
RC~ PJI~
FA S TT.AC
· ~o~.~ INTE'RN~ET
1987-D04 North Central / Other
-2394-
m
-2395
Media~~
THE
FA $ TTRAC K
~o ~.[ INTERN ET
1987-C04 North Central / OUler
-2396
Mary Opheim
2885 Westedge Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364-9481
-2397-
fohn M. Evans
2025 Arbor Lane
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 495-1620
April 22, 2002
Laker/Pioneer
2365 Commerce Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Editor:
On April 13, 2002 1 had the pleasure of attending a meeting at the Gilespie Center sponsored by
the Westonka Historical Society at which F. Todd Warner, Candice Hanson and Sarah Smith
spoke eloquently regarding the really exciting upgrades presently in the works for downtown
Mound. These folks are real movers and shakers and tremendous assets to the community.
One of the many great ideas mentioned is the proposed pier. or wharf which is to be built near the
railway station and beach area that will be able to accommodate the Minnehaha and other large
cruise vessels further enhancing our image as a port city.
This image is likely to be even more distinct with the completion of the Lost Lake Canal (I call it
the Inner Harbor Project). Mound already has more shoreline than any other town on the lake and
should be proud of its marine tradition.
Incidentally, if the Westonka Historical Society together with the city can collect just $3.00 per
man, woman and child, there is an excellent chance that the new pier actually be completed this
summer (Yes, I've made my donation!). Over $500.00 was pledged during this meeting.
Just one last thought. What do you think of a possible name change to reflect our lake orientation
- - - just consider names like, Tonka Bay, Minnetonka Beach, Deephaven, Shorewood.
Personally the name Westonka would have my vote (I didn't intend to slight our neighbors in
Minnetrista, Spring Park and Long Lake. Those names are beautiful too.) The name Westonka
seems to have a certain magic or even mystique to it and is ,geographically correct" as well. But
regardless of what we're called, this city is at least on the move, and it is my prediction that this
town with everything it will be offering by the way of amenities, recreation and shopping is
going to be THE place to live, work and shop, and a destination well worth visiting by land or
water.
-2398-
04-22-2002 10:35AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 9524?20620 P.O1
4071 Suftset Ddve Box 385
$1xing Pa~ MN 55384..0385
Phone.- 9S2:-.471-717,5
Fax- t~2,.471-9151
E.ma~l- I~st, flet
El Uzge~lt [] ForRe~w. D ~~ O ~ease~.a~l~ 0 ~a=e~e
-2399-
04-22-2002 10:33AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 9S24720620 P.02
-2400-
04-22-2002 10:35AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 9524720620 P.03
-2401 - TOTAL P, 0~
FRESHWATER SOC
IETY
April 16, 2002
The Freshwater Society
is a tmblic, non-pro, fi~
environmental orgcm.lzation
dedicated to helping people
understand, prorccL and
manage freshwater resources.
Lake Minnetonka Ice-Out for the Year 2002
The ice was declared "OUT" of Lake Minnetonka at 2:46 A.M.,
April 16, 2002.
BC)AR1) (3F IblRECTOR~
M. 5%5<1 I~LWtOI1, il; Ph.D..
Reid C). Billig
Joseph J~ Bolos
Rictxard S. Galdecott. Ph.D,
R~chard G. Gray, Sr.. D Sc
Jol'm Holman
Daniel F. 13ndsay
Donald Tlmksse'n. Ph.D.
Donald CL Braum
The Freshwater Society and I wish to thank those ice-out "spotters" whose
interest and willingness helped determine the time and date of ice-out.
Particularly, thanks to Mr. Tom Warner of Deephaven, a former Board
member of the Freshwater, and Mr. Steve Gray, who has lived on the West
Upper Lake for many years and is most familiar with ice-out procedures.
Tom and I are responsible for the date and.time of ice-out If you have any
questions or comments, please call me at the Freshwater Society.
Thanks to all.
Dick Gray
Freshwater Society
2500 Shadywood Road
Excelsior, MN 55331
Phone: 952-471-9773
E-mail: freshwater@freshwater, org
Gray Freshwater Center - 2500 Shadywood Road o Excelsior, MN 55331
PHONE (952) 47%9773 FAX [952) 471-TR,qR .~., freshwater@fresnwater, org NmRmT www. freshwater, org
-2402-
-2403-
-2404-
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
LG555 - Government Approval or Acknowledgment For Use of
Gambling FUnds(previ0uslyLG503andLG265) (11/01)
Organization Information (please print)
Organization Name ,]'v~0 ~ Ab~ ~ "~-A~tE~',.3
Expenditure Description (attach additional sheets ifnecessa~)
1. Amount of pr°posed la~ul purpose expenditure ~ $ ~~ I
2. Check the appropriate expenditurecatego~:
~ontributlon to a unit of government - United States, state of Minnesota, or any of its subdivisions,
agencies, or instrumentalities. NOTE; A contribution may not be made directly to a law enforcement or
proSecutorial agency, such as a police depadment, county sheriff, or county attorney.
A wildlife management project that benefits the public at large with approval of the state agency that has
authority over the project.
Describe the proposed expenditure, including vendors.
Grooming and maintaining 8nowmoblie or all-terrain vehicle trails with approval by DNR. All trails must be
open to public use.
Describe the proposed expenditure, including vendors.
· I affirm that the contribution or expenditure, in accordance with Minnesota Rule 7861.0120, subpad 5D(10), does not
result in any net monetary gain or other pecuniary benefit to our organization.
· I affirm that when lawful gambling funds are used for grooming and maintaining snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle trails
or for any wildlife management project for. which reimbursement is received from a unit of government, the reimburse-
ment funds must be deposited in our lawful gambling account.and recorded on the LG 1010 - Schedule C/D repod.
/ /
Chief executive officer's signature Phone number Date
Government Approval/Acknowledgment
By sign;'ture below, the representative of the unit of gover, nment · approves the project as described above, and/or
· acknowledges the contribution, whic,h will not be used for a pension or retirement fund.
Address City : State Zip
Print Name .x""-' Title
~eted form attached lo the LG1010 - Schedule CID in yo~,,ganization's records.
This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e.
large print, Braille) upon request, ll~ you use a 'FFY, you can
call us by using the Minnesota Relay Service at 1-800-627-
3529 and ask to place a call to 651-639-4000.
The information requested on this form will become public
information, when requested by the Board, and will be used
to deteAmine your compliance with Minnesota statules and
rules goveming lawful gambling activities. For additional
information, check our web site at ww. gcb.state.mn.us
-2405-
THIS PAGE
IS
INTENTIONALLY
LEFT BLANK
-2406-