2002-12-10PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2002 - 7:30 PM
MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call
vote. There will be no separat~ discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
1. OPEN MEETING
PAGE
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
o
APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS
* CONSENT AGENDA
*A. APPROVE MINUTES:
NOV 25, 2002 SPECIAL MEEETING
NOV 26, 2002 REGULAR MEETING
DEC 2, 2002 SPECIAL MEETING
*B.
APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS, INCLUDING PAYMENT OF
CLAIMS THROUGH TO THE JANUARY 14th CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
*C.
APPROVE RESOLUTION CANCELLING JOINT COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR FIRE SERVICE BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITIES OF MOUND AND ORONO
*D.
APPROVE RESOLUTION AMENDING JOINT COOPERATIVE
AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR FIRE SERVICE WITH
THE CITIES OF MOUND AND MINNETRISTA
*E.
APPROVE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL 2003 GENERAL
FUND BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,837,750; SETTING THE
LEVY AT $2,814,100; AND APPROVING THE FINAL OVERAL
BUDGET FOR 2003
*F. APPROVE RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE
*G.
APPROVE PARTIAL PAYMENT REQUEST #3 BY BUFFALO
BITUMINOUS FOR WORK ON 2002 STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
5260
5261-5263
5264
5265-5283
5284-5285
5286
5287-5289
5290-5302
5303-5305
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
o
o
o
°
10.
11.
*II.
APPROVE PARTIAL PAYMENT REQUEST 32 BY SUNRAM FOR
WORK ON 2002 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
*I.
APPROVE EXTENSION AGREEMENT WITH UNITED STATES
POSTAL SERVICE TO JANUARY 6, WITH PENALTIES APPLIED
*J.
APPROVE READOPTION OF RESOLUTION #96-88 APPROVING
CUP TO ALLOW ZERO LOT LINE FOR TWINHOMES AT 5214-5218
DRUMMOND ROAD
*K.
ACTION APPROVING RENTAL SPACE IN THE DEPOT FOR USE BY
THE WESTONKA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY
ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.)
REVIEW OF SCHEMATIC CSAH 15 STREETSCAPE PLANS,
REQUESTING ACTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND AUTHORIZING
PREPARATION OF CONSTURCTION DOCUMENTS
SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT BY BUILDING OFFICIAL MATT SIMONEAU
ACTION ON PROPOSAL FOR ADDITIONAL WORK PERTAINING TO
WELL PROJECT
ACTION ON CHANGE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL COSTS CONNECTED
TO BALBOA LAND PURCHASE
ANNUAL STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
A. DISCUSSION/ACTION ON DRAFT #3 STREET RECONSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT POLICIES
Bo
ACTION APPROVING RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION
OF REPORT ON 2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
A. UPDATE AND DISCUSSION ON BID OPENING
Bo
5306-5310
5311-5320
5321-5326
5327
5328-5337
5338-5339
5340-5342
5343-5345
5346-5360
5361-5362
5363-5374
ACTION ON RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. ACCEPT ALTERNATE 8
2. AUTHORIZATION TO USE PORTION OF CONTINGENCY
3. AWARD OF PRECAST CONCRETE TO HANSON SPANCRETE
4. AWARD STEEL CONTRACT TO THURNBECK STEEL FABRICATORS
12. ACTION SETTING JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING COMMISSION
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
13.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
Correspondence: LMCD
Report: Mound Police Department -Nov 2002
Report: 2002 Operation Clean Sweep
Newsletter: Gillespie Center
Letter: Metropolitan Council
FYI: new liquor store construction agreement
Memo: LMCIT insurance forecast
14. ADJOURN
This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting.
agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. cin~ofmound, com.
5375-5378
5379-5399
5400
5401-5403
5404-5406
5407-5410
5411-5413
More current meeting
COUNCIL BRIEFING
December 10, 2002
Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!!
Dec 10 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
Dec 10 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
Dec 24 & 25 - Closed p.m. of 24th and all day Dee 25, for Christmas
Dec 31 & Jan 1 - Closed p.m. of 31 st and all day Jan 1, for New Years
Jan 14 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
Jan 14 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
Jan 14 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
Jan 14 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
Absences
Dec 11-18
Dec 19-24
Kandis Hanson
Kandis Hanson
Surgery
Telecommute part-time from home, as recovery allows
4.D. Fire Service Agreement with Minnetrista
We hope to provide you with the map of the Minnetrista fire district proposed to be covered by Mound Fire
Dept, at the meeting.
4.I. Extension for Postal Service
This postal service extension agreement has the City receiving its current rent rate for 20 days, rather than a
month. Under this extension, the City would gain access to the building Jan 6, which gets them past the holiday
Dur demo contractor has confirmed his availability on Jan 13.
4.K. Historical Society Rental Space
The Historical Society is looking for your approval of their proposal to rent the lower level of the Depot, as
described in the letter.
12. Special Joint Meeting
The Planning Commission wishes to meet with the Council regarding some timely issues, and is requesting a
date in January. Sarah will help with the discussion.
13.F. New Liquor Store
In a recent communication, I indicated we are eligible for rent compensation starting Nov 2002. That is not so
until Feb 2003. Pardon me.
Human Resources
The Liquor Store Manager job will be offered this weekend. If the candidate says yes to the position, the back
grounding with occur next week, and we expect to start someone before mid-January.
Attempts will be made to set interviews for Police Chief in late January.
Work has begun on a job description for the Public Works Director/City Engineer. pay equity points and pay
range as it fits into our pay plan must be established. Attempts will be made to start advertisements in late-
with the goal to have someone in place in May. This process will bring about the next phase of
reorganization within the City.
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 25, 2002
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on
Monday, November 25, 2002, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall.
Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David
Osmek and Peter Meyer.
Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community
Development Director Sarah Smith, Finance Director Gino Businaro, Parks Director Jim
Fackler, Public Works Superintendent Greg Skinner, Fire Chief Greg Pederson, Acting
Police Chief John McKinley, Mike Gilbertson.
1. OPEN MEETING
Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
2. BUDGET WORKSHOP
Department Heads were present to answer any questions the Council had regarding the
proposed 2003 budget. Adjustments were made to some line items. The budget will be
before the Council on December 10 for final approval.
3. ADJOURN
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adjourn at 8:00 p.m. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
ATTEST:
Mayor Pat Meisel
Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-5260-
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 26, 2002
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular
session on Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of City
Hall.
Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel, Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David
Osmek, and Peter Meyer.
Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk
Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Engineer John
Cameron, Tom Stokes, Chuck Alcon, Peter Flom, Dave Newman, Rick and Susan
Bloomquist, Michael Buelow, Al Jussim, Jim Dailey, Dean Lotter, Deb Grand, Ann
Eberhart, Greg Pederson
Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be
routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no
separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in
which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in
normal sequence
1. OPEN MEETING
Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:56 p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVE AGENDA
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to approve the agenda as presented.
voted in favor. Motion carried.
All
4. CONSENT AGENDA
Meyer requested that item 4C be pulled from the consent agenda for discussion.
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the consent agenda as amended.
Upon roll call vote taken, all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approve minutes of the November 12, 2002 meeting.
B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $510,437.13.
C. (removed)
D. RESOLUTION NO. 02-112: RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF
THE LICENSE AGREEMENT (#A14569) WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY
REGARDING ELECTRONIC PROPRIETARY GEOGRAPHICAL DIGITIZED
DATA BASE (EPDB) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN
THE EXTENSION AGREEMENT.
E. Approve on-sale 3.2 Beer and on-sale Wine licenses for Carbone's Pizzaria.
1
-5261 -
F. ORDINANCE NO. 17-2002: AN ORDINANCE PLACING TEMPORARY
LOCATION RQUlREMENTS ON ADULT USES IN THE CITY OF MOUND AND
DIRECTING A STUDY TO BE CONDUCTED.
G. Approve Change Order #3 for Post Indicator Lines on MetroPlains Development
Project.
H. RESOLUTION NO. 02-113: RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2002 (MOUND VISIONS 2ND ADDITION) - LEVY
#15605
4C. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Case #02-38: Tom & Tara Stokes - 5201 Waterbury Road - variance.
Meyer stated that he wanted this removed from the consent agenda to state that this
item is vote for approval of a variance, after staff and the Planning Commission
recommended denial. Meyer continued by stating that Mr. Stokes is the president of
Mound Renaissance, who has development rights to all of downtown Mound.
Hanus suggested language change to the subject resolution.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution as amended.
The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted
against: Meyer. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-111' RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR A SIX
(6) FOOT FRONT YARD FENCE AT 5201 WATERBURY ROAD, LOTS 1,2, & 3,
BLOCK 19, WHIPPLE, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PID #25-117-24-21-
0058, P & Z CASE #02-38.
5. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITE~,"
NOT ON THE AGENDA.
None were offered.
6. REQUEST BY DEVELOPERS FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION
Mayor Meisel stepped down for this discussion because she owns property in the Lake
Langdon Redevelopment District. Acting Mayor Hanus presided.
It was noted that discussion and background information for this item occurred during
the HRA meeting earlier this evening.
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to approve the extension of the Development
Agreement of July 23, 2002 between the HRA, the City, and Mound Harbor
Renaissance, LLC, until February 25, 2003. The following voted in favor: Brown,
Hanus, Osmek and Meyer. The following voted against: None. Mayor Meisel did not
vote. Motion carried.
Mayor Meisel returned to preside over the rest of the meeting.
2
-5262-
Mound City Council Minutes - November 26, 2002
7. LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING FIRE SERVICE BETWEEN THE
CITIES OF MOUND AND MINNETRISTA.
Fire Chief Greg Pederson gave the history of fire coverage with regards to the City of
Minnetrista.
Dean Lotter, representing the City of Minnetrista, reviewed their present fire coverage
and what changes will occur in the next year.
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to agree to the Letter of Understanding as
amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
8. DRAFT #2 OF STREET ASSESSMENT POLICIES
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to table this item until December 10th, so that
the City Engineer can gather more information. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
9. CHANGE ORDER #1 TO 2002 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
City Engineer Cameron reviewed the request for change order #1.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to approve Change Order #1 for the 2002
Storm Sewer Improvements in the amount of $20,629, and approve the Easement
Agreement with Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (Agreement #73-37522).
All voted in favor. Motion carried.
10. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. Correspondence: Mound Westonka Schools
B. Newsletter: Metropolitan Council
C. Newsletter: Hennepin County Sheriff's Dept.
D. Report: Public Safety Facility
E. Newsletter: Ehlers Advisor
F. Correspondence: LMCD
G. Newsletter: Xcel Energy
H. Notice; met Council Infiltration and Inflow Meetings
I. LMCC Dec 2002 calendar
J. Letter: Gillespie Center
K. Report: Finance Dept through Oct 2002
L. FYI: Correspondence with the City of Orono
11. ADJOURN
MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adjourn at 9:45 p.m. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
3
-5263-
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
DECEMBER 2, 2002
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on
Monday, December 2, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of City Hall.
Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Mark Hanus, David Osmek and
Peter Meyer.
Members Absent: Bob Brown
Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Finance Director Gino Businaro, Jerry &
Sandy Henke, Jeff Andersen, Kevin Flaig, Darren Poikanen, Paul Henry, Tim Palm,
Mike Palm, Ron Stallman, Roger Kryck, Dan Grady, Greg Pederson, Orv Burma.
1. OPEN MEETING
Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. TRUTH IN TAXATION PRESENTATION AND PUBLIC HEARING
Hanson summarized the proposed budget preparation process. Businaro presented an
overview of he proposed 2003 budget and levy.
Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing, and upon no public comments being offered,
closed the public hearing.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to cancel the meeting scheduled for
December 9, 2002, which was to be the adjourned truth in taxation hearing. It is
determined that this adjournment is not needed. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
3. PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING PRESENTATION
Fire Chief Greg Pederson gave a presentation showing the interior and exterior of the
new public safety building, which is to be built next Spring, and answered questions
regarding same.
4. ADJOURN
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to adjourn at 8:30 p.m. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
ATTEST:
Mayor Pat Meisel
Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-5264-
DECEMBER 10, 2002 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
112702SU E $3,796.50 NOV
112802SU E $3,130.08 NOV
120402SUE $4,285.02 DEC
121002SU E $243,438.06DEC
TOTAL
$254,649.66
-5265-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
11/26/02 2:23 PM
Page 1
Current Period: November 2002
Batch Name 112702SUE User Dollar Amt $3,796.50
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,796.50
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 112702 HANSON, KANDIS
Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $469.07
Invoice 112702
Transaction Date 11/22/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $469.07
Refer 112702 HEITZ, DONALD
Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $738.06
Invoice 112502
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $738 06
Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $96.90
Invoice 112502
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $96.90
Refer 112702 LAKE MINNETONKA CONVERSA TI
Cash Payment E 401-46510-300 Professional Srvs LOST LAKE RENEWAL $100.00
Invoice 112702
Cash Payment E 281-45210-430 Miscellaneous CITY WIDE RENEWALS $1,150.50
Invoice 112702
Transaction Date 11/26/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,250.50
Refer 112702 MiNNCObM pAGiNG
Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. 11-02 PAGERS $105.53
Invoice 20233311024
Transaction Date 11/22/2002
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $105.53
Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION KIVISTO,POUNDSER $100.00
Invoice 112102 PO 17494
Cash Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION HARDINA,TODD,KESTNER $150.00
Invoice 112102
Transaction Date 11/25/2002
.... Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $250 00
R~fer i127~
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH $96.69
Invoice 112202 PO 17527
Transaction Date 11/26/2002
............. Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $96 69
1127O2 RoBER';si
Cash Payment G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents REIMBURSE DEPENDENT CARE $789.75
Invoice 112602
Transaction Date 11/26/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $789.75
-5266-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
11/26/02 2:23 PM
Page 2
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
Current Period: November 2002
Fund Summary
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$2,190.47
$105.53
$1,150.50
$100.00
$100.00
$150.00
$3,796.50
Pre-Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Compute $3,796.50
Total $3,796.50
-5267-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
11/27/02 1:01 PM
Page 1
Current Period: November 2002
Batch Name 112802SUE User Dollar Amt $3,130.08
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,130.08
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 112802 HENNEPIN RAIL AUTHORITY
Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs EASEMENT STORM SEWER LINE $2,138.00
COTTONWOOD LANE
Invoice 111402
Transaction Date 11/27/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,138.00
Refer 112802 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cash Payment E 101-41500-300 Professional Srvs PENALTY AND INTEREST $992.08
Invoice 41-6005396
Transaction Date 11/27/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $992.08
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
Pre-Written Check
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$992.08
$2,138.00
$3,130.08
$0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$3,130.08
$3,130.08
-5268-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/04/02 11:21 AM
Page 1
Batch Name 120402sue User Dollar Amt $4,285.02
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $4,285.02
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 120402 FACKLER, JAMES
Cash Payment
Invoice 120202
Transaction Date
G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical
12/3/2002
REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE
$181.69
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $181.69
Refer 120402 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl
Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 10-19-02 THRU 11-18-02 CELL PHONES $420.86
Invoice 112202
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $420.86
Refer 120402 RAHN, JODI L.
Cash Payment G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents REIMBURES DEPENDENT CARE $721.65
Invoice 111402
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $721.65
Refer 120402 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (PA4/
E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels THRU 11-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $818.64
Cash Payment
Invoice 112302
Cash Payment
Invoice 112302
Cash Payment
Invoice 112302
Transaction Date
E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels
THRU 11-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES
$443.02
E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels
THRU 11-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES
$199.50
12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,461.16
Refer 120402 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (PAR
Cash Payment E 101-45200-212 Motor Fuels THRU 11-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $238.01
Invoice 112602
Cash Payment E 101-42400-212 Motor Fuels THRU 11-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $40.62
Invoice 112602
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $278.63
Refer 120402 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (POL
Cash Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels THRU 11-26-02 GASOLINE CHARGES $1,221.03
Invoice 122102
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,221.03
-5269-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/04/02 11:21 AM
Page 2
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
Current Period: December 2002
10100 Marquette Bank Mound
$3,642.50
$443.02
$199.50
$4,285.02
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$4,285.02
$4,285.02
-5270-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9:32 AM
Page 1
Current Period: December 2002
Batch Name
121002SUE User Dollar Amt $243,438.06
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $243,438.06
Refer 121002 A-1 RENTAL OF LAKE MINNETONK
Cash Payment
Invoice 19097
Transaction Date
G 101-22812 X-Mas Ornaments
12/3/2002
$0.00 In Balance
HOLIDAY DECORATIONS
$63.60
Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $63.60
Refer 121002 ACTION RADIO AND COMMUNICA
Cash Payment E 101-42110-418 Other Rentals INSTALLATION OF RADIOS $1,903.58
Invoice 2262 PO 17510
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,903.58
Refer 121002 ADVANTAGE BRANDS
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies FiRE LINE TAPE $41.42
Invoice 43810
Transaction Date 11/22/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $41.42
Refer 121002 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INCO
Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. BATTERY MONITOR $98.66
Invoice 0000051557
Transaction Date 11/22/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $98.66
Refer 121002 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $48.44
Invoice DC233009
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $20.40
Invoice DC232603
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $68.84
Refer 121002 ATHENA CARPET CLEANING
Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic CARPET CLEANING $729.53
Invoice 2359
Transaction Date 11/22/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $729.53
Refer 121002 BEARCOM
Cash Payment E 101-42110-418 Other Rentals PAGERS $4,070.59
Invoice 2171428
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,070.59
Refer 121002 BELLBOY CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $55.95
Invoice 25161000
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,687.20
Invoice 25160800
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MISCELLANEOUS $147.15
Invoice 36383200
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $49.25
Invoice 25100000
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $138.50
Invoice 25033500
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5,078.05
-5271 -
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9:32 AM
Page 2
Current Period: December 2002
Refer 121002 BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC.
Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 11-02 GARBAGE SERVICE $31.66
Invoice 113002
Cash Payment E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 11-02 GARBAGE SERVICE $31.66
Invoice 113002
Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 11-02 GARBAGE SERVICE $31.67
Invoice 113002
Cash Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 11-02 GARBAGE SERVICE $67.01
Invoice 113002
Cash Payment E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 11-02 GARBAGE SERVICE $36.82
Invoice 113002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 11-02 GARBAGE SERVICE $17.76
Invoice 113002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 11-02 GARBAGE SERVICE $20.39
Invoice 113002
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $236.97
Refer 121002 BMS INTEGRATED OFFICE TECHN
Cash Payment E 101-41500-210 Operating Supplies REPAIR TYPEWRITER $238.51
Invoice 73238
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $238.51
Refer 121002 BOLL, DANIEL
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00
Invoice 121002
Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25
Invoice 121002
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $261.25
Refer 121002 BRIMEYER GROUP, INC
Cash Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs SEARCH FEE PAYMENT $3,567,00
Invoice 120B
Transaction Date 12/312002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,567.00
Refer 121002 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 2/3 MINUS (CL 2) $346.30
Invoice 111502
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $346.30
Refer 121002 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS
Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 11-02 PAYMENT #3 WESTEDGE $35,100.55
IMPROVEMENTS
Invoice #3
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $35,100.55
Refer 121001 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREN T
Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 10-08-02 SUSSMAN, MICHAEL $40.00
Invoice 10025293
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $40.00
Refer 121002 CENTRAL PARTS WAREHOUSE
Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply PUMP KIT $175.00
Invoice 36877A
-5272-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9:32 AM
Page 3
Current Period: December 2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts MOTOR ASSEMBLY $151.73
Invoice 36702A PO 17491
Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Pads MOTOR ASSEMBLY $151.73
Invoice 36702A PO 17491
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $478.46
Refer 121002 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $354.98
invoice 61314295
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $354.98
Refer 121002 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 10-02 COPIER MAINTENANCE $346.80
Invoice 29789
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $346.80
Refer 121002 CY'SUNIFORMS
Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms NAME TAGS SUSSMAN,PETZ $11.39
invoice 13053
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $11.39
Refer 121002 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $69.10
Invoice 199966
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,381.80
Invoice 199954
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,450.90
Refer 121002 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $32.50
Invoice 327623
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,980.75
invoice 327622
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $146.00
Invoice 324952
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5,159.25
Refer 121002 EMMONS AND OLIVIER RESOURC
Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA NEW CITY WELL $1,117.00
invoice 126-01-0210
Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs NEW CITY WELL $1,117.00
invoice 126-01-0210
Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA NEW CITY WELL $980.50
Invoice 126-01-0209
Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs NEW CITY WELL $980.50
Invoice 126-01-0209
Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA NEW CITY WELL $4,163.83
Invoice 126-01-0208
Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs NEW CITY WELL $4,163.83
invoice 126-01-0208
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $12,522.66
Refer 121002 G & K SERVICES
-5273-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9:32 AM
Page 4
Current Period: December 2002
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 11-19-02 UNIFORMS $30.42
Invoice 398165
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 11-19-02 UNIFORMS $30.42
Invoice 398165
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 11-19-02 UNIFORMS $30.43
Invoice 398165
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 11-19-02 MATS $16.93
Invoice 398165
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 11-19-02 MATS $16.93
Invoice 398165
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 11-19-02 MATS $16.93
Invoice 398165
Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 11-26-02 MATS $45.36
Invoice 405139
Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 11-26-02 MATS $13.98
Invoice 405138
Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 11-26-02 MATS $84.34
Invoice 405140
Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 11-26-02 MATS $27.67
Invoice 405137
Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 11-12-02 MATS $105.17
Invoice 391236
saction Date !2/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $418.58
Refer 121002 GILLESPIE CENTER
Cash Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs CHIEF CANDIDATE LUNCH $208.00
Invoice 121002
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $208.00
Refer 121002 GRAINGERS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials BALLAST AND BATTERY $169.14
Invoice 495-706595-8 PO 17492
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $169.14
Refer 121002 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 634777
Cash Payment WINE
invoice 632164
Cash Payment LIQUOR
Invoice 631019
Cash Payment WINE
Invoice 631018
Cash Payment WINE
Invoice 631017
Cash Payment LIQUOR
Invoice 630626
Cash Payment CREDIT--LIQUOR
Invoice 601048
;tion Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5,539.15
Refer 121002 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
$467.25
$306.80
$3,471.42
$1,471.42
$42.25
$0.o0
-$219.99
-5274-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9:32 AM
Page 5
Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals CONTAINERS (8) $40.00
Invoice DM81554
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $40.00
Refer 121002 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO
Cash Payment E 101-41920-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 10-02 INTERNET SERVICE $35.76
Invoice 22107038
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $35.76
Refer 121002 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR (R _
Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 10-02 ROOM AND BOARD $1,106.00
Invoice 000782
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,106.00
Refer 121002 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
Cash Payment E 455-46379-300 Professional Srvs CTY RD 15 LIST $56.25
Invoice 2002-92
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $56.25
Refer 121002 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training TEXTBOOK FORSMAN $94.00
Invoice 00056531
Transaction Date 11/22/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $94.00
Refer 121002 HOME DEPOT/GECF
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts GUARD RAIL $20.00
Invoice LO21113
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Pads GUARD RAIL $158.56
Invoice 9131138
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Pads GUARD RAIL $158.89
Invoice 6031612
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $337.45
Refer 121002 IFP TEST SERVICES, INC.
Cash Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs PETZ PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAM $350,00
Invoice 103002 PO 17513
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $350.00
Refer 121002 ISLAND PARK SKELLY
E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery PLOW REPAIRS $823.98
Cash Payment
Invoice 11718
Cash Payment
Invoice 11831
Cash Payment
Invoice 11907
Transaction Date
E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTO TRANSMISSION FLUID
$92.95
E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTO TRANSMISSION FLUID
$92.95
Cash Payment
invoice 608117
Cash Payment
Invoice 608101
Transaction Date
11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,009.88
Refer 121002 JOHNS VARIETY AND PETS
G 101-22810 X-Mas Lights Donation/Expe DECORATIONS $11.72
E 101-41410-200 Office Supplies
HIGHLIGHTERS $6,98
11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $18.70
Refer 121002 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
-5275-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9:32 AM
Page 6
Current Period: December 2002
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT--WINE -$82.20
Invoice 208347
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$6.94
Invoice 208348
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $745.30
Invoice 1487134
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $184.00
Invoice 1487133
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $555.19
Invoice 1487132
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $828.90
Invoice 1487131
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $0.00
Invoice 1455273
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,224.25
Refer 121002 LAKER NEWSPAPER
Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs COUNTY RD 15 IMPROVEMENTS $55.00
Invoice 448
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $55.00
Refer 121002 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS
Cash Payment E 609-49750-328 Employment Advertising LIQUOR STORE MANAGER CLASSIFIED $138.00
Invoice 25615
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $138.00
Refer 122002 LUBE TECH, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials ANTIFREEZE $9.00
Invoice 891670-B
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials ANTIFREEZE $9.00
Invoice 891670-B
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials ANTIFREEZE $9.00
Invoice 891670-B
Transaction Date 11/22/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $27.00
Refer 121002 LUEDKE, JULIE M.
Cash Payment E 609-49750-305 Medical and Dental Fees 11-22-02 EYE GLASS $50.00
Invoice 122702
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $50.00
R;f;r' i2i00~< MADDE~'~A'N~ AND/Asso~;AT
Cash Payment E 101-49999-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $19.80
Invoice 103102
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $19.80
R;fe; i2i002 MARKblDiSTR}~TO~ ~
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 482402 $68.50
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $21.95
Invoice 482401
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,610.22
Invoice 482400
-5276-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9:32 AM
Page 7
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $97.50
Invoice 480083
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,084.90
Invoice 480082
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,883.07
Refer 121002 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 11-18-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $26.40
Invoice 11844
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 11-21-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $196.50
invoice 11865
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 11-26-02 DELIVERY CHARGE $18.90
Invoice 11894
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $241.80
Refer 121002 MASYS CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA PC/ENF SOFTWARE $4,916.23
Invoice 9828
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,916.23
Refer 121002 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH
Cash Payment R 601-37170 State fee - Water 10-01-02 THRU 12-31-02 WASTEWATER $4,605.00
Invoice
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,605.00
Refer 121002 MINNESOTA LABOR AND INDUST
Cash Payment E 222.42260-430 Miscellaneous REGISTRATION BOILER/PRESSURE $10.00
Invoice 001389
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $10.00
Refer 121002 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATIO
Cash Payment E 222-42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salaries 2003 DUES $3,600.00
Invoice 121002
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,600.00
Refer 121002 MOUND POST OFFICE
Cash Payment E 101-41910-322 Postage 2003 FIRST CLASS PRESORT $150.00
Invoice 123102
Cash Payment E 101-41910-322 Postage 2003 STANDARD $150.00
Invoice 123102
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $300.00
Refer 121002 MOUND, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 609-49750-382 Water Utilities 10-02 WATER AND SEWER $18.81
Invoice 111802
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $18.81
Refer 121002 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $87.36
Invoice 36973397
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $87.36
Refer 121002 PHILLIPS WlNE AND SPIRITS, INC
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,317.05
Invoice 895306
-5277-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9:32 AM
Page 8
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $808.30
Invoice 895305
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $405.30
Invoice 895304
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $3,530.65
Refer 121002 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $638.03
invoice 5503
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $1,884.33
Invoice 4905
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $2,522.36
Refer 121002 QUALITY WlNE AND SPIRITS
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$85.91
Invoice 194906-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $174.04
Invoice 194239-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $589.54
Invoice 194211-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $195.89
invoice 193979-00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,091.71
Invoice 193977-00
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $5.965.27
Refer 121002 R,C. ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings REPAIR DEPOT LIGHTS $778.50
Invoice 1106-02
Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings BALLAST KIT $361.39
Invoice 111802
Transaction Date 11/22/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,139.89
Refer 121002 RANDY'S sANITA TATION
Cash Payment E 101-41910-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 11-02 GARBAGE SERVICE $114.54
Invoice 1761
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $114.54
Refer 121002 SCL A-1 PLASTICS LIMITED
Cash Payment E 670-49500-210 Operating Supplies RECYCLE BINS $4,010.00
Invoice 38855
Transaction Date 11/26/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $4,010.00
Refer 121002 SHOREWOoD TREE SERVICE
Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 6240 DEERWOOD ROAD $239.63
Invoice 4314
Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 2233 LYNWOOD BLVD $905.25
Invoice 4313
Transaction Date 11/22/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,144.88
Refer 121002 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, I
Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 10-02 PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG $85,795.24
Invoice 0093738
-5278-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9:32 AM
Page 9
Current Period: December 2002
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $85,795.24
Refer 121002 SOS PRINTING
Cash Payment E 101-42110-350 Printing CARDS FOR $238.45
NICCUM,SUSSMAN,WOCKEN,PETZ
Invoice 64280
Cash Payment E 601-49400-203 Printed Forms WORK ORDERS $59.35
Invoice 64294
Cash Payment E 602-49450-203 Printed Forms WORK ORDERS $59.34
Invoice 65294
Cash Payment E 101-42110-203 Printed Forms PROPERTY CONTROL CARDS $153.76
Invoice 64299
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $510.90
Refer 121002 SPUR STATION
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 11-02 SQUAD WASHES $127.68
Invoice 113002
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $127.68
Refer 121002 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply WIRE $378.75
Invoice 7134
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $378.75
Refer 121002 STS CONSULTANTS
Cash Payment E 455-46379-300 Professional Srvs THRU 11-09-02 POST OFFICE DEMO $1,495.94
Invoice 237907
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,495.94
Refer 121002 SUNRAM CONSTRUCTION INCOR
Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs PAYMENT #2 2002 RETAINING WALL $17,201.16
Invoice #2
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $17,201.16
Refer 121002 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $9,030.45
Invoice 281089
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $25.70
Invoice 281088
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $38.00
Invoice 280467
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,728.90
Invoice 280468
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $12,823.05
Refer 121002 THYSSEN-KRUPP ELEVATOR COR
Cash Payment E t01-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic 12-02 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE $158.60
Invoice 102056
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $158.60
Refer 121002 TRUE VALUE, NAVAARRE
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $10.63
Invoice 110750
-5279-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9;32 AM
Page 1 o
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $10.63
Invoice 110750
Cash Payment MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $10.63
Invoice 110750
Cash Payment MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $41.85
Invoice 110730
Cash Payment FENCE POST $14~.87
Invoice 110913
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $88.61
Refer 121002 TUSHIEMONTGOMERYARCHITE
Cash Payment G 609-16200 Fixed Asset-Buildings 10-02 LIQUOR STORE $1,581.05
Invoice 15
Transaction Date 12/3/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,581.05
Refer 121002 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY
E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials
G 101-22812 X-Mas Ornaments
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
KEYBOARD SUPPORT
KEYBOARD SUPPORT
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
LETTER OPENER, ETC
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
$7.36
$7.36
$7.36
$7.36
$7.36
$2.45
$2.45
$3.68
$3.71
$33.39
$33,39
$398.44
$29.34
$22.26
$22.26
$22.26
$22.26
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 363635-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
invoice 363635-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 363635-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 363635-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 363635-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 363635-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 363635-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 363635-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 363635-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 365610-0 PO 17523
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 366074-0 PO 17523
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 364158-0 PO 17518
Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 264697-0 PO 17384
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 365683-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 365683-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 365683-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 365683-0
-5280-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9:32 AM
Page 11
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $22,26
Invoice 365683-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7,42
Invoice 365683-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.42
Invoice 365683-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11
Invoice 365683-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.15
Invoice 365683-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.09
Invoice 365860-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.09
Invoice 365860-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.09
Invoice 365860-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.09
invoice 365860-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.09
Invoice 365860-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.36
Invoice 365860-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.36
Invoice 365860-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.55
Invoice 365860-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.57
Invoice 365830-0
Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $8.62
Invoice 366024-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $17.25
invoice 366024-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $17,25
Invoice 366024-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1
invoice 365952-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.98
Invoice 365952-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1,98
Invoice 365952-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.98
Invoice 365952-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.98
Invoice 365952-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.66
Invoice 365952-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.66
Invoice 365952-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0~99
Invoice 365952-0
-5281 -
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9;32 AM
Page 12
Current Period: December 2002
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $0.97
Invoice 365952-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies $5.68
Invoice 366154-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $5.68
Invoice 366154-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $5.67
Invoice 366154-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies $8.40
Invoice 363805-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies $8.40
Invoice 363805-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies $8.40
Invoice 363805-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies $8.40
Invoice 363805-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies $2.80
Invoice 363805-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies $2.80
Invoice 363805-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $4.20
Invoice 363805-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $4.19
Invoice 363805-0
Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies $5.22
Invoice 363805-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $10.44
Invoice 363805-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $10.43
Invoice 363635-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies $8.40
Invoice 363805-0
Transaction Date 12/4/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total
$894.77
Refer 121002 WATERTOWN PARTS CENTER
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials CARBON $53.31
Invoice 329386
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $53.31
Refer 121002 WEIST, KATHY
Cash Payment E 222-42260-322 Postage REIMBURSE POSTAGE $11.10
Invoice 111902
Transaction Date 11/22/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $11.10
Refer 121002 WIDMER, INCORPORA TED
Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract REPAIRED GATE VALVE $1,087.50
Invoice 5665
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $1,087.50
Refer 121002 ZUCOARo, jAMES
Cash Payment R 601-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues REFUND WATER/SEWER $74.29
Invoice 112102
WALL PLANNER
WALL PLANNER
WALL PLANNER
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
-5282-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
12/05/02 9:32 AM
Page 13
Transaction Date 11/25/2002 Marquette Bank Mou 10100 Total $74.29
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
455 TIF 1-2
496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
670 RECYCLING FUND
10100 MarqueEeBank Mound
$41,439.10
$3,996.89
$275.09
$35,100.55
$1,607.19
$92,056.57
$12,906.46
$268.25
$51,777.96
$4,010.00
$243,438.06
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$243,438.06
$243,438.06
-5283-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
RESOLUTION CANCELLING JOINT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
AND
CONTRACT FOR FIRE SERVICE BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITIES OF MOUND AND ORONO
WHEREAS, On or about March 14, 1988 the cities of Mound and Orono did execute and
enter into an agreement entitled "Joint Cooperative Agreement and Contract for Fire
Services" (the "Contract"); and
WHEREAS, the Contract has remained unamended and in full force and effect since then;
and
WHEREAS, the Contract provides for cancellation by either party; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of Mound to cancel the Contract, and to provide the notice as
is required under the Contract upon the City of Orono.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the city of Mound,
Minnesota as follows:
The Contract is hereby cancelled, and the City Manager is hereby directed
to notify the Orono City Clerk of such cancellation, and to include therewith a
copy of this resolution.
In accordance with the provisions of the Contract, this cancellation will not
take effect until January 1, 2004; and the Contract shall remain in full force
and effect during 2003.
The City Manager is directed to work with Orono representatives to develop
a proposed new fire service contract between the two cities, in the hope that
a new agreement can be ready for approval and implementation prior to
2004.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Councilmember
and seconded by
Adopted bythe City Council ofthe City of Mound, Minnesota this
2002.
~day of December,
Mayor Pat Meisel
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
JBD-223954vl
MU220-3
-5284-
November 27, 2002
CITY of ORONO
Municipal Offices
Street Address: Mailin8 Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN
55323-0066
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364-1627
Honorable Mayor and City Council:
This letter is to serve as written notice of Orono's intent to cancel the fire service agreement
between Orono and' Mound effectiVe January 1, 2004. Orono has been pursuing options for the
provision of fire serVice to the Navarre area that embody the key elements Orono is committed to
making a part of its fire service relationships. These include a partnership-type relationship, joint
ownership, budget control, and a higher degree of certainty regarding long term costs. These
elements are essential to enabling Orono to effectively address the increasing challenges of
providing high quality, cost-effective fire service. Although Orono has appreciated the quality of
fire service provided by the Mound Fire Department, we have determined that we need to look to
other options to best provide fire service over the long term.
This letter is being copied to the city clerks of all contracting cities, as called for by the
"Termination" section of the contract.
Barbara Peterson
Mayor, City of Orono
CC: City Clerk, City of Minnetonka Beach.
City Clerk, City of Minnetrista
City Clerk, City of ShorewOod
City Clerk, City of Spring Park
Telephone (952) 2494600 · Fax (952) 249-4616
www: - 3?n.us
AMENDMENT TO
JOINT COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
AND
CONTRACT FOR FIRE SERVICE
THIS AMENDMENT, made and entered into as of this ~ day of December, 2002, by
and between the City of Mound, a municipal corporation in the County of Hennepin and State of
Minnesota, and the City of Minnetrista, a municipal corporation in the County of Hennepin and
State of Minnesota.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Mound and Minnetrista did on or about January 1, 2001 enter into an
agreement entitled "Joint Cooperative Agreement and Contract for Fire Service" (the "Contract");
and
WHEREAS, the Contract remains in full force and effect according to its terms; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the parties that the Contract be amended to provide for an
increase in the Fire Service Area for Minnetrista, and to reflect the revised cost calculations based
on the area increase.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties hereto, the
Contract is amended as follows:
Exhibit B to the Contract (the Fire Service Area Map) is hereby amended to the form
of the attached Attachment A.
In all other respects, the Contract shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect.
CITY OF MINNETRISTA
CITY OF MOUND
By: Its Mayor
By:Its Mayor
And
And
By: Its City Clerk
JBD-224145vl
MU220-3
By: Its City Clerk
-5286-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-xxx
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL 2003 GENERAL FUND
BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,837,750;
SETTING THE LEVY AT $2,814,100;
AND APPROVING THE FINAL OVERALL BUDGET FOR 2003.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby
adopt the following 2003 General Fund Budget appropriations:
City Council
Promotions
Cable TV
City Manager/Clerk
Elections/Registration
Assessing
Finance
Computer
Legal
Police
Emergency Preparedness
Planning/Inspections
Streets
City Hall Bldg & Srvs
Parks
Contingencies
Transfers
$ 75,990
3,750
50,000
257 150
1 080
79 630
215 100
28 640
135 55O
1,260,850
7,130
270,010
671,450
172,650
361,130
44,290
203,35O
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
$ 3,8377750
-5287-
Resolution No. 02-xxx
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
does hereby direct the County Auditor to levy the following taxes for collection in 2003:
SPECIAL LEVIES
Revenue-Lease Payments to Mound HRA
Bonded Indebtedness- 2001A Judgment Bond
Unfunded Accrued Liability of Public Pension Funds
G.O. Improvement Bonds 2001C
Total Special Levies
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE LEVY
FINAL CERTIFIED LEVY
381,830
22,560
33,350
2,600
440,340
2,373,760
2,,814:100
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
does hereby adopt the final overall budget for 2003 as follows:
GENERAL FUND
As per above
3,837,750
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Area Fire Service Fund
Cemetery Fund
Dock Fund
TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
550,410
9,140
,~41,230
700,780
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Recycling Fund
Liquor Fund
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
Storm Water Utility Fund
163,310
495,85O
679,880
1,121,210
141,020
TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS
2,601,270
2
-5288-
SUMMARY
General Fund
Special Revenue Funds
Enterprise Funds
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
Resolution No. 02-xxx
3,837,750
700,780
2,601,270
7,139,800
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Councilmember
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of December, 2002.
and
seconded
, and
by
Mayor Pat Meisel
Attest: Bonne Ritter, City Clerk
3
-5289-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota:
Fees shall be hereby established. In the event of a conflict between this schedule and the City
Code, the fee schedule shall prevail. An application or code provision may require payment of
fees for consultation with experts, professionals or other qualified persons or for other matters,
which may result in the imposition of a fee greater than listed in this fee schedule.
ADMINISTRATIVE FEES & CHARGES
400.20
Assessment search
Comprehensive Plan
Copies
Duplicate license/permit
Duplicate meeting tapes
Minutes
Notary (set by State)
Recycling container purchase
Recycling container replacement
Returned Check
Zoning Ordinance
COBRA Continuation Administration Fee
2002 PROPOSED
CHANGE
$20/search
$30
.25/page
$10 each
$3/tape
.25/page
$1 each
at cost
at cost
$25/check
$20
2%
AMUSEMENT & COMMERCIAL RECREATION
Amusements: (Set by State) Expire April 30
410.10 Mechanical Amusement Machines
Arcades: Expire Dec. 31st
405.00 Arcade Permit (fee per machine)
Bowlin_cl: Expire April 30
420.05 Bowling (fee per alley)
$15/location +
$15/machine
$15/location +
$15/machine
$20/yr.
1
-5290-
Carnivals, Shows, Entertainment:
482.10
Circus, show, game or concert
Indoor show
Outdoor show
Tent shows
2002
$100/day
$100/day
$100/day
Dance Hall:
450.60 Public dance or live music
Dinner Dancing:
451.30 Dinner Dancing
annual prorated
Parades:
472.00 Parade
$300~r.
$100/day
$750/yr.
$100/mo.
$300 min.
N/C
BUSINESS AND MISCELLANEOUS
Alcoholic Beverages:, Expire June 30th
810.15 3.2 beer license investigation fee
3.2 beer off-sale
3.2 beer on-sale
3.2 beer on-sale temporary(non-profit)
(for profit)
800.45 Set-ups (+State charges $150 for
Consumption & Display Permit
Temporary (one-day) set-ups
800.20 Liquor Lic. Investigation fee (in state)
(out state)
800.00
800.15
Liquor on-sale
Liquor on-sale/cabaret
Wine on-sale
Investigation fee
$500/investigation
$150/yr.
$500/yr.
$25/day
$50/day
$300/yr.
$25~ay
$500/app
Actual
(upto $1000)
$5,000/yr.
$5,000/yr.
$500/yr.
$500/investigation
2
-5291 -
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (CONTINUED)
800.15 Club license (regulated by State)
Membership 200 or less:
Membership 201-500:
Membership 501-1,000:
Membership 1,001-2,000:
Membership 2,001-4,000:
Membership 4,001-6,000:
Membership more than 6,000:
800.15 Sunday liquor
$300/yr.
$500/yr.
$650/yr.
$800/yr.
$1000/yr.
$2000/yr.
$3000/yr.
$200/yr.
Charitable Gamblinq:
Investigation fee (set by State)
$200
Commissaries
445.10 Commissary
$5/yr.
Car Wash: Expire January 31st
430.00 Coin operated
Automatic, drive-through
Automatic, conveyor
$100/yr.
$100/yr.
$100/yr.
Cigarettes: Now governed by the County.
Fireworks:
License to Sell Consumer Fireworks
Additional inspection if needed
$100/yr.
+$35
Garbacle Collection:
490.25 Permit Fee
$300/yr.
Peddlers & Solicitors: (Need permit from Henn. County before City can issue)
485.15 Transient merchants, Peddler, Hawker
One day $30
One week $50
One month $75
One year $200
Restaurants & Cafes: Expire April 30th
480.00 Restaurants and caf~ permits
$50/yr.
Taxicabs: Expire January 31st
484.10 Fee per vehicle
$25/yr.
3
-5292-
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION 2002
Buildinq Permit:
300.20 Wrecking permit
Minor building $50
Minor building to be replaced
on same site $50
Single family wood frame $150
Duplex $200
Multiple dwelling: 1st two units $200
Each addn'l unit $250
I nd ustrial,commercial, institutional:
Total cost of wrecking at $6 for each $500 or fraction thereof
of the market value of such work.
Gas burners:
Not exceeding 99,999 BTU
100,000 - 199,999 BTU
200,000 - 399,999 BTU
400,000 - 599,999 BTU
600,000 - 999,999 BTU
$10
$15
$3O
$44
$6O
Install/remove flammable & combustible liquids and
Tank not buried enclosed
500 gallons or less $10
Over 500 gallons $15
Tank buried or enclosed $25
Removal of combustible/
flammable liquid tank $15
Removal of storage tanks of
above/below ground liquid gas $15
LP tanks
311.00 Heating, air conditioning & ventilation
Contract prices
Gas piping
315.20 Trailers
Occupancy permit
Mobile Home Set-up Inspection Fee
$20 min. or 1% of contract
price, whichever is greater
$5 for up to 3 openings
$1 for each additional opening
$100
315.35 Appeal to applicant
$5O
330.20
Building Permits
Fire suppression
Inspection fees:
Plan check fees:
See 1997 UBC, Sect. 107, Table 1-A + surcharge
See 1997 UBC, Sect. 107, Table 1-A + surcharge
See 1997 UBC, Sect. 107, Table 1-A + surcharge
See 1997 UBC, Sect. 107, Table 1-A + surcharge
$75
4
-5293-
2002
PROPOSED
CHANGE
320.00
330.12
Public Lands Permit
Waiver of Platting Fee
Waiver of Platting Escrow
Contractor License Verification
$200
$2OO
$500
$5
Plumbinq Permits:
310.00 Permit Fee for major improvement ($500+)
Per fixture fee for major improvement
16B665 Permit Fee for minor improvement <$300
Permit Fee for minor improvement $300-$500
(Minor Impr. must be done by owner or
licensed contractor)
Per rough-in only
Per 100 feet of pipe or fraction thereof
Per 100 feet of repair or fraction
Outside sewer and/or water inspection
Private water well inspection
310.40 Additional inspections
$25
$10
$15
5% of improvement cost
(excluding fixture costs)
$10
$8
$5
$25
$25
$10
Wells:
305.00 Wells - per drilling or deepening $65
Buildinq Relocation:
Moving permit fee: not on State or County Highway:
(requires Conditional Use) $350
Moving permit fee: On State or County Highways:
No fee, but required evidence of insurance and refundable $250 cash.
CEMETERY FEES
Adult grave - resident
Adult grave - non-resident
Baby grave-resident
Baby grave-non-resident
Ash burial- resident
Ash burial - non-resident
Locate
Maintenance Agreement (June-Oct)
Ash burial placed on top of casket
$600
$850
$300
$400
$300
$400
Actualcost
(min $25)
$15/mo.
$50
5
-5294-
DOCKS:
435.35 Commercial Boat (fee per boat)
436.00
437.00
437.01
437.05
437.10
437.12
Commercial Dock Renewal
New applicant fee
Prior no-charge commercial docks
Slips
Prior no-charge slips
Boats stored on land
Prior no-charge boats stored on land
Shared dock application
Filed on or after March 1st
Penalty fee for unregistered boat
Shared dock application
Filed on or after March 1st
Temporary boat docking fee:
Up to 21 days:
Multiple Slip Fee
Penalty for unregistered boat
LMCD charge
LMCD charge (if variance granted)
437.25
437.25
Late dock license application fee on
or after March 1st (abutters only)
Additional late fees, per month,
starting April 1st (abutters only)
Dock/Slip
Sailboat mooring
Small watercraft
Shared dock
Senior citizen primary: 65 and over
Senior citizen: sharing
LMCD charge
LMCD charge (no boat)
6
-5295-
2002
$20/yr.
$500/yr.
$500/yr.
$250/yr.
$20 ea/yr.
$10 ea/yr.
$10 ea/yr.
$5 ea/yr.
$25
$25
$25
$3O
$250/yr.
$25
Actual
Minimum as set
by LMCD
$20
$10
$250/yr.
$250/yr.
$80/yr.
$80/yr.
$190/yr.
$60/yr.
Actual
Minimum as set
by LMCD
PROPOSED
CHANGE
$25/day
$4O
$100/yr.
$215/yr.
FIRE SERVICES:
Fire report (MFD Report)
225.27 Burning Permit
2002
$20
$1o
PARKS & RECREATION:
Depot rental- residents
Depot rental- non-residents
Key deposit
City Hall room rentals
$75/day
$150/day
$4OO
$75/day
PUBLIC GATHERING:
615.05 Park use fee: commercial events:
$300/day
POLICE SERVICES
Administrative:
Accident Report
Police report: up to 5 single-sided pgs
Addn'l pages, same report
Drivers license check: non-resident
Photographs: cost + reproduction,Film
Audio Cassette
Video Cassette
Dept. computer check
Dept. computer check/page
Dept. computer check/hr, computer
Finger printing: resident:
Non-resident:
False Alarm (per calendar year) 1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th_1 0th
ea. over 10
$10
$5
.25 ea.
$5
$25
$1o
$25
$1o
.25 ea.
$5O
N/C
$10
$0
$15
$4O
$25
$o
$o
$5o
$15o
$25o
$5oo
7
-5296-
Animals: Expire April 30th
455.05 Dog/cat license: 2-year, neutered or
spayed, with proof
After April of odd year:
Dog/cat license: 2-year un-neutered or
spayed
After April of odd year:
Duplicate Tag:
Kennel Fee: per day
456.75 Commercial Kennel:
Late application: on or after May 10 +
475.80
Redemption of impounded animal
First impound in current year
with current license:
First impound in current year
without current license:
2® impound w/i yeadlicensed
2® impound w/i yeadno license
3rd impound with current license
3rd impound without license
2002
$25
$12.50
$35
$17.50
$5
$15
$150/yr.
$1
$5O
$75
$65neutered
$75 un-neutered
$9O
$8O
$105
...plus license purchase if needed, plus kennel fees...
8
-5297-
EXCAVATION & LAND RECLAMATION
460.15 Grading plan review fees
*50 cu. yards or less
'51-100 cu. yards
'101-1,000 cu. yards
'1,001-10,000 cu. yards
'10,001-100,000 cu yards First 10,000 cu. yards
Additional for ea 10,000 cu. yards
or fraction thereof
'100,001-200,000 cu. yards
First 100,000 cu. yards
Additional for ea 10,000 cu. yards
or fraction thereof
'200,001 or more
First 200,000 cu. yards
Additional for ea 10,00 cu. yards
or fraction thereof
Additional plan review, due to changes,
additions, or revisions to approve
plans: Per Hour (Min. ½ hour)
GRADING PERMIT FEES:
*50 cu. yards or less
'51-100 cu. yards
'101-1,000 cu. yards
First 1,000 cu. yards
Additional for ea. 100 cu. yds.
or fraction thereof:
'1,001-10,000 cu. yards
First 1,000 cu. yards
Additional for ea. 100 cu. yds.
or fraction thereof:
'10,001-100,000 cu. yards
First 1,000 cu. yards
Additional for ea. 100 cu. yds.
or fraction thereof:
'101,000 cu. yards or more
Additional for ea. 100 cu. yds.
or fraction thereof:
2002
$0
$15
$22
$30
$30
$15
$165
$9
$255
$4.5O
$3O
$15
$22
$22.50
$1o.5o
$117
$9
$198
$4o.5o
$562.50
$22.50
$30/hr.
After hours inspection:Minimum charge (2 hrs) .
Re-inspection fees assessed under Provision
of chapter 305 (g) (UBC) $30/hr.
Inspection for which no fee is specified: (Minimum chg. ½ hr.)
Fee for authorizing additional grading under valid permit: Difference between
original and entire project.
9
-5298-
SPECIAL CONTRACTOR LICENSES
Heating, AC~ Ventilation:
Contractor registration:
Tree Surgeon: Expires April 1st
488.05 Tree surgeon (removal & treatment)
Street Excavation:
605.15 Street excavation:
Unpaved street
Macadam
Concrete or bade
2002
$0
$50/yr.
$100+$500 deposit
$100+$500 deposit
$100+$500 deposit
SUBDIVISION & ZONING FEES
320.00 Public Lands Permit
330.12 Waiver of Platting Fee
Waiver of Platting Escrow
350.475 Fence Permit
350.530 Zoning Variance
Variance escrow
350.525 Conditional Use Permit
CUP escrow
350.755 Vacation
350.1100 Wetlands Permit
350.520 Zoning Amendment
Rezoning escrow
Planned Unit Development
Site Plan Review
Commercial Site Plan Review Escrow
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
Minor Subdivision: Lot split
Per lot over 2 lots
Park Dedication Fee:
Escrow deposit - small proj. app.
Escrow deposit - large proj. app.
365.05
Sign Permit:
Sign alteration fee: Structural
alteration, up to the 1st $1,000
Temporary Sign Permit
$25
$200
$35O
$350
$35O
$35O
$1,700
$350
$350+$15/Iot
$350+$15/Iot
$250
$15
$1,100 or10%
$1,000
$5,ooo
$100
$50
$25
$200
$2oo
$500
$55
$5O0
$5OO
$5OO
$5O0
10
-5299-
UTILITIES 2002
Water:
610.25
610.35
Service Contract Violation
Water Meter (with MXU)
5/8 x ~
1
1-1¼
2
2 Hpt
3 Hpt
4 Hpt
2 tru/flo
3 tru/flo
4 tru/flo
MXU only
610.40
610.40
610.45
610.45
610.60
610.65
610.70
Water Meter Test
Remote Meter
Water gallonage rates
Service Charge
User fee
New Account Charge
On/Off at curb box (during normal
business hrs.)
On/Off at curb box (after normal
business hrs.)
Meter Installation
Meter Removal
Reconnection Fee
Sprinkler System
2 inch
4 inch
6 inch
8 inch
10 inch
12 inch
Water Trunk Area Charge (WTAC)
Water Service Connection Fee
Water Turn-on
Plumber Violation
Assessment Fee
$35/upon t-o
$250/meter
$50/test
$20/upgrade
$1.50/mo/act
$1.30/1000g.
$10
$35
Actual Cost
$17.50
$17.50
$35
$3/mo
$4/mo
$6/mo
$15/mo
$25/mo
$33/mo
$1500/u nit
$240/unit
$35/event
$100/viol.
$25/cert.
$250/meter
$275/meter
$335/meter
$455/meter
$585/meter
$635/meter
$860/meter
$1,435
$1,610
$2,170
$2,985
$125
$1.55/mo/act
$1.35/mo/act
11
-5300-
Sewer:
310.05 Master plumber registration $0
600.45 Connection to sewer, but not water $46.50/qtr.
Late fee penalty 10% additional
Treatment rates:
Residential:
10,000 gals or less $42min/qtr.
Over 10,000 gals/1,000 gals. $2.60
Minimum quarterly charge $40
Note: The above minimum applies to each single family dwelling or
apartment which is in accordance with existing sewer department
poficy.
$44.10min/qtr
$2.70
$44.10
Sewer (continued)
Commercial, Industrial & Multi-unit Dwellings:
3,000 gals or less
Over 3,000 gals/1,000 gals.
Minimum monthly charge/unit
Availability charge per dwelling
2O02
$14.00/min/mo $14.70/min/mo
$2.60 $2.70
$14.00 $14.70
$42.00 $44.10
Single Family Dwellinq - The sewer rate shaft be based on the actual water used. Water used but
not placed into the sanitary sewer may be deducted providing it is metered.
Two-Family Usage and Multiple Dwelling Usage - It is computed on the same basis as a single
dwelling, except that the total quarterly charges on afl such properties shaft not be less than the
number of units multiplied by the $14.70 $?~.O0/month minimum charge per unit. Water used but
not placed into the sanitary sewer may be deducted providing it is metered.
Dwellings Connected to Sewer but not Connected to Municipal Water- Shall pay a quarterly rate
of $~8.00 $71.40. If such users wish to pay sewer rates based on gallons of water used, they can
purchase a water meter from the City and have their own plumber install the meter on their weft.
Availability Char. qe - Aft dwellings not connected to the sanitary sewer must pay an availability
charge of $4Z-4~ $44.10 per quarter whether occupied or vacant.
Late Fee Penalty - For all bills not paid on or before the due date specified on the bill, a 10% late
fee will be added.
600.45
600.85
Sewer Availability charge(SAC) $1200/unit
(passes through to Metro Council Environmental Services Agency)
Sewer Trunk Area Charge (STAC) $1500/unit
Sewer Service Connection Fee $240/unit
Assessment Fee $25.00/cert.
12
-5301 -
Storm Sewer:
Single-Family or Two-family Residential
Cemeteries
Parks and Railroads
Public and Private Schools/Institutional Use
Multi-family Residential Uses
Commercial/Industrial/Warehouse Use
Churches
$4.89/Iot/qtr
$2/acre/mo.
$6.1 O/acre/mo
$10.20/ac/m
$24.50/ac/m
$41.10/ac/m
$10.20/ac/m
$5.13/Iot/qtr.
$2.10/acre/mo
$6.41/acre/mo
$10.71/ac/mo
$25.73/ac/mo
$43.16/ac/mo
$10.71/ac/mo
Miscellaneous Fees:
A miscellaneous fee shall be paid by the applicant for land use application expenses which the City
incurs in regard to the review and processing of that application, and which exceeds the
application fee. Such expenses may include, but are not limited to, direct City payroll and
overhead costs, fees paid to consultants or professionals acting as an agent of the City, the cost of
printing, mailing and supplies. Such miscellaneous fees shall come due immediately upon
notification by the City. The City shall provide, upon request of the applicant, a breakdown of the
various expenses incurred by the City. The City may withhold any final action on a land use
application and/or rescind prior actions until all miscellaneous fees are paid in full. The City may
request additional deposits if deemed necessary.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this day of
,2002.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
13
-5302-
Engineering ' Planning ' Surveying
December 3, 2002
Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
West Edge Boulevard
Street Improvements Partial Payment
MFRA #7827
Dear Kandis:
Enclosed is Buffalo Bituminous' Payment Request No. 3 for work completed through November 30,
2002 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $35,100.55.
We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the
Contractor.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
MYrRA
John Cameron, City Engineer
JC:rth
Enclosure
cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director, City of Mound
s:Xmain:Wlou07827:\CorrespondenceXhanson 12-3
-5303-
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-mail: mfra@mfra, com
Z
w
LU
tr'
F--
7
Q..
r,r'
7
0
I.c.
0
>-~
I.- tlJ
0 0
7
-- LU
~o<
u_m~
mO
n" D 1.1J
~Z~
~u. J7
u.I
m<
~ 0
7
o ~ @
° ~ ~
"r-
:
:
:
w
~
W
-5304-
w ~ ~
0
Er'
Z _
w
>.
88~8~°88888888~8~888~88888888888888 ~ 88~ ~
~ §§o ~o~o ~o ~
~ 88888~°8888888888°°888888888888888888~ oo 88~
o
889888888888888888~888888888888888888 ~ 888 8
~ o8o8ooo888oo8o88888o888888888~8o88888 888
~ 888888~88 88888~8888~88888888888888 ~ 88~
~ 8~o~8~~8oo~o8~~o8~o~8~oo~ ~ ~=
o~o~ooo88888~8~o~o~oooooo888o~
o~oo~8 ~ oo ~~ ~ 8o o o~o
= ~ ~ ~._-___- =~_ = ~ ~o~~
will
-5305-
Engineering · Planning ° Surveying
December 3, 2002
Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
2002 Retaining Wall Replacement
MFRA #13215
Dear Kandis:
Enclosed is Sunram's Payment Request No. 2 for work completed through November 30, 2002
on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $17,201.16.
We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to
the Contractor.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me.
Sincerely,
MFRA
John Cameron, City Engineer
JC:rth
cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director
Jim Fackler, Parks Director
Enclosure
s:~main:kraou 13215~specs\part-pay 12.3
-5306-
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447
phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532
e-marl: mfra@mfra, com
~ ~°ooo
o
O00~r
0 . 0
~ ~ ~ ~
- ~ : ~
-5307-
Z
mini
0
UJ
rr
I.-
Z
Imm
>- Z
~ UJ
uJ
~z~ ~
ou_ ~
-5308-
0
$~ oo ooo ~o oo oo o
gg g g~g~ g~g ~ gg g g§ g g~gg~ggg~gg ~ g
~} oo ooo oqq oo oo
8~ ~ 8~8~ 888 8 8 8~ ~ o~o88~8~o8~ g 8
' ' ' d~dd ........~ ~ '~ 'N~dd~; ~ '
~ oo ~ ~ o~
-= _ = ~ ]
go ~
-5309-
-5310-
DEC-06-02 10:Z0 From: T-$38 P.02/04 Job-338
FACILITIES SERVICE OFFICE
December 5, 2002
City of Mound
Attn: Kan(Sis M. Hanson, City Manager
5341 Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364-1687
RE: -- MOUND, MN - MAIN OFFICE EXTENSION
Dear Ms, Hanson:
As dlscusseQ with you, clue to unexpected delays in the oonstruction of the new
postal facility and the Christmas mail season upon us, we are requesting for an
extension. The Postal Service is requesting to remain in your building until January
5, 2003.
The Postal Service is proposing to pay $2,542.00 for the additional time from
December 16, 2002 through January 5, 2003, a total of 20 days. A lease
amendment will be prepared and sent for your approval if you find this acceptable.
Thank you for your cooperation in considering this proposal. If you have any
questions or concerns regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at (303)
220-6526.
Sincerely,
c. Walters
Estate Specialist
8065 E TUFTS AVE STE 400
DENVER CO 80237-31~81
FAX (303) 220-6511
(303) 220.6526
-5311 -
DEC-OG-OZ lO:gO From: T-638 P.03/04 Job-338
j UNITEDST IT£$ Lease Amendment
~O~TAL SERVICE.
Facility NamaJL,.cati~n Ameildmenl Number
MOUND - MAIN OFFICE (266560-001)
5501 sHORELINE ~LVD HOUND MN 55364-9998 Pr0]ect:~.56888 002
This refers to the Lease accepted by the United States Postal Service, hereinafter called the Postal Service. under date
of 04 / o7 / 1 ~ 92 whereby there is leased to the United States Postal Service the above-described postal facility,
WHEREAS the Postal Service desires and Lessor is willing to:
Arn~'~nd .] case
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, and for other good and
valuable consideration, the su/tlclency of which is hereby a~knowledgect, the parties do hereby agree to amend the
Lease as follows, effective 12/11/2002
Ex,.end ~hz.~, curro-nt ].ease from December 16, 2002 through January 5, 2003 for a on~: time
payment, of $2,542,00.
In all other respects, the Lease shall remain the same and is hereby confirmed,
Date:
Kandi~ Hanson, City Manager
Print Lessof~ Name Signature
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ltd MOUND MN 5536~-!687 (952) 472-0600
Number and Street Name, City, State and ZIP+4 Address ¢~f Lessor Telephone Number
Acoeptance By The Postal Service
JO~N C WALTERS
Contra~:til~g olllcer Signature of Contracting Officer Date
REAMENDGEN{Sapt. S§, v1.16, P)
-5312-
DEC-08-02 10:21 From: T-838 P.04/04 Job-33B
UNITED STATES
Form of Acknowledgment
for Corporations
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
Personally appeared before me, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid,
and
(Name of authorized officer(s) signing lease)
who is/are known to me te be the
and
(Titles of officer(s) signing lease)
of the
(Name of ColT)oration)
and
to be the same person(s) who executed the foregoing lease, who depose(s) and say that said person(-*) know(e) the seal
of the said corporation, mat the seal affixed to the above instrument is the seal nf said corporation, and that it was affixed,
and that said person(s) signed this lease by the authority of the said corporation, for ~e purposes set forth, and as said
person(s) own free and voluntary act,
Done at , in the County and State aforesaid,
thia day of ,
NOTARIAL
SEAL
Notary Public
My commission expires
NOTE: If the corporation is withowt a seal, that portion of ~e acknowtedgment referring to a seal should be stricken out, and
on [he blank line following this statement should be made: "and that the said corporation has no corporals seal,"
REACKC (Nov 9'7, v2.o, P)
-5313-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1587
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound.com
December 2, 2002
Mr. John Walters
Real Estate Specialist
USPS Denver Facility Services Offices
8055 East Tufts Avenue, Suite 400
Denver, CO 80256-2881
RE: Lease - Mound Post Office
Dear Mr. Walters:
The purpose of this letter is to once again confirm that the lease between tile City of Mound and the USPS
for the currem Post Office building expires on December 15, 2002.
As you may be aware, the City Council approved the demolition contract for the existing building at its
November 6, 2002 meeting therefore it is imperaliv¢ that the building is vacated as, soon as possible aud in
advance of the December 15u' deadline so as to allow for mobilization for the City s contractor.
Additionally, I wish to inform you that there will be financial penalties in the event that you go beyond this
extended deadline.
On behalf of the City of Mound, I would like to offer our assistance with any pending ribbon cutting
ceremony including the preparation of a local mailing list. It is respectfully reqnested that you keep us
informed of any proposed date.
If you have any questions, please feel fi'ce to coulact me during regular office hours at Mound City Hall
which are Monday - Friday frmn 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM.
Sincerely,
~Kan ~s Hanson City Manager
C: Mound Postmaster
_pdnted on recycled paper
5314-
October 23, 2002
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
John C. Walters
Real Estate Specialist
United States Postal Service
Denver FSO - 4th Floor
8055 East Tufts Avenue Parkway
Denver, CO 80237-2881
Re: Property at 5501 Shoreline Boulevard, Mound, Minnesota.
Dear Mr. Walters:
Last night the Mound City Council approved an amendment to the lease 'agreement for the
referenced property. Enclosed please find two executed copies. Please have one executed by the
USPS and returned to me.
This amendment 'has been approved by Mound, and is being tendered to you expressly
subject to two conditions:
As I stated in my October 15, 2002 letter, Mound will have no obligation to repair,
maintain or replace the premises during this period.
Although my letter of October 15, 2002 indicated that Mound would be willing to
listen to a request to extend beyond December 15, 2002, the Council made it clear
last night that it could not envision a circUmstance that would cause it to agree to an
extension beyond December 15, 2002. Consequently, it is important that the USPS
views December 15, 2002 as the last day that it can remain in possession of the
premises.
Your execution and return of the Lease Amendment will signify acceptance of those
conditions. Please forward the executed Lease Amendment to me by no later than October 31,
2002. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Yours truly,
Kandis Hanson
City Manager
Cc: Mound Post Master
) printed on recycled paper
-5315-
FACILITIES SERVICE OFFICE
UNITED ST/JTE~
October 17, 2002
City of Mound
Attn: Kandis M. Hanson, City Manager
5341 Maywood RD.
Mound, MN 55364-1687
Re: MOUND, MN- MAIN OFFICE - LEASE EXTENSION
Dear Ms. Hanson:
Enclosed are an original and two copies of the Lease Amendment with regards to
extending the lease date through December 15, 2002.
If you are in agreement with the Lease Amendment, please have all owners sign two
copies and return them to our office in the enclosed stamped envelope, retain a copy for
your files. The original executed agreements will be forwarded to you for your records.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (303) 220-6526.
Sincerely,
· Walters
state Specialist
ENCLOSURES
8055 E. TUFTSAVE, STE400
DENVER, CO 80237-2881
(303) 220-6526
Fax (303) 220-6552
-5316-
October 15, 2002
53,41 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
CITY OF MOUND
PH: (952) 472-0600
FA, X: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
US Postal Service
Denver FSO
.... 4th Floor .....................................................................................
8055 East Tufts Avenue Parkway
Denver, CO 80237-2881
Re: Property at 5501 Shoreline Boulevard, Mound, Minnesota
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing this letter to provide you with, information concerning the conditions for the
continued occupancy of 5501 Shoreline by the USPS. As you know, the postal facility lease for the
premises expired on September 30, 2002. Due to the fact that Mound can defer the demolition of
the building at 5501 Shoreline for a limited period without impaction on the timing of construction
of the new improvements planned for 5501 Shoreline, it is willing to permit the USPS to continue to
occupy the site until not later than December 15, 2002. Mound has contractual obligations to third
parties that require Mound to be assured of possession to the property by that date.
During such period, all of the economic terms that were contained in the expired lease will
be applied as will all of the other provisions contained in the expired lease except that Mound will
have no obligation to repair, maintain or replace the premises, and except that such application will
not be construed to create any right in the USPS to extend its occupancy of the premises beyond
December 15, 2002, even if the new facility is not ready for occupancy by that date, unless Mound
agrees in writing to permit continued possession beyond such date.
On the assumption that this. arrangement is acceptable to the USPS, Mound will accept the
rent payment recently received as payment of rent for the period October 1, 2002 through October
31, 2002.
If you have any questions about this matter, or wish to discuss it further, please feel free to
contact me.
Yours tm/y,
~. Hanson
Mound City Manager
Cc:
Gino Businaro, Finance Director
Mound Post Master
JBD-221728v 1
MU220-1
p~n~d.~on,.r,cyctec/ pap,r
5317-
UNITED STATES
POSTAL SERVlCE~
Lease Amendment
MAIN OFFICE-MOUND MN 55364-9998
-5318-
UNITED STATES
P~.
Lease Amendment
FacilityName/Lo~tion IAmendmentNumb
MOUND - MAIN OFFICE (266560-001)
5501 SHORELINE BLVD MOUND MN 55364-9998 Pr~ect:I29567
This refers to the LeaSe accepted by the United States Postal Service, hereinafter called the Postal Service, under date
of 04/0 ?/1992 whereby there is leased to the United States Postal Service the above-described postal facility.
WHEREAS the Postal Service desires and Lessor is willing to:
Amend lease
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein set forth, and for other good and
valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties do hereby agree to amend the
Lease as follows, effective 09/30/2002
Extend the current lease at the rate of $2,542 per month through no later than December
15, 2002.
In all other respects, the Lease shall remain the same and is hereby confirmed.
Date: j{~::~ ".=.2_~.---~.,~ ,~ ~,,..._~ ~/~
Print Lessor's I~ame Signature
CITY'OF HOUND
5341 MAYWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364-1687 (952) 472-0600
Number and Street Name, City, State and ZIP+4 Address of Lessor
Telephone Number
JOHN C WALTERS
Contracting Officer
Acceptance By The Postal Service
Signature of Contracting officer
Date
REAMENDGEN(Sept 96, v1.16, P)
-5319-
UNITED ST/JTE$
Form of Acknowledgment
for Corporations
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
Personally appeared before me, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid,
and
(Name of authorized officer(s) signing lease)
who is/are known to me to be the
and
(Titles of officer(s) signing lease)
of the and
(Name of Corporation)
to be the same person(s) who executed the foregoing lease, who depose(s) and say that said person(s) know(s) the seal
of the said corporation, that the seal affixed to the above instrument is the seal of said corporation, and that it was affixed,
and that said person(s) signed this lease by the authority of the said corporation, for the purposes set forth, and as said
person(s) own free and voluntary act.
Done at , in the County and State aforesaid,
this day of , __
NOTARIAL
SEAL
Notary Public
My commission expires
NOTE: If the corporation is without a seal, that portion of the acknowledgment referring to a seal should be stricken out, and
on the blank line following this statement should be made: "and that the said corporation has no corporate seal."
REACKC (Nov 97, v2.0, P) - 5320-
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-3190
MEMORANDUM
To-'
From:
Date:
Re:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
12/6/2002
Readoption of CUP / Minor Subdivision for 5214 and 5218 Drummond Road
BACKGROUND
The City Council approved a conditional use permit (CLIP) and minor subdivision for the
property located at 5214 and 5218 Drummond Road on September 11, 1996 subject to the
completion of certain conditions including, but not limited to, the submittal of an updated
survey, review and approval of the Declaration of Covenants and compliance with various
building and/or fire code issues especially with regard to the party wall. The document further
states that prior to the release of the resolution for filing at Hennepin County, the property
owner must comply with the specified conditions.
Based on review of the Subdivision Ordinance by City staff, including the City Attorney, it is
unclear whether or not a minor subdivision expires. Code Section 330.35, Subd 9 states that the
subdivider shall, if the final plat is signed by the Mayor and City Manager, record the final plat
with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within (60) days of the Council resolution
approving the final plat or it shall become null and void. However, from a procedural
standpoint, applications for minor subdivisions in Mound are not prepared in the form of a final
plat nor do they require the signature of the Mayor and City Manager. Additionally, state
statute is also silent with regard to this issue.
Due to the considerable lapse of time since the approval of this subdivision, City staff is
recommending that the City Council readopt the original resolution which would allow the
applicant additional time to complete the process and record the resolution. Members of the
City Council are advised that the building code issues have been satisfactorily resolved and the
new survey has been submitted for review. Additionally, it is City staff's understanding that the
Declaration of Covenants document(s) is forthcoming and will be forwarded to the City
Attorney for review and approval.
It appears that this issue may have not come up before as the majority of land use decisions are
usually filed immediately following City Council action or shortly thereafter. In order to
clarify the City's intent, City staff.would recommend that this section of the Subdivision
Ordinance be reviewed and/or revised accordingly.
-5321-
RESOLUTION/4 02-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO ALLOW ZERO LOT LINE TWINHOMES AT
5214/5218 DRUMMOND ROAD
LOTS 4, 5, 14 & 15, BLOCK 12, WHIPPLE
PID 25-117-24-21-0025
P&Z CASE 96-44
WHEREAS, the applicant, Mark Gileczek, has submitted an application for a
Conditional Use Permit to divide an existing two family dwelling into two single parcels of
record with the party wall acting as the dividing lot line, and;
WHEREAS, divisions of two family dwellings may be allowed only by Conditional Use
Permit in the R-2 Zoning District, subject to the conditions set forth under Zoning Ordinance
Section 350:630, Subd. 3 and 4, and;
WHEREAS, in this case, the common wall for the units was not built exactly on the lot
line, therefore, a minor subdivision is also proposed in order to modify the common lot line of
the two dwelling units, and;
WHEREAS, the Mound Zoning Code requires 14,000 square feet as the minimum lot
size for two family dwellings. The Ordinance also states, "Each lot so created shall contain no
less than IA the minimum land area requirement for a twin home dwelling," and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and unanimously
recommended approval, and;
WHEREAS, as a result of the proposed lot line shi~, the Westerly Parcel will have an
area of 6,972 square feet and the Easterly Parcel will have an area of 7,034 square feet, therefore,
the lot line needs to be adjusted to render both lots equal in size thereby eliminating the need for
a variance, and;
-5322-
WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance also contains a number of provisions that apply to
this case:
Separate services shall be provided to each residential unit for sanitary sewer, water,
electricity, natural gas, telephone, and other utilities.
No existing two family structure may be split into two separate ownerships unless and
until the common party wall fire rating is brought up to new construction standards
contained in the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Party walls must provide sound
transmission control ratings as per the UBC.
The owner of the property to be subdivided shall execute and record at their expense, a
"Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions" as approved by the City
Attorney.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound
does hereby approve the application for a Conditional Use Permit and Minor Subdivision to
separate the existing two family dwelling into single parcels of record with the party wall acting
as the dividing side lot line, for the property legally described as Lots 4, 5, 14 and 15, Block 12,
Whipple, PID 25-117-24-21-0025, subject to the following conditions:
Prior to release of this resolution for filing, the following conditions shall be fully
completed:
An amended survey must be submitted to the City depicting a minimum lot size
of 7,000 square feet for both the Easterly Parcel and the Westerly Parcel, and the
legal descriptions for both new parcels. This survey will be attached to this
resolution as Exhibit A.
b. Separate services for all utilities shall be provided as per City Code.
The common party wall shall comply with the fire rating and sound transmission
requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code (UBC), and as applicable,
the project shall comply with all building codes, fire codes and other regulatory
measures.
Prior to release of this resolution, the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions,
Restrictions and Easements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
2. The street frontage shall remain the same at 40 feet for each parcel.
This Conditional Use Permit and Minor Subdivision shall be recorded with the County
Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State
Statute, Section 462.36, Subd. (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this
property may be used.
-5323-
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin
County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject
construction must be issued, and the work completed prior to the recording of this
resolution and the filing with the City Clerk.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember __
Councilmember
and seconded by
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
Resolution adopted:
-5324-
RESOLUTION//96-88
RESOLU4~ON TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO ALLOW ZERO LOT LINE TWINHOMF. S AT
5214/5218 DRUMI~IOND ROAD
LOTS 4, 5, 14 & 15, BLOCK 12, WHIPPLE
PID 25-117-24 21 0025
P&Z CASE 96-44
WHEREAS, the applicant, Mark Gileczek, has submitted an application for a
Conditional Use Permit to divide an existing two family dwelling into two single parcels of
record with the party wall acting as the dividing lot line, and;
WHEREAS, divisions of ~Wo family dwellings may be allowed only by Conditional Use
Permit in the R-2 Zoning District, subject to the conditions set forth under Zoning Ordinance
Section 350:630, Subd. 3 and 4, and;
WI-~EREAS, in this case, the common wall for the units was not built exactly on the lot
line, therefore, a minor subdivision is also proposed in order to modify the common lot line of
the two dwelling units, and;
WltEREAS, the Mound Zoning Code requires 14,000 square feet as the minimum lot
size for two family dwellings. The Ordinance also states, "Each lot so created shall contain no
less than 1/2 the minimum land area requirement for a twin home dwelling," and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and unanimously
recommended approval, and;
WHEREAS, as a result of the proposed lot line shift, the Westerly Parcel will have an
area of 6,972 square feet and the Easterly Parcel will have an area of 7,034 square feet,
therefore, the lot line needs to be adjusted to render both lots equal in size thereby eliminating
the need for a variance, and;
WttEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance also contains a number of provisions that apply to
this case:
Separate services shall be provided to each residential unit for sanitary sewer, water,
electricity, natural gas, telephone, and other utilities.
No existing two family structure may be split into two separate ownerships unless and
until the common party wall fire rating is brought up to new construction standards
contained in the Uniform Building Code (UBC). Party walls must provide sound
transmission control ratings as per the UBC.
The owner of the property to be subdivided shall execute and record at their expense, a
"Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions" as approved by the City
Attorney.
-5325-
NOWj TH'ER.EFOI~Ej BE IT KESO~<~at the City Council of the City of Mound
does hereby approve the application for a Conditional Use Permit and 1Vlinor Subdivision to
separate the existinl two family dwelling into single parcels of record with the party wall acting
as the dividing ride lot line, for the property legally described as Lots 4, 5, 14 and 15, Block
12, Whipple, PID 25-117-24 21 0025, subject to the following conditions:
Prior to release of this resolution for filing, the following conditions shall be fully
completed:
ao
An amended survey must be submitted to the City depicting a minimum lot size
of 7,000 square feet for both the Easterly Parcel and the Westerly Parcel, and the
legal~ descriptions for both new parcels. This survey will be attached to this
resolution as Exhibit A.
b. Separat.e services for all utilities shall be provided as per City Code.
The common party wall shall comply with the fire rating and sound transmission
requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code (UBC), and as applicable,
the project shall comply with all building codes, fire codes and other regulatory
measures.
de
Prior to release of this resolution, the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions,
Restrictions and Easements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
2. The street frontage shall remain the same at 40 feet for each parcel.
3. .: This COnditional Use Permit and Minor Subdivision shall be recorded wi~ the:Count~
or:the Registrar of T~fles m Henri,pm County pursuant:Ao'Minnesota;State:~
~ tic,~ ~ , Subdivision (1). This shall be cons~dered'a restnction~omhow
be used.
4. The property owner shall have the responsibility of ~ing this resolution with Hennepin
County and paying all costs for such recording. A building for the subject
constru~fi0n.must be issued,-an~:; the: wOrk~[ic0mPlet~?ri~ '
resoluti°n and the filing with th'City
The foregoing resol/ltion was moved by Councilmember Hanus and seconded by
Councilmember Jensen.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affn'mative:
Ahrens, Hanus, Jensen, Jessen and Polston.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: None
Attest: Acting' Ci~
Mayor
Resolution adopted:
September 11, 1996
-5326-
IVESTONKA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
3740 Enchanted Lane
Mound, MN 55364
952 472-4893
The Westonka Historical Society is in dire need of storage space for our artifacts which includes
the usual papers, historical books, tools, photographs, etc. In addition, we need work space with
adequate lighting to catalog and/or create displays. Because of the nature of these materials for
storage, we have to be concerned about climate control, i.e. humidity and excess temperature
ranges. We also need handicap accessability. We are grateful for your offer of the basement of the
depot for temporary use and would like to compensate the City for its use. Would $300 per year
be acceptable? Please keep us in mind for possible space inside the renovated City Hall once your
needs are met.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Sue Cathers, Vice President
On behalf of the Board of Directors
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
l ln
Date:
December 5, 2002
To: Jody Rahn
City of Mound
5341Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364-1627
612-472-0600
From: Vera Westmm ~
Direct Phone: 612.252.7131
Phone:
Project:
Re:
CSAH 15 Streetscape
Project No. 01-23 File:
City Council Meeting of 12.10.02
Copies Dated
1 set 12.10.02
Remarks:
No. Description
Attached
Presentation Materials for City Council Review
[21 Copy of Letter
[] Specifications
[] Payment Request
Prints
Change Orders
Disk/CDs
rn Shop Drawings
Other
Action
As per Brace Chamberlain's request.
cc list:
~For your use
As requested
tn For approval
[] Approved as submitted
Approved as noted
Revise and resubmit
Review and comment
Other
Sent via
[] Mail
21 Fed-Ex
[] UPS
[] Other
/ Courier f 1 hour
2 hour
3 hour
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 555401-1659 Ph (612) 338-0800 Fx (612) 338-6838
-5328-
MEMORANDUM
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
To: Kandis Hanson, City. Manager
From: Bruce Chamberlain, ASLA
Date: December 4, 2002
Subject: CSAH 15/110 Streetscape - Schematic Design
Enclosed please find schematic-level plans for the County Road 15 streetscape improvements to
be installed along with roadway reconstruction in 2003 and 2004. Schematic plans are intended
to provide adequate detail to communicate design intent, uncover project issues needing attention
in subsequent design phases, and prepare an intermediate estimate of probable cost that is based
on measurable planned improvements. Schematic plans and comments to them will form the
foundation for later construction documents used to bid and construct the project.
The streetscape you see on the current plans is envisioned as only the first phase of broader
downtown streetscape improvements that extend to the edges of the downtown district including
Auditors Road, north and south CSAH 110, and east CSAH 15. Stretches of CASH 15 and 110
beyond downtown could someday have a more residential streetscape version that carries design
elements from the downtown streetscape all the way to the city limits.
We would like to present the plans to the City Council at their December 10 meeting for review
and comment. If the Council is comfortable proceeding with design of the project, an action
approving schematic plans and authorizing preparation of construction documents is requested.
Design Intent
At its core, the intent of a streetscape is to enhance roadway function and beauty and to make the
roadway a unifying element of downtown rather than a dividing one. The streetscape concept is
heavily focused on pedestrian safety and comfort through features such as sidewalk placement,
lighting and fencing. The streetscape concept uses landscaping, paving, lighting and furnishings
to unify the full-length of the corridors while at the same time building a crescendo of intensity
that peaks at the 15/110 intersection. The concept suggests a number of"zones of intensity" to
accomplish this.
The Mound Environmental and Appearance Model has played a major role in shaping the design
and materials suggested in the streetscape plans. Those same materials are used elsewhere in
downtown in places like the greenway and Mound Marketplace.
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
-5329-
Memo - County Roads 15/110 Streetscape Schematic Design
December 5, 2002
Page 2
Project Issues
There are a number of issues related to the streetscape project that are important to discuss and
keep in mind as the design progresses.
Parking and landscaping at the Commerce Place intersection: Expansion of the
intersection at 110 and Lynwood will impact Commerce Place parking. City and
County staffs are working closely with United Properties and Wells Fargo Bank to
find a balanced approach between aesthetic improvements at the intersection and loss
of parking.
°
Coordination with the Lost Lake Greenway: Due to construction timing of the
streetscape and greenway projects, a portion of work originally designed for the
greenway has been pulled out of those plans and added to the streetscape project. We
are currently coordinating with Hennepin County to determine whether the
improvements can actually be bid with the comity road project or whether the
improvements will be packaged with the Auditors Road extension plans.
Street lighting: City staff is meeting with Xcel Energy on December 11 to discuss
possible installation and maintenance agreements for the street lighting. Options for
the City range from having Xcel design, install and fully maintain the streetlight
system to having the system designed by an electrical engineer, publicly bid for
installation and entering into a third-party maintenance agreement. The range of
options and staff recommendations will be presented to the City Council at an
upcoming meeting.
Stormwater ponds: Stormwater ponds will be constructed in a basic but functional
form as part of the county road project. The ponds create excellent gateway
opportunities since they flank the roadway at Belmont Avenue. The schematic cost
estimate suggests the possibility of adding landscaping and fountain investments to
the ponds in order to enhance their aesthetic and amenity value. Feedback from the
City Council on December 10 on this matter is desired.
°
Municipal parking on the True Value block: Construction of a municipal parking lot
is planned for the True Value block. Staff recommends that the project be
constructed concurrently with county road improvements but under a separate bid
package. In addition, Mound Harbor Renaissance development group proposes that
this parking lot also serve as the Metro Transit park & ride in which case bus shelter
facilities would be added to the design. Feedback from the City Council on
December 10 on this matter is desired.
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
-5330-
Memo - County Roads 15/110 Streetscape Schematic Design
December 5, 2002
Page 3
Cost Estimate
The enclosed schematic-level cost estimate identifies a base streetscape cost of roughly 1.2
million dollars including a 10% contingency. This figure includes approximately $100,000 of
improvements that were originally part of the greenway project. An additional accounting issue
to keep in mind is that some level of costs included in the estimate for paving, street lighting and
a few other miscellaneous items will be shared by Hennepin County. The cost split for those
items will be identified in detail in the construction agreement between the City and County. The
City will also be applying for a roadway enhancement grant from Hennepin County for a roughly
20% share of the streetscape improvements. Special assessment of some of the streetscape costs
are included in the development agreements for Mound Marketplace and the Post Office and
staff suggests that special assessment for a share of the improvements be considered for other
abutting property owners.
We look forward to reviewing the plans with City Council at their December 10 meeting. If you
have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838
-5331 -
~oo ooooo oooog oooo 8°°°°
-5332-
-5333-
COMMERCE BLVD.
i
0
0
M:\ Motmd\ Cs~h 15\ 01-23\ Sheets\ CtyCncl_CD_Aprvl~Diagram_type
II
II
M:~ Mound\ Csah 15\ 01-23\ Sheets\CtyCncI_CD_Aprvl\ Masterplacdwg
I
o
M:\Mound\Csah 15\01-23\Sh¢cts\CtvCncl CD Am'vi\Plan Section
~ o
$341 Ma~o~l Roa~
~vlound, ~ $536.4
(952) 472-0614
MEMORANDUM
Date:
Re:
Honorable Mayor and City Coundl
Matt Simoneau, Building Official
December 3, 2002
Six month progress report
The Inspections Department has made substantial progress during the past six months and
has set numerous goals for 2003.
The following are the highlights of 2002: · The Department now provides all inspection services in-house
· Paul Waldron and Associates have been retained to provided back up inspection
services in the event the Building Official is absent
· The office hours established for the Building Official have been very popular with
homeowners and contractor~
· All handouts have been updated and new handouts have been created
· Detailed plan review comments and inspection procedures are now included with all
issued building permits
· An Inspections Procedure Manual has been created
· A contractor update meeting has been scheduled for March 2612003 and a
homeowner workshoPwill also be presented in March
· The Department is working with the Fire Department to provide Fire Code plan reviews
and inspections on new commercial construction
· An open house was held on July 16, 2002
· Articles have been provided for the City newsletter
· The Department will be participating in the Paint A Thon in August, 2003
· A violations tracking system has been established
· Progress has been made with enforcing section 300.10 of the City Code in regards to
completion of work
· Continue to follow up on building permits that have not been closed out
· All permits issued since June 1,2002 are now being tracked until completion
The following are projects slated for 2003: · The Department will be looking into the feasibility of hosting a home improvement fair
· Ordinance proposals dealing with survey requirements, landscape escrow and
driveway surfaces will be drafted
· Public service program on cable television
· Enlist unpaid building inspections interns from the community colleges
-5338-
David W. Willette
2542 Lost Lake Road
Mound Mn. 55364
Dee,04,2002
Kandis
As you know by now "Curves For Women" has relocated to the Willette Building
formerly the Mound Bowling Alley.
Janet Carlson purchased the Mound Curves for Women Franchise. Part of her business
plan was to relocate to a new and more visible location even if it meant shutting down.
Her proposal to us on Oct. 30,2002 was to rem our space and be able to occupy by Nov.
27, 2002 and not shut down.
I asked for and had a meeting with Matt Simoneau, our building official, on the
afternoon of Oct, 30, 2002. I outlined her proposal with a schedule of how I could meet
this unrealistic deadline. Matt was immediately interested and took a proactive approach.
He helped me with a through outline of what he needed to issue a building permit and
pointed out several code issues I might overlook. I left the meeting with the confidence I
could meet her proposal and called her and we signed a lease.
Our permit required 10 inspections. I was reminded that he would enforce the state
requirement of 24 hours notice for all inspections, although it wasn't what I wanted to
hear I am aware of the requirement. It is a good requirement because it allows building
officials to prepare a schedule, thus be on time.
The rest is history, with the cooperation of our subcontractors, with Matt's interest and
being on time, and while on site offering information that helped in preventing delays, we
were able to meet our unrealistic commitment.
Kandis, I am a firm believer that the attitude of being interested, helpful and cooperative
comes from the top and is expressed thru the various departments.
Dave Willette
-5339-
November 27, 2002
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Rd
Mound, MN 55364
EMMONS
& OLIVIER
RESOURCES
Subject:
Proposal for additional work pertaining to water quality
Dear Ms. Hanson:
The following proposal is for additional water sampling and analysis of the Mound water
supply. John Cameron and I have been working together on this issue as part of the new
municipal well siting.
:Background and Obiectives
Mound would like to construct a new municipal water supply well near Sorbo Park. The
well would replace the production capacity of existing Well #1 that will be abandoned
prior to construction of the new fire station.
K small-diameter "observation well" was constructed to test the water quantity and
quality at the Sorbo Park site. The teSts indicated that a full-sized well at this location
could produce a sufficient quantity ofwater.
The results of the water quality testing are of more concern. Some of the key results are
shown on the following table:
Analysis Observation Comment
Well
concentration
Arsenic 1.49 ug/1 This concentration is low, but other Mound
municipal wells have higher concentrations that
could be problematic in the future.
Manganese 510 ug/1 This concentration is high. It could cause system
maintenance and health concems. The manganese
concentration in other Mound municipal wells is
.~ unknown. We will evaluate whether a municipal
.~ treatment system would be a cost-effective way to
.~ address this Problem.
Radium 269 pCi/1 This is a 1°w concentration, but close to standards
.::, that will be enforced by the Minnesota Department
of Health in the near future. Radium is a concern in
other nearby municipal systems.
Making A Difference Through Integrated Resource Management
EOR, INC. · 651 Hale Avenue North · Oakdale, MN · 55128 · Tel: (651) 770-8448 · Fax: (651) 770-2552
-5340-
Hardness
440 mg/l (as
Cae03)
This concentration is high, but not much higher than
· the hardness concentration currently in the city
water system. Existing home water softeners
effectively treat this problem.
Our objectives for this project are:
-· Confirm the results from the test well with a second round of sampling
· Gather additional data about .the Mound municipal water system that will be used
to evaluate future water supply and treatment alternatives.
Work Plan.
We propose to conduct the following tasks:
Task I - Test well sampling and analysis
The test well near Sorbo Park will be pumped and sampled. Pumping will be conducted
by Traut,-Wells of Waite Park, MN (Competitive bids were obtained.)~ Samples will be
analyzed for compounds of concern identified during the previous sampling (Metals [Ca,
Mg, Mn, Fe, As, Ba], Radium, Gross alpha and beta radiation, and Hardness).
Task 2 - Wai~r system sampling and analysis
Water samples will be collected from the two Mound municipal wells (#3 and #7) that
will remain in use after the new well is operating. Samples will be analyzed for the same
compounds of concern listed under Task 1.
Samples will also be collected from two additional sites (Public Works building and the
Parks Department garage) to determine manganese concentrations in water already
flowing through the distribution system. These samples will only be sampled for
manganese.
Task 3 - Water supply management
EOR will provide professional services on an as-needed basis to develop a plan for
addressing water quality and water supply issues. We will work closely with the City
Engineer (John Cameron, MFRA) and City Staff.
Schedule
Task
Notice to Proceed
Task 1 - Test well sampling and analysis
Task 2 - Water system sampling and analysis
Task 3 - Water supply management
Completion Date
December 6, 2002
December 14, 2002
December 14, 2002
To be determined
Costs
Task 1 - Test well sampling and analysis
Includes labor and analytical costs. Well pumping costs
have already been previously approved by the City of
Mound and are not included here. Invoices for pumping
$1,100
-5341 -
costs will be sent to and paid for directly by the city.
Task 2 - Water system sampling and analysis
Includes labor and analytical costs.
Task 3 - Water supply management
This will be charged on a time and materials basis, so
total cost may be less than shown here. 'Cost is not-to-
- exceed without written authorization from the City of
~Mound. Cost is based on 50 hrs of professional,time.
Total
$1,100
$4,700
'$6,900
Please contact n-lc if you need more information.
Sincerely,
Smart Grubb, PG
Project Manager
-5342-
STS
CONSULTANTS
STS Consultants, Ltd.
10900 73rd Avenue North, Suite 150
Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369-5547
voice 763-315-6300
fax 763-315-1836
web www. stsconsultants.com
November 15, 2002
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re:
Change Order for Additional Costs Associated with Applying for MPCA Assurance Letters for
Lots 23 through 28, Koehler's Addition to Mound, Minnesota; STS Project 98783-XB
Dear Ms. Hanson:
STS Consultants, Ltd. (STS) is requesting a change order for additional costs necessary to complete the
above referenced project. STS submitted a preliminary cost estimate of $22,000 for this work to you with
our letter dated July 29, 2002. This cost estimate was preliminary based on our understanding of the
anticipated scope of work at the time. Additional effort has been required to complete the work over our
original estimate. The additional effort included preparation of an Addendum to the Work Plan, additional
field exploration/testing, MPCA meeting and subsequent memo, and extensive review of previous
environmental investigation work requested to be summarized by the MPCA as part of the "Off-Site
Source Determination letter" request.
STS estimates, based on our current level of effort, that an additional $2,500 is necessary to complete the
project. These additional costs are primarily related to report finalization and correspondence with the
various parties involved in the project. If the MPCA requests additional information following submittal of
our reports, additional costs above this estimate should be anticipated.
Please indicate your acceptance of this change order by signing one copy and returning it to the
undersigned. It is a pleasure providing environmental services to the City of Mound. We will be
contacting you to see if you have any questions regarding this change order or the project. Thank you for
selecting STS to work with you on this project.
Sincerely,
STS CONSULTANTS, LTD.
William B. Tepley
Senior Project Manager
Principal Engineer
WBT/dn
Enc.
cc: Mr. John Cameron, McCombs Frank RoDs Associates, Inc.
C683B007.doc
ACCEPTED:
Date Firm
Authorized Signature
Title
-5343-
100-LH-8 {4/02)
!~ ONSiLILTANT~
STS Consultants, Ltd.
10900 73rd Avenue North, Suite 150
Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369-5547
voice 763-315-6300
fax 763 -315 ~1836
web www. stsconsultants.c0m
November 15, 2002
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re:
Change Order for Additional Costs Associated with Applying for MPCA Assurance Letters for
Lots 23 through 28, Koehler's Addition to Mound, Minnesota; STS Project 98783-XB
Dear Ms. Hanson:
STS Consultants, Ltd. (STS) is requesting a change order for additional costs necessary to complete the
above referenced project. STS submitted a preliminary cost estimate of $22,000 for this work to you with
our letter dated July 29, 2002. This cost estimate was preliminary based on our understanding of the
anticipated scope of work at the time. Additional effort has been required to complete the work over our
original estimate. The additional effort included preparation of an Addendum to the Work Plan, additional
field exploration/testing, MPCA meeting and subsequent memo, and extensive review of previous
environmental investigation work requested to be summarized by the MPCA as part of the "Off-Site
Source Determination letter" request.
STS estimates, based on our current level of effort, that an additional $2,500 is necessary to complete the
project. These additional costs are primarily related to report finalization and correspondence with the
various parties involved in the project. If the MPCA requests additional information following submittal of
our reports, additional costs above this estimate should be anticipated.
Please indicate your acceptance of this change order by signing one copy and returning it to the
undersigned. It is a pleasure providing environmental services to the City of Mound. We will be
contacting you to see if you have any questions regarding this change order or the project. Thank you for
selecting STS to work with you on this project.
Sincerely,
STS CONSULTANTS, LTD.
William B. Tepley
Senior Project Manager
WBT/dn
Enc.
ert L. D~
Principal Engineer
cc: Mr. John Cameron, McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
C683BO07.doc
ACCEPTED:
Date Firm
Authorized Signature
Title
100-LH-8
-5344-
O O N S U LTAN TS
STS Consultants, Ltd.
10900 73rd Avenue North, Suite 150
Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369-5547
voice 763-315-6300
fax 763-315-1836
web www. stsconsultants.com
November 15, 2002
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Re:
Change Order for Additional Costs Associated with Applying for MPCA Assurance Letters for
Lots 23 through 28, Koehler's Addition to Mound, Minnesota; STS Project 98783-XB
Dear Ms. Hanson:
STS Consultants, Ltd. (STS) is requesting a change order for additional costs necessary to complete the
above referenced project. STS submitted a preliminary cost estimate of $22,000 for this work to you with
our letter dated July 29, 2002. This cost estimate was preliminary based on our understanding of the
anticipated scope of work at the time. Additional effort has been required to complete the work over our
original estimate. The additional effort included preparation of an Addendum to the Work Plan, additional
field exploration/testing, MPCA meeting and subsequent memo, and extensive review of previous
environmental investigation work requested to be summarized by the MPCA as part of the "Off-Site
Source Determination letter" request.
STS estimates, based on our current level of effort, that an additional $2,500 is necessary to complete the
project. These additional costs are primarily related to report finalization and correspondence with the
various parties involved in the project. If the MPCA requests additional information following submittal of
our reports, additional costs above this estimate should be anticipated.
Please indicate your acceptance of this change order by signing one copy and returning it to the
undersigned. It is a pleasure providing environmental services to the City of Mound. We will be
contacting you to see if you have any questions regarding this change order or the project. Thank you for
selecting STS to work with you on this project.
Sincerely,
STS CONSULTANTS, LTD.
William B. Tepley
Senior Project Manager
Principal Engineer
WBT/dn
Enc.
cc: Mr. John Cameron, McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
C683B007.doc
ACCEPTED:
Date Firm
Authorized Signature Title
100-LH-8 (~2)
-5345-
Engineering · Planning ° Surveying
December 6, 2002
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627
SUBJECT:
City of Mound
Street Reconstruction Program
Policies and Assessments
MFRA #13276
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Attached is Revision 3 of the proposed street reconstruction policy. Also included is a spread sheet,
which compares the two assessment methods for the area in Three Points that is being suggested as a
2003 project.
I will be available at the December 10, 2002 meeting to discuss the proposed policy and assessment
methods.
Sincerely,
MFRA
John Cameron, City Engineer
JC:rth
s:~nain:~nou 13276h'eports\coverlette~3
15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota ° 55447
phone 763/476-6010 ° fax 763/476-8532
e-maih mfra@mfra, com
-5346 ....
CITY OF MOUND
STREET RECONSTRUCTION POLICIES
INDEX
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
PURPOSE
GENERAL
DEFINITIONS
COUNTY ROADS
MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS
MAJOR STREETS
LOCAL STREETS
ASSESSMENT POLICIES
ASSESSMENT FORMULAS
DRAFT
-Version 3 ~
12/05/02 I. I/I 9/~2
-5347-
1.01
2.01
2.02
2.03
2.04
e
3.01
PURPOSE.
The purpose of policies is to establish a guideline and procedures for the reconstruction of
streets within the City of Mound.
GENERAL
This policy relates to roadway improvements eligible to be assessed under authorization of
Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 429.
Three basic criteria must be satisfied before a particular parcel can be assessed. They are:
The land must have received special benefit from the improvement.
The amount of the assessment must not exceed the special benefit.
The assessment must be uniform in relation to the same class of property within the
assessment area.
Assessable roadway improvement projects shall conform with the procedural requirements of
Chapter 429 which generally are as follows:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10.
11.
Project Initiation by Petition or Council Resolution
Resolution Ordering Preparation of Engineers Report
Resolution Approving Engineers Feasibility Report and Ordering a Hearing
Publication and Individual Notification of Hearing
Public Hearing
Resolution Ordering Improvement
Resolution Ordering the Preparation of Assessment Roll
Public Notice of Hearing on Assessments
Assessment Hearing
Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll
Filing of Assessments with Hennepin County
In addition to special assessments, other sources of funds are available to the City for street
purposes, depending on the type of project involved.
DEFINITIONS
The City of Mound contains various types of roadways. Descriptions of the City's street
classifications are outlined as follows:
DRAFT
-VERSION 3 2-
2
12/06/02
-5348-
e
4.01
4.02
Thoroughfares
These are important traffic routes which provide community continuity
and interconnect the City with neighboring communities. They are
usually spaced at one mile intervals, although they may be closer in
more heavily developed areas. When upgraded these roadways will
generally have 80'-100' rights-of-way and be of sufficient design to
handle anticipated traffic.
Collectors
Streets which are designed to collect traffic from individual properties
and feed into thoroughfares. They have 60-80' rights-of-way with 7 or
9 ton capacity and are generally spaced at one-half mile intervals.
Local
Relatively short streets which provide access to individual lots in
interior areas of development. Minimum right of way is 30-60'.
Cul-de-sac
Dead-end streets usually designed with a maximum length of 500' and
a mm around area of 30'-80' diameter at the property line. They
generally are constructed in interior residential developments.
Service Road
Streets which mn parallel and adjacent to a high volume roadway.
They are designed to serve individual properties along streets where it
is desirable to control access.
Alley
Roadways which are generally 12-20 feet in right-of-way width which
service properties on the rear property line.
COUNTY ROADS
The County Roads in Mound are:
CSAH 15 (Shoreline Boulevard and Lynwood Boulevard)
CSAH 110 (Commerce Boulevard and Bartlett Boulevard)
CSAH 44 (West Edge Boulevard)
CSAH 125 (Wilshire Boulevard and Bartlett Boulevard)
The total mileage of County Roads in Mound is approximately 7-1/4 miles.
These roads were originally designed as part of the County's highway system and were
meant to link rural areas with the urban centers. As Mound developed, these roads have
become an important part of the network of City streets. However, many of these County
Roads need to be upgraded in order to facilitate present and future traffic demand. Since this
DRAFT
- VERSION 3
12/06/02
-5349-
type of improvement is needed in part because of increased urban use it has been the County
policy to share the cost of the project with the City. Costs shared in this manner include:
2.
3.
4.
Right-of-way Acquisition
Curb and Gutter
Traffic Controls
Storm Drainage
4.03 Payment of the City portion of projects may be assessed and/or paid by City funds.
5. MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS
5.01
Regulations allow a municipality to designate up to 20% of its existing street mileage,
excluding County State Aid Highways and State Tnmk Highways as MSA streets. The City
of Mound currently has approximately 8 miles designated as MSA streets. The City receives
MSA funds on an annual basis which are allotted for maintenance and construction of MSA
streets. This money is part of the gasoline tax collected in Minnesota and is apportioned to
the community according to state guidelines based on population and road needs.
Maintenance funds are sent automatically to the City each year while the construction funds
are held in an account by the State until such time construction contracts are awarded.
5.02 The following are MSA streets:
Street
Tuxedo Boulevard
Three Points Boulevard
Lynwood Boulevard
Fairview Lane
Grandview Boulevard
Bartlett Boulevard
Wilshire Boulevard
Cypress Lane
Maywood Road
Hidden Vale Lane
Brighton Boulevard
Highland Boulevard
Idlewood Road
Ridgewood Road
Auditors Road
Belmont Lane
Leslie Road
From
Wilshire Boulevard (CSAH 125)
Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110)
Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110)
Lynwood Boulevard
Lynwood Boulevard (CSAH 15)
Wilshire Boulevard (CSAH 125)
Bartlett Boulevard
Maywood Road
Cypress Lane
Maywood Road
Tuxedo Boulevard
Bartlett Boulevard (CSAH 110)
Highland Boulevard
Idlewood Road
Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110)
Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15)
Brighton Boulevard
To
Minnetrista Border
Glen Elyn Road
Fairview Lane
Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15)
Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110)
Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15)
Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15)
Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15)
Hidden Vale Lane
Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15)
Wilshire Boulevard (CSAH 125)
Idlewood Road
Ridgewood Road
West Edge Boulevard (CSAH 44)
Shoreline Boulevard (CSAH 15)
Lynwood Boulevard
Devon Lane
DRAFT
-VERSION 3
4
12/06/02
-5350-
Devon Lane
Bradford Lane
Leslie Road
Devon Lane
Bradford Lane
Wilshire Boulevard (CSAH 125)
Cottonwood Lane
Maywood Road
Non-Existent Roads on MSA System
Lynwood Boulevard (CSAH 15) Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110)
Belmont Lane Cypress Lane
5.03
It is not the intent of the State Aid Funding Program to totally finance the MSA system.
Rather, it is designed to assist communities with street construction projects in an effort to
improve the roadway system statewide. Therefore, when an MSA street is constructed or
upgraded, assessments will be levied in accordance with the policies for major streets. The
assessment rate will reflect the benefit conveyed by the improved design, additional width,
and curb and gutter, and these rates will be set by the City Council on recommendation of the
City Engineer.
6. MAJOR STREETS
6.01
Major streets are considered by the City of Mound to be collector and thoroughfare streets.
Streets of this variety generally service local traffic as well as traffic from other areas and
therefore are designed in accordance with standards of a higher road capacity. Major streets
within the City of Mound are constructed with a minimum capacity of 9 ton per axle. The
primary source of funding for major roadways is special assessments and MSA funds.
6.02
Maje~ ~ New and reconstructed major streets shall be constructed with curb and gutter.
Street width shall be determined by existing conditions, traffic counts and patterns, and, if
applicable, MSA standards.
7. LOCAL STREETS
7.01
Local Streets are generally streets which service a small area and do not typically involve a
movement of traffic between areas. Local streets typically cormeet two collector streets or
county roads. Streets of this type include streets, cul-de-sacs, and service roads. Local streets
within the City of Mound are constructed with a minimum capacity of 5 tons per axle. The
primary source of funding of local streets is special assessments.
7.02 New local streets shall be constructed with curb and gutter. V?nen r Reconstructed i~ local
streets will include concrete curb and gutter si:all be in:talled in the following instances:
All streets with existing concrete curb and gutter or existing vertical asphalt curb.
All Municipal State Aid streets.
Local streets without existing curb and gutter.
DRAFT
VERSION 3
12/06/02 ' ' n orn'~
-5351 -
7.03
7.04
8.01
The new, unobstructed street width for new local streets xT .... ,^~, ~-~. ~;..; ....
........................... , ac o back o c is 28 feet. ~ ~,~.a~.~ ..... ~,~,~ ~, .... ,
~ shall be recons~cted at c~ent Mdth (~less a wider s~eet is desired by the
affected residents) but not less th~ ~emy-fo~ feet (24') ~less ~e Co~cil finds that:
A twenty-four foot (24') width would adversely affect trees or other significant or
desirable physical features: and
A-r-edueed The existing width does would not constitute a distinct hazard to life or
property and:
w~, .... ,.. ~. ...... ;,4~a o~.,.. :..~.,.~ ,...,...^, ~;...;,,~.~ +^ The current width p ovides
for safe access of emergency vehicles, snow storage requirements, ....
v-.~--e,' .... t.; .... ~.,~ aesthetics, and, to the extent relevant, availability of parking.
Streets which are over twenty-eight feet (28') in width may have parking allowed on both
sides. Streets ~ that are twenty-eight feet (28') or less in width will be subject to
parking restrictions on one side. Parking restrictions could be established at the time of street
projects or at any future date based upon general City parking requirements.
Factors to be considered shall include, but not be limited to, staff report regarding
safety and emergency vehicles access and neighborhood input.
Where streets are less than twenty-eight (28') in width, the staff shall assist the
neighborhood in identifying areas where existing street width can be increased to
provide additional parking.
ASSESSMENT POLICIES
When assessments are levied for roadway improvements on single family residential
property the assessment will be calculated in accordance with the formulas set forth in the
section on Assessment Formulas, using a unit method. The per trait (pamet) assessment will
apply equally to all ~ single family residential land within the improvement area.
A "unit" means an area of land which is capable of being independently developed
under the subdivision and zoning regulations in effect at the time of the assessment.
· ~-,~,.-~ .... ~, ...... :::~. Commercial, industrial and multi-lam parcels shall be
assessed using the combination front foot area and unit method.
DRAFT
-VERSION 3 g
12/06/02
-5352-
8.02
8.03
8.04
8.05
8.06
0 FV'7
The unit method will be used for assessment purposes on single family residential property
unless the ~-;*'-*':~ c-...~, m^, ...... a .... ;+ ~**'^~; ........ "~ ~' .... *;';~'" 53' ~'* ~ .... '
be-asea. City Council in its discretion determines that a different formula will more
equitably apportion the assessment among the benefiting properties.
The total project cost for streets constructed or reconstructed in any given project shall be
equal to the actual construction cost, plus associated costs such as legal, fiscal, administrative
and engineering.
When the City CONSTRUCTS A NEW LOCAL OR MAJOR STREET, 100% of the total
projects cost, including all utilities, will be recovered by assessing the benefiting property for
actual benefit received. A new street shall be defined as a roadway including curb and gutter
which had not previously existed.
When the City RECONSTRUCTS AN EXISTING LOCAL STREET, 2/3 of the total
project cost will be recovered by assessing the benefiting property for benefit received. The
remaining 1/3 shall be absorbed by the City. A reconstructed street shall be defined as a
roadway which existed previously. The addition of concrete curb and gutter when it did not
previously exist will be assessed separately at 100% of the cost.
When the City RECONSTRUCTS A MAJOR STREET or reconstruction is partially
financed by State Aid Funds to improve the design and capacity, the adjoining properties will
be charged an assessment equal to 2/3 of the cost of an average local street reconstruction
for a 28 foot wide street. Provided, however that existing single-family residential
property abutting two or four lane divided median roads will be assessed based on t44
1/2 of the cost of a standard 28 foot wide local street as if built at the time of the
assessment. The remainder to be paid by State Aid Funds or ~ other City Funds.
DRAFT
-VERSION 3 g
7
12/06/02
-5353-
~.09
8.10
The following items without limitation are to be assessable as part of a reconstruction
project cost:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Remove concrete curb and gutter
Remove concrete pavement
Remove/replace concrete steps
Construct and reinforce concrete steps
Remove concrete driveway pavement
Remove/construct apron 6" thick concrete pavement (residential)
Remove/construct apron 8" thick concrete pavement (commercial)
Common excavation
Core excavation
Construct concrete C & G Design B-618 or surmountable
Saw joint in concrete
Adjust manholes
Adjust catch basin
Adjust gate valves
Retaining wall
Electric conduit
Surfacing aggregate Class 5 100% crushed
Cultured sod with 4" thick topsoil in place
Clearing
Grubbing
Aggregate backfill
Replacement of driveway aprons
Construct concrete pedestrian ramps
Full-depth asphalt milling and overlay
Pavement reclamation
Turf restoration
DRAFT
-VERSION 3
12/06/02
-5354-
8.11
8.12
The following items may be billed directly or assessed to the ~ property owner
requesting said work.
2.
3.
4.
Sewer and water service line repairs
Random 6-8" concrete pavement
Random concrete sidewalk
Bitnminous driveway replacement
The following items will be paid at City expense when part of a reconstruction project:
2.
3.
4.
Remove, replace or relocate hydrants
Install hydrants and/or gate valves
Sanitary sewer and watermains repair and replacement
Storm sewer reconstruction or construction
DRAFT
- VERSION 3
9
12/06/02 11/19/02
-5355-
9.01
9.02
9.03
ASSESSMENT FORMULA
The per unit (par-eel-) method of assessment is intended to simplify the process by assuming
that all properties to be assessed will receive equal benefit. When the per unit method is used,
the individual parcel assessment will be calculated as follows:
ASSESSMENT
Total Assessable Project Cost
Total Units
Comer lots which are not divisible into separate units will only be assessed one unit. If the
two streets are reconstructed at different times, the comer parcel shall be assessed one-half
unit for each project.
When the combination front foot, area and unit method is used, the individual parcel
assessment shall be calculated as follows:
30 percent of the total cost to be assessed based on front footage. Comer lots shall be
calculated to include all front footage (front and sides). All lots shall be deemed to
have at least a minimum of 40 front feet.
ASSESSMENT = 30% of Assessable Project Cost x
Total Assessable Front Footage
Assessable Front
Footage of Lot
30 percent of the total cost to be assessed shall be based on the square footage of the
property to be assessed.
ASSESSMENT = 30% of Assessable Proiect Cost
Total Assessable Area
x Assessable Area Of Lot
3. 40 percent of the total cost to be assessed shall be based on a unit basis.
ASSESSMENT = 40% of Assessable Project Cost
Total Units
When using the formula contained in 9.02, · the following are additional factors to be
considered'
Triangle Lots - lots that form a triangle on two streets are to be assessed for footage
on the long side only.
DRAFT
- VERSION 3 g
10
12/06/02
-5356-
Multiple units other than duplexes are assessed on the basis of 3/4 unit per each
residential unit in the building (Example: a 50 unit apartment is assessed for 37.5
units plus footage plus areas).
Lots that front on a County Road and a street improvement will be assessed on the
same basis as other lots except that the units and square footage will be reduced by 50
percent.
Area of land formerly commons and now under private ownership, to be assessed as
part of the private property.
Large parcels (a number of combined lots) to be assessed one unit, plus area and
footage. Two separate parcels under the same ownership will be assessed two units,
plus area and footage if they both have enough area to qualify as buildable sites under
the present zoning.
Single lots under separate ownership fi:om adjacent property that do not meet the area
requirements for a buildable site will be assessed only area and footage.
Properties abutting alleys that are bituminous surface only, with no curb and gutter, to
be assessed the same as any other property except the front footage will be reduced
by 50% with a minimum of 40 lineal feet.
Properties which have the garage located across the street from the house will be
assessed on the same basis as other lots except the parcel in which the garage is
located will not receive a unit charge.
Lots that front on a street to be improved and which previously paid a full assessment
on another street improvement project will be assessed for the footage only with no
minimum.
10.
11.
12.
Parcels which do not abut a street improvement project but received the benefits from
the construction will be assessed for the project.
Lots that are adjacent to a 12' wide bituminous street installed for City purposes
which front another street in the project will not be assessed for footage on the side
street.
Triangular lots that are combined with a rectangular lot are to be assessed for footage
on the long side of the triangular lot plus the footage of the remaining lot or lots.
DRAFT
-VERSION 3 g
11
12/06/02 I. !/19/02
-5357-
9.04
13.
Duplexes are to be assessed on the basis of two units plus area and footage, with a
minimum on the footage of 80 feet.
14.
Lots that have streets on three sides are to be assessed for footage on the long side
and the average length of the other two sides.
15.
The cost of driveway entrances over 20 feet wide are assessed directly to the property
owner.
16.
Commercial or industrial property are assessed the same as residential property
except for the unit charge where the assessment will be 1-1/2 units per parcel.
17.
There is a maximum of 250 feet and 25,000 square feet per single family residential
parcel.
In certain unusual cases assessments may be determined by a "fair" comparison to other
assessed property. This will be recommended by the City Engineer and approved by the City
Council.
s:h-nain:h-nou13276~Reportskstreet reconstruction policies-version3
DRAFT
-VERSION 3
12
12/06/02
-5358-
-!-
0
z
m
rfl
rtl
m
z
rn
i--t
-r'
0
m
m
rn
o
z
0
Z
-5359-
m
~~ z
0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00~ 0 0 0 0 Z~
m
0~000~.0 .0~~ 0000000 ~
, ~
-5360-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 02-
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON
2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve various streets as shown on Exhibit A, and to
assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota:
That the proposed improvement be referred to McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
for study and that they are instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed
advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is
necessary, cost-effective, and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as
proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the
improvement as recommended.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Councilmember
and seconded by
The following voted in the affirmative:
The following voted in the negative:
Adopted by the City Council this l0th day of December, 2002.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
-5361 -
-5362-
I,IF~ ~E NO-' 1~71S
Page 1 of 2'
Kandis M Hanson
From:
To:
Sent:
Attach:
Subject:
"Todd Christopherson" <tchristoph@amconconstruction.com>
"Mound Fire Department" <moundfiredept@hotmail.com>; "Bontrager, Sam"
<sbontrager@sehinc. com>; "Britz, Miles" <mbritz@sehinc.com>; "Hanson, Kandis"
<kandishanson@cityofmound.com>; "McKinley, John" <johnmckinley814@yahoo.com>; "Smith,
Sarah" <sarahsmith@cityofmound.com>; "Bob G. (Laptop & Phone)"
<BobG.Laptop&Phone@amconconstruction.com>; "Prosser, James" <jprosser@ehlers-inc.com>;
"Ritter, Bonnie" <bonnieritter@cityofrnound.com>; "Schultz, Nancy" <nschultz@sehinc. com>;
"Simoneau, Matt" <mattsimoneau@cityofmound.com>
Friday, December 06, 2002 9:16 AM
Bid Tab 12 04 02 - e.xls; cost est MPS 11 02 airs e. xls
bid tabulation sheet
Good Morning
Attached are the bid results as verified by me after the bid opening.
There are a couple of changes from the results we reviewed at City Hall immediately after the bid opening:
1. The AME bid for steel erection has been withdrawn by AME owner Scott Vickerman. He faxed me a
notice of this yesterday afternoon. We had discussed this after the bid opening as an aroa of concern
since their bid was substantially lower then the other steel erectors.
2. VVe have listed Straughan Hardware as the Iow bid for supply of doors, frames and hardware,
Contract C-16. At the bid opening, it was noted that their bid did not include a bid bond and their bid
was not listed as the Iow apparent bidder. Since their bid amount is less than $50,000, the
specifications do not require a bid bond from them and their bid should be considered.
3. I have listed the combined bid of Serice Construction as the Iow bid for contracts C-08 and C-10
(concrete and masonry work) This decreases the Iow bid total, however, it also decreases the
amount of savings if alternate 8 (changing from stone to concrete form liner) is accepted. If that
alternate is accepted, Serice would lose the bid and it would go to Kelleher for C-08 concrete and
Axel Ohman for C-10 masonry. The City of Mound would realize a savings for alternate 8 of $61,228.
The first worksheet in the attached Excel workbook is the overall summary. Following that worksheet in the same
file are the bid results for the individual 32 contracts that were bid on VVednesday.
We had 151 bids which is a very good turnout. I know that everyone is disappointed in the bottom line result that
puts the total of construction costs after bidding at $156,120 moro than the total of the Amcon pro-bid cost
estimate. Keep in mind that the pro-bid estimate was $106,065 moro than the "budgeted" construction amount as
reviewed at our meeting earlier this week.
Recommendations:
Amcon recommends to the City of Mound as follows:
1. Accept alternate 8 - change from natural stone to form liner stone and decrease construction cost by
$61,228.
2. Utilize a portion of the $500,000 contingency to "balance" the project budget. This amount is
$200,960. (106,065 + 156,123 - 61,228)
3. Award precast concrete contract to Iow bidder, Hanson Spancrete in the amount of $723,334.
4. Award Steel contract to apparent Iow bidder Thurnbeck Steel Fabricators in the amount of $108,054.
The award of these contracts will be subject to final interview and verification of bids between Amcon and the
contractors.
Between now and the next Council meeting in January, the Building Committee, Amcon, and SEH will meet
regularly to discuss potential costs savings, bid alternates, and further contract awards.
Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above.
-5363- 12/6/02
Page 2 of 2
Thank you.
Todd Christopherson, P.E.
Amcon CM, LLC
Burnsville, MN 55337
952-808-5369 direct
952-890-0064 fax
612-490-7098 nextel
visit our NEW website at www.amconconstruction.com
- 5364- 12/6/02
-5365-
Mound Public Safety Facility 12/6/02
Mound, MN
Budget Work Sheet
Funding Source
Lease Revenue bond Sale Project Funds
HRA Contingency
Expenditures
Total
Protsct Devalol~ment Coats
AlE Base Fee SEH
A/E Reimbursables SEH
Scope Change Contingency SEH
Land Costs City of Mound
Legal Fees/Non Bond Kennedy/Graven
Financing Costs/Non Bond
Soft Cost - Miscellaneous to dateMiscellaneous
City Road & Utility Fees (SAC) MCES
Public Utility charges Excel
Geotachnical/Env[ronmental Services Braun
Surveying MFRA
Bid Adve~sement and Pdnfing To be Bid
Lease Cost of Temporary Facility
Moving Costs (two moves)
Construction Testing in Construction Cost
Sub-totals
Fumishtncls and Equioment
FFE Owner
Audio visual Systems To be bid
Secudty and Access Systems To be bid
Telephone System To be bid
Computer Network To be bid
Construction Cost
Building Hard Costs
Construction Manager Fee
Site Improvements
Demolition of Existing
Removal of Well
New (replacement well)
Contingency/Bidding & Construction
Recommended Alternates
Uncommltad Funds
Sub-totals
Contractors (to be bid)
Amcen CM
Included in Building
To be bid
Included in Demolition
NOT included in project
Sub-totals
Totals
(Fund Sho~age)
June-02
Schematic Budget
Estimate
November-02
90% CD Budget Estimate
December-02
Post Bid (12/4/02)
5,350,000
500,000
5,850,000~
5,350,000
500,000
5,850,000~
5,350,000 Ehlers/City
500,000 Ehlers/City
8,850,000~
Budget
Budget
371,25o
3o,5o0
50,000
0
2,000
3,000
48,832
2,400
50,000
8,300
8,0oo
30,000
47,880
15,1o0
0
371,25o
30,500
50,000
0
2,000
3,000
48,832
2,400
50,000
8,300
8,000
30,000
47,880
15,100
0
371,250
30,500
50,000
0
2,000
3,000
48,832
2,400
50,000
8,300
8,000
47,880
15,100
0
SEH
SEH
SEH
City
Kennedy Graven
Ehlers
City of Mound - Geno
City
MFRA/Amcon
Amoon
City
Amc. on
c~
City
Amc. on
667,262
667,262
667,262
132,000
8,500
14,400
17,200
3~700
175,800
132,000
8,500
14,400
17,200
3~700
175,800
132,000 City
8,500 C~ty
14,400 City
17,200 City
3~700 City
175,800
4,347,955
128,500
0
37,200
10,230
0
500,000
100~000
4,437,073
128,500
0
37.200
10,230
0
500,000
5,123,885
$5,966,947
5,113,003
$5,956,065
{116,647)11
(lO8,O88)11
4,593,196 Arnccn
128,500 Amcon
Amcon
37,200 Max Staininger,
10,230 Stevens Ddlling
0 City
500.000 Amccn
Amc. on
5,269,128
$6,112,188
(282r188)11
AMCON
-5366-
cost e~t MPS 11 02 alta e
Total Project Cost
CITY OF MOUHD
Meeting Minutes
Mound Public Safety Facility
Meeting held on 11/25/02
Date printed 11/26/02
The meeting was convened at 4:00 PM Monday, November 25, 2002 at Mound Fire Station:
Present:
Don Geiger Amcon TC Greg Pederson City GP
Kandis Hanson City KH Miles Britz SEH MB
John McKinley City JM Todd Christopherson Amcon TO
Discussed the presentation for next week. MB indicated that the work necessary to do what is requested is not
within their scope of work.
To do the graphics and PowerPoint that GP has discussed, would be an additional service of about $3,000.
KH expressed some frustration at the amount of time that had already gone into models by SEH without the
City's request. MB said that the models were needed by designers to do their design Work - he said that they
were necessary tools even though the owner did not find them useful.
4. MB suggested a middle ground that might be about half of the cost and work. GP to decide based upon further
input from MB and SEH.
5. At the presentation, TC will outline the bid process and altemates, etc.
6. GP updated the lease situation.
7. Twin City Garage Door will not provide a second opinion on the bid for fixing the door- they were the ones that
bid it to United Properties.
Color Schemes - SEH has brought three new precast samples - they are getting closer to the desired result.
There is a sample that is not in the base bid or alternate that is in between, GP asked if SEH could put that into
an alternate for the bids so that it can be considered as well.
9. The walk in cooler is out.
10. Phones, data, security is being worked on by vendor - GP to follow up on.
11. The silhouette designs have not been determined. These were not bid. They can be added at any time. We will
wait to see how the overall project comes in and then determine if they should be pursued.
12. Check with Matt to see if Met Council has evaluated SAC units. Also ask Matt if he has heard from Health
Department.
13.
KH asked about material to use for the request for donations for the monument sign, lighting, and flagpoles.
Amcon has done some estimates and breakout costs - SEH to do some sketches to go with Amcon estimates so
the KH can send out requests.
14.
MB reported that the printer had issued some sets of plans with the wrong pen color shading. The situation was
corrected by the printer at no cost and did not create a serious problem or delay with the bid process.
15. GP reported that the neighbor cities are still working on their contract issues with Mound.
C:\WlNDOWS\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Fites\Content. lE5LSJ2LV56GWIPS 11 25 02.doc
-5367-
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF MOUHD
Meeting held on 11/25/02
Date printed 11/26/02
16. Xcel has not responded to our requests and phone calls. TC to push this issue and get other contact names
from John Cameron if necessary.
17. Next meeting 12/2 will be combined with presentation. Meet at 6:30 at City Hall to review presentation and set
up the room.
18. The meeting starts at 7 PM with about 15 minutes allowed/assumed for the Truth in Taxation meeting. We will
follow that at about 7:15.
19. Furniture - GP has had some frustrations with Metro Systems. They were supposed to listen to police and fire
personnel and then come up with some designs, TC and MB to provide other vendor names
20. Meeting adjourned at 6:30 PM. Minutes by TC. Call if any missing items or discrepancy.
C:\WINDOWS\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5\5J2LV56G~MPS 11 25 02,doc
-5368-
Page 2 of 2
CiTY OF MOUHD
Meeting Minutes
Mound Public Safety Facility
Meeting held on 11/4/02
Date printed 11/26/02
The meeting was convened at 4:00 PM Monday, November 4, 2002 at Mound Fire Station:
Present:
Don Geiger Amcon TC Greg Pederson City GP
Kandis Hanson City KH Miles Britz SEH MB
John McKinley City JM
1. Drawings will be issued November 11, with bids due on December 4.
2. United Properties is correcting the lease for the temporary fire station.
3. Antennas to be located on the roof of the apparatus bay, adjacent to the office section. SEH to indicate conduit
from dispatch to antenna location.
4. Amcon to supply price estimate for monument sign. Pricing to include sign, lighting and flag poles.
5. Estimate includes gray stained concrete and form liners at planters, retaining walls and monument piers.
6. There will be no reom for the donated walk-in cooler.
7. Greg was contacted by John Tauer of Applied Business Communications, Inc.; they are a design/build
communications contractor specializing in phones, data, security, intercom, CCTV and cable TV. His phone
number is 651-643-6622.
8. Mound is working on furniture layout; they are not picking any colors or systems details.
9. Discussed the police and fire silhouette designs for the front of the building and the options of recessed into
precast concrete or pin mounted sign.
10. Miles to call Matt at the City of Mound to verify the number of sets of plans required for review.
11. Mound is working to resolve financial issues with neighboring cities.
12. Amcon to revise budget with final drawings.
13. Todd to review site prep and buried utilities.
14. Meet with City Council on December 2 to review design and budget. Kandis to notify team on time.
15. Meeting adjourned at 5:00 PM. Minutes by DG. Call if any missing items or discrepancy.
C:\WINDOWS\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5\5J2LV56G~,lPS 11 4 02.doc
-5369-
Page 1 of 1
-5370-
-5371 -
-5372-
Kandis M Hanson
Page 1 of 1
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
"Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith@cityofmound.com>
"Kandis M Hanson" <KandisHanson@cityofmound.com>
Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:30 PM
Re: PS building
Hi Kandis.
The City approved a variance for the hose tower for the Public Safety building as part of the CUP which was
approved by the City Council in July 2002. Proposed height of the tower is (60) feet and the maximum height
allowed in the R-1 District is (35) feet. Details regarding the City's review are contained in Planning Report No.
02-24 / 02-25.
The current R-1 zoning setbacks require (30) feet on the front yard(s), (10) feet on the site yards and (15) feet at
the rear yards. As per site development plans from SEH dated June 28, 2002, the proposed building meets all
setback requirements.
Sarah Smith
Community Development Director
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
952-472-3190 - work
952-472-0620 - fax
.... Original Message .....
From: Kandis M Hanson
To: Sarah Smith
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:14 PM
Subject: PS building
Mark Hanus asked that we check to see if the hose tower on the new building needs a variance. Also,
to double check all the setbacks on the project. Please do a written opinion letter to go in the packet
on Friday.
Thanks
Kandis Hanson
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
952-472-0609: W
952-472-0620: F
- 5373- 12/3/02
Page 1 of 1
Kandis M Hanson
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
"Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith@cityofmound.com>
"Kandis M Hanson" <KandisHanson@cityofmound.com>
Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:31 PM
Re: PS building
Regarding the P.S. building, a hardcover variance was also approved to exceed the (40) percent imperivous
surface maximum. Site plans indicate that 51% coverage will be allowed.
Sarah Smith
Community Development Director
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
952-472-3190 - work
952-472-0620 - fax
..... Original Message .....
From: Kandis M Hanson
To: Sarah Smith
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:14 PM
Subject: PS building
Mark Hanus asked that we check to see if the hose tower on the new building needs a variance. Also,
to double check all the setbacks on the project. Please do a written opinion letter to go in the packet
on Friday.
Thanks
Kandis Hanson
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
952-472-0609: W
952-472-0620: F
- 5374- 12/3/02
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE
AGENDA
8:30 A.M., Friday, December 13, 2002
LMCD Office
18338 Minnetonka Blvd., Deephaven
1. Introductions and Welcome;
2. Review of Minutes from the 9/13/02 meeting;
3. Discussion of 2002 LMCD EWM Harvesting Program Final Report;
4. Discussion of "Let's Keep Zebra Mussel Out of Lake Minnetonka Report and Recommendations: 2002
Pilot Inspection Program";
5. AgencY Reports:
6. Area wide lake association reports;
7. Old business;
8, New business;
9. Adjournment;
-5375-
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
EVVM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE
MINUTES
8:30 a.m., Friday, September 13, 2002
LMCD Office, 18338 Mtka Blvd., Deephaven, MN
Present: Herb Suedh, LMCD Board; Chip Welling, MN DNR; John Baden, Three Rivers Park District; Nell
Vanderbosch, MN DNR; Greg Nybeck, LMCD Executive Director.
Minutes.
The Task Force accepted the minutes from the 7/12/02 EWM/Exotics Task Force meeting as submitted.
Update of 2002 LMCD Eurasian Watermilfoil (EWM) Harvesting Program,
Nybeck stated that the final report for the 2002 EWM 'Harvesting Program was being prepared and would
be forwarded in the near future for review. He detailed the highlights of the 2002 season, which included:
· The high lake level conditions on Lake Minnetonka and the impact it has had on milfoil growth,
especially matted areas.
The statistics in 2002, primarily truck loads, harvester loads, and acres harvested, will probably be
slightly down in 2002 compared to other recent years, primarily due to the high-water conditions.
A hand-held Global Positioning System (GPS) has recently been purchased to improve the program
in its buoy placement and estimated acreage. Some preliminary information will be experimented
with in 2002; however~ the actual use of it in conjunction with the program will be implemented in
2003.
· He addressed the improvements made the past few years with the maintenance of the EWU
harvesting equipment and how it has improved the efficiency of the program.
· The Distdct is considering the purchase of a new harvester and the trade-in of possibly two
harvesters for the 2003 season, noting that the harvester purchased a few years ago is much more
productive than the original harvesters purchased.
· The number of calls received from the public were down from past years and were primarily from
residents that had fragmented milfoil along their shoreline rather than milfoil groWth in the lake itself.
The Task Force discussed :a number of issues pertaining to this agenda item. Two of them included:
· A number of otheHakes around the State of Minnesota and:in the Lake Minnetonka area also had
high lake.level conditions that had an' impact on matted areas.~
· Harvesting programs and the public perception that fragmented milfoil and other vegetation is
primarily caused by them. The general Public does not take 'into consideration that wind, waves,
and propellers are primary COntributors to fragmented miifoil and other vegetation.
Suerth stated that an E,WM Ha~esting Program Working Group Meeting shOuld be conducted in the near
future to evaluate the 2002 season and begin preparationS'for 2003.
Update of "Let's Keep Zebra Mussels Out of Lake Minnetonka" PrOject
Nybeck stated'that the 2002 pilot pmgram that included inspection of W~te~ctaft by MN DNR employees at
Maxwell Bay, North Arm, and Spdng Park public had recently concluded, The program began on July 17th
and continued through September 7th, with a final report to be PrePared by the District and the LMA. He
reviewed a spreadsheet that highlighted Peak hour and non-peak hour inspections conducted in
conjunction with the program.
-5376-
EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE, 9/13/02, PAGE 2
Suerth discussed the possible need to better monitor for veligers at commercial facilities and public
accesses on Lake Minnetonka,
Welli.ng stated that thepilot program being discussed, was. a supplementary program to the mandated
· pib'g~.~ ~!1~t requiJ-~' ~-0un~ 20 000 h0ur~ of'inspeCtiOnS at pL~'~ ic acceSses :byihe MN DNR ar0Undithe
,~:~tat~: o~f~:~innes~tal-primar:iiyat: nfesied ~ate .m. He d sCUsS~d ,the.PrQcedureS'~utiiized by these 'nspectors
during their inspections.
Barren asked if Three Rivers Park Distdct employees staffing the gate at the Lake Minnetonka Regional
Park had been trained this summer to conduct similar inspections.
Welling stated that he would need to check further into this.
The Task Force discussed a number of issues pertaining to this agenda item. Some of them included:
· The need to improve educational efforts and communications with commercial transporting '
companies relating to the spread of zebra mussels and other exotic species,
· The need for the establishment of a database of commercial transporting companies that operate in
the State of Minnesota, noting that District staff had begun the process. There was discussion that
this database could possibly be enhanced in the future, possibly by a MN DNR intern.
· There were few problems associated with the pilot program between the public and the inspectors
at the public accesses.
· There was discussion on preparations that need to begin for this program for the 2003 season.
· There was diScussion on local regatta's held on Lake Minnetonka this past summer and the lack of
coordination with the District staff on the use of the high-pressure sprayer. - '"'"
Nybeck stated that he was currently working with Dick Osgood on the final report of the 2002 pilot project,
noting that it should be finalized in the near future for review by the Task Force.
Aqencv Reports.
Welling provided an overview of the MN DNR cost sharing program, noting a decision was made to reduce
the number of lakes where high-intensity management would take Place, which would include a MN,DNR
survey and possibly a herbicide treatment be a contractor based on the direction from the MN DNR. In the
past, approximately 15 to 20 lakes would fall into this category, with approximately 12 of them having
herbicide treatments. There were approximately six categories that. fell within the high,intensity
management category in 2002. The~majodty of the management conducted by the MN DNR was targeted
at nuisagces, with 9.3 lakes beginning.in the category at the beginning of the year and 99 at the end of the
.year. $,80~000 of funding was made, available to these lakes fpr, cost-:sha~ing pu~oses;., Applications were
received from 30 o[the lakes, with 18 of them approved by the MN.DNR, Complaints received from the
public in 2002 were relatively Iow, noting that they paralleled the feedback received from the public by the
Distdct and Three Rivers Park District,.. There ~were seven new:infestations of bodies of water this year·with
milfOil, which increases the total to 140 in the State of Minnesota.
Barren stated that he had no specific comments on milfoil, other than he was working with the MN DNR and
the City O[ Plymouth on a comprehensive aquatic plant management plan for Medicine Lake. He provided
an overview ofthe components of the management plan, including improved water quality cladty and
streamlining the permit process with the MN DNR on Medicine Lake. He stated that he believed the total
phosphorous levels on Medicine Lake have improved greatly in the past five years with the ban of
phosphorus fertilizers within the City of Plymouth. He discussed possible water quality improvement
~5377-
EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE, 9/13/02, PAGE 3
projects on Lake Minnetonka, specifically Jennings and Halsteads Bays, and the need to address both
external and internal loading.
Vanderbosch stated that he had Observed and received feedback from some residents on Lake Minn, etonka
and. a few other lakes regarding the reduction of the effectiveness' of chemical treatments this Past sbmmer.
He'believed that,the high lake level conditions and operator error could have contributed to this. "~
Area wide lake association reports,
There were no area wide lake association reports,
Old business.
There was no old business.
New business.
There was no new business,
Adjournment.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:15 a.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Greg Nybeck
Executive Director
-5378-
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MOUND POLIC
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Telephone 472-0621
Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
Kandis Hanson
Acting Chief John McKinley
Monthly Report for November, 2002
STATISTICS
The during the month
of N( Them were 3
thefts reported.
There were 58 Part II offenses .r~;rted~i Those', offenses include 5
criminal damagc~toproperty;~ 3.:nar.~ics, ~ liquor'"law violations, 6 DUI,
21 domestics (17 with assaultsjl mid 12 other offenses.
The
Parking
issued to 7.2 individuals for a varie~,.of violations.
3 juvenile citations.
Warnings were
There was 3'adults arrested' for felony l~el viOlations'. Them 29 adults and
5 juvenilesarrested.for:~Sdemcanors'::'~e were.additional 5
misdemeaiaOrid~l ~ ~a~nt ~estS~!~
The
medical
agencies
There were 20
assisted other
assistance on 11
-5379-
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - November, 2002
II. INVESTIGATIONS
Investigations were conducted on 2 criminal sexual conduct cases, 3
burglaries, identity theft case and 5 child protection cases. Other cases
investigated included thefts, forgery, stolen vehicle, assaults, fleeing the
police in a stolen motor vehicle and recovery of that stolen vehicle,
receiving stolen property, domestic assault and vehicle theft.
Formal complaints were issued for Gross Misdemeanor Domestic Assault,
Disorderly Conduct, 2na Degree Assault, Terroristic Threats, Receiving
Stolen Property, Gross Misdemeanor Theft by Trick, Gross Misdemeanor
Forgery, Possession of Small Amount of Marijuana in a Motor Vehicle,
Possession of Drug Paraphernalia.
III. PERSONNEL/STAFFING
Officers used approximately 41.5 hours of overtime during the month of
November. Officers used 66 hours of comp-time, 5 hours of sick time, and
34.5 hours of vacation. Officers earned 22.25 hours of comp time. Zach
Petz was sworn in as the newest police officer for the city of Mound. He
began his field training by helping and observing Investigator Swanson.
He now is working with Officer Ken Beck who is trained as a field
training officer.
IV. TRAINING
The entire department attended a full day of training in the new 800MHZ
radio system. The system was implemented for Mound around mid
November. There was also a department shoot in November which was
attended by all licensed officers.
V. COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
Mike Woken is doing an exceptional job so far as our new Community
Service Officer. Mike, as a past K-9 Officer for the Department of
Corrections, comes to us with a wealth of knowledge in areas vital to his
position.
-5380-
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - November, 2002
VI. RESERVES
The reserves donated over 115 hours to the community in November. The
unit currently has nine active who contribute on a regular basis.
-5381 -
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
NOVEMBER 2002
OFFENSES CLEA~ED EXCEPT- CLEARED BY ARIES TED
REPORTED UNFOUNDED CLEARED ARREST ADULT JUV
Homicide
Criminal Sexual Conduct
Robbery
Aggravated Assault
Burglary
Larceny
Vehicle Theft
Arson
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 2 2 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
13 2 i I 1 0
3 0 i 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL
Child Abuse/Neglect
Forgery/NSF Checks
Criminal Damage to Property
Weapons
Narcotic Laws
Liquor Laws
DWI
Simple ~sault
Domestic Assault
Domestic (No Assault)
Harassment
Juvenile Status Offenses
Public Peace
Trespassing
Ail Other Offenses
20 2 2 3 3 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 1 0 0 0
1 0 1 0 0 0
3 0 0 3 4 0
7 0 0 6 8 0
6 0 0 6 6 0
3 0 1 1 0 1
17 0 3 12 10 2
4 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 2 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 0 1
5 0 1 2 1 1
1 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 0 0 0 0
TOTAL
58 I 9 31 29 5
PART II & PART IV
Property Damage Accidents
Personal Injury Accidents
Fatal Accidents
Medicals
Animal Complaints
Mutual Aid
Other General Investigations
TOTAL
8
0
0
2O
40
12
406
486
HCCP
Inspections
2
48
TOTAL
614
11
34
32
-5382-
MOIIRD POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT NOVEMBER 2002
GENERAL ACTIVITY SU~Y
Hazardous Citations
Non-Hazardous Citations
Hazardous Warnings
Non-Hazardous Warnings
Verbal Warnings
Parking Citations
DWI
Over .10
Property Damage Accidents
Personal Injury Accidents
Fatal Accidents
Adult Felony Arrests
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests
Juvenile Felony Arrests
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests
Part I Offenses
Part II Offenses
Medicals
Animal Complaints
Ordinance Violations
Other Public Contacts
THIS YEAR TO LAST YEAR
MONTH DATE TO DATE
50 614 603
22 340 428
11 36 145
27 223 440
95 823 799
9 201 475
6 54 56
4 42 53
8 111 95
0 32 19
0 0 0
3 33 25
34 283 324
0 10 24
5 105 167
20 269 396
58 607 756
20 280 319
40 377 575
48 332 401
406 4,677 6,099
TOTAL
Assists
Follow-Ups
HCCP
Mutual Aid Given
Mutal Aid Requested
866 9,449 12,199
52 412 461
19 166 588
2 27 29
12 148 141
11 58 57
-5383-
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
NOVEMBER 2002
CITATIONS
DWI
More Than .10% BAC
Careless/Reckless Driving
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speeding
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired or No Plates
Stop Arm Violations
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving the Scene
No Insurance
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog Ordinances
Code Enforcement
Seat Belt
Overweight Vehicles
Miscellaneous Tags
TOTAL
ADULT
6
4
0
9
0
41
3
0
~'-' 12
1
1
0
4
0
4
0
0
7
1
2
1
2
0
3
101
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
-5384-
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
NOVEMBER 2002
Insurance
Traffic
Equipment
Crosswalk
Animals
Trash/Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
Trespassing
Window Tint
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
WAR]LANT ARRESTS
Felony
Misdemeanor
Adul~
17
9
3
0
3
19
0
0
0
19
7O
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-5385-
Property Value Report
~ Class
Cla~s Extension
Mound Police
Incldent. DateReported Between 10/26/02 11/2S/02
Casel'roperty. RecordType ~ual STOLEN
A - Motor Vehicles
Unknown
TOTAL: A - Motor Vehicles
Tuesday, December 03, 2002
Record Type Items Dollar Value
Stolen
2 16,000.00
2 16,000.00
B - Bicycles
Unknown
TOTAL: B - Bicycles
Stolen
2 190.00
2 190.00
E - Consumer Items
Cigarettes
TOTAL: E - Consumer Items
Stolen
1 1.00
I 1.00
Q - Motorcycles
Unknown
TOTAL: Q - Motorcycles
Stolen
T - Currency, Negotiable bonds
Unknown
TOTAL: T - Currency, Negotiable bonds
Stolen
1 1,000.00
1 1,000.00
1 100.00
1 100.00
X - Equipment/tools
Paint Sprayer
Tool
Tools
TOTAL: X - Equipment/tools
Y - All Other
HaIR COLOR
INVERTER
TOTAL: Y - All Other
Stolen 1 1,800.00
Stolen 1 1,876.00
Stolen 1 360.00
3 4,036.00
Stolen 1 5.00
Stolen 1 1,500.00
2 1,505.00
OVERALL TOTAL...
12 22,832.00
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 1
-5386-
Property Value Report
Property Class
Class Extension
Mound Police
Incident. DateReported Between 10/26/02 11/25/02
CaseProperty. RecordType Equal RECOVERED
Tuesday, December 03, 2002
Record Type Items Dollar Value
A - Motor Vehicles
Unknown
TOTAL: A - Motor Vehicles
Recovered
2 16,000.00
2 16,000.00
B - Bicycles
Unknown
TOTAL: B - Bicycles
Recovered
1 100.00
1 100.00
Y - All Other
HaIR COLOR
TOTAL: Y - All Other
Recovered
1 5.00
1 5.00
OVERALL TOTAL...
16,105.00
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: I
-5387-
Mound Police
Incident. DateReported Between 10/26/02 11/25/02
Offense. OffenseCode Greater Than or Equal A0000
Case Status Report
Un- Except- Cleared Pending/ Total
Total Founded Cleared Arrest Inactive Cleared
Tuesday, December 03, 2002
Ref. To GOA Assisted
Otb. Agen /UTL /Advised Other
A2513 ASLT 2-FE-THRT INFL BOD HRM-POS FIREARM-AD STR
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
A5355 ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
A5502 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-NO WEAP-ADLT-ACQ
1 0 1 0 0 I
percent 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00 100.00
A5533 ASLT 5-MS-THREATEN HARM-KNIFE-ADLT STR
I 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
A9502 TERR THREATS-INFLT BH-UNK WEAP-ADLT-ACQ
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
A9503
TERRTHREATS-INFLT BH-UNKWEAP-ADULT-STR
1 0 0 1 0 1
00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
[ DOM ASLT-GM-INFLT BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-AD-FAM
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 I00.00
AK352 ASLT-DOMESTIC-GM-INFLT BODLY HRM-HNDS-ADLT-ACQ
1 0 1 0 0 1
percent 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00 100.00
AL351 DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM
9 0 0 9 0 9
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
AL352 ASLT-DOMESTIC-MS-INFLT BODLY HRM-HNDS-ADLT-AC
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
AL354 DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-CH-FAM
4 0 2 0 2 2
percent 00.00 50.00 00.00 50.00 50.00
AL451 DOM ASLT-MS-FEAR BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM
1 0 0 1 0 , 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
B3764 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 ' 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00,00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 1
-5388-
Mound Police
Incident. DateReported Between 10/26/02 11/25/02
Offense. OffenseCode Greater Than or Equal A0000
Case Status Report
Un- Except- Cleared Pending/ Total
MOC Total Founded Cleared Arrest lnnctive Cleared
Tuesday, December 03, 2002
Ref. To GOA Assisted
Oth. Agen /UTL /Advised Other
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 I00.00 00.00
D8540 DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSESSION
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
DA540 ' DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARIJ-UNK
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
DC500 DRUGS-DRUG PARAPH-POSSESS-UNK-UNK
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
E2700 ESC-FE-FLEE AN OFFICER
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
JE501 TRAF-AC-GM-2ND DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
JEF01 TRAF-AC-GM-2ND DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
JF501 TRAF-AC-GM-3RD DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV
4 0 0 4 0 4
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
JFF01 TRAF-AC-GM-3RD DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV
2 0 0 2 0 2
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
JFR01 TRAF-AC-GM-3RD DEG DWI-REFUSAL TO TEST-MV
1 0 0 1 0 1
percem 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
JG501 TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
JGF01 TRAF-ACC-M4TH DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
~M4113 LIQSOR-MS~MINOR PURCHASE ORoATTMPT TO1 PURCHASE0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 2
-5389-
Mound Police
Incident. DateReported Between 10/26/02 11/25/02
Offense. OffenseCode Greater Than or Equal A0000
Case Status Report
Un- Except- Cleared Pending/ Total Ref. To
Total Founded Cleared Arrest Inactive Cleared 0th. ARen
M4140 LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21
1 0 0 1 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
M5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY
1 0 0 1 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT
3 0 1 2 0 3 0
percent 00.00 33.33 66.67 00.00 100.00 00.00
N3190 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
3 0 2 0 1 2 0
percent 00.00 66.67 00.00 33.33 66.67 00.00
N3230 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARASS-ABUSE-THRT-MAIL-DELIV
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00
Tuesday, December 03, 2002
GOA Assisted
/UTL /Advised Other
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00,00 00.00 00.00
N3370 MS-VIOL ORDER FOR PROTECTION
1 I 0 0 0 0
percent 100.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
?3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
5 0 1 0 4 1
percent 00.00 20.00 00.00 80.00 20.00
P3310 TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
TC159 THEFT-501-2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
2 0 0 0 2 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
TR029 THEFT-250 OR LESS-MS-BUILDING-OTHER PROP
1 1 0 0 0 0
percent 100.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
TR099 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP
1 0 1 0 0 1
percent 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00 100.00
TR159 THEFT-LESS 250-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
U1063 THEFT-FE-BY SWINDLE-TRICK-501-2500
1 1 0 0 0 0
percent 100.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 3
-5390-
Mound Police
Incident. DateReported Between 10/26/02 11/25/02
Offense. OffenseCode Greater Than or Equal A0000
Case Status Report
Un- Except- Cleared pending/ Total Ref. To
MOC Total Founded Cleared Arrest Inactive Cleared Otb. Agen
U1553 FRAUD-FE-FIN-TRAN-CARD-NO CONSENT 501-2500
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
U1732 THEFT-FE-IDENTITY THEFT-2501-19999
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
U206C THEFT-GM-BY SWINDLE OR TRICK-251-500
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
U3200 COMPUTER CRIM-MS-FRAUD ACT-UNK LOSS
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
U328D THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-250 OR LESS
1 0 0 1 0 1
percent 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00 100.00
U349D THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 OR LESS
2 0 0 0 2 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00,00
V0021 VEH THEFT-UNK LVL VAL-AUTO
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
VA021 THEFT-FE-AUTO-MORE THAN 2500
1 0 1 0 0 1
percent 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00 100.00
VB026 VEH-501-2500-FE-TH~FT-MOTORIZED BICYCLE
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
W31J9 WEAPONS-MS-OPER-BB GUN-OTHER
1 0 1 0 0 1
percent 00.00 100.00 00.00 00.00 100.00
Y3160 CRIM AGNST GOVN-MS-1MPERSONATING AN OFFICER
1 0 0 0 1 0
percent 00.00 00.00 00.00 100.00 00.00
Tuesday, December 03, 2002
GOA Assisted
/UTL /Advised Other
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
TOTAL
74 3 11 34 26 45
percent 04.05 14.86 45.95 35.14 -, 60.81
0 0 0 0
00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 4
-5391 -
Crime ~ummary Report
MOC
Mound Police
Incident. DateReported Between 10/26/02 11/25/02
Total
Tuesday, December 03, 2002
MOC Literal Translation
9000
9002
9005
9018
9038
9200
9210
9220
9240
9253
9312
9313
9315
9316
9450
9451
9566
9710
9720
9730
9732
9741
9750
9800
9801
2
2
1
4
1
9
3
4
1
1
1
9
1
3
7
1
2
2
1
16
1
7
2
8
4
SPEEDING
NO D/L, EXPIll.ED D/L
J-RESTRICTED D/L
EQUIPMENT VIOLATION
MISC CITATIONS/TRAFFIC
DAS/DAR/DAC
PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED
NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF
CHANGE OF DOMICILE
STOP ARM VIOLATION/NO TICKET
FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS
FOUND PROPERTY
UNCLAIME DESTROYED ANIMALS
IMPOUNDED PLATES
PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS
H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC.
ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS
MEDICAL/ASU
MEDICAL/DOA
MEDICALS
MEDICALS/CI
911 HANG UPS
FIRES
ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED
DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 1
-5392-
Crime Summary Report
MOC
Mound Police
Incident. DateReported Between 10/26/02 11/25/02
Total
Tuesday, December 03, 2002
MOC Literal Translation
9802
9804
9812
9900
9904
9910
9921
9928
'9930
9932
9944
9945
9950
9951
9980
9992
9994
A2513
A5355
A5502
A5533
A9502
A9503
AK331
AK352
AL351
AL352
4
5
1
2
24
3
1
2
9
4
1
2
1
3
5
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
1
PUBLIC ASSIST
NOISE COMPLAINT
TRESPASS NOTIFICATION LT
ALL HCCP CASES
OPEN DOOR/ALARMS
MISC. SERVICES BY OFFICERS
INSPECTIONS CITATION
HANDGUN CARRY GRANTED
HANDGUN PURCHASE GRANTED
OFP VIO. CRIME CONTROL & LAW ENF
UNWANTED GUEST
SUSPICIOUS PERSON
INFO/INT
SEX OFFENDERS
WARRANTS
MUTUAL AID/8100
MUTUAL AID/ALL OTHER
ASLT 2-FE-THRT IN-FL BOD HRM-POS FIREARM-AD STR
ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ
ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-NO WEAP-ADLT-ACQ
ASLT 5-MS-THREATEN HARM-KNIFE-ADLT STR
TERR THREATS-INFLT BH-UNK WEAP-ADLT-ACQ
TERR THREATS-INFLT BH-UNK WEAP-ADULT-STR
DOM ASLT-GM-INFLT BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-AD-FAM
ASLT-DOMESTIC-GM-INFLT BODLY HRM-HNDS-ADLT-ACQ
·
DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM
ASLT-DOMESTIC-MS-INFLT BODLY HRM-HNDS-ADLT-AC
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 2
-5393-
Crime Summary Report
MOC
Mound Police
Incident. DateReported Between 10/26/02 11/25/02
Total
Tuesday, December 03, 2002
M0C Literal Translation
AL354
AL451
B3764
D$540
DA540
DC500
E2700
JE501
JEF01
JF501
JFF01
JFR01
JG501
JGF01
M4113
M4140
M5350
N3030
N3190
N3230
N3370
P3110
P3310
TC159
TR029
TR099
TR159
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
5
1
2
1
1
1
DOM ASLT-MS-INFLT BODILY HARM-HANDS-CH-FAM
DOM ASLT-MS-FEAR BODILY HARM-HANDS-AD-FAM
BURG 3-UNOCC N'RES FRC-N-UNK XVEAP-COM TI-IEFT
DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSESSION
DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARM-UNK
DRUGS-DRUG PARAPH-POS SES S-UNK-UNK
ESC-FE-FLEE AN OFFICER
TRAF-AC-GM-2ND DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV
TRAF-AC-GM-2ND DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV
TRAF-AC-GM-3RD DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MV
TKAF-AC-GM-3RD DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV
TRAF-AC-GM-3RD DEG DWI-REFUSAL TO TEST-MY
TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG DWI-UI ALCOHOL-MY
TRAF-ACC-M-4TH DEG DWI-10 OR MORE WIN 2 HRS-MV
LIQUOR-MS-MINOR PURCHASE OR ATTMPT TO PURCHASE
LIQUOR-UNDERAGE CONSUMPTION 18-21
YUVENILE-RUNAWAY
DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT
DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARAS S-ABUSE-THRT-MAIL-DELIV
MS-VIOL ORDER FOR PROTECTION
PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
THEFT-501-2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
THEFT-250 OR LESS-MS-BUILDING-OTHER PROP
THEFT-LESS 250-MS-SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP
THEFT-LESS 250-MS-MOTOR VEH-OTHER
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 3
-5394-
Crime Summary Report
MOC
Mound Police
Incident. DateReported Between 10/26/02 11/25/02
Total
Tuesday, December 03, 2002
MOC Literal Transln__tlon
GRAND TOTAL:
UI063
U1553
U1732
U206C
U3200
U328D
U349D
V0021
VA021
VB026
W31 J9
Y3160
1
1.
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
248
THEFT-FE-BY SWINDLE-TRICK-501-2500
FRAUD-FE-FIN-TRAN-CARD-NO CONSENT 501-2500
THEFT-FE-IDENTITY THEFT-2501-19999
THEFT-GM-BY SWINDLE OR TRICK-251-500
COMPUTER CRIM-MS-FRAUD ACT-UNK LOSS
THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-250 OR LESS
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-250 OR LESS
VEH THEFT-I.INK LVL VAL-AUTO
THEFT-FE-AUTO-MORE THAN 2500
VEH-501-2500-FE-THEFT-MOTORIZED BICYCLE
WEAPONS-MS-OPER-BB GUN-OTHER
CRIM AGNST GOVN-MS-IMPERSONATING AN OFFICER
Licensed to Mound Police Department
Page: 4
-5395-
Citst|on Summary Report
MOC
Mound Police
Citation. DateCited Between 10/26/02 11/25/02
Literal Translation
Tuesday, December 03, 200~2
9000
39 SPEEDING
9001
2 J-SPEEDING
9O02
NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L
9014
1 STOP SIGN
9030
CROSSWALK VIOLATION
9040
2 NO SEATBELT
9100
PARKING/ALL OTHER
9210
PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED
GRAND TOTAL...
62
Licensed to Mound Police Departmem
Page: 1
-5396-
-5397-
rtl
oo o gg
_.
o o oo o o o o oo
000000000
O000000C~
oooooooooo
oo o oo o o o o o
oo o oo o o o o o
oo~ooooo
ooooooooo
000000
~gggo o o ~gg
~00~0000~
m
ITl
-5398-
00~0~
oo88oo~o~8
0 0
~0
0
0
~0
-5399-
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
2002
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Telephone 472-0621
Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
OPERATION CLEAN SWEEP
Results as of November 25, 2002
Grid 10
Number of violations
Resolved by warning
Resolved by citation
Still open
Grid 20
Number of violations
Resolved by warning
Resolved by citation
Still open
Grid 30
Number of violations
Resolved by warning
Resolved by citation
Still open
Grid 4O
Number of violations
Resolved by warning
Resolved by citation
Still open
Grid 50
Number of violations
Resolved by warning
l~esoived by citation
Still open
2002 Totals
Number of violations
Resolved by warning
Resolved by citation
Still open
37
29
5
26
21
3
2
82
69
5
8
23
22
1
0
13
263
210
25
8
-5400-
THE GILLESPIE CENTER
2590 COMMERCE BOULEVARD - MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
November 22~, 2002
Dear Members and Special Friends,
We are very pleased to announce thanks to our members, our wonderful community (and most
especially the Gillespie Family Fund) we were able to celebrate our first anniversary of the Gillespie Center
this July. We all now can feel the pride of a job well done. This goal was achieved because of civic groups,
veteran organizations, churches, school staff and students, local businesses, cities and community members
of all ages and, most especially, our own membership. The Gillespie Center is a shining example of''what a
community can do" and will long serve as a model to the future generations.
During the past year the Center has been a busy meeting place for weddings, family and civic
gatherings, conferences, classes, seminars and other community events. However, it most visibly serves as
the focal point of the senior citizens services for the area~ During the past year we served 1,892 elderly by
providing:
17,140 rides to seniors with our Dial, a-Ride transportation system
· 12,896 nutritional meals in our Senior Dining program
· 452 educational and recreational events
· Information and referral services
· Volunteer and leadership opportunities for 258 seniors
· Conn.qeling and case management for frail elderly to help them maintain
their independence in the community
The Gillespie Center is owned and operated by The Gillespie Center Foundation and its members and
with the help of our own fundraising efforts combined with rental income the building will be maintained
and cared for in a prudent manner. Most of the fundraising is done with dinners, raffles, boutiques, sales,
and direct appeal. This Annual Appeal is one of the most important ways that our entire community can help
out. Our goal is to raise $50,000 this year to pay for all of the utilities, insurance and maintenance of the
building. We hope that you can find it in your hearts and fm_a_~ces this year to contribute to this worthy
cau,seo
If you would like to give a holiday gift in honor of someone or as a memorial, please indicate on the
form and we would be most happy to send them an acknowledgment. Check with your family or friends to
see about matching funds from their employers.
We would like to especially thank all of you as members for all the hard work that you do in helping
with our fundraising efforts and sharing with us in the pride of The Gillespie Center. We keep growing and
growing and hope that we will meet the needs of all of senior citizens now and in the future. Thank you for
reading this appeal letter and we hope you will consider us in your donation plans. Happy holidays to you
and your family!
Sharon McMenamy Cook Jack Weist
President, Westonka Senior Citizens Foundation Chair, Gillespie Center Advisory Council
Owned and Operated by Westonka Senior Citizens Foundation
Phone: 952-472-65~54~Olr-~x: 952-472-6505
The Gffiespie Gazette
VOI~ X 1%10 lg
l)eeember - gOOg
PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE
November 20, 2002
Dear Members and Friends,
Th!s Is my last message for the year, and I wonder where the year has gone. I have been retired for
more than six years, and I can't believe it has been that long. The time has passed so quickly. Sometimes I
think of that time and all the thlngs I could have done, and didn't get done.
You have elected a new Advisory Council for 2003.' Those chosen were Madlyn Byrnes, Barb Calhoun,
Gerry Dodds, Mar~y Garvais, Connie Hanley, 9ue Matachek, Dana McCarvllle, Dotty O'Brlen, Gene Par~yka, Don
Pedersen, Marion Poteete, Mary Ellen Storlien, Margaret Thorne, Pat Wallin and Jack Weist. We thank the
other candidates and hope you will continue to help our Center in 2003. This is our Center. We have more than
850 members. We have programs for everyone. We have many opporl~nitles to help others. We have a
beautiful Center where we can enjoy friends, and make new ones. .-
For many years, our members have done mailings for businesses, our school district, cities, civic groups
~nd our own Center. For most of these mailings, Betty Strong has been the person in charge, getting the help,
things set up, and making, sure the job gets done right. This Is not always an easy task. Some of
these mailings earn money to help suppor~ our Center. A blg ~Thank You" to Betty for all she does and thanks
to all the wonderful people who come and help with these mailings.
As the year winds down to a close, I would be remiss if I did not thank the two people most responsible
for our success as a Center. While we are a center for seniors, and we truly love all our seniors, we are a
community center looking to help all of our community. We are really blessed to have Cathy Bailey as our
Director and Linda Dynan as the Assistant Director/Rental Coordlnaton My praise would not even touch the
surface of what these two beautiful people do for our Center and all of us members. Our heartfelt thanks to
Cathy and Llnda for all you do for all of us. We can't thank you enough.
Year 2002 Is coming to a close, 2003 on the near horizon. Our beautiful Holiday Boutique Is here,
opening on Sunday, December 1~ through December 15~. This is a delightful event and many people say this is
the best they have attended. We will have a New Yea?s celebration here at our Center on Saturday, January
4~. We will have a pdme db dtnner, with wine tasting, and entertainment by the Golden Strings. We can only
conveniently accommodate a limited number, so get your reservations made soon. The cost will be $2/~ and we
will reserve tables if you want to find a group to bring.
We hope 2002 has been a good year for you and your family. We wish the best for you in 2003.
Personally, I pray for peace in our world.
J~~~ack Wels~ Chairperson
Gillesple Center Advisory Council
-5402-
Enolo~,ed i~ my ghfl; of $.,
Co,l;ributio. Level~:
,.. Pa'~ronm ($100 -
__. Supporter~ ($=5o - ~}
... Ben~m (~500 - ~999)
... Endowmen~ (~1000 - ~5000)
Mail ~: THE GILLE~PIE CEN~E
2590 Comme~oe Boul~a~
Mound, Minneeo~
We are a non-profit 501 (o)5 organization.
to the We~tonka ~enior Cltizen~ Foundation (The GilleeF)ie Cerrr, er)
Name:
Addreee:
I would like my gi~ to be given lin:
..... honor of
~ memor~ of
?{eame mend an aoknowledgment to:
My Employer will match my gift; ,.,
Donati°ne are 100% ~ax deduc:'r, ible (Tax I D # 411(~179~)
-5403-
Metropolitan Council
Building communities that work
December 4, 2002
Sara Irvine, City Administrator
City of Minnetonka Beach
2945 Westwood Road
PO Box 146
Minnetonka Beach, MN 55361
City of Minnetonka Beach Comprehensive Plan Update
MetropOlitan Council District 3
Metropolitan Council Referra! File. No. 18600,l
Dear Ms, Irvine:
The purpose of this letter is to confirm recent communications between the City of Minnetonka Beach
and the Metropolitan Council regarding the plan review process, and .the current City Council's proposed
agenda to take final action to adopt and implement the comprehensive plan at its December 9, 2002
meeting.
Please be advised that the Metropolitan Council has not yet completed its formal review of the plan.
Minnesota Statutes Section 473.175, Subdivision 2 says in part:
No action shall be taken by any local governmental unit...to place any such comprehensive
plan...into effect until the [Metropolitan] Council has returned the statement to the unit and until
the local government unit has incorporated any modifications in the plan required by a final
decision, order or judgement pursuant to section 473.866.
Minnesota Statutes Section 473.175, Subdivision 2 also says in part:
Within 120 days following receipt of a comprehensive p!a~n of a local governmental unit, unless a
time extension is mutually agreed to, the [MeWopolitan] Council shall return, to the local
governmental unit a statement containing its comments and, by resolution, i~ decision, if any, to
require modifications to assure conformance with the metrop01i ~tao~. system plans.
Metropolitan Council records indicate that the Metropolitan Council receivedthe.Cit.y?s.comprehensive ......
plan on August 9, 2001. Metropolitan Council stafffound the comprehensive plan. incomplete: for review
purposes at that time and the review was suspended. Following a submittal received by the. Metropolitan
Council on July 18, 2002, Metropolitan Council staff found the City's c0mprehensive.plan submittal
complete for review and the Metropolitan Council's formal review commenced..
In a letter dated July 31, 2002, sent by Phyllis Hanson, Man~ger'_0fthe Council's Qffice..ofPlanning and..
Technical Assistance, the City was notified that the Metropr>litan Council expected, tocomplete its. review ...........
by November 15, 2002, which is 120 days from July 18, 2'002..
On September 23, 2002, the Metropolitan Council received a faxed copy of a letter from Minnetonka
Beach Planner and Zoning Administrator, Richard Krier, requesting an extension to the review period
from 120 to 180-days to allow additional time to resolve the County Road designation and regional trail
identification issues. The letter noted that the 180-day review period extends to January. 1.4, 2003 ....
www.metrocouncil.org
Metro Info Line 602} 1888
230 East Fifth Street
· St. Paul. Minnesota55101-1626 * i651)602:1000
,~,, ~- 5404-, ~,~,o~
* Fax 602-1550
· TTY291-0904
Sara Irvine, City Administrator
December 4, 2002
Page 2
The Metropolitan Council has scheduled the Minnetonka Beach comprehensive plan review for public
hearing before its Livable Communities Committee on Monday, January 6, 2003 and action by the full
Metropolitan Council on January 8, 2003. Both dates are within the 180-day extended, rewiew period
requested by the City.
The Metropolitan Council staff review report finds that the plan is generally.acceptable, except with
respect to the proposed regional trail. We believe that the need for, and Minnetonka Beach's cooperation
in incorporating the regional trail intO' its ]51hri, is a matter:0f regional importance. I Would encourage, the
current City Council to consider removing the proposed final adoption action from its December 9, 2002
agenda to allow regional stakeholders the opportunity'to expres§ their comments and insteadadopt a
resolution requesting a further 30 day extension of the review period. This also would allow the newly
elected City Council the opportunity to consider the matter before the Metropolitan Council takes action
on the plan.
StaffWill.be forwarding a copy of~he rev'ised 'gtaffreport by December 16, 2002. If:y0u have~ any
questiOns ConCerning the above noted stattito~· ~:itations, please contact David Theisen, OffiCe of General
Counsel at 651-602-1706, If you have any questions about the plan review process and the staff review
report please contact Robin Caufman, AICP, Senior Planner and Principal Reviewer, at 651-602-1457.
Sincerely,
CC:
David Bergerson, Minnetonka Beach City Council
John Bre6n, Minnetonka BeaCh City C0uheil
James Gas6h, Minnetonka;Beach Cit~ C0~ficil, MayOr Elect
Nell E. Mathews, Mi~e~6nlca Beach City Council
Joann Ander~on', Mi~netonka Beach City CoUncil EleCt
Jack Foss, Minnetonka Beach City Council Elect
Se'flator ~ OliVer, District 43'
Ryresent~ii!iVe Tom 'Woi:kman, DiStriCt 43 A'
Senator ElEct' Gen ~0lsOri, D~iStrict 33~'
Representative Elec~"Barb sYkora, District 33A
Richard Krier, MidWest Planning
Ronald Moorse,i Orono City Administrator
Dean: Lotter;~Mi[iheti'lsta; City Ad~ihis~f/it0r
William Weeks, Spring Park City Administr/itor
Brenda Fisk, St. Bonifacius City Clerk
J6hn ~GunyoU.; ;Minn~tonka City' Manager
Susan Arntz, Wac~niii City'.AdminiSfratov
Al Orsen;"Wayzata City Administrator
MarSh Wiida, Hennepin COunty Rail Authority
-54O5-
Sara lrvine, City Administrator
December 4, 2002
Page 3
Dave Drealan, Carver County Planning Director
Mary Hill Smith, Metropolitan Council District 3
Jules Smith, Metropolitan Council District 4
Douglas Bryant, Superintendent Three Rivers Park District
David Engstom, Chair Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission
Phyllis Hanson, Manager, Planning and Technical Assistance
Arne Stefferud, Planning Analyst, Regional Parks/Planning and Growth Management Department
Robin Caufman, AICP, Principal Reviewer, Office of Planning and Technical Assistance
-5406-
6512240555
BOLTT CORPORATION
CommerCial and F~e$idential
Contractors and Developers
509 Sibley Street Suite 400
St. Paul, Minnesota 5510f
Telephone; 651.224-0015 Pax: ~51.224-0355
04 November 2002
Via Fax
Hard Copy to Follow
Brian Pellowski
PBK Investments
4969 Olson Memorial Highway
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
Re: Turnover of Mound Marketplace-Mound Liquor Store (Harbor Wine and Spirits)
Dear Brian:
Per the letter we received from Vern Hanson dated 28 October 2002 and after conferring
with Steve Parks the reasons for the delay in turning over the liquor store are as follows:
1. We received final drawings from Tushie/Montgomery in late September, which showed
significant changes in design and finishes. With that we had to re-price products,
materials and labor. This resulted in a meeting the second week of October with Candice
Hanson to define budget issues.
2. Subsequent to that meeting we were able to place orders On the 15t~ of October, which
required an average of 4 weeks, lead-time. We will begin to see deliveries starting
November 11 ~.
In view of the above Mr. Parks expects to turn over the liquor store on or before November
27, 2002.
Call with any questions.
Lar~ Olson
~ OOl
-5407-
November 5, 2002
Kandis Hansen
Mound City Manager
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Km~dis:
Enclosed please find a letter from Boltt Corporation, our General Contractor,
regarding the turnover of the Liquor Store. As you can see, the coolers etc. are a
problem from a scheduling standpoint.
Please let me know what your thoughts and intentions are. I look forward to the
opening of your store.
Sincerely,
Brian Pellowski
cc: Veto Hanson
4969 Olson Memorial Hwy
Golden Valley
Minnesota
55422
Phone
763-545-1672
Fax
763-545-1697
E-mail
pbkinvest@aol.com
-5408-
CITY OF MOUND
November 7, 2002
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1587
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound.com
Brim Pellowski
PBK Investments, Inc.
4969 Olson Memorial Highway
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
BY MAIL AND FAX
Re: Turnover of Mound Marketplace-Mound Liquor Store.
Dear Mr. Pellowski:
I have received your letter of November 5, 2002 and the enclosure letter from your general
contractor to You. In the enclosure letter, your general contractor indicates that it expects the liquor
store to be turned over to the City on or before November 27, 2002.
I would direct your attention to the Addendum to the Contract for Deed between the City
and Moimd Marketplace, LLC. Paragraph 21(c) reads in relevant part:
"Delivery of Possession Purchaser shall not be required to take possession during the
period November 15, 2002 through February 1, 2003; provided that Purchaser may elect
to take possession during such period, in which event the payment required under
subparagraph 4(c)(iii) of this Contract shall be due .... "
The City of Mound does not elect to take possession during that period. However,
assuming Completion, we do intend to close and take possession upon the expiration of the
referenced period.
If you have any.questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Respect.fully yours,
Kandi§ M. Hanson
City Manager
prlnted on recycled paper
-5409-
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Three Hundred Fifty Thousand and no/100 DOllars ($350,000.00) upon
completion of one hundred percent (100%) of the building shell of the
Store.
One Hundred Fifty Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($150,000.00) upon
completion of all tenant improvements and issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for the Store (hereinafter referred to as "Completion").
One Hundred Seventy Five Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($175,000.00)
with interest thereon from and after Closing at the rate of eight percent
(8%) per annum due on the later of June 1, 2003 or the date which is six
(6) months after Completion.
The Contract for Deed shall contain the following additional provisions:
(^)
Payment under (i) above shall be subject to a ten percent (10%) retainage
and payment under (ii) above shall be subject to a five percent retainage,
all of which retainage shall be paid with payment under (iii) above, subject
to Buyer's right to withhold for minor, punch list items in an amount equal
to 150% of the estimated cost of correction or completion.
Except as provided in (iv) above, no interest shall accrue under the
Contract for Deed; provided that during such times as Buyer is in default
under the Contract for Deed, interest shall accrue on delinquent amounts at
the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum.
(c)
All requests by Seller for progress payments shall be accompanied by a
certification by Seller's architect (and Buyer's architect, if any) that the
prescribed state of completion has been reached and lien waivers sufficient
to insure Buyer's interests.
(D)
Except as otherwige provided below, Seller shall retain all rights of
possession of the Property and all risk of loss shall be borne by Seller until
Completion, at which -time possession of the Property shall be delivered to
Buyer. During the period of Seller's possession, Seller shall procure both
liability and builders' risk insurance in appropriate amounts naming Buyer
as an additional insured thereunder. ~
LMW-20242! v6
MU200-96
(E)
Seller and Buyer agree that Buyer shall not be required to take possession
during the period November 15, 2002 through February 1, 2003; provided
that Buyer may elect to take possession during such period, in which event
the payment required under subparagraph (iii) shall be due, In the e~ent
that Completion does not occur prior to November i5, 20021 Buyer Shall
n°tbe Obligated t° make the Pa~ni ;~uired ~Y ~hb~a~ph (iii) abOve
until the l~ter °f c°m~ietio~ ;r Febru~;y 1; 2003, Without limiting the
foregoing, in the event that Completion does not occur by February 1, .
2003, Buyer shall have the right to both (1) offset against the all remaining ]
amounts due under the Contract for Deed any Md all documented amounts
incu~ed bY Buyer for occupancy costs (includifig :fen~i feiaiing to Buyer!s [
retaining its current municipal liqu°r st°re in its euffent 16~atl°n (6r a
2
............. -5410-
x45 University Avenue WeSt, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044
Phone: (651) 281-12oo · (80'0) 925.1122
Fax: (651) 281-1298 · TDD (651) 281-129o
www.lmcit.l~c.org
December 2, 2002
To: LMCIT members
From:
RE:
LMCIT
2003 Pr0PertY/Casualtyand WorkerS' c0mp6nsati0'fl rates and dividend
Here's whatLMClT mefnbers will see at their next reneWai~
Premium rate changes
· Municipal liability rates will decrease 8%.
· Auto liability rates will decrease 3%.
· Property rates will increase 10%.
· Excess liabilitY rates will increase 7%.
· Work comp, rates will increase, 10%.
Rates for all other coverages will be unchanged. This includes the machinery
breakdown, liquor liability, airport !iabiliW, bond, open meeting law defense, petrofund.
supplement, and volunteer accidont coverages
The property/casualty rate changes apply to renewals on or after November 15, 2002.
The work comp rate changes apply to renewals in 2003. The property/casualty rate
changes wi!! pretty much offset each other, so most cities should see not much change in
their total property/casualty premium cost.
Dividends
Property/casualty program members will share a $9 million dividend, to be
distributed in mid-December.
The workers compensation program will not return,a dividend this year.
-541i-
What's behind the rate changes?
prOperty/casualty
Ii ~e liability side, loss costs have generally been good for the past few years. Auto
liability losses have also been exceptionally low in the past few years. This year's
actuarial projections are lower than what our actuaries had projected a year ago. That
means that the loss projections we use to set rates are also lower than the projections we
used a year ago, which in turn means lower rates.
While liability loss costs have overall been good, the cost of litigation relating to land use
regulation and to development and redevelopment is significant and continues to be a
concern. We'll be focusing more loss control, efforts on this area in the coming year.
The increases in the property premium rates reflect some Significant increases in
LMCIT's reinsurance costs. Property losses have generally been in line with projections.
Had reinsurance costs not increased, we would have been able to hold these rates
unchanged. The excess liability premium rate increase is also driven by higher
reinsurance costs.
Work comp
Several factors combine to make this year's 10% increase'in Work comp premiums
necessary:
· The State this summer increased the' Special CompensatiOn Fund (SCF)aSsessment
rate from 20% to 30%. That assessment is applied tO paid indemnity benefits. This
factor alone accounts for about 3 % of the 10% .increase.
The rate of inflation N ~ediCal costs is increasing.. In each of the past feW years,
medical costs for work"comp injuries have exceeded· what we'd pr°j~cted when we
set the premium rates for those years. We now estimate that medical costS to'treat
work comp injuries are increasing about 8% per year.
In 2000, the legislature approved increases in the maximum weekly indemnity
benefit, permanent partial disability benefils, and dependents' benefits in fatality
cases. This Was part of the same legislatiSn that transferred $325 million of surplus
funds from the Assigned Risk Plan to the SCF, which allowed the stat~ to then ~educe
the SCF assessment rate from 30% to 20%. The idea was that the 3-4% additional
premium needed to pay for thoSe higher benefits was more than offset bY the~savings
from the SCF rate reduction. Those benefit increases remain in effect, even though
the SCF savings are now gone.
Again this year, in order to minimize the shock to city budgets we've tried to keep the
rate increase as low as possible, while still making sure LMCIT remains financially
2
-5412-
strong. To help minimize the increase, the 2003 rates incorporate virtually no margin. If
the 2003 injuries and claims should mm out to be greater than projected, the excess
would be covered from the program's existing fund balance. Fortunately, that fund
balance is very strong, so that it's feasible to take that risk. But it's likely we'll need to
increase work comp rates further in the future, since we'll need eventually t° get back to
a point where there's some reasonable safety margin built into the rates.
Dividend
Property/casualty program members will share a $9 million dividend this year. This
compares with the $8 million dividend returned in 2001. As in the past, we'll distribute
the dividend in mid-December. The dividend formula will be the same as we've used 'in
the past. That is, each city's share is proportionate to the difference between the city's
total earned premiums and total incurred losses for all years the city has been a member,
with large individual losses capped for purposes of the formula.
This dividend is possible because the property/casualty program again shows very strong
net income for the year. Several factors contributed to that income:
Our premium rates are designed to include a contingency margin, in case losses
should turn out to be greater than projected. If losses are at or below projections, that
margin isn't needed and can be returned as a dividend.
The actuaries this year reduced .their estimates of what incurred losses from previous
years will ultimately cost, compared to what they had estimated a year ago.
Losses incurred during the year were less than what the premium rates were designed
to fund. Most of the difference is in municipal liability and auto liability.
· Earned premiUms'Were higher than we'd projected.
· Capital gains on investments also contributed to this fiscal year's income.
In addition to the dividend, the LMCIT Board also decided to use a part of the year's
income to further strengthen LMCIT's fund balance. While the property/casualty
program is already very strong financially, we anticipate that the reinsurance market will
continue to be difficult for at least the next few years. It may prove to be more
economical in the future to retain a greater amount of risk rather than reinsuring it; and
reinsurance for some risks might in the future not even be available at a reasonable cost.
Having a very strong fund balance gives LMCIT more flexibility to retain greater
amounts of risk in the future if it makes sense to do so.
3
- 5413-