The URL can be used to link to this page

2003-04-22PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 22, 2003 - 7:40 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AGENDA *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the iter~ will be removed from the Consent ~. genda and considered in normal sequence. 1. OPEN MEETING 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE o APPROVE AGENDA, WITH ANY AMENDMENTS *CONSENT AGENDA *A. APPROVE MINUTES: APR 8, 2003 REGULAR MEETING 1585-1588 *B. APPROVE PAYMENT OF CLAIMS 158% 1622 *C. APPROVE PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT: STEPHEN CAMP 1623-1632 3207 DEVON LANE *D. *E. *F. APPROVE EROSION CONTROL AND STORM WATER PERMITS - ZERO GRAVITY SKATE PARK APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST TO WICKENHAUSER'S FOR POST OFFICE DEMOLITION APPROVE RESTAURANT AND AMUSEMENT DEVICES LICENSE RENEWALS 1633-1640 t641-1644 1645 o COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER) DOWNTOWN DESIGN ELEMENTS REVIEW BY BRUCE CHAMBERLAIN OF HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, INC 2002 ASSESSMENT REPORT BY PHIL JENSON, HENNEPIN COUNTY ASSESSOR ACTION ON RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PRE-SALE OF 2003 BONDS, PRESENTED BY JIM PROSSER OF EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES 1646-1647 1648-1651 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 9. ACTION ON AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES 10. CITY MANAGER'S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, WITH ACTION ON RESOLUTION EXTENING CONTRACT AND SETTING SALARY 11. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS mo B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. LMC Friday Fax Minutes: POSAC- Apr 10 Letter: Dreamwood suit plaintiffs Report: Finance Department - Mar 31, 2003 Letter: WAFTA status Letter Northstar Corridor Development Authority Memo: LMC Day at the Capital Correspondence: LMCD Correspondence: Public Safety Facility March/April comparison report: Harbor Wine and Spirits Correspondence: Lake Minnetonka Sun Fest Spring Recycling Day info Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative 12. ADJOURN This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. citvofinound, com. 1652-1659 1660-1674 1675-1683 1684-1685 1686-1687 1688-1690 1691-1692 1693-1696 1697-1698 1699-1727 1728-1730 1731-1732 1733-1736 1737 1738-1740 More current meeting COUNCIL BRIEFING April 22, 2003 pcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Apr 22 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Apr 22 - 7:00 - Police Chief swearing in and reception Apr 22 - 7:40 - CC regular meeting Apr 24 - 8:00 a.m. - Fire Commission meeting (Pat only) May 6 - 6:30 - CC workshop on revenues May 8 - 3:00 - Fire District meeting - Minnetrista (Bob only) May 10 - Police Dpt and City-wide Auction May 13 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting May 13 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting May 17 - Recycling Day May 19 - Chamber of Commerce Ice-Out Open May 20 - 6:30 - HRA workshop - MHR May 27 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting May 27 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting June 2 - DARE Open June 7 - Fire Dept 80th Annual Event Upcoming Absences May 1-2 Kandis Hanson May 7-9 Kandis Hanson 27-30 Kandis Hanson y 3-13 Kandis Hanson Emergency Operations training Cit~ Manager's Conference Moving Vacation HRA #4. Public Safety Facility Project At the most recent HRA meeting, staff was authorized to further explore the potential of purchasing land owned by neighbors of the Public Safety facility, for parking purposes. A cost-benefit analysis has proven the idea to be more costly that would be practical, so the purchase agreement was retracted. Fire Chief Greg Pederson will go into the details. CC #6. Downtown Design Elements Bruce Chamberlain will show actual samples of some of the materials proposed for use in the proposed new downtown. #9. Agreement for Engineering Services To anyone's knowledge here, the City has never had an agreement with MFRA for engineering services. Securing an agreement for services is one of the steps necessary in skirting the proposed legislation that would limit our bonding ability for the County Road 15 realignment project and others--a formality. Other In order to limit the delayed start of the Council Meeting, following the swearing in and any speech making, I would like to form a reception line with Kurtz, the Mayor and City Manager, with Council Members passing through first, and all others to follow. That will enable the Council to partake in refreshments, mingle a bit, and then begin the meeting at 7:40. The Kurtz's have invited a lot of people, and we have invited the public. We will shut all the doors to the council chambers and the reception will continue in the lobby and the conference room. MOUND CITY C'OUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 8, 2003 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, rr{et in regular session on Tuesday, April 8, 2003, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Attorney Paula Caliies, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Engineer John Cameron, Chuck Alcon, Chris Bright,. Dave Hanson, Carol Miletti, Steve Eischens, Sandy Wing, Mark. Thiede, Kevin Sheeley, Ann Eberhart. Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Age~iiii~re considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted b~.:::i~i~ii~)ll'~i~ote. There will be no separate discussion on these items un/essa Counc~ember °~?'"~en so requests, in which eVent the item wi//be removed from the Ce~nt A~enda a~?;~onsidered in 1. OPEN MEETING Mayor Meisel called the meeting to orde~i~{i~ii~ii~::~p.m'i%iii!!iiiii!i!!,~ii=:~ 3. APPROVe AGENDA :i~iiii~iiii!iiiiiiiiii~:~ ........ ~ i:~::~=:~::~::~ .... '?~!!ii Ha~e~i~i,~iibe rei~'~i?~:,ib~!~use this item was moved to the HRA agenda and discussed earlie'~::i;!i~iiit~::eveni~i Brown requested:,~:'i~;ddi[i:~i~ l'::~i~:~i~ii~i::F!ags in Mound MOTION by Osm~?ii?!A~conde~ii~y Hanus to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in faVor. Motion carri~!!;:?:~i;:.;:::::~::::::::::;:?ii? ' 4. CONSENT AGENDA Meisel requested the removal of 4A, Minutes of March 18 and 25, and 4D, Sarenpa Request for Dock at 5446 Bartlett Blvd. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote taken, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Minutes of.April 1,'2003 special meetings (2). B. Approval of Claims in the amount of $152,607.34. C. RESOLUTION NO. 03-35: RESOLUTION CONFIRMING PURCHASE AGREEMENTS, DETERMINING CONFORMITY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND AUTHORIZING SALE AND CONVEYANCE OF CITY LAND 1 - 1585- Mound City Council Minutes - Apdl 8, 2003 D. (removed) E. Approve Transient Merchant License as requested by the Northwest Tonka Lions in order to sell hotdogs, sandwiches and pop at the Music In the Park Activities this summer. F. Approve Public Gathering Permit for the Minnetonka Bass Club to hold their fishing tournament weigh-in at Mound Bay Park on May 31,2003 from 1 1:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 4A. APPROVE MINUTES Meisel stated that she requested the removal of approVal of the minutes of March 18 and 25 because she did not attend those meetings and would abstain from voting. MOTION bY Osmek, seconded by Brown to approve the March 25, 2003 meetings. The following voted in favor Meyer. The following voted against: None. Mayor Motion carried. 4D. REQUEST BY MARTIN SARENPA FOR Meisel stated the minutes from the Dock were sketchy and she Wasn't sure what states that that the property in question previous owners coming to the Council a,, There have also been other' was some filling activity goin(. investigated and the documents that the City ne, weeks. ;s of the March 18 and Hanus, Osmek and from voting. BARTLETT BLVD. this topic was discussed, The current tax statement remembers the sell them the lakeshore. Smith reported that there on this parcel and this is being of a survey and preparing all hould be available in the next few Meisel also Lake Subdivis the covenant issue ants on the property with reference to the Lost illowed regarding not acting on the dock request until MOTION by Osmek, by Hanus to table this item until the possible covenant can be investigated. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 5. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA Kevin Sheeley of 2712 Tyrone Lane appeared before the Council with a petition from residents on Tyrone Lane requesting signs reading "Slow, Speed' Limit 20 mph". They also requested more police patrol and ticketing of violators. He stated that Tyrone Lane is being used as a racetrack and poses great danger for children and pets. Paula Callies informed the Council that special permission is required from the State to reduce speed limits. Discussion followed regarding possible remedies, incl.uding speed bumps, increased patrol, and additional stop signs in the area. It was determined that 2 - 1586- Mound City Council Minutes - April 8, 2003 the Police Department and Public Works would meet and come up with possible remedies for the problem. 6. PUBLIC HEARING - CASE #03-08: CUP FOR ECFE EXPANSION REQUESTED BY WESTONKA SCHOOLS - 522915271 SHORELINE DR. & 2324~2330 WILSHIRE Sarah Smith reviewed the application from Westonka Schools for a conditional use 'permit amendment to expand the Early Childhood Family Education center and also construct a 6362 sq. ft. Learning Center in a portion of the space formerly occu pied by Jubilee Foods. Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 8:35 p.m. ~ ,.~:~ .... -Sandy Wing, Early Childhood Development Coordinatori ~ii~Wed the expansion. No further commenis Were Offered,· and the Mayor c!:~ the'~i~!ii~ .hearing at 8:40 MOTION by'Osmek, seconded by Hanus to ad~i!i~e~i¥~Wing resolution. All voted Jn favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 03-36: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW CHILDHOOD FAMILY EDUCATION (ECFE) ICTION OF A LEARNING CENTER IN SHORELINE PLAZA LOCA~Ei~! SHORELINE DRIVE AND 2324-2330 WlLSHIRE BLVD. p & Z C~E ...... 3-117-24-34-0072 8. WARA REAE:~:i~ATE, i:~iL "::~i~OTT "OLTER PROPERTY, 2241 SOUTHVIEW Chuck Alcon, proj~Manage~[ii~r WARA Developments, presented a sketch plan to the Council for the prop~:~t 22~?'Southview Lane, The sketch shows 14 lots with two cul-de-sacs. No action':~si~}~'ken on this item and a formal plan will be presented at a later d ate. '::~:::~:::::~ · 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION ON ROEGLIN SUIT DISPUTING ASSESSMENT ON WESTEDGE BOULEVARD Paula Callies stated that the Council will be adjourning into closed executive session to discuss client/attorney matters regarding the subject suit. The coUncil went into executive session at 8:50 p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:1.0 p.m., with Callies recapping that the executive session was held to discuss the status of the Roeglin assessment appeal and the Council has decided to proceed with the legal process. 3 - 1587- Mound City Council Minutes - April 8, 2003 10. WELL NO. 8 PROJECT' A. Purchase Aqreement for Land MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to accept the purchase.agreement with Allan A. and Linda A..Moran, for land located at 6139 Evergreen Road, as presented. All voted in favor. Motion Carried. B. Action on Addendum to Purchase Aqreement MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the Addendum to the Purchase Agreement for land located at 6139 Evergreen Road. All voted in favor Motion carried. 11. REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT TO WELFARE REFORM EXECUTIVE POLICY C 0 M M ITT E E ' ' :~,~iiiiiil!? ~Brown, seconded by Hanus not to appoint a to the Welfare Reform Executive Policy Committee at this time. All voted in f~i~::"':='~on carried. ' 11A. FLAG DISPLAY IN THE CITY OF MOUND,~¢¢iiiiii? ..... ~iiiiiili~illii?¢¢i::::,,~. .Brown stated that he received thanks from a ci~'"for ~tting up fi~S in the City in support of our troops in the Iraqi War. He wish~iii~:.B~:~this message on to the Public Works Department. ":'~iiiiiiiii~iiiiiii~:~:i: INFORMATIONIMISCELLANEOI 12. A. LMC Friday Fax B. FYI: Resignation of Officer C. FYI: Resignation of Offi¢ D, Minutes: Planning E. Minutes: Public Safety iect F. FYI: G. Correspondem H. Corres[ i: LMCD I'. LMCC J. Memo: AMM on K. Report: Police Del L. Minutes: MHRthroug K. Minutes: Fire CommiSsion -'Jan 29, 2003 2O03 31,2003 Council redistricting March 2003 )ril 4, 2003 13. ADJOURN MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adjourn at 9:35 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest:. Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 4 - 1588- APRIL 22, 2003 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 040203SUE $3,975.28 APRIL 040903S U E$14,584.16 APRIL 041503SU E $13,382.23 APRIL 042203SUE $352,537.29APRIL TOTAL $384,478.96 - 1589- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/02/03 3:19 PM Page 1 Current Period: April 2003 Batch Name 040203SUE · User Dollar Amt Payments Computer Dollar Amt Refer 40203 AT&T Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 040203 Transaction Date 4/2/2003 $3,975.28 $3,975.28 $0.00 03-03 952-250-0429 Wells Fargo In Balance $41.07 10100 Total $41.07 Refer 40203 LEA GUE OF MINNESOTA CIITES Cash Payment E 101-413'~0-435 Books and Pamphlets DIRECTOR BALANCE DUE $25.56 Invoice 040203 Transaction Date 4/2/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $25.56 Refer 41403 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION 04-01-03 $150.00 Invoice 041403 PO 17683 Transaction Date 4/2/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.00 Refer 40203 SPEEDWA Y SUPERAMERICA (P/W . Cash Payment E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels Invoice 040203 Cash Payment E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels Invoice 040203 Cash Payment E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels Invoice 040203 Transaction Date 4/2/2003 Refer 40203 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (POL . Cash Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor'Fuels Invoice 040203 Transaction Date 4/2/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,606.78 Refer 40203 WIDMER, DENICE Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $184.87 invoice 040203 Transaction Date 4/1/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $184.87 THRU 03-26-03 GASOLINE CHARGES THRU 03-26-03 GASOLINE CHARGES THRU 03-26-03 GASOLINE CHARGES Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,967.00 THRU 03-26-03 GASOLINE CHARGES $1,606.78 $906.05 $823.22 $237.73' - 1590- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/02/03 3:19 PM Page 2 Current Period: April 2003 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $2,764.33 601 WATER FUND $973.22 602 SEWER FUND $237.73 $3,975.28 Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $3,975.28 Total $3,975.28 - 1591 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/11/03 8:13 AM Page 1 Current Period: April 2003 Batch Name 040903SUE User Dollar Amt $14,584.16 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $14,584.16 $0,00 In Balance Refer 40903 EISCHENS, STEVEN AND KARl Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LAND PURCHASE $1,000.00 invoice 040903 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,000.00 Refer 40903 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells 04-03 952-472-0600 $1,045.61 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 03-03 952-472-0635 $354.35 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 03-03 952-472-0635 $354.35 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 03-03 952-472-0635 $354.35 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 03-03 952-472-0621 $836.96 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells 03-03 952-472-0648 $311.81 Invoice 040903 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,257.43 Refer 40903 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 03-18-03 MATS $16.68 Invoice 517204-B Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 03-18-03 MATS $16.68 Invoice 51720;4-B Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 03-18-03 MATS $16.68 Invoice 517204-B Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.04 Refer 40903 GRADY, DANIEL Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $309.23 Invoice 040903 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $309.23 Refer 40903 GRAND, DEB Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $420.00 Invoice 040903 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $420.00 Refer 40903 HANSON, KANDIS Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $1,470.40 Invoice 040903 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,470.40 Refer 40903 MORAN, ALLAN AND LINDA Cash Payment G 601-16100 Fixed Asset-Land EARNEST MONEY,NEW WELL $5,000.00 Invoice 040903 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,000.00 Refer 40903 NEXTEL COMMUN!CA TIONS (FIRE - 1592- CITY 01= MOUND Payments 04/11/03 8;13 AM Page 2 Current.Period: April 2003 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 040903 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Refer 40903 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (PA/V) Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment tnvoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment nvoice 040903 yment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 Cash Payment Invoice 040903 ash Payment Invoice 040903 E 601-.49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 101.-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-03 THRU 03-1§-03 CELL PHONE $153.74 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $153.74 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #23 KESTNER, AL $34.36 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #20 GRADY, DAN $41.28 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #22 HEITZ, DON $34.36 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #18 HARDINA, $34.36 DAMON 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 317 POUNDER, $34.36 CHRIS 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #16 JOHNSON, TIM $34.36 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #19 KIVISTO, SCOTT $35.24 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #21 HEITZ, FRANK $34.36 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 612-221-6740 $19.14 BERENT,BRAIN 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 612-221-6974 $14.97 TAFFE,JOHN 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #07 612-221-6811 $21.25 SKINNER,GREG 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #07 612-221-6811 $21.25 SKINNER, GREG 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #07 612-221-6811 $21.26 SKINNER,GREG 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #15 612-221-6812 $74.75 FACKLER,JIM 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 612-221-6813 $40.27 HOFF,KATIE 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #03 612-221-6814 $34.34 RAHN,JODI 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #02 612-221-6822 $11.45 NELSON,JOYCE 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #02 612-221-6822 $11.45 NELSON,JOYCE - 1593- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/11/03 8:13 AM Page 3 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 #02 612-221-6822 $11.45 NELSON,JOYCE Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 612-221-8385 $34.34 SWARTZER,BRIAN invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 612-292-1182 $34.34 GEISE,LEE Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 612-282-3599 $34.34 ANDERSON,MIKE invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 612-282-5889 $71.51 SIMONEAU,MATT Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 612-363-5883 $29.49 NORLANDER,JILL Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 952-292-1375 WIDMER,DENICE $6.87 invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 952-292-1375 $13.74 WIDMER, DENICE Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 952-292-1375 $13.73 WIDMER, DENICE Invoice 040903 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $802.62 Refer 40903 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-03 THRU 03-18-03 CELL PHONE $447.48 Invoice 040903 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $447.48 Refer 40903 SCHWALBE, SUE Cash Paymenl. G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $375.00 invoice 040903 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $375.00 Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 03-23-03 GASOLINE CHARGE $717.31 Invoice 040903 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $717.31 Refer 40903 VERIZON WIRELESS Cash Payment E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 296-9058 BUSINARO $8.39 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 590-4351 P/W SKINNER $6.95 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 590-4351 P/W SKINNER $6.95 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 590-4351 P/VV SKINNER $6.95 Invoice 040903 - 1594- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/11/03 8:13 .AM Page 4 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 723-7560 MOUND FIRE $0.98 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 750-2666 FIRE CHIEF -$174.55 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 751-3572 ENGINE #18 $2.,42 invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 751-3573 MOUND FIRE $1.78 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10-02 875-4502 RESCUE TRUCE $8.39 Invoice 040903 Cash'Payment E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 296-9058 BUSINAR $8.39 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Ceils 11-02 590-4351 P/W SKINNER $6.95 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 590-4351 P/W SKINNER $6.95 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 590-4351 PNV SKINNER. $6.95 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 723-7560 MOUND FIRE $0.98 invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 751-3572 ENGINE #18 $2.90 nvoice 040903 yment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 751-3573 MOUND FIRE $1,30 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 11-02 875-4502 RESCUE TRUCK $8.39 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 296-9058 BUSINARO $8.39 invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 590-4351 P/W SKINNER $6.95 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 590-4351 P/W SKINNER $6.95 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 590-4351 P/W SKINNER $6.95 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 723-7560 MOUND FIRE $0.98 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 751-3572 ENGINE #18 $3.06 invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 751-3573 MOUND FIRE $1.62 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 12-02 875-4502 RESCUE TRUCE $8.39 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Celts 01-03 296-9058 BUSINARO $8.39 invoice 040903 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 01-03 590-4351 P/W SKINNER $139,97 invoice 040903 Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 01-03 590-4351 P/W SKINNER $139.97 040903 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 01-03 590-4351 PNV SKINNER $139.97 Invoice 040903 - 1595- CITY OF MOUND 'Payments 04/11/03 8:13 AM Page 5 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment $0.98 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment $2.90 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment $1,78 invoice 040903 Cash Payment $8.39 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment $14.16 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment $52.85 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment $52,85 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment $52.85 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment $0.98 Invoice 040903 Cash Payment $1.14 invoice 040903 Cash Payment $0.98 Invoice 040903 Gash Payment $8.39 Invoice 040903 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $580.91 Fund Summary E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells E 222-42260'-321 Telephone & Cells E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Cells E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Ceils E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 01-03 723-7560 MOUND FIRE 01-03 751-3572 ENGINE #18 01-03 751-3573 MOUND FIRE 01-03 875-3502 RESCUE TRUCK 02-03 296-9058 BUSINARO 02-03 590-4351 P/W SKINNER 02-03 590-4351 P/W SKINNER 02-03 590-4351 P/W SKINNER 02-03 723-7560 MOUND FIRE 02-03 751-3572 ENGINE #18 02-03 751-3573 MOUND FIRE 02-03 875-4502 RESCUE TRUCKE 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $5,992.70 $763.23 $47.14 $1,000.00 $5,768.54 $700.74 $311.81 $14,584.16 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $14,584.16 $14,584.16 - 1596- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04114103 9:28 AM Page 1 Current Period: April 2003 Batch Name 041503SUE User Dollar Amt $13,382.23 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $13,382.23 $0.00 In Balance Refer 41103 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750~251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$189.70 Invoice 610902 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,879.13 Invoice 697903 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,058.51 Invoice 697902 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $59.80 invoice 697901 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $292.92 Invoice 697562 Cash Payment E 609-.49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,839.28 Invoice 694674 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale LIQUOR $2,476.57 Invoice 694673 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $382.50 Invoice 694483 ;ash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $0.00 694413 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,583.22 invoice 677843 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,382.23 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $13,382.23 $13,382.23 Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $13,382.23 Total $13,382.23 - 1597- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page I Current Period: April 2003 Batch Name 402203SUE User Dollar.~mt $352,537.29 Payments Refer 42203 A+ CLEANING CONTRACTORS, IN Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services Invoice 8935 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services Invoice 8919 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Computer Dollar Amt $352,537.29 $0.00 In Balance 03-03 CLEANING SERVICE 04-03 CLEANING $281.16 $1,260.96 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,542.12 Refer 42203 ALEXANDRIA TECHNICAL COLLEG Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training FIRE SCHOOL FLAIG,KEVIN $80.00 invoice 14457 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training FIRE SCHOOL GUSTAFSON,BRUCE $80.00 Invoice 14457 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training FIRE SCHOOL ROGERS,RICH $85.00 Invoice 14457 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $245.00 Refer 42203 ALLIED MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs MECHANICAL THRU 03-31-03 $13,620.00 Invoice A328901 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,620.00 Refer 42203 AMCON Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 03-30 PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG $8,095.79 Invoice 2459 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,095.79 Refer 42203 APF EMERGENCY REPAIR Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTION #4 $40.00 Invoice 26840 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTION #22 $20.00 Invoice 26840 Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTION #22 $20.00 Invoice 26840 Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTION #13 $40,00 Invoice 26840 Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTION #26 $40.00 Invoice 26840 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTION #18 $20.00 Invoice 26840 Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTION #18 $20.00 Invoice 26840 Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTION #6 $40.00 Invoice 26840 Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTION #5 $40.00 Invoice 26840 Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTION #8 $40,00 Invoice 26840 - 1598- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 2 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Paymen[ E 60149400400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTION #16 $40.00 Invoice 26840 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $360.00 Refer. 42203 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $55.92 Invoice DC309800 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CREDIT-ICE -$53.20 Invoice DB205800 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2.72 Refer 42203 ASPEN EMBROIDERY AND DESIG Cash Payment $1,502.20 Invoice 033103 Cash Payment $13.10 Invoice 041403 Cash Payment $13.10 Invoice 041403 Cash Payment $42.90 Invoice 041403 Cash Payment $41.15 invoice 041403 ;ash Payment $141.65 nvoice 041403 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,754.10 Refer 42203 ASSURED SECURITY Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings KEY CUT $18.64 Invoice 30981 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18.64 Refer 42203 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Se~vic 03-25-03 WELL #7 $349.00 Invoice 14290S Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total . $349.00 E 609-49750-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101.42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms EE UNIFORMS CLOTHING, NELSON, JOYCE CLOTHING, NELSON, JOYCE CLOTHING, NORLANDER, JILL CLOTHING SMITH, SARAH CLOTHING, SlMIONEAU, MATT Refer 42203 BALBOA CENTER LIMITED PARTN · Cash Payment E 496-46580.412 Building Rentals 05-03 FIRE STATION TEMPORARY $4,357.75 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,357.75 Refer 42203 BAUMGARDNER AND SONS Cash Payment E 601-49400~221 Equipment Par~s 0-RINGS,SEAL,ETC $544.68 Invoice 6366 PO 17687 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $544.68 Refer 42203 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,059.25 Invoice 26152900 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,467.48 Invoice 26097500 'ransaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,526.73 Refer 42203 BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC. - 1599- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 3 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment 03-03 MAIN STREET $20.39 Invoice 033103 Cash Payment 03-03 GARBAGE SERVICE $0.O0 Invoice 033103 Cash Payment 03-03 GARBAGE SERVICE $93.64 Invoice 033103 Cash Payment 03-03 GARBAGE SERVICE $38.68 Invoice 033103 Cash Payment 03-03 GARBAGE SERVICE $38.68 Invoice 033103 Cash Payment 03-03 GARBAGE SERVICE $38.67 Invoice 033103 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $230.06 Refer 42203 BLACKOWIAK AND SON ROLLOFF Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs ROLL-OFFS $360.00 Invoice 10143396 Cash Payment E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos ROLL-OFFS $1,056.00 Invoice 10143415 Cash Payment E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos ROLL-OFFS $224.44 Invoice 10143446 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,640.44 Refer 42203 BMS INTEGRATED OFFICE TECHN E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos Cash Payment E 101-42400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CLEAN TYPEWRITER $49.50 Invoice 73056 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CLEAN TYPEWRITER $16.50 Invoice 73056 Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CLEAN TYPEWRITER $16.50 Invoice 73056 Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repatrs/Maint Machinery CLEAN TYPEWRITER $16.50 Invoice 73056 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.00 Refer 42203 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHE Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract JAN.FEB.MARCH 2003 $630.00 Invoice P07MN027130031 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $630.00 Refer 42203 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials POWER STERING FLUID $7.57 invoice N8442 PO 17753 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials POWER STERING FLUID $7.57 invoice N8442 PO 17753 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials POWER STERING FLUID $7.56 Invoice N8442 PO 17753 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $22.70 Refer 42203 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 02-18-03 THRU 03-19-03 #543-000-053-000 $353.07 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 02-18-03 THRU 03-19-03 #543-001-095-800 $788.81 Invoice 042203 - 1600- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 4 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities 02-18-03 THRU 03-19-03 #543-001-882-t00 $1,201.36 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities CREDIT 02-18-03 THRU 03-03-03 -$582,11 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities 02-18-03 THRU 03-19-03 #543-001-853-000 $1,481.49 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities 02-18-03 THRU 03-19-03 #543-001-972-603 $720.63 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities 02-18-03 THRU 03-19-03 #543-001-972-603 $393.O7 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 02-18-03 THRU 03-19-03 #543-001-972-603 $524.10 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/15/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,880.42 Refer 42203 CHADWICK AND MERTZ Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 03-03 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $6,777.30 Invoice 033103 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,777.30 Refer 42203 CHAMPION AUTO Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $20.31 Invoice D186681 Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials SEA FOAM $13.28 Invoice D188158 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair POLE, FLEX GUARD $10.63 Invoice D187265 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Qperating Supplies ELECTRIC FUEL PUMP $66.02 Invoice D189136 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies POWER OUTLET $29.76 Invoice D189079 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies POWER OUTLET $29.76 Invoice D189079 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $169.76 Refer 42203 CHIEFS POLICE ASSOC MINNESO Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MULTI JURISDICITON NETWORK $500.00 ORGANIZATION Invoice 1350 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $500.00 Refer 42203 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MIX $318.88 invoice 61311241 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $318.88 Refer 42203 COLOTTI, JOHN A. Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells 2-LINE SPEAKER PHONE $137.16 Invoice 042203 PO 17696 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells 4-LINE SPEAKER PHONE $138,54 nvoice 042203 PO 17696 Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells CORDLESS PHONE $79.96 invoice 042203 PO 17696 - 1601 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 5 Current Period: April 2003 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $355.66 Refer 42203 CONCO, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal 05-03 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $542.2.5 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest 05-03 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $419.59 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $961.84 Refer 42203 CONCRETE CUT'I'ING AND CORIN Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies PUMP,HOSE,FITTINGS $755.62 invoice 20992 PO 17747 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies PUMP,HOSE,FITTINGS $755.62 Invoice 20992 PO 17747 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,511.24 Refer 42203 CORPRO COMPANIES, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 06-01-03 THRU 05-31-04 STORAGE TANK $990.00 AGREEMENT Invoice 0005047 PO 17751 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $990,00 Refer 42203 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $427.15 invoice 214649 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $427.15 Refer 42203 DOMINO ENGINEERING CORPOR Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply KEYPAD,KEYLESS ENTRY $94.65 Invoice 67434 PO 17671 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $94.65 Refer 42203 E-Z RECYCLING Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic 04-03 CURBSIDE RECYCLING $8,075.25 Invoice 49795 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,075.25 Refer 42203 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,946.65 Invoice 385486 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $32.90 Invoice 382212 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,325.35 invoice 382211 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,304.90 Refer 42203 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $975.00 Invoice 20714 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $975.00 Refer 42203 EMERGENCY APPARA TUS MAINT Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR LADDER #11 $432.25 Invoice 12887 - 1602- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11 ;29 AM Page 6 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $432.25 Refer 42203 EMERGENCY MANAGERS ASSOC, Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP $100.00 Invoice 042203 PO 17790 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.00 Refer 42203 EMPIREHOUSE, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 022122 $3,990.00 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,990.00 Refer 42203 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise Fo~'R MIX $32.00 Invoice 113524 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32.00 Refer 42203 FALNESS, RUSS Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND SHARE FEE $100.00 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $18.75 nvoice 042203 ~ Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $368.75 Refer 42203 FITZCO, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies PROPERTY BAGS $86.27 Invoice 18862 PO 17599 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $86.27 Refer 42203 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts FLEXICROME ROD W/COUPLING $720.94 Invoice 7874 PO 17685 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $720.94 Refer 42203 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 03-03 472-3555 $210.23 Invoice 050403 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $210,23 Refer 42203 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE AND RESC Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies NOZZLE, HOSE,ETC $2,097.85 invoice 8531 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,097.85 Refer 42203 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniform; 04-01-03 UNIFORMS ' $20.66 Invoice 531129 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-01-03 UNIFORMS $20.66 invoice 531129 ;ash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 04-01-03 UNIFORMS $20.66 531129 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 04-01-03 MATS $40.18 Invoice 531129 - 1603- CITY OF MOUND 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 7 Payments Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 04-01-03 MATS $40.18 invoice 531129 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 04-01-03 MATS $40.19 Invoice 531129 Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 04-15-03 MATS $52.85 invoice 544982 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 04-15-03 MATS $16.21 Invoice 544981 Cash Payment 04-15-03 MATS $57.18 Invoice 544983 Cash Payment 04-15-03 MATS $78.16 Invoice 544980 Cash Payment 04-08-03 UNIFORMS $30.16 Invoice 538055 Cash Payment 04-08-03 UNIFORMS $30.16 Invoice 538055 Cash Payment 04-08-03 UNIFORMS $30.15 Invoice 538055 Cash Payment 04-08-03 MATS $20.62 Invoice 538055 Cash Payment 04-08-03 MATS $20.62 Invoice 538055 Cash Payment 04-08-03 MATS $20.62 Invoice 538055 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $539,26 Refer 42203 GALLS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair SIREN $272,62 Invoice 5636281201018 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $272,62 E 10t-41910-460 Janitorial Services E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials Refer 42203 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice #32345800 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice #32345800 02-28-03 #32345800 $33.86 03-31-03 #32345800 $29.26 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $63.12 Refer 42203 GREAT LAKES SPECIALTY PRODU Cash Payment E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LAMINATED SIGN $814.40 Invoice 303574 PO 17659 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $814.40 Refer 42203 HANSON, KANDIS Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 03-10-03 DSL LINE $49.95 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 04-10-03 DSL LILNE $49~95 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.90 Refer 42203 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals . CONTAINERS (6) $30.00 Invoice DM87234 - 1604- CITY OF MOUND 04/ z/0311:'29 AM Page 8 Payments Current Period: April 2003 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $30.00 Refer 42203 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery PLATE $14.16 Invoice 45328 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14.16 Refer 42203 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-31-03 NETWORK SUPPORT $34.34 Invoice 23037038 Cash Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals RADIO LEASE CHARGE $503.42 Invoice 23038013 Cash Payment E 101-42110-418 Other Rentals RADIO LEASE $1,173.34 Invoice 23038014 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,711.10 Refer 42203 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR (R Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 02-03 ROOM AND BOARD $2,301.00 Invoice 000962 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,301.00 Refer 42203 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER .;ash Payment E 101-45200-300 Professional Srvs SKATE PARK $68.75 Dice 2003-39 ;ash Payment E 101-45200-300 Professional Srvs PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $87.50 Invoice 44130 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $156.25 Refer 42203 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training INCIDENT MANAGEMENT MYERS $1,488.65 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,488.65 Refer 42203 HILL, DANNY WEATHERHEAD, PA Cash Payment R 101-34114 Planning Commission Approv REFUND VARIANCE FEE $250.00 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 42203 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 LOST LAKE GREENWAY Invoice 040803-A Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 CR 15 STREETSCAPE Invoice 040803-B Cash Payment G Invoice 040803-Cl Cash Payment E Invoice 040803-C2 Cash Payment G Invoice 040803-D1 Cash Payment G 040803-D2 Payment G Invoice 040803-D3 101-22917 Three Points Var Becke #03- 03-03 STODDARD CASE REVIEW 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 PLANNING MISCELLANEOUS 101-22931 2241 Southview Ln,03-10 W 03-03 WARA SKETCH PLAN 101~22918 42XX Lynwood, Coddon, #02 03-03 CODDON VARIANCE 101-22917 Three Points Var Becke #03- 03-03 STODDARD SUB-DIVISION $2,725.00 $6,869.57 $80.00 $703.75 $360.00 $320.00 $160.00 - 1605- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 9 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment G 101-22921 2954 Oaklawn. #03-07,Lazni 03-03 LAZNIARZ SUB-DIVISION $160.O0 Invoice 040803,D4 Cash Payment E 101-41110-300 Professional Srvs 03-0 SERVICE DISTRICT $838.O0 Invoice 040803-E Cash Payment E 455-46379-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 MOUND VISIONS $516.O0 Invoice 040803-F Cash Payment G 101-22908 Landform Development 03-03 LANDFORM DEVELOPMENT $738.O0 Invoice 040803-G Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,470.32 Refer 42203 HOME DEPOT/GECF Cash Payment E 609.49750~210 Operating Supplies PAPER FILTERS LADDER $1 '16.O9 Invoice 000428/4070505 PO 17750 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies PAPER FILTERS,LADDER $14.86 Invoice 000428/4070505 PO 17750 Cash Payment PHONE HOLDERS $4.24 Invoice 0130735 Cash Payment PHONE HOLDERS $4.24 invoice 0130745 Cash Payment PHONE HOLDERS $4,24 Invoice 0130745 Cash Payment PHONE HOLDERS $6.36 Invoice 2020166 Cash Payment PHONE HOLDERS $6.36 Invoice 2020166 Cash Payment PHONE HOLDERS $6.35 Invoice 2020166 Cash Payment PHONE HOLDERS $6.36 invoice 2082813 Cash Payment PHONE HOLDERS $6.36 Invoice 2082813 Cash Payment PHONE HOLDERS $6.35 Invoice 2082813 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $181.81 Refer 42203 HUMANE SOCIETY WRIGHT COUN Cash Payment E 101-42110-445 Dog Kennel Fees 1ST QTR IMPOUND SERVICES $310,00 Invoice 040103 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $310,00 Refer 42203 IFP TEST SERVICES, INC. Cash Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINATION $495.00 Invoice 032103 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $495.00 Refer 42203 IKON OFFICE MACHINES Cash Payment E 101-42110-202 Duplicating and copying 03-24-03 THRU 04-24-03 MAINTENANCE $125.17 Invoice 23675346 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $125.17 Refer 42203 INFRATECH Cash Payment ' E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts NOZZLES.HOSE,BLADE $1,192.76 Invoice 030305 PO 17681 E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601.49400-230 Shop Materials E 602.49450-230 Shop Materials E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601.49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials - 1606- CITY OF MOUND Payments Page 10 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 RepaidMaint Supply PIN F CONNECTOR $200.06 Invoice 030495 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies MARKING PAINT $47.42 Invoice 030453 PO 17749 Transaction Date 4~7~2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,440.24 Refer 42203 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE MUNI Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP $95.00 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.00 Refer 42203 lOS CAPITAL Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying Invoice 58328632 Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying Invoice 58328632 Cash Payment E 222.42260-202 Duplicating and copying Invoice 58328632 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 ;ash Payment 12782 Cash Payment Invoice 12802 Cash Payment Invoice 12823 Cash Payment Invoice 12839 Cash Payment Invoice 12862 Cash Payment Invoice 12905 Cash Payment Invoice 12942 Transaction Date 10-09-02 THRU 01-08-03 CANON MAINTENANCE 01-09-03 THRU 04-08-03 CANON MAINTENANCE 04-09-03 THRU 07-08-03 Wells Fargo 10100 -$104.74 $99.75 $99.75 Total $94.76 Refer 42203 ISLAND PARK SKELLY E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MOUNT,BALANCE TIRES $77.86 E 101-42110.404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $25.86 E 101.42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery LEAK UNDER DASH $27.00 E 101.42110.404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MAF SENSOR $316.93 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery THERMOSTAT OUTLET $90.18 E 101.42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OIL CHANGE $28.25 E 101.42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery WHEEL ROTATION $55.55 4/1012003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $621.63 Refer 42203 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVIC Cash Payment E 222.42260-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR #24 $814.95 Invoice 0000230 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $814.95 Refer 42203 JOHNS VARIETY AND PETS Cash Paymen[ Invoice 125320 Cash Payment Invoice 125318 Date 4/16/2003 42203 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 1544270 E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies E 609.49750-210 Operating Supplies TABLECLOTHS SCISSORS Wells Fargo WINE $4,24 $13,17 10100 Total $17,41 $1,525.93 - 1607- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 11 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $662.O5 Invoice 1541298 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $23.99 Invoice 1541297 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $706.70 Invoice 1541296 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,429.43 Invoice 1541295 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,348.10 Refer 42203 JOHNSON, PHYLLIS Cash Payment E 455-46381-600 Debt Srv Principal 05-03 PRINCIPLE TRUE VALUE $285.59 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 455-46381-611 Bond Interest 05-03 INTEREST TRUE VALUE $383.52 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $669.11 Refer 42203 KUSTOM SIGNALS Cash Payment E 101-42110-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR VHS RECORDER $68.86 invoice 155945 Cash Payment E 101-42110-409 Other Equipment Repair BATTER $116.50 Invoice 156167 PO 17598 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $185.36 Refer 42203 LAKE MINNETONKA COMM. COM Cash Payment E 101-49840-300 Professional Srvs 1ST QTR 2003 ACCESS FEE $10,956.56 Invoice 040203 Transaction Date 4/1112003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,956.56 Refer 42203 LAKE MINNETONKA OONVERSA TI Cash Payment E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2ND QTR LEVY PAYMENT $4,948.30 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,948.30 Refer 42203 LAKE RESTORATION, INC. Cash Payment E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic BEACHWOOD POND (3) TREATMENTS $1,307.10 invoice 042203 PO 17752 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,307.10 Refer 42203 LAKER NEWSPAPER E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 04-05-03 WELL #8 AD FOR BIDS $61.69 Cash Payment invoice 575 Cash Payment E 401-43105-300 Professional Srvs 04-50-30 2003 STREET PROJECT AD FOR $69.65 BIDS Invoice 576 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $131.34 Refer 42203 LAKER/PIONEER NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising ADVERTISING $273.00 Invoice 022803 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $273.00 Refer 42203 LAKESHORE WEEKL Y NEWS - 1608- CiTY OF MOUND Payments 04117103 11:29 AM Page 12 Cash Payment E 609-49750-328 Employment Advertising 03-26-03 CLASSIFIED AD $56.70 Invoice 26286 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $56.70 Refer 42203 LAWSON PRODUCTS,/NC Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $87.35 Invoice 0741231 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $87.35 Invoice 0741231 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $87.35 Invoice 0741231 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $262,05 Refer 42203 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T Cash Payment E 101-41110-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc QTRLY WORKERS COMP $87.08 Invoice 1513 Cash Payment $70.13 Invoice 1513 Cash Payment $193.46 Invoice 1513 Cash Payment $2,256.28 Invoice 1513 ;ash Payment $227.32 1513 Cash Payment $846.41 Invoice 1513 Cash Payment $195.88 Invoice 1513 Cash Payment $5,603.21 Invoice 1513 Cash Payment $810.13 invoice 1513 Cash Payment $1,165.62 Invoice 1513 Cash Payment $1,721.83 Invoice 1513 Cash Payment $246.67 Invoice 1513 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,424.00 Refer 42203 LEROY JOB TRUCKING, INCORPO Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous ANIMAL RENDERING $120.00 Invoice 1363 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120,00 E 101-41310-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 'QTRLY WORKERS COMP E 101-41500-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc QTRLY WORKERS COMP E 101-42110-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc QTRLY WORKERS COMP E 101-42400-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc QTRLY WORKERS COMP E 101-43100-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc QTRLY WORKERS COMP E 101-45200-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc QTRLY WORKERS COMP E 222-42260-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc QTRLY WORKERS COMP E 609-49750-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc QTRLY WORKERS COMP E 601-49400-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc QTRLY WORKERS COMP E 602-49450-151 Worker's Comp lnsuranc QTRLy WORKERS COMP E 281-45210-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc QTRLY WORKERS COMP $19.80 Total $19.80 $3,564.85 Refer 42203 MADDEN, FRANK AND ASSOCIA T Cash Payment E 101-49999-300 Professional Srvs 03-31-03 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Invoice A040103 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 42203 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 527829 - 1609- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 13 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $76.00 Invoice 526662 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $660.00 Invoice 525648 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,525.95 Invoice 525647 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,826.80 Refer 42203 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 03-17-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $14.40 Invoice 12142 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 03-20-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $127.80 Invoice 12163 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 03-24-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $15.30 Invoice 12176 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 03-27-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $175.50 Invoice 12199 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 03~31-03 DELIVERY CHARGE $76.50 Invoice 12211 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $409.50 Refer 42203 MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCI Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 03~03 WESTEDGE MISC ENGINEERING $110.90 Invoice 43187 Project 07827 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 WESTEDGE WATERMAIN EXTENSION $51.50 Invoice 43188 Project 07953 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 ENGINEERING SERVICES MISC $51.50 Invoice 43189 Project 08900 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 PLANNING MISC ENGINEERING $1,287.50 Invoice 43190 Project 08901 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 P/Z MISC ENGINEERING $772.50 Invoice 43191 Project 08902 Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 STREET MISC ENGINEERING $103.00 Invoice 43192 Project 08903 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 WATER MISC ENGINEERING $51.50 Invoice 43193-A Project 08904 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 SEWER MISC ENGINEERING $51,50 Invoice 43193-B Project 08904 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 STORM SEWER PROJECT $106.50 invoice 43194 Project 10293 Cash Payment G 101-22857 Three Points, Backer Propert 03-03 BECKER GRADING PERMIT $51.50 Invoice 43195 Project 12162 Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 CTY RD 15 RELOCATION $772.50 Invoice 43196 Project 12533 Cash Payment G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi 03-03 LANGDON BAY DEVELOPMENT $221.80 invoice 42197 Project 12754 Cash Payment E 455-46390-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 XCEL SUB-STATION $257,50 Invoice 43198 Project 13190 Cash Payment E 101-45200-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 SKATE PARK $490.50 Invoice 43199 Project 13207 -1610- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 14 Current PeriOd: April 2003 Cash Payment invoice 43200 Cash Payment Invoice 43201 Cash Payment Invoice 43202 Cash Payment Invoice 43203-A Cash Payment Invoice 42303-B Cash Payment Invoice 42304 Cash Payment Invoice 42305 Cash Payment invoice 43206 Cash Payment invoice 43207 Cash Payment invoice 43208 Cash Payment nvoice 43209 Payment Invoice 43210 Cash Payment Invoice 43211 Cash Payment Invoice 43213 Cash Payment Invoice 43214 Cash Payment Invoice 43212 Cash Payment invoice 43215 E 10143100-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT $51.50 Project 13215 E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 WELL/PUMPHOUSE $2,183.70 Project 13313 E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 LONGPRE BLDG DEMO $443.20 Project 13314 G 101-22891 Kells Lane Vacation, J. Paul 03-03 KELLS ROAD VACATION $25.75 Project 13327 G 101-22895 Kells Lane Vacation Jeff Paul 03-03 KELLS ROAD VACATION $25.75 Project 13327 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 6384 WALNUT LANE GRADING $360.50 Project 13488 G 101-22860 2642 Commerce, Bristol Clas 03-03 MAHOGANY BAY $103.00 Project 13495 E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 LOST LAKE/AUDTIORS ROAD $3,660.50 Project 13566 G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 03-03 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $163.70 Project 13646 G 101-22892 4778/4790 Northern Road #0 03-03 BERGQUIST MINOR SUB-DIV $539.00 Project 13667 E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 STORM WATER IMPROVEMENT $59.40 Project 13677 E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT $761.50 Project 13681 E 101-43100~300 Professional Srvs 03-03 RNV FRANCHISE ORDINANCE $154.50 Project 13709 G 101-22899 Pastuck Natural Homes #02- 03-03 PASTUCK SUB-DIViSION $269.50 Project 13770 G 101-22900 2331 Driftwood, Johnson, su 03-03 2331 DRIFTWOOD LANE JOHNSON $51.50 Project 13970 E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY $461,50 Project 13747 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY $51.50 Project 14000 03-03 UTILITY MAP UPDATE $167.65 Project 14103 03-03 UTILITY MAP UPDATE $167.65 Project 14103 E 101-41500-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS GASB $376.00 Project 14120 E 401-43105-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION $8,146.60 Project 14121 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 NPDES PHASE II MS4 PERMITTING $1,782.20 Project 14137 G 101-22930 6382 Maple Rd,03-05,Hagen/ 03-03 6382 MAPLE ROAD 03-05 VARIANCE $51.50 Project 14189 G 101-22931 2241 Southview Ln,03-10 W 03~03 2241 SOUTHVEIW 03-10 SUB-DIVISION $206.00 Project 14275 G 101-22917 Three Points Var Becke #03- 03-03 THREE PTS BECKER #03-01 $921.00 Project 14277 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 43216-A Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 43216-B Cash Payment Invoice 43217 Cash Payment Invoice 43218 Cash Payment Invoice 43219 Cash Payment Invoice 43220 Payment ~nvoice 43221 Cash Payment Invoice 43222 -1611 - CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 15 Cash Payment G 101-22918 42XX Lynwood, Coddon, #02 03-03 52XX LYNWOOD,#03-04,CODDON $309.00 invoice 43223 Project 14278 Cash Payment G 101-22924 6380 Bayridge Rd Stone 03- 03-03 6380 BAYRIDGE RD #03-11 $103.O0 Invoice 43224 Project 14280 Cash Payment G 101-22932 1840 Shorewood Ln,Grading 03-03 1840 SHOREWOO $51 Invoice 43225 Project 14286 Cash Payment G 101-22933 3301 Warner Rd,03-21,Chitk 03-03 3301 WARNER,#03-21,CHITKA $51.50 Invoice 43226 Project 14295 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $26,279.80 Refer 42203 METRO SYSTEMS Cash Payment E 609-49750-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA OFFICE FURNITURE $1,080.14 Invoice 29170 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,080.14 Refer 42203 METRO WEST INSPECTIONS Cash Payment E 222-42260~300 Professional Srvs 02-03 FIRE INSPECTIONS $490.00 Invoice 022803 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $490.00 Refer 42203 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR Cash Payment G 602-21825 SAC Deposits 03-03 SAC CHARGES $5,049.00 Invoice 033103 Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste DisposaI-MCIS 05-03 WASTEWATER $42,328.00 Invoice 00000754095 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47,377,00 Refer 42203 MINNCOMM PAGING Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. 04-03 PAGER SERVICES $111.31 Invoice 20233304037 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $111.31 Refer 42203 MINNESOTA ANIMAL CONTROL A Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2003 DUES FOR CSO $30.00 Invoice 042203 PO 17788 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $30,00 Refer 42203 MINNESOTA BOARD PEACE OFFI Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions SUSSMAN #13664 $90.00 Invoice 042203 PO 17793 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $90.00 Refer 42203 MINNESOTA DEPT ECONOMIC SE Cash Payment E 101-45200-140 Unemployment Comp CREDIT--4TH QTR -$75,15 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 101-45200-140 Unemployment Comp 1ST QTR 2003 UNEMPLOYMENT $895.56 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $820.41 Refer 42203 MINNESOTA FIRE AGENCIES PUR Cash Payment E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES $35.00 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35.00 Refer 42203 MINNESOTA FIRE CERTIF BOARD -1612- CITY OF MOUND Payments o4/17/03 11:29 AM Page 16 Cash Payment E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions CERTIFICATION $150.O0 TESTING,FLAIG,GUSTAFSON,ROGE RS Invoice 476 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.00 Refer 42203 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOC/A T/O Cash Payment E 895-49990-124 Fire Pens Contrib 03-03 FIRE RELIEF $9,361.66 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,361.66 Refer 42203 MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 street Maint Materials UPM COLD $995.96 Invoice 76105 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $995.96 Refer 42203 NATIONAL WATERWORKS Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply TOUCH READER $366.67 Invoice 9245143 PO 17689 Transaction Date 4/712003 Wells Fargo 101 O0 Total $366.67 Refer 42203 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY, I Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 RepaidMaint Supply CANS $115.94 Invoice po62328000025 .3ash Payment E 101-45200-220 RepaidMaint Supply CANS $221.59 PO62328000017 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $337.53 Refer 42203 NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN Cash Payment E 670-49500-210 Operating Supplies BLUE TARPS $110.74 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair LIGHTS,WlRE,ETC $38.28 Invoice 07935930 PO 17691 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $149.02 Refer 42203 NRC PROCESSING SOLLUTIONS L Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services THRU 03-03 LEAVE SERVICE $12,500.00 Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,500.00 Refer 42203 OFFICE DIRECT, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies DICTAPHONE $584.00 Invoice 30149 PO 17787 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $584.00 Refer 42203 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call Invoice 3030535 Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call Invoice 3030535 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 42203 PARSONS ELECTRIC Invoice 57581 03-03 LOCATES $59.68 03-03 LOCATES $59.67 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $119.35 E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA OUTLET RECEPT AREA $132.22 -1613- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 17 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA CLERK/DOCK OUTLET $350.80 Invoice 57580 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $483.02 Refer 42203 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$429,23 Invoice 10574 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$200.00 Invoice 8002841-CM Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $800.00 Invoice 8002727-1N Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$112.00 Invoice 8002233-CM Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,336.15 Invoice 8002518-1N Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,394.92 Refer 42203 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $84.20 Invoice 42183865 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $84.20 Refer 42203 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE $30.80 Invoice 3272973 Cash Payment CREDIT-WINE -$25.02 invoice 3276706 Cash Payment CREDIT-WINE -$96,90 Invoice 3276707 Cash Payment CREDIT-WINE -$4,16 Invoice 3276708 Cash Payment CREDIT-WINE -$14.24 Invoice 3276709 Cash Payment CREDIT-WINE -$3.00 Invoice 3276710 Cash Payment WINE $894.80 invoice 938142 Cash Payment LIQUOR $3,325.00 Invoice 938141 Cash Payment WINE $1,536.15 Invoice 935901 Cash Payment LIQUOR $2.216.15 Invoice 935900 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7.859.58 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale $25.00 $305.35 $4,139.16 Refer 42203 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 247471-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 247201-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 246788-00 -1614- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 18 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment E 60g-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $111.17 Invoice 246621-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,303.58 Invoice 244516-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $201.17 invoice 244424-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,090.58 Invoice 244077-00 Cash Payment E 609-49750~254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $144.63 Invoice 244062-00 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,320.64 Refer 42203 R.C. ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings REPLACE 2 BALLASTS $188.90 Invoice 040803 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $188.90 Refer 42203 REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AIR AND OXYGEN $22.45 Invoice R03021036 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $22.45 42203 RILEY, DETTMANN, AND KELSEY .. Payment E 101-49999-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 CLASSIFICATIONS $450.00 Invoice 6570 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $450.00 Refer 42203 RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEG Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 04-13-03 REGISTRATION FLAIG,KEVIN $80.00 Invoice 002000SFS-6 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 04-13-03 $80.00 REGISTRATION,GUSTAFSON,BRUCE Invoice 002000SFS-8 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 04-13-03 REGISTRATION, HENTGES,MATT $80.00 invoice 002000SFS-6 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.00 Refer 42203 SAMARITAN TIRE WHOLESALE Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TIRES FOR SQUAD #845 $210.00 Invoice 116407 PO 17589 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $210.00 Refer 42203 SCHADTRACY SIGNS Cash Payment E 609-49750-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA CHANNEL LETTERS ON RACEWAYS $2,281.30 Invoice 0023223-1N Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,281.30 Refer 42203 SCHARBER AND SONS Cash Paymen[ E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA JOHN DEERE MOWER $620.90 Invoice 8928 PO 17684 O ransaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $620.90 -1615- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 19 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 04-03 FIRE MONITORING $23.38 Invoice 33245 Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 04-03 BURGLER MONITORING $20.18 Invoice 33245 Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 04-03 FIRE TEST $10.65 Invoice 33245 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $54.21 Refer 42203 SETTERANDASSOCIATES Cash Payment E 101-42110-300 Professional Srvs BACKGROUND CHECK $1,990.85 Invoice 04801 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,990.85 Refer 42203 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, I Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 03-03 SAFETY BUILDING DESIGN $7,746.55 Invoice 0099343 Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 01-03 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $620.82 Invoice 0097089 Transaction Date 4/16/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,367.37 Refer 42203 SOS PRINTING Cash Payment E 101-42400-203 Printed Forms BUSINESS CARDS $46.59 Invoice 64494 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising BUSINESS CARDS $271.76 Invoice 64547 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $318.35 Refer 42203 SOUTH CENTRAL TECHNICAL CO E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 03-03 FIRE SCHOOL VANECEK $60.00 Cash Payment Invoice 29980 Cash Payment Invoice 29980 Cash Payment Invoice 29980 Transaction Date E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 03-03 FIRE SCHOOL SIPPREL $60.00 E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 03-03 FIRE SCHOOL CRAWFORD $60.00 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $180.00 Refer 42203 SOUTHWESTTRAILSASSOClATIO Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow LOGTUCKER2000 $410.00 Invoice EF0000510007 Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow GROOMINGLOGN 02/03 $2,280.00 invoice EF0000510007 Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow 02-03-03 THRU 02-15-03 $4,835.70 Invoice EF0000510007 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,525.70 Refer 42203 SPUR STATION Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 03-03 SQUAD WASHES $115.71 Invoice 033103 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $115.71 Refer 42203 STEININGER, MAX, INCORPORAT Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs DEMOLITION $35,340.00 invoice REQUEST i -1616- CiTY OF MOUND Payments 04117103 11;29 AM Page 20 Current Period: April 2003 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35,340.00 Refer 42203 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY Cash Payment E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions Invoice 042203 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Refer 42203 SWEEPER SERVICES E 101-43100-221 Equipment Pads Cash Payment Invoice 5263 Cash Payment Invoice 5273 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply 2003 MEMBERSHIP ASSESSMENT $300.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.00 SHEAR PINS,CABLES $167.35 JACKSHAFT BEARING $133.44 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.79 Refer 42203 TAPES PLUS ADVERTISING Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising APRIL-AUG ADVERTISING SPACE $250.00 invoice TP22005 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 42203 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale CREDIT-BEER ~$1,543.25 Invoice 288213-B Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,062.65 nvoice 293419 ;h Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $26.30 Invoice 293418 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $231.50 Invoice 253639 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,777.20 Refer 42203 THRIFTY WHITE DRUG STORE Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies LIQUID SOAP $4.88 Invoice 574846 Transaction Date 4/10/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4.68 Refer 42203 THURK BROTHERS CHEVROLET Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTO REPAIRS $303.18 Invoice 125865 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTO REPAIRS $373.32 Invoice 125886 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $676.50 Refer 42203 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies REGISTER PAPER $531.80 Invoice 14813 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies REGISTER PAPER $126.74 invoice 15048 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $658.54 Refer 42203 TRUE VALUE, MOUND ash Payment E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply MISCELANEOUS SUPPLIES $103.10 Wnvoice 043103 ~Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies MISCELANEOUS SUPPLIES $158.11 Invoice 043103 -1617' CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 21 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment MISCELANEOUS SUPPLIES $14.18 Invoice 043103 Cash Payment MISCELANEOUS SUPPLIES $81.28 Invoice 043103 Cash Payment MISCELANEOUS SUPPLIES $47.48 Invoice 043103 Cash Payment MISCELANEOUS SUPPLIES $64.45 invoice 043103 Cash Payment MISCELANEOUS SUPPLIES $14.91 Invoice 043103 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies MISCELANEOUS SUPPLIES $14.05 Invoice 043103 Cash Payment E 222'42260-210 Operating Supplies MISCELANEOUS SUPPLIES $348.06 Invoice 043103 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $825.62 Refer 42203 TWIN CITIES ABATEMENT TECHN Cash Payment E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs DEMO ABATEMENT $4,000.00 Invoice 295 Transaction Date 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,000.00 E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES INK JET CARTRIDGES PHOTO PAPER STACK FILE,HIGHLIGHTERS MONITOR ORGANIZER,ETC PHOTO PAPER $29.26 $29.26 $29.26 $29.26 $29.26 $9.75 $9.75 $14,63 $14.64 $246.99 $15.58 $239.53 $49.12 $15.96 Refer 42203 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 381340-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 381340-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 381340-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 381340-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 381340-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 381340-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies invoice 381340-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 381340-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 381340-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 380684-0 PO 17593 Cash Payment E 101-42110-20~) Office Supplies Invoice 381966-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 380434-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 381238-0 PO 17786 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 381380-0 -1618- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 22 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.83 Invoice 381824-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.83 Invoice 381824-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.83 Invoice 381824-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.83 invoice 381824-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $11.83 Invoice 381824-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.94 Invoice 381824-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.94 Invoice 381824-0 Cash P~iyment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $5.91 Invoice 381824-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $5.90 Invoice 381824-0 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies CUP BINDERS $3.50 Invoice 378969-1 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies HANGING FOLERS $47.88 )ice 380199-0 Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies HANGING FOLDERS $20.24 Invoice 380761-0 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies CREDIT-HANGING FOLDERS -$8.81 Invoice 379076-0a Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES -$17.32 Invoice 377593-0a Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES -$17.32 Invoice 377593-0a Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES -$17,32 Invoice 377593-0a Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES -$17.32 Invoice 377593-0a Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES -$17,32 Invoice 377593-0a Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES -$5.77 Invoice 377593-0a Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES -$5,77 Invoice 377593~0a Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES -$8.66 Invoice 377593-0a Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES -$8.65 invoice 377593-0a Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $58.17 Invoice 380673-0 Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $58.17 invoice 380673-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $58.17 Invoice 380673-0 -1619- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 23 Current Period: April 2003 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies $58.17 Invoice 380673-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies $58.17 Invoice 380673-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies $19.39 Invoice 380673-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies $19.39 Invoice 380673-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $29.10 Invoice 380673-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $29.10 invoice 380573-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies $7.97 Invoice 382889-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies $7.97 Invoice 382889-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies $7.97 inVoice 382889-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies $7.97 invoice 382889-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies $7.97 Invoice 382889-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies $2.66 Invoice 382889-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies $2.66 invoice 382889-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $3.98 Invoice 382889-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $3.95 Invoice 382889-0 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies $1.17 Invoice 382889-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies $2.34 Invoice 382889-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies $2.35 invoice 382889-0 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,235.24 Refer 42203 UNITED RENTALS Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials WARNING LIGHTS $169.34 Invoice 638760 PO 17688 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $169.34 Refer 42203 V & S JEWELERS Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous PLAQUE AND ENGRAVE $86.32 Invoice 766965 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies PLASTIC SIGNAGE $21.30 Invoice 766966 Transaction Date 4/7/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $107.62 Refer 42203 VILLAGE CHEVROLET MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES DISKS DISKS DISKS - 1620- CITY OF MOUND Payments 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 24 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIR SQUAD #842 $292.99 Invoice CVCS318550 Transaction Date 4/14/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $292.99 Refer 42203 WICKENHAUSER EXCAVATING, IN Cash Payment E 402.43120-300 Professional Srvs REQUEST #2~-FINAL $3,247.90 Invoice REQUEST #2 Transaction Date 4/15/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,247.90 Refer 42203 WIDMER, INCORPORATED E 440.43140.440 Other Contractual Se~ic 03-03 SNOWPLOWING $1,527.50 Cash Payment Invoice 5996 Cash Payment Invoice 6003 Cash Payment Invoice 6004 Transaction Date E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-21-03 REPAIR GATE VALVE $475.00 E 601-49400.400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-20-03 REPAIR WATERMAIN $636.00 4/11/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,638.50 Refer 42203 WILLIAMS TOWING Cash Payment E 101-42110.436 Towing Charges 03-12-03 SQUAD #840 $45.75 Invoice 62434 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $45.75 invoice 1955-00 Transaction Date 4/17/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,806.25 Refer 42203 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Etectdc Utilities 03-03 SERVICE $5,109.08 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities 03-03 SERVICE #2245-301-939 $833.14 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities 03-03 SERVICE #0466-607-223 $21.99 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 609.49750-381 Electric Utilities 03-03 SERVICE #19'14-601.425 $0.00 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities 03-03 SERVICE #0217-606-329 $2,302.37 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electdc Utilities 03-03 SERVICE #2184-407-147 $39.82 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 101.45200-381 Electric Utilities 03-03 SERVICE #0047-005-229 $174.35 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 03-03 SERVICE #0864-508-832 $101.45 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities 03-03 SERVICE #0864-508-832 $101.45 Invoice 042203 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electdc Utilities 03-03 SERVICE #0864-508-832 $101.45 Invoice 042203 ;ash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities 03-03 SERVICE #0018-802-634 $1,443.40 042203 Cash Payment E 101.43100-381 Electric Utilities 03-03 SERVICE #0009-604-835 $282.18 Invoice 042203 - 1621 - CITY OF MOUND Payments ' 04/17/03 11:29 AM Page 25 Current Period: April 2003 Transaction Date 4/8/2003 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,510.68 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT 440 CBD FUND 455 TIF 1-2 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 895 FIRE RELIEF FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $76,537.25 $14,296.44 $616.59 $14,912.65 $3,247.90 $1,527.50 $11,464.72 $78,592.41 $11,534.04 $55,277.50 $53,009.64 $20,685.99 $1,473.00 $9,361.66 $352,537.29 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $352,537.29 $352,537.29 - 1622- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PUBLIC LANDS REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council and Staff Sarah smith, Community Development Director April 14, 2003 Public Lands Permit Application - 3207 Devon Lane Stephen Camp Hanover Road (unimproved) Right-Of-Way Continuation of Structure(s) (staircase and retaining wall(s) REQUEST The applicant, Steven Camp, owns the property located at 3207 Devon Lane and has submitted a Public Lands Permit application to allow continuation of a stair structure and retaining wall(s) which are located (9) feet within the Hanover Road (unimproved) right-of-way. BACKGROUND HISTORY The stair structure and retaining wall system were installed previously by the applicant without City permits in 1998-99. As the matter was unresolved at the staff level, it was subsequently forwarded to City Prosecuting Attorney Craig Mertz for legal processing. The court case was resolved in June 2002 subject to specific conditions including the submittal of an "as-built" survey to demonstrate compliance with the terms of the settlement agreement and approval of a Public Lands Permit by the City Council to allow continuation of the improvements. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 18, 19, and 20, Block 10, Devon. CITY CODE 320 - PRIVATE STRUCTURES AND PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION ACTMTIES ON PUBLIC LAND City Code 320.01 regulates private structures and private construction activities on public land in the City of Mound. Specifically, Subd. 3 regulates the continuation of enroachment(s) in an "as- is" condition. SITE INSPECTION City officials are encouraged to visit the subject site prior to the meeting, if appropriate. - 1623- CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Fire ChiefPederson No objections. Acting Police Chief McKinley No police issues. Public Works Director Skinner Continuation of privately-owned improvements in unimproved Hanover Road right-of-way is acceptable but applicant is advised that in the event construction activities and/or utility work takes place in subject area by the Public Works Department, the City will not be responsible for removal or relocation of the improvements nor shall the City be responsible for payment or reimbursement. Building Official Simoneau No comments. City Engineer Cameron None. Parks Director Fackler No objections. Review by POSAC and DCAC not needed. Comm. Dev. Director Smith Review by PC not needed. Retaining walls and staircase structures are allowable encroachment(s) within setback areas. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A site inspection was conducted by the Public Works Superintendent a few weeks ago who determined that the stair structure and retaining wall are in a location consistent with the settlement agreement which has been included as an attachment. Members of the City Council are advised that the issuance of the Public Lands Permit for the subject site will address a long-standing issue for the Building Inspections and Public Works Departments. 2 - 1624- The resolution, if approved, does not need to be recorded at Hennepin County as it is not required by state statute but recording was contemplated by the settlement agreement. Members of the City Council are advised that it is not usual and customary for Public Lands Permits to be recorded. The resolution will however be maintained in the Public Land Permit file system at City Hall which staff`believes meets the intent of the agreement. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approval of the Public Lands Permit at 3207 Devon Lane from Steven Camp subject to the following conditions: In the event any construction activities and/or utility work is required in the City- owned right-of-way of Hanover Road, the City shall not be responsible for relocation of the privately-owned improvements nor payment thereof. In the event the stairs and/or retaining wall improvements are relocated by the property owner, they shall be placed in an appropriate location outside of the street right-of-way. Maintenance of the private improvements shall be the responsibility of the applicant and all subsequent property owners. ATTACHMENTS Draft resolution · Public Lands Permit Application dated March 14, 2003 · Outline of Settlement Terms · Certificate of survey prepared by Frank R. Cardarelle 3 - 1625- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR STEPHEN CAMP AT 3207 DEVON LANE LOTS 18, 19, AND 20, BLOCK 10, DEVON WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Public Lands Permit to allow continued placement of a staircase structure and retaining wall(s) in the Hanover Road (unimproved) right-of-way at 3207 Devon Lane; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 320, requires City Council approval by a majority vote for construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park or commons or continuation of structures in an "as-in" condition; and WHEREAS, the staircase structure and retaining wall(s) were installed previously by the applicant without City permits; and WHEREAS, the continuation of the staircase structure and retaining wall(s) within nine (9) feet into the Hanover Road (unimproved) right-of-way was negotiated by the City Prosecuting Attorney in cooperation with City staff as part of the Outline of Settlement Terms in June 2002 for the property; and WHEREAS, the current location of the staircase structure and retaining walls is consistent with the Outline of Settlement Terms and was verified by the Public Works Superintendent; and WHEREAS, City staff has reviewed the application and determined that review by the Planning Commission, Parks and Open Space Commission and Docks and Commons Advisory Commission are not required; and WHEREAS, City staff is recommending approval of the Public Lands Permit subject to the following conditions: In the event any construction activities and/or utility work is required in the City-owned right-of-way of Hanover Road, the City shall not be responsible for relocation of the privately-owned improvements nor payment thereof. In the event the staircase and/or retaining wall improvements are relocated by the current or any future property owner, they shall be placed in an appropriate location outside of the street right-of-way. and; Maintenance of the private improvements shall be the responsibility of the applicant and all subsequent property owners. -1626- WHEREAS, the City Council considered this request at their meeting of April 22, 2003. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve the Public Lands Permit at 3207 Devon Lane as submitted by Stephen Camp. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember seconded by Councilmember and The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2003. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel - 1627- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com March 28, 2003 Steve Camp 3207 Devon Lane Mound, MN 55364 RE: Public Lands Permit Application Dear Mr. Camp: This letter is in regard to the Public Lands Application which was submitted on March 14, 2003. On behalf of the City of Mound, I wanted to inform you that it has been routed to the involved City Departments to determine if the work completed on the site and referenced on the survey from Frank Carderelle is consistent with the Outline of Settlement Terms" so as to allow processing of the Public Lands Permit by the City Council. For your review, a copy of the list has been included. In the event the terms of the settlement agreement have not been met the application will be rejected. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Community Development Director pritltod otl rocycled paper - 1628- Outline of Settlement Terms 1. Continue case no 01-098444 to 8:30 a.m. on June 17, 2002 for "appearance" at Ridgedale; 2. Camp will hire Carderelle or Other licensed surveyor to "shoot" auld stake out an emended line parallel to auld 9 feet from, measured at right angles l;rom, the southerly wall of the Camp residence; 3. Camp agreee to move his structures (concrete block wall, concrete block steps, boulder walls) behind (ie, north of) the 9 foot line before June 17i 2002; 4. Upon completion of the item//3 work, the City will dismiss case no. 01 098444; 5. Upon completion of the work, Camp's licensed surveyor will prepare an "as built" survey depicting the location of Camp's structures behind the 9 foot line, and Camp will apply for a Mound City Code section 320:00 permit for the encroachment of Camp's aforesaid structures behind the 9 foot line; 6. City staff will present Camp's said application to the City Council with the recommendation of the City's prosecutor and the City's public works superintendent that the contemplated Section 320:00 permit be approved by the City Council. 7. If said permit is approved by the City Council, said permit will be prepared in "recordable form" with the "as built" survey incorporated therein as an exhibit; (?? Burden to record same is on shoulders of Camp??) 8. The City waives payment of the usual Section 320:00 application fee; 9. Mr. Hertz wilt attempt to prepare a written stipulation within 10 days documenting the terms of this stipulation; 10. In the event of any conflict between this outline, Hertz's contemplated draft of stipulation, and the oral stipulation read into the record before Judge Danielson on 4/3/02, the oral stipulation will be controlling; 11. The city prosecutor dismisses court case no. 99-003275, without prejudice, and with the specific reservation of its right to commence new ordinance enforcement proceedings if new out side storeage violations occur; and the city has no objection to refunding any bail being held by the court on either of the above cases; and 12. If the City Council fails fbr any reason to approve the contemplated section 320:00 permit, the parties will report back to the court for trial assigmnent; 13. I don't think this was part of the record but Greg Skinner would like to be present during the staking of the 9 foot line. - 1629- CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 5364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 PUBLIC LANDS APPLICATION Application Fee: $200 (if project vetluation is $1,000 or more) Date Rece!.v~d ._.r__...~ 'Dock Commission Date ~[~,l City Council Date ~ DISTRIBUTION Check One Building Official DNR PublicWorks CO'NSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT - new construction. Parks Director MCWD NOTE: NO PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUSES OR OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND (City Code Section 320, Subd. 1). PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT - to allow repairs to an existing structure (City Code Section 320, Subd. 3). CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE - to allow an existing encroachment to remain in an "as is" condition (City Code Section 320, Subd. 3). LAND ALTERATION - change in shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, fill, etc. (City Code Section 320, Subd. 4). The structure or work you are requesting is an activity on publicly owned lands. Structures like boat houses, patios, sheds, etc. are all NONCONFORMING USES. It is the intent of the City to bring all these uses into conformance, which means that those structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. All permits are granted for a limited time and are non-transferable. Stairway construction must meet the State Building Code when the permit is for new construction, or a new permit is applied for due to a change in dock site holder. Please type or print legibly APPLICANT Name ,¢%~¢"~C~-~' Phone (H) ¢¢% ~Q~ (W) (M) ABUSING Address PROPER~- - LEGAL Lot ~ Block DESC. .. Subdivision. PID ~' Plat ZONING DISTRICT R-1 R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 Public Lands Permit Application Page 1 of 2 Revised 01/16/03 - 1630- pUBLIC Name ROPERTY Dock Site # Shoreline Type CONTRACTOR Name Address Phone (H). (W) .(M) PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS) DESCRIBE REQUEST & PURPOSE pplicant's Signature Date Public Lands Permit Application page 2 of 2 Revised 01/16/03 - 1631 - FRANK R. CARDARELLE (612) 941-3031 Survey For Land surveyor, Inc. 6440 Flying Cloud Drive Certificate Of Survey ..... Steve Kamp .... Book.. -~_344-- _ Page 3207 Devon Lane Mound, MN Land Surveyor Eden Praide, MN 55344 I~ll.lt" bland fax transmittal memo 7671 j,,,,s pege, ,. o > Scale: 1"=30' o Denotes Iron Mon. Found ,~,w~~-~-~-=-~-~-~-~e~-.,_.Ln%s 18; 19 ~.nd .$0, Block, ill0, ~on- 10th ...d,~...Septe~er .798 . . ~ ~~. ( ~ ~ ~' Frank R, Cardarelle State Reg. No~ 6508 - 1632- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: From Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director 4/17/2003 Erosion Control and Stormwater Permit(s) - Zero Gravity Skate Park Local Approval for Stormwater Pmiects As the City Council is aware, permitting responsibility for stormwater activities was transferred bom the MCWD to the City of Mound upon approval of the Mound Surface Water Management Plan in August 2002. Zero Gravity Skate Park Construction is expected to begin on the Zero Gravity Skate Park soon. Based on the MCWD Rule M criteria, the project requires a stormwater permit. Additionally, an erosion control (Rule B) permit is also required. Members of the City Council are advised that a Public Lands Permit and Wetland Alteration / Mitigation Plan were approved for the project in 2002. Notification Pursuant to the City's notification requirements as set forth in MCWD Rule A, a notice regarding the proposed project was sent to all property owners located within (600) feet on April 12, 2003. Additionally, a copy of the notice was also forwarded to the MCWD. Recommendation The grading and utility plan for the skate park was prepared by the City Engineer who is recommending approval of the stormwater and erosion control permits. - 1633- CITY OF MOUND MOUND CITY COUNCIL NOTICE OF STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROL PERMIT APPLICATION (MCWD RULES B & N) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council will consider a stormwater and erosion control permit application from Zero Gravity Skate Park on Tuesday, April 22, 2003 at 7:30 PM to allow construction of a skate park in the vicinity of Maywood Road which is located immediately north of City Hall. The meeting will be held in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN. You are being provided written notice as your property is located within (600) of the subject site. Information regarding the skate park project can be obtained by contacting Community Development Director Sarah Smith at 952-472-3190. Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Posted: April 9, 2003 - 1634- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Policy Requirements for Surface Water Management Plan Public Notification The City of Mound will require written notification to all property owners within (600) feet of any City permit request related to erosion control, floodplain alteration, wetlands impacts and stormwater management. - 1635- CITY OF MOUND CITY O F MOUND EROSION CONTROL AND STORMWATER PERMIT NO. 03-01 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota at its Tuesday, April 22, 2003 meeting, approved an erosion control and stormwater permit pursuant to the Mound Surface Water Management Plan and City Code for the Zero Gravity Skate Park to be constructed immediately north of City Hall, 5431 Maywoo. Road, Mound, MN subject to the following conditions: Any and/or all conditions from the City Engineer. Silt fence and erosion control measures shall be maintained at all times. By: Bonnie Ritter City Clerk Pat Meisel Mayor Applicants are advised that a copy of this permit must be posted on the construction site in a~ appropriate area visible for reviewing. - 1636- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PUBLIC LANDS REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: SUBJECT: " Mound Council, Docks and Commons Commission and Staff Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Jim Fackler, Parks Director May 8, 2002 Public Lands Permit Application - New Public Skate Park City of Mound / Zero Gravity Skate Park Task Force Maywood Avenue Right-of-Way (ROW) / City Hall Property (PID # 24- 117-24-21-0034 Construction of a Recreational Facility - Skateboarding Park REQUEST The applicant, the Zero Gravity Skate Park Task Force in cooperation with the City of Mound, is requesting an Public Lands Permit to allow construction of a new skate park in the Maywood Road right-of-way to be located between Mound City Hall on the south side and Wolner Field on the north side. Portions of the improvements also extend on to the City Hall property located at 5341 Maywood Road. The proposed skate park will be approximately 12,000 square feet and will feature a bowl, half pipe and a street course. It also includes portable restroom facilities, signage and refreshment/vending machines as well as areas for vehicle parking and viewing areas. A copy of the proposed site plan has been included a separate attachment. CITY CODE 320 - PRIVATE STRUCTURES AND PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON PUBLIC LAND City Code 320.01 regulates private structures and private construction activities on public land in the City of Mound. Specifically, Subd. 1 regulates new construction activities on public lands. PROJECT HISTORY The proposal originated from the Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative following the closing the Take Five Skate Park in 1999 at which time a petition signed by 400 individuals was submitted expressing support for a new skate park facility. - 1638- In July 2001, the City Council approved the Maywood Road site for use as a skate park following a recommendation from the Parks and Open Space Commission (POSAC) and budgeted $3000.00 for fiscal year 2002 for the project. Members of the City Council are advised that the new park will be owned and operated by the City of Mound. Members of the Task Force have been meeting for the past 1-2 years on the project and have capital fundraising activities underway with the goal of funding the project through monetary and in-kind donations. Details regarding the City's agreement with the Task Force regarding various project issues including, but not limited to, liability, project construction timeline, financial contributions, etc. are outlined in the Acceptance Agreement which will be presented by th.e City Attorney as a separate agenda item. PERMITTING ISSUES The proposal likely requires multiple permits from the City of Mound which include, but are not limited to, the following: 2. 3. 4. 5. Wetlands replacement plan. Street excavation permit Building permit Grading permit Stormwater permit Members of the City Council are advised that the City Engineer prepared the grading and wetands mitigation plan. It is anticipated that the stormwater permit process begin following transfer of the permitting responsibilities to the City of Mound from the MCWD. It is anticipated that any disturbed wetlands can be replaced on-site. Members that of the City Council are advised that the City Engineer has begun work on the wetlands replacement plan and review process. A copy of the grading and wetlands mitigation plan is in file on City Hall and will be made available upon request. LAND USE ISSUES The proposed project is to be located in the Maywood Road right-of-way. Portions of the park improvements also appear to extend on to the City Hall property. The proPerty located immediately north (Wolner Field) is zoned B-1 Central Business. The City Hall property is zoned R-1 Single-Family Residential. Public park and recreational facilities are permitted uses in both the B-1 and R-1 zoning districts. 2 - 1639- Until additional details are made available regarding the proposed improvements (ie. half-pipe, etc.), it is not yet known whether or not they are subject to setback requirements. Members of the City Council are advised that it is City staff' s understanding that play equipment has not been subject to setback requirements in the past. In the event the equipment is subject to setback requirements, a variance(s) could be needed and the application would requirement review and approval by the Planning Commission and Council. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION REVIEW The proposal, in concept, was reviewed previously by the Parks and Open Space Commission (POSAC) on July 24, 2001 meeting. At its April 11, 2002 meeting, the POSAC, made a recommendation that the Public Lands Permit application for the skate park project could be forwarded on to the City Council as it was reviewed previously and received favorable response. SITE INSPECTION City Officials and Board Members are encouraged to visit the subject site prior to the meeting, if appropriate. SKATE PARK TASK FORCE It is anticipated that representatives of the Task Force will be present at the meeting to explain details about the proposed project. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approval of the Public Lands Permit to allow construction of the Zero Gravity Skate Park in the Maywood Avenue right-of-way which also extend on to the City Hall property subject to the following conditions: 1. The Zero Gravity Skate Park Task Force obtains all required permits to allow construction of the project including the submittal of all information deemed necessary. 2. The City of Mound and Zero Gravity Skate Park Task Force enter into the Acceptance Agreement. 3 - 1640- Engineering ° Planning ° Surveying April 17, 2003 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364~1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound Post Office Demolition SAP 145-108-05 MFRA #12379 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Wickenhauser's Final Payment Request for the subject project. The amount of this request is $3,247.99. We have reviewed the project and find that the work was completed in general .accordance with the plans and specifications. It is our recommendation that the Contractor be paid in full for this project. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rpy cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director, City of Mound Enclosure s:Xmain:Wlou 12379:\CorrespondenceXhanson4-17 - 1641 - 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota o 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra, com - 1642- Z o F- z~Z 888888~8 8 88888888 8 oo~ooo 88888888 ::3 Z I'- I-- LU Il. d 121 uJ - 1644- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WFB: www.cityofmound.com April 17, 2003 TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL BONNIE RITTER LICENSE RENEWALS The following licenses are up for renewal or approval on April 30, 2003. The license year runs from May 1,2003 through April 30, 2003. All approvals are subject to application, proof of insurance, fee and other appropriate forms being received. RESTAURANT LICENSES Al & Alma's Supper Club American Legion Post 398 Domino's Pizza Happy Garden House of Moy Scotty B's Subway Sandwiches V.F.W. Post 5113 Carbone's Pizzeria Caribou Coffee Pat's Koffee Korner AMUSEMENT DEVICES American Legion Post 398 V.F.W. Post 5113 printed on recycled paper - 1645- MEMORANDUM Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. i'nll To: Kandis Hanson, City Manager From: Bruce Chamberlain, ASLA Date: April 18, 2003 Subject: CSAH 15/110 Streetscape - progress report The City Council approved schematic plans for the County Road 15/110 streetscape on December 10, 2002. The design team continues to refine project elements and we would like to provide an update to the City Council on April 22. Our review will be somewhat of a show and tell session including product samples for lighting and paving as well as review of benches and other elements already approved with the greenway project. In my project memo to you dated December 4, 2002, there were a number of project elements needing more in-depth analysis. Here is an update on those elements: Parking and landscaping at the Commerce Place intersection: A resolution to the parking question at Commerce Place has been reached. The roadway project will take a minimal impact approach to the Commerce Place parking rather than suggesting more extensive landscaping that would displace additional parking. Design steps are also being taken to cause the least disruption to the bank drive-thru (there will be no impact on the druve-thru's ability to function as it does today). Coordination with the Lost Lake Greenway: The small portion of the greenway project that cannot be constructed due to conflict with existing CSAH 15 will not be included in the CSAH 15 streetscape plans. Instead, the work will be packaged with the Auditors Road extension plans. Street lighting: Staff has received a proposal for street lighting installation and maintenance from Xcel Energy. We are still waiting for a private-sector competitive proposal. We will come back to the Council with a review and Staff recommendation on the subject within 30 days. 4. Stormwater ponds: At the City Council's direction, conceptual landscaping plans are being prepared for the stormwater ponds that flank the future CSAH 15. The 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 5540 i (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 - 1646- Memo- County Roads 15/110 Streetscape Update April 18, 2003 Page 2 o plans include stone walls, overlook areas, decorative railings and extensive landscaping. We will review preliminary plans at the upcoming Council meeting. Municipal parking on the True Value block: Mound Harbor Renaissance development group is reviewing the possibility of locating the park & ride facility on the True Value block. They will present their findings to the City Council prior to expiration of their current preliminary development agreement. Staff is assisting their review by providing background information and data that has been collected to date. Plans for the parking lot on the True Value block (whether it's a park & ride or exclusively a municipal lot) will be separate from the streetscape plans. We look forward to reviewing this information in more detail at next week's City Council meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 - 1647- CiTY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA PRE-SALE REPORT APRIL 22, 2003 Proposed Issues: 1. $2,750,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds 2. $1,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds 3. $1,320,000 General Obligation Water & Sewer Bonds Purpose: 1. Financing for public improvements assessed to MetroPlains ($600,000) and land acquisition related to CSAH 15 ($2,150,000) 2. Partial reimbursement for prior expenditures related to redevelopment of downtown area within TIF District 2-1. 3. Refunding of balance of 1993 Water and Sewer bonds to lower interest costs ($670,000) and financing of new water and sewer projects related to downtown development ($650,000 for new well and related improvements). Description: These three bond issues will provide financing principally related to downtown redevelopment. The Improvement Bonds include financing for a project that has been completed for the MetroPlains development including road, streetscape and utility improvements. MetroPlains has previously agreed to be assessed for 100% of these improvements. The balance of this project includes funding for one-half of the expected cost to acquire land for the CSAH 15 relocation and improvement. The balance of the cost will be paid by Hennepin County per a prior agreement. The balance of the project construction cost is estimated at $1.7 million and will be financed at a later time. The estimated cost for the debt service payment for the $2,150,000 CSAH 15 property acquisition is expected to be about $46 annually for a home with an assessed value of $200,000. The Tax Increment Bonds will reimburse the City for internal loans used to finance a variety of activities related to the downtown redevelopment. These activities included land acquisition, appraisals, inspections, environmental assessment, engineering, planning and financial services. The City has spent about $2.3 million to date and will be funding a reimbursement of $1,000,000. These funds will be used to increase the cash in the General Fund. This will not increase fund balance since the fund balance had included the internal loan as an asset ("due from other funds"). It is projected that the existing increment, minus the existing commitments to developers, will support issuance of about $600,000 of bonds without an increase in the general debt levy. The additional $400,000 of debt will increase the general debt levy by about $8.50 a home with an assessed value of $200,000. The Water and Sewer Bonds will refinance a the balance of a 1993 issue with lower interest rates saving an estimated $28,000 total over the remaining five years of the bonds. In addition $650,000 of new money will be issued to finance water well replacement and related improvements. The increase in debt service required to finance the new water improvements is expected to require an increase in water and sewer rates of about 3.5% over the term of the bonds. - 1648- Term/Call Feature: The Improvement Bonds will have a term of 20 years and will be callable in 2013 for bonds maturing on February 1, 2014 and thereafter. The Tax Increment Bonds will have a term of 22 years and will be callable in 2013 for bonds maturing on February 1, 2014 and thereafter. The Water and Sewer Bonds will have a term of 15 years and will be callable in 2009 for bonds maturing on February 1, 2010 and thereafter. Funding Sources: The Improvement Bonds will be funded by the assessments to MetroPlains and general debt levy, the TIF Bonds will be funded by the tax increment within the district and general debt levy. The estimated impact of the both issues is $54.50. The Water and Sewer bonds will be paid from water and sewer fees. Discussion Issues: All bonds included within this report are General Obligation Bonds backed by the full faith and credit of the City. This pledge helps improve the credit worthiness of the bonds and reduces interest costs. The pledge does mean that if any of the revenue expected to pay the debt service cost is not available that the city will increase the debt levy to pay the debt service. There is risk for this increase any time the full faith and credit pledge is provided. It should be noted that tax increment bonds are considered to be at greater risk to cover debt service because of potential for legislative changes in tax structure and market value changes. Also related the TIF bonds is the impact of partial reimbursement to the City's General Fund. The current fund balance of approximately $2 million includes an expected reimbursement of $1.3 million from TIF proceeds. Other funds are owed an additional $1 million. The "fund" balance does not reflect "cash" balances. In the case where funds are "owed" money the cash balance is actually less than the fund balance by the amount of funds due. To the extent that these funds are not reimbursed (or are likely to be reimbursed) than it may be necessary to reduce the fund balance to reflect this fact. This reduction in fund balance coupled with the decrease in fund balance to fund operations is likely to cause concern for potential investors and may trigger a credit downgrade. Schedule: Pre-Sale Review: Distribute Official Statement: Conference with Rating Agency: Bond Sale: Estimated Closing Date: April 22, 2003 May 1, 2003 Week of May 5, 2003 May 13, 2003 June 11, 2003 Attachments: Sources and Uses of Funds Proposed Debt Service Schedule Bond Buyer Index Resolution authorizing Ehlers to proceed with bond sale Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - 1649- Ehlers Contacts: Financial Advisors: Bond Analysts: Bond Sale Coordinator: Jim Prosser, Sid Inman, Stacie Kvilvang Diana Lockard (651) 697-8534 Debbie Holmes (651) 697-8536 Connie Kuck (651) 697-8527 The Official Statement for this financing will be mailed to the Council Members at their home address for review prior to the sale date. Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - 1650- Resolution No. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution Providing for the Sale of $2,750,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2003A $1,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2003B $1~20,000 General Obligation Water & Sewer Bonds, Series 2003C WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $2,750,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2003A (the "Series 2003A Bonds"), to finance public improvements assessed to MetroPlains and land acquisition related to CSAH 15 in the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessat3, and expedient to issue the City's $1,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2003B (the "Series 2003 Bonds "), to finance partial reimbursement for prior expenditures related to TIF District 2-1 in the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $1,320,000 General Obligation Water & Sewer Bonds, Series 2003 C(the "Series 2003C Bonds"), to refund the 1993 Water and Sewer bonds and to finance water and sewer projects related to downtown development in the City; and WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent financial advisor for the Series 2003A Bonds, Series 2003B Bonds and the Series 2003C Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of the Series 2003A Bonds, Series 2003B Bonds and the Series 2003C Bonds. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at on , for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Series 2003A Bonds, Series 2003B Bonds and the Series 2003C Bonds. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Series 2003A Bonds, Series 2003B Bonds and the Series 2003C Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following Council Members voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this ~ day of ,2003. City Clerk - 1651 - CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA I='RE-~ALE REPORT APRIL 22, 2003 Revised Proposed Issues: 1. $3,300,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds 2. $1,030,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds 3. $1,360,000 General Obligation Water & Sewer Bonds Purpose: 1. Financing for public improvements assessed to MetroPlains ($600,000), 2003 Street Reconstruction ($400,000) and land acquisition related to CSAH 15 ($2,150,000). Partial reimbursement for prior expenditures related to redevelopment of downtown area within TIF District 2-1. Refunding of balance of 1993 Water and Sewer bonds to lower interest costs ($670,000) and financing of new water and sewer projects related to downtown development ($650,000 for new well and related improvements). Description: These three bond issues will provide financing principally related to downtown redevelopment. The Improvement Bonds include financing for a project that has been completed for the MetroPlains development including road, streetscape and utility improvements. MetroPlains has previously agreed to be assessed for 100% of these improvements. The 2003 Road Reconstruction Improvement will be assessed to property owners (67%) and the balance paid from debt levy. The balance of this project includes funding for one-half of the expected cost to acquire land for the CSAH 15 relocation and improvement. The balance of the cost will be paid by Hennepin County per a prior agreement. The balance of the project construction cost is estimated at $1.7 million and will be financed at a later time. The estimated cost for the debt service payment for the $2,150,000 CSAH 15 property acquisition is expected to be about $46 annually for a home with an assessed value of $200,000. The Tax Increment Bonds will reimburse the City for internal loans used to finance a variety of activities related to the downtown redevelopment. These activities included land acquisition, appraisals, inspections, environmental assessment, engineering, planning and financial services. The Cityhas spent about $2.3 million to date and will be funding a reimbursement of $1,000,000. These funds will be used to increase the cash in the General Fund. This will not increase fund balance since the fund balance had included the internal loan as an asset ("due from other funds"). It is projected that the existing increment, minus the existing commitments to developers, will support issuance of about $600,000 of bonds without an increase in the general debt levy. The additional $400,000 of debt will increase the general debt levy by about $8.50 a home with an assessed value of $200,000. The Water and Sewer Bonds will refinance a the balance of a 1993 issue with lower interest rates saving an estimated $28,000 total over the remaining five years of the bonds. In addition $650,000 of new money will be issued to finance water well replacement and related improvements. The increase in debt service required to finance the new water improvements is expected to require an increase in water and sewer rates of about 3.5% over the term of the bonds. Term/Call Feature: The Improvement Bonds will have a term of 20 years and will be callable in 2013 for bonds maturing on February 1, 2014 and thereafter. The Tax Increment Bonds will have a term of 22 years and will be callable in 2013 for bonds maturing on February 1, 2014 and thereafter. The Water and Sewer Bonds will have a term of 15 years and will be callable in 2009 for bonds maturing on February 1, 2010 and thereafter. Funding Sources: The Improvement Bonds will be funded by the assessments and general debt levy, the TIF Bonds will be funded by the tax increment within the district and general debt levy. The estimated impact of the both issues is $59. The Water and Sewer bonds will be paid from water and sewer fees. Discussion Issues: All bonds included within this report are General Obligation Bonds backed by the full faith and credit of the City. This pledge helps improve the credit worthiness of the bonds and reduces interest costs. The pledge does mean that if any of the revenue expected to pay the debt service cost is not available that the city will increase the debt levy to pay the debt service. There is risk for this increase any time the full faith and credit pledge is provided. It should be noted that tax increment bonds are considered to be at greater risk to cover debt service because of potential for legislative changes in tax structure and market value changes. Also related the TIF bonds is the impact of partial reimbursement to the City's General Fund. The current fund balance of approximately $2 million includes an expected reimbursement of $1.3 million from TIF proceeds. Other funds are owed an additional $1 million. The "fund" balance does not reflect "cash" balances. In the case where funds are "owed" money the cash balance is actually less than the fund balance by the amount of funds due. To the extent that these funds are not reimbursed (or are likely to be reimbursed) than it may be necessary to reduce the fund balance to reflect this fact. This reduction in fund balance coupled with the decrease in fund balance to fund operations is likely to cause concern for potential investors and may trigger a credit downgrade. Schedule: Pre-Sale Review: Distribute Official Statement: Conference with Rating Agency: Bond Sale: Estimated Closing Date: April 22, 2003 May 1, 2003 Week of May 5, 2003 May 13, 2003 June 11, 2003 Attachments: Sources and Uses of Funds Proposed Debt Service Schedule Bond Buyer Index Resolution authorizing Ehlers to proceed with bond sale Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Ehlers Contacts: Financial Advisors: Bond Analysts: Bond Sale Coordinator: Jim Prosser, Sid Inman, Stacie Kvilvang Diana Lockard (651) 697-8534 Debbie Holmes (651) 697-8536 Connie Kuck (651) 697-8527 The Official Statement for this financing will be mailed to the Council Members at their home address for review prior to the sale date. Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Resolution No. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution Providing for the Sale of $3,300,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2003A $1,030,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2003B $1,360,000 General Obligation Water & Sewer Bonds, Series 2003C WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $3,300,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2003A (the "Series 2003A Bonds"), to finance public improvements assessed to MetroPlains and land acquisition related to CSAH 15 in the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $1,030,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2003B (the "Series 2003 Bonds "), to finance partial reimbursement for prior expenditures related to TIF District 2-1 in the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $1,360,000 General Obligation Water & Sewer Bonds, Series 2003C(the "Series 2003C Bonds"), to refund the 1993 Water and Sewer bonds and to f'mance water and sewer projects related to downtown development in the City; and WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ("Ehlers"), as its independent financial advisor for the Series 2003A Bonds, Series 2003B Bonds and the Series 2003C Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of the Series 2003A Bonds, Series 2003B Bonds and the Series 2003C Bonds. 2. Meeting; Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:30 pm on May 13, 2003 for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Series 2003A Bonds, Series 2003B Bonds and the Series 2003C Bonds. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Series 2003A Bonds, Series 2003B Bonds and the Series 2003C Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following Council Members voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this __ day of ,2003. City Clerk CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TAX INCREMENT PLEDGE AGREEMENT WITH THE MOUND HRA RELATING TO GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 2003 WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "HRA") and the City have established Development District No. 1 (the "Project Area"), and approved a Plan (the "Project Plan") for the Project Area; and WHEREAS, within the Project Area, the HRA and City have established Tax Increment Financing District No. 2-1 (the "TIF District"); and WHEREAS, the HRA has previously entered into and paid the cost of contracts for various redevelopment activities within and related to the TIF District in order to carry out the objectives of the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District and the Development Program for the Project Area; and increment bonds; and WHEREAS, as contemplated in prior resolutions of the City Council, including Resolution No. 00-58 approved May 23, 2000, the City has stated its intent to reimburse costs related to the TIF District through issuance of bonds; and WHEREAS, the HRA and City have proposed that the City issue general obligation bonds in the maximum principal amount of $2,300,000 (the "Series 2003 TIF Bonds") in order to reimburse various costs incurred by the City and/or HRA in connection with the TIF District; and WHEREAS, the HRA has agreed to pledge certain tax increment revenues to the City for the principal and interest on the Series 2003 TIF Bonds; and WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City a form of Tax Increment Pledge Agreement Series 2003 between the HRA and the City (the "Pledge Agreement"), providing for issuance of the Series 2003 TIF Bonds, the use of proceeds, and the pledge of certain tax increments from the TIF District to payment of principal and interest on the Series 2003 TIF Bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Upon awarding of the sale of any series of Series 2003 TIF Bonds, the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute and deliver the Pledge Agreement substantially in the form on file with the City, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction that are approved by the Mayor and City Manager, whose execution will be conclusive evidence of their approval. 2. This resolution shall be effective as of the date hereof. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota this 22nd day of April, 2003. Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk SJB-230641 vl 2 MU200-112 TAX INCREMENT PLEDGE AGREEMENT SERIES 2003 by and between CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA and THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on or as of the __ day of ,2003, by and between the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "City"), and The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "HRA"). WHEREAS, the HRA has established Development District No. 1 (the "Project Area"), and approved a Plan (the "Project Plan") for the Project Area; and WHEREAS, within the Project Area, the HRA and City have established Tax Increment Financing District No. 2-1 (the "TIF District"); and WHEREAS, the HRA and/or City have previously entered into and paid the cost of contracts for various redevelopment activities within and related to the TIF District in order to carry out the objectives of the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District and the Development Program for the Project Area; and WHEREAS, as contemplated in prior resolutions of the City Council, including Resolution No. 00-58 approved May 23, 2000, the City has stated its intent to reimburse costs related to the TIF District through issuance of bonds; and WHEREAS, the HRA and City have proposed that the City issue general obligation bonds in the maximum principal amount of $2,300,000 (the "Series 2003 TIF Bonds") in order to reimburse various costs incurred by the City and/or HRA in connection with the TIF District; and WHEREAS, the HRA has agreed to pledge certain tax increments from the TIF District to the City for the principal and interest on the Series 2003 TIF Bonds; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, Subdivision 2, any agreement to pledge tax increment revenues must be made by written agreement by and between the HRA and the City and must be filed with the Taxpayer Services Division Manager of Hennepin County; NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the HRA mutually agree to the following: (1) SJB-230634vl MU200-112 The City will issue and sell the Series 2003 TIF Bonds. The Series 2003 TIF Bonds may issued in one or more series, and in the amount determined by the City, up to a maximum of $2,300,000. To the extent possible as determined by bond counsel, (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Series 2003 TIF Bonds will be issued on a tax-exempt basis, but the City and HRA agree and understand that some or all of the Series 2003 T~ Bonds may be issued as taxable bonds. The HRA hereby pledges to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds all Available Tax Increment. The term "Available Tax Increment" means the tax increments received by the HRA from the TW District as of any payment date on the Series 2003 TIF Bonds, less (a) 10% of the tax increments received in the prior six-month period, and less (b) the amount needed on that payment date to pay any bonds, notes or contracts that were entered into before the date of this agreement and are secured in whole or in part with tax increments from TIF District. The HRA estimates that Available Tax Increment will be sufficient to pay at least 20% of the total principal and interest on the Series 2003 TIF Bonds. The City agrees and understands that upon issuance of any Series 2003 TIF Bonds, the City will levy property taxes in the amount necessary, together with Available Tax Increment, to pay 105% of the principal and interest of the Series 2003 TIF Bonds. Not less than three (3) business days prior to each debt service payment date for the Bonds, there shall be transferred from the accounts for the TIF District to the Debt Service Fund maintained by the City for the payment of the Bonds, all Available Tax Increment. Any Available Tax Increments in excess of 105% of the principal and interest due with respect to the Bonds on any payment date may be retained by the HRA in the tax increment account for the TIF District and applied to any public redevelopment costs of the TIF District or Project Area in accordance with law. Without regard to anything in this Agreement to the contrary, Available Tax Increment shall be available to pay, on a parity basis, principal of and interest on both the Bonds and any other obligations issued by the City, HRA or any other public body after the date of this Agreement, to finance public redevelopment costs paid or incurred by the HRA in connection with the TIF District. When all principal and interest on the Bonds and other obligations issued to finance the public redevelopment costs of the TIF District have been paid, and the City has been reimbursed from collections of tax increment from the TIF District used to pay principal of and interest on the Bonds, then the HRA shall report such fact to the City Council of the City and the HRA shall submit a final statement of such payments. An executed copy of this Agreement shall be filed with the Taxpayer Service Division Manager of County pursuant to the requirement contained in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, Subdivision 2. SJB-230634vl MU200-112 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the HRA have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on their behalf and their seals to be hereunto affixed and such signatures and seals to be attested, as of the day and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA By City Clerk Mayor (SEAL) SJB-230634vl MU200-112 ATTEST: THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA Secretary By Chair (SEAL) SJB-230634vl MU200-112 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER'S CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned Taxpayer Services Division Manager of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certify t hat a T ax Increment P ledge Agreement S eries 2 003 by and between the City of Mound, Minnesota and the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority dated , 2003, relating to the City's $ General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2003 been filed in my office. WITNESS my hand and official seal this __ day of ., 2003. (SEAL) Taxpayer Services Division Manager's Hennepin County, Minnesota By. Deputy SJB-230634vl MU200-112 DRAFT 3/25/03 AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into effective this __ day of ,2003 by and between THE CITY OF MOUND, the first party, hereinafter called or referred to as the City, and McCOMBS FRANK ROOS 'ASSOCIATES, INC., second party, hereinafter called or referred to as the Consultant. WITNESSETH, that, WHEREAS, the City wishes to engage the Consultant to provide professional engineering services as are fully described in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has submitted a proposal that has been accepted by the City Council for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: Engagement. The City hereby retains the Consultant and the Consultant hereby agrees to such retainer to perform the professional engineering services described in the attached Exhibit A on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Scope of Services. During the term hereof, the Consultant shall perform the services set forth and described in Exhibit A. o Additional Services. The Consultant will perform other professional services as directed by the City Administrator or City Council. The Consultant will provide the City with an estimated services amount prior to performing additional services. Consultant's Representation. The Consultant hereby represents and warrants that it or its employees and agents have all necessary licenses to perform the services and are qualified to do so. Enforceability. If any provision contained herein shall be deemed or declared unenforceable, invalid or void, the same shall not impair any of the other provisions contained herein which shall be enforced in accordance with their respective terms. o Applicable Law. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be governed by the interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Termination and Suspension. Each party has the right to terminate this contract upon a 30-day written notice. If any work performed by the Consultant is abandoned or suspended by the City in whole or in part, and if the consultant has complied with all the JBD-229168vl MU220-2 -1652- terms of this contract, the Consultant shall be paid for services performed, to the date of receipt of written notice from the City of such abandonment or suspension, together with any terminal expenses resulting therefrom as agreed to between the City and Consultant. o Ownership of Documents. The completed original plan, drawings, calculations and text shall become the property of the Consultant. With respect to any work in progress at the time of termination, the Consultant shall provide the City with reproducible copies of any documents already completed at the time of termination necessary for completion of said work at no additional expense to the City. o Summary_ of Fees. The Consultant will be compensated on an hourly basis for the services described in Exhibit A. The Consultant will be compensated on the basis of the houriy rates of personnel performing the Services with other direct expenses (i. e., delivery charges, typing, reproduction, printing, photographs and mileage)at cost. Exhibit B is the hourly rate schedule. The City intends to finance the payment of the Fees through the proceeds of general obligation bonds to be issued to pay such fees and other costs and expenses. For additional services performed as directed by the City, the Consultant will be compensated on the basis of the hourly rates of personnel performing the Services with other direct expenses (i. e., delivery charges, typing, reproduction, printing, photographs and mileage)at cost. Exhibit B is the hourly rate schedule. 10. Progress Pa_wnents. Once each month the City shall pay the Consultant upon submission of invoices for professional services performed under this Agreement in preparation to services performed during the period. All invoices shall be in a form and submitted on a time schedule approved by the City. 11. Insurance. The Consultant shall secure and maintain insurance in accordance with the attached Exhibit C as will protect them from claims under the Worker's Compensation Act and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage and professional liability which may arise from the performance of their services under this Agreement. The Consultant shall, name the City as Additional Insured. 12. Arbitration. The parties shall arbitrate all disputes under this Agreement in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. This Agreement shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law and judgment upon the award rendered may be entered in the court of the forum, state or federal, having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrators shall be a condition precedent to the right of any legal action, but shall not be considered as precluding an appeal to the courts by the City or Consultant to the arbitrators decision. 13. Indemnification. Consultant agrees to indemnify and defend the City against claims or liabilities arising out of, or relating to the negligence or intentional misconduct of the Consultant, and the City agrees to indemnify the Consultant against claims or liabilities arising out of, or relating to negligence or intentional misconduct of the City. JBD-229168v 1 MU220-2 - 1653- 14. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement and all of the covenants thereof shall insure to the benefit of and be binding upon the City and the Consultant respectively and his partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives. Neither the City nor the Consultant shall have the right to assign, transfer or sublet its interest or obligations hereunder without written consent of the other party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made and executed this Agreement upon the terms and conditions above stated on the day and year first above written. CITY OF MOUND McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. By: By: Jeffrey J. Roos Its: Its: President JBD-229168vl MU220-2 3 - 1654- EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES General Services Technical Reviews of all Community Development related activities Technical Representation to other government agencies Technical Assistance to Council and Commissioners Technical Support to Administrative staff Project Services Research and preparation of preliminary reports for public improvement projects and/or issues related to the Mound infrastructure systems Presentation of Technical Reports at public meetings Preparation of final plans, specifications, and bid documents for infrastructure improvement projects. Project Administration, overseeing, and staking of construction activities on infrastructure improvement projects Warranty inspection and final acceptance reports on infrastructure improvement projects Preparation of assessment rates for special assessment projects JBD-229165vl MU220-2 A-1 - 1655- AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into effective this __ day of ,2003 by and between T HE CITY O F MOUND, t he first p arty, hereinafter called o r referred t o a s t he City, and McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC., second party, hereinafter called or referred to as the Consultant. WITNESSETH, that, WHEREAS, the City wishes to engage the Consultant to provide professional engineering services as are fully described in the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has submitted a proposal that has been accepted by the City Council for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto 'agree as follows: Engagement. The City hereby retains the Consultant and the Consultant hereby agrees to such retainer to perform the professional engineering services described in the attached Exhibit A on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Scope of Services. During the term hereof, the Consultant shall perform the services set forth and described in Exhibit A. Additional Services. The Consultant will perform other professional services as directed by the City Administrator or City Council. The Consultant will provide the City with an estimated services amount prior to performing additional services. Consultant's Representation. The Consultant hereby represents and warrants that it or its employees and agents have all necessary licenses to perform the services and are qualified to do so. Enforceability. If any provision contained herein shall be deemed or declared unenforceable, invalid or void, the same shall not impair any of the other provisions contained herein which shall be enforced in accordance with their respective terms. o Applicable Law. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be governed by the interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. Termination and Suspension. Each party has the right to terminate this contract upon a 30-day written notice. If any work performed by the Consultant is abandoned or suspended by the City in whole or in part, and if the consultant has complied with all the terms of this contract, the Consultant shall be paid for services performed, to the date of JBD-229168v3 MU220-2 10. 11. 12. 13. receipt of written notice from the City of such abandonment or suspension, together with any terminal expenses resulting therefrom as agreed to between the City and Consultant. Ownership of Documents. The completed original plan, drawings, calculations and text shall become the property of the Consultant. With respect to any work in progress at the time of termination, the Consultant shall provide the City with reproducible copies of any documents already completed at the time of termination necessary for completion of said work at no additional expense to the City. Summary of Fees. The Consultant will be compensated on an hourly basis for the services described in Exhibit A. The Consultant will be compensated on the basis of the hourly rates of personnel performing the Services with other direct expenses (i. e., delivery charges, typing, reproduction, printing, photographs and mileage)at cost. Exhibit B is the hourly rate schedule. The City intends to finance the payment of the Fees through the proceeds of general obligation bonds to be issued to pay such fees and other costs and expenses. For additional services performed as directed by the City, the Consultant will be compensated on the basis of the hourly rates of personnel performing the Services with other direct expenses (i. e., delivery charges, typing, reproduction, printing, photographs and mileage)at cost. Exhibit B is the hourly rate schedule. Progress Pa_wnents. Once each month the City shall pay the Consultant upon submission of invoices for professional services performed under this Agreement in preparation to services performed during the period. All invoices shall be in a form and submitted on a time schedule approved by the City. Insurance. The Consultant shall secure and maintain insurance in accordance with the attached Exhibit C as will protect them from claims under the Worker's Compensation Act and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage and professional liability which may arise from the performance of their services under this Agreement. The Consultant shall name the City as Additional Insured. Arbitration. The parties shall arbitrate all disputes under this Agreement in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. This Agreement shall be specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law and judgment upon the award rendered may be entered in the court of the forum, state or federal, having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrators shall be a condition precedent to the right of any legal action, but shall not be considered as precluding an appeal to the courts by the City or Consultant to the arbitrators decision. Indemnification. Consultant agrees to indemnify and defend the City against claims or liabilities a rising o ut o f, o r r elating t o t he negligence o r intentional misconduct o f t he Consultant, and the City agrees to indemnify the Consultant against claims or liabilities arising out of, or relating to negligence or intentional misconduct of the City. JBD-229168v3 MU220-2 14. Successors and Assi~ms. This Agreement and all of the covenants thereof shall insure to the benefit of and be binding upon the City and the Consultant respectively and his partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives. Neither the City nor the Consultant shall have the right to assign, transfer or sublet its interest or obligations hereunder without written consent of the other party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made and executed this Agreement upon the terms and conditions above stated on the day and year first above written. CITY OF MOUND McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. By: By: Jeffrey J. Roos Its: Its: President JBD-229168v3 MU220-2 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES Projects _-_ 2003 Street Reconstruction Improvement Proiect 2003 Water and Sewer Improvement Proiects, including, without limitation: Construction of Well #8, Westedge watermain, County Highway 15 watermain improvements. · 2003 Improvement prqjects relating to County Highway 15. General Services Relating to Prqjects Technical Reviews of all Community Development related activities Technical Representation to other government agencies Technical Assistance to Council and Commissioners Technical Support to Administrative staff Project Services Research and preparation of preliminary reports for public improvement projects and/or issues related to the Mound infrastructure systems Presentation of Technical Reports at public meetings Preparation of final plans, specifications, and bid documents for infrastructure improvement projects. Project Administration, overseeing, and staking of construction activities on infrastructure improvement projects Warranty inspection and final acceptance reports on infrastructure improvement projects Preparation of assessment rates for special assessment projects JBD-229168vl MU220-2 A-1 EXHIBIT B HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE The hourly charges are in the following ranges, depending on the associates involved: Principal Engineer/Land Surveyor/Planner $ 140.00 - 160.00/Hour Registered Engineer/Land Surveyor $ 84.00 - 13 0.00/Hour Supervisory and Senior Technician $ 103.00/Hour Certified Planner $ 70.00 - 102.00/Hour Landscape Architect $ 71.00- 105.00/Hour Engineer $ 70.00 - 85.00/Hour Soil Scientist $ 70.00 - 90.00/Hour Technicians/Draftsperson $ 65.00 - 78.00/Hour Surveyor (Crew Chief') $ 81.00/Hour Survey Technicians $ 52.00 - 70.00/Hour Inspectors $ 70.00 - 75.00/Hour 2-Man Survey Crew $ 142.00/Hour 3-Man Survey Crew $ 164.00/Hour Clerical $ 44.00 - 60.00/Hour ** Subject to annual adjustment. JBD-229168vl MU220-2 B~I EXHIBIT C REQUIRED INSURANCE COVERAGES INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS MtCttITECTI , ENGINEER AND LAND gURVEVOR (CONgULTANT) CONTRACT AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The Consultant s hall not commence work under t his contract, n or allow a ny subcontractor t o commence work until all insurance required under the contract documents has been obtained and evidence of such insurance, in form and content satisfactory to the City, has been received by the City[s Office of Risk Management. Said insurance shall be sufficient so as to protect the City's interests against any and all claims arising from, or relating to, any work performed by the Consultant. During the term of this contract, the Consultant shall maintain such insurance as will protect the Consultant and the City from claims as set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Consultant's operations under the contract, whether such operations be by Consultant or by a subcontractor or sub-subcontractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them, or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be held liable: (a) For claims arising under any Worker's Compensation, Employers Liability, or any similar employee benefit. (b) For claims because of bodily injury, sickness, disease, or death of any person or persons other than Consultant's employees, and for claims because of damage to or destruction of property of others resulting therefrom, including loss of use thereof. (c) For claims because of errors and/or omissions as it relates to the Architect's and/or the Engineer's professional liability and performance. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than th,-f~P~4~is customary for such activities as respects subparagraph (a) above+. Consultant will provide the City with evidence of such coverages within ten days following the execution of this Agreement. JBD-229168vl MU220-2 C-1 JBD-229168v1 MU220-2 C-2 The insurance referred to in subparagraph (b)above shall be written on Occurrence form under the Commercial General, and Comprehensive Automobile Liability policy forms, including coverage for all owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles. The Consultant may at their option, provide the limits of liability as set out above by a combination of the above described policy forms and an Umbrella Excess Liability policy. as respects sum (c)above: (1)$25,000 $250,000 Each Claim $250,000 Aggregate (1)Deductible or Self-Insurance, Each Claim All responsibility for payment of any sums resulting from any deductible provision, or self- insured retention conditions of the policy or policies shall remain with the Consultant. The City may require documents to contractually affirm such deductible or self-insured retention. It is a condition of the contract that the policy or policies waive an as a defense in any action brought against the insured or any other party to the contract. Approval of the insurance by the City shall not in any way relieve or decrease the liability of the Consultant hereunder, and it is expressly understood that the City does not in any way represent that the above specified insurance or limits of liability are sufficient or adequate to protect the Consultant's interests or liabilities. The insured shall submit evidence of insurance on the Standard Certificate form, or other form as may be required by the City. If any policy of insurance is canceled or materially adversely altered, the consultant shall file a new Certificate of Insurance or this contract shall become null and void. Certificates for general liability policies must show that the City is one of the parties insured by the respective policies. JBD-229168vl MU220-2 C-3 Document comparison done by DeltaView on 22, 2003 11:06:41 Document 1 )cdocs://docsopen/229168/2 Document 2 )cdocs://docsopen/229168/3 Rendering set Standard no color Insertion Moved to Style change Format change Inserted cell Deleted cell Moved cell Split/Merged cell Padding cell Count Insertions 11 Deletions 23 Moved from 0 Vloved to 0 Style change 0 =ormat changed 0 Total changes 34 EXHIBIT B HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE The hourly charges are in the following ranges, depending on the associates involved: Principal Engineer/Land Surveyor/Planner Registered Engineer/Land Surveyor Supervisory and Senior Technician Certified Planner Landscape Architect Engineer Soil Scientist Technicians/Draftsperson Surveyor (Crew Chief) Survey Technicians Inspectors 2-Man Survey Crew 3-Man Survey Crew Clerical $ 140.00- 160.00/Hour $ 84.00- 130.00fltour $ 103.00/Hour $ 70.00- 102.00/Hour $ 71.00- 105.00/Hour $ 70.00 - 85.00/Hour $ 70.00 - 90.00/Hour $ 65.00 - 78.00/Hour $ 81.00/Hour $ 52.00 - 70.00/Hour $ 70.00 - 75.00/Hour $ 142.00/Hour $ 164.00/Hour $ 44.00 - 60.00/Hour ** Subject to annual adjustment. JBD-229168vl MU220-2 B-1 -1656- EXHIBIT C REQUIRED INSURANCE COVERAGES INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ARCHITECT'S, ENGINEER'S AND LAND SURVEYOR'S (CONSULTANT) CONTRACT AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The Consultant shall not commence work under this contract, nor allow any subcontractor to commence work until all insurance required under the contract documents has been obtained and evidence of such insurance, in form and content satisfactory to the City, has been received by the City[s Office of Risk Management. Said insurance shall be sufficient so as to protect the City's interests against any and all claims arising from, or relating to, any work performed by the Consultant. During the term of this contract, the Consultant shall maintain such insurance as will protect the Consultant and the City from claims as set forth below which may arise out of or result from the Consultant's operations under the contract, whether such operations be by Consultant or by a subcontractor or sub-subcontractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them, or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be held liable: (a) For claims arising under any Worker's Compensation, Employers Liability, or any similar employee benefit. (b) For claims because of bodily injury, sickness, disease, or death of any person or persons other than Consultant's employees, and for claims because of damage to or destruction of property of others resulting therefrom, including loss of use thereof. (c) For claims because of errors and/or omissions as it relates to the Architect's and/or the Engineer's professional liability and performance. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than the following as respects subparagraph (a) above: JBD-229168v 1 MU220-2 C-1 - 1657- Worker's Compensation Employers Liability and as respects subparagraph (b) above: General Liability: Bodily Injury Property Damage Statutory Automobile: Bodily Injury and Property Damage Statutory $ $ $ $ $ The insurance referred to in subparagraph (b)above shall be written on Occurrence form under the Commercial General, and Comprehensive Automobile Liability policy forms, including coverage for all owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles. The Consultant may at their option, provide the limits of liability as set out above by a combination of the above described policy forms and an Umbrella Excess Liability policy. as respects sum (c)above: (1)$25,000 $250,000 Each Claim $250,000 Aggregate (1)Deductible or Self-Insurance, Each Claim All responsibility for payment of any sums resulting from any deductible provision, or self- insured retention conditions of the policy or policies shall remain with the Consultant. The City may require documents to contractually affirm such deductible or self-insured retention. It is a condition of the contract that the policy or policies waive an as a defense in any action brought against the insured or any other party to the contract. All evidence of required insurance shall be submitted prior to the execution of the contract. The entire contract shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. Approval of the insurance by the City shall not in any way relieve or decrease the liability of the Consultant hereunder, and it is expressly understood that the City does not in any way represent that the above specified insurance or limits of liability are sufficient or adequate to protect the Consultant's interests or liabilities. The insured shall submit evidence of insurance on the Standard Certificate form, or other form as may be required by the City. If any policy of insurance is canceled or materially adversely altered, the consultant shall file a new Certificate of Insurance or this contract shall become null and void. Certificates for general liability policies must show that the City is one of the parties insured by the respective policies. JBD-229168vl MU220-2 C-2 - 1658- ,-2003 WED 03:01 PM H,R, ANDERSON & ASSOC FRX NO, 7+ P,. 02 _A.C/.q_R,D.,. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE PRODUCER (:9~Z) 893-1933 FAX (:95Z:) 893-1B19 THIS Ct;A JiPICATE IS ISSUED AS A MAYTER OF tNFOR'MA'I:ION H. Robert Anderson & Assoc,, Thc, ONLYAND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 4GO0 We~t 77th Street Suite 105 F£Hna, MN S5435 ]5050 23rd Avenue North P~y~u~h~ ~N 55447 COVERAGES ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE .IN_~?~A'... United States F,~del~ty. & Guaranty ~SU~:~D St, Paul F~re & Marine Zns. Co N~C Security Zns. Co, of Hartford .................. iNSUR~'R D: TH~ I~LIC, lg,~ OF tN.~URANCE LIGTffD BE'LOW ~VE ~EEN ~SUED TO THE IN~RED ~D A80~ F~RTHE~0LICY PERIOD'INDICATED. NO~THST~DING ANY REQUIR~4ENT, ] ERM OR CONDmON OF ANY CONTACT OR O~ IER DOCU~NT WITtl RE~PE~ TO WHICH THIS G~RTI~CAT~ ~Y BE I~U~D OR ~Y PERTNN THE INSLI~CE ~FOROED BY THE POLICIES DESCR D'ED HEREIN I~ SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERM~ EXCLU=IONS AND ~NDITIONS OF SUCH POL CICa, AGGI~t, GATE LI~TS ~H~N ~Y HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PA O CLNMS. ~ POLICY ~P=~ H~ POLICYEXPI~TION ~ ~YP~ OF ~N~U~AN~ POLICY NUMBER [~AY~ (M~DO~ DATE ~M~O~t UMIT~ G~eRA~ [tA~ILITY ~KO1041631 01/15/2003 O1/15/2004 r EACH O~UREENGE I 1,0~, OO0 A P~ONAL & ADV W JURY S 1 p 000 t DOG n;~l. AOOnFOA~ LIMff APpLIFS POE PRO~S - ~MP/Oa AGO S 2,000, O00 A~JOMOOILE~I~Y ~A01041621 . O1/15/Z00~ O1/15/2004' COMDiNcD~iNOLCLiMff ~ L ~FD A~O9 oO~LY INdU~Y .... 80DILY ~JUEY . .m A~o ONLY: AGO $ A S.i~Cuu(.u,.~~ m~EN. AGGR: . - ' ; , 2,~00,OO0 ~4flLOY~I<S' LIAi~IL~Y E L ~,e;Ae;- EA ;~??~ ~ 1,000, OO0 I'rofess~ona~m';~ ' L;abil ity ~EEO702135 OZ/Z~/ZO03 01/25/2004 Each Claim/ $1,000,O00 C Anhual ' Aggregate S2,000, O00 ~10 days eot~ce for cancellation ~f reason ~s'for .n°n-pay~nt of premium, CERI'IFICATE ltOLDER ZSSU-ED FOR ZNFORMATZONAL pURPOSES ONLY. "z~'~'~'~'~' i't/:~T ......... L I ADDITIONAL IN.~URED; INSURER LE'Fr L'~' CANCEU.ATION E, HDULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLIOIEB BE CANCELLED BEFORE TIlE · EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF; THE I$$UiNO COMPANY W~LL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL ..~..0..~'_ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, OUT IrAILURr TO MAIL ~UCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY · OF ANY KiND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGe. iTS OR AUTHOR~/O RJ~J/RESI~NTATIVE - 1659- ~AcORD CORPORATION CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WFB: www.cityofmound.com MEMO DATE: April 15, 2003 TO: FROM: RE: Mayor Meisel Council Members Hanson, City Manage~-~' Kandis Performance Evaluation On April 17th, I observed my third anniversary as City Manager for the City of Mound. The last three years will go down in my personal history book as the most demanding of my lifetime. They have been fraught with challenges. The most recent year, however, in my estimation, has been filled with success. It could be termed as the "Year of Celebration," as we all bathe in the glory of seeing our work come to fruition. Without a doubt, this has been the most satisfying time of my professional life. Foremost, I wish to thank you, Mayor and Council, for sharing the vision and for being the best possible example of teamwork that a local government professional could hope for. Thank you. Professional Goals and Priorities At my six-month anniversary, we used the 360-degree evaluation, performed by Lynn and Associates. I encourage your continued involvement in this standardized and very effective evaluation tool as a means for scoring the performance of your City Manager. Doing so accomplishes two things: 1) It gives feedback and applause for good performance, thus reinforcing it. 2) It gives feedback if the Manager has strayed from the wishes of the council and allows for recourse. Without it, the City and the City Manager run the risk of becoming at odds, putting at risking a long-term relationship, which is good in the long mn for the City. All of this depends upon the total commitment and involvement of the council and others solicited for comment. What follows is a list of those invited to comment this year: 1 2-5 6-13 14-16 Mayor Council: Brown, Hanus, Osmek, Meyer. Department Heads: Ritter, Smith, Fackler, Skinner, Businaro, Pederson, McKinley, Colotti Chairs of Commissions: Geoff Micheal - Planning Commission Susan Taylor -Parks Commission Jim Funk - Docks Commission printed on recycled paper - 1660- 17-19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26-27 City Staff, drawn randomly: Shirley Hawks - Police Dept Collette Roberts - Finance Dept Denice Widmer - Parks & Public Utilities John Dean - City Attorney John Cameron - City Engineer Jim Prosser - Ehler's & Associates Gene Zulk - School Superintendent Patsy Keisow - Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Sue Cathers - Historical Society Citizens: Vince Forystek - 3131 Inverness Lane (declined) Ray Salazar - 4559 Island View Drive (declined) City and Departmental Accomplishments and Goals Taking account of the work accomplished in the past year is just about impossible for me to do on my own. The year flies by for me, and frankly, much of it is a blur due to the pace. To help me with that, I ask Departments Heads to list the year's accomplishments, those efforts underway and the goals and needs of the department. I intentionally ask them to keep the lists to three or less items, and to only list those to which I gave direction or otherwise were involved. You can see that the lists are often lengthier than requested due to the number of actual achievements in a department, of which they are very proud. Police Department Accomplishments: --SRO position secured with Federal Grant. --Hiring of new police chief. Efforts underway, but not yet completed: --New Public Safety Facility completion. --Replacement of two officers who resigned. Goals/needs of the department --Maintain fleet by replacement of squads per past retention schedule. --Return to 5 year rotation for equipment. --Develop strategies for patrolling proposed "Greenway" areas in City. Fire Department Accomplishments: --All the activities associated with the Public Safety Facility project (needs assessment, project approval, financing, design, and implementation). --Support and approval of a "full time paid" Fire Chief. --Support of MFD apparatus committee and purchase of a new fire pumper. --Participation and leadership in establishment of a "solid" Fire Commission group that has involved all of our fire contract cities in our fire department. --The 911 ceremony and PS facility ground breaking in which Kandis was very involved, was "first class." - 1661 - Efforts underway, but not yet completed: --Public Safety Facility project: construction, completion, and move in. --Fire District development with City of Minnetrista. --MFD Relief Association bylaw and pension study. --Review and recreate administrative policies, procedures, bylaws, standard operating guidelines that are in a more appropriate and up-to-date format. Goals/needs of the department: --Public Safety Facility completion and start up (move in). --Enhance HazMat and specialized training for fire officers and firefighters. --Complete a MFD Relief Association bylaw and pension study. --Rewrite all MFD administrative policies, procedures, bylaws, and operational guidelines into a more current format. --Transition into a more current NFPA Fire Officer Selection process. --Successfully implement a Fire District arrangement with the City of Minnetrista. Community Development Department Accomplishments: --Mound Market Place and Village By the Bay. --Mound Post Office, and demo of old post office. --Right-of-way agreement with Hennepin County for CSAH 15. Efforts underway, but not yet completed: --Amendments of zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan - consistency issues pursuant to state statue. --Amendment to City Code Section 330 (subdivision regulations). --Amendments to nuisance ordinance. --Skate park construction. --Consideration of future of Longpre building. --Relationship with Mound Harbor Renaissance. --Start of greenway project. Goals/needs of the department: --Adult-use ordinance. --Temporary building regulations (i.e., hoop houses, canopies, etc.). --Consummation of agreement with Mound Harbor Renaissance. --Completion of greenway project. City Clerk Accomplishments: --Improved communication internal and external customers. --Successful administration of two elections, with extenuating circumstances of the US Senate race. --Organization of the Clerk's Office and records. - 1662- Efforts underway, but not yet completed: --Organization of archives. --Training: retain and increase conference and training dollars at a level that will enhance the department education and skills necessary to perform our jobs in an efficient and professional way. Goals/needs of the department: --Development of Administrative Assistant as information source, as backup in the absence of the City Clerk. --Purchase of data storage and retrieval equipment---critical, for the total organization of city records in a storable and retrievable form. Public Works Department Accomplishments: --Storm sewer upgrade project. --Initiation of annual street and utility upgrade project. --City wide no parking map. Efforts underway, but not yet completed: --New street signs and no parking signs. --Well and pump house at Evergreen tower. --First annual street and utilities upgrade project. --Radio reads for water meters. Goals/needs of the department: --Annual rotation plan for capital equipment purchases--critical. --Continuing annual street and utility upgrade project. --Completion of well and pump house at Evergreen tower. --Need sign making equipment critical to cost savings by making our own signs. Finance Department Accomplishments: --Implementation of the new financial system: With Kandis' support and encouragement, we were able to implement the new financial system and to meet, on a timely basis, all deadlines, including reporting, payroll, and vendor payments. --Leaf drop off program: We renegotiated and continued to provide a location for the residents to drop off leaves from April to November at no charge to them. --Public Safety Bldg. Lease Revenue Bonds: In July 2002 the City sold $6,860,000 in bonds for the construction of the new Public Safety Building. That was the culmination of a lot of work on the part of the Council, the Administration, the Police and Fire Departments and many other people. --Employee Benefit Enhancements: During the year we added two new options for employees to make deferred compensation contributions, we implemented the Post Retirement Health Insurance Plan with the State of Minnesota, and the Payroll Direct Deposit. The summer hours' change has been greatly appreciated by us all. - 1663- Efforts underway, but not yet completed: --UB ACH Direct Payments: We will inform the residents that we would make this added method of paying their utility bills and, if we get a positive response, we will implement it. --Revisions to the Administrative Code: Many meetings and correspondence took place between the Non-union Employee Committee and the City Council Personnel Committee. --City Hall Improvements: This is a big morale booster to employees working at City Hall and to us in the Finance Department in particular. Finally all four of us will be in the same area. Goals/needs of the department: --Training: Conference and training dollars at a level that will enable us to get the education and skills necessary to perform our jobs in an efficient and professional way. --Technology: All computers own by the City should have the same capabilities with the same version of software and operating system. Parks, Docks and City Hall Accomplishments: --Hiring of Administrative Assistant. --Gain funding for remodel of City Hall. --Shoreline study for the Dock Program. Efforts underway, but not yet completed: --Dock Location Map. --Capital Replacement Program. Goals/needs for the department: --Evaluation of dock fees. --Promote remodeling of a combined Public Works and Parks Facility. --Updating of Parks play equipment. --Maintaining a Maintenance Equipment Replacement Schedule. --Complete a Park Districting program. Liquor Store Accomplishments: --Construction of the new store, opening date at the most opportune time. --Classy ribbon cutting event, making a big splash as the first new store in Mound Market Place. --The resounding community support for the store, representing financial gains. Efforts underway, not yet accomplished: --New store Grand Opening. --Creative marketing measures. - 1664- Goals/needs of the department: --Grow the customer base. --Grow store profits. City Manager's Goals for Upcoming Year I suggest that the council agree on 3-5 ways in which they would like to see me develop professionally over the next year. You are invited to consider the list suggested improvements contained in the evaluation, or think of others not listed there. One thing I would like considered as a goal for me is to learn to discern what must be done now and what can wait. That would be a repeat from last year and a lesson I still need to learn. Achieving that would help make my workload more manageable. It could be entitled "learn to discern priorities, and manage work load more effectively." I have talked with the Department Heads about this and asked for their support and consideration in this area. Conclusions IfI may, these are my overall conclusions regarding my position: The Mound City Managers' job is, without a doubt, the largest undertaking of my lifetime. The amount of work exceeds one person's capabilities. My time split between redevelopment, human resources and general administration stretches me to the nth degree. Slowing down the rate of new undertakings by discerning the priorities is critical to carrying out successful endeavors and preventing overload. The expectations create pressures that are compounded by the small staff. Even though we have added to the size of the staff, Mound continues to work with a smaller staff than in past years. Our work force is notably smaller than other cities our size. So it can be assumed that, just as I am feeling the overwhelming demands of the job, so are those who are helping carry out the work. Remarkably, we are accomplishing more, but with fewer people and financial resources. This is very draining. Council understanding of these demands and pressures will ease concerns I have regarding adequately measuring up to council expectations. Req uest/Recommendation In summary, I wish to congratulate council members on a great year and thank you for your part in that. I also wish to thank you for your help and understanding in making my job manageable in the upcoming year. I am pleased and proud to have part of the "Year of Celebration." With that, I am requesting and recommending the following: That my compensation is stepped up from Year 4 to Year 5, or $79,055, plus the customary 10% surplus pay for salaried employees at the City 'of Mound, equating to $86,960.50, retroactive to April 17. (Refer to the 2003 Classification Plan.) Thank you for your kind consideration of this request. I am happy to answer any questions. - 1665- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com MEMO DATE: April 21, 2003 TO: Mayor Meisel Council Members FROM: Kandis Hanson City Hanson Replacement Pages Please replace pages 1665-1667 with these three replacement pages. Regarding salary, I made reference to the correct years to step up Year 4 to Year 5, but referenced the wrong figUres. I have made the corresponding corrections to the resolution. Please pardon my error. Thanks! printed on recycled paper Goals/needs of the department: --Orow the customer base. --Grow store profits. Ci~. Manager's Goals for Upcoming Year I suggest that the council agree on 3-5 ways in which they would like to see me develop professionally over the next year. You are invited to consider the list suggested improvements contained in the evaluation, or think of others not listed there. One thing I would like considered as a goal for me is to learn to discern what must be done now and what can wait. That would be a repeat from last year and a lesson I still need to learn. Achieving that would help make my workload more manageable. It could be entitled "learn to discern priorities, and manage work load more effectively." I have talked with the Department Heads about this and asked for their support and consideration in this area. Conclusions If I may, these are my overall conclusions regarding my position: The Mound City Managers' job is, without a doubt, the largest undertaking of my lifetime. The amount of work exceeds one person's capabilities. My time split between redevelopment, human resources and general administration stretches me to the nth degree. Slowing down the rate of new undertakings by discerning the priorities is critical to carrying out successful endeavors and preventing overload. +he expectations create pressures that are compounded by the small staff. Even though we have added to the size of the staff, Mound continues to work with a smaller staff than in past years. Our work force is notably smaller than other cities our size. So it can be assumed that, just as I am feeling the overwhelming demands of the job, so are those who are helping carry out the work. Remarkably, we are accomplishing more, but with fewer people and financial resources. This is very draining. Council understanding of these demands and pressures will ease concerns I have regarding adequately measuring up to council expectations. Request/Recommendation In summary, I wish to congratulate council members on a great year and thank you for your part in that. I also wish to thank you for your help and understanding in making my job manageable in the upcoming year. I am pleased and proud to have part of the "Year of Celebration." With that, I am requesting and recommending the following: · That my compensation is stepped up from Year 4 to Year 5, or $~, plus the customary 10% surplus pay for salaried employees at the City of Mound, equating to $~h-9607513, retroactive to April 17. (Refer to the 2003 Classification Plan.) r9o, 0t, J. Thank you for your kind consideration of this request. I am happy to answer any questions. CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION AMENDING EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND CITY MANAGER, KANDIS HANSON WHEREAS, the City of Mound and Kandis Hanson entered into an employment agreement on March 14, 2000; and WHEREAS, this agreement was amended by Resolution No. 01-57 on June 26, 2001, and by Resolution No. 02-60A on May 21,2002; and WHEREAS, Kandis Hanson has presented a performance evaluation dated April 22, 2OO3; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to amend the following items on the aforementioned agreement. Items not mentioned remain as stated in the March 14, 2000 agreement. Salary. The City of Mound shall pay Hanson for her services rendered on an annual base salary of $81,876 plus an additional 10% of her salary for time worked over 40 hours per week, equaling $90,063.60, effective and retroactive to April 17, 2003. Her salary is payable in installments at the same time as other employees of the City. Adopted by the City Council this 22® day of April, 2003. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel - 1666- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 03- RESOLUTION AMENDING EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND CITY MANAGER, KANDIS HANSON WHEREAS, the City of Mound and Kandis Hanson entered into'an employment agreement on March 14, 2000; and WHEREAS, this agreement was amended by Resolution No. 01-57 on June 26, 2001, and by Resolution No. 02-60A on May 21, 2002; and WHEREAS, Kandis Hanson has presented a performance evaluation dated April 16, 2003; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to amend the following items on the aforementioned agreement. Items not mentioned remain as stated in the March 14, 2000 agreement. Salary. The City of Mound shall pay Hanson for her services rendered on an annual base salary of $79.055 plus an additional 10% of her salary for time worked over 40 hours per week, equaling $86.960.50, effective and retroactive to April 17, 2003. Her salary is payable in installments at the same time as other employees of the City. 2. Deferred Compensation. The City of Mound shall continue to pay Hanson deferred compensation equaling 3% of her wages. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April, 2003. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel - 1667- 360 Degree Review Summary Kandis Hanson, City Manager - April 17, 2003 Average (1) Shows diplomacy, respect and sensitivity in dealing with customers. 3.80 (2) Demonstrates care and concern about the quality of service to customers. 4.05 (3) Responds to customers in a timely and appropriate manner. 4.06 (4) Maintains good working relationship with customers. 3.81 (5) Views complaints as an opportunity to creatively solve issues and responds with 3.94 composure to criticism and/or complaints. Average Customer Service 3,93 (1) Communicates appropriately in spoken and written form. 4.15 (2) Demonstrates good listening skills. 3.68 (3) Shares information accurately and in a timely manner. 3.94 (4) Respects confidentiality and privacy of others. 3.89 (5) Is receptive to feedback and other opinions. 3.50 (6) Communicates expectations to others effectively. 3.88 Average Communication 3.84 (1 ) Cooperates with and supports co-workers to accomplish team goals. 3.93 (2) Performs the basics of supervision (i.e., completes reviews on time, conducts staff 3.83 meetings, provides regular feedback to employees, etc.) (3) Analyzes situations and considers alternatives before making decisions. 3.80 (4) Addresses employee issues in an appropriate manner, place and time. 3.81 (5) Takes timely and appropriate disciplinary action. 3.90 (6) Recognizes and encourages positive employee actions and behaviors. 3.92 Average Human Resources Administration 3.87 (1) Manages, monitors and makes effective use of money, material and human 3.31 resources. (2) Assesses, evaluates and effectively delegates authority and responsibility in 4.23 accordance with employees' capabilities to make the best use of their talents, skills and knowledge. (3) Keeps others (i.e., Council, staff, peers, consultants, outside agencies)informed on 4.16 issues that affect the City. (4) Observes rules and regulations (i.e., Data Privacy Act, Administrative Code Policies, 3.41 OSHA, etc.) (5) Understands issues from a Countywide and departmental point of view. 3.56 (6) Complies with all statutes, rules, policies, procedures and reporting requirements as 3.77 they affect the City in a timely and accurate manner. Average Management 3.74 1 - 1668 - (1) Provides leadership to organizational efforts within the City and serves as a role 3.74 model. (2) Inspires others to achieve desired results by promoting involvement, participation, 3.89 cooperation and informed decision making. (3) Promotes a positive, constructive and supportive work environment. 3.64 (4) Fosters good will and represents the City in a professional manner. 3.95 (5) Encourages new ideas and procedures. 4.0 (6) Utilizes employees in a manner which recognizes and develops their skills and 4.0 training. (7) Empowers others to explore creative ways to complete job responsibilities. 4.0 · Average Leadership 3,89 Total Average 19.27 Adjusted Average 3.85 Narrative: ~,omments from Evaluators: See attached ........ Other Comments: See attached ..... Step increase: Approved ~ Not approved ~ Step #: __ Approval date: Effective date: By signing this appraisal I acknowledge that I have read and had an opportunity to discuss the contents with the City Council. My signature does not necessarily indicate my agreement with the evaluation. Employee signature Date Mayor signature Date 2 - 1669- COMMENTS OFFERED AS FOLLOWS: COMMITMENT TO CUSTOMER SERVICE: · Highly competent. Borderline great. One more year of seasoning and performance moves the scores up. · Does recognize that City is a service and needs to be done in a professional manner. o Approaches customer service in a professional manner and considers ~t a high pr~or~[y. 9he expects city staff to respond with the same positive approach to customer service. · Responds with composure to criticism and/or complaints. · Some type of regular set office hours or on-site schedule would be beneficial to both internal and external customers. There doesn't appear to be a designated time of day when we can expect Kandis to be in the office in order to conduct our internal business with her or when people of the community may contact her. · I like Kandis' "hands on" approach to dealing with the public. She also does a agood job on conveying a positive attitude. · Strong commitment is clear. Is open and good listener. Provides timely/useful information. Accepts and provides good feedback. COMMUNICATION · Does understand how to understand and communicate important information but does tend to become defensive with critical feedback. · Has held back information on department plans. Needs to be up front in keeping department heads informed. · Kandis is proficient in all aspects of communication and does a super job of communicating with city staff. · Kandis has effectively communicated her expectations to all city employees, much better than previous City Managers. · Does not communicate appropriately in spoken form. · Doesn't accurately share information. · Is not receptive to feedback and other opinions. · More emphasis needs to be placed on communication to the employee groups as a whole. The monthly happenings newsletter is a good communication took, however it often does not come out on a monthly basis. · Also, the post-council meeting update meetings are a valuable communication forum where ideally, information and feedback can flow both ways. However, these meetings often are cancelled due to other commitments of the City Manager. Each Wednesday morning after a council meeting there should be a regularly scheduled update meeting - either run by the City Manager or the Acting City Manager or a designated representative who attended the council meeting. · It is important to have consistent or regular employee meetings to disseminate information to the rank and file and/or to gather feedback and input. · Kandis listens well and does a good job on communicating expectations and decisions. · Clear, concise communicator. Offers enough without too much. 3 - 1670- HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION · I have not been involved in HR a lot - this section was one answered on feedback from Kandis · Councilmembers, at this time, have not received any feedback of any achievement or negative issues regarding this categorY. · Needs to complete employee evaluations in a timely manner. · Kandis demands a high level of performance from city employees. She communicates her expectations to staff, and provides excellent support when needed. · Kandis rewards and congratulates staff when a job is well done. · Does not address employee issues in an appropriate manner, place and time. · More emphasis should be given to the Human Resource portion of the City Manager position. There should be an open-door policy whereby employees can go to Kandis, who is the City's Human Resource Manager, with any concerns they may have. I would ask that she be more accessible to all employees and make employee welfare and professional growth a priority. · Kandis utilizes staff and others effectively in formulating decisions and recommendations. MANAGEMENT · An important concern regarding effective use of city money. In a tight financial situation we must be 100% more frugal with the taxpayer's dollar. · This means EVERYTHING! If the choices are cutting "conference" spending or saving a job that serves the people on a daily basis, I go with the job. · Generally does a great job of delegating authority and responsibility to staff. She provides daily or weekly updates t o a II employees o r s taft through e mail, p hones, o r face-to-face conversation onall pertinent issues. · Her enthusiasm and drive for successful projects sometimes creates a situation that involves her more than necessarY. The end result (or side effect) is demands on her time. · Does not understand issues from a citywide and departmental point of view. · VerY fair and professional · Effort should be made to ensure that city policies and practices are implemented consistently across all departments and to all employees. Technology, equipment, office purchases and training opportunities should be shared by and granted to employees in a fair and consistent manner. · As business owners continually strive to reduce costs without lessening their service or product, so should the City Manager strive to take a proactive approach to monitoring and reducing the cost of local government. Particularly the large-ticket items related to the downtown redevelopment and consultant fees should be monitored so as not to jeopardize current employee jobs or benefits and/or government services provided to our local citizens. · A suggestion would a Iso b e t o become more p to-active i n Iobbying o ur Iocal state representatives regarding Mound needs and priorities and to have a plan in place for the upcoming expected or anticipated state budget cutbacks. · Kandis delegates responsibility clearly, and is genuinely interested in the feedback she receives. 4 -1671 - LEADERSHIP · You are a VERY important cog in the rebirth of Mound. The leadership you provide, with the leadership of the City Council, are re-shaping the City of Mound for generations to come. · There is an excitement in Mound that you can feel. But the work is not done. Without strong commitment, the forces of "NO!" can win. Do NOT expect these nay-sayers to lay down and let your success happen. · Kandis sets a "goal orientated" and "professional" example for all city staff and customers. She leads with a positive approach that encourages and supports the city staff. · Kandis needs to prioritize her work related goals with a more conservative time frame in mind, to reduce opportunity for "burn out" and to cut back on work hours. · Does not serve as a role model. · Doesn't promote a positive, supportive work environment. · Doesn't foster good will and represent the City in a professional manner. · A constructive team leader · Kandis is a good representative for the city. The public can feel that someone is in charge at City Hall. · Great leader, inspires, walks talk. COMMENTS ON PERSPECTIVE OF PERSON'S GREATEST STRENGTH: · Works very hard at communication - making sure the public understands as well as staff and Council. · We have a lot going on and I feel communication is important. · Marketing and promotion of the City. · The respect you receive from our downtown business owners is very impressive. · Kandis has an attitude that emphasizes goals and success, plus she has the professional personal tools to support this positive attitude. · Very interested in hearing opinions and respects those opinions. · Confidence in herself and a caring attitude about the community as a whole. · Kandis embraces new ways of governing and does not seem to be afraid of change. She is goal oriented and understands the workings of local government. · I believe that Kandis' greatest strength lies in her ability to continue to forge ahead with the Mound downtown redevelopment. Amidst obstacles and delays she continues to stay positive and on-task with the goal of seeing the projects completed. She is committed to follow-through on those redevelopment projects, working with the project teams, developers, and consultants to ensure timely fruition - even putting them on the "fast track" so to speak, when necessary. · Her ability to use others to do her job. Her weekly Project Team meetings with expensive consultants to tell her how to do her job. She's smart enough to get good staff to back her and make her look better than she is. · Positive attitude · Very strong leadership · Her desire to achieve goals such as the downtown Greenway Project that will positively impact this City. · Highly disciplined- good motivator 5 - 1672- COMMENTS ON SUGGESTION FOR IMPROVEMENT FOR THIS PERSON · Try not to become overwhelmed with all the things going on in town and City Hall. · A little more aggressive cost cutting measures and analysis · Understand that most members of the City Council have full respect and confidence in your ability. This trust is reinforced by the success we see with our own eyes. · Try not to be so self-serving and sometimes have double standards as far as work rules. · Kandis gets so focused on goals and City of Mound projects, that she frequently over works and over schedules herself. The results are very good for the City of Mound, but somewhat unfair to Kandis herself. A suggestion would be to formulate an aggressive but reasonable paced timeline for goals. · Kandis does not foster widespread support within the community. Her approach leaves many thinking her motives are self-serving. Development in interpersonal skills and more visibility in community service would be helpful. · To think a little longer before speaking out on sensitive issues such as the Police Chief Interviews. To be quicker about praising an employee instead of being so quick to criticize that employee for one small mistake on an otherwise excellent performance. · Be more selective on the issues you want to press. · Could decrease meeting time by eliminating some personal information. · Develop more mechanisms to focus Council time on high importance issues. OTHER COMMENTS: · I am satisfied with City Manager Hanson's job performance. · The only concern I have is that the position you currently have is being used as a stepping stone to a new position in a different city. · I am happy to be working with Kandis as our City Manager. · Kandis has done an exceptional job in 2002! She should be recognized for her hard work! · Kandis is bringing morale of entire city staff to new all time Iow. · I don't feel qualified to respond to the questions on this page. Sorry. 6 - 1673- MEANING OF NUMBER VALUES USED IN EVALUATION 4 2 PROACTIVE TASK EXCELLENCE: Proactive Task Excellence performance takes into consideration all the key points listed in "Task Excellence" as well as the following: Excellence is the standard; the individual pro-actively thinks ahead of and outside of their defined responsibilities, and offers usable suggestions to improve work proce§ses, service, and results. She anticipates and prevents potential problems. She independently seeks out opportunities to learn and grow. TASK EXCELLENCE: The employee is doing a very good job, and, at times, an excellent job. She consistently surpasses expectations. She demonstrates technical and professional excellence in tasks. She willingly updates her professional knowledge. She excels in her defined work responsibilities. TASK COMPENTENCE: The employee is doing a good job, and, at times, a very good job. She demonstrates technical and professional competence in work tasks and areas of specific practice. Assignments are completed. They effectively work within their defined job responsibilities, and comply with professional development requirements. IMPROVEMENT NECESSARY: The employee is barely meeting the minimum requirements necessary to meet job goals, development goals, and/or performance factor criteria. UNACCEPTABLE: The employee is not meeting the minimum requirements and must show improvement or disciplinary action will result. - 1674- ~pr 84 Z883 18:33:89 ~i~ F~x -> 95247ZOGZO ~&niois~r~or ~g~ 881 0£ 884 -FridayFax- A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities Not too late to register for City Day at the Capitol Add your voice to the more than 400 city officials who will be in St. Paul April 9 to tell their stories about the real and profound impacts of proposals by the Governor and Legislature on their communities. City Day at the Capitol, hosted by the League of Minnesota Cities, is an opportunity to tell legislators how your city will be impacted by: · Cuts to revenue sharing · Levy limits; · Restrictions on debt; and more. The agenda for City Day at the Capitol includes: · 10:30 a.m.- Registration (LMC, 145 University Ave. W) · 11 a.m.-Noon Group A- Legislative briefing (Christ Lutheran Church, 105 University Ave. W) Group B - Box lunch (LMC) · Noon- 1 p.m. Group A - Box lunch (LMC) Group B - Legislative briefing (Christ Lutheran Church) · 2:15 p.m. - Assemble on front steps of Capitol · 2:30 p.m.- Press conference, Capitol steps To help you prepare for City Day at the Capitol, we've prepared this checklist: 1. RSVP. While registration is not necessary, it is encouraged to help ensure an accurate rneal count. Please send the name(s) and title(s) of each participant- including a business leader and resident - and the name of your city to Stephanie April 4, 2003 Page 1 Lake, LMC, at slake@lmnc, org or by fax to (651) 215-4141. 2. Request a meeting with your legislators before or after the press conference. To make an appointment, call your legislators' office; tell them the date and time you'd like to meet; and the names of the people in your group, Also share the topics you'd like to discuss (levy limits, debt restrictions~ cuts to revenue sharing). You can learn more about your legislators by visiting: www. leg.sis re. rn n.u s/le~,.,/legdir.asp. 3. Answer the following questions, and be prepared to share your answers with legislators: · How would cuts to revenue sharing, levy limits, and restrictions on debt impact your city and its ability to provide services, conduct infrastructure and capital improvement projects? · What actions is your city considering in light of the proposals? What steps already have been taken? · How will businesses be impacted by the decisions? Residents? 4. The League is located in St. Paul, one- half mile north of 1-94 and two blocks west of the State Capitol on the corner of Rice and University. Traveling east or west on 1-94, take Marion (Kellogg) north. Follow Marion to Sherburne. Turn right onto Sherburne to Rice. Go right onto Rice for one block to University. Go right onto University. The first driveway on the right is the main entrance for the lot and for parking. For more information 0n city lcgialat|ve is,~ues, contac! any m~mber of the I.,~ague of Minnesota Cities Intergovcrnmcnlal Relai[ona team. 651.28:1..1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1675- apr 84 2003 1B:33:45 Via Fax -> 9524728628 Administrator Page 002 Of 004 .I° PridayPax A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities Please enter the parking lot from University Ave., where staff will provide participants a parking permit, a map and directions to reserved parking areas. Check out the League web site, www.h-nnc.org, for more information. Ways and Means begins final budget push On Thursday, the House Republican Caucus unveiled the outlines of their plan to balance the state budget and mitigate some of the deep cuts included in Governor Pawlenty's budget-- including the restoration of some of the cuts for cities and counties as well as higher education and nursing homes. The plan was adopted by the House Ways and Means Committee on late Thursday. At least publicly, the House plan is little more than a broadoutline of how much the state will spend on broad categories of state spending. Over the next several weeks, additional information will be unveiled as committees develop their plans around the targets. Consistent with the Governor, the plan does not involve any new taxes but instead, relies on revenue from a proposed casino at the Canterbury Downs racetrack in Shakopee to cushion the budget cuts. The plan also addresses the state deficit by proposing a two- year freeze in spending for state employee health insurance, a reduction in the state vehicle fleet and reductions in "low-priority" programs such as the income tax political check-off. The plan would restore $91 million in state aid to cities and counties, $50 million for higher education programs and $70 million for nursing April 4, 2003 Page 2 homes and other programs for the elderly. At this time, we do not have any detailed information on how the $91 million will be distributed between cities and counties. We do not expect any detailed information to be available until the tax committee marks up their committee bill in the next several weeks. The plan would also establish an "internet auction" procedure where vendors would compete and bid online to provide goods and services to the state. Coincidentally, earlier this year when we surveyed our rnembers for streamlining ideas, many of our city officials suggested a similar process for city purchases. During the Ways and Means committee discussion, House Democrats raised concerns about the reliability of the state's tobacco settlement in the wake ora recent Illinois state judge's order that Philip Morris post a $12 billion bond in order to appeal a recent class action lawsuit defeat. In response to that judge's order, Philip Morris suggested that the requirement could force the company into bankruptcy and jeopardize the tobacco settlements. Representative Abrarns acknowledged the issue and indicated that the status of the Illinois lawsuit would be closely monitored. Where's the bill? This week's legislative activities included dozens of hearings on hundreds of bills. With hearings extending into late afternoon on Friday, we decided to briefly summarize the status of a few of the most visible bills of interest to cities in the table on the next page. Next week-- which marks the second committee deadline--we will have more information on these and other bills in the Cities Bulletin. For more infoTmalion on city legi,qalive i~sue~, conlac! any membe~ of the League of Minnesota Cities Intergovernmental Relations team. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1676- License tabs Increase license tab fees to raise Considered by the Transportation Awaiting action in the HF 1372 (Beard) additional revenue for Finance Committee on April 2. No Finance committee. SF 128,4 (Johnson, D.) transportation projects, vote was taken, but the bill will be discussed next week and considered for possible inclusion in the committee's omnibus finance bill. Fiscal disparities Abolish the metropolitan area Both considered by the Taxes No Senate companion. HF 514 (Lenczewski) fiscal disparities program committee March 27. The chair of the taxes committee said the bills are "dead for this year." HF 495 (Johnson, J.) SF 635 is awaiting action SF 6.35 (Belan~;er) in the Taxes committee. Concealed carry Establishes a "shall issue" policy HF 261 passed Ways & Means on SF 222 was returned to HF 261 (Boudreau) for permits to carry a pistol in April 3. the author on March 20. SF 222 (Pariseau) public. SF 369 (Murphy) Requires specific reasons for No house companion. SF 369 passed Crime pistol permit denials. Prevention on April 2. Wine in grocery stores Requires cities to issue on-sale Companion not likely to move in the Failed in Commerce & HF 938 (Sykora) wine licenses to supermarkets, house since the bill died in the Utilities on April 4. SF 914 (Scheid) senate. Youth access to tobacco Sets administrative penalties for Passed as amended in Civil Law on Awaiting action in HF 56~. (Gerlach) unlawful sale of tobacco to April 4, Commerce & Utilities. SF 992 (Knutson) minors and prohibits local ordinances that set greater penalties. Public ernployee wage Institutes a public employee Government Operations committee Awaiting action in State freeze wage freeze for state employees, amended the bill to apply only to & Local Government HF 793 (Gerlach) state employees on April 3. Operations. 5F 773 (Neuville) Local government Allows local governments to Passed State Government Finance as Scheduled for a hearing impact notes request local impact notes on amended and was referred to Ways & on April 7 in State & HF 624 (Seifert) agency rules from the Means on April 1. Local Government SF 1070 (Senjem) Commissioner of Finance. Operations, Raclno Authorizes placement ofgamlng Passed Taxes as amended without Scheduled for a hearing HF 6,:1-6 (Buesgens) machines at Canterbury Park recommendation and was referred to on April 8 in State & SF 576 (Day) racetrack. House Ways & Means on April 2, Local Government , Operations, Pay equity compliance Transfers pay equity compliance Passed Local Government & Metro Awaiting action in State HF 975 (Jacobson) to the State Auditor and allows Affairs and was referred to State & Local Government SF 1005 (Knutson) the office to char~;e a fee, Government Finance on April 4. Operations, Pay equity reporting Allows pay equity reports to be Passed Local Government & Metro Awaiting action in State HF 1253 (Brod) filed every 5 years. Affairs and was referred to State & Local Government SF 1~.51 (Fischbach) Government Finance on April 2. Operations. Political subdivision Transfers the authority to grant Passed Local Government & Metro Awaiting action in State compensation lirnit waivers from the law limiting Affairs and was referred to State & Local Government HF 1133 (Kielkuckl) political subdivision employee Government Finance on April 4. Operations. SF 1~.32 (Knutson) compensation limit to the State Auditor and allows the office to charge a fee. Alternative Notification Would allow cities to use web Passed Local Government & Metro Awaiting action in State HF 1122 (Adolphson) publication and newsletter Affiairs and was referred to Civil Law & Local Government SF ~076 (G. Olson) publication for legal notices on April 4. Operations. Fox rno~'¢ inforrnalion on city lcgislal/ve i~sues, conlacl any member of the League of Minnesola Cilics Inlergovernmenlal Relstions learn, 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1677- flpr 84 Z883 18:35:fl9 Via Fax -> 95247ZflGZ8 fldninistrator Page 884 Of 804 City Day at the Capitol WED NESDAY~ APRIL 9 CITY OFFICIALS · BUSINESS LEADERS lt~a.r fl~e Govemor~ stat. c buret proposal ~nd S~mr.c pxopcc~ tax ~eeze proposfl won't work for M.~n~csota cji ie~. Bri.g ~ business leadex ~d scsid~t to thc Capkol ~l~ you on Apffi 9 to ~how le~slators rhar thc impacts reach beyond c~ hall to ycmr c(}mmm~l.y'~ residcnrs and The aoenda include,: 11 a.m.-12p.m. Grcmp A I,cgidarm bhe~ 12-1 p.m. Group A~B~x lunch ~C'&i/di~ Group B~L%~huive briefing ([?hffst 2:15 p.m. Aaacmblc on f~ont slep~ of 2:30 p,,m Press coherence, ~pitol ~teps 3:30 p.m. Appohxunent~ ~fl~ Bc~rc and a6er the [)r~ss con[%ren~, you arc encouraged to sc'hedulc appointments to meet wkh your legislators (visit ~.leg.~m~.mn . as/ledge ~. ~ p fbr infb on leglsla mr,q). For mor~ details on this event, visit w~.lmnc.org or call (651) 281-1200 Make your voice heard April 8! · RESIDENTS Strengthen your conumunity's voice--invite a business leader and resident. .~' P'P ~i etJcoan.~ged lo ~ti~tm an awu,'ale meal count, 7'h~re a YES! w~ w~, make a difference by participating in City Day at the Capitol on April 9. We'll bdng a business leader and resident with us--add our city to the list! Name Title CJJit TO RSVP: Fax to 651.215,4141, or e-mall slake@lmnc.org LEAC~UE OF MINNL8OTA CITIES-145 UNIVERSITY AVE, W, ST, PAUL, bin. 55t03-(6~'1) 281-1200 For more information on city legislative issues, contact any member of the League of Minnesota Cities late;governmental Relations team. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1678- apr 11ZBf13 l?:ZSIZ6 Via Fax -> 95Z47ZOBZfl adainistrator Page 881 Of 883 F 'dayF - ri ax- Is the economy getting better--or worse? On Thursday, the Department of Finance released its April economic update and the news was mixed. The good news was that revenues for February and March exceeded projections by nearly $60 million or approximately 3.3%. The bad news is that the report suggests that the state and national economies continue to straggle and that Minnesota's job losses continue to outpace the national averages. Total state payroll employment is now 2.2 percent below the levels observed more than two years ago in February 2001. A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities April 11, 2003 Page 1 Late last week the House Republican caucus unveiled their plan which would restore $91 million of the governor's city and count aid reductions. That proposal has raised some controversy because it uses additional revenue Rom a new race track casino to restore aid reductions. Early this week, the Senate Democrats unveiled their plan which would restore $200 million of the city and county aid cuts. That plan is controversial because it raises income taxes and cigarette taxes to reduce state aid cuts. Minnesota's national economic consultant, Global Insight has now reduced its economic forecast for 2003, 2004 and 2005, but their forecast remains optimistic. The April baseline forecast by Global Insight calls for real GDP growth of 2.6 percent in 2003, followed by 4.2 percent growth in 2004, and 3.1 percent growth in 2005. The February forecast predicted growth rates of 3.0 percent in 2003, 4.6 percent in 2004 and 3.8 percent in 2005. These new, lower growth estimates will not irnmediately irnpact the state's projected deficit-- unless the governor and Department of Finance state decides to issue a special state budget forecast. The next regularly-scheduled official state budget forecast will not be released until late November. More tax proposals With almost daily regularity, legislators are introducing their own alternatives to the tax portions of the governor's budget proposal. Clearly, the components of the governor's plan--including the aid cuts and levy limits--are not sitting well with runny legislators from both sides of the aisle. Remember, these are only proposals and at this time, none seem to have the upper hand in the legislative process. That said, the movement away from the governor's plan is certainly promising. On Tuesday, Representative Dan Dorman and Senator Keith Langseth introduced nearly identical bills that would reduce and rearrange aid cuts to cities by eliminating the transit levy takeover aid that was established in 2001 and focusing the remaining city aid reduction on the market value homestead credit. The Dorman/Langseth proposals have generated controversy largely due to the geographic shift ia the impact of the cuts due to the focus of the cuts on the market value homestead credit and the elimination of transit replacement aid. On Thursday, the House DFL released the outlines of their proposed budget solution. The plan includes an income tax increase for upper income Minnesotaas, similar to the Senate plan, but affecting persons with individual incomes in excess of $250,000 and joint filers with incomes greater than $500,000. The plan cuts the income tax rates for lower income earners. For cities, the plan will apparently reduce aid cuts to about one-fifth of what the governor proposed. The plan would, however, delay the payment of December aids (or a major portion or' that aid payment) until sometime in 2004--presumably in July. By shifting the aid payments into a subsequent state fiscal year, the House DFL plan would be able to minimize aid cuts. Although the plan would minimize aid cuts, the payment delay could create cash flow problems for some cities. We expect several additional proposals to be introduced in the near future. Former Moorhead mayor, Representative Morrie Lashing is working Fo~' rnor¢ information on oily leg[sial[ye issues, conlact any memb~ of lbe League of Minnesola Ciliea Inle~'governmenlal Relation: team, 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1679- apr 11 2883 17:2G:15 gin Fax -> 9524?ZOG20 fidmiuistrator Page 88Z 0£ 883 'd -Frl ayFax- A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities on an alternatlve to the governor's plan and both the House and Senate Tax committees will develop proposals based on their respective $91 million and $200 million targets. House Research has posted official updated estimates of the governor's plan and the Dorman/Langseth proposal on their web site at ht tp://www.house.leg.sta re. mn.us/hrd/issinfo/03h fl 502. pdf Second deadline passes, whirlwind week ahead Today marks the second legislative committee deadline, the date by which committees must act favorably on bills, or companions of bills, that met the first deadline in the other house. The third deadline is Tuesday, April 29. The third deadline is lhe last day for the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Committee on Finance to act favorably on omnibus appropriations bills other than an omnibus bonding bill. With the approach of the third deadline, committees are scrambling to assemble omnibus bills. House leadership has indicated they will move aggressively to complete committee work on omnibus bills prior to shutting down Thursday, April 17 to break for a long weekend. This means that between next Monday and Thursday, House committees will draft, hear testimony and vote on omnibus bills. In the past couple of weeks, literally hundreds of bills have been heard in committees and then laid over for possible inclusion in omnibus bills. In many cases, bills remain viable only in one body. A good way to revive a bill that did not get a hearing in one body is to include the bill as a provision in an omnibus bill. In other words, expect a few floundering bills to resurface in the omnibus bill drafting process. April 11, 2003 Page 2 While the House intends to complete most committee work by the end of next week, the Senate plans to begin the omnibus drafting process next week and complete it after the spring recess. Bill bad business for cities A bill that would have required prohibited cities from operating any enterprise and make cities divest of any enterprise-like ventures has been laid to rest in the Local Government & Metropolitan Affairs committee. HF 1429 (Rep. Dick Borrell, R- Waverly) was heard in the committee on Wednesday, April 9% Rep. Borrell immediately amended his bill down to the study language found in the original bill. Essentially, this would have' required the state auditor to study the incidence and variety of enterprise-like activities within local governments. For the report, the state auditor would need to determine whether the city's businesses were profitable or not, and the practicality for privatizing the business. The one- time report would go to the House and Senate committees having jurisdiction over local governments. A move was made to involve the Office of Legislative Auditor in the study as well. Rep. Borrell stated the study was needed to analyze the anomalies in the LGA data. Members raised many concerns with the bill, as did city officials who were on hand Wednesday due to the LMC's City Day at the Capitol. In reality, the OSA could already conduct such a study and does not need legislation such as HF 1429 to do so. The OSA testified they may need extra funds to do such a study. The committee did not vote on the bill as the chair laid it over. In all likelihood this bill will not be resurrected this legislative session. As of press time, there did not appear to be a Senate companion bill. more informalion on city legislative issues, conlact any member of the l..~ague of Minnesota C/lies lnte~'governmental Relations team. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1680- 6~ ii 2003 17:27~01 ~i~ F~x -> 9524720B20 ~i~ato~ Pa~ 883 0£ - Frid ay Fa x- A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities House committee debates 2-mile extension of state building code April 11, 2003 Page 3 lofferdahl(a!lmnc, org if you have any questions or concerns on this legislation. On Wednesday, the House Governmental Operations & Veterans Affairs committee took up HF 1111, a bill making several technical housekeeping changes in Department of Administration programs. The bill includes clarifying changes in the administration of the state building code. The author of the bill, Rep. Phil Krinkie (R- Shoreview), offered an amendment eliminating cities' authority to adopt an ordinance providing for the application of the state building code 2 miles beyond a city's corporate limits. The League of Minnesota Cities and the Minnesota Association of Small Cities testified in opposition to the amendment. The committee rejected the elimination of this authority, but it did vote to amend current law to require a city to get the permission of the township board before adopting such an ordinance. The senate companion (SF 1180, DFL-Marko), which passed the State & Local Government Operations committee on April 1, does not include this additional requirement. Rep. Krinkie also tried to repeal the Construction Codes Advisory Council (CCAC). This group serves an important function by providing a forum for municipal building officials to get a fair hearing code regulation concerns. The repealer was deleted from the author's amendment, but the issue is likely to come up on the House floor as an amendment to HF 1:111 or to HF 1174 (Erickson), a bill relating to state advisory councils. HF llll/SF 1180 and HF 1174/SF 1063 are both awaiting passage by the full House and Senate. To review these bills, visit the legislature's web site at: www.leg.state.mn.us. Please contact Laura Offerdahl, LMC, at (651) 281-1260 or Hearings of interest MONDAY, April 14, 2003 l 0:00 AM Committee: House Transportation Finance Room: 200 State Office Building Chair: Rep. William Kuisle Agenda: Presentation of Omnibus Transportation Finance Bill MONDAY Senate Capital Investment Committee Chair: Sen. Keith Langseth 3:30 p.m. Room 123 Capitol Agenda: S.F. 2-Langseth: Omnibus bonding bill. MONDAY, April 14, 2003 5:00 PM Meeting Time Note: Or one hour after the last body adjourns, whichever is later Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement Room: 500N State Office Building Chair: Rep. Steve Smith Age nda: Final action on proposed legislation laid over for potential inclusion in the 2003 omnibus retirement bill. TUESDAY, April 15, 2003 2:30 PM Committee: House Regulated Industries Room: 5 State Office Building Chair: Rep. Torrey Westrom Bill(s) Added Age nda: I-IF 1493 (Dorman)/SF 1182 (Ourada) Municipal liquor store competition geographic restrict ions eliminated, bar hours extended to 2:00 a.m., uniform hour for off-sale of liquor provided in the state, and restriction on number of licenses issued by a municipality removed. For more information on city legislalive issue',, contact any member of Ihe I..,~ague of Minnesota Cities Inlera:overnmental Relations team. 65:1..281.1200 or 800.925.:1.122 - 1681 - ~ 17 Z00~ 13:48:31 ~ia Fax -> 9524?ZOGZO Legislature continues work on budget and tax bills Legislators left St. Paul for their districts earlier than normal this week with a long weekend for Easter and Passover. There were no hearings scheduled for Thursday, Friday or Monday. Both bodies will kick it back into gear on Tuesday with floor sessions and more hearings. For many legislators it will be one of the last chances to be home among constituents and test the political winds. The scheduled adjournment date is May 19'h. -FridayFax- A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities April 17, 2003 Page 1 $30 million for the wastewater infrastructure program, $12 million for greater Minnesota business development infrastructure grants, and $24.5 million for flood recovery in Roseau. With less than a month to go in the regular session, the Senate begins crafting together their omnibus bills next week with the Finance committee deadline of April 29th. This is the date by which a committee's omnibus bill needs to receive a favorable hearing in Senate Finance. The Senate Finance committee is the equivalent of the blouse Wa ys & Means committee. House budget committees spent the week putting together their various omnibus bills, taking public testirnony and marking up the bills late each night with amendments. Those bills will go onto Ways & Means next week. As usual, a number of these bills have had rnajor policy provisions go into them as amendments. This is often done to resurrect bills that are technically dead because they did not receive a hearing in the other body. On the Senate side, the Senate Finance Committee passed a $418 million bonding bill to the floor. Much of the spending in this year's proposal was part of the capital-bonding bill that passed last year, but that $357 million in projects was vetoed by Governor Ventura. The bill contains many projects that benefit local communities, including nearly $7 million for regional parks, $3.6 million for solid waste capital assistance grants, $20 million for the local road improvernent program, $2 million for greater Minnesota transit facilities, $10 million for North Star commuter rail, $13 million for the public safety radio cornmunication system build-out, over The Governor's LGA reform proposal is supposed to be out on Wednesday. The Senate plans to have a tax bill out on Tuesday that will only be made up of the non-controversial tax pieces. Those other pieces will likely come together as the bill is marked up and amended later in the week. The House Tax committee will have their TIF hearing towards the end of the week. Pieces of the blouse omnibus tax bill should be out for public reaction by the end of next week as well. Governor's Appointments Today Gov. Pawlenty made official his appointments to head three important state agencies. Tim Mark is the new commissioner for the MN Housing Finance Agency. Department of Labor & Industry will be headed up by new commissioner Scott Bremer. The new commissioner for the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board/Agency will be Sandy Layman. I--Iearings of interest (Lynn put this blurb about the fluctuating schedules ahead of AF's scheduled items) Check the legislative website for the most up-to- date information. Most of these are loosely scheduled post-floor sessions and will go later into the evening. Senate Tax Committee (Tuesday 4/22- Friday 4/25 Chair: Sen. Lawrence Posemiller 9 a.m. Room 15 Capitol Agenda: To be announced. For more informalion on cily legislalive issues, conlac! any member of Ihe League of Minnesota ¢ilies Inle~governmenlal Relalions learn. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1682- ~r 17 2883 13:49:12 Yi~ ?ax -> 9524?ZBGZO ~&~ini~ra~o~ h§e 002 0£ 802 -FridayFax- A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities Fireworks fee provision tucked into two House bills Two House committees have inserted provisions into omnibus funding bills that would cap the fees cities could impose on vendors selling consumer fireworks. The proposal began as a bill, I-IF 800 (I-Iackbarth, R-Cedar), that was introduced in response to excessive fees adopted by some cities after last year's legalization of consumer fireworks including sparklers, party poppers and snakes. The most recent version of the bill would cap the allowable fee at $100 per vendor selling from a permanent structure and $350 per vendor selling from a temporary structure. Presently, cities charge between $0 and $1,100. The bill was approved by House policy committees but was never heard in the Senate. By tucking the provision into the I-louse State Government omnibus bill (I-IF 749) and the Economic Development, Housing, Jobs and State Governrnent Finance on'mibus bill (I-IF 748), the House will force the Senate to deal with the measure. Hearings of interest April 17, 2003 Page 2 TUESDAY~ April 22? 2003 Committee: House Capital Investment Room: Basement Hearing Room, State Office Building Time: Meeting Time Note: After Session Chair: Rep. Phil Krinkie Agenda: HF 627 (Kuisle) Transportation funding provided, and money appropriated. HF 1048 (Penas) Trade and economic development, housing finance agency, natural resources, and transportation funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated. Committee: Senate Transportation Policy and Budget Divisio n Room: Room 107 Capitol Time: 3:30 p.m Chair: Sen. Dean E. Johnson Agenda: Presentation of committee omnibus transportation bill. S.F. ll03-Moua: Common interest communities' right of way acquisition. Cities maintain the fees are needed to cover the costs associated with compliance checks, education and inspections relating to the sale ora regulated product. Proponents of the measure testified that current law allows for too much variation between cities, and that some cities are abusing their authority by using the fees as a way to discourage retailers from selling fireworks. The provision also would restrict cities from requiring fireworks sellers to purchase additional liability insurance. Testifiers stated that some cities have adopted licensing provisions that require liabilily coverage of $1 million. The insurance requirements, coupled with the fees, make selling fireworks cost prohibitive for retailers. WEDNESDAY~ April 23~ 2003 Committee: House Transportation Finance Room: 200 State Office Building Time: 8:15 AM Chair: Rep. William Kuisle Agenda: HF1071 (Seifert) Paved two-lane highway speed limits of 65 miles per hour during daytime and 55 miles per hour during nighttime provided. HF1233 (Tingelstad) Northstar commuter rail line funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated. I-IFl129 (Kuisle) Utility relocations necessitated by design-build transportation projects regulated. Committee: Senate State Government Budget Division Room: Room 118 Capitol Time: 9 a.m. Chair:.Sen. Jane Ranum Agenda: Omnibus state government budget bill. For more information on ally legialaliv¢ [aauca, ¢onlacl any member of lh~ League of Minnesota Cil[ea Inlcrgove~'nrnenlal Relations learn. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.3.122 - 1683- PARK AND OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES April 10, 2003 Present: Chair Susan Taylor, Co-Chair Derrick Hentz, CommissionerS John Beise and Gene Hostetler, and Council Representative Bob Brown Also Present: Parks Director Jim Fackle; and Recoi'ding Secretary Denice Widmer Absent and Excused: Norman Domholt and Ron Motyka Citizens Present: Don Landon Colleen Furhman Kassie Ricke Stacy and Ryan Johnson Mark Hanus Jerry and Karen Wahl Audrey Heinsch Marshall Saunders 6191 Sa 6350 St 6125 Mill Lane ill Lane 6189 Sug lgar Mill L~ Lr Mill Lane 11 Lane Meeting called to order by Chair .an Taylor at Beise. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL MOTION by Brown to a' Motion carried. APPROVAL MOTION Brown. 13,_2003: s. SECOND by the MARCH 13~ 2003' ular Meeting Minutes. SECOND by 2. A( e 4. DISC1 Fackler t represented the to grant the re Brief discussion by OF TAX FORFEITED LAND Ihe background on this application. Mark Hanus plicants and gave a brief presentation. MOTION by Brown of property to the three abutting owners SECOND by Beise. David Osmek followed. Motion Carried. 5. DISCUSS: ROTTLUND PARK Fackler gave brief update. During the discussion that followed, it became apparent that a compromise in the design is needed. Residents and commissioners will hold a separate meeting for further discussion. Fackler will stake out the area and bring new plans to the May meeting to which residents will be invited. - 1684- 6. DISCUSS: HIGHLAND PARK NOTIFICATION AND MAILING park. Fackler requested that an invitation to May 8 meeting to discuss playground equipment replacement be mailed out to residents within 350' of the park. MOTION by Brown to mail out invitation to residents within 350' of the SECOND by Beise. Motion carried. 7. REVIEW: GOALS Taylor gave brief overview of goals and asked that it be added to May's agenda. 8. DISCUSS: LEGACY Brown gave a brief overview of the legacy 1; he would get further information on the program from Ducks in Fairmont. o REVIEW: MAY AGENDA CALENDAR Discuss: Rottlund Park Site Plans Discuss: Highland Play Structure w/re~, Discuss: Legacy Review: Goals Discuss: Capital Outlay REPORTS: City Council Representative Brown gave brief corridor trail system Parks Director Fackler gave Skate Park Ho: date. Brown Meetin at 9 ~g. SECOND by Motyka. Motion carried. - 1685- April 10, 2003 To All Dreamwood Addition Property Owners: This letter is to update you on the Dreamwood lakeshore issue. As you know, our group of abutting property owners desire to change the lake access and city-run dock program to be more like how Woodland Point is managed now .The City of Mound had originally ' asked all Dreamwood homeowners for a mutually supported agreement on inlander access rights before it would vacate the shoreline. After several meetings, abutters and non-abutters could not reach a mutually acceptable solution. As a result, our group filed suit against the City of Mound-who currently claim ownership-to resolve the impasse of land ownership. The suit's text was focused very specifically on the land ownership aspect, and did not include language discussing inlanders' access rights. Some therefore drew the conclusion that abutters were trying to totally eliminate inlanders' access to the lake. Actually, all of our group have always agreed that Dreamwood inlanders should continue to have access to the lake, to be able to enjoy it essentially as before. The Citizens for Commons Committee (representing some inlanders) has retained a lawyer. The court has allowed their participation in the suit, acknowledging that inlanders have interests that deserve representation. The case has been referred to out-of-court mediation~ Retired judge Robert Schiefelbein will be the mediator. The mediationis open to all Dreamwood Addition property 0wnerS} Your attendan~e is encouraged but not mandatory. If mediation is successful, the .suit Can be COncIuded without further major litigation expense. If mediation fails to provide an agreement, thecourt has ~trUcted our group to change our filing and must individually name and serve all Dreamwood inlanders property owners separately as defendants in the suit. The court-ordered step of individually naming all inlanders as defendants is something that will be inconvenient and potentially expensive to all Dreamwood residents. We all want to avoid that! Therefore we strongly encourage all property owners to attend the mediation session to get a full understanding of what is being proposed and how it does and does not impact you as a resident and homeowner. Mediation is scheduled for Friday, April 18th at 9A.M. at St. John's Lutheran Church, 2451 Fairview Lane in Mound. If you cannot attend, but would like to know more, please feel free to contact the parties listed below. To refi'esh your memory, our group has previously proposed the following: 1. The court recognize lakeshore abutters have fee simple title oflakeshore adjacent to our homes 2. Maintain legally protected, access to.the lake for all Dreamwood residents in an "access at ends of street program" similar to Woodland Point. 3. Continuation of a City- managed dock program similar to Woodland Point, with participation reserved for Dreamwood residents only - 1686- In addition to the above, our group will present research addressing concerns about a settlement's potential impact on inlander property values. We think you will be relieved and pleased with this information. Our group is also are ready to present additional new ideas on si~cmificantly improved and expanded lake access rights for all inland property owners. It is to everyone's benefit to understand the issues and have mediation succeed. For additional information or to share concerns that you want addressed in the mediation session, please feel free to contact any of the following: Citizens for Commons ~ www. citizensforcommons.org Dreamwood abutters: John and Kelly Anderson Phil and Julie Bowman Tom and Bonnie Menken Matt Mizerny Jason Sasanfar 472-4070 472-3817 472-1591 472-1245 472-0160 Thank you for taking time to read this update. We hope to see you at St. John's. Sincerely, Abutting property owners as represented by the above - 1687- General Fund $1,397,186 CDBG 1,289 Area Fire Protection Services 294,311 Grant Revolving 0 Cemetery (6,375) Dock 261,000 PW Facility 72,234 G.O. Improvement Bonds 42,482 Commerce Place TIF (167,084) TIF 1-2 Notes 25,578 G.O. Bonds 2001 -A 3,793 G.O. Bonds 2001 - C 0 HRA Lease Rev Bonds (1,900) Capital Improvement 1,335,761 MSA (21,907) Sealcoat 67,259 CDB 1,267 Downtown TIF 1-2 (2,074,336) HRA Public Safety Bldg (28,217) Water 1,124,800 Sewer 1,116,835 Liquor Store 150,897 Recycling 56,753 Storm Water 314,754 Fire Relief (18,723) HRA 0 Note: The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger. The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers, encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc. Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included. A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties. In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds available for spending. 04/14~2003 CashReportCouncil Gino - 1688- CITY OF MOUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT March 2003 25.00% GENERAL FUND Council Promotions City Manager/Clerk Elections Finance Assessing Legal City Hall Building & Srvcs Computer Police Emergency Prepardeness Planning/Inspections Streets Parks Transfers Cable TV Contingencies March 2003 YTD PERCENT BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED 75,990 2,203 12,338 63,652 16.24% 3,750 0 0 3,750 0.00% 257,150 19,450 54,620 202,530 21.24% 1,080 0 0 1,080 0.00% 215,100 10,966 43,586 171,514 20.26% 79,630 7 15 79,615 0.02% 135,550 18,243 18,079 117,471 13.34% 172,650 73,439 84,584 88,066 48.99% 28,640 21 2,724 25,916 9.51% 1,260,850 89,975 243,563 1,017,287 19.32% 7,130 22 716 6,414 10.04% 270,010 22,929 68,556 201,454 25.39% 671,450 44,392 110,608 560,842 16.47% 361,130 22,309 45,596 315,534 12.63% 203,350 16,946 50,838 152,512 25.00% 50,000 20 20 49,980 0.04% 44,290 530 530 43,760 1.20% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 3.837.750 321.452 736.373 3.101.377 19.19% Area Fire Service Fund 510,410 Cemetery Fund 9,140 Dock Fund 141,230 TIF 1-2 0 Water Fund 679,880 Sewer Fund 1,121,210 Liquor Fund 495,850 Recycling Fu nd 163,310 Storm Water Utility 92,910 40,122 72,136 438,274 14.13% 945 1,553 7,587 16.99% 8,098 11,915 129,315 8.44% 18,704 39,482 (39,482) 77,371 152,162 527,718 22.38% 103,349 317,893 803,317 28.35% 37,656 125,372 370,478 25.28% 9,091 27,011 136,299 16.54% 341 18,412 74,498 19.82% Exp-02 04114/2003 Gino - 1689- CiTY OF MOUND BUDGET REVENUE REPORT March 2003 25.00% GENERAL FUND Taxes Business Licenses Non-Business Licenses and Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Court Fines Other Revenue Transfers from Other Funds Charges to Other Departments March 2003 YTD PERCENT BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE _RECEIVED 2,290,070 0 0 (2,290,070) 0.00% 6,930 1,150 2,050 (4,880) 29.58% 263,150 14,514 60,422 (202,728) 22.96% 502,930 20,165 67,631 (435,299) 13.45% 97,800 6,927 34,709 (63,091) 35.49% 117,000 6,294 13,702 (103,298) 11.71 % 215,290 4,647 66,074 (149,216) 30.69% 0 0 0 0 ERR 14,000 1,986 2,991 (11,009) 21.36% TOTAL REVENUE 3.507.170 55.683 247,579 (3.259.591) 7.06% FIRE FUND CEMETERY FUND DOCK FUND WATER FUND SEWER FUND LIQUOR FUND RECYCLING FUND STORM WATER UTILITY 550,410 51,790 169,947 (380,463) 30.88% 5,000 0 25 (4,975) 0.50% 103,400 29,130 137,876 34,476 133.34% 625,000 38,305 75,659 (549,341) 12.11% 1,100,000 87,313 179,357 (920,643) 16.31% 2,110,000 145,674 387,341 (1,722,659) 18.36% 129,000 7,292 14,856 (114,144) 11.52% 115,000 9,640 19,494 (95,506) 16.95% 04114~2003 rev01 Gino - 1690- CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association . .. ~...,.. Attorneys at Law i..' ' : ". "...'' '~'.: :;~ '~.' · '~:. i'=, ,(653)i :~52-.5'000: .i 5.'.... -,'..1.::.. -. '.-',~i(,: 5': .-:-Joh~ r. ~<env Roger N. Knutson ' ..... .......... : ....... ' ........ : ' ' " "Miitthcw J. Foli Whom~ M. Scott ' Fax (651) 452/5550 Soren M. Merrick Elliott B. Knetsch Marguerite M. McCarron Joel J. Jamnik Gina M. Bran& Andrea McDowell Poehler March 31, 2003 Matthew K. Brokl* *Also ~/n Wtm>n~ Mr. Wayne Sarapo Project Manager - VIC 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Mr. Mark Koplitz Project Leader - VPIC 520 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Re: W.A.F. Tdt. Dear Mr. Sarapo and Mr. Koplitz: : "InMay of 2001, W.A.F.T.A., entered.iht0 th~ V~blUntary Investigation and'Clean uP'.~ Program ("VIC") administered by the Minnes6~ pOllution Control Agency ("MPCA") to " address the potential contamination issues present' on W.A.F.T.A.'s site. W.A.F.T.A.'s decision to enter into VIC was based on its sincere desire to appropriately resolve all issues associated with the potential contamination of the site. Since joining VIC, W.A.F.T.A. has prepared an investigation work plan which was submitted to the MPCA for their review and approval in February of 2002. W.A.F.T.A. also performed a historical document review to identify and determine each of the responsible parties to the environmental liabilities at the site. Upon entering VIC, W.A.F.T.A. has also attempted to negotiate with the Corp. of Engineers (on behalf of the Department of Defense), Reliant Energy and Xcel Energy to secure a cost sharing agreement between the parties to complete the remaining investigation and potential remediation of the site. W.A.F.T.A. has been unsuccessful in securing a cost sharing agreement with these parties. Unfortunately, W.A.F.T.A. will not be able to complete the required investigation without a cost sharing agreement in place. At this point in time, it does not appear that W.A.F.T.A. will be able to secure such an agreement from any of the parties. Based on the lack of cooperation and financial commitment from the other potentially responsible parties, W.A.F.T.A. has decided to remove themselves from the VIC program. Suite 317 · Eagandale Office Center · 1380 Corporate Center Curve · Eagan, MN 55121 - 1691 - Mr, Wayne Sarap0 Mr. Mark Koplitz March 31, 2003 Page Two On behalf of W.A.F.T.A. I would like to thank the MPCA for all of their assistance. Please feel free to contact me at 651-234-6217 if you have any questions. Very truly yours, CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Soren M. Mattick SMM:dmo cc: Mr. Jerry Winslow, Xcel Energy Mr. Glenn Miller, Reliant Energy/Minnegasco Mr. Thomas Traey, Department of Army - Corps of Engineers Crreg Pederson, Mound Fire Department Donald Uram, City of Eden Prairie Chris Thompson, Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. - 1692- THSTAI TEIl I AIL April 7, 2003 Ms. Kandis Hanson Manager City of Mound City Hall 5341 Maywood Rd Mound, MN 55364-1627 Dear Ms. Hanson: The Northstar Corridor Development Corridor Authority (NCDA) recently commissioned an independent economist to conduct an economic analysis of the Northstar commuter rail project. The analysis concluded that Northstar is the most cost-effective and cost-beneficial transportation option for the fastest growing corridor in the state. At the request of Governor Pawlenty, the NCDA was asked to provide a detailed brief'rog about Northstar to the Governor and his key staff. Among the key points presented to Governor Pawlenty, they include: N0rthstar benefits outweigh its c°sts, : ' .~., '~ ~ .:~ ..... · The State of MinnesOta will realize benefits, of $2.97 for every dollar it spendS on'NorthStar. For every federal, state and local dollar spent, $1.15 in benefits will be Created. Northstar commuter rail is the most cost-effective choice for this corridor. A comparison of the construction and operation costs over 15 years for transportation options found: - A busway would be 50% more expensive than Northstar - New lane on Highway 10 would be double the cost Northstar commuter rail will move people. Current ridership projections show that Northstar will carry 5,000 passengers each day, which is the equivalent of lY: lanes of traffic during both morning and evening peak traffic times. Northstar commuter rail can be operational in four years. Because Northstar will operate on existing railroad, the construction time for Northstar commuter rail is substantially less than building new roads or busways. In addition, the environmental analysis and 30 percent of the engineering on Northstar have already been completed. Passengers would be able to ride Northstar commuter rail as soon as fall 2006. State legislators are loohng for smart, cost-effective solutions to congestion - Northstar can provide that solution in the corridor frOm the St. Cloud/Rice area t° MinneapOlis. But we,need the state.to cqm.,t, to 9ur reqg~St for $1,23"milli0n in bon .ding this year 'to access $151 milli0n Of matching fUnds from ~the federal government, Northstar Corridor Development Authority 21 oo 3rd AVenUe, Anoka, Minnesota 55303'2265 -888-478-NSTAR (6782) (763) 323-5700 Fax: (763) 323-5682 www. mn.- 1 693- oard.com It is important to note that the Northstar request is not competing with local governments for highway dollars or local government aid. In particular, the federal funding comes from Federal Transit Administration appropriations intended only for transit projects - no federal highway dollars will be diverted by Northstar. The NCDA has continued its discussion with Governor Pawlenty and Lieutenant Governor Molnau. We share the common goal of finding the smartest, most cost-effective transportation solution for the corridor. We are confident the new information demonstrates that Northstar commuter rail is the best option for our area. Enclosed is information that highlights Mr. Anton's findings. If you are interested in a copy of Anton's complete report, you can download it from our web site at www.mn-GetOnBoard.com. Sincerely, Duane Grandy - 1694- The Northstar Corridor needs transportation improvements · Twin Cities-to-St. Cloud/Rice is the fastest growing corridor in Minnesota · Growth in population, housing and jobs overwhelms the transportation system · High accident rate and longer travel times affecting corridor residents and businesses · No scheduled, funded highway solution in the 20-year plan from the Minnesota Department of Transportation Northstar commuter rail is the best transportation option for this corridor According to Paul Anton, economist and member of the Council of Advisors in Minnesota: The benefits of Northstar commuter rail outweigh the costs · $1.15 of benefits for every $1.00 invested by state, local and governments · $2.97 of benefits are generated for every $1.00 invested by the state · Benefits can be delivered to the public as early as fall 2006 Northstar is the most cost-effective transportation choice for this corridor · Cost comparison of construction and 15 years of operations: - Northstar: $502 million - Highway 10 upgrade: $1.02 billion - Busway: $749 million · Less expensive to add additional capacity to commuter rail transportation options Economic federal than other Northstar commuter rail will work · 77% of residents support Northstar- 82% would use the service · Northstar line moves people to where they want to go: - Jobs - Higher education - Shopping and entertainment - Medical care · Commuter rail provides value to the public: - Clean, safe vehicles - Convenient park and ride lots - Reasonable cost of service - Travel not delayed by weather or traffic congestion "[Northstar] is as sound a piece of work as I have seen in many years of examining projects." Paul Weyrich, Free Congress Foundation, Washington D.C. - 1695- Commuter Rail is the Best Transportation Option for the Northstar Corridor Commuter rail is the most cost-effective choice Comparison of construction and 15 years of operating costs Northstar will carry the same number of people that an upgrade to the highway would carry at around one-third the cost $1,200 $1,000 $800 $600 $400 $200 $o $1,022 $749 Northstar Busway Hwy 10 Upgrade [] Construction Costs [] 15 Years Operating Costs Adding additional capacity to Northstar commuter rail is also less expensive than other transportation. Cost to add 25% capacity: · Northstar: $25.8 million · Busway: $39.2 million · Adding a lane to Hwy 10:$1,090 million Analysis by independent economist Paul Anton, compares: · Commuter rail: 1,800 passengers/hour; 82-mile stretch from Rice to Minneapolis · Adding a lane to Hwy 10:1,210 passengers/hour; from 35W to Big Lake · Dedicated busway: 1,800 passengers/hour; from Minneapolis to Big Lake Northstar's benefits exceed its costs Benefit-cost ratio: A benefit of $1.15 will be realized for every federal, state and local dollar spent. Each dollar spent by the State of Minnesota will realize a benefit of $2.97. Northstar Corridor Development Authority 2100 3= Avenue, Anoka, Minnesota 55303-2265 (763) 323-5700 1-877-478-NSTAR (6782) Fax: (763) 323-5682 www.m n-GetOnBoard.com -1696- ~p~ 84 Z003 14:26:45 V~a Fax -> 9524728628 fi&ministrator Page 801 0£ OflZ 145 University Avenue West, St. Puul, MN 55103-2044 Phone: (651) 281-1200. (800) 925-i122 Fux: (651) 281-±299 Web Site: http://www.hnnc.org To: LMC Member Cities From: Jim Miller, Executive Director Date: April 4, 2003 RE: City Day at the Capitol Hopefully, you are now well aware of the Day at the Capitol planned for April 9'h. If you have not yet decided whether to attend, I want to encourage you to do so in the strongest possible terms. While there are encouraging signs that your efforts to communicate directly with your legislators are being heard, much work remains. The League has been meeting with legislators, testifying, and working with key administration officials to ensure that they understand the severe impact the Governor's and Senate's proposals would have on your ability to fund and manage your cities. The Day at the Capitol is one more, important, means of reinforcing this message. Certainly the proposals to cut Local Government Aid and the Market Value Homestead Credit would affect cities differently. Some have more at risk in this part of the debate than do others. Regardless, all cities would face severe restrictions on their ability to raise levies and issue debt. Taken together, the ability of officials in every Minnesota city to meet the needs of their communities will be severely limited if the Governor's plan or the Senate's freeze proposal prevail. On April 9th, we will brief city officials on the status of budget negotiations and discuss key messages you can use when you meet with your legislators. We will also be holding a press conference where we will talk both about how these proposed funding cuts would affect services and restrict your ability to govern through the onerous levy limit and debt restriction provisions. Our intent is to make sure legislators, the media, and citizens fully understand what these proposals would mean to the quality of life in our cities. To further make this point, we will have city officials, business representatives and citizens from several cities available to share their specific stories with the media. I very much appreciate how difficult it is for many of you to come to St. Paul. But, I also can think of no more important time in my ten years with the League for you to come to the Capitol and share your opinions with legislators. Within the next few weeks, the Legislature will make significant movement toward resolving the deficit. We have made strides in convincing the Legislature to rnove away from these proposals, but your continual involvement will be crflcial. Your attendance on April 9th will make a difference! Our goal is to have 1,000 city officials and cornmunity representatives with us that day. To make that happen, we really do need you. You can find more information on the League's web site www.lmnc, or~... If you do decide to come, please let us know (651-281-1200) so we can have a lunch for you. AN EQUAL OPPO RTUN 1TY/AFFI RM ATI VE ACTION EMPLOYER - 1697- apr 84 Z083 14;ZT;ZZ Via Fax -> 95Z47Z06Z0 fldainis%rator Page flBZ Of flBZ City Day at the Capitol Thank you for your interest and participation in City Day at the Capitol slated for April 9. The League is encouraged by the strong turnout and hope registrations continue to grow for this very important event. Please begin assembling on the Capitol steps so that the press conference can start on time. In addition, due to the strong turnout, we ask for your patience and understanding. Staff will make every effort to accommodate participants and to ensure things go as smoothly as possible. Because of the large turnout expected, we will be holding two briefing sessions and will assign participants to "Group A" or "Group B" as they arrive. Aeenda 10:30 a.m.- Registration (LMC, 145 University Ave. W) 11:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. Group A- Legislative briefing (Christ Lutheran Church, 105 University Ave. W) Group B - Box lunch (LMC) 12:00 p.m.- 1:00 p.m. Group A- Box lunch (LMC) Group B - Legislative briefing (Christ Lutheran Church, 105 University Ave. W) 2:15 p.m.- Assemble on front steps of Capitol 2:30 p.m. - Press conference, Capitol steps Note: Participants are encouraged to make appointments with legislators in between legislative briefing/lunch and the press conference, or after the press conference. Directions to the Lea~lue The League is located in St. Paul, one-half mile north of 1-94 and two blocks west of the State Capitol on the corner of Rice and University. Traveling east or west on 1-94, take Marion (Kellogg) north. Follow Marion to Sherburne. Turn right onto Sherburne and go one block to Rice. Go right onto Rice for one block to University. Go right onto University. The first driveway on the right is the main entrance for parking. Parking All participants should come to the League parking lot, where they will be provided parking permits and directed to reserved parking areas. It is critical that all participants stop at the League to get parking perrnits and directions to ensure vehicles are not ticketed or towed. - 1698- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, April 9, 2003 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster READING OF MINUTES- 3/12/03 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 3/26/03 LMCD Regular Board Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item', in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS · Sun Star Cruises, Inc., new on-sale intoxicating liqu0rliCense application for the charter boat, Sunstar~ 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration City of Minnetonka Beach, new multiple dock license application to reConfigure the non-conforming facility under LMCD Code Section 2.015. 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration Michael & Donna Wallace, vadance application from LMCD Code for. dock length requirements. 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration WATER STRUCTURES A) (*) 2003 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends approval of 2003 renewal, without change, multiple dock license applications for Minnetonka Portable Dredging, Sailors World Marina, Smithtown Bay Association~ and Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District; B) Additional Business; - 1699- ~ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, April 9, 2003 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster READING OF MINUTES- 3/12/03 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 3/26/03 LMCD Regular Board Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS · Sun Star Cruises, Inc., new on-sale intoxicating liquorlicense application for the charter boat~ Sunstar. · 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration City of Minnetonka Beach, new multiple dock license application to reconfigure the non-conforming facility under LMCD Code Section 2.015. 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration Michael & Donna Wallace, vadance application from LMCD Code for dock length requirements. 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration WATER STRUCTURES A) (*) 2003 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends approval of 2003 renewal, without change, multiple dock license applications for Minnetonka Portable Dredging, Sailors World Marina, Smithtown Bay Association~ and Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District; B) Additional Business; - 1700- '~ 2. EWMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE': A) Update from Chair on requesting funding from the MCWD for potential funding of the LMCD EWM Harvesting Program; B) Staff update on the possible purchase of high-speed transport equipment for the 2003 EWM Harvesting Program (handout); C) Additional Business; 3. FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (4/1/03 - 4/15/03) (handout); B) February financial summary and balance sheet (handout); C) Additional Business; 4. SAVE THE LAKE A) (*) Minutes from the 3/11/03 "Save the Lake" Advisory Committee Meeting; B) 3/11/03 "Save the Lake" Advisory Committee Meeting Report; C) Additional Business; 5. LAKE USE & RECREATION A) 2003 Liquor Licenses, staff recommends approval of renewal Intoxicating Liquor, Wine, and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License applications as outlined in 4/9/03 staff memo (handout); B) Additional Business; 6. ADMINISTRATION A) Consideration of draft LMCD Resolution 104; B) Additional Business; 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9'. NEW BUSINESS 10.ADJOURNMENT -1701 - DRAFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Foster called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Lili McMillan, Orono; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Orr Burma, Mound; Miles Canning, Greenwood; Paul Knudsen, Minnetdsta; Tom Seuntjens, Uinnetonka Beach; Herb Suer[h, Woodland;. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Jose Valdesuso, Excelsior; Katy Van Hercke, Minhetonka; Victoria has no appointed member. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster There were no Chair Announcements. LeFevere administered the oath of office to Miles Canning. He was seated as the new representative on the Board of Directors from the City of Greenwood. Foster welcomed Canning on behalf of the Board. READING OF MINUTES. 2/19/03 Regular Board Meeting Babcock recommended one change to the minutes. In the first paragraph, third condition on page 10 to delete the' word "requiring" and to insert the Words "or require any". MOTION: Babcock moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the minutes from the 2/19/03 Regular Board Meeting aS amended. VOTE: Ayes (7), Abstained (2; Canning and Skramstad); motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS. Persons in attendance, subjects not on the agenda. There were no comments from persons in attendance on subjects not on the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA. Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. Nybeck stated agenda item 2B should be removed from the consent agenda because staff was unable to complete the minutes. Babcock stated-he did not feel comfortable approving agenda items under the consent agenda if they were not mailed out with the regular paCket and were included in the handout packet. He explained it does not allow the Board to review or discuss the items. ' - 1702- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 12, 2003 Page 2 The consensus of the Board was to change staff procedure so if agenda items are not included in the mailed Board packet and are treated as handouts the day of the Meeting, those items should not be on the consent agenda. Seuntjens moved, Skramstad seconded to approve the Consent agenda removing agenda item 28. Motion carded unanimously. Items so approved include: lB, 2003 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends approval of 2003 renewal without change multiple dock license applications as outlined in 3/5/03 staff memo; and lC, Terry Nagel, staff recommends Board approval to refund $67.30 of $250 deposit for approved variance application, 3B January financial summary and balance sheet. · Tallen & Baertschi, review of Lake Minnetonka prosecution matters with Steve Tallen. Foster introduced Steve Tallen, LMCD Prosecuting Attomey. He welcomed Tallen on behalf of the Board and asked for an overview. Tallen stated that the number of cases on the lake have been going down since 2000, noting this trend may be a function of the Change of philosophy of the Hennepin County Sheriffs Water Patrol because there seems to be a decrease in the number of citations issued and a larger emphasis on education. He reported that the number of drunken boating and drunken snomobiling court cases decreased this past year mainly because of the weather. There has been a rumor that there is movement to close the Ridgedale Courthouse as a budget cutting measure. If this were to happen, the cases currently heard at the Ridgedale Courthouse would be transferred either to the downtown Courthouse or the Courthouse in Edina or Robbinsdale (temporad'lY until the neW Brooklyn Center courthouse is built). There is a fear that the Chief Judge Kevin Burke of Hennepin County District Court. may unilaterally make the decision to close the courthouse and there have been some cities that haye passed resolutions stating they would like to be involved in the process if there is movement to close the Ridgedale Courthouse so they can voice their concerns before the decision is made. The cities in the western suburbs that have cases heard at the courthouse could be greatly affected if the Ridgedale Courthouse closes because it will 9ause higher costs for travel time and lost patrol time for officers having to appear in court. The effect on Lake '~innetonka could be lost time that Water Patrol deputies are on the water because they are spending more time going to court. The closing of the Ridgedale Courthouse could also affect the District defendants that are typically from the Lake Uinnetonka area because it would be less convenient for them. There is the potential~ that the District and other cities that I represent may be transferred to different courthouses and I may not be able to handle cases efficiently so there may be an increase of attorney fees or the district may hav(~' to find a new prosecuting attomey. If the District feels that the Courthouse potentially closing would have a negative effect, the District should write a letter or pass a resolution expressing aconcem that them should be an organized p~oceSs in making the decision to close the courthouse. The consensus of the Board was to pass a resolution asking Chief Judge Kevin Burke of Hennepin County. District Court that the LMCD WOuld like to be involved in the process if there is movement to clOse the Ridgedale Courthouse. MOTION: Canning moved, BabcOCk seconded to direct attorney to prepare a draft resolution asking Hennepin County Distdct Court that the District would like to be involved in the process if there is movement to close the Ridgedale Courthouse. Seuntjens stated he did not think the closing of the Ridgedale Courthouse would have a large impact on the District. He believed' that the cities and the Hennepin County Sheriffs Water Patroithat would be directly impacted by the clOsing Should address the situation. - 1703- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 12, 2003 Page 3 Tallen stated he just wanted to make the Board aware of the potential situation so decisions are not made without giving all parties engaged the opportunity to be involved in the discussion before it was too late. Babcock stated he preferred the preparation of a letter stating the District would like to have the opportunity to give input in the decision making process. VOTE: Ayes (7), Nays (2; Babcock and Seuntjens); motion carried. The BOard thanked Talien for giving an update on prosecution matters. PUBLIC HEARING · Trillium Bay HOA, new multiple dock license application to reconfigure 17 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 850' of continuous shoreline. Foster opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. and asked for background from staff, Harper made the following comments: · Trillium Bay HOA has submitted a new multiple dock license application for Board consideration. Currently, the site is approved for 17 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on approximately 850' of continuous shoreline. The site is considered a legal conforming facility with a BSU density of 1:50'. With the new multiple dock application, the applicant has proposed to reconfigure BSU #1 by offsetting it from the main walkway towards shore. · Since the applicant has proposed to add structure to the existing dock, a new multiple dock license, with publ'ic headng, is required. Staff has evaluated the proposed site plan and has determined that all structure and' bO'at storage is contained within the site's authorized dock use area. · Staff has evaluated the proposed site Plan' that has accompanied the application submitted to verify whether a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) needed to be prepared. Staff has determined that there would be 19,778.50 square feet of dock structure and maneuvering space associated with this proposed site A mandatory EAW does not need to be prepared for the proposed application because the Environmental QUality Board rules do not require a mandatory F_AW until the cumulative expansion exceeds 20,000 square feet for structure and maneuvering space. · The MN DNR and the City of Minnetrista were provided a copy of the new multiple dock license application on 2/26/03. Staff had received comments from Nate Sparks, Zoning Administrator for the City of Minnetrista. He made the following comments: "The Tdllium Bay HOA has a proposed configuration change [with the city of Uinnetrista] that has not increased the number of slips The City of Uinnetrista wil be reviewing the change on APdl 7, 2003 at the City CounCil Meeting. The change is a minor change of a previously approved configuration. Approve or deny be§ed on LUcD standards," To date, staff has not received comments back from' the MN DNR on the proposed' application. · He recommended Board approval of the proposed new multiple dock license application from Tdllium Bay HOA for the 2003 season. There being no comments, Foster closed the public hearing at 7:42 p.m. MOTION: BabcoCk moved, Skramstad seconded to approve the new multiple docklicense application for Trillium Bay HOA for the 2003 boating season. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. - 1704- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 12, 2003 Page 4 1. WATER STRUCTURES A. Dancing Waters HOA (North, Peninsula, Channel, and South sites), consideration of renewal, without change, multiple dock license applications for the 2003 season. Foster asked for background on the proposed application from staff. Harper made the following comments: Dancing Waters DoCk OwnerS Association has submitted 2003 renewal without change multiple dock license applications for their four dock sites. All four dock sites are considered legal, conforming sites for LMCD Code density requirements. · Typically, staff presents renewal without change multiple dock license applications to the Board for approval under the consent agenda. However, staff believed that the Board should be aware of special circumstances at these dock sites. · LMCD Code Section 1.06, Subd. 11 states that the issuance of a license or permit by the District does not relieve any person from the responsibility of obtaining required licenses, permits or other permission from any federal, state, municipal, county or other governmental agency having jurisdiction over the lake. Pdor to board approval of renewal multiple dock and distdct mooring area licenses, LMCD staff sends municipal zoning.certificates to the cities that the facilities are located in. These forms certify that the license applicant has met the zoning ordinance and any other city permit or license requirements of the City. The City of Minnetdsta did not sign the municipal Zoning certificates for the four Dancing Waters sites and wrote on those certificates that they were not approved due to subdivisi°n expiration. The city further explained that applicant has re-applied for a different configuration of the housing subdivision. · Depending on the outcome of the housing subdivision application with the city of Minnetdsta, there may be changes to the approved site plans. A representative from Dancing Waters had spoken with staff stating that an application going before the Minnetr sta City Oounc nApdl will sUbd vide the property to eleven large lots, which WOuld have approximately sixteen docks with around 38 BSU's, rather than 88, which is currently apprOved for the multiple dock sites. Multiple docklicenses may not be necessary if this subdivision i~ apPrOved bythe city, the individual lOts have normal fipadan rights and the shoreline is not dedicated to a multiple dock license and four boats or less are stored at each lot. · Staff recommends Board approval of the 2003 Dancing Waters Dock Owners Association renewal without change multiple dOck license applications for all four dock sites. BabcoCk stated he was concerned about apProVing the multiple dock licenses when the property use'will change and the doCkS will probably never be built to the approved configuration. LeFeVere stated that them have been times in the paSt when the BOard has made changes to District ordinances and si{eS that existed Or were licensed had been grandfathered. The applicant, s reason to renew the licenses could be to possibly Preserve their current rights if more restr ctive ordinances were adopted. BabCock stated that. he was a supporter of the two-year construct or abandon clause pertaining to special density licenses and stated he would have liked that it would also apply to all multiple dock licenses. LeFevere stated that there are several sites that do not fully construct their dock facilities because they do not have the demand for all the BSU's. If the construct clause pertained to this site. docks could have possibly been installed since 1997 Unneeded and taking' up space in the lake. Babcock stated that he would like citiZens to submit real applications, not applications to preserve rights, because the lake is public space and applicants do not have vested rights over time. - 1705- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 12, 2003 Page 5 LeFevere stated that with special density licenses, the applicants are getting five times the normal density requirements. At the Dancing Waters Sites, the applicant is meeting the most restrictive density rule of 1:50' so there is not as much of a risk in terms of density rights preservation. Babcock stated he had concerns with approving docks that could possibly not have access by land because of a subdivision change. MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the 2003 renewal without change multiple dock license applications for Dancing Waters HOA (North~ Peninsula, Channel, and South sites), subject to the number of docks installed cannot exceed the number of building permits issued. VOTE: Ayes (7), Nays (2; Babcock and Skramstad); motion carried. D. Additional Business. There was no additional business. Foster recommended that agenda item 4A be moved before agenda item 2. There were no objections by the Board members. LAKE USE & RECREATION A. Hennepin County Environmental Services, discussion of Lake Minnetonka projects with TonY Brough. Foster welcomed Tony Brough and asked him to give an overvieW of this agenda item. Brough stated that Hennepin County has printed a new updated Lake Minnetonka map. He stated there were some changes made to the map working with the MN DNR and District Staff, adding that the most significant change on the map was the buoy explanation section. In 2003, the state waterway markers were unified with the federal waterway marker rules. The largest change on Lake Uinnetonka will bethe red and white stdped point buoys changing to black and white stdped buoys consistent with federal buoy rules. He stated under the federal rules, red and white stdped buoys with a ball on top are identified as mid.channel buoys. Skramstad asked if these mid-channel buoys will either be replacing or be added to current red and green channel buoys on Lake Uinnetonka. Brough stated in 2003 he would not use the mid-channel buoys because of the chance that the Public may mistake those buoys with the old red and white striped point buoys used in the past. The mid~hannel buoys in the future in channels where water depth is not an issue. Babcock stated that it would take a while for the public to understand the change with the red and white stdped mid channel buoys. Brough stated if he uses the mid-channel buoys in the future, he would install signs on top of the buoys explaining the new meaning of mid-channel and pass close on either side. Skramstad asked how this would be communicated to the public. - 1706- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 12, 2003 Page 6 Brough stated that he is working with the Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol to send out a press release prior to the 2003 boating season. Babcock stated it might be beneficial to instal[ signs at the public accesses describing the meanings of the buoys on the Lake. Brough stated in the past, the District had sent a letter to Hennepin County designating where the slow buoys are to be placed. In the past three to four years, no changes have been made. He explained that since the Grays Bay Dam public access will be closed in 2003 to car-trailer boat launching, there is not the need of the minimum wake buoy near the access. He also questioned the need for the point buoy on the west-side of Grays Bay because he had determined from water depth measurements that the area has a gradual contour from shore and is not a point. He was not sure if it was there to discourage people from going into the milfoil or to keep people away from the causeway access. Foster stated that since the causeway public access will close in 2003, he believed that Hennepin County should not install point buoy ~7. MOTION: Skramstad moved, Burma seconded to request that Hennepin County Environmental Services remove :minimum wake buoy ~8 and point buoy #97. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Brough asked the Board if anyone knew why buoy # 63.in south-east Carsons Bay near the City of Deephaven public access has been installed at that location, adding that there was not a water depth concern in that area. Babcock asked if the point, buoy could be changed to a minimum wake buoy for the public launching boats from the City of Deephaven public access since Carsons Bay is entirely minimum wake. Brough stated that he could install a minimum wake sign at the City of Deephaven access in Carsons Bay. The consensus of the Board was to request that Hennepin County Environmental Services remove point buoy #63 from south-east Carsons Bay and a minimum wake sign be placed at the City of Deephaven Public Access in Carsons Bay. Brough requested stated he did not believe that the 24 buoys delineating "No-Anchoring" for the two safety lanes on the North side of Big Island are needed. He proposed installing 20 buoys, which could accomplish the same objective. Babcock stated he would be fine with that as long as the buoys closest to shore and furthest from shore remain in the same locations and the two sets of buoys be removed from the middle areas of the safety lanes. The consensus of the Board agreed with the recommendation of Brough and the feedback from Babcock. Brough stated he could not justify the need for point buoy #360, which is located on the west side of Cooks Bay. He stated he could not find a shallow point in that area and the water depth where the buoy is placed is approximately 20 feet. - 1707- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 12, 2003 Page? The consensus of the Board was to request that Hennepin County Environmental Services remove point buoy #360 located on the west side of COoks Bay. Brough stated that sOme buoys around the lake are not needed during normal Or high water times but the areas are problematiC during Iow water. He stated he doeS not want to eliminate those buoys and haVe to reinstall them in during Iow water periods because the public will get confused. Harper explained in 2002, twenty-Six solar lights were purchased with "Save The Lake" funds and were installed on channel buoys at four loCations around the Lake. He stated Brough dOnated his time to create mounting brackets and helped install and remove the lights. It was determined a new mounting system must be developed for the expansion of the solar light program in 2003. He stated the pilot project was given praise by the public and the Board decided to expand it in 2003, The Board inspected examples of the new and old one-mile lights and new two-mile lights. The consensus of the Board was to direct staff to order one-mile solar lights for the 2003 season, Brough stated a project repairing the Narrows Channel is scheduled for 2003 and the dredging of Libbs Lake Channel is planned. He explained that the dP-rapPing of the StubbS Channel and St. Albans Bay Channel might be planned for 2003, Foster thanked Tony Brough for meeting with the Board. B. Additional Business, There was no additiOnal business. Foster recommended that agenda item 8 be moved before agenda item 2 because there were members of the PUblic in the audience to speak about this agenda Item. There were no objections by the Board members. 8. OLD BUSINESS Update on 3/5103 Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee Meeting. Fosterr stated the SUb. committee recently met to discuss the 1974 density policy and the i991 Management Plan. There was good diSCUSs on at the meeting and not total agreement on what direction the diSCUssiOns Will proceed. He stated that the subcommittee would possibly hold several more meetings and that Board members and other interested parties, are welcOme to attend Babcock stated that there was discUSsion of a harborage ConcePt at this sub-committee meeting and that he could not find prior references to it in either the 1974 policy or the 1991 Management Plan. He believed that the subcommittee shOUld Continue diScusSing this concept further; however, the Management Plan currently states that new denSity should be located sotnewhe're else on the Lake if bays are currently too dense, He stated that he believed the general consensus of the subcommittee was that a moratorium on all new sPeCial density licenses would be in order until the subcommittee completes its work, adding that there were some on the sub- committee believed that the special density licenses that allow 1:10' density was where :the highest potential for density growth exists today, He encouraged feedback from the :BOard on'the moratorium concept. - 1708- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 12, 2003 Page 8 Foster stated he was opposed to the moratorium and believed that the subcommittee could get the work done analyzing and possibly amending the current boat density policies. The City of Deephaven is interested in expanding their docking program and has recently submitted a special density license application. He did not feel that the Board was in any jeopardy of applicants rushing applications in prior to the sub-committee addressing or updating the boat density policy. Babcock stated that he understood the City of Deephaven application was received after the sub-committee meeting but before this Board Meeting. He stated that he supported the cities efforts to provide docks for it's residents; however, the application appears to go against the current density policy and the discussions at the sub-committee meeting. He was concerned that the Board would review the Deephaven application under the old density policies and would not include any possible changes to them by the sub-committee.. He stated that the Board should base its decision on what is good for the Lake, not what is good for the City Of Deephaven. Based on this and the general consensus of the sub-committee, he believed that a moratorium would be appropriate at this time. Canning stated that the issues are very complex, and possibly a subcommittee should have been formed ten years ago and met periodically to keep the density policies current. Seuntjens' stated a moratorium could be warranted by the Board if it does not want a rush of new applications submitted pdor to any recommendations decisions by the sub-committee. If a moratorium is declared and deemed appropriate, there'should be a time limit on it and the sub-committee works toward a timely resolution. Babcock stated if high density of boat storage is allowed in one bay, it should be mitigated in other areas of the lake. He stated the subcommittee preliminarily discussed how allowing high density in some "harborage" bays would affect adjacent bays and the Lake as a whole. Foster stated there are wide range of philosophies amongst the 14 member cities, noting that some of the cities are seafaring communities that have large city docking programs with dense "harborage" bays. He stated other cities have adopted ordinances that have more restrictive density requirements that create very Iow boat storage density bays. Babcock agreed that the subcommittee should discuss the different phiiosOPhiesof the 14 member cities~ He explained that the 1974 policy and the 1991 Management Plan are in concert with each other that when a bay is overly crowded, density should not be added to those bays but to other areas of the Lake. Two higl~ growth areas cited in the 1991 Management Plan were commemial marinas and municipal docks. Skramstad asked what the Board was trying to accomplish this evening, Babcock stated his concern was that the Board was approving applications that go against wdtten policy. He explained ~at it is fine if the Board wants to change the policy; however, new applications should not be approved that are not consistent with existing policies until theyare changed. He believed that a moratorium was not necessarily a negative thing and that it would be appropriate to reconcile existing policies before new special density applications are considered by the Board. Mr, Tom Anderson~ Mayor of Deephaven, stated the. city has been working towards adding boat slips for their residents over the last couple of years. He explained that the city does not plan on adding slips in Carsons Bay behind the bridge in Burton Park because of neighborhood opposition; however, they propose to add 28 slips to the city area in St, Louis Bay as an altemative. He believed that the Distdct should not implement a moratorium until the Board knows what negative impact density has on the Lake. - 1709- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 12, 200: Skramstad asked Mayor Anderson when the city planned on constructing the new docks if the pending special density license application was approved by the District. Anderson stated that he believed that the new dock would probably be constructed for the 2004 boating season rather than for 2003. Skramstad stated that based on the feedback from Mayor Anderson, he believed that the sub-committee has some time to review the existing density policies and make possible recommendations on them to the Board. Babcock stated that the state law requires the District to process complete applications within 60 after a complete application has been received, with the District being able to extend it unilaterally an additional 60 days. This would apply to the pending special density license application submitted by the City of Deephaven and could have implications on the work of the sub-committee, unless Deephaven is willing to sign a waiver that states that they agree to an indefinite extension of the time period required by state law. MOTION: Babcock moved to place a moratorium on all new special density licenses that would result in an increase in Boat Storage Units (BSU's) for a pedod of nine months. The motion failed for lack of a second. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE A. Curfman Trucking and Repair, Inc., consideration of maintenance proposal for 2003 EWM Harvesting Program. Foster asked for an overview of this agenda item from staff. Nybeck stated that a maintenance proposal has been received from Curfman Trucking and Repair, Inc. for the 2003 EWM Harvesting Season. In 2001 and 2002, Curl=man Trucking and Repair, Inc. made significant improvements in the maintenance of the harvesting equipment. The proposal is for a fiat rate contract of $26,250.00 for a 22-week season from Apdl 15~ through SePtember 15~h. He stated the job duties would change for 2003 because the mechanic will not be responsible for two of the 1989 UMI harvesters because they are being traded in for the new harvester to be delivered this spring. Curfman Trucking and Repair has agreed to a limited amount of painting of existing equipment to lieu of maintenance not to be done in 2003 on these two harvesters. He recommended approval of Curfman Trucking and Repair, Inc. to serve as the 2003 EWM Harvesting Program Fleet Mechanic. MOTION: Skramstad moved, Suerth seconded to direct staff to prepare a contractual agreement with Curfman Trucking and Repair, Inc. to serve as 2003 EWM Harvesting Program Fleet MeChanic, for an amount of $26,250.00. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. C. 2J14/03 EWM/Exotics Task Fome Meeting Report. Suerth stated he would like to wait to discuss the 2/14/03 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting until the 3/26/03 Regular Board Meeting at which time the meeting minutes will be complete. D. Additional Business. Suerth asked for an update from Nybeck on the zebra mussel inspection program for 2003. -1710- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 12, 2003 Page 10 Nybeck stated that he spoken with Dick Osgood and that the LMA had not raised the $10,000 that they were targeting by mid March. Funds raised for the project to date include $5,000 the LMA has secured from the Legacy Foundation, $5,000 in the District exotic species budget, and possibly $2,000 from the Save the Lake Budget, The LMA is continuing its efforts to raise funds for the this pilot project in 2003 and a scaled back program from what was originally planned would be appropriate, adding that he would be meeting with Osgood in the near future to finalize the details of the program. FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers (2/16/03- 2~28~03) and (3/1/03 - 3/15/03), Skramstad reviewed the audit of vouchers as submitted. MOTION: Skramstad moved, McMillan seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. ADMINISTRATION A. Discussion of draft LMCD Data Practices Policy. Foster asked LeFevere for on overview of the agenda item. LeFevere explained that governmental agencies are required by law to have a data practices policy. The policy included in the packet is a model of a policy prepared by the Minnesota Department of Administration. He explained that the policy lists the kinds of private and confidential data that the District maintains and the Board might want to review it and adopt it at a later meeting. He stated the BOard should also adopt a resolution appointing a responsible authority to administer the requirements for collection, storage, use and dissemination of data for the District. Seuntjens stated that the resolution should identify the Executive Director as the responsible party for the District rather than the name of Executive Director. Babcock asked if the,Tennessen Waming should be on District applications. LeFevere stated that it would only be necessary if the data requested was confidential. Babcock stated staff should, make a change on the background information applications if the policy is adopted because it includes confidential information. Language should be added to the policy that addresses fees for providing information in electronic form within the limits of technology in the office. The consensus of the Board for LeFevere to bdng back a revised copy of the resolution and data practices policy for consideration by the Board 4/23/03 Regular Board Meeting, taking into consideration the discussion at this meeting. B. Additional Business. -1711 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 12, 2003 Page 11 There was no additional business. SAVE THE LAKE A. Discussion of draft 2003 "Save the Lake" Budget. McMillan stated that she had recently finalized the draft 2003 "Save the Lake" Budget. Anticipated revenue from contributions is budgeted at $25,000. Postage and pdnting expenses has decreased for 2003 and is budgeted at $1,500 for postage and $1,000 for printing. A line-item has been budgeted for Water Patrol safety equipment in 2003, noting that this line-item was not present in 2001 or 2002 because funds were dedicated from "Save the Lake" for the Increased Water Patrol Presence Program. The Buoy Lights Program is budgeted at $5,000 in hopes to purchase 22 to 24 new lights and also new brackets to mount the lights. She recommended that Board members contact her with suggestions for placement of the channel buoy lights~ The Three Rivers Park District has requested $3,000 in "Save the Lake" funds to continue the water quality monitoring program in 2003, adding that this has increased from $2,500 in 2002 because of increased laboratory supply costs and seasonal labor salaries. The LMA has requested "Save the Lake" funds to pay for zebra mussel veliger monitoring with a cost of $900 to pay for equipment, supplies, and laboratory analysis. She entertained questions or comments on the draft budget. MOTION: McMillan moved, Suerth seconded to approve the allocation of $3,000 of "Save the Lake" funds for the Three Rivers Park Distdct water quality monitoring program for 2003 and $900 for the LMA zebra mussel monitoring program. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Nybeck stated there were informational items in the packet or handout folders. This included an article in the Lakeshore Weekly News that pertained to the Red Bull Kite Freeze event, a copy of the 2003 Meeting schedule, and a literature from Aquadus Systems on various high-speed transporters they make and a used high-speed transporter they are currently brokering. In the past, the Board has discussed the use of a high-speed transporter with the EWM Harvesting Program. The pdce of the high speed transporter was $15,000 and the price of a new one is well over $100,000. The purchase of the used transporter may be a good way to determine if the utilization of a transporter would improve EWM harvesting efficiency on Lake Uinnetonka, with a minimal investment. He concluded that he would have a further update on this possible purchase at the 3~26~0 Regular Board Meeting. 8. OLD BUSINESS Foster updated the Board on the possibility of the MCWD funding the District harvesting program in the future. He stated that he had recently met' with the Chair and Executive Director the MCWD and he has let them know that the District is interested in requesting funding from the MCWD for potential funding of the District harvesting program. -1712- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 12, 2003 Page 12 Skramstad asked for an update on the appointment of an LMCD representative from the City of Victoria. Foster stated that he had talked to the Mayor and the city is working on appointing a representative, Skramstad asked for a further update on the Upland Farms project. Babcock stated that he and Foster had met with the Mayor and one of the city council members from the City of Uinnetrista, Minnetrista is interested in protecting Six Mile Creek and possibly restricting the use further than the current District ordinance. He noted that he would update the Board if there were further developments with this situation. SkramStad asked about the communications with Howards Point Marina. LeFevere stated the renewal without change application was approved with conditions that no off-lake storage allowed in the lot on the east-side of Howards Point ROad until approved by the BOard of Directors. They have not provided sufficient proof to document boat storage in the lot prior to 1987 and have not submitted a new application. 9. NEW BUSINESS Foster stated that Suerth was very interested in addressing ice safety concerns on Lake Minnetonka and public education, He'recommended that the Board established a sub-committee, with Suerth as Chair, to further investigate into this. The consensus of the Board was that they agreed with the recommendation of Foster, 10. ADJOURNMENT There being' no further business, the meeting was adjoumed at 10,32 p,m, Albert O. Foster, Chairman Lili McMillan, Secretary -1713- DRAFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, March 26, 2003 TOnka Bay City Hall OALLTO ORDEE Foster called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; On/Burma, Mound; Miles Canning, Greenwood; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka. Aisc present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Lili McMillan, Orono; Craig Nelson, Spring Park; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Jose ValdeSuso, Excelsior; Victoria has nO appointed member. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Foster There were no Chair announcements. READING OF MINUTES- 3/12103 LMCD Regular Board Meeting Foster stated that staff had informed him that the minutes from the 3/12/03 Regular Board Meeting Were not finalized in time to be included for review by the Board at this meeting. They will be included in the 4/9103 Regular Board Meeting packet. PUBLIC COMMENTS, Persons in attendance, subjects not on the agenda. There were no comments from persons in attendance on subjeCts not on the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA. Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. Babcock moved, Skramstad seconded to approve the consent' agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Items so approved include IC, 2003 .Multiple Dock Licenses,.staff recommends approval of 2003 renewal, without change~ multiple dock licenses for Minnetonka Power Squadron and North Shore .Madrid; 2A, Minutes from the 2/14/0.3 EWM~XOt cs TaSk Force Meeting; and4A, LMclT,tnsurance, staff recommends Board approval of a motion not to waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. Abdo, Eick, & Meyers, review of draft 2002 LMCD Audit. Nybeck stated that the draft independent audit for the District for 2002 had recently been finalized, working with Treasurer Skramstad Mr. Steve .McDonald from Abdo, Eick, and Meyers coordinated the audit and he was in attendance to provide an overview of it and to address any comments or queStions the Board may have. Foster welcomed McDonald on behalf of the Board. -1714- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 26, 2003 Page 2 McDonald made the following comments: · One of the main focuses of the audit is to give a qualified opinion based on the financial records of the District. In 2001, this opinion was a qualified opinion because the District did not have fixed assets records in place. Records on fixed assets of the District have been addressed in the 2002 audit process, noting that it should be beneficial in the implementation of a new accounting standard by the District in the next few years. · Another focus of the audit is to evaluate intemal controls of the District, especially segregation of duties. The opinion in 2002 is similar to past years in that this is difficult for the District to deal with internally at the staff level because of the limited staff. Outside controls, including an active Board that critically evaluates monthly financiais and budget related questions, is helpful in addressing segregation of duty limitations of the District. Babcock stated that there are different philosophies on the Board on how active it should be on financial matters of the District. He supported the concept that the Board should be actively involved in the review of monthly transactions and budgets of the District. He believed other Board members support relegating this review to Board Officer level or non-Board level. He asked for feedback from McDonald on this. McDonald stated that he believed review by the Board of monthly financial statements is crucial because each Board member has a different perspective of looking at District financial matters. He believed that Board involvement assists in avoiding fraud and miscoding of accounts payable. He continued his comments on the draft 2002 LMCD Audit: The audit looks into compliance by the District with laws, regulations, contracts, and bidding. He reported no instances of non-conformance by the.District in 2002. · The General Fund balance as of 12/31/02 was $t41,070, an increase of $15,386 from the previous year. This represents approximately 45% of expenditures budgeted for 2003, noting that the District has a policy for the General Fund balance of 50% of planned expenditures. The General Fund balance has remained relatively stable as reflected in the graph in the Management Letter. · The Special Revenue Fund balance as of 12/31/02 was $591,263, noting that this includes Save the Lake, New Equipment Acquisition, Eurasian Uilfoil, and Equipment Replacement. The Eurasian Milfoil balance as of 12/31/02 was $74,452, or approximately 60% of planned expenditures. The District has a policy for the Eurasian Milfoil Fund balance of 100%; however, the Board might want.to re-evaluate 'dhahg'i'ng t~nis reserve level, because the District has had a relatively constant cash flow pattern in recent year~. · He reviewed Governmental Accounting Standards (GASB) Statement Number 34 and how it applies to the District. He .Stated that he.believed it would have a greater impact on Cities rather than the District." The majodty of the leg. work for GASB34 hasalready been d0rie"by having fixed assets recor~l~ .in plaCb for the DistriCt. The DiStdctCOuld de~ide to impl~ment.?ASB 34 a year'earty in 2004, additig' that this would require the District to Put together management discussions and th'at he could assist :.~aff with thiS. Skramstad stated that if the District decides to implement GASB 34 in the 2004 budget for the District, this would require budgeting for depreciation of Distdct fixed assets. The 2004 budget process' Will begin in ti~e near future and he believed it might make sense to implement GASB 34 in 2004 to use it as a learning experience. McDonald Stated that cOncluded his overview of the draft audit and he entertained questions or comments from the Board; Foster stated that although the two Funds established for equipment purChaSes appear to be high, New EquiPment Acquisition and Equipment Replacement, he reminded the Board that the District has a new Aquatic Plant Harvester on order for the 2003 season that will reduce the balance of these Funds dramatically. -1715- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 26,:.20(13 page 3 Nybeck stated that there are two projects identified in the audit as designated expenditures for the District. First, there is $8,433 designated for the Water Patrol project in the Save the Lake Fund. This is the balance of the contributions received from the Lake Minnetonka business community two years ago. Second, there is $17,000 designated for future Management Plan projects in the General Fund. The District is budgeting annually for these types of projects at the request of the member cities. Babcock stated that the District has two Funds for the purchase of capital equipment for the harvesting program. First, the New Equipment Acquisition Fund is the balance of unspent funds donated in the late 1980's for the harvesting program. Second, the Equipment Replacement Fund has been established for depreciation purposes. He asked McDonald for his opinion on which of the two Funds the new Aquatic Plant Harvester should be pumhased from. McDonald stated that he would recommend purchasing the New Aquatic Plant Harvester from the New Equipment Acquisition Fund. Skramstad asked if the Board wanted to re-evaluate the District policy for the Eurasian Milfoil Fund. The Board discussed this and the consensus was to hold off on discussing this until the District gets feedback from the MCWD on the possible funding of the Distdct harvesting program in the future. MOTION: Babcock moved, Van Hemke seconded to accept the 2002 LMCD Audit as submitted. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Foster thanked McDonald on behalf of the Board. PUBLIC HEARING · Wayzata Yacht Club (Site 1), new multiple dock license to reconfigure the non-conforming facility under LMCD Code Section 2.015. Foster opened the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. and asked for background from staff. Harper stated that a new multiple dock license application has been submitted for Board consideration to reconfigure the non-conforming facility on Wayzata Bay. It is currently approved for 129 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 540' of continuous shoreline. With a BSU density of approximately 1:4', they are conSider~ a legal, non-conforming facility for density purposes. The applicant has proposed to convert three licensed slide BSU's to one slip BSU at the facility, Code Section 2.015 allows legal, non-conforming facilities to reconfigure Provided a number of requirements are met. These requirements include: 1. The application may not result in an increase in BSU's. 2. The application may not result in an increase in the total square footage of slips associated with BSU's as determined in accordance with subd. 4 of this Section. 3. The application may not result in a lakeward extension of the dock any further beyond 100' from the 929.4 shoreline than the existing dock. 4. The application may not result in any further extension into nomconforming side setback areas than the existing dock. 5. In the case of docks not in conformance with Section 2.01, subd. 2b)2) applicable to new facilities: i) no new BSU's shall be located in the setback area without first securing a vadance pursuant to Section 1.07, -1716- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ' ReguJar Board Meeting March 26, 2003 Page 4 and ii) the application may not result in an increase in slip length opening toward non-conforming side setback areas. Staff has reviewed the proposed application and it complies with these requirements. For the purposes of square footage calculations of converting slides into a slip, Section 2.03 provides for a credit of 100 square feet for each slide converted, subject to all slides being converted being removed. The City of Wayzata has not expressed objections to the proposed application; however, they have commented that the closing of the winter access between the two sites of Wayzata Yacht Club should be approved in advance by the city in the future. Ambrose stated that he did not believe the closing of the winter access between the Wayzata Yacht Cub properties was a sedous issue. However, city staff would like to be made aware of it in future years pdor to the yacht club closing it down because there is deicing occurring at both sites of the yacht club. Harper stated that staff recommends approval of the new multiple dock license for the 2003 season, subject to Wayzata Yacht Club not storing more than 1.9 watercraft on the' corresponding slides. Bacock stated that the proposed site plan appears have two additional slips on the east-end of the facility facing towards shore when compared to the approved site plan. He believed that this should be reconciled by staff to ensure that square footage calculations of the proposed site plan comply with Code Section 2.015. Mr. Steve Bren, Operations Manager for Wayzata Yacht Club, stated that BSU's 106 and 107 were converted from buoys approved some years ago. The proposed survey is an as-built survey that has existed for some years. Babcock stated that he would like to have staff resolve this discrepancy with the applicant. Ambrose asked for clarification on the reasons for the proposed change at Site 1. Bren stated that the proposed change would allow for the storage of a boat that is used in conjunction with the yacht club and its races. Ambrose asked if the yacht club had ant other proposed changes in the future. Nybeck stated that the proposed change being considered by the Board was in response to an inspection he conducted at Site 1 dudng the 2002 season when the boat was being stored in an unauthorized location. Inspectionswere also conducted at Sites 2 and the District Moodng Area Field and concerns were communicated through a detailed inspection letter. Ambrose stated that there appears to be no .correlation between the proposed change and the jib crane proposed by the yacht club that is currently being reviewed by 'the City of Wayzata. Wayzata Yacht Club has submitted an application for a conditional use permit and it has been approved by the Wayzata Planning Commission, with a few conditions that are being addressed by the yacht club. Once these conditions are addressed, it will be forwarded to the Wayzata city council in the near future. He stated that he was encouraged with the recent events and that he would keep the Board informed on this application. There being no further comments, Foster closed the public headng at 7:34 p.m. MOTION: Canning moved, Skramstad seconded to approved the Wayzata Yacht Club (Site 1) new multiple dock license application for the.2003 season, subject to not stodng more than 19 watercraft on the corresponding slides. -1717- Lake MJnnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 26, 2003 Page 5 Babcock recommended a'friendly amendment to the motion that would direct staff to work with the applicant to address the slips on the east-end of the faCility to reconcile that square footage calculations for the proposed site plan are in compliance with Code Section 2.015. Canning and Skramstad agreed to this. VOTE: Ayes (8), Abstained (1, Foster); motion carried. Foster clarified that he abstained from voting because he was on the Wayzata Yacht Club Board, although this would not be legally defined as a conflict of interest. 1. WATER STRUCTURES Foster stated that he would prefer to move agenda item lB before lA because the applicant was in the audience and there waS no one in attendance for Shorewood Yacht Club. There were no objections from the Board on this recommendation. B. Wayzata Marine, consideration of renewal, Without change, multiple dock license application for the 2003 season. Foster asked for' background on this agenda item from staff. Nybeck made the following comments: · Wayzata Marine has submitted a renewal, without change, multiple dock license application for conSideration by the Board for the 2003 season. The facility is currently licensed for 77 Boat Storage Units (BSU~s) on 280' of lakeshore frontage on Maxwell Bay in the CitY of Orono. With a BSU density of approximately 1:4', they are considered a legal, non-conforming facility for density pUrposes. They are also considered a legal non-conforming facility for dock length and side setback requirements. · Prior to the 2000 boating season, the applicant purchased the facility from Lakeside Uadna. Early that year, staff and Board member McMillan were notified that BSU's 3-19 and 36 were having problems maneuvering out to the main part of Maxwell Bay. In 2000, the Board granted a temporary variance from side setback requirements that allowed the applicant to move BSU's 18, 19, and 36 from the southeast end of the facility to the West end. The variance was to expire at the end of the 2000 season, unless it was modified or'extended by order of the Board. · In 2001, the applicant submitted applications to continue the temporary variance granted in 2000. The Board extended the temporary variance an additional two years, noting that it would expire after the 2002 Season. · A renewal, without change, multiple dOck license application for the 2003 season was sent out last fall to the applicant for 74 BSU's rather than 77 taking into consideration the decision of the Board from 2001. The applicant was notified that if they wanted to continue 77 BSU's for 2003 and beyond, it WOuld require a new multiple doCk license application and possibly a vadance application. · To date, the only application received from Wayzata Marine for the 2003 season is for 74 BSU's rather than 77. Staff has discussed this with the applicant and we believe that another application(s) is forthcoming. · TyPically, Staff would recommend approval of the 2003 renewal, without change, multiple dock license for this facility under the consent agenda. However, there are some special circumstances that staff believed' that the Board should be aware of. He recommended approval of the Wayzata Marine 2003 renewal, without change, multiple dock license application with two conditions. First, the approva is or 74 BSU s rather than 77 because BSU s 18~ 19, and 36 expired afterthe 2002 season. Second, to COntinue B~UiS 18, 19, and'36 fOr'the 2003 season, the applicant needs to submit the -1718- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Reguiar Board Meeting March 26, 2003 Page 6 proper application(s) for consideration by the Board. Uhtil an application(s) is received from the applicant and approved by the Board, boat storage should be prohibited at these three BSUs'. He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Skramstad asked the applicant if he was comfortable with the recommendations of staff. Mr. Gary Briggs stated that he was at one time owner of this facility; however, his son Dave currently owns it. They have recently acquired a second facility to be operated for 2003 on Lake Minnetonka and they have not had the opportunity to submit the proper application(s) for consideration by the Board to continue use of these three slips. Foster stated that staff's recommendation has been to approve the renewal, without change, multiple dock license application for 74 BSU's rather than 77. If the Board had a desire to approve the facility for 2003 for 74 rather than 77 at this time, he suggested that a resolution or language in the motion would be appropriate that would not prejudice Wayzata Madne from making application in the future for 77 BSU's. Babcock stated that when an application was considered by the Board for this facility three years ago, the applicant was encouraged to consider where these three BSU's could be located within the "envelope" for this facility. The temporary vadance granted three years ago by the Board is outside of the envelope for this facility. To address the comments raised by Foster, he believed that language could be added that would state the 77 BSU's are approved, subject to them being contained with the existing "envelope" for this facility because he believed that has been the intent of the Board at this facility for the past three years. Foster stated that he would be more comfortable approving 74 BSU,s at this time; however, the applicant could submit a revised site plan for consideration by the Board. for 77 BSU's within their "envelope". He recalled another reason the applicant originally requested the temporary variance was so that they could have a couple of boating seasons to totally reconfigurethe facility in the near future, adding that this would very costly. He questioned whether there is an opportunity to relocate the three BSU's in question without eni~roaching On minimum side setbacks required by Code. Babcock stated that he believed there are options for the applicant to reconfigure within the existing "envelope", noting that the. BOard in past concl~!ded there was not a physical, hardship at this facility caused by LMCD Code. Instead,. this appears to be a financ al hardship and variances from Code should not be granted on financial hardshiPs. Nybeck stated that the primary reason why the application was brought to the Board for consideration was because the application was received on 12/3/02 and stare law requires the Distdct to process it within 120 days. Foster stated' that the applicant COuld agree to sign a waiver of consent from this state law that would allow the apPlicant to WOrk with staff and BabCOck in the submittal of proper applications for consideration by the Board. Briggs stated that he would be agreeable to sign a waiver of consent form in ordbr to work with staff on the submittal of the proper applications for consideration by the Board. He recalled, that there was discussion by the Board in the past that there was a physical hardship of a concave shoreline at this site. LeFevere state that one problem with delaying Board action on the proposed aPpiicat on s that the alternatiVe(~) that the applicant may prop0si~' i'n the future might require time foi: publication purposes and -1719- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District * Regular Board Meeting March 26, 2003 Page 7 consideration by the Board in the meantime, the applicant would be operating a marina facility without a license from the DistriCi because the 2003 boating season is just arOund the comer. He recommended that the Board could approve the license for 77 BSU's, subject to the condition that the applicant cannot use BSU's 18, 19, and 36 until the proper application(s) are submitted and approved by the Board. MOTION: Ambrose moved, Skramstad seconded to approve the 2003 Wayzata Marine renewal, without change, multiple dock licenSe application for 77 BSU's subject to: 1) BSU's 18, 19, and 36 cannot be used until the proper application(s) are submitted and approved by the Board, and 2) subject to the applicant paying the balance for the additional three BSU's. LeFevere stated that the applicant should state orally that he wanted the renewal application to be approved for 77' BSU's rather than 74. Bdggs stated that he wanted the 2003 renewal, without change, application to be approved for 77 BSU's rather than 74. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. A. Shorewood Yacht Club (Sites 1 and 2), consideration of renewal, without change, multiple dock license applications for the 2003 season. FoSter asked fOr background on this agenda item from staff. Nybeck made the following comments: · Shorewood Yacht Club has submitted renewal, without change, multiple dock license applications at Sites 1 and 2 for consideration by the Board for the 2003 season. Site 1 is currently licensed for 82 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 480' of lakeshore frontage on Gideon Bay in the City of Shorewood. With a BSU density of approximately 1:6', they are considered a legal, non-conforming facility for density purposes. This facility is also considered a legal, non-conforming facility for dock length and side setback requirements. Site 2 ~s currently licensed for 35 BSU's on 350' of continuous shoreline, with a BSU density of 1:10'. It is considered a legal, conforming facility because the Board granted it a special density license on 1/24/01. This site was also granted a variance from Code from dock length requirements, With a physical hardship of shallow water. · Staff conducted multiple dock license inspections for both facilities last summer, with three deficiencies recognized. First, the use of BSU's 1 and 2 appeared to become unusable when the new walkway for Site 2 was connected to the west walkway at Site 1. These two BSU's were illegally reqocated to the backside of the walkway and the number Qf boats being stored was increased from two to three. Second, the public amenity at Site 2 that requires the applicant to "Provide free charter boat excursions or fishing trips for at least 100 handicapped or underprivileged per year" was not provided in 2002 based on documentation received from the applicant. Third, an illegal seasonal dock structure was installed as a bddge between the land for Sites 1 and 2. · Staff and Board member Skramstad met with the applicant last fall to discuss these deficiencies and what needed to be done to address them. A summary of these deficiencies was also addressed in a letter to the applicant, dated 11/27/02. · To date, the only applications received for Sites 1 and 2 are renewal, are without change. Staff has discussed this with the attorney for the applicant and staff believes that other applications are forthcoming, Typically, staff wOuld recommend approval of: the 2003 renewal, without change, - 1 720- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Reguiar Board Meeting March 26, 2003 Page 8 applications for these multiple dock facilities under the (~onsent'agenda.. However, there are some special circumstances that staff believed that the Board shOUld be aware of. · The Board could either'appreve or deny the 2003 Shorewood Yacht Club (Site 1 and 2) renewal, withOut change, multiple dock license appl'ications. If the Board decides to approve them for the 2003 season, staff recommended four conditions. First, the balance due for each application should be received by 3/31/03 ($1,462.00 for Site 1 and $405100 for Site 2). Second, discontinuing the illegal storage of watercraft on the backside of the main walkwaY, with the Board establishing a date for removal of the ii'legal permanent dock structUre. Third, discontinuing the illegal dock structure that was used' asa bridge in 2002 between the land for Sites 1 and 2. Fourth, providing and maintaining all public amenities that are outlined in the 1/24/01 Special Density License Order. This should include requiring the applicant to provide free charter boat excursions or fishing trips for at least 200, rather than 100, handicapped or underprivileged in 2003 to compensate for this public amenity not being provided in 2003. Continued failure to provide public amenities outlined in the 1/24/01 Special Density License Order should result in the Board evaluating whether to continue the special density license at Site 2. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Skramstad asked how the District documents whether public amenities are being provided at facilities that have special density licenses. Nybeck stated that staff requests written documentation of public amenities in the inspection report that is sent out after an inspection is conducted. For Shorewood Yacht Club (Site 2), the applicant stated that it was not provided in 2002 and that it was optional. One common form of documentation received from other facilities for charter boat excursions or fishing tdps for the handicapped or underprivileged is photographs. Skramstad questioned whether there is a practical'means to get between Sites 1 and 2 if there is not a bddge betWeen the land at both sites. Babcock stated that the Regionai Trail Corridor is nearby that could be used for access betWeen the two sites. When the' application was approved for Site 2, shorewood Yacht Club made an argument that the 'dock should be connected to Site 1 because the land at Site 2 was natural and pristine. There were lengthy discussionS on the need to maintain access dghts behind the bridge for the site in between Sites 1 and 2. He expressed concem that this facility, and other facilities, are constructing unaUthorized structure in the water before getting approval bY the District. He i:jeii~Ved that this needs to cease and the Board needs to communicate to them that it is not acceptable:' Skmmstad questioned whether the bridge WOuld be considered a dock Structure if it is built between Sites 1 and 2 with~)ut and poles' in the water. BabcoCk stated that he believed it would be in the District jurisdiction because it is over the water outside of the 929.4 contour. Van Hercke stated that She was troubled that the applicant has made changes to both facilities without getting Board approval to do soin advance. MOTION: Babcock moved, Knudsen seconded approval of the ShOrewood Yacht Club (Sites 1 and 2) renewal, WithOut change, multiple dOCk license applications, subject to:l) the balance Offees fOr the applications be i~aid bY 3/3ii03 ($'~,462,0~ for site 1 and $405.00 for Site 2), 2) discontinuing the illegal storage of the watercraft on the backside of the main - 1 721 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting U rch 26, 20B3 walkway, with the removal of any unauthorized dock structures or the bridge by 5/15/03, and 3) the appliaant coming inta aonformance with providing and maintaining all public amenities that are required by the 1/24/01 Spedal Density License Order. Babcock stated that he would be comfodable to make a friendly amendment to the motion if the consensus of the Board was that the applicant should be required in 2003 to provide free charter boat excursions or fishing trips for at least 200, rather than 100, handicapped or underprivileged persons to compensate for this public amenity not being provided in 2002. The consensus of the Board was that the applicant should provide for 200 rather than 100 in 2003. Babcock recommended this as a friendly amendment and Knudsen agreed to this, Burma stated that he agreed with Babcock that there have been a number of instances when the approved and as-built site plans are slightly different, adding that the as-built survey generelly benefits the applicant. He recommended that the Board should consider taking a firmer stance on these types of situations in the future, VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. D. Additional Business, There was no additional business. 2. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE B. 2/14/03 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting Report. Discussion,of Distdct Affidavit Form for Special Events Suerth stated that there was discussion of the affidavit form used by the District for special events on Lake Minnetonka. Mr. Denny Nelson coordinates a number of special events on Lake Minnetonka and he has expressed concern with the affidavit form because he believed that the fishing tournaments pose a Iow dsk of introducing zebra mussels or other exotic species into Lake Minnetonka. Nelson has stated that the Distdct might want to refocus its efforts on education, Foster stated that Nelson believes that the form is too legalistic and that the affidavit for should be simplified into two or three points. He has received an e-mail from Nelson with his suggestions; however, Foster expressed some concem with them. He stated that he would work staff on this project.' Nybeck stated that one condition on permits approved for special events on Lake Minnetonkain 2002 required the tournament coordinators to forward a list of participating watercraft and a copy of a signed affidavit form for each of these watercraft at the conclusion of the event. Not all toumament coordinators in 2002 have provided the District office this documentation and the 2003 special event applications have recently been sent out. In the cover letter for these applications, they were informed that their permit would be denied for 2003 if the documentation has not been submitted to the Distdct office and that this decision could be appealed to the Board. Van Hercke expressed concem whether persons that are participating in special events are telling the truth on the affidavit form. - 1722- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District " Regular Board Meeting March 26, 2003 Page 1'0 Babcock stated that he recalled the Board some years ago would have preferred to have washed all participating watemraft in these events; however, the affidavit form was a compromise by the District after the event coordinators expressed concern with washing all participating watercraft. Suerth stated that Nelson has in general resisted this prOgram by the Distdct to prevent the introduction of' zebra mussels into Lake Minnetonka by the fishing toumaments and other special events. However, Nelson has recommended amending the affidavit form to include educational materials. Canning stated that the affidavit form maybe should be amended to require it be notarized. The Board discussed this in further detail and the consensus of the Board was for Nybeck to work with Foster on updating the affidavit form.. Discussion of 2003 Zebra Mussel Pilot Inspection Pro.qram Suerth stated that there has been enough funds raised to partially cover four public access from the week before Uemodal Day through mid September. The inspection program might have to be cut back slightly at the end of the season if some of the anticipated funds are not received by the LMA. He asked Nybeck for a summary of funds to be used for this program in 2003 Nybeck stated that the District has earmarked $7,000 for this program, $5,000 from the zebra mussel budget and $2,000 from "Save the Lake". The LMA has received a $5,000 donation from the Legacy FoUndation and additional funds from other donors that amount to approximately $2,000. The LMA has stated that they will continue its efforts to raise funds for this project in 2003. Discussion of removal of phosphorous from Lake Minnetonka by the EWM Harvesting Program Wenck Associates has drafted a memorandum that estimates that between 5,000 and 19,000 pound of phosphorous is removed from Lake Uinnetonka annually by the harvesting program. The memorandum states that it would make an impact in a bay on a short-term basis; however, there could be a measurable impact on a long-term basis. One hurdle to be addressed is that the MN DNR permitting program is not intended to allow harvesting for the purpose of removing phoSphOroUs. This might need to be addressed if the MCWD is interested in participating in funding the District harvesting program in the future. Foster updated the Board on his communications with the MC'WD on the possible funding of the harvesting program in the future;. At ~a recent meeting with' the MCWD Chair and the Executive Director, they have expressed interest in possibly funding the harvesting program in the future. In addition to having a mission of water quality, the MCWD is also interested in recreational issues. He attended a recent MCWD Board Meeting to discuss this; however, one'of the cone, emS.exPreSsed was hOw to deal with harvesting of milfoil on a' watershed basis. The MCWD communicated to him that they Would get back to him and how to proceed' with the request. He stated that he would keep the Board informed on the status of this project. Canning asked' how the District harvesting pregram is currently being financed. Babcock stated that funding for the harvesting program is primarily financed by the 14 member cities and funding method is outlined in the state enabling legislation for the District. Canning stated that funding of the District harvesting program might make sense because it cOuld dispersed to the cities within the watershed distdct rather than the 14 member cities. However, he questioned whether there is any danger in the future to delegating these expenses to the MCWD that could result in greater taxes in the future to the local cities by the MCWD. - 1723- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 26, 2003' Page 11 Gm Foster stated that one of the dangers could be that the MCWD might want to take over all of the funding of the District in the future and have the District work under its direction. This has been discussed in the future and he suspected the local cities and Board would oppose that. Babcock stated to discontinue the District, it would require either the request of three-fourths of the 14 member cities or the state legislature to do so. Funding of the District budgets is outlined in the state enabling legislation and it includes the harvesting program. If the MCWD decides to either fully or partially fund the harvesting program in the future, it might allow the District to fund other priorities that have not been funded by.the District in the past. He believed that the funding of the harvesting program by the MCWD would provide the District greater flexibility. He did not believe that the MCVVD taking over for the District was realistic because the 14 member cities have stated that they want local control of Lake Minnetonka, adding that this is documented in the Management Plan. Skramstad questioned how the MCWD would deal with harvesting requests on other lakes in the watershed district, such as Christmas Lake, if funding of the District harvesting program is dispersed to all cities within the watershed district. LeFevere stated that the MCWD would not be able to take over the District, including the harvesting program, because its powers are limited by the State. For example, it levying authority for capital projects needs to be done on a project by project basis annually and the tax is levied through Hennepin County. Similar to the District, the powers and authorities of the MCWD are defined by state enabling legislation, adding that most or their powers and authorities focus on water quality. Staff update on the. possible purchase of high speed transport equipment for the 2003 EWM Harvesting Program. Foster asked for an update on this agenda item from staff. Nybeck stated that he updated the Board at the last meeting on his recent visit to Aquarius Systems to check on the new harvester on order for the 2003 season. Dudng this visit, Aquarius Systems showed him a used high speed transporter that might benefit the 2003 EWM Harvesting Program for $15,000. Minnesota Statutes establishes a Uniform Municipal Contraet Law for the DJstdct relating to the possible purchase, noting that it requires the District to obtain two or more quotations. Five quotations have been received and the only high speed transporter available at this.time was from Aquarius Systems... There are a series of questions that have been forwarded to Aquarius Systems; however, the District does not feedback on all of them.~ Feedback on. these questions and recommendation will be made at the 4~9~03 Regular Board Meeting. D. Additional Business. Burma stated that he believed one of the biggest threat to introducing zebra mussels into Lake Minnetonka are residents who live on the lake that go to infested waters and store their boats in the water for a prolonged period of time and return to Lake Uinnetonka with their boats. He believed it is key to educate these residents that it is essential .to have their boats inspected and/or cleaned before launching it into Lake Minnetonka. The. Board discussed th s and the consensus was to,include educational materials in the local newspapers and newsletters of the 14 member cities and the LMA. The Board directed staff to forward a short paragraph to the 14 member cities addressing this and to report back to the Board. - 1724- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 26, 2003= 3. FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers (3/16/03 - 3/31/03). page t2: Skramstad reviewed the audit of vouchers as submitted. MOTION: Skramstad moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted. VOTE: Motion carded unanimously. B. Additional Business. Skramstad asked the Board if they would like to further discuss Board involVement in the revieW of the financial matters for the District. The Board discussed this and there was no consensus of the Board to make changes on review of Distr ct financial matters. Knudsen left at 9:07 p.m. ADMINISTRATION B, Consideration Of draft LMCD ReSOlution 104. Nybeck stated that the draft resolution was on the agenda that proclaimed recognition of ValUed service for Janet L. Briner, a long-time employee, The Board has previously discussed recognizing her at the 2004 "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet Dinner and awarding her this resolution, and pOssiblyeither a plaque. Anything over the plaque would be considered a gift would require voluntary contributions from Board members. The Board discussed the draft resolution and whether it was too legalistic. The consensus of the Board was to modify the draft resolution to allow for signature of all Board members on it and bring it back for review by the Board at the 4/9/03 Regular Board Meeting. C. Discussion of draft Executive Director Position DesCriPtion. Foster asked for an ~Jpdate on this agenda'item from SkramStad. SkramStad stated that at the last performance review for NybeCk, there was'discussion on the need to establish a position description to provide Nybeck meaningful feedback on his performance review. The draft position description is a first draft, noting that it includes five or six position responsibilities and necessary knowledge, skills, and abilities. He entertained feedback or comments on the draft position description. BabCOck stated that:he believed there was a difference between a positiOn desCriptiOn and a liSt of detailed liSts of goals and objectives on an annual basiS. Van Hercke stated that she also liked a detailed list of goals and responsibilities for the Executive Director. Nybeck stated that it might make sense to have an adoPted poSition description that is more vague, with a moro detailed hst of goals and object,yes for the upcoming review penod that are changed annually. - 1725- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 26, 2003 Page 13 The consensus of the Board Was to have Skramstad and Nelson to further investigate into this and bring it back to the Board with recommendations. D. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 5. LAKE USE & RECREATION Then was no discussion. 6. SAVE THELAKE Then was no discussion. 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Nybeck stated that thne informational items wen included in the handout folders. This included a monthly summary of District staff activities, a brochure that summarizes a Boat and Water Safety Seminary being coordinated by the Sheriff's Water Patrol on 4/9/03, and an update on the City of Shonwood pending criminal complaint with the Shorewood Yacht Club. 8. OLD BUSINESS Update on Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee Foster stated that the first sub-committee meeting has been held and then was significant discussion at that meeting. Then was discussion at the 3/12/03 Regular Board Meeting on a moratorium on new special density license applications to allow the sub-committee to finish its work; however, no moratorium was established. A Meeting Report for the first sub-committee is being finalized and a second sub-committee will be scheduled in the near futun. Victoria Repnsentative Foster stated that he had recently discussed with the Victoda Mayor ngarding the City of Victoria appointing a Board member to the District. He nported that the City of Victoria has advertised for the Board position; however, they nceived no feedback from the public. The City of Victoria has ncently sent out a letter to all nsidents on the lake on whether they an intensted in serving on the Board. Victoda has ncently nceived interest from a member of the public that used to live on the lake; however, currently does not and is not a nsident of Victoria. Foster informed that the Board member does not need to either live on the lake or be a resident of Victoria. He stated that he would keep the Board informed on this. Six Mile Creek Skramstad asked if then had been any updates on Six Mile Creek with the City of Minnetrista. Babcock stated that there are no changes and that he was waiting for feedback from the City of Minnetrista. NEW BUSINESS Suerth updated the Board on a local towing company that had ncently pulled a truck from the lake near the site when the two teenagers died this past winter. He believed that the Sheriff's Water Patrol directed the towing -1726- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 26, 2003 Page 14 company to bring the car up to the ice and it was recognized at that time that the vehicle had been stolen. The towing company has since been lefl~ with an unpaid towing bill that has not been paid because the vehicle was stolen. Nybeck stated that he believed the towing company was instructed that the Sheriff's Water Patrol would pay to have the truck removed from the lake before the towing company pulled it up from the bottom of the lake. He believed that the towing company then pulled it up from the bottom of the lake, withoUt direction from a governmental body with jurisdiction that could have directed the towing company to pull it up, The owner of the vehicle has decided not to pay for the tow because the vehicle was reported stolen and there is an exception in the state law. The Board discussed this issue and whether it would be appropriate to consider using "Save the Lake" funds to assist the towing company in the non-payment of the bill. There was no consensus of the BOard on it. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Albert O. Foster, Chairman Lili McMillan, Secretary - 1727- Mound Public Safety Facility Meeting 4:00 p.m. Monday, April 7, 2003 Agenda 2. 3. 4. o Excavation schedule update and issues Construction trailer placement and starmp Financial, invoicing and request for payment processing Site Plan issues: · Neighbors land purchase status · Property site trees and layout · Parking, parking, parking · Phone line issues (telephone pedestal) · City Hall parking lot access Up and coming projects · Furniture purchase · Phone system evaluation and decision · Technology systems specifications and quotes · Kitchen dishwasher donation ($9000 free) Miscellaneous · Next meeting -1728- CITY OF MOUND Meeting Minutes Mound Public Safety Facility Meeting held on 4/07/03 Date printed 04/15/03 The meeting was convened at 4 PM Monday, April 7, 2003 at Mound Fire Station: Present: Kandis Hanson City KH Miles Britz SEH Greg Pederson City GP Don Geiger Amcon MB DG Excavation - The CR92 dumpsite is still to wet to start hauling. We will have to spread the soils at this site in order to get the approximately 8000 CY of soils on site. This will decrease the potential savings from $1.50/CY to $1.00/CY. DG to send letter to Veit instructing them that if there is even the remotest of concerns on an area of the dump site being a wetlands they are to verify with the DNR. The city has stated they do not require any black dirt for their ballparks. 2. The trailer has been placed on the school parking lot across Wilshire Blvd, Furniture has been delivered from the City. DG is working on hooking up phone and electrical. 3. GP signed and forwarded the pay application. The neighbors to the south of the site have agreed in principle to sell the triangular section of property towards the back of the site. They do not wish to swap to obtain the front triangular section of property on Wilshire Blvd. There is no set back for parking their RV next to the property line. They will present a motion at the Council meeting on Tuesday to purchase the property. MB will start design work on the additional property. The need to maintain some trees was discussed. The offer states there are 7 trees, which the City will have to pay the neighbor $3,000 per tree. GP reviewed the site and there are actually 8 trees. It was determined that we should try to save as many trees as possible. MB indicated that we may not be able to save as many trees as we wish because the root systems would be cut and though we may save the tree they could die in a couple of years. The City may have to replant some trees in this area. The land will have to be replated and we will require a construction easement to start work on this area once a purchase agreement is signed. 6. GP concerns about emergency response parking was discussed. MB to review during design of additional property. 7. Discussed the requirement to relocate a telephone pedestal. Will have to coordinate any service interruptions with the Police Department. Will try to do the move on a Saturday. The access to the back parking lot will have to be closed for about three (3) weeks during construction of the new entry road to the Safety Facility and the back parking lot of City Hall. The City will have to use the door on Maywood for access into the building. Police will have to move excess vehicles. DG to vedfy if Safety Facility pad can be done first. DG to formulate a schedule with contingency built in. 9. GP to review furniture layout with the police officers tonight after this meeting. 10. GP is currently working on the new phone system for the Safety Facility. 11. The City has been offered a free dishwasher for the kitchen from a private citizen. GP will forward the specifications on to MB. C:\WINDOWS\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5\K52JC9UFWIPS 04 07 03.doc - 1729- Page CITY OF MOUHD 12. MB to review the apparatus bay shower. 16. Next meeting April 21 at 4:00. 17. Meeting adjourned at 5:30 PM. Minutes by DG. Call if any missing items or discrepancy. Meeting held on 4/07/03 Date printed 04/15/03 C:\WINDOWS\Local SettingS\Temporary Internet Files\Content. lE5\K52JC9UF\MPS 04 07 03.doc - 1730- Page 2 of 2 Date 4/1/2003 4/2/2003 4/3/2003 4/4/2003 4/5/2003 4/6/2003 4/7/2003 4/8/2003 4/9/2003 4/10/2003 4/11/2003 4/12/2003 4/13/2003 4/14/2003 4/15/2003 4/16/2003 4/17/2003 4/18/2003 4/19/2003 4/20/2003 4/21/2003 4/22/2003 4/23/2003 4/24/2003 4/25/2003 4/26/2003 4/27/2003 4/28/2003 4/29/2003 4/30/2003 Totals Harbor Wine & Spirits Monthly Comparison 2003 2002 4365.43 3775.61 4375.44 9086.5 10528.93 3528.28 3492.48 4023.33 5203.48 10540.27 13456.76 4997.35 3884.48 3412.91 3392.98 3171.42 3278.12 4253.72 6625.55 8546.5 3313.17 3682.56 3681.27 3808.67 8713.29 9917.55 4455.62 3697.73 4441.11 4408.93 8143.64 9027.38 2844.3 4098.87 3420.66 3989.12 7963.32 8789.62 3356.06 4288.15 84671.25 135309.3 Difference +/- 972.45 604.19 1097.32 4832.78 3903.38 -8546.5 3528.28 179.31 340.77 1522.21 6731.6 4743.47 -9917.55 4997.35 -571.14 -284.82 -4441:11 -4408.93 -8143.64 -9027.38 0 -2844.3 -4098.87 -3420.66 -3989.12 -7963.32 -8789.62 0 -3356.06 -4288.15 ~50638.06 -1731 - Harbor Wine & Sprits Monthly Comparision Date 2003 2002 Difference +/- 3/1/2003 9211.83 7592,37 1619.46 3/2/2003 8671.22 -8671.22 3/3/2003 3350.47 3350.47 3/4/2003 3253.04 3251.93 1.11 3/5/2003 3715.46 3350.14 365.32 3/6/2003 3246.12 3438,22 -192.1 3/7/2003 7811.13 4128.51 3682.62 3/8/2003 8367.7 7187.23 1180.47 3/9/2003 8696.44 -8696.44 3/10/2003 3382.76 3382.76 3/11/2003 2928.66 2961.94 -33.28 3/12/2003 3007.44 3266~49 -259.05 3/13/2003 4179.82 3166.15 1013.67 3/14/2003 7579.32 5136.84 2442.48 3/15/2003 11331,49 7146.92 4184.57 3/16/2003 8362.6 -8362.6 3/17/2003 4238.79 4238,79 3/18/2003 3420.95 3314.02 106.93 3/19/2003 3965.11 3339.21 625.9 3/20/2003 3550.87 3355.17 195.7 3/21/2003 8090.91 3894.9 4196.01 3/22/2003 10633.53 6994.82 3638.71 3/23/2003 9094.51 -9094.51 3/24/2003 3049.31 3049.31 3/25/2003 3554.44 3401.83 152.61 3/26/2003 4621.76 3128.58 1493.18 3/27/2003 4655.42 3416.35 1239.07 3/28/2003 8428.7 4347.48 4081,22 3/29/2003 12870.11 7895.33 4974,78 3/30/2003 11578,55 -11578,55 3/31/2003 3225.79 3225.79 Totals 145670.93 140117.8 5553.18 - 1732- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com MEMO Date: April 16, 2003 TO: Robert Pieper Renee Dahl FROM: Kandis Hanso~ City Manager / ' RE: Lake Minnetonka Sun Fest At a recent Department Head meeting, the concept of having a Blues Fest in Mound Bay Park was discussed. A "brainstorming" session took place where department heads' enumerated the some concerns and costs. It was noted that a Blues Fest is a great concept and staff supports the idea. However, the City doesn't have ~,ny available funds to help with the event, so proceeds would have to be dedicated to cover the costs associated with the event. The extensiveness of the event would require that it be handled by a promoter, who would be the responsible and answerable party. It was first determined that there are only two unscheduled days left at the Depot at Mound Bay Park. They are July 5th and August 30th. We cannot hold a major event at the park without first reserving the DePot for event itself. We need to assure that we do not create an offensive situation or take away parking for someone already scheduled to rent it. The possibility of working cooperatively with Minnetrista and using the Westonka Recreational Park as the location, was mentioned. Other considerations offered by Department Heads were as follows: Permits required- Temporary 3.2 beer permit(S50) Public gathering permit ($300) Transient merchant permits ($30 each) for possible vendors Live music permit ($100) Sign (banner) permit Insurance coverage, with proof of insurance. ' printed on recycled paper - 1733- Page 2 Need for fenced off "beer garden", wrist bands for of-age persons, and attendant at gate and within the area to prevent under-age consumption. Control of carried on liquor in the park, which is not allowed ' ' Portable restrooms, including handicapped accessible, totaling six (6): $600. Police overtime & equipment for the day:(estimated $1,860) *Note - Any arrests resulting from lest would be additional cost tO the Police Department of about $650/arrest. Additional Water Patrol- cost? Traffic management performed by police reserves Reserves to man crosswalks (3/crosswalk) Shuttle buses from various locations; i.e., downtown, church & school parking lots, etc., and security for the lots used. Band shell for band -$1200 Electrical power for the bands - $$ More people and kids in the water could require use of the school's lifeguards Additional garbage receptacles and cleanup, by Parks staff Deposits required for repair to park grounds Closing the boat launch for the day to provide for use of that parking lot Standby EMT should be on site Parking monitored so as to not restrict access of emergency response vehicles These are some of the concerns that came from our session. I am happy to meet with you and discuss this in more detail. In order to proceed, I would need a written response as to how you'll address these issues. Please contact me if I can be of any help - 472-0609. 2 - 1734- LAKE MINNETONKA SON FEST An outdoor event in the city of Mound that is a fundraiser for Our Lady of the Lake Robert Pieper/Renee Dahl 3995 Northshore Drive Orono,MN 55364 952-471-7511 Fax 952-471-6345 e-mail RENEEDAHL5~AOL.COM - 1735- Robert Pieper 3995 NORTH SHORE DRIVE ORONO, kin 55364 Phone 952-471-7511 Cell 612-600-7510 Fax 952471-6345 April 11, 2003 City of Mound 534 ! Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear City of Mound, PROPOSAL Because of our past experience of organizing and successfully having an event formally known as the "Big Island Blues Fest", we are interested in working with the City of Mound and Our Lady of the Lake School to organize a similar event. The ideas for the new event include: I. New event to be called Lake Minnetonka Sun Fest. 2. Event to include 2 or 3 bands held on the Mound Beach. (One of which to be a popular local band.) 3. Proposed date and hours of event are June 28th fi:om noon to 7:00 p.m. 4. Boats anchored in bay. 5. Local businesses setting up booths. 6. Proceeds going to Our Lady of the Lake School. In planning the event, the City of Mound may want to consider the following: - Security - Impact on area residents; - Parking and traffic consideration; - Access for police, fire, and medical services for event and for local residents; -Toilet facilities; -Trash and recyclable materials; - Other considerations created by specific needs of the event. Thanks for your consideration. Sincerely, Robert Pieper - 1736- April 14, 2003 TO: Gino Kandis Hanson FROM: Joyce Nelson Kecycling Coordinator Subject: Clean-up DaY Duties /'7 This year will be our 12th annual Recycling/Clean-up Day. Our hours for collecting material are 8:00 - 3:00. We start at 7:00 a.m. setting up for business, getting brochures ready, getting change ready, telling the vendors where to park, some vendors come the night before, other that morning. The guys are bringing out the loader, skidsteer, truck for flUorescent tubes, building ramps for the furniture, mattress and misc. junk bins. People start arriving around 7:30 a.m., so by 8:00 we have a mad rush. Some years the line just doesn't seem to end. We have 4 people collecting money (me, Jodi, Collectte and Joanie from Minnetrista) Greg acts as the bouncer. We have 3 guys working the furniture bins, 2 in the electronic bins, 1 in Vietnam vets truck, 1 with the tires, 1 to handle phone books and fluorescent tubes and hand out new recycling bins. As of this year all the furniture, mattress and misc. junk bins have to be hauled to a landfill. In the past the stuff wa,~ hauled down to the HERC center to be burned. I don't know what that's going to do to our pricing. The City of Minnetrista supplies the Police Reserves for directing traffic. We estimate about 1,000 cars coming thru in the 7 hours. When we close we have to load everything up, cover the bins in case of rain and haul the tubes, phone books, recycling bins back to Mound to be unloaded there. We usually firdsh at about 4:00 p..m. We pray for good weather. - 1737- Page 1 of 3 Kandis M Hanson From: To: Sent: Subject: "Leah Weycker" <weyckerl@westonka.k12.rnn.us> "Leah Weycker" <weyckerl@westonka.k12.mn.us> Wednesday, April 16, 2003 5:00 PM WHCC Agenda 4/23103 **Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative** Agenda -April 23, 2003 12:00- 1:30 PM Gillespie Center 2590 Commerce Blvd. Mound Any comments or questions, contact Leah Weycker, Collaborative Coordinator, at 952-491-8058 or WeyckerL~westonka.kl 2.mn.us WORK GROUP PARTICIPANTS SHOULD BE AT THIS MEETING TO PRESENT THEIR BUDGET REQUESTS. 1. Lunch 12:00 Feel free to bring your own bag lunch or join us for a light "free will donation" lunch, suggested value $6.00. 2. Introductions 3. Additions or Changes to the Agenda / Minutes 4. Announcements 5. Budget Review Representatives of the work groups will present their budgets for approval. This is an important meeting for everyone since it directs much of our funding for the coming fiscal year. "To improve is to change; To be perfect is to change often.." --Winston Churchill **Advisory Group Updates** Health Sandy Olstad, Laurie Fitz, Mary Goode, Jeanette Metz, Mark Brekke, Carol Miletti, Kevin Erickson The health group met to discuss their budget. Youth Activities Sandy Rauschendorfer-temp chair, Jean Ann Thayer, Kathy Jones, Kim - 1738- 4/17/03 Page 2 of 3 Erickson Heiar The youth group met to discuss their budget. Parent Education Sandy Wing, Sandy Olstad, Bill Erickson, Amy Taggart Westonka. org magnets are in and will be distributed along with a letter promoting the site and asking community members to check their information. Help us promote this great family asset. Korwin Kroenberg will be the parent speaker next October. The parent group along with parent advisory groups in the schools will parmer with this event. Community no update Margaret Holste, Cathy Bailey, Ginny Lazno Communications no update Anne Wilbur, Carol Olson Executive no update Craig Anderson, Carol Olson, Margaret Holste, Sandy Wing, Sandy Raushendorfer, Mary Hughes Alliance for Families and Children in Hennepin County The Allies for Change grants can be renewed this fall. Consider new projects that will improve kids stability and mobilize parents. Ask Leah for the grant details. **Minutes** Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative March 28, 2003 12:00 - 1:30 pm Attending: Craig Anderson, Bill Erickson, Mary Hughes, Kathy Jones, Patsy Kiesow, Ginny Lazano, Laura Lundberg, Peter Meyer, Carol Olson, Scott Palmer, Sandy Rauschendorfer, JeanAnn Thayer, Leah Weycker, guests- Bob Ballentine and Sharon Thayler. Minutes and agenda: Kathy Jones made a motion to approve the minutes and agenda with no changes, JeanAnn seconded seconded. Motion passed. Announcements: LCTS- Local Collaborative Time Study We covered how LCTS funding works (our main funding source) and if we were effected by the state budget cuts. The funds are generated through a time study conducted with school staff that works 5 0% of their time with children that could be considered "at risk" of out of home placement if preventative measures are not taken. The school staff calls in a code A-K depending on what they are doing at the time of the random moment. The state translates the codes into dollars. The actual formula is not known but it is clear that some of - 1739- 4/17/03 Page 3 of 3 the codes do not generate dollars. Beside the codes, the staff salary is a big factor in the amount generated. Because these are reimbursement dollars, we submit a cost report that covers salary and benefits for each participant of the time study. The funds generated are federal funds from foster care (4E) and Medicare. The current state budget cuts eliminated collaborative start up funds, which we had already received. In this climate, all tax based funding is in jeopardy but we have not been told of any other certain cuts to Collaboratives. Leah has been working with the school district to be sure we are generating the maximum dollar amount allowed. It is very important that the staff are selecting the correct codes. Westonka Area Sports Complex Bob Ballentine, fundrasier and Sharon Thayler, treasure, presented a plan of the Westonka Area Sports Complex. They are in the capital campaign stages of a sports complex that could house hockey, soccer, basketball, wrestling, football, softball and baseball. They are looking for us to: join in the leadership, become volunteers, do a three year financial pledge, co-plan future events. Summer school The youth group discussed a funding request for summer school which has been cut from the state budget. There was money in this current budget that was not spent. They would like to redirect the funds to help a scaled sown version of smnmer school. The summer program would be available to kids who are failing classes. In the past, summer school included F students, D students and some at risk students. It was determined that no vote was necessary but the information is appreciated. Budget The group broke out into work groups to do budget requests. All the budget requests will be discussed at the next WHCC meeting in April. - 1 740- 4/17/03 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK - 1741 -