1992-03-11 ITY F M ATEMENT: The City of Mound, through
teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality
services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a
safe, attractive and flourishing community.
AGENDA
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M. WED~.SDAY, MARCH 11, 1992
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Se
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 25, 1992, REGULAR
MEETING. PG. 576-579
PRESENTATION OF 1992-1993 COMMERCIAL INSURANCE
PROGRAM - EARL BAILEY, R. L. YOUNGDAHL &
ASSOCIATES. PG. 580-590
1991 DEPARTMENT HEAD ANNUAL REPORTS
- JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER
- LEN HARRELL, POLICE CHIEF
- JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR
PG. 591-593
PG. 594-662
PG. 663-677
RESOLUTION TO GRANT AN EXTENSION OF RESOLUTION
#91-72 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4967 WILSHIRE
BLVD. FOR THOMAS NICHOLS. PG. 678-689
CASE ~91-057:
RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR DENNIS
ZYLLA, (REPRESENTING JAMES
& JOSEPHINE SHARP) 4925 GLEN
ELYN ROAD, LOT 22, BLOCK 24,
SHADYWOOD POINT, PID #13-117-
24 11 0097. PG. 690-693
SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR PROPOSED RENTAL HOUSING
ORDINANCE.
(SUGGESTED DATE~ APRIL 28, 1992)
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT.
BID AWARD: 1992 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT (MATERIAL WILL BE DISTRIBUTED
WEDNESDAY EVENING).
10.
11.
12.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR & CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE A WARRANTY DEED TO SELL CITY PROPERTY.
(THIS IS FOR THE CLOSING ON THE TURNQUIST SALE). PG. 694-697
PAYMENT OF BILLS.
PG. 698-714
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
Department Head Monthly Reports for
February, 1992.
PG. 715-745
Be
LMCD Representative's Monthly Report
for February, 1992. (To be handed out)
C. LMCD Mailings.
PG. 746
De
Planning Commission Minutes of February 24,
1992. Pg. 747-751
Eo
Final & Official Copy of the LMCD Long-Term
Management Plan as adopted in December,
1991.
Fe
Thank you letter from David Feerhusen,
Re/Max, re: meeting on City's dock
system.
Pg. 752
REMINDER: COW Meeting, March 17, 1992, will
consist of a meeting with the EDC on Mound
Visions Project. Begins at 7:00 P.M. at
City Hall.
25
February 25, 1992
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 25, 1992
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, February 25, 1992, in the Council
Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Skip Johnson, Councilmembers Andrea
Ahrens, Liz Jensen, and Ken Smith. Councilmember Jessen was absent
and excused. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle,
Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, city Attorney Jim Larson, Building
official Jon Sutherland, Fire chief Don Bryce and the following
interested citizens: Jeff Sparks and Fred Gustin.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
1.0 MINUTE___ S
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Smith to approve the
Minutes of the February 11, 1992, Regular Meeting and the
February 18, 1992, Committee of the Whole Minutes, as
submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
1.1 PROCLAMATION - 1992 GIRL SCOUT ~EEK, 3/8/92-3/14/9~
The Mayor read the proposed proclamation.
Jensen moved and smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %92-21
RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MARCH 8-14, 1992,
AS GIRL SCOUT WEEK IN THE CITY OF MOUND
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.2 CASE ~92-002: DEAN & ELLEN L~ FOREST, 4920 WILSHIRE BLVD.,
METES & BOUNDS DESCRIPTION, BLOCK
WYCHWOODt PID ~24-117-24 14 0050t VARIANCE TO.
REBUILD HOUSE ON EXISTING NONCONFORMIN~
FOUNDATION
The Building official explained the request.
Commission recommended approval.
The Planning
Smith moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
26
Febrq/ary 25, 1992
RESOLUTION #92-22
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT YARD
BETBACK VARIANCE TO RECONSTRUCT A HOUSE
ON AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING FOUNDATION
AT 4920 NILSHIREBLVD., NYCHWOOD & 8ETON,
METE8 &BOUND8 DESCRIPTION, BLOCK 39, PID
#24-117-24 14 0050, p & ~ CASE #92-002
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.3 1991 DEPARTMENT HEAD ANNUAL REPORTS
The following .Departmen~ Heads presented '
the City Council: Buildln Of ' ' __their a~nua~ reports to
g f~c~al Jon Sutherlana; Fire Chief Don
Bryce; and City Clerk Fran Clark.
1.4 ~N FROM PARKS & OPEN SPACE
ON COMMISSiO~ COMMISSION RE: VACANCY
The City Manager explained that four persons applied for the
vacancy. Two were interviewed in December. The vacancy was then
advertised again and another two persons applied. The other two
applicants were interviewed in February. Three of the Park
Commissioners were not present at one or both of the interviews.
The Park Commission decided that those Commissioners should not
vote. There was a tie vote and a re-vote was taken. The Park
Commission recommended Ralph Bauer be appointed.
~eC°~1 ~~:~ ~n~eC°~~ti~ and the process used to
a
recommendation made b" the ..... onclusion was that the
~ ~r~ commission was not a strong
recommendation. They also thought the 2 original candidates should
have been invited back to refresh the Commissioner,s memories at
the interview in February. Interviewing all four simultaneously in
February would also have allowed all 8 Commissioner,s to vote on
the recommendation.
The Council asked that the process used to fill vacancies on the
various Commissions be discussed at the Committee of the Whole
Meeting in April. At that time they will consider a uniform
process for all Commissions to use.
There was discussion on the qualifications and backgrounds of the
candidates that applied. The Council also discussed the fact that
since this is an advisory commission to the Council perhaps the
Council should have more input into the selection process. This
will all be discussed at the COW Meeting in April.
Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
27
February 25, 1992
RBBOLUTIOM ~92-23
RESOLUTION TO ~PPOINT MO MUELLER TO THE
PII~RK & OPEN BP~CE COI~iIBBION FOR A THREE
YEAR TER~ - EXPIRING 12-~1-94
The vote was 3 in favor with Ahrens voting no. Motion carried.
1.5
RECO1Q4END~TION FROM P~ & OPeN 8P~CECOI~IBSIONRE: 8UMI4ER
PARKS PROGI~31 ~ 8UIQ~R BEACH PROG1M~
The City Manager explained that the two programs proposed are
within the budgeted amounts.
MOTION made by Bmith, seconded by Jensen to approve the
~greements for the Bummer Parks Program and the 8-mmer Beach
Program as proposed by Westonka Community Bervices and
recommended by the Parks & Open Space Commission. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT.
There were none.
1.6 SET PUBLIC WR~RING FOR YEAR XVIII COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT (CDBG) PROGI~%M
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Smith to set Tuesday, March
24, 1992, at 7:30 P.M. for a public hearing to consider the
Year XVIII Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.7 ENCROACHMENT ON CITY PROPERTY
The City Clerk explained that property located at 3068 Brighton
Blvd. has an encroachment onto City land. It has been this way
since at least 1971. In 1987 the person owning the property came
and asked to purchase a portion of the property so the encroachment
would be removed. The Council adopted Resolution #87-73 agreeing
to sell part of the parcel for $400. The person never finalized
the sale. Now the property is in foreclosure and the Veterans
Administration is asking to purchase the parcel in order to clear
the encroachment. Staff recommends authorizing the Mayor and City
Manager to execute a Quite Claim Deed to sell the property to the
Veterans Administration for $400.
Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %92-24
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYORANDCITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO
SELL CITY PROPERTY (PART OF LOT 16v BLOCK
14s ARDEN
28
February 25, 1992
The vote was unanimously in favor.
1.8 ~&YMENT OF BILLS
Motion carried.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Smith to authorize the
payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of
$64,593.54, when funds are available. A roll call vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
INFORMATION/MISCEn?~_m~NEOU~
Planning Commission Minutes of February 10, 1992.
Park & Open Space Commission Minutes of February 13, 1992.
LMCD Mailings.
De
Ge
Letter from Governor Arnie Carlson Re: Suggestions on Solving
the State's Budget Crisis.
League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Conference is scheduled
for Tuesday, March 24, 1992, in St. Paul. Please let Fran
know if you are interested in attending.
Meeting with Realtors and other interested parties concerning
Commons Docks is scheduled for Thursday, February 27, 1992
10:00 A.M.-Noon at City Hall. '
REMINDER: COW Meeting, March 17, 1992, will consist of a
meeting with the EDC on Mound Visions Project. Begins at 7:00
P.M. at City Hall.
He
REMINDER: City Council Meeting of March 10, 1992 has been
rescheduled to March 11, 1992, at 7:30 P.M. Councilmember
Ahrens stated she would be late at the rescheduled meeting
because of a previous commitment.
1.9 ZUCKMAN CASR
The City Attorney reviewed the Melvin Zuckman case which went to
court last summer and the judge has now made her findings and
decision on the case. Mr. Zuckman has been given until June 1,
1992, to remove the boathouse structure. He was also given 90 days
to remove all occupants from the middle level dwelling unit on his
property.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Smith to adjourn at 9:10
P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Attest:
City Clerk
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
R.L. ¥OUNGDAI'iL & ASSOCIATES
10261 Yellow Circle I~rive
Minnctonka, Minnesota 55343
(612) 933-7488
FAX (612) 933-0916
CITY OF MOUND
SUMMARY OF 1992 INSURANCE COVERAGES
FEBRUARY, 1992
PRESENTED BY: EARL E. BAILEY
R. L. YOUNGDAHL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
THIS IS A SUMMARY OF YOUR INSURANCE COVERAGES PREPARED FOR YOUR
CONVENIENCE. NOTHING IN THIS SUMMARY SHALL SUPERCEDE THE POLICY
LIMITS, COVERAGES, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS.
COVERAGES
PROPERTY
A. Buildings & Contents - Blanket
1. Perils Insured Against
a. Ail Risk, Subject to Company Forms
b. Replacement Cost
c. Betterments & Improvements
d. 90X Coinsurance
e. Agreed Amount Endorsement
f. $ 2,500 Deductible, Per Occurrence
B. Contents at 2324 Wilshire Boulevard
1. Perils Insured Against
a. Ail Risk, Subject to Company Forms
b. ACV
c. 100% Coinsurance
d. $ 2,500 Deductible, Per Occurrence
4,516,890
180,000
II. BUSINESS INTERRUPTION
Loss of Earnings
1. At Location 2324 Wilshire Boulevard
2. 25% Monthly Limitation
3. All Risk, Subject to Company Forms
4. No Deductible
$ 80,000
III.
CRIME COVERAGE
Employee Dishonesty
1. City Clerk
2. Finance Director
3. Other Employees
Theft, Disappearance & Destruction
1. Inside
2. Outside
3. After Business Hours
C. Forgery or Alteration
D. $250 Deductible
$
$
20,000
20,000
100,000
3,000
10,000
2,000
20,000
COVERAGES Cont'd
IV.
GENERAL LIABILITY
A. Limits of Liability
1. Bodily Injury & Property Damage
2. $1,000 Deductible Applies to All
Property Damage Claims
B. Premises Hedical Payment
1. Each Person
C. Manufacturers/Contractors
1. Additional Insured/Burlington
Northern
D. Premises/Operations
E. Contractual Liability Coverage - Blanket
F. Personal and Advertising Injury Limit
G. Host Liquor Liability
H. Fire & Explosion Legal Liability
Coverage - Real Property
I. Products & Completed Operations
J. Liability Broadening Endorsement 1. Broad From Property Damage Liability
2. Incidental Redical Halpractice
Liability Coverage
3. Non-Owned Watercraft Liability
Coverage (Under 25' in Length)
4. Limited - Worldwide Liability Coverage
5. Additional Persons Insured
6. Extended Bodily Injury Coverage
7. Automated Coverage - Newly Acquired
8. Alienated Premises Coverage
9. Explosion, Collapse & Underground
(X, C & U) Property Liability Coverage
K.Emergency Nedical Technicians
1. $250 Deductible
L. Property Damage
1. $1,000 Deductible, Per Occurrence
600,000
1,000
Included
Included
Included
Included
50,000
Included
COVERAGES Cont'd
V. POLICE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY
Liait of Liability
1. Personal Injury, Bodily Injury,
Property Dalage & Punitive
Dalages
2. $1,000 Deductible
$ 600,000
Per Occurrence
VI.
LIQUOR LEGAL LIABILITY (Dra~ Shop)
Liait of Liability
1. Bodily Injury
2. Property Daaage
3. Loss of Means of Support
500,000
500,000
500,000
VII.
AUTOHOBILE LIABILITY & PHYSICAL DAMAGE
Li&biliity
1. Linits of Liability
a. Personal Injury Protection
600,000
20,000/
20,000
600,000
Uninsured & Underinsured Motorists
Hired Autolobiles
E~ployer's Non-ownership
Be
Physical Damage Deductibles
1. Comprehensive - See Schedule
2. Collision - See Schedule
SCHEDULE OF VEHICLES
STREET DEPARTMENT
1. 1974 VAC-ALL 1843
2. 1978 CHEVROLET PUMPER TRUCK 0638
3. 1981 FORD 2 & 1/2 TON TRUCK W/PLOW & WING 5610
4. 1979 DITCHWITCH TRAILER
5. 1983 FORD LB00 7082
6. 1985 FORD DUMP TRUCK W/PLOW
WING & SANDER 5958
7. 1987 CHEVROLET PICKUP 9201
8. 1986 FORD DUMP 5440
9. 1983 FORD LTD 5309 (TRANSFERRED FROM POLICE)
10. 1978 CHEVROLET DUMP TRUCK 3151
PARK DEPARTMENT
11. 1982 CHEVROLET 3/4 TON 4 X 4
W/PLOW & UTILITY BOX
12. 1990 CHEVROLET 3/4 TON PICKUP 4799
13. 1990 CHEVROLET 1 TON DUMP 1658
WATER DEPARTMENT
14. 1973 CHEVROLET DUMP TRUCK 0589
15. 1987 PONTIAC 6000 7165 (TRANSFERRED FROM POLICE)
16. 1991 CHEVROLET PICKUP 3738
SEWER DEPARTMENT
17. 1985 CHEVROLET DIESEL PICKUP 1286
18. 1975 FORD TANK TRUCE 2815
19. 1973 TANK TRUCK 1887
20. 1987 CHEVROLET PICKUP 1471
21. 1979 FORD W/RODDING MACHINE
1/2 TON 0841
22. 1970 FORD TRUCK W/FLUSHER
UNIT 3317
23. 1987 CHEVROLET PICKUP 9118
$250 DED COMP
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
$500 DED ~
NO COLL
NO COLL
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
$15,500
X
X
X
X
X
X
SCHEDULES OF VEHICLES (CONT'D)
POLICE DEPARTMENT
24. 1989 CHEVROLET SIO PICKUP 2967
25. 1988 CHEVROLET BERETTA 7699
26. 1989 PONTIAC BONNEVILLE 2998
27. 1989 PONTIAC BONNEVILLE 2238
28. 1986 CHEVROLET CAVALIER 9596
29. 1990 PONTIAC BONNEVILLE 3430
30. 1990 PONTIAC BONNEVILLE 3360
31. 1991 PONTIAC BONNEVILLE 7318
32. 1991 CHEVROLET CUMINO 0877
33.
ADMINISTRATIVE
1990 DODGE DYNASTY 3037
$250 DED COMP
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
$500 DED~
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
$14,200
$11,750
X
INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
34. 1990 DODGE DYNASTY 3036
FIRE DEPARTMENT
35. 1954 DODGE 3/4 TON VAN 1456
36. 1969 MACK #11 PUMPER FIRE TRUCK
37. 1973 MACK #12 PUMPER FIRE TRUCK
38. 1974 CHEVROLET RESCUE VAN
#14 (EXC. OF EQUIP.) 1974
39. 1976 FORD TANKER S 1709
40. 1981 SUTPHEN MODEL T5-100
FIRE TRUCK S 1524
41. 1984 FORD PUMPER TRUCK 1441
42. 1987 CHEVREOLET FIRE CHASSIS
FIRE RESCUE VEHICLE 59503
43. 1968 FORD TANKER TRUCK 0306
44. 1990 EMERGENCY RESUCE VEHICLE
1139
1508
X
$250 DED
COMP
NO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STATED
AMOUNT
$130,000
140,000
15,000
60,000
350,000
150,000
54,750
15,000
200,000
X
$500 D~.u
COMP
NO
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
COVERAGES Cont'd
VIII.
INLAND HARINE COVERAGES
Type of Equipment
1. Contractor's Equipaent
2. Radio Equipaent
Perils Insured Against
1. All Risk As Per Company For~s
2. $ 1,000 Deductible
Schedule of Equipment
1. STREET DEPARTHENT
1970 Cat Gardener 120, S#SN14K1983
1 Air Compressor & 2 Hammers
1981 Elgin Street Sweeper
1 Trackless HT Diesel Snow Blower
1 Roller - Raygo 2-36
1974 Asplundh Clipper
1 1984 Cat Loader, S#2289
1 Oiler
1981 Ford Cherry Picker S#8714
1989 Elgis Street Sweeper
631,300
31,780
140,000
26,000
70,000
50,000
23,000
13,500
70,000
10,000
15,000
83,000
TOTAL
FIRE DEPARTHENT
8000 Feet of 2 $ 1/2' Hose 8 $1.80
6000 Feet of I & 1/2' Hose 8 $1.40
3200 Feet of 4' Hose
I Hearst Tool
480,500
16,000
9,000
19,200
10,000
TOTAL
$ 54,200
INLAND MARINE COVERAGES Cont'd
Schedule of Equipment Cont'd
3. STREET DEPARTMENT
1 1976 Jet Machine
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
5 Kustom Signals HR 12 Moving
Radars @ 1,700 Each
4 Overhead Consoles 8 $900
POLICE DEPARTMENT RADIOS
8 G.E. VHF Police Mobiles
8 $1,500 (Bolted in Squads)
5 G.E. UHF Police Mobiles
8 $1,500
6 Portables 8 $1,500
Johnson Mobile Units
$714 (Bolted in Squads)
5 Light Bars & Sirens 8 $1,500
TOTAL
PARKS DEPARTMENT
1974 Ford 2000 w/Loader
1987 Melroe 843 Diesel Bobcat
1) 72' Gravel Bucket
2) Pallet Forks
3) Gappler
4) Land Scapper
5) Tree Spade
TOTAL
23,000
$ 23,000
500
600
12, 100
12,000
500
000
370
500
39,370
20,000
16,000
500
400
700
700
700
Ce
INLAND HARINE COVERAGES Cont'd
Schedule of Equipaent Cont'd
5. PARKS DEPARTNENT Cont'd
6) Cab Enclosure
1984 Howard Turf Blazer
72" Diesel 727
1987 10,000 LB Dual Axel Trailer
w/Tool Bin & Ramps
TOTAL
200
13,000
1,800
$ 54,000
IX.
COVERAGES Cont'd
PUBLIC OFFICIALS ERRORS & OHISSIONS
A. Limit of Liability 1. Includes Prior Acts Coverages
2. Deductibles
$
$
600,000
2,500
#ORKERS' COMPENSATION
A. Employer's Liability
Based on Payroll
1. Street Construction
2. Naterworks
3. Volunteer Fireman ~
4. Policemen
5. Off Sale Liquor Store
6. Clerical Office
7. Parks
8. Elected or Appointed
Officials
$200/600/200,000
#5506
#7520
#7708
#7720
#8017
#8810
#9102
#9411
$
$
$
$
$
210,000
100,000
16,283
460,000
90,000
300,000
60,000
18,200
CITY OF MOUND
PREMIUM SUMMARY
FEBRUARY 1992
CODE # 1991/92 1992/93
I PROPERTY $ 11,049 $ 9,764
1 CRIME $ 293 $ 272
I EQUIPMENT $ 3,296 $ 3,081
I GENERAL LIABILITY $ 49,772 $ 48,011
1 AUTOMOBILE $ 25,285 $ 23,556
2 LIQUOR $ 5,148 $ 8,575
1 EMT'S INCLUDED INCLUDED
1 PUBLIC OFFICIALS
E & 0 $ 5,757 $ 5,628
I POLICE PROFESSIONAL INCLUDED INCLUDED
3 WORKERS' COMPENSATION $ 80,770 $ 57,845
4 BONDS $ 1,238 $ 1,238
5 FIREMAN'S ACCIDENT & HEALTH $ 250 $ 250
1 LOSS OF INCOME $ 331
TOTALS $162,858 $156,551
CODE #
1) LEAGUE OF CITIES INSURANCE TRUST THROUGH BERKLEY RISK SERVICES
2) TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE CONPANY (CNA) THROUGH JOHN H. CROWTHER
3) LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST THROUGH E.B.A.
4) CAPITAL INDEMNITY
5) HEALTH SPECIAL RISK
CITY of MOUND
534.1 MAYWOOD R~,AD
MOUND MINNESOTA 5-_-_:54 ~687
,6!2, 472-i 15.=
FAX 612 472 0'_-2;
MOUND LIQUOR STORE
1991 ANNUAL REPORT
JOEL KRUMM, MANAGER
By now everyone knows that 1991 was a banner year for the Liquor store. As
a matter of fact, 1991 was undoubtedly the finest year ever since the conception of
the store in terms of sales and profits. To explain how good of a year it was it is only
appropriate to compare it to another year, and the barometer I will use in my
comparison will be the preceding year, 1990. To do such an analysis, I am forced to
use dollar figures, percentages, gross and net profits, etc. I apologize for this because
I know for some of you all these figures can be boring at times. However, if you bear
with me, I believe you will find the results both encouraging and enlightening. The
good news is that I intend to be brief. Why dwell on past accolades? It is my firm
belief that it one does so, he or she could become complacent, and miss the golden
opportunity that the future holds.
SALES
Total net sales, excluding State sales tax, for 1991 were $1,144,247. Total
net sales for 1990 was $939,258. In January 1992's monthly report, I informed you
that I had increased sales by 67% over the 7.5 years since I have been managing
here. The increase in 1991 over that of 1990 was an unbelievable 21.85%. I believe
only Wallmart can boast of higher sales. I would bet the house (not my life though)
that there was not another liquor store, private or municipal, in the state of Minnesota
that had that high of a percentage increase in sales. There were several factors that
contributed to this high volume. The most significant of them being the startling
number of more customers (8127) that shopped the store than over the previous year.
Since the average sale per customer for the year was $11.19, this extra surge in
customers attribute for $90,941 in new business. What was responsible for the
remaining $105,333 in growth was basically that the cost of goods, due to the higher
excise tax imposed by the federal government, was up approximately 9% in 1991
over that of 1990.
printed on recycled paper
PROFITS
The one aspect for the year and the one that I am sure interests and concerns
you the most was the tremendous increase in profits generated by the store for the
City. If you look at the attached "Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Operating
Income" document and look at the Gross Profit Line, derived by subtracting the cost
of goods from total sales, you will see a figure of $270,537 or 23.64% of the sales.
Both dollar amount and percentage are the best this store has ever witnessed. Then,
by performing one more simple calculation, subtract operating expenses from the
gross profit, you will arrive at a net operating income, before transfers and non-
operating revenue, of $98,553, or 8.61% of the total sales. Again, both figures
represent the highest numbers ever achieved at the Mound Liquor store. The figure
of $98,553 is $43,303 more than 1990, or an increase of around 78%! At this point
I may stake my life by maintaining that again no other store in the state had a better
percentage increase.
Nothing more need be said nor has to be said about the liquor operations for
1991. Anything else would only be redundant and slightly garrulous. But I would like
to take this opportunity, for the record, to give my sincerest thanks to a select group
of people who assisted, aided, supported and who put up with me throughout the
year. A special congratulations should go to my assistant manager, Julie Clyne, who
has dedicated herself to the City for 20 years. She always was, has been and always
will be the most dependable, reliable and most trustworthy employee I have ever had
the pleasure to be associated with. Thanks Julie. I would also like to extend my
appreciation to my part time staff; Dave Onken, Rick Hanson, Toby Trevis, Jon
Muhich, Jori Schuler and Pete Klein. The better part of this group has been with me
for over a year now which is unheard of in this business. Keep it up you guys and
thanks. I would also like to thank you, Mr. Mayor, Councilmembers and the City
Manager for allowing me a free reign in operating this business. Sometimes the best
and wisest intervention is no intervention at all..Your faith in me has been the key to
the success and continued growth of a sometimes often forgotten part of the City of
Mound. But today, especially with the cutbacks in state aid to cities, the liquor
operations suddenly becomes an integral and important cog in municipalities that are
struggling and searching for much needed revenues.
JN:ls
CITY OF MOUND
LIQUOR FUND
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, AND OPERATING INCOME
PERIODS ENDING
SALES
DECEMBER ~ DECEMBER ~
1991 SALES 1990 SALES
Liquor 385116 33.66~ 332538
Wioe 155218 13.57~ 126504
Beer 569790 49.80~ 4606?8
Miscellaneous 39685 3.47~ 23885
Discount -5562 -0.49X -4320
TOTAL SALES 1144247 lc)0.00~ 939285
COST OF GOODS
873710 76.36Z 781268
35.40~
13.47~
49.05~
8.54~
-0.46~
100.00~
23.21~
17.33~
5.88~
GROSS PROFIT
EXPENSES
OPERATING INC
270537 23.64Z 218017
171984 15.03Z 162767
98553 8.61Z 55250
DECEMBER
1989
297156
121149
453899
83338
-3514
898028
683553
208475
159749
48726
SALES
33.31~
13.58~
50.88~
2.62K
-0.39~
100.00~
23.37~
5.46~
YEAR END INCOME
(per audit)
108154 64035 56148
TRANSFERS OUT
68538 43161 49749
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Telephone 472-0621
Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
February 18, 1992
Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager
City of Mound
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mr. Shukle:
Contained within the following pages is the annual report for
the police department. The report addresses the budget,
personnel, training, equipment, community education,
statistics, and emergency preparedness.
This was the first year in the newly remodeled and expanded
building. The additional space has made the job easier in
that everything is much more conveniently placed and has a
much higher degree of safety.
In 1991, reduction in LGA made the budgeting process more
"exciting" as we each had to trim our budgets mid-way through
the year. The department continued its relationship with the
Southwest Metro Drug Task Force and Sgt. Hudson continued as
the administrator/coordinator and is doing an excellent job.
We continued to present the D.A.R.E. program in the 5th and
7th grades with excellent community support. The budget
expenditures were 2.2% under projections; primarily due to
additional reimbursements from the Task Force.
Part I and Part II offenses accounted for 1,072 calls for
service, consistent with 1990. Total contacts were down by
3.4%, but Part I offenses were up by 17%. The decrease in
overall contacts reflects less traffic encounters in 1991.
The department continues to emphasize dedication to the
community through the highest standards of service and through
quality training for its employees. The department
collectively developed a mission statement that commits to
professional conduct and meeting our citizens needs.
Sincere~, ~ ~
I.~n Hhrrell, Chief
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
X.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Budget Administration
Organizational Chart
Personnel
Training
Equipment
Community Education
Statistics
Emergency Preparedness
Southwest Metro Drug Task Force
PAGE
1
2
3
4
13
15
16
18
27
28
INTRODUCTION
The mission of the Mound Police Department is to
provide protection and service to the people of
Mound. Many of the activities of the. police
department are described and summarized in this
report for 1991.
MOUND POLICE MISSION STATEMENT:
The Mound Police Department, through teamwork and
oooperation, will be responsive to our citizens,
needs with a professional level of dedicated
service. Officers will display the highest
integrity, and regard each citizen with a focused
and unbiased attitude. Our citizens will determine
our succeSSo
Much of how a police department is evaluated is
based on statistics, as found in this report.
Information for these statistics comes from internal
record-keeping and also from participation in the
Minnesota Criminal Justice System (CJIS).
In analyzing the crime, statistics, several factors
need to be considered.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Population density
Proximity to metropolitan area
Population composition
Population stability
Number, sophistication, and development of
police personnel
The only area that the police department has control
is the fifth category. The police department is
consistently looking at ways to better utilize and
train personnel to provide better service.
The report is provided to highlight the most
important areas of police department activity and to
be used as a gauge for evaluating service. The
report includes some comparisons to past years and
provides a tool for planning activities in the years
to come.
II.
BUDGET ADMINISTRATION
The 1991 police budget will close out with a 2.2%
savings over the original projections ($16,810).
The final expenditures for the police department
amounted to $725,950.00. The percentage of
expenditures breaks out as follows:
Personnel
Insurance
Capitol Outlay
Training/Travel
(includes P.O.S.T.)
Fuel/Repairs
All Other
$604,153.00 83.2%
28,249.00 4.0%
23,396.00 3.2%
9,046.00 1.2%
21,501.00 3.0%
39,605.00 5.4%
TOTAL $725,950.00 100%
Fund 60 (vehicle)
15,918.00
Areas where we realized unexpected savings included
insurance, over-time, and we received reimbursement
from the task force above the revenue projected for
salaries. Officers chose to take more of their
compensation in comp-time versus over-time and saved
about 4%. Another area where there was some savings
involved the resignation of Rob Meuwissen and the
delay of two months before Amy Christenson was
hired.
The police department generated revenues of $64,000
from court fines and violations. Animal licenses
and pick-ups accounted for $4,628 of revenue.
Accident reports generated $953.
Minnesota Police Pension and P.O.S.T. Board
reimbursements totaled $60,516 and $4,927
respectively. The Southwest Metro Drug Task Force
reimbursed the department $77,944 for officers
assigned to the task force; original projection was
$60,000.
Z
Z
, !
IV.
Personnel
Sworn Personnel:
Chief of Police
Sergeants
Investigators
D.A.R.E. Officer
Patrol Officers
1.0
1.0
2.0
.6
6.4
11.0
Drug Task Force
Sergeant 1.0
Officer 1.0
Total Sworn Personnel 13.0
Non-Sworn Personnel:
Police Secretary 1.0
Part-Time Personnel:
Code Enforcement Off.
1.0
Total Police Personnel 15.0
(.75 FTE)*
(14.75 FTE)*
*FTE = Full Time Equivalent
4
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PERSONNEL ROSTER
1991
Chief of Police
Leonard Harrell
Staff Sergeant
William Hudson
(Assigned to Drug Task Force)
Patrol Serqeant
Brad Roy
Investiqator/Liaison
Steve Grand
John McKinley
Patrol Officers
Ronald Bostrom
John Ewald
Todd Truax
Gary Lotton (Task Force 10/91)
Todd Limond (Task Force 01/91-09/91)
Darrell Huggett & Canine "Rambo"
Daniel Niccum
Robert Meuwissen (Resigned 03/91)
Amy Christenson (Hired 05/91)
Police Secretary
Shirley Hawks
Code Enforcement Officer
June Hyland
Police Reserves
Dave Nelson
Sarah Nassett
Jason Swenson
Sherry Zuccaro
Jeff Fleming
James Fox
Kathleen Fox
Tom Geyen
Kevin Husk
Sam Nelson
Paul Haarstad
Lenny Allee
Larry Lyng
Terry Erdman
Lind Norton
Jackie Koepp
Robin Liljeberg
In 1991, the police department consisted of thirteen
sworn officers, including two officers assigned to
the Southwest Metro Drug Task Force. Sgt. Hudson
was assigned to be the task force administrator and
Officer Limond worked with him until October when he
was replaced by Gary Lotton. Officer Limond
returned to take over the D.A.R.E. program for the
second half of the year and is doing an excellent
job from all accounts. Investigators Grand and
McKinley continue to be responsible for case follow-
up with Grand having juvenile responsibility.
The department has continued with regular
evaluations of the police employees. In general,
the officers have been doing a fine job in serving
the community. There was some disciplinary action
with individual officers and their conduct is being
monitored. There were three internal investigations
initiated with disciplinary action taken in one of
the cases.
Psychological re-evaluations were given to two
officers in 1991. The process continues the
psychological testing for each officer every five
years.
The department has again maintained involvement in
the Southwest Metro Drug Task Force and has received
reimbursement for officers provided as agents. The
communities involved are Chanhassen, Carver County,
South Lake Minnetonka, St. Boni/Minnetrista, Scott
County, Shakopee, Chaska, and Prior Lake. See
section X for the annual report of the Southwest
Metro Drug Task Force.
Officer Huggett continues to workwith "Rambo" and
has consistently been training with him. "Rambo"
earned a P.D. #1 certification through the United
States Police Canine Ass'n.
The Mound Police Reserves continue to do an
excellent job for the community and the police
department. Sgt. Roy has been assigned the liaison
for the reserves. Unit strength averaged around
fifteen volunteers for 1991. The Mound Police
Reserves combined to donate a total of 4,898 hours.
Child protection cases accounted for 51
investigations in 1991. Total contacts were down
3.4%; a decrease in traffic violations being the
bulk of the reduction in contacts. Alarming is the
fact that Part I offenses were up 17%, with
burglaries having a 48% increase, larcenies up 17 %,
and vehicle theft up 8%. There was also a dramatic
increase in vehicular accidents; 38%. Although not
empirical data, one needs to consider the effect of
traffic contacts on all areas of public safety.
The investigators worked on several cases of
significance during the year. Investigator Grand
worked up a major case involving the theft of cable
services that was submitted to the County Attorney.
Other cases cleared by Inv. Grand included a robbery
at gun point, the multiple cases of the theft of
hood ornaments from vehicles, a criminal sexual
conduct case involving the rape of a room-mate's
girlfriend, and a child abuse case involving three
generations of inter-familial sexual abuse.
Investigator McKinley cleared cases involving the
forgery of checks that led to several arrests and
the resolution of cases in eight other communities
as well as the recovery of a truck-load of stolen
property. Additionally, McKinley solved several
snowmobile thefts with the arrests of several local
suspects and solved a rash of burglaries that
occurred in the fall and recovered numerous stolen
items.
Officers and staff used a total of 493 days of
benefit time during 1991. The time off included
approximately 185 vacation days, 139 holidays, 99.5
comp days, and 69.5 sick days. officers earned 832
hours of comp-time and 782.5 hours of overtime
during the year. Officers chose to take
approximately 250 hours more in comp-time than in
overtime as compared to 1990; a monetary savings of
over $6,000.00.
HOUND POLICE RESERVES
ANNUAL REPORT
1991
~ADGE
1
4
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
20
22
23
26
28
58
59
60
54
19
TOTAL
pETAILS
EHER RES. COHH H/F TRAIN [NSTR RIDE
C/O SQUAD SERV BALL lNG TION ALONG
12.5 18.0 73.5 5.5 35.5 29.5 16.5
8.0 41.0 35.5 25.5 12.5 34.5
18.5 57.0 62.0 15.0 17.0 2.0 42.5
64.0 59.5 194.5 232.5 121.5
2.5
28.0 2.5
6.0 18.0 10.0
9.0 27.5 26.0
21.5 17.0 1.5
41.5 32.5 47.0
4.0 22.0 43.5
14.5 14.5 52.0
6.5 34.0 5.0
2.5
6.5
3.5
16.5
3.0
14.0
6.0
4.0
28.5 98.5 8.0 10.5
o
237.0 467.5 565.0 108.5
34.0
148.5
58.0
343.0
171.0
12.0
172.0
108.0
16.0
352.5
22.0
274.0
128.0
44.0
2180.5
32.5
45.5
43.5
88.5
7.5
208.5
24.5
26.0
116.0
94.5
869.5
ADMIN
176.0
15.5
21.5
34.5
1.5
5.0
11.0
44.5
1.5
311.0
NEET
ING
16.0
13.0
13.0
20.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
7.5
5.5
6.5
9.5
3.0
14.0
4.5
3.0
8.5
127.0
TOTAL
383.0
185.5
248.5
726.5
0
0
34.0
6.0
232.0
0
59.0
433.0
32
87.5
522.0
208.0
196.5
526.0
25.0
4.0
522.5
128.0
44.0
4898.5
MOUND POLICE RESERVES
ANNUAL REPORT
The Mound Police Reserves donated 4,898 hours in
1991. The unit has averaged 15 individuals for the
past year and those people have been very active in
serving the community.
The police reserves assisted in providing the
following security services and/or police back-up
at:
Emergency call outs
Reserve squad - house checks
High school dances
Hockey and football games
Pinewood Derby
Mound city Days
Dance for Heart
EFCE Public Safety Day
Spring Park Crazy Days
officer Friendly assists
Earth Day Ceremonies
Westonka Homecoming parade
M.D.A. Telethon
Wayzata fireworks
Westonka senior overnight party
Incredible Festival
Child finger printing
Halloween and "Kiddie" parades
city Auction
Jaycees Bike Rodeo
Homecoming Parade
Christmas Tree Lighting
Our Lady of the Lake Marathon
PTO Variety Show
Memorial Day Parade
Mound Westonka High School Graduation
Rotary Dinner for 100
Fish Fry
Traffic Direction (funerals, fires, utility)
Special Olympics
The Mound Police Reserves received training in
first-aid and CPR, defensive tactics, and new
officers attended the Hennepin County Reserve
officers Course.
10
Finances:
The reserves continue to raise their own funds and
are predominantly self-sufficient. The emergency
preparedness budget also contributes funds to the
maintenance of training and equipment for the police
reserves.
The police reserve account has about $4,900 in
balance. The severance fund encumbrance is
approximately $2,200.00
1!
RESERVE ACTIVITIES FOR 1991
Heetings
Ride-AJongs
Reserve Squad
Hockey Games
PR-24 Recertification
Funerat
Dances
Transports
Hennepin County Auxitiary Schoot
Pressure Point Review
St. Ctoud Driving Schoot
Pubtic Safety Show
Fingerprinting - Brownies
Casino Night - OLL
City #aLt Open House
Scout Troop Tour
Reserve Oance
Rotary Oinner
First Responder Recertification
Safety Days
Fire
Mound City Days
Bike Rodeo
ECO - Gas Leak
Speciat Otympics Torch Run
Incredibte Festivat
Footbatt Games
Stake Out - Water Patrol
Homecoming Parade
Scout Troop Tour
OLL WaLk
Christmas Tree Lighting
ECO Wires Down
Training
Squads to Radio
Squads to Repair
POT Variety Show
City Auction
Memoria( Day Parade
Fish Fry
Graduation Party
12
TRAINING
The police department attempts to provide training
on a continual basis to maintain its effectiveness
and efficiency. Modern law enforcement is an ever-
changing environment that requires the development
of special skills and necessitates officers keep
abreast of recent changes in job relevant statutes
and procedures. High standards of excellence are
accomplished by the police department when extensive
training can be offered to both officers and staff.
Police personnel attended the equivalent of 174 days
of training in 1991.
Courses Attended
Verbal Judo
Firearms Training/F.A.T-S-
Wilson Supervisory Leadership Program
Canine Training
Critical Incident/Use of Force
Southern Police Institute Retraining conference
Charitable Gambling
Crash Injury Management/First Responder
Emergency Medical Technician
side-handle Baton
Field Sobriety Testing
Intoxilyzer Course & Refresher
Pursuit Driving
spring Chief's Conference
officer Survival Course
Defensive Tactics - PPCT
Performance Evaluation/Productivity
Hazardous Materials
Crime Prevention
Criminal Justice Information System
Special Event/Dignitary Security
Classroom Instructor
D.A.R.E. Seminar
Narcotics Supervision
I.A.C.P. Conference
Grammar/Report Writing
Undercover Narcotics
Communication Techniques
Drug Recognition for Patrol
Emergency Preparedness
Juvenile officers Institute
Field Training officer
13
~ourses Attended - cont.
Juvenile Issues
Drug Task Force
Reid Interrogation
Defensive Driving
Legislative Update
Criminal Justice Institute
Narcotics Seminar
Human Relations
Disaster Preparedness
Police Decision Making
The Empowered Police Department
Data Practices & Law Enforcement
VI.
EOUIPMENT
Two new vehicles were purchased in 1991. The
vehicles were purchased through the county bid
process and included a Pontiac Bonneville and a
Chevrolet Lumina with V6 engines. The cost of the
Bonneville was significantly higher than the Lumina
and with the reduction in available revenues two
squads could not be purchased. The 1989 unmarked
Bonneville was converted to a marked squad and the
Lumina became an unmarked. An additional unmarked,
a Chevrolet Corsica, was purchased towards the end
of the year to replace the '86 Cavalier wagon for
the investigators.
Weapons were purchased using older weapons as trades
towards reducing the price. Five Smith & Wesson
model 3913 and one Colt 9mm SMG, with laser sight,
were purchased. A firearms locker was purchased for
security while officers are dealing with prisoners.
Office equipment purchases included a new Canon copy
machine and a new IBM typewriter. The department
also had office furniture donated and purchased some
other items needed in the expansion.
15
VII.
COMMUNITY EDUCATION/SERVICE
The police department became involved with the
community in a variety of activities in 1991.
Following is a brief description of the activities.
Special Olympic~
Several officers volunteered to work for the Special
Olympics on their own time. Officers assisted with
ssecurity at a number of different venues.
Crime Prevention
Officer Ewald has been conducting neighborhood
meetings and developing block watches. He has also
been working with several apartment complexes to
organize for Crime Watch. Presentations and
security evaluations have been done for local banks
and businesses.
House Checks
The police reserves provide a service of checking
periodically on out-of-town resident's homes when
notification has been provided to the police
department.
Westonka_Intervention Program
The police department continues to work closely with
the intervention program to assist families that are
victims of domestic abuse.
Department Tours
The police department h'aS conducted a number of
tours of our facility for Cub Scouts and Brownie
Scouts.
Demonstrations/Presentations
The police department has been involved in a number
of public presentations ranging from canine
demonstrations to talks about safety with day-care
students. The police department has talked to
groups concerning drugs, gun safety, vehicle safety,
DWI, and personal safety.
Fingerprinting
The department provides a service of fingerprinting
individuals as may be requested. This includes both
children and adults.
Mound_City_Days
The department was very involved in this year's
celebration. Security was provided for the parade,
the "Around Mound Run", and the fireworks.
D. A. R. E. _Program~
Drug Awareness Resistance Education has been
implemented at both Shirley Hills Elementary,
Grandview Middle School, and Our Lady of the Lake
Schools.
~estonka Community Action Network
The department has been actively involved in
assisting the task force in defining area problems
and developing a network for assisting needy
individuals.
~omecominq Parade
The department assisted the high school with setting
up a parade route and then provided security for the
parade.
--Halloween Parade
Provide security for children during the parade.
Around Mound Run
This last year there was a 5 mile run and two
walking courses that we provided security for.
Qfficer Friendly
Elementary school presentations' for child safety.
YMCA Detached Worker Proqram
The department has established a working
relationship with the detached worker program. The
program assisted in providing activities for "at
risk" children in Mound.
_Public Safety Day
The police department co-sponsored a public safety
open house with Early Childhood & Family Education.
Children were finger printed, observed safety
presentations, and were able to view police fire,
and medical equipment. '
Bike Rodeo
Co-sponsored with the Mohawk Jaycees and Mound Crime
Prevention Ass'n a bike rodeo.
l?
VIII.
This section of the report analyzes the statistical
portion of the annual report. Most of the
information comes from tabulating the information
from Initial Call Reports (ICR's), informational
reports, and traffic citations.
The total number of ICR's in a year is useful for
comparing the level of activity of the department
relative to previous years. It also allows for
comparison between personnel changes and activity
levels. Some reporting changes were made in 1986 to
alleviate statistical duplication that was found in
the previous system.
TOTAL INCIDENTS PER YEAR
1985 THROUGH 1991
YEAR TOTAL
INCIDENTS/MONTH
1985 15,233' 1,269
1986 14,078 1,173
1987 13,445 1,120
1988 15,582 1,298
1989 14,559 1,213
1990 13,680 1,140
1991 13,207 1,101
(Previous 5 Yr. Avg. 14,208
1,184)
*Reflects old gathering system
1991 reflected a decrease in total contacts of 3.4%.
The serious incidents of crime reported to the
police department are categorized into Part I and
Part II Offenses.
Part I Offenses:
Part I Offenses include major crimes such
as homicide, criminal sexual conduct,
robbery, assault, burglary, larceny,
vehicle theft, and arson. Although Part I
Offenses are a small percentage of
reported crimes, it is these crimes that
demand the most attention from the police
department in terms of investigation and
commitment of resources.
Part II Offenses:
Part II Offenses include the crimes of
forgery, child abuse/neglect, vandalism,
stolen property, sexual misconduct,
weapons violations, sexual misconduct,
narcotics violations, liquor violations,
DWI, simple assault, domestic assault,
embezzlement, prostitution, public peace,
runaways, and other violations.
The clearance rate for combined Part I and Part II
Offenses was 47%. Part I offenses were up 17%
compared to last year. Burglaries rose 48%,
larcenies by 17%, and vehicle thefts by 8%. Our
combined clearance rates decreased by 8%.
Part I and Part II Offenses are the incidents that
necessitate the most time and effort from the police
department. Initial call time is greater in
gathering pertinent information at the scene and the
greatest amount of investigation and follow-up is
dedicated to these types of crimes.
Traffic Offenses:
Traffic offenses include both moving and
non-moving violations. An examination of
the number and percentage of traffic
stops, as part of the total number of
incidents, allows one to determine the
degree to which vehicular traffic and
pedestrian movement affects the
department,s work load. It should also be
noted that the more visible that patrols
are maintained, the more likely is the
positive impact in deterring serious
crimes.
In 1991, traffic citations accounted for
1,583 police contacts, down 13% from 1990.
Traffic citations are down 37% for a two
year period. Property damage accidents
were up 32% and personal injury accidents
were up 57% from 1990.
There were 79 DWI arrests (down 19%) and
of those, 33% were repeat offenders for
gross misdemeanor or aggravated
19
violations. The average test was .162; up
from 1990. The highest reading was a
.251; the legal limit is .10.
Property:
Property losses were valued at $334,359.00
in 1991. The department recovered
$157,804.00; or 47%.
Child Protection Cases:
The department investigated 51 child
protection cases for the year. These
cases continue to be the single most time-
consuming cases we handle.
Domestic Dispute Cases:
The department responded to 76 domestic
situations; 44 with assaults. The number
of actual domestic assaults rose 33%, but
the number of total domestics remained
fairly constant.
Arrests:
The police department processed and booked
243 adults in 1991. There were 35 adults
arrested for felonies, 283 adults for
misdemeanors, 20 juveniles arrested for
felonies, and 110 juveniles arrested for
misdemeanors.
In addition, 100 formal complaints were
issued for a variety of crimes.
Animal Complaints:
The department responded to 1,105 animal
complaints during 1991.
20
NOtJND POLICE DEPARTHENT
POLICE/CRIHE ACTIVITY REPORT
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
Hazardous Citation 1,225 1,56( 1,172 1,333 1,429 1,082 835
Non-Hazardous Citations 949 668 519 617 356 340 280
Hazardous 14arnings 461 685 417 346 137 74 32
Non-Hazardous ~larnings 1,216 1,311 868 643 351 333 341
Verbal t~arnings 1,521 1,368 1.503 1,273
Parking Citations 1,075 738 497' 639 604 381 468
D$4 ! 106 127 104 91 62 97 79
Over. 10 75 95 75 44 35 71 52
Property Daraage Accidents [ [ 5 96 99 121 102 74 98
Persona[ Injury Accidents 47 29 36 36 29 21 33
Fatal Accidents 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*Adult Felony Arrests
*Adult Misdemeanor Arrests
*Juvoni[e Felony Arrests
*Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests
37 52 44 36 51 61 48
450 447 281 359 335 590 404
57 50 59 79 35 50 21
110 175 120 108 68 206 115
Part I Offenses
Report~ 360 ~1 3~ 417 353 322 3~
C~eared ~ 113 ~ ~ 1~ 112 91
Arrests Made 81 67 74 70 75 91 55
Part II Offenses
Reported 676 ~ 789 857 ?25 767 694
Cleared 234 617 457 209 227 493 438
Arrests Made 160 359 311 319 242 401 331
Medica[s 276 168 218 274 315 371 325
Animal Complaints 1,318 1,205 1,128 1,091 1,097 887 1,105
Other General Investigations 6,621 5,043 5,442 6,729 6,780 6,280 6,503
TOTAL
15,174 13,890 13,2__34 15,407 14,2.32 13,276 13,084
Assists 777 521 691 672 549 631
Fo[tow-qos 527 520 600 297 192 164
Mutual Aid 188 211 175 210 160 123
*Also includes warrant arrests through 1988
21
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT
YEAR 1991
GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY
YEAR TO
DATE
Hazardous Citations
Non-Hazardous Citations
Hazardous Warnings
Non-Hazardous Warnings
Verbal Warnings
Parking Citations
DWI
Over .10
Property Damage Accidents
Personal Injury Accidents
Fatal Accidents
Adult Felony Arrests
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests
Adult Misdemeanor Citations
Juvenile Felony Arrests
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests
Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations
Part I Offenses
Part II Offenses
Medicals
Animmal Complaints
Other Public Contacts
835
280
32
341
1,273
468
79
52
98
33
0
48
324
8O
21
66
49
378
694
325
1,105
6,503
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
1,082
340
74
333
1,503
391
97
71
74
21
0
61
443
147
5O
119
87
322
767
371
887
6,280
TOTAL
Assists
Follow-Ups
Henn. County Child Protection
Mutual Aid Given
Mutual Aid Requested
13,084
631
164
55
123
46
13,520
549
192
62
160
72
22
OF FENSES
REPORTED
YEARLY REPORT,
CLEARED EXCEPT.
UNFOUNDED CLEARED
1991
CLEARED BY
ARREST
ARRESTED
ADULT JUVENILE
PART ! CRIMES
Homicide 0 0 0 0
Crimina[ Sexua[ Conduct 15 0 5 7
Robbery 2 1 0 1
Aggravated Assault 6 0 0 3
Burgtary 74 0 6 6
Larceny 251 12 17 24
Vehicle Theft 26 2 2 4
Arson 4 0 0 1
0 0
4 3
2 2
1 0
5 2
20 12
2 1
I 0
TOTAL 3?8 15 30 46 35
PART Il CRIMES
Child Abuse/Neglect 47 4 26 1 2
Forgery/NSF Checks 41 1 22 13 12
Criminal Damage to Property 130 0 20 7 6
Weapons 7 0 3 4 2
Narcotics 25 1 0 24 27
Liquor La~s 43 0 1 42 31
DWI 79 0 0 79 78
simpte Assault :56 2 16 9 4
Domestic Assautt 44 10 9 24 29
Domestic (No Assautt) 32 0 0 0 0
Harassment 103 1 2 8 1
Runauay/lncorrigibitity/Truancy 54 0 10 42 0
Pubtic Peace 16 0 19 11 14
Trespassing 4 0 2 0 0
Att Other Offenses 33 1 5 19 15
0
3
2
2
0
1
?
2
0
58
3
0
5
TOTAL 694 20 135 283
PART III & PART IV
Property Damage Accidents 98
Persormt lnjury Accidents 33
Fatal Accidents 0
Hedicats 299
Animal Complaints 1,105
Nutuat Aid 122
Other Generat Investigatior~ 6,503
221 110
TOTAL 8,160
Hennepin County Child Protection 55
CHIPS ?
TOTAL 9,294
35 165 329 256
150
23
Zig
PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SUMMARY
YEARLY REPORT, 1991
Bikes
Snowmobiles
Clothing
Currency, Notes, Etc.
Jewelry & Precious Metals
Guns
Home Furnishings
Radio & Electronic Equipment
Vehicles & Vehicle Equipment
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
STOLEN
$ 3,438
24,750
2,218
9,066
15,429
2,395
760
17,932
63,600
194,771
$334,359
RECOVERED
$ 733
18,850
0
779
10,000
50O
350
648
73,100
52,844
$157,804
24
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
YEARLY REPORT, 1991
CITATIONS
DWI
More than .10% BAC
Careless/Reckless Driving
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speeding
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired, or No Plates
Illegal Passing
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving the Scene
No Insurance
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog Ordinances
Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
MV/ATV
Miscellaneous Tags
TOTAL
25
ADULT .JUV
79 0
52 0
2 0
58 2
5 0
549 43
14 7
7 0
152 3
1 1
61 1
6 0
23 0
2 0
17 1
2 1
5 1
468 0
4 1
20 0
1 0
90 2
2 2
4--5 _ 1
1,665 66
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
YEARLY REPORT, 1991
WARNINGS
No Insurance
Traffic
Equipment
Crosswalk
Animals
Trash/Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
Trespassing
Window Tint
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
ADULT
181
33
122
3
27
40
0
0
21
8
435
JUV
17
3
17
1
0
0
0
4
3
0
45
ARRESTS
Warrants: 203
26
IX.
~MERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (CIVIL DEFENSE)
The Emergency Preparednass budge% again came in
under original projections. Doradus Corporation now
holds the maintenance agreement and our siren costs
were the main reason for the savings.
Hazardous materials continues to be a major concern
for Emergency Preparedness. I become a certified
emergency manager in 1991 through the state
Department of Emergency Management.
The City receives approximately $4,000 from FEMA
(Federal Emergency Management Ass'n.) in the form of
a grant. We spent $2,405.78 for emergency
preparedness in addition to salaries that are
accounted for in the police budget.
Xe
Southwest Metro Drug Task Force
Attached is the annual report of the drug task force
in which we are a member. We currently have Sgt.
Hudson and Gary Lotton assigned and received
reimbursement for their salaries through a federal
grant from the office of Drug Policy. I believe the
task force is doing an excellent job and deserves
our continued support. The major drugs of use in
our area continues to be cocaine, marijuana, and
LSD.
SOUTHWEST METRO DRUG TASK FORCE
1991 ANNUAL REPORT
TO
FROM:
DATE:
Southwest Metro Drug Task Force Committee
Sgt. William M. Hudson
Task Force Coordinator
1/9/92
Law Enforcement Agencies involved in Task Force:
Mound Police Department
Chaska Police Department
Shakopee Police Department
Prior Lake Police Department
Scott County Sheriff's Department
Carver County Sheriff's Department
Chanhassen Public Safety Department
St Boni/Minnetrista Public Safety Department
South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department
Task Force service area:
Scott County, Carver County, and a portion of Southwestern
Hennepin, approximate population 125,000.
Agencies with officers assigned to Task Force:
Mound Police Department-two officers assigned, one as the
Task Force coordinator, and the other as an agent.
Carver County Sheriff's Department- one deputy assigned as
a agent.
Shakopee Police Department- one
agent. This agent was assigned
year.
officer assigned as an
for nine months of the
Each county does have an attorney assigned to the Task
Force: Peter Ivy from Carver County, Gail Biez from
Hennepin County, and Conrad Skonieczny from Scott County.
Peter Ivy attends all committee meetings.
Officers assigned to Task Force
Hudson, Officers Limond, Lotton,
Deputies Spielman and Robbins.
in 1991: Sgt William
Jackson, Nelson and
Officer Jackson was hired on a contract basis to the Task
Force, served only 1 month, and was hired by Bloomington.
Deputy Robbins was assigned in the last half of December
when Deputy Spielman was reassigned to his department.
During 1991 the Task Force had one assigned officer
without any salary reimbursement. With this additional
officer, the Task Force had 5 officers assigned, which is
the goal of the Task Force.
Due to shortage of coverage this caused at the home
agency, the officer had to be reassigned to his
department.
Task Force location change:
The Task Force was housed at the South Lake Minnetonka
Public Safety building in Excelsior since 1987.
On 11/1/91, the Task Force moved to a new location, the
old Corps of Engineers office in the Chaska Municipal
building. The Task Force gained about four times the room
it had at the previous location. It is hoped that the
Task Force will be at the new location for the next two
years.
With the added room at the new location, the Task Force
office provides each agent with his/her own desk and
computer terminal/working area, allowing the agents to
utilize their time more efficiently.
Investigations conducted in 1991:
During 1991, 105 cases were made, involving 120 different
~eople. There were 40 search warrants executed resulting
in the seizure of 13 handguns and 22 long guns, and five
vehicles. Summary Forfeitures have been filed on one
house, and another is under consideration.
The following are dollar amounts of drugs (street value)
that were seized/purchased
Cocaine $ 8065
Marijuana $ 59670
Marijuana Plants $ 32000
LSD $ 44240
Methamphetamine $ 16790
Mushrooms $ 500
Hash Oil $ 100
Value of Drugs Purchased/Seized $161,365.00
The case break down is as follows:
Sale of marijuana 34
Possession of marijuana 24
Sale of cocaine 8
Possession of cocaine 7
Sale of LSD 15
Possession of LSD 2
Sale of methamphetamine 1
Possession of methamphetamine 6
Sale of mushrooms 1
Sale of alcohol to minors 6
Possession of stolen property 1
Cases involved the following counties:
Dakota County 5 Scott County 22
Carver County 36 Rice County 1
Hennepin County 40 Wright County 1
Cases charged federal 2
Cases charged state 103
The Task Force did not 9o out of its service area unless
the subject of the investigation was in some way
furnishing drugs to person/persons in the Task Force
service area. The Task Force has found that
person/persons dealing in drugs do not stay in just one
location, but travel far and wide to other areas to buy or
sell drugs. This is what is referred to as networking. In
making arrest in any of the above cities, there ~s a
direct effect on the other cities in the Task Force
Service area. The Task Force in fact found it common place
for the person or persons arrested above to be selling and
or buying other than where they were arrested.
Significant cases made:
In reviewin~ the below cases, it will become apparent what
networking ~s and how it works. As already stated, there
may not have been a specific arrest made in a community in
the Task Force service area, but there is a direct effect
on other surrounding communities as a result of the
arrest. People who buy and sell drugs are for the most
part very mobile.
A Minnetrista couple, selling LSD in quantity in the
Minnetrista, St Bonifacious, Mound, and Excelsior areas
were arrested by the Task Force. From this the Task Force
was able to make a case on the couple's source which was
charged under a Federal Indictment (five counts). DEA was
asked to assist in this investigation due to the amount of
money that was being spent, and the mid level status of
the source. The source is now facing 12 to 15 years upon
conviction. The agent from the Task Force purchased
approximately 7,000 hits of LSD, spending approximately
$ 9,000. This case will have an impact on the amount of
LSD coming into the Task Force service area as well as the
Minneapolis area.
The Task Force conducted an investigation on a Prior Lake
resident. At the residence occupied by two brothers, a
search warrant was executed. As a result over 1/4 pound
of methamphetamine was seized along with several weapons
and approximately $6000. Due to the quantity of
methamphetamine, one brother was charged under Federal
indictment and the other two under State statute in Scott
County. Forfeiture proceedings were also started on the
residence. The person indicted was a mid level dealer for
people in the Prior Lake, Savage, Shakopee and Jordan
area. This person had been selling methamphetamine for
the last two years.
The Task Force conducted an investigation on a Watertown
resident. This person was supplying small amounts of
marijuana to a large number of people in the Watertown,
Excelsior,Mound, Minnetrista, St Bonifacious, and Navarre
area. This person was going into Minneapolis to buy
quarter pounds of marijuana and then breaking it down to
quarter ounces and selling it off. This person had been
supplying marijuana for a long time.
The Task Force conducted an investigation of a couple in
Florida sending high grade marijuana through the mail
UPS) to a Carver County couple. After the delivery was
~eceived by the couple in Carver County, the marijuana was
to be kept until one of the couple in Florida would fly up
to Minnesota, take delivery and take it to the Minneapolis
area and sell it. The couple in Florida was using the
money they made to buy land in Minnesota they were going
to move to. The couple in Florida, had a prior narcotics
arrest and conviction.
The Task Force conducted an investigation on a Rice County
resident, supposed to be a mid-level dealer of marijuana.
An agent from the Task Force was able to buy a pound of
marijuana from the source, and that buy was followed up
with a search warrant. 15.5 pounds of marijuana was
seized and the source arrested. This source was supplying
large quantities of marijuana to the Scott County and
Northfield area. The Task Force serving the Northfield
area and the Northfield Police Department assisted in the
investigation.
The Task Force conducted an investigation on two couples
living in Plymouth, supplying marijuana to people in the
Excelsior, Mound, Orono as well as the Plymouth area. An
agent from the Task Force was able to buy directly from
the two sources which was followed up with two search
warrants. As a result, both couples were arrested and
charged. Both couples advised they would buy quarter
pounds of marijuana in the cities, then sell it off in
quarter ounces to people. One couple said that they were
selling to subsidize their welfare checks.
The Task Force conducted an investigation of a two
teenagers selling LSD and marijuana in the Excelsior,
Chanhassen and Chaska area. These two teenagers one of
which was a student and a Minnetonka resident the other
was a resident of Stillwater Minnesota, living on the
streets. The two teenagers had just started up their
business in dealing drugs. Their dealing was in the
Excelsior, Chanhassen, and Chaska area due to the demand.
The one student living in Minnetonka was receiving so many
calls that he rented a pager to eliminate calls coming to
his houses. Both students said they were doing it for the
money. One student said he will do it again because it
was easy money. The arrest came when the Task Force made
a purchase of 1500 hits of LSD for $1900. Both students
were charged in Hennepin County Juvenile court.
Ail of the above cases are representative of a street
level user/dealer, which the Task Force focuses on. If it
were not for the Task Force working on these types of
people, the majority of them would go undetected and would
still operating today, selling and or using drugs.
Total Income for Task Force:
Federal grant
Match money
State buy money *
Miscellaneous
Restitution
Forfeitures allocated **
$142,500
$ 72,400
$ 15,000
$ 2,559
$ 2,729
$ 14,692
Total $ 249,880
*: Approximately $ 1,421 remained in the Buy Fund at the
end of 1991; it was transferred to the Buy Fund for 1992.
**: Required percentages were paid, along with the final
4th quarter salary reimbursement, to the South Lake
Minnetonka Public Safety Department totaling approximately
$11,960.
Copy of the final 1991 Financial Report is attached.
RUN: 28-JAN-9~
CFSO]
PRIMARY ISN~S ONLY?
ACTIVITY COOES:
NO
ALL
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09000 SPEEDING
09001 J-SPEEDING
09002 NO O/L, EXPIRED D/L
09003 J-NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L
09004 RESTRICTED D/L
09006 TEST REFUSAL
09009 J-ILLEGAL PASSING
09010 BAC OVER .10
09012 C~EN BOTTLE
09014 STOP SIGN
09015 J-STOP SIGN
09016 FAILURE TO YIELD
09018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION
09020 CARELESS/RECKLESS
09022 EXHIBITION DRIVING
09023 J-EXHIBITION ORIVING
09024 ILLEGAL/UNSAFE TURNS
09025 J-ILLEGAL/UNSAFE TURNS
09026 OVER THE CENTER LINE
09027 J-OVER THE CENTER LINE
09028 DRIVING ON PARK PROP.
09029 J-DRIVING ON PARK PROP.
09030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 ?0 80 90
140 133 55 107 114
6 5 8 16 7
1 5 6 2
2 2 2 1
3 1 2 1
? 5 3 2
1
? 4 15 10 16
2 3
15 1
1 8 36
1
2
2 7
I 1
3 I 4
PAGE
TOTAL
549
43
14
?
?
17
1
52
61
1
6
18
2
12
1
2
1
5
1
2
2
4
RU~: 2B- JAN-92
CFS03
F ISN'S ONLY?
FIVITY COOES:
NO
ALL
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09031 J-CROSSWALK VIOLATION
09032 NO PASSING
09036 OOSTRUCTED VISION
09038 ALL OTHER TRAFFIC
09040 NO SEATBELT
09041 J-NO SEATBELT
09050 ALLOWING INCC~4PETENT TO DRIVE
09100 PARKING/ALL OTHER
09140 NO PARKING/WINTER HOURS
NO TRAILER PARKING
:/DAR/DAC
09201 d-DAS/DAR/DAC
09210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED
09211 d-PLATES/NO-EXPIREO-IMPROPER
09220 NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF
09221 J-NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF
09240 CNANGE OF DOMICILE
09300 LOST ARTICLES/OTHER
09301 LOST PERSONS
09303 LOST/ ALL OTHER
09308 HOO0 ORNAMENTS
09309 FOUND/RUNAWAY
09312 FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS
INSIALLAIlON NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
1
10
1
18 17
31 12
9
8 6
1
36 17
2 4
19
1 3
2 3 5 3
18 8 41 13
1
1
35 16 47
93 25 163
1 1
16 22 6
1
34 4O 25
3
2 4 5
1
19 13 31
PAGE
TOTAL
1
1
5
15
90
1
133
324
11
58
2
152
3
1
1
5
7
2
3
1
87
RUN: 28-JAN-92
CFS03
PRIMARY ISN~S ONLY?
ACTIVITY CODES:
NO
ALL
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09313
09314
09315
09420
09430
09440
09450
09451
09452
FOUND PROPERTY
FOUND VEHICLES/IMPOUNDED
UNCLAIME DESTROYED ANIMALS
DERELICT AUTO
PERSONAL INdURY ACCIDENTS
H/R PERSONAL INJURY ACC.
PROPERTY OAMAGE ACCIDENTS
H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC.
H & R ACCIDENTS U/TICKET
09466 SNOUMOBILE COMPLAINTS
09500 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE ACC/OTHER
09561 DOG BITE
09562 CAT BITES
09563 DOG AT LARGE
09564 DOG BARKING
09565 DOG LICENSE
09566 ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS
09710 ATTEMPTED SUICIDE
09720 SUODEN DEATHS/BOOIES FOUND
09730 MED]CALS
09731 DETOX-MEOICALS
09732 CRISIS INT.-MEDICALS
09735 lDO INJURY
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/01/91 THRU 12/'~1/91
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
14 6
5 4
2 2
1
2 4
I
6 6
2 1
6
5
1
60
3
7
2
3
28
2
2
1
11 14 10
2 5 8
5 1 3
7 5
1
28 20
8 2
1
1
2
4 2
2
6
9
1
2
1 1
29
6
4
2 11
11 9
3 2
1
3
1
2
1
6
1
1
5
4
1
60
11
3
2
PAGE
TOTAL
55
24
13
1
31
2
8O
18
2
4
4
10
6
15
2
1
2O
19
7
244
31
17
RU~: 28-JAN-92
CFS03
ISN~S ONLY?
]VZTY COOES:
NO
ALL
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09?40 MENTAL CASES
09750 FIRES
09800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED
09801 DC~ESTIC/NO ASSAULT
09802 PUBLIC ASSIST
09810 LOITERING/LURKING
09811 J-LOITERING/LURKING
09900 ALL HCCP CASES
09904 OPEN DOOR/ALARMS
MISC. SERVICES BY OFFICERS
IPS
09920 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
09930 HANDGUN APPLICATION
09943 PROWLER
09944 UNWANTED GUEST
09945 SUSPICIOUS PERSON
09950 INTELLIGENCE
)9980 WARRANTS
)9990 MISC. VIOLATIONS
19992 MUTUAL AID/8100
~9993 MUTUAL AID/6500
19994 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER
9996 MUTUAL AID/NARCOTICS
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
E N F 0 R S
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
11
1
26
3
1
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
9 4 5
6 13
8
3
4
1
10
3
1
1
14
13
1
1
1
65
1
1
1 3
11 10
2 11
1 1
2 1
5
2
6~
2
6 17
3 1
2
1 1
12
3
1
7
4
34
3
1
27
1
6O
5
2
13
1
PAGE
TOTAL
2
4
42
32
2
1
1
7
3
7
2
41
6
2
27
10
203
12
67
3O
18
RU~: 28'JAN'92
CFSO~
PRIMARY ISN~S ONLY?
ACTIVITY COOES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NAI4E -- MOUND POLICE OEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
A2331
A2332
A23~5
A2~33
ASLT 2-INFLICTS BOOILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-FAM
ASLT 2-INFLICTS BOOILY HARM'KNIFE ETC-ADLT-ACQ
ASLT 2-1NFLICTS BOOILY HARM-OTH NEAP-CHLD-ACQ
ASLT 2-FEAR BOOILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-STR
A3252 ASLT 3-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-HANDS ETC-ADLT-ACQ
A5342 ASLT 5-INFLT BODILY HARM-OTH NEAP-ADLT-ACQ
A5351 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM
A5352 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-AOLT-ACQ
A5353 ASLT 5-%NFL1CTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-STR
A5354 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS NRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM
A5355 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ
A5356 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-STR
A5501 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-UNK NEAP-AOLT-FAM
A5502 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-UNK NEAP-ADLT-ACQ
A5503 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-UNK NEAP-ADLT-STR
A5551 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-HANDS ETC-ADLT-FAM
A5552 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-HANDS ETC-ADLT-ACQ
A9560 TERROR-THRT INFLT BH-EXPLOS INCEND-UNK RELAT
Bl160 BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-U-UNK NEAP-UNK ACT
Bl164 BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-N-UNK NEAP-CON THEFT
B1260 BURG 1-OCC RES NO FRC-N-UN NEAP-UNK ACT
B126~ BURG 1-OCC RES NO FRC-N-UN NEAP-CON THEFT
B128~ BURG 1-OCC RES NO FRC-U-OT NEAP-CON THEFT
1
8 5 9 2 16
I 3 2 4
1 1 1
6 3 6 3 5
6 4 3
1
1
1 2
2
1 1
1 2
PAGE
TOTAL
1
1
1
1
1
1
4O
10
3
23
13
1
2
1
3
2
4
1
1
1
5
RL:,: 28-JAN-92
CF:;03
P Y ]SN"S ONLY?
]V]TY COOES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NAHE -- ROUND POLICE DEPARTHENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
AC:
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
B1770
B1860
B3334
B336~
B3394
B3434
83494
B3694
B3764
B3894
B3895
B4330
BURG 1-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-FIREARM-UHK ACT
BURG 1-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK ~dEAP-COM THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK I, JEAP-CON THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COH THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-COH THEFT
BURG I-OCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COH THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK ~,,/EAP-CON THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK ~,~EAP-COM THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-N-UNK ~EAP-COH THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK ~/~AP-CCIN THEFT
BURG 3 UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-CON PROPTY
BURG 4-UNOCC RES FRC-O-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
B4390 BURG 4-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK I~/EAP-UNK ACT
B4430 BURG 4-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
B~?60 BURG 4-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK I~EAP-UNK ACT
B4790 BURG 4-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK I,EAP-UNK ACT
B4930 BUR6 4-AT FRC RES-D*UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
B4960 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
B~?90 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK I*/EAP-UNK ACT
C1111 FORGERY-FE-HAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PERSON
C1211 FORGERY-FE*UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-PERSON
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 60 50 60 ?0 80 90
2 3
1 1 4
1 3
1
3
1
3
2 3 3 3
1 1 2
1 1 3
1
1
2
1
1 I
1
1
1 1 1
2 1 1 1
2 1
1 1
PAGE
TOTAL
1
1
5
6
4
1
1
3
11
4
5
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
3
5
3
R~',: 28-JAN-92
CF$03
PRIMARY lSN'S ONLY?
ACTIVITY COOES:
NO
ALL
%NSTALLATZON NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
ACT
CO~E ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
C1212
C3111
C3t12
C3211
FORGERY-FE-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-BUSiNESS
FORGERY-MS-MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PERSON
FORGERY-MS-MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-BUSINESS
FORGERY-MS-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-PERSON
02240 ORUGS-SCH 1 NON NARC-SELLING-MARIJU-UNK CHAR
D3C50 DRUGS-SCH 2 NARCOTIC-POS SEL-COCAIN-UNK CHAR
D3550 DRUGS-SCH 2 NARCOTIC-POSSESS-COCAIN-OTH CHAR
D8500 DRUGS-SNALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSSESSION
E4700 ESC-GM-FLEE AN OFFICER
Fl121 ARSON 1-%NHAB-NOI~A-OT RESID-$20000 MORE
F1212 ARSON 1-UNINHB-NO ~4EA-SG RESID-$10000-$19999
F1311 ARSON 1-INNAB-FIRARM-SG RESIO-$20000 MORE
F4005 ARSON 3-MS-UNK COND-OT PROP-S299 LESS
%3060 CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
J2500 TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
J2700 TRAF-ACCIO-GM-AGGRAVATEO VIOLATION
J3500
KO005
L1057
L1075
L3073
L3841
L4071
TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
KDNAP-UNK COND%TION-UNK ACT-UNK WEAP-CHLD-ACQ
CSC 1-UNK ACT-POSAUTN'18 OLDER'F
CSC 1-UNK ACT-ACQUA%NT-16-17-F
CSC 2-UNK ACT-ACOUAINT-13-15-F
CSC 2-MULTIPLE ACTS'OTH FAM-UNDER 13-F
CSC 2 ~EAP-UNK ACT-ACGUAINT-UNOER 13-F
2
3 1 5
2 4
5
5
4
14
8
3
3
12
1
PAGE
TOTAL
1
1
2
1
1
1
3
12
6
1
1
1
1
24
26
13
39
1
1
1
1
1
Eh. 8'JAN-92
CFS03
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY?
:T]VITY COOES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- HOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FO~ SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 80 90
L5357 CSC 3-FRC OR COERCN-POSAUTH-18 OLDER-F
L5385 CSC 3-FRC OR COERCN-STRANGER-16-1?-F
L7031 CSC 4-UNK ACT-GUARDIAN-UNDER 13-F
L?045 CSC 4-UNK ACT-OTH FAM-16-17-F
L7071 C$C 4-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-F
L7072 CSC 4-UNK ACT-ACOUAINT-UNDER 13-M
LTO?? CSC 4-UNK ACT-ACOUAINT-18 OLDER-F
M3001 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER
M3003 JUVENILE-HABITUAL TRUANT
JUVENILE-USE OF TOgACCO
LIQUOR - OTHER
M5313 JUVENILE-CURFEW
M5350 RUNAWAY
M5510 HEALTH-SAFETY-FOOO-ADULTERATED
M6501 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION
M??01 FALSELY IMPERSONATING ANOTHER
M7901 ATTEMPTED COERCION
N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT
N3060 DISTURB PEACE-MS-CONCEALING IDENTITY
N3070 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE
N3080 DISTURB PEACE-MS-INTERFERE WITH PRIVACY
N3190 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING CONMUNICATIONS
03772 OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE LETTER ETC-ADULT
12
1 2
8
1
4 4
12
11
2O
1
1
1
5 3
10 3
3 6
4
1
4
10
6
8
9
1
3
41
PAGE
TOTAL
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
16
8
1
27
18
27
1
8
1
1
7
4
3
94
RU 8-JAN-~
CFS03
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY?
ACTZV[TY CODES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
03881
O3882
Pl110
Pl112
Pl114
Pl130
P2110
P2120
OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-MINOR
OBSENITY-NS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT
PROP DANAGE-FE-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
PROP OANAGE-FE-PRIVATE-RISK BODILY HARH-DEATH
PROP DANAGE-FE-PRIVATE-REOUCE VALU $300 MORE
PROP DANAGE-FE-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT
PROP DANAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
PROP OANAGE-GM-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT
P2130 PROP DANAGE-GM-BUSINESS-UN[ INTENT
P3110 PROP DANAr. I:-MS-PR1VATE-UNK INTENT
P3120 PROP DANAGE-MS-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT
P3130 PROP OANAGE-MS-BUS1NESS-UNK INTENT
P3310
P3600
Q1221
01222
Q1223
Q1292
R2113
R3136
T0150
TO~2
T1021
TRESPASS-NS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
LITTER-UNLAWFUL DEPOSIT OF GARBAGE-MS
STLN PROP-FE-POSSESS-VEHICLE-OVER 2500
STLN PROP-FE-POSSESS-VEHICLE-lO00-2500
STLN PRO~-FE-POSSESS-VEH1CLE-301-999
STLN PROI~-FE-POSSESS-OTHER PROP-$1000-$2500
ROBB-AGG-NO BH-NIGHWAY-POS FIRARM-AOULT-STR
ROBB-SIMPLE-HIGHWAY-KNIFE CUT-CHILD-STR
THEFT-UNK LVL VAL-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-UNK PROP
THEFT-LINK LVL VAL-FRM OTHER'SERVICES
THEFT-NC~E $2500-FE-FRM BUILO%NG-MONEY
25
1
1
1
1 1
5 31 6 41
1 2 1
1 2 1
I 1 2
5
1 2
2 1
1
1
1
PAGE
TOTAL
1
7
2
1
1
1
2
2
108
5
5
3
1'
2
1
1
1
1
lSN~S ONLY?
ClX)ES:
NO
ALL
IHST~A~IOH H~E -- ~OUHD POLICE DEPART~EHT
EN FOR S
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
T1029
Tl169
T2021
T2025
THEFT-HORE $2500-FE-FRH BUILDING-OTH PROP
THEFT-HORE $2500-FE-FRH WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRH BUILDING-HONEY
THEFT-251-2500-FE-FRH BUILDING-FIREARHS
T2029 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRH BU[LDING-OTH PROP
T2031 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM COIN HACHINE-HONEY
T2059 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRH YARDS-OTH PROP
T2061
T2151
T3159
T4020
T4021
T4029
T4049
T4059
T4061
T4069
T4099
T4151
T4155
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM MAIL-MONEY
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-MONEY
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-251-2500-FE-FRM OTHER-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILD[NG-UNK PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-MONEY
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILD[NG-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM SHIPMENT-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MAIL-MONEY
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MAIL-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-MONEY
THEFT-250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-FIREARMS
2 2
15
1
1
1 3
2 3 4
1
PAGE
TOTAL
1
1
6
1
6
1
5
1
2
14
15
1
1
2
8
7
1
22
2
2
4
1
10
/.38
R~: 28'JAN'92
CF~03
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY?
ACTIVITY COOES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 80 90
T,~159
T~69
189
T,~I
03~
062
283
497
U1503
U1507
U1520
U3016
U3017
U3018
U3026
~028
U3286
U3288
L1~,97
U3498
U3503
U3507
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS'MS'FRM FISHHOUSE-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM OTHER-MONEY
FRAUD-UNK LVL'OTHER ACT-UNK LOSS
THEFT-FE-BY CREDIT CARD-$301-$500
THEFT-FE-BY SWINDLE OR TRICK-$2501-$19999
THEFT-FE-SHOPLIFTING-501-2500
THEFT-FE-B1CYCLE-NO MOTOR-$201-$500
THEFT-FE-BOAT-NO MOTOR-501-2500
THEFT-FE-BOAT-NO MOTOR-$201-$500
FRAUD-FE-DIVERT CORP PROP-UNK LOSS
THEFT-MS-BY CHECK-S250 LESS
THEFT-MS-BY CHECK - $201-$500
THEFT-MS-BY CHECK - $200 OR LESS
THEFT-MS-ISSUE ~ORTHLES CHECK-S250 LESS
THEFT-MS-ISSUE WORTHLES CHECK - $200 OR LESS
THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-S250 LESS
THEFT-MIS-SHOPLIFTING - $200 OR LESS
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR - $201-$500
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-S200 OR LESS
THEFT-MS-BOAT-NO MOTOR-501-2500
THEFT-MS-BOAT-NO MOTOR - $201'$500
7 12 13 5 15
2 2 7 3 6
1 7 3 5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1 2
1 1 1 17
1
1 3 1
1
5 7
1
3 3 4 3 2
1
1
PAGE
TOTAL
52
2O
16
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
2O
1
5
1
12
1
15
1
1
11
RUm: 28- JAN-92
CF$05
~Y ISN~S ONLY?
tTIVITY CODES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- NOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
EN FORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
U3508 THEFT-NS-BOAT-NO MOTOR- $200 OR LESS
V1021 VEH THEFT-FE-OVER $2500-AUTO
V1022 VEH THEFT-FE-OVER $2500-TRUCK-BUS
V1024 VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-SNOWMOBILE
V1029 VEN THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-BOAT-SLF PROPEL MTRIZ
V2020 VEH THEFT-FE-251-2500-OTHER VEH-MOTORIZED
V2021 VEH THEFT-FE-$251-$2500-AUTO
V202& VEH THEFT-FE-251-2500-SNO~qOBILE
W3180 ~APONS-NS-DISCHARGE-FIREWORKS-NO CHAR
~APONS-MS-USES-OTHER TYPE-NO CHAR
WEAPONS-MS-POSSESS-OTHER TYPE-UNLAW PURPOS
~,F~990 t,~APONS-MS-OTHER ACT-OTHER TYPE-NO CHAR
~,~999 ~,~APONS-MS-OTHER ACT-OTHER TYPE-UNLAW PURPOS
X6111 TRAFF-DU]-PERN]T PERSON-LIQUOR-WATERCRAFT
Y2230 CRIM AGNST GOVN-GM-ESCAPE TAX-MTR VEH
1 2
4 2
1 3
1 5
1 1 1
1
PAGE
TOTAL
1
6
2
6
4
1
I
6
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
12
REPORT TOTALS:
657 471 933 719 1016 28 32 69 24
3949
RUN: ~9-JAN-9~ INSTALLATION NAME -- HOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 1
OFF01 t *, t * * *
PRIMARY ISN~S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRIO: ALL 01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
A2331 1
ASLT 2-INFLICTS BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-FAM
A2332 1
ASLT 2-INFLICTS BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-ACG
A2345 1
ASLT 2-INFLICTS BOOILY HARM-OTH WEAP-CHLD-ACQ
A2433 1
ASLT 2-FEAR BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-STR
A3252 1
ASLT 3-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-HANDS ETC-ADLT-ACQ
A5342 1
ASLT 5-INFLT BODILY HARM-OTH ~AP-AOLT-ACQ
A5351 38
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM
A5352 10
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-NANDS-ADLT-ACQ
A5353 3
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-STR
A5354 23
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM
A5355 13
ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ
A5356 1
ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-STR
A5501 2
ASLT 5-THRT BOOILY HARM-UNK WEAP-ADLT-FAM
A5502 1
ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-UNK ~EAP-ADLT-ACQ
A5503 3
ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-UNK 14EAP-ADLT-STR
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 I 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
3 35 3 23 1 8 32 91.
1 9 0 2 I 6 9 100.0
0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0
? 16 5 1 0 10 11 68.7
0 13 1 0 6 6 12 92.3
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 2 1 1 0 0 1 50.0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0
R~: 29-dM-92 INSTALLATJ~ NAHE -- NOUgD POLICE DEPARTHENT PAGE 2
OFF01 , , , , , ,
P~CY ISM'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
SITION CODES: ALL
TIVITY (CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRIO: ALL 01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING AOULT JUVENILE EXCEPT%ON CLEARED CLEARED
A5551 2
ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM'HANDS ETC'AOLT-FAN
A5552
ASLT 5'THRT BODILY HARM'HANDS ETC'ADLT'ACQ
A9560 1
TERROR-THRT INFLT BH-EXPLOS INCEND-UNK RELAT
Bl160
' BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
0 2 1 0 0 1 1 50.0
Bl164 4
BURG I-OCC RES FRC-H-UNK WiEAP-COM THEFT
81260 1
BURG I-OCC RES NO FRC-N-UN ~EAP-UNK ACT
5
-OCC RES NO FRC-N-UN WIEAP-COM THEFT
B128~ 1
BURG 1-OCC RES NO FRC-U-OT WEAP-COM THEFT
B1770 1
BURG I'UNOCC NRES FRC-U'FIREARM-UNK ACT
B1860 1
BURG 1-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-N-UNK UEAP-UNK ACT
B3334 5
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK I~EAP-COM THEFT
B336~ 6
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK WI~AP-CC~ THEFT
83394 4
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
83434 1
BUR6 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK WEAP-CO~4 THEFT
B3494 3
BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-CC]t4 THEFT
1 3 0 0 0 3 3 100.0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 4 3 0 0 1 1 25.0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 5 5 0 0 0 0 .0
0 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 5 2 2 0 1 3 60.0
0 6 4 0 1 1 2 33.3
0 4 3 0 0 1 1 25.0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 3 2 0 1 0 1 33.3
RUk. 29-JAN-92 INSTALLATION NAHE -- NOUND POLICE DEPARTNENT PAGE
OFF01 * * * * * *
PRINARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
B3694 1
BURG 1-OCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK JWEAP-CON THEFT
B376~ 3
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-CON THEFT
B3794 9
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-CON THEFT
B3864 4
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-N-UNK ~EAP-CON THEFT
83894 5
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK IdEAP-CON THEFT
B3895 1
BURG 3 UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK J~EAP-CON PROPTY
84330 1
BURG 4-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK I,/EAP-UNK ACT
84390 2
BURG 4-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
B~30 1
BURG 4-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
B4760 2
BURG 4-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
B4790 1
BURG 4-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK UEAP-UNK ACT
B4930
BURG 4'AT FRC RES-D'UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
B4960
BURG 4-AT FRC RES-N-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0
8499O 5
BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
Cl111 3
FC~GERY-FE-NAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PERSON
0 9 8 0 0 1 1 11.1
0 4 4 0 0 0 0 .0
0 5 4 I 0 0 I 20.0
0 1 I 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .~
0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
3 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 33.3
0 5 5 0 0 0 0 .0
0 3 0 1 1 1 3 100.0
RU~,. ~'9-JAN-92 INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 4
OFF01
P~cTY ISN~S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
ITION COOES: ALL
IVITY COOES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
C1211 2
FORGERY-FE-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-PERSON
C1212 1
FORGERY-FE-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-BUSINESS
C3111 1
FORGERY-MS-MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PERSON
C3112 2
FORGERY-MS-MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-BUSINESS
C3211 1
FORGERY-MS-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-PERSON
D2240 1
DRUGS-SCH 1 NON NARC-SELLING-MARIJU-UNK CHAR
0 2 0 I 0 1 2 100.0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 2 0 0 I 1 2 100.0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
2 NARCOTIC-POS SEL-COCAIN-UNK CHAR
03550 3
DRUGS-SCH 2 NARCOTIC-POSSESS-COCAIN-OTH CHAR
D8500 12
DRUGS-SHALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSSESSION
1 2 0 2 0 0 2 100.0
0 12 0 12 0 0 12 100.0
E4700 6 0 6 1 4 1 0 5 83.3
ESC-ON-FLEE AN OFFICER
Fl121 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
ARSON 1-INHAB-NO WEA-OT RESID-$20000 MORE
F1212 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
AR~ 1-UNINHB-NO WEA-SG RESID*$10000-$1~
F1311 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
ARSON 1-INHAB-FIURM-SG RESID-$20000 MORE
F4005 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 ,0
ARSON 3-NS-UNK COND-OT PROP-$2~ LESS
I3060 24 4 20 4 0 0 16 16 80.0
CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
R~; :9-JAN-92 INSTALLATION NANE -- NOUND POLICE DEPARTHENT PAGE
OFF01 * * * * * *
PRIHARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
DISPOSITION COl)ES: ALL
ACTIVITY COl)ES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEAREO CLEARED
J2500 26
TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF L%QUOR
0 26 0 26 0 0 26 100.0
d2rO0 13 0 13 0 13 0 0 13 100.0
TRAF-ACCID-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION
J3500 39
TRAFoACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LH~JOR
KO005 1
K'DNAP-UNK CONDITIC)N-UNK ACT-UNK t~EAP-CHLO-ACG
0 39 0 38 1 0 39 100.0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
L1057 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
CSC 1-UNK ACT-POS AUTH-18 OLDER-F
L1075 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
CSC 1-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-16o1?-F
L307'3 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1
CSC 2-UNK ACT-ACOUAINT-13-15-F
L3841 1
CSC Z-MULTIPLE ACTSoOTH FAM-UNDER 13'F
100.
L4071 2
CSC 2 b'EAP-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-F
L5357 1
CSC 3-FRC OR COERCN-POS AUTH-18 OLDER-F
L5385
CSC 3-FRC OR COERCN-STRANGER-16-1?-F
0 I 0 I 0 0 1 100.0
0 2 0 0 2 0 2 100.0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
L7031 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
CSC 4-UNK ACT-GUARDIAN-UNDER 13-F
L7045 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
CSC 4-UNK ACT-OTH FAM-16-17-F
L7071 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
CSC 4-UNK ACT-ACOUAINT-UNDER 13-F
L7072 3 0 3 0 0 1 2 3 100.0
CSC 6-UNK ACT-ACqUAINT-UNDER 13-M
RU~; :9-JAN-92
OFF01
I#STALLATiON NANE -- NOUI~ POLICE DEPARTNENT
PAGE 6
' ISN~S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
;ITION CDDES: ALL
IVITY COOES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ...............
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL ' '/
.... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
L7077 I 0 1 0 0 0 1
CSC 4-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-18 OLDER-F 1 100.0
I~001 16 0 16 0 0 15
JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER 1 16 100.0
I,~3003 8 0 8 0 0 ?
JUVENILE-HABITUAL TRUANT 1 8 100.0
M300S 1 0 1 0 0 1
JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO 0 1 100.0
1~199 27 0 27 0 25
LIQUOR - OTHER 2 0 27 100.0
M5313 18 0 18 0 0 18
JUVENILE-CURFEW
0 18 100.0
M5510
HEALTH-SAFETY- FOOO-ADULTERATED
N6501
DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION
FALSELY IMPERSONATING ANOTHER
M7'901 1
ATTEMPTED COERCION
N3030 7
DISTURB PEACE'MS'DISO~DERLY CONDUCT
N3060 4
DISTURB PEACE-MS-CONCEALING IDENTITY
N3OZO 2
DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE
N3080 3
31STURB PEACE-MS-INTERFERE gITH PRIVACY
27 0
27 2 0 16 9
1 0 1
8 0
0 1
0 2
1 0
1 0 0 0
8 0 8 0 0
1 0 1 0 0
25 92.5
0 .0
8 100.0
0 0 0 1 I 100.0
7 0 5 1 1 7 100.0
4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0
0 2 0 0 2 100.0
3 2 1 0 0 1 33.3
RUN: ~9- JAN-92
INSTALLATION NAME -- NOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE ?
OFF01 * * * * * *
PRIHARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
DISPOSITION C~OES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
N3190 ~5
DISTURB PEACE-NS-HARRASSING ~NICATIONS
03881
O~SENITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-MINOR
1 94 72 1 3 18 22 23.4
03882
OBSENITY-NS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
P1110
PROP DAMAGE-FE-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
7 0 7 5
0 1 1 2 28.5
2 0 2 1 0 0 I I 50.0
Pl112 1
PROP DAMAGE-FE-PR[VATE-RISK BOOILY HARM-DEATH
Pl114 1
PROP DAMAGE-FE-PRIVATE°REDUCE VALU $300 MORE
Pl130 1
PROP DAHAGE-FE-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT
0 1 I 0 0 0 0 .0
P2110
PROP OAMAGE-GM-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
P2120
PROP DAHAGE-GM-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT
0 I 0 0 0 1 1 100.
P2130
PROP DAHAGE-GM-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT
0 4 4 0 0 0 0 .0
P3110
PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0
P3120
PROP DAMAGE-MS-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT
2 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 50.0
P3130
PROP DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT
107 0 107 84 5 1 17 23 21.4
P3310
TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
4 0 4 3 0 0 1 1 25.0
4 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 .0
4 0 4 2 0 0 2 2 50.0
5 0 5 1 0 0 4 4 80.0
p~600
LITTER-UNLAI4FUL DEPOSIT OF GARBAGE-MS
I~U~. -~9-JAN-92 INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 8
OFF01 * * * * * *
T[V[TY CO)ES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSIT[ON
GRID: ALL 01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
G1221 4
STLN PROP-FE-POSSESS-VEHICLE-OVER 2500
01222 3
STLN PROP- FE-POSSESS-VEH I CLE- 1000- 2500
01223 1
STLN PROP- FE-POSSESS-VENICLE-301-999
Q1292 2
STLN PROP*FE*POSSESS-OTHER PROP-$1000-$2500
R2113 1
ROSB-AG6oNO BH-NIGHWAYoPOS FIRARMoADULToSTR
R3136 1
RORB- SIMPLE- H I GHWAY-KN I FE CUT-CHI LD-STR
1
LVL VAL-FRN MOTOR VEHICLE-UNK PROP
T0992 1
THEFT-UNX LVL VAL-FRM OTHER-SERVICES
T1021 1
THEFT-MORE $2500-FE-FRN BUILDING-MONEY
T1029 1
THEFT-MORE $2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP
T 1169 1
THEFT-MORE $2500-FE-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
T2021 6
T HE F T- $251 - $2500- FE- FRN BU [ LD I NG- MONEY
T2025 1
THE F T- 251 - 2500- FE- FRM BUILD 1NG- F I REARMS
T2029 6
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTN PROP
T2031 1
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM COIN MACHINE-MONEY
0 4 0 2 2 0 4 100.0
0 3 0 2 0 1 3 100.0
0 1 0 I 0 0 I 100.0
0 2 0 1 1 0 2 100.0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 IO0.O
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
I 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
2 4 2 1 0 1 2 50.0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 6 4 1 0 1 2 33.3
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
RU~,. /9- JAN-92
OFF01
INSTALLATION IIANE -- NOUNO POLICE DEPARTNENT
PAGE 9
PRIMARY ISN~S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENOING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
T2059 5 0 5 4 0
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP
T2061 I 0 1 1 O
THEFT-S251 -$2500- FE- FRN NAIL-HONEY
T2151 2 0 2 2 0
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-MONEY
T2159 13 0 13 10 3
THEFT-$251-$2500- FE- FRM MOTOR VEH I CLE-OTH PROP
T2169 15 1 1/~ 14 0
T#EFT-$251 -$2500- FE- FRN WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
T2999 1 0 1 1 0
THEFT-251-2500-FE-FRN OTHER-OTH PROP
T3159 I 0 1 1 0
THEFT-S250 LESS-FE-FRN MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
T4020 2 0 2 1 0
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-UNK PROP
T4021 8 1 7 4 0
THEFT-S250 LESS-HS-FRH BUILDING-MONEY
T4029 7 1 6 4 0
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRH BUILD]NG-OTH PROP
T40~9 1 0 1 1 0
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM SHIPHENT-OTH PROP
T4059 22 2 20 18 1
THEFT-$250 LESS-NS-FRN YAROS-OTH PROP
T4061 2 0 2 1 0
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MAIL-MONEY
T4069 1 0 1 1 0
THEFT-S250 LESS-NS-FRM MAIL-OTH PROP
T4099 3 0 3 1 0
THEFT-$250 LESS-MS-FRM SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP
0 I 1 20.0
0 0 0 .0
0 0 0 .0
0 0 3 23.0
0 0 0 .0
0 0 0 .0
0 0 0
0 1 1 50.0
1 2 3 ~,2.8
0 2 2 33.3
0 0 0 .0
1 0 2 IO.O
1 0 1 50.0
0 0 0 .0
0 2 2 66.6
RU~. ~9-JAN-92
OFF01
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE
10
Y ISN~S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
SlTION COOES: ALL
rIVITY COOES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
T4151
THEFT-$250 LESS'MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-MONEY
1 3 2 1 0 0 1 33.3
T4155 1
THEFT-250 LESS-NS-FRN MOTOR VEHICLE-FIREARMS
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
T4159 52
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
0 52 49 1 0 2 3 5.7
T4169 20
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
0 20 20 0 0 0 0 .0
T4189 16
THEFT-$250 LESS-MS-FRM FISHHOUSE-OTH PROP
0 16 16 0 0 0 0 .0
T4991 I 1 0 0 0 0 0
THEFT-$250 LESS-MS- FRM OTHER-MONEY 0 . 0
LVL-OTHER ACT-UNK LOSS
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
U1034 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
THEFT-FE-BY CREDIT CARD-$301-S500 1 100.0
U1062 1
THEFT-FE-BY SWINDLE OR TRICK-$2501-$19999
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
U1283 I 0 I 1 0 0
THEFT'FE-SHOPLIFTING-501-2500 0 0 .0
U1497 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
THEFT-FE-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-$201-$500 0 .0
U1503 1 0 1 1 0 0
THEFT-FE-BOAT-NO MOTOR-501-2500 0 0 .0
U1507 1 0 1 1 0 0
THEFT-FE-BOAT-NO MOTOR-$201-$500 0 0 .0
J1520 1 0 1 0 I 0 0
FRAUD-FE-DIVERT CORP PROP-UNK LOSS 1 100.0
J3016 2 0 2 0 0 0
tHEFT-MS-BY CHECK-S250 LESS 2 2 100.0
RU~- ~9-aAN-92
INSTALLATIOM NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE 11
OFF01 * * * * * *
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
OISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITYCODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
OESCRIPTiON REPORTEO UNFOUNOED OFFENSES PENDING AOULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
U3017
THEFT'NS'BY CHECK - $201-$500
U3018 20
THEFT-MS-BY CHECK - $200 OR LESS
U3026 1
THEFT-NS-ISSUE ~dORTHLES CHECK-S250 LESS
U3028 5
THEFT-NS-ISSUE JdORTHLES CHECK ' $200 OR LESS
U3286 1
THEFT-NS-SHOPLIFTING-S250 LESS
U3288 11
THEFT-HIS-SHOPLIFTING - $200 OR LESS
U3497 1
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR - $201-$500
U3498 15
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-S200 OR LESS
U3503 1
THEFT-NS-BOaT-NO MOTOR-S01-2500
U3507 1
THEFT-NS-BOAT-NO MOTOR - $201-$500
U3508 1
THEFT-NS-BOAT-NO MOTOR- $200 OR LESS
V1021 6
VEH THEFT-FE-OVER $2500-AUTO
V1022 2
VEH THEFT-FE-OVER $2500-TRUCK-BUS
V1024 6
VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-SNOIdI40BILE
V1029 4
VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-BOAT-SLF PROPEL MTRIZ
3 0 3 0 I 0 2 3 100.0
0 20 4 4 0 12 16 80.0
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 5 0 2 I 2 5 100.0
0 1 0 0 1 0 I 100.0
0 11 1 5 4 1 10 90.9
0 1 1 0 0 0 0
0 15 13 0 0 2 2 13.3
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 6 5 0 0 1 I 16.6
1 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 6 4 2 0 0 2 33.3
0 ~, 4 0 0 0 0 .0
RUk: ~'9'JAN'92 INSTALLATION NANE -- NOUND POLICE DEPARTHENT PAGE 12
OFF01
Y I,',',',',',',',','~S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
~ITION COOES: ALL
TIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 01/01/91 THRU 12/$1/91
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTEO UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING AOULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
............................................................................................ L .......................................
V2020 1
VEH THEFT-FE-251-2SOO-OTHER VE#-MOTC~IZED
V2021 1
VEH THEFT- FE-$251-$2500-AUTO
V2024 6
VEH THEFT- FE- 251-2500- SNOb'NOB I LE
I,~3180 3
UEAPONS-MS-D 1SCHARGE- F 1REIdORKS-NO CHAR
~43190 1
'dEAPONS-NS-USES-OTHER TYPE-NO CHAR
~APOHS-HS-POSSESS-OTNER TYPE-UNLAW PURPOS
1
3-OTHER ACT-OTHER TYPE-NO CHAR
gEAPONS-MS-OTNER ACT-OTHER TYPE-UNLN,/ PURPOS
X6111 1
TRAFF-DUI-PERNIT PERSON- L I GUOR- ~ATERCRAF T
Y2230 2
CRIH AGNST GOVN-ON-ESCAPE TAX-HTR VEH
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 I 0 0 0 I 1 100.0
1 5 4 0 1 0 1 20.0
0 3 0 0 1 2 3 100.0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 2 0 2 0 0 2 100.0
REPORT TOTALS - 1,013
35 978 483 230 99 166 495 50.6
RUN: 29- JAN*92
PRO03
PROP PROP
TYPE DESC
INCIDENT
NUHBER
SEQ TYPE
NO NO
INSTALLATION ~ *- ~ POLICE DEPARTNENT
ENFORS
PR~RTY - ST~EN/RE~RED
01/01/91 TH~ 12~1/91
DATE ST~EN DATE
ST~EN VAL~ RE~RED
RECOVERED
VALUE
PAGE
AUTO/TK
AUTO/TK
AUTO/TK
AUTO/TK
AUTO/TK
AUTO/TK
AUTO/TK
AUTO/TK
AUTO/TK
AUTO/TK
AUTO/TK
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
BIKE
CAHERA
CLOTH
CLOTH
CLOTH
CLOTH
CLOTH
CLOTH
VEHICL
BICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
81CYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
8ICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
BICYCL
CAHERA
91001047
91001952
91001057
88002510
9100007~
91000079
91000128
91000161
91000~0
910003?7
910006?.0
91001401
91002060
91001093
91000278
9100077'6
91000668
9100075~
91000755
91000?76
910007~ff)
91000?98
91000913
91000917
910009?7
91000997
91001100
91001156
91001160
91001326
91001354
91001473
91001521
91001565
91001582
91OO1789
91001166
91000778
91000151
910002~
91000368
91000622
9100064,2
91000691
07/13/91
11/25/91 S15,000
07/12/91 $5
12/12/91
01/18/91 $4,000 02/25/91
01/18/91 $2,000 01/19/91
01/28/91 $400 02/27/91
02/05/91 $18,000 02/12/91
03/09/91 $10,000 03/09/91
03/16/91 03/16/91
05/05/91 $1/,,000 05/06/91
08/28/91 $3,200 08/30/91
12/17/91 $~ ,000 12/27/91
07/17/91 $8,000 07/17/91
02/25/91 $150
06/01/91 $30
05/14/91 $120
05/28/91 S100 05/29/91
05/28/91 $600
06/01/91 $30
06/03/91 S100 06/12/91
06/04/91 $75
06/20/91 $50
06/21/91 $5 06/21/91
07/01/91 $250 07/05/91
07/03/91 $~00
07/17/91
07/24/91 S210
07/24/91 S67 07/26/91
08/16/91 $100
08/20/91 S211 08/22/91
09/09/91 $150
09/16/91 $/,25
09/25/91 $100
09/27/91
10/28/91 S150
07/25/91 $75 07/30/91
06/01/9,1 $800
02/02/9i S179
02/17/91 ',
03/1/,/91 $310 ,/
05/05/91 $180
05/09/91 $200
05/18/91 $1/.0
$4,500
$4,000
$2,000
~00
$18,000
$10,000
$5,000
$14,000
$3,200
$4,000
$8,000
$100
$100
$5
$250
$~7
$211
$75
PR003
PROP PROP INCIDE#T SEQ TYPE
TYPE DESC NCI48ER NO NO
CLOTH
CLOTH
CLOTH
CLOTH
CLOTH
CLOTH
CLOTH
CONSUM
CO~SUM
CONS~4
CONSC~I
CONSUN
CONSUN
CONSUN
CONSUN
CONSUN
CONSUN
CONSUN
CONSUN
COnSUl4
CONSUN
GUNS
GUNS
GUNS
GUNS
GUNS
GUNS
GUNS
APPLNC
APPLHC
APPLHC
PISTOL
SHOTGU
91000746 1 2
91OO0821 1 1
910O0997 I 2
91001112 1 2
91001160 1 3
91001591 1 1
91001929 I 2
91000114 1 1
91000182 1 1
91000261 1 1
91000383 1 1
91000611 1 1
91000624 1 2
91000628 1 6
91000661 1 1
91000922 1 1
91000926 1 1
9100097'5 1 2
910O0997 1 3
9100107'8 1 2
91001112 1
91001131 1 1
91001231 1 1
91001335 1 1
91001390 1 1
91001398 1 1
91001464 1 1
91001555 1 1
91001687 1 1
91001751 1 1
910018?8 1 1
91001882 1 1
91001929 1 3
91002059 1 1
880019~1 1 1
91000151 1 1
91000256 1 1
91000628 I 4
91001128
91000453 I 1
91000949 1 1
9100O418 1 3
91000835 1 7
91001233 I I
I NSTALLA T I Otl NAME -o ~OUtlD POLICE DEPAR TfftEffT
ENFORS
PROPERTY - STOLEN/RECOVERED
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
DATE STOLEN DATE RECOVERED
STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED VALUE
05/26/91 $30
06/08/91 $23
07/03/91 $420
07/12/91 $97
07/24/91 $89
09/27/91 $8O
11/22/91 $45
01/24/91 $16
02/07/91 $5 02/07/91
02/23/91 $1 02/23/91
03/16/91 S17 03/21/91
05/04/91 $12 05/04/91
05/05/91 $4
05/08/91 $12
05/14/91 $12
06/21/91 $19
06/21/91 $22
06/30/91 $3
07/03/91 $888
07/15/91 $15
07/12/91 $80
07/20/91
08/05/91 $15
08/17/91 $1 08/17/91
08/26/91 $7 08/26/91
08/27/91 $11
09/02/91 $15
09/21/91 $70
10/15/91 $5 10/15/91
10/23/91 $2 10/23/91
11/13/91 $1,065
11/14/91 $6 11/14/91
11/22/91 $15
12/17/91 $1 12/17/91
12/15/91
02/02/91 $1,200
02/22/91 $300
05/08/91 $250
07/22/9i $400 07/22/91
04/02/91'
$100 04/03/91
06/26/91 $145
03/25/91 $2?5
06/10/91 $100
08/05/91 $350 12/31/91
PAGE 2
$5
Sl
$17
$12
$1
$7
$5
S2
$6
$1
$450
$40O
$100
$350
PROP PROP
TYPE DE$C
INSTALLATION NANE -- NDUND POLICE DEPARTNENT
ENFORS
PROPERTY - STOLEN/RECOVERED
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
[NC[DENT SEQ TYPE DATE STOLEN DATE RECOVERED
NUMBER NO NO STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED VALUE
PAGE 3
APPLNC
SIlO/AW
SIIOIATV
SIlO/AW
SNO/ATV
SIiO/AI'V
SIlO/AW
SNO/ATV
SIlO/AW
~O/ATV
SNO/ATV
SNO/ATV
S~O/A'rV
JEUELRY
JEi,~LRY
JEI,,~LRY
JB, IELRY
JEldELRY
JEUELRY
JEldELRY
JEI,~LRY
JEI,~LRY
JEUELRY
JEI,~LRY
OFF EQP
OFF EOP
PER ACC
PER ACC
PER ACC
PER ACC
PER ACC
PER ACC
PER ACC
PER ACC
R,~[O
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
SNOUNO
SNOk140
SNOUNO
SNOUNO
TRUNPE
91001915
91000378
910005/,5
91000566
91001986
91002089
91002105
91002120
91000016
91000043
91000048
91000310
910018~0
910001/*7
91000278
91000~8
91000631
91000963
911)01112
91CO1~92
91CO1368
910016~3
91001667
91001707
91001~47
9100071/*
91000151
91000802
91000673
91000692
91000??7
91000867
91000875
91000953
910o17~
91001905
91oooo~8
91000151
910o0151
91000208
91o002??
9100o2?8
91oo0418
91oo0418
11/20191
12103191
12123191
12127/91
12/29/91
01/07/91
01/10/91
01/04/91
03/03/91
11/05/91
01/25/91
02/25/91
03/1/,/91
05/08/91
06/22/91
07/12/91
08/11/91
08/?.2/91
09/03/91
09/04/91
10/18/91
09/04/91
05/22/91
02/02/91
06/05/91
05/15/91
05/18/91
06/01/91
06/15/91
06/13/91
06/26/91
10/21/91
11/18/91
01/07/91
02/02/9i,
02/02/91'.
02/03/91 '.
02/25/91
02/25/91
03125191
03/25/91
$35
03/16/91 ~,500
04/19/91 $3,500
04/19/91 $1,900
$1,000 12/04/91 $1,000
$3,900
S3,700 12/27/91 $3,700
$2,300 12/29/91 S2,300
Sl,0CO 05/09/91 Sl,000
$300
S~,O00
S~,6OO
S950 11/05/91 S950
S150
$1,350
S250
S5,000
SO 09/23/91 SlO,O00
$120
S259
$850
$1,000
$250
S6,200
$225
S~03 08/20/91
Sl,200
S610
$30
$50
$16O
S131 06/15/91 S131
$20 06/26/90 $20
$395
S320
$819
$2O
$130
$160
$6~0
$300
R~: 29' JAN'92
PRO03
PROP PROP
TYPE DE$C
RADIO
RADIO
IL~DIO
RADIO
IL~DIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO RADARD
RAD I 0 SCAN NE
PAD I 0 SPERKE
RAD I 0 STEREO
RAD I 0 STEREO
INCIDENT
NLINBER
SEQ TYPE
NO NO
9100G~51 1 1
91000~63 I 1
91OOO512 1 1
91000622 1 3
91000628 1 1
91000631 1 2
910OO693 1 1
9100083~ 1 1
910008.:35 1 1
91000835 I 2
91000835 I 5
91000886 1 1
91000911 1 1
91001035 1
91001035 1 5
910010~0 1 1
91001078 I 1
91001112 1 1
91001120 1 1
910011/.1 1 3
91001160 1 1
910011?7 1 1
91001216 1 2
91001251 1 1
91001266 I 1
91001~92 1 1
9100129~ 1 1
91001306 1 1
910014J.3 1 1
91001~.66 1 1
91001472 1 2
91001/.97 1 1
9100175~ 1 1
91001?97 1 1
91001899 1 1
91001903 1
91001905 1 3
91001915 1 1
91001922 1
91000650 1 1
91000?78 1 3
91000~.57 1 1
910006?./. 1 1
910007/.1 1 1
INSTALLATION NN4E -- NOUI~ 'POLIcE DEPARTI4ENT
ENFORS
PROPERTY - STOLEN/RECOVERED
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
DATE STOLEN DATE RECOVERED
STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED VALUE
PAGE
0/,/01/91 $1,025
0~/01/91 $315
0~/12/91 $98 0~/12/91
05/05/91 $300
05/08/91 $655
05/08/91 $40
05/18/91 $588
06/09/91 $250
06/10/91
06/10/91 $200
06/10/91 $300
06/16/91 $250
06/14/91 $100
07/08/91 $70
07/08/91 $120
07/09/91 $400
07/15/91 $310
07/12/91 $700
07/14/91 $200
07/22/91 $10
07/24/91 $1,000
07/26/91 $150
08/02/91 $75
07/29/91 $500
08/05/91 S70
08/11/91 $200
08/03/91 $60
08/13/91 S200
09/03/91 $530
09/06/91 $350 09/07/91
08/30/91 $300
09/13/91 $1,015
10/16/91 $500
10/30/91 $5
11/18/91 ~66
11/18/91 $50
11/18/91 $80
11/20/91 $129
11/21/9i' $200 12/31/91
05/10/91 ' $1~}
06/01/91 ~00
0~/02/91 $50
05/05/91
05/26/91 $200
$98
$35O
$200
RUN:
PRO03
PROP PROP
TYPE DESC
INSTALLATION lU~ -- NOUND POLICE DEPARTHENT
ENFORS
PROPERTY -STIX. EN/RECOVERED
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
INCIDENT SEQ TYPE DATE STOLEN DATE RECOVERED
NUMBER NO NO STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED VALUE
PAGE 5
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
RADIO
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EOP
SPT EQP
SPT EOP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EOP
SPT EQP
SPT EOP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EOP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EOP
SPT EQP
STEREO
STEREO
STEREO
TELEVI
TELEV!
TELEV!
TELEV!
91000835
9100097'9
91OO192]
91000628
91000778
91000802
91000961
91000008
91000104,
91000121
91000131
91000132
91000133
910001~4~
91O0O140
91000147
91000208
91000217
91OO0254
910OO31~
91000371
91000627
91000628
91OO06~0
91000642
91000642
91000806
91000855
91OO08~5
91000835
91OO08~5
91000835
91 OOO86O
91000896
91~2
91000925
91000945
91000963
91000979
91OO097~
91001030
91001035
91001035
91OO1036
1 10 06/10/91
1 2 06/22/91
I 1 11/21/91
1 2 05/08/91
1 4 06/01/91
I 1 06/05/91
1 1 06/18/91
1 1 01/02/91
I 1 01/22/91
1 1 01/27/91
I 1 01/21/91
1 1 01/21/91
1 1 01/21/91
1 1 01/21/91
I 1 01/22/91
1 1 01/25/91
1 2 02/03/91
1 1 02/03/91
1 1 02/08/91
I 2 03/05/91
1 1 03/14/91
I 2 05/08/91
I 3 05/08/91
I 1 05/08/91
I 2 05/09/91
I 3 05/09/91
1 1 06/02/91
1 3 06/10/91
1 4 06/10/91
1 6 06/10/91
1 9 06/10/91
1 11 06/10/91
1 1 06/13/91
1 1 06/18/91
1 1 06/18/91
1 1 06/21/91
1 1 06/25/91
1 1 06/28/~1
1 1 06/22/9i
I 3 06/22/91',
I 1 06/24/91
1 1 07/08/91
1 2 07/08/91
I 1 07/08/91
$170
$150
$190
$75
$2OO
$425
$100
S525
$279
$3,OO0
$2
$115
$19~
$1~
$228
$10
$95
$5O
$16
S100
$1,120
$45O
$150
$5O
$100
$208
S65
$100
$182
$1,150
$1,000
$2OO
$5OO
$110
S1,020
$529
$50
$150
$150
$37
01/28/91 $3,000
06/19/91 $200
06/21/91 $500
06/25/91 $110
07/01/91 $1,020
PROP PROP
TYPE DESC
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EGP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EGP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
SPT EQP DEPTHF
SPT E(Ao SNCXqf4C)
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
UNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCT
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
:URNCY
:URNCY
:URNCY
INCIDENT SEQ TYPE
NUIqBER NO NO
91001Q36 I 2
91001052 I 1
91001112 I 5
91001141 I 1
91001153 I 1
91001217 1
91001218 I 1
91001245 1 1
910012~6 1 1
91001338 1 1
91001438 1 1
91001~7 1 1
91001472 1 1
910016~6 1 1
91001838 1 1
9100186~ 1 1
91001910 1 1
91001955 I 1
91002081 I 1
91002123 I 2
91002132 I 1
91002139 1 1
91002140 1 1
91000627 1 1
91000122 1 1
91000114 1 2
91000129 1 1
91000225 1 1
91000226 1 1
91000319 1 1
91000358 1 1
91000368 1 1
91000448 1 1
91000~53 1 2
91000541 1 1
91000576 I 1
91000584 1 1
910006?.4 1 3
91000631 1 3
9100064:~ 1 1
9100067'0 I 1
91000673 1 1
91000686 1 1
91000689 I I
INSTALLATION NA/4E -- ~OUND POLICE DEPJUtTNENT
ENFORS
PROPERTY - $TOCEN/RECOVERED
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
DATE STOLEN DATE RECOVERED
STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED VALUE
07/08/91 $280
07/11/91 $25
07/12/91 $121
07/22/91 $162
07/2S/91 $1,200 07/24/91 S9,000
07/28/91 $150
07/29/91 $230
07/11/91 $750 07/11/91 $750
08/0r/91 $20,000 08/07/91 $20,000
08/17'/91 $2,50O
08/25/91 $9,000 08/26/91 $9,000
09/04/91 $210
08/'50/91
09/13/91 $500
11/06/91 $500
11/12/91 S500
11/19/91 $190
11/25/91 $50
12/20/91 $375
12/30/91 $40
12/16/91 $150
12/'50/91 $10
12/30/91 $20
05/08/91 $515
01/27/91 $3,000
01/24/91
01/28/91 $15
02/14/91 $350 02/14/91 $350
02/14/91 Sl,941
03/06/91 $20 03/12/91 $20
03/10/91 $10
03/14/91 $3O
03/31/91 S75 03/31/91 S78
04/02/91
04/18/91 $7'0 04/19/90 $35
04/26/91 $18
04129191 $520
05/05/91 $15
05/08/91' $10
05/09/91 '. S5
05/14/91 $161
05/15/91 $15
05/18/91
05/18/91
PAGE
RUg: 29- JAIl-92
PI~03
PROP PROP
TYPE DESC
INSTALLATION NAME -- HOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
PROPERTY - STOLEN/RECOVERED
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
INCIDENT SEQ TYPE DATE STOLEN DATE RECOVERED
NUNBER NO NO STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED VALUE
PAGE ?
CIJRNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CIJRNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CU~NCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
CURNCY
OTR NV
VIEglNG
VIB/ING
VIEWING
VIEI,/ING
VIEglNG
VIEUING
VIEI/ING
V[B/ING
NV PETS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PETS
NV PRTS
91000691
9100069'2
91000704,
91000710
91000757
91000867
91000875
91000953
91001035
91001075
91001215
91001265
91001~09
91001~43
91001~55
91001~90
91001707
9100173~
91001905
91001915
91002056
91001138
9100062&
91000629
91000629
91000778
91001035
91001112
91001292
91001~,5
90001998
91000090
91000115
91000500
91000821
91000835
910009~9
91001033
91001196
91001:~16
91001~65
91001~69
91001408
91001455
05/18/91
05/18/91
05/20/91
05/21/91
05/28/91
06/15/91
06/13/91
06/26/91
07/08/91
07/15/91
08/0:~/91
08/05/91
08/29/91
09/03/91
09/05/91
09/11/91
10/18/91
10/21/91
11/18/91
11/20/91
12/16/91
07/22/91
05/05/91
05/08/91
05/08/91
06/01/91
07/08/91
07/12/91.
08/11/91
08/20/91
11/18/90
01/19/91
01/24/91
03/01/91
06/08/91
06/10/91
06/24/91
07/08/9,1
07/30/91
08/02/91
08/21/91
08/22/91
08/28/91
09/06/91
$6O
S12
$1
$290 05/21/91 $290
$2,973
$5 06/15/91 $5
$100
~0
$330
Sl 07/15/91 Sl
$508
$2O
$200
$35
$2?
$5
$150
$50
t~11
S20
t~50
S260
$75
$5O
S1,000
$125
Sl,200
$550 09/27/91 $550
$500
~0
$15
$28
$240 07/19/91 $240
$50 07/30/91 $50
$50
$3O
$150
$100
$100
T¥~ DE~
NV P~TS
NV PRTS
MV PRTS
MV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRT$
NV PRT$
NV PitTS
NV PRTS
MV PRTS
NV PRTS
14V PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PitTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PitTS
:TS
rS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
14t/ PRTS
NV PRTS
NV PRTS
14V PRTS BATTER
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EOP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
INCIDENT SEQ TYPE
NUMBER NO NO
910014~69 I 1
91001563 1 1
91001579 1 1
91001600 I 1
9100160~ 1 1
91001613 2 1
91001621 1 1
9100166,:3 1 1
9100166~ 1 1
91001~65 1 1
91001667 I 1
91001761 1 1
91001766
91001769 1 1
91001790 1 1
91001818 1 1
91001826 1 1
91001828 1 1
91001902 1 1
91001956 1 1
91001979 1 1
91001980 1 1
91002005 1 1
91002006 1 1
91002026 1 1
91002053 1 1
91002065 1 1
91002096 1 1
91002098 1 1
910005~8 1 1
91000278 I 3
91000313 2 1
91000316 1 1
91000376 1 1
91~ 1
91000575 1 1
91000601 I 1
9100060:> 1 1
91000602 1
91000606 1 1
91O00616 1 1
91000622 1 1
91000631 1
910006,~:> 1 4
INSTALLATION NAME -- NOUIiO POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
PROPERTY - STOLEN/RECOVERED
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
DATE STOLEN DATE RECOVERED
STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED VALUE
09/11/91 $35
09/23/91 S100
09/27/91 S100
O9/30/91 $100
09/30/91 S150
10/01/91 Slo9
10/03/91 $60
10/12/91 S35
10/12/91 Sl
10/12/91 $35
10/12/91 $50
10/24/91 S50
10/25/91 S30
10/25/91 S100
10/28/91 $50
11/0~/91 S120
11/05/91 S75
11/26/91 $75
12/02/91 $80
12/02/91
12/06/91 $12
12/06/91 $75
12/10/91 $250
12/16/91 $80
12/18/91 S30
12/24/91 $250 ·
12/24/91 $350
04/20/91
02/25/91 $600
03/0~/91 S1 , 613
03/05/91 $,6
03/15/91
0~/01/91 $60
04,/26/91 $465
05/01/91 $50
05/01/91 S500
05/01/91~ $4,8
05/03/91 ', $~0
05/03/91
05/05/91
05/08/91 $779
05/O9/91 S189
12/19/91
11/07/91
12/24/91
12/24/91
t~O
$2,200
$250
$~-65
PAGE
PROP PROP
TYPE DESC
IN~AL~TI~ ~ -- NIXIND ~Z~ DEP~NT
ENFORS
PROPERTY - STOLEN/RECOVERED
01/01/91 THRU 12/31/91
iNCIDENT SEQ TYPE DATE STOLEN DATE RECOVERED
NUNBER gO NO STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED VALUE
PAGE
9
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
EQP TLS
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
91000672
910O076~
91000769
91000778
91000789
91000789
9100097/,
910011/,1
91001170
91001197
910012/8
91001251
91001929
91002019
91O021~
91OO2126
91002127
91002138
91O021&0
90000952
91O0O0~7
91000151
91000160
910002/,6
91000261
910004,22
910O0~36
91000601
91000628
910006~
91000686
91O0070&
91O007~
91000821
91000868
910008~
91000905
91000975
91000976
91001018
91001112
91001128
910011&1
91001160
05/15/91
05/~9/91
05/'50/91
06/01/91
06/03/91
06/03/91
06/30/91
07/22/91
07/25/91
07/30/91
08/06/91
07/29/91
11/22/91
12/09/91
12/'50/91
12/21/91
12/50/91
12/29/91
12/30/91
06/01/90
01/06/91
02/02/91
02/05/91
02/18/91
02/?.3/91
03/27/91
03/28/91
05/01/91
05108191
05/18/91
05/18/91
05/20/91
05/26/91
06/08/91
06/15/91
06/16/91
06/17/91
06/30/9,1
07/01/9~
07/O6/91
07/12/91
07/22/91
07/22/91
07/24/91
Sl ,305
S4O0
$150
$391
S120
S1,870
$14
Sl, ?59
$669
$350
$110
$122
$728
$65
$85
$85
$110
$78
$56
$59
$20
$15
$15
$20
$10
$105
$100
$550
$15
$9O
$9
$5O
$40
$26
$50
$1
$235
$134
$16
$50
06/05/91
02/23/91
03/27/91
03/28/91
07/06/91
07/22/91
07/26/91
S78
S15
$20
$10
$1
S134
S5
ITU.:
PROP PROP
TYPE DES(:
[NCIDENT
NLMBER
]NSTALI.,~T]ON NNdE -- NOUND POLZCE DEPARTNENT
ENFORS
PROPERTY - STOLEN/RECOVERED
01/01/91 THRU 1:>/31/91
SEQ TYPE DATE STOLEN DATE RECOVERED
NO NO STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED VALUE
PAGE
10
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
TR
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
91001169
91001236
91001251
91001298
91001303
91001325
91001345
91001416
91001443
91001466
91001522
91001586
91001590
91001630
91001701
91001767
91001819
91001841
91001865
91001883
91001900
91001922
91002020
92000019
07/25/91
08/0~/91
07/29/91
08/13/91
08/13/91
08/15/91
08120191
08/31/91
09/03/91
09/06/91
09/17/91
09/27/91
09/27/91
10/05/91
10/17/91
10/25/91
11/02/91
11 / 06/91
11/12/91
11/14/91
11/18/91
11/21/91
12/09/91
01/0/,/92
$150 07/25/91
Sloo
$145
$110
$100
$110
$2,000
$500
S100 09/06/91
$120
$1,500 09/27/91
$25
$2O
$20 10/17/91
$100
$1
$500 11/06/91
$150
$500
$10
$350 12/31/91
$325
$1,700 01/07/91
$150
$100
$1,500
$2O
S250
S350
Sl,700
TOTALS: $334,359
S157,80~
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 !687
i6!2) 472-1155
FAX (612) 472 0620
March 6, 1992
MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER
I have enclosed the 1991 Annual Report of the Finance Department. The
purpose of the report is to point out the financial condition of the City of Mound, to
the City Council, which sets the policies that direct the future of this City. The
financial recaps included in this report provide you with a preliminary summary of the
City of Mound's financial position for 1991.
1991 was an eventful year in the Finance Department. I would like to thank
the Finance Department for their hard work during this challenging year. I look
forward to a productive year in 1992.
Respectfully,
John L. Norman
Finance Director
printed on recycled paper
The first responsibility I have is the supervision of the Finance
Department Staff. The following is the current personnel in the
Finance Department:
TITLE
STARTING DATE
John Norman
Lois Sandquist
Delores Schwalbe
Gayle Burns
Finance Director 9-16-85
Utility Billing Clerk 2-01-70
Payables/Assessing Clerk 7-28-75
Payroll/Account Clerk 12-21-77
For the first time since 1979, excluding the finance director,
there was a change in the finance department staff. In August,
Judy Fisher unexpectedly submitted her resignation after 12 years
of excellent work for the City. The job duties of the position
were allocated among finance department staff and other
departments. The largest impact on finance was the addition of
payroll in Gayle's duties and the addition of the accounts payable
to Dee's duties. The finance staff should be commended for the
teamwork and cooperation they have demonstrated during this
difficult transition. The cost savings as a result of the
consolidation played a major role in preparing the 1992 budget.
LOIS SANDOUIST
Lois handles the water and sewer billing process. We have
approximately 3150 residential accounts that are billed quarterly
on a cyclical basis (the city is divided into three billing
districts). In addition, there are approximately 125 commercial
accounts that receive a bill every month.
We have numerous rental properties in Mound. Under State Statute,
the utility bill stays with the property, i.e., the owner is liable
for the bill if the renter leaves an unpaid utility bill. We run
into this situation frequently.
DELORES SCHWALBE
Dee does the special assessment searches for properties which are
requested by realtors, title companies or residents when a house in
Mound is purchased. We charge $10 a parcel for a search.
Dee also receipts any prepayments of special assessments. When a
property is sold or refinanced, usually assessments are paid off.
We notify the County of the prepayment (the County collects all
current special assessments on the tax statements). They then
remove the assessment from future years assessment rolls. During
1990 we collected $70,433 on prepayments for various special
assessment levies. This money is invested to pay off the special
assessment bonds when they become due.
Dee also is the administrator of the Metro HRA Section 8 Rent
Assistance Program for Mound, as well as for Minnetrista, St.
Bonifacius and Spring Park. Currently, there are 40 families in
our area receiving Section 8 assistance. The City gets reimbursed
monthly on a per residence basis, currently $16.21. Revenue
collected during 1991 was $6,200.
Delores took over accounts payable duties in August 1991. Ail
invoices must be coded to the proper account so budget to actual
comparisons are meaningful. The incoming bills are grouped and
entered into the computer and brought to the Council for
authorization of payment. We try to pay as many bills as possible
at the two council meetings. However, checks are done manually for
items such as liquor bills in order to take advantage of all
discounts~
GAYLE BURNS
Gayle took over payroll duties in August. She maintains the
payroll records and gets payroll process every two weeks. All
timesheets must be reviewed and entered into the computer, checks
generated and reports printed. Gayle also works in the following
areas:
o
o
o
o
o
Inputting into the computer for the finance system.
Miscellaneous billing and reports for other agencies
Assist in reports for the Liquor Store:
- daily receipting
- monthly sales tax reports, NSF checks
Does bank reconciliation
Renting out of the Depot
- The Depot rental income decreased over the last year:
1991 1990 1989 1988 1987
$1400 $1000 $1310 $1500 $1000
INVESTMENTS
Cash management and investment of City funds is an important aspect
of my job. The first objective in investing City funds is safety
and legal constraints. Taking safety into account, I look for the
best market rate of return, normally within a 3-6 month range. I
continue to follow a policy of investing only with broker/dealers
in this state. The following is a breakdown of investments as of
December 31, 1991:
U.S. Government Agencies
u.s. Treasury Securities
Commercial Paper
Certificates of Deposit
Government Trust Pool
TOTAL
$2,314,030
380,226
2,757,189
835,000
665,924
$6,952,369
A comparison of interest earned for the City on all funds is as
follows:
1991 $536,331
1990 $652,335
1989 $746,975
1988 $647,720
Interest income is down $116,004 from last year. The decrease was
due to two factors; first, the short-term interest rates began the
year at 7% and steadily declined to 4% by year end. The second
reason was the average investment balance decreased by $800,000
from 1990 to 1991.
Ail interest income is accumulated in the Investment Trust Account
and distributed to the funds in proportion to the average balance
during the year. For example, during 1991, the General Fund was
allocated $12,960 in interest (2.4% of all interest earned) while
the 1980 Street Improvement Debt Service Fund was allocated
$192,669 in interest (35.9% of total interest).
Interest is a very important revenue source. In most of our
special assessment projects, the City has the authority to levy
general tax dollars to help finance the debt issued on projects.
Interest earnings is a major factor in the City not levying general
taxes on the special assessment debt.
BUDGET
Preparing the data for the annual budget document that is submitted
to the Council is another important function of my job. During
June, I estimate the revenues for the current year and also work on
an estimate of the expenditures for the current year. I work
closely with the city manager in budgeting revenue amounts for the
following year. The Finance Department budget is my
responsibility, along with Assessing and City Property, Special
Revenue Funds and debt service requirements. Once the city manager
reviews the expenditure budgets with each of the department heads,
the budget is compiled, analyzed and adjustments are made. The
document is then prepared and presented to the Council for
approval. The Water and Sewer Funds are examined during the budget
process. The projected revenues and expenses are used to determine
the adequacy of the rates. The Enterprise Funds (Liquor, Water and
Sewer) are presented to the Council along with the General Fund for
Council approval.
After the 1991 budget was adopted, the state cut the LGA payments
during 1991 by $71,758. The LGA was also cut the same amount in
1992. The budget was brought into balance in part due to staff
reductions in the finance department and city mechanic. We are
facing uncertainty in the coming months with the state's budget
shortfall. The Local Government Trust Fund may be tapped into by
the state. Any further cuts in state aid in 1992 or 1993 will pose
significant challenges for the staff and Council.
OUTSTanDING DEBT
The total outstanding debt as of 12-31-91 is $6,790,000.
following details the outstanding debt:
The
COMMERCE PLACE DEBT SERVICE BONDS
This fund accounts for principal and interest payments on the bonds
sold in 1985. The bonds will be paid for from the tax increment
from the Commerce Place Development. The increment from the
development is sufficient to make the principal and interest
payments. With the developers letter of credit and the Mound
Clinic and Thrifty White as corner stores, Commerce Place is
meeting all of its financial obligations. The City made principal
payments of $85,000 during 1991, and has an outstanding balance of
$1,865,000 at December 31, 1991.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS
Special Assessment Funds are used to account for the construction
and financing of certain 'public improvements such as streets,
sidewalks, street lighting and storm sewers. Bonds are issued and
are paid for in full or in part from the special assessments levied
against benefited properties. No new bonds were issued during
1991. The City made principal payments of $720,000 during 1991,
and has an outstanding balance of special assessments bonds payable
of $4,055,000 at December 31, 1991.
WATER REVENUE BONDS
The principal and interest on water revenue bonds are paid out of
the revenue generated from the water bills. There were no new
water revenue bonds issued in 1991. The City made principal
payments of $45,000 during 1991, and has an outstanding balance of
$190,000 at December 31, 1991.
PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY DEBT SERVICE
This fund accounts for the principal and interest on bonds issued
in 1988. The principal revenue source is a property tax levy. The
City made principal payments of $40,000 during 1991 and has an
outstanding balance of $680,000 at December 31, 1991.
The following shows the total outstanding debt for the city of
Mound over the past 10 years:
1982 $12,962,000
1983 $11,929,000
1984 $11,146,000
1985 $12,142,000
1986 $11,047,000
1987 $10,060,000
1988 $10,060,000
1989 $ 9,040,000
1990 $ 7,680,000
1991 $ 6,790,000
1992 projected $ 5,835,000
Using the 1990 census population, our total debt per capita
decreased from $1345 in 1982 to $705 in 1991. If no new bonds are
issued over the next four years, the balance in outstanding bonds
would be reduced to $3.5 million by the end of 1995.
This decrease in total outstanding debt illustrates the fact that
Mound is a mature suburb and has not had to issue debt do develop
new streets and watermains. For example; cities of our size that
have been rapidly expanding have the following debt outstanding at
the end of 1990:
Chanhassen
Chaska
Champlin
Shakopee
$38,594,620
$30,765,000
$28,137,250
$15,525,000
5
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVIES
The general property tax levy is discussed every year during the
budget process. The other significant item on the tax statement
for Mound residents are the various special assessment levies. The
following is the annual special assessments levied on Mound
taxpayers during the past ten years:
1982 1,489,700
1983 1,353,400
1984 1,234,600
1985 1,101,100
1986 992,000
1987 870,800
1988 740,700
1989 696,000
1990 633,600
1991 544,000
The major street projects were completed in 1978-1980. The total
assessments on the taxpayers increased dramatically once these
projects were assessed. Since 1982, the annual assessments have
consistently declined. The corresponding Special Assessment bonds
payable has decreased from $12,497,000 in 1982 to $4,055,000 in
1991.
AUDIT
Preparing for the annual audit is another important responsibility
in my job. I prepare all the statements, schedules and notes to
the financial statements for the annual audit. Our audit costs are
reduced since all the statements and notes are done in house.
The 1990 audit report received the National GFOA award "Certificate
of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting". The
certificate program judges an audit report on various criteria,
including clarity, comparability and completeness. This is the
third consecutive year the City of Mound has received this award.
I plan on updating the audit report annually and submit future
years reports for this award.
INSURANCE
We have the majority of our insurance coverage with the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. They have provided the City with
good coverage and the costs for insurance have stabilized in the
last couple of years. Our agent of record is Earl Bailey of R.L.
Youngdahl & Associates, Inc.
I have the responsibility of coordinating the City's insurance
activity. I file all claims that are made against our insurance
6
policies for the City automobiles, property damage and general
liability.
COMPUTEROPERATIONS
It is my responsibility to supervise the overall computer
operation. 1991 was an exciting year with the aDproval by the
Council at the end of the year to update the computer for the
financial operations. The existing Texas Instruments hardware will
still be operated by the police department. The hardware has been
very reliable, with no downtime in 54 months. We will be completed
with the five year lease in June 1992.
The new IBM RISC 6000 computer has arrived and the following
software programs are currently operating: utility billing,
financial, accounts payable, payroll and special assessments. The
new computer upgrade also included four new PC's (the old PC's went
to the police department). The speed of the new computer hardware
is unbelieveable. On the old system, the full utility billing
cycle used to take 7 hours 15 minutes. Under the new system it
took 27 minutes. The added efficiency is a welcome addition with
one less staff person in the finance department.
7
FUND STRUCTURE
The following is a description of the funds of the City of Mound:
GENERAL FUND
The General Fund accounts for the Revenues and Expenditures to
carry out the basic governmental activities of the City, such as
administration, police, inspections, streets and parks. General
Fund expenditures are made primarily for current day to day
operating expenses. Major sources of revenue are the property tax
and local government aid.
REVENUES
Revenues received for general governmental operations are
$2,166,092. The following is an analysis of the major revenue
sources of the General Fund - budget to actual for 1991:
TAXES
LICENSES & PERMIT
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
COURT FINES
MISCELLANEOUS
BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE % RECEIVED
$1,198,890 $1,149,583 (49,307) 95.9
72,800 72,771 (29) 99.9
773,580 753,097 (20,483) 97.4
95,000 64,642 (30,358) 68.0
114,550 125,999 11,449 110.0
TOTAL $2,254,820 $2,166,092 (88,728) 96.1
EXPENDITURES
Expenditures for general government operations were $2,209,905 in 1991.
The following is a budget to actual comparison by department:
DEPARTMENTS
BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE %EXPENDED
Mayor and Council $61,300' $59,615 $1,685 97.3
city Manager/Clerk 161,230 160,142 1,088 99.3
Elections 590 324 266 54.9
Assessing 44,600 44,200 400 99.1
Finance 171,040 159,470 11,570 93.2
Computer 30,250 28,788 1,462 95.2
Legal 76,950 69,401 7,549 90.2
city Property 88,200 101,964 (13,764) 115.6
Police 742,760 725,056 17,704 97.6
Planning & Insp. 123,130 124,807 (1,677) 101.4
Emergency Prep. 2,700 2,406 294 89.1
Streets 383,970 411,600 (27,630) 107.2
Shops & Stores 59,310 48,436 10,874 81.7
Parks 162,850 152,425 10,425 93.6
Other 38,030 13,815 24,215 36.3
Transfers 107,460 107,456 4 100.0
TOTAL $2,254,370 $2,209,905 44,465 98.0
FUND B~CE
The total fund balance of the General Fund is projected to be $599,100
for the year ended 1991. The balance decreased $43,834 during the year.
It is important for the City to maintain the current fund balance. This
reserve is necessary to meet expenses in the General Fund until tax
money and local government aid comes in June.
The following table shows previous year end General Fund balances,
compared to adopted expenditures budget of the following year:
GENERAL FUND
BUDGET
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
BEGINNING OF YEAR
PERCENTAGE
1985 $1,640,567 $415,590 25.3
1986 1,868,109 533,599 28.6
1987 2,073,720 743,810 35.9
1988 2,128,550 803,207 37.9
1989 2,236,430 749,654 33.5
1990 2,327,090 629,326 27.0
1991 2,264,150 642,934 28.4
1992 2,251,350 599,100 26.6
After the 1991 budget was adopted, the state cut the LGA payment to the
city of Mound by $71,758. During March 1991, the Council adopted
various budget cuts and cost allocation measures to eliminate $39,705
from the General Fund budget. These cuts made up for the July 1991 LGA
reduction. The December 1991 LGA reduction was taken out of the General
Fund Reserves. The LGA cuts were also effective for 1992 and the 1992
budget reflected the reduction in LGA revenue.
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Special Revenue Funds are used to account for certain tax levies and
other earmarked revenue. The following is a list of the City's Special
Revenue Funds and Fund balances as~of 12-31-91:
Cemetery $ 947
Pension 87,350
CDBG -0-
Area Fire Ser. 60,350
Dock 31,620
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS
Capital project funds have been established to segregate funds to be
used for various types of capital outlay expenditure.
In early 1990, all of the bonds outstanding in the Capital Improvements
Debt Services fund were called in early. This fund included all bonds
issued before 1978. The remaining balance (approximately $1,800,000)
was transferred to a Capital Projects Fund. The following is the 1991
activity of this fund:
CITY OF MOUND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND
1991 ACTIVITY
BALANCE 1-1-91
$1,015,590
REVENUES
51,251
TOTAL AVAILABLE
1,066,841
EXPENDITURES
COMPUTER
FIRE CAPITAL RESERVE
DEPOT DECK
ISLAND PARK ROOF REPAIR
CBD LOT ACQUISITION
PW STORAGE
PHONE SYSTEM
CITY HALL
CITY HALL - SOIL CONTAMINATION
CITY HALL MISCELLANEOUS
CITY HALL FUNITURE/FURNISHINGS
AUDIO/VISUAL EQUIPMENT
60,635
20,195
4,367
13,416
42,600
9,211
15,129
164,246
2,759
20,452
62,962
28,763
TOTAL EXPENSES
$ 444,735
BALANCE REMAINING
$ 622,106
The above expenses do not include a deposit of $233,507 with
Hennepin County for condemnation proceedings against Dakota Rail
for CBD lot acquisition. The Capital Improvements Fund is an
important one-time revenue source for the City of Mound. It allows
the City to undertake projects that benefit the City without having
to issue debt to finance them. We will receive reimbursement for
computer purchase, city hall soil contamination and part of the
cost of CBD lot acquisition over the next few years.
MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
This fund is the remaining balance and assessments from the 1981
MSA Street Fund. The fund is used for department capital outlay
purchases. 1991 expenditures included:
Police
1991 Pontiac Bonneville (plus conversion costs)
IBM Wheelwriter typewriter
Copy Machine
$15,918
1,192
3,636
10
L'73
Parks
Mowers 913
SEALCOAT
This fund is a five-year rotation to sealcoat the streets in Mound.
The total cost of the project for 1991 was $53,988, which was
financed by the Liquor Store profits.
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Enterprise Funds are used to account for the financing of services
to the general public in which all or most of the revenues are
generated from user charges.
LIQUOR FUND
1991 was an excellent year for the Liquor Store. Sales exceeded
the million dallar mark for the first time. Profits are up from
1990 and $40,000 over the projected profits in the 1991 budget. A
condensed preliminary summary for the liquor operations for the
years ended December 31, 1991, 1990 and 1989 is presented below:
1991 1990 1989
Sales 1,144,247 $939,285 $892,028
Cost of Sales 873,710 721,268 683,553
GROSS PROFIT 270,537 218,475 208,475
Expenses 171,984 162,766 159,749
Operating Income 98,553
55,251 48,726
Other Income
Transfers Out
9,601 8,785 7,422
(62,538) (43,161) (49,749)
NET INCOME $45,616 20,875 6,399
WATER FUND
A condensed preliminary summary of the Water Fund operations for
the years ended December 31, 1991, 1990, and 1989 is presented
below:
11
1991 1990 1989
Revenues 321,202
Expenses 341,302
Operating Income (Loss) (20,100)
Other Income/Expenses
(including interest on bonds) 12,638
Net Income (Loss) $(7,462)
$337,819 $346,898
(351,316) (326,595)
(13,497) 20,303
24,365 17,672
$10,868 $37,975
Transfer to City
(10,700) (55,000)
1991 revenues were down 5% from 1990, primarily due to the wet year
in 1991. The cash balance in the water fund decreased from
$343,506 to $318,092. We will examine the water rates during the
1993 budget process.
SEWER FUND
A condensed preliminary summary of the Sewer Fund operations for
the years ended December 31, 1991, 1990 and 1989 is presented
below:
1991 1990 1989
Revenues
Expenses
$584,886
(716,411)
$583,951
(630,434)
$588,892
(594,289)
Operating Loss
(131,525) (46,483) 5,397)
Other Income
68,488 96,119 87,690
Net Income $(63,037) $49,636 $82,293
Transfer to City
(10,700)
The revenue in the Sewer Fund has remained steady over the past 4
years. Expenses were up due mainly to the MWCC. The MWCC expense
increased by $61,270, due to the expiration of credits from the
acquisition of sewer system by MWCC. The cash balance stands at
approximately $870,000 at the end of 1991. The large cash balance
has enabled the City to continue the expensive process of upgrading
the lift stations without having to issue debt to pay for the
expense. During 1992, we are upgrading five lift stations at an
estimated cost of $260,700. Beginning in 1993, we plan on
upgrading one lift station per year to preserve our cash reserve
position at an adequate level.
The sewer rates were increased effective 1-1-92 (first increase in
6 years). A major concern as we look ahead to 1993 is the charge
12
from MWCC. We pay the MWCC based upon an estimated flow. The
actual flow is determined following the end of the year, with the
adjustment on MWCC billings the subsequent year. Normally, the
estimate is very close to the actual, therefore, the adjustment is
small. However, the 1991 estimated flow was 350 million gallons
(MG), the actual flow was measured at 421 MG or 20% higher than the
estimate. The increase was explained that our flow has
historically been impacted by increases in rainfall. The effect on
our 1993 MWCC billing for 1991 adjustment is approximately $77,000.
We will have to take into consideration all these factors when we
examine the cash reserves and rate structure for the 1993 budget.
RECYCLING
During the 1991 budget process a Recycling Fund was established to
accurately monitor the activity of the recycling service in Mound.
In previous years, the recycling activity was included in the
General Fund. The following is the revenue and expenditure for
recycling in 1991:
REVENUES
Hennepin County - 80% reimbursment
- yard waste
$56,635
4,914
Utility Billing Charge Si/household
penalty
44,212
1,195
Sale of Recyclables
7,296
TOTAL REVENUES
$114,252
EXPENSES
Salaries 7,835
Supplies 3,649
Postage 355
Miscellaneous 238
Recycle Lotto 2,600
Leaf Pick up 5,500
Recycling Hauler 69,827
TOTAL EXPENSES
90,004
BALANCE 12-31-91 $24,248
The recycling budget is $11,088 over the projected balance of
$13,160 in the 1991 budget. We did not budget for sale of
recyclables during 1991. Ironically, we did budget for sales
of recyclables in 1991, however, with the lack of market for
recyclables, the last rebate check we received was November 1991.
13
Hennepin County has stated that 1992 will be the final year they
will reimburse cities on a percentage basis of expenses. Beginning
in 1993, the county is going to reimburse based upon a flat fee per
household. We will examine the effect on the recycling fund during
the 1993 budget process.
ORGANIZATIONS
I am a member of the Minnesota Government Finance officers
Association (MGFOA). There are currently 550 members. There are
monthly meetings in the metro area and an annual conference held in
the fall of the year. I served as treasurer of MGFOA during 1991.
This means that I will be on track (Secretary, Vice President) to
be President in 1994. This is an excellent opportunity and
challenge to look forward to over the next few years. An
interesting aspect to being President of MGFOA in 1994 is that the
National GFOA Conference (approximately 4000 - 7000 delegates
attend) will be held in Minneapolis in the summer of 1994.
I am a member of the Minnesota Society of CPA's. One of the
requirements of keeping current my CPA certificate is that I
maintain a continuing education program each year. Continuing
education and training is a high priority in my professional
development. I get the vast majority of my education credits
through MGFOA.
I attend all meetings of the Economic Development Commission as an
ex-officio member.
I am also Treasurer of the Mound Crime Prevention Association.
CONCLUSION
I have tried to point out the areas of special note in the
operation of the Finance Department. I have worked on various
projects and have researched information for the city Manager
throughout the year. I am also required, to fill out numerous
surveys and reports to send to other governments and other
organizations. I will be attending the March llth Council meeting
to answer any questions that you have regarding my annual report.
JN:ls
14
am$ Oc/atJon of
.e__rr. opoljl:.gn
mun c p(]hne$
Pr D D - o ,~J
Legislative
Contact
Alert
March 9, 1992
TO: Mayors, Legislative Contacts and Managers/Administrators
FROM: Roger Peterson,
Director of Legislative Affairs
Vern Peterson, Executive Director
RE: GOVERNOR,S BUDGET PROPOSAL AND STATUS OF MAJOR METROPOLiTAN
AREA PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE BILLS
I. GOVERNORS BUDGET HAMMERS CITIES!
CUTS TO CITIES OUTRAGEOUS!
The Governor,s overall budget proposal uses accounting gimmicks for
savings of $178 million for schools, reduces ~rainy day fund' by
$140 million, cuts state agencies and higher education by $164
million, and cities LGA by $71.6 million.
City aid .cut of $71.6 million is
city. disparity reduction {R .__ 2~.of LGA, equalization air
equals an 8%-nlus --.~ -~ ~--' ~or cztzes r · . . -,
= ~ uz ~evenue base (i.e ecezvlng these azds, this
· aids plus levy).
Schools, Counties, Towns, Special Districts, get ZERO cuts. They
are held harmless! Not all cities are cut. Those receiving only
HACA have no cut. Is this divide and conquer?
Enclosed is a preliminary run showin
AMM position at this ~o~ ~ .... g the impact on AMM c~
Additional us~ ~ ~ ~"~ z~ ~na~ cuts to cit' ~=~. The
_~ _ .~ u~ une rain~ da,. ~---= - les are Unnecessa
c,,~- ...... ,= - zu certainly be nre~---=~- ~ -- un ~ne state,s bon~
-~ -uuzu nave on ~ ...... r ~ze ~O the ma~. : ....
are force~ ~- --,--".~"= ~eneral public healeh ~-a -f~. z~pac: the
- ~ m~e large cuts. --- ~,u sazety if cities
Cities should contact their legislators and relate how this may
-1-
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-4008
impact locally. The AMM absolutely does not want to get into a
battle among cities but pointing out that schools, counties and
towns are held harmless is appropriate. ·
POINTS TO STRESS:
Cities have already done their part. Local government, through
aid cuts and support of sales tax increase, solved 41% of the
state's $1.2 billion problem in 1991 while accounting for only
10% of the state budget. Likewise, we solved over 35% of the
problem in 1990· For the past 3 years, cities have taken cuts,
held levies down, spent tax dollars wisely, reduced employees
and this is our reward. ,
The administration says this is a 1·1% cut of base. This is
very misleading. The cut is 1.1% of all County, City, Town, and
Special District Revenue but only cities are cut. The cut
becomes 3.5% of all city revenue but 7% of operating budgets
when non-cuttable special assessment revenue is eliminated.
Finally, the cut becomes about 8% after non£LGA cities are
removed· When one gets beyond smoke and mirrors, this is a 23%
cut of all city LGA and an 8% cut of city revenue base.
Cities need to communicate the impact of these cuts to their
legislators· Remind them of the cutbacks already taken.
Register indignation· Think about use of city newsletters and
local media to get the unfairness story out. It is about time
the state stops solving its problems on the back of cities.
Minnesota cities spend at about the national average, but when
all Minnesota state and local governments are added together,
spending is much greater than the national average· We aren't
the problem and shouldn,t be the solution.
NOTE 1: THE ATTACHED RUN IS BASED ON ALL $71.6 MILLION AID CUT
COMING FROM CITIES AID NOT INCLUDING F. ACA. THE REVENUE BASE
USED WAS 1991 WHICH SHOULD BE SIMILAR TO 1992. THE ACTUAL
CUTS MAY VARY BY A FEW DOLLARS.
NOTE 2: THE AMM HAS JUST ~ZLRNED THAT THE ADMINISTRATiON HAS
DELAYED RELEASING THE ACTUAL PLAN AND BILL, THUS THEY MAy BE
WORKING ON CHANGES TO THEIR PROPOSAL?
APPLE VALLEY
ARDEN HILLS
BAYPOR!
JROO[LYH C[HTER
~ROO[LYH PAR[
~URHSVILLE
CHANPLIH
CHAHHASSEH
COOH RAPIDS
COTTAGE GROVE
CRYSTAL
DAYTON
· DEEPHAV£H
EDEH PRAI~ZE
ED~HA
GOLDEN VALLEY
HASTIHGS
HOPkiNS
TNVER GROVE
HANTOflED!
HAPLE GROVE
#APL£~OOD
HEHDOTA
MIHHETOH~A
HOUND
MOUNDS
HEN ~RIGHTON
HE~ HOPE
NORTH ST PAUL
OA[DALE
ORONO
OSS[O
PLYMOUTH
RICHFIELD
ROSEHOUHT
ROSEVII. LE
SAIHT ANTHONY
SAINT FRANCIS
SAIHT LOUIS PARt
SAINT PAUL
SAZNT PAUL PAR~
SAVAGE
SHAEOPF[
SH~£EViEW
SOUTH ST PAUl
SPRIIIG IAEE PAR[
$PR~N~ PAR[
STILLNATER
NAY?ATA
N~T ~T PAUl
Revenue
Oase
8268095
1508952
847897
5963657
22529287
729865l
11941835
2981583
3012O98
1464520
895J80
5029738
913180!
53238~9
5405523
916060
9807752
12677803
10369526
780728
62424R6
7021451
45805~2
5294749
4740254
JJ68027
7648602
761670J
179067845 J4611936
12695379 0
J905059 JSS4S~
J9~3229 J6Je~j
3549373 28962~
4856392 396282
174J0~4 1420~8
4772S7 3894~
9611857 0
26366~0 27043
J695340 J38340
~$00685 775256
~806306 3J0595
22982e9 228340
6641658
17054~0 1273J~
488976 25J36
J2695604 J035%J
JJ996J855 9788887
J072846 87544
2JJ5~j4 5025l
26050~0 J42925
4JJ93;4
J790051 0
61~2900 502893
10693,,? ~7280
4J~6453 34J6J~
]5~8357 0
0
30~072
346439
0
2J5~7
486634
0
595570
9J6537
3J7566
243297
J1950~
73047
4J0427
745J55
434425
44109]
32878
0
0
0
0
63707
373770
432052
953JJ
J229J6
62J523
ESTIMATED IIIPACT OF THE GOVErnOr'S BUDGET
PRELIHIHARY .. SEE ATTACHED MEMO FOR DETAI~'
Est. Percent Rev. hse Aid (LGA, Percent
Cut Cut After Cut D~A, LA) Cut
8.2! 3478520 J0445JJ 29.~
4.2% 292J656 346439 J00.02
O.Of
J508952 0 O.OZ
2.5Z 826~0 2J567 J00.0%
8.2% 5477023 J0~485J 44.9%
0.0% 225292~7 0 0.0%
8.2% 670308 1647J62
8.2% J03J554~ 1442889 63.5I
2.7~ 1162426 317566 100.0%
8.22 273828 43J653 56.42
O. OZ 30J209,
O 0.0%
8.22 13450L 280600 42.62
8.22 822J3 2405~6
8.2Z 4~J93J 30.42
J925545 2J.~2
8.2% 8o8664, 2J9J272 34.0%
8.2% 488941, 9064~4 47.9%
8.22 496443 1687778 26.J~
4.6~ 67820 32878
0.02 J00.02
9J606~ 0 0.0!
0.02 980775: 0 0.0!
0.02 J26778. 0
0.0~ J03695;
8.2Z 0 0.0!
7J702J J7JJ27 37.2Z
8.2! 57330qq J478¢60
0.3% " · ~4.4!
7002842 J8589 JO0.O:
8.2: 4206242 JJ54055 32.4Z
8.2~ 4862697 762287
8.2% 4353449 40747J 94.9%
8.2~ J072716 130200 73.2Z
J.~% 7525686 J22qj6
8.2% · 100.0%
6995J78 6558~3 94.~
0.0! 2282077 , 0
~.7Z J64455909 59926J60 24.4Z
0.0% J2695379
8.2Z J74%0 J 0 0.0!
8.22 J82J3~ ~ 276J84 $6.3!
8.2J 325974, I $6JJ~2 28.81
I 652558 44.4!
8.22 44601J 926657 42.8%
8.2! 159896 6575J6 2J.6~
8.2% 3~J667. ~ 570J98 48.6~
0.0~ J?JJ328 '
8.2% 0 O. OJ
438313 525JJ 74.2%
O.OZ 96JJ8~7
J.OZ 2609647 0 0.0~
27043
8. z ss7ooo .275897
8.2~ 8725429 ~0J57J0
8.2: 34O57 5.7,
· 1J J444054 2J S~
8.2% 256994q ~70551 '
0.0% ' 6J.~%
6641658 0 0.0!
7.5: J5781J4 J27316
8.2Z JJ659643 J805307 /.4%
8.2~ JJ0122968 38890877 2S.2!
8.22 985302 41866~ 20.9%
2.4: 20653~ 502~1 JO0. O:
5.5~ 2462J$5 J42925 JO0. O~
0.0%
4JJ9~4 0
0.0% J?900SJ 0 O.OZ
8.2~ 5660007 22792~7 22. J:
8.2! 982J07 204%4
O.P~ ·
4809q0 0 O.O:
8.2% 3844838 7JJ5J7 48.0%
0.0: 1558557 0 0.0:
8.2: 44J4245 J0~8748 -, o-
0.~:
472579J 0 0.@:
Aid After
Cut
735439
0
0
0
598212
0
J05J592
526352
0
1883,~
0
16JJTS
J67539
J5J3JJ8
J446JJ7
472039
J2466~7
0
0
0
0
0
J0742O
969573
0
780285
330235
2O666
34889
0
34360
4531422~
0
J2073J
39935J
362929
530~75
5J5448
295280
0
13567
0
0
J37557
2240454
JJ33459
J422JJ
0
0
0
769346
29~0J990
0
0
0
0
1776~44
JJ270~
o
$699O2
0
646542
0
0
March 11, 1992
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
RESOLUTION TO GRANT AN EXTENSION OF RESOLUTION %91-72
WHEREAS, Resolution #91-72, entitled "Resolution to
Approve a Minor Subdivision of Lots 11-14 & 20-23, Block 26,
Wychwood and Lot 8, Block 18, Seton,'PID #24-117-24 14 0015, 0046,
0057 & 0052, & #24-117-24 41 0163 & 0164, 4967 Wilshire Blvd (p
& Z Case #91-015),. .,
, was adopted on May 28, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the applicant,s attorney attempted to file the
resolution, but there was a typographical error in the legal
description in the title and first paragraph of the resolution and
Hennepin County would not accept the resolution; and
WHEREAS, the attorney did not contact the City did not
tell the applicant of the problem; and
WHEREAS, it was not until last week when the applicant
was about to close on the selling of the other lot that this
problem came to light.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby grant an extension of
Resolution #91-72 for 180 days from the date of adoption of this
resolution.
125
May 28, 1991
REBOLUTION ~91-72
RESOLUTION TO ~PPROVE & KINOR BUBDIVIBION
FOR LOTB 11-14 & 20-23; BLOC~ 26 IN ~CHROOD ~I~ID
LOT 8; BLOCK 18; BETON
PID J24-117-24 1.4 0015~ 0046; 0057; 0052;
& J24-117-24 41 0163 & 0164; 4967 WlLBHIRE BLVD.
(P&Z CASE HO. 91-015)
RE~B the minor subdivision of Lots 12, 13, ~4,.2~
WHE ' .......... ~ ....d and Lot 8, Block ~u
2 of 11, Block 26 in wy~nwuv ,
21, 22, 23 & %/ ~. ...... --*~ 0057- 0052 & ~24-117-24.41
in Seton PID %247117-z~_l~_~u~D$_~...e~ re~,ired for platting
0163 & 0164, has been suDml=teo ~n ~= m~ .... =-
of land under City ~f Mound Ordinance code, Section 330 and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statute and all proceedings have
been duly conducted thereunder, and;
WHEREAB, an application to .waive the subdivision
requirements contained in Section 330 of the City Code has been
filed with the City of Mound, and;
WHERE~B, said request for waiver has been reviewed by the
Planning Commission and City Council, and;
WHEREAB, it. has be~n determined that there are special
circumstances affectln~ said property such that. the strict
application of the ~rd~nance would deprive ~he ~ppllcant of the
· his land; and that the waiver is necessary for
reasonable ~s? of .... ~ ..... ~ of a substantial property right;. ~gd
the reservation anu ~-jv~- .... '~ ntal to the puDllc
~P,~ant n~ the waiver would not be ~etr~-.~__
~.~. ~ .... i _. . ~ owner~.
welfare or injurious to the other proper y
NOR, THEREFORE, BE IT REBOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota:
1. (The request of the applicant for a waiver from the provisions
of Section 330 of the city code and the request to subdivide
property of less than five acres, legally described as
follows:
That part of Lots 12 and 13 lying Westerly of a line run
from a point in the South line of said LOt 12 distant 12 feet
east from the Southwest corner thereof to a point in the north
line of said LOt 13, distant 12 feet West from the Northeast
corner thereof; that part of Lot 23 lying Northerly of the
Southerly 30 feet thereof; Block 26, Wychwood.
126
Nay 28, 1991
That part of Lots 20, 21 and 22 lying Northerly of the
Southerly 30 feet except that part of said Lot 20 described as
follows:
Commencing at the Southwesterly corner of said Lot
20; thence North along the Westerly line of said Lot 20 a
distance of 45.1 feet; thence East along a line parallel
the South line of LOt 20,
to
a distance of 14 feet; thence South
along a line parallel to the West line of said Lot .20, a
distance of 45.1 feet; thence West along the South line of
said Lot 20, a distance of 14 feet to the point of beginning,
Block 26, Wychwood.
The West 1/2 of Lot 11, that part of Lot 12 lying
Easterly of the following described line; Beginning at a point
in the South line of said Lot 12, distant 12 feet from the
Southwesterly corner thereof; thence Northerly to a point in
the North line of LOt 13, and distant 12 feet Westerly from
the Northwesterly corner of said LOt 12; all that part of Lot
13 lyin? Easterly of the following described lin ' '
at a point in the North line of said -~* -~ ~-~' ~eglnnln~
~es~rly. ~rom the Northeast co- ..... n~nt 12 feet
~outneas=erly to a point in the South~ li~e~°~id ~n~
and distant 12 feet Easterly from the Southwesterly corner of
said Lot 12, all in Block 26, Wychwood.
All that part of LOt 8, Block 18, Seton, according to the
plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the
Registrar of Titles in and for said County, which lies West of
a line described as follows, to wit: Beginning at the most
Westerly point of Block 39, Wychwood; thence Northeasterly
along the Northwesterly line of said Block 39, a distance of
26.5 feet; thence North along a line drawn at right angles to
the Northerly line of said Lot 8, to its 1 ·
'ntersectlon with
said Northerly line of said LOt 8, to its intersection with
said Northerly line of said L?.t 8, thence West along the
Northerly line of said LOt 8 a distance of 72 feet to a point
which is the actual point of beginning of said line; thence
south and at right angles to the Northerly line of said Lot 8,
to the intersection of said line with the Southerly line of
said Lot 8, Lot 14, Block 26, "Wychwood.-
It is hereby granted to permit the subdivision as per the
following descriptions (see attached Exhibit 'A'):
PARCELS A & D [to be combined)i That part of Lots 20 and 21
lying Northerly of the Southerly 30 feet thereof except that
part of said Lot 20 described as follows: Commencing at the
Southwesterly corner of said Lot 20; thence North along the
127
May 28, 1991
stet1 line of said Lot 20, a distance of 45.1 feet;
We Y - - ..... ''-~ *o the South line of Lot
ence East along a line paru~=~ ~
. ,stance of feet; thence Sout . long a_
,v, .T P~ ........ . ~4-~ ~ said Lot 20, a ~lstance o£ ~.a
parallel to =ne ,e~ ~-,.- ~- South line of said LOt 20, a
f~et~ thence West along the
distance of 14 ~eet, to the point of beginning, Block 26,
Wychwood, according to the map or plat thereof in file or of
record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for
Hennepin County Minnesota.
Lot 13, Block 26, Wychwood.
Lot 14, Block 26, Wychwood.
All that part of LOt 8, Bl'ock 18, Se~on, according to the
thereof on file or of record in the o~fice of the
~-~-~ -, -itles in and for said County,_wh}ch. lies~W~
~ ~ line descr~De~ as zoz~owu,
~,~ Westerl~ po%~t .~thBw~rl~kneW~ns~l~UBl~=%~
Northeasterly along the No l~ne drawn at
a.distance of 26.5 feet; thence North along a
an les to the Northerly lin? of said LOt 8,. to its
right ~2 -,~= --4~ --rtherlv line of said Lot 8, thence
ersec~lon wlun
iht ..... -.--~--,-- line of said Lot 8 a ~ls~a~ce. oz
Wes~ g ......... ~---~ --~-t of beginning o
feet to a point
said line; thence South and at right angles to the Northerly
line of said Lot 8, to the intersection of said line with
the Southerly line of said Lot 8.
~ARCELS B & C (to be combined)~ The West 1/2 of LOt 11, all
of Lot 12, and that part of Luts 22 and 23 lying Northerly
of the Southerly 30 feet thereof. The East 50 feet of the
following described property: All that part of Lot 8, Block
18, Seton, according t the plat thereof on file or of record
in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said
County, which lies West of a line described as follows, to
wit: Beginning a the most Westerly point of Block 39,
Wychwood, thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line
of said Block 39, a distance of 26.5 feet; thence North
along a line drawn at right angles to the Northerly line of
said LOt 8, to its intersection with said Northerly line of
thence West along the Northerly line of said LOt
said LOt 8;
8 a distance of 72 feet to a point which is the actual point
South and at right angles
of beginning of said line; thence
to the Northerly line of said LOt 8, to the intersection of
said line with the Southerly line of said Lot 8.
Upon the following conditions:
128
May 28, 1991
a)
The applicant shall combine Parcels A and D and shall
also combine Parcels B and C.
b)
c)
The applicant shall either remove a portion of the deck
on the west side of the existing home or relocate the
lot line separating parcels A and B in order to create
a two foot distance between the property line and the
edge of the deck. If the applicant elects to relocate
the lot line, a new survey and corresponding legal
descriptions will need to be submitted to the City of
Mound prior to the filing of the subdivision with
Hennepin County.
A 5.5 foot variance is hereby issued for the existing
front yard setback for the existing structure on Parcel
B with the clear and express understanding that the use
remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all
of the provisions and restrictions of the Mound Zoning
Code.
3. It is determined that the foregoing subdivision will
constitute a desirable and stable community development and
it is in harmony with adjacent properties.
4. The City Clerk is authorized to deliver a certified copy of
this resolution to the applicant. The applicant shall have
the responsibility for filing this resolution in the office
of the Register of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles of
Hennepin County to show compliance with the subdivision
regulations of the City. The applicant shall also have the
responsibility of paying all costs for such recording.
5. This lot subdivision is to be filed and recorded within 180
days of the adoption date of this resolution.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Ahrens and seconded by Councilmember Jensen.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Ahrens, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
Then~owing Councilmemb~vote lin~ negative:
Attest: -
City Clerk
RESOLUTION t91-72
KXH[I, IT
..... 129 '
Hay 28, 1991
EMERALD LAKE
D
(COURTY ROAD NO. 125)
/
1
/
/
COFFIN & GRONBER~ INC.
LONG LAKF. IIW4WE $OTA
)fXHUTE~ OF A KEE?XM(~ OF THE
MOUND ADVTBORy PLAI~I~ COI4NIBSIOM
MAy 13, 1991
ase o. - oma els 4g W shire vd t
13 & sc · n Sets and o
6 W we 2 - - O0 5 0 0
$ 0 $ NO 8UBD VIS! N
The Building Official reviewed the City Planner's report. The
applicant is seekinq approval of a minor subdivision to create
two lots, both of which will have detached lakeshore separated by
Wilshire Blvd. Both parcels will meet the minimum lot area
requirement of 6,000 sc~are feet; Parcel A will be 15,326 square
feet, and Parcel B will be 14,821 square feet. Parcel A contains
an existing structure and Parcel B is a vacant lot.
In addition to Parcels A and B, the parcel on the north side of
Wilshire Blvd. will be divided into two parcels as follows: Par-
cel C will be 2,280 square feet, and Parcel D will be 4,860
square feet.
The applicant plans to have Parcels A and D combined and Parcels
B and C combined resultinq in two building sites with detached,
deeded lakeshore.
Parcel B presently has a driveway access off of Briqhton Blvd.
It is assumed that Parcel A will have a similar driveway con-
figuration since the front of the property on Wilshire contains a
steep slope. Wilshire is also a County road necessitating the
issuance of a driveway permit from Hennepin County.
Staff recommended approval of the minor subdivision contingent
upon the following conditipns:
1. The applicant shall combine parcels A and D and shall also
combine parcels B and C.
2. The applicant shall either remove a portion of the deck on
the west side of the existing home or relocate the lot line
separating Parcels A and B in order to create a two foot
stance between the property line and the edge of the deck.
the applicant elects to relocate the lot line, a new sur-
vey and corresponding legal descriptions will need to be
submitted to the City of Mound prior to the filing of the
subdivision with Hennepin County.
3. A 5.5 foot variance is hereby issued for the existing front
yard setback for the existing structure on Parcel B with the
clear and express understanding that the use remains as a
lawful, nonconforming use, sttbject to all of the provisions
and restrictions of the Mound Zoning Code.
The applicant informed the Commission that he will be cutting the
deck back to meet the required 2 foot setback.
The Commission expressed that they do not wish to see this
property subdivided again in the future. The applicant explained
that due to an access prcblem, it would be difficult to create
another parcel from this subdivision. The1 confirmed that
proposed Parcels C & D cannot have buildings constructed on them.
MOTION made by Michael, seconded by Menus to approve
staff,s recommendation for approval, contingent upon tho
conditions listed. Motion carried unanimously.
This case will be heard by the City Council on May 28, 1991.
VanDoren
Hazard
Stallings, Inc.
Architects ® EnQineere · I~lemners
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Mound Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner ~
DATE: May 6, 1991
SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision
APPLICANT: Thomas Nichols
CASE NUMBER: 91-015
VHS FILE NUMBER: 91-310-A9-ZO
LOCATION: 4967 Wilshire Boulevard
EXISTING ZONING: Single Family Residential (R-2)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking approval of a minor
subdivision to create two lots, both of which will have detached
lakeshore separated by Wilshire Boulevard. At the present'time,
the property consists of five parcels, four south of Wilshire and
one abutting Emerald Lake on the north side of Wilshire. Under the
current proposal, the diagonal lot line that bisects Lots 12 and 13
will be reoriented to establish two parcels with the following
characteristics:
Parcel A: 15,326 square feet (Formerly Lots 13, 14, 20 & 21)
Parcel B: 14,821 square feet (Formerly Lots 12, 11pt, 22 & 23)
Parcel A contains an existing structure and Parcel B represents a
vacant lot. In addition to the two home sites, the parcel on the
north side of Wilshire Boulevard will be divided into two parcels
with the following characteristics:
Parcel C: 2,280 square feet
Parcel D: 4,860 square feet
Upon approval of the subdivision, plans call for parcels A and D to
be combined and parcels B and C will also be combined resulting in
two building sites with detached, deeded lakeshore.
3030 Harbor Lane North, Bldg. II, Suite 104, Minneapolis Minnesota 55447-2175 (612) 553-1950
Nichols Planning Report
May 6, 1991
Page Two
Section 330:20 of the Mound Code of Ordinances defines minor
subdivisions as those creating not more than three lots.
Technically, this request creates four lots, however, since it is
the applicant's intent to combine the fOur lots to create two home
sites, this application is being reviewed as a minor subdivision
request.
COMMENT: The subject property is located in the R-2 zone which
requires 6,000 square feet of total lot area. Both of the proposed
parcels surpass the required minimum lot area and also exceed the
lot width requirements. The existing residence that is located on
proposed Parcel B has a 14.5 foot front yard setback. The Mound
Zoning Code requires a 20 foot front yard setback necessitating the
recognition of an existing 5.5 foot front yard variance.
Additionally, the current house has an on-grade deck located on the
west side of the structure that appears to be less than the
required two foot side yard setback for such decks. The deck
variance could be omitted by either modifying the existing
structure or moving the common lot line between Parcels A and B to
accommodate the required setback.
Parcel B presently has a driveway access off of Brighton Boulevard.
It is assumed- that Parcel A will have a similar driveway
configuration since the front of the property on Wilshire contains
a steep slope. Wilshire is also a county road necessitating the
issuance of a driveway permit from Hennepin County.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision
contingent upon the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall combine parcels A and D and shall also
combine parcels B and C.
2. The applicant shall either remove a portion of the deck on the
west side of the existing home or relocate the lot line
separating Parcels A and B in order to create a two foot
distance between the property line and the edge of the deck.
If the applicant elects to relocate the lot line, a new survey
and corresponding legal descriptions will need to be submitted
to the City of Mound prior to the filing of the subdivision
with Hennepin County.
3. A 5.5 foot variance is hereby issued for the existing front
yard setback for the existing structure on Parcel B with the
clear and express understanding that the use remains as a
lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions
and restrictions of the Mound Zoning Code.
NICHSUB.P51
c~,'n, OF NOUND
FEES~
I ~ CI~Y OFMOUND_ _l. o~ u=
Hlnor Subdivl s Ion
App 1 t cat I on $ 5 0
Park Ded.
Other
Delinquent Taxes? yes / no
Major Subdivision=
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
Escrow Deposit
Park Dedication
Other , ~.
(Please type or print the following Informatll~n~)
^pp, ,cant's Nama-rgOt4~ ~1~
$150
$~0o
$1~000
Day Phone~'~. ~
Fee Owner(s)
pr Int name
~¥1~v'l Wll~etll:~ I~l.~l~
ma I i tng address
Signature oF Fee Owner
pr tnt name
ma!ling address
~_~g'nal:ure oF FeeTOwner
This application must be signed by all the O~NERS of the property, or an
explanation given why this Is not the case.
Property to be divided=
Address/Location
Addltlon~~L~/~
Lot
Block. '~' PID #
To be dtvtded as Follows=,
Name oF proposed subdivision:
Existing Use oF Property:
Zoning District:_ F
Lb~ I~
~ | ! cat I on for Iu~ I v ! $ i on
Page
Cgse No,~~~.~
an application ever been made for zoning, variance, c tlonal use
permit, or other zoo lng procedure For this property? ~ IF yes,
list date(s) oF apPlication, action taken, and provide reso,n number(s)
(Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.).
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained In
any required Papers or Plans to be submitted herewith are true and
curate. I consent to the entry In or upon the premises described tn this
application by any authorized official of the City of Mound For the purpose
of Inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may
be required by law.
Dar
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
annlng Commission Recommendation
Council Action:
Date
Resolution No.
Date
WI"LUI"I I~'L; O0~-/D/D t*lc~F L.ID,~/ .L-/ ;U~; ~t0 .UU.7
RSSOLU?ION NO.
RESOLUTION DENYING THE APPLICATION OF JAMES SHARP
AND JOSEPHIN£ SHARP FOR A VARIANCE POE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 4925 GLEN ELYN ROAD
WHEREAS, Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes authorizes the City
Council, with the aid and 'assiStance Of the City Planning Commission to
carry out municipal planning activities which guide the future development
and improvement of the community, and
WHEREAS, James J. and Josephine A. Sharp of Los Angeles, California,
acquired Lot 22, Block 24, Shadywood Point, by acquiring a tax forfeit deed
on July 13, 1960, and
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Sharp applied for a lot area variance on April
1987, because Lot 22 contains approximately 5120 square feet of land and
Section 23.604.5 of the Mound zoning code requires 10,000 square feet of lot
area in this zoning district, and
WHEREAS, Section 23.403 of the City zoning code indicates that a lot of
record in a residential development may be used for single family detached
dwelling purposes provided the area of the lot meets set-back and minimum
lot area requirements, and Lot 22, Block 24, Shadywood Point, does not meet
those requirements, and
WHEREAS, in 1987 the matfer was reviewed by the City Planner, the
Planning CommJssion, and the City Council, and the general application for
a variance was denied, and
WHEREAS, a Dennis Zylla has filed a variance application under date of
October 19, 1991, and has appeared before the P~anning Commission and the
City Council and has indicated that the purpose of his request is to have the
City Council declare the.lot a buildable site, and he and the Sharps have not
presented any building plan or other details for a proposed home
construction or other use which would allow the City staff and Planning
Commission and the City Council to review the application and to determine
if it qualifies for a variance under Section 23.506 of the City zoning code,
and
W~EREAS, Section 23.506 sets forth the criteria for granting
variances and the procedure which is to be followed in such an application,
including the requirement that the applicant provide the location and
dimensions of the lot, the building or proposed building, driveTways, and
off-street parking spaces, and further requiring that the applicant show
distance between the building and the front lot line, s~de lot lines, and
rear lot line, and the location of the proposed principal build
accessory buildings {ng and
, and also requires the applicant to locate przncipal
buildings on adjacent properties, and
WHEREAS, the City Council is authorized to grant a variance to the
provisions of the zoning ordinance if they find exceptional or
extraordinary circumstances a~ply to that particular property, which do
not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, and
that these unusual circumstances or uniqueness results from lot size or
shape, configuration problems, topographic or other circumstances over
which the owners of the property have no control, and
WHEREAS, the criteria also requires that there be special conditions
or circumstances which do not result from actions of the applicant, and that
the variance requested is a minimum variance which would allevitate the
hardship, and further that the variance requested would not materially be
detrimental to the purposes of the ordinance or the properties in the same
area, and
WHEREAS, Mr. Zylla acting on behalf of the Sharps, indicated to the
Planning Commission and to the City Council that he wanted them to declare
the lot buildable and he did not see the relevance of having to supply any
information relating to a proposed plan or request for a building permit on
the property, and Mr. Zylla was present at a City Council meeting held on
December 10, 1991, at which time the Mayor asked the City Attorney if it was
necessary that there be a specific plan before the Council for their
consideration, and it was the opinion of the City Attorney that a plan
incorporating the request for a variance include information which would
allow the City Council to act upon the request for a variance, and if the
Council were going to grant it, to impose certain conditions to protect
other properties in the area, and
WHEREAS, the applicant's piece of property is legally described as Lot
22, Block 24, Shadywood Point, has 5124 square feet in an R-1 zone, and
requires a 4880 square foot variance from the City's lot requirements, and
WHEREAS, residents of the neighborhood have publicly and privately
advised Zylla and the Sharps that they have an interest in acquiring the
property and adding it to adjacent properties to enlarge those lots and to
bring them into conformance with the zoning ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the Sharps acquired this property in 1960 as tax-forfeited
land and took such property subject to the then existing zoning ordinance of
the City of Mound, and the property jacket for the property indicates that
on April 14, 1965, Helen Newell, who was then the City Assessor, wrote to
James J. Sharp at 1200 North Avenue, Los Angeles CA, concerning an apparent
inquiry from him on Lots 18, 19, and 22, Block 24, Shadywood Point, wherein
she explained the public improvement and assessment project for the
construction of sanitary sewer in the area, and
WHEREAS, Ms. Newell pointed out that Lots 18 and 19, being contiguous
to each other, and being considered as one buildable site, were assessed as
one unit, and stated further:
"Single lots where adjacent lots were under other ownership were
also charged one unit with the understanding that in these cases an
application for a building permit would be considered by the Board of
Zoning Appeals (Planning Commission) providing all other
requirements were met."
and
WHEREAS, in spite of the warning by the City Council on December 10,
1991, Mr. Zylla and the Sharps have not presented sufficient materials to
the City Council to act on a request for a specific variance on this
property, and at a City Council meeting on February 11, 1992, Mr. Zylla
again appeared before the City Council and indicated that he wanted the
Council to declare the lot buildable or unbuildable and did not see the
necessity for providing specific information, and he further stated that
the Planning Commission had never asked for a building plan and he did not
feel that a building plan was necessary, and he further indicated to the
Council that he had talked to a realtor who indicated that it would be
difficult to sell the lot if the buyer had to apply for a variance, but
members of the Council pointed out to Mr. Zylla that a large amount of real
estate is sold subject to conditions and contingencies, including the
necessity to obtain governmental permits, and
WHEREAS, the City Council specifically indicated to Mr. Zylla on
behalf of the Sharps that they were not ruling on whether a variance would be
granted if they had a specific plan before them, but that on Mr. Zylla's
specific request that the property be declared buildable, they were not
going to take that action and therefore were going to deny his request for a
variance and further directed the City staff to prepare a denial of the
variance request setting forth the facts and the Council's findings,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of
Mound, as follows:
1. The application of Dennis Zylla on behalf of James and Josephine
Sharp is hereby denied for the following reasons:
a. The applicants have failed to provide the information
requested by the City Council so the City Council can ascertain
whether a variance should be granted.
b. The applicants have indicated that they only want one
determination from the City Council and that is whether the lot is
buildable or unbuildable, and this limits the City Council and their
ability to consider the effect of such a declaratiom on adjacent
properties and also limits them from placing conditions or other
requirements on any permit.
c. A declaration by the City Council that a lot which is 4880
feet deficient of lot size requirements with a general statement that
it is buildable would create a problem for any future buyer who would
purchase the property and then find that whatever plan was submitted
may or may not meet the requirements of the City and would probably
have to be submitted to the Planning Commission and to the City Council
for their review and consideration.
d. The City does not believe that it is confiscating the
property rights of Mr. and Mrs. Sharp nor are they depriving the
property of all its value, since there have been a large number of
people from the neighborhood who have appeared and have indicated that
they have an interest in purchasing the land to add it to other
properties in the neighborhood and to do away with non-conforming
situations which exist in this old platted area.
e. The Council finds that the Whereas provisions of this
Resolution accurately set forth its findings of the facts in this case
and incorporates said findings as a part of this resolution of denial.
2. The City Council has by the adoption of Subdivision and Zoning
ordinances laid out a procedure for the development of the City in such a
manner that improvements and growth and development and redevelopment
projects will be done as efficiently as possible and will result in a
minimum expenditure of public monies to work around unusual developments.
The City Council also recognizes that non-conforming uses and non-
conforming lot situations exist in the City of Mound as a result of old
platting standards, and the City Council needs to protect the property
rights of people who own these small previously platted lots. The City
also has as a goal of the zoning ordinance the removal of non-conforming
situations by the combination of lots or by bringing structures and other
non-conforming circumstances into conformity with the new regulations in
existence in the City.
3. The City Council states to Mr. and Mrs. Sharp and to Mr. Zylla and
to anyone else reviewing this resolution setting forth the findings of the
Council that the Council specifically has not denied the applicants the use
of their property but is denying the request of Mr. Zylla on behalf of the
Sharps that they declare the lot buildable or unbuildable. The City
Planning Commission and the City Council are fully aware of the
constitutional requirements protecting private property, and intend to
continue to work toward the goal of bringing non-conforming properties into
comformance with the current and existing regulations without depriving
people of their property rights without due process of law.
4. The City Council further finds that if a request by a property
owner to state that any property which was of record at any time in the past
must be granted a classification of 'buildable", then the Planning
Commission and the City Council will have lost complete control over the
development or redevelopment of the City and the purpose and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance and the stated goals to bring
properties into conformance with the City's existing standards will be
lost. The City Council continues to strive to bring all properties into
conformance at some time in the future.
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
March 11, 1992
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT: City of Mound, Minnesota
1992 Lift Station Improvement Project
Contract Award
MFRA #9868
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
On March 6, 1992, bids were opened and read aloud for the subject project.
Seven bids were received and the bid tabulation for those bids is enclosed.
The low bidder is Gridor Construction, Inc., with a total base bid of
$207,600.00. We have carefully checked the proposal and find that it is
correct.
Telephone Engineers
612/476-6010 Plan hers
612/476-8532 FAX Surveyors
The low bid, as noted above, gives a total cost for the project of
$207,600.00, as compared to, the Engineer's Estimate of $203,500 00, as state
~n the Preliminary Engineer s Reoort ~ ........... ' d
.... ~=u u~uemoer Az, 19~. The $203,500.00
includes 10% contingencies which were included in the preliminary report to
cover unforeseen circumstances that might show up later in the final design and
construction. However, since December, 1988, construction costs have increased
approximately 7.7%; therefore, our estimate in March, 1992 was $219,200.00,
including 10% contingencies. Therefore, we feel that Gridor's bid is
acceptable.
We have also reviewed with Oreg Skinner, the alternates contained in the
bid proposal. Alternates A through E were submitted for ABS pumps in lieu of
the base bid for Hydromatic Pumps. Alternate A for Lift Station A2, which is
the only dry station of the five, was bid with an increase of $2,100.00 if ABS
pumps were used. The other four stations are wet stations and all show a
deduct if ABS pumps are used. We are satisfied that ABS has met the
specifications and, therefore, are recommending that the City accept Alternates
B through E which results in a total deduct of $11,800.00.
We have worked with Gridor Construction on other municipal projects and do
not hesitate to recommend awarding them this contract. If the Council approves
using the aforementioned alternates, the base bid of $207,600.00 would be
reduced by $11,800, resulting in a contract price of $195,800.00.
Very truly yours,
JC:jmj
Enclosures
McCOMBS FRANK R00S ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Cameron
An Equal Opportunity Employer
BID TAB
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
1992 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
M_n'p~ #9868
GRIDOR CONSTRUCTION, INC.
1. Base Bid for Lift Station A2
2. Base Bid for Lift Station Bi
3. Base Bid for Lift Station C5
4. Base Bid for Lift Station D3
5. Base Bid for Lift Station R1
TOTAL BASE BID
1. Alternate A - Lift Station A2 - Add
2. Alternate B - Lift Station BI - Deduct
3. Alternate C - Lift Station C5 - Deduct
Alternate D - Lift Station D3 - Deduct
5. Alternate E - Lift Station R1 - Deduct
6. Alternate F - Lift Station A2 - Add
7. Alternate G - Lift Station B1 - Add
8. Alternate H - Lift Station C5 - Add
9. Alternate I - Lift Station D3 - Add
lO. Alternate J - Lift Station RI - Add
11. Alternate K - Lift Station B1 - Add
12. Alternate L - Lift Station Ri - Add
OILBERT MECHANICAL, INC.
1. Base Bid for Lift Station A2
2. Base Bid for Lift Station B!
3. Base Bid for Lift Station C5
4. Base Bid for Lift Station D3
5. Base Bid for Lift Station R1
TOTAL BASE BID
1. Alternate A - Lift Station A2 - Add
2. Alternate B - Lift Station BI - Deduct
3. Alternate C - Lift Station C5 - Deduct
Alternate D - Lift Station D3 - Deduct
5. Alternate E - Lift Station R1 - Deduct
6. Alternate F - Lift Station A2 - Add
7. Alternate G - Lift Station B1 - Add
8. Alternate H - Lift Station C5 - Deduct
9. Alternate I - Lift Station D3 - Add
10. Alternate J - Lift Station R1 - Add
11. Alternate K - Lift Station B1 - Deduct
12. Alternate L - Lift Station R! - Deduct
47,800.00
40,000.00
4O,lOO.OO
40,800.00
38,900.00
2,100.00
2,TOO.OO
2,600.00
2,600.00
3,900.00
$ 3,000.00
$ 3,000.00
$ 3,000.00
$ 3,000.00
$ 3,000.00
$ 600.00
$ 3,700.00
$ q9,137.00
$ 41,810.00
$ 41,563.00
$ 38,162.00
$ 42,187.00
$ 212,859.00
1,70q.00
2,187.00
2,090.00
2,090.00
3,167.00
$ 31o.oo
$ 2,505.00
$ 100.00
$ 1,980.00
$ 1,460.00
$ 3,600.00
$ 2,600.00
LaTOUR CONSTI{UCTION, INC~
1. Base Bid for Lift Station A2
2. Base Bid for Lift Station Bi
3. Base Bid for Lift Station C5
Base Bid for Lift Station D3
5. Base Bid for Lift Station Ri
TOTAL BASE BID
1. Alternate A - Lift Station A2 - Add
2. Alternate B - Lift Station B1 - Deduct
3. Alternate C - Lift Station C5 - Deduct
Alternate D - Lift Station D3 - Deduct
5. Alternate E - Lift Station R1 - Deduct
6. Alternate F - Lift Station A2
7. Alternate G - Lift Station Bi
8. Alternate H - Lift Station C5
9. Alternate I - Lift Station D3
10. Alternate J - Lift Station Ri
11. Alternate K - Lift Station Bi - Add
12. Alternate L - Lift Station R1 - Add
PENN CONTRACTING, INC.
1. Base Bid for Lift Station A2
2. Base Bid for Lift Station Bi
3. Base Bid for Lift Station C5
4. Base Bid for Lift Station D3
5. Base Bid for Lift Station R1
TOTAL BASE BID
1. Alternate A - Lift Station A2 - Add
2. Alternate B - Lift Station B! - Deduct
3. Alternate C - Lift Station C5 - Deduct
Alternate D - Lift Station D3 - Deduct
5. Alternate E - Lift Station R1 - Deduct
6. Alternate F - Lift Station A2 - Add
7. Alternate G - Lift Station B1 - Add
8. Alternate H - Lift Station C5 - Add
9. Alternate I - Lift Station D3 - Add
10. Alternate j - Lift Station RI - Add
11. Alternate K - Lift Station Bi - Deduct
12. Alternate L - Lift Station RI - Add
$ 49,425.00
$ 40,570.00
$ 44,500.00
$ 40,400.00
$ 43,090.00
1,985.00
2,545.00
2,435.00
2,435.00
3,690.00
$ 0. O0
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 810.00
$ 1,260.00
49,511.00
43,4O4.00
43,256.00
40,219.00
43,996.00
3,ooo.oo
5oo.oo
5oo.oo
5oo.oo
5oo.oo
$ 8,000.00
$ 8,000.00
$ 8,ooo.oo
$ 8,000.00
$ 8,000.O0
$ 100.00
$ 2,000.00
NORTHWEST MECHANICAL, INC.
1. Base Bid for Lift Station A2
2. Base Bid for Lift Station Bi
3. Base Bid for Lift Station C5
4. Base Bid for Lift Station D3
5- Base Bid for Lift Station RI
TOTAL BASE BID
1. Alternate A - Lift Station A2 - Add
2. Alternate B - Lift Station B1 - Deduct
3. Alternate C - Lift Station C5 - Deduct
4. Alternate D - Lift Station D3 - Deduct
5. Alternate E - Lift Station R1 - Deduct
6. Alternate F - Lift Station A2
7. Alternate G - Lift Station B!
8. Alternate H - Lift Station C5
9. Alternate I - Lift Station D3
10. Alternate J - Lift Station R1
11. Alternate K - Lift Station B1 - Deduct
12. Alternate L - Lift Station Ri - Deduct
RICE LAKE CONTRACTING CORP.
1. Base Bid for Lift Station A2
2. Base Bid for Lift Station B1
3. Base Bid for Lift Station C5
4. Base Bid for Lift Station D3
5. Base Bid for Lift Station RI
TOTAL BASE BID
1. Alternate A - Lift Station A2 - Add
2. Alternate B - Lift Station BI - Deduct
3. Alternate C - Lift Station C5 - Deduct
Alternate D - Lift Station D3 - Deduct
5. Alternate E - Lift Station Ri - Deduct
6. Alternate F - Lift Station A2 - Add
7. Alternate G - Lift Station B1 - Add
8. Alternate H - Lift Station C5 - Add
9. Alternate I - Lift Station D3 - Add
10. Alternate J - Lift Station RI - Add
11. Alternate K - Lift Station Bi - Deduct
12. Alternate L - Lift Station R1 - Deduct
49,200.00
43,200.00
44,200.00
38,60O.O0
43,600.00
218,80o.00
$ 1,700.00
$ 1,500.00
$ 1,500.00
$ 1,500.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 1,200.00
$ 1,200.00
$ 50,50o.00
$ 48,0oo.oo
$ 48,ooo.0o
$ 46,300.00
$ 49,000.00
$ 241,800.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 3,000.OO
$ 50,000.00
$ 50,00O.00
$ 50,000.00
$ 50,000.00
$ 50,000.O0
$ 1,000.00
$ lO0.O0
BAHBAHOSSA AND SONS, INCo
1. Base Bid for Lift Station A2
2. Base Bid for Lift Station Bi
Base Bid for Lift Station C5
4. Base Bid for Lift Station D3
5. Base Bid for Lift Station Ri
TOTAL BASE BID
1. Alternate A - Lift Station A2 - Add
2. Alternate B - Lift Station Bi - Deduct
3. Alternate C - Lift Station C5 - Deduct
Alternate D - Lift Station D3 - Deduct
5. Alternate E - Lift Station R! - Deduct
6. Alternate F - Lift Station A2 - Add
7. Alternate G - Lift Station B1 - Add
8. Alternate H - Lift Station C5 - Add
9. Alternate I - Lift Station D3 - Add
10. Alternate J - Lift Station Ri - Add
11. Alternate K - Lift Station B1 - Add
12. Alternate L - Lift Station R1 - Add
$ 77,0oo.oo
$ 74,000.00
$ 78,000.00
$ 72,000.00
$ 71,000.00
$ 1,200.00
$ 1,200.00
$ 1,200.00
$ 1,200.00
$ 1,200.00
1,5oo.oo
3,000.00
$ 1,500.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 3,000.00
3O
February 25, 1992
follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE A WARRANTy DEED TO SELL CITY PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the City of Mound owns property described as
The Northwesterly 35 feet of the Southwesterly 5 feet of Lot
5;
The Northwesterly 35 feet of Lot 6;
The Northwesterly 35 feet of LOt 7;
The Northeasterly 15 feet of the Northwesterly 22 feet of LOt
8;
The Northeasterly 15 feet of Lots 10 & 11;
The Southeasterly 67 feet of Lot 14;
The Southeasterly 67 feet and that part of the Northeasterly
20 feet lying Northwesterly of the Southeasterly 67 feet of
Lot 15;
The Southeasterly 5 feet of Lot 16;
All in Block 8 of Avalon; and
into - -- .W~EREA~_, in November of 1991, the City Council
a murcnase Agreement with Turnquist Properties, Inc. entered
the above described property for $20,000.00. to sell
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council o
the City of Mound, Minnesota_ doe .
Sity Manager to execute = ~,~-__~ ~ere~y authorize the f
Inc. ~ -a£run= De . Mayor and
for $20,000.00 eel ',- ~^ ~_¥. ~d to Turnqulst p n~__
, 11..~ ~,= ~o~lowln~ d~~_~ ~._ ro~=~,
= ~muu Ulty property:
Th~;Northwesterly 35 feet of the Southwesterly 5 feet of ~t
The Northwesterly 35 feet of Lot 6;
The Northwesterly 35 feet of Lot 7;
The Northeasterly 15 feet of the Northwesterly 22 feet of Lot
8;
The Northeasterly 15 feet of Lots 10 & 11;
The Southeasterly 67 feet of Lot 14;
The Southeasterly 67 feet and that part of the Northeasterl
20 feet lying Northwesterly of the ...... Y
Lot 15; oou=neas=erly 67 feet of
The Southeasterly 5 feet of Lot 16;
All in Block 8 of Avalon; and
A. THOMAS WURST. P.A.
CufqTm$ A. pEARSON.
~HOMAS ~- UNDERW~D, P.A.
ROGER d- F~LLOW$
LAW OFFICES
WURST, PEARSON, L. ARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ
II00 FIRST BANK PLACE wEST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5540~'
b~rch 3, 1992
tVL~. ~'an Clark, City Clerk
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Mq 55364
Re: Sale of Land to Turnquist Properties,
Enclosed for execution by the City are the following docxm~-nts in connection
with the above transaction:
1. Warranty Deed to be signed by the Mayor and City Manager, with
signatures to be notarized as provided.
2. Affidavit to be signed by the City ymnager, with signature to
be notarized.
When returning the enclosed to mm, please also include doctm~tation concerning
closure of well as called for in the Addend~xn to the Purchase Agreen~nt.
Please let m~ know if there are any questions.
Very t~fl~ yo~urs, ~
/Thomas F. Underwood
Enclosures
~ent taxes and transfer entered;
of Real Estate Value ( ) flied ( ) not requited
Cert~te of Real E~tate Value No._
---------- ,19.______ --
County Auditor
by
Deputy
STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ 66.00
DaW:
(re~rved for recording data)
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, C__~ity of Mound
tor, hereby conveys~-~d w laws o~
_ pm --' under the laws of_ lVl~ , Grantee, a
_County, Minnesota, desc~bed as follows: , rea] property in
The Nor:l~/esCerly 35 £eer of the Souuh~escerly 5 leer of I~c 5;
The Northwesterly 35 leer o£ Loc 6;
The Nor:h~esterly 35 feec of LoC 7;
The Nor:heasCerly 15 feet of the NorCh~scerly 22 £eec o£ I~c 8;
The ~brCheascerly 15 feet o£ Lots 10 and 11;
The Soucheascerly 67 £eec of Lot 14;
~ ~e ~ouuneasterly 67 leer o_6 Loc 15; '~
The Southeasterly 5 feec of LoC 16;
A~l tn Block 8 of Avalon,(ifm°res~eceisneecled. continue on back{
together with aU ·
heredx?am, en.~ and appurtenances belonging thereto subject to
Reservatic~s, resct:r]~ccza~, easaaents and covenants o~ record, the following exceptions:
££ any.
Affix De,,d Tax Stamp Itore
STATE OF MINNESOTA
1 '"
The foregoing was acknowledged before me
by ~ b'~c~ thia
under the laws of ~
I~m~{~TZ O {y (NAM{ AND ADDIEU{)
Thomas F. Unde:~ood
I';uzsc, Pearson, La. son, Underwood & rtz
1100 FJ~-st Bank Place
Minneapolis, ~ 55402
By_
It, Pavg~
By
........................ --L_L _ '
State of Minnesota,
County of ~
Affidavit Regarding Corporation
being first duly sworn, on oath say(s) that~
1.:~1///~/~) (__he is) the ~er
respectively, of ~City of ~ a FSnnesota ~n~Acipa~--- corporation, ~e co~ra~on
~ ~ ~ the d~u~nt
19~
nam~ as ~ ~ , ~ and fil~ for r~ord
da~ (or in ~k of
as D~ument No._ ~ .) in the Office of the (~unty ~corder) (~s~ar of ~tles) of
Page .._ County, Minneso~.
2. Said ~ration's p~ncipal pla~ of business is at
and
prs~ou~ p~P~ place(s) of business during ~e past ~n years
~ ~ ~e
3. There have been no: ..... id cot-~rati°n during the time said corp-
a. Bankruptcy or dissolution proceeamgs ~nvoivmg sa ~-~ ,, - ,,
oration has had any interest in the premises described in the above document ( Premises );
b. Unsatisfied judgments of record against said corporation nor any actions pending in any
courts, which affect the Premises;
c. Tax liens filed against said corporation;
except as herein stated:
4. Any bankruptcy or dissolution proceedings of record against corporations with the same or similar
names, during the time period in which the above named corporation had any interest in the Premises,
are not against the above named corporation.
5. Any judgments or tax liens of record against corporations with the same or similar names are no~
against the above named corporation.
6. There has been no labor or materials furnished to the Premises for which payment has not been
made.
7. There are no unrecorded contracts, leases, easements or other agreements or interests relating to
the Premises except as stated herein:
8. There are no persons in possession of any portion of the Premises other than pursuant to a recorded
document except as stated herein:
9. There are no encroachments or boundary line questions affecting the Premises of which Affiant(s)
(has) (Imo~ knowledge.
Affiant(s) know(s) the matters herein stated are true and make(s) this Affidavit for the purpose of
inducing the passing of title to the Premises.
Edward J. Shukle
Subscribed and sworn to before me
199~.
this ~ day of
Thozas F. Underwood
i 1100 First Bank Place West
I Mirmeapolis, b~q 55402
siGN ATU i~£ O1.' N OTA II ¥ Pt'B LIC Oa OTM EE O~ I"1_~ I)_L_
"- ~0TkS~AL STAMP OS SEAL qOE OTHER TITLE O1~ IL~NKI
RESOLUTION #92-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, the minor subdivision of part of Lot 16, Block
14, Arden, has been submitted in the manner required for platting
of land under City of Mound Ordinance Code, Section 330 and under
Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statute; and
WHEREAS, an application to waive the subdivision
requirements contained in Section 330 of the City Code has been
filed with the City of Mound, and;
WHEREAS, said request for waiver has been reviewed by the
City Council, and;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that there are special
circumstances affecting said property such that the strict
application of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of the
reasonable use of his land; and that the waiver is necessary for
the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; and
that granting the waiver would not be detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the other property owners.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota:
The request of the applicant for a waiver from the provisions
of Section 330 of the City Code and the request to subdivide
property of less than five acres, legally described as
follows:
PARCEL A: That part of Lot 16, Block 14, Arden, according to
the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, lying southerly of the following
described line:
Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot
16; thence in a southeasterly direction to the
southeast corner of said Lot 16, and said line
there terminating.
PARCEL E: That part of Lot 16, Block 14, Arden, according to
the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, lying easterly of the west 30.00 feet of
said Lot 16 and southerly of the following
described line:
Beginning at the northwest corner of said Lot
16; thence in a southeasterly direction to the
southeast corner of said Lot 16, and said line
there terminating.
Upon the following conditions:
a)
The applicant shall combine Parcels B with PID #24-117-24
44 0171.
It is determined that the foregoing subdivision will
constitute a desirable and stable community development and it
is in harmony with adjacent properties.
The City Clerk is authorized to deliver a certified copy of
this resolution to the applicant. The owner of PID #24-117-24
44 0171 shall have the responsibility for filing this
resolution in the office of the Register of Deeds or the
Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County to show compliance with
the subdivision regulations of the City. The owner of PID
#24-117-24 44 0171 shall also have the responsibility of
paying all costs for such recording.
This lot subdivision is to be filed and recorded within 180
days of the adoption date of this resolution.
March 9, 1992
LICENSE RENEWAL -- EXPIRE APRIL 1, 1992. New License Period
4-2-92 to 4-1-93. Approval contingent upon
all required forms, insurance, etc. being
turned in.
TREE REMOVAL
Aaspen Tree Service
Emery's Tree Service
Shorewood Tree Service
Robert F. Dahlke
Eklunds Tree Service
Lutz Tree Service
HAWKER/FOOD VENDOR
Blue Bell Ice Cream
COMMERCIAL DOCK
A1 & Alma's Supper Club - 24 Slips in Water
Chapman Place Assoc. - 27 Slips in Water
Boat Rental of Minnetonka, Inc. - 24 Slips in Water
18 Boats Stored on Land
BILLS .MARCH 11, 1992
BATCH
BATCH
2023
2024
TOTAL BILLS
$145,557.97
116,978.52
$262,536.49
Z
0
0,. I=...
z
L~
::3
Z
Z
°1
I I '1 I
I I ;I
Z
Z
Y
0
0
zz~zz~
ooo0op
ii
0
0
§
NOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
MOUND, NINNESOTA
FOR MONTH OF ~'I~P. gI~A~y lqq2
FIRE FIGHTERS DRILLS & MAINTENANCE FIRE & RESCUE
2 ~ ~ X X 2 19.~ 3 i9 6.~ 114.~
3 ~y ~B X x 2 19.~ 0 17 6.~ 102.~
4 DAV~ ~ X X 2 19.~ 2 1} 6.~ 114.~
5 ~ ~RYU~ X X 2 19.~ 0 2~ 6.50 162.~
.. 10 ~Y ~ X X 2 19.~ 0 17 6.~ 1~.~
11 ~.[~vE ~N X X 2 19.~ O lQ 6.~ ~.~
14 D~ ~ X X 2 19.~ 5 27 6,~ 162.~
. ~ J~ ~S X X 2 19.~ 2 15 6.~
21 J~ ~ X X 2 19.~ 2 13 6,~ ~,~
23 B~ ~ X X 2 19.~ 4 15 6.~ ~.~
24 ~ P~ X X 2 ~9.~ 4 28 6.~
.. 25 )u~ P~ X X 2 19.~ 10 2~ 6.~ 174.~
26 T~ P~ X X 2 19,~ 3 25 6.~ 1~.~
~ ~ ~S~ X X 2 19.~ 0 12 6,~
_.}1 R~ S~ X X 2 19.~ 5~ 19 6.~ 114,~
37
~ 87~ 85 172~ 655. ~ 132~ 707
~ 4,2~.50
172~
132~
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT
33 /+2 75 57
MOUND ,FIRE 7 7 14
l!lVlfR~ 9 20 29 20
MINNETONKA BEACH FIP,~ 2 2 4 2
,,, l~'llm~ O 0 O 1
MINNETRISTA FIRE 0 3 3 4
I~fERGENCY 2 4 6 2
ORONO FIRE 0 2 2 4
~I~ERGENCY 0 0 0 4
SHOREWOOD FIRE O 0 O 0
~MI~iGEI~ 1 0 1 1
SPRING PARK FIRE ~ 1 7
MUTUAL AID ,F,IRE 0 0 O 0
,,, mm~cY 0 O O ,O
TOTAL FIRE CALLS 15 1} 30 27
TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS 18 27 4[;
~CIAL 2 2 4
RESImNr~AL 7 :~ I2 I3
ImJS~aL O ~ 1
(~sS & MlSC~.T~(~JS 0 Z 2
FALSE ALA~ / PIPE ~ ~ 5 lO
NO. OF NOURS FIRE 219 208 427 321
- MOUND ]~{ERGE~ 164 407 571
TOTAL 383 615 ~}~){} 716
FIRE 36 ZO 56 43
- MTKA BEACH ~GENCY 0 0 0 8
TOTAL 36 20 56 51
FIRE 0 117 117 133
- M' TRISTA ~2{I2~GENCY 25 93 118 41
TOTAL 25 210 235 174
FIRE 0 33 33 96
- ORONO E24]~Gf2qCY 0 0 0 101
... TOTAL 0 33 33 197
,FIRE 0 0 0 0
- SHOREWOOD .~I{ERGE~CY 16 0 16 15
· . ,TOTAL 16 0 16 15
.FIRE 112 9 ~121.!_._. .... 150
- SP. PARK ]~4]~GENCY 135 54 189 36
, ~I)T-AL 247 63 310 186
.F. mE 0 0 0 0
- }trmAL A!O .~,e:RGmC'Y 0 0 0 0
TOTAL O 0 0 0
.TOTAL DRILL HOURS 172~ 170 342½ 325
TOTAL FIRE HOURS 367 387 754 743
TOTAL EMERGENCY HOURS 340 554 894 596
TKTr_AL FIRE & ~GENCY HOURS 707 941 1648 1339
MUTUAL AID RECEIVED 0 1 1 0
MUTUAL AID GIVEN 0 0 0 0
DRILL REPORT
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
Discipline and Teamwork
Critique of fires
Pre-plan and Inspections
Tools and Apparatus Identify
Hand Extinguisher Operation
Wearing Protective Clothing
Films
First aid and Rescue Operation
Use of Self-Contained Masks
X
Pumper Operation
Fire Streams & Friction Loss
House Burnings
Natural/Propane Gas demos,
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzles & Hose Appliance
Hours Training Paid :
~ Excused
X Unexecused
O Present / Not Paid
Miscellaneous :
PERSONNEL
~J.Andersen
Anderson
-J.Babb
Boyd
Bryce
.Bryce
D.Carlson
__J.Case¥
.Collins
.Englehart
S.Erickson
.Fisk
J.Garvais ~M.Palm
D.Grady ~-~7/~T.Palm
K.Grady .Pederson
~-C.Henderson .Rassmusen
~---~P.Henry .Savage
.Landsman .Sipprell
.Marschke .Stallman
.Nafus .Swenson
.Nelson W.Swenson
.Nelson -~ .Vanecek
. Niccum %~J~. ~.Wil liams
.Palm .Williams
ARTMENT
DRILL
Discipline and Teamwork
Critique of fires
Pre-plan and Inspections
Tools and Apparatus Identify
Hand Extinguisher Operation
Wearing Protective Clothing
Films
First aid and Rescue Operation
Use of Self-Contained Masks
REPORT
Date
Pumper Operation
Fire Streams & Friction Loss
House Burnings
Natural/Propane Gas demos.
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzles & Hose Appliance
Hours Training Paid :
~) Excused
X Unexecused O Present / Not Paid
laneous :
PERSONNEL
~//~J.Andersen
G.Anderson
J.Babb
D.Boyd
D.Bryce
S.Bryce
D.Carlson
J.Casey
S.Collins
R.Englehart
S.Erickson
P.Fisk
~J.Garvais
D.Grady
K.Grady
C.Henderson
P.Henry
B.Landsman
R.Marschke
J.Nafus
J.Nelson
.Nelson
B.Niccum
.Palm
~M.Palm
T.Palm
-G.Pederson
7T.Rassmusen
~' M.Savage
~ =K.Sipprell
~ ~R.Stallman
~T.Swenson
W.Swenson
~.~ ~E.Vanecek
.Williams
,~ .Williams~
MOUND FIRE DEPAR~
TOTAL HAINTI~IANCE FOR ~ OF ~
__D__ R. MARSCHKE
~7 J. NAFUS
._~,~_ J. NELSON
~ M. NELSON
~/ B. NICCUM
~ G. PAI~
3 ~.~,~
/._.~ G. P~D]~SON
0 ~. ~ms~ss~
/~ M. SAVAGE
.-~ K. SIPP~3.
,,'-I R. ST_~T,T,KA, N
To SWENSON
E. VANI~EK
R. WILLIAMS
T. WILLIAMS
/
/3'2.:,-'
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 '687
(612) 472-1155
FAX (612) 472 0620
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 6, 1992
City Manager, Members of the City Council. ~/~d
Jon Sutherland, Building Official
FEBRUARY 1992 MONTHLY REPORT
Staff
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
In February 16 building permits were issued for a total valuation of $481,820,
this brought the year-to-date valuation to $498,770 which is a 212% increase over
last year at this time. John Norman, Finance Director, was very pleased when I
gave him these figures.
There were 19 plumbing, mechanical, and miscellaneous permits issued for a total
of 35 permits this month, and 57 year to date. Note the latest Dodge Report,
Minneapolis/St. Paul ranks $5 nationwide in one and two family housing units.
PLANNING & ZONING
The Planning Commission and City Council were again very busy with miscellaneous
zoning requests, the Planning Commission and staff are working diligently on the
review of the proposed Truth in Housing Ordinance.
CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LANDS
An informational meeting was held on February 27th for area realtors and interest
parties relating to construction on public lands and the dock program. It was
the feeling of staff that the information given was very beneficial and well
received by all those who attended.
TRAINING & MEETINGS
Peggy James attended a half day Franklin Planner Time Management seminar to learn
how to use her new planner. Peggy appreciated the opportunity to learn about the
time management program and is currently using the planner to its fullest
potential.
I attended the regular monthly Building Officials meeting.
JS:pj
printed on recycled paper
CITY OF HOUND
5~4! Mayt~Ood Road
MOund, MN 55:564
BUILDING &CTIVITY REPORT
m.me~~~ 1992
?M~ r~ uam ~ ~ 38~,570 ~ 38~,570
'N~ ~RES~DE~I~
t.~&~ ~ ~ ~
DECKS ~" ~
s W Mtic Remode 1 11 ~;>) 94,750 17 109,700
~REIIDENTIAL ADO~ .... ~'~ ' Z 7 109,700
T~Na & ~TERATIONI ~ ~ ~
T~ ~a; I ~ 2,500 2 4,500
TOTAL ~ ANO ~
Yb~ TO OATE ~6 ~81,820
498.770
1991
DWELLING UNITS
1991 1990
1
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Atlanta 21,667 20,428 + 6
Washington, DC 14,.890 169184 -
Phoenix 15,765 109878 +27
Riverside-San Bernardtno 12,924 22,00~ -41
Mtnneapolis-St. Paul 11,862 10,991 + 8
Dallas 11,255 10,267 +10
Detroit 10~02
...,. j .... · 10,242
Las Vegas
Philadelphia 10,121 9,514 + 6
Orlando 9,716 11,126 -15
Baltimore 99299 99750 -
Chicago..?:,.. ~ ... :,. 8,764 109019 -15
8~attlm :'~ ' ~:" '"-' '-~:.'. '~ 7,961 9,594 -17
Indianapolis
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clear~ater 7,925 7,988 - 1
Sacramento 7,701 15,541 -42
Lee Angeles-Long Beach 79570 9,759 -22
Charlotte-Saetonta-Rock Hill 7,479 7,447 + 0
St. Louts 7,471 7,285 +
Kansas City 69969
Columbus 6,510
Jacksonville 6,069 5,991 + 1
Denver 5,869 4~901 +20
Cinctnna~i 5,855 5,412 + 8
Nashville 5,755 59159 +12
San Diego ' 5,610 6,880 -18
Raleigh-Durham 5,5~2 4t925 +12
N~r~olk-Vfl. Beach-Ne~port Ne~ 5,515 ~950 - 7
Richmond-Petersburg 5t4J5 69015 -10
TOTAL .
The regional distribution o~ the 50 areas ia depicted as ~ollows
Structure Type Northeast Mtd~e~t South West
O~e a~d T~o Family I S 15 8
D~elllng unit construction in the 50 areas as compared to the
same period o~ 1990 ts categorized belo~l
Structure__T_y_p.~ Increased Same Decrease~
One and T~o Family
16 I 15
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-I 155
FAX (612) 4720620
Match 6, .1992
TO;
FROM;
Subject;
Ed Shukle
City Manager
Joyce Nelson
Recycling Coo[dinator
February's Recycling
For tile year of 1991 t:be City of Mound recycled 830.'10 tolls
of material, this is 22% of our total waste generated. For
the year of .[990 we £ecycled 689.46 tons, this was 18% of
our waste st. ream.
For the "Special Clean-up Day" I have lined up Goodwill, J.R.
Appliances, Maust Fiber Fu~l fo[' tires. Rick's Scrape Iron
for April 24, & 25. I just hope that we have nice weather
before, during and after. It will be interesting to see how
this program goes.
There will be a bid opening oil March 24 for the Leaf Pickup
and/or Drop-off. Tile Leaf Pickup would be scheduled for
April 24 & 25 also, with the Drop-off be.ing f[om April 12,
thru May 16.
I'm calling around getting prices on brush. There are a few
different ways to handle brush. I will be turning in a
report on this next week.
January's tonnage was 78.01 tons, last year it was 59.09
tons.
printed on recycled paper
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Telephone 472-0621
Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ed Shukle
Len Harrell
Monthly Report for February, 1992
STATISTICS
The police department responded to 711 calls for
service during the month of February. There were 13
Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 3
criminal sexual conduct, 1 burglary, 6 larcenies, and 3
vehicle thefts.
There were 64 Part II offenses reported. Those
offenses included 5 child abuse/neglect, 3 forgery/NSF
checks, 7 damage to property, 1 liquor law violation, 2
DUI's, 7 simple assaults, 5 domestics (2 with
assaults), 23 harassments, 5 juvenile status offenses,
and 6 other offenses.
The patrol division issued 62 adult citations and 7
juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for
an additional 126 tickets. Warnings were issued to 48
individuals for a variety of violations.
There were 3 adults arrested for felonies, 3 adults and
5 juveniles arrested for misdemeanors. There were an
additional 24 warrant arrests.
The department assisted in 6 vehicular accidents; 1
with injuries. There were 27 medical emergencies and
84 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies on
11 occasions in February and requested assistance 9
times.
Property valued at $12,916 was stolen and $2,851 was
recovered in February
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - FEBRUARY, 1992
II.
III.
IV.
We
INVESTIGATION
Investigators worked cases involving theft, harassment,
runaway, NSF checks, assault, internal investigation,
auto theft, kidnaping, burglary, and arson, for a total
of 114 hours. There were 8 child protection cases
worked for a total of 51.25 hours.
personnel/Staffina
The department used approximately 43 hours of overtime
during the month of February. Officers used 74 hours
of comp-time, 98.5 hours of vacation, 10.5 hours of
sick time, and 65.5 holidays. Officers earned 59.75
hours of comp-time in February.
Ail officers attended an in-service shoot at Brooklyn
Park Police Department. Officers Huggett, McKinley,
and Grand attended the Wilson Learning Center. Off.
Niccum completed EMT recertification and Off.
Christenson attended Intoxilyzer training at BCA.
police Reserves
Report not available.
2
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT
FEBRUARYt 1992
GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY
THIS
MONTH
YEAR TO
DATE
Hazardous Citations 47
Non-Hazardous Citations 19
Hazardous Warnings 8
Non-Hazardous Warnings 32
Verbal Warnings 152
Parking Citations 126
DWI 2
Over .10 1
Property Damage Accidents 5
Personal Injury Accidents 1
Fatal Accidents 0
Adult Felony Arrests 9
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 18
Adult Misdemeanor Citations 4
Juvenile Felony Arrests 0
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 7
Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 1
Part I Offenses 13
Part II Offenses 64
Medicals 27
Animmal Complaints 84
Other Public Contacts 498
82
43
12
67
211
198
6
2
15
4
0
12
39
7
2
11
4
34
108
47
154
889
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
101
40
5
48
222
186
18
13
15
5
0
2
68
11
4
22
2
46
97
45
93
803
TOTAL 1,118
Assists 67
Follow-Ups 32
Henn. County Child Protection 8
Mutual Aid Given 11
Mutual Aid Requested 9
1,947
112
40
12
15
9
1,846
79
14
18
2
11
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
FEBRUARY, 1992
CITATIONS
DWI
More than .10% BAC
Careless/Reckless Driving
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speeding
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired, or No Plates
Illegal Passing
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving the Scene
No Insurance
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog Ordinances
Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
MV/ATV
Miscellaneous Tags
ADULT
2
1
0
4
0
30
0
0
13
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
2
126
0
1
1
3
0
188
..JUV
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
FEBRUARY, 1992
W~RNINGS
NO Insurance
Traffic
Equipment
Crosswalk
Animals
Trash/Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
Trespassing
Window Tint
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
WARRANT ARRESTS
Felony Warrant
Misdemeanor Warrants
ADULT
15
?
18
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
45
6
15
JUV
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
$
0
3
OFFENSES
REPO~TED
CLEARED
UNFOUIE) ED
FEBRUARY
EXCEPT o
CLEARED
1992
CLEARED BY
ARREST
ARRESTED
ADULT JUVENILE
.PART ! CRIHES
lieeicide 0 0 0 0
Criminal Sexual Cor~t 3 0 1 1
Robbery 0 0 0 0
Aggravated AssauLt 0 0 0 0
Burg[am/ 1 0 0 0
Larceny 6 0 1 1
Vehicle Theft 3 0 1 0
Arson 0 0 0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
I 0
0 0
0 0
TOTAL
13
PART ii CRIMES
Chi[d Abuse/Negtect 5 2 I 0 0
Forgery/NSF Checks 3 0 3 0 0
Criminal Oamage to Property ? 0 1 0 0
tJeapons 0 0 0 0 0
Narcotics 0 0 0 0 0
Liquor La~s 1 0 0 1 0
DUI 2 0 0 2 2
Siep[e Assautt ? 0 4 0 0
Domestic AssauLt 2 0 I I 1
Domestic (No Assautt) 3 0 0 0 0
Ilarassment 23 0 2 0 0
Juvenile Status Offenses 5 0 I 4 0
Pubtic Peace 1 0 0 0 0
Trespassing 1 0 0 0 0
AIL Other Offenses 4 I 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
PART Il! & PART IV
Property Damage Accidents 5
Persona[ lnjury Accidents 1
Fate[ Accidents 0
NedicaJs 27
~ieaJ Complaints 8~
Nutua[ Aid 11
Other Genera[ Investigations 498
13
TOTAL 626
Ilemepin County ChiJd Protection 8
TOTAL 711
16
10
1
RUII:
PRO03
PROP
TYPE
3-1~AR-9~
PROP
DESC
INCIDENT
NUNBER
INSTALLATION ~ -- HOUNO POLICE DEPARTMENT
E N F 0 R S
PROPERTY - STOLEN/RECOVERED
01/26/92 THRU 02/25/92
SEQ TYPE DATE STOLEN DATE RECOVERED
NO NO STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED VALUE
PAGE
AUTO/TK
AUTO/TK
CLOTH
SNO/ATV
JEI~LRY
RAO[O
RAOIO
SPT EQP
SPT EQP
CURNCY
EQP TLS
ALL OTR
ALL OTR
SN0t~40
92000214
9200025?
920001O9
9200025&
92000209
92000236
92000285
92000203
92000234
92000165
92000236
92000160
92000227
1 02/09/92 $1,000 02/09/92
I 02/18/92 t~,500
1 01/23/92 $?00 02/12/92
I 02/15/92 $4,000 02/22/92
1 02/09/92 $200
2 02/14/92 $100
1 02/22/92 $600
1 02/03/92 $150 02/03/92
1 02/05/92 $1,295
1 01/31/92 $10
1 02/14/92 $340
1 01/31/92 $1 01/31/92
1 02/12/92 $20
$1,000
$7'00
$1,000
$150
$1
TOTALS: $12,916
$2,851
730
RUN: 28- FEB-9~
PRII41UIY ISN'S ONLY?
ACTIVITY CODES:
NO
ALL
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09000 SPEEDING
09001 J-SPEEDING
09006 TEST REFUSAL
09010 BACOVER .10
0901& STOP SIGN
09015 J-STOP SIGN
09026 OVER THE CENTER LINE
090~8 ALL OTHER TRAFFIC
090~,0 NO SEATBELT
09100 PARKING/ALL OTHER
o91¢o NO PARKING/UZNTER HOURS
0~200 DAS/DAR/DAC
09210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED
09309 FOUND/RUNAWAY
0931Z FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS
09313 FOUND PROPERTY
09316 FOUND VEHICLES/IMPOUNDED
09420 DERELICT AUTO
09430 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIOENTS
0~450 PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS
09,r,52
09~63
09~6
H & R ACCIDENTS W/TICKET
IX)GAT LARGE
ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS
INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/26/92 THRU 02/25/92
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
? 6 2 10 5
2 2 2
1
1
1 1
1
2
1
1 2
1 1 3 4
7 6 31 14 59
1 ~ 1
2 2 ~ 6
1
1 2 I 1
2 I 1
2 1
1
1
1 3 1
1
1
PAGE
TOTAL
3O
6
1
1
2
1
2
1
3
9
117
1
5
&
3
1
1
5
1
1
'/31
f~: ~8-FE8-~
CFS03
[$N~S ONLY?
:TiVITY C(:X)ES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NN4E -- N(XJI~ POLICE DEPARTHENT
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/26/9~ THIUJ 02/25/92
ACT
CODE
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
09710 NEDICAL/ASU
09720 NED[CAL/DOA
09730 NEO[CALS
09731 NEDICALS/DX
09732 IqEDICALS/CI
0~7~0 FIRES
09800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED
09801 DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT
09900 ALL NCCP CASES
C~EN DOOR/ALARMS
09930 llANOGUN APPLICATION
09945 SUSPICIOUS PERSON
0995O INFO/INT
09980 T,IARRANTS
09990 NISC. VIOLATIONS
09992 NUTUAL AIO/8100
09993 NUTUAL AID/6500
09994 I~,J'TUAL AID/ ALL OTHER
A5053 ASLT 5-UNKNCR~ ACT-HANDS ETC-ADLT-STR
A5303 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-UNK I~A-AOLT-STR
A5352 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRN-HANDS-ADLT-ACQ
A5354 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM
A5501 ASLT 5'TNRT B(X)ILY HARJ4-UNK ~EAP-ADLT-FAH
1
9 5 2
1
1
1
5 3
1
2
3
6
1
PAGE
TOTAL
1
1
24
1
1
1
7
3
8
1
1
1
1
7
1
3
1
1
'732
RUN: 28-FEB-92
CFSO]
PRINARY ISN~SONLY?
ACTIVITY CODES:
NO
ALL
INSTALLATION NAME -- 14CXJND POLICE DEPARTMENT
ENFORS
CALLS FON SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/26/9:> THRU 02/25/92
ACT
CODE' ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 20 30 40 SO 6O ?0 8O 90
A5502 ASLT 5-THRT B~OILY HARM-LINK UEAP-AOLT-ACQ
B37'94 BURG 3-1JNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-COM THEFT
I3060 CRIN AGNST FM4-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
J2500 TRAFFIC-GN-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
J3500 TRAF-ACCID-NS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
L4031 CSC 2 ~F-AP-LINKACT-GUARDIAN-UNDER 13-F
L~032 CSC 2 UEAP-UNKACT-GUARDIAN-UNDER 13-N
L&075 CSC 2 k~EAP-UNKACT-ACGUAINT-16-17-F
14~1 JUVENILE-ALCOIIOL OFFENDER
N5350 RUNAUAY
N5510 HEALTH-SAFETY-FOOD-ADULTERATED
N3040 DISTIJRB PEACE-#S-PERHIT PUBLIC NUISANCE
N3130 DISTURB PEACE-NS-EHERGENCY TELEPHONE CALLS
N3190 DISTURB PEACE-NS-HARRASSING COHHUNICATIONS
03882 06SENITY-NS-O~SCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT
P3110 PROP D/~U~GE-NS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
P3120 PROP D~,GE-NS-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT
P3310 TRESPASS-NS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
T2029 THEFT-$ZSl-$ZSOO-FE-FRM BUILOING-OTH PROP
T2189
T40Z9
T&059
T&069
THEFT-$ZSI-$ZS(X)-FE-FRM FISHHOUSE-OTH PROP
THEFT-$ZSO LESS-NS-FRN BUILDING-OTH PROP
THEFT-$~)O LESSo#S-FRN YARDS-OTH PROP
THEFT-$~O LES~o#S-FRN HAIL-OTH PROP
2 1
1
2 4
1 1
1
13
1
PAGE
TOTAL
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
21
1
6
1
1
1
1
2
1
i~dN: IS-FEB-92
CFS03
ISN'S ONLY?
CODES:
NO
ALL
ACT
COOE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
U3018
V1024
V2021
V2022
THEFT-NS-BY CHECK - $200 OR LESS
VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-SNMOGILE
VEH THEFT-FE-$251-$2500-AUTO
VEH THEFT-FE-$2S1-$2500-TRUCK-BUS
X31~ CRIN AGNST AOMN JUST-NS-FALSELY REPORT CRIME
INSTALLATION NAME -- ~ POLICE DEPARTMENT
E N F 0 R S
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
01/26/92 THRU 02/25/92
........... PATROL AREAS ...........
10 ZO 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
3
1
1
1
TOTAL
REPORT TOTALS:
39 54 79 69 122 1
7 3
RUN: 2?-FEB-92
OFF01
INSTALLATION NAJqE -- NOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE 1
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CDOES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 01/26/92 THRU 02/25/92
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
A5053
ASLT 5-UNKNOWN ACT-HANDS ETC-ADLT-STR
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
A5303 1
ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTENPTS NR~-UNK UEA-ADLT-STR
A5352 2
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-ACQ
A5354 2
ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM
A5501 2
ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-UNK WF. AP-ADLT-FAN
A5502 3
ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARN-UNKM~AP-ADLT-ACO
B3794 1
BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK UEAP-CON THEFT
13060
CRIN AGNST FAJq-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
J~500 1
TRAFFIC-ON-DRIVE UNOER INFLUENCE OF L]QLIOR
J3500 1
TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIOUOR
L4031 1
CSC 2UEAP-UNK ACT-GUAROIAN-UNDER 13-F
L4032 1
CSC 2 btEAP-UNK ACT-GUARDIAN-UNDER 13-#
0 2 0 0 0 2 2 100.0
0 2 1 0 0 I 1 50.0
0 2 1 0 0 1 1 50.0
0 3 1 0 0 2 2 66.6
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 1 0 1 0 0 I 100.0
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
L4075 I 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 .0
CSC 2 ~EAP-UNK ACT-ACCRJAINT-16-1?-F
M3001 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER
115350 5 0 5 0 0 4 1 5 100.0
RUNA'dAY
RUN: 27-FEB-g2 INSTALLATION NAPE -* 140UNO POLICE DEPARTHENT PAGE
OFF01
ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
CGOES: ALL
ACTIVITY CC~)ES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 01/26/92 THRU 02/25/92
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PEHDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPT[ON CLEARED CLEARED
145510 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
HEALTH-SAFETY-FOCX)-ADULTERATED
N30~O 1
DISTURB PEACE-NSoPERNIT PUBLIC NUISANCE
N3130 1
DISTURB PEACE-NS-EHERGENCY TELEPHONE CALLS
N3190 2O
DISTURB PEACE-NS-HARRASSING COHMUNICATIONS
06SENITY-NS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 20 19 0 0 1 I 5.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
P3110 6 0 6 5 0 0 I 1 16.6
DJ~Nd~6E-NS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
PROP DN4AGE-NS-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT
TZ029 1
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRN BUILDING-OTH PROP
T2189 1
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRH FISHHOUSE-OTH PROP
1 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 .0
T40~9 2
THEFT-$2SO LESS-MS-FRN BUILDING-OTH PROP
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
T4059
THEFT-$2SO LESS-NS-FRN YARDS-OTH PROP
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
T4~9
THEFT-S250 LESS-NS-FR# NAIL-OTH PROP
0 2 0 1 0 1 2 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
U3018 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 3 100.0
THEFT-RS-BY CHECK o $200 OR LESS
V1024 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-SNCXJ40BILE
V2021 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
VEN THEFT-FE-S251-$2500-AUTO
RUN: 27-FEBo92
OFF01
INSTALLATIOI~ NAIqE -- NOUND POLICE DEPARTNENT
PAGE 3
PRINARy ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 01/26/92 THRU 0:>/25/92
/ ................ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. /
ACTIVITY COOE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST .... BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
V~022 1 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 .0
VEH THEFT-FE-$:>51-$2500-TRUCK-BUS
X3190 1
CRIN AGNST ADMN JUST-NS-FALSELY REPORT CRINE
0 I 0 I 0 0 I 100.0
REPORT TOTALS - 70 3 67 41
5 5 16 :>6 38.8
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROA~
MOUND MINNESOTA 553e4
612i 472-I
FAX ~612) 472-0620
March 6, 1992
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER
JOHN L. NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR ~
FEBRUARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORTS
INVESTMENTS
Balance February 1, 1992
$6,062,991
Bought:
T. Notes 5.90 Dain Due 2-15-92 300,000
CD 3.85 Marquette Due 5-1-92 148,738
CP 4.02 Marquette Due 5-15-92 148,980
Matured:
CP 5.05 Marquette (370,592)
FNMA 8.00 Dain (201,985)
CP 5.75 Dain (100,435)
Balance February 29, 1992
$5,987,697
1991 AUDIT
A good portion of my time in February wa spent in preparation for the annual audit.
All year end adjustments must be made to close out the accounts for 1991. the final
audit report is scheduled to be presented to the Council the second meeting in April
(make sure to mark your calender).
JN:ls
printed on recycled paper
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-1155
FAX (612) 472-0620
FROM:
D/qTE:
SUBJECT:
CITY MANAGER
CITY CLERK
MARCH 4, 1991
FEBRUARY MONTHLY REPORT
There were two regular Council Meetings in February. There was
agenda preparation, minutes, 9 resolutions, and clean-up items from
the two meetings.
I am continuing to input the 1992 mintues (resolutions and motions)
on the Clerk's Index Program.
The sales and burials in the Cemetery in the last part of 1991 and
the beginning of 1992 have been inputted into the computer.
I completed my annual report which was presented at the February
25th Meeting.
We began to gear up for the upcoming Presidential Primary which
will be held on April 7, 1992. Past election judges were all
written letters so that they could commit to working any one or all
three of the elections to be held'this year.
I started and completed a project that I have wanted to do for a
long time. I took all the ordinances and amendments that have ever
been adopted by the City of Mound since its incorporation and cross
referenced them to the current code where possible. Now we have a
history for each ordinance. This will help when someone wants to
know when a particular part of an ordinance was adopted.
There were the usual calls and questions from citizens regarding
various subjects.
fc
printed on recycled paper
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364-1687
~6t2) 472-1155
FAX (612) 472-0620
PARKS DEPARTMF
FEBRUARY 1992 MONTHLY REPORT
PARKS
February went by fast, a lot of things occupied my time such as, the
final draft of the Parks Department Annual Report and its presentation
to the City Council, along with the preparation of recommendations
requested by the COW relating to encroachments on city properties and
the marking of public lands with monuments. We also worked on a
presentation to realtors and interested public on issues dealing with
the City's Dock Program. This presentation, I felt, went over very
well, there was a lot of work put in by Peggy James, Tom McCaffrey, Jon
Sutherland, and myself, and I felt it was well received by those who
attended. We intend to do this again in 1993.
DOCKS
The application process for 1992 is going along fine. Tom McCaffrey is
handling all of the applications and has a real good grasp of the
program now. As usual, we get about 70 percent of all the 447
applications back the last couple of weeks in February. They are due
before March 1, after that there are late penalties.
With the lake level up, this year should prove to increase the number of
sites used. We had a few vacant sites last year, it seems people were
reluctant with the previous three years of drought.
We had 300 lineal feet of shoreline riprapped on Devon Commons by
Minnetonka Portable Dredging.
~REE REMOVAL
One tree was marked for removal on City property.
done in March.
This work will be
printed on recycled paper
Parke Department Monthly Report
February 1992
Page 2
SKATING RINKS
The weather has not been good all winter for rinks. We let the rinks go
right after mid-February. It seems like we would get a few good days
for flooding then a week of warm weather would come and melt what we had
done. In 1993 we will only provide three rinks, Three Points Park,
Highlands Park, and Philbrook Park. We have tried Doone Park for three
years and because of the grade of the land we cannot get a good surface
of ice.
CEMETERY
With the snow melting we can see all the repair work that needs to be
done before Memorial Day. It is going to be a lot due to the number of
new graves and the damage that was done to dig them.
JF:pj
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364 1687
612472 1!55
FAX (612~ 472 062~
March 2, 1992
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER
JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER ~'~
FEBRUARY 1992 MONTHLY REPORT
Once again we had a major leaD in sales for a month. Although some of it can
be attributed to the extra day this month. Sales were $84,783. Compare this to
February 1991 when we had $72.664 in sales and you will see what I mean. So far
for the year, we are $29,681 ahead of 1991's record setting pace. Don't get too
excited however. Things simply cannot and will not maintain this torrid rate for the
rest of the year. If they did, we would have to open Mound Liquor #2.
Unfortunately, we spent some of our hard earned money on equipment repair.
First, one of our beer cooler fans broke off its mountings and shattered into pieces.
Secondly, our incoming automatic door opener broke again for the umpteenth time.
The mechanism is prehistoric and it is difficult to find parts here in the metro area.
So I made one of those major managerial decisions and decided to give the dinosaur
the axe, and go with the ever reliable manual system.
When time permitted last month, I began and finished the process of recoding
our liquor and wine inventory in preparation for our new cash register system which
should be ready sometime in late March or early April. These new registers will be a
welcome relief. They will save us an extraordinary amount of time because we will
no longer have to have to tag each bottle. With the old tags gone, the appearance
of our shelves will improve, and, we will now have a tighter control as far as
maintaining a more accurate inventory method plus an easier way of purchasing.
printed on recycled paper
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472-? !55
FAX (612) 472-3620
March 2, 1992
TO;
FROM;
SUBJECT;
Ed Shukle
City Manager
Greg Skinner
Water & Sewer Supt.
February's Activity Report
The month of February produced 1 sewer force main break on
Three Points Blvd. and 1 watermain break on Ramble Rd. With
the mild weather we have had breaks continue to happen but in
smaller numbers.
I have switched some jobs tasks in the Water Department over
to Damon and Scott in the Sewer Department. They both are
now taking care of our 4 Wells and 1 booster station. This
will give them some much needed training in the water system.
This also gives the Water Department more time to try to
catch-up on meter and outside reader repairs.
John, Joyce and myself met with the Sensus Technology people
who manufacture the Sensus Touchread meter system. We took a
tour of Waconia's meter reading system which employs Sensus
meters and reads their meters via telephone lines. This was
very informative and interesting.
The Annual report was given to the Council on February 11.
Finished for another year.
In addition to the Sewer Departments added responsibilities
in the Wate~ Department, we finished up with John Cameron for
our 5 Lift Station upgrades this year. We have shown only 1
contractor the stations so far. There were 5 contractors who
picked up specs. Bid opening is set for March 6, 1992.
printed on recycled paper
ORDINANCE
1992-
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MOUND CITY CODE BY AMENDING
SECTION 920:15 REGULATING NOISE IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
THE CITY OF MOUND DOES ORDAIN:
Chapter IX Penal Offenses is hereby amended by adding the
following Subdivision 2. to Section 920:15:
Section 920:15. Noise in Residential Areas.
Subdivision 1. No person shall, between the hours of 10:00
p.m. and 7:00 a.m., congregate because of or participate in
any party or gathering of people from which noise emanates
of a sufficient volume so as to disturb the peace, quiet or
repose of persons residing in any residential area.
No person shall visit or remain within any residential
dwelling unit wherein such party or gathering is taking
place except persons who have gone there for the sole
purpose of abating the disturbance.
A police officer may order all persons present, other than
the owners or tenants of the dwelling unit, to immediately
disperse in lieu of being charged under this ordinance.
Owners or tenants of the dwelling unit shall immediately
abate the disturbance and if they do not abate the
disturbance they shall be in violation of this ordinance.
Subdivision 2. No person shall, between the hours of 10:00
p.m. and 7:00 a.m., create, cause, generate or reproduce
noise or sound of a sufficient volume so as to disturb the
peace, quiet or repose of persons residinq in any
residential area. ~
Mayor
City Clerk
Adopted by the City Council
Published in Official Newspaper
RDD -OX./
ANTHONY R. SODERMAN ^TI'ORNEY AT I.~W
428 NORWEST MIDLAND BUILDING · 401 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH · MINNEAPOUS, MINNESOTA 5,5401 · (612) 3.38-2600
March 5, 1992
Sgt. Brad Roy
Mound Police Department
5341Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55356
9
Dear Sgt. Roy:
Often, I find myself clashing with police officers in a variety
of ways, but most often in the courtroom. A significant amount
of my caseload involves criminal defense work, and I have had
occasion to meet many officers in their line of duty. Very often
I am critical of their performance so after my experience with
you on Wednesday, March 4, 1992, I felt it would be appropriate
for me to drop you a quick note of thanks.
You may recall that you had stopped one of my clients, D
Z in connection with a speeding offense and sub-
sequently turned up a warrant for a probation violation. I was
especially impressed by the way you handled the situation and the
degree of accommodation you showed to me and my client. In fact,
in more than 20 years of this work, this is one of the few let-
ters of appreciation I have written a police officer.
From the standpoint of the City, you saved them money by avoiding
a trip downtown and back to Mound together with handling whatever
part of the booking process would have been necessary. As for
the County, you saved them the expense of keeping Mr.
Z' overnight, feeding him and transporting him back to
Ridgedale the following day. And for my client, you spared him
from an overnight in Jail which he did not deserve. (The proba-
tion violation did occur as a result of an administrative error
in the Department of Court Services downtown.)
After I drove my client home, he explained to me the circumstances
of his arrest as well as the understanding you showed for his
predicament. As I am sure you could tell from his record, he has
had many traffic citations over the years and many contacts with
the police. He was effusive in his praise, too!
As a resident of Mound and having resided in the Mound area for
nearly 20 years, this is particularly pleasant for me.
Therefore, I wanted to drop you a quick line both to thank you
and to congratulate you for handling this in the manner you did.
Best_wishes.
uly yours,
ARS/tms
MAR 10 '9~ 08:39RM C~1I EHGR 61~-540-458~ P.~
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
.0 ~S, WAY.Ti BOULEVARD, ,UITE , 60 · WA~TA. MINNESOTA 553,1 · TELEHONE '1~473'7033
EUOENE R, STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE OIRECTOR
'rem R~. vi~
j, ~. ~wln~l,
Minnelo~
Ex~l~or
JoEl~n L, Nurr
Orono
William A. Johns~ne
Minnetonkl
Du~
Wapiti
V~eda
Tom
Te~ka
Sho~o~
R~ E. ~l~um
Wo~and
TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 10, 1992
FROM: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE
SUBJECT: FEBRUARY REPORT - LMCD ~'D "~
1.0 GENERAL INTEREST ITF~
1.1 l~tt~aslon _Waterrrdlfoil Task_ Force.
Tom Penn has assumed thc wl¢ of LMCD chair of thc Milfoil Task
Force. I am confident that hc will do a fine job. Forecast for this year is
much like last, so barges will not bo used in the harvesting effort. Sonar
treatment in one or two s.an]p!c bays,is being planned. This is an eradication
approach. We ar~ doing it jomfly with thc DNR and local shomowners. It
is hoped that they will share in the costs,
There is much activity at the legislature on exotics, The DNR is
adopting the lead role, augmented by other L_sk¢ association lobbyists, so
that we can cut back and put more of our attention into looking after our
own lake, and continuing to' offer it as a test lab for potential control
systems.
1.2 Man~t~ement Plan
Key initiatix;es this year include resolufio, n of the access question and
the validation of density studies. The Access sub committee has been
meeting with other stake holders to see what de£mition and level of acce,~ is
acceptable. The Metropolitan Council has declined to patti. 'cip.a. te, feeling
that their role as ,ag. oversight agency would be compromisea mereoy.
The DNR ts working jointly with the LMCD to conduct new density
and user attitude studies. The previous studies maybe have been flawed.
The actual density of the lake's use during certain key periods, trigger
events in the Management Plan,
The Managcrnent Plan itself in the final version was published this
month.
1.3 Other General Interest Items.
The action on two recent vat.lance requests concemingplacing docks
across we[lands give rise some womsome potentials that couldrcsult in lots
of docks in Se:ton Lak~. There aro somo unusual circumstance~ in the, se
applications, but we are watching to see that precedence is not set that
would allow wholesale use of wetlands for boat docks.
The mortgage on the Shomwood Yacht Club is being fore, closed.
The Marina business on the lake has been a tou~h one these past few years.
The new Yacht Club w be built in Spring Park has had all kinds of
problems with its financing. The occupancy date of 1991 noted on the lot
sign obviously was not met.
1
MAR 10 '92 08:40AM GMI EMC. R 612-540-4582 P.3
2.0 CITY SPECIFIC ITEMS - MOUND
2.1 Chapman Place apparently has concluded an agreement with
Vincent McClellan, son of Robert, next door, to operate the. it 'marina'.
This arrangement seems to satisfy the requirement for an arm's length '
agreement. I still feel that the level of amenities relating to the marina
operation that were there when it was Surf.side are still owed th~ public.
2.2 Eric Bodine, who has a summer residence at 5025 Wren Rd
pea houseboat frozen in, He has been deicing but not attending to the
.m., allowing it to cause Open water. This has been the source of much
re~ntative .
tonka Conservation Dis~ict
c~ Oene Stmmmen
LAKE HINNBTONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE
AGENDA
7:30 AM Saturday, March 14, 1992
Norwest Bank Bldg, 900 E Wayzata Blvd, Rm 135
(Elevator access for handicapped,
use west entrance, Wayzata Blvd)
Review of public hearing reports:
A. Rockvam Boat Yards, Coffee Cove - Dock Length Variance
Ron Whinnery, Carson's Bay - Dock Length Variance
Halstad Acres Improvement Assn., Halsted's Bay - New multiple
dock license
Bean s Greenwood Marina, St. Alban s Bay - New multiple dock
license and length variance
Bupp Dock Length Variance, Carsons Bay; review draft of Order
Excelsior Park Tavern, Excelsior Bay; amenity presentation to
qualify for new dock and special density licenses
Multiple dock licenses:
A. Renewal applications
B. New dock license applications for changes Jn configuration that
do not increase slip size, number of BSU or WSU:
1) Schmitt's Marina
2) City of Wayzata
3) Clay Cliffe Homeowners Assn.
4) Minnetonka Yacht Club
Discussion of allowing exchange of Boat Storage Units from a
District Mooring Area License to a Multiple Dock License; staff
memo enclosed
Amended draft of Ordinance Relating to Storage of Lake Maintenance
Equipment on Lake Minnetonka, amending Code Section 2.03, Subd. 8
Review status of unrestricted watercraft:
A. Multiple dock licenses with slide storage - summary review
B. Canoes - discuss whether non-motorized canoes should be
included in unrestricted category
C. Discuss whether unrestricted watercraft should be counted in
BSUs and WSUs for multiple dock licensees
Wetlands Update
Additional business recommended by the committee
LAKE HINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Public Hearing:
Halstad Acres Improvement Association, Outlot 1,
Halstead Acres Second Addition, Mound, Halsteds
Bay. New multiple dock license application for
a 13 slip dock.
Meeting:
7:00 pm Wednesday, February 26, 1992
Tonka Bay City Hall
Members Present: Thomas Reese, Vice Chair, Mound; Bert Foster,
Deephaven; Wm. Johnstone, Minnetonka; Jan Boswinkel, Minnetonka
Beach; Scott Carlson, Minnetrista; Robert Rascop, Shorewood;
Douglas. Babcock, Spring Park; Tom Penn, Tonka Bay; Duane Markus,
Wayzata. Also present: Charles LeFevere, Counsel; Rachel
Thibault, Administrative Technician; Eugene Strommen, Executive
Director.
.The Public Hearing was called to order by Reese at 7:35 pm.
The Board received a report of the new multiple dock license.
application details, dated 2/26/92 along with affidavits from 13
current and previous owners detailing the docks they have had at
the subject location in the past.
Bob Bittle, 2927 Halsted Acres, Mound, spoke for the
applicant. Mr. Bittle is one of 13 owners of the outlot. Each of
the owners is taxed individually for their share of the outlot
property. The 1/13th interest in the outlot cannot be sold away
from the individual homeowner's property. The association has had
7 slips at a dock extending over 100' long during the low water
period. The outlot has 365' of shoreline.
Bittle said they are not registered as an association. He
raised the question as to whether each individual owner could put
out a dock at this site without a permit. Bittle said that over
the years there have been at least 12 boats stored on the
property.
Gordon Tulberg, 6264 Bay Ridge Road, former member of the
association, reviewed the history of the property. He said if the
13 owners are not allowed an individual slip the property becomes
worthless.
LeFevere said the LMCD Code states each subdivided lot or
parcel has certain rights. With over 350 feet of shoreline,
according to the Code (Section 2.02, Subd.1), the property is
entitled to 7 slips, one for each 50' of shoreline. Even though
the outlot is owned by 13 individuals, they cannot have 13 slips.
The Code uses the number of feet of shoreline, not the number of
people owning the property.
LeFevere explained that the LMCD ordinance regulation of 1
boat per 50 feet of shoreline was adopted in August 1978. No,i-
conforming facilities existing at that time were grandfathered in.
If there is proof that 13 slips existed in 1978, the LMCD would
consider grandfathering that number providing the license fees
from 1978 to the present were paid. He suggested aerial photos or
sworn affidavits could be used as proof.
Halstad Acres Improvement Assoc., Publlc llearlng, 2/26/92, Pg.2
Bittle responded that it will be difficult to provide a photo
of 13 slips at one time at this site prior to 1978· He said that
each of the 13 properties had lakeshore property with rights to
have a dock at that time (1978) and he belleves they should be
able to continue these rights.
LeFevere responded that there is no guarantee that every
person owning property is entitled to a boat. Actually, as time
goes by, the restrictions may become greater. It was his
suggestion the owners work out how to allocate the 7 slips.
LeFevere added that if the properties are being taxed based on the
right to a slip on the lake, they might want to check into this.
The DNR submltted a letter dated 2/26/92 stating that: a 13
slip dock would require a protected waters permit for a private
marina.
The Public ltearing was closed at 7:48 pm.
Findings:
The Halstad Acres Improvement A~sociation, represented by
Gordon Tulberg, has submitted a multiple dock license
application for 13 slips on Outlet 1, Halstead Acres Second
Addition, Mound, Halsted's Bay.
The association consists of 13 homeowners in Halstead Acres
Second division who each own 1/13 interest in Outlet 1. Each
owner is taxed on 1/13 interest in the outlet property.
Outlet 1 has 365' of lakeshore which would provide for 7 slips
under the current code Section 2.02, Subdivision 1.
The application is for 13 slips to provide 1 slip for each
member.
The area was developed in the late 1950's. The outlet was
deeded to the 13 homes not on the lake to provide lake access.
A seasOnal dock has been maintained at this site since the
1970's. The number of slips varied each year depending on how
many homeowners used the dock. No evidence has been provided
that a 13 slip dock ever existed at this site.
To grandfather the 13 sllp dock with a density of 1 boat per
28' of shoreline, the applicant would have to provide evidence
that the structure existed with 13 slips before the Code
ordinance was adopted in August 1978. Back-licensing to 1978
for the proven number of slips would be required, including
payment of fees for each year back-licensed.
The DNR has determined that a new 13 slip dock would be
considered a private marina and would require a DNR protected
waters permit.
Ilalste~d Acren ImproveRen: gssocJ, atlon
Of Otltlot 1, [IAI,STEAD ACRES ~ND ADDITION
[[ennepin County, Mt. nnesota
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVF, YED: ti4
Outlet 1, IIALSTF~D ACRES 2ND ADDITIO~I
Thi~ nnrvev intend~ to show the bonndaries of the abnve described
property, ~nd the location of an existing fence, dock and light
;~le thereon. It does not p~rport to ~how any othe~ improven~nts
or en~roachnent~.
~'~~=~~~ I hereby certify Ll~t this survey was prepared by me ur under my dirc~ sue'r:
~~11~ j~l~[{l~l;]~ ~J vision, and Ih~t lam a duly re8isle~ Civil EnGineer and C~nd Surveyor under
..... -~ ..... Mar~ S. Gron~rg Minne~ola License ~um~r 1~755
FEB 3 1992
Iron marker found
Iron m;irker sos:
Bearings shown are
based upon nn a.~:s~lmed
datum.
March 2, 1992
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364
,6!2~ 472 1155
FAX (612/ 472-0620
TO; Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM; Geno Hoff
Street Supt.
SUBJECT;
February Activity Report
The weather has been so mild this month that we've been doing
alot of early spring work. The main thing this month was
the cutting and trimming of trees and brush on street right-
of-way. We've been getting alot of flack from residents that
don't like the idea. Most of those that complain understand
why, when we explain what we're doing. Of course we have
some that don't want to understand and more than likely they
would be the first to complain about not being able to see
around the corner because of brush.
As you all know the streets are taking a real beating this
winter. With the added moisture last Fall and the streets
laid on every different kind of soil you can think of. Some
soil when it freezes expanse more than others, thus giving us
a very uneven surface. There is one thing in our favor, come
Spring the streets will settle back to the same condition
they were last summer except for the cracks and potholes left
behind and that where the Street Department comes into the
picture. We have hand patched 12 tons of winter mix this
month and probably will be doing the same next month. Winter
mix is only a temporary patch until we can get hot mix.
The week of the 10th two of the Street crew started 'to get
our street sweepers ready for Spring clean up. As you can
imagine a sweeper is a very maintenance machine. It takes
two men the better part of a week to repair and check
everything from top to bottom. This year our 81 needed
$600.00 dollars worth of chains and sprockets, that's not bad
for 10 years of service. We spent about $1,200 on parts for
the two machines. All of the replacement of parts and labor
was done by Street crew.
We had a total snowfall of a little over 5" this month and
printed on recycled paper
that all came on the 24th, that's the only time we've been
out with the snow equipment.
We hauled the rest of the salt sand from Island Park to our
storage area at the Public Works. With a little luck this
will last us for the rest of the snow season.
CEMETERY WORK
Laid out 4 graves.
SIGN WORK
8 - Stop, 2 - No Parking.
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
473-7033
L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE
March 1992
Wednesday
11
Lake Access Task Force
7:00 pm, City of Minnetonka, Community Room
14600 Minnetonka Blvd
Saturday
14
Water Structures Committee
7:30 am, # 135 Norwest Bank Building
Wayzata
Monday
16
Lake Use and Recreation Committee
4:30 pm, # 135 Norwest Bank Building
Wayzata
Tuesday
17
Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force
8:30 am, # 135 Norwest Bank Building
Wayzata
Wednesday
25
LMCD Board of Directors' Regular Meeting
7:30 pm, Tonka Bay City Hall
2-26-92
NINUTES OF A MEETINH OF THE
HOUND ADVISORY PLANNINH COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 24~ 1992
Those present were: Acting Chair Geoff Michael, JerrY Clapsaddle,
Frank Weiland, Michael Mueller, and Mark Hanus, City Council
Representative Liz Jensen, City Manager Ed Shukle, City Planner
Mark Koegler, Building Official Jon Sutherland, and Secretary Peggy
James. Absent and excused was Bill Meyer, Bill Voss and Brian
Johnson.
There were no other citizens present.
T.M_~__NUTES
The February 10, 1992 Planning Commission Minutes were presented
for changes and/or additions.
NOTION made by Hanus, seconded by Clapsaddle, to approve
the February 10, 1992 Planning Commission Ninutes as
written. Notion carried unanimously.
~HORELAND MANAGF. M~_.NT ORDINANCE:
LAND USES, AND LOT
City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed the Proposed Shoreland
Management Ordinance definitions. The only change recommended was
in definition $4, Building Line, it was suggested the that "and/"
be added as follows: " from said right-of-way line and/or
ordinary high water level.%, '
The City Planner displayed a color coded map showing the Shoreland
Areas and the category which applies to each area. Land uses were
reviewed, and Koegler reviewed the differences in shoreland uses
versus zoning uses (i.e. which ones were "permitted uses,"
"conditional uses," "accessory uses," and "not allowed"). The
Commission was concerned about existing uses which are permitted
becoming nonconforming. The shoreland overlay approach was
discussed.
It was noted that the "Teal Point" area should probably be
classified as a Natural Environment area, Koegler will verify.
Clapsaddle commented that Mound should hold onto its industrial
areas. Koegler explained that the DNR may be looking for trade-
offs, for example, they may allow our industrial area and our 50
foot lakeshore setback in exchange for improvements relating to
water quality issues such as run-off.
Planning Co~£ss£on M£nutes
February 24, 1992
The City Planner will be meeting with the DNR to review the use
charts and lot area and width, then he will return to the Planning
Commission with their feedback. Mueller reminded Koegler to check
into the question why the lot area requirement was greater for
sewered lots rather than non-sewered.
FLOODPLAIN ORDINANC~
City Planner, Mark Koegler, explained to the commission the changes
in federal legislation which requires the City of Mound to amend
its floodplain ordinance. A model ordinance jointly prepared by
FEMA and the DNR will be used. The time schedule for adoption of
the Mound Floodplain Ordinance was reviewed. The proposed
ordinance will be incorporated with the existing City Code Section
300:10 and brought back to the Planning Commission for their review
at the next workshop meeting on March 23, 1992.
_TRUTH IN HOUSIN~
Liz Jensen reviewed the City Council,s discussion from the previous
C.O.W. meeting relating to Truth in Housing and code compliance
versus compliance to a set of standards. Basically, the City
Council's direction was to take Minneapolis, standards, adopt and
adapt them for Mound, they do not want the option of code
compliance, all structures should be compared to the same set of
standards, and of course, the zoning sheets needs to be enhanced.
The Planning Commission then reviewed proposed Section 318 line-by-
line, changes suggested and it was also noted that some general
clean-up is required.
$ines 13 & 38: Relating to condominiums, multiple family dwellings,
and three family dwellings. Liz commented that three and four-
plexes are rental properties and will be covered under the rental
maintenance ordinance. It was determined that the ordinance should
consistently throughout include townhouses and condominiums.
Lines 19 - 22: Jensen commented that what we really want this
section to say is, someone we have certified has used due-diligence
in comparing this structure to the standard and has reported on the
form what was found. The following was suggested, ,, . · . meeting
the certification standard prescribed by Section 318:05 and bee
............................... ~ ............ accurately reflects a
comparison of the property t9 the items contained on said form as
of the date thereon except as specifically designed thereon."
It was questioned if the property should be compared to the items
on "said form." Should this be compared to the standards which is
2
Plann£ng Comm£ee£on M£nutee
February 24, 1992
titled the "evaluator's guide?" Or, should the comparison be made
to Section 3187 It was suggested that staff work with this
paragraph to clean it up.
~ine 29:
~ine 30:
Delete "one of the following"
Delete "either" and "(i)"
Line 44: Delete "when used as the disclosure document required by
this chapter"
Line 48: Revise "Aq-t-~e~e~ A Disclosure reports and _A_~:~_~_
~ i..~8 not deemed valid without . . ."
Line 75: This line should be modified to include condominiums be
deleting "nor to condominiums"
Line 83: This line should also include condominiums.
~ines 78 - ~07: It was suggested that this section have sub-
headings, "a." and "b.," to reflect two sections of "the form."
The first subheading should start at line 81 relating to minimum
code requirements, and the second section should start at line 95
relating to determination of zoning status.
Lines 95 - 100: This portion should be tailored Mound's zoning
status report. It was discussed if a survey should be required to
be filed with the report. It was determined that a survey should
not be required at this time, and that this could be proposed in
the future. It was also noted that "status of commons" be included
on the zoning form.
Lines 100 - 102: Relating to homestead classification, should this
be disclosed by the owner, the evaluator, or by the building
department? It was determined that the building department verify
this and that the question of homestead classification be included
on the zoning status sheet.
Lines 102 - 105: Mueller referred to this section relating to
the owner signing the disclosure report stating that they have or
have not had water in their basement. It was noted that the
seller/owner should be able to add comments to a "yes" or "no"
answer. Mueller questioned what will happen when a mortgage
company is selling the house and they do not have any knowledge of
water problems? It was determined to leave this section as is.
Lines 111 - ~3: Revise" . . . eight (8) membersv, one of which
is t~he Building Official, or designee, shall be a non-voting
Planning Commission Minutes
February 24, 1992
member of the
Line 114: Jensen suggested that the terms be changed from two years
to three years to be consistent with other commission's terms.
Lines 140 & 141: Revise" . . . upon payment of the required
fees and filing of proof of insuranc- thereof~.
Line 155: Revise" · . and shall pay the non-refundable fee as
established by the ~ity Council -~ ...... ~--- --
t ....tz f~.~ dollars '~= ""'
~ine 195: Revise" . . . each Truth-in-Housing Disclosure Report
within ten (10) calendar days after the evaluation inspection has
been made.
Line 187: Revise # . i ~ an annual renewal fee as established by
the City Councilv.-= f f j ~v~ ~.~, ......... x, · · ·
Lines 190 - 191: Revise to allow a City of Mound employee to be
certified in other cities.
Line 198: Revise #A filing fee as established by the City Council
-~ ~ ...... '~ .... ' made payable to the City Treasurer,
Line 214: Revise" . . . address of his/her agent or other . . .,,
Mueller suggested that Mound also consider adopting Minneapolis'
Code of Ethics for Certified Truth-in-Sale of Housing Evaluators.
The Commission agreed.
GOVERNMENT TRAININ~ SERVICE SEMINAR'S
The City Manager reviewed the available seminars and informed the
Commissioner's that they need to RSVP for both seminars by March 1.
CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE'S REPORT
Liz Jensen reviewed the City Council Meeting of February 11, 1992.
She informed the Commission that the City Council has set a public
hearing date of April 28, 1992 for the Rental Housing Maintenance
Ordinance. The City is proposing a Spring recycling clean-up, a
tentative date of April 24 and 25 has been set. The Council is
also looking into a leaf pick-up.
4
Planning Commies£on Minutes
February 24, 1992
MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Hanus, to adjourn the
meotinq at 10~19 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Chair, Bill Meyer
Attest:
5
February 27, 1992
City of Mound
Mr. Skip Johnson, Mayor
5341Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Dear Skip:
On behalf of all of the RE/MAX A-1 Excellence agents I want to
Thank You for the wonderful job that you and the staff members
did at the meeting regarding public lands. We got good hard-
core information which will be very useful in dealing with
buyers and sellers in our wonderful city.
Would you please pass along my sincere Thanks to the staff
members who took their time to present this meeting? As
usual, Mound again takes the lead in providing information
for the public good.
David L. Feerhusen
Broker
~//~~ A-1 Excellence
2477 Shadywood Road
Lake Minnetonka
Orono, Minneaota 55331
U
ae$ociation of
metr. opo!!t, gn
mun apa mee
Legislative
Contact
Alert
March 9, 1992
TO:
Mayors, Legislative Contacts and Managers/Administrators
FROM:
Roger Peterson, Director of Legislative. Affairs
Vern Peterson, Executive Director
GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL AND STATUS OF MAJOR METROPOLITAN
AREA PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE BIT.T~
fo
GOVERNORS BUDGET HAMMERS CITIES!
CUTS TO CITIES OUTRAGEOUS!
The Governor's overall budget proposal uses accounting gimmicks for
savings of $178 million for schools, reduces 'rainy day fund' by
$140 million, cuts state agencies and higher education by $164
million, and cities LGA by $71.6 million.
City aid cut of $71.6 million is 23% of LGA, equalization aid, and
city disparity reduction aid. For cities receiving these aids, this
equals an 8%-plus cut of Revenue base (i.e. aids plus levy).
Schools, Counties,
are held harmless!
HACA have no cut.
Towns, Special Districts,
Not all cities are cut.
Is this divide and conquer?
get ZERO cuts. They
Those receiving only
Enclosed is a preliminary run showing the impact on AMM cities. The
AMM position at this point is that cuts to cities are unnecessary.
Additional use of the rainy day fund may cause small short term
state borrowing but that would have no impact on the state's bond
rating and would certainly be preferable to the major impact the
cuts would have on the general public health and safety if cities
are forced to make large cuts.
Cities should contact their legislators and relate how this may
-1-
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-4008
impact locally. The AMM absolutely does not want to get into a
battle among cities but pointing out that schools, counties, and
towns are held harmless is appropriate.
POINTS TO STRESS:
Cities have already done their part. Local government, through
aid cuts and support of sales tax increase, solved 41% of the
state's $1.2 billion problem in 1991 while accounting for only
10% of the state budget. Likewise, we solved over 35% of the
problem in 1990. For the past 3 years, cities have taken cuts,
held levies down, spent tax dollars wisely, reduced employees,
and this is our reward.
The administration says this is a 1.1% cut of base. This is
very misleading. The cut is 1.1% of all County, City, Town, and
Special District Revenue but only cities are cut. The cut
becomes 3.5% of all city revenue but 7% of operating budgets
when non-cuttable special assessment revenue is eliminated.
Finally, the cut becomes'about 8% after nonLLGA cities are
removed. When one gets beyond smoke and mirrors, this is a 23%
cut of all city LGA and an 8% cut of city revenue base.
Cities need to communicate the impact of these cuts to their
legislators. Remind them of the cutbacks already taken.
Register indignation. Think about use of city newsletters and
local media to get the unfairness story out. It is about time
the state stops solving its problems on the back of cities.
Minnesota cities spend at about the national average, but when
all Minnesota state and local governments are added together,
spending is much greater than the national average. We aren't
the problem and shouldn't be the solution.
NOTE 1: THE ATTACHED RUN IS BASED ON ALT. $71.6 MILT.TON AID CUT
COMING FROM CITIES AID NOT INCLUDING HACA. THE REVENUE BASE
USED WAS 1991 WHICH SHOULD BE SIMILAR TO 1992. THE ACTUAL
CUTS NAY VARY BY A FEW DOT~.ARS.
NOTE 2: THE AMM HAS JUST LEARNED THAT THE ADMINISTRATION HAS
DELAYED RET~ASING THE ACTUAL PLAN AND BITS., THUS THEY NAY BE
WORKING ON CHANGES TO THEIR PROPOSAL?
~SSuCIA11uh u[ MEIROFuLIIAN MUI~iCIFALIIlES
(STIMATED IIIPACT OF THE GOVERNOR'S eUDGET PROPOSAL
PRELIMINARY -- SEE ATIACNED MEMO FOR DETAILS
APPLE VALLEY
ARDEN HILLS
BAYPORI
RLAINE
BLOOMINGTON
BROO[LYN CENTER
BROOKLYN PAR[
BURNSVILLE
CNAMPLIN
CHANHASSEN
CHAS[A
CIRCLE PINES
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
COON RAPIDS
COTIAGE GROVE
CRYSTAL
DAYTON
· DEEPHAVEH
EAGAH
EDEN PRAIRIE
EDINA
FALCON HEIGHTS
FRIDfEY
GOLDEN VALLEY
HASTINGS
HOPUNS
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS
MAHTOMEDI
HAPLE GROVE
MAPLE#DOD
MEHDOTA HEIGHTS
MINNEAPOLIS
HIHNETOH~A
MOUND
HOUNDS VIEN
NEW BRIGHTON
NE~ NOPE
NORTH ST PAUL
OA[DALE
ORONO
OSSEO
PLYMOUTH
PRIOR LA[E
RAMSEY
RI:HFIELD
ROBBINSDALE
ROSEMOUNT
ROSEVII.LE
SAINT ANTHONY
SAINT FRANOIS
SAINT LOUIS PARE
SAIIIT PAUL
SAINT PAUL PAR&
SAVAGE
SHAEOPFE
SHOREVIE~
SHdRE~O~D
SdUTN ST PAUl
SPRING IA[E PAR[
SPRING PARg
STILLNATER
~&Y?ATA
gE~T ~T PAUl
HOOD/AND
Revenue Est. Perceot Rev. Base
hse Cut Cut After Cut
3787642 309072 8.2! 3478870
8268095 346439 4.2Z 7921656
1508952 0 O.OZ J508952
847897 21567 2.5Z 8263~0
5963657 486634 8.2: 5477023
22529287 0 0.0~ 22529287
7298651 595570 8.2Z 6703081
]1232077 916837 8.2Z 10318840
H941835 317866 2.?~ Ji624269
298JS83 243297 8.2Z 2738286
30J2098 0 O.OZ 30]2098
1464820 ]19508 8.2Z 13450JS
895180 73047 8.2Z 822133
5029738 4J0427 8.2Z 46193JJ
9]3J801 745155 8.2Z 6386646
S32,,T839 434425 8.2Z 4889414
5405523 441091 6.22 4964432
7J]578 32878 4.6~ 678700
916060 0 0.0! 916060
9807752 0 0.0! 9807752
12677803 0 O.OZ 12677803
10369526 0 0.0! 10369526
780728 63707 8.2Z 7]7021
62424~6 5~9387 8.2: 573309~
7021431 18589 0.3~ 7002842
45805~2 373770 8.2: 4206742
5294749 432052 8.2~ 4862697
4740254 386805 8.2Z 4353449
1168027 95311 8.2! 10727]6
7648602 122916 1.6! 7525686
761670] 621523 8.2Z 6995178
2282077 0 0.0! 2282077
]79067845 14611936 8.2! 164455909
126~5379 0 0.0: ]2695379
]905059 ]58483 0.2Z ]749b06
19fl3229 161831 8.21 1821398
3549373 289629 8.2! ~289744
4856392 396282 8.2Z 44601]0
J741034 ]42068 8.2Z 1598966
3393597 2769J8 8.2Z 3116679
1711328 0 0.0~ 1711328
477257 38944 8.2Z 438313
9611837 0 O.OZ 9611837
26366~0 27043 1.0! 2609647
' 1695340 138340 8.2! 1557000
9800685 775256 8.21 8725429
~806306 310595 8.2: 3495711
2798289 228340 8.2Z 2569949
664]658 0 0.0~ 6641688
1705430 127316 7.5: 1578114
488976 25136 5.l~ 463840
12695604 103596l 8.2~ 11659643
JJ9961855 97888G7 8.2! 110172968
]072846 87544 8.22 985302
2115~J4 5023l 2.4! 20653g3
26050~0 J42925 5.5~ 2462J35
4lI93~4 0 0.0~ 41J9334
i?900H 0 0.0~ I790051
e162900 502893 8.2~ 5660007
10693~7 ~72e0 8.2~ 982107
480990 0 0.0; 4809q0
4]~6453 341615 8.2~ 3844838
1538357 0 0.0: 1538357
42~845] 3~220h 8.2: 44]4245
472579l 0 O.P: 4725791
1~5~;~7 0 O.P: J35097
Aid (LGA, Percent
D~A, EA) Cut
Aid After
Cut
]0445]J 29.62 735439
346439 IO0.OZ 0
0 O.OI 0
21567 ]00.0! 0
108485J 44.9I 5982J7
0 0.0~ 0
1647162 3~.21 1051592
1442889 &3.52 526352
317566 lO0.OZ 0
431653 56.42 1883,56
0 O.OZ 0
280680 42.6! 161175
240586 30.4% 167539
1923545 21.~! 1513118
2J91272 34.02 14461J7
906464 47.92 472039
1687778 26.JI 1246687
32878 lO0.OZ 0
0 0.0: 0
0 O.OZ 0
0 0.0! 0
0 O.OZ 0
171127 37.22 107420
1478960 34.4! 969573
18589 100.0: 0
1154055 32.41 780285
762287 ~7! 330235
40747l 94.9! 20666
130200 73.2! 34889
122916 lO0.O~ O
655883 94.G~ 34~0
0 0.02 0
59926160 24.4! 45314224
0 0.0! 0
276184 56.32 120731
5611~2 28.G! 399351
652558 44.42 362929
926657 42.8: 530375
657516 2].62 515448
570198 48.6! 293280
0 0.02 0
52511 74.2: 13567
0 O.OZ 0
27043 ]00.0: 0
275897 50.1: 137557
3015710 25.7~ 2240454
1444054 21.5: 1133459
37055J 6J.b: 14221J
0 0.0: 0
127316 100.0: 0
25136 100.0~ 0
1805307 57.42 769346
38890877 25.22 29101990
41866q 20.9~ 331125
50231 lO0.O: 0
142925 JO0.Ol 0
0 0.0: 0
0 O.Ol 0
2279237 22.1: 1776344
204%4 42.6~ 117704
O O.O: 0
7IISI7 48.02 369902
0 0.0: 0
103874~ 37.8:' 645542
0 0.0: 0
0 O.O: 0