1992-12-17NOTICE OF EMERGENCY CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA WILL MEET IN
EMERGENCY SESSION ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1992, AT 7:45 A.M.
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 5341MAYWOOD ROAD, IN MOUND. THE
MEETING WILL BE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:
CASE $92-073= PAUL LARSON, 5217 WINDSOR ROAD,
LOTS 3 & 4 BLOCK 18, WHIPPLE, PID $25-117-24 21
0051. YARIANC~.
'CASE #92-069: FRANK & ANDREA AHRENS, 4673 ISLAND
VIEW DRIVE, LOT 17 & 1/2 OF 18, BLOCK 1, DEVON,
PID $30-117-23 22 0008. VARIANCE.
Payment Request #4 - 1992 Lift Station Improvement -
$8,007.91.
THIS NOTICE WAS FAXED TO THE FOLLOWING:
THE LAKER
THE SAILOR
MAYOR SKIP JOHNSON
COUNCILMEMBERS LIZ JENSEN
KEN SMITH
THE NOTICE WAS HAND DELIVERED TO THE FOLLOWING:
COUNCILMEMBERS ANDREA AHRENS
PHYLLIS JESSEN
PROPOSED RESOLUTION #92-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE RECOGNIZING
AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A CONFORMING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
AT 4673 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE
LOT 17 AND PART OF 18, BLOCK 1, DEVON
PID #30-117-23 22 0008
P&Z CASE NUMBER 92-069
WHEREAS, the applicants, Frank and Andrea Ahrens, have applied
for a variance to recognize an existing nonconforming accessory
structures (garage) to allow construction of a conforming accessory
structure (gazebo), and
WHEREAS, the existing nonconforming garage was granted a
variance to be constructed in its present location by Resolution
#88-117, and
WHEREAS, there is an existing shed on the property which the
applicant has indicated will be removed, and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-2 Single
Family Residential Zoning District which according to City Code
requires a lot area of 6,000 square feet, a 20 foot front yard
setback, 6 foot side yard setbacks for "Lots of record," a 15 foot
rear yard setback, and accessory buildings require a 4 foot side
and 4 foot rear yard setback in the rear yard, and
WHEREAS, all other setbacks and lot area are conforming, and;
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has reviewed the request and
recommended approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
The City does hereby approve a variance to recognize an
existing nonconforming accessory structure (garage) which has
a front yard setback of 16 feet to the required 20 feet, to
allow construction of a conforming accessory structures
(gazebo).
The city easement must be located in the field by a Registered
Land Surveyor in order to verify the proposed structure does
not encroach into it.
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
CASE ~92-069
PAGE 2
The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below,
pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) of the Zoning Code
with the clear and express understanding that the use remains
as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject ;o all of the
provisions and restrictions of Section 23.40 .
It is determined that the livability of the residential
property will be improved by the authorization of the
following alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to
afford the owners reasonable use of their land:
Construction of a 11.5' x 11.5', octagon shaped
gazebo to be setback 4 feet from the side and rear
property lines.
This variance is granted for the following legally described
property: Lot 17 and the southeasterly 25.00 feet, front and
rear, of Lot 18, in Block 1 of Devon.
This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or
the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to
Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1).
This shall be considered a restriction on how this property
may be used.
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing
this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for
such recording. A building permit for the subject
construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has
been filed with the City Clerk.
MINUTES OF A MF ETING OF THF
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMIF SION
DECEMBER 14, 1992
CASE ~92-069: FRANK & ANDRga ;~WRENSt 4673 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, LOT 17 £~
1/2 OF 18, BLOCK 1, DEVON, PID ~30-117-23 22 0008. VARIANCE.
The Building Official reviewed the applicant's request for a variance to
recognize an existing nonconforming detached accessory structure in
order to construct a conforming gazebo. The existing nonconforming
detached garage was granted a variance to be constructed in its present
location by Resolution #88-117.
The Current zoning code allows the proposed accessory building to be
located within 4' of the rear and side lot lines.
The applicant has had their surveyor locate an existing sewer and water
easement on the survey since the original report was written. It
appears that the gazebo could meet the 4 foot side and rear yard
setbacks without encroaching onto the easement. The gazebo was drawn on
the revised survey by the applicant.
Staff recommended approval of the variance request to allow the gazebo
to be constructed with conforming setbacks.
The Building Official added a comment that the proposed zoning code
modifications and shoreland ordinance would require the gazebo meet a 50
foot setback to the ordinary high water.
Mueller questioned the status of the existing shed. The applicant,
Andrea Ahrens, confirmed that the existing shed will be removed.
Mueller questioned the proposed floor elevation. Sutherland confirmed
that the floor will be elevated and will meet the minimum requirement of
933.5 and the construction will meet code.
The commission discussed the issue that the proposed zoning code
modifications will require that the shed be setback 50 feet from the
ordinary high water. Mueller does not feel the Planning Commission
could deny the request, but would like the City Council to consider this
issue. Jensen pointed out that there is room on the property for the
shed to be placed 50' from the ordinary high water and not be in
conflict with the easement.
MOTION made by Clapsaddle, seconded by Voss to recommend
approval of the variance as recommended by staff with the
condition that the existing shed is to be removed. Motion
carried ? to 1. Those in favor were: Clapsaddle, Mueller,
Johnson, Weiland, Michael, Hanus and ross. Jensen opposed.
Andrea Ahrens stated to the commission that if her property was
conforming she could construct the gazebo as proposed today, and the
reason her property is nonconforming is because a garage was constructed
in a nonconforming location with the City Council's blessing.
,1
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
Prepared for=
~A k/K A ~ R F...I~ s
, * **
L..'..' ' i :""'
%
'%. ~...~ ) %. ¢
o Donoto~ ~ron monumon~
x Denobes c=oss ch&se[ed ~ conc=e[e
x951.5 Denotes existing spot elevation
~ Denotes proposed spot elevation
~ Denotes surface drainage
Dashed contour lines denote proposed features
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 17 and the southeasterly 25.00 feet,
front and rear, of Lot 18, in Block I of
DEVON, according to the plat thereof on
file or of record in the office of the
Registrar of Titles,. Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
GENERAL NOTES:
Proposed top of foundation elev. =
Proposed basement floor elev. =
Proposed garage floor elev. = 950.9
~ENCHMARK:
Solid contour lines denote existing features
ALL- METRO LAND
SURVEYORS
2:540 DQniels Street
Long Lake, MinrtesotQ 55556
Ph: 475-1453
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of
REG. NUMBER 170Z.5
FILE NO.
CITY of MOUND
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364-1687
(612) 472 0690
FAX ,:617 472 0(;20
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
Planning Commission Agenda of December 14, 1992
TO:
FROM;
Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
Jon Sutherland, Building official
SUBJECT:
Variance Request
APPLICANT:
Frank & Andrea Ahrens
CASE NO. 92-069
LOCATION:
4673 Island View Drive, Lot 17 & 1/2 of 18, Block
1, Devon, PID #30-117-23 22 0008
ZONING:
R-2 Single Family Residential
BACKGROUND
The applicants request a variance to recognize an existing
nonconforming detached accessory structure in order to construct a
conforming gazebo on the property.
The existing nonconforming accessory structure was granted a
variance to be constructed in its present location by Resolution
#88-117.
According to the current zoning code, accessory buildings are not
subject to the 50 foot setback from the ordinary high water and may
be located in the rear yard with 4' setbacks to the rear and side
lot lines.
Each application for a permit or variance is typically forwarded to
other departments within the city for review. Sewer and Water
Superintendent, Greg Skinner, has noted that there is a sewer and
water easement on the lakeside of this property and has requested
that the applicant have this easement located on the survey as
structures are not allowed to be placed on city easements.
printed on recycled paper
Staff Report
4673 Island View Drive - Variance Request
Page 2
At the time this report was prepared, the exact location of the
sewer and water easement was unavailable, so placement and
evaluation to the easement could not be reviewed. It is expected
that this information will be available prior to the Planning
Commission Meeting.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the ordinances in effect at the time of application for
this variance, staff recommendation would be that the Planning
Commission recommend approval of the variance request.
After review of the proposed zoning code modifications and
shoreland ordinance, a further stipulation should be considered
that the proposed gazebo be required to meet the 50 foot setback to
the ordinary high water. In addition, I would note that if the
gazebo was less than 120 square feet of projected roof area, it
could be constructed without a permit and be placed less than the
proposed ordinary high water setback under the current code.
This case will be heard by the Planning Commission on December 14,
1992 and by the City Council on January 12, 199~. The abutting
neighbors have been notified of this request.
JS:pj
revised 4/2/92
RECEIVED
NOV 1 9 1992
VARIANe "i ICATION
CITY OF MOUND
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone: 4?2-0600, Fax: 4?2-0620
Planning Commission Date:
City Council Date:
Site Visit Scheduled:
Application Fee: $50.00
Case No.
Zoning Sheet Completed:
Copy to City Planner:
Copy to Public Works:
Copy to city Engineer:
Please type or print the following information:
Address of Subject Prope. rty /'~7,~ ~-"~/~~
Owner's Name&~~~/~ ~<S Day Phone
Owner's Address ~7~ '~/~~ ~ff~
ddress
~~ Day Phone
BEG~B DESCRIPTIO~:
Addition ~/O~ PID No.-¢
Zoning District ~-- ~ Use of Property: ~"~~ ~'~ ~1'/~
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use
permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ~ yes, ( ) no. If
yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and
provide copies of resolutions.
1. Detailed descripton of proposed construction or alteration (size, number
of stories, type of use, etc;):
revised 4/2/92
Variance Application
Page 2
SETBACKS:
Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and
setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located?
Yes (), No ~.). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe
reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.)
required r
(or~ VARIANCE
Front Yard: (~S E W )
Rear Yard: ( N~E W )
Lake Front: ( N S E W )
Side Yard: ( N S E__W )
Side Yard: ( N S E W )
Lot Size: ~
Street Frontage
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
I~OO0 sq ft lJ.~O0~ sq ft sq ft
ft. ' ~.~ ft. ft.
Does the present use of the property conform to a~ regulations for the
zoning district in which it is located? Yes ), No ( ). If no,
specify eachnon-conforminguse:
Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent
its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning
district?
( ) too narrow ~) topography ( ) soil
( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing
( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify
Please describe:
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having
property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted
(1982)? Yes (), No (~. If yes, explain
revised 4/2/92
Variance Application
Page 3
Case No.
Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the
relocation of a road? Yes (), No~). If y.s, explain
7. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance pe~.uliar
only to the property described in this petition? Yes (), No ~). If
no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
8..Comments:' ~' ~:~,'~ ~~ ~~~0' ~
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in
any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate.
I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application
by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of
inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be
:equired by law.
_1
STRiNG"'~
2X0
?ERIMETEK
JOISTS
INTERNAL
HEADER
2x6
RADIAL
JOIST
CENTER
POST
BATTER
BOARDS
NOTCH
JOIST
HANGERS
6 x 6 POST
DECKING
.r
OVERVIEW OF GAZEBO DECK
(3ut off
on the lonf
planes to form
oylinde~.
---'J 1-1/2"
TOP
VIEW 1-1/2"
CUT OFF
ARRISES
16"
Rafter lenrth
is equ~l to the
dlst&noe
stepped-off,
minus h~lf the
hub width, plus
desired over-
ho. ng lenrth.
·
BUILD
.~t.,-~ CENTER OF
../" I JHUB
76-1/4" -/ '/" /'~
. /;-:.m "'" ' 4~' ." ;~./ RAFTER HUB
: 16~ OVER. HA NG q
COPPER
FLASHING
HUB
4X6 CAP PLATE
2X6 RAFTER
ASPHALT SHINGLES
FELT
TONGU'
& GROOV~
~HEATHIN(
lX~, FASCIA
PLUM~ CUT
6X6 POSTS
LATTICE
(ON 5
WALLS)
LATTICE
SKIRT
ON ALL
6 SIDES
NAILER
FOR
LATTICE
6"FROM
GROUND
CLIP
CONCRETE
FOOTING
DECKING
ATTACH
STAIRS
BETWEEN
POSTS
209
Aug~gst 23, 1988
RESOLUTION. 88-117
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE
FOR LOT 17 & S.E. 1/2 OF 18, BLOCK 1, DEVON;
PID %30-117-23-22-0008
(4673 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE)
P&Z CASE NO. 88-724
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a front yard setback
variance to construct a detached garage 17 feet from the prin-
cipal structure, 4 feet from the side lot line, and 14 feet from
the front property line, for lot 17 and the S.E. 1/2 of 18, block
1, Devon; PID #30-117-23-22-0008; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-2
single family zoning district, which is lakeshore property,
requiring a 20 foot front yard setback and a 4 foot side yard
setback for detached accessory buildings; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of
this variance due to the topography of the lot and to afford the
property owner reasonable use of their land.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mound, MN, as follows:
That the City does hereby authorize the nonconforming acces-
sory structure setback at 4673 Island View Drive; PID #30-'
117-23-22-0008.
The City Council authorizes the setback variance, pursuant
to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and
express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, non-
donforming use, subject to all of the provisions and
restrictions of Section 23.404.
It is determined that the 6 foot front yard setback variance
will afford the owner reasonable use of their land due to
the topography of the lot; the improvement is hereby
authorized for the following alterations:
Construction of a detached accessory building 24' x 24' in
size, 4 feet from the side lot line, 14 feet from the street
property line, and removal of the existing detached acces-
sory building, conditioned upon the submission of a
registered land survey of the property indicating the cor-
ners of the proposed garage elevation, the proposed eleva-
tion at the front of the garage, and the elevations at the
1
210
August 23, 1988
corner of the existing lot.
This variance is granted for the following legally described
property.
Lot 17 & S.E. 1/2 of 18, Block 1, Devon
PID #30-117-23-22-0008
This variance shall be recorded with the county recorder or
the registrar of titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Min-
nesota Statute Section 462.3595, Subdivision 4.
This shall be considered a restriction on how this property
may be used.
Se
The property owner shall have the responsibility for filing
this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs
for such recording. The building permit shall not be issued
until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Jensen and seconded by Councilmember Johnson.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Councilmember Abel was absent and excused.
Attest: city Clerk
PROPOSED RESOLUTION #92-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE;~FRONT Y~RD SETBACK VARIi~CE
FOR 5217 WINDSOR ROAD
LOTS 3 and 4, BLOCK 18, ~HIPPLE, PID #25-117-24 21 0051
P&S CASE NUN~ER 92-073
W~ER~AS, the applicant, Paul Larson, has applied for a 10
foot front yard setback variance to the required 30 foot setback to
allow construction of a new single family dwelling, and
W~EREAS, the subject property is located within the R-3 Single
Family Residential Zoning District which according to City Code
requires a lot area of 6,000 square feet, a 30 foot front yard
setback, 6 foot side yard setbacks for "Lots of record," and a 15
foot rear yard setback, and
W~ER~AS, all other setbacks proposed and lot area are
conforming, and
W~ER~AS, there are other houses in this neighborhood that are
setback closer than 30 feet to the front property line, and
WHEREAS, due to the topography of this property it would be
advantages for construction reasons to have to house located closer
to the front property line, and
W~EREAS, The Planning Commission has reviewed the request and
unanimously recommended approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
The city does hereby approve a 10 foot front yard setback
variance to the required 30 foot setback to allow construction
of a new single family dwelling at 5217 Windsor Road.
The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below,
pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) of the Zoning Code
with the clear and express understanding that the use remains
as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the
provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404.
It is determined that the livability of the residential
property will be improved by the authorization of the
following alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to
afford the owners reasonable use of their land:
Construction of a new single family dwelling to be
setback 20 feet from the front property line.
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
CASE #92-073
PAGE 2
This variance is granted for the following legally described
property: Lots 3 and 4, Block 18, Whipple.
This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or
the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to
Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1).
This shall be considered a restriction on how this property
may be used.
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing
this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for
such recording. A building permit for the subject
construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has
been filed with the City Clerk.
MINUTES OF A lVlEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 1992
CASE ~92-073= P/%UL LARSON, 5217 WINDSOR ROAD, LOTS 3 & 4 BLOCK 18,
WHIPPLE, PID ~25-117-24 21 0051. VARIANCE.
The Building Official reviewed the applicant's request for a setback
variance of 10 feet to the required 30 foot front yard setback in the R-
3 zone. The subject lot is undeveloped and the adjacent homes are also
located less than the required 30 foot setback.
The topography of the lot slopes towards the rear and getting the house
as close as possible to the front facilitates the construction and
placement of the house on the property.
Staff recommended approval of the 10 foot variance to the required 30
foot front yard setback in order to allow construction of anew single
family dwelling.
The Building Official added that if the proposed zoning code
modifications are adopted, the house would be conforming with a 20 foot
front yard setback.
MOTION made by ross, seconded by Hanus, to recommend approval
of the variance as recommended. The Planning Commission finds
that the proposed 20 foot front yard setback is consistent
with the neighborhood and due to the topography of the
property it is more beneficial for construction purposes to
have the house constructed closer to the street. Motion
carried unanimously.
CITY of MOUND
STAFF REPORT
534i MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364 1687
(612) 472-0600
FAX ~612) 472 0620
DATE:
TO:
FROM;
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
CASE NO.
LOCATION:
ZONING:
Planning Commission Agenda of December 14, 1992
Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
Jon Sutherland, Building Official
Variance Request
Paul La rson--~~ .
92-073
5217 Windsor Road, Lots 3 & 4, Block 18, Whipple,
PID #25-117-24 21 0051
R-3 Single Family Residential
BACKGROUND
The applicant is seeking a setback variance of 10 feet to the
required 30 foot front yard in the R-3 zone. The subject lot is
undeveloped and the adjacent homes are also located less than the
required 30 foot setback.
The topography of the lot slopes towards to rear and getting the
house as close as possible to the front facilitates the
construction and placement of the house on the property.
The proposed zoning code modifications, if adopted, would result in
the house being conforming with respect to the 10 foot front yard
variance.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommendation is for approval of a 10 foot variance to the
required 30 foot front yard setback in order to allow construction
of a new single family dwelling.
This case will be heard by the Planning Commission on December 14,
1992, and by the City Council on ?.
JS:pj
printed on recycled paper
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Telephone
612/476-6010
612/476-8532 FAX
December 4, 1992
Engineers
Planners
Surveyors
Mr. Jon Sutherland
Planning and Zoning
City of Mound
5341Ma~ood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT:
City of Mound, Minnesota
Lots 3 & 4, Block 18, Whipple
Case #92-073
Variance Application
MFRA #8902
Dear Jon:
As requested, we have reviewed the above referenced variance request. We
have no objection to the actual variance; however, we would like to caution the
applicant regarding the difference in elevation between the City manhole and
the proposed basement floor. The manhole invert elevation will need to be
field verified before a building permit can be issued.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
us.
Very truly yours,
McCOMJ~S FRANK R00S ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Cameron
JC:jmk
An Equal Oppodun,ty Employer
revised 4/2/92
NOV 3 0 1992
VARIANCE APPLICATION
CITY OF HOUND
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone: 472-0600, Fax: 472-0620
Planning Commission Date:
City Council Date:
Site Visit Scheduled:
Application Fee: $50.00
Case No.
Zoning Sheet Completed:
Copy to City Planner:
Copy to Public Works: '
Copy to City Engineer:
Please type or print the following information:
Address of Subject Property
Owner's Name ~4//~Z7-~-{~ C/::J.~,~.5/,%'v/ Day Phone
Owner's Address ~"~'/ZO /~{/~/~ C~6/~) ~ W/~3
Applicant's Name (if other than owner) ~/~O.'~ L/~,~$K.A/
Address /~ ~/~C5~,~/~ '$~/~d~~=~~4~ Day Phone
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Block /'~
Addition ,~(~O['~_
Zoning District
PID No.
Use of Property:
~ ~//v 39'2 / ~¢-? 5-1
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use
permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, (w) no. If
yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and
provide copies of resolutions.
Detailed descripton of proposed construction or alteration (size, number
of stories, type of use, etc. ) :._ ,~,/~/,b .~/~ /f~,~ ~;(~
revised 4/2/92
Variance Application
~age 2
Case No. qc~'OU8
Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and
setback regulation~ for the zoning district in which it is located?
Yes (), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe
reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.)
SETBACKS: required requested VARIANCE
(or existing)
Front Yard: (~ S E W )
Rear Yard: ( N S E W )
Lake Front: ( N S E W )
Side Yard: ( N S E W )
Side Yard: ( N S E W )
Lot Size:
Street Frontage
ft. ~o ft. /~ ft.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
ft. ft. ft.
sq ft sq ft sq ft
ft. ft. ft.
Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the
zoning district in which it is located? Yes (~), No ( ). If no
specify each non-conforming use: '
Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent
its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning
district?
( ) too narrow (X) topography ( ) soil
( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing
( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify
Please describe: 'F~'~
Be
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having
property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted
(1982)? Yes (), No (). If yes, explain
revised 4/2/92
Variance Application
Page 3
Case No. q~-~
e
Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the
relocation of a road? Yes (), No (). If yes, explain
Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar
only to the property described in this petition? Yes (), No (). If
no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
8. Comments:
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in
any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate.
I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application
by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of
inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be
required by law.
Applicant's Signature ~~~ Date {/-~0--~
0 ')~'.
('(-rti fieat~ of Survey
o£ T,~t,~ 3 and a, Rloek 1R~ ~H1PIH,t]
Honneptn County, HJnnes(~ta
'1'
Existino Le~] Description
Lots 3 an0 d. Block 18, WIIIPPLE.
This survey, ~;hows the 1. ocation ~f a mro[~osed house in ro}ntion
(9,4.,) : E×Jstin¢] elevation
~ : Prnpo:;e¢l elevation
Dm*~)m: C~ty of .]olmd
.... _~zz~ ~q~ncbor ~ocxc_J
~ ) = f:,',~,'~/~a~ ~,e~,~ ~eiqhboc -fo qbe ~
Certificate of Survey
0 ~ ~'~ ~ ~ for Husaman Investment Co.
of 'Lots 1 and 2, Block 18, ~'bipple
Hennepin County, ~ktnnesota
I hereby certify that this is" '
a true and correct representation
of a survey of the boundaries of
Lots 1 and 2, Block 18, ~blnole, and the location of all existing
buildings, if any, thereon. It does not pumport to sho~ other
improve.-.ents or encroachments.
Scale:' 1" = 30'
Date : 5-15-B0
o : Iron marker
~ordon R. Coffin ,'. ~'o. 606~"
Dand Surveyor and Planner'
bong Lake, Minnesota ,,
66437
SU~YFOn, Zachmari ~k)mes
DESCmII0 A$~ Lots 5,6,& 12, Block 18, WHIPPLE , City of Mound, Hennepin
County, Mir~nesota and reserving the drainage and utility easements
as shown on the record plat thereof.
1
I
I
L ,2, '
I hereby certt~y that on q/,',/:,~ X .~rveyed t~ pro~rty deicrtbed,abov.
and that the above plat to a correct repre.entatton of .atd .urvey.
Calvin ~. Hed~ufld, Mtnn. les. No.
I i
II
II
II
II
............. J, L .-r'~ r
II
II
II
II
II
II
u
'ouI
.:.'~b?~[/T,.~..~
- ' r:' '-" ~ ': '"'
[~-Jq~cl + · ~t!uq-~A u'oqdoq. S
:~o3 p~uf!s~Q
"I;'90LO00
'~quoq:~UU!N
-~gqwnN -~gpl!n~l
OOJzO- ~/__'~
ggLUOFl uosd~"l
l
N
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447,
Telephone
612/476-6010
612/476-8532 FAX
December 15, 1992
Engineers
Planners
Surveyors
Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT:
City of Mound, Minnesota
1992 Lift Station Improvements
Payment Request No. 4
MFRA #9868
Dear Ed:
Enclosed is Gridor's Payment Request No. 4 for work completed through
December 1, 1992, on the subject project. The amount of this payment request
is $8,007.91. We have reviewed this request, find that it is in order and
recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
us.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS FRANK R00S ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Cameron
JC:jmk
Enclosures
An Equal Opportunity Employer