1993-02-23 ~ ~M N A~~~. The City of Mound, through
teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality
services that respond to the needs of all ltlzens, fostering a
safe, attractive and flourishing community, c' '
AGENDA
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINN~OTA
_M._OUND crr~ COUNCIL - REGULAR
7.50 P.M., TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, l~3M~G
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 9, 1993
REGULAR MEETING. ,
PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF RECOGNITION TO
BRET NICCUMAND MURRAY SINNER, FOR THEIR EFFORTS
IN SAVING THE LIFE OF A SNOWMOBILER WHO WENT
THROUGH THE ICE ON LAKE MINNETONKA IN DECEMBER.
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE FROM SENATOR GEN OLSON
AND REPRESENTATIVE STEVE SMITH· PG. 634
~UBLIC HEARINO: ZONING CODE MODIFICATIONS/SHORELAND
MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE. SEE INSERT
BID AWARD: GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING
BONDS, SERIES 1993A. PG. 635-648
1993 COMMERCIAL INSURANCE PROGRAM - CARL BENNETSEN,
R.L. YOUNGDAHL & ASSOCIATES. PG. 649
CA~E #95-003: JOHN & JANET PAGE, 1927 LAKESIDE
LANE, LOT 10, BLOCK 1, SHADYWOOD
POINT.
PG. 619-631
PG. 632-633
10.
REQUEST: VARIANCE .
1992 DEPARTMENT HEAD ANNUAL REPORTS:
- JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER
- LEN HARRELL, POLICE CHIEF
- JON SUTHERLAND, BUILDING OFFICIAL
- FRAN CLARK, CITY CLERK
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT.
PG. 650-677
PG. 678-680
PG. 681-740
PG. 741-761
PG. 762-777
61__6
11. APPROVAL OF LICENSE RENEWALS.
CIGARETTE LICENSE - HARRISON BAY MOBIL
GARBAGE HAULERS LICENSE - NITTI SANITATION/BFi
12. SET PUBLIC HERAING FOR YEAR XIX, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM.
(SUGGESTED DATE~ NARCH 23, 1993).
13. APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR. PG. 778
14. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION
FOR AN INCENTIVE GRANT FOR RECYCLING. PG. 779-782
15. RESOLUTION THANKING THE MOUND POLICE RESERVES FOR
THEIR WORK AND ASSISTANCE TO THE MOUND POLICE
DEPARTMENT.
16.
PG. 783
SET DATE FOR BID OPENING FOR 1993 SEAL COAT BIDS.
(SUGGESTED DATE: APRIL 13, 1993 PG. 784
17. PAYMENT OF BILLS
PG. 785-803
18. !NFORMATION/MISCELLANEOU~
A. LMCD Mailings.
Be
Ce
Letters from Triax Cablevision RE:
- Sun Outages
- Door to door solicitation for
cable service
Letter from Jan Haugen, former Mayor of
Shorewood requesting support for appointment
to MWCC.
Pg. 804-805
PG. 806
PG. 807
De
PG. 808
Monday, March 1, 1993, 6 P.M., City Hall -
Economic Development Commission has scheduled
an Appreciation Reception for the Mayor,
City Council, Advisory Commissions and members
of the Mound Visions Team to formally thank
the Teams and all participants for all of
their hard work in developing the Mound
Visions Program and specifically, the
promotional packet. Team members will be given
copies of the packet at that time and an update
of the project will be given by the EDC and
Staff. Please mark your calendar.
REMINDER: Tuesday, March 2, 1993 - Goal Setting
Session for Mayor and City Council - 6:15 P.M.
City Hall. ,
F®
Ge
LMC Legislative Conference - Thursday,
March 18, 1993, St. Paul Radisson. If you
are interested in attending, please let
Fran know ASAP.
LMCD Lake Area Task Force information on
potential boat/trailer parking spaces in
the area of Mound Bay Park.
Planning Commission Minutes - February 8,
1993.
Park & Open Space Commission Minutes -
February 11, 1993.
PG. 809-814
PG. 815-823
PG. 824-827
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUis~Y 9, 1993
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, February 9, 1993, in the Council
Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Skip Johnson, Councilmembers Andrea
Ahrens, Liz Jensen, and Ken Smith. Councilmember Phyllis Jessen
was absent and excused. Also present were: City Manager Edward J.
Shukle, Jr., city Clerk Fran Clark, City Attorney Curt Pearson,
city Planner Mark Koegler, City Engineer John Cameron, Building
official Jon Sutherland, Park Director Jim Fackler, Sewer & Water
& Street Supt. Greg skinner, Fire chief Don Bryce, Downtown visions
Planner Bruce Chamberlain, and the following interested citizens:
Joe Fleischhacker, Jeffrey Winter, Chris Jensen, Adan Graffunder,
Peter Graffunder, Raymond Jones, Vanny Palm, Julie Jensen, Mark &
Julie Lilledahl, Shelly Dorion, Don Heesen, Ron DeVinney, Stan
Drahos, Fred Guttormson, Jerry Longpre, Judy Bryce, Dave & Gloria
Briggs, Jim Bedell, John Gabos, Vince Forystek, shirley Hatcher,
Ruth Ann Weber, Lucy Steer, Mrs. Moy, Don Noack, Michael Durell,
Ruben Hartman, Glenn Melena, Peter Meyer, Jim Brunzell, Brad
Biermann, Todd Rask, John Edewaard, Tom Casey, Kevin Sipprell, Tim
Palm, Liz & Randy Engelhart, Frank Weiland, Mark Brewer, Dave
Laube, Bob Longnecker, Mark & Julie Lilledahl.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance,
especially the Weeblo Cub Scout Pack #285, Dens 9 & 10. The Mayor
asked that they lead the Pledge of Allegiance.
1.0 MINUTES
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Ahrens to approve the
Minutes of the January 26, 1993, Regular Meeting, as
submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
1.1 PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF RECOGNITION
The Mayor presented Certificates of Recognition to Randy Engelhart,
Tim Palm and Kevin Sipprell, for their efforts in saving the life
of a snowmobiler who went through the ice on Lake Minnetonka in
December.
1.2 PUBLIC HEARING: CASE ~92-072: CONSIDER A REQUEST TO VACATE
A PORTION OF WINDSOR ROAD ABUTTING 3233 TUXEDO BLVD. t MARK &
JULIE LILLEDAHL
The Building official explained the request. He further explained
that the City Engineer recommended only vacating the right-of-way
adjacent to Lots 16 and 17, and retaining utility and drainage
easements. The Planning Commission recommended denial on a 5-2
vote.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
The following persons spoke against the vacation: Ruben Hartman
and Glenn Melena. Don Heezen spoke in favor of the vacation.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
The Council discussed the vacation and whether it was in the public
interest to vacate this street.
HOTION made b~ Smith, seconded by Johnson.to deny the request
of Hark & Julle Lillidahl, for the vacation of Windsor Road
abutting Lots 16 & 17, Block 13, Whipple. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Hotion carried.
1.3 PMENT
~ 0118
~ETOD~s!~~ PLAT FOR P_LANIFED DEVELOPMENT AREA,
The Mayor stated that there was another possibility that a
neighborhood organization would be formed to attempt to purchase
this property and maintain it as a park. He then asked if there
was someone present representing the neighborhood.
The Mayor asked that this discussion to limited to the possibility
of acquiring the property as a park, etc.
Tom Casey stated the neighbors have not raised the funds to
purchase the property. He stated they are in the process of
forming a nonprofit corporation, called the Westonka Conservation
Society and a lot of their efforts have been toward organizing that
and they haven't raised the money to do it.
Mr. Casey stated that he has included in the packet a proposed
resolution that he would like the Council to adopt tonight. In
essence the resolution is asking that the City say that the
property is worth saving and the City will continue to explore the
use of City funds. This would help their fund raising efforts.
Mr. Casey stated he is willing to spend the time to organize the
corporation and there are people willing to sit on the board of
directors. He stated at this time he has no idea how much money
could be raised.
The Council had no comment on the proposed resolution at this time.
The Mayor stated that by passing the proposed preliminary plat
resolution doesn't preclude anytime that Mr. Casey or the neighbors
have talked about as far a trying to keep the property in the state
it is in. Those possibilities still exist but the City is faced
with a time frame constraint by law. The City has an application
for a PDA and a preliminary plat for the same and the City has 120
days from the date of application to act on this. Otherwise it
passes on its own. The Mayor then asked if the date of the
application has been established? The Planner responded that the
very earliest date can be fixed at the end of October 1992 and that
accounts for the 2 week delay when Mr. Weber voluntarily withdrew,
so that would be 120 days beyond the end of October. Around March
1, 1993, would be the deadline.
The Planner asked to make a few comments on the proposed
resolution:
Page 464, Item #1 references Exhibit A. The City has
been supplied with a more up-to-date Exhibit A and
propose to substitute that for the one that is in the
packet. It shows the correct street alignments and
Outlot lettering, etc.
Propose to add the following items:
17. Approval of Title by the City Attorney.
18.
The Developer is to sign a Development Contract and
furnish to the City a performance bond in an amount 125%
of the cost of the improvements to cover grading,
drainage, utility and street construction as per plans
approved by the City Engineer.
The Planner also brought up the Park Dedication requirement. When
the Park Commission reviewed this, they recommended park dedication
cash in lieu of land in the amount of $500 per lot which is the
minimum under the ordinance. At that time, they did not have any
idea what the value of the property was. Since that time there
have been several figures on value of the property, all in excess
of $200,000. If this is true, that park dedication fee would run
around $2,200 per lot in lieu of $500 per lot. If the Council
wants to modify the park dedication amount they will have to modify
Item #6 to reflect any change.
The Planner then stated if the Council moves forward with the plat,
then on Page 473-C, there is a proposed resolution which is a
statement of findings of fact for the purpose of documenting the
EAW.
The Council discussed the Park Dedication fee. Councilmember
Ahrens stated when this came before the Park Commission there was
no value to tie it to. She stated the Commission was more
interested in getting cash in lieu of land.
The Council asked that the Park Commission really study any future
development that may come before them when dealing with the Park
Dedication Fee.
The City Attorney suggested one other item be added to the proposed
resolution as follows:
19.
A comprehensive search shall be performed to identify any
existing wells on the property. A licensed well driller
shall properly abandon any unused wells in the plat.
Such abandonment shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Engineer.
The following persons spoke with regard to the proposed
subdivision:
TOM CASEY - commented that the values he submitted were from
the developer and the park dedication fee should be increased.
He stated he feels that fee should be 10% of the market value.
He submitted another letter dated February 5, 1992, from the
Minnesota Historical Society. He stated they feel there is a
high potential for Indian burial grounds and they recommend an
on-site study.
He also submitted another letter dated February 8, 1993, from
a person who has an M.A. in archeology, who recommends that
the State Historic Preservation Office be contacted so that
they can insure that archeological sites are located and
protected. .This person's estimate of the cost of an on-site
survey is $500.00.
He stated that they would like a more detailed response to
their letter of January 26, 1993.
He also asked that there be another hearing on whether or not
the conditions in the preliminary plat resolution have been
met.
BRAD BIERMANN, 5106 Windsor Road - stated that the retaining
walls are a big issue to him because they are in front of his
home.
JIM BRUNSELL, 5111 Windsor Road - stated he is in support of
purchasing the property and would like to see a referendum to
let the voters decide. He stated he would live with whatever
decision the voters choose.
Glenn Melena - stated as far as the Park Dedication Fees go,
Mr. Weber is setting the price and he is setting a high price
and he should have to stand by the price that he has set.
The Mayor stated that he was at the meeting last week and Mr. Weber
was pushed into defending some kind of price. Mr. Weber stated
that was not the asking price.
Discussion on the Park Dedication Fees.
Smith moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #93-20
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MOUND GI~.~-NTING PRELIMINARY PL~T
APPROVALv APPROVAL OF A PLANNED
I I I
DEVELOPMENT AREAv AND LOT AND STREET
DESIGN VARIANCES FOR TEAL POINTE WITH THE
ADDITION OF l?v 18 & 19 & THE CHANGE IN
EXHIBIT A
The Council discussed the Indian artifacts and possible need
to do more investigation. They stated they were under the
impression that there was more on this in the EAW than there
is. The Planner suggested that #3 in the resolution could be
amended as follows: "The Developer shall supply an
archeological on-site survey of the site prepared by a firm or
individual with credentials approved by the Minnesota
Historical society or State Archaeologist's Office." Mr.
Weber stated that while it is true that the EAW only requires
checking a box, the State Archaeologist's office or whoever is
handling that action will receive the EAW and make the same
comments as they would if we asked them directly. If they
feel a survey is required they will recommend that and that
would be part of the response from the State with the EAW. He
stated he wants to respond to the EAW to the letter of the law
and the Council will get those findings in return. The
Planner stated he that if the Council wants to make sure that
the issue of Indian Mounds is covered, that it is reasonable
to include a provision that says an on-site survey should be
performed.
The Council discussed #3 in the resolution. They decided to
let the State make the decision on whether an on-site survey
is necessary. Mr. Weber stated that he believes that the
City reviews the results of the EAW from the State as well as
public input and decides whether their is any potential
significant environmental impact and can take further action
based on those findings. The Planner stated that is done so
that if the Council finds certain items are incomplete and
need further investigation, they could then require an on-site
survey.
The Planner stated that this project does not even come close
to meeting the EAW threshold, so basically the State would say
the project does not need an EAW. So, consequently, how the
City handles the Indian Mound issue is up to the City after
they receive the EAW.
The Council asked the Planner how long the EAW process will
take. The Planner stated there is a finite time line that is
defined by the rules. He will get back to the Council on
this.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.4 Johnson moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION J93-21
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MOUND DETERMINING THE REQUIREMENT
FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONHENTAL
ASSESSHENT WORKSHEET (EAW) FOR THE
PROPOSED TEAL POINTE SUBDIVISION PURSU]~
TO M.8. 116D.04
The Mayor read the proposed resolution.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
The Mayor explained that the Council has been asked to adopt a
resolution in support of preserving Teal Pointe. He then read the
proposed resolution. After discussion the Council decided to move
#1 and #2 up and make them Whereas,. They also changed #3 to read
as follows:
"The City of Mound will continue to explore its ability to
cv..tr.but~ to facilitat______gethe purchase of Teal Pointe from the
developer to preserve as natural green space.',
Smith asked if this binds the Council to anything. The City
Attorney stated he did not think so, that as it stands the
resolution is rather innocuous.
1.5 Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #93-22 RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF PRESERVING TEAL
POINTE AS REVISED
The vote was 3 in favor with Smith voting nay. Motion carried.
The Council made it clear that they are not contributing City funds
to this at this time, but they are willing to continue to
facilitate.
1.6 CASE ~93-001: JOHN GABO8, 4687 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, LOT 19 £
BW~Y 1/2 OF 18, BLOCK 1, DEVON, PID #30-117-23 22 0009,
yARIANCE TO ADD A STAIRWAY AND DECK ON TOP OF AN EXISTING NON~
CONFORMING BOAT~OUSR
The Building Official explained that the applicant is requesting
this to improve the safety of the current boathouse. He has had a
problem with children climbing on the roof. The Planning
Commission reviewed the request and on a motion for approval the
vote was 5-3 against the proposal. The Building Official reviewed
the Planning Commission Minutes with their comments and
suggestions. Councilmember Jensen, Planning Commission Liaison,
stated that she voted against approval because it is not the
minimum variance.
Mr. Gabos was present and stated the request is specifically based
on a safety concern. Children from the neighborhood play on top of
the boathouse and he is afraid someone will fall off. Mr. Gabos
stated the boathouse was built in 1982 or 1984 and had permits from
the City. He also stated that he feels his proposal meets the
I I I
criteria in Section 325 for variances and also is in line with the
City of Mound Mission Statement. He then reviewed Section 325.
Mr. Gabos stated that the Building Official told him that his
proposal would not extend or diminish the life of the structure.
He read the definition of the boathouse in the Code.
The City Attorney stated that the boathouse was not built in 1982
or 1984. It was repaired with permits during those years because
of a lawsuit with the previous owner because of damage caused by a
leaking storm sewer.
Mr. Gabos contended that he has 2 surveys, one from 1979 when the
boathouse was 24' x 16', and a current one which shows the
boathouse at 25' x 17.6'.
The Council discussed what a minimum variance is and what other
alternatives would be to make the boathouse safe.
Mayor Johnson stated he does not feel this is a minimum variance or
is it the only alternative. He fails to see how adding a stairway,
railing and decking would not create an attractive nuisance for all
the children in the neighborhood to be on it. He stated he could
see the Building Official's recommendation for a guardrail being
installed on the north side of the boathouse to keep people off.
Councilmember Smith stated a railing is to keep people from falling
off a structure. The decking would be flush to the roof and he did
not see that it increases a nonconforming use. This would stop
anyone from falling through the roof.
Councilmember Jensen stated the boathouse is an existing
nonconforming structure and by adding what has been requested will
add to the use of the nonconforming structure. She felt that a
minimum variance required to alleviate the hardship would be
something to keep people from using the top of the structure.
Then you would not have to worry about falling off the other end
because they would not have gotten on it in the first place. That
would be the minimum variance that would alleviate the safety
situation. If, indeed, the concern is that great for the safety,
then the boathouse could be removed because it is a nonconforming
structure.
Councilmember Ahrens stated that there is a safety issue here and
at the Planning Commission Meeting there were all kinds of
suggestions to alleviate the problem, ie. boathouse torn down,
could be re-landscaped so that there wasn't access to the roof of
the structure. She stated that there is watermain just behind the
boathouse which would prohibit Mr. Gabos from excavating behind it
to make it inaccessible to children. She stated that she does not
believe what is being requested increases the life of the
boathouse. The proposal doesn't increase hardcover and it solves
a safety problem that is pleasing to the eye. She stated she is
concerned about looking at solving safety problems without any
regard to how it makes the neighborhood look.
Councilmember Jensen suggested that aesthetically he could put up
a guardrail to prevent people from getting on top the roof and it
doesn't have to go totally around the structure and it doesn't have
to include decking to be attractive.
Councilmember Ahrens stated she feels that the railing would serve
as a climbing aid to get onto the roof, therefore the railing
almost needs to be around the entire perimeter.
Greg Knutson, 4701 Island View Drive - neighbor to Mr. Gabos. He
stated he is the one who brought up the safety factor last year
because of the children. He stated a railing is an absolute must
and he couldn't see just a partial railing because kids could fall
off the edges that do not have railing. From the aesthetic
standpoint, he would like to see some decking on it so that it does
not look like the project is half done and was never finished.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to direct Staff to
prepare a resolution of denial based on the request not being
the minimum variance, that there are other alternatives.
Mayor Johnson stated that he woUld not have a problem with a
railing all the way around the structure to keep people off of
the building. He stated he failed to see how all of the items
requested are needed to alleviate a safety issue.
The vote was Z in favor with Ahrens and Smith voting nay.
Motion fails.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Ahrens to continue this
item until the March 9, 1993, Regular Meeting (when all five
Councilmembers are present and the applicant can return), with
direction to the Building Official to work with the applicant
for alternatives to consider to resolve the safety issue as it
relates to the boathouse. The vote was unanimously in favor.
Motion carried.
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
There were none.
1.7 1992 DEPARTMENT HEAD ANNUAL ~PORT~
The following Department Heads presented their annual reports to
the City Council: Park Director Jim Fackler; Sewer, Water & Street
Supt. Greg Skinner; and Fire Chief Don Bryce.
1.8 DISCUSSION: MOUND ENVIRONN~NTAL & APPEARANCE MODEr.
Bruce Chamberlain, Consultant to the EDC, presented the Mound
Environmental & Appearance Model to the Council. This is trying to
put forth a design vision for downtown Mound. The EDC with input
from everyone has worked to fine tune it. The way the wording has
changed was to soften the ways things were said. Mr. Chamberlain
I I I
asked if the Council had any changes they would like to make.
The Council complimented the Economic Development Commission and
stated they are very excited about the Model. The consensus was to
proceed.
1.9 DISCUSSION: PETITION FOR NO PARKING SIGNS FROM RESIDENTS ON
FAIRVIEW LANE - WEST SIDE OF STREET
The City Manager explained that a petition has been received with
this request. The Police have looked at the situation and
recommends that "No Parking" signs be installed on the West side of
Fairview Lane from County Road 15 to Bartlett Blvd.
Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION ~93-Z3 RESOLUTION TO APPROFE e~NO Pi%RKING~ ON THE
WEST SIDE OF FAIRVIEW LANE FROM COUNTY
ROAD 15 SOUTH TO BARTLETT BLVD.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.10 DISCUSSION: PETITION FOR STOP SIGN AT MAYWOOD AND FAIRVIEW
LANE FROM RESIDENTS OF FAIRVIEW LANE
The City Manager explained that a petition has been received
requesting stop signs at Maywood Road and Fairview Lane. The
Police Chief looked into the State manual as far as what is
required by warrants and based upon what has been proposed, this
area does not meet the State warrants. This information was given
to Mr. Longnecker, but he still feels that based on the number of
children in the area and a lot of speeding cars cutting between
Bartlett Blvd. and County Road 15, there needs to be stop signs to
slow the traffic down. The following persons agreed with Mr.
Longnecker: Dave Laube and David Briggs.
Smith moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #93-24
RESOLUTION TO INSTALL STOP SIGNS ON
MAYWOOD ROAD AT FAIRVIEW LANE AND ON
FAIRVIEW LANE AT MAYWOOD ROAD
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.11 DISCUSSION: MID BLOCK CROSSWALKS
The City Manager explained that since the fatal accident in
December there have been several discussions on the mid-block
crosswalks in Mound. The Council met with Hennepin County shortly
after the accident to try to decide how to keep this type of thing
from happening again. There are 9 crosswalks at uncontrolled areas
along County Road 15 and County Road 110 in less than one square
mile. The last fatality was in 1984 at the 2020 Commerce
crosswalk.
The City Manager then reviewed the Police Chief's report dated
December 29, 1992. There were seventeen crosswalk related
accidents since January 1989. Twelve were rear-end accidents when
one driver was already stopped for a pedestrian in the crosswalk.
Five accidents involved pedestrians being struck; three of these
involved semaphore controlled crosswalks. Fourteen accidents took
place during daylight hours, with three at night. The Police Dept.
wrote 155 crosswalk violations during the period from 1989 through
1992. The Police Chief reported that he does not see lighting as
the issue. There are many distractions when traffic is heavy that
cause visibility problems. The crosswalks have been discussed many
times with the business people in the community. An issue for
consideration is that many people perceive crosswalks as an "alley
of safety". The have a false sense of security when using a
crosswalk. People need to be better educated about pedestrian
safety.
The City Manager reported that from a public safety perspective,
(for the safety of drivers and pedestrians) he and the Police Chief
recommend the removal of the following four mid-block crosswalks:
1. The one in front of the House of Moy Restaurant;
2. The one in front of the Post Office;
3. The one south on County Road 110 by the Pennywise Shop;
and
4. The one north on County Road 110 by the Library.
If that is not acceptable to the Council, you could consider
combining the crosswalks on County Road 15 by removing the one at
the House of Moy and the one at the Post Office and installing one
closer to the bus shelter area. Another suggestion would be to
move the crosswalk by the Post Office further to the east at
Belmont. These ideas were presented to the Retail and Professional
Council last week with about 30 people in attendance. The majority
of these people at this meeting agreed with the recommendation to
remove the mid-block crosswalks. Three Councilmembers were in
attendance.
The Council asked if there was anyone in attendance who wished to
speak.
Mrs. Moy, owner of House of Moy, stated she does not want to
see the crosswalk at the House of Moy removed. Her reasons
were as follows:
- more dangerous without crosswalk;
- more people could be killed;
- they have over 1000 customers per week using the
parking lot across the street and need this crosswalk;
- in 22 years there has only been 1 fatality;
- a lot of senior citizens and handicapped who need the
crosswalk.
Don Noack, Reed and Pond representing Mrs. Moy, urged the
Council to keep this crosswalk at the House of Moy. Because
of the parking lot there would probably be more accidents if
the crosswalk were removed. He stated he thinks the City is
I i I
obliged to help people using the parking lot across the street
to get across the street safely. He suggested making the
House of Moy crosswalk more visible, by additional markings
along county Road 110 advising of crosswalks ahead. Removing
this crosswalk is not practical or prudent.
Mike Durell, suggested staggering the traffic entering onto
County Road 15 which could be done by the stop lights; placing
signs 100' in front of the crosswalk. Thought the Council
should take another look at this crosswalk before removing it.
He felt the Police should do a better job of enforcing
pedestrian safety by ticketing drivers who are not observing
crosswalk laws. It would not be convenient for people to park
in the lot and walk to the stop light, cross and then go to
the House of Moy.
Lucy Steer, used to have a business on County Road 15, and
felt the speed was too fast on County Road 15.
The Council discussed the mid-block crosswalks and the problems
associated with them. The Council stated that inattentive drivers
and inattentive pedestrians are the problem and they are trying to
minimize chances of an accident. The Council agreed that the
crosswalks are poorly laid out, but they were put where they are to
placate the businesses sometime in the past. They also agreed that
the crosswalks were never placed for pedestrian safety. The
Council voiced concern about people feeling a false sense of
security in crosswalks. The Council stated that they will continue
to observe what is happening on County Road 15 and are aware that
one possibility would be to install a crosswalk closer to the bus
shelter where there is a natural break in vehicular traffic because
of the roads there. The Council suggested that people could use
the parking lot behind the House of Moy.
MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded Smith to accept the
recommendation of the Police Chief to remove the following 4
mid-block crosswalks:
1. The one on County Road 15 in front of the House of Moy
Restaurant;
2. The one on County Road 15 in front of the Post Office;
3. The one south on County Road 110 by the Pennywise Shop;
and
4. The one north on County Road 110 by the Library.
The City Manager advised that this would be done as soon as
possible.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.12 SET DATE FOR LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to set May 11,
1993, at 7:00 P.M. for the Local Board of Review. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.13 ~PPROVAL OF LICENSE RENEWALS
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jensen to authorize the
issuanoe of the following licenses contingent upon all
required forms, insurance, etc., being provided:
CIGARETTE LICENSES
A1 & Alma,s
Brickley,s
John,s Variety & Pets
Meyer,s Service
PDQ Food Store %0292
SuperAmerica %4194
VFW Post %5113
American Legion Post %398
Headliner,s Bar & Grill
Jubilee Foods
Mound Municipal Liquor
R & R Bait
Thrifty Drug
GARBAGE HAULER LICENSES
Blackowiak
Westonka Sanitation
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Randy's Sanitation
Woodlake Sanitation
Motion carried.
1.14 PAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Johnson to authorize the
payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of
$39,264.30, when funds are available. & roll call vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. January 1993 Department Head Reports.
B. January 1993 LMCD Representative's Report.
C. LMCD Mailings.
De
Preliminary 1992 Financial Report as prepared by Gino
Businaro, Finance Director.
E. Park Commission Minutes of January 14, 1993.
F. Planning Commission Minutes of January 25, 1993.
REMINDER: 1993 NLC Congressional-City Conference March 6-9,
Washington, D. C. Please let Fran know as soon as possible if
you plan to attend. The deadline for registration is February
12.
He
NEWS RELEASE from the Government Finance Officers Association
re: City of Mound has again received the Certificate of
Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for 1991.
We thank John Norman, former Finance Director for all of his
hard work to obtain this award again for the City.
11 I I
Letter dated February 4, 1993, from Jim' Larson, City
prosecuting Attorney, re: settlement of City of Mound v. Dean
Hanus. This was the criminal case and Mr. Hanus pleaded
guilty to the second count and was fined $700. The civil case
will be heard sometime this fall. The criminal case against
Ms. Munson will begin on March 2, 1993.
Je
LMC Legislative Conference, Thursday, March 18, 1993, St. Paul
Radisson Hotel. The deadline for advance registration is
March 11, 1993. Please let Fran know if you are planning to
attend.
CROSSWALKS
The Council discussed asking the County to put a no turn on red at
the south corner of Commerce onto Shoreline Drive.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Smith to request that
Hennepin County install a "No Turn on Red" sign at the traffic
signal on Commerce & Shoreline for traffic turning right onto
Shoreline Drive from Commerce Blvd. The vote was unanimously
in favor. Motion carried.
MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Jensen to adjourn at 11~45
P.M. Tho vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
Attest: City Clerk
CITY OF MOUND
CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION
FOR BRET NICCUM
WHEREAS, congratulations and cilatioos are in order for Bre~
Niccum for helping re.~ue Merlin Besler from Lake Minneto~ka on December
19, 1992, when his snowmobile broke through the ice; and
WHEREAS, a catastrophe was avoided because of the quick
response and knowledge of ice rescue techniques demonstrated by Bret Niccum;
WHEREAS, this skillful action in averting what could have been
a tragic loss ~o family, Mends, and community was an ac~ of heroism which
debt, yes special recognition by the governing body of this City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVi~ that Ihe sincere
appreciation of the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, and all
citizens at large of this community, are hereby extended to Bret Niccum for his
heroic action.
Adopted unanimously on the 9th day of February. 1993.
_ ,~,, '~_, ~ ~,, , --
Councifm~nber Liz Sensen
Cou~it'~eml~hyllis .lessen
CITY OF MOUND
CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION
FOR MURRAY SINNER
WHEREAS, congratulations and citations are in order for Murray
Sinner for helping rescue Merlin Besler from Lake Minnetonka on December 19,
1992, when his snowmobile broke through the ice; and
WHEREAS, a catastrophe was avoided because of the quick
response and knowledge of ice rescue technique.si demonstrated by Murray
Sinner; and
WHEREAS, this skillful action in averting what could have been
a tragic loss to family, friends, and community was an act of heroism which
deserves special recognition by the governing body of this City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the sincere
appreciation of the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, and all
citizens at large of this community, are hereby extended to Murray Sinner for his
heroic action.
Adol:~ed unanimously on the 9th day of Feburary,/~ff3. / ~'~
Mayor 'Sk~
Cou~nct~ember Liz 1ensen
Cou~ilmem~hyllis ~essen
Steve Smith
State Representative
District 43A
Hennepin County
Minnesota
House of
Representatives
COMMITTEES: GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS, PENSIONS SUBCOMMITTEE: JUDICIARY, FAMILY LAW SUBCOMMITTEE,
CIVIL LAW SUBCOMMITTEE; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND METRO AFFAIRS, TRANSIT SUBCOMMITTEE
January 20, 1993
Fr~ C. Clark-Leisinger
City of Mound Clerk
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Fran:
After speaking with Senator Gen Olson, we've determined that a conflict would prevent
both of us from attending the February 9 Mound City Council meeting.
~e want to get into the Council just as early in session as we can and February 23 is op~'
and we will hold it open. ~;
~ you please reschedu!e us for a bt:cf presentali~ffT6~he Counci~'---~ ~ Tuesd-------~yl February
23 (perhaps item one on the agenda, if possible). We will be brief, but we do care to let
you know what is going on here in our perspectives.
Also, the purpose of the presentation, of course, would be to hear from yourself, the mayor
and the councilmembers of Mound, as well.
~th
State Representative
cc: Senator Gen Olson
2710 Clare Lane, Mound, Minnesota 55364
State Office Building, St. Paul. Minnesota 55155
IR FAX (612) 296-3949
(612) 472-7664
(612) 296-9188
Mound, Minnesota
G.O: Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A
Full Crossover Advance Refunding of
G.O. Tax Increment Bonds of 1985
Even Annual Savings Structure.
Issuer Funds Required: $0.00
tDate of Bonds:
Delivery Date:
Refunded Call Date:
I st Callable Date:
03/01/93/
03/25/93/
lO/O1/~
10/01/20002
Comparison: I Refunded Refunding
Principal: 750,000 795,000
Bond Years: 7,187.50 7,573.75
Avg. Maturity: 9.583 9.527.
NIC: i 8.821% 4.542%
I'l:ot~l: Net:savings:
i.P~eSent valUe Savings!
/As %: of P.V, Ref' Int.:
Prepared: 02/23/93
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
Y".nd, Minnesota
~ ,. Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A
Annual savings Analysis
Schedule
Non-Refunded Refunding Total New
Date Debt Service Debt Service Debt Service
(1) (2) (3) (4)
04/01/93
10/01/93
04/01/94
10/01/94
04/01/95
10/01/95
04/01/96
10/01/96
04/01/97
10/01/97
04/01/98
10/01/98
04/01/99
10/01/99
o4/ol/2OOO
lO/Ol/2OOO
o~,ol/2OOl
." 01/2001
0~/01/2002
10/01/2002
04/01/2003
10/01/2003
04/01/2004
10/01/2004
204,625-00
223,925.00
216,125.00
208,125.00
224,975.00
214,600-00
228,975.00
(1,615.09)
205,230.00
188,260.00
181,380.00
169,180.00
157,050.00
204,625.00
223,925.00
216,125-00
208,125.00
224,975-00
214,600.00
227,359.91
205,230.00
188,260.00
181,380.00
169,180.00
157,050.00
Prepared: 02/23/93
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
Existing Savings
Debt Service or (Loss)
(5) (6)
204,625.00
223,925.00
216,125.00
208,125-00
224,975.00
214,600.00
228,975.00
216,075-00
203,025-00
189,900-00
176,700.00
163,350.00
1,615.09
10,845.00
14,765.00
8,520.00
7,520.00
6,300.00
' .als 1,521,350.00
Present Value Rate...:
Present Value Savings:
As % of P.V. Ref. Iht:
899,484.91
4.45643%
33,968.38
24.90%
2,420,834.91 2,470,400.00
Excess Proceeds ...... :
Funds to Sinking Fund:
Total Net Savings .... :
49,565.09
0.00
49,565.09
Mound, Minnesota
G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A
IFull Crossover Advance Refunding of
G.O. Tax Increment Bonds of 1985
Even Annual Savings Structure.
Issuer Funds Required: $0.00
Date of Bonds: 03/01/93
Delivery Date: 03/25/93
I Refunded Call Date: 10/01/99
[ 1st Callable Date: 10/01/2000
Comparison: Refunded Refunding
Principal: 750,000 795,000
Bond Years: 7,187.50 7,573.75
Avg'. Maturity: 9.583 9.527
NIC: 8.821% 4.542%
present value Savings:
As %: of P.V, Refl Int.:
Prepared: 02/23/93
By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
~ nd, Minnesota
G... Refunding Bonds, Series
Annual Savings Analysis
Non-Refunded
Date Debt Service
(1) (2)
o4/ol/93
lO/Ol/93
04/01/94
10/01/94
04/01/95
lO/Ol/95
04/01/96
lO/01/96
04/01/97
10/01/97
o4/ol/98
10/01/98
04/01/99
10/01/99
04/01/2000
lO/Ol/2OOO
O4u/01/2001
~ 91/2001
0~/01/2002
10/01/2002
04/01/2003
10/01/2003
04/01/2004
10/01/2004
204,625.00
223,925.00
216,125.00
208,125.00
224,975.00
214,600.00
228,975.00
1993A
Schedule E
Refunding Total New
Debt Service Debt Service
(3) (4)
(1,615.09)
205,230.00
188,260.00
181,380.00
169,180.00
157,050.00
204,625.00
223,925.00
216,125.00
208,125.00
224,975.00
214,600.00
227,359.91
205,230.00
188,260.00
181,380.00
169,180.00
157,050.00
Prepared:
By SPRINGSTED
Existing
Debt Service
(5)
204,625.00
223,925.00
216,125.00
208,125.00
224,975.00
214,600.00
228,975.00
216,075.00
203,025.00
189,900.00
176,700.00
163,350.00
02/23/93
Incorporated
Savings
or (Loss)
(6)
1,615.09
10,845.00
14,765.00
8,520.00
7,520.00
6,300.00
~o,..als 1,521,350.00
Present Value Rate...:
Present Value Savings:
As % of P.V. Ref. Iht:
899,484.91
4.45643%
33,968.38
24.90%
2,420,834.91 2,470,400.00
Excess Proceeds ...... :
Funds to Sinking Fund:
Total Net Savings .... :
49,565.09
0.00
49,565.09
AWARD:
SALE:
SPRINGSTED
PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS
Home Office
85 East Seventh Place
Suite 100
Saint Paul, MN 55101-2143
(612) 223-3000
Fax: (612) 223-3002
222 South Ninth Street
Suite 2825
Minneapolis, MN 55402-3368
(612) 333-9177
Fax: (612) 333-2363
16655 West Bluemound Road
Suite 290
Brookfield. WI 53005-5935
(414) 782-8222
Fax: (414) 782-2904
6800 College Boulevard
Suite 600
Overland Park. KS 66211-I 533
(913) 345-8062
Fax: (913) 345-1770
1800 K Street NW
Suite 831
Washington, DC 20006-2200
(202) 466-3344
$790,000* Fax: 1202) 223-1362
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993A
FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
February 23, 1993
Moody's Rating: A
Standard & Poor's Rating: A
l~idder
Interest Net Interest True Interest
.Rates Price Cost Rate
FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
COMMERCE BANK OF KANSAS CITY
PIPER JAFFRAY INC.
FIRSTAR BANK MILWAUKEE, N.A.
_MOORE, JURAN AND COMPANY,
INCORPORATED
4.10%
4.30%
4.50%
4.60%
4.70%
4.20%
4.35%
4.50%
4.60%
4.70%
4.20%
4.35%
4.50%
4.65%
4.80%
4.375%
4.40%
4.50%
4.60%
4.20%
4.35%
4.50%
4.65%
4.80%
20OO
2001
2002
2003
2O04
2000
2001
2002
2000
2004
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2000
2001
2002
2003-2004
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
$784,075.00 $,342,401.25 4.5565%
$785,102.00 $,343,312.17 4.5662%
$785,070.40 $345,901.48 4.5996%
$782,170.65 $347,382.37 4.6327%
$783,087.50 $347,884.37 4.6327%
(Continued)
Interest Net Interest True Interest
Bidder
Rates
Price Cost Rate
PARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION
DOUGHERTY, DAWKINS, STRAND &
BIGELOW, INCORPORATED
CRONIN & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM &
COMPANY INCORPORATED
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK SAINT PAUL
DAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED
NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL, INC.
4.20% 2000
4.40% 2001
4.50% 2002
4.625% 2003
4.75% 2004
4.20% 2000
4.40% 2001
4.50% 2002
4.65% 2003
4.80% 2004
4.20% 200O
4.40% 2001
4.55% 2002
4.70% 2003
4.85% 2004
4.20% 2000
4.40% 2001
4.55% 2002
4.70% 2003
4.85% 2004
4.25% 2000
4.45% 2001
4.60% 2002
4.70% 2003
4.80% 2004
4.20% 2000
4.40% 2001
4.60% 2002
4.75% 2003
4.90% 2004
4.30% 2000
4.50% 2001
4.65% 2002
4.75% 2003
4.85% 2004
$782,1 03.00 $348,279.69 4.6421
$783,048.00 $348,610.54 4.6427%
$783,522.00 $350,592.17 4.6669%
$782,890.00 $351,224.17 4.6775%
$783,292.90 $352,031.47 4.6879%
$783,996.00 $352,573.79 4.6910%
$783,680.00 $355,412.29 4.7316%
$783,113.30 $355,977.33 4.7436%
4.50% 2000-2001
4.60% 2002
4.75% 2003-2004
These Bonds are being reoffered at par.
BBI: 5.p=
Average Maturity: 9.54 Ye. P
* Subsequent to bid opening, the issue size was increased to $795,000. The 2000 maturity was increased by $5,000 to
$170,000..
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND,
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was duly held
at the City Hall in said City on Tuesday, the 23rd day of February, 1993, at
7:30 p.m. The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
The Mayor announced that the next order of business would be the
consideration of proposals for the purchase of $790,000 General Obligation
Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A.
The City Clerk and Springsted Incorporated, financial advisors to
the City, then presented the proposals which had been delivered to them
prior to the time specified for proposals. The proposals had been opened,
examined and found to be as follows:
After
due
consideration of said proposals, Councilmember
introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF $~9~ENERAL
OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS,
SERIES 1993A; FIXING THEIR FORM AND
SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECOTIONAND
DELIVERY; PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT; AND
PROVIDING FOR THE DEPOSIT OF THE PROCEEDS
THEREOF AND PROVIDING FOR THE REDEMPTION OF
BONDS REFUNDED THEREBY.
WHEREAS, this Council issued $1,800,000 General Obligation Tax
Increment Redevelopment Bonds of 1985, dated October 1, 1985, and
WHEREAS, the City has directed Springsted Incorporated, the City's
financial advisors, to investigate the feasibility of advance refunding
the 2000 through 2004 maturities of the City's $1,800,000 General
Obligation Tax Increment Redevelopment Bonds of 1985 dated October 1, 1985,
and
WHEREAS, Springsted Incorporated advises that there remains
outstanding the sum of $1,525,000 from said issue; and further advise that
it is in the best interests of the City to call the $750,000 of bonds which
mature in the years 2000 through 2004, and that the $775,000 principal
amount of the 1985 issue maturing from October 1, 1993, through October 1,
1999, will remain outstanding after the refunding, and
WHEREAS, the refunding of the $750,000 General Obligation Tax
Increment Redevelopment Bonds of 1985 which mature in the years 2000
through 2004 is hereby determined to be necessary and desirable for the
reduction of debt service costs to the City, and for the substantial savings
offered by the lower rates currently existing in the municipal bond market,
and
WHEREAS, it is determined that the City should issue and sell its
General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A in the
aggregate principal amount of $782,100 for the above stated purposes. It
is further determined that additional bonds in the amount of $7,900 should
be issued to represent the additional cost of marketing bonds, as
authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56, which amount does not
exceed 2% of the amount otherwise authorized, and all amounts received for
the sale of said bonds in excess of $782,100 should be credited to the
sinking fund for the payment of interest on these obligations,
NOW, T~EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, By the City Council of the City of
Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The proposal of
to purchase $790,000 General Obligatfon Tax Increment Refunding Bonds,
Series 1993A of the City described in the proposal for sale is hereby found
and determined to be the highest and best bid received and shall be and is
hereby accepted, such bid being to purchase such bonds at a price of
$- plus accrued interest to date of delivery, such bonds to
bear interest as follows:
Year
Amount
Rate
2000 $165,000 %
2001 160,000 - -
2002 160,000 -%
_ %
2003 155,000 _ %
2004 150,000 ____%
The sum of $ , being the amount bid in excess of
$782,100, shall be credited to the bond sinking fund hereinafter created.
The City Clerk is directed to retain the good faith check of the successful
bidder pending completion of the sale and delivery of the bonds. The City
Clerk is directed to return the checks of the unsuccessful bidders
forthwith.
2. The City of Mound shall forthwith issue and sell its General
Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A (the "Bonds") in the
principal amount of $790,000, dated March 1, 1993. The printed, fully
registered bonds shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each or higher
multiples thereof for any single maturity, bearing interest as above set
forth, all interest payable October 1, 1993, and semiannually thereafter on
April 1 and October 1 in each year, and which bonds mature on October 1 in the
years and amounts as follows:
YEAR
AMOUNT
2000 $165,000
2001 160,000
2002 160,000
2003 155,000
2004 150,000
The City may elect on October 1, 2002, or on any day thereafter, to prepay
Bonds due on or after October 1, 2003. Redemption may be in whole or in part
and if in part, at the option of the City and in such order as the City shall
determine and within a maturity by lot as selected by the registrar. All
prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
3. Both principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable at
and the City of Mound shall pay the reasonable charges of said bank for its
services as paying agent.
4. The Bonds shall be in substantially the following form:
(Face of the Bonds)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RENNEPIN COUNTY
CITY OF NOUND
GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BOND, SERIES 1993A
Rate Maturity Date of Original Issue CUSIP
March 1, 1993
$
KNOW ALL MEN BY T~ESE PRESENTS that the City of Mound, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, (the City), acknowledges
itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to
or registered assigns, the principal sum of
on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date
hereof at the annual rate specified above, payable on April 1 and October 1
in each year, commencing October 1, 1993, to the person in whose name this
Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15thday (whether or not a
business day) of the immediately preceding month. The interest hereon
and, upon presentation and surrender hereof at the principal office of the
Bond Registrar hereinafter designated, the principal hereof are payable ir
lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft of the
, in , Minnesota, as Bond Registrar,
Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Bond Registrar), or its successor
designated under the Resolution described herein.
Additional provisions of this Bond are contained on the reverse
hereof and such provisions shall for all purposes have the same effect as
though fully set forth hereon.
This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or
be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the
Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond
Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives.
IN WITNESS W~EREOF, the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the facsimile
signatures of the Mayor and the City Clerk, and has caused this Bond to be
dated as of the date set forth below.
Dated:
(Facsimile Signature)
City Clerk
(Facsimile Signature)
Mayor
CgRTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution
mentioned within.
as Bond Registrar and Paying Agent
By.
Authorized Representative
(Reverse of the Bonds)
This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of
$?90,000 (the Bonds), all of like date and tenor except as to serial number,
denomination, interest rate, and maturity date,
Resolution), to finance the refunding of certainissued pursuant to a
resolution adopted by the City Council on February 23, 1993, (the
obligations of the City pursuant to Minnesota Statute outstanding general
· s, Chapter 4?5, and is
issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the
Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling. This
pond is payable primarily from tax increments to be derived from increases
in assessed valuation of property within the tax increment financing
district, but the City is required by law to pay maturing principal hereof
and interest hereon from any available funds of the City if moneys on hand in
the Bond Fund are insufficient therefor. The Bonds are issuable only as
fully registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof,
of single maturities. The City may elect on October 1, 2002, and on any day
thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or after October 1, 2003 Redemption
may be in whole or in part and if in part, at the option of t~e City and in
such order as the City shall determine and within a maturity by lot as
selected by the registrar. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus
accrued interest.
As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations
set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at
the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof
in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrende
hereof together with a written instrument of tr=~ ......... r
~,,~c~ ~clsractory to the
Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and
may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized
denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will cause a new
Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner,
of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate
and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or
governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or
exchange.
The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in
whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether
this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all
other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be
affected by any notice to the contrary.
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that ali
cts conditions, and things required by the Constitution and laws of the
a , ' . ....... :-~ ~ ha~nen and to be performed
State of Minnesota to De Gone, ~o ~, ~v =~
precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and
binding general obligation of the City according to its terms have been
done, do exist, have happened and have been performed in regular and due
form as so required; that the City has pledged special assessments and if
necessary ad valorem taxes, collectible in the years and amounts required
to produce sums not less than five percent in excess of the principal of and
interest on the Bonds as such principal and interest respectively become
due, and has appropriated the same to the Bond Fund in the manner specified
· Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61; that, in the event of any
~umulat~d or anticipated deficiency in.t~e Bond.~nd,_~dditi?~_~..~
~orem ~es are required by law to be levied upon all taxable proper=y x-
the City without limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of
this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any
constitutional or statutory limitation.
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the
face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to the applicable laws or regulations:
TEN COM - as tenants UNIF TRANSFERS MIN ACT...Custodian ....
in common (Cust) (Minor)
TEN ENT -
JT TEN -
list.
as tenants
by the entireties
as joint tenants
with right of
survivorship and
not as tenants
in common
under Uniform Transfers to
Minors
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above
ASSIGNMENT
For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns, and
transfers unto
the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and does hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint
attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration
thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated:
Signature Guaranteed:
NOTICE: The assignor,s sign--~ture to
this assignment must correspond with
the name as it appears upon the face of
the within Bond in every particular,
without alteration or any change
whatever.
Signature(s) must be guaranteed by a national bank or trust company or bya
brokerage firm having a membership in one of the major stock exchanges.
The Bond Registrar will not effect transfer of this Bond unless the
information concerning the assignee requested below is provided:
Name and Address
(Include information for all joint owners
if the Bond is held by joint account.)
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR
OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
5. The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form.
The interest and principal amount thereof shall be payable by check or draft
issued by the Registrar described herein.
6. Dates; Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated as of
the last interest payment date
preceding the date of authentication to
which interest on the Bond has been paid or made available for payment,
unless (i) the date of authentication is an interest payment date to which
interest has been paid or made available for Payment, in which case such
Bond shall be dated as of the date of authentication, or (ii) the date of
authentication is prior to October 1, 1993, in which case such Bond shall be
dated as of March 1, 1993. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on
April 1 and October 1 in each year, commencing October 1, 1993, to the owner
of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the
immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day.
7. Registration. The City shall appoint and shall maintain a
bond registrar, transfer agent, and paying agent (the Registrar). The
effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the
Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows:
(a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its
principal corporate trust office a bond register in which
the Registrar shall provide for the registration of
ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and
exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred
or exchanged.
(b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for
transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner
thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer,
in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the
registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall
authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated
transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like
aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by
the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the
books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth
day of the month preceding each interest payment date and
until such interest payment date.
(c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is
surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the
Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new
Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as
requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney
duly authorized in writing.
(d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon
any transfer or exchange shall be promptly cancelled by the
Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the
City.
(e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any
Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the
Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is
satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate
instrument of transfer is legally authorized. The
Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal, in good
faith, to make transfers which, in its judgment, it deems
improper or unauthorized.
(f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the
Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at
any time registered in the bond register as the absolute
owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or
not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account
of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all
other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such
registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid
and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the
City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid.
(g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer
or exchange of Bonds, the Registrar may impose a charge upon
the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for
any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be
paid with respect to such transfer or exchange.
(h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds.
In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen
or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like
amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and
substitution for and upon cancellation of any such
mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any
such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the
reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in
connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost,
stolen or destroyed, upon illin with
evidencesatisfactorv .~ ~ .... ~ _ ~ th~ Registrar
~ to 1~ ~.a~ ~ucn ~ona was lost, stolen
or destroyed, and of the ownershi th
furnishing to the R ~--- P ereof, and upon
indemnity in form. an appropriate bond-o
· . ~ .... o~nce and amo · r
in which bond the Citu and t~ ..... u~t sa~lsfactorytoit,
~ ~= ~g~strar shall be named as
obligees, all pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 475.69 and 475.70. All Bonds so
surrendered to the Registrar shall be cancelled by it and
evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City.
If the mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Bond has
already matured or been called for redemption in accordance
with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond
prior to payment.
8. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints
as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and the City Clerk are authorized to
execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with
as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another
corporation, if the resulting cor orati ·
authorized by law to conduct ~..-~ ~ ..... on ~s a.bank or trust comp y
~. uu~ness, SUCh corporation shalla~e
authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the
reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services
performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty
(30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in
which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in
its possession to the successor Registrar and shall deliver the bond
register to the successor Registrar. On or before each principal or
interest due date, without further order of this City, the City Clerk shall
transmit to the Registrar, from the General Obligation Tax Increment
Refunding Bond Fund, monies sufficient for the payment of all principal and
interest then due.
9. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under
the direction of the City Clerk and shall be executed on behalf of the City
by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Clerk, provided that the Mayor
and City Clerk's signatures may be facsimiles thereof. In case any officer
whose signature, or a facsimile of whose signature, shall appear on the
Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such
signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for ali
purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery
Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory fob
any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution
unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly
executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the
Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different bonds need not be
signed by the same representative of the Registrar. The executed
certificate of authentication on each bond shall be conclusive evidence
that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When
the Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered
by the City Clerk to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price, and
the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the
purchase price.
10. The Council hereby finds and determines that the estimated
collection of tax increments for the payment of the Bonds hereby issued are
adequate to provide at least 105% of the principal and interest on such
Bonds as they become due.
11. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file in the office of the
County Auditor of Hennepin County a certified copy of this resolution,
together with such other information as the County Auditor may require and
to obtain from the Auditor a certificate that such resolution has been filed
and the Bonds have been entered upon the bond register as required by
Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.63.
12. The General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series
1993A (hereinafter referred to as "the refunding bonds") are issued to
refund in advance of maturity the 2000 through 2004 maturities of the City's
$1,800,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Revevelopment Bonds of 1985,
dated October 1, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as "the refunded bonds"),
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67. It is hereby found and
determined that such refunding shall result in a reduction of interest cost
to the City on the refunded bonds and that their issuance is authorized as
refunding bonds as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67,
Subdivision 3.
The City Clerk shall deposit the proceeds of the Bonds, other than
the amounts set aside to pay expenses, in an escrow account with a bank whose
deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and whose
combined capital and surplus is in excess of $500,000, and shall invest such
funds in securities authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.66,
maturing on such dates as shall be required to provide funds sufficient to
redeem the entire outstanding principal amount of the General Obligation
Tax Increment Redevelopment Bonds of 1985 on October 1, 1999. Prior to and
including said dates, investment earnings on said escrow account shall be
used solely to pay interest on the Bonds and shall be remitted to the
Registrar for said purpose. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized
to enter into an escrow agreement with said Bank establishing the terms and
conditions for the escrow account. The City Clerk is authorized and
directed forthwith to give notice to the Registrar of the redemption and
prepayment of the 2000 through 2004 maturities of the General Obligation
Tax Increment Redevelopment Bonds of 1985 and the Registrar shall mail a
notice thereof by registered or certified mail at least thirty (30) days
prior to the date fixed for redemption to the registered owners of each Bond
to be redeemed at the address shown.on the registration books.
13. As of the date of delivery of and payment for the refunding
bonds, the proceeds of the sale of the refunding bonds, together with other
funds hereinafter appropriated for such purpose as shall be necessary to
pay the principal of and the interest (and any premium) on the refunded
bonds to their maturity are hereby pledged and appropriated and shall be
used to pay the principal and interest coming due on the bonds maturing or
being called for payment on or after October 1, 1999. The Bonds are to be
called for redemption on October 1, 1999.
14. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the
proceeds of the sale of the refunding bonds, together with other funds
available and appropriated, will be sufficient to pay when due all of the
principal and interest on the refunded bonds.
15. On or prior to the delivery of the refunding bonds, the Mayor,
City Clerk, and City Treasurer are hereby authorized and directed to
deposit funds on behalf of the City with the
in sufficient amounts to pay all interest and principal on the bonds
maturing or being called for payment on October 1, 1999.
16. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to
prepare and furnish to the purchaser of the refunding bonds, and to the
attorneys approving the legality of the issuance thereof, certified copies
of all proceedings and records of the City relating to said bonds and to the
financial condition and affairs of the City, and such other affidavits,
certificates and information as are required to show the facts relating to
the legality and marketability of said bonds as the same appear from the
books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to
them, and all such certified copies,
including any heretofore furnished, shall certificates and affidavits,
be deemed representations of the
City as to the facts stated therein. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to certify that they have examined the official
statement or prospectus prepared and circulated in connection with the
issuance and sale of the bonds and that to the best of their knowledge and
belief said statement is a complete and accurate representation of the
facts and representations made therein as of the date of said official
statement or prospectus.
17. When all refunding bonds issued under this resolution have
been discharged as provided in this paragraph, all pledges, covenants and
other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the refunding
bonds shall cease, except that the pledge of the full faith and credit of the
City for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the
refunding bonds (and premiums, if any) shall remain in full force and
effect. The City may discharge all refunding bonds which are due on any
date by depositing with the Registrar for such bonds on or before that date a
sum sufficient for the Payment'thereof in full; or if any bonds should not be
paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the
Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest
accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also at any tim~
discharge this issue of bonds in its entirety by complying with th~
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.67, Subdivisions 4 to 12,
except that the funds deposited in escrow ~t accordance with said
provisions may (to the extent permitted by law), need not be, in whole or
in part, proceeds of advance refunding bonds. The City may discharge
refunding bonds as herein provided without the consent of any bondholders.
18. The General Obligation Tax Increment Development Bonds of
1985 refunded hereby which mature on October 1, 2000, and thereafter shall
be redeemed and prepaid in accordance with their terms.
The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to
time of ~Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its
officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on
the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the Code), and the Treasury Regulations promulgated
thereunder (the Regulations), and covenants to take any and all actions
within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become
subject to taxation under the Code and the Regulations. The Bonds will be
designated by the City as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" for purposes
of the Tax Reform Act of 1986. It is also determined that the bonds are not
arbitrage bonds and are not private activity bonds.
20. The City has agreed to furnish to the purchaser the approving
legal opinion of Messrs. Wurst, Pearson, Larson, Underwood, and Mertz, of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, and such opinion is hereby requested. The City
Clerk shall obtain a copy of said approving legal opinion, which shall be
complete except as to dating thereof, and shall cause said opinion to be
printed on each Bond, together with a certificate to be signed by the
facsimile signature of the City Clerk in substantially the following form:
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a
full, true and correct copy of the legal opinion
executed by the above named attorneys, except as
to the dating thereof, which opinion has been
handed to me for filing in my office prior to the
time of bond delivery.
Francene C. Clark
City Clerk
City of Mound
At the time of delivery, the City Clerk shall prepare a similar separate
certificate, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
execute such certificate in the name of the City upon receipt of such
opinion and to file the opinion in the City offices.
21. The Bonds shall be payable from the General Obligation Tax
ndin Bonds, Series 1993A Fund hereby created. If any
Increment ~ ~or int est on the Bonds shall become due when there is
~na such
payment of ~ ...... = .... er
not sufficient money in said fund to pay the same, the City shall pay
principal or interest from the general fund of the City.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Councilmember _, and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Approved this 23rd day of February, 1993.
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY OF MOUND
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully
compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting
of the City Council held on February 23, 1993, with the original thereof on
file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript
therefrom insofar as the same relates to the issuance and sale of $790,000
General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A of the City.
WITNESS My hand as Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this
day of . , 1993.
(SEAL)
City Clerk
City of Mound, Minnesota
I
CITY OF MOUND
PREMIUM SUMMARY
PROPERTY
BUSINESS INTERRUPTION'
CRIME
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE DISHONESTY'
CITY CLERK & TREASURER BONDS
THEFT, DISAPPEARANCE & DESTRUCTION
FORGERY OR ALTERATION
G~L LIABILITY
ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
AUTOMOBILE
LIABILITY
PHYSICAL DAMAGE
INLAND MARINE
LIQUOR LIABILITY
FIREMAN'S AD&D
WOKKERS' COMPENSATION
$ 8,247
$ 258
$ 1,100
$ 200
$ 365
$ 138
$ 45,975
$ 5,896
$ 13,500
$ 555
$ 10,699
$ 3,056
$ 7,731
$ 3OO
$ 53,234
$ 10,095
INCLUDED
$. 1,I00
$ 20O
$ 272
$ 138
$ 48,011
$ 5,628
$ 13,551
INCLUDED
$ 10,005
$ 3,081
$ 6,575
$ 250
$ 57,845
TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUAL PREMIUM
$151,254
$156,751
PROPOSED RESOLUTION #93-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE
TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION
AT 1927 LAKESIDE LANE
LOT 10, BLOCK 11v SHADY~OOD POINT, PID #18-117-23 23 0056
P&Z CASE #93-003
~EREAS, the applicants, John and Janet Page, have applied
for a variance to recognize existing nonconforming setbacks to
allow construction of a second story addition, an entry addition
and an additional garage stall resulting in the following variance
requests:
Proposed Front Setback 7.6'
Existing Front Setback 9'
Existing North side 4'
Existing South Side 4.9'
Existing Lot Area 8,450
Existing Street Frontage 50.5'
Variance
30' 22.4'
30' 21'
6' 2'
10' 5.1'
10,000 1,550
60' 9.5'
and;
~ERE~, staff has concluded that the second story addition
and entry enhances the use and improves the livability of the
property, the proposed total hardcover on the lot will be less than
the 30 percent as proposed in the zoning code modifications, and
the existing structure footprint precludes any other reasonable
location for expansion of the garage, and;
~EREAS, there is a large tree on the northwest side of the
house, behind the existing garage, which hinders expansion into
that area, and;
~HEREAS, The subject property is located within the R-1 Single
Family Residential Zoning District which according to City Code
requires a lot area of 10,000 square feet, a 30 foot front yard
setback, a 10 foot and a 6 foot side yard setback for lots of
record, and a 50 foot lakeshore setback, and;
WHERE]%S, The Planning Commission has reviewed the request and
recommended approval with the following Finding of Fact: In order
to eliminate cars from hanging over into the right-of-way while
parked in the driveway, it is recommended that the garage doors
face the side property line, and due to the existing floor plan and
the need for an entry/breezeway, it is recommended that the garage
be allowed to extend 2 feet further towards the front property
line.
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 22, 1993
CASE
JOHN & JANET PAGEt 1927 LAKESIDE LANEt LOT 10,
BLOCK 11t 8HADYWOOD POINTt PID ~18-117-23 23 0056.
VARIANCE.
Building Official, Jon Sutherland, explained to the Commission that
this case will be heard by the City Council tomorrow night, the
applicant has slightly modified his plan and it is required the
Commission review this change. The Building Official placed the
revised survey on the overhead and distributed copies to the
Commissioners for discussion. He explained that the revised plan
shows an addition at the lakeside of the house which measures 2.5'
x 4.75' and involves only the second story. The Commission did not
have any concerns relating to the small lakeside addition, however,
Mueller noted that the survey reflects a garage 27.5' deep and
noted that the Planning Commission recommended only a 24' deep
garage. Also, the proposed entry addition appears to be larger
than originally proposed.
MOTION made by #eiland, seconded by Mueller, to
recommended approval of the supplementary second floor
addition measuring 2.5' x 4.75', as requested by the
applicant. The Planning Commission re-states their
original recommendation to allow construction of the
second story addition, entry/breezeway addition (as
originally proposed at 5.5' x 12.5'), and expansion of
the existing garage. The garage shall be limited to 24
feet wide and 22 feet deep. It is also recommended that
a new survey be submitted prior to building permit
issuance. Motion carried unanimously.
This case will be reviewed by the City Council on February 23,
1993.
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
.
~u/~s~ Fsi. ~. I~ FEB - ~
= = WOOD STAKE PLACED O = IRON MON SET .
e~NGS.ON PROPOSED ~NFORMA~ON
ASSUMED DATUM 1st FLOOR ~LEV. GARAGE FLOOR ELEV.
BASEMEN" ELEV. TOP BLOCK ELEV.
~-= DRAINAGE 000.0 = EX~ST. ELEV. (000.0~ P~POSED ELEV. E & P_
~0.0 - EX~ST. & PROP. ELEV.
I hereby certify that this plan, survey Or repo~ was JOB ~
~ SOHOBORG ' prepared bymeor mdermydirect supervision and that lam
- a duly Registered;an~ Su~eyor under the laws of the State
~N D SURVEYING o~ ui.~esota. ~- .a~e
Scale
,~ ~. so, ~o~ Date: _ ~ ; ~ Registration No. 14700
9~2-~221 ~laao. MN 55~2~
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
PAOE 2
CASE #93-003
e
NOW, THEREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City does hereby approve a variance for the property at
1927 Lakeside Lane, as follows:
Proposed Front Setback *6.5,+/- 30' 23.5,
Existing Front Setback 9' 30' 21'
Existing North Side 4' 6' 2'
Existing South Side 4.9' 10' 5.1'
Existing Lot Area 8,450 10,000 1,550
Existing Street Frontage 50.5, 60' 9.5'
Variance
*(setback needs to be verified by a surveyor)
This variance is approved to allow construction of a second
story addition, and entry/breezeway addition, and expansion of
the existing garage, upon the following conditions:
A. The garage doors shall face the south side lot line and
the garage shall be limited to 24 feet wide and 22 feet
deep.
B. Proper drainage shall be provided from the front and
sides of the property to avoid any problem with the
abutting properties.
The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below,
pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) of the Zoning Code
with the clear and express understanding that the use remains
as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the
provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404.
It is determined that the livability of the residential
property will be improved by the authorization of the
following alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to
afford the owners reasonable use of their land:
Construction of a 24 ' x 30 ' 8" second floor
addition, an entry/breezeway addition approximately
5'6,, x 12', and expansion to the garage resulting
in a total dimension of 24' x 22'.
This variance is granted for the following legally described
property:
Lot 10, Block 11, Shadywood Point.
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
P&GE 2
CASE $93-003
e
This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or
the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to
Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1).
This shall be considered a restriction on how this property
may be used.
The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing
this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for
such recording. A building permit for the subject
construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has
been filed with the City Clerk.
· rLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 8, 1993
C&SB #93-003: ~OHN & J-- ....... ' ' * '
-1 BHADYRO0~ p~. ~L*'_A?.B. ~727 LAK"BZDB LANB 10 BLOCK
Building Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicant,s request
for a variance to construct a second story addition, entry, and an
additional garage stall. The
variances: request includes the following
Proposed Front Setback 7.6'
Existing Front Setback 9'
Existing North Side 4'
Existing South Side 4.9'
Existing Lot Area 8,450
Variance
30' 22.4,
30, 21'
6' 2'
10' 5.1,
10,000 1,550
Existing Street Frontage 50.5, 60' 9.5'
The second story addition and entry enhances the use and improves
the livability of the property with only a slight reduction of the
front yard in that area. The proposed total hardcover on the lot
will be less than the 30 percent as proposed in the zoning code
modifications. The existing structure footprint precludes any
other reasonable location for expansion of the garage. Lack of off
street parking is a concern.
Staff commented that it is difficult to find hardship in this case,
however, it was recommended that if the Planning Commission finds
that a practical difficulty exists and that it is reasonable to
allow the variances requested, staff would recommend that proper
drainage be provided from the front and sides of the property to
Planning Co~ission Minutes
Febru&~J 8, 1993
avoid any problem with the abutting properties.
The applicant, John Page, spoke on his behalf and stated that there
is always a car parked where the additional garage stall is
proposed anyway.
The Commission's comments indicated that they were in favor of
additional garage space, however, there was concern that the 27.5
foot width as requested was not a minimum, and if the width was
reduced to 22 or 24 feet it would reduce the variance towards the
street due to the angle of the lot line and the structure. The
Commission was not concerned with the proposed second story
addition.
Major concern was expressed regarding the short driveway with the
garage doors facing the street. It was suggested that the garage
doors be turned to face the side property line.
MOTION made by Hanus, seconded by Clapsaddle to recommend
approval of the variances as requested with the exception
that the garage not exceed 24' wide and 22' deep.
The Commission discussed that allowing a 24' wide garage exceeds
the minimum, and that a 22' x 22' garage should be required.
Clapsaddle questioned the difference of 2 feet and commented that
the visual impact of allowing two more feet is very minimal.
Mueller spoke in favor of requiring the garage doors to face the
side property line.
Hanus moved to amend his motion to limit the size of the
garage to 22' x 22'. Clapsaddle withdrew his second.
Michael seconded the amended motion.
The Planning Commission discovered through further discussion that
if the garage doo~s were required to face the side lot line, and
only a 22' garage is allowed it would eliminate any possibility for
an entry addition. The applicant emphasized the importance of the
entry/breezeway to the Commission. Clapsaddle noted that if the
garage was allowed to extend 2 more feet towards the front lot line
this would allow for the breezeway addition. The Commission
discussed the appearance of this option and commented that if there
was a strip of green space with some shrubs between the garage and
the front lot line it would be more aesthetically pleasing than
having it all paved.
Hanus withdrew his previous motion. Michael seconded the
withdrawal.
5
Planning Co~mission Nlnutes
February 8, 1993
MOTION made by Hanus, seconded b
approval of the varla .... Y Michael to recomnend
i~rY/~reezeeay addition_'an~ .~[~a s~pry addition,
~ara e. Th - - --m=nsaon of the
g · garage doors shal existing
line and the gars,e .~ ...... 1 .fa~e the south side t
' l lted to li feet wide
~2 feet deep, Finding of fact: This suggested plan for
the garage will eliminate cars fr
right-of-way when ,--~-, · .... o~ hanging over into th
r--~,~ zu cne driveway and will benefi~
the c~rent floor plan to
Motion carried - ~- , _. ac~o~odate a breezeway.
'ichael. Cl,...A,:° :' ','nose in favor, ,eilandly:~~
PP .
Johnson commented that increasing a variance to the front lot line
is giving the wrong message.
This case will be heard by the City Council on February 23, 1993.
CITY of MOUND
STAFF REPORT
5341 M,~YWOOD BO, AD
MOUND M?~NE$OTA 5536a :68T
FAX 6~2~ 472 0620
DATE:
TO:
FROM;
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
CASE NO.
LOCATION:
ZONING'
Planning commission Agenda of February 8, 1993
Planning commission, Applicant and staff
Jon sutherland, Building official ~
Variance Request
John & Janet Page
93-003
1927 Lakeside Lane
Lot 10, Block 11, Shadywood Point
PID #18-117-23 23 0056
R-1 single Family Residential
BACKGROUND
· ' ekin setback and lot width variances in order
The applicant is s~_~ -~or" addition, a 5.5' x 12' entr~ ~}~
to construct a seconu ~u..~ -- -ro-ert". A lot area ~erlcx~,t~
an additional garage stall on ~ne p p ~
is noted, only 8,450 +/- square feet is existing and 10,000 square
feet is required, and there ~s an inadequate street frontage of
9.5'.
The second story addition and entry enhances the use and improves
the livability of the property with only a slight reduction of the
front yard in that area.
The additional garage area further encroaches into the front yard
with a proposed setback of 7.5 feet to the required 30 foot front
· ' .5 foot variance request. The e~isting
yard resulting 1~ ~ ~__~,,~ anu other reasonable loca~o~f~
structure foot prln~ p_r.~ux~_~_~__,~ in hardcover is only sllgn~ ~
expansion of garage. T~e ~nu£~
the proposed garage is to be constructed in the area of an existing
bituminous parking surface. Total hardcover on the lot is less
than the 30 percent proposed in the zoning code modifications-
In discussion with the city Planner, he was concerned that there
will be less or no available off street parking.
&5 ~ ~ printed on recycled p~per
Staff Report
1927 Lakeside Lane
Page 2
--RECOMMENDATION
It is difficult to find hardshi · . .
~a~ning Commission finds t~-~ p la ~hls case, however, if +~-
~nat it ' ~ a practical d .... ~=
_ is reasonable to ~ .... ~- lff~culty exist an~
recommend that pro-er dr=~-tt~ ~ne variance request staf~ ~J?~
of the property to%void ~%T%%o%%~r~°~.~3 33°~ 3~ ~ront an~ ~
...... -~un une aDu=~lng properties.
This case will be heard by the Planning Commission
1993 and by the City Council on February 23, 1993.
neighbors have been notified.
on February 8,
The abutting
JS:pj
revised 4/2/92
VARIANCE APPLICATION_
cx Y oF ouh'D
534~ Ma~ood Road, Moun~, ~ 55364~
Phone: 472-0600, Fax: 472-0620
Planning Commission Date:_,
City Council Date: F~
Site visit Scheduled:
Zoning Sheet Completed:
Copy to city Planner:
Application Fee: $50.00
Case No. fl5-005 _
Copy to Public Works: I~
Copy to city Engineer:. ...........................................
eeeeee®eeeeeee'eee~ee eoeeeeeeee-
Please type or print the following information:
Address of SubjeCt Property __ kD
Owner's Name ~'~
Owner' s Address_
Applicant's Name (if other than owner)
Address
Day Phone
Day Phone
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Addition 5~0t) ~oeO ~0! ~)7 PID No.~-I~-Z~ Z~ ~~
zoning District ~.-- ! _ Use of Property:
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use
permit, or othsr zoning prDcadure for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. if
yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and
pr.~vide copies of resolutions.
1. Detailed descripton of proposed construction or alteration (size, number
of stories, type of use, etc.):
f I II . .- ~- % ,
4/2/92
Variance Application
Page 2
Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and
setback regulations for
Yes ( ) No ~. the zoning district in which it is located?
' If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe
reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.)
SETBACKS:
Front Yard; ( N S E W )
Rear Yard: ( N S E W )
Lake Front:
Side Yard: ( S E W )
Side Yard: ( E W )
Lot Size:
Street Frontage
required
requested
(or existing)
ft. ~ ft
ft. '
ft. ft.
VARIANCE
ft.
ft.
ft. .', - ft.
ft. ft. - sq ft
Does the present use of the property conform t ~-~-~/_______ ft.
zoning district in which it is located? Ye~ all regulations for the
specify eachnon_conforminguse: ~, No ( ). If ao,
Which unique physical characteristics of the subject
its reasonable use for any of the uses
district?
too narrow
too small
too shallow
Please describe:
property prevent
permitted in that zoning
topography ( ) soil
drainage ~) existing
shape ( ) other: specify
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having
property interests i~the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted
(1982)? Yes (), No · If yes, explain
revised 4/2/92
Variance Application
Page 3
Case No.
Was the hardship created by any ~er man-made change, such as the
relocation of a road? Yes (), No If yes, explain
. . . 'tions of hardship for which you request a variance p~cgliar
7 Ar? t~e ~ndl ..... ~ .... ~ed in this petition? Yes (), No ~. If
on£v to the properuy u~- -. - ~-~,, affected?
no,~list some other properties wn~cn are ~,~,~o~z
8. Comments:
-1'o L
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in
any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate.
I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application
by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of
inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be
required by law. f
,
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR:~
= WOOD STAKE PLACED
B.M.-
BEARINGS ON
ASSUMED DATUM
o = IRON MON. SET
DRAINAGE 000.0 = EXIST. ELEV.
~[ SCHOBORG
~/~ND SURVEYING
INC. -
RI. 1.8o~ 208
972-3221 Delano. MN 5.5328
FEB - ~1 t993
-- GARAGE FLOOR ELEV.
_ TOP BLOCK ELEV.
E&P~
000.0 - EXIST, & PROP. ELEV.
I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am
a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
Date: ~ Registration No. 14700
JOB #
Book - Page
Scale
/ "- $0
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
Prepared
for:
CHAPMAN RESIDENCE
~ ~39.7
LEGAl, DESCRIPTION:
Lot 10, Block llt SliADYWOOD
POINT, accordin8 to the re-
corded plal: thereof, }lennepin
County, Htnneaota,
I-~,
. GENERAL
Denote/ron monument
I~eno~s cross chJs@l~d In concrete
Proposed/top of foundotion elevot;on =
Proposed bqeem~t finer ile,,~ttnn"
't'
,?
'i
'- I
i
:.
~J/llII
t
I
i
. ¢:.t," I
102
April 26, 1988
RESOLUTION NO. 88-67
RESOLUTION TO EXPAND THE FLOOR AREA OF ~ NONCONFORHING
LOT ;dND STRUCTURE FOR LOT 10, BLOCK 11, SHADYWOOD POINT,
PID ~18-117-23 23 0056 (lg27) LAKESIDE L~
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to construct a
second floor on top of an existing single family residence with
existing side yards of 4.6 feet and 4.9 feet; street front of 9
feet; lot area of 8,450 sq. ft.; and lot width of 51 ft.; and
WHERE~S, the zoning code for the R-1 single family dis-
trict .requires a 30 foot street front setback; a side yard set-
back of 6 feet and 10 feet for lots of record; a lot area of
10,000 sq. ft.; and a lot wiHth of 60 feet; and
WHEREAS, Section 23.404, Subd. (8) provides that al-
terations may be made to a building containing a lawful noncon-
forming residential unit when 'the alteration will improve the
livability thereof but the alteration may not increase the number
of units.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the City does hereby authorize the existing non-
conforming'principle structure setback at 1927 Lakeside
Lane, PID 918-117-2323 0056.
2. THe City Council authorizes the existing structural
setback violation and authorizes the alterations set
forth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subd. (8) with
the clear and express understanding that the use
remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to tall
of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404.
3. It is determined that the livability of the residential
unit will be improved by authorizing the following al-
terations to the nonconforming use property:
A second floor may be added to the existing principle
structure over the existing living area only as shown
on Exhibit A with the conditions:
a. the southeast side yard to 4.9 feet at the closest
projection except the eave,
b. the northwest side yard be no less than 10 feet,
c. the southwest lakeshore be no less than 50 feet,
d. the street front may not be less than the present
9 foot at the garage to the 28.5 foot setback of
103
Apri~ 26, 1988
the habitable space of the existing structure,
adequate drainage from the progosed hip roof shall
be diver~ed to divert the water to the lakeshore
area of the property with adequate gutters and
downspouts.
· The foregoing resolution was moved
Jessen and seconded by Councilmember Jensen.
The following Councilmembers voted in
Abel, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
by Councilmember
the affirmative:.
Attest. City Clerk
69-228
1].-5-69
RESOLUTION NO. 69-228
RESOLUTION GRANTIttG GARAGE VARIANCE
(Lot 10, Block 11, Shadywood Point)
W~S, the owner of Lot 10, Block 11, Shadywood Point has requested
setback variances in order to build a garage, and
WHEREAS, a hardship exists, and
WI~EREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that the variance be
granted,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND,
MINNESOTA:
That the requested variances be granted.
Adopted by the Council this 5th day of November, 1969
I"RONTt II I ·
LAZ~sftOKE 8
SIDE: N · g W
gILL TNI PROI~SKD ZNPROVEH~HT$
.I
o ')2
b,.'
o
o
0
o
~ 0
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND Mih, tiESOTA 55364-! 687
16' 2~ 472-0600
FAX 5'~2) 472-0620
1992 ANNUAL REPORT ON LIQUOR STORE OPERATIONS
PREPARED BY JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER
It always seems strange to me when writing my annual reports.
Here it is almost two months gone in 1993 already, and to talk
about 1992, I have to go back to 1991 to get comparisons. That is
such a long time span. Many things have happened in between for an
old guy like me to remember. I'll try and shake the cobwebs from
my memory to come up with an accurate report as possible.
BEER SALES
r were $583,832- That'S o~ly ~
Beer sales fo~ the _ye~_ -an count our blesslng~. __f~%.~
increase of ~.~. _~V~flw~i~; reported a decrease in ~az~=~:~
tional level t~e maju£ ~ -? _ -.~ ~ =~ h~ar' ~ aDOU~ u~=
their distributors os ~ -
same numbers. The biggest reason for the slump can be attributed
to one of the coldest and wettest summers on history in the
midwest. There was also a beer price war here in the metro area
among the competitive distributors- Prices to us were rolled back
to what they cost in 1990. The idea was to stimulate sales, but,
because of the weather, people did not have the incentive to
purchase more. Out beer sales represented 48.5% of our total
sales. Usually, this percentage is around 50%.
LIQUOR SALES
Not much changed in the spirit category. Sales were $405,952.
ss retty much was to be expected.
That was 5.5% up over 1991. Th' P ss tells
The cost of these goods were up about that percentage. Th'
me that peoples habits remained the same and that they were not
switching to beer or wine. Our liquor sales represented 33.7% of
our total sales.
~ 7 ¢ (~ pr~nted on recycied paper
J & J, I
FI NANClAL STATEMENT
MUNICIPALLIQUOR STORE, ClI~ OF MOUND,
MN.
The City of Mound hereby submits a statement of the financial
affairs of the Municipal Liquor Store for the year ended
Dec. 31, 1992, showing a balance sheet and a statement of
operations as prescribed by the Office of the State Auditor
in accordance with Minnesota Statute 471.6985.
Respectfullysubmitted,
Gino Businaro
Finance Director
02/12/93
liquor92
ASSETS
CITY OF MOUND - MUNICIPALLIQUOR STORE
BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1992
Current Assets:
Cash and Investments
Inventory at Cost
Other
Fixed Assets:
Furniture and Fixtures
Less: Accumulated Depr.
TOTAL ASSETS
1992
$184,166
94,125
2,370
54,868
(47,031)
~288,498
1991
$168,637
94,824
739
Difference
51,840
(46,430)
~269,610
$15,529
(699)
1,631
0
0
3,028
(601 )
$18,888
LIABILITIESAND FUND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Accounts Payable
Fund Equity:
Retained Earnings
TOTAL LIABILITI ES AND
FUND EQUITY
$70,690
217,808
~288,498
$69,611
199,999
$269,610
$1,079
17,809
8,888
SUMMARYANALYSIS OF MOUND MUNICIPALLIQUOR OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 1992
TOTAL SALES
Less: Cost of Goods Sold
Gross Profit
Gross Profit as a Percent of Sales
Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Nonoperating Revenues
1992 1991
$1.207.388 $1,144.683
921,777 873,711
285,611 270,972
23.66% 23.67%
171,933 173,134
113,678 97,838
10,882 8,987
NET INCOME BEFORE TRANSFERS
Difference
$62,705
48,066
14,639
(1,201)
15,84O
1,895
~;124,560 ~;106,825 ~;17,735
AD DITIO NAL IN FOR MATIO N
Transfers from Liquor Store Profits to City Funds:
Sealcoat Fund
General Fund
Capital ImprovementFund
TOTAL TRANSFERS
1992 1991
$52.000 $53,988
8,750 8,550
46,000 O
~;106,750 ~;62,538
Difference
($1.988)
200
46,000
~;44,212
1992 Annual Liquor Store Report
February 9, 1993
Page 2
WINE SALES
One of the more pleasant surprises of the year occurred in
this department. Sales were $166,732. This was a 7.5% increase
over 1991. An increase in wine, such as this is really good
because our profit margins in this area are the highest. I
attribute this success to two factors. One, our selection has
slowly grown over the years and word has gotten out that we carry
items that other retailers in the area don't handle. Plus, our
purchasing power is such that we can offer low prices for our
ill can maintain the proper mark-up pricing
consumers and we st . - ---~---~n~ more "in store
structure, secondly, we n~ve .~%%nt~%%~t~'~e~efits that wine
tasting", thus educating people, aDouu _ staff has also shown a
can have when used in moderation. My
· . ' st in learning more about wines. For the last two
genuine lntere ~ ~ ' rmational wine tasting at the
holidays, we have had an employee info
home of one of our employees. This was done at their request and
not mine. This indicates to me a commitment by my employees to the
store and to the city that goes beyond what the job description
requires of them. For this I want to applaud and commend them for
their sincere efforts. Wine sales represented 13.7% of our total
sales. This is nearly a whole percentage point above the previous
year.
MIX AND MISCELLANEOUS
When I inform you of the increase in this department I don't
want you to think we were doing anything illegal. Sales were
$56,528 which is a 40% increase! Why? The answer in one word is
cigarettes. 1992 was the first full year that we sold cigarettes
over the counter and not out of a leased vending machine. We only
sold cigarettes over the counter in 1991 for six months. So this
incredible rise in miscellaneous is easily explained. Our mix and
miscellaneous sales represents 4.7% of our total sales.
TOTAL SALES
Adding all these departments together we arrive at $1,213,044
total sales for 1992 From this total we have to deduct $5,686.
This figure accounts 'for 10% discounts that we give customers when
they purchase three bottles of liquor or more, that are not on sale
and to those who buy non sale wine items on Monday's only. The net
figure for total sales is $1,207,358. In 1991, net sales were
$1,145,000. Thus, we had an increase of $62,358. This translates
to a 5.5% increase over all. This may not seem to you like a huge
1992 Annual Liquor Store Report
February 9, 1993
Page 3
success, but you have to keep in mind that most outlets experienced
a loss in sales, or at best, a year of flat sales. Taking the
sales of $1,207,358 and subtracting the cost of these goods (which
was $921,078) we come up with a gross profit of $286,460. This is
a gross profit percentage of 23.7% which is where we should be.
OPERATING EXPENSES
As you can see, I am taking you through this step by step. We
have the gross profit number of $286,460. From this figure we have
to look at what it took in dollars to run the operation. I had
budgeted $178,920 (includes $3000 for Capital Outlay) for 1992. In
1992, I managed to keep my part-time wages down, my operating
supplies I kept down, my utilities were less, and so on. The
bottom line is that I spent $171,863. So $286,460 less $171,863
equals a profit for the store of $114,597. Gino has also informed
me that our interest earned for the year was $10,548. So, you are
looking at a total picture of approximately $125,145. Please
remember that these are not the audited figures. There probably
will be some adjustments here and there. Also, keep in mind that
this is my analysis only. But at least you have something to look
at.
The only other major item of concern that I want to report on
are our new cash registers. They were installed in April and have
~roven already to be a tremendous a .
~v~ntory time when we reco,~A ~se~ f~r our operation, a
wna~ we should ha~,~ ~ ..... ..~. une actual phvsica~ ........ ~
~c ~mprovement immediately ~ver ~t~ven~-Ory la,gar, I noticed
~ e~ures. There were ~uite = ~ .... ~- u .o~ our .old inventor
= ~ ~=w ~ss dlscre~= ........ Y
previous years which is due to the accuracy provided by this new
~,,~x=~ =nan in the
PLU (Price Look Up) system. Another area where they have helped is
in reducing the amount of time that Julie and I spent doing book
and paper work. They actually cut in half the time that we used to
spend. And as far as stocking is concerned, we now can put up
merchandise in one third the time than we previously could. I
would go as far as to say that in all likelihood, the system has
probably paid for itself in only its first year.
JK:ls
,I, I I
LEN HARRELL
Chief of Police
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Telephone 472-0621
Dispatch 525-6210
Fax 472-0656
EMERGENCY 911
February 12, 1993
Mr. Ed Shukle, city Manager
City of Mound
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mr. Shukle:
Contained within the following pages is the annual report for
the police department. The report addresses the budget,
personnel, training, equipment, community education,
statistics, and emergency preparedness.
This has been a year that we have experienced some very major
personnel changes. Sgt. Brad Roy and officer Ron Bostrom
retired after over 25 years of service, each, to the city of
Mound. officer Todd Limond, our D.A.R.E. officer, resigned to
assume a police officer position with Minnetonka Police.
Three young officers were hired to fill those vacancies.
The department continued its relationship with the Southwest
Metro Drug Task Force and Sgt. Hudson continued as the
administrator/coordinator and is doing an excellent job. We
continued to present the D.A.R.E. program in the 5th grade
and started an elementary school program; with excellent
community support. The budget expenditures were .34% under
projections as of February 1, 1993. There is one significant
1992 purchase that has not been paid and is not yet posted.
Part I and Part II offenses accounted for 1,086 calls for
service, consistent with 1991. Total contacts were up by
3.7%, but Part I offenses were down by 6.3%.
The department continues to emphasize dedication to the
community through the highest standards of service and through
quality training for its employees. The department
implemented a "citizen Comment Card" feedback survey that is
handed out on traffic encounters and randomly sent to our
service ,'customers" ·
Len ~arre~, ,~ef __MOUND~ POLICE'DEPARTMENT
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
X.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Budget Administration
Organizational Chart
Personnel
Training
Equipment
Community Education
.Statistics
Emergency Preparedness
Southwest Metro Drug Task Force
PAGE
1
2
3
4
13
15
16
18
27
28
t I
INTRODUCTIO~
The mission of the Mound Police Department is to
provide protection and service to the people of
Mound. Many of the activities of the police
department are described and summarized in this
report for 1992.
MOUND POLICE MISSION STATEMENT:
The Mound Police Department, through teamwork and
cooperation, will be responsive to our citizens'
needs with a professional level of dedicated
service, officers will display the highest
integrity, an4 regard each citizen with a focused
and unbiased attitude. Our citizens will determine
our success.
Much of how a police department is evaluated is
based on statistics, as found in this report.
Information for these statistics comes from internal
record-keeping and also from participation in the
Minnesota Criminal Justice System (CJIS).
In analyzing the crime statistics, several factors
need to be considered:
1. Population density
2. Proximity to metropolitan area
3. Population composition
4. Population stability
5. Number, sophistication, and development of
police personnel
The only area that the police department has control
is the fifth category. The police department is
consistently looking at ways to better utilize and
train personnel to provide better service.
The report is provided to highlight the most
important areas of police department activity and to
be used as a gauge for evaluating service. The
report includes some comparisons to past years and
provides a tool for planning activities in the years
to come.
II.
DUDGET ADMINISTRATION
The 1992 police budget will close out a little over
(1.5%) projections. The final expenditures for the
police department will amount to approximatley
$750,000.00. The percentage of expenditures breaks
out as follows:
Personnel
Insurance
Capitol Outlay
Training/Travel
(includes P.O.S.T.)
Fuel/Repairs
All Other
TOTAL
$604,242.00 80.6%
35,465.00 4.7%
13,500.00 1.8%
9,910.00 1.3%
38,215.00 5.1%
48,668.00 6.5%
$750,000.00 100%
Fund 60 (vehicle, 23,853.00
phones, software)
Insurance costs were up from last year. There were
hiring costs and training costs for new employees.
We experienced significant vehicle repair costs by
keeping vehicles on the road with over 60,000 miles.
The over-time budget was exceeded by needing to
cover shifts necessitated by the personnel changes.
The police department generated revenues of $60,009
from court fines and violations. Animal licenses
and pick-ups accounted for $2,176 of revenue.
Accident reports generated $1,240.
Minnesota Police Pension and P.O.S.T. Board
reimbursements totaled $59,468 and $4,267
respectively. The Southwest Metro Drug Task Force
reimbursed the department $62,080 for officers
assigned to the task force; two for three months and
one for the full year.
IV.
Personnel
Sworn Personnel:
Chief of Police
Sergeants
Investigators
D.A.R.E. Officer
Patrol Officers
Drug Task Force
Sergeant
Total Sworn Personnel
Non-Sworn Personnel:
Police Secretary
Part-Time Personnel:
Code Enforcement Off.
1.0
1.5
2.0
.5
6.0
11.0
1.0
12.0
1.0
1.0
Total Police Personnel 14.0
(. 75 FTE) *
(13.75 FTE),
*FTE = Full Time Equivalent
! I I
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PERSONNEL ROSTER
1991
Chief of Police
Leonard Harrell
Staff Serqeant
William Hudson
(Assigned to Drug Task Force)
Patrol Sergeant
Brad Roy (Retired 6/92)
John McKinley
Steve Grand
Investiqator/Liaison Todd Truax
Gary Lotton (one year training position)
Patrol officers
Ron Bostrom (Retired 9/92)
John Ewald
Todd Limond (Resigned 11/92)
Darrell Huggett & Canine "Rambo"
Daniel Niccum
Amy Christenson
Troy Denneson (Hired 11/92)
Jason Swensen (Hired 12/92)
Police Secretary
shirley Hawks
Code Enforcement officer
June Hyland
Police Reserves
Tom Berent
Sarah Nassett
Jason Swenson
Sherry Zuccaro
Jeff Fleming
James Fox
Kathleen Fox
Tom Geyen
Dick Qunell
Sam Nelson
Paul Haarstad
Jason Maas
Larry Lyng
Terry Erdman
Lind Norton
Patrick Cole
Robin Liljeberg
In 1992, the police department started the year with
thirteen sworn officers, including two officers
assigned to the Southwest Metro Drug Task Force.
Sgt. Hudson was assigned to be the task force
administrator and Officer Lotton worked with him
until April when Lotton was replaced by an officer
from Chaska. Officer Christenson was laid off for a
period of about five weeks due to the task force
change. John McKinley was promoted to Sergeant in
May after competing with four other officers for the
promotion. McKinley,s position was funded by the
task force reimbursement for Sgt. Hudson. After the
retirement of Sgt. Roy, Officer Christenson was re-
hired and Steve Grand was promoted to Sergeant in
September. Two officers were hired after Officer
Bostrom retired and Officer Limond resigned.
The department has continued with regular
evaluations of the police employees. In general,
the officers have been doing a fine job in serving
the community. There was some disciplinary action
with individual officers and their conduct is being
monitored. There were five internal investigations
initiated with disciplinary action taken in two of
the cases.
Citizen Comment Cards
In February, the department initiated a feedback
system to solicit input form our citizens on how the
police department is serving the community. The
cards are handed out by officers on all traffic
encounters and I randomly send cards to citizens who
have had a "call for service,, contact. The rating
is on a four point basis; poor=0 and excellent=4.
The department average for our overall service is
rated at 3.55 based on over 500 responses. The rate
of return is about 21%.
Psychological re-evaluations were given to two
officers in 1992. The process continues the
psychological testing for each officer every five
years.
The department has again maintained involvement in
the Southwest Metro Drug Task Force and has received
reimbursement for officers provided as agents. The
communities involved are Chanhassen, Carver County,
South Lake Minnetonka,~ st' Boni/Minnetrista, Scott
County, Shakopee, 'Chaska, McLeod County, and Prior
Lake. See section X for the annual report of the
Southwest Metro Drug Task Force.
officer Huggett continues to work with "Rambo" and
has consistently been training with him. "Rambo"
earned a P.D. #1 certification through the United
States Police Canine Ass'n.
The Mound Police Reserves continue to do an
excellent job for the community and the police
department, officer Ewald has been assigned the
liaison for the reserves. Unit strength averaged
around fifteen volunteers for 1992. The Mound
Police Reserves combined to donate a total of 5,705
hours.
Child protection cases accounted for 63
investigations in 1992. There were 26 criminal
sexual contact cases reported; up significantly.
Total contacts were up 3.7%. Part I offenses were
down 6.3%, but Part II offenses were up 5.4%.
Larcenies, burglaries, and vehicle thefts were down
in 1992.
The investigators worked on several cases of
significance during the year. Investigator Grand
worked up several major cases involving the abuse of
children. One involved the grandfather and several
grandchildren, one involved the father of a couple
of adopted children, and another involved
pornography and contact with juvenile girls.
Convictions were handed down in each of these cases.
Investigator McKinley worked a large case involving
telecommunications fraud across many states and
including a couple from Mound. Individuals have
been charged in both the United States and Mexico.
McKinley also worked on several cases of theft and
burglary and was able to solve and recover property
from at least six diferent incidents in Mound.
Investigator Truax worked up a case of residential
burglary in which the resident was attacked and
bitten during an altercation; the defendent was
convicted and received an extended prison term.
Truax solved several cases involving a "ring" of
local thieves and recovered property from assorted
thefts from Mound and the Lake area. Truax was also
able to resolve a five year old child abuse case
involving several other jurisdictions and gained a
confession from the perpetrator.
Officers and staff used a total of 430 days of
benefit time during 1992. The time off included
approximately 151 vacation days, 114 holidays, 70
comp days, and 95 sick days. Officers earned 649
hours of comp-time and 837 hours of overtime during
the year.
The retirement of two veteran officers, Sgt. Roy and
Officer Bostrom, and the resignation of Officer
Limond made a significant impact on our department
in 1992. With Sgt. Hudson being re-assigned to the
task force and Sgt. Roy leaving there was the
opportunity to promote two sergeants. The testing
process took place in the spring and John McKinley
was promoted in May and Steve Grand was promote in
September. Replacements for Bostrom and Limond were
hired in November and December after a testing
process was begun in the late summer. There was a
need during all of these changes to "juggle" the
schedule and some shifts had to be filled with
overtime. There was a period when officers were
working twelve hour shifts to cover shortages! We
should be done with training and back to normal
strength by late spring of 1993.
Another significant impact was the injury, off-duty,
to one of the officers. Several weeks were missed
and had to be filled with overtime.
MOUND POLICE RESERVES ANNUAL REPORT
The Mound Police Reserves donated 5,705 hours in
1992. The unit has averaged 15 individuals for the
past year and those people have been very active in
serving the community.
The police reserves assisted in providing
the following security services and/or police back-
up at:
Emergency call outs
Reserve squad - house checks
High school dances
Hockey and football games
Mound city Days
EFCE Public Safety Day
Rotary Dinner for 100
officer Friendly assists
Westonka Homecoming parade
M.D.A. Telethon
Wayzata fireworks
Westonka senior overnight party
Incredible Festival
Child finger printing
Halloween and ,,Kiddie" parades
Jaycees Bike Rodeo
Homecoming Parade
christmas Tree Lighting
Our Lady of the Lake Marathon
PTO Variety Show
Memorial Day Parade
Mound Westonka High School Graduation
Fish Fry
Traffic Direction (emergencies)
Transports
Operation Clean Sweep
Recycling Drop off
Crime Prevention
D.A.R.E. assists
The Mound Police Reserves received training in
first-aid and CPR, defensive tactics, and new
officers attended the Hennepin County Reserve
Officers Course.
Finances:
The reserves continue to raise their own funds and
are predominantly self-sufficient. The emergency
preparedness budget also contributes funds to the
maintenance of training and equipment for the police
reserves.
The police reserve account has about $5,700 in
balance. The severance fund encumbrance is
approximately $2,800.00
! ! I
MOUND POLICE RESERVES
YEARLY REPORT
1992
DETAILS
EMER RES COMM H/F TRAIN INSTR RIDE MEET-
C/O SQUAD SERV BALL ING TION ALONG ADMIN ING TOTAL
NAME
F c:,::.::, d i m 25.0 24 · 0 :32.. 0 2:0.0 7.0 3:1.0 16 ?. 0 15.0 :32 :E:. 0
Geyen 16.0 4.5 67.0 19.5 - - 5.5 162.0 12.0 286.5
Nor'bon 52.0 80. PS 49.0 'P. 5 69.5 - 70.5 122.0 14.5 46'7.5
Lyng 13.0 43.0 64.5 21.0 75.0 t01.5 21.5 11.5 '?.51.0
Cole 4.5 2.0 13.5 2';;' 5 - /- c, 2
Haarst. ad 6.5 5:3.5 62.5 :3.0 20.0 - 1:35.5 11.0 7.0 '2'~)?. 0
r4aas 30.0 61.0 72.5 6.0 44.5 2~2.0 174.5 1.0 ',B.O 4:37.5
ssett 2.0 - :32.0 - - ............
Qune 11 12.0 5?. 0 57.0 1:3.0 216.0 - 25:3.5 :30.0 6. Fi 647.0
Ranum 8.5 8.0 7.0 '7.5 87.0 - 16.0 - 4.0 140.0
Swenson, J 5.P~ 16.5 18.5 7.0 - - 78.0 - 5.0 130.5
Erdman 11.5 ?. 5 1.0 4.0 ?6.0 - 'P. 5 = 6. C) 137.5
Ringate - - I. 5 - ~9.5 - - - 4.0 65.0
K o e p p ..... 6'F/. 0
T'OTAL 258.0 6:_~:'.:). 5 ,~,4F_. 0 16:::. 5 12:32.0 26.0 1552..$ :.~: 18 .$ 16,/:,. A ._,/ .....
R1 Fo::.::, J. R17 Cole? F'.
R2 Geyen, T. RI'.:.-/ Fleming, J.
R:_--'. Fo::.::, K. R22.:: Haar'stad, F'.
R4 I_iljeberg, R. R57 Lyng, L.
R5 Nor. ton, L. R24 Maas, Jasc:,n
R t t (~Ltlae 11, D. R55 Nasset t, S.
R5'.-7 Ber. ent, T. Ri() Nelson, S.
ON MEDICAL
R00 Erdman, Jr'., T.
PERCENTAGE OF HOURS BY ACTIVITY
,I, I I
PERCENTAGE OF HOURS BY RESERVE
\
'--x,L Ne/s.,.
VII.
COMMUNITY EDUCATION/SERVICk
The police department became involved with the
community in a variety of activities in 1992.
Following is a brief description of the activities.
Erime Prevention
Officer Ewald -has been conducting neighborhood
meetings and developing block watches. He has also
been working with several apartment complexes to
organize for Crime Watch. Presentations and
security evaluations have been done for local banks
and businesses.
~ouse_Checks
The police reserves provide a service of checking
periodically on out-of-town resident,s homes when
notification has been provided to the police
department.
~estonka Intervention Program
The poli~e department-continUes to work closely with
the intervention program to assist families that are
victims of domestic abuse.
Department Tours
The police department has conducted a number of
tours of our facility for Cub Scouts and Brownie
Scouts.
Demonstrations/Presentation:~
The police department has been involved in a number
of public presentations ranging from canine
demonstrations to talks about safety with day-care
students. The police department has talked to
groups concerning drugs, gun safety, vehicle safety,
DWI, and personal safety.
Finqerprintin~
The department provides a service of fingerprinting
individuals as may be requested. This includes both
children and adults.
Mound City Days
~he d-epar~ment was very involved in this year's
celebration. Security was provided for the parade,
the "Around Mound Run", and the fireworks.
D.A.R.E. Proqram
Drug Awareness Resistance Education has been
implemented at both Shirley Hills Elementary,
Grandview Middle School, and Our Lady of the Lake
Schools. The 17 week program is taught to all 5th
grade students and we have expanded into the 1st &
3rd grades with a 5 week program.
Westonka Community Action Network
The department has been actively involved in
assisting the task force in defining area problems
and developing a network for assisting needy
individuals. The department has been designated as
a resource for emergency ,'vouchers" for the County.
Homecominq_Parade
The department assisted the high school with setting
up a parade route and then provided security for the
parade.
Halloween Parade
Provide security for children during the parade.
Around Mound Run
This last year there was a 5 mile run and two
walking courses that we provided security for.
officer Friendly
Elementary school presentations for child safety.
YMCA Detached Worker Proqram
The department has established a working
relationship with the detached worker program. The
program assisted in providing activities for "at
risk" children in Mound.
Public Safety Da~
The police department co-sponsored a public safety
open house with Early Childhood & Family Education.
Children were finger printed, observed safety
presentations, and were able to view police, fire,
and medical equipment.
Bike Rodeo
Co-sponsored with the Mohawk Jaycees and Mound Crime
Prevention Ass'n a bike rodeo.
Members of the department are involved in several
different advisory councils that meet periodically.
VIII. STATISTICS
This section of the report analyzes the statistical
portion of the annual report. Most of the
information comes from tabulating the information
from Initial Call Reports (ICR's), informational
reports, and traffic citations.
The total number of ICR's in a year is useful for
comparing the level of activity of the department
relative to previous years. It also allows for
comparison between personnel changes and activity
levels. Some reporting changes were made in 1986 to
alleviate statistical duplication that was found in
the previous system.
TOTAL INCIDENTS PER YEAR
1986 THROUGH 1992
yEAR TOTAL
INCIDENTS/MONTH
1986 14,078 1,173
1987 13,445 1,120
1988 15,582 1,298
1989 14,559 1,213
1990 13,680 1,140
1991 13,207 1,101
1992 13,568 1,130
(Previous 6 Yr. Avg. 14,092
1,174)
1992 reflected a increase in total contacts of 2.7%.
The serious incidents of crime reported to the
police department are categorized into Part I and
Part II Offenses.
Part I Offenses:
Part I Offenses include major crimes such
as homicide, criminal sexual conduct,
robbery, assault, burglary, larceny,
vehicle theft, and arson. Although Part I
Offenses are a small percentage of
reported crimes, it is these crimes that
demand the most attention from the police
department in terms of investigation and
commitment of resources.
Part II Offenses:
Part II Offenses include the crimes of
forgery, child abuse/neglect, vandalism,
stolen property, sexual misconduct,
weapons violations, sexual misconduct,
narcotics violations, liquor violations,
DWI, simple assault, domestic assault,
embezzlement, prostitution, public peace,
runaways, and other violations.
The clearance rate for combined Part I and Part II
Offenses was 52.6%. Part I offenses were down 6%
and Part II were up 5.5% compared to last year.
Burglaries decreased 15%, larcenies decreased by
7.5%, and vehicle thefts by 27%. Criminal sexual
conduct was up 73% and arson 75%. Our combined
clearance rates increased by 5.6%.
Part I and Part II Offenses are the incidents that
necessitate the most time and effort from the police
department. Initial call time is greater in
gathering pertinent information at the scene and the
greatest amount of investigation and follow-up is
dedicated to these types of crimes.
Traffic Offenses:
Traffic offenses include both moving and
non-moving violations. An examination of
the number and percentage of traffic
stops, as part of the total number of
incidents, allows one to determine the
degree to which, vehicular traffic and
pedestrian movement affects the
department's work load. It should also be
noted that the more visible that patrols
are maintained, the more likely is the
positive impact in deterring serious
crimes.
In 1992, traffic citations accounted for
1,653 police contacts, up 4.4% from 1991.
Property damage accidents were down 12%
and personal injury accidents were down
33% from 1991. Over shadowing those
figures was the fatal pedestrian accident
that occurred in December; our first in
over eight years.
There were 63 DWI arrests (down 20%) and
of those, 25% were repeat offenders for
gross misdemeanor or aggravated
violations. The average test was .156;
down from 1991. The highest reading was a
.25; the legal limit is .10.
Property:
Property losses were valued at $227,062.00
in 1992. The department recovered
$80,672.00; or 36%.
Child Protection Cases:
The department investigated 63 child
protection cases for the year. These
cases and criminal sexual conduct cases
continue to be the single most time-
consuming cases we handle.
Domestic Dispute Cases:
The department responded to 78 domestic
situations; 42 with assaults. The number
of actual domestic assaults decreased
slightly, but the number of total
domestics remained fairly constant.
Arrests:
The police department processed and booked
239 adults in 1992. There were 40 adults
arrested for felonies, 262 adults for
misdemeanors, 56 juveniles arrested for
felonies, and 83 juveniles arrested for
misdemeanors.
In addition, 91 formal complaints were
issued for a variety of crimes.
Animal Complaints:
The department responded to 896 animal
complaints during 1992.
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT
1985
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
Hazardous Citation 1,225 1,56[ 1,172 1,333 1,429 1,082 835 710
Non-Hazardous Citations 949 668 519 617 356 340 280 323
Hazardous Warnings 461 685 417 346 137 74 32 138
Non-Hazardous Warnings 1,216 1,311 868 643 351 333 341 421
Verbal Warnings 1,521 1,368 1.503 1,273 1,143
Parking Citations 1,075 738 497 639 604 381 468 569
Dg! 106 127 104 91 62 97 79 63
Over. 10 75 95 75 44 35 71 52 44
Property Damage Accidents 1[5 96 99 121 102 74 98 86
Perscxaal Injury Accidents 47 29 36 36 29 21 33 22
Fatal Accidents 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
37 52 44 36 51 61 48 62
450 447 281 359 335 590 404 426
57 50 59 79 35 50 21 56
110 175 120 108 68 206 115 91
*Adult Felony Arrests
*Adult Misdemeanor Arrests
*Juvenile Felony Arrests
*Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests
Part I Offenses
Reported 360 381 372 417 353 322 378 354
Cleared 48 113 86 80 109 112 91 131
Arrests Made 81 67 74 70 75 91 55 96
Part II Offenses
Reported 676 904 789 857 725 767 694 732
Cleared 234 617 457 209 227 493 438 441
Arrests Made 160 359 311 319 242 401 331 345
Medicals 276 168 218 274 315 371 325 300
Animal Complaints 1,318 1,205 1,128 1,091 1,097 8~7 1,105 896
Other General Investigations 6,621 5,043 5,442 6,729 6,780 6,280 6,503 6,983
TOTAL 15,174 13,890 13,234 15,407 14,232 13,276 13,084 13,420
Assists 777 521 691 672 549 631 896
Follow-ups 527 520 600 297 192 164 299
Mutual Aid 188 211 175 210 160 123 148
*Also includes warrant arrests through 1988
?oi
PART I CRIMES
OFFENSES
REPORTED
YEARLY REPORT,
CLEARED EXCEPT.
UNFOUNDED CLEARED
1992
CLEARED
ARREST
ARRESTED
ADULT JUVENILE
Nomicide
1 1 0 0
Criminal Sexual Conduct 26 5 4 8
RoM~ery 1 0 0
Aggravated Assau[t 5 0
1 2 4
Burglary 63 5 5
Larceny 232 7
Vehicle Theft 10 23
19 45
Arson 3 3 5
7 0 0 0
TOTAL
0 0
7
0 0
1 3
6 4
25 46
1 2
0 0
354
25
37
PART Il CRIME~
Child Ab~se/Neglect 51 18
Forgery/NSF Checks 36 1 13
Criminal Da~ge to Property 111
Weapons 0 13
13
Narcotics 0 3
17
liqJor Laws 0 1
DWI 44 0 2
63
Sidle Assault 0
53
Do~stic Assault
42 1 12
Domestic (No Assault) 36
Narassraent 0 0
124 3 23
Runaway/Incorrigibility/Truancy 49
Public Peace 0 13
24
Trespassing 1 3
7 1 4
All Other Offenses 62 3 10
TOTAL
69
4
11
8
8
16
4O
62
14
23
0
25
34
17
0
11
4O
4
12
6
10
19
61
61
21
0
23
0
17
0
15
56
0
3
4
0
2
16
1
2
2
0
1
51
0
0
1
~32
PART I11 & PART IV
Property D~ge Accidents 86
Persona[ Injury Accidents 22
Fatal Accidents
Medica[s
300
Animal Complaints 896
Mutual Aid
148
Other Genera[ Investigations 6,983
TOTAL
33
135
273
262
83
8,436
Hennepin County Child Protection 63
CHIPS
TOTAL 0
9,581
58
172
342
302
139
I
,! I t I
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT
YEAR 1992
GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY
Hazardous citations
Non-Hazardous citations
Hazardous Warnings
Non-Hazardous Warnings
Verbal Warnings
Parking Citations
DWI
Over .10
Property Damage Accidents
Personal Injury Accidents
Fatal Accidents
Adult Felony Arrests
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests
Adult Misdemeanor Citations
Juvenile Felony Arrests
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests
Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations
Part I Offenses
Part II Offenses
Medicals
Animmal Complaints
Other Public Contacts
YEAR TO
DATE
710
323
138
421
1,143
569
63
44
86
22
1
62
426
113
56
91
45
354
732
300
896
6,983
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
835
280
32
341
1,273
468
79
52
98
33
0
48
324
80
21
66
49
378
694
325
1,105
6,503
TOTAL
Assists
Follow-Ups
Henn. County Child Protection
Mutual Aid Given
Mutual Aid Requested
13,578
896
299
63
148
55
13,084
631
164
55
123
46
1
Run: 16-Feb-93 8:40 PRO03
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Primary ISN~s on(y: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92 Enfors Property Report
Activity codes':
--- .. STOLEN/RECOVERED BY DATE REPORTED
Prop Prop lnc no ISN Pr Prop Date Rptd Stolen Date
Tp Oesc
SN Stat Stolen Value Recov'd
Recov,d Quantity Act Brand Mc. Jet Off-1 Off-2
Value Code
Assnd Assnd
5 Prop type Tote[s:
10,200 0
9 Prop type Totals:
310
0
A Prop type Totals:
82,500
49,000
B Prop type Totals:
4,623 3,022
C Prop type Tote[s:
3,490
0
D Prop type Tota[s:
4,162
1,363
E Prop type Totals:
1,233 129
G Prop type Totals:
150
0
H Prop type Totals:
6,265
1,800
I Prop type Totals:
19,800 3,100
J Prop type Totals:
22,306 405
0 Prop type Totals:
300
0
P Prop type Totals:
20
0
O Prop type Totals:
1,800 1,800
R Prop type Totals:
18,724 4,105
S Prop type Tote[s:
16,633 11,159
T Prop type Totals:
15.109
146
U Prop type Totals:
2,000
0
V Prop type Tote[s:
150
0
~ Prop type Tote[s:
5,041
2,210
X Prop type Tote[s:
6,221 483
Y Prop type Totals:
6,025
1,950
**** Report Totals:
227,062 80,672
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000
Page
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
YEARLY REPORT, 1992
CITATIONS
DWI
More than .10% BAC
Careless/Reckless Driving
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speeding
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired, or No Plates
Illegal Passing
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H&R Leaving the Scene
No Insurance
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog Ordinances
Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
MV/ATV
Miscellaneous Tags
TOTAL
ADULT
63
44
5
66
11
551
5
5
160
1
44
2
17
2
8
3
2
569
10
27
6
84
1
4--1
1,727
JUV
0
1
3
1
2
31
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
48
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
YEARLY REPORT, 1992
WARNINGS
NO Insurance
Traffic
Equipment
Crosswalk
Animals
Trash/Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
Trespassing
Window Tint
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
~ARRANT ARRESTS
Felony:
Misdemeanor:
_ADULT
189
121
157
0
34
82
0
0
7
52
642
22
164
J~
31
21
21
0
0
0
0
0
1
6
8O
0
8
7-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
primary ISN's onty: No
Ds -ported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Til,. dnge each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received: ALL
Activity Resulted: AIL
Dispositions: All
Officers/Badges: ALL
Grids:
Patrol Areas: ALL
Days of the week: All
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Calls For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE
ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF
DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS
9000 SPEEDING 551
9001 J-SPEEDING 31
9002 NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L 5
9003 J-NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L 1
9004 RESTRICTED D/L 5
9006 TEST REFUSAL 14
~ 3AC OVER .10 44
9011 J'BAC OVER .10 1
9012 OPEN BOTTLE 11
9013 J-OPEN BOTTLE 2
9014 STOP SIGN 44
9015 J'STOP SIGN 2
9016 FAILURE TO YIELD 2
9018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION 13
9019 J-EQIPMENT VIOLATION 4
9020 CARELESS/RECKLESS 5
9021 J-CARELESS/RECKLESS
9022 EXHIBITION DRIVING 6
902~ J-EXHIBITION DRIVING 2
90~ ILLEGAL/UNSAFE TURNS
9026 OVER THE CENTER LINE 2
9027 J-OVER THE CENTER LINE 1
Page
?o?
Run: 7-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
Primary ISN's onty: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received:
Activity Resulted:
Dispositions:
Officers/Badges: AIl
Grids:
Patrot Areas:
Days of the week:
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Ca[Is For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
Page
ACTIVITY COOE
DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF
INCIDENTS
9029 J-DRIVING ON PARK PROP. 1
9030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION
10
9032 NO PASSING
1
9034 STOP ARM VIOLATION
4
9036 OBSTRUCTED VISION
2
9038 ALL OTHER TRAFFIC
10
9039 J-ALL OTHER TRAFFIC
9040 NO SEATBELT
9041 J-NO SEATBELT
2
9050 ALLC~ING INCOMPETENT TO DRIVE
9100 PARKING/ALL OTHER
131
9140 NO PARKING/WINTER HOURS 423
9150 NO TRAILER PARKING
15
9200 DAS/DAR/DAC
66
9201 J-DAS/DAR/DAC
1
9210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED 160
9211 J-PLATES/NO-EXPIRED-IMPROPER 1
)220 NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF
8
)240 CHANGE OF DOMICILE
4
'300 LOST ARTICLES/OTHER
301 LOST PERSONS
3
309 FOUND/RUNAWAY
?Og 8
,. J I, i
Run: 7-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
P~imary ISN~s only: No
'eported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received: ALl
Activity Resulted: All
Dispositions: Att
Officers/Badges: All
Grids: Att
Patrol Areas: Att
Days of the week:
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Carts For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
A:TIVITY COOE NUMBER OF
DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS
9310 FOUND/ ALL OTHERS 1
9312 FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS 56
9313 FOUND PROPERTY 62
9314 FOUND VEHICLES/IMPOUNDED 11
9315 UNCLAIME DESTROYED ANIMALS 23
9410 FATAL ACCIDENTS 1
DERELICT AUTO 6
9430 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS 21
9440 H/R PERSONAL INJURY ACC. 1
9450 PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS 72
9451 H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC. 14
9452 H & R ACCIDENTS g/TICKET 2
9500 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE ACC/OTHER 4
9560 MEDICAL/AB 1
~'~561 DOG BITE 15
9'562 CAT BITES 1
9563 DOG AT LARGE 12
9564 DOG BARKING 1
95(;~ ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS 27
9/~u MEDICAL/SU 1
9710 MEDICA1/ASU 20
9720 MEDICAL/DOA 5
Page
Run: 7-Jan-g3 8:53 CFS08
Primary ISN's on[y: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
Now Received: AIl
Activity Resulted: AIl
Dispositions: AIl
Officers/Badges:
Grids: AIl
Patrol Areas:
Days of the week: AIl
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Ca[Is For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF
DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS
9750 MEDICALS
9751 MEDICALS/DX
9732 MEDICALS/CI
9735 I00 INJURY
9750 FIRES
9800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED
9801 DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT
229
32
12
1
4
44
36
5
1
63
53
1
2
1
2
39
3
3
9
10
194
25
9802 PUBLIC ASSIST
9810 LOITERING/LURKING
9900 ALL HCCP CASES
9904 O~EN DOOR/ALARMS
9910 NISC. SERVICES BY OFFICERS
9911 JUVENILE STATUS OFFENSES
991] CHIPS
9920 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
9930 HANDGUN APPLICATION
~943 PROULER
~944 UNWANTED GUEST
~945 SUSPICIOUS PERSON
~50 INFO/IHT
~80 WARRANTS
990 NISC. VIOLATIONS
Page
Run: ?-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
Primary ISN'$ only: No
eported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Tl,,~ range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received: All
Activity Resulted: All
Dispositions: All
Officers/Badges: All
Grids: All
Patrol Areas: All
Days of the week: Att
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Calls For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE
ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF
DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS
9991 J-MISC. VIOLATIONS
9992 MUTUAL AID/8100
9993 MUTUAL AID/6500
9994 MUTUAL AID/ AL1 OTHER
9996 MUTUAL AID/NARCOTICS
ASLT 2-1NFLICTS BOO ILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-FAM
ASLT 2-1NFLICTS BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-ACQ
ASLT 2-1NFLICTS BODILY HARM'OTH WEAP-ADLT-FAM
A2342 ASLT 2-1NFLICTS BOO ILY HARM-OTH WEAP-ADLT-ACQ
A2512 ASLT 2-THREAT BODILY HARM-POS FRRM-ADLT-ACQ
A3255 ASLT 3-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-HANDS ETC-CHLD-ACQ
A4057 ASLT 4-ACT NOT APPLICABLE-HAND ETC-POL1CE
A5002 ASLT 5-UNKNOgN ACT-NO WEAPON-ADLT-ACQ
A5053 ASLT 5-UNKNOWN ACT-HANDS ETC-ADLT-STR
A5303 ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-NO WEAP-ADLT-STR
A5314 ASLT 5-1NFLT BODILY HARM-POSS FRRM-CHLD-FAM
A5331 ASLT 5-1NFLT BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-FAM
A53§1 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM
A53S~ ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC
A53ba ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS NRM-NANDS-ADLT-STR
A5354 ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATIEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM
A5355 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATIEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ
1
62
48
32
6
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
36
11
4
27
15
A2331
A,
A2341
Page
Run: ?-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
Primary ISN's onty: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received: AiL
Activity Resulted:
Dispositions: ALL
Officers/Badges: Alt
Grids: ALL
Patrol Areas: ALL
Days of the week: ALL
ACTIVITY COOE
DESCRIPTION
A5501 ASLT 5-THRT BOOILY HARM-NO NEAP-ADLT-FAM
A5502 ASLT 5-THRT BOO ILY HARM-NO NEAP-ADLT-ACQ
A5552 ASLT 5'THRT BOOILY HARM-HANDS ETC-ADLT-ACQ
A8602 ASLT'COERCION-MS-THREAT DMGE PROP-ADLT-ACQ
A9660 TERROR-THRT INFLT PRO DM-EXPLO INCEN-UNK RELAT
81134 BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-D-UNK NEAP-COM THEFT
81161 BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-N-UNK NEAP-COM ASSAULT
81165 BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-N-UNK NEAP-COM PROPERTY
81264 BURG I-OCC RES NO FRC-N-UN NEAP-CON THEFT
~3334 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
33364 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
13394 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-COM THEFT
13434 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK ~EAP-COM THEFT
3464 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-N-UNK NEAP-COM THEFT
3494 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-CON THEFT
5764 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
5~94 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK NEAP-CON THEFT
;894 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK NEAP-COM THEFT
360 BURG 4-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
390 BURG 4-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
430 BURG 4-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK I~/EAP-UNK ACT
~90 BURG 4-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-UNK AQCT
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Ca[ts For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIs BY ACTIVITY COOE
NUMBER OF
INCIDENTS
3
15
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
Z
1
?
5
1
?
2
5
1
1
3
1
Page
Run: 7-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
Primary ISN~s onty: No
P'Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received: All
Activity Resulted: All
Dispositions: Att
Officers/Badges: Att
Grids: Att
Patrol Areas: Att
Days of the week: ALt
ACTIVITY COOE
DESCRIPTION
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Carts For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
NUMBER OF
INCIDENTS
B4760 BURG 4-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 4
B4790 BURG 4-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 1
B4890 BURG 4-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 3
B4930 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-D-UNK WEAP'UNK ACT 1
B4960 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT 1
84990 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT 5
C FORGERY'FE'MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PUB OFF 1
C1211 FORGERY-FE-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-PERSON 1
C1912 FORGERY-FE-OTHER ACT-CHECK-BUSINESS 1
C2111 FORGERY'GM-MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PERSON 1
C3111 FORGERY-MS-MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PERSON 2
C3211 FORGERY-MS-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-PERSON 5
C3212 FORGERY-MS'UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-BUSINESS
D3250 DRUGS-SCH 2 NARCOTIC-SELLING-COCAIN-UNK CHAR 1
D3550 DRUGS-SCB 2 NARCOTIC-POSSESS-COCAIN-OTH CHAR 1
D8500 DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSSESSION 6
DA540 DRUGS-SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARIJ-UNK 1
DC500 DRUGS'DRUG PARAPH-POSSESS-UNK-UNK 4
E4700 ESC-GM-FLEE AN OFFICER 1
Fl~ ARSON 1-UNINHB-NOI~EA-SG RESID-$20000 MORE 1
F2262 ARSON 2-UNINHAB-NO gEA-PUB BLDG-lO000'19999 1
F3082 ARSON 3-FE-UNK COND-MTR VEH-$10000-$19999 1
Page
Run: ?-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
Primary ISN's on(y: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received: A((
Activity Resulted: Al(
Dispositions: A((
Officers/Badges: A((
Grids: A((
Patrol Areas: Al(
Days of the week: A((
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors CaJJs For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
NUMBER OF
ACTIVITY COOE
DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS
F4005 ARSON 3-MS-UNK COND-OT PROP-S299 LESS 3
F4075 ARSON 3-MS-UNK COND-OT STRU-$299 LESS 1
H1034 MUR 1-UNK ACT'PREMEDITAT-KNIFE-CNLD-FAM 1
13060 CRIM AGNST FAN-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD 23
J2500 TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR 9
J2700 TRAF'ACCID-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION 12
J3500 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR 42
K4342 I(DNAP-NO HRM-SAF PLAC-TERROR-OTHR WEA-ADLT-ACQ 1
K6004 DEPRIVE OF PARENTAL RIGHTS-UNK WEAP-CHLD-FAM 2
L1021 CSC 1-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNDER 13-F 3
L1025 CSC 1-UNK ACT-PARENT-16-17-F 1
LIO?I CSC 1-UNK ACT'ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-F 1
L1073 CSC 1-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-13-15-F 1
L2022 CSC 1 ~EAP-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNDER 13-M 1
L3021 CSC 2-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNDER 13-F 1
.3029 CSC 2-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNK AGE-F 1
.3072 CSC 2-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-M 1
3832 CSC 2-MULTIPLE ACTS-GUARDIAN-UNDER 13-M 1
3841 CSC 2-MULTIPLE ACTS-OTH FAN-UNDER 13-F 1
402? CSC 2 ~EAP-FEAR GBH-UNK ACT-PARENT-18 OLDER-F 1
~031 CSC 2 WEAP-UNK ACT-GUARDIAN-UNDER 13-F 1
;032 CSC 2 S~EAP-UNK ACT-GUARDIAN-UNDER 13-M 1
Page
Run: 7-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
~c~mar¥ ISNfs only: No
~eported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
..... range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received: All
Activity Resulted: At[
Dispositions:
Officers/Badges: All
Grids: All
Patrol Areas: All
Days of the week: All
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Calls For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF
DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS
L4041 CSC 2 WEAP-UNK ACT-OTH FAM-UNDER 13-F 1
L4225 CSC 2 WEAP-FEAR GBH-PARENT-16-17-F 1
L5075 CSC 3-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-16-1?-F 1
L5115 CSC 3-NO FRC-SPOUSE-16-17-F 1
L5173 CSC 3-NO FRC-ACQUAINT-13-15-F 1
L5377 CSC 3-FRC OR COERCN-ACQUAINT-18 OLDER-F 1
L CSC 4-UNK ACT-POS AUTH-UNDER 13-F 1
L7071 CSC 4-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-F 1
L7075 CSC 4-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-16-17-F 1
L7087 CSC 4-UNK ACT-STRANGER-18 OLDER-F 1
LAA77 CSC 5-NO CONSENT CONTACT-ACQUAINT-16 TO 17-F 1
M2313 OBSTRUCT CORRESPONDENCE (POSTAL) 5
M3001 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER 14
M3003 JUVENILE-HABITUAL TRUANT 4
M4102 LIQUOR - SELLING 1
M4104 LIQUOR - POSSESSING 1
M4106 LIQUOR - PROCURING LIQUOR FOR A MINOR 1
M4130 IIQUOR-INTOX LIQUOR LICENSES-PROHIBITED ACTS 1
M41~0 LIQUOR - OTHER 26
M531~ JUVENILE-CURFEW 13
M5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY 32
M5510 HEALTH-SAFETY-FOOO-ADULTERATED 1
Page
Run: 7-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
Primary ISN~s on[y: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received: AIl
Activity Resutted: AIl
Dispositions: AIl
Officers/Badges: AIl
Grids:
Patrol Areas: AIl
Days of the week: AIl
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Ca[Is For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE
ACTIVITy COOE
DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF
INCIDENTS
M5539 HEALTN-SAFETY-NAZ WASTE-INFECTIOUS WASTE
DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION
FALSELY IMPERSONATING ANOTHER
DISTURB PEACE'GM'HARASS-ABUSE-THRT-MAiL.DELiV
M6501
M7701
N2230
1
4
1
1
7
1
5
9
1
112
1
2
2
8
6
3
1
91
5
5
7
6
N3030 DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT
N3040 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PERMIT PUBLIC NUISANCE
N3060 DISTURB PEACE-MS-CONCEALING IDENTITY
N3070 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE
N3130 DISTURB PEACE-MS-EMERGENCY TELEPHONE CALLS
N3190 DISTURB PEACE-MS-NARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
03600 OBSENITY-MS-INDECENT EXPOSURE-UNK AUD
33??2 OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE LETTER ETC-ADULT
)3881 08SENITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-MINOR
)3882 OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT
1110 PROP DAMAGE'FE-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
2120 PROP DAMAGE-GM-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT
2130 PROP DAMAGE-GM-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT
3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
H20 PROP DAMAGE'MS-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT
;130 PROP DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT
310 TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
600 LITTER-UNLAWFUL DEPOSIT OF GARBAGE-MS
Page
10
Run: 7-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
P[imary ISN's on[y: No
C 'eported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
T, .... range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received: A[[
Activity Resulted: AIL
Dispositions: Ali
Officers/Badges: All
Grids: All
Parrot Areas: All
Days of the week: AlL
ACTIVITY COOE
DESCRIPTION
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Calls For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-MONEY
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
NUMBER OF
INCIDENTS
Q1221 STLN PROP-FE-POSSESS-VEHICLE-OVER 2500 1
Q1291 STLN PROP-FE-POSSESS'OTHER PROP-OVER $2500 1
Q2293 STLN PROP-GM-POSSESS-OTHER PROP-$301'$999 1
Q2297 STLN PROP-GM-POSSESS-OTH PROP-501-2500 1
R3152 ROBB-SIMPLE-HIGHWAY-STRONGARM'ADULT-ACQ 1
T0021 THEFT-UNK LVL VAL-FRM BUILDING-MONEY 2
T THEFT-MORE $2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP 1
T2021 THEFT-$251'$2500-FE'FRM BUILDING-MONEY 7
T2029 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP 15
T2049 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM SHIPMENT-OTH PROP 1
T2059 THEFT-$251'$2500'FE-FRM YARDS'OTH PROP 2
T2159 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP 7
T2169 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM gATERCRAFT-OTH PROP 7
T2189 THEFT-$251'$2500'FE'FRM FISHHOUSE-OTH PROP 1
T4021 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-MONEY 4
T4029 THEFT-S250 LESS'MS-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP 8
T4059 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP 8
T4069 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MAIL-OTH PROP 1
T40(2~ THEFT'S250 LESS-MS-FRM SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP 5
T41~, 1
T4159 42
T4169 7
Page
11
")/?
Run: ?-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
Primary iSN's onty: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received:
Activity Resulted: Att
Dispositions: Att
Officers/Badges:
Grids: At[
Patrol Areas:
Days of the week: Att
ACTIVITY COOE
DESCRIPTION
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Calfs For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
NUMBER OF
iNCIDENTS
T4179 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM POSTAL-OTH PROP
T4189 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM FiSHHOUSE-OTH PROP
T4999 THEFT-250 LESS-MS-FRM OTHER-OTH PROP
T8159 THEFT-MORE 2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
TC021 THEFT'501-2500-FE-BUILDING-MONEY
TC029 THEFT-501-2500-FE~BUILD]NG-OTH PROP
TC059 THEFT-501-2500-FE-YARDS-OTH PROP
TC169 THEFT'501-2500-FE-UATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
TEO02 THEFT'OTHER-FE-UNKNO~N-SERVICES
TF029 THEFT'201-5OO-GM-BUILDING-OTH PROP
TF159 THEFT'201-5OO-GM-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
TF169 THEFT'201-5OO-GM-~ATERCRAFT*OTH PROP
rGO02 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-UNKNOWN-SERVICES
'G019 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-FRM PERSON-OTH PROP
G021 THEFT-LESS 200-GM*BUiLDING-MONEY
G029 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-BUILD]NG-OTH PROP
G059 THEFT-lESS 200-GM-YARDS-OTH PROP
G061 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-MAiLS-MONEY
~069 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-MAILS-OTH PROP
;099
;159
099
THEFT-LESS 200-GM-SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP
THEFT-LESS 200-GM-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
THEFT-201-5OO-MS-SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP
1
5
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
5
2
1
1
5
8
1
1
1
10
1
Page
12
I I I
Run: ?-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
P~,imary ISN's on[y: No
eported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
.... range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
Now Received: All
Activity Resulted: AIl
Dispositions:
Officers/Badges: All
Grids: Att
Parrot Areas:
Days of the week: AIl
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Calls For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE
ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF
DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS
U1013 THEFT-FE-BY CHECK-$501-$2500
U1032 THEFT-FE-BY CREDIT CARD-$2501-$19999
UIO3A THEFT-FE-BY-CREDIT-CARD-201-2500
U1513 THEFT-FE-OTHR VEH-NO MOTOR-501-2500
U1994 FRAUD-FE-OTHER ACT-301-500
U2493 THEFT-GM-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-501-2501
THEFT-GM-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-201-500
THEFT-MS-BY CHECK-200 OR LESS
THEFT-MS-ISSUE WORTHLES CHECK-S250 LESS
THEFT-MS-ISSUE WORTHLESS CHECK-200 OR LESS
THEFT-MS-BY CREDIT CARD-S250 LESS
FRAUD-MS-FRAUDULENT STATEMENT
THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-S250 LESS
THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-200 OR LESS
THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-35000-OR MORE
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-201-500
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-200 OR LESS
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO-MOTOR-35000-OR-MORE
FRAUD-MS-OTHER ACT-200 OR LESS
VEH THEFT-FE-OVER $2500-AUTO
VEH THEFT-FE-OVER $2500-TRUCK-BUS
~EH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-SNOt,/MOBILE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
13
1
7
1
1
1
19
1
2
17
1
1
3
1
1
U3018
U3026
U3028
U3036
U3250
U3286
U3288
u3289
U3497
U3498
U3499
U3~
V1021
V1022
V1024
Page 13
'217'
Run: ?-Jan-93 8:53 CFS08
Primary ISN~s only: Ho
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
How Received:
Activity Resulted: All
Dispositions: All
Officers/Badges: All
Grids:
Patrol Areas:
Days of the week:
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Calls For Service
INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE
ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF
DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS
V1025 VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-ATV
V2021 VEH THEFT-FE-$251-$2500-AUTO
V2022 VEH THEFT-FE-$251-$2500~TRUCK-BUS
V2023 VEH THEFT-FE-251-2500-MOTORCYCLE
V2024 VEH THEFT-FE-251-2500-SNOgMOBILE
V2029 VEH THEFT-FE-251-2500-BOAT-MOTORIZED
VA021 VEH-MORE THAN 2500-FE-TNEFT-AUTO
VA024 VEH-MORE THAN 2500-FE-THEFT-SNO~MOBILE
VA029 VEH-MORE THAN 2500-FE-THEFT-BOAT-MTRI
W3180 ~/EAPONS-MS-DISCHARGE-FIRE~ORKS-NO CHAR
~3190 ~/EAPONS-MS-USES-OTHER TYPE-HO CHAR
~3599 ~'EAPONS-MS-CARRY TRANS-OTHER-UNLAW PURPOS
~EAPONS-MS-POSSESS-OTHER TYPE-NO CHAR
~EAPONS-MS-OTHER ACT-FiREWORKS-NO CHAR
CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS
CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-FALSELY REPORT CRIME
CRIM AGNST GOVN-MS-ESCAPE TAX-MTR VEH
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
3
3
1
1
5
4
3
1
~3690
W3980
X3080
X3190
Y3230
Report Totals:
3,976
Page
14
! I I
Run: 3-Feb-93 15:10 OFF01
Primary ISN's only: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Ti range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
Dispositions: All
Activity codes: All
Officers/Badges: All
Grids: All
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Offense Report
OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS
Page 1
ACT ACTIVITY
CODE DESCRIPTION PENDING
ASLT-COERCION-MS-THREAT DMGE PROP-ADLT-ACQ
1ERROR-THRT INFLT PRO DM-EXPLO INCEN-UNK RELAT
BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL
REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES
A2331 ASLT 2-1NFLICTS BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-FAM 1
A2332 ASLT 2-INFLICTS BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-ACQ 2
A2341 ASLT 2-1NFLICTS BODILY HARM-OTH WEAP-ADLT-FAM 1
A2342 ASLT 2-INFLICTS BODILY HARM-OTH WEAP-ADLT-ACQ 1
A2512 ASLT 2-THREAT BODILY HARM-POS FRRM-ADLT-ACQ 1
A3255 ASLT 3-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-HANDS ETC-CHLD-ACQ 1
A4057 ASLT 4-ACT NOT APPLICABLE-HAND ETC-POLICE 1
A5002 ASLT 5-UNKNOgN ACT-NO ~EAPON-ADLT-ACQ 1
AS. ASLT 5-UNKNC~/N ACT-HANDS ETC-ADLT-STR 1
A5303 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-NO WEAP-ADLT-STR 1
A5314 ASLT 5-1NFLT BODILY HARM-POSS FRRM-CHLD-FAM 1
A5331 ASLT 5-INFLT BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-ADLT-FAM 1
A5351 ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM 34
A5352 ASLT 5-MS-INFLICT BD HRM-HANDS-ASLT-AC 11
A5353 ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-STR 4
A5354 ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM 27
A5355 ASLT 5-1NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-ACQ 15
A5501 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-NO WEAP-ADLT-FAM 3
A5502 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-NO WEAP-ADLT-ACQ 15
A5552 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-HANDS ETC-ADIT-ACQ 1
1
2
2
A8/'
A9660
Bl134
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 2 0 0 1 1 2 100.0
0 I 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 33 1 20 2 10 32 96.9
0 11 1 7 0 3 10 90.9
0 4 1 2 0 1 3 75.0
8 19 8 4 0 7 11 57.8
1 14 4 0 2 8 10 71.4
0 3 1 1 0 1 2 66.6
3 12 4 1 0 7 8 66.6
0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
Run: 3-Feb-93 15:10 OFF01 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Primary ISN~s on[y: No Enfors Offense Report
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS
Dispositions: A[[
Activity codes: Ali
Officers/Badges: AIl
Grids: AIl
Page
ACT ACTIVITY ..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX-
COOE DESCRIPTION PERCENT
REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED
Bl161 BURG 1-OTC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM ASSAULT
Bl165
81264
B3334
B3364
B3394
83434
BURG 1-OCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM PROPERTY
BURG 1-OCC RES NO FRC-N-UN ~EAP-COM THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-COM THEFT
BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
B3464 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
B3494 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
B3764 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
B3794 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
B3894 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT
B4360 BURG 4-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
B4390 BURG 4-UNOCC RES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
B4430 BURG 4-UNOCC RES NO FRC-D-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
B4490 BURG 4'UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK AQCT
)4760 BURG 4-UNOCC NRES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
)4790 BURG 4-ONOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
14890 BURG 4-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
4930 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-D-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
4960 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-N-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT
4990 BURG 4-AT FRC RES-U-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT
1113 FO~GERY-FE-MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PUB OFF
1 100.0
0 0.0
1 100.0
I 16.6
0 0.0
2 28.5
3 60.0
0 0
0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
33.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
I i I
Run: 3-Feb-93 15:10 OFF01
Primary ISN's only: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
t 'ange each day: 00:00 - 23:59
Dispositions: All
Activity codes: All
Officers/Badges: AIl
Grids: All
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Offense Report
OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS
Page 3
ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL
COOE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING
C1211
C1912
C2111
C3111
C3211
C3212
D3250
D3~
D85ud
DA540
DCSO0
E4700
F1211
FORGERY-FE-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-PERSON
FORGERY-FE-OTHER ACT-CHECK-BUSINESS
FORGERY-GM-MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PERSON
FORGERY-MS-MAKE ALTER DESTROY-CHECK-PERSON
FORGERY-MS-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-PERSON
FORGERY-MS-UTT POSSESS PLACE-CHECK-BUSINESS
DRUGS'SCH 2 NARCOTIC-SELLING-COCAIN'UNK CHAR
DRUGS-SCH 2 NARCOTIC-POSSESS-COCAIN-OTH CHAR
DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSSESSION
DRUGS'SM AMT IN MOT VEH-POSS-MARIJ-UNK
DRUGS-DRUG PARAPH-POSSESS-UNK-UNK
ESC-GM-FLEE AN OFFICER
ARSON 1-UNINHB-NO WEA-SG RESID-$20000 MORE
F2262 ARSON 2-UNINHAB-NO WEA-PUB BLOG-10000-19999
F4005 ARSON 3-MS-UNK COND-OT PROP-S299 LESS
F4075 ARSON 3-MS-UNK COND-OT STRU-$299 LESS
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED
H1034
13060
J2500
J2700
J3
J3500
K4342
MUR 1-UNK ACT-PREMEDITAT-KNIFE-CHLD-FAM
CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
TRAF-ACCID-GM-AGGRAVATEO VIOLATION
ACCIDENT-MS-FAIL STOP-DRVR CAUSED
TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
KDNAP-NO HRM-SAF PLAC-TERROR-OTHR gEA-ADLT-ACQ
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 I 100.0
5 0 5 4 0 0 1 1 20.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
6 0 6 0 4 1 1 6 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0
I 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0
21 10 11 2 0 0 9 9 81.8
9 0 9 0 9 0 0 9 100,0
12 0 12 0 12 0 0 12 100,0
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100,0
42 1 41 0 40 1 0 41 100,0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
Run: 3-Feb-93 15:10 OFF01 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Primary ISN~s on[y: No Enfors Offense Report
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 OFFENSE ACTIVITY DiSPOSiTIONS
Oispositions: At[
Activity codes: Att
Officers/Badges: AIl
Grids: Ali
Page 4
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
COOE DESCRIPTION
REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED
L4041
L4225
L5075
L5115
L5173
L5377
L7051
L7071
.7075
2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
3 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 I 100.0
1 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 1 O 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
K6004 DEPRIVE OF PARENTAL RIGHTS-UNK WEAP-CHLD-FAM
L1021 CSC 1-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNDER 13-F
L1025 CSC 1-UNK ACT-PARENT-16-1?-F
L1071 CSC I~UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-F
L1073 CSC 1-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-13-15-F
L2022 CSC 1 WEAP-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNDER 13-M
L3021 CSC 2-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNDER 13-F
L3029 CSC 2-UNK ACT-PARENT-UNK AGE-F
L3072 CSC 2-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-M
L3832 CSC 2-MULTIPLE ACTS-GUARDIAN-UNDER 13-M
L3841 CSC 2-MULTIPLE ACTS-OTH FAM-UNDER 13-F
L4027 CSC 2 WEAP-FEAR GBH-UNK ACT-PARENT-18 OLDER-F
L4031 CSC 2 WEAP-UNK ACT-GUARDiAN-UNDER 13-F
L4032 CSC 2 ~EAP-UNK ACT-GUARDIAN-UNDER 13-M
CSC 2 ~EAP-UNK ACT-OTH FAM-UNDER 13-F
CSC 2 ~EAP-FEAR GBH-PARENT-16-1?-F
CSC 3-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-16-1?-F
CSC 3-NO FRC-SPOUSE-16-1?-F
CSC 3-NO FRC-ACQUAINT-13-15-F
CSC 3-FRC OR COERCN-ACQUAINT-18 OLDER-F
CSC 4-UNK ACT-POS AUTH-UNDER 13-F
CSC 4-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-F
CSC 4-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-16-1?-F
Run: 3-Feb-93 15:10 OFFO'I
Primary ISN's only: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
T' range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
Dispositions: AL[
Activity codes:
Officers/Badges: AIl
Grids: All
ACT ACTIVITY
COOE DESCRIPTION
L7087 CSC 4'UNK ACT-STRANGER'18 OLDER-F
LAAT7 CSC 5-NO CONSENT CONTACT-ACQUAINT-16 TO 17-F
M2313 OBSTRUCT CORRESPONDENCE (POSTAL)
M3001 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER
M3003 JUVENILE-HABITUAL TRUANT
M4102 LIQUOR - SELLING
M4104
M5313
M5350
M5510
M5539
M6501
M7701
N2230
N3030
N3040
N3060
N3070
N3190
O3600
LIQUOR - POSSESSING
LIQUOR-1NTOX LIQUOR LICENSES-PROHIBITED ACTS
LIQUOR - OTHER
JUVENILE-CURFEW
JUVENILE-RUNAWAY
HEALTH-SAFETY-FOOO-ADULTERATED
HEALTH-SAFETY-HAZ WASTE-INFECTIOUS WASTE
DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION
FALSELY IMPERSONATING ANOTHER
DISTURB PEACE-GM-HARASS-ABUSE-THRT-MAIL-DELIV
DISTURB PEACE-MS-DISORDERLY CONDUCT
DISTURB PEACE-MS-PERMIT PUBLIC NUISANCE
DISTURB PEACE-MS-CONCEALING IDENTITY
DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE
DISTURB PEACE-MS-EMERGENCY TELEPHONE CALLS
DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
OBSENIIY-MS-INDECENT EXPOSURE-UNK AUD
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Offense Report
OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS
Page 5
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 0.0
5 0 5 3 0 0 2 2 40.0
15 0 15 2 0 13 0 13 86.6
4 0 4 0 0 3 1 4 100.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
2 0 2 0 1 0 1 2 100.0
26 0 26 1 24 1 0 25 96.1
13 0 13 0 0 13 0 13 100.0
32 0 32 2 0 18 12 30 93.7
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
7 0 7 0 6 0 1 7 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
5 0 5 1 4 0 0 4 80.0
9 1 8 0 7 0 1 8 100.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100,0
112 3 109 63 23 2 21 46 42.2
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
Run: 3-Feb-93 15:10 OFF01
Primary ]SN's onty: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
Dispositions: Att
Activity codes: At[
Officers/Badges:
Grids: AIl
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Offense Report
OFFENSE ACTIVITY DiSPOSITiONS
Page 6
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
CODE DESCRiPTiON
REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPT]ON TOTAL CLEARED
03772 06SENITY-MS-OBSCENE LETTER ETC-ADULT
03881 06SEN[TY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-MINOR
03882 OBSEN]TY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT
P1110 PROP DAMAGE-FE-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
P2120 PROP DAMAGE-GM-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT
P2130 PROP DAMAGE-GM-BUSINESS-UNK iNTENT
P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
P3120 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PUBLIC-UNK iNTENT
P3130 PROP DAMAGE'MS'BUSINESS-UNK INTENT
P3310 TRESPASS-MS-PRIVATE-UNK iNTENT
P3600 LITTER-UNLAWFUL DEPOSIT OF GARBAGE-MS
Q1221 STLN PROP'FE-POSSESS-VEHICLE-OVER 2500
Q1291 STLN PROP-FE-POSSESS-OTHER PROP-OVER $2500
Q2293 STLN PROP-GM-POSSESS-OTHER PROP-$301-$999
Q2297 STLN PROP-GM-POSSESS-OTH PROP-501-2500
R3152 ROSB'SIMPLE-HIGHWAY-STRONGARM-ADULT-ACQ
T0021 THEFT-UNK LVL VAL-FRM BUiLDiNG-MONEY
T1029 THEFT-MORE $2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP
T2021 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM BUILDiNG-MONEY
T2029 TNEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP
T2049 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM SHIPMENT-OTH PROP
T2059 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP
T2159 THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
2 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 100.0
2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0
7 0 7 6 0 0 1 1 14.2
6 0 6 4 0 0 2 2 33.3
3 0 3 1 2 0 0 2 ~.6
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
~ 0 ~ 69 4 2 11 17 19.7
5 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0
5 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0.0
6 1 5 1 0 0 4 4 80.0
5 0 5 1 0 0 4 4 80.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0,0
2 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
7 0 7 2 3 1 1 5 71.4
15 2 13 7 2 0 4 6 46.1
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 lO0
2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0
7 0 7 5 1 1 0 2 28.5
,; I I i I
Run: 3-Feb-93 15:10 OFF01
Primary ISN's only: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Ti -ange each day: 00:00 - 23:59
Dispositions: All
Activity codes: Alt
Officers/Badges: Att
Grids: All
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Offense Report
OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS
Page
ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL
COOE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING
T2169
T2189
T4021
T4029
T4059
T4069
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-$251-$2500-FE-FRM FISHHOUSE-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-MONEY
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MAIL-OTH PROP
T4099 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP
T4151 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-MONEY
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED
T4t,,
T4169
T4179
T4189
T4999
TB159
TC021
TC029
TC059
TC169
TEO02
TF029
TF~
TF169
TGO02
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM POSTAL-OTH PROP
THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM FISHHOUSE-OTH PROP
THEFT-250 LESS-MS-FRM OTHER-OTH PROP
THEFT-MORE 2500-FE-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-MONEY
THEFT-501-2500-FE-BUILDING-OTH PROP
THEFT-501-2500-FE-YARDS-OTH PROP
THEFT-501-2500-FE-WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-OTHER-FE-UNKNOgN-SERVICES
THEFT-201-5OO-GM-BUILDING-OTH PROP
THEFT-201-5OO-GM-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
THEFT-201-5OO-GM-UATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
THEFT-LESS 200-GM-UNKNOtJN-SERVICES
6 0 6 5 1 0 0 1 16.6
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
4 0 4 1 1 0 2 3 75.0
8 0 8 3 1 2 2 5 62.5
8 0 8 7 0 0 1 1 12.5
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
5 0 5 3 0 0 2 2 40.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
42 2 40 34 1 4 1 6 15.0
7 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
5 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0.0
2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
5 0 5 1 2 2 0 4 80.0
2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
7
Run: 3-Feb-93 15:10 OFF01
Primary ISN's only: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59
Dispositions: ALL
Activity codes: AIl
Officers/Badges: AIl
Grids: At[
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Offense Report
OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS
Page
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
CODE DESCRIPTION
REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED
THEFT-LESS 200-GM-FRM PERSON-OTH PROP
THEFT-LESS 200-GM-BUILDING-MONEY
THEFT-LESS 200'GM-BUILDING-OTH PROP
TG019
TG021
TG029
U3250
U3286
U3288
TG059 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-YARDS-OTH PROP
TG061 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-MAILS-MONEY
TG069 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-MAILS-OTH PROP
TG099 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP
TG159 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP
TN099 THEFT-201-5OO-MS-SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP
U1013 THEFT-FE-BY CHECK-$501-$2500
U1032 THEFT-FE-BY CREDIT CARD-$2501-$19999
UIO3A THEFT'FE-BY-CREDIT-CARD-201-2500
U1513 THEFT-FE-OTHR VEH-NO MOTOR-501-2500
U1994 FRAUD-FE-OTHER ACT-301-500
U2493 THEFT-GM-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-501-2501
U2497 THEFT-GM-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-201-500
U3018 THEFT-MS-BY CHECK-200 OR LESS
U3026 THEFT-MS-ISSUE 140RTHLES CHECK-S250 LESS
U3028 THEFt-MS-ISSUE I~ORTHLESS CHECK-200 OR LESS
U3036 THEFT-MS-BY CREDIT CARD-S250 LESS
FRAUD-MS-FRAUDULENT STATEMENT
THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-S250 LESS
THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-200 OR LESS
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
3 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 33.3
5 0 5 4 1 0 0 1 20.0
8 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
10 1 9 7 1 1 0 2 2?
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
13 1 12 0 5 0 ? 12 100.0
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
7 0 ? 1 3 0 3 6 85.7
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
19 0 19 1 2 13 3 18 94.7
Run: 3-Feb-93 15:10 OFF01
Primary ISN's only: No
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Ti- ~ange each day: 00:00 - 23:59
Dispositions: All
Activity cedes: Att
Officers/Badges: All
Grids: Att
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Enfors Offense Report
OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS
Page 9
ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL
COOE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING
U3289
U3497
U3498
U3499
U3998
V1021
THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING-35000-OR MORE
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-201-500
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR-200 OR LESS
THEFT-MS-BICYCLE-NO-MOTOR-35000-OR-MORE
FRAUD-MS-OTHER ACT-200 OR LESS
VEH THEFT-FE-OVER $2500-AUTO
V1022 VEH THEFT-FE-OVER $2500-TRUCK-BUS
VlO~ VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-SNC~OBILE
Vl~ VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-ATV
V2021 VEH THEFT-FE-$251-$2500-AUTO
V2022 VEH THEFT-FE-$251-$2500-TRUCK-BUS
V2023 VEH THEFT-FE-251-2500-MOTORCYCLE
V2024 VEH THEFT-FE-251-2500-SNOgMOBILE
V2029 VEH THEFT-FE-251-2500-BOAT-MOTORIZED
VA021 VEH-MORE THAN 2500-FE-THEFT-AUTO
VA024 VEH-MORE THAN 2500-FE-THEFT-SNOI4MOBILE
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED
VA029
143180
143190
143599
143980
X3080
VEH-MORE THAN 2500-FE-THEFT-BOAT-MTRI
14EAPONS-MS-DISCHARGE-FIRENORKS-NO CHAR
14EAPONS-MS'USES'OTHER TYPE'NO CHAR
14EAPONS'MS'CARRY TRANS'OTHER'UNLA14 PURPOS
gEAPONS-MS'POSSESS'OTHER TYPE-NO CHAR
14EAPONS'MS'OTHER ACT-FIRE140RKS'NO CHAR
CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
2 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 50.0
17 2 15 13 1 0 1 2 13.3
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
3 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 50.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 100.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
2 0 2 1 0 0 1 I 50.0
3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0.0
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0
3 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 100.0
3 0 3 1 1 0 1 2 ~.6
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0
5 0 5 1 3 0 1 4 80.0
4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0
Run: 3-Feb-93 15:10 OFF01 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Primary ISN~s on[y: No Enfors Offense Report
Date Reported range: 01/01/92 - 12/31/92
Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS
Oispositions: Alt
Activity codes: AIl
Officers/Badges: Att
Grids: At[
Page 10
ACT ACTIV]TY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL
COOE DESCR]PT]ON
........ REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPT]ON
X3190 CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-FALSELY REPORT CRIME 3 0 3 0 2 1 0
Y3230 CRIM AGNST GOVN-MS-ESCAPE TAX-HTR VEH 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
..... OFFENSES CLEARED ....
ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT
TOTAL CLEAREO
3 100.0
1 100.0
**** Report Totals:
996 58 938 423 247 96 172 515 54.9
IX.
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (CIVIL DEFENSE)
The Emergency Preparedness budget again came in
under original projections. Doradus Corporation now
holds the maintenance agreement and our siren costs
were the main reason for the savings.
Hazardous materials continues to be a major concern
for Emergency Preparedness. The City receives
approximately $4,000 from FEMA (Federal Emergency
Management Ass'n.) in the form of a grant. We spent
$2,098.45 for emergency preparedness in addition to
salaries that are accounted for in the police
budget.
Xe
Southwest Metro Drug Task Force
Attached is the annual report of the drug task force
in which we are a member. We currently have Sgt.
Hudson assigned and received reimbursement for their
salaries through a federal grant from the Office of
Drug Policy. I believe the task force is doing an
excellent job and deserves our continued support.
The major drugs of use in our area continues to be
cocaine, marijuana, and LSD.
73,,%.
! ! I
SOUTHWEST METRO DRUG TASK FORCE
1992 ANNUAL REPORT
Law Enforcement Aqencies involved in the Task Force:
South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety
St Boni/Minnetrista Public Safety
Car,,er County Sheriffs Department
Mcleod County Sheriffs Department
Scott County Sheriffs Department
Prior Lake Police Department
Shakopee Police Department
Chanhassen Public Safety
Chaska Police Department
Mound Police Department
Agencies with officers assigned to the Task Force:
The Coordinators assignment to the Task Force is reviewed
on a annual basis by Task Force Committee.
Agents are assigned to the Task Force for two years.
The Coordinator for the Task Force is from the Mound
Police Department. Agents assigned to the Task Force are
from the Carver County Sheriffs Department, Chaska Police
Department, and the Shakopee Police Department.
Chief Greg $chol from the Chaska Police Department was the
Executive Director for the Task Force for 1992.
The Task Force was housed at the Chaska Police Department.
Financial Report for 1992:
Federal Grant award
Cash Match made by agencies
Total Income for Task Force
Total Expenditures for Task Force
Savings Account balance
(see attached comprehensive
$160,000.00
$ 84,000.00
$258,849.46
$237,925.13
$ 7,654.62
financial report)
Task Force Objective:
The objective of the Task Force for 1992, as stated in the
federal grant, was to conduct investigations into the
selling, buying, and manufacturing of controlled
substances by "street level people", in the Task Force
service area.
"Street Level" as defined in the federal grant are people
buying or selling the following quantities of controlled
substances:
Marijuana 1/8 oz to 1 lb
Cocaine 1 gram to 1 ounce
LSD 1 to 500 dosage units
Investigations are also conducted involving
controlled substances that are not mentioned above.
other
Investigatiens that involve " mid and upper level"
persons, are referred to agencies that have the staffing
and financi~! support to conduct those investigations.
The Task Force does assist in those investigations when
possible.
One thin~ that is very apparent in conducting
investigations, is "networking". Networking is where
people who are selling, buying, and using controlled
substances, do not stay just in the community where they
live, but move about frequently in order to conduct their
business.
Through investigations conducted by the Task Force, it is
very common to see people going into Minneapolis for
example, and buying quantities of drugs, and then bring
them back iuto the service area where they are then broken
down and sold. An arrest of a dealer in one part of the
service area can have an effect on the drugs being sold or
used in another part of the service area, even though the
arrest of the person/persons does not take place were they
live.
Activity Report:
Number of Cases developed 126
Persons Charged 91
Search Warrant executed 39
Number of cases charged in counties
Hennepin
Carver
Mcleod
Dakota
Anoka
Scott
41
31
8
3
3
41
68% of all cases involved the sale of
substance.
$12,465.00 was spent on the purchasing
substances.
$2,107.00 was spent on information
a controlled
of controlled
Controlled substance involved
Marijuana 77 cases
Coca!ne 28 cases
LSD 7 cases
Mushrooms 3 cases
Valium 3 cases
Heroin 1 case
Methamphetamine 2 cases
Other Scheduled 5 cases
Forfeited/Seized Property
Currency
Vehicles
Jewelry
Real Estate
Weapons
short
long
$ 18,177.39
13
11
3 homes
1 farm
12
23
C- rD 0 0
n
i'D
<
0
0
CI-
e-)
0
,.-4.
C-)
Cb
L,q
U]
'237
Special cases for 1992=
******
One of the largest outdoor growing operations of marijuana
in Minnesot~ wa.~ seized in Carver County, Camden Township.
As a result of this investigation, 1,716 mature marijuana
plants were seized along with approximately 60 pounds of
processed marijuana. The owner of the farm was arrested
and convicted in federal court with manufacturing a
controlled substance in excess of 1000 ~lants. The owner
faces a minimum of 10 years no parole in federal prison.
The farm was also seized. The owner of the farm lived in
Wayzata and had bought the farm 4 years ago. This arrest
and seizure will have a direct effect on the amount of
marijuana going on the streets in the Task Force service
area.
******
In Watertown, a very sophisticated hydroponic marijuana
growing operation was seized. 159 plants were seized and
5 persons arrested. This operation involved the female
plants be raised and cloned. The clones would be taken
and raised hs, droponically , then planted and taken to
another location where they were further tended until
beig~ harvested. This produces a very high grade of
marl3uana that is very much in demand. In the process of
dismantling the grow operation, the Task Force encountered
people coming from St Bonifacious, Mound and the Watertown
area to buy the marijuana that was being grown.
One of the locations that the plants were taken to was
located and two people arrested with 50 plants. The Task
Force learned that There was some 30 different locations
were plants were being taken all over the metropolitan
area.
The main operator who was on probation out of state for a
narcotic violation was convicted in state court along with
four of his accomplices.
Two 19 year old males were arrested by the Task Force for
selling marijuana and mushrooms in the Chaska, Chanhassen,
Eden Prairie and Minneapolis area. Both males had prior
convictions for sale of controlled substances in Hennepin
and Dakota county. One of the males had killed a person
while high on LSD as a young juvenile. Both were dealing
heavil~ in marijuana and mushrooms with their main source
being ~n MSnneapolis. The source was also arrested.
I ! I
Two females and a male were arrested in Mound for dealing
crack and cocaine. The male who was the source, was from
St Paul, and brought the cocaine out to Mound, where it
was cooked up into cocaine and sold to people in the
Mound, St B~,nifacinus, Minnetrista, Excelsior and
Chanhassen area. One of the females was employed as a
lunch monitor in a local school. The source had prior
convictions for cocaine, and was awaiting trail on charges
of selling cocaine in Ramsey County at the time the Task
Force arrested him. All three were convicted and are
currently i~ prison at i~his time.
As a result of this case, another Minnetrista couple was
arrested who were buying cocaine from the 3 people in
Mound and selling it to other people in the Minnctrista
Mound area.
In Minneapolis, two men were arrested for growing
marijuana. This case came about as a result of a person
being arrested for dealing marijuana in the Chanhassen,
Eden Prairie area. The source for the marijuana was the
two men growing it in Minneapolis. The two men were
arrested and convicted , and the growing operation seized
along with the house which had been altered to accommodate
the growing operation.
A 19 year old male from Mound, was arrested and convicted
for selling marijuana and buying LSD. This male was
dealing approximately a 1/4 pound of marijuana a day that
was being brought in from Minneapolis, to Moun~, to be
sold. The male was selling the marijuana in Mound,
Minnetrista, Chanhassen and Excelsior. The male was
finally arrested when he purchased LSD from a Task Force
agent. The LSD was bought in a large quantity and was
going to be resold. The male was convicted and faces 48
months in prison.
A 25 year old female who lived in Shakopee was arrested
for selling cocaine and crack. This female was taking a
number of people from the Shakopee and Chaska area into
Minneapolis where she would ~t them the crack and
cocaine. Female said that she d it to supply her demand
for the cra.:k.
Two males in their 40's and a female in her 30's were
arrested for selling cocaine and marijuana. One of the
males was from Buffalo Lake, and the other male and female
couple were from Minneapolis. The couple was the source
for cocaine from the cities to the Chaska, Chanhassen,
Shakopee area, along with being the source for marijuana
in the St Bonifacious and Buffalo Lake area. All three
are pending trial at this time.
A male was arrested in Shakopee for manufacturing
marijuana.' A search warrant revealed that the basement of
the residence had been altered to accommodate the growing
operation. Over 100 plants were seized. This operation
had apparently been in operation for a couple of years.
Due to the weapons found at the residence and the number
of plants this case is being charged federally.
Two brothers were ~arged. and convicted for manufacturing
and possession marijuana ~n Prior Lake. Another person in
the house was also cha~g~d with possession of cocaine.
Due to the amount of marijuana the house was also seized.
These people were one of the main sources for marijuana in
the Prior Lake and Shakopee area.
CITY of MOUND
February 18, 1993
Honorable Mayor, City Council and City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT:
1992 ANNUAL REPORT
PLANNING AND INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Dear Mayor, Council and City Manager:
It is with great pleasure I present to you this Annual Report of the Planning & Inspections
Department.
It is our hope that this report will supply City Management with enough data to study and
then decide and direct this department in its course of action in the coming years.
We welcome any comments, suggestions or questions you may have.
Jon Sutherland
Building Official
JS:pj
r)tinted on recycled
7't/
PLANNING AND INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
1992 ANNUAL REPORT
CONTENTS
. Paqe
ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE OF DEPARTMENT
PERSONNEL .........
........ 1 - 3
COORDINATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS
............. 3 - 4
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
......... 5 - 6
PLANNING & ZONING .........
............ 6 - 10
REVENUE/EXPENDITURES ........
............. 10
COMPLAINTS .......................
10 - 11
EDUCATION AND TRAINING
.................... 11
SUMMARY ............
.............. 11 - 12
ANNUAL BUILDING PERMIT COUNT . . .
........... Exhibit A
BREAKDOWN OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
........... Exhibit B
TOTAL YEARLY VALUES OF NEW CONSTRUCTION ......... Exhibit C
NEW HOUSING UNITS (1974 - 1992) ............. Exhibit D
DODGE HOUSING ACTIVITY UPDATE ......
........ Exhibit E
BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT, DECEMBER 1993
......... Exhibit F
PLANNING & ZONING CASES (1988 - 1992) .......... Exhibit G
! i I
ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE OF PLANNING ~ND INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT:.
This department is established as an official part of city
government. Its purpose is to assist the general public and enforce
the provisions of the Mound City Code, Zoning Ordinance, State
Building Code, and related state statutes and regulations.
~. To Prepare for the Future. For the development and
implementation of the comprehensive plan to guide the physical
development of the municipality to maintain and enhance the city as
a good place to live, work, play and grow.
To assist in the evolution of regulations at the local, state,
and federal level to insure they are just and fulfill the intent of
protection of life safety, health and welfare.
Building Inspections. To Regulate and Maintain in a Safe
Condition. To provide minimum standards to safeguard life and limb,
health, property and public welfare by regulating and controlling the
design, construction, quality of materials used and occupancy,
location, and maintenance of all structures within this jurisdiction.
~. Authority is established by the city Code. Its duty
is to serve the public by careful application and enforcement of the
regulations adopted by the city. With the guidance of the planning
commission and city council and under the direction of the city
Manager.
PERSONNEL - PLANNING ]tND INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT:
The Planning and Inspections Department has two full time
employees, a Building official and a Secretary, who is also shared
with the Parks Department. June Hyland of the Police Department also
works part time on city Code Enforcement.
Buildinq official, Jon Sutherland.
EDUCATION:
o University of Minnesota, Minneapolis/St. Paul 1974 - 1976
o Union Carpentry Apprenticeship Program 1978 - 1984.
o North Hennepin Community College, Building Inspections -
Technology, 1985 to Present.
PRIOR EXPERIENCE:
7/90 - Present
6/88 - 7~90
7~87 - 6~88
city of Mound, Building official
Isanti County, Building official
city of Prior Lake/Savage/Scott
Building Inspector
County,
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
4/87 - 7-87 City of White Bear Lake, Internship -
Building Inspector
4/86 - 4/87 Derrick Land Co., Site Manager
1978 - 1986 Varied construction experience, including
union carpentry apprenticeship, two years
electrical, and site management.
CERTIFICATIONS/MEMBERSHiPS:
o
o
o
o
o
o
Member International Conference of Building Officials
(ICBO)
Certified Class II Building Official, State of Minnesota
Certified on Site Sewage Treatment Systems MPCA
Member North Star Chapter ICBO
Member Lake Country Chapter ICBO
Member International Conference Plumbing & Mechanical
Officials, both International and Local Chapters
Member Minnesota Association of Housing Code Officials
(MAHCO)
DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES:
o
o
o
Complete administration of Planning & Inspections
Department assisting general public and contractors in
application and interpretation of building codes and
ordinances
Working in conjunction with the consultant city planner on
the majority of planning and zoning related issues.
Conduct all plan review permit issuance and related
inspections.
Responsible for enforcement of codes, laws, and ordinances
that establish basic and uniform performance standards that
safeguard life safety, welfare, comfort, and security of
the residents of this municipality.
Prepares and executes department budget.
Secretary, Pegg~ Jamez. Peggy has a myriad of duties from
accepting and reviewing applications for all types of permits, zoning
requests, assisting in preparing packets for Planning Commission and
Park Commission meetings, including writing proposed resolutions for
the City Council from the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
Peggy acts as a bridge to all other related departments, (i.e.
Planning, Engineering, Streets, Sewer and Water, Parks) disseminating
the required information to each. This requires working knowledge of
each department and how its regulations affect the customer or
applicant.
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
Some of Peggy's accomplishments during the year of 1992 are as
follows:
O
O
O
Proficiently assisted all parties with the multitude of
zoning applications throughout the year.
Proficiently assisted the general public and contractors
with applications and interpretation of the zoning code
with respect to lots or parcels being buildable and general
zoning information.
Managed all processes in the registration requirements for
plumbing and mechanical contractors in the city.
Updated all related forms, applications and
handouts to ease the application process and
provide readily accessible information to our
customers.
O
Continued reorganization of policy and procedure
manual.
Assisted in review of zoning code modifications
and the pending shoreland management ordinance
and city codes and regulations on public lands.
O
Continued working with the Adopt a Green Space
program.
Peggy is a definite asset to this department. She works
independently and directly with other city departments on interrelated
issues with minimal supervision.
COORDINATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS:
Public Utilities/Streets. This department works closely with
Greg Skinner and city Engineer John Cameron on all new construction
and related work. Greg and his staff inspect all water and sewer
hookups from the foundation out. We now send a majority of the
building permit applications and zoning cases to Greg for his review
and approval, this insures less problems down the line relating to
encroachments on city property and utility and drainage easements.
We will both continue our efforts to keep our streets free from
erosion.
Parks Department. The Park Director, Jim Fackler, and I have
continued working together this year on commons related issues. After
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
the fact Construction on Public Lands Permit cases have progressed
through the lengthy court system process with the expected result and
long term goal to remove structures from public lands. Secretary,
Peggy James worked approximately 400 hours this last year for the
Parks Department (does not include Park Commission meeting time), processing
public lands permits, preparing agendas, packets, and writing minutes
for the Park Commission, typing correspondence and month end reports,
updating dock forms, and other miscellaneous duties as instructed by
the Park Director.
Additional Staff. Gayle, Dee, Joyce and Linda all assist the
Planning and Inspections Department. We could absolutely not get
along without their help and are grateful for the team effort to serve
the public. In addition to full time staff, the following personnel
assist our department:
gonsultants.
City Planner
City Engineer
Part Time.
Mark Koegler,
Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc.
John Cameron,
McCombs Frank Roos & Assoc.
Building Inspections
Plumbing Inspector
Electrical Inspector
Support Staff
Fire Department.
Loren Kohnen,
Metro West Inspection Services
John Breitner
Jerry Kurth
A1 Tollakson,
State Board of Electricity
June Hyland, Code Enforcement
Police Department
(complaints, derelict auto-
mobiles, and ordinance
violations)
Fire Chief
Asst. Fire Chief
Fire Marshal
Asst. Fire Marshal
Secretary
Don Bryce
Steve Erickson
Mike Palm
Jerry Babb
Judy Bryce
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY:
Construction activity is measured by the building permit value
as determined by the Building official when permits are issued. 441
permits were issued this year with a total value of $4,902,210, this
has been our biggest year since 1988. Permit activity consisted of
8 single family dwelling demolitions, 27 new single family dwellings,
residential and commercial remodeling, reroofing, and mechanical
systems. Some of the highlights are detailed in the following
breakdown. Note Exhibits A, B, and C.
Residential. The bulk of permit activity this year has been 27
new single family dwellings. The quality has been good with the
lakeshore properties consistently having a higher valuation that non-
lakeshore properties. Lakeshore homes typically valued just over
$118,000 with non-lakeshore at $93,000+. A new home is now being
construction on the last available lot in the Lost Lake Subdivision,
this neighborhood has turned out to be a very nice development. Also,
Langdon View is nearly filled with new homes. Please take a drive
through both developments and give me any comments you may have. Note
Exhibits B, D, an E.
Commercial. Commercial work was generally slow this year and
continues a downward trend in activity since 1989. The majority of
commercial work resulted in reroofing projects at Seahorse, the Balboa
building, and the fire station. GTE had a major interior remodeling
project, as did the Netka building, Toro Company, the Legion Club, and
Grandview Middle School. Shirley Hills Elementary had some fire
sprinkler system work. One new commercial/industrial building was
constructed by Toro with its heater test facility located at the rear
of the Balboa property. The future looks bright with all the work
being done by the Mound Visions team with the Request for Proposals
and we are anxious to see more extensive commercial redevelopment.
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
_Buildinq Permit Activity Breakdown.
8
27
7
21
274
97
27
~41
Demolitions of Single Family Dwellings
New Single Family Dwellings
Demolitions of Accessory Buildings
New Accessory Buildings
Additions, Miscellaneous Alterations, and Decks
Signs, Fences, Grading and other miscellaneous
Non-Residential (Commercial, Industrial, etc)
TOTAL BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IN 1991 (see Exhibit F)
PLANNING & ZONING:
Planning and Zoning requests were up again for the third year in
a row, 74 total cases this year results in a 19 percent increase from
1992. 57 of the 74 cases were variance requests with 51 variances
being approved. Our one PDA, Teal Pointe, with nine proposed lots in
the Whipple Addition is ongoing with the preliminary plat being
approved with conditions.
Conditional Use Permit approvals consisted of the teen club at
2313 Commerce Blvd., the new heater test facility at Toro Company,
Headliners Bar and Grill at 5241 Shoreline Drive, a new business for
P. Heck Designs at 5571 Lynwood Blvd., and an Operations Permit for
Drop Ship Express at the Balboa building. The balance of the Planning
and Zoning actions consisted of five minor subdivisions, and four
requests for street vacations. Note yearly charts and Exhibit G.
Zoning Code Modifications. In my 1991 Annual Report I noted that
the proposed zoning code modifications would soon be scheduled for
final public hearing. Numerous public hearings were held over this
period, but the modifications have not yet been adopted. The process
has been extended due in part to the complexity of issues, the
necessary coordination with the DNR mandated Shoreland Management
Ordinance and the Council wishing to give the public every opportunity
to comment. The proposed changes amount to comprehensive changes in
the code. The amendments include housekeeping changes, regulatory
changes pertaining to accessory buildings, acceptable building
materials, setbacks to the lakeshore, and other issues.
Lot sizes of new subdivisions will remain at 6,000 and 10,000
square feet and it was decided that if there are parcels in the city
,I, & I
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
that are considered, improperly zoned, they should be looked at and
possibly rezoned. Our consultant, Mark Koegler, has provided the full
range of services for these modifications, the Planner was also
involved with 64 of the 74 cases involving variances, conditional use
permits, and subdivision.
Shoreland Manaqement. The State of Minnesota initially adopted
statewide shoreland management rules in the 1970's. These rules
mandated by the Stated required Mound to develop regulations. The
policy was established to promote full use and enjoyment of waters of
the State, to promote safety for persons and property in connection
with such use, and to promote uniformity of laws relating to such use.
The Lake Minnetonka communities met over time with the DNR and because
of their unique circumstances developed a separate set of rules for
each community around the lake. Several communities have now adopted
their ordinances and Mound is to formally adopt ours very soon.
Our regulations are comprehensive and apply to all properties
within 1,000 feet of the lake. They are interrelated with the zoning
code and were incorporated into it. This necessitated the services
of the Planner, staff, the Planning Commission and City Council who
have put a considerable amount of time and effort into the development
of this new ordinance.
Floodplain. Another ordinance assembled in response to federally
mandated legislation. The ordinance was drafted during the course of
1992 with the direction of our City Planner, Mark Koegler. It has
been reviewed by the Planning Commission and submitted to the DNR who
has provisionally accepted it. Action in 1993 will be for the
Planning Commission to have its public hearing, pass it onto the City
Council for public hearings, review, and approval, and then to
resubmit to the DNR for final approval.
Truth in Housinq. The City Council directed the Planning
Commission to prepare a Truth in Housing Ordinance to inform
prospective purchasers of residential real estate. It was decided to
model the ordinance on the existing Minneapolis ordinance that has
been in effect for approximately 18 years. It was given to a
subcommittee level for detailed review and is now back at the Planning
Commission and being considered further. A draft will be forwarded
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
to the City Council as soon as possible.
The ordinance is proposed to be a buyer beware tool, is not
intended to require any modifications, and it includes miscellaneous
zoning information about the property.
~ental Regulations. The proposed rental ordinance regulations
are currently at a subcommittee level to allow a review and comment
period of just the regulations, proposed Section 319:00. The
licensing and fees sections are no longer being considered at this
time. It is the intent of the committee to submit its comments back
to the Council sometime in June 1993.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION BOARD OF APPEALS
1992 APPROVED DENIED W/DRAWN TABLED TOTAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 5 5
PDA's 1 1
PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLATS 2 2
SUBDIVISIONS, MINOR 4 1 5
VACATION OF 3
STREETS/EASEMENTS 4
VARIANCES 51 3 3 57
TOTAL 66 5 3 0 74
1991 APPROVED DENIED W/DRAWN TABLED TOTAL
..CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 6 6
SITE PLAN REVIEWS i 1
SUBDIVISIONS, MINOR 4 5
ZONING AMENDMENTS 1 1
VACATION OF 1
_STREETS/EASEMENTS 1
HOUSE MOVINGS 1 1
VARIANCES 42 2 1 44
TOTAL 55 3 0 ! 59
I ! I
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
1990 APPROVED DENIED W/DRAWN TABLED TOTAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 4 4
PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLATS 1 1
SUBDIVISIONS, MINOR 4 4
VACATION OF 0
STREETS/EASEMENTS
ZONING AMENDMENTS 2 2
RESOLUTION AMENDMENTS 2 1 3
VARIANCES 22 5 2 0 29
I'OTAI, 35 6 2 0 4,3
1989 APPROVED DENIED W/DRAWN TABLED TOTAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 6 1 7
PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLATS 3 3
SUBDIVISIONS, MINOR 6 1 i 8
VACATION OF 1 1
STREETS/EASEMENTS
ZONING AMENDMENTS 1 1 2
HOUSE MOVINGS 2 2
VARIANCES 19 6 1 26
TOTAL 38 7 I 3 49
1988 APPROVED D .NI .D W/D WN TABLED TOTAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 5 5
PRELIMINARY/FINAL PLATS
SUBDIVISIONS, MINOR 7 7
VACATION OF 5 5
STREETS/EASEMENTS
ZONING AMENDMENTS 3 3
WETLAND 1
GRADING 1 1
VARIANCES 14 3 1 18
~)TAL 35 4 0 I 40
9
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
The City Council's actions were in agreement with the Planning
Commission,s recommendations, with some amendments at the council
level, as follows:
1992 = 96%
1991 = 98%
1990 = 100%
1989 = 92%
1988 = 95%
REVENUE & EXPENDITURES:
Below is a summary of budget and revenue for construction
activity:
1990 1990 1991 1991 1992 1992 1993
BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL PROPOSED
REVENUE 86,700 68,670 65,700 68,041 65,100 82,314 73,050
EXPENDITURF~ 145,000 133,118 123,230 124,778 127,000 153,683 138,440
COMPLAINTS:
Following is a brief recap on the number of complaints received
resulting in violations of the Zoning Code, Garbage Collection
Practices, and Nuisance Ordinance:
1989 ........ 108
1990 ........ 101
1991 ........ 80
1992 ........ 77
Not included in these figures are complaints related to
violations of the sign ordinance, building code, or issues addressed
independently by staff or miscellaneous complaints handled by the
Police Department.
Our record keeping of complaints has improved. We are updating
our records as complaints come in. The Department's goals for 1993
are as follows:
o Revise and continue to develop procedures for effective
nuisance abatement consistent with community spirit.
o Improve record keeping and tracking of complaints and
problem areas to provide for improved compliance.
754
I ! I
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
Improve public awareness of zoning codes and ordinances.
Improve staff's response to complaints.
EDUCATION AND TRAINING:
Every municipality within the State of Minnesota over a certain
population is required by state statutes to adopt the State Building
Code in it entirety and appoint a qualified Building Official who is
tested and certified by the Department of Administration Building
Codes and Standards Division.
Each Building Official must satisfactorily complete applicable
educational programs established or approved by the Commissioner of
the Department of Labor and Industry.
Continuing Education is imperative to maintain certification and
to stay abreast of the every changing codes and new methods of
construction.
Some of my educational opportunities in 1992 were:
o ICBO Annual Building Officials Code Change
Meeting August 31st through September 4th.
o 35th Annual Institute for Building Officials,
University of Minnesota Earl Brown Institute
o North Star/ICBO Chapter regular meetings.
o I plan to continue work on my associates degree
in Building Inspection Technology at North
Hennepin Community College in the evening.
Secretary, Peggy James, attended a S.A.C. Workshop presented by
the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. The payback of the
workshop is that the City will now take advantage of some S.A.C.
credits that could have been lost forever.
SUMMARY:
So much has happened in the City in the last year, yet it seems
as if it has passed by in an instant. We are a young department, yet
we are a year older, we have successfully traversed the highs and lows
of the past year and are so much the wiser. We are more mature and
skilled to deal with the challenges ahead. This experience we have
gained will be tested, the mandates and adoptions of the newly
11
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
proposed ordinances are expected to heighten the work load and we will
endeavor to continue and improve our efficiency and service to the
public.
I am delighted to be surrounded by such excellent staff within
my department and other departments of the City. We look forward to
another exciting and challenging year.
12
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
Exhibit A
ANNUAL BUILDING PERMIT COUNT
1968 ............. 127
1969 ............. 221
1970 · · · ... ........ 277
1971 ............. 328
1972 ............. 371
1973 ............. 285
1974 ......... ' .... 321
1975 ............. 326
1976 ............. 352
1977 ............. 405
1978 ............. 347
1979 ............. 330
1980 ............. 254
1981 ............. 285
1982 ............. 296
1983 ............. 307
1984 ............. 323
1985 ............. 318
1986 ............. 358
1987 ............. 429
1988 ............. 402
1989 ............. 375
1990 ............. 362
1991. · ............ 397
1992 ............. 441
NOTE: Total number of.'permits includes all building permits issued
for new s~ructures~ additions, decks, miscellaneous remodel, signs,
fences, demolitions, etc.
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Re~ort
Exhibit B
~ J I, ! I
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
Exhibit C
TOTAL YEARLY VALUES OF NEW CONSTRUCTION
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
YEAR & YEARLY VALUE IN THOUSANDS $
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
Exhibit D
NEW HOUSING UNITS
Z
20-
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92
YEAR
I I I
ARgAS
Planning & Inspeci£'ons-
m nl'W
Update
RECEIVE
E ibit E
SAf~ STATES AVELAGI AVEUCl
ROUSES. COST (ti SO. ~.
b,960 ~h~l~ 126,800 1,78~
1, ~66 ~l~ 10l, 600 I, ~68
8,831 ~Si~S~S 132,500 1,732
'1,616 ~ ~SHI~ llO,~O0 I,Z3S
1,852"., ~ODE IS~- 10~,200 I,~92
552 ~ 126,000 1,837
PER
71.08
75.50
63.63
59.82
$8.59
10,801
15,689
20,921
21,259
21,080
ll,0q9
103,?00 1,810
llg,q00 1,729
108,200 1,82q
(ALEA$ I & 2) llq,800
1,780
ILLINOIS 12
IB~IAAi 109,600 1,668
HICHIGJJI 102,100 1,779
OHIO ! 25,900 1,852
~lS~RSll 100,100 1,800
113,000 1,890
. 11~800 1 ,~-7~6 ~
92,500 ~---1-~03
89,000 1,6q8
102,700 1,683
85,~00 1,878
52.29
69.06
59.32
65.71
57.39
67.98
55.61
59.79
5q.32
5q.O0
61.02
qS.q2
II'EST llS,qO] (&lEAl 3 & 4) 111,600
I'lVl 3,580
68,902
20,66q
31,qlq
1~o, OOq
27,26q
1~079
!,7q9
DELAW&U 76,500 1,797
D.C. lq8,900 2oq51
FLORIDA 92,100 1,85~
GEORGIA 89,500 1,718
KARTLANO 97,300
IIORTN CAIOLINA 89,800
SOUTH C&ROLIHA 9 q, 800
VINGINIA 9 i, 200
brlsT VIRGINIA 91,100
63.19
q2.57
60.75
q9.81
52.10
!,786
!,761
!,129
1,727
1,770
SIX 7,367 iLARAJ'IA 90, q00 1,8q8
8, 27~ 1:2:a~CL'T 96,800 1,7lq
3,301 NISSISSI~I 72,300 1,77q
16,97~ ~$S~ 92,300 l, 721
5q.q8
50.99
52.81
SI .~7
Lei .92
56.~8
q0.76
53
P.S. Many cooperatOrs hav'e asked us why we request both
the construction cost of buildings shown on permit records
as well as estimates of the actual cost. The reason is that
costs listed on permit records frequently tend to be too low
and taus are not realistic. In such cases, we sollctt your
estimates to obtain more accurate costs. ~e greatly appre-
ciate your attention and cooperation. '
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annu~ ~e~o~0
~34~ MoywoocI
NOund, I~ §§564
BUILDING AGTIVITY REPORT
~o~ DECi~BER rY 1992
Exhibit F
?otll Filmily U~t8
&
424,240
2,TaO,3&l
CONVE R,SION$
TOleI CQ~v~r 810~l
106 352
3,100
.533,692
1,841,612
4,902,210
I, i I
Planning & Inspections Department
1992 Annual Report
Exhibit G
CITY OF MOUND
PLANNING & ZONING CASES
70
50-
20
10
0
1988
I I I
1989 1990 1991
YEAR
1992
CITY of MOUND
5341 MAYVvC
MOUND MINNE'~C-c tS),~-
FAX ~612
January 26, 1993
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER
CITY CLERK
1992 ANNUAL REPORT
Personnel Roster:
Francene C. Clark/Leisinger, City Clerk - 8-10-81
Linda Strong, Secretary/Receptionist - 8-5-85
Linda and I report directly to the City Manager. The City Manager
and I share Linda's time. She is the receptionist first. Ed has
her doing secretarial duties and I have her helping me in various
areas. Linda has taken the Minnesota Clerks' Institute program.
This is a 100 hour course put on by the University of Minnesota
Continuing Education and she received her certificate in July,
1989.
RECORDING OF COUNCIL PROCEEDING8
There were 23 regular City Council Meetings in 1992. In addition
there were 2 special Council Meetings, 1 Election Canvassing
Meeting, the Local Board of Review and Budget Hearing. That totals
28 meetings. From these meetings 259 pages of minutes were
generated for Council review and approval. Agendas are prepared by
the City Manager. I then input the Agenda into the computer. The
Agenda material is then put in order, attached, and numbered.
Linda then runs the packets on the Xerox and directs the packets to
the proper people. We send agendas to all people who have items on
the agenda, highlighting the item pertaining to them.
printed on recycled paper
I i I
After the Council Meetings there are items that need to be followed
up, such as contracts signed and sent to the proper people,
directives from the council that need to be attended to and routine
items that need to be resolved. These items many times are 4 to 6
hours of work after a meeting. That does not include preparation
of the minutes and the resolutions.
I did not have time in 1992 to micro-film the Council packets.
This is handy when used in conjunction with the Clerk's Index
Program. I have all of 1989, 1990 and 1991 on the computer. This
has eliminated the need to index all the City Council actions on 3
x 5 cards manually.
MAINTENANCE OF ORDINANCE BOOK
An ordinance is a law of local application, enacted by the City
Council, which prescribes a general and permanent rule for persons
or things within the City. This is distinguished from other types
of regulations or actions which are undertaken by resolution or
motion. Resolutions or motions generally regulate administrative
or temporary actions as opposed to a permanent law.
An ordinance becomes effective upon its adoption by the City
Council and publication in the official newspaper. Therefore, as
soon after a Council meeting as possible, ordinances are published.
After publishing, the new ordinance has to be integrated into the
ordinance book in the correct area.
There were 6 ordinances adopted in 1992.
55-1992 An Ordinance Amending the Mound City Code by
Amending Section 920:15 Regulating Noise in
Residential Areas.
56-1992
57-1992
An Ordinance Amedning Section 800:10, Subd. 6 & 7;
Section 800:25; Section 810:10, Subd. 2, (c);
Section 810:25; and Repealing Section 810:30, Subd.
4 of the City Code Relating to Liquor Licensing.
An Ordinance Amending Section 619:60 of the City
Code Relating to Terminating Water Service.
58-1992
An Ordinance Amending Section 235:27, Subd. 3 of
the City Code Relating to Burning Restrictions -
Burning Permits Required.
59-1992
An Ordinance Amending Section 370:15; Section
600:85; Section 610:70; and Section 540:00, Subds.
19, 20 & 21 Relating to Certification Fees.
60-1992
An Ordinance Amending Section 437:10 of the City
Code by Adding Subd. 5 and Amending Section 437:05,
Subd. 2 by Adding Subsection f. Relating to Removal
of Licensed Docks.
As Chapters in the City Code are amended, I am putting these on the
computer, a disk for each Chapter. This will make revisions much
faster than typing whole pages.
I started and completed a project that I have wanted to do for a
long time. I took all the ordinances and amendments that have ever
been adopted by the City of Mound since its incorporation and cross
referenced them to the current code where possible. This was all
done on my Rapid File Program. Now we have a history for each
section of the Code. This will help when someone wants to know
when a particular part of an ordinance was adopted.
I~AINTENANCE OF RESOLUTION BOOK
A resolution is somewhere between a motion and an ordinance. A
resolution deals with matter of a special, administrative or
temporary nature and is put in resolution form because of its
importance or length. In 1992, the City Council adopted 162
resolutions. These are all composed, typed, signed and kept in
resolution books. Each resolution is then categorized and indexed
by subject and number in order to make them easier to find at a
later date. This catagorizing is now done with the Clerk's Index.
Copies of the resolutions are given to the various departments when
they pertain to their area. I also certify resolutions to be
recorded at Hennepin County if required.
PUBLIC NOTICES
This office arranges for the publication of official and legal
notices for such things as public hearings, changes in meeting
dates for the City Council, ordinances, and any other items that
are required by State Statutes or that the Council or City Manager
feel should be in the official newspaper.
Some public notices (vacating of streets, etc.) must also be posted
in 3 public places. The Park Dept. handles the posting and fills
out the posting affidavit.
Some bids come through my office and are advertised according to
State Statute. Some of the specifications for bids for equipment
are laid out and prepared by me with input from the specific
department head requesting the item.
I, J I
LICENSES & PERMITS
The City of Mound issued 65 licenses or permits for 15 different
purposes in 1992. This accounted for approximately $2,994.00, in
revenues. This process changed in 1992, with one less person in
the Finance Dept., I took over all licensing duties. I spent a
considerable amount of time in the administration of the licenses
and permits, i.e. notices and renewal forms are sent before they
expire; when the renewal application is received it and the
insurance papers must be gone over to be sure they are correct; the
payment receipt is made out; the names submitted to the Council for
review and approval; the license issued and sent to the applicant.
Then there are always the applicants who wait until the last minute
or have to be coaxed to get their applications and fees in before
expiration. I have inputted alot of the license information into
the computer. I am also generating the licenses on the computer
which will save money for the forms and time by not having to redo
all of them every year, just changing dates, license numbers, etc.
PUBLIC INFORMATION
I have found being City Clerk that people expect me to be the local
expert in everything from utility costs to the legality of the
latest zoning fracas. In attending State and International
conferences I find that most city clerks are used as an information
source by local citizens. I try to stay informed as to what is
going on in all aspects and departments of the City so that if I
cannot answer a question for a citizen at least I can direct them
to the proper person for an answer.
What comes along with public information is research into various
items that people have concerns about.
RECORDS MANAGEMENT
Records Management is a function concerned with the creation,
processing, maintenance, protection, retrieval, retention,
preservation and disposition of records required in the operation
and continuance of city operations. The objective is to save
space, money and time.
The City owns a microfiche recorder (camera), film processor and a
dry ink reader/printer. We have been using this equipment for
Police records that must be kept and require too much space; for
all old permanent records of the City Council i.e., resolutions,
minutes, etc. Unfortunately, there was not time to do much of this
in 1992.
4
TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY
In 1992, I dealt with 4 tax forfeit parcels of land.
4 - parcels were released to sale to adjoining property
owners;
0 - parcels were conveyed to the City for park/wetlands,
drainage, or unbuildable;
0 - parcels were released for public auction;
Hennepin County notifies us of property within the City that has
gone tax forfeit because of nonpayment of real estate taxes. They
also periodically ask about property we have taken for a public
purpose to insure that we are using it for that public purpose.
The County asks that we inform them of what we would like done with
the property i.e., allow the parcels to the sold at public auction;
require that they be sold only to adjoining property owners if they
are undersized or do not meet the zoning and building codes; or
retain them for some public purpose. There is a considerable
amount of research that must be done to determine what should be
done with the property.
The first step is to go to the tax books and get a property
description. Then the property jacket is pulled and its contents
examined to see if the property was taken for a public purpose or
is a new tax forfeit parcel.
The next step is to figure the square footage of the property and
look at the current zoning district to determine if it is a 408
buildable lot or not. After all this information is determined, it
is all put on a sheet, a plat map showing the property is made and
sent to the City Engineer, Park Director, Street Superintendent,
Sewer & Water Superintendent, Building Inspection and Finance
Director for their comments and recommendations. Occasionally, an
easement is needed for utility purposes; a survey may be needed to
determine if part of the property is in the wetlands; or there may
be reasons for the City to retain the property.
The Special Assessment Clerk in the Finance Dept. determines if
there are any assessments from before forfeiture or since
forfeiture that need to be put back on the property. The reason we
need to know assessments before and since forfeiture is that the
City gets 90% of the purchase price to apply to assessments from
before forfeiture. The assessments since forfeiture are added in
their entirety to the appraised value (determined by the Hennepin
County Assessor) of the property. In 1984, the City Council
adopted a resolution (#84-94, copy attached) setting a policy on
assessments placed on undersized tax forfeit property before
forfeiture. This has helped to encourage adjoining property owners
to purchase undersized parcels and combine them with their
property.
5
I I I
In 1987 I completed a card index by Property Identification Number
for the following:
City owned property;
Tax forfeit property that has been retained by the City
for a public purpose;
Tax forfeit property that falls into the following
categories:
a. Property released for public sale;
b. Property for sale only to and combined with
adjoining property.
Each card has a PID (property identification number), plat and
parcel, legal description, status (what it is, park, wetlands, tax
forfeit, etc.), whose name it is in (State Land Dept. or City of
Mound or both), any resolutions dealing with the parcel (resolution
number and disposition). I have now completed coordinating the
Certificates of Titles, State Deeds, easements, etc. and recorded
that type of information on each card also. This card file, is now
complete and is being kept up-to-date. It has already proved to be
a very valuable tool when someone calls in to check on a parcel of
land.
Since we started dealing with tax forfeit property in 1982:
39 parcels have been put up to public auction;
36 parcels were retained for a public purpose; and
83 parcels have been authorized to be sold to and combined
with adjoining properties;
5 temporary construction easements were reconveyed.
Of the above, 34 parcels of the 39 have been sold at public auction
and 48 of the 79 parcels have been sold to adjoining property
owners to be combine with their property. I think this shows how
this process is working to the city's advantage to get parcels back
on the tax rolls and increase conformance to the zoning ordinance.
We now have a computer program called Rapid File and I am trying to
get all this information on tax forfeit property into the computer.
I will continue to work on this during 1992.
OTHER DUTIES/RESPONSIBILITIES
BUD~ETI
In 1992, the inputting of all budget pages was done for all
departments. This included all figures for 1991, 1992 and
inserting all proposed 1993 figures. There was also preparation of
the Election Budget and joint work with the City Manager on the
City Council Budget and the Manager/Clerk Budget.
CEMETERY
In 1988, I officially took over the Mound Union Cemetery records.
In 1992, there were 18 burials and 10 graves were sold. In 1989,
I used the Rapid File program in my computer and inputted all the
information from each division of the cemetery. All the
information came off the cemetery cards which were checked and
cross-checked. This now allows us to instantly locate people by
name, owner of the grave, or lot and grave number. There are three
divisions and each is separate on the computer. I have a book that
I update every few months. It took a considerable amount of time
to do this but I feel it has really cut down on the paper work.
We had new cemetery maps made up at the end of 1992 to include all
new information.
FIRE CONTI~CTS
The Fire Department keeps track of all fire reports for each
contracting city. The fire reports are all listed according to the
City and the number of fire/rescue hours. In 1992, there were
mutual aid hours which are divided equally between the contracting
cities. The Fire Contract Material is figured on a combination
percentage of assessed value and a 3 year average of fire/rescue
hours for each contracting city. That percentage is then used on:
ao
B.
C.
D.
Operating Costs
Capital Outlay
Fireman's Relief Fund
Fire Truck Payments
In 1992, the fire hours breakdown is as follows:
ACTUAL EQUAL
CONTRACTING FIRE/RESCUE MUTUAL AID
CITY HOURS + HOURS = TOTAL
PERCENTAGE
Minnetonka
Beach 331 + 37 = 368 3.46%
Minnetrista 1179 + 37 = 1216 11.42%
Orono 936 + 37 = 973 9.14%
Shorewood 150 + 37 = 187 1.76%
Spring Park 1847 + 37 = 1884 17.70%
Mound 5979 + 37 = 6016 56.62%
TOTAL 10422 + 220 = 10644 100.00%
These hours will be integrated into the 3 year average when the
1994 contract material is figured.
7
& &
Part of the formula for figuring the fire contracts was to use the
total assessed value of the fire area in a community. This changed
a few years ago from assessed value to market value, which did not
change the percentages much but required some language change in
the original fire contracts and at the same time this was done some
other changes were made to update the contract for each fire
contracting city.
EMPLOYEE SUPERVISION
The City Manager and I supervise the Secretary/Receptionist, Linda
Strong. As I stated in the beginning of this report, Ed and I
share Linda's time. Linda is first and foremost the receptionist
who answers the phone anywhere from 60 to 80 times a day, fielding
calls to the proper people, taking messages when people are out of
the office and directing people when they come into City Hall. She
is sometimes the only contact a citizen has with City Hall and she
is excellent in giving people a positive and helpful image of the
City of Mound.
She does a lot of typing for departments who do not have
secretarial help, i.e. Finance, Liquor, and the Dock Inspector.
She is also in charge of handling all incoming and outgoing mail;
copying for various departments; office supply ordering; as well as
the duties that were mentioned before. We are lucky to have
someone who is versatile, talented and friendly.
ELECTIONS
The City Clerk must administer all elections for national, state
and county as well as city offices and special city elections.
The State Statutes governing the election process are Chapter 200
through 210 and Chapter 412. On the surface these statutes
describe the procedural steps, however, they do not describe the
election process in logical step sequence. Election laws are
constantly being revised by the state legislature and through court
rulings so it is necessary to stay on top of all changes.
I am one of 11 City Clerks chosen to serve on the Hennepin County
Elections and Voter Registration Coordinating Committee. It is
comprised of clerks giving good city representation of the county
based on experience, the size of the municipalities and the types
of election system used. This Committee deals with new legislation
affecting elections and voter registration.
1992 was an election year (Federal, State and local) and what a
year. We had three elections this year. The Presidential
Primary, the State Primary and the General Election.
April 7, 1992 - was the date for the first Minnesota Presidential
Primary Election since the 1950's. The voter turnout in Mound was
573 of a possible 5935 or 10%. This "election" cost around $4,055.
or $7.08 per vote. The State would only reimburse us for some of
the expenses - $1,994.16. So that brings the per vote cost down to
$3.60 each. We shall see what action the Legislature will take
this session on this.
Then came redistricting. That created a stir in certain parts of
Mound. The federal redistricting took small parts of Precincts 2
& 6 and put them in Congressional District #2. Enter the September
Primary Election. That redistricting created some angry citizens
when they found out they could not vote in the Jude/Sikorski race.
Now came the November General Election that seemed to go on
forever. There were 316 absentee ballots cast in this election.
Mound had an 88% voter turnout (5392 voters out of 6085). We saw
a marked increase in absentee ballots and are not sure if it was
because it was a presidential election or the fact that the
requirements for an absentee ballot were relaxed. The following is
a comparison between 1990 and 1992 for absentee ballots:
1990 Primary - 26
1990 General - 195
1992 Primary - 110
1992 General - 313
We then had the recount of the Mayor's race. This was costly and
time consuming and resulted in no change in the outcome. I feel
the judges really did their jobs in instructing the voter on the
proper way to mark their ballot. We only found 4 ballots that were
marked outside the read-path of the machine.
The State voter registration system has improved, but does not
allow us to give you some information that has been given in
previous annual reports, i.e. total transactions for the year;
additions, deletions, etc. I can tell you that between the three
elections this year there were 1248 new registered voters. I
cannot tell you how many people changed addresses. I cannot tell
you the number of registered voters as of this date because the
State has not done their deletes or purge yet.
New voter registration cards are imputted into the State system by
Hennepin County. The State then assigns a Voter Identification
Number and a mailed notice is sent to each new registrant to verify
their residence. When the cards are returned, Linda has to check
each card against the computer list to be certain State system has
the correct information. She then numbers each card with the voter
identification number, assigned by the State, and files them
alphabetically. She also deletes those as necessary.
Pre-planning is the key to holding a properly organized and well
conducted election.
i E I
We have used the Optec III-P equipment since 1988.
We begin to gear up in election year's by
Past election judges were all written letters so that they could
commit to working any one or all three of the elections to be held
this year.
The following is a synopsis of some of the procedures that were
done for the Presidential Primary, April 7, 1992, and the Primary
and General elections that were held September 15th and November
3rd.
Preparation of an election calendar is essential giving
actual dates when duties must be performed to meet legal
requirements.
Legal notices must be drafted in preparation for timely
publication and posting.
Making sure there are absentee voting materials, voter
registration supplies, election day supplies, ballots,
and ascertaining whether election day equipment, such as
voting booths and ballot boxes are in a good state of
repair.
Polling places must be designated by the City Council.
I make all necessary arrangements for the use of these
facilities. Each polling place must meet the standards
of accessibility for the elderly and the physically
handicapped.
Election judges have to be located. This can be a very
trying task because the pay is so low and the hours so
long. There must be "party balance" in each precinct and
this sometimes becomes a problem because some judges do
not want to be moved from their home precinct.
The law states that there must be a minimum of 1 judge
for every 150 registered voters in a precinct. The count
in each precinct, at 7:00 A.M. on the day of the General
Election was as follows:
Precinct #1 - Mount Olive -
Precinct #2 - Indian Knoll Manor -
Precinct #3 - Island Park Hall -
Precinct #4 - Seahorse Rec. Bldg. -
Precinct #5 - The Depot -
Precinct #6 - Library -
648 voters
569 voters
1,868 voters
1,010 voters
1,158 voters
832 voters
10
0
e
The rule of 1 judge for each 150 registered voters is not
applicable because there must be a judge for each of the
following procedures:
a®
One judge to act as a greeter (determine if the
voter is registered or not and directs to the
proper line).
be
Two judges to handle the computer print-out of
registered voters.
c. A demonstration judge.
d. A judge to hand out the ballots.
ee
A judge to be near the vote tabulator to watch for
error messages and assist voters.
f®
One or two judges to be in charge of new voter
registrations.
The law requires that election judges for all elections
be trained by a City Clerk, this also includes school
elections. We have a basic course, a review course and
an emergency course. This year the training course
changed significantly because of the change in candidates
for governor at the last minute (the Friday before the
Election on Tuesday).
The judges have to be trained to have some working
knowledge of the vote tabulators, problems that might
arise, error messages given by the tabulator, and ways to
correct problems. A video tape was produced to help in
training the judges on the changes in procedures and
workings of the new equipment.
Hennepin County does the programming for the prom pack
(memory pack) that is inserted in each machine. We have
two for each machine. One is for back-up in case there
are problems with the other. Both prom packs for each
machine are tested in each machine with a test deck of
official ballots marked so that it appears there were
different situations in voting, i.e. undervotes,
overvotes, blank ballots, crossovers (primary only), etc.
A master sheet showing the variations in votes must be
done. The results are then compared with the machine
count to determine if the machine is counting accurately.
This is very time consuming.
11
8. Applications for Absentee Ballots are obtained from City
Hall or the County and sent to the City or the County to
be filled. The ballots are then sent from City Hall or
the County to the applicant or are picked up at City Hall
or the County. The voter then casts his/her ballot and
returns the sealed envelope either in person or by
mailing it. These ballots are then held unopened until
election day.
9. City Hall is open for absentee balloting the Saturday
before an election from 1:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. and on the
Monday before election until 7:30 P.M.
10. The Monday before the Tuesday election is when each
precinct must be set up (all voting booths and
miscellaneous supplies) and keys must be obtained for the
various precincts. The locked ballot boxes with the vote
tabulators (the memory packs are sealed in the tabulators
to insure they have not been tampered with) and blank
ballots inside (these are also sealed in boxes) are
delivered to the precincts. The Election Precinct
Chairperson picks up the remaining precinct supplies
(forms to be filled out, envelopes each form must be in,
etc.) on Monday night.
11. Election day arrives for Linda and I at 5:30 A.M. I
spend most of the morning monitoring each precinct to be
sure everything is running smoothly, answering any
questions that come up and straightening out any problems
that arise. Linda takes care of any phone questions from
the public on precinct locations, etc.
12. All absentee ballots are counted on the equipment in the
precincts. This not being a normal General Election the
Absentee Ballots for the Governor's race were counted by
hand. During the primary there were 26 absentee ballots
and during the general there were 195 absentee ballots.
We had a team of judges at City Hall trained to review
the applications and ballot envelopes to determine if the
ballot was rejected or accepted based on the completeness
of the required information. After that process was
complete, the ballots in the ballot envelopes were sent
out to each precinct to be opened and run thru the
machine at the close of the polls.
13. After the polls close, the judges check and verify the
seal numbers on the memory pack to be sure it is the same
as it was opening the polls. They then take the "A"
(answer key) key, insert it in the vote tabulator and
turn it. The vote tabulator will not accept any more
ballots. A printout of vote totals will then begin.
This is the Official Results Tape. It contains the zero
12
773
tape from the beginning of the day, any messages, and the
total votes for each candidate or question.
Mound historically has a good turn-out to vote. In the General
Election 89% of the registered voters voted.
That, though, is not the end of the day because the judges must 35
bring certain supplies and items back to City Hall some of which
goes to Hennepin County that night.
There are many more clerical tasks than mentioned above that have
to be done for an election, but as you can see it is a very time
consuming job that requires accuracy and efficiency to run
properly. By the time election day is over, Linda and I usually
have put in 16-20 hours each.
The day after the election is getting the resolution and forms
ready for the Canvassing Meeting. The City Canvassing Board (City
Council) only canvasses city elections and special city elections.
We had a number of meetings before the 1992 elections completing
the above. We will be having more meetings early in 1991 to
identify equipment and programming changes that will allow the
overall operation to function more efficiently. This work will
continue in 1993.
A video for training the voter on the new equipment was aired on
cable T.V. and used as a public relations tool. The public seems
to have gotten used to the new equipment and we did have some
people who were disappointed that they could not insert their own
ballot into the equipment.
The last three years I have been on the League of Minnesota cities
Elections and Ethics Committee.
MISCELLANEOUS
SPECIAL ~SSESSMENTS
In September assessment hearing notices were prepared, the tax
books checked to verify names and addresses and notices were
written, published and sent to all parties concerned regarding the
following:
CBD (Central Business District) Parking Maintenance
Unpaid Tree Removal Charges
Delinquent Water & Sewer Charges
The CBD Assessment Roll is a very involved procedure. The expenses
are figured from June i of a given year until May 31 of the year
13
being assessed. This figure includes expenses for railroad lease,
special assessments, maintenance materials, crosswalks striping,
blacktopping of lots, Christmas decorations, lighting of lots,
parking lot leases, salaries for maintenance. This figure is sent
to each business in the CBD District. There is a very complicated
formula for spreading these expenses between the businesses in the
Central Business District. The formula is based on the following:
1. Customer parking spaces required (this is determined by
the CBD Parking Committee based on the business).
2. Employee parking spaces required.
3. The number of spaces provided by the business.
4. The first 2 items are added together and the third is
subtracted.
5. A percentage of the total is then figured on item #4.
6. The business front footage is then taken.
7. A percentage of the total is then figured on item #6.
8. The present market value is then taken.
9. A percentage of the total is then figured on item #8.
10. Next the total costs (expenses) are multiplied by the
factor .7 and that result is multiplied by item #5.
11. Next the total costs (expenses) are multiplied by the
factor .15 and that result is multiplied by item #7.
12. Next the total costs (expenses) are multiplied by factor
.15 and that result is multiplied by item #9.
13. Items 10, 11 and 12 are then added together and that is
what is proposed to be assessed to each business in the
CBD.
This year the way we handle delinquent utility bills changed. We
are no longer doing shut-offs. At the end of August we are taking
all delinquent sewer and water bills and preparing them for
certification and assessment against the benefiting property. With
the initial list, we sent out 283 notices. We actually certified
162 for collection with 1993 taxes.
Resolutions were prepared for all the above assessments. Levy
sheets were prepared for Hennepin County, resolutions certified and
all sent to the County to appear on the 1992 tax statements.
~THER MEETINGS ATTENDED
MCFOA (Minnesota Clerks, & Finance Officers, Association) ~n~ual
Meeting
I have been a member of this organization since 1982. I was
Regional Vice President for Region IV in 1984; Treasurer in 1985;
Secretary in 1986; Vice President in 1987; became the President in
1988; and a Director at Large (Immediate Past President) 1989 and
1990. This state organization has one annual conference in March
which is put on by Government Training Services and the University
14
of Minnesota Department of Professional Development and Conference
Services. It is designed to meet the needs of Minnesota clerks
from large, small and medium size cities, with different
responsibilities, and with varying years of experience. The
technical sessions provide practical information and an opportunity
for discussion with other clerks.
I received the title of MCMC (Minnesota Certified Municipal Clerk)
in March 1985 after completing the required courses and extra
seminars offered by the University of Minnesota Continuing
Education.
Out of the 855 cities in Minnesota there are over 550 members in
MCFOA.
IIMC (Internatlonal Institute of Municipal Clerks) Conference
I have been a (CMC) Certified Municipal Clerk since November 1985.
The State of Minnesota presently has over 345 member cities in the
IIMC. We are 9th out of 77 (including the 50 states, 12 Canadian
provinces, and 15 other countries such as Australia, New Zealand,
Israel, United Kingdom, South Africa) in membership to IIMC. Total
IIMC membership is over 9,977 up 109 over 1990.
I attended the annual IIMC Conference from May 17 - May 22. The
theme this year was "Reach Out To Touch Your World", and was
reflected in the variety of topics covered in the educational
sessions, presentations and the extensive exhibits. This was a very
interesting and beneficial conference with over 40 different
workshops in topics such as, records management, local government
productivity, elections, professional development, personnel
management, communications, supervising, to name a few.
I am currently serving my third year of a three year term on the
IIMC Board of Directors representing Region VI (Iowa, Minnesota and
Wisconsin). I have also been appointed to the IIMC
Education/Personal Growth Committee.
The IIMC Mid-Year Board of Directors Meeting was held in November
in New Orleans, Louisiana. This was a very exciting meeting
because we held a two day retreat prior to the Board Meeting. The
purpose was twofold: first, to strenghten the existing board
members' relationships and to provide a sense of belonging to new
board members; and second, to develop direction for the
organization through a goal-setting process. The following was the
mission statement that was developed during the session, "The
International Institute of Municipal Clerks prepares its membership
to meet the challenge of the diverse roles of the municipal clerk
by providing services and continuing professional development
opportunities to benefit members and the government entities they
serve."
15
IIMC (INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL CLERKS} REGION V!
~EETINGS
I attended the Region VI Meeting in LaCrosse, Wisconsin because it
is central to the three states (Iowa, Wisconsin and Minnesota) in
our region. Bernard Kahl (Mukowango, Wisconsin) and myself
conducted this meeting as Region VI Directors for IIMC. This gives
us a chance to bring information we obtained at the IIMC Mid-Year
Board Meeting back to our fellow members.
Some of the other meetings attended were:
- League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Conference.
- League of Minnesota Cities Elections & Ethics Committee.
I have tried to highlight some of the activities in 1992. In
summation, the City Clerk's position encompasses many areas that
require time, effort and knowledge beyond that of a clerk in a
larger city with a full staff to do the elementary tasks. I find
the work very challenging and personally rewarding and I am happy
I can contribute to Mound and its citizens. I feel continuing
education, working on various committees with affiliated
organizations, receiving and sharing information with other cities
makes me more effective in my position and I want to thank the
Council for their support.
fc
16
?77
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
RESOLUTION APPOINTING JIH FACKLER THE ASSISTANT ~EED
INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF HOUND IN L993
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Mound, Minnesota, does hereby appoint Park Director, Jim Fackler,
as the Assistand Weed Inspector for the City of Mound in 1993.
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF ~%N APPLICATION
FOR AN INCENTIVE GRANT FOR RECYCLING
WHEREAS, the Incentive Grants Committee pursuant to the
Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy has developed
the 1993 Incentive Grant Guidelines and Application; and
WHEREAS, Recycling Coordinator Joyce Nelson has completed
this application and is requesting $4,050.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize submittal of
the 1993 Incentive Grant Application for $4,050.00.
HENNEPIN
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
4'17 North Fifth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 5540'I- ~ 309
Phone: [6'12] 348-6846
FAX: [6'12] 348-8532
January29, 1993
Ms. JoyceNelson
City of Mound
5341MaywoodRoad
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Joyce:
Attached are the 1993 Incentive Grant Guidelines and Application, developed by the
Incentive Grants Committee pursuant to the Hennepin County Residential Recycling
Funding Policy. Applications for Incentive Grants must be submitted to the Department
of Environmental Management by 5:00 p.m. on Monday, March 1, 1993. A resolution
authorizing submittal of the application must accompany the application.
The Incentive Grants Committee will meet in early March to evaluate and select
proposals to receive Incentive Grants. Municipalities awarded grants will be given a
Grant Agreement from the County to enter into and will receive grant funds upon
execution of that agreement.
If you have any questions, please call me at 348-6358.
Sincerely,
Paul M. Kroening ...~
Planner, Recycling Unit
c:
Bob Thomas
Carl Michaud
HENNEPIN COUNTY
on ~'quol opportunity ~mploye'r
,; j i j I
1993 INC~ GRANT APPLICATION
HENNEPIN COUNTY RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
due by March 1, 1993
PROJECT INFORMATION
Attach any supporting documentation and a resolution passed by your
Council/Board/Commission approving submittal of this application.
A. Project Desc~ption: Please provide a brief description of thc proposed
project. Spring & Fall Recycling Days, we have trucks from Goodwill,
Appliances, tires, TV's (etc.), scrape metal, now we've added.phone
books & carpeting. Resident's can also bring in their damaged recycling
container and receive a new one (old ones will be recycled) or. buy
extra containers if they want.
B. Project Goal(s): Please det~l how project will meet goals established in Part
V., Section A., of the Incentive (3rant guidelines.
We'll be having this program on a Saturday S Sunday, employees will
change their work days so no overtime will be paid. This is a chance
for residents to dispose of some items that can be used for others.
C. Project Criteria: Please briefly describe how project addreaes each ranking
criteria listed below.
1. Potential waste abatement: In the Spring S Fall of 92 a total
of 195.94 tons of material was collected.
2. Direct benefit of resulB from project activities: Mound is the only city in this area that sponsers this, residents from Spring
ri
Park. Minnetrista and Shorewood and other cities, in theEk l§SPcee~ior
of 92 we received checks from people in Brooklyn Center,
3. Applicability and replicability of pr~ect actMties and result:
4. COst-effectiveness: The costs to collect the 195.94 tons last year was about $2,000.
5. Degree of newness and innovativeness: This project isn't really new
but we keep adding items and the residents just think it's the greatest
thing:
6. Financial need or availability of funds from other sources: Residents do
pay to dispose of their appliances, tires, TV's, but the City
covers the cost of Goodwill, food & pop, a bathroom, Etc.
7. Feasibility of conducting and completing project:
8. Demonstrated need: In the Fall of 1992, we have a household
count of 3,34Z homes. There were over 1,000 cars that came
thru. In the'Spring we were too busy to count cars.
9. Potenti~ to reduce overMl cos~: Residents can be sure that their
applican6s, Goodwill items, TV's (etc) scrape metal will be recycled
10. Measurement ofpr~e~ outcome: We receive reports from vendors
on tonnage material.
IlL
BHefly describe results anticipated horn proje~ actMties and outcomes.
Increase tonnage for the City of Hound, help residents dispose of
materials in a cost effective way.
We are also planning on handing out some SMART shopping guides to
people that bring items in on our Recycling Days.
PROJECT COSTS
A. Program Administration $. 550. GO
B. Program Promotion $ _
C. Operating Costs $ 3~500.00
D. Capital Costs
Specify: ., " $
Total Project Costs
Amount of Grant Request
$_ 41050.00
$ 4,050.00
APPLICANT INFORMATION
A. City(les)
Mound
B. Contact Name
Address
~lson
5341 Ma ood Road Mound
Phone
472-0603
V. SIGNATURES
Recycling Coordinator
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
RESOLUTION THANKING THE MOUND POLICE RESERVES
FOR THEIR WORK AND ASSISTANCE TO THE
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
~FHEREAS, in 1992, the Mound Police Reserve Unit
contributed 5,705 hours of community service to the citizens of
Mound; and
WHEREAS, these hours translate into the equivalent of
having two additional officers available and results in a major
financial savings to the citizens of Mound; and
WHEREAS, the officers of the Mound Police Reserve Unit
have shown outstanding commitment and the highest degree of service
and ability to this City.
WHEREAS, Police Chief Harrell requests that the Mound
Police Reserves receive public recognition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, in recognition of these fine
contributions, does hereby thank and honor the Mound Police Reserve
Unit for their dedicated service to our community and encourages
Mound residents to express their gratitude to its members:
Capt. James Foxf
Lt. Tom Geyen--
Sgt. Robin Liljeberg
Sgt. Lind Norton
Sgt. Kathleen Fox
Off. Tom Berent
Off. Patrick Cole
Off. Terry Erdman
Off. Jeff Fleming
Off. Paul Haarstad
Off. Larry Lying
Off. Jason Maas
Off. Sarah Nassett
Off. Sam Nelson
Off. Dick Qunell
Off. Jason Swenson
793
SECTION 00030
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
City of Mound, Minnesota
1993 Seal Coat Program
Sealed bids will be received, publicly opened, and read aloud at the Mound
City Hall at ll:O0 AM., Friday, April 2, 1993 for application of approximately
40,000 gallons of bituminous material and 2,000 tons of seal coat aggregate.
The bids will be considered by the City Council at their meeting Tuesday,
April 13, 1993 at 7:30 P.M.
All proposals shall be addressed to:
Fran Clark, City Clerk
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
And shall be securely sealed, shall be endorsed on the outside with the
statement "Proposal for 1993 Seal Coat Program, City of Mound" and shall be on
the Proposal Form included in the specifications for the project.
Copies of the plans, specifications and other proposed contract documents
are on file with the City Clerk and at the offices of McCombs Frank Roos
Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers and Surveyors, 15050 23rd Avenue North,
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447. Plans and specifications for use in preparing bids
may be obtained at the office of the Engineer upon deposit of $20.00. The full
amount of the deposit will be refunded to each bidder who has made a deposit
and has filed a bid with the Owner upon return of the plans and specifications
within ten (10) days after the bids are opened.
Each bidder shall file with his bid a certified check, or bid bond in an
amount not less than five (5) percent of the total amount of the bid. No bid
may be withdrawn within sixty (60) days after the bids are opened.
The City of Mound reserves the right to reject any or all bids and waive
any informalities or irregularities therein.
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
ATTEST: Fran Clark, City Clerk
Skip Johnson, Mayor
END OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
ADVERTISENENT FOR BIDS
ooo3o
MFRA #6173
BILLS .............. February 23, 1993
BATCH 3013
BATCH 3022
TOTAL BILLS
$183,056.39
113,063.17
$296,119.56
Z
(:3
o
oc~,
Z
L~I
Z
O,,,J
OZ
_.JQ~
d
§
o
o
Z
uJ
&
Z
I I
I I
Z
IIIIIIIii
,,, 7,,7
0
n~
o
z
i~1
r~
%.
:JO
Z
! ! !
ill
.h'-
0 "~
Or.
Z
'~0
?
IIIIllllllllll
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
.,.to
I I
e
I, &
~ ° °l
?
I ! I
Z
_J
Z
~'w Z
::3,
Z
Z
Z
0
13,.
~ I
Z Z
ZQz
~ "3
8
-.~
Z
::3
0
~.~
Z
Z
0
~0
'. Z
I
o
I I I !
oo oo
I
-r-
I
Z
gg
S
o ._g ~
Z
Z
Z
~-i 0
1-.7
Z~
o
o
I I
0',0,
I I
! !
Z
Z
g
o
(~.
0
,,"-.
Z
L.~
'/1
Lid
.,J
¢L -,,.t
0
0
Z
L,ul
I I I
! !
g ~ g
!
IIII
~,~°
! ! I
! !
UJ
~J
L
0
0
'Z
Z
uJ L~
&
~ ~ °°
I I I I I I ~1 I II III III I
0
44 .......... 4 '' '; ..... 44 .............
0
o
Z
':::2,
0
~0
c~
Z
t~
. I
0
Z
o
:0
t~-
0
~-~
Z
0
0
Z
Z
Z
0
.J
bJ
° ~ °
Z
0~
0 I
C,..J
,','Z
u. jn,
0
~J~ Z
0
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE
AGENDA
Monday, February 22, 1993, 4:30 PM
Norwest Bank Building
900 E. Wayzata Blvd, Room 135
(Elevator access for Handicapped;
use west entrance on Wayzata Blvd.)
Hennepin County 1993 Lakes Improvement Program,
Denis Bailey:
A. Seton Channel Slow Buoy Map update
B. Slow Buoy Map
C. Lake Maintenance Program
Special Events
A. Deposit Refund @ $100
1) Lafayette Club Family Fishing Derby, 2/7/93
B. Draft code amendment to allow the Executive Director
to approve new Special Event Licenses
Decibel subcommittee -- plan date and arrangements for
decibel testing program in April
Water Patrol Report
A. Monthly Activity Report
Additional business
2/12/93
FEB 6 1993
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force
Agenda
8:30 am, Friday, February 19, 1993
Norwest Bank Bldg Conference Rm 135, Wayzata
1. Introductions, Chair Tom Penn
Review, acceptance of 1/22/93 minutes as mailed (page 6
and 7 re-edited with additional reports from audio tape)
e
Scientific Subcommittee report and recommendation on
third draft, 2/5/93, of Experimental Design to Evaluate
Fluridone for Whole Lake Control of Eurasian Water
Milfoil.
MN Lakes Association (MLA) Exotics Species Committee
report on legislative draft of a bill to strengthen state
controls, treatment and increase funding for milfoil and
other exotics.
5. Hennepin Parks Report, John Barten;
6. Lake Association reports;
7. Additional business;
8. Confirm March meeting -- Fri., 19th, adjourn
TRI
CABLEVISION
1504 2nd St. S.E., P.O. Box 110, Waseca, MN 56093
507/835-5975 FAX 507-835-4567
February 10, 1993
City Clerk
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364
Dear City Clerk:
We are approaching a sun outage period which will cause loss of
satellite signal. Sun outages are a normal part of satellite
operation and occur every year in the spring and fall.
Outages occur when the orbital positions of the earth, satellite
dish earth stations, and the sun are aligned. Normally, earth
stations receive transmissions only from satellites beaming
cable signals to us. During periods of strong solar flares, the
solar waves overpower the satellite signal, and earth stations
pick up both transmissions. This usually results in noisy
outages called "sun outages." There is nothing that can be done
to prevent these outages.
The upcoming sun outage period will begin Saturday, February 27
and will end Saturday, March 13. The outages will last less
than 20 minutes a day. They should occur sometime between
11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and 2:15 p.m. to 3:15 p.m.
If you have any questions, please call us at 1-800-332-0245.
Sincerely,
TRIAX CABLEVISION
l, &
CABLEVISION
1504 2nd St. S.E., P.O. Box 110, Waseca, MN 56093
507/835-5975 FAX 507-835-4567
FEB 1 8 1992
February 17, 1993
City Clerk
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364
Dear City Clerk:
In the past, Triax Cablevision has used many door-to-door
efforts in the Lake Minnetonka area. We've now designed a
way to lessen the number of door-to-door crews we send
through the area by replacing them with a flyer that your
local non-profit organizations can raise money delivering.
Between the months of March and April, these groups will
simply place the flyer in a secure place at the doorway, and
proceed to the next home. This method is very quick, clean
and very effective.
If you have any questions regarding this promotional
campaign, please don't hesitate to call me at
1-800-332-0245.
Sincerely,
.....
Marketing Coordinator
FEB 1
February 1993
To the Mayor and members of the City Council.
Recently I put my name in for the position on the Metropolitan Waste
Commission that would represent your city. I would be greatly appreciative if
you would send a letter to the Metropolitan Council recommending me for the
position.
My experience is as follows:
Fourteen years on the Shorewood City Council
Two years as Mayor of Shorewood
Served two terms on the Board of Directors for the Metropolitan
Municipalities Association, during which I chaired one of the policy
committees.
Assisted in the organization of Women in Government, was on the Board
of Directors, and served as an officer.
Assisted in the organization of Women in City Government, was on the
Board of Directors, was the organization's second President and later
served as the Treasurer.
Served for ten years on the Board of Directors for Suburban Public Health
Nursing (It merged with Mpls Nursing and became Visiting Nurses during
the time I was on the Board.)
A thirty-year resident of Shorewood.
While on the Shorewood City Council, I had occasion to discuss several
matters with the members of the Waste Commission Board and also with the
Administrative personnel. Generally, the discussion centered on the inequities
of the fee schedule for those cities around Lake Minnetonka. At other times I
debated the decision that was made regarding their lines, and where "I and I'
was entering the system. If I am appointed to the Board, I would continue to
pursue those two issues.
My extensive community service demonstrates that I am honest, hard-
working, thoughtful, and tenacious. I have always tried to get all possible
information on an issue before making a decision, and I will continue to work
in that manner. If I am appointed to the Board I will listen to the Councils I
would represent and do my best for them.
Thank you for your consideration of my request.
t/~,~S~ct'
Terminology. Definitions
Direction--Location of parking with respect to the ramp.
Distance--Distance of parking with respect to the ramp (along streets).
_Area--Area available for parking. (Width of the area is 10' wide unless
otherwise noted.)
Sl~aces--Number of Car/Trailer rigs that fit into each "area."
(car/Trailer spaces are 50'X lO'.)
Status--The status of the parking for each "Area."
(Public parking, no parking, private property, etc.)
Definitions for terminology used in the "Status" column.
Public --Areas where parking is available for public use.
N P--Area designated no parking.
Private-- Areas that are privately owned which can accommodate
Car/Trailer parking if an arrangement can be made with property
owner.
Posted--Areas which are posted no parking between 7-9 AM and 4-6 PM,
Monday - Friday, but stlould be available for weekend Car/Trailer
parking.
D Park--Areas which allow day parking only, no parking 2-6 AM.
Permit--Road side areas where a permit is needed to park.
Posts--Areas which are restricted by posts.
P City-- Privately owned city land that is off of the road side.
are approximately 150 feet apart. If these signs were removed
approximately two more spaces could be added to the total. Parking
between these signs is factored into the car/trailer parking count ( two
spaces). In addition to this there is more parking space available beyond the
2000' boundary further West on 51.
Spring Park Landing
Direction
East on 15
South side of Northern Ave.
No. Side of 15 heading West
Distance Area Spaces Listed Status
1085 90x45 (6) Private
1175 Henn. Co. Truck Station, not included.
808-1108 300x30 6 NP
1108-1165 78 1 Public
1310-1500 190 3 Public
1500-2000 500 10 N P
150-250 100 (2) Private
750-950 200 4 Public
! 000 145x 190 (9) Private
1085 330x40 (12) Private
1660-1825 165 3 N P
1825-2140 315x30 6 NP
Totals
Public Car/Trailer S. paces
25 Marked No Parking
29 Private
62 Possible Car/Trailer Spaces
Comments: There are two locations listed above which have the potential
to park a larger number of car/trailer rigs than is listed above. The size of
these areas is large enough that they could accommodate an angle parking
pattern. The numbers listed above represent the number of rigs the area can
park using a parallel parking pattern. Not listed above is the number of rigs
the truck station can park.
Cooks Bay Landing ~ ~lc~ t~,~1 ~/:: )
Direction
North on i 10: East side
Distance Area Spaces Listed. Status
345-425 80 2 Posted
509-590 81 2 Posted
635-700 65 1 Posted
745-876 131 2 Posted
913-1044 131 2 Posted
I, & I
GTE. Parking Lot
West side
West on il 0: North side.
South Side
Beachwood Road: North side.
South on High'l{~ Road
Around Park: to right
to left
1073-1175 102 2 Posted
1221 155x60 25 Private
1223-1351 128 2 Posted
1642- ! 783 141 2 Posted
1856-1984 128 2 Posted
134-214 80 1 Posted
259-309 50 1 Posted
504-564 60 1 Posted
714-834 120 2 Posted
874-934 60 I Posted
965-1040 75 1 Posted
1080-1220 140 2 Posted
1328-1410 82 1 Posted
1550- 1670 ! 20 2 Posted
1710-2000 290 5 Posted
'-31~ ~15 iuz .o ,.,~
17 r
1406-1556 150 3 ark, ~
1755-2000 245 4 D Park
~13 507 194 3 NP --
~ ~, ~u~ 2 N P-
,~, , ~ ~ 1 N P
1450-1570 120 2 D Park
1618-1720 102 2 DPark
! 750-1950 200 4 D Park
750-1250 500 10 Public
1540-1792 252 =
.-, D Park
1833-2000 167 3 D Park
1080-1145 65 1 D Park
1575-1675 100 2 D Park
1890- 1990 1 O0 2 D Park
2,,,.-,~,_. 25 ~,0 ~ ~
Totals
1 2 Public Car/Trailer Spaces
'l-z~~d .~.e Park!ng
25 Private
6 ! With Restrictions
1 10 Possible Car/Trailer Spaces
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Lake Access Parking Agreement
This Agreement is made between the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District (LMCD) and the ( )
both public corporations organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS the LMCD and ( } are Jointly
concerned with providing public boating access to Lake
Minnetonka, meeting the Parking Standards for Lake
Minnetonka, and
WHEREAS the LMCD and ( ) recognize that
a goal of 700 car/trailer spaces will be provided in the
vicinity of present and future access sites around the lake
on as equitable a basis as possible,
NOW, THEREFORE~ it is agreed by the LMCD and (
) that the conditions for car/trailer parking
for the public access identified on the checklist identified
as Exhibit "A" and Parking Site Plan identified as Exhibit
"B" meet Parking Standards on the checklist as indicated.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the LMCD and (
have caused this agreement to be duly executed this
of ~ 19 ..... .
)
day
LAKE MINNETONKA
CONSERVATION DISTRICT:
AGENCY/CITY:
By By
FEB 8 lgg3
e
EXHIBIT A
Checklist for Evaluating Lake Minnetonka
Public Access Car/Trailer Parking Agreements
Access Name
Access City
Lake Zone No.
Car/Trailer (C/T) Parking by Location: # of spaces
a. Off-street, on access site ........
(On-site designated trailer parking on
grass is acceptable if vehicle is parked on
graded or paved surface.)
b. Off-street~ remote from access site ....
* Distance in feet from access site
c. On-street~ less than 1,500 feet:
* Designated signed C/T only, count 100% of
C/T parking spaces available . . .
* Not signed~ count 75% of spaces available "
d. On-street, 1,501 feet to 2,000 feet: -"
* Designated signed C/T only, count 100% of
C/T parking spaces available . . .
* Not signed, count 75% of spaces available
Vehicle Only Parking Spaces - these count up to "
10% of total number of C/T spaces on lot:
# of standard vehicles spaces 9' x 19'
# of handicapped vehicle spaces 12' x 19'
Total # of vehicle only spaces ....
Count total vehicle only spaces or 10% of "
total C/T parking spaces in lots whichever is less
Total~ car/trailer parking spaces at site . . .
COOPERATING PROVISIONS: Initial as
accepted:
1. Access site plan illustrating each C/T space
with adequate ingress, egress, and maneuvering
space is kept on file and current with LMCD.
e
Signage provided at access site is clear,
aesthetically attractive, consolidated for
easy updating .
Ail spaces are available on unrestricted, £irst-
come~ first-served basis~ from Memorial Day to
Labor Day, 5:00 pm Friday until midnight Sunday.
Fifty percent (50%) of spaces meeting Parking
Standards are available weekdays.
Ail on-street parking spaces meet the following
standards:
a. Minimum length of 50 feet per space
b. Adequate shoulder width to preclude door
opening into traffic lane.
Page 2
Checklist for Evaluating Lake Minnetonka
Public Access Car/Trailer Parking Agreement
Safe pedestrian route to access point
provided.
de
On-street car/trailer parking spaces are
illustrated and kept current on a plan by
street name on file with the LMCD.
A temporary boat mooring facility is provided
at the ramp site for a number of boats equal to
10% of the C/T parking spaces at the site for
C/T parking spaces between 1,501 feet and
2~000 feet.
Agency/city reserves the right to make changes
in access site plan off-street parking or
on-street designated or non-designated parking
as public policy priorities may require, with a
good faith effort to replace lost C/T spaces
at the earliest possible date, notifying the
LMCD of anticipated changes.
City retains approval privilege on any actions
of an agency regulating parking allowances or
restrictions on county or state highways affecting
C/T parking in the vicinity of an access site.
Agency/city agrees to enter into this agreement
for a period of years (five years desired)
in recognition of the valuable recreational
opportunities offered on Lake Minnetonka.
Amended
~0.
WHEREAS; the .Park and Recreation Sec~lon of Mound"m
Comprehensive Plan states that M~und is presently 91%
developed and that the City of Mound should expand its
existing ownership of natural areas and open space;
WHBRRAB~ the c~t~zens of Mouna are concerned about
lo88 of natural habitat throughout the world and recognize
the need for local efforts to protect and restore natural
W11F~F~g, "Teal Points" and Other properties may be lost
forever to development if immediate steps are not taken to
protect these properties.
NOW, THBREFORB, the undersigned reques= that She Mound
City Council initiate a referendum at the earliest practical
date to ask the citizens of Mound whether they wish to
purchase and preserve forever the last remaining undeveloped
properties in MOund.
NAME ADDRESS~ TELEPHONE
~d $~uklew City
5341 Haywood Road
Moundw MN 5§364-1687
FAX ~ - 472-0620
1.
2.
Park and Open space Commission
Dovelopmon~
pstition for Referendum
- EAW for Teal Points
Dear Hr. Shukle,
During our telephone co~versatio~ last week, you stated that
. OU WOUld ask the. City Council tonight about whether they
~igh the Park commission .to review the EAW.
time we d~ecussod the possibility o£ a ro£erendum
At the same other re ertiee. You suggested
~o purchase Teal PoUnCe_ ~d_..._it ~ ~tition tO the City
· citizens o~ Nounu ~m r - ..
that the . - - the City council may
ouncil. To ge= a b~tt~r idea of ~hgt ..... ~.
want I have enclosed a sample
, would a reciate it if you
il's review and comment. I PP
Coun¢ .... =-- ~-- to tonight's Council agenda. (If .
would a ........ -~- -~~re could attend the nexn
COW meeting to discuss this matter in de~ail.)
I~ ~ossible, please call me ~oday w~h any additio"al
oommont~ or queen'one.
Thank you.
2854 Cambridge Lane
Mound~ I~N 55364
47~-1099
472-4771
sot ~ile
~nolosure
FE[3 2 1993
-~I~ DATE:
TO:
SUBJECT:
Crossroads To Service
February 18, 1993
' Hennepin County, City, School District, and Special District '/~
Finance Officers
Pat O'Connor, Director, Property Tax and Public Records~
Petitions for Revie w, 1993 ~,~_.~
Despite the current downturn in the economy, it has been the experience of Hennepin
County that its taxpayers continue to pay their taxes on a timely basis and that
delinquencies have not grown disproportionately during the past couple of years.
There is, however, a consequence of these economic times that has had a very real
impact on the tax settlements received by all jurisdictions within the county. This is
the growing number of petitions for review which have been filed primarily by owners
of commercial/industrial property. Property tax refunds issued as a result of these
petitions have dramatically reduced settlements to the districts where the properties
are located. Attached for your information is a bar chart showing the numbers of
petitions received during the past few years. You can see the dramatic increases.
As you are likely aware, in 1991 we were able to process a large number of these
petitions and in excess of thirty million dollars of tax collections were refunded to
taxpayers. All taxing jurisdictions, including Hennepin County, felt the pinch of these
refunds. In 1992, while the number of petitions received continued at an extremely
high number, the Courts and the County were able to process far fewer petitions
because of the sheer volume of petitions coming in. You most likely saw a reduction
in these refunds this past year.
This year, however, we are making a determined effort to catch up with the large
backlog of petitions through increased use of automation and increased staffing. We
are advising you that your settlements this year will likely reflect this effort. By how
much? We don't know, although we would very much like to. There are so many
variables involved that predictions are nearly impossible. The number of petitions is
not a reliable indicator since a single petition can involve multiple parcels, or worse,
relate to a significant parcel in your taxing jurisdiction. Also, it is impossible to guess
what dollar settlements the assessors and/or the courts may direct or agree to.
Finally, the petitions themselves do not contain specific dollar amounts of abatements
requested, they simply request a review.
So you can see the dilemma facing us all. Too many unknowns, but a potential for
significant negative impact on tax revenues we are all counting on. To help deal with
this issue, we will be sending out shortly, a listing of petitions affecting your
Hennepin County, City, School District,
and Special District Finance Officers
Page 2
February 18, 1993
iurisdiction. This list will show the parcels and their market value at the time the
petition was filed. Hopefully this information will be of help to you. Also, please do
not hesitate to call on my office if we can provide you with any additional information.
We'll do whatever we can to help. Please call me at 348-4084, Marie Kunze at 348-
5100, or Kathryn Nelson at 348-7361.
3,500
Tax Court Petitions Filed
3,000 .......................................................
2,500
2,000
1,500 .................... 1.42.4...
1,166
1,000 .........
787
2,651
3,091
5OO
0
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
County Assessor's Office
,1
GENERALFUND
Taxes
Intergovernmental
Business Licenses
Non- Business
Licenses and
Permits
Charges for
Services
Court Fines
Charges to Other
Departments
Other Revenue
TOTAL REVENUE
FIRE FUND
RECYCLING FUND
LIQUOR FUND
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
CEMETERY FUND
DOCKS FUND
BUDGET
1,217,590
860,500
3,260
69,500
48,750
65,00O
12,390
58,500
2,335,490
244,200
113,550
1,200,000
350,000
650,000
4,200
73,280
CITY OF MOUND
1993 BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
JANUARY 1993
JANUARY YTD
REVENUE REVENUE
VARIANCE
0 0
0 0
384 384
4,041
244
0
1,529
50
6,248
49,617
3,363
87,816
27,199
53,940
0
8,080
rev-93
8.33%
PER CENT
RECEIVED
(1,21 7,590) 0.0O%
(860,5o0) 0.00%
(2,876) 11.78%
4,041 (65,459) 5.81%
244 (48,506) 0.50%
o (65,o0o) 0.00%
1,529 (10,861)12.34%
50 (58,450). o.0o%
6,248 (2,329,242) 0.27%
49,617 (194,583) 20.32%
3,363 (110,187) 2.96%
87,816 (1,112,184) 7.32%
27,199 (322,801) 7.77%
53,940 (596,060) 8.30%
0 (4,200) 0.00%
8,080 (65,200) 11.03%
02122/93
G.B.
exp-93
CITY OF MOUND
1993 BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT
JANUARY 1993 8.33%
GENERAL FUND
Council
Promotions
Cable TV
City Manager/Clerk
Elections
Assessing
Finance
Corn puter
Legal
Police
Civil Defense
Planning/Inspections
Streets
Shop & Stores
City Property
Parks
Summer Recreation
Contingencies
Transfers
GENERAL FUND TOTAL
BUDGET
57,500
2,000
1,380
170 380
2 140
46 550
145900
24 000
79.000
779.200
4,0OO
138,44O
406,750
17,100
97,160
174,340
33,1 O0
10,000
136,840
2,325,780
JANUARY
EXPENSE
YTD PER CENT
EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED
16,516 16,516 40,984 28.72%
83 83 1,917 4.15%
0 0 1,380 0.00%
10,070 10,070 160,310 5.91%
1,696 1,696 444 79.25%
85 85 46,465 0.18%
6,831 6,831 139,069 4.68%
7,496 7,496 16,504 31.23%
5,093 5,093 73,907 6.45%
52,395 52,395 726,805 6.72%
906 906 3,094 22.65%
5,023 5,023 133,417 3.63%
15,950 15,950 390,800 3.92%
240 240 16,860 1.40%
3,009 3,009 94,151 3.10%
4,795 4,795 169,545 2.75%
0 0 33,100 0.00%
0 0 10,000 0.00%
10,243 10,243 126,597 7.49%
140,431 140,431 2,185,349 6.04%
Area Fire
Service Fund
Recycling Fund
Liquor Fund
Water Fund
Sewer Fund
Cemetery Fund
Docks Fund
244,200 25,800 25,800 218,400 10.57%
99,350 10,374 10,374 88,976 10.44%
194,620 9,418 9,418 185,202 4.84%
358,190 14,769 14,769 343,421 4.12%
761,350 51,695 51,695 709,655 6.79%
4,790 0 0 4,790 0.00%
55,440 307 307 55,133 0.55%
02122/93
G.B.
,I,
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA
7:00 PM - Public Hearing
7:30 PM - Regular Meeting
Wednesday, February 24, 1993
Tonka Bay City Hall
4901Manitou Road (County Rd 19)
7:00 PM - PUBLIC HEARING
West Point Place Homeowners Association, Lafayette Bay, Tonka Bay - new
multiple dock license application for a pre-existing eight slip dock
7:30 PM - REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Cochran
~.ADING OF MINUTES - 1/27/93 Board Meeting
PUBLIC COMMENTS - From persons in attendance on subjects not on agenda
COMMITTEE REPORTS
WATER STRUCTURES, Chair Babcock
A. Approval of minutes, meeting of 2/13/93
B. Non-encased Molded Polystyrene Foam Prohibited in Floating
Structures, Draft Ordinance amending LMCD Code Sect. 2.12;
recommending approval of first reading as amended by committee
C. Special Density Licenses - Failure to Construct Licensed Docks
within a Specified Time, Draft Ordinance amending LMCD Code
Sect. 2.05, Subd. 8; recommending approval of second reading as
amended by committee
D. Length Variances and Dock Lengths for Docks, Draft Ordinance
amending LMCD Code Sect. 1.07, Subd. 3 and Sect. 2.01, Subd.
2. a); recommending approval of second reading, waiving third
E. Multiple Dock Licenses:
1. Renewals without change-paid in full, village certificates
approved; recommending approval per attached list
2. Renewals without change-village certificate approved;
recommending approval subject to balance due being paid in
full by 3/31/93 per attached list
3. Renewals with minor change, recommending approval subject
to balance due being paid in full by 3/31/93 per attached
4. District Mooring Areas, renewals without change;
recommending approval per attached list
5. Lakeside Marina, Maxwell Bay, Orono; recommending action to
be taken regarding advertising of unlicensed off-lake
storage
LMCD Board of Directors Agenda, 2/24/93, Page 2
Me
Ge
Unrestricted Watercraft storage at licensed multiple dock
facilities-recommending approval of concepts developed by
subcommittee
Additional business recommended by committee
e
LAKE USE AND RECREATION, Chair Foster
A. Approval of minutes, meeting of 2/22/93
B. Hennepin County 1993 Lakes Improvement Program
1. Seton Channel Slow Buoy Map
2. Slow Buoy Map for entire lake
3. Lake Maintenance Program planned by D~nis Bailey
C. Special Events
1. Deposit Refund of $100 for Lafayette Club Family Fishing
Derby 2/7/93
2. Special Event Licenses~ Allowing Executive Director to
Approve New, as well as renewal, Draft Ordinance amending
Sect. 3.09; first reading
D. Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol Report
E. Additional business recommended by committee
ENVIRONMENT
A. Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force, Chair Penn
1. Approval of minutes, meeting of 2/19/93
2. Task Force recommendations from 2/19/93 meeting
LAKE ACCESS TASK FORCE, Chair Grathwol
A. Subcommittee Progress
5. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, Chair Carlson
A. Approval of minutes, meeting of 2/4/93
B. Staggered terms for board members, final review
C. Lake Access Task Force facilitator agreement approval
D. Discussion on objectives as reviewed by staff, assign to
committees
FINANCIAL REPORTS, Treasurer Carlson
A. January Statement of Cash Transactions
B. Audit of Vouchers for Payment
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT° Strommen
A. Purchase of laser printer, staff recommendation
B. Appointment to MN Sustainable Development Initiative Recreation
Team
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
A. SAVE THE LAKE Program priorities of the LMCD Board members
ADJOURNMENT
2/19/93
FEB 2, lgg3
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Regular Meeting
7:30 p.m., Wednesday, January 27, 1993
Tonka Bay City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chair Cochran at 7:30 PM.
ROLL CALL
Members Present: David Cochran, Chair. Greenwood: James
Grathwol, Excelsior: Mike Bloom, Minnetonka Beach: Scott Carlson.
Treasurer. Minnetrista; Thomas Reese, Mound; JoEllen Hurt, Orono:
Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Douglas Babcock. Secretary. Spring
Park, (arrived as noted}; Tom Penn, Vice Chair, Tonka Bay; Duane
Markus, Wayzata. Also present: Charles LeFevere, Counsel;
Deputy Kent Shilling, Sheriff's Water Patrol; Rachel Thibault,
Administrative Technician; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director.
Members Absent: Bert Foster, Deephaven; Wm. Johnstone,
Minnetonka; George C. Owen, Victoria, Robert Slocum, Woodland.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no comments from persons in attend-
ance on subjects not on the agenda.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Chair Cochran proceeded with the Environment Committee
report, awaiting the arrival of the Water Structures and Lake Use
and Recreation Committee Chairs.
1. ENVIRONMENT
A. Environment Committee, Chair Hurr
1) Approval of minutes, meeting of 1/12/93.
Hurt submitted the minutes of the Environment Committee
meeting of 1/12/93. She called attention to the discussions on
the proposed ordinance prohibiting use of non-encased molded
expanded bead polystyrene flotation material and the trunk high-
way 101\Grays Bay bridge replacement environmental impact state-
ment (EIS). Chair Cochran has written to MN DOT conveying the
committee comments on the EIS. A copy of the letter was distrib-
uted to the Board.
Hurt said the Environment Committee's next meeting will be
3/9/93.
MOTION: Hurt moved, Reese seconded, to approve the Environment
Committee minutes of 1/12/93 as submitted.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
B. Eurasian Water Milfoil (EViM) Task Force, Chair Penn
1) Approval of Minutes of 12/18/92 and 1/22/93
MOTION: Hurr moved, Grathwol seconded, to approve the minutes of
the 12/18/92 and 1/22/93 meetings of the Eurasian Water Milfoil
Task Force, as submitted.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
LMCD BOARD OF DIRECTORS January 27. 1993
2. DNR Experimental Design for Sonar Testing
Penn called attention to the Scientific Subcommittee review
and recommendations regarding 8onar. The Scientific Subcommittee
was formed to give the EWM Task Force objective feedback on the
use of Sonar to treat EWM on Lake Minnetonka. The subcommittee
reached consensus that there is not good scientific evidence on
how to determine the proper dosage of Sonar. A methodology must
be established.
The minutes of the January meeting contain information on
how Field Enclosures might be, used to conduct test treatments,
and Whole Lake Treatment considerations. St. Alban's Bay is
' being considered for a field enclosure test application. Howev-
er, neither the DNR nor the Scientific Subcommittee finds St.
Alban's Bay meets the criteria for a whole lake treatment.
Reese indicated an interest in proceeding with Sonar treat-
ment in St. Alban's Bay. Penn said the assessment of the Scien-
tific Subcommittee to proceed slowly has to be considered.
1993 Harvesting Operations Penn reported he, the execu-
tive director and Robert Pierce have met to make plans for the
1993 season. The program will be presented at the February Board
meeting. Pierce's service as the harvesting Project Manager is
under consideration. He will focus on planning and coordination.
Pierce would work with a supervisor on the Lake. Equipment
repairs are complete. Auxiliary fuel tanks are being considered
for the harvesters. Harvest operators and two persons for daily
access clean up are planned.
Penn called attention to a Letter to the Editor he has sent
to the Excelsior SUN-SAILOR in response to a letter from the Lake
Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association (LMLOA). The letter
invites the LMLOA to actively participate in the Task Force
deliberations.
READING OF BOARD MINUTES. Reese moved, Penn seconded, to approve
the minutes of the 12/2/92 Board meeting as submitted. Motion
carried unanimously.
2. WATER STRUCTURES COMMITTEE, Cochran for Babcock.
A. Approval of Minutes. Carlson moved, Grathwol seconded,
to approve the minutes of the Water Structures Committee meeting
of 1/9/93, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Non-encased Molded Polystyrene Foam Prohibited in Float-
ing Structures.
MOTION: Grathwol moved, Penn seconded, to direct the LMCD attor-
ney to prepare an Ordinance Prohibiting Use of Molded Expanded
Bead Polystyrene Foam for floating structures in Lake Minnetonka,
as recommended by the Water Structures Committee in the draft
dated 1/20/93.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
I I I
LMCD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
January 27, 1993
C. Special Density Licenses
The Board received a proposed Ordinance relating to Special
Density licensed docks which are not constructed within a speci-
fied time.
MOTION: Grathwol moved. Hurt seconded, to approve the first
reading of the amendment to Section 2.05, Subd. 8 of the LMCD
Code regarding the renewal of licensed multiple docks with a
Special Density License which have not been constructed in a two
year period, as submitted.
DISCUSSION: LeFevere explained that the amendment declares the
Special Density license abandoned if the facilities are not
constructed within any two year period after the license is
issued.
Babcock arrived
Reese asked for a further explanation of the 11/30/93 effec-
tive date. Babcock said the purpose was to allow existing Spe-
cial Density License holders the 1993 boating season for con-
struction of the docks.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
D. Length Variances for Docks.
MOTION: Grathwol moved, Cochran seconded, to approve the first
reading of an Ordinance Amending LMCD Code Section 1.07, Subdivi-
sion 3; Relating to Length Variances for Docks and Section 2.01,
Subdivision 2; Relating to Dock Use Areas, as submitted.
DISCUSSION: At Cochran's request LeFevere explained that the
second section of the amendment provides for an automatic exten-
sion of the dock use area, without a variance, in the case of
very small lots to a maximum of 60' long. If 60' is not enough
the dock owner would have to apply for a variance to extend
further.
VOTE: Motion carried, Rascop voting nay.
E. Fee Resolution Draft
The Board received a proposed Resolution setting application
fees for licenses for multiple docks or mooring areas, commercial
docks, and launching ramps, for district mooring areas; for deic-
ing; for special density: for variances; and for permanent docks,
superseding Resolution #76. The proposed Resolution contains a
definition of how Watercraft Storage Units (WSU) are measured.
MOTION: Babcock moved, Grathwol seconded, to approve adoption of
Resolution #86, superseding Resolution #76, as submitted.
DISCUSSION: Hurr said the original purpose of the WSU was to
measure the density and size of boats at a dock. LeFevere re-
plied that when recodification was done there was a split into
Boat Storage Units (BSU) and WSUs. BSUs are used to specify
places where boats will be stored, and for a boat count. The WSUs
-continued
LMCD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
January 27, 1993
provide for calculating fees based on slip size. lturr feels WSUs
should be used to keep track of boat sizes, as well as to figure
fees. Babcock said there is a Code provision for grandfathered
locations, prohibiting increases in slip sizes.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
F. Lake Minnetonka Dredging Joint Policy Statement.
MOTION: Babcock moved, Grathwol seconded, to approve the Lake
Minnetonka Dredging Joint Policy Statement between the MN DNR,
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the LMCD with the
recommended changes of the Water Structures Committee and Envi-
ronment Committee, outlined in Memo dated 1/22/93.
DISCUSSION: Cochran suggested a change in II. Definitions
"Multiple-User Mooring" to indicate "Multiple User Channel, not
from the same lot".
Rascop moved to table the Statement back to the Water Struc-
tures Committee. There was no second.
LeFevere had recommended that the LMCD not be a signator
since the statement called for inclusion in the LMCD ordinances.
With the Ordinance reference deletion from the statement there is
no problem with the LMCD signing the statement, he said.
Babcock amended his motion to include the change in the
definition relating to "Multiple User Moorings", substituting
"Multiple User Channels", with the chair to work out the final
language of the definition.
Hurt commended the committee for its recommendation regard-
ing on-site inspections.
VOTE: Motion, as amended, carried unanimously.
G. Carlson Real Estate Co. Dredging Permit Application
The Board received a copy of the recommendations of the
Water Structures Committee sent to Ceil Strauss, DNR Division of
Waters on 1/12/93, after its review of the Carlson Real Estate
Company Protected Waters Permit Application #93-6103 dated
12/11/92.
Carlson introduced Jay Blake, Planner, City of Minnetrista.
Blake displayed a drawing showing the area to be dredged and
explained the city's preparation of an Environmental Assessment
Worksheet. The city determined no Environmental Impact Statement
was required. The dredging application is being reviewed by the
DNR and MCWD. Blake stated the application is for a channel the
same size as one approved in 1959. The spoils will be placed
upland. There will be no filling of wetlands. There will be a
change in the wetland classifications, but not a loss of wet-
lands. The developer and engineer are to bring in a site plan of
the development for city approval. There is no dock plan at this
time. Blake said the city will support LMCD rules.
Rascop said it is his understanding that spoils from dredg-
ing should not be deposited in the same watershed as pollutants
will find their way back into ~ho--w~l-l--fin~d-'their way-back into
the Lake. - continued
I, I~ I
LMCD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
January 27~ 1993
Richard Sathre, Sathre-Bergquist, Inc., Engineers, said they are
continuing to work on a plan of dikes and fencing which will
contain the spoils for drying.
Rascop asked about the mitigation of wetland loss. Sathre
said there is no intent to lose any wetlands. There were com-
ments from Board members about whether a conversion of wetlands
to open water would classify as a retention of wetlands.
Penn asked for the justification of a 70' wide channel.
Sathre said the purpose is allow room for two way traffic and
mooring on one side.
Blake explained the application is for a new dredging permit
at the request of the DNR rather than a maintenance permit. The
reason is to be sure all affected and interested parties are
given notice.
Carlson said the city is anxious to see this development
proceed as this area is where growth in Minnetrista will occur.
Dredging the channel is important to this development.
Maps Blake showed the Board the computerized mapping the
City has prepared as a part of its comprehensive plan review.
Penn commended the City of Minnetrista on their efforts to pro-
tect the environment.
DISCUSSION OF APPLICATION: The Board continued to discuss the
recommendations of the Water Structures Committee stated in the
1/12/93 letter to the DNR Division of Waters.
Babcock said it is important that the applicant meet the
newly developed standards for dredging. Penn questioned the need
for two way traffic in the channel. Bloom recommended taking a
stand not to allow any dredging beyond 15' bottom width and 5'
deep. He does not believe it is necessary to have a channel wide
enough to handle any size boat. He opposes returning to the 1959
size. Bloom said there has been a lot learned since 1959 about
preserving wetlands.
MOTION: Bloom moved, Markus seconded, to confirm the LMCD com-
mittee recommendations in the letter of 1/12/93 to the DNR,
recommending the..DNR and MCWD hold to current dredging policy
standards as stated in the letter.
DISCUSSION Rascop asked for an additional comment that any
wetlands removed be mitigated. There should be no net loss of
wetlands. Babcock added there should be no net loss of wetlands,
noting the change in classification mentioned by Blake.
Reese said he believes the motion is too restrictive. He
would be inclined to accept what the City of btinnetrista would
approve. He said this is a quality development to be encouraged.
Hurr observed that the newly adopted dredging policy state-
ment allows for dredging to 5' for multiple user channels. Bab-
cock asked for a consensus on the 5' suggested by the committee.
Cochran said the 3:1 side slopes are appropriate for a mud bottom
channel.
MOTION: Bloom moved, Babcock seconded, to call the question.
Motion carried, Carlson, Reese and Babcock voting nay.
VOTE ON ORIGINAL MOTION: Motion carried, Hurr, Reese, Carlson
and Babcock voting nay.
LMCD BOARI) OF DIRECTORS January 27, 1993
11. Expiration, as of 1/22/93, of the Interim Ordinance #115
Restricting Licensing, Construction and Maintenance of Certain
Commercial and Multiple Docks Requiring Special Density Licenses.
Babcock noted the moratorium on construction of commercial
and multiple docks requiring a Special Density License expired
1/22/93. No action was taken.
I. Combined Dock Use Area Ordinance
Babcock reported the committee dropped the proposed amend-
ment to Code Sect. 2.01, Subd. 3, Common Use of Adjacent Dock Use
Area.
3. LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE, Cochran for Chair Foster
A. Approval of Minutes. Grathwol moved, Penn seconded to
approve the Lake Use and Recreation Committee minutes of 1/25/93
as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
g. Quiet Waters Area in Halsted's Bay.
MOTION: Grathwol moved, Penn seconded, to waive the third read-
ing and approve Ordinance Amending Code Sect. 3.02, Establishing
a Quiet Waters Area in Halsted's Bay and to authorize publica-
tion.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
C. Water Patrol Special Deputy Award.
MOTION: Rascop moved, Grathwol seconded, to approve the commit-
tee recommendation to give the Water Patrol Special Deputy Award
to Paul Botnen at the 1993 Save the Lake Recognition Banquet.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
D. Special Events
The Board received a committee recommendation that an Ordi-
nance change be prepared which would allow the LMCD staff to
issue new as well as renewal Special Event Licenses.
It was the consensus of the Board that the attorney prepare
such a Code change, with a provision.for appeal upon a staff
denial.
E. Water Patrol Report
Deputy Shilling reported there were no changes in the Water
Patrol report filed with the committee on 1/25/93.
Shilling listed the following upcoming Special Events:
Ice Fishing Excursions. The sleigh has been inspected
and approved.
Lafayette Club Family Fishing Derby and Kite Fly - 2/7/93
Westonka Winter Fest - 2/13/93
Shilling said snowmobile activity is about the same as in
past years. That is not true all over the state where there is
an increase in activity.
: I I, ! I
LMCD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
January 27, 1993
Bloom expressed concern about snowmobiles speeding on Crys-
tal Bay. Shilling said the Water Patrol staggers the locations
they observe and make selections randomly. Bloom asked that the
Water Patrol check out Crystal Bay between Bohn's Point and
Minnetonka Beach.
4. LAKE ACCESS COMMITTEE~ Chair Grathwol
A. Approval of Minutes. Grathwol moved, Bloofn seconded, to
approve the minutes of the LMCD Lake Access Committee, meeting of
1/25/93. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Lake Access Task Force, Agreements Subcommittee
Grathwol distributed a report of the 1/26/93 Agreements
Subcommittee meeting. He also distributed a sample Lake Access
Parking Agreement and checklist for evaluating Lake Minnetonka
Public Access Car/Trailer Parking Agreements.
Hurr objected to having only one agency sign the parking
agreement when there are over-lapping jurisdictions. Grathwol
said that is an appropriate remark and will be considered as the
agreements are finalized.
Markus asked about the use of commercial parking lots which
are underused. Carlson said the DNR advises against using space
that is temporary.
Grathwol said the Task Force met in January and established
sub-committees. He envisions that between now and 4/15/93 350
car/trailer parking spaces will be qualified per the new parking
standards.
Grathwol reported that the Task Force is focusing on a site
in Shorewood which will bring the DNR into some kind of relation-
ship for its use, short of ownership.
Hurr informed the Board that the City of Orono is not satis-
fied with the activities of the Lake Access Task Force. Rascop
expressed the hope that Orono will stay involved in the Task
Force. Markus indicated he was not familiar with the source of
Orono's dissatisfaction. Hurr offered to have the city write a
letter to the LMCD. Carlson said he would not recommend a formal
communication. He would prefer informal discussion to avoid
polarizing any position. Hurr has encouraged the new members of
the Orono council to become familiar with the issues and suggests
they discuss it with LMCD members.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE, Chair Carlson
A. Approval of Minutes. Carlson moved, Reese seconded, to
approve the minutes of the 1/7/93 meeting of the LMCD Administra-
tive Committee, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Computerization Progress
Carlson reported the payroll and accounts payable are up and
working on the computer. General Operations, Eurasian Water
Milfoil and Save the Lake are the main accounting cateoories
LMCD BOARD OF I)IRECTORS January 27, 1993
C. Staff Cost Accounting Procedures
Carlson said the committee agreed to use Water Structures,
Lake Use. and Environment' committees, and General Administration
for time and cost tracking purposes. Those categories will be
broken down into sub-categories as outlined in tile minutes.
D. Fee Study Subcommittee
The minutes of the Fee Study subcommittee meeting of 1/21/93
were presented. Carlson, Cochran, Strommen and Thibault repre-
sented the LMCD. Gabriel Jabbour, Tonka Bay Marina, Paul Peder-
son, 6ray's Bay Marina and Jerry Rockvam, Rockvam Boat Yard
represented the multiple dock licensees (MDR). The subcommittee
agreed that cost data must be gathered for a full year before a
meaningful assessment of various costs carl be determined. The
next meeting will be 3/9/93.
Cochran pointed out that the MDRs would accept some percent-
age of costs under Items 5 - 8 on the Statement of Purpose. if
these would be identified in advance so as to limit the cost
exposure multiple dock licensees might incur in the future. He
said the MDRs need assurance that there will be a cap on costs.
E. Staggered Terms for Directors
Carlson called attention to the list of directors who have
already arranged to have their terms started on a new schedule.
changing from the 1992-1994 terms. In order to reach the recom-
mended staggering of terms 5, 5. and 4 over a three year period
it will be necessary for other members to volunteer a change.
Markus volunteered a 1994-1996 term. Penn volunteered to serve
1993-1995. It was said Foster has agreed to 1993-1995.
LeFevere pointed out that any change in terms has to be
approved by the appointing city.
F. Performance Reviews and Compensation Recommendations
Carlson submitted Executive Director Strommen's personnel
review and recommendations regarding Rachel Thibault, Administra-
tive Technician. He also presented a revised position descrip-
tion for the Administrative Technician classification.
MOTION: Rascop moved, Carlson seconded, to approve a 4% salary
increase for Rachel Thibault, effective 1/1/93.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
Carlson submitted the performance evaluation for Eugene
Strommen.
MOTION: Cochran moved, Penn seconded, to approve a 5% salary
increase for Eugene Strommen, effective 1/1/93.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
Strommen expressed his appreciation at being able to serve
the LMCD to a mutual benefit.
LMCD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
January 27, 1993
G. Exotic Control
Markus said he has heard Conservation Officers have suggest-
ed a quarantine on the St. Croix River to prevent boats coming in
from the Mississippi River. Strommen said the governing authori-
ties determined there is no practical way to do that.
FINANCIAL REPORTS, Treasurer Carlson
A. November and December Statements of Cash Transactions
B. Audit of Vouchers for Payment
Carlson presented the November and December statements of
Cash Transactions and the list of checks for approval.
Reese asked about the following, with explanations from
Carlson:
#8976 to Steven M. Tallen for Legal Fees and #9027 to Steven
M. Tallen for Prosecutions. It was explained both billings are
for prosecutions.
#8972 to IRS for tax penalty. It was explained the penalty
resulted from a payroll period which exceeded the maximum in
July, 1992, due to the milfoil payroll.
#8999 to Hennepin County for room and board. It was ex-
plained those are jail charges.
MOTION: Carlson moved, Reese seconded, to approve payment of
bills in the amount of $57,543.69, checks #8960 - 9038 and pay-
roll checks #1002 - 1009.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT, Strommen
A. 1993 Staff Objectives
The executive director presented the administrative staff
objectives for 1993 for the Board's consideration. It is his
expectation that these are to be prioritized relative to the Man-
agement Plan.
Strommen said there may be a need for contract technical
services to implement some of the items, particularly in the
environment area and lake use analysis of data.
Strommen said the staff recommendations include an emphasis
on getting reports to the public, various media and other agen-
cies. There was a release to the media this week on proper
operation of snowmobiles and other vehicles on the lake.
Cochran challenged the committee Chairs to prepare a "to do"
list of committee objectives.
Hurt asked for an announcement on the next Environment
Committee meeting of 3/9 at which Ed Ficke of the DNR will speak
on the shoreland rules.
LMCI) BOARD OF I)IRISCTORS January 27, 1993
B. Auditor
Strommen recommended Babcock, Langbein and Co., per its
proposal, to conduct the FY 1992 audit at a rate not to exceed
$800.00.
MOTION: Carlson moved, Rascop seconded, approval of the services
of Babcock, Langbein and Co. for preparation of the FY 1992
audit.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
C. Contract Extension - Steven J. Prestin
Strommen asked for approval of a contract extension for tile
services of Steven J. Prestin to continue service on Shoreland
Rules Adoption and conduct of the Technical Review Committee.
MOTION: Rascop moved, Hurt seconded, to extend the current
contract with Steven J. Prestin from 12/31/92 to 6/30/93 under
the same terms and conditions.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
D. Lake Access Task Force Facilitator - Donald Buckhout
Strommen presented an interagency agreement between the MN
DNR and the LMCD for the services of Donald Buckhout who has
served as a facilitator for the Lake Access Task Force since June
15, 1992. The agreement calls for an increase in hourly rate
verbally offered in June from $25 to $30.
Hurt asked for a justification of the use of a facilitator
for the Task Force when it is not done for any other committee.
Responding to a question from Babcock, Strommen said Buckh-
out is an employee of the ~N DNR, made available on an independ-
ent contract basis. It is the DNR's desire to have a formal
agreement for his services, and they asked for the $30 rate.
Rascop said he is not comfortable with the arrangement. He
has had criticism from a Shorewood councilmember. Rascop would
like to do without the position.
Carlson observed that trying to get 100% consensus of the
Task Force was not working. Since reaching an 80% majority
agreement for action, it should work well.
MOTION: Hurr moved, Reese seconded, to have the Administrative
Committee review the need and hourly cost for this position
before signing an agreement.
DISCUSSION: Babcock suggested getting feedback from the Lake
Access Task Force.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
E. Other Business
Meeting Schedule. The executive director distributed the
February meeting schedule. Carlson noted the Fee Study subcom-
mittee meeting shown for February 9 should be March 9.
LMCD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
January 27, 1993
Pay Equity Act. The executive director informed the Board
that the LMCD has been recognized for compliance with the Local
Government Pay Equity Act.
Meeting Timing: Babcock asked that the LMCD Lake Access
committee schedule its meeting so it falls prior to the Lake
Access Task Force meetings.
Cochran reported he, along with Hurt and the executive
director, will attend a meeting sponsored by the Environmental
Quality Board on Sustainable Development Initiatives in St. Paul.
Jan. 29, 1993.
ADJOURNMENT
Cochran declared the meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
David Cochran, Chair
Douglas Babcock, Secretary
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 8, 1993
Those present were: Chair Bill Meyer, Commissioners Geoff Michael,
Frank Weiland, Michael Mueller, Jerry Clapsaddle, Mark Hanus, and
Brian Johnson, City Council Representative Liz Jensen, Building
Official Jon Sutherland, and Secretary Peggy James. Commissioner
Bill Voss was absent and excused.
The following people were also in attendance:
Ahrens, Ken Smith, and John Page.
John Gabos, Andrea
MINUTES
The Planning Commission Minutes of January 25, 1993 were presented
for approval.
Mueller referred to page 3 of the minutes, the definition for "Lot,
Lakeshore," and noted that what the Planning Commission suggested
is different than what is shown on page 31 of the January 26, 1993
City Council Minutes. It was clarified that "with the exception of
designated parks" was added to the amended definition. The
Commission expressed a concern about the impact this change may
have on existing and/or future parcels which abut parks. It was
determined that this topic would be discussed later in the meeting.
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Weiland to approve
the Planning Commission Minutes of January 25, 1993 as
written. Motion carried unanimously.
CASE ~93-001: JOHN GABOB, 4687 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, LOT 19 & NWLY
.1/2 OF 18, BLOCK 1, D~¥ON, PID $30-117-23 22 0009. VARIANCE.
Building Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicant's request
to add a deck, railing, and stairway onto an existing nonconforming
boat house. The boat house is nonconforming due to a nonconforming
zero foot side yard setback and a 1.3 foot rear yard setback. The
required setbacks to both the side and rear lot lines is 4 feet.
The proposed expansion is inconsistent with the current code. It
is the intent of the pending Shoreland Management Regulations not
to allow boat houses to occur within the 50 foot setback and that
is consistent with the majority of other Minnetonka lakeshore
communities.
Staff recommended that the request not be approved and that further
consideration should be given to allow a guardrail to be installed
on the north side to keep people off the boat house. The Building
Official displayed on the overhead projector a drawing of his
suggestion which showed a guardrail along the northeast side of the
Planning Comuission Minutes February 8, 1993
boat house, where the grade is such that access is more easily
obtained.
Mueller questioned the Building Official if, in his opinion, the
deck will extend the life of the structure. The'Building Official
stated "no."
Applicant, John Gabos, addressed the commission stating that the
primary reason for the request is one of safety. He explained that
the neighbor children have been climbing on it and he does not want
someone to fall off and get hurt. He also believes that a railing
all the way around would look better and be in harmony with the
architecture in the neighborhood. He and his neighbors would
prefer to look at a deck with a railing on top of the boat house
rather than just a partial railing which would look unfinished.
Planning Commission discussion prompted the following comments and
suggestions:
A railing presents a challenge for children to climb over it,
therefore, it may be better to have the railing all the way
around.
The roof is already being used as a deck, the railing and deck
boards would enhance the existing use and make it more safe.
A hip roof may keep the kids off but it could also extend the
life of the structure.
- It is reasonable to allow the deck and guardrail.
Nonconformities should not grow. Will neighbors object when
there is a table with an umbrella on the deck blocking their
view of the lake?
Kids climb trees and fall from them, but we don't cut them
down.
Allow deck and railing and make accessible by constructing
stair at northeast side, shallow side.
The existing structure will be around for a long time, the
deck will improve its appearance. If only a partial rail is
allowed it would look unfinished.
- Allow guardrail but no deck, this would detract its use.
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8, 1993
If only guardrail is allowed and no deck, people may use
anyway and may fall through roof. Wood deck should be allowed
if guardrail is allowed.
In the late 1970's/early 1980's a rainstorm washed out the
hillside and an existing boat house. As a result, the boat
house was allowed to be reconstructed.
Grade could be dropped surrounding the boat house to prevent
access to the roof.
- Safety is issue, not appearance.
The purpose of a railing is to prevent people from falling
off, not to keep people out.
If structure was located a few feet over, the variance would
not be required.
Shrubbery could be planted along the northeast side of the
structure to block access. It was noted that shrubbery would
also block the view to the roof to see if kids were on it.
MOTION made by Ranus, seconded by Clapsaddle to recommend
approval of construction of a wooden deck, wooden
railing, a closeable gate, and a stairway of minimum
size. Motion failed 3 - 5. Those in favor were: Hanus,
Clapsaddle and Mueller. Those opposed were: Johnson,
Weiland, meyer, Michael, and Jensen.
The Commission agreed to continue discussion, and it was noted that
everyone is in favor of some type of a railing. Meyer suggested
the applicant work with the Building Official to address the safety
issue.
MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Clapsaddle to
recommend approval of a guardrail around the full
perimeter of the roof, as approved by the Building
Official. No deck or gates. Motion failed 3 to 5.
Those in favor were Weiland, Johnson and Meyer. Those
opposed are as follows with their reasons:
Clapsaddle: Motion is unnecessary and restricts the
solution. The applicant should be able to work with the
City Council on a solution.
Mueller: It will not enhance the property or the
neighbors view to allow only a guardrail.
Planning Commission Minutes Februar~ 8, 1993
Hanus: Just a guardrail will add to an ugly situation,
it is not the answer. The appearance needs to be
addressed.
Michael: The issue was already voted on, and the City
Council should hear what was voted.
Jensen: A guardrail around the entire perimeter of the
roof goes beyond the minimum variance to alleviate the
hardship, and she is not sure what the hardship is. The
railing around the entire structure would be more than
what is necessary to alleviate the safety issue.
MOTION made by Clapsaddle, seconded by Mueller to forward
this request to the City Council on the basis of the vote
for the first motion. Motion carried unanimously.
This case will be reviewed by the City Council on February 9, 1993.
~ASE ~93-003; JOHN & JANET PAGE, 1927 L~KESIDE LANE, LOT 10, BLOCK
!1~ SHADYWOOD POINT~ PID ~18-117-23 23 0056. VARIANCE.
Building Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicant's request
for a variance to construct a second story addition, entry, and an
additional garage stall. The request includes the following
variances:
Requested Required Variance
Proposed Front Setback 7.6'
Existing Front Setback 9'
Existing North Side 4'
Existing South Side 4.9'
Existing Lot Area 8,450
Existing Street Frontage 50.5'
30' 22.4'
30' 21'
6' 2'
10' 5.1'
10,000 1,550
60' 9.5'
The second story addition and entry enhances the use and improves
the livability of the property with only a slight reduction of the
front yard in that area. The proposed total hardcover on the lot
will be less than the 30 percent as proposed in the zoning code
modifications. The existing structure footprint precludes any
other reasonable location for expansion of the garage. Lack of off
street parking is a concern.
Staff commented that it is difficult to find hardship in this case,
however, it was recommended that if the Planning Commission finds
that a practical difficulty exists and that it is reasonable to
allow the variances requested, staff would recommend that proper
drainage be provided from the front and sides of the property to
4
Planning Co~ission Minutes
February 8, 1993
avoid any problem with the abutting properties.
The applicant, John Page, spoke on his behalf and stated that there
is always a car parked where the additional garage stall is
proposed anyway.
The Commission's comments indicated that they were in favor of
additional garage space, however, there was concern that the 27.5
foot width as requested was not a minimum, and if the width was
reduced to 22 or 24 feet it would reduce the variance towards the
street due to the angle of the lot line and the structure. The
Commission was not concerned with the proposed second story
addition.
Major concern was expressed regarding the short driveway with the
garage doors facing the street. It was suggested that the garage
doors be turned to face the side property line.
MOTION made by Hanus, seconded by Clapsaddle to recommend
approval of the variances as requested with the exception
that the garage not exceed 24' wide and 22' deep.
The Commission discussed that allowing a 24' wide garage exceeds
the minimum, and that a 22' x 22' garage should be required.
Clapsaddle questioned the difference of 2 feet and commented that
the visual impact of allowing two more feet is very minimal.
Mueller spoke in favor of requiring the garage doors to face the
side property line.
Hanus moved to amend his motion to limit the size of the
garage to 22' x 22'. Clapsaddle withdrew his second.
Michael seconded the amended motion.
The Planning Commission discovered through further discussion that
if the garage doors were required to face the side lot line, and
only a 22' garage is allowed it would eliminate any possibility for
an entry addition. The applicant emphasized the importance of the
entry/breezeway to the Commission. Clapsaddle noted that if the
garage was allowed to extend 2 more feet towards the front lot line
this would allow for the breezeway addition. The Commission
discussed the appearance of this option and commented that if there
was a strip of green space with some shrubs between the garage and
the front lot line it would be more aesthetically pleasing than
having it all paved.
Hanus withdrew his previous motion. Michael seconded the
withdrawal.
Planning Commission Minutes February 8, 1993
MOTION made by Hanus, seconded by Michael to recommend
approval of the variances, as requested, to allow
construction of the proposed second story addition,
entry/breezeway addition, and expansion of the existing
qarage. The garage doors shall face the south side lot
line and the garage shall be limited to 24 feet wide and
22 feet deep. Finding of fact= This suggested plan for
the garage will eliminate cars from hanging over into the
right-of-way when parked in the driveway and will benefit
the current floor plan to accommodate a breezeway.
Motion carried 8 to 1. Those in favor were: Meyer,
Michael, Clapsaddle, Hanus, Mueller, ross, Weiland, and
Jensen. Johnson opposed.
Johnson commented that increasing a variance to the front lot line
is giving the wrong message.
This case will be heard by the City Council on February 23, 1993.
~RUTH IN HOUSING REVIEW
Subcommittee Chair, Mueller, related to the Commission the status
of the proposed Truth in Housing Ordinance. The Subcommittee has
thoroughly reviewed the Housing sections, however, the Building
Official has indicated that he has some comments on the Housing
portion of the evaluators guide. The Subcommittee has not had the
opportunity to review the finished draft of the Zoning portion, but
it was determined that this could be done with the entire
commission. Mueller emphasized the need to reduce the length of
the zoning portion, and at the same time maintain the pertinent
information.
The Commission reiterated that the ordinance is for comparison
purposes only, not code compliance. It was noted that the buyer
will benefit from this ordinance.
Michael sensed some uncertainty from the Commission about adopting
the ordinance and commented that he thought all the Commissioners
were in favor of this type of ordinance. Michael addressed Hanus
and asked him, if as a citizen, was he going to write letters to
the paper opposing this ordinance, and if so, he would recommend
that Hanus step down during discussions on this issue because it is
not fair to the rest of the Planning Commission.
Hanus commented that he would have no problem stepping down,
however, he still feels he can offer the same input that he has
always offered, he is somewhat against the ordinance as a whole
anyway and so he does not have a problem stepping down if that is
what the Commission would like. Meyer did not think it was
Planning Commission Minutes February 8, 1993
necessary for him to step down.
Hanus commented that he is separating the political side of the
ordinance versus the job that has to be done. He is trying to do
job that has to be done. The political side is a completely
different issue, and those are his own personal opinions.
Hanus confirmed that he is comfortable working on the ordinance and
that he would not necessarily vote against it to get it passed onto
the Council. It does not mean that he is in favor of the ordinance
as an ordinance, it means he is in favor because it is the best the
Planning Commission can do. Meyer does not see any problem with
Hanus working on the ordinance.
Michael stated that he would have a problem in that it would be
annoying to him if he saw a letter to the editor asking for a whole
lot of support one way or the other by Hanus as a concerned citizen
because that is political, and this has already happened. Mueller
asked if Michael would have the same concerns if he, as a citizen
and a Realtor, wrote a letter to the editor in strong support of
passing the ordinance. Michael commented that Mueller is not
running for City Council and would not be writing the letter to
garner votes, and that he was merely considering the negative
impact, and if the rest of the Commission does not have a problem,
that is fine. None of the other Commissioner's expressed strong
feelings one way or the other.
The Commission recollected the reasons for implementing this type
of ordinance. Meyer commented that it is to help people be aware
of what they are buying, both by a zoning standpoint and a housing
standpoint. Mueller reviewed that it was mandated by the
Metropolitan Council to improve the housing stock.
Evaluator's Guide - Housinq
Mueller reviewed correlation between the Evaluator's Guide and
Disclosure Report.
Johnson expressed a concern about items being marked as "Below
Minimum Standards" or "Hazardous." He commented that just because
a vent is "improper" does not mean it is necessarily "Hazardous."
Johnson commented that if you have an older house that does not
meet today's standards it will receive a "B" for "Below Minimum
Standards" and he would not agree with this. Mueller commented
that buyers become use to seeing this and it is common to see a
"B". A buyer may want these items brought up to code, but at least
a buyer will know that something does not meet current
requirements.
7
Pl&nn[n9 Commission Minutes February 8, 1993
Johnson referred to line f155 which relates to plumbing vents, and
states "if in an improper condition shall be noted as "Hazardous,,
on the disclosure form." Should this be "Below Minimum Standards,,
or "Hazardous,,? It was noted that this item was added by the
Plumbing Inspector, and not all the Commissioner,s agreed with
this. Other sections which require the item be marked as
"Hazardous,, for being "improper,, were reviewed.
It was noted that some items were duplicated under different
subheadings and it was questioned if these could be combined to
shorten the document.
Weiland suggested that within line 644 that the minimum required
number of fixtures should be listed.
Chair Meyer suggested that this issue be placed on every Planning
Commission meeting agenda until it is done.
ZONING ORDINANCE AM__~NDMENTS - LAKESHORE LOTU
The definition for "Lot, Lakeshore,, as recommended to be amended at
the City Council meeting of January 26, 1993 was reviewed. The
proposed definition reads as follows: "Lot, Lakeshore. A lot
abutting public waters or abutting public lands abutting public
waters with the exception of designated parks."
Concern was expressed that there may be more lots abutting
designated parks which abut public waters that we haven't
considered, Highland End park may not be the only one. And, what
if there is a future development that has a park between
residential lots and the lake which are or are not intended to be
considered lakeshore lots? What happens when the definition does
not fit all situations? It was suggested that the City Council
review the intent of the definition. Is it too black and white?
RENTAL HOUSING MAINTENANCE ORDINANC~
Mueller requested that the Planning Commission be provided with
copies of the minutes of the Rental Task Force meetings. The
Building Official agreed that this can be done, and he briefly
reviewed the status of the review by the task force.
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Weiland that the
Rental Task Force meeting minutes be included in the
Planning Commission packets. Motion carried unanimously.
I IJ I
Planning Commission Minutes
February 8, 1993
The meeting adjourned at 11~11 p.m.
Chair, Bill Meyer
Attest:
9
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PARK AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 11, 1993
Present were: Commissioners Lyndelle Skoglund, Brian Asleson, Tom
Casey, Marilyn Byrnes, Carolyn Schmidt, and Steve Kirshbaum; Parks
Director, Jim Fackler; City Planner, Mark Koegler; and Secretary,
Peggy James. Absent and excused were: Commissioners Mo Mueller
and Shirley Andersen; and Council Representative, Andrea Ahrens;
MINUTES
Tom Casey referred to page 4 of the minutes "Election of Officers,"
and stated that he nominated Lyndelle Skoglund, not Mo Mueller.
Asleson confirmed that he nominated Mo Mueller. The minutes were
corrected accordingly.
MOTION made by Asleson and seconded by Casey to approve
the Park and Open Space Commission Minutes of January 14,
1993 as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
NATURE CONSERVATION AREAS (NCA) PLAN
City Planner, Mark Koegler, handed out a draft section of the NCA
Plan entitled "Property Tax Implications." This section
illustrates the tax implications of NCA designation. Koegler
displayed some examples using existing tax forfeited parcels and
taking into consideration the status of the abutting property. If
the abutting property is undersized, and if combination of a tax
forfeit lot would alleviate the nonconformity of the undersized
lot, the value of the tax forfeit lot may increase.
In summary, the tax revenue to be gained by releasing these
properties would be minimal, and in considering the designation of
NCAs, property tax implications should not be a major factor in
decisions.
Koegler suggested that a parameter be added regarding the zoning
aspect, in that when a tax forfeit property can make an adjoining
property conforming in lot size it should be released. The burden
of maintaining a nonconforming/undersized lot was discussed.
Koegler summarized that when you have an undersized lot it can be
difficult to obtain title insurance and variances are required when
modifications to the structure are proposed. Casey questioned the
feasibility of placing a conservation easement on these parcels,
and Koegler agreed that it could be feasible and confirmed that
property with easements still counts for square footage when
determining lot area.
I J I
Park and Open Space Comm£ssion
February 11, 1993
Chair Skoglund suggested the Park Commission meet with the Planning
Commission to review the plan. Koegler agreed, and suggested that
a meeting be correlated when a complete draft is available.
Koegler requested more input from the Commission regarding
administration and maintenance. He questioned what the Park
Commission foresees in budget expenditures. For an example, in
1992 $15,000 was budgeted for tree removal on city property, the
actual was $19,000. What type of improvements or maintenance to an
NCA would be needed? The Commission's suggestions included the
following:
Tree removal and trimming.
Removal of noxious weeds (poison ivy).
Restoration of Lane.
Removal of debris.
Signage.
Pathway construction on maintenance.
Watering of new trees/plants.
Disposal costs.
Birdhouses.
Casey commented that Community Development Block Grants are
available for land restoration projects. Utilizing the Adopt a
Green Space Program was discussed.
Koegler asked the Commission if they would consider the amount of
public support to determine if a site should be retained as a NCA.
For example, if a neighborhood is willing to adopt the NCA, this
would be a benefit to a lower priority site, especially if the
neighborhood agreed to remove debris from the site or do plantings,
etc. The Commission agreed that this could be a determining factor
or a parameter depending on the quality of the site. It was
suggested that they solicit the neighbors for support.
Koegler informed the Commission that a full draft will be presented
for review at the next meeting. It was confirmed that a timeline
could also be discussed at the next meeting.
Request to be heard by Tom Case¥ reqarding Teal Pointe.
Commissioner Casey stepped down. Casey, acting as a representative
for the citizens regarding the proposed preliminary plat for Teal
Pointe, addressed the Commission in regards to the Environmental
Assessment Worksheet (EAW) that the City Council has required as a
condition of approval of the preliminary plat. Casey explained to
the Commission what an EAW is, and he emphasized that the
Commission should be concerned about the results of the EAW due to
the fact that "Outlot B", the surrounding wetlands, will be under
2
Park and Open Space Comm£ss£on February 11, 1993
their jurisdiction if the plat is approved. Casey stated that it
is proper for the Park Commission to review the EAW and suggested
that they request the Council to allow the Park Commission the
opportunity to review the EAW prior to their review.
MOTION made by Asleson to recommend to the City Council
that the Park and Open Space Commission be given an
opportunity to look at the EAW for Teal Pointe prior to
the City Council. Due to lack of a second, the motion
failed.
Asleson commented that if any Park Commissioners are interested in
the EAW from a personal standpoint they can come to the City to
look at it as it is public information.
Skoglund commented that she did not vote for the motion because she
feels that Casey is trying to get the Park Commission to make a
commitment to support, or oppose to the development. Casey
emphasized that this is not the reason.
MOTION made by Asleson to recommend to the City Council
that the Park and Open Space Commission be given the
opportunity to look at the EA# for Teal Pointe prior to
the City Council primarily to look at Outlot B which will
become City Property and to review the affects the
development may have on that land. Review of the EAW
will not require a recommendation by the Park and Open
Space Commission. Kirshbaum seconded the motion. Motion
failed 2 to 3. Those in favor were Asleson and
Kirshbaum. Those opposed were Skoglund, Byrnes, and
Schmidt.
Summer Parks Program.
Byrnes reported to the Commission that the subcommittee including
herself, Schmidt and Asleson met with Jim Glasoe regarding special
events in the parks. At the meeting it was determined that the 4th
Sunday of each month a special event would occur at Mound Bay Park.
An article will be published in the newspaper looking for local
talent such as music, puppet shows, etc.
The Parks Director suggested that on these days the depot be
reserved to avoid conflicts with private parties. Fackler
confirmed that there will be no charge for the depot.
Park and Open Space Commission
February 11, 1993
Letter from Minnetrista Park Commission regardinq future trail
development along the Dakota Rail line.
The Commission acknowledged the meeting scheduled for Tuesday,
April 13, 1993, 7:00 p.m. at Minnetrista City Hall to discuss this
issue.
Park Director's Report.
Jim Fackler reviewed with the Park Commission the playground
equipment that was ordered for Three Points Park. The purchase
price for this equipment totalled $12,885. The Commission
suggested that a picture of the new playground equipment be put in
the paper after its installation.
Fackler informed the Commission that the DNR had contacted him in
regards to their request to CORE for a fishing pier at Mound Bay
Park, however, they were more interested in considering Centerview
Beach for a fishing pier.
Dock 'Inspector's Report.
Tom McCaffrey informed the Commission that so far they have 22
people on a waiting list, and this is a high number for so early in
the season.
MOTION made by Skoglund, seconded by Casey to adjourn the
Park and Open Space Commission Meeting at 8:31 p.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
I I I
AWARD:
SALE:
SPRINGSTED
PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS
Home Office
85 East Seventh Place
Suite t00
Saint Paul, MN 55101-2143
(6].2) 223-3000
Fax: (612) 223-3002
222 South Ninth Street
Suite 2825
Minneapolis, MN 55402-3368
(612) 333-9177
Fax: (612) 333-2363
16655 West Bluemound Road
Suite 290
8rookfield, WI 53005-5935
(414) 782-8222
Fax: (414) 782-2904
6800 College Boulevard
Suite 600
Overland Park, KS 66211-1533
(913) 345-8062
Fax: (913) 345-1770
1800 K Street NW
Suite 83t
Washington, DC 20006-2200
(202) 466-3344
$790,000* Fax: (202) 223-1362
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993A
FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
February 23, 1993
Moody's Rating: A
Standard & Poor's Rating: A
Bidder
Interest Net Interest True Interest
Rates Price Cost Rate
FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
COMMERCE BANK OF KANSAS CITY
PIPER JAFFRAY INC.
FIRSTAR BANK MILWAUKEE, N.A.
.~MOORE, JURAN AND COMPANY,
INCORPORATED
4.10% 2000
4.30% 2001
4.50% 20O2
4.60% 2003
4.70% 2004
4.20% 2000
4.35% 2001
4.50% 2002
4.60% 2003
4.70% 2004
4.20% 2000
4.35% 2001
4.50% 2002
4.65% 2003
4.80% 2004
4.375%
4.40%
4.50%
4.60%
4.20%
4.35%
4.50%
4.65%
4.80%
2000
2001
2002
2003-2004
2000
2001
2002
2003
2O04
$784,075.00 $342,401.25 4.5565%
$785,102.00 $343,312.17 4.5662%
$785,070.40 $345,901.48 4.5996%
$782,170.65 $347,382.37 4.6327%
$783,087.50 $347,884.37 4.6327%
(Continued)
Interest Net Interest True Interest
Bidder Rates Price Cost Rate
PARK INVESTMENT CORPORATION 4.20% 2000 $782,100.00 $348,279.69 4.6421 ¢
4.40% 2001
4.50% 2002
4.625% 2003
4.75% 2004
DOUGHERTY, DAWKINS, STRAND &
BIGELOW, INCORPORATED
CRONIN & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
SMITH BARNEY, HARRIS UPHAM &
COMPANY INCORPORATED
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK SAINT PAUL
DAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED
NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL, INC.
4.20% 2000
4.40% 2001
4.50% 20O2
4.65% 2003
4.8O% 2004
4.20% 2000
4.40% 2001
4.55% 2002
4.70% 2003
4.85% 2004
4.20% 2000
4.40% 2001
4.55% 2O02
4.70% 2003
4.85% 2004
4.25% 2000
4.45% 2001
4.60% 2002
4.70% 2003
4.80% 2004
4.20% 2000
4.4O% 2001
4.60% 2002
4.75% 2003
4.90% 2004
4.30% 2000
4.50% 2001
4.65% 2002
4.75% 2O03
4.85% 2004
4.50% 2000-2001
4.60% 2002
4.75% 2003-2004
$783,048.00 $348,610.54 4.6427%
$783,522.00 $350,592.17 4.6669%
$782,890.00 $351,224.17 4.6775%
$783,292.90 $352,031.47 4.6879%
$783,996.00 $352,573.79 4.6910%
$783,680.00 $355,412.29 4.7316%
$783,113.30 $355,977.33 4.7436%
These Bonds are being reoffered at par.
BBI: 5.P~
Average Maturity: 9.54 Ye,
Subsequent to bid opening, the issue size was increased to $795,000. The 2000 maturity was increased by $5,000 to
$170,000..