The URL can be used to link to this page

1993-04-13I B CFF~ OF MOUND W~SS~ON b*rATEMENT; The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community. AGENDA CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA MOUND CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, APRIl. 13, 1993 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. (NOTE: On Tuesday April 6, we were presented a new flag for the Council Chambers by American Legion Post #398 & the Auxiliary. It is the 200th flag that the Post & Auxiliary have issued to the City since 1983. Also, a plaque commemorating the flag presentation is in the display case in the hallway.) APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 23, 1993, REGULAR MEETING. PG. 1137-1146 PUBLIC HEARING: CASE #93-006: CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN OPEN SALES LOT AT HARRISON BAY MOBIL, 4831 SHORELINE DRIVE, IN THE B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT. PG. 1147-1166 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR THE CDBG PROGRAM - CONTRACT #A07483. PG. 1167-1179 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYORAND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE 1993 MUNICIPAL RECYCLING GRANT AGREEMENT. PG. 1180 COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT. RECEIPT OF PETITION TO ESTABLISH "NO PARKING" ON HANOVER ROAD. PG. 1181-1182 BID AWARD: 1993 SEALCOAT PROJECT. PG. 1183-1185 1134 · Ik, i 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. RESOLUTION GRANTING A WAIVER TO TRIAX CABLEVISION REGARDING THE SIGNAL CARRIAGE OF METRO CABLE NETWORKS (REGIONAL CHANNEL 6) IN THE CITY OF MOUND CABLE SERVICE TERRITORY. REVISION OF WETLANDS ORDINANCE MAP FOR AREA #8 (SAUNDERS LAKE) TO MATCH THE OHW ELEVATION OF 943.6 AS USED BY THE DNR. LICENSE APPROVALS - - HAWKER'S LICENSE - GAMES OF SKILL - RESTAURANT - BOWLING - AMUSEMENT DEVICES (JUKE BOX) - POOL TABLES PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT - MOHAWK JAYCEES (PLEASE WAIVE FEE) - MAY 8, 1993. REQUEST FROM DENNIS E. ERICKSON, 2424 AVON DRIVE RE: WAIVING OF PARK DEDICATION FEE AS IT RELATES TO MINOR SUBDIVISION. PAYMENT OF BILLS. INFORMATION/MISCEL?.a_NEOUS Bo F® Department Head Monthly Reports for March 1993. L.M.C.D. Representative,s Monthly Report for March 1993. Tom Reese has requested a few minutes on next week's COW Meeting Agenda. ' L.M.C.D. Mailings. Mailing from Lake Minnetonka Multiple Docks Owners Association re: Committee work in studying LMCD expenses as they pertain to issuing and monitoring multiple dock licenses. Information re: CDBG Program - Rehabilitation of Private Property. Letter from Donald J. Borut, Executive Director, National League of Cities, (NLC) thanking the Mayor and City Council for assistance in shaping a national economic recovery program. PG. 1186-1190 PG. 1191-1194 PG. 1195 PG. 1196 PG. 1197-1199 PG. 1200-1221 PG. 1222-1248 PG. 1249-1250 PG. 1251-1256 PG. 1257-1261 PG. 1262 PG. 1263 1135 ne Letter from the City of Apple Valley requesting that the City of Mound adopt a resolution opposing legislation authored by Representative Myron Orfield, DFL - Minneapolis, dealing with housing, metropolitan governance, development controls and transportation. PG. 1264-1265 Letter from Ted Fox, local resident, re: Certification of Real Estate Value (CRV's). PG. 1266-1268 Letter of Commendation written by Police Chief Len Harrell to Investigator Gary Lotton. PG. 1269 REMINDER: Committee of the Whole Meeting, Tuesday, April 20, 1993, 7:30 P.M., City Hall. Memorandum from City of Minnetrista re: upcoming meeting to discuss future trail development along the Dakota Rail line. Meeting is scheduled for Tuesday evening, April 13, 1993. This is the same night of our City Council Meeting. I have asked Jim Fackler to mention it to the Parks & Open Space Commission to see if they are interested in attending. PG. 1270-1272 REMINDER: Spring Clean Up & Recycling Days - Saturday, April 24, 1993 - 8 AM to 5 PM Sunday, April 25, 1993 - 10 AM to 5 PM This flyer is going out to 5500 households in the Mound area. Joyce Nelson, Recycling Coordinator, has also designed an evaluation form for people to complete and return to the City. Mayor Johnson suggested this as a way of getting feedback from users of the Clean Up and Recycling Days Project. PG. 1273-1275 1136 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 23, 1993 The city Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, March 23, 1993, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Skip Johnson, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Ken Smith. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, City Attorney Curt Pearson, Building Official Jon Sutherland and the following interested citizens: Dennis Erickson, Gert Gerold, Kiki Sonnen, Karen Walters, Nancy Lanz, Vera Bee, Dotty O'Brien, Cathy Bailey, Matt Reinitz, Jamie & Wendy Dahl, Craig Eckley, Nick Gerold, Durant Hins, Adam Cook, Allex Erickson, Matt Eckley, Joel Reinitz, Shane Banicki, Greg Gervais, Adele Mehta, Douglas Heinsch, Bill Voss, David Carlson, Peter Meyer, Michael Durell, Oy Moy, Fi Yin Moy, Phillip McDonald, Carolyn & Leo Fink, and Walter Garvais. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Boy Scout Troup #571. 1.0 MINUTES MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to approve the Minutes of the March 9, 1993 Regular Meeting and the March 16, 1993 Committee of the Whole Meeting, as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.1 PUBLIC HEARING: 1993 (YEAR XIX) URB]tN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM The City Manager explained that this year the following is being proposed for funding by CDBG funds: Westonka Community Action Network Westonka Intervention Westonka Senior Center - Operation Rehabilitation of Private Property $ 7,500 $ 5,700 $22,428 $27,395 TOTAL $63,023 The Mayor opened the public hearing. The following persons spoke in favor of the above programs: Dotty O'Brien, Nancy Lanz, Karen Walters, and Kiki Sonnen. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Jessen moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: ;/3? RESOLUTION #93.31 RESOLUTION APPROVING PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS FOR 1993 (YEAR XIX) OF THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGI~,M The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.2 _CASE 333 DR-U__MMO.ND ROAD LOTS 7 & 8 VARIANCE The Building Official explained that the owner of the property, Mr. Heinsch, was present and agreed to be a joint applicant with Duane Beimert in the request for a variance. This will be added to the proposed resolution. Johnson moved and Ahrens RESOLUTION #93-32 seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE RECOGNIZING AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING ADDITION AT 5125 DRUMMOND ROAD, LOTS 7 & 8, BLOCK 14, WHIPPLE, PID #25-117-24 12 0113, P & Z CASE #93-002 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.3 CASE ~91-005, ~p~E_ROAD LOT 6 BLOCK 11 The Building Official explained that Mr. Voss has requested an extension for Resolution #92-32. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Smith moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #93-33 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE EXTENSION TO RESOLUTION #92-32 FOR LOT 6, BLOCK 11, SETON, PID #19-117-23 21 0028, 4608 KILDARE ROAD, P & Z CASE #91-055 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.4 CASE ~93-004= ~333 .ID~EWOOD ROAD LOT 4 & E ~1~-~ 4~T 5 BLOCK I THE HIGHLANDS PID 23- -. 0014, VARIANCE The Building Official explained that the'applicant has now ro a_ current survey. This s ..,. ~,_, ~. . _ P vided should read as fol ~. ,,m=_ ~ ~ 1~ the proposed resolution ~ .......... } ..... ~ne C~ty does hereby approve a 2.4 foot ~un~ yar~ se~DacK variance ......... ,, He Plannina Commi~i ............ . ' ~=~u~u~u una~ the an =ne proposed resolution. ~ ..... ~zz ~nu =onQl=lons listed ,[ I =, I I Smith moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION %93-34 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE FOR LOT 4, & 1/2 OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, THE HIGHLANDS, PID %23-117-24 42 0014, 5860 IDLEWOOD RO]tD, P & Z CASE %93-004 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.5 CASE ~93-005: DENNIS ERICKSON, 2424 AVON DRIVE, LOT 1, BLOCK 1, SHI~V.RY HILLS UNIT B, PID ~24-117-24 12 0003t MINOR SUBDIVISION The Building official explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval. He then stated that it has been called to his attention that there should have been Park Dedication fees charged and he proposed adding #7 to the resolution requiring that fee in the amount of $500.00 per lot ($1000.00). The City Attorney stated this fee is required according to City Code. Smith moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution adding #7: RESOLUTION %93-35 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 1, RE-ARRANGEMENT OF BLOCKS i & 2, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT B, PID %24-117-24 12 0003, 2424 AVON DRIVE, P & Z CASE #93-005 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.6 CASE ~93-007: HESTIA HOMESt 3239 ROXBURY LANE~ LOT 1, 2 & 3, BLOCK 26, DEVON, VARIANCE The Building Official explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval last night with conditions as listed below: Proper drainage be maintained as to not adversely affect the neighboring properties. The drainage provisions shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Building official. A hard surface driveway is required and a control joint shall be installed at the intersecting front property line as approved by the Building official and Public Works Superintendent. (The Building official suggested that #2 be installed within 1 year and any new owner be apprised of this requirement. The Council agreed. This will be added to #2 in the final resolution.) There shall be not exterior storage on, or use of the unimproved Roxbury Lane. Ahrens moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #93-36 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A STREET FRONTAGE VARIANCE FOR 3239 ROXBURY LANE, LOTS 1-3 & S 25' OF VAC DRUMMOND ROAD, BLOCK 25, DEVON, PID #25-117-24 12 0201, p & Z CASE #93-007 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.7 CASE ~93-008: W.G. ANDERSON 5310 SHORELINE DRIVE AMENDMENT TO OPERATIONS PERMIT FOR EXTERIOR VENT STACK The Building Official explained the Planner,s recommendation. The Planner's recommendation was to have the exterior vent stacks boxed in with similar material to the building. Mr. Garvais,. representing Walter G. Anderson Corp., stated he would like to just paint the stacks with the same colors as the building. The Council discussed boxing vs. painting. Mr. Garvais assured the Council that they would not let the stacks become unsightly. The Council agreed to let them paint the stacks. Smith moved and Jessen seconded the following: RESOLUTION #93-37 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE AMENDED OPERATIONS PERMIT FOR WALTER G. ANDERSON CORPORATION AT 5310 SHORELINE DRIVE WITH THE PROVISION THAT THE STACKS WILL BE PAINTED TO MEET STAFF SPECIFICATIONS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.8 COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT Peter Meyer, 5748 Sunset Road, asked to be heard regarding the open space preservation referendum. He asked for a motion directing Staff to help Mr. Tom Casey in determining cost per $100,000 of bonds, applied to the City tax base as a whole. Simply how much per household per $1000 market value and how many years. Councilmember Smith stated he does not feel the City needs to spend Staff time and money on something that the open space preservation group should be doing themselves. The City Manager stated that the City has worked with Mr. Casey on the language for the question. He asked if the Council felt the City should involve itself beyond the establishment of the question when the City is not promoting this project. The Manager reported that he has spoken to Mr. Casey and told him he did not have the authorization from the Council to provide more information. The Council discussed this with regard to making sure the correct numbers get to the public so they can make an informed decision. The City Attorney stated that in his discussions with Mr. Casey, he felt Mr. Casey was asking for more research, not just one question, as stated by Mr. Meyer. He stated he. thinks the City Manager is concerned that the Staff is going to become a proponent by sitting down and doing the research work. The Mayor asked Mr. Meyer if he received a piece of paper stating that if the City of Mound were to issue bonds at an approximate interest rate (and the Finance Director has a good idea what the additional costs are and the rules of thumb), would he be back asking for more additional information? Mr. Meyer stated no, that they are looking to tell homeowners how many dollars this is going to cost them based on whatever the market value of their property is. The city Manager stated that he has not been able to get a firm number from Mr. Casey on the total cost before the City can give him additional City costs. MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen directing Staff to provide information pertaining to costs of bonding and spreading it to representative properties with a very limited amount of Staff time. If more information is asked for, Staff will come back to the Council for direction. Councilmember Jensen stated that Mr. Casey or the open space preservation group are going to have to come up with a figure on the cost of the land. The City Manager agreed that the land cost is the first step. The City Attorney stated that he has pointed out to Mr. Casey that there is no number on the cost of the land. That is the first step before other costs can be established. He suggested the group negotiate with Mr. Weber on a price. The city Attorney further stated that he has prepared and given to Mr. Casey language which would be clear, but a number needs to be inserted by the open space preservation group. He also pointed out that the developers of Teal Pointe are incurring costs everyday preparing the EAW, so the price of the land is going up daily. Mr. Meyer stated that there are many other parcels of undeveloped land in Mound which they would also be interested in acquiring. These may not be as expensive as Teal Pointe. He further stated there is a ceiling of the money that they can raise through a petition through a referendum and they would like to raise enough to purchase Teal Pointe, but if they can't, they could possibly save some of the other areas the developers haven't gotten yet. The Mayor stated that the Council has said that they do not support spending City money to do a referendum. The City Attorney cautioned the open space group about how they phrase the question they put in the petition because in talking with Mr. Casey he has presented some questions that would not be appropriate to present to the voters· He also pointed out that they also need to do some things with the petition that allow the City to find out if the signers are qualified voters in Mound. The vote was 4 in favor with Smith voting nay. BETWEEN HOUSE OF MOY AND PARKING LOT The City Manager reported that Mr. Durell has presented a petition asking the Council to reconsider the removal of the crosswalk in front of the House of Moy. The petition contains approximately 2,000 signatures. The City Manager reviewed the letter of March 19, 1993, from Tom Johnson, Transportation Planning Engineer for Hennepin County. The City had requested a "No Turn on Right" sign be placed at the south intersection of CSAH 110 and CSAH 15 for traffic turning east from northbound CSAH 110. Mr. Johnson's recommendation was that this not be installed because it has been their policy not to install these signs unless there is a sight distance problem or some other identified problem the sign could correct. The Council discussed the petition and the original decision to remove this crosswalk. The following ideas were shared by the Council: Eliminate the crosswalks at the House of Moy and the Post Office and install one east toward the bus shelter. Paint the crosswalk area differently so it is more visible. Having the House of Moy patrons use the parking lot behind the House of Moy and encourage Mrs. Moy to install a rear entrance to the restaurant. Trying to slow down the traffic on County Road 15. Pursuing the "No Turn on Red" signing at 15 and 110. Consider better signage for upcoming pedestrian crosswalks. The fact that the removal of the mid block crosswalks was done as a matter of public safety. Continue to monitor what happens after the mid block crosswalks are removed before taking further action. ® Maybe putting a barrier at the curb in front of the House of Moy to discourage people from just walking out the door and crossing. 10. Putting flashing lights at the crosswalk area. The following persons spoke: Michael Durell, 1317 S.E. 6th St., Mpls. - Author of the petition. He read the petition and encouraged the Council to leave the crosswalk at the House of Moy. Phillip McDonald, St. Paul - Pedestrian safety advocate. He stated that his wife was killed in a crosswalk in St. Paul and he is trying to encourage stronger laws in favor of the pedestrian. Oy Moy, 2458 Fairview Lane - Read letter from Randi Saba, who was struck in the crosswalk at County Road 15 and 110. Carolyn Fink, 2350 Chateau Lane - Stated her husband was struck in the crosswalk at County Road 15 and 110. Wendy Dahl, 5014 Shoreline Drive - Stated she was almost hit at the crosswalk near Hardees. Asked for better painting of the crosswalks. Mrs. Moy - Wants to keep the mid block crosswalk at her place of business. Suggested bigger signs by the Post Office to let people know that there is a crosswalk ahead. The Council discussed pushing for stiffer laws to enforce crosswalk violations by drivers. The Council stated that they met with the Downtown Business people about removing the mid block crosswalks prior to the action and they did not object. The Council discussed the fact that there has not been an accident in front of John's Variety since that crosswalk was removed. MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to reconsider the decision of February 9, 1993, to remove the crosswalk at the House of Moy. Councilmember Jensen stated she could add to the motion that the Council & Staff investigate some of the suggestions presented this evening. She stated she would like to see the City move quickly to move the crosswalk east of where it is located now. She stated she would not like to see the House of Moy crosswalk removed until a decision is made on installing another further east and it is installed. The Council discussed the fact that the consensus is that the crosswalk at the House of Moy should be removed and moved east toward the bus shelter. The maker of the motion and the seconder withdrew their motion and second. The Council took a short break. MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to refer the question of location of the House of Moy crosswalk to the Staff for further consideration and additional Staff and/or County input to respond to questions and suggestions made by the citizens and by Councilmembers regarding pedestrian safety. The vote was 4 in favor with Ahrens voting nay. MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to defer action on the removal of the House of Moy crosswalk untll a decision is made on the location of an alternative crosswalk. The vote was 4 in favor with Ahrens voting nay. The Council asked that the Staff try to figure out an alternative for an additional sign or flashing light at the current House of Moy crosswalk until a final decision is made. 1.10 SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ANENDM~NT OF MOUND,~ FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY REGULATIONS, SECTION 330:15 OF T~ MOUND CODE OF ORDINANCES M?.T_IONomade by .Jensen,. seconded .by Smith to set April 27, ~, zor a public hearing to consxder an amendment to Mound,s Floodplain Overlay Regulations, Section 330:15 of the Mound Code of Ordinances. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.11 RECOMMENDATION FROM PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION SUM~SR PARKS AND BEACH PROGP~%~ 199 il The City Manager explained that the Park & Open Space Commission has recommended approval of the proposed 1993 Summer Parks and Beaches Program. This was a budgeted item in the 1993 Budget. One new event will be "Celebrate Summer", which will offer special events at Mound Bay Park on the 4th Sunday of each month from May to August. MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to accept the recommendations of the Park & Open Space Commission on the 1993 Summer Parks and Beaches Program in conjunction with Nestonka Community Education and Services. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.12 APPROVAL OF A STIPULATION - RE: INTOXICATING LIQUOR TO MINORS MOUND VFW POST 5113 SELLINg: ,;, i I I I The City Manager explained that there is a revised stipulation that has been signed by the VFW and now needs Council approval. This states that the club intoxicating liquor license issued to the VFW shall be suspended on the following days: March 22, March 23, March 29, March 30, April 5, and April 6, 1993. In addition, the VFW shall pay the City a $500 civil penalty to offset the City's costs in this matter. Ahrens moved and Smith seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #93-38 RESOLUTION APPROVING A STIPULATION WITH VF~ POST #5113 FOR A VIOLATION OF THE MINNESOTA STATUTES CHAPTER 340A.503~ 8UBD. 2 (SELLING INTOXICATING LIQUOR TO MINORS) ~ AUTHORIBING THE I~YOR ~ CITY I"-~qAGER TO EXECUTE THIS STIPULATION The vote unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.13 LICENSE APPROVALS - WESTONKA MDA - PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Ahrens to approve a Public Dance Permit for Westonka MDA to be held March 27, 1993, at the Mound VFW Post #5113. The fee was waived. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.14 PAYMENT OF BILL~ MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to authorize the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the-mount of $807,151.66, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.15 APPROVAL OF APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM LAWFUL GAMBLINC Jensen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #93-39 RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM LAWFUL GAMBLING FOR THE WESTONKA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - JUNE 19, 1993 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ~NFORMATION/MISCELL~NEOU8 As February 1993 Financial Report as presented by Gino Businaro, Finance Director. B. Planning Commission Minutes of March 3, 1993 C. Parks and Open Space Commission Minutes of March 11, 1993. De F® Election information on redistricting. Letter from a citizen, thanking Officer John Ewald for his service to the community. REMINDER: Docks Meeting, Thursday, March 25, 1993, 10 AM to 12 noon, City Hall. Format will follow last year's meeting with realters. Please plan on attending, if possible. LMCD mailings. Letter from Hennepin County RE: Financing Alternatives. Environmental Program MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Johnson to adjourn at 11=15 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Attest: City Clerk PROPOSED RESOLUTION #92- AGENDA ITEM #3 RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HARRISON BAY MOBIL IN THE B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT TO ALLOW AN "OPEN SALES LOT" AT 4831 SHORELINE DRIVE, LOTS I TO 4, LOTS 20 AND 21, BLOCK 1, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT A, PID #13-117-24 44 0014, P&Z CASE #93-006 WHEREAS, Applicant, Patrick Andre for Freedom Oil (Harrison Bay Mobil) has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of an Open Sales Lot, specifically the sale of no more than five (5) used cars at one time, at 4831 Shoreline Drive, and WHEREAS, The Mound Zoning Ordinance defines an Open Sales Lot as: "Any land used or occupied for the purpose of buying and selling goods, materials, or merchandise and for the storing of same under the open sky prior to sale." WHEREAS, The subject property is located in the B-2 General Business Zoning District which allows Open Sales Lots by Conditional Use Permit, and; WHEREAS, Existing Conditional Use Permits on this property allows the following activities: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Motor fuel station. Minor automotive repairs. Valve jobs. Tire repairs. Service maintenance on automobiles. Gas welding. A vehicle impoundment area. Sales of small miscellaneous fishing tackle bait. and live WHEREAS, This property is located at one of the primary entrances to the City of Mound, therefore, visual impact is an issue, and WHEREAS, The impact of five additional vehicles parked on the property could be concluded to be relatively minor, however the cumulative effect of all the uses on this site could be more significant, and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has reviewed the application and recommended approval with 7 voting in favor and 2 opposing. The motion was approved with conditions. PROPOSED RESOLUTION PAGE 3 CASE NO. 93-006 7) Wooden fencing shall be maintained in good condition at all times and worn or broken boards shall be replaced immediately. 8) 9) No signage shall be placed on any fencing. Gates shall be closed at all times except when transferring vehicles into and out of the enclosed area. 10) The conditional use permit shall be reviewed annually. 11) There shall be no boat storage on the premises. Ail applicable ordinances and statues be complied with prior to the issuance of this Conditional Use Permit and all fees and penalties for existing building violations shall be paid prior to issuance of this permit by the City Building Official. All existing sales in violation of the Zoning Ordinance shall cease and desist within 30 days and the use shall be brought into compliance with the Ordinance and this permit within said time period. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for the following legally described property: Lots 1 to 4 inclusive and Lots 20 and 21, and that part of the vacated alley lying Northeasterly of a line drawn from the Northwest corner of Lot 4 to the Southwest corner of Lot 20, all in Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. PROPOSED RESOLUTION PAGE 2 CASE NO. 93-006 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: The City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit for Harrison Bay Mobil to allow the operation of an Open Sales Lot at 4831 Shoreline Drive, contingent upon the following conditions: A. No more than five ' cars/be for sale at one time.and that~for sale be parked in the location note~d on the si~e plan (Exhibit A). B. Ali IlL'~\C~iruture slgnag~{~%~l '? must/~A~o~Pn~form to City Code, except for the free standing "Mobil" sign which has already received a variance. Ce Compliance with those conditions in Resolutions 92-120, 87-126, 87-27, and 86-176, including the. following: 1) The use of seasonal signs on the property shall be limited to 1 sign advertising the subject business (or any other business), regardless of placement location, not exceeding 48 square feet of area, not exceeding a two month duration per occurrence and not occurring more than two times per year. Existing illegal temporary signs shall be removed immediately. 2) No major mechanical overhauls shall occur on the premises. 3) 4) 5) 6) Ail wrecked, abandoned and impounded vehicles shall be stored within the fenced enclosure. Retail sales~all ~'" ~ ? ~[- beO~~L-~ live bait~ sales of small miscellaneous fishing tackle only. Sales of fishing equipment, rods, reels, boats, motors and trailers shall be expressly prohibited. Storage within the fenced area shall include only abandoned, wrecked and impounded vehicles referred by the Mound Police Deparmtent and vehicles resulting from normal busi~ess~ ~epair operations. C,- u~/~~. O~ Storage ~nd sales of used auto parts shall be expressly prhobited. ,t, I ! I I PROPOSED RESOLUTION #92- AGENDA ITEM #3 RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HARRISON BAY MOBIL IN THE B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT TO ALLOW AN ""OPEN SALES LOT"" AT 4831 SHORELINE DRIVE, LOTS I TO 4, LOTS 20 AND 21, BLOCK 1, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT A, PID #13-117-24 44 0014, P&Z CASE #93-006 WHEREAS, Applicant, Patrick Andre for Freedom Oil (Harrison Bay Mobil) has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of an Open Sales Lot, specifically the sale of no more than five (5) used cars at one time, at 4831 Shoreline Drive, and WHEREAS, The Mound Zoning Ordinance defines an Open Sales Lot as: "Any land used or occupied for the purpose of buying and selling goods, materials, or merchandise and for the storing of same under the open sky prior to sale." WHEREAS, The subject property is located in the B-2 General Business Zoning District which allows Open Sales Lots by Conditional Use Permit, and; WHEREAS, Existing Conditional Use Permits on this property allows the following activities: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Motor fuel station. Minor automotive repairs. Valve jobs. Tire repairs. Service maintenance on automobiles. Gas welding. A vehicle impoundment area. Sales of small miscellaneous fishing tackle and live bait. WHEREAS, This property is located at one of the primary entrances to the City of Mound, therefore, visual impact is an issue, and WHEREAS, The impact of five additional vehicles parked on the property could be concluded to be relatively minor, however the cumulative effect of all the uses on this site could be more significant, and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has reviewed the application and recommended approval with 7 voting in favor and 2 opposing. The motion was approved with conditions. PROPOSED RESOLUTION PAGE 3 CASE NO. 93-006 7) 8) 9) Wooden fencing shall be maintained in good condition at all times and wQr~ or broken boards shall be replaced~Pkat~.~ ~ ~Lc~ ~ No signage shall be placed on any fencing. ~ Gates shall be closed at all times except when~ transferring vehicles into and out of the enclosed( area. 10) The conditional use permit shall be reviewed( annually. 12) There shall be no boat storage on the premises. Ail applicable ordinances and statues be complied with prior to the issuance of this Conditional Use Permit and all fees and penalties for existing building violations shall be paid prior to issuance of this permit by the City Building Official. All existing sales in violation of the Zoning Ordinance shall cease and desist within 30 days and the use -- ~ shall be brought into compliance with the Ordinance '~/~J~,,. ' ~an~ this permit within_said time per' d 2. This ....... Conditional Use Permit is gra~te~d f6~ the fol~ legally described property: Lots 1 to 4 inclusive and Lots 20 and 21, a vacated alley lying Northeasterly of a line drawn _f~6m Northwest corner of Lot 4 to the Southwest corner of Lot 2~--~i all in Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A. 3. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded__with ~he Recorder or the Registrar of Titles ii Hennepin County' pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section. 4~2.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considere~ a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. PROPOSED RESOLUTION #92- , RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HARRISON BAY MOBIL IN THE B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT TO ALLOW AN "OPEN SALES LOT" AT 4831 SHORELINE DRIVE, LOTS i TO 4, LOTS 20 AND 21, BLOCK 1, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT PID $13-117-24 44 0014, P&Z CASE #93-006 WHEREAS, Applicant, Patrick Andre for Freedom Oil (Harrison Bay Mobil) has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of an Open Sales Lot, specifically the sale of no more than five (5) used cars at one time, at 4831 Shoreline Drive, and WHEREAS, The Mound Zoning Ordinance defines an Open Sales Lot as: "Any land used or occupied for the purpose of buying and selling goods, materials, or merchandise and for the storing of same under the open sky prior to sale." WHEREAS, The subject property is located in the B-2 General Business Zoning District which allows Open Sales Lots by Conditional Use Permit, and; WHEREAS, Existing Conditional Use Permits on this property allows the following activities: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Motor fuel station. Minor automotive repairs. Valve jobs. Tire repairs. Service maintenance on automobiles. Gas welding. A vehicle impoundment area. Sales of small miscellaneous fishing tackle and live bait. WHEREAS, This property is located at one of the primary entrances to the city of Mound, therefore, visual impact is an issue, and WHEREAS, The impact of five additional vehicles parked on the property could be concluded to be relatively minor, however the cumulative effect of all the uses on this site could be more significant, and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has reviewed the application and recommended approval with 7 voting in favor and 2 opposing. The motion was approved with conditions. PROPOSED RESOLUTION PAGE 2 CASE NO. 93-006 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: The City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit for Harrison Bay Mobil to allow the operation of an Open Sales Lot at 4831 Shoreline Drive, contingent upon the following conditions: B® No more than five (5) cars be for sale at one time and that the cars for sale be parked in the located noted on the site plan (Exhibit A). Ail future signage must conform to City Code, except for the free standing "Mobil,, sign which has already received a variance. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for the following legally described property: Lots 1 to 4 inclusive and Lots 20 and 21, and that part of the vacated alley lying Northeasterly of a line drawn from the Northwest corner of Lot 4 to the Southwest corner of Lot 20, all in Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all of filing costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. CITY of MOUND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364-t687 (612) 472-0600 FAX (612) 472-0620 CASE NO. 93-006 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HE~RING TO CONSIDER THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERHIT FOR OPEN SHLES LOT HT HARRISON BHY MOBIL, 4831 SHORELINE DRIVE, IN THE B-2 GENEI~ff., BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, April 13, 1993 to consider the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for Harrison Bay Mobil to operate an Open Sales Lot which is defined by the Mound Zoning Ordinance as "Any land used or occupied for the purpose of buying and selling goods, materials, or merchandise and for the storing of same under the open sky prior to sale." The application specifically states that the materials for sale will be automobiles. This operation is proposed for the property at 4831 Shoreline Drive, legally described as: Lots ! to 4 inclusive and Lots 20 and 21, and that part of the vacated alley lying Northeasterly of a line drawn from the Northwest corner of Lot 4 to the Southwest corner of Lot 20, all in Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A, PID #13-117-24 44 0014. Ail persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk Published in "The Laker" 3-22-93 and mailed to property owners within 350' by 3-26-93. ~ ~ ~ printedonrecycledpaper MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 8, 1993 UNIT A. PID ,13-1LY-24 44 0014. CONDITIONAL USE PERNZT (AMENDMENT). Building Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed Mark goegler's Planning Report. The applicant is seeking modification of an existing conditional use permit to allow the sale of used cars. The proposal calls for the ability to sell five vehicles on the site. The vehicles will be parked along the west property line facing east. In addition to the proposed use, the existing conditional use permit allows the following activities on the property: motor fuel station, minor automotive repairs, valve jobs, tire repairs, service maintenance on automobiles, gas welding, a vehicle impoundment area, and sales of small miscellaneous fishing tackle and live bait. Visual impact to the area and the fact that this property is at one of the primary gateways to the City was addressed. Staff recommended that if the Planning Commission finds that the proposed use is appropriate at this location, the conditional use permit should be modified with the stipulation that the vehicles be limited to no more than five and that their location should be as proposed on the plan. If the Commission determines that the proposed use is not appropriate, a finding should be rendered that it is inconsistent with the intent of the B-2 zone, it is inconsistent with the Criteria for Granting Conditional Use permits, and that it is also inconsistent with ongoing efforts to improve the aesthetics and function of Mound's commercial business. The applicant, Pat Andre, explained to the Commission that the reason for the request is to supplem~ auto repair fluctuates. Mr. And impoundment and sales of small mis( live bait are not in use and have no~ in. The vehicle impoundment area w~ that there are a few cars stored occa they are waiting to be fixed. There was concern expressed about th signs painted on the cars for sale, Chair Meyer opened the public hearin¢ to speak on the issue, Chair Meyer The Commission questioned if they she conditional use permits on the pro[ should remove the conditional use pe area and sale of fishing tackle and the Commission will only review t permit, but requested staff to res~ previously issued conditional use request. It was noted that a variance was issu~ it could remain. Meyer commented that he would prefer sale. It was questioned where other to be worked on. It was suggested ti of the building could be moved back applicant was in favor of moving the MOTION made by Wsiland, eoconds~ approval of tho amendment to th. for Harrison Bay Mobil to allo~ the condition that no more than at one time and they be parked the site plan. Also that all City Code, except for the free s has already received a var,&nco. Those in favor yore: Michael, ] Voes, Wolland and Jenson. Claps Clapsaddle was opposed as he feels t the proposed use. Meyer would be in but not five. A Public Hearing will be held by 1993. ~nt income for the business as re stated that the vehicle ellaneous fishing tackle and ~ been in use since they moved ~s discussed and it was noted ~ionally within the fence when ~ visual impact of "for sale" md what it will look like. · There being nobody present [osed the hearing. uld be examining the existing erty, and if so, maybe they ~mits for vehicle impoundment )alt. It was determined that %e proposed conditional use ~arch the application of the mits and how they affect this ~d for the fence and therefore to see only 3 or 4 cars for cars would park when waiting ~at the fence at the west end ~ allow for more parking. The fence· by Mueller to recommend Conditional Use Permit an Open Sales Lot upon lve (5) care be for sale :n the location noted on ~ture signaqa confers to ~anding Mobil sign vhich MOTION carried 7 to 2. Ianus; Johnson, Mueller, addle and Meyer opposed. he site is inappropriate for ~avor of allowing three cars, e City Council on April 13,~'/ Hoisington Koegter Group Inc. 1313 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner DATE: March 2, 1993 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit (Amendment) APPLICANT: Patrick Andre (Freedom Oil) CASE NUMBER: 93-006 HKG FILE NUMBER: 93-10a LOCATION: 4831 Shoreline Drive (Mobil) EXISTING ZONING: General Business (B-2) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking modification of an existing conditional use permit to allow the sale of used cars on the property. Used car sales are classified as open sales lots in the Mound Zoning Code. Open sales lots are allowed in the B-2 zone subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit. The proposal calls for the ability to sell five vehicles on the site. The vehicles will be parked along the west property line facing east. In this position, they will not directly front on Shoreline Boulevard. In addition to the proposed use, the existing conditional use permit allows the following activities on the property: motor fuel station, minor automotive repairs, valve jobs, tire repairs, service maintenance on automobiles, gas welding, a vehicle impoundment area and sales of small miscellaneous fishing tackle and live bait. COMMENT: The Harrison Bay Mobil site is located at one of the primary entrances to the City of Mound. Accordingly, the City has always been sensitive to the appearance of businesses and other uses in this area. The "Welcome to Mound" sign is located across the street from the subject site. Land Use / Environmental · Planning / Design 7300 Metro Boulevard/Suite 525 · Minneapolis, Minnesota 55439 · (612) 835-9960 ' Fax: (612) 835-3160 Freedom Oil Planning Report March 2, 1993 Page Two In 1987, the conditional use permit for the property was amended to include the fenced vehicle impoundment area. At that time, one of the issues that was discussed was the visual impact of the proposal. The request to establish a used car sales lot at this location again raises the same issue. In light of Mound's emphasis to improve the aesthetics of Shoreline Boulevard and the emphasis on the redevelopment of the downtown area, is a used car lot appropriate at one of the primary gateways to the City? The answer to this issue is more of a policy issue than simply a zoning matter. In looking strictly at the impact of five additional vehicles parked on the property, it is possible to reach the conclusion that the impact is relatively minor. The cumulative effect of all of the uses on this site including the vehicle impoundment area and the proposed used car lot with "for sale" signage is more significant. Staff has serious reservations that the proposed use is appropriate because of the prominent location of the site and its role in shaping the public's perception of the City of Mound. Historically, it has been difficult to monitor and maintain compliance with other properties within the City that have the ability to sell limited numbers of vehicles. RECOMMENDATION: As was mentioned previously, the decision in this matter is one of policy. If the Planning Commission finds that the proposed use is appropriate at this location, the conditional use permit should be modified with the stipulation that the vehicles be limited to no more that five and that their location should be as proposed on the plan. If the Commission determines that the proposed use is not appropriate, a finding should be rendered that it is inconsistent with the intent of the B-2 zone, it is inconsistent with the Criteria for Granting Conditional Use Permits and that it is also inconsistent with ongoing efforts to improve the aesthetics and function of Mound's commercial businesses. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / PLANNED DEVELO City si Nound 534~ Na~ood Road, Hound, ~ 55364 Phonoz 472-0600; Faxz 472-0620 Copy to City Planner, ~--I~-q~ Zoning Sheet Copy to City Engineor~ Copy to Public Horksr ~her z Please tips or print tho following info~ationt EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USz: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. If applicable, a develbpment schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Develol~ent Cost of the Project: $ RESIDENTIAL DEVRLOPIiENTS ONLY: Number of Structures, ...... Number of Dwelling Unite Per Structure. Lot Area Per l~elling Unit:_____ sa. ft. Total Lot Area: sq. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional uae pe~lt, or other soning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(a) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutionm. Date September 22, 1992 RESOLUTION ~92-120 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SION SETBACK VARIANCH FOR HARRISON BAY MOBIL AT 4831 SHORELINE DRIVBt LOTS 1 TO 4 INCLUSIVE AND LOTS 20 AND 21, AND THAT PART OF THE VACATED ALLBYt BLOCK 1~ SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT A~ PID f13-117-24 44 0014~ P&Z CASE NUMBER 92-053. WHEREAS, Pat Andre of Harrison Bay Mobil, applicant, has applied for a setback variance for a free standing sign to City Code Section 365; and WHEREAS, An existing sign base lo~ated approximately 3' from the property line and approximately 12 from the closest curb line is to be used; and WHEREAS, The proposed 3.5' x 8' sign will project into the public right-of-way approximately 1' resulting in a -1' setback variance request; and WHEREAS, The height (15.5') and area (28 square feet) of the proposed sign are conforming; and WHEREAS, A free standing sign obstruct traffic along either Bartlett and at this location will not Blvd. or Shoreline Drive; WHEREAS, Free standing signs in the B-2 Zoning District cannot exceed 25' in height, 48 square feet in size, and must be setback 10' from the public right-of-way; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval. The Planning Commission found that the variance to utilize the existing sign base is consistent with section 23.506.1 of the Mound Code of Ordinances. In reaching this conclusion, the Commission considered the following factors: 1) property was taken to accommodate intersection construction, 2) that the pole has been used historically for free standing signs and it does not obstruct vision for vehicle operators, and 3) there is an inordinately large amount of green space between the sign and the adjacent traveled right of way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: The City does hereby approve a -1' setback variance for a free standing sign at'4831 Shoreline Drive upon the following conditions: 211 212 September 22, 1992 Upon installation of the new freestanding sign, all existing nonconforming signage on the property shall be removed· Specifically, the changeable message sign that is located on the northern pump island which is not in conformance with the Mound Sign Ordinance shall be removed· The use of seasonal signs on the property shall be limited to i sign advertising the subject business (or any other business), regardless of placement location, not exceeding 48 square feet of area, not exceeding a two month duration per occurrence and not occurring more than two times per year.. C. The sign must comply with Building Code provisions. This variance i~ granted for the following legally described propertY: Lots I to 4 inclusive and Lots 20 and 21, and that part of the vacated alley lying Northeasterly of a line drawn from the Northwest corner of Lot 4 to the Southwest corner of LOt 20, all in Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A, according to the plat thereof on fiX. and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota· This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used· The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. A sign permit shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk· The foregoing resolution was moved by ¢ouncllmember Ahrens and seconded by Councllmember Smith. The following voted in the affirmative: Ahrens, Jess.n, Johnson and Smith· The following voted in the negative: none. Counc i l~e~ber..,/Jensen Attest-: ~:it~ Clerk - '. 212 was ~' 162 July I/~, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87-126 Rr__,~LU~C~ AU~ORZZZ~ X ~~~ USB ~ ~ O~~ ~ R ~HICLE IM~U~ME~ ~, S~ ~ATI~I~ ~ (M~) FA~L~ ~ S~ ~ ~ MI~~~ FIS~ ~C~E ~ L~ BAIT AT 4831 S~ORELI~ ~EV~,~ PID %13-117-24 44 0014~ P & Z ~E t 87-6~ WHEREAS, the City Council on June 23, 1987, held a public hearing pursuant to Section 23.505 of the Mound Code of Ordinances, to consider the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for PID-113-117-24-440014 for the sale of small miscellaneous fishing tackle and live bait; and WHEREAS, the use of the subject property PID J13-117-24-440014 ia governed by four previous Conditional Use Permits 70-302, 70-302A,. 70-302B and 87-.27; and WHYS, it is the desire of the Mound City Co{mcil to consolidate the previous permits and combine them with the permit for sales of small miscellaneous fishLTg tackle and live bait; and WrlEREAS, the subject property is within the B-2, General Business Zone which allows motor fuel stations, retail sales, minor auto .repair and a'ssoc.iated vehicle storage by Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request and does recommend pprova 1; and WTiEREAS, all persons wishing to ba heard' were heard. NOW, THEREFCRE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the Conditional Use Permit is hereby granted for the following uses: 5. 7. Motor Fuel Station Minor Automotive Repairs Valve Jobs 'Tire Repairs Service Maintenance on Automobiles Gas Welding Vehicle Impoundment Area Sales of Small Miscellaneous Fishing Tackle and Live Bait BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforementioned uses shall be .subject to the following conditions: 1. No major mechanical overhauls shall occur on the premises. All wrecked, abandoned and impounded vehicles shall be stored within the fenced enclosure. 1152 Retail sales shall be limited to llve halt and the sal'es of small miscellaneous flshlng tackle only. Sales of fishing equipment, rods, reels, boats, motors and trailers shall be expressly prohlblted~ Ali slgnage for the buslnes~ shall be brought into conformance wlth the Hound Sign Ordinance. Exlstlng illegal temporary signs shall be removed immedlately. Se Storage wi:thin the fenced area shall Include only abandoned, wrecked and Impounded vehicles referred by the Hound Polic~ Department and vehicles resultlng from normal business repair operations. Storage and sales of used auto parts shall be expressly prohlbite~; Wooden fencing shall be malntalned In good condition at all times and worn or broken boards ~hall be replaced immediately.. No slgnage shall be,placed on any fencing..... Gates shall be closed at all times e~.cept when transferring vehicles Into and out of the enclosed area. 10. The conditional use permit shall be reviewed annually. 11. There shall be:no boat storage on the premlses. 12. Ail applicable ordinances and statutes be complied with prior to the Issuance of this Conditional Use Permit and all fees and penalties for exlstln~ building violations shall be pald prior to Issuance of this permit by the City Building Official. All existing sales In violation of the Zoning Ordinance shall cease and desist within 30 days and the use shall be brought Into compliance with the Ordinance and this permit wlthln said time period. Applicable provisions of Resolutions 70-302, 70-302A,. 70-3028 and 87-27 are hereby Incorporated into thls permit._resolutlon rendering the four previous resolutions null and void. The foregoing resolution was moved by ¢~uncllmember Jessen and seconded b~ Councllmember Johnson. The following CouncJlmembers voted in the affirmative: Abel, Jansen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted In the negative: none. Attest: City Clerk ~, I I I I ./ February 10, 1987 RESOLUTION NO. 87-27 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF A VEHICLE IMPOUNDMENT AREA AND SERVICE STATION?VEHICLE REPAIR (MINOR) FACILITY AT 4831 SHORELINE BOULEVARD, PID #13-117-2q-q4 O014 P & Z CASE #86-567 WrlERFAS, tM City Council on February 10, 1985 held a public hearing pursuant to Section 23.505 of the Mound Code of Ordinances, to cccsider the issuance o~ a Conditional Use Permit for PID t13-117-24-440014 for the operation of a vehicle impouqdment areal and W~ERBAS, the use of the subject property PID 113-117-24-440014 goyernedby three previous conditional u~ permits 70-302, 70-302A and 70-302B! and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Mound City Council to cons. Ii. re the previous permits and combine them with the permit for'operation of the impo~t areal and WHEREAS, the subject property is within the B-2, General Business Zone which allows motor fuel stations, minor auto repair and associated vehicle storage by conditional use permit; and W~EREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and ~loes' · t~:~erd appcoval; an~ ~, all persons w~shing to be heard were heard. NDW, THERF2CRE, ~ IT RESOLV~D by the City Council of the City o~ Mound, Minnesota, that the conditional use permit is hereby granted for the following uses: 1 ~tor Fuel Station [ Minor Automotive Repairs 3. Valve Jobs 4. Tire Repairs S. Service Maintenance on Autanobiles 6. Gas Welding ' 7. · Vehicle Impoundment Area BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the aforementioned uses shall be subject to the following conditions.. No major mechanical overhauls shall occur on U~e p~emis~s. Rll .wrecked, abandoned and impounded vehicles shall be sto~ within the ~enced enclosure. February 10, Ig87 Storage within the fenced area shall incluSe only abandoned, ~rcecked and impounded vehicles referred by the Hound Police Department and vehicles resulting from normal business repair operations. Storage and sales of used auto parts shall be expressly prohibited. Wooden fencing shall be maintained in goed ccx~ition at all times and worn or broken boards shall be replaced immediately. No signage shall be placed on any fencing. Gates shall be closed at all times except ~hen transferring vehicles into and out of ~e enclosed area. The c~dttl~l use permit shall be reviewed annually. There shall be'no boat storage on the p'remlses. · ApDlicable provisions of Resolutions 70-302, 70-302A and 70-302B are hereby incorporated into this permit resolution rendering the 'three previous resolutions null ard void. The foregoing resolution.was moved by Councllmember Jessen and seconded by.Councllmember Jensen. The'followlng C°uncllmembers voted In the afflrmatlve: Jensen, Je~sen, Johnson and Smith. The following Councllmembers voted in the negative: none. HaY&r- Attest: City Clerk I · November 25t 1~86 RESOLUTION N0.-SG-' 176 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR I~ITH T~E PLANNING COH~IISSION TO APPROVE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR PART OF LOTS ! THR0USN 20 AN0 21, BLOCK.I, 'SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT A PlO I 13-117-2~ 44 O01q (4831 Shoreline Boulevard) P & Z CASE NO. I~HEREASt Ben I~allnsk'1, c~vner of the p'roperty described as part of Lots I through 4, 20 and 21, Block 1, Shlrley Hllls Unit A, PI0 if 13-117-2~ q4 O014 (q831 Shoreline Boulevard)' has applled for a variance In setback to the front- yard.to a11o~ the construction of a 6 foot high ~ood privacy fence.within .~the required 30. foot front yard setback; and · I~HEREAS~ Exhlblt A has .al'so been submitted to Indicate l~he requested setback's of zero feet to the'east property line; and · I~IEREAS~ Ehe Clty Code Section. 23.~15(4) alto~s a four' foot Fence In the front yard locatlon In the B-'2 Seneral Business 0lstrlctl a6d t~IEREAS~ the Planning Cm~nlsslon has revle~ved the request and does ..recon~nend approval of the setback vai'lance ~vlth conditions: '-' 'NO~. ~ THEREFORE, BE IT RE. SOLVED ~hat the Clty' Council of the Clty of Hound, Hlnnesota, does hereby approve the t~o foot fence height va~lance to a11o~ a privacy fence constructed In the required 30 foot setback as sho~n on Exhibit A fbr part of Lots I through 4~ 20 and 21, Block l,'Shlrley Hills Unlt A, PII) ill 13-117-24 44 OOll~ (4831 Shorel. lne Bbulevar~l) upon the condition that ttie curren'tl¥ adopted resolutlons 70-.302, 70-302A, 70-302B:allowlng a condltlonal Use permit for tl~e proper, ty be modifled If any aban~loned vehlcles are to be stored on the' pr:~ml scs. The foregoing resolutlon ~vas moved by C~uncllmember Smith and seconded by Councllmember Peterson.' The.follc~vlng Councll~embers voted In the afflrm~tive: Jessen~ Paulsen~ Peterson~. Polston and Smith. The following Councllme~bers voted In the negatlve: none. ,, Attest: City Clerk - " I1 ,1 70-302B 12-8-70 RESO~iTiO.~ KO. 70-302B '?R2~OLUTIO~Z k".~NDIN, O ~LSSOL.';TION NO. '7b-302 (Special Use Permit) (Lots 1-4, Block 1, $.H. "A") B~ iT P~-~%gLWZD BY THE VILL%G~ COUNCIL OF ?HAT no storage of wrecked or abandoned cars be pe,,-~tted on ,the Cro~ Oil Properly (Lots 1-~, Block 1, S.H. "A".) Adopted By the Council this 9th day of December, 1970. 70-302S 12-8-70 ,1, I I a t, ?o-3o2;, 12-8-7o ?,ESO LUTION NO. 70-302A P~SOLUTION TO DENY THE USE OF THE P.°DPERTY LEASED BY CHAPJ~ES HESS, COMPDNLY REFFEP~ED TO AS THE PFLUG PPDPEP~"Y, FOR THE STORAGE OF V~{IC~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILL',GE COUNCIL OF MObND, MOUND, .~NNESOTA: That the p~operty leased by Charles Hess, cor..uonly referred to as the Pflug Property, ( Lots 5, 18, 19 and that pa~ of Lots 15, 16, and 17 lying E of a line par with and lO ft. W from the W line of Lot 18 and same extended incl adj vac alley lying between the Nk~y extenstion of the NEly and SP~ly lines of said Lot 5 Lot 5,15,16,17, 18, ~.ud 19, Block l, S.H. "A" ) should not be used for the storage of vehicles. Adopted by She Council this 8th day of December, 1970. //&3 ~$OL~TION ~0. 70-}02 (Lots 1-4~-:]~look 1, S.E. "A") %~EREAS, Charles Essa has asked for a Speotal Use Per~tt fo~ filling station~ tnolud~ automotive repair, ~alv~ Jobs, t~e re~t t~; ee~ce ~nte~nce on automobiles and ~ ~el~ ~St h~r~ vas held ~ D~emBer 8t 1~70,' ~ · ~ · :~- · ~. ... ;'. .'.'~ '" }. Valve Jobs "' ' '" :'" .'" ... . ~. Se~ce ~nt~oe on Automobiles ' ' . . :~( . . .' '...i~ . '.:.' '; ~ g o~ ~er~s ~'~e '~tt ' '"" · . ...'~.~ .... :...: : . .. .... .....~, . . : -~-. ..... · .. . .... ~.~.~';~':~.; · :- .., :, .:. ',~:,.. . · .....-':...f...:.~.., · '~ .... ..' '..:'".~,;2;~r~ . ." . ': ' .'~.' .. · ":.:.: ?". w . . . '.,' ' ,." ., .'... '. · ~.~ .'; .' . ~{,, ...... 'V~ ....~' ' .. ... .. '~... ~ · . . ... . . . .... . .... ...~ .. ,~=~... ...., ........,..~ .~,,... ,.. .... . ..... ~ ~ '" .;: . . .' .;.:~,::;~.~.~ ..... '.,~ ... ~ : · ? . ....?'/.....:~:.:......-... .,, . .%, . ...:. . ..,. . ~.'- .. .,. . . -~; .. · :.... '.,~.' , ,.. · . -.' ;,.. Adopted ~ the Co--il t~s' eth ~ of ~oe~%~, '1~0. ~" ~' . . ")'::'? .' .';r:: · ' ' ' .... · : ~..- ;}.:.. .... ~....' .'~."..} ,... . · ,.. ~ : .:, ~ .. , ,,'. · ... . ~.' ..~:; "~;' ~ · . ;.. . .. .....:.~.~ . ?;. ... .. .,. ~, : · . . . .~ . . ,~:. . ~ ." T'... · ". ... : ~: '"'" '~ ': ' · ' ~... .~ .~ . .. . . %.. ~ . .. 6? -67 4-8-69 RESOLUTION NO. 69-67 RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPEN A FILLING STATION ON LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 20 and 21, Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A, CONDITIONAL ON PLACING OF SHRUBS TO CLOSE THE DRIVEWAY ON THE POINT~ and I~ SUCH SHI~UBS ARE R~2~OVED AND THE DRIVEWAY OPENED, THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS IMMEDIATELY CANCELLED ,WttEREAS, the Crown Oil Company has appeared before the Planning Commission requesting a special use permit to operate a gasoline service station on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 20 and 21, Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A, and the Planning Commission has recommended that a special use permit be granted for the operation of a gasoline service station at this location provided that the northeast corner at Bartlett and Shore- line Boulevards be landscaped and that the most northeasterly driveway on Bartlett Boulevard be closed and not used, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA~ That a Special Use Permit be granted the Crown Oil Compan~ to operate a gasoline service station on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 20 and 21, Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A, provided the northeasterly d~iveway on Bartlett Boulevard be closed by placing ehrmbs across it,.and BE IT FURT~RR RESOLVED~ If such shrubs are removed and the driveway opened, the Special Use Permit shall be immediately cancelled. Adopted l~y the Council this 8th day of April, 1969. I1[.,.<' April 13, 1993 RESOLUTION NO. 93- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR TH~ ~DBG PROGRAM WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY - CONTRACT ~A07483 WHEREAS, the City of Mound, Minnesota and the County of Hennepin have in effect a Joint Cooperation Agreement for purposes of qualifying as an Urban County under the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs; and WHEREAS, the City and the County wish to execute a new Joint Cooperation Agreement in order to continue to operate as an Urban County for purposes of the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the current Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City and the County be a new Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City and County be executed effective October 1, 1993, and the Mayor and the City Manager be authorized and directed to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City of Mound, MN. (Contract #A0783). HENNEPIN OFFICE OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Development Planning Unit 822 South Third Street, Suite 310 Minneapolis, MN 55415 (612) 348-6418FAX (612) 348-6057 April 1, 1993 APR 2, 1993 Mr. Ed Shukle City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Shukle: Earlier we mailed you a letter inviting your continued participation in the Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program. At that time we were awaiting final language required by HUD for inclusion in the Cooperation Agreement. We have now received and incorporated the required language in the Joint Cooperation Agreement. Please find enclosed one copy of the Cooperation Agreement which highlights the changes from the previous agreement. Most of the changes are minor language changes or clarifications. In addition, new HUD language regarding the HOME Program and CDBG Program requirements are also reflected. We have also enclosed three copies of the Joint Cooperation Agreement and a sample Council Resolution for your convenience to authorize participation in the Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program for the next three years. A certi- fied copy of the authorizing resolution must be returned with all three copies of the executed Cooperation Agreement by May 25, 1993 to: Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development Development Planning Unit 822 South 3rd Street, Suite 310 Minneapolis, MN 55415 This date has been adjusted from the date in our earlier letter. HUD is, however, mandating that we adhere to this new schedule in order to assure execution by the County Board and transmittal of a fully executed agreement to HUD by the July 16, 1993 deadline. One copy of the fully executed Cooperation Agreement will be returned to you by that same date. HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer April 1, 1993 Page Two At the February 25, 1993 meeting with cooperating communities, it was suggest- ed that DPU staff explore support for the creation of a special initiatives set-aside funded from a portion of any increment in CDBG funds which might be received in Program Years XX and XXI. While a number of communities expressed support for the concept, a sufficient level of support was lacking and we have elected not to go forward with the Special Initiatives Program without further discussion. We have, therefore, not included any language relative to this matter in the Cooperation Agreement. We look forward to your continued participation with us in the CDBG Program. Should you have any questions concerning the Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Douglas A. Benson, AICP Planning Supervisor DAB:tf Enclosures: Urban County CDBG Program Schedule Joint Cooperation Agreement highlighting changes (1) Joint Cooperation Agreement for execution (3) Sample Resolution II/.? Urban Henneptn County Community Development Block Grant Program Contract No. AO7&83 JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITNESSETH: COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree that it is desirable and in the interests of ~~ funds as an Urban County within the provisions o~'"'~"'"'~'~'"'"~'""~'~'~ defined and, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions. I. DEFINITIONS The definitions contained in 42 USC 5302 of the Act and 24 CFR §570.3 of the Regulations are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, and the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them: ao "Act" means Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.). "Regulations" means the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act, including but not limited to 24 CFR Part 570. C. "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. "Cooperating Unit" means any city or town in Hennepin County which has entered into a cooperation agreement which is identical to this Agreement, as well as Hennepin County which is a party to each Agreement. 117o "Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" means the document bearfng that title or similarly requ£red statements or documents submitted to HUD for authorization to expend the annual grant amount and which is developed by the COUNTY in C0nJunctio~ with COOPERATING UNITS as part of the Community Development Block Grant program. "Metropolitan City" means any city located in whole or in part in Hennepin County which is certified by HUD to have a population of 50,000 or more people. II. PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing ~.~ activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly assisted housing and authorizes COUNTY to carry out these and other eligible activities for the benefit of eligible recipients who reside within the corporate limits of the COOPERATING UNIT which will be funded from annual Community Development Block Grant III. 6GREEMENT The term of this Agreement is for a period commencing on October 1, 1993, and terminating no sooner than the end of the program year covered by the Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for the basic grant amount for the Fiscal Year 1996, as authorized by HUD, and for such additional time as may be required for the ................... ..............................................................................................................~,:::!:i .......... .::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~'~ ::~ :::~:~::::~ ::: ..................................................................................... ............ :j i?::::??:iiii::':' ~:~! i:':~':~ !!i~!:::~:i!!ii~!~:~!~:!i!:!!i~:!*. ...... tX~: .............................. i~:'~iiii~:~ii~i~:~:::~i:~:i:~:!i~i!:::~::::::~~s~::::~:t::::~ ~D~.' ':' ......... ...... :::::::::::::::::::::~-::~::~.I- ~:::~t-.~:.:~::': .................................................................... :::':::"-: ........................................................................ ~ ........................................................................... ~ ................... ~ ~i~ .......... i~::::':::~.:::~.. I17/ This Agreement shall be executed by the appropriate officers of COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY pursuant to authority granted them by their respective governing bodies, and a copy of the authorizing resolution and executed Agreement shall be filed promptly by the COOPERATING UNIT in the Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development, and in no event shall the Agreement be filed later than~:*~{~:::~i'"::'"':':':':::::"~:":":::::::'":":'""~:: :-:.:-:.:-:...:::: ~:.:-:-:-:-:::-.-5~.:i:i:~.:.:~::.:$:~. ~ COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the applicant's certifications required by Section 104(b) of the Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 197~, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 196~; the Fair Housing Act, section 109 of Title IV. ACTIVITIES COOPERATING UNIT agrees that awarded grant funds will be used to undertake and carry out within the terms of this Agreement certain projects involving one or more of the essential activities eligible for funding under the Act. COUNTY agrees and will assist COOPERATING UNIT in the undertaking of such essential activities by providing the services specified in this Agreement. The parties mutually agree to comply with all applicable requirements of the Act and the Regulations and other relevant Federal and/or Minnesota statutes or regulations in the use of basic grant amounts. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to lessen or abrogate COUNTY's responsibility to assume all obligations of an applicant under the Act, including the development of the Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds pursuant to 24 CFR §570.300 et seq. COOPERATING UNIT further specifically agrees as follows: mo Bo COOPERATING UNIT will in accord with a COUNTY-established schedule prepare and provide to COUNTY, in a prescribed form, an annual request for the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds consistent with this Agreement, program regulations and the Urban Hennepin County Statement of Objectives. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that, pursuant to 24 CFR §570.501 (b), it is subject to the same requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement for a written Subreciptent Agreement set forth in 24 CFR §570.503. The Subrecipient Agreement will cover the implementation requirements for each activity funded pursuant to this Agreement and shall be duly executed with and in a form prescribed by COUNTY. COOPERATINGUNIT acknowledges that it is subject to the same subrecipient requirements stated in paragraph B. above in instances where an agency other than itself is undertaking an activity pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. In such instances a written Third Party Agreement shall be duly executed between the agency and COOPERATING UNIT in a form prescribed by COUNTY. Do COOPERATING UNIT shall implement all activities funded for each annual program pursuant to this Agreement within Eighteen (18) months of the authorization by HUD to expend the basic grant amount. Funds for all activities not implemented within Eighteen (18) months shall be added to the next annual basic grant amount received by COUNTY and allocated according .to the procedures set forth in and comply with all conditions of this Agreement. Implementation period extensions may be granted upon request in cases where the authorized activity has been initiated and/or subject of a binding contract to proceed. E. COOPERATING UNIT shall use funds provided pursuant to Section V. of this Agreement i~iiii~iii~!~ ~!~~ to undertake no more than Three (3) · :,:.:.......:,:,:,:..: ....... :+:.:.:.:,:.:.:.:.:::,:.:,:,:.:: :.:.:+:.:. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: grant-funded activities administered by the COOPERATING UNIT. Each activity shall have a budget of at least Seventy-five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00), or the total amount of the planning allocation of COOPERATING UNIT if less than Seventy-five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00). A COOPERATING UNIT may assign less than Seventy-five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00) to an activity when the activity is one that is programmed by at least one other COOPERATING UNIT and administered by only one COOPERATING UNIT ~iiiion behalf of the others, provided that the total activity at least Seventy-five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00). F. COOPERATING UNIT will take actions necessary to accomplish the community development program and housing assistance goals as contained in the Urban Hennepin County ~M~~iii~i~ ~~~ ~~!ii~ G. COOPERATING UNIT shall ensure that all programs and/or activities funded in part or in full by grant funds received pursuant to this Agreement shall be undertaken affirmatively with regard to fair housing, employment and business opportunities for minorities and women. It shall in implementing all programs and/or activities funded by the basic grant amount comply with all applicable Federal and Minnesota Laws, statutes, rules and regulations with regard to civil rights, affirmative action and equal employment opportunities and Administrative Rule issued by the COUNTY. COOPERATING UNIT that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes action by COUNTY to comply with its fair housing certification shall be prohibited from receiving CDBG funding for any activities. COOPERATING UNIT shall participate in the citizen participation process as established by COUNTY in compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. COOPERATINGUNIT shall comply with all of the administrative guidelines of the COUNTY now in effect or as hereafter promulgated. COOPERATING UNIT shall prepare, execute, and cause to be filed all documents protecting the interests of the parties hereto or any other party of interest as may be designated by the COUNTY. 4 COUNTY further specifically agrees as follows: COUNTY shall prepare and submit to MUD and appropriate reviewing agencies on an annual basis all plans, statements and program documents necessary for receipt of a basic grant amount under the Act. COUNTY shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, technical assistance and coordinating services to COOPERATING UNIT in the preparation and submission of the request for funding. COUNTY shall provide ongoing technical assistance to COOPERATING UNIT to aid COUNTY in fulfilling its responsibility to MUD for accomplishment of the community development program and housing assistance goals. COUNTY shall upon official request by COOPERATINGUNIT agree to administer local housing rehabilitation grant programs funded pursuant to the Agreement, provided that COUNTY shall receive Twelve percent (12%) of the allocation by COOPERATING UNIT to the activity as reimbursement for costs associated with the administration of COOPERATING UNIT activity. COUNTY may, at its discretion and upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to administer for a possible fee other programs and/or activities funded pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. COUNTY may, as necessary for clarification and coordination of program administration, develop and implement Administrative Rules consistent with the Act, Regulations, MUD administrative directives, and administrative requirements of COUNTY. V. ALLOCATION OF BASIC GRANT AMOUNTS Basic grant amounts received by the COUNTY under ~!~i~!ii!i!i~ of the Act shall be allocated as follows: A. COUNTY shall retain Ten percent (10%) of the annual basic grant amount for the undertaking of eligible activities. ,t, I I I I, Do So The balance of the basic grant amount shall be apportioned by COUNTY to COOPERATING UNITS in accordance with the formula stated in part C of this section for the purpose of allowing the COOPERATING UNITS to make requests for the use of funds so apPortioned.~ The allocation is for planning purposes only and is not a guarantee of funding. Each COOPERATING UNIT will use as a target for planning purposes an amount which bears the same ratio to the balance of the basic grant amount as the average of the ratios between: The population of COOPERATING UNIT and the population of all COOPERATING UNITS. The extent of poverty in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of poverty in all COOPERATING UNITS. The extent of overcrowded housing by units in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of overcrowded housing by units in all COOPERATING UNITS. In determining the average of the above ratios, the ratio involving the extent of poverty shall be counted twice. It is the intent of this section that said planning allocation utilize the same basic elements for allocation of funds as are set forth in 24 CFR §570.4. The COUNTY shall develop these ratios based upon data to be furnished by HUD. The COUNTY assumes no duty to gather such data independently and assumes no liability for any errors in the data furnished by HUD. In the event COOPERATING UNIT does not request its planning allocation, or a portion thereof, the amount not requested shall be added to the next annual basic grant amount received by COUNTY and allocated according to the procedures set forth in and comply with all conditions of this Agreement. ao Co VI. FINANCIAL MATTERS Reimbursement to the COOPERATING UNIT for expenditures for the implementation of activities funded under the Act shall be made upon receipt by the COUNTY of Summary of Project Disbursement form and Hennepin County Warrant Request, and supporting documentation. Ail funds received by COUNTY under the Act as reimbursement for payment to COOPERATING UNITS for expenditure of local funds for activities funded under the Act shall be deposited in the County Treasury. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall maintain financial and other records and accounts in accordance with requirements of the Act and Regulations. Such records and accounts will be in such form as to permit reports required of the County to be prepared therefrom and to permit the tracing of grant funds and program income to final expenditure. II? ' Fo COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree to make available all records and accounts with respect to matters covered by this Agreement at all reasonable times to their respective personnel and duly authorized federal officials. Such records shall be retained as provided by law, but in no event for a period of less than three years from the last receipt of program income resulting from activity implementation. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall perform all audits as may be required of the basic grant amount and resulting program income as required under the Act and Regulations. COOPERATING UNIT shall inform COUNTY of any income generated by the expenditure of CDBG funds it has received and shall pay to COUNTY all program income generated except as derived from activities with an approved revolving account. When program income is generated by an activity that is only partially assisted with CDBG funds, the income shall be prorated to reflect the percentage of CDBG funds used. COUNTY will retain Ten percent (10%) of all program income paid to COUNTY to defray administration expenses. The remaining Ninety percent (90%) of the program income paid to COUNTY shall be credited to the grant authority of COOPERATING UNIT whose project generated the program income and shall be used for fundable and eligible CDBG activities consistent with this Agreement. COOPERATING UNIT ~iiii!~iil.i.~!,i.!.!authorized to retain program income derived from projects with an approved revolving account provided such income is used only for eligible activities in accordance with all CDBG requirements as they may apply. COOPERATING UNIT shall maintain appropriate records and make reports to COUNTY as may be needed to enable COUNTY to monitor and report to HUD on the use of any program income. Any program income that is on hand or received subsequent to the closeout or change in status of COOPERATING UNIT shall be paid to COUNTY. Should an approved activity be determined to represent an ineligible expenditure of grant funds, the COOPERATING UNIT responsible shall reimburse the COUNTY for such ineligible expense. Ail reimbursements for ineligible expenditures shall be added to the next annual basic grant amount received by COUNTY and allocated according to the procedures set forth in and comply with all conditions of this Agreement unless decreed otherwise by a Federal regulatory body or by final determination of a court of competent jurisdiction. When it is determined by the COUNTY that grant funds have been expended on an eligible activity and through no fault of the COOPERATING UNIT the project fails or is no longer eligible, the return of grant funds shall be reallocated in the same manner as program income in Section VI.E. of this Agreement unless decreed otherwise by a Federal regulatory body or by final determination of a court of competent jurisdiction. VII. _PEAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION OR IMPROVEMENT The following provisions shall apply to real property acquired or improved in whole or in part using CDBG funds. Ao COOPERATING UNIT shall promptly notify COUNTY of any modification or change in the use of real property from that planned at the time of acquisition or improvement including disposition and comply with 24 CFR §570.505. Bo COOPERATING UNIT shall reimburse COUNTY an amount equal to the current fair market value (less any portion thereof attributable to expenditures of non-CDBG funds) of property acquired or improved with CDBG funds that is sold or transferred for a use which does not qualify under the CDBG Co Program income generated from the disposition or transfer of property prior to or subsequent to the closeout, change of status or termination of this Agreement shall be treated as stipulated in Section VI. E. of this Agreement. VIII. METROPOLITAN CITIES Any metropolitan city executing this Agreement shall defer their entitlement status and become part of Urban Hennepin County. Assistant County Attorney 1177 X. HENNEPIN OOUNTY EXEOUTION The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on , 1993, and pursuant to such approval and the proper County official having signed this Agreement, the COUNTY agrees to be bound by the provisions herein set forth. Upon proper execution, this Agreement will be legally valid and binding. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA By: Chairman of its County Board Assistant County Attorney Date: And: Deputy/Associate County Administrator Attest: Deputy County Auditor APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: Assistant County Attorney Date: 9 · · XI. GOOPERATING UNIT ~XFGUTION COOPERATING UNIT, having signed this Agreement, and the COOPERATING UNIT'S governing body having duly approved this Agreement on , 1993, and pursuant to such approval and the proper city official having signed this Agreement, COOPERATING UNIT agrees to be bound by the provisions of this Joint Cooperation Agreement, contract _.A07483 CITY OF By: Its And: Its Date: CITY MUST CHECK ONE: The City is organized pursuant to: __ Plan A Plan B Charter 3/26/93 10 //?? RESOLUTION NO. 93- RESOLUTION ~UTHORIZING THE 14~YOR~D CITYM~.N~GER TO EXECUTE THE 1993 MUNICIPAL RECYCLING GI~.NT~GREENENT BE IT RESOLVED, that the city Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute the 1993 Municipal Recycling Grant Agreement between Hennepin County and the City of Mound (Contract #A01983). John C. Edewaard 5125 Hanover Road Mound, Minn. 55364 March 6, 1993 MAR 8 Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minn. 55364 Dear Mr. Shukle: Thank you for the timely response to my query. Enclosed please fred a circulated petition addressing the desire to effect a change in the parking stares of Hanover Road. Would you please keep me appraised of any developments that may or may not result in a favorable fmding. Sincerely, ~foo~ C. Edewaard 472-3254 472-2637 (fax) Enclosures PETITION TO ESTABLISH NO PARKING ON HANOVER ROAD The property owners residing at 5125, 5138, 5137 Hanover Road and 3188 Tuxedo Boulevard, feel it is in their best interest to maintain a year round no parking zone on Hanover Road. The following reasons compel the neighbors to request this change: 1. Several Hundred vehicles turning around in our driveways each season (this frightens our animals and children, disturbs our sleep, creates a safety hazard' and disrupts the normal tranquility of our property). 2. The limited access to our property mused by cars blocking driveways, either partially or entirely. 3. Excessive commercial parking on a residential street. 4. Bumper to bumper overflow valet parking from the A1 & Alma's resteraunt. 5. Damage to our property from turning around on sodded surfaces, cars running over bicycles, toys, wagons and other property. We as residential property owners object to the continued use of our street as overflow parking for a commercial business. Let it be known that the signers below make up the entire residential population of the 'at issue' portion of Hanover Road. We therefore request that you find in our favor and effect this change as soon as possible. NAME ,, ADDRESS TELEPHONE - '2 / (. ' ~.L~' ' · .'~. '-' - I personally have circulated this page of the petition. All signatures were made in my presence. I believe that the signers signed their own names and that each personwho has signed is eligible to vote in an election according to the Minnesota election law. ~,~~ ~. ~LL)(J~{d Dated: ~L)x~ (_19, 1993. ,L, · I · i, McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue Nort~q, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 April 7, 1993 Telephone 612,,476-6010 612/476-8532 FAX Engineers Planners Surveyors Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City of Mound, Minnesota 1993 Seal Coat Program MFRA #6173 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Enclosed is a tabulation of the bids received on Friday, April 2, 1993, for the 1993 Seal Coat Project. Bids ranged from a low of $38,570.50, submitted by Allied Blacktop, Inc., to a high of $45,988.50. The Engineer's Estimate for this project was $41,000.00. Public Works is very pleased with the work done in the past by Allied Blacktop; therefore, we recommend Allied Blacktop be awarded a contract in the amount of $38,570.50. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron JC:3mk Enclosures An Equal Opportunity Employer 11~3 - BID TAB - CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA 1993 SEAL COAT PROGRAM MFRA #6173 ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR SEAL COAT (CRS-2), FURNISHED AND APPLIED 40,000 GAL $ 0.71/GAL 28,400.00 2. FA-2, CLASS C SEAL COAT AGGREGATE, APPLIED 1,700 TON $ 2.91/TON $ 4,947.00 FA-2, CLASS A CRUSHED GRANITE SEAL COAT AGGREGATE FURNISHED AND APPLIED 310 TON $ 16.85/TON S 5,223.50 TOTAL BID ........................................ . ...... $ 38,570.50 ASTECH CORPORATION ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR SEAL COAT (CRS-2), FURNISHED AND APPLIED 40,000 GAL $ 0.72/GAL $ 28,800.00 FA-2, CLASS C SEAL COAT AGGREGATE, APPLIED 1,700 TON $ 3.42/TON $ 5,814.00 FA-2, CLASS A CRUSHED GRANITE SEAL COAT AGGREGATE FURNISHED AND APPLIED 310 TON $ 15.00/TON S 4,650.00 TOTAL BID .............................................. $ 39,264.00 CALDWELL ASPHALT ITEM BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR SEAL COAT (CRS-2), FURNISHED AND APPLIED FA-2, CLASS C SEAL COAT AGGREGATE, APPLIED QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL 40,000 GAL S 0.82/GAL S 32,800.00 1,700 TON $ 3.55/TON $ 6,035.00 FA-2, CLASS A CRUSHED GRANITE SEAL COAT AGGREGATE FURNISHD AND APPLIED 310 TON $ 20.96/TON $ 6,497.60 TOTAL BID ............ .................................. $ 45,332.60 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS, INC. ITEM BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR SEAL COAT (CRS-2), FURNISHED AND APPLIED FA-2, CLASS C SEAL COAT AGGREGATE, APPLIED FA-2, CLASS A CRUSHED GRANITE SEAL COAT AGGREGATE FURNISHED AND APPLIED QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL 40,000 GAL $ 0.73/GAL S 29,200.00 1,700 TON $ 6.11/TON S 10,387.00 310 TON $ 20.65/TON $ 6,401.50 TOTAL BID .............................................. $ 45,988.50 CITY of N IOUND MOUND MII?,,ESGTA 55364- (612 472-0600 FAX~6*2 472-0620 March 2, 1993 Mr. Tom Creighton suite 1200 5500 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55416 RE: Enclosed Letter from Triax Cablevision Dear Tom: Enclosed is a letter dated February 17, 1993, from Mr. Richard J. Finch, Regional Manager, Triax Cablevision regarding a request to modify Section 17.508 of the City of Mound and Triax Cablevision Franchise Ordinance as it pertains to Regional Channel 6. I spoke with Mr. Finch on Monday, March 1, 1993, and he asked me what I was doing to respond to his letter. I indicated to him that I had not done anything with it and before I could recommend anything to the City Council, I would have to contact you regarding this request to see if you see any problems with it. I would imagine that you have received calls from other cities who have franchises with Triax regarding this same request. I would appreciate it if you would advise me at your earliest convenience as to whether or not the City should accept an amendment as proposed by Triax. I look forward to hearing from you. ce;ely, City Manager ES:is printed on recycled paper C, ABLEVISION 1504 2nd St. S.E., P.O. Box 110, Waseca, MN 56093 507/835-5975 FAX 507-835.4567 REC'D FEB 1 8 1993 February 17, 1993 Ed Shuckle City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Shuckle: The purpose of this letter is to request a modification of the Cable Television Franchise Ordinance, Article III, Section 10, Regional Channel 6. Article III, Section 10 of the Ordinance requires that "the standard VHF Channel 6 is hereby designated for uniform regional channel usage. However, until the regional channel becomes operational, Grantee may utilize the standard VHF Channel 6 as it deems appropriate." Although Triax has taken numerous steps both to receive and subsequently improve the quality of the regional channel signal, the signal quality remains unacceptable and violates FCC technical standards. Consequently, Triax would propose that C-SPAN II be substituted for the regional channel signal until such time as it is technically and economically feasible to carry a regional channel signal which complies with FCC technical signal quality standards. Federal law allows cable operators to obtain modifications of service requirements from the franchising authority ". . . if the cable operator demonstrates that the mix and quality of services required by the franchise at the time it was granted will be maintained after such modifi- cation.'' Carriage of C-SPAN II maintains public affairs programming on Channel 6, expands the hours of public affairs programming available to subscribers, offers a superior signal from a technical perspective, and provides February 17, 1993 Page 2 top quality programming from the United States Senate. Therefore, both the mix and quality of services required by the Franchise will be maintained after this modification, if not enhanced. I appreciate your consideration of this request, and I '11 be contacting you soon to answer any question you may have. Sincerely, / ~ichard J. Finch Regional Manager 04-08-199~ 14:~1 61~5461~00 BERNICK AND LIFSON PA P.O~ CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA RF.~OLUTION NO. GRANTING A WAIVER TO TRIAX CABLEVISION RFA3ARDING Tt~ SIGNAL CARRIAGE OF M~ETRO CABLE NETWORKS (REGIONAL CHANNEL 6) IN TI~ CITY OF MOUND CABLE SERVICE TERRITORY ~S, Triax Cablevision owns, operates and maintaim a cable television syste~ in the City of Mound, Minnesota (l~reinafter the "City") pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Cable Co_mmunications Fra~his~ Ordimnce; and ~S, the City has the authority and responsibility to administer axtcl ep. forc~ the Cable Communications Fr~ Ordinance (lm~ina~r the "Orclir~r~") ~ru~_ th~ right to approve any modifications or waivers thereto; and WHFJ~A$, the technical quality of Metro Cable Network (Regional Channel 6) is unacceptable and may violate FCC technical standards; snd ~S, currently no economically feasible alternatives exist for the transmission to the City of Mound of the Regional Channel 6 signal; and WHEREAS, Triax Cablevision has requested a waiver of its franchise obligation to carry Meu'o Cable Net',york on Regional Channel 6; and WHEREAS, thc City is inclined to grant such a waiver provided that thc City reserves unto itself thc future right, in its sole discretion, to require reinstatement of Mcixo Channel 6 pursuant to the franchise if some development ihould occur which would permit tl~ achievement of adequat~ technical standards in an economically feasible manner. NOW, THEREFOr, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monr~I: 1. That the City hereby grants a waiver to Triax Cablevision of its franchise obligation in Article Ill, Section 10 of the Ordinance requiring thc carriage of thc Metro Cable Network (Regio~ Channel) si.~sl on the standard VHF Chanml 6. 04-08-1993 14:Al 61A5461~0~ BERNICK AND LIFSON PA P.04 2. That this waiver shall be effective until such time as the City, in its sole disc~fion, determires that an economically feasible alternative exists which would permit the carriage of Metro Cable Network on ~ Channel 6 consistent with adequate technical standards. In such an event, the Me~ro Cable Network shall be reinstated on VI~ Channel 6 upon 60 days written notice from City (or such later time as may be reasonably established by City). The above IL, seA resolution was moved by Council Member and duly seconded by Council Member The followin/Council Members voted in the affirmative: The following Council M~mbers voted in the negative: Attest: P~sed and adopted this~ day of ,1993. City Clerk Mayor HOI~ll) CITY COUNCIL 4-13-93 AGENDA ITEM {10 MINUTES OF A MF.E G OF MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION APRIl, 12, 1993 WETL~qD8 H~P ~OD~F~C~T~ON. Secretary, Peggy James, reviewed the City Engineer's report and explained to the Commission that the Ordinary High Water (O.H.W.) elevation as indicated on the City's Wetland Map has been revised by the DNR. The Wetlands Map, dated 7-27-84, indicates an elevation of 947 which was determined by McCombs Frank Roos. The DNR revised the O.H.W. elevation for Saunders Lake to be 943.6 on 4-26-88. Michael Mueller referred to the Hydrographic Work Report and commented that he does not agree with the DNR's determination, he believes the elevation should be higher and suggested .5 feet above 943.7, or 944.2. Mueller highlighted the following statistics in the Hydrographic Work Report: - There were dead trees as high as 945.5. The survey was conducted in 1988 when we had one of our biggest draughts. - Washlines were evident on trees at 947.4. - The water surface at that date measured 944.92. - The downstream invert elevation is 943.7 If lake is draining properly 100 percent of time maybe 943.6 is adequate. Lake Minnetonka O.H.W. elevation is 929.5 which is .5 feet above the elevation of the dam. The Building Official noted that the City Engineer recommended the elevation to be consistent with that determined by the DNR. The Planning Commission directed staff to relate their concerns to the City Council. · · APR 6 1993 McComb$ Frank Floo$ Associate% Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 April 2, 1993 Telephone 612/476-6010 612/476-8532 FAX Engineers Planners Surveyors Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City of Mound, Minnesota Wetlands Map MFRA #8902 Dear Ed: It has been brought to our attention that one of the City's designated wetlands has an elevation for the Ordinary High Water (OHW) 3-1/2 feet above the DNR's OHW. This wetland is identified as #8 on the City's Wetland Map, which is also known as Saunders Lake and identified by the DNR as 27-185W. The City set their OHW in 1984 at an elevation of 947.0, in conjunction with the Hennepin Soil and Water Conservation District. At that time, the DNR did not have an OHW established for Saunders Lake. In 1988, the DNR asked for our information and proceeded to set an OHW of 943.6. Enclosed is a copy of the DNR's Hydrographic Work Report, which was used to set the new OHW. The City should revise their Wetlands Ordinance (Map) for Area #8 (Saunders Lake) to match the OHW elevation of 943 6 as used by the DNR. ' If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. JC:jmk Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. An Equal Opportunity Employer /If/ INNESOTA DIr- PARTM ENT OF NATURAL DlVlS ION OF WATERS P R O J E C T ' Saunders Lake RECEIVED · ?/)~X]I:~X~ _ Minnetrista MOUND PLANNING & INSP. ~. ,~ ~ ¢ . o. 27-185 - Henneoin COUNTY RiO. NO. 88-71 PURPOSI~' SURVEY [~] INVESTIGATION [-"l MAINTENANCE l---') Typ~ · L ~'Vi~L S l"~ TOPOGRAPHY ~"] NOHW /OHW F-~ R[CONNAISSANC[ F-~ HYDROGRAPHIC WORK REPORT Saunders Lake is located in Sections 22 & 23, Tl17~ R24 in the Metropolitan Watershed Unit. It is 36 acres.planimetered and was not meandered. Its outlet is from the east side of a north bay easterly to Langdon Lake. There is a trail crossing at the outlet with a 12" C.M.P. thru it which is presently buried on the upstream end. Consequently the top of the trail crossing is the present runout, otherwise the culvert would have served as the runout. ~a.$t31/88 the survey crew (Scherek, Young} completed an 0HW investigation of the lake and obtained the present elevations at the outlet. Our vertical control was from the following B.M. established by McCombs Frank Roos Assoc. Inc., a private surveying firm: top nut on fire hydrant in SW quadrant at the intersection of Halstead Lane and West Edge Rd., approx. ¼ mile north of the SE bay of the lake; £1ev. = 943.81, NGVD 1929. We found the following elevations at the outlet: Water surface Saunders Lake - headwater at trail crossing Centerline of trail crossing (present runout) Top downstream end of ~2" C.M.P. thru crossing Downstream invert 944.92 949.0 943.70 .Note: The upstream end of the culvert is buried by material which has sluffed in from the road and there is presently no outflow. Based on the downstream invert of the 12" C.M.P. the minimum old runout would have been 943.70, but was probably higher assuming the culvert sloped upwards towards the lake. 4/26/88 During our 0HW investigation we recorded the ground elevation at 12 trees (oak & elm). These trees fall into two groups according to their ground elevations, but the lower group includes the largest {and presumably oldest) trees. The average reduced elevation of the two groups is 943.6 and 945.5. All of the trees in the lower group are in water and are dead. Several trees in the upper group are dead or dying and have been in water at some point in time according to stain lines we recorded at 946.0 and 946.4. We-also recorded two distinct washlines at 946.3 and 947.4 which indicate even higher water levels. The lake elevation on the 1958_USG~quadrangle ~s shown at~942. .~ , Survey Crew Supervisor The above evidence indicates approx. 5.4' of fluctuation in the water levels of the lake. Although many factors would be involved, the history of the outlet would be one significant factor related to this fluctuation. Unfortunately very little is known about that history. However it is reasonable to assume that the water levels which resulted in killing most of the trees around the shoreline were artificially high levels caused by the blockage of the outlet culvert and/or the culvert elevation itself. The runout previous to [he existing culvert was probably lower than 943.7, to have enabled tl~e trees to grow to the size they did before they were inundated. Ba.~.~n all the available evidence the appropriate OHW of Saunders Lake is The elevation of 947 determined by the SWCD limnologtst is associated · idence on the landscape which resulted from artificially high water levels. __ti i 7 I · 1, FOR APRIL 13, 1993 COUNCIL MEETING: LICENSE RENEWALS: APPROVAL CONTINGENT UPON ALL REQUIRED FORMS, INSURANCE, APPROVAL OF APPROPRIATE DEPARTMENTS BEING COMPLETED. HAWKER'S LICENSE - BLUE BELL ICE CREAM 3218 SNELLING AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55406 2. GAMES OF SKILL 3. RESTAURANT - BOWLING - 4/2/93 - 4/1/94 AL & ALMA'S SUPPER CLUB (2) AMERICAN LEGION #398 (1) HEADLINERS BAR & GRILL (4) VFW POST #5113 (2) AL & ALMA'S SUPPER CLUB AMERICAN LEGION POST #398 DOMINO'S PIZZA #1974 H~Py GARDEN HARDEE'S HEADLINERS BAR & GRILL HOUSE OF MOY MOUND LANES SCOTTY B'S SUBWAY SANDWICHES VFW POST #5113 CLASS IV CLASS III CLASS II CLASS I CLASS II CLASS III CLASS IV CLASS IV CLASS I CLASS II CLASS III AMUSEMENT DEVICES MOUND LANES (8) (JUKE BOX) 6. POOL TABLES - AMERICAN LEGION POST #398 VFW POST #5113 HEADLINERS BAR & GRILL (2) VFW POST #5113 (2) LICENSES #2-#6 RUN FROM MAY 1, 1993 TO APRIL 30, 1994 NEW LICENSE - GAMES OF SKILL EXPIRES APRIL 30, 1993 HEADLINERS BAR & GRILL (5) $25.00 Day - Single Dance $200.00 Yr.- Annual Dance Date of Single Dance / License Year Annual Dance CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT APPLICATION LOCATION OF DANCE: T~PE oF D~cE: '?~ bi, c TIME PERIOD OF DANCE: ADDRESS: HOME PHONE #: WORK PHONE #: CHAIRPERSON OR ADDRESS: ~ %G ' ~ ~0:, I~h,c~ ! WOrK PHONE #: 9US- ~"7/~ Date Applicant' s Signature / Department Approval/Denial (Submit memo if denied) Police Dept. Adm. Bldg. Dept. Fire Dept. Approved Denied APRIL ?~ 1~93 APR 8 1993 MAYOR JOHNSON AND COUNCIL: DURING YOUR DISCUSSION OF MY APPLICATION FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION AT THE COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 23, SOME TIME WAS SPENT ON THE PARK DEDICATION FEE. ALONG WITH DECIDING WHAT THE FEE SHOULD BE IN MY CASE, IT WAS MENTIONED THAT THERE HAD BEEN CASES WHEN ALL OR PART OF THE FEE HAD BEEN WAIVED. MAY I TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST THAT YOU CONSIDER SUCH A WAIVER FOR ME FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: IN THE NINE SUMMERS SINCE MOVING TO AVON DRIVE IN JUNE OF 1984, I HAVE BEEN WORKING TO CARE FOR AND IMPROVE THE CITY GREEN SPACE AT INWOOD ROAD. I HAVE KEPT THE GRASS MOWED AND RAKED, CLEARED BRUSH~ PLANTED GRASS AND NURTURED YOUNG TREES IN ORDER TO PRESENT A SMALL PARK TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WHEN THE ADOPT A GREEN SPACE PROGRAM STARTED I ENROLLED AND CONTINUE TO SPONSOR INWOOD ROAD. PAYING A PARK DEDICATION FEE WILL NEVER MATCH THE POSITIVE EFFECT WORKING ON MY GREEN SPACE HAS HAD ON ME AND, I HOPE, ON MY NEIGHBORHOOD. ADOPT A GREEN SPACE IS THE BEST IDEA TO COME ALONG IN ITS ABILITY TO GENERATE THE CIVIC PRIDE THAT GOES WITH SEEING THE RESULTS OF COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER WORK. I'LL NEVER BE ABLE TO POINT TO WHAT MY MONEY BOUGHT, BUT I'LL ALWAYS BE ABLE TO SEE A WELL-TENDED BIT OF GREEN ON AVON DRIVE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. DENNIS E. ERICKSON 2424 AVON DRIVE MOUND. MINNESOTA Ill7 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364-1687 (612) 472-1155 FAX (612) 472-0620 1993 GREEN SPACE ADOPTION AGREEMENT SPONSOR~ ADDRESS: GREEN SPACE TO BE ADOPTED: PHONE #:bu/o,£ ~ %~--O~-~l ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: Clean up garbage and litter. Plant flowers, shrubs, and trees as approved by the Park Director. Remove non-native plants and noxious weeds by hand or by cutting as approved by the Park Director. TYPES OF PLANTS TO BE PLANTED: COLORS: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: printed on recycled paper 1993 Green Space Adoption Agreement Page 2 SPONSOR AGREES.TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. Clean up the green space at least one time each season and deposit the garbage at a site designated by the City of Mound; 2. Furnish plants approved by the City Park Director; 3. Keep plants properly watered, maintained, and weeded; 4. Refrain from using fertilizers, herbicides or pesticides without written permission of .the Park Director; 5. Furnish transportation and equipment for their workers; 6. Provide adult supervision for workers under 15 years of age; 7. Observe every safety precaution to protect workers from injury; 8. Obey all traffic and parking restrictions in the area people are working. No vehicles shall be driven or parked on green spaces except for immediate loading or unloading of materials; Protect all monuments, signs, and equipment; Notify the Park Director at least 48 hours before starting work; Return unused material and supplies furnished by the City within three days after completion of work; Perform the work in a safe and attractive manner; and Indemnify and hold harmless the City of Mound, its officers and employees from all liability and claims for death, injury, or property damage arising out of the performance or non-performance of said work. Sponsor(s) acknowledge that they or their volunteers are not considered to be employees of the City of Mound or any of its agencies. e 10. 11. 12. 13. THE CITY OF MOUND AGREES TO: 1. Furnish trash bags; 2. Pick up garbage collected by sponsor at a designated site and dispose of same; 3. To the extent possible, furnish plants if sponsor unable to do so; 4. Advise the sponsor regarding management of the green space; and 5. Notify the media and make other efforts to publicly acknowledge sponsor,s contribution. It is further agreed that the City of Mound reserves the right to terminate this agreement at an earlier date when, in the sole judgment of the Park Directcr, it i~ fcund that the Sponsor has not satisfied the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Spc ~ec~ .v,~'By City of Mound Da~.e / ' Date BILLS -April 13, 1993 BATCH 3033 BATCH 3034 TOTAL BILLS $152,172.08 121,375.77 $273,547.85 ]~oo o i =l ~o ? :W oo o.o. o Il . c Z ~ L~ r~ Iii I g i! 11 08-Apr-93 TO: FROM: RE: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER GINO BUSINARO, FINANCE DIRECTOR MARCH FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT INVESTMENTS The following is the March investment activity: Bought: CP 3.10 Shearson Due 05-28-93 198,802 CP 3.21 Dain Bosworth Due 04-28-93 199,484 Money Market Monthly Income Reinvested 1,825 Matured: CP 3.19 Shearson (596,302) CP 3.17 Piper Jaffray (198,985) Audit Auditors from the CPA firm of Abdo Abdo & Eick were with us for a couple of weeks this month. Their audit of the 1992 City financial activity is progressing as scheduled. A report to the City Council will be presented at the April 27, 1993 meeting. Also auditors from Hennepin County spent a few hours reviewing the 1989 and 1990 activity of the recycling fund and an auditor from our insurance company verified 1992 data for coverage purposes. New Utility Billing Release Joyce Nelson, our utility billing clerk, spent a day in Mankato to be trained on the new utility billing system upgrade. The upgrade will allow the accumulation of unlimited customer account history and meter history information and to access that information on line. CIT~ COUNCIL MEETING 4-13-93 ADD. ON: ITEH JI4.A. Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 320:00 OF THE CITY CODE BY ADDING SUED. 6 RELATING TO A PROCEDURE MANUAL FOR RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR PRIVATE ACTIVITIES ON PUBLIC LANDS AND AMENDING SECTION 437:05, SUBDIVISIONS 4 AND 6, RELATING TO DOCK PERMITS AND REQUIRED COMPLIANCE WITH CITY REGULATIONS The City of Mound Does Ordain: Section 320:00 of the City Code Subdivision 6 which shall read as follows: Section 320:00. is amended by adding a new 6_~. Public Lands ~ staff are Lands ~~anu~ ~ $9 ~~ forms ~al~manua~-l~~~~~~he City~unc~ ~9~, ~heCityCouncil~a~ Section 437:05, Subds. 4 and 6 of the City Code are amended to read as follows: Subd. 4. A_R~kio__gnFilin~' Applications for licenses shall be filed with the Dock Inspector at the City offices and he ~he ~D~pgctor shall recommend to the City Council that the license be approved or denied. No license will be recommended or authorized until the Dock Inspector determines that the proposed dock complies substantially with the term of all City ordinances. The ~ ~ball ~0n~alD ~ r,_e.N_i.n_.~ and/o[ ~~ ~ the ~p~can~ that ~ dock ~~.!~ ~issue4 for ~~~ ~ ~ ~9I~ ~ ~ ~ a ~~igR order pendin~ ~~l~ R~ ~~.nttl ~~~ correctioB ~ade with~~k~~f ~ ~9~let~he~measure~ Subd. 6. ~ ~ ~icat!~. If the applicant has not maintained a previously licensed dock, the Dock Inspecto~ may recommead to the City Council that an~ exlstin9 license be revoked, and the applicant's priorities unde~ this Section 437 be forfeited for the current year and fo~ the next boatin9 sea,on. A dock ~can~bas ~ correction ~[ p~ndin9 conce~ninc ~~~ ~[uctu~~se~acce$s the dock,'-~l~C.~a~ ~ili ~ot~is~ued ~compl~nc~~ co~eCtion order ha~ been ~~ ~~g~ ~9C~n~ave ~ee2 ~ade ~it~ the Doc~~~ Attest: Mayor City Clerk .............. Adopted by the City Council Published in Official Newspaper ........... I l CITY of MOUND April 1, 1993 TO: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY M~NAGER FROM: JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR OPERATIONS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: MARCH MONTHLY REPORT, 1993 You are familiar with the old adage, "if March comes in like a lion, it will go out like a lamb.', In our case, it did not apply. March came in roaring, continued bellowing through the middle part of the month, and went out growling. Sales were up 17% over March of 1992. Gross sales for the month were $96,951.00 compared with $82,542, in 1992. Customers were up 1106 over a year ago. For the first quarter, gross sales are up $30,234 over the first quarter a year ago, or 12%. On Monday night, March 22nd, after we were closed, myself and two of my part-time employees installed two new counter tops, which were custom made by G & S Cabinets, for the cash register areas. Putting in the new top at the main register was quite an ordeal with the over hang cigarette rack firmly imbedded in the old counter. We managed well, with a few improvisations, to finish by 10 PM. We also put in a new counter shelf. Just touching up somewhat. They are quite attractive. We also went out later in the week and purchased two sheets of plexiglass to cover the tops so that we can preserve them for a few years longer. Sometime this month, on a Sunday, I am shooting for having our new carpet installed. ~ printedonrecycledpaper 1~23 CITY of IOUND 534t MAYWOOD ROAD !IDUND IdlNNESQT~' 55364-I 687 (612) 472-060C FAX (6~, 2) 472-0620 April 8, 1993 TO: FROM: RE: CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK MARCH MONTHLY REPORT There were two City Council meetings in March. Agendas for these meetings were prepared. There were minutes, 9 resolutions, and 1 ordinance from these meetings. The following items were some of the highlights of the month: - Licenses for Tree Removal, Commercial Dock and Transient Merchants were prepared, applications reviewed and licenses issued. - Licenses application forms were sent out for Restaurants. - Reviewed the tax books to see what parcels of tax forfeit property had been sold over the last year. I then updated the computer on these properties. - Worked on the Zoning/Shoreland Management Ordinance revision that will inserted into everyone's Ordinance Book. - Tax forfeit property that will be coming to you shortly, after the Commission's review. - Got materials together for the May 1 Hennepin County Auction where Mound will be selling 4 vehicles. - Attended the Minnesota Clerk's & Finance officers' Association Annual Conference in Brainerd. - Continued to input the Minutes for 1993 into the Clerk's Index Program. - Monitored the election bills that are at the Legislature. fc pri~ted on recycled paper LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-0621 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Ed Shukle Len Harrell Monthly Report for March 1993 STATISTIC______~S The police department responded to 864 calls for service during the month of March. There were 20 Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 3 criminal sexual conducts, 1 robbery, 4 burglaries, 2 aggravated assaults, 9 larcenies, and 1 vehicle theft. There were 49 Part II offenses reported. Those offenses included 7 child abuse/neglect, 1 forgery/NSF check, 1 narcotics, 3 damage to property, 3 liquor law violations, 9 DUI's, 1 simple assault, 11 domestics (5 with assaults), 4 harassments, 5 juvenile status offenses and 4 other offense. The patrol division issued 95 adult citations and 5 juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for an additional 27 tickets. Warnings were issued to 21 individuals for a variety of violations. There were 4 adults arrested for felonies. There were 18 adults and 6 juveniles arrested for misdemeanors. There were an additional 8 warrant arrests. The department assisted in 5 vehicular accidents. There were 38 medical emergencies and 45 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies on 9 occasions in March. Property valued at $8,055 was stolen in March. MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - MARCH 1993 II. III. IV. INVESTIGATION The investigators worked on seven child protection cases and five criminal sexual conduct cases, accounting for 61 hours of time. In the first quarter of 1993, there have been 22 child protection cases and 5 criminal sexual cases reported. The robbery case from PDQ has been submitted to the county attorney for charging. Other cases investigated include aggravated assault, theft, theft by swindle, narcotics, vehicle theft, burglary, harassing communications, NSF checks, domestic assault and absenting. Formal complaints were issued for receiving and concealing stolen property, 2nd degree assault, fleeing police and DUI, false information to police and DUI, and switching plates to avoid taxes. Personnel/Staffinq The department used approximately 64 hours of overtime during the month of March. officers used 32 hours of comp-time, 131 hours of vacation, 34 hours of sick time, and 0 holidays, officers earned 58 hours of comp-time. Traininq Off. McKinley continues to attend the Southern Police Institute's Administrative officers Course. officers also attended EMT refresher, the Wilson Leadership Program, and Drug Interdiction through Traffic Enforcement · I attended the Spring Chief's conference in Bloomington for three days. Courses included Community Oriented Policing and Leadership, Liability Issues in Policing, Issues of Mandated Training, Understanding Crimes of Perversion, and Winning with Difficult People. I was also a presenter for the course "Preparing for the Human Rights Department." Police Reserves The Reserves donated 431 hours during March. PART I CRIMES OFFENSES REPORTED CLEARED UNFOUNDED Y~,CH EXCEPT. CLEARED 1993 CLEARED 8Y ARREST ARRESTED ADULT JUVENILE Homicide Criminat Sexual Conduct Robbery Aggravated Assautt Burg[ary Larceny Vehic[e Theft Arson TOTAL 0 3 1 2 4 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 o 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 o o 0 0 2 0 0 0 20 1 4 PART II CRIMES ChitdAbuse/Neg[ect 7 3 1 1 1 Forgery/NSF Checks 1 0 0 0 0 Criminal Damage to Property 3 0 1 1 0 Weapons 0 0 0 0 Narcotics 1 0 0 Liquor Laws 3 1 2 0 0 D~I 9 0 1 0 9 9 Simple Assault 1 0 0 0 0 Domestic Assault 5 0 2 Domestic (No Assault) 6 3 3 0 0 0 0 Harassment 4 0 0 Juvenile Status Offenses 5 0 0 0 2 2 0 Public Peace 0 0 0 0 0 Trespassing 0 0 0 0 0 AIl Other Offenses 4 0 0 2 2 TOTAL 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 49 PART III & PART IV Property Damage Accidents 5 Perso~a[ Injury Accidents 0 Fatal Accidents 0 Medica[s 38 Anima[ Cemptaints 45 Mutual Aid 9 Other Genera[ Investigations 691 TOTAL 788 20 18 Hennepin County Child Protection 7 TOTAL 864 12 21 22 1 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT MARCH 1993 GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS MONTH Hazardous citations 38 Non-Hazardous Citations 47 Hazardous Warnings 6 Non-Hazardous Warnings 3 Verbal Warnings 151 Parking Citations 27 DWI 9 Over .10 6 Property Damage Accidents 5 Personal Injury Accidents 0 Fatal Accidents 0 Adult Felony Arrests 5 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 25 Adult Misdemeanor Citations 0 Juvenile Felony Arrests 0 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 6 Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 0 Part I Offenses 20 Part II Offenses 49 Medicals 38 Animmal Complaints 45 Other Public Contacts 691 YEAR TO DATE 152 147 42 33 458 138 23 15 20 3 0 9 67 0 5 13 1 60 134 95 167 1,902 LAST YEAR TO DATE 162 67 31 130 333 336 11 6 22 4 0 20 8O 19 4 15 5 53 173 72 244 1,291 TOTAL 1,170 Assists 49 Follow-Ups 12 Henn. County Child Protection 7 Mutual Aid Given 9 Mutual Aid Requested 0 3,484 132 45 12 27 2 3,078 190 59 16 31 20 ,i. I I · i MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT MARCH 1993 CITATIONS DWI More than .10% BAC Careless/Reckless Driving Driving After Susp. or Rev. Open Bottle Speeding No DL or Expired DL Restriction on DL Improper, Expired, or No Plates Illegal Passing Stop Sign Violations Failure to Yield Equipment Violations H&R Leaving the Scene No Insurance Illegal or Unsafe Turn Over the Centerline Parking Violations Crosswalk Dog Ordinances Derelict Autos Seat Belt MV/ATV Miscellaneous Tags TOTAL ADULT 9 6 6 0 0 30 0 0 6 0 1 0 2 0 22 0 0 27 0 3 0 7 0 3 122 JUV 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT MARCH 1993 WARNINGS No Insurance Traffic Equipment Crosswalk Animals Trash/Derelict Autos Seat Belt Trespassing Window Tint Miscellaneous TOTAL WARRANT ARRESTS Felony Warrant Misdemeanor Warrants ADULT 0 3 3 0 4 11 0 0 0 0 21 1 7 JUV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Run: 6-Apr-93 10:34 PRO03 Primary ISN'$ on[y: No D~' Reported range: 02/26/93 - 03/25/93 .ctivity codes: All Property Status: All Property Types: All Property Descs: All Brands: ALL Models: Att Officers/Badges: All MCXJND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Property Report STOLEN/RECOVERED BY DATE REPORTED Page Prop Prop [nc no [SN Pr Prop Date Rptd Stolen Tp Desc SN Stat Stolen Value Date Recov'd Quantity Act Brand Model Off-1 Off-2 Recov'd Value Code Assnd Assnd D Prop type Totals: 900 E Prop type Totals: 75 ! Prop type Totals: 5,200 J Prop type Totals: 335 0 Prop type Totals: 75 R Prop type Totals: 625 Prop type Iota[s: 505 V Prop type Totals: 60 Y Prop type Totals: 280 **** Report Totals: 8,055 0 2.000 0 1,000 0 1.000 0 1.000 0 1,000 0 2.000 1 2.OD0 60 1.000 0 6.000 61 17.000 la31 Run: 6-Apr-93 8:06 CFS08 Primary ISN'S on[y: No Date Reported range: 02/26/93 - 03/25/93 Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: Ail Activity Resulted: All Dispositions: All Officers/Badges: All Grids: All Patrol Areas: All Days of the week: All MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Calls For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS 9000 SPEEDING 30 9003 J-NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L 1 9014 STOP SIGN 1 9018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION 1 9036 OBSTRUCTED VISION 1 9038 ALL OTHER TRAFFIC 3 9040 NO SEATBELT 7 9041 J-NO SEATBELT 1 9100 PARKING/ALL OTHER 2 9140 NO PARKING/~INTER HOtJRS 25 9200 DAS/DAR/DAC 6 9210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED 6 9220 NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF 22 9221 J-NO INSURANCE/PROOF OF 2 9303 LOST/ ALL OTHER 1 9312 FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS 12 9313 FOUND PROPERTY 2 9314 FOUND VEHICLES/IMPOUNDED 1 9450 PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS 5 9451 H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC. 1 9560 MEDICAL/AB 1 9561 DOG BITE 2 Page Run: 6-Apr-93 8:06 CFS08 Primary ISN~s on[y: No Dat~ ~eported range: 02/26/93 - 03/25/93 Ti age each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: AIl Activity Resulted: Dispositions: Ali Officers/Badges: Grids: AIl Patrol Areas: Days of the week: AIl ACTIVITY COOE DESCRIPTION 9566 ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS 9710 MEDICAL/ASU 9730 MEDICALS 9731 MEDICALS/DX 9732 MEDICALS/CI 9735 IOD INJURY 9~' %l OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED 9801 DOMESTIC/NO ASSAULT 9802 PUBLIC ASSIST 9900 ALL HCCP CASES 9904 OPEN DOOR/ALARMS 9920 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 9930 HANDGUN APPLICATION 9943 PROWLER 9944 UNWANTED GUEST 9945 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 9950 INFO/INT 9980 WARRANTS 9992 MUTUAL AID/8100 99 JTUAL AID/6500 9994 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER ~241 ASLT 2-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-OTHR WEAP-ADLT-FAM MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Ca[Is For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 3 1 35 1 1 1 2 6 2 7 3 13 5 1 / 1 1 1 8 4 3 2 1 ~age 2 Run: 6-Apr-93 8:06 CFS08 Primery ISN~s on[y: No Date Reported range: 02/26/93 - 03/25/93 Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: At[ Activity Resulted: All Dispositions: Ali Officers/Badges: Grids: Patrol Areas: At[ Days of the week: AIl MOUND POLICE OEPARTMENT Enfors Ca[Is For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY COOE ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF DESCRIPTION INCIDENTS A2522 ASLT 2-THREAT BODILY HARM-FIREARM-ADLT-ACQ A5351 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAM A5354 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM A5504 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-NO WEAP-CHLD-FAM A5535 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-CNLD-ACQ B3364 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT B3494 BURG 3'UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK WEAP-COM THEFT B3794 BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-COM THEFT B4860 BURG 4-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-N-UNK WEAP-UNK ACT D8500 DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSSESSION I3060 CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD J2500 TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR J2700 TRAF-ACCID-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION J2EO0 )RAF-ACC-GM-AL 10 MORE'UNK INJ-UNK VEH J2FO0 TRAF-ACC-GM-AL 10 2HR-UNK INJ-UNK VEH J3500 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR J3FO0 TRAF-ACC-MS-AL 10 2HR-UNK INJ-UNK VEH .1024 CSC 1-UNK ACT-PARENT-13-15-M L7071 CSC 4'UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-F .AA78 CSC 5-NO CONSENT CONTACT-ACQUAINT'lB OR OVER-M '~3001 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER ~3005 JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO Page Run: 6-Apr-93 8:06 CFS08 Primary ISN's onty: No Dat~.Reported range: 02/26/93 - 03/25/93 T ~nge each day: 00:00 - 23:59 How Received: AIl Activity Resulted: AIl Dispositions: Alt Officers/Badges: AIl Grids: AIl Patrol Areas: AIl Days of the week: AIl ACTIVITY COOE DESCRIPTION M4199 LIQUOR - OTHER M5313 JUVENILE-CURFEW M5350 JUVENILE-RUNAWAY N3190 DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 03881 OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-MINOR P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT P3' PROP DAMAGE-MS-PUBLIC-UNK INTENT R2333 ROBB-AGG-NO BH-GAS SRV-KNIFE CUT-ADULT-STR TF029 THEFT-201-5OO-GM-BUILDING-OTH PROP TF159 THEFT-201-5OO-GM-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP TG021 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-BUILDING-MONEY TG029 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-BUILDING-OTH PROP TG031 TG059 TG142 J3027 ¢1024 ~3080 X3200 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-COIN MACH-MONEY THEFT-LESS 200-GM-YARDS-OTH PROP THEFT-LESS 200-GM-CABLE COMM SYS-SERVICES THEFT-MS-ISSUE )~ORTHLESS CHECK-201-500 VEH THEFT-FL-OVER 2500-SNOUMOSILE CRIM AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS CRIM AGNST ADM JUST-MS-GIVE FLSE NAM POL **** Report Totals: MC)LIND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Ca[Is For Service INCIDENT ANALYSIS BY ACTIVITY CODE NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1 1 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 301 Page Run: 6-Apr-93 9:43 OFF01 Primary lSN's on[y: No Date Reported range: 02/26/93 - 03/25/93 Time range each day: 00:00 - 23:59 Dispositions: At[ Activity codes: Att Officers/Badges: AIl Grids: At[ MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Offense Report OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS Page I ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL CODE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ASLT 2-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-OTHR ~EAP-ADLT-FAM ASLT 2-THREAT BOOILY HARM-FIREARM-ADLT-ACQ ASLT 5-[NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-ADLT-FAN ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS-CHLD-FAM ASLT 5-THRT BOOILY HARM-NO ~EAP-CHLD-FAM ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM-KNIFE ETC-CHLD-ACQ BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-N-UNK ~EAP-COM THEFT BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC-U-UNK ~EAP-COM THEFT BURG 3-UNOCC NRES FRC-U-UNK NEAP-COM THEFT BURG 4-UNOCC NRES NO FRC-N-UNK ~EAP-UNK ACT A2241 A2522 A5351 A5354 A5504 A5535 B3364 B3494 B3794 B4860 ..... OFFENSES CLEARED .... ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT ARREST ARREST CEPTION TOTAL CLEARED D8500 DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSSESSION 13060 CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD J2500 TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR J2700 TRAF-ACCID-GM-AGGRAVATED VIOLATION J2EO0 TRAF-ACC-GM-AL 10 MORE-UNK INJ-UNK VEH J2FO0 TRAF-ACC-GM-AL 10 2HR-UNK INJ-UNK VEH J3500 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR J3FO0 TRAF-ACC-MS-AL 10 2HR-UNK INJ-UNK VEH L?071 CSC 4-UNK ACT-ACQUAINT-UNDER 13-F LAA78 CSC 5-NO CONSENT CONTACT-ACQUAINT-18 OR OVER-M M3001 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER M3005 JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO M4199 LIQUOR - OTHER 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 I 100.0 5 0 5 0 3 0 2 5 100.0 4 1 3 1 1 0 1 2 66.6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 7 0 7 0 7 0 0 7 100.0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 a · i, Run: 6-Apr-93 9:43 OFF01 Primary ISN's onty: No Da~;P,.Reported range: 02/26/93 - 03/25/93 T ~nge each day: 00:00 - 23:59 Dispositions: Alt Activity codes: AIl Officers/Badges: Grids: AIl MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Enfors Offense Report OFFENSE ACTIVITY DISPOSITIONS Page ..... OFFENSES CLEARED .... ACT ACTIVITY OFFENSES UN- ACTUAL ADULT JUVENILE BY EX- PERCENT CODE DESCRIPTION REPORTED FOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ARREST ARREST CEPT[ON TOTAL CLEARED M5313 M5350 N3190 03881 P3110 P3120 R2333 TFr TF159 TG021 JUVENILE-CURFEW JUVENILE-RUNAWAY DISTURB PEACE-MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS OBSENITY-MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-MINOR PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT PROP DAMAGE°MS-PUBL]C-UNK INTENT ROBB-AGG-NO BH-GAS SRV-KNIFE CUT-ADULT-STR THEFT-201-5OO-GM-BU]LDING-OTH PROP THEFT-201-500-GM-MOTOR VEH-OTH PROP THEFT-LESS 200-GM-BUILDING-MONEY TG029 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-BU]LDING-OTH PROP TG031 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-CO]N MACH-MONEY TG059 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-YARDS-OTH PROP TG142 THEFT-LESS 200-GM-CABLE COMM SYS-SERVICES U3027 THEFT-MS-ISSUE WORTHLESS CHECK-201-500 V1024 VEH THEFT-FE-OVER 2500-SNOWMOBILE ×3080 CR]M AGNST ADMN JUST-MS-OBST LEGAL PROCESS ~3200 CRIM AGNST ADM JUST-MS-GIVE FLSE NAM POL 100.0 66,6 0.0 0.0 50,0 100.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50,0 0,0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0,0 100.0 100.0 Report Totals: 65 4 61 22 24 3 12 39 63,9 CIT5 of X, IOUND MOU,,.D MiNt,~ESZ,7i 55L~64-t687 FAXc6~2 472 062{: Parks DEPARTMENT PARKS MONTHLY REPOR ( MARCH 1993 March is the month where we finish the winter work, such as the skating rinks and start preparing for Spring. The blowers were taken off the mowers, fluids changed, new filters and mowing deck put on. The bobcat has had the cab enclosure taken off along with the heating system. As we stand right now for our seasonal maintenance workers, we have one on-hand with a second one coming at the end of April. As always, we hope the weather holds off for the growing of grass until our crew shows up the middle of May. Each year we have some complaints because we have limited people so the high priority parks such as Mound Bay are kept up with while the smaller ones are mowed very limited. Cemetery March is always rough on the Cemetery, we see all the decorations from Christmas begin to pop up from the melting snow and the burial sites from the winter begin to settle. Not much can be done in March except to pick-up these decorations as they become unfrozen and hand fill the holes that are caused by the new graves settling. As always, we have a lot to do before Memorial Day. Trees There were to trees removed from City property and one complaint on private property. Docks The riprapping of 250 lineal feet of Devon Commons was completed along with 80 lineal feet at Kenmore Commons. The dock application process has slowed down and the issuing of sites will begin. This year there has been a great demand for docks and we may have to turn some residents away. We hope to assist these people to share a site with a current dock holder. JF:pj printed on recycled paper CITY of ,\ IOL'ND April 8, 1993 To: From: Subject: Ed Shukle City Manager Greg Skinner Public Works March Activity Report Street Department It was a quiet month for snow plowing. We went out on 3-10-93 to plow and sand and on 3-31-93 to sand only. No big storm during the any of the High School Tournament. We mixed another 100 tons of salt sand on 3-11-93. We hauled in 50 tons of blacktop milling from the Hennepin County shop in Hopkins. This will be use for base in the Lost Lake site and Centerview beach area. We removed the 2 sweeper from cold storage this month and spent one week preparing and servicing them. We will start sweeping April 1, 1993. We will first complete Co. Rd 15 and Co. Rd. 110. When this is done we will start in the 3Pts area and move in a clockwise direction and finish in the Dutch Lake area. This should take about 8 weeks. We also did sign work and prepared vehicles for their annual inspection which will be in April. Water Department This month we had 4 water main breaks and 2 of these were in the same spot on 2 different days. This happen on Lynwood Blvd at the S curve. We are in the second phase of our Cooper and Lead Testing Program. If this test results come back good we will be finished. prmle¢ on recycled paper ! apologize for not attending the Committee Of the Whole in March. There was a miscommunication between me and the Manager. As far as the water meter up-grade program goes, I have been in contact with Jim Grillo of Sensus and he will be at the next Committee meeting on April 20, 1993. Sewer Department We had 1 sewer force main break and 1 sewer line repair. We have been getting ready and set-up for our sewer line cleaning and televising. We will try to televise 7,000 feet of sewer line this year and clean 30,000 feet. CITY of .\ iOUND MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: April 8, 1993 City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff Jon Sutherland, Building Official MARCH 1993 MONTHLY REPORT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY In March there were 17 building permits issued for a total construction value of $258,399, and a year-to-date value of $619,614. The year-to-date value is 25 percent below last year at this time. Out of our 17 permits, 2 are for new homes, for a total of 4 new homes this year versus 6 last year. Road restrictions come off April 15th and activity at the front counter is picking up as usual. ~LANNING AND ZONING We are now actively working with our new Zoning and Shoreland Management Ordinance. We ask for more information, it takes more time to process permit applications, and there are a few kinks to work out of the system. The maximum 30 percent hardcover requirement is the greatest issue as a survey is required to verify the site conditions. Note the first draft of our hardcover calculation sheet attached. The City Planner, Mark Koegler, will be reviewing the draft of the Floodplain Ordinance with the Planning Commission on April 12. The Rental Task Force is to report to the City Council on May 25. Continued review of the proposed Truth in Housing Ordinance is taking place at the Planning Commission level. Staff's Shoreland Workshop on March 25 was a success and received a good response from local realtors. We are thankful for the participation of the DNR, LMCD, MCWD, and Re/Max Realty. JS:Dj printed on recycled paper HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS ADDRESS NAME EXISTING LOT AREA EXISTING LOT AREA HOUSE: LENGTH X SQ FT X 30% SQ FYX 15% WIDTH TOT~ff~ HOUSE ........... sQ FT GARAGE: TOTAL GAI~GE DKIVEWAY: TOTAL DRIVEWAY DECK: X = TOTALDECK ........... TOTAL DECK @ 50% ........ OTHER: X = TOTAL OTHER ........... TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER MEETS LOT COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS? BY DATE YES NO TOTAL ~IGN$ ANICAL rAIL IONAL :ON$ (LIBRAR YALL~ Liity o~ Mouncl BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT Month: ~.c. Year: 19~3 I Pl..MiTS VALUA'IION 2 165,050 I UNfI~ 2 165,050 PERMITS VALUATION I PEIlMITS PEP.MITS VALUATION 6,720 7 ,429 11 31,399 I P EP..J~ r~ VALUATION 2 4,500 I ~l~.Mfrs 3 3 2 14 22 PERMITS 57,450 3 61,950 PER.MITS VALUATION 1 6 1 i PEJU~ITs VALUATION 1 I PERMITS 17 THIS MONTH 17 33 0 1 5 8 12 32 10 18 0 0 I 3 ~5 95 VALUATION 258,399 m uNrrs #' PERJVll I S 4 33 VALUATION 393 ,.585 393,585 VALUATION VALUATION 53,000 6,720 126,313 VALUATION 16,045 99,716 VALUATION VALUATION VALUATION 619,614 MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MOUND, MINNESOTA FOR MONTH OF MARCH 1993 FIRE FIGHTERS DRILLS & MAINTENANCE FIRE & RESCUE 2 GREG ANDERSON X X $ 19.00 10% Il 51 6.CY3 306.00 ~ 201.50 5 D(lq BRYCE X X 2 19.00 0 31 &. ~O 6 SO~ BRYCE X ~ 1 9.50 2 8 6.00 48-00 ? DAV~ CARLSON X '-~ 2 19.00 2 29 6.00 174.00 8 jm CAS~Y x X 2 19.00 2% 41 6.00 246.OO 9 S-~v~ CO,.,m~ ' X X 2 19.00 2 II 23 6.OO ~38.00 11 ~'~v~ ERICKSON X X 2 19.00 0 33 6.29 206.25 12 PHIL FIS~ X X 2 19.00 1% 21 6.00 126.00 .... 13 G]~ GARVAIS X X 2 19.00 2 23 6.00 138.00 16 ~T(,. ~+-Nn~.~c~ X X 2 19.00 3 41 6.00 246.00 17 pAY]L ~¥ X X 2 19.00 3 24 6.00 144.00 18 l)p~m y.~n~m~ X X 2 19.00 2 28 6.00 168.00 19 RON ~ X X 2 19.00 3 25 6.00 20 JO+IN N~.~ X X 2 19.00 14 30 6.00 180 O~ 21 JAI~ NFY~eg)N X X 2 19.00 2½ 34 6.00 204.00 22 MARV N~L~ON X_~ ~ 2 19.00 1 27 6.00 162.00 2~ ,~ ~-~ (E~/ O~ o -o- o l~ 6.00 ~o.00 2~ ~ ~ x x 2 ~9.00 7 2~ 6.00 ,~2.00 29 Mi~,~ SAVAGE ~ --~ 2 19.OO 10 31 6.00 186.O0 30 K~'vIN SIPP~E~.L X X 2 19.00 2½ 39 6.00 234.00 3~ RONST. a~ X ~ i 9.~0 ~ 20 6.00 ~20.00 33 NM SW~SON X (~ 1 · 9.50 1 31 §,00 186.00 34 ED VANi~,~ X X 2 19.00 1% 37 ~.00 ~?~.Od' 156.00 ~, RiC~ WI'.I.I'AMS X X 2 19.00i4 ..... II26 6.00 36 TIM WI~.Lr~,MS X X 2 19.00 2 26 6,00 156.00 80 Ht 75 HI~ 155 HR.i 589.00 144½ 1077 155 Ip~s 589 .Of ~ 8,2&1.7'. MONTH OF MARCH' 1093 ~ 40 129 102 ~O~D FI~ ~'~ 32 ~ 4 60 42 MI~ETONKA BEACH FI~ MINNETRISTA FI~ ORONO F~ SHOREWOOD F~ SPRING PARK FI~ MUTUAL AID FI~ ~_~ TOTA~ FIRE CALLS -- TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS F~E ~ / F~ ~ ~. oF H~ F~ ~~_ - MOUND ~~ F~ ~ ~-~ ~?~ ~'ZR~S~A m~ ~ ~ --~_ 37 186 311 FI~ ~ _[2~ 135 33 - ORONO ~~ 48 41 118 25 ~ ~ ~_ _ 166 253 58 m~ ~-- ~ o ~o - s~o~wooo m~ FI~ ~~_ ~ 168 121 F~ O ~ 30 0 - ~ ~ ~~ 0 0 30 ~~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 30 60 0 Io:a: DR~LL ~OUeS ~55 ~ *~5 520 TOTAL FIRE HOURS 332 421 993 1~5 TOTAL EMERGENCY HOURS 74~ 367 1463 1256 ~ F~E & ~~ ~ 1077 7~ 2456 2351 ~TUAL AID RECEIVED 1 O 1 3 - MUTUAL AID GIVEN O O ~ 1 O DATE MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL MAINTENANCE FOR MONTH OF ~~. MEN ON DUTY 6 J. ANDERSEN /D~ G. ANDERSON J. BABB D. BOYD D. BRYCE S. BRYCE ~ D. CARLSON ~l J. CASEY ~ S. COLLINS _~ R. ENGELHART (~) S. ERICKSON /A P. FISK ~ J. GARVAIS /,~ D. GRADY ~ K. GRADY ,,~ C. HENDERSON 0'~ P. HENRY ,~ B. LANDSMAN =~ R. MARSCHKE /~/ J. NAFUS ,,~,~. J. NELSON / M. NELSON ~ B. NICCUM 7 ... O. PALM M. PALM /~k . T. PALM ~) G. PEDERSON ~) T. RASMUSSEN /0 M. SAVAGE __~~ K. SIPPRELL ~/ R. STALLMAN ~ T. SWENSON / W. WILLIAMS /~ E. VANECEK /~ R. WILLIAMS ~ T. WILLIAMS TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS /~ D R I I, L R E P 0 R 12 FiRE oiscipli.e and Tea.rwork Critique o£ ['ires Pre-plan and Inspections Tools and Apl~ratus Identify lland ~tin~ishe~ Operation Weaging P~otective Clothing Films First aid and Rescue O~ration Use of Self-Contained ~hsks Hours Training Paid : ~ Excused X Unexecused lhm,l)er Opera Lion Fire Streams & Friction Loss I louse Burnings Natural/Propane Gas Demos. Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio (~)era tions Ifouse Evolutions Nozzles & Hose Appliance 0 Present / Not Paid scellaneous : PERSONNEL gJ. Andersen G. Anderson J. l~ubb ~,~ D. Boyd _ D. Bryce ~ S. Bryce ~ l). (2~rlso, J. Casey S. Col lins R. I:~p.e_l I w~r t S. Evickso. ~ I'. I:isk M. Palm T. Palm G. Pederson ~_~T. Rasmussen N. &uvage ~-z-~ K. Sipprell .~Ii. Stallrm'm · Swenson · Swenson ~ E. Vanecek R Will ian~ ~~ Wil 1 ianm Woytcke DRILL REPORT MOUND FIRE DEPAR~[ENT DATE Discipline and Teamwork Critique of fires Pre-plan and Inspections Tools and Apparatus Identify !~and Extinguisher Operation Wearing Protective Clothing Films First aid and Rescue Operation Use of Self-Contained Masks Pumper Operation Fire Streams & Friction Loss House Burnings Natural/Propane Gas Demos. Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations House Evolutions Nozzles & Hose Appliance Hours Training Paid : ~ Excused X Unexecused 0 Present / Not Paid PREPLA~G AT: MARQI~h:m'r~: RA~¢~ 1~31,'~T19 .~.Nrm _o, pR!_~,~ P_~_RK; 2020 CO~EPC. E; T,AR'~rk~R. H~T.~ n~ _~ny. B0~-I BAT.mOA BLFFLDINGS MOUND AND SPRII~ PARK, SHIRLEY HILLS SCHOOL, RICKS SUPERVAIME, LOWELLS, ~d',-"I.,.u~,~,, T~STO~,q~A ESTATES, CHAPlin' PLACE, JUBILEE GRAN~DVIE~ APTS., TOWN & COUNTRY FOODS, BAY ~'~'~ , O'S'o-~Li-~'Ai,iS, JO~P~{S VARi,4f, POND, ~ii'~,i0~?iA ~'~O~.'Or{ S~OKi'S, ~'i~.%ur~y~, ~v~; ~)WA~, "V & S I-~LL" PERSONNEL ~Z~/a. J. Andersen ,__~ G. Anderson ~__~J. Babb D. Boyd D. Bryce S. Bryce ~ D. Carlson j. Casey S. Collins R. Engelhar t Erickson S. P. Fisk ~/~j. Garvais _~__D. Grady ,~__~. Grady · Henderson ,~..__~_~ P. Henry ,,t..~g. Bandsman ,~.,~R. Marschke i' Nafus · Nelson · Nelson ~ B. Nicctm~ ~---~-~G. Palm M. Palm T. Palm G. Pederson T. Rasmussen ~ M. Savage ~ K. Sipprell ~ ~i Stallman Swenson ~_~ ~. Swenson ~.Ri Vanecek Williams -_~' T. Williams ~D. Woytcke BOARD MEMBERS David H. Cochran, Chair Greenwood Tom Penn. Vice Chair Tonka Bay Douglas E. Babcock, Secretary Spring Park Scott Carlson, Treasurer Minnetrista Mike Bloom Minnetonka Beach Albert (Bert) Foster Deephaven James N. Grathwol Excelsior JoEIlen L Hurt Orono William A Johnstone Minnetonka Duane Markus Wayzata George C Owen Victoria Robert Rascop Shorewood Tom Reese Mound Robert, E. Slocum Woodland LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 900 EAST WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 160 · WAYZATA. MINNESOTA $5391 ' TELEPHONE 612/473-7033 EUGENE R. STROMMEN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR APR 2 1993 TO: MOUND CiTY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 1, 1993 FROM: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE SUBJECT: MARCH REPORT - LMCD 1.0 Eurasion Watermilfoil Task Force_-_ 1.1 The DNR has resolved to go forward with the enclosure tests ~o.,d.e~te, _,r~_'_ ~op~um S,o~nar. c..oncentration. Sites chosen are E. Parkers ,-,~, ,.axe z, umvra, ant] ~t Albans Bay, Lake Minnetonka. Field enclosure spaces 15' in diameter and 6' to 9' in height will be used. There will be multiple enclosures at each site. I have some reservations about the effect of sun shading in these partially occluded enclosures, which for many days is greater than 50% of the area. I have obtained a computer simulation of the shaded area for the months April thru August. These have been forwarded to the DNR and the Corp of Engineers for comment. Bob Pierce has been retained as the part time program supervisor for 1993. He was previously the consultant evaluating the programs' effectiveness. The proposed LMCD 1993 exotics control budget of $165.7M was presented at the March LMCD meeting. House Bill 864 providing for stringent penalties for transporting exotics and for diversion of 25% of the unrefunded gasoline tax to an aquatic nuisance account, has been introduced. Local sponsor is Rep Abrams of Wayzata. 2.0 Lake Management Platl 2.1 Lake Access. A parking agreement has only been concluded with Minnetristra. Agreements are in the works with Mound and Wayzata. Deephaven and Hennepin County are next up. 2.2 Shoreland Ordinance: All cities except Minnetonka have adopted their Shoreland Ordinances. Only Woodland has concluded an ordinance all the way through DNR approval. The remainder are held up by the log jam at DNR. Conditional approvals will probably be given, realizing that some non-conforming provisions might have to be dealt with later. The loosest item in all these ordinances seems to be the building height provisions, which appear excessive in terms of the goal of ultimately having the structures below the treeline. The provisions calling for storm water control are a real plus in terms of the long term effect on the lake. 2.3 Gabriel Jabbour, councilman from Orono, announced at the March LMCD board meeting that he is heading up an effort through the legislature, to reconstitute the LMCD as an elective body of five, with two appointed members representing the DNR and Hennepin County. This is a topic that was discussed at length during the drafting of the Lake Management Plan. It narrowly lost in adoption. 3.0 Other General Items 3.1 The Multiple Dock Fee study committee has been meeting in the continuing effort to discover what actual percentage of staff time is taken in the processing and control of the lake multiple dock program. Three marina owners, two mayors (Haug and Rockvam - he fits in the first group too!) and a couple of LMCD board members are involved. 3.2 A troublesome multiple dock license renewal (w/chan.ges) for the Gideon's Bay development is current. Tom Wortman, a prominent developer is matched up with some Tonka Bay abutting residents, including Mayor Veto Haug. The proposed docks could interfere with residents' views. · 3.3 The proposal for staggered LMCD board members' terms included in the Lake Management Plan is being held up in application due to some confusion on just when whose terms should start and end. 3.4 Some empirical decibel level testing will be done May 25th as the start on the program for noise reduction on the lake. 3.5 A lake Mayors' meeting is being planned for April 23d. 3.6 The Final draft of the joint DNR/LMCD report on boating on the lake has been received. It discloses that there has really been no significant increase in boating activity since 1984. Some hot spots have been identified, but these are known to all, and can be avoided. This information should put to rest some of the emotional statements about how crowded the lake has become. 4.0 Mound Specific Items 4.1 I would like to meet with the Council this month. While there are no huge issues to discuess, I feel it would be appropriate if we shared v~ews on several items, such as: the Miffoil program, changing the LMCD 3~ an electe~l~dy, shore lighting, staggered term, etc. Mound Representative - LMCD cc. Gene Strommen REC'D MAR P. 6 1993 LAKE MINNETONKACONSERVATION DISTRICT 900 E. Wayzata Blvd, Suite 160, Wayzata MN 55391 473-7033 Tuesday Thursday Saturday Tuesday Wednesday Friday Saturday Monday Tuesday Wednesday l0 13 14 16 17 19 20 28 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE APRIL 1993 LATF Siting Subcommittee 6:30 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata LATF Steering Subcommittee 8:00 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata Administrative Committee 4:00 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata Public Hearing/Gideon's Point HOA 7:30 am,#135 Norwest Bank Bldg, Wayzata Water Structures Committee 8:00 am,#135 Norwest Bank Bldg,Wayzata Environment Committee 8:00 am, LMCD Office, Wayzata Fee Study Subcommittee 4:30 pm, LMCD Office, Wayzata Lake Access Task Force 7:00pm,#135 Norwest Bank Bldg,Wayzata Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force 8:30am,#135 Norwest Bank Bldg,Wayzata Lakewatch Program 10:00 am, Tonka Bay Marina Club House 265 Tonka Bay Road, Tonka Bay Lake Use and Recreation Committee 4:30pm,#135 Norwest Bank Bldg, Wayzata Technical Review Committee 8:00am,#135 Norwest Bank Bldg, Wayzata LMCD Board of Directors Regular Meeting 7:30 pm, Tonka Bay City Hall 03/25/93 RE.C'D MAR 2, 6 1993 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Action Report: Meeting: Lake Use and Recreation Committee 4:30 PM.. Monday, March 22. 1993 Norwest Bank Building. Wayzata, Room 135 Members Present: Bert Foster, Chair, Deephaven: Mike Bloom. Minnetonka Beach: James Grathwol, Excelsior: Tom Penn. Tonka Bay. Also present: Sgt. Wm. Chandler, Sheriff's Water Patrol, Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. The meeting was called to order at 4:30 PM by Chair Foster. 1. Special Events A. New Special Event License Application The committee received a new Special Event License Applica- tion for the Silverado Pro Am Classic Crappie Tournament, Lake btinnetonka, 5/8/93. MOTION: Foster moved, Bloom seconded, to recommend approval of a Special Event License for the Silverado Pro Am Classic Crappie Tournament to be held on 5/8/93 with the stipulations recommended by staff. DISCUSSION: John Hesse, representing the applicant, said the3' have made application to the Water Patrol, to include their Certificate of Insurance, for a $1,000,000 liability coverage. He said the tournament is a Chevrolet truck promo- tion with the Ronald ~lacDonald House as the charitable recipient. The plan is for persons intending to fish to register at 14 Metro area Chevrolet dealers. Eighty-four names will be drawn to fish with 42 professional anglers. The other registrants can fish the lake individually. At the present time the sponsors do not know how many will participate. Foster asked if there will be a cut-off at a given number. Hesse said they do not plan to have a limit on participants. Grathwol said it will be important for the LMCD to have an esti- mate because it may be necessary to have a cut off if too many register. Hesse said they will give the District an estimate in April once registration is underway. Not all persons registerine are expected to fish. Hesse said Minnetonka Boats Works, Wayzata, will be weigh-in location. At the committee's request, Hesse agreed to have tournament staff at the public access launch sites to monitor orderliness and launch conditions. He said the professionals will be starting from a private marina landing. VOTE: .~totion carried unanimously. B. Renewal Special Event Licenses The following Special Event License renewals have been received: Holiday/Johnson Crappie Contest, 4/17/93 Invitational Bass Tournament. 6/6/93 Don Shelby Bass Tournament, 9/9, 10, 11/93 Minnetonka Bass Classic 6/5/93 LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE March 22, C. Ordinance Amending LMCD Code Sect. 3.09, Subd. 1,2,3 & 4 The committee received a copy of the Ordinance to allow the executive director to issue new Special Event Licenses. MOTION: Grathwol moved, Penn seconded, to recommend approval of the secof~tl reading of An Ortlinnnce Amending LMCD Code Sect. Subd. 1,2,3 & 4. waiving the third reading and ordering its adoption. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. D. Deposit Refund MOTION: Foster moved, Penn seconded, to recommend a deposit refund of $100 to the Westonka Winterfest, 2/13/93. Upon approv- al by the Board, the executive director is to accompany the refund with a cover letter advising the Westonka Winterfest that there was a deficiency in restroom facilities at the event, a matter which will have to be corrected at any futur~. event. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 2. ~ine and Beer License Renewal Applications MOTION: Foster moved, Bloom seconded, to recommend approval of the following wine and beer license renewals application subject to liquor liability insurance being in place and to Charter Boat Registration being issued: A. Paradise Princess, by David Lawrance B. Al 7 Alma's, I,II.III,VI,X, XI, XII by Merrit Geyen C. Excelsior Park, by Phil Weber VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 1) Refund Balance of Preliminary Investigation Fee The executive director reported the Water Patrol has charged $93.15 for the liquor investigation for the Excelsior Park char ter boat. - MOTION: Foster moved, Bloom seconded, to recommend the refund the unused portion of the $500 deposit charged the Excelsior Park for the liquor investigation by the Water Patrol. after payment of the investigation costs. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 3. Liquor License Renewal Application - "QE" MOTION: Foster moved, Penn seconded, to recommend approval oF the liquor license renewal with Sunday Option for the Queen of Excelsior, by John Lambin, subject to Charter Boat Reeistration being issued. --. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Grathwol asked the record to show he has represented the applicant in the past. LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE March 22, 19o3 4. Navigational Lights at Narrows Channel Denis Bailey. Hennepin County Lake Improvement, submitte(l a letter 3/5/93 advising that the green navigational lights were installed at each end of the Narrows Channel on 2/10/93. asked for advice as when the lights should be activated a~d deactivated for each season. The staff recommendation is from ice-out until fall freeze. The other time options were discussed. MOTION: Foster moved, Penn seconded, to recommend activating the navigational lights at the Narrows Channel from ice out until the fall freeze. VOTE: ~lotion carried unanimously. 5. Intentionally Made Open Water tloles in the Lake Ice .. The committee received a copy of a letter from the executive director to Water Patrol Deputy Cliff Schmidt regarding the potential hazard caused by intentionally made open water holes in the ice. The executive director explained the letter was occasionud by a call from a private party regarding open water approximately 9' x 10'at the Narrows Channel. schmidt told him open water spots occur among many places on the Lake such as the one men- tioned. The Water Patrol diving team as well as other divers cut holes in the ice to practice winter diving. There can also be open water when a fish house is moved. The practice is to place "thin ice" signs at the location. Penn suggested there be a method of registering the divin~ occasions. He also thought the diving could be done in low traffic areas. Chandler said the Water Patrol practices divin~ two times a month, year around, as do the sport divers. One reason for using the Narrows is that the ice is thinner. believes it is reasonable to put up "thin ice" signs. The ice normally freezes over quickly. The Water Patrol checks the open areas. Use of fencing was considered and found not practical. The executive director asked that the Water Patrol advise when and where there is going to be open water diving so the staff is aware when public questions are raised. 6. Decibel Subcommittee The committee discussed the plans for the decibel testing to be held on Tuesday, 5/25/93, 2 P~, and any interest in developine media attention. Penn said the test purpose is to listen to the 82 decibel sound to determine whether that is the problem or is it an open throttle problem. He said he does not believe it is necessary for media coverage. Chandler said there should also be testinv at different speeds, with some test speeds over 40 mph if boat traffic conditions permit. The Water Patrol is arranging for assistance from the Pollution Control Agency and Power Squadron. LMCD is to arrange for a variety of boats available for testing. LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE 7. Water Patrol Report March 22, 1903 Chandler reported the following: ACCIDENTS 2/28/q3 Car stuck in ice - Crystal Bay 3/7/93 - ATV through ice - Brown's Bay 3/22/93 - Snowmobile Personal Injury Accident - Wayzata Bay CRIMINAL 2/27/93 Theft from Fishhouse - Smith's Bay 2/28/93 Theft of Jacket on Ice - Robinson's Bay 3/11/93 Theft of Dock - West Arm Bay There were no DWI's for this time period. There was a total of six for the season. MISCELLANEOUS 3/1/93 Impound of a stolen snowmobile. Chandler said the Conservation Officers found three houses abandoned, a small count. There were none burned down this year. The investigators solved a number of thefts and recovered considerable property. 8. Personal Flotation Device (PFD) Whistles Chandler explained the whistles are intended to be attached to a life jacket for use if the wearer goes overboard. The Water Patrol distributes whistles at boat and recreation shows, pro- grams and on the lake. The DNR funded the program in the p;~st. It no longer does. The Water Patrol also distributes certifi- cates to young people who are wearing a life jacket. The executive director has received whistle bids at 20 cents per 1,000 and 18 cents for 2500. The whistles have an imprint encouraging boaters to use life jackets.. MOTION: Penn moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend the purchase from the Save the Lake Fund of 2500 PFD whistles for distribution by the Water Patrol. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 9. Charter Boat Matters The committee discussed the information available to thc public about the location and accessibility of life jackets charter boats. David Lawrance, Paradise Charter Cruises, their crew makes a public announcement before leaving the dock as to the location of life jackets. Chandler said that during the annual inspection the Water Patrol checks to see that the PFD's in storage have the straps undone for ready use. Penn asked if there has been action on the diesel fumes from the charter boats when docked at Excelsior. Lawrance said th~ charter boat operators have discussed this issue among them- selves. They agreed to keep engines off during boarding. charter boats have diesel engines - Paradise Princess. Queen Excelsior and Lady of the Lake. LAKE USE AND RECREATION COMMITTEE March 22, 1903 10. Water Patrol Annual Report The executive director has the Water Patrol's annual report from the Sheriff's Department. It will be copied for tile Board to be discussed in April. Chandler commented that 1,ake Minnetonka is one o1' tl~c salc:*t lakes in l~linnesota. There are more regular ions, and bet ter enforcement. Patrol hours are up and activity is down. This coming year there will be more Special Deputy trainees. There wi I 1 be four patrol boats on Lake Minnetonka for 1993. The Sheriff's Department has received a Federal grant for overtime. 75% of which is spent on Lake btinnetonka. At the urging of the committee, Chandler said the Water Patrol could use new marine radar units. They have four that are in need of upgrading. MOTION: Penn moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend appropriat- ing approximately $1700 from the Save the Lake Fund to purchase n marine radar unit for the use of the Water Patrol · The unit would be capable of measuring speeds down to 2 mph. VOTE: [lotion carried unanimously. 11. Adjournment Foster declared the meeting adjourned at 5:40 PM FOR THE COMMITTEE Eugene Strommen. Executive Director Bert Foster. chair LAKE MINNETO~ MULTIPLE DOCKS OWNERS ASSOCIATION PO BOX 324 SPRING PARK, MN. 55384 April 5, 1993 All multiple dock owners: As you might be aware, part of our settlement with the LMCD is to have a committee study the expense of the district in issuing and monitoring multiple dock license. Enclosed you will find the minutes for the last two meetings. Please review them and let us know ffthere are other issues you would like us to bring on your behalf to the LMCD relative to the above. We will be holding a meeting at Excelsior Park Tavern on Wednesday, Apr. 14, at 5:30pm. Our dialogue with the LMCD has been helpful to both parties and we feel that the district is being more responsive to our group. We would like to thank the following for sending contributions toward our legal fund. There are more multiple dock owners that have made a pledge and we are waiting for their contribution. Those who have paid are; Baltic Mortgage, Bayview Condominittms, Curly's Minnetonka Marina, Excelsior Park Tavern, Grays Bay Resort & Marina, Bean's Greenwood Marina, Minnetonka Boat Works, Harrison Harbor Twinhome Association, Howards Point Marina, Lord Fletchers of the Lake, Sandy Beach Place, Sailors World, Wayzata Yacht Club-Site 1 & 2, Rockvam Boatyards, Schmitt's Marina, Shorewood Marina and Yacht Club, Tonka Bay Marina, Windward Marine, Garsten Management, Boat Rental of Minnetonka, Lafayette Club, & Jennings Cove Dock Owners Assoc. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Fee stUdy Committee Minutes 3:30 pm, Tuesday, March 9, 1993 LMCD Conference Room, Wayzat9 Present: Scott Carlson, Dave Cochran, LMCD Board; Gabriel Jabbour, Tonka Bay Marina; Paul W. Pedersen, Grays Bay Marina; Jerry Rockvam, Rockvam Boat Yards Inc. Mayor Vern Haug, Tonka Bay; Admn Technician Rachel Thibault, Executive Director Gene Strommen; STAFF REPORT ON TIME STUDY. The executive director and administrative technician presented time documentation for January and February. The executive director's time for the first two months, on a narrow identification of water structure/multiple dock time commitments is 10% of his time. These are lighter months for executive director attention since the license processing taking place is primarily handled by the administrative technician. The administrative technician's direct multiple dock related time for january/February is 39%. This includes license processing, new dock license applications and deicing inspection. Dock license processing is at a high level at this time in preparation for final renewal by the board. Again the time is being applied from a narrow base due to the pending negotiations with the Fee study committee representa- tives as to how much time from other responsibilities might be reasonably allocated to multiple docks. MULTIPLE DOCK RELATED ACTIVITIES REVIEW, ITEMS 5, 6, 7 and 8. with items 1 through 4 agreed in January, 1993, as the basic applicable activities of multiple dock license administration, processing and regulation functions of staff, items 5 through 8 were discussed as follows: 5. Reviewing and processing Code amendments governing multiple docks as needed, engaging attorney to counsel administrative staff, committee members and board. Jabbour expressed concern about the percent of cost for adopting new codes and amendments. The time it · takes to get through committee to board is not efficient from his observation. Pedersen conceded some basic charge may be justified It was suggested staff look into how many new code additions and amendments affecting multiple docks were made in the past two years. FEE STUDY COMMITTEE, Minutes, 3/9/93, p. 2 A suggestion for controlling license fees overall would be to base them oa a three year cost average. Jabbour concluded that there is justification for including some cost for item #5. Conducting studies and reviews prompted by the installation and operation of multiple docks which directly impact the lake, for example, dock construction materials evaluation, off lake storage. This was agreed to be applicable to multiple docks. It was pointed out that this area will require technical consulting service at times. Conducting lake use density studies to determine future boat density and distribution allowances of multiple docks as changes in use are measured and reported, as directed by the Management Plan. This item included discussion on how boaters from non-multiple docks benefit from these studies and how these non-multiple dock boaters contribute to their cost. It was pointed out that city levies, Hennepin County and state funding through grants do represent the general boating public. Upon some review of a percent of cost discussion, it was concluded that 15% of such studies would be mutually agreeable with the multiple dock representatives. Servicing litigation resulting from failure of multiple dock licensee to comply with LMCD stipulations, orders or ordinance requirements. The multiple dock representatives felt strongly that this cost should be charged to the licensee not in compliance. This could be done through an annual deposit. Another option would be posting a bond. There was no concensus or recommendation as to how this might be handled. NEXT MEETING, ADJOURNMENT. The next meeting was recommended for 3:30 pm, Tuesday, April 13. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:50 pm. Respectfully submitted, Executive Director The second meeting of the Fee Subcommittee was held on March 9, 1993. Present at the meeting: Gene Strommen, LMCD staff; Rachel Thibault, LMCD staff; Scott Carlson, Dave Cochran, LMCD Board; Mayor Vern Haug, Tonka Bay; Gabriel Jabbour, Tonka Bay Marina; Paul W. Ped. ersen, Gray's Bay Marina; Jerry Rockvam, Rockvam Boat Yards, Inc. A report was given by LMCD staff o.n progress with the time use study. Because this has only been under way for 2 months, it is too early to draw any conclusions. As previously indicated, at least I full year will be required to establish meaningful data. Items 5, 6, 7, and 8 of the purpoie statement were discussed as follows: #5 - Chargeable time to multiple licenses for time reviewing code amendments. Staff will review how many code additions and/or amendments were made in last two years that pertain to multiple docks. #6 - It was agreed that time spent reviewing installation, operation, and construction of multiple docks was appropriately chargeable to multiple docks. #7 - It was agreed that some limited amount of expense for boat density studies was chargeable to multiple docks. Those present agreed that 15% of total cost would be appropriate. offices. #8 - It was suggested that specific license holders found to be in non compliance should be liable for costs incurred by the district due to non compliance. Possible solutions could be an additional required deposit or a performance bond. It was also suggested that license holders who are continually in compliance be rewarded with some type of incentive such as a partial refund or credit, lgo agreement was reached on how to handle this item. The next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, April 13 at 3:30 at LMCD LMCD Fee Subcommittee Note~_ The first meeting of the Fee Subcommittee was held on January 21, 1993. Present at the meeting: Gene Strommen, LMCD staff; Rachel Thibault, LMCD staff; Scott Carlson, LMCD; Dave Cochran, LMCD; Gabriel ]abbour, Tonka Bay Marina; Paul Pedersen, Gray's .Bay Marina; and Jerry Rockvam, Rockvam Boat Yard. The Statement of Purpose was discussed and amended to clarify the fact that Multiple Dock Related Activities are a portion of the district's activities. Additional discussion was held in regard to the list of Multiple Dock Related Activities as prepared in advance by LMCD staff without Multiple Dock License Holders' input. Some of the items were deemed to need further discussion and possible clarification so that future fees might have limits as related to future programs and activities not currently existing. It was agreed that at least one year of cost tracking would be required to produce meaningful data. It was also suggested that multiple Dock Activity costs be broken down further by the type of dock such as marinas, residential multiple, municipal, and yacht dubs. Discussion was held on the efficiency of the current licensing program. Some of the items discussed were as follows: 1. Possibility of local munidpal inspection service using the LMCD 2. Licensing of an envelope or "gross" dock use area with certain existing limitations rather than the present BSU/WSU system. 3. Incentives by way of cost for multiple dock license holders who continually exist without significant change or code violations. 4. Charges to be accessed against specific license holders not in compliance in order to cover administrative time as it relates to achieving necessary compliance. 5. Requiring a performance bond to protect the District in its ability to collect possible fees and/or fines as they relate to noncompliance issues. The next meeting of the Fee Subcommittee will be held March 9 at 3:30 p.m. at the LMCD office. CITY of MOUND 612¢ -'-2-0633 FA)','6~2 272-0623 March 26, 1993 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ED SHUKLE, CITY HANAGER SUBJECT: URB~I~ HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM - REHABILITATION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY Per Councilmember Ahrens' request at the Public Hearing of Year XIX CDBG Funds held on March 23, 1993, I contacted Hennepin County who administers the private property rehabilitation program for us. In year XVIII (July 1, 1992 through December 31, 1993) approximately $22,000 has been committed for three clients for the following types of repairs: roofs, windows, siding, furnaces, electrical upgrades, plumbing upgrades and interior kitchen cabinets. There are currently six persons on the waiting list for rehabilitation funds. The following income guidelines are used by Hennepin County in administering this program: One person $17,850 Four persons $25,000 Eight persons $33,630 If you have any other questions with regard to this subject, please do not hesitate to contact me. ES:is eprtnted on recycled paper Na~onal League of Cities March 24, 1993 MAR 2 9 1993 Dear NLC Member: 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington. D.C. 20004 (202) 626-3000 Fax: (202) 626-3043 I am writing to thank you for your time and effort in helping us shape a national plan to assist local economies to recover. Your letter was one of hundreds in response to NLC President Fraser s request for examples of ready-to-go projects in th ' ~ategories_se~ ~y our Board of Director~ ~-~ ..... ~ ~x . uongress of Cities last December. ~ ~z~ m~mmersnlp at our We are now in the process o~ tabulating these responses and providing them to the new administration as they make their final preparations for setting forth a national economic plan for the nation. I am pleased to report to you that we provided some of the many answers we have received to HUD secretary Henry Cisneros and to key economic officials at the White House. In addition, we met directly with President Clinton and key members of his economic team at the White House on February 5th to discuss the importance of our recommendations to the nation. Thanks to your help the President,s economic stimulus plan has included a number of your suggestions for revitalizing the nation,s local economies. The President has asked Congress to pass and have on his desk for signature a short term economic stimulus plan by the end of March. If Congress acts swiftly, I believe city leaders will have an opportunity to demonstrate they can make a difference by ensuring that these plans provide meaningful job opportunities and long term economic benefits to their communities. Thank you again. Sincerely, Donald j. Borut Executive Director Paat/%ll/~ta. Sidney ~arlhlllmy, Mayor. N~ Orleans, ~uisia~ Counci~o~t~r~, Denver. Colora0o ' ~: ~lph L Adm. ~ncil~m~r. Un~ers~ C~. Mi~ud · ~ ~ Mawr. K~lle, Ten~ss~ · ~ ~ ~ Dir~, ~ah ~g~ of Citi~ a~ To~s · J~my Bu~, Ma~. ~r Part Te~s ~P~ Commi~ion~. Da~. Ohio · PI~ E. ~lo, Mawr, Sun~e~. ~lfforn~ · ' ~l ~ ~Vln~, Mawr. Augusta. G~rgia · ~m E~ Me~r, Bra~nton. Flonda · M~ G~ ~er~n. No~h ~ R~t ~n~s · ~1 ~ ~ ~. ~. Min~ · Fre~l Hun~r, Ma~r, Fitchburg, W~onsin G. ~. ~ D~r~or, Maine Munici~l ~Jat~on · Mil~l Mi~ ~uncil ~m~r. M~O, Mmne~ta . ~ O. ~, ~r. ~. Te~ · ~ ~, Cou~il~. Boston, Me~ch~s · j. ~ ~ln. M~r, Ha~iesburg. Miss~ss~opi Mayor Pro Tern, ~, Te~s · Mi~ PInkl~ Council Mem~r. N~ Yo~ C~, N~ Y~ League of C~es · W~r~ S~n~y, Me~t Flint Michigan ~ Ta~, CouncillOr Ing~ Celiforn~ · DI~ ~m~, ~sessor. ~n Fre~. Call,hie · W~I~ Wi~, Mawr. ~nver, C~Oo · ~ W. ~. ~t~m~r. ~nt Wa~in~ ~ ~ ~m~ Mawr, Fmn~in ~ ~ ~ ~ W~. Councitlor, ~m~. Mas~ch~s · ~ O. Y~, Jr.. Mawr. **0,%, ey Minnesota 55124'8545 Telephone (612) 431-8800 Mayor Skip Johnson City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RWD MAR 3 0 1993 Dear Mayor Jolmsom At a City Council meeting on March 25, the Apple Valley City Council adopted the attached resolution opposing several pieces of legislation authored by Rep. Myron Orfield. The resolution urges the modification of these bills. to make them workable; or, if they ~nnot be successfully amended, we are urging their defeat. Rep. Orfield is to be commended for his efforts to address the important issues such as urban blight, inner-dry poverty, and substandard ho-sing- Regrettably, these bills as proposed fall far short of resolving the problem at the source and seek to penaliz~ suburban communities because of differing socio-economic demographics. Clearly, these bills fail to acknowledge the number of subsidized housing units and low-moderate income families act~ally in our communities. I am sure you are acutely aware of the content of these bills and their devastating effects on rapid-growth, outer- ring suburban communities. These bills give the Metropolitan Council sweeping authority over munidpalities in zoning and land use, threaten to jeopardize development that would expand the tax base with new housing and job creation opportunities, and halt major transportation projects needed in key areas of the region to relieve congestion. These bills are rapidly moving through the legislative procuress so time is of the essence. Please contact your legislators and those in neighboring districts to your city. Make sure they understand the effects this legislation has on your community and try to secure a commitment from them to either support amendments to remove the harmful provisions of these bills or vote against them entirely. Thonk you for your assistance on this vital issue. Working together, I am confident we will be able to'turn back these bills. If you have any questions, please contact me or Apple Valley City Administrator Thomas Melena. Sincerely, CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Willis E. Br~nnlng . Mayor WB:pjg Attachment Representative Tim Pawlenty Representative Eileen Tompldnx Senator Dave Knutson Home of the Minnesota Zoological Garden Senator Deanna Weiner (Printed on Recycled Paper) CITY OF APPLE VALLEY RESOLUTION NO. 1993-69 A RESOLUTION OPPOSING HOUSE FILES 622, 623, 641, 671 AND 677 AS INTRODUCED N THE MINNESOTA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DURING THE 1993 LEGISLATIVE SESSION. WHEREAS, Rep. Myron Orfield (DFL-Minneapolis) has introduced the above- listed bills relative to housing, metropolitan governance development controls and transportation, and ' , WHEREAS, the economies of the core cities of the Region and of the suburbs are interconnected and it is in the interest of the City of Apple Valley that the socio-economic problems of the core cities be resolved, and WHEREAS, the specific provisions of the legislation utilizes penalties excessively and incentives too sparingly to force suburban communities to resolve the socio-economic problems of the inner-regions of the metropolitan area, and ~EREAS, the legislation fails to attack the real problems of central cities such as confidence in the school systems, problems of the housing/jobs linkage, crime, concentrations of urban blight, and public transportation making the success of proposed solutions doubtful, and WHEREAS, the legislation fails to provide the resources necessary to achieve its intended goals by hindering housing opportunities and job creation in the suburban areas and by thwarting the development of regional transportation improvements, and W~EREAS, the legislation provides for an unnecessary intrusion by the Metropolitan Council into the local government sovereignty of zoning and land use decisions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Apple Valley that the City urges the Legislature to amend these bills to delete their harmful provisions so they can be passed and help to resolve the socio-economic problems of the inner-region of the metropolitan area, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if such legislation is not amended the City of Apple Valley urges the defeat of each of the above-mentioned bills, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if the Legislature approves such legislation in its current form, the City of Apple Valley urges Gov. Carlson to veto each bill. ADOPTED this 25th day of March, 1993. ATTEST. Mary E./Mueller, City Clerk ~. E. Branning, Mayor 12 a~3 alff 3 1)4I '-~ ~ MINNESOTA Department of Revenue Certificate of Real Estate Value PE-20 Buyer's last nome. first, m~dd[e india[ Present address Daytime phone numbe~ Seller's last name, ~irst. middle initial Address Daytime phone number Street address or rural route of property purchased City or township County Legal description of property purchased (Fill in Jul number, block number and plat name, or a.ach 3 copies of the legal descriptionJ Type of Acquisition (check all boxes which apply) [] YOU ar~ seller a*'e telat,ves [] Buyer is a rehg,ous or [] Your name added ~or co-owner's or r~at~ ~USlnes~ c~antable orgamzallO~ name rem~ed from d~ (not ~ You rece,v~ pro~ m a traOe ~ You conOemned or foreclos~ ~ Date purcha~d a~ment s~g~ If you checked any box above, skip the rest of this form, sign it and fill out sch~ule B Type of Property Transferred (check all boxes which apply) [] Land Only [] Land and Buddings Planned Use o! Property (check one box) ] Res~denbal (srngle. duplex, tr*plex) [] Apatlment (Number of units O Agr,cultural [] Cum merc~al-tnd ustrial (Type of business ~ Financial Arrangements (instructions are on back of yellow copy) 1 Total Purchase F~ce 2 Total Amount o! Personal Propelly {from schedule A on back of th~s sheet) ] Construction of a aery bUqding completed after January 1 of 'fear of sale [] Cabin Or Recreational ] Other Use (describe below) ) 3 Date Seae~ Agm~ to ~ Pnce 4 Down Payment 5 Points or Prepaid Interest Paid by Seller 6 Points Or Prepaid I~erest Pa~d by Buyer Is this a Conlract or Assumed Mortgage~ Yes NO Describe each mortgage and contract for deed used to purchase this property Mortgage or Contract lot Deed Monthly Payment for Interest Rate Total Number Amount at Purchase Principal and Interest (In Effect Now) of Payments Date o~ Any LumO Sum (Balloon) Payments 10 If a mortgage of contract tOt deed ~s not a varmble market rate but the terms of payment are scheduled fo change on a hxed date. till in its It~e numDer from above, the month and year ut the change, and what ~t wd[ change rD (or attach 3 cop~es of payment schedule) Fill out schedule B on the back of this sheet to determine the amount of your deed tax I declare thal the reformation fdleO m on th~$ turin Is true. correct and complete ID the best of my knowledge and behef,,,, F - ' Department of Revenue Use Only ,S~ck No 60004O0 LEN HARRELL Chief of Police MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472-0621 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 525-6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 Itaret~ 19, 1993 TO: }nvest igat'or Gary Lotion FROPI: Cf, ici Harrel I SUBJECT: Letter of Cornmendation C-,ary [_ottor~ has been assigned to invest ig~l: ions and course oP his duties has developed many contact, s ~ithin the community. Inv. Lotton started receiving reports of several l:hef'ts oF snowmobiles during our winter season of 1992-199j and t~ad primary responsibi 1 fry For invest igat lng those t. heFts. In February, 1993, LoLl:on developed an inFormdr, t, who had beerl krlowFi tO h. tle PO I i C:e' department ar, d uncooperative in the Past, and was able to wor-k with ti, is individual in locating several stolen snowmob i les ir~ Victoria, MN. Lotion worked ,-losely with the informant and was able to develop information regarding additional tl~ef-ts Frorn or:her commun i t i es; i nc Iud i~,g the trleFt of automobi I e.s. Working with investigators From Hermes, in and C:ar ,,er Counties, Lotton was able to acquire a search warrdnt For tl'~e Ira, me in Vic'toria. Several snc~wmobi les were recovered and parts From stolen Pontiac Fieros. A 25 ye.Jr old m.jrl [',e ~., r~ charged with "receiving and cc,,cea I in9 PrOpoF t y. " ]r~v. Lotton's di 1 igence and his abi 1 it-~ to ,-'L;~t ivat~: an unwi I I lng informant are to be commended. April 5, 1993 APR ? 1993 Municipal Offices 7701 County Road 110 West Minnetrista. MN 55364-9552 To: Park Directors & Parks Commissioners Along the Dakota Railroad Minnetrista proposal to meet with representatives of communities located along the Dakota Railroad to discuss future trail development along the Dakota Rail line. Just a reminder, that the city of Minnetrista is inviting all communities that contain the Dakota Railroad, to discuss possible future development of the railroad bed if/or when the railroad is abandoned or sold. The meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, April 13, 1993 at 7:00 pm, at the Minnetrista city Hall (7701 County Road 110 West). Railroad beds provide excellent opportunities for development of relatively inexpensive long distance trails. The major expense of grading is already completed when converting rails to trails. If and or when this particular railroad is abandoned or for sale, communities along the line should be prepared (if they so chose) to develop the railroad bed. The City of Minnetrista's Park and Open Space Plan within its Comprehensive Plan calls for the future development of a trail on the Dakota Railroad line. The Minnetrista Parks and Recreation Commission would like to determine how other communities propose to develop to railroad in the future. If you have any questions about the meeting, please call the City of Minnetrista at 446-1660. We hope to see you on April 13. Sincerely, Zoning Administrator cc: City of Wayzata City of Minnetonka Beach City of Mound City of Waconia City of New Germany City of South Silver Lake Carver County City of Orono City of Spring Park City of St. Bonifacius City of Mayer City of Lester Prairie City of Hutchinson McLeod County OFFICE 612-446-1660 ~ FAX 612-446-1311 · ,I RAIL-TRAIL Q & A 'l~e 12 Most FrcqucnUy Asked Ques;dons About Rail-Trails Ra~l-trails ~-¢ multi-I:)url:x~sc public paths o'ca~ccl fi'om ala~'~:)r~ rail corricloi~ Fiat or [ollowing a A~ lIN: traclcs If~ Ud~ I~ft In place? No. A~ a~t I~c railroad company t~lly removes If~ backs ~ ties for sa~ Generally cot~dor is th~n nc-graded Yvith ~ original ballast l~ft behincl by th~ railroad. Many, trmls arc lat~ wi~h asphalt, ~ ston~ ~ chi~s or ~ martial al:~Vol~i~c for b~ in~em~lecl I~ail ~ ~l~at does 'al~lndor~d- A r~lroad c~ridor is generally conside~ abandoned vd'Nm: (1) ~1S~C¢ is disconfinu~:l; (2) thc Inte~ta~ Commerce Commission (ICC) officially apl·roves U~ aban- ~t.- and (3) t~iffs (pay sche3:~ules) a~ canceJl~cl. A rail ~ ca~ be IL~jally abancloncd c~en if trades m~l ties ·nc still in place. Cc~, ~ if the trades a~ out it might not be abandoned. How can I find out If · cc)('dd~ Is Ictu~ly al~Bndonecl? /-~ ~i~~, avallabl~ at many ~ and map stores, diagrams all acUvc main r~c rail corridors by state. Thc RTC Citizm's Ma'K~, Cor/~crc~Raib ~o Tra~ls, availabl~ for S16.25 (S12 fo~ RTC member) cl~. scn~oes this l:)rocess in c~tail (and also contains apl~endices listing ~ agency con,acts for e~ch Do rall-lzalls cncoura~r¢ railroad abandonment? No. I~.~l-trails ~c built a/~erall possibilities for continuec:l rail se~vic~ have been exhausted. Rail-bails ~ linear corridor in public owne:s~p arcl pro~clc thc silv~ lining to th~ Izagic ch~lin~ in th~ nation's railroad r~ still one. of th~ most en~tonmenrally sou'~d fod~LS of b'~sportation. Y,~at Is 'rallbanlcln~' I~VJng (as d~fine~l by th~ National Trails System Act, 16 USC 1247(d)) is a ~:)lu~cary agr~men~ ~ a railroad compa'~, and a ~ agency to u~ ~ out-of-s~-vicc rail coridor as a trail un~il such time ~ U~ railroad might ~ tt~ corridor again for rail s~-vicc. Oecaus~ a banke~l cor~clor is not conside~e~l aban- ~, it can be sold, leased or dona~e~l to a trail manag~ without nc,,~'ting to ac~accnt I~. ~/ho owns the abandoned ¢oJ'Jldor b~fore It becomes ~ Izall? ~ip of a rail corricior is g~'~mally mix~cl, oRen including th~ railroad, fe~leral, stat~ or local ments, es ~,~cll as adjacent ~ Historically, wf~n ~ railroad built a linc iC bought some of U~ land and 'le~:~l' thc rest from adjacent larclowne~ or U'~ fcclcral gov~'nmenL When abcy~brN~l, a CO(Tidor roam rev~t to I~c leas~ holde~ and, in ef~ be owne~l by man), I:~O1~1¢. ~?lat IS · °pubic us~ condition' ·nd a 'c¢l~Icat¢ of Interim ball use'? Bobh anc docu'n~-~ U~at can be issued by If~ ICC cb. ring ~ abandonmen~ process. A public us~ concfi§on (PUC) gi~s I:~.Jblic agencies ~ i'ight to n~iat¢ c)cclusiv~Jy for 180 clays wil~l ~ railroad for pu'chas~ of an a~ corridor. During this time, ~, culv~l~, su'frac¢ material, and any oU~r features (~scnlial to building a trail mus~ be ~ intact. A ce~tificat~ of in~e~rn Ir·il us~ (CITU) permits U~ railroad and trail manager to r'~gotLat¢ f~ ~lbar~ng and us~ of bh~ linc for a Who ~.d~s ~ troll? c:~,.,~c:~s it using its own · groulo of citiz,,','t volu'~¢e~s has construct¢c:l a ball. Who m4nagres the tzalS? Trails anc generally man~ by local, sta~ or fcc~ral govenYnent agencies, but some are opemtex:! by ' . of orgaruz~t~ons, including non-profit 'friends of th~ t~ail° citizen groups, Iw'~l tnJsts, and comrnt~i~ ~/~ m thc balls Imt~d? As of Sel:Xemb~ 1990, RTC has ic~ntifi~x:1279 ~l-trails in 35 st~t~, wiU~ a total length of al:~:xoxJmat¢ly 3°200 miles. An additional 3&5 ~ll I:~OjeCts arc in progress, with new projects beginning e~ch y~m. [For a direetcry of 245 of th~ ~ rail-traits, ~ IffC's RTC m~nber~), post~je paid.] ~ Guicte to,~ne~c~'~/~ail-Trail$, available for $6.75 ¢$5 for I want to ~t Inv~m:ll ~/~m de I stm't? If you'nc not a m~'nb~ of I~TC, no~ is th~ time to I::~com¢ on~ ,M~'nt:~hil~ c~ h~ll~ finance much of RTC's ongo~g activities to pre~v~ lt~ n~ion's rail co~ f~ public lrails. Tojcfin RTC, ~ $18 (h~ffntiduel)0 $25 (f~nily) or $3S (s~taining) to Rails-to-Trails Cons~, Scit~ 300, 1400 Sixteenl~ Stncet, colby of U~ RTC Fact S~ How to C.~et/~ ~/~ ~ ~il~to-Trwils/~ $2.$0 ¢ $1.75 for RAIl. BANKING: V~'IAT, WHERE, WHY, WHEN AND HOW? In 1983, conc~m~ by th~ rapid conlraction of Arn~ca's rail ~ tt~ U.S. Conflr~ss th~ National Trails ~st~n Act to create th~ railbank3~J program. Railbankinfl is a method by ~4~ich lines proposed for abandonmer~ ffi I:~ p~d tt~:~Jh interim conve~on to recreatior~ I~il Ifth~ title to an obout-to-be-abando~d rail corridor is in que~ion and the~ is any interest whatsoeve' in trail use, lt~ line s~ould be railbanJ~d to inst~e that the opportuni~ is not lost. the rove-se side of this fact sheet is a 'boileq~late' letter which can be used to file a rairoanl6r~J and pubr,: use condition reques~ wi~ ~ Inte~e Commerce Commission. Some mil corridom conl~,in rev~s~ to adjacent land ownem which I:~come effectiv~ as soon es ~ ei:~n~en~ is consummated. ~, if tJ~ line is reill~nked, the corridor were no~ abandoned. As a result, ttm int~rity of the corridor is n~int~ined and any which could bre~k it up into sm~ll p'~ces ere prew. nted. RaJlberlkir~ can be requesl~d by either a public agency or a qualified private organization. reill~nkin~ request mus~ be sam to the Intersme Comrnece Commission in Weshin~on ~ mus~ at ~he v~y minimum include a 'Statement of ~illinsness to Assume Financial ResponsJbilit~ (see revere side). Since the abandoning railroad company must agree to nesotiate a railbankimJ ageement~ a copy of the request for r~ilbankJncj must be served on the railroad at the s~me time is sent to the ICC. ^'Public Use Cond~cion' (PUC) is different but cornplementa~ to a request for reilbankir~j. If e resson~ble PUC request is rn~de to the ICC, the Commission will place a restriction on the aban- donment which prevents the railroad company from selling off or othene~ise disposing of property or ITail-related sb~'ures such es bridges or culverts for a period of 180 d~ys from effective date of the abandonment. This public use condition gives the prospective tzail n~neser some breathing room for preparing an offer to the railroad. ('~e public use concrKJon good back-Up device should the railroad nc~ agree to raJlbanking since the ICC will issue public use conditJons r~rdless of whaler or not the railroad agrees.) There are several other important points regerdir~j railbankir~3: 1. A railbanking request is not a con~'act and does not comm'R the interested party to acquire any prope'ty or to accept any r~bility. It inv'Res negotiation with the railroad company under the umbrella of railbanking. A party filing a "Statement of Willingness to Assume Financial Responsibil- ity' is not accepting any financial responsibility. It is merely expressing an interest in possibly 2. The tracks and ties on a raJibanlced line can be removed. Hov,~,ver, brk~3es and trestles must remain in place, and no permanent structures can be built on the right-of-w~. 3. Under railbankinfl there will likely still be an actual sale of the property and the railroad will likely still want compensation. Railbanking is not generally a method for obtaining a free trail. 4. A railbanked rrm is subject to possible future restc~tion of rail se~ce. Any railroad can apply to the ICC to resume rail se~ce on a railbanked corridor. H~, if the ICC restores rail sendce, the trail agency is entitled to fair market value for the co~idor. The terms and concrRions of a transfer back to rail service would be determined by the ICC. 5. Th~ attach~ letter can only be flied on a line which is still under the authority of th~ ICC. Generally, th~ ICC loses authority 30 d~/s after the effectiv~ date of an abandonment. A more thorough discussk~n of rairoanking and other legal issues related to rails-to.traiis conv~ior~ is available in ~ RTC LegalMenuelwhich is available from RTC for $43.95 (32.50 for RTC members). Send orders to Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, Shipping Department, P.O. Box 295, Federalsl:x~, MD 21632-029S. For tex~ of 'boilerplate' letter, see other side. -over- CITY OF MOUND SPRING IS HERE!! IT'S TIME TO CLEAN UP THE NEIGHBORHOODS OF MOUND AND TAKE PRIDE IN YOUR PROPERTY AND YOUR COMMUNITY HERE'S HOW: THE CITY OF MOUND IS AGAIN SPONSORING: PRING CLEAN P AND RECYCLIN DA Y ! SATURDAY - APRIL 24, 1993 - 8 AM TO 5 PM SUNDAY - APRIL 25, 1993 - 10 AM TO 5 PM AT THE LOST LAKE AREA ON COUNTY ROAD 15 BETWEEN SUPERAMERICA AND THE POST OFFICE CLEAN OUT YOUR CLOSETS! CLEAN OUT YOUR BASEMENT! CLEAN OUT YOUR GARAGE! CLEAN OUT YOUR YARDI TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO BEAUTIFY YOUR PROPERTY YOU'LL BE GLAD YOU DIDll A COMPLETE LIST OF WHAT TO RECYCLE AND THE COSTS ARE ON THE FLIP SIDE OF THIS FLIER/./ ANY QUEST/ONS, CALL C/TY HALL A T 472-0600 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE ACCEPTED: GOODWILL; MATTRESS: FURNITURE: CARPET; TIRES: APPLIANCES: SCRAP METAL: DROP OFF ITEMS AS FOLLOWS: CLOTHING, SMALL WORKING APPLIANCES, GAMES DOMESTIC ITEMS (PANS, DISHES, ETC.), HARDWARE TOOLS, LAMPS .... ·* THERE IS NO CHARGE ** THERE IS A CHARGE BY SIZE: CRIB $3, SINGLE $5, DOUBLE $6, QUEEN $7, KING $8 CHAIRS $3, RECLINERS $5, LOVESEAT COUCH $6, SOFA $10, HIDE-A-BED SOFA $15 50 CENTS PER SQUARE YARD $1 EACH, $1.50 WITH RIM $7 EACH this includes washers, dryers, stoves, fumaces, dishwashers, refrigerators, freezers... $15 for AIR CONDITIONERS SWING SETS, LAWN FURNITURE, GRILLS, BICYCLES, AUTO PARTS, SPRINGS, PIPE, METAL WINDOW FRAMES, AUTO BATTERIES, ETC. ** NO CHARGE ·· ELECTRONICS: $4 EACH TELEVISIONS, STEREOS, VCRS, COMPUTERS; NO CHARGE FOR: TELEPHONES, RADIOS, CAMCORDERS, TAPE PLAYERS, THIS INCLUDES RECHARGEABLE AND CORDLESS APPLIANCES PHONE BOOKS: A CONTAINER WILL BE PROVIDED AT NO CHARGE BATTERIES; HOUSEHOLD BATTERIES ** FREE ** NEW BINS; IF YOU BRING IN YOUR BROKEN RECYCLING BIN, WE WILL REPLACE IT OR YOU MAY PURCHASE NEW ONES FOR $6 BRUSH: $3 PER CUBIC YARD, $9 A TRUCK LOAD UP TO 12" IN DIAMETER, INCLUDES DOCK SECTIONS, AND SCRAP WOOD {BRUSH PILE W1LL BE OPEN THROUGH MAY} City OF MOUND The City of Mound is pleased to provide these special Recycling Day. We would like to make the recycling of items easy for you. Please fill out the questionnaire below and return it to City Hall. Thanks for your participationll 1. Should there be special recycling days twice a year? Yes 2. Should the recycling days be in the fall and spring? Yes 3. Is the scheduled Saturday and Sunday convenient for you? Yes 4. What days would be better? M T W Th F Sat Sun 5. Did you participate in previous special recycling days? Yes 6. How did you learn of this special recycling event? Laker Sailor City Contact Flyer Other 7. Were you surprised at the variety of recyclable you could bring? Yes 8. How did you dispose of these items before the special Recycling days? No No No No No Was there anything you had to return home with that you could not recycle? What was it? 10. How could we improve this service? 11. Do you think the costs were reasonable? Yes 12. Do you think the location was convenient? Yes 13. Do you know about the Hennepin County Transfer Station Drop off Site in Brooklyn Park, that is open all year? 14. What city are you from? No and Hazards Yes No PLEASE RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE TO MOUND CITY HALL BY MAY 7, 1993 and THANK YOUll