The URL can be used to link to this page

2004-04-13 PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 2004; 7:30 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Ay(enda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page 1. Open meeting - Pledge of Allegiance Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent Agenda *A. Approve minutes: March 23, 2004 regular meeting March 30, 2004 special meeting *B. Approve payment of claims 844-846 847 848-901 *C. *D. *E. *F. *G. Set special meetings: 1. Approve Joint PC/CC Workshop: Apr 26, 7-9:00 Approve special meeting for tour of Parks facility and presentation related to Public Works Facility: May 18, 6:30 Approve Payment Request No. 4 from Environmental Associates for $73,615.75 for Lost Lake Greenway Project Approve Public Gathering Permit for Minnetonka Classic Bass Tournament weigh-in at Mound Bay Park - June 5, 2004. Approve Public Gathering Permit and Transient Merchant License as requested by Mark Lee for Art-in-the-Park (Mound Bay Park) Approve Transient Merchant License: Northwest Tonka Lions, for food vending at Mound Bay Park on certain dates as requested Approve agreement related to Avalon Park Approve Highland Park Grant local government resolution Approve condemnation settlement with Balboa Center Limited Partnership, et al, regarding driveway easement 902-907 908-914 915-920 921-922 923-927 928-930 931-933 *K. *L. Approve resolution vacating a portion of Kells Lane to include legal description Approve resolution authorizing submittal of Transit Oriented Development (TOD) grant application to Hennepin County for multi-use parking deck in downtown 934-940 941-945 COUNCIL BRIEFING April 13, 2004 ~'Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Apr 13 - 7.30 - CC regular meeting Apr 17 - 10:30 - Mound Visions Update - Gillespie Center Apr 27 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Apr 27 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Apr 29 - 6:30 - Disaster training May 15 - 8:00-3:00 - Recycling Day - Minnetrista Public Works May 22 - 10:00-2:00 - City Silent Auction of Surplus Goods - City Hall June 5 - 3:00-12:00 - Fish Fry June 6- DARE Open June 18 - 8:00 a.m. - City Golf Outing Upcominp Absences Apr 19-25 Pat Meisel May 12-14 Kandis Hanson Conference Apr 12-15 Bonnie Ritter Training Apr 12-15 Jodi Rahn Training Labor Negotiations Patrol Unit mediation: Apr 13 Public Works Unit mediation: Apr 16 Sergeant's Unit arbitration: to be determined CtPersonel Openings Public Works Worker - Water Division - interviews- Apr 19 Building Official - no adds running as of yet - contracted coverage starting Apr 15 Realtor's Day Sarah and I will share a presentation to realtors for CEU's with the planner from Minnetrista, sponsored by Community Ed. We will bring them up to date on Mound development and explain land use procedures that influence their activity in the two cities. Developer Interest About once a week we hear from developers wanting to do a project in Mound. Most are very prestigious names and couldn't be lured here in our requests for proposals. They usually request confidentiality. Our time is spent providing them with site options for their specific development plans. Isn't it interesting that now all eyes are on Mound! Very exciting! Sever Weather Awareness Week April 19-23 C Wine Tasting The report for the wine tasting event will be put out within the next two week, once all the bills are in. Thank you for your attendance and support for this event! We hope you enjoyed yourselves and thought it a class act! C MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 23, 2004 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, March 23, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Phil Jensen, Connie Meyer, Bruce Johnson, Danene Provencher. Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll carl vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open Meeting - Pledqe of Alleqianco Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm., and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 2. Approve Aqenda Mayor Meisel requested the addition of Item 3G, Tree Removal and Treatment Licenses, and removal of Item 7, Visit from Senator Gen Olson. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve minutes of March 9, 2004. B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $223,354.58. C. Approve set-up license for Al & Alma's Supper Club D. Approve request for imprest funds increase in Finance Department from $175 to $350, and in P&I Department from $100 to $200. E. RESOLUTION NO. 04-37: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE LOT 3, BLOCK 2, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT F- PID #13-0117-24-34.0086 F. Approve special meeting with staff for disaster training for April 29 at 6:30 p.m. G. Approve Tree Removal and Treatment Licenses (contingent upon receipt of all proper application forms, fees and certificates of insurance) for: Amberwood, Inc., Bear Tree Care, Emery's Tree Service, Rainbow Tree Co., Rob's Tree Care, Shady Wood Tree Experts, Shorewood Tree Service, Tree Top Service, Viking Land Tree Service, Legacy Tree Service, Aaspen Tree Service, Above Ground & Beyond, Ray's Tree Serice, Stumpf's Tree Service, Roger's Tree Service, Tall Timber Tree Service, Asplundh Tree Co. 1 -844- Mound Council Minutes - March 23, 2004 4. Comments & Suaqestions from Citizens Present on any Item not on the A.qenda. Bruce Johnson of 4458 Denbigh Road approached the podium to speak. Councilmember Hanus stepped down from his position at the Council dais for this discussion. Johnson thanked the Council for their support in the process of release of a tax-forfeited property adjacent to his, and two of his neighbors', property. Connie Meyer of 4731 Carlow Road approached the Council, stating that she was interested when she saw that Senator OIson was on the agenda and came to the meeting to find out where this parcel was located. Osmek described the location of the parcel and Meisel stated that not only the Council, but all appropriate commissions and staff also supported this release of tax forfeit property. Osmek stepped down from the Council dais to approach the public podium to provide the history and path that this request has taken. He also presented examples of similar situations in other Counties in the State, where the release of tax forfeited property had occurred. Osmek indicated that if people were opposed to this property release, they should attend the various commission and council meetings to voice their concerns and get answers to their questions, instead of using the editorial page in the newspaper. Meyer stated that part of the subject property is in front of Councilmember Hanus' house and it is now being discussed because Senator Olson introduced legislation that would allow Hanus and the other two applicants to obtain the land. Discussion continued with the council members voicing their varying viewpoints. Councilmember Hanus returned to his seat on the Council. 5. Action on Resolution Findinq No Relationship with Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the Xcel Ener_clV Land Exchan_cle MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-38: RESOLUTION FINDING NO RELATIONSHIP WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - XCEL LAND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT 6. Action on Resolution Findin,q No Relationship with Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the Custer purchase a.qreement MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 2 -845- C RESOLUTION NO. 04-39: RESOLUTION FINDING NO RELATIONSHIP WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - CUSTER PURCHASE AGREEMENT Mound Council Minutes - March 23, 2004 7. (removed) 8. 2003 Assessment Report by Phil Jensen, Hennepin County Assesso~ Phil Jensen reviewed the 2004 Assessment Valuation of Mound, stating that the Estimated Market Value as of 3/10/04 is $1,049,951.00, the first year for Mound to reach the $1 million mark. He went on to review the residential assessment growth, as well as comparisons to other cities. He informed the Council that his department will have an office at Mound City Hall, and will also house the records for Minnetrista, Spring Park and Tonka Bay here. No action needed on this item. 9. Information/Miscellaneous A. Correspondence: LMCD B. LMC Friday Fax C. Letter: Bond rating increase by Standard & Poors D. Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative E. Report: Finance Department- Feb 2004 F. Letter: Public Hearing at Hennepin County on railroad encroachments G. Minutes: DCAC- March 18, 2004 10. Adjourn MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adjourn at 8:15 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel C 3 -846- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 30, 2004 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Tuesday, March 30, 2004, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus and David Osmek. Members Absent: Councilmember Peter Meyer Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Parks Superintendent Jim Fackler, Liquor Store Manager John Colotti, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Police Chief Jim Kurtz, Finance Director Gino Businaro, Public Works Superintendent Greg Skinner, Fire Chief Greg Pederson 1. Open Meeting Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. 2. Department Head Annual Reports Department Heads were given fifteen minutes each to present highlights from their annual reports and answer any questions that the Council had. The reports are on file with the City Clerk in their entirety. A. Police Department- Police Chief Jim Kurtz B. Fire Departament- Fire Chief Greg Pederson C. Finance Department- Finance Director Gino Businaro D. City Clerk's Department- City Clerk Bonnie Ritter E. Community Development-Community Development Director Sarah Smith F. Public Works - Public Works Director Carlton Moore 1. Streets and Utilities - Public Works Superintendent Greg Skinner 2. Park Department- Parks/Docks Superintendent Jim Fackler G. Liquor Store - Manager John Colotti 3. Adiourn MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adjourn at 9:00 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -847- ..APRIL 13~ 2004 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 032404SUE $338,769.79 MAR 033104CARD $6,460.32 MAR 033104SUE $21,063.43 APR 040704SU E $38,789.11 APR 041304S U E$586,784.08 APR TOTAL $991,866.73 -848- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: March 2004 03/24/04 1:42 PM Page 1 Batch Name Refer 32404 Cash Payment Invoice 032404 032404SUE User Dollar Amt $338,769.79 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $338,769.79 $0.00 In Balance BERENT, BRIAN E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 03-26-04 FIRE SCHOOL, DULUTH 3/24/2004 $325.00 Total $325.00 Refer 32404 CUSTER, KENNETH Cash Payment E 455-46383-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA PURCHASE OF 5533 SHORELINE DRIVE$332,499.00 Invoice 032404 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Ceils 03-04 472-0646 $19,58 Invoice 032404 3/24/2004 Transaction Date 3/19/2004 Refer 32404 HARDINA, DAMON Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical invoice 032404 3~24~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT Total $19.58 $751.30 :ransact on Date 3,2412004 Wells Fargo ¢ 1..,,oL.~ ~t~l, ~7~,1.30 Cash Payment E 455-46383-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA STATE DEED TAX 5533 SHORELINE DRIVE $1,405.90 Invoice 032404 3~24~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,405.90 Refer 32404 KESTNER, AL Cash Payment E 602-49450-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 032404 3/24/2004 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT Wells Fargo 10100 $150.00 Total $150.00 Refer 32404 MYERS, TONY Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training Invoice 032404 3/24/2004 03-26-04 FIRE SCHOOL DULUTH $325.00 Total $325.00 Refer 32404 PETTY CASH _ Cash Payment G 101-10200 Petty Cash INCREASE PETTY CASH $125.00 invoice 032404 3/24/2004 Cash Payment G 101-10300 Change Fund INCREASE PETTY CASH $150.00 invoice 032404 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $275.00 Refer 32404 POUNDER, CHRISTOPHER Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 03-23-04 FIRE SCHOOL DULUTH $325.00 Invoice 032404 3/24/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $325.00 Refer 32404 SBC MINNCOMM PAGING Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. 03-04 PAGERS $119.76 Invoice 20233303047 3/1/2004 -849- ~_.-_... City of Mound 03/24/04 1:42 PM ×~ ,~, '% Page 2 ,/ Jif \ Payments CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $119.76 Refer 32404 ST. LOuis cOUNTY SHERRiFF Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow WT #2040073 BALANCE DUE $50.00 Invoice 032404 3/24/2004 Transaction Date 3/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 ~;ier 32404 WoYT~KE, ~ENNi~ ~i " Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 03-26-04 FIRE SCHOOL DULUTH $325.00 Invoice 032404 3/24/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $325.00 Refer 32404 xoEi_E~ERGy Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electdc Utilities 02-04 #2170-989-449-058 $1,319.55 Invoice 032404 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-381 Electric Utilities 02-04 #2170-989-449-058 $879.70 Invoice 032404 3/24/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 455 TIF 1-2 602 SEWER FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $1,975.58 $2,739.31 $333,9O4.90 $150.00 $338,769.79 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $338,769.79 $0.00 $338,769.79 -850- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 033104CRCARD Payments Refer 8 ELAN CREDIT CARD Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 City of Mound 04/01/04 1:11 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: March 2004 User Dollar Amt $6,460.32 Computer Dollar Amt $6,460.32 $0.00 In Balance Ck# 095082 3/31/2004 E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training OX YOKE LUNCH MEETING 2/18/2004 E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training OX YOKE LUNCH MEETING 2/18/2004 E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training MRWA CONFERENCE 3/31/2004 E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training MRWA CONFERENCE 3/31/2004 E 602-49450~434 Conference & Training MRWA CONFERENCE 3/31 / 1940 E 101-42400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA PC SIMONEAU, MATT 3/31/2004 E 101-42400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LAPTOP, DELL 3/31/2004 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 3/31/2004 E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 3/31/2004 E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 3/31/2004 E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies 3/31/2004 E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 3/31/2004 E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies 3/31/2004 E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies 3/31/1940 E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies 3/31/2004 E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA DVD PLAYER, OFFICE DEPOT 3/31/2004 E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 3/31/2004 E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 3/31/2004 E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies 3/31/2004 E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training 3/31/2004 ORNAMENTS, SNYDER CONFERENCE, JAKUBIK REGISTERATION JAKUBIK OFFICE DEPOT, OFFICE MAX SUPPLIES LAW ENFORCEMETN MEMORIAL, HORIZONS LIMITED BEST BUY SUPPLIES OFFICE DEPOT SUPPLIES RETURN BEST BUY PAPER PRODUCTS, MENARDS MEETING EXPENSE, RICKS SUPERVALUE BLANKETS FOR BOOKING RM, WAL-MART CLERKS CONFERENCE REGISTRATION, RITTER 10100 Total $13.15 $13.14 $370.00 $370.00 $147.98 $1,615.63 $1,379.18 $821.76 $317.40 $590.00 $192.54 $106,75 $48.97 $10.65 -$48.97 $191.64 $29.46 $49.54 $41.50 $2OO.OO $6,460.32 -851 - CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: March 2004 10100 Wells Fargo $4,007.50 $1,742.30 $370.00 $147.98 $192.54 $6,460.32 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $6,460.32 $0.00 $6,460.32 04/01/04 1:11 PM Page 2 -852- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: March 2004 Batch Name 033104SUE Payments Refer 33104 GUSTAFSON, BRUCE Cash Payment Invoice 033104 03/31/04 11:33 AM Page 1 User Dollar Amt $21,063.43 Computer Dollar Amt $21,063.43 $0.00 In Balance E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 04-03-04 LEADERSHIP II $250.00 Refer 33104 HENNEPIN COUNTY' TREASURER Cash Payment E 101-41500-300 Professional Srvs 2004 PROCESSING ASSESSMENTS $425.75 Invoice 10-44720-671500 3/19/2004 Transact on Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $425.75 Refer 33104 HENTGES, MATTHEW Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 04-03-04 LEADERSHIP II $250.00 invoice 033104 3/31/2004 Transaction Date 3/31/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 33104 KESTNER, AL Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $107.68 invoice 033104 3/31/2004 Refer 33104 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T _ Cash Payment E 101-41110-361 General Liability Ins OPEN MEETING LAW $590.00 invoice 15612 3/31/2004 Transaction Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $590.00 Refer 33104 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Cash Payment E 101.43100-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION, MOORE, CARLTON $13.33 invoice 1-16525 3/16/2004 Cash Payment E 601~49400-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION, MOORE, CARLTON $3.33 Invoice 1-16525 3/16/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION, MOORE, CARLTON $3.34 Invoice 1-16525 3/16/2004 Refer 33104 ROGERS, RICHARD Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 04-02-04 ADVANCE SEARCH/RESCUE $250.00 Invoice 033104 3/31/2004 Transact on Date 3/31/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tote .... ~,,0.00 Refer 33104 SUPERIOR FORD FLEET/GOVERN Cash Payment E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA F350 4X4 CHASSIS PICKUP TRUCK $18,696,00 Invoice 17256 3/24/2004 PO 18194 Transaction Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18,696.00 Refer 33104 TRAINING OF OFFICERS, ASSOCI Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 04-12-04 REGISTRATION,NICCUM $425.00 Invoice 033104 3/31/2004 PO 18175 Transaction Date 3/31/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $425.00 Refer 33104 WESTONKA COMMUNITY EDUCA T -853- C C C~ Cash Paymen[ Invoice 18282 City of Mound Payments 03/31/04 11:33 AM Page 2 Current Period: March 2004 E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training EXCEL CLASS $49.00 3/31/1940 PO 18282 Transaction Date 3~30~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $49.00 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $20,306.76 $750.00 $3.33 $3.34 $21,063.43 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $21 ,O63.43 $o.oo $21,063.43 -854- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 040704SUE Payments Refer 40704 BUSINARO, GINO Cash Payment Invoice 040704 Transaction Date City of Mound 04/07/04 8:04 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: April 2004 User Dollar Amt $38,789.11 G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 4/7/2004 4/1/2004 Computer Dollar Amt $38,789.11 $0.00 In Balance 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $449.87 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $449.87 Refer 40704 DRIVER AND VEHICLE SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 1FTSF31PO4EC87594 LICENSE $1,248.74 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 4/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,248.74 Refer 40704 HANSON, KANDIS Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 02-04 DSL LINE $49.95 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 03-04 DSL LINE $49.95 Invoice 040704 4/7/2002 Cash Payment E 601-49400-430 Miscellaneous PLANTS $25.00 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-430 Miscellaneous PLANTS $25.00 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41310-430 Miscellaneous PLANTS $113.66 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $263.56 Refer 40704 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T Cash Payment E 101-41110-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $1,352.58 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41310-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $419.47 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $539.32 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $99.30 Invoice 040704 4/712004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $2,934.58 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42115-361 General Liability ins GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $44.52 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $513.64 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $3,247.90 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $217.44 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $732.79 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $3,929.33 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $4,198.13 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 -855- City of Mound 04/07/04 8:04 AM Page2 Payments CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 040704 Cash Payment Invoice 040704 Cash Payment Invoice 040704 Current Period: April 2004 E 601-49400-361 General Liability Ins 4/7/2004 E 602-49450-361 General Liability Ins 4/7/2004 E 281-45210-361 General Liability Ins 4/712004 GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $3,066.42 GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE GEN LIABILITY INSURANCE $3,066.42 $433.16 Transaction Date 3/30/2004 ~ Wells Fargo 10100 Total $24,795.00 Refer ~07°~4 N°RTHEi~N ES~ROW, iNcO~OR Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03~31-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $10,920.00 Invoice 040704 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10 920.00 Cash Payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA CITYHALL SIGNS $934.50 Invoice 1140 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $934.50 Cash Payment G 101-22916 1975 Lakeside Lane sub-OK)3 CELL PHONES $49.64 Invoice 040704 Cash Payment ~lnvoice 040704 ~L.~iCash Payment Invoice 040704 Cash Payment Invoice 040704 Transaction Date 3/31/2004 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONES $53.25 CELL PHONES $21.30 CELL PHONES $53.25 10100 Wells Fargo $13,051.10 $3,929.33 $433.16 $10,920.00 $3,112.72 $3,144.67 $4,198.13 $38,789.11 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $38,789.11 $0.00 $38,789.11 -856- CiTY OF MOUND Batch Name 041304SUE Payments City of Mound 04~09~04 9:56 AM Page Payments Current Period: April 2004 User Dollar Ami $586,784.08 $586,784.08 $0.00 In Balance Computer Dollar Amt Refer 41304 ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SQUAD #842 EQUIPMENT $156.85 Invoice 7251 2/11/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SQUAD #842 EQUIPMENT $38.34 Invoice 7009 4/13/2004 PO 17872 Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SQUAD #842 EQUIPMENT $31.02 Invoice 7424 4/13/2004 PO 18151 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $226.21 Refer 41304 AHLSTROM, LARK Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE' $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 ALAND, ROBERT Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13~2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 ALDEN POOL AND MUNICIPAL SU Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals AS VALVE, HEAVY DUTY $94.79 Invoice 400896 3/8/2004 Transaction Date 3/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $94.79 Refer 41304 AMCON Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 02-04 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES $1,354,13 Invoice 2495 2/29/2004 Cash Payment E 496.46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 02-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $29,783.47 Invoice 2492 1/30/2004 Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-31-04 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES $176.06 Invoice 033104-1 3/31/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $31,313.66 Refer 41304 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INCO Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. PAGER REPAIRS $316.93 invoice 58493 3/25/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $316.93 Refer 41304 ANTHONYS FLORAL Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous FUNERAL PLANT $30.00 Invoice 20561 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4~5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $30.00 Refer 41304 APF EMERGENCY REPAIR Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTIONS $246.50 Invoice 504429 3/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTIONS $86.50 Invoice 504429 3~26~2004 -857- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 04/09/04 9:56 AM Page 2 Payments Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Contract VEHICLE INSPECTIONS Invoice 504429 3/26/2004 Transaction Date 3/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 41304 ARBOGAST, MATTHEW Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo Refer 41304 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 463407611 3/16/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 463408411 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 463409011 3/30/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 463409815 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $224.16 Refer 41304 ASPEN EMBROiDERy~ND ~/G Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous EMBROIDER FIRE INSPECTOR $25.09 nvoice 030804 3/8/2004 %~,,~Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous EMBROIDER LOGO $39.07 Invoice 030804 3/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms EMBROIDER MOUND LOGO $12.78 Invoice 030904 3/9/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms REMOVE NAMES $23.96 Invoice 032704 3/27/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.90 Cash Payment E ~0~-4a~00-S00 Capital Outlay (~ENE~ BANDIT OHIPPER $25,824.12 Invoice ~la~80~ a/12/2004 PO 1821~ gash Paymenl E ~0~-4a~00-S00 Oapita~ Outlay (~ENE~ B~DE8 FOR COMPRESSOR $344.~3 Invoice 93293~ 3/29/2004 PO 18261 Transaction Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $26 ~68 75 Cash Payment E 101~3100-210 Operating Supplies 03-04 WATER SERVICE $23.32 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 03-04 WATER SERVICE $23.32 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 602~9450-210 Operating Supplies 03-04 WATER SERVICE $23.32 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110~30 Miscellaneous 03-04 WATER SERVICE ~10264300 $69.96 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $139 92 ~ment R 281-34725 Dock Permits - REFUND DOCK APPLICATION $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 $46.50 Total $379.50 $25O.OO 10100 Total $250.00 $42.84 $66.84 $42.84 $71.64 -858- CITY OF MOUND Refer 41304 BELIVEAU, TIM City of Mound 04/09/04 9:56 AM Page 3 Payments Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits DOCK REFUND FEE $250.00 invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ...... '~"*~,uU-00 Refer 41304 BELLBOY CORPORA TION Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE $115.54 Invoice 38222100 3~26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $492.00 Invoice 29022000 3/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,034.25 Invoice 29002100 3/22/2004 Cash payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,896.95 Invoice 29067300 3/29/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $965.25 Invoice 29133900 4/5/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT--LIQUOR -$71.71 Invoice 28941600-B 3/15/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6.432.28 Refer 41304 BERLIN, MARGARET Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Refer 41304 BESLER, WADE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250,00 Refer 41304 BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC. Cash Payment E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 03-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $60.14 invoice 040300 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 03-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $33.24 Invoice 040300 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 03-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $33.24 Invoice 040300 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 03-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $33.25 Invoice 040300 4/13~2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 03-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $42.38 Invoice 040300 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 03-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $28.25 Invoice 040300 4/13~2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 03-04 MAIN STREET $22,15 Invoice 040300 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 03-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $19.42 Invoice 040300 4/13/2004 Transact on Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ?~2.07 Refer 41304 BIELKE, SCOTT Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 -859- .~___.... City of Mound 04/09/04 9:56 AM "' ,i~[~ Page4 /" ~ Payments CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 3~26~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 BOLL, DANIEL Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $261.25 Refer 41304 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUP Cash Payment E 101-43100-223 Building Repair Supplies FLUORESCENT BULBS $28.54 Invoice 93553247 3/8/2004 PO 18255 Cash Payment E 601-49400-223 Building Repair Supplies FLUORESCENT BULBS $28.54 Invoice 93553247 3/8/2004 PO 18255 Cash Payment E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies FLUORESCENT BULBS $28.55 Invoice 93553247 3/8/2004 PO 18255 Cash Payment E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services OVERHEAD BULBS $75.08 ~l¢"~lnvoice 93498906 2/512004 PO 18147 ~,,jlCash Payment E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply OVERHEAD BULBS $263.27 Invoice 93498906 2/2/2004 PO 17998 Cash Payment E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply OVERHEAD BULBS $76.61 Invoice 93571451 3/17/2004 PO 17998 Transaction Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $500.59 Refer 41304 BOYLE, MICHAEL Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 BRECKE, MICHELLE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment G 101-22916 1975 Lakeside Lane sub-#03 CLOSE ESCROW $373.10 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/7/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $373.10 Refer 41304 BUILDING MATERIAL SUPPLY, INC Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-31-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $1,200.00 nvoice041304 4/13/2004 ~-" ~ransaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 200.00 -860- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 04/09/04 9:56 AM Page 5 Payments Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHE Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract JAN,FEB,MAR CJDN CONNECT CHARGE $630.00 Invoice MN027130041 3/30/2004 Transaction Date 4/7/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $630.00 Refer 41304 CARDIAC SCIENCE Cash Payment E 101-42110-220 Repair/Maint Supply USB ADAPTOR CORD/SOFTWARE $94.95 Invoice 516397 3/25/2004 PO 18172 Transaction Date 4/7/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $94.95 Refer 41304 CARLSON, JONATHAN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 CARLSON, SHERRI Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE _ Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SQUAD #842 TIRES $29.51 Invoice N26639 2/12/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SQUAD #842 TIRES $184.66 Invoice N26629 2/12/2004 Transaction Date 3/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $214.17 Refer 41304 CAT AND FIDDLE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $343.00 Invoice 38595 3/19/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $343.00 Refer 4E+06 CENTENNIAL CARPER SERVICES, _ Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings CARPET CLEANING $1,491.00 Invoice 041304 3/27/2004 Transaction Date 3/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,491.00 Refer 41304 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities 02-18-04 THRU 03-17-04 GAS UTILITIES $1,622.23 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-383 Gas Utilities 02-18-04 THRU 03-17-04 GAS UTILITIES $1,081.48 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,703.71 Refer 41304 CHADWICK AND MERTZ Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 03-04 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $5,515.80 Invoice 041304 4/2/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,515.80 Refer 41304 CHAMBERS, REG -861 - CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 04/09/04 9:56 AM Payments Page 6 Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $250 00 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies HEATSHRINK Invoice D-246559 3/6/2004 $12.74 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies BA'FTERY Invoice D-246594 3/6/2004 $123.39 Cash Payment E 101-45200404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BRAKE CONTROLLER $84.15 Invoice D-249817 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery ACCESSORYS Invoice D-250133 4/2/2004 $166.11 Transaction Date 4/7/2004 , Wells Fargo 10100 Total $386 39 R~fer ~4i304 'C~i~TEN~EN 'G~ ' ......... Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 $15.00 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $265.00 ~"~Ref~; 41304 C~RiSTENSE~ K~NT- - REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 $7.50 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Cash Payment Invoice 31734 Cash Payment Invoice 31734 Cash Payment Invoice 31734 Transaction Date Refer 41304 CLIFFORD, SUSAN E 101-43100-328 Employment Advertising 03-20~04/03-27-04 P/W AD 3/27/2004 E 601-49400-328 Employment Advertising 03-20-04/03-27-04 P/W AD 3/27/2004 E 602-49450-328 Employment Advertising 03-20-04/03-27-04 P/W AD 3/27/2004 3/31/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 $53.85 $53.85 $53.86 REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Cash Payment Invoice 719087 Cash Payment Invoice 719087 Cash Payment Transaction Date 3~25~2004 , Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250 00 Refer 4i~04 ~'i~_~TS~Tio~S~L~ · E 101-43100-305 Medical Services DRUG SCREENING $38.00 E 101-43100-305 Medical Services DRUG SCREENING DRUG SCREENING $38.00 E I01-45200-305 Medical Services ~lnvoice 719087 $38.00 ~"~'"~ i'ransaction Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $114 00 Refer 4i~04 C5cA Co~ ~TLi~G~MiDWES~ ' -862- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 7 Payments Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $339.80 Invoice 83434132 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $316.60 Invoice 83444164 4/112004 Transaction Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $656.40 Refer 41304 COLLISION SPECIALTIES Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair 1992 CROWN VIC REPAIR/PAINT $880.00 invoice 032204 3/22/2003 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $880.00 Refer 41304 COMPUTER CHEQUE Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 02-04 CHECK VERIFICATION $54.50 Invoice 10685010204 3/1/2004 10100 Total $54.50 Refer 41304 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORIN Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts MISCELLANEOUS PARTS $32.78 Invoice 45020 3/24/2004 PO 18256 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts MISCELLANEOUS PARTS $32.78 invoice 45020 3/24/2004 PO 18256 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply BLADES, ETC $592.82 Invoice 45019 3/24/2004 PO 18263 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 RepaidMaint Supply MISCELLANEOUS PARTS $382.87 Invoice 45018 3/24/2004 PO 18262 10100 Total $1,041.25 . Refer 41304 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN _ Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs 03-19-04 LEGAL ADS $129.88 Invoice 2545329 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs 03-26-05 LEGAL ADS $129.88 Invoice 2549422 3/2912004 10100 Total $259.76 Refer 41304 COOPER, BRYON Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 REFUND DOCK FEE Wells Fargo 10100 $250.00 Total $250.00 Refer 41305 COVERALL CLEANING CONCEPTS Cash Payment Invoice 84386 Cash Payment Invoice 84386 Cash Payment Invoice 84386 Cash Payment Invoice 84386 Cash Payment Invoice 84386 Cash Payment Invoice 84386 E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 4/1/2004 E 222-42260-460 Janitorial Services 4/1/2004 E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services 4/1/2004 E 101-43100-460 Janitorial Services 4/1/2004 E 601-49400-460 Janitorial Services 4/1/2004 E 602-49450-460 Janitorial Services 4/1/2004 04-04 CLEANING SERVICE 04-04 CLEANING SERVICE 04-04 CLEANING SERVICE 04-04 CLEANING SERVICE 04-04 CLEANING SERVICE 04-04 CLEANING SERVICE $1,166.18 $756,58 $5O4.38 $46.15 $46.15 $46.14 -863- ......... ~ ............ £~_. CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 8 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 04-04 CLEANING SERVICE $199.16 Invoice 84386 4/I/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $2 764 74 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $15.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $265.00 Refer 41304 DAWES WATER EQUIPMENT Cash Payment E 60%49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply METERS $1,189.72 Invoice 3217038 3/23/2004 PO 18264 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply METERS $192.47 Invoice 3216048 3/9/2004 PO 18256 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply CREDIT--METERS -$426.43 Invoice UC20403 2/16/2004 Transaction Date 3/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $955.76 Refer 41304 DAVIS, TOM Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 OTnvoice 041304 4/13/2004 ransaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY CREDIT-LIQUOR E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MiX 4/6/2004 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 4/8/2004 -$1,362.60 $1o0.o0 $9.00 $682.65 $1,092.85 $87.40 $941.20 $90.00 $2.55 $2.35 $1,101.55 $50.70 $150.00 Cash Payment Invoice 51451 Cash Payment Invoice 256519 Cash Payment invoice 257492 Cash Payment Invoice 257483 Cash Payment Invoice 258396 Cash Payment Invoice 258969 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 247516-B 12/31/2003 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 251451-B 2/3/2004 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 2/13/2004 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale BEER 3/16/2004 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 3/23/2004 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 3/23/2004 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 3/30/2O04 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 4/2/2004 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 253091-B 2/17/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 257482-B 3/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale BEER Invoice 259450 4/6/2004 ~¢,,~Cash Payment ,,?nvoice 259461 Cash Payment Invoice 259942 -864- CiTY OF MOUND Transaction Date 3/23/2004 City of Mound 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 9 Payments Current Period: April 2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,947.65 Refer 41304 DEL PLACEMENT AGENCY, INCOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 12-27-03 WINE POURING $100.00 Invoice 3013 3/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 02-07-04WINE POURING $100.00 Invoice 3012 3/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 02-21-04 WINE POURING $100.00 Invoice 3011 3/14/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.00 Refer 41304 DENISON, TOM Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $15.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $265.00 Refer 41304 DIKA, EMIL Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $261.25 Refer 41304 DILLON, ELIZABETH Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $15.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $265.00 Refer 41304 DIRLAM, LARRYAND JAN _ Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $261.25 Refer 41304 DRAHOS, MARK Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 E-Z RECYCLING Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic 04-04 CURBSIDE RECYCLING $8,326.48 Invoice 6445 4/6/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,326.48 Refer 41304 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,194.70 Invoice 221983 3/15/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $330.00 Invoice 43206 3/25/2004 -865- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 10 Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,732.20 Invoice 222074 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $241.50 Invoice 222055 3/19/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,395.70 Invoice 222161 3/29/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,807.70 Invoice 222259 4/5/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $117.00 Invoice 518222 4/8/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,818.80 Refer 41304 ELLIOTT, TOM Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 EMERGENCYAPPARATUSMA/NT Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair #24 PUMP SHIFT REPAIR $989.34 Invoice 17672 3/23/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair DRAIN PANEL $234.05 Invoice 17601 3/16/2004 PO 18063 Oransaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,223.39 Refer 41304 EMERY, DAVID Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 EMERY, RICK Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $250.00 Cash Payment E 401-46540-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA THRU 03-31-04 REQUEST #4 $73,615.75 Invoice 041304 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 4/7/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $73,615.75 Refer 4i304 EQ~jiPMEN~SU~PLy' iNCORpo~ Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies REPAIRED WIRING DEPOT $112.50 Invoice 1779 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings SERVICE MAINTENANCE $980.00 Invoice S258/31904 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings UNIT HEATER FOR GARAGE $559.30 Invoice 1776 Transaction Date 3/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 651 80 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 nvoice 041304 4/13/2004 ~,--~Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 EVANS, CLAYTON ' -866- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment invoice 041304 City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 11 Current Period: April 2004 R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 4/13/2004 Refer 41304 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $32.00 Invoice 188670 3/18/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32.00 Refer 41304 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE Cash Payment E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions TWO YEAR SUBSCRIPTION $52.00 invoice 4328694-R1 2/11/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $52.00 Refer 41304 FRAZIER, DEAN AND LINDA Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 FRESKE, NORMAN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 FRIGARD, CHARLES Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 FRIGARD, KARLA Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA _ Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells 02-04 472-0600 $1,909.46 invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 03-04 472-0635 $347.71 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 03-04 472-0635 $347.71 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 03-04 472-0635 $347.70 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells 03-04 472-0648 $656.66 invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,609.24 Refer 41304 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE AND RESC Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA CABLES $489.25 invoice 9016 4/5/2004 PO 18076 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $489.25 Refer 41304 FROVARP, ROBERT -867- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09104 9:53 AM Page 12 Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $261.25 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials Invoice 6851857-B Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 6865057 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 6865057 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 6865057 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials Invoice 6865057 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials Invoice 6865057 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials Invoice 6865057 O Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies nvoice 6812081 Cash Payment Invoice 6865058 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services Invoice 6865059 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services Invoice 6865056 Cash Payment E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services Invoice 6878234 Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies Invoice 6865046 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 68717602 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 68717602 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 68717602 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials Invoice 68717602 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials Invoice 68717602 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials Invoice 68717602 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 03-30-04 MATS Invoice 6878245 ~'~;ash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 03-30-04 MATS Invoice 6878246 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 03-30-04 MATS Invoice 6878243 BALANCE DUE 03-16-04 UNIFORMS 03-16-04 UNIFORMS 03-16-04 UNIFORMS 03-16-04 MATS 03-16-04 MATS 03-16-04 MATS 01-20-04 MATS E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 03-16-04 MATS 03-16-04 MATS 03-16-04 MATS 03-30-04 MATS 03-16-04 MATS . 03-23-04 UNIFORMS 03-23-04 UNIFORMS 03-23-04 UNIFORMS 03-23-04 MATS 03-23-04 MATS 03-23-04 MATS $2.00 $19.56 $19.56 $19.56 $64.86 $64.86 $64.85 $91.49 $117.94 $75.O3 $53.74 $52.49 $107.22 $26.92 $26.92 $26.91 $30.43 $30.43 $30.43 $5O.85 $5o,85 $41.82 -868- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 13 Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 03-30-04 MATS $91.49 Invoice 6878233 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 03-30-04 UNIFORMS $39.52 invoice 6878244 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 03-30-04 UNIFORMS $39.52 invoice 6878244 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 03-30-04 UNIFORMS $39.52 Invoice 6878244 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 03-30-04 MATS $17.43 Invoice 6878244 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 03-30-04 MATS $17.43 Invoice 6878244 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 03-30-04 MATS $17.43 Invoice 6878244 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 03-09-04 UNIFORMS $39.32 invoice 6858475 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 03-09-04 UNIFORMS $39.32 Invoice 6858475 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 03-09-04 UNIFORMS $39.32 Invoice 6858475 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 03-09-04 MATS $14.44 Invoice 6858475 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 03-09-04 MATS $14.44 invoice 6858475 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 03-09-04 MATS $14.44 Invoice 6858475 Refer 41304 GALLS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 5700854401015 3/30/2004 PO 18077 EQUIPMENT PACKAGE $463.24 Refer 41304 GAUDETTE, THOMAS Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ~0.00 Refer 41304 GEYEN, SUE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ..... ?~61.25 Refer 41304 GILGENBACH, RYAN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ~0.00 Refer 41304 GILLET, MARC Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 -869- City of Mound 04/09/04 9:53 AM ×,/" ~ ~',,,,,,~ Page 14 / Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $15.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $265.00 Refer 41304 GJERSTAD, CLARENCE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 03-31-04 WATER $4.47 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 03-31-04 WATER $4.47 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 03-31-04 WATER $4.48 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies 03-31-04 WATER #5158500 $41.96 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 03-31-04WATER $13.42 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $68.80 ~ Refer 4 i304 Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs -2004 STREET IMPROVEMENT~ Invoice 041304 311812004 $4,432.00 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4 432.00 Refer 41304 GODDAR~, ~ER'E~ Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 GOLFIS, JEFF Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $250.00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $662.50 Invoice 00013450 3/20/2004 Transaction Date 3/31/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $662.50 R~fer 41304 GRAPEB~iN~iN~S Cash Payment E 609~9750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $576.00 Invoice 62717 3/22/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $576.00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6.845.88 Invoice 864883 3/24/2004 ~¢,,,,hCash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $595.53 ~,..~ ?voice 864940 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $234.97 Invoice 865045 3/24/2004 -870- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 15 Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT--LIQUOR -$9.00 Invoice 635346 3/16/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $132.24 Invoice 861888 3/17/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $492.66 Invoice 862021 3/17/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,968.04 Invoice 862022 3/17/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $0.00 Invoice 867809 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $277.25 Invoice 868016 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,238.19 Invoice 868238 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,508.50 Invoice 868434 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$67.16 Invoice 635722 3~22~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$8.85 Invoice 636125 3~25~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$66.15 Invoice 635926 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$35.38 Invoice 636126 3/25/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT--LIQUOR -$61.95 Invoice 636717 4/6/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15,044.75 Refer 41304 GRUMAN, GREG Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100' Total $250.00 Refer 41304 HALL, TED Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 HANSON, KANDIS Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK APPLICATION $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD APPLICATION $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 HARVELL, JAMES Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 HARVEY, ROGER Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 -871 - CiTY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: April 2004 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 16 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 HAWK LABELING SYSTEMS Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies CARTRIDGES Invoice 137046 3/16/2004 PO 18074 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies CARTRIDGES Invoice 137125 3/18/2004 PO 18075 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo Refer 41304 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals 6 CONTAINERS Invoice DM100439 2/29/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-229 Street Repairs 6 CONTAINERS Invoice DM101506 3/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals HYDROFLUOSILIClC ACID Invoice 600724 3/19/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 422 22 Refer 41304 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery HOSE WITH ENDS $86.27 Invoice 50377 3/5/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery ~ WING $112.77 ~"'~ Invoice 50379 3/5/2004 ~.~,Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials PIPE/SHOP SERVICE $37.96 Invoice 50463 3/19/2004 Transaction Date 4/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $237.00 Refer 41304 HEMSTOCK, CHAD Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Cash Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals 02-04 RADIO LEASE $1,002.96 Invoice 24028022 2/29/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-418 Other Rentals 03-04 RADIO LEASE $1,323.44 Invoice 24038024 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals 03-04 RADIO LEASE $1,002.96 Invoice 24038023 3/31/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tote $3,329 36 Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 02-04 ROOM AND BOARD $4,378.75 Invoice 000397 3/21/2004 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,378.75 Refer 41304 HENNEPiN coUNTy TREASURER( Cash Payment Invoice 041304 ash Payment Invoice 041304 E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 4/13~2000 E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 4/13/2004 #13-117-27-33-0016 1ST HALF PROPERTY TAX $86.75 $24.90 10100 Total $111.65 $3O.OO $3O.OO $1,362.22 #13-117-24-33-0017 1ST HALF PROPERTY TAX $213.21 $137.60 Transaction Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $350.81 -872- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 17 Current Period: April 2004 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 101-22979 1599 Bluebird Lane Vacation #04-04 LABELS $292.50 3/9/2004 Refer 41304 Cash Payment Invoice 2004-30 Transaction Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $292.50 Refer 41304 HENRY, OWEN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 HERDEN, STEPHEN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 HERRICK, NANCY Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $225.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $225.00 Refer 41304 HEY~VOOD, DONALD Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $451.95 Invoice 328197 4/5/2004 Transaction Date 4/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $451.95 Refer 41304 HOLDEN, PAUL Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 HUNT, RICHARD Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3~25~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 HUSBY, JESSE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 IKON OFFICE MACHINES Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair DRUM UNIT $223.38 Invoice 2363298A 3~8~2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-202 Duplicating and copying CREDIT-METER ENTRY -$18.95 Invoice 23965738-B 2/12/2004 -873- City of Mound 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 18 Payments CiTY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 601-49400-202 Duplicating and copying CREDIT--METER ENTRY -$18.95 Invoice 23965738-B 2/12/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-202 Duplicating and copying -$18.96 Invoice 23965738-B 2/12/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-202 Duplicating and copying $137.69 Invoice 23178886 3/24/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $304.21 Refer 41304 INFRATECH Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply Invoice 0400340 3/19/2004 PO 18260 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 RepaidMaint Supply Invoice 0400357 2/1/2004 PO 18044 Transaction Date 3/29/2004 CREDIT--METER ENTRY 03-24-04 THRU 04-24-04 MAINTENANCE GREEN/BLUE PAINT $74.04 MONITOR $1,204.50 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,278.54 Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying 04-09-04 THRU 07-08-04 MAINTENANCE $94.76 Invoice 61827053 3/19/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $94.76 Refer 41304 ISLAND PARK SKELLY Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 2001 CHEV IMPALA $276.19 ~r,~l nvoice 15646 3/4/2004 ~,,,l)Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 95 ELGIN $74.86 Invoice 15668 3/9/2004 Cash Payment E 101.43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 98 CHEV CAB/CHASSIS $92.95 Invoice 15754 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 90 CHEV PICKUP $92.95 Invoice 15757 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 99 CHEV PICKUP $92.95 Invoice 15760 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101.43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 02 CHEV SILVERADO $30.67 Invoice 15762 3/23/2004 Cash Payment E 101.43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 95 F800 $42,41 Invoice 15781 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 03 DODGE OIL CHANGE $25.86 Invoice 15457 2/4/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 00 CHEV IMPALA $66,00 Invoice 15520 2/12/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 04 CROWN VIC $55.00 Invoice 15561 2/19/2004 Cash Payment E 101.42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 98 DURANGO OIL CHANGE $25.86 Invoice 15598 2/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #844 FLUSH TRANSMISSION $210.53 Invoice 15682 3/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #847 OIL CHANGE $30.01 Invoice 15684 3/11/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #840 OIL CHANGE $25.86 l nvoice 15716 3/16/2004 ~,,,.-Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #842 BATTERY $149.21 Invoice 15722 3/16/2004 -874- ./ ....... ~ ...... CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 15752 Cash Payment Invoice 15753 Cash Payment Invoice 15837 City of Mound Payments E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #843 TIRE REPAIR 3/22/20O4 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #841 BATTERY 3/22/2004 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #846 OIL CHANGE 3/31/2004 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 19 Current Period: April 2004 $15.00 $121.21 $25.86 Transaction Date 4/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,453.38 Refer 41304 JERECZEK, JASON Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/1312004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 42404 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVIC Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair ENGINE #24 REPAIRS $1,001.40 Invoice 0000763 10/30/2003 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair ENGINE #24 REPAIRS $2,706.06 Invoice 000762 10/30/2003 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,707.46 Refer 41304 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $131.70 Invoice 1698965 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $465.95 Invoice 1698966 3~24~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $0.00 Invoice 1698967 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,591.63 Invoice 1698968 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,400.57 Invoice 1698969 3~24~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,124.94 Invoice 1695996 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $244.68 Invoice 1695997 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $723.75 Invoice 1695998 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $118.53 Invoice 1695999 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $634.80 Invoice 1702408 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $537.45 Invoice 1702409 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $29.99 Invoice 1702410 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,036.59 Invoice 1702411 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$9.52 Invoice 247699 3/30/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$4.83 Invoice 247409 3/26/2004 -875- J ~,, ,, II1 , CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 247410 Cash Payment Invoice 247411 City of Mound Payments 04/09~04 9:53 AM Page 20 Current Period: April 2004 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$6~92 3/26/2O04 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT--WINE -$4.83 3/26/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,014.48 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 411312004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $15.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $265,00 Refer 41304 JOHNSON, JENNIFER AND TIM Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/2612004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Reier 4i~04 joHNSO~i Mi~HA~ Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total i~efer 41304 JUBILEE FOODS ~Cash Payment E 1~10~430 ~1~ - ' - s 03-09-04 COUNCIL COOKIES $10.76 Invoice 10020 3/9/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 03-16-04 COUNCIL COOKIES $18.90 Invoice 10020 3/16/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $29.66 Refer 41304 JUVENILE OFFICERS~SSO~ Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2004 MEMBERSHIP DUES $15.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 PO 18171 Transaction Date 4/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 Ref;~ ~304 KANE, THOMAS Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 invoice 041304 3/14/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $250.00 Cash Paymen[ G 101-22805 Police FoEeiture Program CENTER COUNSOLE Invoice 21847-01 3/2/2004 PO 18131 Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~ E~ERIOR SINGLE DECWGRILL Invoice 21998 3/5/2004 PO 18144 Cash Payment G 101-20200 Accounts Payable Invoice 15776-02 2/13/2004 PO 17832 Cash Payment G 101-22805 Police Forfeiture Program Invoice 21847-02 3/18/2004 PO 18131 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 41304 KELLER, WADE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 POWER SUPP SOUNDOFF POWER SUPP.SOUNDOFF Wells Fargo 10100 REFUND DOCK FEE $334.40 $469.90 $761.86 $1,008,85 Total $2,575.01 $250.00 -876- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 3/26/2004 City of Mound 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 21 Payments Current Period: April 2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION, IN Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-31-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $7,172.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,172.00 Refer 41304 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 H.R.A. MEETING $379.50 Invoice 60742-A 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 REDEV PROJECT AREA #1 $1,090.80 Invoice 60742-B 3/22/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 02-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $3,832.62 Invoice 60742-C 3/22/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22974 Bloomquist Hotel Developme 02-04 BLOOMQUIST HOTEL DEVELOPMENT $374.00 Invoice 60742-D 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 455-46383-300 Professional Srvs $1,015.79 Invoice 60742-E 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs $2,346.52 invoice 60745-A 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs $96.00 Invoice 60745-B 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs $192.00 Invoice 60745-C 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs $60.00 Invoice 60745-D 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-300 Professional Srvs $30.00 Invoice 60745-E 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs $918.00 invoice 60745-F 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs $858.00 Invoice 60745-G 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 496~46580-300 Professional Srvs $211.80 Invoice 60745-H 3/22/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22979 1599 Bluebird Lane Vacation 02-04 1599 BLUEBIRD LANE $126.00 Invoice 60745-11 3/22/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22978 4520 Denbigh #04-03 OIson, 02-04 4520 DENBIGH ROAD $60.00 Invoice 60745-12 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-316 Legal P & I 02-04 MISC P/I $132.60 Invoice 60745-13 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 1736 SHOREWOOD LAND $48.00 invoice 60745-J1 3/2212004 Cash Payment E 401-43105-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION $426.00 Invoice 60745-J2 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 2004 STREET RECONSTRUCTION $246.00 Invoice 60745-J3 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 401-43110-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE $290.00 Invoice 60742 Transaction Date 3/31/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,733.63 Refer 41304 KIMLINGER, SCOTT 02-04 CUSTER PURCHASE AGREEMENT 02-04 CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT 02-04 DREAMWOOD LAWSUIT 02-04 EXCEL LINE RELOCATION 02-04 SKAALERUD LOT SURVEY 02-04 BOLT VS LIQUOR STORE 02-04 EXEUCTIVE 02-04 ADMINISTRATIVE 02-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING -877- CITY' OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: April 2004 04~09~04 9:53 AM Page 22 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 $250.00 $7.5O Total $257.50 $250.00 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 KREUZIGER, JEFF Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 KURTZ, JAMES Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training REPLACE #14112 $129.80 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $129.80 Refer 41304 LAKER NEwsPApER ~ , Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 02-07-04 ANNUAL MEETING $19.90 invoice 905 2/7/2004 ~,~.,,l~Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 41304 LAKER/PIONEER NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 03-13-04 WINE TASTING $286.50 Invoice OOX21 3/13/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 02-21-04 WINE TASTING $286.50 Invoice OOX20 2/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 02-14-04 WINE TASTING $331.50 Invoice OOX19 2/14/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 03-13-04 DISPLAY AD $286.50 Invoice XXXXXX 3/13/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 03-31-04 DISPLAY AD $155.22 Invoice XXXXX 3/1/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 02-04 DISPLAYAD $309.00 Invoice XXXXX 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-351 Legal Notices Publishing 02-28-04 STATEMENT $155.22 Invoice 932 2/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 02-04 DISPLAY AD $153.78 Invoice XXXXX 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 964 22 Cash Payment E 601-49400-328 Employment Advertising THRU 03-24-04 CLASSIFIED $207.00 Invoice 28500 3/24/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 REFUND DOCKFEE $250.00 -878- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 3/25/2004 City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 23 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 LANGFIELD, JENNIFER Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 LARSON, KARA Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 LARSON, MARY JO Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $261.25 Refer 41304 LARUE, BRENTAND CORRINE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13~2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $108.84 Invoice 1844838 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES $11.49 Invoice 1858042 3/23/2004 PO 18259 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES $11.49 Invoice 1858042 3/23/2004 PO 18259 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES $11.48 Invoice 1858042 3/23/2004 PO 18259 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $96.68 Invoice 1844832 3/18/2004 PO 18259 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $96.68 Invoice 1844832 3/18/2004 PO 18259 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $96.68 Invoice 1844832 3/18/2004 PO 18259 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $43.64 Invoice 1735398 2/13/2004 PO 18231 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $43.64 invoice 1735398 2/13/2004 PO 18231 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS $43.63 Invoice 1735398 2/13/2004 PO 18231 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $564.25 Refer 41304 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T -879- ...... City of Mound 04/09/04 9:53 AM -~.~'"'""'~" -'~'"'~ Page 24 -'-/'' ~ 'x~ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 101-41110-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $51.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41310-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $15.96 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $20.53 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-36t General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $3.78 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $111.73 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42115-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $1.69 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $19,56 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $123.65 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $8.28 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $27.90 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 222.42260-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $149.60 t~nvoice 041304 4/13/2004 "~-~'~Cash Payment E 609.49750-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $159.83 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $116.75 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 602.49450-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $116.75 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 281-45210-361 General Liability Ins GEN LIABILITY INS $16.49 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3~26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $944.00 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies DIRECTORIES OF MN CITIES HANSON $46.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-210 Operating Supplies DIRECTORIES OF MN CITIES BUSINARO $46.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies DIRECTORIES OF MN CITIES MOORE $30.67 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies DIRECTORIES OF MN CITIES MOORE $7.66 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies DIRECTORIES OF MN CITIES MOORE $7.67 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies DIRECTORIES OF MN CITIES RITTER $46.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-210 Operating Supplies DIRECTORIES OF MN CITIES SMITH $46.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 r~ash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies DIRECTORIES OF MN CITIES KURTZ $46.00 ~,,,-- Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies DIRECTORIES OF MN CITIES PEDERSON $46.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 -880- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 4/13/2004 E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 4/13/2004 E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 4/13/2004 City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 25 Current Period: April 2004 DIRECTORIES OF MN CITIES SKINNER $15.33 DIRECTORIES OF MN CITIES SKINNER $15.33 DIRECTORIES OF MN CITIES SKINNER $15.34 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $368.00 Refer 41304 LEGEROS, JOHN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 LINDA'S PHOTOGRAPHY Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous PHOTOGRAPHS $37.28 Invoice 26496 2/24/2004 Transaction Date 3~26~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $37.28 Refer 41304 LUBE TECH, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply RETURNABLE STEEL DRUM $91.82 Invoice 1047090 2/10/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply RETURNABLE STEEL DRUM $91.82 invoice 1047090 2/10/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply RETURNABLE STEEL DRUM $91.81 Invoice 1047090 2/10/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $275.45 Refer 41304 LUCAS, KEVlN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/1312004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 LUNDEEN, RICHARD Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $100.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transact on Date 3~25~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $107.50 Refer 41304 MADDEN, STEVE _ Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $261.25 Refer 41304 MAINSTREAM SOLUTIONS Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous 04-04 SPAM VIRUS FILTER $17.97 Invoice 1140-12840 4~4~2004 -881 - CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: April 2004 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 26 Cash Payment E 101-42110-205 Computer Software 04-04 SPAM VIRUS FILTER $11.98 invoice 1140-12840 4/4/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $29.95 Reier 41304 MAR~ ~ii DiSTRiBUT-~R Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,729.75 Invoice 647560 3/2312004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $37.95 Invoice 647561 3/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $23.00 Invoice 647562 3/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,849.40 Invoice 652866 4/5/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $18.40 Invoice 652867 4/5/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $37.30 Invoice 650006 3/30/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,725.80 Invoice 650005 3/30/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,421.60 ~Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight - 03-01-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $5 40 ~.~' Invoice 13531 3/1/2004 ' Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 03-04-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $98.10 Invoice 13550 3/4/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 03-08-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $10.80 Invoice 13560 3/8/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 03-11-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $66.60 Invoice 13580 3/11/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 03-15-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $9.00 Invoice 13592 3/15/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 03-18-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $121.50 Invoice 13611 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 609.49750-265 Freight 03-22-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $9.00 Invoice 13618 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 03-25-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $201.60 Invoice 13640 3/25/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 03-29-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $49.50 Invoice 13651 3/29/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $571.50 Refe; ~i304 MArTINi STEVE~ Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $225.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Cash Payment R 101-32210 Building Permits Invoice 16729 4/13/2004 REFUND PERMIT FEE $234.60 -882- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 4/1/2004 City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 27 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $234.60 Refer 41304 MATHER, COLIN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 MCCAUL, JIM Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 MCNAMARA, T. Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 METRO FIRE OFFICERS ASSOC M Cash Payment E 222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2004 MEMBERSHIP DUES $100.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.00 Refer 41304 METRO MUNICIPALITIES, ASSOCI Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2004 MEMBERSHIP DUES $3,233.00 Invoice 041304 1/30/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,233.00 Refer 41304 METRO SYSTEMS Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LATERAL FILES $1,892.37 Invoice 33596 2/27/2004 Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA FURNITURE $66,178.40 Invoice 32603 12/8/2003 PO 17959 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $68,070.77 Refer 41404 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR Cash Payment G 602-21825 SAC Deposits 03-04 SAC CHARGES $1,350.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste DisposaI-MCIS 05-04 WASTEWATER $31,172.87 Invoice 772578 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 4/7/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32,522.87 Refer 41304 MICHAEL, GEOFF Cash Payment E 101-42110-205 Computer Software FLOPPY DRIVE WITH SOFTWARE $308.83 Invoice 650 3/27/2004 PO 18343 Transaction Date 4/7/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $308.83 Refer 41304 MIDWEST ELECTROSTATIC REF/N Cash Payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA PAINT FILE CABINETS $818.00 Invoice 041304 Transaction Date 4/7/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $818.00 -883- _J_____ ......... ~ ........ _~__ CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 28 Current Period: April 2004 Refer 41304 MINNEAPOLIS WINDOW SHADE C Cash Payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~RA WINDOW COVERINGS $285.00 invoice 53605 3/17/2004 PO 18193 Transaction Date 4/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $285.00 Refer 41304 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA Cash Payment E 609.49750-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 03-01-04 WINDOW WASH $37.28 Invoice 314001813 3/14/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $37.28 Refer 41304 MINNESOTA BOARD PEACE OFFI Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2004 LICENSE BECK, KENNETH $90.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 PO 18161 Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2004 LICENSE BURKE $90.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 PO 18161 Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2004 LICENSE SWANSON $90.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 PO 18161 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $270.00 Refer 41304 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETYA Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training LAW ENFORCEMENT CLASS MURRAH $281.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training LAW ENFORCEMENT CLASS SCHOENHERR $281.00 ~i,,,~; Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $562.00 R~;r ~i~(~4 biNN~A ~OL~Tio~ C°N~-R~ Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 12-31-03 THRU 03-23-04 KOEHLER'S $120.00 ADDITION Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.00 Refer 4;304 Mi~iN~S~-~ VA'i. LE; TESTinG l_~ Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals COLIFORM, MF - WATER $72.50 Invoice 204494 3/16/2004 Transaction Date 4/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.50 Cash Payment E 101-41500-433 Dues and Subscriptions NOTARY COMMISSIONS $120.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/7/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120,00 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $257,50 cl Oash Payment E 895-49990-124 Fire Pens Contrib 04-04 FIRE RELIEF MONTHLY $9,641.67 .;nvoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $9,641.67 -884- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 29 Current Period: April 2004 E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-31-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $541.00 4/13/2004 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $541.00 Refer 41304 MUZAK- MINNEAPOLIS Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 04-04 MUSIC SERVICE $92.90 Invoice A425671 3/31/2004 Transaction Date 3~26~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $92.90 Refer 41304 NATIONAL WATERWORKS Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply SLEAVES,GATE VALVE RISER $399.02 Invoice 1160757 3~30~2004 PO 18284 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts TAPT CLAMP $493.68 invoice 1042331 2/13/2004 PO 18268 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts PENTAGON KEY $83.07 Invoice 1032366 2/12/2004 PO 18223 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $975.77 Refer 41304 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $428.50 Invoice 25165 3/22/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $428.50 Refer 41304 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (FIRE Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-04 THRU 03-18-04 CELL PHONES $78.46 Invoice 041304 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $78.46 Refer 41321 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (PAR Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells $37.34 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells $15.87 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells $87.73 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells $34.97 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells $75.35 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells $71.55 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells $32.82 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $355.63 Refer 41305 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 02-19-04 THRU 03-18-04 CELL PHONES $389.17 invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/31/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $389.17 Refer 41304 NOLDEN, CYNTHIA Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 02-19-04 THRU 03-18-04 BERENT, BRIAN 02-19-04 THRU 03-18-04 TAFFE,JOHN 02-19-04 THRU 03-18-04 FACKLER,JIM 02-19-04 THRU 03-18-04 HOFF,KATIE 02-19-04 THRU 03-18-04 SWARTZER,BRIAN 02-19-04 THRU 03-18-04 SIMONEAU,MATT 02-19-04 THRU 03-18-04 NORLANDER,JILL -885- ~ ~"~'~ CiTY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04~09~04 9:53 AM Page 30 Current Period: April 2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 NORLANDER, JILL Cash Payment E 101-42400-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~RA USB CABLE $31.94 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $31.94 ~ NORTHWEST HALT, iNcO~p Refer 4130 A~P 0 Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-31-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $5,230.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,230.00 Refer 41304 OLSEN MELODY Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 OLSON, DAVE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 OLSON, DEBORAH Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits -- REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 ~,,,,,,~4nvoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $250.00 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE ~O~PA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $68.00 Invoice 8030233 3/9/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,275.72 Invoice 8031146 3/22/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $536.30 Invoice 8031777 3/29/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $147.50 Invoice 8032084 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $474.47 Invoice 8032412 4/5/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2 501 99 Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250 00 Refer 4i304 pEDERSO~, GREG ~ash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $139.79 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $477,70 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 -886- CiTY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 City of Mound 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 31 Payments Current Period: April 2004 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies PHOTOGRAPHS $194.21 4/13/2004 E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies FRAMES $41.07 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $852.77 Refer 41304 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $122.60 Invoice 58671523 3/17/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $79.60 Invoice 58671592 3/31/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $202,20 Refer 41304 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $256.55 Invoice 2053271 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1.491.45 Invoice 2053272 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $50.00 Invoice 2053273 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $43.95 Invoice 2053274 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $345.90 Invoice 2051098 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $986.75 invoice 2051099 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $754.40 Invoice 2055700 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,012.10 Invoice 2055701 3/31/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,941.10 Refer 41304 PHYLE, SCOTT Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $504.74 Invoice 37312 3/16/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $472.78 Invoice 38037 3/29/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $977.52 Refer 42404 PROK, CHRIS Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $281.25 Refer 41304 PROLAWNS ON THE LAKE -887- ~.~. ........ City of Mound 04/09/04 9:53 AM ×/'~' " Page 32 / Payments CiTY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 6160 Cash Payment Invoice 6160 Cash Payment Invoice 6160 Cash Payment Invoice 6160 E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract WEED FERTILIZER $100.00 3/15/2004 PO 18198 E 101-45250-400 Repairs & Maint Contract WEED FERTILIZER $936.00 3/15/2004 PO 18198 E 101-45200-400 Repairs & Maint Contract WEED FERTILIZER $4,890.50 3/15/2004 PO 18198 E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract WEED FERTILIZER $108.00 3/15/2004 PO 18198 Transaction Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,034.50 Refer 41~0~ QOA~iT~w/~E~N~iR/Ts Cash Payment E 609-49750-351 Legal Notices Publishing LIQUOR $1,841.62 Invoice 384361-00 3/24/2004 Cash Payrnent E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,575.04 Invoice 384641-00 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $61.50 Invoice 384544-00 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $609.79 Invoice 381653-00 3/17/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $22,57 Invoice 381654-00 3/17/2004 OCash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 382262-00 3/17/2004 $1,519.88 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $873.38 Invoice 387341-00 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $567.62 Invoice 387161-00 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $75.94 Invoice 387162-00 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$199.90 Invoice 385068-00 3/25/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $6,947 44 ~efe; 4i304 Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machine~ REPAIR 2000 FORD F-350 TRUCK $811.93 Invoice 8119 3/19/2004 Transaction Date 3/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $811.93 Cash Payment E 101~5200-223 Building Repair Supplies ADD RECP,ETC $250.40 Invoice 040604 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 03-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $114.54 Invoice 1544 3/18/2004 Transaction Date 4/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $114 54 R;fe~ ~i304 R~LI~ A~Sso~iATi~)~ Mi~N~ -¥ash Payment E 670-49500-208 Instructional Supplies 2004 MEMBERSHIP DUES $20.00 ~i~....~ Invoice 041304 3/15/2004 PO 17506 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total -888- C~TY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 33 Current Period: April 2004 RED WING FIRE DEPARTMENT E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training MN STATE FIRE DEPT ASSOC CONFERENCE $1,110.00 4/13/2004 Refer 41304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Transaction Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,110.00 Refer 41304 -REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies 02-04 AIR AND OXYGEN $21.34 Invoice R02041021 2/29/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies 03-04 AIR AND OXYGEN $22.43 Invoice R03041032 3/31/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $43.77 Refer 41304 RICE, NICOLE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 RIDGEVIEW MEDICAL, MOUND Cash Payment E 101-41500-305 Medical Services PRE-EMPLOY EXAM BERENT $96.00 invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $96.00 Refer 41304 RODRIGUEZ, JEFF Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3~26~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 RUDE, MONTE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $261.25 Refer 41304 RUOHO, JOHN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 SBC MINNCOMM PAGING Cash Payment E 101-43100-418 Other Rentals PAGER 612-530-4720 $23.41 Invoice 67200004041 . 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-418 Other Rentals PAGER 612-530-4720 $23.41 Invoice 67200004041 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-418 Other Rentals PAGER 612-530-4720 $23.42 Invoice 67200004041 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $70.24 Refer 41304 SCHARBER AND SONS Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $7.72 Invoice 2037854 3/25/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair OIL FILTER $132.10 Invoice 2037852 3/25/2004 -889- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 34 Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair HARNESS $21.62 Invoice 2037916 3/30/2004 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $161.44 Refer 41304 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPOR Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-31-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $2,068,00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,068.00 Refer 41304 SCHWAAB, ,NCoR OR TE Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies RUBBER STAMP PAD $42.01 Invoice P95048 312512004 Transaction Date 3/31/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $42.01 Refer 41304 SENTRY SYSTEMS, INCORPORA T Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 04-04 BURGLARY MONITORING $32.86 Invoice 371844 4/1/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 04-04 FIRE MONITORING $36.37 Invoice 369914 4/1/2004 Transaction Date 41512004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $69.23 Refer 41304 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, IN c Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 03-31-04 PUBLICATION $12.50 '!nvoice 807097 4/13~2004 %"'~'Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12.50 Refer 41304 SHAUGHNESSY, MARY Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 SHAW, TODD Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 SHENKENBERG, GEORGE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refe; ; i30 S °REW$ -rREE SE ,icE Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 3601 PRIEST AVE DAMAGED TREE $372.75 Invoice 4396 3/25/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $372.75 Reier 4i30~ ~MiTM jAb~ Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250 00 -890- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 35 R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $225.00 4/13/2004 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $225.00 Refer 41304 SOLMONSON, STEVEN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 413804 SOS PRINTING Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies BUSINESS CARDS $42.33 Invoice 65248 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies BUSINESS CARDS SMTH $42.33 Invoice 65249 3/18/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies LAMINATE DIRECT DIAL LIST $17.25 Invoice 65226 3/10/2004 Transaction Date 3/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $101.91 Refer 41304 SOUTHWEST TRAILS ASSOCIATIO Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow 09-03-04 THRU 02-20-04 SW TRAILS $17,772.41 Invoice 606027662A 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/31/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $17,772.41 Refer 41304 SPECHT, MICHAEL Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $261.25 Refer 41304 SPECIALTY SYSTEMS, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-31-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $5,786,00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,786.00 Refer 41304 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (FIR . Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 03-20-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $181.27 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $181,27 Refer 41304 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (P/W Cash Payment E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels THRU 03-22-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $687.26 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels THRU 03-22-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $424.35 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels THRU 03-22-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $265.21 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,376.82 Refer 41304 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (PAR Cash Payment E 101-45200-212 Motor Fuels THRU 03-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $234.99 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-212 Motor Fuels THRU 03-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $49.03 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 -891 - jC'~Cash Payment tnvoice 041304 Transaction Date City of Mound 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 36 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2004 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ~ $284.02 Refer 41304 SPEEDwAY SUPERAMERiC~ (P~L Cash Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels THRU 03-22-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $1,555,31 Invoice 041304 Transaction Date 3/31/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,555.31 Refer 41304 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUPPL Y Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-31-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $11,130.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,130.00 Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Contract SNOWBLOWER/HARNESS 35,855.37 Invoice VM02254 12/23/2003 PO 18013 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,855.37 Refer 41304 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LIFT RENTAL ETC $1,854.68 Invoice 8221 3/5/2004 Transaction Date 3/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,854.68 ~efer 4i30~ ST6~.TZ ~NYA R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250,00 4/13/2004 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment Invoice 421807.1 Cash Payment Invoice 423801.4 Cash Payment Invoice 427779.1 E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies 2/16/2004 PO 18168 E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies 3/10/2004 PO 18130 E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies 3/16/2004 PO 18130 Cash Payment Invoice 424347.1 Cash Payment Invoice 397854.1 Cash Payment Invoice 308799.1 Cash Payment Invoice 310944.1 Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies Invoice 423801.3 3/8/2004 PO 18130 E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies 3/5/2004 PO 18130 E 101-42115-210 Operating Supplies 4/13/2004 G 101~22803 Police Reserves 4/13/2004 G 101-22803 Police Reserves 4/13/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves Invoice 385439.1 4/13/2004 PO 17844 DUTY AMMO $1.075.65 SIDE FILLER PANELS $35.15 RETURN SIDE FILLERPANEL -$35.15 MIC/PIN CONNECTOR $74.50 SHOTGUN RACK $276.85 SHOTGUNS $1,224.75 CREDIT--TACTICAL LIGHT -$447.25 CREDIT-LEG IRONS -$42.55 TRAFFIC VESTS $698.58 $38.13 $0.00 $359.85 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPLACEMENT BULBS Invoice 430280.1 3/26/2004 PO 18173 Cash Payment E 101-42110-101 F T Empl Regular DUTY AMMO r~nvoice 421807.1 tCash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms JACKET, SCHOENHERR Invoice 407710.1 1/14/2004 -892- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 37 Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms CREDiT--JACKET RETURN -$359.85 Invoice 421351.1 2/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,898.66 Refer 41304 STS CONSULTANTS Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs THRU 03-06-04 MAXWELL INVESTIGATION $1,764.25 invoice 254513 3/19/2004 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs THRU 07-12-03 LOTS 27,28,32 $825.20 Invoice 246320 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs THRU 03-06-05 LOTS 27/28 ETC $3,815.50 Invoice 254652 3/19~2004 Transaction Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,404.95 Refer 41304 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE Cash Payment E 101.45200-409 Other Equipment Repair TIRE2 $86.99 Invoice 10022089 3~22~2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $86.99 Refer 41304 SUN NEWSPAPERS Cash Payment E 101-43100-328 Employment Advertising 03-17-04CLASSIFIED $126.67 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-328 Employment Advertising 03-17-04 CLASSIFIED $126.67 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-328 Employment Advertising 03-17-04 CLASSIFIED $126.66 invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4~2~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $380.00 Refer 41304 SUNBURST CHEMICALS, INC. Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies DISPENSER,HOSE,ETC $678.95 Invoice 0141947-1N 3/10/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $678.95 Refer 41304 SWEEPER SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REPAIRS ELGIN PELICAN STREET $25.55 SWEEPER Invoice 5481 3/23/2004 Transaction Date 3/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $25.55 Refer 41304 THIELMAN, TROY Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $86.15 Invoice 328771 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,459.25 Invoice 328772 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $104.90 Invoice 328105 3/17/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,578.15 Invoice 328106 3/17/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $232.00 Invoice 31602 3/29/2004 -893- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 38 Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $264.00 Invoice 31693 4/5/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,401.75 Invoice 329767 4/5/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,780.05 Invoice 330208 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $80.40 Invoice 330207 4/7/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $36.95 Invoice 329589 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,318.85 Invoice 329590 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $0.00 Invoice 329591 3/31/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 ....... Total $14 342 45 Refer 41304 THURK BROTHERS CHEVROLET Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts #11 SEAT COVER $147.10 Invoice 52339 3/18/2004 PO 18250 Transaction Date 3/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $147.10 Refer 41304 THURNBECK STEEL FABRICATION ~!Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~RA 03-31-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BULLING $1,900.00 ~..~"lnvoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 900 00 Refer 41304 TRAYVAD Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENE~RA CIGARETTE RECEPTACLE $1,118.48 Invoice 28385 11/3/2003 PO 17973 Cash Payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA CIGARETTE RECEPTACLE $279.62 Invoice 28385 11/3/2004 PO 17973 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,398.10 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $4.76 Invoice X07545 2/18/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $45.88 Invoice X07954 2/28/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-220 RepaidMaint Supply 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $78.63 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $5.52 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $117.36 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 RepaidMaint Supply 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $0.64 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $32.94 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 ~,.,,~,,,~ !ash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $21.15 ~nvoice 041304 4/13/2004 ash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $86.33 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 -894- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 041304 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033~04 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 Cash Payment Invoice 033104 City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 39 Current Period: April 2004 E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies 4/13/2004 E 101-41910-200 Office Supplies 4/13/2004 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 4/13/2004 E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts 4/13/2004 E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SNOWBLOWER 4/13/2004 PO 18234 E 222-42260-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SNOWBLOWER 4/13/2004 PO 18234 E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SNOWBLOWER 4/13/2004 PO 18234 E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SNOWBLOWER 4/13/2004 PO 18234 E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SNOWBLOWER 4/13/2004 PO 18234 E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SNOWBLOWER 4/13/2004 PO 18246 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES CREDIT RETURN MERCHANDISE 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 4/13/2004 E 101~45200-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 4/13/2004 E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 4/13/2004 E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 02-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 4/13/2004 E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 3/31/2004 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply 3/31/2004 E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 3/31/2004 E 101-41500-210 Operating Supplies 3/31/2004 E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 3/31/2004 E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies 3/31/2004 E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply 3/31/2004 E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies 3/31/2004 E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 3/31/2004 E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 3/31/2004 E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 3/31/2004 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $28.59 $39,34 -$17.52 $83.14 $135.79 $135.79 $135.79 $45.26 $45.26 $592.65 $24.43 $94.65 $15.00 $6.58 $37.26 $34,15 $48.97 $50.08 $199.44 $18.39 $284.69 $93.52 $9.95 $22.84 $2.13 -895- City of Mound 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 40 Payments CiTY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $7.74 Invoice 033104 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $6.81 Invoice 033104 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $43.30 Invoice 033104 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $22.43 Invoice 033104 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 101.43100-221 Equipment Parts 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $4.46 Invoice 033104 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $55.36 Invoice 033104 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $1.37 Invoice 033104 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $23.34 Invoice X08366 3/31/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 03-04 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $8.43 Invoice X08841 3/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,732.62 Refer 41304 TRUXSTOR CUSTOM TRUCK ACC Cash Payment E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA TOOL BOX ~,,~j, jnvoice 24438 4/5/2004 PO 18199 Cash Payment E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA BED COVER Invoice 24438 4/5/2004 PO 18197 Transaction Date 4/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 41304' TUcKER, THOMAS Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 41304 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR COM~ E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies REPAIR/REPLACE SPRINGS $566.58 $424.94 Total $991.52 $250.00 $7.5O E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-31-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,304.75 Refer 41304 TWiN CiTY OFFicE SUppLy 4~'~Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.05 ,.l~invoice 423313-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $9.05 Invoice 423313-0 Cash Payment $531.75 Invoice 212667 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply PHOTO CELL WASH BAY DOOR $116.67 Invoice 212722 3/4/2004 PO 18245 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply PHOTO CELL WASH BAY DOOR $116.67 Invoice 212722 3/4/2004 PO 18245 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply PHOTO CELL WASH BAY DOOR $116.66 Invoice 212722 3/4/2004 PO 18245 Cash Payment $3,423.00 Invoice 041304 -896- CiTY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 41 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES INK JET CARTRIDGE WRIST PAD DESK ORGANIZER INK JET CARTRIDGE CREDIT-STIR STICKS MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES BINDERS Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423313-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423313-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423313~0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423313-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423313-0 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423313-0 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies invoice 421192-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423321-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423321-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423536-0 Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 422118-0 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423476-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423476-0 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423476-0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423476-0 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423476-0 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423476-0 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423476-0 Cash Payment E 602,-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 423476-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 422859-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SHREDDER Invoice 419118-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA LABELING SYSTEM Invoice 419092-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 421634-0 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 422765-0 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 424044-0 INK JET CARTRIDGE CHAIR CASH TRAY $9.05 $9.05 $9.05 $3.03 $6.03 $6.03 $257.37 $50.53 $17.56 $18.11 -$2.93 $13.31 $13.31 $13.31 $13.31 $13.31 $4,44 $8.88 $8.88 $22.12 $1,379,18 $53.24 $121.80 $353,98 $27.30 -897- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 42 Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies INK JET CARTRIDGE $129.87 Invoice 423449-0 PO 18170 Transaction Date 4/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2 577 22 Cash Payment E 101.42110-210 Operating Supplies 03-08-04 SHIPPING $12.25 Invoice 000035E4F5124 4/13/2004 PO 18344 Transaction Date 4/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12.25 Refei 7130~ V& SJEWE~.~RS Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies ENGRAVE PLAQUE $258.37 Invoice 041304 2/11/2004 Transaction Date 3/23/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $258.37 Refer 41~0~ ~/ALi_E~ PAvI~ ~CO~R~R'ATE"D Cash Payment R 101-32230 Plumbing Connection Permit REFUND DUPLICATE PERMIT $240.00 Invoice 6364 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.00 Refe; 4i~04 VANO~NH~UV~L' Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 cTransaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota ~ $250.00 pRefer 41304 VANDERWIL T HEA THER AND GR Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 41304 VEIT AND COMPANY INCORPORA Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-31-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $26,255.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $26,255.00 Refer 41304 VERIZON WIRELESs (p/W) Cash Payment G 101-22816 Personal Cell Phone JAN.FEB.MAR CELL PHONES $508.01 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells JAN.FEB.MAR CELL PHONES $1,041.87 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells JAN.FEB.MAR CELL PHONES $1,041.87 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells JAN.FEB.MAR CELL PHONES $1,041.86 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 4/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3 633.61 Ref;r 4i3~4 WAllin' JE~N~ ~R~N Oash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 ..... Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250 00 R~fer 4i304 WASHDEPO~- ~Cash Payment 't~,,.~'~nvoice 2360 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SQUAD 640 WASH $3.73 Transaction Date 4/7/2004 -898- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 43 Current Period: April 2004 Refer 41304 WATERTOWN PARTS CENTER Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials HYD FIL $11.73 Invoice 364119 2/2/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials HYD FIL $11.73 Invoice 364119 2/2/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials HYD FIL $11.72 Invoice 364119 2/2/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair HOSES AND HOSE ENDS $8.00 Invoice 367502 3/24/2004 PO 18266 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair HOSES AND HOSE ENDS $140.24 Invoice 367501 3/24/2004 PO 18266 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials FILTERS $37.87 Invoice 364640 2/10/2004 PO 18238 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials FILTERS $37.87 Invoice 364640 2/10/2004 PO 18238 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials FILTERS $37.86 Invoice 364640 2/10/2004 PO 18238 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply GAS CYLINDERS FILLED $28,23 Invoice 365576 2/24/2004 PO 18248 Refer 41304 WEGSCHEID, MARK Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transact on Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 WESTONKA SEWER AND WATER, Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings SINK/FAUCET CONFERENCE ROOM $330.50 Invoice 30074 3/5/2004 Transaction Date 3/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $330.50 Refer 41304 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repa rs & Maint Contract 03-18-0 OVERLAND LN $683.50 Invoice 488 4/1/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-25-04 WILSHIRE/MAYWOOD $2,014.00 Invoice 493 4/1/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 03-26-04 CYPRESS/MAYWOOD $742.00 Invoice 494 4/1/2004 Transact on Date 4/6/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 T~!~!, ............ ~,~,~9'50 Refer 41304 WlLKIE SANDERSON Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 03-31-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $653.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transact on Date 4/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 ~,~!,~a~, .......... ~,3.00 Refer 41304 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 24492-00 3/25/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 24077-00 3/17/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 24884-00 3/30/2004 WINE $1,249.30 WINE $813,70 CREDIT-WINE -$7.OO -899- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 44 Current Period: April 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $493.40 Invoice 25453-00 4/7/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2 549.40 R;fe~ ~i304 ~iN~ ~E~cH~NTS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,159.40 Invoice 93062 3/24/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $4,955.00 Invoice 93497 3/31/2004 Transaction Date 3/25/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,114.40 Refer 41304 WOOLCOTT, BEN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 41304 WORLD CLASS WINES, INCORPO Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $697.00 Invoice 148221 3/29/2004 Transaction Date 3/31/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities 03-04 #0895-951-498-086 $822.79 nvoice 041304 1~"JCTransaction Date 3/30/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $822.79 Refer 41304 ZIMMER pE~y Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 041304 4/13/2004 Transaction Date 3/24/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 -900- / CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 455 TIF 1-2 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 895 FIRE RELIEF FUND City of Mound Payments 04/09/04 9:53 AM Page 45 Current Period: April 2004 10100 Wells Fargo $116,434.59 $15,339.10 $27,182.71 $81,676.03 $2,649.40 $167,179.45 $10,439.32 $39,692.03 $103,542.70 $8,346.48 $4,660.60 $9,641.67 $586,784.08 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $586,784.08 $o.oo $586,784.08 -901 - Engineedng ° Planning ° Surveying April 7, 2O04 Ms. Kandis Hanson City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound Lost Lake Crreenway S.P. 145-090-01 TEAX 2700 (28) Partial Payment MFRA #13566 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Environmental Associates Payment Request No. 4 for work completed through March 31, 2004 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $73,615.75. Included under Supplemental Agreement No. 2 is an additional $13,217.66 for more debris that had to be handled as potentially hazardous and disposed of as contaminated material at a MPCA approved landfill. This material also came from the City owned property at the east side of the channel. Also included in this payment request is $1,434.38 in extra minor work covered under Work Order No. 1. We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director Enclosure s:Xmain:kmou 13566Xcorrespondencekpart-pay4.7 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra.com -902- -903- C ~~- - - ~ .... g ..... ~. ~~ ~ ..... · · ~' ~' ~' - m ~ ~,-~-~ ~ ~-- ~o~ooo~o~*o~ .... ~ ~ ......... o .... oooooooo~oo~ ~ ~ ~ DOC: m:a u~.-I C -904- Z m c~ m z m~ -905- C C~ 9 ........ o. 0 . . ~ . .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -906- o~ Zz| -907- 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 CITY OF MOUND PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com April 7, 2004 TO: FROM: RE' Mayor and City Council Bonnie Ritter Public Gathering Permit Request Attached for your consideration is a copy of the application for a Public Gathering Permit submitted by the Minnetonka Classic Bass Club, to hold a fishing contest weigh- in at Mound Bay Park on June 5, 2004, from noon to 5:00 p.m. The $300 fee has been received. printed on recycled paper -908- 04/05/2004 01:31 FAX 0524?20620 CITY OF MOLq~q) ~001 CITY OF MOUND SM1 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, _MINNESOTA $$$64 PUBLIC GAnG PERMIT PAID APR 6 2004 . GITY OF MOUND Use of a public park or commoas by any group consisting of 15 or more individuaiz. Use is not to intent, re with traffic and general usc of ~he l~rk or commom or to be beyond the ability of ~e police ia maintai-i-[ order. NO LIOUOR OR B~-~'-~u. MAY BE US~ 1N ANY OF ~ CITY PARKS OR BU~.~INGS. Oroup is to remove all litter a~d trash and provide a deposit to inmate cleaning up of the park area. PERMIT FEE: $300/DAY Expect~ A 'telepl~one ~o. Hom~: -909- ~ RECEIPT CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364.1687 heceived of ~~~,~_~ '-~:~, ~. ~. :" ,~ Date .o. 5~',,. 1 08 Fund Object Dept. Amount ~ Description i _ Received By -910- Minnetonka Classic Bass Club Presents the 24th Annual MINNETONKA CLASSIC BASS TOURNAMENTs-vJ TWo PERSON TEAM TOURNAMENT Over $35,000 in Cash & Prizes! ON BEAUTIFUL LAKE MINNETONKA - MINNEAPOLIS, MN $$ PRIZE MONEY BASED ON 125 TEAMS $$ 1st .'. ............. $ 10,000 2nd ............... $ 5,000 3rd ..... . .......... $ 3,000 4th .............. $ 2,000 5t~ .............. $ 1,500 6th .............. $' 1,300 7t~ .............. $ 1,200 8t~ .............. $1,000 9th .............. $ 900 10th-:~ ........... $ 800 i 1 -- 15th ....... $ 600 16 - 20th ....... $ 400 21 - 25t~ ....... $ 300 Big Bass ....... $1,000 MINNESOTA B.A..S.S. FEDERATION SANCTIONED-RULES SIMILAR TO B.A.S.S. 12" MINIMUM - 10 FISH LIMIT PER TEAM TOURNAMENT MEETING: AMERICAN LEGION 233 WILsHIRE BLVD. MOUND, MN 952-472-9582 MAY 30, 2003 ~ 7:00 PM TOURNAMENT FLIGHTS AND EASE-OFF LOCATION TIMES TO BE ANNOUNCED AT PRE-TOURNAMENT MEETING FLIGHT EASE-OFF BY DRAW TOURNAMENT WEIGH-IN SITE: MOUND PARK (sURFS1DE BEACH) TOURNAMENT COORDINATOR- LARRY KROHN 507-357-6605 Entry Fee: $300 per Team c/o Minnetonka Classic, 35244 211th Ave. LeCenter, MN. 56057 Tournament Sponsors: Al's Specialty_- Rochester. Smb's Marine- Alexandria. Riverview Sports & Mari'ne- Elk River. Crystal Pierz Marine- Crystal & Shakopee. Superior Finish- St Michael. Luhr Jensen Lures- Oregon. Kielb & Sons Trophies- Edina. -911 - 2003 Minnetonka Classic Bass Tournament Rules 1. PARTICIPATING AND ELIGABILITY: Any person 18 years of age Or older may participate. Any person age 16 or 17 years of age may participate with parent or guardian or have signed permission slip from same to be eligible to participate, A $300 team entry fee must be paid in full by May 24t~, 2003. Limit is 125 team entries. The Minnetonka Classic Bass Tournament Committee reserves the right to reject any and all entries. L.EGISTR~TION. Each team must return a complete.d~ntry form wzth full payment Post Marked before 7:00 pm May 24 , · 2003. La~e entries will be accepted after May 24 , 2003 with a $25.00 late fee. The rules will be reviewed and ~..~ [,., ~nt~;pret~,~zad boat positions drawn at the pre-tournament meeting at 7:00 pm. May 30~, 2003. Late entries will be ? ~ ~c,i~ed it~he~P.(e.-tournament meeting if team space is aVailable. Please note the $25.00 late entry fee. 3. PR.E-TOURNAMENT Pt~,CTIC~.: Unlimited, up to 5:00 pm. May 30a, 2003. 4. SAFETY:.All contestants'~re rec~ ~oast Guard approved chest-type life preserver at any time the main combustion ~nogme ,s ope. rating. All boa~s a~e~ti~f~ to,~be.eq, uip?ed with az}. OPE .RATIIqCxSAFETY TETI-IER (I{ILL) SWITCH. Any oat 16 feet m length or longer; and/or has abmlt m fuel system xs reqmred to have a fire extinguisher, horn or whistle, and a throwable life preserver. 5. SPORTSMANSHIP: Maximum courtesy will be shown at all times. Any boating rules broken is cause for immediate disqualification...(Speeding in slow zones, etc) Contestants chOosing to have other occupied boats "HOLD" fishing areas will be in violation of this rule section. No alcoholic beverages or illegal drags are allowed to be consumed or in contestants boats. No alcoholic beverages or illegal drugs are to be at or consumed at the weigh-in site. 6. HORSEPOWER REGULATIONS: Engine horsepower must not exceed the maximum horsepower rating plate attached to the boat by the manufacture. 7. NOISE ~SPEED LIMITS: APersonmay not opera~'any Watercraft on the lake so as to exceed a noise level of 80 dbs at 50 ft. The sheriffmay order a noise test. A. 40 miles per hour during the daytime B. 20 miles per hour during the nighttime C. 5 miles per hour in the following areas: quiet water areas, that area within 150 feet of the shore of the lake, that area within 150 feet of an authorized bathing area or swimming, and authorized scuba diver's warning flag, and anchored raft or watercraft, or a dock or pier. 8. ENVIROMENTAL REGULATIONS: Prior to entering Lake Mirmetonka, all watercraft that have been in waters known to be infested with Zebra Mussels, which presently include the Mississippi down stream of St. Anthony Falls and the Mississippi in Iowa, Duluth Harbor and Estuary- Lake Superior, Two Harbors-Harbor area- I. ake Superior, St. Louis River (down stream of Fond'du Lac dam. Wisconsin areas include, Big Elkhart Lake (Sheybotgan Co.), Silver Lake (Kenosha Co.), Lake Geneva (Walworth Co.), Racine Quarry (Racine Co.), Lake Michigan, must be thoroughly dried or washed down with hot water at least 140 degrees F., inside and out. Also, participants must clean all lake weeds from watercraft including live wells and Ct ^ C___o~e_r_in_t~_rnal locations, as we. Il .as e.xte, mal locations including trailers, upon leaving the lake. Additional rules may apply. KLE&EQUIP1V[ENT: Only artificial batts are allowed. No trolling of lures is permitted. No raised platforms allowed on 10. LIVEWELLS: All boats are required to have operating live wells - either recirculating or flow-through. 11. OFF-LIMIT FISHING LOCATIONS: Contestants will not fish any marked spawning grounds. Contestants will not fish within 150 yards of the tournament weigh-in location. Courtesy will be observed while fishing same shorelines. No anchored boat shall permit any competitor to fish within 50 yards of his anchor. 12. OFF/CAL CHECKPOINT: Ease-offloeation and times will be announced at the pre-tournament meeting at 7:00 pm Friday May 30, 2003. Weigh-in will be at Mound Bay Park (Surfsida), Mound, on Lake Mirmetonka. 13. SCORING: Largemouth & Smalimouth bass are eligible to be weighed, with a ten (10) fish limit per team. There will be a 12 inch minimum length (Common Bass Pro Ruler) Per fish. Any short fish weighed in will be deducted a penalty of one (1) pound from the remaining catch. One pound will be deducted for each dead fish weighed in. All measured fish will be closed-mouth and fanned-tailed for measuring. Any te.ar9~ brin ~g~ng more than the tournament limit of l0 fish to the scales will be disqualified. ' · 14. LATE PENALTY: Anyone arriving late for ease-offwill be allowed to fish after boat inspection. Any contestant not in for weigh- in at his or her specified times will be disqualified. 15. TIES: Three levels of tiebreakers will be used.., l~t: Total number offish weighed in by each team, 2~a: largest fish, 3~: Coin toss. 16. GRIEVNACES, RULE INTERPRETATION AND CHANGES: All grievances must be brought before the tournament director before the awards ceremony. Only the Tournament Board of Directors will change the rules of this tournament. Interpretation of these rules is up to the Tournament Board of Directors and will be final in all matters. 17. PUBLICATION RIGHTS: By signing this entry form, each contestant agrees to allow Minnetonka Classic Bass Club the sole and exclusive right to take and publish photographs, motion pictures, and/or videotape footage of him or her as a oontestant and use this material, or dispose of it, in any legal manner without further permission or oompensation to the contestant. -912- z.~,,~.., .:..~..,.. ""~ ...'~.., ~.."~"*'"" ~.~, .:'"TT~ ...... ' ~~ 17445 East H~ 10 E~ ~ver ~ 55330 4090 N. Broadway Rochester, ~ (50~ 282-5532 Me~o (763) 441-1799 Outside Me~o 1-800441-5121 ~.~sspeci~a~ne.com ~.~ve~ewspo~.b~ bt. SI p. F h. (TEAR AND SEND ENTRY TO: Larry Krohn 35244 211a` Ave. LeCenter, lVlN 56057) **TEAM TOURNAMENT ENTRY FORM MUST BE COMPLETED IN FULL** Name: Name: E-Mail Address: E-Mail Address: Address: Address: City/State/Zip: City/State/Zip: MAKE-MODEL/I.D.# OF BOAT: *** POSTED MARKED ENTRY FEE DEADLINE - May 24th, 2003 *** *** $25.00 LATE ENTRY FEE DEADLINE - May 25fa, 2003 *** By entering the 24~ ANNUAL MINNETONKA CLASSIC BASS TOURNAMENT, I agree to follow the rules of the contest. I also agree that the Tournament Officials, including members of the MINNETO~ CLASSIC BASS CLUB, and their sponsors shall assume no liability for an injury that may occur. It is further agreed that the officials of the toumament~ the MINNETONKA CLASSIC BASS CLUB, or their sponsors, assume no responsibility for any theft or damage to contestant's equipment that may occur. The rules will be discussed at the REQUIRED pre-tournament meeting. One person from the team MiJST attend the pre-tournament meeting. SIGNATURE OF PARTICIPANTS IS REQUIRED. SIGNATURES INDICATE PARTICIPANTS AGREE TO POSSIBLE POLYGRAPH ANALYSIS. SIGNATUI~ SOC SEC # DATE SIGNATURE - SOC SEC # DATE -913- I ~, . II L,JII 4090 N. Broadway Rochester, MN (507) 282-5532 www. alsspecialtymarine.com 17445 East Hwy 10 Elk River M2N 55330 Metro: (763) 441-1799 Non-Metro: 1-800-441-5121 www.riverviewsport, biz B~d Larry Krohn Minnetonka Classic Bass Club 35244 21 lla Ave. LeCenter, MN 56057 -914- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound,com April 8, 2004 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bonnie Ritter RE: Requests from Mark Lee for Art-in-the-Park Attached are applications for a Public Gathering Permit and Transient Merchant License, along with a letter, as submitted by Mark Lee for an Art-in-the-Park event at Mound Bay Park on August 21 and 22, 2004. He has the Mound Depot reserved for these days so there is no conflict with another renter. City Staff has met alone, and with Mr. Lee regarding his request and we believe that concerns have been addressed and satisfied. Following is a recap of these points of discussion, which have been agreed upon by applicant and City Staff. Depot Depot Parking Lot parking Lot at Ramp Does not have air conditioning Bathrooms are not for public use Exclusive use OK, with spaces adjacent to Park being used for food vendor parking, and spaces adjacent to boulevard left for loading and unloading, plus honoring of handicapped space. No anchoring stakes in parking lot (new asphalt) Must use pads (plywood) with outriggers Provide own dumpster and garbage removal for food vendors OK to use 13 single spaces adjacent to park, to be utilized by vendor trailers (used to store and haul goods) Launch must remain open, along with remainder of lot Chapman Place must be notified of event and what to expect along with neighboring houSes ,t ~, , Il , t,Jll Electricity Toilet Facilities Garba.qe Fair Layout Driving Across Park Banners Grills in Park None provided. Electrical hook-ups there are ina~dequate to handle vendors One regular and one handicapped unit there for summer use Must supply own porta-potties and schedule for daily pumping Must provide own dumpster- especially for food vendors at Depot City will place 8 garbage cans throughout park and applicant will purchase adequate garbage bags from the City Responsible for all garbage for the week-end, including city containers - empty each day Applicant will schedule garbage pick-up for Saturday and Sunday mornings, as well as at the conclusion of the event. Applicant indicated possibility of having Boy Scouts help with clean-up. It was noted that applicant has $400 damage deposit with the City for the Depot rental, as a backup and assurance that clean-up is adequate. Supply diagram of fair layout, showing all uses and what is parked where. No camping or overnight use of Mound Bay Park is allowed. Applicant will contact Westonka Schools for possibility of using their lot for any overnights required. Applicant asked if vendors can drive across the park for set- up if the ground is dry and hard enough. He under- stands that if any of the park grounds are damaged that he is responsible for paying for restoration to its original state. He agrees with this. Cannot be attached to trees. Must use poles, and Staff indicated that the poles used for Music In the Park can be used for this event's banner. OK to bag with garbage bags, designating closed for use during event. 2 -916- Shuffle Buses Boat Traffic Emergency Calls to City Insurance Fire Inspection Fees Police concerned because there is not enough room - to maneuver bus safely in Ramp Lot, so suggested that shuttle use the turn around Highland Park as their route. Safety cones can be placed along curb adjacent to park for shuffle stop. Applicant will also talk with Gillespie Center abQu~ use of their shuffle Applicant-pl.ans-on-having-person~distfibufing- maps shewing parking lots available for use, and shuttle pick-up points, Boats can use city dock, on first-come-first-serve basis, along with beaching adjacent to park, outside the swim buoys. Any overtime of city employees must be paid by applicant. Appropriate Certificates of Insurance must be supplied prior to event showing City of Mound as "also insured" (Liability at event, parking areas, and shuttle) There will be a Fire Inspection done by Mound Fire Department prior to opening of event The normal fee for a Transient Merchant license is $30/day or $50/week, which would apply here. The fee for a public gathering permit is $300/day. If all appropriate fees were to be collected, using 50 vendors and two days of public gathering, the total due would be $3100. The applicant is requesting to pay a total of $2000 for ail fees involved. Staff feels that because the number of vendors is an unknown at this point, and this is an inaugural event that we hope is successful and repeats, that this $2000 all inclusive fee be approved. 3 -917- Mark Lee 1989 Lakeside Lane Mound, MN 55364 952-472-0389 fax: 952-472-5419 To Mayor Pat Meisel and the Mound City Council; y name ~s Mark Lee and I m writing to ask permission to stage and r~romote a Mound Art in th - st nd - - - e Park event on August 21 and 22 . Hours for the event would be 9AM-5PM on Saturday and 11AM-4PM on Sunday. Set-up would be 4-10PM on Friday. This event would be free to the public. My family and I have an extensive background in promoting Art Fairs/Craft Fairs, and exhibit at multiple area fairs, including the MN State Fair, Excelsior Art Fair, Uptown Art Fair, and the Edina Art Fair. I have lived in Mound since 1999 and believe the Mound Bay City Park to be an excellent location for an event. If you've never been to an outdoor art fair, the vendors will each set-up a 1 Ox 10 tent to display and sell their merchandise. We will coordinate locations for the tents, food vendors, etc. One of our main objectives would be to place the vendors in such a way so that people who aren't at the park for the Art Fair can still use the beach, playground equipment, etc. The event would be called the "Mound Art-in-the-Park", but would actually be more of a family event, encompassing art, fine crafts, kids events (face painting, magicians, etc.), and food. Our goal for the first year would be to have 50 art/craft vendors and 5 food vendors. It is always important to "jury" an event such as this so that it is truly an Art/Craft Fair, and not a flea market. A health inspector would be on hand Saturday morning to inspect the food booths. We foresee our'biggest challenge with this event to be parking. I have met with Police Chief Jim Kurtz and Officer John McKinley about this subject, and with their input our plan is to rent a school bus and shuttle people from the Our Lady of the Lake parking lot to the Mound Bay Park. I have spoken with Rhonda at Our Lady of the Lake and they have agreed to let us use their parking lot since the event is before mass on Saturday and after mass on Sunday. Because this is an inaugural event, we are only estimating the number of parking spots we will need. If the Our Lady of the Lake parking lot fills up, we have spoken with Pastor Tom Evans at Mount Olive Lutheran Church and gotten permission to use their parking lot. We will provide signs to both of these lots as needed. There is a wedding scheduled at the Gilespie Center that Saturday, but we have been given permission from Linda to use that lot on Sunday. We would handle all advertising, applications, insurance, additional bathrooms, evening security, layout, transportation, garbage, clean-up, etc. -918- We are asking for the following from the City: .............. . - ,- ~ ............ ~- .~:- :::::4: ~::x:- x;. x;.~t ist ~tii ~u~,U~:/:~nd ~'T-heTlS~ihn~'~w0u-[d-~:~ ~Permission to hang a oanner ~n tne pan~ llont mu~u, ~,~ · be hung between trees and along Commerce Boulevard. I have spoken with Sarah Smith regard~g this miner and She h~ advised me t° get pemssion from ~e City, ............... 'Use otthe park g~0unds Irom r'nda~;xiigus~2~'''~- ~t arm to Sunday, August Z2-~ m geM. -Declare the charcoal grills in the Mound Bay Park off limits from August 20-22. -Exclusive use of the Mound Bay Park parking lot (next to the Depot) for food vendors and handicap parking from August 20th at 4PM to August 22nd at 8PM. -Exclusive use of the 13 single stall parking spots at the public launch next to the Mound Bay Park (we will not be using the extended vehicle/trailer parking spots) from August 20th at 4PM to August 22nd at 8PM. -Accept payment of $2000 to cover the Public Gathering Permit and the Transient Merchant License for all vendors selling in the Mound Bay Park from August 21-22. We hope that this covers most of your questions and concerns, and feel that this has the makings for a very successful event for the Mound Westonka Community. Respectfully Yours- Mark Lee -919- COun try Arts ra-fts _ ._ ) am - 3:00 pm Sponsored'iby Heal Contact Kelly Cadt ? ,dTown Hall & Activity )ne block east of Hwy 32) .=Wood Wisconsin ,~Sponsored by McCaslin Lions Club ~hibitors Welcome br~:more Information carl: 715-276-3956 www. decaturcelebration,com c -920- 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 ................... P_H L(952) _4._7.2:06QQ FAX; (952~- 47~-O620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com April 7, 2004 TO: FROM: RE: Mayor and City Council Bonnie Ritter Transient Merchant License Request Attached for your consideration is a copy of the application for a Transient Merchant License submitted by Robert Bittle for the Northwest Tonka Lions. It is to sell various eats at Mound Bay Park during Music In the Park, and during various fishing contests. printed on recycled paper :-921 ![ $50.00 One Week or $75.00 One Month which License is ReqUested] $200.00 One Year LICENSE # CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA, 55364 T~NSIE~ 1VI~ANT LICENSE -- nOME PHONE TYPE OF BUSINESS OR DESC~PTION OF THINGS TO BE SOLD: BUS,NESS NAME ~ ~~ ~/~US. PHONE ~: BUSINESS ADDRESS: PLACE BUS'ESS IS TO BE CARRIED ON: RESIDENCE OF THE APPLICANT SALES TAX #: FOR THE LAST (5) YEARS: ,~~E SALES PEOPLE FULL NAMES & DRIVER'S LICENSE #'S & DATES OF BIRTH ~FE~NCES: (GIVE NAMES, ADD~SSES AND PHONE ~ OF THREE) DATE OFFICE USE ONLY SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT AUTHORIZATION - POLICE DEPT. --922 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the J~___~ay of 3~'-~, 2004 by and between, the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter *'City") and Orvin B~a, Clifford schmidt, Jr, Michael Castiglione, Paul Glynn, James Ostman and Pat Buffington, (Collectively, ("Holders"). 1. The City operates a public recreation program which includes the operation of public parks and the operation of a municipal dock program. 2. Avalon Park is one of the city's public parks; and a multiple dock containing six permanent slips located on the shoreline of Avalon Park is a part of the municipal dock program. 3. The Holders are the holders of the 2004 dock licenses for the six slips located on the Avalon Park dock. 4. The Holders have offered to install a security light within the Park adjacent to the Avalon Park dock and shore power for the six permanent slips (the "Work") subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter contained. 5. The City has agreed to permit the Owners to undertake the Work subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter contained. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and their mutual promises the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. Right of Entry. City hereby grants to the Holders, their agents, and contractors permission to enter upon Avalon Park for the purpose of constructing the Work all in conformity with the plans and design contained in the attached Exhibit A. The Work is to be commenced and completed between the dates of March 22, 2004 and June 1, 2004. The Holders will give the City at least 24 hours advance notice before commencing the Work, and will be completed with the Work not later than 90 days thereafter. 2. Indemnification and Release by Holders. In consideration for such Right of Entry, Holders agree to and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, employees and members fi:om and against any action, claim, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense (including without limitation attomeys' fees and costs) resulting fi:om: (a) any claims or liens which may be attached to City property for labor or materials provided by or at the request of Holders in constructing the Work; (b) injury to or death of persons; (c) property damage; or (d) any claim, damage, action, loss or destruction whatsoever caused by Holders, Holders' agents or contractors in connection with the entry onto the Park to construct the Work pursuant to this Agreement. Holders also hereby release the City, its officers agents and employees from any claim or cause of action, of whatever nature, occasioned by or arising out of the use of the Shore Power or the Security Light. JBD-245280v3 MU220-6 -923- C 3. Acceptance of Work upon Completion. Holders shall promptly notify the City of completion of the Work. Upon such notification the City will inspect the Work to determine whether the Work has been constructed in accordance with Exhibit A. If such is the case, and if the Holders establish that they have fully paid for ail the costs and expenses relating to the Work, the City will notify the Holders of such, and by such notice, ail right title and interest in the Work shall ves! in the City. If the Work has not been constructed as described in Exhibit A, the City shall notify the Holders of all deficiencies, and the Holders shall promptly take such steps as are necessary'to d~orrect the deficiencies t° the acC~t~ee of the Ci6/; 4. Costs and Expenses of Work. The Holders shall be responsible to pay for all labor and materials necessary for construction of the Work, and for all permits and licenses required for the Work.. Prior to entering onto the Park to conduct the Work, the Holders will provide the City with evidence satisfactory to it that the Holders have sufficient funds to pay for the Work on completion. 5. Right to use Shore Power. Following the acceptance of the Work, the Holders shall be entitled to connect to the shore power outlets for so long as they hold valid dock licenses; and have paid, within 30 days of written notice, ail electrical fees and all repair and maintenance costs for the shore power and security lighting and appurtenant structures and wiring. The notice will be directed to all to the Holders, or their successors and contain the total amount of the fees and costs without any allocation among the Holders. It is understood that payment is the joint obligation of all the Holders; and the City may terminate the rights conferred hereunder based on the failure of the Holders to fully pay ail of such fees and costs. 6. Termination. The City may terminate the rights conferred herein upon the giving of 60-day written notice to the Holders. No termination may be made within the first ten years following acceptance of the work unless: (i) the Holders fail to pay, following notice, any part of the costs and fees described in paragraph 5 above; or, (ii) the City in its sole discretion determines that the continuation of the security light or the shore power constitutes a safety hazard, or a nuisance. 7. Governing Law. This Agreement. shall be interpreted in accordance with and be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 8. Notices and Demands. All notices, demands or other communications under this Agreement shall be effective only if made in writing and shall be sufficiently given and deemed given when delivered personally or mailed by certified mail (return receipt requested) or registered mail, postage prepaid, properly addressed as follows: a. To Holders: a. Orvin Burma, 3011 Island View Drive, Mound MN 55364 b. Clifford Schmidt, Jr, 3001 Island View Drive, Mound, MN 55364 c. James Ostman, 2945 Island View Drive, Mound, MN 55364 d. Pat Buffington, 4456 Radnor Road, Mound, MN 55364 e. Paul Glynn, 4600 Cumberland Road, Mound, MN 55364 f. Michael Castiglione, 4600 Cumberland Road, Mound, MN 55364 JBD-245280v3 MU220-6 -924- b. To City: City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota, 55364 or to such other person at such other address as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other as provided in this Section. 91 ........ Ug~ I~/Successors. IndividUals;O'6ther than'' H61de~S; who 0bt~ d6ek lieens6s for .......... fiie'-Av~o~' ~ark multiple dock in future years shall have no right to access the Shore Power until they execute an instrument acceptable to the City whereby they agree to be bound to the provisions of this Agreement. 10. Review. Ao Not later than the first anniversary of the date of this Agreement, the Dock and Commons Advisory Commission will report to the City Council regarding any recommended amendments or modifications to this Agreement. The Commission will seek input from the parties to this Agreement and from any other interested persons in formulating its recommendation. Thereafter, the parties agree that they will continue to cooperate to the best of their ability in the periodic review of the effectiveness of this Agreement, the continuing value of the Security Light and the Shore Power, and any alterations or improvements to them that would be in the best interests of the parties. 11. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto only by written instrument executed in accordance with the same procedures and formality followed for the execution of this Agreement. 12. Counterparts. This Agreement is executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed in their names and behalves and on or as of the date first above written. Orvin Burma, Holder Cli~ord Schmidt, Jr, Holder JBD-245280v3 MU220-6 Jam'es Os~an, Holder -925- Pat Bu~gton, H, gider dj -P%IGI~; Holde~ .......................................................... Michael Castiglione, Hold~/ CITY OF MOUND By Kandis M. Hanson City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~.A~_~day ,2004, by [signature and acknowledgment of all Holders]. NOTARY STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Notary Public The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2004, by Kandis M. Hanson the City Manager of the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. JBD-245280v3 MU220-6 of -926- Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered Minneapolis, MN 55402 JBD-245280v3 MU220-6 -927- TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MEMORANDUM Kandis Hanson, City Manager Denice Widmer, Administrative Assistant March 31, 2004 Highland Park Grant - Local Resolution Please add the attached "Item 7- Local Government Resolution" to the City Council Agenda for approval at the first meeting in April. Also attached is the Project Narrative regarding the Highland Park Grant. We are too late to have this grant considered for 2004, but the area Grant Manager stated that if we get aH the paperwork to him, he will review it for us to see what needs to be added, etc, in order to be considered for this grant, or a similar one, in 2005. There is a play structure replacement schedule that calls for at least one structure to be replaced every year until the year 2009. I would like to submit the grant application in its entirety to the Grant Manager for his advice in order to ensure approval for play structure replacement grants in the coming years. C -928- ITEM 7 - LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that The City of Mound act as legal sponsor for the (Ap~i~nt) project contained in the Outdoor Recreation Grnnt Program Application to be submitted on and that ~and~ K Han.~on ._ is hereby authorized C ity-'Mana-ger to apply to the Depart~nent of Natural Resources for funding of this project on behalf of ThE city of Mound (Apparent) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that The City of Mound has the legal authority (~t) to apply for financial assistance, and financial capability to meet the match requirement and ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its design life. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that The City of Mound has not incurred any costs described on Item 5 and has not entered into a written purchase agreement for the property described on Item 4. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state, The ¢i ty of Mound may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota (~) for the above-referenced project, and that The Cit¥ of Mound certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement including dedicating the park property for outdoor recreation uses into perpetuity. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that gandi ~ Hanson is hereby C ..... l~y man u . · . authorized to execute such agreements as are necessaryto unplement the project on behalf of the applicant. I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the of The City of Mound on City £nunci 1 (city Co,m~ ~ ~ ~.) SIGNED: WITNESSED: (s~) (s~) trine) (n~) Crib) -929- C ITEM 2 - PROJECT NARRATIVE The City of Mound recognizes that in order to stay competitive with surrounding cities such as Orono, Minnetrista, and Excelsior, it is imperative that its parks be improved to encourage and enhance public enjoyment for leisure and recreational purposes. In 2003, the Mound Park and Open Space Advisory Commission (POSAC) selected Highlands Park, a 2.5 acre park, to kick off.the Parks Improvement Campaign. Although officially -P~c~nYas~d b~ the-City iff 1985~'Highl~dS park vqas deSignated-and U§ed aS-a-park for more than ten years prior to that purchaSe. S~mated between Glenwood Road to ihd no~ - Highland Boulevard to the eaSt, Fairfield Road to the south, and Holt Lane to the west, Highlands is one of the City's largest and most accessible parks. With its ball field, play structure, play area and open green space, the park is the perfect setting for the summer recreation programs sponsored by Westonka Community Education. In order to continue to attract not only our own citizens, but citizens from surrounding communities to participate in these programs, POSAC agreed that major improvements needed to be made to Highlands Park. On January 9, 2003, POSAC successfully made a motion to have the new play structure funded out of the Park Dedication Fund. As part of an agreement with the City of Mound, contractors deposit monies in this account to fund not only parks in their developments, but to fund other park projects throughout the city aS well. On February 24, 2004, the City Council approved the expenditure of $35,000.00 for the play structure at Highlands Park from the Park Dedication Fund. Park staff will do the site preparation, the installation and completion of the site at an additional cost of $20,000.00 as part of their daily work aSsignments. On May 8, 2003, a Public Hearing was held to discuss the improvements to Highlands Park. Following discussion, a decision waS made that the Highlands Park improvements would take place in two phaSes: .PhaSe One, expected to be completed by spring of 2005, is the removal of the old play structure and the installation of a new play structure that meets today's stringent safety standards. .PhaSe Two, expected to be completed by the year 2007, is the addition of picnic shelters, a basketball court, park benches, picnic tables, drinking fountain, lighting and improvements to the ball field, landscaping and development of the open green space. At this time, the City of Mound is requesting grant funding for PhaSe One of the Highlands Park Improvement Project. The existing play structure, installed in 1980, poses a safety hazard and is scheduled for removal in the spring of 2004. This project, approved for $35,000.00, to be paid out of the Park Dedication Fund and $20,000.00 out of the Parks Budget, will enhance and encourage public usage for leisure and recreational purposes. -930- cHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax http://www, kennedy-graven.com ROBERT J. LINDALI, April 5,2004 Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9219 Real Propmy Law Specialist, Cra'tiffed by Minnesota State Bar Asm. VIA FACSIMILE 692-2774 AND U.S. MAll. Daniel N. Rosen, Esq. Rosen & Rosen, LLC 150 South Fifth Street Suite 3250 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: CiW of Mound v. Balboa Center Limited Partnership, et al, Hennepin County District Court File No. CD-2738 Driveway Easement - Offer of Settlement Dear Dan: On March 31, 2004, at the hearing before Judge Crump, I presented the condemnation petition and quick take motion for the taking of a non-exclusive permanent driveway easement in this matter ("City Action") burdening the Balboa Center Limited Partnership ("Balboa") property on the north side of Shoreline Drive ("Parcel 14") for the benefit of the abutting Roger Reed property ("Parcel 18"). You objected to the public purpose for the taking unless the City of Mound would stipulate that leaving a property with only right in-right out access would cause a public safety problem. The City of Mound is reluctant to categorically say that all such situations cause public safety problems. The City has undertaken to acquire the easement in this case because the facts of this' case provided an opportunity to improve traffic control and public safety as compared to the circumstances without taking the easement. You and I have since talked further and you explained that Balboa is concerned about its property south of Shoreline Drive ("Parcel 15") and lying between SuperAmerica (on the east) and the City owned property (''City Parcel") (on the West) also being left with only fight in-fight out access following the County Road 15 realignment project ("Project"). As you know, the City of Mound and Hennepin County are jointly undertaking the Project pursuant to cooperative fight of way and construction agreements. The City has undertaken the City Action and Hennepin County has commenced Hennepin County District Court File No. CD-2744 ("County Action") to acquire right of way for the Project. The Balboa property which is the subject of the City Action is also Parcel 14 in the County Action. The Balboa property which is south of Shoreline Drive and west of SuperAmerica is Parcel 15 in the County Action. Subject to City Council approval, I propose the settlement of the City Action and partial settlement of the County Action as follows: RJL-246090vl MU200-92 -931 - Dan Rosen Letter April 5, 2OO4 Page 2 The City would convey to Balboa and its successors and assigns as owners and mortgagees of Parcel 15 a non-exclusive permanent driveway easement for the benefit of Parcel 15 over the City parcel. The easement would be substantially the same size and Shape as is Proposed to be acquired by the City in the City Action over Parcel 14 for the benefit of'Parcel 18 (see attached map). Balboa would w/thdraw its objections to the public purpose of the City's taking in the City Action and would convey the easement over Parcel 14 for the benefit of, Parcel 18 to the City without payment of compensation and/or stipulate to a commissioners' award of compensation for.the taking in the amount of $1.00. o Balboa would waive reimbursement of appraisal fees in the City Action. Balboa would waive any claim of, damages due to loss of access as to Parcel 15 in the County Action. This offer will be terminated if nOt accepted in writing by 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 8, 2004, as we will wish to submit it to the City Council for approval at its April 13, 2004, meeting in advance of the April 15, 2004, adjourned court hearing in the City Action. You may confirm Balboa's agreement by countersigning this letter below. RJL:peb Enclosure cc: Kandis Hanson, City Manager Carlton Moore, City Director of Public Works John Cameron, City Engineer John Dean, City Attorney John March, Assistant County Attorney The foregoing offer of settlement is agreed to on behalf, of Balboa Center Limited Parmership. Daniel N. Rosen, Its Attorney RJL~246090vl MU200-92 -932- INPLACE "' ~ BITUMINOUS ~ CURB iROTECT SIGN WITH LAW OFF ICE 5424 CURB- I~L~¢i 61i!JI4INDUS '"" [T, CURB I OTHENS . ~., "' i / I GRADE TO DRAIN TO 454+68.8, RT.184 FT., ELEV. CiTY S UNASSIGNED) · BALBOA 2,.J 5371 MINNEE 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Memorandum To: HonOrable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director Date: April 5, 2004 Re: 2002 Kells Lane Street Vacation - 2004 Amended Resolution Background In 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 02-37 approving the vacation of a portion of Kells Lane abutting the Jonathon Paul and Jeff and Pam Paul properties on Wilshire Boulevard subject to conditions including the sale of the involved portion of Lot 6, Wychwood to abutting property owners and preparation of legal descriptions. As the Council is aware, the City closed on the property in April 2003. It is City staff's understanding that Jeff and Pam Paul are in the process of selling their dock lot and as part of the process, the Hennepin County Examiner of Titles has request the adoption of an amended resolution to include the legal description of the portion of Kells Lane which was vacated by the City in 2002 and also indicate that the involved conditions have been satisfied. It is important to note that the legal description for the subject area was prepared after the City Coundl approved the street vacation as set forth in Condition No. 1. Therefore, City staff has prepared a new resolution to include the legal description which was prepared by Schoell & Madson as well as to remove the previously- referenced conditions with the exception of the provision to retain any and/or all existing utility easements. Recommendation City staff respectfully requests approval of the resolution. Attachments · Memorandums dated March 27, 2004 and Apdl 6, 2004 from Ed Bock of Hennepin County -934- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #04- A RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING RESOLUTION NO. 02-37 REGARDING VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE KELLS LANE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO LOTS 24, 25, AND 26, BLOCK 24, SETON ADDITION TO INCLUDE THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INVOLVED PORTION AND REFLECTING SATISFATION OF THE CONDITIONS P&Z CASE ff~)1-46 WHEREAS, the co-applicants, Jonathon Paul and Jeff and Pamela Paul, have submitted an application to a vacate a portion of Kells Lane. As co-applicants, the parties represent 2 of the 3 landowners adjacent to the portions of Kells Lane requested for vacation; and, WHEREAS, it is the desire of the applicants to incorporate the vacated area into their respective properties to allow them to utilize this yard space as private property with those rights afforded to it; and, WHEREAS, the entire 33 feet width of Kells Lane was dedicated with the Seton Addition plat and vacation of any land within Kells Lane will attach to the adjacent lots north of the road; and, WHEREAS, it appears that Kells Lane was originally platted for use as a fire lane to connect Wilshire Blvd. to Black Lake. It also served as a connection for public access to Black Lake; and, WHEREAS, since the time of platting, the City has provided public water service to serve fire fighting needs. The City has also acquired public lands south of Kells Lane, Lots 2-6, Wychwood, that provide additional public access to Black Lake; and, WHEREAS, the vacation of portions of Kells Lane will also require that the Jeff and Para Paul property be provided access to a public roadway to ensure the vacation does not render their property land locked; and, WHEREAS, as a part of the vacation, the City will enter into separate transactions with Jeff and Pam Paul and John Paul to release portions of Lot 6, Wychwood, to provide additional property and public roadway access; and, 1 -935- C WHEREAS, Staff has reviewed the application and recommended the vacation be approved consistent with the January 3, 2002 Planning Report, the February 14, 2002 Executive Summary Report, and June 13, 2001 and January 2, 2002 City Engineer Reports; and, WHEREAS, the request has been reviewed and recommended for approval by the Parks and Open Space and Docks and Commissions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request and recommended Council approval of the vacation; and WHEREAS, City of Mound Resolution No. 02-37 was adopted on February 26, 2002 which approved the vacation of a portion of Kells Lane subject to conditions including the preparation of a detailed legal description. WHEREAS, the applicants prepared the legal description for the involved portion of Kells Lane to be vacated which were reviewed and approved by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, all other conditions as outlined in Resolution No. 02-37 have been satisfied on the basis that all previously-existing utility easements shall be retained within the vacated portion of Kells Lane. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota approves the vacation of that portion of Kells Lane described on the attached Exhibit A on the condition that all existing utility easements shall be retained within the vacated portion. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, the following findings to support the vacation request: 1. Kells Lane is no longer needed as a fire lane to provide water access for fire fighting needs. 2. Kells Lane is not a logical public access connection to Black Lake rather, the City property provides this connection. 3. The vacation, in conjunction with the sale of portions of Lot 6, will afford Jeff and Para Paul public roadway access to their property. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of April, 2005. Mayor Pat Meisel 2 -936- Attest: Bonnie Rifler, City Clerk 3 -937- C EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION FOR STREET VACATION That part of Kells Lane as delineated and dedicated on the plat of SETON, according to the plat of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota and now to be vacated, which lies between the southerly extension of the westerly line of Lot 24, Block 24, said plat of SETON and a line described as beginning at the southeast comer of Lot 26, Block 24, said plat of SETON and running southwesterly to the northeast comer of Lot 6, Block 1, in the plat of WYCHWOOD, according to the plat of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and said line there terminating. Said part contains 4,448 square feet or 0.102 acres, more or less. -938- FROM : P,S, PAUL COMPANY PHONE NO. : I 612 9~3 3257 MAR, 30 2004 11:36AM P2 Hennepin County Memo Hennepin County Examiner of Titles Office A-70t Government Center 300 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55487-0071 Phone: 612-348-3191 Fax: 612-348-3872 March 24, 2004 To: JEFFERY L. PAUL From: EDWARD A. BOCK, JR. EXAMINER OF TITLES Subject: VACATED KELLS LANE (City of Mound Resolution No. 02-37) An Examiner's Directive, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 508.73, Subd. 3, adding land in a vacated street to Certificate of Title No. 1033702 cgn.not be issued for the following reasons: 1. The vacation resolution does not include a definite legal description. The resolution refers to "that portion of K¢lls Lane depicted in Exhibit B," but neither au Exhibit B nor a depiction are attached. Two pages containing legal descriptions drafted by Theodore D. Kemna are attached, but cannot be considered part of the resolution.. 2. The vacation is subject to a number of conditions (specifically numbers 1", 4, 6 a~id 7) ~hich · may not have been fulfilled. I recommend that au amended Vacation Resolution be obtained which contains a proper legal description, but which i.s not subject to conditions, In the alternative, a Petition in a Proceeding SubSequent to Initial Re~stration could be filed, pursuant to MinnesOta Statute, Section 508,73, Subd, 3, and Rule 213, ~esota General Rules of Practice, rcque~g an Order of the COurt adding land in a vacated street to the ceffificate oftitie. EAB -939- Apr-06-04 lZ:O?pm From-HENN CO EXAM OF TITLES +6123483872 T-376 P.02/02 F-T92 Hennepin County Memo Hennepin County Examiner of Titles Office A-701 Government Center 300 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55487-0071 Phone: 612-348-319t Fax: 612-348-3872 Date: To: From: Subject: April 6, 2004 SARAH SMITH CITY OF MOUND, PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT EDWARD A. BOCK, IR. EXAMINER OF TITLES VACATED KELLS LANE (Your Memo of April 6, 2004) A Resolution similar to the dratt which you sent mc with your above refereaccd Memo would be sufficient to allow an Examiner's Directive to be issued regarding the portion of thc vacated street which abuts the land described m Certificate of Title No. 1033702 (owned by Jcffey L. Paul). EAB C~ -940- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472o3190 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Coundl From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: Apdl 7, 2004 Re: Submittal of TOD Grant Application As the City Council may be aware, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners included $2 million in bonding for transit projects in the county for 2004. These funds can be made available either as grants or loans. Staff met with representatives from Hennepin County Community Works and Transit and MTC on Apdl 5th to discuss the possibility of submitting an application to Hennepin County to request Transit Oriented Development (TOD) funding to assist with construction of a parking deck in the downtown area. The preferred location is the True Value Distdct as referenced in the approved 1991 Mound Visions Plan. Due to the proximity of housing in and around the downtown area, the inclusion of designated stalls for park and dde (upper floor) and a MTC transit station, the proposed parking deck meets several of the goals of the program. The estimated cost of the proposed deck is $2 million. However, it is important to note the this year's grant cycle is highly competitive therefore full funding is very unlikely. Additionally, while this project is eady in its development stage, the majority of the proposals that have already submitted are ready to go. Regardless, Hennepin County Staff believes it is important to get the project on the County's radar screen and encouraged submittal of the City's application. Staff also wishes to reaffirm that input from the downtown property owners and businesses is integral to any proposed project and we anticipate meeting with the involved owners regarding the proposal as soon as possible. However, due to the short timeline associated with the turnaround with the grant application these discussions have not yet been undertaken but are pending. -941 - Hennepin County Housing, Community Works & Transit 417 North Fifth Street, Suite 320 Minneapolis, MN 55401-1362 612-348-2215 C Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Funding What is the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Program? The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners included $2 million in bonding for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) in the county's 2004 capital budget. TODs, supported with this funding: Must be in redevelopment areas · Have multi-jurisdictional impact · Enhance transit usage The criteria and guidelines for this fund are designed to support both redevelopment and new construction. TOD projects and de':velopments: , · Reinforce both the community and the transit system · Exhibit a compact and efficient use of available space, rather than auto-oriented sprawl · Contain a diversity and mix of uses with daily conveniences and trahsit at the center · Support a pedestrian-friendly, physical design that encourages walking, bicycling and access for people with physical disabilities · Are a maximum comfortable walking distance to transit (roughly one-fourth mile for existing transit stops or one-half mile for rail-based) Who is eligible for TOD funding? · Statutory or home-rule-charter cities or towns and development authorities (e.g., housing and redevelopment authority, economic development authority or port authority) · Private entities · Hennepin County and the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority What areas are eligible for TOD funds? Funding is only available to multi-jurisdictional programs and projects, located: · In either a county or local redevelopment area · Within or directly adjacent to Hennepin County transit corridors, and/or · Where new or enhanced transit services supporting county strategies are taking place What activities are eligible for TOD funding? Projects must serve a public purpose and address one or more of the following: · Community con'idor connections -942- Housing rehabilitation and removal Industrial polluted land cleanup Environmental cleanup Property acquisition · Development and redevelopment of housing and existing commercial property · Job creation Eligible activities and use of funds include: · Acquire real property to remove, prevent or reduce blight, blighting factors or causes of blight. · Clear acquired property and install streets, utilities and site improvements for uses in accordance with the redevelopment project. · Sell or lease acquired land for uses in accordance with the redevelopment plan. · Prepare and initiate a redevelopment plan, including survey and other, administrative costs. ' · Conduct an urban renewal project. · Other purposes as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002 - the Minnesota redevelopment statute. What funding is available? For 2004, $2 million in capital bond funding is available for TOD proje,cts. These funds may be made available as either grants or loans. How to apply for TOD funds Go the Hennepin County Web site at www.co.hennepin.mn.us, Department of Housing, Community Works and Transit, to access TOD application and guidelines. Deadline: Completed applications must be submitted to the Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works and Transit by 4 p.m. April 16, 2004. For more information or an application package call: ~. Patrick-.Conno-yT/Economic Development Project Goordinator.'-61'2'~348'~2'9-t-5 .......................... -943- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04- RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE SUBMITTAL OF A TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT GRANT APPLICATION (TOD) TO HENNEPIN COUNTY REQUESTING FUNDING FOR A MULTI-USE PARKING DECK AND TRANSIT STATION IN DOWNTOWN MOUND WHEREAS, the adopted Mound Visions Plan suggests a municipal parking lot in the True Value District and references a future parking deck over that lot; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Mound HRA have entered into a Preliminary Development Agreement with Mound Harbor Renaissance Development for development of the Lost Lake, Auditors Road, and Lake Langdon Districts in the downtown area; and WHEREAS, the proposed redevelopment project will displace the existing Metro Transit shelter, park and ride lot and farmer's market; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that a parking deck in the True Value District can be a shared facility alleviating potential future parking shortages and serving both surrounding retail uses and park & ride users; and WHEREAS, a future transit shelter in the True Value District can be integrated with a farmer's market facility that has strong synergies with the future regional trail and municipal parking deck; and WHEREAS, the City desires to submit an application to Hennepin County for a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) grant to assist with funding of a parking deck to include a park & ride facility and farmer's market and an adjacent MTC transit station in the True Value District to help offset the parking shortage. WHEREAS, the preferred location is on the south side of "new" Shoreline Drive in the True Value District; and WHEREAS, the proposed location has strong pedestrian ties due to its location in the downtown area and close proximity to the former Dakota Railroad line which is to be used for pedestrian/recreational use on an interim basis. -944- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to authorize the submittal of a TOD grant application to request funding to provide funds for a parking deck and transit station in the downtown area in the True Value District. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of April 2004. Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -945- MEMORANDUM To: City Manager Hanson From: Chief Jim Kurtz Date: March 29, 2004 Subject: Life-Saving Award On March 20, 2004, Officers Sussman, Schwalbe, and Sergeant Truax responded to a medical of a man not breathing at 4911 Island view Dr. Upon arrival they found a 59 year-old man who was unconscious, not breathing, and pulse less. They administered CPR for over ten minutes. Remarkable, the man began breathing on his own and has made a full recovery. This is an extraordinary med/cal response that needs to be rewarded. There is no question that Mr. Sprague is alive today because of the rescue efforts of officers, firefighters, and paramedics. I am going to present Life Saving awards to the officers and paramedics. I would like to have an award ceremony and present medals and plaques in front of the city council on Tuesday, April 13th. The family is extremely thankful for the officer's actions and would like to attend the ceremony. C -946- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT INITIAL CALL REPORT pla~ Committed Medical Time Rqao~i I T~e An'iv~ 845 0143 0148 MOC 4931 lslandvicw Dr. Date Report~ Case Number 03-20-04 04-0788 ITime Cl~md garli~t I~te (X) Dt. Rpt (X) Tm.Rpt 0241 Grid NCIC Identifier 50 MN 02713O0 sent for charging Name (L~, Fu~t Middle) Nell Phillip Address City Sine 4931 Islandview Dr., Mound, MN 55364 Zip I Home Phone 952-472-6900 Employer Addr~ C~II Phone Date of Birth Rq~rted Crime 07-24-1944 N B~,~inegs Phone Hours Worked ( ) Missing N~une (Last, Fha. Middle) ( e of Birth City Stnte Zip Home Phone C~ll;Bu~,ness Phone Sc, ars, Mmtca, Tatloo~ Di~figur~meats Relativ&Par~nt )la~ of Birth City/State Injufi~dIIIness Tel~hone Re!~fo,,ahlp Time of Rel~as~ O To Jail ( ) Missing ( )Suspect Nan~ (Last, First Middle) Address City State Zip Home Telephone Coil/Business Phone Scars, Marka, T~oos, Disfi~r~m~ RelativdPamnt Plac~ of Birth City/State Injuries/Illness Relationship Employer & O~upafion Time Released 0 To Jail Booking Number Number & State lvlakc & Model Keys in Vehiole ( )Y ( )N Doors Looked ( )Y ( )iq Name (Last, Firsl Middle) Sprague, Patti Lynn Paymenls Cm~d v~w $ 10-09-1950 Style Color ( ) Y ( ) N Insured by Identifying Characteristics VIN Nu,,,l,~i Address/CRy State/Zip Telephone 952-472-6900 B: H: B: H: 4931 Islandview Dr., Mound, MN 55364 B~ H.' B: Identifying Numbers Value Qty Description N/A Complainant - Signature & Date -947- Assisting O ffi'c~r signed Schwalbe/Truax -Date MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT INITIAL COMPLAINT REPORT CONTINUED OFFICER: SUSSMAN CASE NUMBER: 04-0788 DATE: 03/20]04 C On 03-20-04 at about 0143 hours, Officers Sussman, Schwalbe, and Sgt. Truax responded to a medical at 4931 Islandview Dr. in Mound. The reporting party, Patti Lynn Sprague (10-09-1950), said her husband, Neil Phillip Sprague (07-24-1944), was not breathing and had water coming out of his mouth. Ridgeview Ambulance and Mound Fire Rescue were also dispatched to the scene. It should be noted that Schwalbe was riding with Sussman during field training. Sussman and Schwalbe arrived and went inside the residence. Sussman and Schwalbe were directed into a bedroom by Patti. Sussman observed a male, later identified as Neil, lying on the floor next to the bed on his back. Sussman observed Neil's eyes to be open and non-responsive to hght. Sussman observed that Neil was not breathing. Sussman observed the bed to be wet in a large area where it appeared that Neil was lying .just prior to the 911 call. Neil was tmclothed except for underwear. Sussman checked Nell's pulse and did not feel any pulse. Sussman advised Dispatch that this appeared to be a full arrest. Patti said Nell had been down for about five minutes. Based on Nell's apparent condition, Sussman immediately attached pads from a defibrillator instrument while Sehwalbe prepared oxygen via positive pressure mask. The defibrillator analyzed Neil's heart rhythm and suggested to administer CPR. Sussman then began CPR within about ninety seconds of arrival by doing chest compressions. Sgt. Truax arrived and administered an oral airway and oxygen via positive pressure mask. Sgt. Truax and Sussman continued with two-person CPR for a couple minutes. During CPR, the defibrillator advised SUssman and Truax to Stop CPR briefly while Neil's heart rhythm was analyzed. After each analyzafion, the defibrillator indicated to continue with CPR. At no time during CPR or during analyzation did Sussman or Truax administer a shock via defibrillator to Nell. After a couple minutes, Mound Fire Rescue personnel arrived and took over CPR and monitoring of Neil. Sussman and Schwalbe then met with Path. Patti said Neil and she were sleeping in bed. Patti said Neil uses a breathing apparatus to help him breath due to a sleep-apnea condition. Patti said that Neil appeared to be having trouble with his breathing apparatus and then she did not know if he was breathing at all. Patti said she called 911 and was advised to move Nell onto the floor if he was not breathing. Patti said Nell appeared to have stopped breathing and she moved him to the floor. Patti indicated that Nell is diagnosed with Diabetes and has had other heart related medical problems in the past. Ridgeview Paramedics arrived and assisted Mound Fire personnel with rescue efforts. After several minutes of continued CPR, Sussman was advised by rescue personnel that Neil began to breathe on his own and was reviving. Sussman stayed with Patti and advised her of the medical progress. Sussman and Schwalbe gathered Neil's medication and put it in the ambulance. Sussman observed as Neil was partially conscious and that Paramedics were talking with Neil. Neil was eventually transferred onto a stretcher and then into the ambulance by Paramedics and Fire Rescue personnel. Neil was then transported to Ridgeview Hospital via ambulance. Patti said she was OK to drive and said she would drive to the hospital. Patti had also called some family members to meet her at the hospital. After Neil was transported from the scene, Sussman, Schwalbe, and Sgt. Truax cleared. C lo fl -948- Page 1 of 1 Kandis Hanson From: To: Sent: Subject: "Greg Pederson" <chiefl.@moundfire.com> <kandishanson@Cityofmound.com>; <jameskurtz@city.ofmound.com> Tuesday, April 06, 2004 11:39 AM Life Safety Award The Mound firefighters were all very happy to hear about the recovery of a Mound resident, Nell Sprague. Mr. Sprague was invery bad condition when Mo. und police and fire responded to assist him on 3/20/04. I talked to our firefighters last night about this topic in general,' andupdated them specifically about this incident and Mr. Sprague's current condition. It is Great News! As a department, we do not formally recognize individual firefighters for live saving events like this one. We certainly do however; recognize the magnitude of this event. We know it could have been any of our (36) firefighters on the rescue call that day. If you decide to recognize the efforts of the police officers at an upcoming council meeting, then I would like to invite the five firefighters involved. These five flrefighters would be accepting the recognition for all Mound firefighters. The five MFD personnel on the scene that day were: Kevin Flaig, Jim Casey, Brian Berent, Jason Maas, and John Larson. Thanks GREG Gregory S. Pederson Mound Fire Chief (952) 472-3533 Direct (952) 472-3555 Main (952) 472-3775 Fax -949- 4/6/2004 Engineering · Planning Surveying April 9, 2004 C Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City of Mound 2004 Retaining Wall Replacement Addendum to Feasibility Report 2004 Street Reconstruction Project MFRA #14707 Dear Mayor and Council Members: As requested, we are herein submitting an Addendum to the Feasibility Report previously prepared for the 2004 Street Reconstruction Project. This addendum is for replacement of City maintained retaining walls, located throughout the community. If you have any questions or need additional information on anything in this addendum or the original report, we will be pleased to discuss this further with you at your convenience. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth Enclosure s :h-nain AMou 14707 :\Correspondenceh'uayor4-6 -950- 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra, com Addendum to Feasibility Re£ort for 2004 Street Reconstruction Project 2004 Retaining Wall Replacement When the majority of the City streets were improved in the late 1970s and early 1980s, a large number of retaining walls were constructed as part of the street improvement to minimize the impact on private property. Many of these walls have deteriorated to the point where many need to be completed replaced. The City has determined it would be in the best public interest to undertake a large scale project of replacing these walls rather then keep doing emergency repairs. In 2001 an inspection survey was completed by the same University of Minnesota Intern that inspected all the City streets. As with the streets, the walls were rated as to their condition using criteria that was established by our office. All walls were given a rating between one and five with five being the worst condition, requiring replacement and/or major repairs. These walls would be replaced with modular concrete block type walls, the same as was used in the 2002 project. The majority of the walls are located within City street right-of-way and would be reconstructed in the same general location. However, some do end up on private property and will require obtaining permanent easements. The following is an estimated cost of the total project: Retaining Wall Replacement - 18,000 square feet @ 22.00/SF Contingencies (5 percent) Total Estimated Construction Cost Engineering, Legal, Fiscal, and Administrative Cost (20 percent) Total Estimated Project Cost $ 396,000 $ 2O,OOO $ 416,000 $ 84,00Q $ 500,000 For bonding purposes, it has been suggested by the City's Bond Counsel that the Retaining Wall Replacement Project be combined with the 2004 Street Reconstruction Project. The total estimated cost of the 2004 Street Project is $1,690,000.00, of which approximately $510,000.00 will be paid from the respective utility funds. This will leave approximately $1,180,000.00 for the actual street work, for which 70 percent, or approximately $826,000.00 is proposed for special assessment to the benefiting properties. This amount is approximately 40 percent of the total combined cost of the two projects which easily meets the 20 percent requirement the City must meet in order to issue improvement bonds without holding a special election. The cost of the retaining wall replacement would be paid from the bond proceeds and will not be assessed to adjacent properties. It is the opinion of the Engineer that this improvement project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible and can best be accomplished as described herein. s:\main:Xmou 14707\Reports\addendum4-6 -951 - CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04- RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT FOR RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2004 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted February 24, 2004, a report has been prepared by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., with reference to the Retaining Wall Improvement Project 2004, and this report was received by the Council on April 13, 2004; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-effective and feasible, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: 1. The Council will consider the improvement of such retaining walls in accordance with the report, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $500,000. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of April, 2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -952- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04-__ RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2004 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 24th day of February, 2004, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed Retaining Wall Improvement Project 2004; and WHEREAS, two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 13th day of April, 2004, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cit~/of Mound, Minnesota: 1, Such imprOVement is necessary~ cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution adopted February 24, 2004. 3. McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The City Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. Adopted by the City Council this 13t' day of April, 2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -953- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 7, 2004 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit / Variance(s) - Electrical Substation Expansion APPLICANT: Northern States Power d/b/a Xcel Energy ADDRESS: 5471 Lynwood Boulevard PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 04-01 and 04-02 ZONING: I-1 Industrial COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial C~ SUMMARY At its April 13, 2003 meeting, the City Council will review the application from Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy for a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion / upgrade of the existing electrical substation currently located at 5471 Lynwood Boulevard. The proposal also requires approval of the following variances: Allowed / Existin,o Proposed Variance Building Height Electrical structures Lighting shield extensions 35 FT / 33 FT 46 FT 11 FT 35 FT / 63 FT 81 FT 18 FT Fence Height *6FT /8FT 8FT 2FT National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) requires a minimum fence height of 7 feet which exceeds the City Code requirement which limits fence height to 6 feet in the I-1 District. Existing fence is (8) feet. CUP REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Chapter 350:525 Subd. 3 (B) requires that all requests for conditional use permits are reviewed by the Planning Commission. Additionally, City Code Chapter 350:535 Subd. 3 (C) requires that a public hearing is held by the City Council. -954- Procedurally, state statute requires that the planning agency and/or governing body must hold a public hearing on all requests for conditional use permits and further requires that a Notice of Public Hearing is published at least (10) days in advance of the public hearing and is also mailed to all property owners within (350) feet. Members of the City Council are advised that the Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Laker on April 3, 2004. Additionally, the Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to all affected property owners located within (350) feet on April 1, 2004. 60-DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60-day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much .additionalfime is needed: The CUP and variance(s) application was received and deemed to be complete on January 6, 2004. Members of the City Council are advised that the City executed a 60- day extension on February 23, 2004. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW The application was initially reviewed by the Planning Commission at its March 1, 2004 meeting but was subsequently tabled to address a number of outstanding issues, including but not limited to, the following items: · Evaluation of plans by HKGi to determine whether landscaping could be incorporated into the plan on south side for screening and aesthetic purposes, Members also requested further details regarding the proposed landscaping elements for the west side adjacent to the City stormwater pond and along the north side of Lynwood Blvd. · Information regarding the state statute clause requiring Planning Commission review of property acquisitions and sales. · Additional information from Xcel Energy regarding potential affects of electrical substations on cellular phones, satellite dishes, cable television, etc. · Referral of the project plans to the hotel developer (Rick Bloomquist). At its March 15, 2004 meeting, the Planning Commission continued its review of the application(s) including the following new information: -955- The revised landscaping plan from HKGi was deemed acceptable by Xcel Energy. Both Xcel and Staff have agreed to consider field modifications in the event changes are needed during the construction process. Staff provided copies of the project plans and application materials to Rick Bloomquist and John Seibert, his hotel consultant, on March 3, 2004. According to Mr. Bloomquist, a copy would also be referred to his project architect. Information from Xcel regarding impacts on cellular and / or other types of communication devices as well as satellite and/or cable television etc. was provided and discussed in greater detail at the meeting. According to Xcel, the upgrading station will not adversely impact on these types of communication. In addition to the proposed landscaping revisions, another change to the proposal includes the relocation of the control building from the southeast to the southwest side which is viewedasfavorable.as it will heipscreen the electrical equipment as well as allow for a landsCaping edge/backdrOp. The apPli~nts are proposing to use brick for the new control building. Additionally, the proposed fence to be installed around the facility will be black. Copies of the March 1, 2004 and March 15, 2004 Planning Commission meeting minute excerpts have been provided as attachments. Due to the details associated with the application(s), a full copy of the Planning and Addendum Reports have also been provided. RECOMMENDATION Based on its review, the Planning Commission recommends Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit and variance applications from Xcel Energy to allow expansion/upgrade of the electrical substation loCated subject to conditions. A draft resolution based on the Planning Commission's recommendation has been included. CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 04- , RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS FROM NORTHERN STATES POWER DIB/A XCEL ENERGY TO ALLOW EXPANSION AND UPGRADE OF THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION LOCATED AT 5471 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD P & Z CASE # 04-01 and #04-02 PID: #13-117-24-33-0037 and #13-117-24-33-0097 WHEREAS, the applicant, Northern States Power d/b/a Xcel Energy has submitted a Conditional Use Permit application to allow expansion and upgrade of the existing substation located at 5471 Lynwood Boulevard; and WHEREAS, applications were also submitted requesting variance approval to address the following site related issues: Allowed. / ~ Proposed Variance Building Height Electrical structures Lighting shield extensions Fence Height ;and 35 FT / 33 FT 46 FT 11 FT 35 FT /63 FT 81 FT 18 FT 6FT /8FT 8FT 2FT WHEREAS, the subject site is zoned I-1 Industrial and subject to the provisions of City Code 350:655 and electrical substations are allowed upon approval of a conditional use permit; and -957- WHEREAS, the electrical substation qualifies as an essential service building as defined in City Code Chapter 350:455, Subd. 2 and is therefore not subject to the lot area, lot width, coverage and setback requirements of the I-1 District; and WHEREAS, as electrical substations are allowed by conditional use, the City may place design, size, location and coverage restrictions and may require that the coverage and setbacks conform as close as practical to those otherwise required in the district; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its March 1, 2004 and March 15, 2004 meetings and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and variance applications subject to conditions. .... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the C ty Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City does hereby approve the conditional use permit and variance applications and makes the following findings of fact: a. The existing fence is (8) feet in height and the proposed new fence does not exceed the existing condition. National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) requires a minimum fence height of (7) feet which exceeds the City Code requirement of (6) feet in the I-1 District. c. The use of brick for the exterior of the control is consistent with the City Code regulations. The relocation of the control building to the southwest corner will help screen the electrical equipment and will also provide a backdrop for the landscaping plantings. e. The publication and mailing requirements for the public hearing as set forth in the City Code were satisfied. f. The revised landscaping plan prepared by HKGi was favorably received by the Planning Commission and Staff. g. The height of the electrical structures and lighting shield extensions is the minimum amount possible to accomplish the intended task. -958- The conditional use permit and variance applications are approved subject to the following conditions: a. Grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. b. The screening materials shall be black. c. The applicant and/or designated representative shall be responsible for all required permitting activities. The proposed control building shall be brick. All use, development, construction and operation requirements and standards of the Mound City Code shall apply to and regulate the property in all respects. T~i~S ~'diti0~i 'use :Per~ii and ~a~i~c-e' i~ ~ppr~wd f°~: the f0ii~i~' ~ legally described property: - to be completed - This conditional use permit and variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County and shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The variance is valid for one (1) year following its approval unless an extension is approved by the City Council pursuant to the City Code 350:530, Subd. 2 (E). The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted April 13, 2004 Pat Meisel, Mayor -959- MEETING MINUTES ,MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSIOP MARCH 15, 2004 DRAFT / NOT APRROVED BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #04-01 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE #04-02 VARIANCE 5471 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD- XCEL ENERGY CDD Smith introduced the case indicating it was tabled to address landscaping issues including the south side adjacent to the railroad and on the north side along Lynwood Boulevard. Also addressed was the coordination of storm water pond plantings adjacent to the west, A landscape plan has, beenprepared-to address the identified lands~ping deficiencies~ CDDS~ith identifibd that. cbntadt ~had bbbh ~a'db~ith xcel Energy prior to the meeting and they indicated their support of the plan. Staff also supports the plan. Smith indicated the control building would be moved to an alternate location the west side of the site which should provide additional screening of the equipment. Staff views this as a positive to the site plan. Andy Beckel from Xcel Energy presented the revised location plan for the control house. The original design was modified to better accommodate maintenance issues in the event there are failures and equipment needs to be accessed and replaced. Beckel indicated the southwest corner now provides a better opportunity for screening. Beckel talked about the operating frequencies of the substation equipment and its relationships to other typical consumer electronics. He' indicated there should be no conflict. MOTION by Osmek, second be Schwingler to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Variances. MOTION carried unanimously. -960- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (g52) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT ADDENDUM # 2 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: March 10, 2004 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit / Variance(s) - Electrical Substation Expansion APPLICANT: Northern States Power d/b/a Xcel Energy ADDRESS: 5471 Lynwood Boulevard PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 04-01 and 04-02 P.iD~ -~. ~ 3~._~i~17_24~33.C~'03~ (L0is 2~3~, Koe~le~ ~ddli~ion to M0und~) 13-117-24-33-0097 (Lots 27,28, Koehler's Addition to Mound) ZONING: I-1 Industrial COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial SUMMARY At its March 1, 2004 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the application(s) from Northern States Power Company d/bla Xcel Energy for a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion / upgrade of the existing electrical substation currently located at 5471 Lynwood Boulevard. The proposal also requires approval of the following variances: Allowed I Existin~l Proposed Variance Building Height Electrical structures Lighting shield extensions 35 FT / 33 FT 46 FT 11 FT 35 FT /63 FT 81 FT 18 FT *6 FT / 8 FT 8 FT 2 FT Fence Height The Planning Commission tabled the application In order to address a number of outstanding issues, including but not limited to, the following items: · Evaluation of plans by HKGi to determine whether landscaping could be incorporated into the plan on south side for screening and aesthetic purposes. Members also requested further details regarding the -961 - C proposed landscaping elements for the west side adjacent to the City stormwater pond and along the north side of Lynwood Blvd. · Information regarding the state statute clause requiring Planning Commission review of property acquisitions and sales. Additional information from Xcel Energy regarding potential affects of electrical substations on cellular phones, satellite dishes, cable television, etc. NEW INFORMATION 1. A copy of M.S.S. 462.356, Subd. 2 has been included for review by the Planning Commission. In general, the statute requires planning agency review of property disposals and acquisitions for a determination that the proposal is compliant with theapproved comprehensive plan: Th~ statute als~ inClUdeS a pr0visi0n which states the governing b0dY, bY 2/3 S vote, can dispense planning agency review when it determines that the transaction has no relationship to the comprehensive plan. HKGi, the City's planning consultant, has prepared a revised landscaping plan for the site which includes a planting and screening program for the south side as requested by the Planning Commission. A copy of the proposal was forwarded to Xcel on March 11, 2004 via fax. Preliminary comments from Xcel are as follows: · In general, the plantings proposed for the west side are acceptable. Xcel has concerns about the proposal for the south and north sides and whether or not it will work especially with regard to available space, location of the planting(s) in and around the drainage ditch on the south side and plant selection. · The fence in southwest corner could perhaps be pulled in to allow some additional planting space. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that Public Works Director Carlton Moore, who is a licensed landscaping architect, has reviewed the plan and will be present at the meeting to respond to questions and comments from the Planning Commission. Staff provided copies of the project plans and application materials to Rick Bloomquist and John Seibert, his hotel consultant, on March 3, 2004. According to Mr. Bloomquist, a copy will also be referred to his project architect. -962- o Information from Xcel regarding impacts on cellular and I or other types of communication devices as well as satellite and/or cable television etc. has been included and will be discussed in greater detail as part of the meeting. According to Xcel, the upgrading station will not adversely impact on these types of communication. -963- Page 1 of 1 C 462.356 Procedure to effect plan: generally. Subdivision 1. Recommendations for plan execution. Upon the recommendation by the planning agency of the comprehensive municipal plan or sections thereof, the planning agency shall study and propose to the governing body reasonable and practicable means for putting the plan or section of the plan into effect. Subject to the limitations of the following sections, such means include, but are not limited to, zoning regulations, regulations for the subdivision of land, an official map, a program for coordination of the normal public improvements and services of the municipality, urban renewal and a capital improvements program. Subd. 2. Compliance with plan. After a comprehensive municipal plan or section thereof has been recommended by the planning agency and a copy filed with the governing body, no publicly owned interest in real property witlnin the municipality Shall be acquired or disposed of, nor shall any capital improvement be authorized by the municipality 9.[. speg~q.~.~[~c~o[ agescy thereof or any other political after tine planning agency has reviewed the proposed acquisition, disposal, or capital improvement and reported in writing to the governing body or o~her special district or agency or political subdivision concerned, its findings as to compliance of the proposed acquisition, disposal or improvement with the comprehensive municipal plan. Failure of the planning agency to report on the proposal within 45 days after sucln a reference, or such other period as may be designated by the governing body shall be deemed to have sauisfied uhe requirements of this subdivision. Tlne governing body may, by resolution adopted by two-thirds vote dispense with the requirements of this subdivision when in its judgment it finds that the proposed aoquisition or disposal of real property or capital improvement has no relationship to the comprehensive municipal plan. HIST: 1965 c 6'70 s 6 http ://www. revisor, leg. state, mn. u s/cgi-bin/get st~- 964 -,I 3/2/2004 Page 1 of 1 Sarah Smith From: "Beckel, Andrew P" <Andrew. P.Beckel@xcelenergy.com> To: "Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith(~cityofmound.com> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 4:48 PM Subject: Mound Substation Expansion - Impact on communications Sarah- This letter is in response to the question posed at the 3/1/04 Planning Commission meeting regarding impact of the proposed substation expansion on the use of cell phones, television, and satellite communications. The upgraded station will no adverse effect on these types of communication. Please let me know if you have any further questions on this matter. Regards, Andy -965- 3/11/2004 // -966- aLO:~O ~0 OI ~eN z.a -967- aao:so ~o o~ ue~ il, -968- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUNDADViSORY,,PLAN lNG COMMISSION MARCH 1, 2004 .BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #04-01 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE #04-02 VARIANCE 5471 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD- XCEL ENERGY Xcel Energy has submitted an application to upgrade the existing electrical substation. The project requires the approval of building and fence height variances as well as a conditional use permit. On December 10, 2003, the City Council granted waiver of platting approval to. subdivide.Lots 27 and 28, Koehler's Addition. to.facilitate the land exchange agreement with Xcel Energy. .Discussion Mueller indicated that state statute requires that property given up by the city be reviewed by the Planning Commission to determine if it is the best course of action for the city. This plan did not come to the Planning Commission. He wants this to go forward but wanted to be sure we don't skirt statute requirements so there is no legal problems in the future. Smith said the city attorney would be the best one to approach with this issue. Mueller also felt the developer of the hotel should be made aware of this plan. Andy Beckel (Xcel Energy) reviewed the plan with the Commission in some detail including building design, timeline and landscaping. Michael was concerned about conforming to state statute requirements. He would also like HGKI to review the potential for landscaping on the south side. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Raines, to recommend Council approve the variance providing the following issues are addressed (hotel development, structure enhancement, screening on the north side) Osmek and Raines withdrew the motion. MOTION by Mueller, second by Raines to table the Conditional Use application. Voting for: Mueller, Osmek, Glister, Raines. Voting against: Hasse, Miller, Michael. Issues to be addressed include statutes regarding Planning Commission review of land exchanges, informing hotel developer or plans for the Xcel expansion, screening on south and north sides, transmission levels (cell, television, satellites) -970- Planning Commission Minutes March 1, 2004 MOTION by Mueller, second by Raines, to table the variance application. Voting for: Hasse, Miller, Mueller, Osmek, Glister, Raines. Voting against: Michael. -971 - C 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT ADDENDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: February 27, 2004 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit / Variance(s) - Electrical Substation Expansion APPLICANT: Northern States Power d/b/a Xcel Energy ADDRESS: 5471 Lynwood Boulevard PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 04-01 and 04-02 PID: t3-117-24-33-0037 (Lots 29-31, Koeh er, s Addtonto MoUnd) 13-117-24-33-0097 (Lots 27,28, Koehler's Addition to Mound) ZONING: I-1 Industrial COMPREHENSIVE PLAN' Industrial SUMMARY Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy has submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion / upgrade of the existing electrical substation currently located at 5471 Lynwood Boulevard. Specific details regarding the project are outlined in Planning Report No. 04-01 / 04-02 which was included in the February 2, 2004 Planning Commission agenda. So as to minimize copying time and related costs, the Planning Report has not been reprinted. Planning Commissioners are reminded to bring the February packet to the meeting. NEW INFORMATION Staff met with representatives of Xcel Energy on February 13, 2004 to discuss various issues associated with the application including fencing and landscaping that were referenced in the original Planning Report. With regard to the meeting, the following revisions are being undertaken: a. The chain link fence around the substation will be black. b. The City and Xcel Energy will coordinate the landscaping on the west end of the Xcel site by the proposed stormwater pond. Paul Paige of Hoisington Koegler will prepare the plan for this area. -972- The landscaping along the north side of the Xcel site along Lynwood Boulevard will be extended further west to their driveway. Proposed plantings including species and size will be determined by Paul Paige. The proposed fence along the north side of the Xcel site abutting Lynwood Boulevard cannot be shifted further south due to the location of the equipment. It is anticipated that Xcel Energy will provide photos and/or similar documents (ie. architectural rendering, etc.) for review by the Planning Commission at the meeting. Staff also requested that building material samples be provided. Staff executed a 60~day extension for the land use application(s) on February 23, 2004 as allowed by M.S.S. 15.99. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit and variance(s) to allow expansion of the electrical substation at 5471 Lynwood Boulevard subject to the following conditions: 1. Grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The landscaping plan be revised to incorporate the suggested revisions from Staff. 3. The applicant and/or designated representative shall be responsible for all required permitting activities. 4. All use, development, construction and operation requirements and standards of the Mound City Code shall apply to and regulate the property in all respects. 5. Additional comments from the Planning Commission, City Council and Staff. 2 -973- C CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com February '~" ,.~, 2004 Mi'. Scott .Iohnson Siting and Land Rights Xcel Energy 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401 RE: CUP and Variance(s) Application -['Iris letter is in regard to the land use application(s) you submitted on or about January 6, 2004 for tire proposed electrical substation expansion project. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 15.9% please accept this letter, as'notice from the City of Mound that tile review period for your applications(s) will be extended an additional sixty (60) days. As you are aware, the application(s) was previously scheduled to be heard at tire February 5, 2004 Planning Commission meeting however the meeting was subsequently cancelled due lo inclement weather. Therefore, the purpose for the extension is to allow adequate time to refer the application(s) 1o the Planning Commission for review and recommendation at its next meeting to be held on March I, 2004 and to advance the application(s) on to tile City Council for public hearil'~g as soon as possible thereafter. you have any questions regarding any of' this information, please contact me at 952- 9 47.-.~ 190 Sincerely. - -~ Community Development Director 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 27, 2004 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit / Variance(s) - Electrical Substation Expansion APPLICANT: Northern States Power d/b/a Xcel Energy ADDRESS: 5471 Lynwood Boulevard PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 04-01 and 04-02 PID: 13-117-24-33-0037 (Lots 29-31, Koehler's Addition to Mound) 13-117-24-33-0097 (Lots 27,28, Koehler's Addition to Mound) ZONING: I-1 Industrial COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial SUMMARY Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy has submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion / upgrade of the existing electrical substation currently located at 5471 Lynwood Boulevard. The proposed project also requires the approval of the following variance(s) to address various site related issues: Allowed I Existina Proposed Variance Building Height Electrical structures Lighting shield extensions 35 FT / 33 FT 46 FT 11 FT 35 FT /63 FT 81 FT 18 FT Fence Height *6 FT / 8 FT 8 FT 2 FT · National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) requires a minimum fence height of 7 feet which exceeds the City Code requirement which limits fence height to 6 feet in the I-1 District. -975- PROJECT OVERVIEW In general, the proposed project includes replacement of the existing 65 kV electrical equipment / substation owned by Xcel which is located on the south side of Lynwood Boulevard immediately east of Belmont Avenue with upgraded 115 kV equipment. The new substation will be moved further east from its present location following acquisition of Lots 27 and 28 from the City of Mound. Specific details regarding the project are outlined in the applicant narrative and project plans that have been provided. BACKGROUND Purchase of Lots 23-28, Koehler's Addition to Mound. The City purchased Lots 23- 28, Koehler's Addition to Mound in September 2002 from the Balboa Partnership for the purpose of providing future sites for a new stormwater pond which is needed for the CSAH road project which is scheduled to begin this spring and the Xcel substation expansion project. Waiver of Platting Approval. At its December 10, 2003 meeting, the City Council granted waiver of platting approval pursuant to City Code Chapter 330:12 to subdivide Lots 27 and 28, Koehler's Addition from PID No. 13-117-24-33-0093 to facilitate the land exchange agreement with Xcel Energy. Land Exchange Agreement. The land exchange agreement between the City of Mound and Xcel Energy was executed and closed on December 29, 2004. In summary, the agreement conveyed a portion of the City-owned parcel (Lots 27 and 28) located immediately east of the Xcel substation to Xcel for the Xcel-owned parcel located immediately west of the Xcel substation (PID No. 13-117-24-33-0038). New PID. Effective January 6, 2004, Hennepin County Taxpayer Services assigned a new PID for Lots 27 and 28 as follows: 13-117-24-33-0097. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA In granting a conditional use permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed land use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the conditional use permit review criteria are contained in City Code Chapter 350:525 Subd. 1. CUP REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Chapter 350:525 Subd. 3 (B) requires that all requests for conditional use permits are reviewed by the Planning Commission. Additionally, City Code Chapter 350:535 Subd. 3 (C) requires that a public hearing is held by the City Council. Procedurally, state statute requires that the planning agency and/or governing body must hold a public hearing on all requests for conditional use permits and further requires that a Notice of Public Hearing is published at least (10) days in advance of the public hearing and is also mailed to all property owners within (350) feet. As of this date, the public hearing for review of the application(s) has not been scheduled. 60-DAY PROCESS The conditional use permit and variance(s) application was received and deemed to be complete on January 6, 2004. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny a land use request. ISSUES ANALYSIS Zoning. The subject site is zoned I-1 Industrial and subject to the provisions of City Code 350:655. Electrical substations are allowed in the I-1 District upon approval of a conditional use permit. The following table includes the lot area, width and setback requirements of the I-1 District and also outlines the proposal's conformity with the zoning requirements: Lot Area Width Front Side Rear Setback Setback(s) Setback I-1 13,000 SF 100 FT 30 FT 50 FT when abutting residential 30 FT 15 FT when abutting street 0 FT when abutting railroad Lots 27-31 41,123 SF 250 (+) 31 FT 35 FT- East Side 12 FT 64 FT- West Side (SE corner of structure) The electrical substation qualifies as an essential service building / structure. As set forth in City Code Chapter 350:455, Subd. 2, essential service buildings are not subject to the lot area, lot width, coverage and setback requirements of the I-1 District. However, the City may place design, size, location and coverage restriction on any conditional use permit and may require that the coverage and setbacks conform as clbse as practical to those otherwise required in the district. -977- Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map included in the Mound Comprehensive Plan guides the property for future industrial use. Building Height. Building height is limited to 2 I,~ stories or thirty-five (35) feet in the I- 1 District. The applicant is requesting variance approval to exceed the height requirements for the electrical equipment and lighting shield extension. Landscaping. A proposed landscaping plan was submitted as part of the application materials. Please refer to the memorandum from Public Works Director Carlton Moore and Consultant Planner Loren Gordon for details regarding Staff's review of the proposed plan. Fence Standards. The City's fence regulations are outlined in City Code Section 350:475 and are briefly summarized below: · Fence height is limited to no more than six (6) feet in the commercial and industrials districts and must be measured from the adjoining natural ground. · Acceptable fence materials include chain link and wood. Electric fences and barbed wire fences are prohibited except that barbed wire may be used in the industrial district as an anti-vaulting measure on top of a fence that equals 6 feet in height. In such cases, barbed wire shall not exceed the height of 1-foot above the top of the fence The applicant is requesting variance approval to allow installation of an 8-foot chain link fence to enclose the substation equipment. The fence, as proposed, consists of a galvanized steel mesh fabric that is 7-feet in height and topped with 3 strands of barbed wire extending the fence an additional foot. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) requires a minimum fence height of 7- feet which exceeds local regulations. A copy of the applicable section of the NESC Code has been included as an attachment. Acceptable Building Materials. According to City Code Section 350:790, Subd. 3, no building permit shall be issued for any commercial or industrial structure that contains unadorned, prestressed concrete panels, concrete block or sheet metal, either corregated or plain. Acceptable building materials include wood, stone, brick, block or concrete that incorporates significant textured surfacing, exposed aggregate or other patterning. -978- The use of metal on building materials is to be limited to the trim detailing and/or the use of metal and glass in curtain walls. Architectural metal roof systems and canopies are permitted. The proposed control structure will be a metal frame building with decorative concrete panels mounted on the exterior. It is approximately 24' x 32' in size and will be located in the southeast corner of the site. The existing building will be removed. STAFF REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments for review and comment and are summarized below: City Engineer Cameron Refer to memorandum dated January 29, 2004 which has been included as an attachment. Public Works Supt. Skinner Please refer to comments from City Engineer Cameron. Building Official Simoneau Screening of mechanical equipment required. is Fire Chief Pederson No comments. Parks Supt. Jim Fackler No comments. Public Works Director Moore Significant additional landscaping needs to be added to the proposed plan for screening as Xcel has only proposed landscaping on one side of their property. A revised plan needs to be submitted for review and approval. Police Chief Kurtz Consultant Planner Gordon No comments. Refer to memorandum dated January 29, 2004 which has been included as an attachment. PUBLIC AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable public agencies including the MCWD, the DNR and HCRRA for review and comment. -979- DISCUSSION POINTS It is City staff's understanding that site grading activities will be undertaken in 2004 however the equipment replacement will not occur until 2005 or after. As variance(s) are valid for 1-year following approval, an extension may need to be approved pursuant to City Code Chapter 350:530, Subd. 2 (E). Additional permits, including but not limited to, surface water management, wetlands, and NPDES II will likely be required and must be procured prior to the commencement of any grading and/or site alteration activities. The most significant issues associated with the application include fence material selection and the need for additional landscaping / screening. The parcels owned by Xcel should be combined at Hennepin County following assignment of the new PID for Lots 27-28. Additional details are provided regarding the exterior materials of the proposed control building including the submittal of samples, if appropriate. The relocation of the control building to the southeast corner of the site is viewed as favorable. The landscaping proposed for the new stormwater pond on the east side of Lot 31 includes deciduous plantings and is therefore inadequate in terms of providing proper screening as stated in the applicant's narrative. Therefore, landscaping on the west side of the site will be required. 8. The existing fence is 8-feet in height. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit and variance(s) to allow expansion of the electrical substation at 5471 Lynwood Boulevard subject to the following conditions: Grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2. The screening materials shall be subject to review by the Planning E Commission and approval by the City Council. Submittal of a revised landscape plan prior to Council review which shall be subject to review and approval by Staff. -980- The applicant and/or designated representative shall be responsible for all required permitting activities All use, development, construction and operation requirements and standards of the Mound City Code shall apply to and regulate the property in all respects. Additional comments from the Planning Commission, City Council and Staff. -981 - XcelEnergy anuary 6, 2004 City of Mound Planning and zoning Office 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-1993 IN RE: Conditional Use Permit Application and Variance Application Dear City of Mound: This transmittal letter is to formally apply for a conditional use permit and variance application from the City of Mound for the proposed future expansion of the Mound Substation. Per the Exchange Agreement dated December 19, 2003 between the City of Mound and NSP it states that the City of Mound and NSP will cooperate and join with one another in any and all actions, petitions, and documents which are usual and necessary to accomplish the development of the property. Attached are the conditional use permit, variance application, labels, design narrative, and necessary drawings. Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy makes this application in cooperation with the City's statutory zoning authority which allows for review of this facility in order to meet reasonable zoning requirements. However, by this application, .Xcel Energy does not waive or subordinate its right to develop and construct the , proposed transmission line project pursuant to its eminent domain authority. If you have questions about the enclosed applications and materials, please contact Scott Johnson, Senior Right of Way Agent, at 612-330-6078. · Sincerely, Scott Johnson Siting and Land Rights 612-330-6078 RECEIVEr' JAN 6 2004 iVlUUND t'LANI~III~ItJ & INSk H:l WORD,Conditional Uselconditional use letter cify of mound, doc -982- DESIGN NARRATIVE FCEIYED 8 21104 XCEL ENERGY PLiIi I tI (; PROPOSED MOUND SUBSTATION EXPANSION 12/1/03 APB INTRODUCTION The Xcel Energy Mound Substation is located on Lots 29, 30, and 31, Koehler's Addition to Mound. Xcel Energy also currently owns Lot 32 and a portion of Lot 33, located adjacent to the west side of the substation. This property was originally purchased to allow for future expansion of the substation. However, it has been determined that Lots 32 and 33 are needed to facilitate the construction of a storm water pond associated with the realignment of County Road 15 within the City of Mound. Lots 27 and 28, located adjacent to the east side of the substation, have been offered to Xcel Energy by the City in return for Lots 32 and 33. As part of this land exchange Xcel Energy intends to apply for a Conditional Use Permit for the future expansion of the substation. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site Location - The Mound Substation is located on the south side of Lynwood Blvd, approximately 65 feet east of Belmont Lane. The substation is currently supplied by two 69kV transmission lines, has two 69-12.5kV transformers, and four 12.5kV feeders. The substation proper is contained in a fenced area of approximately 15,000 square feet or approximately 0.35 acres. Substation Details - The plan for the expansion of the substation will allow for the upgrade of the existing transmission lines from 69 kV to 115 kV. This will require replacement of the existing transmission structures within the substation. Subsequently it will also allow for upgrading the existing transformers from 69 kV to 115 kV. In addition, the plan will also allow for additional distribution feeder capacity. This will require the replacement of the existing 12.5 kV distribution structures. The replacement 115 kV and 12.5 kV structures will both be of an outdoor design. The 115 kV yard will consist of two galvanized steel box structures used to support aluminum bus work. These will be similar to the existing 69 kV structures, although somewhat larger. The existing 69 kV structures are 24 feet square by 33 feet high and include lightning shield extensions that are 30 feet in height (total structure height is 63 feet). The 69kV structures will be removed as part of the future expansion. The new 115 kV structures will be 34 feet square by 46 feet high and will include lightning shield extensions that are 35 feet in height (total structure height is 81 feet).The major equipment in the 115kV yard will include circuit breakers, disconnect switches, and instrument transformers. Similarly the 12.5 kV yard will also consist of aluminum bus work supported by galvanized steel structures, circuit breakers, disconnect switches and cable terminations. The existing 12.5 kV structures will be removed as part of the future expansion. Between the 115 and 12.5 kV yards there will be two power transformers. These devices change the 115 kV transmission voltage to 12.5 kV, the level needed for distribution to the transformers that serve the customers. The controls for the substation will be housed in a new control building located in the southeast comer p:kPROJ'CtCTIVEkPassportSubs\Sub j_RWIND\10379144'aM gmtWIND_Narriative.doc 1 -983- C of the substation. The control building will be 24 feet wide and 32 feet long. This will be a metal frame building with decorative concrete panels mounted on the exterior. The existing control house will be removed as part of the expansion. Grading - The expanded fenced area will be approximately 40,000 square feet or approximately 0.9 acres. Grading of the site will consist of several steps. Lots 27 and 28 are currently approximately 6 feet in height above the elevation of the existing substation yard. This excess material will be excavated and hauled off site down to an elevation that matches the existing substation. The grade will be sloped along the east side of Lot 27 to match that of Lot 26. A retaining wall approximately 100 feet in length will be installed along the north side of Lots 27 and 28 adjacent to the sidewalk along Lynwood Blvd. This will allow for the elevation change mentioned above. The wall will be constructed of Keystone blocks and will be approximately 3 feet in height. Since this wall will be located adjacent to the existing sidewalk a railing is required to be installed in the area where the wall exceeds 30 inches in height. The railing will be approximately 60 feet in length and will be fabricated of steel. Drainage - The substation is currently designed to drain from north to south in a sheet-flow fashion across the fenced area. The existing drainage ditch located along the south boundary of the substation property captures and convey the water to the existing storm system. The expanded substation will also use this method of drainage. As does the existing substation yard, the expanded yard will be surfaced with porous sand followed by aggregate base. The yard will be topped with four inches of crushed rock. Based on review of the existing topography of the site and the proposed grading plan post-development runoff should not exceed pre-development runoff. No ponding for reducing the runoff rate of storm water is proposed. Erosion and Sedimentation Control - The primary method of preventing sediments from leaving the site will be a silt fence at the site perimeter. Permanent surfacing, landscaping and turf will be installed as soon as practicable. Mulch will be used on seeded areas to prevent erosion while the turf is established. Silt fence and other protections will remain in place until the surfaces are finished. Fencing/Landscaping - As with the existing substation, the expanded yard will be enclosed by chain link fence with screening provided by landscaping. The chain link fence will be eight feet tall and will be comprised of a galvanized steel mesh fabric that is seven feet high and topped with three strands of barbed wire extending the fence height an additional foot. The barbed wire is needed as a deterrent to discourage intruders from scaling the fence and gaining access to the subStation. Landscaping along Lynwood Blvd presents a challenge due the lack of physical space between the existing sidewalk and substation fence. This area will feature Arborvitae and Potelia plantings to provide screening of the fence. The east side of the substation will feature Colorado Blue Spruce, Marshall's Seedless Ash, and Hedge Cotoneaster plantings to provide visual screening. The south side of the substation will not be landscaped due to lack of space for plantings. However, this side of the substation is currently screened by the existing railroad. In addition, the west side of the substation will not be landscaped. However, screening of this side of the substation will be provided by landscaping which will be installed along the east side of Lot 32 as part of the storm pond construction mentioned above. Site Access/Traffic - The entrance to the substation will remain through the existing gate located on the northwest side of the substation on Lynwood Blvd. Traffic in and out of the substation will normally be limited to one or two vehicles per week. P:hUROJL~CTWE~assportSubs\Sub J-R~MND\10379144hMgmtLMND_Nartiative.doc -984- Station Lighting - The station will be include lighting to allow for routine operation of the substation equipment as well as emergency work. However this lighting will be normally turned off. PROJECT SCHEDULE The application for a Conditional Use Permit is being made for the furore expansion of the substation as described above. The only actual work that will be completed at this time includes grading, fencing, and landscaping, which will be completed during the summer of 2004. VARIANCES It is understood that variances will be required for the steel structure and security fence heights. The height of the proposed steel structures is 46 feet with extensions to 81 feet, which are required for adequate protection of substation equipment from lightning. The maximum allowed height per City code is 35 feet. The security fence design is based on the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC), which requires a minimum of height of 7 feet. The maximum allowed height per City code is 6 feet. SUBMITTALS 1. CLIP Application 2. Variance Application 3. Design Narrative 4. Location Plan 5. Landscape Layout Plan 6. Landscape Elevations 1 of 2 7. Landscape Elevations 2 of 2 8. Topography Layout and Removal 9. Grading Layout 1 of 2 10. Grading Layout 2 of 2 Includes 1 reproducible set and 4 full size sets of items 4-10. p:kPROJXACTIVEkPassportSubs\Sub J-RWIND\10379144WlgmthMND_Narriative.doc -985- CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN..¢5364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION PAID JAN - 6 ?_004 2003 Conditional Use Permit Fee~~scrow Deposit c1'~¥ OF MOUND CITY C CITY COUNCIL DATE: ~ ~lV3 C.~3 c[ Distribution: C'l C City Planner: .~' Public Works: City Engineer:. ~ Parks: ~ Fire Dept._'~ Other:... ~ /[)~'"t ¢, I J'~f ~'0 i Please type or )rint the followin~ informatio PROPERTY Subject Address ~'~'-~ ( ~~/' INFORMATION Name of Busines. /~J,/:jJ4,,.4 ~e~t..r ¢ ~ DESCRIPTION ~ z ~ Block.. Plat APPLICANT The applicant is: Owner ~ Other: E'-MailAddress ¢~0~.~ ; k~%~~ ',[ , [tZ- 5-7~ ?IT/ ~~ , ~1~,¢ .6~ Fax Name OWNER (if other than Address applicant) Phone (H) ~(W). .(M)_ ARCHITECT, Name~¢( ~¢ ( ~~ %~¢J SURVEYOR, Address OR ENGINEER Phone (HL .~)~ ~D- ~ Z ~ ZONING Circle: R-1 R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 DISTRICT Conditional Use Permi't Application 12/30/02) Page 1 of 2 -986- MOUND p, A~/~¢a,_ o Description of Proposed Use: EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the;~r~P~Sed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parkingi. ~nS::describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the ! If applicable, a development'schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project: $ ~JFO,, ~¢_~ O Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ~ no. If yea, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by al._]l owners of the subject property, or an explanation given why this is not the case. Print Applicant's Name "' Applicc~Signature Date Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date City Code Section 350:525 relating to Conditional Use Permits must be reviewed by the applicant. I¢/ applying for a two family dwelling, City Code Section 350:630, Subd. 4. must be reviewed by the applicant. Conditional Use Permit Application (12/30/02) Page 2 of 2 -987- C CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472.0620 ~ 2003 Application Fee:~ Planning Commission Date PAID VARIANCE APPLICATION - CI1'¥ OF MOUND Escrow Deposit $50~--~.) Case No. City Council Date Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address ~ 4-1 I L,/~.o~ ~/v,/ _ PROPERTY Lot 'Z.~ ?-.~ 'z.c~ '~D %( Block LEGAL J ~ ZONING DISTRICT R-1 R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 OWNER Phone (H) __(W) ~iZ- '~'%O - 6~b-7¢ (M)__ APPLICANT Name (IF OTHER Address THAN OWNER) Phone (H). (W) ~(M) 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedur( for this property? Yes ( ) No (' ') yes, · : ~ . If list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): JAN 6 ?0% Variance Application (12/30/02) Page 1 of 3 -988- Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback re'gulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (')~). If. no, specify each non-cO"i~forming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): ,;...f,.,_.t SET..~BACKS: REQU IRED REQUESTED (or existing) . VARIANCE Front Yard: Side Yard: Side Yard: Rear Yard: Lakeside: (NSEW) (NSEW) (N S E W ),'"-' (NSEW) (NSEW) : (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: ft. ft. ft. ft. ft' ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft' ft' ft. ft' ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. .sq ft .sq ft . .sq ft sq ft sq ft .sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ~/,:.), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) too small ( ) too shallow Please describe: _'"~o'? o¢ ( ) topography ( ) drainage ( ) shape soil ( ) existing situation other: specify Vadance Application (12'/30/02) Page 2 of 3 -989- Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No,~. If yes, explain: 7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? (), No (/Vk.). If yes, explain: Yes 8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (), No ¢'~). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owne~:'s Signature C ' Date Applicant's Signature Date Variance Application (12/30102) Page 3 of 3 -990- MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 28, 2004 TO: SARAH SMITH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FROM: JOHN CAMERON, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: EXCEL ENERGY C.U.P. AND VARIANCE APPLICATION CASE NO. 04-01 AND 04-02 MFRA File No. 14674 As requested, we have reviewed the subject application and have no comments that relate to Engineering issues on the CUP and Variance request. However, we do want to remind Staff and the Applicant that the following information must be submitted before a grading permit can be issued: '1. A Stormwater Management Permit Application must be submitted that meets the City's SWMP requirements. AmOng other items, the application must include stormwater runoff calculations that show pre and post development flows and erosion control measures. The delineated wetland along the south edge of the property must be shown on the plans and the impact the proposed grading will have on this wetland, lfthe impact is minor and the proposed grading is within the 400 square foot de minimis that allows some fill in a wetland, then the grading plan could be approved. This information must be provided for review as part of the grading permit application. CC: Carlton Moore, .Public Works Director 15050 23RD AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 -991 - j~AMERON@MFRA.COM (763)476-6010 FAX (763) 476-8532 C MEMORANDUM Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: January 29, 2004 SUBJECT: CUP/Variance Application(s) - Xcel Substation Expansion Project C~ C I have reviewed the application and plans for the Xcel substation proposal and offer the following comments: · The substation is an essential service building/structure and is not subject to lot area, lot width, coverage or setback requirements. · Height variance can be legitirnized based on needs to provide essential services for the good of the community Structure would be the same height regardless of its location. · The residential neighborhood to the north will be impacted by the increased site size and added equipment on site. · Primary item of concern is north, west, and east edges of the site. The railroad should act as a ground level screen to Shoreline Blvd. Treatment of landscape and screening needs more attention and should address the entire site not just the expanded area. Screening and buffering approach proposed by Xcel is minimal. · If possible, it is strongly suggested that the fence along Lynwood be pulled south to allow for more planting area. Currently, the plans show about a 9 feet wide landscape strip between the sidewalk and fence. An additional 5 feet would help greatly. · I would recommend two approaches and/or combination of the two to address the landscaping and screening issues: A chain link fence would only be acceptable ifa continuous planting edge can be provided along the north, west, and east perimeter. The use of Arborvitae is acceptable but only in limited numbers and definitely shouldn't be the predominant screening plant material. It is suggested that other types of conifers and deciduous be included in the plan for variety. Use of an alternate fencing material as chain link gives too many industrial connotations and does not fit with the character of the area. Minimally, a colored chain link fence in a dark color would be more appropriate than galvanized steel. -., North 'l"hird Street, Suite 100, Minneapc~lis, Minnesot~ 55401 (612) 338-0800 t"ax (612) o-~8-6808 -992- z cD z ~ z~ >- I- Z Z ~=.~.., O~ Z Z C:~l~ >-Z (DO~- Z I~n'~-~ ,-~ 0 ~ Z ~0 UJ~ :X:: ::~ ~ ~ ZZ ~ oN Z I~ On' ~:Z C) }-- 0 h- Z · IJJ z I- (D X o (..9 z c~ Z ~ Z (/)J z Z o o X imm 993- X XN. LLO~ m~ ! z ~- o z ,w o uJ C) Z Z o Z ~. 0 0 0 CD ._~ -994- ~URCH ''(96) ~o (89)' IO0 o r.zlO0o '~ ! 2%o'"' ,oot o '~ 22 ~ (95) .= (~F'~ 211OOo 100 14 :~ I~ ~00o I00 16 ~,~(9~)~oo' ~oo (92)~' RD e 112.5 (173) (94) 3301 - - r."'l - .o LYNWOOD ~o BLVD~OC ~o 3,62.5 t 36 1751 37 <.. O-'3° 46'30' ~2" I I. I I I I I" I I I I I ( 35 (6g) 25 3172 (QCD 5-31-63) (UND£V) 282.5 276.6 514.2 -O~3C NO . , ooc .o (75) j (74) (62} 50S.5 /S-97,5- PART I. £LECi'RIC SUPPLY STATIONS I IOB4 C C Section 11. Protective Arrangements in Electric Supply Stations 110. Gineral Requirements A, Enclosure of Equipment 1. Type~ of Enclosures Rooms and spaces ir~ which electric .~upply conductors or equipment 'are installed shall be so ar- ranged with fences, screens, partitions, or walls to forte an enclosure as to limit the likelihood of entrance of unautI~odzed persons or intcrference by them with equipment inside. Et~trances not under observation of an authorized attendant shall be kept locked. A safety sign shall be displayed at each entrances. For fenced electric supply stations, a safety sign shall be displayed on each side. NOTE: ANSI Z535.1.1991, ANSI 7.535,2-1991, ANSI Z525,3-~991, ANSI Z535.4-1991, and ANSI Z535,5-1991 conlain Jrff0rmaliOn re£ardh~g 5afe~y signs. Mctel fences, when used to enclose electric supply statiol)s having enzrgized electric conduc- tors or equipment, shall have a height not less than 2.13 rn (7 ft) overal[ and shall be grounded m accordance w/t~ Section 9. The requirements for fence height may be satisfied with any one of the following: a, Fence fabric, 2.13 m (7 it) or more in height. b. A combJnalion of 1,80 m (6 ft) or more of fcncc fabric and a 300 mm (1 fi) extension utilizing Ihrt:c or more strands of barbed wire. c. O~hcr typc.s of constraction, such as nonmetallic material, that present equivalent ban'iers to climbing or other unauthorized entry. 2, Safety ClearaltceZor~e l:'e~lces or walls, when installed a.~ barriers for unauthorized pcrsonneI, shall bc located such that exposed llve parts are o~tside the safety clearance zone as Jlluarated in Figure I I0-1 and shown in Table 110-1. EXCEPTION l: Where a fence, partition, or wall with no openings through which sticks or olhcr objects can be insorlecl is i,Lilized, live parts complying with the requiremer~ts of' this code may be installed within the safety clearance zone if they are below the lm,'izontal llne projected fi'0rO th,e, top of the fence or wall. EXCEPTJ'ON 2.. Thc safety clearance zone requirement is not applicable tB Internal fences within an electric mpply station perimeter fence. B, Rooms and Spaces All rooms and ~paces in which elecu'ic supply equipment is installed shall comply with the following requircrncnts: 1. Construction They shall be as much as practical noncombustible. 2. Use They should be as much as practical free from combustJble materials, dust, and fumes and shall not be used for manufacturing or for storage, except for minor parts essential to the mab~tenance of the installed equipment~ (For battery area_q, see Section 14; for auxiliary cquiprnent in classified locations, s~ Rule t27.) 3. Ventilation There ~hould be ~ufficicnt ventilation to malntajn opera,ns temperatures within ratings, arranged 1o mbfimize accumulaJon of airborne contaminants under any operating conditions. 4. Moisture and Weather They should be dry. In outdoor stations or stations in wct tunnels, subways or other moist or high- humidity locations, the equipment shall be suitably designed lo withstand the prevailing atmo- spheric conditions. "lCd -996- W W ~--- ~-U Z ~ 0 0 ..U oo ~ ~:~ ZZZ ~ W WW W ~ SSd laJ ~~ II 'N ,;,,, ,ri~ [,,.. ,/v ,,-q£,Zgo¢O ,¢'" ~/'o~/ ££ . Caa./ P ZI ~so_7 aW .,/o au.// ~sa/14- >_~--- .gnououdp2/q Mo az~po ,~u./C,~,/x~ __j_.. / -997- C 3S~gOH 90BIN03 -998- -999- ~ - 1000 ~ -1001 .m .mi z.<cE)-- '~ - 1002- 1003- ,~ C C -1004- ff 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 5, 2004 SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Review of Text Amendments to City Code Relating to Temporary Membrane Structures - Request to Table to 4~27 Council Meeting APPLICANT: City of Mound PUBLIC HEARING The public hearing for review of the proposed amendments to the City Code to regulate temporary membrane structures (ie. hoop houses) is scheduled to be held at the April 13, 2004 City Council meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully requests that the public hearing be tabled to the April 27, 2005 meeting so as to undertake some additional research regarding the UBC and its applicability to these types of structures. - 1005- C MEMORANDUM Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: April 8, 2004 SUBJECT: PC Case #04-03 4520 Denbigh Road - Variance - Tim Olson Included in your packets is a narrative from the applicant, Tim Olson. His information packet contains a revised front yard setback for the proposed home and attached garage project. Previously indicated in the application and Planning Report was a 10.3 feet front yard setback. The applicant has modified that setback to approximately 12.8 feet for Council consideration. A number of area photos of existing garages are provided by the applicant to support the revised plan. Planning Commission deliberated for quite some time over the front yard setback issues, eventually recommending denial of the application on the basis that the lot was overbuilt and other opportunities for storage were accommodated with the lower level garage. Staff recommendation was to approve the OHW and front yard setback variances and deny the hardcover. This recommendation acknowledges that the house plan would likely change unless a hardcover reduction could be accommodated through other means such as pervious driveway surfacing. Given the negative recommendation from the Planning Commission and split recommendation from Staff, a resolution has not been prepared. Staff.would suggest any of the following options are appropriate: 1. Remand the revised plan back to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. 2. Determine if the revisions proposed by the applicant address those issues identified by the Planning Commission and Staff and make a motion for approval. The application was deemed complete on February 13, 2004 so time is available for additional review as the City executed its 60-day extension on April 9, 2004. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 - 1006- MEETING MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 15, 2004 DRAFT I NOT APRROVED BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #04-03 VARIANCE 4520 DENBIGH ROAD TIM OLSON / LISA WALLACE Gordon indicated the property was part of minor subdivision in 2001. As a result, the property lost its lot of record status, which limits hardcover to 30 percent. Gordon went over the plans. Plans include a side loaded garage and a deck on the lakeside of the house that runs the full length of the house. The 2001 subdivision created 2 lots from 3. Bluff condition was previously addressed during recent subdivision and therefore does not need to be readdressed. House appears 4-levels but meets the 35 foot height requirements. The garage design is an appropriate way to get vehicles off the road. Some of the houses might have the same setback but usually can't get a car parked without the vehicle hanging out in the street. Denbigh Road is a no parking street. Hardcover calculations do not include the bottom portion of the deck however we are unclear about the surface therefore we assume it is soft. If it's hard it creates more hardcover. We have reviewed the plans with regard to grading. Detailed review will be done at time the building permit comes in. One remaining item included in the minor subdivision included the payment of park dedication fees. The minor subdivision indicated that they would be paid at the time of building permit issuance. Therefore, Staff will need to go back and check to make sure they were paid and/or not paid. Staff has no objections to the plan. Comments are included on page 2 of the Planning Report. Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the front and lakeside variance due to the parking issues and width of Denbigh and that the lakeshore variance is deficient only only (7) feet. Hardcover issue should.be restricted to the 30 percent requirement. It is suggested that an alternate paver design that provides permeability and reduced driveway width could be reasonable alternatives to minimize hardcover - 1007- C Chair Michael questioned the size of the deck and asked about the typical rule of thumb for deck width being 13 feet. If the 3-car garage was to be reduced to a 2-car only 240 SF would be reduced however a front variance would still be necessary. Miller asked what alternatives could work for driveway. Gordon replied that there are pavers that include specific design with set areas where water can pass through. Often sub grade materials have to include certain types of soils. Ayaz was concerned about the conversion of decks to 3-season porches. Hardcover is a concern. He feels that cutting back the garage from 3 car to 2 car with a front load may be an option. Michael recalled that he went along with the minor subdivision in 2001 as no variances were requested, including setbacks and hardcover. He indicated that the size of the deck concerns him a bit. Tim Olson introduced himself and stated that they have been working on the plans since September. He said he is willing to do the pavers but expressed his desire to do the larger garage because he has 3 vehicles. The garage would provide all season storage. He indicated that minimizing the 3-car to the 2-car reduces the upper floor living space. He also indicated that they would like to have the 13-foot width to accommodate living space. Ten feet gets tight when a table and chairs are set on the deck. The "under deck space" will be soft. Michael indicated that the biggest problem he has is hardcover - new lots created in 2001 stated no variances would be needed. He also has a problem with a 3~car garage. Ayaz also has a problem with the garage size. The deck width is OK but it could be minimized. Osmek doesn't have a problem with the deck as proposed. Under deck is soft, therefore, the deck doesn't create more hardcover. He can go along with the front setback. Michael questioned "comprehensive remodel" vs. "new" - what is the difference? Gordon talked about the details associated with the project. This plan uses the existing foundations. It is similar to Jones Lane remodel in that pieces of the house are being reused. Tim Olson introduced his designer. He indicated that they are taking the roof off, adding new trusses, with a garage addition on the front side and utilizing existing basement and crawlspace. A lot of the existing walls will be kept but updated. Upper floor on top of garage will be used for upper floor living space including a possible mother-in-law suite. - 1008- Gordon indicated that 8-ft front and 4-ft side setbacks are allowed for detached structures. Ayaz asked if the lakeside wall would remain. The owner confirmed that it would. MOTION by Osmek, second by Ayaz to recommended approval of the deck variance. MOTION carried. Voting for: Schwingler, Osmek and Miller. Voting against: Ayaz and Michael. Osmek said he knows that the applicant wants to make reasonable use of their property, however, this lot cannot accommodate this much house. He indicated that he has no problem denying the hardcover as applicant can use pavers. He is concerned about "overbuilding" the house. He suggested redesigning the garage to be front-loaded which could maybe accommodate 3 cars. Ayaz suggested 2 % car garage using side loaded design. Ayaz believes the garage part simply needs to be modified. Areas of the house could be shifted around and could also impact the "appearance" of the size of the house. Smith indicated that meeting dates will still be the same if applicant decides to table until April 5th meeting. It would still accommodate an April 13th Council review. Gordon reminded the Commission that the lakeside motion has already been voted on. Michael indicated that he believes that the whole case should come back. Osmek doesn't think it's fair that the vote could be pulled back on the lakeside deck. MOTION by Osmek to reconsider the previous vote. MOTION fails for lack of a second. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Ayaz to deny the hardcover request including findings included in Staff Report. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Ayaz to deny the front setback variance. MOTION carried unanimously. - 1009- C We have looked at many configurations and find a side loaded garage works best for the following reasons: 1) There is no on street parking available on Denbigh, a side loaded garage would accommodate more off street parking. 2) It would accommodate parking in the driveway without rear of the car hanging in the street. 3) Allow occupants of the parked vehicles to exit & unload any items without being in the street. 4) Because Denbigh is such a narrow street, a side-loaded garage would allow more reom to safely exit the driveway. 5) It would be more aesthetically pleasing to the neighborhood. A three car garage is needed for the following reasons: 1) Provide seasonal storage for all vehicles. 2) Provide secudty for all vehicles. (I have had 3 incidences of theft since I moved in last May. The most recent was on or about Mamh 31,2004) 3) Provide minimal living space for us while 2nd sto~ addition is completed to existing structure. 4) Provide minimal living space for my parents after construction is completed. 5) Provide space for many tools & equipment needed for projects I complete myself. After doing some homework, I found that there are residences on Denbigh that have front-loaded garages as close as 10' to the curb (see photo 1) and side-loaded garages 7' to the curb (see photo 2). This much less than the 15+' to curb I am requesting. There is a neighboring detached garage, which is virtually the same size as what is requested, and is at minimum setbacks. (see photos 3a, 3b). According to city guidelines, a detached garage would be allowed with an 8' front yard set back and a 4' side yard set back. This would allow a larger garage than requested, but I feel it would be an encroachment to the abutting neighbors. Following recommendations received during several meetings with city staff and the planning commission meeting, we have reduced the size of the garage to a minimum usable size. I have reviewed the plans with the abutting neighbors and they have all given their approval. -1010- ~#S; denb~Mh (~ODx~;OOx~qb ~pmg) -1011- qS&O denb~gh (~OOx~OOxeqb ~peg) -1012- -1013- C C -1014- II II II II II II II II II II II I I I I I I I.I I I II I I I -1015- C C -1016- I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II F'I -t I -------I I LJ II II II II I II II I ,I _k ............ I I -1017- C I I / I I / I /// / / / I / -1018- -1019- C'l - 1020- LAT I+ 'o,¢"'/.> '~, .. ¢4,%4,F,.,~, ooq .0,.,, N. E ..D.....!':~ ...... 59,67 ...... S T R A T F ~'"R...D ROAD I I I 30.8 8" VCT SANITARY SEWER PLANNING REPORT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: March 11, 2004 SUBJECT: Variance Request APPLICANT: Tim Olson and Lisa Wallace CASE NUMBERS: 04-03 HKG FILE NUMBER: 04-05 LOCATION: 4520 Denbigh Road ZONING: R- 1A Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential C C BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION: The applicant has submitted an application for front, rear yard (lakeside) and hardcover, variances to construct a garage addition and undertake a comprehensive remodel of the existing house at 4520 Denbigh Lane. The associated variances are identified as follows: Proposed Required Variance Front yard 20 feet 10.3 feet 9.7 feet Rear yard (lakeside) 43 feet 50 feet 7 feet Hardsurface coverage 3011 sq. fi. 2685 sq. f~ (max.) 326 sq. fi. The property was recently subdivided through the reoriented the parcel boundaries of Lots 1, 2 and 3. property as a non-lot of record for zoning purposes. approval of Resolution #01-31 which This subdivision approval qualifies the The proposed house remodel project has four levels designed to integrate with the sloping site conditions. The majority of the house fits within a 30'x 48' pad. A 24' x 31 ½' attached garage has living space above it as well. The 3-stall garage utilizes a side entry drive. The street side garage wall has the proposed 10.3 foot front yard setback. A 2-level lakeside deck (13' x 36') is proposed on the channel side of the home. 123 North Third Street, Suite I00, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 - 1022- p. 2 4520 Denbigh Road- Variance March 11, 2004 CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS: Streets: No objections. Refer to comments from Public Works and City Engineer. Parks Director: No objections. Building Official: An inspection of the existing structure for compliance with building code requirement(s) will be required if applicant desires to occupy garage addition during remodel process of existing structure. Applicant is advised that approval is not granted or authorized as part of this application. Police Chief: No objections. City Engineer: I have reviewed the revised survey and do not see any engineering issues that pertain to the variance request on this property. There are a couple of things that may need to be worked out when and if the building permit is issued, such as: Some clarification on the proposed retaining wall heights. · The existing utility services are located in the driveway. PUBLIC AGENCY: A copy of the variance application was forwarded to the DNR Area Hydrologist for review. As of this writing. No comments were received. REVIEW PROCEDURE: City Code Section 350:530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his or her land. 60-DAY PROCESS: Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. The variance application was deemed to be complete on February 13, 2004 and the 60-day timeline will expire on or around April 16, 2004. Within the 60-day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much additional time is needed. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 - 1023- C p. 3 4520 Denbigh Road- Variance March 11, 2004 NOTIFICATION: City policy requires that abutting property owners are notified of variance requests by mailed notice. DISCUSSION: Staff has worked with the applicant on a number of issues with the application. The proposal addresses a number of initial staff concerns including drainage, removal of a 3-season porch and garage location, and design. The following discussion points are offered for consideration in making a recommendation. 1. The property was created through approval of a minor subdivision as set forth in Resolution #01-31. 2. Resolution # 01-31 addresses the pre-existing bluff condition. There is no need to readdress it through this application. 3. Although the proposed plans show a 4-story design, the house does meet the 35-foot height maximum. 4. A side entry garage provides a better approach to providing off-street parking than a front entry that would not accommodate parking in the driveway. 5. The existing house has a 56 feet OHW setback. The proposed house would maintain the existing house setback but add a lakeside deck. Hardsurface coverage exceeds the maximum allowed (30% of lot area or 2685 sq. fi.) by 326 sq. t~. It is unclear if the bottom level deck/patio would be future hardsurface. This area does not appear to be included in the hardsurface calculations. 7. A number of retaining walls are proposed to address grade transitions and drainage. o If approved, Staff will need to review City records for payment of park, street unit, sanitary sewer, and watermain unit fees/charges associated with approval of the previous subdivision approval to verify they were not previously paid. The resolution states that these fees were to be paid at the time of building permit fees so it is likely that they have not been collected. C~ 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 - 1024- p. 4 4520 Denbigh Road- Variance March 11, 2004 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend the Council approve of the OHW variance and deny the hardcover variance with the following conditions: 1. The City Engineer review grading and drainage issues at the time of building permit. 2. The applicant shall be responsible for the payment of all costs associated with the variance request. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all necessary building permits. 4. Payment of park dedication fees of $1100 at the time of building permit in the event they were not previously collected with the approval of Resolution # 01-31. $. One street unit charge in the amount of $1,170.90 shall be paid in the event they were not previously collected with the approval of Resolution # 01-31. 6. Any deficient sanitary sewer or watermain unit charges should be collected. Staff offers the following findings in support of the OHW and front yard setback variance request: 1. The side entry garage addresses parking concerns present along Denbigh Road. 2. A 20 feet setback would push the house further down the slope of the property which could cause a difficult transition ~rom the street to garage. 3. The lakeside setback variance in minimal in distance and the deck structure adds minimal structure bulk which could interfere with lakeside sightlines. 4. The lakeside deck has a reasonable depth to allow use and enjoyment of the property and surrounding lakeshore environment. Staff offers the following findings in support of a denial recommendation of the hardcover variance request: 1. The proposed home improvements are being created by the applicant and do not represent a pre-existing condition. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -1025- C p. 5 4520 Denbigh Road- Variance March 11, 2004 o The approval of Resolution #01-31 anticipated hardcover conformance with the 30% non- lot of record maximum. There are alternatives available to reduce the amount of hardcover and allow home construction that affords the property owners reasonable use of their residential property. C 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 - 1026- . RECEIVED, JAN15 VARIANCE aOU" & SP'APPLICATION ~341~ Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952.472-0620 PAID JAN I 5 Z.O04 cITY OF MOUND Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application~ Planning Commission Date Case No. City Council Date Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address ~"-',~'~ ~-J~'.'"~ LEGAL DESC. Subdivision PID~ /~'-//~- ~2-~- ~/~0 Plat~ ~-1~ R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 ZONING DISTRICT R-1 PROPER~ Name~ APPLICANT Name (IF OTHER Address THAN OWNER) Phone (H) (W), Fax 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, vanance, conditional use permit, or zoning r ~re for this property? Yes ( ) No (~f). 'If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Variance Application Page 1 of 3 Detailed description of proposed Construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): - 1027- Case No. (~) ~- ~..~ 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations forthe zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE Front Yard: ( N~E W ) ,¢~ ~ ft. Side Yard: ( N S ~)vV ) /43 ft. Side Yard: ( N $ E ~ /0 ft. Rear Yard: ('N S E W ) ft. Lakeside: (~S E W ) ~ ft. ' (NSEW) ft. (or existing) /o,2 ft. ft. ?,7 ft. ft. ft. ff. ,,~ ff. ff. ft. Street Frontage: ft. ~__~ ft. ft. Lot Size: sq ff oc~'~~L~2 sq ff _sq ff Hardcover: ~,~'5-' sqff ~.~O// sqft ~'"X"c~,(.O__sqft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (), No (,X~). If no, specify each non-conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reaSonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) too small ( ) too shallow Please describe: (~topography ( ) soil ( ) drainage (;X). existing situation ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Variance Application Page 2 of 3 -1028- o,,,o. 6. Was the hardship deScribed above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ~', No (). If yes, explain: 7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (), No (~). If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (), No (,~. If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature P'-"~ (~'-~ ' Oate/~~//'~'7/' Applicant's Signature Variance Application Page 3 of 3 - 1029- Date GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. SURVEYING, ENGINEERING AND LAND PLANNING 445 N. WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA 55356 952-473-4 ! 41 FAX: 9~2-473-4435 February l3,2004 Tim Olson 4520 Denbigh Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Tim: On your proposed house, we have determined the following roof elevations. In the area of the proposed garage the average ground elevation is 960.0 feet; the proposed roof height is 25.75 feet above the proposed 965.9 garage floor elevation or 991.65 feet for a height of 31.65 feet. For the roof on the second floor addition to the existing home the average ground elevation is 949.5 feet. The proposed roof height is 34.67 feet above the 943.0 ground elevation or 977.67 feet for a height of 28.17 feet. Sincerely, Gronberg & Associates, Inc. Mark S. Gronberg, P.E. & L.S. C - 1030- FEB 13 ZOO4 MOUND PLAN[Vtfv IN6'r CITY OF MOUND HARDCOVER CALCULA. TIONS (!M. PERVIOLCS.'. SURFACE!.COVERAG'E) LOTAREA :~° SQ. FT. X30%= (for'all lots)·....`` .... , ............................. .. LOT AREA ~ ?5 o RECEIVED JAN ! 5 2004 LOTAREA ~?~'~ . "'S,G. FT. X40%'=(forhots ofReaord) ..,,';. ' ................. SQ. FT: X 15% = (for detached buildings,,..., only) ............ .... ..... ..,..../3q3 Existing Lots of Recd?d may.haqe 4d pe~en{ cov6~~ ~r0vi~le~ tH~t {~o~inique~i af~ dilli'~d, as o'utlid~d in Z0~nifig OrdinanCe Section 350:1225, Subd. 6,B.1 (see back)., A. plan must.be submitted and apwcve~ by the. BQIIdlng Official. LENGTH Wi~¥i~i' SQ FT DETACHED BUILDINGS (GARAGE/SHED) .TOTAL HOUSE .................................................... X = ~.'3' X = TOTAL dETACHED. 'I~'UiLDING~.:..'.i ..... '.' .... i .............. 232 ¢ DRIVEWAY? PARi~!NG AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC, "' ' "X'. " .". = ¢85 DECKS Open de'ci~'s.(.~/4",.ht]h':'" Opening between boards) with a per~tous surface under are not counted as hardcover. . . TOTAL DRI.VEWAY, E,..']'.,C ................... , ............. '...' ....... ,,...',.. X -' TOTAL DECK ................................... .... ..' " : TO?~,L i~¥H;~15,'. ................... ' ....................... TOTAL H~RDCOYERIIMPER¥1OUS SURFACE ................ ;. ' ........................ UNDER ~ (indicate difference) .................................................................... PREPARED BY DATE Revised 04/01/02 -1031 - C il C CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 01-31 RESOLUTIO!N TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDMSION AND VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4520 DENBIGH ROAD, LO.~ 1, 2., 3 AND THE NORTHWESTERLY ½ OF 4, BLOCK 2, AVALON PID #19-11%23-24-0006 AND #19-117-23-24-0007 P & Z CASE # 01-03 AND//01-10 WHEREAS, he applicant, Carl and Patrioia Palmquist, have requested a minor subdivision am/~ce to reJoe, a~ a property line between two adjacent parcels locatexi at 4520 Denbigh Road; and, ' WHEREAS, the subj.eot prope~y ~s l~d within the R-lA Zoning District that requires a 6,000 s~mu~re feet lot area, 20 f~et/rout yarcl sotbaeks, and 10 foot side yard so,backs for non lots of rocord; and, WIttgREAS, TmctA has approximatoly 8000 squ ~are foist and Tract B has approximately 10,500 square foot of lot area above the 9':31 foot oontour as proposed. Lot widths meet the district minimums at, 60 feet and 40 fe~t respe~voly; and, WIIE~, th~ .minor subdivision would rootassify the proposed parcels to nonqots of record, subj~&l, g them to att. applie.~le zoning provisions; and, WI-~AS~ tl~ propor~ is. dofin,d as a bluff by the Shoreland Management Ordinance whioh wou:Id.'~ a v~ to-allow a s/aglo ~,ly res.ici~ncc to be built on Tract B. b~Iding setbacks ~ ~ ,-,wty omat~,: panel, me~ zo '.ning setback ~.'~.mums for non,tots of roc, ord; and, WI~RE.AS.., tJao ha~. :deovo~ is undot ~0% for the c-xisting home. on Tract A and the proposod hOme.,oa. ~r.,~ lt; and, WHEREAS, the Blanning Commission has review~ the requost and recommended approval of, ~e .,minor subdivision mid vadm,e. ' NOW, THEREFOPdg, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as folto~vs: - 1032- P~lutlon No. 01-31 The City docs hereby grant a minor subdivision o£thc property,pursuant to Section 330:20, St~bdivision 1.B with thc fellewing conditions: a. Final grading, drainage and erosion control plan be approved by the City Eng4aoor at the time of buitding permit application. b. Provide-utility and drainage oasomonTM along all new lot lines, 5 feet wide on side 1~ lines, and 1~0 foot in. width along tl~ ~ont lot line. c. Tho .new sanitary sower and water services either be installed, or some type of financial .guarantee bo provided, such as CaSh escrow or performance bond. d. One street unit ohax$e in tho mount of $1,170.90 shall be paid. e. Any doficiom sanitary sower or v~termain unit charges should bo collected. f. Pa~k dedication fee of $500 b~ paid at the time of building permit issuance. ~ CiW does hereby grant a variance to allow building within a bluffbased on the following a. The neighborhood was platted prior to the enactment of 'a Shor¢land ~ent Ordinance. b. ~g of neighborhood for residential development nit, reA thc natural ¢~axaot~r of tho bluff. c; Similar circumstances exist for a la, ge p.crcontag¢ of the homes along ~ho north side of Donbi~h Road that ~r¢ also built on thc bluff. ds G-mating tho ~e would not detriment the purposes of this Ordinance. ~s Minor SubdiviSiOn and Variance is grameA for the following new legally described property: TRACT A: LOT 3. AI~D THE NORTHEASTERLY HALF OF LOT 4, BLOCK 2, AVALON, ~P-/N. CO~, MINNESOTA TRA' .CT B: LOTS 1 ~ 2~, BLOCK 2~ AVALON, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA q:ho ~ owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution and easements--with Heunopi,n Co~ty and. paying all- costs for such r~cording. The foregoing re~on' was moved bY Cou~ilmombor Brown, se~onded by Court. '~.~ammbor ldeyor. The fol~h~g~ CouueAt~rs v~ed in. tho affi~ve: Brown, Hanus, Moisel, Meyer Thc folb~g Coun~i!mcmbo~s voted in the negative: None. Adopted by thc City Council of tho City of Mound this 27~ day of March, 2001. Mayor, Pat. Mois~l - 1033- Planning Commission Minutes EXCERPTS I .... II March 12, 2001 MINOR SUBDIVISION CARL & PATRICIA PALMQUIST 4520 DENBIGH ROAD Gordon presented the applicant's request to divide their lot into 2 buildable lots that meet both lot area and width. The current layout shows a large lot with a triangular lot adjacent on the east side. Each lot is conforming to the zone R1A standards. The top of bluff as indicated is not correct; it is actually at the curbside. Staff has no objections to the subdivision plan. It is conforming in every respect to code. We do have this variance item that we need to recognize here and also update through the application materials on a variance request form. There is a discrepancy on the front setback that needs to be changed so the plan and survey agree. However, both figures are within the required 20 feet. John Cameron and Gordon have both recommended approval. Staff recommends approval of the applications with the following conditions: remove the bluff line from the survey, maintain a maximum of 30% hardcover, submit park dedication fees, and add drainage and utility easements to the plat. Discussior~ Burma inquired about the park dedication fees and how they are figured. Gordon indicated they would be whatever the City Council decides they will be. They have not come up with a standard. Gl' MOTION by Commissioner Burma, seconded by Commissioner Clapsaddle, to deny recommendation of this application. Burma stated that he was recommending denial because of the bluff issue. Michael questioned Gordon if this was something that a Planner would recommend? Gordon responded that he feels comfortable recommending approval. The one item we need to address is the bluff. The lots conform. It would be more troubling if it hadn't been previously platted and built on; if we were trying to protect the integrity of a natural bluff area. This neighborhood has a pre- existing condition that was compromised when the original neighborhood was established and the street was put in. He also thinks back to the Teal Point development regarding the lots with 40-50 percent slope. That was pre-shoreline management and the ordinance didn't have the backbone to deal with that at that time. As long as there is reasonable house size, we meet our hardcover and we are n~ t building a series of retaining walls to get the grading to work, it shouldn't be any problem. Michael felt is seemed conforming and reasonable. We are not creating undersized lots with hardcox er problems. Clapsaddle was concerned that we are forgetting the bluff ordinance and why it was created. Glister questioned the existence of a hardship. There is an existing house. From Gordon's perspective, because it has been platted previously, this is a neighborhood that the City doesn't want o go away just because we have a bluff. The issue is when should we be issuing variances? We can't t et away from the bluff issue because it is a shoreline issue. We are meeting lot area and width, it's not a - 1034- Planning Commission Minutes March 12, 2001 big issue to staff and we have every reason to find a hardship because it is a previously platted neighborhood. The bluff probably extended much further up originally and the road was cut into it. Burma clarified that a hardship is something pre-existing, not caused by the applicant's actions.'. Carl Palmquist, 4520 Denbigh Road, indicated that they had submitted a plan originally in 1989. They paid particular attention to lot size with respect to the ordinary high water level. Proposed and existing lots meet the 30% hardcover requirement. Lot area and setbacks are conforming. Drainage plans are on the plat. The variance is simply because the house is in the bluff zone. I believe in 1984 ii was subdivided or attempted. Everything conforms, except the bluff and that is what we are asking for. There also seems to be a difference in opinion on bluff definition. Gordon indicated, point by point, that it definitely was a bluff according to definition. MOTION was withdrawn by Commissioners Clapsaddle and Burma. Clapsaddle wanted to know, if we are conceding that this is a bluff, what construction steps and what procedures have been taken to insure it overcomes the problems associated with bluff construction. Gordon stated that we have not had a standard to apply to every case. Sometimes we use pylon footing constructions and sometimes poured footings. Clapsaddle felt that the proper construction techniques needed to be considered at the Planning Commission level. Gordon stated that generally good slope construction is to try to avoid digging into it. This application has a good plan. MOTION by Commissioner Clapsaddle, second by Commissioner Glister, to recommend approval of this application. Motion carried unanimously. _2001 PC MEETING SCHEDULE Mike Mueller, in a note to Chairman Michael, indicated that The Laker has still not determined whether to change their publication date. The issue will have to be addressed in the next Commission meeting. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Commissioner Weiland, seconded by Commissioner Clapsaddle, to adjourn the meeting at 9:08 PM. Motion carried unanimously. Cl~r~; f~[ichael A~est, Planning Secretary - 1035- - 1036- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04-.__ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR THE 2004 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of: Bayridge Road Halstead Lane Westwood Circle Beachwood Road Granger Lane Sinclair Road Priest Lane Aspen Road Hillcrest Road Diamond Lane Gumwood Road Langdon Lane Langdon Lane Lafayette Lane Jones Lane Baywood Shores Dr Baywood Lane Westedge BIvd West to End Bay Ridge Road to Bartlett Blvd Westedge BIvd to End Westedge Blvd to Rosewood Lane Beachwood Road North to End Westedge Blvd. to East End Ridgewood Road to South End Clover Circle East to End Sycamore Lane to Diamond Lane Hillcrest Road to Gumwood Road Diamond Lane to Langdon Lane Gumwood Road to Lynwood Bird Lynwood BIvd to South End Three Points BIvd to Jones Lane Three Points Blvd to Lafayette Lane Three Points Bird West to End Three Points BIvd to Baywood Shores Drive Bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Valley Paving, Inc., Shakopee Buffalo Bituminous, Inc., Buffalo GMH Asphalt Corp., Chaska Hardrives, Inc., Rogers Midwest Asphalt Corp., Hopkins $1,031,102.70 $1,066,871,50 $1,072,410.30 $1,119,592.90 $1,149,406.20 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Valley Paving of Shakopee, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota: The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Valley Paving of Shakopee, MN, in the name of the City of Mound for the 2004 Street Reconstruction Project, streets noted above, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of April, 2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel - 1037- Engineering · Planning ° Surveying April 8, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City of Mound 2004 Street Reconstruction Project MFRA #14615 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Enclosed is a tabulation of the five (5) bids received on April 7, 2004 for the 2004 Street Reconstruction Project. The bids ranged from a low of $1,031,102.70, submitted by Valley Paving, Inc. of Shakopee, to a high of $1,149,406.20. The Engineer's estimate was $1,179,564.00. Valley Paving is one of the older, reputable road contractors in the area and was the contractor for last year's project. We are recommending that a contract in the amount of $1,031,102.70 be awarded to Valley Paving, Inc. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:tlm s:~nainAtnou 14615XcorrespondenceXmayor-council 4-8 - 1038- 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-marl: mfra@mfra, com - 1039- n- l-- Z o I.tl rr I-- Z 0 d n- I- Z 0 r~ LU - 1042- Engineering · Planning · Surveying April 9, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Mound City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound CSAH 15/City MSA System MFRA #14673 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Enclosed is a resolution requesting revisions to the City's Municipal State Aid Street System. Mn/DOT requires that the City revoke the State Aid designation on those portions of Lynwood Boulevard and Belmont Lane that will be used by Hennepin County for the relocation of CSAH 15. This will free up 0.22 miles, which when added to the 0.27 miles we are presently under the maximum allowed, results in a new allowable mileage of 0.49 miles. We have reviewed the City' s State Aid Street system and are recommending that Manchester Road from Devon Lane to Tuxedo Boulevard be added to the system. The addition of Manchester Road will add 0.34 miles back into the City's MSA system. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth cc: Carlton Moore, Public Works Director, City of Mound s:~nain:Xmou 14673XcorrespondenceXraayor&coun¢il4-8 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 -' phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra.com - 1 043- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04- RESOLUTION REVOKING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS AND ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET WHEREAS, It appears to the City Council of the City of Mound that the streets hereinafter described as Lynwood Boulevard and Belmont Lane, should be revoked as Municipal State Aid Streets Under the provisions of Minnesota Laws; WHEREAS, It appears to the City Council of the City of Mound that the street hereinafter described as Manchester Road should be designated a Municipal State Aid Street under the provisions of Minnesota Law. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound that the streets described as follows, to-wit: Lynwood Boulevard from Commerce Boulevard to Belmont Lane and Belmont Lane, from CSAH 15 to Lynwood Boulevard, be, and hereby is, revoked as a Municipal State Aid Streets of said City subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound that the street described as follows, to-wit: Manchester Road, from Devon Lane to Tuxedo Boulevard, be, and hereby is established, located, and designated a Municipal State Aid Street of said City, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Transportation for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the designation of said street or portion thereof, that same be constructed, improved and maintained as a Municipal State Aid Street of the City of Mound. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of April, 2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel - 1044- ' Mound Police Department Lake Minnetonka Drug Task Force Proposal March 26, 2004 - 1045 - ,~ i .... Ill , L,III Gl' C Lake Minnetonka Drug Task Force - 1046- Introduction The Mound Police Department has been asked to participate In a lake area drug task force. The Lake Minnetonka Drug Task Force would be a cooperative effort between the West Hennepin Public Safety Department, Mound, Orono, and Medina Police Departments, and the Hennepin County SherifCs Office. It will be the first time in history that there has been a concentrated and coordinated effort to enforce narcotic violations in the lake area. Narcotic Enforcement There three basic ways to enforce narcotic violations; 1. Do nothing - allow drugs to enter the community and hope that they will not negatively affect neighborhoods. 2. Reactive Approach - enforce narcotic violations as officers encounter them at loud parties, traffic stops, and nuisance calls. Allow the consequences of the Criminal Justice System to reduce drug use. 3. Proactive Approach - Actively pursue narcotic dealers and users by developing intelligence files, conducting surveillance, working - 1047- informants, conducting under-cover purChases, wire taps, pen registers, and having the ability to charge federally. Proactive Approach Addressing narcotic violations proactively has proven to be successful throughout the country and the state. The majority of mid to upper-level drug dealers are arrested by the use of long-term and specialized investigations. Many Iow-level drug dealers are also arrested, however the majority are arrested by patrol officers during the course of their normal duties (reactive). In the early 80's, President Ronald Reagan declared war on drugs in response to escalating violent crime associated with crack cocaine. His declaration spawned the formation of Multi-jurisdictional Drug Task Force, which at the time were only being used for serial homicide investigations like the Hill Side Strangler and Ted Bunde. Law enforcement learned that in order to climb the "drug dealer ladder" we had to fit in. We needed to have proper vehicles, officers who didn't look like cops, and the ability to work a variety of hours.., because drug dealers don't work 8-4. We also learned that we needed to be able to cross jurisdictions without difficulties, work undercover, have electronic body bugs, have enough officers to follow vehicles without being detected, and have money to make controlled buys, and purchase enough drugs to bring out the "big dealers." - 1048- Mound Narcotic Enforcement The Mound Police Department has traditionally always participated in a Drug Task Force. We were a founding father of the Southwest Metro Drug Task Force (SWMDT), which covers Carver, Scott, McLeod, and Western Hennepin Counties. In 2002, the Police Department was required to pull an officer from SWMDT because Officers Nelson and Alexander left the department. The city elected to pay the SWMDT a $8,400 fee to continue to be a member of the collaboration. In exchange, the SWMDT would continue to investigate narcotic violations in the city. On April 11, 2003 I was hired as the police Chief for Mound. I Immediately began hearing complaints that the Task Force was not responsive to our narcotic problems and had not made one arrest in the City in over twelve months. I met with SWMDT Investigator, Doug Schmidtke to talk with him about the Task Force. He informed me that the SWMDT was in poor shape and that the City of Chaska had recently dropped out of the collaborative. He further informed me that he felt the Task Force was incapable of conducting adequate investigations. He said there were only three investigators to cover the four County area and that they didn't conduct undercover operations. In contrast, the Hennepin County Sheriffs Office has 18 investigators and 4 detectives assigned to their Unit. He told me about an investigation where the suspect was traveling to St. Louis Park to pick-up two ounces of cocaine. He said he tried to follow the suspect, but gave up after a short period because he feared the man would catch on to him. - 1049- I spoke with the Chiefs and Sheriff's of SWMDT about the operation and chose to remove the police department from the Task Force for the following reasons. As a former narcotics investigator, I feel that you cannot effectively target mid to upper level drug dealers if you are not working undercover operations. 2. Three investigators is simply not enough people to run a narcotics unit. Most narcotic investigations require officers for rolling surveillance, back-up and containment perimeters. ~, 3. I don't feel that there is a connection between Mound and McLeod or Scott Counties. 80% of the investigations that I've conducted, the drug dealer lived within 20 miles of their supplier, less than 5% of the time, the supplier lived more than 50 miles away from their supplier. 4. It is my opinion that the Chiefs and Sheriffs were too involved in managing the day-to-day operations of the Task Force. The Chiefs and Sheriffs mandated that the three investigators could not leave their zones to help one another, which in turn further reduced the effectiveness of the unit. - 1050- Lake Minnetonka Drug Task Force The Lake Minnetonka Drug Task Force that is being proposed is being modeled after the South Metro Drug Task Force, which is a collaborative effort involving Eden Prairie, Edina, Minnetonka, and the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office. The South Metro Task Force is administered and supervised by the Sheriff's Office and has been successful enough to fund its operations (excluding salaries) by asset seizures. The South Metro Task Force attributes its success to the relationship with the Sheriffs Office. The relationship allows them the ability to have continues supervision and to tap into all of the other resources the Sheriffs has including financial investigators, 18 narcotic investigators (down town), DEA, specialized surveillance equipment including a surveillance van, and money for large buy cases. The South Metro Task Force recently followed a suspect to Florida with the assistance of the "down-town" Hennepin County investigators and DEA agents. The Lake Minnetonka Drug Task Force would be initiated using seed money provided by West Hennepin Public Safety, and Orono Police Department. The seed money is money that was seized last year by the departments during a coordinated drug investigation. The agencies confiscated over $100,000. -1051 - Lake Area Drug Task Force i Sheriff's I Resources !County ! Attorney i Downtown i i Investigat. i ............................................ ! Hennepin Detective Supervisor iChiefs .............. ! Sheriff r'"~';;;g' ................. .......................................... ! Metro I Mound Officer Orono Officer WHPS Officer Medina Officer · Each agency agrees to provide an officer and equipment. · Asset seizure money stays with the Task Force to fund operations - fuel, phones, clerical staff. C~ · The Task Force would be housed at WHPS. · Each agency pays overtime expenses for their officer. · If the Task Force receives grants, the money will go back to the cities to off-set officer's salaries. · The Hennepin County Sheriffs Office will administer and supervise the program. They will prepare budgets, advisory reports, process asset seizures, and coordinate other activities. ' 1052- ~ Mound Police Department expenses · Take officer out of patrol and assign to task force. · Overtime expenses to cover patrol shifts - $10,000 · Overtime expenses for narcotics officer (200 hours) - $8,OOO · Vehicle - seized car- no expense. · Vehicle insurance $300. · Radio - no expense. · Laptop computer- $1,500. Total increase to budget $19,800 Conclusion The formation of a Lake Area Drug Task Force would make a significant impact in combating illegal narcotic activity. These type of Investigations are complex and often long term. They require undercover investigators, wiretaps, communication equipment, buy money, intelligence data bases, and adequate staffing and supervision. The Lake Minnetonka Drug Task Force is a good fit for the Mound Police Department. The plan is reasonable, economical, tactically sound, and its a very practical approach to illicit drug enforcement. - 1053- Conclusion continued The Lake Minnetonka Drug Task Force is scheduled to start on July 1, 2004. The Police Departments of Medina, West Hennepin Public Safety, and Orono have offered to grant the City of Mound $5,000 to start operations in July. The money would be used to off-set over-time and pay for a lap-top computer. - 1054- 5341 Maywood Road · Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Coundl From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: April 7, 2004 Re: Lakeshore / Dock Lots In recent weeks, Staff has received a number of inquiries regarding the City's subdivision procedures and how to split off a portion of a lakeshore parcel which wOuld be tax-combined with a non-lakeshore parcel for the purpose of providing lake access. For example, a property exceeding the minimum requirements may consider splitting off a portion of his / her lot for the purpose of assigning it to an adjacent parcel which does not include lake frontage. Additionally, there are a number of parcels in Mound which include property on two sides of a City street and/or County road which include lakeshore on one side which could be split off independently and/or combined with an adjacent parcel for the purpose of creating a dock lot. Staff respectfully requests direction on this issue. Presently, the City's subdivision regulations generally contemplates the creation of buildable parcels which conform to the Zoning Ordinance. Additionally, the policy related issues also merit discussion. It is important to note that private agreements between property owners could likely be undertaken to provide lake access. Dock installation and/or regulation however would still be subject to the regulations of the LMCD. -1055~ Mound City Code 330.00 Section 330 - PLATTING AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS 330,01 Purpose. The process of dividing raw land into home sites, or separate parcels for other uses, is one of the most important factors in the orderly growth of any community. Few activities have a more lasting effect upon its appearance and environment. Once the land has been subdivided and the streets, homes and other structures have been constructed, the basic character of this permanent addition to the community has become firmly established. It is then virtually impossible to alter its basic character without substantial expense. In most subdivisions, roads and streets must be maintained and various public services must be provided. The welfare of the entire community is thereby affected in many important respects. It is, therefore, to the interest of the general public, the developer and the future owners that subdivisions be conceived, designed and developed in accordance with sound rules and proper standards. All subdivisions of land hereafter submitted for approval shall fully comply, in all respects, with the regulations set forth herein. It is the purpose of these regulations to: encourage well planned, efficient and attractive subdivisions by establishing reasonable standards for design and construction; provide for the public health, safety and general welfare of residents by requiring properly designed streets, park land and adequate sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water service; place the cost of improvements against those benefiting financially from their construction; and 4. secure the rights of the public with respect to public lands and waters. The Council of the City of Mound deems these regulations to be necessary for the preservation of the health, safety and general welfare of this community. These regulations have been developed under the authority contained in Section 462.358, Minnesota Statutes Annotated (M.S.A.), and are supplemented by appropriate sections of Chapter 505, M.S.A., as indicated. 330.05 Definitions. Subd. 1. Block - A tract of land bounded by streets, or by a combination of streets and public parks, railroad rights-of-Way, shoreline of waterways, or boundary lines of municipalities. Subd. 2, Boulevard - That portion of the street right-of-way between the curb line and the property line. 6/8/03 - 1056- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, April 14, 2004 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Vice Chair Van Hercke READING OF MINUTES- 3/10/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 3/24/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting' PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS · Excelsior Bay Charters, new on-sale intoxicating liquor license application for the charter boat, Summer Winds. 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration Queen of Excelsior, Inc., new on-sale intoxicating liquor license application for the charter boat, Queen of Excelsior II1. 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration Kenneth Peterson, variance application from LMCD Code for dock length requirements at 1074 Wildhurst Trail'. 1. Public Headng 2. Discussion and/or Consideration Lafayette Ridge HOA, new multiple dock license application to increase the size of Boat Storage Units (BSU's) at the conforming facility on Lafayette Bay, 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration WATER STRUCTURES A) Hary Kreslins, new multiple dock license application to increase Boat Storage Units (BSU's)from six to eight at 21965 Minnetonka Blvd. on St. Albans Bay '(Public Hearing conducted at 3/10/04 Regular Board Meeting); -1057- C B) Miles and Pamela Can~ing, consideration of draft Findings of Fact and Order for denial of a dock length and adjusted dock use area variance application at 21100 Excelsior Blvd.; C) (*) 2004 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends Board approval of 2004 renewal, without change, applications for Foxhill HOA and Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club; D). Additional Business; 2. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE A) Review of proposed Action Plan for a more comprehensive zebra mussel program; B) (*) Minutes from the 4/9/04 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting (handout); C) Report from the 4/9/04 EWM/ExOtics Task Force Meeting; D) Additional Business; FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (4/1/04 - 4/15/04); B) Additional Business; LAKE USE & RECREATION A) (*) 2004 Liquor Licenses, staff recommends Board approval of renewal intoxicating Liquor, Wine, and Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquor License applications as outlined in 4/8/04 staff memo; B) Additional Business; 5. ADMINISTRATION A) Update on vacant Administrative Secretary position; B) Additional Business; 6. SAVE THE LAKE 7. EXECUTIVE' DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS t 0. ADJOURNMENT 058- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, Mamh 24, 2004 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Skramstad called the meeting to order at 7:01 p..m. ROLL CALL Members present: Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Eaty Van Hercke, Minnetonka; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Jose Valdesuso, Excelsior; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Orv Burma, Mound; Miles Canning, Greenwood; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Debbie Halvorson, Orono; Pete Nelson, Victoria;. Tom Scanlon, SPdng Park; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland. Also present: Chades LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: None CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Skramstad Skramstad polled, the public tO see what agenda item(s) they were in attendance for; He pointed out that the majodty o,.f the pub ic was in attendance for the "Update-Of the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee" and the "PrOpQsed zebra mussel power point presentation". He stated that if the Board did'nOt object, he would move them up on the. agenda. He recommended that any participation by the public on the "Update of the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee" should be under "PubliC Comments" because a publicheadng had not been scheduled for this topic. READING OF MINUTES-3/10/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting The consensus of the Board was to table action on these minutes to the 4/14/04 Regular Board Meeting. Scanlon arrived at 7:05 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) Ms. Pat M~Golddck, 1,9575 W. Chimo, read a prepared statement, regarding the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub- com'mittee and the`: possib lity of amending the 1974 BoatDensity Policy Statement. She commented that this was not the firsi ti.me the LMCD had considered relaxing the 1974 po.licy, citing a request from theOity of Deephaven in 1976..,a...s an example, She.stated that She bel,ie~ed Carsons Bay was already congested 'enough.and she did not believe CarsOns Bay Shou'd be. used :for expansion, of the Deephaven municipal docking program. The Board received an opinion in 19.9,5 from LeFevemthat he was unaware of anyeyidence that~the Management Plan .superseded the. 1974 pOlicy. She expressed concern about the LMCD relaxing.the existing density policy to allOw for a h~i'bor concept in CarsonS Bay. She pointed out that rafting activities have historicallyoccurred at Big Island and that the number of partic pating boats has increased, which has resulted in some of these boats'relocating to other areas of Lake Minnetonka, including Carsons. Bay. done, rather than less, to protect Lake Minnetonka. She concluded by stating that she believed more needed to be - 1-059- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 24, 2004 Babcock arrived at 7:13 p.m. Page2 Mr. Randy Boyd, 19960 Minnetonka Blvd., commented on the 1974 Boat Density Policy Statement. He restated to the Board his comments from the 2/25/04 Regular LMCD Board Meeting that he believed the sub-committee was established to find a way to add density to Carsons and St. Louis Bays. Applications were received from the City of Deephaven in the spring of 2003 to add boats to St. Louis Bay. He pointed out that it was strongly opposed by a number of residents at that time and one of the discussion points was the 1974 policy. He reviewed the comments made by Board member Babcock at the 3/12/04 Regular Meeting regarding the pending Deephaven applications, noting that Babcock stated that they were.received after the first sub-committee meeting and that he believed they would be reviewed under the existing density policies. St. LoUis and Carsons Bays are established as critically dense based on the 1974 policy and he believed the. policy has prevented further density expansion in. these b~Ys. He stated that Lake Minnetonka was public waters for all residents for the State of Minnesota and that the City of Deephaven should not be able to determine how dense a bay should be. He concluded by stating that the Board should enforce its existing policies rather than amend them. CONSENT AGENDA. Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. Halvorson moved, Burma seconded to approve the consent agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Items so approved include lB, Dancing Waters DCA (Channel, North, peninsula, and South), staff recommends the Board approve a motion to refund a $403..00 deposit for 2004 renewal, without change, multiple dock license applications, 1C, 2004 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends Board approval of 2004 renewal, without change, applications for Jennings Cove Dock Association, City of Minnetonka BeaCh, and Minnetonka Portable Dredging, and 3B, February financial summary and balance sheet. Canning stepped down from the Board during discussion of agenda item lA. 1. WATER STRUCTURES A, Miles and Pamela Canning; discussion of 3/12/04 letter received withdrawing their dock length and adjusted dock use area vadance application. Skramstad asked for background from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that the Board directed LeFevere at the 3/10/04 Regular Meeting to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for denial of the Canning variahce application. However, the letter included in the packet was received in the office on 3/1~04 and LeFevbre-had not begun working on the draft Findings. After conferring with Chair Skramstad and LeFevere, a decision was made' not to preparb these Findings and bring the letter forward to this' Regular Board Meeting for discussion. He believed there are two viewpoints for the Board to conSider, First, the variance application has been withdrawn and there is not a need to prepare Findings of. Fact and Order for denial of the variance application. Second, the Board could still decide to have LeFevere prepare .Findings Of Fact and Order for denial of the cabining variance application, which could prepared for the 4/14/04 Regular Board Meeting. He concluded bY stating that he had discussed this matter with Mr. O'Gara, and heand his wife would tike to have Findings of Fact and Order prepared by LeFevere and acted upon by the BOard to draw closure to the Canning variance application. -10602 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Boar_d Meeting March 24,-2004 - Page3 LeFevere stated that he did not believe the Board had historically insisted on preparing Findings of Fact and Order once an application had been withdrawn, The Board could decide to prepare and adopt Findings of Fact and Order prepared for denial of the Canning application. However, he pointed out that the document would likely be more extensive that the typical Findings for a variance' application, Because of this, the Board might conclude that it would be unreasonable to charge the applicants for preparation of these Findings. Even if Findings of Fact and Order are prepared and subsequently approved by. the Board, it would not Prevent the applicants or any future owners of this site to submit another variance application. The Board discussed a number a number of aspects relating to whether there was a need to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for denial of the Canning variance application. Some of these included: · Whether not prepar ng Findings of Fact and Order would create an ambiguity for future Boards on this variance application. · How the Board would deal with the applicants if they install a dock and store a boat at the dock during the 2004 season. · . Whether it would be advantageous to have Findings of Fact and Order for denial of the Canning variance application at this site. · Whether a bad precedent would be set to allow an applicant to withdraw an application after the Board had directed the LMCD attorney to prepare, Findings of Fact and Order for denial, · Whether there was a need for closure of the variance application because it had been withdrawn. There was discussion that the facts of this withdrawn variance application were quite different from when it was originally withdrawn in 2000. · Whether the Board should take into consideration economics on whether to prepare Findings of Fact and Order, · Whether approval of Findings of Fact and Order could be problematic, for possible lawsuits with similar situations in the future. · Whether withdrawing the variance applicatiOn could have a negative impact on the arrangement proposed by the O'Garas to allow the Cannings to store their pontoon on the O'Gara dock, · Whether there was a need to redirect the LMCD attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order because this was already directed at the 3/10/04 Regular Board Meeting, · Whether there was another means to document the work of the Board on the Canning vadance application rather than preparing Findings of Fact and Order. - 1061 - Lake MinnetOnka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting _March 24, 2004 Page 4 LeFevere stated that one potential drawback of preparation of draft Findings of Fact and Order and subsequent approval of these Findings is that it might result in the applicants appealing these Findings to the court system. One possible alternative for the Board to cOnsider would be to adopt a resolution that would draw closure to the Canning variance application and require a new application and fees if re-applied to the Board in the future. MOTION: Foster moved, Burma seconded to: 1) accept the canning letter, dated 3/12/04, withdrawing their variance application, 2) not require Findings of Fact and Order to be prepared by LeFevere for denial of the Canning variance application, and 3) notify the applicant that any future request for variance from LMCD Code would require a new application with full fees. Babcock stated that he would be comfortable with having LeFevere prepare the Findings of Fact and Order for denial of the Canning variance application as directed at the 3/10/04 Regular Board Meeting. However, because the Cannings have withdrawn their variance application, he questioned whether the Board would need to take action on the draft Findings. He stated that he would support the motion if Foster and Burma agreed to this as a friendly amendment. Seuntjens stated that he was more concerned about documenting the work of the Board on this variance application rather than what party was to pay for the Findings. Scanlon asked for an overview of the policy for preparing Findings of Fact and Order. LeFevere explained that Findings of Fact and Order are prepared because of state law. The law states that if a public body, such as the LMCD, makes a decision and does not adopt contemporaneous Findings, it is presumed to be arbitrary as a matter of law. There are distinctions when the LMCD is compared to the member cities because it is common for planning commissions to prepare Findings for consideration by the respective city council. VOTE: Ayes (3; Burma, Foster, and Valdesuso), Nayes (10); motion denied. MOTION: Babcock moved, Knudsen seconded to direct the LMCD attorney to continue preparation of the Findings of Fact and Order for denial of the Canning Variance application to be considered at a future Regular Meeting. - Foster asked who would be responsible for the preparation of the Findings since the applicants have withdrawn their variance application. Babcock stated that he believed the Draft Finding should be billed to the applicants because he did not envision any changes to the prior Board action and this took place prior to the letter withdrawing the variance application. Knudsen stated that he agreed with the comments of Babcock. VOTE: Ayes (10), Nayes (3; Burma, Foster, and Valdesuso); motion carried. - 1062- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting - March 24, 2004 - page 5 D, Additional Business. There was no additional business. ADMiNiSTRATiON - A. Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission, discuSsion with Station Manager Jim Lundberg on the possibility of taping LMCD Regular Board Meetings. Skramstad asked for background from NYbeck on this agenda item. Nybeck stated that he provided the Board an update on this at a recent Regular Board Meeting on possible facilities to tape LMCD Regular Board Meetings for the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (LMCC). Staff was directed to check into the PosSibility of holding LMCD Regular ~Oard Meetings in the future at Minnetonka and Wayzata City Halls. He pointed out that he had visited both city halls and the city council chambers would be of adequate size. Similar to other city halls, he believed there were a number of logistical questions to be addressed regarding how the city council chambers could be arranged to meet the size requirement of the 14 Board members. There are also other logistical questions regarding cameras and · audio systems, There appears to be'a possible meeting schedule conflict at the City of Minnetonka and he suggested that further investigation should be primarily at the' City of Wayzata. He pointe~! out that LMCC Station Manager Jim Lundberg was in attendance to comments on this agenda item and answer questions of the Board. Mr.~ Jim Lundberg stated thatthe LMCO is a joint powers agreement that conSi~[S of the majodty the LMCD member cities, excluding Minnetonka and Wayzata. The majodty of'the city' cOUncil meetings for these member cities are covered free of charge because the LMCC believes that information is valuable to their constituents. The LMCC believes that the information provided at LMCD Regular Board Meeting is also valuable to the lake constituer~'ts and the LMCC would like to offer the same service. He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Nelson stated that exotics species, primarily zebra mussels, are a key concern to Lake Minnetonka. In addition to covering LMCD Regular Board Meetings, he Stated that he would like to get a commitment from the LMCC to play an intermediary role on collecting and distributing information on this. Lundberg stated that some of these services are already being provided with the Lake Minnetonka Association (LMA) through weekly programming, with an emphasis on exotics..spe~cies. If the LUCD,would like additional programming, he stated that he would be agreeable to check'iurthbi ihto thiS. The Board discussed this and the general consensus was for Nybeck to further check into the.feasibility of using Wayzata City Hall as a possible alternative location in the neat future in coordination With Board member Ambrose and Lundberg. Skramstad stated that he believed there Were a number of members of the public in attendance to participate in the discussion of the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee Update. Although this was not scheduled on the regular agenda, he believed it would be discussed un'der "Old Business". If the Board did not object, he C C Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting -- "' '-March 24, 2004 - Page 6 stated that he would move "Old Business" in front of agenda item 2B. There were no objections from the Board, OLD BUSINESS. Skramstad asked for an update of the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee from Foster. Babcock stated that at the most recent Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee meeting, there were a number of revisions to be made to the Report that was included in the handout folders. He believed he had a commitment after that meeting that updates and revisions to this Report would be forwarded to all sub- committee member for their review and comments. He stated that he was not afforded this opportunity and he expressed concern about this. Foster stated that he misunderstood what Babcock pointed out that he would not be opposed to' allow other sub- committee members to review this Report prior to reviewing it at the Board level. Van HerCke stated that she was an active member of the sub-committee and she was not afforded an opportunity to review the Report. She stated that she would like the sub,committee to continue; however, she believed 'there was a need to clarify the coordination and communication between the Chair and the remaining sub-committee members. She questioned whether a conflict existed because there are a number of Deephaven residents interested in the sub-committee and the Chair represents the City of Deephaven. The Board disctjSsed this matter and the general consensus was for Foster to work with sub-committee members on finalizing the Report to update the Board on the activities of the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee A few Board members expressed an interest in conducting a public hearing in the'near future to get public input on the discussion and recommendations of the sub-committee. MOTION: Babcock moved, Ambrose seconded to tab e further discussion of this agenda item until all Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee members have had an opportunity to finalize the Report. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was recessed at 8:39 p.m. and re-convened at 8:50 p.m. Skramstad stated that if the Boaid did not object, he woUld like to move agenda item 4A in front of agenda item 2B. There were no objections, EWM/EXOTICs TASK FORCE A, Review of proposed zebra mussel power point presentation. Skramstad asked for background on this agenda item from Nelson. Nelson stated that he had been working with Suerth on this project and he concurred with Suerth that preventing the introduction of zebra mussels is a war and that he:would rather go down fighting rather than do nothing. He provided a summary of the work that has been done do date on the power Point presentation. Some of the comments include: -1064- -=i Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 24, 2004 Page 7 · A poster has been located with a theme of"Lake Minnetonka- Almost Paradise". He believed that this theme could be merchandised with the "Save the Lake" Fund being used a means to assist in prevention efforts. · He reviewed adult zebra mussels and the impacts they could have on boats, docks, and beaches. He reviewed a chart of the entire U.S, that illustrated infested waters and how they have spread over the years. He pointed out that the number of infested waters has grown over the years and that they are getting closer to Lake Minnetonka, He reviewed the extraordinary growth rates of veligers, pointing out that 500,000 could be contained with a cubic meter of water. In a lake in Wisconsin, 1.6 million were counted in a cubic meter of water. Over 95 percent of these die off, with some of them eaten by carp, with no effective means to eradicate them. As they reach the adult stage, up to 10,000 could exist within a cubic meter. He pointed out that zebra mussels are filter feeders, with each of them filtering one liter of water per day. Although this could improve water clarity, it poses some other problems. Zebra mussels eat algae; however, they do not eat blue algae that is poisonous to humans. Zebra mussels have an usually.high fat content for mollusks. Although they take undesired PCB's from the lake, there will be undesired impacts because these impacts will be relocated to the shorbline when the zebra mussels settle in these locations. Assumptions included in the presentation are: 1) zebra mussels are bad, 2) prevention is the only cure, 3) the only solution is with the boaters themselves, and 4) the LMCD needs be part of a larger effort to keep them out of Lake Minnetonka. He provided a brief review of the methodology to accomplish this, which included the charter of the LMCD, the defined objectives, and strategies with defined techniques. He proposed a four level line of defense to prevent the introduction of zebra mussels and other exotic species into Lake Minnetonka. The outer lines of defense require the assistance of the MN DNR and other groups inspecting boats as they leave infested waters or when theY are in transit on the roadways. The two inner lines of defense requiring the attention of the LMCD and other groups to educate boaters and inspect boats prior to entering. Lake Minnet0nka. He pointed ou[ that there are strategies for each of these four lines of defense. Fundraising is going to be a key element of a more comprehensive program; however, the LMCD will need to live within its means. He suggested that any fundraisil!g e~ods should be coordinated through the "Save the Lake" Fund and discussed a variety of ways to fbhdraise for this project. · He discussed possible ways for the LMCC, the MN DNR, and the Minnesota Sea Grant to assist in this effort. He believed that it was crunch time and. that there were difficult decisions for the Board to make. He questioned how aggressive the Board wanted to get on this issue. - 1065- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 24, 2004 Page 8 3~ The Board discussed a vadety of things relating to this program. Some of them inclUded: how successful a more aggressive program might be, including for how long; how much funding would be needed to get this started; what events to participate in, including what to merchandise; how to deal with commercial transporters; how to deal with commercial facilities on Lake Minnetonka that have facilities on the MissisSiPpi River; and whether there was a need to hire a lobbyist. The consensus of the Board was that further details of this project should be clarified in an action plan for discussion at the 4/14/04 Regular Meeting. Mr. Dick Osgood, LMA Executive Director, stated that he was encouraged by the Presentation and that the LMA was willing help on this project. ADMINISTRATION B. Training session for Board members on Open Meeting Law. The consensus of the Board was to re-schedule this agenda for a future Regular Board Meeting. Additional Business. There was no additional business. FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers (3/16/04 - 3/31/04). Knudsen reviewed the audit of vouchers as submitted. MOTION: Foster moved, Skramstad seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Additional Business. There was no additional business. EwM!ExOTICS TASK' FORCE Additional Business., There was no additional business 5. LAKE USE & RECREATION There was no discussion. 6. SAVETHE LAKE Thers was no discussion. - 1066- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 24, 2004 Page9 7~" EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Nybeck updated the Board on three items. First, he reported that he and Harper had interviewed eight candidates for the vacant Administrative Secretary position. A second interview will be conducted of two or three of these candidates and a recommendation will be made at the 4/14/04 Regular Board Meeting. Second, a copy of the updated MN DNR General Permit 97-6098 was included in the handout folders. Third, charges have been filed against two individuals involved in the July 4th accident last summer at Cruiser's Cove and he indicated that he would keep the Board up to date on this. 8. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business, 9. NEW BUSINESS Burma updated the Board on an apparent docking violation in the City of Mound, The dock originates from a site that has approximately five feet of shoreline with converging side site lines. A complaint has been received from one of the abutting neighbors and they do not consent to the current dock installation. This neighbor has asked what the LMCD intends to do in 2004 to bring this dock in compliance, pointing out that he believed a cdminal prosecution might be required and that this would require a survey. The Board discussed this matter and the consensus was that Nybeck shot~ld come back to a future Regular Board Meeting with a recommendation to authorize staff to conduct a survey for this site if a cdminal prosecution is the course of action decided this upcoming boating season. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:54 p.m. Tom Skramstad, Chair- Jose Valsdesuso, Secretary -1067- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT . BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, March 10, 2004 Tonka Bay City Hall DRAFT CALL TO ORDER - Skramstad called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Orr Burma, Mound; Miles Canning, Greenwood; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Debbie Halvorson, Orono; Pete Nelson, Victoria; Tom Scanlon, Spring Park; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach.. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Herb Suerth, Woodland; Jose Valdesuso, Excelsior. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Skramstad There were no Chair announcements. READING OF MINUTES. 2/25/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting MOTION: Burma moved, Foster seconded to approve the minutes from the 2/25/04 Regular LMCD Board Meeting as submitted. Van Hercke addressed the public comments raised by Mr. Randy Boyd at the 2/25/04 Regular Board Meeting regarding the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee. She. pointed out that she was an active participant on this sub-committee and she took except on to the comment made by Mr. Boyd that that the current direction was to eliminate the 1974 policy to allow the pending application submitted by the City of Deephaven to be approved She believed the primary purpose of the sub,committee was to audit the 1974 policy with the management plan. VOTE: Ayes (7), Abstained (3; Canning, Seuntjens, and Van Hercke); motion carried. PUBLIC' COMMENTS. Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) Mr. PaU! Skrede, ! 8875 Azure Road, stated that he was a member of the Deephaven City Council, He stated that he' was confused on the process of the LMCD on the voting procedures to direct the attomey to prepare Findings' ofF. act and Order and' the actUa voting on pend ng appliCations. He expressed concern that a certain vote CoUld oCCur at one meeting and be reversed at a subsequent meeting because of the potential impact it could have on the applicants. Skr~mstad stated that PreParation and consideration of Findings of Fact and Order is a two step process. First, a public hearing and BOard discuSsion is conducted for a proposed application(s). Based on this, the Board could direct the attorney to prepare draft F~ndings of Fact and Order for either approva_[or denial of the application(s). -1068- _ . Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular BOard Meeting ~ _ - March 10, 2004 .-- - Page 2 Second, the draft Findings of Fact and Order prepared by I~gal cOunsel are generally either voted up or down at a subsequent Regular Board Meeting. LeFevere concurred with the comments of Skramstad. He pointed out that the first action by the Board is to direct him prepare draft Findings of Fact and Order for either approval or denial of an application(s) rather than a final decision on the application(s). He believed that the process that the LMCD utilizes for preparation of Findings of Fact and Order is consistent with other cities that he represents. However, he pointed out that one significant difference was that most cities have a planning commission that makes recommendations to the city council and that the recommendation may include proposed Findings, although the city council does not always approve this recommendation. _. Babcock.arrived at 7:09 p,m. CONSENT AGENDA. Consent' agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. Van Hercke moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the consent agenda as submitted. Motion Carried unanimously. Items so approved include: 1E, 2004 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends Board approval of 2004 renewal, without change applications for Dancing Waters DOA (channel, north, peninsula, and south sites), City of Deephaven, and Smithtown Bay association, and 3B, January financial summary and balance sheet. PUBLIC HEARING · Hary Kreslins, new multiple dock license application to increase Boat Storage Units (BSU's) from six to eight at 21965 Uinnetonka Blvd. on St. AlbanS Bay. Skramstad opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. and asked for background from Harper. Harper made the following comments: · -The applicant has submitted a new multiple dock license application for Board consideration for a facility on St. Albans Bay in the City of Greenwood. The facility is currently approved for six BSU's on 320' of continuous 929.4' shoreline. This Survey has been updated and he has documented an' increase in 929.4' shoreline to 407'. Based on this increase, he submitted the application to increase BSU's from six to eight. · A public hearing was conducted for the application at the 6/11/03 Regular Board Meeting and continued to the 6/25t03 Regular Meeting.to allow the applicant to work with the CitY of Green,wood on pending issues. The publiC hea'dng was' re,opened' at the 6/25/03'Regular Meeting and subsequently continued to the 7/23/03 Regular Meeting to allow the applicant to resolve pend ng issues with Greenwood. A Waiver form to the 60 day rule was signed and received from the applicant, The public hearing was Cl0Sed'to ah Unsp'ecified Regular Board ~eet!ng .With Staff to re-advertiSe To comply with this direction, staff re,advertised for this Public hearing in the 2J24/04 edition of ibc Lakeshore Weekly News. Code Section 2.03, subd. 7 requires a new multiple dock license application when there is any change in slip size, ownership, width, height or location of structure. Because the proposed project would increase slip sizes and add dock structure, a new multiple dock license application with Public hearing is required. - 1069- C C Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 10, 2004 - Page 3 · Code Section 2.0! prohibits a person from using any area of the Lake outside an authorized dock use area for docking and storage of watercraft. Both the approved and proposed site plans are contained with the authorized dock use area for this site. · Code Section 2.03 allows the Board to utilize a number of subjective criteria in exerCising its discretion in granting or denying applications. One subjective criterion that the Board might want to discuss is "Whether the proposed facility is compatible with LMCD watercraft density classification criteria", This subjectiVe criterion, refers to the 1974 Boat Density Policy Statement that has established five warning conditions as indices to assist the Board in making a determination whether to make a designation of "Critical". If any of these indices is met by actual use of the Lake, the Executive Director should assign a "Potentially Critical" designation and the Board notified. If two or more indices are met, the area should be designated as "Critical" and referred to the Board for remedial action. He pointed out that St: Albans Bay meets or exceeds all five indiCes. · Last May, the City of Greenwood expressed concern about the proposed number of BSU's and the restriction in the City Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions. The Greenwood City Council reviewed the Kreslin application at the 2/3/04 city council meeting with momentum to approve it, subject to review of the 20' fire lane by the Fire Marshall. Further discussion is planned for the 3/15/04 GreenwoOd city cOuncil meeilng. · Staff believes the Board could approve the new multiple dock license application for 2003, subject to: 1) the appliCant Submitting a revised site plan that documents the pilings between the proposed slips, and 2) the applicant securing all requisite permits, licenses, and approvals from the City of Greenwood and other governmental agencies. · He entertained'questions or comments from the Board. NYbeck re-stated that the apPlicatiOn was received last spdng for the 2003 season and that the public hearing was conducted in June. Because of pending issues with the City of Greenwood, the public hearing was continued and nO action has been taken on the new multiple dock license application=, He recommended that it Was not uncommon for an applicant to Work on a dual track with the LMCD and the member city on a proposed prOjeCt, citing the WaYzata Yacht Club jib crane proposal as an example. He believed that the Board could aPprove the application with the condition that the applicant secure all requisite permits, licenses, and aPprovals from the City of Greenwood. Scanlon asked for clarification on the location of the site lines because of the increased amount of shoreline at this site. Nybeck stated that. there has been previous discussion On how the 929.4' shoreline increased from 320' to 407'. Although he'cdUId not ciadfy how this~ increase in shoreline occurred, he pointed out that the survey submitted by the applicant was registered. Harper stated that he had researched the historical folder for this site and he believed the hand drawn site plan originally proposed might have' caused this increase. Babcock questioned whether the shoreline associated with the easement at the north end of the site was being double counted with the adjacent multiple dock facility. He pointed out. that there are easements on both ends of the site and he would like to have the documents to ensure that they do not affect docking dghts, especially at the south end of the site near the channel and Minnetonka Blvd. _ -1070- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting -- - March 10, 2004 ..... -Page 4 Nybeck stated that the abutting site was St. AIbans Bay Villas and the shoreline associated with the easement referred to by Babcock was not being double counte& Harper stated that the 407' of shoreline at this site does not include the shoreline on the north side of the channel under the bridge. Mr. Hary Kreslins, 21965 Minnetonka Blvd., addressed the questiOn relating to how the shoreline increased. Years ago when the .original plan was approved, the shoreline was estimated by walking the shoreline rather than through a registered survey. Ms. Jeannie Bowers, 21600 Fairview Street, made the following comments: · The City of Greenwood has not been negligent in its duties to review their concerns with Mr. Kreslins. The applicant had requested on numerous times to postpone discussion at the city level. She expressed concem about the increase of 929.4' shoreline and how a future owner of this site could propose additional expansion. · The Boat Density Policy statement was adopted in 1974 by the Board, In connection with that the policy, the LMCD determined in 1973 that St. Albans Bay was already at or over the cdtical levels as to all of the five indices. · She made four comments regarding the 1974 policy. First, the LMCD has determined in the exercise of its legislative discretion that there is a need to regulate the number of boats stored on Lake Minnetonka for the protection of the natural resource and the use and enjoyment of the lake by the public. Second, the LMCD has made a number of determinations relating to the need for regulation of boat storage density on Lake Minnetonka. Third, the 1973 policy of the LMCD concluded, among other things, that St. Albans Bay was already at a cdtical density with respect to all indices for determining whether use of any given area of the lake was at a critical density. The lake as a whole in 1973, when averaged together, was not critically dense. Fourth, the law does not .require that a public agency wait until a public resource is completely destroyed before ii'takes steps to correct the situation. The LMCD regulations were designed to prevent the entire lake from becoming critically overcrowded, and to prevent areas that were already cdtical!y overcrowded.from becoming worse. She believed that density on St. Albans Bay had increased with recent approvals at Excel Marina and the Nedegard property. · She reviewed parts of the state enabling legislation that created LMCD. Additionally., she reviewed parts of the City of Greenwood comprehensive plan regarding boat storage and public safety. · The LMCD can exercise its legislative discretion and she believed that there was a need to regulate the number of boats stored on Lake Minnetonka for the protection of the natural resource and the use and enjoymbnt of the lake by the public. She requested that. the Board start now. · She entertained questions or comments by the Board, Skramstad stated that there was a sub-committee of the Board currently established to review existing density policies. He was aware of the 1974 policy referred to by Ms. Bowers and he did not .believe the Board had used it in the recent past in determining whether or not to approve or deny an application for additional docks. FbSter stated that an application was received some years ago aLthe Excel Mar na site, formedy known as St. Albans Bay Madna, to increase BSU's, The City of Greenwood recommended denial of the application and the Board denied it on a split vote. The marina took the LMCD to district court and prevailed, with the '1071 - ,i, .m , ,mai ,& ~,, ,. ]iii , L,ILI Lake Minnetonka ConserVation District Regular Board Meeting March 10, 2004 _ Page LMCD required i0 issue the permit they denied, He believed the marina owner prevailed because it meets the objective Code requirements and because there were other commemial marinas in that area of St. Albans Bay. He believed that it would be difficult to deny the new multiple dock license based on the 1974 policy when the facility meets the objective criteria for density and dock use area requirements. Bowers stated that the Kreslins site is homesteaded and that there are a number of residential sites nearby, excluding Excel Marina and Beans Greeenwood Madna. NYbeck stated that the adjacent site to the north, St. Albans Bay Villas, was a licensed multiple dock facility rather than a commercial dock facility. This facility was approved in recent years when the conversion of use Code section was amended fOr the old Cochrane's Boatyard commercial marina site. Foster stated that he concurred that the St. Albans Villas site was a licensed multiple dock licensee and that he recalled there was a net reduction of boat storage at the Cochrane's Boatyard site when the conversion of use Code was amended. Harper clarified that the applicant's facility would meet the 1:50' General Rule. Other facilities in the immediate area include EXcel Marina (Sites 1 and 2) with a density of 1:10', St. Albans Bay Villas with the density of 1:20', and Beans Greenwood Marina with a grandfathered density that greatly exceeds 1:10'. Mr, Judd Mowry, 445 Lakeview Avenue, stated that he had appeared before the Board on the application a number of times in the past year. He expressed concern about Note 1 and he believed it should be further clarified. Note 1 states "Boundary and easement information is subject to change and is to be added pending receiPt of current deed and title information". He continued to express his concerns about the increase in 929.4' ShOreline from 320' to 407'i He circulated and discussed a survey he recently located at Hennepin County regarding the site and the channel area under the bridge, He reminded the Board of the City of Greenwood attorney opinion in 1998 that the waterway along Minnetonka Bivd. and under the bridge was under the control and ownership of the city rather than the applicant, Nybeck stated that he recalled the 1998 letter referred to by Mowry; however, he believed the Greenwood city attorney recommended that a survey Would need to be conducted in order to verify this legal opinion, Foster stated that believed the LMCD.had not historically resolved shoreline disputes between two parties. He believed that the appr0p.riate venue to resolve these disputes is the legal system and that the Board would reSPond accordingly tala court order. The survey submitted by the applicant was registered and he was corfifortable accepting it. ~ Babc°ck stated that he agreed the BOard was not the right venue to resolve land dispute issues, However, he believbd it was the burden of{he apPiicant to clear up conflicting survey information by whatever means necessary. This does not always require a court ruling and could be reso red by !he various parties, He preferred that the Board not take action on the application until this has been resolved, He stated that he would like to resolve Note 1 on the proposed survey Pd0r to the Board taking action. Canning stated that he had talked to Nancy Kelm from the City of Greenwood regarding the application. The City of Greenwood is scheduled to further review it at the .3/15/04 city council ~meeting. He believed that the - 1072- Lake. Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March. 10, 2004 -- _ ...... _ Page 6 review by the City of GreenwoOd was independent of the LMCD, noting that the applicant would be required to secure approval from both government agencies. There being no further comments, Skramstad closed the public hearing at 7:41 p.m. The Board briefly discussed how the Board has dealt with dghts of way and fire lanes in the Past. A number of Board members expressed an interest in the aPplicant reSolving the fire lane issue with the City of Greenwood, Three other pieces information that a number of Board members expressed an interest in included: 1) requiring the applicant to Submit the easement documentS to ensure that there are not restrictions on docking, 2) reSOlving Note 1 on the proposed survey, and 3) ensuring that the proposed docks would not cause an imPediment to the channel leading to Excelsior Bay and the traffic pattern at the Beans Greenwood Marina gas dock. MOTION: Babcock moved,. Van' Hercke seconded to send back the Hary Kreslins new multiple dock license application to staff for: 1) the applicant to submit the documents for the easements to ensure that there are not restrictions on docking, 2) to allow the applicant to resolve Note 1 (~n the proposed survey, and 3) to secure an aerial photo of the proposed site, with the other sites in the immediate area, to ensure that it would create an impediment to navigation, especially the Beans Greenwood Madna gas dOck. VOTE: Motion carried Unanimously Skramstad stated that Nybeck had recommended to him to move agenda item lB ahead of lA because he believed it was straight forward. If there were no objectionS, he stated that he would move agenda item lB ahead of IA. The Board eXpreSsed no objections. WATER STRUCTURES B. Cardinal Cove Beach Association, consideration of 2004 new multiple dock license minor change application. _ Skramstad asked for background on thiS agenda item from Nybeck.' Nybeck'stated that the staff mem~) prepared by Harper, dated 3/5!05 was ~elatively self-explanatory. The multiple dock facility currently conforms to Code for the 1:50' General Rule and is fully contained within the au'tho~zed dock Use area for this site. The applicant has Proposed four changes and the question for the Board was whether they were major or minor changes based on interpretation of Code. If the Board concludes that the four changes are minor, a public hearing !s not required and staff would recommend approval of the applicatii~n f0i' the 2004 ~eason. If the Board concludes that they.are not minor, the applicant would need to submit a new multiPle dock license application that would require a pUblic hearing.~ He entertained questions or domment. The Board discussed the propOsed Changes and the consensus was that they should qualify as a minor change rather than a major change. MOTION: Foster moved, Burma seconded to aPprove the Cardinal Cove Beach Association new multiple dock license minor change application for the 2004 season. ~'-1073- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting -March 10, 2004 Page7 VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Canning stepped down from his position on the Board at 7:58 p.m. A. Miles and Pamela Canning, consideration of vadance application from LMCD Code for setback requirements and an adjusted dock use area at 21100 Excelsior Blvd. on St. Albans Bay (Public Hearing conducted at the 1/14/04 Regular Board Meeting).' Skramstad asked for comments on the pending Canning variance application, He aSked for background or comments on the application, Foster · made the following comments: An application was submitted three or four years ago because there has been some docking problems in the immediate area in recent years. He reviewed a Iocator map that identified the location of the Cannings, the Johnsons that are the abutting neighbor to the nOrth, and the O'Garas that are the abutting neighbor to the south. · Problems in this area include converging lot lines, which result in overlapping dock use areas. To address these problems, an application for vadance from Code was received with these problems being the proposed hardships. · The public hearing for this application was conducted at the 1/14/04 Regular Meeting, with no action taken bythe Board. At this meeting, he agreed to mediate the aPPlication with the applicant and the abutting neighbors, The O'Garas have offered the applicants the ability to store the applicants' 22.5' long pontoon at their dock; however, the apPliCants would prefer to secure a vadance to assure theYcould legal access to the lake. He pointed out that he had three options for the Board to consider; however, there was not complete agreement on any of them. · Plan A is preferred by the applicants and would cOnsist of a 32' long dock and a 9" wide lift to store their pontoon boat~ This would require adjusting the Canning/Johnson common side site line...Both the Johnsons and the O'Garas have agreed to_ provide the applicants a 10' corridor without structure and boat storage for navigational purposes to the Canning dock. In this plan, relief to be provided to the Johnsons and the O'Garas would include a zero foot setback from the side site lines and longer dock use areas. · Plan B would consist of a dock use area that would extend 20' into the lake and wOuld utilize a small dock and roll a dock marine railway syStem. Although this plan would require the reduction of the Canning/Johnson common side site line, it would be greatly reduced compared to Plan A. Similar to Plan A~ this would.also require a 10' corridor, withOUt structure and boat storage for navigational purposes~ · Plan C would consist of a triangular dock use area With a zero foot Side setback within it. There would be no restriction on the size of the boat stored within the dock use area at a roll a dock marine railway system. However, the boat would need to be stored fully within the doCk use area and.this would likely restrict the size of the boat. 'This plan was preferred by the johnsons and O'Garas. of-the three options and would also require a 10' corridor Without structure and boat storage for navigational purposes. · He encouraged the Board to consider the application carefully because this proposal is an example on how to deal with narrow lots. Mr. Johnson has PropoSed a general poliCy that boat storage at narrow lots should not exceed 50 pement'of the width of the lot. He: believed that this -1~74- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting . March 10, 2004 _. - Page 8 policy had some merit and should be discussed by the Board sometime in the near future. · Although the applicants' dock has existed for several years, he cautioned the BOard about using this fact in its decision making process because it has only existed through mutual consent. If mutual consent is used as a hardship to approve this variance, it might discourage mutual consent in other situations in the future. · tn years when the Board has declared Iow water, the Johns0ns and 'O'Garas. have proposed that they should be granted temporary dock length extensions pdor to the applicants receiving a temporary Iow water variance. · He encouraged a general discussion by the BOard of the Canning variance application and the three plans he reviewed. Babcock expressed concern about a conflict if the Johnson and O'Gara sites are approved for a zero foot setback from the Canning dock use area and are required to maintain a 10' corddor for navigational purposes. Mr. Jason Johnson, 5600 Maple Heights ROad, stated that he believed reasonable accommodations could be made by the two abutting properties for the 10' corridor. If this Cannot be accomplished by the two abutting properties, he believed that the Findings could be prepared that would require an equal amount of water surface use from the abutting properties. Mr. Rick O'Gara, 2.1120'.Excelsior Blvd., commented on his dock installation in 2003 and what he would consider in 2004 and beyond. In 2003, his dock was approximately eight feet off the Canning side site line and was angled to his neighbors dock use area on the other side of his property, the Richters, because of the Canning dock installation; He stated that he would like to have the ability to have an 80' long dock. Ms. Debbie O'Gara, 21120 Excelsior Blvd., stated that she would like to better understand the communication the applicants had with the pdor owner of their property relating to docking and boat storage when they purchased it. She stated that she and her husband were mislead by a realtor on their docking rights when they recently purchased their property. She encouraged Mr. Canning to consider withdrawing the variance application and tal~e advantage of the propOSal to store the boat at their dock. She expressed concern about the surveying expenses that she and her husband had incurred. She believed a fourth option not. proposed by Foster was to deny the Canning variance application. Foster stated that. property owners on Lake Minnetonka are entitled to riparian rights, although they are not cleady defined, He believed that the Canning site has demonstrated some sort of a hardship based on LMCD Code; however, he questioned what reasonable access would be. He suggested that this was a fundamental quest on for the Board to address. Babcock stated .that he.bel eved the denial of the variance application was an option for the Board to consider. He believed there are lots on the lake that do not support boat storage because of setback requirements in LMCD:Code.. Legally, he believed there is an established righ.ttO dock to a point of navigability, although this might not include boat storage. LeFevere stated owners of riparian properties have a bundle of rights, including the ability to dock to the point Of navigability. However~ these rights are subject to reasonable regUlati~nS~ - 1075- C Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Me_eting March 10, 2004 Page 9 Mr. Miles Canning, 21100 Excelsior Blvd., thanked the neighbors and the Board for their consideration of the variance application. He believed that the policy of alloWing neighbors to mutually consent to non- conforming side setbacks was generally good. However, one problem is that neighbors change and relationships change, which is the case in this situation. He expressed concern about withdrawing the variance application and resolving it at the neighborhood level because that was what occurred in 2000. The proposal is to memorialize what has occurred historically at these sites pdor to the establishment of the LMCD. In situations where extended side site lines are not parallel, a vadance process has been established to resolve these hardships. He believed that his 12' wide shoreline was adequate to install a two foot wide dock and store his pontoon on a 9' wide boat lift. He encouraged the Board to utilize common sense in its decision making process and grandfather historical use at this site. He stated that he believed the application meets the decision standards used by the Board in requests for variances from Code and that there are facilities that meet or exceed the 1:10' density standard th at he was requesting. Babcock stated that Code prohibits the granting of 1:10' density at pdvate residences because it only applies to public facilities. Additionally, Code only allows abutting neighbors to mutually consent to something that conforms to Code. For example, the Code allows abutting neighbors to mutually consent to reduce minimum side setback requirements. Although this site has converging lot lines, he questioned whether it was a valid hardship becaUse a site with less than 12' of shoreline and parallel lot lines would have Problems meeting a five foot setback from the extended side site lines. He concluded that the mutual consent requirement was reasonable and should be worked out on a case by case basis. If the Board was to memorialize historical use at this site, he believed it might result in a disincentive for mutual consent in the future. Canning stated that one problem associated with continuing to utilize mutual consent was that it was a short term solution. Mr. Johnson stated that there were two residents on each side of the applicants' site who opposed the variance application. He expressed concem about the impact of the request on the neighborhood and value of his preperty. The propoSal to store a pontoon at the applicants' site would have a significant impact on his ability to store watercraft within' the'doCk use area for his site. He believed that the neighborhood was attempting to find a resolution and he thanked Foster for his efforts. Additionally, he thanked the O'Garas for the time and money they spent on the survey work prepared. He believed that the applicants have dparian rights; however, he questioned whether it was reasonable to store a pontoon boat at their site. The O'Gara and Olson sites were undeveloped a number of years ago and this provided greater flexibility on the location of docks and storage of watercraft at them. Since these siteS have been developed in recent years, this has created a different situation for docking and boat storage. He concluded th'at he was concerned about safety problems i~ the area and the 'precedent it could cause for the lake. Knudsen asked Mi'. Johnson what was his preferred plan was. Mr. Johnson stated that he would prefer Plan C. Ms. Shannon Richter, 21150 Excelsior Blvd., stated_that her main concern was for safety of the children - 1 076- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 10, 2004 Page 10- in the immediate area. She stated that the neighbors in the immediate area pay a greater amount of property taxes than the applicantS do because of the amount of shoreline they own. She believed it was gracious for the O'Garas to offer use of their dock to the Cannings and she suggested that the applicants should reconsider their pOsition on this. Mr. Brad Richter, 21150 Excelsior Blvd., made the following comments: · The Board should review extenuating circumStanCes where the neighbors do not oppose. In this case, there is no extenuating circumstance and the neighbors oppose. · Under the propoSed variance, there would be an approximately 1'0' wide channel between the Johnson and O'Gara docks for an eight foot wide boat. He believed that this congestion was not safe because they have children who, he hoped, wOUld be able to safely swim in the area. · This proposed variance, if granted, would set a precedent by granting dock use outside ones legal metes and bounds. He believed that this precedent would not be in the best interest of Lake Minnetonka and he questioned who would be liable if an accident occurs from the passing of this variance. · The Cannings have dparian lake access without hardship. The O'Garas have offered the use of their dock; however, the Cannings have declined this offer. The Cannings are trying to encroach on their neighbors" use of the lake causing diStress amongst their neighbors. · He recommended that the Board remove Excelsior representative Jose Valdesuso from voting.on this issue beCauSe he sold the property to the Cannings and has a conflict of interest. · The applicant is a member Of the Board on behalf of the City of Greenwood. Because he has removbd himself from VOting' on this variance appl cation, he believed the residents did not have fair representation. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Nelson asked what the current lake level was. Nybeck stated that the last lake level reading taken last fall that he was aware of was 927.99'. Nelson stated that he believed the Board had the ar~ility to grant a variance from Code during normal periods of water. The Board could grant docking rights during Iow water years; however, he was not granting a variance on abutting propert es Skramstad stated that he supported dparian rights and he believed the marine railway system was best plan proPOsed bY Foster. Mr. O'Gara complimented the efforts of Foster to mediate the variance appli.c..ation. However, the believed aPprOvai of the aPPlication would be. a bad policY because of the width of the site. He repeated his offei' to' allOW'the Cannings to store their pontoon at his and his wife's dock. He believed the Cannings have riparian rights; however, historical use would require reduction of the adjacent dock use areas. This was the primary reaso.n, for the emotions expressed by the abutting property owners because it would result in a taking of the adjacent dock Use areas. If the Board was inclined to grant a variance, he recommended that it be very limited on what could be done at the applicants' site. He believed that Plan C would be the best plan to accomplish this. Vah Hercke stated that she could relate to narrow sites that require mutual consent amongst neighbors - 1077- C' CI Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 10, 2004 because she resided on Libbs Lake. purchasing a property. Page However, homeowners need to research docking 'rights prior to Ms. Molly Johnson, 5600 Maple Heights Road, stated that she had public safety concerns relating to the variance application. The applicants have communicated to her and her husband that they were non- conforming to LMCD regulations when the fact was that the Cannings were not. The applicants have hit the neighbors docks or boats in recent years and she expressed concern about how approval of a variance could further complicate the situation. Canning stated that there would be two problems associated with a marine railway system. First, the shoreline is riprapped and it would be difficult to run up near shore. Second, he expressed concern about how sand or grit on the rollers of the marine railway system could scratch the aluminum pontoons on his pontoon boat. He expressed concern about the aesthetics of storing a pontoon boat along shore utilizing a marine railway system. Foster stated that the marine railway might require the applicants to modify the existing riprapped shoreline. Mr. Judd Mowry, 445 Lakeview Avenue, suggested that the Board should not consider economics as a hardship when considering the variance application. Fos_ter stated that he concurred with the comment from Mr, Mowry. instead, the hardship in' the proposed vadance application would be converging lot lines. Babcock stated the pdmary problem associated with the variance application was buyer beware because no ordinances have changed over the years and the applicant could have researched the ordinances prior to purchasing the property. In reviewing variance requests,, he stated that he liked to consider what was reasonable for the neighbors. In the Canning vadance application, he did not believe it was reasonable because the granting of zero foot side setbacks, even with parallel side site lines, could create public safety problems. He believed this was the primary purpose for minimum side setback requirements and length restrictions, In the Canning situation, he believed requiring mutual consent was a better means to address the concern in the immediate area rather than granting a variance from Code. Nelson concurred with the comments of Babcock and expressed concem about setting an undesired precedent. BU~a COncurred with the. comments of Babcock and Nelson, If the variance was to be granted, he believed it would memorializing a historical privilege rather than a dght at the applicants' site. Foster stated that he bel eved ahardShip existed and that he would support Plan C. The Board might want to place a beam restr ction on the size of the boat to be stored at this site, possibly six feet, stored on a slide. Babcock stated that he had a concern about public safety relating to the 10' wide corridor for navigational purposes, especially on windy days - 1078- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 10, 2004 .... Page 12 MOTION: Babcock..moved, Nelson seconded to direct the attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for denial of the Miles and Pamela Canning variance application. VOTE: Ayes (9), Nayes (2, Foster and Skramstad); motion carded. The meeting was recessed at 9:41 p.m. and re-convened at 9:48 p.m. Thomas and Janet Tallakson, consideration of draft Findings of Fact and Order for denial of a dock length and adjusted dock use area variance application. Maple Hills Association, consideration of: 1) draft Findings of Fact and Order for denial of a length and adjusted dock use area variance application, and 2) pending new multiple dock license application. Skramstad asked for background on this agenda item from LeFevere. LeFevere stated that the draft Findings of Fact and Order to deny the two vadance applications and the Maple Hills Association new multiple dock license application were prepared from the staff memos and the minutes of the various meetings when the Board discussed' and considered the applications. The Board could approve the draft Findings as prepared or amend them accordingly because they are the Findings of the Board. MOTION: Babcock moved, Van Hercke seconded to approve, the draft Findings of FaCt and Order and Memorandum as submitted to denY the Tallakson and Maple Hills Association 'variance applications and to deny the Maple Hills Association new multiple dock license application. Canning stated that he Was unable to attend the BOard meetings in February and he asked for clarification on why draft Findings were originally Prepared for approval of the applications and then Findings were later prepared for denial of the applications. Babcock stated that he belie,~ed there were a number of Board m~mbers present at the 2/25/04 Regular Meeting who were r~ot present atthe 2/11/04 Regular Meeting. Foster Stated that he believed the Board would be makin'g mistake to deny the applications for a number of reasons.. These' reasons included: · The applicants were not well represented when the draft Findings for approval of the applications were considered by the Board at the 2/25/04 Regular Meeting. He did not recall th.(~ Board in the past either considering Findings for approval or denial of an applicatioh and the BOard changing its-mir~'d at a subsequent F~egulai~ Meeting'. · The City of Deephaven is strongly in favor of the applications because it would add shoreline to Burton Park. The proposed dock plan wouid comi~i'Y with the Ol~jective Code requirement of the LMCD, other than dock length rei:iuirementS', to b~end the dock over the wetial!_d'.' area He reminded the Board that the proposed dock plan would comply with the 1:50' General Rule. · He recently talked to John Baden from Three Rivers Park District regarding the difference between~the tribt]ta~ ordinance alid Wetland Pi-otection in back bays such as C.arsons Bay. He pointed Out that the tributaries have flowing water and that the back bay of Cars°ns Bay is much deeper compared to the tributaries, Which results in reduced prop dredging. The wetland area in - 1079- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 10, 2004 -- Page 13 question is already in a minimum wake are~ in Carsons Bay and Baden is equall'y concerned about high speed boat traffic in these wetland areas. · The back bay is primarily Burton Park and he believed there was a modest amount of boats being stored in this area. · He was not comfortable with denying the applications based on the 1974 policy because a sub- committee of the Board is currently reviewing it. He pointed out that one of the remedies in the 1974 policy was to establish a bay with minimum-wake speeds, which has already been done on Carsons Bay. · There are bays on Lake Minnetonka, such as Carsons Bay, that are more ideal for harboring of boats. This concept is not included in the 1974 policy that is being reviewed by the sub- committee. · He was not comfortable denying an application based on subjective criteria rather than objective criteria. · He encouraged the Board to allow the public to comment on this agenda item. Additionally, he encouraged the Board to vote against the motion and approve a subsequent motion to approve the applications as submitted. Babcock stated that he believed some of the fundamental principles were flawed. The applications are not contained within the 100' length restriction for the authorized dock use area for these sites. The 1:50' General Rule applies to good deep water sites and should not necessarily be applied to wetlands. This was his primary reason why he did not fundamentally support the nine Boat Storage Units (BSU's) at the Maple Hills Association site. He believed that prop dredgingin general is negative; however, the degree to which it is negative is subjective. He agreed that the 1974 policy needed to be revised, however, the opinions expressed by Foster might not be the consensus of the committee and a minodty opinion instead. Nelson asked Babcock whether his primary concern about the applications was the number of boat proposed or if it also included the length of the proposed docks. Babcock stated that he had concern about the length of the docks proposed, pointing out that he had recently voted against the recently approved variance on Seton Lake. He believed that market demands are requiring dock length variances and he was trying to determine where to draw the line. He expressed concern about approving a multiple dock facility approximately 250' from the 929.4' shoreline at the 1:50' density standard. Foster stated that he understood the concerns of Babcock requiring approving a dock over a wetland area that has less usable surface area than the amount of shoreline at elevation 929.4'. However, this concept is not reflected in the current Code and the Board might want to consider an ordinance change in the future. Babcock stated that he believed the 100' length restriction for the authorized dock use area at these sites was already in place that would allow the Board to place restrictions on density. Foster stated that if the Board would like to continue to improve water quality on Lake Minnetonka, one area to address would be the animal waste and phosphorus that is flowing in the tributaries from the communities to the west. Other means to improving water quality include improving water runoff from - 1080 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 10, 2004 _ -:7 __.. ._ .. -Page 14 hard surfaces and further restricting tw0-cyole motors. He reminded the Board of the approved legislation that placed further restrictio..ns on purchasing lawn fertilizers with phosphorous in it. Burma stated that. he was opposed to the applications at the 2/25/04 Regular IVleeting; however, he stated that he was inclined to change his vote. His reasons included that he believed the applicant has illustrated due diligence in Protecting the wetland area, that the applicant is allowed to reach navigable water, and that the applications comply with the 1:50' General Rule. He expressed concem about the Board restricting the number of boats subiectively. Van Hercke stated that she was an active member.of the Lake Minnetonka Boat density Sub-Committee. Although the 1974 policy was being reviewed and updated by the sub-committee, Carsons Bay was designated as critically dense in 1973. The sub-committee is reviewing and auditing the 1974 policy and one of the existing remedies in the policy was to limit or restrict multiple dock licenses. Although the MN DNR might prefer a seasonal dock over a wetland rather than dredging into it for docking purposes, this is a privilege rather than a right and the 1:50' General Rule does not necessarily need to apply to these applications. She expressed concern that the Maple Hills Association site was an outlot that would benefit a limited segment of the public. She proposed a 1:100' restriction at the Maple Hills Association site as a possible compromise to the 1:50' General Rule. She believed the 1974 .policy, whether or not it is amended, is a good policy to assist the .Board in its decision making process. Babcock stated that he recalled the Board placing a restriction on either the number of boats or size of boats when a dock was installed approximately 250' into the lake from the 929.4' shoreline, He believed that this occurred at the adjacent site where the Goetzs reside. Nybeck stated that although a length variance of 135' was granted to the Goetz site, there were no restrictions on the number and size of boats to be stored at this site. However, he pointed out that there were a number of residences on the back part of Carsons Bay that had approved variances with restrictions on the number of boats. In most of these cases, the approved density was more restrictive than the 1:50' General Rule. Halvorson stated that she had recently visited the area, pointing out that there was a significant amount of wetland and cattails. There currently was a small dock installed from these sites, and she eXpressed concern about a madna being installed in this area because it would not fit with the surroundings. She did not believe the bddge reconstruction was justification to increase the number of boats being stored at these sites. Foster discussed how he believed an outlot situation would be beneficial compared to the City of De~phaven replatt nga sedes of narrow lots with. individual docks over the wetland area in question. Althsugh he expressed concern about the size of boats in general on Lake Uinnetonka, he was not concerned about that on these sites because the bridge clearance-would restriction the size of the boats to be stored atthese docks. Van Hercke re-stated that the three primary concerns she' had were that Carsons Bay was critically dense based on the 1974 policy, that the 1:50' General Rule does not necessarily need to apply to the applicati.on$ because of.the.proposed dock lengths, and'the outtot proposed at the Maple Hills AS~ocia{j'on site - 1081 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting _. March 10,2004 -- - _ Page 15 Babcock re-stated that his primary concern was the nine BSU's proposed at the Maple Hills Association site. He estimated approximately 250' of useable surface area at the edge of the wetland area and he stated that he would consider supporting a reduced number of BSU's, such as four or five. However, he wa~ uncomfoff, abie about the Board considering a reduced number because the applicants have not amended their applications and they have not agreed to sign waiver forms to the 60-day rule. Scanlon questioned whether the back part of Carsons Bay was dense. Instead, he believed it becomes dense when it is combined with the remaining part of Carsons Bay north of the bridge. Foster concurred with the comments made by Scanlon. Canning stated that he would oppose the motion because he believed the proposed plan was reasonable. Knudsen stated that he had concern about setting an undesired precedent of allowing a 1:50' General Rule at other wetlands around the lake that require a dock length variance. He reminded the Board that the Board haS placbd restrictions on the number of boats in other approved dock length variance situations. He stated that he would be willing to support a reduced number of boats. Nelson asked if the homeowners association would have the right to request a permit for dredging to allow dOCkS to be stored with.i~,the authOr zed dock Use area for this site. Nybeck~tated that the permit request would be' with the MCWD; however, it is questionable whether it would g~t apprOved. He raiSed two past decisions by the LMCD to assist the Board in its decision making process. First, a dOck length variance was granted at Dancing Waters DOA (north site) in Halseads Bay in 1995. In this decision, the Board restricted the length of boats at this multiple dock from 32' to 24'. Second, the Board restricted the length of boats at a conforming facility at Fifth 'Street Ventures in Seton Lake in the last year. KnUdsen stated that he believed it would not be precedent to make subjective decisions in conjunction with requests for variance frOm Code. Mr. Ed Towey, 4635 .Maple Hill Drive, made the follow.ng comments: He Co~.men?d on,the process and other items.being discussed by the Board, noting that he was not PrePared or a/10wed to participate at the 2/25/05 Regular Meeting. He appreciated the opportunity to talk at this Regular Board Meeting. The proposed project wou d result in 100' of 929.4' shoreline at the: Tallakson site and 435' of 929.4' shorelineat the Maple Hills Assocation site. The MN DNR would prefer a seasonal dock rather than dredging. A number of Board members have communicated that theY would like to restrict the density of boats at this dock because it does not comply with Code. He questioned what the applicants were to do and he encouraged the Board to make' a'reason'able dbbision. He commented on outlets and stated:that thecurrent Code does not prohibit dock storage from them. He reminded the Board that there are three properties that have riparian dght~/including the Tallaksons, and the proposal would retain these riparian rights by allowing for a dock to extend beyohd.the vegetat on -1082- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 10, 2004 -- page 16 · He reviewed an alternative plan where the applicants could replat and ultimately store up_to 20 boats ~from these sites. He believed that this would b~ silly and that was a primary reason they have proposed a common dock for the homeowners association. · He stated that he believed the back bay does r~ot eXceed the density standards in the 1974 policy. He believed that this part of Cars0ns Bay was being considered for harborage and he believed it was ideal for that; - ° The MN DNR has communicated that they had no environmental'concerns with the proposed project, The back bay is completely full of milfoil'and he believed that boats in the back bay would improve the environmental Concerns that already exist, including a la~k of oxygen. · He stated that he did not underStand how the Board could no!~approve the Tallakson dock length variance application. At the minimum, he encouraged the BOard to approve a dock length vadance for the Tallakson site. · He entertained questions or comments. Ms. Klm Crockett, 17900 Shavers Lake, stated that she was a Deephaven City Council member. She was surprised to be at this meeting"because she originally believed that Fin~!pgs were be ng considered by the Board for approval rather than denial. The City of Deephaven sui~pOd~' the proposal because it would allow the city to transfer an unusable Parcel of land to the homeowners' ass°ciation. This land transfer would allow nine Deephaven residents to get access to Lake Minnetonka and Deephaven would get land to be added to Burton Park. This would result in a win-win situation because she. d d not believe the city council had any plan's to increase boa~ stOrage on the back bay:'; With the p~Ssible exCeption of canoes. The MN DNRand the CitYOf Minne[bnka recently con'si~'cted'"ihe new pUblic acceSs on Grays Bay to improve public access to Lake Minnetonka and she found it ironic that the Board was considering restricting access to Deephaven residents that already are lakesh0'ie'ownerS, althOUgh it is'an outlot situation:~ In:-cohclusion, the Deephaven'City couhcil recentiy voted unanimously to SUpPort the project and would 'like to proceed With VOTE: Ayes,(5; BabcOCk, HalvorSon, KnUdsen, Seuntjens, and Van Hercke), Nayes (7); motion failed. Foster stated that he wou d like the Board to re-consider the draft Findings 0[ Fact and Order for approval of the Tallakson and Maple Hill~ AssociatiOn vadance aPPlicati0n~ ihat were denied at the 2/25/04 Regular Board Meeting. MOTION: Foster moved, Nelson seconded (0 approve the Findings Of'Fact and Order for approval of the Tallakson and MaPle Hills. Association~variance' appiica~'ibns".as S:ubniiffed at the 2/25/04 Regular'Board Meetingl Nybeck stated{hat if-the ~Board was to.dbnside¢ apprOvin~ the motiOn, he recommended a friendly amendment;to include apprOVal of the Maple,HillS As~b(~ia'ti0n new mal!iple dock license application for the 2004 season. '.Foster and NelSon agreed t0~-this. ,~.. · ~ ~:., MOTION Babcock moved, Van Hercke'secoi~l~d to amend the original motion to reduce the number of TO BSU~s at the Maple HillS Association site from nine to flve'i ~": AMEND: · -- ~ , A number of Board members questioned whether it would tSe appropriate for ~he B~ard to vote on an ' 1083- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March '10, 2004 amended application that was not agreed to Dy the applicant. this on numerous occasions, _ page 17 LeFevere stated that the Board has-done VOTE ON Ayes (5; Babcock, Halvorson, Knudsen, Seuntjens, and Van Hercke), Nayes (7); amended ON MOTION motion failed. TO AMEND: VOTE ON Ayes (7), Nayes (Babcock, Halvorson, Knudsen, Seuntjens, and Van Hercke); original motion ORIGINAL approved. MOTION: The meeting was recessed at 11:13 p.m. and re-convened at 11:16 p.m. Howards Point Marina, consideration of 2004 renewal without change multiple dock license, commercial dock, and launching ramp application. Skramstad asked for background on this agenda item from Nybeck. Nybeck made the following comments: Mr. David Albrecht, President of Howards Point Madna, submitted a 2004 renewal without change application on 11/25/03 for its commercial dock and launching ramp. The facility is considered a legal, non-conforming facility because it is not contained within the authorized dock use area for this site and does not c,omp y w th the 1 50' General Rule. In 2003, the Board approved a cerise for the commercial dock and launching ramp with two conditions. These include: 1) no "off-lake" storage was allowed in the lot on the east ,side of Howards Point Road until approved bythe Board, consistent with Code Section 2.045; and 2) subject to all watercraft storage, including rental boats and installation of dock structure, being consistent with the approved site plan. He conducted an inspection of Howards Point Marina last June with Board member Skramstad to verify whether the facility was complying with these conditions. Dudng this inspection, the facility was found to be in non-compliance with license and Code requirements because of five discrepancies These included: 1) there continued to be unauthorized "off-lake" storage activity being Conducted in the parking lot on the east-side of Howards Point Road, 2) there were rental pontoons being stored in unauthorized locations on land, 3) there was unatuhroized dock structure installed on the south side of BSU 1 and the finger installed between BSU's 42. and 43 was 40' long rather than 30' that is approved, 4) there were a number of unauthorized pilings installed throughout the facility, and 5) there was an unauthorized temporary structure at the end of the main walkway near the gas dock for the temporary storage of personal watercraft. A second inspect on was conducted last September to check wh'ether HOwards Point Marina had addressed the five discrepancies observed in June. This inspection revealed that: 1) there continued to be unauthor zed "off,lake, storage being conducted in the parking lot on the east- side of Howards Point Road, 2) the rental pontoons were either being stored in authorized - locations or were being used, 3) the unauthorized dock structure near BSU's 1,42, and 43 had been addressed,. 4) there continued to;be a number of unauthorized pilings thrOUghout the facility, and 5) the temporary structure atthe endof the main walkway had been ~removed. ' Staff met with representatives of Howards Point madna last fall to di$(/usS hOW the.remaining - 1 084- Lake IVlinnetonka ConserVation District Regular Board Meeting March 10, 2004 Page 18 discrepancies observed in 2003 could be proposed and possibly approved by the Board for the 2003 season. Specifically, we discussed that it appeared that Howards Point Marina left some key details off the site plan they proposed in the winter of 1994/1995 when they made changes to their gas dock. Staff stated that these discrepancies would need to be proposed through a new application, with public hearing, pointing out that it had not been received to date. At the 1/14/04 Regular Meeting, the Board discussed whether there was a need 1:.o schedule a public hearing relating to the 2004 Howards Point Marina renewal without change commercial dock and launching ramp application. The Board at this meeting took no action and Board member Skramstad and Howards Point Marina expressed an interest in a possible application for a reduced number of "off-lake" storage BSU's. This meeting took place in the LMCD office on 2/26/04 and he believed Skramstad would update the Board on this meeting. By state law, the Board needs to take action at this meeting. Staff has recommended that Howards Point Marina either withdraw this application or sign a waiver of consent form, of which they have decided to do neither. He recommended the Board approve the 2004 Howards Point Marina renewal without change application for its commercial dock and launch ramp with three conditions. These included: 1) subject to removal of all unauthorized structure and pilings until approved by the Board, 2) subject to all watercraft being stored in authorized locations on the approved site plan, dated 11/2/94, and 3) the "off-lake" storage being conducted in the lot on the east side of Howards Point Road being discontinued. He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Skramstad summarized.the 2/26/04 meeting coordinated in the LMCD office with representatives of Howards Point Marina. The purpose of the meeting was to review whether Howards Point Madna was willing to submit an application for less than the 37 "off-lake" storage BSU's that they were denied by the Board last summer. Howards Point Marina was seeking approval from him and Nybeck at this meeting to continue "off-lake" storage in 2004. Skramtsad communicated that he and Nybeck did not have that authority because the Board reviews, debates, and votes on applications as a group. Howards Point Marina has proposed a three-step application process for 2004. First, they would like the Board to act on the 2004 renewal without change application. Second, a new application would be submitted in the near future for the discrepancies outlined earlier by Nybeck, excluding the "off-lake" storage activity. Third, Howards Point Marina has agreed to work in earnest to resolve the "off-lake" storage issue, including the need to submit an application. The Board should recognize that it would be likely that "off-lake" storage would be conducted this boating season while Howards Point Madna was resolving the third step. He. asked for additional comments on the 2/26/04 meeting from Nybeck. Nybeck commented that he would like to have Howards Point Madna resolve the "off-lake" storage issue as soon as possible and that the Board might want to consider establishing a deadline. The Board and the applicant discussed a number of items relating to the 2004 renewal without change commercial dock and launching ramp application. Some of these included: 1) the recommendation of staff to approve the 2004 renewal without change application, including the three conditions, 2) voluntary' compliance versus criminal prosecution, 3) the position that Howards Point Marina does not believe that the activity qualifies as "off-lake" storage, 4) how to deal with the unauthorized dock structure, including the personal watercraft ramp, observed by LMCD staff during inspection in 2003, and 5) whether the Board wOuld still have the opportunity to schedule a public headng in 2004 if the unauthorized "off-lake" storage activity continues and an application is not submitted by Howards Point Madna for consideration -1085' C Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 10, 2004' - Page 19 by the Board. Foster stated that he Would agree to apProve the 2004 renewal without change application, provided the applicant comPlies with the three conditions outlined in the 3/5/04 staff memo and they submit the necessary application(s) within 60 days to address these conditions. Babcock asked what would happen if Howards Point Marina does not comply with these conditions. LeFevere stated that the Board should have the expectation that Howards Point Madna would bdng this facility in compliance with Code and license requirements, tt is conceivable that the applicant could be in violation of the Code for "off-lake" storage when the facility opens for the 2004 boating season. An option for the Board to consider to address this would be to notify Howards Point Marina that a public hearing was being scheduled for a' possible license revocatio~i~:~)r(Jceeding. If'the BOard Would like to consider an approval of the renewal without change application for the 2004 season with the. conditions recommended by staff, the BOard could hold off enforcement in advance of the illegal structure for.a period of days to allow the applicant to submit an application. He recommended that 30 days might be appropriate. MOTION: Foster moVed, Babcock seconded to approve the 2004 Howards Point Madna renewal without change application for its comm'ercial dock and launching ramp, subject to the applicant complying With the three conditions outlined in the staff memo, dated 315104, and the Board agreeing to hold off enforcement relating to the unauthorized structure and pilings provided the applicant submits a neW application for consideration by t6e Board within 30 days. Babcock expressed his frustration that there were violations obsei'ved by staff during inspections in 2003. If inspections continue to exist in 20041 he stated that he wObld like to have the ability to rescind the motion. He stated that Howards Point Marina is licensed for a specific number and it is their responsibility to manage the facility within this specific number. Foster stated that he agreed with Babcock and that LeFevere has communicated that the Board could schedule a public hearing fOr license revocation if that Occurs during, the 2004 season. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. G. Additional Business. There was no additional business. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE Curfman Trucking and Repair, Inc., consideration of maintenance proposal for the 2004 EWM Harvesting Program.. Skramstad asked for background on this agenda item from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that a maintenance proposal has been received from Curfman Trucking and Repair, Inc. for the 2004 EWM Harvesting Program. Curfman Trucking and Repair, Inc. has served as the fleet - 1 086- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 10, 2004 _ -- --' Page 20 mechanic for the past three harvesting seasons and significant improvements have been made to the equipment. The proposal is for a flat rate contract of $26,250 fOr a 22 week season from April 15th thro6gh September 15th, the same rate as 2003. He recommended the Board authorize the 2004 contract to Curfman Trucking and Repair, Inc. to serve as the 2004 EWM Harvesting Program Fleet Mechanic. MOTION: Foster moved, Skramstad seconded to direct staff to prepare a contractual agreement with Curl:man Trucking and Repair, Inc. to serve as 2004 EWM Harvesting Program Fleet Mechanic, for an amount of $26,250.00. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. B.. 2004 Zebra Mussel Project, consideration of State of Minnesota Income Contract. Skramstad asked for background on this agenda item from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that a draft State of Minnesota Income Contract was received from the MN DNR for the 2004 zebra mussel inspection program project. The program would be for peak period inspections from mid May through mid September during peak times on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays at five selected public accesses. Maximum hours would be 2,200 with a maximum cost of $27,500. He recommended Board approval of the draft contract to get the 2004 program initiated. The Board briefly discussed how the program would be funded in 2004. - MOTION: Foster moved, Canning seconded to approve the State of Minnesota Income Contract for the 2004 zebra mussel watercraft inspection program. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously, Nelson briefly updated the work that he and Suerth had been recently working on regarding a more comprehensive program in 2005 and beyond. He stated that a power point presentation would be finalized and reviewed by the Board at the 3/24/04 Regular Meeting. C, Additional Business, There was no additional business. 3. FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers (3/1/04 - 3/15/04). Knudsen reviewed the audit of vouchers as submitted. MOTION: Foster moved,. Halvorson seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. - 1 087- C Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting March 10, 2004 C. Staff update on LMCD investments. Page 21 Skramsta~l asked Nybeck for an update on this agenda item. Nybeck provided a general summary of how the LMCD currently invests its funds. This includes a number of certificate of dePosits, a pass book saving account, a cash management account with Merrill Lynch, and a checking account. He stated that he believed this could be done more efficiently through a 4M account that is set up through the League of Minnesota Cities. If the Board would like to make this change, he recommended the Board approve LMCD Resolution 108 that would authorize the LMCD to become a member of the 4M Fund. MOTION: Skramstad moved, Foster seconded to adopt LMCD Resolution 108 that authorizes membership in the 4M Fund. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. D. Additional Business. There was no .additional business. 4. LAKE USE & RECREATION A. Consideration of staff recommendation to award a contract for the 2004 Lake Minnetonka Boat Density and User Attitude Surveys. Skramstad asked Nybeck for background on this agenda item. Nybeck made the following comments: · He worked closely with Tim Kelly from the MN DNR for the Bo.at Density and User Attitude Surveys that are planned for Lake Minnetonka in 2004. A RFP request was sent out to potential contractors in January with proposals due in the LMCD office on 2/t2/02. · The total budget for the project is $50,000, with proposals received from Schoell and Madson, Inc., Shaffer Aviation, Inc., and ThomTech Design, Inc. at or below the budgeted amount. He and Kelly reviewed these proposals on 2/17/04 and subsequent interviews were conducted in the LMCD office on 2/27/04. Amended proposals were received from Schoell and Mads0n, inc. and Thom Tech Design, Inc. after these .interviews. · After a final consultation with Kelly on the original and amended proposals, he recommended that the Board authorize.the Chair, on behalf of the Board, to enter into a contractual agreement with ThomTech Design, inc., in the a, mq~nt of $47,500.00., to conduct the 2004 Lake Minneto'~ika Boat DenSitY and User Attitude Surveys. · Although Shaffer Aviation, Inc. has submitted a lower proposal, $45,000.00, he andKelly had a concern about whether they had assembled a team necessary to adequately meet our expectations on the survey component of the 2004 project. He believed that'ThomTech Design, Inc. was more experienced and qualified to meet the expectaiions of the LMCD based on past experiences of the MN DNR with this contractor. He pointed out that because [[iec~:nti'act is a service contract, public bidding is not required and the LMCD is not obligated to accept the lowest bidder. - 1 088- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular'Board Meeting March 10, 2004 Page22 · He entertained questions or comments from the Board, MOTION: Foster moved, Burma seconded to authorize the Chair, on behalf of the Board, to enter into a contractual agreement with ThomTech Design, Inc., in the amount of $47,500,00, to conduct the 2004 Lake Minnetonka Boat Density and User Attitude Surveys. · VOTE: MOtiOn carried unanimously. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 5. ADMINISTRATION There was no discussion. 6. SAVE THE LAKE There was no discussion, 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Nybeck stated that he had two items to bring to the Board's attention. First, there was a letter in the packet from Pat Chelmo that thanked the Board for recognizing him with the 2004 Special Deputy at the annual banquet dinner in February. Second, he bdefly updated the BOard on progress being made to find a replacement for Karen Anderson, Administrative Secretary for the LMCD, who has resigned and her last day is 3/19/04. The position has been advertised with a closing date of 3/15/04. There has been a significant interest in this position by the Public based on the applicatiOn packets sent out and the applications received to date. He stated that he hoped to make a recommendation at one of the two Regular Board Meetings in April on a replacement for Anderson. 8. OLD BUSINESS MOTION: Scanlon moved to allow the Lake Minnetonka COmmunications CommiSsion to tape future Regular Board Meetings. The motion failed for lack of a second. Nybeck stated that Lake Mi'nnetonka Communications Commission Station Manager Jim Lundberg was tentatively scheduled to address this topic at the 3/24/0~. Regular LMCD Board Meeting. 9. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting-~vaS adjourned at 12:20 p.m, - 1089- C Lake Minnetonka Conservation District RegularBoard Meeting. March 10, 2004 Tom Skramstad, Chair Jose Valdesuso, Secretary Page 23 CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, March 24, 2004 Tonka Bay City Hall CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Skramstad READING OF MINUTES. 3/10/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting (handout) PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. t WATER STRUCTURES A) Miles and Pamela Canning, discussion of 3/12/04 letter received withdrawing their dock length and adjusted dock use area variance application; B) (*) Dancing Waters DOA (Channel, North, Peninsula, South), staff recommends the Board approve a motion to refund a $403.00 deposit for 2004 renewal, without change, multiple dock license applications; c) (*) 2004 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends Board approval of 2004 renewal, without change, applications for Jennings Cove Dock Association, City of Minnetonka Beach, Minnetonka Portable Dredging; D) Additional Business; ADMINISTRATION A) Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission, discussion with Station Manager Jim Lundberg on the possibility of taping LMCD Regular Board Meetings; B) Training session for Board members on Open Meeting Law; C) Additional Business; FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (3/16/04 - 3/31/04); B) (*) February financial summary and balance sheet;, C) Additional Business; - 1091 - C 4. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE A} Review of proposed zebra mussel power pOint presentation; B) Additional Business; 5, LAKE USE & RECREATION 6. SAVE THE LAKE 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9, NEW BUSINESS 10. ADJOURNMENT C - 1092- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE AGENDA 8:30 A.M., Friday, April 9,'2004 LMCD Office 18338 Minnetonka Blvd., Deephaven 1. Introductions 'and Welcome. 2. Review of Minutes from the 2/13/04 meeting. 3. Discussion of proposed LMCD containment plan for Lake Minnetonka to prevent the introduction of zebra mussels and other exotics species. 4. Agency Reports. 5. Area wide lake association reports. 6. Old business. 7.' New business. 8. Adjournment. -1093- Xar 15 2A04 18:58:18 Via Pax & Il, 95Z4?ZBGZO Adminis'crator Page BS1 0£ 887. C A new tax deduction -FridayFax- If you follow transportation or public safety issues at the Minnesota Capitol, you have probably run into Anne Finn, of the LMC staff. This morning at 4:26 a.m. Anne gave birth to Connor Finn Junker. Mother, father, brother and new son are doing well but understandably, Anne will be out of the capitol scene for a while. The IGR staff wishes her well! In the meantime, if you have questions on transportation or public safety issues, contact any other member of the IGR staff. A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities March 19, 2004 Page 1 We believe that more details on the House plan will emerge soon. House leaders have announced that they will set budget targets early next week. They also plan to unveil their six major finance bills shortly thereafter with a goal of passing those bills through the committee process and to the floor by the end of March. But don't get your hopes up for an early adjournment. The Senate does not appear to be moving as quickly. House supplemental budget unveiled On Wednesday, the House Majority Caucus began unveiling their plan to balance the state's projected $160 million budget shortfall for the current 2004- 2005 legislative biennium. In addition to solving the state's projected deficit, the House proposal also includes approximately $40 million in new spending, although all of the plan's details have not been fully ironed out. Similar to the governor's proposed supplemental budget, the House solves the state's budget deficit without making any additional cuts in city aid programs. The House plan also avoids tapping the state's $631 million budget reserve. Although the plan does not increase any taxes, it does include a controversial racetrack-casino proposal that will generate an additional $30 million in annual revenues for the state. The plan also adopts a governor's recommendation to require upfront payment of sales tax for car leases, which accelerates the collection of an extra $36 million in sales tax revenue. The House plan also mirrors the governor's proposal to replace the sales tax on cigarettes with a gross receipts tax collected from distributors. Although this change is purportedly being done to increase tax compliance, it does have a negative impact on those cities with local sales taxes. Liability and volunteers HF 2436 (Abler, R-Anoka) is a bill providing authority for local governments in public health emergencies will come before the House Local Government committee on Tuesday for a vote. Troublesome language has been added to this bill that would increase a government's liability when volunteers are involved in a public health emergency. The language in sections 3-5 would limit the cities' ability to use official immunity to defend the actions of volunteers. This particular language is brought forward by the MN Trial Lawyers Phone calls or emails to committee members on the State and Local Government committee would be helpful. The message is that section five should be deleted. Overall, it's a good bill as it extends the public health emergency isolation and quarantine provisions of MS chapter 402 (2002) which were set to sunset on August 1, 2004. The Senate version, SF 2512 (Lourey, DFL- Kerrick), is expected to be heard multiple times in the next two weeks as many committee chairs have asked for it. As of Friday morning, the bill did not have the troublesome language on it. The House version has already been heard in most of the committees. Because it hasn't quite made the committee deadline, it will be brought through House and Senate Rules committee at some point. For more information contact Jenn O'Rourke at 651.281.1261 or iorourke@lmnc, or~. For more information on oily legislative issues, contacl any m~rnbe~' of the League of Minneaola Cities Inlergovetnmenlal Relations team. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1094- Mar 19 ZBB4 1B:SB:53 Via Fax -> 95247ZBGZB ~ninis~ra~o~ ~age BBZ Of BBZ - Frid ay Fax - A wee/dy legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities AR_MR proposals move forward This week, the Senate State and Local Government committee passed SF 2273 (Sen. Wergin, R- Princeton), a bill that impacts municipal planning and zoning fees'and land dedications. The bill was a mended to reflect a compromise reached between ARMR and the League of Minnesota Cities, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and the Municipal Legislative Commission. The agreement includes a provision that requires a municipality to explain the basis for its fees upon request and requires a challenge to a fee in Minn. Stat. 462.353 t° be brought within 60 days after approval of an application. A municipality must also establish the basis for calculating a land dedication by ordinance and may not condition approval on an agreement to waive the right to challenge the fee in lieu of dedication if provided written notice of a dispute over a fee in lieu of dedication before a final decision on an application. This compromise bill passed the House Local, Government committee last week. Both bills now go before the full House and Senate for a vote. The League and other local government representatives have continued to advocate for changes that moderate the three remaining ARMR proposa Is. We support amending ARMR's bill regulating building moratoria to allow an extension for a specified period beyond the time needed to comply with a process or approval required by state statute, federal law or court order. This bill, SF 2274 (Sen. Vickerman, DFL-Tracy), is scheduled for a hearing in the Senate State and Local Government committee on Monday, March 22. The companion bill, HF 2021 (Rep. Buesgens, R-Jordan) is awaiting a floor vote in the House. March 19, 2004 Page 2 allowing a non-con forming use to continue into perpetuity. While HF 2057 (Rep. Abrams, R- Minnetonka) was amended in a House committee to clarify that a non-conforming uae cannot expand without municipal approval, the bill still includes a provision eliminating a city's ability to require that a substantially damaged non-conforming use rebuild under current zoning requirements. The House bill is awaiting consideration on the floor. The Senate companion, SF 2251 (Sen. Scheid, DFL-Br°°klyn Park), will likely be heard next week in the 'State and Local Government committee. We have also expressed concerns that ARMR's eminent domain bill will make it much more difficult for cities' port authorities, EDA~ and HRAs to perform statutory development and redevelopment functions. The provision requiring a higher standard of proof to sustain a taking in situations where the acquired property is transferred to a private entity would essentially remove local deference and move what has traditionally been a municipal legislative decision into the judicial realm. LMC is encouraging legislators to instead consider an approach that amends redevelopment statutes to address the degree of public benefit associated with these types of projects. The House bill, HF 1901 (Rep. Paulsen, R-Eden Prairie), is scheduled for a hearing in the Transportation Finance committee on Wednesday, March 24. The Senate State and Local Government committee has not yet set a hearing on the companion bill, SF 2037 (Sen. Kiscaden, IP- Rochester). The League has argued that the changes proposed in ARMR's non-conforming use bill would undermine implementation of comprehensive plans by For more [nformalion on city legialaliv,~ issues, conlacl any m~mber of the l..~ague of Minnesota C[lies Intergovernmental Relations team. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1095- C C Xa~ ZG Z004 ~?:30:40 Via Fax -> 95Z4?ZBGZ8 A~inis~r~or 881 0£ 889 Water quality bills advance -FridayFax- SF 1999 (Sparks, DFL-Austin) removes the sunset date on the ban on phosphorus in lawn fertilizers and extends the ban statewide and was passed to the Senate floor. Appropriate soil test results will continue to allow use of phosphorus fertilizers. LMC has a policy position supporting the removal of phosphorus from all possible consumer products to lessen city cost of treating wastewater and stormwater and supported the bill Its companion bill, HF 2005 (McNamara, R-Hastings) has also been passed to the floor in that body. A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities March 26, 2004 Page 1 Roseville) includes the policy language related to creating a state impaired waters program that was crafted over the past year by a large and diverse stakeholder group that included local representatives, including LMC and CGMC. It funds impaired waters program needs by raising state income and corporate income taxes to generate $100 million per year. That bill was passed to the Finance committee. SF 2319 (Lourey, DFL-Kerrick) initially allowed the state to do extensive groundwater monitoring at sites where biosolids are applied to land and to bill back their costs without limit to the source of the biosolids and was opposed by LMC. The author amended her bill to address those concerns by making it a one-time appropriation to the MPCA from the state to do monitoring ora specific site in her district. That Version was passed to the Senate Finance committee. The companion file HF 2318 (Hilty, DFL-Finlayson) was not given a hearing before the policy committee deadline. Two bills supplying funding to help cities address the requirements coming their way from federal impaired waters and TMDL programs made their way forward in the Senate. SF 401 (Sams, DFL-Staples) is a bill for a constitutional amendment that would dedicate ~A of one cent of the state sales tax for the next twenty years to fund game and fish, wildlife, parks and traiN, and impaired waters programs. It allocates approximately $51 million per year to the state's impaired waters program. It has been passed to the Senate Finance committee. SF2889 (Marry, DFL- Inverse condemnation A bill opposed by LMC and other local government organizations was tabled in the Senate Judiciary committee on Thursday evening. SF 1233 (Ortman, R-Chanhassen) would have changed condemnation law to allow garbage haulers to sue cities for loss of business if organized collection is enacted. Heather Worthington, city administrator for the city of Falcon Heights testified on behalf of the League and provided the committee with information on her city's efforts to consider organized waste collection and the economic obstacles the bill would create. The initial bill (and the current House version) was drafted to include any business, not just garbage haulers, but the only businesses testifying in support of the bill have been from the solid waste industry. The House companion (HF 898 (Thissen, DFL-Minneapolis) has passed all of its required policy committees and is on the floor, so there is still a risk that the language will show up as an amendment to another bill. Open meeting law changes A bill allowing public meetings to be closed for the purposes of having security discussions moved forward in the Senate this week. SF 2343 (Higgins, DFL-Minneapolis) was drafted by Hennepin County and LMC. It was For more informalion on city legislative iasues, conical any m~mber of the L.,~ague of Minne'`ota Cilie'` Inlergovernm~nlal Relation., team. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1096- Hat ZG ZBB4 17:3i:Z3 gia Fax -> 952472BGZB ~&minis~a~o~ ~age 80Z 0£ 883 -FridayFax- changed somewhat to address concerns about record retention by the Minnesota Newspaper Association and was included in the Senate's omnibus data practices bill. The House has not yet acted on this language, but is expected to be receptive to the request. The chair of the House Judiciary policy committee, Rep. Steve Smith, is the author of the House companion bill, HF 2138. A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities March 26, 2004 Page 2 ignores the inflationary increases on the expenditure side. They argued that the net impact of these short-term budget fixes was to push a large portion--perhaps as much as $1 billion--of the state's deficit into the future. They raised similar concerns about the recent supplemental budget proposals offered the governor and the House that they believe rely too heavily on "shifts and gimmicks." Electronics recycling SF 838 (Higgins, DFL-Minneapolis) sets up a recycling program for cathode ray tubes in televisions and video display screens. The Senate Environment, Agriculture, and Economic Development Finance division passed it on Tuesday. It is not clear at this time what, if any, action the House will take on HF 882 (Cox, R-Northfield) now that the Senate has moved the bill forward. Gunyou, Kiedrowski address joint Senate Finance and Tax hearing Today, former Finance Commissioners Jay Kiedrowski and John Gunyou appeared before a joint session of the Senate Finance committee and the Senate Tax committee "to have and honest discussion about the fiscal management and future of the state." The two former commissioners appeared to tell committee members that the legishture and governor should regain control of the state budget not through recently-employed accounting shifts or use of one-time revenues but instead through permanent adjustments to spending or taxes. Specifically, the commissioners cited last year's use of one-time money and the fact that the updated forecast includes inflationary increases in the estimates for revenues but Jay Kiedrowski was the finance commissioner under former Governor Rudy Perpich who now works for Wells Fargo Bank and John Gunyou who was the finance commissioner under Governor Arne Carlson is now the city manager for the city of Minnetonka. Both appeared before the committee not to represent their current employers but as citizens and former finance commissioners. The impact of the hearing on the discussions on the deficit will play out over the next several weeks as the legislature moves beyond policy committees and into the finance committee activity. Eminent domain proposal still alive On Thursday, the House Transportation Finance committee heard HF 1901 (Paulsen, R- Eden Prairie), a bill that would require cities to pay property owners' attorney fees in a condemnation proceeding in certain circumstances and require cities to prove by a preponderance of evidence that a taking serves a public purpose. The bill was previously amended in the House Local Government committee to allow the award of attorney fees to a landowner in an eminent domain proceeding if the final judgment or award exceeds by 20 percent or For more information on city legislative issues, contact any n-~mber of Ihe League of Minnesota Cities Intergovernmemal Relal/ons learn. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1097- 9524?ZBGZO ~ninis~ra~or ~age 883 0£ 883 more thc last writtcn offer made by thc condemning authority before filing a petition. The amendment also established a heightened standard of proof for takings transferred to a private entity. Under thc proposed language, thc acquiring authority must prove by preponderance of thc evidence that thc taking is reasonably necessary and authorized by law, and is for a public, not private, purpose. -FridayFax- A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities March 26, 2004 Page 3 worked with both sides over the last several weeks to negotiate a compromise proposal The League testified against the bill in the Transportation committee, arguing that these proposed changes to the condemnation process would encourage more litigation that will delay resolution of condemnation cases and cost taxpayers more for public projects, and would make it much more difficult for cities, port authorities, EDAs and HRAs to perform statutory development and redevelopment functions. After testimony for and against the proposal, the committee tabled the bill. The committee later amended the public purpose provision into HF 2625 (Kuisle, R-Rochester), the department of transportation land management bill. The League and other local government groups proposed a more reasonable approach that amends redevelopment statutes to address the degree of public benefit associated with these types of projects. The amendment failed on a voice vote, and the committee voted to send HF 2625, as amended, to the House Ways and Means committee. At a hearing in thc Senate Judiciary committee, Sen. Kiscaden presented a delete-all amendment to the original bill that exempted small strip takings from the attorney fee provision and limited the payment of attorney fees to a maximum of $2,000 for residential property. The amendment also attempted to tighten up the public purpose requirements. The Judiciary committee ultimately voted to remove the attorney fees provisions, but passed the rest of the bill and referred it to the State and Local Government committee. The Senate State and Local Government committee took-up SF 2037 today. Sen. Klscaden was prepared to offer a compromise proposal that would have moderated the public purpose requirements in the bill, but the proponents and opponents had not reached final agreement on the language. She instead moved to strike the public purpose section of the bill and send the amended bill to the Senate Transportation Policy and Budget Division. The committee adopted the motion. It's likely that this issue will be resolved one way or another in negotiations on HF 2625 (Kuisle) and SF 2643 (Murphy). While the League remains concerned about the impacts of the House language on economic development and redevelopment projects, things are looking better in the Senate. Sen. Shells Kiscaden (IP-Rochester), the author of the Senate companion bill (SF 2037) has For more information on city lel;ialative issues, conlacl any member of the Lea~;ue of Minnesola Cities Inler~overnmenlal Relation,: learn. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1098- ~pr fl2 2flf14 1G:55:1B ~ia Fax -> 95247ZflGZfl A&~inis~ra~or Page 801 Of - Frid ay Fax - A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities Senate Tax Committee considers LGA bills On Wednesday, the Senate Tax Committee considered three broad bills that would attempt to restore a portion of the 2003 cuts to LGA. The bills considered included S.F. 2100, offered by Senator Tom Bakk (DFL-Cook), SF 2873 offered by Senator Keith Langseth (DFL-Glyndon) and S.F. 3006, authored by Senator Ann Rest (DFL- New Hope). The Bakk bill would each restore $60 million of the 2003 LGA cuts by making $20 million of the 2003 city MVI-IC cuts permanent, redirecting $20 million in transit funding and using $20 million of one-time state resources. In addition, the bill would repeal the 2003 law change that added taconite aid to the LGA formula. That provision would begin phasing-in with the 2005 aid distribution and would have the effect of reducing LGA to cities receiving taconite distributions. Senator Langseth's bill, SF 2873 would restore approximately $45 million of the 2003 LGA cuts by reinstating the transit property tax levy, creating a new transit aid program and permanently extending the MVI-IC cuts for cities over 1,500 population. The transit tax would be reinstated within those metropolitan and greater Minnesota areas that were subject to the transit tax prior to the 2001 transit levy takeover by the state. The newly-imposed transit levy would be reduced or in some communities entirely offset via a new transit aid program that would target aid to those areas with permanent LGA and MVHC cuts in excess of 4 percent of the city's net tax capacity. The new transit aid would offset all but approximately $25 million of the transit levy, which then allows $25 million in state resources to be used for additional LGA funding. Senator Rest's proposal, SF 3006, would restore $50 million of the 2003 LGA cuts without Aprit 2, 2004 Page 1 designating a specific funding source and similar to the Bakk bill, would eliminate the taconite aid addition to the LGA formula. The Rest bill reflects the League's position last year that city aids not be disproportionately cut to solve the state's budget deficit. The $50 million increase in the LGA appropriation would roughly make the 2003 cut to LGA proportional to the overall LGA appropriation. Moorhead Councilmember Lauri Winterfeldt- Shanks and Moorhead City Manager Brace Messelt testified in support of the Langseth Bill and St. Cloud Mayor John Ellenbecker testified in support of the Bakk bill. The League testified in support of the restoration of LGA and in support of the repeal of the taconite addition to the LGA formula contained in the Bakk and Rest bills, but expressed concerns about the funding mechanisms in SF 2100 and SF 2873. Tax Committee Chair Larry Pogemiller (DFL- Minneapolis) expressed to the committee his deep concerns about the magnitude of the LGA cuts enacted last year and his strong desire to find some way to restore a portion of those cuts. The Tax Committee will begin marking up their omnibus bill within the next few weeks and we are hopeful that some LGA restoration may be included in the Senate bill. Senate unveils their plan for the rest of session Early Friday afternoon the Senate DFL leadership held a press conference to describe their plan for balancing the $160 million state budget deficit and to discuss what the rest of the session might hold. During the press conference, several references were made to the fact that local governments (cities, counties, and school districts) took large hits last year which led to a discussion on the Senate's proposed additional For mote information on city legislative issues, contacl any m~mbet of lhe I.~ague of Minnesota Cities Inletgovetnn~ntal Relalions learn. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 - 1099- ~ OZ Z004 1B:SG:OZ ~a ~ax 952472867-8 fld~inix~cra~or Page 882 fl£ 883 C C cuts to state agencies in the way of assistant and deputy commissioners. - Frid ay Fax- A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities April 2, 2004 Page 2 Senate advances county plat approval compromise Senate DFL leadership also laid out their plan for the omnibus bills. Traditionally these are the bills that dominate the activity at the Capitol during the end of session. The Senate will begin constructing four omnibus bills--one addressing the deficit, one including the finance recommendations of all committees, one dealing with taxes and a fourth that will contain bonding recommendations--beginning next Monday morning. The budget deficit bill and the finance bill will be voted on before the Easter/Passover break, which will start Thursday, and will likely be merged into one bill on the Senate floor. The Senate plan will include several revenue- raising provisions included in the proposals offered by the governor and the House majority, including the up-front payment of sales tax on car leases (5;36 million) and a provision to apply the cigarette sales tax at the wholesale level (5;11 million). In addition, the Senate plan will include provisions to "close corporate loopholes" that will raise nearly 5;58 million and a 5% cut to state agencies which would include reductions in top agency management positions and leave each agency with one deputy commissioner. The Senate plan does not include a Racino proposal, nor does it raise taxes or tap state budget reserves. In total, the Senate plan erases the state's 5;160 million deficit and actually leaves 5;30 million that will be used to fund yet- to-be- identified priorities. In the House, leadership is progressing with multiple bills dealing with the budget with each budget committee sending their own bill to the floor for consideration where they have been debating them this week. This week the Senate Transportation Policy and Budget Division adopted a compromise proposal that addresses concerns raised by county officials relating to proposed plats that abut county roads. The committee previously heard SF 2600 (Ourada, R-Elk River), but had laid the bill over for further discussion. Prior to the second hearing, city and county groups negotiated a compromise that requires developers to submit information regarding "plat roadway elements" to the county engineer at least 30 days before submitting the preliminary plat to the city. Under the agreement, "plat roadway elements" include the portions of a plat relating to right-of- way land dedicated to highway purposes, drainage and highway access control. The proposal also requires a city to enter the county engineer's or commissioner of transportation's comments on the record at the public hearing on the subdivision application. The counties dropped provisions that would have repealed municipal consent and required county approval of a preliminary plat. While there was general agreement between the cities and counties on this approach, the builders expressed concerns that the new language would essentially extend the plat review process by at least 30 days. Sen. Ortman (R-Chanhassen) offered an amendment to start the clock at the time that a developer submits the plat roadway elements to the county. This amendment would have left cities less time to review and approve a preliminary plat. The committee voted down the builders' amendment and approved the compromise language as an amendment to SF 2557. FoP more info~malion on city legi,qalive issues, conlacl any member of lhe League of Minnesola Ciliea Intergovernmental Relations team. 651,281.1200 or 800.925.1122 -1100- ~pr 8Z Z804 1G:SG:45 Vi~ Fax -> 9524?ZBGZO ~&ninis~ra~or ~ge B09 0£ 88~ - Frid ay Fax - Last week, the House Transportation Finance committee heard the House companion bill, HF 1913 (Kuisle, R-Rochester). While the author proposed the city and counties' compromise proposal, the committee adopted the builders' amendment to include the submission to the county engineer within the 120-day preliminary plat approval limit. The amended bill was sent to the House Rules committee. A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities April 2, 2004 Page 3 reverse blight and limit opportunities for businesses to expand and create jobs. Eminent domain provision still alive Legislation that would significantly limit cities' ability to conduct redevelopment was forwarded last week to the House Ways and Means committee. The language was added as an amendment to HF 2625 (Kuisle, R- Rochester), a Department of Transportation bill. The provision would require cities to prove by a preponderance of evidence that a taking for redevelopment serves a public purpose. This is one of four proposals being advanced by the Alliance for Reasonable Municipal Regulation (ARMR), a group comprised of auto dealers, realtors, builders and other business groups. I-Iowever, it is unclear how broad the support is for this proposal since several cities have recently heard from builders who have concerns about the impacts of the public purpose requirements on development. The League of Minnesota Cities testified against the preponderance of evidence standard, arguing that the proposed changes would limit the availability of eminent domain as a tool for legitimate public purposes. LMC noted that the amendment would make it much more difficult and costly for cities, port authorities, EDAs and HRAs to perform statutory development and redevelopment functions. In effect, these changes would substantially limit the ability to The League, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and the Municipal Legislative Commission instead offered a proposal that would balance the rights of property owners to challenge a taking and the authority of local elected officials to carry out projects that are part of a community vision. However, this compromise amendment failed on a voice vote, and HF 2625, as amended, was sent to the House Ways and Means committee. The League and other groups have encouraged the Senate to consider this compromise language. Last week, Sen. Kiscaden was prepared to offer the compromise proposal, but when the proponents and opponents had not reached final agreement on the language, she instead moved to strike the public purpose section from SF 2037. The bill passed as amended and was referred to the Senate Transportation Policy and Budget Division. The Senate Transportation committee met yesterday and adopted an amendment to SF 2557 (Murphy, DFL-Red Wing) that would make additional changes to the appraisal process for property subject to condemnation for transportation purposes. While the committee did not move any amendments relating to the preponderance of evidence standard for redevelopment takings, the issue could still surface in the Finance committee or on the Senate floor. Please contact your state legislators to share your concerns about these proposed changes to eminent domain. You can find contact information for your representative by visiting the Minnesota Legislature's website at ~vww,lee,sta te.,m ri.us. For more informalion on cily leg/slalive issues, conlact any member of Ihe League of Minnesota Cities lnlergovernmenlal Relations learn. 651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122 -1101 - The Gillespie Gazette VOL XII NO 4 C April- 2004 Dear Members and Friends, Our membership keeps growing and growing and many people have asked the "who, what, where, when and how" of our operations. It's probably always a good idea to explain ourselves each year in, hopefully, a fairly brief manner. Our organization has been in existence since 1960 when the group was organized under Senior Community Services as the Upper Tonka North Shore Senior Club. In 1976 we became the Mound Senior Citizens Club and in 1980 became the Westonka Senior Citizens, Inc and opened our Westonka Senior Center. The next year we formed the West0nka Senior Citizens Foundation as a way of raising funds for the future generations of senior citizens.. All of the world seemed to fall apart in 1999 when the building our senior center was housed in was tom down, but, then the rainbow began to shine. First of all, we were warmly welcomed into the beautiful facilities at St John's Lutheran Church in Mound and made to feel like we were part of their family. When we left two years later to move into our Gillespie Center, we did so with a twinge of sadness. St. John's staff and congregation will always be in our hearts and memory for those years of love and care. Then the most unbelievable miracle happened with a phone call from Roger Reed to tell us that he had someone in his office that was interested in helping to build a new center. Our Foundation President, Pat MeiseI.went into the office and was surprised with the generous gift offer from a lifetime resident, Bill Gillespie, Bill's gift from the Giltespie Family Fund of the Minneapolis Foundation was special in that it was a match of five to one to gifts from all of us. The total cost of $3.5 million dollars came from members, residents of all of our surrounding area, businesses, civic organizations, funds from our sponsoring cities, church groups, school groups and even a Sunday School t,,,,Class. The Gillespie Center opened its doors in July of 2001 and has grown to almost 950 members and was used by [,..~ ~ver 1,800 individuals during the past year. Quite an accomplishment and quite a sense of pride in our community! During the past year we have officially and legally changed our name to The Gillespie Center. We own and operate our building with the management of The Gillespie Center Board of Directors by fundraising and rentals. We are so grateful to the volunteers who represent the community for taking their time to meet, plan and budget for the operations under the capable leadership of President Sharon Cook and Vice President Cheryl Fischer. One of the committees of The Gillespie Center Board is our Gillespie Center Advisory Council with Chair Barbara Calhoun and Vice Chair Mary Ellen Stoflien. This elected group meets and organizes the programs, services and fundraising efforts with the help of our membership. Both the Chair and Vice Chair of this group are also voting members of The Gillespie Center Board. Both groups would warmly welcome new ideas, suggestions, fundraising help. They meet on the third Wednesday of each month. The Gillespie Center Board meets at 8:00 am and the Gillespie Center Advisory Council meets at 9:30 am. Members are always welcome to attend these meetings. There is also a Membership meeting for all members held each month on the first Tuesday at 1:00 pm.. Senior Community Services is the "umbrella" management organization for our Center and six other centers in the area. Their responsibility is to provide and manage the staff with the advice and consent of The Gillespie Center Board. Ben Withhart, Executive Director of Senior Community Services also is a member of The Gillespie Center Board. We operate our programs and services with a full-time Director, and full-time Assistant Director/Rental Coordinator, two part-time Senior outreach Social Workers, and a part-time Dining Manager. We also have two workers from the Senior Aide Program that help with the Meals-on-Wheels catering and custodial. Our other 250 workers are volunteers who man our phones, plant our gardens, coordinate our programs, host our dining programs, help with fundraising, etc. This past year our incredible volunteers put in over 20,000 hours and at minimum wage of $5.15 per hour provided over $100,000 of labor. We couldn't do it without them. Each year brings more responsibility and creative fundraising to help keep the Center operating in the black. C1 Many thanks again to our terrific Board and Advisory Council Members and Volunteers and to Bill Gillespie who made our dream come true. Happy Spring to all!! - Your Gillespie Center Board and Staff -1102- 03-19-2004 08:52AM FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 4?20620 P.02 -1103- 03-19-2004 08:53AM C FROM LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICA TO 4720620 P. 03 -1104- TOTgL P.03 Minnesota Lawful Gambling FLG555 GOvernment Approval or Acknowledgment or use of Gambling Funds (prevlou,lyLG503andLG265) (06/03) ~Organlzation information (please print) ,Explndlture Description (attach additional sheets tf necesssr~'~ A,.ouniofpropos.d pur soxpendlture I $ 2. Check the appropriate expenditure category: I,.X~ ~ "~bx- v~j~ // ~ Contribution to a unit of government - United States, state of Minnesota, or any of its subdlvlslO%, agencies, or Instrumentalities. NOTE: A contribution may not be made directly to e law enforcement or prosecutorlal agency, such as a police depa.11ment, county sheriff, or county attorney. .... B. A wildlife management project that baneflt~ the public at large with approval of the state agency that has authority over the project.- DeScribe the proposed expenditure, including vendors. C. Grooming and maintaining snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle trails with approval by DNR. NI tretla must be open to public use. - Describe the proposed expenditure, Including vendors. oath · J affirrn that the contrlbuUon or expenditure, in accordance with Minnesota Rules 7861.0120, Subpart 5D(10), does not result in any net monetary gain or other pecuniary benefit to our organization. * I affirm that when lawful gambling funds are used for grooming and maintaining snowmobile or all-tarmln vehicle trails or for any wildlife management project for which reimbursement is received from a unit of government, the reimburse- ment ~-~us.~.~sltad in our lawful gambling account and recorded on the LG ~010-Schedule C/D report. .~h~f eXecutlv~fficer's Signature Phor{e number Da~e Governm~ht Approval/Acknowledgment ' (Chdck One) i~yilgnature below, the representative of the unit of government: m ackn°Wlddi~6S the contribution in 2A above, which will not be used for a pension or retirement fund. m approvei th6 Wlldllre management project as described In 2B above (state agency only). ..... approves the expenditure for grooming and maintaining snowmobile and/or all-terrain vehlc~s_~descrtbed in 2C abOve (D~qR only). ./'c~:) Date I Keep/hl~ completed form attached to the LG1010 - Schedule C/D In your organization's records. .... You do not need to submit this form to the Gambling Control Board. This form will be made available tn alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. If you use a TrY, call us by using the Minnesota Relay Sen, ica and ask to place a call to 651-639-4000. The Information requested on this form will become public Information, when requested by Ihs Board, and will be used Io determine your compliance with Minnesota statutes and roles governing lawful gambling activities. For additional Information, checkourweb site at www. gcb.state.mn.us -1105- Minnesota Lawful Gambling LG555 Government Approval or Acknowledgment For Use of Gambling Funds (prev,ou, yLO 03s L 265) (06/03 Organization Information (please print) ~_ Expenditure Description (~ach additional,sheets ffnecessa~) k~ ~ ~ _~ t. ~ou.tofp~s~la~lpur~eexpenditu~ l$ ~~ ] ~1 ' 2. Check ~eapp~pHate ex~ndlture ~tego~: ~ ~ ~ A. Contribution to a unit of government - United States, stata of Minnesota, or any of Its subdivisions, agencies, or Instmmentalllles. NOTE: A ~ntrlbution may not be made dimply to a law enfor~ment or prosecutorial agent, such as a police deponent, coun~ she~ff, or ~un~ attorney. B. A wildlife management project that benefits the public at large with approval ~ the state agency that has authority over t~ proJeet. · DeScribe the proposed expenditure, including vendors. · C. Grooming and maintaining snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle trails with approval by DNR. All trails must be open to public use. Describe the proposed expenditure, including vendors. Oath * I affirm that the conb'ibution or expenditure, in accordance with Minnesota Rules 7861.0120, Subpart 5D(10), does not result In any net monetary gain or other pecUniary benefit to our organization. . I affirm that when lawful gambling funds ara used for grooming and maintaining snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle ~ralls or for any wildlife management project for which reimbursement is received from a unit of government, the ralmburse- ment/A~ must.~ deposited in our lawful gambling account and recorded on the LG1010-Schedule C/D report. , , ~ Chief ex{~::ufl~-officer% signature ] Phone number Date Government Approval/Acknowledgment (Ch~ckone) Byslgnature below, the representative of the unitofgovemment: __ acknowledges the contribution in 2A above, which will not be used fo~ a pension or retirement fund. __ approves the wildlife management project as described in 2B above (~tata agency only). ... approves the expenditure for grooming and maintaining snowmobile '~nd/or all-terrain vehicle trails described In 2C above (DN_R only). Phone number q-~C:~ -- (~(~0 O Title Keep this completed form attached to the LG 1010 - Schedule C/D in your organization's records. You do not need to submit this form to the Gambling Control Board. This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. If you use a TrY, cell us by using the Minnesota Relay Service and ask to place a call to651-639-4000. The information requested on this form will become public Information, when requested by Ihe Board, and will be used to determine your compliance with Minnesota statutes and rules governing lawful gambling activities. For additional information, check our web site at www. gcb.stata.mn.us 'h -1106- April 1, 2004 Sarah Smith, Community Development Director RE: Two week notice Sarah, Effective April 15, 2004 1 hereby resign as Building Official for the City Of Mound. Respectfully, Building Official -1107-