The URL can be used to link to this page

2004-06-08 ""' ~ ~,, ~ , II ,Iii PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. ................................................................. :.:.>:.>:<.:.:,:.:....: ......................................................... ~ .................................. ~:.:.:~:::~ ............... ~[[[~ AGENDA ~ ~ . *Consent Agenda: items listed under the ConsentAgenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted ~ a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. Jn that event the item will be removed~om the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting - Pledge of Allegiance 2. Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consen~ *A. Approve minutes: May 25, 2004 regular meeting *B. Approve payment of claims *C. Approve Planning Commission Recommendations 1. Case #04-09: Philip Bowman 1717 Finch Lane Variance: front setback for addition Rec: approval with Conditions 1624-1629 1630-1652 1653-1664 *D. Approve resolution authorizing submittal of a Livable Communities Development Grant to the Metropolitan Council for the downtown redevelopment project 1665-1669 *E. Approve payment requests 1. Payment request #6 for work on the Lost Lake Greenway Project 1670-1675 Payment request #1 for work on the 2004 Street Reconstruction Project 1676-1679 3. Final payment for 2002 Retaining Wall Project *F. Approve supplemental agreement #3 with Environmental Associates, Inc for extension of completion date for Lost Lake Greenway Trail Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to three minutes per speaker.) 1680-1684 Handout' PLEASE TURN..._~OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS .IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. o o 2003 Audit Report and Management letter, as presented by Steve McDonald of the auditing firm of Abdo, Eick and Meyers Orv Burma and Pete Nelson, representing LMCD, on zebra mussel infestation Tax forfeit parcels A. Action on request for approval of subdivision exemption for portion of tax forfeit parcel on Denbigh Road (PID No. 19-117-23-24-0047) Action on request for approval of reconveyance of portions (s) of tax Forfeited land to the State of Minnesota on Denbigh Road (PID No. 19- 117-23-24-0047) Review of proposed amendment to the City Code to regulate the creation of physically separated dock lots Miscellaneous/Correspondence A. Newsletter: Xcel Energy B. Report: Harbor Wine & Spirits - May 2004 C. Notice: Metropolitan Council 2005 Budget Meetings D. Newsletter: Gillespie Center E. Letter: Mediacom F. Letter: Moody's Investors Service G. Letter: Hennepin County Administration H. Inventory of items contained in Public Safety Facility time capsule 10. Adjourn 1685-1698 1699-1721 1722-1727 1728-1731 1732 1733-1734 1735 1736~1737 1738-1742 1743 1744 This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. citvofmound, com. , ~,, t , II , COUNCIL BRIEFING June 8, 2004 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! June 5 - 3:00-12:00 - Mound Fire Department Fish Fry June 6 - 10:30 - DARE Open- Burl Oaks June 8 - 7:20 - HRA regular meeting June 8 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting June 18 - 8:00 a.m. - City Golf Outing - Shadow Brooke June 22 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting June 22 - 7:30 CC regular meeting Aug 21-22 - Mound Art in the Park Sept 14 - Primary Election Sept 17 - 6:30 - Taste of the Lakes Nov 2 - General Election Ui~coming Absences Aug 6-15 Kandis Hanson Oct 9-11 Kandis Hanson Oct 16-20 Kandis Hanson Vacation LMC Conference ICMA Conference Admin Offices Closed July 5 Independence Day CSept 6 Labor Day StarTrib West Pick up the June 9 edition on the Star Tribune for the StarTrib West on Mound Redevelopment. the first in a series to be done on Mound. This article is Music in the Park- 7:00 p.m. June 17 June 24 July 8 July 15 July 22 July 29 Buildin~ Official About thirty appl~cations have been requested for the Building Official position. We close ap's on June 18. We hope to have someone in place by mid-August. S eeyov Fry-~ MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 25, 2004 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, May 25, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, City Engineer John Cameron, Jim Prosser, Roger Reed, Dave Beede, Monte Rude, Mike Specht, James Holmbeck, Steve Tibbetts Consent Agenda: Afl items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roil call vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1..Open Meeting and Pledge of Alleqiance Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 2. Al~l~rove Agenda Meisel required the removal of item 3A from the consent agenda for discussion, and the addition of Item 6.1, Greenway Trail. Meyer requested that item 3G be removed from the consent agenda for discussion. Brown requested the addition of Item 8.1 Memorial Day. , MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3. Consent Agenda MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the consent agenda, with the exception of A and G. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. (removed) B. Approval of claims in the amount of $272,655.56. C. Approve Tree Removal and Treatment Licenses for Williams Tree Service and Gullickson Tree Service. D. Extend CBD Parking Program for one more year, until June 30, 2005. E. RESOLUTION NO. 04-65: RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING THE AUTHORIZATION OF CITY SPONSORSHIP OF STATE GRANT-IN-AID SNOWMOBILE TRAIL FUNDS 1 - 1624- Mound City Council Minutes - May 25, 2004 F. Reduction in the amount of letter of credit for Langdon Trails, releasing $38,973.00, leaving a balance of $27,594.00. G. (removed) 3A. Approve Minutes Meisel requested the removal of this item from the consent agenda to allow Hanus to recap the special meeting of May 18, 2004 between the HRA, City Council and Mound Harbor Renaissance Development, LLC, regarding dockage in the Lost Lake District. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to approve the minutes from the May 10, 2004 special meeting workshop, the May 11,2004 regular meeting and the May 18, 2004 joint City Council/HRA Meeting. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Osmek and Meyer. The following voted against: None. Mayor Meisel abstained from voting due to her absence at the May 18, 2004 meeting and that her and her husband own property in the redevelopment district. Motion carried. 3G. Ordinance Addin.q Section 903 to Chapter IX of the City Code Prohibiting Fishin.q at Certain portions of the Lost Lake Channel Meyer stated that he cannot support an ordinance to prohibit fishing in the Greenway Area. The findings in the proposed ordinance state there would be an inherit risk to the public and he disagree because he believes the Greenway is community open space, public lands and waters, it's being financed by public funds, and he thinks fishing is an important youth and family activity and should be allowed in part of that area. Discussion followed regarding the Council's different opinions about fishing adjacent to a public pedestrian walkway. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to pass the following ordinance. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted against: Meyer. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 01-2004: AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 903 TO CHAPTER IX OF THE CITY CODE PROHIBITING FISHING AT CERTAIN PORTIONS OF THE LOST LAKE CHANNEL 4. Comments & Su~qestions from Citizens Present on Any Item Not on the David Beede of Harrison Harbor Twinhomes Association, presented a letter to the Council requesting change in the present ordinance that regulates trapping of beaver. He stated that by the time the situation is brought before the Council, the beaver have already done extensive damage. John Dean suggested checking with the Police Chief and state statute to determine if we can permit the Police Department, or designee, to issue a trapping permit. This subject will be put on the June 8th Agenda for further consideration. 2 - 1625- Mound City Council Minutes - May 25, 2004 Blair Lindemeier, 2360 Commerce Blvd., appeared before the Council to express is disapproval with the no fishing ordinance James Holmbeck, 2222 Mill Pond Lane, presented the Council with photos of a tree on his property that was damaged by the construction of the Langdon Trails development. The developer, Chuck Alcon, has been in contact with Holmbeck and the Council assured him that the problem will be resolved. 5. Public Hearings A. Construction and Realiqnment of CSAH 15/110 John Cameron reviewed the feasibility study for the project. The project has already been bid by Hennepin County and is under construction. The Street improvement portion of the project should be done this November, to allow traffic back on. The landscaping and other finishing touches will be completed in 2005. Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 8:30 p.m. and asked for public comment. Upon receiving none, the public hearing was closed at 8:32 p.m. 1. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-66: RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND REALIGNMENT OF CSAH 15/110. 2. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-67: RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND REALIGNMENT OF CSAH 15/110. 6. Bond Sale for 2004 Projects Jim Prosser of Ehlers & Associates presented the results of three bond sales, bids of which were received earlier today. He noted that as part of the bond review, the City received an upgrade to AA3, which is the second upgrade received since 2001. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, was duly held at the City Hall on May 25, 2004, at 7:30 o'clock P.M. for the purpose, in part, of authorizing the issuance and awarding the sale of $1,785,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2004A. The following members were present: Mayor Meisel, Councilmembers Brown, Hanus, Osmek and Meyer, and the following were absent: None. 3 - 1626- Mound City Council Minutes - May 25, 2004 Member Osmek introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 04-68: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $1,785,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2004A, PLEDGING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SECURITY THEREOF AND LEVYING A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Brown and, after a full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Brown, Hanus, Meisel, Osmek and Meyer; and the following voted against the same: None. Whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. B. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on May 25, 2004, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., for the purpose in part, of considering proposals and awarding the sale of $1,675,000 General Obligation Revenue Bonds, Series 2004B. The following members were present: Mayor Meisel, Councilmembers Brown, Hanus, Osmek and Meyer, and the following were absent: None. Member Brown introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 04-69: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $1,675,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2004B AND PLEDGING FOR THE SECURITY THEREOF NET REVENUES The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Osmek and, after a full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Brown, Hanus, Meisel, Osmek and Meyer; and the following voted against the same: None. Whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. C. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall on May 25, 2004, at 7:30 o'clock P.M., for the purpose in part, of considering proposals and awarding the sale of $500,000 General Obligation Equipment Certificates, Series 2004C. 4 - 1627- Mound City Council Minutes - May 25, 2004 The following members were present: Mayor Meisel, Councilmembers Brown, Hanus, Osmek and Meyer, and the following were absent: None. Member Hanus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 04-70: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $500,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004C, AND LEVYING A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Brown and, after a full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Brown, Hanus, Meisel, Osmek and Meyer; and the following voted against the same: None. Whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 6.1 Greenway Trail John Cameron informed the Council that because of the proposed development by Mound Harbor Renaissance Development, and the City's involvement in trying to go ahead with the possible dredge and dock system, the proposed trail will be in the way. It would have to be crossed many times to do the dredge and could also affect the layout as to how to do the development. It was determined that the up-charge for delaying the portion of the trail affected would be much less than the repair if it were to be constructed now. It was the consensus to have John Dean prepare the necessary documents for agreements with appropriate entities to accommodate the delay of that portion of the trail project, noting that all charges involved would be borne by MHRD. These agreements will be placed on the June 8th agenda. 7. Action on Proposed Amendment to Zoninq Ordinance - Membrane Structure,,; Sarah Smith reviewed the proposed ordinance before the Council. It has been revised as suggested at an earlier meeting. John Dean suggested a few changes in wording regarding structures on public property. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to pass the following noted ordinance as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 02-2004: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 350.310 (DEFINITIONS) AND 350.435 (ACCESSORY BUILDINGS) OF THE MOUND CITY CODE (ZONING ORDINANCE) TO ADOPT REGULATIONS REGARDING THE PLACEMENT OF MEMBRANE STRUCTURES 5 - 1628- Mound City Council Minutes - May 25, 2004 8. Plannin.q Commission Report/Recommendation: Lake Access for Parcels Which are PhysiCally Separated/Applicable Subdivision Procedures After discussion it was decided that this item will be referred back to the Planning Commission for their consideration and recommendation. Both Sarah Smith and David Osmek were absent from the Planning Commission where this was discussed and Smith would like to craft some language and take it back to them one more time. This item will be put on the June 8th Council agenda. 8.1 Memorial Day Bob Brown, because he and Mark Hanus are both Veterans, wanted the public to be aware of and invite their participation in the Memorial Day Parade and the ceremony at Mound Bay Park and at all of the city's cemeteries. 9. MiscellaneouslCorrespondene A. Minutes: Planning Commission - May 3 & 17,2004 B. FYI: Halstead Point sketch plan C. Notes: Hennepin County 15 Project D. Correspondence: LMCD E. LMC: Friday/Monday Fax F. Report: Finance Department-April 2004 G. FYI: Contribution of charitable gambling funds from Jaycees H. Report: 2004 Open Book Meeting I. Correspondence: Mediacom J. Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative K. Calendar: LMCC 10. Adjourn, MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adjourn at 9:25 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 6 - 1629- JUNE 8, 2004 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 052604SU E $481.53 MAY 052604SUE $2,867.20 MAY 052804S U E$10,812.15 MAY 060204S U E$27,176.43 MAY 060804S U E$613,029.31MAY TOTAL $654,366.62 - 1630- CiTY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: May 2004 05/26/04 3:07 PM Page 1 Batch Name Refer 52606 Cash Payment Invoice Transaction Date 5/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Fund Summary 05-26-04CKR User Dollar Amt $481.53 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $481.53 $0.00 In Balance NELSON, JOYCE G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical MDEX REIMBURSEMENT-Medical Expenses Total 101 GENERAL FUND $481.53 10100 Wells Fargo $481.53 $481.53 $481.53 Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $481.53 Total $481.53 - 1 631 - CiTY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 05/26/04 11:51 AM Page I Batch Name 052604CKR Payments Current Period: May 2004 User Dollar Amt $2,867.20 Computer Dollar Amt $2,867.20 $0.00 In Balance Refer 52604 WAYZATA, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA 2004 FORD Invoice $1,206.42 Transaction Date 5/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 206 42 Refer 52605 ROBERTS, COLLETTE ' ' Cash Payment G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents DPEX REIMBURSEMENT-Dependent Care $160.00 Invoice Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical MDEX REIMBURSEMENT-Medical Svcs. $1,500.78 Invoice Transaction Date 5/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,660.78 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $2,867.20 $2,867.20 Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $2,867.20 $2,867.2O - 1632- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 05/28/04 9:54 AM City of Mound Page 1 Payments Cash Payment invoice 15790 052804SUE Payments Computer Dollar Amt $10,812.15 $o.oo Refer 52840 BRAND NETWORKING E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint (.;ontract COMPUTER SETUP $504.96 312612004 Current Period: May 2004 User Dollar Amt $10,812.15 In Balance Transaction Date 5/28/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $504.96 Refer 52840 FACKLER, JAMES Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $95.13 Invoice 052804 5~28~2004 ....... ="~Q/2004 We is Fargo 10100 Total $95.13 Refer 52804 GRAND, DEB Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $182.06 invoice 052804 5~28~2004 Transaction Date 5~28~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $182.06 Refer 52804 STEVEN WALL APPRAISAL SERVI _ Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance MHR APPRAISALS $5,500.00 Invoice 2044 4/14/2004 Transaction Date 5~28~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,500.00 WALDRON, PAUL A. AND ASSOCIA Refer 52804 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs invoice 052804 5~28~2004 Transaction Date 5~28~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $10,812.15 $10,812.15 04-15-04 THRU 05-19-04 BLDG INSPECTIONS $4,530.00 Total $4,530.00 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $10,812.15 $10,812.15 - 1633 - CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 06/02/04 3:57 PM Payments Page 1 Batch Name 060204SUE Payments Current Period: June 2004 User Dollar Amt $27,176.43 Computer Dollar Amt $27,176.43 Refer 60204 BRINKMANS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA SKIDSTEER TRAILER Invoice 18203 4/28/2004 PO 18385 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60204 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells 04-23-04 SERVICE CALL Invoice 060204 6/8/2002 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60204 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I $0.00 In Balance $4,135.00 Total $4,135.00 $70.00 Total $70.00 Cash Payment Invoice 060204 Cash Payment Invoice 060204 Cash Payment invoice 060204 Cash Payment Invoice 060204 Cash Payment invoice 060204 Cash Payment Invoice 060204 Cash Payment invoice 060204 Cash Payment invoice 060204 Cash Payment Invoice 060204 Cash Payment invoice 060204 Cash Payment invoice 060204 Cash Payment invoice 060204 Cash Payment Invoice 060204 Cash Payment Invoice 060204 Transaction Date Refer 60204 PETTY CASH E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 G 101-22987 4679 Hampton Rd #04-11 Fi 5/11/2004 G 101-22983 1749 Bluebird Ln #04-08 Han 04-04 1749 BLUEBIRD #04-08 5/11/2004 G 101-22984 1717 Finch Ln #04-09 Bowm 04-04 1717 FINCH #04-09 5/11/2004 G 101-22994 MHR Alternative Urban Area 5/11/2004 E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 E 401-45200-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 5/11/2004 E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 5/11/2004 6/1/2004 04-04 LOST LAKE GREENWAY 04-04 CTY RD 15 STREETSCAPE 04-04 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING 04-04 OLSON RESOLUTION 04-04 ALTERNATE URBAN AREA REVIEW 04-04 MOUND VISIONS 04-04 MOUND VISIONS 04-04 MOUND VISIONS 04-04 MOUND VISIONS 04-04 MOUND VISIONS 04-04 MOUND VISIONS 04-04 MOUND VISIONS Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,396.76 $4,332.93 $1,401.25 $85.0O $170.00 $212.50 $170.00 $1,603.90 $312.50 $2,976.00 $732.50 $21 t.25 $3,107.08 $725.00 $22,436.67 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH Invoice 060204 6/2/2004 PO 18369 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 -,,,, ..... Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60204 PROFESSIONAL LA W ENFORCEM Total $329.76 $329.76 - 1634- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 06/02/04 3:57 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: June 2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 06-17-04 CONFERENCE HAWKS,SHIRLEY $55.00 Invoice 060204 6/2/2004 PO 18364 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $55.00 Refer 60204 RAMSEY COUNTY Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow CASE #04-1579 BOOKING #7194 $150.00 Invoice 060204 6/2/2004 .... ate 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ~ ~.00 /ransac[Iorl ~ Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 455 TIF 1-2 601 WATER FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $7,511.01 $14,229.44 $2,328.90 $3,107.08 $27,176.43 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $27,176.43 $27,176.43 - 1635- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 06/03/04 11:22 AM Payments Page 1 Batch Name 060804SUE Payments Current Period: June 2004 User Dollar Amt $613,029.31 Computer Dollar Amt $613,029.31 $0.00 In Balance Refer 60804 AAA NURSERY AND LANDSCAPIN Cash Payment E 101-43100-4.00 Repairs & Maint Contract DIRT Invoice 060804 5/24/2004 $239.62 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 We s Far o .... ~ ~ .......... ~ Refer 60804 ACTION RADIO AND COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 101-42115-210 Operating Supplies RADIO EQUIPMENT Invoice 2846 3/31/2004 PO 18373 $1,788.00 Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA #845 BUILD UP Invoice 2827 3/31/2004 PO 18129 $7,540.55 Transaction Date 612/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,328.55 Refer 60804 ALEX AIR APPARA TUS, INCORPO Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair SCUBA COMPRESSOR Invoice 6708 4/11/2004 $1,235.40 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,235.40 Refer 60804 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INCO Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. nvoice 59374 5/27/2004 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Refer 60804 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE PAGER REPAIRS $75.59 Wells Fargo 10100 Total- $75.59 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438414905 5/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438415004 5128/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 377414513 5/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438415317 5/2812004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Refer 60804 ARNE, STEVE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Refer 60804 AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS OF BIG $53.82 $87.42 $126.80 $105.38 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $373.42 REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies Invoice 66999 5/21/2004 PO 18368 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo Refer 60804 BAUER, RON .......... ................................ .......... ~¢~""C-ash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE ~,~ nvoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 SPEAKERS FOR BASE STATION 10100 $95.69 Total $95~69 $250.00 $15.00 - 1636- CiTY OF MOUND Transaction Date 6/2/2004 City of Mound Payments 06/03/04 11:22 AM Page 2 Current Period: June 2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $265.00 Refer 60804 BECK, KENNETH $25.00 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REIMBURSE MILEAGE invoice 060804 6~8~2004 Total $25.00 ........ 004 Wells Fargo 10100 Transaction uate Refer 60804 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ $109.'15 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE invoice 38473400 5~28~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 29649700 5~28~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE invoice 38476100 5~28~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR invoice 29582800 5128/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 29590700 5/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 29593500 5/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE invoice 29593500 5~28~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 29660600 5/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE invoice 29596200 5/28/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 $909.70 $213.94 $1,766.75 $1,538.55 $624.00 $624.00 $1,225.20 $80.00 Total $7,091.29 Refer 60804 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE invoice 419588 5~26~2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE Invoice 419588 5/26/2004 Cash Payment E 281-45210-430 Miscellaneous COFFEE Invoice 419588 5/26/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 $21.25 $8.50 $4.25 Total $34.00 Refer 60804 BORNE, RYAN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 612/2004 REFUND DOCK FEE REFUND LMCD FEE Wells Fargo 10100 $250.00 $15.00 Total $265.00 Refer 60804 BROWN, JIM CULTURED SOD FAR_ Cash Payment invoice 8239 5/18/2004 PO 18312 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Refer 60804 BUMANN, MARY E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials SOD Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits invoice 060804 6/8/2004 $42.17 REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 - 1637- CiTY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 060804 City of Mound Payments 06/03/04 11:22 AM Page 3 Current Period: June 2004 R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE 6/8/2004 $11.25 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10 I00 Total ............. .... $261.25 Refer 60804 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHE .......................................... Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 PO 18371 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 PO 18371 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Refer 60804 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply - Invoice D3599 5/18/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110.404 Repairs/Maint Machinery ATV BATTERY Invoice D2853 5/18/2004 PO 18367 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials OIL FILTERS Invoice D33015 5/18/2004 PO 18316 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials OIL FILTERS Invoice D33015 5/18/2004 PO 18316 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials OIL FILTERS Invoice D33015 5/18/2004 PO 18316 'ransaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo Refer 60804 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG INTOXILYZER RECERTIFICATION, BURKE $45.00 INTOXILYZER RECERTIFICATION MURRAY $45.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $90.00 AIR FILTER -$15.55 $23.43 $33.03 $33.03 $33.02 10100 Total $106.96 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-383 Gas Utilities invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Refer 60804 CHAMPION AUTO 04-19-04 THRU 05-19-04 #543-004-921-200 04-19-04 THRU 05-19-04 #543-004-921-200 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $183.11 $122.07 $305.18 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair BEARINGS Invoice D260275 5/25/2004 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo Refer 60804 CHASE, C. COMPANY 10100 Total $8.51 $8.51 Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Refer 60804 CLARK PRODUCTS, INCORPORAT CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT Wells Fargo 10100 Total $342.50 $342.50 Cash Payment E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services Invoice V493760 5/13/2004 PO 18356 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Refer 60804 CLASSIFIEDS, ROUNDUP, LAKER, PAPER TOWELING, CUPS Wells Fargo 10100 Total $78.61 $78.61 Cash Payment E 602-49450-328 Employment Advertising CLASSIFIED AD invoice 32968-B 5/1/2004 $12.35 ¢,,,,,~Transaction Date 6/I/2004 __ ...... ............. ~ ..... Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,35 ~,efer 60804 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST ................................................... Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX invoice 83484145 5/27/2004 $364.60 - 1638- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 6/1/2004 City of Mound Payments Current Period: June 2004 Wells Fargo 10100 06/03/04 11:22 AM Page 4 Total $364.60 Refer 60804 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORIN Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts CHAINSAWS/CONCRETE SAWS $17.37 Invoice 46068 5/25f2004 PO 18317 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts CHAINSAWS/CONCRETE SAWS $17.37 invoice 46068 5~25~2004 PO 18317 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts CHAINSAWS/CONCRETE SAWS $17.36 Invoice 46068 512512004 PO 18317 Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts CHAINSAWS/CONCRETE SAWS $14.12 Invoice 633218 5~25~2004 PO 18317 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts CHAINSAWS/CONCRETE SAWS $14.12 invoice 633218 5/25/2004 PO 18317 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts CHAINSAWS/CONCRETE SAWS $14.11 invoice 633218 5/25/2004 PO 18317 Transaction Date 6~3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $94.47 Refer 60804 CUMMINGS NPOWER, LLC $372.90 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 05-15-04 SERVICE CALL invoice 100-78257 4/28/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $372.90 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 ..... ~_ ..... Refer 60804 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT $1,001,38 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply METERS invoice 3226495 5/12/2004 PO 18308 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,001.38 Refer 60804 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY $90.00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 266634 6/1/2004 $732.35 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 266027 6/1/2004 $75.55 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 266028 6/1/2004 $1,869.95 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 267093 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,767.85 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 .... ~ ...... . - - ' Refer 60804 DEL PLACEMENT AGENCY, INCOR _ $100.00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising LIQUOR Invoice 5003 5/11/2004 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.00 Refer 60804 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER invoice 43955 5/20/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 222934 5/20/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER invoice 223031 5/20/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 223029 5/20/2004 Transaction Date 612/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.00 $5,242.80 $2,628,60 $2,714.25 $10,665.65 - 1639- .. City of Mound //" Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2004 Refer 60804 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs THRU 05-31-04 REQUEST #6 invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60804 ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT AN Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay (GENt~RA ELGIN SWEEPER invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment R 101-39101 Sales of General Fixed Asset TRADE ALLOWANCE Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 06/03/04 11:22 AM Page 5 $156,261.95 Total $156,261.95 $133,585.87 -$13.800.00 Total $119,785.87 Refer 60804 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY, INCORPOR Cash Payment Invoice 1805 Transaction Date E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 5~20/2004 6/3/2004 REPAIR CONDENSER FAN MOTOR Wells Fargo 10100 $783.40 Total $783.40 Refer 60804 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $32.00 Invoice 206096 5/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $32.00 Invoice 204832 5/27/2004 ransaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64.00 Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract WINDOW CLEANING $809.40 Invoice 019276 5/21/2004 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $809.40 Refer 60804 FINK, CRAIG ......... Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 ...... . ..... Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250 00 Cash Payment E 609-49750.409 Other Equipment Repair 2004 ANNUAL SERVICE $39.50 Invoice 79817 5/3/2004 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Refer 60804 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Trainin~ invoice 060804 6/8/2004 PO 18080 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $39.50 EXCEL CLASS, WEIST, KATHY Wells Fargo 10100 Total $79.00 $79.00 Refer 60804 FULLERTON BUILDING CENTER Cash Payment E 101.45200-223 Building Repair Supplies CEDAR $41.51 Invoice 2073448 5/20/2004 PO 18389 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ................................... ~ $41 51 Refer 60804 G & K SERVICES '~ ................................. Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 05~25-04 UNIFORMS $67.00 'nvoice 6130631 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 05~25-04 UNIFORMS $67.00 Invoice 6130631 6/8/2004 - 1640- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: June 2004 06/03104 11:22 AM Page 6 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 05-25-04 UNIFORMS $67.00 Invoice 6130631 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 05-25-04 MATS $19,38 Invoice 6130631 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 05-25-04 MATS $19.38 Invoice 6130631 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 05-25-04 MATS $19.38 invoice 6130631 618/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 05-25-04 MATS $67.56 invoice 6130621 6~8~2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 05-25-04 MATS $96.92 Invoice 6130632 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 05-25-04 MATS $96.92 Invoice 6130633 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 05-25-04 MATS $28.30 invoice 6130622 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 05-18-04 UNIFORMS $28.36 invoice 6124091 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 05-18-04 UNIFORMS $28.36 Invoice 6124091 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 05-18-04 UNIFORMS $28.35 invoice 6124091 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 05-18-04 MATS $26.00 invoice 6124091 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 05-18-04 MATS $26,00 Invoice 6124091 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 05-18-04 MATS $26.00 invoice 6124091 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services 05-25-04 MATS $38.55 Invoice 6130622 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/312004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $750.46 Refer 60804 GAUDREAU, ANNETTE Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250,00 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $7.50 invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.50 Refer 60804 GME CONSULTANTS Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs GEOTECHNICAL CULVERT SETTLEMENT $2,345.00 invoice 19647 5~26~2004 Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs LOST LAKE GREENWAY $735.00 Invoice 19605 5/26/2004 Transaction Date 6~3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,080.00 Refer 60804 GOUGHNOUR, FRED Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $15.00 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 - 1641 - City of Mound 06/03/04 11;22 AM Page 7 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2004 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 .............. Wells Fargo 10100 Total $265.00 Cash Payment E 101.43100-230 Shop Materials Invoice 495-390307-9 5/21/2004 PO 18315 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials Invoice 495-390307-9 5/21/2004 PO 18315 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials Invoice 495-390307-9 5/21/2004 PO 18315 BLOWER MOTORS $54.45 SLOWER MOTORS $54.45 BLOWER MOTORS $54.45 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 ....... -~ ............... ~ ......... Total ~1R2 Refer 60804 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE invoice 894431 5/26/2004 $393.65 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 894431 5/26/2004 $1,552.23 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 891344 5/26/2004 $55.95 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 891343 5/26/2004 $115.60 Cash Payment E 609.49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 891342 5/26/2004 $1,300.02 transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,417.45 Refer 60804 HACH COMPANY Cash Payment E 601.49400-227 Chemicals CHEMICALS Invoice 3866763 5/20/2004 PO 18380 $125.89 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $125 89 Refer ~0804 HANsoN' ~/~N~is Cash Payment E 101-41310-212 Motor Fuels REIMBURSE MILEAGE Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 $106.50 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells REIMBURSE DSL LINE Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 $99.90 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $206.40 Refer 60804 HARRIGAN, JOHN W. ...... Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT Invoice 060804 5/20/2004 $451.16 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600.450 Board of Prisoners 04~04 BOOKING FEE Invoice 162 5/4/2004 $1,442.22 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,442.22 Refer 60804 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR (R Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 04-04 ROOM AND BOARD Invoice 000490 5/21/2004 $1,567.00 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 We s Far o 1 ¢'"' g 0100 To ~ tal $1 567.00 ~efer 60804 HUMANE SOCIETY WRIGHT COUN ..... ~ .................... L"-'C-~sh Payment E 10%42110.445 Dog Kennel Fees 1ST QTR IMPOUND SERVICES Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 $251.00 - 1642- CiTY OF MOUND Transaction Date 6/2/2004 City of Mound Payments 06/03/04 11:22 AM Page 8 Current Period: June 2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $251.00 Refer 60804 INFRATECH $97.02 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply FLAGS invoice 0400724 5/27/2004 PO 18305 Total $97.02 Transaction Date 61312004 We!? ~a?~o ........................... !~,~!,~ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For ResaLe LIQUOR $182.99 Invoice 1728864 5/26/2004 $444,32 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE invoice 1728863 5/26/2004 $1,223.63 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE invoice 1728862 5~26~2004 $820.70 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1728861 5/26/2004 $473.62 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1725599 5/26/2004 $229.73 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1725600 5/26/2004 $273.05 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1725602 5/26/2004 -$5.52 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE Invoice 2251183 5/26/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,642.52 Refer 60804 KELLEHER CONSTRUCTION, INO0 Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GbNERA PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $2,546.00 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Total $2,546.00 Transact on Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $3,264,00 invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,264.00 Refer 60804 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN $9.00 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 04-04 MISC BILLABLE invoice 61546-A 5/25/2004 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 04-04 REDEVELOP PROJECT AREA #1 $551.10 Invoice 61546-B 5/25/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 04-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $6,506.14 Invoice 61546-C 5~25~2004 Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs 04-04 CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT $6,662.11 invoice 61547-A 5/25/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 04-04 DREAMWOOD LAWSUITE $96.00 invoice 61547-B 5/25/2004 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 04-04 SKAALERUD LOT SURVEY $72.40 invoice 61547-C 5/25/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 04-04 MINNETRISTA FIRE AGREEMENT $12.80 Invoice 61547-D 5/25/2004 $232.50 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 04-04 ADMINISTRATIVE invoice 61547-F 5~25~2004 - 1643- City of Mound /"~ ~ '~'~ ? Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2004 06/03/04 11:22 AM Page 9 Cash Payment E 101-41600-313 Legal-Liquor Invoice 61547-G 5/25/2004 Cash Payment E 401-43110-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 61547-H 1 5/25/2004 Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 61547-H2 5/25/2004 Cash Payment Invoice 61547-11 Cash Payment Invoice 61547-12 Cash Payment Invoice 61547-13 Cash Payment Invoice 61547-14 Cash Payment Invoice 61547-15 Cash Payment invoice 61547 Transaction Date Refer 60804 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T 04-04 LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATION 04-04 RETAINING WALL PROJECT 04-04 CTY RD 15 REALIGHMENT G 101-22979 1599 Bluebird Lane Vacation 04-04 1599 BLUEBIRD LANE #04~04 5/25/2004 G 101-22981 2163 Fairview #04-06 Varian 04-04 2163 FAIRVIEW #04-06 5/25/2004 G 101-22984 1717 Finch Ln #04-09 Bowm 04-04 1717 FINCH LANE 04-09 5/25/2004 G 101-22977 NSP Excel #04-01/#04-02 Va 04-04 XCEL ENERGY VARIANCE 5/25/2004 E 101-41600-316 Legal P & I 5/25/2004 E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 5/25/2004 6/3/2004 04-04 MISC PLANNING/ZONING 04-04 EXECUTIVE Wells Fargo 10100 $30.00 $178.O0 $156.00 $252.00 $276.00 $36.00 $102.00 $293.00 $1,765.08 Total $17,230,13 CCash Payment ~nvoice 16227 Transaction Date Rear 60804 Cash Payment invoice 671367 Cash Payment Invoice 670784 Cash Payment invoice 670785 Cash Payment invoice 673276 Cash Payment Invoice 673275 Cash Payment Invoice 673274 Transaction Date E 609-49750-361 General Liability Ins LIQUOR LIABILITLY $4,748.O0 5/24/2004 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 ............................... . .......... ~. Total $4,748.00 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR ............... E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 3/26/2OO4 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 3/26/2004 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 3/26/20O4 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 3/26/2004 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 3/26/2004 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 3/26/2004 6/1~2004 Wells Fargo Refer 60804 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY 10100 Total $255.00 $4,438.80 $53.3O $23.00 $45.00 $2,031.25 $6,846.35 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight invoice 14177 5/3/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750~265 Freight invoice 14196 5/3/2004 Cash Payment E 609.49750-265 Freight Invoice 14207 5/3/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight C 'nvoice 14228 5/3/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 14253 5/3/2004 05-03-04 DELIVERY CHARGE 05-06-04 DELIVERY CHARGE 05-10-04 DELIVERY CHARGE 05-13-04 DELIVERY CHARAGE 05-20-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $7.20 $95.4O $12.60 $160.20 $83.70 - - 1644- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment invoice 14264 Cash Payment City of Mound Payments 06/03/04 11:22 AM Page 10 Current Period: June 2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 05-24-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $9.00 5/3/2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 05-27-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $90.00 Invoice 14286 5/3/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 We is Fargo 10100 Total $458.10 Refer 60804 MATRX MEDICAL $557.38 Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies MEDICAL SUPPLIES Invoice 852486 5/13/2004 PO 18361 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $557.38 Refer 60804 MCFOA Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions 07-01-04THRU 06-30-04 MEMBERSHIP DUES $40.00 invoice 060804 6/8/2004 ...... ~/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ~ $40.00 Cash Payment G 602-21825 SAC Deposits 05-04 SAC CHARGES $6,682.50 invoice 060804 6~8~2004 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,682.50 Refer 60804 MIDWEST LANDSCAPING Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (G~-NERA PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $1,332.00 invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,332.00 Refer 60804 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH Cash Payment E 601-49400-433 Dues and Subscriptions CERTIFICATION, NELSON $23.00 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 PO 18313 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $23.00 Refer 60804 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA Cash Payment E 601-49400-470 Water Samples COLIFORM, MF - WATER $77.50 invoice 211899 5/18/2004 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.50 Refer 60804 MORRELL AND MORRELL, INCOR Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services invoice 7310 5~24~2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Refer 60804 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT . Cash Payment E 222-42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salades Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-t85 Fire-Maintenance Pay 05-15-04 RECYCLE DAY Wells Fargo 05-04 DRILLS 05-04 SALARIES 05-04 MAINTENANCE $1,172,08 10100 Total $1,172.08 $1,000.00 $6,954.00 $1,081.00 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6~3~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,035.00 Refer 60804 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA TIO Cash Payment E 895-49990-124 Fire Pens Contrib 06-04 FiRE RELIEF $9,641,67 Invoice 060804 6~8~2004 Transaction Date 6~3~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,641.67 - 1645- City of Mound 06/03/0411:22 AM Page 11 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2004 Refer 60804 NEWMAN SIGNS Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials BLANK SHEETED SQUARES Invoice TI-0123403 5/19/2004 $99.75 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 .............................. Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.75 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 04-19-04 THRU 05-18-~ CELL PHONES $76.75 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ....... ~7R V~ Refer 60804 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (PAR ......... ..................... ~ Cash Payment invoice 060804 Cash Payment Invoice 060804 Cash Payment Invoice 060804 Cash Payment Invoice 060804 Dash Payment Invoice 060804 Cash Payment invoice 060804 E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 6/8/2004 E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 6/8/2004 E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Ceils 6/8/2004 E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells 6/8/2004 E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 6/8/2004 E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 6/8/2004 04-19-04 THRU 05-18-04 612-221-6740 BERENT,BRIAN $35.40 04-19-04 THRU 05-18-04 612-221-6974 TAFFE,JOHN $15.06 04-19-04 THRU 05-18-04 612-221-6812 FACKLER,JIM $87.89 04-19-04 THRU 05-18-04 612-221-6813 HOFF,KATIE $31.74 04-19-04 THRU 05-18-04 612-282-5889 SIMONEAU,MATT $71.55 04-19-04 THRU 05-18-04 612-363-5883 NORLANDER,JILL $29.59 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 We s Far o ~.~'~ ............... .~ ........ g 10100 Tota $ 1 er 60804 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 03-19-04 THRU 04-18-04 CELL PHONES $474.1 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $474.11 Refer 60804 NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials TRAILER TIE DOWNS Invoice 15127 5/19/2004 $63.77 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 .~ We s Fargo 10100 $63.77 Refer 60804 PA TCHIN MESSNER AND DODD Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 2301-2305 COMMERCE BLVD APPRAISALS $0.00 Invoice 20413-4 5/18/2004 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $0.00 Refer 60804 PA US TIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8037399 5/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609.-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE Invoice 8037197 5/27/2004 C,';,ash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE nvoice 8037185 5/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8036978 5/27/2004 $221.50 -$40.00 $40.00 $486.98 - -1646- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 8037629 Cash Payment invoice 8037630 Transaction Date E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale 5/27/2004 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale 5/2712004 6/1/2004 City of Mound Payments 06/03/04 11:22 ,AM Page 12 Current Period: June 2004 WINE $202.50 WINE $19.95 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $930.93 Refer 60804 PEDERSON, GREG Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies DIGITAL PHOTOS $12.73 invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo ~.0.!~,.0' ........................ ~!, ~2.73 Refer 60804 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY _ $99.00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 59531689 5/26/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.00 Refer 60804 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $311.00 Invoice 2075422 5/26/2004 $69.75 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2072954 5/26/2004 $160.80 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2072955 5126/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,440.00 Invoice 2064736 5/26/2004 Transaction Date 6/112004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,981.55 Refer 60804 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE $341.87 Invoice 41286 5/25/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $341.87 Refer 60804 PLUNKETT'S, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic MAY,JUN,JUL PEST CONTROL $40.80 invoice 285528 6/1/2004 T -" h Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ~4.0 80 ransac[ o ' Refer 60804 PYTLESKI, JOHN Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND DOCK FEE $250.00 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND DOCK FEE $15.00 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $265.00 Refer 60804 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 410233-00 5/2712004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR invoice 409360-00 5/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX invoice 409361-00 5/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WiNE invoice 409275-00 5/27/2004 $26.07 $1,286.92 $112.25 $314.67 - 1647- C CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 06~03~04 11:22 AM Page 13 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 405255-00 5/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale invoice 705778-00 5/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 406589-00 5/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 406441-00 5/27/2004 Current Period: June 2004 CREDIT-LIQUOR -$648.79 CREDIT-WINE WINE $419.56 LIQUOR $975.20 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 ................ Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2 478 55 Refer 60804 RANDY's'S~NIT-ATION Cash Payment E 101-41910-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 05-04 GARBAGE SERVICE invoice 1594 5/19/2004 $114.54 Transaction Date 6~2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60804 RIDGEVlEW MEDICAL, MOUND Cash Payment E 101-45200-305 Medical Services DRUG SCREENING SWARTZER Invoice 060804 618/2004 $26.00 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $26.00 Refer 60804 SBC MINNCOMM PAGING Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. 06-04 PAGERS C Invoice 20233306040 6/1/2004 $94.59 Fransaction Date 6/3/2004 __ Wells Fargo 10100 Total $94.59 Refer 60804 SCHARBER AND SONS Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair OIL FILTER & SERVICE Invoice 02 2039813 5/21/2004 $442.46 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $442.46 Refer 60804 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES T Cash Payment E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense TRIAD TO HENNEPIN COUNTY $125.00 Invoice 060604 6/8/2004 PO 18372 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $125.00 Refer 60804 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, IN .......... ........ ~' ............. Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous PUBLICATION Invoice 911022 5/25/2004 $25.00 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 ..... Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 60804 sH~REWOOD~EE'-~,,;CE $25.00 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal GREENWAY PROJECT Invoice 5023 5/21/2004 $670.95 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal GREENWAY PROJECT Invoice 5032 5/21/2004 $1,011.75 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 WelJs Fargo 10100 Total $1,682.70 Refer 60804 SPECIALTY WINES AND BEVERAG Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 113 5/26/2004 $554.00 c Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $554 00 Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 05-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 $306.78 - 1648- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 06/03/04 11:22 AM Page 14 Current Period: June 2004 Refer 60804 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (P/W _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-212 Motor Fuels' THRU 05-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $89.35 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels THRU 05-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $654.81 invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels THRU 05-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $443.34 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels THRU 05-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $269.19 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transact on Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 1010Q ........ ~!~! ...................... Refer 60804 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (PAR Cash Payment E 101-41110-431 Meeting Expense DIASTER TRAINING $12.97 Invoice 060804 6~8~2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-212 Motor Fuels THRU 05-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $897.09 Invoice 060804 6~8~2004 T ..... *~,~,~ r~t~ 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $~!0.06 Refer 60804 STAR TRIBUNE NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing BLDG OFFICIAL AD $257.90 Invoice A06270713 5/23/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.90 Refer 60804 STRAUGHAN HARDWARE, INCOR Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $4,293.00 invoice 060804 6/8/2004 T ...... -te 61112004 We, s Fargo 10100 Tot., Refer 60804 STREICHER'S Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies BALLISTIC HELMETS $35.00 Invoice 438900.1 5~6~2004 PO 18352 Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies BALLISTIC HELMETS $35.00 Invoice 438900.2 5~6~2004 PO 18352 Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies BALLISTIC HELMETS $35.00 Invoice 438517,3 51612004 PO 18352 Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies BALLISTIC HELMETS $35.00 Invoice 438877,1 5/6/2004 PO 18352 Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies CREDIT-HELMET -$67.06 Invoice 439973.1 5~6~2004 PO 18352 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $52.94 Transact on Date 6~2~2004 Refer 60804 SUBURBAN TIRE COMPANY Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TRUCK #9 TIRES invoice 10023762 5/18/2004 PO 18378 Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TRUCK #9 TIRES invoice 10023762 5/18/2004 PO 18378 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo Refer 60804 SUNRAM CONSTRUCTION INCOR Cash Payment E 401-43110-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 060804 612/2004 $178.77 $178.77 10100 Total $357.54 2002 RETAINING WALL $5,817.85 - 1649- CiTY OF MOUND Transaction Date 6/3/2004 City of Mound Payments 06/03/04 11:22 AM Page 15 Current Period: June 2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,8t7.85 Refer 60804 SUPERIOR FORD FLEET/GOVERN Cash Payment E 10t-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery CAB TRAY $38.15 Invoice 549945 5/24/2004 PO 18314 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $38.15 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms T-SHIRTS $486.50 invoice TS040978 5/20/2004 PO 18386 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $486 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $314.00 Invoice 32483 5/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $57.05 Invoice 335337 5/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $8,738.20 Invoice 335338 5/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $271.00 Invoice 32390 5/28/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,559.50 C Invoice 336020 5/28/2004 'Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $157.75 Invoice 336019 5/28/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14,097.50 Refer 60804 TOL'i-Z, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSO Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs 04-01-04 LEAK SURVEY $275.55 Invoice 067446 4/30/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $275.55 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training TUITION MN MC SAFETY $125.00 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $125.00 Refer 60804 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 429096-0 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 429096-0 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 429096-0 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 429096-0 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 429096-0 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 429096-0 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 429096-0 6/8/2004 MISCELLANEOUPS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUPS SUPPLIES MlSCELLANEOUPS SUPPLIES MlSCELLANEOUPS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUPS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUPS SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUPS SUPPLIES $21.59 $21.59 $21,59 $21.59 $21.59 $7.18 $14.39 - 1650- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies invoice 429096-0 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies invoice 429227-0 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies invoice 429739-0 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 428354-0 6/8/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 428354-0 618/2004 Transaction Date 6~3~2004 Refer 60804 UNIFORMS LIMITED G 101-22803 Police Reserves 5/14/2004 G 101-22803 Police Reserves 5/14/2004 G 101-22803 Police Reserves 5/14/2004 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 5/14/2004 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 5/14~2004 Cash Payment Invoice 223636 Cash Payment Invoice 223988 Cash Payment Invoice 223989 Cash Payment invoice 224950 Cash Payment Invoice 224903 City of Mound Payments 06/03/04 11:22 AM Page 16 Current Period: June 2004 MISCELLANEOUPS SUPPLIES $14.39 TOWERS,TISSUE $128.10 CARTRIDGE TAPE $61.73 FOOTREST,TONER CARTRDIGE $128.11 FOOTREST $52.05 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $513,90 UNIFORMS $195.15 UNIFORMS $995.08 UNIFORMS $91,35 UNIFORMS $28.95 UNIFORMS $28.95 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,339.48 Refer 60804 VALLEY PA VING, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs 2004 STREETS $165,494.32 invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $165,494.32 Refer 60804 Cash Payment Invoice 2430 5/1/2004 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Refer 60804 WELLS FARGO WASH DEPOT E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 04-04 SQUAD WASHES Cash Payment E 354-47000-620 Fiscal Agent's Fees Invoice 146661 5/20/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 $11.98 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11.98 GO TAX INC SERIES II 12-1-85 $375,00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $375.00 Refer 60804 WILKIE SANDERSON Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $2,067.00 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/112004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,067.00 Refer 60804 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $288.07 Invoice 28815-00 5/2712004 Transact on Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10!00 ......... ~,.a.=l. .......................... ~..2..~8.07 Refer 60804 WINE MERCHANTS $0,00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 97338 5~26~2004 -1651 - City of Mound 06/03/04 11:22 AM Page 17 Payments CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment invoice 96847 Current Period: June 2004 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,472.50 5~26/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,472.50 Refer 60804 WORLD CLASS WINES, INCORPO Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resate WINE $475.50 invoice 150425 5/19/2004 Transaction Date 6/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $475.50 Refer 60804 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electdc Utilities 05-04 #0895-951-498-147 $930.02 Invoice 060804 6/8/2004 Transaction Date 6/1/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $930.02 Refer 60804 ZIEGLER, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay (GENt~RA TRAILER $2,000.00 Invoice J2759001 5/21/2004 PO 18296 Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA TRAILER $2,000.00 Invoice J2759001 5/21/2004 PO 18296 Cash Payment E 602.49450-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA TRAILER $2,000.00 Invoice J2759001 512112004 PO 18296 Transaction Date 6/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,000.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 354 Commerce Place TIF 1-1 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 455 TIF 1-2 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 895 FIRE RELIEF FUND $155,429.51 $11,224.41 $2,122.24 $375.OO $338,516.29 $551.10 $13,502.00 $4,263.17 $9,774.24 $66,457.60 $1,172.08 $9,641.67 $613,029.31 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $613,029.31 $613,029.31 -1652- MEMORANDUM Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: June 2, 2004 SUBJECT: PC Case #04-09 1717 Finch Lane - Variance - Philip Bowman This case was tabled at the May 3ra Planning Commission meeting and approved by a 4-2 vote at the May 17th meeting. During that time the applicant revised the plans to maintain the existing first story front yard setback for the proposed second story addition. The Commission struggled with the case but ultimately concluded that there were a number of unique circumstances regarding the location of the house on the lot and the fact that the entire street corridor had similar front yard setback issues. Originally Staff's recommendation was to deny the front yard setback request due to the additional encroachment. The modified request was more palatable for Staffas it didn't further increase the nonconformity. Staffhas executed an extension to the 60-day rule in M.S.S. 15.99 to accommodate additional review time for the case. The applicant was not able to attend the May 25th City Council meeting so the case was postponed for action to the June 8th meeting. A Resolution for approval is included for City Council review and adoption. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 - 1653- :- RESOLUTION # 04- A RESOLUTION APPROVING FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A SECOND STORY ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1717 FINCH LANE, LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 13, DREAMWOOD PID # 13-117-24 13 0048 P & Z CASE #04-09 WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for a front yard variance to construct a second story room addition of the existing house at 1717 Finch Lane. The associated variances identified are as follows: Front yard Existinq/Proposed Required 7 feet 20 feet Variance 13 feet ; and, WHEREAS, the property is located within an R-lA Single Family Residential Zoning District which according to City Code requires a minimum of 6000 square feet of lot area, 40 feet of street frontage, a 20 feet front yard setback, and 6 feet side yards for lots of record; and, WHEREAS, The plans show that the room addition would measure 14'8" x 8'. A window box or bay window is also shown on the front wall of the addition. This is an allowable yard encroachment under Zoning Code Section 350:440 Subd. (3)(H) and is less than the maximum encroachment area of 8 square feet; and, WHEREAS, Resolution #92-55 granted a variance to recognize the 7.1 feet front yard and 0.3 feet side yard setbacks to allow two conforming additions; and, C - 1654- WHEREAS, The existing main floor entry does not have a second story. The entry has a 7.1 feet setback from the Finch Lane right-of-way; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended that the Council approve the front yard variance as requested by the applicant; and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the front yard variance as requested with the following conditions: The City Engineer review grading and drainage issues, if applicable, at the time of building permit. The applicant shall be responsible for the payment of all costs associated with the variance request. c. The applicant shall be responsible for all necessary building permits. The City Council adopts the following findings in support of the front yard setback variance: a. Many houses along Finch Lane have reduced front yard setbacks. The existing entry setback creates a that will not be increased with the addition. nonconforming condition proposed second story c. The house floor plan is conducive to the proposed addition. 5. This variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 13, DREAMWOOD This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. -1655- - The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The variance is valid for one (1) year following its approval unless an extension is approved by the City Council pursuant to the City Code 350:530, Subd. 2 (E). The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted June 8, 2004 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk - 1 656- MINUTE EXCERPT.. MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 37 2004 CASE #04-09 VARIANCE REMODEL/ADDITION 1717 FINCH LANE - PHILIP BOWMAN The applicant requests a front yard variance to build a second level bedroom over the existing entry. The bedroom would cantilever 3 feet toward Finch Lane reducing the setback from 7 to 4 feet. In addition, the applicant will be residing the home to update its appearance. Staff recommends denial of the vadance with the following points of support: 1. The proposed setback of 4 feet further encroaches on the front yard setback. 2. It has not been adequately demonstrated that the proposed room addition could not be accommodated in some other manner that wouldn't exacerbate the existing conditions. 3. Other reasonable alternates may be available to accomplish the intended outcome. Discussion Ayaz asked to clarify if outgrowing a house creates a hardship? Gordon indicated that would be a self-imposed condition not a hardship by definition. Philip Bowman (applicant) - The house is about 100 years old. He feels the hardship is the reality of a third child. The additional bedroom is a minimal size. Miller observed that the impact on ti~ lake view for other Finch Lane residents would be significant. It was agreed that the look and usability of the house would be vastly improved. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Raines, to table action until May 17. MOTION carried unanimously. - 1657- :' MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION ,MAY 3, 2004 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #04-09 VARIANCE REMODEL/ADDITION 1717 FINCH LANE- PHILIP BOWMAN The applicant requests a front yard variance to build a second level bedroom over the existing entry. The bedroom would cantilever 3 feet toward Finch Lane reducing the setback from 7 to 4 feet. In addition, the applicant will be residing the home to update its appearance. Staff recommends denial of the variance with the following points of support: 1. The proposed setback of 4 feet further e~ches on the front yard setback. 2. It has not been adequately demonstrate~at the _p,r, oposed room addition could be accommodated in some other mannei~Wouldn t exacerbate the existing conditions. C~ 3. Other reasonable alternates ma~ailable to accomplish the intended outcome .Discussion Ayaz asked to clarify if outgrowing a house creates a hardship? Gordon indicated that would be a self-imposed condition not a hardship by definition. Philip Bowman (applicant) - The house is about 100 years old. He feels the hardship is the reality of a third child. The additional bedroom is a minimal size. Miller observed that the impact on the lake view for other Finch Lane residents would be significant. It was agreed that the look and usability of the house would be vastly improved. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Raines, to table action until May 17. MOTION carried unanimously. -1658- PLANNING REPORT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. lilll TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Loren Gordon, AICP DATE: May 13, 2004 SUBJECT: .REVISED Variance Request APPLICANT: Philip Bowman CASE NUMBERS: 04-09 HKG FILE NUMBER: 04-05 LOCATION: 1717 Finch Lane ZONING: R-lA Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: This item was tabled at the May 3rd Planning Commission meeting. The Commission tabled the case to allow the applicant more time to explore other addition options. The revised application proposes the existing 7 feet front yard setback be maintained in order to construct the second story room addition. The associated variance is as follows: Existing Proposed Required Variance Front yard 7 feet 7 feet 20 feet 13 feet The plans show that the room addition would measure 14'8" x 8'. Changes are reflected in the cantilevering of the second story over the north and south walls of the first story entry. A window box or bay window is also shown on the front wall of the addition. This is an allowable yard encroachment under Zoning Code Section 350:440 Subd. (3)(H) and is less than the maximum encroachment area of 8 square feet. DISCUSSION: The following discussion points are offered by Staff for consideration in making a recommendation. 1. The revised plan shows the second story addition maintaining the existing front yard 123 North ~d SWeet, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338~01~ Fax (612) 338-6838 -1659- ' p. 2 1717 Finch Lane - Variance May 13, 2004 setback established by the first story entry. 2. The addition is the minimum size needed to provide a functional bedroom. 3. The second addition is a logical expansion of bedroom space over an existing living area. 4. The addition maintains the character of the house without further impacting the street corridor. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend the Council approve the variance with the following conditions: 1. The City Engineer review grading and drainage issues, if applicable, at the time of building permit. 2. The applicant shall be responsible for the payment of all costs associated with the variance request. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for all necessary building permits. C 123 North Third Slreet, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 - 1660- Ma~ 13 04 10:51a P'~ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR · PHILIP g. BOWMAN OF LOTS 7 &: 8, BLOCK 13, DREAMWOOD HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA / ~o~ gXISTI~ LEG~ DESCRIPTI~ : Lots 7 ond 8, Block 13, DRE~ o : denotes iron ~rker georings shown ore besed upon on ess~d d~t~. Lot oreo - 7645 Sq. ft. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the ~bove described property, the location uf on existing house ond goroge, end the proposed Iocotion of severol proposed odditions thereon. It does not purport to show ~ny other i~rov~nts or encrooc~nts. This survey i~ bo~ed upon our drowing f~ ~0-26--89. -1661 - i I I -1662- -1663- Na~ 13 O~ ~0:52a -1664- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: April 21, 2004 Re: Submittal of Livable Communities Development Grant Application - Mound Visions Background I Recommendation Staff respectfully requests that the City Council approve the draft resolution which has been prepared to authorize submittal of a Livable Communities Development Grant application to the Metropolitan Council to request funding for the downtown redevelopment plan associated with the Mound Visions and MHRD project(s). If the Council recalls, a similar application was submitted in 2003 but was not selected for funding by the Met. Council. - 1665- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04- RESOLUTION A U TH O RIZI N GAP-PLICA_T_IOI~LF~3R_A DEVELOPMENT GRANT THROUGH THE LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Mound is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's Housing Incentives Program for 2004 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible to make application for funds under the Livable Communities Demonstration Account; and WHEREAS, the City has identified a proposed project within the City that meets the Demonstration Account's purposes and criteria; and WHEREAS, the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreements; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, agrees to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the development grant application submitted on ; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to apply to the Metropolitan Council for this funding on behalf of the City of Mound and to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of June 2004 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel - 1666- LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOST Development Grants Funding Criteria and Selection Process Funding Available in 2004:$7.5 Million Legislative Authority and Purpose: The Livable Communities Demonstration Account was established by the Livable Communities Act [Minnesota Statutes Chapter 473.25, (b)]. The Demonstration Account provides funds to development or redevelopment projects that connect development with transit, intensify land uses, connect housing and employment, provide a mix of housing affordability, and provide infrastructure to connect communities and attract investment. Program Goals: Consistent with regional policy in the 2030 Regional Development Framework, program goals for all communities are to: · Accommodate regional growth while using regional systems and land efficiently, · Increase transportation choices, · Appropriately mix land uses, · Increase the variety of housing types and costs, · Leverage private investment. Program goals for Developed and Developing Communities are: · Developed Communities: Invest Council resources to facilitate reinvestment--infill, adaptive reuse and redevelopment. · Developing Communities: Invest Council resources to support staged development, and centers with convenient access to transportation and transportation corridors. Funding Goals Funding goals are to support projects that will help meet these 2030 Regional Development Framework goals for all communities: · Develop land uses linked to the local and regional transportation systems. · Connect housing and centers of employment, education, retail and recreation uses · Develop a range of housing densities, types and costs. · Abate, prevent or remove point and nonpoint source pollution, and maximize groundwater recharge through surface water infiltration. Program focus and funding goals for Developed and Developing Communities: Developed Communities: Maintain, renew and improve infrastructure, buildings and land to provide developments that integrate land uses. Developing Communities: Accommodate growth, support centers along corridors, encourage connected land patterns for new development, and encourage the development of communities where shopping, jobs and a variety of housing choices co-exist by design. C:\~ I~v~topn~l ~ Crl~ia. doc - 1667- Eligible Applicants: Application is open to cities participating in the Local HoUSing Incentives Program ofthe Livable Communities Act, on behalf of proposals in their commurdties; or metropolitan counties on behalf o~- projects located in LCA participant communities. Applications Per City: Cities submitting more than one application per cycle (year) must prioritize them. ' Counties are not required to prioritize. Use of Funding. Funding wxll assxst commumtxes wxth xnfrastmcture and other hard costs for projects that are ready or will be ready within a year for construction. Eligible uses include site assembly, land acquisition, demolition and removal of obsolete structures on the site; new streets and sidewalks, structured parking. Eligible Uses of Funds: Grant funds may be used primarily for infrastructure, site preparation and construction costs--hard costs such as site assembly, acquisition, demolition and removal of obsolete buildings; new streets and sidewalks, structured parking. Funded project components must directly contribute to completion of a built or finished project, and reflect the goals of the program. Funded components will be evaluated in the context of individual projects. Ineligible Uses of Funds: City's administrative overhead, project coordination, activities prior to the start of the grant project; travel expenses; legal fees; local permits, licenses or authorization fees; costs associated with preparing other grant proposals; operating expenses; comprehensive planning costs; prorated lease and salary costs; pollution cleanup on the site; preparation of master plans or redevelopment plans; conducting design workshops, developing design standards; conducting market studies; developing zoning and land use implementation tools. Amount of AWards: No minimum or maximum award levels for projects have been established. The Metropolitan Council reserves the right to award less than the available funding in the grant cycle. Targeting of Funds: At least 30 percent of available funds will be targeted to cities located in the develoPing portion of the region. This is intended to encourage projects in the developing cities of the region, which have been underrepresented among LCDA-funded projects in the program's historY. Application Process: Submit 30 copies of the application and required attachments by June 30, 2004 to: Linda Milashius Metropolitan Council Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN. 55101 ...AND send one email copy of the application to linda, milashius~metc st2to mn lm (does not need to include attachments). -' Staff will send confu-mation of application's receipt. The application is available online at www. metrocouncil.org/grants/lcdaJdemoapp.doc. Questions? Please direct questions related to the application and review process to Linda Milashius at linda.milashius@metc.state.mn.un or 651.602.1541. For other questions, please contact your city's sector representative. C:~TEMPk2004 l>evelopmetnt ~ Crit~zSa. doc - 1668- Livable Communities Demonstration Account I Fact Sheet ,, Purpose: The Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) funds development and redevelopment projects that achieve connected development patterns linking housing, jobs and services; and maximize the development potential of existing infrastructure and regional facilities. Funding has been a catalyst that has enabled cities and developers to expand options available in the market, like ~sforming an outmoded shopping center into a neighborhood with new housing opportunities, neighborhood retail and commercial services, and public facilities. Funded projects include a variety of small-scale and large-scale developments throughout the region, serving as destinations for daily activities, such as work, errands, shopping and entertainment. Applications for LCDA funding are reviewed by the 17-member Livable Communities Advisory Committee, which makes funding recommendations to the Metropolitan Council. Committee expertise in local and county government, development and redevelopment, finance, urban planning and design, and transportation ensures that projects are evaluated in the context of both market demand and community need. Results 1996-December 2003: o:o The Council has awarded $49.75 million in grants. o1- 109 grants to 39 communities and three multi-city coalitions expected to: · Leverage over $1.47 billion in private development. · Leverage over $570 million in public investment. · Include 13,612 new and 618 rehabilitated housing units, including single-family houses, townhouses, condominiums, rental apartments for families and seniors, and live-work housing. Over 90 percent of the LCDA grant dollars have gone to projects that are being readied for construction. Funds have been awarded for property acquisition in areas to be redeveloped, new street infrastructure construction, pedestrian connections, structured parking, reclaimed and newly created green spaces and other uses. The remaining funds, in smaller "opportunity grants" ranging fi-om $10,000 to $150,000 with a 1:1 local match, have gone to cities to help shape projects that are in the predevelopment phase and show the potential to become demonstration projects. - 1669- Engineedng Planning · Surveying June 2,2004 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager CityofMound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound Lost Lake Greenway S.P. 145-090-01 TEAX 2700 (28) Partial Payment MFRA #13566 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Environmental Associates Payment Request No. 6 for work completed through May 31, 2004 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $156,261.95. We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director Enclosure s:knain:kmou 13566\correspondence\part-pay6-2 - 1670- 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mail: mfra@mfra, com zz~z -1671 - ...................... 8888888888888888888888888888888888888888~8~88888~ 8888888888888888888888888888888888888888~88888888 ........... ~ oo ..... ~ ~ooo~oooooooo~ooo oo~ooo m OObOObOObOoo~°°°°°°°~ooobobO ~ ~ ~ ~ oo oooo ~ ~o~ooo~ooooo ..... oo~ooo~oo ooo 8888882 88882 oo~ ..................... ~oo° ......... ~o .......... ~o8§o 88888888888888888888888~88888888~888888~8~888888 °°~°°oooooo~oo~ooooo 8888~°°°°°~8''' 888888888888~888~888888~88888888888888 - 1672- 888 ~ ~ ~ 88888888888888888888,888 ooo g § ooo ~ b ooobooo -1673- - 1674- Oobbobbbob 8~88~8888 8~~oo ~ bbobbobbbb ~ 8~88~888 boo'bbb ~ 8~88~8588 -1675- Engineering Planning · Surveying June 2, 2004 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound 2004 Street Reconstmction Pr~ect Partial Payment MFRA #14615 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Valley Paving's Payment Request No. 1 for work completed through May 31, 2004 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $165,494.32. We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director Carlton Moore, Public Works Director Enclosure s:h'nain:knou 14615Xcorrespondence\pan-pay6-2 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota . 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mail: mfra@mfra.com - - 1676- Z o ~ ~ z > ~ m ~ ~ ~0 m m Z m - 1677- 88888~8oo8oooo8 ~88888888°~o88888~o~ ..... ~ i> 8 88888~8o8ooooo8 ~ 88888°°888~8888888oo g gg 0 8888888888~8~°8 ~ ~ ........ ~' ~ ' ' ' oo88888888~o8oooo8 8 88 88888°°88888888oo g 888888888888888888 8 88 bbobbbbbbbbbbbb oobobbbbbbbbbb~oob Ob .... ~o ~ ~ ~ O~ 8888o88oooooooo 8 8~888888°°~°°~888oo oo 8 88 Ob - 1678- m -q .mr= - 1679- Engineering ° Planning · II , I,I, Surveying June 2, 2004 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound 2002 Retaining Wall Replacement Project Final Payment Request MFRA #13215 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Sunram's Final Payment Request for the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $5,817.85. We have reviewed the project and find that the work was completed in general accordance with the plans and specifications. It is our recommendation that the City Council accept the project and make final payment to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director Carlton Moore, Public Works Director Enclosure s:h-nain:Kmou13215kspecskfinal pay req6-2 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra.com - 1680- z ~ m~Z ~ omm~ 0 ooo~ z ZOO~ gzzg ~ Z - 1681 - - 1682- bb bb oob bbb bo m 08- ~z-c og >[ o m - 1683- T ~> Z G) m 0 m '"n ~ ~>~ ~ ~o --C m m~ m m [*9 BOARD MEMBERS Tom Skramstad Chair. Shorewood Katy Van HercKe Vice Chair, Minnetonka Jose Valdesuso Secretary, Excelsior Paul Knudsen Treasurer, Minnetrista Bob Ambrose Wayzata Doug Babcock Tonka Bay Crv Burma Mound Miles Canning Greenwood Bed Foster Deephaven Debbie Halvorson Orono Pete Nelson Victoria Tom Scanlon Spring Park Tom Seuntjens Minnetonka Beach Herb Suerth Woodland LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18338 MINNETONKA BLVD. · DEEPHAVEN, MINNESOTA 55391 · TELEPHONE 952/745-0789 · FAX 952/745-9085 Gregory S. Nybeck, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR May 27, 2004 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LMCD City Administrators LMCD Board Members Greg Nybeck, Executive Director Draft 2005 LMCD Budget Enclosed is a draft of the 2005 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) Budget for your review. A meeting has been scheduled in the LMCD office on Friday, June 4, 2004 at 12 NOON to review it and receive yourinput on it. A light lunch will be provided to those that attend. The proposed levy to the member cities ($261,294) would increase 6.9% when compared to the levy for the 2004 LMCD Budget ($244,453). The LMCD has held the levy forwarded to the member cities fiat for the past three years ($244,621 in 2002, $244,995 in 2003, and $244,453 in 2004). In the proposed 2005 LMCD Budget, we are planning increases in two primary areas. These include: t) Personnel Services (an additional $22,076 compared to 2004), and Zebra MuSSel Operational expenses (an additional $5,000 compared to 2004). The LMCD values your review and input on the draft 2005 LMCD Budget. If you are unable to attend this meeting and would like to comment on the draft 2005 LMCD Budget, please forward your comments to the LMCD office by Monday, June 21, 2004, My e-mail address is: .qnybeck~lmcd.or.q. Also enclosed is a copy of the 2003 LMCD Audit that was prepared by Abdo, Eick'& Meyers. It was reviewed and accepted by the LMCD Board of Directors at its May 12, 2004 Regular Meeting. Please RSVP to the LMCD office by 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday, June 2, 2004 if you plan to attend the June 4~h meeting so that we have an idea on the amount of food to order. Feel free to call me if you have questions or concerns relating to the draft 2005 LMCD Budget or the 2003 LMCD Audit. Ilook forward to your comments on the draft 2005 LMCD Budget. 50% Recycled Content 20% 'Post Consumer Waste Web Page Address: http://www.lmcd.org E-mail Address: Imcd @ imcd.org = 1685- ABDO EICK & ~ ~_~ MEYERS LLP Certified t:~blic Accountants & Consultants March 26, 2004 Grandview Square 5201 Eden Avenue Suite 370 Edina, MN 55436 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Mound, Minnesota We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Mound, Minnesota for the year ended December 31, 2003 and have issued our report thereon dated March 26, 2004. Professional standards require that we provide you with the following information related to our audit. Our Responsibility under Auditing Standards Generally Accepted in the United States of America and OMB Circular A-133 As stated in our engagement letter, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the £mancial statements are free of material misstatement and are fairly presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Because an audit is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance and because we did not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that material errors, fraud or illegal acts may exist and not be detected by us. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the City's internal control over £mancial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on internal control over financial reporting. We also considered internal control over compliance with requirements that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on compliance and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133. We noted certain matters involving the internal control and its operation that we consider to be reportable conditions under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Reportable conditions involve matters coming to our attention relating to significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control that, in our judgment, could adversely affect the City's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the general purpose financial statements. We noted the following reportable condition. Segregation of Duties Our study and evaluation disclosed that because of the limited size of your office staff, the City has limited segregation of duties. Good internal control contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from inception to completion. While we recognize that the City is not large enough to permit an adequate segregation of duties in all respects, it is important, however, that you be aware of this condition. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the general purpose f'mancial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all matters in internal control that might be reportable conditions and, accordingly, would not necessarily disclose all reportable conditions that are also considered to be material weaknesses as del'reed above. However, the reportable condition described above is not believed to be a material weakness. 952.835.9090 ° Fax 952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Two Ag part of obtaining reagonable agguranee about whether the City'g financial gtatementg are free of material mismtement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants, non-compliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit. Also, in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, we examined, on a test basis, evidence about the City's compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement applicable to each of its major federal programs for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the City's compliance with those requirements. While our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion, it does not provide a legal determination on the City's compliance with those requirements. We noted no instances of non-compliance. Significant Accounting Policies Management has the responsibility for selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. In accordance with the terms of our engagement letter, we will advise management about the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 to the general purpose financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during 2003. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year that were both significant and unusual, and of which, under professional standards, we are required to inform you, or transactions for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. Accounting Estimates Accounting estimates are an integral part of the combined financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the general purpose financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most significant estimate affecting the f'mancial statements was depreciation on fixed assets. Management's estimate of depreciation is based on estimated useful lives of the assets. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop this estimate in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Audit Adjustments For purposes of this letter, professional standards defme an audit adjustment as a proposed correction of the combined £mancial statements that, in our judgment, may not have been detected except through our auditing procedures. An audit adjustment may or may not indicate matters that could have a significant effect on the City's financial reporting process (that is, cause furore financial statements to be materially misstated). In our judgment, none of the adjustments we proposed, whether recorded or unrecorded by the City, either individually or in the aggregate, indicate matters that could have a significant effect on the City's financial reporting process. We noted no uncorrected misstatements. Disagreements with Management For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, concerning a financial accounting, reporting or auditing matter that could be significant to the general purpose financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. 952.835.9090 · Fax 952.835.3261 www.aemcpas.com City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Three Consultations with Other Independent Accountants In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. Ifa consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the City's general purpose f'mancial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. Issues Discussed Prior to Retention of Independent Auditors We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing our audit. 952.835.9090 · Fax952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Four Other Matters The following are areas that came to our attention during the audit that we feel should be reviewed: Financial Position and Results of Operations General Fund The general fund is used to account for resources traditionally associated with government, which are not required legally or by sound principal management to be accounted for in another fund. The general fund balance increased $288,682 from 2002. Overall, the fund balance of $2,142,752 is 53 percent of the 2004 budgeted expenditures. The unreserved undesignated portion totals $1,422,542 and the amounts designated for severance pay and park dedication fee total $201,993 and $136,387, respectively. There is $381,830 reserved for payment on the revenue bonds at year end. The unreserved undesignated portion is 35 percent of 2004 budgeted expenditures. We recommend the fund balance be maintained at a level sufficient to fund operations until the major revenue sources are received in June. We feel a reserve of approximately 40 to 50 percent of planned expenditures and transfers out is adequate to meet working capital and small emergency needs. At the current level, the fund balance is within the range of what is generally recommended as a minimum. The Minnesota Office of the State Auditor has classified cities' unreserved fund balance levels relative to expenditures as follows: Extremely low Under 20% Low 21 - 34 Acceptable 35 - 50 Moderately high 51 - 64 High 65 - 100 Very high 101 - 150 Extremely high Above 150 The State Auditor does group all general and special revenue funds of the city when making this calculation where our calculation is based only on the general fund. Although there is no legislation regulating fund balance, it is a good policy to designate intended use of fund balance. This helps address citizen concerns as to the use of fund balance and tax levels. 952.835.9090 · Fax 952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Five A table summarizing the general fund balance in relation to budget follows: Year 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 Fund Balance Following Year Budget 2,142,752 1,863,198 1,546,659 1,202,039 1,191,456 $ 4,066,510 3,837,750 3,485,690 3,253,840 3,074,750 Fund Balance as a Percent of Budget 53% 48 44 37 39 Fund Balance as a Percent of Next Year's Budget $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,5OO,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $- $3,837,750 $4,066,510 $3,074,750 $3,253,840 $3,485,690 ~ vA ~ 48% 53% 39% 37% 44% 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Fund Balance --l-- Budget I 952.835.9090 · Fax952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com ,,Il, .ll. ,,llll & ~1 I& i,,, City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Six The purposes and benefits of a general fund balance are as follows: Purposes and Benefits Expenditures are incurred somewhat evenly throughout the year. However, property tax and state aid revenues are not received until the second half of the year. An adequate fund balance will provide the cash flow required to finance the general fund expenditures. The City is vulnerable to legislative actions at the State and Federal level. The State eliminated HACA aid with the 2001 legislative session and imposed reductions of market value credit aid and local government aid for some cities. Levy limits have also been implemented for municipalities in past legislative sessions. An adequate fund balance will provide a temporary buffer against those aid adjustments and levy limits. Expenditures not anticipated at the time the annual budget was adopted may need immediate council action. These would include capital outlay replacement, lawsuits and other items. An adequate fund balance will provide the fmancing needed for such expenditures. · A strong fund balance will assist the City in maintaining, improving or obtaining a bond rating. The 2003 operations are summarized as follows: Budget Actual Variance - Favorable (Unfavorable) Revenue Expenditures $ 3,493,170 $ 4,017,592 $ 524,422 3,626,960 3,475,175 151,785 Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures (133,790) 542,417 676,207 Other financing uses Operating transfers out (203,350) (253,735) (50,385) Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other £manclng sources over expenditures and other financing uses $ (337,140) 288,682 $ 625,822 Fund balance, January 1 Equity transfer out 1,863,198 (9,128) Fund balance, December 31 $ 2,142,752 · The largest item of variance on the revenue side was taxes. This item had a favorable variance of $291,715 or 56 percent of the total revenue variance. · The largest item of variance in expenditures was culture and recreation. This item had a favorable variance of $110,665. The remaining categories were relatively close to budget. 952.835.9090 · Fax952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Seven A comparison between 2003 and 2002 revenue and operating transfers is presented below: Percent Percent of of Revenue source 2003 Total 2002 Total Increase (Decrease) from2002 Taxes $ 2,681,785 66.75% $ 2,191,167 Licenses and permits 263,442 6.56 274,061 Intergovernmental 520,537 12.96 661,365 Charges for services 240,545 5.99 233,556 Fines and forfeits 109,941 2.73 96,754 Interest on investments 14,662 .36 12,629 Miscellaneous 186,680 4.65 117,824 Operating transfers in 128,000 Total revenue and transfers $ 58.98% 7.38 17.80 6.29 2.59 .34 3.17 3.45 4,017,592 100.00% $ 3,715,356 100.0~0% $ 490,618 (10,619) (140,828) 6,989 13,187 2,033 68,856 028,000) $ 302,236 A graphical presentation of 2003 revenue totals follows: 2003 Revenue Taxes 66.75% Miscellaneous 4.65% Interest on investments 0.36% Fines and forfeits Charges 2.73% for services 5.99% Intergovernmental 12.96% Licenses and permits 6.56% 952.835.9090 · Fax 952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Eight A comparison between 2003 and 2002 expenditures and transfers is presented below: Percent Percent Increase of of (Decrease) Programs 2003 Total 2002 Total from 2002 General govemment $ 874,023 23.44% $ 810,743 23.85% $ 63,280 Public safety Police protection 1,183,492 31.74 1,037,552 30.53 145,940 Planning and inspection 311,538 8.35 358,705 10.55 (47,167) Civil defense 3,306 .09 6,540 .19 (3,234) Public works 569,980 15.29 522,253 15.37 47,727 Culture and recreation 222,565 5.97 213,524 6.28 9,041 Miscellaneous 59,091 1.58 64,488 1.90 (5,397) Capital outlay 229,387 6.15 155,379 4.57 74,008 Debt service 21,793 .58 21,793 .64 Operating transfers out 253,735 6.81 207,840 6.12 45,895 Total expendituresandtransfers $ 3,728,910 100.00% $ 3,398,817 100.00% $ 330,093 A graphical presentation of 2003 expenditure and transfer totals by program follows: 2003 Expenditures Operating transfers out 6.81% Debt service 0.58% Capital outlay 6.15% Miscellaneous 1.58% Culture and recreation 5.97% General government 23.44% Public safety 40.18% Public works 15.29% 952.835.9090 · Fax 952.835.3261 www.aemcpas.com City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Nine Special Revenue Funds Special revenue funds are used to account for revenue derived from specific taxes or other earmarked revenue sources. They are usually required by statute or local ordinance to finance particular functions or activities of government. A comparison of 2003 and 2002 fund balances follows: Special Revenue Fund Balances (Deficit) $350,000 $300,0OO $25O,OOO $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $- $(50,000) 12003 12002 Cemetery $(4,848) Community Area Fire Development Service Block Grant Dock HRA $- $99,976 $153,072 $320,879 $- $196,507 $134,789 $252,079 952.835.9090 · Fax952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com City of Motmd March 26, 2004 Page Ten Debt Service Funds Governmental accounting does not match the assets of each debt service fund with the outstanding debt to be retired by each fund. The following is intended to provide that information. Cash and Temporary Total Bonds Investments Assets Outstanding Maturi _ty Commerce Place Tax Increment G.O. Bonds 2001-A G.O. Bonds 2001-C G.O. Bonds 2003-A G.O. Bonds 2003-C 2002 HRA Revenue Bonds $ 11,198$ 11,198 $ 180,000 2004 20,758 21,421 247,759 2022 122,904 194,074 745,000 2022 229,549 898,035 3,255,000 2024 15,260 17,538 2,300,000 2023 8,225 7,415,192 6,860,000 2024 Total $ 407,894 $ 8,557,458 $ 13,587,759 The bond issues will be paid with tax increment collections, property taxes or special assessments or a combination of those sources. The 2001-A Bonds also contain a storm water and water utility component. The liability for these bonds is recorded in the respective enterprise fund. 952.835.9090" Fax 952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Eleven Capital Projects Funds The capital projects funds are used to account for the acquisition and construction of major capital facilities other than those financed by enterprise funds. Included in this group of funds and the fund balance of each at December 31 for 2002 and 2001 is as follows: Capital Projects Fund Balances (Deficit) $6,000,000 $5,OOO,OOO $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $- $(1,000,000) $(2,000,000)- $(3,000,000) 12003 12002 Central HRA 2002 Capital Sealcoat Municipal State Business TIF 1-2 Public Safety Improvements Aid District Building $3,125,449 $67,041 $20,220 $4,264 $639,623 $2,067,157 $1,365,752 $67,259 $16,779 $3,796 $(2,017,035) $5,474,816 The Tax Increment 1-2 has incurred significant capital costs since 1999. Interfund borrowing was completed between the water, sewer and general funds to cover the fund deficit and bonds were issued in 2003 to eliminate the deficit. These loans will be repaid when tax increment revenue is received over the next eight years. The 2003 tax increment was $110,725. 952.835.9090 · Fax952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Twelve Enterprise Funds Liquor Fund A comparison of the past four years liquor fund operations is as follows: Liquor Fund Summary $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1'500'000 ~ $1,000,000 -- j ~ 23.5% 24.5% 24.5% ~ 23.2% $500,000 -- .~, ~,~ ~ 10.7% 7.3% 1.4% (3.1)% $(500,000) 2000 2001 2002 2003 Sales $1,861,914 $1,899,857 $1,881,175 $2,099,734 "~l~ Gross profit $455,366 $465,007 $442,556 $487,236 Income (loss) before transfer $199,705 $138,235 $26,831 $(65,425) '"'~"~ Cash balance $480,367 $1,429,490 $599,145 $2,241 The key operating margins have declined since 2001. Gross profit has decreased over one percent. We expect this ratio to stay consistent and a decline can indicate lack of updated pricing or possible shrinkage. A target income should be about 10 percent of sales. Now that the new store has been in operation management should reevaluate its expectations for gross profit and income before transfers since payments of bond principal and interest are now required and operating expenses have steadily increased. 952.835.9090 ° Fax 952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Thirteen Water Fund A comparison of the past four years water utility operations is as follows: Water Fund $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $(200,0o0) 2000 2001 2002 2003 Operating revenue $467,680 $480,467 $608,703 $613,653 Operating expense $420,255 $494,771 $557,538 $590,322 ~l~'Income (loss) from operations $47,425 $(14,304) $51,165 $23,331 Cash and investments $759,529 $ 872,420 $721,145 $1,472,138 The large increase in cash in 2003 is the result of unspent bond proceeds and the repayment of an interfund loan. Although the income from operations is positive, annual debt service payments have been approximately $90,000 each year and will go up as a result of new debt issued. Repayment of debt requires that positive cash flow from operations be generated to meet these obligations. The City will continue to monitor operations to ensure that cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet operating costs and debt service payments. 952.835.9090 ° Fax 952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Fourteen Sewer Fund A comparison of the past four years Sewer utility operations is as follows: Sewer Fund $1,400,000 $1'200'000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 '~~/~~~ll~~~ $- 2000 2001 2002 2003 .--~-' Operating revenue $998,870 $1,080,344 $1,035,487 $1,142,893 · '1~ Operating expense $781,222 $928,175 $968,307 $1,045,174 '-18~Income (loss) bom operations $217,648 $152,169 $67,180 $97,719 ~Cash and investments $838,166 $525,820 $691,207 $1,148,922 Like the Water fund, the Sewer fired cash increase resulted from unspent bond proceeds and payment received from an interfimd loan. City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Fifteen Recycling The Recycling fund has a cash balance of $34,264 at December 31, 2003. Its operating results are stable since the majority of the expense is paid to a contractor on a monthly basis and is a fixed amount. Storm Water The Storm Water fund was established in 2001 and is responsible for $760,000 in bonds issued during 2001. It will be important to annually monitor rates to ensure they are sufficient to meet the debt service needs. The current cash balance is $299,619. HRA - Public Housing The public housing was incorporated into the City's report for the £ncst time in 2002. The cash balance of $89,805 is adequate for operations. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements - and Management's Discussion and Analysis - for State and Local Governments We have discussed GASB Statement No. 34 in detail in our management letter each of the last three years. This statement is a major overhaul in the way government financial statements look and the information contained within. It is intended to make the City's annual financial report more user fxiendly for citizens, staff, Council and those that provide resources to the City. We are prepared to offer assistance and direction on implementation but staff and council can fred many resources relating to Statement No. 34 on GASB's web site (gasb.org). We have discussed some of the items needing preparation in advance of implementation with your staff and listed below are some key dates and activities: Statement implementation date: Items needing completion by City: Infrastructure asset inventory: Capital asset inventory: Program revenue assignments Management Discussion and Analysis Letter (MD&A): Year ending, December 31, 2004 Year ending, December 31, 2004 Complete Year ending, December 31, 2004 Year ending, December 31, 2004 We have completed GASB Statement No. 34 conversions for several entities over the last year. Our experience indicates that there is a significant increase in time to complete the audit if there has not been sufficient preparation. We recommend scheduling a planning meeting in the summer to ensure that the City is on track for meeting the requirements of GASB Statement No. 34. We will contact you in June or July to schedule a meeting if you determine one is necessary. In advance of year end, we will need to convert the fmancial statements to the new reporting format. We will prepare an engagement letter in order to facilitate this process over the summer. 952.835.9090 · Fax952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com ,1, ,,J, ,,Ill a, ,l, , City of Mound March 26, 2004 Page Sixteen This information is intended solely for the information and use of management, Council and the Minnesota Office of the State Auditor and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. Our audit would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system because it was based on selected tests of the accounting records and related data. The comments and recommendations in the report are purely constructive in nature, and should be read in this context. If you have any questions or wish to discuss any of the items contained in this letter, please feel free to contact us at your convenience. We wish to thank you for the oppommity to be of service and for the courtesy and cooperation extended to us by your staff. March 26, 2004 Minneapolis, Minnesota ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP Certified Public Accountants 952.835.9090 · Fax 952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com Z .-I o o -.~0 m® ", Z Q. 5'x ~ Z ~' ~ o ~ ~ X · . ~ z ~ Z (.O 0'1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ,~; < ~ X ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 686- Z Z I~m o,-! u~O 0 Z mm mm ('3 ~..~ o o"~ ~o0 I~ ~o o~ oooo JO ~0000~ ~0 O0 O0 ¢.~0 0 O0 lCD' OOC:.CDO0 ~,;~0 bbb bb i~ bbb i~ b bb'~ ~00000 ~,~0000000~0 O.l~. 00000 ,,~0000000..1~ - 1687- o~ ~o-4 "ri"" ~o Z~ I; o 0000 ' o 'o~ ~ CD O0 o o ~oooo° 0°88 8o°8 C, O0 ooo § gg 0000 0000 0 (.O 0'~ (DO) O~ G0 f.~ 0 -- 0000000000000 ~ o~ooogg~ {~ 0000000000000 ~ - 1688- ooo oooo I~ ° ° ~o~8~88 000 0000 0 0 O0 ooo 8888 o o ooooo - 1689- - - 1690- 0 ~ ~.~ 0000~ 00~ m - 1691 - "o;~ 'om ~Z - 1692- ABDO EICK& Cert.-ted Publ/c Accountants & Consu/mn~ Febma_ry5,2004 Grandview Square 5201 Eden Avenue Suite 370 Edina, MN 55436 Board of Directors Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Deephaverh Minnesota We have audited the financial statements of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (the District) for the year ended December 31, 2003 and have issued our report thereon dated February 5, 2004. Professional standards require that we provide you with the following information related to our audit. Our Responsibility Under Auditing Standards Generally Accepted in the United States of America As stated in our engagement letter, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatement and are fairly presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because an audit is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute assurance and because we did not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that material errors, fraud, or other illegal acts may exist and not be detected by us. In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the District for the year ended December 31, 2003, we considered its internal control in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control. However, we noted certain matters involving the internal control and its operation that we consider to be reportable conditions under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Reportable conditions involve matters coming to our attention relating to significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control that, in our judgment, could adversely affect the District's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the financial statements. We noted the following reportable condition. Segregation of Duties Our study and evaluation disclosed that because of the limited size of your office staff, the District has limited segregation of duties. A good internal control structure contemplates an adequate segregation of duties so that no one individual handles a transaction from inception to completion. While we recognize that your District is not large enough to permit an adequate segregation of duties in all respects, it is important, however, that you be aware of this condition. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all ma~ters in internal control that might be reportable conditions and, accordingly, would not necessarily disclose all reportable conditions that are also considered to be material weaknesses as defined above. However, the reportable condition described above is not believed to be a material weakness. As part of obta~,ing reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. However, the objective of our tests was not to provide an opinion on compliance with such provisions. We noted no instances of noncompliance. 952.835.9090 * Fax952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com - 1693- " Lake Minnetonka Conservation District February 5, 2004 Page Two Significant Accounting Policies Management has the responsibility for selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. In accordance with the terms of our engagement letter, we will advise management about the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. The significant accounting policies used by the District are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. The District implemented the requirements of Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34 during 2003. We noted no transactions entered into by the District during the year that were both significant and unusual, and of which, under professional standards, we are required to inform you, or transactions for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. Accounting Estimates Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. Audit Adjustments For purposes of this letter, professional standards define an audit adjustment as a proposed correction of the financial statements that, in our judgment, may not have been detected except through our auditing procedures. An audit adjustment may or may not indicate matters that could have a significant effect on the District's financial reporting process (that is, cause future financial statements to be materially misstated). We had no unadjusted audit differences. Disagreements with Management For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, concerning a financial accounting, reporting or auditing matter that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. Consultations with Other Independent Accountants In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the District's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. Issues Discussed Prior to Retention of Independent Auditors We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the District's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing our audit. 952.835.9090 · Fax952.835.3261 www. flemcpfls.com - 1694- Lake Miunetonka Conservation District February 5, 2004 Page Three Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34 As mentioned previously, the District has implemented GASB Statement No. 34 for the December 31, 2003 f'mancial statements. The main change resulting from the implementation was issuing financial statements under a new reporting model. The main features of this model are summarized below: Narrative analysis through the Management Discussion & Analysis (MD&A) letter on pages I through V. · Government-wide financial reporting that builds upon traditional fund based financial statements. The Government-wide financial statement on pages 3 and 4 are intended to give a more concise view of the government as a single unified entity. · More long-term focus for governmental activities. The District now has f'Lxed assets on its Statement of Net Assets for Governmental Activities. The addition of this information should help direct users to a long-term view of the financial data. · A distinction between major and non-major funds. More information is provided on individual funds that meet the criteria to be included as major funds. All funds of the district are presented as major. · Budgeting analysis that considers both the adopted and final budget. 952.835.9090 ° Fax 952.835.3261 www.aemcpaS.com -1695- -' Lake Minnetonka Conservation District February 5, 2004 Page Four Other Matters The following are items that came to our attention during the audit that we feel should be reviewed. Financial Position and Results of Operations General Fund The fund balance increased $49,483 to $190,553 at December 31, 2003. The total fund balance represents 55 percent of the 2004 budget. The District has designated $22,000 of the fund balance for a management plan to be conducted in 2004. With this designation removed the undesignated fund balance is 49 percent of the 2004 budget. We recommend a minimum fund balance for working capital be approximately 30 percent to 50 percent ofplarmed expenditures. A table summarizing the general fund balance in relation to budget follows: Fund Following Balance Fund Year as a Percent Year Balance Budget of Budget 2003 $ 190,553 $ 345,953 55% 2002 141,070 317,295 45 2001 125,684 305,543 41 2000 103,730 280,433 37 1999 111,300 285,679 39 $400,000 $350,000 $300,000 $250,000 $20O,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $- Fund Balance as a Percent of Next Year's Budget $305,543 $317,295 $345,953 $285,679 $280,433 55% 39% 37% 41% 45% 1999 2000 2001 Fund Balance + Budget 2002 2003 952.835.9090 · Fax 952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com - q 696- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District February 5, 2004 Page Five Special Revenue Funds The special revenue funds account for revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes (not including major capital projects). These funds include the Save the Lake fund, New Equipment Acquisition fund, Eurasian Milfoil fund and the Equipment Replacement fund. The Save the Lake fund and the New Equipment Acquisition fund are funded only through donations and interest income. The following table summarizes the change in the fund balance for each special revenue fund. Fund Balance (Deficit) Increase Fund 12/31/03 12/31/02 (Decrease) Save the Lake Designated for: Water patrol project $ 8,933 $ 8,433 $ 500 Purchase from donated funds 237,442 223,647 13,795 (9,579) 100,305 (109,884) New Equipment Acquisition Eurasian Milfoil 91,166 74,452 16,714 Equipment Replacement 187,696 184,426 3,270 Total 591.263 The deficit in the new equipment acquisition fund should be eliminated with a transfer from another fund. 952.835.9090 * Fax952.835.3261 www. aemcpas.com - 1697- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District February 5, 2004 Page Six This report is intended solely for the information and use of management and Board of Directors and the Minnesota Office of the State Auditor, and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. Our audit would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system because it was based on selected tests of the accounting records and related data. The comments and recommendations in the report are purely constructive in nature, and should be read in this context. If you have any questions or wish to discuss any of the items contained in this letter, please feel free to contact us at your convenience. We wish to thank you for the opportunity to be of service and for the courtesy and cooperation extended to us by your staff. February 5, 2004 Minneapolis, Minnesota ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP Certified Public Accountants 952.835.9090 · Fax952.835.3261 www. aemepas.eom - 1698- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Memorandum To: From: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director June 3, 2004 Request for Subdivision Exemption and Reconveyance of Portions of Tax Forfeited Lands to the. State of Minnesota by a Governmental Subdivision (PID No. 19-117-23-24-0047) Background In May 2003, the Mound City Council adopted Resolution No. 03-45 authorizing Hennepin County to begin the process to release a portion of a tax forfeit parcel (PID No. 19-117-23-24-0047) which is legally described as Lot 18 and Lots 29 to 32 inclusive, Block 24, "Seton" following submittal of a wdtten request by three property owners (Mark and Gall Hanus, Jack and Sandy Cook and Bruce and Sharon Johnson) and review and recommendation by the Planning Commission, the Parks and Open Space Commission and Docks Advisory Commission. The portion of the tax-forfeit parcel under discussion is described as follows: That part of Lot 29, Block 24, "Seton" lying easterly of the northerly extension of the west line of the east 10 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, Avalon Following submittal of the resolution to Hennepin County, it was determined that special legislation would be necessary to complete the release process in order to sell the property at an adjacent owner auction. As stated in the February 26, 2004 letter from Hennepin County Taxpayer Services, the City was notified that following enactment of the special legislation, the City would need to execute a deed to reconvey the affected portion of the tax-forfeited parcel back to the State of Minnesota so that it may be offered for sale to the adjacent owners. Members of the Council are advised that Staff was notified by Hennepin County earlier this week that the special legislation was signed by Governor Pawlenty on May 29, 2004. In summary, the act becomes effective the day following final enactment and upon delivery by the City of Mound to the Hennepin County Auditor a Deed Reconveying Portions of Tax-Forfeited Land to the State of Minnesota for that portion described in the law that may be sold by Hennepin County. - 1699- Subdivision Exemption Provision If the City Council recalls, the subdivision ordinance was amended in 2003 to include a provision entitled" Subdivision Exemption" which reads as follows: "In any case in which compliance with Subparagraph A (Minor Boundary Adjustment) and B (VVaiver of Platting) will result in an unnecessary hardship to the property owner and the request is not contrary to the platting regulations, the City Council may waive such compliance by adoption of a resolution to that effect and the conveyance may then be recorded. The Council may, at its option, refer such questions to the Planning Commission for recommendation before action." Following sale of the subject parcel by Hennepin County to the abutting property owners, additional survey work is going to be necessary so as to combine the affected portion(s) of the former tax forfeit parcel with the abutting Hanus/Cook/Johnson properties which triggers the minor subdivision process. Therefore, it seems reasonable that use of the subdivision exemption provision for this portion of the process may be appropriate. In the event the Council determines that the use of the subdivision exemption provision is not appropriate for this case, the land division request would need to be reviewed as a minor subdivision which would require Planning Commission and City Council review and approval. Additional Information There is no approved fee / escrow deposit for the Subdivision Exemption request in the City's land use fee schedule. Staff would recommend that the application fee for waiver of platting be required. 2. As stated in Resolution No. 03-45, the Planning Commission recommends that the subdivision should be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. Requested Action(s) Staff recommends that the City Council approve a Subdivision Exemption to subdivide the portion of the tax forfeit parcel which has been authorized for reconveyance to the State of Minnesota following approval of the special legislation which occurred on May 29, 2004 subject to the following condition(s): A. Payment of all consultant fees associated with the processing of the request. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Reconveyance of Tax Forfeited Lands to the State of Minnesota by a Governmental Subdivision for the following described property: · Page 2 -1700- That part of Lot 29, Block 24,"Seton" lying easterly of the northerly extension of the west line of the east 10 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, Avalon · Page 3 - 1701 - DRAFT CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 04- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION REQUEST TO RELEASE A PORTION OF A TAX FORFEIT PARCEL PID NO. PID No. 19-117-23-24-0047 WHEREAS, the Mound City Council approved Resolution No. 03-45 on May 13, 2003 authorizing Hennepin County to begin the process to release portion of a tax-forfeit parcel to be offered to sale to three abutting properties owned by Mark and Gall Hanus, Jack and Sandy Cook and Bruce and Sharon Johnson; and WHEREAS, the involved portion of the tax forfeit parcel is described as follows: That part of Lot 29, Block 24,"Seton" lying easterly of the northerly extension of the west line of the east 10 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, Avalon WHEREAS, following submittal of the resolution to Hennepin County, it was determined that special legislation would be necessary to complete the release process to sell the property at an adjacent owner auction; and WHEREAS, the special legislation involving the subject property was approved and signed by the Governor on May 29, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City needs to reconvey the involved portion of the tax-forfeit parcel back to the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, subdivision approval by the City of Mound as set forth in City Code Chapter 330 is required; and - 1702- WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 330 was amended in 2003 to include a provision entitled "Subdivision Exemption" which reads as follows: "In any case in which compliance with City Code Chapter 330:10 Subparagraph A (Minor Boundary Adjustment) and City Code Chapter 330:10 Subparagraph B (Waiver of Platting) will result in an unnecessary hardship to the property owner and the request is not contrary to the platting regulations, the City Council may waive such compliance by adoption of a resolution to that effect and the conveyance may then be recorded. The Council may, at its option, refer such questions to the Planning Commission for recommendation before action." ; and WHEREAS, following release and sale of the subject property to the abutting owners, additional survey work is going to be necessary so as to combine the affected portion(s) of the former tax forfeit parcel with the abutting lots therefore triggering the minor subdivision process which will require Planning Commission and City Council review and approval therefore use of the Subdivision Exemption provision at this time is appropriate. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City does hereby approve the subdivision exemption subject to the following conditions: A. Payment of a $250.00 application fee. B. Payment of all consultant fees associated with the processing of the request. This subdivision exemption request is hereby approved for the following described property: Refer to Exhibit A The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: - 1703- Adopted June 8, 2004 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk - 1704- DRAFT CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 04- RESOLUTION TO RECONVEY A PORTION OF A TAX FORFEIT PARCEL BACK TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR SALE TO ABUTTING OWNERS PID NO. PID No. 19-117-23-24-0047 WHEREAS, the Mound City Council approved Resolution No. 03-45 on May 13, 2003 authorizing Hennepin County to begin the process to release a portion of a tax-forfeit parcel to be offered to sale to three abutting properties owned by Mark and Gall Hanus, Jack and Sandy Cook and Bruce and Sharon Johnson; and WHEREAS, the involved portion of the tax forfeit parcel is described as follows: That part of Lot 29, Block 24,"Seton" lying easterly of the northerly extension of the west line of the east 10 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, Avalon WHEREAS, following submittal of the resolution to Hennepin County, it was determined that special legislation would be necessary to complete the release process to sell the property at an adjacent owner auction; and WHEREAS, the special legislation involving the subject property was approved and signed by the Governor on May 29, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City needs to reconvey the involved portion of the tax-forfeit parcel back to the State of Minnesota so as to proceed with an adjacent owner sale of the subject property; and WHEREAS, subdivision exemption approval by the City of Mound as set forth in City Code Chapter 330 was granted; and - 1705- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City does hereby approve the Reconveyance of Tax Forfeited lands to State of Minnesota by a Governmental Subdivision as described below: That part of Lot 29, Block 24,"Seton" lying easterly of the northerly extension of the west line of the east 10 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, Avalon The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted June 8, 2004 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk - 1706- From:DOUGLAS MANUFAOTURING 952 882 6232 06/02/2004 07:53 ~}18 P.002/003 City Council Date: Case No. Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. PROPERTY INFO Subject Address None_A~signed EXISTING LEGAL Lot(s)__Lot 29 Block 24 Subdivision _Seton DESCRIPTION PID~ Plat # PROPOSED A. Lot(s) See attachment Block LEGAL B. Lot(s). Block DESCRIPTION ZONING Circle: R-1 ~ R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 DISTRICT PROPERTY Are there existing structures on the property? yes /~ Do the existing structures comply with the zoning ordinance for setbacks, hardcover, etc.? yes / no APPLICANT The applicant is: owner ~other:__Applicant to purchase tax forfeit property Name Mark Hanus Address__~.~.~.S Denbigh Rd. Mound, Mn. 55364 Phone (H)_952-472-5460 (W)_952-882-6211 Fax OWNER Name State of Minnesota (if other than Address applicant) Phone (H) (W) Fax SURVEYOR/ Name Hennepin County Taxpayer Services ENGINEER Address Phone (H) 0/V) Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( X ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the. purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. ~ ~/~ Applicant Signature v . , Date_6-1-04 Owner's Signature See attachment Date "- 1707- From:DOUGLAS MANUFACTURING 952 882 8232 , ~, , l,, , II Ii, 06/02/2004 07:59 ¢K)18 P.003/003 ATTACHMENT TO SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION APPLICATION Denbigh Road Tax Forfeit Property Proposed Legal Description: That part of Lot 29, Block 24, "Seton", lying easterly of the northerly extension of the west line of the east 10 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, Avalon. Signature of owners: There is no signature of owners. This is because the owners of the parcel is the State of Minnesota due to non-payment of taxes. The State has approved this subdivision and sale by the passage of HF2334 in both the House and Senate and also by the signature of the Governor of Minnesota on 5-29-04. The applicable portion of the bill is Article 3, Sect. 17 of HF2334. ,.4 CERTIFICATE City of Mound STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and the Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby attest and certify that: 1. As such officer, I have the legal custody of the original record from which the attached and forgoing extract was transcribed. 2. I have carefully compared said extract with said original record. 3. I find said extract to be a true, correct and complete transcript from the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held of the date indicted in said extract, including any resolution adopted at such meeting, insofar as they relate to: RESOLUTION NO. 03-45 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING HENNEPIN COUNTY TO BEGIN PROCESS TO RELEASE PORTION OF TAX FORFEIT PARCEL PID #19-117-23-24-0047 Said meeting was duly held, pursuant to call and notice thereof as required by law on the 13th day of May, 2003. WITNESS my hand officially as such Clerk, and the seal of said City, this 28th day of May, 2003. Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -1709- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 03-45 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING HENNEPIN COUNTY TO BEGIN PROCESS TO RELEASE PORTION OF TAX-FORFEIT PARCEL PID # 19-117-23-24-0047 WHEREAS, the City of Mound received a request from Mark and Gail Hanus, Jack and Sandy Cook and Bruce and Sharon Johnson whose properties are located at 4446- 4458 Denbigh Road on March 18, 2003, requesting a determination from the City Council whether or not it would authorize release of a portion of a tax-forfeit parcel that lies between the applicants' extended side lot lines and the 929.4 Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). WHEREAS, the applicants would like to purchase the involved portion of the tax-forfeit lot as they have private docks located on the property; and WHEREAS, the subject parcel is described by Hennepin County Taxpayer Services as PID # 19-117-23-24-0047; and WHEREAS, the request, including all applicable background information, was routed to all involved City departments for review and comment; and WHEREAS, no objections or concerns were received from the City departments; and WHEREAS, the request was referred to the Parks and Open Space Commission for review at its April 10, 2003 meeting who recommended to the City Council that it should be authorized for release by Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, the request was referred to the Docks and Commons Advisory Commission for review at its April 17, 2003 meeting who recommended to the Council that it should be authorized for release by Hennepin County; and - -1710- Resolution No. 02-45 WHEREAS, the request was referred to the Planning Commission for review its April 21, 2003 meeting who voted 5 to 2 to recommend to the Council that it should be authorized for released by Hennepin County on the condition(s) that it be sold to adjacent property owners only and that the subdivision' comes-before~'~-Planning- Commission and City Council for formal review and approval; and WHEREAS, City of Mound Resolution No. 84-94 includes a policy regarding assessments placed on tax-forfeit properties which states that the City will certify any assessments to Hennepin County when the lots are released for private sale to adjoining property owners which allows the City to receive 80% of the value of the property to applied towards outstanding assessments under certain conditions; and WHEREAS, the opportunity to put tax-forfeit pamels back on the tax rolls is viewed as positive by the City of Mound; and WHEREAS, the involved portion of the tax-forfeit lot includes privately owned docks by the applicants and is generally not accessible or used by the public in this area. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound as follows: 1. Hennepin County should begin the formal process to commence release of a portion of the tax-forfeit property described as PID No. 19-117-23-24-0047. This portion consists of the portion of Lot 29 that lies between the Easterly extended lot line of Lot 1, Block 1, Avalon, and the Westerly most extended lot line of the East 10' of Lot 4 as attached to Lot 3, Block 1, Avalon. 2. If the property is released, it should be offered for sale and combined with adjacent properties only 3. Any deficient special assessments on file which occurred prior to forfeiture and are unpaid shall be certified to Hennepin County prior to release of the property. 4. Any proceeds regarding the proposed sale of the subject parcel or portion thereof shall follow the policies contained in Resolution No. 84-94. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Osmek and seconded by Councilmember Brown. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Brown, Meisel and Osmek. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Meyer. Councilmember Hanus abstained from voting. -1711 - Resolution No. 02-45 Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2003. /s/Bonnie Ritter Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk /s/Pat Meisel Mayor Pat Meisel - -1712- JUN-0~-~00~ 15:03 P.01/02 Minnesota Senate Senate Bill Status Document Display Document l of I Bi~..~. Kevieo= Number: 04-3562 The House Sga%u$ shows the House action~ on ~F2334, if any have occurred. Compmnion File: SF2204 B__i~l Text House Status of SF2204 $_9~,ate, Sta=u~ of $F2204 Substltu~ion Display: $F2204 Bill Text Sho~ D~¢~p~on: Sm~ lands s~¢ an~ managcmcn~ p~$[ons mod~ca~om Long Descr:ip~o~ Chief Author: Saxhaug Author: Frederickson The log of ._U_n_offic_.i.~,l.. Act.,i._o,R_s. includes committee actions and initial committee hearings. Official Aotions: Date Action C~ ~tee/Descri~ion ~ll Call 05/11/2004 :ceived from House /11/2004 :r°ducti°n and firstI ~ g Les and J Lnistration -- SF2204 05/11/20041~to nnz][Con%m rpt: Rule 45- 05/12/2~lamend, sub G.en Ord 05/i2/2004115ec_0nd reading HPP: ~/15/2004 Special Order 05/15/2004 Laid on table 05/15/2004 Taken ~rom table 05/15/2004 Third reading Passed ~t60-0 htt~ :~www.r~vis~n~g~sta~e~mmus:8 ~ 8 ~ ~EARC~lBAS~S~ssta~ub~i~www/DDW?~=se~s... 6/2/2004 -1713- JUN-O~-~O~ Itas amended ....... IIHouse not concur, CC 05/~/zuU~llof 3 requested 05/15/20041tHouse conferees A..l[Senate accedes, CC of °s/ 5/2uu 113 be ppointed 05/15/200411Senate conferees ltH adopted MCC report 05/15/200411and repassed bill 05/15/200. Conference committee report# S adopted CC report 05/15/2004 and repassed bill G°verno~' i y of State Howes; Hackbarth; DillI ll'Frederickson; Bakk; /O4 Ch. 2 62 P. 02/02 S__~n_ate Bill Statu~ Se_______~.gh ~____~, -1714- Tax Forfeited Land Appraisal [ Fa # I Municapali .tv Proper.tv Address: Building ? No Type of Buildin£ ? CuJ"rentl. v Rented · , ~,~, . ..... , ,. Date Requested: 2/26/26 85 Mound ADDRESS UNASSIGNED Known Environmental Conditions ? No Property Type: LL Not Applicable Not Applicable -Vacant Land-Lakeshore ' Current Monthly Rent: $0 Prior Tax Forfeit At~prasdl Date: Prior Apprasal Amount $0 .:.TF.~.X00~i-,~i:.AlxlYi. QuESTiONS--pLEASE'CALL RORY LUCAS',612-348-7839':':i)':' . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PAR-T OF LOT 29 BLOCK 24 SETON LYING EASTERLY-OF THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE"WEST'LINE OF THE EASt'S0 OF LOT 4 BLOCI 1 AVALON Date Of Forfeiture: 9/27M 96'1 A Appraised Value, Appraisal Date ACCESS: Good ~ Poor GRADE: I~igh " ~'~ Low i, otSize:'(SquareFeet) ~ Rent Recommendation Requested ? Not Applicable RECEIVED MAR 1 6 2004 TAXPAYER SERVICES HENNEPIN COUNTY Recommended Rent Amount DateReceivedinTF£~(/¢ Computer Updated By Checked B (62) (~) RD ~ a IAItteI--HDL-~' KELLS RD I ~ , ' RD /..,,,.~. ~ I,! ....,_ /~7 . ' BRUNSWICK RICHM(DIVD - (103) RD H.F No. 2334, 5th Engrossment Page 33 of 42 57.11 57.12 57.13 57.14 57.15 57.16 57.17 57.18 57.19 57.20 57.21 57.22 57.23 57.24 57.25 57.26 57.27 57.28 57.29 57.30 57.31 57.32 57.33 57.34 57.35 57.36 58.1 58.2 58.3 58.4 58.5 58.6 58.7 58.8 58.9 58.10 58.11 58.12 58.13 58.14 58.15 58.16 58.17 58.18 58.19 58.20 58.21 58.22 58.23 58.24 58.25 58.26 58.27 58.28 58.29 58.30 58.31 58.32 58.33 58.34 58.35 58.36 59.1 59.2 general for consideration no less than the a~Dpraised value of the land and buildinqs~ The conveyance shall reserve an easement to the state alonq the waterfront for anglinq and manaqement purposes and an access easement across said lands to ensure inqress and eqress to the public for access to the Flute Reed River, which is a desiqnated trout stream. The exact location and leqal description of the easements shall be determined by the commissioner of natural resources. (c) The land to be sold is located in Cook County and described as: Part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 20, Township 62 North, Ranqe 4 EastL beqinning at the quarter post between Sections 17 and 20; thence runninq South 16 rods (264 fee~h; thence West 10 rods (165 Ieetl; thence North 16 rods (264 feetk/_thence East 10 rods (165 feet) to the place of beGinninq. That portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quartera Section 20, Township 62 North, Ranqe 4. East, described as follows: Startinq from a point on the east line of said forty-acre tract 264 feet South of the northeast corner thereof as the point of beqinninql thence West 165 feut alonq the south line of the tract of land heretofore deeded by the Qrantors herein to the town of Hovlan~ which deed is recorded in the office of the reqister of deeds of Cook County~ in Book R of Deeds on pagD 262 thereof; thence West five feet£. thence South 115 feet more or less to the north bank of Flute Reed River; thence southeasterly alo_~the north bank of said river 214 feet more or less to the east line of the above described forty-acre tract; thence North alonq said east line 237 feet more or less to the point of beqinninq. _(d) The parcel described in paraqraph (c) is removed from the Grand Portace State Forest. (e) The parcel described in paraqraph (c) is a former forestry office site and it has been determined that this site is no longer needed for natural resources purposes. Sec. 16. [PUBLIC SALE OF TAX-FORFEITED LAND BORDERING PUBLIC WATER; CROW WING COUNTY.] (a) Notwithstandin~ Minnesota Statutes, sections 92.45 and 282.018, subdivision ~_ Crow Wing_Qounty may sell the tax-forfeited land borderinq public water that is described in paragraph (c), under the remaininq provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 282. .(b) The conveyance must be in a form approved by the attorney ~eneral. (c) The land to be sold is located in Crow Winq_Coun~3 and is described as: undivided 1/3 interest in the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast ~q~rter, Section ~ Township 45 North, Ranqe 28 West. (d) The count~ has determined that the county's land management interests would best be served if the lands were returned to private ownership_~. Sec. 17. [CONVEYANCE OF TAX-FORFEITED LAND BORDERING ON PUBLIC WATER OR WETLANDS; HENNEPIN COUNTY.] (a) Notwithstandinq Minnesota Statutes, sections 92.45, 103F.535, and 282.018, subdivision 1, Hennepin County ma~ subdivide a lar~er tract of tax-forfeited land borderinq Avalon Channel, Black Lake, Lake Minnetonka, and described as Lot 18,. also Lots 29 to 32 inclusive~ Block 24, "Seton," situated in the city of Mound and may sell the portion of the parcel of tax-forfeited lands borderinq p9blic water or natural wetlands that is described in par_r~r~ph_(c) accordinq to ~thi% section. (b) The conveyance must be in a for__m_~p~roved by the attorney qeneral and must be subject_to restrictions imposed by the commissioner of natural resources~ includinq but not limited to the requirement that no new structures~_other than docks, shall be allowed on the portion of thq_~___arcel Hennepin__Count¥ .../getbill.pl?number=HF2334&s. ession=ls83 &~- 1 ? 17 - ~test&sessi°n-number=0&sessi°n--year 6/2/2004 H.F No. 2334, 5th Engrossment 59.3 may sell, and further requirement that the balance of the 59.4 tax-forfeited parcel not sold shall remain in city park status. 59.5 The land described in paragraph (ckmust be sold under the 59.6 alternate sale provisions in Minnesota Statutes, section 282.01, 59.7 subdivision 7a. 59.8 (c) T~e parcel of land that may be sold is described as: 59.9 that parc of Lot 29, Block 24~_~eton,"~l~i_n_q easter3y of the 59.10 northerly extension of the west line of the East 10 feet of Lot 59.11 4, Block 1, Avalon. 59.12 _(d) The county has determined that the county's land 59.13 management interests would best be served if the lands were 59.14 returned to private ownership. 59.15 [EFFECTIVE DATE.] This section is effective the da~ 59.16 following final enactment and upon delivery by the city of Mound 59.17 to the Hennepin County auditor a deed reconveying portions of 59.18 tax-forfeited land to the state of Minnesota for that portion 59.19 59.20 59.21 59.22 59.23 59.24 59.25 59.26 59.27 59.28 59.29 59.30 59.31 59.32 59.33 59.34 59.35 59.36 60.1 60.2 60.3 60.4 60.5 described in paragraph (c) that may be sold by Hennepin County. Sec. 18. [PRIVATE SALE OF TAX-FORFEITED LAND BORDERING 12.28 PUBLIC WATER; HENNEPIN COUNTY.] (a) Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, sections 92.45 and 282.018, subdivision iL and the public sale provisions of Hinnesota Statutes, chapter 282L Hqnnepin Count~ may sell the tax-forfeited land described in _R~r~g_~aphl_C)_L_to the persons making payment for the land to the citz of Independence, without restrictions or limitations, under the remaininq provisions of Hinnesota Statutes,_ chapter 28~ _(b) The conveyance must be in a form ~p2oroved by the attorney general for the appraised value of the land. Notwithstandin% Hinnesota Statutes, sections 282.08 and 282.09, the proceeds from the sale authorized under ~aragraph_l~) shall be apportioned as follows: (1) 20 percent of the gross proceeds of the sale shall be retained by Hennepin County for deposit in the county forfeited tax sale fund; and (2) 80_percent of the.gross proceeds from the sale must be paid to the commissioner of natural resources. Honey received ~y the commissioner, under this section~ shall be deposited in the water recreation account in the natural resources fund and is appropriated to the commissioner for grants to political 60 6 60 7 60 8 60 9 60 10 60 11 60 12 60 13 60 14 60.15 60.16 60.17 60.18 60.19 60.20 60.21 60.22 60.23 60 24 60 25 60 26 60 27 60 28 60 29 60 30 subdivisions for public access or other natural resource improvements to Lake Sarah in Henn%pin County. (c) The land to be sold is located in Hennepin County and is described as: Lot 17,__Block ~a Beamish Shores Second - Addition. (d) The county has determined that the county's land management interests would best be served if the lands were returned to private ownership. (e) The city of Independence may_ rep~ all or a portion of the prier payment made to the citz of Independence for the land. Sec. 19. [PRIVATE SALE OF TAX-FORFEITED LAND; ITASCA COUNTY.] (a) Notwithstanding the public sale previsions of Hinnesota Statutes, chapter 282, or other law to the contrary, Itasca County may sell by private sale the tax-forfeited land described in paragraph (c) to an ad~qini~q landowner to resolve an encroachment. (b) The conveyance must be in a fo.rm~9proved b_y_ the attorney general for consideration no less than the appraised value of the land. (c) The land to be sold is located in Itasca County and is described as: the North 150 feet of the East 175 feet of Government Lot 8, Section 21~ Township 55 North, Range 26 West. (d) The county has determined that the county's land ~anaqement interests would best be served if the parcel was Page 34 of 42 · ../getbill.pl?number=HF2334&session=Is83 &x_ 1 ~"l 8 htest&session_number=0&session_year6/2/2004 Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department A-600 Hennepin County Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0060 February 26, 2004 Attention: Sarah Smith, Director City of Mound Community Development Department 5341 Maywood Road Mound MN 55364-1687 RE: Special Legislation for sale of portion of Lake Minnetonka waterfront tax-forfeit land PID 19-117-23 24 0047 Dear Director Smith: I have enclosed your copy of a Minnesota DNR letter dated 2/24/04 sent to the State Senate and State House Environment & Natural Resource Committee chairs regarding the DNR commissioner's recommendations on SF 2184 and HF 2206. I have also enclosed a copy of a Directive from the Examiner of Titles for Hennepin County, which clears up the tax title on the registered land held by the City of Mound under a public use deed for park purposes. A new certificate of title will be registered in favor of the City of Mound, subject to conditions in the Directive. As you know, if/when the special legislation becomes law, the City of Mound will have to prepare and execute a Deed Reconveying Portions of Tax-Forfeited Land by Governmental Subdivision to the State of Minnesota for that portion to be sold at an adjacent owner auction. Please call me at 612.348.7870 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~pervisor Tax-Forfeit and Property Revenue Se.c!!on EnclosureS · .:. An Equol Opportunity Employer - - 1719- PT Form 976 (Revised 04/03) Minnesota Department of Revenue Reconveyance of Portions of Forfeited Lands to the State of Minnesota By a Governmental Subdivision Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, Subdivision ld State Deed Tax Due Hereon: $1.65 WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, Subdivisions la to lc, the State of Minnesota, on the day of conveyed to a governmental subdivision of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter "Governmental Subdivision"), by state deed numbered certain real property of which the real property described below (hereinafter "Property") are a portion, to be used for an authorized public use, and WHEREAS, the Governmental Subdivision has either failed to put the Property to the public use for which it was conveyed, or has abandoned the public use for which it was conveyed, and now desires to reconvey the Property under Minnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, Subdivision Id to the State of Minnesota, to be held in trust according to Minnesota Statutes, Section 281.25, NOW THEREFORE, the Governmental Subdivision, pursuant to said laws, and pursuant to the duly adopted resolution of its governing body number dated does hereby grant and convey the Property in the County of described as follows, together with all appurtenances thereunto belonging: to the State of Minnesota, to be held in trust as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 281.25, upon like conditions and with like effect as if the Property had not been conveyed to the Governmental Subdivision for a public use. (Name of Governmental Subdivision) By: Signature Title Date STATE OF MINNESOTA ) County of ) On this the By: day of and the Signature Title Date and respectively of the governmental subdivision named in the foregoing instrument, appeared before me and aclmowledged that they executed the same as the free act and deed of said governmental subdivision pursuant to the statutes in such case made and provided. Notary Date - 1720-. This Instrument Was Drafted By: Name Address Tax statements, if any, for the real property described in this instrument should be sent to the County Auditor of the County wherein the Property is located, in care of the County Courthouse. Approval The undersigned, acting for the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, under delegation of authority duly filed with the Secrctau of State, does hereby approve the foregoing conveyance to the State of Minnesota. Dated: STATE OF MINNESOTA Commissioner of Revenue By: The duly appointed delegate of the Commissioner of Revenue for these purposes. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) This Approval was acknowledged before me on appointed delegate of the commissioner of revenue for these purposes. by ., the duly Notary Date -1721 - 5341 Mayw00d Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: Planning Commission and Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: June 2, 2004 Re: Draft Dock Lot Provisions - Subdivision Ordinance Background. In April, the City Council discussed the City's subdivision procedures and whether splitting off a portion of a lakeshore parcel could be tax-combined with an adjacent non-lakeshore parcel for the purpose of providing lake access was possible. In general, the Council appeared to express support for the concept and directed that the matter be referred to the Planning Commission for discussion. At its May 17, 2004 meeting, the Planning Commission discussed the proposal. In general, the Commission was not adverse to the concept but felt that the "new" dock lot should be subject to the minimum lot size lot so as to no create a non-conforming lot which is consistent with basic planning principals. As the Planning Commission and City Council directives on the matter appear to differ, Staff included the item on the May 25th agenda for additional discussion. Members of the Council discussed the Planning Commission's position but requested that Staff move ahead with the preparation of a draft ordinance for concurrent review and discussion by the Planning Commission and City Council on June 7th and 8th respectively. A preliminary draft ordinance has been prepared for review and discussion and includes comments from the City Attorney. - 1722- ~-SmithJ Dean suagestions to V-I DISCUSSION DRAFT CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -200__ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 330 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE (SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE) TO INCLUDE PROVISIONS TO ALLOW THE CREATION OF DOCK LOTSPARCELS FOR PURPOSE OF PROVIDING LAKE ACCESS FOR AI;}JACE-4~T-N_EABB~ PROPERTIES The City of Mound does ordain: Subsection 330:05 (Definitions) of the Mound City Code is hereby amended and renumbered to add the following definitions: Dock LotParcel. A parcel or y .................... ~ .................. i~ ~,~NiwiN~N ~r +N~ n, ~r~ ~ ~mNinin~ ~ ~:;+h ~Aio~n+ r~iN~n+;~l m~r~l ,~ ~.~ ...... ~ ....... ~,~ ~ ..... , ....... ~ ...... ~ ..7~ ................ ~ .... land located on the shore of a lake which is combined with a nearby but non-contiauous residential parcel. Dock LctParcel Subdivision. Subd!v!c!cnThe process fcr the purpcse of: creating c dock !or. the Dock Parcel.. if necessary, by division of a laraer parcel; and [ii) combining the Dock Parcel with a non-contiauous residential parcel. Residential Parcel. The non-contiauous nearby residential parcel with which the Dock Parcel is combined. Subsection 330:10 (Procedural Requirements) is hereby amended to add a new Subsection D as follows: Dock LctParcels Subdivision...-..-.,.,..,..,, ~''~''~;'';'';''" ;"",--, thc. purpcco .., ''; ""'~+;""..,...~.,,,u ,,~,,~;,,,,, ....... .~,.,~ ~,, = o+~.,~+ ,,~ r .... ~, D,,-,~ ch~, Dock Parcel Subdivision will be processed as a Subdivision Exemption ~ ~~nde~ ~0.10 C o~ ~his Code~ sub~ec~ ~o ~he ~ollowing~ provisions: The a~-u '"~ ~l. ~,,, .... "*" b ...... ,~".,,'a'~'l'~,~. ~_ooroval of a Dock Parcel Subdivision will include an approved site plan showina the nature and location of all structures and im0rovements that may be constructed on the Dock Parcel. No structure or improvement JBD-248623v2 MU220-5 - 1723- other than those shown on the approved site plan may be constructed on the Dock Parcel unless the site plan is amended. 2. The dock letparcel shall be located within feet of the adjae, e~ '~'°;'~'"*;'" ..... ~ ..... ~';"~' ;° *" ~' .... ~';~'~Residential Parcel ,,; ..... ,~;~,, +,-, ~, ...... ;,~,,~ ,.,,, ,~,.. r,;,,, ,.; ~A.., .n,~ Dock Parcel must · -,, ,,.~vv,~,,,:::~ ~v ~.,,., I~,vv,..~.,~ ~.,~ ~,,~.~ v,~.,v v~ ,v,v~.a,,~. be separated from the Residential Parcel by a public street The approval of the Dock Parcel Subdivision will not be given until the City. is assured that the Dock Parcel cannot be separated from the Residential Parcel and sold separately without the consent of the City. The form and documentation to ensure satisfaction of this provision: which may include a development aareement, shall be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. ThC ~r~r~li~r~ o1~11 ~n+~r ;n~ ~l~mm~n~ ~r~m~n~ t~,;~ ~. , ~,,v~,,~ ~,,~,, ~,,~, ,,,~v ~ ~~,,,~,~ ~,~,,,~,,~ ~,, ~,,~ ~;+~, ~; ~A~,.. ,nH t~,~i~h ohnll. ~ -~.~ --~ .,,. ,-;~s ,~- i..~. The apnroval of the Dock Lot Subdivision will be automaticallg cancelled and rescinded if the applicant has not furnished thc City_ with evidence that the Dock Parcel and the Residential Parcel have been tax combined within 45 days following aooroval of the Dock Lot Subdivision, The Dock Parcel will not be subject to any of the restriction,~ apolicable to Lots under the City. Zonino Code; but must be of sufficient width to qualify for a Lake Minnetonka Conservation District dock license. 7. R ThC ~1,-,,.-I/ I,-~* ~-,,I-,..I;,,;o;~.,~TN.. Dock Parcel Subdivision shall not create any new nonconforming conditions. 6~-. Square footage of the dcck !ctDock Parcel shall not be included in hardcover., lot area or lot coverag~ calculations for the Residential Parcel. 9. 7. Dock !ct c'JbdMcionParcel Subdivision shall not trigger loss of non- lot of record status for the Residential Parcel. 10.8~-. Accessory structures with the exception of those allowed in City Code Chapter 350:__ (Shoreland Regulations) shall not be allowed on the dock lot. JBD-248623v2 MU220-5 - 1724- 'l'l.Q~. Placement of any dock shall be subject to the provisions of the Lake ' Minnetonka Conservation District. Passed by the City Council this day of Published in The Laker the day of Effective on ,200_. 200_. ,200 . Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel JBD-248623v2 MU220-5 - 1725- CHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax http://www.kennedy-graven.com MEMORANDUM 6/3/04 To Sarah Smith From: John Dean Subject: Ways to Assure Non-Separation of Combined Parcels. The City Council is considering a process by which residential parcels can be combined with non- contiguous lake shore parcels (Dock Parcels) so as to give the residential parcel lake access and a dock. The process would involve the creation of the dock parcel which would likely be deficient in some of the dimension and area requirements that are ordinarily applicable to lots under the Code. A chief concern of the Council is that these dock parcels not be allowed to be separated from the residential parcel to which they are combined and sold as separate lots. The Council wished to know what mechanisms are available to protect against such happening. Several mechanisms are available: Tax Combination. Once the dock parcel is combined with the residential parcel for tax purposes, it can only be separated, for tax purposes, by authority of the City. With the exception of a partial foreclosure, the tax combination provides a good protection against a later separation of the parcels not authorized by the City. Lender Consent. In instances in which the residential parcel is already subject to a mortgage (this will probably be the usual case), the applicant for the dock lot could be required to obtain the approval of the lender to include the dock parcel in the mortgage. Although this might require some effort by the applicant, I don't see any reason why the lender would object. o JBD-248645vl MU220-5 Declarations and Memorials. A declaration and memorial could be executed by the owners and recorded against both the residential parcel and the dock parcel which would provide that the two must always be sold and encumbered as a unit, and prohibiting the owner of the residential parcel from ever attempting to sell or encumber the dock parcel separately. The instrument could also provide that in the event that the residential parcel was separately sold in foreclosure, or in the event that the residential lot was otherwise separately sold, ownership to the dock parcel will pass to the City to be held in trust until - 1726- some future owner of the residential parcel wants to recombine it, and pay all the City's carrying costs and loss of tax revenue. The current draft of the proposed ordinance on this subject does not go into detail about what assurances will be required to prevent separation. I think that approach is the proper one; and the City can structure the mechanism to meet each individual application. JBD-248645vl MU220-5 - 1727- . II , Page 1 of 4 Kandis Hanson From: Sent: Attach: Subject: "Cline, Patrick V" <patrick.v.cline@xcelenergy.com> Wednesday, May 26, 2004 10:25 AM image002.jpg Xcel Energy Connections Patrick (Pat) Cline Manager, Community and Government Relations South and West Metro Area Minnesota Jurisdiction Xcel Energy 952-829-4504 (Office) 612-539-6932 (Pager) 612-573-9381 (Fax) email: patrick.v.cline@xcelenergy.com In this issue: Call Us When Your Power Goes Out E.nergy..~ar th.e..Fu.~ure Trimming Trees: Reliability and Responsibility M E! R.ecog n.~e s..Xce .Eh e~gy..for.. M.E R.P .!~ [oj e(;t "Green Pricing" He ps Spur Renewab e Energy Deve opment Thanks for ~av ng_Er)ergy lEnergy- May 2004 Call Us When Your Power Goes Out Information is key when severe weather or some other factor knocks out the power, and these tips can help you be prepared to stay informed yourself and answer questions from affected residents. · Your community relations manager is the direct contact for local government staff during severe storms or other significant events. We'll keep you up to date on power restoration at critical facilities such as water pumping stations and waste treatment plants. · Report outages. We encourage our customers to call us at the first sign of an outage. These calls help us pinpoint the equipment involved and assign crews accordingly. If your community receives both gas and electric service from Xcel Energy, and a situation arises where both gas and electric crews are needed, please be sure to call both gas AND electric emergency numbers: Emergency/Electric Outage (800) 895-1999 Gas Emergency/Gas Odor (800) 895-2999 · Encourage residents to listen to local news reports. When an outage is widespread, we work with local news media to keep the public informed about changing conditions and restoration times. - 1 728- 5/26/2004 Page 2 of 4 We're linking to a couple of fact sheets you might find useful in answering residents' questions about what to expect in outages, the equipment in our system and our priorities for restoring power. The Outage Restoration Information sheet is written for the general public, and the ~t..~g~ .~.o~.~.~.~.i.~.~io_!~..s._...?..!;ogra.~..f. or..~.~!.~.i.~.e~ contains more detail for our business customers. You can count on us to do our best. If an outage is widespread, due to severe weather or some other factor, our field crews work around the clock, safely and as quickly as possible, to restore power to all our customers. B.gg~_..[o_.~.o_p Energy for the Future Your power is our priority, today and tomorrow. That's why planning is an ongoing process at Xcel Energy. Here's a look at what we're doing to ensure a reliable power supply for our customers. The process is complex, with many variables, but we stay focused on: · Meeting our customers' long-term needs. Our 2002 Resource Plan projects an average energy growth rate of 1.68 percent per year over the next 15 years. Each biannual plan addresses our customers' needs over that period. · Efficient use of our resources. Projects such as the Blue Lake conversion, below, enable us to add new capacity to our system and make environmental gains as well. Using a variety of fuels, including natural gas, nuclear, coal and renewables helps us maintain steady supply and hedge against market price volatility in any one fuel source. Minnesota's long-term power needs will be met by initiatives such as these: Shakopee. We are seeking authorization to add two combustion turbines at our Blue Lake peaking plant in Shakopee to meet our near-term needs for extra capacity when our system reaches a peak - in summer 2003 our peak demand was 8,289 megawatts, on Aug. 20. Each of the two new turbines would be fired by clean-burning natural gas and would have a summer capacity of approximately 160 megawatts. Currently, the Blue Lake plant has four units fired by oil and a total capacity of 225 megawatts. Service is expected to begin in 2005. The Southwest Minnesota Transmission project includes new transmission lines that will increase the amount of wind power that can be generated on Buffalo Ridge. Mankato. We have contracted with Calpine Corp. for a 20-year purchased-power agreement for a 365- megawatt combined-cycle natural gas plant to be built in Mankato. Calpine will build, own and run the plant. The contract, part of our ~0_0.~....~o...s_p.u_..!:_.c__e calls for Calpine to produce 280 megawatts of intermediate power and another 85 megawatts of peaking capability. Service is expected to begin in 2006. Buffalo Ridge. Currently there are about 450 wind turbines along the Buffalo Ridge, representing over 300 megawatts of generation capacity. Through the ~o.~t~o~...M!.n.~.~ot~. ~r~.~!.~.~.~.$i.~n~ P. roj~t, we are investing $160 million in new transmission facilities to carry wind power off Buffalo Ridge and pave the way for further wind development. Trimming Trees: Reliability and Responsibility Trimming trees to reduce contact between limbs and power lines is a critical component of Xcel Energy's electric service reliability. (We send the attached b.r~ch~!_!;e to affected customers to let them know more about why and how we trim, and what kinds of trees are safe to plant near power lines.) Recently we were recognized by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for "high standards and community involvement" in tree-trimming practices. - 1729- 5/26/2004 Page 3 of 4 The recognition comes as a result of our ninth consecutive year as a T._ree.!Jn.e..USA award recipient, an honor bestowed by the National Arbor Day Foundation for outstanding tree-care efforts. Xcel Energy is the only Minnesota-based utility to receive the Tree Line USA award. MEI Recognizes Xcel Energy for MERP Project The Minnesota Environmental Initiative (IVlEI) has presented its Partnership of the Year Award to Xcel Energy, noting the environmental benefits of the Metro Emissions Reduction Project (M_~?) and the broad range of support HERP has received in the Twin Cities and surrounding communities. MERP, which comprises upgrades at three of our Twin Cities-area coal plants, represents the largest voluntary emissions- reduction effort in the nation. MEI is a member-supported nonprofit organization, founded in 1991, that brings together representatives from environmental organizations, businesses, community groups and government agencies to find innovative ways to achieve environmental improvements. Back to _top - 1730- 5/26/2004 Page 4 of 4 "Green Pricing" Helps Spur Renewable Energy Development In its annual ranking of leading utility "green pricing" programs, in which consumers can choose to help support additional electricity production from renewable resources such as solar and wind, the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) ranked Xcel Energy and our _W_i_n_d_s_.o_ur_c__e.® program first in the nation in the total number of customer participants and fifth in green pricing program sales, based on combined statistics from the program's Minnesota, Colorado and New Mexico customers. More than 500 utilities in 33 states now offer these programs. "Customer choice is proving to be a powerful stimulus for growth in renewable energy development," says Lori Bird, NREL senior energy analyst. Your local government can support wind energy in Minnesota by signing up for Windsource. Back _to to_p Thanks for Saving Energy! In 2003 Xcel Energy's energy conservation programs helped our customers save 245 gigawatt hours of electricity - enough to supply 33,000 homes - and 709 million cubic feet of natural gas - enough to supply 8,900 homes. Conservation programs benefit our ro~i~r!~ii~!, ~u.~.i~o.s~ and oo.~.~orq!.~!/!!?d~_~r!.a.I customers; Xcel Energy; and the environment. Customers who use electricity and natural gas efficiently can lower their monthly energy bills. We use conservation as part of our power supply strategy, and using less energy is good for the environment. Our conservation programs are among the most successful in the United States. Bac___k to top_ About this newsletter: We distribute Energy Connections periodically to local governments in Xcel Energy's Minnesota service territory to keep you informed about issues that affect your area. Please read it and pass it on to your interested colleagues, and reply to this e-mail to send us your comments or questions. If you'd prefer to be removed from our list, e- mail Beverl~,~a_k_ken~..xcelenergy.com or call (612) 330-6017. ~2004 Xcel Energy Xcel Energy is a trademark of Xcel Energy Inc. ,Xcel Energy-Community Relations; 414 Nicollet Mall - GO5; Minneapolis, MN 55401 Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy - 1731 - 5/26/2004 Date Weather Harbor Wine & Spirits May 200~ Cust 04 Cust 03 Variance 5/1/2004 sunny/cool 455 315 140 ~;/2/2004 615 -615 5/3/2004 sunny/cool 199 666 -467 5/4/2004 sunny/nice 248 248 5/5/2004 ¢ldy/rain 236 260 -24 5/6/2004 sunny 243 260 -17 5/7/2004 sunny 417 303 114 5/8/2004 sunny 591 340 251 5/9/2004 484 -484 5/10/2004 sunny 231 610 -379 5/11/2004 sunny/warm 207 207 5/12/2004 cldy/rain 232 284 -52 5/13/2004 cldy/rain 225 232 -7 5/14/2004 COOL/SUN 446 287 159 5/15/2004 sunny/cool 427 303 124 5/16/2004 624 -624 5/17/2004 sunny/warm 215 739 -524 5/18/2004 sunny/warm 258 258 5/19/2004 sunny/warm 225 230 -5 5/20/2004 sunny/warm 232 271 -39 5/21/2004 rainy 439 327 112 5/22/2004 cool/rain 465 343 122 5/23/2004 659 -659 5/24/2004 cool/rain 216 736 -520 5/25/2004 cloudy 210 210 5/26/2004 sunny 254 254 5/27/2004 sunny 308 296 12 5/28/2004 SUNNY/NICE 542 346 196 5/29/2004 rainy 530 329 201 5/30/2004 522 -522 5/31/2004 Holiday 753 -753 Totals 8051 11134 -3083 Sales 04 9353.55 3360.75 3562.47 3624.35 4126.39 9152.53 12744.29 3206.67 2793.09 4019.58 4059.65 7908.92 8538.5 3284.67 3694.76 3885.86 4027.92 7737.8 9360.13 3214.45 3858.2 4237.54 6593.63 10877.63 12814.63 150037.96 Sales 03 5066.39 11774 13191.51 3476.69 3482.76 4580.23 5320.75 9164.32 12460.07 4132.48 3463.08 4692.62 4981.44 11062.15 14833.37 3062.83 3573.34 5362.58 6237.15 14289.1 18999.74 4637.65 5000.39 4963.87 9687.95 15961.62 203458.08 Difference +/- 4287.16 -11774 -9830.76 3562.47 147.66 643.63 4572.3 7423.54 -9164.32 -9253.4 2793.09 -112.9 596.57 3216.3 3557.06 -11062.15 -11548.7 3694.76 823.03 454.58 2375.22 3122.98 -14289.1 -15785.29 3858.2 4237.54 1955.98 5877,24 7850.76 -9687.95 -15961.62 -53420.12 - - 1732- oD. '~D ,. ,,(D IDJ ~ O~ The GiHespie Gazette VOL XII NO 6 Jm~e- 2004 May20,2OOg p~. ~ rea~a~ for t?te me~t~ ~ to ~ ~ ~s t~ a~l l~i~g y~u ~ to ~ ~ o~r ~ ~ oper~y~. In a r~nt ~w~~ we g~we a ~f ~t~ of t~e Ce~t~, ~ we always ~t ~ ~ ~w we opiate f~. Mccoy ~ ~e very ~pri~e~l to ~ Ho~ d~ we d~ CC?. W~h ~e~~ ~, ~em~>r~l d~>~z~, C~m~ty s~~ ~ of ~~, f~ ~~~. ~t ~ a ~ t~ to j~e ~ of t~e~e ~ to cov~ ot~ co~ts. you ~ave ~ly a~cl fr~ls w~o wo~l l~e to ~ a ~. S~e yow ~t the "St~te of t~e C~' ~_~~ ~ f ~ ~. ! G ~ ~e C ~ter Board of D Cr ~cto~ s - 1735- Medi Theresa Sunde Community Relations Coordinator May 25, 2004 Dear Community Leader: Mediacom is pleased to introduce new Mediacom Digital Star packages that will give customers improved value and flexibility in choosing digital cable services. The new digital packages are attached for your review. These new digital packages are available to current and new customers as a promotional offer beginning May 21, 2004. The existing digital packages will continue to be sold through June 30, 2004. However, all current digital customers may keep their current level of digital service unless they request a new digital package. Mediacom remains committed to providing our customers with the finest cable service available. Please contact me directly at (507) 835-2356 if you have any questions or concerns about the new packages. Sincerely, Theresa Sunde Mediacom Communications Corporation 1504 2Da Street SE · Waseca, MN 56093 · 507-835-2356 · Fax 507-835-4567 - - 1736- tsa540002 5/14/04 2:02 PM Page Dear Valued Customer, We are pleased to introduce the new Mediacom Digital Stax Paks. These new packages were created to give our customers greater value and flexibility inchoosing digital cable services. The Digital Star Paks listed below are now available. Current digital packages will no longer be sold after June 30, 2004. Customers who currently subscribe to a digital package are welcome to contact us to switch to one of the new Star Paks or may choose to remain in their current package. Digital customers will soon receive more information about the new Star Paks including options to convert from their existing level of service. Thank you for being a valued customer. New Digital Pricing Digital Equipment Digital Converter with Remote (Standard) Digital Converter with Remote (HDTV/DVR) Digital Gateway (includes Interactive Guide, Pay-Per-View Access, Music Choice) Digital Programming (Digital Converter Required) (Rates do not include the cost of Family Cable) Digital Plus (Family Cable and Digital Gateway required) Channels formerly known as Digital Special Interest and Digital Variety Pac $5.00 $7.5O $3.00 $8.00 A la carte Premium Servicer (Digital Converter and Digital Gateway not included) HBO STARZ! Showtime Cinemax Cinemax (when added to Two Star or Three Star Paks) (Includes Standaxd Digital Converter and Digital Gateway) Mediacom One Star (Includes STAP, Z!) Mediacom Two Star Showtime (Includes STARZ! and Showtime) Mediacom Two Star HBO (Includes STARZ! and HBO) Mediacom Three Star (Includes STAP, Z!, HBO & Showtime) Mediacom Four Star (Includes Mediacom Three Star plus Cinemax & Digital Plus) $13.95 $8.00 $9.95 $9.95 $8.00 $9.95 $17.95 $21.95 $29.95 $42.95 Advanced Products* $4.95 DVR Service HDTV Tier (Includes HD Net, HD Net Movies, ESPN HD, Bravo HD & Discovery HD) $9.95 ~Digital Video Recorder (DVR) service and HDTV service (where available) require an HDTV/DVR capable digital converter. Premium HDTV feeds (where available) require an HD capable digital converter and are included in the subscription to each respective premium service. ± -1737- - 1 sa540002 Moody's Investors Service 123 North Wacker Drive, Suite 1350 Chicago, IL 60606 May 20, 2004 Ms. Kandis Hanson City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364-1687 Dear Ms. Hanson: We wish to inform you that on May 20, 2004, Moody's Rating Committee reviewed and assigned a rating of Aa3 to Mound (City of) MN's General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2004A; General Obligation Revenue Bonds, Series 2004B; General Obligation Equipment Certificates, Series 2004C. In order for us to maintain the currency of our ratings, we request that you provide ongoing disclosure, including annual financial and statistical information. Moody's will monitor this rating and reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to revise or withdraw this rating at any time in the future. The rating, as well as any revisions or withdrawals thereof, will be publicly disseminated by Moody's through normal print and electronic media and in response to verbal requests to Moody's ratings desk. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me or the analyst assigned to this transaction, Henrietta Chang, at 312-706-9969. Sincerely, Edward Damutz Vice President Mr. James Prosser Ehlers & Associates, Inc. .-- 1738- Investors Serv e Municipal Credit Research New Issue Published 20 May 2004 Mound (City of) MN Contacts Henrietta Chang Jonathan North 31 2-706-9969 31 2-706-9973 Moody's Rating ISSUO General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2004A Sale Amount $1,785,000 Expected Sale Date 05/25/04 Rating Description General Obligation General Obligation Revenue Bonds, Series 2004B Sale Amount $1,675,000 Expected Sale Date 05/25/04 Rating Description General Obligation General Obligation Equipment Certificates, Series 2004C Sale Amount $500,000 Expected Sale Date 05/25/04 Rating Description General Obligation Rating Aa3 Aa3 Aa3 MOODY'S UPGRADES RATING TO Aa3 FROM A1 AFFECTING THE CITY OF MOUND'S (MN) $13.145 MILLION OF OUTSTANDING G.O. DEBT, INCLUDING CURRENT ISSUE; UPGRADES RATING TO A1 FROM A3 ON THE CITY'S SERIES 2002 LEASE REVENUE BONDS Aa3 RATING ASSIGNMENT TO THE CITY OF MOUND'S (MN) G.O. IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2004A; G.O. REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2004B; AND G.O. EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004C Opinion Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Aa3 rating to the City of Mound's (MN) $1,785,000 G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2004A; $1,675,000 G.O. Revenue Bonds, Series 2004B; and 8500,000 G.O. Equipment Certificates, Series 2004C. Concurrently, Moody's has upgraded the rating to Aa3 from A1 on the city's outstanding parity debt, affecting $13.145 million, including the current issues. Moody's has also upgraded the rating to A1 from A3 on the city's Series 2002 Public Safety Building Lease Revenue Bonds, affecting 86.775 million of outstanding debt. The current issues are secured by the - 1739- unlimited tax pledge of the city, although debt service support is expected from special assessments levied against benefiting properties and water and sewer revenues. Proceeds will finance various street and utility improvements, and equipment purchases. The upgrade on the city's Lease Revenue Bonds reflects the essential purpose of the project to the district and the appropriation risk of annual payments from the city, which are supported by annual charges to member cities which are under contractual agreement to share in public safety expenditures. Although member cities have the right to non-renew their respective contracts, costs are redistributed among remaining members, which was done recently when one city decided not to renew its three year contract. The rating and upgrades also reflect the city's mature tax base undergoing significant redevelopment as a suburb in the Twin Cities metropolitan area; satisfactory financial operations evidenced by growing and healthy reserves; and moderate debt burden. MATURE MINNEAPOLIS SUBURB EXPERIENCING REDEVELOPMENT Moody's expects the city's economy to remain stable and its tax base to continue experiencing redevelopment related growth due to its favorable location in the Twin Cities metro area. The tax base, currently $928 million and covering just over 4 square miles, has averaged a strong 14.7% annual growth over the past five years, evidencing both appreciation of real estate in the region, as well as new or redevelopment construction projects. Just 20 miles west of Minneapolis (G.O. rated Aa1), the city is primarily a fully mature bedroom community that has been focusing redevelopment on its old downtown areas, improving access to high value lake front property along Lake Minnetonka. Recently completed projects include the relocation of a Tru-Value hardware store, a post office, the construction of a new public safety building and a new municipal liquor store. New residential development continues, with multi-family units planned as part of a broader plan to provide higher-density residential options. The city's existing housing stock is older and is being reconstructed with newer, higher valued housing. The city's wealth levels are above average, with per capita income 131% above state levels and 140% above those of the US as a whole. Economic health of the region is further evidenced by ample employment opportunities in Hennepin County, whose unemployment rates (4.1% in March 2004) have historically trended below state and national averages. HEALTHY FINANCIAL OPERATIONS, SUPPORTED BY STRONG FUND BALANCES, EXPECTED TO CONTINUE Moody's expects the city's financial operations to remain healthy due to historically sound financial management with conservative budgeting practices and growing fund balances. The city ended fiscal 2002 with a General Fund balance of $1.9 million, equivalent to a substantial 51.9% of General Fund revenues. Although a $440,000 deficit was budgeted for fiscal 2003, the preliminary unaudited results show a $288,000 surplus, reflecting favorable variances in revenues and expenditures at $500,000 and $200,000, respectively, evidencing a conservative budgeting process. As of fiscal 2004, the city will no longer receive local government aid, compared to $300,000 the previous fiscal year. The city expects this loss will be largely offset by new revenues, in particular a new utility franchise fee started in 2003, which contributed a large part of the fiscal 2003 positive revenue variance. Although the loss in aid provides short term pressures (which the city expects to be able to offset), it provides more stability to the city's revenue stream in the long run as it will no longer be vulnerable to additional state reductions. Property taxes comprise the largest portion of the city's revenues, at 61.6%, while public safety and government administration are the largest expenditures (38.7% and 22.3% respectively). MODERATE DEBT BURDEN EXPECTED TO CONTINUE AND REMAIN MANAGEABLE Moody's expects the city's 2.1% debt burden to remain manageable due to continued tax base growth and non-levy support for debt service. As part of the city's overall comprehensive capital plan, the city expects to issue approximately $1.5 to $2 million - 1740- -- annually over the next several years to update all of its infrastructure and roads. The city also expects to issue G.O. revenue debt to construct a new water tower and expects that debt service will be paid out of water revenues. Additionally, the city is exploring a consolidation of its parks and public works facilities, which may require some new construction. Taking into account these expected capital needs; Moody's believes the city's overall debt burden to remain at manageable levels. KEY STATISTICS 2000 population: 9,435 2003 full valuation: $928 million Full valuation per capita: $98,31 5 Median family income (as % of state): 120.3% Per capita income (as % of state): 1 30.7% Hennepin County unemployment (March 2004): 4.1% Fiscal 2002 General Fund balance: $1.9 million (or 51.9% of General Fund revenues) Debt burden: 2.8% Payout of principal (10 years): 42.7% Post-sale parity debt outstanding: $13.145 million, including current issue - 1741 -_- ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE.~ IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT, All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, such information is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind and MOODY'S, in particutar~ makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, tirneliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose of any such information. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information, The credit ratings and financial reporting analysis observations, if any, constituting [)art of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements o-r opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, Each rating or other opinion must be weighed solely as one factor in any investment decision made by or on behalf of any user of the information contained herein, and each such user must accordingly make its own study and evaluation of each security and of each issuer and guarantor of, and each provider of credit support for, each security that it may consider purchasing, holding or selling. MOODY'S hereby discloses that rnost issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MOODY'S have, prior to assignment of any rating= agreed to pay to MOODY'S for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to $1~00,000. Printed in USA - 1742- Hennepin County Administration Sandra L. Vargas, County Administrator A-2303 Government Center 300 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55487-0233 612-348-7574 FAX: 612-348-8228 TDD: 612-348-7367 www. co.hennepin.mn.us May 18, 2004 Ms. Kandis Hanson City Manager City of Mound 5241 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Ms. Hanson: I am pleased to announce that the Hennepin County Board has acted upon my recommendation and has appointed Jim Grube as the Hennepin County Engineer. I will continue to be the Assistant County Administrator, Public Works. Our roles will remain substantially the same except that Jim will assume all formal responsibilities of the Hennepin County Engineer on Wednesday, May 19, 2004. Both of our office locations will remain the same. Please join me in congratulating Jim on his appointment. Sincerely, Assistant County Administrator, Public Works An Equal Opportunity Employer - 1743- _- Recycled Paper MoUnd Fire Depactment Time Capsule Inventory Photos a.. Public b. C. d. e. f. g, h. i. j. k. I. m. n. o. Safety Facility Project Team Public Safety Facility Demolition Photos (12) Mound P.S. Ground Breakin'g Ceremony Photo (1) Public Safety Facility Design Concept Photos (4) Mound Fire Station Temporary Location Photo (1) Mound P.S. Facility Grand Opening Photos (5) Mound P.S. Facility Photos - Outside (2) · Mayor, Fire Chief, City Manager Photo (1) Mound Firefighters 2004 Photo (1) MFD Fire Company Photos (5) MFD Current Apparatus and History Photos (21) MFD Department Photos - January 2004 (1) City Council Photo of 2004 Department Heads Photo of 2004 Police Department Photo of 2004 2. Publications and Print a. Time Capsule Letter From Fire Chief Greg Pederson b. City of Mound Facility Study (S E H) c. Public Safety Facility Brochures and Newsletters d. Laker Newspapers - January 10,17, and May 29, 2004 e. Lakeshore Weekly News - January 20, and June 1, 2004 f. City Contact Publication - Spring 2004 g. Mound P.S. Facility Grand Opening Program (VHS Tape) h. Letter from Paul Meisel to All Westonka Area Residents "of the Future" i. Letter from City Manager, Kandis Hanson j. Letter from Police Department of 2004 k. Mound Police Department Annual Report 2002-2003 o Mound a. b. C. d. e. f. Public Safety Facility Miscellaneous Financial Overview Mound P.S. Facility Project Budget - June 3, 2004 Microsoft Power Point Slide Show - P.S. Facility Copy of Certification of Occupancy- M.P.S. Facility Masons Commemorative Coins (3) Masons Commemorative Pins (2) Mound a. b. ¢. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. I. Fire and Police Department Information History and Background Pertaining to MFD MFD 2004 Organizational Information MFD Uniform Patch MFD 75th Anniversary T-Shirt MPD Uniform Patches (3) MFD Firefighter Dress Uniform Badge MPD Dress Uniform Badge 2004 Fish Fry Announcement and Ticket 2004 Fish Fry Drink Mug Fire Chief Greg Pederson Business Card Small Toy Truck with MFD Logo Wooden Carving of a Fire Truck and Police Truck (made by Bill Gillespie) DVD Media - Numerous FD Photos - 1744-