2010-11-30 specPLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable
cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community.
0 AGENDA
Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Cover Memo
II. Support of Local Organizations 2-54
III. General Fund Forecast and Budget 55-58
IV. Long Term Forecast and Capital Improvement Plan 59-74
U
C7
MEMO
Date: November 23, 2010
To: Mayor and Council
From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Catherine Pausche, Finance Director
Re: November 30 Budget Workshop
Contained is information that will guide us through some of the outstanding issues related
to the 2011 Budget and Long Term Financial Plan. The last long -term financial plan was
updated in 2007 and obviously much has changed since then. We plan to develop a
format that is updated at least annually and reflects the changes in our priorities and the
10) changes in the environment.
We have spent the last three years focusing on reducing our operating expenditures and
responding to a declining tax base and levy limits. Recognizing that growth will be much
slower than in the past, there will be continued pressure to reduce spending for years to
come. Further reductions may require a radical shift in the way we provide services, and
we will need to spend more time researching what other cities are doing, benchmarking
our performance, and finding ways to collaborate. The Council will need to determine
which programs and services are priorities as staff seeks innovative ways to respond to
cost pressures like rising fuel and healthcare costs.
For the November 30 workshop, the following topics will be discussed:
• Financial Support and Services of Local Organizations (Gillespie, LMCC)
• General Fund Forecast and Budget, Opportunities and Risks
• Long Term Financial Plan — Governmental and Enterprise Funds
• Debt Refundings - 2011
The workshop format is to allow for an in -depth exchange between the Council and Staff.
If necessary, another workshop will be held on December 7 with the final 2011 budget
and levy approval on December 10. Please contact Catherine Pausche if you have any
questions regarding the enclosed information in advance of the meeting.
-1-
•
Date: November 23, 2010
To: Mayor and Council
MEMO
From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Catherine Pausche, Finance Director
Re: Support of Local Organizations
The Gillespie Center and Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission are two local
organizations that have received financial support from the City of Mound over the years. The
Gillespie Center has also received in -kind services since 2002 as described in the Cooperative
Agreement with the Gillespie Center.
Both organizations have sought increases in the financial contributions. In 2010, the Gillespie
Center financial support was increased to $60,000. The 2011 proposed budget reflects a 5%
increase for the LMCC, although they are hoping for much more in the coming years.
Staff would like to discuss the issues and implications of the increases in contributions with the
City Council in the November 30' workshop.
Gillespie Center
The packet contains 1) the in -kind services agreement with the Westonka Senior Citizens
Foundation approved in 2002, and 2) the more recent agreement for provision of community
services and recreational facilities with the Gillespie Center approved in 2010. Since 2009, the
City has reduced the public works full -time staff by 3 FTEs, or 17 %, and reduced part-time
seasonal staff significantly as well. Capacities of the remaining staff having been met or
exceeded at this point so leadership staff is suggesting that we need to look closely at all of our
commitments to see if any of the workload can be reduced or eliminated. Possible options will
be introduced at the workshop.
Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission
Mound residents make up 20% of the LMCC/Mediacom subscribers. We have an agreement
with the LMCC from 2000 that agrees to pay the LMCC the Public, Educational and
Governmental (PEG) Access Fee of $.84 /per subscriber, in addition to another $.67 /per
subscriber of the 5% cable franchise fees collected from Mediacom. Mound also contributed
equipment to the LMCC at the inception of the agreement and, in return for these things, the
-2-
LMCC provides programming and services to residents and tapes and broadcasts our council and
HRA meetings.
The LMCC has requested that Mound become a "full- member" city which would involve giving
control of the cable franchise agreement with Mediacom to the LMCC. In 2009, Mound
collected $130,494 from Mediacom and paid the LMCC $45,150. In a good faith effort, the
2011 proposed budget reflects ramping up that contribution by 5 %. Full membership would
result in a net reduction of approximately $85,000 in the General Fund revenues, which is not
affordable for Mound at this time.
Fiber to the Home
In addition, members of the LMCC board started the "tonkaconnect" initiative whose objective is
to "bring community owned and operated, world -class access to television/video, Internet and
telephone services to every residence, business, library, school, city, public safety organization in
the members' and affiliate cities' areas."
Per the http: / /www.tonkaconnect.com/ website: "Our fiber -optic based network will rival the
best and fastest in the world. It will be available to all and at affordable prices. Our technology
and service delivery will make us leaders in the industry and our local presence will provide a
hometown service experience."
Contained in the packet is a request from Dick Woodruff, a LMCC Commissioner, requesting
• that Mound pay approximately $2,000 to share in the costs of a survey to see if this service
would be desired by area residents. If the survey results are positive, a business plan would be
created and if it is determined the business plan is financially viable, revenue bonds would be
issued by this non - profit and the business would be launched. Additional monetary support from
the member cities would be necessary to fund the business plan development, but the revenue
bonds would not be backed by the cities.
Leadership Staff contend that Mound residents currently have video, phone and internet
available from Mediacom and Frontier Communications, and that satellite providers also provide
services in the area. Frontier is in the process of developing a response that basically mirrors our
thoughts on this matter. It is also Staff's opinion that the organization is unproven and that, at
best, will acquire only a percentage share of the market, making its sustainability in a
competitive market not nearly so optimistic.
Enclosed are communications from Mediacom regarding their services and their opinion of the
tonkaconnect initiative.
Recommendation: Mound, due to its population, is a large percentage of the total subscriptions
of the LMCC group of cities. It is important that the Council establish its position fairly soon on
these two LMCC initiatives and communicate that position to them so they know how they will
• ? be financially impacted on both fronts.
-3-
C7
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 22nd day of Janu rv, 2002 by and between, the City of
Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, ('Mound ") and the Westonka Senior Citizens
Foundation, a Minnesota non -profit corporation ( "Westonka ")
BACKGROUND
The Gillespie Senior Center is owned and operated by Westonka, and is operated on
a not - for -profit basis as a clubhouse, meeting and recreational- facility serving senior citizens in
communities generally located in the western Lake Minnetonka area. The work of the Center is
recognized by communities in the area, and a number of them have made financial contributions to
assist the Center in its operations.
Mound recognizes the activities of Center to be a key and important part of public recreation
for the citizens of the community.
Mound has previously made a significant contribution by approving an exemption from
property taxation for the Center.
Due to continuing unmet financial needs, the Westonka has requested that Mound consider
additional assistance. Because of severe budget constraints, Mound was unable to provide for a
monetary contribution to the Center in its 2002 budget.
Mound is authorized by law to operate programs of public recreation, and to equip a
maintain land, buildings and other recreational facilities to carry out such programs.
Mound is further authorized by law to enter into agreements with non -profit organizations as
such parties may mutually agree to provide for such programs.
AGREEMENT
In light of the foregoing, the parties hereto do stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Consideration. The consideration if the mutual promises and undertakings
hereinafter made which the parties each deem to be adequate consideration.
2. Westonka Services to Continue. During the term of this Agreement, Westonka
agrees to continue to provide clubhouse, meeting and recreational facilities serving primarily senior
citizens in the western Lake Minnetonka area, including Mound.
3. Services Provided to Westonka. During the term of this Agreement, Mound will
provide the following services to the Center. •
Parking lot sweeping.
-4-
■ Mowing, limited to one (1) time per week; no bagging or sweeping.
■ Secure broken windows and other openings, not due to storm damage.
• ' Respond to water and sewer emergencies.
■ Snow plowing from parking areas and walkways, suited to removal by
motorized vehicles.
Snow hauling, when needed.
• Sanding of parking areas.
4. . Additional Westonka Consideration. In addition to the consideration contained in
paragraph 1 above, Westonka agrees during the term of this Agreement to do the following:
■ Provide a meeting room at the Center for use by Mound at no charge for one
six-hour period per month. (Mound to be responsible for the set -up and
take -down of the room before and after the meeting)
■ Sponsor a dinner for the Mound crews providing the services
■ Make coffee and restroom facilities available to Mound crows while working
at the Center.
■ Provide personnel to assist in Mound mass mailings and newsletters.
5. Scheduling and Requesting Services. As soon as possible after the execution of this
Agreement, designated representatives of the parties will meet and formulate a schedule for
performance of the services described in section 3 above, and process for requesting them. As
to services that cannot be scheduled, in advance, for specific times, such as snow removal and other
emergency services, the parties will formulate a response time schedule that will address, for
example, the type of weather .event that will trigger snow plowing, and the timing for providing the
•. service in the case of such a weather event. Until a schedule has been formulated for each service,
Mound may, but is not required, to provide such service.
6. Liability and Indemnity. Mound indemnifies, and agrees to defend and save
harmless, Westonka, its officers agents and employees from any claim or cause of action for injury
to persons or property occasioned by or arising out of the negligence or willful or wanton
misconduct of Mound, its officers agents of employees, in the performance of its obligations under
this agreement. Mounds liability to Westonka.under this Agreement is limited to this section and
section 7.
7. Consequential Damages. Mound sliall be liable to Westonka for any loss in rental
income, or from claims from individuals scheduled to use Center facilities ( "Third Party Claims "),
resulting from the failure of Mound to perform any service as provided for in the schedule for that
service, but only to the extent that Mound's failure is due to the negligence or willful or wanton
misconduct of Mound in performance according to the schedule. Failures to comply with the
schedule that are not due to such conduct by Mound, or which are due to circumstances beyond
Mound's control will not be the basis for claims under this section, and with respect to Third Party
Claims, Westonka hereby indemnifies and holds harmless Mound and its officers agents and
employees.
8. Term. Termination. The term of this Agreement shall be for one year from the date
of execution, and will automatically extend for successive one -year periods unless either party
•, ' notifies the other party in writing, within 30 days of the termination date that it elects not to extend
the Agreement.
-5-
9. Termination During Term. Either party may terminate this Agreement during its
initial term or any extension thereof. Such termination may be for cause, or for no cause. If the
termination is for failure of the other party to perform, the terminating party may, at its election,
make the termination effective upon the giving of written notice of such to the other party. If the
termination is by Mound, and is not due to a breach by Westonka, the termination shall not be
effective until Westonka has had a reasonable opportunity to obtain an alternate source for the
services, or until 6 days following written notice of termination, whichever comes first.
10. Addition or Removal of Services. The parties may, from time to time, agree to add
or remove services from the schedule of services described in Section 3 above. The Center will be
subject to incremental charges for services in any subsequent agreements.
11. Miscellaneous.
The provisions of this agreement are intended to be binding on and inure to
the benefit of parties hereto and their successors and assigns.
This agreement is not intended, and shall not be construed to confer any right
or cause of action on third parties not signatory hereto.
Written notices required under this agreement will be either hand delivered
or mailed by registered mail at the following addresses:
In the case of notices to Mound:
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Attn: Kandis M. Hanson
In the case of notices to Westonka:
Westonka Senior Citizens Foundation
Gillespie Center
2590 Commerce Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364
Attn: Foundation President
IN Wrr vESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year
first above written.
CITy-QF MOUND
B
Pat eisel, Mayor
WESTON SENIOR CITIZEN FOUNDATION
B
Its:
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
•.
0 1i
LJ
-6-
City of Mound
Expenses - Senior Center
• _ Cash & In -Kind Donations 2005 - 2007
City Budget:
Cash Contribution
In -Kind Donations:
Public Works:
604 04-
In- kls 5eYYtce_S
2005
$ 3,750
2006
$ 3,750
2007
$ 4,000
Snow Removal
Labor
$410
$430
$455
(8 Times per year)
Equipment
$665
$700
$735
Others
Labor
$90
$95
$100
(Parking Lot Sweeping
Equipment
$170
$180
$190
2 times per year)
Material
$50
$55
$60
Parks:
Mowing
Labor
$1,055
$1,110
$1,165
(Weekly May - Oct)
Equipment
$1,325
$1,390
$1,460
• ? Subtotal In Donations:
$3,765
$3,960
$4
-Kind
Total Cash & In -Kind:
17.Z10
$8.164
Note: Mound approved an exemption from property taxes for the Gillespie Center,
whereas the Mound Lodge paid $4,996 in property taxes in 2007.
r,
AGREEMENT FOR PROVISION OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES ,
This Agreement is made effective as of the 27th day of October, 2009 by and
between the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City ") and the
Gillespie Center, a Minnesota 7n- profit corporation ( "Gillespie ").
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to cooperate with or support a non - profit
corporation which operates recreational facilities and programs pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 471.16; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to appropriate money to support facilities,
programs and services of non - for - profit senior centers and youth centers pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 471.935; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to expend funds for a public purpose, an
activity that will benefit the community as a whole, is related to functions of government,
and does not have as its primary objective the benefit of a private interest; and
WHEREAS, Gillespie owns and operates a community center located at 2590
Commerce Boulevard, Mound, Minnesota for the use and benefit of senior citizens and
other residents of the greater Westonka community, including the City of Mound; and
WHEREAS, the City finds that Gillespie provides a public service which benefits
the community as a whole by offering facilities, programs and services that provide
recreational, educational and social opportunities for senior citizens and other residents •
of the City; and
WHEREAS, the City and Gillespie desire to formalize their agreement regarding
the use of the community center by and the provision of services for residents of the
City.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. PROVISION OF COMMUNITY SERVICES AND RECREATIONAL
FACILITIES Gillespie shall operate its community center building in Mound,
MN to provide facilities, programs and services for City residents on an on-
going basis. The programs and services to be provided by Gillespie shall
include, but not be limited to, nutritional meals, transportation, health and
wellness screenings and programs, social and recreational events and trips,
educational and enrichment opportunities, tax assistance, counseling and
case management, information and referral services, advocacy services,
assistance for independent living, friendship opportunities, and such services
as further described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part of this
Agreement.
2. TERM The term of this Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2010 and
end on December 31, 2011.
3. SUPPORT PAYMENT The City shall pay to Gillespie an annual support •
payment of $60,000.00 for the provision of community services, programs
-g-
and facilities as described in this Agreement. The support payment may be
• made in monthly or other regular installments in the discretion of the City.
4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Gillespie is an independent contractor
engaged by the City to provide the services described in this Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed, implied or deemed to create
any relationship other than one of independent contractor between the City
and Gillespie, including, without limitation, a relationship of employment,
agency, joint venture, association, partnership or any other form of legal
entity or association. Gillespie shall be responsible for the administration
and payment of all applicable federal, state, and local employment taxes and
withholdings with respect to any amounts paid by the City to Gillespie or any
of Gilllespie's employees.
5. INSURANCE Gillespie shall maintain the following insurance coverages
during the term of this Agreement:
a. Worker's Compensation Insurance in compliance with applicable law; and
b. Professional, automobile, general liability, and property insurance in
amounts and in forms satisfactory to the City and Gillespie shall include
the City as an additional insured on all such policies.
6. EARLY TERMINATION Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained
herein, either party may terminate this Agreement prior to the end of the term
as follows: (a) without cause - by the delivery to the other party of seven (7)
•'j days advance written notice of termination, and (b) for cause or material
breach of this Agreement by the other party — immediately, by delivery of
written notice. In the event that this Agreement is terminated early as
provided herein, the annual support payment due to Gillespie shall be pro-
rated on a per diem basis through the termination date, and if Gillespie has
received more than its pro -rated portion of the support payment, Gillespie
shall return such unearned portion of the payment to the City on the
termination date.
7. ANNUAL REPORT AND RECORDS ACCESS Upon request, but at least
annually, Gillespie shall provide the City with (a) a report of all activities,
services, programs, and events provided to City residents pursuant to this
Agreement, (b) a full financial accounting of Gillespie's income and expenses,
(c) a complete report of its fundraising activities and contributions to its
endowment fund, and (d) a copy of its Form 990; all certified as accurate, true
and complete by an authorized officer of Gillespie. In addition, Gillespie shall
provide the City and its staff access at all reasonable times to all of its books,
records, documents, papers, and records of every kind and nature (together
referred to as the "Records ") related to this Agreement, the provision of
services pursuant to this Agreement and Gillespie's operations, and shall
permit the City to inspect, examine, audit, copy and make transcripts of the
Records for a period of six years after termination of this Agreement.
8. NOTICES All notices required to be given by either party pursuant to this
Agreement shall be in writing and sent to the other party at the following
•'$ addresses:
2
-9-
To the City: City of Mound
Attention: City Manger
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55384
To Gillespie: Gillespie Center
Attn: President or Co- President
2590 Commerce Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
All notices shall be deemed received when delivered, if hand - delivered, or
three business days after deposit with the United States Postal Service,
postage prepaid. Notices by fax or email alone are not sufficient. The
addresses for notices may be changed by the parties from time to time by
delivery of written notice to the other party as provided herein.
9. NON - DISCRIMINATION In the performance of this Agreement, Gillespie
shall not discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment, user
of the community center or City resident because of age, race, color, creed,
religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, disability or
status with regard to public assistance. Gillespie shall post the provisions of
this non - discrimination clause in public places visible to persons using the
center and applying for employment and shall post a statement that all
qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment. Gillespie shall
incorporate these non - discrimination provisions into its contracts and
agreements with sub - contractors with respect to the provision of programs
and services to be provided pursuant to this Agreement.
10. INDEMNIFICATION Gillespie does hereby, for itself and its successors and
assigns, release and agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless
from all Loss or Damage in any manner, directly or indirectly arising out of,
resulting from, or in any manner connected with this Agreement, the provision
of facilities, programs and services pursuant to this Agreement, and
Gillespie's operation of the community center. The term "Loss or Damage" as
used herein means all losses, costs, expenses (including without limitation,
reasonable attorneys' fees, disbursements of counsel and costs of
investigation), liabilities, damages, debts, fees, fines, penalties, charges,
assessments, judgments, liens, settlements, claims, demands, rights, actions,
suits, causes of action, and proceedings, and other obligations of any nature
whatsoever and of any person whomsoever, including for death or injury to
any person (including the parties and their employees, agents, and
contractors) and including damage to property owned by, leased, rented to, or
in the care, custody, or control of the parties and including damage to the
environment or natural resources. The indemnity obligations contained in this
Section shall survive termination of this Agreement.
11. GILLESPIE FUNDRAISING AND ENDOWMENT CONTRIBUTION
Gillespie shall conduct fundraising activities and obtain annual contributions
to fund its operating expenses and endowment. Each year Gillespie shall •
make a minimum contribution to its endowment fund of an amount equal to
M
-io-
115% of the total of all the "City Contributions" made by all of the participating
•'f cities to Gillespie for that year; Gillespie's contribution to the endowment fund
shall not include any portion of the City Contributions. In the event that
Gillespie does not raise sufficient funds (from sources other than the City
Contributions) to make this minimum contribution to its endowment fund in
any year, the City may immediately terminate this Agreement without
advance notice to Gillespie and Gillespie shall return to the City on the
termination date any portion of the annual support payment which has not yet
been earned. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "City Contributions" is
defined as follows: the sum of (a) the amount contributed to Gillespie by
Spring Park in excess of $3,500 /year, (b) the amount contributed to Gillespie
by Mound in excess of $4,000 /year, (c) the amount contributed to Gillespie by
Orono in excess of $19,000 /year, and (d) the amount contributed to Gillespie
by Minnetrista in excess of $3,500 /year.
12. DATA PRACTICES ACT COMPLIANCE Data and information provided to
Gillespie under this Agreement or through provision of services for the City
shall be administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13,
and all data on individuals shall be maintained in accordance with all
applicable laws, rules, and regulations.
13. ASSIGNMENT This Agreement may not be assigned by either party without
the advance written consent of the other party.
14. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW In providing services pursuant to this
• Agreement, Gillespie shall comply with all applicable laws, statutes, rules,
regulations, codes, ordinances. Any violation of this provision shall
constitute a material breach of this Agreement by Gillespie and will entitle the
City to immediately terminate this Agreement without advance notice and to
receive a refund of any portion of the annual support payment which has not
yet been earned.
15. SECTION HEADINGS The titles of the several parts, articles and sections of
the Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be
disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions.
16. PARTIAL INVALIDITY If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause,
paragraph or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid or
unenforceable by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not
affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of this
Agreement.
17. NO WAIVER The action or inaction of either the City or Gillespie shall not
constitute a waiver or amendment of the provisions of this Agreement. To be
binding, waivers must be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by
written resolution or motion of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly
take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be or be deemed to be a
waiver or release of any right of the City or obligation of Gillespie.
18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: AMENDMENT This Agreement and any attached
exhibits constitute the entire agreement between the City and Gillespie and
4
_11_
supersede any and all other written or oral agreemen between ft
related to the subject matter :'X 51 1 � 1111 Fie This Agreement can be
mo i ie or amended only by written agreement signed by both the City and
Gillespie.
19. APPLICABLE LAW This Agreement will be governed and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Gillespie have executed this Agreement
effective as of the date first written above.
CITY OF MOUND
By Attest:
Mark Hanus, Mayor Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
GILLESPIE CENTER
By
Harold Pellett, Co- President
•
-12-
EXHIBIT A
GENERAL COMMUNITY SERVICES
* Bus transportation
* Noon lunches
* Income tax preparation
* Library with Computers
* HUD -HRA assistance
* Health Insurance counseling
* Defensive Driving classes
* Banking assistance
* Bargain Bakery
* "Hidden Treasures" Shop
* Battery recycling
* Coffeehouse
HEALTH / WELLNESS
* Avada Hearing care
* Flu Shot Clinic
* LifeLine Screening
* Foot care
•; * Blood pressure checks
* Vision Loss Support
* Parkinson's Disease Support
* Senior Outreach Social Worker
* Over 50 and Fit Exercise Class
* Snapdragons Exercise Class
* Line Dancing Class
RECREATION / HOBBIES / CLUBS
* Cribbage, 500, Bridge, Progressive Rummy
* Wii Games, Scrabble, Movies
* Grand Buddies and Adult Book Clubs
* Art Club
* Hiking Group
* Crafters Group
* Quilters
* Gardening
* Stamping
* Gillespie Singers
* Pretenders Story Theater Group
* Community Singing Group
f
-13-
•
EVENTS
* Annual Golf Tournament
* Holiday Boutique
* "Festival of Trees"
* Santa's Hidden Treasures
* Style shows
* Themed dinners
* Mother's Day Tea
* Partnered with the Westonka Historical or Westonka Horticultural Societies
* Wedding, Anniversary, Social or Business Room Rentals
* Al and Alma's Summer Boat Cruises
* Annual Plant Sale
* Annual Homecoming Tail Gate Party
* Volunteer Appreciation Breakfast
TRIPS
* Shopping
* Old Log Theater Plays
* Chanhassen Dinner Theater Matinees
* Gale Woods Farm
* MN Landscape Arboretum
* MN History Center
* MN Science Museum and Omni Theater
* Macy's Flower Show
* Mystic Lake and Turtle Lake Casinos
* Others as available week days
PROGRAMS
* TRIAD — Mound Police
* Estate planning
* Westonka Area Blood Drives
* LMCC Filming of Gillespie Center show of "Seniors on the Go" on Ch. 12
* Memorial Day Service with American Legion
* Int programs with area school students and seniors
40
0
-14-
• ' EXHIBIT B
Insurance Policy Limits for City of Mound Contractors
General Liability:
$1,000,000
Each Occurrence
$1,000,000
Personal Injury /Advertising Injury
$2,000,000
Products /Completed Operations Aggregate
$2,000,000
Annual Aggregate
$100,000
Damage to Rented Premises
$5,000
Medical Payments (optional)
Auto Liability:
$1,000,000 Combined Single Limit — Bodily Injury & Property Damage
$1,000,000 Hired & Non -Owned Auto Liability
Workers'
Compensation:
• $100,000
Each Accident
$500,000
Policy Limit
$100,000
Each Disease
Statutory Limits Apply
Umbrella/Excess Liability:
$1,000,000 Each Occurrence and Annual Aggregate
Requested Certificate Wording:
The City of Mound is named as an Additional Insured with respect to their interest in work
performed on their behalf by the Named Insured. The Gillespie Center waives their right to
subrogation in favor of the certificate holder.
-15-
` f � ��o
Zel
Interaction for all ages
2590 Commerce Boulevard
Mound, MN 5 5 3 64 is
Phone 952- 472 -6501
I WOICE
% Catherine Pausche, Finance Director
CITY OF MOUND
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
For services rendered during 2010 to citizens of the City of Mound
Payment can be made in one lump sum or in installments at the
discretion of the city.
Thank you,
Harold Pellett
Co- President
$60,000
II1 L MS'�IIM�ntS:
'!�3o,oao 6- 8- to d�+�
•
� 3a, DID cZ - m - i o b&4a*,.
�Ae d 4► , Sao Gon+vnbw'k.d
3.0 10 (e4UA4&JA-#d
G,� do nai�ons� .
0')
Date: January 20, 2010
To: Mayor and City Council Members
From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Subject: Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (LMCC) Membership
Sally Koenecke, Executive Director of the LMCC, met with the Mayor and me in October, 2009, to propose that the
City of Mound join the LMCC as a full member, just like the cities of Wayzata and Chanhassen.
Currently, Mound retains the non - exclusive franchise agreement with Mediacom, whereas the LMCC holds the
franchise agreements for their member cities and collects 100% of the franchise fees and PEG (Public, Educational
and Governmental) access fees. The City of Mound collects its own fees and only pays a portion to the LMCC for
services provided. In summary, fees are collected and distributed as follows for the City of Mound:
2009 Franchise Fee (5% of Mediacom's Gross Revenues):
2009 PEG Access Fees Collected ($.84 per subscriber):
Total Fees (Revenue) Credited to the General Fund
2009 Fees paid to LMCC for services ($1.51 x approx 2,500 subscribers):
2009 Net Amount Credited to the General Fund (Note: 4Q estimated)
$104,495
25,020
$129,515
( 44,977 )
$ 84,538
The amount paid to the LMCC for services has not changed since the original agreement was established in 2000.
A copy of the original agreement and a listing of services provided have been attached.
The Mayor and I explained that the environment is not right to further reduce revenue in the General Fund, but
that we would look at alternatives and incorporate them into our future planning.
Before I incur costs to request the City Attorney review the agreements and offer any recommendations or
considerations, we thought it prudent to put it before the full council to see if it is something you want to
entertain given the significant loss in revenues to the City. In addition, the City has to evaluate its ability to bring
in other providers, if desired, to create competition and control costs for our residents.
We have invited Sally Koenecke to attend the January 26 Council Meeting to give an overview of the services
and benefits the City of Mound currently receives from the LMCC. In addition, she will be stating her case as to
why she believes full membership in the LMCC is a better alternative structure for our contract with the LMCC.
From there, I will ask the Council to give Staff direction on what alternatives to research and to what extent.
-17-
LOCAL PROGRAMMUNG FACILITIES AGREEMENT
This Local Programming Facilities Agreement ( "Agreement ") is entered into this
day of 9PA2, between the City of Mound, Minnesota ( "City") and the •
Lake ?V1* on Communications Commission ( "LMCC ").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, both LMCC and City have, through separate documents, granted to
Mediacom Midwest Associates, L.P. ( "Mediacom ") fifteen (15) year non - exclusive cable
Television Franchises; and
WHEREAS, each franchise requires Mediacom to remit to both LMCC and The City
a five percent (5%) franchise fee on Mediacom's Gross Revenues; and
WHEREAS, each franchise further requires Mediacom to remit a separate public,
educational, and governmental ( "PEG ") access fee to LMCC and the City in support of PEG
programming; and
WHEREAS, each franchise requires Mediacom to only provide the PEG access fee
and dedicated channel capacity in support of PEG access programming, and Mediacom has
no further PEG access responsibilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Collects a $.84 PEG access fee, while LMCC collects a $.50
PEG access fee, per subscriber, per billing period, which is paid by Mediacom on a
quarterly basis; and
•
WHEREAS, LMCC operates a 5,000 square foot equipped PEG access studio facility
( "Studio "), which it pays for with its PEG access fee and with portions of its five percent
(5%) franchise fee; and
WHEREAS, the City desires the use of The Studio as well as the professional
assistance which LMCC PEG access staff can provide; and
WHEREAS, LMCC desires The City's PEG access fee and a portion of the City's
franchise fee to help offset the costs associated with the operation of the Studio.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set
forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
0"
-is-
WHEREAS, the City has available PEG access equipment, outlined in Exhibi
SECTION I
SCOPE OF SERVICES
A. LMCC Obligations, This Agreement obligates LMCC to perform the following
• functions:
1. Manage, operate, and maintain the Studio and audio /video production
equipment and facilities located at 4071 Sunset Drive, Spring Park, Minnesota, available for
use by the City and its residents;
2. Maintain and repair, at LMCC's expense the City Equipment excluding
replacement of equipment deemed to have served its useful life.
3. Provide outreach and promote activities and opportunities relating to PEG
access programming to City residents under the same terms, conditions, and standards
adopted for LMCC residents;
4. �'r yid a °fie �neftssar-y: personnel to videot W City ;Co MOW
= t the of this Agreement foir ca'bast .on �nne1�.20 4 ,
5. Arrange for play back and live cablecasting of video, audio, and text
programming to the City an d its residents under the same terms, conditions, and standards
adopted for LMCC residents;
b. Assist the public, religious organizations, public libraries, educational
institutions, and other groups and organizations of the City in the facilitation of PEG access
• programming efforts under the same terms, conditions, and standards adopted for LMCC
residents:
7. Provide all PEG access programming for the City and its residents on cable
Channel 21 or another public access channel; and
8. Respond to questions and requests of City residents that pertain to PEG access
programming and related facilities and equipment.
B. City Obligations This Agreement obligates the City to perform or provide the
following functions:
1. Provide LMCC with the appropriate 1t r ,
City's franchise fee, in accordance with Section H A herein, as well as th
in accordance with Section III °herein;
2. Cooperate with LMCC in the effective implementation and administration of
the requirements and responsibilities outlined within this Agreement; and
3. Maintain sole responsibility for responding to questions and requests from City
residents regarding matters which do not pertain to PEG access programming, related
facilities and equipment regarding regulatory or franchise enforcement proceedings.
N
-19-
A. PEG Access Fee to Be Paid to LMCC. The current franchisee in the City, •
Mediacom, collects a PEG access fee in the amount of Miw''-subscriber per billing period.
Mediacom provides the PEG access fee to the City on a quarterly basis, which the City has
agreed to use to pay the LMCC for PEG access programming. In addition to the PEG
Access Fee of $.84 /per subscriber in the City, the City will pay, from it's Franchise Fee, up
to an additional $:6'1ex # for a total of $1.51 /per subscriber in the
City to the LMCC to pay for PEG access programming. The City hereby agrees to furnish
LMCC with the PEG access fee and the portion of it's Franchise Fee it receives from
Mediacom within .Wz*�W o f m eipt frorn Mediacom, and LMCC hereby agrees to
use said fees exclusively for support of PEG access obli ations required hereunder. City's
first payment to LMCC shall be calcula -went
thro�t4',u�` =tom _ loci �+tu�':
B. Right to Renegotiate PEG Access Fee If, at any time, LMCC chooses to return a
portion of its franchise fee paid by Mediacom to LMCC to any LMCC municipality, or
reduce the $.50 per subscriber PEG access fee collected by LMCC, the City has, in its sole
discretion, the option to renegotiate the amount of the PEG access fee and the amount of the
portion of the franchise fee to be supplied to LMCC. The LMCC and the City will provide
funding according to a per - subscriber amount based upon the percentage of subscribers
represented by the LMCC and the City. This will be reviewed at 3 months and 6 months for
accuracy of budget projections. If an agreement cannot be reached, this Agreement shall
terminate upon thirty (30) days advance written notice.
•
A. General Grant Upon the effective date of this Agreement, the City shall provide
LMCC with use of the City Equipment. LMCC shall not, by use of the City Equipment,
have any further rights therein. In the event this Agreement is terminated or expires, LMCC
shall return to the City the City Equipment in its entirely and in the same condition as when
first supplied to LMCC, absent normal wear and tear and excluding equipment that was
deemed inoperable or had lived its useful life. If there is any theft of equipment,
unexplained loss of equipment or shortage disclosed upon taking inventory the LMCC will
immediately notify the City for insurance purposes. This may or may not be covered under
the City insurance policy, however the LMCC will not reimburse the City for these losses.
B. Use of City Equipment The City Equipment shall be used by LMCC exclusively
for the development, construction, operation, maintenance, and other functions relating to the
PEG cess operations set forth in this Agreement.. LMCC shall exercise reasonable care in
maintaining and repairing the City Equipment. Upon failure to do so, the City may hire a
contractor to perform the maintenance and repair and seek reimbursement from LMCC for
the expenses resulting therefrom. Any use of the City Equipment by LMCC that is not
specified in this Agreement shall require the prior written consent of the City,
•
3
-20-
C. !Condition of CityFquipment An inventory of all City equipment covered by this
agreement will be completed by representatives of both the LMCC and the City within 30
days of the commencement of this Agreement. This will constitute the City inventory of
equipment. LMCC acknowledges that it has examined the City Equipment and that said City
Equipment is now in good and satisfactory condition for LMCC''s purposes. LMCC
• acknowledges it will examine the City Equipment and that it will determine with the City if
City Equipment is in good and satisfactory condition at the time of taking inventory. LMCC
agrees to return the City Equipment to the City at the termination or expiration of this
Agreement in the same condition when initially examined and used, absent normal wear and
tear.
D. Inventory of City Equipment LMCC shall, at all times, maintain an inventory of
the City Equipment, which shall be available for the City's review upon the City providing
twenty (20) days notice to LMCC. This request not to exceed twice a year.
E.
of or in the possession of LMCC and it shall list Q VW, ss an
F and `a11 'lilies covering the City Equipment,
• a• � �. ►
A. Outreach and Promotion The cm desires to provide PEG access programming
that will meet the needs of its residents. LMCC recognizes that community awareness and
understanding is essential to accomplish this goal. As such, LMCC agrees that it shall
} provide outreach d promotion to City residents under the same terms, conditions, and
standards adopted for LMCC residents.
B. Programming LMCC shall work with educational institutions, public libraries, and
religious organizations. LMCC shall assist these groups in their programming efforts. This
includes the coordination of program sources through tape exch2mge and technical
consultation services, as available and practicable just as the LMCC does for its member
cities.
_41
A. Maintenance of Records and reports LMCC shall make available to the City, upon
request, any requested financial information regarding the PEG access Studio and facilities.
LMCC shall also maintain records and prepare an annual report stating the name of each
City resident who has used the local programming facilities and City Equipment, the name of
each program produced, and the duration of each program produced.. ( "Report").
B. Inspection of Records The City shall have the right to inspect LMCC's records
during regularly scheduled business hours or at such other times as mutually agreed to
between LMCC and the City.
d.
-21-
C. Annual Report LMCC shall submit the annual Report to the City on or before the
first of February, each year.
SECTION VI
W 1 D 11�l.l� fi
LMCC and the City shall each indemnify and forever hold harmless the other, their
respective affiliates, officers, directors, employees, agents, and partners from and against any
and all liabilities, claims, losses or damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable
attorneys' fees) arising out of any breach of any obligation, representation or warranty
hereunder made by any party to this Agreement which gives rise to any claim by any person
or entity; provided, that in any case in which indemnification is sought, the party seeking
indemnification ( "Indemnified Party"); shall 1) promptly notify the party from whom such
indemnification is sought ( "Indemnifying Party "); 2) afford the Indemnifying Party the
opportunity of defending such claim; and 3) the Indemnified Party shall fully cooperate in
connection with such defense, litigation, settlement, or disposition and shall have the right,
but not the obligation, to join in and be represented by its own counsel at its own cost and
expense.
•
LMCC shall indemnify and forever hold harmless the City, its respective officers, directors,
employees, agents, and partners from and against any and all liabilities, claims, losses or
damages, costs and expenses arising out of programming errors or omissions over which
LMCC has responsibility, including copyright infringement, misappropriation of literary
property, or of program format, defamation, invasion of privacy, due to or arising out of
programming cablecasted on a PEG access channel. This indemnity shall be subject to the
procedural requirements including notice and opportunity to defend as set forth above. •'
SECTION VII
0
This Agreement shall be effective as of the date hereof and shall expire. on December 3 1,
2000. However, this Agreement shall automatically be renewed for additional one (1) year
terms unless The objecting party supplies the other with ninety (90) days written notice of
termination. Such notice of termination may be submitted at any time, by either party,
following December 31, 2000,
SECTION VIII
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
A. Supersedes Prior Agreements LMCC and the City agree that this Agreement shall
supersede any and all rights and obligations of LMCC and the City under any prior
agreements.
5
_22_
B. Binding on Successors This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the
benefit of LMCC and the City and their respective successors and assigns.
C Force Maieure If, by reason of Force Majeure, LMCC or the City are unable in
whole or in part to carry out their obligations hereunder, neither party shall be deemed in
violation or default during the continuance of such inability.
R .. _7
1. If any law, ordinance or regulation shall require or permit any party to this
Agreement to perform any service or shall prohibit any party from performing any service
which may be in conflict with the terms of this Agreement, as scwn as possible following
knowledge thereof, said party shall give notice to the other party of the point of conflict
believed to exist between such law, ordinance or regulation.
2. If any section, sentence, paragraph, term or provision of this Agreement is
determined to be illegal, invalid, or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction or
by any state or federal regulatory agency having jurisdiction thereof, such determination shall
have no effect on the validity of any other section, sentence, paragraph, term or provision
hereof.
3. In The event such decision, law, rule or regulation is subsequently reversed,
repealed, rescinded, amended, or otherwise changed, so that the section, sentence,
paragraph, term or provision hereof which had been invalid or modified is no longer in
conflict with The decisions, law, rules and regulations, said section, sentence, paragraph,
term or provision shall thereupon return to full force and effect and shall thereafter be
binding on all parties, provided that the party relying on the section, sentence, paragraph,
• form or provision shall give the other party or parties thirty (30) days written notice of such
change before requiring compliance with said provision.
4. In the event state or federal law changes so as to :substantially affect the
authority of local governments over cable television franchising, this Agreement shall be
reopened for negotiation.
E. Captio The captions throughout @s Agreement are intended solely to facilitate
reading and merely reference the sections and provisions of this Agreement. Such captions
shall not affect the meaning- or interpretation of this Agreement.
F. Weruretation This Agreement has been arrived at by negotiation and shall not be
construed against any party.
G, Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with Minnesota
law.
H. Notic Unless other -wise provided for herein, all notices, reports or demands
required to be given in writing under this Agreement shall be deemed to be given when
delivered personally to the persons designated below, or when Three (3) business days have
elapsed after it is deposited in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, with registered or
certified mail postage prepaid thereon, or on the next addressed business day if sent by
b
-23-
express mail oi, overnight air courier address to the party to which notice is being given,as
follows:
if To LMCC:
Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission
4071 Sunset Drive •'
P.O. BOX, 385
Spring Park, MN. 553 -0385
ATTN: Ms. Sally Koenecke
with copy to:
Bemick and Lifson, P.A.
5500 Wayzata Boulevard
Golden Valley, MN 55416
Attn: Thomas Creighton, Esq.
if to the City:
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN. 55364 -1687
ATTN: Ms. Francene Clark-Lei. singer
with copy To:
Mass & Barnett
A Professional Association
South 7th Street
4800 Norwest Center
Minneapolis, MN 55402 -4129
Attn: Brian T. Grogan, Esq. •'
Such addresses and phone numbers may be changed by either party upon notice to the other
party given as provided in this Section.
1. EntireAffeement This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and
understanding between LMCC and the City. No oral modifi dons or additions hereto unless
specifically referenced herein shall be binding. No verbal or written statements of either
LMCC or the City shall be considered a modification of this Agreement except by written
documents signed by bo parties expressly stating that it is modifying this Agreement.
J. No Joint Ventur . Nothing in this Agreement shall create a joint venture or principal-
agent relationship between LMCC and the City. Neither LMCC nor the City is authorized to
act towards third parties or the public in any manner which would indicate such a
relationship with the other.
K. No Waiver The failure of either LMCC or the City to strictly enforce any provision
of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver or as excusing the other party from
future performance.
L. Assignments This Agreement shall not be assigned or performance of the duties
hereunder delegated without the express prior w tten consent of the parties to do so. Any
.i
7
-24-
consent of assignment shall not unreasonably withheld.
• I
0
This Agreement is hereby accepted and we agree to be bound by all of its Terms and
conditions.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
LAKE MINNETONKA
COMMUNICATIO�NSS COMMISSION
By� .�.il b..
Its: A dl___ 0L 4 1
Dated:
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
By: .r
Its:l
Dated:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2000, by Sally Koenecke the
the a Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission on behalf of the Commission.
I E TTE XAE tCHER ROBERTS
RY' PUB.UD - MINNESOTA C*W. EXP. 1 -31 006
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
�' vj�-& C---'
.',
Notary Public
The foregoing instrument was acknowledg before me this .1. day
of r l , 2000, by Fran Clark the Acting City Manager of the City of Mound,
Minn sota.
COLLETTE KAERCHER ROBERTS 1
NOTARY pUflL1C - MINNESOTA
MY COMM. EXP. 1-31-2005
No tary Public
0
-25-
LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION •
4071 SUNSET DRIVE ■ BOX 385 ■ SPRING PARK, MN 55384 -0385 ■ 952.471.7125 w FAX 952.471.9151 ■ Imcc @Imcc - tv.org
DEEPHAVEN
EXCELSIOR
GREENWOOD
INDEPENDENCE
LONG LAKE
LORETTO
MAPLE PLAIN
MEDINA
MINNETONKA
BEACH
MINNETRISTA
ORONO
ST. BONIFACILIS
SHOREWOOD
SPRING PARK
TONKA BAY
VICTORIA
WOODLAND
May 14, 2010
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Kandis,
All the LMCC member cities look forward to the possibility of having Mound join us as
a full member. Over the years Mound and the LMCC have enjoyed a close relationship.
We especially appreciate the professional working relationship your staff has exhibited
when working with us on the many common issues that concern our communities. Your
citizens have definitely enhanced our operations through their many contributions
especially in the many shows they have produced, from sports, public opinion to
community awareness.
To aid you in your .budgeting process we propose a 3 year road map to full membership,
a very simple formula:
2011— 50% of all Mediacom fees the city receives
2012 — 75% of all Mediacom fees the city receives
2013 and beyond! 00%
Regards,
—1 � & �i
Tom Scanlon
Chair
0
-26-
Lake Minnetonka
Homes Passed and Subscriber
2009
� J
Am
MWp
Medlacom
SYSTEM NAME
HOMES
PASSED
OWN
1/14/2009
Basle
2/9/2009
Bask
4/14/2009
Bask
5114121)09
owl;
6/22/2009
Bask
8/5/2009
Bask
919/2009
Bask
ENOWN.Ma
Dee haven
1234
832
829
829
828
824
820
819
Excelsior
2170
875
888
885
880
889
881
878
Greenwood
223
169
169
164
163
168
165
163
Independence
553
178
179
183
183
186
182
185
Long Lake
1058
419
420
424
420
422
417
417
Loretto
339
157
155
149
147
148
143
140
Maple Plain
936
397
402
403
403
402
396
398
Medina
1405
667
671
669
669
666
670
664
Minnetonka Beach
237
135
135
134
134
135
134
134
Minnetrista
1079
671
671
677
676
673
669
670
O ound
5048
2513
2505
2494
12477
2500
2475
2458
Orono
2544
1452
1445
1434
1444
1457
1454
1441
Shorewood
2804
1668
1669
1663
'1654
1661
1648
1651
Spring Park
1163
376
375
379
386
387
378
374
St. Bonifacius
1057
548
559
556
563
564
562
564
Tonka Say
658
381
376
376
379
378
380
380
Victoria
2688
1299
1303
1302
1309
1298
1292
1284
Woodland
169
108
101
101
97
97
98
96
TOTALS
25,3651
12,8451
12,8521
12,822
12,812
12,8551
12,764
12,716
tms
Status Summary
_27_
•
AN INVITATION TO MOUND
TO BECOME MEMBERS OF THE LMCC
JANUARY 26, 2010
Benefits/Advantages to City Membership
Television Production Resources: Facilities, Staff, Workshops
- Studio use
- Mound programming on cable and via the internet
- Mound non - profit organizations can use the studio
- Taping of city council meetings
- Mound city programming
Promotion and Recognition
- LMCC website promotes Mound and the area.
- Tonka Report, Lakeside News highlight Mound.
- LMCC provides promotional materials.
- Recognition of award winning programs
Franchise Oversight
- The LMCC handles subscriber complaints
- The LMCC monitors the franchise agreement for compliance
- The LMCC pays for franchise fee audits of the cable company
- The LMCC studies and researches new developments in
communications (municipal fiber).
- The LMCC will implement the franchise renewal process.
- The LMCC files comments with the FCC and state legislature
to ensure the preservation of local control of franchising.
Current Considerations
• Costs of the LMCC have increased (van, streaming, personnel)
• The LMCC raised their PEG fee from .50 to .85 in 2008.
. The fees Mound pays have not been increased since the contract in
2000.
. Mound's original capital contribution has depreciated.
0,
-28-
LAKE MINNETONKA COMMU C OMMIS SION
• 4071 SUNSET DRIVE • BOX 385 ■ SPRING PARK, MN 55384 -0385. 952.471.7125 • FAX 952.471.9151 • Imcc ®Imcc - tv.org
October 9, 2009
Administrator Kandis Hanson
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Rd.
DEEPHAVEN Mound, MN 55364
EXCELSIOR
Dear Kandis,
GREENWOOD
Thank you to Mound Mayor Mark Hanus, Financial Director Catherine Pausche and
you for meeting with LMCC commissioners Jim Olds and Roger Hackbarth and me on
October 8 regarding the Mound Local Programming Facilities Agreement. We
INDEPENDENCE
appreciate your time in reviewing the Agreement and the roll that the LMCC takes in
facilitating programming for the City of Mound.
LONG LAKE
It has been some time since the Agreement has been reviewed and as we discussed there
LORETTO
have been many improvements and upgrades to our services since the Agreement was
initiated in April of 2000. Some of these include the addition of a van, the hiring of a
MAPLE PLAIN
full time production manager, another full time program producer, the addition of
streaming city council meetings and the purchase and upgrade of equipment. Our studio
MEDINA
operations budget has increased considerably since 2000.
The LMCC has appreciated Mound's participation and support of the production of
MINN BEACH
Mound's overnment meetings and other city related programming. g g ty p gramming. The funding
Mound contributes, that was initially negotiated, has not been changed. As we
MINNETRISTA
discussed the franchise fees have increased year to year and the LMCC raised their PEG
fee by 70% (from .50 to .85) a couple years ago. LMCC member fees have risen
ORONO
incrementally each year. With the review of the Agreement we are extending an
invitation to Mound to become members of the LMCC.
ST. BONIFACIUS If the Mound City Council would like to learn more about the LMCC we would be
happy to provide a tour of the facility, show examples of Mound programming or attend
SHOREWOOD a Mound Council meeting to answer any questions they may have. We know that you
and Mayor Hanus have been frequent visitors to the LMCC studio. Thank you, again,
SPRING PARK for your time and discussion. We appreciate your interest and participation in the
Mound community programming.
TONKA BAY
Sincerely,
VICTORIA 2b enecke WOODLAND Sally
Executive Director, Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission
r
952- 471 -7125
-29-
•
OVERVIEW OF MEMBERSHIP
IN THE LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Benefits/Advantages to City Membership
Television Production Resources: Facilities, Staff, Workshops
- The LMCC operates a television production studio for use by member cities,
non -profits and residents of those cities. It is located in Spring Park.
Professional production staff are employed to assist cities in the production of
governmental programming. Examples of this programming are city festivals,
National Night Out events, city concerts series and others. Election coverage last
year included candidates forums and candidates statements aired on our channels
and streamed over the internet.
Production staff also assist non -profits and residents in programming.
- Mound residents may take production and editing workshops free of charge (to
the individual) to produce local programming. This has included non -profit
organizations that can get their services promoted locally.
The LMCC hires and trains contracted employees to videotape city council
meetings. This is not an extra charge to cities. These meetings are aired on cable as
well as streamed on- demand on the LMCC website. Member cities' websites can be
linked to the LMCC website for access to the streaming function.
- The LMCC has a production van that is used to produce programs that merit a two
or three camera production on location.
- The LMCC currently operates four channels, Channel 12 for community
programming, Channels 8 and 20 are for government programming and Channel
21 airs school district programming. When programming isn't airing on the
channels they are programmed with community announcements and program
promotions. (Please see our brochures.)
Programming, Promotion and Recognition
The LMCC staff produces some regular series programming to promote the area:
Lakeside News program with segments on various activities of member cities.
Tonka Report which features a panel of city administrators from member cities.
Capital Update which features the state legislators from our area
The LMCC maintains a website to promote community programming as well as
to provide education about the commission to city residents.
The LMCC promotes its services with brochures and advertising materials. •
-30-
- The LMCC is a member of MACTA (Minnesota Association of Community
Telecommunications Administrators) and NATOA (National Association of
• ` Telecommunications Officers and Advisors). These organizations provide
information and education on telecommunications issues and regulations.
- The LMCC has garnered national and state awards for programs produced by
and for LMCC member cities.
Franchise Oversight
- The LMCC handles subscriber complaints from cities and residents and submits to
Mediacom for resolution. Mediacom must respond to our written complaints.
- The LMCC monitors the franchise agreement for compliance.
- The LMCC studies and researches new developments in telecommunications
(possible municipal fiber to the premise cable/broadband network currently under
study).
- The LMCC communicates and files comments with federal and state legislators and
the FCC with regard to telecommunications legislation.
Funding of the LMCC
- The franchise fees and PEG fees of the member cities are allocated to the LMCC
for operating and capital expenditures. The budget is approved each year by the
member cities.
Mound Considerations
- Any questions that Mound would have for the LMCC concerning
any further services would be considered by the LMCC for implementation.
-31-
CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE RENEWAL
Introduction 0'
A cable refranchising or franchise renewal process involves numerous tasks and the
coordinated efforts of a team of persons expert in the field of cable, City staff, elected
officials, and local residents. The process involves an examination of the past performance
of the current cable service provider, an exploration of future community telecommunication
needs and interests, and a negotiation process. The outline which follows is intended to
serve as a broad overview of what is typically involved in the franchise renewal process.
1. Preparing for the Franchise Renewal Process
• Develop an Understanding of the Authority of the City and Basic Federal and State
Laws that Apply
• Understand the Formal and Informal Renewal Process
• Develop a Renewal Plan and Timeline
• Educate Key City Staff, Elected Officials, and Community Leaders
• Understand the Current Regulatory Environment
11. Conducting a Review of the Cable Operator's Past Performance
• Contract Compliance Audit
• Update the Enabling Ordinance
• Technical Evaluation of the Cable Plant, Headend, and Quality of Past Plant
Maintenance
• Customer Service and Satisfaction Survey 0 1,
• Financial Review
• PEG Access Review
• Public Hearings
III. Ascertainment: Identifying Future Community Cable Related Needs and Interests
• Conduct Focus Group Workshops
• Conduct Telephone or Mail Survey
• PEG (Public, Educational, And Government) Access Usage and Community
Communications Planning
• Public Hearing(s)
IV. Preparing for and Conducting Negotiations
• Consolidate Information Gathered Into Goals for Renewal
• Determine Next Step in Renewal Process — Exploration of Process Options
• Prepare the Initial Draft of the New Franchise Agreement
• Conduct Formal and Informal Negotiations
— Consider Various Strategies
— Review the Impact of 1996 Cable Act on Negotiations
• Prepare the RFRP and Evaluate the Proposal(s) (under formal Cable Act process)
• Final Franchise Agreement Preparation and Public Hearings 01
-32-
LMCC
Mound Usage Report
Period: 12 -1 -08 to 12 -1 -09
Prepared by: Chris Vogt, Productions Manager and Jim Lundberg, Operations
Manager
Program Promotion
The LMCC promotes a variety of Mound's programming on Channels (8, 12, 20, and 21), the
LMCC website, and through local newspapers:
1. Producer Recognition: We recognized several Mound residents at our 14"' Annual
Producer & Volunteer Awards on September 24, 2009 including: Mark Hanus and his
son Tyler, Dee and Ken Scott, Daphne Okey and her son Nolan, Greg Sletten, John
Etherington, Eric Putkonen, Sindi Dossett, Eric Sweeter and Brad Curtis
2. Program Highlights on Community Channel 21: Mound related program promos,
upcoming city events, concert schedules, and council meeting airdates are highlighted
on our community message board.
3. Web streaming: Program promotion of Mound residents, local nonprofit organizations,
and special government related programming (city events, parades, new stories,
council meetings) are shown on the LMCC website: www.imcc- tv.orq
4. Newspaper Articles: Our LMCC channel schedules are featured weekly in "The
Laker" and "Pioneer" newspapers. We also submit articles about individual Mound
related programs to area newspapers.
• Ch. 8 Programs Produced for Mound Or e anizations
*City Council Meetings: See Attached Chart (Includes Web Streaming)
Ch. 12 Programs of Direct Interest to Mound Residents:
December 2008:
Lakeside News
LMCC Meeting
Chamber Waves: Mound Tree Lighting recap
Mound - Westonka High School Holiday Choir Concert
Mound - Westonka High School's "Whitehawks Weekly" (2)
Mound - Westonka High School Distinguished Student Awards
Mound - Westonka High School Girls Boys Basketball
Mound - Westonka High School Wrestling
Seniors on the Go! (Taped at the Gillespie Center)
•j
-33-
January 2009•
Lakeside News
LMCC Executive Committee Meeting
Capitol Update
Seniors on the Go!
Mound - Westonka High School's "Whitehawks Weekly" (2)
Mound - Westonka High School Boys Hockey
February 2009:
Lakeside News
LMCC Full Commission Meeting
Seniors on the Go!
Mound - Westonka High School Girls Basketball
Mound - Westonka High School Girls Hockey
Mound - Westonka High School District Band Concert
Mound - Westonka High School's "Whitehawks Weekly" (2)
March 2009:
•
Lakeside News
LMCC Executive Committee Meeting
Chamber Waves: Mid Winter Ball Preview
Seniors on the Gol
Tonka Report
Mound - Westonka High School's "Whitehawks Weekly" (2)
Public Access: Mark Hanus produces "Minnetonka Power Squadron" program
April 2009•
Lakeside News
LMCC Executive Committee Meeting
Seniors on the Go!
Mound - Westonka High School's "Whitehawks Weekly" (2)
Mound - Westonka High School Wrestling Highlights
Public Access: Greg Sletten produces Learning Guitar with Greg program (2)
May 2009-
Lakeside News
LMCC Full Commission Meeting
Seniors on the Go!
Mound - Westonka High School's "Whitehawks Weekly" (2)
Mound - Westonka High School Distinguished Student Awards
Mound Police Department: Operation Black Cat
Public Access: Mark Hanus produces "A Tribute to Arlington & Fort Snelling" program
0
-34-
June 2009:
•' Lakeside News
LMCC Executive Committee Meeting
Capitol Update
Mound - Westonka High School's Graduation Ceremony
Mound - Westonka High School Popsingers Concert
Our Lady of the Lake's 100 Year Celebration: Producer Kathleen Marie
Seniors on the Go!
July 2009•
Lakeside News
LMCC Executive Committee Meeting
Tonka Report
Seniors on the Go!
Spirit of the Lakes Parade (Announcer: Mound City Manager Kandis Hanson)
Auaust 2009:
Lakeside News
LMCC Full Commission Meeting
Seniors on the Go!
September 2009:
• Lakeside News
LMCC Executive Committee Meeting
Incredible Festival in Mound
LMCC Producer & Volunteer Awards Recognition
Seniors on the Go!
October 2009:
Lakeside News
LMCC Executive Committee Meeting
Westonka School Board Candidates Forum
Seniors on the Go!
November 2009:
Lakeside News
LMCC Meeting
Tonka Report
Chamber Waves: Mound Tree Lighting Event
Mound - Westonka High School Distinguished Student Awards
Mound - Westonka High School Popsingers Concert
Seniors on the Go!
•
-35-
Ch. 12 Programs Produced by Mound Residents:
Friendship Set to Music- Dee and Ken
Learning Guitar with Greg- Greg Sletten
Brad Curtis Speakout- Brad Curtis
Minnetonka Power Squadron- Mark Hanus
School Proerammine:
Mound - Westonka High School Sports- Kristin Wallace
Mound - Westonka High School Choir Concerts- Daphne Okey
Mound - Westonka High School Popsingers- Anne Hunt
Mound - Westonka High School Wrestling Highlights- Dan Saatzer
'`Westonka School Board Candidate Forum- LMCC Programming Partnership with
Westonka School Dictrict
Mound Residents Completed LMCC Classes December 2008 to present:
Eric Putkonen
Bob Blake
Kaisi Haarstad
Dee Scott
Daphne Okey
Greg Sletten
0
-36-
0 0 0 1
2009 Mound Usage Report
City Council
School Board
CC Streaming
CC Streaming
SB Streaming
SB Streamin
Date:
Meetings:
Meetings:
Sessions:
Me s:
Sessions:
Me s:
30 -Nov ,
2
1
41
459
61
138
31 -Dec
2
1
29
282
47
55
31 -Jan
2 I
1
67
306
58
82
28 -Feb
2
2
68
271
69
62
31 -Mar'
2
I 1
1 69
347
84
384
30 -A r
2
1
1 43
220
75
170
31 -Ma
2
1
44
222
59
174
30 -Jun
I 2
1
21
137
20
26
31-Jul
2
1
19
50
26
85
31 -Aug
1 2
0
33
134
10
23
07-Sep
1 2
1
40
461
18
157
31 -Oct ' 2
1
i 34
I 589
69
305
MOUND LOCAL PROGRAMMING FACILITIES AGREEMENT ANALYSIS
FOR JULY 21 2009 EXECUTIVE COMMITEE MEETING
Prepared by: Sally Koenecke
LMCC Executive Director
Date of Agreement: April 1, 2000
Purpose: Mound was losing their studio to demolition. They wanted to continue airing their
council meetings and have a studio for their residents to access. They had equipment that
they could contribute to a usage agreement. Both the City of Mound and the LMCC thought
the arrangement was mutually beneficial due to the acquisition of the studio cameras that
were higher quality than what the LMCC had at the time. They had their own channel 20 that was
also provided to the LMCC in the agreement.
Financial Arrangement: Due to the fact that Mound was charging a higher PEG fee (.84 vs the
LMCC's .50) a per subscriber amount was determined so that Mound was paying about the same
as the member cities per subscriber. They pay us the fu11.84 plus a portion of their franchise fee.
Scope of Services: The LMCC continues to carry out the scope of services as outlined in the
Agreement and provides the City of Mound with a yearly report of the services that have been
provided for that current year according to the agreement.
Payment of Fees: The City of Mound has paid the usage fee according to the Mound Local
Programming Facilities Agreement on a quarterly basis since the agreement was initiated in 2000.
This is the record of payment amount for the last four years totaling $172,849:
1 quarter 2' quarter 3' quarter 4' quarter
2005 10,450
10,456
13,794
7,559
2006 10,358
10,254
10,420
10,733
2007 10,855
10,775
10,903
11,084
2008 11,267
11,249
11,306
11,386
Usage: The residents of Mound have enrolled in workshops and continued to use the studio
as the agreement specifies. A number of Mound residents and non -profit organizations utilize our
facility and production assistance. Our production manager communicates with the City of Mound
and continues to assist in Mound programming. The LMCC looks at this programming as serving
the area and contributing to the economy, growth and success of the area. The Mayor of Mound
and his son took the LMCC production classes and produce regular programming on the Power
Squadron serving Lake Minnetonka This type of programming is mutually beneficial to our
member cities.
9
-38-
1 4
ANTICIPATED COSTS TO LMCC
OF TAKING ON THE CITY OF MOUND ACCESS OBLIGATIONS
•
Here's what I've been able to figure out so far:
Currently the access portion of our budget (minus administrative costs)
amounts to $121496 per year for the fifteen communities already part of the
LMCC. With a total number of subscribers from those communities of 8907
including EBU's /8786 excluding EBU's, that amounts to an expenditure of
$13.64/$13.83 per year. Figuring the city of Mound's subscriber base (and an
approximately Proportional increase of access studio usage when we begin to
serve Mound residents) at 2649, multiplied by that $13.64/$13.83 gives a
proportionate annual contribution of $36133/$36631 per year. This does not
include the costs of maintaining and programming a separate channel (channel
20) which I figure to be as follows:
character generator updating: 0:30 /day = $1248 /year
tape cueing and changing: 1:15 /day - $3120 /year
statistics (both usage and program) and scheduling 2:00 /mo = $200 /year
total additional channel 20 operational costs: $4568 /year
this does not include maintenance of the extra channel 20 equipment
•
W
-39-
•
OVERVIEW OF MEMBERSHIP
IN THE LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Benefits /Advantages to City Membership
Television Production Resources: Facilities, Staff, Workshops
The LMCC operates a television production studio for use by member cities,
non -profits and residents of those cities. It is located in Spring Park.
Professional production staff are employed to assist cities in the production of
governmental programming. Examples of this programming are city festivals,
National Night Out events, city concerts series and others. Election coverage last
year included candidates forums and candidates statements aired on our channels
and streamed over the internet.
Production staff also assist non profits and residents in programming.
Mound residents may take production and editing workshops free of charge (to •
the individual) to produce local programming. This has included non -profit
organizations that can get their services promoted locally.
The LMCC hires and trains contracted employees to videotape city council
meetings. This is not an extra charge to cities. These meetings are aired on cable as
well as streamed on- demand on the LMCC website. Member cities' websites can be
linked to the LMCC website for access to the streaming function.
- The LMCC has a production van that is used to produce programs that merit a two
or three camera production on location.
- The LMCC currently operates four channels, Channel 12 for community
programming, Channels 8 and 20 are for government programming and Channel
21 airs school district programming. When programming isn't airing on the
channels they are programmed with community announcements and program
promotions. (Please see our brochures.)
Programming, Promotion and Recognition
The LMCC staff produces some regular series programming to promote the area:
Lakeside News program with segments on various activities of member cities.
Tonka Report which features a panel of city administrators from member cities.
Capital Update which features the state legislators from our area.
The LMCC maintains a website to promote community programming as well as
to provide education about the commission to city residents. •
The LMCC promotes its services with brochures and advertising materials.
-40-
- The LMCC is a member of MACTA (Minnesota Association of Community
Telecommunications Administrators) and NATOA (National Association of
• Telecommunications Officers and Advisors). These organizations provide
information and education on telecommunications issues and regulations.
- The LMCC has garnered national and state awards for programs produced by
and for LMCC member cities.
Franchise Oversight
- The LMCC handles subscriber complaints from cities and residents and submits to
Mediacom for resolution. Mediacom must respond to our written complaints.
- The LMCC monitors the franchise agreement for compliance.
- The LMCC studies and researches new developments in telecommunications
(possible municipal fiber to the premise cable/broadband network currently under
study).
- The LMCC communicates and files comments with federal and state legislators and
the FCC with regard to telecommunications legislation.
Funding of the LMCC
- The franchise fees and PEG fees of the member cities are allocated to the LMCC
for operating and capital expenditures. The budget is approved each year by the
member cities.
Mound Considerations
- Any questions that Mound would have for the LMCC concerning
any further services would be considered by the LMCC for implementation.
•
-41-
Comparable Fees Analysis for Services Provided: is
Assessment based on first quarter fees:
LMCC
Quarterly
Monthly
Number of subs
10,236
Fran. Fees
$105,289 (102,113)
9.98. %5 ff. /sub
$3.33
PEG fees
25.896
2.53
.85
Total
$131,185
12.51 fees per sub
4.18
Mound Fees
Number of subs
2,505
Fran. Fees
$25,069 (23,426)
9.35 — 2.52 = 6.83
2.28
PEG fees
6.320
2.52 2.52
.84
31,390
11.87 9.35
3.12
Mound is currently pay 1.51 per sub a month. .84 cents for the PEG fee and
.67 per sub from franchise fees.
The original calculation was made between attorneys for Mound and the LMCC. At that time they
included the consideration of Mound's equipment that was approximately $60,000. That
calculation going forward could not be included due to depreciation. This calculation does include
capital expenditures when determining the percentage of the franchise administration. The %27
deduction ($2.52) for the franchise administration part of the budget which Mound does not
currently pay for has been subtracted.
Mound is currently paying the full $.84 cents PEG fee and a portion of their franchise fee. When
looking at the first quarter they paid:
$11,361 Mound payment
.6.320 PEG Fee (.84 /mo)
5,041 (This is 2.01 per subscriber or .67 per sub /mo. as per agreement)
As we know the LMCC increased their PEG fee by %70 percent from $.50 cents to $.85 cents.
The LMCC did not impose an increase on the City of Mound at that time.
If the LMCC wants to determine a more fair share going forward the above calculations gives
a more clear picture of what Mound could be paying if it continued to get the %27 discount or if it
became a member.
0
-42-
Mound meeting Notes: October 8, 2009
Rate Change
LMCC raised PEG fee .35 or 70%
Increased Service
Addition of van
Addition of streaming
Purchase of building
Additional Channel
Mound equipment depreciated after 10 years
Yearly financial audit
Study of broadband deployment
•,f
-43-
M ediacom
0
February 16, 2010
Dear LMCC Commissioners and Member City Community Officials:
As we begin 2010, Mediacom is delighted to report on some of the notable achievements
accomplished by our 200+ dedicated local Mediacom employees during the past year — 2009.
First and foremost, we're excited to inform you about the launch of our "new" 50 Mbps
Mediacom Ultra -fast high speed internet service, making this service among the fastest in the
State — and the country! This product bolsters our already popular high speed internet options
currently available for residential and business customers.
This improvement was made possible by modifications to our existing hybrid fiber optic
coaxial (HFC) network. This same network also provides the delivery method for our video
and telephone services. The latest revision to our network, including DOCSIS 3.0, enables our
existing facilities to increase our bandwidth capacity to provide additional and enhanced
broadband services.
On the video side of our business, we continue to add more and more high definition
programming to our already robust video channel programming line -up; pay -per view;
OnDemand video and an ever - growing digital television channel line -up.
And this year, we are proud to have launched a business class service to our business telephone
customers, an incredible value and a growing part of our business.
In regulatory matters, neighboring states to Minnesota have legislated statewide video
franchising and Minnesota is expected to continue discussing this issue related to cable
television. As you know, we currently operate under a franchise agreement with the Lake
Minnetonka Communications Commission (LMCC). If Minnesota approves statewide video
franchising, our franchise — for the most part — will be under the control of Minnesota
regulatory authorities. As a point of information, we've provided a detailed listing — by
community — of our Basic Video Subscriber Counts and the fees collected by Mediacom and
paid to the LMCC for 2009.
Of course, there are many behind the scenes improvements that are important to our business:
providing a state of the art work environment for Mediacom employees; interactive customer
service tools; expanded local programming and much more. At Mediacom, we're very proud
to be one of our industry's leaders in technology advancements and customer enhancements.
Mediacom Communications Corporation
1504 2 ND Street SE, Waseca, Minnesota 56093 01
Telephone: 507- 835 -2356 • Fax: 507- 835 -4567
-44-
Page Two,
LMCC Commissioner and Municipality Letter
February 16, 2010
•
e j
However, there are times when changes in technology are implemented with unanticipated
initial results. In an effort to maximize the benefits of our fiber broadband network, we have
been applying improvements to all of our products. For example: on the telephone side, we
are taking steps to manage phone traffic more effectively, migrating portions away from
vendors to self-management. On the Internet side, we have continued to increase our
downstream and upstream speeds. Our latest initiative in late November 2009 was intended to
provide a more robust email system. Despite our careful planning and testing, we had a
failure. The consequence of this actually highlighted a safety benefit to our Internet users. The
Internet safety guards designed to protect users and computers from SPAM worked and
properly shut down the malfunctioning portion of our new email servers. While it made for a
significant inconvenience for many customers and a very difficult matter to communicate, we
remained focused on the fix and the restoration of email traffic as expected.
All of us at Mediacom are proud to have the opportunity to provide our services in your
community. Also, as a business partner with your community, we regularly contribute to your
local economy through our franchise and PEG Fee payments as well as local event
sponsorships. Mediacom will continue to be focused on the future and can assure you our
company will keep pace with technological improvements and offer you the latest broadband
products!
Sincerely,
Bill Jensen Tom Bordwell
Regional Vice President Senior Manager, Government Relations
A 044-1t'��
Theresa Sunde
Community Affairs
-45-
Page Three,
LMCC Commissioner and Municipality Letter
February 16, 2010
Mediacom
Community
Basic
Video
Customers
As of
1/11/2010
Estimated Franchise / PEG Fees
Paid Annual/
Dee haven
800
$48,160
Excelsior
868
$52,253
Greenwood
158
$9,511
Independence
186
$11,197
Long Lake
422
$25,404
Loretto
142
$8,548
Maple Plain
405
$24,381
Medina
649
$39,069
Minnetonka
Beach
128
$7,705
Minnetrista
678
$40,815
Orono
1,409
$84,821
Shorewood
1,610
$96,922
Spring Park
352
$21,190
St. Bonifacius
568
$34,193
Tonka Bay
372
$22,394
Victoria
1,278
$76,935
Woodland
96
$5,779
TOTALS
10,121
$609,277
0
•
0
-46-
Catherine Pausche
• , I From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Hi Catherine,
Dick Woodruff [dick.woodruff @yahoo.coml
Monday, November 22, 2010 11:56 AM
Catherine Pausche
Sally Koenecke
LMCC Fiber Network Market Survey
RFP For FTTP Survey 110810 Final.doc
The LMCC will be conducting a market survey to determine if residential users in its member cities would
subscribe to the Fiber -To -The -Home network we've been discussing. The RFP for the survey has been released
and responses are due back December 3rd. The actual survey is planned for 1Q11.
We'd like to include Mound and Wayzata in the survey. However, we're asking that the survey cost be borne by
each city as they are not LMCC members. I won't know the cost until responses are back on the 3rd. I expect
something in the $ 2,000 range for M ound as only the incremental cost of surveying in Mound would need to be
paid by Mound.
The intent of this email is to let Mound know what is happening and alert you that the LMCC will be coming
back, soon, with an offer for Mound to participate in the survey.
I'm attaching the RFP. Also, see the following link that details the competitive landscape and compares it to
what Monticello is doing. www.newrules.orWpublications (see "Twin Cities Broadband No Match..." paper at
top of page).
I'd be happy to meet with your Council if that would be helpful.
Dick Woodruff
Commissioner - LMCC
• ;r
-47-
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION •
FIBER -TO- THE - PREMISE
MARKET SURVEY
November 8, 2010
Purpose and Background:
The Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (LMCC) requests proposals for
conducting a Market Survey (Survey) to ascertain the potential market for a Fiber -To-
The- Premise (FTTP) network serving residential and business customers as well as
public entities in the LMCC's member cities. The purpose of this Survey is to evaluate
whether a viable market exists for such a FTTP network.
More information about the FTTP project may be found on the project's website:
www.tonkaconnect.com
The LMCC is a municipal joint powers organization, established under Minnesota law,
with Members consisting of the cities of Deephaven, Woodland, Greenwood, Shorewood,
Excelsior, Tonka Bay, Victoria, St Bonifacius, Minnetrista, Spring Park, Minnetonka
Beach, Orono, Long Lake, Medina, Independence, Maple Plain and Loretto.
The scope of the Survey will be the above listed Member cities, plus the cities of Mound
and Wayzata.
Household and population Y ulation data for the cities to be surveyed are in Table 1 at the end of •
this RFP.
The LMCC has approved 2011 budget money to conduct the Survey.
The Survey is to be completed as early as possible in 1 St quarter of 2011 with completion
and final report no later than the end of March 2011.
Proposals are requested from Proposers that can demonstrate prior experience in
successfully completing similar surveys for similar FTTP networks and can meet the
other requirements listed in this RFP.
Disclosure of Proposals:
The LMCC is subject to the State of Minnesota Data Practices Act. Proposers' responses,
the Survey questions, Survey reports and all other materials and correspondence relating
to the Survey will become available to the public. Proposers including proprietary or
trade secret information in their proposals shall mark such information as such if they
wish to protect it from public disclosure. The LMCC shall protect such information to
the extent allowed by Minnesota law.
Survey Methodology:
- The Survey shall be conducted by professional interviewers using the telephone •
-48-
The Survey shall be conducted such that within each survey group (see Groups
defined below) a statistical accuracy of 95% with a plus /minus range of 5 %, or
• less, shall be achieved
The Survey shall be of potential residential users of the FTTP network within the
Member cities plus, Mound and Wayzata
Assumptions and Costing:
Proposers shall provide cost of the Survey assuming:
- Four groupings of Member cities allowing for cost control and geographic
grouping
• Group 1: Woodland, Deephaven, Greenwood, Shorewood
• Group 2: Excelsior, Tonka Bay, Minnetonka Beach, Spring Park
• Group 3: Victoria, St Bonifacius, Minnetrista
• Group 4: Long Lake, Orono, Medina, Loretto, Independence, Maple Plain
- The cities of Mound and Wayzata are to be surveyed individually
- The proposal shall allow the LMCC to obtain surveying of individual Member
cities (i.e. allow individual cities to be removed from their Group) and shall
identify a per -city survey cost.
- The statistical accuracy requirements stated above shall apply to any cities
individually surveyed.
- The Survey shall consist of questions developed by the Proposer, using
information supplied by the LMCC about the proposed FTTP network and
services anticipated to be delivered. It is expected that the Proposer will rely
heavily on its experience and the questions used in conducting prior successful
surveys in question development and will lead the LMCC in question
development
- The Survey telephone interview shall take no more than ten minutes and be
conducted by professional telephone surveyors. Proposers shall state the
qualifications and geographic location of the surveyors. No offshore surveyors are
to be used
- The Proposer shall obtain the phone numbers of those to be surveyed
- The LMCC can provide population and other demographics of the cities
Survey Reporting:
- The Proposer shall deliver the Survey raw questions and responses to the LMCC
in a mutually agreed upon form that the LMCC can manipulate such as Excel
format.
- For each Surveyed Group and any individually surveyed cities, a survey report
shall be provided. The Report shall summarize the responses. The Report format
and content shall be negotiated once a contract has been awarded. Proposers are
encouraged to supply examples of similar reports with their proposals.
Qualifications and References:
Fa
-49-
Proposers shall supply information establishing their successful experience in •
conducting similar surveys including a summary of survey question development
methodology, methodology used to conduct the survey, sample reports and
proposed project timeline
Three references shall be supplied. References shall be ones for which Proposer
has successfully completed a similar Survey
Proposer shall list who in Proposer's organization will be responsible for project
management, for survey question development, for conducting the telephone
survey and for reporting. Prior experience and relevant background shall be
provided
Proposal Schedule and Delivery:
- This RFP will be released on or about November 17, 2010
- Proposals placed in an envelope or package marked "FTTP Survey Proposal" and
received by 4:00 PM Central Time on December 3, 2010 in the LMCC office at
4071 Sunset Dr., Spring Park, MN 55384, Attn: Sally Koenecke. The LMCC
may, but is not required to, accept late submittals.
- Four hard copies and one electronic copy of the proposal shall be provided. These
materials will be retained by the LMCC and are not returnable
- Proposers are discouraged from supplying excessive materials
- Proposals shall be signed by an individual authorized to bind the Proposer's
organization
- The LMCC intends to enter a contract for surveying services by December 31,
2010 •
Proposal Selection and Contract:
- The LMCC will evaluate proposals based upon their responsiveness to the terms
of this RFP, the prior experience of the Proposer, the cost and on results of
reference checks
- The LMCC is not obligated to accept any or all of the proposals
- The LMCC is not obligated to accept the lowest cost proposal
- The proposal selected will be incorporated by reference in the project contract
Questions and LMCC Contact:
- Questions about this RFP and the Survey project shall be directed to Sally
Koenecke, Executive Director LMCC, by email at: sallyQlmcc- tv.org
- Questions received prior to the RFP due date, with responses, will be sent to all
entities receiving this RFP
0,
3
-50-
Table 1
• € Metropolitan Council 2009 Estimates
•. , F ,
4
Population
Households
Deephaven
3814
1399
Greenwood
806
330
Woodland
503
184
Shorewood
7618
2674
Excelsior
2360
1193
Tonka Bay
1549
636
Minnetrista
6296
2206
St Bonifacius
2363
892
Minnetonka Beach
614
219
Spring Park
1868
1053
Orono
7980
3029
Long Lake
1745
727
Medina
5026
1739
Maple Plain
1932
748
Loretto
609
242
Independence
3739
1259
Victoria
6727
2373
Subtotal
55549
20903
Mound
9787
4220
Wayzata
. Total
4115
69451
193
27062
•. , F ,
4
Catherine Pausche Mea,t
Subject: Mediacom's response to Fiber to the home effort
•
From: Thomas Bordwell f mailto:tbordwell @ mediacomcc.com1
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 2:30 PM
To: Catherine Pausche
Subject: RE: Internet and Cable /Satellite Rates for Newsletter, Due 7/1/10
Hi Catherine:
Thanks for checking in for our side of the story. Nothing could be further from the truth. Mediacom has never been
asked to partner with the LMCC. In fact, we have invited them numerous times over the past few years to visit our
facilities and learn more about our services and not once have they taken the time to do so. And for the record, we are
always willing to discuss ways in which we can better provide our products and services for our customers.
Mediacom has both fiber optic and coaxial cable plant (Hybrid Fiber Optic Coaxial) that provides video, high speed
internet data, and telephone services to residents and businesses throughout Mound and in almost 200 cities in
Minnesota. We do the same in more than 20 other States. It is a technology (HFC) that works and is the #1 preferred
delivery method for the entire cable telecommunications industry. in fact, Comcast in the Twin Cities as well as Charter
Communications throughout Minnesota utilize the same HFC technology that we do at Mediacom. HFC technology is
scalable to meet the demands for additional services. We currently have some of the fastest residential internet speeds
in Minnesota at 50Mbs. And we can go faster. What will drive that change is simply market demand. The question to
be asked of TonkaConnect is: Why build a new road when one already exists?
I cannot comment on the Monticello situation as we do not provide services there. I understand that they capitalized
the first five years of operation as part of their debt, so I am unsure how one would measure the financial success or
failure at this point. I will drop off some information about the group in Utah that also followed the path planned by
TonkaConnect. The other much touted City, Windom MN, also is still in operation and has restructured their financing
numerous times.
Specifically to you question about our plans in Mound and your question of what it would take for Mediacom to deploy
a fiber to the home network: let's talk!
Thank you!
Tom
From: Catherine Pausche fmailto: catherinepausche (6cityofmound.com]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 11:43 AM
To: Thomas Bordwell
Subject: RE: Internet and Cable /Satellite Rates for Newsletter, Due 7/1/10
HI Tom,
Tonkaconnect plans on doing a survey to see if people are interested in fiber to the home /subscribing. I am not sure
how it is going to be handled, but our Council will be discussing participation next week.
I asked a rep of Tonkaconnect if the LMCC has tried to work with Mediacom to partner in getting fiber to the home, an
he says Mediacom was unwilling to discuss. What is Mediacom's position on what happened in Monticello and what is
your long term strategy for services to Mound residents? What would it take for Mediacom to get fiber to the home in
Mound, not so much the rest of the LMCC area?
Catherine Pausche
Finance Director
-52-
t
MEDIACOM RATES as of 7/1/10
Rates /Package Descriptions:
Broadcast Basic: 33 channels of PEG Access, major networks (NBC, CBS, etc) religious, educational and
local networks. $25.95 per month
Family Cable: 79 channels of the most popular cable networks including ESPN, Fox Sports, Big Ten
Network, TLC, TNT, Lifetime and many more. $62.95 per month
High Definition: Mediacom offers 45 High Definition channels including all the local networks (NBC, CBS,
etc), Premium channels such as HBO and Showtime, and 31 of the Family Cable networks with more
channels launching later this summer. All Digital Cable subscribers receive 38 of the HD channels FREE
when they have an High Definition Digital Box from Mediacom. A swap of a standard definition box to a
HD box is free of charge and there is no additional monthly fees.
Digital Cable: Premium movie channel packages can be added on to any package for as low as $12.95
per month (without a special). The price includes either a Standard Definition Box or a High Definition
box. Starz and Encore offers 13 channels, Showtime & The Movie Channel offer 9 channels, HBO offers
7 channels and Cinemax offers 8 channels.
Digital Plus is an a la carte package which includes over 50 great channels such as National Geographic
Channel, The Golf Channel, Nicktoon, Boomerang, Lifetime Movie Network and 9 sports orientated
channels. Digital Plus is available for $12.00 per month.
The Sports Pak offers 10 all sports channels for only $3.95 per month and includes CBS College Sports,
• The Tennis Channels, three channels Fox College Sports and more.
Digital Video Recorder (DVR): DVR's are available to all customers regardless of their current television
package. DVR service is available for only $10.95 per month. There may be additional digital box
charges. Multi -Room Digital Video Recorder Service is a new service available by Mediacom. The Multi -
Room DVR includes a larger hard drive to record and store more programs and multiple units so
programs can be recorded and viewed in more than 1 location at a time!
High Speed Internet. Mediacom offers a variety of High Speed Internet packages to fit the needs of our
customers. Mediacom Online, the most popular internet package offers speeds up to 12 Mbps / 1
Mbps. Mediacom Online is $47.95 per month *. Mediacom Online Max offers speeds up to 20 Mbps / 2
Mbps and is ready for all the gamers or customers who would like the extra speeds. Online Max is
available for $59.95 per month *. For those that want even more speed, Mediacom Ultra 50 is now
available with speeds up to 50 Mbps / 5 Mbps. Ultra 50 is $99.99 per month. And for those who are
looking for a constant connection and swift speeds, Mediacom Online Intro is a perfect package.
Offering up to 3 Mbps / 256 kbps speeds for only $29.95 per month *.
Each Mediacom High Speed Internet package includes up to 11 email addresses (Online Intro offers 1
email address), CA Security Suite Software including personal firewall, anti -spam, virus scan and more,
access to ESPN3.com and ABCNewsNow.com and 24/7 tech support.
*All prices for Mediacom High Speed Internet are when combined with any other Mediacom service.
Mediacom Phone: Mediacom Phone offers unlimited local and Long Distance calling to all the 50 United
States, Canada, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands and Guam and includes the most popular calling features
• such as call waiting, caller ID, 3 -way calling, call forwarding and all the star ( *) features. Mediacom
customers get to keep their existing phone number for no additional charge and use all their existing
-53-
home wiring and equipment. Mediacom Phone is available for as low as $29.95 per month when
bundled with Mediacom Family Cable and Mediacom Online. 0
Bundles & Specials ": New Mediacom customers can bundle all three services; Digital Cable with a
premium channel, High Speed Internet and Phone service for as low as $24.95 each per month. Current
customers can bundle their services with Mediacom and receive a great rate as well! Since each
customer is different and has different package preferences, please call Mediacom's customer service @
1- 800 - 332 -0245.
•
-54-
*I !
NOTE: Please bring your preliminary budget materials from the
Tuesday, August 24, 2010 Council meeting. Please call me if I
need to send you another copy.
MEMO
Date: November 23, 2010
To: Mayor and Council
From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director
Re: General Fund Forecast and 2011 Budget
Attached is a high level summary of the 2010 budget and forecast compared to the 2011
• preliminary budget and 2009 prior -year actuals. We are projecting that we will meet our
budget, with a 3% favorable variance in taxes being offset by the fact we did not issue
equipment certificates in 2010 and plan to transfer $50,000 to the street light replacement
project.
As we finalize the 2011 budget, we will need to approve changes to the gas and electric
franchise fees as per the Council's request. Staff will seek some other input to proposed
changes to the preliminary budget at the meeting, but it is anticipated that, in any case,
the budget will remain break -even with a 20 %+ undesignated fund balance.
-55-
City of Mound
General Fund Forecast - 2010
DESCRIPTION
Total Taxes
3,861,424
3,986,864
125,440
3,886,424
100,440 3,956,429
30,434
Franchise Fees
397,000
425,320
28,320
397,000
28,320
330,277
95,043
Licenses and Permits
117,200
152,419
35,219
108,900
43,519
115,203
37,216 = => increase permit rev
Intergovernmental
122,060
124,007
1,947
134,060
(10,053)
156,113
(32,105)
Charges for Services
272,650
260,229
(12,421)
221,828
38,401
189,418
70,811
Fines and Forfeitures
60,000
60,483
483
55,000
5,483
63,370
(2,888)
Transfers & Bonds
105,625
0
(105,625)
0
0
161,205
(161,205)
Other Revenue
393,920
407,988
14,068
418,900
(10,912
482,612
(74,624
Total Revenues
5,329,879
5,417,311
87,432
5,222,112
195,199
5,454,628
(37,317)
a
' Total Salaries & Benefits
3,030,329
3,027,534
2,795
3,008,615
(18,919)
3,149,223
121,689 = => add 20% Admin in Streets
Total Supplies
273,510
284,237
(10,727)
, `-249;600 -
(34,637)
275,012
(9,225) ? ??
Total Professional Services
286,789
294,103
(7,314)
274,942
(19,161)
260,687
(33,416) = => increase MNSPECT
Total Phone, Postage & Print
73,620
65,823
7,797
69,020
3,197
65,716
(107)
Total Insurance
53,652
68,306
(14,654)
51,160 �'
(15,146)
50,454
(17,851)
Total Utilities
167,260
140,178
27,082
157,900
17,722
142,447
2,269
Total Repairs & Maint
125,400
146,134
(20,734)
141,300
(4,834)
146,095
(38)
Total Other Contracts & Rental
407,280
404,134
3,146
419,650
15,516
388,306
(15,828)
Total Deprec & Capital Exp
181,750
191,815
(10,065)
123,981
(67,834)
211,606
19,791
Total Debt Service
0
0
0
0
0
4,542
4,542
Total Misc, Interest & Other
213,440
207,014
6,427
205,610
(1,404)
179,541
(27,473)
Total Transfers
518,600
571,862
(53,262
516.600
(55.262
553,912
(17,950) =_> Transfer to Street Light Proj
Total Expenditures
5,331.630
5,401.139
(69,50
5,220,378
(180,761
5,427.541
26.403
Incr(Decr) Net Assets
(1,751)
16,172
17,923
1,734
14,438
27,086
(10,915)
0
• •
City of Mound
General Fund F orecast - 2010
• f
DESCRIPTION
Total Taxes
3,861,424
3,986,864
125,440
3,886,424
100,440 3,956,429
30,434
Franchise Fees
397,000
425,320
28,320
397,000
28,320
330,277
95,043
Licenses and Permits
117,200
152,419
35,219
108,900
43,519
115,203
37,216
Intergovernmental
122,060
124,007
1,947
134,060
(10,053)
156,113
(32,105)
Charges for Services
272,650
260,229
(12,421)
221,828
38,401
189,418
70,811
Fines and Forfeitures
60,000
60,483
483
55,000
5,483
63,370
(2,888)
Transfers & Bonds
105,625
0
(105,625)
0
0
161,205
(161,205)
Other Revenue
393,920
407,988
14,068
418,900
(10,912
482,612
(74,624
Total Revenues
5,329,879
5,417,311
87,432
5,222,112
195,199
5,454,628
(37,317)
Gain on Sale of Assets
3,000
0
3,000
0
0
0
0
Council
79,991
88,379
(8,388)
77,960
(10,419)
80,552
(7,826)
Promotions
71,500
71,500
0
71,500
0
17,400
(54,100)
City Manager /City Clerk
327,779
305,132
22,647
312,054
6,922
331,315
26,183
Elections
18,375
19,340
(965)
2,650
(16,690)
1,059
(18,281)
• Legal
140,506
135,610
4,896
131,500
(4,110)
128,488
(7,121)
Finance
326,745
323,484
3,262
335,257
11,773
314,013
(9,470)
Assessing
95,650
93,799
1,851
95,600
1,801
92,888
(910)
Computer
29,800
35,048
(5,248)
37,950
2,903
45,872
10,825
Police
1,883,187
1,873,973
9,214
1,932,170
58,197
1,968,437
94,464
Emergency Preparedness
25,950
26,667
(717)
8,150
(18,517)
13,926
(12,741)
Planning & Inspection
363,098
342,915
20,183
310,619
(32,296)
316,924
(25,990)
City Hall Building & Srvs
102,845
99,155
3,690
110,100
10,945
104,770
5,615
Streets
714,552
722,237
(7,685)
701,178
(21,059)
775,663
53,426
Recreation - Community Service
5,000
3,963
1,037
2,500
(1,463)
5,000
1,037
Parks
536,883
531,141
5,742
479,198
(51,943)
513,267
(17,874)
Cemetery
11,239
8,885
2,354
11,100
2,215
8,759
(126)
Cable TV
45,230
45,128
102
47,492
2,364
45,151
22
Contingency & Misc.
31,700
76,851
(45,151)
36,800
(40,051)
81,168
4,317
Fund Transfers
518,600
571,862
(53,262)
516,600
(55,262)
553,912
(17,950)
Park Dedication Fees
0
11,380
(11,380)
0
(11,380)
28,977
17,597
Total Expenditures
5,331,630
5,401,139
(69,509
5,220,378
(180,761
5,427,541
26,403
Incr(Decr) Net Assets
(1,751)
16,172
17,923
1,734
14,438
27,086
(10,915)
-57-
Fees charged to residents
General Street Light Fee 2.50 4.00 ? $18,000
(101)
General Excel Franchise Fee 2.00 3.00 2.75 -8% $15,000
(101)
General CPE Franchise Fee 2.00 3.00 2.75 -8% $10,000
(101)
Cost of Salary Increases (budget assumes 0% for 2011
Ir
General
2,100,406.00
21,004.06
423,408.87
4,234.09 25,238.15
(101)
Fire Svc
121,246.00
1,212.46
22,915.49
229.15 1,441.61
(222)
Liquor
137,899.00
1,378.99
26,062.91
260.63 1,639.62
(609)
Water
(601)
231,600.00
2,316.00
43,772.40
437.72 2,753.72
Sewer
281,629.00
2,816.29
53,227.88
532.28 3,348.57
(602)
Storm
26,169.00
261.69
4,945.94
49.46 311.15
(675)
Total
2,898,949.00
28,989.49
547,901.36
5,743.34 34,732.83
MEMO
Date: November 23, 2010
To: Mayor and Council
From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director
Re: Long Term Forecast and Capital Improvement Plans
The following pages provide information on the long -term forecast and capital
improvement plans as follows:
1)
Tax Levy History and Projections — Actual and projected changes in the
General Fund, Special Levies and the Tax Capacity from 2008 — 2015.
Special Levy projections to show the actual levy needed for debt service on
bonds issued for Street Improvement projects and the corresponding impact
10)
on the total levy.
2)
Request to extend Street Light Replacement Project to Highland
Boulevard
3)
Utility Rate Analysis — Rate scenarios to consider for offsetting current
deficits
4)
Liquor Store Forecast — Discussion on doing an interfund loan to pay off
bonds (callable in 2011) and offset negative cash. Projection for surplus funds
available to transfer to the Seal Coat Fund, in addition to the $35,000 the fund
currently pays for Administration and Finance Charges.
Summaries of the Capital Improvement Plans for street replacement and the utility funds
through 2015 will be provided at the meeting.
0 )
-59-
CITY OF MOUND
TAX LEVY HISTORY AND PROJECTIONS
I �
0
TAX LEVIES
REVENUE - GENERAL FUND
REVENUE - LEASE PAYMENTS
FIRE RELIEF
G.O. DEBT SERVICE LEVIES
TOTAL SPECIAL LEVIES
% Increase in Total Levy
Less Fiscal Disparity Rec'd
NET LEVY
Tax Capacity
% Change in Tax Cap
Less Fiscal Disparity Contrib
Less TIF Received
Net Tax Capacity (per HC)
Tax Rate
SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT
HRA Levy (Deck 1 debt svc & maint)
2008 2009
3,586,501
3,726,374
366,860
366,860
72,120
74,404
902.570
1.005.949
5.19%
4.98%
- 321,170
- 345,286
4,606,881
4,828,301
13, 956, 284
14, 687, 788
9.78%
5.24%
- 237,614
- 237,614
- 485,533
485,533
13,233,137
13,964, 641
34.816%
34.579%
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
- 345,717
- 360,618
___> project 2% increase to General Fund Levy, 3% Fire Relief
3,726,374
3,726,374
3,800,902
3,876,920
3,954,458
4,033,547
392,789
392,789
392,789
392,789
380,000
380,000
76,030
78,311
80,660
83,080
85,572
88,140
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
1.106.660
1.209,999
1.431.438
1.548.918
1.695.101
1.756.043
See sheet
2.48%
1.99%
5.52°A
3.43%
3.62%
2.33%
- 345,717
- 360,618
- 360,618
- 360,618
- 360,618
- 360,618
4,956,136
5,046,855
5,345,171
5,541,089
5,754,513
5,897,112
14,016,474
12,684,248
12,684,248
12,684,248
12,684,248
12,684,248
- 4.57%
-9.50%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
- 237,614
- 263,339
- 263,339
- 263,339
- 263,339
- 263,339
485, 533
- 443, 093
- 443,093
- 443,093
- 443,093
- 443,093
13,293,327
11,977,816
11,977,816
11,977,816
11,977,816
11,977,816
37.287%
45.146%
47.636%
49.272%
51.054%
52.244%
0
I '
a
r
LU70
V,
100,000
0
0
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
1,212,380
45,000
74,281 380,000
108,401 1,820,062
CITY OF MOUND
(196,767)
2023
0-
2016
36`000
00
325,000
85,D00
62,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
SPECIAL LEVIES / DEBT LEVIES
1,562,380
45,000
151,120
380,000
90,784
2,265,284
2%
41,101
2017
0:
325,000
85,000
62,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
Levy for $1 M. 15 YR. 3% bonds, 50% Special
Assessed
138,535
380,000
93,507
2,219,422
2%
(45,861)
2018
0
325,000
85,000
62,000
150,000
63,000
235,000
25% prepaid, rest assessed at 5%
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
1,584,380
45,000
130,427
380,000
96,313
2,236,120
1%
16,697
2019
.�
300.000
85,000
62,000
YR 2 -15 $45K, Yr 16 $25K
63,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
1,559,3110
45,000
115,139
Total :
$X.xxM
$1.765M
$1.6M
$2.725M
$1.675M
$3.94M
E3632M" fVii M "43.4461111
$ ?M
S ?M.
Total
$2.3M
$4.1M
Pub Sfty
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
Equip, ;
2011 Ref
2005 GO
2006 GO
2007 GO
2008 GO
2009 GO
2011 GO 2012 GO 2013 GO
2014 GO
2015 GO
GO
20030
20090 GO TIF
Lease
Fire
235,000
163,440
157,770
Certificates;
Bonds
Impr
Impr
Impr
Impr
Impr
Impr Impr Impr
Impr
Impr
Improv
GO Tax Ina
Dump Bonds
Payments
Relief
Collect Yr
2005- = 201'1
t
Fd 3xx
Fd 368
Fd 369
Fd 361
Fd 362
Fd 363
Fd 3XX Fd 3XX Fd 3XX
Fd 3XX
Fd 3XX
2001 -2011
Fd 355
Fd 101
+3% r
Fd 101
Total
% Ch $ Ina
2008
292 3691
232,362
65,100
29,252
116,270
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
442,984
146,717
0
366,860
72,120
1,321,050
2009
216,873;
251,554
72,100
31,520
116,385
150,700
0
0 0 0
0
0
622,259
146,717
0
366,860
74,404
1,427,113
8% 106,063
2010
295;716'
255,000
70,000
58,000
128,000
63,000
172,344
0 0 0
0
0
746,344
45,000
0
392,789
76,030
1,555,879
9% 128,766
2011
16 6 6;450;
419,200
75,0 00
58,000
128,000
63,000
136,000
0 0 0
0
0
879,200
45,000
120,349
392,789
78,311
1,681,099
8% 125,220
2012
140;950
388,000
85,000
58,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440 0 0
0
0
1,120,440
45,000
125,048
392,789
80,860
1,904,887
13% 223,788
2013
96,100-
388,0 00
85,000
58,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440 157,770 0
0
0
1,278,210
45,000
127,608
392,789
83,080
2,024,787
6% 119,900
2014
x97;050:
350,000
85,000
58,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440 157,770 155,070
0
0
1,395,280
45,000
157,771
380,000
85,572
2,160,673
7% 135,886
I '
a
r
LU70
V,
100,000
0
0
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
1,212,380
45,000
74,281 380,000
108,401 1,820,062
10%
(196,767)
2023
0-
2016
36`000
00
325,000
85,D00
62,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94.050
1,562,380
45,000
151,120
380,000
90,784
2,265,284
2%
41,101
2017
0:
325,000
85,000
62,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
1,562,380
45,000
138,535
380,000
93,507
2,219,422
2%
(45,861)
2018
0
325,000
85,000
62,000
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
1,584,380
45,000
130,427
380,000
96,313
2,236,120
1%
16,697
2019
.�
300.000
85,000
62,000
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
1,559,3110
45,000
115,139
380,000
99,202
2,198,721
-2%
(37,399)
2020
0`
225,000
85,000
62,000
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
1,484,380
45,000
98,993
380,000
102,178
2,110,551
-4%
(88,170)
2021
0'
225,000
0
62,000
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
1,399,380
45,000
87,205
380,000
105,243
2,016,828
-4%
(93,723)
2022
V,
100,000
0
0
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
1,212,380
45,000
74,281 380,000
108,401 1,820,062
10%
(196,767)
2023
0-
75,000
0
0
0
56,000
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
1,030,380
0
65,436 380,000
111,653 1,587,469
-13%
(232,593)
2024
0'
0
0
0
0
0
235,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
899,380
0
65,673
115,002 1,080,055
-32%
(507,413)
2025
0:
0
0
0
0
0
245,000
163,440
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
909,380
0
43,031
952,411
-12%
(127,644)
2026
0+
0
0
0
0
0
90,800
157,770
155,070
94,050
94,050
591,740
0
0
591,740
-38%
(360,671)
2027
0
0
0
0
0
0
87,650
155,070
94,050
94,050
430,820
0
430,820
-27%
(160,920)
11/23/2010
I N
City of Mound
Street Project Assessment Analysis
Bond Issue Amount
Total Project Cost after transfers
$ Assessed
$ Assessed vs. Total Proj. Cost
% Assessed vs. Total Proj. Cost
% of Total Assessments Prepaid
*undserver\shareddata\Fl NANCE DEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PP*TS \SPECIAL ASESSMENT LEVY INFO \SP Assess Comparis*
2005A
2006A
2007A
2008B
2009A �p \t3 as
1,765,000
1,600,000
2,725,000
1,675,000
3,940,000- �p0
1,144,960
1,573,022
2,235,400
1,598,567
3,391,210
834,988
893,067
1,094,651
794,876
1,558,645
(309,972)
(679,955)
(1,140,749)
(803,691)
(1,832,565)
72.93%
56.77%
48.97%
49.72%
45.96%
20.19%
19.89%
26.94%
26.58%
24.70%
*undserver\shareddata\Fl NANCE DEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PP*TS \SPECIAL ASESSMENT LEVY INFO \SP Assess Comparis*
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
•)
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Carlton Moore, Public Works Director
Date: November 23, 2010
Subject: Budget Discussion - Extension of new street lighting along Bartlett Blvd. to
Highland Blvd.
Background
The recently installed street lighting along Commerce Blvd. ends at the intersection of Bartlett
Boulevard near Kirby's Bait Shop. It is recommended that the Council consider extending the
new street lighting to the intersection with Highland Boulevard. It is anticipated that 12
additional lights would be needed, consistent with the spacing of the current lights, and that
the cost of the installation and lights is estimated to be approximately $140,000. The project
could be designed over the next few months and be ready for construction in the spring of
2011.
In addition, Staff recommends additional electric service be constructed for Mound Bay Park
• . to facilitate all the activities held there which require additional power. The estimated cost of
this improvement is approximately $10,000. Should Council approve the extension of the
lighting idea, a formal agreement would be presented to the council for retaining a consultant
for the design and inspection of the project.
The funding source would be a combination of the MSA funds and a portion of the monthly
Street Lighting fee. Electrical improvements for Mound Bay Park would be provided from the
General Fund.
i
-63-
I �
A
• • •
0 .0 0
City of Mound
Utility Funds - 2010 Budget
I ,
a
U
Total
Water
Sewer
Storm
Total Revenues
2,868,738
1,200,000
1,439,250
229,488
Total Salaries & Benefits
826,862
375,316
396,103
55,443
Total Supplies
136,150
85,850
44,800
5,500
Total Cost of Goods Sold
0
0
0
0
Total Professional Services
161,226
71,510
39,447
50,269
Total Phone, Postage & Print
26,100
13,300
12,700
100
Total Insurance
32,589
16,927
15,662
0
Total Utilities
663,175
55,000
608,175
0
Total Repairs & Maint
65,500
48,000
17,500
0
Total Other Contracts & Rental
71,500
26,000
25,500
20,000
Total Deprec & Capital Exp
1,019,000
555,000
354,000
110,000
Total Debt Service
673,100
443,700
124,700
104,700
Total Misc, Interest & Other
14,800
8,000
6,800
0
Total Transfers
0
0
0
0
Total Expenditures
3,690,002
1,698,603
1,645,387
346,012
Incr(Decr) Net Assets
- 821,264
- 498,603
- 206,137
- 116,524
City of Mound
Water Rate Scenarios 2011
(15% incr tier, 140% incr. base)
Scenario '6 4.21 4.8S 5:57 36.00 1,624,462 494,580.00
(20% incr tier, 140% incr. base)
Scenario 7 4.39 5.05 5.80 39.00 1,714,490 584,608.00
(25% incr tier, 160% incr. base)
Scenario 8 4.56 5.25 6.03 42.00 1 673,955.00
(30% incr tier, 180% incr. base)
Assumptions /Information
2010 actual usage is down about 8 -9%
Decreased 2008 -2009 usage for 25k+ accts by 20% (10% for 2010 and 10% for 2011)
With every .25 increase to each tier an additional $57,590 revenue is created
With every $1 per month base rates are raised an additional $44,736 revenue is created
•
7
•
SAFINANCE DEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTS \Department Analysis \UTILITY ANALYSIS & WATER RATE
STUDY \Rate Scenarios 2011
-66-
Total Projected
Increase in
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Base /Qtr
Revenue
Revenue
Current Rates 3.51
4.04
4.64
15.00
1,129,882
-
Scenario 1 3.51
4.04
4.64
27.00
1,305,586
175,704.00
(0% incr tier, 80% incr. base)
Scenario 2 3.69
4.24
4.87
27.00
1,354,118
224,236.00
(5% incr tier, 80% incr. base)
Scenario 3 3.86
4.44
5.10
27.00
1,398,729
268,847.00
(10% incr tier, 80% incr. base)
Scenario 4 3.86
4.44
5.10
33.00
1,488,201
358,319.00
(10% incr tier, 120% incr. base)
Scenario 5 4.04
4.65
5.34
36.00
1,579,851
449,969.00
Scenario 7 4.39 5.05 5.80 39.00 1,714,490 584,608.00
(25% incr tier, 160% incr. base)
Scenario 8 4.56 5.25 6.03 42.00 1 673,955.00
(30% incr tier, 180% incr. base)
Assumptions /Information
2010 actual usage is down about 8 -9%
Decreased 2008 -2009 usage for 25k+ accts by 20% (10% for 2010 and 10% for 2011)
With every .25 increase to each tier an additional $57,590 revenue is created
With every $1 per month base rates are raised an additional $44,736 revenue is created
•
7
•
SAFINANCE DEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTS \Department Analysis \UTILITY ANALYSIS & WATER RATE
STUDY \Rate Scenarios 2011
-66-
City of Mound
Sewer Rate Scenarios 2011
•
Residential
Commercial
Total Projected
Increase in
Over 10,000
Base /Qtr
Over 3,000
Base /Mo
Revenue
Revenue
Current Rates 3.87
62.36
3.87
20.79
1,314,751
-
Scenario 1 3.95
63.61
3.95
21.21
1,341,046
26,295.00
(2% incr tier, 2% incr. base)
Scenario 2 4.06
65.48
4.06
21.83
1,380,488
65,737.00
(5% incr tier, 5% incr. base)
Scenario 3 4.14
66.73
4.14
22.25
1,406,783
92,032.00
(7% incr tier, 7% incr. base)
Scenario 4 4.26
68.60
4.26
22.87
1,446,226
131,475.00
(10% incr tier, 10% incr. base)
Scenario 5 4.33
69.84
4.33
23.28
1,472,521
157,770.00
(12% incr tier, 12% incr. base)
9
Scenario 6 4.45 71.71 4145 23.91 1,511,963 197,212.00
(15% incr tier,15 %incr. base)
Scenario 7 4.64 74.83
(20% incr tier, 20% incr. base)
Scenario 8 4.84 77.95
(25% incr tier, 25% incr. base)
4.64 24.95
4.84 25.99
1,577,701 262,950.00
1,643,438 328,687.00
Assumptions /Information
2010 actual usage is down about 8 -9%
Decreased 2008 -2009 usage for 25k+ accts by 20% (10% for 2010 and 10% for 2011)
With every 1% per qtr base rates are raised an additional $9,299 revenue is created
With every 1% per gal (over the base rate) is raised an additional $3,848 revenue is created
s
S: \FINANCE DEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTS \Department Analysis \UTILITY ANALYSIS & WATER RATE STUDY\Rate
Scenarios 2011
-67-
City of Mound
Storm Water Rate Scenarios 2011
Scenario 4 20.00 3,593 287,440.00 $3,856.00 341,296 114,976.00
(incr 67% qtrly fee)
Scenario 5 22.00
(incr 83% qtrly fee)
Scenario 6 24.00
(incr 100% qtrly fee)
Scenario 7 26.00
(incr 117% qtrly fee)
370,040 143,720.00
398,7841 172,464.00
427,528
•
201,208.00 •'
3,593 316,184.00 53,856.00
3,593 344,928.00 53,856.00
3,593 373,672.00 53,856.00
Assumptions /Information
With every $1 p mo nth storm water fee is increased an additional $14,372 revenue is created
Commercial accounts are currently billed $4,488 in total for storm water each month.
0
S: \FINANCE DEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTS \Department Analysis \UTILITY ANALYSIS & WATER RATE STUDY \Rate Scenarios
2011
-68-
Number of
Residential
Commercial
Total Projected
Increase in
Fee /Qtr
Households
Revenue
Revenue
Revenue
Revenue
Current Rates
12.00
3,593
172,464.00
53,856.00
226,320
-
Scenario 1
14.00
3,593
201,208.00
53,856.00
255,064
28,744.00
(incr 17% qtrly fee)
Scenario 2
16.00
3,593
229,952.00
53,856.00
283,808
57,488.00
(incr 33% qtrly fee)
Scenario 3
18.00
3,593
258,696.00
53,856.00
312,552
86,232.00
(incr 50% qtrly fee)
Scenario 4 20.00 3,593 287,440.00 $3,856.00 341,296 114,976.00
(incr 67% qtrly fee)
Scenario 5 22.00
(incr 83% qtrly fee)
Scenario 6 24.00
(incr 100% qtrly fee)
Scenario 7 26.00
(incr 117% qtrly fee)
370,040 143,720.00
398,7841 172,464.00
427,528
•
201,208.00 •'
3,593 316,184.00 53,856.00
3,593 344,928.00 53,856.00
3,593 373,672.00 53,856.00
Assumptions /Information
With every $1 p mo nth storm water fee is increased an additional $14,372 revenue is created
Commercial accounts are currently billed $4,488 in total for storm water each month.
0
S: \FINANCE DEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTS \Department Analysis \UTILITY ANALYSIS & WATER RATE STUDY \Rate Scenarios
2011
-68-
•
Monthly
Grand
Total
58.61
45.16
60.85
60.85
47.11
65.02
55.96
65.33
26.90
32.10
51.00
54.23
54.36
Incr.
52.11
77.42+ -3 �o
p.rer
dDtO
0
0
City of Mound
-
Utility
Bills Comparison
MONTHLY AVERAGE - based on
water use of 15,000
gallons per Quarter or 5,000 per
month
Water
Water
Total
Sewer
Sewer
Total
Storm
city
Base Rate
Over Base
Water
Base
Over Base
Sewer
Recycling
Water
Mound
5.00
17.55
22.55
20.79
7.02
27.81
4.25
4.00
Columbia Hghts
6.61
15.85
22.46
6.08
9.90
15.98
3.87
2.85
2
Orono (A1)
8.00
10.75
18.75
36.58
N/A
36.58
2.08
3.43
0
1
Orono (A2)
8.00
10.75
18.75
36.58
N/A
36.58
2.08
3.43
0
Victoria
8.29
13.25
21.54
9.90
10.00
19.90
1.67
4.00
A
C
Medina
9.00
12.25
21.25
18.48
23.10
41.58
N/A
2.19
T
Minnetrista
6.50
14.95
21.45
28.34
N/A
28.34
3.17
3.00
U
A
Hamel
12.50
11.25
23.75
18.48
23.10
41.58
N/A
N/A
L
Farmington
4.00
5.50
9.50
9.00
5.40
14.40
N/A
3.00
R
Minnetonka
0.00
9.00
9.00
15.50
0.00
15.50
2.50
5.10
A
T
Spring Park
4.00
16.25
20.25
2.50
28.25
30.75
N/A
N/A
E
S
Golden Valley
6.00
20.90
26.90
17.33
N/A
17.33
2.67
7.33
(a1 Credit for ACH)
Waverly
12.00
50.00
62.00
10.75
57.50
68.25
1.00
Watertown
14.50
10.76
25.26
8.00
18.60
26.60
N/A
2.50
Mid Point (CURRENT 2009 RATES):
23.10
30.08
1.66
3.14
Proposed 2011 Rates
12.00
23.18
35.18
23.90
7.42
31.32
4.25
6.67
•
Monthly
Grand
Total
58.61
45.16
60.85
60.85
47.11
65.02
55.96
65.33
26.90
32.10
51.00
54.23
54.36
Incr.
52.11
77.42+ -3 �o
p.rer
dDtO
ity of Mound
`iquor Fund History and Long Term Forecas
Funds Available /Debt Service
Transfers Out /Available for Other Uses
Key Operatine Ratios
Inventory Turnover
(COGS /Inventory)
Days Sales in Inventory
(365 /(COGS /Inventory))
Inventory as a Percentage of Sales
(Inventory/Sales)
Operating Expense as a Percentage of
(Operating Expense /Sales)
Part Time Payroll as a Percentage of G
(PT Payroll /Gross Profit)
190.22% 52.11% - 47.86% - 20.21%
230,988 172,066 60,407 (51,389) (155,330) (123,582)
10.17
12.38
10.12
5.24
4.44
4.82
35.88
•
Year Ending
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
14.65%
17.72%
16.37%
15.17%
17.73%
19.54%
23.26%
26.00%
Inventory (12/31/xx)
138,251
115,900
142,201
307,518
331,761
349,582
Change in Inventory
17.21%
- 16.17%
22.69%
116.26%
7.88%
5.37%
Sales
1,861,914
1,899,857
1,881,175
2,099,734
1,872,304
2,134,980
Sales % Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
5.98%
2.04%
-0.98%
11.62%
- 10.83%
14.03%
Cost of Sales
(1,406,548)
(1,434,850)
(1,438,619)
(1,612,498)
(1,474,015)
(1,685,952)
Gross Profit
455,366
465,007
442,556
487,236
398,289
449,028
Gross Profit Percentage
24.46%
24.48%
23.53%
23.20%
21.27%
21.03%
Operating Revenue
455,366
465,007
442,556
487,236
398,289
449,028
Operating Expense
(282,530)
(336,877)
(367,505)
(488,481)
(486,859)
(508,100)
Operating Income
172,836
128,130
75,051
(1,245)
(88,570)
(59,072)
Rent
30,287
32,515
48,173
-
-
-
Depreciation
996
1,316
4,134
57,159
38,293
38,293
Nonoperating Income (Expense)
26,869
10,105
-
-
-
-
Funds Available for Debt Service
230,988
172,066
127,358
55,914
(50,277)
(20,779)
�ebt Service /Interfund Loan
-
-
(66,951)
(107,303)
(105,053)
(102,803)
Coverage Ratio
•
Funds Available /Debt Service
Transfers Out /Available for Other Uses
Key Operatine Ratios
Inventory Turnover
(COGS /Inventory)
Days Sales in Inventory
(365 /(COGS /Inventory))
Inventory as a Percentage of Sales
(Inventory/Sales)
Operating Expense as a Percentage of
(Operating Expense /Sales)
Part Time Payroll as a Percentage of G
(PT Payroll /Gross Profit)
190.22% 52.11% - 47.86% - 20.21%
230,988 172,066 60,407 (51,389) (155,330) (123,582)
10.17
12.38
10.12
5.24
4.44
4.82
35.88
29.48
36.08
69.61
82.15
75.68
7.43%
6.10%
7.56%
14.65%
17.72%
16.37%
15.17%
17.73%
19.54%
23.26%
26.00%
23.80%
50,141
57,430
45,832
42,460
11.33%
11.79%
11.51%
9.46%
0
-70-
�ity of Mound
Aquor Fund History and Long Term Forecas
Coverage Ratio
Funds Available /Debt Service
Transfers Out /Available for Other Uses
Key Operatina Ratios
Inventory Turnover
(COGS /Inventory)
Days Sales in Inventory
(365 /(COG S /Inventory))
Inventory as a Percentage of Sales
(Inventory/Sales)
Operating Expense as a Percentage of
(Operating Expense /Sales)
Part Time Payroll as a Percentage of G
(PT Payroll /Gross Profit)
79.48% 199.98% 151.75% 164.59% 161.12% 141.84%
(21,637) 107,785 54,367 69,230 63,653 50,248
4.21
3.46
3.18
3.90
5.16
7.00
86.65
Year Ending
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
23.84%
19.17%
14.53%
10.71%
22.08%
19.53%
Inventory (12/31/xx)
413,121
536,421
642,884
527,333
400,000
300,000
Change in Inventory
18.18%
29.85%
19.85%
- 17.97%
- 24.15%
- 25.00%
Sales
2,291,715
2,525,958
2,696,659
2,751,455
2,752,000
2,800,000
Sales % Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
7.34%
10.22%
6.76%
2.03%
0.02%
1.74%
Cost of Sales
(1,740,257)
(1,855,328)
(2,042,183)
(2,057,481)
(2,064,000)
(2,100,000)
Gross Profit
551,458
670,630
654,476
693,974
688,000
700,000
Gross Profit Percentage
24.06%
26 55%
24.27%
25.22%
25.00%
25.00%
Operating Revenue
551,458
670,630
654,476
693,974
688,000
700,000
Operating Expense
(505,960)
(493,336)
(532,789)
(552,880)
(555,513)
(564,957)
Operating Income
45,498
177,294
121,687
141,094
132,487
135,043
Rent
-
-
-
-
-
Depreciation
38,293
38,293
37,732
35,313
35,313
35,313
Nonoperating Income (Expense)
-
-
-
-
-
-
Funds Available for Debt Service
83,791
215,587
159,419
176,407
167,800
170,356
�ebt Service /Interfund Loan
(105,428)
(107,803)
(105,053)
(107,178)
(104,148)
(120,109)
Coverage Ratio
Funds Available /Debt Service
Transfers Out /Available for Other Uses
Key Operatina Ratios
Inventory Turnover
(COGS /Inventory)
Days Sales in Inventory
(365 /(COG S /Inventory))
Inventory as a Percentage of Sales
(Inventory/Sales)
Operating Expense as a Percentage of
(Operating Expense /Sales)
Part Time Payroll as a Percentage of G
(PT Payroll /Gross Profit)
79.48% 199.98% 151.75% 164.59% 161.12% 141.84%
(21,637) 107,785 54,367 69,230 63,653 50,248
4.21
3.46
3.18
3.90
5.16
7.00
86.65
105.53
114.90
93.55
70.74
52.14
18.03%
21.24%
23.84%
19.17%
14.53%
10.71%
22.08%
19.53%
19.76%
20.09%
20.19%
20.18%
55,669
65,615
76,827
89,537
93,000
75,000
10.09%
9.78%
11.74%
12.90%
13.52%
10.71%
-71-
-pity of Mound
iquor Fund History and Long Term Forecas (Operating Revenue +1.7% per year/
_72_
Expenses +1.7% per year 2011- 2015)
Year Ending
2012
2013
2014
2015
Inventory (12 /31 /xx)
300,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
Change in Inventory
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Sales
2,850,000
2,900,000
2,950,000
3,000,000
Sales % Increase (Decrease)
from Prior Year
1.79%
1.75%
1.72%
1.69%
Cost of Sales
(2,137,500)
(2,175,000)
(2,212,500)
(2,250,000)
Gross Profit
712,500
725,000
737,500
750,000
Gross Profit Percentage
25.00%
25.00%
25.00%
25.00%
Operating Revenue
712,500
725,000
737,500
750,000
Operating Expense
(574,561)
(584,329)
(594,262)
(604,365)
Operating Income
137,939
140,671
143,238
145,635
Rent
Depreciation
35,313
35,313
35,313
35,313
Nonoperating Income (Expense)
-
-
-
-
Funds Available for Debt Service
173,252
175,984
178,551
180,948
�ebt Service /Interfund Loan
(119,800)
(119,800)
(119,800)
(119,800)
Coverage Ratio
Funds Available /Debt Service
144.62%
146.90%
149.04%
151.04%
Transfers Out /Available for Other Uses
53,452
56,184
58,751
61,148
Key Operatine Ratios
Inventory Turnover
(COGS /Inventory)
7.13
7.25
7.38
7.50
Days Sales in Inventory
(365 /(COGS /Inventory))
51.23
50.34
49.49
48.67
Inventory as a Percentage of Sales
(Inventory/Sales)
10.53%
10.34%
10.17%
10.00%
Operating Expense as a Percentage of
(Operating Expense /Sales)
20.16%
20.15%
20.14%
20.15%
Part Time Payroll as a Percentage of G
76,275
77,572
78,890
80,232
(PT Payroll /Gross Profit)
10.71%
10.70%
10.70%
10.70%
•
_72_
C]
•
City of Mound
Liquor Fund Interfun.d Loan Calculation
Bond Principal Balance 2/1/11
Negative Cash Proiected
Interfund Loan Amount
Principal as of 3/1/11
Interest Rate (10 YR T -Bill 2.66%)
Term (Years)
Annual Payment
740,000
300.000
1,040,000
Annual Payments
1,040,000
0.0266
10
($119,813.66)
2011 -10 months
1,040,000
0.002216667
120
($9,879.92)
10
($98,799.20)
-73-
77.)U
PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST PAYMENT SCHEDULE
City of Mound, Minnesota
$1,156,000 Municipal Liquor Store Revenue Bonds, Series 20018
a
0 qq
CUSIP No.
Payment Total Total Base:
Date PrinciRal Rate Interest Notations P&I Any 620569
07/11101
0,2/011 535,237.50 _ $� $35.237-50
PA/0 02
LQ1/02
1_�_ 713 .75
/01/0 6-6) _ 31
02/01/03 4iO 0 5.00 31,
08/01/03 7�.75 — *-'*' —
_30 76,713.75 108,427.50 AAj
.5_8875 30,588-75,
02/04 45.00 5.00 30,588.75 76,588.75 106,177-50 AB9
08/01/04 29,463.75 29,463.75
02/01/05 45, 000 5.00 29,463.75 74,463.75 103,927.50 AC7
08/01/05
02/01/06 50,000 5.00 28,338.75 78.338.75 106,677.50 ADS
08/01/06 27,088.75
02/01/07 55000 _qq
08 25,713,75
02/01/08 55,000 5.66 25,713.75 80,713.76 106,427.50 AFO
08101/08 24,338.75 24,338.75
62id
84.338.75 108,677-50 AGS
08/01/09 22,838.75'*--'-' 22,838.75
.08/01/10 21,308-75 21,308.75 105,677-50 ANG
02/01/11
65,000 5.25 21,308.75 86.308.75 107,617.50 AJ2
08/01/11 19,602.50 19,602.50
02/01/12 70,000 5.40 19,602.50 89,602.50 109.205,00 AK9
08/01/12 17,712.50 17,712.50
02/01/13 75,000 5.50 17,712.50 92,712.50 110.425.00 AL7
08/01/13 15,650.00 15,650.00
02/01/14 76,000 5.60 15,650-00 90,650.00 10 6,300-00 AMS
08101114 13,550.00 13,550.00
02/01/15 80,000 5.75 13,550.00 93.550.00 107,100.00 AN3
08/01/15 11,250.00 11,260.00
02/01/16 85,000 6.00 11,250.00 96,250.00 107.500.00
08/01/16 8,700.00 8,700.00
02/01/17 90,000 6.00 8,700.00 98,700.00 107.400.00
08/01117 6,000.00 6,000.00
02101/18 95,000 6.00 6,000 101,000.00 107,000.00
08/01/18 3,150.00 -- - -- - - 3,150.00
02/01/19 105,000 6.00 3,150.00 108,150.00 111,300.00 AS2
$70 1 9 1-11-
265.00
S1,8�;�255. $1,664,255.00
Note: ' Bonds maturing in 2019 are Term Bonds and, therefore, Mandatory Call
Notices must be published by the Paying Agent for each of the maturities noted above
with the ••,
Prepared by Ehlers and Associates
0
(M. 123)
06/20101
-74-
•
Ai
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
TAX LEVIES
CITY OF MOUND
TAX LEVY HISTORY AND PROJECTIONS
= = => project 2% increase to General Fund Levy, 3% Fire Relief
2008
2009 2010
•
Ai
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
TAX LEVIES
= = => project 2% increase to General Fund Levy, 3% Fire Relief
REVENUE - GENERAL FUND
3,586,501
3,726,374
3,726,374
3,726,374
3,800,902
3,876,920
3,954,458
4,033,547
,
4
REVENUE -LEASE PAYMENTS
366,860
366,860
392,789
392,789
392,789
392,789
380,000
380,000
FIRE RELIEF
72,120
74,404
76,030
78,311
80,660
83,080
85,572
88,140
_
G.O. DEBT SERVICE LEVIES
902.570
1.005.949
1.106,660
1.209.999
1.431.438
1.519.353
1.658,831
1.641.653
See sheet
TOTAL SPECIAL LEVIES
1.341,550
1.447.213
1.575.479
1.681,099
1.904.887
1.995.222
2.124.403
2.109.793
TOTAL LEVY
4.928.051
5.173.587
5.36.8
5.705:789
5.872.'(42
G:Q78.861
6.143.340
% Increase in Total Levy
5.19%
4.98%
2.48%
1.99%
5.52%
2.92%
3.52%
1.06%
dP
Jo b
Less Fiscal Disparity Recd
- 321,170
- 345,286
- 345,717
- 360,618
- 360,618
- 360,618
- 360,618
- 360,618
NET LEVY
4,606,881
4,828,301
4,956,136
5,046,855
5,345,171
5,511,524
5,718,243
5,782,722
Tax Capacity
13,956,284
14,687,788
14,016,474
12,684,248
12,684,248
12,684,248
12,684,248
12,684,248
% Change in Tax Cap
9.78%
5.24 %
-4.57%
-9.50%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Less Fiscal Disparity Contrib
- 237,614
- 237,614
- 237,614
- 263,339
- 263,339
- 263,339
- 263,339
- 263,339
Less TIF Received
- 485, 533
- 485, 533
- 485, 533
- 443, 093
- 443,093
- 443,093
- 443,093
- 443,093
Net Tax Capacity (per HC)
13,233,137
13,964,641
13,293,327
11,977,816
11,977,816
11,977,816
11,977,816
11,977,816
Tax Rate
34.816%
34.579%
37.287%
45.146%
47.636%
49.025%
50.751%
51.289%
SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT
HRA Levy (Deck 1 debt svc & maint)
190. 418
244.654
24 3.932
244.447
244,407
244,407
244,442
244.407
i i•\r•o� ,�, ►,o\ne„ rinr imonlcN7Z \I1AQndnnH9n1
\R Innf lllln.l.c6nne In.ni
4 1 nnnnin
CITY OF MOUND
SPECIAL LEVIES / DEBT LEVIES
A
A Z..
2016
36,000
325,000
85,000
62,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
Levy for $1 M, 15 YR, 3% bonds, 50% Special Assessed
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
1,374,370
45,000
151,120
380,000
90,784
2,077,274
-2%
(32,519)
2017
0
325,000
85,000
25% prepaid, rest assessed at 5%
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
1,374,370
45,000
138,535
380,000
93,507
2,031,412
-2%
(45,861)
YR 2 -15 $45K, Yr 16 $25K
0
325,000
85,000
62,000
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
128,205
Total
$x.xxM
$1.765M
$1.6M
$2.725M
$1.675M
$3.94M
$3.632M $2.849M $3.297M $.354M $.454M
Total
$2.3M
$4.1M
Pub Sfty
0
300,000
85,000
62,000
150,000
Equip
2011 Ref
2005 GO
2006 GO
2007 GO
2008 GO
2009 GO
2011 GO 2012 GO 2013 GO 2014 GO 2015 GO
GO
2003C
2009D GO TIF
Lease
Fire
-2%
(37,399)
2020
0
Certificates
Bonds
Impr
Impr
Impr
Impr
Impr
Impr Impr Impr Impr Impr
Improv
GO Tax Incr
Dump Bonds
Payments
Relief
98,993
380,000
102,178
1,922,541
2005 -2011
(88,170)
2021
0
225,000
0
62,000
150,000
2001 -2011
235,000
163,440
128,205
+3% per
15,930
20,430
1,211,370
rllect Yr
87,205
Fd 3xx
Fd 368
Fd 369
Fd 361
Fd 362
Fd 363
Fd 3XX Fd 3XX Fd 3XX Fd 3XX Fd 3XX
100,000
Fd 355
0
Fd 101
Fd 101
Total
$ Ina
2008
292,369
232,362
65,100
29,252
116,270
0
0
0 0 0 0 0
442,984
146,717
0
366,860
72,120
1,321,050
r90%/6
0
2009
216,873
251,554
72,100
31,520
116,385
150,700
0
0 0 0 0 0
622,259
146,717
0
366,860
74,404
1,427,113
2024
106,063
2010
295,716
255,000
70,000
58,000
128,000
63,000
172,344
0 0 0 0 0
746,344
45,000
0
392,789
76,030
1,555,879
115,002
128,766
2011
165,450
419,200
75,000
58,000
128,000
63,000
136,000
0 0 0 0 0
879,200
45,000
120,349
392,789
78,311
1,681,099
8%
125,220
2012
140,950
388,000
85,000
58,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440 0 0 0 0
1,120,440
45,000
125,048
392,789
80,660
1,904,887
13%
223,788
2013
98,100
388,000
85,000
58,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440 128,205 0 0 0
1,248,645
45,000
127,608
392,789
83,080
1,995,222
5%
90,335
2014
97,050
350,000
85,000
58,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440 128,205 148,365 0 0
1,359,010
45,000
157,771
380,000
85,572
2,124,403
6%
129,181
2016
36,000
325,000
85,000
62,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
1,374,370
45,000
151,120
380,000
90,784
2,077,274
-2%
(32,519)
2017
0
325,000
85,000
62,000
128,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
1,374,370
45,000
138,535
380,000
93,507
2,031,412
-2%
(45,861)
2018
0
325,000
85,000
62,000
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
1,396,370
45,000
130,427
380,000
96,313
2,048,110
1%
16,697
2019
0
300,000
85,000
62,000
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
1,371,370
45,000
115,139
380,000
99,202
2,010,711
-2%
(37,399)
2020
0
225,000
85,000
62,000
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
1,296,370
45,000
98,993
380,000
102,178
1,922,541
4%
(88,170)
2021
0
225,000
0
62,000
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
1,211,370
45,000
87,205
380,000
105,243
1,828,818
-5%
(93,723)
2022
0
100,000
0
0
150,000
63,000
235,000
163,440
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
1,024,370
45,000
74,281
380,000
108,401
1,632,052
-11%
(196,767)
2023
0
75,000
0
0
0
56,000
235,000
163,440
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
842,370
0
65,436
380,000
111,653
1,399,459
-14%
(232,593)
2024
0
0
0
0
0
0
235,000
163,440
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
711,370
0
65,673
115,002
892,045
-36%
(507,413)
2025
0
0
0
0
0
0
245,000
163,440
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
721,370
0
43,031
764,401
-14%
(127,644)
2026
0
0
0
0
0
0
90,800
128,205
148,365
15,930
20,430
403,730
0
0
403,730
-47%
(360,671)
2027
0
0
0
0
0
0
71,225
148,365
15,930
20,430
255,950
0
255,950
-37%
(147,780)
1 o ) t jv. -k� psut�-f l:.Pi✓"l . �11551t Wl� OL-
ee-+ Y-� l rGtn. I . n ► I V"
V
4
r
ell
1 �
® p.
C ~4..
r
0 0 0
5 -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP): 2011 -2015
STREETS
ANNUAL STREET RECON PROJECTS: STREET COSTS ONLY
(Includes 30% Indirect Cost and Deduct for Utility Street Replacement Cost)
A -:3
s I °l b
b/b MSA Va r , e5 dam- - tD "' dl'L. a S+,f -- cis .
Special Assessments
$1,118,429
West Tonkawood
City (1/3), Bonds
$559,215
Special Assessments
$657,865
Island View Drive
City (1/3), Bonds
$328,932
Special Assessments
$1,721,000
SW Island Park Area
City (1/3), Bonds
$861,000
Special Assessment
$283,700
City (1/3), Bonds
$141,900
Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland
MSA Fund
$201,500
32 0 10
Special Assessments
$1,507,400
N. Island Park Area
City (1/3),, Bonds
$753,700
Special Assessments
$1,397,000
SE Island Park Area
City (1/3), Bonds
$698,500
S.A. ($59.4k City Prcls)
$225,100
City (1/3), Bonds
$112,500
Lynwood Blvd. /Fairview Ln.
MSA Fund
$173,200
Special Assessment
$416,000
City (1/3), Bonds
$208,500
Three Points Blvd.
MSA Fund
$414,700
G °7
Special Assessment
$289,200
City (1/3), Bonds
$144,600
Bartlett Blvd, Wilshire - Shoreline
MSA Fund
$519,300
TOTAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
$1,776,294
$2,004,700
$1,507,400
$1,813,000
$225,100
$289,200
TOTAL BOND, (COULD BE MSA)
$888,147
$1,002,900
$753,700
$907,000
$112,500
$144,600
TOTAL MSA
$201,500
$414,700
$173,200
$519,300
GRAND TOTAL
1
1 $2,664,4411
1 $3,209,1001
$2,261,1001
$3,134,700
$510,800
$953,100
s I °l b
b/b MSA Va r , e5 dam- - tD "' dl'L. a S+,f -- cis .
5 -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP): 2011 -2015
RETAINING WALLS
ANNUAL RETAINING WALL RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
(Includes 30% Indirect Cost)
Aq
?"k � R �P? • k .kn6
West Tonkawood Neighborhood
.�r
Retaining Wall Fund
$175,804
�. ,� 6�
fi:F �"Y
�E+",��`s.�nd
C`e .
Island View Drive
Retaining Wall Fund
$60,501
SW Island Park Area
Retaining Wall Fund
$605,200
Ridgewood Rd. /ldlewood Rd. /Highland Blvd.
Retaining Wall Fund
$19,700
N. Island Park Area
Retaining Wall Fund
$587,900
Lynwood Blvd. /Fairview Ln.
Retaining Wall Fund
$16,200
SE Island Park Area
Retaining Wall Fund
$544,800
Three Points Blvd.
Retaining Wall Fund
$32,600
Bartlett Blvd, Wilshire to Shoreline
Retaining Wall Fund
1
$19,700
I TOTALS
1 $236,3051
1 $624,900
$587,900
$577,400
$16,200
$19,700
• • •
2-
b City of Mound
Utility Funds - 2010 Budget
•
Total Water Sewer Storm
Total Revenues 2,868,738 1,200,000 1,439,250 229,488
Total Salaries & Benefits 826,862 375,316 396,103 55,443
Total Supplies 136,150 85,850 44,800 5,500
Total Cost of Goods Sold 0 0 0 0
Total Professional Services 161,226 71,510 39,447 50,269
Total Phone, Postage & Print 26,100 13,300 12,700 100
Total Insurance 32,589 16,927 15,662 0
Total Utilities 663,175 55,000 608,175 0
Total Repairs & Maint 65,500 48,000 17,500 0
Total Other Contracts & Rental 71,500 26,000 25,500 20,000
Total Deprec & Capital Exp 1,019,000 555,000 354,000 110,000
Total Debt Service 673,100 443,700 124,700 104,700
Total Misc, Interest & Other 14,800 8,000 6,800 0
Total Transfers 0 0 0 0
Total Expenditures 3,690,002 1,698,603 1,645,387 346,012
• Incr(Decr) Net Assets - 821,264 - 498,603 - 206,137 - 116,524
Total Exp Less Depr & Debt Svc 1,997,902 699,903 1,166,687 131,312
Add Debt Service Per Schedules 1,154,053 809,266 169,799 174,988
Add additional MCES 86,000 0 86,000 0
Adjusted Total Expenditures 3,237,955 1,509,169 1,422,486 306,300
Incr(Decr) Net Assets - 369,217 - 309,169 16,764 - 76,812
Incremental Debt Service Per Year
2011
161,268
81,081
52,623
27,564
2012
216,304
68,909
71,571
75,824
2013
131,363
15,894
89,645
25,824
2014
226,941
103,801
75,008
48,132
2015
138,832
39,903
87,454
11,475
Total Additional Debt Svc 2011- 2015
2,658,359
976,228
1,055,804
626,327
S: \FINANCE DEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTS \Department Analysis \UTILITY ANALYSIS & WATER RATE
STUDY \2010 Utility Fund Budgets
■L -1
Warr C I F
K
- . .
s
•
go
f�
Jr' 7
7
Ir-
N
S -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP): 2011 -201S
WATER FUND PROJECT COSTS
ANNUAL REPLACEMENT AS NEEDED WITH ANNUAL STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT
(Includes 30% Indirect Cost and Street Replacement Cost)
•
CITY OF MOUND
UTILITY DEBT SCHEDULE
i s
Wakr Lib+ Syce 0
Fund $: 5
570,000 9
978,250 9
935,000 3
3,325,000 9
930,000 8
824,250 1
1,885,000 2
2,580,600 1
1,052,400 1
196,000 1
1,557,600 5
584,400 5
583,100 T
Total
- - - -> W
Water
2001A 2
2003B 2
2004B 2
2005B 2
2006B 2
2007B 2
2008C 2
2009B 2
2011 est 2
2012 est 2
2013 est 2
2014 est 2
2015 est R
Rev Bonds
2001 -201,
Assumption: 3.5 %, 20 year bonds
For every $1 M, $71,000 per year debt service
M
W
S: \FINANCE DEP RBONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTSM30ND ISSUESIUTILITY REVENUE BONDS \Utility Debt Schedule OFFICIAL
City of Mound
Water Rate Scenarios 2011
Total Projected Increase in
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Base /Qtr Revenue Revenue
Current Rates 3.51 4.04 4.64 15.00 1,201,722 -
Scenario 1 3.51 4.04 4.64 27.00 1,375,586 173,864.00
(0% incr tier, 80% incr. base)
Scenario 2 3.69 4.24 4.87 27.00 1,424,118 222,396.00
(5% incr tier, 80% incr. base)
Scenario 3 3.86 4.44 5.10 27.00 1,468,729 267,007.00
(10% incr tier, 80% incr. base)
Scenario 4 3.86 4.44 5.10 33.00 1,558,201 356,479.00
(10% incr tier, 120% incr. base)
61
Scenario 5
4.04
4.65
5.34
36.00
1,649,851
448,129.00
(15% incr tier,
140% incr. base)
Scenario 6
4.21
4.85
5.57
36.00
1,694,462
492,740.00 .
(20% incr tier,
140% incr. base)
Scenario 7
4.39
5.05
5.80
39.00
1,784,490
582,768.00
(25% incr tier,
160% incr. base)
Scenario 8
4.56
5.25
6.03
42.00
1,873,837
672,115.00
(30% incr tier,
180% incr. base)
Assumptions /Information
2010 actual usage is down about 8 -9%
Decreased 2008 -2009 usage for 25k+ accts by 20% (10% for 2010 and 10% for 2011)
With every .25 increase to each tier an additional $57,590 revenue is created
With every $1 p er month base rates are raised an additional $44,736 revenue is created
Prelim 2011 Budgeted expense for the Water Fund is $ 1,579,357
*I
\ \Moundserver \shareddata \FINANCE DEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTS \Department Analysis \UTILITY ANALYSIS
& WATER RATE STUDY \Rate Scenarios 2011.xisx
Sew
5 -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP): 2011 -2015
SEWER FUND PROJECT COSTS
ANNUAL: LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT PROGRAM; PIPE LINING & MH CHIMNEY SEALING
(Includes 30% Indirect Cost and Street Replacement Cost)
x r
�• �� tom. ��. �� � � � . -
nn 39
m � �:�
�
x
LS D -1 (Spruce Rd. & Waterside Ln.)
Sewer Fund
$200,000
LS L -1 (Island View Dr. & Devon Ln.)
Sewer Fund
$285,000
LS 1 -1 (Island View Dr. & Aberdeen Rd.)
Sewer Fund
$225,000
Street Restoration, Sewer Trench
Sewer Fund
$20,922
LS E- 3(Emerald Dr. &Wilshire Blvd.)
Sewer Fund
$385,000
LS D-4 (Northern Rd. E. of Edgewater Dr.)
Sewer Fund
$375,000
LS E -2 (Bartlett & Fernside)
Sewer fund
$355,000
LS B -1 (Highland Blvd. S. of Fairfield)
Sewer Fund
$365,000
LS B -2 (Highland Blvd. S. of Idlewood Rd.)
Sewer Fund
$350,000
LS N -1 (Waterbury Rd. & Gladstone Ln.)
Sewer Fund
$300,000
LS C -5 (Commerce Blvd. S. of Three Points Blvd.)
Sewer Fund
$350,000
LS C -6 (Shorewood Ln. & Beachside Rd.)
Sewer Fund
$350,000
LS A -1 (Clover Circle & Red Oak Rd.)
Sewer Fund
$350,000
LS C -1 (Three Pts. Blvd. & Glen Elyn Rd.)
Sewer Fund
$350,000
LS C -2 (Sumach Ln. & Sparrow Rd.)
Sewer Fund
$300,000
LS C -4 (Woodland Rd. & Dove Ln.)
Sewer Fund
$325,000
LS A -2 (Grandview Blvd. N. of Sunset Rd.)
Sewer Fund
$325,000
LS D -2 (Lynwood Blvd. E. of Cardinal Ln.)
Sewer Fund
$350,000
LS F -1 ( Wilshire Blvd. E. of Tuxedo Blvd.)
Sewer Fund
$400,000
LS A -3 (Sunset Rd. & Sycamore Ln.)
Sewer Fund
$250,000
3 Lift Station Replacements TBD
Sewer Fund
$1,000,000
Chimney Seals & CIPP & Repair
Sewer Fund
$103,500
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
TOTALS
$834,422
$1,630,000
$1,100,000
$1,075,000
$1,225,000
$1,150,000
CITY OF
UTILITY
S Nrr D44 Sye...,
IThru 2033 0 135,020 193,105 0 149,157 1,691,512 0 2,513,832 1 493 840 1,704,000 1 52 500 1,652,525 1,469,700 1 12,529,190
S: \FINWEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTS \BOND ISSUES \UTILITY REVENUE BONDS\UWbt Schedule OFFICIAL •
SEWER FUND BONDS
Fund 5:
-
376,750
150,000
-
103,416
1,130,400
-
1,695,100
1,100,000
1,200,000
1,075,000
1,225,000
1,150,000
Total
Sewer
2001A
2003B
2004B
2005B
2006B
2007B
2008C
2009B
2011 est
2012 est
2013 est
2014 est
2015 est
Rev Bonds
2001 -2015
Pay Year
2008
0
68,244
10,663
0
7,807
44,598
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
131,312
2009
0
66,776
10,488
0
7,676
82,278
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
167,217
2010
0
0
10,300
0
7,543
80,838
0
71,118
0
0
0
0
0
169,799
2011
0
0
10,100
0
7,817
81,753
0
122,752
0
0
0
0
0
222,422
2012
0
0
9,900
0
7,665
80,223
0
121,513
74,692
0
0
0
0
293,993
2013
0
0
9,698
0
7,920
81,048
0
125,081
74,692
85,200
0
0
0
383,638
2014
0
0
9,493
0
7,748
81,783
0
123,406
74,692
85,200
76,325
0
0
458,646
2015
0
0
9,285
0
7,982
82,428
0
123,213
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
0
546,100
2016
0
0
9,075
0
7,790
80,628
0
122,803
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
81,650
625,137
2017
0
0
8,860
0
8,002
81,120
0
122,252
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
81,650
625,076
2018
0
0
13,530
0
7,785
81,456
0
121,559
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
81,650
629,172
2019
0
0
13,078
0
7,974
81,696
0
122,363
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
81,650
629,953
2020
0
0
12,613
0
7,735
81,840
0
122,757
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
81,650
629,786
2021
0
0
12,148
0
7,902
81,888
0
121,182
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
81,650
627,962
2022
0
0
11,680
0
8,051
81,840
0
121,182
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
81,650
627,595
2023
0
0
11,210
0
7,771
84,048
0
121,048
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
81,650
628,919
2024
0
0
10,738
0
7,895
83,712
0
122,422
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
81,650
629,608
2025
0
0
10,250
0
8,002
83,280
0
121,953
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
81,650
628,327
2026
0
0
0
0
8,091
85,066
0
121,299
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
81,650
619,298
2027
0
0
0
0
0
84,268
0
122,088
74,692
85,200
76,325
86,975
81,650
611,197
IThru 2033 0 135,020 193,105 0 149,157 1,691,512 0 2,513,832 1 493 840 1,704,000 1 52 500 1,652,525 1,469,700 1 12,529,190
S: \FINWEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTS \BOND ISSUES \UTILITY REVENUE BONDS\UWbt Schedule OFFICIAL •
- 87
V1 City of Mound
V Sewer Rate Scenarios 2011
Residential Commercial Total Projected Increase in
C* Over 10,000 Base /Qtr Over 3,000 Base /Mo Revenue Revenue
Current Rates 3.87 62.36 3.87 20.79 1,387,775 -
3 Scenario 1 3.95 63.61 3.95 21.21 1,414,069 26,294.00
'\/]�� Y (2% incr tier, 2% incr. base)
Scenario 2 4.06 65.48 4.06 21.83 1,543,510 155,735.00
(5% incr tier, 5% incr. base)
Scenario 3 4.14 66.73 4.14 22.25 1,479,804 92,029.00
(7% incr tier, 7% incr. base)
Scenario 4 4.26 68.60 4.26 22.87 1,519,245 131,470.00
(10% incr tier, 10% incr. base)
Scenario 5 4.33 69.84 4.33 23.28 1,545,539 157,764.00
(12% incr tier, 12% incr. base)
• Scenario 6 4.45 71.71 4.45 23.91 1,584,980 197,205.00
(15% incr tier, 15% incr. base)
Scenario 7 4.64 74.83 4.64 24.95 1,650,715 262,940.00
(20% incr tier, 20% incr. base)
Scenario 8 4.84 77.95 4.84 25.99 1,716,450 328,675.00
(25% incr tier, 25% incr. base)
Scenario 9 5.03 81.07 5.03 27.03 1,782,185 394,410.00
(30% incr tier, 30% incr. base)
Scenario 10 5.22
(35% incr tier, 35% incr. base)
84.19 5.22 28.07
1,847,920 1,847,920.00
Assumptions /Information
2010 actual usage is down about 8 -9%
Decreased 2008 -2009 usage for 25k+ accts by 20% (10% for 2010 and 10% for 2011)
With every 1% per qtr base rates are raised an additional $9,299 revenue is created
0 With every 1% per gal (over the base rate) is raised an additional $3,848 revenue is created
Prelim 2011 Budgeted expense for the Sewer Fund is $ 1,786,799
\ \Moundserver \shareddata \FINANCE DEPT \BONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTS \Department Analysis \UTILITY ANALYSIS &
WATER RATE STUDY \Rate Scenarios 2011.xisx
S+orm C i P
STORM
S-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP): 2011-2015
STORM WATER FUND PROJECT COSTS
STORM SEWER, DRAINAGE & WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS
(includes 30% Indirect Cost and Street Replacement Cost)
61 "01
Treatment Pond at Commerce S. of Sherwood Dr.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$69,068
F
A&4
j 4 - 7
W ---
Rain Garden at Overland Ln. & Noble Ln.
Storm Water Utility Fund
Sandfilter at Overland Ln. & Pike Rd.
Storm Water Utility Fund
Bioretention Area at Waterside Ln. & Tonkawood Rd.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$10,000
Bioretention Area at Basswood Ln. & Tonkawood Rd.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$30,000
Bioretention Area at Ashland Ln. & Pike Rd.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$15,000
Storm Water Treatment Unit at Beachwood Rd. W. of Commerce Blvd.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$50,000
Drainage Improvements, Swenson Park at Tuxedo Blvd. & Brighton Blvd.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$30,000
Bioretention Area, Philbrook Park at Clover Circle
Storm Water Utility Fund
$25,000
Bioretention Area at Grandview Blvd. W. of Commerce Blvd.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$20,000
Treatment Pond at Hillcrest Rd. & Diamond Ln.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$30,000
Bioretention Area at Westedge Blvd. N. of Beachwood Rd.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$25,000
Bioretention Area at Lynwood Blvd. & Cottonwood Ln.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$40,000
Bioretention Area at Evergreen Water Tower Site
Storm Water Utility Fund
$40,000
Bioretention Area at Tuxedo Blvd. & Clyde Rd.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$50,000
Bioretention Area at Clyde Rd. & Island View Dr.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$25,000
Bioretention Area at W. end of Island View Dr.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$20,000,
Bioretention Area, Mound Bay Park at Bartlett Blvd.
Storm Water Utility Fund
$25,000
New Storm Sewer & Street Restoration w/ Annual Street Project
Storm Water Utility Fund
$696,221
$425,000
$211,000
$489,300
$145,400
$173,300
jAnnual Outlet Cleaning - 10 Locations
Storm Water Utility Fund
$30,000
$30,000
$30,000
$30,000
$30,000
$30,000
lAnnual Repairs & Pond Cleaning
Storm Water Utility Fund
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20000
ITOTALS
$765,289
$155,000
$580,0001
$366,0001
$659,300
$195,4
$223,300
0 0 0
0
CITY OF
UTILITY
Fund $: 760,000
2001A
-
20038
590,000
2004B
-
2005B
206,584
20068
STORM FUND BONDS
400,350 - 784,300
20078 2008C 20098
•
580,000
2011 est
54w y n
366,000 659,300 195,400
2012 est 2013 est 2014 est
•
- Deob+ Svc
223,300 Total Total
Storm Water Water, Sewer,
2015 est Rev Bonds Storm Bonds
2001 -2015 2001 -2015
.
Pay Year
I
% Ch
2008
59,785
0
42,533
0
15,596
15,795
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
133,709
805,339
2009
58,563
0
41,833
0
15,334
29,140
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
144,869
962,222
19%
2010
57,303
0
41,083
0
15,068
28,630
0
32,905
0
0
0
0
0
174,988
1,154,054
20%
2011
60,904
0
40,283
0
15,615
28,954
0
56,796
0
0
0
0
0
202,552
1,315,321
14%
2012
59,355
0
44,383
0
15,311
28,412
0
56,222
74,692
0
0
0
0
278,376
1,531,625
16%
2013
57,754
0
43,370
0
15,821
28,705
0
57,873
74,692
25,986
0
0
0
304,200
1,662,988
9%
2014
60,980
0
42,345
0
15,477
28,965
0
57,098
74,692
25,986
46,789
0
0
352,332
1,889,929
14%
2015
59,040
0
41,308
0
15,946
29,193
0
57,009
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
0
363,807
2,028,762
7%
2016
61,935
0
40,258
0
15,561
28,556
0
56,819
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
15,833
380,273
2,162,449
7%
2017
59,663
0
44,073
0
15,985
28,730
0
56,564
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
15,833
382,159
2,175,057
1%
2018
57,368
0
42,753
0
15,552
28,849
0
56,244
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
15,833
377,909
2,160,628
-1%
2019
59,945
0
41,395
0
15,929
28,934
0
56,616
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
15,833
379,964
2,179,107
1%
2020
62,268
0
40,000
0
15,451
28,985
0
56,798
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
15,833
380,646
2,095,934
-4%
2021
59,463
0
43,489
0
15,786
29,002
0
56,069
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
15,833
380,953
2,087,087
0%
2022
61,530
0
41,853
0
16,083
28,985
0
56,069
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
15,833
381,665
2,086,704
0%
2023
0
0
45,090
0
15,523
29,767
0
56,007
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
15,833
323,532
1,987,014
-5%
2024
0
0
43,200
0
15,772
29,648
0
56,643
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
15,833
322,408
1,992,857
0%
2025
0
0
46,125
0
15,985
29,495
0
56,426
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
15,833
325,176
1,991,593
0%
'2026
0
0
0
0
16,163
30,127
0
56,124
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
15,833
279,559
1,871,215
-6%
2027
0
0
0
0
0
29,845
0
56,488
74,692
25,986
46,789
13,845
15,833
263,478
1,529,398
-18%
IThru 2033
895,853
0
765,369
0
297,956
599,077
0
1,163,116
1,493,840
519,720
935,780
263, 055_
284,994 1
7,218,760
41,752,187
S: \FINANCE DEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTS \BOND ISSUES \UTILITY REVENUE BONDS \Utility Debt Schedule OFFICIAL
V
City of Mound
...�. Storm Water Rate Scenarios 2011
Number of Residential Commercial Total Projected Increase in •
Fee /Qtr Households Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue
Current Rates 12.00 3,593 172,464.00 53,856.00 226,320 -
Scenario 1 14.00 3,593 201,208.00 53,856.00 255,064 28,744.00
(incr 17% qtrly fee)
Scenario 2 16.00 3,593 229,952.00 53,856.00 283,808 57,488.00
(incr 33% qtrly fee)
Scenario 3 18.00 3,593 258,696.00 53,856.00 312,552 86,232.00
(incr 50% qtrly fee)
Scenario 4 20.00 3,593 287,440.00 53,856.00 341,296 114,976.00
(incr 67% qtrly fee)
Scenario 5 22.00
(incr 83% qtrly fee)
Scenario 6 24.00
(incr 100% qtrly fee)
Scenario 7 26.00
(incr 117% qtrly fee)
3,593
316,184.00
53,856.00
370,040
143,720.00
3,593
344,928.00
53,856.00
398,784
172,464.00
3,593 373,672.00 53,856.00 427,528 201,208.00 1 0
Assumptions /Information
With every $1 p month storm water fee is increased an additional $14,372 revenue is created
Commercial accounts are currently billed $4,488 in total for storm water each month.
Prelim 2011 Budgeted expense for the Storm Water Fund is $ 354,270
7
\ \Moundserver \shareddata \FINANCE DEPT\BONDS & CAPITAL PROJECTS \Department Analysis \UTILITY ANALYSIS & WATER
RATE STUDY \Rate Scenarios 2011.xlsx
•
Monthly
Grand
Total
58.61
45.16
60.85
60.85
47.11
65.02
55.96
65.33
26.90
32.10
51.00
54.23
Incr.
54.36
52.11
77.42
nv-e..y-
dDtp
•
•
City of Mound
Utility
Bills Comparison
MONTHLY
AVERAGE - based on
water use of 15,000
gallons per Quarter or 5,000 per
month
Water
Water
Total
Sewer
Sewer
Total
Storm
City
Base Rate
Over Base
Water
Base
Over Base
Sewer
Recycling
Water
Mound
5.00
17.55
22.55
20.79
7.02
27.81
4.25
4.00
Columbia Hghts
6.61
15.85
22.46
6.08
9.90
15.98
3.87
2.85
2
Orono (A1)
8.00
10.75
18.75
36.58
N/A
36.58
2.08
3.43
0
1
Orono (A2)
8.00
10.75
18.75
36.58
N/A
36.58
2.08
3.43
0
Victoria
8.29
13.25
21.54
9.90
10.00
19.90
1.67
4.00
A
C
Medina
9.00
12.25
21.25
18.48
23.10
41.58
N/A
2.19
T
Minnetrista
6.50
14.95
21.45
28.34
N/A
28.34
3.17
3.00
U
A
Hamel
12.50
11.25
23.75
18.48
23.10
41.58
N/A
N/A
L
Farmington
4.00
5.50
9.50
9.00
5.40
14.40
N/A
3.00
R
Minnetonka
0.00
9.00
9.00
15.50
0.00
15.50
2.50
5.10
A
T
Spring Park
4.00
16.25
20.25
2.50
28.25
30.75
N/A
N/A
E
S
Golden Valley
6.00
20.90
26.90
17.33
N/A
17.33
2.67
7.33
($1 Credit for ACH)
Waverly
12.00
50.00
62.00
10.75
57.50
68.25
1.00
Watertown
14.50
10.76
25.26
8.00
18.60
26.60
N/A
2.50
Mid Point (CURRENT 2009 RATES):
23.10
30.08
1.66
3.14
Proposed 2011 Rates
12.00
23.18
35.18
23.90
7.42
31.32
4.25
6.67
•
Monthly
Grand
Total
58.61
45.16
60.85
60.85
47.11
65.02
55.96
65.33
26.90
32.10
51.00
54.23
Incr.
54.36
52.11
77.42
nv-e..y-
dDtp
4OL44 0 04 3 04 3
Cit y Mound
of M
Street Light Replacement - Fund 401 -43160
Summary of Sources and Uses
as of 11/30/2010
Sources:
Federal ARRA Grant
MSA Funding
Transfer from Street Light Fees
Total Sources
Uses:
American Engineering Testing
Bolton & Menk Inc.
Egan Companies
Hennepin County
Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc
The Laker Newspaper
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Reed Business Information
WSB and Associates Inc.
Total Uses $ 1,024,637 $ 87,501 $ 1,112,137
Fund 401 -43160
as of 11 -30 -10
$ 630,000
193,971
47,459
Amount
Remaining
190,708
50,000
n I
Total
630,000
384,679
97,459
$ 871,430 $ 240,708 $
1,112,138
$ 6,211 $
6,211
6,931
6,931
921,778 82,758
1,004,536
265
265
65
65
510
510
296
296
1,749
1,749
86,833 4,743
91,576
Net $ 0