2012-08-28 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
0
•
*E. 2011 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Highland
Area (MSA Route)
1. Approve Resolution Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering 1952
Preparation of Proposed Assessment on 2011 Street, Utility and
Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Highland Area (MSA Route)
2. Approve Resolution for Hearing on Proposed Assessment for the 2011 1953
Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Highland
Area (MSA Route)
*F. 2011 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — SW Island Area
1. Approve Resolution Declaring Cost to be Assessed and Ordering 1954
Preparation of Proposed Assessment on 2011 Street, Utility and
Retaining Wall Improvement Project — SW Island Area
2. Approve Resolution for Hearing on Proposed Assessment for the 2011 1955
Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project— SW Island Area
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2012 - 7:00 PM
MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
* Consent A eg nda Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call
vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
Page
1. Open meeting
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approve agenda, with any amendments
4. * Consent A eg nda
*A. Approve payment of claims 1914 -1935
*B. Approve minutes: Aug 16, 2012 rescheduled regular meeting 1936 -1946
*C. Approve amendment to Temporary Sign Permit for 2012 Scarecrow Stomp 1947 -1948
*D. Adopt Ordinance to Amend Chapter 119 of the Mound City Code as it 1949 -1951
Relates to Signs
. 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda.
(Limit to 3 minutes per speaker)
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
6. Discussion on supervisor compensation and direction to Staff and Personnel 1956 -1994
Committee regarding employee classification and compensation study, including
timing of such study and any recommendations.
0 7. Discussion and action on Contract for Law Enforcement Services between the 1995 -2008
City of Orono and the City of Mound
8. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director, discussing issues related to the 2013
Preliminary Budget and Levy, requesting direction
A. Proposal to increase Villa Dock Fees to fund an interfund loan to the HRA 2009 -2014
for use in debt service for the 2009D Dump Bonds, in addition to and
subordinate to the amount levied for such purpose
B. Request by the LMCC to raise Medicacom PEG access fees from $.84 to 2015 -2016
$1.21 and pass that amount through to the LMCC
C.
Review of preliminary budget assumptions with regard to liquor store
2017
profit assumptions, transfers, and equipment certificates
D.
Request to issue an RFP for prosecution services
2018 -2026
E.
Request to join the Metro Cities Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
2027 -2032
to increase exposure to the Metropolitan Council and work toward unfunded
mandate relief
0 9.
Information/Miscellaneous
A.
Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager
B.
Minutes: Minnetonka Beach/Dakota Trail Minutes: June 11, 2012
2033 -2036
C.
Reports: Finance Department — July 2012 Reports
2037 -2039
D.
Correspondence: Letter /Lake Minnetonka Association: Aug 13, 2012
2040
Letter /Sheriff Stanek: Aug 21, 2012
2041 -2042
10. Adjourn
Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting.
More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site:
www.ci&ofinound.com
U
COUNCIL BRIEFING
August 28, 2012
Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!!
Aug 28 — 6:55 — HRA regular meeting
Aug 28 — 7:00 -- CC regular meeting
Sept 11 — 6:30 — HRA regular meeting
Sept 11 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting (2013 Preliminary Budget Adoption)
Sept 25 — 6:30 — HRA regular meeting
Sept 25 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting
Oct 6 —10:00 -1:00 -- Scarecrow Stomp
Oct 9 — 6:30 — HRA regular meeting
Oct 9 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting
Oct 13 — 8:00 -12:00 — Recycling Day
Oct 17 —1:30 -3:30 — Flu Shots
Oct 23— 6:30 — HRA regular meeting
Oct 23 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting
Nov 2 — Seasonal Hours end
Nov 4 - Daylight Saving Time ends
Nov 15 — 6:00 — Tree Lighting Ceremony
Citv Hall Closines
Sept 3
Labor Day
Nov 12
Veteran's Day observed
Nov 22 -23
Thanksgiving
• Dec 24
Christmas Eve
Dec 25
Christmas Day
City Official's Absences
Sept 14 -16
Kandis Hanson Vacation
Sept 28 -30
Kandis Hanson Vacation
Oct 5 -11
Kandis Hanson City Manager's Conf & vacation
Inquire in advance, please......
Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more research
may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision - making. You
may email the relative department head and copy the City Manager to expedite the answers to your questions.
•
City of Mound Claims as of 08 -28 -12
•
YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT
2012
AUG- UB -PSTG
$
350.80
2012
0813CITYMAN
$
7,007.64
2012
0817CITYMAN
$
848,480.07
2012
JULYBOLTMENK
$
133,813.27
r�
L-All
2012 082812CITY $ 61,148.09
2012 082812 H WS $ 59,966.83
TOTAL CLAIMS $ 1,110,766.70
:7
-1914-
SAFINANCE DEPT\AP \CITY COUNCIL CLAIMS LISTING
MOUND, MN 08/16/12 4:13 PM
\�
Payments Page 1
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: August 2012
Batch Name AUG- UB -PSTG User Dollar Amt $350.80
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $350.80
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 MOUND POST OFFICE _
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -322 Postage AUGUST 2012 UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $175.40
Invoice 08172012 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -322 Postage AUGUST 2012 UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $175.40
Invoice 08172012 8/17/2012
Transaction Date 8/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $350.80
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
601 WATER FUND $175.40
602 SEWER FUND $175.40
$350.80
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $350.80
Total $350.80
•
•
-1915-
_ MOUND, MN 08/13/12 1:34 PM
Page 1
Payments
CITY OF MOULD
•
Batch Name 0813CITYMAN
Payment
Transaction Date 8/13/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Current Period: August 2012
Computer Dollar Amt $7,007.64 Posted
Refer 2 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OF Ck# 041558 8/13/2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -450 Board of Prisoners JULY 2012 PER DIEM AND PROCESSING
FEES
Invoice 1000018912 7/31/2012
Refer 3 MADSEN, MITCH Ck# 041559 8/13/2012
Cash Payment G 101-232542561 WEXFORD PL #12 -10 ESCROW BALANCE REFUND 2561
WEXFORD LANE - MADSEN, M.
Invoice 08132012 8/1/2012
Transaction Date 8/13/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$407.14
$407.14
$600.50
$600.50
Refer 1 WOOD, MICHAEL AND MICHELLE Ck# 041560 8/13/2012
Cash Payment G 101 -23150 New Construction Escrow ESCROW BALANCE REFUND 2270 $5,000.00
LANGDON LANE - WOOD, M.
Invoice 081312 7/31/2012
Cash Payment G 101 -23007 Erosion Control Escrow ESCROW BALANCE REFUND 2270 $1,000.00
LANGDON LANE - WOOD, M.
Invoice 081312 7/31/2012
Transaction Date 8/13/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,000.00
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND $7,007.64
$7,007.64
•
Pre - Written Check $7,007.64
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00
Total $7,007.64
-1916-
CITY OF MOUND
Batch Name 0817CITYMAN
Payment
MOUND, MN
Payments
Current Period: August 2012
Now
Computer Dollar Amt $848,480.07 Posted
Refer 3 BARNES, LAMARR & MARIA Ck# 041677 8/17/2012
•
Cash Payment G 101 -23253 4857 Island View Dr. BARNE ESCROW BALANCE REFUND 4857 IVD -
$463.50
PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT BARNES, LAMARR &
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$4,235.71
MARIA
Invoice 08172012 8/13/2012
NEUTRAL SAFETY SWITCH, FIRE RESCUE
$49.06
Transaction Date 8/16/2012 Due 0
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$463.50
Refer 2 GMHASPHALT Ck# 041678 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E 60249450 -440 Other Contractual Servic
BITUMINOUS WEAR PARKING AREA @
$2,970.00
$49.06
NORTHERN LANE LIFT STATION
Invoice 2026 8/7/2012
PAY REQUEST #1 & FINAL FOR 2012
$5,745.60
Transaction Date 8/16/2012 Due 0
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$2,970.00
Refer 5 GMH ASPHALT Ck# 041678 8/17/2012
AREA
Cash Payment E 60249450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
PAY REQUEST #3 WORK COMPLETED THRU
$674.03
JULY 27TH 2012 STREET IMPROV PROJ
PW12 -03
Invoice 08172012 8/9/2012
Project PW1203
Cash Payment E 40143110 -500 Capital Outlay FA
PAY REQUEST #3 WORK COMPLETED THRU
$509.81
JULY 27TH 2012 STREET IMPROV PROJ
PW12 -04
•
Invoice 08172012 8/9/2012
Project PW1204
Cash Payment E 40143112 -500 Capital Outlay FA
PAY REQUEST #3 WORK COMPLETED THRU
$623,790.21
JULY 27TH 2012 STREET IMPROV PROJ PIN
12 -01
Invoice 08172012 8/9/2012
Project PW1201
Transaction Date 8/16/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $624,974.05
Refer 6 GMH ASPHALT Ck# 041678 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E401-43101-500 Capital Outlay FA PAY REQUEST #8 WORK COMPLETED FEB $208,955.70
8 THRU JULY 13 2012 ON 2011 STREET
IMPROV PROJ. PIN 11 -01, 11-02,11-04
Invoice 080712 8/9/2012 Project PW1101
Transaction Date 8/16/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $208,955.70
Refer 4 MINNCOMM UTILITY CONSTRUCTI Ck# 041679 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA PAY REQUEST #4 & FINAL IVD - WINDSOR $4,235.71
WATERMAIN LOOP PROJ PIN 12 -07
Invoice 08172012 8/8/2012
Project PW1207
Transaction Date 8/16/2012 Due 0
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$4,235.71
Refer 1 NAPA AUTO PARTS - SPRING PAR Ck# 041680 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E 22242260409 Other Equipment Repair
NEUTRAL SAFETY SWITCH, FIRE RESCUE
$49.06
TRUCK 96 FORD F350
Invoice 817977 7/21/2012
Transaction Date 8/16/2012 Due 0
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$49.06
Refer 8 PRECISION SEALCOA TING, INCOR Ck# 041681 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E 42743121 -300 Professional Srvs
PAY REQUEST #1 & FINAL FOR 2012
$5,745.60
SEALCOAT PROJ- PW12 -06 SHIRLEY HILLS
•
AREA
Invoice 08172012 8/9/2012
Project PW1206
08/23/12 9:39 AM
Page 1
-1917-
is
•
Pre - Written Check $848,480.07
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00
Total $848,480.07
-1918-
MOUND, MN
08/23/12 9:39 AM
_
Page 2
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: August 2012
Transaction Date 8/16/2012
Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,745.60
Refer 7 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC Ck# 041682 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA RETAINAGE BALANCE 2011 EMERGENCY
$1,086.45
FORCEMAIN REPAIR LIFT STATION P1, 4657
IVD
Invoice 08072012 8/9/2012
Transaction Date 8/16/2012
Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,086.45
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
602 SEWER FUND
$4,730.48
601 WATER FUND
$4,235.71
427 SEAL COAT FUND
$5,745.60
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
$833,255.72
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
$49.06
101 GENERAL FUND
$463.50
$848,480.07
is
•
Pre - Written Check $848,480.07
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00
Total $848,480.07
-1918-
MOUND, MN 08/23/129:22 AM
Page 1
Payments
1 ....... . ---
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: August 2012
Batch Name JULYBOLTMENK User Dollar Amt $133,813.27
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $133,813.27
Refer 1 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0149691 7/31/2012
Cash Payment E 402 -43120 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0149698 7/31/2012
Cash Payment E 401 -43101 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0149701
7/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 401 -43127 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0149702
7/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0149703
7/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0149704
7/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0149706
7/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 601 -49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0149707
7/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 675 -49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0149708
7/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 401 -43112 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0149709
7/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 675 -49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0149711
7/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0149712
7/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0149693
7/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 - 43100 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0149687
7/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0149710 7/31/2012
$0.00 In Balance
I & I ANALYSIS; 2011 CIPP PROJECT SVCS $2,563.50
THRU JULY 20 2012
MSA SYSTEM UPDATE SVCS THRU JULY 20 $1,278.00
2012
2011 SW ISLAND STREET PROJ PW11 -01 $6,175.00
ENGINEER SVCS THRU JULY 20 2012
Project PW1101
2011 HIGHLANDS STREET PROJ PW11 -02 $5,309.50
ENGINEER SVCS THRU JULY 20 2012
Project PW1102
SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU JULY $2,493.50
202012
2010 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJECT $2,972.50
ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JULY 20 2012
2011 LIFT STATIONS PROJECT PW 11-
$5,772.50
03ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JULY 20 2012
Project PW1103
2012 IVD WINDSOR RD WATERMAIN LOOP
$257.50
PROJECT PW 12 -07 ENGINEERING SVCS
THRU JULY 20 2012
Project PW1207
2011 STORM DRAIN IMPROV PROJ. PW11 -05
$213.00
ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JULY 20 2012
Project PW1105
2012 NORTH ISLAND STREET PROJ. PW 12-
$94,120.73
01 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JULY 20 2012
Project PW1201
2012 STORM DRAIN IMPROV. PROJ PW 12-
$2,065.50
05 ENGINEERING SVCSTHRU JULY 20 2012
Project PW1205
2012 LIFT STATION PROJECTS PW12 -03
$3,380.04
ENGINEERING SVCSTHRU JULY 20 2012
Project PW1203
UPDATE STREET & UTILITY MAPS
$213.00
ENGINEERING THRU JULY 20 2012
Project 12-4
GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JULY
$542.50
202012
SANITARY SEWER EMERGENCY $951.50
FORCEMAIN REPAIR LS P -1 ENGINEERING
SVCS THRU JULY 20 2012
•
-1919-
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $133,813.27
Total $133,813.27
•
-1920-
MOUND, MN
08/23/12 9:22 AM
Page 2
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: August 2012
Cash Payment G 101 -23258 4354 Wilshire - Hazuka #12 -1 4354 WILSHIRE GLENN /HAZUKA PLAN
$71.00
REVIEW & MTG ENGINEER SVCS THRU
JULY 20 2012
Invoice 0149695 7/31/2012
Cash Payment G 101 -23259 5938 Idlewood
5938 IDLEWOOD - ANDERSON PROPERTY
$142.00
ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JULY 20 2012
Invoice 0149695 7/31/2012
Cash Payment E 427 -43121 -300 Professional Srvs
2012 CRACK & SEALCOAT ENGINEERING
$3,659.50
SVC THRU JULY 20 2012 PROJ PW12 -06
Invoice 0149713 7/31/2012
Project PW1206
Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs
STORMWATER SWPPP UPDATE SVCS
$780.50
THRU JULY 20 2012
Invoice 0149697 7/31/2012
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs
WATER SYSTEM MODELING SVCS THRU
$497.00
JULY 20 2012
Invoice 0149690 7/31/2012
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -300 Professional Srvs
WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN SVCS THRU
$355.00
JULY 20 2012
Invoice 0149699 7/31/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$133,813.27
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
•
101 GENERAL FUND
$755.50
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
$105,605.23
402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT
$1,278.00
427 SEAL COAT FUND
$3,659.50
601 WATER FUND
$1,109.50
602 SEWER FUND
$15,853.04
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
$5,552.50
$133,813.27
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $133,813.27
Total $133,813.27
•
-1920-
MOUND, MN
08/23/12 9:53 AM
_
Page 1
/
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: August 2012
Batch Name 082812CITY User Dollar Amt $61,148.09
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $61,148.09
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 7 A -1 RENTAL OF LAKE MINNETONK
_
Cash Payment G 101 -22802 Festival
BOAT LANDING CLOSED FOR FESTIVAL
$90.03
SIGN
Invoice 85051 7/13/2012
Cash Payment E 285 -46388 -220 Repair/Maint Supply
lift- straight boom 42' for electrical repair at
$154.97
parking deck
Invoice 85840 7/18/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$245.00
Refer 83 BECK, KENNETH
_
Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -434 Conference & Training MEAL REIMB K. BECK CAMP RIPLEY
$12.50
TRAINING 8 -16 -12
Invoice 08282012 8/21/2012
Transaction Date 8/2212012
.-
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$12.50
Refer 87 BENZ, JULIE
Cash Payment E 10141110 -430 Miscellaneous
2012 SPIRIT OF THE LAKES /CENTENNIAL
$192.38
FESTIVAL PHOTO PROOF BOOK
Invoice 329481 8/21/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$192.38
•
Refer 8 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -210 Operating Supplies
COFFEE & CREAMER
$73.50
Invoice 1033800 8/8/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$73.50
Refer 84 BLUE LAGOON MARINE
Cash Payment E222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
OUTBOARD MOTOR OIL- FIRE BOAT #11
$46.63
Invoice 2098202 8/14/2012 PO 23399
Transaction Date 8/22/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$46.63
Refer 9 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPP
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260402 Building Maintenance
15 HIGH EFFICIENCY LIGHTS -FIRE STATION
$459.99
Invoice 904342854 7/27/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$459.99
Refer 12 BUSINESS FORMS AND ACCOUNT
Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -210 Operating Supplies
5000 LASER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS
$467.33
#42001 THRU 47000
Invoice 46212 8/14/2012 PO 23915
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$467.33
Refer 13 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/I49
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts
AUTO BATTERY TRUCK #175 STREETS
$85.49
Invoice 6974 - 187006 7/24/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
CLEANER WAX
$12.77
Invoice 6974 - 187134 7/26/2012
Project 12 -3
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts
WATER PUMP, THERMOSTAT, PARTS FOR
$128.36
TRUCK #1205 WATER'05 CHEVY SILVERADO
•
Invoice 6974 - 187006 7/24/2012
Transaction Date 8121/2012
Wells F.Q-n 10100 Total
$226.62
-1921-
Refer 14 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG _
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 08282012 8/9/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 08282012 8/9/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 08282012 8/9/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 08282012 8/9/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 08282012 8/9/2012
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 08282012 8/9/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 08282012 8/9/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Invoice 2012 -1479 7/23/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $309.74
Refer 17 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS _
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials COTE ALL (SAFETY) & ACRYLIC FINISH $102.47
Invoice 802139289 6/29/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $102.47
Refer 15 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER RENTAL
$17.23
Invoice 00073895 7/31/2012
Project 12 -3
Transac Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$17.23
• Refer 16 DANA HOAGLAND PLUMBING, INC. _
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -402 Building Maintenance
RBUILD RPZ & INSTALL 2 VACUUM
$154.87
BREAKERS ON BOILER DRAINS- PUBLIC
SAFETY BLDG
Invoice 2012 -1479 7/23/2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -402 Building Maintenance
RBUILD RPZ & INSTALL 2 VACUUM
$154.87
BREAKERS ON BOILER DRAINS- PUBLIC
SAFETY BLDG
Refer 18 FITZCO, INCORPORATED _
Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -219 Safety supplies 25 SHARP BIOHAZARD CONTAINERS
Invoice 46153 8/10/2012 PO 24120
i s
$25.38
Transaction Date 8/21/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $25.38
RPfPr 10 F ULLERTON BUILDING CENTER
Cash Payment
Invoice 2166234
Cash Payment
Invoice 2161821
Cash Payment
Invoice 2166234
Transaction Date
E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts LUMBER FOR PW TRAILER
7/10/2012 PO 23912
E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CREDIT RETURN LUMBER
2/13/2012
E 28145210 -525 Other Capital Improveme CREDIT RETURN LUMBER
7/10/2012
8/21/2012
GAS SERVICE THRU 7 -20
GAS SERVICE THRU 7 -20
GAS SERVICE THRU 7 -20
Project 12 -3
GAS SERVICE THRU 7 -20
GAS SERVICE THRU 7 -20
GAS SERVICE THRU 7 -20
GAS SERVICE THRU 7 -20 DEPOT BLDG
$57.76
$51.49
$63.52
$22.68
$49.75
$49.75
$30.32
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $325.27
Wells Fargo 10100
$37.99
- $18.65
- $18.65
Total $0.69
Refer 19 G & K SERVICES
-1922-
Project 12 -3
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MN
Payments
Current Period: August 2012
08/23/12 9:53 AM
Page 3
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SVC 8 -13 -12
$40.76
Invoice 1006877825 8/13/2012
UNIFORM SVC 8-6 -12
$24.40
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies
SHOP SUPPLIES 8 -13 -12
$59.66
Invoice 1006877825 8/13/2012
UNIFORM SVC 8-6 -12
$25.27
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SVC 8 -20 -12
$45.48
Invoice 1006889009 8/20/2012
UNIFORM SVC 8 -6 -12
$35.52
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 8 -20 -12
$65.64
Invoice 1006889009 8/20/2012
SHOP SUPPLIES 8 -6 -12
$162.55
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$211.54
Refer 20 G & K SERVICES
SUPPLIES & MAT SVC 820 -12
$183.21
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SVC 7 -30 -12
$24.40
Invoice 1006855734 7/30/2012
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 8 -20 -12
$76.39
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SVC 7 -30 -12
$25.27
Invoice 1006855734 7/30/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$507.34
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SVC 7 -30 -12
$35.52
Invoice 1006855734 7/30/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
SHOP SUPPLIES 7 -30 -12
$249.58
Invoice 1006855734 7/30/2012
Project 12 -3
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services
MAT SVC 7 -02 -12
$57.07
Invoice 1006811423 7/2/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $391.84
Refer 21 G & K SERVICES _
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SVC 8-6 -12
$24.40
Invoice 1006866743 8/6/2012
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SVC 8-6 -12
$25.27
Invoice 1006866743 8/6/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SVC 8 -6 -12
$35.52
Invoice 1006866743 8/6/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
SHOP SUPPLIES 8 -6 -12
$162.55
Invoice 1006866743 8/6/2012
Project 12 -3
Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services
SUPPLIES & MAT SVC 820 -12
$183.21
Invoice 1006889008 8/20/2012
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 8 -20 -12
$76.39
Invoice 1006889003 8/20/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$507.34
R efer 22 HACH COMPANY
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 7870145 7/30/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Refer 23 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO
Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -418 Other Rentals
Invoice 120738034 7/31/2012
Cash Payment E 22242260418 Other Rentals
Invoice 120738033 7/31/2012
WATER TESTING SUPPLIES SPADNS $64.05
REAGENT SOL
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64.05
RADIO LEASE & ADMIN FEE JULY 2012 $1,130.21
POLICE DEPT
RADIO LEASE & ADMIN FEE JULY 2012 FIRE $698.91
DEPT
0
J
•
Transaction Date 8/21/2012 Wells Fargo 10 100 Total $1,829.12
-1923-
-1924-
MOUND, MN
08/23/12 9:53 AM
Page 4
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: August 2012
Refer 37 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I _
Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -300 Professional Srvs
MOUND MISC PLANNING SVCS JULY 2012
$722.65
Invoice 007 - 001 -51 8/2/2012
Cash Payment G 101 -23247 WALGREENS #11 -10 SEMP
WALGREENS SEMPTER DEVELOP MISC
$41.50
PLANNING SVCS JULY 2012
Invoice 007 - 001 -50 8/2/2012
Cash Payment G 101 -23255 2125 Commerce - Animal Hos
WESTONKA ANIMAL HOSPITAL #12 -12 MISC
$20.75
PLANNING SVCS JULY 2012
Invoice 007 - 001 -51 8/2/2012
Cash Payment G 101 -23255 2125 Commerce - Animal Hos
WESTONKA ANIMAL HOSPITAL #12 -12 MISC
$41.50
PLANNING SVCS JULY 2012
Invoice 007 - 001 -50 8/212012
Cash Payment G 101 -23259 5938 Idlewood
SYNERGY - HISLOP 5938 IDLEWOOD
$1,610.30
PLANNING SVCS JULY 2012
Invoice 007 - 001 -50 8/2/2012
Cash Payment G 101 -23258 4354 Wilshire - Hazuka #12 -1
4354 WILSHIRE VAR. #12 -15 Glenn - Hazuka
$103.75
PLANNING SVCS JULY 2012
Invoice 007 - 001 -50 8/2/2012
Transaction Date 8/14/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$2,540.45
Refer 86 HOME DEPOT CREDIT (FIRE) _
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies
LONG NOSE TLS, KL CUTTERS
$79.22
5125276 8/2/2012
• Invoice
Tr Date 8/22/2012
W ells Fargo 10100 Total
$79.22
Refer 25 JT HARDWARE SPECIALITIES _
Cash Payment E 10143100 -221 Equipment Parts
STEEL ADAPTER
$34.20
Invoice 08102012 8/10/2012 PO 24014
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$34.20
Refer 88 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN _
Cash Payment G 101 -23089 MHR Phase II Auditors Road
MHR TIF 1 -3 LEGAL SERVICES JULY 2012
$448.00
Invoice 109727 8/20/2012
Cash Payment G 101 -23257 RON CLARK LOST LAKE VI
LOST LAKE PROPOSAL -RON CLARK HOMES
$343.00
LEGAL SVCS JULY 2012
Invoice 109727 8/20/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$791.00
Refer 24 LA WSON PRODUCTS, INC _
Cash Payment E 60249450 -230 Shop Materials
QUICK LINK 5/16"
$45,49
Invoice 9301001886 7/31/2012
Project 12 -3
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
MISC PARTS, COUPLERS, ADAPTERS,
$173.30
BRAKE KLEAN, BIT, NUTSETTER
Invoice 9301015777 8/7/2012
Project 12 -3
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$218.79
Refer 28 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T _
Cash Payment G 101 -22802 Festival
FESTIVAL FIREWORKS INSURANCE RIDER-
$250.00
7 -21 -12
Invoice 41252 8/15/2012
Date 8/23/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$250.00
• Transaction
Refer 4 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR -
-1924-
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MN
Payments
Current Period: August 2012
Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA B200 4TH FLOOR COPIER
Invoice 1441608 8/13/2012
08/23/12 9:53 AM
Page 5
$13.31
$13.31
$115.93
$71.32
Transaction Date 8/13/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $213.87
Refer 11 MADDEN, GALANTER, HANSON, L _
Cash Payment E 101 -49999 -300 Professional Srvs LABOR RELATIONS SERVICES JULY 2012 $411.60
Invoice 08282012 8/1/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -49999 -300 Professional Srvs ARBITRATION & ADMINISTRATIVE $5,359.52
HEARINGS LABOR RELATIONS JULY 2012
•
Invoice 08282012 8/1/2012
SEPT 19 -21 2012 MN AWWA CONFERENCE,
BLACK & WHITE OVERAGE 7 -10 THRU 8 -9
Invoice 0438184
8/3/2012
$5,771.12
Cash Payment
E 60249450 -202 Duplicating and copying
KONICA MINOLTA 8200 4TH FLOOR COPIER
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts
MISC LUMBER: 2 X 8,2 X 10, 2 X 12
BLACK & WHITE OVERAGE 7 -10 THRU 8 -9
Invoice 0438184
8/3/2012
Project 12 -3
Cash Payment
E 10141910 -202 Duplicating and copying
KONICA MINOLTA C652 MAIL ROOM COPIER
Refer 27 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
B & W COPIES OVERAGE 7 -14 THRU 8 -13
Invoice 1441608
8/13/2012
$245.00
Cash Payment
E 10141910 -202 Duplicating and copying
KONICA MINOLTA C652 MAIL ROOM COPIER
SVC CONNECTION FEE
COLOR COPIES OVERAGE 7 -14 THRU 8 -13
Invoice 1441608 8/13/2012
08/23/12 9:53 AM
Page 5
$13.31
$13.31
$115.93
$71.32
Transaction Date 8/13/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $213.87
Refer 11 MADDEN, GALANTER, HANSON, L _
Cash Payment E 101 -49999 -300 Professional Srvs LABOR RELATIONS SERVICES JULY 2012 $411.60
Invoice 08282012 8/1/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -49999 -300 Professional Srvs ARBITRATION & ADMINISTRATIVE $5,359.52
HEARINGS LABOR RELATIONS JULY 2012
•
Invoice 08282012 8/1/2012
SEPT 19 -21 2012 MN AWWA CONFERENCE,
$245.00
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,771.12
Refer 26 MAYER LUMBER COMPANY, INCO _
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts
MISC LUMBER: 2 X 8,2 X 10, 2 X 12
$101.32 •
Invoice 75228 7/6/2012
BERENT
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$101.32
Refer 27 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$735.00
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -434 Conference & Training
SEPT 19-212012 MN AWWA CONFERENCE,
$245.00
Cash Payment R 601 -49400 -37170 State fee - Water
R. HANSON
$5,793.00
Invoice 08282012 8/15/2012
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -434 Conference & Training
SEPT 19 -21 2012 MN AWWA CONFERENCE,
$245.00
GIESE
Invoice 08282012 8/15/2012
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400434 Conference & Training
SEPT 19 -21 2012 MN AWWA CONFERENCE,
$245.00
BERENT
Invoice 08282012 8/15/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$735.00
Refer 29 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH
Cash Payment R 601 -49400 -37170 State fee - Water
3rd QTR 2012 COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY
$5,793.00
SVC CONNECTION FEE
Invoice 08282012 8/15/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,793.00
Refer 28 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -470 Water Samples
MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM
$77.50
WATER TESTS
Invoice 618085 8/13/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$77.50
Refer 30 MINUTEMAN PRESS _
Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -210 Operating Supplies
VOTER'S RECEIPT PADS
$213.22
•
Invoice 14250 8/1/2012
-1925-
-1926-
MOUND, MN
08/23/12 9:53 AM
Page 6
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: August 2012
Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -203 Printed Forms
POLICE LETTERHEAD, & #10 ENVELOPES,
$187.19
BUSINESS CARDS J. SZCZEPANIK & E.
DYER
Invoice 14282 8/13/2012 PO 24119
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$400.41
Refer 32 MOUND MARKETPLACE LLC
_
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -412 Building Rentals
SEPTEMBER COMMON AREA MTCE &
$1,024.25
INSURANCE HWS
Invoice 08282012 8/15/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,024.25
Refer 31 MOUND, CITY OF
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -382 Water Utilities
WATER SERVICE 7 -3 -12 THRU 8 -1 -12 HWS
$42.56
Invoice 08282012 8/20/2012
Trans action Date 8/21/2012
W Fargo 10100 Total
$42.56
Refer 34 NORLINGS LAKE MINNETONKA LA
_
Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -440 Other Contractual Servic LANDSCAPE SVCS COMMERCE BLVD
$453.15
RETENTION POND IKM MONTHLY MTCE
Invoice 26903 8/2/2012
Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -440 Other Contractual Servic LANDSCAPE SVCS COMMERCE BLVD
$758.81
RETENTION POND TRANSIT STATION
• MONTHLY
Invoice 26902 8/2/2012
MTCE
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,211.96
Refer 35 NS11 MECHANICAL CONTRACTING,
_
Cash Payment E 101 - 41910-440 Other Contractual Servic PREVENTATIVE MTCE CONTRACT SEPT
$1,180.00
2012 THRU DEC 2012
Invoice C002322 8/16/2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -400 Repairs & Maintenance REPLACED BELTS, FILTERS, LUBRICATED
$147.03
FANS, CHECKED PUMPS, BOILERS,
CONDENSERS
Invoice W26128 8/9/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,327.03
Refer 36 OFFICE DEPOT
_
Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -200 Office Supplies
REPORT COVERS ELECTIONS GUIDES
$5.37
Invoice 619325135001 8/3/2012 PO 24006
Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -200 Office Supplies
THERMAL PAPER ROLLS
$4.39
Invoice 619325168001 8/3/2012 PO 24006
Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -200 Office Supplies
TAPE, BINDER CLIPS, 3M TAPE ROLLER
$48.69
Invoice 619325168001 8/3/2012 PO 24006
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
^T a
$58.45
Refer 33 ORDER OF EASTERN STAR, #271
Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous
REFUND 2010 PYMT FOR CITY OF MOUND
$50.00
WELCOME SIGN- CTY RD 15- OES
LOGO /SIGN NOT ABLE TO BE MADE
Invoice 08282012 8/21/2012
Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$50.00
• Transaction
Refer 90 PAINE MASON
-1926-
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MN
Payments
Current Period: August 2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -400 Repairs & Maintenance EXCAVATE, CORE FILLING, NEW
FOUNDATION AND REBAR INSTALLATION
4835 MANCHESTER RD
Invoice 08282012 8/21/2012
08/23/12 9:53 AM
Page 7
$9,980.00
Transaction Date 8/22/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,980.00
Refer 37 PREMIUM WATERS, INC. _
Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -430 Miscellaneous
POLICE DEPT HOT & COLD WATER COOLER
$121.52
RENTALS (2) AUG THRU OCT 2012
Invoice 614850 8/2/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -210 Operating Supplies
PUB WORKS HOT & COLD WATER COOLER
$60.76
RENTAL AUG THRU OCT 2012
Invoice 614851 8/2/2012
Project 12 -3
T r a n sa ction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$182.28
Refer 39 ROBINETTE, JIM _
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic
REIMBURSE J. ROBINETTE, AUTO DETAIL
$268.19
GEHRRINGS CAR WASH DUE TO PW OIL
OVERSPRAY
Invoice 08282012 7/12/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$268.19
Refer 85 SPRINT WIRELESS (FIRE) _
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells
FIRE DEPT DATA CARD ACCESS CHARGES
$6.74
7 -13 THRU 8 -12
Invoice 617320297 -047 8/16/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$6.74
Refer 38 STANNARD, BRAD _
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -400 Repairs & Maintenance
MILFOIL HARVESTING @ CITY DOCKS
$1,800.00
Invoice 08282012 8/14/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,800.00
Refer 40 S TREICHER S _
Cash Payment
Invoice 1941968
Cash Payment
E 101 -42110 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
7/11/2012 PO 23870
E 101 -42110 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1939725 7/11/2012 PO 23870
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts
Invoice 1944415 7/2412012
UNIFORM SHIRT J. SZCZEPANIK
EMBROIDER LOGO UNIFORM SHIRT J.
SZCZEPAN I K
POWER SUPPLY FOR VEHICLE
$59.99
$5.00
$337.92
•
C7
Transaction Date 8/21/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $402.91
Refer 89 SUN NEWSPAPERS -HWS ACCT.
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising CUSTOMER APPREC WINE SALE AD 3 -3 -12 $866.90
HWS
Invoice 1088347 -303 3/3/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $866.90
Refer 7 5 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER
Cash Payment E 375 - 47200 -430 Miscellaneous
Invoice 1120819 8/11/2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 41110430 Miscellaneous
2011 TIF REPORT PUBLICATION 08 -11 -12
LEGAL NOTICE
CITY OF MOUND DISPLAY AD ON MOUND
CENTENNIAL PAGE W /COLOR
$27.56
$399.00 •
Invoice 1113217 7/14/2012
-1927-
MOUND, MN 08/23/12 9:53 AM
Page 8
i L
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: August 2012
Cash Payment E 355 - 46384 -430 Miscellaneous 2011 TIF REPORT PUBLICATION 08 -11 -12 $27.57
LEGAL NOTICE
Invoice 1120819 8/11/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $454.13
Refer 76 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING _
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair / Maint Supply LANDSCAPE FABRIC, 4" DRAIN TILE, BASIN $472.61
KIT
Invoice 10040248 8/8/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $472.61
Refer 77 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS)
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -220 Repair / Maint Supply PAINT BRUSH FOR FIRE HYDRANTS $8.95
Invoice 096389 7/30/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies WASP SPRAY $8.53
Invoice 096449 7/31/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -210 Operating Supplies AAA BATTERIES, SUPER SHOCK $13.34
Invoice 096472 8/1/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -220 Repair/Maint Supply WASP KILLER, 60 LB CONCRETE MIX $40.72
Invoice 096481 8/1/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $71.54
Refer 79 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS)
• Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair / Maint Supply BITS, STUDS- CENTERVIEW $21.31
Invoice 096671 8/7/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -210 Operating Supplies GLOVES, CLOROX WIPES $13.10
Invoice 096730 8/8/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair / Maint Supply ADAPTER, BITS, SCREW BIT SET $26.47
Invoice 096749 8/9/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair / Maint Supply COUPLING, DRAIN END CAP $18.02
Invoice 096948 8/15/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $78.90
Refer 78 VANCE BROTHERS
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -224 Street Maint Materials STREETS CRACK FILLER CRS -2 480 G $557.94
Invoice 23318 8/13/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $557.94
Refer 80 VERIZON WIRELESS _
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells DATALUX COMPUTER BROADBAND SVC $52.04
JUNE 8 THRU AUG 7 FIRE DEPT
Invoice 2782877192 8/7/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012
Refer 82 XCEL ENERGY A ..
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $52.04
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 434662017 8/13/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 434662017 8/13/2012
• Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 434662017 8/13/2012
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 434662017 8/13/2012
ELECTRIC SERVICE 6 -26 -12 TO 7 -26 -12 $198.84
ELECTRIC SERVICE 6 -26 -12 TO 7 -26 -12 $77.96
DEPOT BLDG
ELECTRIC SERVICE 6 -26 -12 TO 7 -26 -12 $2,921.78
ELECTRIC SERVICE 6 -26 -12 TO 7 -26 -12 $4,480.88
-1928-
_ MOUND, MN 08/23/129:53 AM
Page 9
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: August 2012
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SERVICE 6 -26 -12 TO 7 -26 -12
$1,959.01
Invoice 434662017 8/13/2012
GENERAL FUND
$35,967.32
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SERVICE 6 -26 -12 TO 7 -26 -12
$2,042.38
Invoice 434662017 8/13/2012
COMMONS DOCKS FUND
($18.65)
Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SERVICE 6 -26 -12 TO 7 -26 -12
$1,221.70
Invoice 434662017 8/13/2012
2003 -C G.O. TIF 1 -2
$27.57
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SERVICE 6 -26 -12 TO 7 -26 -12
$1,221.70
Invoice 434662017 8/13/2012
WATER FUND
$11,375.55
Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SERVICE 6 -26 -12 TO 7 -26 -12
$1,830.85
Invoice 434662017 8/13/2012
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$4,132.23
Cash Payment E 285 -46388 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SERVICE 6 -26 -12 TO 7 -26 -12
$1,306.05
Invoice 434662017 8/13/2012
Cash Payment E 10142115 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SERVICE 6 -26 -12 TO 7 -26 -12
$35.81
Invoice 434662017 8/13/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$17,296.96
Refer 81 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INCOR
_
Cash Payment E 10143100 -221 Equipment Parts
2 ELGIN PRO STRIP SWEEPER BROOMS, 15
$2,428.20
DISPOSABLE GUTTER BROOMS
Invoice 0140129 8/1/2012 PO 24013
Transaction Date 8/22/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$2,428.20
Fund Summary
$61,148.09
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $61,148.09
Total $61,148.09
•
C7
•
-1929-
10100 Wells Fargo
101
GENERAL FUND
$35,967.32
222
AREA FIRE SERVICES
$2,769.85
281
COMMONS DOCKS FUND
($18.65)
285
MOUND HRA
$2,219.83
355
2003 -C G.O. TIF 1 -2
$27.57
375
TIF 1 -3 Debt Service
$27.56
601
WATER FUND
$11,375.55
602
SEWER FUND
$4,193.68
609
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$4,132.23
675
STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
$453.15
$61,148.09
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $61,148.09
Total $61,148.09
•
C7
•
-1929-
Refer 2 AMUNDSON, M. LLP
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -256 Tobacco Products For R TOBACCO PRODUCTS
Invoice 137298 8/16/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -256 Tobacco Products For R TOBACCO PRODUCTS
Invoice 137055 8/15/2012
Transaction Date 8/22/2012 Wells Fargo 10100
$272.50
$545.00
Total $817.50
Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$89.40
Invoice 462223104 8/18/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.00
Invoice 462223104 8/18/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$89.40
Invoice 462222406 8/11/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.00
Invoice 462222406 8/11/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.00
379222709 8/14/2012
• Invoice
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$119.12
Invoice 379222709 8/14/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$36.62
Invoice 387222904 8/16/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.00
Invoice 387222904 8/16/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.00
Invoice 379223408 8121/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$137.64
Invoice 379223408 8/21/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$477.18
Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies
SUPPLIES SACKS, BAGS
$90.55
Invoice 87177000 8/10/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
$108.89
Invoice 87177000 8/10/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
CORCKSCREW, SHOT GLASSES
$50.40
Invoice 87177000 8/10/2012
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
BAGS
$21.35
Invoice 87209700 8117/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$27.60
Invoice 87209700 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
WINE OPENERS
$30.60
Invoice 87209700 8/17/2012
Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$99.00
• Cash
Invoice 87180900 8/13/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$33.00
Invoice 87214900 8/20/2012
-1930-
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$71.40
Invoice 87180900 8/13/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $532.79
Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$211.25
Invoice 74700200 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$3.10
Invoice 74700200 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$1,693.54
Invoice 74765500 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$16.79
Invoice 74765500 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$5,877.54
Invoice 74692400 8/13/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$1,276.50
Invoice 74676300 8/10/2012
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$14.35
Invoice 74676300 8/1012012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$2,653.25
Invoice 74777900 8/20/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo
10100
Total _ $11,746.32 •
Refer 5 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$72.80
Invoice 17503 8/15/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$46.50
Invoice 17504 8/15/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $119.30
Refer 6 COCA COLA BOTTLING - MIDWEST
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COKE PRODUCTS - MIX
$207.60
Invoice 0128051124 8/16/2012
Transaction Date 8/23/2012
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $207.60
Refer 7 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$453.16
Invoice 1032523 8/13/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $453.16
Refer 8 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$1,942.95
Invoice 664878 8/21/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$149.00
Invoice 663516 8/10/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,353.85
Invoice 663768 8/14/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$120.00
Invoice 663877 8/14/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo
10100
-
Total $4,565.80
Refer 9 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA
-1931-
Cash Payment
Invoice 142636
Cash Payment
Invoice 142636
Transaction Date
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
8/13/2012
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
8/13/2012
8/21/2012
WINE
FREIGHT
Wells Fargo 10100
$508.00
$9.00
Total $517.00
Refer 9 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED
_
543549
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$399.00
Invoice 612698
8/15/2012
WINE CREDIT
- $96.00
Transaction Date
8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $399.00
Refer 10 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,584.95
Invoice 1866464
8/14/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
- $20.00
Invoice 010759
8/17/2012
Invoice 543550
812/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$15.50
Invoice 1866465
8/14/2012
- $14.25
Transaction Date
8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $3,580.45
Refer 12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
-$6.26
543549
8/2/2012
• Invoice
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
- $96.00
Invoice 543551
8/2/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
-$9.00
Invoice 543548
8/2/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
- $71.00
Invoice 543550
812/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
- $14.25
Invoice 543860
8/3/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
-$3.41
Invoice 543859
8/312012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
- $10.50
Invoice 543861
8/3/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
-$10.34
Invoice 544640
8/1012012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
-$3.48
Invoice 544641
8/10/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
- $10.00
Invoice 544639
8/10/2012
Transaction Date
8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total - $234.24
Refer 11 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
_
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$32.49
Invoice 1368153
8/15/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$5,328.68
Invoice 1368150
8/15/2012
• Cash
Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$3,245.10
Invoice 1368151
8/15/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$39.25
Invoice 1368152
8/15/2012
-1932-
Invoice 1864452 8/16/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012 Wells F 1933 10100 Total $2,883.31
MOUND, MN
08/23/12 10:19 AM
Page 4
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: August 2012
Cash Payment E 60949750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$533.75
Invoice 1368617 8/16/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$289.50
Invoice 1364426 8/10/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$9,468.77
Refer 13 LUCID BREWING
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER KEG DEPOSIT
$90.00
Invoice 794 8/9/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$90.00
Refer 14 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVCS 8 -2 -12
$318.95
Invoice 27093 8/2/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVCS 8 -6 -12
$54.60
Invoice 27102 8/6/2012
Cash Payment E 60949750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVCS 8 -9 -12
$257.10
Invoice 27118 8/9/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVCS 8 -13 -12
$71.40
Invoice 27251 8/13/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$702.05
Refer 15 MUZAK - MINNEAPOLIS
�.�
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750440 Other Contractual Servic SEPT MUSIC SERVICES
$108.94
•
Invoice AC52240 911/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$108.94
Refer 16 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA
Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$663.00
Invoice 8361939 8/13/2012
Cash Payment E 60949750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$12.50
Invoice 8361939 8/13/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$675.50
Refer 17 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$662.70
Invoice 2287446 8/15/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$343.53
Invoice 2287447 8/15/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$29.95
Invoice 2287448 8/15/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
- $11.03
Invoice 3487555 8/2/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$1,025.15
Refer 18 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,576.00
Invoice 1848194 8/16/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$980.99
Invoice 1848598 8/16/2012
Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$326.32
•
Invoice 1864452 8/16/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012 Wells F 1933 10100 Total $2,883.31
MOUND, MN
08/23/12 10:19 AM
Page 5
Payments
0
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: August 2012
1111:11
g I - 10111110M
Refer 19 ST. CLOUD REFRIGERATION, INC
_
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -404 Machinery /Equip Repairs MTCE COOLING REFRIGERATION-
$315.00
CHANGED AIR FILTERS, CHECKED BELTS,
BLEW OUT CONDENSERS
Invoice 253001 8/8/2012
Transaction Date 8/23/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$315.00
Refer 20 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$173.50
Invoice 707685 8/17/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$112.00
Invoice 707686 8/1712012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$770.00
Invoice 00773764 8110/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,518.30
Invoice 706771 8/14/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$389.00
Invoice 707264 8/15/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$143.90
Invoice 707975 8/21/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,054.81
. Invoice
707976 8/21/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$7,161.51
Refer 21 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC.
_
Cash Payment E609-49750-210 Operating Supplies
REGISTER PAPER ROLLS & RIBBON
$126.63
Invoice 28125 8/13/2012
Transaction Date 8/23/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$126.63
Refer 22 VEEKAY INTERNATIONAL
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R FLASKS, MERCHANDISE
$67.00
Invoice 12 -1373 7/27/2012
Tra n s action Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$67.00
Refer 23 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$258.37
Invoice 0061507 8/16/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$140.00
Invoice 0061507 8/16/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$7.50
Invoice 0061507 8/16/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$405.87
Refer 24 WINE COMPANY
_
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$680.00
Invoice 307001 -00 8/16/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$13.20
Invoice 307001 -00 8/16/2012
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$136.00
306477- 008/9/2012
• Invoice
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$4.20
Invoice 306477 - 008/9/2012
-1934-
MOUND, MN 08/23/1210:19 AM
Page 6
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: August 2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE $52.80
Invoice 306477- 008/9/2012
Tr Date 8/21/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $886.20
Refer 25 WINE MERCHANTS _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,294.00
Invoice 419987 8/15/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,294.00
Refer 26 WIR BE MN BEER
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $6,153.50
Invoice 943169 8/20/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,541.80
Invoice 941072 8/15/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,695.30
Refer 27 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE $1,027.40
Invoice 789588 8/16/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR $1,852.34
Invoice 789587 8/16/2012
Transaction Date 8/21/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,879.74
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$59,966.83
$59,966.83
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $59,966.83
Total $59,966.83
C7
r
IL J
-1935-
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
• August 16, 2012
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in rescheduled regular
session on Thursday, August 16, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall.
Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Councilmembers Dave Osmek, Ray Salazar, and Heidi
Gesch.
Member absent: Kelli Gillespie
Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith,
Finance Director Catherine Pausche, Interim Police Chief Dean Mooney, Jeff Andersen, John
McKinley, John Evans, Janie Skinner, Bruce Larson, Nick Stoiaken, Jason Rice, Brian Berent,
John Hubler, Nancy Swanson, Blaze Fugina, Dan Grady, William Ernst, Lynn Bandt, Stewart
Simon, Gregory Pederson, Ryan Spencer, Kenny Beck, Jim Brandy, Bob Boese, Rose Espiritu,
Mary Berglund, Collette Roberts, Sandy Olstad, Marcia Jerdee, Don Jerdee Sarah Reinhardt,
Shirley Haws, Duane Norberg, Richard Hawks, Dean Fleming, Dean Mooney, Gerald Dodds,
Janet van Osten, Bruce Dodds, Scott Spanjers, Peter Meyer, Kristin and John Beise, Rich
Rogers, Jim and Sally Bedell, Barbara Hudgick- Matson
Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in
nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a
Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent
Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
• 1. Open meeting
Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approve agenda
MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Salazar, approve the agenda as presented. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
4. Consent agenda
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the consent agenda as amended.
Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. MOTION carried.
A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $422,087.14
B. Approve minutes of the July 24, 2012 regular meeting
C. Approve Pay Request No. 4 and Final from Minncomm Utility Construction
Company in the amount of $4,235.71 for work completed on the Island View Dr —
Windsor Rd. Watermain Loop Improvement Project, City Project No. PW -12 -0
D. Approve Pay Request No. 3 from GHM Asphalt Corporation in the amount of
$624,974.05 for work completed on the 2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and
Retaining Wall Improvement Project, City Project Nos. PW- 12 -01, PW — 12 -03,
PW -12 -04
E. Approve Pay Request No. 8 from GMH Asphalt Corporation in the amount of
$208,955.70 for the 2011 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project,
• City Project Nos. PW- 11 -01, PW -11 -02
F. Approve Final Pay Request from Widmer Construction, LLC, in the amount of
ROXIs1
Mound City Council Minutes — August 16, 2012
$1,086.45 for work completed on the Emergency Forcemain repair at Lift Station
P1 (4657 Island View Drive) •
G. Approve Final Payment Request from Precision Sealcoating, Inc, in the amount
$5,745.60 for work completed on the 2012 Crack Seal Coat Project, City Project
No PW -12 -06
H. Approve Three Rivers Park District Winter Trail Activities Permit (Snowmobile
Crossing at Cottonwood Lane)
I. Approve Temporary Sign Permit for 2012 Scarecrow Stomp
J. Approve Labor Agreement between the City of Mound and Law Enforcement
Labor Services, Inc, Local No 35 (Police Supervisors)
5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present oWany item not on the agenda
None were offered.
6. Public Forum on proposed contract for police services W..the City of Orono
A. Mayor's Opening
Mayor Hanus provided opening and introductory remarks for the public forum. He
stated that the objective of the proposed police contract with Orono is to obtain better
service at a lower cost. He also commented that overthe past few years there have
been reductions in City Staff by 18% and that We are leaner and doing more with less.
B. Mound Interim Chief Dean Mooney, Orono Police Chief Correy Farniok,
and Mound Finance Director Catherine Pausche presenting an overview of the
results of shared services study, current City financial status, Council directives, and the
highlights of a draft contract being proposed by Orono •
Interim Police Chief Mooney commented that the police contract proposal is the
culmination of about two years of study and consideration between the City, consultants
and the neighboring cities of Minnetrista and Orono. The impetus for this effort is the
ongoing need to review city services .(at equal. or better levels) at lower costs. This still
remains the goal. Underlying this effort is the'need to right size government and city
services. These are issues under review by all levels of government.
Finance Director Catherine Pausche provided an overview of the financial and budget
issues. City will be embarking on the 2013 budget in upcoming week and we have
been looking at budget initiatives. Pausche provided information about contributing
budget factors:
- Mound lost 39 percent of its tax capacity from 2009 -2013
- State, county and other public agencies have diminishing aid; costs are
being pushed downward
- There have been significant infrastructure improvements since 2000 after
years of neglect; infrastructure improvements also need to continue
- The cost of pay and benefits has risen past inflation in last 10 years
Several cost reductions measures have taken place since 2008:
- Full time staff reduced by 18 percent since 2009
- Staff recently absorbed the Dock Administrator position •
- Employees accepted a zero percent increase in 2011
-1937-
Mound City Councii Minutes —August 16, 2012
Refinanced bonds and minimalized capital expenditures
• - Deferral of equipment needs, where possible
Flexing of public works shifts to minimize and save overtime
- Created insurance task force to create savings on health insurance premiums
Pausche commented that increased collaboration with other units of governments is a
natural extension of these efforts. It was noted that Mound currently provides similar
shared services for fire to adjacent communities.
Interim Chief Mooney summarized the Police /Fire Consultant Study and Proposal
- Process involved 2 years of study /negotiations
- Current positioned vacancies maintained.to allow for consolidation
- Potential savings of $200K
- Proposed contract will allow us to join with another agency without reducing
police department staff
- Savings come from economies: of scale
- More administrative efficiency
- Scheduling flexibility
- Program administration maintained
- Supervisory coverage
- Support services improved
- Expanded career development/promo opportunities available in a larger
department
• Mooney summarized the directives from Mayor and City Council for the police contract
proposal
Must have significant savings which means 10 percent or more
Police services' levels..and programs must be maintained
Mound Officers.must be treated fairly in the process
Mooney commented that he has never served with a finer group of officers in his
professional career and that in the, previous proposal and discussions with Minnetrista
there were key elementsfor Mound that could not be achieved.
Mooney commented that Orono's proposal would provide police services to the City of
Mound that meets the needs and conditions set by Mound. The proposed Orono police
contract is for 10 years. The cost to Mound is known for next five years. Proposed
contract amount is $1:545M for year 1 and includes a cap. There would be a 2.5%
increase for years 2 to 5, and 1 to 5 percent increase for years 6 to 10 that is tied to the
Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Mooney introduced Orono Police Chief Correy Farniok to the Council, Staff, audience
members and provided an overview of Chief Farniok's background and experience.
Chief Farniok provided a summary of Orono's proposal including a framework of
positions. He commented that the proposal provides for 3 officers on duty 24/7 and for
• supervisory coverage 20 hours a day.
-1938-
Mound City Council Minutes — August 16, 2012
Mooney explained that under Orono's proposal all Mound Officers would be hired by
Orono with exception of Officer Sepanet who is filling in for the position formerly held by •
John McKinley. Mooney summarized some of the key points of Orono's proposal:
- Nearly all officers at current rank and assignment are maintained
- Credit for seniority
- No probation. Chief mentioned that this was one of the main sticking points
with earlier discussions with Minnetrista
- Police records system would be integrated and upgraded
- Key programs are maintained. He mentioned DTF /SRO /DARE /Crime Free
Housing /Police Reserve /Human Resource (ie, Sojourn, etc.)
- Mound will be part of the Police Advisory Board Membership
- -Mound Fire Department uses a� si nilar,model
-- Encourages input for department decisioh,paking
- -Gives each contract city 4_.v * in operations and policy
(resource allocation, special "events, capital expenditure, etc.)
Orono's proposal provides for a police precinct station in Mound. This
maintains face to face customer service and is locally based in Mound which
has been Mound's practice for years
Mooney outlined the anticipated transitional costs related to the proposal:
- Equipment transfer (Mound marked and unmarked cars to Orono)
- ERU equipment to Orono •
- Computers and work station (both in squad cars and building) to Orono
- Records conversion
- Personnel cost adjustments
- Uniform changes
- Squad car modifications
- Standardizing firearms
- Training
- Expanded Orono locker room to accommodate Mound officers in Orono
locale
Mooney stated that transitional costs are estimate not to exceed $80K.
Interim Chief Mooney summarized that the partnership with the Orono is an opportunity
to maintain or enhance our current high level of Police Service with significant savings to
the City of Mound.
C. Members of Mound's Police Patrol Union LELS Local No. 266 to provide
feedback on the proposed contract for police services provided by the City of •
Orono
igxN
Mound City Council Minutes —August 16, 2012
• Mound Officer Dan Niccum commented that he grew up in Mound and that his mother and
grandmother were police matrons in Mound. He started with the Mound PD in the 1980s as a
police reserve and wanted to have a career here. He stated that Mound's best option is to go
Orono since maintaining the current department doesn't work.
Mound Officer Jamie Wittke stated that she has served in the Mound PD since 1999. She
commented that Mound's officers have been in limbo for 2 years and that they know ultimately
Mound's department will go away. She has supported the Orono police proposal since the start
and that Mound will still be here. She also commented that she also supported previous talks
with Minnetrista even when her job was in jeopardy.
City Manager Kandis Hanson stated that Mound Officer Jamie Wittke will be part of a KARE 11
news story later today.
Mound Officer Amy Swanson stated that has been with the Mound Police Department for 21
years. She commented that the last 2 years have been trying and a long frustrating process.
She shared that several officers have dedicated their careers to the Mound Police Department
and stated it is tough and emotional matter. She.hopes that the decision will involve the citizens
of Mound.
D. Mayor's comments and invitation to the audience to step forward and provide comments
and opinions or ask questions regarding the proposed contract for police services
provided by the City of Orono.
• Mayor Hanus indicated that we are here to hear from the community and what it has to say
about the police service proposal. He commented that the Council does not intend to make a
decision tonight. Mayor asked if there were any questions from members of the City Council
before starting the public forum portion of the meeting.
Ray Salazar asked Chief Famiok about scheduling that was to include 3 officers and 1 sergeant
at all times iVas foi Motand or for all cities. Chief Famiok responded that 3 officers would be
duty from. 0700 -1500 for Mound /Navarre /Spring Park; from 1500 -0300 4 patrol officers and 1
sergeant would be on duty; from 0300 -0700 3 officers would be on duty. There would be 1
Patrol Officer to be assigned to a shift, as. needed.
Jerry Dodds, 6144 Beachwood Road, asked Chief Farniok if 3 officers are for Mound or for
Orono's service areas which include Spring Park, Navarre and Minnetonka. Chief Farniok
commented that he was referring to the service area.
Mooney stated that Mound always has an officer on duty. However, there are always times
when that officer provides assistance to others and vise versa. This is a cooperative agreement.
Jerry Dodds asked if there are outs if we don't like the contract. Mayor Hanus indicated that
there are performance measures in the contract.
Bob Boese, 2620 Setter Circle, asked about Orono's current contract for police officers. Chief
Farniok responded that Orono currently has two patrol officers for contracted cities. Mr. Boese
asked about the number of additional square miles added for Mound. City Manager Hanson
. responded that the additional area is approximately three square miles.
-1940-
Mound City Council Minutes — August 16, 2012
Council member Gesch asked Mooney about an earlier slide that was shown as part of Staff's
presentation which showed 20 supervisory hours and where Mound currently is at. Mooney •
stated there are about 16 supervisory hours, however this doesn't account for their days off.
He stated that the proposed Orono contract would "up" the current levels.
John McKinley, 5948 Hillcrest Road, stated that he has the utmost of respect for the Orono
Police Chief and for Orono's police officers. He talked about the service levels needed for the
police department and stated that no one can guarantee that there will be an officer in Mound
and it's possible for no officer to be here. He stated that this plan falls short of maintaining
current levels. There are also many people on both sides of this issue many of which are not
here this evening. He commented that this is much too important of an issue not to put to a vote
to the citizens of Mound.
Mayor Hanus commented that the contract states that, Orono must provide the same level of
services that we currently have. Mr. McKinley stated that the Orono proposed contract doesn't
state what the current level of service is in Mound:
Nick Stoiaken, 4948 Bartlett Boulevard, asked if we have to get rid of the,police department.
Mayor Hanus responded we don't have to eliminate the department however, in order to keep it,
we would have to raise taxes. Mr. Stoiaken asked" if the problem was the high . salaries of our
employees. Stoiaken stated that the City's salary for its employees is causing Mound to lose its
police department. Mayor Hanus commented that employee salaries are not part of this agenda
item. Stoiaken asked when his information could be presented. Staff indicated this item could be
discussed as part of the City's 2013 budget discussions. Stoiaken asked for a specific date and
Finance Director Pausche indicated that Aug. 28 would be the date and that he could present
information as part of the three minute public comment period. •
Peter Meyer, 5748 Sunset Road, stated he would like to have his Police Department
accountable to his City Council members. He feels strong local government is the keystone, the
foundation of our community's freedom. He has nothing against Orono's police department, but
if it costs him a few more dollars, his freedom is much more important. He thinks we need to
look at more than justthe dollar costs. Hanes statedlhat the Council doesn't have control of the
Police Department, but most control is by state statute.
John Evans, 2025 Arbor Lane, stated that consolidation from an economic standpoint makes
sense and thinks we should give it a shot.
Spring Park Mayor Sarah Reinhardt stated that City Manager Hanson invited her to attend the
meeting to share their experiences having Orono provide police services to their City. Mayor
Reinhardt stated Spring Park has been with Orono for years and their officers and staff are
community minded and professional. Orono is very responsive to their needs and Spring Park
is proud to call them their police department. It was noted that Orono has excellent response
time. She also mentioned that they tend to erase the community service boundaries and
understand that Orono is in the area. She stated that Police Commission meetings are
quarterly and that Chief Farniok is always available and very responsive.
Don Jerde, 2521 Lakewood Lane, stated that the Council has given a lot of thought to the
situation especially with regard to the cost. He questioned if we have asked ourselves "what if
this doesn't work and what would be the cost to reinstate the police department." He also
stated that there has been talk about moving City Hall to the Public Safety building and if this is •
-1941-
Mound City Council Minutes —August 16, 2012
the case it would be virtually impossible to reinstate the police department in the future. He
• believes keeping our police department is needed.
Jeff Andersen, 2206 Commerce Boulevard, asked if the bottom line was saving money.
Mayor Hanus stated his statement was accurate but also mentioned maintaining service. Mr.
Andersen stated that if saving $200K was the impetus, why are we then not listening to citizens
who want to help the City save money. He commented that the individual who previously
wanted to talk about salaries should be allowed to speak as it was about alternatives to save
money and that all ideas should be discussed. Mayor stated he is duty bound to maintain the
focus of the meeting. If other discussions and topics are also to be included, we will not get
anywhere.
John Hubler, 5448 Breezy Road, stated that have been a lot changes in Mound and that they
have been good. The police department existed for 83 years. He has been a Mound resident
for 28 years. He has supported police department budget increases and decreases. He stated
that information that was prepared and disseminated:by Mound management and staff is
slanted. Hubler wanted to know about the responsd' "time; also about'actual cost of the future
years. He stated we cannot control overhead costs. Hubler suggested looking at some new
ideas and examples. We could eliminate one salary of $92K and not replace the chief. Also
could consider creating a new Public Safety Officer. position. He also suggested hiring an
unbiased auditor and also suggested having a few community volunteers to audit future City
department reports. Hubler commented that are some talented baby boomers in our community
who are retired and could help the Council. He asked if the citizens are going to be allowed to
vote on the police department contract. He suggested taking the pressure off the Council and
put the question on a ballot. He asked what is next, the Mound Fire Department or outsourcing
• of City staff.
Dave Osmek asked about the creation of a Public Safety Officer position that would merge the
positions of the Police Chief and Fire Chief and whether you would be able to find a person with
those credentials Hubler indicated that there are such positions and that the City may have to
pay more, however, the credentials maybe would allow for a higher salary. Osmek asked for
examples and asked they be provided, if available. Hubler stated he would provide the
information and also commented that he is interested in discussions about salary/budget.
Hubler asked Mooney if all officers agree with the proposal and if they have 100 percent
support. Mooney, that Mound officers are free to express their opinion for their benefit.
Finance Department Director Pausche stated that with the current proposal we are sharing a
police chief and commented that there are benefits of economics of scale and opportunities for
our officers. She stated we need to give this a chance to work and requested the community
remain open. Our work is not done beyond the police department discussions for budgeting
purposes. Pension, health care, and union negotiations continue to be unknown variables.
Mr. McKinley stated that once the police department is gone, the streets and public works
departments will be next. The City has seven department heads. City Manager Hanson
stated that there is not nor has there been a plan to outsource public works. However, the City
has previously have looked at sharing storage space.
Mayor Hanus talked about some of the incentives programs offered in recent years to try to
encourage individuals at the top to retire early in order to save money as well as continuing our
• efforts to do more with less.
-1942-
Mound City Council Minutes — August 16, 2012
Mayor Hanus called a recess at 8:50 p.m. to allow for tape change, and reconvened the
meeting at 9:08 p.m. •
Amy Swanson, who is an officer with the Mound Police Department, summarized what she
heard tonight which is the citizens would like an opportunity to vote and the decision should be
left to them. She stated she has deep respect for Orono and its Police Department, however,
the citizens should be heard.
Mayor Hanus stated that Orono's intent is to divide their area into precincts so as to provide
high levels of service which was confirmed by Chief Farniok.
Richard Hawks — 2636 Setter Circle, stated he has lived in Mound for 38 years. He asked what
is the hurry to do this and why have the citizens been kept in the dark? He stated that we are
going to spend $2.5M to save $200K and that he would he,willing to contribute $50 a month in
taxes to keep the police department. The Mound Police Department is a winning department
and always has been. Hanus talked about the savings with the proposal. The present PD costs
$1.8M . Orono would be paid $1.5M with the proposed contract.
Mayor Hanus responded to Hawks' question about why hurry to do this. Hanus commented that
we have been talking about this for 2 years. One of the reasons about moving now and getting
it in the 2013 budget is that if we don't we will have to round r out our PD which'will require
additional money. Also, once the department is rounded out, it is not favorable for contract
discussions.
City Manager Kandis Hanson indicated all along it was her preference to have communication
along the way, however, it needed to be amenable to both parties. Contract information was •
included in both the Laker and Lakeshore Weekly and included interviews. A Q&A was prepared
by administrative and management staff and was included in the recent edition of the City
Contact. The purpose of the Q&A was to provide available information and respond to
questions that we were hearing. Mayor Hanus clarified that we were providing information
that was correct and that projects are rolled out when they are developed.
Shirley Hawks, 2636 Setter Circle; stated that we -have to pay to incarcerate prisoners which we
always have done. The Mound Police: Department is a 24/7 department. We are always on
duty which attributes to budget and mope staff. It was mentioned that you are not looking at
public works however the parks department was discussed a few years ago. Osmek
commented that mowing responsibilities including part time parks department personnel, was
discussed a few years ago.
Ms. Hawks further commented that she has full respect for the Orono Police Department. If
Mound Police Department and Orono starts patrol in 2012, it will be hiring ten PD Staff.
However, one employee is not included at all. Mound is a city with a substantial business
district, 3 banks, and is an island. In 2011 over 19,000 calls for service were done. She also
provided some additional service statistics from 2011. She stated her position has not been
mentioned after 35 years in the Mound PD and that she has not been approached by the City
Manager. She also mentioned several of the duties of the Mound Police Department and
administrative staff. Her position was completely overlooked.
Kandis Hanson commented that you cannot make announcements before information is
available and that Mooney has visited with Ms. Hawks. Ms. Hawks stated that she is not fit in •
this equation and also mentioned PERA. Mooney added that there have been discussions
-1943-
Mound City Council Minutes — August 16, 2012
about possible scenarios but that he was not in any position to make promises or commitments.
• He stated that we are here tonight to try and resolve the ambiguities for the Mound Police
Department personnel.
Nancy Swanson, 4941 Gumwood Road. Ms. Anderson would prefer to keep our department
and has great respect for Chief Farniok and the Orono department. She asked if it is time to
consolidate with another City. She listened to earlier comments from Finance Director Pausche
and asked if this going to be enough to keep this City going for the duration of the PD contract
proposal. If we are that bad off, this is a temporary fix and we need to look at the whole picture.
She asked if we should wait a year and look at consolidation.
Mayor stated we are not in dire straits. We are doing what we have been doing which is
operating better, doing more and for less cost. Again, we are not in dire straits and talked about
why we want to do it this year. If we don't, we will have to make the police department whole
and it makes it much more difficult to do.
It was discussed that these discussions will continue which is what we have been doing over the
past two years.
City Manager Hanson mentioned that she has prepared a statement and believes this is the
appropriate time to present it. The prepared statement "The Right Sizing of Mound" was read
by Hanson.
John McKinley asked about an earlier comment from Mayor Hanus about assignment of
officers. Chief Farniok stated that the service boundaries are a work in progress and for the
• majority of the time there will be two cars in the "southern area" which includes Navarre, Spring
Park, Minnetonka Beach and Mound.
John Hubler stated he wished we had options and. complimented City Manager Hanson about
how the Public Safety Building project was layed out years ago which included options. She
commented -that employees are'' ot allowed to speak freely which is not fair. He asked Mooney
if Staff was included 'in the process.
City Manager Hanson stated that we provide correct information to our staff so it can be
disseminated. However, rurhor dissemination is discouraged.
Kris Williams, 5944 Hillscrest Road, stated that when her father couldn't breathe, she called 911
and the police arrived within 2 -3 minutes. She had a similar experience with an emergency call
for her mother.
The public comment /forum portion of the meeting was closed at 9:46.
E. Review /Discussion by Mound City Council Members on the proposed
Contract for Police Services by the City of Orono, with any further direction
to be provided to staff.
Mayor Hanus asked for questions from the Council.
Council member Salazar asked about page 1876 in the agenda packet about finding funding
. referenced in the contract. Chief Farniok stated that both departments would have a member in
the task force for funding.
-1944-
Mound City Council Minutes —August 16, 2012
Council member Osmek stated he had skeptism with the Minnetrista proposal and has healthy •
level with the Orono proposal as well. He also stated that salaries would be part of future
discussions. Osmek requested some additional information and suggested a Gantt chart that
shows the Orono and Mound Department for a typical time period and also what the proposal
would do . He agreed with John McKinley's comments that Mound's current performance
standards need to be clarified, especially for severability clauses and provisions in the contract.
These performance measures need to be included and needs to be clear.
Osmek stated that as part of the preliminary budget we could project a "full compliment" and
can always go down from there. He asked about a referendum; and whether it can be included
as part of the November general election. The question needs,"
eedsto be asked. Osmek also
commented that he wanted everyone to know that we are; not' 'Stockton, California and that
Mound is not going bankrupt. He further commented thOMoupd received a favorable bond
rating for its recent bond refinance. This is an effort to look at an opportunity for service at a
lower cost.
Mayor Hanus commented that he does not believe there is time to get it on, the ballot and that it
would be good to know. He stated that the City is in good condition and referenced the annual
audit report which includes comments about sound financial information, sound management
and encouraged people to read it. He stated that we can raise taxes and that ''maintaining
current tax levels is hard.
Osmek stated that he does not want a referendum on a special election and if this is not able to
be done this fall, it is not an option. He asked If we were to wait until after the election and
could be voted by the citizens, if we would be able to meet the contract obligations. Chief •
Mooney stated this was not likely.
Council member Gesch stated that we have a great police department who would be a part of
the Orono police department. She stated that they won't be any different than who they are now
and that they will still be award winning'officers. It was stated by many people that both the
Orono Chief and Police Department are excellent.
Council member Salazar stated that he was not on committee and that he is here to listen to the
service proposal discussion as - well. He stated that there is a lot of emotion here tonight as
expected and anticipated and that his job as Council member is to take out the emotion and
look at it from a business perspective; what is best for the City. He stated that he has been in
Mound for 20 years and wants what is best for our town both now and the future. This proposal
provides advancement opportunities for our officers and officer retention and maintains good
officers. He stated that he feels this is a good option, however, more time is needed to evaluate
where we are going for 2013. He stated a referendum would be good if there is time, which
there may not be.
Mayor Hanus stated that what is being proposed is not new or exclusive to Mound. He also
wanted to clarify that his job as Mayor is to maintain the meeting and keep it on topic. He
extended his regrets to the individual who spoke earlier and wanted to discuss employee salary
information and that the individual will have the opportunity to be heard at a future Council
meeting, which is probably Aug. 28
•
-1945-
Mound City Council Minutes —August 16, 2012
Nancy Swanson indicated that she was someone concerned that it was just stated that we are
. not in dire straits and if that is the case, we should have been adequately funding the police
department and also stated that she was concerned about officer well being.
7. Information /Miscellaneous
A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager - None
B. Minutes: None
C. Reports: Fire Commission Meeting: July 25, 2012
D. Correspondence: Mediacom letter: July 30, 2012
8. Adiourn
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to adjourn at 1010 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
Mayor Mark Hanus
Attest: Minutes submitted by Sarah Smith
•
KI
-1946-
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472 -0604
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Date: August 23, 2012
Re: August 28, 2012 City Council Consent Agenda Item — Amendment to Approved
Temporary Sign Permit for 2012 Scarecrow Stomp Event
SUMMARY. At its August 16, 2012 meeting, the Council approved the temporary sign permit
application submitted by Robin Baumgartner, on behalf of Celebrate Greater Mound, to allow
placement of two (2) banners to be up for a 30-day period to promote the 2012 Scarecrow
Stomp and waiver of the $25.00 fee. On August 20, 2012, the applicant submitted a request
for permission to install one (1) additional banner on private property near the intersection of
County Road 110 and County Road 44 for 30 -days.
RECOMMENDATION. City staff recommends that the City Council approve the requested •
amendment to the temporary sign permit and fee waiver for the 2012 Scarecrow Stomp
event subject to the following conditions:
1. The banner is removed immediately following the event.
2. The applicant obtain permission from the property owner prior to banner
installation.
3. No signage shall be placed in the Hennepin County Road ROW unless permission
by the applicant has been obtained.
U
-1947-
Sarah Smith
From: Sarah Smith
• Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 8:44 AM
To: Sarah Smith
Subject: FW: memosignordinancescarecrowstomp20l2 .doc
From: Robin Baumgartner [mailto• robin bctcorporation.coml
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 10:35 AM
To: Sarah Smith
Subject: Re: memosignordinancescarecrowstomp20l2 .doc
Hi Sarah,
Is there a form for this or will this email suffice? I'd like to:
2. Request amendment to approved temporary sign permit and include on upcoming 8/28 Council agenda to add
additional banner and fee waiver.
This would be for a private yard off 44 and 110. Let me know if I need to complete another form.
•
-1948-
1
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472 -0604
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Date: August 23, 2012
Re: Proposed amendments to City Code Chapter 119 (signage)
SUMMARY. Staff is recommending approval of 3 minor amendments to City Code Chapter
119 (signage) to extend the timelines for temporary banners from 15 days to 30 days and
from 10 days to 30 days for portable signs; also to allow for administrative approval for
portable sign placement on public property. Portable sign use is allowed only for
governmental or quasi - public functions.
U
As the Council is aware, often we often receive requests to extend these time periods
especially for special events such as the OLL Incredible Festival, the MFD Fish Fry, the Spirit of
the Lakes Festival, etc. Staff's position is that extending the time periods for temporary •
signage to 30 days and allowing for administrative approval of portable signs on public
property will reduce the number of special requests for temporary signage.
RECOMMENDATION. A draft ordinance has been prepared for review and consideration by
the Council. Staff recommends approval subject to any comments from the City Council and
Staff.
•
-1949-
CITY OF MOUND
. ORDINANCE NO. _ -2012
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 119 AS IT RELATES TO SIGN
REGULATIONS
The City of Mound does ordain:
Section 119 -4 (i) (3) of the Mound City Code is hereby amended as follows:
(3) Temporary banners and pennants employed for grand openings of business
establishments, special events or promotions and holidays are not exempt from
permits and fees and shall be removed within 45 30 days upon permit issuance
unless an alternate schedule is approved by the City Council. Temporary
banners and pennants are prohibited from being placed upon any decorative
fencing unless the banner or pennant is used in conjunction with a government, a
quasi - public function, or similar - related special event. Permits for banners and
pennants can be issued no more than four times per calendar year.
Section 119 -4 Q) (2) of the Mound City Code is hereby amended as follows:
(j) Except as may be specifically authorized by this subsection and subsection (i) of this
subsection, portable signs are prohibited. A portable sign for the purpose of directing the public
• may be permitted under the following conditions:
(2) The period of said sign use shall not exceed tee- th consecutive days;
Section 119 -4 (j) (4) (a) of the Mound City Code is hereby amended as follows:
0) Except as may be specifically authorized by this subsection and subsection (i) of this
subsection, portable signs are prohibited. A portable sign for the purpose of directing the public
may be permitted under the following conditions:
(4) The signs shall be placed on the premises of the advertised event; and /or on
such other premises following approval of a temporary sign permit by the city.
Administrative approval of a portable sign is permitted if the following conditions
are met:
a. F. The applicant obtain
permission from the City Manager for placement of the sign on public
propert y
•
-1950-
Section 119 -4 Q) (4) (d) (4) of the Mound City Code is hereby amended as follows: •
0) Except as may be specifically authorized by this subsection and subsection (i) of this
subsection, portable signs are prohibited. A portable sign for the purpose of directing the public
may be permitted under the following conditions:
(4) The signs shall be placed on the premises of the advertised event; and /or on
such other premises following approval of a temporary sign permit by the city.
Administrative approval of a portable sign is permitted if the following conditions
are met:
(d) The proposed location of the sign is reviewed and deemed acceptable
by city staff, which shall include the police, planning and engineering
departments, based on the following criteria:
Adopted by the City Council this 28 day of August, 2012
Mayor Mark Hanus
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk •
Published in The Laker the day of , 2012
Effective the _ day of , 2012.
•
-1951-
CITY OF MOUND
• RESOLUTION NO. 12 -_
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ON
2011 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT —
HIGHLAND AREA (MSA ROUTE)
WHEREAS, a contract has been let for the 2011 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement
Project — Highland Area, and the construction cost for such improvement is $695,000, and the
expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount is $190,000 so
that the total cost of the improvement will be $885,000.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to
be $595,000 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property
owners is declared to be $290,000.
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of
fifteen (15) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday
in January, 2013, and shall bear interest at the rate of five (5) percent per annum from
the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the Consulting Engineer, shall forthwith calculate
• the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every
assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in
her office for public inspection.
4. The Clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council
thereof.
Adopted by the City Council this 28 day of August, 2012.
Mayor Mark Hanus
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
•
-1952-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 12- •
RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR
2011 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT —
HIGHLAND AREA (MSA ROUTE)
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on August 28, 2012, the City Clerk was
directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the 2011 Street, Utility and Retaining
Wall Improvement Project — Highland Area,
AND WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been
completed and filed in her office for public inspection,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 25 day of September, 2012, in the council chambers of
city hall, at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and
place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an
opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed
assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to
the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She
shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the
assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. •
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property,
with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Mound, except that no
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid with 30 days from the adoption
of the assessment. The property owner may at any time thereafter, pay to the City of
Mound the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31S of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be
made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31S of the
succeeding year.
Adopted by the City Council this 28 day of August, 2012.
Mayor Mark Hanus
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
U
-1953-
CITY OF MOUND
• RESOLUTION NO. 12-
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ON
2011 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT —
SW ISLAND AREA
WHEREAS, a contract has been let for the 2011 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement
Project — SW Island Area, and the construction cost for such improvement is $1,550,000, and
the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount is $410,000
so that the total cost of the improvement will be $1,960,000.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to
be $765,000 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property
owners is declared to be $1,195,000.
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of
fifteen (15) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday
in January, 2013, and shall bear interest at the rate of five (5) percent per annum from
the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the Consulting Engineer, shall forthwith calculate
is the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every
assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in
her office for public inspection.
4. The Clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council
thereof.
Adopted by the City Council this 28 day of August, 2012.
Mayor Mark Hanus
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
•
-1954-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 12- •
RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR
2011 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT —
SW ISLAND AREA
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on August 28, 2012, the City Clerk was
directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the 2011 Street, Utility and Retaining
Wall Improvement Project — SW Island Area,
AND WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been
completed and filed in her office for public inspection,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 25 day of September, 2012, in the council chambers of
city hall, at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and
place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an
opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed
assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to
the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She
shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the
assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. •
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property,
with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Mound, except that no
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid with 30 days from the adoption
of the assessment. The property owner may at any time thereafter, pay to the City of
Mound the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31S of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be
made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the
succeeding year.
Adopted by the City Council this 28 day of August, 2012.
Mayor Mark Hanus
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
•
-1955-
C7
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 23, 2012
To: City Mayor and City Council
From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Treasurer
Re: Supervisor Compensation
On July 24, 2012 the Mound City Council approved an Early Retirement Incentive Plan for
salaried employees. Eligible employees have until September 7 to decide if they would like to
participate in the plan.
The City continues to investigate opportunities for savings in response to the economic downturn
and the commitment to provide services as efficiently and cost effectively as possible. With the
is public questioning City supervisors' salaries, there is an obligation to evaluate compensation
levels.
The Mayor has requested the following information which has been included in this packet:
Exhibit A. A chart showing all supervisory compensation for the past four years based
on the gross earnings, incorporating relative measurements such as job evaluation rating
points, exempt status, qualifications and scope of responsibility /expenses under
management.
• Exhibit B. External comparison data for our department head positions using cities of
similar profile, including comparable services and infrastructure needs, and showing
where Mound positions fall within the range.
• Exhibit C. Identify resources available for analyzing the compensation levels of
municipal employees (State Job Match System, Professional Organization Salary
Information Guides /Surveys, RFP for Employee Classification and Compensation Study).
Staff requests that the Council consider this data and determine next steps, including how the
Council and/or Personnel Committee is to be involved and the timing of any study and/or
• recommendations.
-1956-
r�
•
•
O
N
l+ N C
O1
O O
CL U a
O
m
N
N
N
Ln
N
0
M
N
N
O
to
0
m u
N
N
N
N
01
CY
N
N
N
N
M
n
M
w
M
N
In
O
N
N
N
N
[t
00
N
M
N
M
N
N x
O
l0
l0
l0
N
M
N
In
tD
lD
M
O
O
0)
01
O
01
01
00
1l-
00
N
0)
Ol
I
N
N
0]
M
N
a1
N
N
1
N
in
M
-4
N
N
�q
y h
N
N
w
N
N
In
M
M
Ln
N
t!')
O
14
K
M
01
to
N
to
w
N
O
N
C)
N
O
O
O
Nt
N
N
lD
tD
M
N
V1
L
N (7
r-I
01
01
Ol
01
00
I
00
V1
01
00
00
00
C
01
M
00
N
N
rl
M
O
w
In
M
In
00
w
a
0 h
n
M
--1
1n
N
L
V1
00
-t
O
M
Itt
O
n
O LO
O
Cf
tG
N
W
10
'I
Iq
ct
M
P
l0
t0
I�
it
N Vr
ti
01
00
M
M
00
1
00
Ln
O1
0)
00
00
00
C
L
u
C
•C
Ln
O1
N
O
O1
1
-*
N
M
O
O)
0)
M
01
O
to
.Zr '
ct
cn
N
-'
O
0)
N
14
r�
V1
tr
N
O
'
(a
Q
01
O In
n
-t
rl
lC
N
In
01
N
N
n
-4
M
Cr
In
O
m
0)
p LO
(D
l0
O
N
lD
l0
lD
e-I
N
01
l0
N
lD
lD
L
C
N (r)
eri
0)
00
m
0)
00
00
00
Ln
00
01
01
00
00
L
L
>
ar
00
u
01
N
00
01
N
•-I
W
V)
N
Ln
rl
0)
1
In
Y
C
c
'O
O 0
n
00
M
1-
-t
O
00
n
00
N
00
O
�
N
N L
O
w
Ln
LD
f�
f�
O
01
)D
00
n
00
N
o
w
C
`m
�
(n
�
0)
0)
00
00
00
a
00
cn
0i
00
00
r
m
w
.
CL
,,
m
a
h
O
to
c
°•
O
a
L O
m
c
p
�
a
Q
r
>
>
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
z
z
z
(A
m
�
T
X w
o
�
v
o.
L
E o
L U
0)
L
O
L
i
r
z
r
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
r
z
r
z
(U
a,
.r
>
y
E
O
OJ
O
C m
L Ct
N
C).
C
N
n
?
U
0
cu
r
r
>
>
r
r
z
r
z
z
r
z
r
>-
o
v
m
c
O
V
>
y
m
z
L
C O)
Ol
N
01
00
to
N
w
01
m
-q
Ln
m
:;-
C
C
m
0)
fl
01
O
00
M
N
O
O
w
00
a
m
U
h
N
M
W
N
00
N
n
O
00
E
O
v1 E
Lr
ri
-IF
N
1
1
O)
E
L CU O oo c
_u
v
CL
m
i
N v
CL
v
m
m
O X
N
m
C
E
N W
O
L
O
E
O w cu
N
4--
O
3
-0
y ti
o m
l0
t0
t0
l0
l0
tD
l0
lD
l0
w
W
O
d
RT
O
v
m
p
m
O"
C
m c
O G m
O
N
C
C
w
4)
0
>
O
r a
m
E
o
t
�o
y
w
CU
O)
>
L
L
O
m
C
m
O
>
• U
C
w
L
o
C
d
L
a�
L
on
N
O
>_
O
L
�i
N
00
G
L
Q:
D
•@
U
tJ
o
a
o
`
m
m
L
a
`
r-
o
n
O
C
L
0
d
0�
L
O
to
Y
v1
Y
v!
Y
N
N
N
N
�-1
N
m
O
L
_
Z
L
y
��
°
L
3
L
3
L
3
L
L
r
u=
.
V)
I
c
QJ
E
U
U
U
)
o
2
_�
�?
n
.�
V
C
C
E
O
7
O
m
U
w
0)
u
N
u
(J
u
W
u
y
u
O
m
O
O_
u
U
N
Ail
U
U
ii
U
a
a
a
'2
a
a
a
a
Z>
a
-1957-
•
•
.S
• O
E
a�
c
a
L
0
•
0
E
m
o
.r
a,
�+
0
X
i
W
m
L-
eo
0
E
1
E
w
°'
N
7
�
H
�
C O
L
N
m
m
'~
m
N
O
GJ
V
p
.
N
L
'C
G1
m
N
a
L
E
E
O
N
U
0
eo
p
m
L
N
a
L-
0
U_
d
.0
a
W
m
L
to
• O
E
.
0
O
E
L
0
t
N
.
C
co
O
C
O
O
t
v
N
m
U
v
s
N
- luotS-
w
on
co
a
E
0
v�
H
�
�+
O
V
p
�
Q
L
�
eo
E
1
E
w
°'
N
7
�
H
�
v
m
'~
m
C
O
v
N
p
.
N
v
'C
au
m
L
a
0
E
3
O
N
U
�
eo
v
m
N
N
�
d
�
O
W
Z
.
0
O
E
L
0
t
N
.
C
co
O
C
O
O
t
v
N
m
U
v
s
N
- luotS-
Municipali
Go en Val My
Pop-
ulation Organization's ♦
20312 City Manager
Rank
1
Maximum
.. •
136,797.00 City Counci
ot MR
Avg
Hopkins
17290 City Manager
2
129,761.00
City Counci
2
Hugo
13140 City A ministrator
3
125,399.00
City Council
Finance Director/Treas
Robbinsdale
13775 City Manager
4
124,217.60
City Council
9787
Rosemount
21521 City Administrator
5
123,589.00
City Council
Rosemount
Anoka
17966 City Manager
6
122,824.00
Mayor, City Council
Shorewood
7618 City C er Administrator
7
122,637.00
City Counci
City Manager
St. Anthony Vi 11age
Orono
8437 City Manager
7980 City Administrator
9
10
112,535.00
110,252.00
City Council
Council
99,798.40
Mendota Heights
11766 City Administrator
11
108,794.00
City Council
8
New Hope
20718 City Manager 1
12
108,086.00
City Council
Finance Director
Rogers
7497 City A ministrator 1
13 1
106,308.80 ICity
Council Mayor
11766
Average: 118,609.95
Golden Valley
20312
Finance Director
1
118,639.00
City Manager
131%
New Hope
20718
Finance Director (AEM)
2
113,500.00
City Manager
Shorewood
7618
Finance Director/Treas
3
107,628.00
City Administrator
Mound
9787
Finance' Director/Tceas
, : x104,4
,4 00 '
Gty k Mage►
104%
Rosemount
21521
Finance Director
5
104,188.00
City Administrator
Anoka
17966
Finance Director
6
102,918.40
City Manager
Ro binsdale
13775
Finance IT Director
7
99,798.40
City Manager
Hugo
13140
Finance Director
8
99,081.00
City Administrator
Hopkins
17290
Finance Director
9
96,656.00
City Manager
Mendota Heights
11766
Finance Director
10
93,813.00
City Administrator
Orono
7980
Finance Director
it
93,025.00
City Administrator
Rogers
7497
Finance Director/Treas
12
91,686.41
City Administrator
St. Anthony Village
8437
Finance Director
13
83,860.00
City Manager
Average: 100,714.40
Mouha.: `9787
City Clerk , ,:;
1, f ;"
` 96,222 00'
G_V Manager - ,-
131%
Robbinsdale
13775
Dir of Admin & Rec
Svc /Clerk
2
91,769.00
City Manager
Rogers
7497
Asst. City
Administrator /Clerk
3
91,686.41
City Administrator
New Hope
20718
City Clerk
4
78,790.40
City Manager
Golden Valley
20312
Finance Director performs
Clerk Duties /Elections
Shorewood
7618
Deputy City Clerk /Exec
Secretary
5
77,746.00
City Administrator
Hugo
13140
City Clerk
6
69,587.00
City Administrator
Rosemount
21521
City Clerk
7
67,485.00
Assist City Admin
Hopkins
17290
City Clerk
8
66,394.00
Assist City Mgr
Orono
7980
City Clerk
9
65,253.00
Adminisator
Anoka
17966
City Clerk
10
63,252.80
City Manager
Mendota Heights
11766
City Clerk
11
57,851.00
City Administrator
St. Anthony Village
8437
City Clerk
12
56,540.00
City Manager
Average: 73,548.05
•
•
•
-1959-
•
Golden Valley
20312
Director of Public Works
1
123,098.00
City Manager
Anoka
17966
PublicService s Director /City
Engineer
2
111,904.00
City Manager
New Hope
20718
Director of Public Works
3
111,779.20
City Manager
Hopkins
17290
Public Works Director
4
106,593.00
City Manager
Hugo
13140
Public Works Director
5
99,081.00
City Administrator
Robbinsdale
Orono
13775
7980
Public Works Director /City
Engineer
Engineer
6
8
98,904.00
93,025.00
City Manager
City Administrator
C
St. Anthony Village
8437
Public Works Director
9
83,860.00
City Manager
13140
Shorewood
7618
No Public Works Director Salary
reported in LMC Salary Survey
Rosemount
City Administrator
Rosemount
21521
Orono
City Administrator
Mendota Heights
11766
Mendota Heights
11766
Rogers
7497
City Administrator
Average: LuZ, ia.yi
•
Golden Valley
20312
Chief of Fire & Inspections
Services
1
110,653.00
City Manager
Anoka
17966
Anoka /Champlin Fire Chief
2
100,774.40
Hopkins
Mound ;;
St. Anthony Village
17290
9787
8437
Fire Chief
fire::Chief
Fire Chief
3
4" ; '
5
96,656.00
r 96;23 00 T
83,860.00
City Manager
City Manager 1
City Manager
Rogers
7497
Fire Chief
6
81,494.40
City Administrator
Robbinsdale
13775
No Fire Chief Salary Reported in
LMC Salary Survey
New Hope
20718
Shorewood
7618
Hugo
8
13140
Rosemount
21521
Orono
7980
Mendota Heights
11766
Average: y4,`J4.i..SU
-1960-
Average: ws,uii.uU
•
• 1 '
0
M
Ln
0
M'�
tr,
m
r
H
vl
}
WD
rq
... 00
00
b0
00
4A. �{1T
, Vim'
bD
E
1
t m
m
m
m
'�E
m
2
7
41
z,i
u''u
vv
v'uuv�v
>
0
O
O
N
O:
O
m°
O
N
Ot
=p
f
FV'
M
1
fzi
0 ?
0
.
0
Oo
o
a..
.
0
0 0
0
c
+
ri N
m
-�7
to
l0
f-
00.
. 0
t m
X
ck E
- m
�
L
r
° T
a
y
U
0
Z V))
'U
m
u
•
•
�•
w vl
N
2
�Ol
N
d
W. .�
N
U _j
�-
�uu�u
`-'
u'u
uu
i
u
U
4d
V
u' u'.
4)
d O
0
0
n
CL
a
CL CL
o
Z
n
N
N nV
d'
V)
co
n
m
m
Ln
n
m
o
a
r �
-t
• N 1
N
e-I
e I
N
co
QI
f
N m
m
C
m
tka m
: m
UU
'.. R .
14 G
L
L
m
t
° o a
:° v Z
cu w
to
ai
m
`w
m
`v
t+
O o
.y.
.�?
L'
L �:
} ' V
L
k !" ,
_Q cc
cr
J
c
s
c
J
Z ;
,
l0
lD
1-
m
N
-1
00
•-1
O
M
O
q r
O
00
00
'-1
'i
N
t0
l0
M
01
1,
m
n
N
N
Z
cc
10
n
u)
n
o
o a
V
R'Z-41
•
•
;Ln
mom]
Ln
r
}
WD
rq
V
4A. �{1T
H
i/1
1
7
>
t
O
m°
f
1
fzi
L
to
m
wt
`K. N
M •C
t m
ck E
- m
U
0
V
'U
00
i
M
�0
00
00 00#
0
to
N
N nV
d'
V)
flfl.
at
QI
f
N m
m
C
m
tka m
: m
UU
'.. R .
14 G
L
L
m
t
° o a
:° v Z
cu w
to
ai
m
`w
m
`v
t+
O o
.y.
.�?
L'
L �:
} ' V
L
_Q cc
cr
J
v a�
J J
v
: J
c
J
Z ;
,
l0
lD
1-
m
N
-1
00
•-1
O
M
O
q r
O
00
00
'-1
'i
N
t0
l0
M
01
1,
m
n
N
N
'-1
0)
n
10
n
u)
n
N
N
14
r4
N
.�-1
T
00
LC
a
°
3
m
O
E
0
.0
-
Y
O
m
°
°
mo
,: o
w.Q
zm
x'o`
���
•
•
Exhibit C. (1)
•
The full text can be found at the following website:
http: / /www.mmb.state.mn.us /doc /comp /hay /statejobmatch.pdf
a
x
40
Minnesota Management & Budget
0
'�sZ:W
Table of Contents
Page
Introduction & Instructions .................................................................... ..............................1
Job Match List — Job Categories ............................................................ ..............................5
Section 1.
Accounting and Finance ................................................ ..............................5
Section 2.
Administration/Management ......................................... ..............................9
Section 3.
Assessing, Planning, Zoning, Building Inspection ....... .............................15
Section 4.
Clerical /Office Support Services .................................. .............................17
Section 5.
Communications/Marketing ......................................... .............................21
Section 6.
Computer and Technology ............................................ .............................23
Section7.
Education ...................................................................... .............................27
Section8.
Engineering ................................................................... .............................33
Section 9.
Food and Hospitality ..................................................... .............................35
Section 10.
Human Resources ....................................................... .............................39
Section 11.
Law/Legal Services ..................................................... .............................41
Section 12.
Maintenance/Public Works /Construction ................... .............................43
Section 13.
Medical/Dental and Health ......................................... .............................47
Section 14.
Public Safety ............................................................... .............................63
Section 15.
Social Services ............................................................ .............................67
Section16.
Utilities ........................................................................ .............................73
Section 17.
Various Services ......................................................... .............................77
Alphabetical Listing of Local Government Job Titles .......................... .............................81
Alphabetical Listing of State Government Job Titles ........................... .............................83
Sample of State Job Matches by Know -How Factor ............................ .............................85
Sample of State Job Matches by Problem- Solving Factor
Job Match Worksheet .. ...............................
Background Information ...............
............................87
................... .............................89
0
•
-1963-
Introduction and Instructions
0 Overview of Pay Equity as it Relates to Job Evaluation:
The purpose of the Local Government Pay Equity Act passed in 1984 is to correct historic
gender -based wage discrimination in public employment in Minnesota. This is an ongoing
process and requires ongoing compliance. The law requires that female classes not be paid
consistently below male classes of "comparable value." Comparable value is the job evaluation
rating or points assigned to a job class and the focus of this booklet.
Establishing job evaluation ratings is the first step in the pay equity process. It is important to
remember that comparable value or a job evaluation rating does not include seniority or
performance; rather it is an evaluation of job content. Job content is measured by the skill, effort
responsibility and working conditions required of the job class. In addition, job evaluation
should not be interpreted strictly as a rigid "pay for points" system where each point is worth "x"
dollars. Pay equity can be achieved and requirements of the law met even though some jobs
with same points do not receive exactly the same pay. The second part of the pay equity
process is pay analysis and more information is available on this and compliance requirements at
www.mmb.state.mn.us
The State Job Match System of job evaluation is intended as a straightforward, simple tool to
help local governments effectively analyze the jobs in their jurisdictions by matching up job
• descriptions with descriptions for state jobs that have already been rated. Once the descriptions
have been matched, a rating or "job points" can be assigned to the local government job. Job
evaluation is not an exact science and if done well, will involve thorough discussion and
unbiased decisions. Job analysis must be completed before pay analysis is done.
I. Description of the Job Match System & Website
Job match is a simple, inexpensive way to assign points to jobs in your jurisdiction by
matching them to descriptions of state jobs found in this booklet. To make it easier, this
booklet is divided into 17 job categories. In each category there are groupings of jobs.
Within each group the state titles are listed from lowest to highest ranking. There are five
columns on each page as follows:
• Column 1: Titles of jobs typically found in local government. Note: PES Benchmark
refers to a "Public Employment Survey" done by the state's job evaluation consultant,
Hay and Associates.
• Column 2: Titles of jobs found in state government.
• Column 3: Job evaluation points assigned to state jobs using the Hay and Associates
method of rating jobs.
• Column 4: The range of points for the job that is listed.
• Column 5: Overview and brief job description.
•
-1964-
If you cannot find a match in this booklet, check our web site. There are approximately
1800 job descriptions and point ratings for state jobs on the Minnesota Management & •
Budget's (MMB's) web site at www.mmb.state.rnn.us You can view job descriptions and
classification at hgp: / /www.mmb.state.mn.us /staff -hr /class - specs You can find
corresponding Hay point ratings at http://www.mmb.state.mn.us/hay-ratings
II. The Basics of Job Evaluation
Although the job match method is simpler than many other job evaluation systems, the
same basic principles apply:
• You are evaluating job classes, not individuals who hold the job. As you review the list
for a possible match, ask yourself how the job would be described if the current
employee(s) in the class were all gone tomorrow and you needed to hire someone new.
• You must be as objective as possible. Don't "work backwards" by first determining
how much you think classes should be paid and then finding job matches which will fit
this category. Guard against sources of bias by having more than one person review
job matches and/or by establishing an employee committee to discuss evaluations.
• The more employees are involved in the process of evaluating jobs, the more likely
they are to understand and accept the system you use.
III. How To Use The Job Match List •
Step 1. Decide who will review jobs for possible matches. This can be done by an
individual or by a committee including employees, elected officials and other interested
persons. You can guard against bias by having more than one person involved in the job
match process.
Step 2. Gather information about job classes in your jurisdiction. This information can
come from reading position descriptions, interviewing employees, interviewing
supervisors, or from sending a questionnaire to employees and/or supervisors. You may
want to have employees and supervisors review and revise job descriptions before
beginning the job match process.
Step 3. List all classes in your jurisdiction. Next to each job class begin to identify
matches between jobs in your jurisdiction and jobs described in the booklet. Your jobs will
probably fall into three categories:
A. Jobs that Match or Nearly Match:
This category will probably account for about 90 percent of the jobs in your
jurisdiction. If the job in your jurisdiction matches closely with the state job write the
state title and the standard point rating next to the local title.
•
-1965-
B. Slotted Jobs:
• Although there is no direct match for some jobs, it is often possible to determine where
the job fits in the overall hierarchy. Review the jobs which may have already been
matched on your worksheet. You may be able to identify jobs which are at the same
level as the one you're trying to find a match for and give it the same number of points.
If you can't find a job at the same level, you may be able to determine that it fits
between two jobs you have already matched. For example, you may have a job which
you feel fits between a job with 200 points and another job with 250 points. You could
assign a point value then somewhere between 200 and 250.
C. Multi- Function Jobs:
Your job matches with more than one of the jobs on the job match list. If duties outside
of the description comprise only about 5% or less of the job, do not consider the job a
multi - function job. Instead, match it with the primary function of the job. There are
two methods to assign jobs that are multi - functional. The following is an example of a
multifunction job and two methods to evaluate that job.
Example: Equipment Operator:
Possible matches on the list
Highway Maint. Supervisor — 213 pts.
Transportation Associate — 156 pts.
Method 1: Match with the Highest Rated Job
In this case the highest rated job is the Highway Maintenance Supervisor with 213
• points. The rationale for this is that your job requires the employee to have the skill,
effort, responsibility and working conditions of the higher rated job, even though this
fob is only part of the employee's duties. This option is most appropriate when the
employee performs the higher -rated job more than half of the time.
Method 2: Pro -rate the Points According to Time Spent
In this case you would evaluate the amount of time spent on each of the job functions
and then multiply that percentage of time spent by the number of points assigned to
each function.
Highway Maintenance Supervisor - 50% of time. 213 x 50% = 106.5 pts.
Transportation Associate - 50% of time. 156 x 50% = 78 pts.
Total = 185 pts.
This method should not be used for only occasional work in one of the jobs and it
becomes less valid if it is used to match a single job with more than two or three state
jobs. Also, it would not be valid to add together total original points. For example, you
would not add 213 pts. + 156 pts. and assign 369 points for the equipment operator
position.
When all the jobs have been matched, review the overall ranking of jobs and the points
assigned to each job to make sure it makes sense in the context of your organization.
•
IV. Definitions: Types of Supervision
Supervision: Use of the word "supervision" indicates a greater amount of control is •
p p g
exercised over positions in that class than for positions in a class using the word
"direction" in the definition. Supervision levels are differentiated by the specificity and
application to the technical and administrative details of work assignments. Three standard
levels of supervision are used:
Immediate supervision means an employee in the class works under close supervision
where the work assignments are well - detailed and well - prescribed by the superior. It
does not necessarily mean that the individuals are in close physical proximity to one
another. Little opportunity exists to exercise personal initiative, discretion or judgment.
The employee is held responsible only for the accurate and proper application of the
steps of the well - established work process.
• General supervision means an employee in this class is under fairly close supervision
administratively, but the worker is given some latitude technically. The assignments
and objectives are prescribed, but the methods are not typically reviewed or controlled
while the work is in progress. The employee is expected to take the initiative in solving
most problems of detail, except those which are new or unusually complex in nature.
Limited supervision provides considerable freedom from both technical and
administrative oversight while the work is in progress. In addition to the previously
mentioned conditions of general supervision, the employee has: freedom from control •
over the sequence of assignments, a substantial degree of responsibility for determining
what shall be done next, and a substantial degree of independence in planning and
organizing the employee's own work.
V. Background Information
In the back of this book, there is additional information about job evaluation factors and
other job evaluation materials that may be helpful.
•
-1967-
0
•
•
Alphabetical Listing of Local Government Job Titles
Local Jobs
Account Clerk
Accountant
Accounting Manager
Admin
Administrative Asst.
Administrative Asst.
Administrative Secretary
Administrator
Admissions Clerk
Admissions Manager
Appraiser
Assessor
Assistant Principal
Assistant Supt.
Attorney
Auto Serviceworker
Baker
Bartender
Bookkeeper
Building & Grounds Director
Building Inspector
Building Official
Bus Driver
Business Manager
Cable Television Coord.
Cafeteria Helper
Case Aide
Cashier
Cemetery Worker
Chemical Dep. Counselor
Chief Cook
Chief of Police
Chief of Service
Chief Pharmacist
Child Support Officer
City Clerk
City Clerk - Treasurer
Civil Defense Director
Civil Engineer
Clerical Supervisor
Clerk
Clerk of Court
Clinic Manager
Community Development Director
Comp. Op. Experienced
Computer Op. Entry Level
Computer Programmer
Cook
Counselor
County Assessor
County Engineer
Cultural Center Assistant
Custodian
Sec.
1
1
1
13
2
4
4
2
1
13
3
3
7
7
11
12
9
9
1
12
3
3
17
1,11
5
9
15
17
12
13
9
14
13
1 1
14
8
4
4
11
1
3
6
6
6
9
15
3
8
7
12
Customer Service Spec. 4
• -14
Local Jobs
Sec.
Data Entry Operator
4
Data Entry Operator, Sr.
4 •
Dental Asst.
13
Dental Hygienist
13
Dentist
13
Deputy Clerk
4
Deputy Clerk of Court
11
Deputy Sheriff
14
Dietitian
9
Dir
13
Dir. of Nurses /Admin. Patient Care
13
Dishwasher
9
Dispatcher
14
Duplicating Eq. Operator
4
Economic Dev. Coord.
5
Education Aide
7
Education Coordinator
7
Electric Distribution Supv.
16
Electric Plant Operator
16
Electric Superintendent
16
Employee Assistance Clerk
10
Engineer Hwy. Tech.
8
Engineering Aide
8
Engineering Aide II
8
Engineering Aide III
8
Engineering Aide IV
8
Engineering Technician
8
Environmental Education Coord.
7
Executive Director
2 •
Executive Housekeeper
12
Extension Director
17
File Clerk
4
Finance Director
1
Financial Asst. Specialist
''��
Financial Specialist
15
Financial Worker 1/11
15
Fire Inspector
3
Food Service Manger
9
Food Service Worker
9
Grant Project Director
9
Groundskeeper
12
Head Cook
9
Head Custodian
12
Heavy Equip. Op.
12
Highway Maintenance
12
Highway Maintenance Supv.
12
Home Health Aide
13
Housekeeper
12
Housing Code Enforce. Inspector
3
Information Specialist
6
Information Tech. Spec.
6
Interpreter
7
Inspector (Bldg. Plbg.)
3
Instructional Assistants
7
r�
- 196.9-
Local Jobs Sec. Police Sergeant 14
Janitor
12
• Laborer
12
Laundry Manager
17
Laundry Worker
17
Lead Cook
9
Lead Custodian
12
Legal Secretary
4
Librarian
7
Library Aide/Technician
7
Line Supervisor
16
Lineworker
16
Liquor Store Clerk
Liquor Store Manager
9
Maintenance Supervisor
12
Maintenance Worker
12
Manager
Marketing Coord. /Mgr.
Mechanic
12
Media Aide
7
Medical Director
13
Medical Lab. Technician
13
Medical Lab. Technologist
13
Medical Records
13
Medical Records Librarian
13
Medical Records Sec.
13
Medical Records Tech.
13
Nurse (Head)
13
Nurse (LPN)
13
• Nurse (RN)
13
Nurse Anesthetist
13
Nursing Assistant
13
Nursing Supervisor
13
Occupational Therapist
13
Occupational Therapy Tech.
13
Office Assistant
4
Office Manager
4
Park Worker
12
Painter
17
Parking Meter Monitor
14
Payroll Clerk
1
Personnel Coordinator
10
Personnel Director
10
Personnel Manager
10
Personnel Officer
10
Personnel Specialist
10
Pharmacist
13
Physical Therapist
13
Physical Therapy Tech.
13
Physician's Assistant
13
Physician
13
Planner
3
Planning Associate
3
Police Captain
14
Police Detective
14
Police Dispatcher
14
Police Lieutenant
14
• Police Officer
14
- 197.0-
Local Jobs
Sec.
Power Plant Operator, Chief
16
Power Plant Supervisor
16 .
Principal
7
Program Administrator
2
Program Coordinator
2
Property Appraiser, Sr.
3
Psychiatric Technician
13
Psychologist
13
Public Health Nurse
13
Public Service Officer
14
Public Works Worker
12
Purchasing Director
1
Radiological Technologist
13
Receptionist
4
Recreation Supv. 1
17
Recreation Therapy Asst. Dir.
13
Recreation Therapy Tech.
13
Recreation Supv. 2
17
Restoration Specialist
17
Retail Clerk
17
Sanitation Worker
12
Secretary
4
Sewer & Water Maint. Wrkr.
16
Sewer & Water Maint. Wrkr., Sr.
16
Social Services Director
15
Social Worker
15
Social Worker Sup.
15
Speech Pathologist
13
Staff Dev. Coordinator
10 •
Stationary Engineer
12
Stock Clerk
9
Superintendent
7
Supervisor of Food Service
9
Supply Clerk
9
Supply Technician
9,17
Surgical Technician
13
Teacher
7
Teacher Aide
7
Transportation Coordinator
17
Treasurer
1
Truck Driver
12
Typist
4
Utilities Meter Service Worker
Utilities Superintendent
16
Veterans Service Officer
15
Volunteer Services Director
15
Ward Clerk
4
Wastewater Plant Supervisor
16
Water Plant Supervisor
16
Watershed Technician 1
17
Water/Wastewater Plant Operator
16
Welfare Director
15
Word Processing Operator
4
•
-1971-
Administrator 1142 1096 -1232 Carries out the policies established by the
PES Benchmark governing body for the efficient
Rating administration of the business of the
jurisdiction. Duties include coordinating
administration of all departments and
developing the annual budget. Usually
responsible for an organization of usually
several hundred employees.
• Admin. Executive 2
238 233 -252 Under limited supervision, provides
Administration /Management
advice and technical assistance and
• Program
performs administrative /coordinative
Coordinator
activities to assist in the development and
• Program
implementation of policy, standards,
Administrator
and /or program operations for more than
State Possible
one major parallel function.
Possible Local
Possible Match
Point Point
Class Title
With State Classes
Rating Range
Brief Description of Job Class
• AdministratoLPESBenchmark
228 228 -238
Acts as executive officer. Keeps records
• City Clerk
of all council proceedings, handles all
• City Clerk-
correspondence on behalf of the council
Treasurer
draws up agendas and executes any
assignments given by council. In
Executive
Director
4e
statutory cities performs duties
• Manager
prescribed by statute. Acts as executive
officer keeps records. City clerk in a
small city, usually fewer than 10
employees.
City
275 268 -289
Combines job duties of city clerk and
Clerk/Treasurer
city treasurer. Generally in a smaller
PES Benchmark
entity.
Rating
Administrator/
483 466 -496
Serves as top administrator for governing
Manager
body. Prepares budgets, broad authority
t T
to hire, discipline and dismiss personnel.
7
Implements policy hires personnel in an
As-1 A (
organization of at least several
departments and several different job
classes.
Business Manager
479 451 -496
Under limited supervision, plans and
2
manages all fiscal, service, and business
operations of a large institution to
support general policies and objectives
determined by the administrator;
supervises employees engaged in diverse
functions; performs related work as
required. Usually responsible for the
supervision of at least 25 employees.
Administrator 1142 1096 -1232 Carries out the policies established by the
PES Benchmark governing body for the efficient
Rating administration of the business of the
jurisdiction. Duties include coordinating
administration of all departments and
developing the annual budget. Usually
responsible for an organization of usually
several hundred employees.
• Admin. Executive 2
238 233 -252 Under limited supervision, provides
Assistant
advice and technical assistance and
• Program
performs administrative /coordinative
Coordinator
activities to assist in the development and
• Program
implementation of policy, standards,
Administrator
and /or program operations for more than
•
one major parallel function.
- 197,?-
State Possible
Possible Local Possible Match Point Point •
Class Title With State Classes Rating Ranee Brief Description of Job Class
Accounting Accounting Officer 342
314 -342 Under limited supervision, maintains large
Manager Sr.
state - federal or state - county accounts,
Finance Director
oversees a major accounting function in a
Treasurer
large department, or directs an accounting
division of a numerous employees to
coordinate the various phases of
accounting services; develops procedures
and policies for the work involved; usually
provides leadwork for accounting
professional, para - professional, and
bookkeeping employees.
Accounting 353
323 -353 Employees in this class supervise a
Supervisor, Sr.
complex accounting system and maintain a
large and complex system of accounts as a
section chief in the finance division of a
large department, large state- federal or
state- county accounts in the accounting
division of a large institution. Supervisory
responsibility includes either effectively
recommending or hiring, directing,
disciplining, performance evaluation,
assigning the duties, and training
accounting professional, technical and
clerical staff. This responsibility extends
to the development of policies as well as
•
procedures for the fiscal operation.
Accounting 393
372 -417 Under limited supervision, supervises an
Supervisor Prin.
accounting section or serves as top
assistant to an accounting manager or
other high -level fiscal management officer
in a large state department to provide
financial support for departmental policies
and programs; performs related work as
required.
• 479
464 -5 11 Under limited supervision, directs all
accounting functions of a large state
FAccounting,
department, agency, or institution to
provide technical and supervisory
financial support for policies and
programs established by the department's
head; supervises professional and
technical accounting employees and serves
as chief liaison to activity managers;
performs related work as required.
•
-197$-
•
-1974-
Assessing, Planning,
Zoning, Building Inspection
•
State Possible
Possible Local
Possible Match
Point Point
Class Title
With State Classes
Rating Range Brief Description of Job Class
• Appraiser
Real Estate
298 282 -308 Under general supervision, conducts
• Assessor
Representative
appraisals of various kinds of properties
• County
being acquired by the jurisdiction to
Assessor
determine fair market value; prepares
• Property
reports to support conclusions; appears
Appraiser Sr.
as expert witness at hearings and court
actions to varify appraisals; may provide
technical advice to lower level
employees.
Appraiser
282 275 -289 Under general supervision, assists in
developing programs to uniformly
appraise real and personal property for
taxation purposes.
• Building
Building Code
233 228 -245 Under general supervision, inspects
Inspector
Inspector
building, mobile homes, and other
• Fire Inspector
structures to ensure conformity to
• Inspector (Bldg,
applicable building codes. Occasional
Plbg)
guidance and review of results obtained
• Housing Code
rather than direct supervision is made by
•
Enforcement
the Building Code Assistant Director or
the Building Code Director.
Inspector
• Building
Building Code
282 275 -289 Under limited supervision, an employee
Official
Representative
in this class provides building code
education, consultation, plan approval,
construction industry program
administration and liaison services for
division staff, governmental officials,
design and construction /manufacturing
professionals, and concerned citizens to
ensure code compliance to safeguard the
health, safety, comfort and securing of
building occupants in the state. Consult
with building design professionals and
division clientele to discuss identified
inadequacies and relevant state and
federal laws, code applicability, state and
municipal administrative procedures,
construction methods and tested /listed
materials and approve proposed
corrections, by meeting with the affected
parties, clarifying code requirements, and
determining equivalency of proposed
alternative methods of construction
compliance.
•
-1974-
State Possible
Possible Local Possible Match Point Point
Class Title With State Classes Rating Range
Brief Description of Job Class
•
Bldg. Code Section 393 372 -406
Under limited supervision, supervises a
Chief
major section of the Building Code
Division to solve complex and technical
code enforcement problems.
• Planner Planner 238 233 -238
Under general supervision, contributes to
• Planning
the preparation of reports, research
Associate
studies or projects for clearly defined
areas of limited scope which identify and
evaluate the social, economic, political,
cultural and environmental impact of
recreational, health, urban,
transportation, community and /or land
use proposals.
Planner, 275 267 -275
Under limited supervision, conducts
Intermediate
research for clearly defined projects of
limited scope and independently
monitors existing plans and recommends
alternatives to insure the future
availability of adequate resources,
facilities and services; and/or assists in
the development of plans for major
projects.
Planner Senior- 332 314 -332
Under limited supervision, collects,
•
Community
analyzes, and presents data and makes
proposals to officials and planning
bodies to provide technical advice in a
specialized area of community planning.
• Community Planning Director 511 511 -551
Under administrative direction, an
Development State
employee in this class has general
Director
responsibility for developing, in
conjunction with various state
administrative agencies and local units of
government, a program of coordinated
and integrated planning for use in the
state's overall comprehensive policy plan.
Responsibility involves coordination and
development of statewide, long -range
plans for natural resources, governmental
needs, transportation and social
resources.
•
-1975-
•
•
Possible Local
Class Title
• Economic
Development
Coordinator
Possible Match
With State Classes
Community
Development
Representative
State Possible
Point Point
Ratin Range Brief Description of Job Class
342 342 -375 Under limited supervision, employees in
this class resolve a full range of
community and economic development
problems by implementing the Minnesota
Small Cities Development Program, the
Minnesota Economic Recovery Program,
and the Urban Homestead Program.
Employees in this class interpret state
and federal housing and community
development laws, policies and
regulations; direct local communities'
analysis of needs and strategies for
housing and community development
activities; review and evaluate grant
applications, determining funding
priorities; monitor grantee progress and
performance.
- 19752-
•
-1977-
State Possible
Possible Local
Possible Match
Point Point
Class Title
With State Classes
Ratine Ranee
Brief Description of Job Class
.
Civil Engineer
Engineer 1
275 268 -289
Under general supervision/procedural
County
Graduate
control, applies technical skills and
Engineer
knowledge to solve clearly defined
Engineering
engineering problems; may provide lead
Aide IV
work direction to para- professional and
technical engineering employees.
Experience 0 -2 years.
Engineer 2
314 314 -332
Under limited supervision/procedural
Graduate
control, applies technical skills and
knowledge to solve problems and /or
complete projects in a specialized
engineering field; may coordinate an
engineering program in a State agency;
provides lead work direction to para-
professional and technical engineering
employees. More than 2 years of
experience.
Engineering
323 314 -332
Under limited supervision /procedural
Specialist
control, performs technical, para-
professional engineering /surveying tasks
and practically applies engineering
concepts to assist in the completion of
projects.
•
Engineer Senior
393 372 -406
Under limited supervision /procedural
control, applies professional skills and
knowledge to solve specialized
engineering problems in the field or in an
agency; coordinates activities related to
one or more complex engineering
projects; may provide lead work
direction to lower level professional
engineering employees.
Co. Engineer
598 551 -631
Plans and implements all the
PES Benchmark
engineering, design, construction and
Rating
maintenance activities of the public
works department. Job requires a
registered professional civil engineer.
•
-1977-
• Chief of Police PES Benchmark 353 342 -362 Responsible for supervision, planning
Rating and organization of a fairly small police
department of usually five or fewer.
Schedules duty shifts of police officers.
Also participates in patrolling and other
police functions for the protection of life
and property and enforcement of laws
and ordinances.
• Police Police Lieutenant
State
Possible
Lieutenant PES Benchmark
Possible Local Possible Match
Class Title With State Classes
Point
Ratin
Point
Range
Brief Description of Job Class
•
other reports and records required in the
• Police Sergeant Police Sergeant
353
342 -362
Supervises the activities of a squad or
PES Benchmark
and supervise the activities of Patrol
shift of patrol officers engaged in the
Rating
•
protection of life and property and the
• Police Captain Police Captain
529 509 -529
Supervises and coordinates all the
enforcement of laws and ordinances.
activities of the police department as are
Maintains police records, reviews
delegated by the chief or sheriff. Is
reports, provides instruction to
police or sheriffs department.
department personnel and coordinates the
677 677 -725
An employee in this classification
work of personnel assigned.
• Chief of Police PES Benchmark 353 342 -362 Responsible for supervision, planning
Rating and organization of a fairly small police
department of usually five or fewer.
Schedules duty shifts of police officers.
Also participates in patrolling and other
police functions for the protection of life
and property and enforcement of laws
and ordinances.
• Police Police Lieutenant
410 393 -417
Performs administrative duties in
Lieutenant PES Benchmark
maintaining police records, preparing
Rating
budgets, and in preparing or maintaining
other reports and records required in the
department. May also train, schedule
and supervise the activities of Patrol
Officers (Deputy Sheriffs) in their day -
•
to -day patrol functions.
• Police Captain Police Captain
529 509 -529
Supervises and coordinates all the
PES Benchmark
activities of the police department as are
delegated by the chief or sheriff. Is
typically the number two position in the
police or sheriffs department.
State Patrol Major
677 677 -725
An employee in this classification
supervises State Patrol district
administrative and enforcement programs
including laws, rules, regulations,
policies and procedures; coordinates
activities with other state, federal and
local agencies as well as with the general
public to achieve an effective and
efficient traffic law enforcement program
within one of two State Patrol Regions
consisting of five or six field districts.
Serves as chief operations officer for the
assigned State Patrol Region. Inspects
all patrol districts /sections in the region
to ensure that Patrol rules, policies and
procedures are being followed.
• Firefighter Firefighter
227 227 -254
Performs full -time firefighting duty
PES Benchmark
involving the protection of life and
• Rating
property through combating,
extinguishing and preventing fire.
- 197 -8-
•
- 197.9-
State Possible
Possible Local
Possible Match
Point Point
Class Title
With State Classes
Rating Range
Brief Description of Job Class •
• Heavy
Transportation
156 150 -163
Under immediate supervision, performs
Equipment Op.
Associate
semi - skilled tasks to maintain and
• Highway
construct gravel, bituminous and
Maintenance
concrete highways. Transfer, operate
• Public Works
and transport equipment as certified.
Worker
Perform routine testing and inspection of
construction material.
Transportation
183 173 -187
Under general supervision, performs
Generalist
skilled tasks to maintain and construct all
types of highways and may provide lead
work to co- workers. Transfer and
operate the full range of heavy
equipment used by the transportation
department; modify and calibrate
equipment to meet specialized needs.
• Maintenance
Highway
213 199 -218
Responsible for supervising and directing
Supervisor
Maintenance
general maintenance /public works
• Highway
Supervisor
activities. Participates in maintenance
Maintenance
PES Benchmark
work.
Sup.
Rating
Street Maintenance
252 149 -252
Responsible for supervising the work of
Sup.
one or more small work crews engaged
PES Benchmark
in construction or maintenance
operations of a routine nature.
Employees of this class are responsible
for on -site supervision and for obtaining
effective and efficient performance from
subordinates in carrying out assigned
tasks. Size of crew supervised varies
according to area of work assignment.
Assignments are received from a superior
who makes inspections to evaluate work
progress and adequacy and to provide
specific direction where required.
Highway
301 291 -308
Under limited supervision, coordinates
Maintenance
road and maintenance activities within a
Supervisor
subarea of a Department of
Transportation maintenance area;
supervises maintenance personnel;
performs related work as required.
•
- 197.9-
• Water/ Water/Wastewater 171 167 -180 Skilled work in operation of a water
Wastewater Plant Operator pumping and treatment plant, and/or
Plant Operator PES Benchmark sewage treatment, sludge processing and
Rating disposal equipment at a sewage treatment
plant. Responsibilities may include
operation and maintenance of wells,
pumps, filters, aerators, lagoons,
chemical treatment operations, testing of
water quality, and related operations.
• Wastewater Wastewater Plant 291 282 -291 This is technical supervisory and some
Plant Supv. Supv, administrative work in directing the
PES Benchmark operations of a sewage treatment plant.
Rating Responsible for supervising the work of
wastewater plant personnel engaged in
the operation, maintenance, repair, and
laboratory testing work conducted at the
wastewater treatment plant.
•
•'1
Utilities
•
State Possible
Possible Local
Possible Match
Point Point
Class Title
With State Classes
Rating Range
Brief Description of Job Class
• Utilities Meter
Meter Reader
144 138 -144
This is skilled mechanical work in the
Service Worker
PES Benchmark
installation, maintenance, and repair of
Rating
water and/or electric meters. Work is
reviewed through analysis of reports and
occasional inspection.
• Sewer & Water
Sewer and Water
149 146 -152
Performs semi - skilled work in the
Maint Wkr
Maintenance Wkr.
maintenance and repair of municipal
• Sewer & Water
PES Benchmark
water or sewer systems. Specific duties
Maint. Wkr. Sr.
Rating
may include maintaining and repairing
pumps, motors and related equipment in
water - pumping and sewage -life stations,
flushing storm and sanitary sewers,
cleaning storm catch basins and raising
and lowering manholes to street grade.
Sewer and Water
176 173 -183
Performs skilled work in the maintenance
Maintenance Wkr,
and repair of municipal water or sewer
PES Benchmark
systems. Repairs the more complex
Rating
pumps, motors and related equipment in
water - pumping and sewage -lift stations.
Several years experience in municipal
•
water or sewer maintenance required.
• Water/ Water/Wastewater 171 167 -180 Skilled work in operation of a water
Wastewater Plant Operator pumping and treatment plant, and/or
Plant Operator PES Benchmark sewage treatment, sludge processing and
Rating disposal equipment at a sewage treatment
plant. Responsibilities may include
operation and maintenance of wells,
pumps, filters, aerators, lagoons,
chemical treatment operations, testing of
water quality, and related operations.
• Wastewater Wastewater Plant 291 282 -291 This is technical supervisory and some
Plant Supv. Supv, administrative work in directing the
PES Benchmark operations of a sewage treatment plant.
Rating Responsible for supervising the work of
wastewater plant personnel engaged in
the operation, maintenance, repair, and
laboratory testing work conducted at the
wastewater treatment plant.
•
•'1
State Possible
Possible Local Possible Match Point Point
Class Title With State Classes Ratine Ranee
Brief Description of Job Class
•
• Electric Distrib. Electric 363 342 -363
This is technical supervisory and
Supv. Distribution Supv.
administrative work in supervising the
PES Benchmark
construction, operation, maintenance and
Rating
repair of the municipal electric
distribution system. Work involves
planning and supervising the work of
electrical distribution system
construction and maintenance workers,
electrician and meter service work.
Work also includes maintenance of
necessary records, preparation of
periodic reports, and preparing and
administering the department budget.
• Utilities Utilities 353 332 -353
This is technical supervisory and some
Superintendent Superintendent
administrative work in the conduction,
PES Benchmark
operation, maintenance, and repair of the
Rating
municipal utilities system which includes
electrical distribution, water treatment
and distribution, and sewage treatment.
Work involves the responsibility for
planning, organizing, directing, and
reviewing the construction, operation,
maintenance and repair of the municipal
utilities system. Although responsibility
for many operations is assigned to
•
subordinates, surveillance over all field
activities is required through inspection,
consultation and review of reports, and
involves assisting in the solution of
difficult work problems. Work is
reviewed through reports, conferences
and evaluation of the efficiency of
operations. Supervision is exercised over
large number of lead, skilled, limited
skilled and unskilled employees.
1�1
-1981-
Exhibit C (2)
Robert Half'
•
2012 S ALARY GUID
ACCOUNTING &FINANCE
0
The Hiring Environment
t
Companies positioning themselves for growth are hiring accounting and finance
professionals. Employers are refilling positions cut during the recession, adding
new ones, and making replacement hires to address attrition and turnover.
Preparing for Growth: Putting the Right Pieces in Place
Demand is climbing for financial analysts who can help their organizations formu-
late expansion strategies while continuing to monitor costs. Companies also are
filling core operational accounting positions in areas such as accounts payable,
accounts receivable and collections in reaction to a higher volume of business,
The market for skilled talent is tightening, however, and firms are finding it more
difficult to locate professionals who meet all their requirements. In some specialties,
top performers are receiving multiple offers and counteroffers.
Recruiting challenges may become more pronounced, resulting in lost
productivity and additional burden on existing staff. Already, the hiring cycle
is growing longer, as reflected in a Robert Half survey of chief financial
officers (CFOs).
1 c
?' t 5 f sk 3e Ya 'rtt + ` A `. �' it . # 4 . :°n€ .Yr �.�«.
4 1 0 .'
Auera�ge�irr1 ���a trr�g�andf rya c ua�a��i+s�
i may°
*$ '-
r M�atgermertF' 7 'weeks 5 weeks
Stafif. 5 weeks 4 weeks
Source: Robert Hall survey of more than 1,400 CFOs
Still, some businesses remain cautious. Many prefer to work with temporary
professionals while assessing their long -term hiring needs and to evaluate
prospective new employees. In addition, interim professionals are being brought
in to provide specialized expertise on critical initiatives and support personnel
during peak workload periods. This staffing model has become increasingly
popular in recent years as companies attempt to meet business objectives
without overhiring.
•
-1983-
3 2012 Salary Guide - Robert Half
� 4a,
5
Accountfing and Finance Salaries
Financial Officer - Company:
To $50 $ 94,250 $ 130,5UU y o
(The above category assumes there is a corporate controller who reports to the CFO.)
Treasurer - Company Sales in Millions
•
$500+
$ 268,000 - $ 392,250
' $ 273;0001, h$ s4 X50,
3.
$250 to $500
$ 185,500 - $ 262,250
" $ 18;500$ 21 ,00
3.5%
$100 to $250
$ 126,250 - $ 179,250
t
$ 29; 0 1 4,:500{
2.6%
$50 to $100
$ 107,500 - $ 145,750
$ 1 Q9,OO�Q, $ 1 X0,7,50:"
2.6%
To $50
$ 93,250 - $ 126,500
94,500$, 130;250
2.3Mo
$ 140,000- $ 196,750
3.1%
$250 to $500
$ 127,000 - $ 163,250
Vice President of Finance - Company sales in Millions
2.8%
$500+
$ 212,000 - $ 328,750
215 50Q $ 340;750;
2.9%
$250 to $500
$ 172,250 - $ 251,750
$ 17,000 ? j20_
2.7%
$100 to $250
$ 131,750 - $ 180,250 $ 13 ,5,0 85 50,
2.3%
$50 to $100
$ 107,250 - $ 145,250
' $F109 0008 4 r. R 0
2.5%
To $50
$ 84,500 - $ 116,750
$ 8fi,75 $ 1'' ;000`:
3.2%
Director of Finance
- Company Sales in Millions
$500+
$ 140,500 - $ 206,750
144, „,4$d 500
3.1%
$250 to $500
$ 121,250 - $ 173,750
$,
$100 to $250
$ 103,500 - $ 142,250
$ X106 - ;250 4110 ", 3.4%
$50 to $100
$ 95,750 - $ 127,250
$ aa; nnn _5nor
2.9%
Director of Accounting - Company Sales in Millions
$500+
$ 133,500 - $ 183,250
$ 136,750
3.8%
$250 to $500
$ 118,000 - $ 161,750
$ 121,250 ,$ 168,25'0'
3.5%
$100 to $250
$50 to $100
$ 99,250 - $ 130,000
$ 87,250 - $ 115,000
$ 10 `$ 1
$ 66,500 '$ 120,000_
3.3%
3.6%
To $50
$ 75,500 - $ 101,000
$ 77 ,'$ 165 :250.
3.7%
Director of Financial Reporting - Company Sales in Millions
$500+
$ 137,000 - $ 189,500
$ 140,000- $ 196,750
3.1%
$250 to $500
$ 127,000 - $ 163,250
$ 129,500 - $ 169,000
2.8%
$100 to $250
$ 114,500 - $ 147,250
$ 11 -;$ 152,250
2.7%
$50 to $100
$ 100,750 - $ 130,250
$ 03,006-
i 35,000;
3.0%
To $50
$ 88,000 - $ 113,750
$ 89,50,0
; $�11�8000
2.9%
0 a. Bonuses and incentives reflect an increasingly large part of overall pay at this level and are not included in the
salary ranges listed above. Advanced degrees or professional certifications also are assumed at this level.
Unless otherwise noted (see footnote a "), add 5 -10 percent for graduate degrees or professional certifications.
-1984-
1 0 2012 Salary Guide - Robert Half
( � * Vs
M BLS
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE SALARIES
raw up m......
$
ZV 1 1
'LUl2 R4 change
Audit /Assurance Services
- Small Firmsde
$
70,750 - $
Senior Manager /Director
$
85,250 - $ 114,750
Senior
3.5%
Manager'
$
70,500 - $ 89,250
.
3.4%
Senior
$
55,250-$ 71,500
5 0 ®p 4 = . > '
3.4%
1 to 3 Years
$
46,750-$ 58,000
?
3.6%
Up to 1 Year
$
41,500-$ 50,000
r 0 <
3.3%
Management Services - Large Firms de
$
6 $
3,750 -
Senior Manager /Director'
$
107,000 - $ 166,250
00 `$$1T5 "00! 3. 6%
Manager'
$
86,250-$ 117,250
(' 8 750 $ O
3.6%
Senior
$
69,000-$ 90,250
3.5%
1 to 3 Years
$
58,250-$ 72,250
.6
U to 1 Year
Up
$
50,250 - $ 62,000
k 'L � x
$ 51,500 64;�'�0.'
3.1 %
;_
Management Services - Midsize Firms d
Senior Manager /Director'
$
94,500-$ 142,000
p
3 .5%
Manager'
$
79,750-$ 103,250
107,250'
3.4%
Senior
$
62,000 83
64OU s rte.
3.4%
1 to 3 Years
$
51,750 - $ 64
i` 53 253 25 X67¢2 0:'
p
3.4%
Up to 1 Year
$
44,000-$ 55.000
` 57,2riQ,"
3.3%
Management S ervices - small Firms d
Senior Mana er /Director
$
85,500 - $ 116,000
q= p$7750x ``1 000`
3.6/0
Manager
$
70,750 - $
90,000
r p 00 3;75U
3.4%
Senior
$
55,750 - $
72,000
° $ 4x 57 50U $ 7 j750
_. � .•,may
3.5%
1 to 3 Years
$
47,000 - $
58,250
.;�$ ' 48 50 60,500
3.3%
Up to 1 Year
$
42,000 - $
50,750
' $ , 43;000 .$` 52,75'0
3.2%
Paraprofess /Bookkeeper - All Firms
Paraprofessional /
Bookkeeper
$
6 $
3,750 -
53,250
$ '37 500 = 55 500?
$
3.3
a. Bonuses and incentives reflect an increasingly
large part of overall pay at this level and are
not included in the salary ranges listed above.
Advanced degrees or professional certifications
also are assumed at this level.
d. Large firms = $250+ million in sales
Midsize firms = $25 million to $250 million in sales
Small firms = up to $25 million in sales
e. Salary does not reflect overtime or bonuses, which
are significant portions of compensation for these
positions.
Unless otherwise noted (see footnote V9, add 5 -10 percent for graduate degrees or professional certifications.
-1985-
i 1. 065
P?4 firs
•
•
19 2012 Salary Guide - Robert Half
usto�mi Salaries
for LocaI��Markets
The national :salary ranges can be customized for more than 130 U.S. cities
using the local variances listed on Pages 23 and 24. The index figures listed are
intended to serve as a guide for determining average starting salaries in select
U.S. cities. A number of factors, including company size, employee benefits,
candidate skill sets and market trends, may impact actual compensation.
The information is supported by data from the U.S. Department of Labor's
Bureau of Labor Statistics and Robert Half's U.S. offices, the expertise of our
local staffing and recruiting managers, independent research, and our company's
ongoing surveys of CFOs and other senior business leaders.
The average salary index for all U.S. markets is 100.
Follow the steps below to calculate the approximate salary range for a specific
position in your area:
Example: Senior internal auditor at a midsize company in Dallas
1. Locate the position and national salary range for a senior internal auditor at
a midsize company on Page 12.
• (The salary range is $65,000 to $84,250.)
2. Locate the index number for Dallas on Page 24.
(The index number for Dallas is 105.5.)
3. Move the decimal point in the index number two places to the left (1.055).
4. Multiply the low end of the national salary range ($65,000) by the index
number as a percentage (from step 3).
$65,000 x 1.055 = $68,575
5. Repeat step 4 using the high end of the salary range ($84,250).
$84,250 x 1.055 = $88,884
6. The approximate starting salary range for a senior internal auditor at a
midsize company in Dallas is $68,575 to $88,884.
•
-1986-
22 2012 Salary Guide • Robert Half '"
CUSTOMIZING SALARIES FOR LOCAL MARKETS
Alabama
Birmingham ........... 95.0
Mobile ................. 86.0
Arizona
Phoenix ...............105.0
Tucson ...............100.0
Arkansas
Fayetteville ............ 95.0
Little Rock ............. 95.0
California
Fresno ................. 85.0
Irvine ..................12
4.5
Los Angeles ..........
124.5
Oakland ..............127.0
Fort Collins............
Ontario ...............110.0
Greeley ................
Sacramento ..........101.5
Loveland ...............
San Diego ............
115.0
San Francisco ........
135.5
San Jose .............133.0
Santa Barbara ........
121.0
Santa Rosa............
98.0
Stockton ..............
85.0
Colorado
Boulder ...............113.3
Jacksonville............
Colorado Springs .....
90.1
Denver ................102.8
Miami /Fort
Fort Collins............
92.8
Greeley ................
83.8
Loveland ...............
90.5
Pueblo .................
76.0
Connecticut
Hartford ..............116.5
New Haven ........... 112.0
Stamford .............131.0
Delaware Kansas
Wilmington ........... 102.0 Kansas City ........... 97.0
District of Columbia
Washington ..........130.0
Florida
Fort Myers ............. 86.0
Jacksonville............
93.0
Melbourne .............
93.0
Miami /Fort
99.0
Lauderdale .........106.7
Des Moines ...........
Orlando ...............
98.5
St. Petersburg.........
94.0
Tampa .................
96.0
Georgia
Atlanta ................105.0
Macon ................. 80.0
Savannah .............. 80.0
Hawaii
Honolulu ............... 92.0
Idaho
Boise .................. 86.1
Kentucky
Lexington .............. 87.5
Louisville ..............
90.5
Louisiana
Grand Rapids .........
New Orleans ..........
99.0
Maine
Des Moines ...........
Portland ...............
95.0
Maryland
Baltimore .............103.0
Massachusetts
Boston ...............132.0
Springfield ............ 104.0
Michigan
Ann Arbor .............
99.5
Detroit .................
98.7
Grand Rapids .........
84.5
Lansing ................
83.5
Minnesota
Illinois
Chicago ..............122.7
Naperville .............112.0
Rockford .............. 85.6
Springfield ............. 91.0
Indiana
Fort Wayne............ 80.5
Indianapolis ........... 94.0
Iowa
105.5
Cedar Falls/Waterloo ...
80.7
Cedar Rapids .........
90.0
Davenport .............
86.0
Des Moines ...........
97.0
Sioux City .............
78.1
Bloomington ..........
105.5
Duluth .................
79.6
Minneapolis ..........105.3
✓
Rochester ............100.5
St. Cloud ..............
77.5
St. Paul ................
99.5
Missouri
Kansas City ........... 97.2
St. Joseph ............. 91.0
St. Louis ..............100.3
Nebraska
Lincoln ................ 78.2
Omaha ................ 94.0
Source: U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics and Robert Half. City index figures are reflective
of all industries and not specific to accounting and finance. For more information on average starting salaries
in your city, please contact the office nearest you.
For regional information on in- demand positions and growing industries, as we# as our Salary Calculator,
please visit roberthalf.com/Sa/arycenter.
-1987-
23 2012 Salary Guide - Robert Half <
•
•
•
Exhibit C (3)
•
(SAMPLE OF ONE OPTION TO INVESTIGATE SALARIES)
CITY OF MOUND, MN
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION
0 AND COMPENSATION STUDY
Proposal Due Date: XAX p.m.
0
CITY OF MOUND •
,r 5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Office (952) 472 -0600
FAX (952) 472 -9720
Employee Classification and Compensation Study
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
The Request for Proposal documents can be downloaded from the City's website at
www.ciiyofmound.com You may also request a copy from the Finance Director's Office by calling
(952) 472 -0633 Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00 am to 4:30 pm.
Proposals should be mailed or hand delivered to:
City of Mound
Attn: City Manager, Kandis Hanson
5341 Maywwod Road, Mound, MN 55364
Proposals must be received by X:XX p.m. on XX/XX/XX in order to be considered.
Additional information and submittal instructions may be obtained by contacting Catherine •
Pausche, Finance Director at (952) 472 -0633.
Proposals shall be submitted in a sealed envelope, clearly marked on the outside:
EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION & COMPENSATION STUDY
Proposals received after the time and date noted above will be declared non - responsive and
returned to the submitter unopened. The City reserves the right to reject any or all of the
proposals if the best interests of the City will be better served thereby.
The City of Mound does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex,
religion, age or disability in employment or the provision of or contracting for goods or services.
MBE/WBE firms are encouraged to participate in the City's procurement process.
1 013'11
CITY OF MOUND REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS EMPLOYEE
• CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY
Thank you for your interest in submitting a proposal to perform an Employee Classification and Compensation
Study for the City of Mound.
INTRODUCTION
The City of Mound requests proposals from qualified firms experienced in the design of position classification
and compensation systems. The selected firm will consider the objective of the City and recommend changes
necessary to establish and maintain an equitable and easy to administer classification and compensation
system for approximately 11 City of Mound salaried employees in FLSA exempt positions.
The current compensation system has been in use since 1999 when the State of Minnesota Pay Equity
requirements were implemented. The City of Mound currently offers a complete benefit package
including Medical, Dental, Vision, and EAP for employees and for dependents. State Retirement, Section
125 Cafeteria Plan, Life Insurance, Long -Term Disability, and an optional Deferred Compensation Plan,
• among others.
OBJECTIVE
The City desires to enter into a contract with a highly qualified and experienced consulting firm for the
purpose of conducting an Employee Classification and Compensation Study. The Study will assist in the
development and implementation of a salary administration program that will enable the City to
competitively recruit new employees, retain our current workforce, and motivate employee job performance.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Approximately 11 full time salaried positions are part of this project including the following:
• City Manager
• City Clerk
• Finance Director
• Community Development Director
• Public Works Director
• Public Works Superintendent
• • Public Works Supervisor
• Liquor Store Manager
• Assistant Liquor Store Mann-
• Fire Chief -1990-
• Police Chief
Salaried city employees are not represented by a labor union and are not subject to a collective
bargaining agreement. •
The City of Mound utilizes a 6 -step salary schedule with 6% increments between steps. (See Exhibit 2).
Employees are eligible for up to a 6% step increase on an annual basis until they reach the top step of their
classification's range. Employees who are at the top of their classifications salary range are eligible for the
general wage increases that the labor unions are awarded.
PRODUCT OUTCOMES
To achieve the desired results, the consulting firm selected to conduct the classification and
compensation study will be expected to deliver the following services:
• An update of all position descriptions to accurately reflect the actual duties and responsibilities
performed by current incumbents, identification of essential job functions, and recommendations for
classifying each position as exempt or non - exempt.
• A compensation and classification analysis that includes a survey of wages and benefits for
comparable cities and private sector employers.
• A compensation and classification analysis that addresses the issue of internal equity. •
• A compensation plan that is easily integrated into the City's existing model.
• A pay structure that includes a recommendation for recognizing and rewarding increased
competencies, skills, and/or performance or recommendations where positions need to be reclassified to
better reflect job duties and complexity
A classification system, which can be maintained on a long -term basis.
• Presentations to employees, managers, and/or elected officials. The Consultant may propose additional
tasks as deemed necessary to complete the assignment. REQUIRED PROPOSAL
CONTENTS/EVALUATION CRITERIA Please respond to each section fully and completely in order to
assure that your firm receives full credit when your proposal is reviewed and rated by the City of Mound.
Proposal/Consulting Firm
1. Legal name of consulting firm
2. Mailing and street address
3. Telephone number
4. Name of authorized representative
U
-1991-
5. Title of authorized representative
• 6. Signature of authorized representative
Consulting Firm Qualifications (please limit to two pages excluding resumes)
• Experience in conducting similar studies in the State of Washington.
• Experience in classification and compensation management consulting.
• Experience in evaluating compensation systems for internal equity.
• Accomplishments in developing classification and compensation plans for public
employers.
Project Manager Qualifications:
Please address the following points, unless the qualifications of the firm and the project manager are
one - and - the -same:
• Experience in conducting similar studies in the State of Minnesota.
• Experience in classification and compensation management consulting.
• Experience in evaluating compensation systems for internal equity.
• Accomplishments in developing classification and compensation plans for public
employers.
•
Evaluation of System Validity and Content (limit to two pages excluding resumes)
Describe how the consultant proposes to do the study. Include descriptions and documentation of proposed
methodology. Describe and outline the tasks that the consultant believes are necessary to complete the study.
Study Schedule Include proposed timeline, dates, and milestones. Indicate which tasks the project manager
will perform and which may be performed by the other consultant staff. Explain in detail what, if any, work
the City Staff will be required to perform. Employee Relations Provide proposed employee information plan
for educating City employees during the study and provide proposed methods for informing and educating
City employees regarding the results and validity of the study after it has been completed. Availability of
Consultant Firm In light of your firms other business obligations, indicate the extent of the firm's and project
manager's availability to perform the study.
r]
-1992-
Project Cost
Please provide a detailed project budget. •
Sample of Job Incumbent Questionnaire
Please provide the proposed questionnaire to be used by the consultant to document job content.
TIME TO COMPLETE PROJECT
Successful Bidder will be expected to commence the project on or about XX/XX/XX with final written
recommendations to the City not later than XX/XX/XX. A project timeline is to be included in the proposal.
CITY'S RIGHT TO ACCEPT OR REJECT PROPOSALS
The City reserves the right to accept or reject any and all proposals or waive technical errors and
informalities in the best interest of the City, and reserves the right to interview one or more firms prior
to making its selection.
DELIVERY OF PROPOSAL
Each proposal shall be completely sealed in a separate envelope, properly addressed to the City at the address •
indicated with the name and address of the firm on the outside of the envelope.
One Original and three (3) copies are to be submitted.
Proposals shall be typed or printed in ink. Use of erasable ink is not permitted. Proposals must be received by
the time specified. It shall be the sole responsibility of the firm to ensure that the sealed proposal is submitted
by the time and date specified. Any proposal received after the appointed time shall not be accepted under
any circumstances. Such proposals will be returned to the firm unopened. Any uncertainty regarding the
time a proposal is received shall be resolved against the firm.
SELECTION CRITERIA
The submittals will be reviewed and rated on the following criteria:
• Professional qualifications of assigned staff.
• Experience in similar types of work/projects.
-1993-
- Experience in working with employee groups, management and elected officials to provide
• education about the background, process and outcomes of the project.
- Documented history of the firm to accomplish similar projects within time limits.
- Documented history of the firm to complete similar projects within budget limits.
- Accessibility of firm.
is
-1994-
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 23, 2012
To: City Mayor and City Council
From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Treasurer
Subject: Contract for Law Enforcement Services with the City of Orono
The press release that was issued on August 21 st is attached as it lays out the entire sequence
of events that has cumulated with a proposed contract for law enforcement services from the City
of Orono. The contract from Orono reflects standardized language and dispute resolution
procedures that exist in other contract for services between cities. It has been reviewed by the
City attorneys, Shared Service Committee Members, and the council members of both
communities. The Mound Council is asked to vote on the contract at the August 23` meeting for
all of the reasons laid out in the press release as well as the implications for the 2013 preliminary
budget and levy that will be approved at the September 11 meeting.
At the August 16 Public Forum, Staff was requested to provide further information on
response times and shift coverage. It should be noted that we are adding our 10 officers for a
total combined department of 27 sworn officers. Our coverage and response resources can only
get better. Please see the attached memo from Interim Police Chief Dean Mooney on the subject.
Staff acknowledges the recent opposition to this contract and does not believe this reflects the
sentiments of the broader community. The July Mound "City Contact" Newsletter was mailed to
every home and two pages were devoted to the subject of contracting for police services. Ample
press coverage has been given on the topic since 2011. Little or no feedback was received
except from the individuals who have written to the editor and have appeared at the workshops
and public forum. It is the City's obligation to deliver services as efficiently and cost effectively
as possible. Our officers have clearly stated that the uncertainty is worse than the actual decision
and we know we would have difficulty replacing them if they were to move on to other
opportunities. In that event, the costs of hiring, recruiting, equipping and training new officers
would be expensive, and qualified officers would be hesitant to join a department whose future is
so uncertain.
Now is the time to focus on the benefits of this contract, for which there are many, and the
need to bring decisive closure to the issue. Staff appreciates the energy and thought the Council
has put into this decision and asks that you let us know in advance of Tuesday if there is any
other information that needs to be provided.
•
is
•
-1995-
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
• Kandis Hanson
City Manager
952 - 240 -5244
August 21, 2012
A public forum was held on the proposed contract for police services with the City of Orono on
Thursday, August 16 The City Council will vote on whether or not to approve the Contract for Law
Enforcement Services by the City of Orono at the Tuesday, August 28 City Council meeting.
The City Council has been evaluating its options for public safety services since early 2011. On October
29, 2011, the Council received the recommendations of Emergency Services Consulting International,
who performed a feasibility study for shared or cooperative law enforcement services between the
cities of Mound, Minnetrista and St. Bonifacius. That study concluded a consolidated police department
would be better because a larger department allows for more scheduling flexibility, supervisory
coverage, and better operational, investigative, and administrative capabilities. Mound recognized it
will be able to attain the same or enhanced coverage while saving money.
Discussions with Minnetrista followed and Minnetrista presented Mound the framework for a contract
for police services. The Mound Council held special workshops to discuss the proposal on April 11 and
May i which included public input. The Council determined three requirements that had to be met to
• proceed with discussions:
• The savings for Mound must be 10 %+ or an average of $200,000 annually (i.e., a compelling
savings) to consider contracting for services with another department
• The police service levels and programs must be maintained
• Mound officers must be treated fairly in the process
When Minnetrista and Mound failed to reach agreement on some of these requirements, negotiations
were suspended and the public was notified via a joint press release issued on June 12, 2012. Mound
followed with another press release on June 18, 2012, to clarify some issues and state that the City of
Mound will continue to evaluate its options for policing. The press release also stated the City
recognizes the need to bring closure to this issue and set the course for the department for the next
decade and beyond. According to City Manager Kandis Hanson, "Much was learned from our
discussions with Minnetrista and this will aid in a more expedient decision in the near future."
Mound approached the City of Orono in June about the possibility of a contract for police services.
Progress was made and hurdles were quickly overcome to bring forward an agreement that met the
three requirements stated above. In addition, other barriers were worked out with the union members.
When a viable agreement looked plausible, the Mound Study Committee embarked on a communication
• plan which included a two -page Question and Answer insert in the Mound "City Contact" newsletter
that was mailed to residents on July 23, 2012. In addition, a press release was issued on August 6th
-1996-
inviting the residents to a Public Forum on the police contract for services proposed by Orono that was
scheduled to take place August 16` All of this information is available on the City's website at •
www.cityofmound.com
The public forum on August 16` lasted more than three hours. A Power Point presentation by the
Interim Police Chief, Dean Mooney, assisted by Finance Director Catherine Pausche and Orono Police
Chief Correy Farniok, summarized the background of this study, including the reasons for the need for
cost savings and the highlights of Orono's proposed contract for police services. The entire meeting may
be viewed on the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission website (www.lmcc - tv.org).
Two Mound police officers spoke in support of the change; a third spoke supportively but suggested
that the public weigh in on a decision. The Mayor of Spring Park, Sarah Reinhardt, gave testimony of her
satisfaction with the level of police services provided by the Orono Police Department. Current and
former police department employees spoke, as well 11 members of the public.
Although some of the speakers requested, and the Council discussed, a possible public referendum on
the contract, the Police Study Committee is recommending the Mound City Council proceed with a vote
on the contract for police services with the City of Orono based on the following reasons:
• Attendees praised the quality and professionalism of Chief Correy Farniok and the Orono Police
Department. •
• The three main requirements of the Mound City Council have been met by Orono.
• Delaying this action will increase the level of uncertainty for the police officers, possibly
motivating them to seek employment elsewhere. It would be very difficult to fill open positions
in this environment.
• Orono is not interested in a protracted decision as that creates uncertainty for their officers.
• Mound's contracts with the patrol officers and police supervisor's unions expire December 31.
• The Police Chief and Lieutenant positions are currently vacant. Interim Police Chief Dean
Mooney's commitment ends at one year. It takes up to six months to hire a full -time chief.
• The unions have reached the agreements necessary under the proposal. Mound officers stand
to get a wage increase, have more promotional opportunities, and a higher level of street
supervision under the contract for services.
• Contract for services succeed if they are executed in an environment of mutual trust and
partnership.
• Failure to approve the proposed contract will significantly increase taxes needed to restore and
sustain law enforcement services in Mound.
Decisions of this magnitude will always bring about public debate. How to provide for public safety at a
sustainable cost is a debate going on all across the country. Potential savings in other services provided
by the City have and will continue to be explored. Ironically, the savings from a contract for police
r�
6�10IN
services are primarily derived from sharing the salary of a Police Chief and Lieutenant with Orono, in
i s other words, Police Department "management salaries," which are the focus of some of the public.
Circumstances beyond anyone's control (i.e., an international financial crisis) caused Mound's tax base
to erode by 40% between 2009 and 2013, which will result in the Mound tax rate to surpass 50% in
2013. Even so, the City's bond rating remained at AA Stable because, to quote Standard and Pool's
Credit Analyst:
"Mound's economic indicators remain very strong, in our view, despite recent declines in the tax -base
valuation."
In addition, the report stated:
"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the city will maintain balanced operations and very
strong reserves."
The City of Mound Council and management are committed to seize all possible opportunities to deliver
services as economically and efficiently as possible, without compromising quality. Residents can expect
continued initiatives to reinvent the way the City delivers services to ensure Mound continues to grow
and prosper in the next century of our City's history.
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 23, 2012
To: Mayor and Council
From: Dean Mooney, Interim Police Chief
Subject: Police Response Times
At the August 16 meeting, the Council requested additional information on
comparative response times for Priority 1 (Emergency) calls in Mound vs. Orono. In
2011, Orono Police averaged 5.7 minutes and Mound Averaged 4.1 minutes response
time for Priority 1 Calls. It is important to point out that Orono has a response area of 26
square miles and the City of Mound is 3 square miles which explains the difference. The
proposed policing plan will add 10 Officers to the combined department, while adding
only 3 square miles to the response area. This disproportionate addition of officers to the •
new response area of 29 square miles will allow for better zone distribution of police
squads, which will maintain the excellent response times in the Mound area, while
improving response times for the department as a whole (see Police Zone map). When
coverage is down to 3 cars, each zone will have a Squad assigned. As coverage increases
to 4 -5 cars, the additional cars will be available to assist in any zone where additional
help is needed.
It should also be noted that the Mound Police Station will be maintained as a base of
operations for the Mound zone car in the new zone configuration. This will allow Mound
to maintain the relative advantage of service and response times we currently experience.
I would point out that response times will vary due to factors such as traffic density,
weather and road conditions, street reconstruction, and dispatching procedures.
Finally, I would caution the Council not to consider response time as the supreme
indicator of police service. Having police officers well led, trained, equipped and
motivated will be the ultimate determiner of police service. This is clearly the case with
the Mound and Orono Police Departments. While no one would argue that response times
are not significant, it is clear the current response times of both departments are excellent,
and are comparable to those of surrounding jurisdictions.
•
-1999-
� §� .
R
qG
!-l!
��
\ \w °�
10
�
�� � �
�� �
��� \ \
» � .:
\ \� �
\�
��
�
�^
�
R
qG
!-l!
��
\ \w °�
10
CONTRACT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
•
This CONTRACT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES ( "Contract ") made and
entered into this day of , 20_, by and between the CITY OF ORONO
( "Orono "), a Minnesota municipal corporation, and the CITY OF MOUND ( "Mound "), a
Minnesota municipal corporation.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Mound is desirous of contracting with Orono for the performance of law
enforcement services within Mound; and
WHEREAS, Orono is agreeable to render law enforcement services on the terms and
conditions hereinafter set forth; and
WHEREAS, a contract such as this is authorized under and by virtue of the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59;
NOW, THEREFORE, Orono agrees that it will provide law enforcement services for
Mound on the following terms and conditions and Mound agrees as follows:
1. Duration of Contract The term of this Contract is for ten (10) years commencing on
January 1, 2013. This Contract will automatically renew for a period of five (5) years, •
unless Orono or Mound provide notice, no later than three (3) years prior to the
expiration date of the original or renewed contract.
2. Cost of Services In consideration of furnishing law enforcement services under this
Contract, Mound shall pay Orono the following:
A. Year 1 (2013), Initial base cost of $1,545,000.00
B. Years 2 -5, cost increases annually by 2.5%
C. Years 6 -10, cost to increase by Minneapolis -St. Paul CPI -U (with a minimum
percentage to be no less than 1% and a maximum cap of 5 %)
The payments shall be made in equal installments on January lst and July 1 St of each year.
If this Contract is automatically renewed for five (5) years, the Minneapolis -St. Paul CPI -
U shall be used in determining the annual increase of each of those years. Capital
equipment and headquarter related expenses are included in the base contract cost.
Mound shall provide satellite station services at Mound's expense in the lower level of
2415 Wilshire Blvd., Mound, on a 24/7 basis.
3. Conversion Costs Mound shall pay conversion costs in an amount not to exceed
$80,000, excluding severance related expenses to Mound employees. Orono shall submit
proposed conversion costs to Mound in writing and Mound shall have five (5) business
0
-2001-
165904
days to object to the costs in writing or the costs shall be deemed approved. Conversion
• costs may be incurred anytime between the period this contract is approved and 12/31/13.
Mound will provide clear title to Orono for nine (9) vehicles, fully equipped. In addition,
Mound will provide tactical and other miscellaneous equipment it currently owns that is
to be scheduled and that is deemed necessary by Orono for performing services outlined
in this Contract. The PCs that are housed in the Mound satellite station for use by the
officers shall be supported and replaced as deemed necessary by Orono at Orono's
expense. Internet access at the Mound satellite station will be provided by Mound at
Mound's expense. In the event of termination of this contract by Orono within years 1 -
3, Orono shall return all in -kind equipment, or the equivalent.
4. Staffin .
Orono will hire Mound employees listed on the attached Exhibit A. Orono will recognize
the years of service for the Mound Police Department for purposes of compensation and
applicable benefits. Upon employment, Orono will credit Mound employees with their
accrued vacation time as of December 31, 2012 but shall not exceed 80 hours. Upon
employment, Orono will credit Mound employees all accrued sick leave through
December 31, 2012. Upon employment, Orono will not credit accrued compensation for
Mound employees.
Mound agrees to pay Mound employees for all accrued vacation and comp time owed
pursuant to Mound personnel policy and collective bargaining agreement less any hours
• transferred to Orono. Mound will fund carried -over vacation and sick time as set forth in
Exhibit A.
Mound agrees to pay for all legal fees and unemployment expenses incurred by Orono
resulting from the discipline or termination of an employee listed on Exhibit A during
2013.
Upon the termination of this Contract, Mound shall be responsible for fifty percent (50 %)
of unemployment expenses because of the need to lay off existing police department
personnel.
5. Services Provided Orono agrees to furnish law enforcement services to Mound 24
hours per day, seven (7) days per week. The level and delivery of service provided to
Mound will be comparable to the level and delivery of service provided in Orono,
including similar response times and clearance rates. The list of services to be provided
is contained in Exhibit B. In addition, the Orono Police Chief will be the Director of
Emergency Management and will coordinate emergency plans for Mound.
6. Joint Police Commission Mound may appoint two volunteer members to the Joint
Police Commission and the name of such appointees shall be furnished to Orono
Administration. The Joint Police Commission shall meet periodically, and at least
quarterly, to discuss and make recommendations regarding concerns or problems
• identified regarding the provision of police service.
-2002-
165904 2
7. Administrative Responsibility The law enforcement services rendered to Mound shall •
be under the sole direction of Orono. The degree of services rendered, the standards of
performance, the hiring and discipline of the officers assigned, and other matters relating
to regulations and policies, shall remain in the control of Orono.
Orono and Mound will work cooperatively to respond to Mound data practices requests
as it pertains to police records and police requests for information.
8. Officers, Employees of Orono Officers assigned to duty in Mound shall be police
officers of Orono. Orono shall assume all obligations with regard to workers
compensation, PERA, withholding tax, insurance, etc., arising from the employment of
such officers, except as set forth in Section 4 of this contract. Mound shall not be
required to furnish any fringe benefits or assume any other liability of employment to any
officer assigned to duty within Mound unless Mound employs officers directly,
independent of this Contract, to provide special law enforcement services in Mound. In
such event, all obligations and liabilities with respect to employment of special law
enforcement officers shall be the complete responsibility of Mound. No such direct
employment shall be entered into by Mound without first obtaining written approval of
the City Administrator of Orono whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
9. Enforcement Policies. Orono's Police Department Policies, Rules and Regulations and
Code of Conduct shall prevail as the enforcement policies within Mound.
10. Enforcement of Laws and Ordinances of Mound Orono shall be familiar with the •
Mound City Code and shall assist Mound personnel in enforcing the City Code as
requested. Mound will continue to retain Community Service Officers on its staff to be
the primary personnel to enforce the Mound City Code. Orono is authorized to and shall
enforce Mound's City Code and all other applicable and/or appropriate federal and state
laws, to the extent appropriate for enforcement by police officers.
11. Headquarters Headquarters for the services furnished to Mound under this Contract
shall be located at 2730 Kelley Parkway, Orono, Minnesota 55356. In addition, Mound
will provide a satellite office for patrol officers to use at their discretion. The satellite
office will be located in the lower level of 2415 Wilshire Blvd., Mound.
12. Prosecution and Revenues. Mound shall be responsible for the cost of prosecution of
violations which occur within the Mound City limits. In addition, any court fines
received related to violations which occur within the Mound City limits shall be remitted
to Mound. All board of prisoner fees related to violations within Mound City limits shall
be paid by Mound. P.O.S.T. board reimbursements and drug forfeiture funds will be
retained by Orono. Mound will receive 4/9 of the Crime Levy for the 2012/2013 school
year and Orono will receive 5/9 of the payment. Future Crime levy will be retained by
Orono. Police State Aid received by Mound in 2013 will be paid to Orono for the
amount of state aid that pertains to Mound officers hired by Orono. In the event of
termination of this contract, Orono will pay Mound the Police State Aid received the 0
-2003-
165904
following year that pertains to any Orono officers hired by Mound or its contracting
• agency.
13. Cooperation and Assistance from Mound_ Orono and Mound shall have full
cooperation and assistance from each others officers, agents, and employees.
14. Dispute Resolution and Arbitration In the event that a dispute arises under this
Agreement, the following procedures shall be followed in an attempt to resolve the
dispute prior to the parties commencing arbitration.
A. Dispute Resolution Procedure
Step 1. Disputes related to services being provided under this Contract shall be first
brought to the immediate attention of the Orono City Administrator for resolution.
Step 2. If the dispute remains unresolved after the proceeding through Step 1, it shall
be brought before the Orono and Mound Joint Police Commission for resolution.
Step 3. If the dispute remains unresolved after proceeding through Step 2, it shall be
brought before the city councils of both cities in a joint city council meeting for
resolution.
B. Arbitration
If the dispute remains unresolved after proceeding through all of the above steps,
either party may submit the dispute to binding arbitration. The parties shall select an
arbitrator that is mutually agreed upon by both parties. If the parties are unable to
• agree upon an arbitrator, they shall each select an arbitrator for a panel and the two
arbitrators selected shall select the third arbitrator. Arbitration shall be completed no
later than sixty days from the date that the dispute is submitted to arbitration. The
arbitrators' expenses and fees, together with the other expenses, not including legal
counsel, accounting or consultant fees, incurred in the conduct of the arbitration, shall
be divided equally between the parties to the arbitration. Each party to the arbitration
will pay its own attorney, accountant or consultant fees. The arbitrator(s) shall not be
empowered to terminate this Contract under any circumstances.
15. Hold Harmless and Indemnification. Orono shall maintain general liability insurance
for its services and shall include Mound as an additional insured for the term of this
Contract and any extensions thereof. Orono shall provide Mound proof of such insurance
coverages and the additional insured endorsement naming Mound upon request.
Orono agrees to defend and indemnify Mound against any claims brought or actions filed
against Mound or any officer, employee, or volunteer of Mound for injury to, death of, or
damage to the property of any third person or persons, arising from Orono's performance
under this Contract. Under no circumstances, however, shall Orono be required to pay on
behalf of itself and Mound, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466, applicable to any one party. The limits of liability for
Mound and Orono may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of
liability for Orono. The intent of this subdivision is to impose on Orono a limited duty to
• defend and indemnify Mound for claims arising out of the performance of this Contract
W111TA
4
165904
subject to the limits of liability under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. The purpose of
creating this duty to defend and indemnify is to simplify the defense of claims by is
eliminating conflicts between the parties and to permit liability claims against both
parties from a single occurrence to be defended by a single attorney.
Nothing herein shall be construed to waive or limit any immunity from, or limitation on,
liability available to either party, whether set forth in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 or
otherwise.
This is a service contract. The parties do not intend to undertake or create, and nothing
herein shall be construed as creating, a joint powers agreement, joint venture, or joint
enterprise between the parties.
16. Entire Agreement This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties
and supersedes and replaces any prior agreement between the parties on the same subject.
17. Amendment. This Contract may be amended only with the written approval of both
Mound and Orono.
18. Assignment. The rights and obligations under this Contract will not be assigned, and
Orono will not subcontract for any services to be furnished to Mound (except as
otherwise provided in this Contract), without prior written consent of the other party.
Orono agrees that it will not enter into any agreement for services with other •
communities which will adversely impact any services provided in this Agreement to
Mound. Mound acknowledges that Orono provides law enforcement services for Spring
Park and Minnetonka Beach, which also have representatives on the Joint Police
Commission described in Section 6.
19. Notices. Written notices and communication required to be given under this Contract are
to be in writing and sent by U.S. Mail or fax addressed:
If to Mound: City Manager
Mound City Hall
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
If to Orono: City Administrator
Orono City Hall
PO Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
The parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above stated.
•
-2005-
165904
rI
U
I*
Dated: , 20
Dated: , 20 By
CITY OF ORONO
By
Lili McMillan, Its Mayor
Jessica Loftus
Its City Administrator
The above Contract ws reviewed and approved by the City Council for the City of Orono, by
Resolution No. , dated , 20_
CITY OF MOUND
Dated: , 20
By
Mark Hanus, Its Mayor
Dated: , 20
By
Kandis Hanson, Its City Manager
The above Contract ws reviewed and approved by the City Council for the City of Mound, by
Resolution No. , dated , 20_
165904
-2006-
6
o0 00 00 0�
o
�* m M
q � tn N .�
� y
0000 Q\ M 00 O �o O 00 O
00 h
o a o er r o o m to m er y
ou �-
� w
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O of "o 'IO 'O N N N oo U
d' 00 M M M M M M N C\
�aN ��� CN 0 p � p
Cd �
d 3
� o 0 0 0 0 0 0
"C O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
O C
Gz1 U ' o O
� RT
> Y c M
.2 m .
0D w O Wn 't V m kn
y y .-•� � t� M m l� �C oo �t N D,
N M C o0 N m C� oo k i N ,o N h w
r- N c� — O N M �-o r- N "0 v �r
(UN C n r-
a v a .- •-+ N N -- M N
"It N I�O M M M M '"' ll 00
ce
to a N O O\ . M 00 M 00 l0 M .4 M Cd
U y N
w irr O O N d m 0# O
M M l- %o 1 .0 �O O O O et } > O U a U
O rq
O O P,+ M M M Cl) M M M M M M v w w y Q
� O O M U ' 00 O b Q a
'3 z
Cd kn U Cd G p
o0 � N t� �O l� O � N �/'1 � �
cV C y
W) m et v) o �o 00 U
� � y N N •--i .� .� �n � O p .N-.
u 00 U
•�,� � � .Nr U O y M
C� cq V O
C p N
co
-+ N it vl �O [� 00 01
-2007 * 3
G
cq
K�
Qq
U �
Q
N
w > O
O
y N
a
� o �
C� N ya4 U
II O
N
U ,>, O
b C
O
O p
z m x H
c
e0
O
e
0
0
b
.i
V
y
69
C
�4
L
U
W CO
> C
y
c
h
� O
O
d •
b
U
w
v
b
a y
..
O ~
U �
O O
Ix
A
0
L1.
d
C
O
C
D
co
w
4
O
C
i
O
o •
U
W
O
z kn
EXHIBIT B. Services to be Provided by Orono to Mound
PATROL DIVISION COMMUNITY POLICING
•
Calls for service /law enforcement TRIAD - a senior citizen crime prevention program
•
•
Traffic Control
Virtual Crime Prevention Block Club - an email notification system
DWI Enforcement, including Safe & Sober/Nite -Cap subject Non - profit advisory groups - officers and staff participate on
to funding advisory boards
Police Chaplains - local pastors work with officers to provide care
Business Checks and services to persons in traumatic situations
Neighborhood Patrol
Security detail - special events
Medical emergencies
Police Explorers as feasible
Ordinance enforcement (excluding Zoning Code)
INVESTIGATIONS
Participate in West Metro Drug Task Force subject to
funding
RESERVE OFFICER UNIT
Prisoner transports
Emergency call -outs
Traffic control at car accidents and special events
Special event security
House Checks
ADMINISTRATIVE
DARE Program as requested by Westonka School District Scheduling
School Resource Officer subject to funding Training plan / POST credits
Crime -Free Multi Housing Program Finances and Budget/Capital/Fleet
Citizen Academy (periodically) Grants management
Prosecution support
Emergency Preparedness
Evidence/Property Room
Data practices /privacy compliance
Social service contracts - Corner House, Sojourner
Reporting
Forfeitures
11:
1659042
MEMORANDUM
•
Date: August 21, 2012
To: City of Mound Dock and Commons Commission
From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Treasurer
Subject: Villa Dock Fees for 2013 and beyond
The City of Mound issued $4.02M in General Obligation TIF bonds to finance the clean-
up of the Lost Lake dump site and dredging of the channel in order to ready it for redevelopment.
With the recession that followed, available tax increment is currently not sufficient to provide for
the debt service on the bonds, nor will it be for the uncertain future (see page 2 for an
explanation of "TIF. ")
In 2009, the HRA and the City of Mound entered into an agreement to authorize an
interfund loan in order to allow the City to use funds other than available tax increment to make
the required payments on the bonds. The available tax increment continues to fall short as
redevelopment has stagnated and land values have declined in the Lost Lake District.
Therefore, in addition to the amount the City of Mound is levying to make principal and •
interest payments on the 2009D bonds, we are proposing to set -up an interfund loan using Villa
Dock revenues to also contribute to the debt service. This loan would be subordinate to the debt
levy interfund loan, but in the event that available tax increment is sufficient, amounts would be
repaid to the Dock Fund Escrow Account in order to help fund future dredging of Lost Lake.
We are proposing to increase the Villa Dock Fees from the current $800 per slip plus
$348 escrow fee (Total $1,148), to a total of $2,500 for 26' slips and $2,700 for 30' slips. The
$348 will continue to be contributed to the escrow accounts as well as a portion to pay for the
LMCD fee, insurance and water /electric provided to the slips. We approximate $75,000 will be
available after these expenses to be used to partially fund the interfund loan to pay debt service.
We feel this is an appropriate source of funds as these docks would not exist but for the
funding of the dredge and dump site clean-up. We believe these rates are still competitive with
comparable slips in the area and anticipate all docks will be rented, although perhaps some going
to non -Mound residents. The 2013 budget for docks reflects a break -even budget and a copy is
attached for the DCC's review.
We request the DCC recommend the City Council implement the interfund loan using excess
Villa Dock revenue to help fund the debt service on the 2009D bonds.
•
-2009-
•
Tax Increment Financing, or TIF, is a public financing method that is used for subsidizing
redevelopment, infrastructure, and other community- improvement projects.
TIF is a method to use future gains in taxes to subsidize current improvements, which are
projected to create the conditions for said gains. The completion of a public project often results
in an increase in the value of surrounding real estate, which generates additional tax revenue.
Sales -tax revenue may also increase, and jobs may be added, although these factors and their
multipliers usually do not influence the structure of TIF.
When an increase in site value and private investment generates an increase in tax revenues, it is
the "tax increment." Tax Increment Financing dedicates tax increments within a certain defined
district to finance the debt that is issued to pay for the project. TIF is often designed to channel
funding toward improvements in distressed, underdeveloped, or underutilized parts of a
jurisdiction where development might otherwise not occur. TIF creates funding for public or
private projects by borrowing against the future increase in these property -tax revenues
The Mound Harbor Renaissance TIF District was created in 2005 and encompasses the Lost
Lake District (Phase I), the Auditor's Road District (Phase II) and the Langdon District (Phase
III). The tax capacity at the time was $65,205, which becomes the frozen base. Anything over
that for the life of the district is distributed to the City. The county, school district and special
• taxing districts forgo their share in exchange for higher tax values when the district expires.
The district "expires" or decertifies in 2031. Any tax increment that is received between now
and 2031 can be used to pay -off the bonds and payback the interfund loans. It is anticipated
that the Dock Fund may not be paid back until the end of the TIF district, if at all. If
redevelopment continues to lag, we may lose out on potential tax increment. Improvements need
to occur within the first 10 years of the district to be eligible tax increment.
L�
-2010-
City of Mound
Villa Docks - Sources and Uses
Comparison of other slips offered in the area:
Slip Length
Howard Point,
Shorewood
2013 •
Dock Rental Fee - 26' Slip x 20 @ $2,500 per slip
$
50,000.00
Dock Rental Fee - 30' Slip x 17 @ $2,700 per slip
$
45,900.00
Total Sources (Revenues)
$
95,900.00
Property in the open insurance on the docks
$
5,195.88
Electric for Villa Docks
$
1,300.00
Water for Villa Docks
$
200.00
LMCD Fee
$
766.06
Slip Maintenance Escrow ($84 x 37)
$
3,108.00
Channel Maintenance Escrow ($132 x 37)
$
4,884.00
Shoreline /Dock Maint Escrow ($132 x 37)
$
4,884.00
Total Uses - Dock Fund
$
20,337.94
Amount Remaining = Interfund Loan
$
75,562.06
Comparison of other slips offered in the area:
Slip Length
Howard Point,
Shorewood
Chapman Place,
Cooks Bay
Average
Proposed 2013
Lost Lake Docks
Qty
Total
Revenues
26'
30'
All rented?
3,995
4,995
Yes
2,690
3,090
Yes
3,343
4,043
2,500
2,700
20
17
50,000
45,900
95,900
Villa 2012 $ 1,148 37 $ 42,476
•
•
-2011-
w O� , n N 0 a 00 00 n � 00 N N V) w ,n
00 O� O O W
e
�D er a C, 't d' •O -• — -• -• �D O�
C, N n
N b �O
M» M of b h M 00 b M O a Ni n N o0 V) O �o
h w 00 O+ M h N n M
A N N N M M �f M N N N N N N -
� W O W) wl b 00 N
n �O �D -• h O n N 1 N V1 O O� oo �O Q\
O� vi M r` O� �D t` N h N O N eF O �D O h N vi N
'7 . h ON O O O O O O O N N N N N N N
N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
M
n
h
00
C
w
O
a
3
'C
7
w
Y
0
s
U
3
a
o a
O
a w
b r7 Q
O y y
0
v q��
7 �
0 0 0
*4
E O
a ��cyG
.
S O 0 O
M O+ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q
O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O c�
h V1 , n , n v1 h N Vt Y1 V1 V'j V1 Vl V1
V
M
V o l
�
y ° "CO
e�
a
d
a��'SSSS ° SSSSS
000000000OOOO
o:
e EN N , n n hh00 � n00 n o000
N N N N N N N N N N
y
06
0
M N O� c M
0o a ri •.: oo" vi vi O ri oo O N 4
8
►w
L
V
. ' . . ' ' . . . . .
,n •
S S O S O O
Y
07 a
^�
Q
H
a`
° o
e
-.t -It \D -• —
n N �D N oo h o0 vl O, It 10 to a M N O Q\ w n �D C� N
00 O+ N b
n O N %C C� V) rn O N O lG � O, h
'a
1 " O O 0 0 0 C S O O O S O O O O O O O O
Q
b �T .hi o0 N N N N N 00 0 M M C M N N N N N N
a U
� L
p
0 0 ,n O , n 0 0 0 , n
N N N M
Y ai
7 C O
O Y
N N N N M
M (IJ
e
•
�• .D .h. NMm
N N N N N N N M M
y$ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
d
-2012-
• C ,
00 N O+ 00 O O p O O 0 0 O C O p 0 0 0 0 O O
O+ 00 et O O ppp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pp
C C C C C C 0 0
Q
Jr
h et , n C C C 0 C C C C C C C C
O� O h vi m vn vi vi h vi vi h vi vi ,n vi vi O O O O O
N
•
M
w •V N N n O� O4 -n 11 N N n N h h N N M �D n h N 00 N
N -� N N N M M M M M N N N M M M N N N N N
a
U$
M
n
h
00
C
w
O
a
3
'C
7
w
Y
0
s
U
3
a
o a
O
a w
b r7 Q
O y y
0
v q��
7 �
0 0 0
*4
E O
a ��cyG
.
S O 0 O
C C 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
h V1 , n , n v1 h N Vt Y1 V1 V'j V1 Vl V1
�
z
e�
a
d
a��'SSSS ° SSSSS
000000000OOOO
o:
e EN N , n n hh00 � n00 n o000
N N N N N N N N N N
C
y
8
►w
L
V
. ' . . ' ' . . . . .
S S O S O O
Y y O h o O O o O O O O
�
a`
° o
e
-.t -It \D -• —
n N �D N oo h o0 vl O, It 10 to a M N O Q\ w n �D C� N
00 O+ N b
n O N %C C� V) rn O N O lG � O, h
W D a m D t- M o0 'O M 'C 0± D\ N n O± O e! m t` N oo vi O,
Q
b �T .hi o0 N N N N N 00 0 M M C M N N N N N N
a U
� L
Y ai
7 C O
O Y
O _
►. QUO ^��M oO �,O N C-4 ,n \D r- Go
M (IJ
e
•
�• .D .h. NMm
N N N N N N N M M
y$ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
-2012-
M
n
h
00
C
w
O
a
3
'C
7
w
Y
0
s
U
3
a
o a
O
a w
b r7 Q
O y y
0
v q��
7 �
0 0 0
*4
E O
a ��cyG
ol
-2013-
8/21/2012
DOCKS
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2013
CODE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
APPROVED REQUESTED
PROPOSED
•
REVENUE
34705
LMCD FEE
6,217
6,338
6,463
6,200
6,350
6,350
2%
34715
PUBLIC LAND STRUCTURES PERMIT
0
0
0
0
0
0
34725
DOCK PERMITS
111,163
96,110
106,645
103,240
103,240
103,240
0%
34735
MULTIPLE SLIP PERMITS
33,700
29,325
34,625
36,075
36,000
36,000
0%
34737
VILLA SLIP REVENUE (Less escrows)
19,425
27,750
29,600
29,600
7,357
7,357
-75%
34745
WAIT LIST FEE
2,900
2,960
2,840
2,500
2,500
2,500
0%
36200
OTHER
0
0
377
0
0
0
36210
INTEREST
882
180
175
200
150
150
-25%
39101
SALES OF GENERAL FIXED ASSETS
380
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL REVENUE
174.667
162.663
180,725
177.815
155,597
155.597
-12%
EXPENDITURES
101
SALARIES, REG.
29,618
29,979
11,157
10,884
46,102
46,102
324%
102
OVERTIME, REG.
0
113
12
0
0
0
#Dlviol
103
SALARIES, PART -TIME
39,864
40,626
53,600
58,337
20,450
20,450
-65%
121
PERA/FICA
6,530
7,007
9,142
9,226
3,614
3,614
.610
131
HOSP. /DENTAL
2,221
1,669
1,528
1,508
1,376
1,376
-9%
134
LIFE INS. /DISABILITY INS
44
42
54
52
53
53
2%
136
POST RETIREMENT
356
374
447
435
444
444
2%
151
WORKERS /UNEMP COMP INS
1,344
987
1,702
2,420
2,420
2,420
0%
200
OFFICE SUPPLIES
372
270
490
500
500
500
0%
202
COPY MACHINE FEES
912
504
711
1,100
1,100
1,100
0%
205
COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE
-808
410
3,003
500
0
0
- 100%
210
OPERATING SUPPLIES
0
331
116
200
200
200
0%
ol
-2013-
8/21/2012
8/23/2012
DOCKS
2009
2010
2,011
2012
2013
2013
CODE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
APPROVED REQUESTED PROPOSED
•
212 MOTOR FUELS
3,545
1,780
1,350
1,850
1,850
1,850
0%
220 f EPAIR/MAINT. SUPPLIES
1,161
3,149
1,365
2,500
2,500
2,500
0 %.
223 BUILDING REPAIRS
1,125
1,125
560
1,190
1,190
1,190
0%
300 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
264
0
919
1,000
500
500
-60%
301 AUDIT AND FINANCIAL
1,286
1,463
1,060
1,200
1,200
1,200
0%
307 ADMIN SUPPORT & OVERHEAD
8,775
8,775
8,775
8,800
8,800
8,800
0%
321 TELEPHONE
648
647
541
750
0
0
-100%
322 POSTAGE
1,311
817
888
1,400
1,400
1,400
0%
331 USE OF PERSONAL AUTO
269
278
0
0
0
0
351 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS
1,336
43
43
1,000
500
500
-60 %.
361 GEN. LIABILITY INS.
6,704
7,004
6,991
6,900
6,900
6,900
0%
381 ELECTRICITY
2,516
2,493
1,646
1,460
1,800
1,800
23%
383 GAS SERVICE
2,965
2,650
1,200
1,200
1,200
1,200
0%
384 GARBAGE SERVICE
2,877
2,877
1,100
1,100
1,100
1,100
0%
400 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
0
26,817
4,094
0
0
•
404 AUTO EQUIP. REPAIR
1,940
1,940
990
990
990
990
0%
409 OTHER EQUIP. REPAIR
2,180
2,180
710
710
1
7 0
710
0
0%
430 MISCELLANEOUS
174
98
162
650
650
650
0 %.
431 MEETING EXPENSES
0
308
130
130
130
130
0%
433 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
0
90
90
90
90
90
0%
434 CONFERENCE & SCHOOL
129
430
480
630
630
630
0%
439 LMCD FEES
5,971
6,573
6,642
7,000
7,000
7,000
0%
440 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
11,825
12,359
12,580
15,000
12,800
12,800
-16%
500 CAPITAL OUTLAY
33,143
14,898
4,938
950
7,275
7,275
666 %.
OTHERIMPROVEMENTS
525 (RIP -RAP, DECK REPLACEMENT)
12,000
0
118,662
2,700
12,200
12,200
362%
533 TREE REMOVAL
6,300
0
6.519
9,500
7.000
7.000
-26%
TOTAL
188.897
181,106
264.397
153.862
154.674
154.674
1%
REVENUE OVER(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
- 14,230
- 18,442
- 83,672
23,953
923
923
-96%
FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1
CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
50,000
0
UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE
189,736
225.506
207.063
181.950
147.344
147.344
TOTAL FUND BALANCE - JANUARY 1
239,736
225,506
207,063
181,950
147,344
147,344
•
FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31
CAPITAL RESERVE FUND BALANCE
0
0
0
UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE
225.506
207.064
123.391
205.903
148.267
148.267
TOTAL FUND BALANCE - DECEMBER 31
225,506 - 2014_)64
123,391
205,903
148,267
148,267
8/23/2012
MEMORANDUM
August 23, 2012
To: City Mayor and City Council
From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Catherine Pausche, Finance Director/Treasurer
Subject: Request from LMCC to Raise PEG Access Fees
Background. The Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission has asked the City of
Mound to become a full member of their commission as is the case with the other cities serviced
by the LMCC. The LMCC holds the cable franchise agreements with Mediacom for all of the
other cities, whereas Mound holds their own, collects the fees and pays a portion to the LMCC.
The LMCC provides all of the services a member city would receive to Mound, including
television production resources, taping /televising/streaming of city council meetings, and
programming that promotes Mound and the entire area.
•
As a compromise in light of the economic challenges Mound is facing, the LMCC has requested
that in addition to a 5% increase over the amount budgeted for cable TV services in 2012, they •
would like us to increase the Public, Education and Government (PEG) access fee from the
current $.84 per month to $1.21 per month and pass on the entire amount to the LMCC. The net
effect of these requested changes would be:
The Council is asked to direct Staff to prepare an amendment to the Local Programming
Facilities Agreement with the LMCC based on the outcome of your discussion.
•
-2015-
Requested
Proposed
2013
Changes
2013
Change
5% Franchise Fees
103,974
-
103,974
-
PEG Fee per Subscriber
21.887
9.641
31,528
9.641
Total Revenue
125,861
9,641
135,502
9,641
Amount Paid to LMCC
41,429
41,429
-
+ 5%
2,071
2,071
2,071
+37 incr in PEG Fee
-
9.641
9.641
9,641
Total Expenditures
41,429
11,712
53,141
11,712
Net Revenue (Expense)
84,432
(2,071)
82,360
(2,071)
The Council is asked to direct Staff to prepare an amendment to the Local Programming
Facilities Agreement with the LMCC based on the outcome of your discussion.
•
-2015-
• LC"CWCWLAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
4071 SUNSET DRIVE . BOX 385 - SPRING PARK, MN 55384 -0385 - 952.471 .7125 . FAX 952.471 .9151 ■ IMCCOIMCC- tv.org
DEEPHAVEN August 22, 2012
EXCELSIOR Mayor Mark Hanus and Mound City Council
City of Mound
GREENWOOD 5341 Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364
INDEPENDENCE Hear Mayor Hanus and Mound Council,
LONG LAKE LMCC Chair, Doug Franchot, recently spoke with Catherine Pausche concerning the
Mound usage agreement for the community television- studio with the LMCC.
LORETTO
The Local Programming Facilities Agreement was entered into in April of 2000.
MAPLE PLAIN Since that time a number of things have changed. The LMCC raised its PEG fee from
• $.50 cents to $.85 cents some years ago and did not request a similar increase from
MEDINA Mound. According to the agreement a per subscriber formula was agreed to so that
Mound was contributing all of their PEG fee and a portion of their franchise fee due to
MINNETONKA the fact that Mound's PEG fee was $.84 cents at that time. Also, since then we have
BEACH added streaming and agenda parsing, services which were not available in 2000. This
was a considerable expenditure. The LMCC, at the Full Commission Meeting of
MINNETRISTA August 21 voted to increase the LMCC PEG fee to $1.20.
ORONO Chair Franchot had discussed with Catherine Pausche the consideration by Mound to
raise the Mound PEG fee from $.84 cents to $1.21 to bring Mounds contribution more
ST. BONIFACIUS into parity with the contributions by LMCC subscribers. This could be accomplished as
an amendment to the 2000 agreement. Ms. Pausche informed us that this request would
SHOREWOOD be included on Mound's 8/28/2012 agenda. A representative of the LMCC will be
present at that meeting.
SPRING PARK The LMCC would be interested at some future date in reviewing the Local Programming
Facilities Agreement with our respective attorneys to determine what may need to be
TONKA BAY updated.
VICTORIA S' erely,
WOODLAND ally enecke
LMCC Executive Director
-2016-
Date: August 23, 2012
MEMORANDUM
To: City Mayor and City Council
From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Catherine Pausche, Finance Director/Treasurer
Subject: 2013 Preliminary Budget Assumptions
Staff will present a recommended preliminary budget and levy for 2013 on September 11,
2012. The following facts will necessitate an increase to the General Fund Levy in 2013:
• The 2011 and 2012 budgets did not factor in a general wage increase, and with the recent
arbitration decision to grant 1% as of 7/1/11 and 1% as of 1/1/12, wages and
corresponding benefits will rise.
• The City budgeted a use of reserves in 2012 of $149K and needs to return to break even
budgeting as the fund balance approaches the 20% unassigned target set by the Council.
•
• Assumptions were made for the 2012 budget in order to mitigate the effects of the new
Market Value Homestead Exclusion program that resulted in an increase in taxes for a •
portion of the tax base. We increased our tax capture assumption from 82% to 87% and
do not anticipate being favorable in tax receipts as has occurred in the past.
Staff is recommending a 3% increase to the General Fund levy for 2013. Even with the
increase, the need to find additional savings will be necessary. In order to present a balanced
preliminary budget, Staff would like the Council to approve of the following budget
assumptions:
• $50,000 in revenue will be budgeted for the transfer of liquor store profits to the General
Fund to defray general property tax increases
• Only the transfer for the Mound portion of the Area Fire Services fund will be budgeted
in expenses. The Seal Coat program will only be funded with the $60K of MSA funding
for 2013.
• The remaining amount needed in order to produce a break -even budget will be budgeted
in Revenue as equipment certificates for an amount not to exceed the amount of vehicles
and equipment budgeted.
It is Staff's intention that we will continue to find savings in order to reduce reliance on
equipment certificates and allow for surplus funds to increase funding for the seal coat program.
Staff requests the Council provide feedback on these initial budget assumptions.
•
-2017-
•
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 23, 2012
To: City Mayor and City Council
From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Catherine Pausche, Finance Director/Treasurer
Subject: RFP for Prosecution Services
The Staff would like to do a targeted Request for Proposal for prosecution services for firms
that currently serve Hennepin County cities. We would specifically look for attorneys that have
broad experience in criminal prosecution and enforcement in civil administrative matters.
Our current provider is Craig Mertz, who has represented the City for many years and will be
• invited to submit a response to the RFP. The current arrangement is a fee for service and the
City has become aware of some firms that are willing to put an annual not to exceed amount in
exchange for a multi -year contract with the City.
Please see the attached Request for Proposal for Prosecution Services. Staff recommends the
Council direct staff to issue this for services to begin on or before January 1, 2013.
•
-2018-
REQUEST FOR SERVICES FOR PROSECUTION SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF
MOUND, ISSUED SEPTEMBER 15, 2012 •
Approved for services in years 2013 — 2015
Purpose of Request (RFP)
The City of Mound is requesting proposals from experienced law firms for municipal prosecution
legal services. The law firm requesting consideration must have special knowledge and experience in
the area of criminal law. Detailed information concerning the City's needs is outlined in the
following sections of this RFP.
Submission Instructions
All proposals should be sent and all questions and correspondence should be directed to:
Catherine Pausche
Finance Director
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Questions and correspondence can also be sent via e-mail to catherinepausche @cityofmound.com or
through direct contact via telephone at (952)472 -0633.
A. IN ORDER TO ENSURE A FAIR REVIEW AND SELECTION PROCESS, LAW FIRMS •
AND /OR ATTORNEYS SUBMITTING PROPOSALS ARE SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED
FROM CONTACTING OTHER STAFF AND COUNCILMEMBERS REGARDING THESE
PROPOSALS. ANY LAW FIRM THAT DOES NOT ABIDE BY THIS PROHIBITION WILL
BE PRESUMED TO HAVE WITHDRAWN ITS PROPOSAL BY SO DOING, AND WILL NOT
BE CONSIDERED.
B. Submittals must be received by 4:00 p.m. on September 7, 2012 at the City of Mound City
Hall.
C. The City will not reimburse any expenses incurred by the responders including, but not limited
to, expenses associated with the preparation and submission of the response and attendance at the
interviews.
D. Proposals will be accepted for municipal prosecution services.
City of Mound Background
The City of Mound is located in western Hennepin County and is a fully developed city with a
population of approximately 9,000. It is a Plan B statutory city with a Council - Manager form of
government. The City has 41 full -time and various regular /seasonal part-time employees, and a 2012
General Fund budget just under $5.8 million. •
-2019-
• The City BCA crime statistics have been included for consideration.
Timetable for evaluating RFPs
A. Submittals must be received by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, October 26th, 2012 at the Mound
City Hall.
B. An evaluation committee composed of two Council members, the City Manager, Interim
Police Chief, and other City staff, as deemed appropriate, will review responses, identify
finalists and schedule interviews with finalists, if appropriate.
C. After completing a review of responses to this RFP and after conducting any appropriate
interviews, the evaluation committee will prepare a report for consideration of the City
Council in November 2012. The report will include a recommendation(s) for future
• prosecution legal services.
D. The City Council is expected to act on the recommendation(s) in November 2012.
E. It is the goal of the City Council that a new contract for municipal prosecution legal services
would have an effective date on or about January 1, 2013, provided it can be accomplished
through a reasonably smooth transition plan.
Proposal Contents
A. Transmittal Letter: A signed letter of transmittal briefly stating the firm's understanding of
the work to be performed, the commitment to perform the work within requested time periods, a
statement expressing why the firm believes that it is best qualified to perform the engagement and a
statement that the proposal is a firm and irrevocable offer.
B. Title Page: Show the RFP subject, the name of the proposer's law firm, street and Email address,
telephone and fax numbers, name of contact person, and the date.
C. Table of Contents: Include a clear identification of the materials by section and by page number.
•
-2020-
D. Law Firm Background
1 Provide information on the number of years in business under this name, areas of •
expertise and general services available.
2 Discuss the Firm's specific qualifications for the performance of municipal
prosecution legal services and years of experience with this form of legal services. List
relevant CLE attendance and professional association activities dealing with prosecution
legal service
3 For each of the past 5 years, specify the number of municipal criminal charges
prepared and the number of municipal criminal court processes conducted with statistical
breakouts akin to those provided in the "City of Mound Background" section of this RFP.
4 Identify who would primarily serve as the City Prosecutor and who would be
primarily responsible for the management and administration of a contract with the City (if
different). Discuss the experience and qualifications of the individuals for these roles. List
the current principal responsibilities of these individuals and include a statement of
assurance as to future availability.
5 Specify office location to be used for support of municipal prosecution legal
services and describe office organization. Describe specific services that will be provided
by each paralegal and support staff member and provide estimate of percentage of time
expected to be spent in an `average' workweek in support of the prosecution legal services
contemplated in this RFP.
6 Discuss the Firm's approach toward communication with the City's Police
Department and methods used to convey information and training on new rulings, trends,
and other prosecution considerations. How will the Department's service expectations be •
identified, monitored and addressed?
7 The City's Police Department interaction with municipal prosecution legal
services includes heavy use of shared law enforcement data bases and information systems,
templates for efficient forms preparations, and data transfer systems that enable secure
electronic transmission and receipt of all criminal files, including audio and video
recordings, photos and other evidence. Submittals for this RFP should clearly demonstrate
an ability to `meet or exceed' these current capabilities. Please also specifically comment
on the Firm's current use and capabilities in the following areas:
❑ Phone, voice and e-mail systems and applications;
❑ Computerized legal research;
❑ Obtaining criminal history documents /records and gun permit
registrations from the BCA; •
-2021-
❑ Obtaining certified driver's license and registration
• documents /records from Driver and Vehicle Services;
❑ Data Transfer Systems, including ability to share and edit documents
electronically, including transmittal of police reports, including audio and
video recordings, photographs, and other evidence, and complaints between
city and your office, also identify any necessary software or hardware which
city would be required to have in order to accomplish this;
0 Familiarity with the LOGIS Records Management System
0 Implementation of electronic filing and electronic signatures for court
documents.
❑ Ability to access to MNCIS and other court date, regarding Order for
Protection's, pending cases, and juvenile data.
E. Staff Qualifications
I Identify each attorney, paralegal and support personnel who will be supplying
services for which the City may be billed and list the relevant academic training and
degrees for each individual. The submission of resumes is encouraged.
2 List the billing fee for each individual. If hourly rates apply, please identify the
rate.
3 Discuss prior prosecution experience in the areas covered by your proposal for
each individual. Describe any other individual background or experience in the area of
• municipal criminal prosecution.
4 Specify the proposed allocation of work between the proposed City Prosecutor,
other senior partners, junior partners, associates, or paralegals.
5 Identify any malpractice claims and/or ethics complaints /investigations
undertaken over the last five years against your law firm or any attorney, paralegal or
support personnel who will be supplying services pursuant to the proposed contract for
municipal prosecution legal services. Discuss the status of outcomes for any such action.
6 Indicate whether any action is pending or is currently under review by the Office of
Lawyers Professional Responsibility or any other ethics board.
F. References Provide the names and telephone numbers of at least five client references. At least
two references must be from municipal clients, who received professional services from the
proposed staff members that were similar to those proposed in this RFP.
•
-2022-
G. Conflict of Interest
1 Indicate whether designated personnel and/or the law firm represent, or have •
represented any client which representation may conflict with your ability to serve as City
Attorney.
2 Indicate whether designated personnel or the law firm currently represents any
other local units of government having jurisdiction within, or contiguous to, the City of
Mound.
3 Indicate whether the designated representative and/or the law firm represent or
have represented individuals in any matters against the City of Mound.
4 Indicate whether designated personnel and/or the law fire represent or have
represented any union that is in a collective bargaining contract with the City.
5 Indicate whether the designated personnel and/or the law firm represent
individuals as defense attorneys for criminal cases.
H. Core Municipal Prosecution Legal Services Requirements Core municipal prosecution
legal services requirements include but are not limited to the following:
1 Prosecution of gross misdemeanors, misdemeanors and petty misdemeanor cases •
including traffic violations, DWI cases, theft and City code violations and civil forfeiture
cases.
2 Drafting of complaints, representing the City at court appearances, including
omnibus hearings, pretrial conferences, court and jury trials and post- conviction hearings.
Preparation of regular reports of prosecution activities.
4 Working with appropriate personnel on all law enforcement activities.
5 Training of police personnel on law related matters including report writing,
legislative changes, and general police /prosecution relationship issues.
Approach to scope of work
1. The law firm's proposal should include an indication on whether and to what extent the
law firm is capable and interested in providing the services listed above in the Core
Services sections.
•
-2023-
J. Billing of Services The City will require the selected law firm to document all services
• according to task performed and project area. All fees and charges shall be separately accounted.
1 Indicate the dollar amount of fixed and/or hourly fees and costs your firm will
charge for providing the legal services covered by your proposal. For the hourly fees
portion of your proposal, identify the hourly rate of each attorney, paralegal, and support
personnel.
2 Identify the minimum increment of time billed for each service including phone
calls, correspondence and personal conferences.
3 Identify additional cost items to be billed (e.g. travel, photocopying, faxes, law
research searches, subpoena service, etc.) and associated rates.
4 Identify compensation for handling of civil forfeiture cases (e.g. percentage or
fee).
5 The City is interested in exploring fee arrangements other than a retainer or hourly
rate. Indicate what alternate billing arrangements you would be willing to consider and
under what circumstances they would be applied.
0 K. Disclosure and Assurances Compliance with EEOC — The City of Mound, Minnesota has
adopted a policy that it will not discriminate in equal employment practices on the basis of race,
color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, sexual orientation, public assistance
status, or disability; and that it will transact business only with law firms who have adopted similar
non - discriminatory practices.
L. Insurance coverage Please document and attach current insurance coverage and limits,
including professional liability insurance.
M. Applicant authority Please provide assurance that the signatory making representations in the
proposal on behalf of the proposer has the authority to do so and to bind the law firm to a contract.
N. Contract Ethics
1. No elected official or employee of the City who exercises any responsibilities in the
review, approval or implementation of the proposal or contract shall participate in any
decisions, which affects his or her direct or indirect personal or financial interest.
•
-2024-
2. It is a breach of ethical standards for any person to offer, give or agree to give any City
employee or City Councilmember, of for any City employee or Councilmember to solicit, •
demand, accept or agree to accept from another person or law firm, a gratuity or an offer of
employment whenever a reasonably prudent person would conclude that such
consideration was motivated by an individual, group, or corporate desire to obtain special,
preferential, or more favorable treatment than is normally accorded to the general public.
3. The law firm shall not assign any interest in this contract and shall not transfer any
interest in the same without the prior written consent of the City.
4. The law firm shall not accept any client or project, which places it in a conflict of
interest with its representation of the City of Mound. If such a conflict of interest is
subsequently discovered, the City shall be promptly notified, and the law firm shall
address the conflict in accordance with the Code of Professional Responsibility.
O. Terms and Conditions
1. The City reserves the right to reject any and/or all proposals, and is not bound to accept
the lowest cost proposal if that proposal is deemed by the City to be contrary to the best
interests of the City.
2. It is the intention of the City to maintain the contract period for up to three years, with •
annual reviews of performance conducted by the City Council, with input by the City
Manager and management team.
3. The City reserves the right to cancel or amend the RFP at any time.
4. The City reserves the right to determine the successful respondent.
5. Upon submission, all proposals become the property of the City, which retains the
right to use any ideas presented in any proposal submitted, whether or not the proposal
is accepted.
6. For the purpose of this agreement, the law firm shall be deemed to be an independent
contractor, and not an employee of the City. Any and all agent, servants, or employees of
the attorney, or other persons, while engaged in the performance of any work or services
required to be performed by the City under this agreement, shall not be considered
employees of the City of Mound and any and all claims that may or might arise on behalf of
the City, its agents, servants, or employees as a consequence of any act or omission on the
part of the law firm, its agents, servants, employees or other persons shall in no way be the
obligation or responsibility of the City. The law firm, its agents, servants or employees
•
-2025-
shall be entitled to none of the rights, privileges, or benefits of
• City employees except as otherwise may be stated herein.
7. Apart from the proposals, the City will negotiate a separate fee agreement with the
chosen law firm to be executed before the effective date of representation.
•
-2026-
•
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 23, 2012
To: City Mayor and City Council
From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Catherine Pausche, Finance Director/Treasurer
Subject: Metro Cities Membership Request
Please review the attached handouts on Metro Cities Mission and Objectives, Committees,
Reasons to Join and the Board of Directors Roster as well as a list of member cities.
Representatives from Metro Cities pay an annual visit to the City of Mound requesting our
participation.
During this year's visit, we focused on the issues the City encountered with the Met Council •
with respect to the comp plan amendment required for the Walgreens Development. Metro Cities
would have helped to navigate the City through that process as well as attend meetings and
determine where the hang -ups were. In addition, Metro Cities serves as a watch -dog to Met
Council and tries to ensure they are living within their statutory authority. They represent the
City's perspective as to affordable housing unit requirements, unfunded mandates, and
infrastructure /transportation implications of the Met Council's decisions.
If the city were to join, the dues for 2013 would be $1,868.00. This figure represents an
introductory discount of 50% for new members for the first year (without the discount, dues
would be $3,736.00). The dues are calculated at roughly half of League of MN Cities dues, and
are adjusted for population. The City of Mound was previously a member before ending its
participation in 2005.
Staff requests the Council to decide if 2013 Metro Cities Membership should be included in
the preliminary budget assumptions.
•
-2027-
C M4 ETR0
TIES
of Muiruyoldun Munioix 6!ia
Metro Cities Mission and Objectives
Metro Cities (created in 1974 as the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities) primary
objective is to be an effective voice for metropolitan cities at the Legislature and
Metropolitan Council, so as to influence state legislation affecting metro area cities, and
regional policies that accommodate the needs of metro area cities
Metro Cities is the only metro -wide entity that lobbies and monitors the Metropolitan
Council, and the only region -wide organization representing cities before the Legislature
and Executive Branch
Metro Cities represents 84 member cities, comprising 90% of the region's population,
including the core cities, inner ring and developing communities, before the State
Legislature and Metropolitan Council
Metro Cities provides a forum for bringing city officials from across the region together
to share ideas and experiences and works to foster open lines of communication
between city officials and officials at the state and regional levels of government
Metro Cities lobbies on a wide range of policies, over 60 in all, including transportation,
local government aids and credits, wastewater, redevelopment and housing. Legislative
policies are developed by consensus of our membership. Policies are recommended
annually by four policy committees comprised of local elected and appointed officials;
policy recommendations are subsequently approved by the Metro Cities Board of
Directors and general membership
Metro Cities works in collaboration, when appropriate, with the League of MN Cities and
other city advocacy groups on behalf of our rnembers
The Association is governed by a 19 -mer nber Board of Directors, comprised of local
elected and appointed officials who represent a cross- section of our membership, and a
four person staff, including an Executive Director, two government relations specialists
and office manager
Metro Cities has statutory authority to make appointments to the Metropolitan Council's
Transportation Advisory Board (TAB), Technical Advisory Cornmiftee JAC), and the
Metro Geographic Information Syste m,s (GIS) Board, and convenes the election of city
members to the Grant Evaluation Ranking Svstein (GEARS) C:ornmittee
Other Metro Cities services include regular on -line newsletters, legislative alerts, a
legislative bill tracking system, and License /Permit Fee and Salary Surveys
r�
-2028-
METRO CITIES
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities •
Metro. Cities Legislative Policy Committees
Metro Cities' policy committees annually develop policy recommendations based on
input from member city representatives . Committees submit policy recommendations to
the Board of Directors for review, modification and distribution to the general
membership. The membership meets in November, prior to the legislative session, to
debate and adopt Metro Cities' policies.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *4z * 3:****************** 41 * * * 4; ** * * * *4: * * * * * *4* * ** * * * * * **
Metropolitan Agencies
This committee considers issues related to the Metropolitan Council and monitors the
structure and relationship between local and regional units of govei anent. The
committee has developed policies regarding land use planning, inflow and infiltration,
water supply, the sc%ver availability charge (SAC), the Met Council's selection process,
livable communities, and density. •
Municipal Revenues
This committee considers any matter relating to city revenues, property taxes and city
expenditures, including state aids and credits, levy limits, property tax relief programs,
assessments, fiscal disparities and the state and local fiscal relationship.
Housing &Economic Developmem
This committee considers all issues related to economic development, redevelopment,
and housing. It has developed policies around government's roles in affordable housing,
foreclosures and neighborhood stabilization, Met Council's housing goals, and tax
increment financing.
Transportation & General Govertttnent
This committee considers all issues related to transportation and transit in the
metropolitan area, including; funding sources. The committee has developed policies on
the metro -wide sales tax, photo enforcement of traffic lays, street improvement districts,
rental housing ordinances, and administrative fines.
•
145 University Ave. 1v, St. Taut, MN 55303 -2044 Phor,9Vi9 IS -4000 Fax: 651 -281 -1294 www.MetroCitiesMN.org
With 84 metro area city members, Metro Cities delivers a comprehensive metro-
wide message to the Legislature, Governor and Metropolitan Council
Created in 1974, Metro Cities is the only city advocacy organization that monitors
the Metropolitan Council
Metro Cities' policies cover a broad range of issues ranging from transportation to
levy limits to housing and economic development to wastewater treatment, which
means greater influence on a wide array OfiSSUCS
Committee members from the core cities, developed suburbs and developing cities
create Metro Cities' policies by consensus
•
Statutory appointing authority to the TAB and TAC mean municipal influence oil
regional transportation spending exceeding $100 million per year
Close ties with the League of MN Cities means coordinated and cooperative
legislative platforms and lobbying efforts
Low overhead means Ave can keep dues affordable while providing full attention to
mernbcr concerns and a maximum return on investment
Important services including the I- icense & Permit Fee Survey and the MN Local
Government Salary & Benefits Survey mean added value for your membership
clues
Patricia, Todd, Charlie: & Laurie brIng over 80 veays of cornbined legish-aive, local
government. co I'll In unit v development, and ii experience and are
courteous, kind, trustworthy, cheerful and thrifty
•
A 19-member Board comprised of a mix of elected officials and professional
a
managers means balance between importnt. political and practical management ,
solutions to metro area problems
-2030-
ETRO T
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities •
Board of Directors 2012-2013
PRESIDENT
Mark Sather
City Manager
White Bear I:,ake
VICE PRESII)I',1`rT
Susan Arntz
City Administrator
Waconia
PAST PRESIDENT
Douglas Anderson
Mayor
Dayton
DIRECTORS
Bryan Bear I lirabetli Glidden Steve Schmidt
City Administrator CounC]lnlember Councilmember
Hugo Minneapolis Anoka
Mark Bernhardson Dean Johnston Ed Shukle
City Manager Mayor City Administrator
Bloomington bake Elmo Jordan
Amy Brendmoen Darlene Lewis Brad Wiersurn
Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
St. Paul Nest St. Paul Minnetonka
Bob Bruton Scott Lund Pierre Willette
Councilmember Mayor Gov't Relations Rep.
North St. Paul Fridley Minneapolis
Ultan Duggan
Councilmember
Mendota Heights
Vicki Ernst
Councilmember
Chanhassen
Anne Mavity
Counciln lember
St. Louis Park
Doug Meniklieim
Counc.1I1.T1(mber
Stil lwater
U
145 University Ave W., St. Paul. MN 55103 Phone: (651) 215 -4000 Fax: (651) 281 -1290 w\vNV.MetroCi6esMN . ora
-2031-
Metro Cities Membership 2012
44. Marine on St. Croix
45. Medicine Lake
46, Mendota Heights
47. Minneapolis
48. Minnetonka
49. Minnetonka Beach
50. Minnetrista
51. New Brighton
52. Newport
53. North St. Paul
54. Oak Park Heights
55. Oakdale
56. Orono
57. Osseo
58. Plymouth
59. Prior Lake
60. Richfield
61. Robbinsdale
62 Rogers
63. Rosemount
64, Roseville
65. St. Anthony Village
66. St. Francis
67, St. Louis Park
68. St. Michael
69. St. Paul
70. St. Paul Park,
71. St. Paul Port Authority
72. Savage
73. Shakopee
74. Shoreview
75. Shorewood
76. South St. Paul
77. 'Spring Park
78. Stillwater
79, Sunfish Lake
80. Victoria
81, Waconia,
82. West St. Paul
83. White Bear Lake
84. Woodbury
-2032- *=Affiliated Member Updated: 3115112
1.
Andover
•
2.
3.
Anoka
Apple Valley
4.
Arden Hills
5.
Bayport
6. :
Blaine
7.
Bloomington
S.
Brooklyn Center -
9.
Brooklyn Park
10.
Burnsville
11.
Carver
12.
Champlin
13.
Chanhassen
14.
Chaska
15.
Circle Pines
16.
Coon Rapids
17,
Corcoran
18.
Cottao Grove
19.
Crystal
20.
Dayton
•
21,
22,
Eagan
Edina
Elko New Market
24.
Excelsior
5.
Falcon Heights
26.
Forest Lake
27.
Fridley
28.
Golden Valley
29.
Hanover
30.
Hastings
Hopkins
Flugo
33.
Independence
34.
Inver Grove Heights
35.
J ordan
36.
Lake-Flino
37.
Lake St. Clroix Beach
38.
Latiderdale
39.
Lilydale
41.
Long Lake
Mahtornedi
42.
Maple Plain
43.
Maplewood
44. Marine on St. Croix
45. Medicine Lake
46, Mendota Heights
47. Minneapolis
48. Minnetonka
49. Minnetonka Beach
50. Minnetrista
51. New Brighton
52. Newport
53. North St. Paul
54. Oak Park Heights
55. Oakdale
56. Orono
57. Osseo
58. Plymouth
59. Prior Lake
60. Richfield
61. Robbinsdale
62 Rogers
63. Rosemount
64, Roseville
65. St. Anthony Village
66. St. Francis
67, St. Louis Park
68. St. Michael
69. St. Paul
70. St. Paul Park,
71. St. Paul Port Authority
72. Savage
73. Shakopee
74. Shoreview
75. Shorewood
76. South St. Paul
77. 'Spring Park
78. Stillwater
79, Sunfish Lake
80. Victoria
81, Waconia,
82. West St. Paul
83. White Bear Lake
84. Woodbury
-2032- *=Affiliated Member Updated: 3115112
Approved Minutes
CITY OF MINNETONKA BEACH •
Dakota Trail Town Hall Meeting Minutes
Monday June 11, 2012
Mayor Anderson called the Town Hall Meeting to order at 6:07 p.m.
Present: Mayor Anderson, Council Members; Bartel, Kroll, Ferguson, and Treasurer Skalla. Absent:
Council Member Mike Taylor
Staff Present: City Administrator Griffin, Public Works Director Young, and City Clerk Tiegs- Roussell
Guests: Three Rivers Park District Representatives Boe Carlson and Hugo McPhee. City of Orono
Police Chief Cory Farniok.
Residents: Jodi Schwendimann, Patty Rezabek, Serene Warren, Betsy Taylor, Amy Melin, Tom
Schriefer, Joe Pagano, Nick Pagano, Mary McCarten, Jaci Lindstrom.
Mayor Anderson began the meeting with introductions of Three Rivers Park District (TRPD)
Representative Boe Carlson and TRPD Director of Public Safety Hugo McPhee along with Orono Police
Chief Cory Farniok. Mayor Anderson addressed residents stating the trail has been in use for the past
three years. She invited them to share their thoughts and concerns regarding their experiences with the
Dakota Trail.
TRPD Representative Carlson addressed Minnetonka Beach Residents by stating the importance of the
trail and that it has become very popular. The trail usage continues to increase from the projected 70,000 •
visits to the current 400,000 visits annually. As the trail continues to be developed further west it will
come closer to the McLeod County border when two 6 -mile segments are completed over the next couple
of years. Parking continues to be a challenge and TRPD is making an effort to add parking spaces for
trail users. A cost share project is in the works between the City of Mound, TRPD, and Hennepin County
addressing a crossing issue on County Road 15 to realign and make changes for safety improvements at
the crossing. Vegetation control, pet issues, refuse, and policing continue to be part of the trail
management.
Public Safety Director McPhee of TRPD told residents that currently 8 -10 hours of patrol time is
scheduled for the Dakota Trail daily during the summer months. On the problem crossings i.e. Shoreline
Drive, County Road 19, and Orchard Road a squad watches the area. In 2008, 14 park contacts; 2009, 26
park contacts; 2010, 44 contacts and; 2011, 38 contacts with trail users. These contacts were to warn and
educate trail users and currently for 2012 there have been 4 contacts. Stop signs on the trail are not
obeyed and citations are issued for reckless riding. The stop signs are not enforceable so more time is
spent at County Road intersections to issue warnings and citations.
Orono Police Chief Farniok stated they concentrate on the crossings due to difficulty enforcing the
driveway stop signs due to difficulty in following bicyclists on the trail. The Tour de Cure Race held the
first weekend in June was poorly organized. Minnetonka Beach did not approve the permit for use of the
trail but riders still used the trail due to poor communication from the organizer to participants stating the
expectations. There is conflict at times among the multi -users which include the cyclists, walkers, and
runners.
Resident Patty Rezabek:
•
Dakota Trail Town Hall Meeting Minutes Jun(-2033-.2
Approved Minutes
• • Is disappointed because there are safety incidents that are not documented, so there is not a true
picture of what is actually happening on the trail.
• Have limited trail usage because of exchanges with the fast bicyclists. They have an attitude of
entitlement and are not respectful to the walking users.
• There have been injuries and due to that, does not use the trail as much.
• The buckthorn removal efforts late winter and early spring were good; however, there are
concerns along the Arcola Lane area before the bridge. The removal has opened steep
embankments and sharp tree trunks from the buckthorn removal and possible erosion along that
embankment. The area is not safe.
Mayor Anderson relayed Resident Pam Schultz:
• There is an urgent need to slow down the bikers. She would rather her children play on the street
because it is safer than riding on the trail due to the high speed of the bikers.
Resident Jodi Schwendimann:
• Resident Schwendimann would like consideration given to an actual stoplight that pedestrians
activate to safely cross County Road 15 at Lafayette Road. She would like to have something put
in the City Capital Improvement Program.
• Mayor Anderson responded that the Civic Committee has put a stoplight in their CIP.
Mayor referenced the young girl that was killed walking her bicycle on Hwy 101 this past month and
feels it relates to the situation here in Minnetonka Beach. This incident illustrates the dangers of crossing
County Road 15 and the need for something to be done for the safety of our residents.
• TRPD Representative Carlson stated the bridge did not materialize, the tunnel was given some support by
TRPD, but Hennepin County needs to participate in the discussion and there must be qualifying criteria to
warrant a stoplight. Minnetonka Beach needs to initiate by sending a letter of request to Hennepin
County. Orono Chief of Police Farniok stated that due to the curving of the road in that location there is
not a long enough site line. This is an issue for the County to agree with the installation of a stoplight.
Resident Mike Bloom
• Has a love /hate relationship with the trail and at the same time it is a wonderful amenity that he
uses daily.
• The noise from living next to the trail is irritating, each morning he wakes up to the pound of
running feet, talking, etc. which is very disappointing when a resident cannot open windows or
keep drapes open. The trail has impacted resident lives negatively and he would rather have a
railroad track.
• In the past three years there has been little progress towards the big issues.
• There is the same number of police but the trail user numbers are five times the expectations and
the resources committed made to the City of Minnetonka Beach have not been supported
appropriately.
• The TRPD Police Officers on the trail have not been good stewards or lead by example. Mr.
Bloom routinely observes the TRPD Officers blow through drive -way stop signs. The TRPD
employees on the trail do not move over for people nor do they pick up obvious debris.
• Employees could be helping clean the trail and be more involved. He has never heard the
statement that the stop signs are largely unenforceable.
• Administrative tickets can be issued but when challenged they are difficult to prosecute in court.
• There is not enough enforcement and education must be done.
• Mr. Bloom stated that the signage on the trail just on Northview Road alone has 20 signs and
• further on there are another 15 signs which is overload.
Dakota Trail Town Hall Meeting Minutes Jun - 2034 -12
Approved Minutes
• TRPD removed trees but some trees removed were healthy and should be replaced. Also there •
are trees that were planted by TRPD that are dead and need to be replaced as well.
Resident Mary McCarten
• TRPD Representative Carlson has met with Resident McCarten many times and the last
correspondence was the end of September 2011 and there is still no resolution to the issues.
• Resident John Breon has written a letter with concerns to TRPD as well.
• The complaint and concerns are that the trail is evolving not as the TRPD presented to the
residents in the beginning as a great way to meet neighbors and socialize.
• Resident McCarten' cleaning lady's vehicle was hit by bicyclist who did not want to go to the
hospital so she gave him a ride home.
• Tickets should be issued even if they are not enforceable to give trail users a reason to pause and
consider their actions.
• Rumble strips are an option to slow down the bicyclists.
• Try something instead of nothing to make the trail more livable and user friendly for the
residents.
• Resident McCarten wants more analysis of the issues then implement solutions.
TRPD Representative Carlson spoke about rumble strips and stated they are not effective because over
time trail users become accustomed to them and ride around them. Areas where there are many driveway
stop signs, some bicyclist move to the roadway to avoid them. TRPD Representative Carlson attended a
conference and there are some best practices discussed but did not address the driveway issues.
Mayor Anderson stated that talking and reiterating issues to Three Rivers Park District Staff has brought
no resolution to any of the trail complaints. TRPD Representative Carlson responded that more •
information on the trail system is being distributed. Mayor inquired as to where the policing is during
the heavy traffic times, because there is no sense in patrolling if not during heavy traffic times on the trail
to see what is happening.
Three Rivers Park Representative Carlson suggested a meeting with Zoning Administrator Krier, City
Administrator Griffin, other experts from Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District to collaborate
on the trail and crossing issues. Council Member Kroll had requested a patrol officer schedule some time
ago and has not received it. She would like the schedule, to determine time of day, minutes per day and
week the TRPD Patrol is on the trail. TRPD Police Officer Hugo stated that the trail is patrolled in
rotating shifts so an exact schedule is difficult to provide. Council Member Kroll wants the situation to
be bettered monitored and asked if other cities are crying out for more patrol as much as Minnetonka
Beach residents. TRPD Representative Carlson stated that reporting to Council during the summer
months is more than TRPD does for other communities. Council Member Ferguson suggests aggressive
speed tables which causes bicyclists to slow down. The City of Naples uses them successfully. TRPD
Representative Carlson stated speed tables cannot be used by driveways. Council Member Ferguson
stated a solution must be found.
Resident Joe Pagano
• Resident Pagano stated that the pedestrians and family bicyclist get along well but its "Tour de
France" bicyclists that zip through at high speeds causing pause for trail enforcement.
• What can we do to slow the high speed bicyclists down because they are not showing courtesy to
the other users.
• Has consideration been given to limiting the access of the high speed bicyclist to certain times of
the day?
• Consider speed limits and enforce them. •
Dakota Trail Town Hall Meeting Minutes Jun_203532
Approved Minutes
• TRPD Representative Carlson has posted on bike sites discouraging bikers from using the Dakota Trail
but it does not work. Another suggestion was to put a bike trail marker on County Road 51 to route
around Minnetonka Beach. Orono Police Chief Farniok stated that County Road 51 is not a good
alternative due to the narrow shoulder width. Mr. Bloom stated mass bikers can stay off the trail.
Currently the communities on the trail are working together to create a uniform event permit application
for trail use. Cities need to join together and deny usage when appropriate then forward those
applications on to the Three Rivers Park District. The bicyclists search websites for 100 mile rides and
the Dakota Trail provides a portion of that trail. Mayor Anderson would like enforceable speed limits.
Resident Tom Schreifer:
• Likes the trail and thinks it is a good thing.
Mayor Anderson thanked all attendees for their input and the discussion. Mayor Anderson closed the
Town Hall Meeting saying that most residents love the trail but there are some serious concerns regarding
the driveway crossing, speed, and safety issues. All attendees of tonight's meeting will receive a copy of
the minutes. Mayor Anderson requested that the TRPD Patrol schedule be sent to Council for review. A
meeting will be scheduled between Council and Three Rivers Park District to hear their solutions to the
trail issues and what will be implemented.
The Town Hall Meeting was closed at 7:30 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted
Diane Tiegs - Roussell, City Clerk
•
Dakota Trail Town Hall Meeting Minutes JurL2036 -12
•
General Fund 1,733,044
Park Dedication Fees 13,075
Area Fire P rotection Services 380,813
Dock
Mound HRA
40,086
G.O. Equip. Certf. 2007 - C
(255)
G.O. Equip. Certf. 2008 - D
13,288
G.O. Equip. Certf. 2009 - C
28,304
Mound Transit Center Series 2006
150,270
G.O. Bonds 2003 - C TIF 1 -2
589,447
G.O. Bonds 2005 - A
352,418
G.O. Bonds 2006 - A
364,034
G.O. Bonds 2007 - A
420,104
G.O. Bonds 2008 - B
314,453
G.O. Bonds 2009 - A
115,664
G.O. Refunding Bonds 2011 - A
120,094
G.O. Bonds 2011 - B
11,252
G.O. Bonds 2012 - A
63,451
G.O. Refunding Bonds 2012 - B
22,529
Taxable G.O. TIF Bonds 2008 A
145,028
HRA Lease Rev Bonds
4,177,408
Capital Improvement
2,732,445
MSA
332,231
Sealcoat
36,545
Downtown TIF 1 -2
63,910
Downtown TIF 1 -3 MHR
86,067
Water
1,980,009
Sewer
419,618
Liquor Store
(136,066)
Recycling
42,419
Storm Water
620,172
•
Note:
The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances
by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger.
The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers,
encumbered funds, or dedicated /reserved resources, etc.
Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be
distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included.
A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before
we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the
independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report
will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties. •
In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds
available for spending.
-2037-
SAFINANCE DEPT \REPORTS\2012 \CASHREPORTCOUNCIL 2012.XLS
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
JUL 2012
GENERALFUND
Taxes
Business Licenses
Non- Business Licenses /Permit
Intergovernmental
Charges for Services
Court Fines
Street Lighting Fee
Franchise Fees
G.O. Equipment Certificates
Charges to Other Dpts
Park Dedication Fees
Other Revenue
GENERAL FUND TOTAL 5,231,500 903,755 2,691,496 (2,540,004) 51.45%
58.33%
JUL 2012 YTD PERCENT
BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED
3,883,001
733,432
1,993,458
(1,889,543)
51.34%
17,800
175
16,910
(890)
95.00%
126,100
8,019
48,577
(77,523)
38.52%
134,060
18,559
33,559
(100,501)
25.03%
79,600
15,332
104,740
25,140
131.58%
55,000
3,608
30,960
(24,040)
56.29%
90,589
6,634
47,683
(42,906)
52.64%
397,000
79,776
200,944
(196,056)
50.62%
122,400
-
-
(122,400)
0.00%
12,000
2,890
6,306
(5,694)
52.55%
-
-
-
-
0.00%
313,950
35,330
208,359
(105,591)
66.37%
FIRE FUND
1,063,688
85,057
684,503
(379,185)
64.35%
DOCK FUND
177,815
579
190,435
12,620
107.10%
MOUND HRA
-
-
24,597
24,597
n/a
WATER FUND
1,480,000
281,912
976,664
(503,336)
65.99%
SEWER FUND
1,494,250
134,773
860,019
(634,231)
57.56%
LIQUOR FUND
2,800,000
302,365
1,577,399
(1,222,601)
56.34%
RECYCLING FUND
225,276
44,376
142,619
(82,657)
63.31%
STORM WATER UTILITY
389,150
36,296
224,130
(165,020)
57.59%
INDIAN KNOLL MANOR
-
21,236
169,452
169,452
n/a
INVESTMENTS (Net of Expensc
-
492
3,258
3,258
n/a
Nik1:11
S: \FINANCE DEPT \REPORTS\2012 \REV- 2012.XLS
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT
July 2012 58.33%
•
July 2012 YTD PERCENT
BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED
GENERAL FUND
1,063,688
87,945
592,170
471,518
55.67%
Council
78,715
4,671
42,290
36,425
53.73%
Promotions
71,000
-
6,892
64,108
9.71%
City Manager /Clerk
315,006
25,705
173,786
141,220
55.17%
Elections
18,160
276
2,424
15,736
13.35%
Finance
310,222
27,273
154,462
155,760
49.79%
Assessing
95,600
94,997
95,030
570
99.40%
Legal
123,500
9,152
63,994
59,506
51.82%
City Hall Building & Srvcs
107,000
5,257
38,624
68,376
36.10%
Computer
43,540
2,117
21,881
21,659
50.25%
Police
1,885,438
144,118
1,055,540
829,898
55.98%
Emergency Prepardeness
8,150
82
1,739
6,411
21.34%
Planning /inspections
308,092
24,055
150,989
157,103
49.01%
Streets
872,772
71,840
419,983
452,789
48.12%
Parks
514,760
60,181
280,049
234,711
54.40%
Park Dedication Fees
-
-
-
-
#DIV /01
Cemetery
11,118
-
954
10,164
8.58%
Transfers
548,170
41,883
293,181
254,989
53.48%
Cable TV
47,492
-
10,426
37,066
21.95%
Contingencies
21,800
4,560
16,537
5,263
75.86% •
GENERAL FUND TOTAL
5,380,535
516,167
2,828,781
2,551,754
52.57%
Area Fire Service Fund
1,063,688
87,945
592,170
471,518
55.67%
Dock Fund
153,862
8,698
69,946
83,916
45.46%
HRA Fund
50,800
17
18,396
32,404
36.21%
Capital Projects
1,500
263,351
754,705
(753,205)
TIF 1 -2 Downtown Mound
-
-
-
-
TIF 1 -3 MHR
-
-
63
(63)
Water Fund
1,643,216
110,960
956,063
687,153
58.18%
Sewer Fund
1,952,387
175,039
1,314,445
637,942
67.33%
Liquor Fund
619,212
45,222
297,681
321,531
48.07%
Recycling Fund
202,895
13,993
102,313
100,582
50.43%
Storm Water Utility
357,168
32,947
237,526
119,642
66.50% •
Indian Knoll Manor
285,700
12_n1R
151,393
134,307
52.99%
-2039-
S: \FINANCE DEPT1REP0RTS\2012 \EXP- 2012.x15
LJ
r�
LAKE
MINNETONKA
ASSOCIATION
13 August 2012
•
•
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound MN 55364
City of Mound,
'Thank you' on behalf of myself and the Lake Minnetonka Association for your recent
contribution of $50.00 toward 2012 Membership. Your contribution is greatly appreciated.
The Lake Minnetonka Association, representing the collective voices of lakeshore owners and
businesses, helps to keep Lake Minnetonka clean and safe. Unless we advocate for our
collective interests, Lake Minnetonka will soon be overrun with Asian carp, hydrilla, spiny
waterflea - and many more obnoxious and damaging exotic species. It is too late for zebra
mussel!
We may also claim successes. The milfoil control demonstration project, now in its fifth year,
has successfully controlled Eurasian watermilfoil throughout the treated bays while also
protecting native plants and water quality. We now must now advocate to make this program
available throughout the lake and with more government funding.
We have focused our efforts on new laws, funding and policies to keep other invasive plants,
animals and viruses out of our lake. We have worked with Minnesota Waters and other partners
and have seen improved laws and increased funding. We have much more work to do as wie
remain too exposed.
The Lake Minnetonka Association is recognized as a credible information resource and an
advocate. We have regular Guest Columns in the Lakeshore Weekly News and 'Lake
Minnetonka Association Presents' program on the local access channel. As a result of our
standing, we are often consulted for information and advice.
Please help us spread the word and broaden our support. Many Lakeshore owners are not yet
members - ask your neighbors to join and support our worthy cause.
Please visit our web site (www.LMAssociation.org) to keep informed about the Lake Minnetonka
Association. Please call Dick Osgood at 952 - 470 -4449 if you have any questions
or concerns. Thank you.
Sincerely,
, )f "
Denise Westman
L fk
Treasurer Lake Minnetonka Association
As required by the IRS, the Lake Minnetonka Association acknowledges that no goods or services were
received in exchange for this gift. Please retain this letter for your tax records.
P.O. Box 24E
Excelsior, MN 55331 1
-2040-
Phone: 952 -470 -4449 1
Email: info @lmassociation.org I
Web: www.Imassociation.org
RICHARD W. STANEK
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF
August 21, 2012
Mayor Mark Hanus
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
City Administrator Kandis Hanson
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Mayor Hanus & City Administrator Hanson:
As one of thirty -six Hennepin County cities that receive dispatch service from the
Sheriff's Office, I am writing to update you on developments of the county board led
Regional Emergency Communications Integration Study Workgroup.
On Wednesday, August 8, Hennepin County administrator Richard Johnson convened the •
second meeting of this workgroup, which consists of the independent PSAPs (public
safety answering points) in our county. (I sent you a letter in January of this year
summarizing the first meeting.) The agenda for this meeting was to review a consultant
study on consolidation and/or integration and discuss next steps. The consensus of the
workgroup was that there was very little interest in consolidation of facilities, but there is
interest in ensuring technology integration.
The Sheriff's Office supports integration of technology across PSAPs as it allows for
greater information sharing and ability to assist as needed. It also standardizes and puts
into practice common protocols and policies.
At the meeting, there was also discussion about the current payment structure that does
not recognize the difference between dependent and independent agencies.
In response, the county commissioners that serve on this workgroup (Commissioner Peter
McLaughlin and Commissioner Jeff Johnson) reported that the policy discussion of
whether to review and reevaluate the current funding structure will begin at a board
briefing tentatively scheduled for September 13, 9:30 a.m. in the county board room.
As an agency that currently receives dispatch service from the county at no charge, I
thought you might be interested in attending this meeting.
I outlined the below in my January letter to you, but I believe it warrants repeating. As .
you may know, the decision whether or not to charge a fee to cities for dispatch service is
-2041-
a policy decision to be made by the county board, with advice from the Sheriff, as
• outlined in MN Statute 383B.255, which I have included for your reference below:
MN Statute 38313.255
Subd. 2. Policy and operations. The public safety communications system shall be under
the direction of the sheriff. Public safety communications policies may be established by
the board of county commissioners.
Subd. 3. Extension of services; charges. Public safety communications services may be
extended to any statutory or home rule charter city within the county, and to any
adjoining county or statutory or home rule charter city in an adjoining county, upon the
written request of its governing body to the Hennepin County board. All the
communications equipment used in connection with the extended service shall, unless
otherwise provided by the Hennepin County board, be owned, maintained, and serviced
by Hennepin County. The board with the advice of the sheriff may establish a charge for
extended public safety communications services pursuant to section 383B.118.
In discussions with the county board, I have made it clear that I do not support a fee for
dispatch service; however, the decision on whether to charge cities for dispatch service
moving forward will be made by the county board. I encourage your attendance at this
September 13 board briefing.
If you have any questions about the above information or would like to confirm the
meeting time on September 13, please feel free to contact Sandra Westerman on my staff,
• Director of Intergovernmental Relations, at 612.543.0694, or call me directly anytime.
Sincerely,
.w
Richard W. Stanek
Hennepin County Sheriff
Cc:
Police Chief
Fire Chief
C7
-2042-
r�
��
�_J