No preview available
2014-04-15 CC Agenda Packetmmunity. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA Page 1. Call meeting to order 2. Supervisors' Annual Reports to the City Council A. Liquor Store — Manager John Colotti 1 -17 B. Fire & Rescue /Emergency Response— Fire Chief Greg Pederson 18 -90 C. Orono Police Department— Police Chief Coney Farniok 91 -105 D. Finance & Administration/Docks Administration — Finance 106 -109 Director /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche E. Community Development /Planning /Zoning /Building Inspections — 110 -112 Community Development Director Sarah Smith F. Public Works Divisions 113 -124 1. Public Works a. Public Works Director Carlton Moore - Projects b. Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson - Operations 2. Parks and Open Spaces a. Public Works Director Carlton Moore 3. Adjourn m FINANCIAL STATEMENT MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE, CITY OF MOUND, MN. The City of Mound hereby submits a statement of the financial affairs of the Municipal Liquor Store for the year ended Dec. 31, 2013, showing a balance sheet and a statement of operations as prescribed by the Office of the State Auditor in accordance with Minnesota Statute 471.6985. Respectfully submitted, Catherine Pausche Finance Director/Clerk/Treasurer CITY OF MOUND - MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED) December 31, 2013 ASSETS Cash and temporary investments $ 2,000 Inventory, at cost 332,956 Prepaid items 250 Capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation 1,010,845 TOTAL ASSETS 1,346,051 LIABILITIES Accounts and salaries payable 89,197 Amounts due to other City funds 552,748 TOTAL LIABILITIES 641,945 NET POSITION (LIABILITIES) Net investment in capital assets 1,010,845 Unrestricted (306,739) TOTAL NET POSITION (LIABILITIES) $ 704,106 -2- SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF MOUND MUNICIPAL LIQUOR OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 OPERATING REVENUES Sales $ 2,887,226 Cost of goods sold 2,148,246 Gross Profit 738,980 Gross Profit as a Percent of Sales 25.59% Operating Expenses 535,791 Operating Income 203,189 Nonoperating Revenues 89 INCOME BEFORE TRANSFERS 203,278 Transfers out 63,515 CHANGE IN NET POSITION 139,763 NET POSITION, JANUARY 1 564,343 NET POSITION, DECEMBER 31 $ 704,106 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Transfers from Liquor Store Profits to City Funds: General Fund -3- $ 63,515 Harbor Wine & Spirits Annual Report March 2014 Report Prepared by: John Colotti, Manager Overview Harbor Wine & Spirits is a successful wine shop located on the shores of Lake Minnetonka. There is intense competition in this market with two competitors that we would consider local equivalents in addition to the two major regional competitors located in Minneapolis. Our success is based on several factors including product selection, pricing, knowledgeable sales staff, store design, in -store displays, tastings, in -store promotions, community event leadership and media marketing. Spring - Customer Appreciation Wine Sale Annual Sale in February Held for the past ten years, the Customer Appreciation Wine Sale has helped drive sales at a time of year that is post - holiday and pre- summer peak sales times. The sale is primarily promoted through the Laker /Pioneer and Lakeshore Weekly News as well as on bag stuffers that go out the weeks leading up to the sale. Setting Harbor Wine & Spirits Customer Appreciation Wine Sale apart from our metro competitors is our universal 15% off by the bottle and 20% off by the case (including mix & match cases) wine pricing. Most retailers present a limited listing of wines for their sale; subsequently new customers are routinely impressed when they discover all their choice wines are on sale at our store. During the three week long sale we have in -store wine samplings hosted by our wholesaler's wine representatives. We conduct the tastings on Thursday, Friday and Saturdays during peak customer traffic time. Fall Wine Sale Annual Sale in September /October This is the largest wine sale of the year, featuring 15% off by the bottle and 20% off by the case (including mix & match cases) wine. Our customers tell us they mark their calendars for this sale and we make it easy for them to remember it by advertising in the local newspaper, social media and bag stuffers. Repeal of Prohibition Sale December 5, 2013 Last year the industry was all a buzz over the 79th anniversary of the repeal of prohibition and we jumped onboard with a retro sales event that was a huge hit with our customers. Our Anheuser -Busch distributor, Thorpe Distributing, worked with us once again to sell single bottles of Budweiser for 10 cents per bottle to commemorate the price back in 19331 U This was also a great time for our customers to try something new as we had beer and spirits vendors offering samples from Noon to 8 p.m. For those who made a purchase that day we had vendor giveaways such as bottle openers, t- shirts and baseball caps. While the wine sales are a great time to buy wine, this was an opportunity for our customers to get 20% off beer & spirits as well as wine. Given the December date of this event we questioned if it would cut into our holiday revenues, however, it proved to be very profitable with Net Sales for the day being $19547.32 vs. the 2012 event's Net Sales of $19024.08. That combined with the fact that our overall December sales for 2013 were up by $21831.93 over 2012. We are looking forward to the 2014 sale which will mark the 81st anniversary. In fact we already have commitments from the majority of our vendors to participate in the 2014 event. We promoted this sale with heavy print advertising in the Laker /Pioneer and Lakeshore Weekly News, social media and bag stuffers. Wine & Beer of the Month Each month we feature a wine & a beer of the month promotion. We negotiate special pricing through our wine & beer vendors (which allows us to still make a profit even during the spring and fall wine sale months when customers get a further 15 -20% discount). Vendors produce both point -of -sale promotional material and a large window sign to heighten customer awareness. They host no less than two in -store tastings on weekends during their monthly feature. We have found that this promotion results in profitable "add on" sales. Senior Citizen Discount Working in coordination with Jubilee Foods, we offer a 10% senior citizen discount every Tuesday and Friday which is coincidental with their grocery store's senior discount program. This program creates a "one- stop- shop" effect. Harbor Wine & Spirits - Beer Label Surfside Pale Ale creation with Lucid Brewing of Minnetonka Keeping with the craft -brew trend that is sweeping the market, in 2013 we were able once again to have our own beer label created through local brewery Lucid. Part -time Harbor Wine & Spirits employee Dean Fleming gave the beer a fitting name, "Surfside Pale Ale ". Mayor Mark Hanus presided over the ceremonial unveiling of the new beer with a festive ribbon cutting event that included an in -store beer tasting. This year's version was a German — style lager, that was available in both kegs and six pack bottles. Our Mound Marketplace neighbor Carbone's Pizzeria, got into the spirit and cross - promoted our beer by offering it on tap. This summer we once again featured Surfside Lager at the Spirit of the Lakes Festival. Harbor Wine & Spirits is the sole retailer of the bottled product, and arrangements are being made to have a "new" -5- Surfside Pale Ale created for us each year in time for the Spirit of the Lakes Festival. We are currently sold out of the 2013 label. Spirit of the Lake Festival — Beer Garden The Spirit of the Lakes Festival takes place in July each year and Harbor Wine & Spirits hosts the beer garden which is open Friday /Saturday /Sunday of the event. We work with the Festival Planning Committee throughout the year to plan for this major community event. Harbor Wine & Spirits Assistant Manager Ron Gust manages the beer garden, which is staffed by store employees, members of the Jaycees, ReMax Realty, and the Masons. This is an opportunity for us to reinforce name recognition and to support our community. For the past several years we have worked with Thorpe Distributing, who is our Anheuser -Busch supplier, to coordinate this event. They have a division devoted to this type of promotional activity and the largest promotional budget of any of our suppliers. Through them we are able to secure a refrigerated beer trailer, promotional items such as street banners, wristbands and point -of- sale /general signage all at no cost to the City. The beer offered at the beer garden is cross - promoted at the store. Spirit of the Lake Festival — Wine/Beer/Spirits Tastings Wine and food pairings are presented as a special event hosted by Harbor Wine & Spirits at the Spirit of the Lake Festival. There are several classes offered featuring high end wine, beer and spirits. Event goers pay $30 per person to participate and receive gifts such as wine glasses, t- shirts and other promotional items. Attendees can place orders for the featured items at the event through Harbor Wine & Spirits at discounted prices for in -store pick -up. Westonka Community and Commerce Organization - Membership Harbor Wine & Spirits is in a unique position, representing both the City of Mound and itself as local business, as a member of the Westonka Community and Commerce Organization (CCO). Through our membership in the CCO we are able to network with other business and community leaders and promote our store and the City of Mound as a premier place to do business. Newspaper Advertising Laker/Pioneer News Lakeshore Weekly News As the official newspaper for the City of Mound, the Laker /Pioneer News is the primary newspaper for our sales promotions and other advertising efforts. We supplement this advertising with ads in the Lakeshore Weekly News in order to reach the entire lake community. Lake Minnetonka Area Business Flyer A The Lake Minnetonka Area Business Flyer is produced monthly and is a newsprint advertising that we have found to be very effective. We have used this flyer for the past eight years. We have advertised our upcoming sales, tasting events and promotions. To determine who has been noticing our ads we have run periodic 10% wine discount coupons and each time, we've received 50+ coupons back. BoomBoard In -Store Video Advertisements To increase add on sales, in November 2012 we partnered with LifeMedia to bring in -store advertising to Harbor Wine & Spirits. This has been the case in 2013 as well. LifeMedia provides a flat screen television screen and generates the ads that run on the screen. Harbor Wine & Spirits promotions are the primary ads with other area business ads cycling through. (LifeMedia makes its money on the other ads it sells — there is no cost to the store.) The customer comments have been positive, with them appreciating the notice on current promotions, leading to additional sales of featured items. Social Media - Twitter Mid -2012 the store launched its Twitter account. We started off with a limited following, and have been building our base by adverting the account on our cash register receipts. We now have over 100 followersH To create value to being one of our followers we have posted exclusive messages such as a the arrival of tightly allocated craft brews in addition to our broader advertised wine tastings and in- store specials. WineConnect - Website For the last seven years we've partnered with WineConnect, a wine & spirits specialty website company to manage our store website. WineConnect has a massive database which contains brand photos and in- depth descriptions of the beer, wine and spirits we sell. WineConnect has a direct link into our inventory database so it can update the site with any new items we bring in and remove any we discontinue. We do not ship our product so the website is targeted to our local market. Each year we have a handful of customers place phone orders for in -store pick -up based on the website, but more importantly we have received excellent customer feedback on the ability to research complex wine choices and review their availability before making an in store purchase. -7- Previous Year Class Chart Harbor Wine & Spirits Sorts: Class 4/7/2014 11:58:48 AM Page 1 Costs Sales $- 150000 $0 $150000 $300000 $450000 3600000 $750000 $900000 OPEN - LIQUOR -01, 001- OPEN -BEER - 02, 002 - OPEN -BEER OPEN- WINE -03, 003 - OPEN -WINE OPEN- NON/TAX - 04, OPEN 6.5 % TAX -05, 005 - OPEN -6.5% BOTTLE /KEG DEPOSIT - 06, BOTTLE /KEG REFUND - 07, PROMOTIONAL EVENT - 08, BAR SUPPLY FOOD NTAX - 13, BAR SUPPLY 6.5% TAX - 10, 010 -BAR Continued... Previous Year Class Chart Harbor Wine & Spirits Page 2 Costs Msalesl $- 150000 $0 $150000 $300000 $950000 $600000 $750000 $900000 CIGARETTES AND CIGAR - 12, CIGARETTES AND CIGAR - 12, CIGARETTES AND CIGAR - 12, CIGARETTES AND CIGAR - 12, JUICES NON/TAX- 15, 015- JUICES POP & MIXES 6.5% - 16, 016 -MIXES POP & MIXES 6.5% -16, 017 -POP N/A BEER NO TAX - 16, 018 -N /A BEER WINE -60, 019 -N /A WINE BEER - 20, 020 -BEER Continued... 91 Previous Year Class Chart Harbor Wine & Spirits Page 3 Costs IlSalesl $- 150000 $0 $150000 $303000 $550000 $600000 $750000 $900000 BEER -20, 021- IMPBEER LIQUOR - 30, 030 -VODKA LIQUOR -30, 031 -GIN LIQUOR - 30, 032 -RUM LIQUOR -30, 033 - TEQUILA LIQUOR -30, 034 - STRAIGHTS LIQUOR -30, 035 - BLENDS LIQUOR -30, 036 - CANADIANS LIQUOR -30, 037 - BRANDY /COGNAC LIQUOR - 30, 038 -IRISH Continued... -10- Previous Year Class Chart Harbor Wine & Spirits Page 4 Costs MISalesl $- 150000 $0 $150000 $300000 $450000 $6J0000 $750000 $900000 LIQUOR -30, 039 - SCOTCH LIQUOR -30, 040 - CORDIALS LIQUOR-30, 041- SCHNAPPS LIQUOR -30, 042- COCKTAILS LIQUOR - 30, 043 - FLAVORED BRANDY LIQUOR - 30, 044 -CREAM LIQUEURS LIQUOR -30, 045- DECANTERS WINE - 60, 060 - DOMESTIC MISC WINE -60, 061 - DOMESTIC CHARDS WINE -60, 062 - DOMESTIC Continued... -11- Previous Year Class Chart Harbor Wine & Spirits Page 5 Costs Sales $- 150000 $0 $150000 $300000 5450000 $600000 $'150000 $900000 WINE -60, 063- DOMESTICMERLOTS WINE - 60, 064 - DOMESTIC MISC REDS WINE - 60, 065- DOMESTIC MISC WINE - 60, 066 - IMPORTS MISC WINE -60, 067 - AUSTRALIAN WINE WINE -60, 068 - FRENCH WINES WINE -60, 069 - GERMAN WINES WINE -60, 070- CHILIAN WINES WINE -60, 071 - ITALIAN WINES WINE -60, 072- CHAMPAGNES Continued... -12- Previous Year Class Chart Harbor Wine & Spirits Page 6 Costs ESales $- 150000 $0 $150000 $ 300000 $450000 $600000 $750000 $900000 WINE -60, 073 - VERMOUTHS WINE - 60, 074- SHERRY /PORTS WINE -60, 075 - DESSERT WINES WINE -60, 076 SPANISH WINE BEER -20, 080 -MALT BAR SUPPLY FOOD NTAX - 13, BAR BEER - 20, BEER - DISCONTINUED LIQUOR - 30, LIQUOR - DISCONTINUED POP & MIXES 6.5 %- 16, PROMOTIONAL EVENT - 08, Continued... -13- Previous Year Class Chart Harbor Wine & Spirits Page 7 Costs IMSalesl $- 150000 $0 $150000 $300000 $450000 $600000 $750000 $900000 CIGARETTES AND CIGAR - 12, OPEN - LIQUOR - 01, UNDEFINED - 202 WINE -60, WINE - DISCONTINUED m EIM El O m m 0 0 0 0 0 _z r r � O m m m m m m O M O 'O9 m m m m m D ° (� ; s m m ,x ,x M m z z z z z m m O m x m N m 7J m N m m N v v m ° m m O D D m T < e < V z A DpO D° z m m m z m m O (n m 0 O n v O Z m -i Z m Z D m m D N W w w w A w 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 (n O O In W j 0 V O W (n O cp O O V O N V J A O N V V N N N W A (WJ� m OJ N W N V W W V A W O) A O W O N m A N N V V N N N In 0 0 [9 O m to O cp O V O (T O A V O -15- to O i i i f I v� n o < y 0 i y f 7 1 ^' J � 0 7 � n 3 IN A V N O A N O p) A O O N � Previous Year Department Chart Harbor Wine & Spirits Sorts: Dept 4/7/2014 12:12:00 PM Filters: Description is between BAR SUPPLY 6.5% TAX - 10 and WINE - 60 Page 1 111cost ®Sales $- 200000 $0 $200000 $400000 $600000 9600000 $1000000 $1200000 BAR SUPPLY 6.5% TAX - 10 BAR SUPPLY FOOD NTAX - 13 BEER - 20 i�T7 BOTTLE /KEG DEPOSIT - 06 BOTTLE /KEG REFUND -07 CIGARETTES AND CIGAR - 12 JUICES NON/TAX - 15 LIQUOR - 30 LOTTERY -PAID OUT - 09 Continued... -16- Previous Year Department Chart Harbor Wine & Spirits Page 2 Costs Sales $- 200000 $0 $200000 $4000U0 $600000 $600000 $1000000 $1200000 N/A BEER NO TAX - 18 OPEN 6.5% TAX - 05 OPEN -BEER - 02 OPEN- LIQUOR - 01 OPEN- NOWTAX - 04 OPEN -WINE - 03 POP & MIXES 6.5% - 16 PROMOTIONAL EVENT - 08 WINE -60 -17- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Main: 952.472.3555 Fax: 952.472.3775 www,moundfire.com Vision Statement: It's our vision to be known as an innovative and progressive fire department. We are dedicated to the delivery of effective fire suppression, rescue services and quality fire safety education to the public. We strive to offer the best available education and training to our members. We are committed to providing an environment which fosters teamwork among members. We desire to have an atmosphere of open communication which promotes the health and welfare of individual members. This Annual Report is prepared for the Mayor and Councilors for the City of Mound, and also the Mayors and Councilors of the four other cities we serve. This report is also presented to and reviewed with our Mound Fire Commission members. M Section I Section II Section III Overview & Highlights Pages 1 -4 Organization and Staff Information Pages 5 -I1 Department Activities And Performance Measurement Section IV Apparatus & Equipment Section V Facilities Section VI Finances & Budget Section VII Strategic Plan Initiatives & Accomplishments Section VIII Fire Department Challenges And General Information -19- Pages 12 -22 Pages 23 -26 Pages 28 -37 Pages 38 -54 Pages 55 -71 Mound Fire Department 2013 Annual Report Overview and Highlights This overview provides a general, but important summary of the Mound Fire Department activities, accomplishments, and goals met for the year 2013. The detail and support documents provided within this 2013 Annual Report provide details and comprehensive information about the Mound Fire Department and the fire department operations. Please contact Fire Chief Greg Pederson if you have any questions or comments about the information, or would like to discuss any of the issues. General Note: This 2013 Annual Report is dutifully prepared for the Mayor and Councilors for the City of Mound, but also the Mayors and Councilors of the four other contracting cities we serve. This report is also presented to and reviewed with our Mound Fire Commission members. Introduction and Overview The year 2013 was another very successful year for the Mound Fire Department. This year we continued to work our strategic plan which focuses on hiring, training, and maintaining our firefighter staff, conservative budgeting, and vigilant financial management. Year 2013 was a year of major accomplishments for the fire department (refer to accomplishments section). Our well trained and active paid -on -call firefighter staff remains our most vital asset. In 2013, our firefighter staffing level increased from 38 to 40, with the hiring of 6 firefighters, three people retiring and I other resigning. My staffing plan for 2013 is to increase the number of firefighters and as of March 6, 2013, we have 40 firefighters on staff. It is the dedication and commitment of the Mound firefighters that help uphold the service and quality of the Mound Fire Department. In 2013 our calls for service for Fire and Rescue call activity increased slightly from the 2012 levels. Our fire department emergency call outs in 2013 were 558 vs. 554 call outs in year 2012. Our firefighter emergency response hours for the year were about 4% higher than the 2012 levels with a total firefighter emergency response hours at 11,129 hours. The commitment of time and effort by firefighters continues to be substantial as shown in the detailed breakdown pages which show department activity. Organization, Staff Information, Performance Measurement The Mound Fire department consists of a very active volunteer paid -on -call firefighter staff. We currently have a staff of 39 volunteer firefighters, plus one full -time administrative assistant and a full -time fire chief. The total fire department staff is currently at 41. The following points about organizational resources are supported by the documentation and graphs included in the pages that follow (please refer to the charts, lists, and graphs). -20- jAadmin\admin & organization \annual repon\2013 annual report infonnation\2013 annual report highlights and summary - finatdoex • In January, 2013 three veteran firefighters retired, and two of the three retired firefighters returned to active service in April 2013. • In March, 2013 six (6) new firefighters were hired on a one year probationary period. • In September 2013 two firefighters retired, and in October 2013 one firefighter resigned for health reasons. • Fire and Rescue calls for service were quite steady and at a typical level in 2013. The department continues to be very active with a total of 11,129 personnel hours spent at fires and other emergency calls (refer to the 2013 activity report included). • We responded to 25 Mutual Aid requests in 2013 vs. 16 in 2012, and we provided 975 mutual aid personnel hours. The requests for mutual aid will continue to increase in the future due to lack of resources at area fire departments, especially during daytime hours. • Our fire department response continues to generate an average of about 19 -20 firefighters per emergency call, which is a high number of responders as compared to many other volunteer or paid -on -call type fire departments. • MFD firefighters worked a significant amount of hours on apparatus, equipment, and station maintenance in 2013 for a total of 1,028 hours. • In 2013 our staff training hours was high at 2,906 hours. Our fire department staff is well trained and more diversified than ever. Quality training for staff is a top priority in our department and is critical to our long term success. • Our fire department staff including all fire officers and firefighters is skilled as well with a total of about 400 years of accumulated firefighting experience. Our firefighters, through hard work and dedication continue to put in many volunteer hours, with a conservative estimate of all work by firefighters in 2013 at 17,617 hours. Apparatus and Equipment In 2013 we continued to work on and implement our Apparatus Replacement and Efficiently Plan. Capital Expenditure spending on apparatus and equipment was low in 2013 due to budget and financial limitations. There was one addition to our apparatus fleet in 2013. In 2013 we purchased a new 2013 Chevy Tahoe SUV to support our Duty Chief and Duty Officer Program. The total investment in vehicle and all equipment was $ 40,496. Our 1980 Sutphen 100' Aerial Ladder truck is now over 33 years old, it has become outdated, requires constant care and maintenance, and needs to be replaced (or possibly taken out of service) very soon. The ladder truck has had many ongoing operational and functional failures or problems. The operational failures have often been a safety concern that has required frequent repair. NOTE: The cost of replacement for a 100' Aerial Ladder truck depends upon the path we choose (i.e. buy new truck, buy used truck, or refurbish existing truck). The cost of a new aerial ladder truck that is similar in size and performance to ours would be approximately $875,000 - $925,000. In any case we need a ladder truck for fire response and suppression, high level rescue, in support if our fire protection contracts, and our ISO Public Protection Classification in all cities. -21- jAadmin\admYn & organization annual repon\2013 annual report information \2013 annual report highlights and summary - final.dou P; In 2010, the Fire Commission has asked me to make the ladder truck replacement a priority topic and a standard meeting agenda item. There have been numerous conversations about the ladder truck replacement throughout 2013, and the ladder truck is listed in the Capital Plan Equipment Plan for replacement in 2014, or in the future as soon finances allow. We continue to analyze and consider new concepts to meet our ever changing needs for fire apparatus and equipment. We believe our fire apparatus replacement program plan considers all of the practical and available options for prudent and cost effective apparatus replacement purchases in the future. The Fire Commission meeting discussions often deal with apparatus needs, replacement plan, financial feasibility, and future purchases. Facility — Fire Station The Mound Public Safety Facility remains ideal for our daily administration, staff activities, apparatus housing, equipment storage, training, and emergency response operations. There are several facility repair and maintenance items that will need to be addressed in the near fixture. The repair items that need attention are listed on the Public Safety Facility CIP attached. Finances and Budget The Mound Fire Department operating expenses for 2013 were under budget overall. This is a challenging task considering the fire department budget increased by only 1.76 % in 2013. Please refer to the budget summary page in this report for the 2013 Budget vs. Expenditures comparison and financial details. • The fire account reserve fund balance at the beginning of 2013 was $312,082 with an estimated ending reserve balance of $330.082 at the end of 2013. • The fire fund balance only increased by approximately $4,960 in 2013 to a year -end balance of $317,546 (not the final audited amount). • The end of year fire fund balance is lower than estimated as a result of the Capital Purchase of a 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe SUV 4 x 4 Duty of Officer Vehicle. Total investment expense of $40,496. • Donations and Grants have become a critical $$ supplement to our budget every year. In 2013, these donations and grants programs added over $12,000 to our revenue. Challenges for the Future — Remain the Same We are well aware of the nationwide trends and the struggles that many paid -on -call fire departments face today and the challenges that are anticipated in the very near future. While the challenges are many, the primary ones are: recruiting and retaining volunteer firefighters, maintaining the financial support and budget needed to fund apparatus and equipment purchases, creatively managing fire and emergency call volumes in consideration of firefighter or staff time commitment, and sharing services (mutual aid or other) among communities to insure efficient high quality service. The West Metro Lake Minnetonka area Fire Chiefs have met and started discussions about the possibly of forming a West Lake area Fire District. The discussions have focused on solving staffing concerns, sharing resources such as staff and equipment, and financial planning. -22- j Witen\admin & organizetionWantal report12013 annual report information \2013 annual report highlights and summary - final.doex P. Strategic Plan, Initiatives, and Accomplishments Ten years ago in 2004, I began a Strategic Plan Initiative with a focus on four key areas including: Personnel and /or Staffing, Budget and Financial Management, Apparatus and Equipment, and Facilities. Implementation of this strategic plan is essential to the success of the Mound Fire Department in the future. Many of the important strategic plan initiatives have been completed or are ongoing A summary of the department accomplishments for the year 2013 is included in this report. The year 2013 brought some important Administrative and Organization changes to the Mound Fire Department. The department organization structure, including fire department officer responsibilities, job tasks, and supporting staff duties changed for the better. A Duty Chief and Duty Officer Program study was completed, which will further improve our fire department operations and efficiency. The Duty Officer Program begins in April 2014. Summary The year 2013 was another busy and very successful year for the Mound Fire Department. I feel our department accomplishments in 2013 were notable. As a fire department, our staff believes we have continued our mission to serve our residents and customers well by providing an essential public service at a relatively low cost with a very high value. There has been minimal, or in many cases no budget or cost increases from 2011 to 2013. Our staff of firefighters and office personnel, apparatus, and equipment continues to be maintained as our key strong elements. We have very nice functional fire station facility. I believe our 2014 (and future) priority and focus needs to be on increasing funding of our Apparatus Replacement and Efficiency Project and plan. The budget constraints over the past 5 years have taken a toll on our apparatus replacement program. It is time to prioritize and allocate more $$ to support apparatus replacement for the present and in the future. As we look to the future, we anticipate improving and expanding our department operations further by partnering with Minnetrista as part of their expanded fire service protection plan. A larger fire district partnership concept will lead to more efficient use of our fire staff, apparatus, and equipment. A fire partnership model or fire district will most likely be a financial benefit to the residents of Mound, Minnetrista, St. Bonifacius, and other West Lake communities, plus provide an added benefit to all of the fire protection contract cities as well. On behalf of our fire department staff and myself, I would like to thank our city officials, fire commission members, and citizens for their continued cooperation and support of the Mound Fire Department. Respectfully submitted, Gregory S. Pederson Mound Fire Chief 2 April 2014 -23- j1adminWnnin & organization \annual repon\2013 annual report infonnation\2013 annal report highlights and summary - final.docx P. 1' 1 • / / 1 / / I V Nrn V/ L; 1 N C to CL C. C .0 E v9 ca d L C O d W � � v CEO 1 1 iA C O r L d CL A J M C 1= mom. tv co J 0 -24- E C 0 lm (D C9 C CD E tot E. CL > 0 m C.tm= m E ++ NCiiN Q ,'rod I.1.. W_y W Y d E 0LE�,� N C C�� =�0 �,. ®++ E r-00 CQ%. O 0 C O O w W N Q ffM^ q4) W Q v/CL ss0qq V 0 04)0C4� � cn L) d L_ :; °® �yLgj Ve u-W �y3 a. a. e e ® e e -24- P: E 0 lm (D C9 C CD E tot E. CL > 0 C.tm= m Q ,'rod I.1.. W_y W Y d E V od (� C N C C�� =�0 �,. ®++ E L E a Q ffM^ q4) W Q v/CL ss0qq V 0 ® e P: • • 4.0 c 0 E ca c ca ci( ® a) L E ^^W W LL 4- co L 5 W L ^4^�` W .c U W U. i L '(A Q L E -25- m F- E o� di Q c Co 0 0 P G c Pt c C C Y� p >a N C > 2) Pt c O c15 G M 9a L m 4�) C L1 U v� N O �U i O N ' EUo E m Co a00 �a U r^ vOJ m ry ;E aV W 2O 2`O FL U w. U f` mc cu W- AO E m U cLo a. y cm 29 �Q¢ -26- 0 � U N N 0 0 lroD .� O O N CC `S C C T 0 CD fII Q Z C J U O,(DY URsU Ncc ]+ >',N 7 0 0 rL O J 'U LL Ur =.0 0:ro Z U Y d cu C 0 M O O.O LO Q.. tY o r p co Od m N.M.G C O U- d N C m, O N N 0 C N V' O N C �rN �� UQ W:ro:.a W�U-��. U,J m .- m { ' a; 72 O 0. 'p O` U > N UFU- 1 O cam 2y U- r � ar U W U J Im P' Chief 1 Asst. Chief Asst. Chief Captain 11 Captain 12 Lieut. 16 Asst. Chief Dep. Fire Marshal Captain 14 Captain 15 Captain 16 Lieut. 12 Lieut. 11 Lieut. 14 Lieut. 15 Updated 2 -11 -2014 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT Years of Service List 1 GREG 2 RICK 3 GREG 4 TIM 5 EDDIE 6 DENNIS 7 BOB 8 JASON 9 JOHN 10 RICH 11 ROGER 12 BRUCE 13 MATT 14 TONY 15 DARREN 16 KEVIN 17 BRIAN 18 STEVEN 19 MIKE 20 JOSH 21 MIKE 22 PAUL 23 MARK 24 DERAK 25 JASON 26 ANDY 27 BEN 28 BEN 29 BRYAN 30 MATT 31 AARON 32 JEFF 33 SHAWN 34 JEFFREY 35 NICK 36 DANNY 37 CHRIS 38 JED 39 AARON 4o DANIEL NAME PEDERSON WILLIAMS PALM PALM VANECEK WOYTCKE CRAWFORD MAAS LARSON ROGERS KRYCK GUSTAFSON JAKUBIK MYERS POIKONEN FLAIG BERENT HENKELS MCCARVILLE CLEMONS FOLEY JOLICOEUR LEE ANDING RICE DRILLING FOSTER GOTTSCHALK GORMAN MORRIS CRANDALL HARRISON HAYES BRYCE FARLEY GRADY HEITZ KOBERNUSZ MORRISON PATTERSON START DATE EQUIP. # 2/3/1975 18 Over 20 years 418/2013 22 (Return to Svc) 4/1/2013 15 (Return to Svc) 5/1/1989 17 11/4/1991 34 3/2/1992 24 3/21/1994 6 15 - 20 years 5/2/1994 32 3/6/1995 5 10/16/1995 19 12/4/1995 27 2/511996 11 11/17/1997 37 5/4/1998 33 12/19/1998 30 4/19/1999 7 10 - 15 years 4/24/2000 1 9/10/2001 2 1/6/2003 35 5/10/2004 23 5- 10 years 5/10/2004 16 5/10/2004 39 5/10/2004 40 7/26/2004 3 7/26/2004 42 5/20/2006 25 5/20/2006 29 5/20/2006 26 11/5/2007 21 11/5/2007 44 10/5/2009 8 Under 5 years 10/5/2009 10 10/5/2009 38 3/21/2011 46 3/4/2013 52 Probationary 3/4/2013 47 3/4/2013 48 3/4/2013 49 3/4/2013 50 3/4/2013 51 *Years of service is as of. -27- Yrs Svc * 38.91 29.91 29.67 24.67 22.16 21.83 19.78 19.67 18.83 18.21 18.08 17.90 16.12 15.66 15.04 14.70 13.69 12.31 10.99 9.64 9.64 9.64 9.64 9.43 9.43 7.62 7.62 7.62 6.16 6.16 4.24 4.24 4.24 2.78 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 1/1/2014 J: \adminAdmin & OrganizationlActive Information \Seniority List - Current P1 0 0 N T f0 E m c i a z Y O O 0 C N C O U i v N c L C Z 0 a E H 1 m N O N P9 • Stt ���� t :. lt�ttt `+s,6`t�t t It1 ��Vt �t iLdt""I'V PWMIIII ,t�G�iftlUktti y t`i�tt It �� 1 v;.i it ttii t }List i t t,;l . hti t tt all IN 1 ,tit ttLea" > t tt Lt pt � 1 �iA i t � 1 i l \ ��tix i�� 11 ���1541KU4t �tA tt`k tl t • Y W ��t�tit k ` � 55\\ �i�r?aYt ��L� tt�� U t� t1�R�"ii�t *ta., ,�`�'x L, iv'ii t tit i', u�* i ilk � li,.�L • t('i LOtt1 di �,, {j {m 1 "tvTtitttNt t;ku {� t a�tatl�i t"ttti�h tt ttitt ttt��i t to t �}` �1 t. t�tit£Llk >�4. ���t reL 0 0 N T f0 E m c i a z Y O O 0 C N C O U i v N c L C Z 0 a E H 1 m N O N P9 Mound Fire Department 2014 Firefighter Staffing Summary Name Activity/Description Staffing Level All Staff 2007 total of all department staff 45 (Includes chief and administrative) All firefighters 2007 total MFD volunteer staff 44 Jerry Rieke resigns after 4 years on March 4, 2008 43 Kevin Grady retired after 20 years on August 11, 2008 42 Paul Henry retired after 20 years on May 5, 2009 41 Matt Kvam (1.5 years) purchased a home 5/22 out of service area 40 6.4 miles away and resigned 6/09 Rod Stevens (8.5 years) purchased a home 7/31 out of area in 39 Norwood Young America and resigned 8/09. HHired four new probationary firefighters 10/05/09 43 Kevin Sipprell (20 years) Jim Casey (19 years) Dan Grady (20 years) retired after 20 years served on 04/06/10 42 resigned 05/13/10 with health issues related to 41 workers compensation injuries (non -fire dept.) retired on December 6, 2010 M Hired three new probationary firefighters 3/21/2011 43 Tony Boldon (4 years) Resigned 9/6/11 (performance reasons) 42 Matt Svihel Resigned 10/1/11 moved out of area 41 Gerald Berthiaume Resigned 6/28/12 (Didn't meet probationary 40 Requirements) Dan Heiland Resigned 10/09/12 (Didn't meet probationary 39 Requirements) Matt Hentges Retired after 16 years of service on 12/01/12 38 Jeff Andersen Retired after 32 years of service on 1/7/2013 37 -29- jAadminWmin & organizationVmman resourceAmfd staffing summary january 2014.doc I 1`11 Greg Palm Retired after 28 years of service on 1/8/2013 36 Rick Williams Retired after 29 years of service on 1/9/2013 35 Hired six new probationary firefighters 3/4/2013 41 Greg Palm Rick Williams Chris Pounder Paul Babb Jeremy Spader Other considerations Tim Palm (24+ years) Eddie Vanecek (21+ years) Dennis Woytcke (21 +years) Return to Service on 4/1/2013 42 Return to Service on 4/8/2013 43 Retired 9/13/2013 42 Retried 9/14/2013 41 Resigned 10/7/2013 0 Considerations, Options and Action Plan Items a MFD's consistently high firefighter staffing levels is very important to our fire service customers and contracts. ® It is much more difficult for firefighters today to maintain the high level of response percentages, and as expected of firefighters in the past. In this regard, more staff is better to achieve the same result. a Each firefighter costs the department budget approximately $5 -6K per year (low) a Basic training of new recruits and the evaluation of firefighter's capabilities take about 15 -18 months. Training requires much more time classroom and certification. -30- j:ladmin \admin & organization \human resources\mrd staffing summary january 2014.doc 2 Pi 2013 Activity Report EMERGENCY CALLS FIRE /RESCUE CALLS 2013 IN OUR PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 533 MUTUAL AID CALLS 2013 OUT OF OUR SERVICE AREA 25 TOTAL OF ALL FIRE /RESCUE CALLS IN 2013 558 INCLUDING MUTUAL AID • TEP FIRE /RESCUE PERSONNEL HOURS 2013 IN OUR PRIMARY 10,154 SERVICE AREA MUTUAL AID FIRE /RESCUE PERSONNEL HOURS 2013 975 FIRE /RESCUE PERSONNEL HOURS 2013 11,129 INCLUDING MUTUAL AID • r• FIRE /RESCUE PERSONNEL HOURS IN 2013 11,129 INCLUDING MUTUAL AID MAINTENANCE HOURS IN 2013 1,028 TRAINING (IN HOUSE) HOURS IN 2013 2,906 TRAINING (OUTSIDE) HOURS IN 2013 1,081 MEETING HOURS IN 2013 991 PUBLIC RELATIONS / FIRE PREVENTION 482 TOTAL • LUNTEER HOURS FOR 2013 J:ladmin\Reports - Fire Incident & Performance21013 Performance Reports12013 Incident Report Pt. O �C G d V d Z O 2 F- O +° CL W F O F- O V Q i Z d W U- M B d d W N ® 0 O W Q, LL ® ?a Z = 0 d O W N Pl. NN to p O O r V N NOS! (O X00 Cc) N ° m O r °O 00 U a W N MOMOM 00 MONOcON VOO 2 W O V M ON sT 0 O w w N Y N 0 tm go d m OU CD O p ) X Q 2 T � I N � p<nXg Ww — _ Q Q~ J Q W a OQ�ZoWQ� ch w N M O O CD(D 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 M N V O V t- W F _ r N Q 111 IL G nM, M d'MO0 (0000a N O� o U 0 0 0 0 O M co V M co M N 7 NN��O00 V 0 f�ON 00 MOOM O M N N .- --'T A N N° O � �O. P N �— NON N'-0O O co O co LO Q j- U V V' (D N N:ON i M r O N d _ p NN (D �(j00 n d.O t N 0.00 N M N 0w a N LL r 1N t- CO N r- M O O N '7 V O O O N(° CO o U C. N 0) m N 0 N N U �_ = m J — LL LL y LL N LL N �- N LL N _� ((- d LL 010 F O io LY K w w w 0� K d Q' N F U U w c W U m O i U d U p Q U 0 Q ¢ a Q Z > Q J Q U 0 O Z O F- W W (� Z d t >_ w Z Oz a Z U7 0- Un (D Z_ 0 0 3� Z FQ. Pl. NN 000 N <t (O Cc) N •- (O ''N U a W Q 2 W 0 O w w Y 0 tm go d m OU CD p ) X Q 2 T � I p<nXg Ww — _ Q Q~ J Q W a OQ�ZoWQ� >1W �p W�UM� �W O O W F W UJ W Q 111 Pl. • • 1! • - Call Breakdown by City for 2013 Minnetrista 69 42 27 1,681 16.6% Spring Park 109 46 63 1,937 19.1% Minnetonka Beach 25 14 11 447 4.4% Shorewood 3 1 _ _ 2 34 0.3% Total 533 256 277 10,154 100% Mutual Aid Breakdown By City For 2013 Cocoran 1 1 38 Loretto Cocoran 1 1 28 Maple Plain Excelsior 1 1 39 Excelsior Green Field 1 1 56 Rockford Independence 2 2 128 Maple Plain Maple Plain 3 3 96 Maple Plain Minnetrista 6 5 1 189 St Boni New Hope 1 1 30 West Metro Orono 2 2 74 Long Lake Orono 1 1 12 Maple Plain St Boni 2 2 144 St Boni St Louis Park 1 1 72 St Louis Park Tonka Bay 2 2 51 Excelsior Total GRAND TOTAL 25 24 1 975 558 280 -33- 278 11,129 Ply • t s LO O u7 O U) O V) O M M C%t N e- r MIE -34- co w h: 0 O 3 a� 0 r m 0 U (6 N m C O N C C cu N N C C I.- Z M P] 8 E S 8 R R 9 R 9 R R w c m # n cli � moil as § § t; \ / m 0 7cc / 2 k } � \ ] # U r!, • s • • O LO O U� O to O Cl) N N slIBO p1V jenjnW -36- N I O N r C) O N O r O N m O O N W v N 13 O > O N � y K d � O O j Y V V :l 0 3 0 s m a 4 Q m m m O d c a C r 0 N_ c v m I PI r' O O O O O O O O N O 00 co V N P P ppeegq66 sinoH -37- o� N� M O N O N _O O N V � � 0 d = 7 V M 7 J t J J PI: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 C C Cl) am M N N r O LO SERoH wm IMT.2 0 N N O N O N O O N T J V b 7 7 V 7 2 V ) ) d M N O C 3 0 a m a D_ Q R A R O m w 0 n N m r m 3 D Pk Q 1 r ui W {L LL 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 o O o o O M M r- W r- CO � W W au W W M W N Ln � r• O 00 � O) 00 m m O LO O Or O O M O O O M O O O O r• I` r- Cn C C C O O � N Q f0 0 N O .0 Cl) LO O co O) O N r- 00 r r• 0) 00 CD Lp V It LO to V" It r- LO N (D Ln Ln LO (D a O N 0) lL N (n Y _ C � O N N > W N C ) v O O V O I�I' Cl) O O O Cl) O r- N LO 0 N M V M C}' O M Ln M Ln r- LO N y b n (D (D in m c v V) V) Ln LO Ln (D LO > n N C N _U E n0 L (-° E O N C N C « t0 p m E d N m r > V O 0 C N r- LO 00 LO O r r• M r (0 V r, r- 4) w w r (3) O N r Cl) LO LO V V to CD (D r O O c o O (D r r• r` r r- r• r- n r� ti r- r 'O y N �e a iT m CL � a � Q V Y 2 0 d N L d V 0 C p N L O) O r N M V LO CD r O O O r N O._ O O O O O O O r Q) C L € jT O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z N c z -39- PI f 4: i 4 O O O O O O O O to O In O Lo O N m cli N N �- sino { I , co N N N T 0 N I 110 O V o Z N w r- O Q Y tl O j F `v N L LD m C LL d 0 LL g 9 � O y V p 6 N d D N S 'c E 9 _N PZ : i i i` E' is O O O O O O O O O 00 to V N O co (O V N r T 1 1-7 sinoH -41- M T O N N T O N T T O N O T O N W O O N U C cu v C 0 CD � � C V O 7 7 V 7 V r a J 9 9 y. M O N C l0 U1 C N t m LL D LL N i0 O d N O n N d O _N C E a S nz � � III " "• I I • Unit Number Description Hennepin Radio Alias ID 17 1981 Sutphen Aerial Ladder Ladder #11 18 1984 Ford Pumper Engine #14 22 1990 E -One Utility Heavy Equipment Command Vehicle Utility #11 24 1996 Freightliner Pumper Engine #12 26 1999 Ford F 250 Crew Utility #12 28 200119' Silver Wolf Boat #11 29 2003 Salisbury Pumper Engine #11 30 2003 Pace American HazMat Trailer Utility #13 33 1986 Chevrolet 1 Ton Grass Rig Mini Pumper Grass #11 34 1998 Ford F -Super Duty Rescue #11 35 2007 Freightliner Tanker /Pumper Tanker #11 37 2008 Polaris 6x6 Utility #15 38 2009 Zodiac 11'C340-15 HP Boat #12 39 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe 44 Rescue #12 40 2010 Freightliner Tanker /Pumper Engine #13 41 2010 Command Resource Trailer Utility #16 42 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe 4x4 Utility #14 -42- J: \admin \Operations \Apparatus \Apparatus Information \Trucks \Apparatus List 2013 P2. Unit Number Description of Apparatus Radio Alias ID Comments 417 1981 Sutphen Aerial Ladder Ladder #11 Replacement 41 Priority # 18 1984 Ford Pumper Engine #14 Sell in fall 2014 # 22 1990 E -One Utility Heavy Utility 411 Equipment Command Vehicle # 24 1996 Freightliner Pumper Engine 412 [Engine #12 - 2nd OR # 26 1999 Ford F 250 Crew Utility #12 neralServic 428 2001 19' Silver Wolf Boat 411 # 29 2003 Salisbury Pumper Engine #11 ngine #11— 1st (7u # 30 2003 Pace Am. HazMat Trailer HazMat #I I [Alias to HazMat Unit #11 HazMat Trailer #33 1986 Chevrolet 1 Ton Grass #11 Grass Rig Mini Pumper # 34 1998 Ford F -Super Duty Rescue #11 Primary EMS Rescue Tr'uc # 35 2007 Freightliner Tanker Pumper Tanker 411 ater Tanker— Large Cap. 750 GPM -3000 Gallon Tank #37 2008 Polaris 6 x 6 SUV Utility #15 ffRoadYehicl" #38 2009 Zodiac I V C340 — 15 HP Boat #12 ew $oat.in 2U09 # 39 2010 Chevy Tahoe SUV 4 x 4 Rescue #12 jChief Command Vehicl'' # 40 2010 Freightliner Tanker Pumper Engine #13 Primary Mutual 1250 GPM — 2000 Gallon Tank # 41 2010 Haulmark Command Trailer Utility #16 # 42 2013 Chevy Tahoe SUV 4 x 4 Utility # 14 Update 04022014 Apparatus - Equipment Hennepin Radio Alias -413- P2 V C O N N CL U R m d z d � Y a >° a i A 0 d z w 2 W Q 1% d Q V C C C co 0 0 0 T T T O O O) O) O O O O t0 O W OJ O O O O N N N N a N N Q Q N m 0 N u�l m U C N C LL N m 0 m N m 6 Q° d LL E i 0 E U P2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O QI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO_ °o °o °o m o m�"rnf9 r, d ym N vrnoNm N T A Q N N C _ Z O H w W w g K W Q W d y c .O G C r O O O N E N Lei O N O A NI A o 0 o O O o A u w d 00 0 0 0 v 0 V m r V O O C5 OC w ds w I A CL u c CL m 4e N O {ti fn0 ONO N O O N pl W f9 1'i W S C A o o c o o a w A c o p y hN OJ '. N o H a r m m 3 w 0 O. N W ^M N d O I8. � oY E Y � p m of Gov E OBI O NV tN0 O M U d N ^M N V G C 000 a a o d = 000000 Y C w 0 0 0 0 C O. 6 p 'O V 7 M OI O O CL d o m m C v N n M Q H N C O. i7 d SA Oq ii LL u U Z d W E V a CL O U O °' °u N t07 m 0 Oar O w d d O. T+ d_ O J F O ro U a 7 9 0 6 6 N v 'O 'U A m F z w U Z m v a m a o E E d v v o ee °'^' a d E w ° L) o° -44 o Z Q W t U c !L utl 2 0 o N ^ 2 a N N Q Q N m 0 N u�l m U C N C LL N m 0 m N m 6 Q° d LL E i 0 E U P2 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT Apparatus Costs for 2013 Tahoe ( #42) Date Ivenclor I invoice No. Description jAmount 4/26/2013 Polar Chev DR289681 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe Special Service 4X4 Utility $29,676.55 5/8/2013 Fire Safety USA 60497 Kussmaul - Super Auto Eject, 15 AMP, Cover Color: Red $235.00 5/13/2013 HotStick USA 3439 Hotstick No. 9005 -02) $299.00 5/15/2013 Metro Fire 47269 Charger Cradle Assy: Altair5, Vehicle $192.37 4/25/2013 Streicher's 11014835 500 Series "linear" Super LED light: No mint, red w /red lens; 500 Series $554.96 "Linear" Super LED light: No mnt, blue w /blue lens; Flangs: Black trim ring for mounting 500 series 4/25/2013 Streicher's 11014836 Super LED Lighthead: M2 w /out flange, red lens, red LED's; Flange: M2 $469.92 super LED, black; Grommet flange for mounding 500 series; Compartment light: white illumination light w /clear lens 4/29/2013 Streicher's 11015625 Leg Kit: Chev Tahoe, Yucon Silverado 2000 +; Top Plate: 29" top plate for $540.96 MCS console; Console pkg: 17" console box w /faceplates (w /o legs, plate); Storage pocket for console boxes, pocket 3W x 7L; Cupholder: double for use w /MCS lowbox. 5/20/2013 Stretcher's 11021537 Supervisors Lightbar: 103 -up torus modules, 07+ Tahoe; Rear Lghtbar: $3,278.92 Citadel w /leds, brackets, Tahoe; Speaker: 100 Watt, compace, tits 2007+ Tahoe /Sub; Lighhead: Dueal 4 Up led's w /bracket, red /blue; LED hid -A- Blast: 9 LED's White; LED HideA- Blast: 9 LED's, Red; Sire: Master -Come w/9 -level light control 6/15/2013 Carquest 6974 - 205425 50 Loom; 50 PVC Split Loom; Butt splice terminals; Slide -on terminals; $234.67 Fuse holders; Ring terminals; Circuit Breaker; HS terminal; Cable Tie; Junction Box; Gauge Wire; Auxiliary power outlet; Aux dual power 6/22/2013 Carquest 6974- 205860 Circuit breaker; Closed -end terminal; Multi- Conductor Cable; Bulk Trailer $176.27 Cable 8/24/2013 Carquest 6974- 210176 50 PVC Split Loom, Fuses, HS Tube /Spool, Heat Shrink Tubing, HS $64.41 Terminal Gage Spl, HS Term 8/31/2013 Carquest 6974 - 210653 Junction Block, Clear RTV Silicone, Rign Terminal, Spade Terminal, HS $104.31 Terminal Gage Spl, 8/31/2013 Carquest 6974 - 210659 Multi-Conductor Cbl $52.37 11/9/2013 Carquest 6974- 215134 Outlet, fuse $27.05 11/6/2013 Carquest 6974 - 214956 Floor Liners $201.32 8/3/2013 True Value 107187 #14 D -Ring $0.52 8/11/2013 True Value 107428 Screws /Nuts /Bolts /Washers $1.71 8/24/2013 True Value 107850 Screws /Nuts /Bolts /Washers, Cable Tie, 16GA Prim Wire, Battery Clip $54.74 10/12/2013 True Value 109278 Auto Fuse Holder, 30A& 15A Ferule Fuses, Ring Terminal $18.75 9/2/2013 Innovative 1386 Custom Organizer for rear storage compartment $2,600.00 Woodworking Solutions 10/7/2013 Amazon Universal Wire VehCIe3 Barrier from Kennel -Aire $80.36 11/6/2013 Napa 872298 Flex Hose $13.06 9/18/2013 Traffic Control 61465 Opticom $1,618.83 TOTAL $40,496.05 -45- 1: \admin \Operations \Apparatus \Apparatus Information \Trucks \42 -2013 Tahoe Duty Vehicle \# 42 Initial Costs P26 v c N N a d U a LJ 6 E Z m m � LL CL CD �° a` D F- 0 z LU LU a. A LL N a o' M � o A N s vi m N LL >, y = a d E R E a o `o v E 0 o y N co 'n o U P2, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O W 1A O O O O p N b 0 0 0 0 0 R N n V ui m N ao ri G ` Q N V! N d O •° ° 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O N N O -� F g 00 c3 m IQ aon C N O p O.ei Z J W U. d LU W C d 6 Q T a a o O N a d g g °o g g g °o o° •O ' w r U) N m d e NIfA eO f9 M � d V O O t O g O T 09 N R r O (R n ji E o o3 of ro uS N R .% N fA to H! N L ° w C C O O O •V ¢ L LL �, O C O O O 6 g O N C In O O O O N C c C V w p goo 0 c a o a d c n . R c 0 0 0 O C 'to U w O O N NI O. C •V fA Vf M R 0. °o g g °o a m y O 9 R y L p R V R U NI � w U — c 7 d ❑ R LL d = O Of LL 00 0 g O V V A O IL O n c E °°° 0 '0 ° ° o W 0 o 0 Iq 0 m It W o 0 o R R V N c' C E O a IL LL d F° 'o c `o a R d •c ZO C_ C c 2E 0 F ¢ o CL v m 25 (L a r U O0 LU a ^b P w d'w ¢> c c rn b Z N O F' J J O m T. d d F- U a.. E N Z 4 3 .�" � "u .L' A CL A w c w d w o w v O O 5 m E t� u R U. ro R u y LL v a¢ a w 0 m v w 4- a LL 0 O d LL r <l[ M 7 t0 1� w t- LL O a N N .. A LL N a o' M � o A N s vi m N LL >, y = a d E R E a o `o v E 0 o y N co 'n o U P2, Z a U g V °v, ao 6 tie O O C O .bx N (6 O C" O O W N O .�b. . a�m M- • N N n N q Qp MM ja[} j r M M �` fA V3 ffl di cli } � d O C a m c+0i o N o �j m coo !��p{. o c a G1 0 1 O O f- `" O ;27f M iD: w o a 0 w U o o O o C Q) •- O ;9: � M O!: � Ln v U m d C ? q N LL « � u d r d fA Hi w to to fR ffl fRii W 19 ,1R: N y) N a` 0 N } v O (0 Oq i0 .�'.f N t0 a'. (0 r co Lo h b t0 01 co t0.. w 0 to to (D m t6 V LO 6Mi m t �' M �j C Q n vv 000 M N . - O n'. W d uj w Ix o r v= W �o W W 69 tiJ 1A 69 fA 49•: (A w to tq Va � N p Z a. t LLI W O o m w z v Q uj w Q (L UL W e CD o O o 0 o q a Y o o m O d o 0 0 0 o c C' o q o U v m 0 0 = VO'- o C O N W pOj m ® m U) r N 00 Cl) �lt0yp to {eVp. ~ C m Cl) N N Cl) lu r <a. Q' O v E ell M p . i LL U � E N NN' E E f p (g N w N LL n 06 o W y > o 0 m c c �w c c d C = U c y � N C Q m N m U w w N H U .d CL (0 z N C Q N O L t o O O U m UZ of a w rti 0- C) O O 2 -47- PI M. 3/6 /2074 rz- Mound Fire Department September 17, 2013 FINAL CategoryMescrimtion Budget Total 2014 e Operating Expenses s Pension Contribution — Relief Assn. e Building Rental, Lease, Debt Service e Salaries for all Staff (all inclusive) e Operations and Supplies e Capital Outlay Salaries for Staff Information: 2014 Budget $ Amount Percent $ 1,102,121.00 100% $ 672,181.00 60.99% $ 147,000.00 13.34% $ 282,940.00 25.67% $ 672,181.00 60.99% $ 410,176.00 37.22% $ 191,480.00 17.37% $ 70,525.00 6.40% e Firefighter Response hours 12,200 per year @ $8.50 per hour = $ 86,700.00 e Duty Crew or Duty Officer Pay (in lieu of firefighter response pay) _ $17,000.00 e Firefighter in -house Training hours 3000 - 3100 per year @ $4.80 per hour= $14,880.00 e Firefighter Station Maintenance hours 980 per year @ $11 per hour= $10,780.00 e Apparatus Heavy Maintenance hours 240 per year @ $14.00 per hour= $3,360.00 s Fire Officer Pay (refer to separate list for officer pay details)_ $30,350.00 e Firefighter meetings, PR events, other hours 1600 per year @ $0 per hour = $0 M 00 P31 O O O O O O O O N C) -It e4 � O vi 00 � h � O ry M V- N M �--� M N 00 ® .�. N �a It 69 69 69 69 ron fE3 6f3 b9 Q± M N E � e O p O M M h 1n M N ��. N W M 0 h tr 44 6n �ls 64 69 Wl 69 69 69 y y ti O 11 2 (6 rn DO Piz '� V � Rq ❑3 � O -50- M O t� ,D w^M i O A A O O U F W 0 7 N N N F 4L Q a w P3 0 N ® N °-� P4' O W --� n O O O rF O 00 N O �o O eY O V O O h H�4 69 69 69 69 64 ff3 69 64 d � w N a � O O O O O O O O O N C) -It e4 � O vi 00 � h � O ry M V- N M �--� M N 00 ® .�. N �a It 69 69 69 69 ron fE3 6f3 b9 Q± M N E � e O p O M M h 1n M N ��. N W M 0 h tr 44 6n �ls 64 69 Wl 69 69 69 y y ti O 11 2 (6 rn DO Piz '� V � Rq ❑3 � O -50- M O t� ,D w^M i O A A O O U F W 0 7 N N N F 4L Q a w P3 0 N ® N °-� P4' O W --� n O O O rF O 00 N O �o O eY O V O O h H�4 69 69 69 69 64 ff3 69 64 d O O O O O O O O N C) -It e4 � O vi 00 � h � O ry M V- N M �--� M N 00 ® .�. N �a It 69 69 69 69 ron fE3 6f3 b9 Q± M N E � e O p O M M h 1n M N ��. N W M 0 h tr 44 6n �ls 64 69 Wl 69 69 69 y y ti O 11 2 (6 rn DO Piz '� V � Rq ❑3 � O -50- M O t� ,D w^M i O A A O O U F W 0 7 N N N F 4L Q a w P3 P3: s y b o w U T U U bA C cd to o op cz E0- ci. m bq V, W c� �..' 0 d "O q Xo h Q a'�i cOC O C, qQ� -cq u N 0 w w a3i to v w w W W a°i Cd Z w Z V) eo x O O 00 .a U N N Qd R O �O 00 ® ,� O �O N t, N N V N M C1 M bAD 69 69 69 69 GO) 6R 64 fA 6R 69 ff3 69 E . 8 � O O O O O O O v1 'n CD h rp� M VI M M M M M N N 69 69 fA 69 69 69 fA 69 69 69 4A 69 In �o d' 7 N O 64 .Ns N MO y0 fIi O N 64 U ® •� W U N ate+ UU U U a � v � 3 °° ° a a o ..U. V b0 w 4a O ai �C � � 6a F h ,It v d o 0 „ w # # o u Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r N N N N N N N N N N N N # # P3: Cpl P3; N Q' O O +.' R' '7 U O O inn � �/] y NN, � �y 1°1 Vl 43 iti b 1-1 � y [i/•jY � Cd zw Cd U COO O O O w C 'b � O � O °� � e'! •� � R3 Uv O � Y. 4+ U U C U to U O o L U ti ou � co ry�6/d U r3 O 0 U UO 9 C/ TS U ob a N a v w o a ytt a CV ® J V•4 W 1•[ ` CIO) ! V U COO O ® O¢ W 00 r4 N Y O N M VA kA O kr � O v� bA .^ O 00 00 l0 .H yO .�-i 69 00 �w f!3 Q-I iy y 00 69 U U ++ V +" O N O U w Q w O > Q b cc A � � C-, i U O �p+ to ,,,,// �i � f�•a ctf O O # O X52 v v Cpl P3; m 0 N m N h O a� � no m P3, oo coo � U � CIO U &9 U � On W Fn O O ® cl M 7 kn �• b d O N M C• ,O 69 E!3 Y JZ W sys y y O R O O C U N A U A as 0 0 ti m vi y O W b h tm c •� w V O 0 °a U o0 O .b U cd c'Jd U N � wl ~ O v Cl O u OU z O O O O O v U 8 on 'L$ h .-� t�j C. N F -�-� ® .-r W a U b9 69 59 Fig H 0 .y U O •O C.a 4a O N U is N ' N bA U Gtr b VS N N to •vV. E cAC R C of) N FA f-Q u vim' 4o A? W 0.a �rj d 3N as ' U U U m w(yi y O m Q .flb v,a C� Tqy S O to F9 ti O DU '> U O -El lu A o cq NO O C14 O (14 ^ccc^v m 0 N m N h O a� � no m P3, Mound Fire Department Year Description of Grant Items Amount Source 2003 Life Safety Trailer for Haz Mat - fully $39,850.00 * UASI /DEM HC Emergency equipped with decontamination and Preparedness detections equipment 2003 800 MHz Radios - mobiles & portables $30,800.00 Metropolitan Radio Board 2004 Federal funds to investigate for $24,250.00 U.S. Economic Development cleanup of the Western Area Fire Administration Training Site (WAFTA) 2004 Firefighter Safety - Fill station, Thermal $23,185.00 FEMA Firefighter Grant Imaging Camera, Gas Detector program 2005 Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (air $15,750.00 UASI /DEM HC Emergency tanks & masks for firefighters) Preparedness 2006 Mobile Data Computers (MDC) for $15,000.00 USAI /Homeland Security Installation in the fire apparatus - 3 each 2009 Radio Grant for 800 MHz Portable $13,225.00 Metro Emergency Services Board - PSIC Grant 2010 Gas Detector Monitors & Calibration $1,900.00 Centerpoint Energy (50% System match required) 2011 Rehab, Decon, and HazMat Equipment $6,300.00 HCEP /UASI Homeland for Life Safety Unit, including Gas Security Monitors, Cooling Chairs, CO Monitors, Misting Unit 2012 Motorola Fire Pagers - Centerpoint $1,000.00 * Centerpoint Energy Energy Matching grant to buy 4 Community Partnership firefighter pagers 2012 Firefighter Training $6,509.23 Mn Board of Firefighter Training & Education 2013 Live Burn (Idlewood Rd Training Burn) $1,500.00 Mn Board of Firefighter Training & Education 2013 Firefighter Training $8,400.00 Mn Board of Firefighter Training & Education 2014 2 Mustang Cold Water Rescue Suits, 1 $4,600.00 * Lake Minnetonka floating water pump, 1 radio with Conservation District headset TOTAL 5192,269.23 -54- J: \admin \Financia I, Budgets, Expenses \fire department grant summary P3; Year Description of Grant Items Amount Source 2006 Self Contained Breathing Apparatus $26,310.00 * Homeland Security (for daily use, rescue, and general Assistance to FF Grant response) 2007 Self Contained Breathing Apparatus $9,543.00 * Homeland Security and Breathing Air fill Compressor Assistance to FF Grant 2008/09 Tanker Pumper 2500 gallon Apparatus $73,601.00 * Homeland Security with 1,000 GPM pump Assistance to FF Grant 2008/09 Training funding assistance - Driving $19,130.00 * Homeland Security Fire Officer II, HazMat, Fire Motor Assistance to FF Grant Operator 2009 Firefighter Training - various classes $15,975.00 * Homeland Security AFG - FEMA 2009 Aerial Ladder Truck Refurbish or $225,000.00 * Homeland Security AFG- Replace FEMA 2009 Aerial Ladder Truck Refurbish or $935,000.00 * Homeland Security AFG- Replace FEMA 2011 Personal Protective Equipment 30 new $9,750.00 * Homeland Security AFG- sets of firefighter boots ($319 /per pair) FEMA 2011 Bauer High Pressure 13 CFM 6000 PSI $31,915.00 * Homeland Security AFG- Breathing Air Compressor with fill FEMA containment system, plus install costs 2013 SCBA Masks $1,500.00 * Centerpoint Energy Community Partnership Currently Working On 2006/07 Federal Funding to clean up Western $6,000,000.00 * U.S. Economic Development Area Fire Training Academy site ground Administration contamination issues * Note: Indicates some matching funds required 55- P \admin \Financial, Budgets, Expenses \fire department grant summary P31 e} C � O O y C CL w U ou a 4 d E m T Z m d 'O d W m R CL 0 y O L >- d O O. F z W W O w CaC G J h d 4 U U 10 IL rn a m N N m M N r � O � N . L N k a N J jy O C N N m E 'O O1 O > � O 0 o E o - N N o � U P3; Mound Fire Department 2013 Accomplishments: The Mound Fire Relief Association Pension Plan Improvement Plan Project was completed and implemented effective on January 1, 2013. Continued to successfully lead an active Fire Commission group by facilitating the quarterly meetings and by working with our fire service partners. Resulting in open communications and cooperation on financial and budget challenges, fire contract concerns, and any potential fire department operational issues. 9 Successfully managed all of the fire department administration and operational challenges with the help of a full time Administrative Assistant and the on -going support of approximately 40 Paid -On -Call firefighters. Restructured our Chief Officer and Chain -of- Command positions with new job descriptions and duties that all became effective in April 2013. Created a comprehensive up -to -date department Employee Handbook and Policy and Procedure Manual, with new procedures and a new improved format. 9 Implemented a new Incident Command training program for ten (10) Fire Officers throughout 2013. Effectively managed a well trained professional staff of 40 fire department personnel. Hired and completed basic firefighter and emergency medical training of six (6) new probationary firefighters. Implemented a new Incident Command training program for ten (10) Fire Officers throughout 2013. Continued to focus on fire prevention, fire inspections, and fire code enforcement programs through participation in numerous major projects such as Westonka Schools remodel, several residential developments, and others. Prepared and effectively managed the 2013 Fire Department Budget. Managed the budget within the overall budgeted increase of 1.76 %. The year -end fire fund balance is in a positive financial position at approximately $317,000. Implemented cost saving measures while improving department technology by replacing old Mobile Data Computers (in fire trucks) with newer less expensive Apple (Pads. The cost savings is approximately $6,600 per year, with improved functionality and better overall performance. In 2013, the fire department staff responded to 558 emergency calls of all types while protecting five (5) communities, with a total of 11,129 responder hours. A Continued to lead the City of Mound Safety Committee, while facilitating new training programs and leading the safety committee meetings. Created and implemented a comprehensive Automatic Aid Program to help support the fire response and public safety needs of the City of St. Bonifacius which became effective in 2013. Studied and Developed a new Job Performance Standard for Firefighting Staff and established a comprehensive new Performance Measurement program. -57- j:\admin \admin & organization annual report\mfd accomplishments 2013.docx P31 Efforts underway, but not yet completed: ➢ Continue to implement our on -going apparatus replacement program through insightful planning, cost effective and timely purchases that better meet the needs of today's fire and rescue services. Lack of funds is now delaying progress on the apparatus replacement program. ➢ In 2013, we made very significant progress on updating and creating improved fire department administrative policies, procedures, and standard operating guidelines that are now organized in a more appropriate, up -to -date format. ➢ The Succession and Staffing Plan for the fire department is incessant, and critical. Our short term plan and long term goals include: high quality staff training and personnel development as an uppermost priority and ultimate goal. ➢ In very near future will need to implement a revised staffing model and modify our resource deployment plan. We will utilize a staffing plan that is more time conscious and efficient. This plan will include the use of Duty Officers, possibly Duty Crews, and /or assigned work shifts for firefighters. ➢ Continue to work with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and environmental contractor AMEC on a resolution of the ground contamination and pollution issues on WAFTA training site. ➢ Working on and preparing for an Insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification Audit that will culminate in April 2014. Goals /steeds of the fire department: ➢ Continue to maintain existing fire service contracts with our fire service customer cities and possibly expand our fire service protection area in Western Hennepin County, as feasible and appropriate. ➢ Strongly consider creating a larger comprehensive Fire District, and ultimately operate fire stations within the West Hennepin County Suburban Area, the City of Minnetrista. Possibly consolidate resources with other cities and fire departments in the relatively near future. ➢ Increase our intensity level (even more) as it relates to firefighter staff development and improvement by continued recruiting, hiring, training, and maintaining our high quality staff of volunteer firefighters. ➢ Focus our efforts on developing high quality "realistic" staff training programs.... in lieu of On- the - Job - Training. We cannot rely on OJT today, as structure fires and major incidents occur less today than they did 25 years ago. ➢ Increased financial support of the Fire Apparatus Replacement Program with emphasis on capital equipment budgeting, creative financing and sensible purchases with a goal to improve efficiency, replace critical fire apparatus Le. Ladder Truck, and reduce our ever increasing truck maintenance costs. ➢ Pursue grant funding to meet financial needs for both staffing and apparatus replacement programs. -58- jAadmm \adman & organization \annual report\mfd accomplishments 2013.docx P3S Pension Division Newsletter November 2013 Inside this issue: Supplementol Benefit Reimbursements 'New Audit Threshold Working Group Update Donations from a Special Fund i !State Aid and Forfeiture Deadline Pension Division Staff I i i Office of the State Auditor Pension Division 525 Park Street, Suite 500 Saint Paul, MN 55103 (651) 282 -6110 Fax: (651) 282 -5298 p ension@osa. state. mn us 0 New Supplemental State Aid Program A new supplemental state aid program was established during the 2013 legislative session to provide additional funding for fire and police retirement plans. Effective for the fiscal year that began July 1, 2013, an appropriation of $15,500,000 annually will be made to the new aid program. Of this appropriation, about $5.5 million will be allocated annually for volunteer fire relief associations and for volunteer firefighters covered by the voluntary Statewide Plan administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA). The remaining amount will be allocated to the PERA police and fire fund and to the state patrol plan administered by the Minnesota State Retirement System. The supplemental state aid amount that a relief association receives will be equal to the proportionate share that each association currently receives of fire state aid. A list of the 2013 state aid amounts for each relief association is available on the OSA website at: http:!/ www.auditar.state.mn.usJdafault aspx��a e= 20110527 003. The supplemental state aid is paid at the same time as the fire state aid. A state aid payment is usually made by an electronic funds transfer from the State to the municipality affiliated with the relief association. The supplemental state aid and fire state aid are paid in two separate transfers, with both transfers occurring on the same date. The municipality must transfer the supplemental state aid to the treasurer of the relief association within 30 days of receipt for deposit in the association's Special Fund. A relief association becomes eligible to receive supplemental state aid when all reporting requirements are met with the OSA, and the association has satisfied its reporting requirements with other government offices. It is important to note that the supplemental state aid program will automatically terminate once the funding ratio of the PERA police and fire fund or the state patrol plan equals or exceeds 90 percent, whichever occurs last. The termination of the program should be taken into consideration when considering benefit improvements. © 2013 Office of the State Auditor An Equal Opportunity Employer This Newsletter does not contain legal aG15.9 7and its contents are subject to revision. P41 Pension Division. Newsletter November 2013 -9- -60- Pa Supplemental Benefit Reimbursements What's Ahead: The Minnesota Department of Revenue (DOR) sent a letter to each relief association regarding changes to the process for seeking reimbursement of any supplemental benefits paid during November 30: 2013. The reimbursement form is now available online, and the Final deadline for DOR is requiring that relief associations submit the form online. submitting 2012 Paper reimbursement forms will no longer be accepted. reporting -year forms to j avoid forfeiture of fire I The DOR is also requiring that relief association's provide their state aid. Minnesota ID number on the reimbursement form. If you do not i know your relief association's ID number, you can obtain it by i calling (651) 282 -5225. December 5: Another important change is that reimbursement forms will be "Working Group Meeting accepted only between November 15 and February 15 (extended to from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 February 17 in 2014). If your relief association seeks p.m. at the office of the reimbursement of supplemental benefits paid during 2013, the OSA. reimbursement form must be submitted to the DOR between November 15, 2013 and February 17, 2014, to receive reimbursement in March 2014. If your relief association misses this December 1S: filing period, your association cannot submit the reimbursement Working Group Meeting I request until the filing period begins again the following from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 November 15. p.m. at the office of the The reimbursement form, instructions, and a sample form are OSA. i I available on the DOR website at: http: / /www.revenue.state.mn.us /local sov /prop tax admin/Paees/ sbr.aspx. January 15: Certified Listing of Relief associations are required to pay a supplemental benefit to Individuals Who Filed a each member who receives a lump sum distribution. For pensions Statement of Economic and disability benefits, the amount of the supplemental benefit is Interest due to the equal to 10 percent of the lump sum distribution, up to a maximum Campaign Finance and of $1,000. For survivor benefits, the amount of the supplemental Public Disclosure Board benefit is equal to 20 percent of the survivor benefit distribution, up to a maximum of $2,000. In both cases, the supplemental benefit should be calculated based February 17. on the pension or benefit amount before any deferred interest is Final deadline for added. In addition, deferred interest should not accrue on the submitting 2013 Supplemental Benefit supplemental benefit. Supplemental benefits are PP pp payable to Reimbursement Forms I members who are fully vested as well as to those who are partially to the Department of vested. Revenue I -9- -60- Pa Employee Handbook Officers Firefighters i This Handbook is provided to help employees of the Mound Fire Department become acquainted with department policies, procedures and operating guidelines. Employees are responsible for understanding and complying with current department policies at all times. me Poi INTRODUCTION. ........................................................... ................................. ..............................7 Visionand Mission ........................................................................................ ..............................7 History... ........................................................................................................ ..............................7 RiskManagement Philosophy ....................................................................... ..............................8 National Incident Management System ........................................................ ..............................8 Chainof Command ....................................................................................... ..............................8 Lawsand Standards ....................................................................................... ..............................9 Scope............................................................................................................. ..............................9 Purpose.......................................................................................................... ..............................9 Content.......................................................................................................... ..............................9 Provisions Superseded in Certain Cases ....................................................... ..............................9 Policies, Procedures and Operating Guidelines ........................................... .............................10 FiscalYear .................................................................................................... .............................10 Definitions.................................................................................................... .............................10 MEMBERSHIP AND EMPLOYMENT .......................................................... .............................13 Equal Employment Opportunity .................................................................. .............................13 HonoraryMembers ....................................................................................... .............................13 StaffingLimit ............................................................................................... .............................13 SeniorityList ................................................................................................ .............................13 Hiringand Selection ..................................................................................... .............................13 DataPractices ............................................................................................... .............................14 ApplicantQualifications ............................................................................... .............................14 Pre - employment Medical Exams ................................................................. .............................15 SelectionProcess .......................................................................................... .............................15 21Page -62- M BackgroundChecks ...................................................................................... .............................15 Firefighter Eligibility and Continued Employment ...................................... .............................16 Residency and Availability Requirements ................................................... .............................16 Training and Certification Requirements ..................................................... .............................16 Health and Physical Ability Requirements .................................................. .............................17 Medical Exams and Assessments ................................................................. .............................17 PhysicalAgility Test .................................................................................... .............................18 MaskFit Test ................................................................................................ .............................18 PermanentMedical File ................................................................................ .............................18 Promotions and Job Postings ........................................................................ .............................18 Selection Process for Officers ...................................................................... .............................19 ProbationaryPeriod ...................................................................................... .............................19 Employment of Relatives ............................................................................. .............................20 Discipline...................................................................................................... .............................20 ComplaintProcess ........................................................................................ .............................21 Resignation................................................................................................... .............................22 Termination Process ..................................................................................... .............................22 Compensation............................................................................................... .............................22 ATTENDANCE AND LEAVE ........................................................................ .............................24 Individual and Department Performance Standards ..................................... .............................24 Emergency Response Attendance ................................................................ .............................24 BusinessMeetings ........................................................................................ .............................25 Training Drills Attendance ........................................................................... .............................25 Attendance — Business Meetings and Training Drills .................................. .............................25 31Paoe -63- Pa, Station and Equipment Maintenance ............................................................ .............................26 Familyand Medical Leave ........................................................................... .............................27 Eligibility...................................................................................................... .............................27 VacationLeave ............................................................................................. .............................27 Leave of Absence or Suspension .................................................................. .............................27 OffDuty related Medical Leave ................................................................... .............................28 Line of Duty Medical Leave ........................................................................ .............................29 LightDuty .................................................................................................... .............................29 MilitaryLeave .............................................................................................. .............................30 JuryDuty ...................................................................................................... .............................31 CourtTime ................................................................................................... .............................31 MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION ... .............................32 Membership.................................................................................................. .............................32 Retirement Program and Pension Benefits ................................................... .............................32 Pension Service Credit Determination ......................................................... .............................32 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................... .............................33 Performance Reviews and Measurement ..................................................... .............................33 Training and Development — Conferences and Schools .............................. .............................33 Travel and Business Expenses ..................................................................... .............................33 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT RULES AND POLICIES ............................ .............................35 GeneralConduct ........................................................................................... .............................35 Conflictsof Interest ...................................................................................... .............................35 Acceptance of Gifts and Gratuities .............................................................. .............................36 Alcoholand Other Drug Use ........................................................................ .............................36 41Page .� P4; TobaccoUse ................................................................................................. .............................36 Communication Technology and Resources ................................................ .............................37 Media Relations and Public Information ...................................................... .............................37 SocialMedia ................................................................................................. .............................37 Confidential Information ............................................................................. ..............................3 8 Dressand Uniform ....................................................................................... .............................38 Driver's Licenses .......................................................................................... .............................38 AuthorizedDrivers ....................................................................................... .............................39 Special License Plates and Personal Vehicle Identification ......................... .............................39 PersonalAreas .............................................................................................. .............................39 PoliticalActivity ........................................................................................... .............................39 RespectfulBehavior ..................................................................................... .............................40 Safetyand Security ....................................................................................... .............................41 Weapons....................................................................................................... .............................41 FACILITY AND EQUIPMENT USAGE ........................................................ .............................42 GeneralUsage .............................................................................................. .............................42 ApparatusBay .............................................................................................. .............................42 OfficeAreas ................................................................................................. .............................42 ExerciseRoan ............................................................................................. .............................42 Fire Department Equipment Usage .............................................................. .............................42 Visitorsat the Fire Station ............................................................................ .............................43 Property Loss or Damage ............................................................................. .............................43 5 1 P a g e -65- P4f RELATED POLICIES 101.01 Sexual and Other Unlawful Harassment 101.02 Uniforms and Personal Appearance 101.03 Media Relations and Technology Use 101.04 Auto and Fire Vehicle Usage 101.08 Travel Expense 102.01 Physical Agility Testing 104.01- 104.14 Job Descriptions 201.04 Mask Fit Test 301.07 Protective Clothing and Equipment *Related policies are located in the MFD Administrative Policy and Procedure Manual 61Page no P4' o Mobile Data Computers (MDC) Laptop o Wad Tablets 10" tablet with retina display 7" mini tablet ® Large and Expensive o Slow to Respond ® Stays in vehicle at all times o Interface data link o Two —way communication Calls on screen o Fire preplans Small and Lower Price o Fast to Respond o Easy to remove o Able to take pictures at scene o Directions on screen o Automatic updates o Calls on screen Mapping and Directions e Fire preplans M. 4/2/2014 1 P4( Operating Cost (per Unit) Over Five Years P Cost per unit = $7,400 ® Amortized over 60 months = $123.33 Verizon monthly service fee = $34.99 e Hennepin County monthly service fee = $30.25 � Cost per unit = $800.37 o Amortized over 60 months = $13.34 � Verizon monthly service fee = $34.99 o Apps = $1.00 per month 0 2 Wad mini's installed in station ® 4 10" iPads ordered and ready to install in apparatus ( #29, #39, #40, #42) 4 more 10" (Pads (as needed) to be ordered the coming year for additional apparatus ® 10 total IPads for MFD no 4/2/2014 1 P5( Contact Greg Pederson Telephone 952- 472 -3555 Fax 952- 472 -3775 Email moundfire @moundfire.com Website Moundfirel.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 26, 2014 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT PURCHASES THERMAL IMAGING CAMERAS WITH FUNDS FROM OUR ANNUAL FISH FRY AND A DONATION FROM THE MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT AUXILIARY Mound, MN, February 26, 2014— The Mound Fire Department recently purchased two Thermal Imaging Cameras at a price of $6,100 each. 75% of the costs of the cameras were paid with proceeds from the Mound Fire Department's Annual Fish Fry, and a donation from the Mound Volunteer Fire Department's Auxiliary. A Thermal Imaging Camera (TIC) is an important tool available to our firefighters. TICS have many uses in fire department operations. In a fire, a firefighter may not be able to see though smoke, but the TIC's can assist in locating a person by reading different temperatures. When investigating a possible fire, the TIC can detect "hot spots" inside a wall. A thermal imaging camera will also give useful information about parts of afire that are still hot. These areas need to be extinguished again in order to prevent rekindling of a fire. If you would like more information about this topic, please contact Greg Pederson at 952- 472 -3555 or email at moundfire @moundfire.com. -70- j: \adrrin \public relations \news release \2 -26 -14 tic press release.docx P5 Contact Vicki Weber FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Telephone 952- 472 -3555 Fax 952- 472 -3775 August 15, 2013 Email gpederson @moundfire.com website Moundfirel.com MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT Receives Minnesota Fire Board of firefighter Training & Education Grant The Mound Fire Department is pleased to announce we have been the recipient of the Minnesota Fire Board of Firefighter Training and Education Grant. We recently submitted qualified training reimbursement request to the Minnesota Fire Board of Firefighter Training and Education and were awarded $8,400.00. The Minnesota Fire Board of Firefighter Training and Education has a Training Reimbursement program available to fire departments. This award enables the Mound Fire Department to send many of our company officers and firefighters to various trainings throughout the year to ensure our department is staffed with competent and skilled firefighters. -71- P5: Contact Greg Pederson Telephone 952- 472 -3555 Fax 952- 472 -3775 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 27, 2014 Email gpederson @moundfire.com Website Moundfire.com MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT Receives Lake Minnetonka Conversation District -2014 "Save the Lake" Funds The Mound Fire Department is pleased to announce we are a recipient of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District — 2014 "Save the Lake" Funds. We recently submitted grant application to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District — "Save the Lake" Fund and were awarded $4,600.00. Save the Lake is a non - profit fund that invests in programs that benefit the environmental and recreational needs of Lake Minnetonka. To qualify, projects must fit into one of three categories: public safety, environmental, or public service /education. The submitted grant application was for the purchase of life safety equipment that included two ice rescue suits, a floatable water pump, and a portable radio with headset. The total equipment cost is $9,200 and will split between the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Mound Fire Department. This award enables the Mound Fire Department to continue its tradition of excellence in service on Lake Minnetonka. If you would like more information about this topic, please contact Greg Pederson at 952 -472- 3555 or email at gpederson @moundfire.com. -72- P5; Contact Greg Pederson Telephone 952- 472 -3533 Fax 952- 472 -3775 Email moundfire @moundfire.com Website moundfire.com FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 1, 2014 SIX FIREFIGHTERS COMPLETE GRUELING PROBATION Mound, MN, April 1, 2014 —Over its long history, the Mound Fire Department has been very successful in maintaining a full complement of volunteer firefighters. On March 15, 2014, six new Mound firefighters completed all of the training and attendance requirements necessary to become permanent members of the fire department. The time and effort required to meet the essentials of the one year probationary period are very demanding. Congratulations to new firefighters Nick Farley, Danny Grady, Chris Heitz, Jed Kobernusz, Aaron Morrison and Dan Patterson! The hiring of these six firefighters helps support the immediate department staffing needs, and plans ahead as we anticipate future firefighter retirements. Hiring the six firefighters now will allow us to continue to have a fully trained staff to continue provide excellent protection now and in the future. If you are interested in becoming a firefighter with the Mound Fire Department, we are always accepting applications. You can print an application form by visiting our website www. moundfire.com, or stop by our office. If you would like more information about this topic, please contact Greg Pederson at 952- 472 -3555 or email at moundfire @moundfire.com. -73- P5, 74- • 4 .1 pq s • P5! 4/2/2014 Goals: • to utilize firefighter staff time more efficiently and effectively. • to minimize unnecessary wasted staff time and reduce the individual firefighters overall time commitment. Call out staff when needed, by the specific CAD event type and per the level of incident risk. High Risk Incident (more staff ALL CALL), Low Risk Incident (less staff DUTY OFFICER). Maintain current service quality levels, while continuing to be conscious of cost controls and tight budgets. No staffing budget increase, plus maintain our staff! Why Departments change Firefighter Staff Response? • Not Enough Volunteer Staff (for Life Safety and Response) • Short on Volunteer Staff (during specific time periods) • To Improve Response Times • Reduce Volunteer Firefighter Time Commitment • Can be a more efficient use of time for Volunteer Firefighters • Insure that a well trained Command Officer is on scene • Use a qualified Officer for non - emergency service calls -75- rsf '' • Less "All Call" Page Outs • Less "All Call" payroll $$ • Faster "In Service" Time • Less use of large Apparatus • Easier Firefighter Tracking • Old Perf Measurement • Easy Administration • Business as usual • Existing Officer Requirements • Old SOP's • CAD Programming as is • FD Paging System as is Cons (Challenges) • Must have scheduled Shifts • More shift work payroll $$ • Officer SOP's and Training • More DO Vehicles needed • Difficult Firefighter Tracking • New Perf Measurement • Difficult Administration • A Major Change in Operation • New Officer Requirements • New SOP's and Training • CAD Programming Changes • Paging System Changes Emergency Response Protocol - Action Plan • Order necessary Vehicles and Equipment to support the program • Evaluate the Budgeted Allocation vs. Compensation needed to support the program and finalize the $ $ payroll system • Finalize Duty Officer Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and identify the specific CAD Event Code types • Design or Configure a scheduling and new Performance Measurement system for Officers /Staff • Set -up the new Duty Officer payroll tracking system • Complete Basic Training of Officers on program Rules and SOP's • Implement Duty Officer Test Program (target date May 1, 2013) • Evaluate Test Program over a period of 3 -6 months, make changes and /or improvements as necessary • Implement Duty Officer Program on a full time basis! -76- 4/2/2014 2 P5' January —April 5, 2014 Voluntary Test Period r (14) Weeks — VoluntaryTest Period on Weekends ONLY! ® 24 hour shifts ONLY and on weekends, $50 stipend plus call pay. a Signup sheet to be posted for signup (weekends only) April 6, 2014 — Dec. 31, 2014 Full Implementation (38) weeks in 2014 @ (8) weeks each (5 weekdays) for each Chief Officer B (8) weekend shifts 24 hrs. each for Captains and Lieutenants -77- 4/2/2014 3 PSI 0 Sunday Night thru Friday Morning (5) Nights • I0:00pm — 6:OOam • 40 Hours per week - $100 per week, plus call pay ® Friday Night —Sunday • 6:OOpm- 6:OOam Friday /Saturday (12 hours) • 6:OOam- 6:OOpm Saturday (12 hours) • 6:OOpm- 6:OOam Saturday /Sunday (12 hours) • 6:OOam- 6:OOpm Sunday (12 hours) • 2 -24 hr. shifts per weekend - $75 per shift, plus call pay • 48 hours of coverage on the weekend 1. Agree on the Test Program for remainder of 2014 2. Implement a Scheduling System for remainder of 2014 3. Finish programing Hennepin County Sherriff Radio CAD System with Days of Week, DC -DO Tunes, and Call Types. 4. Finalize DC -DO Response SOP 5. Finalize DC -DO Vehicle Use Policy 6. Purchase and Program Fire Pagers, and Implement the DC -DO Paging System. 7. Finalize DC -DO Incident Report System (Darren - Chief) 8. Create a system for tracking and payroll. 9. Test and Evaluate throughout 2014, adjust as needed. M 4/2/2014 rd P5- Duty Program - SOP Basics DRAFT • Duty Officer and Vehicle to remain within our Fire District, except when responding to auto aid into Minnetrista and St. Bonifscius. • Duty Chief and Vehicle to respond outside our Fire District when responding to Mutual Aid (outside of Minnetrista and St. Bonifacius) • When on duty, the DC and /or DO will respond in DC- DOVehicle directly to scene for every "All Call" page except EMS Medicals or when responding from the fire station. (Le. during maintenance) • A Officer can utilize the DC -DO vehicle for personal errands during scheduled shifts, but must be able to make necessary red runs. • Unfortunately, no family members to be transported in Duty Vehicles due to possible emergency response calls. • DO Vehicle cleanup at end of weekend shift and on Saturday morning maintenance , and filled with fuel (as needed). %." i ' • r ` . -: �., • a . Imo. • �, ,. • During Duty Chief and Duty Officer shifts, the DC -DO are to check into service with 2 minutes of fire page. • The DC -DO will be responsible for initial radio communications with Hennepin County Sherriff Dispatch, and until IC has been transferred. • Other Mound Fire Officers responding will monitor radio traffic and respond to dispatch only when necessary. • The DC -DO will be responsible for transferring their PPE into duty vehicle. When operating in the hot or warm zone they will wear PPE as if they arrived on an Engine. • The first arriving officer at a scene will be the Fire Ground IC at the incident, and will be responsible for initial size up, 360, resource management and direction, box alarms, staging, slowing or cancelling resources, updates, in some cases assuming or transferring command. -79- 4/2/2014 5 P61 4/2/2014 I ' ! • ' :. 1 • The DC -DO Program is intended to enhance our customer service and add efficiency to our existing protocols. Dress professionally! • The DC -DO program is for service calls and faster response IC. It is not intended to replace 40 firefighters and multiple apparatus. • Utilize "All Call" option as needed! Error on the side of safety. • Life Safety and Safe Driving Practices are aTop Priority, therefore Code 3 and Routine Response Protocols must be followed. DRIVE SAFE! • All Officers must take the time to inspect and survey the DC -DO Vehicle to locate and identify tools, equipment, forms, and information. • All Officers must take the time to learn DC -DO Vehicle Operating Systems (Le. lights, sirens, etc.) • Duty Chiefs and Duty Officers will be required to create a written incident report after each DC -DO Call. :1 P6 MFD DUTY OFFICER HENNEPIN COUNTY RADIO DISPATCH EMS EVENTS FIRE EVENTS E1- EMS /PRI 1 F1 ...................... Fire /PRI 1 E3- EMS /PRI 3 F3 ...................... Fire /PRI 3 ALLERG- Allergic React ALMAPT ............ ALM Fire /Apartmt ALMS - Alarm /Medical ALMBUS ............ ALM Fire /Busines AMPUTA- Amputation ALMCO .............. ALM Carbon Monox BLEED - Bleeding ALMCOE............ ALM C/O Medical BONE- Broken Bones ALMFAL............ ALM Fire /False BREATH - Breathing Problem ALMHSE ............ ALM Fire /House BURN -Burn ALMSCH ............ ALM Fire /School CHOKE - Choking ALMTBL............ ALM Fire/Trouble DIABET- Insulin Problem APPL .................. Appliance Fire DIZZY - Dizzy /Faint APT .................... Apartment Fire DOA - Reported Dead *ASTFIR .............Assist/Fire DOWN- Down /Unk Prob *use for: elevators, manpower DROWN- Drowning assists on lifts, searches, etc FALL -Fall BOAT ................. Boat Fire HEAD -Head Injury BUS.- ................ Business Fire HEART -Heart CAR ................... Vehicle Fire ILL -ill CHIM .................. Chimney Fire OB -Birth of Baby CKBURN ........... Ck Problem Burn OD -Drug Overdose DRILL ................. Drill or Test PAIN -Pain DUMPF .............. Dumpster Fire POISON- Poison ELEC ................. Electrical Fire SEIZ- Seizure EXPLOS ............ Explosion SHOOT - Shooting FIRE4 ................. Fire Out Report STAB - Stabbing FIREIV ............... Fire Investigation STROKE - Stroke GARAGE ........... Garage Fire SUICID- Suicide GASO ................ Gas Odor UNCON- Unconscious GRASS .............. Grass Fire AIR- Aircraft Incident HAZMAT ... ......... Hazardous Matter PI- Accident/Injuries HOUSE .............. House Fire Water -Water Incident INSP ..................Inspection Lift Assist -Lift Assist MA (Fire Only) .... Mutual Aid PRACTI .............. Practice Burn RESCUE............ Rescue /Extricate SCHOOL............ School Fire Important Note: The bold and SMOKE .............. Smoke See /Smell highlighted CAD event codes are the SPILL ................. Spill event types that will be responded to by SYSTEM ............ System Down a MFD Duty Officer ONLY unless DO TREE ................. Tree /Pole Fire request ALL CALL. WASH... ............. Washdown WIREA ............... Wire Arcing WIRED ............... Wire Down -81- eAduty officer program overview 8 -2013 \ems - fire events - duty crew.doc P6: l MN PK M 2 P64 m u C: E�. 40. L. M 2 P64 .:,,:.fit ,: 7 OR J H r! 4- Q% LL 0 • • U c • • • t • 1 • n a� L iz a.i v N L U 0 L Co c C6 N f0 c O .N c CL c 0 fB �U 0 N Q c V) _N c 0 U a) c fLi c 0 f� U 0 Ln N Q 0 ¢-+ f0 c 0 f6 L V) N EZ Q c 0 �N 0 c 0 .N c 0 c 0 CL 0 U 0 N L 0 Q 0 m Ln m 0 a) c cc G E L- 0 V) Q1 i dD 4J L 4- 0 L 0 L d-j N 0 N Ln 4- fD U c (0 N 0 72 L. U N 0 z 4-J c L cu E .n 0 E ftS 0 cn E f0 L U U c 0 c Q1 Q (g c [O c m N 0 w C 0 N .5 0 Q fp L U U f6 _0 �N c 0 Q fII 0 to i N f0 co c 0 4{ �U 0 N Q 4- 0 0 LL Q� 3 f� m ..c 4-J c .c .3 Qi c 4- Q� N N 40+ f0 L [0 Q Q) N 0 0 L 0 .p-.+ L� a� U 0 .0 C PO Firefighter Participation, Performance, and Training Summary Name /Rank: Joe Firefighter Hire Date 01/01/06 Years of Service as of: 1/112014 8.00 Section If - Job Performance Data 2009.2013 Total Year Calls Resp. % Rank Truck -1. Rank O.I.C. Rank Maint. Rank Training In 20 2009 550 246 45% 16 15% 11 1 n/a 27.5 7 25 100% .010 b77 262 4594 17 2244 8 1 n/a 27.6 10 27 108:4 2011 615 247 4D°I° 22 14% 15 0 n/a 25.5 10 28 112% 2012 554 202 36% 23 16% 12 3 n/a 23.25 12 26 104% 2013 558 196 35% 30 17% 14 17 9 27 9 26 173% 2013 Dept. Ave, 533 225 43% 20 13% 22 31 7 24 20 23 of 23 103% 3 year average 576 215 37% 25 16% 14 7 3 25 10 27 110% 3 Yr. Dept. Ave. 557 242 44% 21 13•k 21 34 7 25 18 j 24 of 24 99'/, YM Totals 1 3 1 1 5 F_ 1 3 1 9.00 1 1 14 1 15,38% 1 2 1 1 Comments: 'OO' P6t West Hennepin (or bakes Area) Fire Group October 10, 2013 Agenda I. General Discussion • Fire Department Partnerships or Consolidation Feasibility • Fire Chief and Individual Department List of Objectives • Concepts and Ideas — Brainstorming • Political and City Officials support and /or role II. Opportunities and Challenges • Advantages or Opportunities • Disadvantages, Problems, Obstacles, and Challenges III. Planning and Implementation • Strategic Planning — Short Term and Long Term • Financial Considerations and Budgets • Implementation Plan and Timing IV. Problems and Concerns • Individual Fire Departments maintaining identity • Organizational Structure • Staffing Plan (of fire stations) • Pension Plan disparity or gaps • Other Issues P6' Advantages: • Better overall strategic planning for future with longer term contracts. • Restructuring administration for effectiveness and efficiency • Financial consolidation efficiency and more consistency. • Improved service through efficient resources utilization. • Much improved fire operations, through strategic planning, and staffing. • Improved Capital Equipment and Fire Apparatus Capital planning. • Better, more consistent firefighter training. • Standardization of documentation for all fire departments • Utilization of existing facilities, apparatus, equipment, staff Challenges: • Allocation of financial revenue appropriately. • Current wage and Pension Plan inconsistencies. • Proper allocation and placement of fire apparatus and equipment. • Maintaining fire department identity and ownership. • Establishment of appropriate / acceptable organizational structure. Other Issues: Future fire station study and placement. Recruitment and allocation of firefighter personnel for stations. Long term budget forecasting and cost control Other assumptions or considerations as part of the hire District or Partnership solution: • The implementation time frame or start up date will be January xx, 20xx. • Full implementation will be a work in progress and will be an ongoing continuous improvement project. • One, all inclusive Fire Department District Budget will be submitted which will contain all aspects of the budget: Administration, Operations, Pension Plan funding, Facilities, Capital Equipment and Apparatus Plan, a combined Staffing Plan. • The overall Fire Protection costs will likely not be reduced, however core services will continue to improve, and certainly be more efficient and effective long term. • A 10 year contract agreement will be in place. • Fire Station Facilities: utilize the existing fire station facilities • Expansion and additional fire stations will be necessary in the future; stations will be built and operated by the Fire District. -87- 2 P68 • Minimal Capital Apparatus or Equipment purchases required (short term) as we use existing apparatus and deploy or locate as necessary. • Full time staff needs will be evaluated, and more full staff will be budgeted. • The staffing models and fire department response protocols will change, utilizing more time conscious efficient methods (not a cost savings) such as Duty Officer, Duty Crews, and All Call paging concepts. Firefighter numbers will remain similar to current staffing levels, may fluctuate + or — 10 % depending on staffing models. • Computer Aided Dispatch "CAD Zones" will be evaluated, redrawn, and reconfigured as necessary to improve response times and efficiency. • Primary Protection and Geographical Fire Areas (which fire department "Primarily" serves the geographic area) will be redrawn and department response by CAD Event Types will be evaluated and reconfigured. • Automatic Mutual Aid will be more prevalent and expanded. • All OSHA Laws and relevant NFPA Standards will be adhered to meet firefighter safety, response times, and service quality objectives Mound Fire Chief Greg Pederson Updated October 10, ?013 P69 S45 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD JERSEY CITY, N1 07310 -1686 TEL 1 -800- 444 -4554 Pre - survey Information Request For Fire Department Features for Fire Suppression ISO is the principal provider of underwriting, rating, and statistical information to the insurance industry in the United States. An important part of the information ISO provides to insurers is a community's Public Protection Classification (PPCTM) number. The PPC program evaluates community fire suppression delivery systems according to a uniform set of criteria, incorporating nationally recognized standards developed by the National Fire Protection Association. As part of the PPC program, ISO conducts evaluations for fire suppression. This section of the review constitutes 50% of the available PPC score for the community. Following is a twelve -page questionnaire. Please record as much of the information as possible on these forms. For questions that do not apply to your community, please indicate "does not apply" or "DNA." I will be meeting with you on 15 -Apr at 09:00 hrs with the location being: Mound Fire Department If you have any questions concerning this questionnaire, please contact me. My phone number is cell:(763)360 -4717, office:(651)213 -3104 and my email address is sungericht @iso.com. Thank you, Steve Ungericht, Field Representative Insurance Services Office, Inc. i P70 ISO's Public Protection Classification (PPCTn) Service gauges the fire protection capability of the local fire department to respond to structure fires In a property in which your company has a financial stake. ISO collects information on a community's public fire protection and analyzes the data using our Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS). We then assign a Public Protection Classification from i to 10. Class 1 represents the best public protection, and Class 10 Indicates no recognized protection. By classifying a community's ability to suppress fires, ISO provides crucial Information for understanding the entire landscape of risk associated with a specific property. We have extensive Information on more than 47,000 fire - response jurisdictions. Choose the Information medium that best suits your needs. Public Protection Classifications are available in various electronic formats, and through LOCATION®,. ISO's risk - assessment tool. ISO releases the latest updates to PPC listings through the Community Mitigation Classification (CIVIC) Modified Jurisdictions pages. For more information on ISO's public - protectlon ratings, read ISO's PPC Program: Helping to Build Effective Fire- Protection Services and Effective Fire Protection: A National Concern. •1 P71 CO I I r► • i' N M f -92- 4 i • i I t �. f` q • • f - \ \� Cd , / t2 \Q \\ \_ _- _ \\ \G � - y � -93- � �\ � � � .. � « i m \ \// /7` f \ \ \-ch 0) 00 /. /o LM ƒ\ � : Lei \ \ \�» / / / / / / \r4 f%\% ƒ9 %@ ± / i0 \0a// 0 Via: : \\ ro ; \ / / \k7 /////~ / % @$ ���Z\ 0 * ¥m *fm 6 l \\ .. . : ti � a m W ct I Q) 0 r14 Ln Ln C4 C�4 M C-4 C6 nrommig.2 im U V 0 0- -95- Poll') 4..� I I z &it CL -0 0 0 0 t),O E: Ln co -2 I z &it od ril .4 4 ® ® 00 %D v -97- i 9 ►M i d-� to Q :T • L U u cd � CL 0) 0 E O O O w = L m 4J ® ® 00 %D v -97- i 9 ►M i d-� to Q :T • C'q ; to q o �aQ t 4-1 a q yp�p lFd Cd Cd 7 .• ., Ln O N m U m W fU t C a) U C C O O C6 N V) L Y- (V U) CY) O N ® ® ° ��ppqq W �M V to y � E d � Cd L L b0 0 N i O O L m U m W fU t C a) U C C O O C6 N V) L Y- (V U) CY) O N 4-j ct 0.1.4 0 CN Cd P'li Cd Cd 4-J 4—) Cd M r:l 9 C) C) 0 0 0 0 Ln C) Ln N — — NOM el os % pf Apl VO% 990 a, O/X 75 c U) 70 C D 0 tB O ce) a -100- �4 -101- � L O O � � a = E N Ln cd O v 4J 'O � L � 4-1 u E ® N ® u ta0 cd c ® v& Ncc3 N � _ O O co u b 0 = u L N 0 C 4.J v' o Ln W N N N u> N cd 4-J t u p � o EF u . . . . . . -101- • -102- r• 9 • • s FA - -103- - / . a 2 : • . \ : \ # »� .: ■ °© c • • ? ,« \ ? E \ j ■ • 2 • © \ ) . } } f a . j . \« 0 t . �^ 2 : . o c / - -103- a Q) i -104- a� N N L L S 0 0 N N 0 E E N 0 V N L i-+ r O1 CN C Nc N ?, L N tw M C (d b.0 E L W ..0 V) N 4J v- co M %D QS ® V- oll w r� co LO — N Ln M M — Ln N W L S- 4-1 U X W V) L V) Q LL N N td 771 C MC C N ® N O 0 Cd N N U FL a) td U 0 V � u U E N G N b.0 N D y C .0 Ct -104- a� N N L L S 0 0 N N 0 E E N 0 V N L i-+ r O1 (1) 0 0 ct bf) a 4-J W Ull -105- Date: April 4, 2014 To: City Mayor and City Council 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 -1668 HM: (9b2) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com From: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Subject: Finance /Clerk/Docks Annual Report to the Council My first responsibility is the supervision of staff. The current personnel that comprise the Finance and Administrative Services Department include: NAME TITLE STARTING DATE Collette Roberts Accounting Clerk/Payroll /Accounts Payable 03 -12 -99 Amy Stark Public Works Admin Asst/Accounting Clerk 04 -08 -13 Noah Iverson Accountant 03 -19 -14 Ron Stanchfield Part-Time Docks Inspector 05 -14 -09 Catherine Pausche Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer 09 -01 -06 The following pages summarize the 2013 accomplishments, efforts underway, and future goals and needs of the department. I appreciate the support of the City Manager and City Council in accomplishing these objectives. Department of Finance and Administration Accomplishments — Annual Levy and Budget: Submitted budget with (1.18 %) overall levy decrease. Analyzed utility rates and made recommendations. — Financial Audit: In May of 2013 we issued the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ended December 31, 2012. We received the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. — Financial Activity: We were able to meet, on a timely basis, all deadlines, including reporting, payroll, vendor payments, collection of funds, bank deposits, investment of idle funds, UB monthly billing and collection of payment, and all other financial activity. -106 - printed on recycled paper — Municipal Bond sales: Issued $6.27M in bonds for 2013 projects and $2.495M in refunding bonds /new money to save on interest without lengthening the term. Maintained our AA/Stable rating from Standard and Poors. — Union Negotiations: Helped to achieve a settlement for 2013 & 2014 as of August 2013 with a settlement of $0.50 per hour wage increase in 2013 and $0.50 per hour wage increase in 2014 and a $25 increase per year to the dependent coverage insurance contribution. — Recycling /Leaf Drop -off: We held a spring clean up day, and continued our contracts with NRG for leaf drop -off (flat rate) and Republic Waste Services for curbside recycling (flat rate). — Technology: Managed server maintenance /help desk support contract. Helped manage the upgrade of the fire department server. — Procurement/Contracts — renegotiated the 15 year Cable Franchise Agreement with Mediacom. — Housing: Managed Property Management Agreement with Common Bond Communities. Continue to manage capital grants, including Davis Bacon and other HUD reporting. Heavily involved with a contentious eviction action. Worked on a plan with Common Bond to increase occupancy rates and continue to explore disposition alternatives. — Benefits: Explored options with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) but stayed with current provider for 2014. — Shared Services — Continued to help manage the transition with the City of Orono Police Department. Helped coordinate lease agreements for Centennial Building and the move of City Hall to the former police space. — Reorganization — Created the Finance and Administrative Services Department in December of 2012 and assumed the Clerk and Dock Administration duties. Outsourced Utility Billing to a third party provider, filled the vacant Accounting Clerk position in April of 2013 and the Accountant position in February of 2014. Efforts underway, but not yet completed: — Public Housing — Consider options to relinquish ownership of building. — Union Negotiations: 2014 — 2015 contract negotiations with Public Works should begin this fall. — Bonding - Calculate Arbitrage Rebate on the 2009 bond Issues, assess opportunities to refinance bond issues at a lower rate, and determine long -term financing needs. Goals /needs of the department: — Policy Development — Continue to collaborate with Council and Management Team to come up with creative solutions to financial challenges. Ensure leaders are making informed decisions. — Audit -- Implement the audit requirement to document specific internal accounting controls and internal controls in general. Create /update employee manual to ensure adequate communication of key policies and procedures. -107- — Formalize the long -term financial management planning process to satisfy requirements of the investors and rating agencies as well as provide for responsible /managed growth. Analyze allocation methodologies to ensure proper accounting of costs of providing services and create accountability within the departments. —TIF -- Coordinate the assembly of TIF documentation and ensure compliance with State statutes and optimization of the use of funds. Work with Planning Department and City Attorney to ensure proper execution of our developer agreement — Training /Staff Development — Update job descriptions to reflect the change in responsibilities, continue cross - training and procedure documentation. Develop training plan and identify employee recognition opportunities. — Technology: Develop a long -term technology plan and establish priorities. Conduct individual PC audits /maintenance. Get employee website up and running with feeds from Gallagher Benefit Services. Expand use of Laserfiche throughout the organization, identify critical systems and IT infrastructure needs to further automate processes and provide for disaster recovery. — Procurement — Take advantage of cooperative purchasing ventures, review contracts with vendors, consultants and service providers to ensure we are optimizing our resources. Issue RFP for credit card services. City Clerk Accomplishments — Completed new assessment certifications to Hennepin County within the required timeframes — Maintained new website using GovOffice — Shadowed Hopkins City Clerk during the general election. — Attended Hennepin County elections training and managed the lease of new equipment. — Prepared minutes, resolutions and ordinance amendments as needed. Audited changes to official City Code. — Issued licenses and permits. — Introduced "Get to Know Your City Code" section of newsletter. —Completed move to new City Hall and purging of old records. Efforts underway, but not yet completed — Update the City Code for 2012 / 2013 / 2014 changes. — Administer the 2014 primary and general elections. — Recruit and train new election judges due to reduction in City staff. — Scanning and storage of city documents /records will always be an ongoing project due to its nature. There are still a few boxes of old City Manager files that need to be gone through and either purge or scan records. — Compile City Policy Manual that will incorporate all individual department policies into one manual m Goals /needs of the department — Reassess City Clerk duties to ensure they are performed on a timely and accurate basis and that synergies are achieved with other departments. — Formalize procedures, automate license application process where possible, develop task lists to ensure proper accountability. Dock Administration Accomplishments — Completed 2013 Dock Enrollment. — Proposed new City Code language for Lost Lake Slip assignment priorities, Lost Lake Slips fee changes to help support debt service on the dump bonds, and a one -time grace for non - abutters who missed the end of February deadline. — Completed dock inspections during season and handled all complaints /requests from dock program participants. — Completed the shoreline improvement study that will help set priorities for capital improvement/rip -rap projects. — Enacted changes to the dock and slip fees, reduced payroll, both of which freed up funds for the capital improvement/rip -rap projects. Efforts underway, but not yet completed — Complete the 2014 Dock Enrollment. — Explore potential City Code language modifications to address boat lifts at multiple -slip sites. —City Manager leading effort to regulate business being conducted on public lands. Goals /needs of the department — Explore alternatives to the application process — multi -year renewals, charging to Utility Billing — Reassess LMCD license fees, which is the top error on applications. — Explore alternatives for marking dock sites, need for setbacks, and /or relief of congestion. KO j� t � Community Development Department Annual Report to City Council for 2013 On behalf of the Community Development Department, I am pleased to present the 2013 Annual Report to the City Council for review and consideration. STAFF. The Department is staffed by Administrative Assistant Jill Norlander who was hired in February 2001. My tenure as Community Development Director for the City of Mound began in July 2001. The Planning and Building Department is also provided technical support from Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson who began working for the City of Mound in May 2005. CONSULTANT SERVICES. The Building Official position was eliminated in January 2005 and full -time building inspection services were assumed by MnSpect on a contract basis. The current contract, approved on December 11, 2012 is in effect until December 31, 2015. Scott Qualle is the designated Building Official. Rita Trapp of HKGi has been providing consultant planning services to the City of Mound since June 2005. BUILDING PERMIT SUMMARY Building Permit Information 2005 -2013. Year Building Permits Valuation 2013 199 10,410,249 2012 311 $8,162,212 2011 411 $8,053,468 2010 535 $7,264,815 2009 302 $4,748,360 2008 269 $ 5,223,741 2007 258 $10,855,936 2006 329 $17,709,317 2005 385 $14,148,260 -110- CODE ENFORCEMENT. The Community Development Department receives assistance and support from Staff and other Departments with regard to code violations, complaints and nuisance related issues. The majority of complaint related issues (i.e. exterior storage, inoperative vehicles, etc.) are handled by Community Service Officer Mike Wocken. Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson assists on grading/drainage and other related matters. The cooperation we receive from Staff is exemplary and we are specifically appreciative of the efforts of Kandis Hanson, Mike Wocken and Ray Hanson. PLANNING COMMISSION CASES. A summary of the planning cases from 2005 -2013 is provided below: 2013 (35) 2012 (25) 2011 (14) 2010 (13) 2009 (15) 2008 (17) 2007 (32) 2006 (51) 2005 (84) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. Provided below is a list of projects which were undertaken and /or completed by the Community Development Department. It is important to note that many of of these projects were done in cooperation and with assistance from other Departments /Consultants. • Temporary approvals for Mound Farmers' Market and More and New Morning Church • CUP approvals for Johnny's Garden Center, Bay Rentals, Centennial Building, City and Fire Administration Building and MCES wastewater treatment facility • Subdivision, land use and development agreement approvals for The Landings on Lost Lake and Woodlyn Ridge • Completion of downtown Mound marketing study and presentation at Council workshop and presentation at Mound Magic III held at Al and Alma's Supper Club -111- • Review and processing of request from Hennepin County for review of Tax Forfeit list 1624 - C/NC for (3) parcels in Mound • Building permit approvals for Dakota Junction restaurant /bistro and Westonka Animal Clinic • Research and review of Mound parking regulations and approval of zoning ordinance amendments (adopted January 2014) • Preparation of urban agriculture report for backyard chicken and bees • Upcoming: - Expansion permit regulations review - Pawn shop regulations - Exotic animals Updated marketing materials SUMMARY. On behalf of the Community Development Department, I would like to express my sincere thanks to the City Council and Planning Commission for their dedication and commitment to our department and to the City of Mound. The countless hours that are spent on land use and permitting issues do not go unnoticed. Additionally, I would like to thank the other City departments and consulting staff that have provided assistance and staff support throughout the year. It is an honor and a privilege to work with such dedicated individuals who assist in every area of my job and also make it fun to come to work every day. As always, we welcome any suggestions or comments that the City Council may have. You can be assured that we will continue our endeavors to improve efficiency and customer service in our Department. -112- �, . � i . � -113- I V.11 all lf�[ITM i7INliVYi1I I. Parks Division 2013 Annual Report ............ ............................... 1 - 3 II. Public Works 2013 Annual Report ............ ............................... 4 - 6 III. Public Works Department 2013 Capital Improvements .................. 7 - 8 IV. Public Works Department Work Plan / Initiatives ......................... 9-10 -114- Parks Division 2013 Annual Report The Parks Division is responsible for managing the 33 parks in the city, the maintenance and management of the Municipal Cemetery, aspects of the Municipal Docks Program, Municipal Buildings, Transit Center Parking Deck, Mound Bay Park Depot, and the Veterans Memorial Plaza. In addition, the division is responsible of the inspection of weeds on unkempt grounds, and hazardous tree removal from city property. The division is also responsible for the preventive maintenance of its equipment. Assisting in this effort are three full -time parks maintenance employees along with seasonal maintenance employees. The Parks, Open & Space Commission (POSC) function as an advisory board for bringing recommendations to the City Council regarding relevant issues. General Comments During 2013, the Parks Division was involved mainly with maintaining current playground equipment and lands. In past years, we have seen improvements to Avalon, Belmont, Chester, Dundee, Langdon, Philbrook, Seton, Swenson, Three Points, Tyrone Park, Alwin Park, Belmont, Weiland, Scherven and Seton Park. Along with development, maintenance for the parks must be planned. Maintenance and upkeep of the parks is a major ingredient for their success. Regular mowing, leaf removal, litter pick up and periodic repairs are aspects of the parks and These improvements and maintenance provide a a commitment to the community. generally take up the most hours over the year. visual confirmation that the City of Mound has The downtown Streetscape and Greenway completed in 2006 has had the routine maintenance turned over to the Parks Division. It is staff's belief that this amenity is high priority for maintenance scheduling. The Streetscape and Greenway are visited daily to provide a well groomed entrance into the main business area of Mound. Parks maintenance staff have been at the Island Park Garage since 1989. Following a 1987 engineering improvement recommendation report, a new roof was installed in 1990, and electrical updates, new garage doors and exterior painting were completed in 1991. Major foundation repairs and driveway reconstruction were completed in 2012. A facilities study conducted in 2002 noted that the Park Maintenance Facility continues to need improvements. Staff is looking forward to the consideration of moving the Parks Maintenance Division to a joint complex with the Public Works Division. -115- Hazardous Tree Removal As of December 31, 2013, the yearly total of hazardous tree removals from City property was 42 trees removed, 11 stumps chipped, 21 trees trimmed that posed a hazard, and 12 sites had brush removed. From private property, 5 trees were marked for owner removal due to hazardous conditions. Of the 5 trees 1 was contracted for removal by the City as Forced Removal. Diseased and hazardous trees are removed on a complaint basis. When a complaint is received, an inspection of the tree is done to determine the need for removal and the ownership. City owned trees are removed by a contractor as soon as possible, while private trees are removed in accordance with City Ordinances. Private trees not removed in the grace period allowed, are force removed. The cost of a force removed tree is billed to the property owner. If this bill is not paid, it is then assessed to their property taxes for the following year. Weed Notices In 2013 approximately 78 weed notices were issued by the Community Service Officer for unkempt grounds. Of which 69 owners' complied with the work requirement. The 9 non- compliance properties had the work performed by a City hired contractor. The cost incurred by the City is on these non - complying properties are billed to the owner. If the owner does not pay, the cost is assessed to their property taxes. Depot and Island Park Facilities No improvements have been made at the Depot building since 1998 when interior carpeting, painting, cabinets, fans and lighting were completed. In 2003, a new curb and asphalt parking lot was completed. In 2011 a new shingle roof was installed. The facility is currently being utilized for local organizational meetings and private parties. User response has been very positive. Improvements will reinforce the Depot as an asset to our City. Depot Rental Rates $350 check/$50 cash Damage and Clean-up Deposit $250 /per day Non -Mound Residents $125 /per day Mound Resident $25.00 /per day Mound Westonka Community Civic and Non -Profit Charitable Organizations Fees were waived on 22 groups, resident payments totaled $5,000.00, non - resident payments totaled $250.00, Civic and Non -Profit payments totaled $300.00. The total rental payments received was $5550.00. The Island Park building has had the utilities turned off. This facility is currently being used as a storage area for Parks and Docks storage. Only minimum maintenance is performed on this building. Vandalism has led to the windows being boarded up rather than being replaced. Staff has concerns of the building posing a hazard and obtained estimates for it removal. -116- 2 City Hall Maintenance / Janitorial The Parks Division is responsible for the seasonal lawn care and snow removal at City Hall. It is also responsible year -round for the heating and air conditioning inside City Hall and the Centennial Building. Parks staff is also responsible, within their capabilities, for the repairs to plumbing, heating and related equipment. Major repairs for the heating and air conditioning systems and cleaning services are contracted out through the direction of the Parks Division. Janitorial duties are contracted to an outside vendor. Parks & Open Space Commission The Parks & Open Space Commission is made up of 5 members, including a City Council Representative for the commission. Their responsibilities include: PARKS: • Parks /wetlands and related concerns • Cemetery operation • Island Park Hall and Depot building repairs • Nature Conservation areas • Swimming beaches • Depot rental and use • Budget preparation • Park Improvements • Adopt A Green Space Issues discussed and reviewed in 2013: • Park Cleanup Special Events • Dispersal of funds for playground structure purchase • Dog Park • Adopt a Park Program Equipment Maintenance and Replacement Preventive and unplanned maintenance of all related equipment is the daily responsibility of the Parks & Docks Division. The Parks Division follows the equipment replacement schedule which allows for the replacement of equipment on a planned schedule based on its age and serviceability. This schedule will allow the Parks & Docks Division to operate efficiently and provide safety for the general public and the parks crew. -117- 3 Public Works Department 2013 Annual Report 2013 At A Glance The 2013 street improvement project will be completed this spring with the placement of the final wearing course of bituminous. A number of new watermain gate valves were installed along with new watermain. One new lift station on Three Points Blvd. at Glen Elyn was also put into service. The sewer department worked with a Michels Contracting on our Inflow / Infiltration (I / I) reduction project. These consisted of repair of bad connections and complete lining of over 2600 feet of sewer pipe in various locations. Personnel There are 9 full time employees in the Public Works Departments. The Superintendent responsibilities include evaluation of employees, scheduling of work, delegation of projects and tasks, budget preparation, reports, determination of emergency call -outs, construction meetings, project inspections, purchasing of materials and equipment, answering questions, resolving complaints, etc. The Public Works Director is in charge of both Public Works and Parks. There is one full -time Administrative Assistant for both Public Works and Parks. The MPCA requires that the City have at least one full -time employee with Class C certification in Water Supply Operations and one full -time employee with Class SD certification in Wastewater treatment. Certificates are renewed every three years. All employees receive continuous training and education at various schools, seminars and conferences. The city contracts with Safe - Assure to keep us in compliance with OSHA standards and regulations. This training is done once a month. Along with this training, the city has a Risk Management inspection conducted by the LMCIT every year. Street/ Fleet Division The primary function of the Street Department is to maintain and repair the city streets and storm sewers. This includes plowing and snow removal, sanding, sweeping, clearing street right -of- ways of brush and tree limbs, bituminous patching, street preparation for seal coating, repair and maintenance of storm sewer catch basins, street sign repair and installation, curb and sidewalk repair, street lighting, equipment maintenance, installation and repair of banners and Christmas decorations, 12 parking lots, 27 cul -de -sacs, and 11 miles of sidewalks. During the winter months, it is the responsibility of the public works superintendent to determine when to plow and chemically treat the streets. The public works superintendent depends on the National Weather Service, local weather reports for information concerning weather systems moving in our direction and the Police Department to keep staff updated on road conditions. The public works -118- 4 superintendent will also periodically check the streets to determine if and when plowing and sanding may be needed or should begin. If at all possible, waiting until it stops snowing before plowing is preferred, but in icy conditions trucks will be sent out as soon as possible. Personnel from Streets, Sewer, Water and Parks are all called out to help with plowing. The city has 5 single axle trucks equipped with front plows, side wings, and sanders. In addition the city also has 5 four -wheel drive pickup trucks with plows, 3 1 -ton dumps with plows and sanders, 1 skid -steer and 2 snow machines for the 11 miles of sidewalks. This year we contracted snow removal in the Central Business District. Right -of -way repair and maintenance begins in early spring. This includes repair of watermain break patches, tree trimming, hanging summer banners, storm sewer cleaning, and street sweeping. Street sweeping is a major time consuming task. The City has 2 street sweepers, 2 sidewalk brooms, 2 trucks for hauling, and 1 tanker truck. Following a normal winter of sanding, street and sidewalk sweeping can take up to 3 to 4 weeks to complete. Once the sweeping is completed, we prepare for seal coating projects and other street repairs. Every year, the Street Department also attempts to repair as many sidewalks as possible. On average, the city replaces 10 sections of sidewalk and approximately 100 feet of curbing per year. The City storm sewer system is very large with 584 catch basins, which are cleaned once a year, and 84 sump catch basins, which are cleaned twice a year. While we still contract out the larger repairs, the storm water fees we now receive allow us to make yearly repairs and upgrades to the system. Utilities Division: The Utilities Division for the City of Mound consists of 3 areas; water distribution, sanitary sewer collection and storm sewer. The Utilities Division operates much like a business. Revenues are generated from the sale of water to over 3500 customers, from meter sales, and service charges. Salaries, benefits and operating expenses are paid from the revenues received. There are three budgets prepared for the Utilities Division; one for the Water Department, one for the Sanitary Sewer Department, and one for Storm Sewer Department. Line item expenses for each department does not vary much from year to year. The biggest percentage of the budget each year is for salaries, capital outlay, workers compensation, liability insurance and the Met Council sewer charges. Water The City has 3 wells, one of which is for emergency back -up only, one booster station, and a combined storage of 750,000 gallons in 2 towers and 265,000 in 1 standpipe. There are approximately 45 miles of watermain. The city is interconnected to the City of Spring Park at the Seton Bridge, and there are 2 interconnections with the City of Minnetrista. The Water Department is responsible for, among other things, meter readings, tower inspections and hydrant flushing. In 2013, we pumped 241,910,000 gallons of water. Every 5 -7 years, the City's water towers are inspected for the condition of the coating and anodes inside the towers. The water system is flushed out twice a year in order to reduce rust problems for our customers. -119- 5 Sewer The Sewer Department is responsible for maintaining 30 sewer lift stations, which are checked twice a week, and sewer line cleaning. They also perform pump repair, electrical repairs, pump removal and seal replacement. Major repairs are contracted out. The City's insurance company (LMCIT) has given us a timetable to complete the cleaning of 60 miles of sewer main in the City every 4 years, which means we would need to clean about 80,000 feet per year. Given our current manpower situation, we are only able to clean 40,000 to 50,000 feet per year. The current sewer system, installed in 1964, is in dire need of repair. In 2002, the city began televising the sanitary sewer system with a camera that enables us to detect problem areas. The 2003 Street Reconstruction Project enabled us to begin upgrading and repairing some of these areas. Upgrades and repairs are expected to continue with future Street Reconstruction and Sewer Lining Projects. Storm Sewer There are 545 stone catch basins, and approximately 93 outlets. The storm sewer system is being upgraded through the annual Street Reconstruction Project. The city started a program for the cleaning of the storm outlets in 2008. Scheduled maintenance for cleaning the lines begins in the spring of each year. -120- Public Works Department 2013 Capital Improvement Projects & Initiatives Street Reconstruction Proiect The 2013 Street improvement project on the East part of the Island is nearly completed with just the final wearing course of Asphalt and restoration to be completed. The City Council approved the 2014 street, utility and retaining wall improvement project is Three Points Blvd. and is anticipated to start construction in May. Retaining Wall Replacement Proiect The annual retaining wall replacement program provides for the reconstruction of retaining walls in various locations throughout the city determined to be in poor condition. This is the tenth year of the retaining wall replacement program. The retaining wall replacement project includes the removal of the existing walls and construction of decorative modular concrete block walls and site restoration. Seal Coat Program The seal coat program is proposed again this year will include the reconstructed streets in the Tonkawood area. Storm Sewer The City Engineer is reviewing locations that are in need of storm sewer improvements for 2014. Sanitary Lift Stations One sanitary sewer lift station was reconstructed in 2013 as part of the street reconstruction project and is located on Three Points Blvd. at Glen Elyn. New underground wet pits and control panels, pumps and SCADA were included in the project. The Council approved the reconstruction of one lift station in 2014 on Grandview Blvd. Inflow /Infiltration Study The City Engineer completed a study of the sanitary sewer lift stations and Inflow / Infiltration into the sewer lines. The results of this study will determine where the city needs to perform pipe lining in future years to come into compliance with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services directive to reduce the amount of I /I or pay surcharge penalties. It is anticipated the city will be able to avoid the surcharge by following the study recommendations. -121- 7 OTHER HIGHLIGHTS • Public Works staff is always researching the availability of grants for a variety of possible projects. Two grants were awarded to the city for sanitary sewer lining/ repairs (MCES) and one for storm water treatment (MCWD). • Staff annually updates the vehicle replacement program to better manage and forecast future vehicle and replacement needs and costs. • Staff annually reviews the long range infrastructure repair and replacement needs of the City's storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain. The results are incorporated into the City's capital improvement program. -122- Public Works Department Work Plan / Initiatives Capital Improvement Projects • Annual City Street Reconstruction / Rehabilitation • Annual Retaining Wall Replacement • Upgrade and expansion of the SCADA system • Inflow/ Infiltration Study— come into compliance with the MCES • Sanitary Lift Station Reconstruction • Annual Crack Seal and Seal Coat Program Surface Water Management • Annual Review of Surface Water Management Plan to insure compliance with administrative and maintenance requirements • Annual Review of NPDES lI permit and insure compliance • Annual Review of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and insure compliance • Review State and Federal laws and permit changes to insure City Policy and Ordinances are current • Review development plans to insure compliance with permit requirements • Annual Review of MCWD Rule Changes Parks • Annual update inventory of park structure maintenance needs • Evaluate equipment for possible replacement • Research funding sources for park improvements Streets • Sweep City a minimum of two times per year • Installation of new street signs throughout City and in Street Reconstruction Project Area. • Decrease use of sand with new snowplowing and sanding equipment • Repair sidewalks and trails as needed • Include utility upgrades and repairs on annual street reconstruction project Storm Sewer • Continue annual lake outfall cleaning and dredging • Continue annual catch basin cleaning • Maintain stormwater storage / ponding areas • Work with MCWD on storm water quality improvements • Construct storm sewer improvements / repairs as needed • Include upgrades and repairs on annual street reconstruction project -123- Sanitary Sewer • Continue televising and performing annual repairs as needed • In -pipe lining at locations with high inflow / infiltration problems • Reduce I / I as much as possible to avoid MCES surcharge • Annually implement SCADA monitoring and control system • Include upgrades and repairs on annual street reconstruction project • Coordinate with MCES to eliminate metering discrepancies • Upgrade /reconstruct lift stations • Coordinate as needed with proposed development Water • Implement SCADA system on new facilities • Annually update water system model with Bolton & Menk • Coordinate as needed with proposed development • Include reconstruction and repairs on annual street reconstruction project • Comply with Wellhead Protection Plan in accordance with State and Federal Regulations Administration • Annually update capital improvement program • Review Safety and Training needs of staff • Annually update Vehicle Replacement Program • Coordinate Public Works & Parks Maintenance Facility space needs • Coordinate Public Works review of grading and utility plans for development • Implement multi -year Crack Seal and Seal Coat Program • Upgrade office filing system and record retention • Annually update inventory of City's infrastructure and mapping. • Implement GIS street and utility mapping capabilities when completed by consultant. -124- 10 PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation; provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 22, 2014 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page 1. Open meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims 732 -753 *B. Approve minutes: Apr 8, 2014 regular meeting 754 -760 Apr 15, 2014 special meeting workshop 761 *C. Approve the following permits for Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church — The Blast: Sat, May 17, 2014, with fees paid 1. Public Dance /Live Music Permit 762 2. Banner and Sign Permit 763 -765 *D. Approve the following permits for the 2014 Mound Fire Relief Association 766 -767 Annual Fish Fry: June 7, 2014, with fees waived 1. Temporary Sign and Banner Permit 768A -768B 2. Public Dance /Live Music Permit 769 3. 1 -4 Day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License 770 *E. Approve Public Gathering Permit for Minnetonka Classic Bass Club Contest 771 at Surfside Beach and Park: Saturday, May 31, with fee and damage deposit paid *F. Parks & Open Space Commission recommendation on new playscape location 772 *G. Set Special Meeting Workshop for the purpose of receiving a Concept Plan for Assisted Living Facility by Trident Development: May 20, 2014, 7:00 PM 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker) o. Mayor Harms, requesting action on Resolution Proclaiming "WeCAB Week in Mound " - 773 -774 May 4 -10, 2014 PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 7. Mayor Hanus, requesting action on a Resolution Authorizing a Feasibility Study for 775 -813 a Lake Minnetonka Scenic By -Way Concept 8. Dan Faulkner, consulting engineer with Bolton & Menk, requesting 814 -816 discussion/action on: A. Resolution Rejecting Bid for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall 817 Improvement Project– Three Points Boulevard B. Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Bid Documents for and Ordering 818 Advertisement for Bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project – East Three Points Boulevard C. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Bid Documents and Ordering 819 Advertisement for Bids for the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvement Project, Lost Lake Bridge to Wilshire Boulevard D. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Bid Documents and Ordering — 820 821` Advertisement for Bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project – West Three Points Boulevard Utility Improvements E. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Bid Documents and Ordering — 924820 - <' Advertisement for Bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project– West Three Points Boulevard Street and Retaining Wall Improvements 9. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting action on Resolution 822 -825 Denying Board of Appeals Zoning Adjustment and Appeals Request from Allison Sisk Regarding the Keeping of Alpacas at 6221 Westedge Boulevard 10. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussion/action 826 -832 on the Urban Agriculture Study Related to the Keeping of Chickens 11. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussion/action 833 -846 authorizing Submittal of comment letter to the Metropolitan Council regarding the Thrive MMSP 2040 Draft Local Forecasts for the City of Mound 12. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes C. Reports: MCWD 2013 Year in Review (See separate brochure) Harbor Wine & Spirits – March 2014 847 D. Correspondence: Resignation of Todd Peterson from Parks & Open 848 Space Commission 13. Adjourn Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More ^urrent meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site. anew. cityofrnozrnd. com. r �� • �r PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 7. Mayor Harms, requesting action on a Resolution Authorizing a Feasibility Study for 775 -813 a Lake Minnetonka Scenic By -Way Concept 8. Dan Faulkner, consulting engineer with Bolton & Menk, requesting 814 -816 discussion/action on: A. Resolution Rejecting Bid for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall 817 Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard B. Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Bid Documents for and Ordering 818 Advertisement for Bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — East Three Points Boulevard C. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Bid Documents and Ordering 819 Advertisement for Bids for the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvement Project, Lost Lake Bridge to Wilshire Boulevard D. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Bid Documents and Ordering 820 Advertisement for Bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — West Three Points Boulevard Utility Improvements E. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Bid Documents and Ordering 821 Advertisement for Bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — West Three Points Boulevard and Retaining Wall Improvements 9. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting action on Resolution 822 -825 Denying Board of Appeals Zoning Adjustment and Appeals Request from Allison Sisk Regarding the Keeping of Alpacas at 6221 Westedge Boulevard 10. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussion/action 826 -832 on the Urban Agriculture Study Related to the Keeping of Chickens 11. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussion/action 833 -846 authorizing Submittal of comment letter to the Metropolitan Council regarding the Thrive MMSP 2040 Draft Local Forecasts for the City of Mound 12. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: C. Reports: MCWD 2013 Year in Review (See separate brochure) Harbor Wine & Spirits — March 2014 847 D. Correspondence: Resignation of Todd Peterson from Parks & Open 848 Space Commission 13. Adjourn Note: This is apreliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More ,errent meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: wiviv. citLaf nound cona. COUNCIL BRIEFING April 22, 2014 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Apr 22 — 6:55 -- HRA regular meeting Apr 22 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting — City Manager performance evaluation Apr 24 —1:45 & 7:00pm — State Wide Tornado Drill May 5 — Seasonal Hours begin Mar 1 — 1:00 — Special HRA/CC meeting May 7 — 5:00 — 7:00 — Hennepin County Assessors Open Book Meeting May 10 — 8:00 -3:00 -- Recycling Day May 13 — 6:55 -- HRA regular meeting May 13 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting May 17 — Mound Farmers' Market & More begins May 17 — Wheels for Meals — bike ride benefiting Meals on Wheels May 27 — 6:55 -- HRA regular meeting May 27 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting June 7 — 3:00 -12:00 — Mound Fire Department Fish Fry and Dance June 10 — 6:55 -- HRA regular meeting June 10 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting June 24 — 6:55 -- HRA regular meeting June 24 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting July 17 — 19 -- Spirit of the Lakes Festival (July 20- raindate for fireworks) Aug 2 — Tour de Tonka Aug 12 — Primary Election dug 12 — 8:00 -- HRA regular meeting — note change in time Aug 12 — after HRA — CC regular meeting Aug 26 — HRA regular meeting Aug 26 — CC regular meeting Oct 11 — Mound Farmers' Market & More Finale' Nov 2 — Daylight Saving Time ends Nov 12 — 6:30 -- HRA regular meeting — note change in day Nov 12 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting Nov 20 — 6:00 — Tree Lighting Ceremony City Hall Closings May 26 Memorial Day July 4 Independence Day Sept 1 Labor Day City Official's Absences May 14 -16 Kandis H conference 2014 04 i 1 1f 2014 042214H WS $ 107,559.22 2014 041714CTYAN $ 260.00 ',TOTAL CLAIMS 2 -732- Payments Cj t Y OF MOUND Current Period: April 2014 Batch Name BOLTMNK31414 User DollarAmt $107,175.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $107,175.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer i BOLTONAND MENX, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 402 - 43120 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0165251 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 401- 43101 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0165255 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 401 - 43127 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0165256 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0165257 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 401 -43112 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0165258 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0165251 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0165251 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 401- 43113 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0165261 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0165263 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 60249450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0165262 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0165273 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs MSA SYSTEM COORDINATION & UPDATE SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 2011 SW ISLAND STREET PROD PW11 -01 ENGINEER SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 Project PW1101 2011 HIGHLANDS STREET PROJ PW11 -02 ENGINEER SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 Project PW 1102 SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 2012 NORTH ISLAND STREET PROJ. PW 12- 01 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 Project PW 1201 GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS THRU MARCH 142014 WATER ENGINEERING SVCS THRU MARCH 142014 2013 CRACK & SEAL COAT PROD PW 13 -06 ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 Project PW1301 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW13- 03 ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 Project PW 1303 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW13- 06 ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 Project PW 1306 WATER SYSTEM MODELING ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 STORMWATER UTILITY -SWPPP UPDATE ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 Invoice 0165253 3/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23296 FRIEDRICHSON- FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD RD SKETCH PLAN REVIEW ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 Invoice 0165252 3131/2014 Cash Payment E 401- 43114 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0165265 3/3112014 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0165264 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0165266 3/31/2014 2014 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW14- 01 ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 Project PW 1401 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROV 2014 PROJ PW14 -04 ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014 Project PW1404 2014 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 14 -03 ENG SVC THRU MARCH 14 2014 -733- Project PW1403 04/17114 9:35 AM Page 1 $288.00 $1,067.50 $90.00 $504.00 $680.00 $2,728.50 $32.50 $31,932.50 $1,046.00 $147.00 $72.00 $252.00 $360.00 $53,992.00 $288.00 $5,492.00 Pre- Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $107,175.00 Total $107,175.00 734- CITY of MOUND 04/17/14 9:35 AM _ i Payments Page 2 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2014 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2014 BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN $8,203.00 REPLACE PROJ PW 14 -08 ENG SVC THRU MARCH 142014 Invoice 0165267 3/31/2014 Project PW1408 Transaction Date 4/14/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $107,175.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $3,088.50 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $87,762.00 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT $288.00 601 WATER FUND $8,307.50 602 SEWER FUND $6,685.00 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $1,044.00 $107,175.00 Pre- Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $107,175.00 Total $107,175.00 734- CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:32 AM - -'-'�• Page 1 ' Payments C TY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2014 Batch Name 042214CITY User Dollar Amt $201,732.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $201,732.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 42 ALERT -ALL CORPORATION Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -217 Fire Prevention Supplies JR FIREFIGHTER STICK ON BADGES W/ $165.00 MOUND FIRE DEPT IMPRINT Invoice 214030164 3/31/2014 PO 24296 Transaction Date 4117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total .... _ ... ,..:.. $165.00 ,.... Refer 1 ASPENEQUIPMENT Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts FREIGHT BALANCE DUE ON EQUIPMENT $22.36 Invoice 10130041 -2 3/5/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $22.36 Refer 32 BARTLEY SALES COMPANY, INCO _ Cash Payment E 60949750 -210 Operating Supplies ENTRANCE MAT- HWS $614.53 Invoice 106263 4/8/2014 Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $614.53 Refer 2 BENIEK PROPERTY SVCS INC. Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #1 CBD MARCH 2014 PLOWING $280.00 Invoice 142611 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #2 TRUE VALUE -RAMP- SIDEWALKS $305.00 MARCH 2014 PLOWING& SHOVELING Invoice 142611 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #3 COMMERCE BLVD MARCH 2014 $0.00 PLOWING Invoice 142611 3/31/2014 Transaction Date 2/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $585.00 27 BILL RASCHER MECHANICAL INC. _ _Refer Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance 5005 EDGEWATER, FROZEN WATER MAIN $816,18 REPAIR Invoice 3762 2/18/2014 Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $816.18 Refer 35 BOYER FORD TRUCKS _ Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts FUEL PUMP, GASKET COVER, WASHER $105.85 SEAL -PARKS Invoice 122379 3/25/2014 Transaction Date 4/14/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $105.85 Refer 34 BOYER TRUCKPARTS _ Cash Payment E602-49450 -221 Equipment Parts SEAL ASSEMBLY TRUCK #105 $22.49 Invoice 841175 4/8/2014 Transaction Date 4/14/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $22.49 Refer 43 CARBONE S PIZZA _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260431 Meeting Expense BLUECARD TRAINING LUNCH FIRE DEPT $61.40 Invoice 04222014 4/6/2014 Transaction Date 4/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $61.40 Refer 44 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS (FIRE) _ -735- CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411: 32 AM Page 2 Payments C "TY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair SPARK PLUG, PLATINUM PLUGS, SM $76.85 ENGINE PART, FUEL FILTERS Invoice 6974 - 223872 4/12/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair GEAR OIL $13.77 Invoice 6974 - 223875 4/12/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair CREDIT- RETURN SM ENGINE PART - $10.79 Invoice 6974 - 223874 4/12/2014 Transaction Date 4/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $79.83 Refer 33 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/IM _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts SWAY BAR LINK -'07 DODGE DAKOTA #107 $23.78 Invoice 6974 - 222501 3/19/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts OIL FILTERS #202 $9.52 Invoice 6974 - 222501 3/19/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -230 Shop Materials STARTING FLUID- SHOP $2.75 Invoice 6974 - 222685 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts AIR, FUEL & OIL FILTERS- ELGIN SWEEPER $8161 Invoice 6974 - 222966 3128/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials ABSORBENT MEDIUM 25 LB $34.92 Invoice 6974 - 223125 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts AUTO BATTERY #206 $86.99 '. Invoice 6974 - 223493 4/712014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts FILTER KITS, MERCON SP ATF OTS $119.00 Invoice 6974- 223493 4/7/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -221 Equipment Parts DIESEL CLEANER, WHEEL NUTS, TECHRON $56.89 20 OZ Invoice 6974- 223503 4M2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts BATTERY HOLD- DOWNS, BELT $9.28 Invoice 6974- 223518 4/7/2014 Transaction Date 4/1412013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $425.74 Refer 3 CENTERPOINT ENERGY(MINNEG Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14 $1,305.04 Invoice 04222014 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14 $1,305.03 Invoice 04222014 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14 $1,211.47 Invoice 04222014 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14 $1,430.50 Invoice 04222014 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14 $2,758.59 Invoice 04222014 4/9/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14 $671.32 Invoice 04222014 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14 DEPOT BLDG $342.56 Invoice 04222014 4/912014 Transaction Date 3/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,024.51 r Refer 49 D VINCIS NAVARRE, 1NCORPORAT Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -431 Meeting Expense BLUE CARD TRAINING LUNCH MTG FIRE $70.62 DEPT 4 -3 -14 Invoice 417882 4/3/2014 -736- Payments MY 5 Off' MOUND 04/17/14 11:32 AM Page 3 Invoice 04222014 4/16/2014 Transaction Date 4/17/2014 Refer 7 FULLERTON BUILDING CENTER Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 2183962 3/3/2014 Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -400 Repairs & Maintenance Invoice 2183962 3/312014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Refer 9 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006233171 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006233171 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006233171 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006233171 3131/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006244542 4/712014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006244542 4/7/2014 Cash Payment E 602-49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006244542 41712014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006244542 4/7/2014 Transaction Date 4/14/2013 Refer 8 G & K SERVICES _ Wells Fargo 10100 PARKS- CEDAR LUMBER 1 X 4,4 X 6 DOCK REPAIRS- CEDAR LUMBER 1 X 4 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $49.95 $226.30 $58.20 Total $284.50 UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 $25.21 UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 $38.18 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -31 -14 $178.38 Project 14 -3 UNIFORM SVC 4 -7 -14 $25.21 UNIFORM SVC 4 -7 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 4 -7 -14 $36.84 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -7 -14 $202.76 Project 14 -3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $557.88 737 Current Period: April 2014 Transaction Date 4/1712014 Wells Fargo 1.0100 Total $70.62 Refer 36 DELANO RENTAL INCORPORATED_ CasR Payment E 101- 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) TOWABLE 48" AERATOR $115.10 Invoice 3518 4/11/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) TOWABLE 48" AERATOR $115.10 Invoice 3518 4/11/2014 Transaction Date 4114/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $230.20 Refer 4 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials 9- 5 GAL YELLOW TRAFFIC PAINT, 23 5 $2,795.35 GALS WHITE HIGH BUILD DURABLE, 9 BAGS GLASS BEAD Invoice 802151309 3/17/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,795.35 Refer 5 EXECUTIVE TITLE INC.- GV _ Cash Payment R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT -5075 $611.61 WINDSOR RD- R. EMMER Invoice 04222014 4/1012014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $611.61 Refer 45 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE _ Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -433 Dues and Subscriptions FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE 2 YR 2014 & 2015 $49.95 SUBSCRIPTION Invoice 04222014 4/16/2014 Transaction Date 4/17/2014 Refer 7 FULLERTON BUILDING CENTER Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 2183962 3/3/2014 Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -400 Repairs & Maintenance Invoice 2183962 3/312014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Refer 9 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006233171 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006233171 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006233171 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006233171 3131/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006244542 4/712014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006244542 4/7/2014 Cash Payment E 602-49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006244542 41712014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006244542 4/7/2014 Transaction Date 4/14/2013 Refer 8 G & K SERVICES _ Wells Fargo 10100 PARKS- CEDAR LUMBER 1 X 4,4 X 6 DOCK REPAIRS- CEDAR LUMBER 1 X 4 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $49.95 $226.30 $58.20 Total $284.50 UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 $25.21 UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 $38.18 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -31 -14 $178.38 Project 14 -3 UNIFORM SVC 4 -7 -14 $25.21 UNIFORM SVC 4 -7 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 4 -7 -14 $36.84 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -7 -14 $202.76 Project 14 -3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $557.88 737 CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:32 AM Page 4 Payments CITY OF MOUN[D Current Period: April 2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 3 -31 -14 CENT BLDG $55.74 Invoice 1006233172 3/31/2014 Refer 11 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP I Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 4 -14 -14 CITY HALL $58.94 Invoice 1006255836 4/14/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23291 BOYUM- 2544COMMERCE -P 2544 COMMERCE CUP PLANNING SVCS Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 PARKS $47.67 Invoice 1006233173 3/31/2014 5913 FAIRFIELD RD SUBDIVISION PLANNING Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -31 -14 PARKS $75.02 Invoice 1006233173 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 4 -07 -14 LIQUOR STORE $69.98 Invoice 1006244535 417/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 4 -07 -14 PARKS $42.53 Invoice 1006244543 4/7/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -7 -14 PARKS $65.27 Invoice 1006244543 4/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 4 -14 -14 LIQUOR STORE $69.98 Invoice 1006255829 4/1412014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 4 -14 -14 $94.35 Invoice 1006255835 4/14/2014 Transaction Date 4/14/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $579.48 Refer 10 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP hth. Cash Payment E101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 97261 3131/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 97164 3/3/2014 Transaction Date 4/14/2014 Refer 47 HENNEPINCOUNTYINFORMATIO Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -418 Other Rentals Invoice 1000043845 4/11/2014 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -418 Other Rentals 3/4" PLATE WITH HOLES $40.00 1/8 X 3" FLAT 10' $10.85 Wells Fargo 10100 Total PW RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE - MARCH 2014 Project 14 -3 FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE - MARCH 2014 Invoice 1000043736 4/10/2014 Transaction Date 3/612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 11 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP I Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -300 Professional Srvs MISC PLANNING SVCS MARCH 2014 Invoice 007 - 001 -71 4/9/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23291 BOYUM- 2544COMMERCE -P 2544 COMMERCE CUP PLANNING SVCS MARCH 2014 Invoice 007- 005 -67 4/9/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23287 FRIEDRICHSEN5913FAIRFI 5913 FAIRFIELD RD SUBDIVISION PLANNING SVCS MARCH 2014 Invoice 007- 005 -67 4/9/2014 Transaction Date 4/1512014 Refer 13 INFRATECH Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 1400098 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice PR140164 2/28/2014 $50.85 $127.20 $1,285.26 $1,412.46 $1,099.75 $41.50 $41.50 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,182.75 YELLOW TRACTOR CONNECTOR CABLE $110.00 2013 STREET IMPROV PROJ CURED IN $30,952.50 PLACE PIPE REPAIRS PW 13 -06 _738_ Project PW1306 CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:32 AM - -- Page 5 Payments Refer 12 ISTATE TRUCK CENTER Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts Current Period: April 2014 Invoice C242297668 3125/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2013 STREET IMPROV PROJ CURED IN $36,342.50 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts PLACE PIPE REPAIRS PW 13 -06 Invoice C242297668 3/25/2014 Invoice 1400098 3/24/2014 Project PW1306 Refer 14 KLM ENGINEERING, INCORPORAT Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -400 Repairs & Maintenance JET VAC CLEAN SANITARY SEWER 3 -27 -14 $1,012.50 Invoice PR140190 3/27/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CONNECTOR CABLES $350.10 Invoice 1400110 3/26/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $68,767.60 Refer 12 ISTATE TRUCK CENTER Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts CASE ASSY MIRR CVX #313 Invoice C242297668 3125/2014 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts CASE ASSY MIRR CVX #313 Invoice 0242297668 3/25/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts CASE ASSY MIRR CVX #313 Invoice C242297668 3/25/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 14 KLM ENGINEERING, INCORPORAT Cash Payment G 101 -23283 VERIZON WIRELESS -TOW VERIZON ANTENNA MODIFICATION - CHATEAU TOWER #3 $89.65 $11.21 $11.21 Total $112.07 $1,500.00 Invoice 5153 3/28/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23283 VERIZON WIRELESS -TOW VERIZON ANTENNA MODIFICATION - HERCULES TOWER #8 Invoice 5154 3/28/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 17 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -361 General Liability Ins 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 46297 412/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 14 THRP 1 " -739- $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $2,139.30 $285.24 $770.15 $142.62 $313.77 $1,426.20 $85.57 $741.62 $4,706.46 Invoice 27152 Lefty OF MOUND 04/17/1411:32 AM Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $3,063.77 Page 6 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Payments 412/2014 i Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $6,911.15 CITY OF MOUND Invoice 27152 4/2/2014 Current Period: April 2014 Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $397.89 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -361 General Liability Ins 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $1,055.39 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Invoice 27152 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -361 General Liability Ins 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $5,704.81 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -361 General Liability Ins 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $487.48 Invoice 27152 412/2014 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Cash Payment Invoice 46297 4/212014 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Cash Payment E 285- 46388 -361 General Liability Ins 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $41.65 -740- 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -361 General Liability Ins 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $4,763.51 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -361 General Liability Ins 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $4,421.22 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -361 General Liability Ins 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $7,058.56 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -361 General Liability Ins 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $1,426.20 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 ' Invoice 46297 4/2/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35,569.75 Refer 16 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T _ Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $621.71 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $7,211.80 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $3,063.77 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 412/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $6,911.15 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $397.89 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $3,485.04 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $7,211.80 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $2,287.88 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 412/2014 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $65.65 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 4/2/2014 -740- CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:32 AM _.._- _._.�..\ Page 7 Payments Current Period: April 2014 Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $1168 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $621.71 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 4/212014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $746.05 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $497.37 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27152 4/2/2014 Transaction Date 4115/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $33,135.50 Refer 15 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -434 Conference & Training 2014 SAFETY & LOSS CONTROL WKSHP 4- $20.00 16 -14 Invoice 198640 4/8/2014 Project 14 -4 Transaction Date 4/1 512 01 4 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.00 Refer 18 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR - Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - COLOR $139.53 OVERAGE - 3/14/14 TO 4/13/14 Invoice 1729418 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - BAN $110.37 OVERAGE - 3/14114 TO 4/13/14 Invoice 1729418 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 PIN COPIER $9.28 OVERAGE CHG 3 -10 -14 TO 4 -9 -14 Invoice 1727734 4/1/2014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $259.18 6 MCVAY DEBRA _ _Refer Cash Payment R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT -2026 $194.25 BELAIRE LN- D. MCVAY Invoice 04222014 4/10/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $194.25 Refer 19 MEDIACOM _ Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 4 -16 -14 THRU 5- $93.40 15 -14 Invoice 04222014 4/6/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $93.40 Refer 48 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES COMP _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair GAS MONITOR REPAIRS- REPLACE SENSOR $375.00 Invoice 97381414 4/7/2014 PO 24298 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair GAS MONITOR REPAIRS- REPLACE SENSOR $375.00 Invoice 97381415 4/7/2014 PO 24298 Transaction Date 4/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $750.00 Refer 21 MINNESOTA DEPT PUBLIC SAFET _ Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -210 Operating Supplies 2014 MANDATORY VEHICLE INSPECTION $32.00 PROGRAM DECALS Invoice 04222014 4/7/2014 -741- CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:32 AM ---- Page 8 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32.00 Refer 20 MINNESOTA UNEMPLOYMENT INS_ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -140 Unemployment Comp UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 1ST QTR $510.48 2014 K. EZAKI Invoice 04222014 4/812014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -140 Unemployment Comp UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 1ST QTR $13.12 2014 A. HAGEN Invoice 04222014 4/8/2014 Cash Payment E 60249450 -140 Unemployment Comp UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 1ST QTR $292.80 2014 E. STRICKLAND Invoice 04222014 4/812014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $816.40 Refer 40 MINNESOTA WASTEWATER OPER_ Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training MWOA ANNUAL CONFERENCE- JULY 22 -25 $225.00 GRAND RAPIDS- R. HANSON Invoice 04222014 4/16/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training MWOA ANNUAL CONFERENCE- JULY 22 -25 $225.00 GRAND RAPIDS- S. KIVISTO Invoice 04222014 4/1612014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training MWOA ANNUAL CONFERENCE- JULY 22 -25 $225.00 GRAND RAPIDS- L. GIESE '? Invoice 04222014 4/16/2014 Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $675.00 Refer 22 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOC /A TIO _ Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib APRIL 2014 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION $12,250.00 CONTRIBUTION Invoice 04222014 4/1/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,250.00 Refer 23 NS /l MECHANICAL CONTRACTING, _ Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -400 Repairs & Maintenance REPLACE PILOT ASSEMBLY ON LEFT 31 $620.55 BOILER- CENT BLDG 3 -24 -14 Invoice W31221 4/10/2014 Transaction Date 1/912014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $620.55 Refer 24 0 SULLIVANS HOLIDAY Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -212 Motor Fuels FUEL STREET DEPT- TRUCK #202 $348.05 Invoice 03062014 3/6/2014 Cash Payment E101- 43100 -212 Motor Fuels FUEL STREET DEPT- TRUCK #202 $340,02 Invoice 03212014 3/21/2014 Cash Payment E 60149400 -212 Motor Fuels FUEL WATER DEPT- TRUCK #202 $410.00 Invoice 03272014 3/27/2014 Transaction Date 4/1512014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,098.07 Refer 25 OFFICE DEPOT _ Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -200 Office Supplies 50 PK DVD +R DISCS $8.63 Invoice 702885385001 3/28/2014 PO 24395 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -200 Office Supplies COPY PAPER -CITY HALL $139.36 Invoice 702885385001 3/28/2014 PO 24395 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $147.99 Refer 42 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUT IONS _ -742- ellt�y OF Nq-O ND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: April 2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -322 Postage MARCH 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE Invoice 140329 4/11/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute MARCH 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 140329 4111/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute MARCH 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 140329 4/11/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -322 Postage Invoice 140329 4/1112014 Transaction Date 2/19/2014 Refer 41 ORONO, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -450 Board of Prisoners MARCH 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE 04/17114 11:32 AM Page 9 $322.73 $1,773.63 $1,773.63 $322.74 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,192.73 HENNEP CTY JAIL CHARGES- PER DIEM $945.51 FEES MARCH 2014 Invoice 20140060 4/14/2014 Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $945.51 Refer 26 SIMPLEX GRINNELL Cash Payment E 285- 46388 -440 Other Contractual Servic PARKING DECK FIRE EXTINGUISHER, $830.55 SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST & INSPECTION 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15 Invoice 76889331 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 10145200 -440 Other Contractual Servic PARKS GARAGE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS TEST & INSPECT 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15 Invoice 76889091 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -440 Other Contractual Servic CITY HALL FIRE EXTINGUISHER, SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST & INSPECTION 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15 Invoice 76888878 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic FIRE DEPT FIRE EXTINGUISHER, SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM, KITCHEN HOOD TEST & INSPECTION 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15 Invoice 76888878 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic HWS FIRE EXTINGUISHER, SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST & INSPECTION 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15 Invoice 76888955 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41910440 Other Contractual Servic CENTENNIAL BLDG FIRE EXTINGUISHER, SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST & INSPECTION 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15 Invoice 76888952 313112014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic PUB WKS BLDG FIRE EXTINGUISHER, SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST & INSPECTION 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15 Invoice 76888988 3/31/2014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 4/14/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 28 STA -SAFE LOCKSMITHS COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance 2 CITY HALL DOORS REKEYED- 1 MORTICE CYLINDER KEYWAY, SIMPLEX TAILPIECE ASSEMBLY Invoice 00019808 Transaction Date Refer 3 3/3/2014 $80.00 $1,036.38 $1,036.37 $719.46 $1,187.65 $846.55 $5,736.96 $178.60 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $178.60 URTLE MAC AND KEY PRINTING _ .743- -744- CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:32 AM Page 10 ' Payments CffY OF PAC7UND Current Period: April 2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -200 Office Supplies 5,000 #10 IMPRINTED ENVELOPES $345.00 Invoice 20524 4/15/2014 PO 23935 Transaction Date 4116/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $345.00 Refer 46 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR COMP _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -402 Building Maintenance ADJ CLUTCH & LUBRICATE MAINT BAY $125.00 WEST GARAGE DOOR Invoice 413070 4/2/2014 Transaction Date 4/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $125.00 Refer 29 UHL COMPANY Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance SVC HEATING SYSTEM- VAV'S PROGRAM $1,634.15 ISSUES -CITY HALL & POLICE BOOKING ROOM 4 -04 -14 Invoice 26333 4/4/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance PREV MTCE 2ND QTR 2014 HEATING $531.25 SYSTEM - CITY HALL Invoice 26441 4/112014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -402 Building Maintenance PREV MTCE HEATING SYSTEM- 2ND QTR $531.25 2014- FIRE DEPT Invoice 26441 4/112014 Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,696.65 a. Refer 37 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS COR _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -224 Street Maint Materials #2 WINTER COLD MIX 3.10 TONS $387.50 Invoice 234578 3/26/2014 Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $387.50 Refer 30 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE_ Cash Payment E601-49400-400 Repairs & Maintenance LEAK LOCATE 3 -22 -14 @ 5233 BARTLETT $384.72 BLVD Invoice 4967 4/2/2014 Transaction Date 4/1612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $384.72 Refer 38 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC _ Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance REPAIR WATER SVC LEAK @ 5928 $2,162.50 HILLCREST 3 -26 -14 Invoice 3708 4/8/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance REPAIR CURB STOP @ 2443 COMMERCE $1.,946.25 BLVD 3 -31 -14 Invoice 3711 4/11/2014 Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,108.75 Refer 31 XCEL ENERGY _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -381 Electric Utilities 5341 MAYWOOD RD STREET LIGHTS -3 -3 TO $5,217.17 4 -2 -14 Invoice 515517516 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities CARLOW RD LIFT STATION ELECTRIC SVC $123.11 2 -26 THRU 3 -29 -14 Invoice 0514953980 4/3/2014 Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,340.28 -744- Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 285 MOUND HRA 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: April 2014 10100 Wells Fargo $52,505.79 $30,420.02 $943.57 $872.20 $16,932.94 $87,976.52 $12,015.31 $65.65 $201,732.00 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $201,732.00 Total $201,732.00 -745- 04/17/14 11:32 AM Page 11 ' a Batch Name 042214HWS Payments CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: April 2014 User Dollar Amt $107,559.22 Computer DollarAmt $107,559.22 $0.00 In Balance 04117/14 11:14 AM Page 1 Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE _ E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 125627 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $95.40 Invoice 463410510 4/15/2014 4/9/2014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 463410510 4/15/2014 Transaction Date 4/1512014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $96.40 Refer 2 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS, SUPPLIES $91.85 Invoice 89987900 41412014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $31.50 Invoice 89987900 4/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE- CORKSCREWS $9.04 Invoice 89987900 4/412014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $58.00 Invoice 89991500 419/2014 Cash Payment E609-49750-210 Operating Supplies BAGS, SUPPLIES $161.65 Invoice 90026300 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE, CORCKSCREW, WAITER, $75.99 GIFT BAGS Invoice 90026300 4/14/2014 Transaction Date 4/1512014 Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 42478000 4/412014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 42478000 4/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 42496600 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 42496600 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 42590600 4/1412014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Refer 4 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN Wells Fargo 10100 Total $428.03 LIQUOR FREIGHT LIQUOR FREIGHT LIQUOR Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 125627 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 125627 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 123988 4/212014 $2,896.85 $40.30 $4,531.59 $54.25 $8,309.15 Total $15,832.14 $63.85 $312.18 $619.15 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $995.18 Refer 5 CHANKASKA CREEK TASTING RO _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $151.20 Invoice 65225 4/8/2014 -746- CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:14 AM -- ------ Page 2 Payments CITY CAF` M,0UND Current Period: April 2014 Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $151.20 Refer 6 COCA COLA BOTTLING- MIDWEST _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $266.16 Invoice 0138120906 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $237.60 Invoice 0168051405 4/17/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $523.76 Refer 7 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $260.00 Invoice 19218 4/7/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $260.00 Refer 8 DAYDISTRIBUTING COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $0.00 Invoice 747810 4/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $160.10 Invoice 747809 4/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,837.31 Invoice 000346 4/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $177.65 Invoice 747064 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,586.60 Invoice 746754 4/8/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,761.66 Refer 9 EXCELSIOR BREWING COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $150.00 Invoice 3472 4/1/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R GLASSWARE $48.00 Invoice 3510 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $120.00 Invoice 3548 4/16/2014 Transaction Date 4/1512014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $318.00 Refer 10 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,149.00 Invoice 696447 4/9/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,149.00 11 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,129.30 Invoice 2199926 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $38.80 Invoice 2199928 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $15.50 Invoice 2199927 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,214.44 Invoice 2199879 4/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $16.00 Invoice 2199880 4/8/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Well s. Fa_747_ 10100 Total $6,414.04 CITY OF MOUND 04/17/14 11:14 AM _.._._..�\.\ Page 3 Payments CITY OF M,OUND Current Period: April 2014 Refer 12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1823292 419/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1823290 41912014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1823291 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1817730 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1817729 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1817728 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1823816 4/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT Invoice 614170 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1828896 4/1612014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1828897 4/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1828895 4/16/2014 Transaction Date 4/1512014 Wells Fargo Refer 13 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY _ $60.50 $1,543.73 $1,032.70 $26.65 $4,950.99 $3,192.59 $246.00 - $43.35 $2,304.95 $185.24 $4,310.85 10100 Total $17,810.85 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 3 -17 -14 Invoice 29178 3/17/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 3 -20 -14 Invoice 29194 3/20/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 3 -24 -14 Invoice 29203 3124/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 3 -27 -14 Invoice 29220 3/27/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 3 -31 -14 Invoice 29228 3/31/2014 $33.35 $272.95 $47.85 $195.65 $10.15 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $559.95 Refer 14 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 3 -10 -14 $61.00 Invoice 928022556 3/3012014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $61.00 Refer _ 15 PARLEY LAKE WINERY Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $219.00 Invoice 14029 4/9/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $219.00 Refer 16 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE QOMPA _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $491.00 Invoice 8442986 4/2/2014 -748- CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411 14 AM - - -- Page 4 Payments i "n€ E 4` CIE° Mi,?UNT,, Current Period: April 2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $11.25 Invoice 8442986 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $57.00 Invoice 8443030 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.25 Invoice 8443030 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $24.00 Invoice 8443336 4/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT -$1.25 Invoice 8443336 4/4/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $536.25 Refer 17 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $501.16 Invoice 8443510 417/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $8.75 Invoice 8443510 4/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,176.70 Invoice 8444516 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $16.25 Invoice 8444516 4/14/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,702.86 19 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ _Refer Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $569.70 Invoice 2583076 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR. $173.60 Invoice 2583075 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,207.46 Invoice 2590117 4/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $965.90 Invoice 2590118 4/16/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,916.66 Refer 18 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $540.25 Invoice 2586515 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $804.50 Invoice 2586516 419/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,344.75 Refer 20 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,286.00 Invoice 1147304 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $874.57 Invoice 1147303 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,244.00 Invoice 1149670 4/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $574.36 Invoice 1149671 4/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $993.85 Invoice 1151978 4/17/2014 _749_ CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:14 AM Page 5 Payments CITY OFIVIOUND Current Period: April 2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,840.00 Invoice 1151977 4/17/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,812.78 Refer 28 SOVERE /GNESTATE WINE _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $437.16 Invoice 306 4/13/2014 Transaction Date 4/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $437.16 Refer 22 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $104.05 Invoice 816648 4/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,242.20 Invoice 816641 4/1512014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $949.25 Invoice 816397 4/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $312.00 Invoice 816655 4/11/2014 Transaction Date 4/1512014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,607.50 Refer 21 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $947.15 ''.i. Invoice 814954 4/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $132.00 Invoice 815160 4/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $74.45 Invoice 00771789 4/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $6,342.85 Invoice 815220 4/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $104.05 Invoice 815221 4/8/2014 Transaction Date 4/1512014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,600.50 Refer 23 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $73.50 Invoice 0095878 4/312014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $4.00 Invoice 0095878 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $431.00 Invoice 0095877 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $8.00 Invoice 0095877 4/3/2014 Transaction Date 4/1512014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $516.50 Refer 29 WEBLEASE USA _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY WEBSITE SVC- HWS 4 -15 -14 TO 5- $99.00 14 -14 Invoice 64799 4115/2014 Transaction Date 4/17/2014 Wells Fargo Refer 24 WINE COMPANY N Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 357459 4/3/2014 -750- 10100 Total $99.00 $296.00 CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:14 AM - - -- Page 6 Payments CITY OF [0,01 IND Current Period: April 2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $6.30 Invoice 357459 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCH- MAGNUM 12PK $59.40 Invoice 357460 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.65 Invoice 357460 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $392.00 Invoice 358055 4/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $825 Invoice 358055 4/10/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $763.60 25 WINE MERCHANTS _ _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $718.50 Invoice 497501 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,377.70 Invoice 498431 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $18.00 Invoice 64790 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,320.00 Invoice 499447 4/16/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,398.20 Refer 26 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,154.15 Invoice 1090203375 412/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $171.00 Invoice 1090203376 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,049.35 Invoice 1090206812 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $21.50 Invoice 1090206813 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,132.40 Invoice 1090210043 4115/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $462.00 Invoice 1090210044 4/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $110.10 Invoice 1090210045 4/15/2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,100.50 Refer 27 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $650.00 Invoice 1080165154 4/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,204.77 Invoice 1080165143 4/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $48.00 Invoice 1080165155 4/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $212.00 Invoice 1080167778 4/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,027.98 Invoice 1080167779 4/16/2014 -751- Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $107,559.22 Total $107,559.22 -752- CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:14 AM - -- Page 7 r.... \ \ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2014 Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,14275 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $107,559.22 $107,559.22 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $107,559.22 Total $107,559.22 -752- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: April 2014 Batch Name 041714CTYMAN User DollarAmt $260.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $260.00 $0.00 In Balance 04/17/14 11:27 AM Page i Refer 2 FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC, HENNEPIN _ Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow HENNEPIN CTY SHERIFF'S $20.00 COMMUNICATION DIVISION 2014 DUES- HC FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC Invoice 04172014 4/14/2014 Transaction Date 4/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total - $20.00 Refer 1 MUNICI -PALS Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -434 Conference & Training SPRING WORKSHOP MAY 1 -J. NORLANDER $60.00 Invoice 04172014 4/8/2014 PO 24396 Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -434 Conference & Training SPRING WORKSHOP MAY 1 - C. ROBERTS $60.00 Invoice 04172014 4/8/2014 PO 24396 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -434 Conference & Training SPRING WORKSHOP MAY 1 -V. WEBER $60.00 Invoice 04172014 4/8/2014 PO 24396 Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -434 Conference & Training SPRING WORKSHOP MAY 2 - A. STARK $60.00 Invoice 04172014 4/8/2014 PO 24396 _ Transaction Date 4/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101GENERALFUND $180.00 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $80.00 $260.00 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $260.00 Total $260.00 -753- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 8, 2014 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, April 8, 2014, at 7:00 p.m, in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Kelli Gillispie and Ray Salazar Members absent: None Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Fin Dir /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Attorney Melissa Manderschied, Mike Wocken, Paul Boyum, Stephani Boyum, Cliff Simon, Curt Nelson, Allison Sisk, Nick Beilony Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda Gillispie requested the removal of item 4C as she wishes to discuss this item. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $219,301.95 B. Approve minutes of the March 25, 2014 regular meeting. C. Removed. D. Approve 1 -4 Day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church for The Blast Block Party on May 17, 2014 with fees paid. E. Approve Public Gathering Permit for the Red Ribbon Ride bike tour for July 20, 2014 with fees paid. -754- Mound City Council Minutes — April 8, 2014 F. Approve Pay Request No. 1 by Michels Corporation in the amount of $228,375.50 for work completed on the 2013 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project, City Project No. PW- 13 -06. G. ORDINANCE NO. 042014: ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 62 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO STREETS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES H. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -23: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY 1. Public Gathering Permit 2. Parade Permit 3. Public Dance /Live Music Permit 4. Seasonal Banner and Portable Sign Permit 5. 1 -4 Day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License Councilmember Gillispie asked for this item to be removed because she would like an explanation of why fees are waived for this event and not others. Mayor Hanus stated the fees have always been waived for this event and that the fees are waived because this is a city sanctioned event and the others are not. MOTION by Salazar, second by Hanus, to approve Spirit of the Lakes Festival Permits for July 17 -20, 2014 with fees waived. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda None were offered. C- Hanson stated that Spring Park has requested to contract for Community Service Officer services for nuisance abatement. Mayor Hanus asked CSO Mike Wocken how much time he thinks will be spent on Spring Park. Wocken stated the priority will be Mound and he has requested a top 10 list from Spring Park. He does not foresee that it will be a large commitment. There is one large issue that may take time initially, but that is an exception. Hanus noted there are blanks in the effective dates and Hanson said that will be completed by Spring Park. Attorney Manderschied noted it is subject to annual review by both parties. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the draft agreement between the cities of Spring Park and Mound regarding the provision of nuisance enforcement services. All voted in favor. Motion carried. N -755- Mound City Council Minutes —April 8, 2014 Sarah Smith stated an updated resolution has been included in the packet based on the discussion at the March 12, 2014 regular council meeting. Gesch referred to page 671, number 21, and asked if this is necessary for the CUP and isn't this language part of the liquor license code. Discussion ensued and it was determined to leave number 21 out. MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution, as amended striking number 21. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -24: RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) APPLICATION FROM STEPHANI BOYUM FOR A CLASS III LIQUOR SERVICE RESTAURANT, AS DEFINED BY CITY CODE SEC 129 -2 AT 2544 COMMERCE BOULEVARD TO BE CALLED CATTAILS KITCHEN N COCKTAILS — PC CASE NO. 13 -32 Q Smith stated a request for appeal using the Board of Adjustment and Appeals process is being used because of the potential impacts on residential zoning and land use. Smith stated this option is used when the applicant would like a staff decision reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. The appeal request was submitted on or around December 28, 2013 in response to a Staff ruling that alpacas are not allowed per Chapter 14 of the City Code. This is being treated as a Land Use appeal and the 60 day extension is applicable. Staff invoked the 60 day extension and the Council needs to make a decision by April 27, 2014. Smith stated the property consists of two parcels and is approximately 57,000 square feet and that the applicant has four male Alpacas that she considers pets. Smith provided relevant research and pointed out sections 14.2 and 14.9 of the Mound City Code that state that certain animals were grandfathered in as of 5/19160. Smith referenced applicable Minnesota State Statutes and pointed out that Section 178.03 is silent on alpacas. Smith stated that Mound City Code requires a commercial kennel license if there are more than 3 cats or dogs on any one premises. Staff does not find the keeping of alpacas permitted anywhere in the code in any of the districts. The Planning Commission agreed with Staff's finding. However, they recommended the Council consider a code change to allow this type of animal to be treated similar to a dog or cat in whatever district it is deemed appropriate. Smith stated as part of the appeal process the City Council must determine if Staff's review and evaluation was consistent with the City Code. Smith stated no resolution was prepared in advance and one will be brought back to the next meeting to meet the deadline. Smith stated animal control is managed by the CSO and he is present in the audience if there are questions. Hanus stated that Council needs to take two actions. First is to concur or object to Staffs assessment that alpacas are not allowed by the City Code. Secondly, the Council must decide on whether to approve or deny the appeal. Hanus stated he researched multiple hours on the internet and most information is about the business of fleece and to some extent meat. Hanus was trying to determine if alpacas are farm animals or a pet, which is more of an issue of use, and the area needed to raise them. Hanus -756- Mound City Council Minutes — April 8, 2014 said the information was inconsistent about how large the animals grow and how much area is required for pasture. Hanus couldn't find any area cities that allow them. Hanus referenced Minnesota State Statute Rule 6100.0500 which defined alpacas as a horse, which is expressly not allowed in the code. Hanus stated that alpacas are part of the llama family in state law and that alpacas were brought to the US in the 1980's so there is not a lot of information on them. Hanus referred to page 682 where the applicant claims they are considered exotic pets, but Hanus found no support for it. Hanus stated raccoons and bears could be considered exotic pets, but they are not necessarily domesticated. Hanus said the Council can't consider just this case, but must consider it city wide, and that it would impact many areas of the City Code including zoning, fencing, electrical, building, and setbacks. Hanus stated this is not a simple solution and felt the Planning Commission should have been more specific in the recommendations if they support allowing them (minimum lot size, setbacks, etc.). Ally Sisk, 6221 Westedge Boulevard, stated she never sold an alpaca and that they are all males. Hanus said he read that most that become pets are rejects from the breeders. Salazar stated the profit potential is strong from the wool. Salazar said caution must be used in classifying any mammal as a pet. Salazar stated Mound is not a farming community. Sisk stated some of the exotic pets Salazar mentioned are specifically prohibited in state law. Sisk stated they have a split rail cedar fence reinforced with invisible /clear wire netting. Hanus referenced Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding alpacas as pets. Hanus pointed out that they are herd animals and that multiple are required. Mound currently limits dogs and cats to three per household. Wegscheid said the Planning Commission was confused as to whether the limit was three dogs and three cats or a total of three of either. Hanus said it is the total of dogs /cats combined. Gesch asked the age. A year or younger and Sisk stated that they can live up to 15 - 20 years. Sisk stated they are considered to be fully grown and were chosen for petite size. They are 60 to 90 pounds each. Sisk stated her Great Dane weighs 160 pounds. Gillispie stated Wikipedia classified alpacas as a domesticated animal and that she finds it very confusing. Wegscheid said the state language defined livestock as animals intended for slaughter. Hanus clarified that the language was "horses intended for slaughter." Gesch said she does not feel the City Code addresses alpacas and that the applicant made a very good case that they should not be lumped in with horses. Gesch said she does not feel that Mound is a conducive place for alpacas. Hanus said there is no way to list every animal and that generalizations are necessary. Hanus asked the Council to first decide whether this is addressed in the code. Hanson stated Staff and the Planning Commission have decided that alpacas are not allowed per Sec 14 -2 because it is not listed, and in his opinion, because it is very much like a farm animal. Hanson offered two anecdotal examples. Two goats were kept on the City Manager's block and were confiscated because they are specifically not allowed. A year ago, someone wanted to raise a family of ducklings and Staff considered them like chickens and ruled that if it is not specifically mentioned, it is not allowed. Sisk asked if that needs to be stated in the City Code, otherwise why can't the public assume, if silent, it is allowed. The Mayor said if someone is in doubt, the City should be contacted. Hanson added the City relies heavily on past practice. -757- Mound City Council Minutes —April 8, 2014 Hanus said Mound is a suburb and the issue of urban agriculture is treated differently by different cities. Sisk stated the City of Orono and Minnetrista allow them, but Hanus said those cities are rural and farming communities. Gillispie said she does not consider Mound a suburb. Gillispie says it should be made clearer in the Code of what is allowed. Hanus asked the City Attorney what is typical for when the code is silent. Manderschied said since it is impossible to incorporate everything, there is typically language such as "except" or "or other animals ", but also that is why there is the Board of Appeals provision. Hanus poled the Council to see if they concur with Staff and Planning Commission that they are not allowed under the code. Salazar and Hanus said "yes ", Gillispie said "no," and Gesch and Wegscheid said they see the need for language that states if the code is silent, then assume it is not allowed. Hanus said that is not practical. Hanson said Staff uses the "same and similar' standard often since new terminology like "assisted living" hasn't been written specifically in the code. Salazar said it is a stretch to say that since they aren't listed then they are legal. Salazar said there was an obligation to make a call. Interpretation is up to the governing body and not the applicants. Sisk said she would have made the same arguments whether she bought them or not. Salazar said grandfathering them in opens up the floodgates of others seeking the same exception. Hanus stated many alpaca owners choose to board them at alpaca farms. Wegscheid said he agrees there was an obligation to ensure they were permitted. Gillispie stated that according to the Code.; domesticated animals should be; are - permitted. Hanus said cows are domesticated as well. Hanus said that it may need to be clarified, but that the Council needs to decide whether or not the City Code, as it is currently written, allows them. Gesch said the precedent does need to be considered. Hanus asked if it would help to decide if alpacas were more like dogs and cats or sheep and horses. Hanus said this is where the City Council is considered a quasi - judicial body and has to act as judges of the City Code. Hanus said it is up to the City Council to decide what group these animals should be considered in, permitted or not. Salazar said you need to look at it from a high level and that the code could not possibly cover every circumstance and judgments have to be made. Salazar agreed that the code language could be tightened up. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to concur with Staff and the Planning Commission that alpacas are not currently permitted under the City Code. Manderschied clarified that the Council should consider both Chapter 14 Animals and also the R1 zoning as it pertains to what districts should be considered. Hanus stated he is talking about any zone. The following voted in favor: Hanus, Salazar, and Wegscheid. The following voted against: Gillispie and Gesch. The following abstained: None. Motion carried. Mound City Council Minutes — April 8, 2014 Hanus said Mound is a suburb and the issue of urban agriculture is treated differently by different cities. Sisk stated the City of Orono and Minnetrista allow them, but Hanus said those cities are rural and farming communities. Gillispie said she does not consider Mound a suburb. Gillispie says it should be made clearer in the Code of what is allowed. Hanus asked the City Attorney what is typical for when the code is silent. Manderschied said since it is impossible to incorporate everything, there is typically language such as "except" or "or other animals ", but also that is why there is the Board of Appeals provision. Hanus poled the Council to see if they concur with Staff and Planning Commission that they are not allowed under the code. Salazar and Hanus said "yes ", Gillispie said "no," and Gesch and Wegscheid said they see the need for language that states if the code is silent, then assume it is not allowed. Hanus said that is not practical. Hanson said Staff uses the "same and similar' standard often since new terminology like "assisted living" hasn't been written specifically in the code. Salazar said it is a stretch to say that since they aren't listed then they are legal. Salazar said there was an obligation to make a call. Interpretation is up to the governing body and not the applicants. Sisk said she would have made the same arguments whether she bought them or not. Salazar said grandfathering them in opens up the floodgates of others seeking the same exception. Hanus stated many alpaca owners choose to board them at alpaca farms. Wegscheid said he agrees there was an obligation to ensure they were permitted. Gillispie stated domesticated animals should be permitted. Hanus said cows are domesticated as well. Hanus said that it may need to be clarified, but that the Council needs to decide whether or not the City Code, as it is currently written, allows them. Gesch said the precedent does need to be considered. Hanus asked if it would help to decide if alpacas were more like dogs and cats or sheep and horses. Hanus said this is where the City Council is considered a quasi - judicial body and has to act as judges of the City Code. Hanus said it is up to the City Council to decide what group these animals should be considered in, permitted or not. Salazar said you need to look at it from a high level and that the code could not possibly cover every circumstance and judgments have to be made. Salazar agreed that the code language could be tightened up. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to concur with Staff and the Planning Commission that alpacas are not currently permitted under the City Code. Manderschied clarified that the Council should consider both Chapter 14 Animals and also the R1 zoning as it pertains to what districts should be considered. Hanus stated he is talking about any zone. The following voted in favor: Hanus, Salazar, and Wegscheid. The following voted against: Gillispie and Gesch. The following abstained: None. Motion carried. -758- Mound City Council Minutes — April 8, 2014 MOTION by Hanus seconded by Salazar to reconsider the last motion so it could be restated. All voted in favor. Motion carried. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to direct staff to prepare a resolution denying the appeal on the issue of alpacas being permitted by the current City Code with the reasons being documented /drawn from the minutes. The following voted in favor: Hanus, Salazar, and Wegscheid. The following voted against: Gillispie and Gesch. The following abstained: none. Motion carried. Hanus stated the second action is to decide whether or not alpacas should be allowed. Hanus said a vast majority of sources referred to them as farm animals and that this is not judging whether or not they make a good or bad pet. It is a matter of if that activity is a good fit for Mound which is a fully built city with small lots. Hanson stated there is an alpaca business headquartered in Mound but they are boarded outside of the city. Wegscheid said he tried to compare to other pets, like the applicant's Great Dane. Wegscheid said these alpacas are smaller than some dogs and produce less waste. Wegscheid said he would be open to allowing them with restrictions. Gillispie asked the CSO to explain the complaints that have been received. CSO Mike Wocken said a realtor that had two properties for sale in the area called to express a concern. The realtor was made aware of it from a neighbor, so the "complaint" was somewhat second hand. Smith said she received a call on it as well. Gesch doesn't like the way the code is written but does not feel they should be allowed in Mound. Salazar does not believe they should be allowed. Salazar commented that allowing with restrictions makes for more work and enforcement issues. The alpacas must be sheered at least once a year so it would be difficult to discern whether it is for profit or not. Salazar said current neighbor's approval should not be considered since they can move and the approval can change. What happens when people with smaller lots want them or some other species. Gillispie said she agrees that the size of Mound lots and staff time on enforcement should be considered. Gillispie asked what the minimum recommended number should be kept since they are herd animals. Sisk said two is common and that she knows many people in Minnesota that have them as pets. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Hanus, to direct staff to amend the animal ordinance to specifically prohibit alpacas in the City of Mound. Discussion ensued to clarify what the motion was requiring. Hanus said the motion was specific as to what Staff should do, but that when it comes back, additional changes could be proposed on alpacas or other animals. The following voted in favor: Hanus, Gesch and Salazar. The following voted against: Wegscheid. The following abstained: Gillispie. Motion carried. 9. information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager: B. Minutes: Docks & Commons Commission — November 21, 2013 Parks & Open Spaces Commission — December 12, 2013 C. Reports: Hennepin County Assessor 2014 Mound Sales Book Hennepin County Sheriff's 2013 Annual Report D. Correspondence: Hennepin County on Seasonal /Non- Homestead Property Owners Note from Chief Farniok on marijuana forum -759- Mound City Council Minutes — April 8, 2014 10. Adjourn MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to adjourn at 9:01 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk r.1 Mayor Mark Hanus MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 15, 2014 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Tuesday, April 15, 2014, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Councilmembers Kelli Gillispie, Ray Salazar, Mark Wegscheid and Heidi Gesch Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson, Liquor Store Manager John Colotti, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, Fire Chief Greg Pederson, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Orono Police Chief Correy Farniok. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m. 2. Department Head Annual Reports Annual reports were presented by Department Heads with discussion following. A. Liquor Store — Manager John Colotti B. Fire & Rescue /Emergency Response — Fire Chief Greg Pederson C. Orono Police Department — Police Chief Correy Farniok D. Finance & Administration /Docks Administration — Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche E. Community Development/Planning /Zoning /Building Inspections — Community Development Director Sarah Smith F. Public Works Divisions 1. Public Works a. Public Works Director Carlton Moore - Projects b. Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson - Operations 2. Parks and Open Spaces a. Public Works Director Carlton Moore 3. Adlourn MOTION by Wegscheid, seconded by Gesch, to adjourn at 8:46 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus -761- $100 /day $300 /yr. Date of Single Dance License Year Annual Dance LICENSE # CITY OF MOUND 2415 WILSHIRE BLVD. MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC MUSIC PERMIT APPLICATION %D�,ANCE/LIVE A ( QS+ r A,, EVENT: �J r ' ) �S �b LOCATION OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC: ��i a f�_e 6"D / Y1% 11-lb 0 rj1 TYPE OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC:t7 TIME PERIOD OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC Sunday: 8pm- 11(:30pm}� (HOURS PERMITTED: Mon -Sat: 8pm- 12:30am — CHAIRPERSON OR (� 1 1 TITLE: /^4C1 M� i 5`4-(�D �- 1� �,+1 �n LA fi o CANT: Yl C, APPLICANT':_ tt ADDRESS:bUC �Be b � ADDRESS:02&� _ id M Ou Ad E-MAIL C�UfiG�F'o�� °�J% kl.rnn.us 021PHONE #:_ 4i 1c)' q0HOME PHONE #: WORK PHONE #: 7,f5,A -x/70. -Ld24 WORK PHONE #: J Date Applicant's Signature Department Approval /Denial Ll/ G� (Submit memo if denied) Approved Denied Police Dept. Adm.d. Fire Dent. -762- An 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 -472 -0600 Fax 952- 472 -0620 SEASONAL, BANNER & PORTABLE SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION SITE Property Address 2385 Commerce Blvd. Zone Business Name Our Lady of the Lake Church Phone 952- 472 -1284 APPLICANT Name Rhonda M. Eurich, Administrator Email reurich @oll.pvt.kl2.mn.us_ Phone 952 -472 -1284 ext. 161 Fax 952 -472 -1216 Other OWNER Name Fr. Tony O'Neill, Pastor Phone 952-472 -1284 ext. 172 Fax 952 -472 -1216 Other SIGN Company Name Address CONTRACTOR Contact Person Email Phone Fax Other See City Code Chapter 365.15 Subd 9 and 10 ❑ Seasonal Sign $25 - Dates from to Size — feet x feet = _sf Message Seasonal Signs - Seasonal signs of a temporary or portable nature may be used in the non - residential districts to promote or advertise on- premise seasonal services or merchandise. Such signs shall be limited to a maximum of thirty -two (32) square feet and shall not be left in place for more than a two (2) month period. Permits and fees shall be required for all seasonal signs, and permits may be issued no more than two (2) times per calendar year per business. ❑ Banner /Pennant $25 - Dates from to Describe event Sign locations (list or attach map) Temporary banners and pennants employed for grand openings or business establishments, special events or promotions and holidays are not exempt from permits and fees and shall be removed within fifteen (15) days upon permit issuance unless an alternate schedule is approved by the City Council. Temporary banners and pennants are prohibited from being placed upon any decorative fencing unless the banner or pennant is used in conjunction with a government, a quasi - public function, or similar - related special event. Permits for banners and pennants can be issued no more than four (4) times per calendar year. X Portable Sign (no fee) - Dates from ASAP_ to May 18, 2014 Number of signs 3 Sign locations (list or attach map) 2155 Commerce Blvd., 2411 Commerce Blvd and 5401 Shoreline Dr. Please see attached letter! Describe sign (message, materials, etc.) Our Lady of the Lake's Annual School Fundraiser, called the "BLAST." -763- Portable Signs used for the purpose of directing the public may be permitted under the following conditions: (a) Said sign is coincidental to, or used in conjunction with, a governmental unit or quasi - public function; and (b) The period of use of said sign shall not exceed ten (10) consecutive days, and (c) Signs shall not be used more than four (4) times during a calendar year; and (d) Signs shall be placed on the premises of the advertised event and /or on such other premises following approval of a temporary sign permit by the City of Mound. Administrative approval of a portable sign permit is permitted if the following conditions are met: 1. The sign is not being placed on public property. 2. Written permission from the property owner of record is provided if being located off - premises. 3. The criteria reference in subsections (a), (b), and (c) above are met. 4. The proposed location of the sign is reviewed and deemed acceptable by Mound Staff, which shall include the Police, Planning, and Engineering Departments, based on the following criteria: • The sign is not being placed in the road right -of -way. • The sign does not obstruct the sight triangle for pedestrian or vehicular traffic. • Placement of the sign does not create any potential traffic or other related hazard; and (e) Portable sign placement on public property requires City Council approval, and (f) Such signs shall require the issuance of a permit but will be exempt from all fees, and (g) In the instance of a multi -use facility, only one seasonal sign may be placed on the premises at any one time. Applicants are advised that incomplete applications or insufficient information can delay the processing of the permit request or may result in the application being rejected. Please fully complete all involved sections of the application and provide as much detail as possible, including, but not limited to, the proposed locations of signs, using addresses or landmarks, and written permission from the property owner for off -site locations. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE (OFFICE USE ONLY) SPECIAL CONDITIONS & COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY & DATE PLANS CHECKED BY I APPROVED BY & DATE COPIED APPROVED ZONING -764- Our Lady of the Lake Church 2385 Commerce Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 952 -472 -1284 Our'BLAST' signs will be placed at the following establishments: Carbone's Pizzeria and Grill 2155 Commerce Blvd. Current Owner has given us their permission. Caribou Coffee 5401 Shoreline Drive Current Owner has given us permission OLL School Fence 2411 Commerce Blvd. All of the Signs are Tx 20.' Thank you for your consideration. If you have any question, please contact me. Rhonda Eurich, Administrator 952 - 472 -1284 ext. 161 -765- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith City of Mound Planning and Building Department Date: April 17, 2014 Re: 2014 Mound Fire Relief Association Annual Fish Fry — Temporary Sign Permit(s) SUMMARY The Mound Fire Relief Association is requesting approval of a temporary sign permit(s) for the Annual Fish Fry event which is being held on Saturday, June 7, 2014. Waiver of the $25.00 temporary sign permit and extended periods for the portable signs are being requested. In summary, the following signs are proposed: Banners — 2 locations adjacent to County Roads in Mound (545ide Park and Mound Fire Station) Hennepin County Transportation Department electronic sign boards -3 signs Details regarding the request are included on temporary sign permit application that has been submitted. Respectfully, Staff offers the following information: 1. Pennant / Banner. City Code Section 119 -4 (i) (3) allows temporary banners and pennants employed for special events as long as they are removed after (30) days unless an extended period is approved by the City Council. The requested 5/24/14 — 6/07/14 timeframe is within the standard 30 -day period. 2. Portable Signs. City Code Section 119 allows for the placement of portable signs and is eligible for administrative approval in most instances subject to conditions, including a 30 -day allowance. Portable sign placement on public property requires approval by the City Council. The requested 05/24/14- 06/07/14 timeframe is within the standard 30 -day period. 3. General Sign Provisions Applicable to All Districts. Illuminated Signs. No illuminated sign which changes in either color or intensity of light shall be permitted except one giving time, date, temperature, weather or similar public service information. The City, in granting permits for illuminated signs, shall specify the hours during which same may be kept lighted when necessary to prevent the creation of a nuisance. -766- 4. Similar to previous years, the Fire Department plans to use the Hennepin County electronic sign message boards to promote the annual 2014 fish fry event. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends that the City Council approve the temporary sign permit request(s) for banners and the Hennepin County Transportation Department electronic sign boards for the Mound Fire Department Fish Fry 2014 event and grants permission for sign placement on City -owned property subject to the following conditions: 1. As applicable, the applicant shall work with Staff to evaluate all proposed sign locations. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining permission from the current property owner for sign placement on private property. 2. Submittal of a temporary permit application and waiver of the involved fee. 3. The City shall reserve the right to regulate hours of operation for any illuminated sign so as to prevent the creation of a nuisance, if applicable. 4. The applicants obtain permission from all private property owners prior to placement. 5. All signage is removed immediately following the event. 6. No signs can be placed within any County Road right -of -way unless approval is granted by Hennepin County. 7. No sign shall be placed in the sight triangle or obstruct vehicle or pedestrian traffic. Sign placement shall be subject to field modification by Mound Staff, if needed. 0 Page 2 -767- b 2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 - 472 -0600 Fax 952472 -0620 SITE APPLICANT OWNER SIGN CONTRACTOR Property Address Business Name • fAJ • Note: Any information supplied on this form will be considered public according to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. Phone i2 -eS Name ' c cnr r'4 6ritr SSOUO -fteV - rsni1 Email CAIl l � r"O �fYe Phone_ Fax 2152-4' -,577a' Other (rOYh Name Ut> df MOLL? end NOOMY firms Det7rt1±01m f Phone g5o2 -L/%A- 0&03 Fax g5a yid -06�n Other Company Name (,(.LS`{- nq // IGaJ�e YiYIBI'�- Wameyli11 fill 6' %eC Address A1114 Contact Person -� /)ry'lJJInF Phone q6_A- K-7,) -. 9 4Z_< Other ❑ Seasonal Sign $25 - Dates from to Size _ feet x _ feet = sf Message Seasonal Signs - Seasonal signs of a temporary or portable nature may be used in the non - residential districts to Promote or advertise on- premise seasonal services or merchandise. Such signs shall be limited to a maximum of thirty -two (32) square feet and shall not be left in place for more than a two (2) month period. Permits and fees shall be required for all seasonal signs, and permits may be issued no more than two (2) times per calendar year per business. 'Banner /Pennant $25 - Dates from S � t4 to Describe event MYF8 Rc kef A<An,w frn- Sign locations (list or attach map) Temporary banners and pennants employed for grand openings of business establishments, special events or promotions and holidays are not exempt from permits and fees and shall be removed within thirty (30) days upon permit issuance unless an alternate schedule is approved by the City Council. Temporary banners and pennants are prohibited from being placed upon any decorative fencing unless the banner or pennant is used in conjunction with a government, a quasi - public function, or similar - related special event. Permits for banners and pennants can be issued no more than four (4) times per calendar year. RJ Portable Sign (no fee) - Dates from to 4 a- t4- Number of signs 3 Sign locations (list or attach map) d esAU?U- MafYrlc.ietI{J �Sli�fQtr(/Ze (fir . f , . t — Describe sign (message, materials, etc.) J i rd5 G„ � U� ,�L� �Yec of M i e L14 Hell ne�in 'lam768zc_l��f A Portable Signs used for the purpose of directing the public may be permitted under the following conditions: (a) Said sign is coincidental to, or used in conjunction with, a governmental unit or quasi - public function; and (b) The period of use of said sign shall not exceed thirty (30) consecutive days; and (c) Signs shall not be used more than four (4) times during a calendar year; and (d) Signs shall be placed on the premises of the advertised event and /or on such other premises following approval of a temporary sign permit by the City of Mound. Administrative approval of a portable sign permit is permitted if the following conditions are met: 1. The sign is not being placed on public property. 2. Written permission from the property owner of record is provided if being located off - premises. 3. The criteria reference in subsections (a), (b), and (c) above are met. 4. The proposed location of the sign is reviewed and deemed acceptable by Mound Staff, which shall include the Police, Planning, and Engineering Departments, based on the following criteria: • The sign is not being placed in the road right -of -way. • The sign does not obstruct the sight triangle for pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Placement of the sign does not create any potential traffic or other related hazard; and (e) Portable sign placement on public property requires City Council approval; and (f) Such signs shall require the issuance of a permit but will be exempt from all fees; and (g) In the instance of a multi -use facility, only one seasonal sign may be placed on the premises at any one time. Applicants are advised that incomplete applications or insufficient information can delay the processing of the permit request or may result in the application being rejected. Please fully complete all involved sections of the application and provide as much detail as possible, including, but not limited to, the proposed locations of signs, using addresses or landmarks, and written permission from the property owner for off -site locations. (OFFICE USE ONLY) SPECIAL CONDITIONS & COMMENTS: 16 A?x ll, -AO /0,1 DATE RECEIVED BY & DATE PLANS CHECKED BY APPROVED BY & DATE COPIED APPROVED ZONING 1&9 5 .r $100 /day (f 1i A t 7 f 300 /yr. Date of Single Dance License Year Annual Dance LICENSE# CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC DANCE/LIVE MUSIC PERMIT APPLICATION EVENT: Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association - Fish Fry and Dance 2014 LOCATION OF DANCE /LIVE MUSIC: in front of Mound fire station, on drive apron and in roadway at 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound TYPE OF DANCE /LIVE MUSIC: Variety of Dance, Rock -n -Roll, and Oldies TIME PERIOD OF DANCE /LIVE MUSIC: Saturday June 7,2014,8:00 pm -12:00 midnight (HOURS PERMITTED: Mon -Sat: 8pm- 12:30am — Sunday: 8pm- 11:30pm) CHAIRPERSON OR APPLICANT: Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association TITLE: Fire Chief Gregory S. Pederson ADDRESS: 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 HOME PHONE #: 952- 292 -0150 WORK PHONE #: 952 -472 -3533 �- Date ADDRESS: 6087 Aspen Road Mound, MN 55364 HOME PHONE #: same WORK PHONE #: ssar e® ,, ! _ZA Applicant's Signa e l wl,�_ ) Department Approval/Denial Mlaiv (Submit memo if denied) Ap ro ed Denied' A, , Police Dept. Adm. Fire De t. / .• Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number _ Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association Jan 4,1937 Address City State Zip Code 2415 Wilshire Blvd Mound I IMinnescita 155364 Name of person making application Business phone Home phone Gregory 5, Pederson, Fire Chief 952- 472 -3555 952 -472 -5785 Date(s) of event Type of organization June 7, 2014 E] Club 0 Charitable [] Religious ® Other non -profit Organization officer's name City State Zip Andrew Drilling- Relief President Mound Minnesota 55364 Add New Officer Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. 2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mound, MN 55364- located at the Mound Fire Station inside apparatus bay and outside building in parking lot and on front apron. If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. N/A if the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. Minnesota Joint Underwriting Association - Minnesota Liquor Liability Assigned Risk Plan - Coverage $1,000,000 APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City of Mound City /County Waived City Fee Amount N/A Date Fee Paid IN Date Approved Permit Date Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement (VOTE: Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and /or county to the address above If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the permit for the event. kQ� b a cb- -b Q 5a HID D 10 AO -770- Page 1 of 1 Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 444 Cedar Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651- 201 -7500 Fax 651- 297 -5259 TTY 651- 282 -6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY A €cohaE & Gambling Enforcement TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number _ Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association Jan 4,1937 Address City State Zip Code 2415 Wilshire Blvd Mound I IMinnescita 155364 Name of person making application Business phone Home phone Gregory 5, Pederson, Fire Chief 952- 472 -3555 952 -472 -5785 Date(s) of event Type of organization June 7, 2014 E] Club 0 Charitable [] Religious ® Other non -profit Organization officer's name City State Zip Andrew Drilling- Relief President Mound Minnesota 55364 Add New Officer Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. 2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mound, MN 55364- located at the Mound Fire Station inside apparatus bay and outside building in parking lot and on front apron. If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. N/A if the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. Minnesota Joint Underwriting Association - Minnesota Liquor Liability Assigned Risk Plan - Coverage $1,000,000 APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City of Mound City /County Waived City Fee Amount N/A Date Fee Paid IN Date Approved Permit Date Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement (VOTE: Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and /or county to the address above If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the permit for the event. kQ� b a cb- -b Q 5a HID D 10 AO -770- Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 ' )c a { h l3 931811 Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIOUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS. Group. is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park area. GCi PERMIT FEE: $300/DAY TO $600/DAY* 3D6 Pat- DAMAGE DEPOSIT: $500 TO $1000/DAY* SOO 11) ac& `417 *Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements. Date(s) of Use Area to be Used Time Frame 12 00 - -Yl Intended Use Somas Expected Attendance /D D P1 R e / - }1 c J/t_ 30— 0 ' TpP - r '7; 1-5 Organization %%% `Gt yt e7`o aka CAas /L, ea-Sy CIK�6 Representative's Name 1-Q Address z S-52 iii 2zz74 GUS Telephone No. Home: 5'27-3,51-666 5 : C e'll/ Drivers License Number :2 2 V j B 3 15 4 6) 3 Deriartmental AvDroval a- 1D CIV Clerk Police Dept. Park Dept. -771- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0636 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Carlton Moore, Public Works Director Date: April 22, 2014 Re: Parks and Open Space Commission recommendation for the new playscape location At its April 10, 2014 meeting Parks and Open Space Commission reviewed the recommended locations for the new playscape structure the City recently purchased with the assistance of a grant. The two locations being considered were Sorbo Park on Evergreen Road and Three Points Park. The two existing playscape structures are in similarly poor condition and the commission chose Three Points Park for the installation this year. Recommendation staff recommends the City Council approve the installation of the new playscape structure at Three Points Park. -772- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING WeCAB WEEK IN MOUND MAY 4-10,2014 WHEREAS, in 2010, door -to -door dial -a -ride services were curtailed, resulting in transportation gaps in weekday service to the Mound area; and WHEREAS, dial -a -ride weekend services were also eliminated; and WHEREAS, there was a plea from the community for the City to look at the issue and to assist by way of allowing City resources to be put toward addressing the transportation gaps; and WHEREAS, key leaders within the community came together and verified the need to fill the transportation gaps of the greater community; and WHEREAS, out of this study and commitment by the communities, came WeCAB — Community Area Busing; and WHEREAS, door -to -door rides are provided by volunteer drivers to shopping, work, church, social and medical appointments; and WHEREAS, rides are posted by volunteer dispatchers and drivers get to choose their trips; and WHEREAS, the rides are made affordable through subsidies by Ridgeview Medical Center, Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging and other generous local sponsors; and WHEREAS, WeCAB is an award winning local effort, as a recipient of the "Hospital Charitable Services Award" from Jackson Health Care in Atlanta, Georgia, January 2013; and WHEREAS, the concept is coveted in neighboring regions, with expansion being the next great effort that will add to WeCAB's long -term sustainability. WHEREAS, WeCAB, serving Mound and the five neighbor cities of Spring Park, Navarre, Minnetrista, St Bonifacius and Maple Plain, significantly contributes to the independence of the members of these communities, getting area residents to shopping, work church, social and medical appointments. -773- NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to recognize WeCAB and declare May 4 -10, 2014, as "WeCAB Week in Mound," and appreciate and recognize the Volunteer Drivers and Dispatchers of the greater area for their volunteerism and support of personal independence and economic sustainability of our communities. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk -774- Mayor Mark Harms February 2, 2014 Dear Mayor /City Representative, This is to update your on the concept we have raised to consider establishing a scenic byway around Lake Minnetonka. First, let me apologize for the delay in getting this off the ground. We have had some difficulty coordinating a time with the state scenic byway office for them to conduct an informational meeting for us. They have now committed to a time and place. Here is the information: Subject: Scenic Byway Concept for Lake Minnetonka Date: Monday, February 24, 2014 Time: 9:30 - 11:00 a.m. Place: Headquarters, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard, Minnetonka, MN 55345 Attending from the State (MNDOT): Katie Caskey, Office of Transportation System Management Lynette Roshell, Office of State Aid Carol Zoff, Transportation Alternative Coordinator Holly Slagle, Scenic Byway Coordinator The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss the relative merits /costs /issues involved in creating a scenic byway. We will present some of the thinking behind the proposal, and the state will discuss implementation details as well as some of their experiences with other byways in the state. I very much hope you can attend. If you are unable to do so, I would invite you to designate someone else to participate in your place. I am confident we will know a lot more about the undertaking by the end of the meeting. We can then share that with our respective cities to decide whether it makes sense or not. I look forward to seeing you on the 24th. Warm regards, Ken Willcox Mayor City of Wayzata Phone: 952- 404 -5300 Fax. 952- 404 -5318 e7.77.5..-Y@wayzata.org home page: www.wayzata org Mayor: City of Wayzata Ken Willcox 600 Rice Street City Council: Wayzata, NIN 55391 -1734 Jack Amdal Andrew Mullin Tom Tanner Bridget Anderson City bhmager: Heidi Nelson This is to update your on the concept we have raised to consider establishing a scenic byway around Lake Minnetonka. First, let me apologize for the delay in getting this off the ground. We have had some difficulty coordinating a time with the state scenic byway office for them to conduct an informational meeting for us. They have now committed to a time and place. Here is the information: Subject: Scenic Byway Concept for Lake Minnetonka Date: Monday, February 24, 2014 Time: 9:30 - 11:00 a.m. Place: Headquarters, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard, Minnetonka, MN 55345 Attending from the State (MNDOT): Katie Caskey, Office of Transportation System Management Lynette Roshell, Office of State Aid Carol Zoff, Transportation Alternative Coordinator Holly Slagle, Scenic Byway Coordinator The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss the relative merits /costs /issues involved in creating a scenic byway. We will present some of the thinking behind the proposal, and the state will discuss implementation details as well as some of their experiences with other byways in the state. I very much hope you can attend. If you are unable to do so, I would invite you to designate someone else to participate in your place. I am confident we will know a lot more about the undertaking by the end of the meeting. We can then share that with our respective cities to decide whether it makes sense or not. I look forward to seeing you on the 24th. Warm regards, Ken Willcox Mayor City of Wayzata Phone: 952- 404 -5300 Fax. 952- 404 -5318 e7.77.5..-Y@wayzata.org home page: www.wayzata org -776- -777- r U 0 • r_ • • 27 a • -778- Cf) M U) > M m m 0 0 >1 W -Y 0 0 c m 0 m .2 0 D a- ,E5 U) cro) (L) C: a) 0 c C: 20mo c N 0 0 .— 0 0 >, (L) M 0 0 0 CL > 0 U) 0 , w Co -C Ilu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 >1 -778- -779- 1 ME co M co M a) Co O C� ui ME -781- _0 C6 j2 > co (3 0 4-a U o CO m 4-a 0 CL 4-a E u) ED, m cu C: m ui -781- -782- Q O co co 4— 0 4-a 4— 0 CIO (a) C) . .... co � � \� CL -782- Im •m Proposal for a Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway (Prepared by Ron Anderson, Wayzata) Why create a Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway? To Protect Resources: An official byway makes it easier to argue for preserving natural, scenic and historical resources. To Enhance Community Recognition: State and National byways increase the visibility of —a road corridor, the communities connected, and the resources available. Ta Enhance Community Pride and Vision: Byways connect communities and promote the importance of historical sites, and the richness of natural, scenic and recreation resources. To Encourage Partnering: Not only do byways bring communities together, but also they suggest reasons for cooperative activities involving businesses, nonprofit organizations, and voluntary groups. A sense of common good may emerge and help to guide improvements in the lives of all residents in the byway corridor. To Boost Economic Development: Perhaps the most tangible benefit from byway designation comes from economic development. This results from both tourism and increased use of business services by residents within the byway corridor. This can result in more community pride and vitality. Slight increases in traffic are a small price to pay for improving the image of the Lake as a whole and appreciation of its resources. For example, have you been to Gale Woods or the Excelsior Museum or the Burwell House? Read down the list in Table 1, which contains about 140 "attractions" around the lake to see how many of these places you have not experienced. Think also about the future. If we do not do more now to preserve natural and historical resources, they may be lost to future generations. What is a scenic byway? A "scenic byway" is a transportation corridor recognized for one or more archeological, cultural, historic, natural, recreational and scenic qualities. It can be designated as such nationally, by a State, or by a local unit of government. We seek official recognition of a Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway by the State of Minnesota. Minnesota's Scenic Byways Program has so far approved 22 scenic byways in the State. Funds can be awarded by the state or national scenic byway programs for planning, conservation, preservation and marketing activities of potential byways. The National Scenic Bvways Program administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation is a grass -roots collaborative effort established to help preserve and -785- enhance selected roads throughout the United States. The National Scenic Byways Program has funded 2,926 projects for state and nationally designated byway routes. What is Proposed for a Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway? The Lake area has been divided into four scenic routes in the two maps below. The first map shows the Eastern portion of the Lake as the main scenic byway with a side or auxiliary route from Wayzata to Minnetonka Mills, which in the early days before the Gray's Bay Dam was part of Lake Minnetonka. On the first map, the main scenic byway route is shown in pink and the Minnetonka Mills side route is marked in green. The starting point of each route is marked as mile 0 (zero) and the other numbers along the route are the distances in miles from the starting points. The second map (Map 2), gives the western end of the lake including not only the Upper Lake but also the headwaters area to St. Bonifacius. This Western route is marked in blue. A side or auxiliary route along North Shore Drive is marked in purple. Each of the two main routes adds up to about 20 miles in length for a total of 41 miles. The side (auxiliary) routes add an additional 11 miles. The scenic byway plan as now conceived involves the following 14 communities: Excelsior Orono Deephaven Shorewood Greenwood Spring Park Minnetonka St. Bonifacius Minnetonka Beach Tonka Bay Minnetrista Wayzata Mound Woodland. However, there are only four principal Chambers of Commerce and six Historical Societies. (See Table 2 for a list.) Thus, the organization work will be less demanding than it might seem. Among the many pieces of this project that remain to be completed is a complete listing of the key historical sites around the lake. A preliminary list of about 50 historical sites is embedded in both Tables 1 and 2 However, this list is not complete. Note that no current residences are included in the list of historical sites because of privacy considerations. The current list of sites is not yet completed, as most of the existing historical commercial buildings in Excelsior and Wayzata are not yet included. The historical societies will be solicited for help in making a complete list. The workshop on June 21, led by Bill Neuman, will begin to clarify the remaining work to be done and how best to organize to get all of the cities and organizations around the lake to work together. EM ffne M- Lake Minnetonka Scenic 8 wa (Proposed Routes with Attractions and Places Route Mile Attraction or Place A A. Main Scenic B wa Route U er Lake A 0 We zata Blvd at Freeway Exit for Co. Rd. 101 South. A 0.5 Bushaway (Co. Rd. 1011 and McGinty (Co. Rd 16) Intersection A 0.7 Locust Hills Trail and Old Sweatts Barn A 1.3 Bushaway Causeway Between Gray's Bay and Wayzata Bay A 1.5 Gray's Bay Bridge A 1.6 Gray's Bay Public Access & Marina A 1.8 Stone Arch on McKenzie Rd off Breezy Pt. Rd A 2.4 Groveland Community on Minnetonka Blvd at 101 (Ty Abel's Corner) A 2.6 Deephaven City Line A 2.9 Minnetonka Blvd continues on Maplewood Rd Going South A 3.5 Thorpe Park _ A Minnetonka Blvd continues right on Carson's Bay Boulevard A 4.6 Deephaven Public Access E4.3 A 4.7 Minnetonka Yacht Club and Carson's Bay Bridge A 5 Deephaven City Hall A 5 Cottagewood Rd to Cottagewood General Store (0 -3 mile) A 5 Crossing of Lake Minnetonka Regional LRT Trail with Parking A 5.7 Greenwood City Limits A 6.6 Old Log Theatre _ A 6.7 Greenwood Marina A 6.8 St- Albans Bay Bridge A 7 Excel Marina A 7.1 End of Trolley Line Port of Excelsior and Excelsior CommonslPark/Seach A T5 A L 7.6 Dock Cinema and various other historical sites in Excelsior South Lake - Excelsior Chamber of Commerce, 202 Water St, A 7.6 A 7.7 Excelsior Old public School at 260 School Rd & Excelsior High School A 7.7 Excelsior History Society and Museum and Excelsior Trolley Line begins A 7.7 Crossing of Lake Minnetonka Regional LRT Trail with Parking A 81 Highway 19 intersection with Water St. A 9.1 Shorewood City Hall A 9.2 Mail at Smithtown Rd A 9.7 Manitou Park A 10.2 Old Orchard Park (on West side of road) A 10.3 Tonka Bay City Hall A 10.7 Tonka Bay Rd. to Tonka Bay Marina and Caribbean Marina A 10.9 Old Channel Bay A Narrows Bridge A _11.3 12 Navarre City Line A 12 -1 Gray Freshwater Laboratory A 122 Co. Rd. 15 (Shoreline Dr.) Intersection with Co. Rd. 19 A 12.5 Minnetonka Beach City Hall -789- -790- A 13 St. Martins Church and Westwood Rd. to historic Lafayette Bay Country Club A 13.6 Minnetonka Beach City Park A 13.8 Orono City line A 13 Arcola Bridge A 14.1 Smith's Bay A 14.6 Highway 51 (N. Shore Dr.) Intersection with Co. R. 15 (Shoreline Dr.) A 14.8 Sailors World Marina _ A 15.3 Brackets Point A 15.5 Tanager Lake A 157 Browns Bay Marina and N. Shore Marina East A 16 Orono Orchard Road A 16.5 Ferndale Marsh A 16.7 -- ._ Shoreline Dr. (Co. Rd. 15) exits toward Wayzata A 17.1 Woodhill Country Club A 17.5 Blake School A 17.8 Ferndale Road South and Grove Lane East A A 18 Wayzata Beach and Regional Trail Parking Wayzata Boat Works and Wayzata Marine 18.1 A 18.2 Wayzata Train Depot, Historical Society & Chamber of Commerce A 18.5 Wayzata Waterfront (Lake Street) and various historical sites A. 18.7 Wayzata New Muni (Lake St & Superior Blvd) A 18.8 Promenade of Wayzata (Old Wayzata Bay Center) A 19.2 Colonial Mall (Wayzata Blvd &Central) A 19.7 Bushaway Rd (Co. Rd 101) and Wayzata Blvd (Co- Rd. 15) B B. Minnetonka Mills Aux. Scenic B wa Route B _ B 0 Wayzata New Muni (Lake St & Superior Blvd) Wayzata Bay Shops and Wayzata Bay Center 0.2 B 0.5 Wayzata Public Access (continuing on McGinty West (Co. Rd. 16) B 0.5 Wayzata Yacht Club B 0.9 Bushaway (Co. Rd. 101) Intersection with McGinty West (Co. Rd. 16) B 2 Rufus Rand House (now Cargill Headquarters) B 3.5 End of McGinty West at Minnetonka Blvd (Co- Rd. 5) B 3.6 494 Overpass over Minnetonka Blvd B 4.1 Intersection with Plymouth Rd (Co. Rd. 61) B 4.2 Historic Burwell House and Burwell Park,13209 McGinty Rd East B 4.2 Mill Cottage and Mill Office/Workshop, 13209 McGinty Rd East B 42 Walking Tour of Old Minnetonka Miils,13209 McGinty Rd East B 4.3 Heading West on Minnetonka Rd (Co. Rd. 5) B 5.9 Minnetonka Government and Community Center and Ice Arena B 6.9 Fairchild Ave and Grays Bay Blvd to Gray's Bay Dam B 7.4 "Gro Tonka" Park B 7.5 Groveland Cemetery and Groveland School B 7.9 Intersection of Minnetonka Blvd with Co. Rd. 101 (Ty Abel's Corner) C C. Western Scenic Bgwav Route (U Doer Lake and Gale Woods C 0 Smithtown Rd Intersection with Manitou Rd (Co. Rd. 19 C 0.1 Minnetonka Country Club C 0.8 Smithtown Way and Crossing of Lake Mtka LRT Trail -790- C 2 Howards Point Road to Howard Point R Marina C 2 Peter Gideon Farmhouse, 24590 Glen Rd off Howard Point Rd C 3.2 Lake Virginia Public Boat Access C 3.5 Hwv 7 turn west Lake Zumbra C 4.7 C 4.8 Minnetrista City Line C 5.2 Co. Rd. 44 North Intersection C 5.2 Lake Minnetonka Regional Park and 0.2 miles north on Co. Rd. 44) C 5.2 _Beach Crane Island Historic District (.3 miles off Regional Park) C 9.2 Carver Park Access C 10,8 Six Mile Marsh C 10.9 St. Bonifacius C 71.2 Dakota Trail Crossing HCRRA C 11.5 Main St Co. R. 92 Going North C 11.5 St. Bonifacius Public Library_ C 12.6 Bartlett Blvd Co. Rd. 110 Going East C C 14.6 14.6 _ Entrance to Gate Woods and Crossing Dakota Trail Entrance to Westonka Recreational Park C 14.8 Halstead Drive to public access to Halsted Bay C 1T3 Cook's Bay Park with public access C 17.9 Lake Minnetonka Area Chamber of Commerce (2323 Commerce Blvd, Mound) C 18.1 Intersection of Co. Rd. 110 with Shoreline Blvd Co. Rd. 15 C 18.2 Mound business district and Mound City Hall C 18.3 Lost Lake and Marsh C 18.5 Old Tonka Toys facto Seton Bridge and Spring Park City Line C 19.2 C 20.2 Old Tonka Toys Headquarters C 20.2 County Sheriff Water Patrol C 20.3 Sunset Drive Co. Rd. 51 C 20.3 S r ng Park City Hall (Spring Park Elementary School, 4.349 Warren Ave C 20.3 Westonka Yacht Club Public boat access and restroom C 20.3 C 20.8 Casco Point Circle Park C 21.1 end of scenic loo Intersection of Co. Rd. 15 with Go. Rd. 19 D D. North Shore Dr. Aux. Scenic 8 a Route D 0 Co. Rd. 15 (Shoreline Dr.) Intersection with Go. Rd. 19 D 0.4 Coffee Bridge and Lord Fletcher's Old Lake Lodge D 1.1 Hendrickson's Bridge D 12 Public Beach Access and restrooms D 1.3 Wayzata Marine D 1.8 North Shore Marina D 2.1 Noerenber 's Bride _ Noerenberq Memorial Park _ D 2.3 D 31 Minnetonka Art School D 12 _ Crossing of Dakota Rail Trail _ D 3.4 End of N. Shore Dr. Co. Rd. 51 at Co. Rd. 15 -791- Additional Resources of Proposed Lake Minnetonka Proposed Scenic Byways Including Historical Attractions by City, Historical Society, Chambers of Commerce, Parks and Preserves, and Trails Historical Attractions by City o Excelsior • Excelsior Historical Society & Museum, 305 Water St • Old Excelsior Public School Bldg., 261 School Ave (1899) • Excelsior High school (1916) • Trinity Episcopal Church Chapel, 300 Second St (1863) in National Register • Dock Cinema, 26 Water St • Oak Hill Cemetery, Excelsior Blvd • Excelsior streetcar line (1906) • Minnehaha Steamboat at Bayside Marine • Deephaven • Minnetonka Yacht Club • Cottagewood General Store, Cottagewood (1893) • Greenwood F Greenwood Marina ° The Old Log Theater o Minnetonka Burwell House, 13209 McGinty Rd E. (1883) Mill Cottage, 13209 McGinty Rd E. (1894 moved) Mill Office/Workshop, 13209 McGinty Rd E. (1894 moved) o Minnetonka Beach Camp Memorial Chapel (1888) now St Martin's on the Lake Chapel Lafayette Country Club (1899) Minnetonka Beach City Hall o Minnetrista 6 Crane Island Historic District • Mound a Mound Baptist Assembly Grounds (1900) now Highland Park Bridge to Halstead's Bay (1890) g Former Tonka Toy factory (1967) • Orono • Noerenberg Estate (now Memorial GardenSO (1903) • Woodhill Country Club (1917) o Shorewood Crane Island Historic District Peter Gideon Farmhouse 24590 Glen Rd, (1854) site of horticultural experiments Howard's Point — the last area Indian Settlement (1911) Spring Park -792- • Tonka Toys Headquarter Bldg. and Tower • Henn. Co. Water Patrol g Casco Point Commons ® Spring Park Elementary School, 4349 Warren Ave (1906) now City Hall • St. Bonifacius m St. Bonifacius Public Library • Tonka Beach • The Narrows Channel (1883) • The Narrows Bridge (1910) • Wayzata • Wayzata Train Depot (Great Northern), 402 Lake St E • Wayzata Post Office, 229 Minnetonka Ave S. (1941) • Wayzata Congregational Church, 605 Rice St (1916) now the Unitarian church • Meyer Bros, Dairy, 105 Lake St E. (1941) Old Drug Store, 275 Lake St E. (1920) Wayzata State Bank Bldg., 305 Lake St E, (1922) ® Kallestad Building, 401 Lake St E. (1875) Wayzata Country Club Locust Hills Barn, 500 Bushaway Rd o Woodland Gillette Stone Arch on Stone Arch Rd off 101 & Breezy Point Rd (1912) Groveland Methodist Assembly Grounds (1909) Breezy Point, formerly Spirit Knob, a Dakota Indian Sacred Site Historical Societies • Carver County Historical Society • Excelsior • Lake Minnetonka • Minnetonka, 14600 Mtka Blvd • Wayzata • Westonka Chambers of Commerce w Excelsior 0 Lake Minnetonka Area (2323 Commerce Blvd, Mound) e Wayzata Parks and Preserves o Baker Park Reserve • Carver Park Reserve c Lowry Nature Center • Gale Woods • Noerenberg Memorial Park • Minnesota Landscape Arboretum -793- Island Preserves • Big Island • Crane Island (National Historical Places) • Wawatasso Island • Wild Goose Chase Island Trails o Luce Line Trail o Dakota Trail (also called Hennepin Co. Regional Rail Authority (HCRRA)) o Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail (also called Hennepin Co. Regional Rail Authority (HCRRA)) .m Scenic Byway Reference Materials 1) From MnDOT Scenic Byway Pro¢ram The link I have provided below has been of help for other byways that were in the beginning stages of a byway. This tool was developed by the FHWA for training purposes. h_ptt • / /www byEa sl0I.org/bywaysl01/ BYWAY GROUPS Over the course of the history of the Program, it has become clear that the success of many byways is a function of the amount of activity and level of management within the local byway groups. Therefore the quality of individual byway experiences and the quality of the collection as a whole is related to the success of local byway groups. A strong byway group may include, citizens, CVB's, Local Units of Governments etc. OPTIONAL FRAMEWORK The oversight of the byway is provided by the strong leadership within your byway group. The time commitment is entirely up to the group as to how frequent they would like to meet. In regards to cost -this is a grassroots group. However, if Local Units of Government or CVB's etc. wish to participate in the byway group, it would be up to them if it is paid or unpaid. INTRINSIC VALUES The presentation that was left for your use in presenting to the communities, explains the intrinsic qualities. You need only one to be considered for state byway designation. STATE DESIGNATION I sent Bryan Gadow the "King of Trails Scenic Byway" application. The application shows the information needed to become a state scenic byway. The Scenic Byway Commission will review your submitted application. The applicant will be officially informed by letter of the Scenic Byway Commissions decision to designate. I will also let you know verbally, prior to receiving the official letter. I may call to request further information or clarification if needed. Solicitations for National designation are not an option at this time. The Federal Highway Administration will notify the Scenic Byway Coordinators when they have a solicitation for national designation. STATE AID STANDARDS The State Aid Standards apply if the byway is on a CSAH. Lynnette Roshell, from our Office of State Aid will answer those questions if needed. -795- ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES Legacy funding, Explore MN, are a couple of suggestions. The Minnetonka Byway group is free to brainstorm on any other funding sources they may be able to obtain. ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT Annually, I will ask the byways to provide me with an "Annual Activity Report." You can provide this to me in a simple letter format. Attached is the Memorandum of Understanding for the Scenic Byway Commission as requested by Debra. I hope I answered all you questions. Contact me at any time. Holly M. Slagle Scenic Byway Program Coordinator Office of Environmental Stewardship 651- 366 -3623 2) Scenic Byway benefits — From WI DOT Scenic Byway Program Benefits of Scenic Byway designation include: • Supports tourism and economic development in communities all along a designated byway. • Unique signs, markers, brochures and ongoing promotional efforts can enhance a community's "marketability. • State Scenic Byways can potentially be designated a National Scenic Byway or All — American Road. Such byways are marketed to national and international travelers, bringing additional recognition and potential economic benefits to area communities. • Both state or nationally—designated scenic byways may be eligible for grants or funding • Promotes partnerships between local governments, businesses, civic groups and community leaders. • Strengthens civic pride, and makes communities an even more attractive place to live and work. • Serves to promote an area's scenic, historical and recreational qualities. -796- m R t `a 1�f tom; lam• 2 im i% ia, -797- • w_ 04 � . #) #) � \ �} t w sm I� (W !W4 a �rJ Y V p3H 1a"y'V 4r' W^I Vt S4 j X -799- ao ysi> � aw �} �en+l 7•w c I� (W !W4 a �rJ Y V p3H 1a"y'V 4r' W^I Vt S4 j X -799- r � ?� � � { � ¥ ?� � \ q g g q g R (Y) C4 eq rq V1. � : IM k R All an Ln ccS 0 0 � L- v cn 0 ® N L p v9 > L rz ® ® d v O w ut -- — 0 > V 0 0� �a�p A, AI All ■ � \ ? \ � f �d t } # / » t « � ■ � # \ � \ � # / 4: ■: � � z « � MN m : It ft 2 . • / \� _ : B � \ � f ' # < m : It ft 2 . • / \� _ : B 0 O 0 Ln (A cl (V c 0 rz CO cn � : \ m I � I a Now a mom m Now «7 � \ � q c & � V) E / 2 � & © V) 2 / E E Ln & c @ o ® 2 CL g & & q 4-5 c ? / ./ 2 .E a q Q 4-1 � CL 2 4 $ bas q_ m 4-J L > � Q Cl 0 .0 0 � 8 +J ® cn cn 0 �_ �mm � a� ® to v_ C) Ln 0 _ _ K slow 0 N (V 0 ru I& A, tr 0 mom DROMMAMM J f6 C i w R U 6 L!. 63 N a d3 m N p , m R w S a Q a. Q a� m. a M m ems+ :7 i I 0 N .i V N O N t ei ief D M 1 C5 N N H p N w w, a N w1 !�5 N O H m C N N T Kandis Hanson Subject: FW: SCENIC BYWAY FOLLOW UP Subject: SCENIC BYWAY FOLLOW UP Dear scenic byway attendee, I wanted to add my thanks to you for attending the subject meeting yesterday. I know you had to carve valuable time out of your day to participate. Thank you for going to that trouble. I think /hope we accomplished our objective of introducing the topic and sharing official explanations of what a scenic byway is, and as importantly, what it isn't. By now you should have received the powerpoint presentations that Bryan Gadow sent out this morning. I hope that helps as you continue considering whether this might work for your community. Yesterday's meeting was just a first step. I know we didn't address all of the questions you may have, and others will certainly come up as well. In my opinion the scenic byway tool could be a powerful opportunity for all of our cities. It would provide a platform for highlighting and protecting our valued history and natural resources. It would also engage residents and visitors and direct them to amenities they might enjoy in each city. As Minnetonka Mayor Schneider said, there are still lots of questions. If I can be of any help as you and we sort through this, please don't hesitate to contact me. Again, what we would be hoping for by June 1 is a resolution that your city wants to continue the dialogue that could lead ultimately to a byway application and designation. Thank you again. Best regards, Ken Willcox Mayor City of Wayzata -811- 1 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A FEASIBLITY STUDY FOR A LAKE MINNETONKA SCENIC BYWAY CONCEPT WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has a scenic byway system with twenty one (2 1) designated state scenic byways, but none of the roads around Lake Minnetonka are included in a state scenic byway; and WHEREAS, the designation of a state scenic byway route imposes no financial or legal requirements on the participating jurisdictions, except the individual marketing and branding efforts determined by each jurisdiction, and that no new billboards are allowed along the route; and WHEREAS, participating communities within a designed scenic byway may apply for funding through the Federal Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) for eligible activities such as on- road and off -road trail facilities, historic preservation and rehabilitation efforts, and environmental mitigation, with a local match of twenty percent (20 %); and WHEREAS, there are fourteen (14) Lake Minnetonka area communities (City of Minnetonka Beach, City of Woodland, City of Deephaven, City of Tonka Bay, City of Minnetrista, City of Excelsior, City of Mound, City of Greenwood, City of Victoria, City of Spring Park, City of Minnetonka, City of Shorewood, City of Wayzata, and City of Orono; and WHEREAS, representatives from some of the fourteen (14) Lake Minnetonka area communities, Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MNDOT) Office of Scenic Byway Programs, Three Rivers Park District, Hennepin County, and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) met on February 24, 2014 to initiate a discussion and a fact finding effort on the potential of a Lake Minnetonka area state scenic byway; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the February 24, 2014 meeting, the attendees agreed to bring forward a discussion of the Lake Minnetonka area scenic byway concept to their respective cities and jurisdictions to determine if there was support for pursuing the initiative further; and WHEREAS, the attendees agreed to provide a response from their jurisdiction by June 1, 2014 on whether or not their jurisdiction was interested in further study of the feasibility of the Lake Minnetonka area state scenic byway; and WHEREAS, this response on further studying the feasibility of the state level scenic byway concept does not formally commit a jurisdiction to a potential state -level scenic byway application at this time; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the City Council supports the further study of the feasibility of the Lake Minnetonka area state scenic byway concept; and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVER, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota that the City Council recommends that a stewardship group of interested members from the above listed jurisdictions be created to further study the feasibility of the Lake Minnetonka area state scenic byway, and report back to all interested jurisdictions periodically with their findings. Adopted by the City Council this 22 "a day of April, 2014. ATTEST: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor 1.10 m F'A'hmgsa'�'s April 17, 2014 . �► Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 - Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bolton- menk.com Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE; 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements City Project Nos, PW- 14 -01, PW- 14 -02, PW -14 -08 Reject Bid and Authorize Rebid - Three Points Boulevard Dear Mayor and City Council Members: t. At the February 25, 2014 Council meeting, Resolution No. 14 -19 was passed approving plans and specifications and ordering advertisement for bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Project — Three Points Boulevard. Bids were received on April V and only one bid was received, that being from GMH Asphalt, Inc in the amount of $4,623,953.85. This bid amount is approximately 30% above the cost estimates for the project. We are recommending this bid be rejected. Since receiving the project bid, we have been working to understand the factors that led to the higher than anticipated bid price. Essentially, we have concluded there are four primary factors involved as follows: 1. The bidding climate is continuing to change with the trend being toward generally higher pricing as the economy continues to improve. 2. The affects of having to include Prevailing Wage provisions for all aspects of the project due to the requirements of Municipal State Aid (MSA). 3. The construction challenges associated with both the length and access needs of Three Points Boulevard coupled with the complexities of the utility construction in this area. 4. The originally specified construction time frame of one construction season. After evaluating the factors outlined above, we, along with City Staff have concluded there are more cost efficient ways to package the needed improvements from a bidding and contracting perspective. In addition, we are proposing to complete the overall project work over a period of two construction seasons versus one to provide more relaxed project schedules. Finally, we have also evaluated the improvements themselves for ways to reduce the project cost through reducing some of the proposed project work to the extent we feel possible. A summary of the recommended approach to these items is as follows: DESIGNING FOR A B- 814_TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer April 17, 2014 Page 2 Contracting and Construction Schedule Items: • Split Three Points Boulevard at Avocet Lane and repackage the improvements on Three Points Boulevard generally into "East" and "West" improvement packages. • Develop four separate bid packages, as shown on the attached Figure No. 1, to complete the required improvements over 2 -years as follows: • Project I: Bid the East Three Points Boulevard improvements in May /June as non -MSA for summer and fall 2014 construction with substantial completion by November of 2014. • Pro eet 2: Bid the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain improvements as a separate project in May /June for completion by fall of 2014. • Bid the West Three Points Boulevard improvements as two separate projects as follows: • Project 3: Bid by October of 2014 as a non -MSA Utility project to be completed by mid- summer of 2015. • Project 4. Bid early 2015 as a MSA Street improvement project to be completed by fall of 2015. By separating the projects as identified above, only the MSA street improvement project of the West Three Points Boulevard project (Project 4) will be subject to Prevailing Wage and other MSA provisions. Improvement Scope 1ilod3t?cadons: • Divide the work into less complex projects and provide longer construction time frames. • Bid the West Three Points Boulevard project (Project 3) utilizing `Venchless" techniques to minimize the traffic control costs for the Three Points area. • Remove the Commerce Boulevard forcemain improvement from the Three Points Boulevard project and plan on utilizing trenchless rehabilitation techniques on this pipe in the future. Based on the above, resolutions have been prepared for your consideration as follows: L Rejecting bid -2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project —Three Points Boulevard 2. Ordering preparation of bid documents and advertisement for bids for the East Three Points Boulevard project (Project 1). This project will be bid no later than June 2014. 3. Ordering preparation of bid documents and advertisement for bids for the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain project (Project 2). This project will be bid no later than June 2014. 4. Ordering preparation of bid documents and advertisement for bids for the West Three Points Utility project (Project 3). This project will be bid by October 2014. 5. Ordering preparation of bid documents and advertisement for bids for the West Three Points Street project (Project 4). This project will be bid early 2015. Sincerely, BOLTON & MEW WC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer no PROJECT 3 . SPRING/SUMMER 2015 PROJECT 4 - SUMMER/FALL 2015 1 2014 LEGEND: PROJECT 1: EAST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD PROJ ECT 2: BA RTLETT WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 3: WEST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD UTI UTY ® PROJECi<: WEST THREE POI NITS 80ULEVAflO STHEAI PROJECT 2 • SUMMER /FALL 2014 E301-.T®i-4 & Iuir=-NK, INC. Consulting Engineers & Surveyors MANOTu MN PAIPMONT,MN SLEE�YEYE,MN BURNSVIiIE,MN WILLMA0. AN CHASKA, MN RAMSEY. MN MAPLEWOOD, MN ..TER, MN RODIEFEP,MN AMES,A 5PENCER, IA PROJECTAREA.DWG i m U i C o uo 500 SrALE FEET CITY OF MOUND STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT AREAS APRIL 2014 FIGURE NO.1 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION REJECTING BID FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — THREE POINTS BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14 -19 adopted by the City Council the 251" day of February, 2014, fixed a date for the receipt of bids for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Three Points Boulevard from Commerce Boulevard to the east end; and WHEREAS, the bid date was set for April 1, 2014 and the advertisement for bids upon making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications was published in the official paper (Mound Laker) and the Finance and Commerce journal three weeks prior to the receipt of bids; and WHEREAS, there was only one bid received, that being from GMH Asphalt, Inc., Chaska, MN; and WHEREAS, the instructions to bidders for the Project and the bid specifications explicitly provide that the City reserves the right to reject any or all bids; and WHEREAS, the bid amount, including the "add" alternate Bartlett Watermain Improvements, of $4,623,953.85 was approximately 30% (percent) above the engineer's cost estimate; and WHEREAS, rejecting the only bid received from GMH Asphalt, Inc. that was approximately 30% above the engineer's estimate is in the best interests of the City of Mound; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, that the bid submitted by GMH Asphalt, Inc. for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project be rejected and the bid bond returned. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus -817- 1 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — EAST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Resolution 14 -19 approved the plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard and these plans and specifications can be split out into separate projects, with minor modifications; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14- adopted by the City Council the 22nd day of April, 2014, rejected the one bid received on April 151 for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Three Points Boulevard from Commerce Boulevard to the east end; and WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the project's utility construction, difficult access and length of the approved project, more contractor interest can be generated by splitting the project into two more manageable sections; and WHEREAS, the approved project will be split at Avocet Lane into an East Three Points Boulevard project and a West Three Points Boulevard project; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: 1. The approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project will be split into two separate projects and bid documents at the intersection of Avocet Lane/ Three Points Boulevard and these two projects will be referred to as the East Three Points Boulevard Project and the West Three Points Boulevard Project. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — East Three Points Boulevard. The advertisement shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk at which time they will be publically opened in a designated room within City Hall, 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be considered by the City Council at their next city council meeting in the council chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 5% of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus im CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE BARTLETT BOULEVARD WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, LOST LAKE BRIDGE TO WILSHIRE BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14 -20 adopted by the City Council the 251" day of February, 2014, authorized the preparation of plans and specifications and the advertisement for bids of the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvement Project as an optional addition to the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Three Points Boulevard; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14 -( ) adopted by the City Council on April 22, 2014, rejected the bid submitted for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to bid this project as a separate project at this time due to the severe deterioration of the existing watermain and the anticipated mill and overlay improvement to County Road 125 by Hennepin County sometime within approximately two years; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications for the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvement Project, Lost Lake Bridge to Wilshire Boulevard. The advertisement shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk at which time they will be pubiically opened in a designated room within City Hall, 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be considered by the City Council at their next city council meeting in the council chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 5% of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — WEST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD STREET AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, Resolution 14 -19 approved the plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard and these plans and specifications can be split out into separate projects, with minor modifications; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14 -( ) adopted by the City Council the 22nd day of April, 2014, rejected the one bid received on April 1st for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Three Points Boulevard from Commerce Boulevard to the east end; and WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the project's utility construction, difficult access and length of the approved project, more contractor interest can be generated by splitting the project into two more manageable sections; and WHEREAS, the approved project will be split at Avocet Lane into an East Three Points Boulevard project and a West Three Points Boulevard project; and WHEREAS, the necessary street and retaining wall improvements in the West Three Points Boulevard project can be more cost effectively constructed as a separate MSA improvement project; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota 1. The approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project will be split into two separate projects and bid documents at the intersection of Avocet Lane/ Three Points Boulevard and these two projects will be referred to as the East Three Points Boulevard Project and the West Three Points Boulevard Project. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — West Three Points Boulevard Street and Retaining Wall Improvement Project. The advertisement shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk at which time they will be publically opened in a designated room within City Hall, 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be considered by the City Council at their next city council meeting in the council chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 5% of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus 820 - 1 • : 0 !* • a RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — WEST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD -- Aii IMPROVEMENTS U -T I L- s T-A WHEREAS, Resolution 14 -19 approved the plans ana`sp6—Ri icatlons for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard and these plans and specifications can be split out into separate projects, with minor modifications; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14- adopted by the City Council the 22nd day of April, 2014, rejected the one bid received on April 16t for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Three Points Boulevard from Commerce Boulevard to the east end; and WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the project's utility construction, difficult access and length of the approved project, more contractor interest can be generated by splitting the project into two more manageable sections; and WHEREAS, the approved project will be split at Avocet Lane into an East Three Points Boulevard project and a West Three Points Boulevard project; and WHEREAS, the necessary street and retaining wall improvements in the West Three Points Boulevard project can be more cost effectively constructed as a separate MSA improvement project; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: 1. The approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project will be split into two separate projects and bid documents at the intersection of Avocet Lane/ Three Points Boulevard and these two projects will be referred to as the East Three Points Boulevard Project and the West Three Points Boulevard Project. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — WWTbree.Polnt �ouleyard Utility Improvement Project. The advertisement shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk at which time they will be publically opened in a designated room within City Hall, 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be considered by the City Council at their next city council meeting in the council chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 5% of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2014. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk REPLACEMENT PAGE - 821 — CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO, 14- RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — WEST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD STREET AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, Resolution 14 -19 approved the plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard and these plans and specifications can be split out into separate projects, with minor modifications; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14- adopted by the City Council the 22nd day of April, 2014, rejected the one bid received on April 1s' for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Three Points Boulevard from Commerce Boulevard to the east end; and WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the project's utility construction, difficult access and length of the approved project, more contractor interest can be generated by splitting the project into two more manageable sections; and WHEREAS, the approved project will be split at Avocet Lane into an East Three Points Boulevard project and a West Three Points Boulevard project; and WHEREAS, the necessary street and retaining wall improvements in the West Three Points Boulevard project can be more cost effectively constructed as a separate MSA improvement project; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: 1. The approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project will be split into two separate projects and bid documents at the intersection of Avocet Lane/ Three Points Boulevard and these two projects will be referred to as the East Three Points Boulevard Project and the West Three Points Boulevard Project. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — West Three Points Boulevard Utility Improvement Project. The advertisement shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk at which time they will be publically opened in a designated room within City Hall, 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be considered by the City Council at their next city council meeting in the council chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 5% of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus -821- 1 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director Date: April 17, 2014 Re: Action on Resolution Denying Board of Appeals and Adjustment Request from Allison Sisk Regarding the Keeping of Alpacas at 6221 Westedge Boulevard Summary. At its April 8, 2014 meeting, the City Council reviewed the Board of Appeals and Adjustment request from Allison Sisk that the keeping of (4) alpacas at her property at 6221 Westedge Boulevard should be allowed as they are companion animals similar to a pet dog. The City Council voted, 3 in favor and 2 opposed , to direct Staff to prepare a resolution denying the appeals request based on the City Council's reasons as discussed at the April 8`" meeting. A draft resolution has been prepared for consideration and action. Staff recommends approval. -822- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION TO DENY BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENT REQUEST FROM ALLISON SISK REGARDING THE KEEPING OF ALPACAS AT 6221 WESTEDGE BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the City received a report of llamas being kept at 6221 Westedge Boulevard. A site inspection was done by the Community Service Officer who confirmed there were alpacas present on the property; and WHEREAS, on December 13, 2013, the applicant, Allison Sisk, was notified by letter, that the keeping of alpacas at the property at 6221 Westedge Boulevard was not allowed under the provisions contained in City Code Section. 14.2. The letter also provided information about City Code Section 129 -32 (Appeals to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals) and appealing Staffs interpretation of the City Code; and WHEREAS, the applicant, on December 28, 2013, submitted a request in accordance with City Code Section. 129 -32 (Appeals to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments). Information from the applicant indicates there are four (4) neutered, male, alpacas presently on the property. She asserts that the keeping of alpacas at 6221 Westedge Boulevard should be allowed as they are companion animals and similar to a pet dog; and WHEREAS, the property located at 6221 Westedge Boulevard is zoned R -1 Single Family Residential and subject to the regulations contained in City Code Section 129- 100; and WHEREAS, the applicant's request was reviewed and processed pursuant to City Code Section 129 -32 (Appeals to the Board of Appeals and Adjustment); and WHEREAS, while the request is not for an interpretation of the zoning map or the regulations contained in City Code Section 129, the process contained in City Code Section 129 -32 was used as there are zoning and land use implications related to the use including, but not limited to, whether the keeping of alpacas is allowed in a residential district and compatibility and impacts of the keeping of alpacas upon adjacent uses; and WHEREAS, as set forth in City Code Section 129 -32, the Board of Appeals and Adjustment is the City Council; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -32 requires review of all appeals by the Planning Commission prior to review by the City Council; and WHEREAS, information regarding the request is included in the Staff Memorandum dated February 28, 2014 and the applicant's submitted materials; and -823- WHEREAS, based on its review of the regulations contained in the City Code and the applicant's request, Staff's conclusions were as follows: The keeping of alpacas is not listed as a permitted, conditional or accessory use in the R -1 zoning district as described in City Code Section 129 -99 Allowable uses (residential districts). 2. The keeping of alpacas is not allowed under the provisions contained in City Code Section 14 -2 of the City Code. Staff finds the alpacas to be similar to animals commonly found on a farm, such as cattle, horses, pigs, sheep or goats. 4. The keeping of alpacas is not allowed in any of Mound's residential zoning districts according to City Code Section 14 and City Code Section 129 with the exception of animals that were kept upon a premises prior to May 19, 1960 and then only the same or lesser number of such animals that existed at the time; and WHEREAS, the request was considered by the Planning Commission at its March 4, 2014 meeting; and WHEREAS, based on its review, the Planning Commission voted to recommend the City Council acknowledge Staff's conclusion that the current regulations do not allow for the keeping of alpacas but further recommended to the Council that the City's regulations be changed to allow for alpacas to be kept as pets as the Planning Commission viewed alpacas, in this context, to be similar to a companion animal as opposed to being livestock; and WHEREAS, the request was reviewed by the City Council at its April 8, 2014 meeting and on the question of whether the City Code allows for the keeping of alpacas in the City of Mound, the City Council, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment, voted three (3) in favor and two (2) opposed, and further directed Staff to prepare a resolution denying the appeals request based on information and reasons from the City's Council discussion that will be brought back to the next meeting for consideration; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the submitted appeals request was made within the timeframe established in Minnesota Statutes 15.99. MOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to deny the appeal to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, from Allison Sisk and find that the keeping of alpacas is not allowed under the regulations contained in the City Code. In denying the Board of Adjustment and Appeals request,the City Council hereby makes the following findings: Both Staff and the Planning Commission's evaluation of the request was that alpacas are not allowed under the Citv Code. -824- 2. Alpacas are not permitted under Chapter 14 of the City Code. 3. Alpacas are not permitted in the R -1 zoning district or any zoning district in Mound. 4. Alpacas are similar to animals commonly found on a farm, such as cattle, horses, pigs, sheep or goats. Farm animals are not permitted in the City of Mound. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk -825- Mayor Mark Hanus 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952 )472 -0604 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant DATE: April 15, 2014 SUBJECT: Urban Agriculture Study— Chicken and Bee Keeping Summary At its February 25, 2014 meeting, the City Council discussed the potential for allowing chickens and bees in residential districts. The discussion was prompted by residential interest and was a work program task of the Planning Commission in 2013. While the City Council determined that beekeeping was not appropriate for the community at this time, it did request additional information be provided at an upcoming meeting regarding the keeping of chickens. Staff contacted a number of communities which allow chickens through a permitting process including Anoka, Eagan, West St. Paul, Norwood Young America, and Rosemount. In general, the communities indicated that the keeping of chickens does not generate a lot of complaints. Some noted that there were more issues before there were regulations than after. One community stated that they found a number of people that were interested in chickens did not pursue permits for chickens once they participated in a mandatory class , which is a licensing requirement, and better understood what was involved in raising chickens. In addition to researching other communities' experiences, Staff has explored further how potential regulations would impact the ability of property owners to have chickens. The attached diagram was developed to explore whether there would be sufficient room for chickens if minimum coop setback requirements were established. The diagram was created for the minimum 6,000 square foot lot in the R -1A and R -2 districts assuming that the larger the property the easier it would be to place a coop. The diagram assumes coops will not be allowed in the yard setback areas. It also includes a 20 and 25 foot setback from residential structures on adjacent properties. Option 1 is assuming a lot of record, while Option 2 is assuming a standard lot. The diagrams indicate that the larger issue for property owners will likely be impervious surface requirements rather than setback requirements. Staff was also able to obtain a GIS file showing approximate building footprints. Please note that the data was collected from aerial imagery and so is not completely accurate for individual properties. However, it does provide another way of exploring the impact of setback regulations on the ability of residential properties to have chickens. The attached maps were created for sample neighborhoods in Three Points and on the Island. The maps show the amount of land that may be available to property owners if the City were to require a 25 foot coop setback from residential structures on adjacent property and a 50 foot setback from any public waters or wetlands. Additional maps from other neighborhoods in the City will be available at the meeting. The maps generally show that there still will be space available should coops be required to be placed at least 25 feet from residential buildings on adjacent properties. It should be noted that if setbacks from property lines are included in the regulations, the available area will be reduced from what is shown on the maps. Additional Information Staff was contacted by Tom Stokes on March 16th who advised that he has had chickens on his property for several years and would like the City Council to know that he is in favor of changing the regulations. A copy of his email has been included as an attachment. Staff also received a call from another resident, following the February 25th City Council meeting, who expressed support for allowing chickens in Mound. F-J'.A I i .' MUM .•v. ----- - - - --- ' ---- - - - - -- ---- o III III - - - - -- II i t i I i t 101 must h6 ing.. z� mes I I i I I i I i i Standard Lot Analysis Lot Area: 6,,000 sf 'total Allowed Impervious (30 %): 1,800 Sf House Footprint (including 18'x22'garage): 1,300 Sf Driveway: 400 Sf Walkway: 90 Sf Availiable Impervious Space for a Stationary Coop: 10 Sf Option 2: Wide Standard Lot & k \. / / { \f! 2 /, / {\) \kf` /` ƒ {\ )� k z � e ® U —co ICLO � v W � NF z Sarah Smith From: Sarah Smith Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:23 PM To: Sarah Smith Attachments: photo.JPG; ATT00001.txt - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Thomas Stokes [mailto:tstokesll@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:23 AM To: Sarah Smith Subject: Chickens Sara , I read the article in the laker concerning chickens . I must tell you that I have had chickens for several years in mound . Please see the attached photo of my coupe . I would suggest that the staff and council review a modern urban chicken coupe . Mine has automated heated watering system ,Semi automated feeders, skylights, automated chicken door and heat . Chickens make great pets and all have there own personality . They make a fraction of the noise and disturbance of my neighbors dogs . In fact I don't think most of my neighbors know I even have them . Those that do love them. If attended properly they have very little sent and there waste make great compost. My chickens supply eggs for 4 family's in our community . I could go on and on about the benefits of fresh eggs. The city of Minneapolis has much smaller yards and I know a number of people who have chickens . The idea that a large yard is required is just not true. I would welcome the staff and council to visit my coupe . I do believe that some limpets should be put on them such as no roosters and I would be happy to share my ideas . Thomas Stokes -831- 1 F k y +MV"v .k �: -, ,e t .. q M�. as � � x .. a.i9 •�VI( �. � .. ,. tq � a' > �... 1 ) �. j1 � ��� ; }♦ �.... '% s� i :` i ' . ,� i' �� 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant DATE: April 16, 2014 SUBJECT: Thrive MSP 2040 Projections As required by state statutes every 10 years, the Metropolitan Council is preparing its 2040 long -range plan, called Thrive MSP 2040. The vision, outcomes, and principles identified in this plan will drive the development of the Council's Transportation, Water Resources, Regional Parks, and Housing Policy Plans. These plans, to be released in late 2014 and early 2015, will establish the requirements Mound must meet in its next update of its Comprehensive Plan anticipated to be due in 2018. The entire 130 -page draft document is available on the Metropolitan Council's website at http: / /www.metrocouncii .ore /Planning /Projects /Thrive- 2040.aspx. The attached Table of Contents provides a good overview of the outcomes and principles of Thrive MSP 2040. The five outcomes (the "why ") identified are stewardship, prosperity, equity, livability, and sustainability, while the three principles (the "how ") identified are integration, collaboration, and accountability. in Thrive MSP 2040 the Metropolitan Council has further classified "Developed Areas" of the Twin Cities into urban centers, urban, suburban, and suburban edge. Mound has been placed in the suburban designation. The attached materials show how communities have been classified, how the Metropolitan Council describes the suburban designation, and the types of strategies anticipated for suburban communities. Of particular note in the identified list of suburban strategies is the requirement to plan for forecasted population and household growth at overall average densities of at least 5 units per area with targeted opportunities for more intensive development near regional transit investments. In the 2030 Regional Development Framework, the overall residential density minimum was 3 to 5 units per acre. Using the average lot sizes identified through the urban agriculture analysis earlier this year, the R -1 zoning district has an existing density of about 2.7 units per acre while the R -1A and R -2 zoning districts has about 4.6 units per acre. Using minimum lot size requirements, the R -1 zoning district would be about 4.4 units per acre and the R -1A and R -2 zoning districts about 7.3 units per acre. Staff has concerns about the implications of the requirement for a minimum of 5 units per acre, particularly since the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan must be in conformance with each other. -833- In addition to the preliminary Thrive MSP 2040 draft, the Metropolitan Council has also released population, household, and employment forecasts for individual communities. Preliminary forecasts for 2040 were first released in the fall of 2013. Like many communities, City Staff reviewed the forecasts and provided feedback to Metropolitan Council Staff. In general, the common themes heard from the Metropolitan Council were that the forecasts were too low for developing communities, while they were too high for developed communities that had limited land supplies. Based on that feedback, the Metropolitan Council Forecast Team made the following adjustments to the model: • Corrected data about residential land consumption rates • Refreshed projections of regional total households, population, and average household sizes, reducing the overall growth in households across the region • Revised development costs to include land values and increased costs of development • Stricter tracking of developed and available land supplies • Stricter definition of maximum land use capacities, in both rural and urban areas • Consideration of recent platting activity to identify current growth areas The table below summarizes the revised 2040 preliminary forecast for the City of Mound. For comparison purposes, the forecasts for 2020 and 2030 from the Regional Development Framework, which were incorporated into the last Comprehensive Plan, have been included. While it is helpful to know the anticipated increase from 2010, Staff has been primarily focused on the differences between the 2030 and 2040 forecasts, as it is this difference that will need to be accommodated in future land use plans in the next update of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Due the a continued reduction in the number of people per household, the City will need to plan for 200 additional households even though the projected number of people has been reduced by 400. As a primarily developed community the City of Mound must use redevelopment as a means to increase the number of households. In the City's 2010 Comprehensive Plan, household growth was projected to occur in the low density residential, medium density residential, pedestrian, destination and linear districts as shown in the table below. The total number of units for 2030 was projected to be accommodated through growth in these areas. From 2030 Comprehensive Plan Table 4.4 Anticipated Household Growth To accommodate the additional 200 units through 2040 the City will either need to increase the densities proposed for these districts or identify existing low or medium density residential neighborhoods for redevelopment to higher densities. To accommodate 200 additional units, the City would need to identify more than 28 acres of land at 7 units per acre, 16 acres of land at 12 units per acre, and 10 acres of land at 20 units per acre. Given the level of redevelopment already identified in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, City Staff has concerns about the ability to accommodate an additional 200 households in its 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Thus, City Staff recommends that the City send the attached letter to the Metropolitan Council to be included as part of the draft review process which concludes on April 28`h. -835- AThriving Region ....................................................................................... ............................... i Continued population and job growth through 2040 ................................. ............................... 1 Changes and challenges that lie ahead for our region ............................. ............................... 2 The opportunity of a regional approach .. .................. .. ...... ...................... . ....._....... ... .......... ..... 4 Thrive MSP 2040: Planning a prosperous, equitable, and livable region for today and generationsto come ................................................................................ ............................... 5 Thrive: Outcomes. .............. .................. ............ ...... ___ .............. ...... ... __ ................ 7 Stewardship......._ .................................................................................... ............................... 9 Responsibly managing finite natural resources.... ... .......... ................. ................... ....... 9 Pivoting from expanding to maintaining our region's wastewater and highway infrastructure .............................10 _ ......................................................................................... Leveraging transit infrastructure investments with higher expectations of land use,.. ......... 12 Prosperity................................................................................................. .............................13 Fostering the conditions for shared economic vitality by balancing major investments across theregion .............................................................................................. .............................14 Protecting natural resources that are the foundation of prosperity ......... .............................14 Planning for and investing in infrastructure, amenities and quality of life needed for economiccompetitiveness .................................................................... .............................15 Encouraging redevelopment and infill development across the region.. .............................18 Equity....................................................................................................... .............................19 Using our influence and investments to build a more equitable region .. .............................20 Expanding choices in where we live and how we travel for all our residents, across age, race and ethnicity, economic means, and ability ................................... .............................22 Investing in a mix of housing affordability along the region's transit corridors ..................... 23 Engaging a full cross - section of the community in decision - making ...... .............................23 Livability................................................................................................... .............................24 Increasing access to nature and outdoor recreation through regional parks and trails .......25 Providing housing and transportation choices for a range of demographic characteristics andeconomic means ............................................................................ .............................26 Supporting the region's bicycle and pedestrian facilities to promote bicycling for transportation, recreation and healthy lifestyles ..................................... .............................27 Aligning resources to support transit - oriented development and walkable places ..............28 Sustainability............................................................................................ .............................29 Promoting the wise use of water ........................................................... .............................29 Providing leadership to support climate change mitigation, adaptation and resilience ..... .,.30 Operating wastewater treatment and transit systems sustainably ......... .............................32 Thrive: Principles... .......... - .............. .......... ___ ............. .......... ... __ .... _ ....... ....... ..... _34 Integration................................................................................................ .............................35 Moving beyond organizational silos ....................................................... .............................35 Coordinating effectively with partners and stakeholders... - . .......... ............... ........... ....... .36 Collaboration............................................................................................ .............................37 Being open to shared strategies, supportive partnerships and reciprocal relationships... ... 37 Convening to address complex regional issues .................................... .............................37 Providing additional technical assistance and enhanced information to support local planning................................................................................................ .............................38 Accountability........................................................................................... .............................41 Adopting a data - driven approach to measure progress ......................... .............................41 Learningfrom indicators.... ............. .......... .... ____ ........... ........................ ........... ... 41 Providing clear, easily accessible information ....................................... .............................42 Deploying the Council's authority .......................................................... .............................42 SpecialFeatures .......................................................................................... .............................43 Applying policies to specific places: Moving beyond one size fits all ........ .............................43 Racially Concentrated Areas of Poverty and Areas of Concentrated Poverty ........................44 Station Areas on Existing and Planned Transitways ................................. .............................45 WaterSupply Considerations.., ..................... _ .................................................. .................. 46 Joband Activity Centers ........................................................................... .............................47 Wastewater Service Areas ....................................................................... .............................48 Regionally Significant Ecological Resources ............................................ .............................49 CommunityDesignations ............................................................................. .............................50 Urban and Rural Service Areas ................................................................ .............................50 Urban Center: Growing vitality in the region's core... ....... .......................... ..... 53 Urban: Redeveloping to meet the needs of new generations .................... .............................54 Suburban: Cultivating places where people can gather ............................ .............................55 Suburban Edge: Managing rapid growth and change ............................... .............................57 Emerging Suburban Edge: Transitioning from rural to developed ............ .............................58 Rural Centers: Serving the rural area as small town centers of commerce ............................60 Diversified Rural: Protecting land for rural lifestyles and long -term urbanization ....................61 Rural Residential: Limiting unsustainable growth patterns ........................ .............................63 Agricultural: Preserving large swaths of farmland ..................................... .............................64 LandUse Policies ........................................................................................ .............................65 Settingthe Stage ...................................................................................... .............................65 LandUse Policies ..................................................................................... .............................66 Orderly and Efficient Land Use ................................................................. .............................67 Natural Resources Protection ................................................................... .............................69 WaterSustainability .................................................................................. .............................72 Housing Affordability and Choice .............................................................. .............................75 Access, Mobility, and Transportation Choice ............................................ .............................77 EconomicCompetitiveness ....... ........................................... ......... .... - ....... .................... ....... 80 Buildingin Resilience.. ... ....................................................................... .............. ............... 81 Strategies for Community Designations ....................................................... .............................85 Urban Center: Growing vitality in the region's core .................................. .............................85 Urban: Redeveloping to meet the needs of new generations ................... .............................90 Suburban: Cultivating places where people can gather ........................... .............................95 Suburban Edge: Managing rapid growth and change .............................. .............................99 Emerging Suburban Edge: Transitioning from rural to developed ........... ............................103 Rural Centers: Serving the rural areas as small town centers of commerce .......................107 Diversified Rural: Protecting land for rural lifestyles and long -term urbanization .................110 Rural Residential: Limiting unsustainable growth patterns ...................... ............................114 Agricultural: Preserving large swaths of farmland .... ............................... ............................117 ImplementingThrive ..................................................... ............................... ............................121 Nextsteps ................................................................ ............................... ............................121 LocalPlanning Process ............................................ ............................... ............................121 TechnicalAssistance ................................................ ............................... ............................122 Sector Representative Program. .... ....................................... .............. ............. _ ... _122 Toolsand Resources ............... ................ ...... ... ........................... .... ................................ 122 Workshops............................................................ ............................... ............................122 PlanningGrants and Loans ................................... ............................... ............................122 Draft Local Forecasts....... ...................... __ _ ...... ... .. ... ...................... ........ 119 -837- Community Designation Rual Center 10 Urban Center Diversified Rural Mile, � Jancery 3, 2013 Urban Rural Residential Suburban fm Agricultural Suburban Edge Non Region Emerging Suburban Edge DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Last revised: February 26, 2014 52 -838- Suburban: a places where people can gather Suburban communities saw their primary era of development in the 1980s and into the early 1990s as the Baby Boomers formed families and entered their prime earning years. Many of these cities fall along freeway corridors and include growth along outside the 1- 694/494 beltway. This development pattern also reached and incorporated places that were once resort destinations connected from the Twin Cities by streetcar, such as communities along Lake Minnetonka, White Bear Lake, and the St. Croix River. Many of the region's corporate headquarters are — located in the Suburban Area. These include Thomson Reuters in Eagan, United Health Group in Minnetonka, and Land O'Lakes in Arden Hills. Development in Suburban communities occurred at significantly lower densities than in previous eras. Many residential subdivisions include cul -de -sacs. Retail areas often include big box stores and multi- tenant retail developments. Because of the automobile- orientation of this area's development patterns and high automobile ownership, walking or bicycling for daily travel is less common, but trails are often used for recreation and commuting. Suburban Area cities include some of the large regional parks such as Bunker Hills Regional Park in Coon Rapids and Andover, and Lebanon Hills Regional Park in Eagan and Apple Valley. Transit service is generally less cost - effective in the Suburban communities than in the Urban Center and Urban communities, but there is demand for express bus service from park- and -rides to regional destinations. As the Suburban communities have grown and as market preferences have evolved, many of these cities are now focusing attention on developing places where people can gather. These include town centers like downtown Stillwater, Burnsville's Heart of the City, Minnetonka's Village Center, downtown White Bear Lake, and Apple Valley's downtown. These locations are intended to be more walkable and include a mix of retail, higher density housing; and civic, institutional, and open space amenities. They often incorporate suburban transit circulator buses and park- and -rides for express service to downtown. Based on the draft forecasts and community designations shown here, the Suburban area would add approximately 152,000 residents, 72,000 households and 160,000 jobs between 2010 and 2040. This represents growth of 22 percent in population, 27 percent in households and 45 percent in employment over the three decades. These numbers are approximations, provided for general illustration only. They will change somewhat during the upcoming fine - grained comprehensive planning process. Based on the draft forecasts and community designations shown here, the Suburban area will add 152,000 residents, 72,000 households and 160,000 jobs between 2010 and 2040. This represents growth of 22 percent in population, 27 percent in households and 45 percent in DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Last revised: February 26, 2014 611 employment over the three decades. These numbers are approximations, provided for general illustration only, and may change during the upcoming comprehensive planning process. Designated Suburban communities are: Apple Valley, Arden Hills, Bayport, Birchwood Village, Brooklyn Park, Burnsville, Champlin, Circle Pines, Coon Rapids, Deephaven, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Excelsior, Gem Lake, Greenwood, Landfall, Lexington, Lilydale, Little Canada, Long Lake, Loretto, Mahtomedi, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake, Mendota, Mendota Heights, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Mound, Mounds View, North Oaks *, Oak Park Heights, Oakdale, Shoreview, Shorewood, Spring Lake Park, Spring Park, St. Bonifacius, Stillwater, Stillwater Township *, Tonka Bay, Vadnais Heights, Wayzata, White Bear Lake, White Bear Township, Willernie, and Woodland. *listed in this designation but also has areas in other designations. DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Last revised: February 26, 2014 I FY's Suburban: r places where people can gather Suburban communities saw their primary era of development during the 1980s and early 1990s as the Baby Boomers formed families and entered their prime earning years. Suburban Communities also includes places that were once resort destinations connected from the Twin Cities by streetcar, along Lake Minnetonka, White Bear Lake, and the St. Croix River. Orderly and Efficient Land Use Council Role • Maintain and improve regional infrastructure to support adaptive reuse, infill development, and redevelopment. • Support local planning and implementation efforts to target growth in and around regional transit, as articulated in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. • Coordinate regional infrastructure and program funding with other efforts designed to address racially concentrated areas of poverty. • Provide technical assistance to communities undertaking planning efforts around job and activity centers and regional investments. • Partner with local communities to improve land use patterns to reduce the generation of carbon emissions. Community Role • Plan for forecasted population and household growth at overall average densities of at least 5 units per acre, and target opportunities for more intensive development near regional transit investments, at densities and in a manner articulated in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. • Identify areas for redevelopment, particularly areas that are well - served by transportation options and nearby amenities, and which contribute to better proximity between jobs and housing. Lead major redevelopment efforts. • Lead detailed land use planning efforts around regional transit stations, job and activity centers, and other regional investments. • Plan for and program local infrastructure needs (e.g., roads, sidewalks, sewer, water, surface water), including those needed to accommodate future growth and implement local comprehensive plans. • Consider the role of railroads in promoting economic activity and identify an adequate supply of land in comprehensive plans to meet existing and future demand for users requiring rail access. Natural Resources Protection Council Role • Support the reclamation of lands, including contaminated land, for redevelopment and the restoration of natural features and function. DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Last revised: February 26, 2014 95 -841- Promote multi -modal access to regional parks, trails and the transit network, where appropriate. Support the continued development of the regional trail system. Community Role • Integrate natural resource conservation and restoration strategies into comprehensive plan. • Identify lands for reclamation, including contaminated land, for redevelopment and the restoration of natural features and functions. • Integrate natural resources restoration and protection strategies into local development ordinances. • Develop programs that encourage the implementation of natural resource conservation and restoration. Water Sustainability Council Role See Water Sustainability policy discussion in the Land Use Policy introduction. Community Role ® Implement best management practices to control and treat stormwater as redevelopment opportunities arise. Housing Affordability and Choice Council Role Re- invest in and expand regional systems to support redevelopment in communities that partner in the preservation and expansion of housing choices. Community Role • Designate land in the comprehensive plan to support household growth forecasts and address the community's share of the region's affordable housing need through redevelopment at a range of densities. • Plan for an adequate supply of affordable housing along regional transitways at station areas. Address the relationship of local industries to the affordability of housing in the community. • Use state, regional, and federal sources of funding and /or financing and development tools allowed by state law to assist the feasibility of the development of new lifecycle and affordable housing. • Develop or use programs to preserve the existing stock of naturally - occurring affordable housing. DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Last revised: February 26, 2014 3.1 Access, Mobility, and Transportation Choice Council Role • Ensure that local roadway systems are planned in ways that minimize short trips on the regional highway system. • Ensure that local infrastructure and land uses are planned in ways that are consistent with managing access along the regional highway system and capitalizing on investments in the regional transit system. • Invest in transit improvements in corridors that serve existing transit demand and that can effectively guide a significant level of future growth. • Ensure that local comprehensive plans guide growth in and around transit stations and near high - frequency transit services, commensurate with planned levels of transit service and station typologies identified in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. • Provide regional transit services to serve dense corridors and nodes where local communities are adapting local policies to improve the success of transit. • Support access to, and the future growth of, regional intermodal freight terminals as identified in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. Community Role • Develop comprehensive plans that focus growth in and around regional transit stations and near high- frequency transit services, commensurate with planned levels of transit service and the station typologies (e.g., land use mix, density levels) identified in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. • Develop local policies, plans, and practices that improve pedestrian and bicycle circulation, including access to regional transit services, regional trails, and regional bicycle corridors. • Seek opportunities to improve local street and pedestrian connections to improve access for local trips. • Consider implementation of travel demand management (TDM) policies and ordinances that encourage use of travel options and decrease reliance on single- occupancy vehicle travel. • Engage private sector stakeholders that depend on or are affected by the local transportation system. • Adopt development requirements that improve the user experience, circulation, and access for bicyclists and pedestrians. • Adopt complete streets policies that improve safety and mobility for all road users. Economic Competitiveness Council Role • Invest in regional amenities and services, including transit, regional parks and trails and bikeways to support the Suburban area as an attractive place to locate and do business. DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Last revised: February 26, 2014 S7 Invest in regional transportation improvements that better connect workers in racially concentrated areas of poverty with job training and living wage employment. Community Role • Identify appropriate areas for business and industrial expansion, considering access by rail, truck, plane, and barge. • Support the cleanup and re -use of contaminated land by utilizing regional, county, and local funding programs and financing tools. • Preserve, remediate contamination, and re- purpose industrial base for higher intensity employment and new industries. • Protect sites for river- and rail - dependent manufacturing and freight transportation needs from incompatible uses and identify local land supply and transportation needs for effective use of those sites. • Plan for land uses where appropriate that support the growth of export- oriented businesses, important regional economic clusters, and living wage jobs. • Conduct small area planning efforts to preserve locations for employment, manage growth, and minimize land use conflicts. Building in Resilience Council Role Invest in regional transportation infrastructure and services that increase the share of trips made by transit, carpools, and non - motorized means and guide development patterns that support this. . Explore developing an urban forestry assistance program. Community Role • Identify and address potential vulnerabilities in local infrastructure as a result of increased frequency and severity of storms and heat waves. • Participate in federal, state, and local utility programs that incentivize the implementation of wind and solar power generation. • Consider making a property assessed clean energy (PACE) program available for conservation and renewable energy. • Consider subscribing to community solar gardens for municipal electric load, or providing sites for gardens. • Adopt local policies and ordinances that encourage land development that supports travel demand management (TDM) and use of travel options. • Consider development standards that increase vegetative cover and increase the solar reflective quality of surfaces. • Participate in urban forestry grant programs as available. DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Last revised: February 26, 2014 ;.. M April _ 2014 Ms. Susan Haigh Thrive MSP 2040 Metropolitan Council 390 N. Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Dear Ms. Haigh, As a fully developed community, the City of Mound is concerned about the level of growth projected for our community in Thrive MSP 2040 and the proposed increased expectation of an average residential density of 5 units per acre for a suburban community as the 2030 Regional Framework included an expectation of 3 units per acre. The City of Mound is one of the more affordable, urban communities around lake Minnetonka. The City continues to seek a balance between accommodating its fair share of regional growth and the protection of the valuable natural water resource that is integral to the community's character. The City of Mound already has relatively small lots sizes with more than half of the City's single - family residential lots being zoned with a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. In addition, in its 2030 Comprehensive Plan the City designated much of its downtown core for mixed- used development with medium and high density residential. As the community looks to 2040, there are concerns about where additional household growth and density can be accommodated. The community is nearly fully developed with generally only small, infill lots remaining for development. The City has already designated a large part of its downtown area to mixed use development with medium and high density residential. As part of its 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the City designated a sufficient amount of land to accommodate a more than 20% increase in households from 2010. This level of growth is significant given that the number of households in the City only grew by 7% between 1990 and 2000 and went down slightly between 2000 and 2010. The City anticipates that accommodating another 4% growth in household will be challenging given the lack of undeveloped sites and few remaining sites appropriate for redevelopment. The City of Mound continues to be supportive of diversifying its housing options and providing its fair share of regional housing needs. As a developed community, however, there are significant local implications for accommodating additional household growth when there are no undeveloped or redevelopment areas available. We encourage the Metropolitan Council to recognize and take into consideration local conditions as it establishes requirements for individual communities. We also encourage the development of strategies that can support communities as they attempt to meet regional housing demand. Sincerely, Kandis Hanson, City Manager Harbor Wine & Spirits March 2014 Cate Weather 3/1/2014 ovrcast 05 3/2/2014 3/3/2014 overcast-5 3/412014 overcast 20 3/5/2014 overcast 28 3/6. %20'4 overcast 26 3/7/X4.4 overcast 30 3/8/20'4 pt sun 33 3!Q 20? 4 3/1;2014 sun 53 3/11/?C '4 SUN 47 3/12,`' ^_'.4 sun 25 3/117C "4 sun 32 overcast 40 3/16/20 "4 overcast hi 20s g;.7;r'r.-4 pt sun 32 311.":- - -' 4 wet snw It 28 31': r l'C' 4 ovrcast 35 sun 40 overcast 40 3/21 4 sun 30s 3i2. 2C `4 4 ovrest 20 ' -'4 sun 20 4 windy 30S ^ ^ - . '4 rain /snow ovrest30s 2, "4 sun 40s i:.._ _ Cust 14 Cust 13 Variance 2014 2013 Difference +/- Cash +/- 501 527 -26 13668.95 13305.15 -0.09 572 -572 0.03 14833.47 271 -0.26 271 5997.44 0.25 277 235 42 6020.6 4735.57 255 281 -26 5658.82 5559.27 275 229 46 6902.99 4460.53 483 248 235 12522.03 4907.54 509 506 3 13994.1 11757.64 508 -508 11584.6 270 270 5264.31 308 262 46 7942.2 4860.28 253 266 -13 6071.83 4802.67 267 253 14 5401.71 5536.42 540 277 263 14020.73 5925.17 514 503 11 13592.69 11244.93 545 -545 13436.73 297 297 5426.04 255 206 49 5510.11 3706.43 248 244 4 4718 4771.18 251 206 45 4622.02 4321.48 461 237 224 10965.79 4498.75 496 482 14 11053.41 10931.56 447 -447 10105.6 238 238 4865 281 227 54 5432.82 4383.42 244 262 -18 5209.67 5761.74 257 246 11 4867.78 4581.46 532 274 258 13777.91 6130.69 553 551 2 13179.76 13533.75 643 -643 17893.78 263 263 4745.44 9237 -138 211432.2 207569.8 :- 363.80 1.06 5997.44 0.99 1285.03 -0.09 99.55 0.03 2442.46 -0.26 7614.49 0.25 2236.46 -1.74 5264.31 3081.92 1269.16 - 134.71 8095.56 2347.76 5426.04 1803.68 -53.18 300.54 6467.04 121.85 -0.67 1.69 0 0.03 -0.12 -0.07 -1.17 -0.5 0.38 0.14 0.07 -1.88 4865.00 0.02 1049.40 -4.37 - 552.07 -0.5 286.32 0 7647.22 015 - 353.99 -0.9 4745.44 3862.40 C� 0.39 -6.97 ,4avty Stark From: toddlynnepeterson @frontiernet.net Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 7:06 AM To: Amy Stark Subject: Re: POSC - Open Meetings Amy, with my work schedule, I want to resign from the POSC. I just can not make the meetings. Thanks, Todd Peterson PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 13, 2014 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page Open meeting Pledge of Allegiance Approve agenda, with any amendments Mayor Mark Harms with "Mayor for the Day" Proclamations A. Proclamation Naming Rachel Christensen as "Deputy Mayor for a Day" 849 in the City of Mound, Minnesota B. Proclamation Naming Seth Anderson as "Deputy Mayor for a Day" in 850 the City of Mound, Minnesota C. Proclamation Naming Lily Hames as "Mayor for a Day" in the City of 851 Mound, Minnesota 5. *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims 852 -881 *B. Approve minutes: Apr 22, 2014 . regular meeting 882 -890 *C. Approve Fire Inspection Permit for Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church 891 — The Blast: Sat, May 17, 2014, with fees paid *D. Approve permit for Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for the Northwest 892 Tonka Lions -- WeCAN Fundraising Event, May 16, 2014 *E. Approve Resolution Approving Variances for 1728 Finch Lane, 893 -916 PID #13- 117 -24 -13 -0018 *F. Approve an Ordinance Amending Appendix A of the Mound City Code as it 917 -918 Relates to Electric and Gas Franchise Fees *G. Approve a Resolution Authorizing Publication of an Ordinance by Title and Summary 919 *H. Cancel Special Meeting Workshop for the purpose of receiving a Concept Plan for Assisted Living Facility by Trident Development: May 20, 2014, 7:00 PM *I. Set Special Meeting Workshop for the purpose of receiving Developer Day Summary: June 17, 2014, 6:30 PM PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 6. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker) 7. Kari Kamrath and Rob Winge, County Assessors, with 2014 Hennepin County 920 -940 Assessment and Board of Appeal and Equalization Report from May 7, 2014 (Please refer to the Hennepin County Assessors 2014 Mound Sales Book that was sent electronically with the April 8, 2014 Agenda Packet, which is also on file at City Hall.) 8. Jim Reuper, Phelps Bay Captain for the Lake Minnetonka Association, requesting contributions for the treatment of Phelps Bay 9. Rita Trapp, consultant with Hoisington - Koegler, Inc, requesting discussion on Concept 941 -956 Plan/Sketch Plan Review of proposed 3 -lot major subdivision near the intersection of Fairfield Road, Meadow Lane and Leach Lane. Applicant: Kent Friedrichsen 10. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer,requesting discussion/action on 957 -970 a Liquor License Applications from Stephani Boyum and Paul Boyum for Cattails Kitchen and Cocktails, LLC (Also see separate packet.) A. On -Sale Liquor B. Sunday Liquor 11, Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer, requesting action on a Resolution 971 -976 Approving a Premises Permit Application for Gambling at Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails, LLC 12. Kandis Hanson, City Manager, requesting discussion/action on an Ordinance Amending Chapter 50 of the Mound City Code as it relates to Parks and Recreation prohibiting private business on public lands or waters within the municipal boundaries of Mound 13. Closed Meeting for the purpose of performance evaluation of Kandis Hanson, City Manager (Closed at City Manager's option. See separate packet.) 14. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: Planning Commission: Mar 4, 2014 C. Reports: Mound Fire Department Fire Commission Meeting Agenda: May 7, 2014 Strathmore's Who's Who Honors Kandis Hanson D. Correspondence: Letter from Hennepin County on Community Development Block Grant Program: Apr 18, 2014 Email from Chief Farniok on Successful Explorers Competition: May 1, 2014 Letter from Westonka Historical Society, requesting volunteers Letter from Mediacom on channel lineup: May 1, 2014 Minnetrista/Mound Clean Up Day: May 10, 2014 Hennepin County Collection Events 15. Adjourn 977 -979 980 -983 984 -999 1000 1001 -1002 1003 -1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 -1009 Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas maybe viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: unww. oln »o!�nd�enln PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY OF MOUND PROCLAMATION NAMING RACHEL CHRISTENSEN AS "DEPUTY MAYOR FOR A DAY" IN THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, Grandview Middle School 6`h grade government class met with the Mayor of Mound on April 18, 2014, to talk about the role of local government and the role of the Mayor; and WHEREAS, a project was undertaken by each student to write an essay on what they would do to improve their city if they were the Mayor; and WHEREAS, a winner from each of the three classes were determined based on their ideas, their insight, and their depth of thought; and WHEREAS, all the essays will be made available to the City of Mound for review and consideration of the ideas and thoughts expressed; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound wishes to publically recognize the top essays; and WHEREAS, Rachel Christensen has been selected among top essayists in her class and second overall of the three Grandview classes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that Rachel Christensen is the distinguished recipient of the award of "Deputy Mayor for a Day" in the City of Mound. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche Mayor Mark Hanus PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY OF MOUND PROCLAMATION NAMING SETH ANDERSON AS "DEPUTY MAYOR FOR A DAY" IN THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, Grandview Middle School 6th grade government class met with the Mayor of Mound on April 18, 2014, to talk about the role of local government and the role of the Mayor; and WHEREAS, a project was undertaken by each student to write an essay on what they would do to improve their city if they were the Mayor; and WHEREAS, a winner from each of the three classes were determined based on their ideas, their insight, and their depth of thought; and WHEREAS, all the essays will be made available to the City of Mound for review and consideration of the ideas and thoughts expressed; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound wishes to publically recognize the top essays; and WHEREAS, Seth Anderson has been selected among top essayists in his class and second overall of the three Grandview classes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that Seth Anderson is the distinguished recipient of the award of "Deputy Mayor for a Day" in the City of Mound. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche 1 Mayor Mark Hanus PROCLAMATION OF THE CITY OF MOUND PROCLAMATION NAMING LILY HAMES AS "MAYOR FOR A DAY" IN THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, Grandview Middle School 6th grade government class met with the Mayor of Mound on April 18, 2014, to talk about the role of local government and the role of the Mayor; and WHEREAS, a project was undertaken by each student to write an essay on what they would do to improve their city if they were the Mayor; and WHEREAS, a winner from each of the three classes were determined based on their ideas, their insight, and their depth of thought; and WHEREAS, all the essays will be made available to the City of Mound for review and consideration of the ideas and thoughts expressed; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound wishes to publically recognize the top essays; and WHEREAS, Lily Hames has been named as the top essayist of the three Grandview classes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that Lily Hames is the distinguished recipient of the award of "Mayor for a Day" in the City of Mound. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche ME Mayor Mark Hanus City of Mound Claims as of 05 -13 -1 YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT 2014 PSTGCONTACT $ 941.22 2014 APRIL14 -ELAN $ 31823.31 2014 03- 14KENGRAV $ 11749.24 2014 0502CITYMAN $ 23,339.62 2014 051314CITY $ 125,291.88 2014 051314HWS $ 116,049.49 �TA ( 271,194.7 CITY OF MOUND 04/30/149:24 AM _.._. ..� ..� Page 1 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2014 ..i Batch Name PSTGCONTACT User Dollar Amt $941.22 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $941.22 Refer 1 POSTMASTER Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -322 Postage Invoice 04302014 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 4/25/2014 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND $0.00 In Balance POSTAGE CITY CONTACT NEWSLETTER SPRING 2014 - 8 PGS 5,670 PIECES Wells Fargo 10100 Total 10100 Wells Fargo $941.22 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $941.22 Total $941.22 $941.22 -853- $941.22 $941.22 CITY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: April 2014 Batch Name APRILI4 -ELAN User DollarAmt $3,823.31 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,823.31 $0.00 In Balance Refer-5—ELAN CREDIT CARD _ Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -431 Meeting Expense PARKING -ST PAUL CAPITAL- K. HANSON & S. SMITH- LOBBY FOR TIF Invoice 04232014 3/13/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 04232014 3/23/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 04232014 3/27/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 04232014 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 04232014 411/2014 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 04232014 3/5/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 04232014 3/7/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -455 Permits Invoice 04232014 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 04232014 3/7/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 04232014 3/25/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 04232014 411/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 04232014 4/1/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 04232014 3/20/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 04232014 3/1512014 Cash Payment E 22242260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 04232014 3117/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 04232014 3/1812014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 04232014 3/1912014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 04232014 3/20/2014 OFFICE MAX- 90# CARD STOCK FOR SIGNAGE- HWS ENGRAVED CLOCK PLANNING COMMISSIONER -S. WARD RETIREMENT GRANDVIEW LODGE NISSWA MN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC CONF 5 -7 & 5 -8 -14 C. MOORE Project 14 -3 MN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC CONFERENCE 5- 7 & 5 -8 -14 C. MOORE Project 14 -3 RURAL WATER CONF MEALS - 3- 12 -14 -R. HANSON, D ERVIN, S. KIVISTO MGMT SEMINAR - HAMLINE U- B. BUNN Project 14 -5 UTILITY PERMIT HENNEP CTY 4 -3 -14 WATERMAIN BREAK MGMT SEMINAR - HAMLINE U- B. SWARTZER Project 14 -5 NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CUMMINS TRUCK PARK #195 MN RURAL WATER MEMBERSHIP DUES 2014 MN RURAL WATER MEMBERSHIP DUES 2014 INTL FIRE CHIEFS CONF REG. G. PEDERSON AUG 13 -16 TX AMAZON.COM- 2 PHONE CAR CHARGERS, LAPTOP BATTERY AMAZON.COM- POWER SUPPLY CORD FAMILY TIES- TRAINING VIDEOS TO DVD SEARS.COM MEN'S WORKBOOT- G. PEDERSON CARBONES PIZZA- LUNCH STANDBY CREW FROM 1A'AT� -TOWN 3 -20 -14 -854- 05/05/14 9:17 AM Page 1 $6.00 $16.40 $59.90 $380.88 $235.00 $14.27 $575.00 $215.00 $575.00 $159.51 $112.50 $112.50 $425.00 $67.84 $9.30 $133.58 $44.99 $53.35 i CITY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments 05/05/14 9:17 AM Page 2 Current Period: April 2014 .. F?`s,� Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -217 Fire Prevention Supplies Invoice 04232014 3/21/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -401 Building Repairs Invoice 04232014 4/1/2014 Transaction Date 4/2412014 Fund Summary GARRETT SPECIALTIES - BANDAGE MATE $493.75 MPLS GLASS - DISPLAY CASE $133.54 REPLACEMENT GLASS Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,823.31 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $65.90 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $1.,361.35 601 WATER FUND $341.77 602 SEWER FUND $2,037.89 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $16.40 $3,823.31 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,823.31 Total $3,823.31 -855- CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Batch Name 03- 14KENGRAV User Dollar Amt $1,749.24 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $1,749.24 $0.00 In Balance Refer 62 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -300 Professional Srvs ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 2014 Invoice 119844 4/29/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23283 VERIZON WIRELESS -TOW VERIZON SITE CHANGES LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2014 Invoice 119844 4/29/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -316 Legal P & I PLANNING LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 2014 Invoice 119844 4/29/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23296 FRIEDRICHSON - FAIRFIELD 5913 FAIRFIELD RD FRIEDRICHSEN LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 2014 Invoice 119844 4/29/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23291 BOYUM- 2544COMMERCE -P 2544 COMMERCE - BOYUM LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2014 Invoice 119844 4/29/2014 Transaction Date 517/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 63 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Cash Payment E 475- 46386 -300 Professional Srvs 2014 TIF 1 -3 SPECIAL LEGISLATION -LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2014 Invoice 119674 3/31/2014 Cash Payment E 475 - 46386 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 119674 3/31/2014 Transaction Date 517/2014 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 475 TIF 1 -3 Mound Harbor Renaissan AUDITOR'S RD LAND PURCHASES /BECKEL - LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 10100 Wells Fargo $1,406.24 $343.00 $1,749.24 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $1,749.24 Total $1,749.24 S 05/08/14 7:59 AM Page 1 $698.24 $90.00 $450.00 $60.00 $108.00 $1,406.24 $175.00 $168.00 $343.00 CITY OF MOUND 05/02/1411: 00 AM Page Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Batch Name 0502CITYMAN User Dollar Amt $23,339.62 Payments Computer DollarAmt $23,339.62 $0.00 In Balance Refer 7 BENZ, BERNIE _ Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT -5075 $242.65 WINDSOR RD- R. EMMER Invoice 04292014 4/23/2014 4/2012014 Transaction Date 4/25/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total - -- Refer 1 BOOM ISLAND BREWING COMPAN _- Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1820 2/24/2014 REIMB MILEAGE C. MOORE- Transaction Date 4125/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 10 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 2 -20 -14 THRU 3- Cash Payment 20-14 Invoice 4191878 4/20/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41920 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 2 -20 -14 THRU 3- 20-14 Invoice 4191878 4/2012014 Transaction Date 412912014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 2 MILLER PROPERTY SERVICES Refer 8 MOORE, CARLTON _Refer Cash Payment R 281 - 45210 -34737 Villa Slip Revenue REFUND CHANGE FROM LLS TO REG Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training REIMB MILEAGE C. MOORE- DOCK- MILLER Invoice 04292014 4/21/2014 Cash Payment G 281 -22823 Shoreline /Dock Maint Escrow REFUND CHANGE FROM LLS TO REG Invoice 04292014 4/17/2014 DOCK- MILLER Invoice 04292014 4/21/2014 Cash Payment G 281 -22822 Channel Maintenance Escro REFUND CHANGE FROM LLS TO REG $27.55 DOCK- MILLER Invoice 04292014 4/21/2014 Cash Payment G 281 -22821 Slip Maintenance Escrow Invoice 04292014 4121/2014 Cash Payment G 281 -22000 Deposits Invoice 04292014 4/21/2014 Cash Payment R 281- 45210 -34705 LMCD Fees Invoice 04292014 4/21/2014 Cash Payment R 281 - 45210 -34725 Dock Permits Invoice 04292014 4121/2014 Cash Payment R281-45210-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND CHANGE FROM LLS TO REG DOCK- MILLER Total REFUND LOST LAKE KEY DEPOSIT- MILLER REFUND CHANGE FROM LLS TO REG DOCK- MILLER REGULAR DOCK FEE- MILLER CHANGE FROM LLS LMCD FEE- REG DOCK - MILLER CHANGE FROM LLS $242.65 $188.00 $188.00 $184.24 $552.71 $736.95 $1,602.00 $132.00 $132.00 $84.00 $50.00 $18.75 - $325.00 -$7.50 Invoice 04292014 4/21/2014 Transaction Date 4/25/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,686.25 Refer 8 MOORE, CARLTON Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training REIMB MILEAGE C. MOORE- LMCIT WKSHP $27.55 4 -16 -14 BROOKLYN PARK Invoice 04292014 4/17/2014 Project 14 -4 Transaction Date 4/25/2014 Wells Fa- 857_ 10100 Total $27.55 CITY OF MOUND 05/02/1411:00 AM Page 2 Payments ",'STY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 _ _Refer 9 MYERS, TONY Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -434 Conference & Training REIMB T. MYERS -MN IAAI CONF MEALS 3 -26 THRU 3 -28 -14 Invoice 04292014 4/29/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 04292014 4/29/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -434 Conference & Training REIMB T. MYERS -MN IAAI CONF LODGING 3- 26 THRU 3 -28 -14 REIMB T. MYERS -MN IAAI CONF TRANSPORTATION 3 -26 THRU 3 -28 -14 Invoice 04292014 4129/2014 Transaction Date 4/29/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total - -- Refer - -- 6 TITLE SMART INC. Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT -5950 HAWTHORNE RD- C. HUMPHREY Invoice 04292014 4/23/2014 Transaction Date 4/25/2014 A u Wells Fargo 10100 Total — ,� — 1111. . - „�. -_.. ...... Refer 4 VERIZON WIRELESS _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -321 Telephone & Cells DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 4 -11 -14 THRU 5 -10 -2014 Invoice 9723285062 4/10/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9723285062 4/1012014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9723285062 4110/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9723285062 4/10/2014 Transaction Date 4/2512014 Reefer 3 VERIZON WIRELESS Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9723471349 4/13/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -13100 Due From Other Funds Invoice 9723471349 4/13/201.4 Cash Payment G 101 -22816 Personal Cell Phone Invoice 9723471349 4/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9723471349 4/13/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9723471349 4/13/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9723471349 4113/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -321 Telephone & Cells DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 4 -11 -14 THRU 5 -10 -2014 DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 4 -11 -14 THRU 5 -10 -2014 DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 4 -11 -14 THRU 5 -10 -2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- 2014 CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- 2014 CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- 2014 CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- 2014 CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- 2014 CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- 2014 CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- 2014 Invoice 9723471349 4/1312014 _858_ $115.00 $184.18 $71.68 $370.86 $111.09 $111.09 $67.75 $67.75 $67.75 $203.23 $406.48 $31.05 $31.07 $0.00 $93.12 $94.77 $93.12 $18.86 CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND 05102/14 11:00 AM Page 3 Current Period: May 2014 .. ,. -- .. ] a.. , ..1 w§ k �,, h15R�S.T.'neU 1 ,. � - .. 7. _ ,1S x .a., w , .. ✓.,. ;, .a ., .... „. - Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -321 Telephone & Celts CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- $123.89 2014 Invoice 9723471349 4/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9723471349 4/1312014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9723471349 4/13/2014 Transaction Date 4/25/2014 Refer XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 408663086 4/14/214 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 408663086 4/14/214 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 408663086 4/14/214 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 408663086 4/14/214 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 408663086 4/14/214 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 408663086 4/14/214 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 408663086 4/14/214 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 408663086 4/14/214 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 408663086 4/14/214 Cash Payment E 285- 46388 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 408663086 4/141214 Cash Payment E 101- 42115 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 408663086 4/14/214 Transaction Date 4/2512014 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 285 MOUND HRA 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- $50.44 2014 CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- $13.16 2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $549.48 ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $124.28 ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3130/14 DEPOT $62.66 BLDG ELECTRIC SVC - 2127/14 TO 3/30/14 $3,747.52 ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $2,003.54 ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27114 TO 3/30/14 $4,373.02 ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $1,358.74 ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $1,962.35 ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $1,962.35 ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $822.67 ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $2,558.22 ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3130/14 $44.96 Wells Fargo 10100 Wells Fargo $5,989.35 $2,733.84 $1,686.25 $2,558.22 $4,889.28 $3,935.94 $1,546.74 $23,339.62 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $23,339.62 Total $23,339.62 _859_ 10100 Total $19,020.31 CITY OF MOUND 05108/14 1:37 PM Page 1 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Batch Name 051314CITY User Dollar Amt $125,291.88 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $125,291.88 $0.00 In Balance Refer 58 3D SPECIALTIES _ Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms RAINCOAT & RAINPANT LIME -XL- PARKS $333.87 Invoice 445143 5/2/2014 Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $333.87 Refer m 65 ACTIONFLEET, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair STROBE TUBE ASSEMBLY- LIGHT TRIM $297.70 RING- TRUCK #22 Invoice 404301 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $297.70 Refer 66 AMCON _ Cash Payment E 222-42260 -325 Pagers -Fire Dept. 4 MINITOR VOICE PAGERS W/ CHARGERS, $2,105.00 WARRANTIES & PROGRAMMING KITS Invoice 44483 4/10/2014 PO 24291 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -325 Pagers -Fire Dept. 3 TRAVEL CHARGERS $294.50 Invoice 44644 4/15/2014 PO 24401 Transaction Date 517/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,399.50 Refer 64 ASPEN EMBROIDERY AND DESIG���ry Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies 22 SWEATSHIRTS AND SCREEN PRINTING- $337.38 FIREMEN Invoice 05132014 4/2912014 Transaction Date 5/712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $337.38 Refer 1 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -400 Repairs & Maintenance SVC- GLEN ELYN LIFT GENERATOR & $964.55 INSTALL NEW CIRCUIT BREAKER @ ARBOR PT LS Invoice 27568 4/16/2014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $964.55 Refer 3 BAER, MARCIA _ Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT -1665 $168.44 CANARY LANE- M. BAER Invoice 05132014 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 4115/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $168.44 Refer 2 BENIEK PROPERTY SVCS INC._ Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #1 CBD APRIL 2014 PLOWING $680.00 Invoice 142742 4/18/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #2 TRUE VALUE - RAMP - SIDEWALKS $792.00 APRIL 2014 PLOWING& SHOVELING Invoice 142742 4/18/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #3 COMMERCE BLVD APRIL 2014 $1,755.00 PLOWING Invoice 142742 4118/2014 Transaction Date 2/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,227.00 ..... ,...... ........., Refer 75 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 222-42260 -210 Operating Supplies COFFEE & CREAMER- FIRE DEPT. $59.00 Invoice 1166475 4/16/2014 -860- r CITY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments 05/08/14 1:37 PM Page 2 Current Period: May 2014 Transaction Date 518/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $59.00 Refer 4 BUSINESS FORMS AND ACCOUNT Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -203 Printed Forms LASER AP CHECKS -5,000 Invoice 048628 4/2812014 PO 23936 BATTERY BOLT Transaction Date 515/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 -��� Refer _ 49 CARQUESTAUTO PARTS (FIRE)�� FUEL PUMP ASSEMBLY #212 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair BOAT 11 #28 AIR FILTER Invoice 6974 - 223873 4/12/2014 FUEL FILTER'06 FORD E350 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair LIFT SUPPORT #34 '99 FORD F350 Invoice 6974- 224216 4/1812014 AUTO STOCK PARTS Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies ABSORBENT- MEDIUM 25 LB Invoice 6974- 224490 4/22/2014 AUTO BATTERY'07 DODGE DAKOTA Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer . 48 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (PIVO AUTO BATTERIES TRANS DISCONNECT Cash Payment E602-49450-221 Equipment Parts TRANS DISCONNECT $432.34 Total $432.34 $8.84 $29.62 $43.65 Total $82.11 $22.22 Invoice 6974- 223287 412/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts BATTERY BOLT Invoice 6974 - 223522 41712014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -221 Equipment Parts FUEL PUMP ASSEMBLY #212 Invoice 6974 - 223654 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -221 Equipment Parts FUEL FILTER'06 FORD E350 Invoice 6974 - 223657 41912014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts AUTO STOCK PARTS Invoice 6974 - 224164 411712014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts AUTO BATTERY'07 DODGE DAKOTA Invoice 6974- 224479 412212014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts AUTO BATTERIES TRANS DISCONNECT Invoice 6974 - 224548 4/23/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts EXACT FIT WIPER BLADE- PARKS VAN Invoice 6974- 224905 4/29/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts UNIV LIFT SUPPORT -#407 PELICAN SWEEPER Invoice 6974 - 225011 4/3012014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 5 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05132014 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05132014 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05132014 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05132014 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05132014 4/2312014 $5.91 $281.36 $4.42 $101.08 $112.89 - $56.22 $18.18 $40.54 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $530.38 2649 EMERALD DR. LS E3 GENERATOR $26.12 NATL GAS SVC 3 -20 -14 THRU 4 -21 -14 4791 NORTHERN RD LS Dt GENERATOR $28.05 NATL GAS SVC 3 -20 -14 THRU 4 -21 -14 3303 WATERBURY RD LS GAS SVC 3 -20 -14 $22.25 THRU 4 -21 -14 2990 HIGHLAND BLVD LS B1 GENERATOR $26.03 NATL GAS SVC 3 -20 -14 THRU 4 -21 -14 4948 BARTLETT LS E2 GENERATOR NATL $29.00 GAS SV-861 14 THRU 4 -21 -14 CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND 05/08/14 1:37 PM Page 3 Current Period: May 2014 4a wN"it. *C.'b Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -383 Gas Utilities 4728 CARLOW RD LS GENERATOR NATL $22.25 GAS SVC 3 -20 -14 THRU 4 -21 -14 Invoice 05132014 4/23/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $153.70 Refer 6 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORP_OR Cash Payment E60249450-230 Shop Materials OXYGEN & ACETYLENE CYLINDERS Invoice 00783107 4/14/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER RENTAL Invoice 00019142 4130/2014 Project 14 -3 2/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Refer - 67 CLAREY S SAFETY EQUIPMENT, I 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies AED BATTERY Invoice 155275 4/29/2014 PO 24299 R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 �- Refer -� 54 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. Invoice 05132014 5/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials DURA DRIVE HOTMIX 2.58 TONS Invoice 140430 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 7 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORN _ Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts STIHL EAR MUFF Invoice 93249 4124/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -221 Equipment Parts SAW CHAINS, STIHL BAR Invoice 93131 4/16/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 68 D VINCIS NAVARRE, INCORPORAT _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -431 Meeting Expense FIRE COMMISSION LUNCH 5 -7 -14 Invoice 416003 5/7/2014 Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 74 DOCK MASTERS OF LAKE MTKA I _ Cash Payment E 281- 45210 -440 Other Contractual Servic 10 DOCK SECTIONS & PLATES -1 EKLO DOCK FOR LOST LAKE $125.74 $17.16 $142.90 $259.00 Total $259.00 $140.48 Total $140.48 $11.95 $78.62 Total $90.57 $46.73 Total $46.73 F $400.00 Invoice 202517 4/16/2014 Transaction Date 5/8/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 9 EDINA REALTY TITLE Cash Payment R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT- 1665 CANARY LANE- EDINA REALTY Invoice 05132014 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 516/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 55 ELECTRIC PUMP Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair / Maint Supply FLYGT PARTS- REPAIR FLUSH VALVE KIT, HEX NUT LOCK, GASKET Invoice 0052546 412312014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -220 Repair / Maint Supply PUMP LABOR- IMPELLER ADJUSTMENT OFFSET Invoice 0052547 4123/2014 Transaction Date 517/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 56 ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENTAN ,�.�..�.-862- Total $400.00 $182.32 $182.32 $732.20 $0.00 $732.20 CITY OF MOUND 05/081141:37 PM _ Page 4 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 ,ait„ic Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs REPAIR STREET SWEEPER - LABOR & $7,990.15 PARTS Invoice 11043 4/2112014 Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,990.15 Refer 8 EXECUTIVE TITLE WAYZATA _ Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT -4626 $232.79 BEDFORD RD T. PAKONEN Invoice 05132014 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $232.79 Refer 72 FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC HENNEPIN _ Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -434 Conference & Training BLUE CARD TRAINING- $425 1FIREMAN G. $2,550.00 PEDERSON, B BERENT, B. GOTTSCHALK, J. HARRISON, J. MAAS, J. RICE Invoice 14 -008 4/17/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -434 Conference & Training BLUE CARD TRAINING- INKIND SERVICES - $2,125.00 Invoice 14 -008A 4/17/2014 Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $425.00 69 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES 1 _Refer Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -219 Safety supplies 6" CUSTOM LEATHER "FIREFIGHTER" $126.53 FRONT #38 Invoice 8311 4/24/2014 Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total � � . m...... . " . $126.53 70 FIRE SAFETY EDUCATION _Refer Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -217 Fire Prevention Supplies CHILDREN'S FIRE HATS, TATOOS, LOLIPOPS $1,137.30 Invoice 46796 4/2212014 PO 24297 Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,137.30 Refer 71 FIRE SAFETY USA INCORPORATE _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies 2 MUSTANG ICE COMMANDER SUITS $1,565.00 Invoice 68633 4/17/2014 PO 24289 Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,565.00 ..�,.�10 FIRSTLAB Refer Cash Payment E 10143100 -305 Medical Services DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREENS $40.00 Invoice 00768488 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 10145200 -305 Medical Services DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREENS $35.00 Invoice 00768488 4121/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -305 Medical Services DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREENS $40.00 Invoice 00768488 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -305 Medical Services DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREENS $40.00 Invoice 00768488 4/21/2014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $155.00 Refer 32 FIVE TECHNOLOGY _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41920 -440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY SVC & NETWORK MTCE- MAY $1,800.00 2014 Invoice 129033 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 4/112014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,800.00 Refer 11 FLATAND VERTICAL TILE STONE _ -863- OT4° OF [,SOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 05/08/14 1:37 PM Page 5 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic CLEAN STRIP & SEAL FLOORS FIRE $739.50 DISPATCH, UPSTAIRS, HALL, RESTROOMS Invoice 05132014 4/22/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -440 Other Contractual Servic CLEAN STRIP & SEAL CITY HALL FLOORS $380.50 HALLS, RESTROOMS Invoice 05132014 4/2212014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Refer 33 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA _ Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 05132014 4130/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 57 FULLERTON BUILDING CENTER _ Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 2185050 4/18/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 2185273 4/28/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 2185274 4/28/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 2185271 4/28/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 2185269 4/28/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 2185272 4/28/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 2185270 4/28/2014 Transaction Date 517/2014 Refer 12 G & K SERVICES Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,120.00 PHONE SVC 4/30/14 TO 5/29/14 $118.48 PHONE SVC 4/30/14 TO 5/29/14 $67.45 PHONE SVC 4/30/14 TO 5/29114 $573.62 PHONE SVC 4/30114 TO 5/29/14 $418.60 PHONE SVC 4130/14 TO 5/29114 $406.29 PHONE SVC 4/30/14 TO 5/29/14 $406.29 PHONE SVC 4/30/14 TO 5/29/14 $853.58 PHONE SVC 4130/14 TO 5/29/14 $284.53 PHONE SVC 4130/14 TO 5129/14 $142.26 PHONE SVC 4130114 TO 5/29114 $142.26 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,413.36 RED CEDAR LUMBER - SCREWS- PARKS $36.55 RETURN -RED CEDAR LUMBER - SCREWS- - $36.55 PARKS RED CEDAR LUMBER- SCREWS -PARKS $36.55 RED CEDAR LUMBER -- PARKS $226.30 RETURN RED CEDAR LUMBER -- PARKS - $226.30 RED CEDAR LUMBER-- PARKS $58.20 RETURN RED CEDAR LUMBER -- PARKS - $58.20 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $36.55 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 4 -14 -14 Invoice 1006255834 4/14/2014 -864- $25.21 G €TY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments 05/08/14 1:37 PM Page 6 Current Period: May 2014 ,..eh }w"w" a4va..,i,StislTUx Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006255834 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006255834 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006255834 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006267257 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006267257 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006267257 4/2112014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006267257 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006278647 4/28/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006278647 4/28/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006278647 4/28/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006278647 4/28/2014 Transaction Date 4/3/2013 Refer 13 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006278648 4/28/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006255837 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006255837 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006278642 4/2812014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006267250 4/2112014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006267258 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006267258 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006289995 5/5/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006289995 5/5/201.4 Cash Payment E 609 49750 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006289987 5/512014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006278649 4/28/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006278649 4128/2014 UNIFORM SVC 4 -14 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 4 -14 -14 $36.84 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -14 -14 $182.94 Project 14 -3 UNIFORM SVC 4 -21 -14 $25.21 UNIFORM SVC 4 -22 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 4 -21 -14 $36.84 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -21 -14 $408.58 Project 14 -3 UNIFORM SVC 4 -28 -14 $25.21 UNIFORM SVC 4 -28 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 4 -28 -14 $36.84 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -28 -14 $178.38 Project 14 -3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,033.00 MAT SVC 4 -28 -14 CENT BLDG $55.74 UNIFORM SVC 4 -14 -14 PARKS $47.67 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -14 -14 PARKS $75.02 MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 4 -28 -14 LIQUOR $101.54 STORE MAT SVC 4 -21 -14 LIQUOR STORE $69.98 UNIFORM SVC 4 -21 -14 PARKS $46.88 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -21 -14 PARKS $65.27 SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -05 -14 PARKS $65.27 UNIFORM SVC 5 -05 -14 PARKS $46.88 MAT SVC 5 -05 -14 LIQUOR STORE $69.98 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -28 -14 PARKS $75.10 UNIFORM SVC 4 -28 -14 PARKS $52.11 i. CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND 05/08/14 1:37 PM Page 7 Current Period: May 2014 ,. a)ei"atw`4sa ✓a w s;,.�TJ', .. "'43"uwW"11u uvuwau.;.4euuxl*F f ,,,,i., „.. 3i 1,44. ` i :" ?.vuw�k. wx2"'SY: Transaction Date 5/5/2014 _Refer 14 GAMETIME Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 0831120 4/1512014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Refer 34 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -395 Gopher One -Call Invoice 104067 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -395 Gopher One -Call Invoice 104067 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 50 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -227 Chemicals Invoice 3584992 4/17/2014 Transaction Date 4/3/2014 Refer - 15- HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice C282618 4/17/2014 Transaction Date 51512014 Refer 35 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 97317 4/11/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 16 HOME DEPOT /GECF (PA49 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $771.44 PLAYGROUND EQUIP ACCESSORIES, SEAT, $1,014.40 SPRING, MIRROR, CLEVIS Project 14 -3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,014.40 APRIL 2014 LOCATES Invoice 2971676 $60.90 APRIL 2014 LOCATES $60.90 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $121.80 45 LB AQUAMATE GRANULAR 5/6/2014 $186.68 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $186.68 6" SOLID TUBING DRAINTILE $310.20 $129.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $129.00 WELD 4" NIPPLE ON PLATE W /HOLES $105.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $105.00 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies SHOP SOFFIT REBUILD MATERIALS $1,291.05 Invoice 8262806 4/112014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies RETURN SHOP SOFFIT MATERIALS - $40.48 Invoice 2971676 4/7/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply RATCHET, NAILS, LUMBER, STUDS $162.06 Invoice 7013445 5/6/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply LADDER & HDWE- PARKS $310.20 Invoice 7594732 5/212014 Transaction Date 515/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total -- — - - -,, " ,b, _ $1,722.83 .,�.,.,_ Refer 111- -, o ,.36 ISS FACILITY SERVICES MINNEAP _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic EVERGLAZE FLOORS- HWS $384.75 Invoice 732321 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic EVERGLAZE TILE FLOORS- CENTENNIAL $930.00 BLDG Invoice 732324 4/23/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 37 JAN[ -KING OF MINNESOTA, INCOR Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice MING5140494 5/1/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice MIN05140494 5/1/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total MONTHLY CLEANING CITY HALL MAY 2014 MONTHLY CLEANING FIRE DEPT MAY 2014 S.. $1,314.75 $700.00 $700.00 i lTY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 05/08/14 1:37 PM Page 8 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -460 Janitorial Services MONTHLY CLEANING CENT BLDG MAY 2014 $476.00 Invoice MIN05140494 5/1/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -460 Janitorial Services MONTHLY CLEANING PUB WRKS BLDG MAY $258.83 2014 Invoice MIN05140494 511/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 38 JUBILEE FOODS a, Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 05012014 412/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -431 Meeting Expense Invoice 05012014 41312014 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -431 Meeting Expense Invoice 05012014 414/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 05012014 4/1612014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -431 Meeting Expense Invoice 05012014 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -431 Meeting Expense Invoice 05012014 5/7/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 _Refer - -- - .m, 18 LAKE MINNETONKA COMM. COMMm Cash Payment E 101 -49840 -300 Professional Srvs Project 14 -3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,134.83 DISH SOAP -CITY HALL $7.98 POP & WATER CITY MGRS' LUNCH MTG $19.22 BLUE CARD TRAINING BEVERAGES- 4/5 & $70.08 4/6/14 MORTON ICE MELT- HWS $11.51 BEVERAGES, PLATES & NAPKINS- FIRE $15.16 COMMISSION MTG 5 -7 -14 COOKIES, WATER- FIRE COMMISSION MTG $6.49 5 -7 -14 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $130.44 1 ST QTR 2014 PEG ACCESS FEE PER SUBSCRIBER Invoice 05012014 411512014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer -� 59 LAKE RESTORATION, INC.��- ������ Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -440 Other Contractual Servic BEACHWOOD POND TREATMENT DUCKWEED, SUBMERGED WEEDS &ALGAE Invoice 112054 4/29/2014 Transaction Date 5/712014 -1 Refer —��- 19 LAWSONPRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 101-45200 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 9302390394 4/17/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 9302394937 4/2112014 Transaction Date 4/3/2014 Refer 60 LEAGUE OF- MINNESOTA CITIES Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -434 Conference & Training Wells Fargo 10100 Total MISC PARTS- NUTS, DISPOSABLE GLOVES, HEAT SEAL RINGS, LOCK, CONNECTORS, EAR PLUGS MISC PARTS- NUTS, DRILL BITS, SAFETY GLASSES, GRAY MTCE PAINT, RUST CONVERTER, FLAP DISC, BLUE STRIPE PAINT, LUBE Wells Fargo 10100 Total 2014 CLERKS ORIENTATION CONFERENCE - A. STARK JUNE 18 -20 Invoice 199568 5/5/2014 PO 23938 Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 17 LKQ SMART PARTS INC _ -867- Total $11,846.24 $11,846.24 $574.00 $574.00 $483.63 $507.35 $990.98 $250.00 $250.00 CITY OF MOUND 05/08/14 1:37 PM Page 9 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 w. rb..` uU�M. ta, W,. lii,.ahi.`.t's'fif�vfi£.�In11+� �v�+- Se.'aY wx.L�Yk,u"Wi1lC Xm.Y dvy.uAx KONICA MINOLTA HP3035 FINANCE /P &1 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs TRANSMISSION ASSEMBLY $1,235.00 Invoice 55565599 4/7/2014 PO 24349 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts F150 TRUCK RIM- PARKS $80.00 Invoice 55652577 4/9/2014 Invoice 1737865 4/17/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs TRANSMISSION CORE RETURN - $429.10 Invoice 55703029 4/10/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $885.90 Refer_ 20 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR� Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA HP3035 FINANCE /P &1 $70.92 COPIER B & WHT COPIES 1 -20 -14 THRU 4- 3 BIKE RACKS 19-14 Invoice 2014055 Invoice 1737865 4/17/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA HP3035 FINANCE /P &1 $70.92 $25.00 COPIER B & WHT COPIES 1 -20 -14 THRU 4- TEST 4 -28 -14 19-14 Invoice 700445 Invoice 1737865 4/17/2014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $141.84 Refer 39 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR��� Refer 61 MNI WI PLAYGROUND _ Cash Payment E602-49450-202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 PW COPIER $6.26 3 BIKE RACKS OVERAGE CHG 4 -10 -14 TO 5 -9 -14 Invoice 2014055 Invoice 1745221 5/1/2014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 2/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6.26 Refer 40 MCFOA _ Refer 53 MNSPECT _ Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -433 Dues and Subscriptions MUNICIPAL CLERKS & FINANCE OFFICERS $35.00 APRIL 2014 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES MEMBERSHIP DUES- C. PAUSCHE Invoice 6297 Invoice 05132014 5/6/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35.00 Refer 52 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE _ Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS WASTEWATER SERVICES JUNE 2014 $51,406.04 Invoice 0001033454 516/2014 -868 Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $51,406.04 Refer 21 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -470 Water Samples MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM $77.50 WATER TESTS -10 Invoice 698131 4/16/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -470 Water Samples WELL #3 COLI FORM BACTERIA WATER $25.00 TEST 4 -28 -14 Invoice 700445 5/2/2014 Transaction Date 2/4/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $102.50 Refer 61 MNI WI PLAYGROUND _ Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -500 Capital Outlay FA 3 BIKE RACKS $1,252.00 Invoice 2014055 5/1/2014 PO 24352 Transaction Date 5/712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,252.00 Refer 53 MNSPECT _ Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees APRIL 2014 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES $2,730.98 Invoice 6297 5/6/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -20800 Due to Other Governments APRIL 2014 - ELECTRICAL STATE - $80.00 SURCHFO°° °SE CREDIT -868 Invoice 6297 5/6/2014 CITY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments 05/08/14 1:37 PM Page 10 Current Period: May 2014 hli"ti °� 1Gd?S'uH''r'L`v11i.s. 4, $atA3r:�+Rua�;ANk, 3$ <.." sY.:1 . . - Cash Payment R 101 - 42000 -32220 Electrical Permit Fee APRIL 2014 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION - $253.00 PERMIT FEE CREDITS Invoice 6297 5/6/2014 Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Refer 41 NORLINGS LAKE MINNETONKA LA Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 29172 4/21/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total REMOVE WINTER COVERS ON ARBORVITAE- 3 PTS BLVD LIFT STATION Project PW 1303 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,397.98 $55.00 $55.00 Refer 42 NS /I MECHANICAL CONTRACTING, _ Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -401 Building Repairs PREVENTIVE MTCE AGREEMENT JAN THRU $336.87 APRIL 2014 CENT BLDG Invoice W31375 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $336.87 Refer 43 PLUNKETT S, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -440 Other Contractual Servic PEST CONTROL SVC- CENT BLDG 4 -2 -14 $108.16 Invoice 4159780 511/2014 Transaction Date 2/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $108.16 Refer 28 QUAM, JOHN _ Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -37144 Sales of Meters & Rea DEDUCT METER REFUND 5021 CRESTVIEW $125.00 BLVD -J. QUAM Invoice 05132014 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $125.00 Refer 44 REPUBLIC SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -384 Refuse /Garbage Dispose MAY 2014 GARBAGE SVC $143.65 Invoice 0894- 003478590 4/25/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa MAY 2014 GARBAGE SVC $143.64 Invoice 0894 - 003478590 4/2512014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -384 Refuse /Garbage Dispose MAY 2014 GARBAGE SVC $143.69 Invoice 0894- 003478592 4/25/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -384 Refuse /Garbage Dispose MAY 2014 GARBAGE SVC $149.00 Invoice 0894 - 003474924 4/25/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa MAY 2014 GARBAGE SVC $219.47 Invoice 0894 - 003475477 4/25/2014 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -440 Other Contractual Servic APRIL 2014 CITY -WIDE RECYCLING SVC $12,991.77 Invoice 0894- 003474617 4/25/2014 Transaction Date 516/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,791.22 Refer 23 SCHARBER AND SONS OF LONG L�� Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -232 Landscape Material SUMMER SOIL, ULTRA MIX SOIL $86.47 Invoice P16718 4/18/2014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $86.47 Refer 22 SIMPLEXGR/NNELL Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic TAX DUE 2014 BURGLARY- INTRUSION $24.47 ALARM MONITORING HWS Invoice 76744644 1/23/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic TAX DUE 2014 FIRE ALARM & DETECTION $30,60 MONITORING HWS Invoice 76744603 1/23/2014 -869- CITY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 05/08/14 1:37 PM Page 11 ;?htiut.axa,..;d +wx wd55, tititulP .ti)aS.v5:S5i'kt.,�11;ptiv''wt ..«.w ,..�^M1Zwua,. .. ... '1^:�i Transaction Date 10/1/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $55.07 Refer _ 24 STA -SAFE LOCKSMITHS_COMPAN Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance TAILPIECE ASSEMBLY -FIRE DOOR BOTTOM $103.80 OF SOUTH STAIRS Invoice 00019841 4/22/2014 E 101- 45200 -351 Legal Notices Publishing PARKS COMMISSION OPENINGS AD 4 -19 -14 Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -210 Operating Supplies EXTRA KEYS- CITY HALL $14.25 Invoice 00019849 4/29/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -351 Legal Notices Publishing Transaction Date 5/512014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $118.05 Refer 25 SUN NEWSPAPERS -HWS ACCT _ Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -430 Miscellaneous READERS' CHOICE AD- HWS 4 -5 -14 $261.00 Invoice 193769 415/2014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $261.00 Refer 26 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE -2013 ANNUAL DRINKING $404.78 WATER REPORT 4 -19 -14 Invoice 93440 4/19/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -328 Employment Advertising PUBLIC WORKS SEASONAL WORKER $74.00 EMPLOYMENT ADS 4 -5 -14 Invoice 199739 4/5/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -328 Employment Advertising PUBLIC WORKS SEASONAL WORKER $74.00 EMPLOYMENT ADS 4 -12 Invoice 199739 4/12/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -328 Employment Advertising PARKS SEASONAL WORKER EMPLOYMENT $74.00 ADS 4 -19 -14 Invoice 199739 4/19/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -328 Employment Advertising PARKS SEASONAL WORKER EMPLOYMENT $74.00 ADS 4 -26 -14 Invoice 199739 4/26/2014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $700.78 Refer 27 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY _ Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE -AMEND PUBLIC LANDS $19.28 PERMITS APPROVAL PROCESS 4 -19 -14 Invoice 93439 4/19/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -351 Legal Notices Publishing PARKS COMMISSION OPENINGS AD 4 -19 -14 $91.20 Invoice 94472 4/19/2014 Invoice 113714 4110/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -351 Legal Notices Publishing PARKS COMMISSION OPENINGS AD 4 -26 -14 $91.20 Invoice 96911 4/2612014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing HYDRANT FLUSHING NOTICE- 4 -26 -14 $114.00 Invoice 96912 4/26/2014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $315.68 Refer 46 TRUE VALUE HWS Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 113860 4/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 113714 4110/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 45 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 114211 4/28/2014 TILE ADHESIVE, NOTCH SPREADER NATURALCLEANER Wells Fargo 10100 RECEPTAN F COVER -870- $9.38 $13.88 Total $23.26 $4.29 CITY OF MOUND 05/08/14 1:37 PM ,,-- —'—� Page 12 Payments &ITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4.29 Refer -��47 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PWPKS)_� Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies SANDPAPER- PICNIC TABLES $5.98 Invoice 113462 4/112014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS SIGN SHOP $43.96 Invoice 113468 4/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS SIGN SHOP, $15.48 FLANGE Invoice 113487 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials SOCKET SET, SOCKADAPTER, $40.97 THREADLOCKER - #109 Invoice 113489 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials RETURN SOCKET SET - $23.99 Invoice 113492 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials HEX BUSHING, CONNECTOR $8.98 Invoice 113493 4/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies AEREATOR- TRAIL BATHROOMS $11.98 Invoice 113520 4/3/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts RND STL ROD $14.99 Invoice 113606 4/7/2014 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -210 Operating Supplies FLIP UP TOOL HOLDERS $19.98 Invoice 113623 4/7/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts BALL VALVES, ADAPTERS, PVC PIPE $26.36 Invoice 113668 419/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies SHOP CLEANERS, WIPES, ADJ SPRAYER $33.74 Invoice 113680 4/912014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply TENNIS NETS- PARKS CABLES, HDWE $15.02 Invoice 113801 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials MURIATIC ACID $8.49 Invoice 113833 4/15/2014 Cash Payment E 285 -46388 -210 Operating Supplies TRASH CAN LINER- PARKING DECK $11.99 Invoice 113867 4/16/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS, FUEL SHUT OFF $26.06 VALVE, MOWER FUEL LINE FILTER Invoice 113906 4/1812014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS, ELBOW $4.14 Invoice 113910 4/18/2014 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply GALV CAPS- WELL #3 $8.58 Invoice 113929 4/18/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS- IP HALL REPAIR $6.38 Invoice 113980 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -430 Miscellaneous FLOWERS FOR CENTENNIAL BLDG $42.98 PLANTERS Invoice 114197 4/27/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 - "-- ---- ...,11 Wells Fargo 10100 Total �.. .................... $322.07 _. -...nP 1- -'..,__„r.,rona Refer 29 UHL COMPANY Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance SVC CALL HEATING SYSTEM- CITY HALL 4- $721.00 18 -14 Invoice 26616 4/18/2014 _ Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Farr. 871- 10100 Total $721.00 CITY OF MOUND 05/08/14 1:37 PM -- - ---�, Page 13 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 ..,,. ri sib,`„ag1ntVa.'Sxv�tF,i«+ti4'RY u"Sai": t'Sdul�,Rr"kivU'3'X.,.Pan.�. Refer 51 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE_ Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance LEAK LOCATE @ 5928 HILLCREST RD 3 -24- $266.80 14 Invoice 4977 4/22/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance LEAK LOCATE @ 2443 COMMERCE BLVD 3- $292.00 26 -14 Invoice 4977 4/2212014 Transaction Date 516/2014 Refer 30 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 0518661770 4/25/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 0518919079 4/28/2014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Refer 31 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE -�� Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 54089299 4/21/2014 Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 285 MOUND HRA 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND Wells Fargo 10100 Total $558.80 SHORELINE /COMMERCE STREET LIGHTS 3- $56.63 26 THRU 4 -24 -14 CARLOW RD LIFT STATION ELECTRIC SVC $93.47 3 -29 THRU 4 -26 -14 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.10 FINGERTIP BANDAGES, ANTIBIOTIC $24.30 OINTMENT STERILE TWEEZERS Wells Fargo 10100 Total $24.30 10100 Wells Fargo $40,324.62 $8,698.95 $400.00 $11.99 $2,922.01 $57,817.83 $1,550.71 $13,565.77 $125,291.88 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $425,291.88 Total $125,291.88 -872- CITY OF MOUND 05/08/1411:40 AM Page 1 Payments CITY OF N40UND Current Period: May 2014 z. ... t ;K �? k rc C ", Batch Name 051314HWS User Dollar Amt $116,049.49 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $116,049.49 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 463411804 4128/2014 Refer BELLBOY CORPORATION__ _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R FREIGHT Invoice 463411804 4/28/2014 Transaction Date 5/612014 Wells Fargc Refer 2 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 49199 4/2312014 Invoice 90140800 517/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargc Refer 36 ASPEN EMBROIDERYAND DESIG 10100 Total 10100 Total Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -218 Clothing and Uniforms SWEATSHIRTS & FLEECE CREWS W /HWS LOGO EMBROIDERED- 54 ITEMS Invoice 05132014 5/512014 Transaction Date 5/8/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer BELLBOY CORPORATION__ _ _3 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS, SUPPLIES Invoice 90054200 4/18/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 90059000 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX Invoice 90086400 4/25/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS, SUPPLIES, C -FOLD TOWELS Invoice 90140600 5/712014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX Invoice 90140800 517/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCH, CUBS & TWINS CUPS, Invoice 90140800 5/7/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 42673900 4118/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 42673900 4/1812014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 42689900 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 42770000 4/25/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 42770000 4/25/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 42825200 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 42825200 4/3012014 -873- Total Total $120.28 $1.00 $121.28 $237.45 $237.45 $1,882.50 $1,882.50 $50.60 $51.00 $60.95 $70.70 $258.58 $49.46 $541.29 $453.05 $10.20 $3,496.45 $291.00 $5.10 $1,852.75 $18.60 CITY OF MOUND 05/08/1411:40 AM Page 2 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 14061 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,874.30 Invoice 42845000 5/212014 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 19495 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $49.60 Invoice 42845000 512/2014 5/6/2014 Refer, Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6,053.66 Invoice 42930400 5/7/2014 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 749638 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $76,34 Invoice 42930400 5/7/2014 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 750479 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $112.00 Invoice 42934200 5/7/2014 5/6/2014 Refer Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $1.55 Invoice 42934200 5/7/2014 5/6/2014 Refer 10 Transaction Date 5/612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $16,294.60 Refer 5 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN 'Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $207.55 Invoice 128979 4/2312014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $858.43 Invoice 128980 4/23/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,065.98 Refer 6 CROWRIVER WINERY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 14061 4/17/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 7 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 19495 4/2112014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 1077518 5/5/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer, 8 DAYDISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 749637 4/29/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 749638 4/29/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 748805 4/22/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 750479 5/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 750713 5/6/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 9 EXCELSIOR BREWING COMPAA Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 3588 4/22/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 10 EXTREME BEVERAGE MaR4 $402.92 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $402.92 BEER $522.00 BEER $676,60 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,198.60 BEER $3,107.70 BEER $36.80 BEER $3,396.95 BEER $300.00 BEER $3,660.90 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,502.35 BEER $110.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $110.00 ME CITY OF MOUND E609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale 05/08/1411:40 AM ---�„ Invoice 2199963 Page 3 !l Payments Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $77.60 r 4/22/2014 -F OF MOUND Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale Current Period: May 2014 $444.35 Invoice 2213409 4/29/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $97.00 Invoice W944216 4/16/2014 MIX $77.60 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX 5/6/2014 $145.50 Invoice W952079 4130/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $3,464.45 $130,50 Invoice W936471 4/2/2014 Cash Payment Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $373.00 Refer 11 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED Invoice 2194499 4122/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment $386.00 Invoice 698712 4/23/2014 Total $7,298,95 5/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $567.25 Invoice 701034 517/2014 WINE $2,959.25 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $973.25 Refer 37 INDIAN ISLAND WINERY Invoice 1845017 5/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $275.52 Invoice 1982 5/5/2014 ._ Transaction Date 5/812014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $275.52 Refer 12 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,185.75 Invoice 2199963 4122/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $77.60 Invoice 2199964 4/22/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $444.35 Invoice 2213409 4/29/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $77.60 Invoice 2213448 5/6/2014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,464.45 Invoice 2213447 5/612014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $49.20 Invoice 2194499 4122/2014 Cash Payment Transaction Date 516/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,298,95 Refer 14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,106.21 Invoice 1839487 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,377.85 Invoice 1839488 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 516/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,484.06 Refer 13 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR������ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $36.00 Invoice 1833997 4123/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,183.06 Invoice 1833995 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,776.35 Invoice 1833996 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $24,00 Invoice 1845018 5/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,959.25 -875 Invoice 1845017 5/7/2014 —w CITY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 05/08/14 11:40 AM Page 4 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,926.91 Invoice 1845016 5/712014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,905.57 Refer 38 LAKE MONSTER BREWING _ _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $130.00 Invoice 1331 5/6/2014 4/21/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $130.00 Refer 15 MARLIN S TRUCKING Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 29245 413/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 29265 4/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 29274 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 29290 4/1712014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 29298 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 29314 4/24/2014 Transaction Date 51612014 DELIVERY SVC 4 -03 -14 DELIVERY SVC 4 -10 -14 DELIVERY SVC 4 -14 -14 DELIVERY SVC 4 -17 -14 DELIVERY SVC 4 -21 -14 DELIVERY SVC 4 -24 -14 Wells Fargo 10100 $222.35 $170.45 $105.85 $347.95 $47.85 $183.30 Total $1,077.75 Refer 39 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 4 -7 -14 Invoice 928023614 4/2712014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 16 MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSN Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -412 Building Rentals Invoice 05132014 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 17 MOUND, CITY OF Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -382 Water Utilities Invoice 05132014 4/20/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 18 MUZAK- MINNEAPOLIS MAY 2014 COMMON AREA MTCE & INSURANCE HWS Wells Fargo 10100 Total WATER SERVICE 3-4 -14 THRU 4 -1 -14 HWS Wells Fargo 10100 Total $61.00 $61.00 $1,045.50 $1,045.50 $48.10 $48.10 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic MAY 2014 MUSIC SERVICE $115.95 Invoice A093115 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $115.95 Refer PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ _19 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $798.69 Invoice 8445437 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $11.25 Invoice 8445437 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $57.00 Invoice 8445436 4121/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.25 Invoice 8445436 4/21/2014 -876- CITY OF MOUND 05/08/1411:40 AM Page 5 Payments CITV - OF Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.25 Invoice 8445444 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rase MIX $47.00 Invoice 8445444 4/2112014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ... ........ ........ . . ------ $918.44 20 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA - -Refer Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $990.16 Invoice 8446284 4128/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $13.75 Invoice 8446284 4/28/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $153,94 Invoice 8446578 4/29/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.25 Invoice 8446578 4/29/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $254.00 Invoice 8447206 5/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.25 Invoice 8447206 5/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,305.04 Invoice 8446054 4/2412014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $18.75 Invoice 8446054 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $57.00 Invoice 8447204 515/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.25 Invoice 8447204 515/2014 Transaction Date 5/612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,802.39 Refer 21 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $618.25 Invoice 2593491 412312014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $647.60 Invoice 2593490 4/23/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 ------ ­1 — ------------ Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,265.85 ___1__11_____"_____'_ Refer 22 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $179,60 Invoice 2597080 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $859.10 Invoice 2597081 4/3012014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,211.60 Invoice 2600847 5/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,408.45 Invoice 2600848 5/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $56.00 Invoice 2600849 5/712014 Transaction Date 516/2014 _, _" - —1-1-11-1111-1,11 1 Wells Fargo 11­­­1__,___"'', 10100 Total " I'll ­111 11 1 ''I'll, I., I I'll .1 111, 11,11- I'll $3,714.75 - 1 1-11 - - ­­­ 111"_ .... ...... Refer 23 1 11 11-1— 1-1. QUILL.COM Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies COPY PAPER $64.10 Invoice 2088949 4/10/2014 -877- i ILI 61TY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments 05/08/14 11:40 AM Page 6 Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -200 Office Supplies REGISTER ROLLS, LASERJET TONER, TAPE $475.96 & DISPENSER Invoice 2088319 4/10/2014 Transaction Date 5/612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $540.06 Refer _ 24 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC_ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 4 -30 -14 $15.00 EDITION Invoice 293740 4/21/2014 $333.90 Transaction Date 516/2014 Wells Fargo -���- Refer 25 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1156675 4/30/2014 E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1156673 4/30/2014 E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Invoice 9032724 4/16/2014 E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1154276 4/24/2014 51612014 Wells Farr^ 10100 . ............aN... M.. 11 111-1, 1111 ,,: Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1154275 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1154274 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1159127 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale WINE Invoice 1159126 518/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Invoice 0009108 4/2412014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Invoice 0008339 3/13/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo Refer 26 ST. CLOUD REFRIGERATION, INC 10100 10100 Total $15.00 $1,534.00 $1,156.33 - $57.00 $36.14 $941.00 $561.10 $1,292.40 $1,410.00 - $180.00 - $226.97 Total $6,467.00 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs REFRIGERATION & HEATING MTCE - $315.00 REPLACE AIR FILTERS & BELTS 4 -25 -14 Invoice 281256 4130/2014 _ Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $315.00 Refer 28 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $333.90 Invoice 817997 412212014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $189.25 Invoice 817998 4/22/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $51.50 Invoice 817998 4/22/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $6,134.48 Invoice 818000 4/22/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT - $90.00 Invoice 817999 4/22/2014 Transaction Date ..1.111..,,,, -.. -1111 51612014 Wells Farr^ 10100 . ............aN... M.. 11 111-1, 1111 ,,: Total $6,619A3 CITY OF MOUND 05/08/1411:40 AM Page 7 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 4." 1w04`4%2,0,Q ,u, ""'ZV, 02, "'OR, Refer 27 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $161.25 Invoice 819525 412912014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,330.00 Invoice 819526 4/29/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT ADJ INVOICE -$20.00 Invoice 816641CR 4/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT ADJ INVOICE -$29.90 Invoice 771789CR4/7i2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,637.20 Invoice 820860 516/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $125.40 Invoice 820861 5/6/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,203.95 -- —..r Refer 29 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $152.25 Invoice 0097272 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.00 Invoice 0097272 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $96,00 Invoice 0097270 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.00 Invoice 0097270 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa SODA $109.75 Invoice 0097271 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $12.00 Invoice 0097271 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa SODA $36.75 Invoice 0097707 511/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2,50 Invoice 0097707 5/1/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $276,00 Invoice 0097706 5/112014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $7,50 Invoice 0097706 5/1/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $98.00 Invoice 0093942 4/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 0093942 4/1612014 Transaction Date 516/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $799.75 Refer 30 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $636.00 Invoice 358705 4/17/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $13.20 Invoice 358705 4/17/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $268.00 Invoice 359475 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $4.20 Invoice 359475 4/24/2014 -879- CITY OF MOUND 05/08/1411:40 AM Page 8 Payments i CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Invoice 292952 4/18/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 33 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 1090213740 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 1090213761 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 1090216793 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 1090221047 5/7/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 34 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRI _ Wells Fargo 10100 BEER BEER BEER BEER Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1080170875 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $168.00 Invoice 360108 5/1/201.4 LIQUOR Invoice 1080170863 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $6.30 Invoice 360108 5/1/2014 LIQUOR Invoice 1080173041 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 516/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,095.70 .. .v..,..� .. ........ Refer 31 WINE MERCHANTS _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,232.25 Invoice 500356 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $354.75 Invoice 501319 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $67.00 Invoice 500357 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $46.00 Invoice 502297 5/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,880.00 Invoice 502296 517/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 ,. Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,580.00 - ., �.... -.v Refer .... ._..�., .............. 32 WINE NEWS INCORPORATED_ _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE ENTHUSIASTMAY 2014 ISSUES FOR $15.00 SALE Invoice 292952 4/18/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 33 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 1090213740 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 1090213761 4/23/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 1090216793 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 1090221047 5/7/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Refer 34 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRI _ Wells Fargo 10100 BEER BEER BEER BEER Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1080170875 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1080170874 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1080170863 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Invoice 2080035960 4/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1080173041 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1080173366 5/1/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1080176639 5/812014 S:1 Total $15.00 $1,965.00 $348.00 $3,659.30 $2,442.02 Total $6,414.32 $985.64 $23.94 $637.37 - $352.00 $724.97 $587.50 $704.00 CITY OF MOUND 05/08/1411'40 AM Page 9 Payments CITY (3F MOUND Current Period: May 2014 ;aRt. ... . ..... I.... a Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $48.00 Invoice 1080176641 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,734.00 Invoice 1080176640 5/812014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,358.11 Invoice 1080176638 5/8/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,451.53 Refer 35 Z WINES USA LLC _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $670.00 Invoice 12907 4/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $16.00 Invoice 12907 4/24/2014 Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $686.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $116,049.49 $116,049.49 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $116,049.49 Total $116,049.49 I: Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $116,049.49 $116,049.49 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $116,049.49 Total $116,049.49 I: MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 22, 2014 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, April 22, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Kelli Gillispie and Ray Salazar Members absent: None Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Fin Dir /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson, Community Service Officer Mike Wocken, Dan Faulkner, Rita Trapp, Jay Green, Eric Everson, Katie Wojak, Linda Cordie, Robert Brown, Thomas Stokes, Cathy Bailey, Sandy Korlath, Michael Michalk, Brian Simmons, Patricia Ewer, Phil Velsor, Mary Moon, Carolyn Brooks, Karen Buckholtz, Terry Blount, Peter Meyer Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledae of Aileaiance 3. Approve agenda The Mayor noted some page revisions on the agenda that were requested by Staff. Hanson requested the addition of item 4H on the Consent Agenda. MOTION by Salazar, seconded Wegscheid, to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $416,726.22 B. Approve minutes of the: April 8, 2014 regular meeting. April 15, 2014 special meeting workshop C. Approve permits for Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church — The Blast for Saturday, May 17, 2014 with fees paid. 1. Public Dance /Live Music Permit 2. Banner /Sign Permit Mound City Council Minutes —April 22, 2014 D. Approve permits for 2014 Mound Fire Relief Association Annual Fish Fry for June 7, 2014 with fees waived. 1. Banner /Sign Permit 2. Public Dance /Live Music Permit 3. 1 — 4 day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License E. Approve Public Gathering Permit for Minnetonka Classic Bass Club Fishing Contest at Surfside Beach and Park for Saturday, May 31, 2014, with fee and damage deposit paid. F. Parks & Open Space Commission recommendation on new piayscape location. G. Set special meeting workshop for the purpose of receiving a concept plan for an assisted living facility by Trident Development on Tuesday, May 20, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. H. (added) Approve Agreement between the cities of Spring Park and Mound regarding the provision of nuisance enforcement services. 5. Comments and suggestions trom citizens present on any item not on the agenaa. Bob Brown, 5450 Three Points Boulevard and President of Seahorse Condominium Association, presented two bottles of brown water. He summarized a conversation with City Staff on Friday, April 18, 2014. Brown complained about the lack of notification and that residents have incurred damages to clothing and have had to purchase drinking water. The Mayor said this has become a bigger issue and wider spread than what was expected so he will allow the discussion to go over the three (3) minutes. Carlton Moore stated the two water towers on Evergreen and Chateau are being cleaned and that it has to be done either in the spring or fall. Iron and manganese have built up and have to be flushed to clean it out. Flushing a water tower changes the flow and disturbs the water. Moore stated the water is safe. Moore stated the water tower was shut down when the extent of the problem became apparent, but that it may happen again when the Evergreen tower is shut down. The Mayor asked if the minerals settle in the system again or will it flush out. Moore stated it settles and flushes out through the residences. Brown asked why would you do this over Easter weekend and Moore apologized for not considering that fact. Brown asked why the signs were not posted. Brown asked for a reduction in fees. Mayor Hanus said that the majority of residents were inconvenienced and there are not surplus funds so a rebate would just result in higher rates for all. The Mayor requested that Staff provide notification for future maintenance. Eric Evenson, Administrator of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, presented the 2013 Year in Review Report that was included in the information section of the packet. Evenson highlighted partnerships that are in place with universities and local and state agencies to do research and conservation projects. Projects included the stabilization of Big Island shoreline and the restoration of the Minnehaha Creek in parts of St. Louis Park and Hopkins. Evenson also acknowledged the contributions Jay Green has made through his role as the LMCD representative for Mound. Evenson discussed efforts to change the regulations /rules that will impact how cities are able to work with property owners on variances and exceptions. Evenson stated the MCWD is looking at partnerships in order to help communities meet their water resource needs and goals and to Mound City Council Minutes — April 22, 2014 determine how they integrate with economic development and parks and open spaces conservation. Carolyn Brooks, Wheels for Meals/WeCAN fundraising event coordinator, announced the event will take place on Saturday, May 17`h from 10 am to 1 pm. Brooks stated participants will bike to St. Boni and back and that there will be drawings and a raffle. Brooks said the registration fee is $6, which is the price of one meal, and there is information on how to pledge on -line and at the library/schools. 6. Mayor Hanus requesting action on a resolution proclaiming "WeCAB Week in Mound" as May 4 -10. 2014. Hanson acknowledged the members of WeCAB in the audience. Hanson stated WeCAB was formed to fill the transportation gap and has been very successful. Mayor Hanus read the resolution in its entirety. Mike Michalk, Pastor of Mount Olive Lutheran Church and President of WeCAB, spoke to thank the City Council, and particularly Kandis Hanson, for their /her efforts. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -25: RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING WECAB WEEK IN MOUND MAY 4-10,2014 7. Mayor Hanus requesting action on a resolution autnonzmg a TeastDUety siuuy Tor a Lake Minnetonka Scenic By -way concept. Hanson stated this would be one of 23 by -ways in Minnesota and that scenic by -ways promote economic development and tourism. Hanson stated communities are being asked to adopt the resolution in support of the concept. Hanus said the City is approaching this cautiously, and that there appears to be minimal or no cost and that there are no proposals to change the roads. Gesch asked if there is any cost to the City to do this study. Hanson stated there was no request for funding. Gesch asked if this would be operated at the local, state, or federal level. Hanus stated one of the primary concerns was if there would be any requirements to change the road and it appears there is not. Gesch asked if there would be any restrictions on private property owners. Hanus said it is his understanding that the State designates it as by -way and that the cities can choose to sign and /or market it. Gesch asked if research has been done on eminent domain or other impacts on property owners. Hanson stated she expressed those concerns at the meeting and stated that it can't impact the City's broader goals. Hanus said there are many cities that are hesitant but this is just trying to decide if there is enough interest to even study it. Salazar stated he has concerns about traffic and public safety impacts. Hanson stated the City will need to decide on the subject matter that will be emphasized in Mound and she feels the Historical Society will play a role. Gesch asked about the packet materials and Hanson stated that was just an example of a federal level effort. Gillispie questioned the resolution language, specifically the second paragraph where it was not clear what the City's financial obligation would be. Hanus stated he believes the cities will have a lot of discretion as to what extent they want to participate. Gillispie stated she is okay with the concept at this point but does not want to be obligated to spend any money. Mound City Council Minutes —April 22, 2014 Salazar asked if this could go through without our approval and Hanson stated it may be designated but not marked. Hanson stated there are many examples in the state that can be researched to determine the pros and cons. Hanson suggested anyone is free to call the Chamber of Commerce in existing scenic by -way locations in order to hear the pros and cons for themselves. Hanus said it is not saying 'yes' to the concept, just the investigation, and that he had expressed that to Wayzata Mayor Ken Wilcox. Gesch asked if the cities received the same resolution and is concerned about some of the wording. Hanus said that the "Now Therefore..." is the most important part of the resolution and he read the language to confirm it is just approving a study and nothing else. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution. Discussion ensued. Gillispie asked if language should be added to address any cost implications. Salazar asked if traffic impacts would be studied. Hanus said it could be sent back if it was not. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -26: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A LAKE MINNETONKA SCENIC BY -WAY CONCEPT 8. Dan Faulkner Consulting Engineerwnn ttoiton ar menK, requesting giscussromacoon on the following: Faulkner reviewed the report that was included in the packet. Faulkner stated one bid was received and was over 30% of the estimated cost so Staff is recommending denial. Staff brainstormed to determine the reasons for the high bid and low number of responses. Possible reasons include a changing bid climate with the improvement in the economy, the prevailing wage requirements due to MSA funding, the construction and access challenges of Three Points Boulevard, and the required timeframe. Staff is therefore proposing a two year construction timeline dividing the project between the east and west areas of Three Points. Faulkner stated the single entry off of Commerce Boulevard is the challenge. Faulkner recommended bidding the first part in June for construction to begin after July 4 I and to conclude in the fall. Faulkner recommended reducing the area for MSA funding and to bid the utility work separate. Falkner summarized the breakdown of projects and timing presented in the packet. Faulkner stated the Commerce Boulevard force main was removed from the proposal to simplify the package. Hanus asked what the prevailing wage requirement is. Faulkner said it is essentially union wages and smaller contractors don't usually pay those wages. Hanus asked if MSA road standards are meant to handle more traffic or heavier vehicles and Faulkner said both. Faulkner said buses and garbage trucks are the heavier vehicles that use these streets. Hanus asked the impact on MSA funds and whether or not the City would lose funds. Faulkner said there are many items that qualify for state aid and the City would maximize the state aid funding on that portion of the project. The City will pay for the extra depth and width in other areas, but that it will still be built to those standards. Wegscheid asked if Bartlett Boulevard is a MSA street and Faulkner said that it is a County road but that the City owns the utility infrastructure. Gillispie asked why the Commerce Boulevard force main was removed and why was it included in the first place. Faulkner said it was taken out because of the different approach but that it may be added back in depending on the bid results. Wegscheid asked if breaking up the project was designed to attract smaller contractors or more contractors and Faulkner said both. Wegscheid asked what about the Mound City Council Minutes —April 22, 2014 duplication /overlap with separate projects and wouldn't that cut into savings. Faulkner stated the expectation was that the savings would outweigh the duplication /overlap. Hanson said there are other public safety benefits to splitting it up and that the original specifications required the contractor to keep one lane open at all times which drove up costs. Hanus clarified Bartlett Boulevard will be a trenchless repair. Gesch asked about data on water main breaks on Bartlett Boulevard and requested that information on the timing and number of breaks be provided before the bid is brought forward for approval. Wegscheid asked what the costs are to redo the plans and specs and Faulkner said there will be some cost but that the vast majority of information is already there. A. Resolution rejecting the bid for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -27: RESOLUTION REJECTING BID FOR 2014 STREET, UTILITY, AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT —THREE POINTS BOULEVARD B. Resolution ordering preparation of bid documents, and ordering advertisement for bids for the 2104 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — East Three Points Boulevard MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -28: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY, AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJET — EAST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD C. Resolution ordering preparation of bid documents and ordering advertisement for bids for the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvement Project, Lost Lake Bridge to Wilshire Boulevard MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution. Gesch asked if it would be bid differently since it is trenchless and Moore stated it would. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -29: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE BARTLETT BOULEVARD WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — LOST LAKE BRIDGE TO WILSHIRE BOULEVARD D. Resolution ordering preparation of bid documents and ordering advertisement for bids for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — West Three Points Boulevard — Utility Improvements Mound City Council Minutes —April 22, 2014 MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -30: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY, AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — WEST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD — UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS E. Resolution ordering preparation of bid documents and ordering advertisement for bids for the 2104 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — West Three Points Boulevard — Street and Retaining Wall Improvements MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -31: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY, AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — WEST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD — STREET AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS Smith stated at the April 8th Council meeting, Staff was directed to prepare a resolution denying the appeal. Smith stated additional information was received from the applicant for consideration by the Council. Ms. Sisk asked that if the denial is approved, she requested additional time to remove the alpacas. Staff recommends a six month timeframe to avoid having to bring it back to the Council. Smith said that language could be added to the draft resolution to address the timeframe for removal. Hanus noted that on page 824 of the packet, the outcome of the vote was stated backward and the 'three' needs to be 'two' and 'two' needs to be 'three.' Hanus stated he has concerns about the applicant's request being tied to the sale of the home and that it should be based on a reasonable time to find a home for the animals. Discussion ensued about whether the additional language should be included in the draft resolution or a separate resolution. Hanus said he felt it was better supported and enforceable as one resolution. Gillispie asked what if you oppose one motion but support the other. Hanus said that it is part of the role of the Council to have to decide one way or the other even if they don't agree with everything. Smith said she discussed it with the City Attorney who stated that additional language could be added and Smith feels it is in the City's interest to complete this tonight. Hanus polled the Council and the majority of members felt six months was reasonable. Hanus suggested the following additions under the "Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved" section: 5. The applicant must find a new home for the alpacas within six (6) months from the date of the adoption of this resolution. Mound City Council Minutes — April 22, 2014 6. Following the expiration of the six month period, the City retains full ability to enforce the code. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Hanus, to adopt the following resolution as amended. The following voted in favor: Salazar, Hanus, and Gesch. The following voted against: Wegscheid. The following abstained: Gillispie. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -32: RESOLUTION DENYING BOARD OF APPEALS ZONING ADJUSTMENT AND APPEAL REQUEST FROM ALLISON SISK REGARDING THE KEEPING OF ALPACAS AT 6221 WESTEDGE BOULEVARD 10. Sarah Smith Community Development Director, requesting aiscussioniactron on the Urban Agriculture study related to the keeping of chickens. Smith said that at the February 25t Council meeting, the Council directed Staff to prepare language that prohibits bee keeping and to do research to determine what cities allow chickens and to determine if those cities have encountered any issues as a result. Smith summarized the research and said that some cities require a class to educate potential chicken owners. In addition, Staff did analysis using GIS and determined that even if setbacks were applied, some properties in Mound are big enough to accommodate the keeping of chickens. Smith added that hardcover limits could then be an issue. Trapp described the research and said Staff identified a typical lot, average size house, and setbacks that are common in Mound to see if chicken coops can even be accommodated. Trapp summarized a sample of the GIS analysis that was performed. Trapp stated she did feel language could be developed to create enforceable standards and asked if the Council wanted to consider drafting language. Hanus asked if there was anyone in the audience who wanted to speak on the subject. Tom Stokes and his son Harrison, 4744 Hampton Road, said they have had chickens for years but that he does not recommend allowing roosters. He said fresh eggs have more nutritional benefits and he believes 8 -10 square feet per chicken is recommended. His coop has floor space under 50 square feet but it is multi -level and very automated. His son sells the eggs to neighbors and there is plenty of demand. He does not know of any complaints. Hanus asked what happens when they age and don't lay as many eggs. Stokes said they can lay eggs for up to five (5) years. Stokes said there are different breeds of chickens that are better for urban agriculture. Stokes said it has been a very positive experience and a good learning opportunity for his kids. Stokes invited anyone who would like to do a site visit to his home. Hanus said he did research to try to find any opposing opinions. Hanus stated NBC news reported the number of chickens is exploding and that they get abandoned. A rescue in Minneapolis said they hoped that the fad had peaked. Minneapolis had 1500 permitted chickens with 500 in a rescue. Cities were warned to budget for enforcement and rescue. Hanus stated there is a 50/50 chance a chick will be a rooster so there are frequent enforcement issues if roosters are banned. CBS news stated roosters are typically not allowed because the crowing is a nuisance and 1 in 20 chicks are a rooster. In summary, Hanus said it is growing into an issue in a lot of areas and he is not crazy about the idea. Hanus stated his research recommended permitting and licensing each bird. Mound City Council Minutes — April 22, 2014 Hanus complemented the Staff research but said it contains estimates. Hanus said the City of Woodland recently approved chickens but required two (2) acre lots. Hanus said he is aware of 12 cities that allow chickens meaning that three times more don't allow them in the metro area. Stokes pointed out it comes down to the owner because many dogs and cats get abandoned too. Hanus said the City has to deal with all of types of owners and has to anticipate the problems including neighbors not getting along or irresponsible owners. Mound has smaller lots than most cities that allow them. Hanus said you can't connect chickens to dogs. Stokes said a pet is a pet and it is based on the owner. Hanus said a similar argument was made during the discussion on alpacas but the Council has to determine whether to consider it a farm animal or a pet. Hanus believes raising them for eggs makes them a farm animal. Hanus said allowing chickens will drive a lot of changes to the code and that it is a major undertaking, although he does not believe that is a reason not to do it. Salazar said chickens are a farm animal and the decision by the Mound City Council in 1960 to become a City with typical pets and not farm animals should be honored. Salazar said the challenge is where to draw the line and said Staff has already dealt with enforcement issues with farm animals. Gillispie said she has been approached by residents on the subject outside of the Council meetings. The majority of them are not in favor. Hanus said, similar to the alpaca issue, is that chickens are farm animals that make a decent pet. The question is whether you want to allow one or more farm animals. Hanus believes if it is allowed more people would take it up and more issues that we are currently not dealing with will occur. Hanus said permit and licensing issues and correlated costs would need to be covered in the fees. Salazar asked what animal would be proposed next. He quoted an August 2013 Star Tribune article that two alligators where being kept as pets in Washington County, Minnesota. Salazar asked for the City Council to consider the change made in 1960 and that the CSO does not need more enforcement issues. Hanus asked about the list of cities that allow chickens who do not have agricultural zones. He referenced the town of Mayer, Minnesota, who only allows them in the agriculture zones. Hanus said the current code explicitly does not allow chickens. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Hanus, to direct staff to prepare a zoning and code amendment confirming that chickens are not allowed in the City of Mound. The following voted in favor: Gillispie, Salazar, Hanus, and Gesch. The following voted against: Wegscheid. The following abstained: None. Motion carried. 11. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussionfaction authorizing submittal of comment lefter to the Metropolitan Council regarding the Thrive MMSP 2040 draft local forecasts for the City of Mound. Trapp highlighted the particular parts of the Thrive MMSP 2040 plan that are relevant to Mound. Mound has been classified as suburban and the City will need to update the Comprehensive Plan as to how the City will meet the revised goals. Trapp said the increase in overall density may change from 3 — 5 units per acre to 5 units per acre. Hanus asked how other cities are dealing with this. Some cities are building high density and that Mound does not have enough area. Hanus stated he is concerned that the unelected Met Council has virtual veto authority on city projects. Hanson stated there is a disparity between Mound City Council Minutes — April 22, 2014 demanding dense housing without providing for transportation and jobs and that one requires the other. Trapp said Mound is showing less population but has to grow the total number of households since there are less people per household than in the past. Trapp said planners are trying to challenge the Met Council to look regionally and recognize the difference between communities. Wegscheid asked what the consequence of not meeting the requirements is. Hanus said the Met Council has to approve our Comp Plan and it is a negotiation to get to an agreement. Salazar asked if there are any penalties or fines. Hanson said the City may lose out on livable communities grants that have been a real source of funding in the past and the City should be concerned about maintaining the relationship with Met Council. Trapp said that is why Staff is participating in all initiations to provide feedback. Hanus asked who is our current representative and Hanson said it has not changed. Trapp said this exercise is to give feedback on the overall goals and principals and asked if the City Council is comfortable with the content of her proposed letter and whether or not anything needs to be added. Trapp said the deadline is the end of April. Trapp said the main question is how the average density requirements will be applied. Hanson asked if City Council would like the language strengthened and the Council agreed. Trapp thanked the Council for their support. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to direct Staff to strengthen the language of the letter and submit to the Metropolitan Council by the deadline. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 12 Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager: Kandis Hanson stated Staff will participate in 'Developer Day' that will take place on Monday, April 28th at Ehlers & Associates. Discussions will center on the Harbor District area in Mound. Mark Hanus gave an update on the TIF bill currently at the legislature and that it will most likely result in three additional years, not five. B. Minutes: C. Reports: MWCD 2013 Year in Review Harbor Wine & Spirits — March 2014 D. Correspondence: Resignation of Todd Peterson from Parks & Open Space Commission 13. Adiourn MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch to adjourn at 10:13 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk r-140 Mayor Mark Hanus fMOUNT FIRE D IPAR IMENT TGTC�.l AMOUNT CiUE /? 24 IS C!vc � f Mound, NIN 5S364 —_- �.;;,/� P!iorw: (9!2)4/20555 Fax: 19S2i4723/75 j APPLICAIJON FOR P114fv11TS SUB -LC1 W Flk£ INSPLUIONS CHECK BOX OF PERMIT(S) APPYING FOR; Tent, Canopies &.Membrane Structures.rspc tar Ban Fire `or Spec al. Evert ?fee - $2Sf Retall m Specia, Edect (Fee - $25j " Open Flame or Candles i!- Assemb,y Area 1Fee - 525) Temporary Heathy and; o+ LP Usage SFee $2S) Temporary Assemb y or OCtupancy IPee - $251 Fire IrspGr_'tlUnCheck „W—tt ava11au1e fqr tie abuye-perrmts: 11^ppl,cant or &.noes,, Name: _ Ciuy—. ()-F-11-1e _1 . - - - - _ Contact Per,00n(,$) _ rr.� No:.. IP)L-3�•3694 r -jNn E rna il'f'�c EVENTINFORMAT1Dtt Event Gzte4si _. Start Ti*'e, p m12.11 _.__. 00¢q%A Event Location i . Area to be used: v u t ,t Attendance ADD D Day of Event Contact Person:_ �'D l 0_� Cell No. (0 (% •j [�°) 33” The fol!ow,ng rtorm alien must accompany tie permit apo ication term when apply: rig for an operatznal permit: "FOR TENT PERMIT, APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE THE FOLL04'ONG' Type of Strucl��re _ b'�` __ Size of Strwwo: V D -)�., Z-zq Does the structure have enclosed sides_ Yes No —. _ _ -, -- Proof of flame - resistant treatment of your tent or membrane structure bet NFPA 741 �- teas e d Fvt�vv� t,tW i r'a le- � ✓�� � The permits effective Por the above dzte(o- }. For qu�stiors regarding Fire Permits, cab 9., sys—s . The undersigned hereby agrees fiat al= ,rtcrmabon on this applicaton is true and co•rert, and that they shah comp:y vr.th all appfcab +e cty ord,rarces. state and fcderal rules, and tie rulings of the tvleund Fire Code Ott cia:. App:icants Signatt.re: D 'l D 1 a Cc - __ Date. I I A4 Approved By:._._.__._.___- ___.__. -.... .._.__.____ -.. -.. ... T,tle.._ ,,Ir ^O: q:n... � I ,..,PC1, .¢, r ;,..,ntr.r Cq:ut nrrt.10> i _. hate: _ _..... _,.__. - -... xmN�esm�grtrnennarn oeeaaue snecx " Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 444 Cedar Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651- 201 -7500 Fax 651- 297 -5259 TTY 651- 282 -6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization rDate organized jTax exempt number Address City State Zip Code 4 ___7 Minnesota C� Name of person making application Business phone Home phone Date set ups will be sold Type of organization o`' cpClub ❑ Charitable ❑ Religious ❑ Other non - profit name LocatioMhere permit w II be used. If an outdoor area, � C,C� r - describe.0P "� NA/ e— J State Zip Minnesota t Gj If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and a dress f the liquor license providing the service. /�fb If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. �� I F j %� i2 ✓ t >���J %% tt(�'G� �/ C2l a� c7 �> :ry APPROVAL APP ICA ON MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT ova= ►nt ne� n City /County Date Approved C'ty Fee Amount Permit Date 51( ., Date Fee Paid -Signature City City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement NOTE: Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and /or county to the address above_ If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the permit for the event. -892 Page 1 of } Executive Summary TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: May 8, 2014 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 14 -02 Setback Variances Request REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant, Mr. Grant Johnson of Suncrest Builders, is requesting that the City of Mound approve a front yard setback variance of 10.8 feet and a rear yard setback variance of 10 feet to allow the replacement of the existing home and detached garage at 1728 Finch Lane with a new home with an attached garage. According to Hennepin County records, the 8,345 square foot property has an existing home that was built in 1920 and does not conform to existing setback requirements. The applicant was previously granted a 9.8 front yard setback variance and a 10 foot rear yard setback variance in Resolution No. 13 -104 adopted in November of 2013. City Council members are advised that copies of the 2013 variance application, Planning Reports and related materials are available and can be provided upon request. After further design work, the applicant has found the previously granted front yard setback variance is not sufficient and is requesting an increased front yard setback variance. The applicant indicates in the narrative provided that they have been unable to reduce the width of the home as required by the previous variances while meeting the owners' desire for it to be accessible. The reduced house width was required to ensure a 5 foot rear yard setback and sufficient fire separation. The applicant is proposing to cantilever a portion of the house one foot over the west wall to accommodate the size of hallway needed between the bedroom and kitchen. The redesign will also result in a two -foot reduction in the overall length of the house. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their May 5, 2014 meeting and recommended unanimously for its approval. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request at the direction of the City Attorney, Staff has prepared a resolution that will replace the previous resolution adopted in November of 2013. Staff recommends approval of the resolution including the conditions and findings of fact. 123.893 -Chird Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XXX RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR 1728 FINCH LANE PID #13- 117 -24 -13 -0018 WHEREAS, the applicant, Mr. Grant Johnson, submitted a request on behalf of the property owner, Mr. Jeffrey Jesberg, for variances to allow for the construction of a new home at 1728 Finch Lane; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -1A single - family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the R -1A single - family residential zoning district requires a 20 foot front yard setback and a 15 foot rear yard setback; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to replace the existing nonconforming house and detached garage on the property; and WHEREAS, the property is an odd shaped lot located at the terminus of Finch Lane that only has a depth of 40 feet along the portion adjacent to Finch Lane; and WHEREAS, home site locations are also limited by the 50 foot setback from the ordinary high water level and the presence of a water utility line between the 50 foot setback and the terminus of Finch Lane; and WHEREAS, the applicant seeks the following setbacks for this project: EK Required Existing Proposed Variance Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 8,345 sq. ft. 8,345 sq. ft. - Front Yard 20 feet 7' 3" 9.2' 10.8' Rear Yard 15 feet 4'3" 5' 10' Side Yard 6 feet 3'8" 12' - (northeast) Hardcover 3,338 sq. ft. 1,517 sq. ft. 1,832 sq. ft. (maximum 40 %) EK WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ;and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; and (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. MKS WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variances for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report dated April 30, 2014 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variances subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variances were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its May 6, 2014 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the variances as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The construction of a single- family home with an attached garage is a reasonable use of the property and will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. It is further reasonable that the property owner wants to construct an accessible home to accommodate someone with limited mobility. The variance is requested due to circumstances unique to the property and not due to the actions of the applicant. The lot depth of 40 feet near Finch Lane is half of what is required by City Code. 4. The applicant has minimized the variance requested by cantilevering only a portion of the west wall of the home. The applicant has also reduced the home length by two feet. 5. Setbacks on the property will be improved as both the front and rear setbacks have been increased. In addition, the project will eliminate the existing nonconforming side yard setback. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variances with the following conditions: The variance hereby replaced the variances approved by Resolution No. 13 -104 that was adopted by the City Council on November 12, 2013. 2. Applicant and owner shall comply with all requirements from the Public Works Department related to the required work on the public sanitary sewer line including, but not lot limited to, sleeving the existing sewer line that is located within the 15 -foot public easement that bisects the property. Applicant or owner shall be responsible for payment of all involved costs related to the required utility work. Applicant or owner shall also be responsible for coordinating work with the Public Works Director or designee including all required permitting. No utility work is authorized until approval is granted by the Public Works Director or designee. Site, utilities, and drainage plans shall be subject to review and comment by the City Engineer and Public Works Director or their designee. Site runoff cannot be directed towards adjacent properties. The use of gutters for the project shall be required. 4. Applicant and owner shall be responsible for payment of all costs incurred by the City that are associated with this application. 5. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 6. Applicant and owner shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 7. Applicant and owner shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits. 8. The applicant and owner shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. 9. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 10. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the MCWD by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 11. The applicant and owner are solely responsible for any negative impact on the utility service to the adjoining parcels. 12. Applicant and owner are advised that the perpetual easement for public sewer and other utility purposes, including the right to open, lay out, construct, maintain, and service the same and the right to remove trees, brush and soil there from over, under and across the Southwesterly 15 feet of the Northerly 42.5 feet of Lot 12, Block 12. Block 14, Dreamwood is in force. MOM 13. The applicant and owner are advised that City has the right to undertake whatever means necessary to gain access to its underground utilities and that the home to be constructed over the City's easement may be significantly impacted should the City need to exercise its easement rights. 14. The City may require the applicant and owner to indemnify and hold the City harmless prior to the issuance of a building permit for this property which will be recorded. If a hold harmless agreement is required, it shall be prepared by the City Attorney with all costs to be paid by the applicant or owner. If there is a mortgage on the property, written consent from all lien holders will be required. 15. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property: Lot 12, Block 14, DREAMWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof Hennepin County, Minnesota, including adjacent part of Wiota Common lying between the southwesterly extension of the centerline of Finch Lane and the southwesterly extension of the east line of said Lot 12. Adopted by the City Council this 13th of May 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 6. 2014 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist & Pete Wiechert. Staff present: Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd); Art & Barb King (2964 Pelican Point Cir); Loren Pellet (5660 Sunnybrook Cir); Matt Van Nelson (2925 Meadow La); Grant Johnson (6347 Bay Ridge Rd) BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 14 -03 Variance 1728 Finch Lane Trapp reviewed the previous variances Johnson, Suncrest Builders pproved in 2013. Variances of 10.8 feet front and 10 foot rear yard setback were reviewed by Tripp. The previous variance was deemed to be insufficient and they_are requesting anotherfoot of variance to the front yard setback. The existing home had a front yard setback of 7 feet, a rear yard setback of 4 feet and a side yard setback of 3 feet. Even with the requested variance the proposed setbacks are improving. .The lot depth is substantia)Iy.less than -required. There is an existing water line running,betvveen the.lake and the.proposed, house. 'The applicant has taken the views of the neighbors' into consideration. Another part ofthe,challenge is designing accessibility for the lifetime of:the owners. There is also a sewer line that is proposed to remain under the garage portion of the house. It will be sleeved and properly supported. Staff is recommending approval with the same conditions from the previous variance. Findings include: construction of.a single family home with attached garage is reasonable; a lot depth of 40 feet is half of what is required,• cantilevered only part of west wall; reduced length of home by 2 feet; setbacks requested are better than existing. Gawtry and Goode questioned the accessibility design when there are 10 steps up to the front door. Trapp indicated that the applicant Mr. Johnson can address this.Grant Johnson (6347 Bay Ridge Rd) said that the intent is to install a ramp in the garage in the future. The house was shrunk a fair amount to increase the garage size for that purpose. Susan Gardner (1724 Finch La) questioned if the west setback was changing. Trapp indicated it would stay the same. Gardner asked about expense regarding the sewer and who was paying for it. Trapp said the applicant is paying for it. Gardner was curious as to why the house had 2 MORE levels if it was to be accessible. Trapp said all the living can be on the main level. One level has everything they need. Gardner also wanted to know which direction the roof would go for drainage. Johnson indicated that it would drain toward their house but that gutters will be required. The existing sanitary sewer line the runs under the proposed garage was discussed. Retterath noted that there were trees between houses. Gardner said that they were essentially on the property line and that their removal was not that big a deal if Jesberg is paying to take them down. Retterath asked Johnson how deep the basement floor was from grade. Johnson said it was about 8 feet. Retterath talked about the effect oftree removal and protecting the foundations during construction. MOTION by Wegscheid, second by Stone, to support staff recor unanimously. •II ation. MOTION carried V nAA CI'fl' Ofi MQUND _. TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BACKGROUND Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director April 30, 2014 14 -02 Variance Mr. Grant Johnson of Suncrest Builders 1728 Finch Lane (PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -13 -0018) R -1A Single Family Residential Low Density Residential K The applicant, Mr. Grant Johnson of Suncrest Builders, is requesting that the City of Mound approve a front yard setback variance of 10.8 feet and a rear yard setback variance of 10 feet to allow the replacement of the existing home and detached garage at 1728 Finch Lane with a new home with an attached garage. The applicant was previously was granted a 9.8 front yard setback variance and a 10 foot rear yard variance in Resolution No. 13 -104 adopted in November of 2013. Planning Commission members are advised that copies of the 2013 variance application, Planning Reports and related materials are available and can be provided upon request. After further design work, the applicant has found the previously granted front yard setback variance is not sufficient and is requesting an increased front yard setback variance. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner, in evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be pf_9g1_ad when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS The variance application was submitted on March 27, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be March 28, 2014. SITE INFORMATION The applicant is requesting the variances on behalf of the property owner, Mr. Jeffrey Jesberg. According to Hennepin County records, the 8,345 square foot property has an existing home that was built in 1920 and does not conform to existing setback requirements. The property is an odd shaped lot located at the terminus of Finch Lane on Harrison Bay. The front of the lot is considered the northwest side as it is the only part located on an improved public street. The depth of the lot along Finch Lane is only 40 feet. The placement of the home and attached garage on the lot are limited due to the 50 foot setback from the ordinary high water line, as well as the presence of a water utility line between the 50 foot setback and the terminus of Finch Lane. The applicant indicates in the attached narrative that they have been unable to reduce the width of the home as required by the previous variances while meeting the owners' need for it to be accessible. The reduced house width was required to ensure a 5 foot rear yard setback and sufficient fire separation. The applicant is proposing to cantilever a portion of the house one foot over the west wall to accommodate the size of hallway needed between the bedroom and kitchen. The redesign will also result in a two -foot reduction in the overall length of the house. EM PROPOSED DIMENSIONS CITY /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved departments, consultants, agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: Melissa Manderschied, City Attorney Kandis Hanson, City Manager Dan Faulkner, City Engineer Correy Farniok, Orono Police Chief Scott Qualle, Building Official DISCUSSION The parcel is part of the Dreamwood settlement agreement. Recommend a reference in the Planning Report and resolution include mention that the requested variance does not violate the agreement. If the 2013 resolution was recorded, then I would recommend the 2014 approval be an amendment that references the 2013 approval and specifically include the document number following recording. Appears the 2014 request is for the cantilever on the shortened side and doesn't otherwise alter or amend any of the other terms of the 2013 resolution. I have no comments /concems. 1 have no concerns with this request. No issues. I have no comments. The applicant is seeking to replace the existing 1920 home and detached garage with anew two -story home with attached garage. o The shape of the lot limits the ability of the property owner to construct a home without a variance. The presence of the waterline through the property limits the ability of the property owner -90- Required Existing Proposed Proposed Variance 11/2013 412014 Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 8,345 sq. ft. 8,345 sq. ft. 8,345 sq. ft. - Front Yard 20 feet 7.25' 10.2' 9.2' 10.8' Rear Yard 15 feet 4.25' 5' 5' 10' Side Yard (northeast) 6 feet 3.75' 10' 12' - Hardcover (maximum 40 %) 3,338 sq. ft. 1,517 sq. ft. 1,862 sq. ft. 1,832 sq. ft. CITY /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved departments, consultants, agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: Melissa Manderschied, City Attorney Kandis Hanson, City Manager Dan Faulkner, City Engineer Correy Farniok, Orono Police Chief Scott Qualle, Building Official DISCUSSION The parcel is part of the Dreamwood settlement agreement. Recommend a reference in the Planning Report and resolution include mention that the requested variance does not violate the agreement. If the 2013 resolution was recorded, then I would recommend the 2014 approval be an amendment that references the 2013 approval and specifically include the document number following recording. Appears the 2014 request is for the cantilever on the shortened side and doesn't otherwise alter or amend any of the other terms of the 2013 resolution. I have no comments /concems. 1 have no concerns with this request. No issues. I have no comments. The applicant is seeking to replace the existing 1920 home and detached garage with anew two -story home with attached garage. o The shape of the lot limits the ability of the property owner to construct a home without a variance. The presence of the waterline through the property limits the ability of the property owner -90- to place the home significantly toward the shoreline. The placement closer to Finch Lane will also minimize view obstruction by the house to the neighbor's property. • The applicant has tried to minimize the variance by only cantilevering a portion of the west wall instead of the entire length. • The applicant has reduced the side yard setback by 2 feet as part of the house redesign. • A sewer line bisects the property to serve the adjacent property to the east. As part of the previous approval process the applicant worked with the City to identify a way of reconstructing the sewer line so that the proposed home and garage could be built over it. This reconstruction should continue to be required as part of the variance approval process. • Requested variance does not violate the 2006 Dreamwood settlement agreement. • Resolution No. 13 -104, a copy of which is attached, was not released for recording. It is the recommendation of the City Attorney that if the variance is to be approved then the previous resolution be rescinded and a new variance resolution that encompasses both the front and rear setback variance be adopted. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve a 10.8 foot front yard setback variance and 10 foot rear setback variance for this site subject to the following conditions: 1. This variance hereby replaces the variances approved by Resolution No. 13 -104 that was adopted by the City Council on November 12, 2013. 2. Applicant and owner shall comply with all requirements from the Public Works Department related to the required work on the public sanitary sewer line including but not lot limited to, sleeving the existing sewer line that is located within the 15 -foot public easement that bisects the property. Applicant or owner shall be responsible for payment of all involved costs related to the required utility work. Applicant or owner shall also be responsible for coordinating work in with the Public Works Director or designee including all required permitting. No utility work is authorized until approval is granted by the Public Works Director or designee. 3. Site, utilities, and drainage plans shall be subject to review and comment by the City Engineer and Public Works Director or their designee. Site runoff cannot be directed towards adjacent properties. The use of gutters for the project shall be required. 4. Applicant and owner shall be responsible for payment of all costs incurred by the City that are associated with this application. 5. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 6. Applicant and owner shall provide all required information upon submittal of the .e, building permit application. 7. Applicant and owner shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits. 8. The applicant and owner shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. 9. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 10. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the MCWD by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 11. The applicant and owner are solely responsible for any negative impact on the utility service to the adjoining parcels. 12. Applicant and owner are advised that the perpetual easement for public sewer and other utility purposes, including the right to open, lay out, construct, maintain and service the same and the right to remove trees, brush and soil therefrom over, under and across the Southwesterly 15 feet of the Northerly 42.5 feet of Lot 12, Block 12. Block 14, Dreamwood is in force. 13. The applicant and owner are advised that City has the right to undertake whatever means necessary to gain access to its underground utilities and that the home to be constructed over the City's easement may be significantly impacted should the City need to exercise its easement rights. 14. The City may require the applicant and owner to indemnify and hold the City harmless prior to the issuance of a building permit for this property which will be recorded. If a hold harmless agreement is required, it shall be prepared by the City Attorney with all costs to be paid by the applicant or owner. If there is mortgage on the property, written consent from all lienholders will be required. -9Q5- 15. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property: Lot 12, Block 14, DREAMWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, including adjacent part of Wioto Common lying between the southwesterly extension of the centerline of Finch lane and the southwesterly extension of the east line of said Lot 12. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The construction of a single - family home with an attached garage is a reasonable use of the property and will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. It is further reasonable that the property owner wants to construct an accessible home that can accommodate someone with limited mobility. 3. The variance is requested due to circumstances unique to the property and not due to the actions of the applicant. The lot depth of 40 feet near Finch Lane is half is what is required by City Code. 4. The applicant has minimized the variance requested by cantilevering only a portion of the west wall of the home. The applicant has also reduced the home length by 2 feet. 5. Setbacks on the property will be improved as both the front and rear setbacks have been increased. In addition, the project will eliminate the existing nonconforming side yard setback. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, It is anticipated that the variance request will be reviewed at an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time, possible dates are Tuesday, May 13, 2014 or Tuesday, May 27, 2014. NO Mil 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620 Application Fee and scrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date 1� Case No. City Council Date 2 ;7 IZ Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address 12Z-9 6i ic4 L4 ,2P, Lot 2 Block PROPERTY LEGAL DESC. (/ Subdivision t- 'ea./Vt 1,Jr�n (i / 2-q-13-400 PID #, I � 11 l �7 - 10 p Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 B1 B2 B3 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name J2 Ah Email OWNER Address -2 7:Z9' F/rnc44 tsna Amiid Phone HomeKZ- / 71_- 74/1 Work Fax APPLICANT Nam6uncru6 gargor"S %�t,��l�ndovr Emaii i0�]nS��1n�WCtwSacrllomkel i cpvy (IF OTHER Address_5_/-r�A;;i '9¢ Qox 382 �� /Cl7/I �I��l /h /m/ �✓�35� THAN OWNER) G Home 2 -Zdj- l� Work7%(3-y7 ?- ssS✓�Fax Phone �1 76; V7f s 53"0 4 Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes X No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 3 2— 71-17 or alteration stories, type of use, etc.): b" s %vlvti/v b ?wee f gs s6awh irr a1ic�erL �r.�R�r� Variance Information (10/2112013) Page 4 of 6 -907- Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (>�. If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: Front Yard: ( N S E/�N ) Side Yard: ( ®S EW ) Side Yard: (NSEW) Rear Yard: (N S W ) Lakeside: ( N ®E W ) (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: Oko -INUM11 �Ci ft. ft. u# ft. ft. k6 0 sq ft 33.3,?-sq ft REQUESTED VARIANCE S�fibau�i (or existing 3 E%i5� {0.2 w�m in vRr 13- ) ft. M, S? ft. ft. ON ft. ft. ft. �3ys sq ft sq ft ft. ft. eft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes), No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation �) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: ? v �r0 _Yi e-�"�'r r t' ,Vn /' 41/) Variance Information (10/21/2013) Page 5 of 6 -90$- Case No. 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No A. If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (". If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (X), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Information (10/21/2013) Page 6 of 6 -909- Date f Date 3 /Z /L_ Second Variance Application Jesberg 1728 Finch Lane - The Practical Difficulties associated with the current variance application for the Jesberg property at 1728 Finch Lane are a result of the previous requirement to narrow the overall house width to 25 feet to maintain a 5 foot rear (east) set back. This further constrained what was already a tight house, and resulted in the need for a small one foot cantilevered overhang on the west wall of the house to ensure safe interior passage in the bedroom, hallway and kitchen for someone with limited mobility. Mr. Jesberg is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner permitted by the zoning ordinance (single family residential home), his plight is due to circumstances unique to this property and not of his doing (unusual lot shape), and the variance requested will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Granting the requested variance will not confer on Mr. Jesberg any special privileges denied to other landowners in the area, nor will it be materially detrimental to other properties in the area. On the contrary, construction of a new home should help enhance both the aesthetic and market values of the neighboring properties. The requested front and rear yard variances are the minimum variances necessary to still ensure off - street parking in front of Mr. Jesberg's (already shallow) garage, to ensure adequate fire clearances from the neighboring property (as per a discussion with Building Official Scott Qualle), and to ensure minimal internal clearances for passage between rooms.. The requested variance should be granted as the resulting new home will be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance, and remains consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. in addition, the proposed left (north) side yard setback is further improved from the previously approved variance, the proposed lakeshore setback remains the same and in compliance, the rear yard setback remains the same, and the front yard setback remains the same as measured from the foundation, with only a portion of the main floor wall cantilevered just one foot.. Lastly, the existing utility easement was reviewed with Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson, and a plan devised to replace the existing sewer line to allow for building the new home as proposed. Suncrest Builders - 4 -17 -14 Grant Johnson, Co -owner M11 i a • N s � y :9`y mm ro ,N d d o o d �Q o I` Eti d Emd C Q d y C N W �'S Z• oil,s� O � r N / a � m P"' ;60 ° ry OSJ J��v�7 b n' L Ile IV 'Zilz lip 8 %YJ 90. 08 a. ex Nlq. %wV I sy S kgy6 � _ m q ig m BO�j y .6 -il/ L oy b o � 4 79, $ �y yONNp SN Nib 1N 1 r O N Q Q mm Q f6 G 0 =�= �% w z w •p m o (=C o m o o !i oU z-%J _ Y, +� U CV = m c a" m i.S U � U O C � E 'C �.. •G .Oj 0 LL co = hU s cll •.e�i�C.a�C.�4i +! m w w U COA h'/ 3 ss / O aQ k3 .. / / zlzl 1Sbc' A. m. /` O / $ / / / 3 fA X / C^ i X "O-x O CN V, M 00 M r` N N O U 0 Q c.,' v 5 w N a 4c _ Z Q � o /�&0 V fR# r \ �000 J C Z 00 O N r N v a � E O s o s O O c 0.. O t- O O r y O _ m a p w p.. t (�6 ° Q 1 00 E ° m u. U U U U U U 0 a= Q Z a P M CV) W (5 Q X a 0 ® o W O J y h h h O aQ k3 .. / / zlzl 1Sbc' A. m. /` O / $ / / / 3 fA X / C^ i X "O-x O CN V, M 00 M r` N N O U 0 Q c.,' v 5 w N a 4c _ Z Q � o /�&0 V fR# r \ �000 J �U o r—t z o M L1� � � H � a Z m m 3 w � 0) U) o N N a w w p W H N t Q N W r c O M N a a W 2 £ Z G°W c �~ W M Q t2 m Cl) (L)CO iz r N N O 3 � N Z 00 O d r N v a � � U O cL Cl) J OL , a a > y L V1 C a= Q a P M CV) N N a a 0 0 o C83 O y h h h N S M W �U o r—t z o M L1� � � H � a Z m m 3 w � 0) U) o N N a w w p W H N t Q N W r c O M N a a W 2 £ Z G°W c �~ W M Q t2 m Cl) (L)CO iz r N N O 3 � N N b .YC7 U m q w w 5- T b N $oqrA v y 00 O d r N v a N b .YC7 U m q w w 5- T b N $oqrA v y RIGHT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION U.B. copyright law protects original works of authorship, including architectural plans and drawings, as soon as they are first put on paper or some other tangible medium, su - gives the owner exclusive rights to display, distribute, reproduce and modify the plans /drawings, and the exclusive right to use the plans or drawings to construct a building. We are able to offer Wausau Homes plans under a license that allows us to construct homes based on these plans, and distribute certain copies for limited purposes relating to our construction of a home. You have been given permission to use these plans /drawings solely in connection with hiring us to construct a home based on these plans /drawings. Any other use of Wausau Homes plans, such as providing them to another builder or modifying the plans without permission is prohibited. Even viewing the plans to draw a new, substantially similar plan is a violation of copyright law because copyright protects the expression of an idea, and notjust a particular physical copy of a plan or drawing. Unauthorized use of copyrighted plans or drawings can lead to significant damages, and a violator may be required to pay the copyright owner for any damages caused and any profits earned by the violator, or in some circumstances may be hiM, nc ,tirn nnn mar nlan nr rtrnwinn ,,.cart in nn irnnermissible way. In addition, willfully making impermissible use of copyrighted plans and drawings can lead to criminal prosecution. Wall Bracing FOUNDATION PLAN /LOWER LEVEL (COTES a .e.�.�.n'•a..rc.aw +ru'•tr.ru..rn. c... cv<oux,xo s = r, e� ,c•w.x,�n ^re......,,,.ab.ab... x .e +n••..°wa„a�.x..xa.. future Finished Footage: 497 8' -0" FOUNDATION WALL Dimensions are Framing to Framing `r.�pw 8 wISrRW Bolb B'oc. .rwk�+na "�a...a..t....umre4ana •ra.wwtp^•s an.®...6wb 6 P orea Wa1 Q 46' 515 eed � ::enwm`uu`: `e. �v °.zwimnxo w+:wa.a:a..°�,.ew°r�ra •�.o.o�u�w.e.r d P metl Cancrele Fleor ^COnBnucus 16k8 ComTete footing - cwrey.tr.maw,w.x'.b.ixneenw tom.�x ®� 5W,[ rm.a.aYw•, rmm.eetr ,wW trrnu�nna•t.iW en„pvbo �aw•�>L4C y..xusc ..ansrcu.F�wo ':>awwm'x<n+emwdena... w...ab .e�w�s.ssst. ea.e.`+:mmte•m xa,e.., rn" ut•� bw r.. x.we. nni.y.r 1fi+°ss W`� ml.rgw. i...aww+.= ".FC.®azvml tm mw... b.w.aa.blbN•br b as.bn 1¢- @,,- W Watch D , W.wpr..t% ^113 Fu dWO ^3" Poured Concrete Fbor ^Cortruom 16Y8 "nonc101 Footln "4 "Dram Tile W BkeMra 8'- B "o.c. Coveretl W Brevet aggregate 2�D SECTION A -A SECTION C -C Scale: le" = 1'-IY' SECTION B -B is6 Treetea Pkte M S Boh 8'oc. 4 P.wIe ..kr 4" Pouretl Concrete Fbor Poured gi 18" W Watcatc h BaB Wahryuoofing R -13 Fmratl Wal C.Rtr aCencre,e Fbor 4 Draious 1fi Y8 "ConcMeFooting 4-orelni8a Na e8' -0'b c. - o...vered Hgravel e8gregale 'a H 5la. .2d"C.... f' Avaa "4 "Pou dCOnnete Fbor -Wag ConsWdr ^2of Treat dPlale WPn 'Botls 'S115eakr AS Poured Wa1QB4e M' Pomea Concrete Floor 'C.uRR us 16'x8' Concrete F..6R, SECTION D -D Scak: 3 6" =I -6 'Wal COnsWaeon ^2x6 Knee -a 48" "2x6 Treated d Pkt e W Mchm BoYa B' a.c. PSkr 8 ^"o.'uretl Ql8" W Watch Bop ., Waterproofing "R -13 Fmretl WA ^3"Pomea 16e Ste Fbor -4' Draumu 16)8 'Concrete FooEng "4" Drzinille W Bkeaers B' -g" re a eo.erea W eravel egeregate SECTION E -E Scak: 3!8 " =1'-0 U.S. copyright taw protects original works of authorship, including architectural plans and drawings, as soon as they are first put on paper or some other tangible medium, such as a CD -ROM or computer hard drive. A copyright gives the owner exclusive rights to display, distribute, reproduce and modify the plans /drawings, and the exclusive right to use the plans or drawings to construct a building. We are able to offer Wausau Homes plans under a license that allows us to construct homes based on these plans, and distribute certain copies for limited purposes relating to our construction of a home. You have been given permission to use these plans /drawings solely in connection with hiring us to construct a home based on these plans /drawings. Any other use of Wausau Homes plans, such as providing them to another builder or modifying the plans without permission is prohibited. Even viewing the plans to draw a new, substantially similar plan is a violation of copyright law because copyright protects the expression of an idea, and not just a particular physical copy of a plan or drawing. Unauthorized use of copyrighted plans or drawings can lead to significant damages, and a violator may be required to pay the copyright owner for any damages caused and any profits earned by the violator, or in some circumstances may be PQnY Yirari fn nav statutory damages as high as $150.000 per clan or drawino used in an impermissible way. In addition, willfully making impermissible use of copyrighted plans and drawings can lead to criminal prosecution. tIY' 51 - -. -. '16 Treatedb �w 8 wISrRW Bolb B'oc. \ 6 P orea Wa1 Q 46' 515 eed \Y d P metl Cancrele Fleor ^COnBnucus 16k8 ComTete footing SECTION C -C Scale: le" = 1'-IY' SECTION B -B is6 Treetea Pkte M S Boh 8'oc. 4 P.wIe ..kr 4" Pouretl Concrete Fbor Poured gi 18" W Watcatc h BaB Wahryuoofing R -13 Fmratl Wal C.Rtr aCencre,e Fbor 4 Draious 1fi Y8 "ConcMeFooting 4-orelni8a Na e8' -0'b c. - o...vered Hgravel e8gregale 'a H 5la. .2d"C.... f' Avaa "4 "Pou dCOnnete Fbor -Wag ConsWdr ^2of Treat dPlale WPn 'Botls 'S115eakr AS Poured Wa1QB4e M' Pomea Concrete Floor 'C.uRR us 16'x8' Concrete F..6R, SECTION D -D Scak: 3 6" =I -6 'Wal COnsWaeon ^2x6 Knee -a 48" "2x6 Treated d Pkt e W Mchm BoYa B' a.c. PSkr 8 ^"o.'uretl Ql8" W Watch Bop ., Waterproofing "R -13 Fmretl WA ^3"Pomea 16e Ste Fbor -4' Draumu 16)8 'Concrete FooEng "4" Drzinille W Bkeaers B' -g" re a eo.erea W eravel egeregate SECTION E -E Scak: 3!8 " =1'-0 U.S. copyright taw protects original works of authorship, including architectural plans and drawings, as soon as they are first put on paper or some other tangible medium, such as a CD -ROM or computer hard drive. A copyright gives the owner exclusive rights to display, distribute, reproduce and modify the plans /drawings, and the exclusive right to use the plans or drawings to construct a building. We are able to offer Wausau Homes plans under a license that allows us to construct homes based on these plans, and distribute certain copies for limited purposes relating to our construction of a home. You have been given permission to use these plans /drawings solely in connection with hiring us to construct a home based on these plans /drawings. Any other use of Wausau Homes plans, such as providing them to another builder or modifying the plans without permission is prohibited. Even viewing the plans to draw a new, substantially similar plan is a violation of copyright law because copyright protects the expression of an idea, and not just a particular physical copy of a plan or drawing. Unauthorized use of copyrighted plans or drawings can lead to significant damages, and a violator may be required to pay the copyright owner for any damages caused and any profits earned by the violator, or in some circumstances may be PQnY Yirari fn nav statutory damages as high as $150.000 per clan or drawino used in an impermissible way. In addition, willfully making impermissible use of copyrighted plans and drawings can lead to criminal prosecution. Fax= su�a:uua_.g ® Pa Ytrm+h.tr�Y,ariRa "kurk. nu.Yfa•vn 6�.L.IL XOT¢5: zuronr> ,. a.maw� k..la..r.a.an...nmy.. �c..,aaatrm.am.aa.mM.e eta M/ ..YYm a.®FameY,wltr mrmar.yk4rtr�F. aWeYlgatlA,65vW rr s6' auxoW 0 rnu®me P..a.a.m......wY ..Y..au•' >......uc.mnmm�xo .m.sas..m.r...oabwm , r....m . ewansw MYUV ka+,vYptlkg4.trtlb N'. .dMml VP'aiWer.(ie]Iiywxq �a.Ym.ak�.a,�ptrame..m.M•.. O uYY.- b.k.O.,a war.Yake...e.m e .�NYa.ru- �1).aac r�m..k.pm aw.ma'mn r�aem.. r+�a,l..eea..e.aere Y.wLmMlChu.itiSG me MU ]5'.M Sptr6nv.auW Vtte p.eq.p .'Lmps.'PryMmvbrbeRma.pmev.tr. .fa FwamsW Rr]r.1}(e,p)tIl W a Y.P�e M.ss,,.M Mm I l.iga,(eyjl. Nlv,tl" ORm W P -k Lrx.ia PM..ISn Omf�e1Y19HE) O (gMlar�1ebWa�rpPmslYgN.1Y ppm Yre a ryir I m r.tle M M N" .Aert rRVela A3rYn. 'l ST FLOOR PLAN Floor Square Footage: 793 Garage Square Footage: 528 NOTES 9' -1 1/8" WALL HEIGHTS Dimensions are Framing to Framing 2ply 2x10 Sel -Strut Headers (u.n.o.) eel CifeT!x 6M1inBles ^VV150 Feb0 r5 /32 "OSM1 SbeaS'ngw CLpa ODE Roo; EOge �12 Per Elev.I Per Elegy s x conaba=5on We,' s1.1 wm Eaa=ia cwar ]Po' AL m SvHi1 Panel GUI Afpn12 "vab W FOVMa6l, TYPICAL WALL SECTION scale: vz^ = r -a' lion Ot i.Feftwrel UraTlmre smngba nse Ean 'All -«oa 5/,P .O SvPIna W CYps 12 pranrv'n OOE RVO Eape r� all elovm HpI&- lreutrtlon Per Elev.l / woMrmsaea lea "o-c) LPer Elev 5� - vo sib -Faa, sc-a wm. Faaaa co.er s'S' A1um soul penal Icvl pupalm mb W Fo�umwa GARAGE WALL SECTION Scale: 172" = 1' -0" m� op 1 l O N C > _aaa 5I0 "SM1eetrvck y0coomol , lmsneee ck SI6 "F.G Sbeebvck�WG Wa® E Oab emri 1 5I3Z 0 16" "rior S� House wap sand 'Basement WaOCOnab�eWn 36 ireema Ph1e MM -Mr Bella B' ou. WPou kr B "POUmtl. —ra. "wl WarcM1 DOg mhProvfilrp 4" Pouretl Cancnb Fbw 6M!PolyvaWrfieMOr Cm @uow 16Xd Cencreb Faobp m2 d Of 2 E �U bmAOn Am PCroper Ven6 fl.5g Blcvn Fibergass lnsubeon woos Tmsaea 12aoy cekna cvaa a�=eo.• sal vapor Ea-aar 510 "$Ileebock yr 12'NO -Sag sM1eetrxk WJ Lueubae 12 "SMetrock &W Vepm8.mor R 21 FIWOhea lauhnon Il aLtls 16'x.0. 15AZ "osa Ftlerior SAeaPinp Hvwe Wrap SNg 'Flaorc uauc4on 2 M OSb Tfl. 6lwaMing Spray fvam5911nsuhlion Opavneli2 "sM1eebock �eaeemnlwauewo-uamn Zb ireabtl PYm wl NwMr BoXa B' o.c. nkr B" Powetl Nhtl � B6 "w/ WaOM1 Dog WaferymoNp R- 1]FUnea Well 3' PoureE ColcnY Fbvr fimll Poly W Wr Bamor cwmnmua 1Bre' conmm Fvwnp r or.m rY wl aYeaa�a 6m a �. cooerea wr ®arol aggrepam U.S. copyright law protects original works of authorship, including architectural plans and drawings, as soon as they are first put on paper or some other tangible medium, Such as a uu -Kum or cornpul tidw uttvc. n l-upyl ly1 t6 gives the owner exclusive rights to display, distribute, reproduce and modify the plans /drawings, and the exclusive right to use the plans or drawings to construct a building. We are able to offer Wausau Homes plans under a license that allows us to construct homes based on these plans, and distribute certain copies for limited purposes relating to our construction of a home. You have been given permission to use these plans /drawings solely in connection with hiring us to construct a home based on these plans /drawings. Any other use of Wausau Homes plans, such as providing them to another builder or modifying the plans without permission is prohibited. Even viewing the plans to draw a new, substantially similar plan is a violation of copyright law because copyright protects the expression of an idea, and notjust a particular physical copy of a plan or drawing. Unauthorized use of copyrighted plans or drawings can lead to significant damages, and a violator may be required to pay the copyright owner for any damages caused and any profits earned by the violator, or in some circumstances may be e rfoRe ,n �« cr�rltrnn, ri�mnnpc nc hinh nQ 1;iti-c;n nnn nor nian nr rirawinn triad in an impermissible way. In addition, willfully making impermissible use of copyrighted plans and drawings can lead to criminal prosecution. O �R e wa � aNn 3mx 1 _ � 1 EB `a c er, GARAGE STAIR DETAIL SCALE: 3/8" = 1' -0" (22x34) 3/16" = 1' -0" (11x17) MOTES 8' -1 1/8" WALL HEIGHTS Dimensions are Framing to Fran 2piy 2x10 Sel -Strut Headers (u. 2ND FLOOR PLAN Ftoor Square Footage: 464 SCALE: 3/8" = 1' -0" (22x34) m 3/16" = 1' -0" (11x17) -- ---- ------ - - - -II i I l I I Roof Plan Vier Scale: 1/8" = 1' -0" (22x34) ---------------- l 1116 " = 1,_0" (11x17) tr - - - -- -- - - - -�� I �I II III -- - — - — - — U.S. copyright law protects original works of authorship, including architectural plans and drawings, as soon as they are first put on paper or some other tangible medium, such as a ✓u K�IVI of wtltN�dcl tla u •�. ^ ��rJ' e'° gives the owner exclusive rights to display, distribute, reproduce and modify the plans /drawings, and the exclusive right to use the plans or drawings to construct a building. We are able to offer Wausau Homes plans under a license that allows us to construct homes based on these plans, and distribute certain copies for limited purposes relating to our construction of a home. You have been given permission to use these plans /drawings solely in connection with hiring us to construct a home based on these plans /drawings. Any other use of Wausau Homes plans, such as providing them to another builder or modifying the plans without permission is prohibited. Even viewing the plans to draw a new, substantially similar plan is a violation of copyright law because copyright protects the expression of an idea, and not just a particular physical copy of a plan or drawing. Unauthorized use of copyrighted plans or drawings can lead to significant damages, and a violator may be required to pay the copyright owner for any damages caused and any profits earned by the violator, or in some circumstances may be k;-k z- C', an nnn . ®r .,tom., ^r nrau,;nn item in nn imnarmicSihle way. In addition, willfully making impermissible use of copyrighted plans and drawings can lead to criminal prosecution. REV2 OATS: REVS GATE: ti c c o m m U) oW 2 —) DBVm By Jess B. Date: 2/14/2014 13x7 SMfe: 29134 Stale: 1' -0" Or L) IV- 14 AM AM AM AM 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD MEMORANDUM May 8, 2014 To: City Mayor and City Council From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Re: Electric and Gas Franchise Fees Request to extend the period for the Sunset Clause At the August 20, 2013 budget workshop, the Council approved, in concept, a two year budget for 2014 and 2015. Both the 2014 and 2015 budgets assumed the City will receive Local Government Aid and electric and gas franchise fees. Electric franchise fees generate $147,000, gas franchise fees $125,000, and cable franchise fees $105,000, a portion of which is given to the LMCC for programming and services. Staff requests the approval of the attached ordinance amending Appendix A of the Mound City Code in order to extend the sunset dates until December 31, 2016. There are publication and communication requirements to extend the sunset date and pushing it out until 2016 instead of 2015 is a recognition the fees cannot be totally eliminated in the near future. The amount of the fees for 2015 and 2016 will be discussed during the budget process and can be amended at any time. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. -917- printed on recycled paper CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -2014 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A. OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO ELECTRIC AND GAS FRANCHISE FEES The City of Mound does ordain: That Appendix A. FRANCHISES, Article 11. ELECTRIC FRANCHISE FEES, Sec. 8 be amended to read as follows: Sec. 8. Sunset Clause. The ordinance from which this article is derived shall automatically sunset on D ° ^° ber 31, 2014 December 31, 2016, unless the City Council acts to renew or extend the fee at least six (6) months prior to the sunset date. The City Council may unilaterally renew or extend the fee on the same terms and conditions. Without waiver of any rights under Minnesota law, the City Council shall seek agreement from company if the city intends to change the fee rate or fee design. That Appendix A. FRANCHISES, Article IV GAS FRANCHISE FEES, Sec. 8 be amended to read as follows: Sec. 8. Sunset Clause. The ordinance from which this article is derived shall automatically sunset on n ^ ^ ^^ beF 41 2014 December 31, 2016, unless the City Council acts to renew or extend the fee at least six (6) months prior to the sunset date. The City Council may unilaterally renew or extend the fee on the same terms and conditions. Without waiver of any rights under Minnesota law, the City Council shall seek agreement from company if the city intends to change the fee rate or fee design. Passed by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2014. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Published in The Laker on the 24th day of May, 2014. Effective on the 25 th day of May, 2014. CITY OF MOUND 7 � .Y�7 i [ iTl l� [ �) ► f [ � AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound has adopted Ordinance No. -2014 amending Appendix A of the Mound City Code as it relates to electric and gas franchise fees; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, subdivision 4, allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances; and WHEREAS, the following summary of Ordinance _ -2014 has been approved by the City Council of the City of Mound as clearly informing the public of the intent and effect of the Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound has reviewed the following summary of the ordinance and approved its publication in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, subdivision 4: Ordinance _ -2014 has been approved by the City Council of the City of Mound. The Ordinance amends Appendix A of the Mound City Code as it relates to electric and gas franchise fees by changing the Sunset Clause dates of December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2016. The electric and gas franchise fees will automatically expire on this date unless the City Council acts to renew or extend the fee at least six (6) months prior to the sunset date. A copy of the full text of the ordinance is available at City Hall and at the Mound Public Library. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk keep a copy of the entire text of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post of the entire text of the ordinance at Westonka Public Library in the City. Passed by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -919- Mayor Mark Hanus Hennepin County Assessor Department To: City of Mound, Mayor and Council From: Kari Kamrath, Appraiser Date: March 10, 2014 612 348 -3046, Phone 612 348 -8751, Fax www.hennepin.us Re: 2014 Assessment and Board of Appeal and Equalization The 2014 Mound Open Book meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 7th, from 5 to 7:00 p.m. In preparation for the upcoming Open Book Meeting, please find the enclosed data to help you. There is market data, explanation of the market conditions adjustment, local board procedures, an alternate method of appeal and sales photos with characteristics from a sample of sales throughout the city. Annual Revaluation, Sales, and New Construction Reviews Each year, one fifth of the properties in the city are reviewed and the records are updated. For the 2014 assessment we viewed all residential and lakeshore properties in the southeast portion of Mound, in section 19, 25 and 30. The lakeshore properties were located on Phelps Bay, Spring Park Bay and a few properties on Cook's Bay (See 2014 Reval Map) The viewing, reviewing, and statistical analysis of all sales that sold between October 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013 in the city of Mound were made. Summary of the 2014 Assessment Each year the estimated market values are analyzed along with sales data from the market. A recalculation of land and building values were made to all property types. The results of the adjustments for the following property types are: Residential +15.8% Condos +17.9% Residential Lakeshore +5.3% Townhouses +9.9% Commercial /Industrial +0.7% Double Bungalow's +16.9% Apartments +3.0% Residential Zero Lot Line +10.0% There are 4,472 taxable parcels in the city with a total market value of approximately $1,059,154,400. This value includes $9,192,500 in new construction improvements. The overall gross value increase for all property types including improvements in the city of Mound is 10.7 %. -920 - 1 The Local Board of Appeal and Equalization and Open Book Processes Value notices will be mailed at the beginning of March. Taxpayers with value or classification concerns should contact the assessor's office. During the initial conversation the property owner may discuss their concerns and review sales information with an appraiser. The majority of the callers are satisfied after a conversation with an appraiser. If additional attention is necessary the appraiser will review the property. The board has the authority to increase, decrease, or take no action on individual valuations. The total reduction must not reduce the aggregate assessment by more than one percent or none of the adjustments will be allowed. The board also, cannot increase or decrease by a percentage of all assessments in a district by class. If the board chooses to reconvene it must do so within 20 days. A majority of the board members are required to attend all local board meetings. Enclosed are additional duties and information for local boards as provided by the Minnesota Property Tax Administrators Manual, which is prepared by the Minnesota Department of Revenue Property Tax Division. The City of Mound has decided to use the alternative method to the formal Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting held by the city council and mayor and hold an informal open book meeting. During an open book meeting, the valuation and classification issues are handled by the assessor's staff on a one -on -one basis with the property owner. The open book meeting allows property owners to address questions about their property assessment directly to the assessing staff. Homeowners should still call the number listed on their value notice in March to address questions and set up interior inspections prior to the open book meeting. If homeowners concerns are addressed prior to the open book meeting and the homeowner is satisfied with the results, the homeowner would not need to attend the open book meeting. If the homeowner is unsatisfied with the results of their property value or classification after speaking with an assessor they can appeal their value to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. In order for a taxpayer to appeal to the county board they must first appeal to the local board either in person or in writing. The County Board of Appeal and Equalization will begin meeting on June 16, 2014. All requests for appointments at the County Board must be received before May 21, 2014. To make an appointment, taxpayers should call 612 - 348 -7050. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Kari Kamrath at 612- 803 -0860. -921 . 2 Market Conditions Adjustment for Sales Ratio Studies March 11, 2014 The purpose of this document is to review the reasons that the market conditions adjustments in sales ratio studies are considered, discuss calculating time trends [TCALC], apply the time trend to the sales in the study period [MCAP], and list additional resources. Market Conditions While the market conditions adjustment is sometimes referred to as a "time" adjustment, time is not the cause for the adjustment. Overtime, changes in interest rates, supply and demand, employment rates, availability of financing, and other factors can create conditions in the market that must be adjusted. Purpose As stated in MS 272.03, subdivision 8, "'Market value' means the usual selling price at the place where the property to which the term is applied shall be at the time of assessment ... and, As stated in MS 273.01, All real property subject to taxation shall be listed ... with reference to their value on January 2 ... Simply put, the assessor is to value all property on January 2nd at the value it would sell considering all market conditions. Assessors value all properties using mass appraisal techniques and one of the measurements of mass appraisal are the numerous statistics derived from sales ratio studies. Sales ratio studies can be of any duration of time but the 12 month State Board ratio is considered the most important in setting and analyzing the annual assessment. In Hennepin County, all of our assessment measurements are set to reflect the State Board 12 month sales ratio. With sales occurring throughout the 12 month study period and the estimated market value being set according to the current market conditions as of January 2nd, by using a market conditions or "time" factor to adjust the sale price to the date of the assessment will reflect any changes in the market. Market conditions adjusted sales prices are also necessary to reduce the distortion that the market can have on ratios and other statistics. Using market conditions adjustments is not only using generally accepted appraisal principals, but the IAAO identifies a "time" adjustment as a necessary component of any sales ratio study and MS 270.12 subd 2 requires the DOR to follow the standards set by the IAAO. For the 2012 assessment the DOR instituted the market conditions adjusted sales ratio methodology for calculating State Board sales ratios for a number of reasons: • MS 278.05 (4) states that sales must be adjusted to reflect the difference in date of sale compared to the assessment date Tax Court ratios already are adjusted for market conditions 21 month state aid ratios already are adjusted for market conditions e Generally accepted appraisal principals indicate that in the sales comparison approach one of the first adjustments considered is for market conditions IAAO standards indentify that time adjustments are necessary for accurate ratio studies e The DOR by statute, must follow IAAO guidelines whenever practical Market Conditions Adjustment for Sales Ratio Studies Page 1 -922- 3 TCALC The market conditions adjustment is determined through a time trend calculator or TCALC. The TCALC is determined by the sales from a 21 month time period that starts 24 months prior to the assessment year under study. For the 2014 assessment, sales from January 2012 through September 2013 are used in the analysis of market conditions. If the jurisdiction has an adequate sample of 30 or more sales and the confidence level of the data is greater than 90% then a time adjustment is applied to the sales in the 12 month State Board study period. These sales are adjusted to the assessment date under study, in this case January 2, 2014, MCAP After the sales are adjusted for market conditions with the appropriate TCALC to determine the market condition adjusted price or MCAP. The MCAP is the adjusted sales price that is used in all sales ratios. What happens if the TCALC is Zero? Several situations can occur to result in a TCALC of zero. The market could be flat with no market condition changes, the confidence level is less than 90.0 %, not an adequate sample, and others. Hennepin County will continue to review assessments based on the preferred MCAP sales ratio analysis and the former method of measuring the direct ratio with growth. The Ideal Assessment The ideal assessment would be when the median and mean sales ratio by property type and residential umbrella for both the direct sales ratio analysis and the MCAP sales ratio analysis are at 95.0% All median sales ratios must be within the DOR specifications of 90.0% and 105.0 %. An assessment with a MCAP median ratio less than 90.0% or greater than 105.0% would NOT meet standards and would be subject to State Board changes. In addition to median ratios, additional review of other statistical measures including COD and PRD must also be considered. In Conclusion Our assessment model has always been to consider the sales in the study period, these may now be adjusted for market conditions. We also consider sales that have closed after the study period, current pending sales, and active listings to arrive at our current assessed values. The larger the range between the TCALC and the property type growth, the larger the range between the median MCAP sales ratio and the median direct sales ratio. This will result in some properties having direct ratios higher than their recent sales price. This is nothing new! At the parcel level when you are question on a value it is still all about sales, sales, and sales. What data do you have to support the value of the property for 2014, it is not about the change in value from the year before, it is not about what value the CAMA system reported, it is only about what that property would sell for on January 2, 2104 and what is your support! Good customer service would include verifying that our physical attributes on file are correct, perform a sales comparison grid with appropriate time adjustment, follow generally accepted appraisal principals, and continue to educate that with constantly changing markets, assessed values can be higher or lower than past sales. Market Conditions Adjustment for Sales Ratio Studies Page 2 -923- 4 With the MCAP Sales Ratios — What has changed? • State Board ratios will be based on current assessment • Assessments will be current with no lag in market trends • All sales have equal weight in median ratio calculations • Sales are no longer lost in unique submarkets • All sales ratios will be in alignment — State Board and Tax Court and 21 month Schools Aids • Consistent with IAAO standards • Consistent with appraisal principals • Higher quality assessments • More equalized assessments. Resources DOR Fact Sheets Property Tax Administrators Manual PACE Course Module 6 —Time Adjustments for Sales Ratios IAAO — Standard on Ratio Studies — April 2013 Minnesota Statutes Market Conditions Adjustment for Sales Ratio Studies Page 3 -924- 5 Mound Quintile Map M 2012 Summer 2011 2013 Summer 2012 2014 Summer 2013 2015 Summer 2014 2016 Summer 2015 -925- 6 • Module #8 • Assessment Reviews, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction • Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual Section: Assessment Appeal Process Open Book Meetings This version of appeal is an organized approach to address individual appeals in a less formal manner than the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. The assessor sets aside a time (generally during the months of April and May) and place to meet with citizens individually to discuss their specific concerns about their properties. These meetings are generally an alternative to the local board meeting but they can be held in addition to local boards. Taxpayers often find them less intimidating than presenting their appeal to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. They often appreciate the fact that they can have their questions answered in a more private setting and not have to be apprehensive about making a presentation in front of their friends and neighbors. In a one -on -one setting, property owners may spend more as much time with the appraiser as they need. They can compare the value of their home with the values of similar homes and review similar homes that have sold. The process is very efficient because concerns and questions are often resolved immediately. Property owners can see that the appraiser collects the same information on all properties, reassuring them that the process is the same for everyone, and they have not been singled out for a value increase. If the taxpayer and assessor continue to disagree after the open book meeting, the taxpayer may choose to proceed to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting (if one is held in addition to the open book meeting) or to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting (if there is no local board meeting). Ultimately, the taxpayer may choose to pursue an appeal to Tax Court. There are several different procedures for open book meetings. Some counties hold countywide open book meetings at one or more locations over a set time period, often during both daytime and evening hours. The dates, times, and locates of all meetings appear on the valuation notices. Taxpayers can attend any of the locations at any time and meet with an appraiser to discuss their valuations and/or classifications. Property records and value information is brought to any offsite meetings or accessed via laptop computers. Other counties hold open book meetings for specific jurisdictions. Taxpayers in these jurisdictions are notified of the date and time of the meeting on their valuation notices. These meetings may take place at a public facility in that jurisdiction or at the county offices. All of the property information is brought to the meeting or accessed via laptop computers if the meeting is held offsite. If a county allows for countywide open book meetings but still has some jurisdictions with traditional Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meetings, the taxpayers in those jurisdictions may attend the open book meetings, but it is not required. The taxpayer may choose to appeal directly to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. Of the taxpayer does attend the open book meeting and the taxpayer and assessor continue to disagree, the taxpayer can appeal to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. If the taxpayer and assessor continue to disagree on the market value or classification after meeting at the open book meeting, the taxpayer is free to attend the County Board of Appeal and Equalization (unless there is a local board, in which case, the taxpayer must appeal there first). Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction a Assessment Appeal Process Page last Revision; September2013 7 -926 - 7 Module #8 ■ Assessment Review, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual ■ Section: The Assessment Appeal Process Assessor's Role at the Open Book Meetine The assessor must handle each and every appeal presented at the open book meeting. County assessor offices may choose to show each taxpayer a short presentation about the assessment and property tax process, how the assessor arrives at the estimated market value and how values have changed in the jurisdiction over the past year. The office should have documentation procedures in place so taxpayer appeals can be recorded and addressed. In cases where changes are made, the assessor will need to document these changes and their rationale, and make sure the changes are reflected for that assessment. The office should also have procedures in place for notifying taxpayers of any changes that result from the open book meeting. This notification is important because any changes to the assessment made during the open book process may be further appealed by the taxpayer to the local or county boards, or to Tax Court. If a taxpayer comes to the open book meeting to discuss issues and the property has not been recently inspected by someone in the assessor's office, an appointment to view the property, both interior and exterior, should be scheduled. The ultimate role for the assessor at the open book meeting is to be sure all questions are addressed and that clear information is shared with property owners. The open book meeting can be an avenue to improve public relations. Page Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction . Assessment Appeal Process 8 Last Revision: September 2013 -927- 8 • Module #8 • Assessment Review, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction • Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual Section: Assessment Appeal Process Local Board of Appeal and Equalization The purpose of the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization (LBAE) is to provide a fair and objective forum for property owners to appeal their valuations and/or classifications. The local board often serves as the first formal step to the appeals process. Effective actions taken by the local board may potentially make a direct contribution to attaining assessment equality. The local board must address property owners' issues efficiently, fairly, and objectively and can only make changes that are substantiated by facts and that meet statutory guidelines. Any changes must be justified because they have the effect of shifting the tax burden to other properties in the jurisdiction. Assessors should not make changes to property within the 10 -day "window" between notices of valuation and classification being sent and the date of Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. If an assessor feels that a change to valuation or classification needs to be made between the time that notices are sent out and the board convenes, the assessor must notify the property owner at least ten days before bringing the issue before the board, thereby to give the property owner a chance to appear before the board as well. Ordinarily, the LBAE is made up of the city council or township board; it can also be a specially appointed board if a city charter provides for one. Some jurisdictions choose to hold open book meetings in lieu of LBAE meetings and still others choose to transfer their local board duties to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. The county assessor sets a day and time for each LBAE meeting providing each jurisdiction must be notified in writing on or before February 15 of each year. The clerk is responsible for giving published and posted notice of the meeting at least 10 days before the meeting. The publishing typically occurs in the local newspaper of the jurisdiction, and posting typically occurs in the city or town hall. An example of such notice is included at the end of this section. Meetings shall be held between April 1 and May 31 of each year. These meetings are public and must adhere to open meeting laws. The LBAE meets at the office of the clerk to review the valuations and classifications of properties within the jurisdiction. The assessor must be present to answer any questions and present evidence supporting their values and/or classifications. The county assessor, or delegate, must also attend. In order to appeal to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization, a property owner must first appeal to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization, if one is held. The meeting may recess from day to day until they finish hearing the cases presented, but must adjourn within 20 days. A longer period may be approved by the Commissioner of Revenue. The board must apply in writing for an extension; and the commissioner's approval is necessary to legalize any proceedings subsequent to the expiration of the 20 -day period. The commissioner will not extend the time for LBAEs to convene in June. No action may be taken by the board after May 31. All complaints heard after the initial 20 -day period (unless extended by the commissioner) or any complaints brought forth after May 31 must be appealed to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction . Assessment Appeal Process Page Last Revision: September 7013 9 Module #8 ■ Assessment Review, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual ■ Section: The Assessment Appeal Process Board members may not participate in any actions of the board which result in market value adjustments or classification changes to property owned by the board member, the board member's spouse, parent, stepparent, child, stepchild, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, or niece, or to any property in which the board member has a financial interest. Any relation may be by blood or by marriage. If such conflict arises, the remaining board may elect to hear the appeal, if a quorum and trained member remain. Otherwise, no change shall be made to the property, and the property owner shall be eligible to appear before the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. Taxpayers may appeal in person, in writing, or by representative. If a taxpayer fails to appeal in person, in writing, or by representative to appeal the valuation and /or classification of property, that person may not appeal to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. This does not apply if an assessment was made after the local board meeting or if the taxpayer can establish not having received the notice of market value at least five days before the meeting. Local Board Training Requirements Beginning with the 2006 LBAEs, Minnesota law required at least one member of each local board must have attended training provided by the Department of Revenue within the last four years. The legislation was enacted in response to complaints taxpayers made after attending local board meetings. For example, some taxpayers complained that local boards held meetings without having a quorum of members present, the felt that appealing to the local board was a confrontational experience, and in response to taxpayer appeals, and some local board members simply claimed that they "didn't know anything about property values." The training was required in an effort to reduce these complaints and improve this step of the appeal process for taxpayers. The training is offered numerous times statewide each year. Each region of the state is allowed to schedule up to five trainings as they see fit to meet the needs of their local boards. The statewide schedule is posted on the department's website so board members may attend a course that is most convenient. Attendees must pre - register for courses so that proper materials and facilities can be arranged. This also ensures the course is provided in the most effective manner. If attendees do not pre - register, they may be able to attend the course by registering on -site and paying an on -site registration fee, provided there is space available. There are also specially - scheduled "catch up" courses each year which follow local elections for board members who are newly - elected to office. The handbook and course, developed by the department, explain the role of the board in the assessment process, the legal and policy reasons for fair and impartial appeal and equalization hearings, board meeting procedures that foster fair and impartial assessment reviews and other best practices recommendations, quorum requirements for boards, and explanations of alternate methods of appeal. The course is instructed by property tax compliance officers from the department, and is usually about three hours in length. It includes a presentation and a review of the handbook that details the procedures and responsibilities of the board. This material is also available on the department's Page Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction - Assessment Appeal Process 10 Last Revision: September 2013 -929- 10 • Module #8 • Assessment Review, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction • Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual Section: Assessment Appeal Process website. In 2012, this training was combined with the required training for County Board of Appeal and Equalization members. If a local board intends to hold an LBAE meeting but fails to meet the training or quorum requirement, the assessor should take over the meeting as an open book meeting. Any taxpayer may appeal to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization if not satisfied with the outcome of the open book meeting. If a local board does not meet this training requirement or did not have a quorum for the year, their powers are also transferred to the county board for the following assessment year. This transfer of authority for failure to meet these requirements must be identified on the following year's Notice of Valuation and Classification and some procedure for the initial review of assessments (such as an open book meeting) must be made available. In order of the local board to be reinstated, it must prove compliance with the requirements and present the county assessor with a resolution by December I of the year following the violation to be effective for the next assessment year. For example, if a local board does not have a trained member present for the 2014 LBAE meetings, the assessor will take over the 2014 meeting as an open book meeting. The jurisdiction will lose their LBAE for the 2014 and 2015 assessments. In order to get it back for the 2016 assessment, the jurisdiction must have someone trained and provide the assessor with a resolution by December 1, 2015. Primary Statutory Reference: 274.01;274.014 Recommendations for Board Members It is recommended that assessors prepare board members ahead of the LBAE meeting to allow them to become familiar with local market activity for the year. The assessor should also provide sales information in advance of the meeting. Other helpful information may includes sales ratio studies by type of property, valuation schedules for land types, valuation information for the district, statutory classification information and corresponding class rates, review of value changes by property type in the district. Local Board Powers and Duties Generally, a local board determines whether all taxable property in the city or town has been properly placed on the current assessment rolls and property valued and classified by the assessor. Specifically, LBAEs have the following duties: • Establish a quorum - a majority of the voting members must be in attendance at both the initial meeting and any reconvene meetings for any valid actions to be taken; • Reduce the value of a property if market evidence warrants a reduction. The board may not make an individual market value adjustment that would benefit the property owner if the property owner has refused access to the assessor to inspect the property (both interior and exterior); Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction - Assessment Appeal Process Page Last Revision: 5eptember1013 11 -930- „ Module #8 0 Assessment Review, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual ■ Section: The Assessment Appeal Process • Increase the value of a property if market evidence warrants an increase or if improvements are missing from the property record, provided that the taxpayer is notified of the board's intent to increase to the value so that they may be allowed an opportunity to appeal; • Correct the classification of a property. The board may not make a classification adjustment that would the property owner if the property owner has refused access to the assessor to inspect the property; • Add omitted properties to the assessment rolls; • Personal property assessments are also within the board's jurisdiction. Personal property includes manufactured homes, storage sheds, or similar improvements located in a manufactured home park, and structures on leased public land and railroad operating right - of -way; • Consider and act upon any complaints or objections by taxpayers. Complaints may be made via letter, in person, or by representative. No changes in valuation or classification which are intended to correct errors in judgment by the county assessor may be made by the county assessor after the board has adjourned. Any changes which are corrections that are merely clerical in nature or to extend homestead treatment may be made after the board adjourns but must be made via abatement. All changes must be made available for public review and must also be reported to the county board by no later than December 31 of that same assessment year. Abatements will be discussed in greater detail later in this module. There are also several restrictions and limitations placed on LBAEs. A local board: • Cannot consider any prior year assessments; • Cannot act on individual tax amounts; • Cannot order changes to entire classes of property (by a blanket percentage); • Cannot make individual reductions that would reduce the aggregate assessment of a jurisdiction to decrease by more than one percent. If the total reductions would lower the aggregate assessments made by the assessor by more than one percent, none of the adjustments made by the board are valid. (The assessor shall correct any clerical errors or double assessments discovered by the board without regard to the one percent limitation.); • Cannot increase a person's market value without duly notifying the person of the intent and allowing the taxpayer an opportunity to appeal; • Cannot exempt property; • Cannot make changes benefitting a property owner who refuses entry by the assessor; • Cannot continue a meeting beyond 20 days from the time it convenes without specific approval from the Commissioner of Revenue; • Individual board members cannot participate in changes to property owned by relatives or property in which the member has a financial interest; • Cannot grant inclusion into special programs such as Green Acres, Open Space, Disabled Veterans Homestead Market Value Exclusion, etc. Page Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction • Assessment Appeal Process 12 Last Revision: 5eptember2013 -931- 12 • Module #8 • Assessment Review, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction • Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual Section: Assessment Appeal Process Primary Statutory References: 274.01; 274.014; 274.03 Special Board of Appeal and Equalization The council or governing body of any city may appoint a special board of appeal and equalization to which it may delegate all of the powers and duties of a local board of appeal and equalization. The special board shall serve at the direction and discretion of the appointing body, subject to the rules and restrictions as any other LBAE. The appointing body shall determine the number of members, the compensation and expenses to be paid, and the term of office of each member. At least one member of the special board must be an appraiser, Realtor, or other person familiar with property valuation in the assessment district. At least one member must also have met the training requirements for LBAE members. Primary Statutory References: 274.01 Duties of the clerk The town or city clerk has the following duties relating to LBAEs: • work with the county assessor to establish meeting dates for the board • coordinate with the board to ensure a quorum and trained member will be present • publish and post notice of meetings at least ten days prior to the date of the meeting • have a sign -in sheet for all appellants • take minutes as part of town or city record • return all necessary records to the county assessor in a timely manner • An example ofpublished/posted notice for local boards of appeal and equalization is such: Important Notice Regarding Assessment and Classification of Property This may affect your [#YEAR #] property tax payments. Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeal and Equalization of the [City/ Township] shall meet on [date], [time], at [location]. The purpose of this meeting is to determine whether taxable property in the city has been properly valued and classified by the assessor, and also to determine whether corrections need to be made. If you believe the value or classification of your property is incorrect, please contact your assessor's office to discuss your concerns. If you are still not satisfied with the valuation or classification after conferring with your assessor, you may appear before the local board of appeal and equalization. The board shall review the valuation, classification, or both if necessary, and shall correct it as needed. Generally, an appearance before your local board of appeal and equalization is required by law before an appeal can be taken to your county board of appeal and equalization. Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction • Assessment Appeal Process Page Last Revision. September 2013 13 -932- 13 MINNESOTA- REVENUE My House is Worth What? Tax Fact Sheet 14 Why doesn't the assessor's value reflect the sale price of my property? 1. There is a lag between the time of the assessment and when the sale takes place. An appraisal is an estimate of property value based on historical data at a set point in time — January 2 of each year — and the market can change dramatically by the time the property is sold. For example, consider a property valued at $180,000 as of January 2, 2007. This assessment is based on home sales that occurred between October 2005 and September 2006. However, the property may sell for $230,000 in August 2007. Does this mean the estimated value is incorrect? Not necessarily. It could signal an upturn in the housing market between September 2006 and August 2007, raising the sale price of the home. Just as buyers in rapidly accelerating markets may pay significantly more than the assessor's last valuation, they may also pay less in declining markets. A property valued by the assessor at $200,000 for the 2007 assessment may sell for $175,000 in August 2007. This lag time often results in a dramatic difference between actual sale prices and the estimated market values for the current year. 2. Properties can change over time. While values can fluctuate on an annual basis due to sales of similar properties, Minnesota law requires that properties only be inspected once every five years, unless new construction or demolition takes place. Between those inspections, properties may be improved without the owner obtaining a building permit — or they may deteriorate if neglected. These changes can be difficult for assessors, who may only see the exterior of the home, to consider in their annual evaluations. 3. There is no "correct" price for real estate —but rather a range of prices. The ultimate sale price of a particular property depends on its unique characteristics as well as the complex Property Tax Division - Mail Station 3340 - St. Paul, MN 55146 -3340 Revised 4108 -933- 14 www.taxes.state.mn.us motivations and preferences of the seller and potential buyers. If that weren't the case, Realtors and sellers would never have to reduce listing prices, offers from multiple buyers would all be identical, and professional appraisals would all arrive at the same value. In reality, list prices often misjudge the market, offers are negotiable and can vary widely, and appraised values may be disputed. 4. No two parcels of property are identical. Estimating the precise value of a property that is based on dozens, if not hundreds, of characteristics is very difficult. Even nearly identical properties (e.g. adjacent townhomes or condominiums) often sell for different amounts. 5. Real estate markets are highly localized and always changing. Sale prices of different types of properties can vary widely. Currently, farmland and recreational properties are rising in value and sales are strong, but residential sales are stable or slightly declining in several areas. Some neighborhoods are declining at a much faster rate than other areas, which may be stable or slightly increasing in value. 6. Fewer sales mean more challenges for assessors. In many markets and for many types of property, there are few sales of comparable properties. This can make accurate market assessments more difficult, but the assessor must still use his/her professional judgment and knowledge to estimate market values on an annual basis. This may mean looking at sales that take place outside the study time frame or in a neighboring city or township. 7. Not all sales are representative of the market. Some sales, such as foreclosures, sales between relatives, or sales where the seller or buyer are acting under undue duress are not considered open - market, arm's - length transactions and are not used in sales ratio studies, nor are they used as comparables in estimating the market values of similar properties. If you have additional questions or concerns, please contact your county assessor. This fact sheet is intended to help you become more familiar with Minnesota tax laws and your rights and responsibilities under the laws. Nothing in this fact sheet supersedes, alters, or otherwise changes any provisions of the tax law, administrative rules, court decisions, or revenue notices. Alternative Cannata available upon request. Minnesota Revenue 1 MINNESOTA- REVENUE www.taxes.state.mn.us Tax Fact Sheet 12b Property Tax Assessment Process Minnesota has what is known as an ad valorem property tax. This means property tax is divided among taxable properties according to their value. The final amount of property tax the owner of a property pays in any given year is the end result of a process that begins over two years before property tax statements are actually mailed to property owners. The process begins with the assessor collecting data on sales of properties within the market during a specific time period between October of one year and September of the following year (this period is known as a sales study period). Over the next several months and by using mass appraisal techniques, assessors analyze the data in order to estimate each property's market value for the next assessment (January 2). Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 273.11 assessors must estimate the value of property at a value that would represent what the property would sell for in an open - market arms length transaction on January 2 of each year. The assessor cannot adopt a higher or lower standard of value because the value will be used for the purposes of taxation. Assessors also classify property according to its use on January 2. Between April and June, taxpayer have an opportunity to appeal both the estimated market value and the classification of their property. Values and classifications are generally finalized July 1 of each year. Local units of government then finalize their estimated budgets for the upcoming year. Once the budgets are finalized in December, the market values and classifications are used to divide the overall tax levy among all taxable properties. Tax statements are mailed by the following March 31. For example, sales of properties that occur between October 1, 2008 and September 30, 2009 are used by assessors to estimate a property's market value for the January 2, 2010 assessment. Following an appeal process that occurs between April 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the valuations and classifications generally become final on July 1, 2010. Mail Station 3340 St. Paul, MN 55146 -3340 Revised 07/09 This lengthy time frame may result in a significant difference between actual sales prices occurring in the current market and assessors' estimated market values for the current year's assessment. Using the final values and the local jurisdictions' proposed budgets, the auditor then estimates each property's proposed taxes payable for 2011. After public budget meetings are held and final budget numbers are adopted, property tax statements are mailed to taxpayers by March 31, 2011. In summary, sales taking place from October 2008 to September 2009 are used to estimate a property's market value as of January 2, 2010 which will in turn be used to calculate property taxes payable in 2011. What is the role of the assessor? Assessors use historical sales in order to estimate each property's market value as of the assessment date (January 2) of each year. The assessor also classifies the property according to its use on January 2 of each year. Assessors also review other quantifiable data such as supply /demand, marketing times, sales concessions, vacancy rates, etc. to help in analyzing whether a market is increasing, stable, or decreasing. During increasing markets, this may benefit some property owners because a buyer may pay a price that is significantly higher than the assessor placed on the property for the last assessment. For example, if a property is valued by the assessor at $180,000 for the 2009 assessment (based on sales that occurred between October 2007 and September 2008), and it sells for $230,000 in August 2009, the new property owner is benefiting from the lower market value for the 2009 assessment which will be used to calculate taxes payable in 2010. The August 2009 sale of the property will be included in the study period of October 2008 to September 2009 which the This fact sheet is intended to help you become more familiar with Minnesota tax laws and your rights and responsibilities under the laws. Nothing in this fact sheet supersedes, alters, or otherwise changes any provisions of the tax law, administrative rules, court decisions, or other revenue notices. Alternative formats available upon request. Minnesota Revenue, How the Assessor Estimates Your Market Value t -934- 15 assessor will use to value property for the 2010 assessment for taxes payable in 2011. This same lag time is also present in declining markets. For example, if the assessor places a market value of $200,000 on a property for the 2009 assessment (again using sales that occurred between October 2007 and September 2008), but the property sells for $175,000 in August 2009, does it mean the January 2, 2009 assessed value is incorrect? Not necessarily. It could signal a downturn in the housing market just began to occur between September 2008 and August 2009. The assessor will use the August 2009 sale as well as other occurring in the market to estimate 2010 market values. The assessor does not raise property tax revenues by increasing values. Total property tax revenues are a function of county, school district, and city/town spending as well as state -paid local government aid and other factors. The value and classification of the property are merely a way to divide the total property tax levy among all taxpayers. The total amount of the levy will be collected whether values increase or decrease from one year to the next. An individual's share of the overall tax burden may change from year to year, however. What are sales ratio studies? Sales ratios show the relationship between the assessor's estimated market value on a property and the actual sale price of a property. Each year the assessor performs sales ratio studies on properties that have sold in their jurisdiction. These sales are stratified many different ways including by location and property type (residential, agricultural, commercial, etc.). The sales can also be stratified further such as by home style, subdivision, age of structure, location on or off water frontage, price range, etc. A single sale may not represent the true market activity. Rather, sales of all properties are reviewed to determine market trends. However, even if there are no sales occurring within the sales ratio study period, assessors are still expected to use their professional judgment and knowledge of the local market to annually value properties in their jurisdiction. Whenever any real estate is sold for a consideration in excess of $1,000, a Certificate of Real Estate Value (CRV) is filed. These CRVs are the foundation of all sales ratio studies because they contain important information about each transaction. Assessors then verify the information contained on the CRY in order to determine whether or not the sale represents an open -market arm's length transaction. If the sale does not represent an open - market, arm's length transaction, it may not be used in the sales ratio study. -935- 16 Simply having an extremely high or low sales ratio is not a valid reason to remove a sale from the sales ratio study. Rather, the extreme ratio indicates a need for additional investigation by the assessor. Again, sales ratio study periods are generally October I of a given year to September 30 of the following year. For example, for the 2010 assessment, assessors use sales that took place between October 1, 2008 and September 30, 2009. This is the reason that assessors' market values may lag a bit behind current market activity. Assessors will use the median sales ratio as the statistical measure of the overall level of assessment. The median ratio is the middle ratio of all the ratios when they are arranged in order from highest to lowest (or vice versa). The median is used because it is not affected by extreme ratios. Department of Revenue guidelines indicate that the median ratio of a sales ratio study should be between 90 and 105 percent. Is it possible for the values of some properties to decrease while others increase? Yes. Each segment of the market is different. Sales prices of certain types of properties can vary widely. Currently, sales of both farmland and recreational properties are strong and show appreciation. However, the sales of residential properties are stable or declining in some areas. Sometimes it can be difficult to estimate the rate at which a market is increasing or declining. Ideally, a property would sell twice within a certain period of time, such as one year, but all other characteristics of the property would remain the same. That way an appraiser or assessor would be able to isolate a time adjustment to indicate whether the market is increasing or decreasing or simply remaining stable. Do all areas increase or decline at the same rate? No. Some areas or neighborhoods are declining at a much faster rate than others that are showing stable values or values that are slightly increasing. Conclusion In conclusion, it is essential that taxpayers understand that there may be a legitimate reason for the assessor's annual market value to be different from current market conditions due to the lag time between sales study periods and sales taking place today. For additional information, please refer to Fact Sheet 12a Understanding Property Taxes and Fact Sheet 12c Understanding Your Assessment and the Appeals Process. Minnesota Revenue, How the Assessor Estimates Your Market Value 2 2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Rousing Market Median Prices ® Around the Metro Id INkEA GOLIS AREA Association REALTORS' Change Change 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 From 2009 Twin Cities Region $165,000 $1691900 $150,000 $167,900 $192,000 +14.4% + 16.4% Afton $307,000 $330,000 $430,000 $275,000 $409,500 +48.9% +33.4% Albertville $167,190 $150,200 $142,500 $149,950 $178,900 +19.3% +7.0% Andover $205,000 $205,000 $182,000 $205,000 $227,500 +11.0% +11.0% Annandale $154,700 $154,110 $153,889 $170,000 $159,000 -6.5% +2.8% Anoka $130,000 $136,312 $113,500 $122,900 $146,950 +19.6% +13.0% Apple Valley $170,500 $177,150 $149,950 $175,000 $195,000 +11.4% +14.4% Arden Hills $232,250 $241,025 $157,500 $325,000 $300,300 -7.6% +29.3% Bayport $186,000 $157,500 $147,000 $184,500 $200,000 +8.4% +7.5% Becker $134,500 $131,950 $131,700 $149,375 $155,900 +4.4% +15.9% Belle Plains $149,900 $142,250 $137,300 $145,000 $159,000 +9.7% +6.1% Bethel $140,000 $147,600 $100,000 $115,950 $135,000 +16.4% -3.6% Big Lake $135,900 $140,000 $117,500 $134,900 $154,500 +14.5% +13.7% Birchwood Village $299,000 $0 $240,500 $227,900 $287,375 +26.1% -3.9% Blaine $169,900 $170,500 $154,900 $175,000 $199,500 +14.0% +17.4% Bloomington $181,200 $178,322 $157,000 $171,000 $193,050 +12.900 %a +6.5° %a Bloomington - East $157,250 $157,000 $140,000 $145,300 $169,350 +16.6% +7.7% Bloomington - West $210,000 $206,950 $181,725 $191,000 $215,000 +12.6% +2.4% Brainerd MSA $142,250 $151,000 $145,000 $154,000 $160,000 +3.9% +12.5% Brooklyn Center $90,000 $110,000 $82,300 $95,000 $122,000 +28.4% +35.6% Brooklyn Park $134,020 $140,000 $127,000 $146,000 $167,000 +14.4% +24.6% Buffalo $145,500 $150,000 $131,500 $141,000 $171,810 +21.9% +18.1% Burnsville $175,000 $167,000 $147,750 $165,300 $185,000 +11.9% +5.7% Cambridge $110,125 $105,000 $94,000 $101,300 $127,000 +25.400 %o +15.3% Cannon Falls $146,500 $139,450 $121,450 $145,000 $177,500 +22.4% +21.2% Carver $237,950 $225,900 $225,000 $245,000 $282,500 +15.3% +18.7% Centerville $222,000 $180,000 $154,600 $180,000 $189,950 +5.5% -14.4% Champlin $162,000 $172,078 $148,000 $159,400 $182,700 +14.6% +12.8% Chanhassen $267,500 $313,500 $297,500 $280,500 $303,500 +8.2% +5.6° %o Chaska $177,500 $210,750 $170,000 $207,500 $252,000 +21.4% +42.0% Chisago $175,000 $159,500 $155,700 $168,500 $199,850 +18.6% +14.2% Circle Pines $148,750 $139,900 $124,150 $139,450 $144,300 +3.5% -3.0% Clear Lake $113,000 $168,950 $146,800 $152,450 $162,700 +6.7% +44.0% Clearwater $122,000 $159,900 $127,750 $150,000 $160,000 +6.7° %0 +31.1% Coates $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -- -- Cokato $120,000 $99,000 $107,500 $105,000 $129,900 +23.7% +8.3% Cologne $205,013 $193,000 $189,900 $182,550 $181,500 -0.6% -11.5% Columbia Heights $122,500 $120,000 $101,500 $99,950 $132,000 +32.1% +7.8° %a Columbus $222,000 $232,000 $177,277 $208,500 $202,800 -2.7% -8.6% Coon Rapids $136,500 $133,000 $114,900 $125,105 $150,000 +19.9% +9.9% Corcoran $315,000 $291,500 $246,000 $230,000 $300,000 +30.4% -4.8% Cottage Grove $180,000 $174,450 $160,000 $174,650 $194,000 +11.1% +7.8% Crystal $139,950 $139,900 $105,000 $127,550 $149,500 +17.2% +6.8% Dayton $197,000 $205,000 $142,000 $191,500 $274,000 +43.1% +39.1% ..... CurreyI ns o(..e tuvy 102014. Spu�6red bpRyal Credit Ul1irl (V4 V. RCU.org]. l,Ifdd, Irmn North =3a1 SPOmered t. ICKR earch,,d Markwr, 117 936- 17 2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market Median Prices - Around the Metro W MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association ctREAI.1 -0RS' -937- 18 Change Change 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Fmm 2012 From 2009 Deephaven $545,000 $509,000 $322,000 $493,250 $5181500 +6.1% -4.9% Delano $201,500 $195,000 $173,150 $205,500 $230,000 +11.9% +14.1% Dellwood $462,500 $617,575 $499,000 $360,000 $507,500 +41.0% +9.7% Eagan $182,150 $189,000 $170,950 $193,990 $220,000 +13.4% +20.8% East Bethel $158,950 $150,400 $162,500 $165,000 $179,900 +9.0% +13.2% Eden Prairie $250,000 $264,800 $257,110 $257,000 $280,000 +8.9% +120% Edina $324,900 $339,000 $339,000 $343,875 $350,000 +1.8% +7.7% Elk River $158,000 $160,000 $132,000 $157,000 $171,500 +9.2% +8.5% Elko New Market $2301000 $209,900 $193,000 $215,000 $247,627 +15.2% +7.7% Excelsior $332,450 $277,000 $350,000 $291,500 $409,750 +40.6% +23.3% Falcon Heights $267,500 $239,500 $207500 $228,706 $244,000 +6.7% -8.8% Faribault $115,500 $118,500 $100,000 $115,000 $128,450 +11.7% +11.2% Farmington $175,600 $172,000 $140,500 $163,000 $192,250 +17.9% +9.5% Forest Lake $142,000 $135,450 $153,750 $185,000 $191,000 +3.2% +34.5% Fridley $138,900 $136,545 $120,000 $127,000 $153,500 +20.994, +10.5% Gem Lake $302,500 $225,450 $240,000 $352,261 $169,450 -51.9% -44.0% Golden Valley $220,000 $235,500 $199,000 $218,500 $246,000 +12.6% +11.8% Grant $432,500 $395,000 $422,500 $367,500 $415,500 +13.1% -3.9% Greenfield $153,250 $237,750 $373,000 $350,000 $354,000 +1.1% +131.0% Greenwood $796,750 $659,900 $755,000 $675,000 $921,500 +36.5% +15.7% Ham Lake $235,500 $227,500 $211,500 $230,000 $271,600 + 18A% +15.3% Hamburg $124,900 $102,450 $75,200 $111,500 $95,500 - 14.3% -23.6% Hammond $127,500 $116,500 $115,750 $121,450 $144,000 +18.6% +12.9% Hampton $173,875 $189,950 $172,000 $138,500 $217,250 +56.9% +24.9% Hanover $229,900 $208,875 $214,950 $211,000 $239,950 +13.7% +4.4% Hastings $150,000 $148,500 $128,500 $142,000 $169,900 +19.6% +13.3% Hilltop $120,000 $35,000 $0 $24,500 $34,500 +40.800 %a -71.3% Hopkins $160,000 $148,000 $125,000 $159,950 $180,500 +12.8% +12.8% Hudson $195,000 $194,848 $184,500 $195,000 $228,500 +172% +17.2% Hugo $154,900 $158,338 $137,000 $164,199 $195,000 +18.8% +25.9% Hutchinson $124,950 $127,950 $115,000 $111,500 $125,000 +12.1% +0.0% Independence $306,500 $433,500 $247,950 $387,250 $405,000 +4.6% +32.1% Inver Grove Heights $165,751 $165,500 $155,000 $160,000 $194,950 +21.8% +17.6% Isanti $120,950 $114,114 $91,500 $117,000 $125,000 +6.8% +3.3% Jordan $204,000 $174,150 $178,000 $177,000 $214,500 +21.2% +5.1% Lake Elmo $405,250 $369,500 $374,800 $367,500 $374,900 +2.0% -7.5% Lake Minnetonka Area $337,900 $341,250 $329,860 $339,000 $370,000 +9.1% +9.5% Lake St. Croix Beach $158,000 $154,850 $85,250 $180,000 $139,000 -22.8% - 12.0% Lakeland $169,000 $211,000 $221,000 $195,500 $204,990 +4.9% +21.3% Lakeland Shores $270,000 $738,100 $178,139 $270,000 $265,000 -1.9% -1.9% Lakeville $224,188 $225,000 $205,000 $226,000 $258,000 +14.2% +15.1% Lauderdale $189,950 $173,900 $128,150 $168,000 $175,000 +42% -7.9% Lexington $138,250 $130,000 $108,563 $136,950 $149,900 +9.5% +8.4° %a Lilydale $180000 $201,500 $177,500 $190,000 $200,250 +5.4% +11.3% Cwmn! s, of Jenaa�-10, 20t4 . Sponsored by Rye[ Cr,dlt Unlan ( wu ROU ol," r.11 dA, from Norh,141: S. lo,svi d b, IOK Rs,co ch and l IS -937- 18 2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market Median Prices ® Around the Metro MINNWOLIS AREA Hssocnimn �fREALTORS' Change Change 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 from 2009 Lindstrom $180,000 $150,000 $143,900 $140,000 $160,025 +14.3% -11.1% Lino Lakes $218,950 $211,250 $174,200 $208,375 $229,900 +10.3% +5.0% Little Canada $175,250 $106,500 $140,000 $175,000 $184,250 +5.3% +5.1% Long Lake $197,450 $198,500 $186,500 $227,500 $231,500 +1.8% +1Z2% Lonsdale $160,750 $150,000 $135,000 $144,900 $171,000 +18.0% +6.4% Loretto $190,800 $215,572 $217,875 $130,000 $199,900 +53.8% +4.8% Mahtomedi $199,000 $249,995 $257,500 $249,900 $245,000 -2.0% +23.1% Maple Grove $222,000 $258,000 $214,000 $219,453 $232,750 +6.1% +4.8% Maple Lake $100,000 $100,000 $112,840 $134,950 $145,000 +7.4% +45.0% Maple Plain $161,250 $166,700 $153,500 $187,450 $178,750 -4.6% +10.9% Maplewood $162,000 $156,000 $139,400 $145,000 $165,000 +13.8% +1.9% Marine on St. Croix $283,500 $272,500 $242,000 $274,450 $320,000 +16.6% +12.9% Mayer $169,900 $174,950 $169,900 $164,405 $189,900 +15.5% +11.8% Medicine Lake $0 $600,000 $315,000 $650,000 $542,000 -16.6% -- Medina $580,000 $615,000 $525,000 $460,000 $527,500 +14.7°%a -9.1% Mendota $0 $493,500 $80,000 $154,500 $287,000 +85.8% -- Mendota Heights $289,450 $305,000 $286,500 $272,000 $282,500 +3.9% -2.4% Miesville $0 $165,350 $0 $140,000 $231,671 +65.5% - - Minneapolis - (Citywide) $145,000 $160,000 $140,000 $165,000 $189,075 +14.6% +30.4% Minneapolis - Calhoun -Isle $272,750 $315,000 $267,021 $300,000 $327,780 +9.3% +20.2% Minneapolis - Camden $49,000 $66,002 $45,000 $59,500 $77,000 +29.4% +57.1% Minneapolis - Central $237,500 $225,000 $214,250 $220,000 $247,500 +12.5% +4.2% Minneapolis - Longfellow $172,000 $170,500 $147,500 $169,000 $185,200 +9.6% +7.7% Minneapolis - Near North $36,950 $55,000 $43,000 $60,000 $81,000 +35.0% +119.2% Minneapolis - Nokomis $189,892 $195,200 $162,700 $176,500 $199,900 +13.3% +5.3% Minneapolis - Northeast $150,000 $151,500 $125,000 $140,000 $169,900 +21.4% +13.3% Minneapolis - Phillips $78,000 $110,000 $72,500 $88,000 $90,225 +2.5% +15.7% Minneapolis - Powderhorn $123,950 $135,000 $110,000 $116,400 $157,500 +35.3% +27.1% Minneapolis - Southwest $260,000 $276,000 $264,450 $277,000 $306,000 +10.5% + 17.7 % Minneapolis - University $215,000 $207,950 $205,250 $209,950 $221,500 +5.5% +3.0% Minnetonka $245,000 $265,713 $233,000 $255,000 $278,950 +9.4% +13.9% Minnetonka Beach $2,700,000 $825,000 $1,130,000 $675,000 $892,500 +32.2% -66.9% Minnetrista $346,639 $325,086 $349,950 $385,000 $435,000 +13.0% +25.5% Monticello $133,000 $135,000 $124,000 $137,095 $155,990 +13.8% +17.3% Montrose $133,943 $131,371 $114,950 $130,357 $149,000 +14.3% +11.2% More $87,700 $79,900 $84,400 $86,500 $98,000 +13.3% +11.7% Mound $181,000 $188,000 $150,000 $169,000 $192,750 +14.1% +6.5% Mounds View $153,000 $166,700 $134,950 $139,500 $163,000 +16.8% +6.5% New Brighton $187,000 $178,000 $157,500 $165,000 $171,000 +3.6% -8.6% New Germany $109,000 $105,000 $110,000 $100,000 $142,450 +42.5% +30.7% New Hope $158,250 $148,000 $126,125 $155,000 $173,000 +11.6% +9.3% New Prague $170,000 $161,250 $143,000 $174,000 $195,000 +12.1% +14.7% New Richmond $139,950 $135,400 $110,000 $124,900 $137,850 +10.4% -1.5% New Trier $0 $149,900 $0 $75,000 $63,700 -15.1% -- ...... Correo�asoNrrwry 10, 2014. Sp reo!etl byR ICretle Union( aRCUnr9).,r��;tlatzfrom NotlM1St4F £Saovieretlby iCKR eamb zntl Marketing. 19 -938- 19 2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market Median Prices ® Around the Metro 4VINNEAPOUS AREA Association orREAILTORS' Curter es f'enuary 1e. 2014_ Sponsored byk cJ OreCI Unrn(, `,Ri U.org ) e.edeta f.0rrrNOIhsWNIL5. POwcred by I0K Researchand 1,, ,,r, 120 -939- 20 Change Change 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 From 2009 Newport $127,400 $123,500 $72,175 $98,500 $141,000 +43.1% +10.7% North Branch $144,350 $136,000 $115,000 $123,650 $150,000 +21.3% +3.9% North Oaks $475,000 $584,000 $480,000 $510,000 $625,000 +22.5 %% +31.6% North Saint Paul $160,000 $145,000 $120,D00 $139,950 $151,000 +7.9% -5.6% Northfield $165,000 $159,900 $144,550 $157,250 $182,500 +16.1% +10.6% Norwood Young America $134,500 $155,450 $119,900 $128,912 $146,000 +13.3% +8.6% Nowthen $230,090 $216,000 $180,000 $209,500 $234,500 +11.9% +2.0% Oak Grove $207,000 $200,450 $175,000 $200,825 $229,000 + 14.0% +10+6% Oak Park Heights $127,000 $136,100 $130,000 $134,799 $176,200 +30.7% +38.7% Oakdale $159,900 $164,600 $133,000 $134,950 $164,000 +21.5% +2.6% Orono $595,000 $565,000 $532,500 $377,223 $501,000 +32.89A -15.8% Osseo $146,250 $136,000 $115,000 $153,950 $141,950 -7.8% -2.9% Otsego $159,900 $160,610 $159,900 $163,450 $194,150 +18.8% +21.4% Pine City $122,500 $100,000 $81,500 $105,260 $111,275 +5.7% -9.2% Pine Springs $485,000 $390,000 $300,000 $271,500 $320,000 +17.9% -34.0% Plymouth $253,500 $249,000 $245,000 $275,500 $301,500 +9.4% +18.9% Princeton $103,160 $113,900 $111,000 $105,000 $140,000 +33.3% +35.7% Prior Lake $234,500 $223,900 $211,000 $227,500 $270,10D + 18.7% + 15.20% Ramsey $152,250 $156,830 $137,000 $153,000 $182,900 +19.5% +20.1% Randolph $169,400 $198,900 $168,937 $139,950 $195,900 +40.0% +15.6% Red Wing $139,900 $125,000 $119,850 $127,500 $126,900 -0.5% -9.3% Richfield $165,000 $160,000 $140,250 $155,000 $174,900 +12.8% +6.0% River Falls $165,000 $172,500 $143,600 $151,000 $168,500 +11.6% +2.1% Robbinsdale $145,000 $131,500 $104,750 $123,500 $140,000 +13.4% -3.4% Rockford $192,500 $169,800 $130,000 $154,000 $197,400 +28.2% +2.5% Rogers $226,825 $212,000 $210,000 $236,000 $265,000 +12.3% +16.8% Rosemount $193,500 $201,500 $170,0DO $180,000 $215,000 +19.4% +11.1% Roseville $198,000 $190,000 $158,500 $187,450 $197,535 +5.4% -0.2% Rush City $87,000 $95,000 $113,000 $92,000 $122,750 +33.4% +41.1% Saint Anthony $210,000 $181,000 $178,200 $154,950 $179,950 +16.1% -14.3% Saint Bonifacius $170,000 $178,850 $145,000 $189,500 $185,500 -2.1% +9.1% Saint Cloud MSA $135,200 $135,000 $127,000 $135,000 $144,500 +7.0% +6.9% Saint Francis $133,000 $135,000 $122,100 $130,000 $149,450 +15.0% +12.4% Saint Louis Park $212,500 $213,250 $185,000 $198,450 $219,000 +10.4% +3.1 % Saint Mary's Point $235,000 $134,500 $1,100,000 $170,500 $258,800 +51.8% +10.10% Saint Michael $179,950 $165,000 $165,000 $183,363 $199,450 +8.8% +10.8% Saint Paul $117,500 $121,250 $100,000 $120,000 $144,000 +20.0% +22.6% Saint Paul - Battle Creek /Highwood $116,000 $121,500 $89,700 $111,950 $135,050 +20.6% +16.4% Saint Paul - Como Park $199,900 $190,400 $145,000 $170,ODO $190,000 +11.8% -5.0% Saint Paul - Dayton's Bluff $60,000 $74,950 $50,000 $59,450 $92,900 +56.3% +54.8% Saint Paul - Downtown $140,000 $152,500 $128,250 $136,500 $157,975 + 15.7% +12.8% Saint Paul- Greater East Side $103,000 $102,000 $85,000 $88,900 $115,750 +30.2 %% +12.4% Saint Paul - Hamline- Midway $149,450 $142,000 $104,500 $126,350 $149,125 +18.0% -0.2% Saint Paul - Highland Park $225,000 $232,250 $235,000 $229,900 $249,500 +8.5% +10.9% Curter es f'enuary 1e. 2014_ Sponsored byk cJ OreCI Unrn(, `,Ri U.org ) e.edeta f.0rrrNOIhsWNIL5. POwcred by I0K Researchand 1,, ,,r, 120 -939- 20 2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market Median Prices 6 Around the Metro MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association of REALIORS' Change Change 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 From 2012 From 2009 Saint Paul - Lexington- Hamline $214,900 $217,000 $210,000 $240,000 $229,900 - 4.2% +7.0% Saint Paul - Macalester- Groveland $240,000 $250,000 $228,750 $235,000 $264,250 + 12.4% +10.1% Saint Paul - North End / South Como $75,000 $76,250 $57,313 $74,050 $99,900 + 34.9% +33,2% Saint Paul - Payne - Phalen $70,000 $82,000 $65,000 $80,500 $101,000 +25.5% +44.3% Saint Paul - St. Anthony Park $258,000 $216,750 $180,000 $190,000 $259,500 +36.6% +0.6% Saint Paul - Summit Hill $315,000 $377,500 $325,000 $288,000 $341,450 +18.6% +8.4% Saint Paul - Summit - University $125,000 $157,325 $130,000 $148,750 $170,000 +14.3% +36.0% Saint Paul - Thomas -Dale $49,500 $65,450 $45,000 $55,000 $80,950 +47.2% +63.5% Saint Paul - West Seventh $148,450 $142,900 $103,626 $121,000 $145,D00 +19.8% -2.3% Saint Paul - West Side $91,000 $113,000 $82,000 $90,000 $122,000 +35.6% +34.1% Saint Paul Park $129,900 $134,600 $117,000 $127,750 $145,200 +13.7% +11.8% Savage $210,000 $200,000 $186,500 $208,000 $235,000 +13.0% +11.9% Scandia $255,000 $235,000 $240,000 $247,870 $290,000 +17.0% +13.7% Shakopee $175,000 $180,000 $154,900 $167,000 $193,000 +15.6% +10.3% Shoreview $204,950 $205,000 $180,000 $191,000 $222,500 +16.5% +8.6% Shorewood $356,200 $359,288 $349,950 $414,900 $425,000 +2.4% +19.3% Somerset $136,400 $130,950 $127,000 $119,900 $144,500 +20.5% +5.9% South Haven $160,000 $215,500 $187,500 $153,500 $184,950 +20.5% +15.6% South Saint Paul $130,250 $131,500 $114,995 $112,000 $139,900 +24.9% +7.4% Spring Lake Park $136,500 $131,000 $92,250 $118,D00 $141,000 +19.5% +3.3% Spring Park $270,000 $266,500 $199,900 $352,500 $272,500 - 22.7% +0.9% Stacy $153,450 $138,500 $139,000 $108,750 $181,750 +67.1% +18.4% Stillwater $208,500 $230,000 $208,000 $216,000 $234,000 +8.3% +12.2% Sunfish Lake $830,000 $300,000 $550,320 $685,000 $819,000 +19.6% -1.3% Tonka Bay $525,OD0 $495,000 $550,000 $797,500 $477,500 - 401% -9.0% Vadnais Heights $153,500 $165,000 $165,000 $149,900 $167,250 +11.6% +9.0% Vermillion $169,900 $145,013 $153,500 $187,500 $157,500 -16,0% -7.3% Victoria $330,375 $374,695 $351,250 $344,123 $371,500 +8.0% +12.4% Waconia $199,700 $213,500 $187,500 $204,250 $228,500 +11.9% +14A% Watertown $175,263 $159,500 $118,000 $153,000 $175,000 +14.4% -0.2% Wayzata $500,000 $439,000 $426,000 $427,500 $348,000 -18.6% -30.4% West Saint Paul $126,500 $136,500 $120,000 $125,700 $142,750 +13.6% +12.8% White Bear Lake $167,000 $175,000 $148,500 $161,950 $178,50D +10.2% +6.9% Willemie $70,000 $117,699 $77,000 $141,500 $128,900 -8.9% +84.1% Woodbury $239,000 $243,750 $219,700 $240,000 $267,000 +113% +11.7% Woodland $847,500 $561,000 $1,065,000 $700,000 $370,000 -47.1% - 56.3 %% Wyoming $165,000 $156,700 $150,000 $163,750 $190,000 +16.0% +15.2% Zimmerman $135,000 $143,700 $118,000 $130,000 $151,250 +16.3% +12.0% Zumbrota $154,000 $129,700 $132,950 $149,900 $155,000 +3.4% +0.6% -.- Current as ; f January 10, £014. Sponsored be RogW Credit Union (aww.RCU g), Ali data from NorlhsterM:S ao+ered by 10K turreirch trial Marketing. i 21 -940- 21 Executive Summary TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: May 8, 2014 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 14 -01 Concept/Sketch Plan — Major Subdivision REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant, Kent Fredrichsen, is proposing a 3 lot major subdivision in the vicinity of Meadow Lane, Fairfield Road, and Leach Lane (unimproved). The applicant has requested City Council review of the concept/sketch plan to identify any potential issues prior to the development of the formal application. Review by the City Council of a concept/sketch plan for a major subdivision is provided for in the subdivision regulations. The proposed major subdivision will be an infill project made possible through the applicant's assembly of former tax forfeited properties near his home, as well as the vacation of certain portions of unimproved Hullett Avenue through City Council approval last fall. The project is a major subdivision as it involves the extension of Fairfield Road to the west, the construction of Leach Lane with a cul -de -sac, and the extension of public utilities to serve the three lots. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their May 6, 2014 meeting. A neighbor attended the meeting and expressed concern about the subdivision. The extension of Fairfield Road will occur in front of his house while Leach Lane will be extended to the west of his home. He also expressed concern about the potential impacts on the wetlands in the area. The Planning Commission expressed minimal concerns about the proposed subdivision. It was requested that the setback areas be shown when the formal application is made. The draft minutes from the meeting have been provided for review. 1231 941 'hird Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612)338-0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 6, 2014 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist & Pete Wiechert. Staff present: Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secr'etaryJill Norlander. Others present: Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd); Art & Barb King (2964 Pelican Point Cir); Loren Pellet (5660 Sunnybrook Cir); Matt Van Nelson (2925 Meadow La); Grant Johnson (6347 Bay Ridge Rd) BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 14 -01 Sketch Plan for Major Subdivision Meadow Lane /Fairfield Road/ Leach Lane - Applicant: Kent Friedrichsen Trapp introduced the sketch plan. Proposed is a three lot subdivision that meets the comprehensive plan designation and is zoned R2 residential. The major subdivision process is required because of construction of streets and utilities to serve the proposed lots. There are no flood plain issues. Wetlands are located northwest of the parcel. The parcel currently has no improved streets for access; however, a 24 foot wide street constructed with a cul -de -sac and the extension of Fairfield Road with a turnaround as required by fire code is contemplated. There are some engineering design issues'`(stormwater and water main) to be addressed with the Public Works Department. Zoning standards for R2 are being met with the exception of the lot depth for Lot 3. Staff is generally supportive of the variance as it is needed due to a desire not to extend Fairfield Road farther west in front of the lot. This results in the lot not having enough frontage on Fairfield Road to meet minimum requirements for lot frontage on an improved public street and the designation of the front of the lot needing to be Leach Lane. Due to the 24 foot street width there will be no parking on either side of the street. Placement of houses on the survey has been shown to demonstrate that houses can be built on the proposed lots. Some private utilities may need to be moved and are being addressed. Retterath asked if the staff is comfortable with the 24 foot street width. Trapp said public works and engineering said it was doable. He questioned the Fairfield turnaround vs. a full size cul -de -sac. Trapp said that the turnaround fulfilled the fire requirements but would be "no parking ". City Engineer said that, at this point, storm water is ok and will be handled in detail. Retterath requested setback lines be shown in future sketches. -942- Smieja asked if parking would be allowed in the cul -de -sac. Trapp said no. Retterath questioned how the hardcover percentage was established. Trapp noted that hardcover percentages are not linked to zoning but rather to whether a lot is a lot of record or a new lot. Discussion Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd) asked if there is a time when someone has a chance to oppose the plan. Penner indicated there would be a public hearing and neighbors would be notified. -943- r MIN CITY 4F CAOUND _.. min PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 30, 2014 SUBJECT: Concept /sketch plan —major subdivision APPLICANT: Kent Friedrichsen PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 14 -01 ZONING: R- 2 Single and Two Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential SUMMARY The applicant, Kent Fredrichsen, is proposing a 3 lot subdivision involving a number of parcels in the vicinity of Meadow Lane, Fairfield Road and Leach Lane (unimproved) and is requesting concept /sketch plan review by the Planning Commission. PROCESS Whenever a subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner, or authorized agent, shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance with the procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 121. The submittal of a sketch plan is the first step in the major subdivision process. It involves an informal review by Staff to outline various planning - related issues associated with a pending project and the identification of items that will need to be addressed in subsequent submittals. Review by the Planning Commission and City Council is optional and not required by the City Code but is recommended and encouraged for larger projects. To assist in the discussion, the Planning Report will address aspects of the subdivision process. Staff notes that the following comments are offered for general discussion purposes and that additional items may be identified during the formal review of subsequent application materials submitted. ... BACKGROUND AND SITE INFORMATION In November 2013, the Council approved the request from Mr. Fredrichsen for vacation of certain portions of unimproved Hullett Avenue that abut PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086 and PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079 which he owns and were former tax forfeit parcels. in August 2013, he purchased PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080 which is located immediately north of PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079. Mr. Friedrichsen also owns the property at 5913 Fairfield Road which is located immediately east of PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086. As part of the requested street vacation, the applicant prepared a preliminary layout, to demonstrate what a possible subdivision in the area could look like if the affected streets were vacated. The subject property is generally wooded and is currently vacant / unimproved. At present, the subject area lacks frontage on an improved street as the improved portion of Fairfield Road ends in the vicinity of Meadow Lane. It is surrounded by residential uses including a home located at 5921 Fairfield Road which would be located immediately east of the proposed new road to be constructed in the previously platted Leach Lane ROW. As stated above, the applicant owns the property at 5918 Fairfield Road which is located east of proposed Lot 1. There are also new homes in the neighborhood that were recently constructed as part of the former Anderson subdivision and on Meadow Lane. As part of the proposed development, Fairfield Road would be extended to the west to include a turnaround and a 24 -foot road would be constructed within the right of way of Leach Lane along with a cul -de -sac (22 foot radius) to provide access to the proposed 3 new lots. For details regarding the proposed subdivision, please refer to the submitted application materials and project narratives that were provided by the applicant. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan. The City's current Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Low Density Residential, which allows for single - family detached and attached housing types within the density range of 1 to 6 units per acre. Density is computed area wide as opposed to an individual site. The proposed subdivision meets the Comprehensive Plan guidance. -945- Zoning. The subject property is located in the R -2 (Single and Two Family Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of the City Code. The applicable standards of the R -2 District per Sec. 129 -100 of the City Code are as follows: The applicant provided preliminary information related to the proposed new lots on the concept /sketch plan (Sheet 1 of 2) for review and discussion. Subdivision. The proposed lot arrangement will be processed as a major subdivision as described in Sec. 121 -35 of the City Code as the proposed subdivision requires the construction of public facilities and improvements. Staff also notes that variances or other required approvals (i.e. conditional use permit, etc.) could be needed depending upon the final design submitted and its conformity with Sec. 121 (subdivision) and 129 (zoning) of the City Code. Floodplain . Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.3 (Floodplain) in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be floodplain on the subject property. Per code, all new structures must meet or exceed the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or be three feet above the OHWM of wetland, as applicable. Wetlands. Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.4 (Wetlands) from the 2030 Mound Comprehensive Plan, there are wetlands in the vicinity of the subject area, however they appear to be offsite. The need for a wetland evaluation /report will determined in cooperation with Staff /Consultants as part of any future submittal. Applicant is advised that the City of Mound is the Regulatory Governmental Unit (RGU) for application of the Wetland Conservation Act (LGU) related to a boundary determination. All other wetland permitting is the responsibility of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD.) 6,000 sq. ft. lot Area Lot Frontage 40 ft. Lot Width 40 ft. Lot Depth 80 ft. Front Yard Setback 20 ft. Side Yard Setback 10 ft. Rear Yard Setback 15 ft Imperviousness 30 The applicant provided preliminary information related to the proposed new lots on the concept /sketch plan (Sheet 1 of 2) for review and discussion. Subdivision. The proposed lot arrangement will be processed as a major subdivision as described in Sec. 121 -35 of the City Code as the proposed subdivision requires the construction of public facilities and improvements. Staff also notes that variances or other required approvals (i.e. conditional use permit, etc.) could be needed depending upon the final design submitted and its conformity with Sec. 121 (subdivision) and 129 (zoning) of the City Code. Floodplain . Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.3 (Floodplain) in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be floodplain on the subject property. Per code, all new structures must meet or exceed the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or be three feet above the OHWM of wetland, as applicable. Wetlands. Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.4 (Wetlands) from the 2030 Mound Comprehensive Plan, there are wetlands in the vicinity of the subject area, however they appear to be offsite. The need for a wetland evaluation /report will determined in cooperation with Staff /Consultants as part of any future submittal. Applicant is advised that the City of Mound is the Regulatory Governmental Unit (RGU) for application of the Wetland Conservation Act (LGU) related to a boundary determination. All other wetland permitting is the responsibility of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD.) INFRASTRUCTURE Storm Water. Stormwater permitting is under the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) following regulatory authority turn back to the District by the Mound City Council which took place in August, 2011. streets / Grading / Utilities. Currently there is not an improved street that can provide access to the proposed lots. Thus, the proposal includes construction of a 24- foot road with a cul -de -sac in the unimproved portion of Leach Lane, as well as a "turnaround" for vehicles in the unimproved portion of Fairfield Road. Preliminary grading and utilities were shown on the submitted concept /sketch plan. Park Land Dedication. Dedication of park land and /or payment of fees in lieu of land dedication is required by Sec. 121 -121 of the City Code. If a future subdivision is approved, Staff recommends the submittal of a cash payment in lieu of park dedication. For major subdivisions, the approved 2014 fee is 10 percent of the current land value per Hennepin County Tax Information. Payment of park dedication will be collected prior to release of the resolution. MCES Sewer Area Charge (SAC). The 2014 MCES fee for a SAC unit is $2,485.00. MCES charges will be collected at the time of building permit issuance at the rate in effect at that time. City Water /Sewer Trunk Charges and Connections Fees. The 2014 trunk water fee is $2,000.00 per lot and the 2014 trunk sewer charge is $2,000.00 per lot. Payment of trunk water and trunk charges will be required prior to release of the resolution unless Council approves an alternate schedule. The 2014 sewer connection fee is $240.00 per lot and the 2014 water connection fee is $240.00 per lot. Payment of sewer connection and water connection fees for each lot will be collected at the time of building permit issuance. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the concept /sketch plan application and supporting materials were forwarded to involved departments, consultants and agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: City Attorney Melissa Manderschied. I reviewed the plans and my only comment is that there will need to be a variance for the Lot 3 depth setback. Some of those 30% cover measurements are very tight. I'll defer to the Fire Department on the road and related matters as I recall those had to do with Fire Department truck turning radius. ., Building Official Scott Qualle. No comments. City Engineer Dan Faulkner. Probe Engineering has done a good job in responding to the items we discussed at the February 26th meeting. The following are my comments that are more design related versus concept layout: - the watermain is now shown as a looped system; the Dept of Health requires a 10 -foot separation from sanitary sewer lines which will be difficult to construct given the 24 -foot wide roadway and the existing lot 4 (5921 Fairfield) and deck and no easement; this may require some re- design to relocate the proposed sanitary and watermain lines. there are no off -site contours shown where storm drainage will be going off -site via the proposed spillway; may need some type of stilling pond or attenuation. if there's a high point in the proposed watermain line, other than at the hydrant, some type of air release valve will be necessary. DISCUSSION 1. Staff, including representatives from the Public Works and Fire Department, met with the applicant and his engineer on February 26, 2014 to discuss an earlier version of the concept /sketch plan and supporting information that had been deemed incomplete. Following the meeting, a revised concept /sketch plan was received on March 25, 2014 to respond to comments from the meeting primarily related to a revised road design and turnaround areas; also to provide some preliminary topography. 2. Applicant is advised that the code requires public hearings by held by both the Planning Commission and the City Council for major subdivisions applications. 3. Applicant has been in contact with the private utility companies related to the proposed subdivision. Copies of the concept /sketch plan application materials were also forwarded by the City as part of the routing process. 3. The project involves the construction of new infrastructure including but not limited to, street improvements and utilities. All costs associated with these activities are the responsibility of the applicant /subdivider. 5. As part of a future subdivision application, written consent by any lien holder(s) may be required and would determined in cooperation with the City Attorney. Additionally, bank or lien holder(s) consent would also likely be required for the dedication of public drainage and utility easements. 6. Evaluation of the proposed lots' conformity with the R -2 standards and discussion with the applicant is requested related to the lot frontage and lot depth requirements because of the proposed road improvements and cul- de -sac to be constructed. See below excerpts from City Code: Sec. 129 -100 states as follows: "Minimum lotfrontage on an improved public street shall be 40 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul -de -sac shall be 40 feet at the front building setback line." Per Sec. 129 -2, lot depth is defined as follows: Lot depth means the mean horizontal distance between the front lot line and the rear lot line of a lot. Per Sec. 129 -2, lot line (front) is defined as follows: Lot line, front, means that boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public street. In the case of a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street or as otherwise designated by the Community Development Director based on the practical front yard of the property as determined by such factors as the existing or proposed building configuration of the property and taking into consideration the characteristics of the surrounding properties. If the dimensions of a corner lot are equal, the front line shall be designated by the owner and filed with the city. For purpose of this chapter, a lot shall have only one front setback. 7. Parking on both sides of the proposed new street and turnaround will be prohibited. Mel W U) Lj- W Q U H WiU �7 by m 0 m 1 .W ' 3.90,5£ 3 Q'p z p J W � ��,�3 1734 1 � Z �9NI151%3 p MM J oa'os ° 3 „90,92. IOS E � M % Pw L13I)IO J 62 � u . cJ Fp - O _ - - — MAO?JWINn 1 a31VOVn 3nN3nV NOV3 nN3AV UOV91 3 905205 00' _ 3 „O,94(OON 96i9LI ( IL Z - or 3 „OZ,Sb.00N 3nN3nV g a $ jg"E i P'P'-!; Olt g 3y!s °� wpm$ -m PH mi ;,sqa= � <R6 wz E wdEE O @`o S'E9 jstl .�Tga zzE PHI $5� z pg -z-3 _5= OBE ° - NaE H we mV c s£m� Fed rco >. <9�0 m`� mdm Q m_ `oE V w z �w 0 U ¢p w of o o ¢� a a� m 0 m I Q'p z ptoOC J W � ��,�3 1734 1 � Z �9NI151%3 J 62 � u . cJ Fp - O _ - - — MAO?JWINn 1 a31VOVn 3nN3nV NOV3 nN3AV UOV91 3 905205 00' _ 3 „O,94(OON 96i9LI ( IL Z - or 3 „OZ,Sb.00N 3nN3nV g a $ jg"E i P'P'-!; Olt g 3y!s °� wpm$ -m PH mi ;,sqa= � <R6 wz E wdEE O @`o S'E9 jstl .�Tga zzE PHI $5� z pg -z-3 _5= OBE ° - NaE H we mV c s£m� Fed rco >. <9�0 m`� mdm Q m_ `oE V w z �w 0 U ¢p w of o o ¢� a a� `oo d E � a �u s a gA Ht aao ° § "ta c gma _mcmE Ul2 ip vomem w §�asoo eu',sES "g °h8 >o�e m 0 m �a z °€ d `oo ¢ J a �u s a gA Ht aao ° § "ta c gma _mcmE Ul2 ip vomem w §�asoo eu',sES "g °h8 >o�e Kent Friedrichsen 5913 Fairfield Road Mound, MN 55364 April 28, 2014 Attn: City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 -1687 This letter is in response to the City Of Mound letter dated April 15, 2014 from Community Development Director Sarah Smith regarding the Major Subdivision Concept /Sketch plan application that was deemed complete and ready for review by the City of Mound Planning Commission from myself the applicant and the response letter from the City of Mound reviewed based on Staff's review of the submitted materials, of the application (Kent Friedrichsen) originallay submitted on and additional information requested in the RE: Determination of Completeness - Determination of Completeness — Concept /Sketch Plan from Community Development Director, Sarah Smith. Plan The City of Mound Staff has confirmed the Major Subdivision Concept /Sketch Application has been reviewed and Deemed complete. With regards to the proposed Major Subdivision Concept /Sketch Plan request, Staff respectfully offers the following comments. Applicant's response to comments to City of Mound Determination of Completeness — Major Subdivision Concept /Sketch Application Determination of Completeness — Concept /Sketch Plan letter dated April 15, . 2014 follwing revised plan submitted March 26, 2014 from comments from February 2014 meeting. Responses to Comments from April 15, 2014 letter from City of Mound. Comments and Responses 1. Additional information needed about the proposed 4.7 figure noted atthe rear of Lot 1. We are thinking it may be referencing the distance to the existing building on the lot to the south but are not certain. Response: the figure. 4.7 referenced is correct and from the property line. The building (garage) on neighbors property located at 5924 Idlewood Road is ten feet south of the property line. So the distance is correct on the Major Subdivsion Concept /Sketch Plan otherwise the garage would be build up to the property line which it is not. -18- -951- 2. If possible if would be nice to have approximate size of the future homes. This information does not need to be included on the survey but should be provided as supplemental information for review. Response: The target size of the homes is approximately 3600 square feet finished. Since these will be custom homes the exact size cannot be determined at this time. Also, it depends on the market demand and consumer preference after final plat is approved. Builders will not provide specific cost information etc. until prelimary or final plat is approved according to the 5 or six builders I have had review the Major Concept /Sketch application. The initial target market price of homes was in 375, 000 to 450,000 range. This ultimately will depend on when and if approval comes forward as far as timing and what the market will desire at that time. So information provided is initial assumption, but could change slightly depending on when lots are ready and homes available to be marketed. 3. We have some concern about the proposed amount of impervious coverage as the submitted materials do not show stoops and sidewalks to the front door. However, the driveways do appear to bit on the large size so there will probably be room to accommodate them. As you are aware, hard cover on non lots or record is limited to no more than 30 percent. Response: All Final New Construction home applications will meet the city requirements of no More than 30 percent of each lot being impervious coverage. This would include steps sidewalks etc. The house pads included in the Major Subdivision Concept /Sketch plan display the largest amount possible that a house meeting all the set back requirements etc. could be not the actual final size. 4. Staff is evaluating the submitted information for the proposed lots related to the applicable codes regulations for frontage /width /depth /setbacks, etc. to determine the need for variance(s) approval including, not limited to, a lot depth variance on lot 3. Response: Applicant understands and will comply with and submit requests for any required variances that may be needed per city codes and regulations. Although are goal in the Major Subdivision Concept /Sketch Plan meeting with City staff and interested third parties in February that the new submitted plan hopefully as minimized or eliminated as many variances as possible if not all. 5. Preliminary comments were received from Lynn Longfield from Xcel Energy by email on March 27, 2014 and are being forwarded to you as a separate email. Staff was also copied on an email from Ms. Longfield to you on April 7, 2014. Response: I have been proactively since July of 2013 contacting the utilities companies to gather information and requirements for any development or impacts and cost that may arise from the project. Lynn Longfield has been extremely helpful and responsive to my questions -19- -952- and needs. I have been gathering as much preliminary detail for cost estimates etc. She provided the worksheet that was emailed to you and myself as information Xcel will need to estimate cost, timing etc. of project possible needs for electrical utility changes. Currently believe each new house would not need more than 400 amp service at most and I expect to pay for all lines to be buried to new and any existing properties that may be impacted across the projects property. 6. Additional comments and questions regarding the proposed Concept /Sketch plan may come up as we proceed with preparation of the Planning Report in advance of future planning commission meeting. At this time, the possible date for Planning Commission review is Tuesday May 6, 2014. If requested City Council Review of the proposed Concept /Sketch Plan would be scheduled as soon as possible following review from Planning Commission. Response: Will be available to answer any questions or comments that can be answered for this application if needed and will respond as soon as possible and with best available information. If there are any comments or questions that do come up before Planning Commission meeting or during this application process, please let me know. I can be reached at 952- 334 -8390 or kentfriedrichsen@Vahoo.com. Sincerely, Kent Friedrichsen Applicant 5913 Fairfield Road Mound, MN 55364 -20- -953- Sarah Smith Subject: FW: Response to City of Mound Major Subdivision Concept/Sketch Plan Feeback Attachments: Kent Friedrichsen 04282014 Response City Of Mound.pdf From: Kent Friedrichsen [ mailto :kentfriedrichsen@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 3:17 PM To: Sarah Smith; Christopher Ockwig; lynn .m.longfield(cDxceleneroy.com Subject: Fw: Response to City of Mound Major Subdivision Concept /Sketch Plan Feeback Update to response to item #5. Load per house. Per my building contacts expect 200 amp load on occassion would run 200 amp &150 amp fines if customer requested based on need. What I can say for now. Expect all lines existing and new to be buried on project property. Kent Friedrichsen 5913 Fairfield RD Mound, MN 55364 952 - 334 -8390 On Monday, April 28, 2014 2:37 PM, Kent Friedrichsen <kentfriedrichsenQyahoo. corn > wrote: Hi Sarah, Please see attached document for responses to your letter 04152014 and 03272014 regarding comments and questions on the Major Subdivision Concept/Sketch Plan. Sincerely, Kent Friedrichsen 5913 Fairfield RD Mound, MN 55364 952 - 334 -8390 21- -954- PREPARED FOR: KENT FRIEDRICHSEN PROJECT NO. 15255.00 SCALE : 1" =30' (985.6) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION Existing Zoning R2 No On Street Parking Allowed Maximum Impervious Allowed = 3017o Minimum Lot Depth = 80 Feet Minimum Lot Width = 40 Feet O Q r OV C rn C C LE UCL � Q O) Z o t i I FD IF 980.2 PROPOSED SPILLWAY TNH 981P4 40 N Ng 807H SIDES SIGNS H SIDES OF STREET o EXISTING A FD IF N TO BE REMOVED Y 980.9 SIDE 33 FD IF 962.0 98A' � l7 FD IF 24 983.2 `\ 74.2 , -' LOT 4 i I \ 8,008 SF 00 0 0 �'if EXISTING H USE X ul �\ z 0 o �W °VIII f \ o zm \ LL 24.0 f \ FD IP co i Front Setback = 20 Feet Min. Rear Setback = 15 Feet Min. Side Setback = 10 Feet Min. O Lot Front Side Rear Depth Width o (20'Req) (10'Req) (15'Req) (80'Req) (40'Req) 1. 20.0 *20.2 15.3 111.4 87.8 2. 20.5 *25.0 15.3 108.7 90.5 3. 20.0 *16.7 15.1 74.2 98.2 (* indicates shortest side setback CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLANNERS and LAND SI RING IN4, INC. m._-1 \ -" t, 985.2 r 1 � FD IF `FD IF' 4b CP 75 f 1 985.1 980.2 \ ` SIDE �l 68 `, T �`'o 9, 755 SF 2 -tJ CV ` A O= 8,843 SF \ �� t ~\ !Y1 di 87.81 90.5 O C._ "'\I ILLU ROAD FD IF LOT N 3 f 986.4 FD IF 985--" f 987.2) E / ^I 1_ �` � 988.9 ,r^� f f 04 f7 � I I w �I 3� 3f �{ =I zf o$f 3 N 2 �%9ryf N iI 0 x O Z W I I I BUILDING LOT 11 PREPARED FOR: KENT FRIEDRICHSEN PROJECT N0. 15255.00 SCALE : 1" =30' (985.6) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION Exi5tinej Zoning R2 No On Street Parking Allowed Maximum Impervious Allowed = 30% Minimum Lot Depth = 80 Feet Minimum Lot Width = 40 Feet Front Setback = 20 Feet Rear Setback = 15 Feet Side Setback = 10 Feet Lot Lot 30% Max. Impervious Area Area Imp. Allowed Proposed 1. 9,755 sf. 2,926 sf. 2,917 sf. 2. 8,843 sf. 2,653 sf. 2,648 sf. 3. 8,008 sf. 2,402 sf. 2,401 sf. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, ROBE PLANNERS and LAND SIJR% NGINEERING COMPRNY, INC. T 148th ST.. SM 240. WMISW I F MN 55337 PH W CONCEPT SHEET 2 of 2 FD IF I 980.2 u i I I ELD�" WV READ fD IF 992.2 1 a N EXISTING BUILDING —LOT 11 1 MEMORANDUM May 8, 2014 To: City Mayor and City Council From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Subject: Request for Action on a On -Sale Liquor License and Sunday Liquor License for Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails, LLC Proposed Action: MOTION BY SECONDED BY , TO APPROVE AN INTOXICATING ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE FOR STEPHANI BOYUM AND PAUL BOYUM FOR CATTAILS KITCHEN N COCKTAILS, LLC AT 2544 COMMERCE BOULEVARD IN THE CITY, CONDITIONAL UPON ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENSING BEING MET. Overview: On April 8, 2014, the City Council approved Resolution 14 -24 which is a Conditional Use Permit for a Class III Liquor Service Restaurant for the property at 2544 Commerce Boulevard. An intoxicating on -sale liquor license and Sunday on -sale liquor license application was submitted to the City on October 23, 2013 by Stephani Boyum for the operation of a new restaurant business to be known as Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails, LLC, located at 2544 Commerce Boulevard in the City. Conditional Use Permit Per Resolution 14 -24, the resolution will not be released for recording at Hennepin County until conditions 7, 11, and 17 contained in the CUP have been satisfied and an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. Condition 17 states that the resolution will not be released for recording at Hennepin County until the liquor license has been approved by the City. Liquor License Application On receipt of an application, City Code, Section 6- 49(a), requires the city to conduct a preliminary background and financial investigation on the applicant. Ms. Boyum's license application included a rental agreement with Mr. Paul Boyum. Mr. Boyum testified on the -957 - printed on recycled paper conditional use permit application at the March 12, 2014 regular City Council meeting. In his testimony, Mr. Boyum indicated that he is not only a landlord but also a major investor in Ms. Boyum's business. Pursuant to Minnesota Rules, 7515.0410 (F), and City Code, Section 6 -50, which prohibit the issuance of the retail liquor license to someone leasing the premises from an ineligible licensee. As such, the city regards Ms. Boyum and Mr. Boyum as co- applicants and a background and financial investigation was undertaken for both. The Orono Police Department undertook the required investigation and has provided a written recommendation and report to the Council as required by Section 6- 49(b). The Orono Police Chief's written recommendation is included in this packet and the background investigation report is included under separate cover. City Code, Section 6- 49(a), provides that no license shall be issued if the results of the investigation show to the satisfaction of the Council that issuance would not be in the public interest. City Staff noted that the applicants' business plan, as submitted to the city, indicates that Ms. Boyum intends to provide server training to her employees. Although such training is not a current city code requirement, City Staff recommends such training as being in the public interest. State law requires that the license be issued only for a space that is compact and contiguous. Staff notes that the CUP and associated liquor licenses will be limited to the proposed floor plan prepared by RDS Architects and submitted to the City by the applicants for inclusion in the CUP request. The area was also defined in condition #2 of the CUP resolution as follows: 2. The CUP for the Class III liquor service restaurant is limited to the proposed floor plan and seating area plans as shown on the modified plan submitted on 2 -19 -2014 that was prepared by Richard Storlien of RIDS Architects. Use of the former banquet area for restaurant use is not part of the current CUP and, therefore, not allowed. Conversion of the former banquet area, which is currently shown as office and storage space, and any future outdoor dining area or patio are not part of the current CUP request and are, therefore, not allowed unless a CUP amendment is approved. The applicants provided the City Clerk with an incomplete certificate of insurance. The applicants have not yet provided proof of compliance with the state workers compensation insurance requirements. The City Clerk also notes that the certificate indicates that the current insurance policies expire on 7 -1 -14. The staff recommends issuance of the liquor license for the Licensed Premises subject to the applicant providing the City Clerk with a complete certificate of insurance, the payment of all required fees and charges, and compliance with the requirements of local, state, and federal law, ordinance, and regulation. Primary Matter(s) for Consideration: • Is the issuance of the requested license in the public interest? Budgetary/Fiscal Issues : The applicants have paid the investigation fee required by City Code. The annual fee for an on -sale intoxicating liquor license in the City is $5,000 and a Sunday on -sale liquor license is $200. Pursuant to City Code, section 6- 48(c), this amount is prorated such that the license fee due at this time is $433.33, which assumes the license is issued in June of 2014 for one month. The applicants will be required to request a license renewal effective July I" with payment of at least % of the annual fee due by June 30'h and the remaining %z due by December 31 st Attachments: Resolution No. 14 -24 — CUP Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails, LLC Business Plan RDS Architects Modified Seating Plan for Cattails Bar & Restaurant Written Recommendation from Orono Police Chief, Correy Famiok Application and Background Investigation Report (provided in a separate packet/please return to Staff after the meeting). CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14 -24 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) APPLICATION FROM STEPHANI BOYUM FOR A CLASS III LIQUOR SERVICE RESTAURANT, AS DEFINED BY CITY CODE SEC. 129 -2 AT 2544 COMMERCE BOULEVARD TO BE CALLED CATTAILS KITCHEN N COCKTAILS PC CASE NO. 13 -32 WHEREAS, applicant, Stephani Boyum, submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Class III restaurant for a proposed new restaurant called "Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails" to be located at 2544 Commerce Boulevard. The CUP would allow for alcoholic beverages to be served in the restaurant and also to have both live and pre- recorded entertainment; and WHEREAS, the subject property, which is commonly known as the former Chamberlain - Goudy VFW Post No. 5113 (or VFW club), consists of the following described parcels in the Hennepin County Property Information system: 23- 117 -24 -11 -0028 23- 117 -24 -11 -0009 23- 117 -24 -11 -0010 ; and WHEREAS, the subject property is owned by First Minnesota Bank who consented to the CUP application; and WHEREAS, First Minnesota Bank entered into a purchase agreement to sell the property to Paul Boyum. The building and property are to be leased from the proposed new owner (dba PFB Properties LLC) to Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails LLC, with Stephani Boyum serving as its owner; and WHEREAS, the subject site is zoned B -1 Business District; and WHEREAS, a Class III liquor service restaurant is allowed in the B -1 Business District upon approval of a CUP; and WHEREAS, Sec. 129 -2, defines as a Class III liquor service restaurant as follows: ; and "Class 111 liquor service restaurant means restaurants where food and intoxicating liquors are served and consumed by customers while seated at a counter or table and /or restaurants which contain entertainment, either live or prerecorded. Food sales in such facilities shall account for a minimum of 50 percent of a restaurant's gross receipts on an annual basis." •.w Resolution No. 14 -24 WHEREAS, the property fronts Commerce Boulevard on the west side and the Lost Lake wetland, which is part of Lake Minnetonka, on the east side. The property is bordered by the Gillespie Center to the south and a single - family residential use to the north. There is off street parking available on the south and east sides of the property. There is also on street parking located on the east side of Commerce Boulevard; and WHEREAS, Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails will be a full service restaurant with an operating liquor license to sell on premise alcoholic beverages. As part of the requested CUP, they also plan to offer live entertainment (i.e. bands, comedians, etc.) and pre- recorded music (i.e. karaoke, juke box, DJ, etc.). They also plan to host special events several times a year; and WHEREAS, the existing space in the building that was formerly used as a banquet or special event hall will be used for offices and storage space and will not be used for restaurant space. The applicant has also indicated that they may want to construct an outdoor patio area in the future. Use of the existing banquet space for restaurant or rental space and the construction of outdoor patio activities would require additional review as a CUP amendment; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a liquor license application which is currently under review by the City; and WHEREAS, details regarding the proposal are contained in Planning Report No. 13 -32, Executive Summary No. 13 -32, and the supporting materials provided by the applicant; and WHEREAS, Sec. 129.38 requires that all requests for Conditional Use Permits are reviewed by the Planning Commission and also requires that a public hearing be held by the City Council. Procedurally, state statute requires that the planning agency and /or governing body must hold a public hearing on all requests for Conditional Use Permits; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Conditional Use Permit application for the proposed 215 seat, liquor service restaurant at its January 21, 2014 special meeting and recommended Council approval, subject to conditions, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, following the Planning Commission meeting, a modified floor plan signed by a licensed architect was submitted for review which reduced the seating for the proposed restaurant to 135 seats and also showed the space on the north side of the building to be used for offices and storage space; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing at its March 12, 2014 meeting to receive public testimony on the proposed Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the City has considered the proposed project as it might affect public health, safety or welfare and will be imposing conditions upon the approval addressing these considerations; and me Resolution No. 14 -24 WHEREAS, in granting approval of the Conditional Use Permit, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The proposed restaurant use is deemed to be similar to the former VFW club which had included a restaurant and banquet room and had an operating liquor license. Sufficient parking exists on and around the subject site to accommodate the restaurant use. 3. Class III liquor service restaurants are allowed in the B -1 District by conditional use. 4. Reuse and infill of existing buildings is viewed as favorable. 5. The criteria in Sec. 1 29-38(a) of the City Code are met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining a liquor license from the City of Mound and State of Minnesota which shall include the submittal of all required information. Approval of the CUP for a Class III restaurant does not guarantee or entitle applicant to any future approval of a liquor license. The CUP for the Class III liquor service restaurant is limited to the proposed floor plan and seating area plans as shown on the modified plan submitted on 2 -19 -2014 that was prepared by Richard Storlien of RIDS Architects. Use of the former banquet area for restaurant use is not part of the current CUP and, therefore, not allowed. Conversion of the former banquet area, which is currently shown as office and storage space, and any future outdoor dining area or patio are not part of the current CUP request and are, therefore, not allowed unless a CUP amendment is approved. 3. The City reserves the right to require future evaluation of the site related to the Class III restaurant CUP for Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails, if needed, in the event parking becomes a problem. This may include review and processing of a CUP amendment, if deemed appropriate, including the need to provide additional parking, reduction in the seating capacity, or other action to fit the use to available parking. Applicant is advised that deficient parking or failure to provide adequate parking for the existing use and proposed use(s) is considered a violation of the Conditional Use Permit and therefore subject to regulations pursuant to City Code Section 129.38. 4. Applicant shall be required to follow all local and state regulations relating to when alcoholic beverages may be allowed to be served. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all required local or agency 962- Resolution No. 14 -24 permits. In addition to the liquor license, including but not limited to, the required licensing approvals from Hennepin County for the new restaurant and all applicable permits required by the building and fire codes, prior to undertaking work. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any and or all related permits or approvals from the City required for special or outdoor events. Approval of the CUP for a Class III restaurant does not guarantee or entitle applicant to any future approval of any permit required for special or outdoor events. 7. Applicant is responsible for obtaining a Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) determination from the MCES in the event the restaurant use changes or expands. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of related charges. As applicable, the CUP shall not be effective until written confirmation from the MCES is received and payment is made. 8. Applicant shall place outdoor ash trays in any outdoor areas where smoking may occur and shall be responsible for daily routine maintenance of this area as well as the entire property and adjacent sidewalk area to include pick up and removal of trash /refuse and improperly disposed cigarettes. 9. Signage shall conform to the regulations contained in City Code Chapter 119 (Signs). Applicant or designated representative shall be responsible for obtaining all required permitting prior to undertaking work. 10. The individual parcels that make up the subject property shall be combined. 11. Payment of all fees associated with review of the applicant's request for Class III restaurant use including, but not limited to, the CUP and any and /or all related activities. 12. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. 13. The resolution will not be released for recording at Hennepin County until conditions 7, 11, and 17 contained herein have been satisfied and an escrow of sufficient amount Is on file with the City. 14. The applicant shall have the responsibility of filing the resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. The applicant shall also be responsible for providing proof of recording and providing evidence of such recording with the City of Mound. At its option, the applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 15. The restaurant shall meet the City Code regulation and MPCA noise -963- Resolution No. 14 -24 standards for ambient noise. 16. This conditional use permit amendment is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: Lots 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 32; That pad of the West 30 feet of Lot 33, lying between the Easterly extensions of the Northerly and Southerly lines of Lot 26 as measured along said extensions; That pad of Lot 33, lying Southerly of the Easterly extensions of the Northerly line of Lot 30 across said Lot 33; All in Auditor's Subdivision No. 167, Hennepin County, Minn. 17. This resolution will not be released for recording at Hennepin County until the liquor license has been approved by the City. Adopted this 8th day of April, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor MM Kb L LC, Created for the City Of Mound, MN By: Stephani Boyum owner of Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails LLC. Mission- Is to provide a safe, friendly, fun environment to bring the community together. To become one of the leading dining and entertainment venues in Mound MN. Objectives Personal Plan- Includes the implementation of fulfilling necessary positions to operate effectively and efficiently. Jobs will be created for wait staff, bartenders, bouncers, cooks, cleaning and maintenance, musicians, sober cab drivers, book keepers and management as needed. Target Market- Customers are individuals, families, friends, organizations, etc. who prefer casual dining and beverages (alcohol or not) and entertainment. Management- Will be lead by Stephani Boyum and Paul Boyum. Paul's background experience encompasses previous bar & grill ownership, sober cab management, and construction (electrical) services. These entities have provided Paul with invaluable experiences in tavern V operations, customer service, safety procedures and consumer preferences and habits. Community involvement- Will include, but not be limited to implementing the assisted funding program of charitable organizations through pull -tab sales, meat raffles, bingo, video racing, etc. examples of these programs may be community Hockey Associations, Football programs, and other supporting organizations deemed non - profit. Benefits will be held on occasion when approached for the monetary need related to health issues and other individual family and or organization crisis. Benefits may also be hosted for fund- raising groups etc. such benefits are an act of community involvement and good will gesture. Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails Ilc. will be a full service restaurant with an operating liquor license. Financial- our objective is to establish a profitable, self supporting full service restaurant. Business ours- 8:00am- 1:00am Sunday through Saturday (subject to vary) Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails Ilc. will provide a full spread menu, also including breakfast. (see menu attached) Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails Ilc. will provide a wide variety of music including but not limited to live bands (guitars, drums, bass, jazz, blues) Juke box, karaoke, DJ, Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails lic. will provide activities \events among all ages including but not limited to; Grand opening, Car shows, Comedy shows, MMA fights, benefits, -965 -A Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails lic. will provide a non profit organization to host such things; pull tabs, meat raffle, "bar" bingo, This organization will also provide any "non profit temporary permits or license" in which any event Cattails holds is required. Marketing Strategies- Advertising- strategies will be incorporated through means of media, signage, web design, and more. Products- for sale will include food, beverage, apparel, accessories, items with Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails Ilc. logo for advertising and revenue purposes. Activities- such as tent \outdoor will be held to gain public awareness of the facility and to enhance sales. Music- live music will be provided for the entertainment and leisure experience. - 965 -i3 Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails will provide a wide range of responsibly trained staff including but not limited to; General Manager Assistant Manager of all areas Cooks \Chief Bartenders Servers Waitress Security *All persons serving alcoholic beverages will complete certification through Minnesota Alcohol Server Training Course Outline Alcohol Awareness Intoxication and alcohol elimination factors The effects of blood alcohol content ® Signs of impairment; poly- impairments and club drugs Server Responsibilities ® Monitor, card, intervene, and document ® Duty of care; drinking is a privilege ® SCAB customer unwanted behavior assessment Carding ® When and why to check ID 7 Steps of Checking IN Inteventions ® When to intervene intervention methods and techniques Minnesota Alcohol Laws ® Current Minnesota laws Valid Minnesota identification procedures and techniques Surrounding states IDs Thank you for taking the time to review the Business Plan As I am prepared to enter a business venture through the creation of Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails in Mound MN I am equally prepared to contribute to the community by providing Jobs, creating revenue, contributing to the success of charitable organizations, and hosting events for the leisure and enjoyment of those attending. I look forward to working with the city of Mound and I will take responsibility in maintaining a safe, clean and enjoyable facility for our community and patrons. will abide by the laws governing the city, county, and state. -967- nDS �A'RCCH- Toe City of Mound plan review Frame Rick Storiien Datee 2/2812014 Re* Cattails Bar & Restaurant Letter to confirm proposed seating capadty of new Restaurant and Bar. Bar seating capacity = 31 stools Dining Room seating 21 tables wl4 seats ea. = 84 seats Game Room/ Dance area 5 tables wl4 seats ea. = 20 seats Parking requirements minimum of 1 stall per 3 seats Total seating = 135 seatsI3 = 45 parking stalls required. 68 stalls provided on site. Feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns regarding the project. Richard Storlien RDS Architects Ltd. rick @rdsarc.com 1 -968- rill Proudly Serving Orono, Minnetonka Beach, Spring Park and Mound Dedicated to Fairness, Service, Pride and Quality May 5, 2014 Mound City Council, The Orono Police Department has conducted a background investigation and local records checks to include cities that the following have lived or have had businesses in. The persons listed below have no violations or prior conduct that would prevent them from being issued a liquor license per MN State Statute 340A.402. Business: Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails 2544 Commerce Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Applicants: Stephani Marie Boyum 6058 Old Kiving Blvd. Anoka, MN 55303 Paul Francis Boyum 6058 Old Kiving Blvd. Anoka, MN 55303 If you have any further questions or concern, please feel free to contact this department at 952- 249 -4700. Mailing Address. 2730 KeTicy earkway - Orono, MN 55356 Police 911 ^ Administration 952 -249 -4700 • Non - Emergency 763 - 525 -6210 • Fax 952- 476 -3028 Websim: http : / /www.ci.orono.mn,usi'police CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION APPROVING A PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING AT CATTAILS KITCHEN N COCKTAILS, LLC WHEREAS, the Northwest Tonka Lions, Inc. has submitted a Premises Permit Application for gambling, abiding by the laws of Minnesota governing lawful and rules of the Gambling Control Board; and WHEREAS, the local government must adopt a resolution specifically approving or denying said application; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby approves a Premises Permit Application submitted by the Northwest Tonka Lions, Inc., for Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails, LLC, for submission to the Gambling Control Board. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -971- Mayor Mark Hanus MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING LG214 Premises Permit Application 12/12 Page 1 of 2 Annual Fee $150 (NON REFUNDABLE) Required Attachments to LG214 1. If the premises is leased, attach a copy of your lease. Mail the application and required attachments to: Use LG215 Lease for Lawful Gambling Activity. Gambling Control Board 2. $150 annual premises permit fee, for each permit 1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South (non refundable). Roseville, MN 55113 Make check payable to "State of Minnesota." Questions? Call 651 - 539 -1900 and ask for Licensing. Organization Information 1. Organization name Northwest Tonka Lions, Inc. License number 01830 2. Chief executive officer (CEO) Roy Peterson Daytime phone (952) 210 -6626 3. Gambling manager Marjorie Lemke Daytime phone (612) 597 -5357 Gambling Premises Information 4. Current name of site where gambling will be conducted Cattails Kitchen & Cocktails S. List any previous names for this location Chamberlain- GoudyvFW 5113 -Mound 6. Street address where premises is located 2544 Commerce Blvd Do not use a P.O. box number or mailing address. 7. City Township OR County Zip code Mound Hennepin 55364 8. Does your organization own the building where the gambling will be conducted? F] Yes l r v i No If no, attach LG215 Lease for Lawful Gambling Activity. A lease is not required if only a raffle will be conducted. this OYes z No ❑Don't know 9. Is any other organization conducting gambling at site? HNo at this site? E]Don't know 10. Has your organization previously conducted gambling —ZYes Gambling Bank Account Information. Must be in Minnesota. 11. Bank name Bank account number Crow River Bank Mound Minnesota 09123 12. Bank street address City State Zip code 2290 Commerce Blvd Mound MN 55364 All Temporary and Permanent Off -site Storage Spaces 13. Address (Do not use a P.O. box number) City State Zip code 2590 Commerce Blvd Mound MN 55364 14. Address (Do not use a P.O. box number) City State Zip code MN -972- LG214 Premises Permit Application 12/12 Page 2 of 2 by Local Unit of Government: Approval by Resolution CITY APPROVAL COUNTY APPROVAL rAcknowledgment for a gambling premises for a gambling premises located within city imits Localunitofgovernment Y must - Sign located in a township County name Date approved by city council Date approved by county board Resolution number Resolution number Signature of city personnel Signature of county personnel Title Date signed Title Date signed TOWNSHIP NAME Complete below only if required by the county. On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying to conduct gambling activity within the township limits. [A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an application, per Minnesota Statutes 349.213, Subd. 2.] Print township name Signature of township officer Title Date Acknowledgment and Oath 1. I hereby consent that local law enforcement officers, 6. I assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful the Board or its agents, and the commissioners of operation of all activities to be conducted. revenue or public safety and their agents may enter 7. I will familiarize myself with the laws of Minnesota and inspect the premises. governing lawful gambling and rules of the Board and 2. The Board and its agents, and the commissioners agree, if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, of revenue and public safety and their agents are including amendments to them. authorized to inspect the bank records of the 8. Any changes in application information will be submitted gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill to the Board no later than 10 days after the change has requirements of current gambling rules and law. taken effect. 3. I have read this application and all information 9. I understand that failure to provide required information submitted to the Board is true, accurate, and or providing false or misleading information may result complete. in the denial or revocation of the license. 4. All required information has been fully disclosed. 10. I understand the fee is nonrefundable regardless of 5. 7am the chief exec t ve officer of eorganizatlon. license approval /de ial. Signature of thi xe&btive Officer (designee may not sign) Date Print name Roy Peterson CEO Data privacy notice: The information requested on this Board. All other information provided will be Safety; Attorney General; Commissioners form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling private data about your organization until of Administration, Minnesota Management Control Board (Board) to determine your organization's the Board issues the permit. When the & Budget, and Revenue; Legislative qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Board issues the permit, all information Auditor, national and international gam - Minnesota. Your organization has the right to refuse to provided will become public. If the Board bling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant supply the information; however, if your organization does not issue a permit, all information to court order; other individuals and refuses to supply this information, the Board may not be provided remains private, with the excep- agencies specifically authorized by state able to determine your organization's qualifications and, tion of your organization's name and or federal law to have access to the as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. If your address which will remain public. information; individuals and agencies for organization supplies the information requested, the Board Private data about your organization are which law or legal order authorizes a new will be able to process your organization's application. available to: Board members, Board staff use or sharing of information after this Your organization's name and address will be public infor- whose work requires access to the infor- notice was given; and anyone with your mation when received by the mation; Minnesota's Department of Public written consent. This form will be made available in alternative format, i.e. large -,raille, upon request. -973- MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING LG215 Lease for Lawful Gambling Activity Revised 11/12 Page 1 of 2 Organization Address License /site number Daytime phone Northwest Tonka Lions Inc. P.O. Box 201/259990 Commerce Blvd. Mound 55364 01830 612- 597 -5357 Name of leased premises Cattails Kitchen & Cocktails Street address 2544 Commerce Blvd. City Mound State MN Zip 55364 Daytime phone 763- 412 -2682 Name of legal owner Business /street address Blvd. City Mound State MN Zip 55364 Daytime phone 76 Stephani Boyum 2544 Commerce - Name of lessor [if same as 8"ner, write in "SAME" _ Check applicable item: 1. New lease. Do not submit existing lease with amended changes. Date that the changes will be effective. Submit changes at least 10 days before the effective date of the change. 2. New owner. Effective date Submit new lease within 10 days after new lessor assumes ownership. Check all activity that will be conducted (No lease required for raffles) ❑✓ ❑Electronic pull-tabs [must also sell paper pull -tabs] Pull tabs [paper] ❑Linked electronic bingo dispensing device ❑ Puli -tabs [paper] with ❑Bar Electronic games may only be conducted at: bingo ❑ Bingo (1) a premises licensed for the on -sale or off -sale of intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent Tipboards malt beverages [but does not include a general food store or drug store permitted to sell alcoholic beverages under Minn. Stat. 340A.405, subdivision I]; or Paddlewheel ❑ Paddlewheel with table (2) a premises where bingo is conducted as the primary business and has a seating capacity of at least 100. PULL -TAB, TIPBOARD AND PADDLEWHEEL RENT Separate rent for booth and bar ops. BOOTH OPERATION - Some or all sales of gambling; equipment are conducted by an employee /volunteer of a licensed organization at leased premises. ALL GAMES, including electronic games - Monthly rent to be paid, _%, not to exceed 10% of gross profits for that month. • Total rent paid from all organizations for only booth operations at the leased premises may not exceed $1,750. • The rent cap does not include BAR OPERATION rent for electronic games conducted by the lessor. 'IBAR OPERATION - All sales of gambling( equipment conducted by the lessor or lessor's employee. ELECTRONIC GAMES - Monthly rent to be paid, _ %, not to exceed 15% of the gross profits for that month from electronic pull -tab games and electronic linked bingo games. ALL OTHER GAMES - Monthly rent to be paid, 10 %, not to exceed 20% of gross profits from all other forms of lawful gambling. • If any booth sales conducted by a licensed organization at the premises rent may not exceed 10% of gross profits for that month and is subject to booth operation $1750 cap. BINGO RENT for leased premises where bingo is the primary business conducted, such as bingo hall. Bingo rent is limited to one of the following: • Rent to be paid, %, not to exceed 10% of the monthly gross profit from all lawful gambling activities held during bingo occasions, excluding bar bingo. -OR - • Rate to be paid $ per square foot, not to exceed 110% of a comparable cost per square foot for leased space, as approved by the director of the Gambling Control Board. The lessor must attach documentation, verified by the organization, to confirm the comparable rate and all applicable costs to be paid by the organization to the lessor. • Rent may not be paid for bar bingo. • Bar bingo does not include bingo games linked to other permitted premises. LEASE TERMINATION CLAUSE. Must be completed.; The lease may be terminated by either party with a written 30 day notice. Other terms Ni items paid for by The Northwest Tanks Lions must be removeable upon lamination of the lease. 974- 0 LG215 Lease for Lawful Gambling Activity Revised 11/12 Page 2 of 2 Lease Term - The term of this agreement will be concurrent with the Other Prohibitions - The lessor will not impose restrictions premises permit issued by the Gambling Control Board (Board). on the organization with respect to providers (distributor or linked bingo game provider) of gambling - related equipment Management - The owner of the premises or the lessor will not and services or in the use of net profits for lawful purposes. manage the conduct of lawful gambling at the premises The organization may not conduct any activity on behalf of the lessor on the leased premises. Participation as Players Prohibited - The lessor will not participate directly or indirectly as a player in any lawful gambling conducted on the premises. The lessor's immediate family and any agents or gambling employees of the lessor will not participate as players in the conduct of lawful gambling on the premises, except as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 349.181. Illegal Gambling - The lessor is aware of the prohibition against illegal gambling in Minnesota Statutes 609.75, and the penalties for illegal gambling violations in Minnesota Rules 7865.0220, Subpart 3. In addition, the Board may authorize the organization to withhold rent for a period of up to 90 days if the Board determines that illegal gambling occurred on the premises or that the lessor or its employees participated in the illegal gambling or knew of the gambling and did not take prompt action to stop the gambling. Continued tenancy of the organization is authorized without payment of rent during the time period determined by the Board for violations of this provision, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 349.18, Subdivision 1(a). To the best of the lessor's knowledge, the lessor affirms that any and all games or devices located on the premises are not being used, and are not capable of being used, in a manner that violates the prohibitions against illegal gambling in Minnesota Statutes 609.75. Notwithstanding Minnesota Rules 7865.0220, Subpart 3, an organization must continue making rent payments under the terms of this lease, if the organization or its agents are found to be solely responsible for any illegal gambling, conducted at this site, that is prohibited by Minnesota Rules 7861.0260, Subpart 1, item H or Minnesota Statutes 609.75, unless the organization's agents responsible for the illegal gambling activity are also agents or employees of the lessor. The lessor must not modify or terminate the lease in whole or in part because the organization reported, to a state or local law enforcement authority or the Board, the conduct of illegal gambling activity at this site in which the organization did not participate. Acknowledgment of Lease Terms The lessor, the lessor's immediate family, any person residing in the same residence as the lessor, and any agents or employees of the lessor will not require the organization to perform any action that would violate statute or rule. The lessor must not modify or terminate this lease in whole or in part due to the lessor's violation of this provision. If there is a dispute as to whether a violation occurred, the lease will remain in effect pending a final determination by the Compliance Review Group (CRG) of the Gambling Control Board. The lessor agrees to arbitration when a violation of this provision is alleged. The arbitrator shall be the CRG. Access to permitted premises - Consent is given to the Board and its agents, the commissioners of revenue and public safety and their agents, and law enforcement personnel to enter and inspect the permitted premises at any reasonable time during the business hours of the lessor. The organization has access to the premises during any time reasonable and when necessary for the conduct of lawful gambling. Lessor records -The lessor must maintain a record of all money received from the organization, and make the record available to the Board and its agents, and the commissioners of revenue and public safety and their agents upon demand. The record must be maintained for 3 -1/2 years. Rent all- inclusive - Amounts paid as rent by the organization to the lessor are all- inclusive. No other services or expenses provided or contracted by the lessor may be paid by the organization, including but not limited to: - trash removal - janitorial and cleaning services - electricity, heat - other utilities or services - snow removal - lawn services - storage - security, security monitoring - cost of any communication network or service required to conduct electronic pull -tabs games or electronic bingo - in the case of bar operations, cash shortages. Any other expenditures made by an organization that is related to a leased premises must be approved by the director of the Gambling Control Board, Rent payments may not be made to an individual. I affirm that this lease is the total and only agreement between the lessor and the organization, and that all obligations and agreements are contained in or attached to this lease and are subject to the approval of the director of the Gambling Control Board. Other terms of the lease All Items paid for by the Northwest Tonka Lions must be removeable upon termination of the lease. re of Print nom nd title of le r Print nabre- antrtitle of lessee Stephani Boyum /Owner Roy Peterson CEO Questions? Contact the Licensing Section, Gambling Control Board, at 651 -539 -1900. This publication will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. Data privacy notice: The information requested on this form and any attachments will become public information when received by the Board, and will be used to determine your compliance with Minnesota statutes and rules governing lawful gambling 3ctivl_07r,- ub.'�;3Lds,:"<V's,si'.;,_,;; r; r,.t:,',:_ rzri z M 4 im z rn T I I ykF ti A x' 70 W a s n� 5 r Y cat m D -C -C �p nit! C F I,ki,d,fi,m MEMORANDUM DATE: May S, 2014 TO: Mayor Hanus & City Council Members FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Mana ' RE: Controlling private business on public lands and public waters 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 YH: (852) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com There has been some undesirable fallout that has resulted from public relations efforts promoting Mound as a place to do business. The City has since experienced individuals doing business from our parks, beaches and waters. Last summer at least two private business operators came and went from Surfside Park and Beach and did business there, at will, on a daily basis (jet skiis and stand -up boards). Their web sites list this location as their location of business. Another bay became the testing area for a jet ski repair business. Efforts were made by Orono Police Department and Hennepin County Sheriffs Department to remove their presence but without success. Staff has been advised by Chief Correy Farniok that Mound must have a policy that prohibits the unpermitted use of public parks, beaches and waters, thus reserving those places for the use and enjoyment of general users. The Staff Recommendation is to prohibit private business on all public lands and public waters, to prevent a business operator from setting up a seasonal business of any kind utilizing City infrastructure (i.e., a rack of kayaks at the greenway, rented from the end of the pier; an oil change business in the parking deck, etc.) This policy proposal is for all city property, infrastructure and waters, not just Surfside Beach and Park, because Staff recognizes that these types of fly -by -night business operators will be pushed to other City beaches, boat ramps and waters, or may even tether within shallow waters to meet up with their customers. The City Code amendment being recommended provides for individual consideration of activities such as the Farmers' Market, when deemed suitable by the City Council. -977- printed on recycled pener CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -2014 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 50 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO PARKS AND RECREATION The City of Mound does ordain: Section 1. Article I of Chapter 50 of the Mound City Code is hereby amended to add the following new sections: Section 50 -1. Purpose and intent. The City of Mound is entrusted by the public with the responsibility of managing the public lands, public parks, public commons, public infrastructure, and public property located in the City for the use and enjoyment of all persons. The City parks, green spaces, beaches, waters, piers, trails, parking lots and other public facilities offer opportunities for a broad range of public uses including gatherings, personal and group recreational activities, concerts, picnics and peaceful meditation. The City is committed to providing access and use of parks, green spaces, beaches, waters, piers, trails, parking lots, and other public facilities in order to sustain the quality, accessibility, and vitality of these spaces and facilities now and in the future. The City recognizes that the commercial use of these public resources by private parties can be inconsistent and against the interest of public, deplete public resources, and jeopardize the sustainability of these public resources. In furtherance of this recognition, the City desires to prohibit the sale or rental of goods, products, or services by private parties on property owned or operated by the City when such goods, products, or services are delivered immediately upon sale or rental by the private party selling or renting the good, product, or service except when otherwise permitted by the City Code or the laws and regulations of the State. Sec. 50 -2. Prohibition. Except as otherwise permitted by the City Code or the laws and regulations of the State, the display, offer, or attempt to sell or rent goods, products, or services by private parties is prohibited on property owned or operated by the City when such goods, products, or services are delivered immediately upon sale or rental by the private party selling or renting the good, product, or service. Sec. 50 -3. Penalty. Any person found in violation of Section 50 -2 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 443597v2 MJM MU220 -2 Passed by the City Council this _ day of Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Effective the day of -979- 443597v2 MJM MU220 -2 2014 Mayor Mark Hanus 2014. MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 4, 2014 Vice Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Vice Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath (7:02), Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone, Pete Wiechert and Mark Wegscheid. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Art & Barb King (2964 Pelican Pt Cir), Allison Sisk (6221 Westedge Blvd), Nick Bellomy (6221 Westedge Blvd), Greg & Jory Covell (2637 Westedge Blvd), Madison Sisk (1035 W Cove La), Jill Sisk (1035 W Cove La), Margie & Dan Saatzer (2625 Westedge Blvd) APPROVE MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Goode, second by Gawtry, to approve the agenda as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 7T" AND 21ST 2014 MOTION by Goode, second by Penner, to approve the January 7, 2014 minutes. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Gawtry, second by Bergquist, to approve the January 21, 2014 minutes. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS Appeals Request — Keeping of Alpacas 6221 Westedge Boulevard Applicant: Allison Sisk Smith introduced the request. The applicant is requesting that keeping of her four alpacas be allowed as they are companion animals and similar to a pet dog. Her property consists of 2 lots in the R -1 Residential District. The keeping of alpacas is not listed as a permitted, conditional or accessory use in the R -1 zoning district. The keeping of alpacas is not allowed under the provisions contained in Sec. 14- 2 of the City Code. Staff finds the alpacas to be similar to animals commonly found on a farm, such as cattle, horses, pigs, sheep or goats. •:I Smith indicated that staff received 2 letters of support. Ms. Sisk also provided a summary of daily activities and other information on the care and keeping of alpacas. Stone questioned the code listing animals "intended for slaughter ". Smith said that alpacas aren't referenced specifically in the code. Allison Sisk (6221 Westedge Blvd) gave background information. She said that her alpacas are from 60 -80 pounds where her Great Dane is 160 pounds. Alpacas have no upper teeth and are extremely gentle. She maintains that they are a benefit to the community — vet students visited as part of their study. He has had them since November. Smieja asked about typical weight. Sisk said 60 -150 pounds. Retterath asked about noise. Sisk said they make a small hum noise. They are mostly outdoor animals. Sisk answered several questions about the breed. Waste is confined to one very small area for all four animals, was considerably less than anticipated and is valuable for gardeners. Retterath asked if they would be spooked by a passing vehicle. Sisk said they are very calm. Wegscheid asked how the city became aware of the alpacas. Smith indicated that a report came in from someone and Mike Wocken responded. Marjorie Saatzer (2625 Westedge Blvd) said the alpacas are outside her kitchen window. The dogs in the neighborhood are more of a nuisance. It's fun to have them. They like Mound because it's unique. Jory Covell (2637 Westedge Blvd) really loves having the alpacas in the neighborhood. Retterath conjectured that the 1960 rule was established when Mound was growing and becoming more dense. It's highly likely that the ordinance was written to allow those who had animals at that time to continue. Gawtry doesn't think it's a problem. Retterath questioned whether other alpacas are bigger. Sisk replied that alpacas range from 60 -150 pounds. Her animals are on the smaller side. If they are allowed it would allow an animal at about 150 pounds (no bigger than a Great Dane). Animal count would be another thing. Goode is not sure that more than 3 animals in households in Mound is really unusual. Wiechert asked if alpacas were considered exotic. Sisk said no. Smith stated that staff classifies alpacas as a farm animal. If it is deemed to be a companion animal or a pet would require a code change. Retterath asked where the line is between reasonable and excessive when it comes to animal count. Goode thought that Council should look at change in code to permit alpacas. From this point a discussion about procedure ensued. The question: is it more similar to livestock or closer to a companion animal (i.e. cat or dog)? MOTION by Goode, second by Wiechert, to acknowledge that current code does not allow alpacas in any zoning district and recommend the City Council consider changing the Code regarding the keeping of alpacas because the commission believes they are more a companion animal than livestock. MOTION carried unanimously. Planning Case No. 13 -31 Modified Sketch /Concept Plan 2201 Centerview Lane Applicant: Art King Smith introduced the applicant's plan to subdivide the 20,265 square foot property at 2201 Centerview Lane. The house is currently in conformance to lot of record requirements; however, once the subdivision occurs all three lots will be subject to the R -2 lot standards for new lots. The lot with the existing home will then have a nonconforming side yard setback on the south of 6.9 feet. Lot depth for proposed Lot 14 and 15 will need to be further evaluated by the surveyor and staff. The garage and house on Lot 14 and 15 should also be moved so that a front yard setback of 20 feet can be maintained. Gawtry believes that all changes have been positive. Art King (2964 Pelican Point) — Lot depth is up to interpretation. The surveyor could not tell him if met 80 foot depth requirement. He was under the impression that the garage could be turned and the required setback from the road would be less. The buildings can be moved to accommodate the requirements. He wanted a little bigger backyard for the kids to play in. Smith explained the side - loaded garage requirements. Retterath demonstrated a measurement from the angle lot line along Noble to the rear and easily came up with 80 feet to meet minimum. Retterath supports the concept design. He also has no problem with the 6.9 foot setback but would like to see a slightly larger garage. OLD /NEW BUSINESS Election of Chair and Vice Chair for 2014 MOTION by Wegscheid, second by Stone to appoint Cindy Penner as Chair and David Goode as Vice Chair. MOTION carried unanimously. Staff Update / Council Liaison Report Smith • Enjoyable volunteer dinner • Schedule training for Stone and Smieja • PH for the CUP next CC for Cattails • Evaluate expansion permit regulations • Chickens & bees went to the CC last week. Council did not wish to change bee regulations (off premise concerns) but directed staff to evaluate chicken regulations and how it applies to Mound in real life. They asked staff to contact other communities that have allowed chickens for several years and their experience with them. TIF District legislation request to extend our district is in the works Gawtry requests staff look into the Free Church electronic sign; blinking, spinning, distracting. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Penner, second by Gawtry, to adjourn at 8:34 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander •. Vint � M 1• Fire Commission Meeting Wednesday May 7, 2014 11:00 a.m. — 1:00 p.m. 1. General Information and Updates • 2013 Department Annual Report • 2013 Department Highlights and HOT TOPICS Review • 2013/14 Department Accomplishments 2. Hot Topics and Fire Chiefs 2014 Priority Projects • Insurance Services Office Public Protection Class Audit — April 15, 2014 • Fire Service and Fire Department NEWS • Our Staffing Plan - Recruiting, Hiring, and Retention of Volunteer Firefighters • Update: Changing MFD Response Protocols and Duty Officer Program 3. Financial and Budgets • 2013 Budget vs. Expenditures, Fire Fund Balance, Apparatus Replacement Fund • 2014 Capital Improvement Plan, Apparatus and Equipment Purchases • MVFD Relief Association Pension Plan Actuarial Valuation as of 12/31/13 • New Supplemental State Aid Program Overview • MFD Grant Awards and Tracking - Overview • Apparatus Replacement Needs - CIP 4. Other NEWS and Follow up • Fire Code Compliance and Forms • West Hennepin (Lakes Area) Fire Group • MVFD Relief Assn. Fish Fry and Dance 2014 June 7, 2014 5. Adjourn f Mound Fire l Department 63'dAnnual Fish Fry and Dance Tickets: $10.00 Advance $12.00 at the Door Dance to Big /' and the JamE 1. Strategic Plan is important — like any business, and I (we) have been working it • People, Apparatus, Equipment, Facilities • Succession Planning underway, with promotions, hiring, training 2. Staffing is the Strategic Plan #1 Priority • - Recruiting and Retention of firefighters (Hired 6 new firefighters as of March 4 2014) • Staff time management for volunteers (Duty Officer Program Starts April 6, -2014) 3. Administrative and Organizational changes in 2013 (done and ongoing) • Reorganization of Administration and Operations • Blue Card CTC, probationary firefighters, staff training • Accomplishments for MFD in 2013/2014 4. MFD Budgets have been tight with minimal $$ increases (frugality) for years Budget Challenges list continues to grow, but close $$ management critical 0 2014 Budget Increase 1.82% . 4 year budget increase 11.35 % average 0 Overview and History of Grant Requests (and grant request. philosophy) CIP— Apparatus and Replacement of 1980 Sutphen Aerial Ladder Truck 6 Fire State Aid - Supplemental Aid for 2013 s Pension Plan Changes and Actuarial Valuation 12/31/2013 results 5. MFD Accomplishments that happened in 2013/2014 ® St. Bonifacius Fire and City Automatic Aid • insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection Class Audit;(WIP) • Refer to List in Annual Report M.M. i+e � M O N C N 0 � E Ce V d 7 y @ N 'I r W W O N M O n Y9 a 3 0 1 r �r W u, O q �- NM V Nlpr W AO�N M<N W r W W OWN r N N N N M V N Ntpr N N N W N W N M 0�-!� M W at O N N {LLk N 0 � N W A N N N b N N M W N Q< N N M W N N N N C b S LL iy N NNNN N M M W 41- ANN N N O N.O M r NN NN O M p W N-7 W r N� -NNNg D .r N :N n d - C 0 n ) U C o Z = 0 o d d d NNm N N L W v f 2 W �¢> d 10 aai m >o Z c aai m e LL T3 o °`f..'.q.. w :w o °>>mn La >m�md..Nm a Y avaNN W mLL yLLyLL c >.C_ Oa j d cSLL...LL y IOyL cLL W LLL LL dLL mILLL N 2 �. .; N h' UCE cdmwo y�m LL.O omEct°�c .j '�C� iCXT(Y pro cc HY oE> n SfappOgYf. cc�' m> W W c LL n W W.d ` W O _m o W c W n y W W.. cn mW m Q UaU N _ :yn f% LLmry..rQ Fr a c� N.12 i d L e L > o d d G U G O c m c D c m L >S : LL o Ti Em _ .q _U i9 n2 ya � 22 � n 2"a n 7a M =EY2 '. rT>i E Q En € r Q Un p d m a L 'nom L¢ >ql0 >E d € €°' d@ 2 CL LL LL LL E Y. LL LL W LL ILL LL LL Q Q LL i-y LL � Y.: tl LL IL W V d N .N 2 d d v 2 2 d E L W W W Ld L LL IW L {L LL�1 'it ll la.LL LL ILLLLLL LLli t!LLLL LLIL lL I1Y IL LL lL{LLL iL U LL K N y mg c tl a m o 0 E O H5 m _W m aa, Q m m > n m m 'O U so LL¢ LL d a3i d E aLL w d d c d E dMO Ea Eat mLa d Oaa =� and C E q = o E> q a E d t >d ?� E q d EE U -oU E Y and ga d d nod m n C_ � g m q c m c ry c 0 yv� y GN W 00.0 `UU ONSN(n�OYJOrOON p LUU p N-_I ~N Cf N(D W NNtDNNN.. W V N N O W O W N W: p 00 p O O V r �NO.N W m W W mNN W M QN < "'Rom N Vt N N N � m q q q q q q '� q'.q Y'� `m '� d t5`5 ca' m Yl =5 m m jr a C a c yq, n c.c b` m a a c a- c'- a c Ca$b m N r a c m aag'a q a c a r m a-g m a c Uc d d c '5 N > N cC.E U� d > 2 > > > d:N cc = C C > C"2 > > o Y J _. :Egfr NN (n a) .'C. .c0.m c c f a MM N N M N Mly`{.M O O O N N MMMf7�Y�ty' O N O O O N O M(hM N MME^ t�IMMMI�m N��( p�3$V`1 M I- OmN��OaVN �OV RHN���� �NNNMCJMC3 N_N N�[1 N�D� maOm Oi.� 00- mNNNN "'N`.('F �T I� t�t�p ul K QNCWJ Z pp. NN W W V N W <� G ^'S� m @ <� V bNNlulj NKNi N N 987 A fire protection area needs a ladder /service company for each ladder /service location credited under Section 560, Deployment Analysis. Also, a fire protection area needs a ladder /service company in an existing fire station when that station serves 50% or more of a standard response district not within 2'/ road miles of other ladder /service companies. A standard response district is a built -upon area with a creditable water supply (as defined in Section 201A3) within a response distance of 2'/z road miles. The additional needed ladder /service locations must be fire stations identified as needed in Section 510A. As an alternative to determining the number of needed ladder /service companies through the road -mile analysis used in Section 560, the authority having jurisdiction may provide the results of a systematic performance evaluation. Such an evaluation analyzes computer -aided dispatch (CAD) history to demonstrate that, with its current deployment of companies, each fire department meets the time constraints for initial full -alarm assignment in accordance with the general criteria of NFPA 1710, Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments. A. NUMBER OF NEEDED LADDER COMPANIES;(NL): Individual ladder /service response areas with at least 5 buildings of 3 stories or 32 feet or more in height (ground to eaves) or with at least 5 buildings that have a Needed Fire Flow greater than 3,500 gpm or with at least 5 buildings meeting any combination of those criteria must have a ladder company. When no individual response area needs a ladder company, the fire protection area needs at least 1 ladder company if buildings in the fire protection area meet the criteria above. B. NUMBER OF NEEDED SERVICE COMPANIES (NS): Ladder /service response areas not needing a ladder company according to Section 540A must have a service company. 541 NUMBER OF EXISTING LADDER /SERVICE COMPANIES (EL/SC): A. NUMBER OF EXISTING LADDER COMPANIES (EL): For a company serving in the capacity of a ladder company, on the initial alarm to all reported structure fires, and equipped according to NFPA 1901, Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus, give credit as an existing ladder company if a ladder company is needed according to Section 540A. For an apparatus serving in the capacity of a ladder company, equipped according to NFPA 1901, and considered as an existing engine company in Section 511, give 50% credit as a ladder company (engine - ladder) in this section if a ladder company is needed according to Section 540A. © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 30 Equipment " Needed Credit/Unit Total Points SCBA (30- minute minimum) 4 24 96 Extra cylinders (carried) 4 6 24 Salvage covers (minimum size of 12'x 14') 6 2 12 Electric generator (3,000 watt) 1 25 25 Portable floodlight (500 watt) 3 4 12 Smoke ejector (5,000 cfm) 1 20 20 Portable thermal cutting unit 1 20 20 Saw — power (chain or heavy -duty rotary type) 1 20 20 Electric handlights 4 2 8 Pike pole (plaster hook): 3' or 4' 2 2 4 6' or longer 4 2 8 Radio: Mounted 1 32 32 Portable 1 16 16 Ladder: 24' extension or longer 1 25 25 16' roof or longer 1 25 25 10' attic or longer 1 4 4 14' combination or longer 1 5 5 Total 35R *Of sufficient height to reach the roof of any building, or 100 feet, whichever is less. The credit shall be prorated if existing equipment has insufficient reach. © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 44 -989- Points Needed__.Credit/Unit _Total Points ___ Ladder: 16' or longer roof 1 25 25 35' or longer extension 1 25 25 Elevated stream device* 1 100 100 Large spray nozzle (1,000 gpm) 1 16 16 Aerial ladder /elevating plafform* 1 200 200 Annual tests (aerial /platform, see Table 542C) 1 50 50 Total 416 *Of sufficient height to reach the roof of any building, or 100 feet, whichever is less. The credit shall be prorated if existing equipment has insufficient reach. © Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 44 -989- ;H `0 3 O O V 0 N N M N N N N M M M N N N N N CYr N Ri N C4 N L'l-I N Ri N 0.. N N N U U 0 CIS x x cd in. 91. o b db�b"Cl ^c$7:17S"dbbbbbvbbIC) 00 o 0 0 00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 Cj vl n cn cn H U G u U O 'a� Y CL CL A, ti O cd rL O U y O as N .• cd U U ti >, >, d��d ° b0'.•� vi .}a W � •.. b Y � ,-+ VJ x F-I F Y (�U-1� Md �QyJ N A A � Q U U o w d S o o o. Qn .V a a a -on 3 3>> ° ° °° U ° w Q 3. 0 >> G •� v v °O a n n °otn 3 3 ro N cd N M •^� •� {�.� Cry 1C$ •"' fd F{RV$ .�' /.f/d� RS �.+ u r 1✓ � /-1 (,[ L-' a Yil U U W a CV W O a a W C5 L Fa Vi V VX b b b > b b b b b b H H }' (� N H i°+ iU, lUi O .L'" ° N iii sU-i IUi Y-r tU+ H ?; .� b •o .o Q° g 3 3 El .o A UUUUUUU cc 9' 60)Z lulu UU cn ..wC7.CJa.a�'OO��C/)i.H. v1 O O N �O h 0 O 0 0 00 oo r+ � h _ 0 cn N O O cD .-+ .--i O N N O O O O d' oo O N N O N N r1l M N \O N� M M � N V 00 N� 00 N M N <Y N N N (t N V1 N N Vl �O Vl �O cn c0 l� V1 cn M Vl —+ N N O vl O v� O v1 V cn � aan_ 0 'c E Yfici 0 0 0 C/� CIO V] V IT M a Z O _c E m .i O W O u C ro N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U V .54 a4 18 X. ^�. `� .^L 1i ^� k' ^may' `�4 `.� .k .y. .^1. X. N cHd c� � cc cHC 4y. cHd c� cHd cHd cHd cHd N cHC a a, a a. a a a o., P. a. P. P. P. P. a a l a b •O 'Li b b b b b bU OD Oc bD bD a bD bA t>p ttc tc m m bD u u u LJ C c7 O F�' G C = = C,.,. dti O O O O O r: rO /. V� V] Vi UO I �n Uo I cn I VJ I V) cn I UJ cn V] cl� I cl� I V] V] Y Y YY! Y W � un W s0. w a, w 1. Es Q = VI v] U 0 cD y cn cn cn O O O O T.1i OCd O H M 0 m �. C rby ((O A .n 0 ^M ^M ^cl it SC � vt x 0 0 0 0° 0 0 0 Ol ..1 O O O O O o Y ¢, Y ¢, '� W 'i7 s•+ „ x.3...0.. Xi -4 -g1 xt O O M O b b b b b b n n b b Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 5�I S Q r W W W W N N N N g oN N N "b "O 'b N •N 'N V GJ 4J N N N N N N V y rA N N Gi Fir Ci H H H H H H H H y,, h .y .y .= 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o O O 8 o y U] U] V2 V] V1 V] U] V] V] U] V] V] C/) L. Vl Vt vt Vl 'O ID et 7 ti' V V 7 7 7 7 It d' it t d' 141 991- Yfici 0 0 0 C/� CIO V] V IT M a Z O _c E m # � � ? Ln 9 $ q q q q \ ® � - - - -- -.�. .�....... - &95- « � I q Is R� q' o � C U. N :Q [Z d U o o a o o (b 0Op r O O o v � O ((0 O O � m N V N O d 00 cvj O O Q O O O O r N r W W0) (6 O O O O O C) r c'7 M Cl) LID e N r d u c 0 c 10 co o r o o O v m M so 0 o c a o r> r. o rn P o m w O v Q !u c ° 0 r ° h ai 0 ° C W L) O 0) r 0 O aMi O ® M M b O U d p R) @@. 'V co co > V Vl V3 V3 VD Vi V! Vi V! Vb 44. 609 N V) O ®. r O C9 d r O W � P � m W W co 0 w Q � � p® Un r m 1 P n to .t °r? Z v Q m o cv cv cl ui m <f C% t P cY M r Or w LU co M � CD O r O tB w r Nr r r t- 63 V} V3 VF Vi H V} w V9 dt 4a N Vt w Cq z CL tz M 2 Itd 0 m w LU z IL w w _ LL m W w Fp °Q o 00 0 0 0 °o, °o U o 0 00 .� W Q Q O O LO m ❑ Om O N co 000 h W ® m to P cli co co 10 In N M W G �] M � co Cl) 01 r ® O co (Oy £ M N M V V3, 613 613 V3 46 613 V! S N N VD N N 9 C - d ,b o w a Co M N 0! O u > o N w N N d 0) U G 00 `w Q co C C C w C C C Q j V m 49 cc O 0 U = 01 a U 7 O h- N M w F Cl) c) co C rM o C O• 0 co t3 O m W u K cr a w 7 us 0) O 0-0 0 0 r "� —996- P C s O O LL U 0. i 6 Z m y ty A L a >- a` t LLI LU 0 •' FE a a a 6 0 0 0 r A T T O O) N N O O O O N O W m O O O O N N N N m U G N C LL N tD tD V m o a N d N Q 12 Q LL d d m E o `E o E N � a o U O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 O fJ C1 16 N M V O O tU N Ih L U N — I r O p O O p 0 .08000 O O N 0 0 0 0 0 000 sj r ¢ d f P r O N N H O Z Z . tab w pN 7 W W b a N tF m d C N E NI N n O N R f9 m Oy N (A N N N L" C C N o O to .Sv_ y O M O pNp� C M r !n .- N r tW E S N � Os/ A N P• l7 n U C O O O O R dO O O r N Of N O O N OI O p M c0 NB d a O N N N f9 l7 N N r C d O Q C role d m o N d >< r N N OO 'O u E OI N r 6 N rA tMn N N t°o NN 7 E CL m C {� E r O < N O c 10 E ` D9 O N Oi r tf! d Ot v C N N N tl V NO O 6 !ti b ® W Q a F- N OS C V NI oi M ai C° G LL LL LL d' U L d d N � S 0 � a a y ".Y o W 6 Q co v O WFL p Le s ® a 0 R U a $'m z r w U o ma• Udaa� E » av d �E may. e c (~.1 d N O Y R d a T fA K w IL w °w m E r E E m Y Y o c> w 997 F- a w V 2 x s W o w& u x w � r N M � N 10 P: OB fi O 6 0 0 G 6. (s � m U G N C LL N tD tD V m o a N d N Q 12 Q LL d d m E o `E o E N � a o U S E E N @ LL d p> Q i W E n m 0 m M m II d Lo C "w C a E N 6 N li O m a 9 M m n z II FEF M 5 @ m N C A @ IL a ym o? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O Or mN m ` m O O r r ( W M W m 0 W O r m P . .. m W N m m m r O O m M1 �' m Q Q P WOO N N N N e a��� mm , nmrN. yd W m 'm m�NrOO m r m W W m W m N m h'm m m m m W NOON m m tv Oi N a a a C LL O O O O O O .000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C Q O m m m O m m M1 OO tl r vv r N m P r N m M M W M N m r M P m P W W e^ m d C_ 2 Y � a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N19 N N N S a ... o 0 . 0 og0000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z C m' N W O m m Q ON m r r m r O W m P r O1 O m m O O c' m m M1 W m O W m m N O m r V m LL M m O m m N ON m P 6-1 m m m m Cl yd mmm QrWMhmmrQrorrromW a s r NN N N N N N m M M Q M m P Q P O m N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N N tl! N N N N 00 000 00000000000000000 OO000000000000000 .98 O @ m r Q O m r Q P O r n m M N m J ONi Mn�(mpmmMUmi umic.6 N60 om<N m 6 m J0016 V.N NNNNNN 00000 0 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000000000b0000 0 0 0 0 Oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO 0000000000 000000 .G a 0 0 O O O O N h m N O O O O O O O O m N m -i,6 m O O O O O m m m m N m m m m m N N N m m m O N N N N m M M M m P Q P Q Q N N m m m m N m m m m m m m m m m N m m% m m m O m m Coco m m m m d m N N C O b C a LLNN NN NNN -- NNNm NNNmNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNwNU ImNNmN O O O OO O O OO O O O O 000.00 O o O 0 o O O O isr o cco0oo oQ 00 or oNr 0O 0NN 0N 0n 00O 01m � 0mr 0M 0M oO 0m o om h lo mm mm p mmaom Q rm M W O N O (O NO r m r m m0m !0Q'm M W CO lm r N 7 m O N 0 O O N m a N M h n M M r m m m N m r M m n M O m m m P m O O` r m m r O W N N m N Q m r m N O m h W M r W m m m m N N m m N W m N m r m O N d N N N N N O N M Q N N N N N N N @ p F~p-U N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N c o 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 r O N m 0 m O p S O O P O e- m O M N Q m O O O W m m O y m P W Q r m r P N O Q N W r W m r Q r N Q m IA N M r m Q m m N O r N r m m N W r m m r t7 m t7 M m Q m m O W M m y lV m M m m m M W d m O P r M m m m N< m N O m r m m O O r r tq m r Q n r r N m m m O M M1 n w r r m N M f0 m r M m m W r. P m N Q m m 6m N m m Q M m Q m m m m m M P n m m O O P m m O r N m O m m m r M1 Q M n n '46 O O C r N N NM N M M m P Q P Q Q Q Q P Q m r r r r r O U e N m m m M N N N N N NIH N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M Nf9 N N M N N N N m N N N N H C O O O O O O 0 O O O O.O Oo .N0 O O O O o 0 O O 0 o O O O O O 0000000000000 o 0 0 0 O o O o O O O o o O O O O O O o O O O a O o p j (9 O Q r 4r7 W m NO m a m m o 0 M mM m MQmmmNm m O m m yy O mr M O m O O m m O rN O O mmmmmmmo O O 0 m N 0 0 0 0 W M M m Q m m m n O m r m m m N m �l W O N YfrV J W M r m { r M QrO r Q m 1�O (1 C " N r �rO - rNO rNe - r r r O U c 0 a a�ac m NO NO n NO *O wm No NQN Nr NN N0 Nm NO Nm NP Nr VN i• N wm Nm NM Nr NO Nm Nm NO NO NrO NrO NO Vr�-S• w NNNNNNN m0 O O O O O O O M O m O m O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O.O O 00, O O O O m m O m O O m m O O O m O O m m O O m O O O O O O m m n O O O O O O ym Mmm mM m In m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m m m m m r r O N- NNNINNNN(9 WHfNNNNNNNNNNNNN(9N NfRNNNNNNHI d - ---- .0 ao .0 00 0 0 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 000.000000. 00000000000000000 O 00.00 a O O mm ON m0 0 0 MMm000mm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NNmNmrm 0 0 0 00.6 O O omM O M MMmmmr Q m lV M r 3 W O mm P N N O m N r M M N m m m P Q PM mM1 M Q m r O N ® n O O N PN M Q W Q m r P O m m o O m r m m Q r W n W n m m m m m � r r N N N N N N N N m p d N(9 mN NNNNNNNm f9. m W W o rn o �NNNNNNNmNNNN r N 0 0 m Q m m r m m o m r N m m M m Q m m m m n m m m m m m a rn m N M m rn m W m r W W m 0 Q Q m n m 0 0 W o N r m M1 m r rn r m h m r rn r m m m W m m W rn W m m W W W W m rn m m m m .- o N 0 N 0 N 0 N N N N N N N N 0 N N 0 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 0 N N E n m 0 m M m II d Lo C "w C a E N 6 N li O m a 9 M m n z II FEF M 5 @ m N C A @ IL a ym o? Mound Fire - 40 Year Financial Summary Year Operating Budget Hourly gage Pension Contribution 2% Contribution Pension Benefit 1973 $ 3.50 $ 9,743.00 $ 11,514.00 $ 70.00 1974 $ 150 $ 7,410.00 $ 15,090.00 $ 70.00 1975 $ 3.50 $ 10,589.00 $ 12,443.00 $ 70.00 1976 $ 3.50 $ 13 419.00 $ 13,782.00 $ 120.00 1977 $ 3.50 $ 13,158.00 $ 16,300.00 $ 120.00 1978 $ 3.50 $ 20,808.00 $ 18,901.00 $ 145.00 1979 $ 3.50 $ 25,421.00 $ 21,689.00 $ 145.00 1980 $ 5.10 $ 9,780.00 $ 23,906.00 $ 185.00 1981 $ 107 950.00 $ 5.43 $ 41,271.00 $ 26,244.00 $ 185.00 1982 $ 120,050.00 $ 5.80 $ 32,880.00 $ 35,495.00 $ 210.00 1983 $ 5.80 $ 33 000.00 $ 29,974.00 $ 210.00 1984 $ 6.00 $ 36,300.00 $ 31,249.00 $ 240.00 1985 $ 134,650.00 $ 6.00 $ 39,930.00 $ 34,021.00 $ 250.00 1986 $ 142 802.00 $ 6.00 1 $ 43,923.00 $ 39,620.00 $ 290.00 1987 $ 6.00 $ 48,325.00 $ 42,194.00 $ 290.00 1988 $ 221,430.00 $ 6.00 $ 53147.00 $ 44,857.00 $ 350.00 1989 $ 229,230.00 $ 6.00 $ 58 462.00 $ 45,818.00 $ 350.00 1990 $ 234 290.00 $ 6.00 1 $ 64,308.00 $ 46,024.00 $ 395.00 1991 $ 256,000.00 $ 6.00 1 $ 66,880.00 $ 46 041.00 $ 395.00 1992 $ 251,600.00 $ 6.00 1 $ 69,556.00 $ 45,725.00 $ 395.00 1993 $ 274,200.00 $ 6.00 $ 73,338.00 $ 42,738.00 $ 425.00 1994 $ 270,190.00 $ 6.00 1 $ 75,231.00 $ 45,541.00 $ 425.00 1995 $ 285,330.00 $ 6.00 1 $ 80,500.00 $ 48,685.00 $ 425.00 1996 $ 6.50 1 $ 85,394.00 $ 64,108.00 $ 460.00 1997 $ 335,320.00 $ 6.50 $ 88 810.00 $ 63,412.00 $ 460.00 1998 $ 360,220.00 $ 6.50 $ 92,360.00 $ 64 712.00 $ 510.00 1999 $ 409,680.00 $ 6.50 1 $ 96,050.00 $ 66,128.00 $ 510.00 2000 $ 411,520.00 $ 6.50 1 $ 101,810.00 $ 68,798.00 $ 510.00 2001 $ 415,850.00 $ 7.00 $ 105,880.00 $ 73,287.00 $ 585.00 2002 $ 439,470.00 $ 7.50 $ 109,060.00 $ 84,816.00 $ 585.00 2003 $ 464,460.00 $ 7.50 $ 112,340.00 $ 106,83100 $ 585.00 2004 $ 451,410.00 $ 7.50 $ 115,700.00 $ 140,838.00 $ 585.00 2005 $ 479,300.00 $ 7.50 $ 118,600.00 $ 108,098.00 $ 585.00 2006 $ 507,930.00 $ 8.00 $ 122,160.00 $ 116,354.00 $ 585.00 2007 $ 539,730.00 $ 8.00 $ 125,830.00 $ 102,730.00 $ 585.00 2008 $ 587,33100 $ 8.00 $ 129,600.00 $ 86,739.00 $ - 585.00 2009 $ 613,434.00 $ 8.50 $ 133,500.00 $ 75,889.00 $ 585.00 2010 $ 613,658.00 $ 8.75 $ 137,500.00 $ 78,104.00 $ 585.00 2011 $ 615,792.00 $ 9.00 $ 141,625.00 $ 74,362.00 $ 585.00 2012 $ 635,063.00 $ 9.00 $ 143,625.00 $ 73,686.21 $ 605.00 2013 $ 628,211.00 $ 9.00 $ 155,800.00 $ 96,000.00 $ 605.00 2014 $ 158,100.00 $ 99,800.00 $ 605.00 2015 $ 160,500.00 $ 103,800.00 $ 605.00 2016 $ 162,900.00 $ 108,000.00 $ 605.00 2017 $ 165,300.00 $ 112 000.00 2018 $ 167,800.00 $ 116,800.00 2019 $ 170,300.00 $ 121,400.00 2020 $ 172,900.00 $ 126,000.00 Pay Increase = 243% Or 2 1/2 times Pension Increase = 835% or 8 112 times MFD 40 Year Financial Summary - Budget Financial -999 - 7/2/2013 F a w U Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works & Transit H 701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400 612- 348 -9260, Phone Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 612 - 348 -9710, Fax www.hennepin.us Ms. Kandis Hanson City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Subject: Fiscal Year 2015 — 2017 Joint Cooperation Agreement/Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Dear Ms. Hanson: Thank you for your City's participation in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program (Urban County CDBG Program). As you know, Hennepin County is the lead agency for the Urban County CDBG Program, which consists of Hennepin County (County) and 39 suburban communities. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires a Joint Cooperation Agreement (Agreement), which is renewed every three years, in order for the County to qualify as an urban county and receive CDBG entitlement funds on behalf of participating cities. The existing Joint Cooperation Agreement (FY 2012 — 2014) between the County and your City is due to expire September 30, 2014. It contains an automatic renewal clause in Section III that reads: "Prior to the end of the initial term and the end of each subsequent qualification period, the COUNTY, as the lead agency of the URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM, shall provide written notice to the COOPERATING UNIT of their right not to participate in a subsequent qualification period." This letter serves as notification that the current Agreement will automatically renew for another three -year period unless the City notifies both HUD and the County in writing by June 1, 2014 of its intent to terminate the Agreement as of the end of the current qualification period. Under the terms of the Agreement, to remain a participating City in the Urban County CDBG Program, there is nothing more you need to do. By continuing to participate in the Urban County CDBG Program, your City is eligible to receive CDBG funds under the terms of the agreement and will automatically be included in the HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) programs administered by the County. The City will not be eligible to apply for grants under the State CDBG Program. 1001- An Equal Oppartuniry Employer Recycied Paper Ms. Hanson April 18, 2014 Page 2 The Urban County CD participation g na this program has aprogran' history as helped t bring mill ons of tax dollars back to partnership. The Urban County CDBG Program has your community and suburb Hennepin County. helped thousands of seniors and lower- income families Public hlities, neighborhood ervices that maintain/foster independenchousing affordablle housing. improvements, youth programs, If you are considering opting out, the County Your partnership is very important to the County. would appreciate the opportunity to meet before an opt -out letter is sent. Please contact me at (612) 543 -1965 if you have any questions about the Agreement or auto - renewal process. I look forward to continuing our cooperative efforts in addressing suburban Hennepin County housing and community development needs. Sincerely, Margo Geffen Manager, Housing Development and Finance Please direct election letter for the County to: Margo Geffen Manager, Housing Development and Finance Hennepin County Housing, Community Works and Transit 701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Please direct election letter for HUD to: Ben Osborn CPD Representative Minneapolis Field Office 920 Second Avenue South, Suite 1300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 cc: Abby Shafer, Hennepin County -1002- Kandis Hanson Subject: FW: Explorers From: Correy Farniok [mailto:CFarniokCabci orono mn us] Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 11:48 AM To: Chris Fischer; Cynthia Bremer; Cynthia Bremer ( cynthia bremer(&ogletreedeakins com); Dan Tolsma; Heidi Gesch; Jaci Lindstrom; Jessica Loftus; Jessica Werder; JoAnne Anderson (Mayor Minnetonka Beach); Kandis Hanson; Lili McMillan; Mayor Mark Hanus; Ron Olson; Sarah Reinhardt; Shirley Bren; Susanne Griffin Subject: FW: Explorers On Saturday I had the great pleasure to drive to Rochester and attend the awards banquet for the Minnesota Law Enforcement Explorers Conference. Our department sent down 7 police explorers and 3 advisors (Police officers). This was an awesome experience. I saw the excitement in their eyes and faces as I walked toward them as they were lined up in the hall. It only got better as the night progressed. The seven individuals that represented Orono PD did an outstanding job. The first award won was by Ben Wenande. Ben won the Shawn Silvera Memorial Award. This award is awarded annually to the police explorer who best exemplifies the character, personality and professionalism for which Shawn will always be remembered. Shawn Silvera was a Lino Lakes officer killed in the line of duty in 2006. 1 had the privilege to read his essay. Outstanding job!!!!!!! The night continued and our small group of 7 individuals continued to receive academic and scenario based awards for the events they participated in. In a room of 800 -900 explorers and much larger groups from around the metro area and the state of MN, it was very impressive to see the awards accumulating on the table in front of us. At the end of the night there were many table that had no awards, however to see 10 displayed side by side on the table in front of me was beyond words. I was so impressed and proud of these 7 young men that had trained for this. For some it was their fifth conference, but for 3 of them it was their first time competing. I want to thank them for their time and commitment to the program and for their dedication. I am very proud of each and every one of you. Awards received Reporting Writing -5th place Crime Prevention —15` place Bomb Scene Search — 2nd Emergency Field First Aid — 2nd place Interview and Interrogation —4th place Emergency Management -4th place Arrest and Search —4th place -1003- Explorers Carver Christianson Carter Hendrickson Bryce Martin Dylan Rimas Ethan Salinas Ben Wenande Brandon Wenande I can't forget to thank the advisors as well for the great job they do to prepare the explorers for this conference and competition. Jane Phil and Paul attended the conference as advisors, but also the others that helped with the training and support of this program. Thank you and keep up the good work. f a- it Confidentiality Notice: This e -mail message, including any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. m �l t estOnka i ''� �%{zstoncaCs'oci� Westonka Historical Society P.O. Box 84 Mound MN 55364 952- 472 -9800 westonkahistoricalsociety.org The Westonka Historical Society has been invited to display a part of the collection of Tonka Toys at the 10,000 Lakes Concours d'Elegance. It is a prestigious presentation of cars that have to meet a certain set of criteria to be invited. The cars are arranged by year and they depict history of the collectibles in style, color, design and technology. This is the second year of this event and 125 cars have been chosen. it is being held on the Excelsior Commons Sunday June 151 from 10:00 a.m. — 4:00 p.m. Admission is $25 Ron Pauly will oversee the project. He has already identified the toys to be displayed. One (1) volunteer to ride along Sun. 6/1 at 7:30 to attend the toys while they are being unloaded and assist with unpacking. Two (2) volunteers Sun 6/1 from 10:00 — 12:00 Two (2) volunteers Sun 6/1 from 12:00 — 2:00 Two (2) volunteers Sun 6 /1from 2:00 —4:00 Two (2) volunteers Sun 6/1 at 4:00 to pack, transport, and unpack the toys at the WHS museum. We need large pieces of bubble wrap or old towels for packing the toys. Where can we put your name to help? RSVP to Ron Pauly at 952 -472 -1809 or email at moatz2009 @aol.com *Footnote: As a volunteer you will have a pass to get in free. Someone will meet you at the entrance to give you your pass. Also, the event will be cancelled in case of rain. Plan to attend unless notified otherwise. -1005- Via Mail May 1, 2014 Dear Community Official: Theresa Sunde Government Relations Manager Pursuant to FCC regulations governing cable television, we are informing you that Mediacom Communications is making these changes to our channel lineup: Effective on or around June 1: FXX (212) and FXX HD (760) will move from the Sports and Information/ Digital Plus package to Family Cable. Channel locations will remain the same. For newer TV's, it may be necessary to reprogram or re -scan your TV. Additional Equipment or services may be required. Mediacom customers may call 866 - 609 -6180 for more information. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 507- 837 -4878 or email me at tsunde @mediacomcc.com. Sincerely, Headend: Saint Peter Mediacom Communications Corporation 1504 2nd Street SE, -1006 -- -a, Minnesota 56093 MINNETRISTA 1 MOUND SPECIAL CLEAN UP DAY Saturday, May 10, 2014 — 8 am to 3 City of Minnetrista 7701 County Road 110 West Minnetrista, MN 55364 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE ACCEPTED: Paper Shredding -11:00 am —1:00 pm Only - $1.50 per brown paper grocery bag Appliances: $10 each: Dehumidifiers, Dishwashers, Dryers, Freezers, Furnaces, Garage Door Openers, Garbage Disposals, Humidifiers, Microwaves, Refrigerators, Stoves, Trash Compactors, Washers, Water Heaters, Water Softeners. $75 each: gas refrigerator under 4' Batteries: No charge for household batteries. No charge for car batteries. Carpet: $1.25 /per square yard (Jute, Rubber, Foam Padding) Concrete: $1.00 /per construction size block Electronics: $5.00 — laptop computers, stereo, CD players, VCR/DVD players, small printers, computer box $10.00.13 "CRT TV, small laser printers $15.00 —19" CRT TV, CRT computer Monitors, $20.00.25 "CRT TV,large laser print ers * *Hennepin County Drop -off centers accept Electronics year round — FREE— Ask for more info ** Fluorescent Bulbs: 4 ft: $.25 each 8 ft: $.50 each Furniture: $5.00 Chairs and Recliners $8.00 Loveseat $15.00 Sofa $25.00 - Hide -a -bed Mattresses /Box Springs: $15.00 each (ail sizes) Misc Items: $15.00 /cubic yard - Household Plastic, Plastic Toys, Styrofoam, Foam Rubber, Vacuum Cleaners Phone Books: No charge Scrap Metal: No charge for: Lawn Mowers, Swing Sets, Lawn Furniture, Grills, Auto Parts, Springs, Pipe, Metal Window Frames (no glass), Auto Batteries, etc. $1 charge: Bicycles w /tires Tires: $2.00 Car and Pickup $6.00 Semi Truck $25.00 Tractor Household items: NO CHARGE for Clothing, Small working appliances, Games, Domestic Items (pots, pans, dishes, etc), Tools, Lamp, etc will be accepted ANY QUESTIONS: CALL City of Minnetrista at 952.446.1660 or City of Mound at 952.472.0603 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED: Brush, Leaves, Newspaper, Cans, Cardboard, Construction Waste, Garbage, Glass, Hazardous Waste (Paint, Oil Thinners, etc.) Insulation, Lumber Wood, Treated Lumber Gas Refrigerators -1007- Hennepin County Memo Department of Environmental Services Phone: 612 -348 -3777 701 Fourth Ave. South, Suite 700 Fax: 612 - 348 -8532 or 612 - 348 -6510 Minneapolis, MN 55415 -1842 www.hennenin.us Subject: 2014 Community HHW Collection Events Ten Household Hazardous Waste Collection Events are currently scheduled for 2014. The dates and sites are: May 15 - 17 City of Minnetonka — Public Works Site (Site Code: LV) 11522 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55305 May 29 — 31 City of Minneapolis — PW Garage Snelling Ave. Site (Site Code: LA) 360744 1h St. E Minneapolis, MN 55404 June 12 - 14 City of St. Louis Park — SLP Junior High School Site (Site Code: OD) 2025 Texas Ave. S. St. Louis Park, MN 55426 (enter off 22 d St. West) June 26 — 28 City of Minneapolis — Anthony Middle School Site (Site Code: LQ) 5757 Irving Ave. South Minneapolis, MN 55419 (enter off Sunrise Drive) July 31 — Aug. 2 City of Minneapolis — Jenny Lind School Site (Site Code: AL) 5026 Dupont Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55430 Aug. 7 — 9 City of Minneapolis — South High School Site (Site Code: LD) 3131 19th Ave. South Minneapolis, MN 55407 (enter off 21St Ave. S.) Aug. 21 — 23 City of Minneapolis — proposed Recycling & HHW Site (Site Code: OF) 34027 th Ave. NE Minneapolis, MN 55418 Sept. 18 — 20 City of Minneapolis — UoM parking lot C66 Site (Site Code: NY) 2904 Fairmount St. SE Minneapolis, MN 55414 Oct. 2 — 4 City of Shorewood — Public Works Site (Site Code: NW) 24200 Smithtown Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Oct. 9 — 11 City of Minneapolis — PW Garage Snelling Ave. Site (Site Code: LA) 360744 th St. E Minneapolis, MN 55404 Sites will be open to the public from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. each day of the collection. Only household hazardous waste and household problem materials are being collected. The following wastes are not accepted: asbestos (friable) biological waste (medical & infectious) business generated waste compressed gas cylinders & tanks greater than 40 pounds construction debris electronics explosives garbage major appliances oil (motor, transmission, cutting, lubricating, etc.) oil filters pharmaceuticals radioactive recyclables (card board, glass, metal, paper, phone books, plastic, etc.) tires yard waste �009- PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 27, 2014 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda. Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removedfrom the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Open meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims *B. Approve minutes: May 13, 2014 regular meeting *C. Approve permits for Tour de Tonka, with pit stop at Wolner Field, with fees paid 1. Public Gathering Permit 2. Live Music Permit *D. Approve Public Gathering Permit for Fishers of Men Bass Tournament at Centerview Beach, with fees paid: Aug 23, 2014 *E. Approve Pay Request by Advanced Wall Structures, Inc, for Emergency Retaining Wall Replacement at 5097 Three Points Boulevard, in the amount of $33,210.00 *F. Approve Resolution Approving Variance for 6260 Birch Lane, PID #14 -117 -24 -32 -0040 *G. Approve Resolutions for 2201 Centerview Lane, PID #13- 117 -24 -31 -0040 1. Resolution Approving Minor Subdivision at 2201 Centerview Lane - Planning Case No. 14 -05 2. Resolution Approving Variances at 2201 Centerview Lane — Planning Case No. 14 -06 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) Page 1010 -1027 1028 -1034 1035 1036 1037 -1038 1039 -1040 1041 -1065 1066 -1094 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 6. Steve McDonald, representing Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP, presenting the 2013 1095 -1096 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and Management Letter, and requesting Action receiving the same (see separate report) 7. Jay Green, Mound representative to the LMCD, requesting action on Right -of -Entry 1097 for Surfside ramp access to allow watercraft inspectors to perform inspections for the 2014 boating season providing: A. Summary of inspection data from 2013 B. AIS prevention literature 8. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer, with update on costs to move 1098 -1100 City Hall and upgrade the Centennial Building for rentals 9. Mark Wegscheid, Council Member, on the process of providing packets to Council 1101 Members 10. Kandis Hanson, City Manager, on the City's involvement in ribbon cuttings and 1102 ground breakings 11. Kandis Hanson, City Manager, requesting discussion and any action on remembrance 1103 for former Senator Steve Smith 12. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: C. Reports: Bolton & Menk Engineering: Dec 2013 YTD 1104 -1106 Mar 2014 YTD 1107 -1108 Finance Dept: 2014 YTD 1109 -1110 D. Correspondence: Letter from Metropolitan Council with population 1111 -1112 Estimate: May 15, 2014 2014 Westonka DARE Open 1113 13. Adjourn Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. citi�nfi�r�iWhl coin 2014 04- 14BOLTMNK $ 96,884.55 2014 052714CITY $ 96,098.15 2014 052714HWS $ 79,329.84 TOTAL CLAIMS 4444 Fl CffY OF €fiIC1UND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 Batch Name 04- 14BOLTMNK User Dollar Amt $96,884.55 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $96,884.55 $0.00 In Balance Refer 4 BOLTONAND MENK, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 402 - 43120 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166030 4/3012014 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166032 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166033 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 401 - 43112 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166034 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166025 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166023 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 401 -43113 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0166035 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166036 4130/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166024 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -300 Professional Srvs MSA SYSTEM UPDATE SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 2010 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJECT ENGINEERING SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 2012 NORTH ISLAND STREET PROD. PW 12- 01 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW1201 UPDATE STREET & UTILITY MAPS ENGINEERING THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project 14-4 GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS THRU ARIL 11 2014 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PRO.. PW13- 01 ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW 1301 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW13- 06 ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW1306 WATER SYSTEM MODELING ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 STORMWATER UTILITY -SWPPP UPDATE ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 Invoice 0166027 4130/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23296 FRIEDRICHSON- FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD RD SKETCHPLAN REVIEW -ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014 Invoice 0166026 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Refer 5 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166031 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 401- 43114 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0166038 4/3012014 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166037 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166039 4/30/2014 05/22114 11:07 AM Page 1 $1,567.50 $290.00 $98.00 $196.00 $5,133.50 $4,003.00 $18,428.00 $1,634.50 $1,197.75 $89.00 $72.50 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32,709.75 GIS UPDATES ENG SVC THRU APRIL 112014 $110.00 2014 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PRO.. PW14- $44,903.00 01 ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW1401 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROV 2014 PROJ $5,352.50 PW14 -04 ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW1404 2014 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 14 -03 $9,497.30 ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project P W 1403 -1011- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166040 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 427 - 43121 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0166041 4/3012014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166042 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT 427 SEAL COAT FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 05/22/14 11:07 AM Page 2 2014 BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN $2,825.00 REPLACE PROD PW 14 -08 ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014 Pr oject PW1408 2014 CRACK & SEALCOAT IMPROV PROJ. $101.50 PW 14 -06 ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW1406 2015 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW15 -03 $1,385.50 ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW 1503 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64,174.80 10100 Wells Fargo $4,185.50 $63,527.00 $1,567.50 $101.50 $4,022.75 $17,748.80 $5,731.50 $96,884.55 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $96,884.55 Total $96,884.55 -1012- -1013- .__...` CITY OF MOUND 05/22/14 1:51 PM — .— . Page 1 Payments CITY OFMOUND Current Period: May 2014 Batch Name 052714CITY User Dollar Amt $96,098.15 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $96,098.15 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 3D SPECIALTIES - Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 48 YELLOW T- SHIRTS W/ MOUND LOGO ON $1,123.67 POCKETS Invoice 445197 5/7/2014 Project 14 -5 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,123.67 Refer 2 ALLIED GENERATORS _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs GENERATOR REPAIR LABOR $210.00 Invoice 5634 5/6/2014 Project 14 -5 Transaction Date 5/1912014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $210.00 Refer 3 ALPHA RUG AND CARPET CLEANI _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -460 Janitorial Services CARPET CLEANING- PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG- $350.00 SQUAD ROOM, EXERCISE, ROOM, LOWER LEVEL, ALL HALLS Invoice 2864 5/12/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $350.00 Refer 4 AMSAN _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -460 Janitorial Services CREDIT PREV ORDER FD -$6.91 Invoice 310418033 5/5/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -460 Janitorial Services 10 PERMANENT USE FLOOR MATS- CITY $3,660.00 HALL ENTRY AREAS Invoice 310418033 5/5/2014 Transaction Date 5/1912014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,653.09 Refer 43 ANCOMCOMMUNICATIONS� Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -325 Pagers -Fire Dept. MINITOR V PROGRAMMING KIT $236.00 Invoice 45005 5/2/2014 PO 24290 Transaction Date 5122/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $236.00 .., ,.�.. .., Refer ...� ....... ... .. ....... ... 5 APACHE GROUP _ Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -220 Repair /Maint Supply C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE, CUPS $457.01 Invoice 172651 5/1212014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE, CUPS $457.01 Invoice 172651 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CREDIT- RETURN C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET - $403.86 TISSUE Invoice 172651 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CREDIT - RETURN C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET - 5403.86 TISSUE Invoice 172651 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -220 Repair /Maint Supply C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE $404.04 Invoice 172742 5/15/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE $404.04 Invoice 172742 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 1­1 ,,.,.„,, Wells Fargo 10100 Total I, $914.38 ., ... 1 111,11, . -_, ,,,.w ..... 1 . ,. Refer 53 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY n, -...w .- I - l ­_ I'll - I I . - 11 , . „. ­11 1 1 ,,.. -1013- CiTY OF [40UND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 05/22/14 1:51 PM Page 2 Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maintenance SERVICE GLEN ELYN LIFT STATION 5-7-14 - $358.90 ATS POWER FAILURE-CHANGED INPUT CONTACT Invoice 276e0 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 1 11 Wells Fargo 10100 Total "1 1.1111, 111,1 111-11111 1 -111, 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 11 -1 11 1-11 1-1-1111-1. Refer ,1111 .. 1111­11.11 -1 ­ "I'll, , 6 BAILEY NURSERIES, INC. .....,,.».,., -.,a, 11 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material 35 TREES FOR STREETSCAPE & PARKS Invoice 0372097 5/13/2014 PO 24357 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 7 BERGQUIST, RODGER Cash Payment R 601-49400-37144 Sales of Meters & Rea DEDUCT METER REFUND- 2645 HALSTEAD LANE Invoice 05272014 5/16/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer 8 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 101-41930-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1170734 5/3/2014 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1172735 5/14/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer — 10 _CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPAN Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials Invoice 1352010 5/7/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer u 9 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 101-41930-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 4/2112014 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 412112014 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 4/2112014 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 4121/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 4/21/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer 55 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials Invoice 140515 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Refer 38 DAHM, DOUGLAS Wells Fargo 10100 COFFEE MACHINE EQUIP LEASE- MAY JUNE, JULY 2014 CITY HALL COFFEE & CREAMER FIRE DEPT Wells Fargo 10100 TWO 5 GAL CURE & SEAL Wells Fargo 10100 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 Total Total $358,90 $901.30 $901.30 $125.00 $125.00 $45.00 $120.00 $165,00 $218.15 Total $218.15 $681.16 $681.16 $680.59 $866.52 $1,461.10 Project 14-3 $312.48 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 DEPOT BLDG $187.93 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,870.94 DURA DRIVE HOTMIX 23.13 TONS $1,259.42 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,259.42 g1 m CITY OF MOUND 05/22/141:51 PM ----- - Page 3 Payments e tTY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -37144 Sales of Meters & Rea DEDUCT METER REFUND- 5108 $275.00 EDGEWATER- D. DAHM Invoice 05272014 5/19/2014 Transaction Date 5/2112014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $275.00 Refer 44 DOCK MASTERS OF LAKE MTKA, I _ Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL MULTIPLE DOCK SLIPS $6,356.00 Invoice 202558 5/20/2014 Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -220 Repair /Maint Supply NEW & USED MUD PLATES- HIGHLAND & $162.50 TWIN PARKS Invoice 202559 5120/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,518.50 Refer 11 DURKIN, DAVID _ Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL/REPAIR TIMBER RETAINING WALL- $3,500.00 2063 COMMERCE BLVD- INSURANCE RECVD Invoice 05272014 5/1512014 Transaction Date 5/1912014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,500.00 Refer 12 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Cash Payment E475-46386-300 Professional Srvs TIF 1 -3 CONSULTING & ADVISORY SVCS- $1,998.75 APRIL 2014 Invoice 348185 5/12/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,998.75 Refer EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC.__ _ _45 Cash Payment E 101- 42115 -329 Sirens /Phone Linesl 3 EMERGENCY SIRENS- 6 MO MTCE FEE- $753.12 JULY 1 THRU DEC 31 2014 Invoice 33482 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $753.12 Refer 46 EMERGENCY APPARA TUS MAINT _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair FLEX DRAW LATCH FOR HALE CHIEF 2 $28.95 FLOTO PUMP Invoice 74240 5/8/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $28.95 Refer 54 EMERYS TREE SERVICE, INCORP _ Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -533 Tree Removal REMOVE TREES ALONG ACCESS RD 5 -14 -14 $1,945.00 Invoice 19224 5/19/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,945.00 Refer 41 FINANCEAND COMMERCE _ Cash Payment E 401- 43114 -351 Legal Notices Publishing ADV FOR BIDS 2014 STREET IMPROV PROJ $189.59 PW 14 -01 Invoice 741586685 511912014 Project PW1401 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $189.59 Refer 47 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES I _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic COAT ADVANCE CLEANING & $109.95 INSPECTIONS- HENTGES & STEVENS- LION TOTAL CARE Invoice 8341 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $109.95 Refer 42 FRED HOLASEK & SON, INC _ -1015- 43 T `t` OF 1,11OUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 05/22/14 1:51 PM Page 4 Cash Payment G 101 -22808 Adopt A Green Space FLOWERS - PLANTS FOR DEPOT & $310.00 SURFSIDE PARK- JAYCEES ADOPT A GREEN SPACE Invoice 00016332 5/17/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Refer 14 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006289994 5/5/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006289994 5/5/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006289994 5/5/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006289994 5/5/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006221716 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006221716 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006221716 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006221716 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006301231 5/1212014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006301231 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006301231 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006301231 5/12/2014 Transaction Date 5/1912014 Refer 13 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006301233 5/1212014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006221717 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006221717 3/2412014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006221709 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006301226 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006312581 5/1912014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006301234 5112/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006301234 5/12/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $310.00 UNIFORM SVC 5 -05 -14 $25.21 UNIFORM SVC 5 -05 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 5 -05 -14 $36.84 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -05 -14 $139.51 Project 14 -3 $42.53 UNIFORM SVC 3 -24 -14 $25.21 UNIFORM SVC 3 -24 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 3 -24 -14 $36.84 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -24 -14 $408.58 Project 14 -3 UNIFORM SVC 5 -12 -14 $25.21 UNIFORM SVC 5 -12 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 5 -12 -14 $36.84 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -12 -14 $182.94 Project 14 -3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $994.13 MAT SVC 5 -12 -14 CITY HALL $58.94 UNIFORM SVC 3 -24 -14 PARKS $42.53 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -24 -14 PARKS $65.27 MAT SVC 5 -12 -14 LIQUOR STOREMAT SVC $69.98 & SUPPLIES 3 -24 -14 HWS MAT SVC 5 -12 -14 LIQUOR STORE $69.98 MAT SVC 5 -19 -14 LIQUOR STORE $69.98 SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -12 -14 PARKS $75.11 UNIFORM SVC 5 -12 -14 PARKS $52.11 -1016- CITY OF MOUND Payments Cr ,TY OF MOUND 05/22/14 1:51 PM Page 5 Current Period: May 2014 Transaction Date 511912014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $503.90 Refer 15 GUSTAFSON, BRUCE Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 05272014 5/12/2014 Transaction Date 5119/2014 m Refer 16 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice C351205 5/2/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice C337901 4/30/2014 P024356 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 18 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO _Refer Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -418 Other Rentals Invoice 1000045230 511/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -418 Other Rentals Invoice 1000045162 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer 17 HERREID & ASSOCIATES Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 1002 5112/2014 2014 BOOT ALLOWANCE REIMB- B. $150.00 GUSTAFSON Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.00 GPS COMMAND LINK- SENSUS METERING $7.92 SYSTEM 4 HYDRATFINDER FLAG MARKERS, SOCKET $103.40 DRIVER, QUIK CAP Wells Fargo 10100 Total $111.32 PIN RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE - $127.20 APRIL 2014 Project 14 -3 FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE & $790.26 ADMINISTRATION FEE - APRIL 2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $917.46 LABOR RELATIONS SVC- PUBLIC $905.00 WORKS /PARKS FEB & MARCH 2014 Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -300 Professional Srvs LABOR RELATIONS SVC -CITY HALL APRIL & $3,077.26 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 519/2014 MAY 2014 Invoice 1002 5/12/2014 $269.75 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,982.26 Refer 19 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I _ 2201 CENTERVIEW LN SUBDV PLANNING Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -300 Professional Srvs MISC PLANNING SVCS APRIL 2014 $1,542.17 Invoice 007- 001 -72 5/9/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23297 JESBERG -1728 FINCH LN -P 1728 FINCH LN VARIANCE PLANNING SVCS Cash Payment G 101 -23296 FRIEDRICHSON- FAIRFIELD 5913 FAIRFIELD RD SUBD PLANNING SVCS $41.50 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 5/9/2014 APRIL 2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 519/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23298 BENCHMARK -2308 DRIFTW 2308 DRIFTWOOD EXPAN PLANNING SVCS $166.00 APRIL 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 519/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23299 PELLETT -6260 BIRCH LN 1 6260 BIRCH LANE VARIANCE PLANNING $269.75 SVCS APRIL 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 51912014 Cash Payment G 101 -23300 KING2201 CENTERVIEW C 2201 CENTERVIEW LN SUBDV PLANNING $62.25 SVCS APRIL 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 5/9/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23297 JESBERG -1728 FINCH LN -P 1728 FINCH LN VARIANCE PLANNING SVCS $166.00 APRIL 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 5/9/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total , $2,247.67 _ . _ Refer 20 HOME DEPOT /GECF (PiWj _ 1017- CMY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 05122/14 1*51 PM Page 6 Cash Payment E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies .COM COMPRESSOR- SIGN SHOP $99.97 Invoice 1086103 4/18/2014 Project 14-3 Transaction Date 5/21/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.97 Refer 21 INFRATECH Cash Payment Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic VAC DEBRIS- WATER TOWER CLEANING 4- $2,350.00 BEACHWOOD RD 24-14 5/16/2014 Invoice 140253 4124/2014 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic JET VAC CLEANING 4-30-14 $822.50 Invoice 140261 4/3012014 Transaction Date 5/21/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,172,50 Refer 22 JENKS, GUY Cash Payment R 601-49400-37144 Sales of Meters & Rea DEDUCT METER REFUND -6120 $125.00 BEACHWOOD RD Invoice 05272014 5/16/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $125.00 Refer 23 JESSENPRESS INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41110-350 Printing PRINT, MAIL-CITY CONTACT NEWS 8 PG $1,400.00 MAY-JUNE-JULY 2014 6,000 COPIES Invoice 42116 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,400.00 Refer 48 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional SNs HRA LEGAL SVCS- DEVELOPER DAY MTGS, $224,00 ASSISTED LIVING PROPOSAL- APRIL 2014 Invoice 120112 5/2012014 Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional Sws 2014 TIF 1-3 SPECIAL LEGISLATION -LEGAL $42.00 SVCS APRIL 2014 Invoice 120112 5/20/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $266.00 Refer 56 LAKE RESTORATION, INC. Cash Payment E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic SHORELINE DR POND TREATMENT #1- $216.00 DUCKWEED, SUBMERGED WEEDS & ALGAE Invoice 112179 4/29/2014 Transaction Date 512212014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $216.00 Refer 24 LIBERTY TITLE INC. -ELK RIVER Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT-4431 $358.65 DENBIGH D. NELSON Invoice 05272014 5/1512014 Transaction Date 5/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $358.65 Refer 25 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - COLOR $75.89 OVERAGE - 4/14/14 TO 5113/14 Invoice 1747136 5/512014 Cash Payment E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - BNV $189.11 OVERAGE - 4/14/14 TO 5/13/14 Invoice 1747136 5/5/2014 Transaction Date 2/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ......... $265.00 Refer 49 MAAS, JASON . -1018- CITY OF MOUND 05/22/14 1:51 PM - ` -�� Page 7 Payments MY OF i40UND Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies DUTY UNIFORM SHOES- REIMB J. MAAS $38.24 Invoice 05272014 5/21/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $38.24 Refer 26 MEDIACOM Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 5 -16 -14 THRU 6- $85.90 15 -14 Invoice 05272014 5/612014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CHARGE $0.57 Invoice 05272014 5/6/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $86.47 Refer 39 MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTYMANA _ Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL- CITY MGR K. $138.00 HANSON- CITY MGMT ASSOC Invoice 05272014 5121/2014 Transaction Date 5/21/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $138.00 Refer 27 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH _ _ Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -37170 State fee - Water 2ND QTR 2014 COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY $5,793.00 SVC CONNECTION FEE Invoice 05272014 5/8/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,793.00 Refer 57 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS COMPA _ Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials CSS- IH ASPHALT EMULSION $262.00 Invoice 70465 5/13/2014 Transaction Date 5/21/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $262.00 Refer 28 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA TIO _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib MAY 2014 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION $12,250.00 CONTRIBUTION Invoice 05272014 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 5/2012014 Wells Fargo 10100 _Refer 29 NS/1 MECHANICAL CONTRACTING, _ Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic PREVENTIVE MTCE AGREEMENT MAY THRU AUG 2014 CENT BLDG Invoice C003296 518/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 I'll, 1 .11 ­11-1 11111, 1-1111-11, 11 1. - - - � Refer 37 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -200 Office Supplies COPY PAPER, COLOR INK, 9V ALK BATTERIES- FD Invoice 710243782001 4/23/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Refer 36 OFFICEDEPOT Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 710243782001 4/23/2014 PO 23451 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Refer 30 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS Cash Payment E 60249450 -322 Postage Invoice 140439 5/11/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 2 ERGONOMIC OFFICE CHAIRS- HWS Wells Fargo 10100 APRIL 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE -1019- Total $12,250.00 $1,228.00 Total $1,228.00 $104.21 Total $104.21 $439.98 Total $439.98 $325.97 CITY OF MOUND Payments CffY OF MOUND 05/22/14 1:51 PM Page 8 Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute APRIL 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,804.47 PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 140439 5/11/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute APRIL 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,804.47 PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 140439 5/1112014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -322 Postage Invoice 140439 5/11/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer 31 PREMIUM WATERS, INC Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 603679 -04 -14 4/30/2014 APRIL 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $325.97 Wells Fargo 10100 5- 5 GAL WATER HOT & COLD WATER COOLER- CITY MGR Total $4,260.88 $39.74 Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -440 Other Contractual Servic MAY THRU JULY 2014 HOT & COLD WATER $68.85 Cash Payment COOLER- SQUAD ROOM ADV FOR BIDS 2014 STREET IMPROV PROD - Invoice 614850 -04 -14 4/30/2014 LEGAL NTCE 5 -17 -14 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -210 Operating Supplies PUB WKS HOT & COLD WATER COOLER $68.85 Transaction Date 5/2012014 RENTAL MAY THRU JULY 2014 Refer Invoice 614851 -04 -14 4/3012014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -210 Operating Supplies CITY HALL HOT & COLD WATER COOLER $68.85 RENTAL MAY THRU JULY 2014 Invoice 05272014 Invoice 614850 -04 -14 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 512012014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -210 Operating Supplies CENT BLDG HOT & COLD WATER COOLER $68.85 RENTAL MAY THRU JULY 2014 E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 604558 -04 -14 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 >N- Wells Fargo 10100 Total - w.-,n. , 11 , , ,., , $315.14 „. ..,. - .. —., , ... -.a,b — .... , - -. 32 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY -e- -"',- ',,, _Refer Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE 5 -3 -14- STORMWATER $42.41 POLLUTION PREVENT MTG Invoice 98272 51312014 Cash Payment E 401- 43114 -351 Legal Notices Publishing ADV FOR BIDS 2014 STREET IMPROV PROD - LEGAL NTCE 5 -17 -14 Invoice 102603 5/1712014 Project PW1401 Transaction Date 5/2012014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 33 SWARTZER, BRIAN _ Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms REPAIR CHAIN SAW CHAPS- SEW LIKE NEW -REIMB B. SWARTZER Invoice 05272014 5/12/2014 Transaction Date 512012014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 34 SWEEPER SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts SIDE BOOM RETAINER- STREET SWEEPER Invoice 14066 5/8/2014 Transaction Date 5/2012014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 50 TRI TECH DISPENSING _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair WIRE IN COMPRESSOR STARTER KIT Invoice 49282 51712014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 59 UHL COMPANY _ -1020- Total Total $139.44 $181.85 $18.67 $18.67 $175.68 $175.68 $278.00 $278.00 CITY OF MOUND 05/22/141:51 PM "- Page 9 \ Payments »!TY CIF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260402 Building Maintenance REPAIR MOTOR ROOFTOP UNIT, REPAIR $349.12 WATER HEATER SWITCH, REPLACE THERMOSTAT NORTH ENTRY HEATER, REPLACE DPST RELAY WEST ENTRY HTR Invoice 26999 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance REPAIR MOTOR ROOFTOP UNIT, REPAIR $3,142.03 WATER HEATER SWITCH, REPLACE THERMOSTAT NORTH ENTRY HEATER, REPLACE DPST RELAY WEST ENTRY HTR Invoice 26999 5/1412014 Transaction Date 5/21/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 51 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies 28 FIRE DEPT SHIELD BADGES Invoice 205216 5/13/2014 PO 24400 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 52 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE _ Cash Payment E 60949750 -210 Operating Supplies TWINE GREEN 9000- HWS Invoice 21 -19980 4/2/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Refer 36 VERIZON WIRELESS Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9724998484 5/10/2014 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9724998484 5/1012014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9724998484 5/10/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,491.15 $1,718.00 Total $1,718,00 $41.75 Total $41,75 DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 5 -11 -14 THRU 6 -10 -2014 DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 5 -11 -14 THRU 6 -10 -2014 DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 5 -11 -14 THRU 6 -10 -2014 DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 5 -11 -14 THRU 6 -10 -2014 Invoice 9724998484 5/10/2014 Transaction Date 5120/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 58 VESSCO, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic WELL HOUSE CHLORINE SYSTEM WORK 5- 14-14 Invoice 60250 511512014 Transaction Date 5/21/2014 Refer 35 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 519892093 515/2014 Transaction Date 512012014 Refer 40 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 $46.68 $46.68 $46.68 $140.04 $280.08 $105.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $105.00 5341 MAYWOOD RD STREET LIGHTS -4 -3 TO 5 -2 -14 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 DEPOT BLDG -1021- $5,053.03 $5,053.03 $102.45 $51.16 CITY OF MOUND 05/22/14 1:51 PM -- �'-� Page 10 Payments CITY OF NIOUN Current Period: May 2014 Fund Summary Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27114 TO 4127/14 $3,792.34 Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 $39,170.37 222 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 $1,677.03 Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 $6,518.50 285 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 $2,500.56 Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 $329.03 475 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27114 TO 4127/14 $1,475.52 Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 $14,820.10 602 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 $1,360.58 Invoice 412322323 5/1312014 $2,479.67 675 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4127/14 $1,360.58 Invoice 412322323 5/1312014 $96,098.15 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27114 TO 4/27/14 $852.32 Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 285 -46388 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 $1,798.45 Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27114 $43.46 Invoice 412322323 5/1312014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15,014.45 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERALFUND $39,170.37 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $18,198.17 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $6,518.50 285 MOUND HRA $1,798.45 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $329.03 475 TIF 1 -3 Mound Harbor Renaissan $2,264.75 601 WATER FUND $14,820.10 602 SEWER FUND $10,260.70 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $2,479.67 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $258.41 $96,098.15 Pre- Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $96,098.15 Total $96,098.15 -1022- CITY OF MOUND 05/22/1410: 43 AM - _- Page 1 Payments CITY OF NWUND Current Period: May 2014 Batch Name 052714HWS User Dollar Amt $79,329.84 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $79,329.84 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $229.50 Invoice 437412904 519/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 437412904 5/9/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $230.50 Refer 2 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS, SUPPLIES $62.40 Invoice 90173300 5114/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $66.50 Invoice 90173300 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $82.99 Invoice 90194800 5119/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $89.85 Invoice 43027300 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,503.70 Invoice 43027300 5/1412014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6,733.44 Invoice 43090400 5/19/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $68.20 Invoice 43027300 5/14/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,607.08 Refer 3 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN V Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $72.70 Invoice 132377 5/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $710.05 Invoice 132378 5/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $185.60 Invoice 135787 5/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale BEER $775.22 Invoice 135788 5121/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,743.57 Refer 4 BLUSKYPUBLISHING _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising 1/4 PAGE AD MAY 14 WEST LAKE BUSINESS $140.00 PUBLICATION Invoice 15971 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $140.00 Refer 5 COCA COLA BOTTLING- MIDWEST _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $217.92 Invoice 0168052709 5/8/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $217.92 Refer 6_DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $425.00 Invoice 68298 5/19/2014 -1023- CITY OF MOUND 05/22/1410:43 AM Page 2 J~ \ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,572.35 Invoice 2213493 $333.76 Invoice 19993 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $548.55 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo � — - 10100 - Total -. 11 $758.76 11 -� Refer 7 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY___ - - 1 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,009.95 $82.90 Invoice 751749 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $10.75 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment $841.50 Invoice 751750 5/13/2014 Invoice 617578 5/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Total - $2116 Refer 12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR $52.60 Invoice 752803 5/20/2014 -1024- Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,67105 Invoice 752804 5/20/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $80.00 Invoice 752465 5/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $80.00 Invoice 000358 5/16/2014 Transaction Date 5120/2014 .... Wells Fargo ....., 10100 ...w- Total ....� $3,810.05 e....._ .�,_.. Refer ,. , 1111111"­­ . _.w .. . . ..... .......... 8 EXCELSIOR BREWING COMPANY . ,..—, _ � ,. Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $126.00 Invoice 3683 5/6/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo - -- 10100 Total $126.00 Refer 9 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $612.00 Invoice 166880 5115/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $9.00 Invoice 166880 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $621.00 Refer 10 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $321.25 Invoice 702154 5/14/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $321.25 Refer 11 JJ TAYLOR, DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,572.35 Invoice 2213493 511312014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $548.55 Invoice 2213532 5/20/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,889.05 Invoice 2213533 5/20/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,009.95 Refer -,. 13 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $10.75 Invoice 617577 5/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $12.41 Invoice 617578 5/2/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total - $2116 Refer 12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ -- -1024- CITY OF MOUND 05/22/1410:43 AM Page 3 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX WINE $33.99 Invoice 1850100 5/14/2014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1161576 $1,617.34 Invoice 1850098 5/14/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,666.20 Invoice 1850099 5/14/2014 $366.00 Invoice 822193 5/9/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,317.53 Refer 15 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Invoice 822295 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE BEER $774.38 Invoice 8449330 5/19/2014 Transaction Date Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $10.00 Invoice 8449330 5119/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $57.00 Invoice 8449343 5/19/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.25 Invoice 8449343 5119/2014 Transaction Date 5/2012014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $843.63 Refer 14 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $397.00 Invoice 8447862 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $0.00 Invoice 8447862 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $636.58 Invoice 8448197 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $12.50 Invoice 8448197 5/12/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,046.08 Refer 16 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,03915 Invoice 2604340 5/1412014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,580.30 Invoice 2604339 5/14/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,619.45 Refer, 17 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $528.50 Invoice 1161575 5/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,020.28 Invoice 1161576 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,548.78 Refer 19 TH ORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $366.00 Invoice 822193 5/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,643.00 Invoice 822295 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $228.00 Invoice 823579 5/16/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Farnn 10100 Total $4,237.00 i MY OF MOUND WAR WEN Pill WE Payments 05122/14 10:43 AM Page 4 Refer 22 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment Current Period: May 2014 WINE Invoice 360781 5/8/2014 Cash Payment Refer 18 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN_G_COMPAN _ Invoice 360781 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $181.22 Invoice 823606 5120/2014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $88.30 Invoice 823607 5/20/2014 E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $12,200.16 Invoice 823608 5/2012014 Invoice 361475 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/2012014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,469.68 Refer 20 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ ............... � _Refer Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $216.00 Invoice 0098137 5/8/2014 E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 503249 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 0098137 51812014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $207,92 Invoice 0098138 5/812014 BEER Invoice 1090227544 5/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0098138 51812014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $431.42 Refer 21 USA _ _ Cash Payment _WEBLEASE E 609 -49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY WEBSITE SVC- HWS 5 -15 -14 TO 6- $99.00 14 -14 Invoice 64980 5/1512014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.00 Refer 22 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 360781 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 360781 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 360940 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 360940 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 361475 5/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 361475 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo - 23 WINEMERCHANTS-�� ............... � _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 503248 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 503249 5/14/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo Refer 24 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1090227543 5/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1090227544 5/21/2014 -1026- $576.00 $8.40 $280.00 $8.25 $776.00 $11.55 10100 Total $1,660.20 $1,969.10 $23.00 10100 Total $1,992.10 $7,556.90 $246.00 CITY OF MOUND 05122/14 10:43 AM -'- Page 5 Payments M iOU �v ,.ti" r OF rat Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $43.00 Invoice 1090227545 5/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$8,80 Invoice RMA006271 5/2012014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $21.50 Invoice 1090223902 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,309.05 Invoice 1090223901 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $27.20 Invoice RMA004672 5/13/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,140.45 Refer 25 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,411.14 Invoice 1080179327 5/1512014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,027.22 Invoice 1080179326 5/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$6.00 Invoice 2080042457 5/1412014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - 5105.00 Invoice 2080040791 5/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $34.24 Invoice 1080179328 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,361.60 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $79,329.84 $79,329.84 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $79,329.84 Total $79,329.84 -1027- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 13, 2014 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, May 13, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Kelli Gillispie and Ray Salazar Members absent: None Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Fin Dir /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, County Assessor Kari Kamrath, County Assessor Rob Winge, Consultant Rita Trapp, Seth Anderson, Rachel Christensen, Lily Hames, Stephani Boyum, Paul Boyum, Cliff Simon, Curt Nelson, Jim Reuper, Josh Leddy, Jessica Rashleger, Kent Friedrichsen, Matthew Van Nelson, Jordan Korczak, Jeff Lundgren Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. 2. Pledae of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Mayor Mark Hanus with "Mayor for the Day" Proclamations MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to approve the following proclamations. All voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Proclamation naming Rachel Christensen as "Deputy Mayor for a Day' in the City of Mound, Minnesota. B. Proclamation naming Seth Anderson as "Deputy Mayor for a Day" in the City of Mound, Minnesota. C. Proclamation naming Lily Hames as "Deputy Mayor for a Day' in the City of Mound, Minnesota. 5. Consent agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $271,194.76. B. Approve minutes of the April 22, 2014 regular meeting. I Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014 C. Approve Fire Inspection Permit for Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church — "The Blast" on Saturday, May 17, 2014 with fees paid. D. Approve permit for Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for the Northwest Tonka Lions — WeCAN Fundraising Event on May 16, 2014 with fee paid. E. RESOLUTION NO.14 -33: RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR 1728 FINCH LANE, PID #13- 117 -24 -13 -0018. ORDINANCE NO. 05 -2014: ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO ELECTRIC AND GAS FRANCHISE FEES. G. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -34: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY. H. Cancel Special Meeting Workshop for the purpose of receiving a concept plan for assisted living facility by Trident Development scheduled for May 20, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. Set a Special Meeting Workshop for the purpose of receiving Developer Day Summary for June 17, 2014 at 6:30 p.m. 6. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. None were offered. 7. Kari Kamrath and Robert Winge, County Assessors, with 2014 Hennepin County Assessment and Board of Appeal and Equalization Report from May 7, 2014. Kari Kamrath, Senior Appraiser for Mound stated the 2014 open book meeting was held on May 7" and 6 residents attended. Kamrath stated property sales for the period October 2012 through September 2013 were analyzed to come up with the payable 2015 values. Kamrath relayed the following increases by property type: residential 15.8% on average, with some neighborhoods as high as 20 — 30 %, residential lakeshore 5.3 %, commercial and industrial 0.7 %, apartments 3 %, condominiums 17.9 %, townhomes 9.9 %, duplexes 16.9°/x, and zero lot lines 10 %. The overall gross value increase was 10.7 %. To date, the assessor's office has received 62 value notice calls and has completed 11 appointments. Kamrath stated if the property tax increased more than 12% and $100, it may qualify for a special property tax refund up to $1,000. The general property tax refund is income based. Both forms can be found on the Minnesota Department of Revenue website and should be included in the income tax filing for 2015. 8. Jim Reuper, Phelps Bay Captain for the Lake Minnetonka Association, requesting contributions for the treatment of Phelps Bay. Josh Leddy, project manager for the LMA, and Jim Reuper, Phelps Bay Captain, explained that the Phelps Bay treatment area will be expanded in 2014 to east Phelps Bay and they are requesting additional funding. Mayor Hanus stated that funding requests should be received in spring for the following budget year and that the City does not have excess funds. Leddy stated the LMA is requesting an additional $3,000 for east Phelps Bay. Leddy stated that a Lake Improvement District (LID) is in the process of being created for St. Alban's Bay. A LID establishes a Board of Directors comprised of bay residents, and a majority of the bay residents could determine what level of treatment/service they want and then the -1029- Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014 costs would be assessed to the properties on that bay. Discussion ensued and Leddy stated he would need to obtain more information on the subject from Rob Roy who is heading up that initiative. 9. Rita Trapp, Consultant with Hoisinqton- Koegler, Inc., requesting discussion on Rita Trapp stated the applicant has requested City Council review the sketch plan and that it is not required. This review does not require a public hearing, but Trapp noted neighbors are present in the audience and written comments received from them have been included for Council consideration. Trapp summarized the proposed subdivision and stated all lots meet the zoning requirements for R2, which is a minimum of 6,000 square feet. Trapp stated the Planning Commission did not identify any concerns in their review. Mayor asked if cul -de -sac is standard size and Trapp stated that the engineer and fire chief felt it was sufficient but that she will need to look at the code. Salazar asked whether or not the detached deck is on an unimproved road. Trapp said there is a 2 foot setback required for a detached deck from the side. Trapp said Staff needs to research if a permit was pulled at the time of deck construction. Trapp said vacating a right of way is somewhat problematic. Kent Friedrichsen, 5913 Fairfield Road, stated he is the applicant, resident, and a real estate broker. Friedrichsen responded to some of the concerns raised by the council and neighbors. Hanus stated he would make some preliminary general comments. First, he feels the Lot 3 explanation seemed to make sense and second, he does not have any serious issues with the concept being proposed. Salazar stated he did a site visit and found it odd new homes would be built behind existing homes. Hanus stated similar cul -de -sacs exist all over city. Friedrichsen stated that the new owner of 5921 Fairfield Road /Lot 4 was a first time homeowner and that Friedrichsen purposely moved the structure on lot 5 as far back as possible to minimize impacts. Friedrichsen went on to address other concerns noted by neighbors. Gillispie asked what the proposed timeline was for completing all of the structures. Friedrichsen stated all would be completed as soon as possible. Friedrichsen commented on the sizes of the proposed houses and lot sizes and stated both are similar to houses and lots in the area. Friedrichsen stated the trees taken out were dead and that all utilities will be underground. Hanson stated it is a benefit that the structures will be further back on the lot to allow for parking since there is no street parking. The street extension will be 24 feet wide which is the same as the existing width of Fairfield Road. Friedrichsen stated that he may move into one of the new houses and that he has lived in Mound for 18 years. The Mayor invited people in the audience forward if they would like to speak. Jordan Korczak, 5921 Fairfield Road /Lot 4, stated that he did have a realtor when he purchased the home and that this proposal was not known to him at the time of purchase. Hanus stated that everybody's property rights have to be considered. Matt Van Nelson, 2925 Meadow Lane, stated he owns the new house. Nelson stated he wanted to voice a concern about disruptions to the nice quiet community with three houses being built at once and that the applicant may not be fairly addressing the comments from -1030- Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014 neighbors. Nelson stated construction and traffic is a concern and will reduce the safety and privacy aspects that are currently enjoyed. Hanus stated that often comments received are not relevant to discussion and that it is rare that proposed changes are well received by area residents. Jeff Lundgren, 5924 Idlewood, is behind Lot 5, and is not happy to lose privacy in the rear of his lot. Friedrichsen stated that he has worked with planners with the goal of getting final plat approval at the same time as the preliminary plat to save money and be proactive. Friedrichsen stated the state requirement is 45 feet for the cul -de -sac. Smith stated she looked it up and that the Mound code is 50 feet. Hanus stated that since there is no parking on the street, he would be concerned that there would be adequate parking on the property. Smith stated that this is being treated as a three -lot major subdivision. Smith stated usually 3 lots is a minor subdivision but this is a major subdivision because of the public utility work involved. According to code, a major subdivision requires approval of a preliminary and final plat. A Public Hearing will be held for the approval of the preliminary plat at the Planning Commission and City Council levels including the required notifications. The final plat approval is just at the Council level. Smith said a development agreement will be executed with the plans and specs subject to review by the City Engineer, Public Works, Fire Department, and the City Planner. Smith stated a letter of credit will be required for the public improvements. Friedrichsen stated that funding is not a concern. 10. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk[Treasurer, requesting discussion /action Pausche summarized the information contained in the public packet and stated that the applications and Orono police department background reports had been provided separately to the Council as decision makers. Pausche stated the State relies on the local authority to do the background check and to determine if issuing the liquor license is in the public interest. Pausche stated the Conditional Use Permit for the premises was included in the packet and that is where conditions are typically contained. Mayor Hanus asked if additional conditions may be proposed. Manderschied stated that the Council can impose additional conditions. Hanus cautioned the Council when discussing the information in background information. Manderschied stated two laws apply, the data privacy act and open meeting law that does allow for discussing private data so long as it is relevant to the decision. Gesch asked if the CUP conditions have been met. Smith stated those items will be required before the resolution is released for recording and that progress is being made. Salazar asked the applicant how start-up costs would be covered. Hanus stated he, too, wondered about finances and then he came to the conclusion that he did not feel it was his place to require proof. Paul Boyum, applicant, stated he has made arrangements with the food vendors and the bank to cover start-up expenses. Salazar asked about hiring staff and Boyum stated some are in place. Salazar asked where the applicants are living Boyum stated Golden Valley. -1031- Mound City Council Minutes —May 13, 2014 Hanus proposed the following language be added as a clarification: 'This license will be subject to revocation or non - renewal if the City Council determines that this liquor establishment is a nuisance or requires an abnormal or undue burden on law enforcement or the community." Hanus said that although there are no automatic disqualifiers triggered per the Police Chief, he feels this additional language is still needed. Hanus asked how conditions on approval are incorporated into the license. Hanus relayed a potential scenario where this additional language might be needed. Manderschied stated that City Code Section 6.53 provides a specific process for suspension or revocation of a license and that she has concerns about the use of "abnormal' and "undue burden" in the proposed language because it can be tricky to prosecute, whereas public nuisance is defined. Gesch worried that the proposed language is not measurable. Hanus asked what in addition to State Statute could be used as an enforcement tool. Manderschied referred to the Public Nuisance Ordinance and also referred to State Statute regarding over serving or providing service to minors. Hanus asked to address the undue burden on law enforcement if that were to occur. Gillispie asked about the license renewal language and if that would address it. Manderschied stated State Statute and City Code states that the licensee is responsible for the conduct on the premises, specifically Section 6.52. Manderschied said she is not concerned about placing a condition, just the language that was proposed. Hanson stated that police reports and calls for service are considered during the renewal. Manderschied stated the City Council has broad discretion at issuance and during renewal and stated that a liquor license is a privilege and not a right. Manderschied stated that courts are likely to uphold any reasonable and non - arbitrary reason. Hanus asked Manderschied to confirm that the public nuisance laws are applicable. Manderschied stated that they are applicable if the activity was related to liquor and occurred on the premises. Hanus stated that although he is not sure what the exact plans are, it appears the applicant plans to try new things and he likes that. Wegscheid stated that he drove by and did a walk through and that Mr. Boyum has done a fabulous job with the building. Wegscheid stated he is comfortable with the codes in place and supports approval of the license. Salazar stated he has given this a lot of thought and has many questions. Salazar stated a liquor license is a great privilege, and even though he is pro business, he is concerned about public safety and welfare. Even though he has trepidations, he is feeling better after hearing the other Council Members. Salazar stated that he believes there is demand for this service and if it is properly maintained and delivered, it will be successful. Hanus stated that he recently asked the Orono School Resource Officer about police calls /activity at The Narrows in Navarre and he was surprised to hear that there was very little. Salazar asked about DUls and Hanus stated that this type of business comes with inherent risks and that he hopes that they control it well and avoid the need for a police presence. Discussion ensued about server training and Pausche stated that it is in the business plan and is typically required by the liquor liability insurance carrier. Hanson stated that the required 50/50 ratio for food and liquor receipts will help keep the balance. -1032- Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014 MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve an intoxicating on -sale liquor license and a Sunday liquor license for Stephani Boyum and Paul Boyum for Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 11. Pausche stated that there was gambling, including pull tabs and paddle wheel, at the former VFW and that the State of Minnesota requires a resolution by the Council to approve the permit. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Gillispie, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -35: RESOLUTION APPROVING PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING AT CATTAILS KITCHEN N COCKTAILS, LLC. Mound. Hanson stated issues arose last summer and that the Orono Police Department has asked for more enforceable language in the City Code. Hanson stated this proposed language is to address conducting of business on public lands, including up to 600 feet into the water, and also prohibits businesses from citing the address of City property as the business address in advertising. Hanson stated the intent is to keep these places primarily for the public enjoyment, although Staff will be working on language that allows the permitting of certain types of businesses that are deemed to be in the public interest. Gillispie asked how the farmers markets would be impacted and Hanson stated that the one that takes place on public land is permitted. Discussion ensued about how Staff will know when business is being conducted on public land and Hanson stated the City received many reports from the public last year as well as the police officers know to look for it. At 9:00 pm, the meeting was recessed to change the recording medium. The meeting was resumed at 9:05 pm. Wegscheid asked Hanson to describe the types of calls that were received and Hanson gave examples. Salazar said the Council needs to consider the liability issues on city property. Hanson stated that insurance is required as part of any permitting process. Gillispie asked about any signage issues and Hanson stated that it is primarily when they use their vehicles as advertising bulletin boards. Wegscheid asked what the repercussion is for violating the ordinance and Manderschied stated violators could be charged with a misdemeanor. The City, as owner, can authorize use through permits and /or rental agreements. Hanson gave the example of Tommy's Trolly in Excelsior. Discussion ensued about the use of "immediately' in the resolution with regards to the delivery of goods, products, and services and Manderschied stated she used it in order to address vendors who may be there with the City's authorization. Hanus stated when the Bay Rentals' CUP was approved last year the Council was specific that the rental needed to take place on their private property and that he would use public property only to launch the watercraft. -1033- Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014 Salazar asked what would prevent someone from conducting a business out of their garage and Hanus stated that is allowed subject to the exterior storage unit, signs, and other language in the code that would apply. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to adopt the following ordinance, as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 06- 2014 -: ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 50 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO PARKS AND RECREATION PROHIBITING PRIVATE BUSINESS ON PUBLIC LANDS OR WATERS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF MOUND. 13. At 9:25 p.m. Mayor Hanus announced that the Council would go into closed session for the purpose of performing the City Manager's performance evaluation. City Manager Hanson stated she wished to conduct her performance evaluation in a closed session. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to close the session for the purpose of conducting the City Manager performance review. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Hanus read the applicable State Statute language that allows the Council to close the meeting. Mayor Hanus reconvened the meeting at 11:28 pm. Mayor Hanus announced that the Council had completed the performance evaluation of the City Manager. 14. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager: Gesch thanked the owners of Carbone's for following through on their promise to provide alternative transportation for their patrons. Hanson announced that on Saturday, May 17, the Farmer's Market will open, and the Meals for Wheels and Our Lady of the Lake Blast fundraisers will take place. B. Minutes: Planning Commission — March 4, 2014 C. Reports: Mound Fire Department Fire Commission Meeting Agenda — May 7, 2014 Strathmore's Who's Who Honors Kandis Hanson D. Correspondence: Letter from Hennepin County on Community Development Block Grant program —April 18, 2014 Email from Chief Farniok on Successful Explorers Competition — May 1, 2014 Letter from Westonka Historical Society requesting volunteers Letter from Mediacom on channel lineup — May 1, 2104 Minnetrista /Mound Clean Up Day — May 10, 2014 Hennepin County Hazardous Waste Collection Events 15. Adiourn MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Salazar, to adjourn at 11:30 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1034- JATLIllid- MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park area. 10() '— u �r t PERMIT FEE: $300/DAY TO $600/DAY* 100— i 1 L�Q 1 [fib h ti j i CU DAMAGE DEPOSIT: $500 TO $1000/DAY* *Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements. Date(s) of Usei;U Used I tj 01jleir PI&(a Intended Use `Tb 0 it Je TO Y1 �GG( zg .7 -,;hp Expected Attendance com01Wt( Representative's Name j T w LI i-6)n Ceti. Telephone No. Beyttme: (& l7, qto - j2A(y Work: lG 52) 40J -5-D4 j E- Mail: . ([ f{ M e) M iV)tle4Nl Drivers License Number: ' �Lyt GLI- �- ��ii267 -S» e artmental Approval pt'-`erk Police Dept. 4,3D Speaa1 Gen+ `{/ryn w Cheer i 5+ Date of Single Dance License Year Annual Dance LICENSE # CITY OF MOUND 2415 WILSHIRE BLVD. MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC DANCE/LIVE MUSIC PERMIT APPLICATION EVENT: LOCATION OF DANCEILIVE MUSIC: W D iyy r- F f W TYPE OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC: L f TIME PERIOD OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC _,5a+yr -Aa y 7/7--((� , 1 .00 a•M �V h cwj (HOURS PERMITTED: Mon -Sat: 8pm- 12:30am- Sunday: pm- 11:30pm) CHAIRPERSON OR ,L APPLICANT: -1 i IM LI f n TITLE: eCeGuiIVP D(f o L M Il'4t"W611" ADDRESS: Hc5Tq V1(v� Aj(1 120" ADDRESS: �r�Cisl�� Wlr� 33� E -MAIL 1 (t'M . i i t& (V) M QU1 e h)1(io( , WL. Vnn.0 5 HOME PHONE #: / o _g, HOME PHONE #: 14 WORK PHONE #: NG7-) �AO I - �N3 WORK PHONE #: loll Date Applicant's Signature 1036- Department Approval/Denial (Submit memo if denied) Approved Denied Police Dept. Adm. Fire Dept. CITY OF MOUND��, 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS. Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up up of the park area. PERMIT FEE: $300 /DAY TO $600/DAY* (l . (J DAMAGE DEPOSIT: $500 TO $1000/DAY* F *Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements. Date(s) of Use e � - 1 Area to be Used C- ('J-t 1 { r Time Frame "ZOISM, Intended Use We I'a A Expected Attendance SC Organization Represei Address Telephone No. Home: ex- Work: lj G O yj— /,55q / Drivers License Number l / �GC�I �/ a ���1� �(X J 1 t 77 De artmental Approval 1tv Clerk 5q.1 Police Dept. -1037- Afinnescia �3.VTi6'ENf Ci NSTA7�1nE5WFtE5 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Region 3 Fisheries 1200 Warner Road, St Paul MN 55106 Phone: 651- 259 -5831 /Fax: 651- 772 -7974 PERMIT TO CONDUCT FISHING TOURNAMENT Permission is hereby granted to the individual and /or organization named below to conduct a fishing tournament under the provisions of this permit, pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes and Rules. Name of Tournament: Permit Number: Fishers of Men Minnesota Team Division 14- 314 -T24 Name of Permittee: Telephone Number (Include Area Code): Dave & Tammy Shade 612- 280 -1559 Address (No. & Street, RFD, Box No., City, State, Zip Code): Hennepin 130 Shasta Circle West Chanhassen, MN 55317 Public Access to be used (See #5 on reverse side.): Name of Sponsor (Organization, Firm or Individual): Public Access Fishers of Men National Tournament Trail Name of Waters: Acres: County: Division of Waters I.D. Number: Minnetonka 14,729 Hennepin 27 -0133 Public Access to be used (See #5 on reverse side.): Public Access Tournament Species: Largemouth & Smallmouth Bass Weigh -in Stations: Catch and Release Tournament: X Yes / _ No Centerview Park, Mound Estimated No. of Entrants: Boats: Beginning Date: Term Hating Date: 100 50 August 23, 2014 August 23, 2014 Daily Fishing Hours Entry Fee per Individual Estimated Total Prize Value 7:00 A.M. - 3:00 P.M. $150 $4,500 Additional Stipulations /Conditions: See Reverse Side. *The permittee shall submit a report on forms provided, to the Regional Fisheries Manager identified below, within 30 days after completion of the contest. Regional Ofce -Copy Distribution: • St. Paul Fisheries Office • Regional Fisheries Manager • Area Fisheries Supervisor • Area Trails & Waterways Supervisor I Area Conservation Officer Regional Fisheries Man.- er' Si nature Date DNR Region 3 Fisheries Manager 1200 Warner Road St Paul Mn 55106 -6793 ®. /pat'' Consulting Engineers & Surveyors " 7 k 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 ft Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 `�_� "'� www,bolton- menk.com May 20, 2014 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: Emergency Retaining Wall Replacement 5097 Three Points Boulevard Request Payment of Invoice Dear Ms. Hanson: Attached is the Invoice from Advanced Wall Structures, Inc. for the full replacement of the existing two - tiered limestone block wall that failed on or about April 281i. Quotes from four contractors were received on May 2 1d with the low quote being submitted by Advanced Wall Structures, Inc., Prior Lake, in the amount of $37,514.00. The new wall is a two- tiered modular block wall conforming to the City's standard type and color. The invoiced amount is based on the actual amount of modular block installed. In addition, the split rail fence, bid at $1,064.00 was not installed as part of this work. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $33,210.00 to Advanced Wall Structures, Inc. Sincerely, BOLTON & /M�� EDDNK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance -1039- 5650 Starview Lane Prior Lake, MN 55372 952 - 447 -7300 Cell 612-387-4767 Invoice Submitted To: City of Mound / Bolton -Menk 05/15/14 ATTN: Dan Faulkmer, P. E. danfa@bolton- menk.com Job Name: 5097 Three Points Job Location: Mound, MN RETAINING WALL 5097 Three Points: 1,176 SF Anchor Block Wall installed @ $17.50 PSF $26,460.00 Removal of old wall $ 6,750.00 No fence required $ .00 THANK YOU! TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $33,210.00 -1040- Executive Summary TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: May 20, 2014 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 14 -04 Front Yard Setback Variance Request REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant has requested a 9.5 foot front yard setback variance to facilitate the construction of a new home with attached garage. The property, which is currently vacant, is located at the intersection of Birch Lane, Red Oak Road, and Dutch Lare in the Mound Terrace Addition just south of Dutch Lake. The applicant is proposing an approximately 2,000 square foot, two-story home with three bedrooms and two bathrooms and an attached three car garage. With frontage on three streets, the applicant has requested that the frontage along Birch Lane be designated as the front. Staff is supportive of the designation of Birch Lane as the front of the lot. The designation will be similar to the other homes along Birch Lane further to the east. In addition, while Dutch Lane is the portion of the lot with the smallest frontage, the intersection of the three roadways in that location significantly limits the buildable area on that side of the lot and would make movement in and out of the lot challenging and potentialy unsafe. Mound City Code requires that lots which abut more than one street provide a front yard setback on each street. This provision imposes a 30 foot setback on the property on three sides. It is for this reason that the applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the setback requirement on one of the sides down to 20.5 feet. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their May6, 2014 meeting and recommended on a 5 -1 -1 vote for approval. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, Staff has prepared the attached resolution for your consideration. 12 -1041 -Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION APPROVING FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR 6260 BIRCH LANE PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -04 PID NO. 14- 117 -24 -32 -0040 WHEREAS, the applicant, Loren Pellett, has submitted a request for a variance to allow a 9.5 foot front yard setback variance to facilitate the construction of a new home with attached garage. The property, which is currently vacant, has an irregular shape and street frontage on three sides; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R -1 single- family residential. Section 129 -100 of the City Code contains the regulations for the R -1 district; and WHEREAS, Sec. 129 -100 (b) (2) (c) requires a minimum front setback of 30 feet; and WHEREAS, the property is located at the intersection of Birch Lane, Red Oak Road, and Dutch Lane in the Mound Terrace Addition. The applicant is proposing an approximately 2,000 square foot, two -story home with three bedrooms and two bathrooms and an attached three car garage; and WHEREAS, with frontage on three streets, the applicant has requested that the frontage along Birch Lane be designated as the front. According to Section 129 -2 of the City Code, the following is the definition of the front lot line: Lot line, front, means that boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public street. In the case of a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street or as otherwise designated by the Community Development Director based on the practical front yard of the property as determined by such factors as the existing or proposed building configuration of the property and taking into consideration the characteristics of the surrounding properties. If the dimensions of a corner lot are equal, the front line shall be designated by the owner and filed with the city. For purpose of this chapter, a lot shall have only one front setback. ; and WHEREAS, Section 129 -197 (e) of the Mound City Code requires that lots which abut more than one street shall provide the required front yards along every street; and 1042- WHEREAS, the following includes the proposed dimensions for the subject lot: ; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: Variance 9.5 feet (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; -1043- Required Proposed Lot Area 10, 000 sq. ft. 13,148 sq, ft. Lot Width 60 feet 180 feet Front Yard (Birch Lane) 30 feet 20.5 feet Rear Yard (Red Oak Road) 30 feet 30 feet Side Yard (Dutch Lane) 30 feet 85+ feet Side Yard (east) 10 feet 10 feet Hardcover (maximum 4091o) 5,259 sq. ft. 2,724 sq. ft. ; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: Variance 9.5 feet (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; -1043- (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report dated April 30, 2014 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its May 6, 2014 meeting; and WHEREAS, a majority of the Planning Commission voted to recommend Council approval of the variance, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its May 27, 2014 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. The property's irregular shape and frontage on three streets pose practical difficulties as 30 foot setbacks are required for each frontage located along a street. 3. The proposed front yard setback is still more than 20 feet and maintains a similar setback as adjacent properties. 4. The reduction in the proposed front yard setback reduces the amount of hardcover required for the site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance with the following conditions: 1. Hardcover for the site shall not exceed 40% as allowed by the R -1 Zoning District. 2. All structures shall be constructed so that the lowest floor is at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. -1044- 3. Building height of the new structure shall be less than 35 feet as required by City Code. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining sedimentation and erosion control on the site during construction and until such time as ground cover is fully established. Applicant will be responsible for all required permitting from the MCWD for the project, including but not limited to, procurement of an erosion control permit, as well as the City's standard conditions that are required for new construction projects. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 6. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the expansion permit application is approved. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 8. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 10. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 11. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. 12. Payment of all involved fees that are required with the building permit for new home construction on a vacant lot, including but not limited to, Trunk Water Area Charge, Trunk Sewer Area Charge, Water Connection Fee, Sewer Connection Fee and MCES SAC fee. Fees to be collected shall be the amounts in effect at the time the building permit is issued. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property: Lot 8, Block 7, "MOUND TERRACE" according to the record plat thereof Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of May 2014. Mark Hanus, Mayor -1045- MINUTE EXCERPTS MAY 6, 2014 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist & Pete Wiechert. Staff present: Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd); Art & Barb King (2964 Pelican Point Cir); Loren Pellet (5660 Sunnybrook Cir); Matt Van Nelson (2925 Meadow La); Grant Johnson (6347 Bay Ridge Rd) BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 14 -04 Variance 6260 Birch Lane Applicant: Loren Pellett Trapp introduced the front setback variance request. The lot is irregular in shape and currently vacant. A 2000 SF house is proposed and shown on the survey. Birch Lane is designated as front by request of the owner. Staff supports Birch' Lane as front because of safety issues on Dutch Lane and the character of the neighborhood. A front setback requirement of 30 feet is difficult so a 20.5 setback is being requested. The required 30 foot setback on the three frontages along streets is greater than similar properties in the area, limits backyard use and increases hardcover due to the longer driveway. The survey shows a deck but building plans do not. Staff is recommending approval with standard requirements and findings of fact. Retterath noted that the dimension off Birch Lane seems to be measured differently. Hennepin County shows a difference in the location of the front lot lines. Loren Pellet — 5660 Sunnybrook Cir —After the property was staked to the original drawing and you walked the property and saw how long the driveway and compared it to the currently proposed setback it's obvious how much better it was. it flows with the neighborhood much better and improves the hardcover. Discussion Retterath walked site; it's very open to west. He's struggling with the rationale of the difficulty of putting a house on this parcel. it would technically put this house closer to the curb than the adjacent house. He doesn't see a practical difficulty and will not support it. The deck could be put in a different place. Retterath stated that the applicant actually demonstrated that a house could be built on this property. The 30 foot setback it is buildable. It's not a practical difficulty. Trapp said that Staff felt 30' on 3 sides was excessive and more than what most properties have to deal with. Smieja asked why 30 feet for corner lot. Trapp said R1 front setback is 30 feet. This one is unusual because it's triangular with 3 fronts. Retterath still comes back to the city granting a practical difficulty case because the owner wants it a certain way. Trapp noted that the standard is practical difficulty. which means something reasonable cannot be done within the standard. Pellett disagrees that there is no difficulty. There's extreme difficulty. The area is mostly 20 -25 foot setbacks. The backyard is really close to street and quality of the project for the neighborhood is impacted. Smieja confirmed that if this was zoned R2 this wouldn't be a problem. Trapp agreed but noted the surrounding properties are R1A not R2. The R1A areas to the north have 20 foot fronts as well as much of the R1 homes to the east. Wegscheid supports the variance. Practical difficulty isn't a defined mathematical equation. It differs from person to person. MOTION by Wegscheid, second by Stone, to accept staff recommendation. MOTION carried. Voting for: Stone, Gawtry, Goode, Penner, and Wegscheid. Voting against: Retterath. Smieja abstained. -1047- nAAL y T • r TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director April 30, 2014 14 -04 Front Yard Setback Variance Loren Pellett on behalf of property owner Novak Fleck Inc. 6260 Birch Lane (PID NO. 14- 117 -24 -32 -0040) Low Density Residential R -1 Single Family Residential BACKGROUND The applicant has requested a 9.5 foot front yard setback variance to facilitate the construction of a new home with attached garage. The property, which is currently vacant, has an irregular shape and street frontage on three sides. SITE INFORMATION The property is located at the intersection of Birch Lane, Red Oak Road, and Dutch Lane in the Mound Terrace Addition. The property is located just south of Dutch Lake and will have views of the lake. The applicant is proposing an approximately 2,000 square foot, two -story home with three bedrooms and two bathrooms and an attached three car garage. With frontage on three streets, the applicant has requested that the frontage along Birch Lane be designated as the front. According to Section 129 -2 of the City Code, the following is the definition of the front lot line: Lot line, front, means that boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public street. In the case of a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street or as otherwise designated by the Community Development Director based on the practical front yard of the property as determined by such factors as the existing or proposed building configuration of the property and taking into consideration the characteristics of the surrounding properties. If the dimensions of a corner lot are equal, the front line 1M. 6260 Birch Lane Variance PC Report shall be designated by the owner and filed with the city. For purpose of this chapter, a lot shall have only one front setback. Staff is supportive of the designation of Birch Lane as the front of the lot. The designation will be similar to the other homes along Birch Lane further to the east. In addition, while Dutch Lane is the portion of the lot with the smallest frontage, the intersection of the three roadways in that location significantly limits the buildable area on that side of the lot and would make movement in and out of the lot challenging and potentially unsafe. Section 129 -197 (e) of the Mound City Code requires that lots which abut more than one street shall provide the required front yards along every street. The City Code has a provision which allows a reduction to setback requirements, based on lot width, for lots of record. However, given that this lot is more than 81 feet wide, the required lot setback along each street is still 30 feet. The following are the proposed dimensions for the application: 4 9 01 44 II&ME iGPf J REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. -1049 - May 1, 2014 Page 2 Required Proposed /Existing Variance Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft. 13,148 sq. ft. Lot Width 60 feet 180 feet Front Yard (Birch Lane) 30 feet 20.5 feet 9.5 feet Rear Yard (Red Oak Road) 30 feet 30 feet - Side Yard (Dutch Lane) 30 feet 85+ feet - Side Yard (east) 10 feet 10 feet - Hardcover (maximum 40 %) 5,259 sq. ft. 2,724 sq. ft. - REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. -1049 - May 1, 2014 Page 2 6260 Birch lane Variance PC Report (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS The variance application was submitted on April 1, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be April 2, 2014. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved departments, consultants and agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: Melissa Manderschied, I do not have any concerns with this application as it is a uniquely City Attorney shaped parcel. Staff to confirm with applicant that the application was signed by authorized signatory. Confirm assignment of 6260 Birch for subject property. Dan Faulkner, City If approved, significant erosion control measures should be Engineer required during home construction. Tom Dietrich Based on these preliminary plans, the property owner would be required to apply for an erosion control permit with the District. All information relevant to the permit application can be found online but if the applicant needs any help, please refer them to me. -1050 - May 1, 2014 Page 3 6260 Birch Lane Variance PC Report Correy Farniok, Orono No issues. Police Chief Scott Qualle, Building I have no comments. Official DISCUSSION • The applicant has provided an alternative survey that shows the placement of the home if all setbacks are met. As shown, this placement will limit the rear yard area and require a longer driveway. • As noted in the narrative, the angle of the street means that while the corner of the house is setback 20.5 from the closest point, the distance from the garage straight south to the street will be 26.5 feet. • Planning Commissioners are advised that the applicant narrative contains some errors in describing setback requirements for adjacent properties. The properties located to the north across Red Oak Lane, adjacent to Dutch Lake, have 20 foot front yard setbacks because they are zoned R -1A not because they are Lakeshore lots. The applicant also states that lots of records in the R -1 District are allowed a 20 foot setback. Section 129 -100 (3) does allow a front yard setback reduction for lots of record. The reduction is based on a lot's depth. Those that have a lot depth of less than 60 feet can be reduced to 20 feet, while those lots between 61 and 80 feet deep are allowed to be reduced to 24 feet. Properties with a lot depth of more than 81 feet must maintain the required 30 foot setback. Staff's determination is that this lot's depth is more than 81 feet and so 30 foot setbacks are required. • The applicant has proposed hardcover totaling 2,724 square feet, which is 22 %. This is well below the lot of record requirement of 40 %. • The survey shows a future conforming deck on the north elevation abutting Red Oak Road. It was not shown on the building plans however. • Section 113 -53 (b) (4) states that all structures shall be constructed so that the lowest floor elevation, including basement or crawl space, is at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. The RFPE for Dutch Lake is 942.0 feet. The lowest floor elevation shown for the proposed new house is shown at 968.9 feet. • According to the applicant, the proposed height of the home is just over 30 feet, which would meet the R -1 Zoning District maximum of 35 feet. Staff is verifying the calculations provided and will ensure the height meets zoning code requirements during the building permit process. • Per code, minimum allowed driveway width is 10 feet; maximum is 24 feet. Side setbacks of 1 feet are required. Driveways are required to be hard surfaced. -1051 - May 1, 2014 Page 4 6260 Birch Lane Variance PC Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION In accordance with City Code Sec. 129 -39 (a), Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a 9.5 foot front yard variance as requested by the applicant subject tc the following conditions: 1. Hardcover for the site shall not exceed 40% as allowed by the R -1 Zoning District, 2. All structures shall be constructed so that the lowest floor is at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. 3. Building height of the new structure shall be less than 35 feet as required by City Code. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining sedimentation and erosion control on the site during construction and until such time as ground cover is fully established. Applicant will be responsible all required permitting from MCWD for the project, including but not limited to, procurement of an erosion control permit, as well as the City's standard conditions that are required for new construction projects. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 6. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the expansion permit application is approved. 7. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 8. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 10. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 11. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. -1052- May 1, 2014 Page 5 6260 Birch Lane Variance PC Report 12, Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain and erosion control are in effect; also others. Applicant is advised that these rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as rules regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by th e Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. The applicant is requested to contact the MCWD regarding the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Any future building permit release will be conditioned upon the applicant providing receipt of the MCWD permit(s) issuance (as applicable) and /or receipt of written confirmation from the MCWD that no permit(s) is needed for the project. 13. Payment of all involved fees that are required with the building permit for new home construction on a vacant lot including but not limited to Trunk Water Area Charge, Trunk Water Area Charge, Water Connection Fee, Sewer Connection Fee and MCES SAC fee. Fees to be collected shall be the amounts in effect at the time the building permit is issued. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered. 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. The property's irregular shape and frontage on three streets pose practical difficulties as 30 foot setbacks are required for each frontage located along a street. 3. The proposed front yard setback is still more than 20 feet and maintains a similar setback as adjacent properties. 4. The reduction in the proposed front yard setback reduces the amount of hardcover required for the site. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it is anticipated that the variance request will be reviewed at an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time, possible dates are Tuesday, May 13, 2014 or Tuesday, May 27, 2014. 1053- May 1, 2014 Page 6 Planning Commission Date &t ?Y 6A ) 1V / Case No. -6L City Council Date f � 2A ae,7 91ST-Tlh -yo - 3o]Jwiiff ru•tU OTHER THAN OWNER) 1. Has an 'OZO 4 Name'4�reA Rojle -7L�- Email tn/ PhoneHome9S ` Y262 Work Q 5c!%L2/162 Fax a�2 - -�' ever been made for zoning, use permit, or for this property? Yes ( ) Noy). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Variance information (10/2112013) Page 4 of 6 -1054- j J Y Case N ®. 3. Do the existing structures comply wi h all a, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): 1 ? SETBACKS: i. q t' I'll C'F"r,/� REQUIRED REQUESTED (or existing) Front Yard: ( N (VE W ft. Side Yard: (N 4 W) f C-D ft. 10 ft. Side Yard: (N S E 3(2 ft. ft. Rear Yard: & E W) ft. ft. Lakeside: (N S E W) ft. ft. (NSEW) ft. ft. Street Frontage: �� ft. ft. VARIANCE ft ft ft 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? N too narrow ( ) too small f4 too shallow ( ) topography ( ) drainage (shape ( ) soil ( ) existing situation () other: specify Please describe: SAS FJ✓ Ty f/ci �` Variance Information (10/2112013) Page 5 of 6 -1055- SAS FJ✓ Ty f/ci �` Variance Information (10/2112013) Page 5 of 6 -1055- Case No. 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), NoA, ff yea, Wien: 7, Was the practical difficulty created by any other human-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes( ), No X), if yes, explain: f3. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in - this patttion? .Yes W), No( ). if no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? s. l certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be - submitted herewith are true and accurate, l acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premixes described in this application by any authorized Official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintainfag and removing such notices as-may be required by law. _ riOwner's Slonatur® A,apticert's ftnafur(&6 Vadanoe fntoenawn f 10,7111018) Page 6 of 6 -1056- Loren Pellett 5660 Sunnybrook Circle Mound, MN, 55364 03/31/2014 City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mound, MN, 55364 Dear Planning Commission and City Council. The reason for my variance is to build a quality house that fits into the neighborhood well. The house was staked and after being staked I noticed it is not in the optimal location. The house being moved forward would flow considerable better with the neighbors properties than it does under the setback regulations in the zoning district. Also moving forward would reduce approximately 300' of hardcover. The hardship for the lot is the shape of the lot. Birch lane comes at angle to the property. Using a 30' front yard setback puts the house at 37' from the road on left corner straight to the road and 58' from the road on right side of the house causing a longer driveway and using lots of hard cover on a small lot. Pulling the house forward to 20.5 would put the house at 26.5 straight to the road on the left side of the house and 47' to the road on the right side of the house. The next door neighbor's house to the left is 21' from the road. If the house where moved to a 20' setback it would line up better with their house. Also the houses across the street are Lake Properties so their setbacks are all at 20'. Moving the house forward provides abetter quality backyard and gives better spacing from houses across the street. The lot is not very deep so at 30' front yard setback there is only 30' rear yard. Moving the house forward there is 41.44 setback from the street in the year yard. The zoning district also allows 20' setbacks on lots of records. Corner lots 50-80 are allowed a 20' setback; Lots with 60' or less width are allowed a 20' setback. Lake Lots are allowed a 20' setback This lot has 163' of frontage but the lot depth for the majority of the lot would not have enough buildable space so the lot effectively is not wider than 80'. Attached is two surveys one with meeting all setbacks which will not allow for a rear deck. The other which is surveyed to the requested variance. It is obvious which one flows better in the neighborhood. Thank you for considering the Variance. Sincerely / Loren Pellett -1057- HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE O w a OWNER'S NAME: V0 / .� � l�� _ - Ci A LOT AREA -' � `% F SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ......... ............................... LOT AREA / f SQ- FT. x 40 °le = (for Lots of Record) _�__.._.. _«.__..._._. .—C� �� U " Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129 -385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE Ll L) x = I � C D TOTAL HOUSE ........................... ....................... !i i DETACHED BUILDINGS x (GARAGEtSHED) - x = TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................. DRIVEWAY, PARKING ., Ca x� = I C AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. x . j 4, X I , t- i1,(r�7 • 1t - r DECKS Open decks (114" min. ' " ` X / Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not x = counted as hardcover. x = TOTALDECK— .................................................... x = X TOTAL OTHER ..................... ............................... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ..................................... ............................... PREPARED Revised 1 /10 kLIPP P R 12074 Mii I I 0 0 0 u) N W O N _ r11 c s o o m a o 3 0 W O a m N i v m UI V Z J O ? ® O ❑ O O Q O d Z 05 0000 001 aup))so3 Y !1 W li Y Q rr�� rtr z F-a 4 W H WOz�M °nom a - Z Q 9 wB• d r o 0 O W FO- C9 J W w O m m m m rn P r It �i O W 04 0 a v p 4 v i0 m ti � o y m� o o m N O) W ° oll E N W N � x p O f 00 O O W W W O O 2 D fL ZZ Q Q Q m m" m anSo ^mb r/iV}7Om TDU - IUOy- N 4 DRIVE B ° hoN DOM +'ry off_,95'84 as � Ory 0 6R .BAZ O W „a. 5£. o Y � a O 1 c awm I •�' m" m anSo ^mb r/iV}7Om TDU - IUOy- 4 p � Ory 0 ET c Y � a O a c �a N East cc H-LAND SlJR E 1 I rG9 1 .A.© F.B. NO.NO Xxxx .6 - 1 rD Y LAND SURVEYORS ' 10" SCALE 1"= 30' 976.9 Proposed Top of Block 11947 Idaho Ave. N. ® Denotes Iron Monument Found 4}q TNH 139"N6'49' Champlin, Minnesota 55316 O Denotes Spikes Set W S E 976.5 Proposed Garage Floor PHONE (763) 323 -1300 ❑ Denotes Wood Hub Set 968 9 36" T FAX (763) 323 -7035 C For Excavation Only Proposed Lowest Floor hylandsurvey @qwestoffice.net x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation S Type of Building - �✓ur�P�l?r}� �pl'�jfjrtt�F = Denotes Proposed Elevation 963.430 FULL BASEMENT Sanitary MH -4- Denotes Surface Drainage Lookout 871.4 NOVAK FLECK Property Located In Part Of 963.43 RED OAK ROAD SW 1 A, Sec. 14Twp. 117 R. 24. saaimryMH Note: 12" of Snow on the Site wyD4.JD East cc NE Corner 149.9 of Lot 6 East 967.71 za' r .6 - 968.3fi - O 24",T' N) ' 10" CM O 12x12 .0 965.84 6 .06 nt ................ .................. 15.00 15.0° TNH 139"N6'49' _. X80 . i 968.86 CR= 971,18 966.4 966.47 36" T C w o 966.53 a Storm MH -. = 963.430 Sanitary MH 138.80 East cc NE Corner 149.9 of Lot 6 East 967.71 za' r 5��. - 968.3fi - O 24",T' N) 152.1 CM O 12x12 .0 DECK 1 97a.2'i 968.95 i 24° T ! ................ .................. 15.00 15.0° i X80 . i 2' Cant. c 19 T PROPOSED RESIDENCE 972,1 10.0 i Ca zo Note: Height of Building - 28' -4" - -- Note: Deck is impervious N O 0 - ° AREA: 13,148 Square Feet 114 �2 AREA OF HOUSE: 1,551 Square Feet a I o , AREA OF DRIVE: 819 Square Feet 974.48 `.��ry �� 974. 974.3 74.113 ,� 974.75 7 976 h r___ 976.5 .1- CJ 6� V� j GARAGE 90 I' m m a �T HOUSE TOB 1975.90 1975.57 .60 7.7 9]59 G PP r'T 9]5.48 975.21 LOT 8, BLOCK 7, "MOUND TERRACE" PP Overhead Wves Tp 562s in\ ll (O 976.62 h This survey is certified only to the above named person or persons and not to subsequent owners, mortgages or title insurers. \ The only easements shown are from plats of record of information provided by client. All building dimensions and floor elevations must be verified by client. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Surveyed by us this 20TH day of MARCH 20 14 Milton E. Hyland, Minn. Reg. No. 20262 Rev. March 24, 2014 Rev. March 27, 2014 Rev. April 24, 2014 ttev aprin au, zu1q Tc 967.24 697 Spike In Retaining 10 NE Corner 149.9 of Lot 6 East NE Corner of Lot 3 9 174 - _ -- East CM O J O w 0 0 971,18 36" T w o 972,1 10.0 i Ca zo Note: Height of Building - 28' -4" - -- Note: Deck is impervious N O 0 - ° AREA: 13,148 Square Feet 114 �2 AREA OF HOUSE: 1,551 Square Feet a I o , AREA OF DRIVE: 819 Square Feet 974.48 `.��ry �� 974. 974.3 74.113 ,� 974.75 7 976 h r___ 976.5 .1- CJ 6� V� j GARAGE 90 I' m m a �T HOUSE TOB 1975.90 1975.57 .60 7.7 9]59 G PP r'T 9]5.48 975.21 LOT 8, BLOCK 7, "MOUND TERRACE" PP Overhead Wves Tp 562s in\ ll (O 976.62 h This survey is certified only to the above named person or persons and not to subsequent owners, mortgages or title insurers. \ The only easements shown are from plats of record of information provided by client. All building dimensions and floor elevations must be verified by client. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Surveyed by us this 20TH day of MARCH 20 14 Milton E. Hyland, Minn. Reg. No. 20262 Rev. March 24, 2014 Rev. March 27, 2014 Rev. April 24, 2014 ttev aprin au, zu1q 976.9 Proposed Top of Block 976.5 proposed Garage Floor 968.9 Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building — FULL BASEMENT Walkout 96a4s RED OAK ROAD Sanitary MH Tc 965.84 LOT 8, BLOCK 7, "MOUND TERRACE" rvey is certified only to the above named person or persons t to subsequent owners, mortgages or title insurers. ly easements shown are from plats of record of Information provided by client. NOVAK FLECK TNH ® 10.00 968.66 " PjfD °4$39 .4 Denotes 47 O Tc Spikes S, Stam 0 Storm M03 Denotes Wood Hu S.nR<.ry MH LOT 8, BLOCK 7, "MOUND TERRACE" rvey is certified only to the above named person or persons t to subsequent owners, mortgages or title insurers. ly easements shown are from plats of record of Information provided by client. NOVAK FLECK __— NE comer 100,00 V NE Corner 149.9 of Lot 3 Eost of Lot 6 East e CM O Jy O n mJ p �N 0 i 1 974.75 ! t r < � HOUSE .. . Tors 975. ®a -. 975.21 \ v -1061- bL AI-t t Denotes Iron Mon O Denotes Spikes S, 0 Denotes Wood Hu For Excavation Or x000.0 Denotes Existing n Denotes Proposec Denotes Surface Property Located in Part 0 SW 1 Z4. Sec. 14 Twp. 11 Note: 12" of Snow on th __— NE comer 100,00 V NE Corner 149.9 of Lot 3 Eost of Lot 6 East e CM O Jy O n mJ p �N 0 i 1 974.75 ! t r < � HOUSE .. . Tors 975. ®a -. 975.21 \ v -1061- -1062- r -rte ffill r- ik 1 I7 31 0 1;.I.4�i1ill�i/ Ti r'YI I' JS e VV �GO1aG. °.d.,.a r TM coaa+eciloea i ®o Iow taro. rio. ` d FNIMAN -1063- 0 -1064- -1065- Executive Summary TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: May 20, 2014 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 14 -05 Minor Subdivision and Planning Case No. 14 -06 Variances REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant is proposing a 3 lot minor subdivision of the 20,265 square foot property at 2201 Centerview Lane. The property currently includes an existing single family home that is anticipated to remain after the subdivision. Variance approvals are being concurrently requested as the 6.9 foot side setback for the existing house on Parcel C becomes non - conforming when the setback changes from 6 feet for a lot of record to 10 feet for a non lot of record. A variance is also being requested to address the minimum lot depth requirement as it applies to Parcel A. Given the configuration of Parcel A, it is unable to meet the 80 foot lot depth requirement. Staff notes that at 7,706 square feet, the parcel exceeds the 6,000 square foot minimum size requirement. In addition, portions of the lot due meet the 80 foot lot depth. The applicant has demonstrated that a house and garage can be placed on the lotdespite given its shape. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW ANDRECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their May6, 2014 meeting and recommended unanimously for approval of the requests. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION City policy requires the payment of the Trunk Area Water Charge and Trunk Area Sewer Charge prior to release of the resolution for recording. However, on a case -by -case basis, the Council has approved an alternate schedule to allow for these fees to to be collected as part of the building permit, if requested. Members are advised that the applicant has requested payment of these fees with the future building permits. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approvalof the requests, Staff has prepared the attached resolutions for your consideration. 12.1066 -third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 RESOLUTION NO 14- RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR THE PROPERTY AT 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -05 PID # 13- 117 -24 -31 -0040 WHEREAS, the applicants, Art and Barb King, submitted a request for a minor subdivision to create three buildable parcels from the existing lots of record that make up the property at 2201 Centerview Lane; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R -2 (Single and Two Family Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of the City Code; and WHEREAS, the following table shows the minimum requirements for the R -2 District for a single - family lot and evaluation of the proposed new lots' conformity with the regulations: and WHEREAS, the proposed new lots meet the requirements of the R -2 District for a non - lot of record with the exception of the side setback for the existing house, which is currently 6.9 feet, and the minimum lot depth for Parcel A; and WHEREAS, the applicants submitted a variance request for these conditions; and -1067- WHEREAS, the 20,265 square foot property currently includes an existing single family home that was constructed in 1940 and fronts Centerview Lane. The property also has frontage on Noble Lane. The owners, who purchased the property in April 2013, indicated that the existing house would be retained on proposed Parcel C, if a subdivision was undertaken. The applicants also expressed interest in constructing a detached accessory structure on proposed Parcel C along with a future addition to connect the existing house with the proposed detached garage. Both the proposed detached garage and future addition are shown on the submitted subdivision survey and are shown in conforming locations; and WHEREAS, whenever a subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner, or authorized agent, shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance with the procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 121; and WHEREAS, the proposed lot arrangement qualifies as a minor subdivision as described in Sec. 121 -35 (1) of the City Code as it contains three or fewer residential lots and does not involve the construction of public facilities or public improvements; and WHEREAS, lots approved as part of a minor subdivision, including those with existing structures, are no longer eligible for "lot of record" status and are required to meet the same standards as new lots; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report dated April 30, 2014 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the minor subdivision application and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the minor subdivision application at its May 6, 2014 meeting and recommended approval with conditions; WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the minor subdivision request at its May 27, 2014 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the minor subdivision request, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The subject lots have frontage on improved public streets and municipal utilities are available. 3. The applicants have demonstrated that the proposed lot arrangement can accommodate the construction of new single - family homes with conforming setbacks and hardcover. I.S 4. The two, new proposed single- family residential lots will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on adjoining property. 5. The proposed new lots meet the standards for a non -lot of record with the exception of the existing side setback for the existing house, which is 6.9 feet and is not changing as a result of the subdivision. 6. Lot depth for Parcel A, as proposed, is reasonable as the City's definition is difficult to apply in this case due to its proposed shape /configuration. The lot size for proposed Parcel A is 7706 sq. ft. which exceeds the 6000 sq. ft. requirement. Portions of proposed Parcel A meet or exceed the 80 foot minimum lot depth requirement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound that the minor subdivision requested by the applicants is hereby approved with the following conditions: The variance application is approved. Driveways must be hard surfaced in accordance with City Code regulations. Minimum driveway width is 10 feet; maximum width is 24 feet. 3. Drainage shall not be directed to neighboring properties. 4. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction, including but not limited to, installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be the responsibility of the permit holder. 5. As part of the City's approval of the subdivision, the dedication of public drainage and utility easements, to be determined by the Public Works Director, will be required and shall be submitted in a form to allow for recording at Hennepin County, and shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City, prior to recording. Applicants shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. Applicants are advised that there are historic indian burial mounds and /or earthwork sites in and around the City of Mound. While many of the mounds have been severely impacted by development over the years, the mounds do, however, receive protection under state law; and penalties are imposed for unauthorized disturbance of mounds. The City maintains some general information about possible sites in an inventory of the "Earthwork/Mound /Burial Areas" contained on the Cultural Resources Map in the Mound Comprehensive Plan and in surveys of the burial sites from Hill and Lewis in 1911 but the completeness or accuracy of this information is unknown. Additional information may be obtained through the Minnesota State Archeologist. Any formal investigation of a site, including a determination of whether a mound or burial area exists on a subject site, is the responsibility of the property owner or developer. The issuance of permits by the City to do work on a site does not relieve the owner or the developer of that responsibility. 1069- 8. Payment of park dedication fees as required by Sec. 121 of the City Code prior to the release of the resolution for recording. The amount due is $1,100.00 for each of the two additional lots for a total of $2,200.00. 9, Payment of Trunk Area Water Charges for the two (2) additional lots at the time of building permit unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. The amount due is $4,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit. 10. Payment of Trunk Area Sewer Charges for the two (2) additional lots at the time of bullding permit. The amount due is $4,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit. 11. Payment of sewer connection fee of $240.00 and water connection fee of $240.00 for the new two (2) additional lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. 12. Payment of the MCES SAC charge for each of the two (2) new lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. The amount due shall be the current amount in effect at the time. 13. As applicable, if the subdivision requires the construction of utility improvements, these activities must be constructed and installed prior to the release of the resolution or submittal of a contractor's estimate, which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director (or designee) and submitted of an cash escrow in the amount of 125 percent of the contractor's estimate. The minor subdivision is approved for the property described on the attached Exhibit A . Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of May 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor 1 1 RESOLUTION NO 14- RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR PROPERTY AT 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE PLANNING CASE NO. 14-06 PID # 13- 117 -24 -31 -0040 WHEREAS, the applicants, Art and Barb King, submitted a request for a minor subdivision to create three buildable parcels from the existing lots of record that make up the property at 2201 Centerview Lane; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R -2 (Single and Two Family Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of the City Code; and WHEREAS, the following table shows the minimum requirements for the R -2 District for a single - family lot and evaluation of the proposed new lots' conformity with the regulations: ; and WHEREAS, the proposed new lots meet the requirements of the R -2 District for a non - lot of record with the exception of the side setback for the existing house, which is currently 6.9 feet, and the minimum lot depth for Parcel A; and WHEREAS, variance approval was requested to address these two conditions; and -1071- WHEREAS, the 20,265 square foot property currently includes an existing single family home that was constructed in 1940 and fronts Centerview Lane. The property also has frontage on Noble Lane. The owners, who purchased the property in April 2013, indicated that the existing house would be retained on proposed Parcel C, if a subdivision was undertaken. The applicants also expressed interest in constructing a detached accessory structure on proposed Parcel C along with a future addition to connect the existing house with the proposed detached garage. Both the proposed detached garage and future addition are shown on the submitted subdivision survey and are shown in conforming locations; and WHEREAS, the proposed 3 -lot arrangement qualified as a minor subdivision as described in Sec. 121 -35 (1) of the City Code as it contains three or fewer residential lots and does not involve the construction of public facilities or public improvements; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; 1072- (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. ; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report dated April 30, 2014 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, lots approved as part of a minor subdivision, including those with existing structures, are no longer eligible for "lot of record" status and are required to meet the same standards as new lots; and WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the variance request and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the variance request at its May 6, 2014 meeting and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its May 27, 2014 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the variance request, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria in Sec. 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The proposed new lots meet the standards for a non -lot of record with the exception of the existing side setback for the existing house, which is 6.9 feet and not changing as a result of the subdivision and lot depth. 3. A variance for lot depth for Parcel A is reasonable as the City's definition is difficult to apply due to its proposed shape /configuration. The lot size for proposed Parcel A is 7706 sq. ft. which exceeds the 6000 sq. ft. requirement. Portions of proposed Parcel A meet or exceed the 80 foot minimum lot depth requirement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance request with the following conditions: The minor subdivision is approved. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. -1073- 3. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 4. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all applicable conditions have been met. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 8. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the variance application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The variances are approved for the property described on the attached Exhibit A . Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of May 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -1074- MINUTE EXCERPTS MAY 6, 2014 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist & Pete Wiechert. Staff present: Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd); Art & Barb King (2964 Pelican Point Cir); Loren Pellet (5660 Sunnybrook Cir); Matt Van Nelson (2925 Meadow La); Grant Johnson (6347 Bay Ridge Rd) BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 14 -05 3 Lot Minor Subdivision &Variance 2201 Centerview Lane Applicant: Art and ;Barb "'King Trapp introduced the case consisting of two variances: 1) existing home to property edge on the south and 2) parcel A lot depth. Trapp noted that the lot depth meets standards on the north side but not on the south due to the shape of the lot. The existing home is planned to be kept and the applicant is planning to construct a detached garage and possibly a connector breezeway. Property is guided low density residential and zoned R2. The lot of record designation disappears once the property has been subdivided. Parcel "A" is an irregularly shaped lot with inadequate lot depth on one side. Staff has determined that it makes more sense to process this deficiency as a variance. There are no floodplain or wetland issues. Park dedication will be required at $1100 per lot. Preliminary review triggers no watershed requirement until building permit issuance. Water and sewer will have to be stubbed to the property line. Hardcover is very close to 30% on all three parcels and house pads are demonstrated. The list of conditions is pretty standard and findings of fact are included. Art King — 2964 Pelican Point Cir —Water connection points seem to be there. House size could be increased with the use of permeable pavers. Discussion Retterath supports the project. It's put together pretty nicely. The utility issues will get sorted out. Wegscheid agreed with Retterath. MOTION by Goode, second by Gawtry, to recommend approval to include recommendations and findings of Staff. MOTION carried unanimously. -1075- r _.. GITY C7f' h40UNa__ PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner DATE: April 30, 2014 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 6, 2014 OWNERS: Art and Barb King APPLICANT: Art King REQUEST: Minor Subdivision and Variance - 2201 Centerview Lane CASE NUMBER: 14 -01 and 14 -06 PROPERTY ID: 13- 117 -24 -31 -0040 ZONING: R -2 Single and Two Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential The applicant is proposing a 3 lot minor subdivision of the property at 2201 Centerview Lane and is requesting review by the Planning Commission. Variance approval is also being requested as the 6.9 foot side setback for the existing house on Parcel C becomes non- conforming when the setback changes from 6 feet for a lot of record to 10 feet for a non -lot of record and to address the minimum lot depth requirement as it applies to Parcel A. Planning Commission members may recall that a concept /sketch plan for this property was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission at its the November 5, 2013 meeting and a "modified" concept /sketch plan was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its March 4, 2014 meeting. -1076- SITE INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND The 20,265 square foot property currently includes an existing single family home that was constructed in 1940 and fronts Centerview Lane. The property also has frontage on Noble Lane. The owner, who purchased the property in April 2013, has indicated that the existing house would be retained on parcel C if a subdivision was undertaken. The applicant has also expressed interest in constructing a detached accessory structure on parcel C along with a future addition to connect the existing house with the proposed detached garage. Both the proposed detached garage and future addition are shown on the submitted subdivision survey. REVIEW PROCEDURE Subdivision Whenever a subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner, or authorized agent, shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance with the procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 121. The proposed lot arrangement qualifies as a minor subdivision as described in Sec. 121 -35 (1) of the City Code as it contain three or fewer residential lots and does not involve the construction of public facilities or public improvements. Variance. City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; -1077- (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. TIMELINES FOR ACTION Minnesota statutes require approval or denial of a subdivision request by an agency within 120 days. The minor subdivision application was submitted on April 1, 2014. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 120 -day rule for the subdivision application and was determined to be April 2, 2014. The City's deadline for action on the minor subdivision request is on or around July 30, 2014. Minnesota Statutes 15.99 requires approval or denial of a zoning request within 60 -days unless an extension is executed. The variance application was received on April 21, 2014. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule for land use applications in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 15.99 and was determined to be April 22, 2014. Therefore, the City's deadline for action on the variance application, unless an extension is executed, is on or around June 20, 2014. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan —The City's current Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Low Density Residential, which allows for single - family detached and attached housing types within the density range of 1 to 6 units per acre. Density is computed area wide as opposed to an individual site. The proposed subdivision meets the Comprehensive Plan guidance. Zoning —The subject property is located in the R -2 (Single and Two Family Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of the City Code. It should be noted that lots approved as part of a minor subdivision, including those with existing structures, are no longer eligible for "lot of record" status and must meet the same standards as new lots. The following table shows the minimum requirements for the R -2 District for a single - family lot. Based on Staff review of the proposed lot configuration, the proposed new lots meet the requirements with the exception of the side setback for the existing house which is currently 6.9 feet. A variance has been requested as the side setback for a non -lot of record is 10 feet. 1 Note: Some dimensions are approximate and were determined by Staff. Floodplain. Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 23 (Floodplain) in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be floodplain on the subject property. Per code, all new structures must meet or exceed the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or be three feet above the OHWH of wetland, as applicable. This will be a condition of approval for the subdivision. Wetlands . Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.4 (Wetlands) from the 2030 Mound Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be wetlands on the subject property. Park Land Dedication. Dedication of park land and /or payment of fees in lieu of land dedication is required by Sec. 121 -121 of the City Code. If a future subdivision is approved, Staff recommends the submittal of a cash payment in lieu of park dedication. For minor subdivisions, the approved 2014 fee is $1,100.00 per lot. As one credit would be granted for the existing lot, $2,200.00 in park dedication fees would be required for a proposed 3 -lot subdivision. Park dedication fees will be collected prior to the release of the resolution for recording. -1079- INFRASTRUCTURE Storm Water. Stormwater permitting is under the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) following regulatory authority turn back to the District by the Mound City Council which took place in August, 2011. MCES Sewer Area Charge (SAC). The 2014 MCES fee for a SAC unit is $2,485.00. MCES charge will be collected at the time of building permit issuance for the two (2) lots and shall be the amount in effect at the time. City Water /Sewer Trunk Area Charges. The 2014 trunk water fee is $2,000.00 per lot and the 2014 trunk sewer charge is $2,000.00 per lot. Payment of trunk water and trunk sewer charges for each of the two (2) additional lots will be collected prior to release of the resolution. Applicant is advised that a request can be made to the Council to request these fees be paid at time of building permit issuance for the future new homes similar to the MCES SAC charges; however, the amount would then be the fee in effect at that time. City Water /Sewer Connection Fees. The 2014 sewer connection fee is $240.00 per lot and the 2014 water connection fee is $240.00 for each of the two (2) additional lots. This will be collected at the time of building permit issuance and shall be the amounts in effect at the time. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the sketch plan application and supporting materials were forwarded to involved departments, consultants and agencies for review and comment. Comments received to date have been summarized below: Public Works Director Carlton Moore Building Official Scott Qualle Orono Police Chief Correy Farniok Finance Director Catherine Pausche There are utility services available to the existing house only. There are no water or sewer services stubbed to the proposed new lots. I have no comment. No issues. I have no comment. City Engineer Dan Faulkner Everything seems to be in order; no comments. t:1 MCWD District Rep. Tom Dietrich Xcel Energy Rep. Lynn Longfield DISCUSSION After preliminary review, no District rules will be triggered by sub - division of the parcel at 2201 Centerview Lane in Mound. However, the individual property owners of the newly subdivided lots will be subject to the District's Erosion Control rule for any proposed homes with disturbance exceeding 5,000 square feet or 50 cubic yards of excavation. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. See attached email dated 4 -14 -2014. 1. The property currently has lot of record status and therefore meets setback requirements. However, once the minor subdivision occurs all three lots will be subject to the R -2 lot standards for new lots or non -lot of record. This will result in the lot with the existing home to have a nonconforming side yard setback (south) of 6.9 feet. A variance has been submitted by the applicant for this condition as part of the subdivision process. Staff is supportive of this variance request given that it is an existing condition resulting from the 1940 placement of the home on the property rather than a variance being created by the subdivision process itself. 2. One of the discussion items during the Planning Commission's review of the concept /sketch plans was the lot depth for proposed Parcel A (Lot 14 & 15) and how it is determined based on the configuration of the lot. The definition for lot depth is the mean horizontal distance between the front and rear property lines. Using the information provided in the submitted plan and application of the lot depth definition, per code, the lot depth for Parcel A is approximately 71 feet which is less than the required 80 foot minimum. However, it is important to note that portions of the north side of the lot meet the lot depth. The application of the definition to this lot is difficult due to its configuration. It is also important to note that the Parcel A is the largest of the 3 proposed lots. Members may recall that the Planning Commission's discussion at the March 2014 meeting was that lot depth determination for this lot, according to the code, was difficult due to its shape. At the direction of Staff, the applicant has applied for a variance to lot depth for this parcel. Given the size of the lot and its orientation Staff is supportive of this variance. -1081- Permitting for wetlands (with the exception of WCA boundary determination), stormwater, floodplain alteration, erosion control and shoreline alteration is the responsibility of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) effective September 2011, 4. The applicant has confirmed that there are no bank mortgages or liens on the subject property. 5. Applicant is advised that the hardcover for the subject lots is very close to the 30 percent maximum. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested minor subdivision and variance for the property at 2201 Centerview Lane subject to the following conditions: 1. Driveways must be hard surfaced in accordance with City Code regulations. Minimum driveway width is 10 feet; maximum width is 24 feet. 2. Drainage shall not be directed to neighboring properties. 3. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction, including but not limited to, installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be the responsibility of the permit holder. 4. As part of the City's approval of the subdivision, the dedication of public drainage and utility easements, to be determined by the Public Works Director, will be required and shall be submitted in a form to allow for recording at Hennepin County, and shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City, prior to recording. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. Applicant is advised that there are historic indian burial mounds and /or earthwork sites in and around the City of Mound. While many of the mounds have been severely impacted by development over the years, the mounds do, however, receive protection under state law; and penalties are imposed for unauthorized disturbance of mounds. The City maintains some general information about possible sites in an inventory of the "Earthwork /Mound /Burial Areas' contained on the Cultural Resources Map in the Mound Comprehensive Plan and in surveys of the burial sites from Hill and Lewis in 1911 but the completeness of accuracy of this information is unknown. Additional information may be obtained through the Minnesota State Archeologist. Any formal investigation of a site, including a determination of whether a mound or burial area exists on a subject site, is the responsibility of the property owner or -1082- developer. The issuance of permits by the City to do work on a site does not relieve the owner or the developer of that responsibility. 7. Payment of park dedication fees as required by Sec. 121 of the City Code prior to the release of the resolution for recording. The amount due is $1,100.00 for each of the two (2) new lots ($2200.00 total.) 8. Payment of Trunk Area Water Charges for each of the two (2) additional lots prior to the release of the resolution unless an alternate schedule is requested and approved by the Council. The amount due is 4,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit, if an alternate schedule is requested and is approved by the Council. 9 Payment of Trunk Area Sewer Charges for each of the two (2) additional lots prior to the release of the resolution unless an alternate schedule requested and is approved by the Council. The amount due is $4,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit if an alternate schedule is requested and approved by the Council. 10. Payment of sewer connection fee of $240.00 and water connection fee of $240.00 for each of the new two (2) additional lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. 11. Payment of the MCES SAC charge for each of the two (2) new lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. The amount due shall be the current amount in effect at the time. 12. As applicable, if the subdivision requires the construction of utility improvements, these activities must be constructed and installed prior to the release of the resolution or submittal of a contractor's estimate, which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director (or designee) and submitted of an cash escrow in the amount of 125 percent of the contractor's estimate. In recommending approval of the minor subdivision and variance, Staff offers the following findings: 1. The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The subject lots have frontage on improved public streets and municipal utilities are available. 3. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed lot arrangement can accommodate the construction of new single - family homes with conforming setbacks and hardcover. 4. The two new proposed single - family residential lots will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on adjoining property. 5. The criteria in Sec. 129 -39 (a) are being met. 6. The proposed new lots meet the standards for a non -lot of record with the exception of the existing side setback for the existing house which is 6.9 and is not changing as a result of the subdivision. I: Variance for lot depth for Parcel A is reasonable as the City's definition is difficult to apply due to its proposed shape /configuration. The lot size for proposed Parcel A is 7,706 sq. ft. which exceeds the 6,000 sq. ft. requirement. Portions of the proposed parcel meet or exceed the 80 foot minimum lot depth requirement. The applicant has demonstrated that a house and garage can be placed on the lot given its shape. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation(s) is received from the Planning Commission, it is anticipated that the minor subdivision and variance requests will be reviewed at an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time, possible dates are Tuesday, May 13, 2014 or Tuesday, May 27, 2014. 1:I APR 1 2044 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 - 472 -0600 FAX 952- 472 -0620 i Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. PLANNING COMM. DATE CASE NO. CITY COUNCIL DATE: Please type or print clearly EXISTING Subject Address 1-20 1 CIENTEPZVIE.W LAME PROPERTY i'A ok LEGAL Lot 14,IW�Ir_�ock_ Subdivision 1'1BEp+wA LttNGou/ Bspl ITHIIJ DESCRIPTION PID# 13-111-7-q-91-0040 Zoning: R7 R1A a R3 87 B2 B3 (Circle one) APPLICANT The applicant is: owner other _ Email Aer. Vt��@ itilF�'TEC.N.cop\ Name Ara-r sX/ "" Vtt b Address �Zq (a i pEl°t.C}tN Pbl t rT c j 9-GLE- Moor-+§o MN 4 Phone Home Gf?-760 -846-1 Work (nib- -707--t2q®i Fax & -- 76*2-��� OWNER Name k{ r 1' BARB l N L Email lk2t I3AEL kLtiG (,P C (if other than applicant) Address A-na Pra ai4&bV . Phone Home Work Fax SURVEYOR/ Name 5MVEAf V. t{E Email 5i5CNO-19 PR£wtrEZ- 5VRI(Eq. �6 ENGINEER Address F8 QDX 234. VIOToai,*,t ywx) ss38fo Phone Office Cell iS2 °31?3-0Yf"7 Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, fro no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premi escribed in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posti g, m 'tai ' g 77 such notices as may be required by law. l Applicants Si nature Date ( 1114 Owner's Signature Date Minor Subdivision Information (1A 8/2013) Page 4 of 4 -1085- L-1 Z 126 1 t,f VARIANCE �w D APPLICATION 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date IYIAk l 6-rN Case No. City Council Date prim 17 TO Please t it nr nrint leaihiv SUBJECT Address "2.2-01 C9 4 tti M l tA) i._.A W F ca p Lot t 1 °� 1 M DuS�,D &2L91, uf}`rT� j' Block PROPERTY LEGAL DESC. Subdivisio7onA�t2v`RAiM Lit,tol- Ii ,AApi-no;J LA- yYFsof PA�2-�' PID# 1.7 =11"1 "2-q'3i -06°r0 Zoning: Rt R1A0 R3 81 B2 B3 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name JMIRT- a i3 .A-e-15 `((*t(cz, Email 1Aer • Kr fU @T{tl' ( (aC OWNER 71�� Address 2564 42�C& Tblf ✓T C I I/ujoiwQ• 00 553b Phone Home h2--7W-'3q5-7 Work Fax (bQ_= 112-12-6 i APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conortlonai use permit, or otner zoning proceeure for this property? Yes ( ) No If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutio s. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): �crgDltflslar� ©� i�rrs V��s �xisTi�+� sr¢�-ru�e� t�aN- C O N 1502 U t IJ 6 N O%_ ' 1,31F .1 6 A � Lv I LL F3, CON-550N fo C� AND 14AT CIT11 Vacs 'tHC L_aT 'DEPTH Gds PZT- variance Information G n ,r n (10/2112013) Page 4 of 6 �}U THE- '�(��1�1� PS?1 -H f f? PPrRCEA, ILI I 1, I AC10u86 ��� AS PMt P0sF-f� } Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (x). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): _'51 OF- VOID REQUIRED OD -J W051 SLOE lS eVoN-Cbr./t'C ti(-- � YGfIiC J'�t13C7 CC>31�J�. SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: ( N (a W) 20 ft. 2 5t l ft. - ft. Side Yard: ( N S E(D) 10 ft. Ga 9 ft. y,_ft, Side Yard: (N S E W) to ft. L D ft. _. ft. Rear Yard: ( N S E W) 9 ft. 2 ©. ft. -f) ft. Lakeside: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: ft. ft. - ®" ft. Lot Size: 000 -sq ft ink i8 sq ft -'Cy sq ft Hardcover: 3C76 18 r 14 sa ft Leo 5 —s-1 ft =0 sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes W, No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? Atoo narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage X existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape "other: specify Please describe: S t 5r ALA• CG-I-At"&rZ -S 15 t /VK-wd LAJ 64L Variance Information (10/21/2013) Page 5 of 6 1: GO Case No. 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes )4, No ( ). If yes, explain: 7 Nj;.16 014, r-tof ©N Sl0or— L-OT 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (1\6 If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes W, No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by IpW. Owner's Applican Variance Information (10/21/2013) Page 6 of 6 1088- Date Z! 11q Date 21 f (, _ Sarah Smith From: Longfield, Lynn M [ Lynn .M.Longfield @xcelenergy.com] Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 1:50 PM To: Jill Norlander; Ray Hanson; Dan Faulkner; Scott Qualle; Manderschied, Melissa J.; Rita Trapp, Greg Pederson (gpederson @moundfire.com), Coney Farniok; Carlton Moore; Catherine Pausche; Jack Gleason; tdietrich @minnehahacreek.org; Alta Denisova Centerpoint; Christopher Thompson Mediacom; Steven Storo Frontier; Anderson, Bonnie J Cc: Sarah Smith Subject: RE: Centerview Subdivision Attachments: 2201 Centerview Ln, Mound.pdf; GIS Map Symbols Legend_2010.pdf Xcel Energy has electrical facilities in this area of subdivision. Please see attached GIS map & legend of symbols. Thank you, Lynn Longfield < >< Xcel Energy I Responsible By Nature 5505 Manitou Road, Excelsior, MN, 55331 952.470.3313, C: 612.669.4138, 952.470.3310 E: lynn.m.longfield@xcelenergy.com Please consider the environment before printing this email. Also, please excuse any brevity andlor typos in this email. —This e -mail, and any attachments, may contain confidential or private material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments, From: Jill Norlander [ mailto •jillnorlander@cityofmound.com} Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 3:36 PM To: Ray Hanson; Dan Faulkner; Scott Qualle; Manderschied, Melissa J.; Rita Trapp; Greg Pederson (gpedersongmoundfire com); Correy Farniok; Carlton Moore; Catherine Pausche; Jack Gleason; tdietrich(dminnehahacreek.org; Alla Denisova Centerpoint; Christopher Thompson Mediacom; Longfield, Lynn M; Steven Storo Frontier; Anderson, Bonnie J Cc: Sarah Smith Subject: Centerview Subdivision Please review and respond to Sarah by April 21 ". Thanks. crrr.. n,,+Wa Sill Norlander, Admin Assist 952 -472 -0607 Phone 952- 472 -0620 Fax City Hall Hours MQN - FRI 8:00 - 4:30 -1089- 1 Smallworld Electric Distribution Symbols January 2010 Primary Meter NM Non - metered Facility Manhole Retired Manhole Generic Pad Transformer Pad Medical Alert Condition -(- Lot Centroid Xcel /Unknown Dist. Pole xy l,. Foreign Dist. Pole overhea d Cust. Owned Dist. Pole C) Xcel /Unknown Orn. Pole -,, O Cust. Owned Orn. Pole -\, Xcel Trans. Pole C5) PMH -5 (D PMH -9 Foreign Trans. Pole t'tru Xcel Trans. Tower fisb PMH -10 Electric Riser �. 95, Primary Open " 9(¢ n Anchor Guy Substation Push Brace Ground Brace -- H Fixture Primary Meter NM Non - metered Facility Manhole Retired Manhole Generic Pad Transformer Pad Medical Alert Condition -(- Lot Centroid Vault xy l,. Retired Vault overhea d Secondary Transformer Secondary Pedestal -,, O Metered Secondary -\, Streetlight Control C5) PMH -5 (D PMH -9 Secondary Splice Box t'tru Primary Splice Box fisb PMH -10 Retired Splice Box �. 95, Primary Open " 9(¢ n Secondary Open Primary Meter NM Non - metered Facility Manhole Retired Manhole Generic Pad Transformer Pad Medical Alert Condition -(- Lot Centroid Deferral Cabinet Transformers f - Switching Facility Symbols overhea d Underground Switch Centers -,, O One -phase -\, � (3 PMH -3 C5) PMH -5 (D PMH -9 OH & UG Switch t'tru Agp fisb PMH -10 C1j pMH -11 PMH -12 �. 95, Three - phase " 9(¢ n Automated 0 Unknown Substation wye -wye Elbow Center Two -phase wye -delta ��,. 9� Open Elbow C/ Closed Elbow 9� Three -phase Open Cable Terminator C wye -delta Closed Cable Terminator �tp n Step-up/ Vacuum Switch Step -down Vacuum Interrupter �p P Three - phase delta "` ; Y�� Busbar -delta Directional. Nightwatch d1 One -phase �' _ i Area Nightwatch delta 41 . _7 Three -phase V O I —� Xcel /Unknown Street Light P delta -wye - �- Cust. Owned Street Light 9� poopen Three -phase ,VV 9�P ; < Ornamental Light delta -open delta Lightning Arrestor Deferral Cabinet SSj Sectionalizer Bank Substation ((j l Cogeneration Note: Actual Location Symbols are 1/2 size of the normal symbols _1091_ ay in color. Neutral Isolating Device Primary Intersect ® Connector UG Primary Splice Component Primary Splice UG Secondary Splice • Switches & Fuses f - Closed F Open OH & UG Point Disconnect Switch 2a X OH & UG Switch t'tru Agp OH & UG ATO 1AT1011 OH & UG Fuse °1a OCB Substation OCBI SSj Sectionalizer Bank Substation ((j l Cogeneration Note: Actual Location Symbols are 1/2 size of the normal symbols _1091_ ay in color. Neutral Isolating Device Primary Intersect ® Connector UG Primary Splice Component Primary Splice UG Secondary Splice • Clrcutt Breaker f - OH Capacitor F UG Capacitor Regulator Bank Point °) Recloser Bank SSj Sectionalizer Bank Substation ((j l Cogeneration Note: Actual Location Symbols are 1/2 size of the normal symbols _1091_ ay in color. Neutral Isolating Device Primary Intersect ® Connector UG Primary Splice Component Primary Splice UG Secondary Splice • Mid -Span Tap n Cable Failure Indicator F Fault Indicator Locator Symbol Status: Black denotes "Install" status Symbol with an X denotes "Remove" status Electric XY Primary Structure Node Secondary Structure Node Misc Electric Landmark Point Error Symbol: Errorwith Attributes; Unable to Symbol Status: Black denotes "Install" status Symbol with an X denotes "Remove" status Primary and Secondary Change Marker OH Prim — + - - - -- OH Sec UG Sec i Annotation Mules UG Fuse size is not annotated on distribution maps. NSP -MN and NSP WI The following are NOT annotated: 65 Amp Fuses (size) • UG 1/0 Secondaries • UG 6 Duplex Street Wire • UG 4/0 AL TX feeding a pedestal. (Do not make 4/0 secondaries feeding pedestal coincident.) PSCO and SPS The following are NOT annotated: • OH 65 Amp Fuses (size) • UG 350 Al Triplex Secondary • UG 12/2 Cu Duplex Secondary Component One Phase Component Two Phase Component Three Phase Component Mainline Component Secondary Secondary Neutral Only 2 Wire Service _._______.____ --- _____ 3 Wire Service "- - - -- __ - - - --` 4 Wire Service Transmission Line Span Guy Error Symbol: Error with Attributes; Unable to Symbolize Correctly Customer Pointer Retired UG Primary - Retired UG Secondary Conduit Retired Conduit = - -- Duct Bank Retired Duct Bank UG Route Trench -- -- -.._- .....--- _.____.. UG Route Joint Trench Joint Trench Line Tunnel Gas Tunnel Cable Segments Cable Segment Break Point 0 Cable Segment - Cable Segment Delete Old Cable Segment If you find discrepancies on a map, please make the necessary changes on the Map Copy and send it (along with your name and location) to: Minnesota Colorado Mapping Department Mapping Department c/o Allan Radke, Mgr c/o Bill Lucatuorto, Mgr Chestnut Service Center (CSC) - I Lipan Distribution Center (LDC) - 1 ^° for — Art King 2201 Centerview Lane Mound, Mn 55364 Proposed Parcel A: That part of Lots 14, 15, 19. and 20, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION LAKESIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 14; thence South 60 degrees 12 minutes 23 seconds East, assumed bearing along the northeasterly line of said Lot 14, 85.44 feet. to the Northeast corner of said Lot 14; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 49 seconds West, along the southeasterly line of said Lot 14, 23.40 feet, thence South 25 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds West, 76.53 feet to a point on the southwesterly line ofsaid Lot 19, distant 80.00 feet northwesterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 19, as measured along said southwesterly line; thence North 60 degrees 15 minutes 17 seconds West, along said southwesterly line of Lot 19, and its northwesterly extension, 56.88 feet, to the West line of said Block 6, thence North 00 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West, along said West line, 68.72 feet to the southeasterly line of Downs Ave., as dedicated in said plat thence North 29 degrees 48 minutes 32 seconds East, along the northwesterly line of said Lot 14, 40.01 feet to the point of beginning. Proposed Parcel B: Lot 21, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and that part of Lot 20 in said plat described as fol lows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 21; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 49 seconds West, assumed bearing along the northwesterly line of said Lot 20, 23.40 feet; thence South 59 degrees 41 minutes 56 seconds East, 85.36 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot 20, thence North 29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds East, along said southeasterly line, 24.15 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 20, thence North 60 degrees 12 minutes 08 seconds West, along the northeasterly fine of said Lot 20, 85.36 feet to the point of beginning. Proposed Parcel C: That part of Lots 19 and 20, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 20; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds West, assumed bearing along the southeasterly line of said Lot 20, 24.15 feet to the point of beginning; thence continue South 29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds West, along the southeasterly line of said Lots 19 and 20, 75.73 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 19; thence North 60 degrees 15 minute 17 seconds West, along the southwesterly line of said Lot 19, 80.00 feet; thence North 25 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds West, 76.53 feet, to the West line of said Lot 20; thence South 59 degrees 41 minutes 56 seconds East, 85.36 feet to the point of beginning. Hard Surface Calculations: Parcel A: Parcel B: Parcel C: Lot Area: 7706 s.f Lot Area: 6281 s.f. Lot Area: 6278 s.f. Prop, House: 1040 s.f. Prop. House: 874 s.f. Exist. House: 627 s.f. Prop. Gar: 480 s.f. Prop. Gar: 480 s.f. Prop. Add.: 240 s.f. Prop. DW.• 636 s.f. Prop. DW 479 s.f. Prop. Gar.: 480 s.f. Total H.S.: 2156 s.f. Total H.S.: 1833 s.f Prop. DW.- 458 s.f. H.S. % 27.98 H.S, %: 29.18 Total H. S.: 1805 s.f H. S. %: 28.75 1 hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ` 0 940.9 6 X CL I s o X X n0 ga 3 gag ° °i POND 3 , 940.1 /XSao 6 1 X X gpti o � 941.4 / X '\, \ 940.9 C / Xry \ \ S S ^9/4 - Sb,Oo r 6075 SS x g 8 g �2? °� hO O `` BSS S6 F / 1.a � / m °�. o o � � o` �p0.,� �\ Doti � / gd'�6 ' x CEp. 3 5 / O� PAR /e gQ0"g sco •0C y ,1 '¢ / yo J �J�J ° \ h, / 1 o o�s a $ \ 4 r� 4( \ apn m ° g ry /X L X g1 941.8 N, pb \ X C7 Ljx W a 7,9, oQ 2> g�� h � `. ua^ n 41 �C31 o / l `S9� rygs °j Saa�A \3 \ 00 0,�m�o� 9n Fbsr "n 9G�c X5 gAry N X garL W (,�/+ g8� X e °V ��O / V �6 W f]�" I \ / w 949.y e6 $O °J /'�•� g0. Q'( hXgS saa. o 944.1`- \ X r 3y / 943.7 S6 r /c�' tr0!- O 222 2 oX °o / q ?° ` rasa x945.9 N 949.7 19 �`o \� �g� ti 0 5 a / < "sas.o 6O 76.171> 600, zaa ttr} 2� 952.0 g6�< 7 0 /c. \ � '�' `�' s. e"'a � t ry�b co <NF <YyFF / g 219 C2 Ore <it,FOOC 3 18 952.0 / 948.2 y"" Existing Property Description: Lots 14, 19, 20, 21, and that part of Lot 15 lying Northeasterly of the /X aoo Northeasterly line of Lot 18, extended Northwesterly across said Lot 15, all in Block 6, ABRAHAMLINCOLN ADDITION LAKE SIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Subject to easements of record. Containing 20,265 sq. ft / 0.46 Acres +/- 22703 03131114 REVISED: 04122114 - PARCEL A & B Steven V. Ische License No. Date REVISED: 04/01/14 - PARCEL C Traverse PC Note: Sewer & Water services shown as marked by City of Mound and as -built plans sewer service shown per 1963 as -built plan prepared by Schoell & Madsen LEGEND O Set Iron Monument Found Iron Monument Q Sanitary Manhole —w--- Watermain —ss— Sanitary Sewer © Catch Basin x945.0 Existing Elevation x(945.0) Proposed Elevation -- - - - -- Proposed Surface Drainage OREMIER LAND SURVEYING, LLC 952 - 443 -3010 -1093- 11111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 iiiiiiiiiiiilii t ' • Property Address: 2201 Centerview Lane Mound, Mn 55364 Description of Property Surveyed. Lots 14, 19, 20, 21, and that part of Lot 15 lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly line of Lot 18, extended Northwesterly across said Lot 15, all in Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION LAKE SIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Subject' to easements of record. Containing 20,265 sq. ft / 0.46 Acres +/- Hard Cover Calculations: Existing House: 625 sq. ft. Existing Sidewalk: 85 sq. ft. Existing Driveway. 691 sq. ft. Total Hard Cover. 1401 sq. ft. Hard Cover %: 6.91 I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 22703 12116113 Steven v Ische License No. Date Traverse PC i / / I M LEGEND O Set Iron Monument Found Iron Monument �m c° u° POND sso � h � ey�sr 21 14 W �\ / �� gs Np x\96 /} Z / 20 15 Nsoo / � 8s36, 'g F T n OF 19 3 ?� \ }C11 �' N o 60 7s ��� 2�3• �� sa r 7 'a- 18 i Revised 12119113 - Interior Lot Dimensions Revised 01107114 - Hard Cover Calculations m �nj n oh ry y �a OREMIER LAND SURVEYING. LLC 952 - 443 -3010 -1094 - RE.CT APR 12014 Government Finance Officers Association 203 N. LaSalle Street - Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60601 Phone(312)977 -9700 Fax(312)977 -4806 November 15, 2013 Kandis M. Hanson City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound MN 55364 Dear Ms. Hanson: We are pleased to notify you that your comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 qualifies for a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. The Certificate of Achievement plaque will be shipped to: Catherine Pausche Director of Finance & Administrative Services under separate cover in about eight weeks. We hope that you will arrange for a formal presentation of the Certificate and Award of Financial Reporting Achievement, and that appropriate publicity will be given to this notable achievement. A sample news release is enclosed to assist with this effort. In addition, details of recent recipients of the Certificate of Achievement and other information about Certificate Program results are available in the "Awards Program" area of our website, www.gfoa.org. We hope that your example will encourage other government officials in their efforts to achieve and maintain an appropriate standard of excellence in financial reporting. Sincerely, Government Finance Officers Association AVOIU41 � Stephen J. Gauthier, Director Technical Services Center SJG /ds -1095- Government Finance Officers Association 203 N. LaSalle Street - Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60601 a Phone (312) 977 -9700 Fax(312)977-4806 11/15/2013 NEWS RELEASE For Information contact: Stephen Gauthier (312)977 -9700 (Chicago) - -The Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting has been awarded to City of Mound by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR). The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. An Award of Financial Reporting Achievement has been awarded to the individual(s), department or agency designated by the government as primarily responsible for preparing the award- winning CAFR. This has been presented to: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance & Administrative Services The CAFR has been judged by an impartial panel to meet the high standards of the program including demonstrating a constructive "spirit of full disclosure" to clearly communicate its financial story and motivate potential users and user groups to read the CAFR, The GFOA is a nonprofit professional association serving approximately 17,500 government finance professionals with offices in Chicago, IL, and Washington, D.C. -1096- Kandis Hanson Subject: FW: Right -of -Entry form for Surfside launch for inspectors From: Jay Green [ma ! Ito: JaygreenfishingLd)yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 3:43 PM To: Kandis Hanson Cc: Catherine Pausche; Greg Nybeck Subject: Right -of -Entry form for Surfside launch for inspectors Kandis, The LMCD staff is preparing to send the city the Right -of -Entry form for the Surfside access that would allow our watercraft inspectors to perform inspections for the 2014 boating season. In the discussion with the city council last year, there were two additional requirements that needed to be met for this season. The first was to provide a summary of the inspection data from last season, including the number of potentially infested watercraft encountered. I have compiled that data and that report will be included. The second was for AIS preventative information to be distributed by the nspectors. I worked with the LMCD's AIS Tack Force, as well as members of the DNR's AIS Advisory Committee, to determine what information was available and what suited our needs the best. For the 2014 season, we will begin distributing a pamphlet that is produced by the DNR called "Help Protect Minnesota's Waters ". It includes basic preventative measures and also what is required by law. We are also going to reproduce and distribute a more comprehensive AIS booklet. This booklet, which is used by number of other groups, includes more detailed information on many styles of boats as well as docks, boatlifts and more. This booklet will be made available to the member cities, and also available to the public through the sheriff's water patrol, marinas and other locations around the lake. Both of these handouts will be included as well. Thanks Jay Green LMCD Representative - Mound -1097- MEMORANDUM DATE: May 22, 2014 TO: Mayor Hanus and Council Members FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Manaq ,' Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer 5341. MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH. (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cltyofmound.com RE: Update on costs to move City Hall and upgrade the Centennial Building as rental property for non - profits A report on the cost of moving City Hall was printed in the Spring /Summer edition of the City Contact. An update of the report is now available that better defines and more accurately depicts the categories of spending. In the last months of 2012, the Cities of Mound and Orono completed negotiations for contracted police services, leaving vacant the police space at the Mound Public Safety Facility. A two -fold decision was made by the City of Mound: 1) Mound City Hall would move to the former police space, and 2) the former City Hall would be converted to rental space for non - profit and quasi - governmental organizations. (Currently, the Centennial Building has four tenants with room for 1 -3 more tenants. It has served to provide space for a sector of organizations otherwise underserved.) The spreadsheet attached shows the cost o£ 1) preparing a police precinct for use by Orono PD, 2) the cost of conversion of police office space for use as a city hall, and 3) the cost of conversion of former city hall to rental space. Finally, it shows the cost of maintenance and repairs that were due the two buildings. From a business perspective, the return on investment related to these building improvements is considered healthy -10 months for improvements to new City Hall space and 4 months for improvements to the Centennial Building. Contracting for police services is a long -term commitment and promises six - figure savings for Mound on a long -term consistent basis. -1098- printed on racyclao paper Maintenance to what are aging buildings will always be a factor and must be planned for in the continuum. Staff continues to encourage that the move to contracted policing was a good one and that money spent to facilitate the decision was done with frugality just enough to make these spaces function in their new purpose, without excess or frills. Staff would be pleased to assist in any discussion. 1099- y t a C 3 O `o Y a d a N E E @ m v L N p 0 @ C O 'O @ L M O O U N N C @Y c 00 o m a c p N @ a n � N m c c @ > p @ c w � O d � m E o - U c @ O t N V U � N p c c o> o Q N O w Q 0 0 m � -p a [a m > c � m Z ac O N 0 v 3 N 0 a y _ p L m c E E 0 O O 0 0 N m 0 m 0 E w m c @ E C O O 01 V O O O O O O O C d '0 p 69 f9 IA V V m O O y N N N O Y1 m O �O O M 06 G > p O O OJ M O O N N N p N Y1 F 6 C M M M M V .1i M m (Op O @ O y � 2 LL _U U o. O O O O O O O O N N O O O O O M R O N O O 6 O y V f9 T W v1 V V p C r r O N Q U N a a 00 00 00 00 00 0. M U O V t0 O O O O O O O @ C OJ N d N M C � O) C N t N N U N O Z O _pi O C O pj '00 O. O1 U ¢ U p N N M Z CpO c o ° Z Z Z o� 0° o v n C c m c -p W M c6 y w w `o_ c `o m O M c m m m d c co E O c L c c c @ co n aNi c m U c >@ U U S d < V1 U N U m Y 0 N U Q < nr m N w U U N U N N Z_ W U N O O a U U < O a LLI Q fL } N W O Z Z Lu Z F O A z Z g m Z z O Z OU p < z ti 4 a o O CLJ 0 N g O a O < ~ z > ¢ w z z0 � = U m m 2 x 0 s U a 0 W� M iron- 2 a d a N E E @ m v L N p 0 @ C O 'O @ L M O O U N N C @Y c 00 o m a c p N @ a n � N m c c @ > p @ c w � O d � m E o - U c @ O t N V U � N p c c o> o Q N O w Q 0 0 m � -p a [a m > c � m Z ac O N 0 v 3 N 0 a y _ p L m c E E 0 O O 0 0 N m 0 m 0 E w m c @ E +qte 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX :(952)472 -0620 WEB. www.cityofmound.com MEMORANDUM DATE: May 22, 2014 TO: Mayor Hanus and Council Members FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Manager RE: Distribution of Council Packets On Apr 15, 2014, Supervisors representing the City of Mound presented their Annual Reports to the members of the Mound City Council. At this annual event, Supervisors place emphasis on what are the challenges facing their departments and forecast budgetary needs. As a part of those discussions, the topic of expediting the receipt of City Council Packets was touched upon. To maximize the time for the study of packet content, City Staff has been directed to prepare packets in time for distribution on Thursday in a week that precedes a council meeting. The only exception to that would be in the instance of mechanical difficulties with the copier, which can occur. Under the current approach, there are seven business days in which to research and /or prepare, in a week without holidays or other interruptions and /or absences. With less days, here are some examples of change: • Certain claims and topics have to be delayed until the next meeting. This means more manual checks to meet invoice deadlines in order to avoid late fees and delays for certain issues. 0 An early packet deadline adds to the last minute handouts. In this scenario, the public will not get all the information to be discussed. Council Members are invited to discuss and consider any further changes to process. -1101- ' prated on recyoled paper MEMORANDUM DATE: May 22, 2014 TO: Mayor Hanus and Council Members FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Managel�.�4 RE: Ground Breakings & Ribbon Cuttings 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (552) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityotmound.corn At a recent meeting with the City Manager and the City Council, City involvement in ground breakings and ribbon cuttings was among topics discussed. The directive `celebrate Mound' was loud and clear from early on and Staff has made it a point to seize opportunities to draw positive attention to Mound in a variety of ways. Two of those methods to celebrate have been ground breakings and ribbon cuttings. Ground breakings go back to 2002, when the City purchased the old post office, demolished it and started construction on the Greenway and Pier. Since then there have been ground breakings on public and private projects, which have included Mound MarketPlace and more recently Dakota Junction. Ribbon cuttings and other dedication ceremonies took place over the years, as we celebrated the opening of Harbor Wine & Spirits, the Public Safety Building and more recently, the Centennial Building. With the lack of public projects in the recession years, the emphasis turned to ribbon cutting events for businesses expanding in Mound or newly locating here. As part of the Centennial Celebration, we also publicly dedicated and cut the ribbon for the renamed Surfside Beach and Park. Each of these events over the years put a positive spotlight on Mound, with the goal being to overcome the prevailing negative image of Mound. In spite of the efforts of City and School to overcome the old image, the perception of Mound, in my experience and from comments that I take, continues to lag. It is Staff's opinion that any reason to celebrate puts Mound in the spotlight and continues to build a positive image for our community. Staff encourages the discussion around these topics and up -to -date Staff direction as to the wishes of the City Council. -1102- printed on recycled paper PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com MEMORANDUM DATE: May 22, 2014 TO: Mayor Hanus and Council Members Cs FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Mana`gV1 f J RE: Remembrance for former Senator Steve Smith Since the recent passing of former Senator Steve Smith, a few individuals have mentioned the appropriateness of remembering him in some way. An affiliate of Steve's with the Hennepin District Courts recommended memorializing a park bench at the Mound Greenway with a bronze plate. While holding office as Minnesota State Senator, Steve Smith did many good things worthy of recognition by the City of Mound. In my experience, he assisted in overturnng a DNR decision that would have otherwise impeded development in the downtown as we know it today. Fire Chief Greg Pederson can cite several examples of how Steve benefited fire departments and Mound Fire Department, in particular. These are just two examples of many. You are invited to discuss and decide what may be appropriate. -1103 - printeJ on recycletl paper City of Mound BMI Engineering Hours YTD as of 12/31/13 ;t.Project„ ;., Hourss # ;-, r$Billed ,, „d',Fund "; Fund /FUntling Source;` Mound /Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision 326.50 29,401.50 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners Mound /MCES Projects ,Review /Coordination 44.50 5,600.00 Escrows Escrow Accounts- Billed to property owners /agencies Mound /Development Reviews 29.50 3,723.00 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners Sewer Fees 400.50 38,724.50 76,106.40 Mound /General Engineering 254.00 21,227.50 101 General Fund/Taxes Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1 /4) 2.88 336.00 101 Streets (1 /4)/Taxes Mound /GIS Updates 1.00 95.00 101 Streets/Taxes 602 257.88 21,658.50 2.88 Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall 961.50 95,397.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /SW Island Area 103.00 9,642.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland 59.50 5,741.00 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements 7,704.50 710,071.51 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /Island View Drive Reconstruction 11.00 1,049.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall 992.50 97,420.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding 9,832.00 919,322.51 10.00 Mound /MSA System Update 65.50 9,215.00 402 Municipal State Aid for Streets (MSA Funds) Mound /2013 Crack Seal Coat Project 82.50 9,294.00 427 MSA Funds /General Funds Storm Water Fees 148.00 18,509.00 336.00 Mound /Watermain Loop Island View 15.50 1,337.00 601 Water Fees Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace 95.50 8,943.00 601 Water Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 2.88 336.00 601 Water Fees (1/4) Mound /Water Supply Emergency Consery 0.50 71.00 601 Water Fees Mound /Water System Modeling 103.00 10,744.08 601 Water Fees Mound /Wellhead Protection Plan 2.00 284.00 601 Water Fees Mound /GIS Updates 6.50 583.33 601 Water Fees 225.88 22,298.41 Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements 47.00 Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction 43.50 4,173.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction 10.50 966.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2012 Lift Station Reconstruction 46.00 4,941.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvement 609.00 76,106.40 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvement 33.50 4,009.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /I & I Analysis Report 18.00 2,250.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 2.88 33600 602 Sewer Fees (1 /4) Mound /GIS Updates 7.00 583.33 602 Sewer Fees Mound /MCES Flows /City Charges 3.50 480.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2012 MCES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct 299.00 32,253.50 602 Sewer Fees 1,072.88 126,098.23 Mound /2011 Storm Drainage Improvements 10.00 1,392.50 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /WCA Administration 18.00 1,606.50 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 2.88 336.00 675 Storm Water Fees (1/4) Mound /GIS Updates 7.00 583.34 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /SWPPP Update 18.00 1,734.50 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2012 Drainage Improvement Project 11.00 1,562.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /Surface Water Management 190.00 22,349.38 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2013 Storm Drainage Improvements 206.00 21,804.50 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements 47.00 5,815.50 675 Storm Water Fees 509.88 57,184.22 12/31/13 YTD Total 12,447.00 1,203,795.37 -1104- 2013 YTD through 4th Quarter -1105- 12,447.00 1,203, 795.37 BIIIWBSI Project Hours $ Billed C12.037921 Mound /General Engineering 254.00 21,227.50 C12.037929 Mound /WCA Administration 18.00 1,606.50 C12.038004 Mound /Water System Modeling 103.00! 10,744.08 C12.038077 Mound /I & I Analysis & 2011 CIPP Project 18.00 2,250.00 C12.038243 Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps 11.50 1,344.00 C12.038388 Mound /Water Supply Emergency Consery 0.501 71.00 C12.038996 Mound /Development Reviews 29.50, 3,723.00 C12.039286 Mound /SWPPP Update 18.00' 1,734.50 C12.039425 Mound /MSA System Coordination 65.50' 9,215.00 C12.040166 'Mound /Wellhead Protection Plan 2.00' 284.00 C12.040420 Mound /Island View Drive Reconstruction 11.00' 1,049.50 C12.100590 'Mound /GIS Updates 21.50' 1,845.00 C12.100601 Mound /MCES Flows /City Charges 3.50' 480.00 C12.101482 (Mound /SW Island Area 103.00,, 9,642.50 C12. 101514 Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland 59.50! 5,741.00 C12.101909 Mound /Surface Water Management 190.00 22,349.38 C12.102014 Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction 43.501 4,173.00 C12.103114 Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction 10.501 966.00 C12.103254 'Mound /Watermain Loop Island View 15.50 1,337.00 C12.103438 Mound /2011 Storm Drainage Improvements 10.00 1,392.50 C12.103970 Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall 961.50( 95,397.50 C12.104174 Mound /2012 Storm Drainage Improvements 11.001 1,562.00 C12.104413 'Mound /2012 Lift Station Improvement 46.00, 4,941.00 C12.105545 Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements 7,704.50; 710,071.51 C12.105673 Mound /2012 VICES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct 299.00! 32,253.50 C12.105883 Mound /Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision 326.50 29,401.50 C12.105944 'Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvment 609.00 76,106.40 C12.105964 Mound /2013 Storm Drainage Improvements 206.001 21,804.50 C12.106416 iMound /MCES Projects, Review /Coordination 44.50'1 5,600.00 C12.106810 , Mound /2013 Crack Seal and Seal Coat 82.50 9,294.00 C12.106985 Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements 47.001: 5,815.50 C12.107130 Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining W 992.501 97,420.50 C12.107414 Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvment 33.50' 4,009.00 C12.107415 Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace 95.50' 8,943.00 2013 YTD through 4th Quarter -1105- 12,447.00 1,203, 795.37 1 3 * City of Mound Ms Kandis Hanson 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 -1668 e MoundIGIS U da Services from November 9, 2013 through December 20, 2013: Professional Services Hours Technician Mackey, Caleb Meyers, Nick Totals Total Labor .l December 31, 2013 Project No: C12.100590 Invoice No: 0163101 Rate 19.00 85.00 1.50 90.00 20.50 Amount 1,615.00 135.00 1,750.00 Total this Invoice Notice: A finance charge of' '5% per month lannuat percentage of 18°/ I is charged on balances 30 days or over. -1106 - Notice: A finance charge of L5 % per Man December percentage of 18 °f 1 is charged 00 balances 30 days or over. 1,750.00 $1,750.00 City of Mound BMI Engineering Hours YTD as of 03/31/14 Project : Hours $ Billed Fund -: .:-Fund /Funding Source Mound /MCES Projects, Review /Coordination 0.50 71.00 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners /agencies Mound /Development Reviews 4.00 576.00 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners 4.50 647.00 Mound /General Engineering 67.00 5,674.78 101 General Fund/Taxes Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (114) 1.63 172.50 101 Streets (1 /4)/Taxes Mound /GIS Updates 1.00 88.00 101 Streets/Taxes 69.63 5,935.28 Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall 68.50 7,944.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /Street Light Replacement 0.00 0.00 401 Federal Grants /City Match /MSA Mound /SW Island Area 11.00 1,067.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland 1.00 90.00 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements 348.50 34,145.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /Manchester Site & Lynwood Site 0.00 0.00 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall 1,359.50 134,811.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding 1,788.50 178,059.00 Mound /MSA System Update 10.50 1,505.00 402 Municipal State Aid for Streets (MSA Funds) Mound /2013 Crack Seal Coat Project 0.00 0.00 427 MSA Funds /General Funds 10.50 1,505.00 Mound /Watermain Loop Island View 0.00 0.00 601 Water Fees Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace 172.00 17,897.00 601 Water Fees Mound /Water System Modeling 21.50 2,382.65 601 Water Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 1.63 172.50 601 Water Fees (1/4) Mound /Water Supply Emergency Consery 0.00 0.00 601 Water Fees Mound /Wellhead Protection Plan 0.00 0.00 601 Water Fees Mound /GIS Updates 0.00 0.00 601 Water Fees 195.13 20,452.15 Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction 2.50 245.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction 2.50 245.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2012 Lift Station Reconstruction 1.00 98.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvement 28.00 2,875.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvement 111.50 12,664.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /I & I Analysis Report 0.00 0.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 1.63 172.50 602 Sewer Fees (1/4) Mound /GIS Updates 0.00 0.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /MCES Flows /City Charges 0.00 0.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2012 MCES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct 55.50 5,459.50 602 Sewer Fees 202.63 21,759.00 Mound /2011 Storm Drainage Improvements 0.00 0.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /WCA Administration 1.50 160.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /SWPPP Update 6.50 740.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 1.63 172.50 675 Storm Water Fees (1/4) Mound /GIS Updates 0.00 0.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2012 Drainage Improvement Project 0.00 0.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /Surface Water Management 20.50 2,843.50 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2013 Storm Drainage Improvements 0.00 0.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements 11.50 1,594.00 675 Storm Water Fees 41.63 5,510.00 03/31/14 YTD Total 2,312.50 233,867.43 -1107- BiIIWBS1 I Project Hours $ Billed C12.037921 Mound /General Engineering 67.00 5,674.78 C12.037929 Mound /WCA Administration 1.50' 160.00 C12.038004 Mound /Water System Modeling 21.50: 2,382.65 C12. 038243 Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps 6.501 690.00 C12.038996 Mound /Development Reviews 4.00' 576.00 C12.039286 Mound /SWPPP Update 6.50' 740.00 C12. 039425 ,Mound _ /MSASystem Coordination 10.50] 1,505.00 C12.100590 Mound /GIS Updates 1.00, 88.00 C12.101482 Mound /SW Island Area 11.001 1,067.50 C12.101514 Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland 1.00' 90.00 C12.101909 Mound /Surface Water Management 20.501 2,843.50 C12.102014 !Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction 2.501' 245.00 C12.103114 Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction 2.50' 245.00 C12.103970 Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall 68.50 7,944.50 C12.104413 Mound /2012 Lift Station Improvement 1.00' 98.00 C12.105545 Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements 348.50' 34,145.50 C12.105673 Mound /2012 MCES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct 55.50 5,459.50 C12.105944 Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvment 28.00 2,875.00 C12.106416' Mound /MCES Projects, Review /Coordination 0.501 71.00 C12.106985 Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements 11.50 1,594.00 C12.107130 Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining W 1,359.50' 134,811.50 C12.107414 Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvment 111.50', 12,664.00 C12.107415 Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace 172.00, 17,897.00 2014 YTD through 1st Quarter -1108- 21312.50 $ 233,867.43 O Z 0 a oW z� o� 0 w m ° W g o p � N 0; U ? a U V) Q N !O M N N (O h Q (O N f0 h 0 f M Q INN — M N N Nr vim v (D V N O p M N O N N h N N h M h M O � h M h W 01 (A O (p tp M (D W � h W Q N (p M O> N Itl N Q N !O M Q (p Q (p v O O O (p N z N W 7 O N O O (O N W N rp OJ Q N f0 � W 1� h N h N O N Q h O T � N N W m tp 1@ (° (p M v W O N t0 M V N P IN Q OJ m M tD M N h ^ M - 0] LL'1 N tD v O m fO h N N P N N INN-- � ^ M VI- 2-8 O_ y O C d N @ 6 CQ d _O QUiQ Q]QQQ � @ M C N D 2 N N ON N N2 y c Ci p E c c c c i c c d O zl liN " EZ oo'o '0000 �c�o"��g "Od > e na`°. nnnn2wxa o'� >jin m3 °c' dLLx'�_EWFEEE EEEE��F@- AUON'?� 0`o O 4 O H O O C7 O O C7 C7 O O O O O O O 0: 1109- m U J y= - N 01 O N P Q (O (O N h h M M M M @ (p uJ � N � N M h O VJ N M N fp O N O h O M M m m M N N 1(] �V M M W N � N y � T C N C W 02 i° ° o 202 J a tN LL Z N J O d d 2i U FW33a t- N m O m W Z N V V (O V N N M N N d M O O 0 M F W M W Z Z W w a aW d 'O m O O O) @ C d U d a Q i O Z N a W o z m N 0 w J G(9 N d O O yma U W N 2 W a w W W O M N N V N N M O N of O -: tN 6 N N N V M O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 N O N N N N W NON O M r M �fJ O r N N M V OM OJrMVOmrNNOJ (OMrMN (O O V Oro 0 � V r N r Yl N M N M N M N O N C4 C O (p V tp f0 N M 07 M N c0 Co O r r N O ro N N M N co ID mcy;rN of t U V N - V N NMN m Co m O 'If N •- N tO M M r O M O r O o o O N o N w N o o v M 0 o MOOOO a in v� o rm r O tN O M (O N M W N M V M t0 M W �O (O (O N Or NM N N 06 L6 tONN O r of (O W N N O [D (O M fN0 M M m V V M O N E Ih N V W Mcn tfJ V tp (D M N N V' V O] N IfJ YJ N N r r M r O O N N M O r r N N h N O O t0 M �O N N N M W W V V N O (O (O V O N r V O N V M M fD N O O_ t0 N M M r N N M V t0 N V v r v N N Mrs " ON V tprN M O] N M n R (p f0 N M N N r N D N M r r ID N 1� N O r N [O M N 0 0 0 @ @ @@ @0 0 0 0 0 0 r O ( C c c c c O M O M r 0 O 0 O ( M m O r V-t0 O .JNO V t0 N O O N O W N N M r N v V N M N OMJ " W NOOMNr V �- O r O a, M 6 r N N N (V N (V ¢ r N N �O r t") w N O � o N W M t0 of ID f0 O �- �o M r co W g N N c 0 M F W M W Z Z W w a aW d 'O m O O O) @ C d U d a Q i O Z N a W o z m N 0 w J G(9 N d O O yma U W N 2 W a w W W O M N N V N N M O N of O -: tN 6 N N N V M O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 N O N N N N W NON O M r M �fJ O r N N M V OM OJrMVOmrNNOJ (OMrMN (O O V Oro 0 � V r N r Yl N M N M N M N O N C4 C O (p V tp f0 N M 07 M N c0 Co O r r N O ro N N M N co ID mcy;rN of t U V N - V N NMN m Co m O 'If N •- N tO M M r O M O r O o o O N o N w N o o v M 0 o MOOOO a in v� o rm r O tN O M (O N M W N M V M t0 M W �O (O (O N Or NM N N 06 L6 tONN O r of (O W N N O [D (O M fN0 M M m V V M O N E Ih N V W Mcn tfJ V tp (D M N N V' V O] N IfJ YJ N N r r M r O O N N M O r r N N h N O O t0 M �O N N N M W W V V N O (O (O V O N r V O N V M M fD N O O_ t0 N M M r N N M V t0 N V v r v N N Mrs " ON V tprN M O] N M n R (p f0 N M N N r N D N M r r ID N 1� N O r N [O M N 0 0 0 @ @ @@ @0 0 0 0 0 0 r O ( C c c c c O M O M r 0 O 0 O ( M m O r V-t0 O .JNO Y N @ C N U oc y o z w m m 'S dod > v a wa. �n a U U m J C O a c N N S E N G@ @ C= G ¢ E v @ 0 0 � � c m a@'i c@ �` o'o E @ z0a.of- Fu i7L �U�U-1110- w O M O fD r N N M N N K N ON r to V NMN L[l V Nro coro our co N M W Y V c0 M V N (O O r (O N O CO N r O (O V M - N U N C 5 @ N C O � '.0 o Z L u o = O a z LL N- N U O N M v o 0 =QOF -U'� 0 O V t0 N O O N O W N N M r N v N N M N OMJ " V N uMi VO' r N M r N �O r t") w N O � o N W M t0 of ID f0 O �- �o Y N @ C N U oc y o z w m m 'S dod > v a wa. �n a U U m J C O a c N N S E N G@ @ C= G ¢ E v @ 0 0 � � c m a@'i c@ �` o'o E @ z0a.of- Fu i7L �U�U-1110- w O M O fD r N N M N N K N ON r to V NMN L[l V Nro coro our co N M W Y V c0 M V N (O O r (O N O CO N r O (O V M - N U N C 5 @ N C O � '.0 o Z L u o = O a z LL N- N U O N M v o 0 =QOF -U'� 0 O ED May 15, 2014 10TU iM] Kandis Hanson, City Manager City Of Mound 2415 Wilshire Blvd Mound, MN 55364 -1687 Dear City Manager Hanson: Each year, the Metropolitan Council prepares population and household estimates as of April I of the previous year. Local governments are invited to review and comment on the preliminary estimates. The Council will certify final estimates by July 15 for state government use in allocating local government aid and street aid. Council staff recently discovered that a manufactured housing park located partly in the City Of Mound closed before April 1, 2013 but was inadvertently included in the preliminary estimates for 2013. As a result, the report sent to you last week slightly overestimated the number of housing units, households, and persons in your community. This letter communicates the Council's revised estimate, which replaces the previous version. We apologize for the inconvenience. The Metropolitan Council estimates that the City Of Mound had 9,421 people and 4,045 households as of April 1, 2013. Household size averaged 2.33 persons per household. As described before, the Council estimates current population and households through changes in the housing stock, occupancy rates and persons per household. Input data sources include housing stock, manufactured home parks, and group quarters data maintained by Metropolitan Council Research, as well as U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey data. For more information on the Council's population estimates model, please visit the Council's website at http: / /stats,metc. state. mn.us /stats /aboutestimates.aspx or contact Matt Schroeder at 651- 602 -1513. Council staff welcomes discussion of the 2013 preliminary estimates. Under Minnesota Statutes 473.24, the Metropolitan Council must receive your comments, questions or specific objections, in writing, by June 24. Please send any written comments or questions to Matt Schroeder, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 North Robert Street, Saint Paul, MN 55 10 1; or by e -mail to matt.schroeder @mete.state.mn.us Sincerely, a Matt Schroeder Senior Researcher w .u_1111- uncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 - Fax (651) 602 -1550 o TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Egua( Opportunity Employer 2013 Annual Population Estimates Mound city, Hennepin County, Minnesota Households: 4,045 Population in Households: 9,416 Average Household Size: Housing Total: 4,376 Population in Group Quarters: 5 Occupancy Rate: 92.44% Total Population: 9,421 03.1:3 Metropolitan Council's Annual Estimates account for housing stock changes since April 1, 2010. These include housing units permitted and other changes. Other changes are due to demolitions, building conversions (units added or lost), city boundary changes (units annexed in or out), and other changes reported by city and township staff. The Council assumes that 85% of multifamily and 95% of single - family units permitted in 2012 were completed and occupiable by April 1, 2013; the remainder are occupiable in the future. Manufactured homes are counted each yearfrom Metropolitan Council surveys of manufactured home park operators and local governments. Other housing (boats, RVs, etc. used as housing) is an estimate from the most recent Census ACS estimates. Housing Stock April 1, 2010 Single- family- detached: 3,273 Townhomes: 253 Duplex, 3 -, 4 -plex units: 103 Multifamily units: 737 Manufactured homes: 13 Other (boats, RVs, etc. as shelter): 0 Housing Total: 4,379 Permitted and Other changes Housing Stock built since 2010 since 2010 April 1, 2013 10 -13 3,270 0 0 253 0 0 103 0 0 737 Single- family- detached: 0 92.38% 3,021 0 4,376 Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate and average household size. Starting with the 2011 -12 cycle, the primary data are the most recent American Community Survey estimates, calculated and adjusted as described in the Council's methodology, available online at http://stats.metc.state.mn.us/stats/aboutestimates.aspx Definitions: A household is a group of people (or one person alone) occupying a housing unit. The number of occupied housing units and the number of households are equivalent. Population in Group Quarters (or institutional housing) is counted separately through an annual Metropolitan Council survey. Housing Stock Occupancy Occupied with Persons Per Population in April 1, 2013 Rate 2013 Households Household 2013 Single- family- detached: 3,270 92.38% 3,021 2.496 7,540 Townhomes: 253 92.38% 234 2.496 584 Duplex, 3 -, 4 -plex units: 103 99.50% 102 3.412 348 Multifamily units: 737 93.38% 688 1.373 944 Manufactured homes: 0 0.00% 0 5.040 0 Other: 0 Counted only if 0 1,800 0 occupied Housing Total: 4,376 Households: 4,045 In Households: 9,416 In Group Qtrs: 5 Total Population: 9,421 Metropolitan Council -1112- 5/15/2014 I Appropriate Country Club attire and soft spikes are required. Rain or Shine Tournament Prevention 2014 H&TONK4 R, e, OPEY SBM Crime Attn: i. Check Mailing Address Email Mailing Address Email Mailing Address Email " Mailing Address Email appropriate box: Enclosed is my team Fee of $560.00. Team Name I will sponsor ____Hotels) @ $150 per Hole. I will help Sponsor the Lunch andfor Dinner. Please Call I will donate Raffle item(s) worth $30 or more. I will donate Silent Auction Item(s) worth $50 or more. 1 am unable to attend. Please accept my donation of $ PROCEEDS BENEFIT DRUG & CRIME PREVENTION PROGRAMS SBM Crime Prevention Fund is a 501(c)3 Organization For mom tr$ - -tion contact PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 22,2014 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page 1. Open meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 0 Q 5. Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims 1439 -1462 *B. Approve minutes: July 8, 2014 regular meeting 1463 -1464 *C. Approve Public Gathering Permit for Full Throttle Fishing Bass 1465 -1466 Tournament at Centerview Beach, with Surfside Beach as alternate, with fees paid: Aug 9, 2014 *D. Approve Resolution Approving Variance for 1784 Jones Lane 1467 -1493 *E. Approve Pay Request No. 9 from GMH Asphalt, Inc. in the amount of 1494 -1495 $160,661.60 for work completed on the 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project, City Project No. PW -13 -01 *F. Adopt Resolution Awarding Contract to Allied Blacktop for the 2014 1496 -1501 Seal Coat Improvement Project in the amount of $84,320, City Project No. PW -14 -07 *G. Adopt Resolution Awarding Contract to Advanced Wall Structures, Inc. in 1502 -1503 the amount of $123,760.00 for the 3025 Island View Drive Emergency Retaining Wall Replacement Project Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 6. Public Hearin A. Action on an Ordinance Amending Chapter 129 of the City Code related to 1504 -1512 swimming pool regulations contained in Sec. 129- 196(b) /. Stacey Kvilvang, representing Ehlers & Associates Financial Advisors, requesting 1513 action on the following resolutions: A. Resolution Providing for the Sale of $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, 1514 -1528 Series 2014 B. Resolution Providing for the Sale of $3,320,000 General Obligation 1529 -1552 Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B Vern Brandenberg, representing Westonka Historical Society, with presentation 9. Laura Cogswell, representing Westonka Dog Days, with appeal of $300 recommended 1553 -1556 fee, to include action on Public Gathering Permit 10. Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administration, requesting action 1557 -1560 on a Resolution to Approve a Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Mound and Westonka Public Schools, ISD 9277 11. Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administration, requesting a discussion 1561 -1564 on official meeting records and minute taking. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: C. Reports: Bolton & Menk Engineering: 2014 YTD 1565 Finance Dept: May 2014 YTD 1566 -1568 Harbor Wine & Spirits: May 2014 1569 D. Correspondence: Letter from Mediacom: June 19, 2014 1570 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 2014 Budget 1571 -1592 Letter from City Manager to City of Spring Park: July 16, 2014 1593 13. Adjourn Note: This is apreliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: u.ww. citvofmound.com. 2014 070714CTYMAN $ 418.50 2014 071014CTYMAN $ 960.00 2014 0717CTYMAN $ 31411.19 2014 BOLTMNK06 -14 $ 60,519.00 2014 072214CITY $ 199,492.09 2014 072214HWS $ 93,131.78 TOTAL 357,932.S6 -1439- Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $418.50 Total $418.50 SE .e CITY OF MOUND 07/07/149: 27 AM _ Page 1 Payments Current Period: July 2014 Batch Name 070714CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $418.50 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $418.50 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 FOSS, ALEXANDER L. _ Cash Payment R 281 - 45210 -34735 Multiple Slip Permits REFUND MULTI SLIP DOCK FEE- A. FOSS $375.00 Invoice 07072014 7/712014 Cash Payment R281- 45210 -34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE -A. FOSS $7.50 Invoice 07072014 7/7/2014 Cash Payment E 10141500 -430 Miscellaneous REFUND OVERDRAFT FEE -A. FOSS $36.00 Invoice 07072014 717/2014 Transaction Date 7/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $418.50 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $36.00 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $382.50 $418.50 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $418.50 Total $418.50 SE .e CITY OF MOUND 07/10/1411:47 AM Page 1 Payments G1 t y Or MOUND Current Period: July 2014 Batch Name 071014CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $960.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $960.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 MWHS BOYS HOCKEY BOOSTERS_ Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies 40 BAGS SALT PELLETS & 40 BAGS $480.00 COARSE SALT- FIRE DEPT Invoice 07102014 7/9/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -210 Operating Supplies 40 BAGS SALT PELLETS & 40 BAGS $480.00 COARSE SALT- CITY HALL Invoice 07102014 7/9/2014 Transaction Date 7/10/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $960.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $480.00 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $480.00 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $960.00 Total $960.00 $960.00 -1441- CITY OF MOUND 07/17114 10:33 AM - Payments Page 1 �' t v' 6�.° li3Elf'ECi Current Period: July 2014 Batch Name 0717CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $3,411.19 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,411.19 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 FRONTIEWCITIZENS COMMUNICA - Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29114 $118.48 Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29114 $67.45 Invoice 07182014 6130/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7129/14 $573.55 Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29114 $418.60 Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29/14 $406.29 Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29/14 $406.29 Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 6130114 TO 7/29/14 $852.32 Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 22242260 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 6/30114 TO 7/29/14 $284.11 Invoice 07182014 6/3012014 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29/14 $142.05 Invoice 07182014 6130/2014 Cash Payment E 10142110 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29/14 $142.05 Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014 Transaction Date 7/1512014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,411.19 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $1,661.19 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $284.11 601 WATER FUND $406.29 602 SEWER FUND $486.05 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $573.55 $3,411.19 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,411.19 Total $3,411.19 -1442- CITY OF MOUND 07/16/14 9:38 AM Page 1 Payments MOUND Current Period: July 2014 Batch Name BOLTMNK06 -14 User Dollar Amt $60,519.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $60,519.00 $0.00 in Balance Refer 1 BOLTONAND MENK, INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 402 - 43120 -300 Professional Srvs NSA SYSTEM UPDATE SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 Invoice 0167811 6130/2014 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0167816 6/3012014 Cash Payment E 401 - 43112 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0167817 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0167808 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0167810 6/30/2014 Transaction Date 7/1512014 Refer 2 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0167813 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 401 -43114 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0167824 6/3012014 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0167823 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA invoice 0167825 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0167826 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 427 - 43121 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0167827 6/3012014 Cash Payment E 401- 43110 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0167828 6130/2014 Cash Payment E 401 - 43101 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0167814 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 401 - 43127 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0167815 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0167807 6/30/2014 SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU JUNE 62014 2012 NORTH ISLAND STREET PROD. PW 12- 01 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 Project PW1201 UPDATE STREET & UTILITY MAPS ENGINEERING THRU JUNE 6 2014 Project 14 -4 STORMWATER UTILITY -SWPPP UPDATE ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 $1,087.50 $435.00 $715.00 $2,417.00 $1,311.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,965.50 GIS UPDATES ENG SVC THRU JUNE 6 2014 $3,093.00 Project 14 -4 2014 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW14- $14,39150 01 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 Project PW 1401 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROV 2014 PROJ $7,133.50 PW14 -04 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 Project PW1404 2014 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 14 -03 $1,609.00 ENG SVC THRU JUNE 6 2014 Project PW1403 2014 BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN $3,542.50 REPLACE PROJ PW 14 -08 ENG SVC THRU JUNE 6 2014 Project PW1408 2014 CRACK & SEALCOAT IMPROV PROD. $1,980.00 PW 14 -06 ENG SVC THRU JUNE 6 2014 Project PW1406 2014 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT $1,084.50 PRO.. PW14 -02 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 Project PW1402 2011 SW ISLAND STREET PROD PW11 -01 $174.00 ENGINEER SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 Project PW1101 2011 HIGHLANDS STREET PROJ PW11 -02 $72.50 ENGINEER SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 Project PW1102 GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JUNE $1,002.50 62014 -1443- CITY OF MOUND 07/16/14 9:38 AM �' -- - -" Page 2 I, Payments Current Period: July 2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs SANITARY SEWER ENGINEERING SVCS $192.00 THRU JUNE 6 2014 Invoice 0167807 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -300 Professional Srvs STORM SEWER ENGINEERING SVCS THRU $81.00 JUNE 6 2014 Invoice 0167807 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -300 Professional Srvs WATER ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JUNE 6 $427.50 2014 Invoice 0167807 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW13- $1,877.50 03 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 Invoice 0167820 6/30/2014 Project PW1303 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW13- $145.00 04 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 Invoice 0167821 6/30/2014 Project PW1304 Cash Payment E 401 - 43213 -303 Engineering Fees 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW13- $1,111.50 05 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 Invoice 0167819 6/30/2014 Project PW1305 Cash Payment G 101 -23302 Lecy 1733 Bluebird PC #14 -0 1733 BLUEBIRD LN- WISENHORN ENG SVCS $72.50 THRU JUNE 6 2014 Invoice 0167809 6/30/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23303 HOPKINS 5030 BARTLETT 5030 BARTLETT- HOPKINS ENG SVCS THRU $72.50 JUNE 6 2014 Invoice 0167809 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -300 Professional Srvs MCES FLOWS- PROJECTS, $870.00 REVIEW /COORDINATION THRU JUNE 6 2014 Invoice 0167822 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -300 Professional Srvs WATER WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN $435.00 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 Invoice 0167812 6/30/2014 Cash Payment E 401- 43113 -300 Professional Srvs 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PRO.. PW13- $15,184.00 01 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014 Invoice 0167813 6/30/2014 Project PW1301 Transaction Date 7/1512014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $54,553.50 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $1,147.50 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $32,735.00 402 MUNICIPAL STAID ST CONSTUCT $1,087.50 427 SEAL COAT FUND $1,980.00 601 WATER FUND $4,405.00 602 SEWER FUND $10,058.50 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $9,105.50 $60,519.00 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $60,519.00 Total $60,519.00 -1444- CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:53 AM _.__._. - -...� Page 1 Payments ,­IT '1' Y` i100UN4) Current Period: July 2014 Batch Name 072214CITY User Dollar Amt $199,492.09 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $199,492.09 $0.00 In Balance Refer 38 AICPA -AMER INST CERT PUB ACC _ _ Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -433 Dues and Subscriptions MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL C. PAUSCHE AUG $235.00 2014 THRU JULY 2015 Invoice 07222014 6/23/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $235.00 Refer 39 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies COFFEE & CREAMER FIREMEN $76.00 Invoice 1184572 7/9/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 Refer 1 BURMA, ORVIN & CAROL _ Cash Payment E 401 -43113 -300 Professional Srvs REIMS REPAIR SPRINKLER SYSTEM $125.00 DAMAGED DURING 2013 STREET PROJ Invoice 07222014 717/2014 Project PWI301 Transaction Date 7/1412014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $125.00 Refer CARQUESTAUTO PARTS (FIRE) _ _2 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair OIL FILTER FOR FIRE STATION GENERATOR $8.38 P Invoice 6974 - 228372 6/13/2014 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair at EDDIES AUTO REPAIR $7.64 Invoice 6974- 229369 6/27/2014 Transaction Date 7/14/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $16.02 Refer 3 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (PANJ _ Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts UPPER CYCLE LURE & NJ CLNR, DIESEL $35.39 KLEEN CETANE- PARKS Invoice 6974 - 229109 6/24/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR PARKS TRAILERS $18.04 Invoice 6974 - 229037 6/24/2014 Transaction Date 7/14/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $53.43 Refer 4 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER RENTAL $15.60 Invoice 00022695 6/30/2014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 2/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.60 Refer 5 DURKIN, DAVID _ Cash Payment E 401 -43113 -300 Professional Srvs RESTACK EXISTING MODULAR WALL- 3012 $4,065.00 DEVON Invoice 07222014 719/2014 Project PW1301 Transaction Date 7/14/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total _ $4,065.00 .. ._... Refer 40 FIRE CATT LLC..... Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic FIRE HOSE TESTING- 16,725 FEET 6 -25 & 6- $4,850.25 26 -14 Invoice MN -4359 6127/2014 PO 24411 r Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,850.25 Refer 41 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS -1445- CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:53 AM - - --- SVC JUNE 2014 Page 2 Payments A Cash Payment G 101 -23301 Perf. Pool - 5024 Tuxedo 14- 524 TUXEDO BLVD POOL COVER VAR Cli,N OF MOUND PLANNING SVCS JUNE 2014 Current Period: July 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -434 Conference & Training COMMUNICATION SKILLS FOR WOMEN $49.00 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE SUBDV PLANNING SEMINAR- K. HANSON 6 -18 -14 ST. CLOUD Invoice 15754161 70/2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $49.00 Refer 7 G & K SERVICES _ $145.25 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 7 -14 -14 LIQUOR STORE $70.88 Invoice 1006403207 7/14/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23303 HOPKINS 5030 BARTLETT Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 7 -07 -14 LIQUOR STORE $76.97 Invoice 1006391837 7/7/2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 7 -07 -14 FIRE DEPT $38.81 Invoice 1006391842 7/7/2014 Transaction Date 7/14/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $186.66 Refer 8 GOVDELIVERY Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -440 Other Contractual Servic EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION MGMT SYSTEM $2,200.00 ANNUAL HOSTING & MTCE FEE Invoice 2465 7/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -440 Other Contractual Servic EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION MGMT SYSTEM- SET $1,000.00 UP FEE Invoice 2465 7/2/2014 _ Transaction Date 7/14/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,200.00 Refer 9 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO _ Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -418 Other Rentals PW RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE - $127.20 JUNE 2014 Invoice 1000047285 7/1/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -418 Other Rentals FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE & $790.26 ADMINISTRATION FEE - JUNE 2014 Invoice 1000047217 7/1/2014 Transaction Date 7/14/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $917.46 Refer 10 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I _ Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -300 Professional Srvs MISC PLANNING SVCS JUNE 2014 $269.75 Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23289 WERTH 5116 WATERBURY 5116 WATERBURY PLANNING SVCS $20.75 TECHNIQUE CONST JUNE 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23298 BENCHMARK -2308 DRIFTW 2308 DRIFTWOOD EXP PERMIT PLANNING $145.25 SVC JUNE 2014 Invoice 007- 005 -70 7/8/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23301 Perf. Pool - 5024 Tuxedo 14- 524 TUXEDO BLVD POOL COVER VAR $103.75 PLANNING SVCS JUNE 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23300 KING2201 CENTERVIEW C 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE SUBDV PLANNING $41.50 SVCS JUNE 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23302 Lacy 1733 Bluebird PC #14 -0 1733 BLUEBIRD- WISENHORN VAR $145.25 PLANNING SVCS JUNE 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/812014 Cash Payment G 101 -23303 HOPKINS 5030 BARTLETT 5030 BARTLETT VAR - HOPKINS PLANNING $124.50 SVCS JUNE 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014 SEEM CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:53 AM - ._._..,` Page 3 Payments "tn of- MOUND Current Period: July 2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23305 4861 SHORELINE #14 -10 & 4861 SHORELINE ERICKSON -EP VAR $124.50 PLANNING SVCS JUNE 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014 Transaction Date 7/14/2014 Refer 11 JANI -KING OF MINNESOTA, INCOR Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice MIN07140470 7/112014 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice MIN07140470 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice MIN07140471 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -460 Janitorial Services Wells Fargo 10100 Total $975.25 MONTHLY CLEANING CITY HALL JULY 2014 $700.00 MONTHLY CLEANING FIRE DEPT JULY 2014 MONTHLY CLEANING CENT BLDG JULY 2014 MONTHLY CLEANING PUB WRKS BLDG JULY 2014 Invoice MIN07140472 7/1/2014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 7/14/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 14 JUBILEE FOODS TABLECLOTH TASTING PROMO EVENT Cash Payment E 609-49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE Invoice 07222014 6/14/2014 LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies AIR SOCCER BALL- PROMO EVENT Invoice 07222014 6/13/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total `. Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies MERCHANDISE DISPLAY BASKET Invoice 07222014 6/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies RETURN MERCHANDISE DISPLAY BASKET Invoice 07222014 6/14/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -430 Miscellaneous EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION BBQ LUNCH DELI, PLATES, LEMONDADE Invoice 07222014 6/19/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies GATORADE, POWERADE FIREMEN Invoice 07222014 6/23/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies TABLECLOTH TASTING PROMO EVENT Invoice 07222014 6/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE Invoice 07222014 6/25/2014 Transaction Date 7114/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 45 KIVISTO, SCOTT Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -438 Licenses and Taxes Invoice 07222014 7115/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Refer 12 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 $700.00 $476.00 $258.83 $2,134.83 $60.00 $2.99 $2.67 -$2.67 $81.81 $39.10 $6.39 $58.00 $248.29 REIMB DRIVERS LICENSE UPGRADE TO $11.0c CLASS B & ENDORSEMENTS- S. KIVISTO Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11.00 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $2,139.30 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 -1447- $285.24 $770.15 CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:53 AM - -"- � 1 Page Payments Current Period: July 2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $142.62 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $313.77 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $1,426.20 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 711/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 42115 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $85.57 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $741.62 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $4,706.46 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $1,055.39 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $5,704.81 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $487.48 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $41.65 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $4,763.51 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $4,421.22 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $7,058.56 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $1,426.20 14 THRU 2 -1 -15 Invoice 47332 7/1/2014 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35,569.75 Refer 13 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T _ Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $621.71 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27816 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $7,211.80 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27816 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $3,063.77 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27816 7/1/2014 -1448- Invoice 1779714 7/3/2014 Cash Payment CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:53 AM $109.89 Page 5 OVERAGE - 6/14/1.4 TO 7113/14 Payments Invoice 1779714 7/3/2014 �x M Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 PW COPIER $2.62 Current Period: July 2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $6,911.15 7/1/2014 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27816 7/1/2014 CABLE CENTENNIAL BLDG FOR UHL Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $397.89 CONTROLS 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice CW25675 6/24/2014 Invoice 27816 7/1/2014 Transaction Date Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $3,485.04 Refer 16 MEDIACOM _ 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27816 7/1/2014 ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 7 -16 -14 THRU 8- Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $7,211.80 15 -14 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27816 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -151 Worker s Camp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $2,287.88 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27816 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $65.65 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27816 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $13.68 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27816 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $621.71 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27816 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101-41500-151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $746.05 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27816 7/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2- $497.37 1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15 Invoice 27816 7/112014 Transaction Date 7/1 512 01 4 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $33,135.50 Refer 15 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - COLOR $103.86 OVERAGE - 6/14/14 TO 7/13/14 Invoice 1779714 7/3/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - BAN $109.89 OVERAGE - 6/14/1.4 TO 7113/14 Invoice 1779714 7/3/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 PW COPIER $2.62 OVERAGE CHG 6 -10 -14 TO 7 -9 -14 Invoice 1777621 7/1/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic CABLE CENTENNIAL BLDG FOR UHL $313.52 CONTROLS Invoice CW25675 6/24/2014 -_ Transaction Date 2/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $529.89 Refer 16 MEDIACOM _ Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -321 Telephone & Cells ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 7 -16 -14 THRU 8- $85.90 15 -14 Invoice 07222014 7/612014 Transaction Date 7115/2014 Refer 17 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SAC CH _ Wells Fargo 10100 Total $85.90 -1449- CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:53 AM - -- Page 6 Payments Current Period: July 2014 Cash Payment G 602 -21825 SAC Deposits SAC CHARGES 2ND QTR 2014 $7,380.45 Invoice 06302014 717/2014 Transaction Date 1/9/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,380.45 Refer 18 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE _ Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS WASTEWATER SERVICES AUGUST 2014 $51,406.04 Invoice 0001036010 7/712014 Transaction Date 1/21/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $51,406.04 Refer 44 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERA Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -433 Dues and Subscriptions JULY 2014 TO JULY 2015 MN MUNICIPAL $1,440.00 BEVERAGE ASSOC ANNUAL DUES Invoice 07222014 7/15/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo - 10100 Total $1,440.00 Refer 19 MINNESOTA UNEMPLOYMENT INS _ Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -140 Unemployment Comp UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 2ND QTR $129.67 2014 E. STRICKLAND Invoice 07222014 7/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -140 Unemployment Comp UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 2ND QTR $1,106.04 2014 K. EZAKI Invoice 07222014 718/2014 Transaction Date 7115/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,235.71 Refer 20 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA _ Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic SURFACE WATER TESTS - MOUND /MCES $1,488.00 SYSTEM OVER CAPACITY- REPORT 7 -1 -14 Invoice 709678 7/3/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic SURFACE WATER TESTS - MOUND /MCES $1,488.00 SYSTEM OVER CAPACITY- REPORT 7 -1 -14 Invoice 709679 7/3/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic SURFACE WATER TESTS - MOUND /MCES $1,488.00 SYSTEM OVER CAPACITY- REPORT 7 -7 -14 Invoice 710129 7/8/2014 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,464.00 Refer 34 MINUTEMAN PRESS _ Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -203 Printed Forms 500 WARNING NOTICE TICKETS- CODE $204.71 ENFORCEMENT Invoice 16269 7/3/2014 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20431 Refer 21 MNSPECT _ Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees JUNE 2014 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES $8,296.19 Invoice 6339 7/8/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -20800 Due to Other Governments JUNE 2014 - ELECTRICAL STATE $125.00 SURCHARGE FEE CREDIT Invoice 6339 7/8/2014 Cash Payment R 101- 42000 -32220 Electrical Permit Fee JUNE 2014 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION - $399.00 PERMIT FEE CREDITS Invoice 6339 7/8/2014 Transaction Date 7115/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,772.19 Refer 22 MOUND FIRE RELIEFASSOCIATIO _ -1450- CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:53 AM Page 7 IL Payments CITY C1FhA0UKD Current Period: July 2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib JULY 2014 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION $12,250.00 CONTRIBUTION Invoice 07222014 7/1/2014 Transaction Date 7115/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,250.00 Refer 23 MULCH STORE, THE _ Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -232 Landscape Material HONEY GOLD CONTRACTOR MULCH FOR $1,073.00 PARKS -29 CUBIC YDS Invoice 15689 6130/2014 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,073.00 Refer 25 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -200 Office Supplies FILE FOLDERS, PENS, COPY PAPER, $82.79 LABELS, TAPE Invoice 718678595001 7/2/2014 PO 24412 Cash Payment E22242260-210 Operating Supplies 9V BATTERIES $17.53 Invoice 718678595001 7/2/2014 PO 24412 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.32 Refer 24 OFFICEDEPOT _ Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -200 Office Supplies 9 X 12 ENVELOPES, WRITING PADS, LID $33.56 PAPER CX Invoice 718423028001 7/1/2014 PO 24379 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 718423028001 711/2014 PO 24379 Transaction Date 2/4/2014 Refer 42 OFFICEDEPOT Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 718924731001 7/7/2014 PO 24380 Cash Payment E 101- 41410 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 718924731001 717/2014 PO 24380 Cash Payment G 101 -22802 Festival Invoice 718924731001 717/2014 PO 24380 BLACK, YELLOW, CYAN, MAGENTA TONER $218.34 CARTRIDGES- PUB WKS Project 14 -5 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $251.90 COLORED COPY PAPER, HIGHLIGHTERS $23.04 DYMO LABELS $15.89 NAME TAGS - SPIRIT OF THE LAKES $24.58 FESTIVAL Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $63.51 Refer 26 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS Cash Payment E602- 49450 -322 Postage JUNE 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $326.08 Invoice 140630 715/2014 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute JUNE 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,751.52 PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 140630 7/5/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute JUNE 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,751.52 PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 140630 7/5/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -322 Postage Invoice 140630 7/5/2014 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Refer 27 ORONO, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -450 Board of Prisoners Invoice 20140106 6/30/2014 JUNE 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $326.08 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,15520 HENNEP CTY JAIL CHARGES- PER DIEM $100.55 FEES MAY 2014 -1451- CITY OF MOUND Payments "VIN OF YWILI€ G 07/17/14 9:53 AM Page 8 Current Period: July 2014 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.55 Refer 28 POTTS, KENNETH N. P.A Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -304 Legal Fees Invoice 07222014 7/1/2014 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Refer 29 STANCHFIELD, RONALD Cash Payment E 281- 45210 -331 Use of personal auto 2ND QTR 2014 PROSECUTION SVCS $12,500.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,500.00 REIMB MILEAGE- DOCK INSPECTION 6 -11 $47.60 THRU 7 -3 - R. STANCHFIELD Invoice 07222014 7/7/2014 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47.60 Refer 30 SUN NEWSPAPERS -HWS ACCT, Invoice 116024 _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -328 Employment Advertising SALESCLERK HELP WANTED AD- HWS 6 -7- Invoice 116719 7/3/2014 14 Invoice 232704 617/2014 719/2014 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer_ 43 SUN PATRIOTNEWSPAPER -CITY _ E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 101- 41410 -351 Legal Notices Publishing ELECTION - CANDIDATE FILING DATES - E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 115844 PUBLIC NOTICE 7 -12 -14 Invoice 119563 7/12/2014 Refer 46 Cash Payment E 10142400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing PUB NTCE SWIMMING POOL REGS ZONING AMENDMENT 7 -12 -14 Invoice 119564 7112/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 31 TRADEMARK TITLE SVCS, INC. Cash Payment R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY CREDIT- 2137 NOBLE. TRADEMARK TITLE Invoice 07222014 7/1412014 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 35 TRUE VALUE HWS Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 116024 6/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 116719 7/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 116874 719/2014 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Refer 36 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 115842 6/7/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 115844 6/712014 Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Refer 46 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow Invoice 115805 6/6/2014 CLEANING SUPPLIES GE 6 PK FLD LIGHTS, 13W CFL, PERMATEX TRASH BAGS, DOG TREATS $111.00 $111.00 $23.13 $30.84 $53.97 $529.60 $529.60 $28.83 $48.06 $24.56 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $101.45 ELECTRIC BALLAST $69.98 PIPE WRENCH, THREAD SEAL, GAS TAPE $31.47 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $101,45 FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO $21.99 REIMB- BROOM -1452- CITY OF MOUND 07/17/14 9:53 AM -- - -�,,, Page 9 Payments C Y OF MOUND Current Period: July 2014 Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO $32.34 REIMB- OUTLETS FOR TENTS Invoice 115834 6/6/2014 Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO $20.37 REIMB- CLEANER Invoice 115843 6/7/2014 Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO $28.97 REIMB- APPL CORD, FOIL TAPE Invoice 115845 61712014 Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO $11.98 REIMB- HD STAPLES Invoice 115846 6/7/2014 Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO $39.62 REIMB- TERMOMETER, DUCT TAPE, BLEACH, SCOUR PAD Invoice 115847 6/7/2014 Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO $12.48 REIMB- PAPER TOWEL HOLDER, FOAM MOUNT TAPE Invoice 115848 6/7/2014 Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO $6.99 REIMB- DROP OUTLET 't.. Invoice 115851 6/7/2014 Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO $17.99 REIMB- ANTENNA Invoice 115854 6/7/2014 Transaction Date 7/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $192.73 Refer 37 TRUE VALUE, MOUND(PWPKS) _ Cash payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials FUNNEL $5.58 Invoice 115622 6/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -230 Shop Materials TUNG SCRIBER & MAGNET $9.49 Invoice 115659 6/3/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -409 Other Equipment Repair LAWN MOWER BLADE SHARPENING, PVC $13.39 PIPE Invoice 115678 6/3/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies DEHUMIDIFIER, BOX FAN $282.99 Invoice 115678 6/312014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -230 Shop Materials WIRE BRUSH, CROSS PEIN HAMMER, FHP V $35.97 BELT Invoice 115714 6/4/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply ROUNDUP SPRAY $54.99 Invoice 115809 6/6/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CONCRETE FORM TUBE $29.98 Invoice 115892 6/9/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair[Maint Supply AMONIA, KEY RING $15.52 Invoice 115902 6/9/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, BITS $7.97 Invoice 115948 6110/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, BITS $2.65 Invoice 115970 6/11/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -232 Landscape Material 60LB CONCRETE MIX $27.45 Invoice 115970 6/11/2014 -1453- Invoice 116169 6/17/2014 Cash Payment CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:53 AM $43.71 Invoice 116347 6/23/2014 Page 10 Invoice 116185 Payments Project 14 -3 $4.49 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, APPL BULB, 60W $9.38 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply BULBS $7.49 Invoice 116221 6119/2014 Invoice 28154 Current Period: July 2014 E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies LYSOL WIPES $6.99 Invoice 116016 6/12/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms COWHIDE GLOVES $4.58 Invoice 116016 6/12/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply SELECT SHOCK $20.97 Invoice 116035 6/12/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -220 Repair /Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, PINE SOL $1165 Invoice 116050 6/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -430 Miscellaneous SCISSORS- RIBBON CUTTING CEREMONY $23.95 Invoice 116063 6/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -232 Landscape Material BLOOM BOOSTER- HANGING BASKETS $12.99 Invoice 116064 6/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS $6.99 Invoice 116160 6/17/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply SUMP PUMP, CONNECTOR, BUSHING, EYE $188.96 LAG BT- PARKS Invoice 116169 6/17/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials SOAP, SPONGE, ACID BRUSH, AJAX, $43.71 Invoice 116347 6/23/2014 SIMPLE GREEN CLEANERS Invoice 116185 6/18/2014 Project 14 -3 $4.49 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, APPL BULB, 60W $9.38 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply BULBS $7.49 Invoice 116221 6119/2014 Invoice 28154 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 6 MIL BULK SHEETING $67.98 Invoice 116244 6/19/2014 RAMP Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies 4 MIL BULK SHEETING $29.98 Invoice 116250 6/19/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -210 Operating Supplies APPL CORD, ELEC TAPE $17.48 Invoice 116260 6/19/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies SUMP PUMP, CONNECTOR, BUSHING, $456.61 GARDEN HOSE AMONIA- PARKS Invoice 116283 6/20/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials CLOTHESLINE $4.49 Invoice 116347 6/23/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials CLOTHESLINE $4.49 Invoice 116348 6/23/2014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply EXT MOUNT TAPE $7.49 Invoice 116404 6/2412014 Invoice 28154 Cash Payment E 285- 46388 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CLEANER & SCRUB SPONGE- PARKING $18.98 E 101 - 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance PREVENTATIVE MTCE CONTRACT- CITY RAMP Invoice 116430 6/25/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials CREDIT ADJ -$1.10 Invoice 063014 6/30/2014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 7/1512014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total . $1,424.55 Refer 32 UHL COMPANY Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -402 Building Maintenance PREVENTATIVE MTCE CONTRACT- FIRE $531.25 DEPT 3RD QTR 2014 Invoice 28154 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance PREVENTATIVE MTCE CONTRACT- CITY $531.25 HALL 3RD QTR 2014 Invoice 28154 7/1012014 -1454- Transaction Date 7/1512014 Refer 33 XCEL ENERGY CITY OF MOUND 07/17/14 9:53 AM Page 11 Payments Current Period: July 2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,062.50 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities 5341 MAYWOOD RD STREET LIGHTS- 6 -3 -14 $4,989.83 TO 7 -2 -14 Invoice 418564263 7/3/2014 Transaction Date 7/1512014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,989.83 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $60,937.85 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $32,302.15 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $932.97 285 MOUND HRA $74.28 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $4,190.00 601 WATER FUND $10,891.72 602 SEWER FUND $77,717.31 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $12,380.16 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $65.65 $199,492.09 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $199,492.09 Total $199,492.09 -1455- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2014 07/17/14 9:47 AM Page 1 Batch Name 072214HWS User Dollar Amt $93,131.78 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $93,131.78 $0.00 In Balance Refer 2 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $53.60 Invoice 466419217 7/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $79.00 Invoice 388419505 7/1412014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $132.60 Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $159.00 Invoice 385418412 7/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 385418412 7/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $165.70 Invoice 387418506 7/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 387418506 7/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $87.60 Invoice 385418603 7/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 385418603 7/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $119.15 Invoice 387418805 717/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 387418805 717/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $37.95 Invoice 385419103 711012014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 385419103 7/10/2014 Transaction Date 7/1612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $574.40 Refer 3 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $277.35 Invoice 57172 711/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $277.35 Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS, SUPPLIES $49.67 Invoice 90497300 7/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $22.00 Invoice 90497300 7/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE SHOT GLASSES $117.00 Invoice 90497300 7/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCH- 3 QT COOLER $85.20 Invoice 90461100 7/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS $47.00 Invoice 90461100 7/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCH- CORKSCREWS, JIGGERS, FLASKS $82.50 Invoice 90504000 7/14/2014 -1456- CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:47 AM Page 2 Payments Current Period: July 2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $29.00 Invoice 90504000 7/14/2014 Refer Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $130.89 Invoice 90461000 7/7/2014 BEER Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $35.00 Invoice 43793300 7/7/2014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,188.79 Invoice 43793300 7/7/2014 7/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,021.70 Invoice 43882600 7/11/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $12.30 Invoice 43882600 7/11/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,821.05 Refer 5 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN _ 7/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $127.15 Invoice 145761 7/2/2014 $2,135.90 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $979.10 Invoice 145762 7/2/2014 E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $166.35 Invoice 148712 7/16/2014 Transaction Date Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $749.18 Invoice 148713 7/16/2014 _ Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,021.78 Refer 6 BLU SKY PUBLISHING _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising 114 PAGE AD JULY 2014 WEST LAKE $140.00 BUSINESS PUBLICATION Invoice 16119 6/30/2014 Transaction Date 7/1612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $140.00 Refer 7 COCA COLA BOTTLING- MIDWEST _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX Invoice 0138127406 7/10/2014 $185.44 Transaction Date 7/1612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total. $185.44 Refer 8 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $650.00 Invoice 1092741 7/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $49.00 Invoice 94483 7/11/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $699.00 Refer 9 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,753.15 Invoice 759774 7/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,135.90 Invoice 760643 7/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $73.80 I Invoice 760644 7/15/2014 Transaction Date 7/1612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,962.85 Refer 10 EXTREME BEVERAGE _ -1457- _ CITY OF MOUND 07/17/14 R47 AM Page 3 \ \ Payments Current Period: July 2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $179.00 Invoice 991510 71912014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $179.00 Refer_ 17 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA - Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $344.00 Invoice 169193 7/14/2014 Refer 18 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $4.50 Invoice 169193 7/1412014 Invoice 2239926 7/15/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $348.50 Refer 11 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,309.00 Invoice 711509 7/9/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,309.00 Refer 13 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $80.00 Invoice 2225996 7/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $237.00 Invoice 2239865 7/3/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $317.00 Refer 18 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,41725 Invoice 2239926 7/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $197.60 Invoice 2239927 7/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $59.00 Invoice 2229746 7/11/2014 Transaction Date 7116/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,555.85 Refer 12 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $25.50 Invoice 2239883 7/812014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $77.60 Invoice 2239883 7/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,291.47 Invoice 2239882 7/8/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,394.57 Refer 15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,701.43 Invoice 1891648 7/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $4,927.10 Invoice 1891649 7/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $20.99 Invoice 1891650 7/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $64.50 Invoice 1891651 7/212014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,714.02 Refer 14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ -1458- CITY OF MOUND 07/171149:47 AM Page 4 pp'b�,� {�� Payments Lei E S� E11� MOUND Current Period: July 2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $60.50 Invoice 1895766 7/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $7,358.89 Invoice 1895762 7/9/2014 DELIVERY SVC 6 -30 -14 $92.80 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,917.40 Invoice 1895763 7/9/2014 Refer 20 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $36.00 Invoice 1895765 7/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $41.98 Invoice 1895764 7/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -412 Building Rentals AUG 2014 COMMON AREA MTCE & Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$1.38 Invoice 625000 7/3/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $11.73 Invoice 623951 6/26/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $188.00 Invoice 1896278 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $36.00 Invoice 625184 7/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT -$6.08 Invoice 625185 7/712014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $84.00 Invoice 625186 77712014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$5.38 Invoice 625187 7/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$9.00 Invoice 625188 7/7/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,449.20 Refer 16 LAKE MONSTER BREWING _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $260.00 Invoice 1506 7/312014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $260.00 Refer 19 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 6 -19 -14 $306.25 Invoice 30394 6119/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 6 -26 -14 $219.45 Invoice 30419 6126/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 6 -30 -14 $92.80 Invoice 30430 6/30/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $618.50 Refer 20 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 6 -2 -14 $51.30 Invoice 928025749 6/22/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $51.30 Refer 21 MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSOC _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -412 Building Rentals AUG 2014 COMMON AREA MTCE & $1,045,50 INSURANCE HWS Invoice 08012014 811/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Far— 10100 Total $1,045.50 -1459- CITY OF MOUND 07/17/14 9:47 AM ...\ Page 5 Payments Current Period: July 2014 Refer 22 PARLEY LAKE WINERY _ FREIGHT Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $411.00 Invoice 14075 712/2014 E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $411.00 24 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE CO_MPA_ E 60949750 -265 Freight FREIGHT _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $790.81 Invoice 8456845 7/14/2014 E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT Invoice 8455990 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $12.50 Invoice 8456845 7/14/2014 Wells Fargo Refer 26 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Transaction Date 7116/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $803.31 Refer 23 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Invoice 2631098 7/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $285.39 Invoice 8456154 7/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8456154 7/8/2014 25 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8455895 7/7/2014 $663.10 Cash Payment E 60949750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8455895 7/7/2014 E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT Invoice 8455990 7/8/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo Refer 26 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2631098 7/2/2014 7/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2631097 7/2/2014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 2631099 7/2/2014 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2631099 7/2/2014 $2.25 $205.48 $7.00 -$7.84 10100 Total $492,28 $407.80 $348.30 $41.95 $56.00 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $854.05 Refer 25 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $663.10 Invoice 2633718 7/912014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,092.85 Invoice 2633719 7/912014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $151.75 Invoice 2633718 7/912014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,907.70 Refer 27 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,200.75 Invoice 1180422 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,152.48 Invoice 1180423 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $36.14 Invoice 1180424 7/10/2014 -1460- CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:47 AM $ Page 6 Payments Current Period: July 2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $569.03 Invoice 1178702 713/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,792.00 Invoice 1178703 7/3/2014 Transaction Date 7/1612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,750.40 Refer 28 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $62.99 Invoice 835600 7/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $181.05 Invoice 835601 7/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $91.40 Invoice 835602 7/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $110.00 Invoice 835603 7/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,054.45 Invoice 835604 7/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $144.05 Invoice 00751247 7/15/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,229.86 29 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ _Refer kll Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $10,353.81 Invoice 834044 71812014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $340.00 Invoice 828375 6/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $527.50 Invoice 833576 7/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEET $123.00 Invoice 833576 7/3/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,344.31 30 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $316.00 Invoice 0101967 7/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $10.00 Invoice 0101967 7/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $212.00 Invoice 0102309 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 0102309 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $212.00 Invoice 0102310 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0102310 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa SODA $7150 Invoice 0102311 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 r Invoice 0102311 7/10/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $836.00 Refer 31 WINE COMPANY - - -1461- _ CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:47 AM _I Page 7 ', Payments 1 Off°'I CTNr Current Period: July 2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $188.00 Invoice 365856 7/312014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $4.20 Invoice 365856 7/3/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $448.00 Invoice 366224 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $8.40 Invoice 366224 7/10/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $648.60 Refer 32 WINEMERCHANTS _- Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $891.00 Invoice 509850 7/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,409.01 Invoice 510482 7/9/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,300.01 Refer 33 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,106.75 Invoice 1090256646 7/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $304.80 Invoice 1090256647 7/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $43.00 Invoice 1090256648 7/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $80.00 Invoice 1090256649 7/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $246.00 Invoice 1090253040 7/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,497.60 Invoice 1090253039 7/9/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,278.15 Refer 34 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT - Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,015.96 Invoice 1080201789 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,003.84 Invoice 1080201788 7/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $622.00 Invoice 1080198939 7/212014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $577.40 Invoice 1080198938 7/2/2014 Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,219.20 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $93,131.78 $93,131.78 Pre - Written Check $0,00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $93,131.78 Total $93,131,78 -1462- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 8, 2014 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, July 8, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Keiji Gillispie and Ray Salazar Members absent: None Others present: Fin Dir /Clerk/Treasurer /Acting City Manager Catherine Pausche, John Beise, Theresa Malloy, Jay Green, Andy Weigman, Dedra Brey, Art Saunders, Peter Meyer, Cindy Pugh, Sheriff Richard Stanek Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda Pausche asked for item 7 on the agenda to be removed and item 7A to be added. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $214,666.73. B. Approve minutes of the June 24, 2014 regular meeting. C. Approve final pay request from Precision Seal Coating, Inc. in the amount of $9,407.50 for work completed on the 2014 Crack Seal Project, City Project No. PW- 14 -06. D. Approve water tower lease agreement with Verizon Wireless. E. Approve amendment to Temporary Sign Permit for Spirit of the Lakes Festival for additional banner locations with fee waived. F. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -52: RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES AS RECOMMENDED FOR THE PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTION — AUGUST 12, 2014 AND NOVEMBER 4, 2104. 1463- Mound City Council Minutes — July 8, 2014 Gillispie questioned the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) water level prediction and when it will get below 930.0. Green said the three day requirement was written in the ordinance so that it could be automatically lifted without board action. Hanus said that also gives greater assurance the issue is resolved. Hanus said the probability of a significant rain event should be considered. Weigman suggested enforcement should be situational and only look at the bay that the event is in. Weigman requested the Mound Council make a statement about under what conditions a waiver should be granted. Salazar does not want to grant a waiver. Gillispie said if the direction of decline continues, she is in support of a waiver. Gesch said she wants to be consistent for all users, but is flexible on giving up on the three day requirement. Wegscheid agreed. 8. Information /Miscellaneous Mayor Hanus invited State Representative Cindy Pugh to address the Council. Pugh thanked the Council for all of the efforts regarding the waste water issue, particularly the responsiveness and communication efforts. A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager: Hanus said he sent a letter to The Laker indicating he would not seek reelection. Hanus summarized the contents of the letter and said the City's future is bright and positive. Hanus said he had done much of what he wanted to do and it is time for fresh blood and energy. Hanus wanted people to know in advance so they could consider running for office. Salazar thanked Hanus for his service. Pausche stated that candidate filing will take place from July 29th through August 12th at City Hall. B. Minutes: Planning Commission: June 3, 2014 C. Reports: D. Correspondence: 2014 Spirit of the Lakes Festival Schedule 9. Adjourn MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Wegscheid, to adjourn at 8:33 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1464- Mayor Mark Hanus 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith Date: 7/17/2014 Re: July 22, 2014 City Council Consent Agenda Item — Public Gathering Permit Overview. Full Throttle Fishing has submitted a Public Gathering Permit application to hold a fishing tournament at Centerview Park on Saturday, August 9, 2014 from sunrise to 4:30 p.m. They are also requesting approval to hold the event at Surfside Park, as an alternate site, if Centerview Park is not usable due to high water and park conditions. Comments. • The City Council has granted Public Gathering Permit approval for this event for a number of years. • The applicant has paid the application fee and damage deposit. • Expected attendance is 75 persons. • The applicant has indicated that they have applied for the permits required by the Hennepin County Sheriff and Water Patrol and have been issued a permit from the DNR. RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends approval of the requested permit subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of all required public agency permits. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for contacting the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) prior to the event regarding the wake restriction on Lake Minnetonka due to high water conditions. Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining a temporary sign permit from the City for the placement of event signage and banners which shall be subject to the regulations contained in Mound City Code Chapter 119. -1465- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS. Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit ��toinsure cleaning up of the park area. PERMIT FEE: $300/D TO 6 0/DAY* t/ ilk. DAMAGE DEPOSIT $50 O $1000 /DAY* 7 i 1 *Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements. Date(s) of Use %�c 1 2-0 1 /y Viu ✓ Area to be Used _ l F,'t -4 � f og u� —T — /Sari �_ 45 �qs { Time Frame Intended Use 70 Expected Attendance TS titer o, S Organization FA Representative's Namea �a JG�vi't 2 C/ Address � 6HfT g r" ' kJa Ct P✓i..2C Telephone No. Home: 7 6 ?- q91 -' jr08 Drivers License Number Fire Dept., -1466- 7�— nA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANTS: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING: BACKGROUND Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant July 16, 2014 14 -13 Variance — house addition /remodel project Jason and Christine Baker 1784 Jones Lanes (PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -22 -0036) Low Density Residential R -1 Single Family Residential The applicants, Jason and Christine Baker, are requesting variance approval for a house addition /remodel project at 1784 Jones Lane. Variance approval is requested to allow a front setback of 27.54 feet. The City Code requires a 30 -foot front setback for a principal structure. SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION The 12,402 square foot property is located on the south side of Jones Lane and has frontage on Lake Minnetonka. The property currently includes an existing split entry, single - family home that was constructed in 1975. The requested variance is for a 13' x 23' addition to the front (north) of the existing home and 6' x 24' expansion to the attached garage. The proposed additions will match the elevations of the existing home. The applicants are proposing interior remodeling as part of the project including renovation of the existing master bedroom /closet /bath. They are also undertaking exterior fagade improvements. Details about the project are contained in Planning Report No. 14 -13 and the applicants' submitted application and supporting materials. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their July 15, 2014 meeting and voted six in favor and one (1) opposed, to recommend Council approval of the requested variance, as recommended Staff, subject to conditions. Details of the Planning Commission's review are included in the draft July 15, 2014 Planning Commission meeting minute excerpts which have been included as an attachment. As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, Staff prepared the attached resolution for City Council consideration. -1467- RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR 1784 PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -13 PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -22 -0036 WHEREAS, the applicants, Jason and Christine Baker, are requesting variance approval for a house addition and remodel project at 1784 Jones Lane; and WHEREAS, the 12,402 square foot property is located on the south side of Jones Lane and has frontage on Lake Minnetonka. The property currently includes an existing split entry, single - family home that was constructed in 1975. The requested variance is for a 13' x 23' addition to the front (north) of the existing home and 6'x 24' expansion to the attached garage. The proposed additions will match the elevations of the existing home. The applicants are proposing interior remodeling as part of the project including renovation of the existing master bedroom /closet/bath. They are also undertaking exterior fagade improvements; and WHEREAS, details about the project are contained in Planning Report No. 14 -13 and the applicants' submitted application and supporting materials; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R -1 single - family residential. Section 129 -100 of the City Code contains the regulations for the R -1 district; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. ; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a meeting held on July 15, 2014; and WHEREAS, a majority of the Planning Commission voted to recommend Council approval of the variance, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its July 22, 2014 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. The lot is irregular shaped and includes an angled front lot line. 3. The applicant has minimized the variance as a large majority of the project meets the minimum 30 -foot setback requirement with only a small portion, about 50 square feet, needing variance approval. 4. The variance is requested due to circumstances unique to the property and not due to the actions of the applicant who purchased the property in 1999. 5. The placement of the house and the applicable setbacks that apply to the subject property affects where additions can take place. The applicants have proposed -1469- the additions in the area of the property that can accommodate the addition and that is practical based on the current layout of their home. 6. Including the proposed new additions, the house will be located approximately 40 feet from the curb line abutting the south side of Jones Lane. Improvements to update a single - family home, constructed in 1975, is reasonable and will not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance is approved. 3. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall ensure that runoff from the roof does not drain on to neighboring properties. 5. The eaves will be modified in impacted areas to meet the regulation that allows eaves to extend into setback areas no more than 2 feet. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 9. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant will be required to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. -1470- 10. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) or 3 feet above a wetland. The RPFE for Lake Minnetonka is 933.0. 11. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT Lakeshore setback or 100 -year floodplain areas. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property: (to be inserted) Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of July, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -1471- MINUTE EXCERPTS 2014 JULY 15, Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry (7:02), Kelvin Retterath (7:03), Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: David Goode. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Secretary Jill Norlander. BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 14 -13 Variance Property -1784 Jones Lane Applicant —Jason and Christine Baker Smith introduced the variance request for a house addition /remodel project. Variance approval is requested to allow a front setback of 27.54 feet instead of the required 30 feet. The 12,402 square foot Oopert`jz is ocated on tgiheDut side of Jon s Lane and has frontage on Lake Minnetonka. The rquestd v riarr�e is fora ' ' x3' addition #o the front (north) of the existing home and a 6 X,'4,%, expansion to laeJattach garage. Staff is recommending approval of the request with 11 conditions and 7 findings of fact. Wegscheid agrees with staff assessment all the way through. Retterath asked about the inside wall. Jason Baker, 1784 Jones Lane, said that there was reportedly a fire that occurred before they owned the property. The wall is about 17 to 18 feet from the door and delineates a storage room /workshop area. It makes the front of the garage about 24 wide by 18.5 deep. Retterath asked about the reason for 6 foot garage expansion. Why not build it conforming? Baker said that they put in a dormer above the garage for aesthetics for the neighbors and they are changing the pitch of garage to match house. The resulting 3/12 pitch would cause problems with snow. Retterath stated that, if garage wall and dormer was set behind the 30' line, the pitches could remain the same. The eaves would be a little higher and the dormer would be 6 inches higher He is struggling with the garage when it could be tucked behind the setback line. -1472- Discussion Retterath — look at floor plan of house addition, the angle of the lot is working against us. The interior layout of stairs, everything is snuggled in just right. It's the growth of the garage that bothers him. Why have setbacks if we don't enforce them. It's all reasonable but just because it's reasonable doesn't mean it should be allowed. Irregularity of the lot has nothing to do with the garage size issue. MOTION by Bergquist, second by Gawtry, to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by Staff subject to conditions 1 -11 and findings of fact 1 -7. MOTION carried. Voting for: Penner, Bergquist, Gawtry, Smieja, Stone and Wegscheid Voting against: Retterath ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Penner, second by Gawtry, to adjourn at 7:22 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander -1473- nAiL TY. M N _....... PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANTS: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING: Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant July 11, 2014 (revised July 17, 2014 to correct typos) 14 -13 Variance — house addition /remodel project Jason and Christine Baker 1784 Jones Lanes (PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -22 -0036) Low Density Residential R -1 Single Family Residential _� ; BACKGROUND The applicants, Jason and Christine Baker, are requesting variance approval for a house addition /remodel project at 1784 Jones Lane. Variance approval is requested to allow a front setback of 27.54 feet. SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION The 12,402 square foot property is located on the south side of Jones Lane and has frontage on Lake Minnetonka. The property currently includes an existing split entry, single - family home that was constructed in 1975. The requested variance is for a 13' x 23' addition to the front (north) of the existing home and 6' x 24' expansion to the attached garage. The proposed additions will match the elevations of the existing home. The applicants are proposing interior remodeling as part of the project including renovation of the existing master bedroom /closet /bath. They are also undertaking exterior facade improvements. Applicants have indicated that a separate permit application for exterior remodeling /siding may be submitted. Specific details about the project are contained in the applicants' submitted application and supporting materials. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. -1474- (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, 'Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS The variance application was submitted on July 1, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be July 2, 2014. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission agenda on July 11, 2014 to inform them of the variance request. Members are advised that the applicants discussed the project with the abutting neighbors on the east and west sides. Both neighbors contacted Staff to inform the City that they were in favor of the project. A copy of the information received from the abutting neighbors has been included as attachments to the Planning Report. -1475- STAFF /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved departments, consultants and agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below. Kandis Hanson, City Manager Melissa Manderschied, City Attorney Ray Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Scott Qualle, MnSpect Building Official Joey Handtmann, MCWD District Representative Responded that she has no comments. The applicants' narrative said the cul -de -sac was vacated and the street was converted to a through street in 1975. Please confirm if information is accurate. Hennepin County property information site indicates the most recent purchase was in 1999. If information in applicants' narrative is correct, then practical difficulties test seems to be met. Additional Notes: The street vacation took place in 1975. Staff confirmed that the applicants' purchased the property in 1999. Agree with comments from City Attorney. Responded that he has no issues. After reviewing the plans for 1784 Jones Lane, it would appear no MCWD rules would be triggered unless over 50 cubic yards of soil were to be excavated /used as fill. If that was the case, then an erosion control permit would be required. DISCUSSION L. The regulations for the R -1 zoning district are contained in Sec. 129 -100. The setback requirements that apply to the subject lot, which is a lot of record, are summarized as follows: Front: 30 feet Side: 10 feet /6 feet Rear: 50 feet from 929.4 ordinary high water mark for Lake Minnetonka 2. The shape of the lot was modified following the vacation of a portion of the cul de sac in 1975 which added property to the subject lot in the NW corner. -1476- 3. The lot is irregularly shaped as it has an angled front property line along Jones Lane. 4. As can be seen on the submitted survey, the majority of the project meets the 30 -foot minimum setback requirement. Information from the applicant estimates that the amount of the project that requires variance approval is approximately 50 SF (40 feet for the attached garage addition portion and 10 square feet for the house addition portion.) Information on the application requests a variance of 2.46 feet from the required 30- foot requirement to allow a 27.54 foot front setback for the proposed house addition project. This dimension is located at the NE corner of the "house portion" of the addition and stated on the survey along with an arrow depicting same. 6. As can be seen on the survey, there is about 10 feet of right -of -way between the property line and the constructed road. With the proposed additions, the house will be located approximately 40 feet from the curb line abutting Jones Lane. The applicant has indicated that the hardcover amount shown on the application was based on the 30 percent allowance and was under the regulations. The application also shows the lot size at 12,750 SF while the information on the survey states that the lot, as measured to the 929.4 ordinary high water mark is 12,702 SF. Members are advised that the subject property is a lot of record and therefore eligible for 40 percent hardcover allowance subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129- 385(g)(2). Hardcover has not been field verified. However, Staff is confident the subject lot, with the proposed additions, is consistent with the applicable hardcover provisions. 8. The submitted plans show three foot (3) foot eaves on portions of the project so as to match the existing house. Code allows eaves to extend up to two (2) feet into setback areas. Applicant has advised that the eaves will be modified in impacted areas so as to meet the code. 9. While the existing garage portion of the building has approximately 35 feet of depth, applicant has indicated that the actual space for vehicle parking is approximately 18 -19 feet as there is a wall separating this area that was not shown on the submitted plans. 10. It is anticipated that the applicants will provide additional information regarding the existing layout of the house and how the proposed additions have been programmed to update the house. STAFF RECOMMENDATION -1477- In accordance with City Code Sec. 129 -39 (a), Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the requested variance subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance is approved. 3. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall ensure that runoff from the roof does not drain on to neighboring properties. 5. The eaves will be modified in impacted areas to meet the regulation that allows eaves to extend into setback areas no more than 2 feet. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 9. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant will be required to contact the MCWD related to th a new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 10. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) or 3 feet above a wetland. The RPFE for Lake Minnetonka is 933.0. -1478- 11. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT Lakeshore setback or 100 -year floodplain areas. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered. 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. The lot is irregular shaped and includes an angled front lot line. 3. The applicant has minimized the variance as a large majority of the project meets the minimum 30 -foot setback requirement with only a small portion, about 50 square feet, needing variance approval. 4. The variance is requested due to circumstances unique to the property and not due to the actions of the applicant who purchased the property in 1999. The placement of the house and the applicable setbacks that apply to the subject property affects where additions can take place. The applicants have proposed the additions in the area of the property that can accommodate the addition and that is practical based on the current layout of their home. 6. Including the proposed new additions, the house will be located approximately 40 feet from the curb line abutting the south side of Jones Lane. 7. Improvements to update a single - family home, constructed in 1975, is reasonable and will not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, possible meeting date is Tuesday, July 22, 2014. Alternate date is Tuesday, August 12, 2014. -1479- 1,� 0 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX 952472 -0620 RECT JUL 01 2614 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required It time of application. r Planning Commission Date I- Case No. City Council Date -4' P655'I 1 (� -22 c>' b'I Z Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address 1784 Jones Lane Mound MN 55364 PROPERTY LEGAL Lot 004 DESI Block 002 Replat Harrison Shores PID # 13- 117 -24 -22 -0036 2onin : Rt to R2 R3 B1 62 83 (Circle one) Name Jason & Christine Baker 1784 Jones Lane Mound MN 55364 Email jbaker @jbaker.org Phone Home 952- 472 -2621 Work 612- 605 -8825 APPLICANT I Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedu for this property? Yes ( ) No (X), if yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Proposed 13'x23' addition to existing home and 6'x24' addition to existing garage. Additions match existing elevations of the home and garage. Interior remodeling of the existing master bedroom, closet and bath are all conforming. (See Attached narrative). Variance Information (1012112013) Page 4 of 6 -1480- Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (X) No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: Front Yard: SEW) Side Yard: (N ) Side Yard: ( N S Rear Yard: ( N& W ) Lakeside: ( N@E W ) :(NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover. REQUIRED 30 ft 10 ft 6 ft. 50 ft 50 ft ft. ft. 12750 sq ft 3825 sq ft REQUESTED VARIANCE (or e)dsting) 27.54 fL 11 ft 6 ft. 47.5 ft. 47.5 ft, ft. ft. sq ft 3345 sq ft 2.46 ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (X), No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation (X) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: Irregular shaped lot Variance Information (10/21/2013) Page 5 of 6 -1481- Case No. /� -15 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No N. If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (X). If yes, explain: Prope! configuration of the lot was effected by the vacated cul de sac. 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (X), No ( }. If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: See Attached Narrative I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by___,�P� Owner's Date Applicant's Signature Date Variance Inforrnation (1 012 112 0 1 3) Page 6 of 6 -1482- Owner: Owner Narrative for Variance Application Jason & Christine Baker Property Address: 1784 Jones Lane Mound, MN 55364 RECD J U L 0 1 20' 4. The proposed variance is for an addition to an existing split entry home built in 1974. We are looking to add a 2 story 13'x23' addition to the street side of the home as well as a 6' addition to the front of the garage. Both would match the elevations of the existing home and enhance the curb appeal of the home. The Variance is being requested due the irregular property line not following the street (Jones Lane). Jones Lane used to be a cul -de -sac and was converted to a through street joining with Lafayette Lane in 1975. The property marker on the North West corner (adjacent to 1776 Jones Lane) is set 12' back from the street while the property marker on the NE corner (adjacent to 1794 Jones lane) is set back 10' from the street. If both property markers were 10' from the street, no variance would be needed. Regardless of the markers, no portions of the house or garage will be less than 40' from the street. The master bedroom, closet and bathroom will also be remodeled at the same time as the addition, but all interior remodeling with conform to all building codes. Thank you. Jason Baker -1483- Supplemental Information from Applicant -- Sec. 124 -34 (a) Regarding Variance Criteria and practical Difficulty City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance maybe granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. The request for the variance is due to the unusual lot shape due to the shape of the original vacated road and the curvature of the land and granting the variance will not alter the character of the locality. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. The layout of this house on the lot is unique due to the fact that the house was built on the cul-de -sac Jones Lane, but now is a transition lot between Jones Lane and Lafayette Lane. The cul -de -sac circle was vacated when Lafayette Lane was installed and now this House has a 60 foot front yard set -back on the west side. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. The proposed variance is the minimum needed to create a usable space that is esthetically pleasing to surrounding properties. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed addition will make the house a better transition between the homes on Jones Cane and Lafayette Lane. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, 'Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character o the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. MM Hello Sarah, We have reviewed the blueprints for the planned construction at 1784 Jones Lane, and are in favor of proceeding. /Mark Carlson & Dorenda Carlson 1776 Jones Lane Mound, MN 55364 -1485- Ms. Smith -- I understand that our next door neighbors, Jason and Christine Baker, are seeking a variance for an addition and remodeling to their home. We have seen their proposed plans and have no objection to the variance. Mike and Kay Riley 1794 Jones Lane Mound, MN 55364 -1486- 1 LAFAYETTE LADE Nor lheost of Lo+ o 1 \ corner 2 6� J®NE5 L ZZ s O. I- ��lE. Norll�eesf eor. of Loo 4 0 Cox o: Description of Jones Lane to be vacated. That part of Jones Lane as platted in REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at the angle point in the northerly line of Lot 4, Block 2 in said addition, said point being 23.18 feet westerly.of the northeast corner of said Lot 4; thence westerly to the northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 3, DRIFTWOOD SHORES, according to the recorded plat thereof, and there terminating. September 10, 1975 1"-30' 6 WCOfNBS- KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, IN14 7- CONSULTING (WhIIFS C IANO SURV['D l C SITE FlAANIRS ntE NO. - _•�+,; ,, Mi NNEAPOLIS. HUI CHINSON end MARSHALL, MINN(SOTA 2672 Prepared for: CHARLES Fe OLSON 7. I q I_ v EXISTING CONDITION SURVEY / s W/ PROPOSED ADDITION FOR. J'ASON BAKER 932.3 932.5 SAN M H. 0 Legend TOP-932 27--,,,,v..o RE JUN -30 2014 C SS3 9 -CT 0 Sanitary Manhole A 0 Power Pole 0 Deciduous Tree 933.3, 10, !133. Concrete Curb 933.4. A .1 91 Timber Border /Retaining Well Retaining 9� a.\/ -9J4 34.0 #1776 FIRST FLOOR=935.3 FLOOR=933.9 Keystone Wall IZ GARAGE X900.0 Existing Elevation x900.OTC Top of Curb Elevation 934 34.4 ✓ X9 'N A <\ x x900.OTW Top of Wall Elevation A-34. 6X 934.5 935 + 3..4.6 .82— is --900— Existing Contour '--OHW 929.4-- Ordinary High Water Contour 934.6, 934.3, 0" MAPL x934: OF Sb'10 FVtO141 50BACK 35. 33.8 * Denotes Iron Monument Found * Denotes Set, 1/2" x 14" Iron Pipe w/ Plastic Cap Inscribed R.L.S. 15230. x . 936 01" 3— 28• 4 L 10i * &VIP *11, 111. L 935 9352__-- _`-3%7 — -r_ 36.2 — -- — X Ck C?) C5 Cb . 34.1 934.0 9337 Ck .932.6 93r.7 934.6, 934- #1794 FIRST FLOOR=936.8 = �, // f / //� p s\ \ GARAGE FLOOR=935.6 0 00 0 Z Iq FIRE PIT 00. 61, 931 933.8x g ax 932.4, T 9 931,1 Si;!i _,934.2 25 24- ASH -031.8 .8X /, / / 952 L CS 48* OAK dl\ 931. V) 931.8 '8X < 931.4 9317, 931 �2 C;' ri IS" 2 p Ar H b, EDGE OF WATE C7 SIP. 104-14 133/68 SCALE: 1 INCH = 10 FEET LOT AREA ABOVE ORDINARY HIGH WATER (OHW 929.4) = 12,402± SF PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block 2, REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES, Hennepin County, Minnesota. BENCHMARK: T N.H. at 1797 Loyfayette Ln Elevation = 936.92. NOTE: No Search Was Mode For Any Easements NOTE: The location of all utilities shown ore from observed evidence in the field and from plans furnished by the utility companies and ore approximate. Utility companies should be notified for exact location before doing any excavation. I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. Woodrow A. Brown, R.L.S. MN REG 15230 Datec: 06-27-2014 V. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC_ 8030 Cedar Avenue So., Suite 228. Bloomington, MN -55425 Bus- (952) 854-4055 Fox: (952) 854-4268 34'± • w La x 5.7 7 M EAS. -4 • • • IQ no A C) 1 La 'tp lro W 1 fo L04 ca 0 40A. 'oe LA .......... Ar% cx jr La 'tp lro CA 40A. 'oe 0 C.7 AL 00;v > SA M -4 > rn 0 0 M C) 7- off If (A (0 0 C004 L4 m -1489-1- 1 EXISTING BATH V-6 x 13'- ( EXISTING BEDROOM 02 x (0 CEXISTING FAMILY ROOM Pa, x 0 Lr_ EXISTING r GARAGE EXISTING 2X-0 x 215'-4 HALL 11' x 3' UP EXISTING 0 r— 7 BEDROOM 03 liv,4 x EXISTING L ENTRY/MECH. EXIST$OG OYE)R =T ---------- JL� g L I LINE OF LINE OF r-ANTLEYEE A1_5_0Y!9_ IJ . . . . . . . . . . . Tq�io_� DASHED) – — — — — — i_f_;I;0_UK C)ASWEV) WALL LEGEND — — — — — - L J EXISTING WALLS EXISTIW_% WALLS, CADINETS, EM TO SE REMOVED 1_. OW LEVEL FLAN EX16TING/lDF-10LITI ON Al 1/,4- = 1�_Cii RECT% J U L 0 1 - 2011 LOWEfR LEVEL FL 4N - FFROF05ED 1/4 R = 1' -0a LINE qF CANTILEVER 4_P!aYL — — — LUALL LEGEND EXISTING WALLS NEW 2xA ux,)00 FRAMED WALLS ig M 0 Jill 111 HCH DESIGN COMPANY P: 952.250,4215 5421 EASTVIEWAVENUE MINNETRISTA, IVIN 55364 IMPORTANT NOTE FOR CONTRACTORS & SUB-CONTRACTORS 1. These, drawings are Design Drawings. The General Contractor has the right and responsibility to revise configurations and details depicted in the Designer's Design Drawings, as required, to properly construct a technically sound project. 2. The General Contractor to notify the Designer when deviating from the Design Intent. 3, The General Contractor Is responsible for verifying all covenants, zoning, building fire, heating, plumbing and electrical code requirements. db • LOWEfR LEVEL FL 4N - FFROF05ED 1/4 R = 1' -0a LINE qF CANTILEVER 4_P!aYL — — — LUALL LEGEND EXISTING WALLS NEW 2xA ux,)00 FRAMED WALLS ig M 0 Jill 111 HCH DESIGN COMPANY P: 952.250,4215 5421 EASTVIEWAVENUE MINNETRISTA, IVIN 55364 IMPORTANT NOTE FOR CONTRACTORS & SUB-CONTRACTORS 1. These, drawings are Design Drawings. The General Contractor has the right and responsibility to revise configurations and details depicted in the Designer's Design Drawings, as required, to properly construct a technically sound project. 2. The General Contractor to notify the Designer when deviating from the Design Intent. 3, The General Contractor Is responsible for verifying all covenants, zoning, building fire, heating, plumbing and electrical code requirements. db • E =_ - -E EkiSTING i1 G ExI5TIW BATH 11 r L IVING ROOM vAULTED x 22, x ll*-S i1 1 EXISTING C� t MASTER BEDROOM _1 01 --n - DENOTES EXISTING DOORS ----------- TO BE RE- LOCATED TO REMODELED AREAS - — J 011 n (MATCH NUMBERS FROM DEMO I EXISTING PLAN TO PROPOSED PLAN GARAGE FOR NEW LOCATIONS) EXISTIWs 23'-0 x 2g' -4 HALL I' x 3' 6 CD> 0 UL, IN EXISTING 110/ 1 DINING ROOM LL f I x 14,-1, EXISTING EXISTING EXISTIW_2 CLOSET STUD" 00 <ITCHEN r_-- _..__— ..-- ___...— .— _._ --- — I' x V 01.3 xv EXIST14G &.5 x W, C4 'Ir-OYE)R 0 01__ 11 V-4 x 4. \ J 101. 11 1 Er:---j x S, WALL LEGEND ILL EXISTIN63 WALLS EXISTING WALLS, CABINETS, ETC. LEVEL FLAN EX16TING/DEr-IOLITION TO BE REMOVED A2 1/4' 1i_®" LEQ- L EO IAUN4%231 V_ EXPANDED GARAGE 23'-8 x 35'-4 F---------- 160. 10OVERHEAD DOOR - - - - - - - - - - REMODELED MASTER BEDROOM 12' x 13,-6 (D V-0" CLEAR W d) NEW o HALL"-, ° W4 3' x 5,-fp _j EXPANDED CLOSET x 121-rp x W REMODELE 54TH W V-6 x V-8 H at WALK- < LLI LIJ _j U REMODELED WALK - 4 mu'li HALL 12' x .3' W F,O E R (2) S 1/2' LVL FLUSH LEDGE AL INE OF EXISTING, HOUSE WALLS CASHED) EWS, ROOF TRUSSES 24' aC_ NEW STUDY 15'-a x 8, EXISTING L IVING ROOM VAULTED 22' x II' -s ----------- 11 II II 11 >OQUIN EXISTING I DINING ROOM cr-6 x O EXISTING II 0 KITCHEN v-S x W, 001 .................... ......... . rTFI) (2) 9 1 L FLUSH 9 EXPANDED FO`rER 6' -4 x 12'-6 DOUN 01 (2) 2.10A-S TRANSOM WOW_ 1 ,x NEW 1- PORTICO ic) 9 V-9 x 1, 2x 10's ENG. OOF TR, ITOR42.60 2W �02-4* O.G. x 8'-3" N v. WALL) (CENTER ON tl&'-&* WALL) 35,-10, --- WALL LEGEND EXISTING WALLS 6*-8" NEW 2x4 u)OOD FRAMED WALLS t 2,T-2" '0 (VERIFY uil ExI5,*4) LEVEL FL 4N FfROF=05ED 2 A2 111/ 114" = 1,-0- M P: 952,250.4215 5421 EASTVIEW AVENUE MINNETRISTA, MN 55364 IMPORTANT NOTE FOR CONTRACTORS & SUB-CONTRACTORS Drawings. The General Contractor has the right and responsibility to revise configurations and details depicted in the Designer's Design Drawings, as required. to properly construct a technically sound project. General Contractor 'd e era' Co responsibility to respons' ii' configurations and details D' ", -'gne Drawings, "' required. . technically 2, The General Contractor to notify the Designer when deviating from the Design Intent a . 3. The General Contractor is responsible for verifying all covenants, zoning, building fire, heating, plumbing and r electrical code requirements. • 40 Z • • 000 10, S=AIQE COLUMNS wl W OVER Ix8 HEAD TRIM 4 lx2 OVER Ix I0 BASE TRIM NO H ELEVATION - FFROF06ED I/A' -- I' -O" Lu _j I WEST ELEVATION - FFROFOSED SHED DORMER 4 EXISTING GARAGE OVER FRAMING: 2x6 RAFTERS 0 24* O.C. (INSTALL 2x4 VERTICAL MEMBERS TO DISTRIBUTE ROOF LOAD TO EXISTING ROOF TRU55E5 SECTION A A3 1/4' = 1i —O" ASPHALT SWINGI TYPICAL GABLE IxA FRIEZE SOAP IX(p,g VERTICAL, PANEL, (1 1/2' SF ON 2x- TAPIEREI lx(p APRON ix4 FRIEZE WAP MATCH EXISTING SOFFIT 4 FASCIA lx& CORNER 50 WINDOW TRIM HORIZONTAL LAI w/ &* EXPOSURE EAST ELEVATION 1/4' = I' —O" MATCH 12 EXIST- LINE OF PORTICO ROOF BEYOND W :x W t Y-a' O.N. O.N. (MATCH (MATCH EXIST-) EXIST.) STUDY co NEW PORTICO ALI— D :I w x cis fe z,. W Wx rn >W se X9 t Out I— MUNEW P/1-AUNDFRY Z r --� SECTION 4 A3 1/4' = P—O" TYPICAL ROOF CONSTRUCTION ROOFING (SEE EXTERIORS) 15• FELT 1/2- 0513- --SHEATHING ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES 0 24' OC. R-44 BAD. INSULATION 6 MIL poLy VAPOR BARRIER 5/8* GYP. BD_ TYPICAL 5OFFIT CONSTRUCTION. MATCH EXISTING SOFFIT ® FASCIA T'l-FICAL E XT ERIOR_ WALL CONSTRUCTION SIDING (SEE EXTERIORS) BUILDING WRAP 1/2' ObjB, SHEATHING 2*4 STUDS 9 16' OjC- Rlcj INSULATION A MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER 112* GYP. 50. TYPICAL FLOOR CONSTRUCTION 314* T4G PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR (GLUED 4 NAILED) s 112- I-JOISTS ® Wp* Or- fALIGN ALL NEW FLOORS W/ EXISTING) TYPICAL FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION 12- CONC. BLOCK ON 2®' x a* CONC. FOOTING 31/2- CONC. FLOOR SLAB ON 6- GRANULAR FILL HCH DESIGN COMPANY P: 952.250.4215 5421 EASTVIEW AVENUE MINNETRISTA, MN 55364 IMPORTANT NOTE FOR CONTRACTORS & SUB-CONTRACTORS 1. These drawings are Design Drawings, The General Contractor has the right and responsibility to revise configurations and details depicted in the Designer's Design Drawings, as required, to properly construct a technically sound project. 2. The General Contractor to notify the Designer when deviating from the Design intent, I 3. The General Contractor is responsible for verifying all covenants, zoning, building fire, heating, plumbing and electrical code requirement 31 • • it NORTH ELEVATION - EX15TING 1/4" = 1' -®" UJEST ELEV4TION EX16TING F=A,5T F:LFEVAT ION F=XI&TING A' C�' -VA--4,) 1/4" = 1'-@. (VERIFY w/ EXISTfWj� FiCH DESGN COMPANY P: 952.250.4215 5421 EASTVIEW AVENUE MINNETRISTA, MN 55364 IMPORTANT NOTE FOR CONTRACTORS & SUB-CONTRACTORS 1, These drawings are Design Drawings. The General Contractor has the right and responsibility to revise configurations and details depicted in the Designer's Design Drawings, as required, to properly construct a technically sound project. drawings n y right the h The nDrawings, n construct d D General 0 r r n a u e Designer's n 0 D e q responsibility r required, e project. a gs 0 s' es configurations `sea a r 0 details c i b Contractor technically Design d n 1 The General Contractor to notify Contractor actor y "' ai's Ically notify the Designer when deviating from the Design intent. er 3, The General Contractor is responsible for verifying all covenants, zoning, building fire, heating, plumbing and .1 . r q.1rem ts. electrical code requirements. code • • • • EXISTING UNEXCAVATED M EXISTING ca4c. BLOCK WALL TO 13E REMOVED FOR CRAWLSP ACE ACCESS EXISVwx roNr-- MOCK WALL TO BE REMOVED ALTERNATE 510 TO LEAVE EXISTiwa GONG. MOCK WALL * REMODELED MECH. ROOM (VERIFY w/ 004ER) - - - - - - - r------- - - - - -- (2) 2X IV4 2x'o - - - - - - - - - - - -7 1 f1:x 3-1-0 d) 3'-0"- IL 2x4 BEARING WALL ON IX WI � BLOCK CH 7 10 777 1 A' CURB )-I _j 20' X a' CONC, FOOTiW-2 0 . Q 6 NEW LOWER LEVEL Z11" NEW CRNEW Ji UJL5f= A 9 UNEXCAVATED 1 f2- CONC. 15LOCK FOUND- N_ iV CONC- WALL 0N 20' o (TYPICAL) FOOTIWQ (TYPIcAL) FOOTING L- — i I CoNr- IBLOCK FOUND. WALL NEW 9 g, r-URe. (OMIT a DOORS) ON 20' x 0' CONC. FOOTING L F, L UNEX• L (VERIFY w/ EXISTfWj� FiCH DESGN COMPANY P: 952.250.4215 5421 EASTVIEW AVENUE MINNETRISTA, MN 55364 IMPORTANT NOTE FOR CONTRACTORS & SUB-CONTRACTORS 1, These drawings are Design Drawings. The General Contractor has the right and responsibility to revise configurations and details depicted in the Designer's Design Drawings, as required, to properly construct a technically sound project. drawings n y right the h The nDrawings, n construct d D General 0 r r n a u e Designer's n 0 D e q responsibility r required, e project. a gs 0 s' es configurations `sea a r 0 details c i b Contractor technically Design d n 1 The General Contractor to notify Contractor actor y "' ai's Ically notify the Designer when deviating from the Design intent. er 3, The General Contractor is responsible for verifying all covenants, zoning, building fire, heating, plumbing and .1 . r q.1rem ts. electrical code requirements. code • • • • ru t-�j Consulting Engineers & Surveyors (U"J 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 www,bolton- menk.com July 17, 2014 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project City Project Nos. PW- 13 -01, PW- 13 -02, PW -13 -05 Pay Request No. 9 Dear Ms. Hanson: f r,-.1 Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 9 from GMH Asphalt Corporation for work completed on the 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project from January 6, 2014 through July 14, 2014. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $160,661.60 to GMH Asphalt Corporation. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance 1494- DATE: 7/14/2014 CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 9 CONTRACTOR GMH Asphalt Corp. 2013 STREET IMPROVEMENTS OWNER City of Mound City Project Nos. PW- 13 -01, PW- 13 -02, PW -13 -05 ENGINEER Bolton & Menk BMI PROJECT NO. 012.105545 FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 1/6/2014 THROUGH 7/14/2014 TOTALAMOUNT BID ... ---- ............................................................._._............._ ...........................__.. _........._.. $ 4174,544.41 APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS + EXTRA WORK ...................................................... ............................... $ 290,898,41 CURRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT .......... ..........................._.................................... ............................... $ 4,565,442.82 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE ..... ....... ... .............. ............................. .......... ............... _ ........ .............. ........ $ 4,687,288.52 TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE. .............................. ..................... ........... ......... .......... — ........ - - - $ - DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED.......................... ........... .................... . -- $ TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK It STORED MATERIALS..._ ............... ................................... ................. ................... $ 4,687,288.52 RETAINED PERCENTAGE ( 2.5% ) . .................................... .................................. ............................... $ 117,182.21 TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS ......... .............. ............................. ............ -...... ......... ... ,........ .......... $ - NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE ........ ....... - ................... .......................... --- ... - ........................ $ 4,570,106.31 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES ................................................................ ............................... $ 4,409,444.71 PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO. 9 .............. ............ .............. ........,..........,_....._....... .............. .................. $ 160,661.60 Certificate for Payment I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been complied with and that all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured. Contractor: GMH Asphalt Corporation 9180 Lake Town Road Chaska, MN 55318 By Name Title Date CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: BOLTON & MENK, INC., ENGINEERS, 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318 By rC"i'ta- ..€^�, '�ci ", it- yf*- �"Y'L'�-� , PROJECT ENGINEER Daniel L. Faulkner Date APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: Owner: CITY OF MOUND By Name Title Date -1495- / /f -.'_ Consulting Engineers & Surveyors " l 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 _' Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bolton- menk.com July 17, 2014 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2014 Seal Coat Project City Project No. PW -14 -07 Award of Contract Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: The areas to be seal coated include all of the 2009 Street Reconstruction Project area streets as well as the Sugar Mill area streets and Bellaire Lane from Grandview Boulevard to Alder Road (attached Figures 1 -4). The contractor is required to complete this work by August 26, 2014. This will be followed by the second sweeping which is required to be completed by September 5, 2014. Quotes were received for the 2014 Seal Coat Project on July 15, 2014. There are basically three qualified contractors that do nearly all of the seal coating work in the metro area and they were all contacted to see if they would submit a quote for the Mound project. Two of them responded that the August completion schedule would work for them but only one of these two submitted a quote as follows: 1. Allied Blacktop Company $84,320.00 The low quote is less than the engineer's estimate of $95,800.00. Allied Blacktop Company, out of Maple Grove, MN has successfully completed several seal coat projects throughout Minnesota including the City of Mound's 2010, 2011 and 2013 Seal Coat projects. It is our recommendation to award the 2014 Seal Coat Project to Allied Blacktop Company in the amount of $84,320.00. A resolution is included recommending award of contract in this amount to Allied Blacktop Company. Sincerely, Bolton & Monk, Inc. Daniel L. Faulkner, P. E. City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is — en-A opportunity employer -1496- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 2014 BITUMINOUS SEAL COAT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the City has an annual road maintenance program consisting of crack repair and seal coating that is contracted work both of which are included in the City's Capital Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, this type of road maintenance is typically completed initially on streets that are five to six years old; and WHEREAS, the 2014 Seal Coat project area includes all of the bituminous streets reconstructed with the 2009 Street Reconstruction Project as well as the Sugar Mill area streets and Bellaire Lane from Grandview Boulevard to Alder Road, and WHEREAS, the Seal Coat Project was estimated to cost less than $100,000, the statutory limit requiring public advertisement for bids; and WHEREAS, quotes were solicited and received on July 15, 2014 at the office of Bolton & Menk, Inc. and tabulated as follows: Allied Blacktop Company $84,320.00 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to award the contract for the 2014 Bituminous Seal Coat Improvement Project to Allied Blacktop Company, out of Maple Grove, MN in the amount of $84,320.00. Adopted by the City Council this 22`d day of July, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mayor, Mark Hanus -1497- o z 0 � o a w Q L� U O F- U o ` O O z Q W s D W 0 LLJ -J � �f�� � Q Li iiL4 Q z 1 , i I DO v Q wy� omS w �7 T 4... J i 'l o �n 8 6 j mi vi mia C 3 M yJ0 c , W N N ITT nF Z o N 0 LL j o UWW1iii%" L� E j C � w0 � U o mD- _j �z 00 m= O' 19.70 V) Z O Q U O J Q U J W O � Z W� CD 0 W N J ante 3003153M -1499- x \ L �� O O N Lai W coO O W J Q U Q � N O Z U W Ir W --D u z ° E �n 0 o LLUw OJT Q W U � � O o N N J 7 U = Z �N � - W e W; w�N O c C a rc i z t m z � a U L o d' � Zw E a�ov. O O N a c w a N n L O Z U Ju ym�< O Z vo a m � o C U O Z 7 00 m 0 z mm z z 0 pd x N z O a U O a U Q Li 0 � z Wo WN J O O N W W L� O O CD W J Q U O N 401.11 OF nniB �.aUawaap 1 � i 1500- n 0 z 0 1� U L z0 D CO G Q < 0 U W Q �w cn O � 0 N 0 O Z W Of D U E 0 N J Z Z¢ a Jw J < Y 3< n =z� >U � uj a ¢ 3f w m s rn m zd� rn z x ZW 0- Z -� U N VI Z O z a � O' O 0] 0 0 v w w 0 z 0 - w 0 U [if W ::D zo W o << 0 OLL- U Li J F- i Q LJ f.� > V) z� X711 Oe rill o......... _ r n 71 r ON x3553 r I i� �� Z ..._ l51 d �, o > i Y I ,_- _ m O 1 n &7N/ � �c E 0a �'— , --+:•� a (I.'l'„N,{ �� / /JI I _ °i a3ix�.�'o�.- .. --!i C of arn� IJV 1 �`\ a+ '� j: � � Consulting Engineers &t Surveyors " � 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 •Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 `- _ Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bolton- menk.com July 17, 2014 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 3025 Island View Drive Retaining Wall Replacement Award of Contract Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: E. Following the heavy rain events in early June, staff noticed the timber retaining, extending across three properties centered at 3025 Island View Drive, had begun to bulge out and appeared to be in an imminent state of failure. Staff took immediate precautions and closed approximately one- half of the roadway and continued to monitor the status of the wall while we developed a replacement wall plan and contacted retaining wall contractors. It was determined that the best solution would be to use a large concrete block (approximately 1,700 pounds per block) system due to the height of the existing wall and the limited space available. We worked with the local supplier and their engineer to develop the plans and specifications for the replacement wall. Quotes were solicited from three contractors and two responded as follows: 1. Advanced Wall Structures, Inc. 2. Rosti Construction Company $123,760.00 $222,200.00 Due to the unique nature of this project and the fact that it is an "emergency" replacement project we felt an acceptable range would be anywhere from $100,000 to $140,000 although there are not any other feasible options. It is our recommendation to award the 3025 Island View Drive Retaining Wall Replacement project be awarded to Advanced Wall Structures, Inc. out of Prior Lake, in the amount of $123,760.00. This is the same contractor that successfully completed the emergency wall replacement on Three Points Boulevard earlier this year. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Daniel L. Faulkner, P. E. City Engineer DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is — — I opportunity employer -1502- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR 3025 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT WHEREAS, following the large rain events in early June, City staff noticed the existing timber retaining wall located at 3025 Island View Drive and extending across both adjacent properties was bulging out and appeared to be in imminent failure status; and WHEREAS, City staff took immediate precautionary safety measures to limit any potential for personal injury or property damage; and WHEREAS, the City's engineer, Bolton & Menk, Inc., was requested to assess the condition and develop a wall replacement plan and solicit quotes as soon as possible; and WHEREAS, contact was made with a professional engineer with expertise in evaluating "failing" retaining walls; and WHEREAS, the professional engineer recommended immediate replacement of the existing timber wall and suggested using a "large block" concrete wall system; and WHEREAS, three retaining wall contractors were contacted to see if they would be interested in submitting a quote to complete this project as soon as possible; and WHEREAS, quotes were solicited and received on July 16, 2014 at the office of Bolton & Menk, Inc. and tabulated as follows: Advanced Wall Structures, Inc. $123,760.00 Rosti Construction Company $222,200.00 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to award the contract for the 3025 Island View Drive Retaining Wail Replacement Project to Advanced Wall Structures, Inc., out of Prior Lake, MN in the amount of $123,760.00. Adopted by the City Council this 22r1 day of July, 2014 Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mayor, Mark Hanus -1503- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 Executive Summary To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director Date: July 17, 2014 Re: Public Hearing- Ordinance Amending Chapter 129 Related to Zoning — Swimming Pool Cover Regulations Summary. The City Council will hold a public hearing as part of its Tuesday, July 22, 2014 meeting to review a proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance. The proposed amendment would allow for the use of a swimming pool cover as an alternative to installation of a fence enclosure. Procedure. Minnesota State Statutes 462.357 Subd.3 states that no zoning ordinance or amendment can be adopted until a public hearing is held by the planning agency or by the governing body. Additionally, the notice of the public hearing must also be published at least (10) days prior to the hearing date. Mound City Code Section 129 -34 (a) (1) requires that any proposed text amendment which is not initiated by the Planning Commission must be referred to the Planning Commission for review. Staff has noticed the public hearing for the proposed zoning amendment in accordance to Minnesota State Statute and City Code. Background and Discussion. The Planning Commission, at its June 3rd meeting, reviewed a variance application requesting waiver of the swimming pool fence enclosure requirements s contained in the City Code as an automated pool cover was proposed to be installed. Based on its review, the Planning Commission voted to recommend Council approval, as recommended by Staff, subject to conditions. Following the Planning Commission meeting, additional review and discussion took place with the City Attorney about the use of a variance. It was determined that a better tool with regard to allowing the use of an automated pool cover is through an amendment to the zoning ordinance. To be eligible as an fence alternative, the swimming pool cover must meet the American Standard Testing Materials (ASTM) specification F1346 -91 standard which includes the following requirements: The static load test for weight support. The cover should be able to hold a weight of at least 485 lbs (2 adults and 1 child) to permit rescue operation. -1504- Perimeter Deflection Tests far entry or entrapment between the cover and the side of the pool. The cover must demonstrate that any opening is sufficiently small and strong enough to prevent the test object being passed through. The Surface Drainage Test which safeguards against a dangerous amount of water collecting on the cove ✓s surface. - Labeling requirements must include basic consumer information such as the warranty information, the appropriate warnings as described in the standard, and acknowledge the product as a safety cover. 2. The Planning Report for the aforementioned variance, included a listing of cities and townships that currently allow use of a pool cover in lieu of a fence. The list was provided by the applicant and property owner. Some of the communities listed were Buffalo, Independence, Deephaven, New Market, Greenfield, Inver Grove Heights, Rogers, Northfield, Rochester, Scandia and Minnetrista. A copy of an informational handout from the City of Inver Grove Heights has been included which contains provisions that allow the use of pool covers. 3. The proposed amendment was reviewed by the Consultant Planner and City Attorney and includes their suggestions. It was also forwarded to the Police Chief, the Building Official, the Fire Chief, the City Manager and the Finance Director /City Clerk. The Building Official and Finance Director /City Clerk responded that the draft was acceptable. The Fire Chief commented that he had no issues. 4. Council members are advised that the Planning Report for the pool cover variance mentioned that the Planning Commission may wish to discuss possible amendments to the City Code to allow the use of a pool cover system. Also, as part of the Planning Commission's review and discussion of the variance application, Commissioner Retterath commented that he was supportive of changing the code to allow for the pool cover alternative. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance amendment at its July in meeting. The majority of the Planning Commission's discussion focused on the ASTM standards that must be met for the pool enclosure. The Planning Commission was favorable to the proposed amendment and unanimously voted to recommend Council approval, as recommended by Staff. A copy of the July 1" Planning Commission meeting minute excerpts have been included as an attachment. Requested Action. Approval. ® Page 2 -1505- MINUTE EXCERPTS i1AWxVAjXwHTTk' •, • •, JULY 1, •, Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. 6 ..fit Discussion /action — Review of amendment to zoning ordinance related to swimming pool covers Smith reviewed the history of the pool cover issue. A proposed ordinance has been drafted for review. The ASTM minimum standard will be required. Retterath commented t t the ht b as Ar'a lause requ "no regular maintenance. Smieja stated that he fel ` red at th µ'n correctly plat d the responsibility on the property owner. Retterath said that, if it passed the City Attorney's review it is good enough for him. MOTION by Wegscheid, second by Gawtry, to recommend approving the changes. MOTION carried unanimously. -1506- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE -2014 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 129 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO ZONING The City of Mound does ordain: Section 1. Subsection 129- 196(b)(1) of the Mound City Code is hereby amended to add the following new language: Sec. 129 -196. (b) Swimming pools and hot tubs. Within any residential district, swimming pools and hot tubs shall be permitted subject to the following restrictions: (1) Swimming pools. Swimming pools having a water depth of two feet or more which are operated for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents of the principal use and their guests are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: a. Swimming pools shall be subject to the following setbacks: 1. The side yard setback is ten feet. 2. The corner lots, from the side street setback is 15 feet. 3. The rear yard setback is 15 feet. 4. Lakeshore, from the ordinary high -water line setback is 50 feet. 5. From any structure on same lot the setback is ten feet. 6. From principal building on an adjoining lot the setback is 20 feet. b. Private swimming pools are prohibited in the front portion of residential parcels. The front portion includes the area extending across the entire width of the lot and situated between the front line of the principal building and the front lot line. c. The swimming pool shall be entirely enclosed by a protective fence or other permanent structure not less than five feet nor more than six feet in height. Such protective enclosures shall be maintained by locked gates or entrances when tended by qualified and re6pansible person a responsible person is not present outdoors and within 25 feet of the pool. d. As an alternative to a protective fence or other permanent structure as required by subsection (b)(1)c of this section an automatic pool cover may be utilized if it meets the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) F1346 -91 Standard -1507- (2010) as such standards may be modified superseded or replaced by ASTM Such pool cover shall be closed when a responsible person is not present outdoors and within 25 feet of the pool. Passed by the City Council this _ day of Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk 2014 Mayor Mark Hanus Published in the Laker the of , 2014. Effective the day of 2014. 13 LExcerpts from Mound City Codo, Section 129-196 Requirements applicable to all residential districts. (b) Swimming pools and hot tubs. Within any residential district, swimming pools and hot tubs shall be permitted subject to the following restrictions: 2010 (1) Swimming pools. Swimming pools having a water depth of two feet or more which are operated for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents of the principal use and their guests are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: a. Swimming pools shall be subject to the following setbacks: 1. The side yard setback is ten feet. 2. The corner lots, from the side street setback is 15 feet. 3. The rear yard setback is 15 feet. 4. Lakeshore, from the ordinary high -water line setback is 50 feet. 5. From any structure on same lot the setback is ten feet. 6. From principal building on an adjoining lot the setback is 20 feet. b. Private swimming pools are prohibited in the front portion of residential parcels. The front portion includes the area extending across the entire width of the lot and situated between the front line of the principal building and the front lot line. C. The swimming pool shall be entirely enclosed by a protective fence or other permanent structure not less than five feet nor more than six feet in height. Such protective enclosures shall be maintained by locked gates or entrances when the pool is not tended by a qualified and responsible person. (2) Hot tubs. Outdoor hot tubs shall comply with subsections (b)(1)a and b of this section with the exception that the setback from any structure on the same lot shall not apply. Furthermore, all outdoor hot tubs shall be required to either contain surrounding decking with appropriate guardrails or shall be secured by a locked cover when not in use. -1509- City of Inver Grove Heights 8150 Barbara Avenue 1" Inver Grove Heights MN 55077 Inspections Department Phone: 651 -450 -2550 Fax: 651 -450 -2502 w inveroroveheiohts.orc PRIOR TO APPLYING FOR A BUILDING PERMIT PLEASE CONTACT: 1) PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 651- 450.2569 FOR SETBACK AND IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE INFORMATION 2) ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT 651 -450 -2570 FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS PERMIT (Use Miscellaneous Permit Application for Above Ground Pools and a Building Permit Application for In- Ground Pools) A permit application and plot plan must be submitted to the City Inspections Division. Information provided must include: 4 size • type of construction • location of pool on property with setback distances marked • fencing type and location • pool cover information (if applicable) FEES Contact the Inspections Department at 651 - 450 -2550 for permit fee information. Payment can be made by cash, check, or major credit card. SETBACKS Swimming pools, hot tubs, spas and inflatable pools shall be set back a minimum of ten (10) feet from any side or rear lot line as measured from the nearest edge of the slope around the pool, the perimeter walk, or the edge of the pool (whichever is closer to said lot line). The setback is measured from the outside edge of the pool, or if so equipped, the edge of a perimeter walk. A minimum six (6) foot separation is required between the principal structure and any accessory structure (including pools). Swimming pools, hot tubs, spas, and inflatable pools are not allowed in the front or side yards or in the area between the street right -of way and the minimum required building setback line. DRAINAGE OF SITE Swimming pools, hot tubs, spas, and inflatable pools which raise the existing elevation more than eight (8) feet shall be reviewed by the Building Official who shall have the right to refuse the permit for -1510- construction of the same is, in his opinion, adjoining properties will be adversely affected because of the alteration of drainage patterns. DRAINAGE OF POOL The drainage of swimming pools, hot tubs, spas, and inflatable pools shall not discharge across adjoining properties. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE Please note that in the "R" residential zoning districts, there is a maximum impervious coverage standard. Please contact the Planning Office at 651 - 450 -2553 if your property is in one of these districts. FENCING A minimum four (4) foot non - climbable fence or approved barrier is required around outdoor swimming pools, hot tubs, spas, and inflatable pools or around the property. Exceptions to the above requirement are: A. Hot tubs and spas equipped with latching covers conforming to ASTM F 1346 -91, Standard Performance Specifications for Safety Covers and Labeling Requirements. Note: Label must be visible at time of inspection. B. Inflatable pools with a surface area of fourteen (14) or less feet in diameter, and less than thirty (30) inches in depth from the deepest point to the spill level, and erected between Memorial Day and Labor Day. C. Pool covers conforming to ASTM F 1346 -91, Standard Performance Specifications for Safety Covers and Labeling Requirements. Note: Label must be visible at time of inspection. D. Pools with at least 4 foot high side walls with removable ladder. In instances where the hot tub or spa contains a latching cover or the pool contains a cover or the fence has a door or gate, then the property owner must keep the cover closed and the door and gate closed unless a resident of the property is present outdoors and within 25 feet of the hot tub, spa or pool. If the fence is equipped with doors or gates, then the doors or gates shall be self - closing, latching and childproof. POOL HEATER A separate Mechanical Permit is required for the installation of pool heating equipment. OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL A minimum of ten (10) feet horizontal clearance must exist between the inside edge of swimming pools and overhead power service lines (National Electrical Code, Section 680 -8). For special situations or further information, contact Gary Pederson, State Electrical Inspector at 952 - 431 -3565. UTILITY LINES Contact Gopher State One Call at 651 - 454 -0002 n.tnr to digging to have utility lines marked. -1511- s i -a 1. BUILDING SITE ADDRESS ZIP CODE ,o to 2. OWNER NAME ADDRESS PHONE (HOME) (WORK) 3. xe CONTRACTOR ADDRESS PHONE (FAX) 4. ARCHITECT /ENGINEER ADDRESS PHONE (FAX) 5. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE (attach if long description) 6. CLASS OF WORK: NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ REMODEVALTERATION ❑ OTHER ❑ 7. DESCRIBE WORK to M M a. USE OF BUILDING 9. CONSTRUCTION DATA: p Setbacks: Front Square Feet: Basement Garage Right Side 1st Floor Porch W Left Side 2nd Floor Deck Rear Side 3rd Floor Other Structure Height: VALUATION (incl. Labor): 10. The undersigned acknowledges that he /she has read this application and that the above is correct and agrees to comply with all the ordinances and laws of the City of Inver Grove Heights regulating building construction. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE NOTICE: This is an application only. Permit will be issued after city approval and payment of fees. MWASNaam 5.: .'tom s3 s ?:a:' OFFICE USE ONLY FEE TYPE AMOUNT RECEIPT CODE Zoning Occupancy Type of Constr. # of Stories Bdrm /Dwelling Units Max. Occup. Load Sprinklered Application Accepted By License No. Building Insp. Approval Planning Approval Engineering Approval Fire Marshal Approval Approved to Issue By Date Approved SPECIAL CONDITIONS Contractors License Building Permit Plan Review Surcharge Sprinkler /Alarm Permit Misc. Permits (Sign, Fence) MCWS Sac Charge Sewer Connection Fee Water Connection Fee Water Treatment Fee Meter Sale Tax on Meter B -Line Sewer Connection Park Dedication Fees Eagan Utility Connections Other Forms & Fees TOTAL FEE Receipt # Date Issued *APPLICANT NOT TO SEPARATE SHEETS* AK AL AM BR AO AR BP BD BC CD WD BO BE 80 CA AS NOTICE: Inspections made by the City are a public service and do not constitute any representation, guarantee or warranty, either implied or expressed, to any p 'a the condition of the building Inspected. 8150 Barbara Ave. • Inver Grove -1 IA71N 55077 • Inspections 651- 450 -2550 CP 9 -6002 R nAJL crry ar- r�sourri� .. MEMORANDUM Date: July 17, 2014 To: Mayor and City Council �a From: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administrative Services t_. L;.L tx Subject: 2014 Bond Issues Stacie Kvilvang, Senior Financial Advisor for Ehlers and Associates, will be present at the meeting to discuss the 2014 bond issues. The 2014A bonds will finance the following projects: 2014 STREETS PROJECTS COST SUMMARY PORCEMAIN/ STREET TOTAL PROJECT WATERMAIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTION COSTS PROJECT: PROJECT 1: THREE POINTS BLVD - AVOCET TO END $1,165,138.17 $178,783.00 $41,574.34 $12,958.24 $525,118.98 $1,923,572.73 PROJECT 2: BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS $839487.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $839,487.35 PROJECT 3: THREE POINTS BLVD - COMMERCE TO AVOCET UTILITIES $532,214.96 $90,36181 $316,830.17 $6,516.38. $89,953.031 $1,035,878.34 TOTAL PROJECT COST (STREET): $2,536,840.48 $269,146.81 $358,464.51 $19,474.61 $615,072.01 $3,798,938.42 GRAN DVIEW LIFT STATION $367,381.30 $367,381.30 SANITARY SEWER CIPP LINING $150,000.00 $150,000.00 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS $108,060.00 $108,060.00 $50,000.00 OUTLET CLEANING AND REPAIRS $50,000.00 EMERGENCY RETAINING WALL - THREE $38,191.50 $38,197.50 POINTS EMERGENCY RETAINING WALL - $113,332.50 $113,332.50 ISLANDVIEW TOTAL PROJECT COSTS: $2,536,840.48 $427,206.81 $675,785.61 $170,996.61 $615,072.01 - $4,625,903.72 In addition, the Council approved the purchase of a sewer vac truck at the June 24, 2014 Council meeting. Staff has analyzed the Sewer Fund reserves as well as a lease purchase agreement, and has determined issuing bonds payable over 10 years to be the most advantageous option. The truck will be finance and purchased in 2014 with debt service and depreciation beginning in 2015. Lastly, interest rates continue to be favorable making refunding of prior bond issues worthwhile. Series 2014B Refunding Bonds will refund the 2005 bond issues. Please let Catherine know if you have any questions regarding this matter at (952)472 -0633. -1513- LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE July 22, 2014 City of Mound, Minnesota $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A Prepared by: Stacie Kvilvang Senior Financial Advisor And Jason Aarsvold Financial Advisor -1514- Proposed Issue: $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A ` Purposes: The proposed issue includes financing for the following purposes: 2014 road and utility reconstruction projects and the purchase of a vacuum truck • $786,071 will be used for street reconstruction projects, including Three Points Blvd, and other retaining wall projects. Debt service will be paid from special assessments and a tax levy. • Approximately $3,839,832 will be for water, storm sewer, and sanitary sewer work attributable to the respective enterprise funds. Debt service will be paid with water utility revenues, storm sewer utility revenues, and sanitary sewer utility revenues. m Approximately $340,000 of the proceeds will be used to purchase a vacuum truck. Debt service will be repaid with a-bftxfevy. -S &wc.r Lt In I i " 14 Sc-i - rr rS . The street improvement portion of the Bonds is being issued for a 16 -year term Authority: pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475. Because the City is assessing at least 20% of the project costs, the Bonds can be a general obligation without a referendum and will not count against the City's debt limit. It is the intent of the City to levy approximately $307,536 in special assessments against benefitting property owners at 2% over the True Interest Cost (TIC) of the Bonds and staff expects approximately $73,809 in prepaid special assessments (approximately 24 %). The issue size has been reduced by the prepayment amount. The assessments will be levied for a 15 -year term, commencing in 2014, for collection in the years 2015 through 2029 for payment on the Bonds. The utility portion is being issued for a 2l- year term pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 444 and 475. Because the utility portion of the bonds is paid 100% with revenues, there is no requirement for a referendum and the Bonds do not count against the City's debt limit. The equipment certificate is being issued for a 10 -year term pursuant Minnesota Statues, Chapter 412.301. For the equipment certificate portion of the Bonds, the total amount of this Certificate is under .25% of the City's estimated market value and therefore does not require a publication of a resolution of intent to issue the bonds or a public hearing. However, this portion of the Bonds does count against the City's debt limit. There is approximately $24.5 million of debt that still could be issued. By deducting the equipment certificate portion from this amount, this reduces the available debt limit to approximately $24.1 million. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith, credit and taxing powers are pledged. Presale Report — Series 2014A -1515- July 22, 2014 City of Mound, Minnesota Page 1 Term /Call Feature: The Bonds are being issued for a 21 year term. Principal on the Bonds will be 2016 through 2035. Interest is payable every due on February I in the years six months beginning August 1, 2015. The Bonds maturing on and after February 1, 2024 will be subject to prepayment at the discretion of the City on February 1, 2023 or any date thereafter. B na k Qualification: Because the City is issuing less than $10,000,000 in the calendar year, the City Bank will be able to designate the Bonds as "bank qualified" obligations. qualified status broadens the market for the Bonds, which can result in lower interest rates. The City's most recent bond issues were rated "AA" by Standard & Poor's. Rating: The City will request a new rating for the Bonds. If the winning bidder on the Bonds elects to purchase bond insurance, the rating for the issue may be higher than the City's bond rating in the event that the bond rating of the insurer is higher than that of the City. — Based on our knowledge of your situation, your objectives communicated to Basis for Recommendation: us, our advisory relationship as well as characteristics of various municipal financing options, we are recommending the issuance of General Obligation Bonds as a suitable financing option because this is the most overall cost effective option that still maintains future flexibility for the repayment of debt. — Method of Sale /Placement: the Bonds from local bane �l solicit competitive banks in your area and bids for purchase of regional underwriters. We have included an allowance for discount bidding equal to 1.100% of the principal amount of the issue. The discount is treated as an interest item and provides the underwriter with all or a portion of their compensation in the transaction. If the Bonds are purchased at a price greater than the minimum bid amount (maximum discount), the unused allowance may be used to lower your borrowing amount. Premium Bids: Under current market conditions, most investors in municipal bonds prefer "premium" pricing structures. A premium is achieved when the coupon for any maturity (the interest rate paid by the issuer) exceeds the yield to the investor, resulting in a price paid that is greater than the face value of the bonds. The sum of the amounts paid in excess of face value is considered "reoffering premium." The amount of the premium varies, but it is not uncommon to see premiums for new issues in the range of 2.00% to 10.001/6 of the face amount of the issue. This means that an issuer with a $2,000,000 offering may receive bids that result in proceeds of $2,040,000 to $2,200,000. Presale Report — Series 2014A -1516- July 22, 2014 City of Mound, Minnesota Page 2 For this issue of Bonds we have been directed to use the premium to reduce the size of the issue for the project. The adjustments may slightly change the true interest cost of the original bid, either up or down. You have the choice to limit the amount of premium in the bid specifications. This may result in fewer bids, but it may also eliminate large adjustments on the day of sale and other uncertainties. Review of Existing Debt: We have reviewed all outstanding indebtedness and determined that the 2005A and 2005B bonds present a current refunding opportunity. The City is set to consider refunding these bonds as Series 2014B (under separate presale report). We will continue to monitor the market and the call dates for the City's outstanding debt and will alert you to any future refunding opportunities. Continuing Disclosure: Because the City has more than $10,000,000 in outstanding debt (including this issue) and this issue is over $1,000,000, the City will be agreeing to provide certain updated Annual Financial Information and its Audited Financial Statement amorally as well as providing notices of the occurrence of certain "material events" to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the "MSRB "), as required by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The City is already obligated to provide such reports for its existing bonds, and has contracted with Ehlers to prepare and file the reports. Arbitrage Monitoring: Because the Bonds are tax- exempt securities /tax credit securities, the City must ensure compliance with certain Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rules throughout the life of the issue_ These rules apply to all gross proceeds of the issue, including initial bond proceeds and investment earnings in construction, escrow, debt service, and any reserve funds. How issuers spend bond proceeds and how they track interest earnings on funds (arbitrage /yield restriction compliance) are common subjects of IRS inquiries. Your specific responsibilities will be detailed in the Nonarbitrage Certificate prepared by your Bond Attorney and provided at closing. We recommend that you regularly monitor compliance with these rules and /or retain the services of a qualified firm to assist you. Risk Factors: Special Assessments: We have assumed $73,809 in pre -paid special assessments and we have assumed that assessments are levied as projected. If the City receives significantly more pre -paid assessments, it may need to increase the levy portion of the debt service to make up for lower interest earnings than the expected assessment interest rate. This presale report summarizes our understanding of the City's objectives for the structure and terms of this financing as of this date. As additional facts become known or capital markets conditions change, we may need to modify the structure and/or terms of this financing to achieve results consistent with the City's objectives. Presale Report — Series 2014A -1517- July 22, 2014 City of Mound, Minnesota Page 3 Proposed Debt Issuance Schedule Pre -Sale Review by City Council July 22, 2014 Distribute Official Statement: Week of August 11, 2014 Conference with Rating Agency: Week of August 18th �I City Council Meeting to Award Sale of the Bonds: August 26, 2014 Estimated Closing Date: September 18, 2014 Attachments Sources and Uses of Funds Proposed Debt Service Schedule Resolution Authorizing Ehlers to Proceed With Bond Sale Ehlers Contacts Financial Advisors: Stacie Kvilvang (651) 697 -8506 Jason Aarsvold (651) 697 -8512 Disclosure Coordinator: Jen Chapman (651) 697 -8566 Financial Analyst: Alicia Gage (651) 697 -8551 The Official Statement for this financing will be mailed to the City Council at their home address or e- mailed for review prior to the sale date. Presale Report — Series 2014A -1518- July 22, 2014 City of Mound, Minnesota Page 4 Council Member Resolution No. introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution Providing for the Sale of $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A (the "Bonds "), to finance road and utility reconstruction projects and the purchase of a vacuum truck in the City; and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "), as its independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization; Findines. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on August 26, 2014, for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds. 3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by City Council Member _ and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following City Council Members voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 22nd day of July, 2014. -1519- City Clerk City of found, Minnesota $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A Issue Summary Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 09/18/2014 I Delivered 09/1812014 Improvement Storm Issue Bonds Sewer Fund Water Fund Sewer Fund Equipment Summary . Sources Of Funds ... .._ ,., .,,. .... ,,,e .,nn nn e�.. non nn ci nni mr, nn 1'ur Amount oti3w ds _ 0 /JU,VUU m1 �xvv vom,.o .,•�..- - r. -: -_ -. .._ __. - 73,80100 U , (d Asscssuunis 73 5(19.00 � _ ____._._ __ __ .. ... __.___ $803.809.00 5900,000.00 $2,595,000.00 $435,000.00 $345,000,00 __$5,078,809,00 Total Sources _ __ __ . Uses Of Funds S,U30.00 9,900.fW 2S,545. o- -0,785AU 3, 795 00 55 055.0_0 - - _ _. _ I (III Iln I r IIICI F I %N:inl(1 II. (I��o1 - 30,62_7.68 _— 5,134.12 5500000 . Cost rllvsu.,ncc - - " 6.67588 10622.32 2,536,839,00 427,20200 340.000 00 4 965.9_03 00 Depo ll [o Ro_ect Constmction Fund 7A6 077.00 - -. - -- 875 786.00 2. 85100 ._ 092.72 3,69168. (2.126.121 _1;20500 _ _ - -' Round'nF Amount _._ _(L011.68) S803.809.00 $900,000.00 $2.595,000.00 $435,000.00 5345.000.00 $5.078,809.00 Total Uses genes 2014A GO UU106 1 Issue Summery I7/1512D14 1 431 PM EHLERS , t All .R_ Ip PDR( IC I NAHCI -1520- City of Mound, Minnesota $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A Issue Summary Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I 105% of Total Levylisurplus) 02/01/2015 - - - - - - - 02/01/2016 195,000.00 0.700% 184,837,34 37983734 395,82921 22,441.76 376,387.45 02/01/2017 235,00000 1000% 13360750 368,607.50 387,037,88 22.44775 364,596.13 02/01/2018 245,00000 1250% 131257.50 376,257.50 395,070.38 22,44176 372,62862 02/0112019 _ 255,00000 1.550% 2222 2172 1717 128,195.00 2217. 2222_. 383,19500 402,354.75 22,44176 2172.. _ 37991299 02/01/2020 255,00000 1850% 124,242.50 379,24250 398,204.63 22,44176 1722 375,762.87 02/01/2021 260,000,00 2150% 119,525.00 379,52500 398,50125 22,44175 376,05950 02/01/2022 260,00000 2350% 113,935.00 373,935.00 392,63175 22,44176 370,18999 0210Jr2023 270,00000 1600% 107,825.00 377,82500 396,71625 22,441,75 374,274.50 02/01/2024 270,00000 40,06_._ 2700% 1717._.._ 100.80500 1721___ _.— 370,805.00 1721_ 389,34515 .� 22,44176 366,90349 .-_.__... 02 /G 1/2025 240,00400 2.850% 93,515.00 333,515.00 35019075 22,441.75 327,749.00 02/01/2026 245,000,00 2950% 86,675,00 331,67500 348,258.75 22,44175 325,81700 02/01/2027 250,000.00 315011 79,447.50 329,447.50 345,919.88 22,44176 323,47812 02101/2028 255,000.00 3 250'. 71,572 50 326,572 50 342,901.13 22,441.75 320,459 38 022/01/2029 270,000 00 3 350". 63,285 00 1721_._ 333,285 00 2171._ 2171_.1717 349,949 25 1717__ 22,441.75 327,507 50 02/0112030 250,600.00 ._ _. 3450% 54,24000 334,24000 350,952.00 .2..__1 _ 1721. 22,441.76 - 1717__.1724 328,51024 02/01/2031 225,000,00 3.550 °.5 44,580.00 269,580.00 283,059 DO 283,059.00 02N1/2032 235,000.00 3600% 36,59250 271,592.50 255,17213 - 285,17213 02/00033 240,00000 1650:, 28,132.50 268,132.50 281,539.13 - 281,539.13 02/01/2034 255,00000 3700 °6 _19,372.50 _ _274,37250 288,091.13 _ 288,091.13 02/01/2035 -65,000 GO 3750% 9,937.50 274,937.50 288,684.38 - 288,68438 Tate] $5,005,000.00 - $1,731,579.84 56,736,579.84 $7,073,408.83 $336,626.33 $6,736,782.50 significant Dates Dated rirsl Couuo,, 1Jaic _ 1721 1722 _. Bond Year Dot tars _ Average Life A ei C'ou }-:;n Net lntcrost Cost rNIC) True LneresJ Cost ('IJC) 1717. .. 2171. _- _ 1722 1717. 1721... flood Yield for Arbitrage Auposes 1717 2217__ _ 2221.._ . 1717 AUlnclustve Cost[A1C) Se,ioe 2014A G0 UtS1ty 8 I Issue Summary 1711`1Y414:31 PM EHLERS I I'. AOrr RS IN Ptl 11 Ir] I I% ANC[ 1521- 9118/2014 8 /01/2015 534,964 07 10 982 Years 3.1503851.% 3.2505505% 3.2265519% 3.1036653 1717__ 2,171,__ 33512772% City of Mound, Minnesota $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A Improvement Bonds Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Significant Dates 9/18/2014 Dated .___ -.... _ .___.___ - __.- _.__.______ -_ ---- 105% of Pint Coupon Date Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +l Total Assessments Levy /(Surplus) 02/01/2015 02/01/2016 35,00000 0700% - 24,369.26 59,36926 62,337,72 22,441.76 39,89596 02/01/2017 45,000,00 1000% 17,550 00 62,550.00 65,677 50 22,441 75 43,235 75 02/01/2018 45,00000 1.250% 17,10000 62,10000 65,205.00 22,44176 42,76324 02/01/2019 45,00000 1.550% 16,537.50 61,53750 64,61438 22441.76 _ 42.17262 (12/01/2020 45,00000 1.850% 15,840.00 60,840.00 63,88200 22,43176 4),44024 02/01/2021 45,000.00 2150% 15,007.50 60,007.50 63,007.88 22,44175 40,566.13 02101/2022 45,00000 2350% 14,040.00 59,04000 61,992.00 2244176 39,55024 02/01/2023 50,00000 2600% 12,982.50 62,98250 66,131.63 22,441.75 43,689.88 02/01/2024 50,00000 2700% 11682.50 6168250 64.76663 22A41 76 _42,324:87 02/01 /2625 50,000 00 2 85001. 10,332.50 60,33250 63,349 13 22,44175 40,907 38 02/0112026 50,000.00 2950% 8,90750 58907,50 61,852,88 22,44175 39,411.13 02/01/2027 55,00000 3150% 7,432.50 62,432.50 65,55413 22,44176 43,11237 02/01/2028 55,000 00 3250% 5,70000 60,700 00 63,735.00 22,441.75 41,293 25 02/01/2029 55,00000 3350% 3.91250 58,912.50 61,858.13 22,441,75 39:41638 02/G7/2030 60,00000 3450% 2,070,00 62,07000 1 42,731.74 Total 5730,000.00 - 5183,464.26 5913,464.26 5959,137.47 %336,626.33 5622,511.14 Significant Dates 9/18/2014 Dated .___ -.... _ .___.___ - __.- _.__.______ -_ ---- _ 8/01/2015 Pint Coupon Date Yield Statistics $6.464,69 __ _ -___ ._ -_.. .. Bond Year Dollars _ 8.856 Years Average Life 29379417% Averav Coupon 2.9621548% Net Interest Cost (NIC)- - - - - -- _ 2.9509144So :1 No Interest Cost (TIC) " 3.1036653% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes._ -- - "" 31083563% A11lnclusive CostfAIC) ._.__..____ ______ _ q,d-2014A GO UIl[iW & I improvement Bonds 1 7/512014 1 4,31 PM E 1-11LE RS -1522- City of Mound, Minnesota $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A Sewer Fund Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Significant Dates Dated First CoOgon Dmt Yield Statistic Aond Year Dollars A-mg. Net interest Cost (N_IC) Tme lntemelC at MCI Pnr Arbltcace Pt¢povs _ frond Ytela . All lndtuive Cost(AIC) _ 4444 IRS Form 9/18/2014 8/012015 $10,68250 1869 Years 32362873% 3.3289622% ].3084822% 3 1036653% 3 4346725 N4igWcd \ mg, blew t1 IL8001bnrs _ So -a 2014A 00 UCIIK &I Sower Fund 1 7/15/0014 14,31 P" E 1523 $051 Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Overlevy Fiscal Total 09/1312014 08/01/2015 - - 22,08389 22,08389 23,188.08 - 02/0 V2016 30,00000 0.700% 12,70000 42,700.00 44,83500 68,02308 08/01/2016 - - 12,59500 12,59500 13,224.75 - 02/01/2017 39.00D 00 1.000% 12,59500 - 47.595.00 49,974.75 _ 63,19950 4114 -1In 17 OR/Ol/2017 - - 12,420.00 12,42000 13,04100 - 02/0112018 35,00000 1250% 12,42000 47,42000 49,79100 62,83200 U8 /01/2018 - - 12,20125 12,201 25 12,811.31 - 02/01/2019 40,000w 1550% 12,20125 52201.25 54,81131 67,62263 os /01/2019 - - 11891.25 _ 1112 _ 11,891.25 _ _. __ 17A 95 hI - _ _ 1411 _ _.. - 4114 4144 _ _ 02/0112020 1141 .. _ 40,00900 _.. _ 1850 °'0 11,89125 51,891.25 54,485 91 66,9]163 08701/2020 - - 11,52125 11,52125 12,09731 - 02/0112021 40,00000 2150% 11 ,52125 51,52125 54,097.31 66,194 63 08/01/2021 - - 1109115 11,091.25 11,645.81 - O2OI12022 40.000.00 2350% 11.091.25 -_. - 5109125 _. _ 53,645.81 _ _ _ 1411 6529163 __. 4118 4144. 08/01/2022 4411 _. - - 10,62]25 10,621.25 ]1,15231 - 02/01/2023 40,000.00 2600% 10,62125 50,62125 53,15231 64,30463 08/01/2023 - - 10,10125 10,10125 10,60631 - 021Ol/2024 40,00000 2.700% 10,101.25 50,10125 526063) 63,21163 09/01[2024 - -_ 9,561.25 . _. - 9,56125 4141 _.. _. 10,03931 - 02/01/2025 45,000,00 2850% 9,56125 54,56125 57,28931 6],32863 08/0112025 - - 8,92000 8,92000 9,366.00 - 02A11206 45,00000 2950% 8,92000 53,92000 56,61600 65,98200 OR /OI/2026 - - 8,25625 8,25625 8,66906 - 02/0112n°7 45,00 00 3.150% 825625 .444__ 53.256.25 55. 919 06 64,588.13 .._144__ O8 /U 62027 - - 7,54].50 7,54].50 7,924.80 - 02A1/2028 45,000.00 3.250% 7,547.50 52,547,50 55,17488 63,099.75 08/01/2028 - 6,81625 6,81625 7,15706 - 02/01M129 50,000G3 3350% 6,81625 56,816,25 59,65706 66,814.13 08/01/2029 - 5,97875 .__._�_ 5.97875 _..__-_ __.6_277_69 ..._._.__._055._8. - .2 o 02/Dl/20J0 _ 1411..4144 50,00000 __ 3-050% 5,97375 55,97[2.75 5H ]77 GY 65,05538 08/01/2030 - - 5,11625 5,11625 5,37206 - 02/01/2031 50,000.00 3550% 5,11625 55,116.25 57,87206 63,244.13 08/0U2031 _ - 4,22875 422975 4,440]9 - 02/OIP2032 55,00000 3600% 4,22875 _._.__.._ 59,22875 _.__, 62,190.19 - 66,630.38 08/01/2032 - 4444___ - ;23875 3,238.]5 340069 - 02/01/2033 55000.00 3,650% 3,23875 56,23805 61,15069 64,55138 08101/2033 - - 223500 2,235,00 2,346.75 02101/2034 60,000 00 3.700% 2,235,00 62,235 00 65,346 75 67,693.50 0 08/01.'2 34 '. 4 1125 00 1.125.00 - 1,18125 1441 __ - 02/01/2035 60,00000 411. 3750`7.. _ 1,)25.00 61,12500 64,18125 65,362.50 T00a1 59001000.00 $345,716.39 51,245,716.39 $1.308,062.21 Significant Dates Dated First CoOgon Dmt Yield Statistic Aond Year Dollars A-mg. Net interest Cost (N_IC) Tme lntemelC at MCI Pnr Arbltcace Pt¢povs _ frond Ytela . All lndtuive Cost(AIC) _ 4444 IRS Form 9/18/2014 8/012015 $10,68250 1869 Years 32362873% 3.3289622% ].3084822% 3 1036653% 3 4346725 N4igWcd \ mg, blew t1 IL8001bnrs _ So -a 2014A 00 UCIIK &I Sower Fund 1 7/15/0014 14,31 P" E 1523 City of Mound, Minnesota $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A Water Fund Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Total 52595, 000,00 3995, 822,46 53,590,822.46 $3,770,363.58 Significant Dates 105% Date Principal Coupon Interest Total Pal Overlevy Fiscal Total _ 09/18/2014 - 330,783.71 - -__. ____ -_.... - 1, Aveage Coupon 08/0/2015 Net lmeresl Cost MICI 33276285% 63,68246 63,692,46 66,866.58 - 02/01=16 9000000 0700% 36,622.50 116,62250 122,453.63 189,3202) 0810112016 - - 36,34250 36,342 50 38,159.63 - 02101/2017 105,_000 00 1 000% 36.34250 141,342 50 _ _ 148,409 63 _ 186,569 25 08/012017 - 35,81750 35,817,50 37,60838 - 02/0IRO18 110'00000 1250% 3581750 145,817.50 153,10838 190,71675 08/01/2018 35,13000 35,13000 36,88650 - 02/01R019 110,0000), 1550% 35,730.00 145,130,00 152,38650 189,273.00 0 q /0).0,.. - 34,277,50 34,27750 3599138 - _- 6 /01/2020 110,00000 __. 1850 °0 3d,2D 50 ]44,2]750 ]51,49138 187,482.75 08/01/2020 - - 33,26000 33,260.00 34,92300 - 02/0112021 115,00000 2.150% 33,260.00 149,260.00 155,67300 190,596,00 08/01/2021 - - 32,023.75 32,023.75 33,62494 - 02101/2022 115,000,00 2350 %32,023.75 147.023,75 154,374,94 -. __ _ - _ 30,67250 30,672..50 32,206.13 - 02/012023 120,00000 2600% 30,672.50 150,672.50 158,206 13 190,41225 09;01/2023 - 29,11250 29,112.50 30,568.13 - 02/01/2024 126,000.00 2900% 29,112.50 149,11250 156,56813 18713625 08/0112024 _ 27,49250 _ 27, 492 50 _ _ _28,86713 02/01/2025 125,000.00 2.850% 27,49250 152,49250 160,11713 168,98425 09/01/2025 - - 25,711.25 25,711.25 26,996 81 - 0110 0026 130,00000 2950% 25,71125 155,71125 163496.81 190,49363 OWI)Ii226 - - 23,79355 23,79375 2498344 - 0210112027 130.000 00 3 15_09. _ 23,793 75 153799 75 �� -_- 161j485 44 _ 1 _ - -�� 9G41713 08!01/_027 _ j�,746 25 2j,746 25 22,833 56 02;01/2028 13.`.,00000 3250% 119,55250 120,530,13 18],417.13 OS /01/228 19,55250 OZ/O(/2029 140,000.00 3350% 19,552,50 159,55250 167,530.13 188,060.25 O9NI/2029 - 17207.50 . ____ _ 17,207.50 ___._.._ 18.06288 --170,317 . - -.. ___. _._.. 02/01/2030 145,000.00 .. _ ._. _. 3450% ]7,20750 762,20750 88 08/0)/2030 - - 14,706.25 14,706.25 15,441.56 - 02/01/2031 150,00000 3550% 14,70625 164,70625 172,94156 188,38313 08/0112031 - 12,043,75 12,043 75 12,645.94 - 02N1/2032 155,00000 3.600% 12,613.75 167,04375 _ 175395,94 _ 188.04188 08/019032 - - 9,253.75 9,25375 971644 - 02/01/2033 160,00000 3650% 9,253.75 169,25375 177,71644 187,43288 08/01/2033 - - 6,333.75 6,33375 6,65044 - 02/01/2034 165,000.00 3700% 6,333.75 171,33375 179,900.44 186,550,88 GR/01/7014 - - 3281.25 3,281,25 02/01/2035 _ 77500000 3 50% 3,281.25 178,28125 18],1953] 190,640.63 Total 52595, 000,00 3995, 822,46 53,590,822.46 $3,770,363.58 Significant Dates Yield Statistics Bond Ycar Dollars _- _ _ - -._. 330,783.71 - -__. ____ -_.... _ _ _ Avetxee I,re 1, Aveage Coupon 34 009% Net lmeresl Cost MICI 33276285% - -- lute C- TL 1 - __ __ _._ ,_ _ _ 33071918% - - -- d __ Band Yl- forAr-- s - _. ..____ B,u 3.1036653 - _._ - -__. _ _._.. Cost___,. ,Coos .. _____ -- -- - -- All Inclusive Cost rAICI___,___ ._._ 34334095 °'° IRS Form 8038 Not inmmst Cost - -_ - .._ ..._ __ -.- _ 009% Neiehted Amt,, Matwh, 11 863 Y _ ears tsn-e 2014A GO Jffll y 8 I Waw Fund 1 7/152014 1 4:31 PM EHLERS I -1524- of Mound, Minnesota $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A Storm Sewer Fund Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Significant Dates Dated Fht Coupo Dme Yield Statistics Bond Yev Dollazs Avca¢e Life Avemee Coupon 9/18/2014 8/01/2015 55.135 ]1 - 3.2327987% Net Interest Cw(NIC) _ _ 33259698'% 1,1,11 Tme lntuest Cost (TIC) 3 3043805 Bond Ytcld fo lvbtraBe Pupoaes - _ _ 31036653% _11, - -_ - _ All Tnolusive Cost (AIC) _24311641% IRS Form Cost eresl l NO nt oe /Ta l i 1111 _. - _ .. 11,1,1, 71,17 11,17. 1,1,1,1, 7111 1,11,.1, Weighted Avenge Maturity _. 11.806 Years 1,1,71 1,177 1177_ 111,1, _ .unoe 20t4A GO UEliy8 Slorm Seve/FUnd 19/15/2014 1 431 PM L F -1525- 105% Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Overlevy Fiscal Total 09/19/7014 - - - - - IWO 1201 s 10,624.61 10,624 61 11,155 84 02/01/2016 15,00000 0700% 6,11000 21,110.00 22,165.50 33,321.34 08 /01 /2016 - - 6,05750 6,05750 6,36038 - 02101/2017 11,00000 1.000% 6.05750 71 -- 7777 21,05750 . - -. "5677----- 22,110.38 28.470.75 --- - -___- 7777 111,1 711,1, 08 /01/2D17 - - _-- 7777 - 5,98250 5,90250 6,28163 02"23 1/2018 20,00"110 1250% 5,98250 25,9825D 27,28163 33,56325 08/012018 - - 5,857.50 5,857.50 6,150.38 - 02101/2019 20,00000 1550% 5857.5D 25857.50 27,150.38 33,3075 08D11,2019 - - _ _5702.50 5.70250_ _ 5:98763 - 02101/2020 20,00000 1850% 5,70250 25,70250 26,987,63 32,97525 081012020 - 5,517,50 531750 5,793.33 - 02/012021 20,00000 2150% 5,51750 25,51750 26,793,38 32,58675 08/012021 - - 5,30250 5,30250 5,567.63 02/01/2022 20,00000 2350% 5,30250- 25,30250 -- 26,567.63 _ 32,13525 .. 11,1,1.. _ _ 5,06750 5,32088 02/0112023 20,000.00 2600% 5,06750 25,067,50 26,320 98 3164175 08/01/2023 - - 4,807.50 4,80750 5,04788 - 02/01/2024 2000000 2700% 4,80750 24,80750 26,04708 31,095.75 08/01/2024 4,537.50 4537,50 _ 4,76438 02101/1025 20,00000 2.850% "53]50 - ^4,537.50 25,764.38 30,52875 08/01/2025 - - 4,25250 4,25250 4,465 13 - 02/01/2026 20'000.00 29505'6 4,252.50 24,2525D 25,465 -13 29,93025 08101/2026 - - 3,95250 3,957.50 4,15538 02/01/2027 2000000 3150% _ 395750 23,957.50 25,15538 29.310.75 11_ OA(01/2027 - - 3,64250 3,642.50 3,82463 - 02/01(2028 20,00000 3250% 364250 23,64250 24,82463 28,64925 03/01/2028 - - 3,31730 3,317.50 3,483.38 - 02/01/2029 25,00000 3350% 3,317.50 28,317,50 29,73338 33,21675 2,89875 289875 ....._.__.___.. 3.043 69 _08/01,2029 02/01/2030 25,OCJ 00 3,450% 2,898.75 27,89675 29,29369 32,337.38 08'11 1/2030 - - 2,467.50 2,467.50 2,59088 - 02/012031 2500000 3550 %, 2,467.50 27,467.50 28,84088 31,43175 08M/2031 - - 2,02375 2,023 75 2,12494 02/01/2032 25.00000 3500% 2,023,75 ._1,573_ 71,11, 27.02375 28.37494 1,111 30,49988 ___.-__ OS/01/2032 - - 1,573.75 1,573]5 1,65244 - 02/01/2033 25,0000 3.650% 1,573.75 26,573.75 27,902.44 29,554 88 08101/2033 - - 1,11750 1,11750 1,173.38 - 02/01/2034 30,00000 3,700% 1,117,50 31,117.50 32,67338 33,046_]5 08101/2034 17 562.50 562.50 565 590.63 _ -6812. 11,02/ .35 11 02/01/2035 1 1 30,00000 0 '+750% 56250 30,562,50 32,09063 32 32,68125 Tole] $435,000.00 5166,027.11 5601,027.11 5631,098.47 Significant Dates Dated Fht Coupo Dme Yield Statistics Bond Yev Dollazs Avca¢e Life Avemee Coupon 9/18/2014 8/01/2015 55.135 ]1 - 3.2327987% Net Interest Cw(NIC) _ _ 33259698'% 1,1,11 Tme lntuest Cost (TIC) 3 3043805 Bond Ytcld fo lvbtraBe Pupoaes - _ _ 31036653% _11, - -_ - _ All Tnolusive Cost (AIC) _24311641% IRS Form Cost eresl l NO nt oe /Ta l i 1111 _. - _ .. 11,1,1, 71,17 11,17. 1,1,1,1, 7111 1,11,.1, Weighted Avenge Maturity _. 11.806 Years 1,1,71 1,177 1177_ 111,1, _ .unoe 20t4A GO UEliy8 Slorm Seve/FUnd 19/15/2014 1 431 PM L F -1525- City of Mound, Minnesota $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A Equipment Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Total 5345,000.00 $40,549.62 $385,549.62 $404,827.10 - Significant Dates Dated _ 9/18/2014 rust Coupon Date 8/01/2015 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollarsn Average Life .. 5.500 Years Average Coupon 105% Net Interest Cost {NIC) Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +l Overlevy Fiscal Total 09/18/2014 - Net Interest Cost - - 5 500 Years " 08/01/2015 - - 5,48837 5,488.37 5,76279 - 02/01/2016 35,00000 0700°/ 3,15625 38,156.25 40,064.06 45,826.85 08/01/2016 - - 3,03175 3,033 75 3,185,44 - 02/0112017 35,00000 1.000% - _3,03375 _ 38,03375 ,.__.39,93544 43,120.88 08/01/2017 - - 2,858.75 2,85&75 3,00169 - 02/01/2018 35,000.00 1 250% 2,858 75 37,858 75 39,751 69 42,753.38 08/01/2018 - - 2,640.00 2,640.00 2,772.00 - 02/01/2019 40,00000 1.550�i6 2,640,00 42,64000 44,77200 47,54400 08/01/2019 - - 2,330.00 233000 -_ 2,446.50 02/01/2020 40,00000 1850% 2,330.00 42,33000 44,44650 46,893.00 08/03/2020 - - 1,96000 1,960.00 2,058.00 - 02/01/2021 40,00000 2150% 1,96000 41,96000 44,058.00 46,11600 08/01/2021 - - 1,53000 1,53000 1,606.50 - 02/01/2022 40,00000 2350% _ _ 1,530.00 4153000 43,60650 45,21300 ___ 08/01/2022 - - 1,060.00 1,06000 1,113.00 - 02/01/2023 4000000 2600% 1,06000 4] 06000 43,113.00 44,226.00 08/0112023 - - 540,00 540.00 56700 - 02/01/2024 40,00000 2700% 540.00 40,54000 42,56700 43,134.00 Total 5345,000.00 $40,549.62 $385,549.62 $404,827.10 - Significant Dates Dated _ 9/18/2014 rust Coupon Date 8/01/2015 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollarsn Average Life .. 5.500 Years Average Coupon 2.1370493% Net Interest Cost {NIC) 2,3370537% -- -' -' -" _ - - 2.3389031% _ Band Yield for Arbitrage Purposes _ 3.1036653 All inclusive Cost (AIC) _. _. - ,. 2,3389031% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost _ 2 1370493% Weighted Average Maturity 5 500 Years Series 2014A GO Uil111y8 1 Equipment 1 7/1512014 1 4.31 PM EHLERS , I .-.,_i ` P, i nr' :..,.. ,. 1526 City of Mound, Minnesota $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A Assessments Equal P &I - 2% over TIC Assessments Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +l 12/31/2015 10,87227 4950% 11,569 49 22,441 76 12/31/2016 1141045 4950% 11,03130 22,441.75 12/31/2017 11,97526 4950% 10,466.50 22,441.76 12/31/2018 12,568.04 4950% 9,873.72 22,44176 12/31/2019 13,19016 4_950% ____ 9,25160 ,.. .,..,,.22,441.76 12/312/31/2626 13,843.07 4.95 0% 8,598.68 22,441.75 12/31/2021 14,52830 4.950% 7,91346 22,441,76 12/31/2022 15,247,45 4,95000% 7,19430 22,44175 12/31/2023 16,00120 4.950% 6,439.56 22,44176 12/31/2024 16,79431 4.950% 5,64744 22.441.75 12/31/2025 17,62563 4.950% 4,816.12 22,441.75 12/3112026 18,498.10 4950% 3,943.66 22,441.76 12131/2027 19,413 75 4950% 3,028.00 22,441.75 12/31/2028 20,374.73 4.950% 2,06702 22,441 75 12133/2029 21,383.28 4.950% _1,058.48 __ 22,441.76 Total 8233,727.00 8102,899.33 $336,626.33 Siqnificant Dates Filine Date First Pavmeelt Date Seres2014A GO UU419 I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 7!15!201414:30 PM EHLERS I "1 I.I1;1 ", -1527- _ 1/01/2015 12/31/2015 City of Mound, Minnesota $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A Issue Summary Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps Detail Costs Of Issuance Dated 09/1812014 1 Delivered 09118/2014 COSTS OF ISSUANCE DETAIL Financial Advisor $35,00400 _ __.. Bond Counsel _ $12.000,00 Rating Agency Fm (S&P) Miscellaneous $1,00000 TOTAL $55,000.00 Series 2014A GO J141*/ B l Issue Summary 1 711512014 1 4:31 PM EHLERS I li, _ i14 ,. "F" -1528- July 22, 2014 City of Mound, Minnesota Series 2014B Prepared by: Stacie Kvilvang Senior Financial Advisor _m, Jason Aarsvold Financial Advisor -1529- EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FIN.ANCF Executive Summary of Proposed De Proposed Issue $3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B Purposes. ( The proposed issue includes financing for the following purposes: Current refunding of the 2005A and 2005B Bonds. The 2005A bonds were issued to finance the 2005 street reconstruction projects. The 2005B bonds were issued finance 2005 water projects, including a 400,000 gallon water tower at Chateau. Both series of bonds are callable now, and refunding the bonds will produce interest savings. Proposed current refunding of the Series 2005A and 2005B Bonds. Debt service will be paid from special assessments, utility revenues and tax levy. Interest rates on the obligations proposed to be refunded are 4.0% to 4.40 %. The refunding is expected to reduce interest expense by approximately $297,329 over the next 12 years. The Net Present Value Benefit of the refunding is estimated to be $267,337, equal to 8.277% of the refunded principal. This refunding is considered to be a Current Refunding as the obligations being refunded are callable (pre - payable) now. Authority: The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters: f 429 s 444 475 Because the City is assessing at least 20% of the project costs, the Bonds can be a general obligation without a referendum and will not count against the City's debt limit. Chapter 444 allows cities to issue debt without limitation as long as debt service is expected to be paid from water and sewer revenues. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith, credit and taxing powers are pledged. Term /Call Feature: The Bonds are being issued for a 12 year term (existing term). Principal on the Bonds will be due on February 1 in the years 2015 through 2026. Interest is payable every six months beginning February 1, 2015. The Bonds maturing on and after February 1, 2023 will be subject to prepayment at the discretion of the City on February 1, 2022 or any date thereafter. Bank Qualification: Because the City is issuing less than $10,000,000 in the calendar year, the City will be able to designate the Bonds as "bank qualified" obligations. Bank Presale Report — 2014BBonds -1530- July 22, 2014 City of Mound, Minnesota Page 1 Presale Report — 2014BBonds -1531- July 22, 2014 City of Mound, ]Minnesota Page 2 status broadens the market for the Bonds, which can result in lower qualified interest rates. — — Rating: The City's most recent bond issues were rated "AA" by Standard & Poor's. The City will request a new rating for the Bonds. If the winning bidder on the Bonds elects to purchase bond insurance, the rating for the issue may be higher than the City's bond rating in the event that the bond rating of the insurer is higher than that of the City. Based on our knowledge of your situation, your objectives communicated to Basis for Recommendation: us, our advisory relationship as well as characteristics of various municipal financing options, we are recommending the issuance of General Obligation Refunding Bonds as a suitable financing option because this is the most overall cost effective option that still maintains future flexibility for the repayment of debt. Method of Sale /Placement In order to obtain the lowest interest cost to the City, we will solicit competitive bids for purchase of the Bonds from local banks in your area and regional underwriters. We have included an allowance for discount bidding equal to 1.00000% of the principal amount of the issue. The discount is treated as an interest item and provides the underwriter with all or a portion of their compensation in the transaction. If the Bonds are purchased at a price greater than the minimum bid amount (maximum discount), the unused allowance may be used to lower your borrowing amount. Premium Bids: Under current market conditions, most investors in municipal bonds prefer "premium" pricing structures. A premium is achieved when the coupon for any maturity (the interest rate paid by the issuer) exceeds the yield to the investor, resulting in a price paid that is greater than the face value of the bonds. The sum of the amounts paid in excess of face value is considered "reoffering premium." The amount of the premium varies, but it is not uncommon to see premiums for new issues in the range of 2.00% to 10.00% of the face amount of the issue. This means that an issuer with a $2,000,000 offering may receive bids that result in proceeds of $2,040,000 to $2,200,000. For this issue of Bonds we have been directed to use the premium to reduce the size of the issue. The adjustments may slightly change the true interest cost of the original bid, either up or down. You have the choice to limit the amount of premium in the bid specifications. This may result in fewer bids, but it may also eliminate large adjustments on the day of sale and other uncertainties. Review of Existing Debt: We have reviewed all outstanding indebtedness for the City and find that other than the obligations proposed to be refunded by the Bonds, there are no Presale Report — 2014BBonds -1531- July 22, 2014 City of Mound, ]Minnesota Page 2 other refunding opportunities at We will continue to monitor the market and the call dates for the City's outstanding debt and will alert you to any future refunding opportunities. Continuing Disclosure: Because the City has more than $10,000,000 in outstanding debt (including this issue) and this issue is over $1,000,000, the City will be agreeing to provide certain updated Annual Financial Information and its Audited Financial Statement annually as well as providing notices of the occurrence of certain "material events" to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the "MSRB), as required by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The City is already obligated to provide such reports for its existing bonds, and has contracted with Ehlers to prepare and file the reports. Arbitrage Monitoring: Because the Bonds are tax- exempt securities /tax credit securities, the City must ensure compliance with certain Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rules throughout the life of the issue. These rules apply to all gross proceeds of the issue, including initial bond proceeds and investment earnings in construction, escrow, debt service, and any reserve funds. How issuers spend bond proceeds and how they track interest earnings on funds (arbitrage /yield restriction compliance) are common subjects of IRS inquiries. Your specific responsibilities will be detailed in the Nonarbitrage Certificate prepared by your Bond Attorney and provided at closing. We recommend that you regularly monitor compliance with these rules and /or retain the services of a qualified firm to assist you. Risk Factors: Special Assessments: We have not assumed any pre -paid special assessments and we have assumed that assessments will be levied as projected. If the City receives a significant amount of pre -paid assessments, it may need to increase the levy portion of the debt service to make up for lower interest earnings than the expected assessment interest rate. Utility Revenue: The City expects to pay the Bonds with utility funds. If utility revenue is inadequate, the City will need to increase utility rates to make the scheduled payments, which may require the City to levy taxes to pay debt service on in interim basis. Current Refunding: The Bonds are being issued for the purpose of current refunding prior City debt obligations. Those prior debt obligations are "callable" now and can therefore be paid off within 90 days or less. The new Bonds will not be pre - payable until February 1, 2021 This refunding is being undertaken based in part on an assumption that the City does not expect to have future revenues to pay off this debt and that market conditions warrant the refinancing at this time. This presale report summarizes our understanding of the City's objectives for the structure and terms of this financing as of this date. As additional facts become known or capital markets conditions change, we may need to modify the structure and/or terms of this financing to achieve results consistent with the City's objectives. Presale Report — 2O14BBonds -1532- July 22, 2014 City of Mound, Minnesota Page 3 Proposed Debt Issuance Schedule Pre -Sale Review by City Council July 22, 2014 — Jason Aarsvold Distribute Official Statement: Week of August 11, 2014 (651) 697 -8566 g Agency: Week of August 18`h to Award Sale of the Bonds: 7CIosing August 26, 2014 e: September ] 8, 2014 Redemption Date for 2005A Bon ds October 1, 2014 Redemption Date for 2005B Bonds October 1, 2014 Attachments Sources and Uses of Funds Proposed Debt Service Schedule Refunding Savings Analysis Resolution Authorizing Ehlers to Proceed With Bond Sale Ehlers Contacts Financial Advisors: Stacie Kvilvang (651) 697 -8506 Jason Aarsvold (651) 697 -8512 Disclosure Coordinator: Jen Chapman (651) 697 -8566 Financial Analyst: Alicia Gage (651) 697 -8551 The Official Statement for this financing will be mailed to the City Council at their home address or e- mailed for review prior to the sale date. Presale Report — 2014BBonds -1533- July 22, 2014 City of Mound, Minnesota Page 4 Resolution No. Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution Providing for the Sale of $3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B (the "Bonds "), to finance the current refunding of the 2005A and 2005B Bonds in the City; and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "), as its independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meeting' Proposal Openin . The City Council shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on August 26, 2014, for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds. 3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by City Council Member and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following City Council M_ embers voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 22nd day of July, 2014. -1534- City Clerk City of Mound, Minnesota $3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 20148 Issue Summary - Current Ref 05A & 05B Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 09118/20141 Delivered 09M812014 CR 2005A CR 2005B GO GO Impry Wtr Rev Issue Bonds Bonds Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $970,070.00 $2.350,000.00 53,32[1,000 .00 Total Sources 5970,000.00 82,350,000,00 33,320,000.00 Uses Of Funds Total Undewitets Discount (2.000 /) Costs aflssuance 9,05223 . Deposit to Current Refundine Fund _ _ _ 946.435 42 _ Rounding Amount 4,807.35 Total Uses $970,000.00 Series 2014 B GO Refunding l Issue Summary 1 7/1512014 1 9,03 AM EHLERS -1535 - 21,942.77 31000.00 2.306,155 42 3.2521590. R4 (1598.19) 720916 52,350,000.00 S3,320,0110.00 City of Mound, Minnesota $3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 20148 Issue Summary - Current Ref 05A & 05B Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Fiscal Total 09/18/2014 02/01/2015 - 285,00000 ' 0550% - 21,57279 - 306,572,79 306,572.79 08/01/2015 - - 28,412 50 28,412 50 02/01/2016 320,00000 0.700% 28,412.50 348,412.50 376,82500 08/0_1/2016 - - 27,29250 27292.50 02/01/2017 320,000 00 1,000% 27,292.50 347,292 50 374,585 00 - 25,69250 25,69250 - 08/01/2017 0270112018 - 325,000 00 1 25096 25,692 50 350,692 50 376,385 00 08/0112018 - - 23,661 25 23,661.25 - 02/01/2019 330.000 00 1.550% 2166125 _ _ 353,661 25 _ _ _ 377.322 50 08/01/2019 - 21,103.75 21,10375 - 02/01/2020 340,00000 1850% 21,10375 361,10375 382,207 50 08/0112020 - - 17,958 75 17,95875 - 02/01/2021 340,000.00 2.150% 17,958.75 357,95875 375,91750 08101/2021 - - 14,303.75 14,30375 02/01/2022 200,000.00 2350% 14,30375 214,303,75 228,607.50 08/01/2022 - - 11,95375 31,953.75 - 02/03/2023 205,000 00 2 600% 11,953 75 216,953 75 228,907.50 08/01/2023 - - 9,28875 9,28875 - 02/01/2024 210,000.00 2700% _. 9,28875 _ _2.19,288 75 _. 228,577 50 08/01/2024 - 6,453.75 6,45375 02101/2025 220,000.00 2 850% 6,453 75 226,453 75 232,907.50 08/01/2025 - 3,318 75 3,318 75 - 02/0112026 225,000 00 2950% 3,31875 228,318 75 231,637.50 Total 83,320,000.00 $400,452.79 53,720,452.79 Yield Statistics Bond Year Bel Iars _ _ $17,826.56 5.369 Years AvmeLife __ _. —. - . —.____ . —_ ..._..._._ Aeeaee Coupon 22463834% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 2,4326224 �° _- - -___ — '-.... _ 2 4293193 °,b True Interest CostifK'7 _ _ - -. -- .- -- - - - - - - --- Bond Yield for Arlatrage Purposes -� 2,2265636% All Inclusive Cost (AIC) _ 2 6214713 °% IRS Maturity Se6as20146GOR.1uId1r9 I Issue Summary 1 7/15/2014 1 9;03AM EHLERS 1 IADI!IS IN MITI 11 I'll "E -1536- 5 369 Years City of [Mound, Minnesota $3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B Issue Summary - Current Ref 05A & 05B Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Net Debt Service Schedule Fiscal Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Net New D/S Total 09/1812014 - - - (3,209.16) - 02/01/2015 285 000.00 0.550% 21 572.79 306,572.79 306,572.79 303,363 63 08/01/2015 - - 28,41150 28,412.50 28,412.50 - 02/01/2016 320,00000 0.700% 28,412 50 348 412.50 348,412.50 376,825.00 08/01/2016 - -_ 2720 27,29250 27,292.50 - 02/01 /2017 320,000 00 1,000% 27,292 50 347,292 50 347,291-50 374,585 00 08/01/2017 - - 25,692.50 25,69250 25,692 50 - 02101/2018 325,000 00 1250% 25,692 50 350,692.50 350,692 50 376,385.00 08/0112018 - - 23,661 25 23,661.25 23,66] 25 - 02/01/2019 330 000 00 1.550% 23,661.25 .� 353,661.25 353,661 25 377,322.50 1311___ _. 1333. 3111. 08/01/2019 _ __. 1113. - 21,10375 21,10375 21,103.75 - 02/01/2020 340,00000 1,850% 21,103,75 361,103.75 361,103.75 382,207 50 08/01/2020 - - 17,9505 17,95875 17,95875 - 02/01/2021 340,00000 2150% 17,958,75 357958.75 357,95875 375,917.50 08/01/2021 - - 14,303.75 — ._1303__. 14.303.75 3313. 14,303.75 - _._ 02/01/2022 200,000.00 3111 2350% 1 §,303,75 214,303.75 214,30375 228,60750 08/01/2022 - - 11,95375 11,95375 11,953.75 - 02/01/2023 205,00000 2600% 11,953.75 216,95375 216,95375 228,907.50 08/01/2023 - - 9,288.75 9,288.75 9,288.75 - 02/01/2024 210.000 00 2700% 9,288.75 2.19288.75 219.288.75 228.577.50 08/01/2024 - - 6,453 75 6,453.75 6,453 75 - 02/0112025 2201000,00 _^ 850% 6,453.75 226,453.75 226,453.75 232,907 50 08/01/2025 - - 3,318.75 3,318 75 3,318.75 - 02/01/2026 225,000.00 2950% 3,318.75 228,31875 228,318.75 231,637.50 Total 53,320,000.00 - S400,452.79 53,720,452.79 53,717,243.63 - Series 2014B GO Relu,Oing I lm Summary [7!15!201419:03 AM EHLERS isr.t�E H.`.I JI9 u: Hi,LALf'. -1537— City of Mound, Minnesota $3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B Issue Summary - Current Ref 05A & 056 Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Debt Service Comparison Date Total P +I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2019 306,572.79 303,36163 337,772.50 34,408.87 27,920.00 02/01/2016 376,825.00 376,825,00 404,745.00 403,54500 28,960.00 02/01/2017 374,585.00 374 585.00 376,385.00 406,78000 30,39500 02101/2018 376,38500 377,322 50 377,322.50 404.275 00 26.952.50 02/01/2019 - - - - 382,20N7.57.5 0 _ -- 382,207,50 406,360.00 24,15250 02/01/2020 375,917.50 375,917.50 402,335 00 26,417.50 02/01/2021 228,60750 228,607.50 247,88500 19277.50 02/01/2022 229,907 50 228,907,50 249,385 00 20,477 50 02/01/2023 02/01/2024 228,577.50 228577.50 250,25000 21,672.50 02/01/2025 232,907.50 232,90750 250,680 00 250,56000 17,M 50 18,92250 mmi nn9A 23163250 231,637.50 - Total 53,720,452.79 $3,717,243.63 54,014,572.50 52Y7,3ztl.n7 PV Anal sis Summary (Net to Net) 264,127.71 Gross PV Debt Scrvice Savings _.c._:, =_.. ____— .— ._______ _.__. ___.___— ____ —__ —. Net PV CashflOW Savings (a) 2 227 94VBond Yield)._.. 264'127.71 3 209.16 Contingency or Rounding Amount _.. - - -_ $267,336.87 Net Present Value Benefit - - -- -� _ - -- - - ---- " —" - "' - -" '"" Nat PV Benefit /S3 5n9 420 15 PV Ref unded Debt Service 7.490% ..___. .. _._._ -___ _ —_ % 8.277% Net PV Benefit / $3-230,000 Refunded Principal _. — - -- -- - -- -- 8052% Net PV Benefit / $3_320000 Refunding Principal __. __..__..__..__.._ _..,_.. Refunding Bond Information 9/18/2014 Refunding Dated Data _._.._ 9/18/2014 Refund ing Del ivey Date _ ._. _____... .. __ _ _._.. - .. _ __- __._.. s >nes. 20145 GO Rufundn9 I Issue Summary 1 7/1512014 1 9:03 AM EHLERS t,.�N�', :; �: ' ,,,,,:t -1538- City of Mound, Minnesota $3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B Issue Summary - Current Ref 05A & 05B Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Current Refunding Escrow Date Rate Receipts Disbursements Cash Balance 09/19 /2014 - 3,252,590.84 - 3.252,590 84 10101/2014 - - 3,252,590.84 - Total S3,252,590.84 53,252,590.84 - Investment Parameters Investment Model rpv, GIC, or Securities] _. _ __ _ _ Securities Default investmentvield target Unrestricted Cash Deposit ._._. - -. Total Cost of Investments, Target Cost of Investments at bond yield _.,._. —_ ,.1111' Act ualpositiv -or (negative) arbnrn &e Yield to Recoint Yield for fvbilrage Purposes _ __ ___ State and Local Covemmem Series (SLGS) rates for_ Series 20148 GO Returning I issue Summary 1 7/15/2014 1 9:03 AM 3,252 590.84 1590_._ 53252.590.84 ._.�_. $3,249,991.13 _ _ 1111 -_ 1111.111.1 (2,599.71) --- _ ---- - -- 2 2265636% 5/21/2014 EHLERS -1539 - lL City of Mound, Minnesota $3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 20148 Issue Summary - Current Ref 05A & 05B Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Detail Costs Of Issuance Dated 0911.812014 1 Delivered 09/18/2014 COSTS OF ISSUANCE DETAIL Series 2014B GO Refunding I Issue Summary 1 7/1512014 1 9:03 AM EHLERS -1540 - 1tYJM1FS It, I' !Wt iCI NRlQ:L $n.000.00 Financial Advisor(L61en &Associates) - - - -. — ..— ._ $9.000.00 Bond Counsel (13npgs and Morgan) _ .._ - _ -- -.. - -- -- - -- — — $4.00000 Rating Agency � F . -. $1000.00 miscellaneous _ .. .___... __.._ _.... __.i. $31.000.00 TOTAL Series 2014B GO Refunding I Issue Summary 1 7/1512014 1 9:03 AM EHLERS -1540 - 1tYJM1FS It, I' !Wt iCI NRlQ:L City of (Mound, Minnesota $970,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B CR 2005A GO Impry Bonds Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Total P +I Fiscal Total 09/18/2014 - - - - 02/01/2015 125,000.00 0.550% 4,705.80 129,705.80 129,705.80 08/01/2015 - - 6,025.00 6,025.00 - 02/01/2016 140,000 00 0.700% 6,025.00 146,025.00 152 050.00 08101/2016 - 5.53500 5.535 00 - ____ 20 _ 02/01/17 135,000.00 1.000/ 5,53500 140,535.00 146,070,00 08/01/2017 - - 4,860.00 4,86000 - 02/01 /2018 140,000.00 1250% 4,86000 144,86000 149,72000 08/01/2018 - - 3,985.00 3,98500 - 02/01/2019 140.00000 1550% 3.98500 14.3,98500 147,970.00 08/016019 - - 2,90000 2,900.00 - 02/01/2020 145,000 00 1850% 2,90000 147,900 00 150,800.00 08i01/2020 - - 1,558.75 1,558.75 - 02/01/2021 145,00000 2150% 1,55875 146,558.75 148,11750 Total $970,000.00 554,433.30 $1,024,433.30 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars _ _,. _ _ _._ $3,34336 _ Average Life 3447 Years Average Coupon _ 16281011% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 1 9182283% Two Interest Cost (TIC) 19258233% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Pumoses 2 2265636% All Inclusive Cost (A1C) 22133467% 8038 Net Interest Cost Weighted Average Maturity. Series20146G0Refu,dinp I CR2005AGOhPIB -ds 1 71158014 1 9;03AM EHLERS -1541 - city of Mound, Minnesota $970,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B CR 2005A GO Impry Bonds Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Net Debt Service Schedule nnuo nn P,( —Knn I CR 2005A GO IMON BOOds 1 71152014 1 9:03 AM EHLERS -1542- 1I'X@ n.% IN 1 "1 11'; HI :;,`,:a Fiscal Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Net New D/S Total - - (4,807 35) - 09/18/2014 02/01/2015 - 12500000 0550% 4,705.80 129,70580 129,705.80 124,898.45 U8/01/2015 - - 6,02500 6,02500 6,02500 - 02/01/2016 140,000 00 0.700% 6,025.00 146,025 00 146,025.00 152,050.00 08101/2016 5,53500 5,535 00 5,535.00 - /20 02/0717 ]35,00000 1000% 5535.00 140,53500 140,53500 1 08/01/2017 - - 4,86000 4,860,00 4,860.00 - 02/01/2018 140,000 00 1250% 4,86000 144,860.00 144,860,00 149,720.00 08/01/2018 - - 3,99500 3,985.00 3,985 00 143,985.00 - 147;970.00 02/01/2019 140.00000 1550% _ _ 3.98500_ _ _,__143,985.00 2,90000 _ _. 2,900,00 08/01/2019 145,000.00 1.850% 2,900.00 2,900.00 147,90000 147,90000 150,800.00 02101/2020 1,55875 1,558 75 1,558.75 - 08101/2020 02/01/2021 145,00000 2,150% 1,558.75 146,55875 146,558.75 148,11750 Total 5970,000.00 $54,433.30 51,024,433.30 51,074,625.95 - nnuo nn P,( —Knn I CR 2005A GO IMON BOOds 1 71152014 1 9:03 AM EHLERS -1542- 1I'X@ n.% IN 1 "1 11'; HI :;,`,:a City of Mound, Minnesota $970,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B CR 2005A GO Impry Bonds Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Debt Service Comparison Date Total P +I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 02/01/2015 129,705.80 124,898.45 139,306.25 14,407.80 02/01/2016 152,05000 152,050.00 158,812.50 6,762.50 02/01/2017 146,070.00 146,07000 153,812.50 7,742.50 02/01/2018 149,720,00 149,720 00 158,812 50 9,092 50 02/01/2019 147970.00 147,97000 158,27750 1030750 02/01/2020 150,800.00 150,800 00 157,537.50 6,73750 02/01/2021 148,117.50 148,11750 156,37500 8,25750 Total $1,024,433.30 $1,019,625.95 $1,082,933.75 $63,307.80 PV Analysis Summary (Net to Nett Gross PV Debt Service Savings.. .. _. 54,76399 Net PV Cashflow Savings n 2227 %(Bond Yield)._ 54.76399 Contiogencv or Rounding Amount _ 4,80735 Net Present Value Benefit $59,571.34 Net PV Benefit / $1.005,593 51 PV Refunded Debt Service _ _ _ 5.924% Net PV Benefit / $940,000 Refunded Principal _. _ 6.337% Net PV Benefit/ $9700001 vIundmP Principal _ 6.141% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date Refunding De (very Date Boner 20145 GO Refunding CR 2005A GO ImoN Bonds 1 711512014 1 9:03 AM EHLERS -1543 - 9/18/2014 9/1812014 City of Mound, Minnesota $970,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 20148 CR 2005A GO Impry Bonds Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Current Refunding Escrow Cash Date Rate Receipts Disbursements Balance 09118/2014 - 946,435.42 - 946,435.42 - 946,435.42 10/01/2014 - Total - $946,435.42 $946,435.42 - Investment Parameters Llvestment Model (PV, GIC, or Securities] - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- Securities _ .. - - - -- Unrestricted Default invesnentyield target Cash Deposit Total Costoflnvestments - ___ -- .. - - -- - - - -- Target Cost of Investments at bond yield, Actual_ positive or (nrfpuvc)arbttrnge _ ___,_. — Yield to Receipt __. Yield for Arbitrage Purposes Senor 20146 GO Refunding I CR 2005A GO Impry Bonds 1 715/2014 1 903 AM EHLERS -1544- ,i"D ,i : W PUri.l; I'I b t,4"I 946A35.42 -„ $946,43542 $945,678.96 (756.46) 22265636% City of Mound, MN $1,765,000 GO Improvement Bonds, Series 2005A Total Refunded Debt Service Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +1 Fiscal Total 02/01/2015 120,000,00 4000% 19,30625 139,30625 139,30625 08/01/2015 - - 16,906,25 16,906.25 - 02/01/2016 125,000.00 4.000% 16,906.25 141,90625 158,812.50 08101/2016 - - 14,40625 14,406.25 - 02/01/2017 12500000 .,4000%__,,._,_____14,406.25_._ _ 139,406,25 153,812,50 08/01/2017 -.. - 11,90625 11,906.25 - 02/01/2018 135,00000 4.100% 11,90625 146,90625 158,81250 08/01/2018 - - 9,138.75 9,138.75 - 02/01/2019 140,000.00 4.100% 9,138,75 149,13875 158,27750 08/01/2019 - 6.268 75 6 268 75 - 02/01/2(120 145,000 00 - 4.250% 6,268.75 151,268.75 157,537.50 08/01/2020 - - 3,187 50 3,18750 - 02/01/2021 150,000.00 4.250% 3,187.50 153,187.50 156,37500 Total $940,000.00 - 5142,933.75 $1,082,933.75 - Yield Statistics Base date for Avg Life&: Avg Coupon Calculation Average Life Average Coupon Wcighted Average MaWtv(ParBasis)_ ------ Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date Refunding DeUvery Date _._ ... 2005A CO impry eds CR RI I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 711512014 1 9:03 AM EHLERS -1545 - II 16P1'bL' „I' Pof 9/18/2014 3 524 Years 4 1630769% 3.524 Years 9/182014 9/18/2D14 City of Mound, MN $1,765,000 GO Improvement Bonds, Series 2005A Debt Service To Maturity And To Call Yield Statistics Refunded Refunded 9/182014 30.30_...__ As er u;c Life — 3 524 Years 3030 _. 30.69 . — _ .3030.. .3030___ _. _ Refunded Date Bonds Interest D/S To Call Principal Coupon Interest D/S 09/18/2014 - .,_ 3030. _ Refund,uf Delivery Date _ 30.------ 10101/2014 940,00000 6,43542 94643542 02/01/2015 - - - MAO 00 4000% 19,30625 139,306.25 - - 16,90625 16,906.25 08/01/2015 - - - - 12500000 4.000% 16.90625 141,906.25 _02/01/2016 _ _. - ... _. - .3030_.. - - _ - _ ... 3030.. 74,40625 3030__ -30.30 14,406.25 08l01/2016 - - 125,00000 4.000% 14,406.25 139,40625 02/01/2017 - - - - - 11,90625 11,90625 08/01/2017 - - - - 135,000.00 4.100% 11,90625 146,90625 02/01/2018 - - - - - 9,13875 9,13875 O8I01 /2018 _.3030_ -_ 3030 - - _. .3030__ 3030 - _... _... r__ 30.30... 140000.00 _ _ 3030 4100% _ _ 3030.__ 9,13975 — .3030... 149,138.75 02/01/2019 - - - - - 6,268 75 6,268.75 08/012019 - - - 145,00000 4,250% 6,2605 151,26875 02/01/2020 - - - - 3,187 50 3,187.50 08/01/2020 - - 150,000.00 4.250% 3,18750 153,18750 02/01/2021 - - .3030.___.. 30.....30._ Total $940,000.00 $6,435.42 $946,435.42 $940,000.00 - $142,933.75 $1,082,933.75 Yield Statistics Base date thr Avg Life & Ave Coupon Calculation 9/182014 30.30_...__ As er u;c Life — 3 524 Years 3030 _. 30.69 . — _ .3030.. .3030___ _. _ 4.1630769% Averaee Coupon ._ 30.30__ 30.30___. — _. — _.3030__ 3030. _._ 30_30 3.524 Years Weighted Averaee Maturitv(Par Basis) . Refunding Bondinformation Refunding Dated Date _ . 3030.._ 3030. _..�... 9/18/2014 3030— _ —. 3030_. _. 3030__ .,_ 3030. _ Refund,uf Delivery Date _ 30.------ 2005A GO MPv Bds CR 01 1 SINGE PURPOSE 1 711512014 1 9:03 AM EHLERS -1546 - City of Mound, Minnesota $2,350,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B CR 2005B GO Wtr Rev Bonds Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Fiscal Total 09/18/2014 - - - - - 02/01/2015 160,000.00 0550% 16,86699 176,866.99 176,86699 08/01/2015 - - 22,38750 22,387.50 - 02/0112016 180,000 00 0.700% 22,387 50 202,387.50 224,775 00 08/01/2016 - - 21,757.50 21,757,50 - 02/01/2017 165,000.00 1000/ 21,757.50 206,75750 228,51500 08/01/2017 - - 20,832.50 20,832.50 - 02/01/2018 185 000.00 1250% 20,832 50 205,83150 226,665.00 08/01/2018 - - 19,676.25 19,676.25 02/01/2019 190.000 00 1550% (8676 25 209.676 25 22935250 08/012019 - - 18,203 75 18,203 75 02/01/2020 195,000.00 1850% 18,203 75 213203.75 231,407.50 08/01/2020 - - 16,40000 16,400.00 - 02/01/2021 195,00000 2150% 16,40000 211,40000 227,800.00 08/01/2021 - -- 14,303 75 14,303 75 - 02/01/2022 200,000.00 2.350/ 14,303.75 214,30375 228,607.50 08/01/2022 - - 11,953 75 11,953 75 - 02/01/2023 205,000 00 2.600% 11,953 75 216,953 75 228,907 50 08/01/2023 - - 9,28875 9,28875 - ozrov2oz4 zlo.00000 v ° 7oor° �. __. �� -� _... 75 - 219,28875 ._.__- _.. 228,577.50 ... _..__.. 08/01/207,4 61453-7-5 6,453.75 - 02/01/2025 220,000.00 2 85000/ 6,453 75 226,453 75 232,907.50 08/01/2025 - - 3,318 75 3,318 75 - 02/01/2026 225,000.00 2.950% 3,31875 228,318.75 231,637.50 Total 82,350,000.00 $346,019.49 $2,696,019.49 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $14.483.19 Average Life 6 163 Years Average Coupon 2389,1103% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 25513673% True interest Cost ( fIC) 2.5498311% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Pumoses _ 2 2265636% All Inclusive Cost (A1C)_. 27194299% IRS Form ncuesr �,osi hied Average Maturity Series 2014B GO Refunding I OR 20058 GOWIr Rev Bonds 1 71152014 1 9 :03AM " :f C -1547- !1, t I f N.,Yp City of Mound, Minnesota $2,350,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B CR 2005B GO WIT Rev Bonds Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Net Debt Service Schedule Fiscal Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Net New D/S Total - - 1,598 19 - 09/18/2014 02/01 /2015 - 160,000.00 - 0550% 16,866.99 176,86699 176,866.99 178,465.18 08/01/2015 - - 22,38750 22,387.50 22,387.50 - 02/0172016 180,00000 0700% 22,38750 202,387,50 202,38750 224,775.00 08/01/2016 - - 21,75750 21757.50 2175750 :. 02/0W017 185,00() 00 _. 1000 % 21,757.50 206,757.50 206757.50 228,515.00 08/01/2017 - - 20,832.50 20,832.50 20,83250 - 02/01/2018 185,00000 1250% 20,832.50 205,832.50 205,832,50 226,665.00 08/01/2018 - - 19,67625 19676.25 19,676.25 - 02/01/2019 190,000.00 1550% 19,676.25 __ _ 209,676.25_ 209,676.25 _ 229.35250. _ - -� - - .___...... - _. _._. ' 18,203 75 18,203.75 18,203.75 - 02/01/2019 02/01/2020 195,000.00 1850% 18,20375 213,20375 2)3,203 75 231,407.50 08/01/2020 - 16,400,00 16,400.00 16,40000 - 02/01/2021 195,00000 2150% 16,40000 211,40000 211400.00 227,80000 08/0112021 - - _ 14,303.75 14,303 751 _ 14,30375 _ _ - 02/01/2022 '00,00000 _ 2350% 14,303.75 214,303 75 214,303 75 228,607.50 08/01/2022 - - 11,953.75 11,953.75 11,95375 - 02/01/2023 205,00090 2.600% 11,953.75 216,953 75 216,953.75 228,907 50 08/01/2023 - - 9,288.75 9,288.75 9,28875 - 02f01/2024 210000.00 2,700% 219.288.75 21'128875 228,57750 08/01/2024 - - 6,453 75 6,45375 6,453 75 - 02/01/2025 220,000 00 2.850% 6,453 75 226,453.75 226,453 75 232,907 50 08/01/2025 - - 3,318.75 3,31875 3,318 75 - rnro111mA 225000.00 2,950% 3,31875 228,318.75 228,318.75 231,63750 Total 82,350,000.00 - S�ab,utxay ac,oro,viv.•+� e•- rv�,••. •• -� C- iuo7nn4BGORefundlno I CR20058GOWVRev BOMB 1 7/15/2014 1 9o3AM EHLERS -1548 - City of Mound, Minnesota $2,350,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B CR 2005B GO Wtr Rev Bonds Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Debt Service Comparison Date Total P +1 Net New D/S Old Net D!S Savings 02101/2015 176,866.99 178,465.18 198,466 25 20,001 07 02/01/2016 224,775.00 224,775.00 245,932 50 21,157 50 02/01/2017 228,515.00 228,515.00 249,732.50 21,21750 02/01/2018 226,66500 226665.00 247,967.50 21,30250 02/01/2019 229.352.50 _._ 229,35250 245,99750 16.645.00 02/01/2020 231,40750 231,40750 248,82250 17,4]500 02/01/2021 227,800 00 227,800 00 245,960.00 18,160.00 02/01/2022 228,607 50 228,607.50 247,885 00 19,27750 02/012023 228,907.50 228,907.50 249,385 00 20,477,50 02/01/2024 228,577.50 228.577 50 250,250,00 _ 21,672.50 02/012025 232,907.50 232,907 50 250,680.00 17,772.50 02/012026 231,637 50 231,637 50 250,560 00 18,922 50 Total $2,696,019.49 $2,697,617.68 $2,931,638.75 $234,021.07 PV Analysts Summary (Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Sayings Net PV Cashflovv Savings fa) 2.227 ;,(Brn d Yield) ConiinEency or Roundin f Amount Net Present Value Benefit Net PV Benefit / $2,563.826.65 PV Refunded Debt Service NatPV9eoeJt /$2290,MORefunded Princupal _ Net PVBenefit /$2,350,000 Refunding PrmmpaL._, Refunding Bond Information ___ 208.16954 208,169 54 (1,589.07) $20658047 8 058% 9.021% Refunding Dated Date ._. _ .__ .. _. _ 9/18/2014 Refunding Delrvery Date _ _ 9/182014 Series 20148 GO Refunding I CR 20058 GO WV Rev Bands 1 711512014 1 9:03 AM EHLERS -1549 - City of Mound, Minnesota $2,350,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B CR 2005B GO Wtr Rev Bonds Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps Current Refunding Escrow Date Rate Receipts Disbursements Cash Balance 09/18/2014 2,306,155.42 2,306,15542 10/01/2014 2,306,155.42 Total $2,306,155.42 $2,306,155.42 Investment Parameters l""SmIent: Model (PV. GIC. or Securities) - Securities - ted Default investment weld target Unrestricted Yield to Receipt 22265636° 1 1515 Yield for Arbinap Purposes stsn.o2014BGOR&.Idu9 I CR2005BG0Wt1Rov Bonds 1 7115/2014 1 9!03AM EHLERS -1550- 1 F1,0' i:3 I. Vel jI. 1 It" .id, 2306,155 42 Cash Deposit..__ 6150.__ 1515 6150 -1515 $2306.15542 Total CostOf lolvestmIcDos - , Tarnet Cost of bnveencents at bond vidd 17 Yield to Receipt 22265636° 1 1515 Yield for Arbinap Purposes stsn.o2014BGOR&.Idu9 I CR2005BG0Wt1Rov Bonds 1 7115/2014 1 9!03AM EHLERS -1550- 1 F1,0' i:3 I. Vel jI. 1 It" .id, City of (bound, MN $3,325,000 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2005B Total Refunded Debt Service Date Principal Coupon _ _ Interest Total P +1 Fiscal Total 02/0112015 150,000 00 4000% 48,466 25 198,466 25 198,466.25 08/01/2015 - - 45,46625 45,46625 - 02/01/2016 155,00000 4000% 45,466 25 200,466 25 245,932.50 08/01/2016 - - 42,366.25 42,366 25 - 02/01/2017 165,00000 4.100'A _ _ 4236625 207,36625 249732.50 0017_ 8/01/2 - 38,983.75 38,98375 - 02/0112018 170,000.00 4100% 38,983,75 208,983,75 247,967.50 08/01/2018 - - 35,498.75 35,498.75 - 02/01/2019 175,000 00 4 100% 35 498,75 210,498 75 245,997.50 08/01/2019 - - 3191125 31,91125 02/01/2020 185,000.00 4250% 31,911 25 216911 , 25 248 822 50 08/01/2020 - - 27,98000 27980.00 - 02/01/'2021 190,00000 4.250% 27,98000 217,98000 245,96000 08/01/2021 - - 23,94250 23,94250 - 02/01/2022 200000.00 4250% 23,942.50 223,94250 _., 247,885 00 08/01/2022 -- - 19,692.50 19,692,50 - 02/01/2023 210,000 00 4.350°/ 19,692 50 229,692 50 249,385.00 08/01/2023 - 15,125.00 15,125 00 - 02/01/2024 220,000 00 4350% 15,125 00 235,125 00 250,250.00 08/01/2024 - __. 10.34000 10,340.00 - 02/01/2025 230,000 00 4400% 10,340.00 240,340.00 250,680 00 08/01/2025 - - 5,280.00 5,28000 - 02/01/2026 240,000 00 4 400% 5,280.00 245,280.00 250,560 00 Total $2.290,000.00 $641,638.75 52,931,638.75 - Yield Statistics Base date for Avg Life . &Avg Coupon Calculation 9/182014 _Average L f Average Coupon e 37 ears Ave __.. _ �— �..�� ��... � 43063294% Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) 6 378 Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date .__.. Refunding Delivery Date__ 20056 GO We Rev Eds CR f I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 7/15/2014 1 9:03 AM EHLERS -1551- 9/18/2014 9/18/2014 $3,325,000 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2005B nPht Service To Maturity And To Call Yield Statistics Base date ror Ava Life Re Ave Coupon_ Calculation 9/18/2014 6378 Years Average Life Average Coupon _ -_ _ _.... _.__..___ r_. - - -- - - -- � _ -- 6378 Years Weighted Averae Maturity (FarBas,$) - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - --- Refunding Bond Information 9/1 M014 Refunding Dated Date _ _ _. - - --- -- -- ""- -- - -- 1- - -- � - - 9/I 8/2014 Refunding Delivery Date - _ _ -... _ _ ._. _._ ­­ rnw „.—Rd, rnf I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 7/1512014 1 9,03 AM EHLERS -1552 - Refunded Refunded Refunded D/S Date Bonds Interest D!S To Call Principal Coupon Interest 09/18/2014 - - - 10/01/2014 2,290,00000 16,155.42 2,306,15542 1500.00 00- 4000% - 48,466.25 198,466.25 02/01/2015 - - 45,46625 45,46625 08/01/2015 - ' - 155,000,00 4000% 45,46625 200.46625 02/11/2016 -- - -- - - -- - - --- _._- --- - _ -- - 42,366.25 _, . 42,366.25 08/01/2016 - 16500000 4.100% 42,366.25 207,36625 02/01/2017 . - - 38,98375 38,983.75 08/01/2017 - ' - 170,00000 4100 °r6 38,98375 208,983.75 02/01/2018 - - - - 35,498.75 35498.75 08/01/2018 _ - - - 175,000.00 4.100% 35,498.75 210,498.75 02/01/2019 - - _ - 31,911.25 31,911.25 08/01/2019 _ " 185,00000 4.250% 31,911.25 216,91 L25 02/01/2020 - - - 27,9800 27,980.00 08/01/2020 - ' 190000.00.... 4250%, 27,980.00 217:98(1.00 02/01/2021 - - - -- -- .._ . 23,942.50 23,942.50 08/01/2021 200,000,00 4.250':6 23,942.50 223,942.50 02/01/2022 - - 19,692.50 19,692.50 08/01/2022 - 210,00000 210,00000 4.350% 19,692.50 229,69250 1 5,125.00 15.125.00 08/01/2023 - _ -... _ '__._ - 220,000.00 4350% _.. 15,125.00 235,125.00 02/01/2024 - - - 10,340,00 10,340.00 08/01/2024 _ 230,00000 4400% 10,340.00 240,34000 02/01/2025 - _ - - 5,280.00 5,280.00 08/01/2025 ' - 2- 4- 0,- 00000 4400 %_ 5.280_ .2 -- ---- .00 02/01/20. 26 - - -- I Total $2,290,000.00 $16,155.42 52,306,155.42 52,290,000.00 - 8641,638.75 $2,931,638.75 Yield Statistics Base date ror Ava Life Re Ave Coupon_ Calculation 9/18/2014 6378 Years Average Life Average Coupon _ -_ _ _.... _.__..___ r_. - - -- - - -- � _ -- 6378 Years Weighted Averae Maturity (FarBas,$) - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - --- Refunding Bond Information 9/1 M014 Refunding Dated Date _ _ _. - - --- -- -- ""- -- - -- 1- - -- � - - 9/I 8/2014 Refunding Delivery Date - _ _ -... _ _ ._. _._ ­­ rnw „.—Rd, rnf I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 7/1512014 1 9,03 AM EHLERS -1552 - 7 -9 -2014 City of Mound Public Gathering Permit Application Re: Fee Appeal We ask that the completed application for 4th Annual Dog Days Westonka, a Westonka Community & Commerce event, be on the 'Regular Agenda' and not the 'Consent Agenda' for the city council meeting on July 22nd. We ask to appeal a partial fee, waiving half of the $300 fee, to $150, as previously discussed. Enclosed is a check for the full amount as requested to appear on the council agenda. This event brings an attendance of approx. 600 pet owners/families to Auditors Road for the time of 9 -2 on August 16th. Many of our attendees enjoy the destination event and spend time /money at other establishments in Mound. The event donates all proceeds back to WeCan pet fund, City Projects like the pet waste station on the Andrew Sisters Trail, and an ongoing dog park project. The event also collects pet food donations each year to donate to the local food shelf, Thank you, Laura Cogswell Event Coordinator 612 - 968 -3130 dogdays @westonkacc.com -1553- August 12, 2013 City Manager's Comments: The determination for setting fees depends upon use, intensity of use, length of use, competition /demand for the space, and demands on city staff, equipment and other support needs. Fees that have been waived in the past are no longer being waived for these reasons: The City is in search of revenues, so waivers are less prevalent or less generous. Fledgling organizations have benefited from fee waivers while gaining their footing. Once stabilized, must pay fees as other established organizations pay fees (i.e., Lions Club, Our Lady of the Lake Church, Masons, Jaycees, etc). 3. The Spirit of the Lakes Festival, being a City sanctioned (which is not the same as city sponsored) festival, has all fees waived. Most other events are subject to fees, full -or partial, depending upon use, intensity of use, length of use, and competition /demand for the space, and demands on city staff, equipment and other support needs. 4. Groups that have had fees waived or reduced in past years have been put on notice that fees will eventually be imposed, the notice intended to reduce the blow. * *See Aug 2013 letter from Hanson to Tyler. Excerpts from City of Mound Fee Schedule -- DANCE HALL: Public dance or live music $300 /yr. $100 /day PUBLIC GATHERING: Parks or commons use fee: $300 — $600 /day Damage Deposit $500 - $1000 /day Permit fee and damage deposit to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements. -1554- T al E a � al N Q � al o E N Q � al o N Q .+ al y N Q v v a N � Y C O w Op aD b0 bd W OD W bd b0 CD OD OO b0 b0 � b0 b0 bD b0 OO Y L L u L L L L L L L y L L u L L L y m N \ (O !p i0 (0 (B m t0 @ N N \ u m t0 (O m m C7 l7 C7 2i C7 C7 C7 U' C7 000 U' 2 C7 C7 U' U V l7 u u C u U= V u u U u u U C U, U U U U U ospa Z :E:E oozan .00 1:5 n ozn a s a a \ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a u � cN L G m v u u - c o � O � a ° o o° ° °0 0 0 °0 °0 °0 °o °0 0° , �^Nm'^m m. m m m m 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 .gym nm °0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Y OI m m N Q1 N O m w v N O 0l T T m U N m 0 Y Y -0 m _O m W O) N .O O O -O m d G C 'in .O V O a N V1 N (A N 0 C N (Y N N N N J N N J m m j v N m > O N N T> > Ql n D O I- F- N �- N 0 3 V i- N U U to N> O (i H m h N a u O Y m v w m Y C C U> E U U CI 3 m m m J K Y 41 = 00 to Z N 0 w Z 2 t H N N a o N ry U` Q .0 U N m L aD O b0 m 0 L Q> o am E Er.ac..��� mss vso°.:ow a o m_mZ cO L L m m '^ d w o N G> F- LL 41 LL N a' H LL O U LL 6i LL d a' a V W N N vNi T O N c m m m WEI y �_ O O N U N u V L y N m U m Q U v U LL m OO Y j v U O m m G Y C a+ v 21 m lC. T Y N m 0 Z w i L N N m 0 m O .0 'O U U J>> �'' LL C U V N~ m Y J U U N 0 O U N j O O C 0` Z E N V>— C 00 C, p U U 61 0 0 3 3 0 2 2 2 2 0 2i 2 tr 3 0 ' u m_ 1555 - 3 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14 -_ RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND WESTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ISD #277 WHEREAS, Westonka Public Schools, ISD #277, has an immediate need for a crossing guard on school days on County Road #110 near Grandview Middle School; and WHEREAS, the City had previously provided these services in a cost sharing arrangement with the ISD #277; and WHEREAS, the City Community Service Officer position has vacated and the City will not continue providing this service in the City; and WHEREAS, the City has a duty to provide for pedestrian safety in the City and a long history of cooperating with ISD #277 for student safety; and WHEREAS, ISD #277 is willing to create, administer, and otherwise provide for a part - time Crossing Guard Position in Grandview Middle School; and WHEREAS, ISD #277 has requested the City to continue to participate in the cost sharing arrangement with the City contributing $5,000 to fund the position, and that this $5,000 payment shall be the extent of the City's participation during the 2014 -2015 school year. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby approves the Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Mound and Westonka Public Schools, ISD #277, as shown in Attachment A and made a part herein. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of July, 2014 Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1558- Mayor Mark Hanus Attachment A Page 1 of 2 This Memorandum of Agreement (hereinafter "Memorandum ") is entered into between Westonka Public Schools, Minnesota Independent School District #277 (hereinafter "ISD #277 "), and the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter "City "). WHEREAS, ISD #277 has an immediate need for a crossing guard on school days on County Road 4110 near Grandview Middle School; and WHEREAS, the City had previously provided these services in a cost sharing arrangement with the ISD #277; and WHEREAS, the City Community Service Officer position has vacated and the City will not continue providing this service in the City; and WHEREAS, the City has a duty to provide for pedestrian safety in the City and a long history of cooperating with ISD #277 for student safety; and WHEREAS, ISD #277 is willing to create, administer, and otherwise provide for a part- time Crossing Guard Position in Grandview Middle School; and WHEREAS, ISD #277 has requested the City to continue to participate in the cost sharing arrangement with the City contributing $5,000 to fund the position, and that this $5,000 payment shall be the extent of the City's participation during the 2014 -2015 school year. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto have entered into this Memorandum of Agreement to serve as the terms and conditions of cost sharing agreement for the Grandview School Crossing Guard for the 2014 — 2015 school year as follow: The above recitals are incorporated into this Memorandum as if restated here; and 2. The City will pay $2,500 to ISD #277 on September 1, 2014 and February 1, 2015; and ISD #277 is solely responsible for all required equipment, personnel, compensation, benefits, pension plans, and withholdings associated with the provision of a crossing guard on school days at County Road 4110 near Grandview Middle School; and 4. To the fullest extent possible, ISD #277 and its employees, agents, successors or assigns agree to protect, defend, save, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees from all claims, suits, or action of any kind arising out of this Memorandum. Nothing in this Memorandum shall constitute a waiver or limitation of any immunity or limitation on liability to which the City is entitled. The parties agree that these indemnification obligations will survive the completion or termination of this Memorandum; and The Memorandum shall terminate on the last student school day for the 2014 -2015 school year at Grandview Middle School or earlier upon the mutual consent of the parties; and -1559- Attachment A Page 2 of 2 6. This Memorandum constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and no other agreement prior to this agreement or contemporaneous herewith shall be effective except as expressly set forth or incorporated herein. Any purported amendment shall not be effective unless it shall be set forth in writing and executed by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Mound and the Independent School District #277 have caused this Memorandum of Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers. CITY OF MOUND ISD #277 Kandis Hanson, City Manager Date Kevin Borg, Superintendent Date -1560- lw � • • MEMORANDUM Date: July 17, 2014 To: Mayor and City Council xr. From: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Subject: City of Mound Official Meeting Records and Minute Taking Minnesota State Statute requires that official records be kept to provide a full and accurate accounting of the City business. Attached is an excerpt from the League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo on Meetings of City Councils with regard to meeting minutes. The City of Mound is currently going above the required contents of the meeting minutes by providing additional details of the discussions on the regular agenda items. To illustrate, this is what appeared in the official meeting minutes of the June 24, 2014 Council meeting: 4K. Approve resolution authorizing the purchase of a sewer vac truck for Public Works Hanus asked about the timing of the purchase as it relates to budget. Pausche stated it was projected on the 2015 capital budget and will be depreciated in the Sewer Fund. Pausche stated the decision of whether or not to finance will be made as part of the 2015 bonding analysis. Gillispie asked about whether the old truck was repairable and Ray Hanson said it was a 1985 model and the estimate to repair was $20,000 - $25,000. John Hubler, 5448 Breezy Road, questioned the estimate as he heard it was closer to $6,000. Ray Hanson said that was just for the pump and that there are a number of other issues. Hubler asked if it would be made available for the general public to bid on it and Ray Hanson said probably not. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Iu I Oki IM Ve , .- . +.1 NEWMAN of Alternatively, less detail of the discussion could have been included, as follows: 4K. Approve resolution authorizing the purchase of a sewer vac truck for Public Works MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -51: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A SEWER VAC TRUCK FOR PUBLIC WORKS. As Staff works to prioritize responsibilities and ensure essential services are provided, the question was raised whether or not we are spending too much time on minutes when that time could be used for other things. More condense minutes also helps the minute taker to avoid adding interpretation or subjectivity to the summary. It should be noted that the audio of every meeting is kept as well and can be combined with the meeting minutes to form a comprehensive accounting of the City business. Staff would appreciate the Council discussing their preferences for the level of detail in the minutes and providing direction to Staff. Currently, Staff is evaluating resource allocation and responsibilities and the feedback given will help to determine the outcome. Please let Catherine know if you have any questions regarding this matter at (952)472 -0633 -1562- RELEVANT LINKS: -1563 - League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/17/2013 Meetings of City Councils Page 24 B. Minutes Minn. Stat. § 15.17. City officers must keep all records necessary to provide a full and accurate knowledge of their official activities. Minn. star. § 412.151, subd. A statutory city clerk must keep a minute book. In the clerk's absence, the 1. Whalen v. Minneapolis council should delegate the duty of taking minutes for that meeting. Special Sch. Dist. No, 1, 309 Generally, the clerk has wide discretion as to how to keep the minutes. A Minn. z197 zas N.w.za Ciao (Minn. 1976). verbatim record of everything that was said is not normally required. Yt g Y q However, in any case where the law or charter requires a verbatim record, See Make Your Meeting Minutes Count, Minnesota using a tape recorder instead of a court reporter to accomplish that objective Cities, Jan. -Feb. 2012. is probably valid. Minutes should be written in language average people can understand. Reference to numbers of ordinances, resolutions, and other matters should include a brief description of their subject matter. A,& Op. 470-e Web, I S. If the council finds a mistake in the minutes of the previous meeting, the 19591. clerk should correct the minutes. If the clerk declines to make the correction, the council can order the change by motion and a vote. The clerk must then make the change and show in the minutes that the change was made by order of the council. Minn. Stat. § 412 22 1, subs. The council must provide books and stationery for keeping minutes. State Mina Star ¢ 15 17, subd. law requires all cities to keep minutes on a physical medium that is of a quality that will ensure permanent records. Minn. Stat. § 412.15 1, subd. Because minutes would likely be considered official papers of the city, they should be signed by the clerk. Although not required by law, in many cities the mayor also signs the minutes after the council approves them. If the minute book includes only a clipping from the published proceedings, the clerk should sign the clipping even though the signatures of the clerk and mayor are already printed on the clipping. Minute books are public records and must be available for public view at any reasonable time. 1. Required contents The following items must be included in the minutes: Minn. slat. § 13D.01, subd. 4. a The members of the public body who are present. Minn. Stat. § 331A.01, subd. 6. Minn. Stat. § 15 17, subd. a The members who make or second motions. I. MGm. Stat. § 412.151, subd. 1. Minn. Star. § ® Roll call vote on motions. 412.191, subd. 3. « Subject matter of proposed resolutions or ordinances. Whether the resolutions or ordinances are defeated or adopted. ® The votes of each member, including the mayor. -1563 - League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/17/2013 Meetings of City Councils Page 24 RELEVANT LINKS: See "Statement of Position Meeting Minutes," Office of the State Auditor. 2. Other items that should be in the minutes The Office of the State Auditor has also recommended that meeting minutes include the following information in addition to the information required by state statute. • Type of meeting (regular, special, emergency, etc.) • Type of group meeting (city council, planning committee, etc.) • Date and place the meeting was held. • Time the meeting was called to order. • Approval of minutes of the previous meeting, with any corrections. • Identity of parties to whom contracts were awarded. • Abstentions from voting due to a conflict and the member's name and reason for abstention. • Reasons the governing body awarded a particular contract to a bidder other than the lowest bidder. • Granting of variances and special use permits. • Approval of hourly rates paid for services provided, mileage rates, meal - reimbursement amounts, and per diem amounts. • Listing of all bills allowed or approved for payment, noting the recipient, purpose, and amount. • List of all transfers of funds. • Appointments of representatives to committees or outside organizations. • Reports of the officers. • Authorizations and directions to invest excess funds, information on investment redemptions and maturities. • Time the meeting concluded. HNK. • •.. It is important to make a good record of council decisions and of the factual information on which councilmembers base their decisions. Minutes are the primary record of the decision - making process and are critical if council actions are challenged. Council actions are generally classified as either legislative or administrative. The establishment of general policies and procedures is legislative action and is subject to limited judicial review. Courts typically will not substitute their judgment for a council's judgment on these topics. -1564 - League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/17/2013 Meetings of City Councils Page 25 City of Mound SMI Engineering Hours YTD as of 06/30/14 Project Hours $ Billed Fund Fund /Funding Source Mound /Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision 9.50 1,184.00 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners Mound /MCES Projects, Review /Coordination 7.00 1,013.50 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners /agencies Mound /Development Reviews 7.00 1,011.00 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners 23.50 3,208.50 Mound /General Engineering 146.00 12,03128 101 General Fund /Taxes Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 29.25 2,985.75 101 Streets (1/4) /Taxes Mound /GIS Updates 16.75 1,550.75 101 Streets /Taxes (1 /4) 192.00 16,569.78 Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall 81.00 9,271.00 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /SW Island Area 12.50 1,241.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland 1.50 162.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements 801.00 77,045.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /Emergency Retaining Wall Replace 47.50 5,507.00 401 Capital Projects fund /Bonding Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall 2,194.00 225,378.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding 3,137.50 318,606.00 Mound /MSA System Update 33.50 4,740.00 402 Municipal State Aid for Streets (MSA Funds) Mound /2013 Crack Seal Coat Project 16.00 2,081.50 427 MSA Funds /General Funds 49.50 6,821.50 Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace 241.50 25,803.50 601 Water Fees Mound /Water System Modeling 34.50 3,947.90 601 Water Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 29.25 2,985.75 601 Water Fees (1/4) Mound /Wellhead Protection Plan 3.50 507.50 601 Water Fees Mound /GIS Updates 16.75 1,550.75 601 Water Fees (1 /4) 325.50 34,795.40 Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction 3.50 343.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction 2.50 245.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2012 Lift Station Reconstruction 1.00 98.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvement 49.00 5,168.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvement 200.00 29,903.30 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2015 Lift Station Improvements 10.00 1,385.50 602 Sewer Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 29.25 2,985.75 602 Sewer Fees (1/4) Mound /GIS Updates 16.75 1550.75 602 Sewer Fees (1/4) Mound /2012 MCES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct 74.50 7,674.00 602 Sewer Fees 386.50 49,353.30 Mound /WCA Administration 1.50 160.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /SWPPP Update 20.50 2,286.50 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 29.25 2,985.75 675 Storm Water Fees (1/4) Mound /GIS Updates 16.75 1,550.75 675 Storm Water Fees (1/4) Mound /Surface Water Management 26.00 3,641.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2013 Storm Drainage Improvements 1.00 145.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements 144.00 14,712.00 675 Storm Water Fees 239.00 25,481.00 06/30/14 YTD Total 4,353.50 454,835.48 -1565- Z 0 O M N— 0 MO N F � 0 M. . O r o; r M M a O 0 w M.10—ON Q to M ... 2 m O O N fO IQ O Q N Q n F r N M [O N v r O M O N N Y'i O r M 0 (O W M O N IN O m INN M N N ^_ M V mm v v C) ON N M O h M O N (O M of !O O (O t0 O Q r O (O O W O t O M N W uJ r O �- O N r Q N M [O O> r MOO M m Q N M Q t0 O N F 10 � m n Mmn MM r OQrF �OMO�D7 (O O>(O t0 N M N a U M` O N N O O M N O r M r W Q� OJ O1 (O (D M (p LO U O O Q y r O M (p Q N W fD m r O O (O o> W M t0 O Q M O M Q F O Q N tD M M N M c0 Q M MNN M Q t9 N O Q7 O t0 N NNQ MNN ��- v v QM n Q M O N 0 0 (O N o7 M (O M r^ N Q N O Q n n O M aJ Q N M � M r n N ONO N Q r M m N M O M f0 M (O (O M Qm n m"rOOi co n ry o Mnmci oMmoim m romm o W O N (O I N � V0 Q (O N M O (p Q Q N Q N N M N N— v Q f7 MO tO Mt'JO N Q nn MNrQ7 O� rtOM�OM nON�M O M n N N O N O N N Q r O Q N W M O] N O r F O O of N v r O n lD n � N O M n W n O N 0 M l0 M OJ n N M O N O N (O M M Q (O (O N M M O M M M W N N M M O M W N (D O Q m M M M N Cl! O Q M O M U a m m o c � O M Y N N z N ('J a o 2<m O m N << O '2 m o�d O � °o C N C y p 02 U �m NEvmdmmmmooE"t W c m m d y E v m m 0i m aEi aEi c c a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 o c — 8 man d a c Q m m nn an nnnv `m m m0 m c�c� »� c3 E QLLLLZ wdLLy wEwOr EEEEEEE¢d'i -- ma`�`0 i C7 Z F Q a Z d' � F P Yp m V mj Z a x w a Q m W LL e e W 2 ULL � 6 W k LL LL• d a w m Z O Q K A > C d U d a W ❑ N F Z Y W N a N O W W m P h m W N m m M t0 N F h N M V N m N V O N P h h m W m N m m m O O lO P N P 01 O F- O m N P O m (O m W O m O N e' IO lO h m P m O O - Ol (p N � " m m P h m N M (O O] h N m N OD (O W P W h O F N m O vI M O m h N N P N O) V ry N N l0 M m m W W N O V � Cl N � N r N h N N h m Or O (p h N W m M N N P V O) N H N O_ O OI N Oi h F m !� O O N m m tl N N N N m N N M h �- O O O h F N N N P th M O m m N m N N m N r r r p) (p W P A N 01 N (O W h^ m O W W P P O) m <O f0 P O N 1 It N N N O+ m N F m m W P F V t+NI m m N r r r m F P O m W W OJ [O V N N N P N N m O e o o e o 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 M a e o o e o Y] O m m m m M N O O m F O N m m m h O V O W m O O NW m � r N O OI h W N P O h f0 m m O F N O m O tp P m f� m P h h 01 m O O m W 0 W W V m 0 0 0 N N (O O V h O m c� o�i "�nov6�o ci oi .-m pair a)M vim FOi r �OF N h N N N d' •- ro � m 0 (0 �- ONi V N N W� N N m � h N m V' N m N O O 10 P fo h P m' m m (O W O O (O P N P F O m N P O ♦O �- (O M W O m O1 O m M O m" m m h m P W e- m N m N F V th r N Oi T � m N m N r O M O h O O O O m O N O O m O O O O P N Q2 lO 'O O O F^ O F N F O (O m O N fp A horn om min �o mNmammmm o m Mm ePmmP ai m (O N O O n f0 N W W ry m m W � m 0 0 (O m m N Cl P N F P N P OI O h m aI m N W O M (O m W P P 01 F O m V M m N C C w m U D 2 U LL ❑ d 6] d- T m N '`C, LL oc S c a w c m Z'L' w o Zw _ 6 m min. 3y O A O N N= N K o o m c y v w= o o E `m v m o p v LL W W m Q d o 0 Zc�aUwii¢�Ui3 c�a wo. in aU t-UU _1567_U �� P F3m��m_ 0 m W LL e r `a W > W w a i 0 O d °a zw v i 0 v O W N m O o °a m � d rm� '- c t UW u ❑= z R >:' w w vu O = 'u g o } Q o a o e o a a o o a o a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o q O O N (O N m V O r (O V N O N N O V N N m O oNMmrmC6oa Koim o m do mrnrMCO N N V N O N N N N d M N N E< N O Oo m m (O O) M M < (O N N M W V a0 m [O �- O (O m 00 m r N m N m m O OI O V O M O) N N r O N N r m W d O t7 (p N m m N M m c r f0 m r N N N lt) V O' d av�vmN vmoCO 0 o�n rommmo. -r n r m m m v M o m m r r N m m m M v m N M ry N M m y (O V m N M m r O r m O y V m N N (O O m Co O O N J (2 d' O2 ems' V N 0 m r o o Cn`mvv ,n K _NCO v vo mma m �_ N (00 vin o m V OO v d V V N V (O d 01 a• r V1 N N v N 0 M �' N w N N N .�- N N c c2 m M o a o e o a a o o a o a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o q O O N (O N m V O r (O V N O N N O V N N m O oNMmrmC6oa Koim o m do mrnrMCO d u 2 O N N N N m O (O N N V 00 m r N m N m m O OI O V O M O) N N r O N N r m W d O c d av�vmN vmoCO 0 o�n rommmo. -r n r m m m v M o m m N m m m M v m N M ry N M m y (O V m N M m r O r m O y V Cmi N f0 J 0 J N N d m r o o Cn`mvv ,n K _NCO v vo mma m �_ N m vin o m V OO v d V V N V (O d 01 a• r V1 N N v N 0 M �' N w N N N .�- N N c 3 0 0 0 o m 0 0 0 0 o w m o o n m o 0 o O v o m N N v o cc 0 0 0 or o_M U) mv� u�mvOOOOO. N M N m M ,0 •' r � m N T O (O m M O O Q N Z M O W W Of a N O U) N N d c m h E 5 d N N p Q 6 N w N a d N y N U W Of I—z Vi CEdN F r J m W w LL N d.2 m LU Q k m U m z =O�1568 == z za a W z 7 O LL In Harbor Wine & Spirits 2014 Date Cust 14 Cust 13 Variance Sales 2014 Sales 2013 Difference +/- Cash January 8,851 8,714 137 192,445.57 184,339.57 8,106.00 -47.59 February 8,587 8,614 -27 190,271.10 200,423.60 - 10,152.50 -25.19 March 9,099 9,237 -138 211,432.20 207,569.80 3,862.40 -6.97 April 9,601 9,100 501 210,788.96 196,147.79 14,641.17 -0.85 May 12,520 10,590 1,930 274,669.39 243,744.83 30,924.56 -3279 June 10,827 - 10,827 257,333.00 - 257,333.00 July 12,196 - 12,196 299,483.48 - 299,483.48 August 12,806 - 12,806 304,315.79 - 304,315.79 September 10,183 - 10,183 213,541.40 - 213,541.40 October 10,339 - 10,339 234,353.00 - 234,353.00 November 10,184 - 10,184 241,629.40 - 241,629.40 December 11,023 - 11,023 291,300.67 - 291,300.67 Totals 48,658 123,813 - 75,155 2,874,182.33 - 1,794,575.11 - 113.39 �Y -1569- Sent via email and USPS June 19, 2014 Dear Government Official: Theresa Sunde Government Relations Manager The purpose of this letter is to inform you that, on or about August 1, 2014, Mediacom will be adjusting our Returned Payment Charge from $25.00 per returned payment to $29.00 per returned payment. This fee will be applied to all customers whose electronic or paper payments are returned to us as unpayable Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 507- 837 -4878 or email me at tsunde @mediacomcc.com. Sincerely, Mediacom Communications Corporation 1504 2nd Street SE, - 1570 -:a, Minnesota 56093 �WNNsT P 'f J E � v �EF �ATIOM O\54 June 26, 2014 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD, SUITE 200 • II MINNESOTA 55364 e TELEPHONE 952/745 -0789 • FAX 952/745 -901 Gregory S. Nybeck, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOh LMCD Mayors LMCD City Administrators LMCD Board Members Greg Nybeck, Executive Director Adopted 2015 LMCD Budget lJ Enclosed is a copy of the 2015 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) Budget, which was recently adopted and certified by the LMCD Board of Directors. Minnesota State Statute 10313.635, Subd. 1 requires the LMCD Board, on or before July 1 of each year, to prepare and submit a detailed budget of the LMCD's needs for the next calendar year to the governing body of each municipality in the LMCD (with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be provided by each municipality). Per enabling legislation, the maximum levy the LMCD could forward to its member cities in 2015 is $437,179. We are pleased to forward an approved 2015 LMCD Budget that is well below the maximum levy at $342,492. This is a 0.6% increase when compared to the $340,616 in the levy for the adopted 2014 LMCD Budget. The LMCD has recognized the economic challenges that the member cities have faced in recent years and this has been taken into consideration since 2009. If your city has any comments about the adopted 2015 LMCD Budget, please let me know. On behalf of the LMCD Board of Directors, I would like to thank all 14 LMCD member cities for your continued participation and support of LMCD related activities. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions. My e -mail address is gn beck e lmcd.org. -1571 - r ^-r Web Gage Address: httpWvv\,r•.vJrncd.org , E -mail P.ddress: Irned @imed.v0 ? To protect and preserve Lake Minnetonka. _c >- =on ca�E,,re v ane •' LLJ ., 1' • co 0 UJ ul Q p !N6 N o o o 0 0 0 0 0 o a e o d O c5 O O M r O to M O o O o N M O 6 c C G �- V 'y' O � Q N o N 6 C Afp 0 O N (hO O M 0 0 tND O N N O m QOi (p °p C r co v o e 0 tM N N Oi O p N J N o O OD OC O t0 V N O O � N C M Op �~j' 00 OI M w W J (n N Q O W O O M (0 Y O aD N b C M Q m m 0 W m N M V W Ly bN Z M to 0 C C6 (6 Vi N J u o o rn rn p o m r w m C N M O V m �' O 0 N m ,y' 6 O c a 7 v Q M o W V o 0 0 ° o a e ° o 0 o c o e 0 4- �p N ro W V m N OJ V m N m a V Z U Z W V M O N M O M z M r M M M V M N V m M w N O O � N O O R IN O v K d d <t N O fir.. O V O pMj t0 M _m (hD O0 0� N m A r`'9 m O V O o� V O roA m C4 C6 Lo r V (D Lo W N pNj Cp C cd N Q. Q I x Q O `s ul p 0 2 Q y O a Q Q a zz IL W W W m W K am < Pn O y O ul0 W z�15 2�0Rz O m M 0 a O O m m Y `m N n O M O QI M O N in Z d a m J E N N a 0 c E m m 0 e 0 m w 0 R N V 3 x d c 16 `o U e m a U z r 0 c U 2 U F Z m � mm� 3 IQ tO LO 1p V N (V a mY U F m Z5 z b G N S� 8 N O A v y p� N C � U n" m � c a c_ � m E mmm 41 d U O 'U U ry � d c 2 � z Q a � C CL r N M CP O (0 o °• o< LL 0 09 W N 000000 N r f V ct U) O N V! T O O O r O O O o d d m d o 0 0 o O m w M tm r m o m O O O O O O O O O NY O U N N N QI p mm N M M 00 V N N b j M N N C1 0000000 O O W O O M 0 0 0 0 00 00 M A O m D O O O O t9 N M O N O O A CO v N ( O O 0 m O 0 C O O (O A O 0 O O C (O N r A O N U U O m O O N N m O I N O N A Q � O V Ui (V N (O N O/ M O N C U -4 r O AD m O d N O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0000 O O T O m M m o m m U J O O 0 0 0 N O A O O O O r N V A � O O O m O O O N O 0 O O M O O O ml AD O M N v O m tF O (7 U) h r N OD d' O UD U) N W O O N M m A N m r .6 N r O^ m M r N N N M N r M N V K N m N W r N (D O m r M O At N 0 0 0 0 (0 M m m N O A M M $ O m M m O O O i m W N O O A O r m 0 r M A O O O M (D O N � mm to O O O (O A r pp A r N �j M N 06 A} O O N N M N AD M C 06 L6 N D7 N r QG V N M O ? m O N N m r M N M At 10 "'R tP r Q J f O 0 0 0 0 0 m O O O O O 0 0 0 0 m O O O r N O N O O 0 0 O O O O O O O d O O O O N r O r 0 0 0 0 O O M AM aD N O O O C'1 (O V O O r A O0 � M 0O Di 0 0 r N r AN w U) N � O (D U) N M N N n ® 0 9 N r O- Mm m M c N N (060j M m r M N '0' 4q N m F l3J O O O OJ O O O r O O m O O O tD N A O A M A v m A M O A (O O d M m N O � V O M O M ro O m h h M A M V 00 O O M 0 N v m W N O N N m N w r 0 6 r M N C 0 r U) C% O K 00 N U) V pj O' a} (+1 G N O r w m O -At V M m P n M W r N N V < N Q r r N Ni N N a) C LU N U ww c W AD d y c w U *6 W ay U < > w Eg LU O y 2 > u o O V5 AV W A- C j AV m �L° 'v .v yu a> i U m'E F -cW W U2 ouQV =' a) 0. 0. m 0i F 4E1QU Ea iri dwO aNi� Z6, S m to rn w Q u a— m O d N U m h � < y w �Q A E-J u c cy� 0B(nZ c E< w E 'a ESQ Q ani o Ww� w hZ a�i w dmm W m cU �0 C (n 7 U J A E J LO "" E J 8 N 2 N J W U J a7 O .G 'C G a d h c o a E d h d y a w H W ~ y N H w v y H J r m y our :s O =2 — m c o o.� ai uviQ �, � c mU E O e� ° O �•E .JnUJO O m s�O� m .fir --���y J �Z f,(n LL Lu �O n.m Q m.A u•a m�rnVF Q mn vo (9 W ma U(q F- .�2�' nr .o uV1 V mn(n r N ( -1573- ° F°- ®°Q ' ro I ik M a r a a C Q O Q LL a a N. 0* m O P N P P P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m o m w O O O PI M-0 O O O O O O O O O O M O O W O O O O O O O (D O (0 N p (p a (O Q d sJ N M O P-7 r-< V N N Nv N M M a P cl y V y P N QA C 'O P L o O. N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f0 O 00 O O O (H N O (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O (O 0 0 0 O O O O (O O t D O O N O ++ (O O N n 0 0 (n O sr OD P N (+)- (N�1 1< ti r r` V La M N U7 Y M O M P O M (+D at M— V O< P O O O O 'a V O M M tO P O M M N V O (9) O< N N 00 1 P NO M M 01 < O a O (D N O N O O h )O (p ( M O) O P W O P r A OG V (+i N C) O) P (, M < H M N 0N0 (� r` M N N IOD V Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 O w O O O O Q O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O tO t0 w (O (O 0 0 N O O (O O O O O O O O O V CO'i UJ H Wf O) O h c 0< p) M O O M M M P (O (n N M O O O O O M PI 0 r (O O N M iO M M O O P <y u O r M c0 n N O O) ro Ma W O) O 0 O< M ' w m N M N M n P m w O to N in V N (`i m < (p et or N N M tND O (O Y> d' M" O r (O.g Qa N d w W_ 2 0 O H N N 72 ui O) � ilf U O U a E a O y E aV i (n Oa U ~ cC9 uT z —L+(u L W U. a E C O cm o U a r y C eFe= p E m . o uE a c O O ' z E E U. F 0 m 0cm E Q a ° 0 o °gam Z oV v w a 9 c a w a a fl G 0 (�- u c m m= Q s Y Q [A u Q tq �" 6 o L° c c 09 ooayC .n 9 Wvw°O OEEO m c0 vo`O ° a a fE —a a o 'c m w a a E t- io 0 o f- •. o y �- : F w •L E c o aOF.'Saa�(n5am �u.c.>m ��axm cQc� 'E 'a ._ O (C� aro acrnr = �_u cEvs U Aay J ma V to U mav8 C8 Q w C? 6Q- ri v o -1574 ® (e P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0000 (0 O w O O O O N O (O 0 0 0 0 0 N O (D 0 0 0 A O O O 0 0 0 O O to m O) p 7 P N N � m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m o m w O O O PI M-0 O O O O O O O O O O M O O W O O O O O O O (D O (0 N p (p a (O Q d sJ N M O P-7 r-< V N N Nv N M M a P cl y V y P N QA C 'O P L o O. N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f0 O 00 O O O (H N O (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O (O 0 0 0 O O O O (O O t D O O N O ++ (O O N n 0 0 (n O sr OD P N (+)- (N�1 1< ti r r` V La M N U7 Y M O M P O M (+D at M— V O< P O O O O 'a V O M M tO P O M M N V O (9) O< N N 00 1 P NO M M 01 < O a O (D N O N O O h )O (p ( M O) O P W O P r A OG V (+i N C) O) P (, M < H M N 0N0 (� r` M N N IOD V Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 O w O O O O Q O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O tO t0 w (O (O 0 0 N O O (O O O O O O O O O V CO'i UJ H Wf O) O h c 0< p) M O O M M M P (O (n N M O O O O O M PI 0 r (O O N M iO M M O O P <y u O r M c0 n N O O) ro Ma W O) O 0 O< M ' w m N M N M n P m w O to N in V N (`i m < (p et or N N M tND O (O Y> d' M" O r (O.g Qa N d w W_ 2 0 O H N N 72 ui O) � ilf U O U a E a O y E aV i (n Oa U ~ cC9 uT z —L+(u L W U. a E C O cm o U a r y C eFe= p E m . o uE a c O O ' z E E U. F 0 m 0cm E Q a ° 0 o °gam Z oV v w a 9 c a w a a fl G 0 (�- u c m m= Q s Y Q [A u Q tq �" 6 o L° c c 09 ooayC .n 9 Wvw°O OEEO m c0 vo`O ° a a fE —a a o 'c m w a a E t- io 0 o f- •. o y �- : F w •L E c o aOF.'Saa�(n5am �u.c.>m ��axm cQc� 'E 'a ._ O (C� aro acrnr = �_u cEvs U Aay J ma V to U mav8 C8 Q w C? 6Q- ri v o -1574 ® (e P d 00 O O � at K a CL T y m v .0 N Q « Q P P T O Q d 0 LL 01 71 p O V go W ul N m eu O O O O o O O O O O T .O Co � N Z O O O O N N O N { g y m O V �O O d N O O O O O + O O � OJ CY N m E Al O d 01 6 NS 2 r a � G 0 N LL W W C d CL w d N 9 CL j c 2 z re E ti X f :N N =W w O Nn Q ND M O O O 1+9 O G QI 1"S 4 O d C E F ;o _u Z It O O� N� O rl n o O Lo N� o O NI N� N O cm 0 61 T C 00 P � N R (a E O d p 10 C � E � � t W W � S® aZ w c to a` W = LL N p, Li CY Qp QNNNNNN -1575— 00 O O � a CL T y r .0 N Q -W °J d o O p O V go W ul N m eu 0 O O O Co � N Q N E Al O d 01 6 NS 2 r a � G 0 N LL W W C d CL w d N 9 CL j c 2 z re E ti X f :N N =W w O Nn Q ND M O O O 1+9 O G QI 1"S 4 O d C E F ;o _u Z It O O� N� O rl n o O Lo N� o O NI N� N O cm 0 61 T C 00 P � N R (a E O d p 10 C � E � � t W W � S® aZ w c to a` W = LL N p, Li CY Qp QNNNNNN -1575— v 0 a N _d _ D; g & in a N R « E _ o w 00 £ 0 `o G O - V p C 'a umi,rn��o° e°�•a ao 000 �o�- 000 « Cd D °o��e�on, °o a°DO v� n oN nm o0O 0 O .PI O a 6 d .c z m u E U N = g C J o %mM C 6. E c e w 0 « wv N °c m O 'E a cc An'°Jn a m LO m voz O N i9 o N s N O9 � A � N .6 v V N d € R d 4 E d v ° E N m c m _ m c E W O m e m Ql w r nw M • e� G h fi N °'wc ,.," 8 c . S aca w o b -tea a o E V pp_ o a5 o p u W N aN o Pb = " vyw a m u�5 w L € W u X "- _ € o Q U D v ro Y c � m e H N T D U @ E V di4 A G Ir Cat 1°a3iEu%iEEm N$ Uby E�uiav u Apo moo° v LS 3a°aN : U: J uCaz� aUU a: -1576- U D c N C 0 s" N 0 v J rn _ a aci a L N N A a u°. s U v A b Q N C $ O J @ > = r @ m pO o J W,S_ V 0 0 3 0 � P E @ « ° �.a 9 «?' a oa e O v« o m c ; a c NON 0 g �` c O O o n a S b N m fE @ C c L N l6 0 LL LL N �NN0 M y N @ N@ V £ C N N C tp to O 19 sd. v °• ooc� u o o E Nms2 Nm N era o d o « E o v c% v o o d ,e. c o o o c 9 E 0 # LL LL a E l � a w � ;e 0 U ' a Z @« n v m L m 9 m ° a a E m c o uj a W Z w 2 H m u o 0 p 0 m 1 o "m Q _5 c m 0 m c7 c c o .� y c c d y+ P v m m v w- - -d (L IX ULL . 6 o w — X' W a E C Qw O -1577- p E aci m y w y E£E' d �` ES@ N H O 4 ma �N�tgi� O O r ANON U E_G..: w� N@ OOm C C C 9 2 o W E� '3 N a M b N Y @ m m N E _� ° m Q N ss. N N o N N 0 L N LD g Q Q O N N E Q ? ° N O N v v. 0v.&'« rnE d a v ={p� @md E a v Door O a a u N L o p c u.E owMmO m O Nwwa �cr2 d L d Jr N °o o g�- v A b Q ^i ry O @ « ° o ° 9 a e O `y c m S b `. R c Y 0 LL V G IL a c y W r b lL @ N @ = LL _ c sd. ° ° .Z tL u ase Z Q N Zmm Nms2 Nm r c °� « r O c% v o o d ,e. c o o o c 9 0 # LL LL a E l � a w � ;e « 3° 0 a Z @« d N W m L 9 g a W Z w 2 H m u d 0 0 p 0 m 1 o _5 c m 0 m c7 c c o .� y c c d J w� - -d (L IX ULL . 6 ldd Q6 w — X' a -1577- 2014 LMCD BOARD OF DIRECTORS (As of May 28, 2014) The LMCD is governed by a Board of Directors comprised of one volunteer member appointed by each of the 14 cities surrounding Lake Minnetonka. Board officers include Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary, and Treasurer. Dan Baasen Chair dbaasen @lmcd.org Appointed By City of Wayzata Andrew McDermott Secretary amcdermott@lmcd.org Appointed By City of Orono Jeff Clapp jclapp @lmcd.org Appointed By City of Tonka Bay Ann Hoelscher aoelscher@lmcd.org Appointed By City of Victoria Dennis Mobs dklohs @lmcd.org Appointed By City of Mtka. Beach Jeff Morris jmorris @lmcd.org Appointed By City of Excelsior Sue Shuff sshuff @lmcd.org Appointed By City of Minnetonka -1579- Jay Green rice Chair jgreen @lmcd.org Appointed By City of Mound Gary Hughes Treasurer ghughes @lmcd.org Appointed By City of Spring Park David Gross dgross @lmcd.org Appointed By City of Deephaven Anne Hunt ahunt @lmcd.org Appointed By City of Minnetrista Fred Meyer fineyer @lmcd.org Appointed By City of Woodland Rob Roy Troy @lmcd.org Appointed By City of Greenwood Deborah Zorn dzom @lmcd.org Appointed By City of Shorewood May 29, 2014 TO: LMCD Member Cities Lake Minnetonka Legislators / LMCD Stakeholders J FROM: Greg Nybeck, Executive Director i rl SUBJECT: Annual LMCD Report The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) is pleased to forward its Annual Report (June, 2013 to May, 2014). The LMCD Board of Directors and staff manage the use of Lake Minnetonka's surface waters (via State of Minnesota enabling legislation) since the LMCD's inception in 1967. Management is performed with the highest regard and to the best of abilities. Management of Lake Minnetonka requires a great deal of cooperation and partnerships with a number of public and private sector organizations. A few of these include: e 14 Lake Minnetonka Member Cities and their respective communities; • Hennepin County Sheriff's Office/Water Patrol; • Hennepin County Environmental Services; • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; • Three Rivers Park District; • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; • Commercial Stakeholders (i.e., marinas, charter boat operators, and dock installers); • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; and • General Public. This Report will provide you further information on the following: e General background of the LMCD; and e An overview of the LMCD's programs and activities. Your feedback on this Annual LMCD Report would be greatly appreciated. Additionally, I welcome any questions you may have. I can be reached at qnvbeck Imcd.ora or at 952- 745 -0789. �1,, Web Page Address: http: / /www., 158 9_, E -mail Address: Imcd@lrncd.crg i 30%1I.,A 0..s ,I Waste To protect and preserV Lake Minnetonka. Table of Contents Section I- General Background • How the LMCD Began • How the LMCD Has Evolved • Contact Information • LMCD Demographics Section 2- Highlights of Programs and Activities • Aquatic Invasive Species • LMCD Code of Ordinances • Financial • Lake Use and Recreation • Public Outreach Page Number 1 2 3 ii, r How the LMCD Began The LMCD was created by State of Minnesota (State) enabling legislation in 1967; Minnesota Statutes 10313.601 through 10313.645. The creation of the LMCD was a result of concerned citizens working for nearly a decade to improve Lake Minnetonka. Those efforts included: • In 1889, a special law of the State provided "...no person shall pollute or defile the waters of Lake Minnetonka.... "; • In 1946, the Greater Tonka Council (composed of representatives of 100 civic organizations) was formed to conserve and improve Lake Minnetonka; • In the early 1950's, the League of Minnetonka Municipalities (a voluntary quasi - governmental organization with representatives appointed by area municipalities) was formed to increase the 1946 efforts through more direct liaison with local government; and • A coordinated and more specialized authority (although still a cooperative local effort) was needed to "Save the Lake." Therefore, the Minnesota legislature passed enabling legislation and the LMCD was organized in October of 1967. The LMCD was charged with the following two general responsibilities: 1) to regulate the use of the Lake and 2) to develop a comprehensive program to eliminate pollution. t ? l ,: r t S, . � Early on, Lake Minnetonka's key issue was red algae blooms caused by untreated regional sanitary sewage. This was resolved in the 1970's when sanitary sewers were installed. ® In the early 1970's, the concept of authorized dock use area rules was created. This established reasonable riparian rights for the placement of dock structures and watercraft in a defined area. e In the early 1970's, the first Quiet Water Areas (QWA) were established on Lake Minnetonka (requiring watercraft to traverse at minimum wake) to address public safety and environmental concerns. gi In 1978, regulations for the storage of boat density were adopted, which included the current 1:50' General Rule. Other regulations have been subsequently adopted. e In 1987, Eurasian Watermilfoil (EWM) was discovered on Lake Minnetonka. In response to this, the LMCD purchased mechanical harvesting equipment and, have since, harvested EWM for public navigational purposes. -1582- Learning from the introduction of EWM, the LMCD has maintained that preventing the introduction of new aquatic invasive species (AIS) made more sense than only managing AIS after they had been introduced. Great efforts have been made on this since the early 2000's. Unfortunately, zebra mussels were discovered in Lake Minnetonka in 2010. The LMCD adopted regulations for the licensing and permitting of a number of activities on Lake Minnetonka. These include: • Multiple Docks (approved, legal storage of five or more restricted watercraft); • District Mooring Areas (sailboat buoy fields); • Watercraft for Hire (Charter Boats), including respective liquor licenses; • Permanent Docks (pile driven structures that remain year round); • Special Events (delegated, by resolution, to the Hennepin County Sheriffs Water Patrol); and • Winter De -icing (to prevent damage to docks [generally permanent] from shifting ice). The LMCD is governed by a Board of Directors comprised of one volunteer member appointed by each of the 14 cities surrounding Lake Minnetonka. Board officers include Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary, and Treasurer. LMCD consists of three full -time and one part-time staff members. This includes the Executive Director, Administrative Technician, Administrative Assistant, and a part-time Administrative Clerk. :::.. a a. r a as t a. Staff Members /E -mail Addresses Greg Nybeck, Executive Director gmvbeck(a,lmcd.orQ Judd Harper, Administrative Technician iharperAa lmcd.org Emily Herman, Administrative Assistant ehennan lmcd.org Tammy Duncan, Administrative Clerk Imcdaa lmcd.org For further information or questions, please contact the LMCD at: 5341 Maywood Road (Suite 200) Mound, MN 55364 (952) 745 -0789 (952) 745 -9085 - Fax www.Imcd.org 1583- LMCD Demographics 1. Lake Minnetonka Communities (14) • Deephaven • Excelsior • Greenwood • Minnetonka • Minnetonka Beach • Minnetrista • Mound • Orono • Shorewood • Spring Park • Tonka Bay • Victoria • Wayzata • Woodland 2010 U.S. Census Population Data 3,642 2,188 688 49,734 539 6,384 9,052 7,437 7,307 1,669 1,475 7,345 3,688 437 2. Total Population: 101,585 (based on 2010 U.S. Census Population Data) 3. Lake Minnetonka Physical Features: • Shoreline- 125 miles • Surface Use Area- 14,043 acres • Number of Bays /Areas: 42 • Mean Water Depth: 30 feet • Maximum Water Depth: 113 feet (Crystal Bay) • Water Depths of Less Than 15 Feet- Approximately 39% of Surface Use Area 4. Public Access Ramps (10) Managed By Location Carsons Bay City of Deephaven City of Deephaven Cooks Bay City of Mound City of Mound Grays Bay City of Minnetonka/MN DNR City of Minnetonka Halsted Bay City of Minnetrista City of Minnetrista Lake Minnetonka Regional Park Three Rivers Park District City of Minnetrista Maxwell Bay MN DNR City of Orono North Arm Hennepin County City of Orono Phelps Bay City of Minnetrista City of Minnetrista Spring Park Bay Hennepin County City of Spring Park Wayzata Bay City of Wayzata City of Wayzata 3 HIGHLIGHTS OF PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) Eurasian Watermilfoil (EWM) Harvesting Program e Mechanical harvesting of EWM was conducted for 26 working days from late June through mid August. The first two weeks of the season were postponed due to minimal growth. ® EWM harvesting priorities were based on the accessibility of the harvesting equipment and impediment to public navigation, with a higher priority given to areas of the Lake that were matted. All areas that were accessible by the harvesting equipment were evaluated using this priority (the vast majority of Lake Minnetonka). e The LMCD's fleet of equipment consisted of three harvesters and a transport barge. ® Approximately $80,000 was spent on this program in 2013. Primary funding sources included the LMCD's AIS Management and Prevention Budget and a Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR) grant. For further details, view the 2013 EWMHarvesting Report on the LMCD's website at www.lmcd.org, under "Pamphlets and Reports." LMCD Mechanical Harvester Watercraft Inspections E Since 2002, the LMCD has coordinated inspection of watercraft /trailers at public accesses on Lake Minnetonka. The 2013 program was a cooperative effort of the LMCD, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR), and Three Rivers Park District (TRPD). The goals of this program were to: • Inspect incoming watercraft/trailers, as well as educate watercraft owners and operators, to assist in preventing the introduction of new AIS into Lake Minnetonka; and • Inspect outgoing watercraft/trailers, as well as educate watercraft owners and operators, to assist in preventing the spread of AIS, in particular zebra mussels, from Lake Minnetonka. The MN DNR established Level I and 2 watercraft inspections throughout the state in 2012. In general both inspectors may: • Inspect watercraft for plants, other AIS, and contained water; • Notify a licensed, AIS trained peace officer of an alleged AIS violation; • Deny a launch or use of Lake Minnetonka (when deemed appropriate); and • Require AIS preventative action for problematic watercraft. -1585- There are two additional authorities provided to Level 2 inspectors. Those inspectors may: • Respectfully complete a visual inspection of the inside of a watercraft; and • Conduct watercraft de- contamination procedures (when deemed appropriate). The following highlights the 2013 Watercraft Inspection Programs for Lake Minnetonka: The MN DNR conducted Level land 2 watercraft inspections on Lake Minnetonka (at no costs to the Lake Minnetonka community). Peak days and times covered by the MN DNR were coordinated to parallel coverage by LMCD inspectors (see below) at the Grays, Maxwell, North Arm, and Spring Park Bay public accesses. ® To compliment MN DNR inspectors, the LMCD contracted with Volt Workforce Solutions (Volt) to conduct Level 1 watercraft inspections at the Carsons, Cooks, Halsted, and Wayzata Bay public accesses. ® Watercraft inspections were conducted from Memorial Day weekend through Labor Day during the following days and times: • Fridays (11 a.m. to 7 p.m.); • Saturdays and Sundays (6 a.m. to 6 p.m.); and o Holidays (6 a.m. to 6 p.m.). ® The TRPD, through its gate attendants, inspected watercraft at the Lake Minnetonka Regional Park from early May through Labor Day. This was offered as an in -kind service estimated at 1,000 hours. Approximately $33,472 was spent on this program. Funding sources included the LMCD, MCWD, and the MN DNR. This does not include the in -kind service from the TRPD. For further details (including statistical findings), MN DNR Inspector at Work, copyright MN DNR view the MN DNR 's 2013 Summary Report of Watercraft Inspection Results at Lake Minnetonka on the LMCD's website at www.lmcd.ore, under, "Pamphlets and Reports." AIS Task Force The LMCD's AIS Task Force was established in 1989 (originally called the EWM Task Force). The primary goal of the Task Force is to provide guidance on a variety of AIS matters (including exploring other AIS management and prevention techniques). The Task Force is comprised of AIS professionals from various agencies, as well as other Lake Minnetonka stakeholders. In 2013, they met monthly. :. A summary of some of the topics discussed (with some remaining on the forefront) include the following: • Investigated the idea of creating a West Metro AIS Coordinating Committee (for the purpose of providing a more consistent message on AIS prevention and management techniques throughout); • Preliminarily reviewed prospective new AIS risks and preparations for the prevention or management of; • Reviewed 2013 watercraft inspection results for Lake Minnetonka and within the watershed (including options for 2014); o Reviewed 2014 AIS educational materials for Lake Minnetonka; • Reviewed and provided input to the MN DNR on a Lake Vegetation Management Plan submitted by the Lake Minnetonka Association for certain bays on Lake Minnetonka; and • AIS training for local law enforcement agencies (required to enforce AIS State laws). LMCD Code of Ordinances Qualified Commercial Marinas In September, the LMCD Board coordinated a workshop with Lake Minnetonka commercial owners at Tonka Bay Marina. At this meeting, the commercial marina owners expressed some concerns about certain aspects of the LMCD Code and requested that the Board consider amendments to it. Feedback from the LMCD Board was for the commercial marinas to firm up their requested changes in writing. At a February 12th Board workshop, the commercial marinas submitted a written proposal requesting three changes to the LMCD Code. These included: 1) allowing commercial sites to construct docks out to 200 feet from the shore, 2) to exempt them from needing to provide public amenities for approved special density licenses, and 3) to expedite the application process for "minor changes" to their facilities, by providing the LMCD Executive Director greater authority to administratively approve the applications (with conditions) rather than the LMCD Board. The LMCD Board discussed the commercial marina owners' proposal at its February 26`h Regular Board Meeting. At this meeting, the Board agreed to support the idea of considering the changes proposed by the commercial marinas. In an effort to provide a streamlined and efficient review process, the Board also agreed to consider the changes for commercial marinas first, with yacht clubs and other commercial docks (i.e., municipal and transient docks) to be considered in the future. ® At its April 23rd Regular Board Meeting, the Board received public input and adopted an ordinance for "Qualified Commercial Marinas." This ordinance was a slightly modified version of the changes proposed by the commercial marinas (as recommended by the 2014 LMCD Executive Committee in conjunction with the commercial marinas). Proactive Residential Code Enforcement Program ® Since 2006, the LMCD has coordinated the Proactive Code Enforcement Program for the purpose of enforcing watercraft storage ordinances at residential sites on Lake Minnetonka. -1587- e The primary enforcement efforts established for the Program are to identify and /or re- inspect sites storing: 1) five or more restricted watercraft that do not have a multiple dock license and 2) those storing three or four larger, restricted watercraft that do not comply with the 1:50' General Rule. The following 2013 enforcement priorities were established: 1) to take the necessary steps to resolve problematic sites from 2006 forward, 2) document new violations, 3) continue with the previously established communication process, and 4) re- inspect and define sites where necessary (working with LMCD prosecuting attorney when warranted). ® The LMCD encourages voluntary compliance for all sites identified as being out of compliance with LMCD's watercraft density ordinances. This process is offered via a two - part, non - sequential written communication process; both of which offer staff's assistance and provide educational material to further assess their storage needs. • If compliance efforts are exhausted, staff documents the watercraft storage three days within a 14 day period, at which time a Complaint is filed with the LMCD prosecuting attorney. • For further details, view the 2013 Proactive Code Enforcement Program Report on the LMCD's website at www.lmcd.ore, under, "Pamphlets and Reports." Hennepin County Sheriffs Office Water Patrol Enforcement of the majority of LMCD regulations relating to surface use activities was done so by the Hennepin County Sheriffs Office Water Patrol (Water Patrol). Representatives from the LMCD and the Water Patrol meet annually to update a Joint and Cooperative Agreement that provides for this. The Water Patrol's 2013 full -time staffing consisted of a Lieutenant, a Sergeant, six Deputies, and support staff. Staffing was supplemented by 28 Special Deputies (volunteers) in 2013, which are required to go through an extensive training program. The LMCD (through Save the Lake) annually recognizes one of the Special Deputies for their dedication to Lake Minnetonka (see page 10 under, "Public Outreach "). The Water Patrol provides enforcement for bodies of water within Hennepin County, with Lake Minnetonka receiving the majority of its patrol time. Approximately 7,465 hours of patrol time were logged on Lake Minnetonka in 2013, up from 4,360 hours in 2012. Hennepin County Sheriff Water Patrol • Educational safety programs are a high priority for the Water Patrol. A Hennepin County Ice Awareness Detail was initiated in 2013 to better educate on the dangers of the poor ice conditions (contributing to the increase in patrol time from 2012). ® A summary of key Lake Minnetonka enforcement statistics (from 2010) areas follows: 140 -I -- - - -- $330,649 --- - - -- -- - - - -- $330,649 2012 $322,208 2013 $330,604 ---- 116 120- -- -- - -- - -- - - 94 100 t-- __..--_�-- .- --'-- ------- - ---- -- 7581 80 - (--- - - - --- --'- '---__._.__- --- ..._- -- --4 '- 60- - - - -- '_--- 45 ----- ------ .-- - --- -- '- 21 14 20 --- --- — '- -8-g-4 -- - -- L0110 1 0 - I Boating j Personal j While Careless Careless loation Drownings Intoxicated Boating Consumptio ". Device ) D I (BWI) Arrests n Arrests Citations Arrests 48 I 1 j 21 73. IB 20111 1 75 ' 8 31 74 2012! -1 -� -� 81 1 6 - 14 - 94 i a 20131 0 —�- 45_ r 4 I - 25 _ Financial r The LMCD's operating budget is comprised of both a General and AIS Management and Prevention Fund. The budget is funded, in most part, by a levy through the 14 Lake Minnetonka member cities. The 2013 and 2014 levies were $330,604 and $340,615, respectively. The levies have remained relatively flat since 2009 (based on the LMCD's recognition of the economic challenges that face the member cities). Budget Year Total Leyy General & AIS 2009 $330,649 2010 $330,649 2011 $330,649 2012 $322,208 2013 $330,604 2014 $340,615 The Save the Lake Fund was established in the 1970's. It is a non - profit initiative of the LMCD to provide supplemental funding from privately raised, tax - deductible contributions. The contributions received fund projects that benefit the environmental and recreational needs of Lake Minnetonka, which are not funded through the LMCD's budget. Some of the projects fully or partially funded by Save the Lake in 2013 and 2014 included: • Expansion and replacement of red and green solar lights (see page 10 for further details); • Establishing a Lake Minnetonka Boater Safety Education Program (see below); • Purchase of "No Anchoring" buoys for Hennepin County Environmental Services for Big Island; and o Purchase of public safety equipment for the Mound Fire Department. Lake Use and Recreation Lake Minnetonka Boater Safety Education Program ® The LMCD Board of Directors supported the Save the Lake Committee's recommendation to establish a Lake Minnetonka Boater Safety Education Program whereby youth (ages 12 to 17) work directly with presenters in obtaining their MN DNR Youth Operator Permit. Participants not only receive their Operator's permit but also knowledge of Minnesota boating laws through practical teaching, key on -board safety best practices, and the understanding and awareness of Lake Minnetonka's unique boating experience. ® Guardians were encouraged to attend to enhance the value of training. e In November, a pilot course was coordinated by the Save the Lake Committee. Training for this course was provided by Committee member Jay Soule (with assistance from committee member Torn Skramstad and Board member Gary Hughes). Eight youth and six guardians attended this course. All youth, plus two adults, took the on -line MN DNR course and received either their MN DNR Youth Operator or Boating Safety Certificate. In April, the first of three 2014 coordinated sessions' were held. Training again was provided by Committee member Jay Soule. Fifteen youth and seven guardians attended this course. All youth, plus four adults, took the on- line MN DNR course and received either their MN DNR Youth Operator or Boating Safety Certificate. ® This project has been a true public- private partnership. Partners have included the LMCD (through Save the Lake), Marine Max, Mound Fire Department, Brian Roath, St. Boni Motor Sports, and the Water Patrol. e Expenses for these two training courses were paid through the Save the Lake Fund. -1590- April, 2014 Cake Minnetonka Boater Safety Education Training Solar Light Proms Since 2002, red and green solar lights have been installed on navigational buoys on Lake Minnetonka to assist in nighttime navigation. ® This program has been highly successful and has expanded over the years; more recently 98 red and green solar lights in 2012 to 102 in 2013. e Save the Lake funds 100% of the program costs (including the expansion and on -going replacement /maintenance costs for both the lights and respective brackets). ® This important safety program has provided for the development of many positive partnerships. For many years now, the Lake Minnetonka Charter Boat Association, who not only contributes to Save the Lake, but also provides volunteers (primarily Al & Alma's and Paradise Charter Cruises) on an annual basis to install and remove the lights from Hennepin County's navigational buoys. Public Outreach Committee member Jay Green (who also serves on the LMCD Board; more recently as Vice Chair); • An update from Save the Lake Committee member Jay Soule on the 2013 Lake Minnetonka Boater Safety Education Pilot Program (as well as plans for 2014); and • An update from the City of Wayzata on their Lake Effect Project. Special Deputy Sgt. Steen Erickson Receives Special Deputy of the Year Award The LMCD annually publishes two newsletters that summarize spring/summer and fall /winter projects and activities. The newsletter is distributed to over 6,000 Lake Minnetonka stakeholders. ® In 2011, the LMCD created a new and improved website. The goal of this project was to improve public awareness while providing a more efficient navigational tool. The LMCD 10 -1591- regularly updates the website so that all can be kept up -to -date on current projects as well as general information. More pertinent information is highlighted under the "Hot Topic' section of the website, found on the front page. ® The LMCD continued partnering with the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission (LMCC) on the taping of Board of Director meetings for public viewing. Cable subscribers in the Mediacom viewing area can view these meetings on their Government Channel 20. Air times are listed on their website at www,lmcc- tv.org. Additionally, you can view the meetings on their website, under "Video on Demand" 11 -1592- PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.mlyofmound.com July 16, 2014 Mr. Dan Tolsma City Administrator City of Spring Park 4349 Warren Avenue Spring Park, MN 55384 RE: Proposed use of Emergency Watermain Interconnect The City of Mound has considered the City of Spring Park request for use of the emergency watermain interconnect for a period of about two years, as you address the TCE levels in your water system. Mound staff met with the City's engineers and determined that although there is capacity to provide water for an emergency, the system does not have sufficient capacity for long term usage. The additional usage could reach an estimated 30% increase in our volume and peak flows might not be able to be met. Our water system is not designed to handle those increases on a long term basis. With this information I must decline your request to assist the City of Spring Park in their need for additional water supply. We value our relationship with Spring Park and wish we could help but unfortunately this situation is not feasible for Mound. Please contact me if you have any questions or desire Rather discussion. Sincerely, / Kndis Hanson City Manager 952- 472 -0609 Cc: Mayor and Council Members -1593- p =iwr d on recyUetl paper 7/22/14 Agenda Item #9 Additional Information City Manager Handout Page 1 of 2 Definitions Related to "Sponsor" vs "Sanction" Per Webster's Dictionary, and applied as understood by City Staff July 22, 2014 A sponsor is defined, for these purposes, as a person or organization that pays for or plans and carries out a project or activity. The Spirit of the Lakes organization is the sponsor of the Spirit of the Lake Festival. In 2012, the Centennial was a city sponsored event in that the city passed a resolution engaging the Spirit of the Lakes to put on the Centennial, on its behalf, sealing the agreement with the $6,500 allocation. The annual budget allocation by the city to the Spirit of the Lakes ($1500) is a `level of sponsorship' among all other supporters of the Spirit of the Lakes Festival. The in -kind labor provided by city staff as a historically implied commitment —so sanctioned by the city. Sanction synonyms are: authorization, clearance, concurrence, consent, greet light, custom. 7/22/14 Agenda Item #9 Additional Information City Manager Handout Page 2 of 2 78 -121 LMCD charge based on slip length Set by LMCD 78 -121 Small watercraft slip fee $100.00 /yr 78 -121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (Villa of Lost Lake Residents) $1,148.00/yr 78 -121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (to Mound residents who are not State Accident Report $1.00 Lost Lake residents) $1,950.00/yr. 78 -121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (to Non -Mound residents or Lost Drivers license check: non - resident $1.00 Lake Residents for second slip) $2,050.00/yr 78 -121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (After August 1n of the year) $1,000 /yr 78 -121 LMCD Charge (based on sf of slip) Set by LMCD 78 -121 Multiple Slip Refundable Key Deposit $50.00 78 -123 Processing fee for full slip refund $50.00 78 -123 Processing fee for voluntary suspension of license $50.00 78 -123 Penalty for boat at slip after Fall deadline $100.00 FIRE SERVICES: Fire report (MFD Report) $10.00 30 -51 Burning Permit $10.00 30 -51 False Alarm (per calendar year) 1" $0.00 2 °d $0.00 3rd $50.00 4th $150.00 5" -10th $250.00 ea. over 10 $500.00 PARKS & RECREATION: Depot rental - residents $125.00 /day Depot rental - non - residents $250.00 /day Damage deposit $350.00 plus $50.00 cash Cancellation fee (depot) $75.00 City Hall /Centennial Building room rentals $75.00 /day PUBLIC GATHERING: 50 -20 Parks or commons use fee: $300.00 - $600.00 /day Damage Deposit $500.00 - $1,000.00 1day Permit fee and damage deposit to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements. TAX FORFEIT AND /OR CITY -OWNED PROPERTY Fee for staff review of request for release of tax forfeit and /or city -owned land $200.00 Escrow Deposit for above $500.00 POLICE SERVICES Administrative: State Accident Report $1.00 Police report: up to 5 single -sided pgs $1.00 Addn'I pages, same report $0.25 ea. Drivers license check: non - resident $1.00 Photographs: cost + reproduction, film $25.00 Audio Cassette $15.00 Video Cassette $25.00 Finger printing: resident: N/C Non- resident: $25.00 7/22/14 Agenda ADDED ITEM 4G CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS, the City of Mound experienced extraordinary rainfall levels for the month of June 2014, and has continued to receive above - average rainfall in the month of July, 2014; and WHEREAS, the extraordinary amount of rain has caused significant damage to the timber retaining wall extending across three properties centered at 3025 Island View Drive in the City of Mound ( "Retaining Wall "); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer determined that the Retaining Wall is bulging and appears to be in imminent state of failure; and WHEREAS, to protect the public, City staff closed Island View Drive adjacent to the Retaining Wall; and WHEREAS, the structural integrity of the Retaining Wall is significantly compromised such that it is hazardous and a danger to the health, safety, and welfare of the public using Island View Drive and to surrounding property owners; and WHEREAS, the structural integrity of the Retaining Wall must be restored immediately. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED pursuant to the powers granted to the City of Mound by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 12.29 and 12.37, and Chapter 26 of the Mound City Code, the City of Mound by and through its Mayor and City Council: 1. Declare the failing Retaining Wall to be a local emergency effective on July 22, 2014 and until the Retaining Wall along Island View Drive is replaced; and 2. Appoint the to be the director of the emergency management organization and authorize that director to take all necessary and expedient measures to immediately restore the Retaining Wall and continue to secure the area adjacent the Retaining Wall. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound this 22nd day of July, 2014. Mark Harms, Mayor Catherine Pausche, City Clerk 447303v2 RJR NIU2204 7/22/14 Agenda ADDED ITEM 4G CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS, the City of Mound experienced extraordinary rainfall levels for the month of June 2014, and has continued to receive above - average rainfall in the month of July, 2014; and WHEREAS, the extraordinary amount of rain has caused significant damage to the timber retaining wall extending across three properties centered at 3025 Island View Drive in the City of Mound ( "Retaining Wall "); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer determined that the Retaining Wall is bulging and appears to be in imminent state of failure; and WHEREAS, to protect the public, City staff closed Island View Drive adjacent to the Retaining Wall; and WHEREAS, the structural integrity of the Retaining Wall is significantly compromised such that it is hazardous and a danger to the health, safety, and welfare of the public using Island View Drive and to surrounding property owners; and WHEREAS, the structural integrity of the Retaining Wall must be restored immediately. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED pursuant to the powers granted to the City of Mound by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 12.29 and 12.37, and Chapter 26 of the Mound City Code, the City of Mound by and through its Mayor and City Council: 1. Declare the failing Retaining Wall to be a local emergency effective on July 22, 2014 and until the Retaining Wall along Island View Drive is replaced; and 2. Appoint the to be the director of the emergency management organization and authorize that director to take all necessary and expedient measures to immediately restore the Retaining Wall and continue to secure the area adjacent the Retaining Wall. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound this 22nd day of July, 2014. Mark Hanus, Mayor Catherine Pausche, City Clerk 447303V2 RJR MU220 -4 7/22/14 Agenda Item #9 Additional Information City Manager Handout Page 1 of 2 Definitions Related to "Sponsor" vs "Sanction" Per Webster's Dictionary, and applied as understood by City Staff July 22, 2014 A sponsor is defined, for these purposes, as a person or organization that pays for or plans and carries out a project or activity. The Spirit of the Lakes organization is the sponsor of the Spirit of the Lake Festival. In 2012, the Centennial was a city sponsored event in that the city passed a resolution engaging the Spirit of the Lakes to put on the Centennial, on its behalf, sealing the agreement with the $6,500 allocation. The annual budget allocation by the city to the Spirit of the Lakes ($1500) is a `level of sponsorship' among all other supporters of the Spirit of the Lakes Festival. The in -kind labor provided by city staff as a historically implied commitment —so sanctioned by the city. Sanction synonyms are: authorization, clearance, concurrence, consent, greet light, custom. 7/22/14 Agenda Item I/9 Additional Information City Manager Handout Page 2 of 2 78 -121 LMCD charge based on slip length Set by LMCD 78 -121 Small watercraft slip fee $100.00 /yr 78 -121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (Villa of Lost Lake Residents) $1,148.00/yr 78 -121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (to Mound residents who are not FIRE SERVICES: Fire report (MFD Report) $10.00 30 -51 Burning Permit $10.00 30 -51 False Alarm (per calendar year) 1st $0.00 .2nd $0.00 3`d $50.00 4th $150.00 5th -10th $250.00 ea. over 10 $500.00 PARKS & RECREATION: Depot rental - residents $125.00 /day Depot rental - non - residents $250.00 /day Damage deposit $350.00 plus $50.00 cash Cancellation fee (depot) $75.00 City Hall /Centennial Building room rentals $75.00 /day PUBLIC GATHERING: 50 -20 Parks or commons use fee: $300.00 - $600.00 /day Damage Deposit $500.00 - $1,000.00 /day Permit fee and damage deposit to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements. TAX FORFEIT AND /OR CITY -OWNED PROPERTY Fee for staff review of request for Lost Lake residents) $1,950.00/yr. 78 -121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (to Non -Mound residents or Lost $500.00 POLICE SERVICES Lake Residents for second slip) $2,050.00 /yr 78 -121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (After August 1st of the year) $1,000 /yr 78 -121 LMCD Charge (based on sf of slip) Set by LMCD 78 -121 Multiple Slip Refundable Key Deposit $50.00 78 -123 Processing fee for full slip refund $50.00 78 -123 Processing fee for voluntary suspension of license $50.00 78 -123 Penalty for boat at slip after Fall deadline $100.00 FIRE SERVICES: Fire report (MFD Report) $10.00 30 -51 Burning Permit $10.00 30 -51 False Alarm (per calendar year) 1st $0.00 .2nd $0.00 3`d $50.00 4th $150.00 5th -10th $250.00 ea. over 10 $500.00 PARKS & RECREATION: Depot rental - residents $125.00 /day Depot rental - non - residents $250.00 /day Damage deposit $350.00 plus $50.00 cash Cancellation fee (depot) $75.00 City Hall /Centennial Building room rentals $75.00 /day PUBLIC GATHERING: 50 -20 Parks or commons use fee: $300.00 - $600.00 /day Damage Deposit $500.00 - $1,000.00 /day Permit fee and damage deposit to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements. TAX FORFEIT AND /OR CITY -OWNED PROPERTY Fee for staff review of request for release of tax forfeit and /or city -owned land $200.00 Escrow Deposit for above $500.00 POLICE SERVICES Administrative: State Accident Report $1.00 Police report: up to 5 single -sided pgs $1.00 Addn'I pages, same report $0.25 ea. Drivers license check: non - resident $1.00 Photographs: cost + reproduction, film $25.00 Audio Cassette $15.00 Video Cassette $25.00 Finger printing: resident: N/C Non - resident: $25,00