Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
2014-04-15 CC Agenda Packetmmunity.
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
AGENDA
Page
1. Call meeting to order
2. Supervisors' Annual Reports to the City Council
A. Liquor Store — Manager John Colotti 1 -17
B. Fire & Rescue /Emergency Response— Fire Chief Greg Pederson 18 -90
C. Orono Police Department— Police Chief Coney Farniok 91 -105
D. Finance & Administration/Docks Administration — Finance 106 -109
Director /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche
E. Community Development /Planning /Zoning /Building Inspections — 110 -112
Community Development Director Sarah Smith
F. Public Works Divisions 113 -124
1. Public Works
a. Public Works Director Carlton Moore - Projects
b. Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson - Operations
2. Parks and Open Spaces
a. Public Works Director Carlton Moore
3. Adjourn
m
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE, CITY OF MOUND, MN.
The City of Mound hereby submits a statement of the financial
affairs of the Municipal Liquor Store for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2013, showing a balance sheet and a statement of
operations as prescribed by the Office of the State Auditor
in accordance with Minnesota Statute 471.6985.
Respectfully submitted,
Catherine Pausche
Finance Director/Clerk/Treasurer
CITY OF MOUND - MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
BALANCE SHEET
(UNAUDITED)
December 31, 2013
ASSETS
Cash and temporary investments
$ 2,000
Inventory, at cost
332,956
Prepaid items
250
Capital assets,
net of accumulated depreciation
1,010,845
TOTAL ASSETS 1,346,051
LIABILITIES
Accounts and salaries payable 89,197
Amounts due to other City funds 552,748
TOTAL LIABILITIES 641,945
NET POSITION (LIABILITIES)
Net investment in capital assets 1,010,845
Unrestricted (306,739)
TOTAL NET POSITION (LIABILITIES) $ 704,106
-2-
SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF MOUND MUNICIPAL LIQUOR OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
OPERATING REVENUES
Sales $ 2,887,226
Cost of goods sold 2,148,246
Gross Profit 738,980
Gross Profit as a Percent of Sales 25.59%
Operating Expenses 535,791
Operating Income 203,189
Nonoperating Revenues 89
INCOME BEFORE TRANSFERS 203,278
Transfers out 63,515
CHANGE IN NET POSITION 139,763
NET POSITION, JANUARY 1 564,343
NET POSITION, DECEMBER 31 $ 704,106
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Transfers from Liquor Store Profits to City Funds:
General Fund
-3-
$ 63,515
Harbor Wine & Spirits
Annual Report
March 2014
Report Prepared by: John Colotti,
Manager
Overview
Harbor Wine & Spirits is a successful wine shop located on the shores of Lake Minnetonka. There is
intense competition in this market with two competitors that we would consider local equivalents in
addition to the two major regional competitors located in Minneapolis. Our success is based on several
factors including product selection, pricing, knowledgeable sales staff, store design, in -store displays,
tastings, in -store promotions, community event leadership and media marketing.
Spring - Customer Appreciation Wine Sale
Annual Sale in February
Held for the past ten years, the Customer Appreciation Wine Sale has helped drive sales at a time of
year that is post - holiday and pre- summer peak sales times. The sale is primarily promoted through the
Laker /Pioneer and Lakeshore Weekly News as well as on bag stuffers that go out the weeks leading up
to the sale.
Setting Harbor Wine & Spirits Customer Appreciation Wine Sale apart from our metro competitors is our
universal 15% off by the bottle and 20% off by the case (including mix & match cases) wine pricing. Most
retailers present a limited listing of wines for their sale; subsequently new customers are routinely
impressed when they discover all their choice wines are on sale at our store.
During the three week long sale we have in -store wine samplings hosted by our wholesaler's wine
representatives. We conduct the tastings on Thursday, Friday and Saturdays during peak customer
traffic time.
Fall Wine Sale
Annual Sale in September /October
This is the largest wine sale of the year, featuring 15% off by the bottle and 20% off by the case
(including mix & match cases) wine. Our customers tell us they mark their calendars for this sale and we
make it easy for them to remember it by advertising in the local newspaper, social media and bag
stuffers.
Repeal of Prohibition Sale
December 5, 2013
Last year the industry was all a buzz over the 79th anniversary of the repeal of prohibition and we
jumped onboard with a retro sales event that was a huge hit with our customers. Our Anheuser -Busch
distributor, Thorpe Distributing, worked with us once again to sell single bottles of Budweiser for 10
cents per bottle to commemorate the price back in 19331
U
This was also a great time for our customers to try something new as we had beer and spirits vendors
offering samples from Noon to 8 p.m. For those who made a purchase that day we had vendor
giveaways such as bottle openers, t- shirts and baseball caps.
While the wine sales are a great time to buy wine, this was an opportunity for our customers to get 20%
off beer & spirits as well as wine. Given the December date of this event we questioned if it would cut
into our holiday revenues, however, it proved to be very profitable with Net Sales for the day being
$19547.32 vs. the 2012 event's Net Sales of $19024.08. That combined with the fact that our overall
December sales for 2013 were up by $21831.93 over 2012. We are looking forward to the 2014 sale
which will mark the 81st anniversary. In fact we already have commitments from the majority of our
vendors to participate in the 2014 event.
We promoted this sale with heavy print advertising in the Laker /Pioneer and Lakeshore Weekly News,
social media and bag stuffers.
Wine & Beer of the Month
Each month we feature a wine & a beer of the month promotion. We negotiate special pricing through
our wine & beer vendors (which allows us to still make a profit even during the spring and fall wine sale
months when customers get a further 15 -20% discount). Vendors produce both point -of -sale
promotional material and a large window sign to heighten customer awareness. They host no less than
two in -store tastings on weekends during their monthly feature. We have found that this promotion
results in profitable "add on" sales.
Senior Citizen Discount
Working in coordination with Jubilee Foods, we offer a 10% senior citizen discount every Tuesday and
Friday which is coincidental with their grocery store's senior discount program. This program creates a
"one- stop- shop" effect.
Harbor Wine & Spirits - Beer Label
Surfside Pale Ale creation with Lucid Brewing of Minnetonka
Keeping with the craft -brew trend that is sweeping the market, in 2013 we were able once again to have
our own beer label created through local brewery Lucid. Part -time Harbor Wine & Spirits employee
Dean Fleming gave the beer a fitting name, "Surfside Pale Ale ". Mayor Mark Hanus presided over the
ceremonial unveiling of the new beer with a festive ribbon cutting event that included an in -store beer
tasting. This year's version was a German — style lager, that was available in both kegs and six pack
bottles.
Our Mound Marketplace neighbor Carbone's Pizzeria, got into the spirit and cross - promoted our beer by
offering it on tap.
This summer we once again featured Surfside Lager at the Spirit of the Lakes Festival. Harbor Wine &
Spirits is the sole retailer of the bottled product, and arrangements are being made to have a "new"
-5-
Surfside Pale Ale created for us each year in time for the Spirit of the Lakes Festival. We are currently
sold out of the 2013 label.
Spirit of the Lake Festival — Beer Garden
The Spirit of the Lakes Festival takes place in July each year and Harbor Wine & Spirits hosts the beer
garden which is open Friday /Saturday /Sunday of the event. We work with the Festival Planning
Committee throughout the year to plan for this major community event. Harbor Wine & Spirits Assistant
Manager Ron Gust manages the beer garden, which is staffed by store employees, members of the
Jaycees, ReMax Realty, and the Masons. This is an opportunity for us to reinforce name recognition and
to support our community.
For the past several years we have worked with Thorpe Distributing, who is our Anheuser -Busch
supplier, to coordinate this event. They have a division devoted to this type of promotional activity and
the largest promotional budget of any of our suppliers. Through them we are able to secure a
refrigerated beer trailer, promotional items such as street banners, wristbands and point -of-
sale /general signage all at no cost to the City. The beer offered at the beer garden is cross - promoted at
the store.
Spirit of the Lake Festival — Wine/Beer/Spirits Tastings
Wine and food pairings are presented as a special event hosted by Harbor Wine & Spirits at the Spirit of
the Lake Festival. There are several classes offered featuring high end wine, beer and spirits. Event goers
pay $30 per person to participate and receive gifts such as wine glasses, t- shirts and other promotional
items. Attendees can place orders for the featured items at the event through Harbor Wine & Spirits at
discounted prices for in -store pick -up.
Westonka Community and Commerce Organization - Membership
Harbor Wine & Spirits is in a unique position, representing both the City of Mound and itself as local
business, as a member of the Westonka Community and Commerce Organization (CCO). Through our
membership in the CCO we are able to network with other business and community leaders and
promote our store and the City of Mound as a premier place to do business.
Newspaper Advertising
Laker/Pioneer News
Lakeshore Weekly News
As the official newspaper for the City of Mound, the Laker /Pioneer News is the primary newspaper for
our sales promotions and other advertising efforts. We supplement this advertising with ads in the
Lakeshore Weekly News in order to reach the entire lake community.
Lake Minnetonka Area Business Flyer
A
The Lake Minnetonka Area Business Flyer is produced monthly and is a newsprint advertising that we
have found to be very effective. We have used this flyer for the past eight years. We have advertised
our upcoming sales, tasting events and promotions. To determine who has been noticing our ads we
have run periodic 10% wine discount coupons and each time, we've received 50+ coupons back.
BoomBoard In -Store Video Advertisements
To increase add on sales, in November 2012 we partnered with LifeMedia to bring in -store advertising to
Harbor Wine & Spirits. This has been the case in 2013 as well. LifeMedia provides a flat screen television
screen and generates the ads that run on the screen. Harbor Wine & Spirits promotions are the primary
ads with other area business ads cycling through. (LifeMedia makes its money on the other ads it sells —
there is no cost to the store.) The customer comments have been positive, with them appreciating the
notice on current promotions, leading to additional sales of featured items.
Social Media - Twitter
Mid -2012 the store launched its Twitter account. We started off with a limited following, and have been
building our base by adverting the account on our cash register receipts. We now have over 100
followersH To create value to being one of our followers we have posted exclusive messages such as a
the arrival of tightly allocated craft brews in addition to our broader advertised wine tastings and in-
store specials.
WineConnect - Website
For the last seven years we've partnered with WineConnect, a wine & spirits specialty website company
to manage our store website. WineConnect has a massive database which contains brand photos and in-
depth descriptions of the beer, wine and spirits we sell.
WineConnect has a direct link into our inventory database so it can update the site with any new items
we bring in and remove any we discontinue. We do not ship our product so the website is targeted to
our local market. Each year we have a handful of customers place phone orders for in -store pick -up
based on the website, but more importantly we have received excellent customer feedback on the
ability to research complex wine choices and review their availability before making an in store
purchase.
-7-
Previous Year Class Chart
Harbor Wine & Spirits
Sorts: Class 4/7/2014 11:58:48 AM
Page 1
Costs Sales
$- 150000 $0 $150000 $300000 $450000 3600000 $750000 $900000
OPEN - LIQUOR -01, 001-
OPEN -BEER - 02, 002 - OPEN -BEER
OPEN- WINE -03, 003 - OPEN -WINE
OPEN- NON/TAX - 04,
OPEN 6.5 % TAX -05, 005 - OPEN -6.5%
BOTTLE /KEG DEPOSIT - 06,
BOTTLE /KEG REFUND - 07,
PROMOTIONAL EVENT - 08,
BAR SUPPLY FOOD NTAX - 13,
BAR SUPPLY 6.5% TAX - 10, 010 -BAR
Continued...
Previous Year Class Chart
Harbor Wine & Spirits
Page 2
Costs Msalesl
$- 150000 $0 $150000 $300000 $950000 $600000 $750000 $900000
CIGARETTES AND CIGAR - 12,
CIGARETTES AND CIGAR - 12,
CIGARETTES AND CIGAR - 12,
CIGARETTES AND CIGAR - 12,
JUICES NON/TAX- 15, 015- JUICES
POP & MIXES 6.5% - 16, 016 -MIXES
POP & MIXES 6.5% -16, 017 -POP
N/A BEER NO TAX - 16, 018 -N /A BEER
WINE -60, 019 -N /A WINE
BEER - 20, 020 -BEER
Continued...
91
Previous Year Class Chart
Harbor Wine & Spirits
Page 3
Costs IlSalesl
$- 150000 $0 $150000 $303000 $550000 $600000 $750000 $900000
BEER -20, 021- IMPBEER
LIQUOR - 30, 030 -VODKA
LIQUOR -30, 031 -GIN
LIQUOR - 30, 032 -RUM
LIQUOR -30, 033 - TEQUILA
LIQUOR -30, 034 - STRAIGHTS
LIQUOR -30, 035 - BLENDS
LIQUOR -30, 036 - CANADIANS
LIQUOR -30, 037 - BRANDY /COGNAC
LIQUOR - 30, 038 -IRISH
Continued...
-10-
Previous Year Class Chart
Harbor Wine & Spirits
Page 4
Costs MISalesl
$- 150000 $0 $150000 $300000 $450000 $6J0000 $750000 $900000
LIQUOR -30, 039 - SCOTCH
LIQUOR -30, 040 - CORDIALS
LIQUOR-30, 041- SCHNAPPS
LIQUOR -30, 042- COCKTAILS
LIQUOR - 30, 043 - FLAVORED BRANDY
LIQUOR - 30, 044 -CREAM LIQUEURS
LIQUOR -30, 045- DECANTERS
WINE - 60, 060 - DOMESTIC MISC
WINE -60, 061 - DOMESTIC CHARDS
WINE -60, 062 - DOMESTIC
Continued...
-11-
Previous Year Class Chart
Harbor Wine & Spirits
Page 5
Costs Sales
$- 150000 $0 $150000 $300000 5450000 $600000 $'150000 $900000
WINE -60, 063- DOMESTICMERLOTS
WINE - 60, 064 - DOMESTIC MISC REDS
WINE - 60, 065- DOMESTIC MISC
WINE - 60, 066 - IMPORTS MISC
WINE -60, 067 - AUSTRALIAN WINE
WINE -60, 068 - FRENCH WINES
WINE -60, 069 - GERMAN WINES
WINE -60, 070- CHILIAN WINES
WINE -60, 071 - ITALIAN WINES
WINE -60, 072- CHAMPAGNES
Continued...
-12-
Previous Year Class Chart
Harbor Wine & Spirits
Page 6
Costs ESales
$- 150000 $0 $150000 $ 300000 $450000 $600000 $750000 $900000
WINE -60, 073 - VERMOUTHS
WINE - 60, 074- SHERRY /PORTS
WINE -60, 075 - DESSERT WINES
WINE -60, 076 SPANISH WINE
BEER -20, 080 -MALT
BAR SUPPLY FOOD NTAX - 13, BAR
BEER - 20, BEER - DISCONTINUED
LIQUOR - 30, LIQUOR - DISCONTINUED
POP & MIXES 6.5 %- 16,
PROMOTIONAL EVENT - 08,
Continued...
-13-
Previous Year Class Chart
Harbor Wine & Spirits
Page 7
Costs IMSalesl
$- 150000 $0 $150000 $300000 $450000 $600000 $750000 $900000
CIGARETTES AND CIGAR - 12,
OPEN - LIQUOR - 01, UNDEFINED - 202
WINE -60, WINE - DISCONTINUED
m
EIM El
O m m 0 0 0 0 0 _z r r � O m m m m m m
O M O 'O9 m m m m m D ° (� ; s m m ,x ,x
M m z z z z z m m O m x
m N m 7J m N m m N v v
m ° m m O D D m T <
e < V
z A DpO D° z m m m
z m m O (n m 0 O n v O Z m -i Z m
Z
D
m m D
N W
w w w
A w 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 (n O O
In W j 0 V
O W (n O cp O O V O N V J A O N V
V N N N
W A (WJ� m OJ N W N V
W W V A W O) A O W O N m A N N V
V N N N In 0 0 [9 O m to O cp O V O (T O A V O
-15-
to
O
i
i
i
f
I
v�
n o <
y 0
i y
f
7
1 ^'
J �
0
7 �
n
3
IN
A
V
N
O
A
N
O
p) A
O O
N �
Previous Year Department Chart
Harbor Wine & Spirits
Sorts: Dept 4/7/2014 12:12:00 PM
Filters: Description is between BAR SUPPLY 6.5% TAX - 10 and WINE - 60 Page 1
111cost ®Sales
$- 200000 $0 $200000 $400000 $600000 9600000 $1000000 $1200000
BAR SUPPLY 6.5% TAX - 10
BAR SUPPLY FOOD NTAX - 13
BEER - 20
i�T7
BOTTLE /KEG DEPOSIT - 06
BOTTLE /KEG REFUND -07
CIGARETTES AND CIGAR - 12
JUICES NON/TAX - 15
LIQUOR - 30
LOTTERY -PAID OUT - 09
Continued...
-16-
Previous Year Department Chart
Harbor Wine & Spirits
Page 2
Costs Sales
$- 200000 $0 $200000 $4000U0 $600000 $600000 $1000000 $1200000
N/A BEER NO TAX - 18
OPEN 6.5% TAX - 05
OPEN -BEER - 02
OPEN- LIQUOR - 01
OPEN- NOWTAX - 04
OPEN -WINE - 03
POP & MIXES 6.5% - 16
PROMOTIONAL EVENT - 08
WINE -60
-17-
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
Main: 952.472.3555
Fax: 952.472.3775
www,moundfire.com
Vision Statement: It's our vision to be known as an innovative and
progressive fire department. We are dedicated to the delivery of effective fire
suppression, rescue services and quality fire safety education to the public.
We strive to offer the best available education and training to our members.
We are committed to providing an environment which fosters teamwork
among members. We desire to have an atmosphere of open communication
which promotes the health and welfare of individual members.
This Annual Report is prepared for the Mayor and Councilors for the City of
Mound, and also the Mayors and Councilors of the four other cities we
serve. This report is also presented to and reviewed with our Mound Fire
Commission members.
M
Section I
Section II
Section III
Overview & Highlights Pages 1 -4
Organization and Staff Information Pages 5 -I1
Department Activities
And Performance Measurement
Section IV Apparatus & Equipment
Section V Facilities
Section VI Finances & Budget
Section VII Strategic Plan Initiatives &
Accomplishments
Section VIII Fire Department Challenges
And General Information
-19-
Pages 12 -22
Pages 23 -26
Pages 28 -37
Pages 38 -54
Pages 55 -71
Mound Fire Department
2013 Annual Report
Overview and Highlights
This overview provides a general, but important summary of the Mound Fire Department
activities, accomplishments, and goals met for the year 2013.
The detail and support documents provided within this 2013 Annual Report provide details and
comprehensive information about the Mound Fire Department and the fire department
operations. Please contact Fire Chief Greg Pederson if you have any questions or comments
about the information, or would like to discuss any of the issues.
General Note: This 2013 Annual Report is dutifully prepared for the Mayor and Councilors for
the City of Mound, but also the Mayors and Councilors of the four other contracting cities we
serve. This report is also presented to and reviewed with our Mound Fire Commission members.
Introduction and Overview
The year 2013 was another very successful year for the Mound Fire Department. This year we
continued to work our strategic plan which focuses on hiring, training, and maintaining our
firefighter staff, conservative budgeting, and vigilant financial management. Year 2013 was a
year of major accomplishments for the fire department (refer to accomplishments section).
Our well trained and active paid -on -call firefighter staff remains our most vital asset. In 2013,
our firefighter staffing level increased from 38 to 40, with the hiring of 6 firefighters, three
people retiring and I other resigning. My staffing plan for 2013 is to increase the number of
firefighters and as of March 6, 2013, we have 40 firefighters on staff.
It is the dedication and commitment of the Mound firefighters that help uphold the service and
quality of the Mound Fire Department. In 2013 our calls for service for Fire and Rescue call
activity increased slightly from the 2012 levels. Our fire department emergency call outs in 2013
were 558 vs. 554 call outs in year 2012.
Our firefighter emergency response hours for the year were about 4% higher than the 2012 levels
with a total firefighter emergency response hours at 11,129 hours. The commitment of time and
effort by firefighters continues to be substantial as shown in the detailed breakdown pages which
show department activity.
Organization, Staff Information, Performance Measurement
The Mound Fire department consists of a very active volunteer paid -on -call firefighter staff. We
currently have a staff of 39 volunteer firefighters, plus one full -time administrative assistant and
a full -time fire chief. The total fire department staff is currently at 41.
The following points about organizational resources are supported by the documentation and
graphs included in the pages that follow (please refer to the charts, lists, and graphs).
-20-
jAadmin\admin & organization \annual repon\2013 annual report infonnation\2013 annual report highlights and summary - finatdoex
• In January, 2013 three veteran firefighters retired, and two of the three retired firefighters
returned to active service in April 2013.
• In March, 2013 six (6) new firefighters were hired on a one year probationary period.
• In September 2013 two firefighters retired, and in October 2013 one firefighter resigned
for health reasons.
• Fire and Rescue calls for service were quite steady and at a typical level in 2013. The
department continues to be very active with a total of 11,129 personnel hours spent at
fires and other emergency calls (refer to the 2013 activity report included).
• We responded to 25 Mutual Aid requests in 2013 vs. 16 in 2012, and we provided 975
mutual aid personnel hours. The requests for mutual aid will continue to increase in the
future due to lack of resources at area fire departments, especially during daytime hours.
• Our fire department response continues to generate an average of about 19 -20 firefighters
per emergency call, which is a high number of responders as compared to many other
volunteer or paid -on -call type fire departments.
• MFD firefighters worked a significant amount of hours on apparatus, equipment, and
station maintenance in 2013 for a total of 1,028 hours.
• In 2013 our staff training hours was high at 2,906 hours. Our fire department staff is well
trained and more diversified than ever. Quality training for staff is a top priority in our
department and is critical to our long term success.
• Our fire department staff including all fire officers and firefighters is skilled as well with
a total of about 400 years of accumulated firefighting experience.
Our firefighters, through hard work and dedication continue to put in many volunteer hours, with
a conservative estimate of all work by firefighters in 2013 at 17,617 hours.
Apparatus and Equipment
In 2013 we continued to work on and implement our Apparatus Replacement and Efficiently
Plan. Capital Expenditure spending on apparatus and equipment was low in 2013 due to budget
and financial limitations. There was one addition to our apparatus fleet in 2013.
In 2013 we purchased a new 2013 Chevy Tahoe SUV to support our Duty Chief and
Duty Officer Program. The total investment in vehicle and all equipment was $ 40,496.
Our 1980 Sutphen 100' Aerial Ladder truck is now over 33 years old, it has become
outdated, requires constant care and maintenance, and needs to be replaced (or possibly
taken out of service) very soon. The ladder truck has had many ongoing operational and
functional failures or problems. The operational failures have often been a safety concern
that has required frequent repair.
NOTE: The cost of replacement for a 100' Aerial Ladder truck depends upon the path we
choose (i.e. buy new truck, buy used truck, or refurbish existing truck). The cost of a new
aerial ladder truck that is similar in size and performance to ours would be approximately
$875,000 - $925,000.
In any case we need a ladder truck for fire response and suppression, high level rescue, in
support if our fire protection contracts, and our ISO Public Protection Classification in all cities.
-21-
jAadmin\admYn & organization annual repon\2013 annual report information \2013 annual report highlights and summary - final.dou
P;
In 2010, the Fire Commission has asked me to make the ladder truck replacement a priority topic
and a standard meeting agenda item. There have been numerous conversations about the ladder
truck replacement throughout 2013, and the ladder truck is listed in the Capital Plan Equipment
Plan for replacement in 2014, or in the future as soon finances allow.
We continue to analyze and consider new concepts to meet our ever changing needs for fire
apparatus and equipment. We believe our fire apparatus replacement program plan considers all
of the practical and available options for prudent and cost effective apparatus replacement
purchases in the future. The Fire Commission meeting discussions often deal with apparatus
needs, replacement plan, financial feasibility, and future purchases.
Facility — Fire Station
The Mound Public Safety Facility remains ideal for our daily administration, staff activities,
apparatus housing, equipment storage, training, and emergency response operations. There are
several facility repair and maintenance items that will need to be addressed in the near fixture.
The repair items that need attention are listed on the Public Safety Facility CIP attached.
Finances and Budget
The Mound Fire Department operating expenses for 2013 were under budget overall. This is a
challenging task considering the fire department budget increased by only 1.76 % in 2013. Please
refer to the budget summary page in this report for the 2013 Budget vs. Expenditures comparison
and financial details.
• The fire account reserve fund balance at the beginning of 2013 was $312,082 with an
estimated ending reserve balance of $330.082 at the end of 2013.
• The fire fund balance only increased by approximately $4,960 in 2013 to a year -end
balance of $317,546 (not the final audited amount).
• The end of year fire fund balance is lower than estimated as a result of the Capital
Purchase of a 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe SUV 4 x 4 Duty of Officer Vehicle. Total
investment expense of $40,496.
• Donations and Grants have become a critical $$ supplement to our budget every year. In
2013, these donations and grants programs added over $12,000 to our revenue.
Challenges for the Future — Remain the Same
We are well aware of the nationwide trends and the struggles that many paid -on -call fire
departments face today and the challenges that are anticipated in the very near future. While the
challenges are many, the primary ones are: recruiting and retaining volunteer firefighters,
maintaining the financial support and budget needed to fund apparatus and equipment purchases,
creatively managing fire and emergency call volumes in consideration of firefighter or staff time
commitment, and sharing services (mutual aid or other) among communities to insure efficient
high quality service.
The West Metro Lake Minnetonka area Fire Chiefs have met and started discussions about the
possibly of forming a West Lake area Fire District. The discussions have focused on solving
staffing concerns, sharing resources such as staff and equipment, and financial planning.
-22-
j Witen\admin & organizetionWantal report12013 annual report information \2013 annual report highlights and summary - final.doex
P.
Strategic Plan, Initiatives, and Accomplishments
Ten years ago in 2004, I began a Strategic Plan Initiative with a focus on four key areas
including: Personnel and /or Staffing, Budget and Financial Management, Apparatus and
Equipment, and Facilities. Implementation of this strategic plan is essential to the success of the
Mound Fire Department in the future.
Many of the important strategic plan initiatives have been completed or are ongoing A summary
of the department accomplishments for the year 2013 is included in this report.
The year 2013 brought some important Administrative and Organization changes to the Mound
Fire Department. The department organization structure, including fire department officer
responsibilities, job tasks, and supporting staff duties changed for the better. A Duty Chief and
Duty Officer Program study was completed, which will further improve our fire department
operations and efficiency. The Duty Officer Program begins in April 2014.
Summary
The year 2013 was another busy and very successful year for the Mound Fire Department. I feel
our department accomplishments in 2013 were notable. As a fire department, our staff believes
we have continued our mission to serve our residents and customers well by providing an
essential public service at a relatively low cost with a very high value. There has been minimal,
or in many cases no budget or cost increases from 2011 to 2013.
Our staff of firefighters and office personnel, apparatus, and equipment continues to be
maintained as our key strong elements. We have very nice functional fire station facility.
I believe our 2014 (and future) priority and focus needs to be on increasing funding of our
Apparatus Replacement and Efficiency Project and plan. The budget constraints over the past 5
years have taken a toll on our apparatus replacement program. It is time to prioritize and allocate
more $$ to support apparatus replacement for the present and in the future.
As we look to the future, we anticipate improving and expanding our department operations
further by partnering with Minnetrista as part of their expanded fire service protection plan. A
larger fire district partnership concept will lead to more efficient use of our fire staff, apparatus,
and equipment. A fire partnership model or fire district will most likely be a financial benefit to
the residents of Mound, Minnetrista, St. Bonifacius, and other West Lake communities, plus
provide an added benefit to all of the fire protection contract cities as well.
On behalf of our fire department staff and myself, I would like to thank our city officials, fire
commission members, and citizens for their continued cooperation and support of the Mound
Fire Department.
Respectfully submitted,
Gregory S. Pederson
Mound Fire Chief
2 April 2014
-23-
j1adminWnnin & organization \annual repon\2013 annual report infonnation\2013 annal report highlights and summary - final.docx
P.
1'
1
•
/
/
1
/
/
I
V
Nrn
V/
L;
1
N
C
to
CL
C.
C
.0
E
v9 ca
d
L C
O
d
W
� � v
CEO
1 1
iA
C
O
r
L
d
CL
A
J
M
C
1=
mom.
tv
co
J
0
-24-
E
C
0 lm (D C9
C
CD
E
tot E.
CL >
0
m
C.tm= m
E
++
NCiiN
Q
,'rod
I.1.. W_y W Y d
E
0LE�,�
N
C
C�� =�0
�,. ®++ E
r-00
CQ%.
O
0 C
O O
w W
N
Q
ffM^ q4)
W Q v/CL
ss0qq
V
0
04)0C4�
� cn L)
d L_
:;
°®
�yLgj
Ve u-W
�y3
a. a.
e e ®
e
e
-24-
P:
E
0 lm (D C9
C
CD
E
tot E.
CL >
0
C.tm= m
Q
,'rod
I.1.. W_y W Y d
E
V od (� C
N
C
C�� =�0
�,. ®++ E
L
E a
Q
ffM^ q4)
W Q v/CL
ss0qq
V
0
® e
P:
•
•
4.0
c
0
E
ca
c
ca
ci(
® a)
L
E
^^W W
LL 4-
co
L
5
W
L
^4^�`
W
.c
U
W
U.
i
L '(A
Q
L
E
-25-
m
F-
E
o�
di
Q c
Co 0
0
P G c
Pt
c
C
C
Y�
p
>a
N C
>
2)
Pt
c
O
c15 G
M
9a L
m 4�)
C L1 U
v� N
O �U
i
O N
' EUo
E
m
Co
a00
�a U
r^ vOJ m
ry ;E
aV W
2O
2`O
FL
U
w.
U f`
mc
cu
W-
AO
E
m U cLo
a. y
cm
29
�Q¢
-26-
0
� U
N
N 0 0 lroD .� O O N
CC `S C C T 0
CD fII Q
Z C J
U
O,(DY
URsU Ncc
]+ >',N 7 0 0
rL O
J 'U LL Ur =.0 0:ro
Z U Y d
cu C
0 M O O.O
LO Q..
tY o r p co Od
m
N.M.G C
O U- d N C m,
O N N 0 C
N V' O N C
�rN �� UQ
W:ro:.a W�U-��.
U,J m
.- m {
' a; 72
O 0. 'p O` U > N
UFU- 1 O
cam 2y U-
r
� ar U
W U J Im
P'
Chief 1
Asst. Chief
Asst. Chief
Captain 11
Captain 12
Lieut. 16
Asst. Chief
Dep. Fire Marshal
Captain 14
Captain 15
Captain 16
Lieut. 12
Lieut. 11
Lieut. 14
Lieut. 15
Updated 2 -11 -2014
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
Years of Service List
1 GREG
2 RICK
3 GREG
4 TIM
5 EDDIE
6 DENNIS
7 BOB
8 JASON
9 JOHN
10 RICH
11 ROGER
12 BRUCE
13 MATT
14 TONY
15 DARREN
16 KEVIN
17 BRIAN
18 STEVEN
19 MIKE
20 JOSH
21 MIKE
22 PAUL
23 MARK
24 DERAK
25 JASON
26 ANDY
27 BEN
28 BEN
29 BRYAN
30 MATT
31 AARON
32 JEFF
33 SHAWN
34 JEFFREY
35 NICK
36 DANNY
37 CHRIS
38 JED
39 AARON
4o DANIEL
NAME
PEDERSON
WILLIAMS
PALM
PALM
VANECEK
WOYTCKE
CRAWFORD
MAAS
LARSON
ROGERS
KRYCK
GUSTAFSON
JAKUBIK
MYERS
POIKONEN
FLAIG
BERENT
HENKELS
MCCARVILLE
CLEMONS
FOLEY
JOLICOEUR
LEE
ANDING
RICE
DRILLING
FOSTER
GOTTSCHALK
GORMAN
MORRIS
CRANDALL
HARRISON
HAYES
BRYCE
FARLEY
GRADY
HEITZ
KOBERNUSZ
MORRISON
PATTERSON
START DATE
EQUIP. #
2/3/1975
18
Over 20 years
418/2013
22
(Return to Svc)
4/1/2013
15
(Return to Svc)
5/1/1989
17
11/4/1991
34
3/2/1992
24
3/21/1994
6
15 - 20 years
5/2/1994
32
3/6/1995
5
10/16/1995
19
12/4/1995
27
2/511996
11
11/17/1997
37
5/4/1998
33
12/19/1998
30
4/19/1999
7
10 - 15 years
4/24/2000
1
9/10/2001
2
1/6/2003
35
5/10/2004
23
5- 10 years
5/10/2004
16
5/10/2004
39
5/10/2004
40
7/26/2004
3
7/26/2004
42
5/20/2006
25
5/20/2006
29
5/20/2006
26
11/5/2007
21
11/5/2007
44
10/5/2009
8
Under 5 years
10/5/2009
10
10/5/2009
38
3/21/2011
46
3/4/2013
52
Probationary
3/4/2013
47
3/4/2013
48
3/4/2013
49
3/4/2013
50
3/4/2013
51
*Years of service is as of.
-27-
Yrs Svc *
38.91
29.91
29.67
24.67
22.16
21.83
19.78
19.67
18.83
18.21
18.08
17.90
16.12
15.66
15.04
14.70
13.69
12.31
10.99
9.64
9.64
9.64
9.64
9.43
9.43
7.62
7.62
7.62
6.16
6.16
4.24
4.24
4.24
2.78
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
0.83
1/1/2014
J: \adminAdmin & OrganizationlActive Information \Seniority List - Current
P1
0
0
N
T
f0
E
m
c
i
a
z
Y
O
O
0
C
N
C
O
U
i
v
N
c
L
C
Z
0
a
E
H
1
m
N
O
N
P9
•
Stt
����
t :. lt�ttt
`+s,6`t�t
t It1
��Vt
�t
iLdt""I'V PWMIIII ,t�G�iftlUktti
y
t`i�tt It
��
1 v;.i it ttii
t }List
i
t
t,;l
.
hti t
tt
all IN
1
,tit
ttLea"
> t tt Lt
pt �
1
�iA
i
t � 1 i
l \
��tix
i�� 11 ���1541KU4t
�tA tt`k tl
t
•
Y
W
��t�tit
k
`
�
55\\
�i�r?aYt
��L� tt�� U
t� t1�R�"ii�t
*ta., ,�`�'x
L, iv'ii t
tit i', u�*
i ilk � li,.�L
•
t('i
LOtt1
di �,, {j {m 1 "tvTtitttNt
t;ku {�
t a�tatl�i t"ttti�h tt ttitt ttt��i
t to t �}` �1 t. t�tit£Llk >�4.
���t
reL
0
0
N
T
f0
E
m
c
i
a
z
Y
O
O
0
C
N
C
O
U
i
v
N
c
L
C
Z
0
a
E
H
1
m
N
O
N
P9
Mound Fire Department
2014 Firefighter Staffing Summary
Name Activity/Description Staffing Level
All Staff
2007 total of all department staff
45
(Includes chief and administrative)
All firefighters
2007 total MFD volunteer staff
44
Jerry Rieke
resigns after 4 years on March 4, 2008
43
Kevin Grady
retired after 20 years on August 11, 2008
42
Paul Henry
retired after 20 years on May 5, 2009
41
Matt Kvam (1.5 years)
purchased a home 5/22 out of service area
40
6.4 miles away and resigned 6/09
Rod Stevens (8.5 years)
purchased a home 7/31 out of area in
39
Norwood Young America and resigned 8/09.
HHired four new probationary firefighters 10/05/09 43
Kevin Sipprell (20 years)
Jim Casey (19 years)
Dan Grady (20 years)
retired after 20 years served on 04/06/10 42
resigned 05/13/10 with health issues related to 41
workers compensation injuries (non -fire dept.)
retired on December 6, 2010
M
Hired three new probationary firefighters 3/21/2011 43
Tony Boldon (4 years) Resigned 9/6/11 (performance reasons) 42
Matt Svihel Resigned 10/1/11 moved out of area 41
Gerald Berthiaume Resigned 6/28/12 (Didn't meet probationary 40
Requirements)
Dan Heiland Resigned 10/09/12 (Didn't meet probationary 39
Requirements)
Matt Hentges Retired after 16 years of service on 12/01/12 38
Jeff Andersen Retired after 32 years of service on 1/7/2013 37
-29-
jAadminWmin & organizationVmman resourceAmfd staffing summary january 2014.doc
I
1`11
Greg Palm Retired after 28 years of service on 1/8/2013 36
Rick Williams Retired after 29 years of service on 1/9/2013 35
Hired six new probationary firefighters 3/4/2013 41
Greg Palm
Rick Williams
Chris Pounder
Paul Babb
Jeremy Spader
Other considerations
Tim Palm (24+ years)
Eddie Vanecek (21+ years)
Dennis Woytcke (21 +years)
Return to Service on 4/1/2013 42
Return to Service on 4/8/2013 43
Retired 9/13/2013 42
Retried 9/14/2013 41
Resigned 10/7/2013 0
Considerations, Options and Action Plan Items
a MFD's consistently high firefighter staffing levels is very important to our fire
service customers and contracts.
® It is much more difficult for firefighters today to maintain the high level of response
percentages, and as expected of firefighters in the past. In this regard, more staff is
better to achieve the same result.
a Each firefighter costs the department budget approximately $5 -6K per year (low)
a Basic training of new recruits and the evaluation of firefighter's capabilities take
about 15 -18 months. Training requires much more time classroom and certification.
-30-
j:ladmin \admin & organization \human resources\mrd staffing summary january 2014.doc
2
Pi
2013 Activity Report
EMERGENCY CALLS
FIRE /RESCUE CALLS 2013 IN OUR PRIMARY SERVICE AREA 533
MUTUAL AID CALLS 2013 OUT OF OUR SERVICE AREA 25
TOTAL OF ALL FIRE /RESCUE CALLS IN 2013 558
INCLUDING MUTUAL AID
•
TEP
FIRE /RESCUE PERSONNEL HOURS 2013 IN OUR PRIMARY 10,154
SERVICE AREA
MUTUAL AID FIRE /RESCUE PERSONNEL HOURS 2013 975
FIRE /RESCUE PERSONNEL HOURS 2013 11,129
INCLUDING MUTUAL AID
• r•
FIRE /RESCUE PERSONNEL HOURS IN 2013
11,129
INCLUDING MUTUAL AID
MAINTENANCE HOURS IN 2013
1,028
TRAINING (IN HOUSE) HOURS IN 2013
2,906
TRAINING (OUTSIDE) HOURS IN 2013
1,081
MEETING HOURS IN 2013
991
PUBLIC RELATIONS / FIRE PREVENTION
482
TOTAL • LUNTEER HOURS FOR 2013
J:ladmin\Reports - Fire Incident & Performance21013 Performance Reports12013 Incident Report
Pt.
O
�C
G
d
V
d
Z
O
2
F-
O +°
CL
W
F O
F- O
V
Q i
Z d
W
U-
M
B
d d
W N
® 0
O
W Q,
LL
® ?a
Z =
0
d
O W
N
Pl.
NN
to
p
O O
r V
N
NOS!
(O
X00
Cc)
N
°
m
O
r
°O
00
U
a
W
N
MOMOM
00
MONOcON
VOO
2
W
O
V
M
ON
sT
0
O
w
w
N
Y
N
0
tm
go
d
m
OU
CD
O
p
)
X
Q
2
T
�
I
N
�
p<nXg
Ww
—
_
Q
Q~
J
Q
W
a
OQ�ZoWQ�
ch w
N
M O
O
CD(D
0 0
0 u
0 0
0 0
M
N
V
O
V
t-
W
F
_
r N
Q
111
IL
G
nM,
M
d'MO0
(0000a
N
O�
o
U
0
0 0
0
O M
co V
M
co
M
N
7
NN��O00
V
0 f�ON
00
MOOM
O
M N
N .-
--'T
A N
N°
O �
�O.
P
N
�—
NON
N'-0O
O
co
O
co
LO
Q
j-
U
V
V' (D
N
N:ON
i
M
r
O
N
d
_
p
NN
(D
�(j00
n
d.O
t
N 0.00
N
M
N
0w
a
N
LL
r
1N
t- CO
N
r- M
O O
N '7
V O
O O
N(°
CO
o
U
C.
N
0)
m
N
0
N
N
U
�_
=
m
J
—
LL
LL y
LL N
LL N
�- N
LL N
_�
((- d
LL
010
F
O
io
LY
K
w
w
w
0�
K
d
Q'
N
F
U
U
w
c
W
U
m
O
i
U
d
U
p
Q
U
0
Q
¢
a
Q
Z
>
Q
J
Q
U
0
O
Z
O
F-
W
W
(�
Z
d
t
>_
w
Z
Oz
a
Z
U7
0-
Un
(D
Z_
0
0
3�
Z
FQ.
Pl.
NN
000
N
<t
(O
Cc)
N
•-
(O
''N
U
a
W
Q
2
W
0
O
w
w
Y
0
tm
go
d
m
OU
CD
p
)
X
Q
2
T
�
I
p<nXg
Ww
—
_
Q
Q~
J
Q
W
a
OQ�ZoWQ�
>1W
�p
W�UM�
�W
O
O
W
F
W
UJ
W
Q
111
Pl.
• • 1! • -
Call Breakdown by City for 2013
Minnetrista
69
42
27
1,681
16.6%
Spring Park
109
46
63
1,937
19.1%
Minnetonka Beach
25
14
11
447
4.4%
Shorewood
3
1
_ _ 2
34
0.3%
Total 533 256 277 10,154 100%
Mutual Aid Breakdown By City For 2013
Cocoran
1
1
38
Loretto
Cocoran
1
1
28
Maple Plain
Excelsior
1
1
39
Excelsior
Green Field
1
1
56
Rockford
Independence
2
2
128
Maple Plain
Maple Plain
3
3
96
Maple Plain
Minnetrista
6
5 1
189
St Boni
New Hope
1
1
30
West Metro
Orono
2
2
74
Long Lake
Orono
1
1
12
Maple Plain
St Boni
2
2
144
St Boni
St Louis Park
1
1
72
St Louis Park
Tonka Bay
2
2
51
Excelsior
Total
GRAND TOTAL
25 24 1 975
558 280
-33-
278
11,129
Ply
•
t
s
LO O u7 O U) O V) O
M M C%t N e- r
MIE
-34-
co
w
h:
0
O
3
a�
0
r
m
0
U
(6
N
m
C
O
N
C
C
cu
N
N
C
C
I.-
Z
M
P]
8 E S 8
R R 9 R 9 R R
w c m # n cli �
moil
as
§
§
t;
\
/
m
0
7cc
/
2
k
}
�
\
]
#
U
r!,
•
s •
•
O LO O U� O to O
Cl) N N
slIBO p1V jenjnW
-36-
N
I
O
N
r
C)
O
N
O
r
O
N
m
O
O
N
W v
N 13
O >
O
N � y
K
d �
O
O
j
Y
V
V
:l
0
3
0
s
m
a
4
Q
m
m
m
O
d
c
a
C
r
0
N_
c
v
m
I
PI
r'
O O O O O O O O
N O 00 co V N
P P ppeegq66
sinoH
-37-
o�
N�
M
O
N
O
N
_O
O
N
V � �
0
d =
7
V
M
7
J
t
J
J
PI:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0
C C Cl) am M N N r O LO
SERoH
wm IMT.2
0
N
N
O
N
O
N
O
O
N
T
J
V
b
7
7
V
7
2
V
)
)
d
M
N
O
C
3
0
a
m
a
D_
Q
R
A
R
O
m
w
0
n
N
m
r
m
3
D
Pk
Q
1
r
ui
W
{L
LL
0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 o O o o O
M M r- W r- CO � W W au W W M W
N Ln � r• O 00 � O) 00 m m O LO O Or
O O M O O O M O O O O r• I` r-
Cn
C
C C
O O
� N
Q
f0
0 N
O .0
Cl) LO O co O) O N r- 00 r r• 0) 00 CD Lp
V It LO to V" It r- LO N (D Ln Ln LO (D a
O N
0) lL
N (n
Y _
C
� O
N N
>
W N
C )
v
O O V O I�I' Cl) O O O Cl) O r- N LO 0
N M V M C}' O M Ln M Ln r- LO N y b
n (D (D in m c v V) V) Ln LO Ln (D LO > n N
C N
_U
E n0 L
(-° E
O N C N
C « t0 p m
E d N m
r > V O 0
C
N r- LO 00 LO O r r• M r (0 V r, r- 4) w w
r (3) O N r Cl) LO LO V V to CD (D r O O c o
O (D r r• r` r r- r• r- n r� ti r- r 'O
y N
�e a iT m
CL
� a �
Q V
Y
2 0 d N L
d V
0 C p N L
O) O r N M V LO CD r O O O r N O._
O O O O O O O r Q) C L € jT
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
r N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z N c z
-39-
PI
f
4:
i 4
O O O O O O O O
to O In O Lo O N
m cli N N �-
sino {
I ,
co
N
N
N
T
0
N
I
110
O V
o Z
N
w
r-
O
Q
Y
tl O
j F
`v
N L
LD
m
C
LL
d
0
LL
g
9
� O
y
V p
6
N
d
D
N
S
'c
E
9
_N
PZ
:
i
i
i`
E'
is
O O O O O O O O O
00 to V N O co (O V N
r T 1 1-7
sinoH
-41-
M
T
O
N
N
T
O
N
T
T
O
N
O
T
O
N
W
O
O
N
U
C
cu
v C
0 CD
� � C
V
O
7
7
V
7
V
r
a
J
9
9
y.
M
O
N
C
l0
U1
C
N
t
m
LL
D
LL
N
i0
O
d
N
O
n
N
d
O
_N
C
E
a
S
nz
� � III " "• I I •
Unit Number
Description
Hennepin
Radio Alias
ID
17
1981 Sutphen Aerial Ladder
Ladder #11
18
1984 Ford Pumper
Engine #14
22
1990 E -One Utility Heavy
Equipment Command Vehicle
Utility #11
24
1996 Freightliner Pumper
Engine #12
26
1999 Ford F 250 Crew
Utility #12
28
200119' Silver Wolf
Boat #11
29
2003 Salisbury Pumper
Engine #11
30
2003 Pace American HazMat
Trailer
Utility #13
33
1986 Chevrolet 1 Ton Grass Rig
Mini Pumper
Grass #11
34
1998 Ford F -Super Duty
Rescue #11
35
2007 Freightliner Tanker /Pumper
Tanker #11
37
2008 Polaris 6x6
Utility #15
38
2009 Zodiac 11'C340-15 HP
Boat #12
39
2010 Chevrolet Tahoe 44
Rescue #12
40
2010 Freightliner Tanker /Pumper
Engine #13
41
2010 Command Resource Trailer
Utility #16
42
2013 Chevrolet Tahoe 4x4
Utility #14
-42-
J: \admin \Operations \Apparatus \Apparatus Information \Trucks \Apparatus List 2013
P2.
Unit Number
Description of Apparatus
Radio Alias ID
Comments
417
1981 Sutphen Aerial Ladder
Ladder #11
Replacement 41 Priority
# 18
1984 Ford Pumper
Engine #14
Sell in fall 2014
# 22
1990 E -One Utility Heavy
Utility 411
Equipment Command Vehicle
# 24
1996 Freightliner Pumper
Engine 412
[Engine #12 - 2nd OR
# 26
1999 Ford F 250 Crew
Utility #12
neralServic
428
2001 19' Silver Wolf
Boat 411
# 29
2003 Salisbury Pumper
Engine #11
ngine #11— 1st (7u
# 30
2003 Pace Am. HazMat Trailer
HazMat #I I
[Alias to HazMat Unit #11
HazMat Trailer
#33
1986 Chevrolet 1 Ton
Grass #11
Grass Rig Mini Pumper
# 34
1998 Ford F -Super Duty
Rescue #11
Primary EMS
Rescue Tr'uc
# 35
2007 Freightliner Tanker Pumper
Tanker 411
ater Tanker— Large Cap.
750 GPM -3000 Gallon Tank
#37
2008 Polaris 6 x 6 SUV
Utility #15
ffRoadYehicl"
#38
2009 Zodiac I V C340 — 15 HP
Boat #12
ew $oat.in 2U09
# 39
2010 Chevy Tahoe SUV 4 x 4
Rescue #12
jChief Command Vehicl''
# 40
2010 Freightliner Tanker Pumper
Engine #13
Primary Mutual
1250 GPM — 2000 Gallon Tank
# 41 2010 Haulmark Command Trailer Utility #16
# 42 2013 Chevy Tahoe SUV 4 x 4 Utility # 14
Update 04022014
Apparatus - Equipment Hennepin Radio Alias
-413-
P2
V C
O N
N
CL
U R
m
d
z
d �
Y
a
>° a
i
A
0
d
z
w
2
W
Q
1%
d
Q
V
C C C
co 0 0 0
T T T
O O O) O)
O O O O
t0 O W OJ
O O O O
N N N N
a
N
N
Q
Q
N
m
0
N
u�l
m
U
C
N
C
LL
N
m
0
m
N
m
6
Q°
d
LL
E
i
0
E
U
P2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
QI
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OO_
°o
°o
°o
m
o
m�"rnf9
r, d
ym
N
vrnoNm
N
T
A
Q
N
N
C
_ Z
O
H
w
W w
g
K W Q
W
d
y
c
.O
G
C r
O
O
O
N
E
N
Lei
O
N
O
A
NI
A
o
0
o
O
O
o
A
u
w
d
00
0
0
0
v
0
V
m
r
V
O
O
C5 OC
w
ds
w
I
A
CL
u
c
CL
m
4e
N
O
{ti
fn0
ONO
N
O
O
N
pl
W
f9
1'i
W
S
C
A
o
o
c
o
o
a
w
A
c
o
p
y
hN
OJ
'.
N
o
H
a
r
m
m
3
w
0
O. N
W
^M
N
d
O
I8. �
oY
E
Y
�
p
m
of
Gov
E
OBI
O
NV
tN0
O
M
U d
N
^M
N
V
G
C
000
a
a
o
d
=
000000
Y C
w
0
0
0
0
C
O. 6 p 'O
V
7
M OI
O
O
CL d o m
m
C
v N
n
M
Q H N C
O.
i7
d
SA
Oq
ii LL u
U
Z
d
W
E
V
a
CL
O
U
O
°'
°u N t07
m
0
Oar
O w
d
d
O.
T+
d_
O
J F O
ro U a
7
9
0
6
6
N
v
'O 'U
A
m
F
z w U
Z
m v
a
m
a
o
E
E
d
v
v
o
ee
°'^'
a
d
E
w
°
L)
o° -44
o
Z
Q
W
t
U
c
!L
utl
2
0
o
N
^
2
a
N
N
Q
Q
N
m
0
N
u�l
m
U
C
N
C
LL
N
m
0
m
N
m
6
Q°
d
LL
E
i
0
E
U
P2
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
Apparatus Costs for 2013 Tahoe ( #42)
Date
Ivenclor
I invoice No.
Description
jAmount
4/26/2013
Polar Chev
DR289681
2013 Chevrolet Tahoe Special Service 4X4 Utility
$29,676.55
5/8/2013
Fire Safety USA
60497
Kussmaul - Super Auto Eject, 15 AMP, Cover Color: Red
$235.00
5/13/2013
HotStick USA
3439
Hotstick No. 9005 -02)
$299.00
5/15/2013
Metro Fire
47269
Charger Cradle Assy: Altair5, Vehicle
$192.37
4/25/2013
Streicher's
11014835
500 Series "linear" Super LED light: No mint, red w /red lens; 500 Series
$554.96
"Linear" Super LED light: No mnt, blue w /blue lens; Flangs: Black trim ring
for mounting 500 series
4/25/2013
Streicher's
11014836
Super LED Lighthead: M2 w /out flange, red lens, red LED's; Flange: M2
$469.92
super LED, black; Grommet flange for mounding 500 series;
Compartment light: white illumination light w /clear lens
4/29/2013
Streicher's
11015625
Leg Kit: Chev Tahoe, Yucon Silverado 2000 +; Top Plate: 29" top plate for
$540.96
MCS console; Console pkg: 17" console box w /faceplates (w /o legs,
plate); Storage pocket for console boxes, pocket 3W x 7L; Cupholder:
double for use w /MCS lowbox.
5/20/2013
Stretcher's
11021537
Supervisors Lightbar: 103 -up torus modules, 07+ Tahoe; Rear Lghtbar:
$3,278.92
Citadel w /leds, brackets, Tahoe; Speaker: 100 Watt, compace, tits 2007+
Tahoe /Sub; Lighhead: Dueal 4 Up led's w /bracket, red /blue; LED hid -A-
Blast: 9 LED's White; LED HideA- Blast: 9 LED's, Red; Sire: Master -Come
w/9 -level light control
6/15/2013
Carquest
6974 - 205425
50 Loom; 50 PVC Split Loom; Butt splice terminals; Slide -on terminals;
$234.67
Fuse holders; Ring terminals; Circuit Breaker; HS terminal; Cable Tie;
Junction Box; Gauge Wire; Auxiliary power outlet; Aux dual power
6/22/2013
Carquest
6974- 205860
Circuit breaker; Closed -end terminal; Multi- Conductor Cable; Bulk Trailer
$176.27
Cable
8/24/2013
Carquest
6974- 210176
50 PVC Split Loom, Fuses, HS Tube /Spool, Heat Shrink Tubing, HS
$64.41
Terminal Gage Spl, HS Term
8/31/2013
Carquest
6974 - 210653
Junction Block, Clear RTV Silicone, Rign Terminal, Spade Terminal, HS
$104.31
Terminal Gage Spl,
8/31/2013
Carquest
6974 - 210659
Multi-Conductor Cbl
$52.37
11/9/2013
Carquest
6974- 215134
Outlet, fuse
$27.05
11/6/2013
Carquest
6974 - 214956
Floor Liners
$201.32
8/3/2013
True Value
107187
#14 D -Ring
$0.52
8/11/2013
True Value
107428
Screws /Nuts /Bolts /Washers
$1.71
8/24/2013
True Value
107850
Screws /Nuts /Bolts /Washers, Cable Tie, 16GA Prim Wire, Battery Clip
$54.74
10/12/2013
True Value
109278
Auto Fuse Holder, 30A& 15A Ferule Fuses, Ring Terminal
$18.75
9/2/2013 Innovative
1386
Custom Organizer for rear storage compartment
$2,600.00
Woodworking
Solutions
10/7/2013
Amazon
Universal Wire VehCIe3 Barrier from Kennel -Aire
$80.36
11/6/2013
Napa
872298
Flex Hose
$13.06
9/18/2013 Traffic
Control
61465
Opticom
$1,618.83
TOTAL $40,496.05
-45-
1: \admin \Operations \Apparatus \Apparatus Information \Trucks \42 -2013 Tahoe Duty Vehicle \# 42 Initial Costs
P26
v c
N N
a d
U a
LJ
6
E
Z m
m �
LL
CL
CD
�° a`
D F-
0 z
LU
LU
a.
A
LL
N
a
o'
M �
o A
N
s
vi m
N LL
>, y
= a
d E
R E
a o
`o
v E
0
o y
N
co 'n
o U
P2,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
W
1A
O
O
O
O
p
N
b
0
0
0
0
0
R
N
n
V
ui
m
N
ao
ri
G
`
Q
N
V!
N
d
O
•°
°
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
O
N
N
O -�
F
g
00 c3
m
IQ
aon
C
N
O
p
O.ei
Z
J
W
U.
d
LU
W
C
d
6
Q
T
a
a
o
O
N
a
d
g
g
°o
g
g
g
°o
o°
•O
'
w r
U)
N
m
d
e NIfA
eO
f9
M
�
d
V
O
O
t
O
g
O
T
09
N
R r
O
(R
n
ji
E o
o3
of
ro
uS
N
R
.% N
fA
to
H!
N
L
°
w
C
C
O
O
O
•V
¢
L
LL
�,
O
C
O
O
O
6
g
O
N
C
In
O
O
O
O
N
C
c
C
V
w
p
goo
0
c
a
o
a
d
c
n .
R
c
0
0
0
O
C
'to
U
w
O
O
N
NI
O.
C
•V
fA
Vf
M
R
0.
°o
g
g
°o
a
m
y
O
9
R
y
L
p
R
V
R
U NI
�
w
U
—
c
7
d
❑
R
LL
d
=
O
Of
LL
00
0
g
O
V
V
A
O
IL
O
n
c
E
°°°
0
'0
°
°
o
W
0
o
0
Iq
0
m
It
W
o 0
o
R
R
V
N
c'
C
E
O
a
IL
LL
d
F°
'o
c
`o
a
R
d
•c
ZO
C_
C
c
2E
0
F
¢
o
CL
v
m
25
(L
a
r
U O0
LU
a
^b
P
w
d'w
¢>
c
c
rn
b
Z
N
O
F'
J
J
O
m
T.
d
d
F-
U
a..
E
N
Z
4
3
.�"
�
"u
.L'
A
CL
A
w
c
w
d
w
o
w
v
O
O
5
m
E
t�
u
R
U.
ro
R
u
y
LL
v
a¢
a
w
0
m
v
w
4-
a
LL
0
O
d
LL
r
<l[
M
7
t0
1�
w
t-
LL
O
a
N
N
..
A
LL
N
a
o'
M �
o A
N
s
vi m
N LL
>, y
= a
d E
R E
a o
`o
v E
0
o y
N
co 'n
o U
P2,
Z
a
U g
V °v, ao 6 tie O O
C O .bx N (6 O C" O O W N O .�b. . a�m M- • N N n N q Qp MM ja[} j
r M M
�` fA V3 ffl di
cli
} �
d
O
C
a m
c+0i o N o �j m coo !��p{. o c a
G1 0 1 O O f- `" O ;27f M iD: w o a 0 w
U o o O o
C Q) •- O ;9: � M O!: � Ln v U m
d
C
? q N LL «
� u
d r d
fA Hi w to to fR ffl fRii W 19 ,1R: N y) N
a`
0
N
} v O (0 Oq i0 .�'.f N t0 a'.
(0 r co Lo h b t0 01 co t0.. w
0 to to
(D m t6
V
LO 6Mi m t �' M �j C
Q n vv 000 M N . - O n'. W d
uj
w
Ix
o r v= W
�o W W 69 tiJ 1A 69 fA 49•: (A w to tq Va � N
p Z
a. t
LLI
W O
o m
w z v
Q
uj
w Q (L
UL W
e
CD o O o 0 o q a Y o o m
O d o 0 0 0 o c C' o q o U v m
0 0 = VO'- o C O N W pOj m
® m U) r N 00 Cl) �lt0yp to {eVp. ~ C
m
Cl) N N Cl) lu r <a. Q' O v E ell
M p . i LL U �
E
N NN' E E f
p (g
N w
N
LL n
06 o W
y
> o
0 m c c �w c c
d C = U c y � N C Q m N m
U w
w N
H U .d
CL (0 z N C Q N O L t o O
O U m UZ of a w rti 0- C) O O 2
-47-
PI
M.
3/6 /2074 rz-
Mound Fire Department
September 17, 2013
FINAL
CategoryMescrimtion
Budget Total 2014
e Operating Expenses
s Pension Contribution — Relief Assn.
e Building Rental, Lease, Debt Service
e Salaries for all Staff (all inclusive)
e Operations and Supplies
e Capital Outlay
Salaries for Staff Information:
2014 Budget $ Amount Percent
$ 1,102,121.00 100%
$ 672,181.00 60.99%
$ 147,000.00 13.34%
$ 282,940.00 25.67%
$ 672,181.00 60.99%
$ 410,176.00 37.22%
$ 191,480.00 17.37%
$ 70,525.00 6.40%
e Firefighter Response hours 12,200 per year @ $8.50 per hour = $ 86,700.00
e Duty Crew or Duty Officer Pay (in lieu of firefighter response pay) _ $17,000.00
e Firefighter in -house Training hours 3000 - 3100 per year @ $4.80 per hour= $14,880.00
e Firefighter Station Maintenance hours 980 per year @ $11 per hour= $10,780.00
e Apparatus Heavy Maintenance hours 240 per year @ $14.00 per hour= $3,360.00
s Fire Officer Pay (refer to separate list for officer pay details)_ $30,350.00
e Firefighter meetings, PR events, other hours 1600 per year @ $0 per hour = $0
M 00
P31
O O O O O O O
O
N
C) -It e4 � O vi
00 � h � O ry
M V- N M �--� M N 00 ® .�. N �a It
69 69 69 69 ron fE3 6f3 b9
Q±
M
N
E � e
O p
O
M
M h 1n M
N
��. N W
M 0 h tr
44 6n �ls 64 69 Wl 69 69 69
y y
ti
O 11
2 (6
rn
DO
Piz
'� V � Rq ❑3
� O
-50-
M
O
t�
,D
w^M
i
O
A
A
O
O
U
F
W
0
7
N
N
N
F
4L
Q
a
w
P3
0
N
®
N
°-�
P4'
O
W
--�
n
O
O
O
rF
O
00
N
O
�o
O
eY
O
V
O
O
h
H�4
69
69
69
69
64
ff3
69
64
d
�
w
N
a
�
O
O O O O O O O
O
N
C) -It e4 � O vi
00 � h � O ry
M V- N M �--� M N 00 ® .�. N �a It
69 69 69 69 ron fE3 6f3 b9
Q±
M
N
E � e
O p
O
M
M h 1n M
N
��. N W
M 0 h tr
44 6n �ls 64 69 Wl 69 69 69
y y
ti
O 11
2 (6
rn
DO
Piz
'� V � Rq ❑3
� O
-50-
M
O
t�
,D
w^M
i
O
A
A
O
O
U
F
W
0
7
N
N
N
F
4L
Q
a
w
P3
0
N
®
N
°-�
P4'
O
W
--�
n
O
O
O
rF
O
00
N
O
�o
O
eY
O
V
O
O
h
H�4
69
69
69
69
64
ff3
69
64
d
O O O O O O O
O
N
C) -It e4 � O vi
00 � h � O ry
M V- N M �--� M N 00 ® .�. N �a It
69 69 69 69 ron fE3 6f3 b9
Q±
M
N
E � e
O p
O
M
M h 1n M
N
��. N W
M 0 h tr
44 6n �ls 64 69 Wl 69 69 69
y y
ti
O 11
2 (6
rn
DO
Piz
'� V � Rq ❑3
� O
-50-
M
O
t�
,D
w^M
i
O
A
A
O
O
U
F
W
0
7
N
N
N
F
4L
Q
a
w
P3
P3:
s
y
b
o
w
U
T
U
U
bA
C
cd
to
o
op
cz
E0-
ci.
m
bq
V,
W
c�
�..'
0
d
"O
q
Xo
h
Q
a'�i
cOC
O
C,
qQ�
-cq
u
N
0
w
w
a3i
to
v
w
w
W
W
a°i
Cd
Z
w
Z
V)
eo
x
O
O
00
.a
U
N
N
Qd
R
O
�O
00
®
,�
O
�O
N
t,
N
N
V
N
M
C1
M
bAD
69
69
69
69
GO)
6R
64
fA
6R
69
ff3
69
E
.
8
�
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
v1
'n
CD
h
rp�
M
VI
M
M
M
M
M
N
N
69
69
fA
69
69
69
fA
69
69
69
4A
69
In
�o
d'
7
N
O
64
.Ns
N
MO
y0
fIi
O
N
64
U
®
•�
W
U
N
ate+
UU
U
U
a
�
v
�
3
°°
°
a
a
o
..U.
V
b0
w
4a
O
ai
�C
�
�
6a
F
h
,It
v
d
o
0
„
w
#
#
o
u
Q
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
#
#
P3:
Cpl
P3;
N
Q'
O
O
+.'
R' '7
U
O
O
inn
�
�/]
y
NN,
�
�y
1°1
Vl
43
iti
b
1-1
�
y
[i/•jY
� Cd
zw
Cd
U
COO O
O
O
w
C
'b �
O
�
O
°�
� e'!
•�
�
R3
Uv
O
�
Y.
4+
U
U
C
U
to
U
O
o
L
U
ti
ou
�
co
ry�6/d
U
r3
O
0
U
UO
9
C/
TS
U
ob
a
N
a
v
w
o a
ytt
a
CV
®
J
V•4
W
1•[
`
CIO)
!
V
U
COO
O
®
O¢
W
00
r4
N
Y
O
N
M
VA
kA
O
kr
�
O
v�
bA
.^
O
00
00
l0
.H
yO
.�-i
69
00
�w
f!3
Q-I
iy
y
00
69
U
U
++
V
+"
O
N
O
U
w
Q w
O
>
Q
b
cc
A
�
�
C-,
i
U
O
�p+
to
,,,,//
�i
�
f�•a ctf
O
O
#
O
X52
v
v
Cpl
P3;
m
0
N
m
N
h
O
a�
� no
m
P3,
oo
coo
�
U �
CIO
U
&9
U
�
On
W
Fn
O
O
®
cl
M
7
kn
�•
b d
O
N
M
C•
,O
69
E!3
Y
JZ
W
sys
y
y
O R
O
O
C
U
N
A
U
A
as
0 0
ti
m
vi
y
O W
b
h
tm
c •� w
V O
0
°a
U o0
O
.b
U
cd
c'Jd
U
N �
wl
~
O
v
Cl
O
u
OU
z
O
O
O
O
O
v
U
8
on
'L$
h
.-�
t�j
C.
N F -�-�
®
.-r
W a U
b9
69
59
Fig
H 0 .y
U
O •O
C.a
4a
O
N
U
is
N
' N
bA U Gtr
b VS N N
to
•vV.
E
cAC R
C
of)
N FA f-Q
u
vim'
4o
A?
W
0.a
�rj
d 3N
as
'
U
U
U
m
w(yi
y O m Q
.flb
v,a C�
Tqy
S O
to F9
ti
O
DU '> U
O
-El lu A
o
cq
NO O
C14
O
(14
^ccc^v
m
0
N
m
N
h
O
a�
� no
m
P3,
Mound Fire Department
Year
Description of Grant Items
Amount
Source
2003
Life Safety Trailer for Haz Mat - fully
$39,850.00
* UASI /DEM HC Emergency
equipped with decontamination and
Preparedness
detections equipment
2003
800 MHz Radios - mobiles & portables
$30,800.00
Metropolitan Radio Board
2004
Federal funds to investigate for
$24,250.00
U.S. Economic Development
cleanup of the Western Area Fire
Administration
Training Site (WAFTA)
2004
Firefighter Safety - Fill station, Thermal
$23,185.00
FEMA Firefighter Grant
Imaging Camera, Gas Detector
program
2005
Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (air
$15,750.00
UASI /DEM HC Emergency
tanks & masks for firefighters)
Preparedness
2006
Mobile Data Computers (MDC) for
$15,000.00
USAI /Homeland Security
Installation in the fire apparatus - 3
each
2009
Radio Grant for 800 MHz Portable
$13,225.00
Metro Emergency Services
Board - PSIC Grant
2010
Gas Detector Monitors & Calibration
$1,900.00
Centerpoint Energy (50%
System
match required)
2011
Rehab, Decon, and HazMat Equipment
$6,300.00
HCEP /UASI Homeland
for Life Safety Unit, including Gas
Security
Monitors, Cooling Chairs, CO Monitors,
Misting Unit
2012
Motorola Fire Pagers - Centerpoint
$1,000.00 *
Centerpoint Energy
Energy Matching grant to buy 4
Community Partnership
firefighter pagers
2012
Firefighter Training
$6,509.23
Mn Board of Firefighter
Training & Education
2013
Live Burn (Idlewood Rd Training Burn)
$1,500.00
Mn Board of Firefighter
Training & Education
2013
Firefighter Training
$8,400.00
Mn Board of Firefighter
Training & Education
2014
2 Mustang Cold Water Rescue Suits, 1
$4,600.00 *
Lake Minnetonka
floating water pump, 1 radio with
Conservation District
headset
TOTAL 5192,269.23
-54-
J: \admin \Financia I, Budgets, Expenses \fire department grant summary
P3;
Year
Description of Grant Items
Amount
Source
2006
Self Contained Breathing Apparatus
$26,310.00 *
Homeland Security
(for daily use, rescue, and general
Assistance to FF Grant
response)
2007
Self Contained Breathing Apparatus
$9,543.00 *
Homeland Security
and Breathing Air fill Compressor
Assistance to FF Grant
2008/09
Tanker Pumper 2500 gallon Apparatus
$73,601.00 *
Homeland Security with
1,000 GPM pump
Assistance to FF Grant
2008/09
Training funding assistance - Driving
$19,130.00 *
Homeland Security
Fire Officer II, HazMat, Fire Motor
Assistance to FF Grant
Operator
2009
Firefighter Training - various classes
$15,975.00 *
Homeland Security AFG -
FEMA
2009
Aerial Ladder Truck Refurbish or
$225,000.00 *
Homeland Security AFG-
Replace
FEMA
2009
Aerial Ladder Truck Refurbish or
$935,000.00 *
Homeland Security AFG-
Replace
FEMA
2011
Personal Protective Equipment 30 new
$9,750.00 *
Homeland Security AFG-
sets of firefighter boots ($319 /per pair)
FEMA
2011
Bauer High Pressure 13 CFM 6000 PSI
$31,915.00 *
Homeland Security AFG-
Breathing Air Compressor with fill
FEMA
containment system, plus install costs
2013
SCBA Masks
$1,500.00 *
Centerpoint Energy
Community Partnership
Currently Working On
2006/07 Federal Funding to clean up Western $6,000,000.00 * U.S. Economic Development
Area Fire Training Academy site ground Administration
contamination issues
* Note: Indicates some matching funds required
55-
P \admin \Financial, Budgets, Expenses \fire department grant summary
P31
e} C
� O
O y
C
CL w
U ou
a
4
d
E
m T
Z m
d 'O
d
W m
R
CL
0 y
O L
>- d
O
O.
F
z
W
W
O
w
CaC
G
J
h
d
4
U
U
10
IL
rn
a
m
N
N
m
M N
r �
O �
N
. L
N k
a N
J jy
O C
N N
m E
'O O1
O >
� O
0
o E
o -
N N
o �
U
P3;
Mound Fire Department
2013 Accomplishments:
The Mound Fire Relief Association Pension Plan Improvement Plan Project was
completed and implemented effective on January 1, 2013.
Continued to successfully lead an active Fire Commission group by facilitating the
quarterly meetings and by working with our fire service partners. Resulting in open
communications and cooperation on financial and budget challenges, fire contract
concerns, and any potential fire department operational issues.
9 Successfully managed all of the fire department administration and operational
challenges with the help of a full time Administrative Assistant and the on -going
support of approximately 40 Paid -On -Call firefighters.
Restructured our Chief Officer and Chain -of- Command positions with new job
descriptions and duties that all became effective in April 2013.
Created a comprehensive up -to -date department Employee Handbook and Policy
and Procedure Manual, with new procedures and a new improved format.
9 Implemented a new Incident Command training program for ten (10) Fire Officers
throughout 2013. Effectively managed a well trained professional staff of 40 fire
department personnel.
Hired and completed basic firefighter and emergency medical training of six (6) new
probationary firefighters.
Implemented a new Incident Command training program for ten (10) Fire Officers
throughout 2013.
Continued to focus on fire prevention, fire inspections, and fire code enforcement
programs through participation in numerous major projects such as Westonka
Schools remodel, several residential developments, and others.
Prepared and effectively managed the 2013 Fire Department Budget. Managed the
budget within the overall budgeted increase of 1.76 %. The year -end fire fund
balance is in a positive financial position at approximately $317,000.
Implemented cost saving measures while improving department technology by
replacing old Mobile Data Computers (in fire trucks) with newer less expensive
Apple (Pads. The cost savings is approximately $6,600 per year, with improved
functionality and better overall performance.
In 2013, the fire department staff responded to 558 emergency calls of all types
while protecting five (5) communities, with a total of 11,129 responder hours.
A Continued to lead the City of Mound Safety Committee, while facilitating new training
programs and leading the safety committee meetings.
Created and implemented a comprehensive Automatic Aid Program to help support
the fire response and public safety needs of the City of St. Bonifacius which became
effective in 2013.
Studied and Developed a new Job Performance Standard for Firefighting Staff and
established a comprehensive new Performance Measurement program.
-57-
j:\admin \admin & organization annual report\mfd accomplishments 2013.docx
P31
Efforts underway, but not yet completed:
➢ Continue to implement our on -going apparatus replacement program through
insightful planning, cost effective and timely purchases that better meet the needs of
today's fire and rescue services. Lack of funds is now delaying progress on the
apparatus replacement program.
➢ In 2013, we made very significant progress on updating and creating improved fire
department administrative policies, procedures, and standard operating guidelines
that are now organized in a more appropriate, up -to -date format.
➢ The Succession and Staffing Plan for the fire department is incessant, and critical.
Our short term plan and long term goals include: high quality staff training and
personnel development as an uppermost priority and ultimate goal.
➢ In very near future will need to implement a revised staffing model and modify our
resource deployment plan. We will utilize a staffing plan that is more time conscious
and efficient. This plan will include the use of Duty Officers, possibly Duty Crews,
and /or assigned work shifts for firefighters.
➢ Continue to work with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and environmental
contractor AMEC on a resolution of the ground contamination and pollution issues
on WAFTA training site.
➢ Working on and preparing for an Insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection
Classification Audit that will culminate in April 2014.
Goals /steeds of the fire department:
➢ Continue to maintain existing fire service contracts with our fire service customer
cities and possibly expand our fire service protection area in Western Hennepin
County, as feasible and appropriate.
➢ Strongly consider creating a larger comprehensive Fire District, and ultimately
operate fire stations within the West Hennepin County Suburban Area, the City of
Minnetrista. Possibly consolidate resources with other cities and fire departments in
the relatively near future.
➢ Increase our intensity level (even more) as it relates to firefighter staff development
and improvement by continued recruiting, hiring, training, and maintaining our high
quality staff of volunteer firefighters.
➢ Focus our efforts on developing high quality "realistic" staff training programs.... in
lieu of On- the - Job - Training. We cannot rely on OJT today, as structure fires and
major incidents occur less today than they did 25 years ago.
➢ Increased financial support of the Fire Apparatus Replacement Program with
emphasis on capital equipment budgeting, creative financing and sensible
purchases with a goal to improve efficiency, replace critical fire apparatus Le. Ladder
Truck, and reduce our ever increasing truck maintenance costs.
➢ Pursue grant funding to meet financial needs for both staffing and apparatus
replacement programs.
-58-
jAadmm \adman & organization \annual report\mfd accomplishments 2013.docx
P3S
Pension Division Newsletter
November 2013
Inside this issue:
Supplementol Benefit
Reimbursements
'New Audit Threshold
Working Group Update
Donations from a
Special Fund
i
!State Aid and Forfeiture
Deadline
Pension Division Staff
I
i
i
Office of the State Auditor
Pension Division
525 Park Street, Suite 500
Saint Paul, MN 55103
(651) 282 -6110
Fax: (651) 282 -5298
p ension@osa. state. mn us
0
New Supplemental State Aid Program
A new supplemental state aid program was established during the
2013 legislative session to provide additional funding for fire and
police retirement plans.
Effective for the fiscal year that began July 1, 2013, an
appropriation of $15,500,000 annually will be made to the new aid
program. Of this appropriation, about $5.5 million will be allocated
annually for volunteer fire relief associations and for volunteer
firefighters covered by the voluntary Statewide Plan administered
by the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA). The
remaining amount will be allocated to the PERA police and fire fund
and to the state patrol plan administered by the Minnesota State
Retirement System.
The supplemental state aid amount that a relief association receives
will be equal to the proportionate share that each association
currently receives of fire state aid. A list of the 2013 state aid
amounts for each relief association is available on the OSA website
at: http:!/ www.auditar.state.mn.usJdafault aspx��a e= 20110527 003.
The supplemental state aid is paid at the same time as the fire state
aid. A state aid payment is usually made by an electronic funds
transfer from the State to the municipality affiliated with the relief
association. The supplemental state aid and fire state aid are paid
in two separate transfers, with both transfers occurring on the same
date. The municipality must transfer the supplemental state aid to
the treasurer of the relief association within 30 days of receipt for
deposit in the association's Special Fund.
A relief association becomes eligible to receive supplemental state
aid when all reporting requirements are met with the OSA, and the
association has satisfied its reporting requirements with other
government offices.
It is important to note that the supplemental state aid program will
automatically terminate once the funding ratio of the PERA police
and fire fund or the state patrol plan equals or exceeds 90 percent,
whichever occurs last. The termination of the program should be
taken into consideration when considering benefit improvements.
© 2013 Office of the State Auditor An Equal Opportunity Employer
This Newsletter does not contain legal aG15.9 7and its contents are subject to revision.
P41
Pension Division. Newsletter
November 2013
-9-
-60-
Pa
Supplemental Benefit Reimbursements
What's Ahead:
The Minnesota Department of Revenue (DOR) sent a letter to each
relief association regarding changes to the process for
seeking reimbursement of any supplemental benefits paid during
November 30:
2013. The reimbursement form is now available online, and the
Final deadline for
DOR is requiring that relief associations submit the form online.
submitting 2012
Paper reimbursement forms will no longer be accepted.
reporting -year forms to
j avoid forfeiture of fire
I The DOR is also requiring that relief association's provide their
state aid.
Minnesota ID number on the reimbursement form. If you do not
i
know your relief association's ID number, you can obtain it by
i
calling (651) 282 -5225.
December 5:
Another important change is that reimbursement forms will be
"Working Group Meeting
accepted only between November 15 and February 15 (extended to
from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00
February 17 in 2014). If your relief association seeks
p.m. at the office of the
reimbursement of supplemental benefits paid during 2013, the
OSA.
reimbursement form must be submitted to the DOR between
November 15, 2013 and February 17, 2014, to receive
reimbursement in March 2014. If your relief association misses this
December 1S:
filing period, your association cannot submit the reimbursement
Working Group Meeting
I request until the filing period begins again the following
from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00
November 15.
p.m. at the office of the
The reimbursement form, instructions, and a sample form are
OSA. i
I
available on the DOR website at:
http: / /www.revenue.state.mn.us /local sov /prop tax admin/Paees/
sbr.aspx.
January 15:
Certified Listing of
Relief associations are required to pay a supplemental benefit to
Individuals Who Filed a
each member who receives a lump sum distribution. For pensions
Statement of Economic
and disability benefits, the amount of the supplemental benefit is
Interest due to the
equal to 10 percent of the lump sum distribution, up to a maximum
Campaign Finance and
of $1,000. For survivor benefits, the amount of the supplemental
Public Disclosure Board
benefit is equal to 20 percent of the survivor benefit distribution,
up
to a maximum of $2,000.
In both cases, the supplemental benefit should be calculated based
February 17.
on the pension or benefit amount before any deferred interest is
Final deadline for
added. In addition, deferred interest should not accrue on the
submitting 2013
Supplemental Benefit
supplemental benefit. Supplemental benefits are
PP pp payable to
Reimbursement Forms I
members who are fully vested as well as to those who are partially
to the Department of
vested.
Revenue
I
-9-
-60-
Pa
Employee
Handbook
Officers
Firefighters
i
This Handbook is provided to help employees of the Mound Fire Department become
acquainted with department policies, procedures and operating guidelines. Employees are
responsible for understanding and complying with current department policies at all times.
me
Poi
INTRODUCTION. ...........................................................
................................. ..............................7
Visionand Mission ........................................................................................
..............................7
History... ........................................................................................................
..............................7
RiskManagement Philosophy .......................................................................
..............................8
National Incident Management System ........................................................
..............................8
Chainof Command .......................................................................................
..............................8
Lawsand Standards .......................................................................................
..............................9
Scope.............................................................................................................
..............................9
Purpose..........................................................................................................
..............................9
Content..........................................................................................................
..............................9
Provisions Superseded in Certain Cases .......................................................
..............................9
Policies, Procedures and Operating Guidelines ...........................................
.............................10
FiscalYear ....................................................................................................
.............................10
Definitions....................................................................................................
.............................10
MEMBERSHIP AND EMPLOYMENT ..........................................................
.............................13
Equal Employment Opportunity ..................................................................
.............................13
HonoraryMembers .......................................................................................
.............................13
StaffingLimit ...............................................................................................
.............................13
SeniorityList ................................................................................................
.............................13
Hiringand Selection .....................................................................................
.............................13
DataPractices ...............................................................................................
.............................14
ApplicantQualifications ...............................................................................
.............................14
Pre - employment Medical Exams .................................................................
.............................15
SelectionProcess ..........................................................................................
.............................15
21Page
-62-
M
BackgroundChecks ......................................................................................
.............................15
Firefighter Eligibility and Continued Employment ......................................
.............................16
Residency and Availability Requirements ...................................................
.............................16
Training and Certification Requirements .....................................................
.............................16
Health and Physical Ability Requirements ..................................................
.............................17
Medical Exams and Assessments .................................................................
.............................17
PhysicalAgility Test ....................................................................................
.............................18
MaskFit Test ................................................................................................
.............................18
PermanentMedical File ................................................................................
.............................18
Promotions and Job Postings ........................................................................
.............................18
Selection Process for Officers ......................................................................
.............................19
ProbationaryPeriod ......................................................................................
.............................19
Employment of Relatives .............................................................................
.............................20
Discipline......................................................................................................
.............................20
ComplaintProcess ........................................................................................
.............................21
Resignation...................................................................................................
.............................22
Termination Process .....................................................................................
.............................22
Compensation...............................................................................................
.............................22
ATTENDANCE AND LEAVE ........................................................................
.............................24
Individual and Department Performance Standards .....................................
.............................24
Emergency Response Attendance ................................................................
.............................24
BusinessMeetings ........................................................................................
.............................25
Training Drills Attendance ...........................................................................
.............................25
Attendance — Business Meetings and Training Drills ..................................
.............................25
31Paoe
-63-
Pa,
Station and Equipment Maintenance ............................................................
.............................26
Familyand Medical Leave ...........................................................................
.............................27
Eligibility......................................................................................................
.............................27
VacationLeave .............................................................................................
.............................27
Leave of Absence or Suspension ..................................................................
.............................27
OffDuty related Medical Leave ...................................................................
.............................28
Line of Duty Medical Leave ........................................................................
.............................29
LightDuty ....................................................................................................
.............................29
MilitaryLeave ..............................................................................................
.............................30
JuryDuty ......................................................................................................
.............................31
CourtTime ................................................................................................... .............................31
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION ... .............................32
Membership.................................................................................................. .............................32
Retirement Program and Pension Benefits ................................................... .............................32
Pension Service Credit Determination ......................................................... .............................32
EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................... .............................33
Performance Reviews and Measurement ..................................................... .............................33
Training and Development — Conferences and Schools .............................. .............................33
Travel and Business Expenses ..................................................................... .............................33
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT RULES AND POLICIES ............................ .............................35
GeneralConduct ........................................................................................... .............................35
Conflictsof Interest ...................................................................................... .............................35
Acceptance of Gifts and Gratuities .............................................................. .............................36
Alcoholand Other Drug Use ........................................................................ .............................36
41Page
.�
P4;
TobaccoUse .................................................................................................
.............................36
Communication Technology and Resources ................................................
.............................37
Media Relations and Public Information ......................................................
.............................37
SocialMedia .................................................................................................
.............................37
Confidential Information .............................................................................
..............................3 8
Dressand Uniform .......................................................................................
.............................38
Driver's Licenses ..........................................................................................
.............................38
AuthorizedDrivers .......................................................................................
.............................39
Special License Plates and Personal Vehicle Identification .........................
.............................39
PersonalAreas ..............................................................................................
.............................39
PoliticalActivity ...........................................................................................
.............................39
RespectfulBehavior .....................................................................................
.............................40
Safetyand Security .......................................................................................
.............................41
Weapons.......................................................................................................
.............................41
FACILITY AND EQUIPMENT USAGE ........................................................
.............................42
GeneralUsage ..............................................................................................
.............................42
ApparatusBay ..............................................................................................
.............................42
OfficeAreas .................................................................................................
.............................42
ExerciseRoan .............................................................................................
.............................42
Fire Department Equipment Usage ..............................................................
.............................42
Visitorsat the Fire Station ............................................................................
.............................43
Property Loss or Damage .............................................................................
.............................43
5 1 P a g e
-65-
P4f
RELATED POLICIES
101.01 Sexual and Other Unlawful Harassment
101.02 Uniforms and Personal Appearance
101.03 Media Relations and Technology Use
101.04 Auto and Fire Vehicle Usage
101.08 Travel Expense
102.01 Physical Agility Testing
104.01- 104.14 Job Descriptions
201.04 Mask Fit Test
301.07 Protective Clothing and Equipment
*Related policies are located in the MFD Administrative Policy and Procedure Manual
61Page
no
P4'
o Mobile Data Computers (MDC)
Laptop
o Wad Tablets
10" tablet with retina display
7" mini tablet
® Large and Expensive
o Slow to Respond
® Stays in vehicle at all
times
o Interface data link
o Two —way communication
Calls on screen
o Fire preplans
Small and Lower Price
o Fast to Respond
o Easy to remove
o Able to take pictures at
scene
o Directions on screen
o Automatic updates
o Calls on screen
Mapping and Directions
e Fire preplans
M.
4/2/2014
1
P4(
Operating Cost (per Unit) Over Five Years
P Cost per unit = $7,400
® Amortized over 60
months = $123.33
Verizon monthly service
fee = $34.99
e Hennepin County
monthly service fee =
$30.25
� Cost per unit = $800.37
o Amortized over 60
months = $13.34
� Verizon monthly service
fee = $34.99
o Apps = $1.00 per month
0 2 Wad mini's installed in station
® 4 10" iPads ordered and ready to install in
apparatus ( #29, #39, #40, #42)
4 more 10" (Pads (as needed) to be ordered the
coming year for additional apparatus
® 10 total IPads for MFD
no
4/2/2014
1
P5(
Contact
Greg Pederson
Telephone
952- 472 -3555
Fax
952- 472 -3775
Email
moundfire @moundfire.com
Website
Moundfirel.com
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 26, 2014
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT PURCHASES THERMAL IMAGING CAMERAS
WITH FUNDS FROM OUR ANNUAL FISH FRY AND A DONATION FROM
THE MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT AUXILIARY
Mound, MN, February 26, 2014— The Mound Fire Department recently purchased two Thermal Imaging
Cameras at a price of $6,100 each. 75% of the costs of the cameras were paid with proceeds from the
Mound Fire Department's Annual Fish Fry, and a donation from the Mound Volunteer Fire Department's
Auxiliary.
A Thermal Imaging Camera (TIC) is an important tool available to our firefighters. TICS have many uses
in fire department operations. In a fire, a firefighter may not be able to see though smoke, but the TIC's
can assist in locating a person by reading different temperatures. When investigating a possible fire, the
TIC can detect "hot spots" inside a wall. A thermal imaging camera will also give useful information
about parts of afire that are still hot. These areas need to be extinguished again in order to prevent
rekindling of a fire.
If you would like more information about this topic, please contact Greg Pederson at 952- 472 -3555 or
email at moundfire @moundfire.com.
-70-
j: \adrrin \public relations \news release \2 -26 -14 tic press release.docx
P5
Contact Vicki Weber FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Telephone 952- 472 -3555
Fax 952- 472 -3775 August 15, 2013
Email gpederson @moundfire.com
website Moundfirel.com
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
Receives Minnesota Fire Board of firefighter Training & Education Grant
The Mound Fire Department is pleased to announce we have been the recipient of the
Minnesota Fire Board of Firefighter Training and Education Grant.
We recently submitted qualified training reimbursement request to the Minnesota Fire
Board of Firefighter Training and Education and were awarded $8,400.00. The Minnesota
Fire Board of Firefighter Training and Education has a Training Reimbursement program
available to fire departments. This award enables the Mound Fire Department to send
many of our company officers and firefighters to various trainings throughout the year to
ensure our department is staffed with competent and skilled firefighters.
-71-
P5:
Contact Greg Pederson
Telephone 952- 472 -3555
Fax 952- 472 -3775
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 27, 2014
Email gpederson @moundfire.com
Website Moundfire.com
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
Receives Lake Minnetonka Conversation District -2014 "Save the Lake" Funds
The Mound Fire Department is pleased to announce we are a recipient of the Lake Minnetonka
Conservation District — 2014 "Save the Lake" Funds.
We recently submitted grant application to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District —
"Save the Lake" Fund and were awarded $4,600.00. Save the Lake is a non - profit fund that
invests in programs that benefit the environmental and recreational needs of Lake
Minnetonka. To qualify, projects must fit into one of three categories: public safety,
environmental, or public service /education. The submitted grant application was for the
purchase of life safety equipment that included two ice rescue suits, a floatable water
pump, and a portable radio with headset. The total equipment cost is $9,200 and will split
between the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Mound Fire Department. This
award enables the Mound Fire Department to continue its tradition of excellence in service
on Lake Minnetonka.
If you would like more information about this topic, please contact Greg Pederson at 952 -472-
3555 or email at gpederson @moundfire.com.
-72-
P5;
Contact Greg Pederson
Telephone 952- 472 -3533
Fax 952- 472 -3775
Email moundfire @moundfire.com
Website moundfire.com
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 1, 2014
SIX FIREFIGHTERS COMPLETE GRUELING PROBATION
Mound, MN, April 1, 2014 —Over its long history, the Mound Fire Department has been very successful
in maintaining a full complement of volunteer firefighters. On March 15, 2014, six new Mound
firefighters completed all of the training and attendance requirements necessary to become permanent
members of the fire department. The time and effort required to meet the essentials of the one year
probationary period are very demanding. Congratulations to new firefighters Nick Farley, Danny Grady,
Chris Heitz, Jed Kobernusz, Aaron Morrison and Dan Patterson! The hiring of these six firefighters helps
support the immediate department staffing needs, and plans ahead as we anticipate future firefighter
retirements. Hiring the six firefighters now will allow us to continue to have a fully trained staff to
continue provide excellent protection now and in the future. If you are interested in becoming a
firefighter with the Mound Fire Department, we are always accepting applications. You can print an
application form by visiting our website www. moundfire.com, or stop by our office.
If you would like more information about this topic, please contact Greg Pederson at 952- 472 -3555 or
email at moundfire @moundfire.com.
-73-
P5,
74-
•
4
.1
pq
s
•
P5!
4/2/2014
Goals:
• to utilize firefighter staff time more efficiently and effectively.
• to minimize unnecessary wasted staff time and reduce the individual
firefighters overall time commitment.
Call out staff when needed, by the specific CAD event type and per the
level of incident risk. High Risk Incident (more staff ALL CALL), Low
Risk Incident (less staff DUTY OFFICER).
Maintain current service quality levels, while continuing to be conscious
of cost controls and tight budgets. No staffing budget increase, plus
maintain our staff!
Why Departments change Firefighter Staff Response?
• Not Enough Volunteer Staff (for Life Safety and Response)
• Short on Volunteer Staff (during specific time periods)
• To Improve Response Times
• Reduce Volunteer Firefighter Time Commitment
• Can be a more efficient use of time for Volunteer Firefighters
• Insure that a well trained Command Officer is on scene
• Use a qualified Officer for non - emergency service calls
-75-
rsf
''
• Less "All Call" Page Outs
• Less "All Call" payroll $$
• Faster "In Service" Time
• Less use of large Apparatus
• Easier Firefighter Tracking
•
Old Perf Measurement
• Easy Administration
• Business as usual
• Existing Officer Requirements
• Old SOP's
• CAD Programming as is
• FD Paging System as is
Cons (Challenges)
• Must have scheduled Shifts
• More shift work payroll $$
• Officer SOP's and Training
• More DO Vehicles needed
• Difficult Firefighter Tracking
• New Perf Measurement
• Difficult Administration
• A Major Change in Operation
• New Officer Requirements
• New SOP's and Training
• CAD Programming Changes
• Paging System Changes
Emergency Response Protocol - Action Plan
• Order necessary Vehicles and Equipment to support the program
• Evaluate the Budgeted Allocation vs. Compensation needed to support
the program and finalize the $ $ payroll system
• Finalize Duty Officer Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) and identify
the specific CAD Event Code types
• Design or Configure a scheduling and new Performance Measurement
system for Officers /Staff
• Set -up the new Duty Officer payroll tracking system
• Complete Basic Training of Officers on program Rules and SOP's
• Implement Duty Officer Test Program (target date May 1, 2013)
• Evaluate Test Program over a period of 3 -6 months, make changes
and /or improvements as necessary
• Implement Duty Officer Program on a full time basis!
-76-
4/2/2014
2
P5'
January —April 5, 2014 Voluntary Test Period
r (14) Weeks — VoluntaryTest Period on Weekends ONLY!
® 24 hour shifts ONLY and on weekends, $50 stipend plus call pay.
a Signup sheet to be posted for signup (weekends only)
April 6, 2014 — Dec. 31, 2014 Full Implementation
(38) weeks in 2014
@ (8) weeks each (5 weekdays) for each Chief Officer
B (8) weekend shifts 24 hrs. each for Captains and Lieutenants
-77-
4/2/2014
3
PSI
0 Sunday Night thru Friday Morning (5) Nights
• I0:00pm — 6:OOam
• 40 Hours per week - $100 per week, plus call pay
® Friday Night —Sunday
• 6:OOpm- 6:OOam Friday /Saturday (12 hours)
• 6:OOam- 6:OOpm Saturday (12 hours)
• 6:OOpm- 6:OOam Saturday /Sunday (12 hours)
• 6:OOam- 6:OOpm Sunday (12 hours)
• 2 -24 hr. shifts per weekend - $75 per shift, plus call pay
• 48 hours of coverage on the weekend
1. Agree on the Test Program for remainder of 2014
2. Implement a Scheduling System for remainder of 2014
3. Finish programing Hennepin County Sherriff Radio CAD
System with Days of Week, DC -DO Tunes, and Call Types.
4. Finalize DC -DO Response SOP
5. Finalize DC -DO Vehicle Use Policy
6. Purchase and Program Fire Pagers, and Implement the DC -DO
Paging System.
7. Finalize DC -DO Incident Report System (Darren - Chief)
8. Create a system for tracking and payroll.
9. Test and Evaluate throughout 2014, adjust as needed.
M
4/2/2014
rd
P5-
Duty Program - SOP Basics DRAFT
• Duty Officer and Vehicle to remain within our Fire District, except
when responding to auto aid into Minnetrista and St. Bonifscius.
• Duty Chief and Vehicle to respond outside our Fire District when
responding to Mutual Aid (outside of Minnetrista and St. Bonifacius)
• When on duty, the DC and /or DO will respond in DC- DOVehicle
directly to scene for every "All Call" page except EMS Medicals or when
responding from the fire station. (Le. during maintenance)
• A Officer can utilize the DC -DO vehicle for personal errands during
scheduled shifts, but must be able to make necessary red runs.
• Unfortunately, no family members to be transported in Duty Vehicles
due to possible emergency response calls.
• DO Vehicle cleanup at end of weekend shift and on Saturday morning
maintenance , and filled with fuel (as needed).
%." i ' • r ` . -: �., • a . Imo. • �, ,.
• During Duty Chief and Duty Officer shifts, the DC -DO are to check
into service with 2 minutes of fire page.
• The DC -DO will be responsible for initial radio communications with
Hennepin County Sherriff Dispatch, and until IC has been transferred.
• Other Mound Fire Officers responding will monitor radio traffic and
respond to dispatch only when necessary.
• The DC -DO will be responsible for transferring their PPE into duty
vehicle. When operating in the hot or warm zone they will wear PPE as
if they arrived on an Engine.
• The first arriving officer at a scene will be the Fire Ground IC at the
incident, and will be responsible for initial size up, 360, resource
management and direction, box alarms, staging, slowing or cancelling
resources, updates, in some cases assuming or transferring command.
-79-
4/2/2014
5
P61
4/2/2014
I ' ! • ' :. 1
• The DC -DO Program is intended to enhance our customer service and
add efficiency to our existing protocols. Dress professionally!
• The DC -DO program is for service calls and faster response IC. It is not
intended to replace 40 firefighters and multiple apparatus.
• Utilize "All Call" option as needed! Error on the side of safety.
• Life Safety and Safe Driving Practices are aTop Priority, therefore Code
3 and Routine Response Protocols must be followed. DRIVE SAFE!
• All Officers must take the time to inspect and survey the DC -DO
Vehicle to locate and identify tools, equipment, forms, and information.
• All Officers must take the time to learn DC -DO Vehicle Operating
Systems (Le. lights, sirens, etc.)
• Duty Chiefs and Duty Officers will be required to create a written
incident report after each DC -DO Call.
:1
P6
MFD DUTY OFFICER
HENNEPIN COUNTY RADIO DISPATCH
EMS EVENTS
FIRE EVENTS
E1- EMS /PRI 1
F1 ......................
Fire /PRI 1
E3- EMS /PRI 3
F3 ......................
Fire /PRI 3
ALLERG- Allergic React
ALMAPT ............
ALM Fire /Apartmt
ALMS - Alarm /Medical
ALMBUS ............
ALM Fire /Busines
AMPUTA- Amputation
ALMCO ..............
ALM Carbon Monox
BLEED - Bleeding
ALMCOE............
ALM C/O Medical
BONE- Broken Bones
ALMFAL............
ALM Fire /False
BREATH - Breathing Problem
ALMHSE ............
ALM Fire /House
BURN -Burn
ALMSCH ............
ALM Fire /School
CHOKE - Choking
ALMTBL............ ALM Fire/Trouble
DIABET- Insulin Problem
APPL ..................
Appliance Fire
DIZZY - Dizzy /Faint
APT ....................
Apartment Fire
DOA - Reported Dead
*ASTFIR .............Assist/Fire
DOWN- Down /Unk Prob
*use for: elevators, manpower
DROWN- Drowning
assists on lifts,
searches, etc
FALL -Fall
BOAT .................
Boat Fire
HEAD -Head Injury
BUS.- ................
Business Fire
HEART -Heart
CAR ...................
Vehicle Fire
ILL -ill
CHIM ..................
Chimney Fire
OB -Birth of Baby
CKBURN ...........
Ck Problem Burn
OD -Drug Overdose
DRILL .................
Drill or Test
PAIN -Pain
DUMPF ..............
Dumpster Fire
POISON- Poison
ELEC .................
Electrical Fire
SEIZ- Seizure
EXPLOS ............
Explosion
SHOOT - Shooting
FIRE4 .................
Fire Out Report
STAB - Stabbing
FIREIV ...............
Fire Investigation
STROKE - Stroke
GARAGE ...........
Garage Fire
SUICID- Suicide
GASO ................
Gas Odor
UNCON- Unconscious
GRASS ..............
Grass Fire
AIR- Aircraft Incident
HAZMAT ... .........
Hazardous Matter
PI- Accident/Injuries
HOUSE ..............
House Fire
Water -Water Incident
INSP ..................Inspection
Lift Assist -Lift Assist
MA (Fire Only) ....
Mutual Aid
PRACTI ..............
Practice Burn
RESCUE............
Rescue /Extricate
SCHOOL............
School Fire
Important Note: The bold and
SMOKE ..............
Smoke See /Smell
highlighted CAD event codes are the
SPILL .................
Spill
event types that will be responded to by
SYSTEM ............
System Down
a MFD Duty Officer ONLY unless DO
TREE .................
Tree /Pole Fire
request ALL CALL.
WASH... .............
Washdown
WIREA ...............
Wire Arcing
WIRED ...............
Wire Down
-81-
eAduty officer program overview 8 -2013 \ems - fire events - duty crew.doc
P6:
l
MN
PK
M
2
P64
m
u
C:
E�.
40.
L.
M
2
P64
.:,,:.fit
,:
7
OR J
H
r!
4-
Q%
LL
0
•
•
U
c
•
•
•
t
•
1
•
n
a�
L
iz
a.i
v
N
L
U
0
L
Co
c
C6
N
f0
c
O
.N
c
CL
c
0
fB
�U
0
N
Q
c
V)
_N
c
0
U
a)
c
fLi
c
0
f�
U
0
Ln
N
Q
0
¢-+
f0
c
0
f6
L
V)
N
EZ
Q
c
0
�N
0
c
0
.N
c
0
c
0
CL
0
U
0
N
L
0
Q
0
m
Ln
m
0
a)
c
cc
G
E
L-
0
V)
Q1
i
dD
4J
L
4-
0
L
0
L
d-j
N
0
N
Ln
4-
fD
U
c
(0
N
0
72
L.
U
N
0
z
4-J
c L
cu
E .n
0 E
ftS 0
cn E
f0
L
U
U
c
0
c
Q1
Q
(g
c
[O
c
m
N
0
w
C
0
N
.5
0
Q
fp
L
U
U
f6
_0
�N
c
0
Q
fII
0
to
i
N
f0
co
c
0
4{
�U
0
N
Q
4-
0
0
LL
Q�
3
f�
m
..c
4-J
c
.c
.3
Qi
c
4-
Q�
N
N
40+
f0
L
[0
Q
Q)
N
0
0
L
0
.p-.+
L�
a�
U
0
.0
C
PO
Firefighter Participation, Performance, and Training Summary
Name /Rank: Joe Firefighter Hire Date 01/01/06 Years of Service as of: 1/112014 8.00
Section If - Job Performance Data 2009.2013
Total
Year Calls
Resp. %
Rank
Truck -1.
Rank
O.I.C.
Rank
Maint.
Rank
Training
In
20
2009 550
246 45%
16
15%
11
1
n/a
27.5
7
25
100%
.010 b77
262 4594
17
2244
8
1
n/a
27.6
10
27
108:4
2011 615
247 4D°I°
22
14%
15
0
n/a
25.5
10
28
112%
2012 554
202 36%
23
16%
12
3
n/a
23.25
12
26
104%
2013 558
196 35%
30
17%
14
17
9
27
9
26
173%
2013 Dept. Ave,
533
225
43%
20
13%
22
31
7
24
20
23 of 23
103%
3 year average
576
215
37%
25
16%
14
7
3
25
10
27
110%
3 Yr. Dept. Ave.
557
242
44%
21
13•k
21
34
7
25
18
j 24 of 24
99'/,
YM Totals 1 3 1 1 5 F_ 1 3 1 9.00 1 1 14 1 15,38% 1 2 1 1
Comments:
'OO'
P6t
West Hennepin (or bakes Area) Fire Group
October 10, 2013
Agenda
I. General Discussion
• Fire Department Partnerships or Consolidation Feasibility
• Fire Chief and Individual Department List of Objectives
• Concepts and Ideas — Brainstorming
• Political and City Officials support and /or role
II. Opportunities and Challenges
• Advantages or Opportunities
• Disadvantages, Problems, Obstacles, and Challenges
III. Planning and Implementation
• Strategic Planning — Short Term and Long Term
• Financial Considerations and Budgets
• Implementation Plan and Timing
IV. Problems and Concerns
• Individual Fire Departments maintaining identity
• Organizational Structure
• Staffing Plan (of fire stations)
• Pension Plan disparity or gaps
• Other Issues
P6'
Advantages:
• Better overall strategic planning for future with longer term contracts.
• Restructuring administration for effectiveness and efficiency
• Financial consolidation efficiency and more consistency.
• Improved service through efficient resources utilization.
• Much improved fire operations, through strategic planning, and staffing.
• Improved Capital Equipment and Fire Apparatus Capital planning.
• Better, more consistent firefighter training.
• Standardization of documentation for all fire departments
• Utilization of existing facilities, apparatus, equipment, staff
Challenges:
• Allocation of financial revenue appropriately.
• Current wage and Pension Plan inconsistencies.
• Proper allocation and placement of fire apparatus and equipment.
• Maintaining fire department identity and ownership.
• Establishment of appropriate / acceptable organizational structure.
Other Issues:
Future fire station study and placement.
Recruitment and allocation of firefighter personnel for stations.
Long term budget forecasting and cost control
Other assumptions or considerations as part of the hire District or Partnership solution:
• The implementation time frame or start up date will be January xx, 20xx.
• Full implementation will be a work in progress and will be an ongoing continuous
improvement project.
• One, all inclusive Fire Department District Budget will be submitted which will contain
all aspects of the budget: Administration, Operations, Pension Plan funding, Facilities,
Capital Equipment and Apparatus Plan, a combined Staffing Plan.
• The overall Fire Protection costs will likely not be reduced, however core services will
continue to improve, and certainly be more efficient and effective long term.
• A 10 year contract agreement will be in place.
• Fire Station Facilities: utilize the existing fire station facilities
• Expansion and additional fire stations will be necessary in the future; stations will be
built and operated by the Fire District.
-87-
2
P68
• Minimal Capital Apparatus or Equipment purchases required (short term) as we use
existing apparatus and deploy or locate as necessary.
• Full time staff needs will be evaluated, and more full staff will be budgeted.
• The staffing models and fire department response protocols will change, utilizing more
time conscious efficient methods (not a cost savings) such as Duty Officer, Duty Crews,
and All Call paging concepts. Firefighter numbers will remain similar to current staffing
levels, may fluctuate + or — 10 % depending on staffing models.
• Computer Aided Dispatch "CAD Zones" will be evaluated, redrawn, and reconfigured as
necessary to improve response times and efficiency.
• Primary Protection and Geographical Fire Areas (which fire department "Primarily"
serves the geographic area) will be redrawn and department response by CAD Event
Types will be evaluated and reconfigured.
• Automatic Mutual Aid will be more prevalent and expanded.
• All OSHA Laws and relevant NFPA Standards will be adhered to meet firefighter safety,
response times, and service quality objectives
Mound Fire Chief Greg Pederson
Updated October 10, ?013
P69
S45 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD JERSEY CITY, N1 07310 -1686
TEL 1 -800- 444 -4554
Pre - survey Information Request
For
Fire Department Features for Fire Suppression
ISO is the principal provider of underwriting, rating, and statistical information to the insurance
industry in the United States. An important part of the information ISO provides to insurers is a
community's Public Protection Classification (PPCTM) number. The PPC program evaluates
community fire suppression delivery systems according to a uniform set of criteria, incorporating
nationally recognized standards developed by the National Fire Protection Association.
As part of the PPC program, ISO conducts evaluations for fire suppression. This section of the review
constitutes 50% of the available PPC score for the community.
Following is a twelve -page questionnaire. Please record as much of the information as possible on
these forms. For questions that do not apply to your community, please indicate "does not apply"
or "DNA."
I will be meeting with you on 15 -Apr at 09:00 hrs
with the location being: Mound Fire Department
If you have any questions concerning this questionnaire, please contact me.
My phone number is cell:(763)360 -4717, office:(651)213 -3104 and my email address is
sungericht @iso.com.
Thank you,
Steve Ungericht, Field Representative
Insurance Services Office, Inc.
i
P70
ISO's Public Protection Classification (PPCTn) Service gauges the fire protection capability of the local fire
department to respond to structure fires In a property in which your company has a financial stake.
ISO collects information on a community's public fire protection and analyzes the data using our Fire
Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS). We then assign a Public Protection Classification from i to 10. Class 1
represents the best public protection, and Class 10 Indicates no recognized protection.
By classifying a community's ability to suppress fires, ISO provides crucial Information for understanding the
entire landscape of risk associated with a specific property. We have extensive Information on more than
47,000 fire - response jurisdictions.
Choose the Information medium that best suits your needs. Public Protection Classifications are available in
various electronic formats, and through LOCATION®,. ISO's risk - assessment tool.
ISO releases the latest updates to PPC listings through the Community Mitigation Classification (CIVIC)
Modified Jurisdictions pages.
For more information on ISO's public - protectlon ratings, read ISO's PPC Program: Helping to Build Effective
Fire- Protection Services and Effective Fire Protection: A National Concern.
•1
P71
CO
I
I r►
•
i'
N
M
f
-92-
4
i
•
i
I t
�.
f`
q •
•
f
-
\ \�
Cd
,
/
t2
\Q \\
\_
_-
_
\\ \G
�
-
y
�
-93-
�
�\
�
�
�
.. �
«
i
m
\ \// /7`
f \ \ \-ch
0) 00 /.
/o LM
ƒ\ �
:
Lei
\
\ \�»
/ / / / / / \r4
f%\% ƒ9 %@
± / i0 \0a// 0
Via:
: \\
ro ; \ / / \k7
/////~
/ % @$
���Z\
0
* ¥m *fm 6 l \\
.. . : ti � a
m
W
ct
I
Q)
0
r14 Ln
Ln C4
C�4 M
C-4 C6
nrommig.2
im
U
V
0
0-
-95-
Poll')
4..�
I
I
z
&it
CL
-0
0
0
0
t),O
E:
Ln
co
-2
I
z
&it
od
ril .4
4
® ® 00 %D v
-97-
i
9
►M
i
d-�
to
Q
:T
•
L
U
u
cd
�
CL
0)
0
E
O
O
O
w
=
L
m
4J
® ® 00 %D v
-97-
i
9
►M
i
d-�
to
Q
:T
•
C'q
;
to
q
o �aQ
t
4-1
a
q yp�p
lFd
Cd
Cd
7
.•
.,
Ln O N
m
U
m
W
fU
t
C
a)
U
C
C
O
O
C6
N
V)
L
Y-
(V
U)
CY)
O
N
®
®
°
��ppqq
W
�M V
to
y
�
E
d
�
Cd
L
L
b0
0
N
i
O
O
L
m
U
m
W
fU
t
C
a)
U
C
C
O
O
C6
N
V)
L
Y-
(V
U)
CY)
O
N
4-j
ct
0.1.4
0
CN
Cd
P'li
Cd
Cd
4-J
4—)
Cd
M
r:l
9
C) C) 0 0 0
0 Ln C) Ln
N — —
NOM
el
os
%
pf
Apl
VO%
990
a,
O/X
75
c
U)
70
C
D
0
tB
O
ce)
a
-100-
�4
-101-
�
L
O
O
�
�
a
=
E
N
Ln
cd
O
v
4J
'O
�
L
�
4-1
u
E
®
N
®
u
ta0
cd
c
®
v&
Ncc3
N
�
_
O
O
co
u
b 0
=
u
L
N
0
C
4.J
v'
o
Ln
W
N
N
N
u>
N
cd
4-J
t
u
p
�
o
EF
u
.
.
.
.
.
.
-101-
•
-102-
r•
9
•
•
s
FA
-
-103-
-
/
.
a
2
:
•
.
\
:
\
#
»�
.:
■
°©
c
•
•
? ,«
\
?
E
\
j
■
•
2
•
©
\
)
.
}
}
f
a
.
j
.
\«
0
t
.
�^
2
:
.
o
c
/
-
-103-
a
Q)
i
-104-
a�
N
N
L
L
S
0
0
N
N
0
E
E
N
0
V
N
L
i-+
r
O1
CN
C
Nc
N
?,
L
N
tw
M
C
(d
b.0
E
L
W
..0
V)
N
4J
v-
co
M
%D
QS
®
V-
oll
w
r�
co
LO
—
N
Ln
M
M
—
Ln
N
W
L
S-
4-1
U
X
W
V)
L
V)
Q
LL
N
N
td
771
C
MC
C
N
®
N
O
0
Cd
N
N
U
FL
a)
td
U
0
V
�
u
U
E
N
G
N
b.0
N
D
y
C
.0
Ct
-104-
a�
N
N
L
L
S
0
0
N
N
0
E
E
N
0
V
N
L
i-+
r
O1
(1)
0
0
ct
bf)
a
4-J
W
Ull
-105-
Date: April 4, 2014
To: City Mayor and City Council
2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 -1668
HM: (9b2) 472 -0600
FAX: (952) 472 -0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
From: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administrative Services
Subject: Finance /Clerk/Docks Annual Report to the Council
My first responsibility is the supervision of staff. The current personnel that comprise
the Finance and Administrative Services Department include:
NAME TITLE STARTING DATE
Collette Roberts Accounting Clerk/Payroll /Accounts Payable 03 -12 -99
Amy Stark Public Works Admin Asst/Accounting Clerk 04 -08 -13
Noah Iverson Accountant 03 -19 -14
Ron Stanchfield Part-Time Docks Inspector 05 -14 -09
Catherine Pausche Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer 09 -01 -06
The following pages summarize the 2013 accomplishments, efforts underway, and
future goals and needs of the department. I appreciate the support of the City Manager
and City Council in accomplishing these objectives.
Department of Finance and Administration
Accomplishments
— Annual Levy and Budget: Submitted budget with (1.18 %) overall levy decrease.
Analyzed utility rates and made recommendations.
— Financial Audit: In May of 2013 we issued the Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report for the year ended December 31, 2012. We received the Certificate of
Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting.
— Financial Activity: We were able to meet, on a timely basis, all deadlines,
including reporting, payroll, vendor payments, collection of funds, bank deposits,
investment of idle funds, UB monthly billing and collection of payment, and all
other financial activity.
-106 -
printed on recycled paper
— Municipal Bond sales: Issued $6.27M in bonds for 2013 projects and $2.495M in
refunding bonds /new money to save on interest without lengthening the term.
Maintained our AA/Stable rating from Standard and Poors.
— Union Negotiations: Helped to achieve a settlement for 2013 & 2014 as of
August 2013 with a settlement of $0.50 per hour wage increase in 2013 and
$0.50 per hour wage increase in 2014 and a $25 increase per year to the
dependent coverage insurance contribution.
— Recycling /Leaf Drop -off: We held a spring clean up day, and continued our
contracts with NRG for leaf drop -off (flat rate) and Republic Waste Services for
curbside recycling (flat rate).
— Technology: Managed server maintenance /help desk support contract. Helped
manage the upgrade of the fire department server.
— Procurement/Contracts — renegotiated the 15 year Cable Franchise Agreement
with Mediacom.
— Housing: Managed Property Management Agreement with Common Bond
Communities. Continue to manage capital grants, including Davis Bacon and
other HUD reporting. Heavily involved with a contentious eviction action.
Worked on a plan with Common Bond to increase occupancy rates and continue
to explore disposition alternatives.
— Benefits: Explored options with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
(PPACA) but stayed with current provider for 2014.
— Shared Services — Continued to help manage the transition with the City of
Orono Police Department. Helped coordinate lease agreements for Centennial
Building and the move of City Hall to the former police space.
— Reorganization — Created the Finance and Administrative Services Department
in December of 2012 and assumed the Clerk and Dock Administration duties.
Outsourced Utility Billing to a third party provider, filled the vacant Accounting
Clerk position in April of 2013 and the Accountant position in February of 2014.
Efforts underway, but not yet completed:
— Public Housing — Consider options to relinquish ownership of building.
— Union Negotiations: 2014 — 2015 contract negotiations with Public Works should
begin this fall.
— Bonding - Calculate Arbitrage Rebate on the 2009 bond Issues, assess
opportunities to refinance bond issues at a lower rate, and determine long -term
financing needs.
Goals /needs of the department:
— Policy Development — Continue to collaborate with Council and Management
Team to come up with creative solutions to financial challenges. Ensure leaders
are making informed decisions.
— Audit -- Implement the audit requirement to document specific internal
accounting controls and internal controls in general. Create /update employee
manual to ensure adequate communication of key policies and procedures.
-107-
— Formalize the long -term financial management planning process to satisfy
requirements of the investors and rating agencies as well as provide for
responsible /managed growth. Analyze allocation methodologies to ensure
proper accounting of costs of providing services and create accountability within
the departments.
—TIF -- Coordinate the assembly of TIF documentation and ensure compliance
with State statutes and optimization of the use of funds. Work with Planning
Department and City Attorney to ensure proper execution of our developer
agreement
— Training /Staff Development — Update job descriptions to reflect the change in
responsibilities, continue cross - training and procedure documentation. Develop
training plan and identify employee recognition opportunities.
— Technology: Develop a long -term technology plan and establish priorities.
Conduct individual PC audits /maintenance. Get employee website up and
running with feeds from Gallagher Benefit Services. Expand use of Laserfiche
throughout the organization, identify critical systems and IT infrastructure needs
to further automate processes and provide for disaster recovery.
— Procurement — Take advantage of cooperative purchasing ventures, review
contracts with vendors, consultants and service providers to ensure we are
optimizing our resources. Issue RFP for credit card services.
City Clerk
Accomplishments
— Completed new assessment certifications to Hennepin County within the required
timeframes
— Maintained new website using GovOffice
— Shadowed Hopkins City Clerk during the general election.
— Attended Hennepin County elections training and managed the lease of new
equipment.
— Prepared minutes, resolutions and ordinance amendments as needed. Audited
changes to official City Code.
— Issued licenses and permits.
— Introduced "Get to Know Your City Code" section of newsletter.
—Completed move to new City Hall and purging of old records.
Efforts underway, but not yet completed
— Update the City Code for 2012 / 2013 / 2014 changes.
— Administer the 2014 primary and general elections.
— Recruit and train new election judges due to reduction in City staff.
— Scanning and storage of city documents /records will always be an ongoing
project due to its nature. There are still a few boxes of old City Manager files that
need to be gone through and either purge or scan records.
— Compile City Policy Manual that will incorporate all individual department policies
into one manual
m
Goals /needs of the department
— Reassess City Clerk duties to ensure they are performed on a timely and
accurate basis and that synergies are achieved with other departments.
— Formalize procedures, automate license application process where possible,
develop task lists to ensure proper accountability.
Dock Administration
Accomplishments
— Completed 2013 Dock Enrollment.
— Proposed new City Code language for Lost Lake Slip assignment priorities, Lost
Lake Slips fee changes to help support debt service on the dump bonds, and a
one -time grace for non - abutters who missed the end of February deadline.
— Completed dock inspections during season and handled all complaints /requests
from dock program participants.
— Completed the shoreline improvement study that will help set priorities for capital
improvement/rip -rap projects.
— Enacted changes to the dock and slip fees, reduced payroll, both of which freed
up funds for the capital improvement/rip -rap projects.
Efforts underway, but not yet completed
— Complete the 2014 Dock Enrollment.
— Explore potential City Code language modifications to address boat lifts at
multiple -slip sites.
—City Manager leading effort to regulate business being conducted on public
lands.
Goals /needs of the department
— Explore alternatives to the application process — multi -year renewals, charging to
Utility Billing
— Reassess LMCD license fees, which is the top error on applications.
— Explore alternatives for marking dock sites, need for setbacks, and /or relief of
congestion.
KO
j�
t �
Community Development Department
Annual Report to City Council for 2013
On behalf of the Community Development Department, I am pleased to present the 2013
Annual Report to the City Council for review and consideration.
STAFF. The Department is staffed by Administrative Assistant Jill Norlander who was hired in
February 2001. My tenure as Community Development Director for the City of Mound began
in July 2001. The Planning and Building Department is also provided technical support from
Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson who began working for the City of Mound in May
2005.
CONSULTANT SERVICES. The Building Official position was eliminated in January 2005 and
full -time building inspection services were assumed by MnSpect on a contract basis. The
current contract, approved on December 11, 2012 is in effect until December 31, 2015. Scott
Qualle is the designated Building Official. Rita Trapp of HKGi has been providing consultant
planning services to the City of Mound since June 2005.
BUILDING PERMIT SUMMARY
Building Permit Information 2005 -2013.
Year
Building Permits
Valuation
2013
199
10,410,249
2012
311
$8,162,212
2011
411
$8,053,468
2010
535
$7,264,815
2009
302
$4,748,360
2008
269
$ 5,223,741
2007
258
$10,855,936
2006
329
$17,709,317
2005
385
$14,148,260
-110-
CODE ENFORCEMENT. The Community Development Department receives assistance and support
from Staff and other Departments with regard to code violations, complaints and nuisance related
issues. The majority of complaint related issues (i.e. exterior storage, inoperative vehicles, etc.) are
handled by Community Service Officer Mike Wocken. Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson
assists on grading/drainage and other related matters. The cooperation we receive from Staff is
exemplary and we are specifically appreciative of the efforts of Kandis Hanson, Mike Wocken and Ray
Hanson.
PLANNING COMMISSION CASES. A summary of the planning cases from 2005 -2013 is provided
below:
2013 (35)
2012 (25)
2011 (14)
2010 (13)
2009 (15)
2008 (17)
2007 (32)
2006 (51)
2005 (84)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. Provided below is a list of projects which were undertaken
and /or completed by the Community Development Department. It is important to note that many of
of these projects were done in cooperation and with assistance from other Departments /Consultants.
• Temporary approvals for Mound Farmers' Market and More and New Morning Church
• CUP approvals for Johnny's Garden Center, Bay Rentals, Centennial Building, City and Fire
Administration Building and MCES wastewater treatment facility
• Subdivision, land use and development agreement approvals for The Landings on Lost Lake
and Woodlyn Ridge
• Completion of downtown Mound marketing study and presentation at Council workshop and
presentation at Mound Magic III held at Al and Alma's Supper Club
-111-
• Review and processing of request from Hennepin County for review of Tax Forfeit list 1624 -
C/NC for (3) parcels in Mound
• Building permit approvals for Dakota Junction restaurant /bistro and Westonka Animal Clinic
• Research and review of Mound parking regulations and approval of zoning ordinance
amendments (adopted January 2014)
• Preparation of urban agriculture report for backyard chicken and bees
• Upcoming:
- Expansion permit regulations review
- Pawn shop regulations
- Exotic animals
Updated marketing materials
SUMMARY. On behalf of the Community Development Department, I would like to express my
sincere thanks to the City Council and Planning Commission for their dedication and commitment to
our department and to the City of Mound. The countless hours that are spent on land use and
permitting issues do not go unnoticed. Additionally, I would like to thank the other City departments
and consulting staff that have provided assistance and staff support throughout the year. It is an
honor and a privilege to work with such dedicated individuals who assist in every area of my job and
also make it fun to come to work every day. As always, we welcome any suggestions or comments
that the City Council may have. You can be assured that we will continue our endeavors to improve
efficiency and customer service in our Department.
-112-
�, . � i . �
-113-
I V.11 all lf�[ITM i7INliVYi1I
I. Parks Division 2013 Annual Report ............ ............................... 1 - 3
II. Public Works 2013 Annual Report ............ ............................... 4 - 6
III. Public Works Department 2013 Capital Improvements .................. 7 - 8
IV. Public Works Department Work Plan / Initiatives ......................... 9-10
-114-
Parks Division
2013 Annual Report
The Parks Division is responsible for managing the 33 parks in the city, the maintenance and
management of the Municipal Cemetery, aspects of the Municipal Docks Program, Municipal
Buildings, Transit Center Parking Deck, Mound Bay Park Depot, and the Veterans Memorial
Plaza. In addition, the division is responsible of the inspection of weeds on unkempt grounds,
and hazardous tree removal from city property. The division is also responsible for the
preventive maintenance of its equipment.
Assisting in this effort are three full -time parks maintenance employees along with seasonal
maintenance employees. The Parks, Open & Space Commission (POSC) function as an advisory
board for bringing recommendations to the City Council regarding relevant issues.
General Comments
During 2013, the Parks Division was involved mainly with maintaining current playground
equipment and lands. In past years, we have seen improvements to Avalon, Belmont, Chester,
Dundee, Langdon, Philbrook, Seton, Swenson, Three Points, Tyrone Park, Alwin Park, Belmont,
Weiland, Scherven and Seton Park.
Along with development, maintenance for the parks must be planned. Maintenance and upkeep
of the parks is a major ingredient for their success. Regular mowing, leaf removal, litter pick up
and periodic repairs are aspects of the parks and
These improvements and maintenance provide a
a commitment to the community.
generally take up the most hours over the year.
visual confirmation that the City of Mound has
The downtown Streetscape and Greenway completed in 2006 has had the routine maintenance
turned over to the Parks Division. It is staff's belief that this amenity is high priority for
maintenance scheduling. The Streetscape and Greenway are visited daily to provide a well
groomed entrance into the main business area of Mound.
Parks maintenance staff have been at the Island Park Garage since 1989. Following a 1987
engineering improvement recommendation report, a new roof was installed in 1990, and
electrical updates, new garage doors and exterior painting were completed in 1991. Major
foundation repairs and driveway reconstruction were completed in 2012. A facilities study
conducted in 2002 noted that the Park Maintenance Facility continues to need improvements.
Staff is looking forward to the consideration of moving the Parks Maintenance Division to a joint
complex with the Public Works Division.
-115-
Hazardous Tree Removal
As of December 31, 2013, the yearly total of hazardous tree removals from City property was 42
trees removed, 11 stumps chipped, 21 trees trimmed that posed a hazard, and 12 sites had brush
removed. From private property, 5 trees were marked for owner removal due to hazardous
conditions. Of the 5 trees 1 was contracted for removal by the City as Forced Removal.
Diseased and hazardous trees are removed on a complaint basis. When a complaint is received,
an inspection of the tree is done to determine the need for removal and the ownership. City
owned trees are removed by a contractor as soon as possible, while private trees are removed in
accordance with City Ordinances. Private trees not removed in the grace period allowed, are
force removed. The cost of a force removed tree is billed to the property owner. If this bill is
not paid, it is then assessed to their property taxes for the following year.
Weed Notices
In 2013 approximately 78 weed notices were issued by the Community Service Officer for
unkempt grounds. Of which 69 owners' complied with the work requirement. The 9 non-
compliance properties had the work performed by a City hired contractor. The cost incurred by
the City is on these non - complying properties are billed to the owner. If the owner does not pay,
the cost is assessed to their property taxes.
Depot and Island Park Facilities
No improvements have been made at the Depot building since 1998 when interior carpeting,
painting, cabinets, fans and lighting were completed. In 2003, a new curb and asphalt parking lot
was completed. In 2011 a new shingle roof was installed. The facility is currently being utilized
for local organizational meetings and private parties. User response has been very positive.
Improvements will reinforce the Depot as an asset to our City.
Depot Rental Rates
$350 check/$50 cash Damage and Clean-up Deposit
$250 /per day Non -Mound Residents
$125 /per day Mound Resident
$25.00 /per day Mound Westonka Community Civic and Non -Profit
Charitable Organizations
Fees were waived on 22 groups, resident payments totaled $5,000.00, non - resident payments
totaled $250.00, Civic and Non -Profit payments totaled $300.00. The total rental payments
received was $5550.00.
The Island Park building has had the utilities turned off. This facility is currently being used as a
storage area for Parks and Docks storage. Only minimum maintenance is performed on this
building. Vandalism has led to the windows being boarded up rather than being replaced. Staff
has concerns of the building posing a hazard and obtained estimates for it removal.
-116-
2
City Hall Maintenance / Janitorial
The Parks Division is responsible for the seasonal lawn care and snow removal at City Hall. It is
also responsible year -round for the heating and air conditioning inside City Hall and the
Centennial Building. Parks staff is also responsible, within their capabilities, for the repairs to
plumbing, heating and related equipment. Major repairs for the heating and air conditioning
systems and cleaning services are contracted out through the direction of the Parks Division.
Janitorial duties are contracted to an outside vendor.
Parks & Open Space Commission
The Parks & Open Space Commission is made up of 5 members, including a City Council
Representative for the commission. Their responsibilities include:
PARKS:
• Parks /wetlands and related concerns
• Cemetery operation
• Island Park Hall and Depot building repairs
• Nature Conservation areas
• Swimming beaches
• Depot rental and use
• Budget preparation
• Park Improvements
• Adopt A Green Space
Issues discussed and reviewed in 2013:
• Park Cleanup Special Events
• Dispersal of funds for playground structure purchase
• Dog Park
• Adopt a Park Program
Equipment Maintenance and Replacement
Preventive and unplanned maintenance of all related equipment is the daily responsibility of the
Parks & Docks Division. The Parks Division follows the equipment replacement schedule which
allows for the replacement of equipment on a planned schedule based on its age and
serviceability. This schedule will allow the Parks & Docks Division to operate efficiently and
provide safety for the general public and the parks crew.
-117-
3
Public Works Department
2013 Annual Report
2013 At A Glance
The 2013 street improvement project will be completed this spring with the placement of the
final wearing course of bituminous. A number of new watermain gate valves were installed
along with new watermain. One new lift station on Three Points Blvd. at Glen Elyn was also put
into service. The sewer department worked with a Michels Contracting on our Inflow /
Infiltration (I / I) reduction project. These consisted of repair of bad connections and complete
lining of over 2600 feet of sewer pipe in various locations.
Personnel
There are 9 full time employees in the Public Works Departments. The Superintendent
responsibilities include evaluation of employees, scheduling of work, delegation of projects and
tasks, budget preparation, reports, determination of emergency call -outs, construction meetings,
project inspections, purchasing of materials and equipment, answering questions, resolving
complaints, etc.
The Public Works Director is in charge of both Public Works and Parks. There is one full -time
Administrative Assistant for both Public Works and Parks.
The MPCA requires that the City have at least one full -time employee with Class C certification
in Water Supply Operations and one full -time employee with Class SD certification in
Wastewater treatment. Certificates are renewed every three years. All employees receive
continuous training and education at various schools, seminars and conferences. The city
contracts with Safe - Assure to keep us in compliance with OSHA standards and regulations. This
training is done once a month. Along with this training, the city has a Risk Management
inspection conducted by the LMCIT every year.
Street/ Fleet Division
The primary function of the Street Department is to maintain and repair the city streets and storm
sewers. This includes plowing and snow removal, sanding, sweeping, clearing street right -of-
ways of brush and tree limbs, bituminous patching, street preparation for seal coating, repair and
maintenance of storm sewer catch basins, street sign repair and installation, curb and sidewalk
repair, street lighting, equipment maintenance, installation and repair of banners and Christmas
decorations, 12 parking lots, 27 cul -de -sacs, and 11 miles of sidewalks.
During the winter months, it is the responsibility of the public works superintendent to determine
when to plow and chemically treat the streets. The public works superintendent depends on the
National Weather Service, local weather reports for information concerning weather systems moving
in our direction and the Police Department to keep staff updated on road conditions. The public works
-118-
4
superintendent will also periodically check the streets to determine if and when plowing and sanding
may be needed or should begin. If at all possible, waiting until it stops snowing before plowing is
preferred, but in icy conditions trucks will be sent out as soon as possible. Personnel from Streets,
Sewer, Water and Parks are all called out to help with plowing. The city has 5 single axle trucks
equipped with front plows, side wings, and sanders. In addition the city also has 5 four -wheel drive
pickup trucks with plows, 3 1 -ton dumps with plows and sanders, 1 skid -steer and 2 snow machines
for the 11 miles of sidewalks. This year we contracted snow removal in the Central Business District.
Right -of -way repair and maintenance begins in early spring. This includes repair of watermain break
patches, tree trimming, hanging summer banners, storm sewer cleaning, and street sweeping. Street
sweeping is a major time consuming task. The City has 2 street sweepers, 2 sidewalk brooms, 2 trucks
for hauling, and 1 tanker truck. Following a normal winter of sanding, street and sidewalk sweeping
can take up to 3 to 4 weeks to complete. Once the sweeping is completed, we prepare for seal coating
projects and other street repairs. Every year, the Street Department also attempts to repair as many
sidewalks as possible. On average, the city replaces 10 sections of sidewalk and approximately 100
feet of curbing per year.
The City storm sewer system is very large with 584 catch basins, which are cleaned once a year,
and 84 sump catch basins, which are cleaned twice a year. While we still contract out the larger
repairs, the storm water fees we now receive allow us to make yearly repairs and upgrades to the
system.
Utilities Division:
The Utilities Division for the City of Mound consists of 3 areas; water distribution, sanitary
sewer collection and storm sewer. The Utilities Division operates much like a business.
Revenues are generated from the sale of water to over 3500 customers, from meter sales, and
service charges. Salaries, benefits and operating expenses are paid from the revenues received.
There are three budgets prepared for the Utilities Division; one for the Water Department, one
for the Sanitary Sewer Department, and one for Storm Sewer Department. Line item expenses
for each department does not vary much from year to year. The biggest percentage of the budget
each year is for salaries, capital outlay, workers compensation, liability insurance and the Met
Council sewer charges.
Water
The City has 3 wells, one of which is for emergency back -up only, one booster station, and a
combined storage of 750,000 gallons in 2 towers and 265,000 in 1 standpipe. There are
approximately 45 miles of watermain. The city is interconnected to the City of Spring Park at the
Seton Bridge, and there are 2 interconnections with the City of Minnetrista. The Water
Department is responsible for, among other things, meter readings, tower inspections and
hydrant flushing. In 2013, we pumped 241,910,000 gallons of water. Every 5 -7 years, the City's
water towers are inspected for the condition of the coating and anodes inside the towers. The
water system is flushed out twice a year in order to reduce rust problems for our customers.
-119-
5
Sewer
The Sewer Department is responsible for maintaining 30 sewer lift stations, which are checked
twice a week, and sewer line cleaning. They also perform pump repair, electrical repairs, pump
removal and seal replacement. Major repairs are contracted out. The City's insurance company
(LMCIT) has given us a timetable to complete the cleaning of 60 miles of sewer main in the City
every 4 years, which means we would need to clean about 80,000 feet per year. Given our
current manpower situation, we are only able to clean 40,000 to 50,000 feet per year. The current
sewer system, installed in 1964, is in dire need of repair. In 2002, the city began televising the
sanitary sewer system with a camera that enables us to detect problem areas. The 2003 Street
Reconstruction Project enabled us to begin upgrading and repairing some of these areas.
Upgrades and repairs are expected to continue with future Street Reconstruction and Sewer
Lining Projects.
Storm Sewer
There are 545 stone catch basins, and approximately 93 outlets. The storm sewer system is being
upgraded through the annual Street Reconstruction Project. The city started a program for the
cleaning of the storm outlets in 2008. Scheduled maintenance for cleaning the lines begins in the
spring of each year.
-120-
Public Works Department
2013 Capital Improvement Projects & Initiatives
Street Reconstruction Proiect
The 2013 Street improvement project on the East part of the Island is nearly completed with just
the final wearing course of Asphalt and restoration to be completed. The City Council approved
the 2014 street, utility and retaining wall improvement project is Three Points Blvd. and is
anticipated to start construction in May.
Retaining Wall Replacement Proiect
The annual retaining wall replacement program provides for the reconstruction of retaining walls
in various locations throughout the city determined to be in poor condition. This is the tenth year
of the retaining wall replacement program. The retaining wall replacement project includes the
removal of the existing walls and construction of decorative modular concrete block walls and
site restoration.
Seal Coat Program
The seal coat program is proposed again this year will include the reconstructed streets in the
Tonkawood area.
Storm Sewer
The City Engineer is reviewing locations that are in need of storm sewer improvements for 2014.
Sanitary Lift Stations
One sanitary sewer lift station was reconstructed in 2013 as part of the street reconstruction
project and is located on Three Points Blvd. at Glen Elyn. New underground wet pits and
control panels, pumps and SCADA were included in the project. The Council approved the
reconstruction of one lift station in 2014 on Grandview Blvd.
Inflow /Infiltration Study
The City Engineer completed a study of the sanitary sewer lift stations and Inflow / Infiltration
into the sewer lines. The results of this study will determine where the city needs to perform pipe
lining in future years to come into compliance with the Metropolitan Council Environmental
Services directive to reduce the amount of I /I or pay surcharge penalties. It is anticipated the city
will be able to avoid the surcharge by following the study recommendations.
-121-
7
OTHER HIGHLIGHTS
• Public Works staff is always researching the availability of grants for a variety of possible
projects. Two grants were awarded to the city for sanitary sewer lining/ repairs (MCES)
and one for storm water treatment (MCWD).
• Staff annually updates the vehicle replacement program to better manage and forecast
future vehicle and replacement needs and costs.
• Staff annually reviews the long range infrastructure repair and replacement needs of the
City's storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and watermain. The results are incorporated into the
City's capital improvement program.
-122-
Public Works Department
Work Plan / Initiatives
Capital Improvement Projects
• Annual City Street Reconstruction / Rehabilitation
• Annual Retaining Wall Replacement
• Upgrade and expansion of the SCADA system
• Inflow/ Infiltration Study— come into compliance with the MCES
• Sanitary Lift Station Reconstruction
• Annual Crack Seal and Seal Coat Program
Surface Water Management
• Annual Review of Surface Water Management Plan to insure compliance with
administrative and maintenance requirements
• Annual Review of NPDES lI permit and insure compliance
• Annual Review of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and insure compliance
• Review State and Federal laws and permit changes to insure City Policy and Ordinances
are current
• Review development plans to insure compliance with permit requirements
• Annual Review of MCWD Rule Changes
Parks
• Annual update inventory of park structure maintenance needs
• Evaluate equipment for possible replacement
• Research funding sources for park improvements
Streets
• Sweep City a minimum of two times per year
• Installation of new street signs throughout City and in Street Reconstruction Project Area.
• Decrease use of sand with new snowplowing and sanding equipment
• Repair sidewalks and trails as needed
• Include utility upgrades and repairs on annual street reconstruction project
Storm Sewer
• Continue annual lake outfall cleaning and dredging
• Continue annual catch basin cleaning
• Maintain stormwater storage / ponding areas
• Work with MCWD on storm water quality improvements
• Construct storm sewer improvements / repairs as needed
• Include upgrades and repairs on annual street reconstruction project
-123-
Sanitary Sewer
• Continue televising and performing annual repairs as needed
• In -pipe lining at locations with high inflow / infiltration problems
• Reduce I / I as much as possible to avoid MCES surcharge
• Annually implement SCADA monitoring and control system
• Include upgrades and repairs on annual street reconstruction project
• Coordinate with MCES to eliminate metering discrepancies
• Upgrade /reconstruct lift stations
• Coordinate as needed with proposed development
Water
• Implement SCADA system on new facilities
• Annually update water system model with Bolton & Menk
• Coordinate as needed with proposed development
• Include reconstruction and repairs on annual street reconstruction project
• Comply with Wellhead Protection Plan in accordance with State and Federal Regulations
Administration
• Annually update capital improvement program
• Review Safety and Training needs of staff
• Annually update Vehicle Replacement Program
• Coordinate Public Works & Parks Maintenance Facility space needs
• Coordinate Public Works review of grading and utility plans for development
• Implement multi -year Crack Seal and Seal Coat Program
• Upgrade office filing system and record retention
• Annually update inventory of City's infrastructure and mapping.
• Implement GIS street and utility mapping capabilities when completed by consultant.
-124-
10
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation; provides at a reasonable
cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community.
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 22, 2014 - 7:00 PM
REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call
vote There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
Page
1. Open meeting
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approve agenda, with any amendments
4. *Consent Agenda
*A. Approve payment of claims 732 -753
*B. Approve minutes: Apr 8, 2014 regular meeting 754 -760
Apr 15, 2014 special meeting workshop 761
*C. Approve the following permits for Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church
— The Blast: Sat, May 17, 2014, with fees paid
1. Public Dance /Live Music Permit 762
2. Banner and Sign Permit 763 -765
*D. Approve the following permits for the 2014 Mound Fire Relief Association 766 -767
Annual Fish Fry: June 7, 2014, with fees waived
1. Temporary Sign and Banner Permit 768A -768B
2. Public Dance /Live Music Permit 769
3. 1 -4 Day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License 770
*E. Approve Public Gathering Permit for Minnetonka Classic Bass Club Contest 771
at Surfside Beach and Park: Saturday, May 31, with fee and damage deposit
paid
*F. Parks & Open Space Commission recommendation on new playscape location 772
*G. Set Special Meeting Workshop for the purpose of receiving a Concept Plan
for Assisted Living Facility by Trident Development: May 20, 2014, 7:00 PM
5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit
to 3 minutes per speaker)
o. Mayor Harms, requesting action on Resolution Proclaiming "WeCAB Week in Mound " - 773 -774
May 4 -10, 2014
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
7. Mayor Hanus, requesting action on a Resolution Authorizing a Feasibility Study for 775 -813
a Lake Minnetonka Scenic By -Way Concept
8. Dan Faulkner, consulting engineer with Bolton & Menk, requesting 814 -816
discussion/action on:
A. Resolution Rejecting Bid for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall 817
Improvement Project– Three Points Boulevard
B. Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Bid Documents for and Ordering 818
Advertisement for Bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall
Improvement Project – East Three Points Boulevard
C. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Bid Documents and Ordering 819
Advertisement for Bids for the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvement
Project, Lost Lake Bridge to Wilshire Boulevard
D. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Bid Documents and Ordering — 820 821`
Advertisement for Bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall
Improvement Project – West Three Points Boulevard Utility Improvements
E. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Bid Documents and Ordering — 924820 - <'
Advertisement for Bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall
Improvement Project– West Three Points Boulevard Street and Retaining Wall
Improvements
9. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting action on Resolution 822 -825
Denying Board of Appeals Zoning Adjustment and Appeals Request from Allison
Sisk Regarding the Keeping of Alpacas at 6221 Westedge Boulevard
10. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussion/action 826 -832
on the Urban Agriculture Study Related to the Keeping of Chickens
11. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussion/action 833 -846
authorizing Submittal of comment letter to the Metropolitan Council regarding
the Thrive MMSP 2040 Draft Local Forecasts for the City of Mound
12. Information/Miscellaneous
A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager
B. Minutes
C. Reports: MCWD 2013 Year in Review (See separate brochure)
Harbor Wine & Spirits – March 2014 847
D. Correspondence: Resignation of Todd Peterson from Parks & Open 848
Space Commission
13. Adjourn
Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More
^urrent meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site. anew. cityofrnozrnd. com.
r �� • �r
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
7. Mayor Harms, requesting action on a Resolution Authorizing a Feasibility Study for 775 -813
a Lake Minnetonka Scenic By -Way Concept
8. Dan Faulkner, consulting engineer with Bolton & Menk, requesting 814 -816
discussion/action on:
A. Resolution Rejecting Bid for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall 817
Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard
B. Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Bid Documents for and Ordering 818
Advertisement for Bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall
Improvement Project — East Three Points Boulevard
C. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Bid Documents and Ordering 819
Advertisement for Bids for the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvement
Project, Lost Lake Bridge to Wilshire Boulevard
D. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Bid Documents and Ordering 820
Advertisement for Bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall
Improvement Project — West Three Points Boulevard Utility Improvements
E. Resolution Ordering Preparation of Bid Documents and Ordering 821
Advertisement for Bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall
Improvement Project — West Three Points Boulevard and Retaining Wall
Improvements
9. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting action on Resolution 822 -825
Denying Board of Appeals Zoning Adjustment and Appeals Request from Allison
Sisk Regarding the Keeping of Alpacas at 6221 Westedge Boulevard
10. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussion/action 826 -832
on the Urban Agriculture Study Related to the Keeping of Chickens
11. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussion/action 833 -846
authorizing Submittal of comment letter to the Metropolitan Council regarding
the Thrive MMSP 2040 Draft Local Forecasts for the City of Mound
12. Information/Miscellaneous
A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager
B. Minutes:
C. Reports: MCWD 2013 Year in Review (See separate brochure)
Harbor Wine & Spirits — March 2014 847
D. Correspondence: Resignation of Todd Peterson from Parks & Open 848
Space Commission
13. Adjourn
Note: This is apreliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More
,errent meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: wiviv. citLaf nound cona.
COUNCIL BRIEFING
April 22, 2014
Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!!
Apr 22 — 6:55 -- HRA regular meeting
Apr 22 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting — City Manager performance evaluation
Apr 24 —1:45 & 7:00pm — State Wide Tornado Drill
May 5 — Seasonal Hours begin
Mar 1 — 1:00 — Special HRA/CC meeting
May 7 — 5:00 — 7:00 — Hennepin County Assessors Open Book Meeting
May 10 — 8:00 -3:00 -- Recycling Day
May 13 — 6:55 -- HRA regular meeting
May 13 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting
May 17 — Mound Farmers' Market & More begins
May 17 — Wheels for Meals — bike ride benefiting Meals on Wheels
May 27 — 6:55 -- HRA regular meeting
May 27 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting
June 7 — 3:00 -12:00 — Mound Fire Department Fish Fry and Dance
June 10 — 6:55 -- HRA regular meeting
June 10 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting
June 24 — 6:55 -- HRA regular meeting
June 24 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting
July 17 — 19 -- Spirit of the Lakes Festival (July 20- raindate for fireworks)
Aug 2 — Tour de Tonka
Aug 12 — Primary Election
dug 12 — 8:00 -- HRA regular meeting — note change in time
Aug 12 — after HRA — CC regular meeting
Aug 26 — HRA regular meeting
Aug 26 — CC regular meeting
Oct 11 — Mound Farmers' Market & More Finale'
Nov 2 — Daylight Saving Time ends
Nov 12 — 6:30 -- HRA regular meeting — note change in day
Nov 12 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting
Nov 20 — 6:00 — Tree Lighting Ceremony
City Hall Closings
May 26 Memorial Day
July 4 Independence Day
Sept 1 Labor Day
City Official's Absences
May 14 -16 Kandis H conference
2014 04 i 1 1f
2014
042214H WS
$
107,559.22
2014
041714CTYAN
$
260.00
',TOTAL CLAIMS 2
-732-
Payments
Cj t Y OF MOUND
Current Period: April 2014
Batch Name BOLTMNK31414 User DollarAmt $107,175.00
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $107,175.00
$0.00 In Balance
Refer i BOLTONAND MENX, INCORPORA
Cash Payment
E 402 - 43120 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0165251
3/31/2014
Cash Payment
E 401- 43101 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0165255
3/31/2014
Cash Payment
E 401 - 43127 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0165256
3/31/2014
Cash Payment
E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0165257
3/31/2014
Cash Payment
E 401 -43112 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0165258
3/31/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0165251
3/31/2014
Cash Payment
E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0165251
3/31/2014
Cash Payment
E 401- 43113 -303 Engineering Fees
Invoice 0165261
3/31/2014
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0165263
3/31/2014
Cash Payment
E 60249450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0165262
3/31/2014
Cash Payment
E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0165273
3/31/2014
Cash Payment
E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs
MSA SYSTEM COORDINATION & UPDATE
SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014
2011 SW ISLAND STREET PROD PW11 -01
ENGINEER SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014
Project PW1101
2011 HIGHLANDS STREET PROJ PW11 -02
ENGINEER SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014
Project PW 1102
SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU
MARCH 14 2014
2012 NORTH ISLAND STREET PROJ. PW 12-
01 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU MARCH 14
2014
Project PW 1201
GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS THRU
MARCH 142014
WATER ENGINEERING SVCS THRU MARCH
142014
2013 CRACK & SEAL COAT PROD PW 13 -06
ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014
Project PW1301
2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW13-
03 ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014
Project PW 1303
2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW13-
06 ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014
Project PW 1306
WATER SYSTEM MODELING ENG SVCS
THRU MARCH 14 2014
STORMWATER UTILITY -SWPPP UPDATE
ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014
Invoice 0165253 3/31/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23296 FRIEDRICHSON- FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD RD SKETCH PLAN REVIEW ENG
SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014
Invoice 0165252
3131/2014
Cash Payment
E 401- 43114 -303 Engineering Fees
Invoice 0165265
3/3112014
Cash Payment
E 675 - 49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0165264
3/31/2014
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0165266
3/31/2014
2014 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW14-
01 ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014
Project PW 1401
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROV 2014 PROJ
PW14 -04 ENG SVCS THRU MARCH 14 2014
Project PW1404
2014 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 14 -03
ENG SVC THRU MARCH 14 2014
-733- Project PW1403
04/17114 9:35 AM
Page 1
$288.00
$1,067.50
$90.00
$504.00
$680.00
$2,728.50
$32.50
$31,932.50
$1,046.00
$147.00
$72.00
$252.00
$360.00
$53,992.00
$288.00
$5,492.00
Pre- Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $107,175.00
Total $107,175.00
734-
CITY of MOUND
04/17/14 9:35 AM
_
i
Payments
Page 2
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: April 2014
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2014 BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN
$8,203.00
REPLACE PROJ PW 14 -08 ENG SVC THRU
MARCH 142014
Invoice 0165267 3/31/2014
Project PW1408
Transaction Date 4/14/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$107,175.00
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$3,088.50
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
$87,762.00
402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT
$288.00
601 WATER FUND
$8,307.50
602 SEWER FUND
$6,685.00
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
$1,044.00
$107,175.00
Pre- Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $107,175.00
Total $107,175.00
734-
CITY OF MOUND
04/17/1411:32 AM
- -'-'�•
Page 1
' Payments
C TY OF MOUND
Current Period: April 2014
Batch Name 042214CITY User Dollar Amt $201,732.00
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $201,732.00
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 42 ALERT -ALL CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -217 Fire Prevention Supplies JR FIREFIGHTER STICK ON BADGES W/
$165.00
MOUND FIRE DEPT IMPRINT
Invoice 214030164 3/31/2014 PO 24296
Transaction Date 4117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
.... _ ... ,..:..
$165.00
,....
Refer 1 ASPENEQUIPMENT
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts FREIGHT BALANCE DUE ON EQUIPMENT
$22.36
Invoice 10130041 -2 3/5/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$22.36
Refer 32 BARTLEY SALES COMPANY, INCO _
Cash Payment E 60949750 -210 Operating Supplies ENTRANCE MAT- HWS
$614.53
Invoice 106263 4/8/2014
Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$614.53
Refer 2 BENIEK PROPERTY SVCS INC.
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #1 CBD MARCH 2014 PLOWING
$280.00
Invoice 142611 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #2 TRUE VALUE -RAMP- SIDEWALKS
$305.00
MARCH 2014 PLOWING& SHOVELING
Invoice 142611 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #3 COMMERCE BLVD MARCH 2014
$0.00
PLOWING
Invoice 142611 3/31/2014
Transaction Date 2/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$585.00
27 BILL RASCHER MECHANICAL INC. _
_Refer
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance 5005 EDGEWATER, FROZEN WATER MAIN
$816,18
REPAIR
Invoice 3762 2/18/2014
Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$816.18
Refer 35 BOYER FORD TRUCKS _
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts FUEL PUMP, GASKET COVER, WASHER
$105.85
SEAL -PARKS
Invoice 122379 3/25/2014
Transaction Date 4/14/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$105.85
Refer 34 BOYER TRUCKPARTS _
Cash Payment E602-49450 -221 Equipment Parts SEAL ASSEMBLY TRUCK #105
$22.49
Invoice 841175 4/8/2014
Transaction Date 4/14/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$22.49
Refer 43 CARBONE S PIZZA _
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260431 Meeting Expense BLUECARD TRAINING LUNCH FIRE DEPT
$61.40
Invoice 04222014 4/6/2014
Transaction Date 4/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$61.40
Refer 44 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS (FIRE) _
-735-
CITY OF MOUND
04/17/1411: 32 AM
Page 2
Payments
C "TY OF MOUND
Current Period: April 2014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair
SPARK PLUG, PLATINUM PLUGS, SM
$76.85
ENGINE PART, FUEL FILTERS
Invoice 6974 - 223872 4/12/2014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair GEAR OIL
$13.77
Invoice 6974 - 223875 4/12/2014
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair
CREDIT- RETURN SM ENGINE PART
- $10.79
Invoice 6974 - 223874 4/12/2014
Transaction Date 4/17/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$79.83
Refer 33 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/IM
_
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts
SWAY BAR LINK -'07 DODGE DAKOTA #107
$23.78
Invoice 6974 - 222501 3/19/2014
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts
OIL FILTERS #202
$9.52
Invoice 6974 - 222501 3/19/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -230 Shop Materials
STARTING FLUID- SHOP
$2.75
Invoice 6974 - 222685 3/24/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
AIR, FUEL & OIL FILTERS- ELGIN SWEEPER
$8161
Invoice 6974 - 222966 3128/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials
ABSORBENT MEDIUM 25 LB
$34.92
Invoice 6974 - 223125 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
AUTO BATTERY #206
$86.99
'. Invoice 6974 - 223493 4/712014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts
FILTER KITS, MERCON SP ATF OTS
$119.00
Invoice 6974- 223493 4/7/2014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -221 Equipment Parts
DIESEL CLEANER, WHEEL NUTS, TECHRON
$56.89
20 OZ
Invoice 6974- 223503 4M2014
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
BATTERY HOLD- DOWNS, BELT
$9.28
Invoice 6974- 223518 4/7/2014
Transaction Date 4/1412013
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$425.74
Refer 3 CENTERPOINT ENERGY(MINNEG
Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14
$1,305.04
Invoice 04222014 4/9/2014
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14
$1,305.03
Invoice 04222014 4/9/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14
$1,211.47
Invoice 04222014 4/9/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14
$1,430.50
Invoice 04222014 4/9/2014
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14
$2,758.59
Invoice 04222014 4/9/2014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14
$671.32
Invoice 04222014 4/9/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 2 -19 -14 TO 3 -20 -14 DEPOT BLDG
$342.56
Invoice 04222014 4/912014
Transaction Date 3/18/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$9,024.51
r Refer 49 D VINCIS NAVARRE, 1NCORPORAT
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -431 Meeting Expense
BLUE CARD TRAINING LUNCH MTG FIRE
$70.62
DEPT 4 -3 -14
Invoice 417882 4/3/2014
-736-
Payments
MY 5 Off' MOUND
04/17/14 11:32 AM
Page 3
Invoice 04222014 4/16/2014
Transaction Date 4/17/2014
Refer 7 FULLERTON BUILDING CENTER
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice 2183962 3/3/2014
Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -400 Repairs & Maintenance
Invoice 2183962 3/312014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Refer 9 G & K SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006233171 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006233171 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006233171 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 1006233171 3131/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006244542 4/712014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006244542 4/7/2014
Cash Payment E 602-49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006244542 41712014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 1006244542 4/7/2014
Transaction Date 4/14/2013
Refer 8 G & K SERVICES _
Wells Fargo 10100
PARKS- CEDAR LUMBER 1 X 4,4 X 6
DOCK REPAIRS- CEDAR LUMBER 1 X 4
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $49.95
$226.30
$58.20
Total $284.50
UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 $25.21
UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 $25.65
UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 $38.18
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -31 -14 $178.38
Project 14 -3
UNIFORM SVC 4 -7 -14 $25.21
UNIFORM SVC 4 -7 -14 $25.65
UNIFORM SVC 4 -7 -14 $36.84
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -7 -14 $202.76
Project 14 -3
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $557.88
737
Current Period: April 2014
Transaction Date
4/1712014
Wells Fargo 1.0100 Total
$70.62
Refer
36 DELANO RENTAL INCORPORATED_
CasR Payment
E 101- 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL)
TOWABLE 48" AERATOR
$115.10
Invoice 3518
4/11/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL)
TOWABLE 48" AERATOR
$115.10
Invoice 3518
4/11/2014
Transaction Date
4114/2013
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$230.20
Refer
4 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS _
Cash Payment
E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials
9- 5 GAL YELLOW TRAFFIC PAINT, 23 5
$2,795.35
GALS WHITE HIGH BUILD DURABLE, 9 BAGS
GLASS BEAD
Invoice 802151309 3/17/2014
Transaction Date
4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$2,795.35
Refer
5 EXECUTIVE TITLE INC.- GV _
Cash Payment
R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu
REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT -5075
$611.61
WINDSOR RD- R. EMMER
Invoice 04222014 4/1012014
Transaction Date
4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$611.61
Refer 45 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE _
Cash Payment
E 222- 42260 -433 Dues and Subscriptions
FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE 2 YR 2014 & 2015
$49.95
SUBSCRIPTION
Invoice 04222014 4/16/2014
Transaction Date 4/17/2014
Refer 7 FULLERTON BUILDING CENTER
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice 2183962 3/3/2014
Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -400 Repairs & Maintenance
Invoice 2183962 3/312014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Refer 9 G & K SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006233171 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006233171 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006233171 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 1006233171 3131/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006244542 4/712014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006244542 4/7/2014
Cash Payment E 602-49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006244542 41712014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 1006244542 4/7/2014
Transaction Date 4/14/2013
Refer 8 G & K SERVICES _
Wells Fargo 10100
PARKS- CEDAR LUMBER 1 X 4,4 X 6
DOCK REPAIRS- CEDAR LUMBER 1 X 4
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $49.95
$226.30
$58.20
Total $284.50
UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 $25.21
UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 $25.65
UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 $38.18
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -31 -14 $178.38
Project 14 -3
UNIFORM SVC 4 -7 -14 $25.21
UNIFORM SVC 4 -7 -14 $25.65
UNIFORM SVC 4 -7 -14 $36.84
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -7 -14 $202.76
Project 14 -3
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $557.88
737
CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:32 AM
Page 4
Payments
CITY OF MOUN[D
Current Period: April 2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -460 Janitorial Services
MAT SVC 3 -31 -14 CENT BLDG
$55.74
Invoice 1006233172 3/31/2014
Refer 11 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP I
Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -460 Janitorial Services
MAT SVC 4 -14 -14 CITY HALL
$58.94
Invoice 1006255836 4/14/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23291 BOYUM- 2544COMMERCE -P 2544 COMMERCE CUP PLANNING SVCS
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SVC 3 -31 -14 PARKS
$47.67
Invoice 1006233173 3/31/2014
5913 FAIRFIELD RD SUBDIVISION PLANNING
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -31 -14 PARKS
$75.02
Invoice 1006233173 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services
MAT SVC 4 -07 -14 LIQUOR STORE
$69.98
Invoice 1006244535 417/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SVC 4 -07 -14 PARKS
$42.53
Invoice 1006244543 4/7/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -7 -14 PARKS
$65.27
Invoice 1006244543 4/7/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -460 Janitorial Services
MAT SVC 4 -14 -14 LIQUOR STORE
$69.98
Invoice 1006255829 4/1412014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -460 Janitorial Services
MAT SVC 4 -14 -14
$94.35
Invoice 1006255835 4/14/2014
Transaction Date 4/14/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$579.48
Refer 10 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP
hth. Cash Payment E101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 97261 3131/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 97164 3/3/2014
Transaction Date 4/14/2014
Refer 47 HENNEPINCOUNTYINFORMATIO
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -418 Other Rentals
Invoice 1000043845 4/11/2014
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -418 Other Rentals
3/4" PLATE WITH HOLES $40.00
1/8 X 3" FLAT 10' $10.85
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
PW RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE -
MARCH 2014
Project 14 -3
FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE &
ADMINISTRATION FEE - MARCH 2014
Invoice 1000043736 4/10/2014
Transaction Date 3/612014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 11 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP I
Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -300 Professional Srvs
MISC PLANNING SVCS MARCH 2014
Invoice 007 - 001 -71 4/9/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23291 BOYUM- 2544COMMERCE -P 2544 COMMERCE CUP PLANNING SVCS
MARCH 2014
Invoice 007- 005 -67 4/9/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23287 FRIEDRICHSEN5913FAIRFI
5913 FAIRFIELD RD SUBDIVISION PLANNING
SVCS MARCH 2014
Invoice 007- 005 -67 4/9/2014
Transaction Date 4/1512014
Refer 13 INFRATECH
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice 1400098 3/24/2014
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice PR140164 2/28/2014
$50.85
$127.20
$1,285.26
$1,412.46
$1,099.75
$41.50
$41.50
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,182.75
YELLOW TRACTOR CONNECTOR CABLE $110.00
2013 STREET IMPROV PROJ CURED IN $30,952.50
PLACE PIPE REPAIRS PW 13 -06
_738_ Project PW1306
CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:32 AM
- -- Page 5
Payments
Refer 12 ISTATE TRUCK CENTER
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
Current Period: April 2014
Invoice C242297668 3125/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
2013 STREET IMPROV PROJ CURED IN
$36,342.50
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts
PLACE PIPE REPAIRS PW 13 -06
Invoice C242297668 3/25/2014
Invoice 1400098
3/24/2014
Project PW1306
Refer 14 KLM ENGINEERING, INCORPORAT
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -400 Repairs & Maintenance
JET VAC CLEAN SANITARY SEWER 3 -27 -14
$1,012.50
Invoice PR140190 3/27/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
CONNECTOR CABLES
$350.10
Invoice 1400110
3/26/2014
Transaction Date
4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$68,767.60
Refer 12 ISTATE TRUCK CENTER
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
CASE ASSY MIRR CVX #313
Invoice C242297668 3125/2014
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts
CASE ASSY MIRR CVX #313
Invoice 0242297668 3/25/2014
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts
CASE ASSY MIRR CVX #313
Invoice C242297668 3/25/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 14 KLM ENGINEERING, INCORPORAT
Cash Payment G 101 -23283 VERIZON WIRELESS -TOW
VERIZON ANTENNA MODIFICATION -
CHATEAU TOWER #3
$89.65
$11.21
$11.21
Total $112.07
$1,500.00
Invoice 5153 3/28/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23283 VERIZON WIRELESS -TOW VERIZON ANTENNA MODIFICATION -
HERCULES TOWER #8
Invoice 5154 3/28/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 17 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T _
Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -361 General Liability Ins 2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 46297 412/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -361 General Liability Ins
Invoice 46297 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -361 General Liability Ins
Invoice 46297 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -361 General Liability Ins
Invoice 46297 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -361 General Liability Ins
Invoice 46297 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -361 General Liability Ins
Invoice 46297 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -361 General Liability Ins
Invoice 46297 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -361 General Liability Ins
Invoice 46297 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -361 General Liability Ins
Invoice 46297 4/2/2014
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
14 THRP 1 "
-739-
$1,500.00
$3,000.00
$2,139.30
$285.24
$770.15
$142.62
$313.77
$1,426.20
$85.57
$741.62
$4,706.46
Invoice 27152
Lefty OF MOUND
04/17/1411:32 AM
Cash Payment
E 101 -45200 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$3,063.77
Page 6
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Payments
412/2014
i
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$6,911.15
CITY
OF MOUND
Invoice 27152
4/2/2014
Current Period: April 2014
Cash Payment
E 281 -45210 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$397.89
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Cash Payment
E 101 -45200 -361 General Liability Ins
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$1,055.39
Cash Payment
E 601 - 49400 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 46297
4/2/2014
Invoice 27152
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -361 General Liability Ins
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$5,704.81
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
Invoice 46297
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
Cash Payment
E 281 - 45210 -361 General Liability Ins
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$487.48
Invoice 27152
412/2014
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Cash Payment
Invoice 46297
4/212014
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Cash Payment
E 285- 46388 -361 General Liability Ins
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$41.65
-740-
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 46297
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 601- 49400 -361 General Liability Ins
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$4,763.51
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 46297
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -361 General Liability Ins
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$4,421.22
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 46297
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -361 General Liability Ins
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$7,058.56
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 46297
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41930 -361 General Liability Ins
2ND INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$1,426.20
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
' Invoice 46297
4/2/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$35,569.75
Refer
16 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE
T _
Cash Payment
E 101 - 42400 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc
2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$621.71
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$7,211.80
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -45200 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$3,063.77
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
412/2014
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$6,911.15
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 281 -45210 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$397.89
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 601 - 49400 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$3,485.04
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$7,211.80
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$2,287.88
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
412/2014
Cash Payment
E 675 - 49425 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$65.65
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
4/2/2014
-740-
CITY OF MOUND
04/17/1411:32 AM
_.._- _._.�..\
Page 7
Payments
Current Period: April 2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -41110 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc
2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$1168
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 41310 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc
2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$621.71
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
4/212014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41500 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc
2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$746.05
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 42110 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc
2ND INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$497.37
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27152
4/2/2014
Transaction Date 4115/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$33,135.50
Refer
15 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES _
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -434 Conference & Training
2014 SAFETY & LOSS CONTROL WKSHP 4-
$20.00
16 -14
Invoice 198640
4/8/2014
Project 14 -4
Transaction Date
4/1 512 01 4
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$20.00
Refer
18 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR -
Cash Payment
E 101 -41930 -202 Duplicating and copying
COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - COLOR
$139.53
OVERAGE - 3/14/14 TO 4/13/14
Invoice 1729418
4/3/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 41930 -202 Duplicating and copying
COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - BAN
$110.37
OVERAGE - 3/14114 TO 4/13/14
Invoice 1729418
4/3/2014
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -202 Duplicating and copying
KONICA MINOLTA 8200 PIN COPIER
$9.28
OVERAGE CHG 3 -10 -14 TO 4 -9 -14
Invoice 1727734
4/1/2014
Project 14 -3
Transaction Date
4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$259.18
6 MCVAY DEBRA _
_Refer
Cash Payment
R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu
REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT -2026
$194.25
BELAIRE LN- D. MCVAY
Invoice 04222014 4/10/2014
Transaction Date
4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$194.25
Refer 19
MEDIACOM _
Cash Payment
E 101- 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells
ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 4 -16 -14 THRU 5-
$93.40
15 -14
Invoice 04222014
4/6/2014
Transaction Date
4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$93.40
Refer 48 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES COMP _
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair
GAS MONITOR REPAIRS- REPLACE SENSOR
$375.00
Invoice 97381414
4/7/2014 PO 24298
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair
GAS MONITOR REPAIRS- REPLACE SENSOR
$375.00
Invoice 97381415
4/7/2014 PO 24298
Transaction Date
4/17/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$750.00
Refer 21
MINNESOTA DEPT PUBLIC SAFET _
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -210 Operating Supplies
2014 MANDATORY VEHICLE INSPECTION
$32.00
PROGRAM DECALS
Invoice 04222014
4/7/2014
-741-
CITY OF MOUND
04/17/1411:32 AM
----
Page 8
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: April 2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$32.00
Refer 20 MINNESOTA UNEMPLOYMENT INS_
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -140 Unemployment Comp
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 1ST QTR
$510.48
2014 K. EZAKI
Invoice 04222014 4/812014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -140 Unemployment Comp
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 1ST QTR
$13.12
2014 A. HAGEN
Invoice 04222014 4/8/2014
Cash Payment E 60249450 -140 Unemployment Comp
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 1ST QTR
$292.80
2014 E. STRICKLAND
Invoice 04222014 4/812014
Project 14 -3
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$816.40
Refer 40 MINNESOTA WASTEWATER OPER_
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training
MWOA ANNUAL CONFERENCE- JULY 22 -25
$225.00
GRAND RAPIDS- R. HANSON
Invoice 04222014 4/16/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training
MWOA ANNUAL CONFERENCE- JULY 22 -25
$225.00
GRAND RAPIDS- S. KIVISTO
Invoice 04222014 4/1612014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training
MWOA ANNUAL CONFERENCE- JULY 22 -25
$225.00
GRAND RAPIDS- L. GIESE
'? Invoice 04222014 4/16/2014
Transaction Date 4/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$675.00
Refer 22 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOC /A TIO _
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib
APRIL 2014 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION
$12,250.00
CONTRIBUTION
Invoice 04222014 4/1/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$12,250.00
Refer 23 NS /l MECHANICAL CONTRACTING, _
Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -400 Repairs & Maintenance
REPLACE PILOT ASSEMBLY ON LEFT 31
$620.55
BOILER- CENT BLDG 3 -24 -14
Invoice W31221 4/10/2014
Transaction Date 1/912014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$620.55
Refer 24 0 SULLIVANS HOLIDAY
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -212 Motor Fuels
FUEL STREET DEPT- TRUCK #202
$348.05
Invoice 03062014 3/6/2014
Cash Payment E101- 43100 -212 Motor Fuels
FUEL STREET DEPT- TRUCK #202
$340,02
Invoice 03212014 3/21/2014
Cash Payment E 60149400 -212 Motor Fuels
FUEL WATER DEPT- TRUCK #202
$410.00
Invoice 03272014 3/27/2014
Transaction Date 4/1512014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,098.07
Refer 25 OFFICE DEPOT _
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -200 Office Supplies
50 PK DVD +R DISCS
$8.63
Invoice 702885385001 3/28/2014 PO 24395
Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -200 Office Supplies
COPY PAPER -CITY HALL
$139.36
Invoice 702885385001 3/28/2014 PO 24395
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$147.99
Refer 42 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUT IONS _
-742-
ellt�y OF Nq-O ND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: April 2014
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -322 Postage MARCH 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE
Invoice 140329 4/11/2014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute MARCH 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING,
PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT
Invoice 140329 4111/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute MARCH 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING,
PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT
Invoice 140329
4/11/2014
Cash Payment
E 601- 49400 -322 Postage
Invoice 140329
4/1112014
Transaction Date
2/19/2014
Refer 41
ORONO, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -450 Board of Prisoners
MARCH 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE
04/17114 11:32 AM
Page 9
$322.73
$1,773.63
$1,773.63
$322.74
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,192.73
HENNEP CTY JAIL CHARGES- PER DIEM $945.51
FEES MARCH 2014
Invoice 20140060 4/14/2014
Transaction Date 4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $945.51
Refer 26 SIMPLEX GRINNELL
Cash Payment E 285- 46388 -440 Other Contractual Servic PARKING DECK FIRE EXTINGUISHER, $830.55
SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST &
INSPECTION 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15
Invoice 76889331 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 10145200 -440 Other Contractual Servic
PARKS GARAGE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS
TEST & INSPECT 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15
Invoice 76889091 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -440 Other Contractual Servic
CITY HALL FIRE EXTINGUISHER,
SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST &
INSPECTION 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15
Invoice 76888878 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic
FIRE DEPT FIRE EXTINGUISHER,
SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM, KITCHEN HOOD
TEST & INSPECTION 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15
Invoice 76888878 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic
HWS FIRE EXTINGUISHER, SPRINKLER &
FIRE ALARM TEST & INSPECTION 5 -1 -14
THRU 4 -30 -15
Invoice 76888955 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41910440 Other Contractual Servic
CENTENNIAL BLDG FIRE EXTINGUISHER,
SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST &
INSPECTION 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15
Invoice 76888952 313112014
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic PUB WKS BLDG FIRE EXTINGUISHER,
SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST &
INSPECTION 5 -1 -14 THRU 4 -30 -15
Invoice 76888988 3/31/2014 Project 14 -3
Transaction Date 4/14/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 28 STA -SAFE LOCKSMITHS COMPAN _
Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance 2 CITY HALL DOORS REKEYED- 1 MORTICE
CYLINDER KEYWAY, SIMPLEX TAILPIECE
ASSEMBLY
Invoice 00019808
Transaction Date
Refer 3
3/3/2014
$80.00
$1,036.38
$1,036.37
$719.46
$1,187.65
$846.55
$5,736.96
$178.60
4/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $178.60
URTLE MAC AND KEY PRINTING _ .743-
-744-
CITY OF MOUND
04/17/1411:32 AM
Page 10
' Payments
CffY
OF PAC7UND
Current Period: April 2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 41910 -200 Office Supplies
5,000 #10 IMPRINTED ENVELOPES
$345.00
Invoice 20524
4/15/2014 PO 23935
Transaction Date 4116/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$345.00
Refer
46 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR COMP
_
Cash Payment
E 222 -42260 -402 Building Maintenance
ADJ CLUTCH & LUBRICATE MAINT BAY
$125.00
WEST GARAGE DOOR
Invoice 413070
4/2/2014
Transaction Date
4/17/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$125.00
Refer
29 UHL COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 101- 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance
SVC HEATING SYSTEM- VAV'S PROGRAM
$1,634.15
ISSUES -CITY HALL & POLICE BOOKING
ROOM 4 -04 -14
Invoice 26333
4/4/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance
PREV MTCE 2ND QTR 2014 HEATING
$531.25
SYSTEM - CITY HALL
Invoice 26441
4/112014
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -402 Building Maintenance
PREV MTCE HEATING SYSTEM- 2ND QTR
$531.25
2014- FIRE DEPT
Invoice 26441
4/112014
Transaction Date 4/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$2,696.65
a. Refer
37 UNIQUE PAVING MATERIALS COR _
Cash Payment
E 101 -43100 -224 Street Maint Materials
#2 WINTER COLD MIX 3.10 TONS
$387.50
Invoice 234578
3/26/2014
Transaction Date 4/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$387.50
Refer
30 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE_
Cash Payment
E601-49400-400 Repairs & Maintenance
LEAK LOCATE 3 -22 -14 @ 5233 BARTLETT
$384.72
BLVD
Invoice 4967
4/2/2014
Transaction Date 4/1612014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$384.72
Refer
38 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC _
Cash Payment
E 601- 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance
REPAIR WATER SVC LEAK @ 5928
$2,162.50
HILLCREST 3 -26 -14
Invoice 3708
4/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 601 - 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance
REPAIR CURB STOP @ 2443 COMMERCE
$1.,946.25
BLVD 3 -31 -14
Invoice 3711
4/11/2014
Transaction Date 4/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$4,108.75
Refer
31 XCEL ENERGY _
Cash Payment
E 101 -43100 -381 Electric Utilities
5341 MAYWOOD RD STREET LIGHTS -3 -3 TO
$5,217.17
4 -2 -14
Invoice 515517516 4/3/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities
CARLOW RD LIFT STATION ELECTRIC SVC
$123.11
2 -26 THRU 3 -29 -14
Invoice 0514953980
4/3/2014
Transaction Date 4/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,340.28
-744-
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
285 MOUND HRA
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: April 2014
10100 Wells Fargo
$52,505.79
$30,420.02
$943.57
$872.20
$16,932.94
$87,976.52
$12,015.31
$65.65
$201,732.00
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $201,732.00
Total $201,732.00
-745-
04/17/14 11:32 AM
Page 11
' a
Batch Name 042214HWS
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: April 2014
User Dollar Amt $107,559.22
Computer DollarAmt $107,559.22
$0.00 In Balance
04117/14 11:14 AM
Page 1
Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE _
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 125627
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$95.40
Invoice 463410510 4/15/2014
4/9/2014
Cash Payment
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
FREIGHT
$1.00
Invoice 463410510 4/15/2014
Transaction Date 4/1512014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$96.40
Refer 2 BELLBOY CORPORATION _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
BAGS, SUPPLIES
$91.85
Invoice 89987900 41412014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
$31.50
Invoice 89987900 4/4/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
MERCHANDISE- CORKSCREWS
$9.04
Invoice 89987900 4/412014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
$58.00
Invoice 89991500 419/2014
Cash Payment E609-49750-210 Operating Supplies
BAGS, SUPPLIES
$161.65
Invoice 90026300 4/14/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
MERCHANDISE, CORCKSCREW, WAITER,
$75.99
GIFT BAGS
Invoice 90026300 4/14/2014
Transaction Date 4/1512014
Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 42478000 4/412014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
Invoice 42478000 4/4/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 42496600 4/9/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
Invoice 42496600 4/9/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 42590600 4/1412014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Refer 4 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $428.03
LIQUOR
FREIGHT
LIQUOR
FREIGHT
LIQUOR
Wells Fargo 10100
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 125627
4/9/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 125627
4/9/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 123988
4/212014
$2,896.85
$40.30
$4,531.59
$54.25
$8,309.15
Total $15,832.14
$63.85
$312.18
$619.15
Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $995.18
Refer 5 CHANKASKA CREEK TASTING RO _
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $151.20
Invoice 65225 4/8/2014
-746-
CITY OF MOUND
04/17/1411:14 AM
-- ------
Page 2
Payments
CITY CAF` M,0UND
Current Period: April 2014
Transaction Date 4/16/2014
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $151.20
Refer
6 COCA COLA BOTTLING- MIDWEST _
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX
$266.16
Invoice 0138120906 4/3/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX
$237.60
Invoice 0168051405
4/17/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $523.76
Refer
7 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$260.00
Invoice 19218
4/7/2014
Transaction Date
4/15/2014
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $260.00
Refer
8 DAYDISTRIBUTING COMPANY _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$0.00
Invoice 747810
4/15/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$160.10
Invoice 747809
4/15/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,837.31
Invoice 000346
4/15/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$177.65
Invoice 747064
4/9/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,586.60
Invoice 746754
4/8/2014
Transaction Date
4/15/2014
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $6,761.66
Refer
9 EXCELSIOR BREWING COMPANY _
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$150.00
Invoice 3472
4/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
GLASSWARE
$48.00
Invoice 3510
4/9/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$120.00
Invoice 3548
4/16/2014
Transaction Date
4/1512014
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $318.00
Refer
10 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$1,149.00
Invoice 696447
4/9/2014
Transaction Date
4/15/2014
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $1,149.00
11 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _
_Refer
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,129.30
Invoice 2199926
4/14/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$38.80
Invoice 2199928
4/14/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$15.50
Invoice 2199927
4/14/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,214.44
Invoice 2199879
4/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$16.00
Invoice 2199880
4/8/2014
Transaction Date
4/15/2014
Well s. Fa_747_
10100
Total $6,414.04
CITY OF MOUND 04/17/14 11:14 AM
_.._._..�\.\ Page 3
Payments
CITY OF M,OUND
Current Period: April 2014
Refer 12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 1823292 419/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 1823290
41912014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 1823291
4/9/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
Invoice 1817730
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 1817729
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 1817728
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 1823816
4/10/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
Invoice 614170
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 1828896
4/1612014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 1828897
4/16/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 1828895
4/16/2014
Transaction Date
4/1512014
Wells Fargo
Refer 13
MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY
_
$60.50
$1,543.73
$1,032.70
$26.65
$4,950.99
$3,192.59
$246.00
- $43.35
$2,304.95
$185.24
$4,310.85
10100 Total $17,810.85
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 3 -17 -14
Invoice 29178
3/17/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 3 -20 -14
Invoice 29194
3/20/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 3 -24 -14
Invoice 29203
3124/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 3 -27 -14
Invoice 29220
3/27/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 3 -31 -14
Invoice 29228
3/31/2014
$33.35
$272.95
$47.85
$195.65
$10.15
Transaction Date 4/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $559.95
Refer 14 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic
WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 3 -10 -14
$61.00
Invoice 928022556 3/3012014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$61.00
Refer _ 15 PARLEY LAKE WINERY
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$219.00
Invoice 14029 4/9/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$219.00
Refer 16 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE QOMPA _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$491.00
Invoice 8442986 4/2/2014
-748-
CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411 14 AM
- - -- Page 4
Payments
i "n€ E 4` CIE° Mi,?UNT,,
Current Period: April 2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$11.25
Invoice 8442986 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$57.00
Invoice 8443030 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2.25
Invoice 8443030 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
- $24.00
Invoice 8443336 4/4/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT CREDIT
-$1.25
Invoice 8443336 4/4/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$536.25
Refer 17 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA
_
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$501.16
Invoice 8443510 417/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$8.75
Invoice 8443510 4/7/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,176.70
Invoice 8444516 4/14/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$16.25
Invoice 8444516 4/14/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$1,702.86
19 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
_
_Refer
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$569.70
Invoice 2583076 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR.
$173.60
Invoice 2583075 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$5,207.46
Invoice 2590117 4/16/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$965.90
Invoice 2590118 4/16/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$6,916.66
Refer 18 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$540.25
Invoice 2586515 4/9/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$804.50
Invoice 2586516 419/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$1,344.75
Refer 20 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,286.00
Invoice 1147304 4/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$874.57
Invoice 1147303 4/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,244.00
Invoice 1149670 4/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$574.36
Invoice 1149671 4/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$993.85
Invoice 1151978 4/17/2014
_749_
CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:14 AM
Page 5
Payments
CITY OFIVIOUND
Current Period: April 2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,840.00
Invoice 1151977
4/17/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$6,812.78
Refer
28 SOVERE /GNESTATE WINE _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$437.16
Invoice 306
4/13/2014
Transaction Date 4/17/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$437.16
Refer
22 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$104.05
Invoice 816648
4/15/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$7,242.20
Invoice 816641
4/1512014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$949.25
Invoice 816397
4/11/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$312.00
Invoice 816655
4/11/2014
Transaction Date
4/1512014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$8,607.50
Refer
21 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$947.15
''.i. Invoice 814954
4/4/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$132.00
Invoice 815160
4/4/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$74.45
Invoice 00771789 4/7/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$6,342.85
Invoice 815220
4/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$104.05
Invoice 815221
4/8/2014
Transaction Date
4/1512014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$7,600.50
Refer 23 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$73.50
Invoice 0095878
4/312014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$4.00
Invoice 0095878
4/3/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$431.00
Invoice 0095877
4/3/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$8.00
Invoice 0095877
4/3/2014
Transaction Date
4/1512014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$516.50
Refer 29 WEBLEASE USA _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic
MONTHLY WEBSITE
SVC- HWS 4 -15 -14 TO 5-
$99.00
14 -14
Invoice 64799 4115/2014
Transaction Date 4/17/2014 Wells Fargo
Refer 24 WINE COMPANY N
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 357459 4/3/2014
-750-
10100 Total $99.00
$296.00
CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:14 AM
- - -- Page 6
Payments
CITY OF [0,01 IND
Current Period: April 2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$6.30
Invoice 357459 4/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
MERCH- MAGNUM
12PK
$59.40
Invoice 357460 4/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.65
Invoice 357460 4/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$392.00
Invoice 358055 4/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$825
Invoice 358055 4/10/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $763.60
25 WINE MERCHANTS _
_Refer
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$718.50
Invoice 497501 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,377.70
Invoice 498431 4/9/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
- $18.00
Invoice 64790 4/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,320.00
Invoice 499447 4/16/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $3,398.20
Refer 26 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,154.15
Invoice 1090203375 412/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$171.00
Invoice 1090203376 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$5,049.35
Invoice 1090206812 4/9/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$21.50
Invoice 1090206813 4/9/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$4,132.40
Invoice 1090210043 4115/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$462.00
Invoice 1090210044 4/15/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$110.10
Invoice 1090210045 4/15/2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $12,100.50
Refer 27 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$650.00
Invoice 1080165154 4/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$3,204.77
Invoice 1080165143 4/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$48.00
Invoice 1080165155 4/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$212.00
Invoice 1080167778 4/16/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,027.98
Invoice 1080167779 4/16/2014
-751-
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $107,559.22
Total $107,559.22
-752-
CITY OF MOUND 04/17/1411:14 AM
- --
Page 7
r....
\ \
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: April 2014
Transaction Date 4/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,14275
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$107,559.22
$107,559.22
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $107,559.22
Total $107,559.22
-752-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: April 2014
Batch Name 041714CTYMAN User DollarAmt $260.00
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $260.00
$0.00 In Balance
04/17/14 11:27 AM
Page i
Refer 2 FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC, HENNEPIN
_
Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow
HENNEPIN CTY SHERIFF'S
$20.00
COMMUNICATION DIVISION 2014 DUES- HC
FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC
Invoice 04172014 4/14/2014
Transaction Date 4/17/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
-
$20.00
Refer 1 MUNICI -PALS
Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -434 Conference & Training
SPRING WORKSHOP MAY 1 -J. NORLANDER
$60.00
Invoice 04172014 4/8/2014 PO 24396
Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -434 Conference & Training
SPRING WORKSHOP MAY 1 - C. ROBERTS
$60.00
Invoice 04172014 4/8/2014 PO 24396
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -434 Conference & Training
SPRING WORKSHOP MAY 1 -V. WEBER
$60.00
Invoice 04172014 4/8/2014 PO 24396
Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -434 Conference & Training
SPRING WORKSHOP MAY 2 - A. STARK
$60.00
Invoice 04172014 4/8/2014 PO 24396
_
Transaction Date 4/1712014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$240.00
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101GENERALFUND
$180.00
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
$80.00
$260.00
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $260.00
Total $260.00
-753-
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
April 8, 2014
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on
Tuesday, April 8, 2014, at 7:00 p.m, in the council chambers of the Centennial Building.
Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Kelli
Gillispie and Ray Salazar
Members absent: None
Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Fin Dir /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche,
Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Attorney Melissa Manderschied, Mike
Wocken, Paul Boyum, Stephani Boyum, Cliff Simon, Curt Nelson, Allison Sisk, Nick Beilony
Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in
nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a
Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent
Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
1. Open meeting
Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approve agenda
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
4. Consent agenda
Gillispie requested the removal of item 4C as she wishes to discuss this item.
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the consent agenda as amended.
Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $219,301.95
B. Approve minutes of the March 25, 2014 regular meeting.
C. Removed.
D. Approve 1 -4 Day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for Our Lady of the Lake Catholic
Church for The Blast Block Party on May 17, 2014 with fees paid.
E. Approve Public Gathering Permit for the Red Ribbon Ride bike tour for July 20, 2014
with fees paid.
-754-
Mound City Council Minutes — April 8, 2014
F. Approve Pay Request No. 1 by Michels Corporation in the amount of $228,375.50 for
work completed on the 2013 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project, City Project
No. PW- 13 -06.
G. ORDINANCE NO. 042014: ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 62 OF THE MOUND
CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO STREETS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER PUBLIC
PLACES
H. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -23: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN
ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY
1. Public Gathering Permit
2. Parade Permit
3. Public Dance /Live Music Permit
4. Seasonal Banner and Portable Sign Permit
5. 1 -4 Day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License
Councilmember Gillispie asked for this item to be removed because she would like an
explanation of why fees are waived for this event and not others. Mayor Hanus stated the fees
have always been waived for this event and that the fees are waived because this is a city
sanctioned event and the others are not.
MOTION by Salazar, second by Hanus, to approve Spirit of the Lakes Festival Permits for July
17 -20, 2014 with fees waived. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda
None were offered.
C-
Hanson stated that Spring Park has requested to contract for Community Service Officer
services for nuisance abatement.
Mayor Hanus asked CSO Mike Wocken how much time he thinks will be spent on Spring Park.
Wocken stated the priority will be Mound and he has requested a top 10 list from Spring Park.
He does not foresee that it will be a large commitment. There is one large issue that may take
time initially, but that is an exception.
Hanus noted there are blanks in the effective dates and Hanson said that will be completed by
Spring Park. Attorney Manderschied noted it is subject to annual review by both parties.
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the draft agreement between the cities of
Spring Park and Mound regarding the provision of nuisance enforcement services. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
N
-755-
Mound City Council Minutes —April 8, 2014
Sarah Smith stated an updated resolution has been included in the packet based on the
discussion at the March 12, 2014 regular council meeting.
Gesch referred to page 671, number 21, and asked if this is necessary for the CUP and isn't this
language part of the liquor license code. Discussion ensued and it was determined to leave
number 21 out.
MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution, as amended
striking number 21. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -24: RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)
APPLICATION FROM STEPHANI BOYUM FOR A CLASS III LIQUOR SERVICE
RESTAURANT, AS DEFINED BY CITY CODE SEC 129 -2 AT 2544 COMMERCE
BOULEVARD TO BE CALLED CATTAILS KITCHEN N COCKTAILS — PC CASE NO. 13 -32
Q
Smith stated a request for appeal using the Board of Adjustment and Appeals process is being
used because of the potential impacts on residential zoning and land use. Smith stated this
option is used when the applicant would like a staff decision reviewed by the Planning
Commission and City Council. The appeal request was submitted on or around December 28,
2013 in response to a Staff ruling that alpacas are not allowed per Chapter 14 of the City Code.
This is being treated as a Land Use appeal and the 60 day extension is applicable. Staff
invoked the 60 day extension and the Council needs to make a decision by April 27, 2014.
Smith stated the property consists of two parcels and is approximately 57,000 square feet and
that the applicant has four male Alpacas that she considers pets. Smith provided relevant
research and pointed out sections 14.2 and 14.9 of the Mound City Code that state that certain
animals were grandfathered in as of 5/19160. Smith referenced applicable Minnesota State
Statutes and pointed out that Section 178.03 is silent on alpacas. Smith stated that Mound City
Code requires a commercial kennel license if there are more than 3 cats or dogs on any one
premises.
Staff does not find the keeping of alpacas permitted anywhere in the code in any of the districts.
The Planning Commission agreed with Staff's finding. However, they recommended the
Council consider a code change to allow this type of animal to be treated similar to a dog or cat
in whatever district it is deemed appropriate.
Smith stated as part of the appeal process the City Council must determine if Staff's review and
evaluation was consistent with the City Code. Smith stated no resolution was prepared in
advance and one will be brought back to the next meeting to meet the deadline. Smith stated
animal control is managed by the CSO and he is present in the audience if there are questions.
Hanus stated that Council needs to take two actions. First is to concur or object to Staffs
assessment that alpacas are not allowed by the City Code. Secondly, the Council must decide
on whether to approve or deny the appeal.
Hanus stated he researched multiple hours on the internet and most information is about the
business of fleece and to some extent meat. Hanus was trying to determine if alpacas are farm
animals or a pet, which is more of an issue of use, and the area needed to raise them. Hanus
-756-
Mound City Council Minutes — April 8, 2014
said the information was inconsistent about how large the animals grow and how much area is
required for pasture. Hanus couldn't find any area cities that allow them. Hanus referenced
Minnesota State Statute Rule 6100.0500 which defined alpacas as a horse, which is expressly
not allowed in the code. Hanus stated that alpacas are part of the llama family in state law and
that alpacas were brought to the US in the 1980's so there is not a lot of information on them.
Hanus referred to page 682 where the applicant claims they are considered exotic pets, but
Hanus found no support for it. Hanus stated raccoons and bears could be considered exotic
pets, but they are not necessarily domesticated. Hanus said the Council can't consider just this
case, but must consider it city wide, and that it would impact many areas of the City Code
including zoning, fencing, electrical, building, and setbacks. Hanus stated this is not a simple
solution and felt the Planning Commission should have been more specific in the
recommendations if they support allowing them (minimum lot size, setbacks, etc.).
Ally Sisk, 6221 Westedge Boulevard, stated she never sold an alpaca and that they are all
males. Hanus said he read that most that become pets are rejects from the breeders. Salazar
stated the profit potential is strong from the wool. Salazar said caution must be used in
classifying any mammal as a pet. Salazar stated Mound is not a farming community. Sisk
stated some of the exotic pets Salazar mentioned are specifically prohibited in state law.
Sisk stated they have a split rail cedar fence reinforced with invisible /clear wire netting. Hanus
referenced Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) regarding alpacas as pets. Hanus pointed out
that they are herd animals and that multiple are required. Mound currently limits dogs and cats
to three per household. Wegscheid said the Planning Commission was confused as to whether
the limit was three dogs and three cats or a total of three of either. Hanus said it is the total of
dogs /cats combined.
Gesch asked the age. A year or younger and Sisk stated that they can live up to 15 - 20 years.
Sisk stated they are considered to be fully grown and were chosen for petite size. They are 60
to 90 pounds each. Sisk stated her Great Dane weighs 160 pounds.
Gillispie stated Wikipedia classified alpacas as a domesticated animal and that she finds it very
confusing. Wegscheid said the state language defined livestock as animals intended for
slaughter. Hanus clarified that the language was "horses intended for slaughter."
Gesch said she does not feel the City Code addresses alpacas and that the applicant made a
very good case that they should not be lumped in with horses. Gesch said she does not feel
that Mound is a conducive place for alpacas.
Hanus said there is no way to list every animal and that generalizations are necessary. Hanus
asked the Council to first decide whether this is addressed in the code. Hanson stated Staff and
the Planning Commission have decided that alpacas are not allowed per Sec 14 -2 because it is
not listed, and in his opinion, because it is very much like a farm animal.
Hanson offered two anecdotal examples. Two goats were kept on the City Manager's block and
were confiscated because they are specifically not allowed. A year ago, someone wanted to
raise a family of ducklings and Staff considered them like chickens and ruled that if it is not
specifically mentioned, it is not allowed.
Sisk asked if that needs to be stated in the City Code, otherwise why can't the public assume, if
silent, it is allowed. The Mayor said if someone is in doubt, the City should be contacted.
Hanson added the City relies heavily on past practice.
-757-
Mound City Council Minutes —April 8, 2014
Hanus said Mound is a suburb and the issue of urban agriculture is treated differently by
different cities. Sisk stated the City of Orono and Minnetrista allow them, but Hanus said those
cities are rural and farming communities. Gillispie said she does not consider Mound a suburb.
Gillispie says it should be made clearer in the Code of what is allowed.
Hanus asked the City Attorney what is typical for when the code is silent. Manderschied said
since it is impossible to incorporate everything, there is typically language such as "except" or
"or other animals ", but also that is why there is the Board of Appeals provision.
Hanus poled the Council to see if they concur with Staff and Planning Commission that they are
not allowed under the code. Salazar and Hanus said "yes ", Gillispie said "no," and Gesch and
Wegscheid said they see the need for language that states if the code is silent, then assume it
is not allowed. Hanus said that is not practical. Hanson said Staff uses the "same and similar'
standard often since new terminology like "assisted living" hasn't been written specifically in the
code.
Salazar said it is a stretch to say that since they aren't listed then they are legal. Salazar said
there was an obligation to make a call. Interpretation is up to the governing body and not the
applicants. Sisk said she would have made the same arguments whether she bought them or
not. Salazar said grandfathering them in opens up the floodgates of others seeking the same
exception.
Hanus stated many alpaca owners choose to board them at alpaca farms.
Wegscheid said he agrees there was an obligation to ensure they were permitted. Gillispie
stated that according to the Code.; domesticated animals should be; are - permitted. Hanus said
cows are domesticated as well. Hanus said that it may need to be clarified, but that the Council
needs to decide whether or not the City Code, as it is currently written, allows them. Gesch said
the precedent does need to be considered. Hanus asked if it would help to decide if alpacas
were more like dogs and cats or sheep and horses. Hanus said this is where the City Council is
considered a quasi - judicial body and has to act as judges of the City Code.
Hanus said it is up to the City Council to decide what group these animals should be considered
in, permitted or not. Salazar said you need to look at it from a high level and that the code could
not possibly cover every circumstance and judgments have to be made. Salazar agreed that
the code language could be tightened up.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to concur with Staff and the Planning Commission
that alpacas are not currently permitted under the City Code. Manderschied clarified that the
Council should consider both Chapter 14 Animals and also the R1 zoning as it pertains to what
districts should be considered. Hanus stated he is talking about any zone. The following voted
in favor: Hanus, Salazar, and Wegscheid. The following voted against: Gillispie and Gesch.
The following abstained: None. Motion carried.
Mound City Council Minutes — April 8, 2014
Hanus said Mound is a suburb and the issue of urban agriculture is treated differently by
different cities. Sisk stated the City of Orono and Minnetrista allow them, but Hanus said those
cities are rural and farming communities. Gillispie said she does not consider Mound a suburb.
Gillispie says it should be made clearer in the Code of what is allowed.
Hanus asked the City Attorney what is typical for when the code is silent. Manderschied said
since it is impossible to incorporate everything, there is typically language such as "except" or
"or other animals ", but also that is why there is the Board of Appeals provision.
Hanus poled the Council to see if they concur with Staff and Planning Commission that they are
not allowed under the code. Salazar and Hanus said "yes ", Gillispie said "no," and Gesch and
Wegscheid said they see the need for language that states if the code is silent, then assume it
is not allowed. Hanus said that is not practical. Hanson said Staff uses the "same and similar'
standard often since new terminology like "assisted living" hasn't been written specifically in the
code.
Salazar said it is a stretch to say that since they aren't listed then they are legal. Salazar said
there was an obligation to make a call. Interpretation is up to the governing body and not the
applicants. Sisk said she would have made the same arguments whether she bought them or
not. Salazar said grandfathering them in opens up the floodgates of others seeking the same
exception.
Hanus stated many alpaca owners choose to board them at alpaca farms.
Wegscheid said he agrees there was an obligation to ensure they were permitted. Gillispie
stated domesticated animals should be permitted. Hanus said cows are domesticated as well.
Hanus said that it may need to be clarified, but that the Council needs to decide whether or not
the City Code, as it is currently written, allows them. Gesch said the precedent does need to be
considered. Hanus asked if it would help to decide if alpacas were more like dogs and cats or
sheep and horses. Hanus said this is where the City Council is considered a quasi - judicial body
and has to act as judges of the City Code.
Hanus said it is up to the City Council to decide what group these animals should be considered
in, permitted or not. Salazar said you need to look at it from a high level and that the code could
not possibly cover every circumstance and judgments have to be made. Salazar agreed that
the code language could be tightened up.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to concur with Staff and the Planning Commission
that alpacas are not currently permitted under the City Code. Manderschied clarified that the
Council should consider both Chapter 14 Animals and also the R1 zoning as it pertains to what
districts should be considered. Hanus stated he is talking about any zone. The following voted
in favor: Hanus, Salazar, and Wegscheid. The following voted against: Gillispie and Gesch.
The following abstained: None. Motion carried.
-758-
Mound City Council Minutes — April 8, 2014
MOTION by Hanus seconded by Salazar to reconsider the last motion so it could be restated.
All voted in favor. Motion carried.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to direct staff to prepare a resolution denying the
appeal on the issue of alpacas being permitted by the current City Code with the reasons being
documented /drawn from the minutes. The following voted in favor: Hanus, Salazar, and
Wegscheid. The following voted against: Gillispie and Gesch. The following abstained: none.
Motion carried.
Hanus stated the second action is to decide whether or not alpacas should be allowed. Hanus
said a vast majority of sources referred to them as farm animals and that this is not judging
whether or not they make a good or bad pet. It is a matter of if that activity is a good fit for
Mound which is a fully built city with small lots. Hanson stated there is an alpaca business
headquartered in Mound but they are boarded outside of the city. Wegscheid said he tried to
compare to other pets, like the applicant's Great Dane. Wegscheid said these alpacas are
smaller than some dogs and produce less waste. Wegscheid said he would be open to allowing
them with restrictions.
Gillispie asked the CSO to explain the complaints that have been received. CSO Mike Wocken
said a realtor that had two properties for sale in the area called to express a concern. The
realtor was made aware of it from a neighbor, so the "complaint" was somewhat second hand.
Smith said she received a call on it as well.
Gesch doesn't like the way the code is written but does not feel they should be allowed in
Mound. Salazar does not believe they should be allowed. Salazar commented that allowing
with restrictions makes for more work and enforcement issues. The alpacas must be sheered at
least once a year so it would be difficult to discern whether it is for profit or not. Salazar said
current neighbor's approval should not be considered since they can move and the approval
can change. What happens when people with smaller lots want them or some other species.
Gillispie said she agrees that the size of Mound lots and staff time on enforcement should be
considered. Gillispie asked what the minimum recommended number should be kept since they
are herd animals. Sisk said two is common and that she knows many people in Minnesota that
have them as pets.
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Hanus, to direct staff to amend the animal ordinance to
specifically prohibit alpacas in the City of Mound. Discussion ensued to clarify what the motion
was requiring. Hanus said the motion was specific as to what Staff should do, but that when it
comes back, additional changes could be proposed on alpacas or other animals. The following
voted in favor: Hanus, Gesch and Salazar. The following voted against: Wegscheid. The
following abstained: Gillispie. Motion carried.
9. information /Miscellaneous
A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager:
B. Minutes: Docks & Commons Commission — November 21, 2013
Parks & Open Spaces Commission — December 12, 2013
C. Reports: Hennepin County Assessor 2014 Mound Sales Book
Hennepin County Sheriff's 2013 Annual Report
D. Correspondence: Hennepin County on Seasonal /Non- Homestead Property Owners
Note from Chief Farniok on marijuana forum
-759-
Mound City Council Minutes — April 8, 2014
10. Adjourn
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to adjourn at 9:01 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
r.1
Mayor Mark Hanus
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
APRIL 15, 2014
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on
Tuesday, April 15, 2014, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building.
Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Councilmembers Kelli Gillispie, Ray Salazar, Mark
Wegscheid and Heidi Gesch
Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith,
Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson, Liquor Store Manager John Colotti, Public Works
Director Carlton Moore, Fire Chief Greg Pederson, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine
Pausche, Orono Police Chief Correy Farniok.
1. Open meeting
Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m.
2. Department Head Annual Reports
Annual reports were presented by Department Heads with discussion following.
A. Liquor Store — Manager John Colotti
B. Fire & Rescue /Emergency Response — Fire Chief Greg Pederson
C. Orono Police Department — Police Chief Correy Farniok
D. Finance & Administration /Docks Administration — Finance
Director /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche
E. Community Development/Planning /Zoning /Building Inspections —
Community Development Director Sarah Smith
F. Public Works Divisions
1. Public Works
a. Public Works Director Carlton Moore - Projects
b. Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson - Operations
2. Parks and Open Spaces
a. Public Works Director Carlton Moore
3. Adlourn
MOTION by Wegscheid, seconded by Gesch, to adjourn at 8:46 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Mayor Mark Hanus
-761-
$100 /day
$300 /yr.
Date of Single Dance
License Year
Annual Dance
LICENSE #
CITY OF MOUND
2415 WILSHIRE BLVD.
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
PUBLIC MUSIC PERMIT APPLICATION
%D�,ANCE/LIVE
A ( QS+ r
A,,
EVENT: �J r
' ) �S �b
LOCATION OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC: ��i a f�_e
6"D / Y1% 11-lb 0 rj1
TYPE OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC:t7
TIME PERIOD OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC
Sunday: 8pm- 11(:30pm}�
(HOURS PERMITTED: Mon -Sat: 8pm- 12:30am —
CHAIRPERSON OR (� 1 1 TITLE: /^4C1 M� i 5`4-(�D �-
1� �,+1
�n LA fi o
CANT: Yl C,
APPLICANT':_
tt
ADDRESS:bUC �Be b � ADDRESS:02&� _ id
M Ou Ad
E-MAIL C�UfiG�F'o�� °�J% kl.rnn.us
021PHONE #:_ 4i 1c)' q0HOME PHONE #:
WORK PHONE #: 7,f5,A -x/70. -Ld24 WORK PHONE #:
J
Date Applicant's Signature
Department Approval /Denial
Ll/ G� (Submit memo if denied)
Approved Denied
Police Dept.
Adm.d.
Fire Dent.
-762-
An
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone 952 -472 -0600 Fax 952- 472 -0620
SEASONAL, BANNER &
PORTABLE SIGN PERMIT
APPLICATION
SITE
Property Address 2385 Commerce Blvd.
Zone
Business Name Our Lady of the Lake Church
Phone 952- 472 -1284
APPLICANT
Name Rhonda M. Eurich, Administrator Email
reurich @oll.pvt.kl2.mn.us_
Phone 952 -472 -1284 ext. 161 Fax 952 -472 -1216
Other
OWNER
Name Fr. Tony O'Neill, Pastor
Phone 952-472 -1284 ext. 172 Fax 952 -472 -1216
Other
SIGN
Company Name
Address
CONTRACTOR
Contact Person
Email
Phone Fax
Other
See City Code Chapter 365.15 Subd 9 and 10
❑ Seasonal Sign $25 - Dates from to Size — feet x feet = _sf
Message
Seasonal Signs - Seasonal signs of a temporary or portable nature may be used in the non - residential districts to
promote or advertise on- premise seasonal services or merchandise. Such signs shall be limited to a maximum of
thirty -two (32) square feet and shall not be left in place for more than a two (2) month period. Permits and fees
shall be required for all seasonal signs, and permits may be issued no more than two (2) times per calendar
year per business.
❑ Banner /Pennant $25 - Dates from to
Describe event
Sign locations (list or attach map)
Temporary banners and pennants employed for grand openings or business establishments, special events or
promotions and holidays are not exempt from permits and fees and shall be removed within fifteen (15) days
upon permit issuance unless an alternate schedule is approved by the City Council. Temporary banners and
pennants are prohibited from being placed upon any decorative fencing unless the banner or pennant is used in
conjunction with a government, a quasi - public function, or similar - related special event. Permits for banners and
pennants can be issued no more than four (4) times per calendar year.
X Portable Sign (no fee) - Dates from ASAP_ to May 18, 2014 Number of signs 3
Sign locations (list or attach map) 2155 Commerce Blvd., 2411 Commerce Blvd and
5401 Shoreline Dr. Please see attached letter!
Describe sign (message, materials, etc.) Our Lady of the Lake's Annual School
Fundraiser, called the "BLAST."
-763-
Portable Signs used for the purpose of directing the public may be permitted under the following conditions:
(a) Said sign is coincidental to, or used in conjunction with, a governmental unit or quasi - public function;
and
(b) The period of use of said sign shall not exceed ten (10) consecutive days, and
(c) Signs shall not be used more than four (4) times during a calendar year; and
(d) Signs shall be placed on the premises of the advertised event and /or on such other premises following
approval of a temporary sign permit by the City of Mound. Administrative approval of a portable sign permit is
permitted if the following conditions are met:
1. The sign is not being placed on public property.
2. Written permission from the property owner of record is provided if being located off - premises.
3. The criteria reference in subsections (a), (b), and (c) above are met.
4. The proposed location of the sign is reviewed and deemed acceptable by Mound Staff, which shall
include the Police, Planning, and Engineering Departments, based on the following criteria:
• The sign is not being placed in the road right -of -way.
• The sign does not obstruct the sight triangle for pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
• Placement of the sign does not create any potential traffic or other related hazard; and
(e) Portable sign placement on public property requires City Council approval, and
(f) Such signs shall require the issuance of a permit but will be exempt from all fees, and
(g) In the instance of a multi -use facility, only one seasonal sign may be placed on the premises at any one
time.
Applicants are advised that incomplete applications or insufficient information can delay the
processing of the permit request or may result in the application being rejected. Please fully complete
all involved sections of the application and provide as much detail as possible, including, but not
limited to, the proposed locations of signs, using addresses or landmarks, and written permission
from the property owner for off -site locations.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
(OFFICE USE ONLY) SPECIAL CONDITIONS & COMMENTS:
RECEIVED BY & DATE
PLANS CHECKED BY
I APPROVED BY & DATE
COPIED
APPROVED
ZONING
-764-
Our Lady of the Lake Church
2385 Commerce Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364
952 -472 -1284
Our'BLAST' signs will be placed at the following establishments:
Carbone's Pizzeria and Grill
2155 Commerce Blvd.
Current Owner has given us their permission.
Caribou Coffee
5401 Shoreline Drive
Current Owner has given us permission
OLL School Fence
2411 Commerce Blvd.
All of the Signs are Tx 20.'
Thank you for your consideration. If you have any question, please contact me.
Rhonda Eurich, Administrator
952 - 472 -1284 ext. 161
-765-
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472 -0604
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Sarah Smith
City of Mound
Planning and Building Department
Date: April 17, 2014
Re: 2014 Mound Fire Relief Association Annual Fish Fry — Temporary Sign Permit(s)
SUMMARY
The Mound Fire Relief Association is requesting approval of a temporary sign permit(s) for the Annual
Fish Fry event which is being held on Saturday, June 7, 2014. Waiver of the $25.00 temporary sign
permit and extended periods for the portable signs are being requested. In summary, the following
signs are proposed:
Banners — 2 locations adjacent to County Roads in Mound (545ide Park and Mound Fire Station)
Hennepin County Transportation Department electronic sign boards -3 signs
Details regarding the request are included on temporary sign permit application that has been
submitted.
Respectfully, Staff offers the following information:
1. Pennant / Banner. City Code Section 119 -4 (i) (3) allows temporary banners and pennants
employed for special events as long as they are removed after (30) days unless an extended period
is approved by the City Council. The requested 5/24/14 — 6/07/14 timeframe is within the
standard 30 -day period.
2. Portable Signs. City Code Section 119 allows for the placement of portable signs and is eligible for
administrative approval in most instances subject to conditions, including a 30 -day allowance.
Portable sign placement on public property requires approval by the City Council. The requested
05/24/14- 06/07/14 timeframe is within the standard 30 -day period.
3. General Sign Provisions Applicable to All Districts.
Illuminated Signs. No illuminated sign which changes in either color or intensity of light
shall be permitted except one giving time, date, temperature, weather or similar public
service information. The City, in granting permits for illuminated signs, shall specify the
hours during which same may be kept lighted when necessary to prevent the creation of a
nuisance.
-766-
4. Similar to previous years, the Fire Department plans to use the Hennepin County electronic
sign message boards to promote the annual 2014 fish fry event.
RECOMMENDATION
City staff recommends that the City Council approve the temporary sign permit request(s) for banners
and the Hennepin County Transportation Department electronic sign boards for the Mound Fire
Department Fish Fry 2014 event and grants permission for sign placement on City -owned property
subject to the following conditions:
1. As applicable, the applicant shall work with Staff to evaluate all proposed sign locations.
The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining permission from the current property
owner for sign placement on private property.
2. Submittal of a temporary permit application and waiver of the involved fee.
3. The City shall reserve the right to regulate hours of operation for any illuminated sign so as
to prevent the creation of a nuisance, if applicable.
4. The applicants obtain permission from all private property owners prior to placement.
5. All signage is removed immediately following the event.
6. No signs can be placed within any County Road right -of -way unless approval is granted by
Hennepin County.
7. No sign shall be placed in the sight triangle or obstruct vehicle or pedestrian traffic. Sign
placement shall be subject to field modification by Mound Staff, if needed.
0 Page 2
-767-
b
2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mound, MN 55364
Phone 952 - 472 -0600 Fax 952472 -0620
SITE
APPLICANT
OWNER
SIGN
CONTRACTOR
Property Address
Business Name
•
fAJ
•
Note: Any information supplied on this form will be considered public
according to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act.
Phone
i2 -eS
Name
' c
cnr r'4
6ritr SSOUO -fteV -
rsni1 Email CAIl l
� r"O �fYe
Phone_
Fax 2152-4' -,577a' Other
(rOYh
Name Ut> df MOLL? end NOOMY firms Det7rt1±01m f
Phone g5o2 -L/%A- 0&03 Fax g5a yid -06�n Other
Company Name (,(.LS`{- nq // IGaJ�e YiYIBI'�- Wameyli11 fill 6' %eC
Address A1114
Contact Person -� /)ry'lJJInF
Phone q6_A- K-7,) -. 9 4Z_<
Other
❑ Seasonal Sign $25 - Dates from to Size _ feet x _ feet = sf
Message
Seasonal Signs - Seasonal signs of a temporary or portable nature may be used in the non - residential districts to
Promote or advertise on- premise seasonal services or merchandise. Such signs shall be limited to a maximum of
thirty -two (32) square feet and shall not be left in place for more than a two (2) month period. Permits and fees
shall be required for all seasonal signs, and permits may be issued no more than two (2) times per calendar
year per business.
'Banner /Pennant $25 - Dates from S � t4 to
Describe event MYF8 Rc kef A<An,w frn-
Sign locations (list or attach map)
Temporary banners and pennants employed for grand openings of business establishments, special events or
promotions and holidays are not exempt from permits and fees and shall be removed within thirty (30) days
upon permit issuance unless an alternate schedule is approved by the City Council. Temporary banners and
pennants are prohibited from being placed upon any decorative fencing unless the banner or pennant is used in
conjunction with a government, a quasi - public function, or similar - related special event. Permits for banners and
pennants can be issued no more than four (4) times per calendar year.
RJ Portable Sign (no fee) - Dates from to 4 a- t4- Number of signs 3
Sign locations (list or attach map) d esAU?U- MafYrlc.ietI{J �Sli�fQtr(/Ze (fir
. f , . t —
Describe sign (message, materials, etc.) J i rd5 G„ � U� ,�L�
�Yec of M i e L14 Hell
ne�in 'lam768zc_l��f
A
Portable Signs used for the purpose of directing the public may be permitted under the following conditions:
(a) Said sign is coincidental to, or used in conjunction with, a governmental unit or quasi - public function;
and
(b) The period of use of said sign shall not exceed thirty (30) consecutive days; and
(c) Signs shall not be used more than four (4) times during a calendar year; and
(d) Signs shall be placed on the premises of the advertised event and /or on such other premises following
approval of a temporary sign permit by the City of Mound. Administrative approval of a portable sign permit is
permitted if the following conditions are met:
1. The sign is not being placed on public property.
2. Written permission from the property owner of record is provided if being located off - premises.
3. The criteria reference in subsections (a), (b), and (c) above are met.
4. The proposed location of the sign is reviewed and deemed acceptable by Mound Staff, which shall
include the Police, Planning, and Engineering Departments, based on the following criteria:
• The sign is not being placed in the road right -of -way.
• The sign does not obstruct the sight triangle for pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
Placement of the sign does not create any potential traffic or other related hazard; and
(e) Portable sign placement on public property requires City Council approval; and
(f) Such signs shall require the issuance of a permit but will be exempt from all fees; and
(g) In the instance of a multi -use facility, only one seasonal sign may be placed on the premises at any one
time.
Applicants are advised that incomplete applications or insufficient information can delay the
processing of the permit request or may result in the application being rejected. Please fully complete
all involved sections of the application and provide as much detail as possible, including, but not
limited to, the proposed locations of signs, using addresses or landmarks, and written permission
from the property owner for off -site locations.
(OFFICE USE ONLY) SPECIAL CONDITIONS & COMMENTS:
16 A?x ll, -AO /0,1
DATE
RECEIVED BY & DATE
PLANS CHECKED BY
APPROVED BY & DATE
COPIED
APPROVED
ZONING
1&9 5 .r
$100 /day (f 1i A t
7
f 300 /yr.
Date of Single Dance
License Year
Annual Dance
LICENSE#
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
PUBLIC DANCE/LIVE MUSIC PERMIT APPLICATION
EVENT: Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association - Fish Fry and Dance 2014
LOCATION OF DANCE /LIVE MUSIC: in front of Mound fire station, on drive apron and in
roadway at 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound
TYPE OF DANCE /LIVE MUSIC: Variety of Dance, Rock -n -Roll, and Oldies
TIME PERIOD OF DANCE /LIVE MUSIC: Saturday June 7,2014,8:00 pm -12:00 midnight
(HOURS PERMITTED: Mon -Sat: 8pm- 12:30am — Sunday: 8pm- 11:30pm)
CHAIRPERSON OR
APPLICANT: Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association
TITLE: Fire Chief Gregory S. Pederson
ADDRESS: 2415 Wilshire Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364
HOME PHONE #: 952- 292 -0150
WORK PHONE #: 952 -472 -3533
�-
Date
ADDRESS: 6087 Aspen Road
Mound, MN 55364
HOME PHONE #: same
WORK PHONE #: ssar e®
,, ! _ZA
Applicant's Signa e l
wl,�_ ) Department Approval/Denial
Mlaiv
(Submit memo if denied)
Ap ro ed Denied'
A, , Police Dept.
Adm.
Fire De t. /
.•
Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number _
Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association Jan 4,1937
Address City State Zip Code
2415 Wilshire Blvd Mound I IMinnescita 155364
Name of person making application Business phone Home phone
Gregory 5, Pederson, Fire Chief 952- 472 -3555 952 -472 -5785
Date(s) of event Type of organization
June 7, 2014 E] Club 0 Charitable [] Religious ® Other non -profit
Organization officer's name City State Zip
Andrew Drilling- Relief President Mound Minnesota 55364
Add New Officer
Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe.
2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mound, MN 55364- located at the Mound Fire Station inside apparatus bay and outside building in parking lot
and on front apron.
If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service.
N/A
if the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage.
Minnesota Joint Underwriting Association - Minnesota Liquor Liability Assigned Risk Plan - Coverage $1,000,000
APPROVAL
APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
City of Mound
City /County
Waived
City Fee Amount
N/A
Date Fee Paid
IN
Date Approved
Permit Date
Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
(VOTE: Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and /or county to the address
above If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the
permit for the event.
kQ� b a cb- -b Q 5a HID D 10 AO
-770-
Page 1 of 1
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division
444 Cedar Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101
651- 201 -7500 Fax 651- 297 -5259 TTY 651- 282 -6555
APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY
A €cohaE & Gambling Enforcement
TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number _
Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association Jan 4,1937
Address City State Zip Code
2415 Wilshire Blvd Mound I IMinnescita 155364
Name of person making application Business phone Home phone
Gregory 5, Pederson, Fire Chief 952- 472 -3555 952 -472 -5785
Date(s) of event Type of organization
June 7, 2014 E] Club 0 Charitable [] Religious ® Other non -profit
Organization officer's name City State Zip
Andrew Drilling- Relief President Mound Minnesota 55364
Add New Officer
Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe.
2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mound, MN 55364- located at the Mound Fire Station inside apparatus bay and outside building in parking lot
and on front apron.
If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service.
N/A
if the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage.
Minnesota Joint Underwriting Association - Minnesota Liquor Liability Assigned Risk Plan - Coverage $1,000,000
APPROVAL
APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
City of Mound
City /County
Waived
City Fee Amount
N/A
Date Fee Paid
IN
Date Approved
Permit Date
Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
(VOTE: Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and /or county to the address
above If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the
permit for the event.
kQ� b a cb- -b Q 5a HID D 10 AO
-770-
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
' )c a { h l3 931811
Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals.
Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability
of the police in maintaining order.
NO LIOUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS.
Group. is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park area.
GCi
PERMIT FEE: $300/DAY TO $600/DAY* 3D6 Pat-
DAMAGE DEPOSIT: $500 TO $1000/DAY* SOO 11) ac& `417
*Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff
upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements.
Date(s) of Use
Area to be Used
Time Frame 12 00 - -Yl
Intended Use
Somas
Expected Attendance
/D D P1 R e
/ - }1 c J/t_
30— 0 ' TpP - r '7; 1-5
Organization %%%
`Gt yt e7`o aka
CAas /L,
ea-Sy CIK�6
Representative's Name 1-Q
Address z S-52 iii 2zz74 GUS
Telephone No. Home: 5'27-3,51-666 5 : C e'll/
Drivers License Number :2 2 V j B 3 15 4 6) 3
Deriartmental AvDroval
a- 1D
CIV Clerk
Police Dept.
Park Dept.
-771-
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472 -0636
Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Carlton Moore, Public Works Director
Date: April 22, 2014
Re: Parks and Open Space Commission recommendation for the new playscape location
At its April 10, 2014 meeting Parks and Open Space Commission reviewed the recommended
locations for the new playscape structure the City recently purchased with the assistance of a
grant. The two locations being considered were Sorbo Park on Evergreen Road and Three
Points Park. The two existing playscape structures are in similarly poor condition and the
commission chose Three Points Park for the installation this year.
Recommendation
staff recommends the City Council approve the installation of the new playscape structure at
Three Points Park.
-772-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING WeCAB WEEK IN MOUND
MAY 4-10,2014
WHEREAS, in 2010, door -to -door dial -a -ride services were curtailed, resulting in transportation
gaps in weekday service to the Mound area; and
WHEREAS, dial -a -ride weekend services were also eliminated; and
WHEREAS, there was a plea from the community for the City to look at the issue and to assist
by way of allowing City resources to be put toward addressing the transportation gaps; and
WHEREAS, key leaders within the community came together and verified the need to fill the
transportation gaps of the greater community; and
WHEREAS, out of this study and commitment by the communities, came WeCAB —
Community Area Busing; and
WHEREAS, door -to -door rides are provided by volunteer drivers to shopping, work, church,
social and medical appointments; and
WHEREAS, rides are posted by volunteer dispatchers and drivers get to choose their trips; and
WHEREAS, the rides are made affordable through subsidies by Ridgeview Medical Center,
Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging and other generous local sponsors; and
WHEREAS, WeCAB is an award winning local effort, as a recipient of the "Hospital Charitable
Services Award" from Jackson Health Care in Atlanta, Georgia, January 2013; and
WHEREAS, the concept is coveted in neighboring regions, with expansion being the next great
effort that will add to WeCAB's long -term sustainability.
WHEREAS, WeCAB, serving Mound and the five neighbor cities of Spring Park, Navarre,
Minnetrista, St Bonifacius and Maple Plain, significantly contributes to the independence of the
members of these communities, getting area residents to shopping, work church, social and
medical appointments.
-773-
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, to recognize WeCAB and declare May 4 -10, 2014, as "WeCAB Week in Mound,"
and appreciate and recognize the Volunteer Drivers and Dispatchers of the greater area for their
volunteerism and support of personal independence and economic sustainability of our
communities.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April, 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
-774-
Mayor Mark Harms
February 2, 2014
Dear Mayor /City Representative,
This is to update your on the concept we have raised to consider establishing a scenic byway around Lake
Minnetonka.
First, let me apologize for the delay in getting this off the ground. We have had some difficulty coordinating a
time with the state scenic byway office for them to conduct an informational meeting for us. They have now
committed to a time and place. Here is the information:
Subject: Scenic Byway Concept for Lake Minnetonka
Date: Monday, February 24, 2014
Time: 9:30 - 11:00 a.m.
Place: Headquarters, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard, Minnetonka, MN
55345
Attending from the State (MNDOT):
Katie Caskey, Office of Transportation System Management
Lynette Roshell, Office of State Aid
Carol Zoff, Transportation Alternative Coordinator
Holly Slagle, Scenic Byway Coordinator
The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss the relative merits /costs /issues involved in creating a scenic
byway. We will present some of the thinking behind the proposal, and the state will discuss implementation
details as well as some of their experiences with other byways in the state.
I very much hope you can attend. If you are unable to do so, I would invite you to designate someone else to
participate in your place. I am confident we will know a lot more about the undertaking by the end of the
meeting. We can then share that with our respective cities to decide whether it makes sense or not.
I look forward to seeing you on the 24th.
Warm regards,
Ken Willcox
Mayor
City of Wayzata
Phone: 952- 404 -5300 Fax. 952- 404 -5318 e7.77.5..-Y@wayzata.org home page: www.wayzata org
Mayor:
City of Wayzata
Ken Willcox
600 Rice Street
City Council:
Wayzata, NIN 55391 -1734
Jack Amdal
Andrew Mullin
Tom Tanner
Bridget Anderson
City bhmager:
Heidi Nelson
This is to update your on the concept we have raised to consider establishing a scenic byway around Lake
Minnetonka.
First, let me apologize for the delay in getting this off the ground. We have had some difficulty coordinating a
time with the state scenic byway office for them to conduct an informational meeting for us. They have now
committed to a time and place. Here is the information:
Subject: Scenic Byway Concept for Lake Minnetonka
Date: Monday, February 24, 2014
Time: 9:30 - 11:00 a.m.
Place: Headquarters, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard, Minnetonka, MN
55345
Attending from the State (MNDOT):
Katie Caskey, Office of Transportation System Management
Lynette Roshell, Office of State Aid
Carol Zoff, Transportation Alternative Coordinator
Holly Slagle, Scenic Byway Coordinator
The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss the relative merits /costs /issues involved in creating a scenic
byway. We will present some of the thinking behind the proposal, and the state will discuss implementation
details as well as some of their experiences with other byways in the state.
I very much hope you can attend. If you are unable to do so, I would invite you to designate someone else to
participate in your place. I am confident we will know a lot more about the undertaking by the end of the
meeting. We can then share that with our respective cities to decide whether it makes sense or not.
I look forward to seeing you on the 24th.
Warm regards,
Ken Willcox
Mayor
City of Wayzata
Phone: 952- 404 -5300 Fax. 952- 404 -5318 e7.77.5..-Y@wayzata.org home page: www.wayzata org
-776-
-777-
r
U
0
•
r_
•
•
27
a
•
-778-
Cf)
M
U)
>
M
m
m
0
0
>1
W
-Y
0
0
c
m
0
m
.2
0
D
a-
,E5
U)
cro)
(L)
C:
a)
0
c
C:
20mo
c
N
0
0
.—
0
0
>,
(L)
M
0
0
0
CL
>
0
U)
0
,
w
Co
-C
Ilu
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
>1
-778-
-779-
1
ME
co
M
co
M
a)
Co
O
C�
ui
ME
-781-
_0
C6
j2
>
co
(3
0
4-a
U
o
CO
m
4-a
0
CL
4-a
E
u)
ED,
m
cu
C:
m
ui
-781-
-782-
Q
O
co
co
4—
0
4-a
4—
0
CIO
(a)
C)
. ....
co
�
� \�
CL
-782-
Im
•m
Proposal for a Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway
(Prepared by Ron Anderson, Wayzata)
Why create a Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway?
To Protect Resources: An official byway makes it easier to argue for preserving natural,
scenic and historical resources.
To Enhance Community Recognition: State and National byways increase the visibility
of —a road corridor, the communities connected, and the resources available.
Ta Enhance Community Pride and Vision: Byways connect communities and promote
the importance of historical sites, and the richness of natural, scenic and recreation
resources.
To Encourage Partnering: Not only do byways bring communities together, but also they
suggest reasons for cooperative activities involving businesses, nonprofit organizations,
and voluntary groups. A sense of common good may emerge and help to guide
improvements in the lives of all residents in the byway corridor.
To Boost Economic Development: Perhaps the most tangible benefit from byway
designation comes from economic development. This results from both tourism and
increased use of business services by residents within the byway corridor. This can
result in more community pride and vitality.
Slight increases in traffic are a small price to pay for improving the image of the Lake as
a whole and appreciation of its resources. For example, have you been to Gale Woods
or the Excelsior Museum or the Burwell House? Read down the list in Table 1, which
contains about 140 "attractions" around the lake to see how many of these places you
have not experienced. Think also about the future. If we do not do more now to
preserve natural and historical resources, they may be lost to future generations.
What is a scenic byway?
A "scenic byway" is a transportation corridor recognized for one or more archeological,
cultural, historic, natural, recreational and scenic qualities. It can be designated as such
nationally, by a State, or by a local unit of government. We seek official recognition of a
Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway by the State of Minnesota.
Minnesota's Scenic Byways Program has so far approved 22 scenic byways in the
State. Funds can be awarded by the state or national scenic byway programs for
planning, conservation, preservation and marketing activities of potential byways.
The National Scenic Bvways Program administered by the U.S. Department of
Transportation is a grass -roots collaborative effort established to help preserve and
-785-
enhance selected roads throughout the United States. The National Scenic Byways
Program has funded 2,926 projects for state and nationally designated byway routes.
What is Proposed for a Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway?
The Lake area has been divided into four scenic routes in the two maps below. The first
map shows the Eastern portion of the Lake as the main scenic byway with a side or
auxiliary route from Wayzata to Minnetonka Mills, which in the early days before the
Gray's Bay Dam was part of Lake Minnetonka. On the first map, the main scenic byway
route is shown in pink and the Minnetonka Mills side route is marked in green. The
starting point of each route is marked as mile 0 (zero) and the other numbers along the
route are the distances in miles from the starting points.
The second map (Map 2), gives the western end of the lake including not only the
Upper Lake but also the headwaters area to St. Bonifacius. This Western route is
marked in blue. A side or auxiliary route along North Shore Drive is marked in purple.
Each of the two main routes adds up to about 20 miles in length for a total of 41 miles.
The side (auxiliary) routes add an additional 11 miles. The scenic byway plan as now
conceived involves the following 14 communities:
Excelsior
Orono
Deephaven
Shorewood
Greenwood
Spring Park
Minnetonka
St. Bonifacius
Minnetonka Beach
Tonka Bay
Minnetrista
Wayzata
Mound
Woodland.
However, there are only four principal Chambers of Commerce and six Historical
Societies. (See Table 2 for a list.) Thus, the organization work will be less demanding
than it might seem.
Among the many pieces of this project that remain to be completed is a complete listing
of the key historical sites around the lake. A preliminary list of about 50 historical sites is
embedded in both Tables 1 and 2 However, this list is not complete. Note that no
current residences are included in the list of historical sites because of privacy
considerations. The current list of sites is not yet completed, as most of the existing
historical commercial buildings in Excelsior and Wayzata are not yet included. The
historical societies will be solicited for help in making a complete list.
The workshop on June 21, led by Bill Neuman, will begin to clarify the remaining work to
be done and how best to organize to get all of the cities and organizations around the
lake to work together.
EM
ffne M-
Lake
Minnetonka Scenic 8 wa (Proposed Routes with Attractions and Places
Route
Mile
Attraction or Place
A
A. Main Scenic B wa Route U er Lake
A
0
We zata Blvd at Freeway Exit for Co. Rd. 101 South.
A
0.5
Bushaway (Co. Rd. 1011 and McGinty (Co. Rd 16) Intersection
A
0.7
Locust Hills Trail and Old Sweatts Barn
A
1.3
Bushaway Causeway Between Gray's Bay and Wayzata Bay
A
1.5
Gray's Bay Bridge
A
1.6
Gray's Bay Public Access & Marina
A
1.8
Stone Arch on McKenzie Rd off Breezy Pt. Rd
A
2.4
Groveland Community on Minnetonka Blvd at 101 (Ty Abel's Corner)
A
2.6
Deephaven City Line
A
2.9
Minnetonka Blvd continues on Maplewood Rd Going South
A
3.5
Thorpe Park _
A
Minnetonka Blvd continues right on Carson's Bay Boulevard
A
4.6
Deephaven Public Access
E4.3
A
4.7
Minnetonka Yacht Club and Carson's Bay Bridge
A
5
Deephaven City Hall
A
5
Cottagewood Rd to Cottagewood General Store (0 -3 mile)
A
5
Crossing of Lake Minnetonka Regional LRT Trail with Parking
A
5.7
Greenwood City Limits
A
6.6
Old Log Theatre _
A
6.7
Greenwood Marina
A
6.8
St- Albans Bay Bridge
A
7
Excel Marina
A
7.1
End of Trolley Line
Port of Excelsior and Excelsior CommonslPark/Seach
A
T5
A
L
7.6
Dock Cinema and various other historical sites in Excelsior
South Lake - Excelsior Chamber of Commerce, 202 Water St,
A
7.6
A
7.7
Excelsior Old public School at 260 School Rd & Excelsior High School
A
7.7
Excelsior History Society and Museum and Excelsior Trolley Line begins
A
7.7
Crossing of Lake Minnetonka Regional LRT Trail with Parking
A
81
Highway 19 intersection with Water St.
A
9.1
Shorewood City Hall
A
9.2
Mail at Smithtown Rd
A
9.7
Manitou Park
A
10.2
Old Orchard Park (on West side of road)
A
10.3
Tonka Bay City Hall
A
10.7
Tonka Bay Rd. to Tonka Bay Marina and Caribbean Marina
A
10.9
Old Channel Bay
A
Narrows Bridge
A
_11.3
12
Navarre City Line
A
12 -1
Gray Freshwater Laboratory
A
122
Co. Rd. 15 (Shoreline Dr.) Intersection with Co. Rd. 19
A
12.5
Minnetonka Beach City Hall
-789-
-790-
A
13
St. Martins Church and Westwood Rd. to historic Lafayette Bay Country Club
A
13.6
Minnetonka Beach City Park
A
13.8
Orono City line
A
13
Arcola Bridge
A
14.1
Smith's Bay
A
14.6
Highway 51 (N. Shore Dr.) Intersection with Co. R. 15 (Shoreline Dr.)
A
14.8
Sailors World Marina _
A
15.3
Brackets Point
A
15.5
Tanager Lake
A
157
Browns Bay Marina and N. Shore Marina East
A
16
Orono Orchard Road
A
16.5
Ferndale Marsh
A
16.7
-- ._
Shoreline Dr. (Co. Rd. 15) exits toward Wayzata
A
17.1
Woodhill Country Club
A
17.5
Blake School
A
17.8
Ferndale Road South and Grove Lane East
A
A
18
Wayzata Beach and Regional Trail Parking
Wayzata Boat Works and Wayzata Marine
18.1
A
18.2
Wayzata Train Depot, Historical Society & Chamber of Commerce
A
18.5
Wayzata Waterfront (Lake Street) and various historical sites
A.
18.7
Wayzata New Muni (Lake St & Superior Blvd)
A
18.8
Promenade of Wayzata (Old Wayzata Bay Center)
A
19.2
Colonial Mall (Wayzata Blvd &Central)
A
19.7
Bushaway Rd (Co. Rd 101) and Wayzata Blvd (Co- Rd. 15)
B
B. Minnetonka Mills Aux. Scenic B wa Route
B _
B
0
Wayzata New Muni (Lake St & Superior Blvd)
Wayzata Bay Shops and Wayzata Bay Center
0.2
B
0.5
Wayzata Public Access (continuing on McGinty West (Co. Rd. 16)
B
0.5
Wayzata Yacht Club
B
0.9
Bushaway (Co. Rd. 101) Intersection with McGinty West (Co. Rd. 16)
B
2
Rufus Rand House (now Cargill Headquarters)
B
3.5
End of McGinty West at Minnetonka Blvd (Co- Rd. 5)
B
3.6
494 Overpass over Minnetonka Blvd
B
4.1
Intersection with Plymouth Rd (Co. Rd. 61)
B
4.2
Historic Burwell House and Burwell Park,13209 McGinty Rd East
B
4.2
Mill Cottage and Mill Office/Workshop, 13209 McGinty Rd East
B
42
Walking Tour of Old Minnetonka Miils,13209 McGinty Rd East
B
4.3
Heading West on Minnetonka Rd (Co. Rd. 5)
B
5.9
Minnetonka Government and Community Center and Ice Arena
B
6.9
Fairchild Ave and Grays Bay Blvd to Gray's Bay Dam
B
7.4
"Gro Tonka" Park
B
7.5
Groveland Cemetery and Groveland School
B
7.9
Intersection of Minnetonka Blvd with Co. Rd. 101 (Ty Abel's Corner)
C
C. Western Scenic Bgwav Route (U Doer Lake and Gale Woods
C
0
Smithtown Rd Intersection with Manitou Rd (Co. Rd. 19
C
0.1
Minnetonka Country Club
C
0.8
Smithtown Way and Crossing of Lake Mtka LRT Trail
-790-
C
2
Howards Point Road to Howard Point R Marina
C
2
Peter Gideon Farmhouse, 24590 Glen Rd off Howard Point Rd
C
3.2
Lake Virginia Public Boat Access
C
3.5
Hwv 7 turn west
Lake Zumbra
C
4.7
C
4.8
Minnetrista City Line
C
5.2
Co. Rd. 44 North Intersection
C
5.2
Lake Minnetonka Regional Park and 0.2 miles north on Co. Rd. 44)
C
5.2
_Beach
Crane Island Historic District (.3 miles off Regional Park)
C
9.2
Carver Park Access
C
10,8
Six Mile Marsh
C
10.9
St. Bonifacius
C
71.2
Dakota Trail Crossing HCRRA
C
11.5
Main St Co. R. 92 Going North
C
11.5
St. Bonifacius Public Library_
C
12.6
Bartlett Blvd Co. Rd. 110 Going East
C
C
14.6
14.6
_
Entrance to Gate Woods and Crossing Dakota Trail
Entrance to Westonka Recreational Park
C
14.8
Halstead Drive to public access to Halsted Bay
C
1T3
Cook's Bay Park with public access
C
17.9
Lake Minnetonka Area Chamber of Commerce (2323 Commerce Blvd, Mound)
C
18.1
Intersection of Co. Rd. 110 with Shoreline Blvd Co. Rd. 15
C
18.2
Mound business district and Mound City Hall
C
18.3
Lost Lake and Marsh
C
18.5
Old Tonka Toys facto
Seton Bridge and Spring Park City Line
C
19.2
C
20.2
Old Tonka Toys Headquarters
C
20.2
County Sheriff Water Patrol
C
20.3
Sunset Drive Co. Rd. 51
C
20.3
S r ng Park City Hall (Spring Park Elementary School, 4.349 Warren Ave
C
20.3
Westonka Yacht Club
Public boat access and restroom
C
20.3
C
20.8
Casco Point Circle Park
C
21.1
end of scenic loo Intersection of Co. Rd. 15 with Go. Rd. 19
D
D. North Shore Dr. Aux. Scenic 8 a Route
D
0
Co. Rd. 15 (Shoreline Dr.) Intersection with Go. Rd. 19
D
0.4
Coffee Bridge and Lord Fletcher's Old Lake Lodge
D
1.1
Hendrickson's Bridge
D
12
Public Beach Access and restrooms
D
1.3
Wayzata Marine
D
1.8
North Shore Marina
D
2.1
Noerenber 's Bride _
Noerenberq Memorial Park _
D
2.3
D
31
Minnetonka Art School
D
12
_
Crossing of Dakota Rail Trail _
D
3.4
End of N. Shore Dr. Co. Rd. 51 at Co. Rd. 15
-791-
Additional Resources of Proposed Lake Minnetonka Proposed Scenic Byways
Including Historical Attractions by City, Historical Society, Chambers of
Commerce, Parks and Preserves, and Trails
Historical Attractions by City
o Excelsior
• Excelsior Historical Society & Museum, 305 Water St
• Old Excelsior Public School Bldg., 261 School Ave (1899)
• Excelsior High school (1916)
• Trinity Episcopal Church Chapel, 300 Second St (1863) in National
Register
• Dock Cinema, 26 Water St
• Oak Hill Cemetery, Excelsior Blvd
• Excelsior streetcar line (1906)
• Minnehaha Steamboat at Bayside Marine
• Deephaven
• Minnetonka Yacht Club
• Cottagewood General Store, Cottagewood (1893)
• Greenwood
F Greenwood Marina
° The Old Log Theater
o Minnetonka
Burwell House, 13209 McGinty Rd E. (1883)
Mill Cottage, 13209 McGinty Rd E. (1894 moved)
Mill Office/Workshop, 13209 McGinty Rd E. (1894 moved)
o Minnetonka Beach
Camp Memorial Chapel (1888) now St Martin's on the Lake Chapel
Lafayette Country Club (1899)
Minnetonka Beach City Hall
o Minnetrista
6 Crane Island Historic District
• Mound
a Mound Baptist Assembly Grounds (1900) now Highland Park
Bridge to Halstead's Bay (1890)
g Former Tonka Toy factory (1967)
• Orono
• Noerenberg Estate (now Memorial GardenSO (1903)
• Woodhill Country Club (1917)
o Shorewood
Crane Island Historic District
Peter Gideon Farmhouse 24590 Glen Rd, (1854) site of
horticultural experiments
Howard's Point — the last area Indian Settlement (1911)
Spring Park
-792-
• Tonka Toys Headquarter Bldg. and Tower
• Henn. Co. Water Patrol
g Casco Point Commons
® Spring Park Elementary School, 4349 Warren Ave (1906) now City
Hall
• St. Bonifacius
m St. Bonifacius Public Library
• Tonka Beach
• The Narrows Channel (1883)
• The Narrows Bridge (1910)
• Wayzata
• Wayzata Train Depot (Great Northern), 402 Lake St E
• Wayzata Post Office, 229 Minnetonka Ave S. (1941)
• Wayzata Congregational Church, 605 Rice St (1916) now the
Unitarian church
• Meyer Bros, Dairy, 105 Lake St E. (1941)
Old Drug Store, 275 Lake St E. (1920)
Wayzata State Bank Bldg., 305 Lake St E, (1922)
® Kallestad Building, 401 Lake St E. (1875)
Wayzata Country Club
Locust Hills Barn, 500 Bushaway Rd
o Woodland
Gillette Stone Arch on Stone Arch Rd off 101 & Breezy Point Rd
(1912)
Groveland Methodist Assembly Grounds (1909)
Breezy Point, formerly Spirit Knob, a Dakota Indian Sacred Site
Historical Societies
• Carver County Historical Society
• Excelsior
• Lake Minnetonka
• Minnetonka, 14600 Mtka Blvd
• Wayzata
• Westonka
Chambers of Commerce
w Excelsior
0 Lake Minnetonka Area (2323 Commerce Blvd, Mound)
e Wayzata
Parks and Preserves
o Baker Park Reserve
• Carver Park Reserve
c Lowry Nature Center
• Gale Woods
• Noerenberg Memorial Park
• Minnesota Landscape Arboretum
-793-
Island Preserves
• Big Island
• Crane Island (National Historical Places)
• Wawatasso Island
• Wild Goose Chase Island
Trails
o Luce Line Trail
o Dakota Trail (also called Hennepin Co. Regional Rail Authority (HCRRA))
o Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail (also called Hennepin Co. Regional
Rail Authority (HCRRA))
.m
Scenic Byway Reference Materials
1) From MnDOT Scenic Byway Pro¢ram
The link I have provided below has been of help for other byways that were in the beginning
stages of a byway. This tool was developed by the FHWA for training purposes.
h_ptt • / /www byEa sl0I.org/bywaysl01/
BYWAY GROUPS
Over the course of the history of the Program, it has become clear that the success of many
byways is a function of the amount of activity and level of management within the local byway
groups. Therefore the quality of individual byway experiences and the quality of the collection as
a whole is related to the success of local byway groups. A strong byway group may include,
citizens, CVB's, Local Units of Governments etc.
OPTIONAL FRAMEWORK
The oversight of the byway is provided by the strong leadership within your byway group. The
time commitment is entirely up to the group as to how frequent they would like to meet. In
regards to cost -this is a grassroots group. However, if Local Units of Government or CVB's etc.
wish to participate in the byway group, it would be up to them if it is paid or unpaid.
INTRINSIC VALUES
The presentation that was left for your use in presenting to the communities, explains the
intrinsic qualities. You need only one to be considered for state byway designation.
STATE DESIGNATION
I sent Bryan Gadow the "King of Trails Scenic Byway" application. The application shows the
information needed to become a state scenic byway. The Scenic Byway Commission will
review your submitted application. The applicant will be officially informed by letter of the
Scenic Byway Commissions decision to designate. I will also let you know verbally, prior to
receiving the official letter. I may call to request further information or clarification if needed.
Solicitations for National designation are not an option at this time. The Federal Highway
Administration will notify the Scenic Byway Coordinators when they have a solicitation for
national designation.
STATE AID STANDARDS
The State Aid Standards apply if the byway is on a CSAH. Lynnette Roshell, from our Office of
State Aid will answer those questions if needed.
-795-
ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES
Legacy funding, Explore MN, are a couple of suggestions. The Minnetonka Byway group is free
to brainstorm on any other funding sources they may be able to obtain.
ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT
Annually, I will ask the byways to provide me with an "Annual Activity Report." You can
provide this to me in a simple letter format.
Attached is the Memorandum of Understanding for the Scenic Byway Commission as requested
by Debra.
I hope I answered all you questions. Contact me at any time.
Holly M. Slagle
Scenic Byway Program Coordinator
Office of Environmental Stewardship
651- 366 -3623
2) Scenic Byway benefits — From WI DOT Scenic Byway Program
Benefits of Scenic Byway designation include:
• Supports tourism and economic development in communities all along a designated
byway.
• Unique signs, markers, brochures and ongoing promotional efforts can enhance a
community's "marketability.
• State Scenic Byways can potentially be designated a National Scenic Byway or All —
American Road. Such byways are marketed to national and international travelers,
bringing additional recognition and potential economic benefits to area communities.
• Both state or nationally—designated scenic byways may be eligible for grants or funding
• Promotes partnerships between local governments, businesses, civic groups and
community leaders.
• Strengthens civic pride, and makes communities an even more attractive place to live and
work.
• Serves to promote an area's scenic, historical and recreational qualities.
-796-
m R
t
`a
1�f
tom;
lam•
2
im
i%
ia,
-797-
•
w_
04
� .
#)
#)
� \
�}
t w
sm
I�
(W
!W4
a
�rJ
Y
V
p3H
1a"y'V
4r'
W^I
Vt S4
j X
-799-
ao
ysi>
�
aw
�}
�en+l
7•w
c
I�
(W
!W4
a
�rJ
Y
V
p3H
1a"y'V
4r'
W^I
Vt S4
j X
-799-
r
�
?�
�
� {
� ¥
?�
� \
q
g
g
q
g
R
(Y)
C4
eq
rq
V1.
�
:
IM
k
R
All
an
Ln
ccS
0
0
�
L-
v
cn
0
®
N
L
p
v9
>
L
rz
®
®
d
v
O
w
ut
--
—
0
>
V
0
0�
�a�p
A,
AI
All
■
� \
? \
� f
�d t
} #
/ »
t «
�
■
� #
\ �
\ �
# /
4:
■: �
� z
« �
MN
m
:
It
ft
2 .
• /
\�
_
:
B
�
\
�
f
'
#
<
m
:
It
ft
2 .
• /
\�
_
:
B
0
O
0
Ln
(A
cl
(V
c
0
rz
CO
cn
�
: \
m
I
� I
a Now
a mom
m Now
«7
� \
�
q
c
&
�
V)
E
/
2
�
&
©
V)
2
/
E
E
Ln
&
c
@
o
®
2
CL
g
&
&
q
4-5
c
?
/
./
2
.E
a
q
Q
4-1
�
CL
2
4
$
bas
q_
m
4-J
L
>
�
Q
Cl
0
.0
0
�
8
+J
®
cn
cn
0
�_
�mm
�
a�
®
to
v_
C)
Ln
0
_
_
K slow
0
N
(V
0
ru
I&
A,
tr
0 mom
DROMMAMM
J
f6
C
i
w
R
U
6
L!.
63
N
a
d3
m
N
p ,
m
R
w
S
a
Q
a.
Q
a�
m.
a
M
m
ems+
:7
i I
0
N
.i
V
N
O
N
t
ei
ief
D
M
1
C5
N
N
H
p
N
w
w,
a
N
w1
!�5
N
O
H
m
C
N
N
T
Kandis Hanson
Subject: FW: SCENIC BYWAY FOLLOW UP
Subject: SCENIC BYWAY FOLLOW UP
Dear scenic byway attendee,
I wanted to add my thanks to you for attending the subject meeting yesterday. I know you had
to carve valuable time out of your day to participate. Thank you for going to that trouble. I
think /hope we accomplished our objective of introducing the topic and sharing official
explanations of what a scenic byway is, and as importantly, what it isn't.
By now you should have received the powerpoint presentations that Bryan Gadow sent out
this morning. I hope that helps as you continue considering whether this might work for your
community.
Yesterday's meeting was just a first step. I know we didn't address all of the questions you may
have, and others will certainly come up as well. In my opinion the scenic byway tool could be a
powerful opportunity for all of our cities. It would provide a platform for highlighting and
protecting our valued history and natural resources. It would also engage residents and
visitors and direct them to amenities they might enjoy in each city.
As Minnetonka Mayor Schneider said, there are still lots of questions. If I can be of any help as
you and we sort through this, please don't hesitate to contact me. Again, what we would be
hoping for by June 1 is a resolution that your city wants to continue the dialogue that could
lead ultimately to a byway application and designation.
Thank you again.
Best regards,
Ken Willcox
Mayor
City of Wayzata
-811-
1
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A FEASIBLITY STUDY FOR A LAKE
MINNETONKA SCENIC BYWAY CONCEPT
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has a scenic byway system with twenty one (2 1) designated
state scenic byways, but none of the roads around Lake Minnetonka are included in a state scenic
byway; and
WHEREAS, the designation of a state scenic byway route imposes no financial or legal
requirements on the participating jurisdictions, except the individual marketing and branding
efforts determined by each jurisdiction, and that no new billboards are allowed along the route;
and
WHEREAS, participating communities within a designed scenic byway may apply for funding
through the Federal Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) for eligible activities such as on-
road and off -road trail facilities, historic preservation and rehabilitation efforts, and
environmental mitigation, with a local match of twenty percent (20 %); and
WHEREAS, there are fourteen (14) Lake Minnetonka area communities (City of Minnetonka
Beach, City of Woodland, City of Deephaven, City of Tonka Bay, City of Minnetrista, City of
Excelsior, City of Mound, City of Greenwood, City of Victoria, City of Spring Park, City of
Minnetonka, City of Shorewood, City of Wayzata, and City of Orono; and
WHEREAS, representatives from some of the fourteen (14) Lake Minnetonka area
communities, Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MNDOT) Office of Scenic Byway
Programs, Three Rivers Park District, Hennepin County, and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District (MCWD) met on February 24, 2014 to initiate a discussion and a fact finding effort on
the potential of a Lake Minnetonka area state scenic byway; and
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the February 24, 2014 meeting, the attendees agreed to bring
forward a discussion of the Lake Minnetonka area scenic byway concept to their respective cities
and jurisdictions to determine if there was support for pursuing the initiative further; and
WHEREAS, the attendees agreed to provide a response from their jurisdiction by June 1, 2014
on whether or not their jurisdiction was interested in further study of the feasibility of the Lake
Minnetonka area state scenic byway; and
WHEREAS, this response on further studying the feasibility of the state level scenic byway
concept does not formally commit a jurisdiction to a potential state -level scenic byway
application at this time; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the City Council supports the further study of the feasibility of the Lake
Minnetonka area state scenic byway concept; and
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVER, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota that the
City Council recommends that a stewardship group of interested members from the above listed
jurisdictions be created to further study the feasibility of the Lake Minnetonka area state scenic
byway, and report back to all interested jurisdictions periodically with their findings.
Adopted by the City Council this 22 "a day of April, 2014.
ATTEST:
Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Mayor
1.10
m
F'A'hmgsa'�'s
April 17, 2014
. �►
Consulting Engineers & Surveyors
2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172
Phone (952) 448 -8838 - Fax (952) 448 -8805
www.bolton- menk.com
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE; 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements
City Project Nos, PW- 14 -01, PW- 14 -02, PW -14 -08
Reject Bid and Authorize Rebid - Three Points Boulevard
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
t.
At the February 25, 2014 Council meeting, Resolution No. 14 -19 was passed approving plans and specifications
and ordering advertisement for bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Project — Three Points
Boulevard. Bids were received on April V and only one bid was received, that being from GMH Asphalt, Inc in
the amount of $4,623,953.85. This bid amount is approximately 30% above the cost estimates for the project. We
are recommending this bid be rejected.
Since receiving the project bid, we have been working to understand the factors that led to the higher than
anticipated bid price. Essentially, we have concluded there are four primary factors involved as follows:
1. The bidding climate is continuing to change with the trend being toward generally higher pricing as the
economy continues to improve.
2. The affects of having to include Prevailing Wage provisions for all aspects of the project due to the
requirements of Municipal State Aid (MSA).
3. The construction challenges associated with both the length and access needs of Three Points Boulevard
coupled with the complexities of the utility construction in this area.
4. The originally specified construction time frame of one construction season.
After evaluating the factors outlined above, we, along with City Staff have concluded there are more cost efficient
ways to package the needed improvements from a bidding and contracting perspective. In addition, we are
proposing to complete the overall project work over a period of two construction seasons versus one to provide
more relaxed project schedules. Finally, we have also evaluated the improvements themselves for ways to reduce
the project cost through reducing some of the proposed project work to the extent we feel possible. A summary of
the recommended approach to these items is as follows:
DESIGNING FOR A B- 814_TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer
April 17, 2014
Page 2
Contracting and Construction Schedule Items:
• Split Three Points Boulevard at Avocet Lane and repackage the improvements on Three Points Boulevard
generally into "East" and "West" improvement packages.
• Develop four separate bid packages, as shown on the attached Figure No. 1, to complete the required
improvements over 2 -years as follows:
• Project I: Bid the East Three Points Boulevard improvements in May /June as non -MSA for
summer and fall 2014 construction with substantial completion by November of 2014.
• Pro eet 2: Bid the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain improvements as a separate project in
May /June for completion by fall of 2014.
• Bid the West Three Points Boulevard improvements as two separate projects as follows:
• Project 3: Bid by October of 2014 as a non -MSA Utility project to be completed by mid-
summer of 2015.
• Project 4. Bid early 2015 as a MSA Street improvement project to be completed by fall of
2015.
By separating the projects as identified above, only the MSA street improvement project of the West Three
Points Boulevard project (Project 4) will be subject to Prevailing Wage and other MSA provisions.
Improvement Scope 1ilod3t?cadons:
• Divide the work into less complex projects and provide longer construction time frames.
• Bid the West Three Points Boulevard project (Project 3) utilizing `Venchless" techniques to minimize the
traffic control costs for the Three Points area.
• Remove the Commerce Boulevard forcemain improvement from the Three Points Boulevard project and
plan on utilizing trenchless rehabilitation techniques on this pipe in the future.
Based on the above, resolutions have been prepared for your consideration as follows:
L Rejecting bid -2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project —Three Points Boulevard
2. Ordering preparation of bid documents and advertisement for bids for the East Three Points Boulevard
project (Project 1). This project will be bid no later than June 2014.
3. Ordering preparation of bid documents and advertisement for bids for the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain
project (Project 2). This project will be bid no later than June 2014.
4. Ordering preparation of bid documents and advertisement for bids for the West Three Points Utility project
(Project 3). This project will be bid by October 2014.
5. Ordering preparation of bid documents and advertisement for bids for the West Three Points Street project
(Project 4). This project will be bid early 2015.
Sincerely,
BOLTON & MEW WC.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
Mound City Engineer
no
PROJECT 3 . SPRING/SUMMER 2015
PROJECT 4 - SUMMER/FALL 2015
1
2014
LEGEND:
PROJECT 1: EAST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD
PROJ ECT 2: BA RTLETT WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT 3: WEST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD UTI UTY
®
PROJECi<: WEST THREE POI NITS 80ULEVAflO STHEAI
PROJECT 2 • SUMMER /FALL 2014
E301-.T®i-4 & Iuir=-NK, INC.
Consulting Engineers & Surveyors
MANOTu MN PAIPMONT,MN SLEE�YEYE,MN BURNSVIiIE,MN
WILLMA0. AN CHASKA, MN RAMSEY. MN MAPLEWOOD, MN
..TER, MN RODIEFEP,MN AMES,A 5PENCER, IA
PROJECTAREA.DWG
i
m
U
i
C
o
uo
500
SrALE
FEET
CITY OF MOUND
STREET RECONSTRUCTION
PROJECT AREAS
APRIL 2014
FIGURE NO.1
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
RESOLUTION REJECTING BID FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — THREE POINTS BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14 -19 adopted by the City Council the 251" day of February, 2014, fixed a
date for the receipt of bids for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Three
Points Boulevard from Commerce Boulevard to the east end; and
WHEREAS, the bid date was set for April 1, 2014 and the advertisement for bids upon making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications was published in the official paper (Mound
Laker) and the Finance and Commerce journal three weeks prior to the receipt of bids; and
WHEREAS, there was only one bid received, that being from GMH Asphalt, Inc., Chaska, MN; and
WHEREAS, the instructions to bidders for the Project and the bid specifications explicitly provide that
the City reserves the right to reject any or all bids; and
WHEREAS, the bid amount, including the "add" alternate Bartlett Watermain Improvements, of
$4,623,953.85 was approximately 30% (percent) above the engineer's cost estimate; and
WHEREAS, rejecting the only bid received from GMH Asphalt, Inc. that was approximately 30% above
the engineer's estimate is in the best interests of the City of Mound;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, that the bid submitted
by GMH Asphalt, Inc. for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project be rejected
and the bid bond returned.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
Mayor Mark Hanus
-817-
1
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — EAST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, Resolution 14 -19 approved the plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and
Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard and these plans and specifications can
be split out into separate projects, with minor modifications; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14- adopted by the City Council the 22nd day of April, 2014, rejected the
one bid received on April 151 for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project -
Three Points Boulevard from Commerce Boulevard to the east end; and
WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the project's utility construction, difficult access and length of the
approved project, more contractor interest can be generated by splitting the project into two more
manageable sections; and
WHEREAS, the approved project will be split at Avocet Lane into an East Three Points Boulevard
project and a West Three Points Boulevard project;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota:
1. The approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement
Project will be split into two separate projects and bid documents at the intersection of Avocet Lane/
Three Points Boulevard and these two projects will be referred to as the East Three Points
Boulevard Project and the West Three Points Boulevard Project.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids
upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications for the 2014
Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — East Three Points Boulevard. The
advertisement shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids
will be received by the City Clerk at which time they will be publically opened in a designated room
within City Hall, 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated and
will be considered by the City Council at their next city council meeting in the council chambers.
Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an
opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless
sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or
certified check payable to the clerk for 5% of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
Mayor Mark Hanus
im
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE BARTLETT BOULEVARD WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT, LOST LAKE BRIDGE TO WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14 -20 adopted by the City Council the 251" day of February, 2014,
authorized the preparation of plans and specifications and the advertisement for bids of the Bartlett
Boulevard Watermain Improvement Project as an optional addition to the 2014 Street, Utility and
Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Three Points Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14 -( ) adopted by the City Council on April 22, 2014, rejected the bid
submitted for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Three Points
Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to bid this project as a separate project at this time due
to the severe deterioration of the existing watermain and the anticipated mill and overlay improvement
to County Road 125 by Hennepin County sometime within approximately two years;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota:
The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids
upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications for the
Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvement Project, Lost Lake Bridge to Wilshire Boulevard. The
advertisement shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids
will be received by the City Clerk at which time they will be pubiically opened in a designated room
within City Hall, 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated and
will be considered by the City Council at their next city council meeting in the council chambers.
Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an
opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless
sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or
certified check payable to the clerk for 5% of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
Mayor Mark Hanus
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR
BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — WEST THREE
POINTS BOULEVARD STREET AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, Resolution 14 -19 approved the plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining
Wall Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard and these plans and specifications can be split out into
separate projects, with minor modifications; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14 -( ) adopted by the City Council the 22nd day of April, 2014, rejected the one bid
received on April 1st for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Three Points Boulevard
from Commerce Boulevard to the east end; and
WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the project's utility construction, difficult access and length of the approved
project, more contractor interest can be generated by splitting the project into two more manageable sections; and
WHEREAS, the approved project will be split at Avocet Lane into an East Three Points Boulevard project and a
West Three Points Boulevard project; and
WHEREAS, the necessary street and retaining wall improvements in the West Three Points Boulevard project
can be more cost effectively constructed as a separate MSA improvement project; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota
1. The approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project will
be split into two separate projects and bid documents at the intersection of Avocet Lane/ Three Points
Boulevard and these two projects will be referred to as the East Three Points Boulevard Project and the West
Three Points Boulevard Project.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the
making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and
Retaining Wall Improvement Project — West Three Points Boulevard Street and Retaining Wall Improvement
Project. The advertisement shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that
bids will be received by the City Clerk at which time they will be publically opened in a designated room within
City Hall, 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be
considered by the City Council at their next city council meeting in the council chambers. Any bidder whose
responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council
on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and
accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 5% of the
amount of such bid.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
Mayor Mark Hanus
820 -
1
• : 0 !*
• a
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR
BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — WEST THREE
POINTS BOULEVARD -- Aii IMPROVEMENTS
U -T I L- s T-A
WHEREAS, Resolution 14 -19 approved the plans ana`sp6—Ri icatlons for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining
Wall Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard and these plans and specifications can be split out into
separate projects, with minor modifications; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14- adopted by the City Council the 22nd day of April, 2014, rejected the one bid
received on April 16t for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Three Points Boulevard
from Commerce Boulevard to the east end; and
WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the project's utility construction, difficult access and length of the approved
project, more contractor interest can be generated by splitting the project into two more manageable sections; and
WHEREAS, the approved project will be split at Avocet Lane into an East Three Points Boulevard project and a
West Three Points Boulevard project; and
WHEREAS, the necessary street and retaining wall improvements in the West Three Points Boulevard project
can be more cost effectively constructed as a separate MSA improvement project; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota:
1. The approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project will
be split into two separate projects and bid documents at the intersection of Avocet Lane/ Three Points
Boulevard and these two projects will be referred to as the East Three Points Boulevard Project and the West
Three Points Boulevard Project.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the
making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and
Retaining Wall Improvement Project — WWTbree.Polnt �ouleyard Utility Improvement Project. The
advertisement shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be
received by the City Clerk at which time they will be publically opened in a designated room within City Hall,
2415 Wilshire Boulevard, by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be considered by the
City Council at their next city council meeting in the council chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is
questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of
responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash
deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 5% of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2014.
Mayor Mark Hanus
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
REPLACEMENT PAGE - 821 —
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO, 14-
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR
BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — WEST THREE
POINTS BOULEVARD STREET AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, Resolution 14 -19 approved the plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining
Wall Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard and these plans and specifications can be split out into
separate projects, with minor modifications; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 14- adopted by the City Council the 22nd day of April, 2014, rejected the one bid
received on April 1s' for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Three Points Boulevard
from Commerce Boulevard to the east end; and
WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the project's utility construction, difficult access and length of the approved
project, more contractor interest can be generated by splitting the project into two more manageable sections; and
WHEREAS, the approved project will be split at Avocet Lane into an East Three Points Boulevard project and a
West Three Points Boulevard project; and
WHEREAS, the necessary street and retaining wall improvements in the West Three Points Boulevard project
can be more cost effectively constructed as a separate MSA improvement project; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota:
1. The approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project will
be split into two separate projects and bid documents at the intersection of Avocet Lane/ Three Points
Boulevard and these two projects will be referred to as the East Three Points Boulevard Project and the West
Three Points Boulevard Project.
The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the
making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications for the 2014 Street, Utility and
Retaining Wall Improvement Project — West Three Points Boulevard Utility Improvement Project. The
advertisement shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be
received by the City Clerk at which time they will be publically opened in a designated room within City Hall,
2415 Wilshire Boulevard, by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be considered by the
City Council at their next city council meeting in the council chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is
questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of
responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash
deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 5% of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
Mayor Mark Hanus
-821-
1
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472 -0604
Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director
Date: April 17, 2014
Re: Action on Resolution Denying Board of Appeals and Adjustment Request from
Allison Sisk Regarding the Keeping of Alpacas at 6221 Westedge Boulevard
Summary. At its April 8, 2014 meeting, the City Council reviewed the Board of Appeals and
Adjustment request from Allison Sisk that the keeping of (4) alpacas at her property at 6221 Westedge
Boulevard should be allowed as they are companion animals similar to a pet dog. The City Council
voted, 3 in favor and 2 opposed , to direct Staff to prepare a resolution denying the appeals request
based on the City Council's reasons as discussed at the April 8`" meeting. A draft resolution has been
prepared for consideration and action. Staff recommends approval.
-822-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
RESOLUTION TO DENY BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
FROM ALLISON SISK REGARDING THE KEEPING OF ALPACAS AT 6221
WESTEDGE BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, the City received a report of llamas being kept at 6221 Westedge
Boulevard. A site inspection was done by the Community Service Officer who
confirmed there were alpacas present on the property; and
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2013, the applicant, Allison Sisk, was notified by letter,
that the keeping of alpacas at the property at 6221 Westedge Boulevard was not
allowed under the provisions contained in City Code Section. 14.2. The letter also
provided information about City Code Section 129 -32 (Appeals to the Board of
Adjustment and Appeals) and appealing Staffs interpretation of the City Code; and
WHEREAS, the applicant, on December 28, 2013, submitted a request in accordance
with City Code Section. 129 -32 (Appeals to the Board of Appeals and Adjustments).
Information from the applicant indicates there are four (4) neutered, male, alpacas
presently on the property. She asserts that the keeping of alpacas at 6221 Westedge
Boulevard should be allowed as they are companion animals and similar to a pet dog;
and
WHEREAS, the property located at 6221 Westedge Boulevard is zoned R -1 Single
Family Residential and subject to the regulations contained in City Code Section 129-
100; and
WHEREAS, the applicant's request was reviewed and processed pursuant to City Code
Section 129 -32 (Appeals to the Board of Appeals and Adjustment); and
WHEREAS, while the request is not for an interpretation of the zoning map or the
regulations contained in City Code Section 129, the process contained in City Code
Section 129 -32 was used as there are zoning and land use implications related to the
use including, but not limited to, whether the keeping of alpacas is allowed in a
residential district and compatibility and impacts of the keeping of alpacas upon
adjacent uses; and
WHEREAS, as set forth in City Code Section 129 -32, the Board of Appeals and
Adjustment is the City Council; and
WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -32 requires review of all appeals by the Planning
Commission prior to review by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, information regarding the request is included in the Staff Memorandum
dated February 28, 2014 and the applicant's submitted materials; and
-823-
WHEREAS, based on its review of the regulations contained in the City Code and the
applicant's request, Staff's conclusions were as follows:
The keeping of alpacas is not listed as a permitted, conditional or accessory use
in the R -1 zoning district as described in City Code Section 129 -99 Allowable
uses (residential districts).
2. The keeping of alpacas is not allowed under the provisions contained in City
Code Section 14 -2 of the City Code.
Staff finds the alpacas to be similar to animals commonly found on a farm, such
as cattle, horses, pigs, sheep or goats.
4. The keeping of alpacas is not allowed in any of Mound's residential zoning
districts according to City Code Section 14 and City Code Section 129 with the
exception of animals that were kept upon a premises prior to May 19, 1960 and
then only the same or lesser number of such animals that existed at the time;
and
WHEREAS, the request was considered by the Planning Commission at its March 4,
2014 meeting; and
WHEREAS, based on its review, the Planning Commission voted to recommend the
City Council acknowledge Staff's conclusion that the current regulations do not allow for
the keeping of alpacas but further recommended to the Council that the City's
regulations be changed to allow for alpacas to be kept as pets as the Planning
Commission viewed alpacas, in this context, to be similar to a companion animal as
opposed to being livestock; and
WHEREAS, the request was reviewed by the City Council at its April 8, 2014
meeting and on the question of whether the City Code allows for the keeping of alpacas
in the City of Mound, the City Council, acting as the Board of Appeals and Adjustment,
voted three (3) in favor and two (2) opposed, and further directed Staff to prepare a
resolution denying the appeals request based on information and reasons from the
City's Council discussion that will be brought back to the next meeting for
consideration; and
WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the submitted appeals request was made
within the timeframe established in Minnesota Statutes 15.99.
MOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, to deny the appeal to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, from Allison
Sisk and find that the keeping of alpacas is not allowed under the regulations contained
in the City Code. In denying the Board of Adjustment and Appeals request,the City
Council hereby makes the following findings:
Both Staff and the Planning Commission's evaluation of the request was that
alpacas are not allowed under the Citv Code.
-824-
2. Alpacas are not permitted under Chapter 14 of the City Code.
3. Alpacas are not permitted in the R -1 zoning district or any zoning district in
Mound.
4. Alpacas are similar to animals commonly found on a farm, such as cattle,
horses, pigs, sheep or goats. Farm animals are not permitted in the City of
Mound.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of April, 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
-825-
Mayor Mark Hanus
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
(952 )472 -0604
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant
DATE: April 15, 2014
SUBJECT: Urban Agriculture Study— Chicken and Bee Keeping
Summary
At its February 25, 2014 meeting, the City Council discussed the potential for allowing chickens
and bees in residential districts. The discussion was prompted by residential interest and was a
work program task of the Planning Commission in 2013. While the City Council determined that
beekeeping was not appropriate for the community at this time, it did request additional
information be provided at an upcoming meeting regarding the keeping of chickens.
Staff contacted a number of communities which allow chickens through a permitting process
including Anoka, Eagan, West St. Paul, Norwood Young America, and Rosemount. In general,
the communities indicated that the keeping of chickens does not generate a lot of complaints.
Some noted that there were more issues before there were regulations than after. One
community stated that they found a number of people that were interested in chickens did not
pursue permits for chickens once they participated in a mandatory class , which is a licensing
requirement, and better understood what was involved in raising chickens.
In addition to researching other communities' experiences, Staff has explored further how
potential regulations would impact the ability of property owners to have chickens. The
attached diagram was developed to explore whether there would be sufficient room for
chickens if minimum coop setback requirements were established. The diagram was created
for the minimum 6,000 square foot lot in the R -1A and R -2 districts assuming that the larger
the property the easier it would be to place a coop. The diagram assumes coops will not be
allowed in the yard setback areas. It also includes a 20 and 25 foot setback from residential
structures on adjacent properties. Option 1 is assuming a lot of record, while Option 2 is
assuming a standard lot. The diagrams indicate that the larger issue for property owners will
likely be impervious surface requirements rather than setback requirements.
Staff was also able to obtain a GIS file showing approximate building footprints. Please note
that the data was collected from aerial imagery and so is not completely accurate for individual
properties. However, it does provide another way of exploring the impact of setback
regulations on the ability of residential properties to have chickens. The attached maps were
created for sample neighborhoods in Three Points and on the Island. The maps show the
amount of land that may be available to property owners if the City were to require a 25 foot
coop setback from residential structures on adjacent property and a 50 foot setback from any
public waters or wetlands. Additional maps from other neighborhoods in the City will be
available at the meeting. The maps generally show that there still will be space available should
coops be required to be placed at least 25 feet from residential buildings on adjacent
properties. It should be noted that if setbacks from property lines are included in the
regulations, the available area will be reduced from what is shown on the maps.
Additional Information
Staff was contacted by Tom Stokes on March 16th who advised that he has had chickens on his
property for several years and would like the City Council to know that he is in favor of
changing the regulations. A copy of his email has been included as an attachment. Staff also
received a call from another resident, following the February 25th City Council meeting, who
expressed support for allowing chickens in Mound.
F-J'.A
I
i
.' MUM .•v.
----- - - - ---
'
---- - - - - -- ----
o
III III
- - - - --
II
i t i I
i t
101
must
h6 ing..
z�
mes
I
I
i
I
I
i I
i
i
Standard Lot Analysis
Lot Area: 6,,000 sf
'total Allowed Impervious (30 %): 1,800 Sf
House Footprint
(including 18'x22'garage): 1,300 Sf
Driveway: 400 Sf
Walkway: 90 Sf
Availiable Impervious Space
for a Stationary Coop: 10 Sf
Option 2:
Wide Standard Lot
&
k
\.
/ / { \f!
2 /,
/
{\) \kf` /` ƒ {\
)�
k
z
� e
®
U
—co
ICLO
� v
W
� NF
z
Sarah Smith
From: Sarah Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 12:23 PM
To: Sarah Smith
Attachments: photo.JPG; ATT00001.txt
- - - -- Original Message--- -
From: Thomas Stokes [mailto:tstokesll@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:23 AM
To: Sarah Smith
Subject: Chickens
Sara ,
I read the article in the laker concerning chickens . I must tell you that I have had
chickens for several years in mound . Please see the attached photo of my coupe .
I would suggest that the staff and council review a modern urban chicken coupe . Mine has
automated heated watering system ,Semi automated feeders, skylights, automated chicken door
and heat .
Chickens make great pets and all have there own personality . They make a fraction of the
noise and disturbance of my neighbors dogs . In fact I don't think most of my neighbors know
I even have them . Those that do love them. If attended properly they have very little sent
and there waste make great compost.
My chickens supply eggs for 4 family's in our community . I could go on and on about the
benefits of fresh eggs. The city of Minneapolis has much smaller yards and I know a number of
people who have chickens . The idea that a large yard is required is just not true.
I would welcome the staff and council to visit my coupe . I do believe that some limpets
should be put on them such as no roosters and I would be happy to share my ideas .
Thomas Stokes
-831-
1
F
k
y
+MV"v
.k �:
-,
,e
t
..
q
M�. as
�
�
x
..
a.i9 •�VI(
�.
�
..
,. tq �
a' >
�...
1 )
�. j1 �
��� ;
}♦
�....
'%
s�
i :` i
' . ,�
i'
��
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472 -0604
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO: City Council
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant
DATE: April 16, 2014
SUBJECT: Thrive MSP 2040 Projections
As required by state statutes every 10 years, the Metropolitan Council is preparing its 2040
long -range plan, called Thrive MSP 2040. The vision, outcomes, and principles identified in this
plan will drive the development of the Council's Transportation, Water Resources, Regional
Parks, and Housing Policy Plans. These plans, to be released in late 2014 and early 2015, will
establish the requirements Mound must meet in its next update of its Comprehensive Plan
anticipated to be due in 2018.
The entire 130 -page draft document is available on the Metropolitan Council's website at
http: / /www.metrocouncii .ore /Planning /Projects /Thrive- 2040.aspx. The attached Table of
Contents provides a good overview of the outcomes and principles of Thrive MSP 2040. The
five outcomes (the "why ") identified are stewardship, prosperity, equity, livability, and
sustainability, while the three principles (the "how ") identified are integration, collaboration,
and accountability.
in Thrive MSP 2040 the Metropolitan Council has further classified "Developed Areas" of the
Twin Cities into urban centers, urban, suburban, and suburban edge. Mound has been placed
in the suburban designation. The attached materials show how communities have been
classified, how the Metropolitan Council describes the suburban designation, and the types of
strategies anticipated for suburban communities.
Of particular note in the identified list of suburban strategies is the requirement to plan for
forecasted population and household growth at overall average densities of at least 5 units per
area with targeted opportunities for more intensive development near regional transit
investments. In the 2030 Regional Development Framework, the overall residential density
minimum was 3 to 5 units per acre. Using the average lot sizes identified through the urban
agriculture analysis earlier this year, the R -1 zoning district has an existing density of about 2.7
units per acre while the R -1A and R -2 zoning districts has about 4.6 units per acre. Using
minimum lot size requirements, the R -1 zoning district would be about 4.4 units per acre and
the R -1A and R -2 zoning districts about 7.3 units per acre. Staff has concerns about the
implications of the requirement for a minimum of 5 units per acre, particularly since the Zoning
Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan must be in conformance with each other.
-833-
In addition to the preliminary Thrive MSP 2040 draft, the Metropolitan Council has also
released population, household, and employment forecasts for individual communities.
Preliminary forecasts for 2040 were first released in the fall of 2013. Like many communities,
City Staff reviewed the forecasts and provided feedback to Metropolitan Council Staff. In
general, the common themes heard from the Metropolitan Council were that the forecasts
were too low for developing communities, while they were too high for developed
communities that had limited land supplies. Based on that feedback, the Metropolitan Council
Forecast Team made the following adjustments to the model:
• Corrected data about residential land consumption rates
• Refreshed projections of regional total households, population, and average household
sizes, reducing the overall growth in households across the region
• Revised development costs to include land values and increased costs of development
• Stricter tracking of developed and available land supplies
• Stricter definition of maximum land use capacities, in both rural and urban areas
• Consideration of recent platting activity to identify current growth areas
The table below summarizes the revised 2040 preliminary forecast for the City of Mound. For
comparison purposes, the forecasts for 2020 and 2030 from the Regional Development
Framework, which were incorporated into the last Comprehensive Plan, have been included.
While it is helpful to know the anticipated increase from 2010, Staff has been primarily focused
on the differences between the 2030 and 2040 forecasts, as it is this difference that will need
to be accommodated in future land use plans in the next update of the City's Comprehensive
Plan. Due the a continued reduction in the number of people per household, the City will need
to plan for 200 additional households even though the projected number of people has been
reduced by 400.
As a primarily developed community the City of Mound must use redevelopment as a means to
increase the number of households. In the City's 2010 Comprehensive Plan, household growth
was projected to occur in the low density residential, medium density residential, pedestrian,
destination and linear districts as shown in the table below. The total number of units for 2030
was projected to be accommodated through growth in these areas.
From 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Table 4.4 Anticipated Household Growth
To accommodate the additional 200 units through 2040 the City will either need to increase
the densities proposed for these districts or identify existing low or medium density residential
neighborhoods for redevelopment to higher densities. To accommodate 200 additional units,
the City would need to identify more than 28 acres of land at 7 units per acre, 16 acres of land
at 12 units per acre, and 10 acres of land at 20 units per acre.
Given the level of redevelopment already identified in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, City Staff
has concerns about the ability to accommodate an additional 200 households in its 2040
Comprehensive Plan. Thus, City Staff recommends that the City send the attached letter to the
Metropolitan Council to be included as part of the draft review process which concludes on
April 28`h.
-835-
AThriving Region ....................................................................................... ...............................
i
Continued population and job growth through 2040 ................................. ...............................
1
Changes and challenges that lie ahead for our region ............................. ...............................
2
The opportunity of a regional approach .. .................. .. ...... ...................... . ....._....... ... .......... .....
4
Thrive MSP 2040: Planning a prosperous, equitable, and livable region for today and
generationsto come ................................................................................ ...............................
5
Thrive: Outcomes. .............. .................. ............ ...... ___ .............. ...... ... __ ................
7
Stewardship......._ .................................................................................... ...............................
9
Responsibly managing finite natural resources.... ... .......... ................. ................... .......
9
Pivoting from expanding to maintaining our region's wastewater and highway infrastructure
.............................10
_ .........................................................................................
Leveraging transit infrastructure investments with higher expectations of land use,.. .........
12
Prosperity................................................................................................. .............................13
Fostering the conditions for shared economic vitality by balancing major investments across
theregion .............................................................................................. .............................14
Protecting natural resources that are the foundation of prosperity ......... .............................14
Planning for and investing in infrastructure, amenities and quality of life needed for
economiccompetitiveness .................................................................... .............................15
Encouraging redevelopment and infill development across the region.. .............................18
Equity....................................................................................................... .............................19
Using our influence and investments to build a more equitable region .. .............................20
Expanding choices in where we live and how we travel for all our residents, across age,
race and ethnicity, economic means, and ability ................................... .............................22
Investing in a mix of housing affordability along the region's transit corridors .....................
23
Engaging a full cross - section of the community in decision - making ...... .............................23
Livability................................................................................................... .............................24
Increasing access to nature and outdoor recreation through regional parks and trails .......25
Providing housing and transportation choices for a range of demographic characteristics
andeconomic means ............................................................................ .............................26
Supporting the region's bicycle and pedestrian facilities to promote bicycling for
transportation, recreation and healthy lifestyles ..................................... .............................27
Aligning resources to support transit - oriented development and walkable places ..............28
Sustainability............................................................................................ .............................29
Promoting the wise use of water ........................................................... .............................29
Providing leadership to support climate change mitigation, adaptation and resilience ..... .,.30
Operating wastewater treatment and transit systems sustainably ......... .............................32
Thrive: Principles... .......... - .............. .......... ___ ............. .......... ... __ .... _ ....... ....... .....
_34
Integration................................................................................................ .............................35
Moving beyond organizational silos ....................................................... .............................35
Coordinating effectively with partners and stakeholders... - . .......... ............... ........... .......
.36
Collaboration............................................................................................ .............................37
Being open to shared strategies, supportive partnerships and reciprocal relationships... ...
37
Convening to address complex regional issues .................................... .............................37
Providing additional technical assistance and enhanced information to support local
planning................................................................................................ .............................38
Accountability........................................................................................... .............................41
Adopting a data - driven approach to measure progress ......................... .............................41
Learningfrom indicators.... ............. .......... .... ____ ........... ........................ ........... ...
41
Providing clear, easily accessible information ....................................... .............................42
Deploying the Council's authority .......................................................... .............................42
SpecialFeatures .......................................................................................... .............................43
Applying policies to specific places: Moving beyond one size fits all ........ .............................43
Racially Concentrated Areas of Poverty and Areas of Concentrated Poverty ........................44
Station Areas on Existing and Planned Transitways ................................. .............................45
WaterSupply Considerations.., ..................... _ .................................................. .................. 46
Joband Activity Centers ........................................................................... .............................47
Wastewater Service Areas ....................................................................... .............................48
Regionally Significant Ecological Resources ............................................ .............................49
CommunityDesignations ............................................................................. .............................50
Urban and Rural Service Areas ................................................................ .............................50
Urban Center: Growing vitality in the region's core... ....... ..........................
..... 53
Urban: Redeveloping to meet the needs of new generations .................... .............................54
Suburban: Cultivating places where people can gather ............................ .............................55
Suburban Edge: Managing rapid growth and change ............................... .............................57
Emerging Suburban Edge: Transitioning from rural to developed ............ .............................58
Rural Centers: Serving the rural area as small town centers of commerce ............................60
Diversified Rural: Protecting land for rural lifestyles and long -term urbanization ....................61
Rural Residential: Limiting unsustainable growth patterns ........................ .............................63
Agricultural: Preserving large swaths of farmland ..................................... .............................64
LandUse Policies ........................................................................................ .............................65
Settingthe Stage ...................................................................................... .............................65
LandUse Policies ..................................................................................... .............................66
Orderly and Efficient Land Use ................................................................. .............................67
Natural Resources Protection ................................................................... .............................69
WaterSustainability .................................................................................. .............................72
Housing Affordability and Choice .............................................................. .............................75
Access, Mobility, and Transportation Choice ............................................ .............................77
EconomicCompetitiveness ....... ........................................... ......... .... - ....... ....................
....... 80
Buildingin Resilience.. ... ....................................................................... .............. ...............
81
Strategies for Community Designations ....................................................... .............................85
Urban Center: Growing vitality in the region's core .................................. .............................85
Urban: Redeveloping to meet the needs of new generations ................... .............................90
Suburban: Cultivating places where people can gather ........................... .............................95
Suburban Edge: Managing rapid growth and change .............................. .............................99
Emerging Suburban Edge: Transitioning from rural to developed ........... ............................103
Rural Centers: Serving the rural areas as small town centers of commerce .......................107
Diversified Rural: Protecting land for rural lifestyles and long -term urbanization .................110
Rural Residential: Limiting unsustainable growth patterns ...................... ............................114
Agricultural: Preserving large swaths of farmland .... ............................... ............................117
ImplementingThrive ..................................................... ............................... ............................121
Nextsteps ................................................................ ............................... ............................121
LocalPlanning Process ............................................ ............................... ............................121
TechnicalAssistance ................................................ ............................... ............................122
Sector Representative Program. .... ....................................... .............. ............. _ ... _122
Toolsand Resources ............... ................ ...... ... ........................... .... ................................ 122
Workshops............................................................ ............................... ............................122
PlanningGrants and Loans ................................... ............................... ............................122
Draft Local Forecasts....... ...................... __ _ ...... ... .. ... ...................... ........ 119
-837-
Community Designation Rual Center 10
Urban Center Diversified Rural Mile, �
Jancery 3, 2013
Urban Rural Residential
Suburban fm Agricultural
Suburban Edge Non Region
Emerging Suburban Edge
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Last revised: February 26, 2014 52
-838-
Suburban: a places
where people can gather
Suburban communities saw their primary era of
development in the 1980s and into the early
1990s as the Baby Boomers formed families and
entered their prime earning years. Many of these
cities fall along freeway corridors and include
growth along outside the 1- 694/494 beltway. This
development pattern also reached and
incorporated places that were once resort
destinations connected from the Twin Cities by
streetcar, such as communities along Lake
Minnetonka, White Bear Lake, and the St. Croix
River.
Many of the region's corporate headquarters are —
located in the Suburban Area. These include Thomson Reuters in Eagan, United Health Group
in Minnetonka, and Land O'Lakes in Arden Hills.
Development in Suburban communities occurred at significantly lower densities than in previous
eras. Many residential subdivisions include cul -de -sacs. Retail areas often include big box
stores and multi- tenant retail developments. Because of the automobile- orientation of this area's
development patterns and high automobile ownership, walking or bicycling for daily travel is less
common, but trails are often used for recreation and commuting. Suburban Area cities include
some of the large regional parks such as Bunker Hills Regional Park in Coon Rapids and
Andover, and Lebanon Hills Regional Park in Eagan and Apple Valley. Transit service is
generally less cost - effective in the Suburban communities than in the Urban Center and Urban
communities, but there is demand for express bus service from park- and -rides to regional
destinations.
As the Suburban communities have grown and as market preferences have evolved, many of
these cities are now focusing attention on developing places where people can gather. These
include town centers like downtown Stillwater, Burnsville's Heart of the City, Minnetonka's
Village Center, downtown White Bear Lake, and Apple Valley's downtown. These locations are
intended to be more walkable and include a mix of retail, higher density housing; and civic,
institutional, and open space amenities. They often incorporate suburban transit circulator buses
and park- and -rides for express service to downtown.
Based on the draft forecasts and community designations shown here, the Suburban area
would add approximately 152,000 residents, 72,000 households and 160,000 jobs between
2010 and 2040. This represents growth of 22 percent in population, 27 percent in households
and 45 percent in employment over the three decades. These numbers are approximations,
provided for general illustration only. They will change somewhat during the upcoming fine -
grained comprehensive planning process.
Based on the draft forecasts and community designations shown here, the Suburban area will
add 152,000 residents, 72,000 households and 160,000 jobs between 2010 and 2040. This
represents growth of 22 percent in population, 27 percent in households and 45 percent in
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Last revised: February 26, 2014
611
employment over the three decades. These numbers are approximations, provided for general
illustration only, and may change during the upcoming comprehensive planning process.
Designated Suburban communities are: Apple Valley, Arden Hills, Bayport, Birchwood Village,
Brooklyn Park, Burnsville, Champlin, Circle Pines, Coon Rapids, Deephaven, Eagan, Eden
Prairie, Excelsior, Gem Lake, Greenwood, Landfall, Lexington, Lilydale, Little Canada, Long
Lake, Loretto, Mahtomedi, Maple Plain, Medicine Lake, Mendota, Mendota Heights,
Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Mound, Mounds View, North Oaks *, Oak Park Heights,
Oakdale, Shoreview, Shorewood, Spring Lake Park, Spring Park, St. Bonifacius, Stillwater,
Stillwater Township *, Tonka Bay, Vadnais Heights, Wayzata, White Bear Lake, White Bear
Township, Willernie, and Woodland.
*listed in this designation but also has areas in other designations.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Last revised: February 26, 2014
I
FY's
Suburban: r places where people can gather
Suburban communities saw their primary era of development during the 1980s and early 1990s
as the Baby Boomers formed families and entered their prime earning years. Suburban
Communities also includes places that were once resort destinations connected from the Twin
Cities by streetcar, along Lake Minnetonka, White Bear Lake, and the St. Croix River.
Orderly and Efficient Land Use
Council Role
• Maintain and improve regional infrastructure to support adaptive reuse, infill development,
and redevelopment.
• Support local planning and implementation efforts to target growth in and around regional
transit, as articulated in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan.
• Coordinate regional infrastructure and program funding with other efforts designed to
address racially concentrated areas of poverty.
• Provide technical assistance to communities undertaking planning efforts around job and
activity centers and regional investments.
• Partner with local communities to improve land use patterns to reduce the generation of
carbon emissions.
Community Role
• Plan for forecasted population and household growth at overall average densities of at
least 5 units per acre, and target opportunities for more intensive development near
regional transit investments, at densities and in a manner articulated in the 2040
Transportation Policy Plan.
• Identify areas for redevelopment, particularly areas that are well - served by transportation
options and nearby amenities, and which contribute to better proximity between jobs and
housing. Lead major redevelopment efforts.
• Lead detailed land use planning efforts around regional transit stations, job and activity
centers, and other regional investments.
• Plan for and program local infrastructure needs (e.g., roads, sidewalks, sewer, water,
surface water), including those needed to accommodate future growth and implement
local comprehensive plans.
• Consider the role of railroads in promoting economic activity and identify an adequate
supply of land in comprehensive plans to meet existing and future demand for users
requiring rail access.
Natural Resources Protection
Council Role
• Support the reclamation of lands, including contaminated land, for redevelopment and the
restoration of natural features and function.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Last revised: February 26, 2014 95
-841-
Promote multi -modal access to regional parks, trails and the transit network, where
appropriate. Support the continued development of the regional trail system.
Community Role
• Integrate natural resource conservation and restoration strategies into comprehensive
plan.
• Identify lands for reclamation, including contaminated land, for redevelopment and the
restoration of natural features and functions.
• Integrate natural resources restoration and protection strategies into local development
ordinances.
• Develop programs that encourage the implementation of natural resource conservation
and restoration.
Water Sustainability
Council Role
See Water Sustainability policy discussion in the Land Use Policy introduction.
Community Role
® Implement best management practices to control and treat stormwater as redevelopment
opportunities arise.
Housing Affordability and Choice
Council Role
Re- invest in and expand regional systems to support redevelopment in communities that
partner in the preservation and expansion of housing choices.
Community Role
• Designate land in the comprehensive plan to support household growth forecasts and
address the community's share of the region's affordable housing need through
redevelopment at a range of densities.
• Plan for an adequate supply of affordable housing along regional transitways at station
areas. Address the relationship of local industries to the affordability of housing in the
community.
• Use state, regional, and federal sources of funding and /or financing and development
tools allowed by state law to assist the feasibility of the development of new lifecycle and
affordable housing.
• Develop or use programs to preserve the existing stock of naturally - occurring affordable
housing.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Last revised: February 26, 2014
3.1
Access, Mobility, and Transportation Choice
Council Role
• Ensure that local roadway systems are planned in ways that minimize short trips on the
regional highway system.
• Ensure that local infrastructure and land uses are planned in ways that are consistent
with managing access along the regional highway system and capitalizing on investments
in the regional transit system.
• Invest in transit improvements in corridors that serve existing transit demand and that can
effectively guide a significant level of future growth.
• Ensure that local comprehensive plans guide growth in and around transit stations and
near high - frequency transit services, commensurate with planned levels of transit service
and station typologies identified in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan.
• Provide regional transit services to serve dense corridors and nodes where local
communities are adapting local policies to improve the success of transit.
• Support access to, and the future growth of, regional intermodal freight terminals as
identified in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan.
Community Role
• Develop comprehensive plans that focus growth in and around regional transit stations
and near high- frequency transit services, commensurate with planned levels of transit
service and the station typologies (e.g., land use mix, density levels) identified in the 2040
Transportation Policy Plan.
• Develop local policies, plans, and practices that improve pedestrian and bicycle
circulation, including access to regional transit services, regional trails, and regional
bicycle corridors.
• Seek opportunities to improve local street and pedestrian connections to improve access
for local trips.
• Consider implementation of travel demand management (TDM) policies and ordinances
that encourage use of travel options and decrease reliance on single- occupancy vehicle
travel.
• Engage private sector stakeholders that depend on or are affected by the local
transportation system.
• Adopt development requirements that improve the user experience, circulation, and
access for bicyclists and pedestrians.
• Adopt complete streets policies that improve safety and mobility for all road users.
Economic Competitiveness
Council Role
• Invest in regional amenities and services, including transit, regional parks and trails and
bikeways to support the Suburban area as an attractive place to locate and do business.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Last revised: February 26, 2014
S7
Invest in regional transportation improvements that better connect workers in racially
concentrated areas of poverty with job training and living wage employment.
Community Role
• Identify appropriate areas for business and industrial expansion, considering access by
rail, truck, plane, and barge.
• Support the cleanup and re -use of contaminated land by utilizing regional, county, and
local funding programs and financing tools.
• Preserve, remediate contamination, and re- purpose industrial base for higher intensity
employment and new industries.
• Protect sites for river- and rail - dependent manufacturing and freight transportation needs
from incompatible uses and identify local land supply and transportation needs for
effective use of those sites.
• Plan for land uses where appropriate that support the growth of export- oriented
businesses, important regional economic clusters, and living wage jobs.
• Conduct small area planning efforts to preserve locations for employment, manage
growth, and minimize land use conflicts.
Building in Resilience
Council Role
Invest in regional transportation infrastructure and services that increase the share of
trips made by transit, carpools, and non - motorized means and guide development
patterns that support this.
. Explore developing an urban forestry assistance program.
Community Role
• Identify and address potential vulnerabilities in local infrastructure as a result of increased
frequency and severity of storms and heat waves.
• Participate in federal, state, and local utility programs that incentivize the implementation
of wind and solar power generation.
• Consider making a property assessed clean energy (PACE) program available for
conservation and renewable energy.
• Consider subscribing to community solar gardens for municipal electric load, or providing
sites for gardens.
• Adopt local policies and ordinances that encourage land development that supports travel
demand management (TDM) and use of travel options.
• Consider development standards that increase vegetative cover and increase the solar
reflective quality of surfaces.
• Participate in urban forestry grant programs as available.
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
Last revised: February 26, 2014
;..
M
April _ 2014
Ms. Susan Haigh
Thrive MSP 2040
Metropolitan Council
390 N. Robert Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
Dear Ms. Haigh,
As a fully developed community, the City of Mound is concerned about the level of growth
projected for our community in Thrive MSP 2040 and the proposed increased expectation of an
average residential density of 5 units per acre for a suburban community as the 2030 Regional
Framework included an expectation of 3 units per acre.
The City of Mound is one of the more affordable, urban communities around lake Minnetonka.
The City continues to seek a balance between accommodating its fair share of regional growth
and the protection of the valuable natural water resource that is integral to the community's
character. The City of Mound already has relatively small lots sizes with more than half of the
City's single - family residential lots being zoned with a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. In
addition, in its 2030 Comprehensive Plan the City designated much of its downtown core for
mixed- used development with medium and high density residential.
As the community looks to 2040, there are concerns about where additional household growth
and density can be accommodated. The community is nearly fully developed with generally
only small, infill lots remaining for development. The City has already designated a large part of
its downtown area to mixed use development with medium and high density residential. As
part of its 2030 Comprehensive Plan, the City designated a sufficient amount of land to
accommodate a more than 20% increase in households from 2010. This level of growth is
significant given that the number of households in the City only grew by 7% between 1990 and
2000 and went down slightly between 2000 and 2010. The City anticipates that accommodating
another 4% growth in household will be challenging given the lack of undeveloped sites and
few remaining sites appropriate for redevelopment.
The City of Mound continues to be supportive of diversifying its housing options and providing
its fair share of regional housing needs. As a developed community, however, there are
significant local implications for accommodating additional household growth when there are
no undeveloped or redevelopment areas available. We encourage the Metropolitan Council to
recognize and take into consideration local conditions as it establishes requirements for
individual communities. We also encourage the development of strategies that can support
communities as they attempt to meet regional housing demand.
Sincerely,
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Harbor Wine & Spirits March 2014
Cate Weather
3/1/2014 ovrcast 05
3/2/2014
3/3/2014 overcast-5
3/412014 overcast 20
3/5/2014 overcast 28
3/6. %20'4 overcast 26
3/7/X4.4 overcast 30
3/8/20'4 pt sun 33
3!Q 20? 4
3/1;2014 sun 53
3/11/?C '4 SUN 47
3/12,`' ^_'.4 sun 25
3/117C "4 sun 32
overcast 40
3/16/20 "4 overcast hi 20s
g;.7;r'r.-4 pt sun 32
311.":- - -' 4 wet snw It 28
31': r l'C' 4 ovrcast 35
sun 40
overcast 40
3/21 4 sun 30s
3i2. 2C `4
4 ovrest 20
' -'4 sun 20
4 windy 30S
^ ^ - . '4 rain /snow
ovrest30s
2, "4 sun 40s
i:.._ _
Cust 14 Cust 13 Variance 2014 2013 Difference +/- Cash +/-
501
527
-26
13668.95
13305.15
-0.09
572
-572
0.03
14833.47
271
-0.26
271
5997.44
0.25
277
235
42
6020.6
4735.57
255
281
-26
5658.82
5559.27
275
229
46
6902.99
4460.53
483
248
235
12522.03
4907.54
509
506
3
13994.1
11757.64
508
-508
11584.6
270
270
5264.31
308
262
46
7942.2
4860.28
253
266
-13
6071.83
4802.67
267
253
14
5401.71
5536.42
540
277
263
14020.73
5925.17
514
503
11
13592.69
11244.93
545
-545
13436.73
297
297
5426.04
255
206
49
5510.11
3706.43
248
244
4
4718
4771.18
251
206
45
4622.02
4321.48
461
237
224
10965.79
4498.75
496
482
14
11053.41
10931.56
447
-447
10105.6
238
238
4865
281
227
54
5432.82
4383.42
244
262
-18
5209.67
5761.74
257
246
11
4867.78
4581.46
532
274
258
13777.91
6130.69
553
551
2
13179.76
13533.75
643
-643
17893.78
263
263
4745.44
9237 -138 211432.2 207569.8
:-
363.80 1.06
5997.44
0.99
1285.03
-0.09
99.55
0.03
2442.46
-0.26
7614.49
0.25
2236.46
-1.74
5264.31
3081.92
1269.16
- 134.71
8095.56
2347.76
5426.04
1803.68
-53.18
300.54
6467.04
121.85
-0.67
1.69
0
0.03
-0.12
-0.07
-1.17
-0.5
0.38
0.14
0.07
-1.88
4865.00
0.02
1049.40
-4.37
- 552.07
-0.5
286.32
0
7647.22
015
- 353.99
-0.9
4745.44
3862.40
C�
0.39
-6.97
,4avty Stark
From: toddlynnepeterson @frontiernet.net
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 7:06 AM
To: Amy Stark
Subject: Re: POSC - Open Meetings
Amy, with my work schedule, I want to resign from the POSC. I just can not make the meetings.
Thanks,
Todd Peterson
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 13, 2014 - 7:00 PM
REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call
vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
Page
Open meeting
Pledge of Allegiance
Approve agenda, with any amendments
Mayor Mark Harms with "Mayor for the Day" Proclamations
A. Proclamation Naming Rachel Christensen as "Deputy Mayor for a Day" 849
in the City of Mound, Minnesota
B. Proclamation Naming Seth Anderson as "Deputy Mayor for a Day" in 850
the City of Mound, Minnesota
C. Proclamation Naming Lily Hames as "Mayor for a Day" in the City of 851
Mound, Minnesota
5. *Consent Agenda
*A.
Approve payment of claims
852 -881
*B.
Approve minutes: Apr 22, 2014 . regular meeting
882 -890
*C.
Approve Fire Inspection Permit for Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church
891
— The Blast: Sat, May 17, 2014, with fees paid
*D.
Approve permit for Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for the Northwest
892
Tonka Lions -- WeCAN Fundraising Event, May 16, 2014
*E.
Approve Resolution Approving Variances for 1728 Finch Lane,
893 -916
PID #13- 117 -24 -13 -0018
*F.
Approve an Ordinance Amending Appendix A of the Mound City Code as it
917 -918
Relates to Electric and Gas Franchise Fees
*G.
Approve a Resolution Authorizing Publication of an Ordinance by Title and Summary 919
*H. Cancel Special Meeting Workshop for the purpose of receiving a Concept Plan
for Assisted Living Facility by Trident Development: May 20, 2014, 7:00 PM
*I. Set Special Meeting Workshop for the purpose of receiving Developer Day
Summary: June 17, 2014, 6:30 PM
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
6. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda.
(Limit to 3 minutes per speaker)
7. Kari Kamrath and Rob Winge, County Assessors, with 2014 Hennepin County 920 -940
Assessment and Board of Appeal and Equalization Report from May 7, 2014 (Please
refer to the Hennepin County Assessors 2014 Mound Sales Book that was sent
electronically with the April 8, 2014 Agenda Packet, which is also on file at City Hall.)
8. Jim Reuper, Phelps Bay Captain for the Lake Minnetonka Association, requesting
contributions for the treatment of Phelps Bay
9. Rita Trapp, consultant with Hoisington - Koegler, Inc, requesting discussion on Concept 941 -956
Plan/Sketch Plan Review of proposed 3 -lot major subdivision near the intersection of
Fairfield Road, Meadow Lane and Leach Lane. Applicant: Kent Friedrichsen
10. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer,requesting discussion/action on 957 -970
a Liquor License Applications from Stephani Boyum and Paul Boyum for Cattails
Kitchen and Cocktails, LLC (Also see separate packet.)
A. On -Sale Liquor
B. Sunday Liquor
11, Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer, requesting action on a Resolution 971 -976
Approving a Premises Permit Application for Gambling at Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails, LLC
12. Kandis Hanson, City Manager, requesting discussion/action on an Ordinance
Amending Chapter 50 of the Mound City Code as it relates to Parks and Recreation
prohibiting private business on public lands or waters within the municipal
boundaries of Mound
13. Closed Meeting for the purpose of performance evaluation of Kandis Hanson, City
Manager (Closed at City Manager's option. See separate packet.)
14. Information/Miscellaneous
A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager
B. Minutes: Planning Commission: Mar 4, 2014
C. Reports: Mound Fire Department Fire Commission Meeting
Agenda: May 7, 2014
Strathmore's Who's Who Honors Kandis Hanson
D. Correspondence: Letter from Hennepin County on Community
Development Block Grant Program: Apr 18, 2014
Email from Chief Farniok on Successful Explorers
Competition: May 1, 2014
Letter from Westonka Historical Society, requesting
volunteers
Letter from Mediacom on channel lineup: May 1, 2014
Minnetrista/Mound Clean Up Day: May 10, 2014
Hennepin County Collection Events
15. Adjourn
977 -979
980 -983
984 -999
1000
1001 -1002
1003 -1004
1005
1006
1007
1008 -1009
Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas maybe
viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: unww. oln »o!�nd�enln
PROCLAMATION
OF THE
CITY OF MOUND
PROCLAMATION NAMING RACHEL CHRISTENSEN AS "DEPUTY MAYOR FOR A DAY" IN
THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, Grandview Middle School 6`h grade government class met with the Mayor of Mound
on April 18, 2014, to talk about the role of local government and the role of the Mayor; and
WHEREAS, a project was undertaken by each student to write an essay on what they would do
to improve their city if they were the Mayor; and
WHEREAS, a winner from each of the three classes were determined based on their ideas, their
insight, and their depth of thought; and
WHEREAS, all the essays will be made available to the City of Mound for review and
consideration of the ideas and thoughts expressed; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mound wishes to publically recognize the top essays; and
WHEREAS, Rachel Christensen has been selected among top essayists in her class and second
overall of the three Grandview classes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that
Rachel Christensen is the distinguished recipient of the award of "Deputy Mayor for a Day" in
the City of Mound.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche
Mayor Mark Hanus
PROCLAMATION
OF THE
CITY OF MOUND
PROCLAMATION NAMING SETH ANDERSON AS "DEPUTY MAYOR FOR A DAY" IN
THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, Grandview Middle School 6th grade government class met with the Mayor of Mound
on April 18, 2014, to talk about the role of local government and the role of the Mayor; and
WHEREAS, a project was undertaken by each student to write an essay on what they would do
to improve their city if they were the Mayor; and
WHEREAS, a winner from each of the three classes were determined based on their ideas, their
insight, and their depth of thought; and
WHEREAS, all the essays will be made available to the City of Mound for review and
consideration of the ideas and thoughts expressed; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mound wishes to publically recognize the top essays; and
WHEREAS, Seth Anderson has been selected among top essayists in his class and second overall
of the three Grandview classes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that
Seth Anderson is the distinguished recipient of the award of "Deputy Mayor for a Day" in the
City of Mound.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche
1
Mayor Mark Hanus
PROCLAMATION
OF THE
CITY OF MOUND
PROCLAMATION NAMING LILY HAMES AS "MAYOR FOR A DAY" IN
THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, Grandview Middle School 6th grade government class met with the Mayor of Mound
on April 18, 2014, to talk about the role of local government and the role of the Mayor; and
WHEREAS, a project was undertaken by each student to write an essay on what they would do
to improve their city if they were the Mayor; and
WHEREAS, a winner from each of the three classes were determined based on their ideas, their
insight, and their depth of thought; and
WHEREAS, all the essays will be made available to the City of Mound for review and
consideration of the ideas and thoughts expressed; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mound wishes to publically recognize the top essays; and
WHEREAS, Lily Hames has been named as the top essayist of the three Grandview classes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that
Lily Hames is the distinguished recipient of the award of "Mayor for a Day" in the City of
Mound.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche
ME
Mayor Mark Hanus
City
of Mound Claims
as
of 05 -13 -1
YEAR
BATCH NAME
DOLLAR AMOUNT
2014
PSTGCONTACT
$
941.22
2014
APRIL14 -ELAN
$
31823.31
2014
03- 14KENGRAV
$
11749.24
2014
0502CITYMAN
$
23,339.62
2014
051314CITY
$
125,291.88
2014
051314HWS
$
116,049.49
�TA ( 271,194.7
CITY OF MOUND 04/30/149:24 AM
_.._. ..� ..� Page 1
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: April 2014
..i
Batch Name PSTGCONTACT User Dollar Amt $941.22
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $941.22
Refer 1 POSTMASTER
Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -322 Postage
Invoice 04302014 4/30/2014
Transaction Date 4/25/2014
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
$0.00 In Balance
POSTAGE CITY CONTACT NEWSLETTER
SPRING 2014 - 8 PGS 5,670 PIECES
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
10100 Wells Fargo
$941.22
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $941.22
Total $941.22
$941.22
-853-
$941.22
$941.22
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: April 2014
Batch Name APRILI4 -ELAN User DollarAmt $3,823.31
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,823.31
$0.00 In Balance
Refer-5—ELAN CREDIT CARD _
Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -431 Meeting Expense PARKING -ST PAUL CAPITAL- K. HANSON &
S. SMITH- LOBBY FOR TIF
Invoice 04232014 3/13/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 04232014 3/23/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -430 Miscellaneous
Invoice 04232014 3/27/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training
Invoice 04232014 4/2/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training
Invoice 04232014 411/2014
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -434 Conference & Training
Invoice 04232014 3/5/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training
Invoice 04232014 3/7/2014
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -455 Permits
Invoice 04232014 4/3/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training
Invoice 04232014 3/7/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts
Invoice 04232014 3/25/2014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -434 Conference & Training
Invoice 04232014 411/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training
Invoice 04232014 4/1/2014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -434 Conference & Training
Invoice 04232014 3/20/2014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 04232014 3/1512014
Cash Payment E 22242260 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 04232014 3117/2014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 04232014 3/1812014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 04232014 3/1912014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 04232014 3/20/2014
OFFICE MAX- 90# CARD STOCK FOR
SIGNAGE- HWS
ENGRAVED CLOCK PLANNING
COMMISSIONER -S. WARD RETIREMENT
GRANDVIEW LODGE NISSWA MN PUBLIC
WORKS ASSOC CONF 5 -7 & 5 -8 -14 C.
MOORE
Project 14 -3
MN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC CONFERENCE 5-
7 & 5 -8 -14 C. MOORE
Project 14 -3
RURAL WATER CONF MEALS - 3- 12 -14 -R.
HANSON, D ERVIN, S. KIVISTO
MGMT SEMINAR - HAMLINE U- B. BUNN
Project 14 -5
UTILITY PERMIT HENNEP CTY 4 -3 -14
WATERMAIN BREAK
MGMT SEMINAR - HAMLINE U- B. SWARTZER
Project 14 -5
NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
CUMMINS TRUCK PARK #195
MN RURAL WATER MEMBERSHIP DUES 2014
MN RURAL WATER MEMBERSHIP DUES 2014
INTL FIRE CHIEFS CONF REG. G.
PEDERSON AUG 13 -16 TX
AMAZON.COM- 2 PHONE CAR CHARGERS,
LAPTOP BATTERY
AMAZON.COM- POWER SUPPLY CORD
FAMILY TIES- TRAINING VIDEOS TO DVD
SEARS.COM MEN'S WORKBOOT- G.
PEDERSON
CARBONES PIZZA- LUNCH STANDBY CREW
FROM 1A'AT� -TOWN 3 -20 -14
-854-
05/05/14 9:17 AM
Page 1
$6.00
$16.40
$59.90
$380.88
$235.00
$14.27
$575.00
$215.00
$575.00
$159.51
$112.50
$112.50
$425.00
$67.84
$9.30
$133.58
$44.99
$53.35
i
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/05/14 9:17 AM
Page 2
Current Period: April 2014
.. F?`s,�
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -217 Fire Prevention Supplies
Invoice 04232014 3/21/2014
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -401 Building Repairs
Invoice 04232014 4/1/2014
Transaction Date 4/2412014
Fund Summary
GARRETT SPECIALTIES - BANDAGE MATE $493.75
MPLS GLASS - DISPLAY CASE $133.54
REPLACEMENT GLASS
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,823.31
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$65.90
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
$1.,361.35
601 WATER FUND
$341.77
602 SEWER FUND
$2,037.89
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$16.40
$3,823.31
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,823.31
Total $3,823.31
-855-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
Batch Name 03- 14KENGRAV User Dollar Amt $1,749.24
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $1,749.24
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 62 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN
Cash Payment
E 101- 41600 -300 Professional Srvs
ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SERVICES MARCH
2014
Invoice 119844
4/29/2014
Cash Payment
G 101 -23283 VERIZON WIRELESS -TOW
VERIZON SITE CHANGES LEGAL SVCS
MARCH 2014
Invoice 119844
4/29/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41600 -316 Legal P & I
PLANNING LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 2014
Invoice 119844
4/29/2014
Cash Payment
G 101 -23296 FRIEDRICHSON - FAIRFIELD 5913 FAIRFIELD RD FRIEDRICHSEN LEGAL
SERVICES MARCH 2014
Invoice 119844
4/29/2014
Cash Payment
G 101 -23291 BOYUM- 2544COMMERCE -P 2544 COMMERCE - BOYUM LEGAL SVCS
MARCH 2014
Invoice 119844
4/29/2014
Transaction Date 517/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer
63 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN
Cash Payment
E 475- 46386 -300 Professional Srvs
2014 TIF 1 -3 SPECIAL LEGISLATION -LEGAL
SVCS MARCH 2014
Invoice 119674 3/31/2014
Cash Payment E 475 - 46386 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 119674 3/31/2014
Transaction Date 517/2014
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
475 TIF 1 -3 Mound Harbor Renaissan
AUDITOR'S RD LAND PURCHASES /BECKEL -
LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
10100 Wells Fargo
$1,406.24
$343.00
$1,749.24
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $1,749.24
Total $1,749.24
S
05/08/14 7:59 AM
Page 1
$698.24
$90.00
$450.00
$60.00
$108.00
$1,406.24
$175.00
$168.00
$343.00
CITY OF MOUND 05/02/1411: 00 AM
Page
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
Batch Name 0502CITYMAN User Dollar Amt $23,339.62
Payments Computer DollarAmt $23,339.62
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 7 BENZ, BERNIE _
Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT -5075 $242.65
WINDSOR RD- R. EMMER
Invoice 04292014 4/23/2014
4/2012014
Transaction Date
4/25/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
- --
Refer
1 BOOM ISLAND BREWING COMPAN
_-
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
Invoice 1820
2/24/2014
REIMB MILEAGE C. MOORE-
Transaction Date
4125/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 10
FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA _
Cash Payment
E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells
NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 2 -20 -14 THRU 3-
Cash Payment
20-14
Invoice 4191878 4/20/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41920 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 2 -20 -14 THRU 3-
20-14
Invoice 4191878
4/2012014
Transaction Date
412912014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
2 MILLER PROPERTY SERVICES
Refer 8 MOORE, CARLTON
_Refer
Cash Payment
R 281 - 45210 -34737 Villa Slip Revenue
REFUND CHANGE FROM LLS TO REG
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training
REIMB MILEAGE C. MOORE-
DOCK- MILLER
Invoice 04292014 4/21/2014
Cash Payment
G 281 -22823 Shoreline /Dock Maint Escrow REFUND CHANGE FROM LLS TO REG
Invoice 04292014 4/17/2014
DOCK- MILLER
Invoice 04292014 4/21/2014
Cash Payment
G 281 -22822 Channel Maintenance Escro
REFUND CHANGE FROM LLS TO REG
$27.55
DOCK- MILLER
Invoice 04292014 4/21/2014
Cash Payment G 281 -22821 Slip Maintenance Escrow
Invoice 04292014 4121/2014
Cash Payment G 281 -22000 Deposits
Invoice 04292014 4/21/2014
Cash Payment R 281- 45210 -34705 LMCD Fees
Invoice 04292014 4/21/2014
Cash Payment R 281 - 45210 -34725 Dock Permits
Invoice 04292014 4121/2014
Cash Payment R281-45210-34705 LMCD Fees
REFUND CHANGE FROM LLS TO REG
DOCK- MILLER
Total
REFUND LOST LAKE KEY DEPOSIT- MILLER
REFUND CHANGE FROM LLS TO REG
DOCK- MILLER
REGULAR DOCK FEE- MILLER CHANGE
FROM LLS
LMCD FEE- REG DOCK - MILLER CHANGE
FROM LLS
$242.65
$188.00
$188.00
$184.24
$552.71
$736.95
$1,602.00
$132.00
$132.00
$84.00
$50.00
$18.75
- $325.00
-$7.50
Invoice 04292014 4/21/2014
Transaction Date 4/25/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$1,686.25
Refer 8 MOORE, CARLTON
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training
REIMB MILEAGE C. MOORE-
LMCIT WKSHP
$27.55
4 -16 -14 BROOKLYN PARK
Invoice 04292014 4/17/2014
Project 14 -4
Transaction Date 4/25/2014
Wells Fa- 857_ 10100
Total
$27.55
CITY OF MOUND 05/02/1411:00 AM
Page 2
Payments
",'STY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
_
_Refer 9 MYERS, TONY
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -434 Conference & Training REIMB T. MYERS -MN IAAI CONF MEALS 3 -26
THRU 3 -28 -14
Invoice 04292014 4/29/2014
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -434 Conference & Training
Invoice 04292014 4/29/2014
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -434 Conference & Training
REIMB T. MYERS -MN IAAI CONF LODGING 3-
26 THRU 3 -28 -14
REIMB T. MYERS -MN IAAI CONF
TRANSPORTATION 3 -26 THRU 3 -28 -14
Invoice 04292014
4129/2014
Transaction Date
4/29/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
- --
Refer - -- 6
TITLE SMART INC.
Cash Payment R
601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT -5950
HAWTHORNE RD- C. HUMPHREY
Invoice 04292014
4/23/2014
Transaction Date
4/25/2014
A u
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
— ,� — 1111. . - „�. -_.. ......
Refer 4
VERIZON WIRELESS
_
Cash Payment E
101 -43100 -321 Telephone & Cells
DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 4 -11 -14 THRU
5 -10 -2014
Invoice 9723285062 4/10/2014
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 9723285062 4/1012014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 9723285062 4110/2014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 9723285062 4/10/2014
Transaction Date 4/2512014
Reefer 3 VERIZON WIRELESS
Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 9723471349 4/13/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -13100 Due From Other Funds
Invoice 9723471349 4/13/201.4
Cash Payment G 101 -22816 Personal Cell Phone
Invoice 9723471349 4/13/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 9723471349 4/13/2014
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 9723471349 4/13/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 9723471349 4113/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -321 Telephone & Cells
DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 4 -11 -14 THRU
5 -10 -2014
DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 4 -11 -14 THRU
5 -10 -2014
DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 4 -11 -14 THRU
5 -10 -2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13-
2014
CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13-
2014
CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13-
2014
CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13-
2014
CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13-
2014
CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13-
2014
CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13-
2014
Invoice 9723471349 4/1312014 _858_
$115.00
$184.18
$71.68
$370.86
$111.09
$111.09
$67.75
$67.75
$67.75
$203.23
$406.48
$31.05
$31.07
$0.00
$93.12
$94.77
$93.12
$18.86
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
05102/14 11:00 AM
Page 3
Current Period: May 2014
.. ,. -- .. ] a.. , ..1 w§ k �,, h15R�S.T.'neU 1 ,. � - .. 7. _ ,1S x .a., w , .. ✓.,. ;, .a ., .... „. -
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -321 Telephone & Celts CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- $123.89
2014
Invoice 9723471349 4/13/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 9723471349 4/1312014
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 9723471349 4/13/2014
Transaction Date 4/25/2014
Refer XCEL ENERGY
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 408663086 4/14/214
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 408663086 4/14/214
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 408663086 4/14/214
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 408663086 4/14/214
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 408663086 4/14/214
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 408663086 4/14/214
Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 408663086 4/14/214
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 408663086 4/14/214
Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 408663086 4/14/214
Cash Payment E 285- 46388 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 408663086 4/141214
Cash Payment E 101- 42115 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 408663086 4/14/214
Transaction Date 4/2512014
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
285 MOUND HRA
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- $50.44
2014
CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -14 THRU 5 -13- $13.16
2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $549.48
ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $124.28
ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3130/14 DEPOT $62.66
BLDG
ELECTRIC SVC - 2127/14 TO 3/30/14 $3,747.52
ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $2,003.54
ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27114 TO 3/30/14 $4,373.02
ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $1,358.74
ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $1,962.35
ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $1,962.35
ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $822.67
ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3/30/14 $2,558.22
ELECTRIC SVC - 2/27/14 TO 3130/14 $44.96
Wells Fargo
10100 Wells Fargo
$5,989.35
$2,733.84
$1,686.25
$2,558.22
$4,889.28
$3,935.94
$1,546.74
$23,339.62
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $23,339.62
Total $23,339.62 _859_
10100 Total $19,020.31
CITY OF MOUND
05108/14 1:37 PM
Page 1
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
Batch Name
051314CITY User Dollar Amt $125,291.88
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $125,291.88
$0.00 In Balance
Refer
58 3D SPECIALTIES _
Cash Payment
E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms RAINCOAT & RAINPANT LIME -XL- PARKS
$333.87
Invoice 445143
5/2/2014
Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$333.87
Refer m
65 ACTIONFLEET, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment
E 222- 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair STROBE TUBE ASSEMBLY- LIGHT TRIM
$297.70
RING- TRUCK #22
Invoice 404301
4/30/2014
Transaction Date 5/712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$297.70
Refer
66 AMCON _
Cash Payment
E 222-42260 -325 Pagers -Fire Dept. 4 MINITOR VOICE PAGERS W/ CHARGERS,
$2,105.00
WARRANTIES & PROGRAMMING KITS
Invoice 44483
4/10/2014 PO 24291
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -325 Pagers -Fire Dept. 3 TRAVEL CHARGERS
$294.50
Invoice 44644
4/15/2014 PO 24401
Transaction Date 517/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$2,399.50
Refer
64 ASPEN EMBROIDERY AND DESIG���ry
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies 22 SWEATSHIRTS AND SCREEN PRINTING-
$337.38
FIREMEN
Invoice 05132014
4/2912014
Transaction Date
5/712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$337.38
Refer
1 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY _
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -400 Repairs & Maintenance SVC- GLEN ELYN LIFT GENERATOR &
$964.55
INSTALL NEW CIRCUIT BREAKER @ ARBOR
PT LS
Invoice 27568
4/16/2014
Transaction Date
5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$964.55
Refer
3 BAER, MARCIA _
Cash Payment
R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT -1665
$168.44
CANARY LANE- M. BAER
Invoice 05132014 5/1/2014
Transaction Date
4115/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$168.44
Refer
2 BENIEK PROPERTY SVCS INC._
Cash Payment
E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #1 CBD APRIL 2014 PLOWING
$680.00
Invoice 142742
4/18/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #2 TRUE VALUE - RAMP - SIDEWALKS
$792.00
APRIL 2014 PLOWING& SHOVELING
Invoice 142742
4/18/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #3 COMMERCE BLVD APRIL 2014
$1,755.00
PLOWING
Invoice 142742
4118/2014
Transaction Date
2/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,227.00
..... ,......
.........,
Refer 75 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 222-42260 -210 Operating Supplies COFFEE & CREAMER- FIRE DEPT.
$59.00
Invoice 1166475
4/16/2014 -860-
r
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/08/14 1:37 PM
Page 2
Current Period: May 2014
Transaction Date 518/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $59.00
Refer 4 BUSINESS FORMS AND ACCOUNT
Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -203 Printed Forms
LASER AP CHECKS -5,000
Invoice 048628 4/2812014 PO 23936
BATTERY BOLT
Transaction Date 515/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
-���
Refer _ 49 CARQUESTAUTO PARTS (FIRE)��
FUEL PUMP ASSEMBLY #212
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair
BOAT 11 #28 AIR FILTER
Invoice 6974 - 223873 4/12/2014
FUEL FILTER'06 FORD E350
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair
LIFT SUPPORT #34 '99 FORD F350
Invoice 6974- 224216 4/1812014
AUTO STOCK PARTS
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
ABSORBENT- MEDIUM 25 LB
Invoice 6974- 224490 4/22/2014
AUTO BATTERY'07 DODGE DAKOTA
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer . 48 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (PIVO
AUTO BATTERIES TRANS DISCONNECT
Cash Payment E602-49450-221 Equipment Parts
TRANS DISCONNECT
$432.34
Total $432.34
$8.84
$29.62
$43.65
Total $82.11
$22.22
Invoice 6974- 223287 412/2014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
BATTERY BOLT
Invoice 6974 - 223522 41712014
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -221 Equipment Parts
FUEL PUMP ASSEMBLY #212
Invoice 6974 - 223654 4/9/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -221 Equipment Parts
FUEL FILTER'06 FORD E350
Invoice 6974 - 223657 41912014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts
AUTO STOCK PARTS
Invoice 6974 - 224164 411712014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
AUTO BATTERY'07 DODGE DAKOTA
Invoice 6974- 224479 412212014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts
AUTO BATTERIES TRANS DISCONNECT
Invoice 6974 - 224548 4/23/2014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts
EXACT FIT WIPER BLADE- PARKS VAN
Invoice 6974- 224905 4/29/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts
UNIV LIFT SUPPORT -#407 PELICAN
SWEEPER
Invoice 6974 - 225011 4/3012014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Refer 5 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 05132014 4/23/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 05132014 4/23/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 05132014 4/23/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 05132014 4/23/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 05132014 4/2312014
$5.91
$281.36
$4.42
$101.08
$112.89
- $56.22
$18.18
$40.54
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$530.38
2649 EMERALD DR. LS E3 GENERATOR
$26.12
NATL GAS SVC 3 -20 -14 THRU 4 -21 -14
4791 NORTHERN RD LS Dt GENERATOR
$28.05
NATL GAS SVC 3 -20 -14 THRU 4 -21 -14
3303 WATERBURY RD LS GAS SVC 3 -20 -14 $22.25
THRU 4 -21 -14
2990 HIGHLAND BLVD LS B1 GENERATOR $26.03
NATL GAS SVC 3 -20 -14 THRU 4 -21 -14
4948 BARTLETT LS E2 GENERATOR NATL $29.00
GAS SV-861 14 THRU 4 -21 -14
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
05/08/14 1:37 PM
Page 3
Current Period: May 2014
4a wN"it. *C.'b
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -383 Gas Utilities 4728 CARLOW RD LS GENERATOR NATL $22.25
GAS SVC 3 -20 -14 THRU 4 -21 -14
Invoice 05132014 4/23/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $153.70
Refer 6 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORP_OR
Cash Payment E60249450-230 Shop Materials OXYGEN & ACETYLENE CYLINDERS
Invoice 00783107 4/14/2014 Project 14 -3
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER RENTAL
Invoice 00019142 4130/2014 Project 14 -3
2/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Transaction Date
4/16/2014
Refer -
67 CLAREY S SAFETY EQUIPMENT, I
5/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
AED BATTERY
Invoice 155275
4/29/2014 PO 24299
R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu
Transaction Date 5/7/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
�-
Refer -�
54 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO.
Invoice 05132014 5/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials
DURA DRIVE HOTMIX 2.58 TONS
Invoice 140430
4/30/2014
Transaction Date 5/7/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer
7 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORN _
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts
STIHL EAR MUFF
Invoice 93249
4124/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 45200 -221 Equipment Parts
SAW CHAINS, STIHL BAR
Invoice 93131
4/16/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer
68 D VINCIS NAVARRE, INCORPORAT _
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -431 Meeting Expense
FIRE COMMISSION LUNCH 5 -7 -14
Invoice 416003
5/7/2014
Transaction Date 5/7/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer
74 DOCK MASTERS OF LAKE MTKA I _
Cash Payment
E 281- 45210 -440 Other Contractual Servic
10 DOCK SECTIONS & PLATES -1 EKLO
DOCK FOR LOST LAKE
$125.74
$17.16
$142.90
$259.00
Total $259.00
$140.48
Total $140.48
$11.95
$78.62
Total $90.57
$46.73
Total $46.73
F $400.00
Invoice 202517
4/16/2014
Transaction Date
5/8/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer
9 EDINA REALTY TITLE
Cash Payment
R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu
REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT- 1665
CANARY LANE- EDINA REALTY
Invoice 05132014 5/1/2014
Transaction Date
516/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 55 ELECTRIC PUMP
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair / Maint Supply
FLYGT PARTS- REPAIR FLUSH VALVE KIT,
HEX NUT LOCK, GASKET
Invoice 0052546 412312014
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -220 Repair / Maint Supply PUMP LABOR- IMPELLER ADJUSTMENT
OFFSET
Invoice 0052547 4123/2014
Transaction Date 517/2014 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 56 ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENTAN ,�.�..�.-862-
Total
$400.00
$182.32
$182.32
$732.20
$0.00
$732.20
CITY OF MOUND
05/081141:37 PM
_
Page 4
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current
Period: May 2014
,ait„ic
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs REPAIR STREET SWEEPER - LABOR &
$7,990.15
PARTS
Invoice 11043 4/2112014
Transaction Date 5/7/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$7,990.15
Refer 8 EXECUTIVE TITLE WAYZATA _
Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT -4626
$232.79
BEDFORD RD T. PAKONEN
Invoice 05132014 5/1/2014
Transaction Date 5/5/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$232.79
Refer 72 FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC HENNEPIN _
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -434 Conference & Training
BLUE CARD TRAINING- $425 1FIREMAN G.
$2,550.00
PEDERSON, B BERENT, B. GOTTSCHALK, J.
HARRISON, J. MAAS, J. RICE
Invoice 14 -008 4/17/2014
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -434 Conference & Training
BLUE CARD TRAINING- INKIND SERVICES
- $2,125.00
Invoice 14 -008A 4/17/2014
Transaction Date 5/7/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$425.00
69 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES 1
_Refer
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -219 Safety supplies
6" CUSTOM LEATHER "FIREFIGHTER"
$126.53
FRONT #38
Invoice 8311 4/24/2014
Transaction Date 5/7/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
� � . m...... . " .
$126.53
70 FIRE SAFETY EDUCATION
_Refer
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -217 Fire Prevention Supplies
CHILDREN'S FIRE HATS, TATOOS, LOLIPOPS
$1,137.30
Invoice 46796 4/2212014 PO 24297
Transaction Date 5/7/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,137.30
Refer 71 FIRE SAFETY USA INCORPORATE _
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
2 MUSTANG ICE COMMANDER SUITS
$1,565.00
Invoice 68633 4/17/2014 PO 24289
Transaction Date 5/7/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,565.00
..�,.�10 FIRSTLAB
Refer
Cash Payment E 10143100 -305 Medical Services
DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREENS
$40.00
Invoice 00768488 4/21/2014
Cash Payment E 10145200 -305 Medical Services
DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREENS
$35.00
Invoice 00768488 4121/2014
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -305 Medical Services
DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREENS
$40.00
Invoice 00768488 4/21/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -305 Medical Services
DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREENS
$40.00
Invoice 00768488 4/21/2014
Transaction Date 5/5/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$155.00
Refer 32 FIVE TECHNOLOGY _
Cash Payment E 101 - 41920 -440 Other Contractual Servic
MONTHLY SVC & NETWORK MTCE- MAY
$1,800.00
2014
Invoice 129033 5/1/2014
Transaction Date 4/112014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,800.00
Refer 11 FLATAND VERTICAL TILE STONE _
-863-
OT4° OF [,SOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: May 2014
05/08/14 1:37 PM
Page 5
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic CLEAN STRIP & SEAL FLOORS FIRE $739.50
DISPATCH, UPSTAIRS, HALL, RESTROOMS
Invoice 05132014 4/22/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -440 Other Contractual Servic CLEAN STRIP & SEAL CITY HALL FLOORS $380.50
HALLS, RESTROOMS
Invoice 05132014 4/2212014
Transaction Date 5/5/2014
Refer 33 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA _
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 05132014 4130/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 05132014 4/30/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Refer 57 FULLERTON BUILDING CENTER _
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice 2185050 4/18/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice 2185273
4/28/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice 2185274
4/28/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice 2185271
4/28/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice 2185269
4/28/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice 2185272
4/28/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice 2185270
4/28/2014
Transaction Date
517/2014
Refer 12
G & K SERVICES
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,120.00
PHONE SVC 4/30/14 TO 5/29/14
$118.48
PHONE SVC 4/30/14 TO 5/29/14
$67.45
PHONE SVC 4/30/14 TO 5/29114
$573.62
PHONE SVC 4/30114 TO 5/29/14
$418.60
PHONE SVC 4130/14 TO 5/29114
$406.29
PHONE SVC 4/30/14 TO 5/29/14
$406.29
PHONE SVC 4/30/14 TO 5/29/14
$853.58
PHONE SVC 4130/14 TO 5/29/14
$284.53
PHONE SVC 4130/14 TO 5129/14
$142.26
PHONE SVC 4130114 TO 5/29114
$142.26
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,413.36
RED CEDAR LUMBER - SCREWS- PARKS
$36.55
RETURN -RED CEDAR LUMBER - SCREWS-
- $36.55
PARKS
RED CEDAR LUMBER- SCREWS -PARKS
$36.55
RED CEDAR LUMBER -- PARKS
$226.30
RETURN RED CEDAR LUMBER -- PARKS
- $226.30
RED CEDAR LUMBER-- PARKS
$58.20
RETURN RED CEDAR LUMBER -- PARKS
- $58.20
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$36.55
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 4 -14 -14
Invoice 1006255834 4/14/2014 -864-
$25.21
G €TY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/08/14 1:37 PM
Page 6
Current Period: May 2014
,..eh }w"w" a4va..,i,StislTUx
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006255834 4/14/2014
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006255834 4/14/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 1006255834 4/14/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006267257 4/21/2014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006267257 4/21/2014
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006267257 4/2112014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 1006267257 4/21/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006278647 4/28/2014
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006278647 4/28/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006278647 4/28/2014
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 1006278647 4/28/2014
Transaction Date 4/3/2013
Refer 13 G & K SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 1006278648 4/28/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006255837 4/14/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 1006255837 4/14/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 1006278642 4/2812014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 1006267250 4/2112014
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006267258 4/21/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 1006267258 4/21/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 1006289995 5/5/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006289995 5/5/201.4
Cash Payment E 609 49750 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 1006289987 5/512014
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 1006278649 4/28/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006278649 4128/2014
UNIFORM SVC 4 -14 -14 $25.65
UNIFORM SVC 4 -14 -14 $36.84
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -14 -14 $182.94
Project 14 -3
UNIFORM SVC 4 -21 -14 $25.21
UNIFORM SVC 4 -22 -14 $25.65
UNIFORM SVC 4 -21 -14 $36.84
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -21 -14 $408.58
Project 14 -3
UNIFORM SVC 4 -28 -14 $25.21
UNIFORM SVC 4 -28 -14 $25.65
UNIFORM SVC 4 -28 -14
$36.84
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -28 -14
$178.38
Project 14 -3
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,033.00
MAT SVC 4 -28 -14 CENT BLDG
$55.74
UNIFORM SVC 4 -14 -14 PARKS
$47.67
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -14 -14 PARKS
$75.02
MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 4 -28 -14 LIQUOR
$101.54
STORE
MAT SVC 4 -21 -14 LIQUOR STORE $69.98
UNIFORM SVC 4 -21 -14 PARKS $46.88
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -21 -14 PARKS $65.27
SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -05 -14 PARKS $65.27
UNIFORM SVC 5 -05 -14 PARKS $46.88
MAT SVC 5 -05 -14 LIQUOR STORE $69.98
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 4 -28 -14 PARKS $75.10
UNIFORM SVC 4 -28 -14 PARKS $52.11
i.
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
05/08/14 1:37 PM
Page 7
Current Period: May 2014
,. a)ei"atw`4sa ✓a w s;,.�TJ', .. "'43"uwW"11u uvuwau.;.4euuxl*F f ,,,,i., „.. 3i 1,44. ` i :" ?.vuw�k. wx2"'SY:
Transaction Date 5/5/2014
_Refer 14 GAMETIME
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice 0831120 4/1512014
Transaction Date 5/5/2014
Refer 34 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -395 Gopher One -Call
Invoice 104067 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -395 Gopher One -Call
Invoice 104067 4/30/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Refer 50 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -227 Chemicals
Invoice 3584992 4/17/2014
Transaction Date 4/3/2014
Refer - 15- HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice C282618 4/17/2014
Transaction Date 51512014
Refer 35 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 97317 4/11/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Refer 16 HOME DEPOT /GECF (PA49
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$771.44
PLAYGROUND EQUIP ACCESSORIES, SEAT,
$1,014.40
SPRING, MIRROR, CLEVIS
Project 14 -3
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$1,014.40
APRIL 2014 LOCATES
Invoice 2971676
$60.90
APRIL 2014 LOCATES
$60.90
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$121.80
45 LB AQUAMATE GRANULAR
5/6/2014
$186.68
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$186.68
6" SOLID TUBING DRAINTILE
$310.20
$129.00
Wells Fargo 10100
Total
$129.00
WELD 4" NIPPLE ON PLATE W /HOLES $105.00
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $105.00
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies
SHOP SOFFIT REBUILD MATERIALS
$1,291.05
Invoice 8262806
4/112014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies
RETURN SHOP SOFFIT MATERIALS
- $40.48
Invoice 2971676
4/7/2014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
RATCHET, NAILS, LUMBER, STUDS
$162.06
Invoice 7013445
5/6/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
LADDER & HDWE- PARKS
$310.20
Invoice 7594732
5/212014
Transaction Date
515/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
-- — - - -,, " ,b, _
$1,722.83
.,�.,.,_
Refer 111- -, o ,.36 ISS FACILITY SERVICES MINNEAP _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic
EVERGLAZE FLOORS- HWS
$384.75
Invoice 732321
4/23/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic
EVERGLAZE TILE FLOORS- CENTENNIAL
$930.00
BLDG
Invoice 732324 4/23/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Refer 37 JAN[ -KING OF MINNESOTA, INCOR
Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice MING5140494 5/1/2014
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice MIN05140494 5/1/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
MONTHLY CLEANING CITY HALL MAY 2014
MONTHLY CLEANING FIRE DEPT MAY 2014
S..
$1,314.75
$700.00
$700.00
i lTY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: May 2014
05/08/14 1:37 PM
Page 8
Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -460 Janitorial Services MONTHLY CLEANING CENT BLDG MAY 2014 $476.00
Invoice MIN05140494 5/1/2014
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -460 Janitorial Services MONTHLY CLEANING PUB WRKS BLDG MAY $258.83
2014
Invoice MIN05140494 511/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Refer 38 JUBILEE FOODS a,
Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 05012014 412/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -431 Meeting Expense
Invoice 05012014 41312014
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -431 Meeting Expense
Invoice 05012014 414/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 05012014 4/1612014
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -431 Meeting Expense
Invoice 05012014 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -431 Meeting Expense
Invoice 05012014 5/7/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
_Refer - -- - .m, 18 LAKE MINNETONKA COMM. COMMm
Cash Payment E 101 -49840 -300 Professional Srvs
Project 14 -3
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,134.83
DISH SOAP -CITY HALL $7.98
POP & WATER CITY MGRS' LUNCH MTG $19.22
BLUE CARD TRAINING BEVERAGES- 4/5 & $70.08
4/6/14
MORTON ICE MELT- HWS $11.51
BEVERAGES, PLATES & NAPKINS- FIRE $15.16
COMMISSION MTG 5 -7 -14
COOKIES, WATER- FIRE COMMISSION MTG $6.49
5 -7 -14
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $130.44
1 ST QTR 2014 PEG ACCESS FEE PER
SUBSCRIBER
Invoice 05012014 411512014
Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer -� 59 LAKE RESTORATION, INC.��- ������
Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -440 Other Contractual Servic BEACHWOOD POND TREATMENT
DUCKWEED, SUBMERGED WEEDS &ALGAE
Invoice 112054 4/29/2014
Transaction Date 5/712014
-1
Refer —��- 19 LAWSONPRODUCTS, INC
Cash Payment E 101-45200 -221 Equipment Parts
Invoice 9302390394 4/17/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 9302394937 4/2112014
Transaction Date 4/3/2014
Refer 60 LEAGUE OF- MINNESOTA CITIES
Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -434 Conference & Training
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
MISC PARTS- NUTS, DISPOSABLE GLOVES,
HEAT SEAL RINGS, LOCK, CONNECTORS,
EAR PLUGS
MISC PARTS- NUTS, DRILL BITS, SAFETY
GLASSES, GRAY MTCE PAINT, RUST
CONVERTER, FLAP DISC, BLUE STRIPE
PAINT, LUBE
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
2014 CLERKS ORIENTATION CONFERENCE -
A. STARK JUNE 18 -20
Invoice 199568 5/5/2014 PO 23938
Transaction Date 5/7/2014 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 17 LKQ SMART PARTS INC _ -867-
Total
$11,846.24
$11,846.24
$574.00
$574.00
$483.63
$507.35
$990.98
$250.00
$250.00
CITY OF MOUND 05/08/14 1:37 PM
Page 9
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
w. rb..` uU�M. ta, W,. lii,.ahi.`.t's'fif�vfi£.�In11+� �v�+- Se.'aY wx.L�Yk,u"Wi1lC Xm.Y dvy.uAx
KONICA MINOLTA HP3035 FINANCE /P &1
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs TRANSMISSION ASSEMBLY
$1,235.00
Invoice 55565599 4/7/2014 PO 24349
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts F150 TRUCK RIM- PARKS
$80.00
Invoice 55652577 4/9/2014
Invoice 1737865 4/17/2014
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs TRANSMISSION CORE RETURN
- $429.10
Invoice 55703029 4/10/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$885.90
Refer_ 20 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR�
Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA HP3035 FINANCE /P &1
$70.92
COPIER B & WHT COPIES 1 -20 -14 THRU 4-
3 BIKE RACKS
19-14
Invoice 2014055
Invoice 1737865 4/17/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -202 Duplicating and copying
KONICA MINOLTA HP3035 FINANCE /P &1
$70.92
$25.00
COPIER B & WHT COPIES 1 -20 -14 THRU 4-
TEST 4 -28 -14
19-14
Invoice 700445
Invoice 1737865 4/17/2014
Transaction Date 5/5/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$141.84
Refer 39 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR���
Refer 61 MNI WI PLAYGROUND _
Cash Payment E602-49450-202 Duplicating and copying
KONICA MINOLTA 8200 PW COPIER
$6.26
3 BIKE RACKS
OVERAGE CHG 4 -10 -14 TO 5 -9 -14
Invoice 2014055
Invoice 1745221 5/1/2014
Project 14 -3
Transaction Date 2/19/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$6.26
Refer 40 MCFOA _
Refer 53 MNSPECT _
Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -433 Dues and Subscriptions
MUNICIPAL CLERKS & FINANCE OFFICERS
$35.00
APRIL 2014 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES
MEMBERSHIP DUES- C. PAUSCHE
Invoice 6297
Invoice 05132014 5/6/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$35.00
Refer 52 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE _
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS
WASTEWATER SERVICES JUNE 2014
$51,406.04
Invoice 0001033454 516/2014
-868
Transaction Date 5/7/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$51,406.04
Refer 21 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -470 Water Samples
MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM
$77.50
WATER TESTS -10
Invoice 698131 4/16/2014
Cash Payment
E 601 - 49400 -470 Water Samples
WELL #3 COLI FORM BACTERIA WATER
$25.00
TEST 4 -28 -14
Invoice 700445
5/2/2014
Transaction Date
2/4/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$102.50
Refer 61 MNI WI PLAYGROUND _
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -500 Capital Outlay FA
3 BIKE RACKS
$1,252.00
Invoice 2014055
5/1/2014 PO 24352
Transaction Date
5/712014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,252.00
Refer 53 MNSPECT _
Cash Payment
E 101 - 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees
APRIL 2014 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES
$2,730.98
Invoice 6297
5/6/2014
Cash Payment
G 101 -20800 Due to Other Governments
APRIL 2014 - ELECTRICAL STATE
- $80.00
SURCHFO°° °SE CREDIT
-868
Invoice 6297
5/6/2014
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/08/14 1:37 PM
Page 10
Current Period: May 2014
hli"ti °� 1Gd?S'uH''r'L`v11i.s. 4, $atA3r:�+Rua�;ANk, 3$ <.." sY.:1 . . -
Cash Payment R 101 - 42000 -32220 Electrical Permit Fee APRIL 2014 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION - $253.00
PERMIT FEE CREDITS
Invoice 6297 5/6/2014
Transaction Date 5/7/2014
Refer 41 NORLINGS LAKE MINNETONKA LA
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 29172 4/21/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
REMOVE WINTER COVERS ON
ARBORVITAE- 3 PTS BLVD LIFT STATION
Project PW 1303
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$2,397.98
$55.00
$55.00
Refer 42 NS /I MECHANICAL CONTRACTING, _
Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -401 Building Repairs PREVENTIVE MTCE AGREEMENT JAN THRU $336.87
APRIL 2014 CENT BLDG
Invoice W31375 4/30/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$336.87
Refer 43 PLUNKETT S, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -440 Other Contractual Servic
PEST CONTROL SVC- CENT BLDG 4 -2 -14
$108.16
Invoice 4159780 511/2014
Transaction Date 2/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$108.16
Refer 28 QUAM, JOHN _
Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -37144 Sales of Meters & Rea
DEDUCT METER REFUND 5021 CRESTVIEW
$125.00
BLVD -J. QUAM
Invoice 05132014 5/1/2014
Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$125.00
Refer 44 REPUBLIC SERVICES _
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -384 Refuse /Garbage Dispose
MAY 2014 GARBAGE SVC
$143.65
Invoice 0894- 003478590 4/25/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa
MAY 2014 GARBAGE SVC
$143.64
Invoice 0894 - 003478590 4/2512014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -384 Refuse /Garbage Dispose
MAY 2014 GARBAGE SVC
$143.69
Invoice 0894- 003478592 4/25/2014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -384 Refuse /Garbage Dispose
MAY 2014 GARBAGE SVC
$149.00
Invoice 0894 - 003474924 4/25/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa
MAY 2014 GARBAGE SVC
$219.47
Invoice 0894 - 003475477 4/25/2014
Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -440 Other Contractual Servic
APRIL 2014 CITY -WIDE RECYCLING SVC
$12,991.77
Invoice 0894- 003474617 4/25/2014
Transaction Date 516/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$13,791.22
Refer 23 SCHARBER AND SONS OF LONG L��
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -232 Landscape Material
SUMMER SOIL, ULTRA MIX SOIL
$86.47
Invoice P16718 4/18/2014
Transaction Date 5/5/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$86.47
Refer 22 SIMPLEXGR/NNELL
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic
TAX DUE 2014 BURGLARY- INTRUSION
$24.47
ALARM MONITORING HWS
Invoice 76744644 1/23/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic
TAX DUE 2014 FIRE ALARM & DETECTION
$30,60
MONITORING HWS
Invoice 76744603 1/23/2014
-869-
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: May 2014
05/08/14 1:37 PM
Page 11
;?htiut.axa,..;d +wx wd55, tititulP .ti)aS.v5:S5i'kt.,�11;ptiv''wt ..«.w ,..�^M1Zwua,. .. ...
'1^:�i
Transaction Date 10/1/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $55.07
Refer _ 24 STA -SAFE LOCKSMITHS_COMPAN
Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance TAILPIECE ASSEMBLY -FIRE DOOR BOTTOM $103.80
OF SOUTH STAIRS
Invoice 00019841 4/22/2014
E 101- 45200 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
PARKS COMMISSION OPENINGS AD 4 -19 -14
Cash Payment
E 101 -41930 -210 Operating Supplies
EXTRA KEYS- CITY HALL
$14.25
Invoice 00019849 4/29/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 45200 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
Transaction Date
5/512014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$118.05
Refer
25 SUN NEWSPAPERS -HWS ACCT _
Cash Payment
E 601- 49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -430 Miscellaneous
READERS' CHOICE AD- HWS 4 -5 -14
$261.00
Invoice 193769
415/2014
Transaction Date
5/5/2014
Transaction Date 11/6/2013
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$261.00
Refer
26 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY _
Cash Payment
E 601 - 49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
LEGAL NTCE -2013 ANNUAL DRINKING
$404.78
WATER REPORT 4 -19 -14
Invoice 93440
4/19/2014
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -328 Employment Advertising
PUBLIC WORKS SEASONAL WORKER
$74.00
EMPLOYMENT ADS 4 -5 -14
Invoice 199739
4/5/2014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -328 Employment Advertising
PUBLIC WORKS SEASONAL WORKER
$74.00
EMPLOYMENT ADS 4 -12
Invoice 199739
4/12/2014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment
E 101 - 45200 -328 Employment Advertising
PARKS SEASONAL WORKER EMPLOYMENT
$74.00
ADS 4 -19 -14
Invoice 199739
4/19/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -328 Employment Advertising
PARKS SEASONAL WORKER EMPLOYMENT
$74.00
ADS 4 -26 -14
Invoice 199739
4/26/2014
Transaction Date 5/5/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$700.78
Refer
27 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY _
Cash Payment
E 101 -42400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
LEGAL NTCE -AMEND PUBLIC LANDS
$19.28
PERMITS APPROVAL PROCESS 4 -19 -14
Invoice 93439 4/19/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
PARKS COMMISSION OPENINGS AD 4 -19 -14
$91.20
Invoice 94472
4/19/2014
Invoice 113714
4110/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 45200 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
PARKS COMMISSION OPENINGS AD 4 -26 -14
$91.20
Invoice 96911
4/2612014
Cash Payment
E 601- 49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
HYDRANT FLUSHING NOTICE- 4 -26 -14
$114.00
Invoice 96912
4/26/2014
Transaction Date
5/5/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$315.68
Refer 46 TRUE VALUE HWS
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 113860
4/16/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 113714
4110/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Refer 45 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE)
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 114211 4/28/2014
TILE ADHESIVE, NOTCH SPREADER
NATURALCLEANER
Wells Fargo 10100
RECEPTAN F COVER
-870-
$9.38
$13.88
Total $23.26
$4.29
CITY OF MOUND
05/08/14 1:37 PM
,,--
—'—�
Page 12
Payments
&ITY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$4.29
Refer -��47
TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PWPKS)_�
Cash Payment
E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies
SANDPAPER- PICNIC TABLES
$5.98
Invoice 113462
4/112014
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials
NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS SIGN SHOP
$43.96
Invoice 113468
4/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials
NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS SIGN SHOP,
$15.48
FLANGE
Invoice 113487
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials
SOCKET SET, SOCKADAPTER,
$40.97
THREADLOCKER - #109
Invoice 113489
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials
RETURN SOCKET SET
- $23.99
Invoice 113492
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials
HEX BUSHING, CONNECTOR
$8.98
Invoice 113493
4/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies
AEREATOR- TRAIL BATHROOMS
$11.98
Invoice 113520
4/3/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts
RND STL ROD
$14.99
Invoice 113606
4/7/2014
Cash Payment
E 601 -49400 -210 Operating Supplies
FLIP UP TOOL HOLDERS
$19.98
Invoice 113623
4/7/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts
BALL VALVES, ADAPTERS, PVC PIPE
$26.36
Invoice 113668
419/2014
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies
SHOP CLEANERS, WIPES, ADJ SPRAYER
$33.74
Invoice 113680
4/912014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment
E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
TENNIS NETS- PARKS CABLES, HDWE
$15.02
Invoice 113801
4/14/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials
MURIATIC ACID
$8.49
Invoice 113833
4/15/2014
Cash Payment
E 285 -46388 -210 Operating Supplies
TRASH CAN LINER- PARKING DECK
$11.99
Invoice 113867
4/16/2014
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts
NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS, FUEL SHUT OFF
$26.06
VALVE, MOWER FUEL LINE FILTER
Invoice 113906
4/1812014
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS, ELBOW
$4.14
Invoice 113910
4/18/2014
Cash Payment
E 601 -49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
GALV CAPS- WELL #3
$8.58
Invoice 113929
4/18/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS- IP HALL REPAIR
$6.38
Invoice 113980
4/21/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41910 -430 Miscellaneous
FLOWERS FOR CENTENNIAL BLDG
$42.98
PLANTERS
Invoice 114197
4/27/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
- "-- ---- ...,11
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
�.. ....................
$322.07
_. -...nP 1- -'..,__„r.,rona
Refer 29 UHL COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 101 -41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance
SVC CALL HEATING SYSTEM- CITY HALL 4-
$721.00
18 -14
Invoice 26616
4/18/2014
_
Transaction Date
4/15/2014
Wells Farr. 871- 10100 Total
$721.00
CITY OF MOUND 05/08/14 1:37 PM
-- - ---�, Page 13
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
..,,. ri sib,`„ag1ntVa.'Sxv�tF,i«+ti4'RY u"Sai": t'Sdul�,Rr"kivU'3'X.,.Pan.�.
Refer 51 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE_
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance LEAK LOCATE @ 5928 HILLCREST RD 3 -24- $266.80
14
Invoice 4977 4/22/2014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance LEAK LOCATE @ 2443 COMMERCE BLVD 3- $292.00
26 -14
Invoice 4977 4/2212014
Transaction Date 516/2014
Refer 30 XCEL ENERGY
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 0518661770 4/25/2014
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 0518919079 4/28/2014
Transaction Date 5/5/2014
Refer 31 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE -��
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 54089299 4/21/2014
Transaction Date 5/5/2014
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
285 MOUND HRA
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $558.80
SHORELINE /COMMERCE STREET LIGHTS 3- $56.63
26 THRU 4 -24 -14
CARLOW RD LIFT STATION ELECTRIC SVC $93.47
3 -29 THRU 4 -26 -14
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.10
FINGERTIP BANDAGES, ANTIBIOTIC $24.30
OINTMENT STERILE TWEEZERS
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $24.30
10100 Wells Fargo
$40,324.62
$8,698.95
$400.00
$11.99
$2,922.01
$57,817.83
$1,550.71
$13,565.77
$125,291.88
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $425,291.88
Total $125,291.88
-872-
CITY OF MOUND 05/08/1411:40 AM
Page 1
Payments
CITY OF N40UND
Current Period: May 2014
z. ... t ;K �? k rc C ",
Batch Name 051314HWS User Dollar Amt $116,049.49
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $116,049.49
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
Invoice 463411804 4128/2014
Refer BELLBOY CORPORATION__ _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
FREIGHT
Invoice 463411804 4/28/2014
Transaction Date
5/612014
Wells Fargc
Refer
2 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
Invoice 49199
4/2312014
Invoice 90140800 517/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Wells Fargc
Refer 36 ASPEN EMBROIDERYAND DESIG
10100 Total
10100 Total
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -218 Clothing and Uniforms SWEATSHIRTS & FLEECE CREWS W /HWS
LOGO EMBROIDERED- 54 ITEMS
Invoice 05132014 5/512014
Transaction Date 5/8/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer BELLBOY CORPORATION__ _
_3
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies
BAGS, SUPPLIES
Invoice 90054200 4/18/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 90059000 4/21/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX
Invoice 90086400 4/25/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
BAGS, SUPPLIES, C -FOLD TOWELS
Invoice 90140600 5/712014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX
Invoice 90140800 517/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
MERCH, CUBS & TWINS CUPS,
Invoice 90140800 5/7/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer BELLBOY CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 42673900 4118/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
Invoice 42673900 4/1812014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 42689900 4/21/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 42770000 4/25/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
Invoice 42770000 4/25/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 42825200 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
Invoice 42825200 4/3012014
-873-
Total
Total
$120.28
$1.00
$121.28
$237.45
$237.45
$1,882.50
$1,882.50
$50.60
$51.00
$60.95
$70.70
$258.58
$49.46
$541.29
$453.05
$10.20
$3,496.45
$291.00
$5.10
$1,852.75
$18.60
CITY OF MOUND 05/08/1411:40 AM
Page 2
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
Invoice 14061
Cash Payment E
609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$3,874.30
Invoice 42845000
5/212014
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 19495
Cash Payment E
609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$49.60
Invoice 42845000
512/2014
5/6/2014
Refer,
Cash Payment E
609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$6,053.66
Invoice 42930400
5/7/2014
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 749638
Cash Payment E
609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$76,34
Invoice 42930400
5/7/2014
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 750479
Cash Payment E
609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$112.00
Invoice 42934200
5/7/2014
5/6/2014
Refer
Cash Payment E
609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.55
Invoice 42934200
5/7/2014
5/6/2014
Refer 10
Transaction Date
5/612014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $16,294.60
Refer 5
BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN
'Cash Payment E
609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa
MIX
$207.55
Invoice 128979
4/2312014
Cash Payment E
609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$858.43
Invoice 128980
4/23/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $1,065.98
Refer 6
CROWRIVER WINERY
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
Invoice 14061
4/17/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Refer
7 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 19495
4/2112014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 1077518
5/5/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Refer,
8 DAYDISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 749637
4/29/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 749638
4/29/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 748805
4/22/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 750479
5/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 750713
5/6/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Refer
9 EXCELSIOR BREWING COMPAA
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 3588
4/22/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Refer 10
EXTREME BEVERAGE
MaR4
$402.92
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$402.92
BEER
$522.00
BEER
$676,60
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$1,198.60
BEER
$3,107.70
BEER
$36.80
BEER
$3,396.95
BEER
$300.00
BEER
$3,660.90
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$10,502.35
BEER
$110.00
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$110.00
ME
CITY OF MOUND
E609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
05/08/1411:40 AM
---�„
Invoice 2199963
Page 3
!l Payments
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
$77.60
r
4/22/2014
-F OF MOUND
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
Current Period: May 2014
$444.35
Invoice 2213409
4/29/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX
$97.00
Invoice W944216 4/16/2014
MIX
$77.60
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
5/6/2014
$145.50
Invoice W952079 4130/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$3,464.45
$130,50
Invoice W936471 4/2/2014
Cash Payment
Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$373.00
Refer 11 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED
Invoice 2194499
4122/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
Cash Payment
$386.00
Invoice 698712 4/23/2014
Total $7,298,95
5/7/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
$567.25
Invoice 701034 517/2014
WINE
$2,959.25
Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$973.25
Refer 37 INDIAN ISLAND WINERY
Invoice 1845017
5/7/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE
$275.52
Invoice 1982 5/5/2014
._
Transaction Date 5/812014 Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$275.52
Refer 12 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN
Cash Payment
E609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,185.75
Invoice 2199963
4122/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
$77.60
Invoice 2199964
4/22/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$444.35
Invoice 2213409
4/29/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
$77.60
Invoice 2213448
5/6/2014
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,464.45
Invoice 2213447
5/612014
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$49.20
Invoice 2194499
4122/2014
Cash Payment
Transaction Date
516/2014 Wells Fargo 10100
Total $7,298,95
Refer 14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$3,106.21
Invoice 1839487
4/30/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$3,377.85
Invoice 1839488
4/30/2014
Transaction Date
516/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $6,484.06
Refer
13 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR������
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$36.00
Invoice 1833997
4123/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$3,183.06
Invoice 1833995
4/23/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,776.35
Invoice 1833996
4/23/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX
$24,00
Invoice 1845018
5/7/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$2,959.25
-875
Invoice 1845017
5/7/2014
—w
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: May 2014
05/08/14 11:40 AM
Page 4
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$3,926.91
Invoice 1845016
5/712014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $11,905.57
Refer 38 LAKE MONSTER BREWING _
_
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$130.00
Invoice 1331
5/6/2014
4/21/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $130.00
Refer 15 MARLIN S TRUCKING
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight
Invoice 29245 413/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight
Invoice 29265 4/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
Invoice 29274 4/14/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight
Invoice 29290 4/1712014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
Invoice 29298 4/21/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight
Invoice 29314 4/24/2014
Transaction Date 51612014
DELIVERY SVC 4 -03 -14
DELIVERY SVC 4 -10 -14
DELIVERY SVC 4 -14 -14
DELIVERY SVC 4 -17 -14
DELIVERY SVC 4 -21 -14
DELIVERY SVC 4 -24 -14
Wells Fargo 10100
$222.35
$170.45
$105.85
$347.95
$47.85
$183.30
Total $1,077.75
Refer 39 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 4 -7 -14
Invoice 928023614 4/2712014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 16 MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSN
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -412 Building Rentals
Invoice 05132014 5/1/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Refer 17 MOUND, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -382 Water Utilities
Invoice 05132014 4/20/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Refer 18 MUZAK- MINNEAPOLIS
MAY 2014 COMMON AREA MTCE &
INSURANCE HWS
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
WATER SERVICE 3-4 -14 THRU 4 -1 -14 HWS
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$61.00
$61.00
$1,045.50
$1,045.50
$48.10
$48.10
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic
MAY 2014 MUSIC SERVICE
$115.95
Invoice A093115
5/1/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $115.95
Refer
PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _
_19
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$798.69
Invoice 8445437
4/21/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$11.25
Invoice 8445437
4/21/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$57.00
Invoice 8445436
4121/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2.25
Invoice 8445436
4/21/2014
-876-
CITY OF MOUND 05/08/1411:40 AM
Page 5
Payments
CITV - OF
Current Period: May 2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2.25
Invoice 8445444
4/21/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rase MIX
$47.00
Invoice 8445444
4/2112014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
... ........ ........ . . ------
$918.44
20 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA -
-Refer
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$990.16
Invoice 8446284
4128/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$13.75
Invoice 8446284
4/28/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$153,94
Invoice 8446578
4/29/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2.25
Invoice 8446578
4/29/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$254.00
Invoice 8447206
5/5/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$5.25
Invoice 8447206
5/5/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,305.04
Invoice 8446054
4/2412014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$18.75
Invoice 8446054
4/24/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$57.00
Invoice 8447204
515/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2.25
Invoice 8447204
515/2014
Transaction Date
5/612014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$2,802.39
Refer 21 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$618.25
Invoice 2593491
412312014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$647.60
Invoice 2593490
4/23/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
------ 1 — ------------
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$1,265.85
___1__11_____"_____'_
Refer 22 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$179,60
Invoice 2597080
4/30/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$859.10
Invoice 2597081
4/3012014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$1,211.60
Invoice 2600847
5/7/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,408.45
Invoice 2600848
5/7/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$56.00
Invoice 2600849
5/712014
Transaction Date
516/2014
_, _" - —1-1-11-1111-1,11 1
Wells Fargo
111__,___"'',
10100 Total
" I'll 111 11 1 ''I'll, I., I I'll .1 111, 11,11- I'll
$3,714.75
- 1 1-11
- - 111"_ .... ......
Refer 23
1 11 11-1— 1-1.
QUILL.COM
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
COPY PAPER
$64.10
Invoice 2088949
4/10/2014
-877-
i
ILI
61TY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
05/08/14 11:40 AM
Page 6
Current Period: May 2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -200 Office Supplies REGISTER ROLLS, LASERJET TONER, TAPE $475.96
& DISPENSER
Invoice 2088319 4/10/2014
Transaction Date 5/612014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $540.06
Refer _ 24 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 4 -30 -14 $15.00
EDITION
Invoice 293740
4/21/2014
$333.90
Transaction Date
516/2014
Wells Fargo
-���-
Refer 25 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
_
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 1156675
4/30/2014
E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 1156673
4/30/2014
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
Invoice 9032724
4/16/2014
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
Invoice 1154276
4/24/2014
51612014 Wells Farr^ 10100
. ............aN... M.. 11 111-1, 1111 ,,:
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 1154275
4/24/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 1154274
4/24/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 1159127
5/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
WINE
Invoice 1159126
518/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
Invoice 0009108
4/2412014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
Invoice 0008339
3/13/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Wells Fargo
Refer 26 ST. CLOUD REFRIGERATION, INC
10100
10100
Total $15.00
$1,534.00
$1,156.33
- $57.00
$36.14
$941.00
$561.10
$1,292.40
$1,410.00
- $180.00
- $226.97
Total $6,467.00
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs REFRIGERATION & HEATING MTCE - $315.00
REPLACE AIR FILTERS & BELTS 4 -25 -14
Invoice 281256 4130/2014 _
Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $315.00
Refer 28 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE
$333.90
Invoice 817997
412212014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
$189.25
Invoice 817998
4/22/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX
$51.50
Invoice 817998
4/22/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
$6,134.48
Invoice 818000
4/22/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT
- $90.00
Invoice 817999
4/22/2014
Transaction Date
..1.111..,,,, -.. -1111
51612014 Wells Farr^ 10100
. ............aN... M.. 11 111-1, 1111 ,,:
Total $6,619A3
CITY OF MOUND 05/08/1411:40 AM
Page 7
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
4." 1w04`4%2,0,Q
,u, ""'ZV, 02, "'OR,
Refer
27 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
Cash Payment
E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$161.25
Invoice 819525
412912014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$5,330.00
Invoice 819526
4/29/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT ADJ INVOICE
-$20.00
Invoice 816641CR 4/15/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT ADJ INVOICE
-$29.90
Invoice 771789CR4/7i2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,637.20
Invoice 820860
516/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$125.40
Invoice 820861
5/6/2014
Transaction Date
5/6/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $8,203.95
-- —..r
Refer
29 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment
E609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$152.25
Invoice 0097272
4/24/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2.00
Invoice 0097272
4/24/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$96,00
Invoice 0097270
4/24/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2.00
Invoice 0097270
4/24/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa SODA
$109.75
Invoice 0097271
4/24/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$12.00
Invoice 0097271
4/24/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa SODA
$36.75
Invoice 0097707
511/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2,50
Invoice 0097707
5/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$276,00
Invoice 0097706
5/112014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$7,50
Invoice 0097706
5/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$98.00
Invoice 0093942
4/16/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$5.00
Invoice 0093942
4/1612014
Transaction Date
516/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $799.75
Refer 30 WINE COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$636.00
Invoice 358705
4/17/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$13.20
Invoice 358705
4/17/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$268.00
Invoice 359475
4/24/2014
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$4.20
Invoice 359475
4/24/2014
-879-
CITY OF MOUND 05/08/1411:40 AM
Page 8
Payments
i
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
Invoice 292952 4/18/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Refer 33 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 1090213740 4/23/2014
Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 1090213761 4/23/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 1090216793 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 1090221047 5/7/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Refer 34 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRI _
Wells Fargo 10100
BEER
BEER
BEER
BEER
Wells Fargo 10100
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 1080170875 4/24/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$168.00
Invoice 360108
5/1/201.4
LIQUOR
Invoice 1080170863 4/24/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$6.30
Invoice 360108
5/1/2014
LIQUOR
Invoice 1080173041 4/30/2014
Transaction Date 516/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,095.70
.. .v..,..� .. ........
Refer
31 WINE MERCHANTS _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,232.25
Invoice 500356
4/23/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$354.75
Invoice 501319
4/30/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX
$67.00
Invoice 500357
4/23/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$46.00
Invoice 502297
5/7/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$2,880.00
Invoice 502296
517/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
,.
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$4,580.00
- ., �.... -.v
Refer
.... ._..�., ..............
32 WINE NEWS INCORPORATED_ _
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
WINE ENTHUSIASTMAY 2014 ISSUES FOR
$15.00
SALE
Invoice 292952 4/18/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Refer 33 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 1090213740 4/23/2014
Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 1090213761 4/23/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 1090216793 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 1090221047 5/7/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014
Refer 34 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRI _
Wells Fargo 10100
BEER
BEER
BEER
BEER
Wells Fargo 10100
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 1080170875 4/24/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
Invoice 1080170874 4/24/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 1080170863 4/24/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
Invoice 2080035960 4/14/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 1080173041 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 1080173366 5/1/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 1080176639 5/812014
S:1
Total $15.00
$1,965.00
$348.00
$3,659.30
$2,442.02
Total $6,414.32
$985.64
$23.94
$637.37
- $352.00
$724.97
$587.50
$704.00
CITY OF MOUND 05/08/1411'40 AM
Page 9
Payments
CITY (3F MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
;aRt. ... . ..... I.... a
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $48.00
Invoice 1080176641 5/8/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,734.00
Invoice 1080176640 5/812014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,358.11
Invoice 1080176638 5/8/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,451.53
Refer 35 Z WINES USA LLC _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $670.00
Invoice 12907 4/24/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $16.00
Invoice 12907 4/24/2014
Transaction Date 5/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $686.00
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $116,049.49
$116,049.49
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $116,049.49
Total $116,049.49
I:
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $116,049.49
$116,049.49
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $116,049.49
Total $116,049.49
I:
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
April 22, 2014
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on
Tuesday, April 22, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building.
Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Kelli
Gillispie and Ray Salazar
Members absent: None
Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Fin Dir /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche,
Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, Public
Works Superintendent Ray Hanson, Community Service Officer Mike Wocken, Dan Faulkner,
Rita Trapp, Jay Green, Eric Everson, Katie Wojak, Linda Cordie, Robert Brown, Thomas
Stokes, Cathy Bailey, Sandy Korlath, Michael Michalk, Brian Simmons, Patricia Ewer, Phil
Velsor, Mary Moon, Carolyn Brooks, Karen Buckholtz, Terry Blount, Peter Meyer
Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in
nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a
Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent
Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
1. Open meeting
Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Pledae of Aileaiance
3. Approve agenda
The Mayor noted some page revisions on the agenda that were requested by Staff. Hanson
requested the addition of item 4H on the Consent Agenda.
MOTION by Salazar, seconded Wegscheid, to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
4. Consent agenda
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon
roll call vote all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $416,726.22
B. Approve minutes of the: April 8, 2014 regular meeting.
April 15, 2014 special meeting workshop
C. Approve permits for Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church — The Blast for Saturday, May
17, 2014 with fees paid.
1. Public Dance /Live Music Permit
2. Banner /Sign Permit
Mound City Council Minutes —April 22, 2014
D. Approve permits for 2014 Mound Fire Relief Association Annual Fish Fry for June 7,
2014 with fees waived.
1. Banner /Sign Permit
2. Public Dance /Live Music Permit
3. 1 — 4 day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License
E. Approve Public Gathering Permit for Minnetonka Classic Bass Club Fishing Contest at
Surfside Beach and Park for Saturday, May 31, 2014, with fee and damage deposit paid.
F. Parks & Open Space Commission recommendation on new piayscape location.
G. Set special meeting workshop for the purpose of receiving a concept plan for an assisted
living facility by Trident Development on Tuesday, May 20, 2014 at 7:00 p.m.
H. (added) Approve Agreement between the cities of Spring Park and Mound regarding the
provision of nuisance enforcement services.
5. Comments and suggestions trom citizens present on any item not on the agenaa.
Bob Brown, 5450 Three Points Boulevard and President of Seahorse Condominium
Association, presented two bottles of brown water. He summarized a conversation with City
Staff on Friday, April 18, 2014. Brown complained about the lack of notification and that
residents have incurred damages to clothing and have had to purchase drinking water. The
Mayor said this has become a bigger issue and wider spread than what was expected so he will
allow the discussion to go over the three (3) minutes.
Carlton Moore stated the two water towers on Evergreen and Chateau are being cleaned and
that it has to be done either in the spring or fall. Iron and manganese have built up and have to
be flushed to clean it out. Flushing a water tower changes the flow and disturbs the water.
Moore stated the water is safe. Moore stated the water tower was shut down when the extent of
the problem became apparent, but that it may happen again when the Evergreen tower is shut
down. The Mayor asked if the minerals settle in the system again or will it flush out. Moore
stated it settles and flushes out through the residences.
Brown asked why would you do this over Easter weekend and Moore apologized for not
considering that fact. Brown asked why the signs were not posted. Brown asked for a
reduction in fees. Mayor Hanus said that the majority of residents were inconvenienced and
there are not surplus funds so a rebate would just result in higher rates for all. The Mayor
requested that Staff provide notification for future maintenance.
Eric Evenson, Administrator of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, presented the 2013 Year
in Review Report that was included in the information section of the packet. Evenson
highlighted partnerships that are in place with universities and local and state agencies to do
research and conservation projects. Projects included the stabilization of Big Island shoreline
and the restoration of the Minnehaha Creek in parts of St. Louis Park and Hopkins. Evenson
also acknowledged the contributions Jay Green has made through his role as the LMCD
representative for Mound.
Evenson discussed efforts to change the regulations /rules that will impact how cities are able to
work with property owners on variances and exceptions. Evenson stated the MCWD is looking
at partnerships in order to help communities meet their water resource needs and goals and to
Mound City Council Minutes — April 22, 2014
determine how they integrate with economic development and parks and open spaces
conservation.
Carolyn Brooks, Wheels for Meals/WeCAN fundraising event coordinator, announced the event
will take place on Saturday, May 17`h from 10 am to 1 pm. Brooks stated participants will bike to
St. Boni and back and that there will be drawings and a raffle. Brooks said the registration fee is
$6, which is the price of one meal, and there is information on how to pledge on -line and at the
library/schools.
6. Mayor Hanus requesting action on a resolution proclaiming "WeCAB Week in Mound"
as May 4 -10. 2014.
Hanson acknowledged the members of WeCAB in the audience. Hanson stated WeCAB was
formed to fill the transportation gap and has been very successful.
Mayor Hanus read the resolution in its entirety. Mike Michalk, Pastor of Mount Olive Lutheran
Church and President of WeCAB, spoke to thank the City Council, and particularly Kandis
Hanson, for their /her efforts.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -25: RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING WECAB WEEK IN MOUND MAY
4-10,2014
7. Mayor Hanus requesting action on a resolution autnonzmg a TeastDUety siuuy Tor a
Lake Minnetonka Scenic By -way concept.
Hanson stated this would be one of 23 by -ways in Minnesota and that scenic by -ways promote
economic development and tourism. Hanson stated communities are being asked to adopt the
resolution in support of the concept. Hanus said the City is approaching this cautiously, and
that there appears to be minimal or no cost and that there are no proposals to change the
roads.
Gesch asked if there is any cost to the City to do this study. Hanson stated there was no
request for funding. Gesch asked if this would be operated at the local, state, or federal level.
Hanus stated one of the primary concerns was if there would be any requirements to change
the road and it appears there is not. Gesch asked if there would be any restrictions on private
property owners. Hanus said it is his understanding that the State designates it as by -way and
that the cities can choose to sign and /or market it. Gesch asked if research has been done on
eminent domain or other impacts on property owners. Hanson stated she expressed those
concerns at the meeting and stated that it can't impact the City's broader goals. Hanus said
there are many cities that are hesitant but this is just trying to decide if there is enough interest
to even study it. Salazar stated he has concerns about traffic and public safety impacts.
Hanson stated the City will need to decide on the subject matter that will be emphasized in
Mound and she feels the Historical Society will play a role.
Gesch asked about the packet materials and Hanson stated that was just an example of a
federal level effort. Gillispie questioned the resolution language, specifically the second
paragraph where it was not clear what the City's financial obligation would be. Hanus stated he
believes the cities will have a lot of discretion as to what extent they want to participate.
Gillispie stated she is okay with the concept at this point but does not want to be obligated to
spend any money.
Mound City Council Minutes —April 22, 2014
Salazar asked if this could go through without our approval and Hanson stated it may be
designated but not marked. Hanson stated there are many examples in the state that can be
researched to determine the pros and cons. Hanson suggested anyone is free to call the
Chamber of Commerce in existing scenic by -way locations in order to hear the pros and cons
for themselves. Hanus said it is not saying 'yes' to the concept, just the investigation, and that
he had expressed that to Wayzata Mayor Ken Wilcox.
Gesch asked if the cities received the same resolution and is concerned about some of the
wording. Hanus said that the "Now Therefore..." is the most important part of the resolution and
he read the language to confirm it is just approving a study and nothing else.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution. Discussion
ensued. Gillispie asked if language should be added to address any cost implications. Salazar
asked if traffic impacts would be studied. Hanus said it could be sent back if it was not. All
voted in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -26: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A
LAKE MINNETONKA SCENIC BY -WAY CONCEPT
8. Dan Faulkner Consulting Engineerwnn ttoiton ar menK, requesting giscussromacoon
on the following:
Faulkner reviewed the report that was included in the packet. Faulkner stated one bid was
received and was over 30% of the estimated cost so Staff is recommending denial. Staff
brainstormed to determine the reasons for the high bid and low number of responses. Possible
reasons include a changing bid climate with the improvement in the economy, the prevailing
wage requirements due to MSA funding, the construction and access challenges of Three
Points Boulevard, and the required timeframe. Staff is therefore proposing a two year
construction timeline dividing the project between the east and west areas of Three Points.
Faulkner stated the single entry off of Commerce Boulevard is the challenge. Faulkner
recommended bidding the first part in June for construction to begin after July 4 I and to
conclude in the fall. Faulkner recommended reducing the area for MSA funding and to bid the
utility work separate. Falkner summarized the breakdown of projects and timing presented in
the packet. Faulkner stated the Commerce Boulevard force main was removed from the
proposal to simplify the package.
Hanus asked what the prevailing wage requirement is. Faulkner said it is essentially union
wages and smaller contractors don't usually pay those wages. Hanus asked if MSA road
standards are meant to handle more traffic or heavier vehicles and Faulkner said both.
Faulkner said buses and garbage trucks are the heavier vehicles that use these streets. Hanus
asked the impact on MSA funds and whether or not the City would lose funds. Faulkner said
there are many items that qualify for state aid and the City would maximize the state aid funding
on that portion of the project. The City will pay for the extra depth and width in other areas, but
that it will still be built to those standards.
Wegscheid asked if Bartlett Boulevard is a MSA street and Faulkner said that it is a County road
but that the City owns the utility infrastructure. Gillispie asked why the Commerce Boulevard
force main was removed and why was it included in the first place. Faulkner said it was taken
out because of the different approach but that it may be added back in depending on the bid
results. Wegscheid asked if breaking up the project was designed to attract smaller contractors
or more contractors and Faulkner said both. Wegscheid asked what about the
Mound City Council Minutes —April 22, 2014
duplication /overlap with separate projects and wouldn't that cut into savings. Faulkner stated
the expectation was that the savings would outweigh the duplication /overlap.
Hanson said there are other public safety benefits to splitting it up and that the original
specifications required the contractor to keep one lane open at all times which drove up costs.
Hanus clarified Bartlett Boulevard will be a trenchless repair.
Gesch asked about data on water main breaks on Bartlett Boulevard and requested that
information on the timing and number of breaks be provided before the bid is brought forward
for approval. Wegscheid asked what the costs are to redo the plans and specs and Faulkner
said there will be some cost but that the vast majority of information is already there.
A. Resolution rejecting the bid for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall
Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -27: RESOLUTION REJECTING BID FOR 2014 STREET, UTILITY,
AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT —THREE POINTS BOULEVARD
B. Resolution ordering preparation of bid documents, and ordering advertisement for
bids for the 2104 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — East Three Points
Boulevard
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -28: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY, AND
RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJET — EAST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD
C. Resolution ordering preparation of bid documents and ordering advertisement for
bids for the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvement Project, Lost Lake Bridge to Wilshire
Boulevard
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution. Gesch asked if
it would be bid differently since it is trenchless and Moore stated it would. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -29: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE BARTLETT BOULEVARD
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — LOST LAKE BRIDGE TO WILSHIRE
BOULEVARD
D. Resolution ordering preparation of bid documents and ordering advertisement for
bids for the 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — West Three Points
Boulevard — Utility Improvements
Mound City Council Minutes —April 22, 2014
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -30: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY, AND
RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — WEST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD —
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
E. Resolution ordering preparation of bid documents and ordering advertisement for
bids for the 2104 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — West Three Points
Boulevard — Street and Retaining Wall Improvements
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -31: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF BID DOCUMENTS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY, AND
RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — WEST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD —
STREET AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS
Smith stated at the April 8th Council meeting, Staff was directed to prepare a resolution denying
the appeal. Smith stated additional information was received from the applicant for
consideration by the Council. Ms. Sisk asked that if the denial is approved, she requested
additional time to remove the alpacas. Staff recommends a six month timeframe to avoid
having to bring it back to the Council. Smith said that language could be added to the draft
resolution to address the timeframe for removal.
Hanus noted that on page 824 of the packet, the outcome of the vote was stated backward and
the 'three' needs to be 'two' and 'two' needs to be 'three.' Hanus stated he has concerns about
the applicant's request being tied to the sale of the home and that it should be based on a
reasonable time to find a home for the animals.
Discussion ensued about whether the additional language should be included in the draft
resolution or a separate resolution. Hanus said he felt it was better supported and enforceable
as one resolution. Gillispie asked what if you oppose one motion but support the other. Hanus
said that it is part of the role of the Council to have to decide one way or the other even if they
don't agree with everything. Smith said she discussed it with the City Attorney who stated that
additional language could be added and Smith feels it is in the City's interest to complete this
tonight. Hanus polled the Council and the majority of members felt six months was reasonable.
Hanus suggested the following additions under the "Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved" section:
5. The applicant must find a new home for the alpacas within six (6) months from the
date of the adoption of this resolution.
Mound City Council Minutes — April 22, 2014
6. Following the expiration of the six month period, the City retains full ability to enforce
the code.
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Hanus, to adopt the following resolution as amended. The
following voted in favor: Salazar, Hanus, and Gesch. The following voted against: Wegscheid.
The following abstained: Gillispie. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -32: RESOLUTION DENYING BOARD OF APPEALS ZONING
ADJUSTMENT AND APPEAL REQUEST FROM ALLISON SISK REGARDING THE
KEEPING OF ALPACAS AT 6221 WESTEDGE BOULEVARD
10. Sarah Smith Community Development Director, requesting aiscussioniactron on the
Urban Agriculture study related to the keeping of chickens.
Smith said that at the February 25t Council meeting, the Council directed Staff to prepare
language that prohibits bee keeping and to do research to determine what cities allow chickens
and to determine if those cities have encountered any issues as a result. Smith summarized the
research and said that some cities require a class to educate potential chicken owners. In
addition, Staff did analysis using GIS and determined that even if setbacks were applied, some
properties in Mound are big enough to accommodate the keeping of chickens. Smith added
that hardcover limits could then be an issue.
Trapp described the research and said Staff identified a typical lot, average size house, and
setbacks that are common in Mound to see if chicken coops can even be accommodated.
Trapp summarized a sample of the GIS analysis that was performed. Trapp stated she did feel
language could be developed to create enforceable standards and asked if the Council wanted
to consider drafting language. Hanus asked if there was anyone in the audience who wanted to
speak on the subject.
Tom Stokes and his son Harrison, 4744 Hampton Road, said they have had chickens for years
but that he does not recommend allowing roosters. He said fresh eggs have more nutritional
benefits and he believes 8 -10 square feet per chicken is recommended. His coop has floor
space under 50 square feet but it is multi -level and very automated. His son sells the eggs to
neighbors and there is plenty of demand. He does not know of any complaints.
Hanus asked what happens when they age and don't lay as many eggs. Stokes said they can
lay eggs for up to five (5) years. Stokes said there are different breeds of chickens that are
better for urban agriculture. Stokes said it has been a very positive experience and a good
learning opportunity for his kids. Stokes invited anyone who would like to do a site visit to his
home.
Hanus said he did research to try to find any opposing opinions. Hanus stated NBC news
reported the number of chickens is exploding and that they get abandoned. A rescue in
Minneapolis said they hoped that the fad had peaked. Minneapolis had 1500 permitted
chickens with 500 in a rescue. Cities were warned to budget for enforcement and rescue.
Hanus stated there is a 50/50 chance a chick will be a rooster so there are frequent
enforcement issues if roosters are banned. CBS news stated roosters are typically not allowed
because the crowing is a nuisance and 1 in 20 chicks are a rooster. In summary, Hanus said it
is growing into an issue in a lot of areas and he is not crazy about the idea. Hanus stated his
research recommended permitting and licensing each bird.
Mound City Council Minutes — April 22, 2014
Hanus complemented the Staff research but said it contains estimates. Hanus said the City of
Woodland recently approved chickens but required two (2) acre lots. Hanus said he is aware of
12 cities that allow chickens meaning that three times more don't allow them in the metro area.
Stokes pointed out it comes down to the owner because many dogs and cats get abandoned
too. Hanus said the City has to deal with all of types of owners and has to anticipate the
problems including neighbors not getting along or irresponsible owners. Mound has smaller lots
than most cities that allow them. Hanus said you can't connect chickens to dogs. Stokes said a
pet is a pet and it is based on the owner. Hanus said a similar argument was made during the
discussion on alpacas but the Council has to determine whether to consider it a farm animal or
a pet. Hanus believes raising them for eggs makes them a farm animal. Hanus said allowing
chickens will drive a lot of changes to the code and that it is a major undertaking, although he
does not believe that is a reason not to do it.
Salazar said chickens are a farm animal and the decision by the Mound City Council in 1960 to
become a City with typical pets and not farm animals should be honored. Salazar said the
challenge is where to draw the line and said Staff has already dealt with enforcement issues
with farm animals.
Gillispie said she has been approached by residents on the subject outside of the Council
meetings. The majority of them are not in favor. Hanus said, similar to the alpaca issue, is that
chickens are farm animals that make a decent pet. The question is whether you want to allow
one or more farm animals. Hanus believes if it is allowed more people would take it up and
more issues that we are currently not dealing with will occur. Hanus said permit and licensing
issues and correlated costs would need to be covered in the fees.
Salazar asked what animal would be proposed next. He quoted an August 2013 Star Tribune
article that two alligators where being kept as pets in Washington County, Minnesota. Salazar
asked for the City Council to consider the change made in 1960 and that the CSO does not
need more enforcement issues.
Hanus asked about the list of cities that allow chickens who do not have agricultural zones. He
referenced the town of Mayer, Minnesota, who only allows them in the agriculture zones.
Hanus said the current code explicitly does not allow chickens.
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Hanus, to direct staff to prepare a zoning and code
amendment confirming that chickens are not allowed in the City of Mound. The following voted
in favor: Gillispie, Salazar, Hanus, and Gesch. The following voted against: Wegscheid. The
following abstained: None. Motion carried.
11. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussionfaction
authorizing submittal of comment lefter to the Metropolitan Council regarding the Thrive
MMSP 2040 draft local forecasts for the City of Mound.
Trapp highlighted the particular parts of the Thrive MMSP 2040 plan that are relevant to Mound.
Mound has been classified as suburban and the City will need to update the Comprehensive
Plan as to how the City will meet the revised goals. Trapp said the increase in overall density
may change from 3 — 5 units per acre to 5 units per acre.
Hanus asked how other cities are dealing with this. Some cities are building high density and
that Mound does not have enough area. Hanus stated he is concerned that the unelected Met
Council has virtual veto authority on city projects. Hanson stated there is a disparity between
Mound City Council Minutes — April 22, 2014
demanding dense housing without providing for transportation and jobs and that one requires
the other. Trapp said Mound is showing less population but has to grow the total number of
households since there are less people per household than in the past. Trapp said planners are
trying to challenge the Met Council to look regionally and recognize the difference between
communities.
Wegscheid asked what the consequence of not meeting the requirements is. Hanus said the
Met Council has to approve our Comp Plan and it is a negotiation to get to an agreement.
Salazar asked if there are any penalties or fines. Hanson said the City may lose out on livable
communities grants that have been a real source of funding in the past and the City should be
concerned about maintaining the relationship with Met Council. Trapp said that is why Staff is
participating in all initiations to provide feedback. Hanus asked who is our current
representative and Hanson said it has not changed. Trapp said this exercise is to give feedback
on the overall goals and principals and asked if the City Council is comfortable with the content
of her proposed letter and whether or not anything needs to be added. Trapp said the deadline
is the end of April. Trapp said the main question is how the average density requirements will
be applied. Hanson asked if City Council would like the language strengthened and the Council
agreed. Trapp thanked the Council for their support.
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to direct Staff to strengthen the language of the
letter and submit to the Metropolitan Council by the deadline. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
12 Information /Miscellaneous
A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager:
Kandis Hanson stated Staff will participate in 'Developer Day' that will take place on
Monday, April 28th at Ehlers & Associates. Discussions will center on the Harbor
District area in Mound.
Mark Hanus gave an update on the TIF bill currently at the legislature and that it will
most likely result in three additional years, not five.
B. Minutes:
C. Reports: MWCD 2013 Year in Review
Harbor Wine & Spirits — March 2014
D. Correspondence: Resignation of Todd Peterson from Parks & Open Space Commission
13. Adiourn
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch to adjourn at 10:13 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
r-140
Mayor Mark Hanus
fMOUNT FIRE D IPAR IMENT TGTC�.l AMOUNT CiUE
/?
24 IS C!vc �
f Mound, NIN 5S364 —_-
�.;;,/� P!iorw: (9!2)4/20555 Fax: 19S2i4723/75 j
APPLICAIJON FOR P114fv11TS SUB -LC1 W Flk£ INSPLUIONS
CHECK BOX OF PERMIT(S) APPYING FOR;
Tent, Canopies &.Membrane Structures.rspc tar Ban Fire `or Spec al. Evert ?fee - $2Sf
Retall m Specia, Edect (Fee - $25j " Open Flame or Candles i!- Assemb,y Area 1Fee - 525)
Temporary Heathy and; o+ LP Usage SFee $2S) Temporary Assemb y or OCtupancy IPee - $251
Fire IrspGr_'tlUnCheck „W—tt ava11au1e fqr tie abuye-perrmts:
11^ppl,cant or &.noes,, Name: _ Ciuy—.
()-F-11-1e _1 . - - - - _
Contact Per,00n(,$) _ rr.�
No:.. IP)L-3�•3694 r -jNn E rna il'f'�c
EVENTINFORMAT1Dtt
Event Gzte4si _. Start Ti*'e, p m12.11
_.__. 00¢q%A
Event Location
i .
Area to be used: v u t
,t Attendance ADD D
Day of Event Contact Person:_ �'D l 0_� Cell No. (0 (% •j [�°) 33”
The fol!ow,ng rtorm alien must accompany tie permit apo ication term when apply: rig for an operatznal permit:
"FOR TENT PERMIT, APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE THE FOLL04'ONG'
Type of Strucl��re _ b'�` __ Size of Strwwo: V D -)�., Z-zq
Does the structure have enclosed sides_ Yes No —. _ _ -, --
Proof of flame - resistant treatment of your tent or membrane structure bet NFPA 741
�- teas e d Fvt�vv� t,tW i r'a le- � ✓�� �
The permits effective Por the above dzte(o- }. For qu�stiors regarding Fire Permits, cab 9., sys—s .
The undersigned hereby agrees fiat al= ,rtcrmabon on this applicaton is true and co•rert, and that they shah comp:y
vr.th all appfcab +e cty ord,rarces. state and fcderal rules, and tie rulings of the tvleund Fire Code Ott cia:.
App:icants Signatt.re: D 'l D 1 a Cc - __ Date.
I I A4
Approved By:._._.__._.___- ___.__. -.... .._.__.____ -.. -.. ... T,tle.._
,,Ir ^O: q:n... � I ,..,PC1, .¢, r ;,..,ntr.r Cq:ut nrrt.10>
i
_. hate: _ _..... _,.__. - -...
xmN�esm�grtrnennarn oeeaaue snecx "
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division
444 Cedar Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101
651- 201 -7500 Fax 651- 297 -5259 TTY 651- 282 -6555
APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY
TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
Name of organization rDate organized jTax exempt number
Address City State Zip Code
4 ___7 Minnesota C�
Name of person making application Business phone Home phone
Date set ups will be sold Type of organization
o`' cpClub ❑ Charitable ❑ Religious ❑ Other non - profit
name
LocatioMhere permit w II be used. If an outdoor area, � C,C� r - describe.0P "�
NA/ e— J
State Zip
Minnesota t Gj
If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and a dress f the liquor license providing the service.
/�fb
If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage.
�� I F j %� i2 ✓ t >���J %% tt(�'G� �/ C2l a� c7 �> :ry
APPROVAL
APP ICA ON MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
ova= ►nt ne� n
City /County Date Approved
C'ty Fee Amount Permit Date
51( .,
Date Fee Paid
-Signature City City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
NOTE: Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and /or county to the address
above_ If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the
permit for the event.
-892
Page 1 of }
Executive Summary
TO: Mound City Council and Staff
FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner
DATE: May 8, 2014
SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 14 -02 Setback Variances Request
REQUEST SUMMARY
The applicant, Mr. Grant Johnson of Suncrest Builders, is requesting that the City of Mound
approve a front yard setback variance of 10.8 feet and a rear yard setback variance of 10 feet to
allow the replacement of the existing home and detached garage at 1728 Finch Lane with a new
home with an attached garage. According to Hennepin County records, the 8,345 square foot
property has an existing home that was built in 1920 and does not conform to existing setback
requirements.
The applicant was previously granted a 9.8 front yard setback variance and a 10 foot rear yard
setback variance in Resolution No. 13 -104 adopted in November of 2013. City Council members
are advised that copies of the 2013 variance application, Planning Reports and related materials
are available and can be provided upon request. After further design work, the applicant has
found the previously granted front yard setback variance is not sufficient and is requesting an
increased front yard setback variance.
The applicant indicates in the narrative provided that they have been unable to reduce the width
of the home as required by the previous variances while meeting the owners' desire for it to be
accessible. The reduced house width was required to ensure a 5 foot rear yard setback and
sufficient fire separation. The applicant is proposing to cantilever a portion of the house one foot
over the west wall to accommodate the size of hallway needed between the bedroom and
kitchen. The redesign will also result in a two -foot reduction in the overall length of the house.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their May 5, 2014 meeting and recommended
unanimously for its approval. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference.
RECOMMENDATION
As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request at the
direction of the City Attorney, Staff has prepared a resolution that will replace the previous
resolution adopted in November of 2013. Staff recommends approval of the resolution including
the conditions and findings of fact.
123.893 -Chird Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -XXX
RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR 1728 FINCH LANE
PID #13- 117 -24 -13 -0018
WHEREAS, the applicant, Mr. Grant Johnson, submitted a request on behalf of
the property owner, Mr. Jeffrey Jesberg, for variances to allow for the
construction of a new home at 1728 Finch Lane; and
WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -1A single - family residential zoning
district; and
WHEREAS, the R -1A single - family residential zoning district requires a 20 foot
front yard setback and a 15 foot rear yard setback; and
WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to replace the existing nonconforming
house and detached garage on the property; and
WHEREAS, the property is an odd shaped lot located at the terminus of Finch
Lane that only has a depth of 40 feet along the portion adjacent to Finch Lane;
and
WHEREAS, home site locations are also limited by the 50 foot setback from the
ordinary high water level and the presence of a water utility line between the 50
foot setback and the terminus of Finch Lane; and
WHEREAS, the applicant seeks the following setbacks for this project:
EK
Required
Existing
Proposed Variance
Lot Area
6,000 sq. ft.
8,345 sq. ft.
8,345 sq. ft. -
Front Yard
20 feet
7' 3"
9.2' 10.8'
Rear Yard
15 feet
4'3"
5' 10'
Side Yard
6 feet
3'8"
12' -
(northeast)
Hardcover
3,338 sq. ft.
1,517 sq. ft.
1,832 sq. ft.
(maximum
40 %)
EK
WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting
variances which is provided below:
(a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not
mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter
imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land.
No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event
that the following circumstances exist:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as
defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2.
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands,
structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to
property within the same zone.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate
the practical difficulty.
(4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the
general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms
of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
;and
WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined
as follows:
Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that
(i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable
manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; and
(ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the
property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other
circumstances not created by the landowner; and
(iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the
locality.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.
Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to
direct sunlight for solar energy systems.
MKS
WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variances for the proposed project
are contained in the Planning Commission report dated April 30, 2014 and the
submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variances subject to conditions;
and
WHEREAS, the variances were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its May
6, 2014 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council
approval of the variances as recommended by Staff; and
WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council makes the following findings of
fact:
The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met.
2. The construction of a single- family home with an attached garage is a
reasonable use of the property and will be in character with the
surrounding neighborhood. It is further reasonable that the property
owner wants to construct an accessible home to accommodate
someone with limited mobility.
The variance is requested due to circumstances unique to the
property and not due to the actions of the applicant. The lot depth of
40 feet near Finch Lane is half of what is required by City Code.
4. The applicant has minimized the variance requested by cantilevering
only a portion of the west wall of the home. The applicant has also
reduced the home length by two feet.
5. Setbacks on the property will be improved as both the front and rear
setbacks have been increased. In addition, the project will eliminate
the existing nonconforming side yard setback.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Mound does hereby approve the variances with the following conditions:
The variance hereby replaced the variances approved by Resolution No.
13 -104 that was adopted by the City Council on November 12, 2013.
2. Applicant and owner shall comply with all requirements from the Public
Works Department related to the required work on the public sanitary
sewer line including, but not lot limited to, sleeving the existing sewer line
that is located within the 15 -foot public easement that bisects the property.
Applicant or owner shall be responsible for payment of all involved costs
related to the required utility work. Applicant or owner shall also be
responsible for coordinating work with the Public Works Director or
designee including all required permitting. No utility work is authorized
until approval is granted by the Public Works Director or designee.
Site, utilities, and drainage plans shall be subject to review and comment
by the City Engineer and Public Works Director or their designee. Site
runoff cannot be directed towards adjacent properties. The use of gutters
for the project shall be required.
4. Applicant and owner shall be responsible for payment of all costs incurred
by the City that are associated with this application.
5. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is
included as part of this action.
6. Applicant and owner shall provide all required information upon submittal
of the building permit application.
7. Applicant and owner shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all
local or public agency permits.
8. The applicant and owner shall be responsible for recording the resolution
with Hennepin County.
9. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the
resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient
amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to
record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow.
10. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
(MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others
are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as
regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the MCWD
by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to
contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits
that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the
MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release
of any future building permit.
11. The applicant and owner are solely responsible for any negative impact on
the utility service to the adjoining parcels.
12. Applicant and owner are advised that the perpetual easement for public
sewer and other utility purposes, including the right to open, lay out,
construct, maintain, and service the same and the right to remove trees,
brush and soil there from over, under and across the Southwesterly 15
feet of the Northerly 42.5 feet of Lot 12, Block 12. Block 14, Dreamwood is
in force.
MOM
13. The applicant and owner are advised that City has the right to undertake
whatever means necessary to gain access to its underground utilities and
that the home to be constructed over the City's easement may be
significantly impacted should the City need to exercise its easement rights.
14. The City may require the applicant and owner to indemnify and hold the
City harmless prior to the issuance of a building permit for this property
which will be recorded. If a hold harmless agreement is required, it shall
be prepared by the City Attorney with all costs to be paid by the applicant
or owner. If there is a mortgage on the property, written consent from all
lien holders will be required.
15. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described
property:
Lot 12, Block 14, DREAMWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof
Hennepin County, Minnesota, including adjacent part of Wiota Common
lying between the southwesterly extension of the centerline of Finch Lane
and the southwesterly extension of the east line of said Lot 12.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th of May 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Mark Hanus, Mayor
MINUTE EXCERPTS
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 6. 2014
Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin
Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist & Pete
Wiechert. Staff present: Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander.
Others present: Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd); Art &
Barb King (2964 Pelican Point Cir); Loren Pellet (5660 Sunnybrook Cir); Matt Van Nelson (2925
Meadow La); Grant Johnson (6347 Bay Ridge Rd)
BOARD OF APPEALS
Planning Case No. 14 -03 Variance
1728 Finch Lane
Trapp reviewed the previous variances
Johnson, Suncrest Builders
pproved in 2013. Variances of 10.8 feet
front and 10 foot rear yard setback were reviewed by Tripp. The previous variance was
deemed to be insufficient and they_are requesting anotherfoot of variance to the front yard
setback. The existing home had a front yard setback of 7 feet, a rear yard setback of 4 feet and
a side yard setback of 3 feet. Even with the requested variance the proposed setbacks are
improving. .The lot depth is substantia)Iy.less than -required. There is an existing water line
running,betvveen the.lake and the.proposed, house. 'The applicant has taken the views of the
neighbors' into consideration. Another part ofthe,challenge is designing accessibility for the
lifetime of:the owners. There is also a sewer line that is proposed to remain under the garage
portion of the house. It will be sleeved and properly supported.
Staff is recommending approval with the same conditions from the previous variance. Findings
include: construction of.a single family home with attached garage is reasonable; a lot depth of
40 feet is half of what is required,• cantilevered only part of west wall; reduced length of home
by 2 feet; setbacks requested are better than existing.
Gawtry and Goode questioned the accessibility design when there are 10 steps up to the front
door. Trapp indicated that the applicant Mr. Johnson can address this.Grant Johnson (6347 Bay
Ridge Rd) said that the intent is to install a ramp in the garage in the future. The house was
shrunk a fair amount to increase the garage size for that purpose.
Susan Gardner (1724 Finch La) questioned if the west setback was changing. Trapp indicated it
would stay the same. Gardner asked about expense regarding the sewer and who was paying
for it. Trapp said the applicant is paying for it. Gardner was curious as to why the house had 2
MORE
levels if it was to be accessible. Trapp said all the living can be on the main level. One level has
everything they need. Gardner also wanted to know which direction the roof would go for
drainage. Johnson indicated that it would drain toward their house but that gutters will be
required.
The existing sanitary sewer line the runs under the proposed garage was discussed.
Retterath noted that there were trees between houses. Gardner said that they were essentially
on the property line and that their removal was not that big a deal if Jesberg is paying to take
them down. Retterath asked Johnson how deep the basement floor was from grade. Johnson
said it was about 8 feet. Retterath talked about the effect oftree removal and protecting the
foundations during construction.
MOTION by Wegscheid, second by Stone, to support staff recor
unanimously.
•II
ation. MOTION carried
V
nAA
CI'fl' Ofi MQUND _.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PLANNING CASE NO.
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
ZONING:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
BACKGROUND
Planning Commission
Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
April 30, 2014
14 -02
Variance
Mr. Grant Johnson of Suncrest Builders
1728 Finch Lane (PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -13 -0018)
R -1A Single Family Residential
Low Density Residential
K
The applicant, Mr. Grant Johnson of Suncrest Builders, is requesting that the City of Mound
approve a front yard setback variance of 10.8 feet and a rear yard setback variance of 10 feet
to allow the replacement of the existing home and detached garage at 1728 Finch Lane with a
new home with an attached garage. The applicant was previously was granted a 9.8 front yard
setback variance and a 10 foot rear yard variance in Resolution No. 13 -104 adopted in
November of 2013. Planning Commission members are advised that copies of the 2013
variance application, Planning Reports and related materials are available and can be provided
upon request. After further design work, the applicant has found the previously granted front
yard setback variance is not sufficient and is requesting an increased front yard setback
variance.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a
landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property
owner, in evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined
in City Code Sub. 129 -2.
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands,
structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to
property within the same zone.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the
practical difficulty.
(4) A variance shall only be pf_9g1_ad when it is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance
are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows:
Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that:
(i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the zoning ordinance;
(ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including
unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the
landowner; and
(iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical
difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar
energy systems.
60 -DAY PROCESS
The variance application was submitted on March 27, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State
Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use
request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota
Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of
application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be March 28, 2014.
SITE INFORMATION
The applicant is requesting the variances on behalf of the property owner, Mr. Jeffrey Jesberg.
According to Hennepin County records, the 8,345 square foot property has an existing home
that was built in 1920 and does not conform to existing setback requirements. The property is
an odd shaped lot located at the terminus of Finch Lane on Harrison Bay. The front of the lot is
considered the northwest side as it is the only part located on an improved public street. The
depth of the lot along Finch Lane is only 40 feet. The placement of the home and attached
garage on the lot are limited due to the 50 foot setback from the ordinary high water line, as
well as the presence of a water utility line between the 50 foot setback and the terminus of
Finch Lane.
The applicant indicates in the attached narrative that they have been unable to reduce the
width of the home as required by the previous variances while meeting the owners' need for it
to be accessible. The reduced house width was required to ensure a 5 foot rear yard setback
and sufficient fire separation. The applicant is proposing to cantilever a portion of the house
one foot over the west wall to accommodate the size of hallway needed between the bedroom
and kitchen. The redesign will also result in a two -foot reduction in the overall length of the
house.
EM
PROPOSED DIMENSIONS
CITY /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVIEW
Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved departments,
consultants, agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below:
Melissa Manderschied, City Attorney
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Dan Faulkner, City Engineer
Correy Farniok, Orono Police Chief
Scott Qualle, Building Official
DISCUSSION
The parcel is part of the Dreamwood settlement
agreement. Recommend a reference in the
Planning Report and resolution include mention
that the requested variance does not violate the
agreement.
If the 2013 resolution was recorded, then I would
recommend the 2014 approval be an
amendment that references the 2013 approval
and specifically include the document number
following recording.
Appears the 2014 request is for the cantilever on
the shortened side and doesn't otherwise alter
or amend any of the other terms of the 2013
resolution.
I have no comments /concems.
1 have no concerns with this request.
No issues.
I have no comments.
The applicant is seeking to replace the existing 1920 home and detached garage with anew
two -story home with attached garage.
o The shape of the lot limits the ability of the property owner to construct a home without a
variance.
The presence of the waterline through the property limits the ability of the property owner
-90-
Required
Existing
Proposed
Proposed Variance
11/2013
412014
Lot Area
6,000 sq. ft.
8,345 sq. ft.
8,345 sq. ft.
8,345 sq. ft. -
Front Yard
20 feet
7.25'
10.2'
9.2' 10.8'
Rear Yard
15 feet
4.25'
5'
5' 10'
Side Yard (northeast)
6 feet
3.75'
10'
12' -
Hardcover (maximum 40 %)
3,338 sq. ft.
1,517 sq. ft.
1,862 sq. ft.
1,832 sq. ft.
CITY /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVIEW
Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved departments,
consultants, agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below:
Melissa Manderschied, City Attorney
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Dan Faulkner, City Engineer
Correy Farniok, Orono Police Chief
Scott Qualle, Building Official
DISCUSSION
The parcel is part of the Dreamwood settlement
agreement. Recommend a reference in the
Planning Report and resolution include mention
that the requested variance does not violate the
agreement.
If the 2013 resolution was recorded, then I would
recommend the 2014 approval be an
amendment that references the 2013 approval
and specifically include the document number
following recording.
Appears the 2014 request is for the cantilever on
the shortened side and doesn't otherwise alter
or amend any of the other terms of the 2013
resolution.
I have no comments /concems.
1 have no concerns with this request.
No issues.
I have no comments.
The applicant is seeking to replace the existing 1920 home and detached garage with anew
two -story home with attached garage.
o The shape of the lot limits the ability of the property owner to construct a home without a
variance.
The presence of the waterline through the property limits the ability of the property owner
-90-
to place the home significantly toward the shoreline. The placement closer to Finch Lane
will also minimize view obstruction by the house to the neighbor's property.
• The applicant has tried to minimize the variance by only cantilevering a portion of the west
wall instead of the entire length.
• The applicant has reduced the side yard setback by 2 feet as part of the house redesign.
• A sewer line bisects the property to serve the adjacent property to the east. As part of the
previous approval process the applicant worked with the City to identify a way of
reconstructing the sewer line so that the proposed home and garage could be built over it.
This reconstruction should continue to be required as part of the variance approval
process.
• Requested variance does not violate the 2006 Dreamwood settlement agreement.
• Resolution No. 13 -104, a copy of which is attached, was not released for recording. It is the
recommendation of the City Attorney that if the variance is to be approved then the
previous resolution be rescinded and a new variance resolution that encompasses both the
front and rear setback variance be adopted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve a
10.8 foot front yard setback variance and 10 foot rear setback variance for this site subject to
the following conditions:
1. This variance hereby replaces the variances approved by Resolution No. 13 -104 that
was adopted by the City Council on November 12, 2013.
2. Applicant and owner shall comply with all requirements from the Public Works
Department related to the required work on the public sanitary sewer line including but
not lot limited to, sleeving the existing sewer line that is located within the 15 -foot
public easement that bisects the property. Applicant or owner shall be responsible for
payment of all involved costs related to the required utility work. Applicant or owner
shall also be responsible for coordinating work in with the Public Works Director or
designee including all required permitting. No utility work is authorized until approval
is granted by the Public Works Director or designee.
3. Site, utilities, and drainage plans shall be subject to review and comment by the City
Engineer and Public Works Director or their designee. Site runoff cannot be directed
towards adjacent properties. The use of gutters for the project shall be required.
4. Applicant and owner shall be responsible for payment of all costs incurred by the City
that are associated with this application.
5. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as
part of this action.
6. Applicant and owner shall provide all required information upon submittal of the
.e,
building permit application.
7. Applicant and owner shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or
public agency permits.
8. The applicant and owner shall be responsible for recording the resolution with
Hennepin County.
9. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at
Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the
City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be
taken out of the escrow.
10. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules
related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are
now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was
officially turned back to the MCWD by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011.
Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and
applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence
from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of
any future building permit.
11. The applicant and owner are solely responsible for any negative impact on the utility
service to the adjoining parcels.
12. Applicant and owner are advised that the perpetual easement for public sewer and
other utility purposes, including the right to open, lay out, construct, maintain and
service the same and the right to remove trees, brush and soil therefrom over, under
and across the Southwesterly 15 feet of the Northerly 42.5 feet of Lot 12, Block 12.
Block 14, Dreamwood is in force.
13. The applicant and owner are advised that City has the right to undertake whatever
means necessary to gain access to its underground utilities and that the home to be
constructed over the City's easement may be significantly impacted should the City
need to exercise its easement rights.
14. The City may require the applicant and owner to indemnify and hold the City harmless
prior to the issuance of a building permit for this property which will be recorded. If a
hold harmless agreement is required, it shall be prepared by the City Attorney with all
costs to be paid by the applicant or owner. If there is mortgage on the property,
written consent from all lienholders will be required.
-9Q5-
15. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property:
Lot 12, Block 14, DREAMWOOD, according to the recorded plat
thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, including adjacent part of
Wioto Common lying between the
southwesterly extension of the
centerline of Finch lane and the
southwesterly extension of the east
line of said Lot 12.
In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered:
1. The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met.
2. The construction of a single - family home with an attached garage is a reasonable
use of the property and will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. It
is further reasonable that the property owner wants to construct an accessible
home that can accommodate someone with limited mobility.
3. The variance is requested due to circumstances unique to the property and not
due to the actions of the applicant. The lot depth of 40 feet near Finch Lane is half
is what is required by City Code.
4. The applicant has minimized the variance requested by cantilevering only a portion
of the west wall of the home. The applicant has also reduced the home length by 2
feet.
5. Setbacks on the property will be improved as both the front and rear setbacks have
been increased. In addition, the project will eliminate the existing nonconforming
side yard setback.
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, It is anticipated that
the variance request will be reviewed at an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time,
possible dates are Tuesday, May 13, 2014 or Tuesday, May 27, 2014.
NO
Mil
2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364
Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620
Application Fee and scrow Deposit required at time of application.
Planning Commission Date 1� Case No.
City Council Date 2 ;7 IZ
Please type or print legibly
SUBJECT
Address 12Z-9 6i ic4 L4 ,2P,
Lot 2
Block
PROPERTY
LEGAL
DESC.
(/
Subdivision t- 'ea./Vt 1,Jr�n (i
/ 2-q-13-400
PID #, I � 11 l �7 - 10 p
Zoning:
R1 R1A R2 R3 B1 B2 B3 (Circle one)
PROPERTY
Name J2 Ah
Email
OWNER
Address -2 7:Z9' F/rnc44 tsna Amiid
Phone HomeKZ- / 71_- 74/1 Work
Fax
APPLICANT
Nam6uncru6 gargor"S %�t,��l�ndovr
Emaii i0�]nS��1n�WCtwSacrllomkel
i
cpvy
(IF OTHER
Address_5_/-r�A;;i '9¢ Qox 382 ��
/Cl7/I
�I��l /h
/m/ �✓�35�
THAN
OWNER)
G Home 2 -Zdj- l� Work7%(3-y7 ?- ssS✓�Fax
Phone �1 76; V7f s 53"0
4
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure
for this property? Yes X No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s)
and provide copies of resolutions.
3
2—
71-17
or alteration
stories, type of use, etc.):
b" s %vlvti/v b ?wee f gs s6awh irr a1ic�erL �r.�R�r�
Variance Information
(10/2112013) Page 4 of 6 -907-
Case No.
3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning
district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (>�. If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason
for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.):
SETBACKS:
Front Yard: ( N S E/�N )
Side Yard: ( ®S EW )
Side Yard: (NSEW)
Rear Yard: (N S W )
Lakeside: ( N ®E W )
(NSEW)
Street Frontage:
Lot Size:
Hardcover:
Oko -INUM11
�Ci ft.
ft.
u#
ft.
ft.
k6 0 sq ft
33.3,?-sq ft
REQUESTED VARIANCE S�fibau�i
(or existing 3 E%i5� {0.2 w�m in vRr 13- )
ft. M, S? ft.
ft.
ON
ft.
ft.
ft.
�3ys
sq ft
sq ft
ft.
ft.
eft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
sq ft
sq ft
4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is
located? Yes), No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use:
5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the
uses permitted in that zoning district?
( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil
( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation
�) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify
Please describe: ? v �r0 _Yi e-�"�'r r t' ,Vn /' 41/)
Variance Information
(10/21/2013) Page 5 of 6 -90$-
Case No.
6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in
the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No A. If yes, explain:
7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes ( ), No (". If yes, explain:
8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property
described in
this petition? Yes (X), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
9. Comments:
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information
provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized
official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be required by law.
Owner's
Information
(10/21/2013) Page 6 of 6 -909-
Date
f
Date 3 /Z /L_
Second Variance Application
Jesberg 1728 Finch Lane -
The Practical Difficulties associated with the current variance application for the Jesberg
property at 1728 Finch Lane are a result of the previous requirement to narrow the overall house
width to 25 feet to maintain a 5 foot rear (east) set back. This further constrained what was
already a tight house, and resulted in the need for a small one foot cantilevered overhang on the
west wall of the house to ensure safe interior passage in the bedroom, hallway and kitchen for
someone with limited mobility.
Mr. Jesberg is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner permitted by the zoning
ordinance (single family residential home), his plight is due to circumstances unique to this
property and not of his doing (unusual lot shape), and the variance requested will not alter the
essential character of the neighborhood.
Granting the requested variance will not confer on Mr. Jesberg any special privileges denied to
other landowners in the area, nor will it be materially detrimental to other properties in the area.
On the contrary, construction of a new home should help enhance both the aesthetic and market
values of the neighboring properties.
The requested front and rear yard variances are the minimum variances necessary to still
ensure off - street parking in front of Mr. Jesberg's (already shallow) garage, to ensure adequate
fire clearances from the neighboring property (as per a discussion with Building Official Scott
Qualle), and to ensure minimal internal clearances for passage between rooms..
The requested variance should be granted as the resulting new home will be in harmony with the
general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance, and remains consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. in addition, the proposed left (north) side yard setback is further improved
from the previously approved variance, the proposed lakeshore setback remains the same and
in compliance, the rear yard setback remains the same, and the front yard setback remains the
same as measured from the foundation, with only a portion of the main floor wall cantilevered
just one foot..
Lastly, the existing utility easement was reviewed with Public Works Superintendent Ray
Hanson, and a plan devised to replace the existing sewer line to allow for building the new home
as proposed.
Suncrest Builders - 4 -17 -14
Grant Johnson, Co -owner
M11
i
a
•
N s
� y
:9`y mm ro
,N d
d
o
o d
�Q
o I`
Eti
d
Emd
C
Q d y
C N W
�'S Z•
oil,s�
O
�
r
N
/
a � m
P"' ;60 ° ry
OSJ J��v�7
b
n' L
Ile
IV
'Zilz
lip 8 %YJ 90. 08 a.
ex
Nlq. %wV I sy S kgy6 � _
m q
ig m
BO�j y .6 -il/
L oy b o � 4 79, $ �y yONNp SN Nib 1N
1
r
O N
Q Q mm
Q f6 G 0 =�=
�% w z w
•p m o (=C o
m o o
!i oU z-%J _
Y, +� U CV
= m c a" m
i.S
U �
U O C � E 'C �.. •G .Oj 0 LL
co
= hU s
cll
•.e�i�C.a�C.�4i
+! m w w U COA
h'/ 3
ss /
O aQ k3 .. / / zlzl 1Sbc'
A.
m.
/` O / $ /
/ / 3
fA
X
/ C^
i X
"O-x
O
CN V, M 00 M
r` N N
O
U 0 Q
c.,'
v 5
w N a 4c _
Z Q � o
/�&0
V
fR#
r
\
�000 J
C
Z
00
O
N
r
N
v
a
�
E
O
s
o
s
O
O
c
0..
O
t-
O
O
r
y
O
_
m
a
p
w
p..
t
(�6
°
Q
1
00
E
°
m
u.
U
U
U
U
U
U
0
a=
Q
Z
a
P
M
CV)
W
(5
Q
X
a
0
®
o
W
O
J
y
h
h
h
O aQ k3 .. / / zlzl 1Sbc'
A.
m.
/` O / $ /
/ / 3
fA
X
/ C^
i X
"O-x
O
CN V, M 00 M
r` N N
O
U 0 Q
c.,'
v 5
w N a 4c _
Z Q � o
/�&0
V
fR#
r
\
�000 J
�U o
r—t z o
M
L1� �
� H
� a
Z
m m
3 w
�
0) U)
o N N a
w
w
p
W H N t
Q N W r c
O M N
a
a
W 2 £
Z G°W c �~
W M Q t2 m Cl)
(L)CO
iz r N N
O
3 �
N
Z
00
O
d
r
N
v
a
�
� U
O
cL
Cl)
J OL
,
a
a >
y
L
V1
C
a=
Q
a
P
M
CV)
N
N
a
a
0
0
o
C83
O
y
h
h
h
N
S
M
W
�U o
r—t z o
M
L1� �
� H
� a
Z
m m
3 w
�
0) U)
o N N a
w
w
p
W H N t
Q N W r c
O M N
a
a
W 2 £
Z G°W c �~
W M Q t2 m Cl)
(L)CO
iz r N N
O
3 �
N
N b
.YC7 U
m q
w
w
5-
T b N
$oqrA
v
y
00
O
d
r
N
v
a
N b
.YC7 U
m q
w
w
5-
T b N
$oqrA
v
y
RIGHT ELEVATION
LEFT ELEVATION
U.B. copyright law protects original works of authorship, including architectural plans and drawings, as soon as they are first put on paper or some other tangible medium, su -
gives the owner exclusive rights to display, distribute, reproduce and modify the plans /drawings, and the exclusive right to use the plans or drawings to construct a building. We are able to offer Wausau Homes plans under a
license that allows us to construct homes based on these plans, and distribute certain copies for limited purposes relating to our construction of a home. You have been given permission to use these plans /drawings solely in
connection with hiring us to construct a home based on these plans /drawings. Any other use of Wausau Homes plans, such as providing them to another builder or modifying the plans without permission is prohibited. Even
viewing the plans to draw a new, substantially similar plan is a violation of copyright law because copyright protects the expression of an idea, and notjust a particular physical copy of a plan or drawing. Unauthorized use of
copyrighted plans or drawings can lead to significant damages, and a violator may be required to pay the copyright owner for any damages caused and any profits earned by the violator, or in some circumstances may be
hiM, nc ,tirn nnn mar nlan nr rtrnwinn ,,.cart in nn irnnermissible way. In addition, willfully making impermissible use of copyrighted plans and drawings can lead to criminal prosecution.
Wall Bracing
FOUNDATION PLAN /LOWER LEVEL
(COTES
a .e.�.�.n'•a..rc.aw +ru'•tr.ru..rn. c... cv<oux,xo s
= r, e� ,c•w.x,�n ^re......,,,.ab.ab... x .e +n••..°wa„a�.x..xa..
future Finished Footage: 497
8' -0" FOUNDATION WALL
Dimensions are Framing to Framing
`r.�pw
8
wISrRW Bolb B'oc.
.rwk�+na "�a...a..t....umre4ana •ra.wwtp^•s an.®...6wb
6 P orea Wa1 Q 46'
515 eed
� ::enwm`uu`: `e. �v °.zwimnxo w+:wa.a:a..°�,.ew°r�ra •�.o.o�u�w.e.r
d P metl Cancrele Fleor
^COnBnucus 16k8
ComTete footing
- cwrey.tr.maw,w.x'.b.ixneenw tom.�x ®� 5W,[
rm.a.aYw•, rmm.eetr ,wW trrnu�nna•t.iW en„pvbo
�aw•�>L4C
y..xusc ..ansrcu.F�wo
':>awwm'x<n+emwdena... w...ab .e�w�s.ssst. ea.e.`+:mmte•m
xa,e.., rn" ut•� bw r.. x.we. nni.y.r
1fi+°ss W`� ml.rgw. i...aww+.= ".FC.®azvml
tm mw... b.w.aa.blbN•br b as.bn
1¢-
@,,- W Watch D , W.wpr..t%
^113 Fu dWO
^3" Poured Concrete Fbor
^Cortruom 16Y8 "nonc101 Footln
"4 "Dram Tile
W BkeMra 8'- B "o.c.
Coveretl W Brevet aggregate
2�D
SECTION A -A
SECTION C -C
Scale: le" = 1'-IY'
SECTION B -B
is6 Treetea Pkte
M S Boh 8'oc.
4 P.wIe ..kr
4" Pouretl Concrete Fbor
Poured
gi
18" W Watcatc
h BaB Wahryuoofing
R -13 Fmratl Wal
C.Rtr aCencre,e Fbor
4 Draious 1fi Y8 "ConcMeFooting
4-orelni8a
Na e8' -0'b c.
- o...vered Hgravel e8gregale
'a H 5la. .2d"C.... f' Avaa
"4 "Pou dCOnnete Fbor
-Wag ConsWdr
^2of Treat dPlale
WPn 'Botls
'S115eakr
AS Poured Wa1QB4e
M' Pomea Concrete Floor
'C.uRR us 16'x8'
Concrete F..6R,
SECTION D -D
Scak: 3 6" =I -6
'Wal COnsWaeon
^2x6 Knee -a 48"
"2x6 Treated d Pkt e
W Mchm BoYa B' a.c.
PSkr
8
^"o.'uretl Ql8"
W Watch Bop ., Waterproofing
"R -13 Fmretl WA
^3"Pomea 16e Ste Fbor
-4' Draumu 16)8 'Concrete FooEng
"4" Drzinille
W Bkeaers B' -g"
re
a
eo.erea W eravel egeregate
SECTION E -E
Scak: 3!8 " =1'-0
U.S. copyright taw protects original works of authorship, including architectural plans and drawings, as soon as they are first put on paper or some other tangible medium, such as a CD -ROM or computer hard drive. A copyright
gives the owner exclusive rights to display, distribute, reproduce and modify the plans /drawings, and the exclusive right to use the plans or drawings to construct a building. We are able to offer Wausau Homes plans under a
license that allows us to construct homes based on these plans, and distribute certain copies for limited purposes relating to our construction of a home. You have been given permission to use these plans /drawings solely in
connection with hiring us to construct a home based on these plans /drawings. Any other use of Wausau Homes plans, such as providing them to another builder or modifying the plans without permission is prohibited. Even
viewing the plans to draw a new, substantially similar plan is a violation of copyright law because copyright protects the expression of an idea, and not just a particular physical copy of a plan or drawing. Unauthorized use of
copyrighted plans or drawings can lead to significant damages, and a violator may be required to pay the copyright owner for any damages caused and any profits earned by the violator, or in some circumstances may be
PQnY Yirari fn nav statutory damages as high as $150.000 per clan or drawino used in an impermissible way. In addition, willfully making impermissible use of copyrighted plans and drawings can lead to criminal prosecution.
tIY'
51 - -. -.
'16 Treatedb
�w
8
wISrRW Bolb B'oc.
\
6 P orea Wa1 Q 46'
515 eed
\Y
d P metl Cancrele Fleor
^COnBnucus 16k8
ComTete footing
SECTION C -C
Scale: le" = 1'-IY'
SECTION B -B
is6 Treetea Pkte
M S Boh 8'oc.
4 P.wIe ..kr
4" Pouretl Concrete Fbor
Poured
gi
18" W Watcatc
h BaB Wahryuoofing
R -13 Fmratl Wal
C.Rtr aCencre,e Fbor
4 Draious 1fi Y8 "ConcMeFooting
4-orelni8a
Na e8' -0'b c.
- o...vered Hgravel e8gregale
'a H 5la. .2d"C.... f' Avaa
"4 "Pou dCOnnete Fbor
-Wag ConsWdr
^2of Treat dPlale
WPn 'Botls
'S115eakr
AS Poured Wa1QB4e
M' Pomea Concrete Floor
'C.uRR us 16'x8'
Concrete F..6R,
SECTION D -D
Scak: 3 6" =I -6
'Wal COnsWaeon
^2x6 Knee -a 48"
"2x6 Treated d Pkt e
W Mchm BoYa B' a.c.
PSkr
8
^"o.'uretl Ql8"
W Watch Bop ., Waterproofing
"R -13 Fmretl WA
^3"Pomea 16e Ste Fbor
-4' Draumu 16)8 'Concrete FooEng
"4" Drzinille
W Bkeaers B' -g"
re
a
eo.erea W eravel egeregate
SECTION E -E
Scak: 3!8 " =1'-0
U.S. copyright taw protects original works of authorship, including architectural plans and drawings, as soon as they are first put on paper or some other tangible medium, such as a CD -ROM or computer hard drive. A copyright
gives the owner exclusive rights to display, distribute, reproduce and modify the plans /drawings, and the exclusive right to use the plans or drawings to construct a building. We are able to offer Wausau Homes plans under a
license that allows us to construct homes based on these plans, and distribute certain copies for limited purposes relating to our construction of a home. You have been given permission to use these plans /drawings solely in
connection with hiring us to construct a home based on these plans /drawings. Any other use of Wausau Homes plans, such as providing them to another builder or modifying the plans without permission is prohibited. Even
viewing the plans to draw a new, substantially similar plan is a violation of copyright law because copyright protects the expression of an idea, and not just a particular physical copy of a plan or drawing. Unauthorized use of
copyrighted plans or drawings can lead to significant damages, and a violator may be required to pay the copyright owner for any damages caused and any profits earned by the violator, or in some circumstances may be
PQnY Yirari fn nav statutory damages as high as $150.000 per clan or drawino used in an impermissible way. In addition, willfully making impermissible use of copyrighted plans and drawings can lead to criminal prosecution.
Fax= su�a:uua_.g
® Pa Ytrm+h.tr�Y,ariRa "kurk. nu.Yfa•vn 6�.L.IL XOT¢5:
zuronr> ,. a.maw� k..la..r.a.an...nmy..
�c..,aaatrm.am.aa.mM.e
eta M/
..YYm a.®FameY,wltr
mrmar.yk4rtr�F. aWeYlgatlA,65vW rr s6'
auxoW
0 rnu®me
P..a.a.m......wY
..Y..au•' >......uc.mnmm�xo
.m.sas..m.r...oabwm , r....m . ewansw
MYUV ka+,vYptlkg4.trtlb N'.
.dMml VP'aiWer.(ie]Iiywxq
�a.Ym.ak�.a,�ptrame..m.M•..
O uYY.- b.k.O.,a war.Yake...e.m
e .�NYa.ru- �1).aac r�m..k.pm
aw.ma'mn
r�aem.. r+�a,l..eea..e.aere
Y.wLmMlChu.itiSG
me MU ]5'.M Sptr6nv.auW Vtte p.eq.p
.'Lmps.'PryMmvbrbeRma.pmev.tr.
.fa FwamsW Rr]r.1}(e,p)tIl
W a Y.P�e M.ss,,.M Mm I l.iga,(eyjl.
Nlv,tl" ORm W P -k Lrx.ia PM..ISn
Omf�e1Y19HE)
O
(gMlar�1ebWa�rpPmslYgN.1Y
ppm Yre a ryir I m r.tle M M N" .Aert
rRVela A3rYn.
'l ST FLOOR PLAN
Floor Square Footage: 793
Garage Square Footage: 528
NOTES
9' -1 1/8" WALL HEIGHTS
Dimensions are Framing to Framing
2ply 2x10 Sel -Strut Headers (u.n.o.)
eel CifeT!x 6M1inBles
^VV150 Feb0
r5 /32 "OSM1 SbeaS'ngw CLpa
ODE Roo; EOge
�12
Per Elev.I
Per Elegy
s x conaba=5on
We,'
s1.1 wm Eaa=ia cwar
]Po' AL m SvHi1 Panel GUI
Afpn12 "vab
W FOVMa6l,
TYPICAL WALL SECTION
scale: vz^ = r -a'
lion Ot
i.Feftwrel UraTlmre smngba
nse Ean 'All -«oa
5/,P .O SvPIna W CYps 12 pranrv'n
OOE RVO Eape r� all elovm HpI&- lreutrtlon
Per Elev.l / woMrmsaea lea "o-c)
LPer Elev
5� -
vo sib -Faa,
sc-a wm. Faaaa co.er
s'S' A1um soul penal Icvl
pupalm mb
W Fo�umwa
GARAGE WALL SECTION
Scale: 172" = 1' -0"
m�
op
1 l
O N
C >
_aaa
5I0 "SM1eetrvck
y0coomol ,
lmsneee ck
SI6 "F.G Sbeebvck�WG Wa®
E
Oab emri
1 5I3Z 0 16" "rior S�
House wap
sand
'Basement WaOCOnab�eWn
36 ireema Ph1e MM -Mr Bella B' ou.
WPou kr
B "POUmtl. —ra. "wl WarcM1 DOg mhProvfilrp
4" Pouretl Cancnb Fbw
6M!PolyvaWrfieMOr
Cm @uow 16Xd Cencreb Faobp
m2
d Of
2 E
�U
bmAOn
Am PCroper Ven6
fl.5g Blcvn Fibergass lnsubeon
woos Tmsaea 12aoy
cekna cvaa a�=eo.•
sal vapor Ea-aar
510 "$Ileebock yr
12'NO -Sag sM1eetrxk
WJ Lueubae
12 "SMetrock
&W Vepm8.mor
R 21 FIWOhea lauhnon
Il aLtls 16'x.0.
15AZ "osa Ftlerior SAeaPinp
Hvwe Wrap
SNg
'Flaorc uauc4on
2 M OSb Tfl. 6lwaMing
Spray fvam5911nsuhlion
Opavneli2 "sM1eebock
�eaeemnlwauewo-uamn
Zb ireabtl PYm wl NwMr BoXa B' o.c.
nkr
B" Powetl Nhtl � B6 "w/ WaOM1 Dog
WaferymoNp
R- 1]FUnea Well
3' PoureE ColcnY Fbvr
fimll Poly W Wr Bamor
cwmnmua 1Bre' conmm Fvwnp
r or.m rY wl aYeaa�a 6m a �.
cooerea wr ®arol aggrepam
U.S. copyright law protects original works of authorship, including architectural plans and drawings, as soon as they are first put on paper or some other tangible medium, Such as a uu -Kum or cornpul tidw uttvc. n l-upyl ly1 t6
gives the owner exclusive rights to display, distribute, reproduce and modify the plans /drawings, and the exclusive right to use the plans or drawings to construct a building. We are able to offer Wausau Homes plans under a
license that allows us to construct homes based on these plans, and distribute certain copies for limited purposes relating to our construction of a home. You have been given permission to use these plans /drawings solely in
connection with hiring us to construct a home based on these plans /drawings. Any other use of Wausau Homes plans, such as providing them to another builder or modifying the plans without permission is prohibited. Even
viewing the plans to draw a new, substantially similar plan is a violation of copyright law because copyright protects the expression of an idea, and notjust a particular physical copy of a plan or drawing. Unauthorized use of
copyrighted plans or drawings can lead to significant damages, and a violator may be required to pay the copyright owner for any damages caused and any profits earned by the violator, or in some circumstances may be
e rfoRe ,n �« cr�rltrnn, ri�mnnpc nc hinh nQ 1;iti-c;n nnn nor nian nr rirawinn triad in an impermissible way. In addition, willfully making impermissible use of copyrighted plans and drawings can lead to criminal prosecution.
O
�R e
wa �
aNn
3mx
1 _ �
1
EB
`a
c
er,
GARAGE STAIR DETAIL
SCALE: 3/8" = 1' -0" (22x34)
3/16" = 1' -0" (11x17)
MOTES
8' -1 1/8" WALL HEIGHTS
Dimensions are Framing to Fran
2piy 2x10 Sel -Strut Headers (u.
2ND FLOOR PLAN
Ftoor Square Footage: 464
SCALE: 3/8" = 1' -0" (22x34) m
3/16" = 1' -0" (11x17)
-- ---- ------ - - - -II
i I l
I I
Roof Plan Vier
Scale: 1/8" = 1' -0" (22x34) ----------------
l
1116 " = 1,_0" (11x17) tr - - - -- -- - - - -��
I �I II III
-- - — - — - —
U.S. copyright law protects original works of authorship, including architectural plans and drawings, as soon as they are first put on paper or some other tangible medium, such as a ✓u K�IVI of wtltN�dcl tla u •�. ^ ��rJ' e'°
gives the owner exclusive rights to display, distribute, reproduce and modify the plans /drawings, and the exclusive right to use the plans or drawings to construct a building. We are able to offer Wausau Homes plans under a
license that allows us to construct homes based on these plans, and distribute certain copies for limited purposes relating to our construction of a home. You have been given permission to use these plans /drawings solely in
connection with hiring us to construct a home based on these plans /drawings. Any other use of Wausau Homes plans, such as providing them to another builder or modifying the plans without permission is prohibited. Even
viewing the plans to draw a new, substantially similar plan is a violation of copyright law because copyright protects the expression of an idea, and not just a particular physical copy of a plan or drawing. Unauthorized use of
copyrighted plans or drawings can lead to significant damages, and a violator may be required to pay the copyright owner for any damages caused and any profits earned by the violator, or in some circumstances may be
k;-k z- C', an nnn . ®r .,tom., ^r nrau,;nn item in nn imnarmicSihle way. In addition, willfully making impermissible use of copyrighted plans and drawings can lead to criminal prosecution.
REV2
OATS:
REVS
GATE:
ti
c
c
o m
m U)
oW
2 —)
DBVm By
Jess B.
Date:
2/14/2014
13x7 SMfe:
29134 Stale:
1' -0"
Or L)
IV- 14
AM
AM
AM
AM 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
MEMORANDUM
May 8, 2014
To: City Mayor and City Council
From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer
Re: Electric and Gas Franchise Fees
Request to extend the period for the Sunset Clause
At the August 20, 2013 budget workshop, the Council approved, in concept, a two year budget
for 2014 and 2015. Both the 2014 and 2015 budgets assumed the City will receive Local
Government Aid and electric and gas franchise fees.
Electric franchise fees generate $147,000, gas franchise fees $125,000, and cable franchise fees
$105,000, a portion of which is given to the LMCC for programming and services.
Staff requests the approval of the attached ordinance amending Appendix A of the Mound City
Code in order to extend the sunset dates until December 31, 2016. There are publication and
communication requirements to extend the sunset date and pushing it out until 2016 instead of
2015 is a recognition the fees cannot be totally eliminated in the near future. The amount of the
fees for 2015 and 2016 will be discussed during the budget process and can be amended at any
time. Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
-917-
printed on recycled paper
CITY OF MOUND
ORDINANCE NO. -2014
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A. OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT
RELATES TO ELECTRIC AND GAS FRANCHISE FEES
The City of Mound does ordain:
That Appendix A. FRANCHISES, Article 11. ELECTRIC FRANCHISE FEES, Sec. 8 be
amended to read as follows:
Sec. 8. Sunset Clause. The ordinance from which this article is derived shall
automatically sunset on D ° ^° ber 31, 2014 December 31, 2016, unless the City
Council acts to renew or extend the fee at least six (6) months prior to the sunset date.
The City Council may unilaterally renew or extend the fee on the same terms and
conditions. Without waiver of any rights under Minnesota law, the City Council shall
seek agreement from company if the city intends to change the fee rate or fee design.
That Appendix A. FRANCHISES, Article IV GAS FRANCHISE FEES, Sec. 8 be
amended to read as follows:
Sec. 8. Sunset Clause. The ordinance from which this article is derived shall
automatically sunset on n ^ ^ ^^ beF 41 2014 December 31, 2016, unless the City
Council acts to renew or extend the fee at least six (6) months prior to the sunset date.
The City Council may unilaterally renew or extend the fee on the same terms and
conditions. Without waiver of any rights under Minnesota law, the City Council shall
seek agreement from company if the city intends to change the fee rate or fee design.
Passed by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2014.
Mayor Mark Hanus
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Published in The Laker on the 24th day of May, 2014.
Effective on the 25 th day of May, 2014.
CITY OF MOUND
7 � .Y�7 i [ iTl l� [ �) ► f [ �
AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN
ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound has adopted Ordinance No. -2014
amending Appendix A of the Mound City Code as it relates to electric and gas franchise fees; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, subdivision 4, allows publication by
title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances; and
WHEREAS, the following summary of Ordinance _ -2014 has been approved by the
City Council of the City of Mound as clearly informing the public of the intent and effect of the
Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound has
reviewed the following summary of the ordinance and approved its publication in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, subdivision 4:
Ordinance _ -2014 has been approved by the City Council of the City of Mound. The
Ordinance amends Appendix A of the Mound City Code as it relates to electric and gas
franchise fees by changing the Sunset Clause dates of December 31, 2014 to December
31, 2016. The electric and gas franchise fees will automatically expire on this date unless
the City Council acts to renew or extend the fee at least six (6) months prior to the sunset
date. A copy of the full text of the ordinance is available at City Hall and at the Mound
Public Library.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk keep a copy of the entire text of the
ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post of the entire text of the
ordinance at Westonka Public Library in the City.
Passed by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
-919-
Mayor Mark Hanus
Hennepin County Assessor Department
To: City of Mound, Mayor and Council
From: Kari Kamrath, Appraiser
Date: March 10, 2014
612 348 -3046, Phone
612 348 -8751, Fax
www.hennepin.us
Re: 2014 Assessment and Board of Appeal and Equalization
The 2014 Mound Open Book meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 7th, from 5 to
7:00 p.m. In preparation for the upcoming Open Book Meeting, please find the
enclosed data to help you. There is market data, explanation of the market conditions
adjustment, local board procedures, an alternate method of appeal and sales photos
with characteristics from a sample of sales throughout the city.
Annual Revaluation, Sales, and New Construction Reviews
Each year, one fifth of the properties in the city are reviewed and the records are
updated. For the 2014 assessment we viewed all residential and lakeshore properties
in the southeast portion of Mound, in section 19, 25 and 30. The lakeshore properties
were located on Phelps Bay, Spring Park Bay and a few properties on Cook's Bay (See
2014 Reval Map) The viewing, reviewing, and statistical analysis of all sales that sold
between October 1, 2012 and September 30, 2013 in the city of Mound were made.
Summary of the 2014 Assessment
Each year the estimated market values are analyzed along with sales data from the
market. A recalculation of land and building values were made to all property types.
The results of the adjustments for the following property types are:
Residential
+15.8%
Condos
+17.9%
Residential Lakeshore
+5.3%
Townhouses
+9.9%
Commercial /Industrial
+0.7%
Double Bungalow's
+16.9%
Apartments
+3.0%
Residential Zero Lot Line
+10.0%
There are 4,472 taxable parcels in the city with a total market value of approximately
$1,059,154,400. This value includes $9,192,500 in new construction improvements.
The overall gross value increase for all property types including improvements in the
city of Mound is 10.7 %.
-920 -
1
The Local Board of Appeal and Equalization and Open Book Processes
Value notices will be mailed at the beginning of March. Taxpayers with value or
classification concerns should contact the assessor's office. During the initial
conversation the property owner may discuss their concerns and review sales
information with an appraiser. The majority of the callers are satisfied after a
conversation with an appraiser. If additional attention is necessary the appraiser will
review the property.
The board has the authority to increase, decrease, or take no action on individual
valuations. The total reduction must not reduce the aggregate assessment by more
than one percent or none of the adjustments will be allowed. The board also, cannot
increase or decrease by a percentage of all assessments in a district by class. If the
board chooses to reconvene it must do so within 20 days. A majority of the board
members are required to attend all local board meetings. Enclosed are additional duties
and information for local boards as provided by the Minnesota Property Tax
Administrators Manual, which is prepared by the Minnesota Department of Revenue
Property Tax Division.
The City of Mound has decided to use the alternative method to the formal Local Board
of Appeal and Equalization meeting held by the city council and mayor and hold an
informal open book meeting. During an open book meeting, the valuation and
classification issues are handled by the assessor's staff on a one -on -one basis with the
property owner. The open book meeting allows property owners to address questions
about their property assessment directly to the assessing staff.
Homeowners should still call the number listed on their value notice in March to address
questions and set up interior inspections prior to the open book meeting. If
homeowners concerns are addressed prior to the open book meeting and the
homeowner is satisfied with the results, the homeowner would not need to attend the
open book meeting. If the homeowner is unsatisfied with the results of their property
value or classification after speaking with an assessor they can appeal their value to the
County Board of Appeal and Equalization.
In order for a taxpayer to appeal to the county board they must first appeal to the local
board either in person or in writing. The County Board of Appeal and Equalization will
begin meeting on June 16, 2014. All requests for appointments at the County Board
must be received before May 21, 2014. To make an appointment, taxpayers should call
612 - 348 -7050.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Kari Kamrath at 612- 803 -0860.
-921 .
2
Market Conditions Adjustment for Sales Ratio Studies
March 11, 2014
The purpose of this document is to review the reasons that the market conditions adjustments in sales
ratio studies are considered, discuss calculating time trends [TCALC], apply the time trend to the sales in
the study period [MCAP], and list additional resources.
Market Conditions
While the market conditions adjustment is sometimes referred to as a "time" adjustment, time is not
the cause for the adjustment. Overtime, changes in interest rates, supply and demand, employment
rates, availability of financing, and other factors can create conditions in the market that must be
adjusted.
Purpose
As stated in MS 272.03, subdivision 8, "'Market value' means the usual selling price at the place where
the property to which the term is applied shall be at the time of assessment ... and,
As stated in MS 273.01, All real property subject to taxation shall be listed ... with reference to their
value on January 2 ...
Simply put, the assessor is to value all property on January 2nd at the value it would sell considering all
market conditions. Assessors value all properties using mass appraisal techniques and one of the
measurements of mass appraisal are the numerous statistics derived from sales ratio studies. Sales
ratio studies can be of any duration of time but the 12 month State Board ratio is considered the most
important in setting and analyzing the annual assessment. In Hennepin County, all of our assessment
measurements are set to reflect the State Board 12 month sales ratio.
With sales occurring throughout the 12 month study period and the estimated market value being set
according to the current market conditions as of January 2nd, by using a market conditions or "time"
factor to adjust the sale price to the date of the assessment will reflect any changes in the market.
Market conditions adjusted sales prices are also necessary to reduce the distortion that the market can
have on ratios and other statistics. Using market conditions adjustments is not only using generally
accepted appraisal principals, but the IAAO identifies a "time" adjustment as a necessary component of
any sales ratio study and MS 270.12 subd 2 requires the DOR to follow the standards set by the IAAO.
For the 2012 assessment the DOR instituted the market conditions adjusted sales ratio methodology for
calculating State Board sales ratios for a number of reasons:
• MS 278.05 (4) states that sales must be adjusted to reflect the difference in date of sale
compared to the assessment date
Tax Court ratios already are adjusted for market conditions
21 month state aid ratios already are adjusted for market conditions
e Generally accepted appraisal principals indicate that in the sales comparison approach one of
the first adjustments considered is for market conditions
IAAO standards indentify that time adjustments are necessary for accurate ratio studies
e The DOR by statute, must follow IAAO guidelines whenever practical
Market Conditions Adjustment for Sales Ratio Studies Page 1
-922-
3
TCALC
The market conditions adjustment is determined through a time trend calculator or TCALC. The TCALC is
determined by the sales from a 21 month time period that starts 24 months prior to the assessment
year under study. For the 2014 assessment, sales from January 2012 through September 2013 are used
in the analysis of market conditions. If the jurisdiction has an adequate sample of 30 or more sales and
the confidence level of the data is greater than 90% then a time adjustment is applied to the sales in the
12 month State Board study period. These sales are adjusted to the assessment date under study, in
this case January 2, 2014,
MCAP
After the sales are adjusted for market conditions with the appropriate TCALC to determine the market
condition adjusted price or MCAP. The MCAP is the adjusted sales price that is used in all sales ratios.
What happens if the TCALC is Zero?
Several situations can occur to result in a TCALC of zero. The market could be flat with no market
condition changes, the confidence level is less than 90.0 %, not an adequate sample, and others.
Hennepin County will continue to review assessments based on the preferred MCAP sales ratio analysis
and the former method of measuring the direct ratio with growth.
The Ideal Assessment
The ideal assessment would be when the median and mean sales ratio by property type and residential
umbrella for both the direct sales ratio analysis and the MCAP sales ratio analysis are at 95.0% All
median sales ratios must be within the DOR specifications of 90.0% and 105.0 %. An assessment with a
MCAP median ratio less than 90.0% or greater than 105.0% would NOT meet standards and would be
subject to State Board changes. In addition to median ratios, additional review of other statistical
measures including COD and PRD must also be considered.
In Conclusion
Our assessment model has always been to consider the sales in the study period, these may now be
adjusted for market conditions. We also consider sales that have closed after the study period, current
pending sales, and active listings to arrive at our current assessed values.
The larger the range between the TCALC and the property type growth, the larger the range between
the median MCAP sales ratio and the median direct sales ratio. This will result in some properties
having direct ratios higher than their recent sales price. This is nothing new!
At the parcel level when you are question on a value it is still all about sales, sales, and sales. What data
do you have to support the value of the property for 2014, it is not about the change in value from the
year before, it is not about what value the CAMA system reported, it is only about what that property
would sell for on January 2, 2104 and what is your support!
Good customer service would include verifying that our physical attributes on file are correct, perform a
sales comparison grid with appropriate time adjustment, follow generally accepted appraisal principals,
and continue to educate that with constantly changing markets, assessed values can be higher or lower
than past sales.
Market Conditions Adjustment for Sales Ratio Studies Page 2
-923-
4
With the MCAP Sales Ratios — What has changed?
• State Board ratios will be based on current assessment
• Assessments will be current with no lag in market trends
• All sales have equal weight in median ratio calculations
• Sales are no longer lost in unique submarkets
• All sales ratios will be in alignment — State Board and Tax Court and 21 month Schools Aids
• Consistent with IAAO standards
• Consistent with appraisal principals
• Higher quality assessments
• More equalized assessments.
Resources
DOR Fact Sheets
Property Tax Administrators Manual
PACE Course Module 6 —Time Adjustments for Sales Ratios
IAAO — Standard on Ratio Studies — April 2013
Minnesota Statutes
Market Conditions Adjustment for Sales Ratio Studies Page 3
-924-
5
Mound Quintile Map
M
2012
Summer 2011
2013
Summer 2012
2014
Summer 2013
2015
Summer 2014
2016
Summer 2015
-925-
6
• Module #8
• Assessment Reviews, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction
• Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual
Section: Assessment Appeal Process
Open Book Meetings
This version of appeal is an organized approach to address individual appeals in a less formal manner than
the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. The assessor sets aside a time (generally during the months of
April and May) and place to meet with citizens individually to discuss their specific concerns about their
properties. These meetings are generally an alternative to the local board meeting but they can be held in
addition to local boards. Taxpayers often find them less intimidating than presenting their appeal to the
Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. They often appreciate the fact that they can have their questions
answered in a more private setting and not have to be apprehensive about making a presentation in front of
their friends and neighbors. In a one -on -one setting, property owners may spend more as much time with
the appraiser as they need. They can compare the value of their home with the values of similar homes and
review similar homes that have sold.
The process is very efficient because concerns and questions are often resolved immediately. Property
owners can see that the appraiser collects the same information on all properties, reassuring them that the
process is the same for everyone, and they have not been singled out for a value increase.
If the taxpayer and assessor continue to disagree after the open book meeting, the taxpayer may choose to
proceed to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting (if one is held in addition to the open book
meeting) or to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting (if there is no local board meeting).
Ultimately, the taxpayer may choose to pursue an appeal to Tax Court.
There are several different procedures for open book meetings. Some counties hold countywide open book
meetings at one or more locations over a set time period, often during both daytime and evening hours.
The dates, times, and locates of all meetings appear on the valuation notices. Taxpayers can attend any of
the locations at any time and meet with an appraiser to discuss their valuations and/or classifications.
Property records and value information is brought to any offsite meetings or accessed via laptop computers.
Other counties hold open book meetings for specific jurisdictions. Taxpayers in these jurisdictions are
notified of the date and time of the meeting on their valuation notices. These meetings may take place at a
public facility in that jurisdiction or at the county offices. All of the property information is brought to the
meeting or accessed via laptop computers if the meeting is held offsite.
If a county allows for countywide open book meetings but still has some jurisdictions with traditional Local
Board of Appeal and Equalization meetings, the taxpayers in those jurisdictions may attend the open book
meetings, but it is not required. The taxpayer may choose to appeal directly to the Local Board of Appeal
and Equalization. Of the taxpayer does attend the open book meeting and the taxpayer and assessor
continue to disagree, the taxpayer can appeal to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization.
If the taxpayer and assessor continue to disagree on the market value or classification after meeting at the
open book meeting, the taxpayer is free to attend the County Board of Appeal and Equalization (unless
there is a local board, in which case, the taxpayer must appeal there first).
Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction a Assessment Appeal Process Page
last Revision; September2013 7
-926 -
7
Module #8 ■
Assessment Review, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction
Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual ■
Section: The Assessment Appeal Process
Assessor's Role at the Open Book Meetine
The assessor must handle each and every appeal presented at the open book meeting. County assessor
offices may choose to show each taxpayer a short presentation about the assessment and property tax
process, how the assessor arrives at the estimated market value and how values have changed in the
jurisdiction over the past year.
The office should have documentation procedures in place so taxpayer appeals can be recorded and
addressed. In cases where changes are made, the assessor will need to document these changes and their
rationale, and make sure the changes are reflected for that assessment. The office should also have
procedures in place for notifying taxpayers of any changes that result from the open book meeting. This
notification is important because any changes to the assessment made during the open book process may be
further appealed by the taxpayer to the local or county boards, or to Tax Court.
If a taxpayer comes to the open book meeting to discuss issues and the property has not been recently
inspected by someone in the assessor's office, an appointment to view the property, both interior and
exterior, should be scheduled. The ultimate role for the assessor at the open book meeting is to be sure all
questions are addressed and that clear information is shared with property owners. The open book meeting
can be an avenue to improve public relations.
Page Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction . Assessment Appeal Process
8 Last Revision: September 2013
-927-
8
• Module #8
• Assessment Review, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction
• Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual
Section: Assessment Appeal Process
Local Board of Appeal and Equalization
The purpose of the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization (LBAE) is to provide a fair and
objective forum for property owners to appeal their valuations and/or classifications. The local
board often serves as the first formal step to the appeals process. Effective actions taken by the local
board may potentially make a direct contribution to attaining assessment equality. The local board
must address property owners' issues efficiently, fairly, and objectively and can only make changes
that are substantiated by facts and that meet statutory guidelines. Any changes must be justified
because they have the effect of shifting the tax burden to other properties in the jurisdiction.
Assessors should not make changes to property within the 10 -day "window" between notices of
valuation and classification being sent and the date of Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. If an
assessor feels that a change to valuation or classification needs to be made between the time that
notices are sent out and the board convenes, the assessor must notify the property owner at least ten
days before bringing the issue before the board, thereby to give the property owner a chance to
appear before the board as well.
Ordinarily, the LBAE is made up of the city council or township board; it can also be a specially
appointed board if a city charter provides for one. Some jurisdictions choose to hold open book
meetings in lieu of LBAE meetings and still others choose to transfer their local board duties to the
County Board of Appeal and Equalization. The county assessor sets a day and time for each LBAE
meeting providing each jurisdiction must be notified in writing on or before February 15 of each
year. The clerk is responsible for giving published and posted notice of the meeting at least 10 days
before the meeting. The publishing typically occurs in the local newspaper of the jurisdiction, and
posting typically occurs in the city or town hall. An example of such notice is included at the end of
this section. Meetings shall be held between April 1 and May 31 of each year. These meetings are
public and must adhere to open meeting laws.
The LBAE meets at the office of the clerk to review the valuations and classifications of properties
within the jurisdiction. The assessor must be present to answer any questions and present evidence
supporting their values and/or classifications. The county assessor, or delegate, must also attend. In
order to appeal to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization, a property owner must first appeal
to the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization, if one is held.
The meeting may recess from day to day until they finish hearing the cases presented, but must
adjourn within 20 days. A longer period may be approved by the Commissioner of Revenue. The
board must apply in writing for an extension; and the commissioner's approval is necessary to
legalize any proceedings subsequent to the expiration of the 20 -day period. The commissioner will
not extend the time for LBAEs to convene in June. No action may be taken by the board after May
31. All complaints heard after the initial 20 -day period (unless extended by the commissioner) or
any complaints brought forth after May 31 must be appealed to the County Board of Appeal and
Equalization.
Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction . Assessment Appeal Process Page
Last Revision: September 7013 9
Module #8 ■
Assessment Review, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction
Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual ■
Section: The Assessment Appeal Process
Board members may not participate in any actions of the board which result in market value
adjustments or classification changes to property owned by the board member, the board member's
spouse, parent, stepparent, child, stepchild, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, uncle, aunt,
nephew, or niece, or to any property in which the board member has a financial interest. Any
relation may be by blood or by marriage. If such conflict arises, the remaining board may elect to
hear the appeal, if a quorum and trained member remain. Otherwise, no change shall be made to the
property, and the property owner shall be eligible to appear before the County Board of Appeal and
Equalization.
Taxpayers may appeal in person, in writing, or by representative. If a taxpayer fails to appeal in
person, in writing, or by representative to appeal the valuation and /or classification of property, that
person may not appeal to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization. This does not apply if an
assessment was made after the local board meeting or if the taxpayer can establish not having
received the notice of market value at least five days before the meeting.
Local Board Training Requirements
Beginning with the 2006 LBAEs, Minnesota law required at least one member of each local board
must have attended training provided by the Department of Revenue within the last four years. The
legislation was enacted in response to complaints taxpayers made after attending local board
meetings. For example, some taxpayers complained that local boards held meetings without having
a quorum of members present, the felt that appealing to the local board was a confrontational
experience, and in response to taxpayer appeals, and some local board members simply claimed that
they "didn't know anything about property values." The training was required in an effort to reduce
these complaints and improve this step of the appeal process for taxpayers.
The training is offered numerous times statewide each year. Each region of the state is allowed to
schedule up to five trainings as they see fit to meet the needs of their local boards. The statewide
schedule is posted on the department's website so board members may attend a course that is most
convenient. Attendees must pre - register for courses so that proper materials and facilities can be
arranged. This also ensures the course is provided in the most effective manner. If attendees do not
pre - register, they may be able to attend the course by registering on -site and paying an on -site
registration fee, provided there is space available. There are also specially - scheduled "catch up"
courses each year which follow local elections for board members who are newly - elected to office.
The handbook and course, developed by the department, explain the role of the board in the
assessment process, the legal and policy reasons for fair and impartial appeal and equalization
hearings, board meeting procedures that foster fair and impartial assessment reviews and other best
practices recommendations, quorum requirements for boards, and explanations of alternate methods
of appeal.
The course is instructed by property tax compliance officers from the department, and is usually
about three hours in length. It includes a presentation and a review of the handbook that details the
procedures and responsibilities of the board. This material is also available on the department's
Page Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction - Assessment Appeal Process
10 Last Revision: September 2013
-929-
10
• Module #8
• Assessment Review, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction
• Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual
Section: Assessment Appeal Process
website. In 2012, this training was combined with the required training for County Board of Appeal
and Equalization members.
If a local board intends to hold an LBAE meeting but fails to meet the training or quorum
requirement, the assessor should take over the meeting as an open book meeting. Any taxpayer may
appeal to the County Board of Appeal and Equalization if not satisfied with the outcome of the open
book meeting.
If a local board does not meet this training requirement or did not have a quorum for the year, their
powers are also transferred to the county board for the following assessment year. This transfer of
authority for failure to meet these requirements must be identified on the following year's Notice of
Valuation and Classification and some procedure for the initial review of assessments (such as an
open book meeting) must be made available. In order of the local board to be reinstated, it must
prove compliance with the requirements and present the county assessor with a resolution by
December I of the year following the violation to be effective for the next assessment year.
For example, if a local board does not have a trained member present for the 2014 LBAE meetings,
the assessor will take over the 2014 meeting as an open book meeting. The jurisdiction will lose
their LBAE for the 2014 and 2015 assessments. In order to get it back for the 2016 assessment, the
jurisdiction must have someone trained and provide the assessor with a resolution by December 1,
2015.
Primary Statutory Reference: 274.01;274.014
Recommendations for Board Members
It is recommended that assessors prepare board members ahead of the LBAE meeting to allow them
to become familiar with local market activity for the year. The assessor should also provide sales
information in advance of the meeting. Other helpful information may includes sales ratio studies by
type of property, valuation schedules for land types, valuation information for the district, statutory
classification information and corresponding class rates, review of value changes by property type in
the district.
Local Board Powers and Duties
Generally, a local board determines whether all taxable property in the city or town has been
properly placed on the current assessment rolls and property valued and classified by the assessor.
Specifically, LBAEs have the following duties:
• Establish a quorum - a majority of the voting members must be in attendance at both the
initial meeting and any reconvene meetings for any valid actions to be taken;
• Reduce the value of a property if market evidence warrants a reduction. The board may not
make an individual market value adjustment that would benefit the property owner if the
property owner has refused access to the assessor to inspect the property (both interior and
exterior);
Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction - Assessment Appeal Process Page
Last Revision: 5eptember1013 11
-930-
„
Module #8 0
Assessment Review, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction
Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual ■
Section: The Assessment Appeal Process
• Increase the value of a property if market evidence warrants an increase or if improvements
are missing from the property record, provided that the taxpayer is notified of the board's
intent to increase to the value so that they may be allowed an opportunity to appeal;
• Correct the classification of a property. The board may not make a classification adjustment
that would the property owner if the property owner has refused access to the assessor to
inspect the property;
• Add omitted properties to the assessment rolls;
• Personal property assessments are also within the board's jurisdiction. Personal property
includes manufactured homes, storage sheds, or similar improvements located in a
manufactured home park, and structures on leased public land and railroad operating right -
of -way;
• Consider and act upon any complaints or objections by taxpayers. Complaints may be made
via letter, in person, or by representative.
No changes in valuation or classification which are intended to correct errors in judgment by the
county assessor may be made by the county assessor after the board has adjourned.
Any changes which are corrections that are merely clerical in nature or to extend homestead
treatment may be made after the board adjourns but must be made via abatement. All changes must
be made available for public review and must also be reported to the county board by no later than
December 31 of that same assessment year. Abatements will be discussed in greater detail later in
this module.
There are also several restrictions and limitations placed on LBAEs. A local board:
• Cannot consider any prior year assessments;
• Cannot act on individual tax amounts;
• Cannot order changes to entire classes of property (by a blanket percentage);
• Cannot make individual reductions that would reduce the aggregate assessment of a
jurisdiction to decrease by more than one percent. If the total reductions would lower the
aggregate assessments made by the assessor by more than one percent, none of the
adjustments made by the board are valid. (The assessor shall correct any clerical errors or
double assessments discovered by the board without regard to the one percent limitation.);
• Cannot increase a person's market value without duly notifying the person of the intent and
allowing the taxpayer an opportunity to appeal;
• Cannot exempt property;
• Cannot make changes benefitting a property owner who refuses entry by the assessor;
• Cannot continue a meeting beyond 20 days from the time it convenes without specific
approval from the Commissioner of Revenue;
• Individual board members cannot participate in changes to property owned by relatives or
property in which the member has a financial interest;
• Cannot grant inclusion into special programs such as Green Acres, Open Space, Disabled
Veterans Homestead Market Value Exclusion, etc.
Page Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction • Assessment Appeal Process
12 Last Revision: 5eptember2013
-931-
12
• Module #8
• Assessment Review, Appeals/ Equalization, and Correction
• Minnesota Property Tax Administrator's Manual
Section: Assessment Appeal Process
Primary Statutory References: 274.01; 274.014; 274.03
Special Board of Appeal and Equalization
The council or governing body of any city may appoint a special board of appeal and equalization to
which it may delegate all of the powers and duties of a local board of appeal and equalization. The
special board shall serve at the direction and discretion of the appointing body, subject to the rules
and restrictions as any other LBAE. The appointing body shall determine the number of members,
the compensation and expenses to be paid, and the term of office of each member. At least one
member of the special board must be an appraiser, Realtor, or other person familiar with property
valuation in the assessment district. At least one member must also have met the training
requirements for LBAE members.
Primary Statutory References: 274.01
Duties of the clerk
The town or city clerk has the following duties relating to LBAEs:
• work with the county assessor to establish meeting dates for the board
• coordinate with the board to ensure a quorum and trained member will be present
• publish and post notice of meetings at least ten days prior to the date of the meeting
• have a sign -in sheet for all appellants
• take minutes as part of town or city record
• return all necessary records to the county assessor in a timely manner
• An example ofpublished/posted notice for local boards of appeal and equalization is such:
Important Notice Regarding Assessment and Classification of Property
This may affect your [#YEAR #] property tax payments.
Notice is hereby given that the Board of Appeal and Equalization of the [City/ Township] shall
meet on [date], [time], at [location]. The purpose of this meeting is to determine whether
taxable property in the city has been properly valued and classified by the assessor, and also to
determine whether corrections need to be made.
If you believe the value or classification of your property is incorrect, please contact your
assessor's office to discuss your concerns. If you are still not satisfied with the valuation or
classification after conferring with your assessor, you may appear before the local board of
appeal and equalization. The board shall review the valuation, classification, or both if
necessary, and shall correct it as needed. Generally, an appearance before your local board of
appeal and equalization is required by law before an appeal can be taken to your county board
of appeal and equalization.
Assessment Review, Appeals /Equalization, and Correction • Assessment Appeal Process Page
Last Revision. September 2013 13
-932-
13
MINNESOTA- REVENUE
My House is Worth What?
Tax Fact Sheet 14
Why doesn't the assessor's value reflect the
sale price of my property?
1. There is a lag between the time of the assessment and
when the sale takes place.
An appraisal is an estimate of property value based on
historical data at a set point in time — January 2 of each year
— and the market can change dramatically by the time the
property is sold.
For example, consider a property valued at $180,000 as of
January 2, 2007. This assessment is based on home sales
that occurred between October 2005 and September 2006.
However, the property may sell for $230,000 in August
2007. Does this mean the estimated value is incorrect? Not
necessarily. It could signal an upturn in the housing market
between September 2006 and August 2007, raising the sale
price of the home.
Just as buyers in rapidly accelerating markets may pay
significantly more than the assessor's last valuation, they
may also pay less in declining markets. A property valued
by the assessor at $200,000 for the 2007 assessment may
sell for $175,000 in August 2007.
This lag time often results in a dramatic difference between
actual sale prices and the estimated market values for the
current year.
2. Properties can change over time.
While values can fluctuate on an annual basis due to sales
of similar properties, Minnesota law requires that properties
only be inspected once every five years, unless new
construction or demolition takes place. Between those
inspections, properties may be improved without the owner
obtaining a building permit — or they may deteriorate if
neglected. These changes can be difficult for assessors,
who may only see the exterior of the home, to consider in
their annual evaluations.
3. There is no "correct" price for real estate —but
rather a range of prices.
The ultimate sale price of a particular property depends on
its unique characteristics as well as the complex
Property Tax Division - Mail Station 3340 - St. Paul, MN 55146 -3340
Revised 4108
-933-
14
www.taxes.state.mn.us
motivations and preferences of the seller and potential
buyers. If that weren't the case, Realtors and sellers would
never have to reduce listing prices, offers from multiple
buyers would all be identical, and professional appraisals
would all arrive at the same value. In reality, list prices
often misjudge the market, offers are negotiable and can
vary widely, and appraised values may be disputed.
4. No two parcels of property are identical.
Estimating the precise value of a property that is based on
dozens, if not hundreds, of characteristics is very difficult.
Even nearly identical properties (e.g. adjacent townhomes
or condominiums) often sell for different amounts.
5. Real estate markets are highly localized and always
changing.
Sale prices of different types of properties can vary widely.
Currently, farmland and recreational properties are rising in
value and sales are strong, but residential sales are stable or
slightly declining in several areas. Some neighborhoods are
declining at a much faster rate than other areas, which may
be stable or slightly increasing in value.
6. Fewer sales mean more challenges for assessors.
In many markets and for many types of property, there are
few sales of comparable properties. This can make
accurate market assessments more difficult, but the assessor
must still use his/her professional judgment and knowledge
to estimate market values on an annual basis. This may
mean looking at sales that take place outside the study time
frame or in a neighboring city or township.
7. Not all sales are representative of the market.
Some sales, such as foreclosures, sales between relatives, or
sales where the seller or buyer are acting under undue
duress are not considered open - market, arm's - length
transactions and are not used in sales ratio studies, nor are
they used as comparables in estimating the market values of
similar properties.
If you have additional questions or concerns, please contact
your county assessor.
This fact sheet is intended to help you become more familiar with Minnesota
tax laws and your rights and responsibilities under the laws. Nothing in this
fact sheet supersedes, alters, or otherwise changes any provisions of the tax
law, administrative rules, court decisions, or revenue notices. Alternative Cannata
available upon request.
Minnesota Revenue 1
MINNESOTA- REVENUE
www.taxes.state.mn.us
Tax Fact Sheet 12b
Property Tax Assessment Process
Minnesota has what is known as an ad valorem property tax.
This means property tax is divided among taxable properties
according to their value. The final amount of property tax
the owner of a property pays in any given year is the end
result of a process that begins over two years before property
tax statements are actually mailed to property owners.
The process begins with the assessor collecting data on sales
of properties within the market during a specific time period
between October of one year and September of the following
year (this period is known as a sales study period). Over the
next several months and by using mass appraisal techniques,
assessors analyze the data in order to estimate each
property's market value for the next assessment (January 2).
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 273.11 assessors
must estimate the value of property at a value that would
represent what the property would sell for in an open - market
arms length transaction on January 2 of each year. The
assessor cannot adopt a higher or lower standard of value
because the value will be used for the purposes of taxation.
Assessors also classify property according to its use on
January 2. Between April and June, taxpayer have an
opportunity to appeal both the estimated market value and
the classification of their property. Values and classifications
are generally finalized July 1 of each year.
Local units of government then finalize their estimated
budgets for the upcoming year. Once the budgets are
finalized in December, the market values and classifications
are used to divide the overall tax levy among all taxable
properties. Tax statements are mailed by the following
March 31.
For example, sales of properties that occur between October
1, 2008 and September 30, 2009 are used by assessors to
estimate a property's market value for the January 2, 2010
assessment. Following an appeal process that occurs between
April 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the valuations and
classifications generally become final on July 1, 2010.
Mail Station 3340 St. Paul, MN 55146 -3340
Revised 07/09
This lengthy time frame may result in a significant difference
between actual sales prices occurring in the current market
and assessors' estimated market values for the current year's
assessment.
Using the final values and the local jurisdictions' proposed
budgets, the auditor then estimates each property's proposed
taxes payable for 2011. After public budget meetings are
held and final budget numbers are adopted, property tax
statements are mailed to taxpayers by March 31, 2011.
In summary, sales taking place from October 2008 to
September 2009 are used to estimate a property's market
value as of January 2, 2010 which will in turn be used to
calculate property taxes payable in 2011.
What is the role of the assessor?
Assessors use historical sales in order to estimate each
property's market value as of the assessment date (January 2)
of each year. The assessor also classifies the property
according to its use on January 2 of each year.
Assessors also review other quantifiable data such as
supply /demand, marketing times, sales concessions, vacancy
rates, etc. to help in analyzing whether a market is increasing,
stable, or decreasing.
During increasing markets, this may benefit some property
owners because a buyer may pay a price that is significantly
higher than the assessor placed on the property for the last
assessment. For example, if a property is valued by the
assessor at $180,000 for the 2009 assessment (based on sales
that occurred between October 2007 and September 2008),
and it sells for $230,000 in August 2009, the new property
owner is benefiting from the lower market value for the 2009
assessment which will be used to calculate taxes payable in
2010.
The August 2009 sale of the property will be included in the
study period of October 2008 to September 2009 which the
This fact sheet is intended to help you become more familiar with Minnesota tax
laws and your rights and responsibilities under the laws. Nothing in this fact
sheet supersedes, alters, or otherwise changes any provisions of the tax law,
administrative rules, court decisions, or other revenue notices.
Alternative formats available upon request.
Minnesota Revenue, How the Assessor Estimates Your Market Value t
-934-
15
assessor will use to value property for the 2010 assessment
for taxes payable in 2011.
This same lag time is also present in declining markets. For
example, if the assessor places a market value of $200,000
on a property for the 2009 assessment (again using sales that
occurred between October 2007 and September 2008), but
the property sells for $175,000 in August 2009, does it mean
the January 2, 2009 assessed value is incorrect? Not
necessarily. It could signal a downturn in the housing
market just began to occur between September 2008 and
August 2009. The assessor will use the August 2009 sale as
well as other occurring in the market to estimate 2010
market values.
The assessor does not raise property tax revenues by
increasing values. Total property tax revenues are a function
of county, school district, and city/town spending as well as
state -paid local government aid and other factors. The value
and classification of the property are merely a way to divide
the total property tax levy among all taxpayers. The total
amount of the levy will be collected whether values increase
or decrease from one year to the next. An individual's share
of the overall tax burden may change from year to year,
however.
What are sales ratio studies?
Sales ratios show the relationship between the assessor's
estimated market value on a property and the actual sale
price of a property.
Each year the assessor performs sales ratio studies on
properties that have sold in their jurisdiction. These sales are
stratified many different ways including by location and
property type (residential, agricultural, commercial, etc.).
The sales can also be stratified further such as by home style,
subdivision, age of structure, location on or off water
frontage, price range, etc.
A single sale may not represent the true market activity.
Rather, sales of all properties are reviewed to determine
market trends. However, even if there are no sales occurring
within the sales ratio study period, assessors are still
expected to use their professional judgment and knowledge
of the local market to annually value properties in their
jurisdiction.
Whenever any real estate is sold for a consideration in excess
of $1,000, a Certificate of Real Estate Value (CRV) is filed.
These CRVs are the foundation of all sales ratio studies
because they contain important information about each
transaction. Assessors then verify the information contained
on the CRY in order to determine whether or not the sale
represents an open -market arm's length transaction. If the
sale does not represent an open - market, arm's length
transaction, it may not be used in the sales ratio study.
-935-
16
Simply having an extremely high or low sales ratio is not a
valid reason to remove a sale from the sales ratio study.
Rather, the extreme ratio indicates a need for additional
investigation by the assessor.
Again, sales ratio study periods are generally October I of a
given year to September 30 of the following year. For
example, for the 2010 assessment, assessors use sales that
took place between October 1, 2008 and September 30,
2009. This is the reason that assessors' market values may
lag a bit behind current market activity.
Assessors will use the median sales ratio as the statistical
measure of the overall level of assessment. The median ratio
is the middle ratio of all the ratios when they are arranged in
order from highest to lowest (or vice versa). The median is
used because it is not affected by extreme ratios. Department
of Revenue guidelines indicate that the median ratio of a
sales ratio study should be between 90 and 105 percent.
Is it possible for the values of some
properties to decrease while others
increase?
Yes. Each segment of the market is different. Sales prices of
certain types of properties can vary widely. Currently, sales
of both farmland and recreational properties are strong and
show appreciation. However, the sales of residential
properties are stable or declining in some areas.
Sometimes it can be difficult to estimate the rate at which a
market is increasing or declining. Ideally, a property would
sell twice within a certain period of time, such as one year,
but all other characteristics of the property would remain the
same. That way an appraiser or assessor would be able to
isolate a time adjustment to indicate whether the market is
increasing or decreasing or simply remaining stable.
Do all areas increase or decline at the same
rate?
No. Some areas or neighborhoods are declining at a much
faster rate than others that are showing stable values or
values that are slightly increasing.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is essential that taxpayers understand that
there may be a legitimate reason for the assessor's annual
market value to be different from current market conditions
due to the lag time between sales study periods and sales
taking place today.
For additional information, please refer to Fact Sheet 12a
Understanding Property Taxes and Fact Sheet 12c
Understanding Your Assessment and the Appeals Process.
Minnesota Revenue, How the Assessor Estimates Your Market Value 2
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Rousing Market
Median
Prices ® Around the
Metro
Id INkEA GOLIS AREA Association
REALTORS'
Change
Change
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
From 2012
From 2009
Twin Cities Region
$165,000
$1691900
$150,000
$167,900
$192,000
+14.4%
+ 16.4%
Afton
$307,000
$330,000
$430,000
$275,000
$409,500
+48.9%
+33.4%
Albertville
$167,190
$150,200
$142,500
$149,950
$178,900
+19.3%
+7.0%
Andover
$205,000
$205,000
$182,000
$205,000
$227,500
+11.0%
+11.0%
Annandale
$154,700
$154,110
$153,889
$170,000
$159,000
-6.5%
+2.8%
Anoka
$130,000
$136,312
$113,500
$122,900
$146,950
+19.6%
+13.0%
Apple Valley
$170,500
$177,150
$149,950
$175,000
$195,000
+11.4%
+14.4%
Arden Hills
$232,250
$241,025
$157,500
$325,000
$300,300
-7.6%
+29.3%
Bayport
$186,000
$157,500
$147,000
$184,500
$200,000
+8.4%
+7.5%
Becker
$134,500
$131,950
$131,700
$149,375
$155,900
+4.4%
+15.9%
Belle Plains
$149,900
$142,250
$137,300
$145,000
$159,000
+9.7%
+6.1%
Bethel
$140,000
$147,600
$100,000
$115,950
$135,000
+16.4%
-3.6%
Big Lake
$135,900
$140,000
$117,500
$134,900
$154,500
+14.5%
+13.7%
Birchwood Village
$299,000
$0
$240,500
$227,900
$287,375
+26.1%
-3.9%
Blaine
$169,900
$170,500
$154,900
$175,000
$199,500
+14.0%
+17.4%
Bloomington
$181,200
$178,322
$157,000
$171,000
$193,050
+12.900 %a
+6.5° %a
Bloomington - East
$157,250
$157,000
$140,000
$145,300
$169,350
+16.6%
+7.7%
Bloomington - West
$210,000
$206,950
$181,725
$191,000
$215,000
+12.6%
+2.4%
Brainerd MSA
$142,250
$151,000
$145,000
$154,000
$160,000
+3.9%
+12.5%
Brooklyn Center
$90,000
$110,000
$82,300
$95,000
$122,000
+28.4%
+35.6%
Brooklyn Park
$134,020
$140,000
$127,000
$146,000
$167,000
+14.4%
+24.6%
Buffalo
$145,500
$150,000
$131,500
$141,000
$171,810
+21.9%
+18.1%
Burnsville
$175,000
$167,000
$147,750
$165,300
$185,000
+11.9%
+5.7%
Cambridge
$110,125
$105,000
$94,000
$101,300
$127,000
+25.400 %o
+15.3%
Cannon Falls
$146,500
$139,450
$121,450
$145,000
$177,500
+22.4%
+21.2%
Carver
$237,950
$225,900
$225,000
$245,000
$282,500
+15.3%
+18.7%
Centerville
$222,000
$180,000
$154,600
$180,000
$189,950
+5.5%
-14.4%
Champlin
$162,000
$172,078
$148,000
$159,400
$182,700
+14.6%
+12.8%
Chanhassen
$267,500
$313,500
$297,500
$280,500
$303,500
+8.2%
+5.6° %o
Chaska
$177,500
$210,750
$170,000
$207,500
$252,000
+21.4%
+42.0%
Chisago
$175,000
$159,500
$155,700
$168,500
$199,850
+18.6%
+14.2%
Circle Pines
$148,750
$139,900
$124,150
$139,450
$144,300
+3.5%
-3.0%
Clear Lake
$113,000
$168,950
$146,800
$152,450
$162,700
+6.7%
+44.0%
Clearwater
$122,000
$159,900
$127,750
$150,000
$160,000
+6.7° %0
+31.1%
Coates
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
--
--
Cokato
$120,000
$99,000
$107,500
$105,000
$129,900
+23.7%
+8.3%
Cologne
$205,013
$193,000
$189,900
$182,550
$181,500
-0.6%
-11.5%
Columbia Heights
$122,500
$120,000
$101,500
$99,950
$132,000
+32.1%
+7.8° %a
Columbus
$222,000
$232,000
$177,277
$208,500
$202,800
-2.7%
-8.6%
Coon Rapids
$136,500
$133,000
$114,900
$125,105
$150,000
+19.9%
+9.9%
Corcoran
$315,000
$291,500
$246,000
$230,000
$300,000
+30.4%
-4.8%
Cottage Grove
$180,000
$174,450
$160,000
$174,650
$194,000
+11.1%
+7.8%
Crystal
$139,950
$139,900
$105,000
$127,550
$149,500
+17.2%
+6.8%
Dayton
$197,000
$205,000
$142,000
$191,500
$274,000
+43.1%
+39.1%
..... CurreyI ns o(..e tuvy 102014. Spu�6red bpRyal Credit Ul1irl (V4 V. RCU.org]. l,Ifdd, Irmn North =3a1 SPOmered t. ICKR earch,,d Markwr, 117
936-
17
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Median Prices - Around the Metro
W
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
ctREAI.1 -0RS'
-937-
18
Change
Change
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Fmm 2012
From 2009
Deephaven
$545,000
$509,000
$322,000
$493,250
$5181500
+6.1%
-4.9%
Delano
$201,500
$195,000
$173,150
$205,500
$230,000
+11.9%
+14.1%
Dellwood
$462,500
$617,575
$499,000
$360,000
$507,500
+41.0%
+9.7%
Eagan
$182,150
$189,000
$170,950
$193,990
$220,000
+13.4%
+20.8%
East Bethel
$158,950
$150,400
$162,500
$165,000
$179,900
+9.0%
+13.2%
Eden Prairie
$250,000
$264,800
$257,110
$257,000
$280,000
+8.9%
+120%
Edina
$324,900
$339,000
$339,000
$343,875
$350,000
+1.8%
+7.7%
Elk River
$158,000
$160,000
$132,000
$157,000
$171,500
+9.2%
+8.5%
Elko New Market
$2301000
$209,900
$193,000
$215,000
$247,627
+15.2%
+7.7%
Excelsior
$332,450
$277,000
$350,000
$291,500
$409,750
+40.6%
+23.3%
Falcon Heights
$267,500
$239,500
$207500
$228,706
$244,000
+6.7%
-8.8%
Faribault
$115,500
$118,500
$100,000
$115,000
$128,450
+11.7%
+11.2%
Farmington
$175,600
$172,000
$140,500
$163,000
$192,250
+17.9%
+9.5%
Forest Lake
$142,000
$135,450
$153,750
$185,000
$191,000
+3.2%
+34.5%
Fridley
$138,900
$136,545
$120,000
$127,000
$153,500
+20.994,
+10.5%
Gem Lake
$302,500
$225,450
$240,000
$352,261
$169,450
-51.9%
-44.0%
Golden Valley
$220,000
$235,500
$199,000
$218,500
$246,000
+12.6%
+11.8%
Grant
$432,500
$395,000
$422,500
$367,500
$415,500
+13.1%
-3.9%
Greenfield
$153,250
$237,750
$373,000
$350,000
$354,000
+1.1%
+131.0%
Greenwood
$796,750
$659,900
$755,000
$675,000
$921,500
+36.5%
+15.7%
Ham Lake
$235,500
$227,500
$211,500
$230,000
$271,600
+ 18A%
+15.3%
Hamburg
$124,900
$102,450
$75,200
$111,500
$95,500
- 14.3%
-23.6%
Hammond
$127,500
$116,500
$115,750
$121,450
$144,000
+18.6%
+12.9%
Hampton
$173,875
$189,950
$172,000
$138,500
$217,250
+56.9%
+24.9%
Hanover
$229,900
$208,875
$214,950
$211,000
$239,950
+13.7%
+4.4%
Hastings
$150,000
$148,500
$128,500
$142,000
$169,900
+19.6%
+13.3%
Hilltop
$120,000
$35,000
$0
$24,500
$34,500
+40.800 %a
-71.3%
Hopkins
$160,000
$148,000
$125,000
$159,950
$180,500
+12.8%
+12.8%
Hudson
$195,000
$194,848
$184,500
$195,000
$228,500
+172%
+17.2%
Hugo
$154,900
$158,338
$137,000
$164,199
$195,000
+18.8%
+25.9%
Hutchinson
$124,950
$127,950
$115,000
$111,500
$125,000
+12.1%
+0.0%
Independence
$306,500
$433,500
$247,950
$387,250
$405,000
+4.6%
+32.1%
Inver Grove Heights
$165,751
$165,500
$155,000
$160,000
$194,950
+21.8%
+17.6%
Isanti
$120,950
$114,114
$91,500
$117,000
$125,000
+6.8%
+3.3%
Jordan
$204,000
$174,150
$178,000
$177,000
$214,500
+21.2%
+5.1%
Lake Elmo
$405,250
$369,500
$374,800
$367,500
$374,900
+2.0%
-7.5%
Lake Minnetonka Area
$337,900
$341,250
$329,860
$339,000
$370,000
+9.1%
+9.5%
Lake St. Croix Beach
$158,000
$154,850
$85,250
$180,000
$139,000
-22.8%
- 12.0%
Lakeland
$169,000
$211,000
$221,000
$195,500
$204,990
+4.9%
+21.3%
Lakeland Shores
$270,000
$738,100
$178,139
$270,000
$265,000
-1.9%
-1.9%
Lakeville
$224,188
$225,000
$205,000
$226,000
$258,000
+14.2%
+15.1%
Lauderdale
$189,950
$173,900
$128,150
$168,000
$175,000
+42%
-7.9%
Lexington
$138,250
$130,000
$108,563
$136,950
$149,900
+9.5%
+8.4° %a
Lilydale
$180000
$201,500
$177,500
$190,000
$200,250
+5.4%
+11.3%
Cwmn! s, of Jenaa�-10, 20t4 . Sponsored by Rye[ Cr,dlt Unlan (
wu ROU ol," r.11 dA,
from Norh,141:
S. lo,svi d b, IOK
Rs,co ch and
l IS
-937-
18
2013 Annual Report on
the Twin Cities Housing Market
Median Prices ® Around the Metro
MINNWOLIS
AREA Hssocnimn
�fREALTORS'
Change
Change
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
From 2012
from 2009
Lindstrom
$180,000
$150,000
$143,900
$140,000
$160,025
+14.3%
-11.1%
Lino Lakes
$218,950
$211,250
$174,200
$208,375
$229,900
+10.3%
+5.0%
Little Canada
$175,250
$106,500
$140,000
$175,000
$184,250
+5.3%
+5.1%
Long Lake
$197,450
$198,500
$186,500
$227,500
$231,500
+1.8%
+1Z2%
Lonsdale
$160,750
$150,000
$135,000
$144,900
$171,000
+18.0%
+6.4%
Loretto
$190,800
$215,572
$217,875
$130,000
$199,900
+53.8%
+4.8%
Mahtomedi
$199,000
$249,995
$257,500
$249,900
$245,000
-2.0%
+23.1%
Maple Grove
$222,000
$258,000
$214,000
$219,453
$232,750
+6.1%
+4.8%
Maple Lake
$100,000
$100,000
$112,840
$134,950
$145,000
+7.4%
+45.0%
Maple Plain
$161,250
$166,700
$153,500
$187,450
$178,750
-4.6%
+10.9%
Maplewood
$162,000
$156,000
$139,400
$145,000
$165,000
+13.8%
+1.9%
Marine on St. Croix
$283,500
$272,500
$242,000
$274,450
$320,000
+16.6%
+12.9%
Mayer
$169,900
$174,950
$169,900
$164,405
$189,900
+15.5%
+11.8%
Medicine Lake
$0
$600,000
$315,000
$650,000
$542,000
-16.6%
--
Medina
$580,000
$615,000
$525,000
$460,000
$527,500
+14.7°%a
-9.1%
Mendota
$0
$493,500
$80,000
$154,500
$287,000
+85.8%
--
Mendota Heights
$289,450
$305,000
$286,500
$272,000
$282,500
+3.9%
-2.4%
Miesville
$0
$165,350
$0
$140,000
$231,671
+65.5%
- -
Minneapolis - (Citywide)
$145,000
$160,000
$140,000
$165,000
$189,075
+14.6%
+30.4%
Minneapolis - Calhoun -Isle
$272,750
$315,000
$267,021
$300,000
$327,780
+9.3%
+20.2%
Minneapolis - Camden
$49,000
$66,002
$45,000
$59,500
$77,000
+29.4%
+57.1%
Minneapolis - Central
$237,500
$225,000
$214,250
$220,000
$247,500
+12.5%
+4.2%
Minneapolis - Longfellow
$172,000
$170,500
$147,500
$169,000
$185,200
+9.6%
+7.7%
Minneapolis - Near North
$36,950
$55,000
$43,000
$60,000
$81,000
+35.0%
+119.2%
Minneapolis - Nokomis
$189,892
$195,200
$162,700
$176,500
$199,900
+13.3%
+5.3%
Minneapolis - Northeast
$150,000
$151,500
$125,000
$140,000
$169,900
+21.4%
+13.3%
Minneapolis - Phillips
$78,000
$110,000
$72,500
$88,000
$90,225
+2.5%
+15.7%
Minneapolis - Powderhorn
$123,950
$135,000
$110,000
$116,400
$157,500
+35.3%
+27.1%
Minneapolis - Southwest
$260,000
$276,000
$264,450
$277,000
$306,000
+10.5%
+ 17.7 %
Minneapolis - University
$215,000
$207,950
$205,250
$209,950
$221,500
+5.5%
+3.0%
Minnetonka
$245,000
$265,713
$233,000
$255,000
$278,950
+9.4%
+13.9%
Minnetonka Beach
$2,700,000
$825,000
$1,130,000
$675,000
$892,500
+32.2%
-66.9%
Minnetrista
$346,639
$325,086
$349,950
$385,000
$435,000
+13.0%
+25.5%
Monticello
$133,000
$135,000
$124,000
$137,095
$155,990
+13.8%
+17.3%
Montrose
$133,943
$131,371
$114,950
$130,357
$149,000
+14.3%
+11.2%
More
$87,700
$79,900
$84,400
$86,500
$98,000
+13.3%
+11.7%
Mound
$181,000
$188,000
$150,000
$169,000
$192,750
+14.1%
+6.5%
Mounds View
$153,000
$166,700
$134,950
$139,500
$163,000
+16.8%
+6.5%
New Brighton
$187,000
$178,000
$157,500
$165,000
$171,000
+3.6%
-8.6%
New Germany
$109,000
$105,000
$110,000
$100,000
$142,450
+42.5%
+30.7%
New Hope
$158,250
$148,000
$126,125
$155,000
$173,000
+11.6%
+9.3%
New Prague
$170,000
$161,250
$143,000
$174,000
$195,000
+12.1%
+14.7%
New Richmond
$139,950
$135,400
$110,000
$124,900
$137,850
+10.4%
-1.5%
New Trier
$0
$149,900
$0
$75,000
$63,700
-15.1%
--
...... Correo�asoNrrwry
10, 2014. Sp reo!etl byR
ICretle Union( aRCUnr9).,r��;tlatzfrom
NotlM1St4F £Saovieretlby
iCKR
eamb zntl Marketing. 19
-938-
19
2013 Annual Report on the Twin Cities Housing Market
Median Prices ® Around the Metro
4VINNEAPOUS AREA Association
orREAILTORS'
Curter es f'enuary 1e. 2014_ Sponsored byk cJ OreCI Unrn(, `,Ri U.org ) e.edeta f.0rrrNOIhsWNIL5. POwcred by I0K Researchand 1,, ,,r, 120
-939-
20
Change
Change
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
From 2012
From 2009
Newport
$127,400
$123,500
$72,175
$98,500
$141,000
+43.1%
+10.7%
North Branch
$144,350
$136,000
$115,000
$123,650
$150,000
+21.3%
+3.9%
North Oaks
$475,000
$584,000
$480,000
$510,000
$625,000
+22.5 %%
+31.6%
North Saint Paul
$160,000
$145,000
$120,D00
$139,950
$151,000
+7.9%
-5.6%
Northfield
$165,000
$159,900
$144,550
$157,250
$182,500
+16.1%
+10.6%
Norwood Young America
$134,500
$155,450
$119,900
$128,912
$146,000
+13.3%
+8.6%
Nowthen
$230,090
$216,000
$180,000
$209,500
$234,500
+11.9%
+2.0%
Oak Grove
$207,000
$200,450
$175,000
$200,825
$229,000
+ 14.0%
+10+6%
Oak Park Heights
$127,000
$136,100
$130,000
$134,799
$176,200
+30.7%
+38.7%
Oakdale
$159,900
$164,600
$133,000
$134,950
$164,000
+21.5%
+2.6%
Orono
$595,000
$565,000
$532,500
$377,223
$501,000
+32.89A
-15.8%
Osseo
$146,250
$136,000
$115,000
$153,950
$141,950
-7.8%
-2.9%
Otsego
$159,900
$160,610
$159,900
$163,450
$194,150
+18.8%
+21.4%
Pine City
$122,500
$100,000
$81,500
$105,260
$111,275
+5.7%
-9.2%
Pine Springs
$485,000
$390,000
$300,000
$271,500
$320,000
+17.9%
-34.0%
Plymouth
$253,500
$249,000
$245,000
$275,500
$301,500
+9.4%
+18.9%
Princeton
$103,160
$113,900
$111,000
$105,000
$140,000
+33.3%
+35.7%
Prior Lake
$234,500
$223,900
$211,000
$227,500
$270,10D
+ 18.7%
+ 15.20%
Ramsey
$152,250
$156,830
$137,000
$153,000
$182,900
+19.5%
+20.1%
Randolph
$169,400
$198,900
$168,937
$139,950
$195,900
+40.0%
+15.6%
Red Wing
$139,900
$125,000
$119,850
$127,500
$126,900
-0.5%
-9.3%
Richfield
$165,000
$160,000
$140,250
$155,000
$174,900
+12.8%
+6.0%
River Falls
$165,000
$172,500
$143,600
$151,000
$168,500
+11.6%
+2.1%
Robbinsdale
$145,000
$131,500
$104,750
$123,500
$140,000
+13.4%
-3.4%
Rockford
$192,500
$169,800
$130,000
$154,000
$197,400
+28.2%
+2.5%
Rogers
$226,825
$212,000
$210,000
$236,000
$265,000
+12.3%
+16.8%
Rosemount
$193,500
$201,500
$170,0DO
$180,000
$215,000
+19.4%
+11.1%
Roseville
$198,000
$190,000
$158,500
$187,450
$197,535
+5.4%
-0.2%
Rush City
$87,000
$95,000
$113,000
$92,000
$122,750
+33.4%
+41.1%
Saint Anthony
$210,000
$181,000
$178,200
$154,950
$179,950
+16.1%
-14.3%
Saint Bonifacius
$170,000
$178,850
$145,000
$189,500
$185,500
-2.1%
+9.1%
Saint Cloud MSA
$135,200
$135,000
$127,000
$135,000
$144,500
+7.0%
+6.9%
Saint Francis
$133,000
$135,000
$122,100
$130,000
$149,450
+15.0%
+12.4%
Saint Louis Park
$212,500
$213,250
$185,000
$198,450
$219,000
+10.4%
+3.1 %
Saint Mary's Point
$235,000
$134,500
$1,100,000
$170,500
$258,800
+51.8%
+10.10%
Saint Michael
$179,950
$165,000
$165,000
$183,363
$199,450
+8.8%
+10.8%
Saint Paul
$117,500
$121,250
$100,000
$120,000
$144,000
+20.0%
+22.6%
Saint Paul - Battle Creek /Highwood
$116,000
$121,500
$89,700
$111,950
$135,050
+20.6%
+16.4%
Saint Paul - Como Park
$199,900
$190,400
$145,000
$170,ODO
$190,000
+11.8%
-5.0%
Saint Paul - Dayton's Bluff
$60,000
$74,950
$50,000
$59,450
$92,900
+56.3%
+54.8%
Saint Paul - Downtown
$140,000
$152,500
$128,250
$136,500
$157,975
+ 15.7%
+12.8%
Saint Paul- Greater East Side
$103,000
$102,000
$85,000
$88,900
$115,750
+30.2 %%
+12.4%
Saint Paul - Hamline- Midway
$149,450
$142,000
$104,500
$126,350
$149,125
+18.0%
-0.2%
Saint Paul - Highland Park
$225,000
$232,250
$235,000
$229,900
$249,500
+8.5%
+10.9%
Curter es f'enuary 1e. 2014_ Sponsored byk cJ OreCI Unrn(, `,Ri U.org ) e.edeta f.0rrrNOIhsWNIL5. POwcred by I0K Researchand 1,, ,,r, 120
-939-
20
2013 Annual Report on the Twin
Cities Housing Market
Median Prices 6 Around the
Metro
MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association
of REALIORS'
Change
Change
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
From 2012
From 2009
Saint Paul - Lexington- Hamline
$214,900
$217,000
$210,000
$240,000
$229,900
- 4.2%
+7.0%
Saint Paul - Macalester- Groveland
$240,000
$250,000
$228,750
$235,000
$264,250
+ 12.4%
+10.1%
Saint Paul - North End / South Como
$75,000
$76,250
$57,313
$74,050
$99,900
+ 34.9%
+33,2%
Saint Paul - Payne - Phalen
$70,000
$82,000
$65,000
$80,500
$101,000
+25.5%
+44.3%
Saint Paul - St. Anthony Park
$258,000
$216,750
$180,000
$190,000
$259,500
+36.6%
+0.6%
Saint Paul - Summit Hill
$315,000
$377,500
$325,000
$288,000
$341,450
+18.6%
+8.4%
Saint Paul - Summit - University
$125,000
$157,325
$130,000
$148,750
$170,000
+14.3%
+36.0%
Saint Paul - Thomas -Dale
$49,500
$65,450
$45,000
$55,000
$80,950
+47.2%
+63.5%
Saint Paul - West Seventh
$148,450
$142,900
$103,626
$121,000
$145,D00
+19.8%
-2.3%
Saint Paul - West Side
$91,000
$113,000
$82,000
$90,000
$122,000
+35.6%
+34.1%
Saint Paul Park
$129,900
$134,600
$117,000
$127,750
$145,200
+13.7%
+11.8%
Savage
$210,000
$200,000
$186,500
$208,000
$235,000
+13.0%
+11.9%
Scandia
$255,000
$235,000
$240,000
$247,870
$290,000
+17.0%
+13.7%
Shakopee
$175,000
$180,000
$154,900
$167,000
$193,000
+15.6%
+10.3%
Shoreview
$204,950
$205,000
$180,000
$191,000
$222,500
+16.5%
+8.6%
Shorewood
$356,200
$359,288
$349,950
$414,900
$425,000
+2.4%
+19.3%
Somerset
$136,400
$130,950
$127,000
$119,900
$144,500
+20.5%
+5.9%
South Haven
$160,000
$215,500
$187,500
$153,500
$184,950
+20.5%
+15.6%
South Saint Paul
$130,250
$131,500
$114,995
$112,000
$139,900
+24.9%
+7.4%
Spring Lake Park
$136,500
$131,000
$92,250
$118,D00
$141,000
+19.5%
+3.3%
Spring Park
$270,000
$266,500
$199,900
$352,500
$272,500
- 22.7%
+0.9%
Stacy
$153,450
$138,500
$139,000
$108,750
$181,750
+67.1%
+18.4%
Stillwater
$208,500
$230,000
$208,000
$216,000
$234,000
+8.3%
+12.2%
Sunfish Lake
$830,000
$300,000
$550,320
$685,000
$819,000
+19.6%
-1.3%
Tonka Bay
$525,OD0
$495,000
$550,000
$797,500
$477,500
- 401%
-9.0%
Vadnais Heights
$153,500
$165,000
$165,000
$149,900
$167,250
+11.6%
+9.0%
Vermillion
$169,900
$145,013
$153,500
$187,500
$157,500
-16,0%
-7.3%
Victoria
$330,375
$374,695
$351,250
$344,123
$371,500
+8.0%
+12.4%
Waconia
$199,700
$213,500
$187,500
$204,250
$228,500
+11.9%
+14A%
Watertown
$175,263
$159,500
$118,000
$153,000
$175,000
+14.4%
-0.2%
Wayzata
$500,000
$439,000
$426,000
$427,500
$348,000
-18.6%
-30.4%
West Saint Paul
$126,500
$136,500
$120,000
$125,700
$142,750
+13.6%
+12.8%
White Bear Lake
$167,000
$175,000
$148,500
$161,950
$178,50D
+10.2%
+6.9%
Willemie
$70,000
$117,699
$77,000
$141,500
$128,900
-8.9%
+84.1%
Woodbury
$239,000
$243,750
$219,700
$240,000
$267,000
+113%
+11.7%
Woodland
$847,500
$561,000
$1,065,000
$700,000
$370,000
-47.1%
- 56.3 %%
Wyoming
$165,000
$156,700
$150,000
$163,750
$190,000
+16.0%
+15.2%
Zimmerman
$135,000
$143,700
$118,000
$130,000
$151,250
+16.3%
+12.0%
Zumbrota
$154,000
$129,700
$132,950
$149,900
$155,000
+3.4%
+0.6%
-.- Current as ; f January 10, £014. Sponsored be RogW Credit Union (aww.RCU g), Ali data from NorlhsterM:S ao+ered by 10K turreirch trial Marketing. i 21
-940-
21
Executive Summary
TO: Mound City Council and Staff
FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner
DATE: May 8, 2014
SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 14 -01 Concept/Sketch Plan — Major Subdivision
REQUEST SUMMARY
The applicant, Kent Fredrichsen, is proposing a 3 lot major subdivision in the vicinity of Meadow
Lane, Fairfield Road, and Leach Lane (unimproved). The applicant has requested City Council
review of the concept/sketch plan to identify any potential issues prior to the development of the
formal application. Review by the City Council of a concept/sketch plan for a major subdivision is
provided for in the subdivision regulations. The proposed major subdivision will be an infill
project made possible through the applicant's assembly of former tax forfeited properties near
his home, as well as the vacation of certain portions of unimproved Hullett Avenue through City
Council approval last fall. The project is a major subdivision as it involves the extension of
Fairfield Road to the west, the construction of Leach Lane with a cul -de -sac, and the extension
of public utilities to serve the three lots.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their May 6, 2014 meeting. A neighbor attended
the meeting and expressed concern about the subdivision. The extension of Fairfield Road will
occur in front of his house while Leach Lane will be extended to the west of his home. He also
expressed concern about the potential impacts on the wetlands in the area. The Planning
Commission expressed minimal concerns about the proposed subdivision. It was requested that
the setback areas be shown when the formal application is made. The draft minutes from the
meeting have been provided for review.
1231 941 'hird Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612)338-0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
MINUTE EXCERPTS
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 6, 2014
Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin
Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist & Pete
Wiechert. Staff present: Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secr'etaryJill Norlander.
Others present: Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd); Art &
Barb King (2964 Pelican Point Cir); Loren Pellet (5660 Sunnybrook Cir); Matt Van Nelson (2925
Meadow La); Grant Johnson (6347 Bay Ridge Rd)
BOARD OF APPEALS
Planning Case No. 14 -01 Sketch Plan for Major Subdivision
Meadow Lane /Fairfield Road/ Leach Lane - Applicant: Kent Friedrichsen
Trapp introduced the sketch plan. Proposed is a three lot subdivision that meets the
comprehensive plan designation and is zoned R2 residential. The major subdivision process is
required because of construction of streets and utilities to serve the proposed lots. There are
no flood plain issues. Wetlands are located northwest of the parcel. The parcel currently has
no improved streets for access; however, a 24 foot wide street constructed with a cul -de -sac
and the extension of Fairfield Road with a turnaround as required by fire code is contemplated.
There are some engineering design issues'`(stormwater and water main) to be addressed with
the Public Works Department.
Zoning standards for R2 are being met with the exception of the lot depth for Lot 3. Staff is
generally supportive of the variance as it is needed due to a desire not to extend Fairfield Road
farther west in front of the lot. This results in the lot not having enough frontage on Fairfield
Road to meet minimum requirements for lot frontage on an improved public street and the
designation of the front of the lot needing to be Leach Lane. Due to the 24 foot street width
there will be no parking on either side of the street. Placement of houses on the survey has
been shown to demonstrate that houses can be built on the proposed lots. Some private
utilities may need to be moved and are being addressed.
Retterath asked if the staff is comfortable with the 24 foot street width. Trapp said public
works and engineering said it was doable. He questioned the Fairfield turnaround vs. a full size
cul -de -sac. Trapp said that the turnaround fulfilled the fire requirements but would be "no
parking ". City Engineer said that, at this point, storm water is ok and will be handled in detail.
Retterath requested setback lines be shown in future sketches.
-942-
Smieja asked if parking would be allowed in the cul -de -sac. Trapp said no.
Retterath questioned how the hardcover percentage was established. Trapp noted that
hardcover percentages are not linked to zoning but rather to whether a lot is a lot of record or a
new lot.
Discussion
Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd) asked if there is a time when someone has a chance to
oppose the plan. Penner indicated there would be a public hearing and neighbors would be
notified.
-943-
r
MIN
CITY 4F CAOUND _..
min
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
DATE: April 30, 2014
SUBJECT: Concept /sketch plan —major subdivision
APPLICANT: Kent Friedrichsen
PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 14 -01
ZONING: R- 2 Single and Two Family Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential
SUMMARY
The applicant, Kent Fredrichsen, is proposing a 3 lot subdivision involving a number of
parcels in the vicinity of Meadow Lane, Fairfield Road and Leach Lane (unimproved) and
is requesting concept /sketch plan review by the Planning Commission.
PROCESS
Whenever a subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner, or authorized agent,
shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance with the
procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 121. The submittal of a sketch plan is the first
step in the major subdivision process. It involves an informal review by Staff to outline
various planning - related issues associated with a pending project and the identification
of items that will need to be addressed in subsequent submittals. Review by the
Planning Commission and City Council is optional and not required by the City Code but
is recommended and encouraged for larger projects. To assist in the discussion, the
Planning Report will address aspects of the subdivision process. Staff notes that the
following comments are offered for general discussion purposes and that additional
items may be identified during the formal review of subsequent application materials
submitted.
...
BACKGROUND AND SITE INFORMATION
In November 2013, the Council approved the request from Mr. Fredrichsen for vacation
of certain portions of unimproved Hullett Avenue that abut PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086
and PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079 which he owns and were former tax forfeit parcels. in
August 2013, he purchased PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080 which is located immediately
north of PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079. Mr. Friedrichsen also owns the property at 5913
Fairfield Road which is located immediately east of PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086. As part
of the requested street vacation, the applicant prepared a preliminary layout, to
demonstrate what a possible subdivision in the area could look like if the affected
streets were vacated.
The subject property is generally wooded and is currently vacant / unimproved. At
present, the subject area lacks frontage on an improved street as the improved portion
of Fairfield Road ends in the vicinity of Meadow Lane. It is surrounded by residential
uses including a home located at 5921 Fairfield Road which would be located
immediately east of the proposed new road to be constructed in the previously platted
Leach Lane ROW. As stated above, the applicant owns the property at 5918 Fairfield
Road which is located east of proposed Lot 1. There are also new homes in the
neighborhood that were recently constructed as part of the former Anderson
subdivision and on Meadow Lane. As part of the proposed development, Fairfield Road
would be extended to the west to include a turnaround and a 24 -foot road would be
constructed within the right of way of Leach Lane along with a cul -de -sac (22 foot
radius) to provide access to the proposed 3 new lots. For details regarding the proposed
subdivision, please refer to the submitted application materials and project narratives
that were provided by the applicant.
LAND USE
Comprehensive Plan. The City's current Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Low
Density Residential, which allows for single - family detached and attached housing types
within the density range of 1 to 6 units per acre. Density is computed area wide as
opposed to an individual site. The proposed subdivision meets the Comprehensive Plan
guidance.
-945-
Zoning. The subject property is located in the R -2 (Single and Two Family Residential)
zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of the City Code.
The applicable standards of the R -2 District per Sec. 129 -100 of the City Code are as
follows:
The applicant provided preliminary information related to the proposed new lots on the
concept /sketch plan (Sheet 1 of 2) for review and discussion.
Subdivision. The proposed lot arrangement will be processed as a major subdivision as
described in Sec. 121 -35 of the City Code as the proposed subdivision requires the
construction of public facilities and improvements. Staff also notes that variances or
other required approvals (i.e. conditional use permit, etc.) could be needed depending
upon the final design submitted and its conformity with Sec. 121 (subdivision) and 129
(zoning) of the City Code.
Floodplain . Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.3
(Floodplain) in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be floodplain on
the subject property. Per code, all new structures must meet or exceed the Regulatory
Flood Protection Elevation or be three feet above the OHWM of wetland, as applicable.
Wetlands. Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.4 (Wetlands)
from the 2030 Mound Comprehensive Plan, there are wetlands in the vicinity of the
subject area, however they appear to be offsite. The need for a wetland
evaluation /report will determined in cooperation with Staff /Consultants as part of any
future submittal. Applicant is advised that the City of Mound is the Regulatory
Governmental Unit (RGU) for application of the Wetland Conservation Act (LGU) related
to a boundary determination. All other wetland permitting is the responsibility of the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD.)
6,000 sq. ft.
lot Area
Lot Frontage
40 ft.
Lot Width
40 ft.
Lot Depth
80 ft.
Front Yard Setback
20 ft.
Side Yard Setback
10 ft.
Rear Yard Setback
15 ft
Imperviousness
30
The applicant provided preliminary information related to the proposed new lots on the
concept /sketch plan (Sheet 1 of 2) for review and discussion.
Subdivision. The proposed lot arrangement will be processed as a major subdivision as
described in Sec. 121 -35 of the City Code as the proposed subdivision requires the
construction of public facilities and improvements. Staff also notes that variances or
other required approvals (i.e. conditional use permit, etc.) could be needed depending
upon the final design submitted and its conformity with Sec. 121 (subdivision) and 129
(zoning) of the City Code.
Floodplain . Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.3
(Floodplain) in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be floodplain on
the subject property. Per code, all new structures must meet or exceed the Regulatory
Flood Protection Elevation or be three feet above the OHWM of wetland, as applicable.
Wetlands. Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.4 (Wetlands)
from the 2030 Mound Comprehensive Plan, there are wetlands in the vicinity of the
subject area, however they appear to be offsite. The need for a wetland
evaluation /report will determined in cooperation with Staff /Consultants as part of any
future submittal. Applicant is advised that the City of Mound is the Regulatory
Governmental Unit (RGU) for application of the Wetland Conservation Act (LGU) related
to a boundary determination. All other wetland permitting is the responsibility of the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD.)
INFRASTRUCTURE
Storm Water. Stormwater permitting is under the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District (MCWD) following regulatory authority turn back to the District by
the Mound City Council which took place in August, 2011.
streets / Grading / Utilities. Currently there is not an improved street that can provide
access to the proposed lots. Thus, the proposal includes construction of a 24- foot road
with a cul -de -sac in the unimproved portion of Leach Lane, as well as a "turnaround" for
vehicles in the unimproved portion of Fairfield Road. Preliminary grading and utilities
were shown on the submitted concept /sketch plan.
Park Land Dedication. Dedication of park land and /or payment of fees in lieu of land
dedication is required by Sec. 121 -121 of the City Code. If a future subdivision is
approved, Staff recommends the submittal of a cash payment in lieu of park dedication.
For major subdivisions, the approved 2014 fee is 10 percent of the current land value
per Hennepin County Tax Information. Payment of park dedication will be collected
prior to release of the resolution.
MCES Sewer Area Charge (SAC). The 2014 MCES fee for a SAC unit is $2,485.00. MCES
charges will be collected at the time of building permit issuance at the rate in effect at
that time.
City Water /Sewer Trunk Charges and Connections Fees. The 2014 trunk water fee is
$2,000.00 per lot and the 2014 trunk sewer charge is $2,000.00 per lot. Payment of
trunk water and trunk charges will be required prior to release of the resolution unless
Council approves an alternate schedule. The 2014 sewer connection fee is $240.00 per
lot and the 2014 water connection fee is $240.00 per lot. Payment of sewer connection
and water connection fees for each lot will be collected at the time of building permit
issuance.
CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Copies of the concept /sketch plan application and supporting materials were forwarded
to involved departments, consultants and agencies for review and comment.
Comments received are summarized below:
City Attorney Melissa Manderschied. I reviewed the plans and my only
comment is that there will need to be a variance for the Lot 3 depth setback.
Some of those 30% cover measurements are very tight. I'll defer to the Fire
Department on the road and related matters as I recall those had to do with Fire
Department truck turning radius.
.,
Building Official Scott Qualle. No comments.
City Engineer Dan Faulkner. Probe Engineering has done a good job in
responding to the items we discussed at the February 26th meeting. The
following are my comments that are more design related versus concept layout:
- the watermain is now shown as a looped system; the Dept of
Health requires a 10 -foot separation from sanitary sewer lines
which will be difficult to construct given the 24 -foot wide roadway
and the existing lot 4 (5921 Fairfield) and deck and no easement;
this may require some re- design to relocate the proposed sanitary
and watermain lines.
there are no off -site contours shown where storm drainage will be
going off -site via the proposed spillway; may need some type of
stilling pond or attenuation.
if there's a high point in the proposed watermain line, other than
at the hydrant, some type of air release valve will be necessary.
DISCUSSION
1. Staff, including representatives from the Public Works and Fire Department, met
with the applicant and his engineer on February 26, 2014 to discuss an earlier
version of the concept /sketch plan and supporting information that had been
deemed incomplete. Following the meeting, a revised concept /sketch plan was
received on March 25, 2014 to respond to comments from the meeting primarily
related to a revised road design and turnaround areas; also to provide some
preliminary topography.
2. Applicant is advised that the code requires public hearings by held by both the
Planning Commission and the City Council for major subdivisions applications.
3. Applicant has been in contact with the private utility companies related to the
proposed subdivision. Copies of the concept /sketch plan application materials
were also forwarded by the City as part of the routing process.
3. The project involves the construction of new infrastructure including but not
limited to, street improvements and utilities. All costs associated with these
activities are the responsibility of the applicant /subdivider.
5. As part of a future subdivision application, written consent by any lien holder(s)
may be required and would determined in cooperation with the City Attorney.
Additionally, bank or lien holder(s) consent would also likely be required for the
dedication of public drainage and utility easements.
6. Evaluation of the proposed lots' conformity with the R -2 standards and
discussion with the applicant is requested related to the lot frontage and lot
depth requirements because of the proposed road improvements and cul-
de -sac to be constructed. See below excerpts from City Code:
Sec. 129 -100 states as follows: "Minimum lotfrontage on an improved
public street shall be 40 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul -de -sac
shall be 40 feet at the front building setback line."
Per Sec. 129 -2, lot depth is defined as follows:
Lot depth means the mean horizontal distance between the
front lot line and the rear lot line of a lot.
Per Sec. 129 -2, lot line (front) is defined as follows:
Lot line, front, means that boundary of a lot which abuts an
existing or dedicated public street. In the case of a corner lot it
shall be the shortest dimension on a public street or as otherwise
designated by the Community Development Director based on the
practical front yard of the property as determined by such factors
as the existing or proposed building configuration of the property
and taking into consideration the characteristics of the
surrounding properties. If the dimensions of a corner lot are equal,
the front line shall be designated by the owner and filed with the
city. For purpose of this chapter, a lot shall have only one front
setback.
7. Parking on both sides of the proposed new street and turnaround will be
prohibited.
Mel
W
U)
Lj-
W
Q
U
H
WiU
�7
by
m
0
m
1 .W
'
3.90,5£
3
Q'p
z
p
J
W �
��,�3
1734 1
� Z
�9NI151%3
p MM
J
oa'os
°
3 „90,92. IOS
E
�
M
%
Pw
L13I)IO
J
62
� u . cJ Fp -
O
_
-
-
—
MAO?JWINn 1 a31VOVn
3nN3nV NOV3 nN3AV UOV91
3 905205
00'
_ 3 „O,94(OON
96i9LI
(
IL Z - or
3 „OZ,Sb.00N 3nN3nV
g a $
jg"E i
P'P'-!; Olt
g 3y!s °� wpm$ -m
PH mi
;,sqa= � <R6 wz E wdEE
O @`o S'E9 jstl
.�Tga zzE PHI $5�
z pg -z-3
_5= OBE ° - NaE
H we mV c s£m� Fed
rco >.
<9�0 m`� mdm
Q m_
`oE
V
w
z �w
0
U ¢p
w of
o
o ¢�
a a�
m
0
m
I
Q'p
z
ptoOC
J
W �
��,�3
1734 1
� Z
�9NI151%3
J
62
� u . cJ Fp -
O
_
-
-
—
MAO?JWINn 1 a31VOVn
3nN3nV NOV3 nN3AV UOV91
3 905205
00'
_ 3 „O,94(OON
96i9LI
(
IL Z - or
3 „OZ,Sb.00N 3nN3nV
g a $
jg"E i
P'P'-!; Olt
g 3y!s °� wpm$ -m
PH mi
;,sqa= � <R6 wz E wdEE
O @`o S'E9 jstl
.�Tga zzE PHI $5�
z pg -z-3
_5= OBE ° - NaE
H we mV c s£m� Fed
rco >.
<9�0 m`� mdm
Q m_
`oE
V
w
z �w
0
U ¢p
w of
o
o ¢�
a a�
`oo d E
�
a �u
s a gA
Ht
aao ° § "ta
c gma
_mcmE Ul2
ip vomem
w §�asoo
eu',sES "g
°h8 >o�e
m
0
m
�a
z
°€
d
`oo
¢
J
a �u
s a gA
Ht
aao ° § "ta
c gma
_mcmE Ul2
ip vomem
w §�asoo
eu',sES "g
°h8 >o�e
Kent Friedrichsen
5913 Fairfield Road
Mound, MN 55364
April 28, 2014
Attn: City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364 -1687
This letter is in response to the City Of Mound letter dated April 15, 2014 from Community
Development Director Sarah Smith regarding the Major Subdivision Concept /Sketch plan application
that was deemed complete and ready for review by the City of Mound Planning Commission from
myself the applicant and the response letter from the City of Mound reviewed based on Staff's review of
the submitted materials, of the application (Kent Friedrichsen) originallay submitted on and additional
information requested in the RE: Determination of Completeness - Determination of Completeness —
Concept /Sketch Plan from Community Development Director, Sarah Smith. Plan
The City of Mound Staff has confirmed the Major Subdivision Concept /Sketch Application has been
reviewed and Deemed complete. With regards to the proposed Major Subdivision Concept /Sketch Plan
request, Staff respectfully offers the following comments.
Applicant's response to comments to City of Mound Determination of Completeness — Major
Subdivision Concept /Sketch Application Determination of Completeness — Concept /Sketch Plan letter
dated April 15, . 2014 follwing revised plan submitted March 26, 2014 from comments from February
2014 meeting.
Responses to Comments from April 15, 2014 letter from City of Mound.
Comments and Responses
1. Additional information needed about the proposed 4.7 figure noted atthe rear of Lot 1. We are
thinking it may be referencing the distance to the existing building on the lot to the south but
are not certain.
Response: the figure. 4.7 referenced is correct and from the property line. The building
(garage) on neighbors property located at 5924 Idlewood Road is ten feet south of the property
line. So the distance is correct on the Major Subdivsion Concept /Sketch Plan otherwise the
garage would be build up to the property line which it is not.
-18- -951-
2. If possible if would be nice to have approximate size of the future homes. This information does
not need to be included on the survey but should be provided as supplemental information for
review.
Response: The target size of the homes is approximately 3600 square feet finished. Since these
will be custom homes the exact size cannot be determined at this time. Also, it depends on the
market demand and consumer preference after final plat is approved. Builders will not provide
specific cost information etc. until prelimary or final plat is approved according to the 5 or six
builders I have had review the Major Concept /Sketch application. The initial target market price
of homes was in 375, 000 to 450,000 range. This ultimately will depend on when and if approval
comes forward as far as timing and what the market will desire at that time. So information
provided is initial assumption, but could change slightly depending on when lots are ready and
homes available to be marketed.
3. We have some concern about the proposed amount of impervious coverage as the submitted
materials do not show stoops and sidewalks to the front door. However, the driveways do
appear to bit on the large size so there will probably be room to accommodate them. As you
are aware, hard cover on non lots or record is limited to no more than 30 percent.
Response: All Final New Construction home applications will meet the city requirements of no
More than 30 percent of each lot being impervious coverage. This would include steps
sidewalks etc. The house pads included in the Major Subdivision Concept /Sketch plan display
the largest amount possible that a house meeting all the set back requirements etc. could be
not the actual final size.
4. Staff is evaluating the submitted information for the proposed lots related to the applicable
codes regulations for frontage /width /depth /setbacks, etc. to determine the need for
variance(s) approval including, not limited to, a lot depth variance on lot 3.
Response: Applicant understands and will comply with and submit requests for any required
variances that may be needed per city codes and regulations. Although are goal in the Major
Subdivision Concept /Sketch Plan meeting with City staff and interested third parties in February
that the new submitted plan hopefully as minimized or eliminated as many variances as possible
if not all.
5. Preliminary comments were received from Lynn Longfield from Xcel Energy by email on March
27, 2014 and are being forwarded to you as a separate email. Staff was also copied on an email
from Ms. Longfield to you on April 7, 2014.
Response: I have been proactively since July of 2013 contacting the utilities companies to
gather information and requirements for any development or impacts and cost that may arise
from the project. Lynn Longfield has been extremely helpful and responsive to my questions
-19- -952-
and needs. I have been gathering as much preliminary detail for cost estimates etc. She
provided the worksheet that was emailed to you and myself as information Xcel will need to
estimate cost, timing etc. of project possible needs for electrical utility changes. Currently
believe each new house would not need more than 400 amp service at most and I expect to pay
for all lines to be buried to new and any existing properties that may be impacted across the
projects property.
6. Additional comments and questions regarding the proposed Concept /Sketch plan may come up
as we proceed with preparation of the Planning Report in advance of future planning
commission meeting. At this time, the possible date for Planning Commission review is Tuesday
May 6, 2014. If requested City Council Review of the proposed Concept /Sketch Plan would be
scheduled as soon as possible following review from Planning Commission.
Response: Will be available to answer any questions or comments that can be answered for this
application if needed and will respond as soon as possible and with best available information.
If there are any comments or questions that do come up before Planning Commission meeting
or during this application process, please let me know. I can be reached at 952- 334 -8390 or
kentfriedrichsen@Vahoo.com.
Sincerely,
Kent Friedrichsen
Applicant
5913 Fairfield Road
Mound, MN 55364
-20- -953-
Sarah Smith
Subject: FW: Response to City of Mound Major Subdivision Concept/Sketch Plan Feeback
Attachments: Kent Friedrichsen 04282014 Response City Of Mound.pdf
From: Kent Friedrichsen [ mailto :kentfriedrichsen@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 3:17 PM
To: Sarah Smith; Christopher Ockwig; lynn .m.longfield(cDxceleneroy.com
Subject: Fw: Response to City of Mound Major Subdivision Concept /Sketch Plan Feeback
Update to response to item #5.
Load per house. Per my building contacts expect 200 amp load on occassion would run 200 amp &150 amp fines
if customer requested based on need. What I can say for now. Expect all lines existing and new to be buried on project
property.
Kent Friedrichsen
5913 Fairfield RD
Mound, MN 55364
952 - 334 -8390
On Monday, April 28, 2014 2:37 PM, Kent Friedrichsen <kentfriedrichsenQyahoo. corn > wrote:
Hi Sarah, Please see attached document for responses to your letter 04152014 and 03272014 regarding comments and questions on the Major
Subdivision Concept/Sketch Plan.
Sincerely,
Kent Friedrichsen
5913 Fairfield RD
Mound, MN 55364
952 - 334 -8390
21- -954-
PREPARED FOR: KENT FRIEDRICHSEN
PROJECT NO. 15255.00
SCALE : 1" =30'
(985.6) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION
Existing Zoning R2
No On Street Parking Allowed
Maximum Impervious Allowed = 3017o
Minimum Lot Depth = 80 Feet
Minimum Lot Width = 40 Feet
O
Q
r
OV
C
rn
C
C LE
UCL
�
Q
O)
Z o
t i
I FD IF
980.2
PROPOSED SPILLWAY TNH
981P4 40 N Ng
807H SIDES SIGNS
H SIDES OF STREET o EXISTING A
FD IF N TO BE REMOVED Y
980.9 SIDE 33 FD IF 962.0
98A' � l7
FD IF
24 983.2
`\ 74.2 , -' LOT 4 i I
\ 8,008 SF 00 0 0 �'if EXISTING H USE
X ul
�\ z 0 o �W °VIII f
\ o zm
\ LL 24.0 f
\ FD IP co i
Front Setback = 20 Feet Min.
Rear Setback = 15 Feet Min.
Side Setback = 10 Feet Min.
O
Lot Front Side Rear Depth Width o
(20'Req) (10'Req) (15'Req) (80'Req) (40'Req)
1. 20.0 *20.2 15.3 111.4 87.8
2. 20.5 *25.0 15.3 108.7 90.5
3. 20.0 *16.7 15.1 74.2 98.2
(* indicates shortest side setback
CONSULTING ENGINEERS,
PLANNERS and LAND SI
RING
IN4, INC.
m._-1
\ -" t,
985.2
r
1
�
FD IF `FD IF'
4b
CP
75 f
1 985.1 980.2
\
` SIDE
�l 68
`,
T
�`'o
9, 755 SF
2
-tJ
CV
`
A
O=
8,843 SF \
��
t
~\
!Y1
di
87.81
90.5
O
C._ "'\I ILLU ROAD
FD IF
LOT N 3 f 986.4 FD IF
985--"
f 987.2)
E / ^I
1_ �`
�
988.9 ,r^� f f
04 f7
� I I w
�I 3�
3f �{
=I
zf
o$f
3
N
2
�%9ryf N
iI 0
x
O
Z
W
I
I
I
BUILDING
LOT 11
PREPARED FOR: KENT FRIEDRICHSEN
PROJECT N0. 15255.00
SCALE : 1" =30'
(985.6) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION
Exi5tinej Zoning R2
No On Street Parking Allowed
Maximum Impervious Allowed = 30%
Minimum Lot Depth = 80 Feet
Minimum Lot Width = 40 Feet
Front Setback
= 20 Feet
Rear
Setback
= 15 Feet
Side
Setback
= 10 Feet
Lot
Lot
30% Max.
Impervious Area
Area
Imp. Allowed
Proposed
1.
9,755 sf.
2,926 sf.
2,917 sf.
2.
8,843 sf.
2,653 sf.
2,648 sf.
3.
8,008 sf.
2,402 sf.
2,401 sf.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS,
ROBE PLANNERS and LAND SIJR%
NGINEERING
COMPRNY, INC.
T 148th ST.. SM 240. WMISW I F MN 55337 PH
W
CONCEPT SHEET 2 of 2
FD IF I
980.2 u
i
I
I
ELD�"
WV READ
fD IF
992.2
1
a
N
EXISTING
BUILDING
—LOT 11
1
MEMORANDUM
May 8, 2014
To: City Mayor and City Council
From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer
Subject: Request for Action on a On -Sale Liquor License and Sunday Liquor License for
Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails, LLC
Proposed Action:
MOTION BY SECONDED BY , TO APPROVE AN
INTOXICATING ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE FOR
STEPHANI BOYUM AND PAUL BOYUM FOR CATTAILS KITCHEN N COCKTAILS,
LLC AT 2544 COMMERCE BOULEVARD IN THE CITY, CONDITIONAL UPON ALL
REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENSING BEING MET.
Overview:
On April 8, 2014, the City Council approved Resolution 14 -24 which is a Conditional Use
Permit for a Class III Liquor Service Restaurant for the property at 2544 Commerce Boulevard.
An intoxicating on -sale liquor license and Sunday on -sale liquor license application was
submitted to the City on October 23, 2013 by Stephani Boyum for the operation of a new
restaurant business to be known as Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails, LLC, located at 2544
Commerce Boulevard in the City.
Conditional Use Permit
Per Resolution 14 -24, the resolution will not be released for recording at Hennepin County until
conditions 7, 11, and 17 contained in the CUP have been satisfied and an escrow of sufficient
amount is on file with the City. Condition 17 states that the resolution will not be released for
recording at Hennepin County until the liquor license has been approved by the City.
Liquor License Application
On receipt of an application, City Code, Section 6- 49(a), requires the city to conduct a
preliminary background and financial investigation on the applicant. Ms. Boyum's license
application included a rental agreement with Mr. Paul Boyum. Mr. Boyum testified on the
-957 -
printed on recycled paper
conditional use permit application at the March 12, 2014 regular City Council meeting. In his
testimony, Mr. Boyum indicated that he is not only a landlord but also a major investor in Ms.
Boyum's business. Pursuant to Minnesota Rules, 7515.0410 (F), and City Code, Section 6 -50,
which prohibit the issuance of the retail liquor license to someone leasing the premises from an
ineligible licensee. As such, the city regards Ms. Boyum and Mr. Boyum as co- applicants and a
background and financial investigation was undertaken for both. The Orono Police Department
undertook the required investigation and has provided a written recommendation and report to
the Council as required by Section 6- 49(b). The Orono Police Chief's written recommendation is
included in this packet and the background investigation report is included under separate cover.
City Code, Section 6- 49(a), provides that no license shall be issued if the results of the
investigation show to the satisfaction of the Council that issuance would not be in the public
interest.
City Staff noted that the applicants' business plan, as submitted to the city, indicates that Ms.
Boyum intends to provide server training to her employees. Although such training is not a
current city code requirement, City Staff recommends such training as being in the public
interest.
State law requires that the license be issued only for a space that is compact and contiguous.
Staff notes that the CUP and associated liquor licenses will be limited to the proposed floor plan
prepared by RDS Architects and submitted to the City by the applicants for inclusion in the CUP
request. The area was also defined in condition #2 of the CUP resolution as follows:
2. The CUP for the Class III liquor service restaurant is limited to the proposed
floor plan and seating area plans as shown on the modified plan submitted on
2 -19 -2014 that was prepared by Richard Storlien of RIDS Architects. Use of
the former banquet area for restaurant use is not part of the current CUP and,
therefore, not allowed. Conversion of the former banquet area, which is
currently shown as office and storage space, and any future outdoor dining
area or patio are not part of the current CUP request and are, therefore, not
allowed unless a CUP amendment is approved.
The applicants provided the City Clerk with an incomplete certificate of insurance. The
applicants have not yet provided proof of compliance with the state workers compensation
insurance requirements. The City Clerk also notes that the certificate indicates that the current
insurance policies expire on 7 -1 -14.
The staff recommends issuance of the liquor license for the Licensed Premises subject to the
applicant providing the City Clerk with a complete certificate of insurance, the payment of all
required fees and charges, and compliance with the requirements of local, state, and federal law,
ordinance, and regulation.
Primary Matter(s) for Consideration:
• Is the issuance of the requested license in the public interest?
Budgetary/Fiscal Issues :
The applicants have paid the investigation fee required by City Code. The annual fee for an on -sale
intoxicating liquor license in the City is $5,000 and a Sunday on -sale liquor license is $200. Pursuant to
City Code, section 6- 48(c), this amount is prorated such that the license fee due at this time is $433.33,
which assumes the license is issued in June of 2014 for one month. The applicants will be required to
request a license renewal effective July I" with payment of at least % of the annual fee due by June 30'h
and the remaining %z due by December 31 st
Attachments:
Resolution No. 14 -24 — CUP
Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails, LLC Business Plan
RDS Architects Modified Seating Plan for Cattails Bar & Restaurant
Written Recommendation from Orono Police Chief, Correy Famiok
Application and Background Investigation Report (provided in a separate packet/please return to Staff
after the meeting).
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -24
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) APPLICATION
FROM STEPHANI BOYUM FOR A CLASS III LIQUOR SERVICE RESTAURANT, AS
DEFINED BY CITY CODE SEC. 129 -2 AT 2544 COMMERCE BOULEVARD TO BE
CALLED CATTAILS KITCHEN N COCKTAILS
PC CASE NO. 13 -32
WHEREAS, applicant, Stephani Boyum, submitted an application for a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) for a Class III restaurant for a proposed new restaurant called "Cattails
Kitchen N Cocktails" to be located at 2544 Commerce Boulevard. The CUP would allow
for alcoholic beverages to be served in the restaurant and also to have both live and pre-
recorded entertainment; and
WHEREAS, the subject property, which is commonly known as the former Chamberlain -
Goudy VFW Post No. 5113 (or VFW club), consists of the following described parcels in
the Hennepin County Property Information system:
23- 117 -24 -11 -0028
23- 117 -24 -11 -0009
23- 117 -24 -11 -0010
; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is owned by First Minnesota Bank who consented to
the CUP application; and
WHEREAS, First Minnesota Bank entered into a purchase agreement to sell the
property to Paul Boyum. The building and property are to be leased from the proposed
new owner (dba PFB Properties LLC) to Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails LLC, with Stephani
Boyum serving as its owner; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is zoned B -1 Business District; and
WHEREAS, a Class III liquor service restaurant is allowed in the B -1 Business District
upon approval of a CUP; and
WHEREAS, Sec. 129 -2, defines as a Class III liquor service restaurant as follows:
; and
"Class 111 liquor service restaurant means restaurants where food and
intoxicating liquors are served and consumed by customers while seated at a
counter or table and /or restaurants which contain entertainment, either live or
prerecorded. Food sales in such facilities shall account for a minimum of 50
percent of a restaurant's gross receipts on an annual basis."
•.w
Resolution No. 14 -24
WHEREAS, the property fronts Commerce Boulevard on the west side and the Lost
Lake wetland, which is part of Lake Minnetonka, on the east side. The property is
bordered by the Gillespie Center to the south and a single - family residential use to the
north. There is off street parking available on the south and east sides of the property.
There is also on street parking located on the east side of Commerce Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails will be a full service restaurant with an
operating liquor license to sell on premise alcoholic beverages. As part of the requested
CUP, they also plan to offer live entertainment (i.e. bands, comedians, etc.) and pre-
recorded music (i.e. karaoke, juke box, DJ, etc.). They also plan to host special events
several times a year; and
WHEREAS, the existing space in the building that was formerly used as a banquet or
special event hall will be used for offices and storage space and will not be used for
restaurant space. The applicant has also indicated that they may want to construct an
outdoor patio area in the future. Use of the existing banquet space for restaurant or
rental space and the construction of outdoor patio activities would require additional
review as a CUP amendment; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a liquor license application which is currently
under review by the City; and
WHEREAS, details regarding the proposal are contained in Planning Report No. 13 -32,
Executive Summary No. 13 -32, and the supporting materials provided by the applicant;
and
WHEREAS, Sec. 129.38 requires that all requests for Conditional Use Permits are
reviewed by the Planning Commission and also requires that a public hearing be held by
the City Council. Procedurally, state statute requires that the planning agency and /or
governing body must hold a public hearing on all requests for Conditional Use Permits;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Conditional Use Permit application
for the proposed 215 seat, liquor service restaurant at its January 21, 2014 special
meeting and recommended Council approval, subject to conditions, as recommended by
Staff; and
WHEREAS, following the Planning Commission meeting, a modified floor plan signed by
a licensed architect was submitted for review which reduced the seating for the
proposed restaurant to 135 seats and also showed the space on the north side of the
building to be used for offices and storage space; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing at its March 12, 2014 meeting to
receive public testimony on the proposed Conditional Use Permit; and
WHEREAS, the City has considered the proposed project as it might affect public health,
safety or welfare and will be imposing conditions upon the approval addressing these
considerations; and
me
Resolution No. 14 -24
WHEREAS, in granting approval of the Conditional Use Permit, the City Council makes
the following findings of fact:
The proposed restaurant use is deemed to be similar to the former VFW club
which had included a restaurant and banquet room and had an operating liquor
license.
Sufficient parking exists on and around the subject site to accommodate the
restaurant use.
3. Class III liquor service restaurants are allowed in the B -1 District by conditional
use.
4. Reuse and infill of existing buildings is viewed as favorable.
5. The criteria in Sec. 1 29-38(a) of the City Code are met.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota as follows:
Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining a liquor license from the City
of Mound and State of Minnesota which shall include the submittal of all
required information. Approval of the CUP for a Class III restaurant does
not guarantee or entitle applicant to any future approval of a liquor
license.
The CUP for the Class III liquor service restaurant is limited to the
proposed floor plan and seating area plans as shown on the modified
plan submitted on 2 -19 -2014 that was prepared by Richard Storlien of
RIDS Architects. Use of the former banquet area for restaurant use is not
part of the current CUP and, therefore, not allowed. Conversion of the
former banquet area, which is currently shown as office and storage
space, and any future outdoor dining area or patio are not part of the
current CUP request and are, therefore, not allowed unless a CUP
amendment is approved.
3. The City reserves the right to require future evaluation of the site related
to the Class III restaurant CUP for Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails, if needed,
in the event parking becomes a problem. This may include review and
processing of a CUP amendment, if deemed appropriate, including the
need to provide additional parking, reduction in the seating capacity, or
other action to fit the use to available parking. Applicant is advised that
deficient parking or failure to provide adequate parking for the existing
use and proposed use(s) is considered a violation of the Conditional Use
Permit and therefore subject to regulations pursuant to City Code Section
129.38.
4. Applicant shall be required to follow all local and state regulations relating
to when alcoholic beverages may be allowed to be served.
5. Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all required local or agency
962-
Resolution No. 14 -24
permits. In addition to the liquor license, including but not limited to, the
required licensing approvals from Hennepin County for the new
restaurant and all applicable permits required by the building and fire
codes, prior to undertaking work.
6. Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any and or all related permits
or approvals from the City required for special or outdoor events.
Approval of the CUP for a Class III restaurant does not guarantee or
entitle applicant to any future approval of any permit required for special
or outdoor events.
7. Applicant is responsible for obtaining a Sewer Availability Charge (SAC)
determination from the MCES in the event the restaurant use changes or
expands. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of related charges.
As applicable, the CUP shall not be effective until written confirmation
from the MCES is received and payment is made.
8. Applicant shall place outdoor ash trays in any outdoor areas where
smoking may occur and shall be responsible for daily routine
maintenance of this area as well as the entire property and adjacent
sidewalk area to include pick up and removal of trash /refuse and
improperly disposed cigarettes.
9. Signage shall conform to the regulations contained in City Code Chapter
119 (Signs). Applicant or designated representative shall be responsible
for obtaining all required permitting prior to undertaking work.
10. The individual parcels that make up the subject property shall be
combined.
11. Payment of all fees associated with review of the applicant's request for
Class III restaurant use including, but not limited to, the CUP and any
and /or all related activities.
12. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the County Recorder
or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36,
Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may
be used.
13. The resolution will not be released for recording at Hennepin County until
conditions 7, 11, and 17 contained herein have been satisfied and an
escrow of sufficient amount Is on file with the City.
14. The applicant shall have the responsibility of filing the resolution with
Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. The
applicant shall also be responsible for providing proof of recording and
providing evidence of such recording with the City of Mound. At its
option, the applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with
the fees to be taken out of the escrow.
15. The restaurant shall meet the City Code regulation and MPCA noise
-963-
Resolution No. 14 -24
standards for ambient noise.
16. This conditional use permit amendment is approved for the following
legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property
Information System:
Lots 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 32;
That pad of the West 30 feet of Lot 33, lying between the Easterly extensions of the Northerly and Southerly lines of Lot 26 as measured
along said extensions;
That pad of Lot 33, lying Southerly of the Easterly extensions of the Northerly line of Lot 30 across said Lot 33; All in Auditor's Subdivision
No. 167, Hennepin County, Minn.
17. This resolution will not be released for recording at Hennepin County until
the liquor license has been approved by the City.
Adopted this 8th day of April, 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Mark Hanus, Mayor
MM
Kb L LC,
Created for the City Of Mound, MN
By: Stephani Boyum owner of Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails LLC.
Mission- Is to provide a safe, friendly, fun environment
to bring the community together.
To become one of the leading dining and entertainment
venues in Mound MN.
Objectives
Personal Plan- Includes the implementation of fulfilling
necessary positions to operate effectively and efficiently.
Jobs will be created for wait staff, bartenders, bouncers,
cooks, cleaning and maintenance, musicians, sober cab
drivers, book keepers and management as needed.
Target Market- Customers are individuals, families, friends,
organizations, etc. who prefer casual dining and beverages
(alcohol or not) and entertainment.
Management- Will be lead by Stephani Boyum and Paul
Boyum. Paul's background experience encompasses
previous bar & grill ownership, sober cab management, and
construction (electrical) services. These entities have
provided Paul with invaluable experiences in tavern
V
operations, customer service, safety procedures and
consumer preferences and habits.
Community involvement- Will include, but not be limited to
implementing the assisted funding program of charitable
organizations through pull -tab sales, meat raffles, bingo,
video racing, etc. examples of these programs may be
community Hockey Associations, Football programs, and
other supporting organizations deemed non - profit. Benefits
will be held on occasion when approached for the monetary
need related to health issues and other individual family and
or organization crisis. Benefits may also be hosted for fund-
raising groups etc. such benefits are an act of community
involvement and good will gesture.
Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails Ilc. will be a full service
restaurant with an operating liquor license.
Financial- our objective is to establish a profitable, self
supporting full service restaurant.
Business ours- 8:00am- 1:00am Sunday through Saturday
(subject to vary)
Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails Ilc. will provide a full spread
menu, also including breakfast. (see menu attached)
Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails Ilc. will provide a wide variety
of music including but not limited to live bands (guitars,
drums, bass, jazz, blues) Juke box, karaoke, DJ,
Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails lic. will provide
activities \events among all ages including but not limited to;
Grand opening, Car shows, Comedy shows, MMA fights,
benefits,
-965 -A
Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails lic. will provide a non profit
organization to host such things; pull tabs, meat raffle, "bar"
bingo,
This organization will also provide any "non profit temporary
permits or license" in which any event Cattails holds is
required.
Marketing Strategies-
Advertising- strategies will be incorporated through means
of media, signage, web design, and more.
Products- for sale will include food, beverage, apparel,
accessories, items with Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails Ilc. logo
for advertising and revenue purposes.
Activities- such as tent \outdoor will be held to gain public
awareness of the facility and to enhance sales.
Music- live music will be provided for the entertainment and
leisure experience.
- 965 -i3
Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails will provide a wide range of
responsibly trained staff including but not limited to;
General Manager
Assistant Manager of all areas
Cooks \Chief
Bartenders
Servers
Waitress
Security
*All persons serving alcoholic beverages will complete
certification through Minnesota Alcohol Server Training
Course Outline
Alcohol Awareness
Intoxication and alcohol elimination factors
The effects of blood alcohol content
® Signs of impairment; poly- impairments and club drugs
Server Responsibilities
® Monitor, card, intervene, and document
® Duty of care; drinking is a privilege
® SCAB customer unwanted behavior assessment
Carding
® When and why to check ID
7 Steps of Checking IN
Inteventions
® When to intervene
intervention methods and techniques
Minnesota Alcohol Laws
® Current Minnesota laws
Valid Minnesota identification procedures and techniques
Surrounding states IDs
Thank you for taking the time to review the Business Plan
As I am prepared to enter a business venture through the
creation of Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails in Mound MN I am
equally prepared to contribute to the community by providing
Jobs, creating revenue, contributing to the success of
charitable organizations, and hosting events for the leisure
and enjoyment of those attending.
I look forward to working with the city of Mound and I will
take responsibility in maintaining a safe, clean and enjoyable
facility for our community and patrons.
will abide by the laws governing the city, county, and state.
-967-
nDS
�A'RCCH-
Toe City of Mound plan review
Frame Rick Storiien
Datee 2/2812014
Re* Cattails Bar & Restaurant
Letter to confirm proposed seating capadty of new Restaurant and Bar.
Bar seating capacity = 31 stools
Dining Room seating 21 tables wl4 seats ea. = 84 seats
Game Room/ Dance area 5 tables wl4 seats ea. = 20 seats
Parking requirements minimum of 1 stall per 3 seats
Total seating = 135 seatsI3 = 45 parking stalls required. 68 stalls provided on site.
Feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns regarding the project.
Richard Storlien RDS Architects Ltd.
rick @rdsarc.com
1 -968-
rill
Proudly Serving Orono, Minnetonka Beach, Spring Park and Mound
Dedicated to Fairness, Service, Pride and Quality
May 5, 2014
Mound City Council,
The Orono Police Department has conducted a background investigation and local records
checks to include cities that the following have lived or have had businesses in. The persons
listed below have no violations or prior conduct that would prevent them from being issued a
liquor license per MN State Statute 340A.402.
Business: Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails
2544 Commerce Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364
Applicants: Stephani Marie Boyum
6058 Old Kiving Blvd.
Anoka, MN 55303
Paul Francis Boyum
6058 Old Kiving Blvd.
Anoka, MN 55303
If you have any further questions or concern, please feel free to contact this department at 952-
249 -4700.
Mailing Address. 2730 KeTicy earkway - Orono, MN 55356
Police 911 ^ Administration 952 -249 -4700 • Non - Emergency 763 - 525 -6210 • Fax 952- 476 -3028
Websim: http : / /www.ci.orono.mn,usi'police
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION
FOR GAMBLING AT CATTAILS KITCHEN N COCKTAILS, LLC
WHEREAS, the Northwest Tonka Lions, Inc. has submitted a Premises Permit
Application for gambling, abiding by the laws of Minnesota governing lawful and rules of
the Gambling Control Board; and
WHEREAS, the local government must adopt a resolution specifically approving or
denying said application; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, hereby approves a Premises Permit Application submitted by the Northwest
Tonka Lions, Inc., for Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails, LLC, for submission to the Gambling
Control Board.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of May, 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
-971-
Mayor Mark Hanus
MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING
LG214 Premises Permit Application
12/12 Page 1 of 2
Annual Fee $150 (NON REFUNDABLE)
Required Attachments to LG214
1. If the premises is leased, attach a copy of your lease.
Mail the application and required attachments to:
Use LG215 Lease for Lawful Gambling Activity.
Gambling Control Board
2. $150 annual premises permit fee, for each permit
1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South
(non refundable).
Roseville, MN 55113
Make check payable to "State of Minnesota."
Questions? Call 651 - 539 -1900 and ask for Licensing.
Organization Information
1. Organization name Northwest Tonka Lions, Inc. License number 01830
2. Chief executive officer (CEO) Roy Peterson Daytime phone (952) 210 -6626
3. Gambling manager Marjorie Lemke Daytime phone (612) 597 -5357
Gambling Premises Information
4. Current name of site where gambling will be conducted Cattails Kitchen & Cocktails
S. List any previous names for this location Chamberlain- GoudyvFW 5113 -Mound
6. Street address where premises is located 2544 Commerce Blvd
Do not use a P.O. box number or mailing address.
7. City Township
OR
County Zip code
Mound
Hennepin 55364
8. Does your organization own the building where the gambling will be conducted?
F] Yes l r v i No If no, attach LG215 Lease for Lawful Gambling Activity.
A lease is not required if only a raffle will be conducted.
this OYes z No ❑Don't know
9. Is any other organization conducting gambling at site?
HNo
at this site? E]Don't know
10. Has your organization previously conducted gambling —ZYes
Gambling Bank Account Information. Must be in Minnesota.
11. Bank name Bank account number
Crow River Bank Mound Minnesota 09123
12. Bank street address City State Zip code
2290 Commerce Blvd Mound MN 55364
All Temporary and Permanent Off -site Storage Spaces
13. Address (Do not use a P.O. box number) City State Zip code
2590 Commerce Blvd Mound MN 55364
14. Address (Do not use a P.O. box number) City State Zip code
MN
-972-
LG214 Premises Permit Application
12/12 Page 2 of 2
by Local Unit of Government: Approval by Resolution
CITY APPROVAL
COUNTY APPROVAL
rAcknowledgment
for a gambling premises
for a gambling premises
located within city imits Localunitofgovernment
Y must
-
Sign located in a township
County name
Date approved by city council
Date approved by county board
Resolution number
Resolution number
Signature of city personnel
Signature of county personnel
Title Date signed
Title Date signed
TOWNSHIP NAME
Complete below only if required by the county.
On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization
is applying to conduct gambling activity within the township
limits. [A township has no statutory authority to approve or
deny an application, per Minnesota Statutes 349.213, Subd. 2.]
Print township name
Signature of township officer
Title Date
Acknowledgment and Oath
1. I hereby consent that local law enforcement officers, 6. I assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful
the Board or its agents, and the commissioners of operation of all activities to be conducted.
revenue or public safety and their agents may enter 7. I will familiarize myself with the laws of Minnesota
and inspect the premises. governing lawful gambling and rules of the Board and
2. The Board and its agents, and the commissioners agree, if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules,
of revenue and public safety and their agents are including amendments to them.
authorized to inspect the bank records of the 8. Any changes in application information will be submitted
gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill to the Board no later than 10 days after the change has
requirements of current gambling rules and law. taken effect.
3. I have read this application and all information 9. I understand that failure to provide required information
submitted to the Board is true, accurate, and or providing false or misleading information may result
complete. in the denial or revocation of the license.
4. All required information has been fully disclosed. 10. I understand the fee is nonrefundable regardless of
5. 7am the chief exec t ve officer of eorganizatlon. license approval /de ial.
Signature of thi xe&btive Officer (designee may not sign) Date
Print name Roy Peterson CEO
Data privacy notice: The information requested on this Board. All other information provided will be Safety; Attorney General; Commissioners
form (and any attachments) will be used by the Gambling private data about your organization until of Administration, Minnesota Management
Control Board (Board) to determine your organization's the Board issues the permit. When the & Budget, and Revenue; Legislative
qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling activities in Board issues the permit, all information Auditor, national and international gam -
Minnesota. Your organization has the right to refuse to provided will become public. If the Board bling regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant
supply the information; however, if your organization does not issue a permit, all information to court order; other individuals and
refuses to supply this information, the Board may not be provided remains private, with the excep- agencies specifically authorized by state
able to determine your organization's qualifications and, tion of your organization's name and or federal law to have access to the
as a consequence, may refuse to issue a permit. If your address which will remain public. information; individuals and agencies for
organization supplies the information requested, the Board Private data about your organization are which law or legal order authorizes a new
will be able to process your organization's application. available to: Board members, Board staff use or sharing of information after this
Your organization's name and address will be public infor- whose work requires access to the infor- notice was given; and anyone with your
mation when received by the mation; Minnesota's Department of Public written consent.
This form will be made available in alternative format, i.e. large -,raille, upon request.
-973-
MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING
LG215 Lease for Lawful Gambling Activity Revised 11/12 Page 1 of 2
Organization
Address
License /site number
Daytime phone
Northwest Tonka Lions Inc.
P.O. Box 201/259990 Commerce Blvd. Mound 55364
01830
612- 597 -5357
Name of leased premises
Cattails Kitchen & Cocktails
Street address
2544 Commerce Blvd.
City
Mound
State
MN
Zip
55364
Daytime phone
763- 412 -2682
Name of legal owner
Business /street address
Blvd.
City
Mound
State
MN
Zip
55364
Daytime phone
76
Stephani Boyum
2544 Commerce
-
Name of lessor [if same as
8"ner, write in "SAME"
_
Check applicable item:
1. New lease. Do not submit existing lease with amended changes.
Date that the changes will be effective. Submit changes at least 10 days before the effective date of the change.
2. New owner. Effective date Submit new lease within 10 days after new lessor assumes ownership.
Check all activity that will be conducted (No lease required for raffles)
❑✓
❑Electronic pull-tabs [must also sell paper pull -tabs]
Pull tabs [paper]
❑Linked electronic bingo
dispensing device
❑
Puli -tabs [paper] with
❑Bar
Electronic games may only be conducted at:
bingo ❑ Bingo (1) a premises licensed for the on -sale or off -sale of intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent
Tipboards malt beverages [but does not include a general food store or drug store permitted to sell
alcoholic beverages under Minn. Stat. 340A.405, subdivision I]; or
Paddlewheel ❑ Paddlewheel with table (2) a premises where bingo is conducted as the primary business and has a seating
capacity of at least 100.
PULL -TAB, TIPBOARD AND PADDLEWHEEL RENT
Separate rent for booth and bar ops.
BOOTH OPERATION - Some or all sales of gambling; equipment are conducted by an employee /volunteer of a
licensed organization at leased premises.
ALL GAMES, including electronic games - Monthly rent to be paid, _%, not to exceed 10% of gross profits for that month.
• Total rent paid from all organizations for only booth operations at the leased premises may not exceed $1,750.
• The rent cap does not include BAR OPERATION rent for electronic games conducted by the lessor.
'IBAR OPERATION - All sales of gambling( equipment conducted by the lessor or lessor's employee.
ELECTRONIC GAMES - Monthly rent to be paid, _ %, not to exceed 15% of the gross profits for that month from
electronic pull -tab games and electronic linked bingo games.
ALL OTHER GAMES - Monthly rent to be paid, 10 %, not to exceed 20% of gross profits from all other forms of lawful gambling.
• If any booth sales conducted by a licensed organization at the premises rent may not exceed 10% of gross profits for
that month and is subject to booth operation $1750 cap.
BINGO RENT for leased premises where bingo is the primary business conducted, such as bingo hall.
Bingo rent is limited to one of the following:
• Rent to be paid, %, not to exceed 10% of the monthly gross profit from all lawful gambling activities held during
bingo occasions, excluding bar bingo.
-OR -
• Rate to be paid $ per square foot, not to exceed 110% of a comparable cost per square foot for leased space, as
approved by the director of the Gambling Control Board. The lessor must attach documentation, verified by the organization,
to confirm the comparable rate and all applicable costs to be paid by the organization to the lessor.
• Rent may not be paid for bar bingo.
• Bar bingo does not include bingo games linked to other permitted premises.
LEASE TERMINATION CLAUSE. Must be completed.;
The lease may be terminated by either party with a written 30 day notice.
Other terms Ni items paid for by The Northwest Tanks Lions must be removeable upon lamination of the lease.
974-
0
LG215 Lease for Lawful Gambling Activity Revised 11/12 Page 2 of 2
Lease Term - The term of this agreement will be concurrent with the Other Prohibitions - The lessor will not impose restrictions
premises permit issued by the Gambling Control Board (Board). on the organization with respect to providers (distributor or
linked bingo game provider) of gambling - related equipment
Management - The owner of the premises or the lessor will not and services or in the use of net profits for lawful purposes.
manage the conduct of lawful gambling at the premises
The organization may not conduct any activity on behalf of the lessor
on the leased premises.
Participation as Players Prohibited - The lessor will not
participate directly or indirectly as a player in any lawful gambling
conducted on the premises. The lessor's immediate family and any
agents or gambling employees of the lessor will not participate as
players in the conduct of lawful gambling on the premises, except
as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 349.181.
Illegal Gambling - The lessor is aware of the prohibition against
illegal gambling in Minnesota Statutes 609.75, and the penalties for
illegal gambling violations in Minnesota Rules 7865.0220, Subpart 3.
In addition, the Board may authorize the organization to withhold
rent for a period of up to 90 days if the Board determines that
illegal gambling occurred on the premises or that the lessor or its
employees participated in the illegal gambling or knew of the
gambling and did not take prompt action to stop the gambling.
Continued tenancy of the organization is authorized without payment
of rent during the time period determined by the Board for violations
of this provision, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 349.18,
Subdivision 1(a).
To the best of the lessor's knowledge, the lessor affirms that any
and all games or devices located on the premises are not being used,
and are not capable of being used, in a manner that violates the
prohibitions against illegal gambling in Minnesota Statutes 609.75.
Notwithstanding Minnesota Rules 7865.0220, Subpart 3, an
organization must continue making rent payments under the terms
of this lease, if the organization or its agents are found to be solely
responsible for any illegal gambling, conducted at this site, that is
prohibited by Minnesota Rules 7861.0260, Subpart 1, item H or
Minnesota Statutes 609.75, unless the organization's agents
responsible for the illegal gambling activity are also agents or
employees of the lessor.
The lessor must not modify or terminate the lease in whole or in
part because the organization reported, to a state or local law
enforcement authority or the Board, the conduct of illegal gambling
activity at this site in which the organization did not participate.
Acknowledgment of Lease Terms
The lessor, the lessor's immediate family, any person residing
in the same residence as the lessor, and any agents or
employees of the lessor will not require the organization to
perform any action that would violate statute or rule. The
lessor must not modify or terminate this lease in whole or in
part due to the lessor's violation of this provision. If there is
a dispute as to whether a violation occurred, the lease will
remain in effect pending a final determination by the
Compliance Review Group (CRG) of the Gambling Control
Board. The lessor agrees to arbitration when a violation of
this provision is alleged. The arbitrator shall be the CRG.
Access to permitted premises - Consent is given to the
Board and its agents, the commissioners of revenue and public
safety and their agents, and law enforcement personnel to
enter and inspect the permitted premises at any reasonable
time during the business hours of the lessor. The organization
has access to the premises during any time reasonable and
when necessary for the conduct of lawful gambling.
Lessor records -The lessor must maintain a record of all
money received from the organization, and make the record
available to the Board and its agents, and the commissioners
of revenue and public safety and their agents upon demand.
The record must be maintained for 3 -1/2 years.
Rent all- inclusive - Amounts paid as rent by the organization
to the lessor are all- inclusive. No other services or expenses
provided or contracted by the lessor may be paid by the
organization, including but not limited to:
- trash removal - janitorial and cleaning services
- electricity, heat - other utilities or services
- snow removal - lawn services
- storage - security, security monitoring
- cost of any communication network or service required to
conduct electronic pull -tabs games or electronic bingo
- in the case of bar operations, cash shortages.
Any other expenditures made by an organization that is related
to a leased premises must be approved by the director of the
Gambling Control Board, Rent payments may not be made to
an individual.
I affirm that this lease is the total and only agreement between the lessor and the organization, and that all obligations and
agreements are contained in or attached to this lease and are subject to the approval of the director of the Gambling Control Board.
Other terms of the lease
All Items paid for by the Northwest Tonka Lions must be removeable upon termination of the lease.
re
of
Print nom nd title of le r
Print nabre- antrtitle of lessee
Stephani Boyum /Owner Roy Peterson CEO
Questions? Contact the Licensing Section, Gambling Control Board, at 651 -539 -1900. This publication will be made available in
alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. Data privacy notice: The information requested on this form and any
attachments will become public information when received by the Board, and will be used to determine your compliance with
Minnesota statutes and rules governing lawful gambling 3ctivl_07r,- ub.'�;3Lds,:"<V's,si'.;,_,;; r; r,.t:,',:_
rzri
z
M 4
im
z
rn
T I I
ykF ti A x'
70
W
a
s
n� 5
r
Y
cat
m
D
-C
-C �p
nit! C
F
I,ki,d,fi,m
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May S, 2014
TO: Mayor Hanus & City Council Members
FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Mana '
RE: Controlling private business on public lands and public waters
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364 -1687
YH: (852) 472 -0600
FAX: (952) 472 -0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
There has been some undesirable fallout that has resulted from public relations efforts promoting
Mound as a place to do business. The City has since experienced individuals doing business
from our parks, beaches and waters. Last summer at least two private business operators came
and went from Surfside Park and Beach and did business there, at will, on a daily basis (jet skiis
and stand -up boards). Their web sites list this location as their location of business. Another bay
became the testing area for a jet ski repair business.
Efforts were made by Orono Police Department and Hennepin County Sheriffs Department to
remove their presence but without success. Staff has been advised by Chief Correy Farniok that
Mound must have a policy that prohibits the unpermitted use of public parks, beaches and
waters, thus reserving those places for the use and enjoyment of general users.
The Staff Recommendation is to prohibit private business on all public lands and public waters,
to prevent a business operator from setting up a seasonal business of any kind utilizing City
infrastructure (i.e., a rack of kayaks at the greenway, rented from the end of the pier; an oil
change business in the parking deck, etc.)
This policy proposal is for all city property, infrastructure and waters, not just Surfside Beach
and Park, because Staff recognizes that these types of fly -by -night business operators will be
pushed to other City beaches, boat ramps and waters, or may even tether within shallow waters
to meet up with their customers.
The City Code amendment being recommended provides for individual consideration of
activities such as the Farmers' Market, when deemed suitable by the City Council.
-977-
printed on recycled pener
CITY OF MOUND
ORDINANCE NO. -2014
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 50 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT
RELATES TO PARKS AND RECREATION
The City of Mound does ordain:
Section 1. Article I of Chapter 50 of the Mound City Code is hereby amended to add the
following new sections:
Section 50 -1. Purpose and intent.
The City of Mound is entrusted by the public with the responsibility of managing the
public lands, public parks, public commons, public infrastructure, and public property
located in the City for the use and enjoyment of all persons. The City parks, green
spaces, beaches, waters, piers, trails, parking lots and other public facilities offer
opportunities for a broad range of public uses including gatherings, personal and group
recreational activities, concerts, picnics and peaceful meditation. The City is committed
to providing access and use of parks, green spaces, beaches, waters, piers, trails,
parking lots, and other public facilities in order to sustain the quality, accessibility, and
vitality of these spaces and facilities now and in the future. The City recognizes that the
commercial use of these public resources by private parties can be inconsistent and
against the interest of public, deplete public resources, and jeopardize the sustainability
of these public resources. In furtherance of this recognition, the City desires to prohibit
the sale or rental of goods, products, or services by private parties on property owned or
operated by the City when such goods, products, or services are delivered immediately
upon sale or rental by the private party selling or renting the good, product, or service
except when otherwise permitted by the City Code or the laws and regulations of the
State.
Sec. 50 -2. Prohibition.
Except as otherwise permitted by the City Code or the laws and regulations of the State,
the display, offer, or attempt to sell or rent goods, products, or services by private parties
is prohibited on property owned or operated by the City when such goods, products, or
services are delivered immediately upon sale or rental by the private party selling or
renting the good, product, or service.
Sec. 50 -3. Penalty.
Any person found in violation of Section 50 -2 shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
443597v2 MJM MU220 -2
Passed by the City Council this _ day of
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
Effective the day of
-979-
443597v2 MJM MU220 -2
2014
Mayor Mark Hanus
2014.
MINUTES
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 4, 2014
Vice Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Vice Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas
Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath (7:02), Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone, Pete Wiechert and
Mark Wegscheid. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Secretary
Jill Norlander.
Others present: Art & Barb King (2964 Pelican Pt Cir), Allison Sisk (6221 Westedge Blvd), Nick
Bellomy (6221 Westedge Blvd), Greg & Jory Covell (2637 Westedge Blvd), Madison Sisk (1035 W
Cove La), Jill Sisk (1035 W Cove La), Margie & Dan Saatzer (2625 Westedge Blvd)
APPROVE MEETING AGENDA
MOTION by Goode, second by Gawtry, to approve the agenda as presented. MOTION carried
unanimously.
APPROVE MEETING MINUTES FOR JANUARY 7T" AND 21ST 2014
MOTION by Goode, second by Penner, to approve the January 7, 2014 minutes. MOTION
carried unanimously.
MOTION by Gawtry, second by Bergquist, to approve the January 21, 2014 minutes. MOTION
carried unanimously.
BOARD OF APPEALS
Appeals Request — Keeping of Alpacas
6221 Westedge Boulevard Applicant: Allison Sisk
Smith introduced the request. The applicant is requesting that keeping of her four alpacas be
allowed as they are companion animals and similar to a pet dog. Her property consists of 2 lots
in the R -1 Residential District.
The keeping of alpacas is not listed as a permitted, conditional or accessory use in the R -1
zoning district. The keeping of alpacas is not allowed under the provisions contained in Sec. 14-
2 of the City Code. Staff finds the alpacas to be similar to animals commonly found on a farm,
such as cattle, horses, pigs, sheep or goats.
•:I
Smith indicated that staff received 2 letters of support. Ms. Sisk also provided a summary of
daily activities and other information on the care and keeping of alpacas.
Stone questioned the code listing animals "intended for slaughter ". Smith said that alpacas
aren't referenced specifically in the code.
Allison Sisk (6221 Westedge Blvd) gave background information. She said that her alpacas are
from 60 -80 pounds where her Great Dane is 160 pounds. Alpacas have no upper teeth and are
extremely gentle. She maintains that they are a benefit to the community — vet students visited
as part of their study. He has had them since November.
Smieja asked about typical weight. Sisk said 60 -150 pounds.
Retterath asked about noise. Sisk said they make a small hum noise. They are mostly outdoor
animals. Sisk answered several questions about the breed. Waste is confined to one very
small area for all four animals, was considerably less than anticipated and is valuable for
gardeners.
Retterath asked if they would be spooked by a passing vehicle. Sisk said they are very calm.
Wegscheid asked how the city became aware of the alpacas. Smith indicated that a report
came in from someone and Mike Wocken responded.
Marjorie Saatzer (2625 Westedge Blvd) said the alpacas are outside her kitchen window. The
dogs in the neighborhood are more of a nuisance. It's fun to have them. They like Mound
because it's unique.
Jory Covell (2637 Westedge Blvd) really loves having the alpacas in the neighborhood.
Retterath conjectured that the 1960 rule was established when Mound was growing and
becoming more dense. It's highly likely that the ordinance was written to allow those who had
animals at that time to continue.
Gawtry doesn't think it's a problem.
Retterath questioned whether other alpacas are bigger. Sisk replied that alpacas range from
60 -150 pounds. Her animals are on the smaller side. If they are allowed it would allow an
animal at about 150 pounds (no bigger than a Great Dane). Animal count would be another
thing.
Goode is not sure that more than 3 animals in households in Mound is really unusual.
Wiechert asked if alpacas were considered exotic. Sisk said no.
Smith stated that staff classifies alpacas as a farm animal. If it is deemed to be a companion
animal or a pet would require a code change.
Retterath asked where the line is between reasonable and excessive when it comes to animal
count.
Goode thought that Council should look at change in code to permit alpacas.
From this point a discussion about procedure ensued. The question: is it more similar to
livestock or closer to a companion animal (i.e. cat or dog)?
MOTION by Goode, second by Wiechert, to acknowledge that current code does not allow
alpacas in any zoning district and recommend the City Council consider changing the Code
regarding the keeping of alpacas because the commission believes they are more a companion
animal than livestock. MOTION carried unanimously.
Planning Case No. 13 -31 Modified Sketch /Concept Plan
2201 Centerview Lane Applicant: Art King
Smith introduced the applicant's plan to subdivide the 20,265 square foot property at 2201
Centerview Lane. The house is currently in conformance to lot of record requirements;
however, once the subdivision occurs all three lots will be subject to the R -2 lot standards for
new lots. The lot with the existing home will then have a nonconforming side yard setback on
the south of 6.9 feet.
Lot depth for proposed Lot 14 and 15 will need to be further evaluated by the surveyor and
staff. The garage and house on Lot 14 and 15 should also be moved so that a front yard setback
of 20 feet can be maintained.
Gawtry believes that all changes have been positive.
Art King (2964 Pelican Point) — Lot depth is up to interpretation. The surveyor could not tell him
if met 80 foot depth requirement. He was under the impression that the garage could be
turned and the required setback from the road would be less. The buildings can be moved to
accommodate the requirements. He wanted a little bigger backyard for the kids to play in.
Smith explained the side - loaded garage requirements.
Retterath demonstrated a measurement from the angle lot line along Noble to the rear and
easily came up with 80 feet to meet minimum.
Retterath supports the concept design. He also has no problem with the 6.9 foot setback but
would like to see a slightly larger garage.
OLD /NEW BUSINESS
Election of Chair and Vice Chair for 2014
MOTION by Wegscheid, second by Stone to appoint Cindy Penner as Chair and David Goode as
Vice Chair. MOTION carried unanimously.
Staff Update / Council Liaison Report
Smith
• Enjoyable volunteer dinner
• Schedule training for Stone and Smieja
• PH for the CUP next CC for Cattails
• Evaluate expansion permit regulations
• Chickens & bees went to the CC last week. Council did not wish to change bee
regulations (off premise concerns) but directed staff to evaluate chicken regulations and
how it applies to Mound in real life. They asked staff to contact other communities that
have allowed chickens for several years and their experience with them.
TIF District legislation request to extend our district is in the works
Gawtry requests staff look into the Free Church electronic sign; blinking, spinning, distracting.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION by Penner, second by Gawtry, to adjourn at 8:34 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously.
Submitted by Jill Norlander
•.
Vint � M 1•
Fire Commission Meeting
Wednesday May 7, 2014
11:00 a.m. — 1:00 p.m.
1. General Information and Updates
• 2013 Department Annual Report
• 2013 Department Highlights and HOT TOPICS Review
• 2013/14 Department Accomplishments
2. Hot Topics and Fire Chiefs 2014 Priority Projects
• Insurance Services Office Public Protection Class Audit — April 15, 2014
• Fire Service and Fire Department NEWS
• Our Staffing Plan - Recruiting, Hiring, and Retention of Volunteer Firefighters
• Update: Changing MFD Response Protocols and Duty Officer Program
3. Financial and Budgets
• 2013 Budget vs. Expenditures, Fire Fund Balance, Apparatus Replacement Fund
• 2014 Capital Improvement Plan, Apparatus and Equipment Purchases
• MVFD Relief Association Pension Plan Actuarial Valuation as of 12/31/13
• New Supplemental State Aid Program Overview
• MFD Grant Awards and Tracking - Overview
• Apparatus Replacement Needs - CIP
4. Other NEWS and Follow up
• Fire Code Compliance and Forms
• West Hennepin (Lakes Area) Fire Group
• MVFD Relief Assn. Fish Fry and Dance 2014 June 7, 2014
5. Adjourn
f
Mound Fire
l
Department
63'dAnnual Fish Fry and Dance
Tickets: $10.00 Advance
$12.00 at the Door
Dance to Big /' and the JamE
1. Strategic Plan is important — like any business, and I (we) have been working it
• People, Apparatus, Equipment, Facilities
• Succession Planning underway, with promotions, hiring, training
2. Staffing is the Strategic Plan #1 Priority
• - Recruiting and Retention of firefighters (Hired 6 new firefighters as of March 4 2014)
• Staff time management for volunteers (Duty Officer Program Starts April 6, -2014)
3. Administrative and Organizational changes in 2013 (done and ongoing)
• Reorganization of Administration and Operations
• Blue Card CTC, probationary firefighters, staff training
• Accomplishments for MFD in 2013/2014
4. MFD Budgets have been tight with minimal $$ increases (frugality) for years
Budget Challenges list continues to grow, but close $$ management critical
0 2014 Budget Increase 1.82%
. 4 year budget increase 11.35 % average
0 Overview and History of Grant Requests (and grant request. philosophy)
CIP— Apparatus and Replacement of 1980 Sutphen Aerial Ladder Truck
6 Fire State Aid - Supplemental Aid for 2013
s Pension Plan Changes and Actuarial Valuation 12/31/2013 results
5. MFD Accomplishments that happened in 2013/2014
® St. Bonifacius Fire and City Automatic Aid
• insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection Class Audit;(WIP)
• Refer to List in Annual Report
M.M.
i+e
� M
O
N
C N
0 � E
Ce V
d
7
y
@
N
'I
r
W
W
O
N
M O
n
Y9 a
3 0
1
r
�r
W
u,
O
q �-
NM
V
Nlpr
W
AO�N
M<N
W
r W
W OWN
r N
N N
N
M
V
N
Ntpr
N N
N
W
N
W
N M
0�-!�
M
W
at
O
N
N
{LLk
N
0
� N
W
A N
N
N
b
N
N
M
W
N
Q<
N
N
M
W
N
N
N
N
C
b
S
LL
iy
N
NNNN
N
M
M
W
41-
ANN
N
N
O N.O
M
r
NN
NN
O
M
p
W
N-7
W
r
N�
-NNNg
D
.r
N
:N
n
d
-
C
0
n
)
U
C
o
Z
=
0
o
d
d
d
NNm
N
N
L
W
v
f
2
W
�¢>
d
10
aai
m
>o
Z
c
aai
m
e
LL
T3
o
°`f..'.q..
w
:w
o
°>>mn
La
>m�md..Nm
a
Y
avaNN
W
mLL
yLLyLL
c
>.C_
Oa
j
d
cSLL...LL
y
IOyL
cLL
W
LLL
LL
dLL
mILLL
N
2
�.
.;
N
h'
UCE
cdmwo
y�m
LL.O
omEct°�c
.j
'�C�
iCXT(Y
pro
cc
HY
oE>
n
SfappOgYf.
cc�'
m>
W
W
c
LL
n
W
W.d
`
W
O
_m o
W
c
W
n
y
W
W..
cn
mW
m
Q
UaU
N
_
:yn
f%
LLmry..rQ
Fr
a
c�
N.12
i
d
L
e
L
>
o d d
G
U
G
O c
m
c D
c
m
L >S :
LL
o
Ti
Em
_
.q
_U
i9
n2
ya
�
22
�
n
2"a
n
7a
M
=EY2
'.
rT>i
E
Q
En
€
r
Q
Un
p
d
m
a
L
'nom
L¢
>ql0
>E
d
€ €°'
d@
2
CL
LL
LL
LL
E
Y.
LL
LL
W
LL
ILL
LL
LL
Q Q
LL
i-y
LL
�
Y.:
tl
LL
IL
W
V
d
N
.N
2
d
d
v
2
2
d
E
L
W
W W
Ld L
LL
IW L
{L
LL�1 'it
ll
la.LL
LL
ILLLLLL
LLli
t!LLLL
LLIL
lL I1Y
IL
LL
lL{LLL
iL
U
LL
K
N
y
mg
c
tl
a
m
o
0
E
O
H5
m
_W
m
aa,
Q
m
m
>
n
m
m
'O
U
so
LL¢
LL
d
a3i
d
E
aLL
w
d
d
c
d
E
dMO
Ea
Eat
mLa
d
Oaa
=�
and
C
E
q
=
o
E>
q
a
E
d
t
>d
?�
E
q
d
EE
U
-oU
E
Y
and
ga
d
d
nod
m
n
C_
�
g
m
q
c
m
c
ry
c
0
yv�
y
GN
W
00.0
`UU
ONSN(n�OYJOrOON
p
LUU
p
N-_I
~N
Cf
N(D
W
NNtDNNN..
W
V
N
N
O
W
O
W
N
W:
p
00
p
O
O
V
r
�NO.N
W
m
W
W
mNN
W
M
QN
<
"'Rom
N
Vt
N
N
N
�
m
q
q
q
q
q
q
'�
q'.q
Y'�
`m
'�
d
t5`5
ca'
m
Yl
=5
m
m
jr
a
C
a
c
yq,
n
c.c
b`
m
a
a
c
a-
c'-
a
c
Ca$b
m
N
r
a
c
m
aag'a
q
a
c
a
r
m
a-g
m
a
c
Uc
d
d
c
'5
N
>
N
cC.E
U�
d
>
2
>
>
>
d:N
cc
=
C C
>
C"2
>
>
o Y
J
_.
:Egfr
NN
(n
a)
.'C.
.c0.m
c
c
f
a
MM
N
N
M
N
Mly`{.M
O
O
O
N
N
MMMf7�Y�ty'
O
N
O
O O
N O
M(hM
N
MME^
t�IMMMI�m
N��( p�3$V`1
M
I-
OmN��OaVN
�OV
RHN����
�NNNMCJMC3
N_N
N�[1
N�D�
maOm
Oi.�
00-
mNNNN
"'N`.('F
�T
I�
t�t�p
ul
K QNCWJ
Z
pp.
NN
W
W
V
N
W <� G ^'S�
m
@
<� V bNNlulj
NKNi
N
N
987
A fire protection area needs a ladder /service company for each ladder /service location
credited under Section 560, Deployment Analysis.
Also, a fire protection area needs a ladder /service company in an existing fire station
when that station serves 50% or more of a standard response district not within 2'/ road
miles of other ladder /service companies. A standard response district is a built -upon
area with a creditable water supply (as defined in Section 201A3) within a response
distance of 2'/z road miles.
The additional needed ladder /service locations must be fire stations identified as needed
in Section 510A.
As an alternative to determining the number of needed ladder /service companies
through the road -mile analysis used in Section 560, the authority having jurisdiction may
provide the results of a systematic performance evaluation. Such an evaluation analyzes
computer -aided dispatch (CAD) history to demonstrate that, with its current deployment
of companies, each fire department meets the time constraints for initial full -alarm
assignment in accordance with the general criteria of NFPA 1710, Standard for the
Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical
Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments.
A. NUMBER OF NEEDED LADDER COMPANIES;(NL):
Individual ladder /service response areas with at least 5 buildings of 3 stories or 32 feet
or more in height (ground to eaves) or with at least 5 buildings that have a Needed Fire
Flow greater than 3,500 gpm or with at least 5 buildings meeting any combination of
those criteria must have a ladder company.
When no individual response area needs a ladder company, the fire protection area
needs at least 1 ladder company if buildings in the fire protection area meet the criteria
above.
B. NUMBER OF NEEDED SERVICE COMPANIES (NS):
Ladder /service response areas not needing a ladder company according to Section
540A must have a service company.
541 NUMBER OF EXISTING LADDER /SERVICE COMPANIES (EL/SC):
A. NUMBER OF EXISTING LADDER COMPANIES (EL):
For a company serving in the capacity of a ladder company, on the initial alarm to all
reported structure fires, and equipped according to NFPA 1901, Standard for Automotive
Fire Apparatus, give credit as an existing ladder company if a ladder company is needed
according to Section 540A.
For an apparatus serving in the capacity of a ladder company, equipped according to
NFPA 1901, and considered as an existing engine company in Section 511, give 50%
credit as a ladder company (engine - ladder) in this section if a ladder company is needed
according to Section 540A.
© Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 30
Equipment "
Needed
Credit/Unit
Total Points
SCBA (30- minute minimum)
4
24
96
Extra cylinders (carried)
4
6
24
Salvage covers (minimum size of 12'x 14')
6
2
12
Electric generator (3,000 watt)
1
25
25
Portable floodlight (500 watt)
3
4
12
Smoke ejector (5,000 cfm)
1
20
20
Portable thermal cutting unit
1
20
20
Saw — power (chain or heavy -duty rotary type)
1
20
20
Electric handlights
4
2
8
Pike pole (plaster hook):
3' or 4'
2
2
4
6' or longer
4
2
8
Radio:
Mounted
1
32
32
Portable
1
16
16
Ladder:
24' extension or longer
1
25
25
16' roof or longer
1
25
25
10' attic or longer
1
4
4
14' combination or longer
1
5
5
Total
35R
*Of sufficient height to reach the roof of any building, or 100 feet, whichever is less. The credit shall be
prorated if existing equipment has insufficient reach.
© Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 44
-989-
Points
Needed__.Credit/Unit
_Total Points ___
Ladder:
16' or longer roof
1
25
25
35' or longer extension
1
25
25
Elevated stream device*
1
100
100
Large spray nozzle (1,000 gpm)
1
16
16
Aerial ladder /elevating plafform*
1
200
200
Annual tests (aerial /platform, see Table 542C)
1
50
50
Total
416
*Of sufficient height to reach the roof of any building, or 100 feet, whichever is less. The credit shall be
prorated if existing equipment has insufficient reach.
© Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012 Page 44
-989-
;H
`0
3
O
O
V
0
N
N
M
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
CYr
N
Ri
N
C4
N
L'l-I
N
Ri
N
0..
N
N
N
U
U
0
CIS
x
x
cd
in.
91.
o
b
db�b"Cl
^c$7:17S"dbbbbbvbbIC)
00
o
0
0
00
0
0.00
0
0
0
0.0
0
0
0
0
0
Cj
vl
n
cn
cn
H
U
G
u
U
O
'a�
Y
CL
CL
A,
ti
O
cd
rL
O
U
y
O
as
N
.•
cd
U
U
ti
>,
>,
d��d
°
b0'.•�
vi
.}a
W
�
•..
b
Y
�
,-+
VJ
x
F-I
F
Y
(�U-1�
Md
�QyJ
N
A
A
�
Q
U
U
o
w
d
S
o
o
o.
Qn
.V
a
a
a
-on
3
3>>
°
°
°°
U
°
w
Q
3.
0
>>
G
•�
v
v
°O
a
n
n
°otn
3
3
ro
N
cd
N
M
•^�
•�
{�.�
Cry
1C$
•"'
fd
F{RV$
.�'
/.f/d�
RS
�.+
u
r
1✓ �
/-1
(,[
L-'
a
Yil
U
U
W
a
CV
W
O
a
a
W
C5
L
Fa
Vi
V
VX
b
b
b >
b
b
b
b
b
b
H
H
}'
(�
N
H
i°+
iU,
lUi
O
.L'"
°
N
iii
sU-i
IUi
Y-r
tU+
H
?;
.�
b
•o
.o
Q°
g
3
3
El
.o
A
UUUUUUU
cc
9'
60)Z
lulu
UU
cn
..wC7.CJa.a�'OO��C/)i.H.
v1
O
O
N
�O
h
0
O
0
0
00
oo
r+
�
h
_
0
cn
N
O
O
cD
.-+
.--i
O
N
N
O
O
O
O
d'
oo
O
N
N
O
N
N
r1l
M
N
\O
N�
M
M
�
N
V
00
N�
00
N
M
N
<Y
N
N
N
(t
N
V1
N
N
Vl
�O
Vl
�O
cn
c0 l�
V1 cn
M
Vl
—+
N
N
O
vl
O
v�
O
v1
V
cn
�
aan_
0
'c
E
Yfici
0 0 0
C/� CIO V]
V IT M
a
Z
O
_c
E
m
.i
O
W
O
u
C
ro
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
U
V
.54
a4
18
X.
^�.
`�
.^L
1i
^�
k'
^may'
`�4
`.�
.k
.y.
.^1.
X.
N
cHd
c�
�
cc
cHC
4y.
cHd
c�
cHd
cHd
cHd
cHd
N
cHC
a
a,
a
a.
a
a
a
o.,
P.
a.
P.
P.
P.
P.
a
a l
a
b
•O
'Li
b
b
b
b
b
bU
OD
Oc
bD
bD
a
bD
bA
t>p
ttc
tc
m
m
bD
u
u
u
LJ
C
c7
O
F�'
G
C
=
=
C,.,.
dti
O
O
O
O
O
r:
rO
/.
V�
V]
Vi
UO
I �n
Uo
I cn
I VJ
I V)
cn
I UJ
cn
V]
cl�
I cl�
I V]
V]
Y
Y
YY!
Y
W
�
un
W
s0.
w
a,
w
1.
Es
Q
=
VI
v]
U
0
cD
y
cn
cn
cn
O
O
O
O
T.1i
OCd
O
H
M
0
m
�.
C
rby
((O
A
.n
0
^M
^M
^cl
it
SC
�
vt
x
0
0
0
0°
0
0
0
Ol
..1
O
O
O
O
O
o
Y
¢,
Y
¢,
'�
W
'i7
s•+
„
x.3...0..
Xi
-4
-g1
xt
O
O
M
O
b
b
b
b
b
b
n
n
b
b
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q 5�I
S Q r
W
W
W
W
N
N
N
N
g
oN
N
N
"b
"O
'b
N
•N
'N
V
GJ
4J
N
N
N
N
N
N
V
y
rA
N
N
Gi
Fir
Ci
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
y,,
h
.y
.y
.=
0
O
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
o 0
0
o O
O
8 o
y
U]
U]
V2
V]
V1
V]
U]
V]
V]
U]
V]
V]
C/)
L.
Vl
Vt
vt
Vl
'O
ID
et
7 ti'
V
V
7
7
7
7 It
d'
it
t
d'
141
991-
Yfici
0 0 0
C/� CIO V]
V IT M
a
Z
O
_c
E
m
#
�
�
? Ln 9 $ q q q q \ ®
� - - - -- -.�. .�.......
-
&95-
«
�
I
q
Is
R�
q'
o �
C
U.
N
:Q
[Z
d
U
o
o
a
o
o
(b
0Op
r
O
O
o
v
�
O
((0
O
O
�
m
N
V
N
O
d
00
cvj
O
O
Q
O
O
O
O
r
N
r
W
W0)
(6
O
O
O
O
O
C)
r
c'7
M
Cl)
LID
e
N
r
d
u
c
0
c
10
co
o
r
o
o
O
v
m
M
so
0
o
c
a
o
r>
r.
o
rn
P
o
m
w
O
v
Q
!u
c
°
0
r
°
h
ai
0
°
C
W
L)
O
0)
r
0
O
aMi
O
®
M
M
b
O
U
d
p
R)
@@.
'V
co
co
>
V
Vl
V3
V3
VD
Vi
V!
Vi
V!
Vb
44.
609
N
V)
O
®.
r
O
C9
d
r
O
W
�
P
�
m
W
W
co 0
w
Q
�
�
p®
Un
r
m
1
P
n
to
.t
°r?
Z
v
Q
m
o
cv
cv
cl
ui
m
<f
C%
t
P
cY
M
r
Or
w
LU
co
M
�
CD
O
r
O
tB
w
r
Nr
r
r
t-
63
V}
V3
VF
Vi
H
V}
w
V9
dt
4a
N
Vt
w
Cq
z
CL
tz
M
2
Itd
0
m
w
LU
z
IL
w
w
_
LL
m
W
w
Fp
°Q
o
00
0
0
0
°o,
°o
U
o
0
00
.�
W
Q
Q
O
O
LO
m
❑
Om
O
N
co
000
h
W
®
m
to
P
cli
co
co
10
In
N
M
W
G
�]
M
�
co
Cl)
01
r
®
O co
(Oy
£
M
N
M
V
V3,
613
613
V3
46
613
V!
S
N
N
VD
N
N
9
C
-
d
,b
o
w
a
Co
M N
0!
O
u
>
o
N
w
N N
d
0)
U
G
00
`w
Q
co
C
C
C w
C
C
C
Q
j
V
m
49
cc
O
0
U
=
01
a U
7
O
h-
N
M
w
F
Cl)
c)
co
C
rM
o
C
O•
0
co
t3
O
m
W
u K
cr
a w
7
us
0) O
0-0
0
0
r
"�
—996-
P C
s O
O
LL
U 0.
i
6
Z m
y
ty A
L a
>- a`
t
LLI
LU
0 •'
FE
a a a
6 0 0 0
r A T T
O O) N N
O O O O
N O W m
O O O O
N N N N
m
U
G
N
C
LL
N
tD
tD
V m
o a
N d
N Q
12
Q LL
d d
m E
o
`E
o E
N �
a
o U
O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
fJ
C1
16
N
M
V
O
O
tU
N
Ih
L U
N
— I r
O
p
O
O
p
0
.08000
O
O
N
0
0
0
0
0
000
sj
r
¢
d
f
P
r
O
N
N
H
O
Z Z
.
tab
w
pN
7 W W
b
a
N
tF
m
d
C
N
E
NI
N
n
O
N
R
f9
m
Oy
N
(A
N
N
N
L"
C
C
N
o
O
to
.Sv_
y
O
M
O
pNp�
C
M
r
!n
.-
N
r
tW
E
S
N
�
Os/
A
N
P•
l7
n
U
C
O
O
O
O
R
dO
O
O
r
N
Of
N
O
O
N
OI
O
p
M
c0
NB
d
a
O N
N
N
f9
l7
N
N
r
C
d
O
Q
C
role
d
m
o
N
d
>< r
N
N
OO
'O
u
E
OI
N
r
6 N
rA
tMn
N
N
t°o
NN
7 E
CL
m C
{�
E
r
O
<
N
O
c
10 E
`
D9 O
N
Oi
r
tf!
d
Ot
v
C N
N
N
tl
V
NO
O
6 !ti b ® W
Q a F- N
OS
C
V NI
oi
M
ai
C°
G
LL LL LL
d'
U
L
d
d
N
�
S
0
� a
a
y
".Y
o
W
6
Q
co
v O WFL
p
Le
s
®
a
0
R
U
a
$'m
z r w U
o
ma• Udaa�
E
»
av
d
�E
may.
e
c
(~.1
d
N
O
Y
R
d
a
T
fA
K
w
IL
w
°w
m
E
r
E
E
m
Y
Y
o c>
w
997
F-
a
w
V
2
x
s
W
o
w& u x
w
�
r
N
M
�
N
10
P:
OB
fi O 6 0 0
G
6.
(s �
m
U
G
N
C
LL
N
tD
tD
V m
o a
N d
N Q
12
Q LL
d d
m E
o
`E
o E
N �
a
o U
S
E
E
N
@
LL
d
p>
Q
i
W
E
n
m
0
m
M
m
II
d
Lo
C
"w
C
a
E
N 6
N li
O m
a 9
M m
n z
II FEF
M 5
@ m
N
C
A
@ IL
a
ym
o?
0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
O O
0 0
O Or
mN
m
`
m
O O
r
r (
W
M
W m
0 W
O r
m P
.
..
m W
N m
m m
r O
O m
M1 �'
m Q
Q P
WOO
N N
N N
e a���
mm
, nmrN.
yd
W
m
'm m�NrOO
m r
m W
W
m W
m N
m h'm
m
m m
m W
NOON
m m
tv
Oi
N
a
a
a
C
LL
O
O
O O
O O
.000
O O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
C
Q
O m
m m
O m
m M1
OO
tl
r
vv
r
N m
P r
N
m M
M W
M N
m r
M P
m P
W W
e^
m d
C_ 2
Y
� a
N
N N
N N
N
N N
N N
N N
N N
M N
N19
N N
N
S
a
...
o
0 .
0
og0000000000000000
0
0 0
0 0
o o
o 0
o 0
0 0
0 0
0
Z C
m'
N
W O
m
m Q
ON
m r
r m
r O
W m
P r
O1
O
m
m
O O
c'
m m
M1 W
m O
W m
m N
O m
r V
m
LL
M
m O
m m
N
ON
m P
6-1
m m
m m
Cl
yd
mmm
QrWMhmmrQrorrromW
a s
r
NN
N
N
N N
N m
M M
Q M
m P
Q P
O
m
N
N N
N m
N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
tl! N
N N
N
00 000
00000000000000000
OO000000000000000
.98
O
@
m
r
Q O
m
r
Q
P
O
r n
m
M N
m
J
ONi
Mn�(mpmmMUmi
umic.6
N60
om<N
m
6
m
J0016
V.N
NNNNNN
00000
0 0
000000
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0000000000000000000000b0000
0 0
0 0
Oo
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
OO
0000000000
000000
.G
a
0 0
O
O O
O N
h m
N O
O
O O
O O
O O
m N
m -i,6
m
O O
O
O O
m m
m m
N m
m m
m m
N N
N m
m m
O
N N
N N
m M
M M
m P
Q P
Q Q
N
N m
m m
m N
m m
m m
m m
m m
m m
N m
m%
m m
m O
m m
Coco
m m
m m
d
m
N
N
C
O
b
C
a
LLNN
NN
NNN
--
NNNm
NNNmNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNwNU
ImNNmN
O O
O OO
O
O OO
O
O
O O
000.00
O
o O
0
o
O O
O
isr
o
cco0oo
oQ
00
or
oNr
0O
0NN
0N
0n
00O
01m � 0mr
0M 0M
oO 0m
o
om
h
lo
mm mm
p
mmaom
Q
rm
M W
O
N
O
(O
NO
r
m
r m
m0m !0Q'm
M
W CO
lm r
N 7
m O
N 0
O
O N
m
a
N
M h
n M
M
r m
m m
N
m
r M
m n
M O
m m
m P
m O
O`
r
m m
r
O W
N N
m N
Q m
r
m
N O
m h
W M
r W
m m
m m
N N
m m
N
W m
N
m r
m O
N
d
N N
N N
N O
N M
Q
N N
N
N
N N
N
@ p
F~p-U
N N
N N
N M
N N
N N
N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
c
o 0
0 0
O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0
O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0
O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 r
O N
m 0
m O
p
S
O O
P O
e- m
O
M N
Q m
O
O O
W m
m O
y m
P W
Q
r
m r
P N
O Q
N W
r W
m r
Q r
N Q
m IA
N M
r m
Q m
m N
O r
N
r
m m
N W
r m
m r
t7 m
t7 M
m Q
m m
O W
M
m y
lV m
M m
m m
M W
d
m O
P r
M m
m m
N<
m
N O
m r
m m
O O
r r
tq m
r Q
n
r r
N m
m m
O M
M1 n
w
r
r m
N M
f0 m
r M
m m
W
r. P
m N
Q m
m 6m
N
m m
Q M
m
Q
m
m m
m m
M P
n m
m O
O P
m m
O r
N m
O m
m m
r M1
Q M
n n
'46
O O
C
r
N N
NM
N
M M
m P
Q P
Q Q
Q Q
P Q
m
r r
r r
r
O
U
e
N
m m
m M
N N
N N
N NIH
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N
M Nf9
N
N M
N N
N N
m N
N N
N H
C
O O
O O
O O
0
O O
O
O.O
Oo
.N0
O
O
O O
o 0
O O
0 o
O O
O O
O 0000000000000
o 0
0 0
O o
O o
O
O O
o
o O
O O
O O
O
o O
O
O a
O
o
p j
(9 O
Q r
4r7 W
m NO
m
a
m
m
o
0 M
mM
m
MQmmmNm
m
O
m m
yy O
mr
M
O
m O
O m
m
O
rN
O O
mmmmmmmo
O O
0
m
N
0 0 0 0
W
M
M
m
Q
m
m
m n
O
m
r m
m m
N
m
�l
W
O
N
YfrV J W
M r m
{
r
M QrO
r Q
m 1�O
(1
C
"
N
r
�rO -
rNO rNe
-
r
r
r
O
U
c
0
a
a�ac m
NO NO
n
NO *O
wm No
NQN
Nr
NN
N0
Nm NO
Nm
NP
Nr VN i•
N wm
Nm NM
Nr NO
Nm Nm
NO
NO
NrO NrO
NO
Vr�-S•
w NNNNNNN
m0
O
O O
O O
O O
M O
m
O
m
O O
0 O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O.O
O 00,
O O
O O
m m
O
m
O O
m m
O O
O m
O O
m m
O O
m O
O O
O O
O m
m n
O O
O O
O
O
ym
Mmm
mM
m In
m m
m
m m
m m
m mm
m
m m
m m
m m
m
m m
r r
O
N-
NNNINNNN(9
WHfNNNNNNNNNNNNN(9N
NfRNNNNNNHI
d
-
----
.0
ao
.0
00
0 0
00000000
0 0
0 0
0 0
000.000000.
00000000000000000
O
00.00
a
O O
mm
ON
m0
0 0
MMm000mm
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
NNmNmrm
0
0 0
00.6
O O
omM
O M
MMmmmr
Q m
lV M
r
3
W O
mm
P N
N O
m N
r M
M
N
m m
m P
Q PM
mM1
M
Q m
r O
N
®
n O
O N
PN
M
Q
W
Q m
r P
O m
m
o
O
m r
m m
Q r
W n
W n
m m
m m
m
�
r r
N N
N N
N N
N N
m
p
d
N(9
mN
NNNNNNNm
f9.
m
W
W o
rn o
�NNNNNNNmNNNN
r N
0 0
m Q
m m
r m
m o
m
r N
m m
M
m
Q m
m m
m n
m m
m m
m m
a
rn m
N M
m rn
m
W
m r
W W
m 0 Q
Q
m
n
m 0
0
W o N
r m M1 m
r rn r m
h m r rn
r m m
m W
m
m W
rn W
m m
W W
W W
m rn
m m
m
m .- o N
0 N 0
N
0
N N
N N
N N
N N
0
N N
0 0
N N
0
N N
N N
0 0
N N
E
n
m
0
m
M
m
II
d
Lo
C
"w
C
a
E
N 6
N li
O m
a 9
M m
n z
II FEF
M 5
@ m
N
C
A
@ IL
a
ym
o?
Mound Fire - 40 Year Financial Summary
Year
Operating Budget
Hourly gage
Pension Contribution
2% Contribution
Pension Benefit
1973
$ 3.50
$ 9,743.00
$ 11,514.00
$ 70.00
1974
$ 150
$ 7,410.00
$ 15,090.00
$ 70.00
1975
$ 3.50
$ 10,589.00
$ 12,443.00
$ 70.00
1976
$ 3.50
$ 13 419.00
$ 13,782.00
$ 120.00
1977
$ 3.50
$ 13,158.00
$ 16,300.00
$ 120.00
1978
$ 3.50
$ 20,808.00
$ 18,901.00
$ 145.00
1979
$ 3.50
$ 25,421.00
$ 21,689.00
$ 145.00
1980
$ 5.10
$ 9,780.00
$ 23,906.00
$ 185.00
1981
$ 107 950.00
$ 5.43
$ 41,271.00
$ 26,244.00
$ 185.00
1982
$ 120,050.00
$ 5.80
$ 32,880.00
$ 35,495.00
$ 210.00
1983
$ 5.80
$ 33 000.00
$ 29,974.00
$
210.00
1984
$ 6.00
$ 36,300.00
$ 31,249.00
$
240.00
1985
$ 134,650.00
$ 6.00
$ 39,930.00
$ 34,021.00
$
250.00
1986
$ 142 802.00
$ 6.00
1
$ 43,923.00
$ 39,620.00
$
290.00
1987
$ 6.00
$ 48,325.00
$ 42,194.00
$ 290.00
1988
$ 221,430.00
$ 6.00
$ 53147.00
$ 44,857.00
$ 350.00
1989
$ 229,230.00
$ 6.00
$ 58 462.00
$ 45,818.00
$ 350.00
1990
$ 234 290.00
$ 6.00
1
$ 64,308.00
$ 46,024.00
$ 395.00
1991
$ 256,000.00
$ 6.00
1
$ 66,880.00
$ 46 041.00
$ 395.00
1992
$ 251,600.00
$ 6.00
1
$ 69,556.00
$ 45,725.00
$ 395.00
1993
$ 274,200.00
$ 6.00
$
73,338.00
$ 42,738.00
$ 425.00
1994
$ 270,190.00
$ 6.00
1 $
75,231.00
$ 45,541.00
$ 425.00
1995
$ 285,330.00
$ 6.00
1 $
80,500.00
$ 48,685.00
$ 425.00
1996
$ 6.50
1 $
85,394.00
$ 64,108.00
$ 460.00
1997
$ 335,320.00
$ 6.50
$
88 810.00
$ 63,412.00
$ 460.00
1998
$ 360,220.00
$ 6.50
$
92,360.00
$ 64 712.00
$ 510.00
1999
$ 409,680.00
$ 6.50
1 $
96,050.00
$ 66,128.00
$ 510.00
2000
$ 411,520.00
$ 6.50 1
$
101,810.00
$ 68,798.00
$ 510.00
2001
$ 415,850.00
$ 7.00
$
105,880.00
$ 73,287.00
$ 585.00
2002
$ 439,470.00
$ 7.50
$
109,060.00
$ 84,816.00
$ 585.00
2003
$ 464,460.00
$ 7.50
$
112,340.00
$
106,83100
$ 585.00
2004
$ 451,410.00
$ 7.50
$
115,700.00
$
140,838.00
$ 585.00
2005
$ 479,300.00
$ 7.50
$
118,600.00
$
108,098.00
$ 585.00
2006
$ 507,930.00
$ 8.00
$
122,160.00
$
116,354.00
$ 585.00
2007
$ 539,730.00
$ 8.00
$
125,830.00
$
102,730.00
$ 585.00
2008
$ 587,33100
$ 8.00
$
129,600.00
$
86,739.00
$ - 585.00
2009
$ 613,434.00
$ 8.50
$ 133,500.00
$
75,889.00
$ 585.00
2010
$ 613,658.00
$ 8.75
$ 137,500.00
$
78,104.00
$ 585.00
2011
$ 615,792.00
$ 9.00
$ 141,625.00
$
74,362.00
$ 585.00
2012
$ 635,063.00
$ 9.00
$ 143,625.00
$
73,686.21
$ 605.00
2013
$ 628,211.00
$ 9.00
$ 155,800.00
$
96,000.00
$ 605.00
2014
$ 158,100.00
$
99,800.00
$ 605.00
2015
$ 160,500.00
$
103,800.00
$ 605.00
2016
$ 162,900.00
$
108,000.00
$ 605.00
2017
$ 165,300.00
$
112 000.00
2018
$ 167,800.00
$
116,800.00
2019
$ 170,300.00
$
121,400.00
2020
$ 172,900.00
$
126,000.00
Pay Increase = 243% Or 2 1/2 times Pension Increase = 835% or 8 112 times
MFD 40 Year Financial Summary - Budget Financial
-999 -
7/2/2013
F
a
w
U
Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works & Transit
H 701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400 612- 348 -9260, Phone
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 612 - 348 -9710, Fax
www.hennepin.us
Ms. Kandis Hanson
City Manager
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
Subject: Fiscal Year 2015 — 2017 Joint Cooperation Agreement/Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Program
Dear Ms. Hanson:
Thank you for your City's participation in the Urban Hennepin County Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program (Urban County CDBG Program). As you know,
Hennepin County is the lead agency for the Urban County CDBG Program, which consists of
Hennepin County (County) and 39 suburban communities. The U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) requires a Joint Cooperation Agreement (Agreement), which is
renewed every three years, in order for the County to qualify as an urban county and receive
CDBG entitlement funds on behalf of participating cities.
The existing Joint Cooperation Agreement (FY 2012 — 2014) between the County and your City
is due to expire September 30, 2014. It contains an automatic renewal clause in Section III that
reads: "Prior to the end of the initial term and the end of each subsequent qualification period,
the COUNTY, as the lead agency of the URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM, shall provide written notice to the
COOPERATING UNIT of their right not to participate in a subsequent qualification period."
This letter serves as notification that the current Agreement will automatically renew for another
three -year period unless the City notifies both HUD and the County in writing by June 1, 2014
of its intent to terminate the Agreement as of the end of the current qualification period. Under
the terms of the Agreement, to remain a participating City in the Urban County CDBG
Program, there is nothing more you need to do.
By continuing to participate in the Urban County CDBG Program, your City is eligible to receive
CDBG funds under the terms of the agreement and will automatically be included in the HOME
Investment Partnership (HOME) and Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) programs administered
by the County. The City will not be eligible to apply for grants under the State CDBG Program.
1001-
An Equal Oppartuniry Employer Recycied Paper
Ms. Hanson
April 18, 2014
Page 2
The Urban County CD
participation g na this program has
aprogran' history
as helped t bring mill ons of tax dollars back to
partnership. The Urban County CDBG Program has
your community and suburb Hennepin County.
helped thousands of seniors and lower- income families Public hlities, neighborhood ervices that
maintain/foster independenchousing
affordablle housing.
improvements, youth programs,
If you are considering opting out, the County
Your partnership is very important to the County.
would appreciate the opportunity to meet before an opt -out letter is sent.
Please contact me at (612) 543 -1965 if you have any questions about the Agreement or auto -
renewal process. I look forward to continuing our cooperative efforts in addressing suburban
Hennepin County housing and community development needs.
Sincerely,
Margo Geffen
Manager, Housing Development and Finance
Please direct election letter for the County to:
Margo Geffen
Manager, Housing Development and Finance
Hennepin County Housing, Community Works and Transit
701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Please direct election letter for HUD to:
Ben Osborn
CPD Representative
Minneapolis Field Office
920 Second Avenue South, Suite 1300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
cc: Abby Shafer, Hennepin County
-1002-
Kandis Hanson
Subject: FW: Explorers
From: Correy Farniok [mailto:CFarniokCabci orono mn us]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 11:48 AM
To: Chris Fischer; Cynthia Bremer; Cynthia Bremer ( cynthia bremer(&ogletreedeakins com); Dan Tolsma; Heidi Gesch;
Jaci Lindstrom; Jessica Loftus; Jessica Werder; JoAnne Anderson (Mayor Minnetonka Beach); Kandis Hanson; Lili
McMillan; Mayor Mark Hanus; Ron Olson; Sarah Reinhardt; Shirley Bren; Susanne Griffin
Subject: FW: Explorers
On Saturday I had the great pleasure to drive to Rochester and attend the awards banquet for the Minnesota Law
Enforcement Explorers Conference.
Our department sent down 7 police explorers and 3 advisors (Police officers).
This was an awesome experience. I saw the excitement in their eyes and faces as I walked toward them as they were
lined up in the hall. It only got better as the night progressed. The seven individuals that represented Orono PD did an
outstanding job.
The first award won was by Ben Wenande. Ben won the Shawn Silvera Memorial Award. This award is awarded
annually to the police explorer who best exemplifies the character, personality and professionalism for which Shawn will
always be remembered. Shawn Silvera was a Lino Lakes officer killed in the line of duty in 2006. 1 had the privilege to
read his essay. Outstanding job!!!!!!!
The night continued and our small group of 7 individuals continued to receive academic and scenario based awards for
the events they participated in. In a room of 800 -900 explorers and much larger groups from around the metro area and
the state of MN, it was very impressive to see the awards accumulating on the table in front of us. At the end of the
night there were many table that had no awards, however to see 10 displayed side by side on the table in front of me
was beyond words.
I was so impressed and proud of these 7 young men that had trained for this. For some it was their fifth conference, but
for 3 of them it was their first time competing.
I want to thank them for their time and commitment to the program and for their dedication.
I am very proud of each and every one of you.
Awards received
Reporting Writing -5th place
Crime Prevention —15` place
Bomb Scene Search — 2nd
Emergency Field First Aid — 2nd place
Interview and Interrogation —4th place
Emergency Management -4th place
Arrest and Search —4th place
-1003-
Explorers
Carver Christianson
Carter Hendrickson
Bryce Martin
Dylan Rimas
Ethan Salinas
Ben Wenande
Brandon Wenande
I can't forget to thank the advisors as well for the great job they do to prepare the explorers for this conference and
competition. Jane Phil and Paul attended the conference as advisors, but also the others that helped with the training
and support of this program. Thank you and keep up the good work.
f a-
it
Confidentiality Notice: This e -mail message, including any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
m
�l
t
estOnka
i
''� �%{zstoncaCs'oci�
Westonka Historical Society
P.O. Box 84
Mound MN 55364
952- 472 -9800
westonkahistoricalsociety.org
The Westonka Historical Society has been invited to display a part of the collection of Tonka
Toys at the 10,000 Lakes Concours d'Elegance. It is a prestigious presentation of cars that
have to meet a certain set of criteria to be invited. The cars are arranged by year and they
depict history of the collectibles in style, color, design and technology. This is the second
year of this event and 125 cars have been chosen. it is being held on the Excelsior
Commons Sunday June 151 from 10:00 a.m. — 4:00 p.m. Admission is $25
Ron Pauly will oversee the project. He has already identified the toys to be displayed.
One (1) volunteer to ride along Sun. 6/1 at 7:30 to attend the toys while they are being
unloaded and assist with unpacking.
Two (2) volunteers Sun 6/1 from 10:00 — 12:00
Two (2) volunteers Sun 6/1 from 12:00 — 2:00
Two (2) volunteers Sun 6 /1from 2:00 —4:00
Two (2) volunteers Sun 6/1 at 4:00 to pack, transport, and unpack the toys at the WHS
museum.
We need large pieces of bubble wrap or old towels for packing the toys.
Where can we put your name to help? RSVP to Ron Pauly at 952 -472 -1809 or email at
moatz2009 @aol.com
*Footnote: As a volunteer you will have a pass to get in free. Someone will meet you at the
entrance to give you your pass.
Also, the event will be cancelled in case of rain. Plan to attend unless notified otherwise.
-1005-
Via Mail
May 1, 2014
Dear Community Official:
Theresa Sunde
Government Relations Manager
Pursuant to FCC regulations governing cable television, we are informing you that Mediacom
Communications is making these changes to our channel lineup:
Effective on or around June 1: FXX (212) and FXX HD (760) will move from the Sports and
Information/ Digital Plus package to Family Cable. Channel locations will remain the same.
For newer TV's, it may be necessary to reprogram or re -scan your TV. Additional Equipment
or services may be required. Mediacom customers may call 866 - 609 -6180 for more
information. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 507- 837 -4878
or email me at tsunde @mediacomcc.com.
Sincerely,
Headend: Saint Peter
Mediacom Communications Corporation
1504 2nd Street SE, -1006 -- -a, Minnesota 56093
MINNETRISTA 1 MOUND
SPECIAL CLEAN UP DAY
Saturday, May 10, 2014 — 8 am to 3
City of Minnetrista
7701 County Road 110 West
Minnetrista, MN 55364
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE ACCEPTED:
Paper Shredding -11:00 am —1:00 pm Only - $1.50 per brown paper grocery bag
Appliances: $10 each: Dehumidifiers, Dishwashers, Dryers, Freezers, Furnaces, Garage Door Openers, Garbage
Disposals, Humidifiers, Microwaves, Refrigerators, Stoves, Trash Compactors, Washers, Water
Heaters, Water Softeners. $75 each: gas refrigerator under 4'
Batteries: No charge for household batteries. No charge for car batteries.
Carpet: $1.25 /per square yard (Jute, Rubber, Foam Padding)
Concrete: $1.00 /per construction size block
Electronics: $5.00 — laptop computers, stereo, CD players, VCR/DVD players, small printers, computer box
$10.00.13 "CRT TV, small laser printers $15.00 —19" CRT TV, CRT computer Monitors,
$20.00.25 "CRT TV,large laser print ers
* *Hennepin County Drop -off centers accept Electronics year round — FREE— Ask for more info **
Fluorescent Bulbs: 4 ft: $.25 each 8 ft: $.50 each
Furniture: $5.00 Chairs and Recliners $8.00 Loveseat $15.00 Sofa $25.00 - Hide -a -bed
Mattresses /Box Springs: $15.00 each (ail sizes)
Misc Items: $15.00 /cubic yard - Household Plastic, Plastic Toys, Styrofoam, Foam Rubber, Vacuum Cleaners
Phone Books: No charge
Scrap Metal: No charge for: Lawn Mowers, Swing Sets, Lawn Furniture, Grills, Auto Parts, Springs, Pipe, Metal
Window Frames (no glass), Auto Batteries, etc. $1 charge: Bicycles w /tires
Tires: $2.00 Car and Pickup $6.00 Semi Truck $25.00 Tractor
Household items: NO CHARGE for Clothing, Small working appliances, Games, Domestic Items (pots, pans, dishes, etc),
Tools, Lamp, etc will be accepted
ANY QUESTIONS: CALL City of Minnetrista at 952.446.1660 or City of Mound at 952.472.0603
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED:
Brush, Leaves, Newspaper, Cans, Cardboard, Construction Waste, Garbage, Glass, Hazardous Waste (Paint, Oil Thinners, etc.)
Insulation, Lumber Wood, Treated Lumber Gas Refrigerators
-1007-
Hennepin County Memo
Department of Environmental Services Phone: 612 -348 -3777
701 Fourth Ave. South, Suite 700 Fax: 612 - 348 -8532 or 612 - 348 -6510
Minneapolis, MN 55415 -1842 www.hennenin.us
Subject: 2014 Community HHW Collection Events
Ten Household Hazardous Waste Collection Events are currently scheduled for 2014. The
dates and sites are:
May 15 - 17 City of Minnetonka — Public Works Site (Site Code: LV)
11522 Minnetonka Blvd.
Minnetonka, MN 55305
May 29 — 31 City of Minneapolis — PW Garage Snelling Ave. Site (Site Code: LA)
360744 1h St. E
Minneapolis, MN 55404
June 12 - 14 City of St. Louis Park — SLP Junior High School Site (Site Code: OD)
2025 Texas Ave. S.
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
(enter off 22 d St. West)
June 26 — 28 City of Minneapolis — Anthony Middle School Site (Site Code: LQ)
5757 Irving Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55419
(enter off Sunrise Drive)
July 31 — Aug. 2 City of Minneapolis — Jenny Lind School Site (Site Code: AL)
5026 Dupont Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55430
Aug. 7 — 9 City of Minneapolis — South High School Site (Site Code: LD)
3131 19th Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55407
(enter off 21St Ave. S.)
Aug. 21 — 23 City of Minneapolis — proposed Recycling & HHW Site (Site Code: OF)
34027 th Ave. NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Sept. 18 — 20 City of Minneapolis — UoM parking lot C66 Site (Site Code: NY)
2904 Fairmount St. SE
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Oct. 2 — 4 City of Shorewood — Public Works Site (Site Code: NW)
24200 Smithtown Road
Shorewood, MN 55331
Oct. 9 — 11 City of Minneapolis — PW Garage Snelling Ave. Site (Site Code: LA)
360744 th St. E
Minneapolis, MN 55404
Sites will be open to the public from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. each day of the collection.
Only household hazardous waste and household problem materials are being collected. The
following wastes are not accepted:
asbestos (friable)
biological waste (medical & infectious)
business generated waste
compressed gas cylinders & tanks greater than 40 pounds
construction debris
electronics
explosives
garbage
major appliances
oil (motor, transmission, cutting, lubricating, etc.)
oil filters
pharmaceuticals
radioactive
recyclables (card board, glass, metal, paper, phone books, plastic, etc.)
tires
yard waste
�009-
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 27, 2014 - 7:00 PM
REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
*Consent Agenda. Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call
vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will
be removedfrom the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
Open meeting
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approve agenda, with any amendments
4. *Consent Agenda
*A. Approve payment of claims
*B. Approve minutes: May 13, 2014 regular meeting
*C. Approve permits for Tour de Tonka, with pit stop at Wolner Field, with fees
paid
1. Public Gathering Permit
2. Live Music Permit
*D. Approve Public Gathering Permit for Fishers of Men Bass Tournament at
Centerview Beach, with fees paid: Aug 23, 2014
*E. Approve Pay Request by Advanced Wall Structures, Inc, for Emergency
Retaining Wall Replacement at 5097 Three Points Boulevard, in the amount
of $33,210.00
*F. Approve Resolution Approving Variance for 6260 Birch Lane, PID #14 -117
-24 -32 -0040
*G. Approve Resolutions for 2201 Centerview Lane, PID #13- 117 -24 -31 -0040
1. Resolution Approving Minor Subdivision at 2201 Centerview Lane
- Planning Case No. 14 -05
2. Resolution Approving Variances at 2201 Centerview Lane — Planning
Case No. 14 -06
5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda.
(Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.)
Page
1010 -1027
1028 -1034
1035
1036
1037 -1038
1039 -1040
1041 -1065
1066 -1094
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
6. Steve McDonald, representing Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP, presenting the 2013 1095 -1096
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and Management Letter, and requesting
Action receiving the same (see separate report)
7. Jay Green, Mound representative to the LMCD, requesting action on Right -of -Entry 1097
for Surfside ramp access to allow watercraft inspectors to perform inspections for
the 2014 boating season providing:
A. Summary of inspection data from 2013
B. AIS prevention literature
8. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer, with update on costs to move 1098 -1100
City Hall and upgrade the Centennial Building for rentals
9. Mark Wegscheid, Council Member, on the process of providing packets to Council 1101
Members
10. Kandis Hanson, City Manager, on the City's involvement in ribbon cuttings and 1102
ground breakings
11. Kandis Hanson, City Manager, requesting discussion and any action on remembrance 1103
for former Senator Steve Smith
12. Information/Miscellaneous
A.
Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager
B.
Minutes:
C.
Reports:
Bolton & Menk Engineering: Dec 2013 YTD
1104 -1106
Mar 2014 YTD
1107 -1108
Finance Dept: 2014 YTD
1109 -1110
D.
Correspondence:
Letter from Metropolitan Council with population
1111 -1112
Estimate: May 15, 2014
2014 Westonka DARE Open
1113
13. Adjourn
Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More
current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. citi�nfi�r�iWhl coin
2014
04- 14BOLTMNK
$
96,884.55
2014
052714CITY
$
96,098.15
2014 052714HWS $ 79,329.84
TOTAL CLAIMS 4444
Fl
CffY OF €fiIC1UND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: May 2014
Batch Name 04- 14BOLTMNK User Dollar Amt $96,884.55
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $96,884.55
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 4 BOLTONAND MENK, INCORPORA
Cash Payment E 402 - 43120 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0166030 4/3012014
Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0166032 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0166033 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 401 - 43112 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0166034 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0166025 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0166023 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 401 -43113 -303 Engineering Fees
Invoice 0166035 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0166036 4130/2014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0166024 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -300 Professional Srvs
MSA SYSTEM UPDATE SVCS THRU APRIL
11 2014
SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU APRIL
11 2014
2010 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJECT
ENGINEERING SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014
2012 NORTH ISLAND STREET PROD. PW 12-
01 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014
Project PW1201
UPDATE STREET & UTILITY MAPS
ENGINEERING THRU APRIL 11 2014
Project 14-4
GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS THRU ARIL
11 2014
2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PRO.. PW13-
01 ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014
Project PW 1301
2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW13-
06 ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014
Project PW1306
WATER SYSTEM MODELING ENG SVCS
THRU APRIL 11 2014
STORMWATER UTILITY -SWPPP UPDATE
ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014
Invoice 0166027 4130/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23296 FRIEDRICHSON- FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD RD SKETCHPLAN REVIEW -ENG
SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014
Invoice 0166026 4/30/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Refer 5 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0166031 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 401- 43114 -303 Engineering Fees
Invoice 0166038 4/3012014
Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0166037 4/30/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0166039 4/30/2014
05/22114 11:07 AM
Page 1
$1,567.50
$290.00
$98.00
$196.00
$5,133.50
$4,003.00
$18,428.00
$1,634.50
$1,197.75
$89.00
$72.50
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32,709.75
GIS UPDATES ENG SVC THRU APRIL 112014 $110.00
2014 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PRO.. PW14- $44,903.00
01 ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014
Project PW1401
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROV 2014 PROJ $5,352.50
PW14 -04 ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014
Project PW1404
2014 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 14 -03 $9,497.30
ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014
Project P W 1403
-1011-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: May 2014
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0166040
4/30/2014
Cash Payment
E 427 - 43121 -303 Engineering Fees
Invoice 0166041
4/3012014
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0166042
4/30/2014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT
427 SEAL COAT FUND
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
05/22/14 11:07 AM
Page 2
2014 BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN
$2,825.00
REPLACE PROD PW 14 -08 ENG SVC THRU
APRIL 11 2014
Pr oject PW1408
2014 CRACK & SEALCOAT IMPROV PROJ.
$101.50
PW 14 -06 ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014
Project PW1406
2015 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW15 -03
$1,385.50
ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014
Project PW 1503
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$64,174.80
10100 Wells Fargo
$4,185.50
$63,527.00
$1,567.50
$101.50
$4,022.75
$17,748.80
$5,731.50
$96,884.55
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $96,884.55
Total $96,884.55
-1012-
-1013-
.__...` CITY OF MOUND
05/22/14 1:51 PM
— .—
.
Page 1
Payments
CITY
OFMOUND
Current Period: May 2014
Batch Name
052714CITY User Dollar
Amt $96,098.15
Payments Computer Dollar
Amt $96,098.15
$0.00 In Balance
Refer
1 3D SPECIALTIES
-
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
48 YELLOW T- SHIRTS W/ MOUND LOGO ON
$1,123.67
POCKETS
Invoice 445197
5/7/2014
Project 14 -5
Transaction Date 5/19/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,123.67
Refer
2 ALLIED GENERATORS
_
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs
GENERATOR REPAIR LABOR
$210.00
Invoice 5634
5/6/2014
Project 14 -5
Transaction Date 5/1912014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$210.00
Refer
3 ALPHA RUG AND CARPET CLEANI
_
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41930 -460 Janitorial Services
CARPET CLEANING- PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG-
$350.00
SQUAD ROOM, EXERCISE, ROOM, LOWER
LEVEL, ALL HALLS
Invoice 2864
5/12/2014
Transaction Date 5/19/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$350.00
Refer
4 AMSAN
_
Cash Payment
E 222 -42260 -460 Janitorial Services
CREDIT PREV ORDER FD
-$6.91
Invoice 310418033 5/5/2014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment
E 101- 41930 -460 Janitorial Services
10 PERMANENT USE FLOOR MATS- CITY
$3,660.00
HALL ENTRY AREAS
Invoice 310418033 5/5/2014
Transaction Date 5/1912014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,653.09
Refer
43 ANCOMCOMMUNICATIONS�
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -325 Pagers -Fire Dept.
MINITOR V PROGRAMMING KIT
$236.00
Invoice 45005
5/2/2014 PO 24290
Transaction Date 5122/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$236.00
.., ,.�.. ..,
Refer
...� ....... ... .. ....... ...
5 APACHE GROUP
_
Cash Payment
E 101- 41930 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE, CUPS
$457.01
Invoice 172651
5/1212014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE, CUPS
$457.01
Invoice 172651
5/12/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 41930 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
CREDIT- RETURN C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET
- $403.86
TISSUE
Invoice 172651
5/14/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
CREDIT - RETURN C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET
- 5403.86
TISSUE
Invoice 172651
5/14/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -41930 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE
$404.04
Invoice 172742
5/15/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE
$404.04
Invoice 172742
5/15/2014
Transaction Date
5/19/2014
11 ,,.,.„,,
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
I,
$914.38
., ... 1 111,11, . -_, ,,,.w ..... 1 . ,.
Refer 53 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY
n, -...w .- I - l _ I'll - I I . - 11
, . „. 11 1 1 ,,..
-1013-
CiTY OF [40UND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: May 2014
05/22/14 1:51 PM
Page 2
Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maintenance SERVICE GLEN ELYN LIFT STATION 5-7-14 - $358.90
ATS POWER FAILURE-CHANGED INPUT
CONTACT
Invoice 276e0
5/15/2014
Transaction Date
5/22/2014
1 11
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
"1 1.1111, 111,1 111-11111 1 -111, 1 1 11 1 11 1 1
1 11 -1 11 1-11 1-1-1111-1.
Refer
,1111 .. 111111.11 -1 "I'll, ,
6 BAILEY NURSERIES, INC.
.....,,.».,., -.,a, 11
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material
35 TREES FOR STREETSCAPE & PARKS
Invoice 0372097
5/13/2014 PO 24357
Transaction Date
5/19/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer
7 BERGQUIST, RODGER
Cash Payment
R 601-49400-37144 Sales of Meters & Rea DEDUCT METER REFUND- 2645 HALSTEAD
LANE
Invoice 05272014 5/16/2014
Transaction Date 5/19/2014
Refer 8 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
Cash Payment E 101-41930-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 1170734 5/3/2014
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 1172735 5/14/2014
Transaction Date 5/19/2014
Refer — 10 _CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPAN
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
Invoice 1352010 5/7/2014
Transaction Date 5/19/2014
Refer u 9 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG
Cash Payment E 101-41930-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 05272014 4/2112014
Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 05272014 412112014
Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 05272014 4/21/2014
Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 05272014 4/2112014
Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 05272014 4121/2014
Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 05272014 4/21/2014
Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 05272014 4/21/2014
Transaction Date 5/19/2014
Refer 55 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO.
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
Invoice 140515 5/15/2014
Transaction Date 5/22/2014
Refer 38 DAHM, DOUGLAS
Wells Fargo 10100
COFFEE MACHINE EQUIP LEASE- MAY
JUNE, JULY 2014 CITY HALL
COFFEE & CREAMER FIRE DEPT
Wells Fargo 10100
TWO 5 GAL CURE & SEAL
Wells Fargo 10100
GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14
GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14
GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14
GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14
GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14
GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14
Total
Total
$358,90
$901.30
$901.30
$125.00
$125.00
$45.00
$120.00
$165,00
$218.15
Total $218.15
$681.16
$681.16
$680.59
$866.52
$1,461.10
Project 14-3
$312.48
GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 DEPOT BLDG $187.93
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,870.94
DURA DRIVE HOTMIX 23.13 TONS $1,259.42
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,259.42
g1 m
CITY OF MOUND
05/22/141:51 PM
----- -
Page 3
Payments
e
tTY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -37144 Sales of Meters & Rea
DEDUCT METER REFUND- 5108
$275.00
EDGEWATER- D. DAHM
Invoice 05272014 5/19/2014
Transaction Date 5/2112014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$275.00
Refer 44 DOCK MASTERS OF LAKE MTKA, I _
Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL MULTIPLE DOCK SLIPS
$6,356.00
Invoice 202558 5/20/2014
Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
NEW & USED MUD PLATES- HIGHLAND &
$162.50
TWIN PARKS
Invoice 202559 5120/2014
Transaction Date 5/22/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$6,518.50
Refer 11 DURKIN, DAVID _
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL/REPAIR TIMBER RETAINING WALL-
$3,500.00
2063 COMMERCE BLVD- INSURANCE RECVD
Invoice 05272014 5/1512014
Transaction Date 5/1912014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,500.00
Refer 12 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cash Payment E475-46386-300 Professional Srvs
TIF 1 -3 CONSULTING & ADVISORY SVCS-
$1,998.75
APRIL 2014
Invoice 348185 5/12/2014
Transaction Date 5/19/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,998.75
Refer EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC.__ _
_45
Cash Payment E 101- 42115 -329 Sirens /Phone Linesl
3 EMERGENCY SIRENS- 6 MO MTCE FEE-
$753.12
JULY 1 THRU DEC 31 2014
Invoice 33482 5/15/2014
Transaction Date 5/22/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$753.12
Refer 46 EMERGENCY APPARA TUS MAINT _
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair
FLEX DRAW LATCH FOR HALE CHIEF 2
$28.95
FLOTO PUMP
Invoice 74240 5/8/2014
Transaction Date 5/22/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$28.95
Refer 54 EMERYS TREE SERVICE, INCORP _
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -533 Tree Removal
REMOVE TREES ALONG ACCESS RD 5 -14 -14
$1,945.00
Invoice 19224 5/19/2014
Transaction Date 5/22/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,945.00
Refer 41 FINANCEAND COMMERCE _
Cash Payment E 401- 43114 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
ADV FOR BIDS 2014 STREET IMPROV PROJ
$189.59
PW 14 -01
Invoice 741586685 511912014
Project PW1401
Transaction Date 5/22/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$189.59
Refer 47 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES I _
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic
COAT ADVANCE CLEANING &
$109.95
INSPECTIONS- HENTGES & STEVENS- LION
TOTAL CARE
Invoice 8341 5/15/2014
Transaction Date 5/22/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$109.95
Refer 42 FRED HOLASEK & SON, INC _
-1015-
43 T `t` OF 1,11OUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: May 2014
05/22/14 1:51 PM
Page 4
Cash Payment G 101 -22808 Adopt A Green Space FLOWERS - PLANTS FOR DEPOT & $310.00
SURFSIDE PARK- JAYCEES ADOPT A
GREEN SPACE
Invoice 00016332 5/17/2014
Transaction Date 5/22/2014
Refer 14 G & K SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006289994 5/5/2014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006289994 5/5/2014
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006289994 5/5/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 1006289994 5/5/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006221716 3/24/2014
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006221716 3/24/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006221716 3/24/2014
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 1006221716 3/24/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006301231 5/1212014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006301231 5/12/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006301231 5/12/2014
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 1006301231 5/12/2014
Transaction Date 5/1912014
Refer 13 G & K SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 1006301233 5/1212014
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006221717 3/24/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 1006221717 3/2412014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 1006221709 3/24/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 1006301226 5/12/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 1006312581 5/1912014
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 1006301234 5112/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 1006301234 5/12/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$310.00
UNIFORM SVC 5 -05 -14
$25.21
UNIFORM SVC 5 -05 -14
$25.65
UNIFORM SVC 5 -05 -14
$36.84
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -05 -14
$139.51
Project 14 -3
$42.53
UNIFORM SVC 3 -24 -14
$25.21
UNIFORM SVC 3 -24 -14
$25.65
UNIFORM SVC 3 -24 -14
$36.84
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -24 -14
$408.58
Project 14 -3
UNIFORM SVC 5 -12 -14
$25.21
UNIFORM SVC 5 -12 -14 $25.65
UNIFORM SVC 5 -12 -14
$36.84
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -12 -14
$182.94
Project 14 -3
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$994.13
MAT SVC 5 -12 -14 CITY HALL
$58.94
UNIFORM SVC 3 -24 -14 PARKS
$42.53
MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -24 -14 PARKS
$65.27
MAT SVC 5 -12 -14 LIQUOR STOREMAT SVC
$69.98
& SUPPLIES 3 -24 -14 HWS
MAT SVC 5 -12 -14 LIQUOR STORE $69.98
MAT SVC 5 -19 -14 LIQUOR STORE $69.98
SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -12 -14 PARKS $75.11
UNIFORM SVC 5 -12 -14 PARKS $52.11
-1016-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Cr
,TY OF MOUND
05/22/14 1:51 PM
Page 5
Current Period: May 2014
Transaction Date 511912014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $503.90
Refer 15 GUSTAFSON, BRUCE
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 05272014 5/12/2014
Transaction Date 5119/2014
m
Refer 16 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice C351205 5/2/2014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice C337901
4/30/2014 P024356
Transaction Date
5/19/2014
18 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO
_Refer
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -418 Other Rentals
Invoice 1000045230 511/2014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -418 Other Rentals
Invoice 1000045162 5/1/2014
Transaction Date 5/19/2014
Refer 17 HERREID & ASSOCIATES
Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 1002 5112/2014
2014 BOOT ALLOWANCE REIMB- B. $150.00
GUSTAFSON
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.00
GPS COMMAND LINK- SENSUS METERING $7.92
SYSTEM
4 HYDRATFINDER FLAG MARKERS, SOCKET $103.40
DRIVER, QUIK CAP
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $111.32
PIN RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE - $127.20
APRIL 2014
Project 14 -3
FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE & $790.26
ADMINISTRATION FEE - APRIL 2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $917.46
LABOR RELATIONS SVC- PUBLIC $905.00
WORKS /PARKS FEB & MARCH 2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 49999 -300 Professional Srvs
LABOR RELATIONS SVC -CITY HALL APRIL &
$3,077.26
Invoice 007 - 005 -68 519/2014
MAY 2014
Invoice 1002
5/12/2014
$269.75
Transaction Date 5/19/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,982.26
Refer
19 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I
_
2201 CENTERVIEW LN SUBDV PLANNING
Cash Payment
E 101- 42400 -300 Professional Srvs
MISC PLANNING SVCS APRIL 2014
$1,542.17
Invoice 007- 001
-72 5/9/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23297 JESBERG -1728 FINCH LN -P 1728 FINCH LN VARIANCE PLANNING SVCS
Cash Payment
G 101 -23296 FRIEDRICHSON- FAIRFIELD
5913 FAIRFIELD RD SUBD PLANNING SVCS
$41.50
Invoice 007 - 005 -68 5/9/2014
APRIL 2014
Transaction Date 5/19/2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -68 519/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23298 BENCHMARK -2308 DRIFTW 2308 DRIFTWOOD EXPAN PLANNING SVCS
$166.00
APRIL 2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -68 519/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23299 PELLETT -6260 BIRCH LN 1
6260 BIRCH LANE VARIANCE PLANNING
$269.75
SVCS APRIL 2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -68 51912014
Cash Payment G 101 -23300 KING2201 CENTERVIEW C
2201 CENTERVIEW LN SUBDV PLANNING
$62.25
SVCS APRIL 2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -68 5/9/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23297 JESBERG -1728 FINCH LN -P 1728 FINCH LN VARIANCE PLANNING SVCS
$166.00
APRIL 2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -68 5/9/2014
Transaction Date 5/19/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
,
$2,247.67
_ . _
Refer 20 HOME DEPOT /GECF (PiWj _
1017-
CMY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: May 2014
05122/14 1*51 PM
Page 6
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies
.COM COMPRESSOR- SIGN SHOP
$99.97
Invoice 1086103
4/18/2014
Project 14-3
Transaction Date 5/21/2014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$99.97
Refer 21 INFRATECH
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic
VAC DEBRIS- WATER TOWER CLEANING 4-
$2,350.00
BEACHWOOD RD
24-14
5/16/2014
Invoice 140253 4124/2014
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic JET VAC CLEANING 4-30-14
$822.50
Invoice 140261
4/3012014
Transaction Date 5/21/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,172,50
Refer
22 JENKS, GUY
Cash Payment
R 601-49400-37144 Sales of Meters & Rea DEDUCT METER REFUND -6120
$125.00
BEACHWOOD RD
Invoice 05272014
5/16/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$125.00
Refer
23 JESSENPRESS INCORPORATED
Cash Payment
E 101-41110-350 Printing
PRINT, MAIL-CITY CONTACT NEWS 8 PG
$1,400.00
MAY-JUNE-JULY 2014 6,000 COPIES
Invoice 42116
4/30/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,400.00
Refer
48 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN
Cash Payment
E 475-46386-300 Professional SNs
HRA LEGAL SVCS- DEVELOPER DAY MTGS,
$224,00
ASSISTED LIVING PROPOSAL- APRIL 2014
Invoice 120112
5/2012014
Cash Payment
E 475-46386-300 Professional Sws
2014 TIF 1-3 SPECIAL LEGISLATION -LEGAL
$42.00
SVCS APRIL 2014
Invoice 120112
5/20/2014
Transaction Date 5/22/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$266.00
Refer
56 LAKE RESTORATION, INC.
Cash Payment
E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic SHORELINE DR POND TREATMENT #1-
$216.00
DUCKWEED, SUBMERGED WEEDS & ALGAE
Invoice 112179
4/29/2014
Transaction Date 512212014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$216.00
Refer
24 LIBERTY TITLE INC. -ELK RIVER
Cash Payment
R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu
REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT-4431
$358.65
DENBIGH D. NELSON
Invoice 05272014
5/1512014
Transaction Date
5/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$358.65
Refer
25 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR
Cash Payment
E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying
COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - COLOR
$75.89
OVERAGE - 4/14/14 TO 5113/14
Invoice 1747136
5/512014
Cash Payment
E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying
COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - BNV
$189.11
OVERAGE - 4/14/14 TO 5/13/14
Invoice 1747136
5/5/2014
Transaction Date
2/19/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
.........
$265.00
Refer 49 MAAS, JASON
.
-1018-
CITY OF MOUND
05/22/14 1:51 PM
- ` -��
Page 7
Payments
MY OF i40UND
Current Period: May 2014
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
DUTY UNIFORM SHOES- REIMB J. MAAS
$38.24
Invoice 05272014 5/21/2014
Transaction Date 5/22/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$38.24
Refer 26 MEDIACOM
Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells
ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 5 -16 -14 THRU 6-
$85.90
15 -14
Invoice 05272014 5/612014
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CHARGE
$0.57
Invoice 05272014 5/6/2014
Transaction Date 5/19/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$86.47
Refer 39 MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTYMANA _
Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL- CITY MGR K.
$138.00
HANSON- CITY MGMT ASSOC
Invoice 05272014 5121/2014
Transaction Date 5/21/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$138.00
Refer 27 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH _
_
Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -37170 State fee - Water
2ND QTR 2014 COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY
$5,793.00
SVC CONNECTION FEE
Invoice 05272014 5/8/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,793.00
Refer 57 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS COMPA _
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials
CSS- IH ASPHALT EMULSION
$262.00
Invoice 70465 5/13/2014
Transaction Date 5/21/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$262.00
Refer 28 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA TIO _
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib
MAY 2014 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION
$12,250.00
CONTRIBUTION
Invoice 05272014 5/1/2014
Transaction Date 5/2012014 Wells Fargo 10100
_Refer 29 NS/1 MECHANICAL CONTRACTING, _
Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic PREVENTIVE MTCE AGREEMENT MAY
THRU AUG 2014 CENT BLDG
Invoice C003296 518/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100
I'll, 1 .11 11-1 11111, 1-1111-11, 11
1. - - -
�
Refer 37 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE)
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -200 Office Supplies COPY PAPER, COLOR INK, 9V ALK
BATTERIES- FD
Invoice 710243782001 4/23/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Refer 36 OFFICEDEPOT
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 710243782001 4/23/2014 PO 23451
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Refer 30 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS
Cash Payment E 60249450 -322 Postage
Invoice 140439 5/11/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
2 ERGONOMIC OFFICE CHAIRS- HWS
Wells Fargo 10100
APRIL 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE
-1019-
Total $12,250.00
$1,228.00
Total $1,228.00
$104.21
Total $104.21
$439.98
Total $439.98
$325.97
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
CffY OF MOUND
05/22/14 1:51 PM
Page 8
Current Period: May 2014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute APRIL 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,804.47
PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT
Invoice 140439 5/11/2014
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute APRIL 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,804.47
PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT
Invoice 140439
5/1112014
Cash Payment
E 601 - 49400 -322 Postage
Invoice 140439
5/11/2014
Transaction Date
5/19/2014
Refer 31 PREMIUM WATERS, INC
Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 603679 -04 -14 4/30/2014
APRIL 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $325.97
Wells Fargo 10100
5- 5 GAL WATER HOT & COLD WATER
COOLER- CITY MGR
Total $4,260.88
$39.74
Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -440 Other Contractual Servic
MAY THRU JULY 2014 HOT & COLD WATER
$68.85
Cash Payment
COOLER- SQUAD ROOM
ADV FOR BIDS 2014 STREET IMPROV PROD -
Invoice 614850 -04 -14 4/30/2014
LEGAL NTCE 5 -17 -14
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -210 Operating Supplies
PUB WKS HOT & COLD WATER COOLER
$68.85
Transaction Date 5/2012014
RENTAL MAY THRU JULY 2014
Refer
Invoice 614851 -04 -14 4/3012014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment
Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -210 Operating Supplies
CITY HALL HOT & COLD WATER COOLER
$68.85
RENTAL MAY THRU JULY 2014
Invoice 05272014
Invoice 614850 -04 -14 4/30/2014
Transaction Date 512012014
Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -210 Operating Supplies
CENT BLDG HOT & COLD WATER COOLER
$68.85
RENTAL MAY THRU JULY 2014
E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
Invoice 604558 -04 -14 4/30/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
>N-
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
- w.-,n. , 11 , , ,., ,
$315.14
„. ..,.
- .. —., , ... -.a,b — .... , - -.
32 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY
-e- -"',- ',,,
_Refer
Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
LEGAL NTCE 5 -3 -14- STORMWATER
$42.41
POLLUTION PREVENT MTG
Invoice 98272
51312014
Cash Payment
E 401- 43114 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
ADV FOR BIDS 2014 STREET IMPROV PROD -
LEGAL NTCE 5 -17 -14
Invoice 102603
5/1712014
Project PW1401
Transaction Date 5/2012014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer
33 SWARTZER, BRIAN _
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
REPAIR CHAIN SAW CHAPS- SEW LIKE
NEW -REIMB B. SWARTZER
Invoice 05272014
5/12/2014
Transaction Date 512012014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer
34 SWEEPER SERVICES _
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
SIDE BOOM RETAINER- STREET SWEEPER
Invoice 14066 5/8/2014
Transaction Date 5/2012014 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 50 TRI TECH DISPENSING _
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair WIRE IN COMPRESSOR STARTER KIT
Invoice 49282 51712014
Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 59 UHL COMPANY _
-1020-
Total
Total
$139.44
$181.85
$18.67
$18.67
$175.68
$175.68
$278.00
$278.00
CITY OF MOUND 05/22/141:51 PM
"- Page 9
\ Payments
»!TY CIF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260402 Building Maintenance REPAIR MOTOR ROOFTOP UNIT, REPAIR $349.12
WATER HEATER SWITCH, REPLACE
THERMOSTAT NORTH ENTRY HEATER,
REPLACE DPST RELAY WEST ENTRY HTR
Invoice 26999 5/14/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance REPAIR MOTOR ROOFTOP UNIT, REPAIR $3,142.03
WATER HEATER SWITCH, REPLACE
THERMOSTAT NORTH ENTRY HEATER,
REPLACE DPST RELAY WEST ENTRY HTR
Invoice 26999
5/1412014
Transaction Date 5/21/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer
51 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
_
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
28 FIRE DEPT SHIELD BADGES
Invoice 205216
5/13/2014 PO 24400
Transaction Date 5/22/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer
52 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE
_
Cash Payment
E 60949750 -210 Operating Supplies
TWINE GREEN 9000- HWS
Invoice 21 -19980 4/2/2014
Transaction Date 5/22/2014
Refer 36 VERIZON WIRELESS
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 9724998484 5/10/2014
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 9724998484 5/1012014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 9724998484 5/10/2014
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $3,491.15
$1,718.00
Total $1,718,00
$41.75
Total $41,75
DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 5 -11 -14 THRU
6 -10 -2014
DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 5 -11 -14 THRU
6 -10 -2014
DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 5 -11 -14 THRU
6 -10 -2014
DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 5 -11 -14 THRU
6 -10 -2014
Invoice 9724998484 5/10/2014
Transaction Date 5120/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 58 VESSCO, INCORPORATED _
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic WELL HOUSE CHLORINE SYSTEM WORK 5-
14-14
Invoice 60250 511512014
Transaction Date 5/21/2014
Refer 35 XCEL ENERGY
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 519892093 515/2014
Transaction Date 512012014
Refer 40 XCEL ENERGY
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014
$46.68
$46.68
$46.68
$140.04
$280.08
$105.00
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $105.00
5341 MAYWOOD RD STREET LIGHTS -4 -3 TO
5 -2 -14
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14
ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 DEPOT
BLDG
-1021-
$5,053.03
$5,053.03
$102.45
$51.16
CITY OF MOUND 05/22/14 1:51 PM
-- �'-� Page 10
Payments
CITY OF NIOUN
Current Period: May 2014
Fund Summary
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27114 TO 4127/14
$3,792.34
Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014
$39,170.37
222
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14
$1,677.03
Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014
$6,518.50
285
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14
$2,500.56
Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014
$329.03
475
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27114 TO 4127/14
$1,475.52
Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014
$14,820.10
602
Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14
$1,360.58
Invoice 412322323 5/1312014
$2,479.67
675
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4127/14
$1,360.58
Invoice 412322323 5/1312014
$96,098.15
Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27114 TO 4/27/14
$852.32
Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014
Cash Payment E 285 -46388 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14
$1,798.45
Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014
Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27114
$43.46
Invoice 412322323 5/1312014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$15,014.45
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101
GENERALFUND
$39,170.37
222
AREA FIRE SERVICES
$18,198.17
281
COMMONS DOCKS FUND
$6,518.50
285
MOUND HRA
$1,798.45
401
GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
$329.03
475
TIF 1 -3 Mound Harbor Renaissan
$2,264.75
601
WATER FUND
$14,820.10
602
SEWER FUND
$10,260.70
609
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$2,479.67
675
STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
$258.41
$96,098.15
Pre- Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $96,098.15
Total $96,098.15
-1022-
CITY OF MOUND 05/22/1410: 43 AM
- _- Page 1
Payments
CITY OF NWUND
Current Period: May 2014
Batch Name 052714HWS User Dollar Amt $79,329.84
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $79,329.84
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE
$229.50
Invoice 437412904 519/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R FREIGHT
$1.00
Invoice 437412904 5/9/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$230.50
Refer 2 BELLBOY CORPORATION _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS, SUPPLIES
$62.40
Invoice 90173300 5114/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$66.50
Invoice 90173300 5/14/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$82.99
Invoice 90194800 5119/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$89.85
Invoice 43027300 5/14/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
$5,503.70
Invoice 43027300 5/1412014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
$6,733.44
Invoice 43090400 5/19/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT
$68.20
Invoice 43027300 5/14/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$12,607.08
Refer 3 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN
V
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$72.70
Invoice 132377 5/7/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
$710.05
Invoice 132378 5/7/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$185.60
Invoice 135787 5/21/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale BEER
$775.22
Invoice 135788 5121/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$1,743.57
Refer 4 BLUSKYPUBLISHING _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising 1/4 PAGE AD MAY
14 WEST LAKE BUSINESS
$140.00
PUBLICATION
Invoice 15971 5/1/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$140.00
Refer 5 COCA COLA BOTTLING- MIDWEST _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS-
MIX
$217.92
Invoice 0168052709 5/8/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$217.92
Refer 6_DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
$425.00
Invoice 68298 5/19/2014
-1023-
CITY OF MOUND 05/22/1410:43 AM
Page 2
J~ \ Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$5,572.35
Invoice 2213493
$333.76
Invoice 19993
5/12/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
$548.55
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Wells Fargo
� — -
10100
-
Total
-. 11
$758.76
11 -�
Refer
7 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY___
-
-
1
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $11,009.95
$82.90
Invoice 751749
5/13/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
- $10.75
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
Cash Payment
$841.50
Invoice 751750
5/13/2014
Invoice 617578
5/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
Total - $2116
Refer 12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
$52.60
Invoice 752803
5/20/2014
-1024-
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,67105
Invoice 752804
5/20/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$80.00
Invoice 752465
5/16/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$80.00
Invoice 000358
5/16/2014
Transaction Date
5120/2014
....
Wells Fargo
.....,
10100
...w-
Total
....�
$3,810.05
e....._
.�,_..
Refer
,. , 1111111" . _.w .. . . ..... ..........
8 EXCELSIOR BREWING COMPANY
. ,..—,
_
�
,.
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$126.00
Invoice 3683
5/6/2014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Fargo
- --
10100
Total
$126.00
Refer
9 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA
_
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$612.00
Invoice 166880
5115/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$9.00
Invoice 166880
5/15/2014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$621.00
Refer 10 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED
_
Cash Payment
E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$321.25
Invoice 702154
5/14/2014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$321.25
Refer 11 JJ TAYLOR, DISTRIBUTING MINN
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$5,572.35
Invoice 2213493
511312014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
$548.55
Invoice 2213532
5/20/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$4,889.05
Invoice 2213533
5/20/2014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $11,009.95
Refer -,. 13 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
_
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
- $10.75
Invoice 617577
5/2/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
- $12.41
Invoice 617578
5/2/2014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total - $2116
Refer 12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
_
--
-1024-
CITY OF MOUND 05/22/1410:43 AM
Page 3
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: May 2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
WINE
$33.99
Invoice 1850100
5/14/2014
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 1161576
$1,617.34
Invoice 1850098
5/14/2014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$2,666.20
Invoice 1850099
5/14/2014
$366.00
Invoice 822193
5/9/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$4,317.53
Refer
15 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA
Invoice 822295
5/13/2014
Cash Payment
E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
BEER
$774.38
Invoice 8449330
5/19/2014
Transaction Date
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$10.00
Invoice 8449330
5119/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$57.00
Invoice 8449343
5/19/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2.25
Invoice 8449343
5119/2014
Transaction Date
5/2012014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$843.63
Refer
14 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA
_
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$397.00
Invoice 8447862
5/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$0.00
Invoice 8447862
5/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$636.58
Invoice 8448197
5/12/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$12.50
Invoice 8448197
5/12/2014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$1,046.08
Refer 16 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,03915
Invoice 2604340
5/1412014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$3,580.30
Invoice 2604339
5/14/2014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$4,619.45
Refer, 17 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$528.50
Invoice 1161575
5/15/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$1,020.28
Invoice 1161576
5/15/2014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $1,548.78
Refer 19 TH ORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
_
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$366.00
Invoice 822193
5/9/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,643.00
Invoice 822295
5/13/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$228.00
Invoice 823579
5/16/2014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Farnn 10100
Total $4,237.00
i
MY OF MOUND
WAR WEN Pill WE
Payments
05122/14 10:43 AM
Page 4
Refer 22 WINE COMPANY
Cash Payment
Current Period: May 2014
WINE
Invoice 360781
5/8/2014
Cash Payment
Refer
18 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN_G_COMPAN _
Invoice 360781
5/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$181.22
Invoice 823606
5120/2014
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$88.30
Invoice 823607
5/20/2014
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$12,200.16
Invoice 823608
5/2012014
Invoice 361475
5/15/2014
Transaction Date
5/2012014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$12,469.68
Refer 20 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _
............... �
_Refer
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$216.00
Invoice 0098137
5/8/2014
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 503249
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$5.00
Invoice 0098137
51812014
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$207,92
Invoice 0098138
5/812014
BEER
Invoice 1090227544 5/21/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2.50
Invoice 0098138
51812014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$431.42
Refer 21 USA _
_
Cash Payment
_WEBLEASE
E 609 -49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic
MONTHLY WEBSITE SVC- HWS 5 -15 -14 TO 6-
$99.00
14 -14
Invoice 64980
5/1512014
Transaction Date
5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$99.00
Refer 22 WINE COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 360781
5/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
Invoice 360781
5/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 360940
5/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
Invoice 360940
5/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 361475
5/15/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
Invoice 361475
5/15/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Wells Fargo
-
23 WINEMERCHANTS-��
............... �
_Refer
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 503248
5/14/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 503249
5/14/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Wells Fargo
Refer
24 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
Invoice 1090227543 5/21/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
Invoice 1090227544 5/21/2014
-1026-
$576.00
$8.40
$280.00
$8.25
$776.00
$11.55
10100 Total $1,660.20
$1,969.10
$23.00
10100 Total $1,992.10
$7,556.90
$246.00
CITY OF MOUND 05122/14 10:43 AM
-'- Page 5
Payments
M
iOU �v
,.ti" r OF rat
Current Period: May 2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$43.00
Invoice 1090227545 5/21/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
-$8,80
Invoice RMA006271 5/2012014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$21.50
Invoice 1090223902 5/14/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$4,309.05
Invoice 1090223901 5/14/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
- $27.20
Invoice RMA004672 5/13/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $12,140.45
Refer 25 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT _
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,411.14
Invoice 1080179327 5/1512014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$1,027.22
Invoice 1080179326 5/15/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
-$6.00
Invoice 2080042457 5/1412014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
- 5105.00
Invoice 2080040791 5/9/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
$34.24
Invoice 1080179328 5/15/2014
Transaction Date 5/20/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $2,361.60
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $79,329.84
$79,329.84
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $79,329.84
Total $79,329.84
-1027-
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 13, 2014
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on
Tuesday, May 13, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building.
Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Kelli
Gillispie and Ray Salazar
Members absent: None
Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Fin Dir /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche,
Community Development Director Sarah Smith, County Assessor Kari Kamrath, County
Assessor Rob Winge, Consultant Rita Trapp, Seth Anderson, Rachel Christensen, Lily Hames,
Stephani Boyum, Paul Boyum, Cliff Simon, Curt Nelson, Jim Reuper, Josh Leddy, Jessica
Rashleger, Kent Friedrichsen, Matthew Van Nelson, Jordan Korczak, Jeff Lundgren
Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in
nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a
Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent
Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
1. Open meeting
Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
2. Pledae of Allegiance
3. Approve agenda
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
4. Mayor Mark Hanus with "Mayor for the Day" Proclamations
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to approve the following proclamations. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
A. Proclamation naming Rachel Christensen as "Deputy Mayor for a Day' in the City of
Mound, Minnesota.
B. Proclamation naming Seth Anderson as "Deputy Mayor for a Day" in the City of
Mound, Minnesota.
C. Proclamation naming Lily Hames as "Deputy Mayor for a Day' in the City of Mound,
Minnesota.
5. Consent agenda
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the consent agenda as amended.
Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $271,194.76.
B. Approve minutes of the April 22, 2014 regular meeting.
I
Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014
C. Approve Fire Inspection Permit for Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church — "The Blast"
on Saturday, May 17, 2014 with fees paid.
D. Approve permit for Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for the Northwest Tonka Lions —
WeCAN Fundraising Event on May 16, 2014 with fee paid.
E. RESOLUTION NO.14 -33: RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR 1728
FINCH LANE, PID #13- 117 -24 -13 -0018.
ORDINANCE NO. 05 -2014: ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A OF THE MOUND
CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO ELECTRIC AND GAS FRANCHISE FEES.
G. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -34: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN
ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY.
H. Cancel Special Meeting Workshop for the purpose of receiving a concept plan for
assisted living facility by Trident Development scheduled for May 20, 2014 at 7:00 p.m.
Set a Special Meeting Workshop for the purpose of receiving Developer Day Summary
for June 17, 2014 at 6:30 p.m.
6. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda.
None were offered.
7. Kari Kamrath and Robert Winge, County Assessors, with 2014 Hennepin County
Assessment and Board of Appeal and Equalization Report from May 7, 2014.
Kari Kamrath, Senior Appraiser for Mound stated the 2014 open book meeting was held on May
7" and 6 residents attended. Kamrath stated property sales for the period October 2012
through September 2013 were analyzed to come up with the payable 2015 values. Kamrath
relayed the following increases by property type: residential 15.8% on average, with some
neighborhoods as high as 20 — 30 %, residential lakeshore 5.3 %, commercial and industrial
0.7 %, apartments 3 %, condominiums 17.9 %, townhomes 9.9 %, duplexes 16.9°/x, and zero lot
lines 10 %. The overall gross value increase was 10.7 %. To date, the assessor's office has
received 62 value notice calls and has completed 11 appointments.
Kamrath stated if the property tax increased more than 12% and $100, it may qualify for a
special property tax refund up to $1,000. The general property tax refund is income based.
Both forms can be found on the Minnesota Department of Revenue website and should be
included in the income tax filing for 2015.
8. Jim Reuper, Phelps Bay Captain for the Lake Minnetonka Association, requesting
contributions for the treatment of Phelps Bay.
Josh Leddy, project manager for the LMA, and Jim Reuper, Phelps Bay Captain, explained that
the Phelps Bay treatment area will be expanded in 2014 to east Phelps Bay and they are
requesting additional funding. Mayor Hanus stated that funding requests should be received in
spring for the following budget year and that the City does not have excess funds. Leddy stated
the LMA is requesting an additional $3,000 for east Phelps Bay.
Leddy stated that a Lake Improvement District (LID) is in the process of being created for St.
Alban's Bay. A LID establishes a Board of Directors comprised of bay residents, and a majority
of the bay residents could determine what level of treatment/service they want and then the
-1029-
Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014
costs would be assessed to the properties on that bay. Discussion ensued and Leddy stated he
would need to obtain more information on the subject from Rob Roy who is heading up that
initiative.
9. Rita Trapp, Consultant with Hoisinqton- Koegler, Inc., requesting discussion on
Rita Trapp stated the applicant has requested City Council review the sketch plan and that it is
not required. This review does not require a public hearing, but Trapp noted neighbors are
present in the audience and written comments received from them have been included for
Council consideration. Trapp summarized the proposed subdivision and stated all lots meet the
zoning requirements for R2, which is a minimum of 6,000 square feet. Trapp stated the
Planning Commission did not identify any concerns in their review.
Mayor asked if cul -de -sac is standard size and Trapp stated that the engineer and fire chief felt
it was sufficient but that she will need to look at the code. Salazar asked whether or not the
detached deck is on an unimproved road. Trapp said there is a 2 foot setback required for a
detached deck from the side. Trapp said Staff needs to research if a permit was pulled at the
time of deck construction. Trapp said vacating a right of way is somewhat problematic.
Kent Friedrichsen, 5913 Fairfield Road, stated he is the applicant, resident, and a real estate
broker. Friedrichsen responded to some of the concerns raised by the council and neighbors.
Hanus stated he would make some preliminary general comments. First, he feels the Lot 3
explanation seemed to make sense and second, he does not have any serious issues with the
concept being proposed.
Salazar stated he did a site visit and found it odd new homes would be built behind existing
homes. Hanus stated similar cul -de -sacs exist all over city. Friedrichsen stated that the new
owner of 5921 Fairfield Road /Lot 4 was a first time homeowner and that Friedrichsen purposely
moved the structure on lot 5 as far back as possible to minimize impacts. Friedrichsen went on
to address other concerns noted by neighbors.
Gillispie asked what the proposed timeline was for completing all of the structures. Friedrichsen
stated all would be completed as soon as possible. Friedrichsen commented on the sizes of the
proposed houses and lot sizes and stated both are similar to houses and lots in the area.
Friedrichsen stated the trees taken out were dead and that all utilities will be underground.
Hanson stated it is a benefit that the structures will be further back on the lot to allow for parking
since there is no street parking. The street extension will be 24 feet wide which is the same as
the existing width of Fairfield Road. Friedrichsen stated that he may move into one of the new
houses and that he has lived in Mound for 18 years.
The Mayor invited people in the audience forward if they would like to speak.
Jordan Korczak, 5921 Fairfield Road /Lot 4, stated that he did have a realtor when he purchased
the home and that this proposal was not known to him at the time of purchase. Hanus stated
that everybody's property rights have to be considered.
Matt Van Nelson, 2925 Meadow Lane, stated he owns the new house. Nelson stated he
wanted to voice a concern about disruptions to the nice quiet community with three houses
being built at once and that the applicant may not be fairly addressing the comments from
-1030-
Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014
neighbors. Nelson stated construction and traffic is a concern and will reduce the safety and
privacy aspects that are currently enjoyed.
Hanus stated that often comments received are not relevant to discussion and that it is rare that
proposed changes are well received by area residents.
Jeff Lundgren, 5924 Idlewood, is behind Lot 5, and is not happy to lose privacy in the rear of his
lot.
Friedrichsen stated that he has worked with planners with the goal of getting final plat approval
at the same time as the preliminary plat to save money and be proactive. Friedrichsen stated
the state requirement is 45 feet for the cul -de -sac. Smith stated she looked it up and that the
Mound code is 50 feet. Hanus stated that since there is no parking on the street, he would be
concerned that there would be adequate parking on the property.
Smith stated that this is being treated as a three -lot major subdivision. Smith stated usually 3
lots is a minor subdivision but this is a major subdivision because of the public utility work
involved. According to code, a major subdivision requires approval of a preliminary and final
plat. A Public Hearing will be held for the approval of the preliminary plat at the Planning
Commission and City Council levels including the required notifications. The final plat approval
is just at the Council level. Smith said a development agreement will be executed with the plans
and specs subject to review by the City Engineer, Public Works, Fire Department, and the City
Planner. Smith stated a letter of credit will be required for the public improvements.
Friedrichsen stated that funding is not a concern.
10. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk[Treasurer, requesting discussion /action
Pausche summarized the information contained in the public packet and stated that the
applications and Orono police department background reports had been provided separately to
the Council as decision makers. Pausche stated the State relies on the local authority to do the
background check and to determine if issuing the liquor license is in the public interest.
Pausche stated the Conditional Use Permit for the premises was included in the packet and that
is where conditions are typically contained.
Mayor Hanus asked if additional conditions may be proposed. Manderschied stated that the
Council can impose additional conditions. Hanus cautioned the Council when discussing the
information in background information. Manderschied stated two laws apply, the data privacy
act and open meeting law that does allow for discussing private data so long as it is relevant to
the decision.
Gesch asked if the CUP conditions have been met. Smith stated those items will be required
before the resolution is released for recording and that progress is being made.
Salazar asked the applicant how start-up costs would be covered. Hanus stated he, too,
wondered about finances and then he came to the conclusion that he did not feel it was his
place to require proof. Paul Boyum, applicant, stated he has made arrangements with the food
vendors and the bank to cover start-up expenses. Salazar asked about hiring staff and Boyum
stated some are in place. Salazar asked where the applicants are living Boyum stated Golden
Valley.
-1031-
Mound City Council Minutes —May 13, 2014
Hanus proposed the following language be added as a clarification: 'This license will be subject
to revocation or non - renewal if the City Council determines that this liquor establishment is a
nuisance or requires an abnormal or undue burden on law enforcement or the community."
Hanus said that although there are no automatic disqualifiers triggered per the Police Chief, he
feels this additional language is still needed. Hanus asked how conditions on approval are
incorporated into the license. Hanus relayed a potential scenario where this additional language
might be needed.
Manderschied stated that City Code Section 6.53 provides a specific process for suspension or
revocation of a license and that she has concerns about the use of "abnormal' and "undue
burden" in the proposed language because it can be tricky to prosecute, whereas public
nuisance is defined. Gesch worried that the proposed language is not measurable. Hanus
asked what in addition to State Statute could be used as an enforcement tool. Manderschied
referred to the Public Nuisance Ordinance and also referred to State Statute regarding over
serving or providing service to minors. Hanus asked to address the undue burden on law
enforcement if that were to occur. Gillispie asked about the license renewal language and if that
would address it.
Manderschied stated State Statute and City Code states that the licensee is responsible for the
conduct on the premises, specifically Section 6.52. Manderschied said she is not concerned
about placing a condition, just the language that was proposed. Hanson stated that police
reports and calls for service are considered during the renewal. Manderschied stated the City
Council has broad discretion at issuance and during renewal and stated that a liquor license is a
privilege and not a right. Manderschied stated that courts are likely to uphold any reasonable
and non - arbitrary reason.
Hanus asked Manderschied to confirm that the public nuisance laws are applicable.
Manderschied stated that they are applicable if the activity was related to liquor and occurred on
the premises.
Hanus stated that although he is not sure what the exact plans are, it appears the applicant
plans to try new things and he likes that.
Wegscheid stated that he drove by and did a walk through and that Mr. Boyum has done a
fabulous job with the building. Wegscheid stated he is comfortable with the codes in place and
supports approval of the license.
Salazar stated he has given this a lot of thought and has many questions. Salazar stated a
liquor license is a great privilege, and even though he is pro business, he is concerned about
public safety and welfare. Even though he has trepidations, he is feeling better after hearing the
other Council Members. Salazar stated that he believes there is demand for this service and if it
is properly maintained and delivered, it will be successful.
Hanus stated that he recently asked the Orono School Resource Officer about police
calls /activity at The Narrows in Navarre and he was surprised to hear that there was very little.
Salazar asked about DUls and Hanus stated that this type of business comes with inherent risks
and that he hopes that they control it well and avoid the need for a police presence. Discussion
ensued about server training and Pausche stated that it is in the business plan and is typically
required by the liquor liability insurance carrier. Hanson stated that the required 50/50 ratio for
food and liquor receipts will help keep the balance.
-1032-
Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014
MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve an intoxicating on -sale liquor license
and a Sunday liquor license for Stephani Boyum and Paul Boyum for Cattails Kitchen N
Cocktails. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
11.
Pausche stated that there was gambling, including pull tabs and paddle wheel, at the former
VFW and that the State of Minnesota requires a resolution by the Council to approve the permit.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Gillispie, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -35: RESOLUTION APPROVING PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION
FOR GAMBLING AT CATTAILS KITCHEN N COCKTAILS, LLC.
Mound.
Hanson stated issues arose last summer and that the Orono Police Department has asked for
more enforceable language in the City Code. Hanson stated this proposed language is to
address conducting of business on public lands, including up to 600 feet into the water, and also
prohibits businesses from citing the address of City property as the business address in
advertising. Hanson stated the intent is to keep these places primarily for the public enjoyment,
although Staff will be working on language that allows the permitting of certain types of
businesses that are deemed to be in the public interest.
Gillispie asked how the farmers markets would be impacted and Hanson stated that the one that
takes place on public land is permitted. Discussion ensued about how Staff will know when
business is being conducted on public land and Hanson stated the City received many reports
from the public last year as well as the police officers know to look for it.
At 9:00 pm, the meeting was recessed to change the recording medium. The meeting was
resumed at 9:05 pm.
Wegscheid asked Hanson to describe the types of calls that were received and Hanson gave
examples. Salazar said the Council needs to consider the liability issues on city property.
Hanson stated that insurance is required as part of any permitting process. Gillispie asked
about any signage issues and Hanson stated that it is primarily when they use their vehicles as
advertising bulletin boards. Wegscheid asked what the repercussion is for violating the
ordinance and Manderschied stated violators could be charged with a misdemeanor. The City,
as owner, can authorize use through permits and /or rental agreements. Hanson gave the
example of Tommy's Trolly in Excelsior. Discussion ensued about the use of "immediately' in
the resolution with regards to the delivery of goods, products, and services and Manderschied
stated she used it in order to address vendors who may be there with the City's authorization.
Hanus stated when the Bay Rentals' CUP was approved last year the Council was specific that
the rental needed to take place on their private property and that he would use public property
only to launch the watercraft.
-1033-
Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014
Salazar asked what would prevent someone from conducting a business out of their garage and
Hanus stated that is allowed subject to the exterior storage unit, signs, and other language in
the code that would apply.
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to adopt the following ordinance, as amended. All
voted in favor. Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 06- 2014 -: ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 50 OF THE MOUND CITY
CODE AS IT RELATES TO PARKS AND RECREATION PROHIBITING PRIVATE BUSINESS
ON PUBLIC LANDS OR WATERS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF MOUND.
13.
At 9:25 p.m. Mayor Hanus announced that the Council would go into closed session for the
purpose of performing the City Manager's performance evaluation. City Manager Hanson
stated she wished to conduct her performance evaluation in a closed session.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to close the session for the purpose of conducting
the City Manager performance review. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Hanus read the
applicable State Statute language that allows the Council to close the meeting.
Mayor Hanus reconvened the meeting at 11:28 pm. Mayor Hanus announced that the Council
had completed the performance evaluation of the City Manager.
14. Information /Miscellaneous
A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager:
Gesch thanked the owners of Carbone's for following through on their promise to provide
alternative transportation for their patrons. Hanson announced that on Saturday, May
17, the Farmer's Market will open, and the Meals for Wheels and Our Lady of the Lake
Blast fundraisers will take place.
B. Minutes: Planning Commission — March 4, 2014
C. Reports: Mound Fire Department Fire Commission Meeting Agenda — May 7, 2014
Strathmore's Who's Who Honors Kandis Hanson
D. Correspondence: Letter from Hennepin County on Community Development Block
Grant program —April 18, 2014
Email from Chief Farniok on Successful Explorers Competition —
May 1, 2014
Letter from Westonka Historical Society requesting volunteers
Letter from Mediacom on channel lineup — May 1, 2104
Minnetrista /Mound Clean Up Day — May 10, 2014
Hennepin County Hazardous Waste Collection Events
15. Adiourn
MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Salazar, to adjourn at 11:30 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
Mayor Mark Hanus
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
-1034-
JATLIllid-
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT
Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals.
Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability
of the police in maintaining order.
NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS
Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park area.
10() '— u �r t
PERMIT FEE: $300/DAY TO $600/DAY* 100— i 1 L�Q 1 [fib h ti j i CU
DAMAGE DEPOSIT: $500 TO $1000/DAY*
*Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff
upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements.
Date(s) of Usei;U
Used I tj 01jleir PI&(a
Intended Use `Tb 0 it Je TO Y1 �GG( zg .7 -,;hp
Expected Attendance
com01Wt(
Representative's Name j T w LI i-6)n
Ceti.
Telephone No. Beyttme: (& l7, qto - j2A(y Work: lG 52) 40J -5-D4 j
E- Mail: . ([ f{ M e) M iV)tle4Nl Drivers License Number:
' �Lyt GLI- �- ��ii267 -S»
e artmental Approval
pt'-`erk
Police Dept.
4,3D Speaa1 Gen+
`{/ryn w Cheer i 5+
Date of Single Dance
License Year
Annual Dance
LICENSE #
CITY OF MOUND
2415 WILSHIRE BLVD.
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
PUBLIC DANCE/LIVE MUSIC PERMIT APPLICATION
EVENT:
LOCATION OF DANCEILIVE MUSIC: W D iyy r- F f W
TYPE OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC: L
f
TIME PERIOD OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC _,5a+yr -Aa y 7/7--((� , 1 .00 a•M �V h cwj
(HOURS PERMITTED: Mon -Sat: 8pm- 12:30am- Sunday: pm- 11:30pm)
CHAIRPERSON OR ,L
APPLICANT: -1 i IM LI f n TITLE: eCeGuiIVP D(f o L M Il'4t"W611"
ADDRESS: Hc5Tq V1(v� Aj(1 120" ADDRESS: �r�Cisl�� Wlr� 33�
E -MAIL 1 (t'M . i i t& (V) M QU1 e h)1(io( , WL. Vnn.0 5
HOME PHONE #: / o _g, HOME PHONE #: 14
WORK PHONE #: NG7-) �AO I - �N3 WORK PHONE #: loll
Date
Applicant's Signature
1036-
Department Approval/Denial
(Submit memo if denied)
Approved Denied
Police Dept.
Adm.
Fire Dept.
CITY OF MOUND��,
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT
Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals.
Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability
of the police in maintaining order.
NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS.
Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up up of the park area.
PERMIT FEE: $300 /DAY TO $600/DAY* (l . (J
DAMAGE DEPOSIT: $500 TO $1000/DAY* F
*Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff
upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements.
Date(s) of Use e � - 1
Area to be Used C- ('J-t 1 { r
Time Frame "ZOISM,
Intended Use We I'a A
Expected Attendance SC
Organization
Represei
Address
Telephone No. Home:
ex-
Work: lj G O yj— /,55q
/
Drivers License Number l / �GC�I �/ a ���1� �(X J 1 t 77
De artmental Approval
1tv Clerk
5q.1
Police Dept.
-1037-
Afinnescia
�3.VTi6'ENf Ci
NSTA7�1nE5WFtE5
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES
Region 3 Fisheries
1200 Warner Road, St Paul MN 55106
Phone: 651- 259 -5831 /Fax: 651- 772 -7974
PERMIT TO CONDUCT FISHING TOURNAMENT
Permission is hereby granted to the individual and /or organization named below to conduct a fishing
tournament under the provisions of this permit, pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes and Rules.
Name of Tournament:
Permit Number:
Fishers of Men Minnesota Team Division
14- 314 -T24
Name of Permittee:
Telephone Number (Include Area Code):
Dave & Tammy Shade
612- 280 -1559
Address (No. & Street, RFD, Box No., City, State, Zip Code):
Hennepin
130 Shasta Circle West Chanhassen, MN 55317
Public Access to be used (See #5 on reverse side.):
Name of Sponsor (Organization, Firm or Individual):
Public Access
Fishers of Men National Tournament Trail
Name of Waters:
Acres:
County:
Division of Waters I.D. Number:
Minnetonka
14,729
Hennepin
27 -0133
Public Access to be used (See #5 on reverse side.):
Public Access
Tournament Species:
Largemouth & Smallmouth Bass
Weigh -in Stations:
Catch and Release Tournament: X Yes / _ No
Centerview Park, Mound
Estimated No. of Entrants: Boats:
Beginning Date:
Term Hating Date:
100 50
August 23, 2014
August 23, 2014
Daily Fishing Hours
Entry Fee per Individual
Estimated Total Prize Value
7:00 A.M. - 3:00 P.M.
$150
$4,500
Additional Stipulations /Conditions: See Reverse Side.
*The permittee shall submit a report on forms provided, to the Regional Fisheries Manager identified
below, within 30 days after completion of the contest.
Regional Ofce -Copy Distribution:
• St. Paul Fisheries Office
• Regional Fisheries Manager
• Area Fisheries Supervisor
• Area Trails & Waterways Supervisor
I Area Conservation Officer
Regional Fisheries Man.- er' Si nature Date
DNR Region 3 Fisheries Manager
1200 Warner Road
St Paul Mn 55106 -6793
®. /pat'' Consulting Engineers & Surveyors
" 7 k 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172
ft Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805
`�_� "'� www,bolton- menk.com
May 20, 2014
Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE: Emergency Retaining Wall Replacement
5097 Three Points Boulevard
Request Payment of Invoice
Dear Ms. Hanson:
Attached is the Invoice from Advanced Wall Structures, Inc. for the full replacement of the
existing two - tiered limestone block wall that failed on or about April 281i. Quotes from four
contractors were received on May 2 1d with the low quote being submitted by Advanced Wall
Structures, Inc., Prior Lake, in the amount of $37,514.00.
The new wall is a two- tiered modular block wall conforming to the City's standard type and
color. The invoiced amount is based on the actual amount of modular block installed. In addition,
the split rail fence, bid at $1,064.00 was not installed as part of this work.
We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the
amount of $33,210.00 to Advanced Wall Structures, Inc.
Sincerely,
BOLTON & /M�� EDDNK, INC.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
Mound City Engineer
cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works
Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance
-1039-
5650 Starview Lane
Prior Lake, MN 55372
952 - 447 -7300 Cell 612-387-4767
Invoice Submitted To: City of Mound / Bolton -Menk 05/15/14
ATTN: Dan Faulkmer, P. E.
danfa@bolton- menk.com
Job Name: 5097 Three Points
Job Location: Mound, MN
RETAINING WALL
5097 Three Points:
1,176 SF Anchor Block Wall installed @ $17.50 PSF $26,460.00
Removal of old wall $ 6,750.00
No fence required $ .00
THANK YOU!
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $33,210.00
-1040-
Executive Summary
TO: Mound City Council and Staff
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner
DATE: May 20, 2014
SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 14 -04 Front Yard Setback Variance Request
REQUEST SUMMARY
The applicant has requested a 9.5 foot front yard setback variance to facilitate the construction
of a new home with attached garage. The property, which is currently vacant, is located at the
intersection of Birch Lane, Red Oak Road, and Dutch Lare in the Mound Terrace Addition just
south of Dutch Lake. The applicant is proposing an approximately 2,000 square foot, two-story
home with three bedrooms and two bathrooms and an attached three car garage.
With frontage on three streets, the applicant has requested that the frontage along Birch Lane
be designated as the front. Staff is supportive of the designation of Birch Lane as the front of the
lot. The designation will be similar to the other homes along Birch Lane further to the east. In
addition, while Dutch Lane is the portion of the lot with the smallest frontage, the intersection of
the three roadways in that location significantly limits the buildable area on that side of the lot
and would make movement in and out of the lot challenging and potentialy unsafe.
Mound City Code requires that lots which abut more than one street provide a front yard setback
on each street. This provision imposes a 30 foot setback on the property on three sides. It is for
this reason that the applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the setback requirement on one
of the sides down to 20.5 feet.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their May6, 2014 meeting and recommended
on a 5 -1 -1 vote for approval. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference.
RECOMMENDATION
As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, Staff has
prepared the attached resolution for your consideration.
12 -1041 -Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
RESOLUTION APPROVING FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE
FOR 6260 BIRCH LANE
PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -04
PID NO. 14- 117 -24 -32 -0040
WHEREAS, the applicant, Loren Pellett, has submitted a request for a variance to allow
a 9.5 foot front yard setback variance to facilitate the construction of a new home with
attached garage. The property, which is currently vacant, has an irregular shape and
street frontage on three sides; and
WHEREAS, the property is zoned R -1 single- family residential. Section 129 -100 of the
City Code contains the regulations for the R -1 district; and
WHEREAS, Sec. 129 -100 (b) (2) (c) requires a minimum front setback of 30 feet; and
WHEREAS, the property is located at the intersection of Birch Lane, Red Oak Road,
and Dutch Lane in the Mound Terrace Addition. The applicant is proposing an
approximately 2,000 square foot, two -story home with three bedrooms and two
bathrooms and an attached three car garage; and
WHEREAS, with frontage on three streets, the applicant has requested that the frontage
along Birch Lane be designated as the front. According to Section 129 -2 of the City
Code, the following is the definition of the front lot line:
Lot line, front, means that boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated
public street. In the case of a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a
public street or as otherwise designated by the Community Development Director
based on the practical front yard of the property as determined by such factors as
the existing or proposed building configuration of the property and taking into
consideration the characteristics of the surrounding properties. If the dimensions
of a corner lot are equal, the front line shall be designated by the owner and filed
with the city. For purpose of this chapter, a lot shall have only one front setback.
; and
WHEREAS, Section 129 -197 (e) of the Mound City Code requires that lots which abut
more than one street shall provide the required front yards along every street; and
1042-
WHEREAS, the following includes the proposed dimensions for the subject lot:
; and
WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances
which is provided below:
Variance
9.5 feet
(a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not
mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes
practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use
variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the
following circumstances exist:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined
in City Code Sub. 129 -2.
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special
privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or
buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the
same zone.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the
practical difficulty.
(4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance
are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
and
WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as
follows:
Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that:
(i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the zoning ordinance;
-1043-
Required
Proposed
Lot Area
10, 000 sq. ft.
13,148 sq, ft.
Lot Width
60 feet
180 feet
Front Yard (Birch Lane)
30 feet
20.5 feet
Rear Yard (Red Oak Road)
30 feet
30 feet
Side Yard (Dutch Lane)
30 feet
85+ feet
Side Yard (east)
10 feet
10 feet
Hardcover (maximum 4091o)
5,259 sq. ft.
2,724 sq. ft.
; and
WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances
which is provided below:
Variance
9.5 feet
(a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not
mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes
practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use
variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the
following circumstances exist:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined
in City Code Sub. 129 -2.
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special
privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or
buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the
same zone.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the
practical difficulty.
(4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance
are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
and
WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as
follows:
Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that:
(i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the zoning ordinance;
-1043-
(ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property
including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not
created by the landowner; and
(iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical
difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for
solar energy systems.
and
WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are
contained in the Planning Commission report dated April 30, 2014 and the submitted
application and supporting materials from the applicant; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, the variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its May 6, 2014
meeting; and
WHEREAS, a majority of the Planning Commission voted to recommend Council
approval of the variance, as recommended by Staff; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its May 27, 2014 meeting
and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable
manner; and
WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of
fact:
1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met.
2. The property's irregular shape and frontage on three streets pose practical
difficulties as 30 foot setbacks are required for each frontage located along a
street.
3. The proposed front yard setback is still more than 20 feet and maintains a similar
setback as adjacent properties.
4. The reduction in the proposed front yard setback reduces the amount of
hardcover required for the site.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does
hereby approve the variance with the following conditions:
1. Hardcover for the site shall not exceed 40% as allowed by the R -1 Zoning
District.
2. All structures shall be constructed so that the lowest floor is at or above the
Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation.
-1044-
3. Building height of the new structure shall be less than 35 feet as required by City
Code.
4. Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining sedimentation and erosion control
on the site during construction and until such time as ground cover is fully
established. Applicant will be responsible for all required permitting from the
MCWD for the project, including but not limited to, procurement of an erosion
control permit, as well as the City's standard conditions that are required for new
construction projects.
5. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land
use request.
6. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included
as part of this action in the event the expansion permit application is approved.
Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building
permit application.
8. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public
agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required
information prior to building permit issuance.
9. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin
County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for
recording until all conditions have been met.
10. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at
Hennepin County is provided.
11. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the
land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient
amount is on file with the City.
12. Payment of all involved fees that are required with the building permit for new
home construction on a vacant lot, including but not limited to, Trunk Water Area
Charge, Trunk Sewer Area Charge, Water Connection Fee, Sewer Connection
Fee and MCES SAC fee. Fees to be collected shall be the amounts in effect at
the time the building permit is issued.
The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property:
Lot 8, Block 7, "MOUND TERRACE" according to the record plat thereof
Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of May 2014.
Mark Hanus, Mayor
-1045-
MINUTE EXCERPTS
MAY 6, 2014
Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin
Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist & Pete
Wiechert. Staff present: Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander.
Others present: Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd); Art &
Barb King (2964 Pelican Point Cir); Loren Pellet (5660 Sunnybrook Cir); Matt Van Nelson (2925
Meadow La); Grant Johnson (6347 Bay Ridge Rd)
BOARD OF APPEALS
Planning Case No. 14 -04 Variance
6260 Birch Lane Applicant: Loren Pellett
Trapp introduced the front setback variance request. The lot is irregular in shape and currently
vacant. A 2000 SF house is proposed and shown on the survey. Birch Lane is designated as front
by request of the owner. Staff supports Birch' Lane as front because of safety issues on Dutch
Lane and the character of the neighborhood. A front setback requirement of 30 feet is difficult
so a 20.5 setback is being requested. The required 30 foot setback on the three frontages along
streets is greater than similar properties in the area, limits backyard use and increases
hardcover due to the longer driveway. The survey shows a deck but building plans do not. Staff
is recommending approval with standard requirements and findings of fact.
Retterath noted that the dimension off Birch Lane seems to be measured differently. Hennepin
County shows a difference in the location of the front lot lines.
Loren Pellet — 5660 Sunnybrook Cir —After the property was staked to the original drawing and
you walked the property and saw how long the driveway and compared it to the currently
proposed setback it's obvious how much better it was. it flows with the neighborhood much
better and improves the hardcover.
Discussion
Retterath walked site; it's very open to west. He's struggling with the rationale of the difficulty
of putting a house on this parcel. it would technically put this house closer to the curb than the
adjacent house. He doesn't see a practical difficulty and will not support it. The deck could be
put in a different place.
Retterath stated that the applicant actually demonstrated that a house could be built on this
property. The 30 foot setback it is buildable. It's not a practical difficulty.
Trapp said that Staff felt 30' on 3 sides was excessive and more than what most properties have
to deal with.
Smieja asked why 30 feet for corner lot. Trapp said R1 front setback is 30 feet. This one is
unusual because it's triangular with 3 fronts.
Retterath still comes back to the city granting a practical difficulty case because the owner
wants it a certain way. Trapp noted that the standard is practical difficulty. which means
something reasonable cannot be done within the standard.
Pellett disagrees that there is no difficulty. There's extreme difficulty. The area is mostly 20 -25
foot setbacks. The backyard is really close to street and quality of the project for the
neighborhood is impacted.
Smieja confirmed that if this was zoned R2 this wouldn't be a problem. Trapp agreed but noted
the surrounding properties are R1A not R2. The R1A areas to the north have 20 foot fronts as
well as much of the R1 homes to the east.
Wegscheid supports the variance. Practical difficulty isn't a defined mathematical equation. It
differs from person to person.
MOTION by Wegscheid, second by Stone, to accept staff recommendation. MOTION carried.
Voting for: Stone, Gawtry, Goode, Penner, and Wegscheid. Voting against: Retterath. Smieja
abstained.
-1047-
nAAL
y T • r
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PLANNING CASE NO.
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
ZONING:
Planning Commission
Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
April 30, 2014
14 -04
Front Yard Setback Variance
Loren Pellett on behalf of property owner Novak Fleck Inc.
6260 Birch Lane (PID NO. 14- 117 -24 -32 -0040)
Low Density Residential
R -1 Single Family Residential
BACKGROUND
The applicant has requested a 9.5 foot front yard setback variance to facilitate the construction
of a new home with attached garage. The property, which is currently vacant, has an irregular
shape and street frontage on three sides.
SITE INFORMATION
The property is located at the intersection of Birch Lane, Red Oak Road, and Dutch Lane in the
Mound Terrace Addition. The property is located just south of Dutch Lake and will have views
of the lake. The applicant is proposing an approximately 2,000 square foot, two -story home
with three bedrooms and two bathrooms and an attached three car garage.
With frontage on three streets, the applicant has requested that the frontage along Birch Lane
be designated as the front. According to Section 129 -2 of the City Code, the following is the
definition of the front lot line:
Lot line, front, means that boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public
street. In the case of a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street or
as otherwise designated by the Community Development Director based on the practical
front yard of the property as determined by such factors as the existing or proposed
building configuration of the property and taking into consideration the characteristics
of the surrounding properties. If the dimensions of a corner lot are equal, the front line
1M.
6260 Birch Lane Variance PC Report
shall be designated by the owner and filed with the city. For purpose of this chapter, a lot
shall have only one front setback.
Staff is supportive of the designation of Birch Lane as the front of the lot. The designation will
be similar to the other homes along Birch Lane further to the east. In addition, while Dutch
Lane is the portion of the lot with the smallest frontage, the intersection of the three roadways
in that location significantly limits the buildable area on that side of the lot and would make
movement in and out of the lot challenging and potentially unsafe.
Section 129 -197 (e) of the Mound City Code requires that lots which abut more than one street
shall provide the required front yards along every street. The City Code has a provision which
allows a reduction to setback requirements, based on lot width, for lots of record. However,
given that this lot is more than 81 feet wide, the required lot setback along each street is still
30 feet.
The following are the proposed dimensions for the application:
4 9 01 44 II&ME iGPf J
REVIEW PROCEDURE
City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a
landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property
owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined
in City Code Sub. 129 -2.
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands,
structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to
property within the same zone.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the
practical difficulty.
-1049 -
May 1, 2014 Page 2
Required
Proposed /Existing Variance
Lot Area
10,000 sq. ft.
13,148 sq. ft.
Lot Width
60 feet
180 feet
Front Yard (Birch Lane)
30 feet
20.5 feet 9.5 feet
Rear Yard (Red Oak Road)
30 feet
30 feet -
Side Yard (Dutch Lane)
30 feet
85+ feet -
Side Yard (east)
10 feet
10 feet -
Hardcover (maximum 40 %)
5,259 sq. ft.
2,724 sq. ft. -
REVIEW PROCEDURE
City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a
landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property
owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined
in City Code Sub. 129 -2.
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands,
structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to
property within the same zone.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the
practical difficulty.
-1049 -
May 1, 2014 Page 2
6260 Birch lane Variance PC Report
(4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance
are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows:
Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that:
(i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the zoning ordinance;
(ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property
including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not
created by the landowner; and
(iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical
difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems.
60 -DAY PROCESS
The variance application was submitted on April 1, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State
Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use
request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota
Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of
application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be April 2, 2014.
CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved departments,
consultants and agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized
below:
Melissa Manderschied, I do not have any concerns with this application as it is a uniquely
City Attorney shaped parcel. Staff to confirm with applicant that the
application was signed by authorized signatory. Confirm
assignment of 6260 Birch for subject property.
Dan Faulkner, City If approved, significant erosion control measures should be
Engineer required during home construction.
Tom Dietrich Based on these preliminary plans, the property owner would be
required to apply for an erosion control permit with the District.
All information relevant to the permit application can be found
online but if the applicant needs any help, please refer them to
me.
-1050 -
May 1, 2014 Page 3
6260 Birch Lane Variance PC Report
Correy Farniok, Orono No issues.
Police Chief
Scott Qualle, Building I have no comments.
Official
DISCUSSION
• The applicant has provided an alternative survey that shows the placement of the home if
all setbacks are met. As shown, this placement will limit the rear yard area and require a
longer driveway.
• As noted in the narrative, the angle of the street means that while the corner of the house
is setback 20.5 from the closest point, the distance from the garage straight south to the
street will be 26.5 feet.
• Planning Commissioners are advised that the applicant narrative contains some errors in
describing setback requirements for adjacent properties. The properties located to the
north across Red Oak Lane, adjacent to Dutch Lake, have 20 foot front yard setbacks
because they are zoned R -1A not because they are Lakeshore lots. The applicant also states
that lots of records in the R -1 District are allowed a 20 foot setback. Section 129 -100 (3)
does allow a front yard setback reduction for lots of record. The reduction is based on a
lot's depth. Those that have a lot depth of less than 60 feet can be reduced to 20 feet,
while those lots between 61 and 80 feet deep are allowed to be reduced to 24 feet.
Properties with a lot depth of more than 81 feet must maintain the required 30 foot
setback. Staff's determination is that this lot's depth is more than 81 feet and so 30 foot
setbacks are required.
• The applicant has proposed hardcover totaling 2,724 square feet, which is 22 %. This is well
below the lot of record requirement of 40 %.
• The survey shows a future conforming deck on the north elevation abutting Red Oak Road.
It was not shown on the building plans however.
• Section 113 -53 (b) (4) states that all structures shall be constructed so that the lowest floor
elevation, including basement or crawl space, is at or above the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation. The RFPE for Dutch Lake is 942.0 feet. The lowest floor elevation
shown for the proposed new house is shown at 968.9 feet.
• According to the applicant, the proposed height of the home is just over 30 feet, which
would meet the R -1 Zoning District maximum of 35 feet. Staff is verifying the calculations
provided and will ensure the height meets zoning code requirements during the building
permit process.
• Per code, minimum allowed driveway width is 10 feet; maximum is 24 feet. Side setbacks of
1 feet are required. Driveways are required to be hard surfaced.
-1051 -
May 1, 2014 Page 4
6260 Birch Lane Variance PC Report
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
In accordance with City Code Sec. 129 -39 (a), Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of a 9.5 foot front yard variance as requested by the applicant subject tc
the following conditions:
1. Hardcover for the site shall not exceed 40% as allowed by the R -1 Zoning District,
2. All structures shall be constructed so that the lowest floor is at or above the
Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation.
3. Building height of the new structure shall be less than 35 feet as required by City Code.
4. Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining sedimentation and erosion control on the
site during construction and until such time as ground cover is fully established.
Applicant will be responsible all required permitting from MCWD for the project,
including but not limited to, procurement of an erosion control permit, as well as the
City's standard conditions that are required for new construction projects.
5. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use
request.
6. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as
part of this action in the event the expansion permit application is approved.
7. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit
application.
8. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency
permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to
building permit issuance.
9. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County.
The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all
conditions have been met.
10. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at
Hennepin County is provided.
11. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use
application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with
the City.
-1052-
May 1, 2014 Page 5
6260 Birch Lane Variance PC Report
12, Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules
related to wetlands, floodplain and erosion control are in effect; also others. Applicant
is advised that these rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as rules
regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by th e
Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. The applicant is requested to contact the
MCWD regarding the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to
undertake the proposed project. Any future building permit release will be conditioned
upon the applicant providing receipt of the MCWD permit(s) issuance (as applicable)
and /or receipt of written confirmation from the MCWD that no permit(s) is needed for
the project.
13. Payment of all involved fees that are required with the building permit for new home
construction on a vacant lot including but not limited to Trunk Water Area Charge,
Trunk Water Area Charge, Water Connection Fee, Sewer Connection Fee and MCES SAC
fee. Fees to be collected shall be the amounts in effect at the time the building permit
is issued.
In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered.
1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met.
2. The property's irregular shape and frontage on three streets pose practical difficulties
as 30 foot setbacks are required for each frontage located along a street.
3. The proposed front yard setback is still more than 20 feet and maintains a similar
setback as adjacent properties.
4. The reduction in the proposed front yard setback reduces the amount of hardcover
required for the site.
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it is anticipated that
the variance request will be reviewed at an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time,
possible dates are Tuesday, May 13, 2014 or Tuesday, May 27, 2014.
1053-
May 1, 2014 Page 6
Planning Commission Date &t ?Y 6A ) 1V / Case No. -6L
City Council Date f � 2A ae,7
91ST-Tlh -yo - 3o]Jwiiff ru•tU
OTHER
THAN
OWNER)
1. Has an
'OZO
4
Name'4�reA Rojle -7L�- Email
tn/
PhoneHome9S ` Y262 Work Q 5c!%L2/162 Fax a�2 - -�'
ever been made for zoning,
use permit, or
for this property? Yes ( ) Noy). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s)
and provide copies of resolutions.
2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
Variance information
(10/2112013) Page 4 of 6 -1054-
j J Y
Case N ®.
3. Do the existing structures comply wi h all a, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning
district in which it is located? Yes If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason
for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.):
1
?
SETBACKS:
i. q t' I'll C'F"r,/�
REQUIRED
REQUESTED
(or existing)
Front Yard:
( N (VE W
ft.
Side Yard:
(N 4 W)
f C-D ft.
10 ft.
Side Yard:
(N S E
3(2 ft.
ft.
Rear Yard:
& E W)
ft.
ft.
Lakeside:
(N S E W)
ft.
ft.
(NSEW)
ft.
ft.
Street Frontage:
�� ft.
ft.
VARIANCE
ft
ft
ft
5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the
uses permitted in that zoning district?
N too narrow
( ) too small
f4 too shallow
( ) topography
( ) drainage
(shape
( ) soil
( ) existing situation
() other: specify
Please describe:
SAS FJ✓ Ty f/ci �`
Variance Information
(10/2112013) Page 5 of 6 -1055-
SAS FJ✓ Ty f/ci �`
Variance Information
(10/2112013) Page 5 of 6 -1055-
Case No.
6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in
the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), NoA, ff yea, Wien:
7, Was the practical difficulty created by any other human-made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes( ), No X), if yes, explain:
f3. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property
described in -
this patttion? .Yes W), No( ). if no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
s.
l certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be -
submitted herewith are true and accurate, l acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information
provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premixes described in this application by any authorized
Official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintainfag and removing such
notices as-may be required by law. _
riOwner's Slonatur®
A,apticert's ftnafur(&6
Vadanoe fntoenawn
f 10,7111018) Page 6 of 6
-1056-
Loren Pellett
5660 Sunnybrook Circle
Mound, MN, 55364
03/31/2014
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Blvd,
Mound, MN, 55364
Dear Planning Commission and City Council.
The reason for my variance is to build a quality house that fits into the neighborhood well. The house
was staked and after being staked I noticed it is not in the optimal location. The house being moved
forward would flow considerable better with the neighbors properties than it does under the setback
regulations in the zoning district. Also moving forward would reduce approximately 300' of hardcover.
The hardship for the lot is the shape of the lot. Birch lane comes at angle to the property.
Using a 30' front yard setback puts the house at 37' from the road on left corner straight to the road and
58' from the road on right side of the house causing a longer driveway and using lots of hard cover on a
small lot. Pulling the house forward to 20.5 would put the house at 26.5 straight to the road on the left
side of the house and 47' to the road on the right side of the house.
The next door neighbor's house to the left is 21' from the road. If the house where moved to a 20'
setback it would line up better with their house. Also the houses across the street are Lake Properties so
their setbacks are all at 20'. Moving the house forward provides abetter quality backyard and gives
better spacing from houses across the street. The lot is not very deep so at 30' front yard setback there
is only 30' rear yard. Moving the house forward there is 41.44 setback from the street in the year yard.
The zoning district also allows 20' setbacks on lots of records. Corner lots 50-80 are allowed a 20'
setback; Lots with 60' or less width are allowed a 20' setback. Lake Lots are allowed a 20' setback
This lot has 163' of frontage but the lot depth for the majority of the lot would not have enough
buildable space so the lot effectively is not wider than 80'.
Attached is two surveys one with meeting all setbacks which will not allow for a rear deck. The other
which is surveyed to the requested variance. It is obvious which one flows better in the neighborhood.
Thank you for considering the Variance.
Sincerely /
Loren Pellett
-1057-
HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS
(IMPERVIOUS SURFACE O w a
OWNER'S NAME: V0 / .� � l�� _ - Ci A
LOT AREA -' � `% F SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ......... ...............................
LOT AREA / f SQ- FT. x 40 °le = (for Lots of Record) _�__.._.. _«.__..._._. .—C� �� U
" Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129 -385 (see
back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official.
LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT
HOUSE
Ll L) x = I � C D
TOTAL HOUSE ........................... ....................... !i i
DETACHED BUILDINGS x
(GARAGEtSHED) -
x =
TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS .............................
DRIVEWAY, PARKING ., Ca x� = I C
AREAS, SIDEWALKS,
ETC. x .
j 4, X I , t- i1,(r�7
• 1t - r
DECKS Open decks (114" min. ' " ` X /
Opening between boards) with a
pervious surface under are not x =
counted as hardcover.
x =
TOTALDECK— ....................................................
x =
X
TOTAL OTHER ..................... ...............................
UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ..................................... ...............................
PREPARED
Revised 1 /10 kLIPP P R 12074
Mii
I
I
0 0
0
u) N W O N
_ r11
c s o o m a o 3 0
W O a m N i v m UI
V Z J O
?
® O ❑ O O Q
O
d Z 05
0000
001
aup))so3
Y
!1 W
li
Y
Q
rr�� rtr z
F-a 4 W
H
WOz�M °nom a
- Z Q 9 wB•
d r
o 0
O W
FO- C9 J W w
O m
m
m m rn
P
r
It
�i
O
W
04
0
a
v
p 4
v
i0 m ti
� o y
m� o
o m N O)
W °
oll E N W
N
� x p
O f 00
O O W W W
O O 2 D fL
ZZ Q Q Q
m
m" m anSo ^mb
r/iV}7Om TDU
- IUOy-
N
4
DRIVE
B °
hoN DOM
+'ry
off_,95'84
as
� Ory
0
6R .BAZ
O W
„a. 5£.
o
Y
� a
O
1
c
awm
I •�'
m" m anSo ^mb
r/iV}7Om TDU
- IUOy-
4
p
� Ory
0
ET
c
Y
� a
O
a
c
�a
N
East cc
H-LAND SlJR E 1 I rG9 1 .A.©
F.B. NO.NO
Xxxx
.6
-
1 rD Y
LAND SURVEYORS
' 10"
SCALE 1"= 30'
976.9
Proposed Top of Block
11947 Idaho Ave. N.
®
Denotes Iron Monument Found
4}q
TNH
139"N6'49'
Champlin, Minnesota 55316
O
Denotes Spikes Set
W S E 976.5
Proposed Garage Floor
PHONE (763) 323 -1300
❑
Denotes Wood Hub Set
968 9
36" T
FAX (763) 323 -7035
C
For Excavation Only
Proposed Lowest Floor
hylandsurvey @qwestoffice.net
x000.0
Denotes Existing Elevation
S
Type of Building -
�✓ur�P�l?r}� �pl'�jfjrtt�F
=
Denotes Proposed Elevation
963.430
FULL BASEMENT
Sanitary MH
-4-
Denotes Surface Drainage
Lookout 871.4
NOVAK FLECK
Property
Located In Part Of
963.43
RED
OAK ROAD
SW 1 A,
Sec. 14Twp. 117 R. 24.
saaimryMH
Note: 12"
of Snow on the Site
wyD4.JD
East cc
NE Corner 149.9
of Lot 6 East
967.71
za' r
.6
-
968.3fi - O
24",T' N)
' 10"
CM
O
12x12
.0
965.84
6
.06
nt
................ ..................
15.00 15.0°
TNH
139"N6'49'
_.
X80 . i
968.86
CR=
971,18
966.4 966.47
36" T
C
w o
966.53 a Storm MH
-.
=
963.430
Sanitary MH
138.80
East cc
NE Corner 149.9
of Lot 6 East
967.71
za' r
5��.
-
968.3fi - O
24",T' N)
152.1
CM
O
12x12
.0
DECK 1
97a.2'i
968.95 i
24° T !
................ ..................
15.00 15.0°
i
X80 . i
2' Cant. c
19
T
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
972,1
10.0 i
Ca zo Note: Height of Building - 28' -4"
- -- Note: Deck is impervious
N O 0
- ° AREA: 13,148 Square Feet
114 �2 AREA OF HOUSE: 1,551 Square Feet
a I
o , AREA OF DRIVE: 819 Square Feet
974.48
`.��ry �� 974. 974.3 74.113 ,� 974.75
7 976 h r___ 976.5 .1-
CJ 6� V� j GARAGE
90 I' m m
a �T HOUSE
TOB 1975.90 1975.57 .60
7.7
9]59 G
PP r'T
9]5.48
975.21
LOT 8, BLOCK 7, "MOUND TERRACE"
PP Overhead Wves Tp 562s in\ ll (O
976.62
h
This survey is certified only to the above named person or persons
and not to subsequent owners, mortgages or title insurers. \
The only easements shown are from plats of record of information provided by client.
All building dimensions and floor elevations must be verified by client.
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under
my direct supervision, and that 1 am a duly Registered Land
Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed:
Surveyed by us this 20TH day of MARCH 20 14 Milton E. Hyland, Minn. Reg. No. 20262
Rev. March 24, 2014 Rev. March 27, 2014 Rev. April 24, 2014 ttev aprin au, zu1q
Tc
967.24
697 Spike In Retaining 10
NE Corner 149.9
of Lot 6 East
NE Corner
of Lot 3
9 174
-
_ -- East
CM
O
J
O w
0
0
971,18
36" T
w o
972,1
10.0 i
Ca zo Note: Height of Building - 28' -4"
- -- Note: Deck is impervious
N O 0
- ° AREA: 13,148 Square Feet
114 �2 AREA OF HOUSE: 1,551 Square Feet
a I
o , AREA OF DRIVE: 819 Square Feet
974.48
`.��ry �� 974. 974.3 74.113 ,� 974.75
7 976 h r___ 976.5 .1-
CJ 6� V� j GARAGE
90 I' m m
a �T HOUSE
TOB 1975.90 1975.57 .60
7.7
9]59 G
PP r'T
9]5.48
975.21
LOT 8, BLOCK 7, "MOUND TERRACE"
PP Overhead Wves Tp 562s in\ ll (O
976.62
h
This survey is certified only to the above named person or persons
and not to subsequent owners, mortgages or title insurers. \
The only easements shown are from plats of record of information provided by client.
All building dimensions and floor elevations must be verified by client.
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under
my direct supervision, and that 1 am a duly Registered Land
Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed:
Surveyed by us this 20TH day of MARCH 20 14 Milton E. Hyland, Minn. Reg. No. 20262
Rev. March 24, 2014 Rev. March 27, 2014 Rev. April 24, 2014 ttev aprin au, zu1q
976.9 Proposed Top of Block
976.5 proposed Garage Floor
968.9 Proposed Lowest Floor
Type of Building —
FULL BASEMENT
Walkout
96a4s RED OAK ROAD
Sanitary MH
Tc
965.84
LOT 8, BLOCK 7, "MOUND TERRACE"
rvey is certified only to the above named person or persons
t to subsequent owners, mortgages or title insurers.
ly easements shown are from plats of record of Information provided by client.
NOVAK FLECK
TNH ® 10.00
968.66 "
PjfD °4$39 .4
Denotes
47
O
Tc
Spikes S,
Stam 0
Storm M03
Denotes
Wood Hu
S.nR<.ry MH
LOT 8, BLOCK 7, "MOUND TERRACE"
rvey is certified only to the above named person or persons
t to subsequent owners, mortgages or title insurers.
ly easements shown are from plats of record of Information provided by client.
NOVAK FLECK
__— NE comer
100,00 V NE Corner 149.9 of Lot 3
Eost of Lot 6 East e
CM O
Jy O n
mJ p
�N
0
i
1
974.75
! t r <
� HOUSE .. .
Tors
975. ®a -.
975.21
\ v
-1061-
bL AI-t t
Denotes
Iron Mon
O
Denotes
Spikes S,
0
Denotes
Wood Hu
For Excavation
Or
x000.0
Denotes
Existing
n
Denotes
Proposec
Denotes
Surface
Property
Located in Part 0
SW 1 Z4.
Sec. 14
Twp. 11
Note: 12"
of Snow on th
__— NE comer
100,00 V NE Corner 149.9 of Lot 3
Eost of Lot 6 East e
CM O
Jy O n
mJ p
�N
0
i
1
974.75
! t r <
� HOUSE .. .
Tors
975. ®a -.
975.21
\ v
-1061-
-1062-
r -rte ffill
r-
ik
1
I7
31
0 1;.I.4�i1ill�i/ Ti r'YI
I'
JS
e VV
�GO1aG. °.d.,.a
r
TM coaa+eciloea
i
®o Iow taro. rio.
`
d
FNIMAN
-1063-
0
-1064-
-1065-
Executive Summary
TO: Mound City Council and Staff
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner
DATE: May 20, 2014
SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 14 -05 Minor Subdivision and Planning Case No. 14 -06
Variances
REQUEST SUMMARY
The applicant is proposing a 3 lot minor subdivision of the 20,265 square foot property at 2201
Centerview Lane. The property currently includes an existing single family home that is
anticipated to remain after the subdivision. Variance approvals are being concurrently requested
as the 6.9 foot side setback for the existing house on Parcel C becomes non - conforming when
the setback changes from 6 feet for a lot of record to 10 feet for a non lot of record. A variance
is also being requested to address the minimum lot depth requirement as it applies to Parcel A.
Given the configuration of Parcel A, it is unable to meet the 80 foot lot depth requirement. Staff
notes that at 7,706 square feet, the parcel exceeds the 6,000 square foot minimum size
requirement. In addition, portions of the lot due meet the 80 foot lot depth. The applicant has
demonstrated that a house and garage can be placed on the lotdespite given its shape.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW ANDRECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their May6, 2014 meeting and recommended
unanimously for approval of the requests. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your
reference.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
City policy requires the payment of the Trunk Area Water Charge and Trunk Area Sewer Charge
prior to release of the resolution for recording. However, on a case -by -case basis, the Council
has approved an alternate schedule to allow for these fees to to be collected as part of the
building permit, if requested. Members are advised that the applicant has requested payment of
these fees with the future building permits.
RECOMMENDATION
As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approvalof the requests, Staff has
prepared the attached resolutions for your consideration.
12.1066 -third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
RESOLUTION NO 14-
RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION
FOR THE PROPERTY AT 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE
PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -05
PID # 13- 117 -24 -31 -0040
WHEREAS, the applicants, Art and Barb King, submitted a request for a minor
subdivision to create three buildable parcels from the existing lots of record that make up
the property at 2201 Centerview Lane; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R -2 (Single and Two Family
Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of
the City Code; and
WHEREAS, the following table shows the minimum requirements for the R -2 District for
a single - family lot and evaluation of the proposed new lots' conformity with the
regulations:
and
WHEREAS, the proposed new lots meet the requirements of the R -2 District for a non -
lot of record with the exception of the side setback for the existing house, which is
currently 6.9 feet, and the minimum lot depth for Parcel A; and
WHEREAS, the applicants submitted a variance request for these conditions; and
-1067-
WHEREAS, the 20,265 square foot property currently includes an existing single family
home that was constructed in 1940 and fronts Centerview Lane. The property also has
frontage on Noble Lane. The owners, who purchased the property in April 2013,
indicated that the existing house would be retained on proposed Parcel C, if a
subdivision was undertaken. The applicants also expressed interest in constructing a
detached accessory structure on proposed Parcel C along with a future addition to
connect the existing house with the proposed detached garage. Both the proposed
detached garage and future addition are shown on the submitted subdivision survey and
are shown in conforming locations; and
WHEREAS, whenever a subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner, or
authorized agent, shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance
with the procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 121; and
WHEREAS, the proposed lot arrangement qualifies as a minor subdivision as described
in Sec. 121 -35 (1) of the City Code as it contains three or fewer residential lots and does
not involve the construction of public facilities or public improvements; and
WHEREAS, lots approved as part of a minor subdivision, including those with existing
structures, are no longer eligible for "lot of record" status and are required to meet the
same standards as new lots; and
WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are
contained in the Planning Commission report dated April 30, 2014 and the submitted
application and supporting materials from the applicant; and
WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the minor subdivision application and recommended
approval with conditions; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the minor subdivision application at its
May 6, 2014 meeting and recommended approval with conditions;
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the minor subdivision request at its May 27, 2014
meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a
reasonable manner; and
WHEREAS, in granting approval of the minor subdivision request, the City Council
hereby makes the following findings of fact:
1. The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The subject lots have frontage on improved public streets and municipal
utilities are available.
3. The applicants have demonstrated that the proposed lot arrangement can
accommodate the construction of new single - family homes with
conforming setbacks and hardcover.
I.S
4. The two, new proposed single- family residential lots will not alter the
essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on
adjoining property.
5. The proposed new lots meet the standards for a non -lot of record with the
exception of the existing side setback for the existing house, which is 6.9
feet and is not changing as a result of the subdivision.
6. Lot depth for Parcel A, as proposed, is reasonable as the City's
definition is difficult to apply in this case due to its proposed
shape /configuration. The lot size for proposed Parcel A is 7706 sq. ft.
which exceeds the 6000 sq. ft. requirement. Portions of proposed
Parcel A meet or exceed the 80 foot minimum lot depth requirement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound that
the minor subdivision requested by the applicants is hereby approved with the following
conditions:
The variance application is approved.
Driveways must be hard surfaced in accordance with City Code regulations.
Minimum driveway width is 10 feet; maximum width is 24 feet.
3. Drainage shall not be directed to neighboring properties.
4. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction,
including but not limited to, installation of the water service, sewer service and
small utilities, shall be the responsibility of the permit holder.
5. As part of the City's approval of the subdivision, the dedication of public
drainage and utility easements, to be determined by the Public Works Director,
will be required and shall be submitted in a form to allow for recording at
Hennepin County, and shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City,
prior to recording.
Applicants shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all public agency
permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit
issuance.
Applicants are advised that there are historic indian burial mounds and /or
earthwork sites in and around the City of Mound. While many of the mounds
have been severely impacted by development over the years, the mounds do,
however, receive protection under state law; and penalties are imposed for
unauthorized disturbance of mounds. The City maintains some general
information about possible sites in an inventory of the "Earthwork/Mound /Burial
Areas" contained on the Cultural Resources Map in the Mound Comprehensive
Plan and in surveys of the burial sites from Hill and Lewis in 1911 but the
completeness or accuracy of this information is unknown. Additional information
may be obtained through the Minnesota State Archeologist. Any formal
investigation of a site, including a determination of whether a mound or burial
area exists on a subject site, is the responsibility of the property owner or
developer. The issuance of permits by the City to do work on a site does not
relieve the owner or the developer of that responsibility.
1069-
8. Payment of park dedication fees as required by Sec. 121 of the City Code prior to
the release of the resolution for recording. The amount due is $1,100.00 for
each of the two additional lots for a total of $2,200.00.
9, Payment of Trunk Area Water Charges for the two (2) additional lots at the time
of building permit unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. The
amount due is $4,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the
building permit.
10. Payment of Trunk Area Sewer Charges for the two (2) additional lots at the time
of bullding permit. The amount due is $4,000.00 or the current amount in
effect at the time of the building permit.
11. Payment of sewer connection fee of $240.00 and water connection fee of
$240.00 for the new two (2) additional lots shall be required at the time of
building permit issuance.
12. Payment of the MCES SAC charge for each of the two (2) new lots shall be
required at the time of building permit issuance. The amount due shall be the
current amount in effect at the time.
13. As applicable, if the subdivision requires the construction of utility improvements,
these activities must be constructed and installed prior to the release of the
resolution or submittal of a contractor's estimate, which shall be subject to review
and acceptance by the Public Works Director (or designee) and submitted of an
cash escrow in the amount of 125 percent of the contractor's estimate.
The minor subdivision is approved for the property described on the attached Exhibit A .
Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of May 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Mark Hanus, Mayor
1 1
RESOLUTION NO 14-
RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES
FOR PROPERTY AT 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE
PLANNING CASE NO. 14-06
PID # 13- 117 -24 -31 -0040
WHEREAS, the applicants, Art and Barb King, submitted a request for a minor
subdivision to create three buildable parcels from the existing lots of record that make up
the property at 2201 Centerview Lane; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R -2 (Single and Two Family
Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of
the City Code; and
WHEREAS, the following table shows the minimum requirements for the R -2 District for
a single - family lot and evaluation of the proposed new lots' conformity with the
regulations:
; and
WHEREAS, the proposed new lots meet the requirements of the R -2 District for a non -
lot of record with the exception of the side setback for the existing house, which is
currently 6.9 feet, and the minimum lot depth for Parcel A; and
WHEREAS, variance approval was requested to address these two conditions; and
-1071-
WHEREAS, the 20,265 square foot property currently includes an existing single family
home that was constructed in 1940 and fronts Centerview Lane. The property also has
frontage on Noble Lane. The owners, who purchased the property in April 2013,
indicated that the existing house would be retained on proposed Parcel C, if a
subdivision was undertaken. The applicants also expressed interest in constructing a
detached accessory structure on proposed Parcel C along with a future addition to
connect the existing house with the proposed detached garage. Both the proposed
detached garage and future addition are shown on the submitted subdivision survey and
are shown in conforming locations; and
WHEREAS, the proposed 3 -lot arrangement qualified as a minor subdivision as
described in Sec. 121 -35 (1) of the City Code as it contains three or fewer residential lots
and does not involve the construction of public facilities or public improvements; and
WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances
which is provided below:
(a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not
mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes
practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use
variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the
following circumstances exist:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined
in City Code Sub. 129 -2.
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special
privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or
buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the
same zone.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the
practical difficulty.
(4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance
are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
; and
WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as
follows:
Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that:
(i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the zoning ordinance;
1072-
(ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property
including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not
created by the landowner; and
(iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical
difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for
solar energy systems.
; and
WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are
contained in the Planning Commission report dated April 30, 2014 and the submitted
application and supporting materials from the applicant; and
WHEREAS, lots approved as part of a minor subdivision, including those with existing
structures, are no longer eligible for "lot of record" status and are required to meet the
same standards as new lots; and
WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the variance request and recommended approval with
conditions; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the variance request at its May 6, 2014
meeting and recommended approval with conditions; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its May 27, 2014 meeting
and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable
manner; and
WHEREAS, in granting approval of the variance request, the City Council hereby makes
the following findings of fact:
1. The criteria in Sec. 129 -39 (a) are being met.
2. The proposed new lots meet the standards for a non -lot of record with the
exception of the existing side setback for the existing house, which is 6.9
feet and not changing as a result of the subdivision and lot depth.
3. A variance for lot depth for Parcel A is reasonable as the City's definition
is difficult to apply due to its proposed shape /configuration. The lot size
for proposed Parcel A is 7706 sq. ft. which exceeds the 6000 sq. ft.
requirement. Portions of proposed Parcel A meet or exceed the 80 foot
minimum lot depth requirement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does
hereby approve the variance request with the following conditions:
The minor subdivision is approved.
Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land
use request.
-1073-
3. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included
as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved.
4. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building
permit application.
5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public
agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required
information prior to building permit issuance.
6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin
County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for
recording until all applicable conditions have been met.
No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at
Hennepin County is provided.
8. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the
variance application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient
amount is on file with the City.
The variances are approved for the property described on the attached Exhibit A .
Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of May 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Mark Hanus, Mayor
-1074-
MINUTE EXCERPTS
MAY 6, 2014
Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin
Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist & Pete
Wiechert. Staff present: Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander.
Others present: Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd); Art &
Barb King (2964 Pelican Point Cir); Loren Pellet (5660 Sunnybrook Cir); Matt Van Nelson (2925
Meadow La); Grant Johnson (6347 Bay Ridge Rd)
BOARD OF APPEALS
Planning Case No. 14 -05 3 Lot Minor Subdivision &Variance
2201 Centerview Lane Applicant: Art and ;Barb "'King
Trapp introduced the case consisting of two variances: 1) existing home to property edge on
the south and 2) parcel A lot depth. Trapp noted that the lot depth meets standards on the
north side but not on the south due to the shape of the lot. The existing home is planned to be
kept and the applicant is planning to construct a detached garage and possibly a connector
breezeway. Property is guided low density residential and zoned R2. The lot of record
designation disappears once the property has been subdivided. Parcel "A" is an irregularly
shaped lot with inadequate lot depth on one side. Staff has determined that it makes more
sense to process this deficiency as a variance. There are no floodplain or wetland issues. Park
dedication will be required at $1100 per lot. Preliminary review triggers no watershed
requirement until building permit issuance. Water and sewer will have to be stubbed to the
property line. Hardcover is very close to 30% on all three parcels and house pads are
demonstrated. The list of conditions is pretty standard and findings of fact are included.
Art King — 2964 Pelican Point Cir —Water connection points seem to be there. House size could
be increased with the use of permeable pavers.
Discussion
Retterath supports the project. It's put together pretty nicely. The utility issues will get sorted
out. Wegscheid agreed with Retterath.
MOTION by Goode, second by Gawtry, to recommend approval to include recommendations
and findings of Staff. MOTION carried unanimously.
-1075-
r
_.. GITY C7f' h40UNa__
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner
DATE: April 30, 2014
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 6, 2014
OWNERS: Art and Barb King
APPLICANT: Art King
REQUEST: Minor Subdivision and Variance - 2201 Centerview Lane
CASE NUMBER: 14 -01 and 14 -06
PROPERTY ID: 13- 117 -24 -31 -0040
ZONING: R -2 Single and Two Family Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential
The applicant is proposing a 3 lot minor subdivision of the property at 2201 Centerview Lane
and is requesting review by the Planning Commission. Variance approval is also being
requested as the 6.9 foot side setback for the existing house on Parcel C becomes non-
conforming when the setback changes from 6 feet for a lot of record to 10 feet for a non -lot of
record and to address the minimum lot depth requirement as it applies to Parcel A.
Planning Commission members may recall that a concept /sketch plan for this property was
previously reviewed by the Planning Commission at its the November 5, 2013 meeting and a
"modified" concept /sketch plan was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its March 4, 2014
meeting.
-1076-
SITE INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND
The 20,265 square foot property currently includes an existing single family home that was
constructed in 1940 and fronts Centerview Lane. The property also has frontage on Noble
Lane. The owner, who purchased the property in April 2013, has indicated that the existing
house would be retained on parcel C if a subdivision was undertaken. The applicant has also
expressed interest in constructing a detached accessory structure on parcel C along with a
future addition to connect the existing house with the proposed detached garage. Both the
proposed detached garage and future addition are shown on the submitted subdivision survey.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
Subdivision Whenever a subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner, or authorized
agent, shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance with the
procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 121. The proposed lot arrangement qualifies as a
minor subdivision as described in Sec. 121 -35 (1) of the City Code as it contain three or fewer
residential lots and does not involve the construction of public facilities or public
improvements.
Variance. City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief
to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the
property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined
in City Code Sub. 129 -2.
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands,
structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to
property within the same zone.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the
practical difficulty.
(4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance
are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows:
Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that:
(i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the zoning ordinance;
-1077-
(ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including
unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the
landowner; and
(iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical
difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar
energy systems.
TIMELINES FOR ACTION
Minnesota statutes require approval or denial of a subdivision request by an agency within 120
days. The minor subdivision application was submitted on April 1, 2014. Minnesota Statutes
645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the
120 -day rule for the subdivision application and was determined to be April 2, 2014. The City's
deadline for action on the minor subdivision request is on or around July 30, 2014.
Minnesota Statutes 15.99 requires approval or denial of a zoning request within 60 -days unless
an extension is executed. The variance application was received on April 21, 2014. Minnesota
Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of
application of the 60 -day rule for land use applications in accordance with Minnesota Statutes
15.99 and was determined to be April 22, 2014. Therefore, the City's deadline for action on
the variance application, unless an extension is executed, is on or around June 20, 2014.
LAND USE
Comprehensive Plan —The City's current Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Low Density
Residential, which allows for single - family detached and attached housing types within the
density range of 1 to 6 units per acre. Density is computed area wide as opposed to an
individual site. The proposed subdivision meets the Comprehensive Plan guidance.
Zoning —The subject property is located in the R -2 (Single and Two Family Residential) zoning
district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of the City Code. It should be
noted that lots approved as part of a minor subdivision, including those with existing structures,
are no longer eligible for "lot of record" status and must meet the same standards as new lots.
The following table shows the minimum requirements for the R -2 District for a single - family lot.
Based on Staff review of the proposed lot configuration, the proposed new lots meet the
requirements with the exception of the side setback for the existing house which is currently
6.9 feet. A variance has been requested as the side setback for a non -lot of record is 10 feet.
1
Note: Some dimensions are approximate and were determined by Staff.
Floodplain. Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 23 (Floodplain) in
the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be floodplain on the subject property.
Per code, all new structures must meet or exceed the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or
be three feet above the OHWH of wetland, as applicable. This will be a condition of approval for
the subdivision.
Wetlands . Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.4 (Wetlands) from
the 2030 Mound Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be wetlands on the subject
property.
Park Land Dedication. Dedication of park land and /or payment of fees in lieu of land
dedication is required by Sec. 121 -121 of the City Code. If a future subdivision is approved, Staff
recommends the submittal of a cash payment in lieu of park dedication. For minor subdivisions,
the approved 2014 fee is $1,100.00 per lot. As one credit would be granted for the existing lot,
$2,200.00 in park dedication fees would be required for a proposed 3 -lot subdivision. Park
dedication fees will be collected prior to the release of the resolution for recording.
-1079-
INFRASTRUCTURE
Storm Water. Stormwater permitting is under the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District (MCWD) following regulatory authority turn back to the District by the
Mound City Council which took place in August, 2011.
MCES Sewer Area Charge (SAC). The 2014 MCES fee for a SAC unit is $2,485.00. MCES charge
will be collected at the time of building permit issuance for the two (2) lots and shall be the
amount in effect at the time.
City Water /Sewer Trunk Area Charges.
The 2014 trunk water fee is $2,000.00 per lot and the 2014 trunk sewer charge is $2,000.00 per
lot. Payment of trunk water and trunk sewer charges for each of the two (2) additional lots will
be collected prior to release of the resolution. Applicant is advised that a request can be made
to the Council to request these fees be paid at time of building permit issuance for the future
new homes similar to the MCES SAC charges; however, the amount would then be the fee in
effect at that time.
City Water /Sewer Connection Fees. The 2014 sewer connection fee is $240.00 per lot and the
2014 water connection fee is $240.00 for each of the two (2) additional lots. This will be
collected at the time of building permit issuance and shall be the amounts in effect at the time.
CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Copies of the sketch plan application and supporting materials were forwarded to involved
departments, consultants and agencies for review and comment. Comments received to date
have been summarized below:
Public Works Director Carlton Moore
Building Official Scott Qualle
Orono Police Chief Correy Farniok
Finance Director Catherine Pausche
There are utility services available to the existing
house only. There are no water or sewer services
stubbed to the proposed new lots.
I have no comment.
No issues.
I have no comment.
City Engineer Dan Faulkner Everything seems to be in order; no comments.
t:1
MCWD District Rep. Tom Dietrich
Xcel Energy Rep. Lynn Longfield
DISCUSSION
After preliminary review, no District rules will be
triggered by sub - division of the parcel at 2201
Centerview Lane in Mound. However, the individual
property owners of the newly subdivided lots will be
subject to the District's Erosion Control rule for any
proposed homes with disturbance exceeding 5,000
square feet or 50 cubic yards of excavation. If you have
any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact
me.
See attached email dated 4 -14 -2014.
1. The property currently has lot of record status and therefore meets setback
requirements. However, once the minor subdivision occurs all three lots will be subject
to the R -2 lot standards for new lots or non -lot of record. This will result in the lot with
the existing home to have a nonconforming side yard setback (south) of 6.9 feet. A
variance has been submitted by the applicant for this condition as part of the
subdivision process. Staff is supportive of this variance request given that it is an existing
condition resulting from the 1940 placement of the home on the property rather than a
variance being created by the subdivision process itself.
2. One of the discussion items during the Planning Commission's review of the
concept /sketch plans was the lot depth for proposed Parcel A (Lot 14 & 15) and how it is
determined based on the configuration of the lot. The definition for lot depth is the
mean horizontal distance between the front and rear property lines. Using the
information provided in the submitted plan and application of the lot depth definition,
per code, the lot depth for Parcel A is approximately 71 feet which is less than the
required 80 foot minimum. However, it is important to note that portions of the north
side of the lot meet the lot depth. The application of the definition to this lot is difficult
due to its configuration. It is also important to note that the Parcel A is the largest of
the 3 proposed lots. Members may recall that the Planning Commission's discussion at
the March 2014 meeting was that lot depth determination for this lot, according to the
code, was difficult due to its shape. At the direction of Staff, the applicant has applied
for a variance to lot depth for this parcel. Given the size of the lot and its orientation
Staff is supportive of this variance.
-1081-
Permitting for wetlands (with the exception of WCA boundary determination),
stormwater, floodplain alteration, erosion control and shoreline alteration is the
responsibility of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) effective September
2011,
4. The applicant has confirmed that there are no bank mortgages or liens on the subject
property.
5. Applicant is advised that the hardcover for the subject lots is very close to the 30
percent maximum.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the requested minor subdivision and variance for the property at
2201 Centerview Lane subject to the following conditions:
1. Driveways must be hard surfaced in accordance with City Code regulations. Minimum
driveway width is 10 feet; maximum width is 24 feet.
2. Drainage shall not be directed to neighboring properties.
3. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction, including but
not limited to, installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be
the responsibility of the permit holder.
4. As part of the City's approval of the subdivision, the dedication of public drainage and
utility easements, to be determined by the Public Works Director, will be required and
shall be submitted in a form to allow for recording at Hennepin County, and shall be
subject to review and acceptance by the City, prior to recording.
5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all public agency permits
including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance.
6. Applicant is advised that there are historic indian burial mounds and /or earthwork sites
in and around the City of Mound. While many of the mounds have been severely
impacted by development over the years, the mounds do, however, receive protection
under state law; and penalties are imposed for unauthorized disturbance of
mounds. The City maintains some general information about possible sites in an
inventory of the "Earthwork /Mound /Burial Areas' contained on the Cultural Resources
Map in the Mound Comprehensive Plan and in surveys of the burial sites from Hill and
Lewis in 1911 but the completeness of accuracy of this information is unknown.
Additional information may be obtained through the Minnesota State Archeologist.
Any formal investigation of a site, including a determination of whether a mound
or burial area exists on a subject site, is the responsibility of the property owner or
-1082-
developer. The issuance of permits by the City to do work on a site does not relieve the owner
or the developer of that responsibility.
7. Payment of park dedication fees as required by Sec. 121 of the City Code prior to the release
of the resolution for recording. The amount due is $1,100.00 for each of the two (2) new lots
($2200.00 total.)
8. Payment of Trunk Area Water Charges for each of the two (2) additional lots prior to the release
of the resolution unless an alternate schedule is requested and approved by the Council. The
amount due is 4,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit, if
an alternate schedule is requested and is approved by the Council.
9 Payment of Trunk Area Sewer Charges for each of the two (2) additional lots prior to the release
of the resolution unless an alternate schedule requested and is approved by the Council. The
amount due is $4,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit if
an alternate schedule is requested and approved by the Council.
10. Payment of sewer connection fee of $240.00 and water connection fee of $240.00 for each of
the new two (2) additional lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance.
11. Payment of the MCES SAC charge for each of the two (2) new lots shall be required at the time
of building permit issuance. The amount due shall be the current amount in effect at the time.
12. As applicable, if the subdivision requires the construction of utility improvements, these
activities must be constructed and installed prior to the release of the resolution or submittal of
a contractor's estimate, which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works
Director (or designee) and submitted of an cash escrow in the amount of 125 percent of the
contractor's estimate.
In recommending approval of the minor subdivision and variance, Staff offers the following
findings:
1. The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The subject lots have frontage on improved public streets and municipal utilities are
available.
3. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed lot arrangement can accommodate
the construction of new single - family homes with conforming setbacks and hardcover.
4. The two new proposed single - family residential lots will not alter the essential character
of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on adjoining property.
5. The criteria in Sec. 129 -39 (a) are being met.
6. The proposed new lots meet the standards for a non -lot of record with the exception of
the existing side setback for the existing house which is 6.9 and is not changing as a
result of the subdivision.
I:
Variance for lot depth for Parcel A is reasonable as the City's definition is difficult to
apply due to its proposed shape /configuration. The lot size for proposed Parcel A is
7,706 sq. ft. which exceeds the 6,000 sq. ft. requirement. Portions of the proposed
parcel meet or exceed the 80 foot minimum lot depth requirement. The applicant has
demonstrated that a house and garage can be placed on the lot given its shape.
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
In the event a recommendation(s) is received from the Planning Commission, it is anticipated
that the minor subdivision and variance requests will be reviewed at an upcoming City Council
meeting. At this time, possible dates are Tuesday, May 13, 2014 or Tuesday, May 27, 2014.
1:I
APR 1 2044
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone 952 - 472 -0600 FAX 952- 472 -0620
i
Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application.
PLANNING COMM. DATE CASE NO.
CITY COUNCIL DATE:
Please type or print clearly
EXISTING Subject Address 1-20 1 CIENTEPZVIE.W LAME
PROPERTY i'A ok
LEGAL Lot 14,IW�Ir_�ock_ Subdivision 1'1BEp+wA LttNGou/ Bspl ITHIIJ
DESCRIPTION PID# 13-111-7-q-91-0040 Zoning: R7 R1A a R3 87 B2 B3 (Circle one)
APPLICANT
The applicant is:
owner other _
Email Aer.
Vt��@ itilF�'TEC.N.cop\
Name Ara-r
sX/ ""
Vtt b
Address �Zq
(a i pEl°t.C}tN
Pbl t rT
c j 9-GLE- Moor-+§o
MN
4
Phone Home Gf?-760
-846-1
Work (nib-
-707--t2q®i Fax
& -- 76*2-���
OWNER
Name k{ r
1' BARB
l N L
Email lk2t I3AEL
kLtiG (,P
C
(if other than
applicant)
Address
A-na Pra
ai4&bV .
Phone Home
Work
Fax
SURVEYOR/ Name 5MVEAf V. t{E Email 5i5CNO-19 PR£wtrEZ- 5VRI(Eq. �6
ENGINEER Address F8 QDX 234. VIOToai,*,t ywx) ss38fo
Phone Office Cell iS2 °31?3-0Yf"7 Fax
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property?
( ) yes, fro no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions.
Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case.
I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted
herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am responsible
for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the
premi escribed in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of
posti g, m 'tai ' g
77 such notices as may be required by law.
l
Applicants Si nature Date ( 1114
Owner's Signature Date
Minor Subdivision Information
(1A 8/2013) Page 4 of 4
-1085-
L-1 Z 126 1 t,f
VARIANCE �w
D APPLICATION
2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364
Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620
Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application.
Planning Commission Date IYIAk l 6-rN Case No.
City Council Date prim 17 TO
Please t it nr nrint leaihiv
SUBJECT
Address "2.2-01 C9 4 tti M l tA)
i._.A W F
ca p
Lot t 1 °� 1 M DuS�,D &2L91,
uf}`rT� j' Block
PROPERTY
LEGAL
DESC.
Subdivisio7onA�t2v`RAiM Lit,tol- Ii ,AApi-no;J
LA- yYFsof PA�2-�'
PID# 1.7 =11"1 "2-q'3i -06°r0
Zoning: Rt R1A0 R3 81 B2 B3 (Circle one)
PROPERTY
Name JMIRT- a i3 .A-e-15 `((*t(cz,
Email 1Aer • Kr fU @T{tl' ( (aC
OWNER
71��
Address 2564 42�C& Tblf ✓T
C I I/ujoiwQ• 00 553b
Phone Home h2--7W-'3q5-7 Work Fax (bQ_= 112-12-6 i
APPLICANT
Name
Email
(IF OTHER
THAN
Address
OWNER)
Phone Home Work
Fax
1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conortlonai use permit, or otner zoning proceeure
for this property? Yes ( ) No If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s)
and provide copies of resolutio s.
2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
�crgDltflslar� ©� i�rrs V��s �xisTi�+� sr¢�-ru�e� t�aN-
C O N 1502 U t IJ 6 N O%_ ' 1,31F .1 6 A � Lv I LL F3, CON-550N fo C�
AND 14AT CIT11 Vacs 'tHC L_aT 'DEPTH Gds
PZT-
variance Information G n ,r n
(10/2112013) Page 4 of 6 �}U THE- '�(��1�1� PS?1 -H f f? PPrRCEA,
ILI I 1, I AC10u86 ��� AS PMt P0sF-f� }
Case No.
3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning
district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (x). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason
for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.):
_'51 OF-
VOID
REQUIRED
OD -J W051 SLOE lS eVoN-Cbr./t'C ti(--
�
YGfIiC J'�t13C7
CC>31�J�.
SETBACKS:
REQUIRED
REQUESTED
VARIANCE
(or existing)
Front Yard:
( N (a W)
20 ft.
2 5t l ft.
-
ft.
Side Yard:
( N S E(D)
10 ft.
Ga 9 ft.
y,_ft,
Side Yard:
(N S E W)
to ft.
L D ft.
_.
ft.
Rear Yard:
( N S E W)
9 ft.
2 ©. ft.
-f)
ft.
Lakeside:
(N S E W)
ft.
ft.
ft.
(NSEW)
ft.
ft.
ft.
Street Frontage:
ft.
ft.
- ®"
ft.
Lot Size:
000 -sq ft
ink i8 sq ft
-'Cy
sq ft
Hardcover:
3C76
18 r 14 sa ft
Leo 5 —s-1 ft
=0
sq ft
4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is
located? Yes W, No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use:
5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the
uses permitted in that zoning district?
Atoo narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil
( ) too small ( ) drainage X existing situation
( ) too shallow ( ) shape "other: specify
Please describe: S t 5r ALA•
CG-I-At"&rZ -S 15 t /VK-wd LAJ 64L
Variance Information
(10/21/2013) Page 5 of 6
1:
GO
Case No.
6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in
the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes )4, No ( ). If yes, explain:
7 Nj;.16 014, r-tof ©N Sl0or— L-OT
7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes ( ), No (1\6 If yes, explain:
8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property
described in
this petition? Yes W, No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
9. Comments:
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information
provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized
official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be required by IpW.
Owner's
Applican
Variance Information
(10/21/2013) Page 6 of 6
1088-
Date Z! 11q
Date 21 f (, _
Sarah Smith
From: Longfield, Lynn M [ Lynn .M.Longfield @xcelenergy.com]
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 1:50 PM
To: Jill Norlander; Ray Hanson; Dan Faulkner; Scott Qualle; Manderschied, Melissa J.; Rita
Trapp, Greg Pederson (gpederson @moundfire.com), Coney Farniok; Carlton Moore;
Catherine Pausche; Jack Gleason; tdietrich @minnehahacreek.org; Alta Denisova Centerpoint;
Christopher Thompson Mediacom; Steven Storo Frontier; Anderson, Bonnie J
Cc: Sarah Smith
Subject: RE: Centerview Subdivision
Attachments: 2201 Centerview Ln, Mound.pdf; GIS Map Symbols Legend_2010.pdf
Xcel Energy has electrical facilities in this area of subdivision.
Please see attached GIS map & legend of symbols.
Thank you,
Lynn Longfield < ><
Xcel Energy I Responsible By Nature
5505 Manitou Road, Excelsior, MN, 55331
952.470.3313, C: 612.669.4138, 952.470.3310
E: lynn.m.longfield@xcelenergy.com
Please consider the environment before printing this email. Also, please excuse any brevity andlor typos in this email.
—This e -mail, and any attachments, may contain confidential or private material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments,
From: Jill Norlander [ mailto •jillnorlander@cityofmound.com}
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 3:36 PM
To: Ray Hanson; Dan Faulkner; Scott Qualle; Manderschied, Melissa J.; Rita Trapp; Greg Pederson
(gpedersongmoundfire com); Correy Farniok; Carlton Moore; Catherine Pausche; Jack Gleason;
tdietrich(dminnehahacreek.org; Alla Denisova Centerpoint; Christopher Thompson Mediacom; Longfield, Lynn M; Steven
Storo Frontier; Anderson, Bonnie J
Cc: Sarah Smith
Subject: Centerview Subdivision
Please review and respond to Sarah by April 21 ". Thanks.
crrr.. n,,+Wa
Sill Norlander, Admin Assist
952 -472 -0607 Phone
952- 472 -0620 Fax
City Hall Hours
MQN - FRI 8:00 - 4:30
-1089-
1
Smallworld Electric Distribution Symbols January 2010
Primary Meter
NM Non - metered Facility
Manhole
Retired Manhole
Generic Pad
Transformer Pad
Medical Alert Condition
-(- Lot Centroid
Xcel /Unknown Dist. Pole
xy
l,.
Foreign Dist. Pole
overhea
d
Cust. Owned Dist. Pole
C)
Xcel /Unknown Orn. Pole
-,, O
Cust. Owned Orn. Pole
-\,
Xcel Trans. Pole
C5) PMH -5 (D PMH -9
Foreign Trans. Pole
t'tru
Xcel Trans. Tower
fisb PMH -10
Electric Riser
�. 95,
Primary Open
" 9(¢
n
Anchor Guy
Substation
Push Brace
Ground Brace
--
H Fixture
Primary Meter
NM Non - metered Facility
Manhole
Retired Manhole
Generic Pad
Transformer Pad
Medical Alert Condition
-(- Lot Centroid
Vault
xy
l,.
Retired Vault
overhea
d
Secondary Transformer
Secondary Pedestal
-,, O
Metered Secondary
-\,
Streetlight Control
C5) PMH -5 (D PMH -9
Secondary Splice Box
t'tru
Primary Splice Box
fisb PMH -10
Retired Splice Box
�. 95,
Primary Open
" 9(¢
n
Secondary Open
Primary Meter
NM Non - metered Facility
Manhole
Retired Manhole
Generic Pad
Transformer Pad
Medical Alert Condition
-(- Lot Centroid
Deferral Cabinet
Transformers
f
-
Switching Facility Symbols
overhea
d
Underground
Switch Centers
-,, O
One -phase
-\,
�
(3 PMH -3
C5) PMH -5 (D PMH -9
OH & UG Switch
t'tru
Agp
fisb PMH -10
C1j pMH -11 PMH -12
�. 95,
Three - phase
" 9(¢
n
Automated 0 Unknown
Substation
wye -wye
Elbow Center
Two -phase
wye -delta
��,. 9�
Open Elbow
C/
Closed Elbow
9�
Three -phase
Open Cable Terminator
C
wye -delta
Closed Cable Terminator
�tp
n
Step-up/
Vacuum Switch
Step -down
Vacuum Interrupter
�p
P
Three - phase
delta
"` ; Y��
Busbar
-delta
Directional. Nightwatch
d1
One -phase
�'
_ i
Area Nightwatch
delta
41
. _7
Three -phase
V O
I
—�
Xcel /Unknown Street Light
P
delta -wye
-
�-
Cust. Owned Street Light
9�
poopen
Three -phase
,VV 9�P
; <
Ornamental Light
delta -open delta
Lightning Arrestor
Deferral Cabinet
SSj Sectionalizer Bank
Substation
((j l Cogeneration
Note: Actual Location Symbols are 1/2 size of
the normal symbols _1091_ ay in color.
Neutral Isolating Device
Primary Intersect
® Connector
UG Primary Splice
Component Primary Splice
UG Secondary Splice
•
Switches & Fuses
f
-
Closed
F
Open
OH & UG
Point
Disconnect Switch
2a
X
OH & UG Switch
t'tru
Agp
OH & UG ATO
1AT1011
OH & UG Fuse
°1a
OCB
Substation
OCBI
SSj Sectionalizer Bank
Substation
((j l Cogeneration
Note: Actual Location Symbols are 1/2 size of
the normal symbols _1091_ ay in color.
Neutral Isolating Device
Primary Intersect
® Connector
UG Primary Splice
Component Primary Splice
UG Secondary Splice
•
Clrcutt Breaker
f
-
OH Capacitor
F
UG Capacitor
Regulator Bank
Point
°)
Recloser Bank
SSj Sectionalizer Bank
Substation
((j l Cogeneration
Note: Actual Location Symbols are 1/2 size of
the normal symbols _1091_ ay in color.
Neutral Isolating Device
Primary Intersect
® Connector
UG Primary Splice
Component Primary Splice
UG Secondary Splice
•
Mid -Span Tap
n
Cable Failure Indicator
F
Fault Indicator
Locator
Symbol Status: Black denotes "Install" status
Symbol with an X denotes "Remove" status
Electric XY
Primary Structure Node
Secondary Structure Node
Misc Electric Landmark
Point
Error Symbol: Errorwith
Attributes; Unable to
Symbol Status: Black denotes "Install" status
Symbol with an X denotes "Remove" status
Primary and Secondary
Change Marker
OH Prim — + -
- - --
OH Sec
UG Sec i
Annotation Mules
UG Fuse size is not annotated
on distribution maps.
NSP -MN and NSP WI
The following are NOT annotated:
65 Amp Fuses (size)
• UG 1/0 Secondaries
• UG 6 Duplex Street Wire
• UG 4/0 AL TX feeding a
pedestal. (Do not make
4/0 secondaries feeding
pedestal coincident.)
PSCO and SPS
The following are NOT annotated:
• OH 65 Amp Fuses (size)
• UG 350 Al Triplex Secondary
• UG 12/2 Cu Duplex Secondary
Component One Phase
Component Two Phase
Component Three Phase
Component Mainline
Component Secondary
Secondary
Neutral Only
2 Wire Service _._______.____ --- _____
3 Wire Service "- - - -- __ - - - --`
4 Wire Service
Transmission Line
Span Guy
Error Symbol: Error with Attributes; Unable to Symbolize Correctly
Customer Pointer
Retired UG Primary -
Retired UG Secondary
Conduit
Retired Conduit = - --
Duct Bank
Retired Duct Bank
UG Route Trench -- -- -.._- .....--- _.____..
UG Route Joint Trench
Joint Trench Line
Tunnel
Gas Tunnel
Cable Segments
Cable Segment Break Point 0
Cable Segment -
Cable Segment Delete
Old Cable Segment
If you find discrepancies on a map, please make the necessary changes on the Map Copy and
send it (along with your name and location) to:
Minnesota Colorado
Mapping Department Mapping Department
c/o Allan Radke, Mgr c/o Bill Lucatuorto, Mgr
Chestnut Service Center (CSC) - I Lipan Distribution Center (LDC) - 1
^° for — Art King
2201 Centerview Lane
Mound, Mn 55364
Proposed Parcel A:
That part of Lots 14, 15, 19. and 20, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION LAKESIDE PARK,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 14; thence South 60 degrees 12 minutes 23 seconds
East, assumed bearing along the northeasterly line of said Lot 14, 85.44 feet. to the Northeast corner
of said Lot 14; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 49 seconds West, along the southeasterly line of
said Lot 14, 23.40 feet, thence South 25 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds West, 76.53 feet to a point
on the southwesterly line ofsaid Lot 19, distant 80.00 feet northwesterly of the Southeast corner of
said Lot 19, as measured along said southwesterly line; thence North 60 degrees 15 minutes 17
seconds West, along said southwesterly line of Lot 19, and its northwesterly extension, 56.88 feet, to
the West line of said Block 6, thence North 00 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West, along said West
line, 68.72 feet to the southeasterly line of Downs Ave., as dedicated in said plat thence North 29
degrees 48 minutes 32 seconds East, along the northwesterly line of said Lot 14, 40.01 feet to the
point of beginning.
Proposed Parcel B:
Lot 21, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
and that part of Lot 20 in said plat described as fol lows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 21; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 49 seconds
West, assumed bearing along the northwesterly line of said Lot 20, 23.40 feet; thence South 59
degrees 41 minutes 56 seconds East, 85.36 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot 20, thence North
29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds East, along said southeasterly line, 24.15 feet to the Northeast
corner of said Lot 20, thence North 60 degrees 12 minutes 08 seconds West, along the northeasterly
fine of said Lot 20, 85.36 feet to the point of beginning.
Proposed Parcel C:
That part of Lots 19 and 20, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE
PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 20; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes
41 seconds West, assumed bearing along the southeasterly line of said Lot 20, 24.15 feet
to the point of beginning; thence continue South 29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds West,
along the southeasterly line of said Lots 19 and 20, 75.73 feet to the Southeast corner of
said Lot 19; thence North 60 degrees 15 minute 17 seconds West, along the southwesterly
line of said Lot 19, 80.00 feet; thence North 25 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds West, 76.53
feet, to the West line of said Lot 20; thence South 59 degrees 41 minutes 56 seconds East,
85.36 feet to the point of beginning.
Hard Surface Calculations:
Parcel A: Parcel B: Parcel C:
Lot Area: 7706 s.f Lot Area: 6281 s.f. Lot Area: 6278 s.f.
Prop, House: 1040 s.f. Prop. House: 874 s.f. Exist. House: 627 s.f.
Prop. Gar: 480 s.f. Prop. Gar: 480 s.f. Prop. Add.: 240 s.f.
Prop. DW.• 636 s.f. Prop. DW 479 s.f. Prop. Gar.: 480 s.f.
Total H.S.: 2156 s.f. Total H.S.: 1833 s.f Prop. DW.- 458 s.f.
H.S. % 27.98 H.S, %: 29.18 Total H. S.: 1805 s.f
H. S. %: 28.75
1 hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under
my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
` 0
940.9 6 X
CL
I s o X
X n0
ga
3 gag ° °i POND
3
, 940.1 /XSao 6 1 X
X gpti o
� 941.4
/ X
'\, \ 940.9 C / Xry \ \ S
S ^9/4 - Sb,Oo r 6075
SS x g 8 g �2? °� hO O `` BSS S6 F
/
1.a � / m °�. o o � � o` �p0.,� �\ Doti � / gd'�6
' x CEp.
3 5 / O� PAR /e
gQ0"g sco
•0C y ,1 '¢ / yo J �J�J ° \ h, / 1
o o�s a $ \ 4 r� 4( \ apn m °
g ry /X L X g1 941.8 N, pb \ X
C7 Ljx
W a 7,9, oQ
2> g��
h �
`.
ua^ n 41 �C31 o / l `S9� rygs °j Saa�A \3 \ 00
0,�m�o�
9n
Fbsr
"n 9G�c
X5
gAry
N
X garL
W (,�/+ g8� X
e °V ��O / V �6 W
f]�"
I \ /
w 949.y e6 $O
°J /'�•� g0. Q'( hXgS saa. o
944.1`- \ X r 3y /
943.7 S6 r /c�'
tr0!-
O 222 2 oX °o / q ?° `
rasa x945.9 N 949.7 19 �`o \� �g�
ti 0 5 a
/ < "sas.o 6O 76.171> 600, zaa ttr}
2�
952.0 g6�< 7 0
/c. \ � '�' `�' s. e"'a � t ry�b co
<NF <YyFF / g 219 C2
Ore <it,FOOC 3
18 952.0
/ 948.2 y""
Existing Property Description:
Lots 14, 19, 20, 21, and that part of Lot 15 lying Northeasterly of the /X aoo
Northeasterly line of Lot 18, extended Northwesterly across said Lot
15, all in Block 6, ABRAHAMLINCOLN ADDITION LAKE SIDE PARK,
Hennepin County, Minnesota. Subject to easements of record.
Containing 20,265 sq. ft / 0.46 Acres +/-
22703 03131114 REVISED: 04122114 - PARCEL A & B
Steven V. Ische License No. Date REVISED: 04/01/14 - PARCEL C
Traverse PC
Note: Sewer & Water services shown
as marked by City of Mound and
as -built plans
sewer service shown per 1963
as -built plan prepared by Schoell
& Madsen
LEGEND
O
Set Iron Monument
Found Iron Monument
Q
Sanitary Manhole
—w---
Watermain
—ss—
Sanitary Sewer
©
Catch Basin
x945.0
Existing Elevation
x(945.0)
Proposed Elevation
-- - - - --
Proposed Surface Drainage
OREMIER
LAND SURVEYING, LLC
952 - 443 -3010 -1093-
11111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 iiiiiiiiiiiilii
t ' •
Property Address:
2201 Centerview Lane
Mound, Mn 55364
Description of Property Surveyed.
Lots 14, 19, 20, 21, and that part of Lot 15
lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly line
of Lot 18, extended Northwesterly across
said Lot 15, all in Block 6, ABRAHAM
LINCOLN ADDITION LAKE SIDE PARK,
Hennepin County, Minnesota. Subject'
to easements of record.
Containing 20,265 sq. ft / 0.46 Acres +/-
Hard Cover Calculations:
Existing House: 625 sq. ft.
Existing Sidewalk: 85 sq. ft.
Existing Driveway. 691 sq. ft.
Total Hard Cover. 1401 sq. ft.
Hard Cover %: 6.91
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under
my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
22703 12116113
Steven v Ische License No. Date
Traverse PC
i
/
/
I
M
LEGEND
O Set Iron Monument
Found Iron Monument
�m
c°
u°
POND
sso �
h �
ey�sr
21
14
W �\ / �� gs
Np x\96
/}
Z / 20
15
Nsoo / � 8s36,
'g F
T n OF 19 3
?�
\ }C11
�'
N o
60 7s ��� 2�3• �� sa
r 7
'a-
18
i
Revised 12119113 - Interior Lot Dimensions
Revised 01107114 - Hard Cover Calculations
m �nj
n
oh
ry
y
�a
OREMIER
LAND SURVEYING. LLC
952 - 443 -3010
-1094 -
RE.CT APR 12014
Government Finance Officers Association
203 N. LaSalle Street - Suite 2700
Chicago, IL 60601
Phone(312)977 -9700 Fax(312)977 -4806
November 15, 2013
Kandis M. Hanson
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound MN 55364
Dear Ms. Hanson:
We are pleased to notify you that your comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012
qualifies for a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. The Certificate of Achievement is the
highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant
accomplishment by a government and its management.
The Certificate of Achievement plaque will be shipped to:
Catherine Pausche
Director of Finance & Administrative Services
under separate cover in about eight weeks. We hope that you will arrange for a formal presentation of the Certificate and
Award of Financial Reporting Achievement, and that appropriate publicity will be given to this notable achievement. A
sample news release is enclosed to assist with this effort. In addition, details of recent recipients of the Certificate of
Achievement and other information about Certificate Program results are available in the "Awards Program" area of our
website, www.gfoa.org.
We hope that your example will encourage other government officials in their efforts to achieve and maintain an
appropriate standard of excellence in financial reporting.
Sincerely,
Government Finance Officers Association
AVOIU41 �
Stephen J. Gauthier, Director
Technical Services Center
SJG /ds
-1095-
Government Finance Officers Association
203 N. LaSalle Street - Suite 2700
Chicago, IL 60601
a Phone (312) 977 -9700 Fax(312)977-4806
11/15/2013
NEWS RELEASE
For Information contact:
Stephen Gauthier (312)977 -9700
(Chicago) - -The Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting has been
awarded to City of Mound by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States
and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR). The Certificate of
Achievement is the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and
financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government
and its management.
An Award of Financial Reporting Achievement has been awarded to the individual(s),
department or agency designated by the government as primarily responsible for preparing the
award- winning CAFR. This has been presented to:
Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance & Administrative Services
The CAFR has been judged by an impartial panel to meet the high standards of the program
including demonstrating a constructive "spirit of full disclosure" to clearly communicate its
financial story and motivate potential users and user groups to read the CAFR,
The GFOA is a nonprofit professional association serving approximately 17,500 government
finance professionals with offices in Chicago, IL, and Washington, D.C.
-1096-
Kandis Hanson
Subject: FW: Right -of -Entry form for Surfside launch for inspectors
From: Jay Green [ma ! Ito: JaygreenfishingLd)yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 3:43 PM
To: Kandis Hanson
Cc: Catherine Pausche; Greg Nybeck
Subject: Right -of -Entry form for Surfside launch for inspectors
Kandis,
The LMCD staff is preparing to send the city the Right -of -Entry form for the Surfside access that
would allow our watercraft inspectors to perform inspections for the 2014 boating season. In the
discussion with the city council last year, there were two additional requirements that needed to be
met for this season.
The first was to provide a summary of the inspection data from last season, including the number of
potentially infested watercraft encountered. I have compiled that data and that report will be included.
The second was for AIS preventative information to be distributed by the nspectors. I worked with the
LMCD's AIS Tack Force, as well as members of the DNR's AIS Advisory Committee, to determine
what information was available and what suited our needs the best. For the 2014 season, we will
begin distributing a pamphlet that
is produced by the DNR called "Help Protect Minnesota's Waters ". It includes basic preventative
measures and also what is required by law. We are also going to reproduce and distribute a more
comprehensive AIS booklet. This booklet, which is used by number of other groups, includes more
detailed information on many styles of boats as well as docks, boatlifts and more. This booklet will be
made available to the member cities, and also available to the public through the sheriff's water
patrol, marinas and other locations around the lake. Both of these handouts
will be included as well.
Thanks
Jay Green
LMCD Representative - Mound
-1097-
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 22, 2014
TO: Mayor Hanus and Council Members
FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Manaq ,'
Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer
5341. MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364 -1687
PH. (952) 472 -0600
FAX: (952) 472 -0620
WEB: www.cltyofmound.com
RE: Update on costs to move City Hall and upgrade the Centennial Building as
rental property for non - profits
A report on the cost of moving City Hall was printed in the Spring /Summer edition of the City
Contact. An update of the report is now available that better defines and more accurately depicts
the categories of spending.
In the last months of 2012, the Cities of Mound and Orono completed negotiations for contracted
police services, leaving vacant the police space at the Mound Public Safety Facility. A two -fold
decision was made by the City of Mound: 1) Mound City Hall would move to the former police
space, and 2) the former City Hall would be converted to rental space for non - profit and quasi -
governmental organizations.
(Currently, the Centennial Building has four tenants with room for 1 -3 more tenants. It has
served to provide space for a sector of organizations otherwise underserved.)
The spreadsheet attached shows the cost o£ 1) preparing a police precinct for use by Orono PD,
2) the cost of conversion of police office space for use as a city hall, and 3) the cost of
conversion of former city hall to rental space. Finally, it shows the cost of maintenance and
repairs that were due the two buildings.
From a business perspective, the return on investment related to these building improvements is
considered healthy -10 months for improvements to new City Hall space and 4 months for
improvements to the Centennial Building. Contracting for police services is a long -term
commitment and promises six - figure savings for Mound on a long -term consistent basis.
-1098-
printed on racyclao paper
Maintenance to what are aging buildings will always be a factor and must be planned for in the
continuum.
Staff continues to encourage that the move to contracted policing was a good one and that
money spent to facilitate the decision was done with frugality just enough to make these spaces
function in their new purpose, without excess or frills.
Staff would be pleased to assist in any discussion.
1099-
y
t
a
C
3
O
`o
Y
a
d
a
N
E
E
@
m
v
L
N
p
0
@
C
O
'O
@
L M
O O
U N
N C
@Y
c
00
o m
a c
p
N
@ a
n �
N
m c
c @
> p
@ c
w �
O
d �
m
E o
- U
c @
O t
N V
U �
N p
c c
o> o
Q N
O
w Q
0 0
m �
-p a
[a
m >
c �
m Z
ac
O N
0
v 3
N
0
a y
_ p
L
m
c
E
E
0
O
O
0
0
N
m
0
m
0
E
w
m
c
@
E
C O
O
01
V
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
d '0
p
69
f9
IA
V
V m O
O y
N
N
N
O
Y1
m
O
�O
O
M
06
G
> p
O
O
OJ
M
O
O
N
N
N
p
N
Y1
F 6
C M
M
M
M
V
.1i
M
m
(Op
O
@ O y
�
2 LL
_U
U o.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
M
R
O
N
O
O
6
O
y V
f9
T
W
v1
V
V
p C
r
r
O
N
Q U
N
a a
00
00
00
00
00
0.
M
U
O
V
t0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
@
C
OJ
N
d
N
M
C
�
O)
C
N
t
N
N
U
N
O
Z
O
_pi
O
C
O
pj
'00
O.
O1
U
¢
U
p
N
N
M
Z
CpO
c
o
°
Z
Z
Z
o� 0°
o
v
n
C
c m
c
-p
W
M
c6
y
w
w
`o_
c
`o m
O M
c
m
m
m
d
c
co
E
O
c
L
c
c
c
@
co
n
aNi
c m
U
c
>@
U
U
S
d
<
V1
U N
U m
Y
0
N
U
Q
<
nr
m
N
w
U
U
N
U
N
N
Z_
W
U
N
O
O
a
U
U <
O
a
LLI
Q fL
}
N
W
O
Z
Z Lu
Z
F
O
A
z
Z
g
m
Z
z
O
Z
OU
p
<
z
ti
4
a
o
O
CLJ
0
N
g
O
a
O
<
~
z
>
¢
w
z
z0
�
=
U
m
m
2
x
0
s
U
a
0
W�
M
iron-
2
a
d
a
N
E
E
@
m
v
L
N
p
0
@
C
O
'O
@
L M
O O
U N
N C
@Y
c
00
o m
a c
p
N
@ a
n �
N
m c
c @
> p
@ c
w �
O
d �
m
E o
- U
c @
O t
N V
U �
N p
c c
o> o
Q N
O
w Q
0 0
m �
-p a
[a
m >
c �
m Z
ac
O N
0
v 3
N
0
a y
_ p
L
m
c
E
E
0
O
O
0
0
N
m
0
m
0
E
w
m
c
@
E
+qte
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364 -1687
PH: (952) 472 -0600
FAX :(952)472 -0620
WEB. www.cityofmound.com
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 22, 2014
TO:
Mayor Hanus and Council Members
FROM:
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
RE: Distribution of Council Packets
On Apr 15, 2014, Supervisors representing the City of Mound presented their Annual Reports to
the members of the Mound City Council. At this annual event, Supervisors place emphasis on
what are the challenges facing their departments and forecast budgetary needs.
As a part of those discussions, the topic of expediting the receipt of City Council Packets was
touched upon. To maximize the time for the study of packet content, City Staff has been
directed to prepare packets in time for distribution on Thursday in a week that precedes a council
meeting. The only exception to that would be in the instance of mechanical difficulties with the
copier, which can occur.
Under the current approach, there are seven business days in which to research and /or prepare, in
a week without holidays or other interruptions and /or absences. With less days, here are some
examples of change:
• Certain claims and topics have to be delayed until the next meeting. This means more
manual checks to meet invoice deadlines in order to avoid late fees and delays for certain
issues.
0 An early packet deadline adds to the last minute handouts. In this scenario, the public will
not get all the information to be discussed.
Council Members are invited to discuss and consider any further changes to process.
-1101-
' prated on recyoled paper
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 22, 2014
TO: Mayor Hanus and Council Members
FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Managel�.�4
RE: Ground Breakings & Ribbon Cuttings
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364 -1687
PH: (552) 472 -0600
FAX: (952) 472 -0620
WEB: www.cityotmound.corn
At a recent meeting with the City Manager and the City Council, City involvement in ground
breakings and ribbon cuttings was among topics discussed.
The directive `celebrate Mound' was loud and clear from early on and Staff has made it a point
to seize opportunities to draw positive attention to Mound in a variety of ways. Two of those
methods to celebrate have been ground breakings and ribbon cuttings.
Ground breakings go back to 2002, when the City purchased the old post office, demolished it
and started construction on the Greenway and Pier. Since then there have been ground breakings
on public and private projects, which have included Mound MarketPlace and more recently
Dakota Junction.
Ribbon cuttings and other dedication ceremonies took place over the years, as we celebrated the
opening of Harbor Wine & Spirits, the Public Safety Building and more recently, the Centennial
Building. With the lack of public projects in the recession years, the emphasis turned to ribbon
cutting events for businesses expanding in Mound or newly locating here. As part of the
Centennial Celebration, we also publicly dedicated and cut the ribbon for the renamed Surfside
Beach and Park.
Each of these events over the years put a positive spotlight on Mound, with the goal being to
overcome the prevailing negative image of Mound. In spite of the efforts of City and School to
overcome the old image, the perception of Mound, in my experience and from comments that I
take, continues to lag. It is Staff's opinion that any reason to celebrate puts Mound in the
spotlight and continues to build a positive image for our community.
Staff encourages the discussion around these topics and up -to -date Staff direction as to the
wishes of the City Council.
-1102-
printed on recycled paper
PH: (952) 472 -0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 22, 2014
TO: Mayor Hanus and Council Members
Cs
FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Mana`gV1 f J
RE: Remembrance for former Senator Steve Smith
Since the recent passing of former Senator Steve Smith, a few individuals have mentioned the
appropriateness of remembering him in some way. An affiliate of Steve's with the Hennepin
District Courts recommended memorializing a park bench at the Mound Greenway with a bronze
plate.
While holding office as Minnesota State Senator, Steve Smith did many good things worthy of
recognition by the City of Mound. In my experience, he assisted in overturnng a DNR decision
that would have otherwise impeded development in the downtown as we know it today. Fire
Chief Greg Pederson can cite several examples of how Steve benefited fire departments and
Mound Fire Department, in particular. These are just two examples of many.
You are invited to discuss and decide what may be appropriate.
-1103 -
printeJ on recycletl paper
City of Mound
BMI Engineering Hours YTD as of 12/31/13
;t.Project„ ;.,
Hourss # ;-,
r$Billed ,,
„d',Fund
"; Fund /FUntling Source;`
Mound /Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision
326.50
29,401.50
Escrows
Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners
Mound /MCES Projects ,Review /Coordination
44.50
5,600.00
Escrows
Escrow Accounts- Billed to property owners /agencies
Mound /Development Reviews
29.50
3,723.00
Escrows
Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners
Sewer Fees
400.50
38,724.50
76,106.40
Mound /General Engineering
254.00
21,227.50
101
General Fund/Taxes
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1 /4)
2.88
336.00
101
Streets (1 /4)/Taxes
Mound /GIS Updates
1.00
95.00
101
Streets/Taxes
602
257.88
21,658.50
2.88
Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall
961.50
95,397.50
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /SW Island Area
103.00
9,642.50
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland
59.50
5,741.00
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements
7,704.50
710,071.51
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /Island View Drive Reconstruction
11.00
1,049.50
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall
992.50
97,420.50
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
9,832.00
919,322.51
10.00
Mound /MSA System Update
65.50
9,215.00
402
Municipal State Aid for Streets (MSA Funds)
Mound /2013 Crack Seal Coat Project
82.50
9,294.00
427
MSA Funds /General Funds
Storm Water Fees
148.00
18,509.00
336.00
Mound /Watermain Loop Island View
15.50
1,337.00
601
Water Fees
Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace
95.50
8,943.00
601
Water Fees
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4)
2.88
336.00
601
Water Fees (1/4)
Mound /Water Supply Emergency Consery
0.50
71.00
601
Water Fees
Mound /Water System Modeling
103.00
10,744.08
601
Water Fees
Mound /Wellhead Protection Plan
2.00
284.00
601
Water Fees
Mound /GIS Updates
6.50
583.33
601
Water Fees
225.88
22,298.41
Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements
47.00
Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction
43.50
4,173.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction
10.50
966.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2012 Lift Station Reconstruction
46.00
4,941.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvement
609.00
76,106.40
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvement
33.50
4,009.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /I & I Analysis Report
18.00
2,250.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4)
2.88
33600
602
Sewer Fees (1 /4)
Mound /GIS Updates
7.00
583.33
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /MCES Flows /City Charges
3.50
480.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2012 MCES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct
299.00
32,253.50
602
Sewer Fees
1,072.88
126,098.23
Mound /2011 Storm Drainage Improvements
10.00
1,392.50
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /WCA Administration
18.00
1,606.50
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4)
2.88
336.00
675
Storm Water Fees (1/4)
Mound /GIS Updates
7.00
583.34
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /SWPPP Update
18.00
1,734.50
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /2012 Drainage Improvement Project
11.00
1,562.00
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /Surface Water Management
190.00
22,349.38
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /2013 Storm Drainage Improvements
206.00
21,804.50
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements
47.00
5,815.50
675
Storm Water Fees
509.88
57,184.22
12/31/13 YTD Total 12,447.00 1,203,795.37
-1104-
2013 YTD through 4th Quarter
-1105-
12,447.00 1,203, 795.37
BIIIWBSI
Project
Hours
$ Billed
C12.037921
Mound /General Engineering
254.00
21,227.50
C12.037929
Mound /WCA Administration
18.00
1,606.50
C12.038004
Mound /Water System Modeling
103.00!
10,744.08
C12.038077
Mound /I & I Analysis & 2011 CIPP Project
18.00
2,250.00
C12.038243
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps
11.50
1,344.00
C12.038388
Mound /Water Supply Emergency Consery
0.501
71.00
C12.038996
Mound /Development Reviews
29.50,
3,723.00
C12.039286
Mound /SWPPP Update
18.00'
1,734.50
C12.039425
Mound /MSA System Coordination
65.50'
9,215.00
C12.040166 'Mound
/Wellhead Protection Plan
2.00'
284.00
C12.040420
Mound /Island View Drive Reconstruction
11.00'
1,049.50
C12.100590 'Mound
/GIS Updates
21.50'
1,845.00
C12.100601 Mound /MCES Flows /City Charges
3.50'
480.00
C12.101482 (Mound /SW Island Area
103.00,,
9,642.50
C12. 101514 Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland
59.50!
5,741.00
C12.101909 Mound /Surface Water Management
190.00
22,349.38
C12.102014 Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction
43.501
4,173.00
C12.103114 Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction
10.501
966.00
C12.103254 'Mound /Watermain Loop Island View
15.50
1,337.00
C12.103438 Mound /2011 Storm Drainage Improvements
10.00
1,392.50
C12.103970 Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall
961.50(
95,397.50
C12.104174 Mound /2012 Storm Drainage Improvements
11.001
1,562.00
C12.104413 'Mound /2012 Lift Station Improvement
46.00,
4,941.00
C12.105545 Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements
7,704.50;
710,071.51
C12.105673 Mound /2012 VICES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct
299.00!
32,253.50
C12.105883 Mound /Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision
326.50
29,401.50
C12.105944 'Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvment
609.00
76,106.40
C12.105964 Mound /2013 Storm Drainage Improvements
206.001
21,804.50
C12.106416 iMound /MCES Projects, Review /Coordination
44.50'1
5,600.00
C12.106810 , Mound /2013 Crack Seal and Seal Coat
82.50
9,294.00
C12.106985 Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements
47.001:
5,815.50
C12.107130 Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining W
992.501
97,420.50
C12.107414 Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvment
33.50'
4,009.00
C12.107415 Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace
95.50'
8,943.00
2013 YTD through 4th Quarter
-1105-
12,447.00 1,203, 795.37
1 3 *
City of Mound
Ms Kandis Hanson
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364 -1668
e
MoundIGIS U da
Services from November 9, 2013 through December 20, 2013:
Professional Services Hours
Technician
Mackey, Caleb
Meyers, Nick
Totals
Total Labor
.l
December 31, 2013
Project No: C12.100590
Invoice No: 0163101
Rate
19.00 85.00
1.50 90.00
20.50
Amount
1,615.00
135.00
1,750.00
Total this Invoice
Notice: A finance charge of' '5% per month lannuat percentage of 18°/ I is charged on balances 30 days or over.
-1106 -
Notice: A finance charge of L5 % per Man
December
percentage of 18 °f 1 is charged 00 balances 30 days or over.
1,750.00
$1,750.00
City of Mound
BMI Engineering Hours YTD as of 03/31/14
Project
: Hours
$ Billed
Fund
-: .:-Fund /Funding Source
Mound /MCES Projects, Review /Coordination
0.50
71.00
Escrows
Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners /agencies
Mound /Development Reviews
4.00
576.00
Escrows
Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners
4.50
647.00
Mound /General Engineering
67.00
5,674.78
101
General Fund/Taxes
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (114)
1.63
172.50
101
Streets (1 /4)/Taxes
Mound /GIS Updates
1.00
88.00
101
Streets/Taxes
69.63
5,935.28
Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall
68.50
7,944.50
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /Street Light Replacement
0.00
0.00
401
Federal Grants /City Match /MSA
Mound /SW Island Area
11.00
1,067.50
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland
1.00
90.00
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements
348.50
34,145.50
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /Manchester Site & Lynwood Site
0.00
0.00
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall
1,359.50
134,811.50
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
1,788.50
178,059.00
Mound /MSA System Update
10.50
1,505.00
402
Municipal State Aid for Streets (MSA Funds)
Mound /2013 Crack Seal Coat Project
0.00
0.00
427
MSA Funds /General Funds
10.50
1,505.00
Mound /Watermain Loop Island View
0.00
0.00
601
Water Fees
Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace
172.00
17,897.00
601
Water Fees
Mound /Water System Modeling
21.50
2,382.65
601
Water Fees
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4)
1.63
172.50
601
Water Fees (1/4)
Mound /Water Supply Emergency Consery
0.00
0.00
601
Water Fees
Mound /Wellhead Protection Plan
0.00
0.00
601
Water Fees
Mound /GIS Updates
0.00
0.00
601
Water Fees
195.13
20,452.15
Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction
2.50
245.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction
2.50
245.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2012 Lift Station Reconstruction
1.00
98.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvement
28.00
2,875.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvement
111.50
12,664.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /I & I Analysis Report
0.00
0.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4)
1.63
172.50
602
Sewer Fees (1/4)
Mound /GIS Updates
0.00
0.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /MCES Flows /City Charges
0.00
0.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2012 MCES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct
55.50
5,459.50
602
Sewer Fees
202.63
21,759.00
Mound /2011 Storm Drainage Improvements
0.00
0.00
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /WCA Administration
1.50
160.00
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /SWPPP Update
6.50
740.00
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4)
1.63
172.50
675
Storm Water Fees (1/4)
Mound /GIS Updates
0.00
0.00
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /2012 Drainage Improvement Project
0.00
0.00
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /Surface Water Management
20.50
2,843.50
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /2013 Storm Drainage Improvements
0.00
0.00
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements
11.50
1,594.00
675
Storm Water Fees
41.63
5,510.00
03/31/14 YTD Total
2,312.50
233,867.43
-1107-
BiIIWBS1
I Project
Hours
$ Billed
C12.037921
Mound /General Engineering
67.00
5,674.78
C12.037929
Mound /WCA Administration
1.50'
160.00
C12.038004
Mound /Water System Modeling
21.50:
2,382.65
C12. 038243
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps
6.501
690.00
C12.038996
Mound /Development Reviews
4.00'
576.00
C12.039286
Mound /SWPPP Update
6.50'
740.00
C12. 039425 ,Mound
_ /MSASystem Coordination
10.50]
1,505.00
C12.100590
Mound /GIS Updates
1.00,
88.00
C12.101482
Mound /SW Island Area
11.001
1,067.50
C12.101514
Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland
1.00'
90.00
C12.101909 Mound /Surface Water Management
20.501
2,843.50
C12.102014 !Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction
2.501'
245.00
C12.103114 Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction
2.50'
245.00
C12.103970 Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall
68.50
7,944.50
C12.104413 Mound /2012 Lift Station Improvement
1.00'
98.00
C12.105545 Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements
348.50'
34,145.50
C12.105673 Mound /2012 MCES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct
55.50
5,459.50
C12.105944 Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvment
28.00
2,875.00
C12.106416' Mound /MCES Projects, Review /Coordination
0.501
71.00
C12.106985 Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements
11.50
1,594.00
C12.107130 Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining W
1,359.50'
134,811.50
C12.107414 Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvment
111.50',
12,664.00
C12.107415 Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace
172.00,
17,897.00
2014 YTD through 1st Quarter
-1108-
21312.50 $ 233,867.43
O
Z
0
a
oW
z�
o�
0 w
m °
W g o
p � N
0;
U ?
a
U
V) Q N !O M N N (O h Q (O N f0 h 0
f M Q INN — M N N Nr vim
v (D V
N O p M N O N
N h N N h M h M O � h M h W 01 (A O (p tp M (D W �
h W Q N (p M O> N Itl N Q N !O M Q (p Q (p v O O O (p N
z N W
7 O N O O (O N W N rp
OJ Q N f0 � W 1� h N h N O N Q h O T � N N W m tp 1@ (° (p M
v
W O N t0 M
V N P
IN
Q OJ m M tD M N h ^ M - 0] LL'1 N tD v O m fO
h N N P N N INN-- � ^ M VI-
2-8
O_
y
O C
d N @
6
CQ d _O QUiQ Q]QQQ �
@ M
C N D 2 N N ON N N2 y
c Ci p E c c c c i c c d O zl
liN " EZ oo'o '0000 �c�o"��g "Od
> e
na`°. nnnn2wxa o'� >jin m3 °c'
dLLx'�_EWFEEE EEEE��F@- AUON'?� 0`o
O 4 O H O O C7 O O C7 C7 O O O O O O O 0: 1109- m U J y=
- N 01 O N P
Q (O
(O N
h h
M M
M
M
@ (p uJ
� N �
N M
h O
VJ N
M
N fp
O N
O h
O M
M
m m
M N
N 1(]
�V M
M
W
N �
N
y � T
C N C
W 02
i° ° o
202 J a tN LL Z N
J
O d d 2i U
FW33a t-
N m O m
W
Z
N V V (O V N N M N N d M O O
0
M F
W
M W Z
Z W
w a
aW
d
'O
m
O
O
O)
@
C
d
U
d
a
Q
i
O
Z
N
a
W o
z m N
0 w J
G(9 N d
O O
yma
U W
N
2
W
a
w
W
W O M N N V N N M O N
of O -: tN 6 N N N V M O r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0
N O N N N N W NON O M r M �fJ O r N
N
M
V OM OJrMVOmrNNOJ (OMrMN
(O O V Oro 0 � V r N r Yl N M N M N M N
O
N C4 C O
(p V tp f0 N M 07 M N c0 Co O r r
N O ro N N M N co
ID mcy;rN of
t U V N - V N NMN m Co m O 'If N •- N tO M M
r O M O r O o o O N o N w N o o v M
0 o MOOOO a in v� o rm
r O tN O M (O N M W N M V M t0 M W
�O (O (O N Or NM N N 06 L6 tONN O r
of (O W N N O [D (O M fN0 M M m V V M
O N E Ih N V W Mcn tfJ
V
tp (D M N N V' V O] N IfJ YJ
N N r r M r O O N N M
O r r N N h N O
O t0 M �O N N N M
W W V V N O (O (O V O N
r V O N V M M fD N O O_ t0
N M M r N N M V t0
N V v r v N N
Mrs " ON V tprN
M O] N M n R (p f0
N M N
N r N
D N M r
r ID N 1�
N O r N [O
M N
0 0 0 @ @ @@ @0 0 0 0 0 0
r O ( C c c c c O M O M r 0
O 0 O ( M m O r
V-t0 O .JNO
V
t0 N O O N
O W N N M r N
v
V
N M N OMJ "
W
NOOMNr V �- O r O
a,
M
6
r
N N N (V N (V
¢
r
N
N
�O r
t")
w
N O �
o N W
M t0 of ID f0 O
�-
�o
M r
co
W
g N
N
c
0
M F
W
M W Z
Z W
w a
aW
d
'O
m
O
O
O)
@
C
d
U
d
a
Q
i
O
Z
N
a
W o
z m N
0 w J
G(9 N d
O O
yma
U W
N
2
W
a
w
W
W O M N N V N N M O N
of O -: tN 6 N N N V M O r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0
N O N N N N W NON O M r M �fJ O r N
N
M
V OM OJrMVOmrNNOJ (OMrMN
(O O V Oro 0 � V r N r Yl N M N M N M N
O
N C4 C O
(p V tp f0 N M 07 M N c0 Co O r r
N O ro N N M N co
ID mcy;rN of
t U V N - V N NMN m Co m O 'If N •- N tO M M
r O M O r O o o O N o N w N o o v M
0 o MOOOO a in v� o rm
r O tN O M (O N M W N M V M t0 M W
�O (O (O N Or NM N N 06 L6 tONN O r
of (O W N N O [D (O M fN0 M M m V V M
O N E Ih N V W Mcn tfJ
V
tp (D M N N V' V O] N IfJ YJ
N N r r M r O O N N M
O r r N N h N O
O t0 M �O N N N M
W W V V N O (O (O V O N
r V O N V M M fD N O O_ t0
N M M r N N M V t0
N V v r v N N
Mrs " ON V tprN
M O] N M n R (p f0
N M N
N r N
D N M r
r ID N 1�
N O r N [O
M N
0 0 0 @ @ @@ @0 0 0 0 0 0
r O ( C c c c c O M O M r 0
O 0 O ( M m O r
V-t0 O .JNO
Y N
@ C N
U oc
y o
z w m m 'S dod > v
a wa. �n a U U m
J C O a c N N S E N G@ @ C= G ¢
E v @
0 0 � � c m a@'i c@ �` o'o E @
z0a.of-
Fu i7L �U�U-1110-
w
O
M O fD r N N M N N K N
ON r to V NMN L[l
V
Nro coro our co N
M W Y V c0 M V
N (O O r (O N O CO N
r O (O V M
- N
U N
C 5
@ N
C O �
'.0 o
Z L u o = O a
z
LL N- N U O N M
v o 0
=QOF -U'�
0
O
V
t0 N O O N
O W N N M r N
v
N
N M N OMJ "
V N uMi VO' r N
M
r
N
�O r
t")
w
N O �
o N W
M t0 of ID f0 O
�-
�o
Y N
@ C N
U oc
y o
z w m m 'S dod > v
a wa. �n a U U m
J C O a c N N S E N G@ @ C= G ¢
E v @
0 0 � � c m a@'i c@ �` o'o E @
z0a.of-
Fu i7L �U�U-1110-
w
O
M O fD r N N M N N K N
ON r to V NMN L[l
V
Nro coro our co N
M W Y V c0 M V
N (O O r (O N O CO N
r O (O V M
- N
U N
C 5
@ N
C O �
'.0 o
Z L u o = O a
z
LL N- N U O N M
v o 0
=QOF -U'�
0
O
ED
May 15, 2014
10TU iM]
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
City Of Mound
2415 Wilshire Blvd
Mound, MN 55364 -1687
Dear City Manager Hanson:
Each year, the Metropolitan Council prepares population and household estimates as of April I of the previous
year. Local governments are invited to review and comment on the preliminary estimates. The Council will
certify final estimates by July 15 for state government use in allocating local government aid and street aid.
Council staff recently discovered that a manufactured housing park located partly in the City Of Mound closed
before April 1, 2013 but was inadvertently included in the preliminary estimates for 2013. As a result, the report
sent to you last week slightly overestimated the number of housing units, households, and persons in your
community. This letter communicates the Council's revised estimate, which replaces the previous version. We
apologize for the inconvenience.
The Metropolitan Council estimates that the City Of Mound had 9,421 people and 4,045 households as of
April 1, 2013. Household size averaged 2.33 persons per household.
As described before, the Council estimates current population and households through changes in the housing
stock, occupancy rates and persons per household. Input data sources include housing stock, manufactured home
parks, and group quarters data maintained by Metropolitan Council Research, as well as U.S. Census Bureau's
American Community Survey data. For more information on the Council's population estimates model, please
visit the Council's website at http: / /stats,metc. state. mn.us /stats /aboutestimates.aspx or contact Matt Schroeder at
651- 602 -1513.
Council staff welcomes discussion of the 2013 preliminary estimates. Under Minnesota Statutes 473.24, the
Metropolitan Council must receive your comments, questions or specific objections, in writing, by June 24.
Please send any written comments or questions to Matt Schroeder, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 North
Robert Street, Saint Paul, MN 55 10 1; or by e -mail to matt.schroeder @mete.state.mn.us
Sincerely,
a
Matt Schroeder
Senior Researcher
w .u_1111- uncil.org
390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 - Fax (651) 602 -1550 o TTY (651) 291 -0904
An Egua( Opportunity Employer
2013 Annual Population Estimates
Mound city, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Households: 4,045 Population in Households: 9,416 Average Household Size:
Housing Total: 4,376 Population in Group Quarters: 5
Occupancy Rate: 92.44% Total Population:
9,421
03.1:3
Metropolitan Council's Annual Estimates account for housing stock changes since April 1, 2010. These include housing units permitted and other
changes. Other changes are due to demolitions, building conversions (units added or lost), city boundary changes (units annexed in or out), and other
changes reported by city and township staff. The Council assumes that 85% of multifamily and 95% of single - family units permitted in 2012 were
completed and occupiable by April 1, 2013; the remainder are occupiable in the future.
Manufactured homes are counted each yearfrom Metropolitan Council surveys of manufactured home park operators and local governments. Other
housing (boats, RVs, etc. used as housing) is an estimate from the most recent Census ACS estimates.
Housing Stock
April 1, 2010
Single- family- detached:
3,273
Townhomes:
253
Duplex, 3 -, 4 -plex units:
103
Multifamily units:
737
Manufactured homes:
13
Other (boats, RVs, etc. as shelter):
0
Housing Total:
4,379
Permitted and Other changes Housing Stock
built since 2010 since 2010 April 1, 2013
10
-13
3,270
0
0
253
0
0
103
0
0
737
Single- family- detached:
0
92.38%
3,021
0
4,376
Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate and average household size. Starting with the 2011 -12 cycle, the primary data are
the most recent American Community Survey estimates, calculated and adjusted as described in the Council's methodology, available online at
http://stats.metc.state.mn.us/stats/aboutestimates.aspx
Definitions: A household is a group of people (or one person alone) occupying a housing unit.
The number of occupied housing units and the number of households are equivalent.
Population in Group Quarters (or institutional housing) is counted separately through an annual Metropolitan Council survey.
Housing Stock
Occupancy
Occupied with
Persons Per
Population in
April 1, 2013
Rate 2013
Households
Household
2013
Single- family- detached:
3,270
92.38%
3,021
2.496
7,540
Townhomes:
253
92.38%
234
2.496
584
Duplex, 3 -, 4 -plex units:
103
99.50%
102
3.412
348
Multifamily units:
737
93.38%
688
1.373
944
Manufactured homes:
0
0.00%
0
5.040
0
Other:
0
Counted only if
0
1,800
0
occupied
Housing Total:
4,376
Households:
4,045
In Households:
9,416
In Group Qtrs:
5
Total Population:
9,421
Metropolitan Council
-1112-
5/15/2014
I
Appropriate Country Club attire and soft spikes are required.
Rain or Shine Tournament
Prevention 2014 H&TONK4 R, e, OPEY
SBM Crime
Attn: i.
Check
Mailing Address
Email
Mailing Address
Email
Mailing Address
Email "
Mailing Address
Email
appropriate box:
Enclosed is my team Fee of $560.00. Team Name
I will sponsor ____Hotels) @ $150 per Hole.
I will help Sponsor the Lunch andfor Dinner. Please Call
I will donate Raffle item(s) worth $30 or more.
I will donate Silent Auction Item(s) worth $50 or more.
1 am unable to attend. Please accept my donation of $
PROCEEDS BENEFIT DRUG & CRIME PREVENTION PROGRAMS
SBM Crime Prevention Fund is a 501(c)3 Organization
For mom tr$ - -tion contact
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable
cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community.
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 22,2014 - 7:00 PM
REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call
vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
Page
1. Open meeting
2. Pledge of Allegiance
0
Q
5.
Approve agenda, with any amendments
*Consent Agenda
*A. Approve payment of claims 1439 -1462
*B. Approve minutes: July 8, 2014 regular meeting 1463 -1464
*C. Approve Public Gathering Permit for Full Throttle Fishing Bass 1465 -1466
Tournament at Centerview Beach, with Surfside Beach as alternate,
with fees paid: Aug 9, 2014
*D. Approve Resolution Approving Variance for 1784 Jones Lane 1467 -1493
*E. Approve Pay Request No. 9 from GMH Asphalt, Inc. in the amount of 1494 -1495
$160,661.60 for work completed on the 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining
Wall Improvement Project, City Project No. PW -13 -01
*F. Adopt Resolution Awarding Contract to Allied Blacktop for the 2014 1496 -1501
Seal Coat Improvement Project in the amount of $84,320, City Project No.
PW -14 -07
*G. Adopt Resolution Awarding Contract to Advanced Wall Structures, Inc. in 1502 -1503
the amount of $123,760.00 for the 3025 Island View Drive Emergency
Retaining Wall Replacement Project
Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda.
(Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.)
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
6. Public Hearin
A. Action on an Ordinance Amending Chapter 129 of the City Code related to 1504 -1512
swimming pool regulations contained in Sec. 129- 196(b)
/. Stacey Kvilvang, representing Ehlers & Associates Financial Advisors, requesting 1513
action on the following resolutions:
A. Resolution Providing for the Sale of $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, 1514 -1528
Series 2014
B. Resolution Providing for the Sale of $3,320,000 General Obligation 1529 -1552
Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
Vern Brandenberg, representing Westonka Historical Society, with presentation
9. Laura Cogswell, representing Westonka Dog Days, with appeal of $300 recommended 1553 -1556
fee, to include action on Public Gathering Permit
10. Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administration, requesting action 1557 -1560
on a Resolution to Approve a Memorandum of Agreement between the City of
Mound and Westonka Public Schools, ISD 9277
11. Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administration, requesting a discussion 1561 -1564
on official meeting records and minute taking.
Information/Miscellaneous
A.
Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager
B.
Minutes:
C.
Reports:
Bolton & Menk Engineering: 2014 YTD
1565
Finance Dept: May 2014 YTD
1566 -1568
Harbor Wine & Spirits: May 2014
1569
D.
Correspondence:
Letter from Mediacom: June 19, 2014
1570
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 2014 Budget
1571 -1592
Letter from City Manager to
City of Spring Park: July 16, 2014
1593
13. Adjourn
Note: This is apreliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More
current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: u.ww. citvofmound.com.
2014
070714CTYMAN
$
418.50
2014
071014CTYMAN
$
960.00
2014
0717CTYMAN
$
31411.19
2014
BOLTMNK06 -14
$
60,519.00
2014
072214CITY
$
199,492.09
2014
072214HWS
$
93,131.78
TOTAL 357,932.S6
-1439-
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $418.50
Total $418.50
SE .e
CITY OF MOUND
07/07/149: 27 AM
_
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: July 2014
Batch Name 070714CTYMAN
User Dollar Amt $418.50
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $418.50
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 FOSS, ALEXANDER L.
_
Cash Payment R 281 - 45210 -34735 Multiple Slip Permits REFUND MULTI SLIP DOCK FEE- A. FOSS
$375.00
Invoice 07072014 7/712014
Cash Payment R281- 45210 -34705 LMCD Fees
REFUND LMCD FEE -A. FOSS
$7.50
Invoice 07072014 7/7/2014
Cash Payment E 10141500 -430 Miscellaneous
REFUND OVERDRAFT FEE -A. FOSS
$36.00
Invoice 07072014 717/2014
Transaction Date 7/7/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$418.50
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$36.00
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
$382.50
$418.50
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $418.50
Total $418.50
SE .e
CITY OF MOUND 07/10/1411:47 AM
Page 1
Payments
G1 t y Or MOUND
Current Period: July 2014
Batch Name 071014CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $960.00
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $960.00
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 MWHS BOYS HOCKEY BOOSTERS_
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies 40 BAGS SALT PELLETS & 40 BAGS $480.00
COARSE SALT- FIRE DEPT
Invoice 07102014 7/9/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -210 Operating Supplies 40 BAGS SALT PELLETS & 40 BAGS $480.00
COARSE SALT- CITY HALL
Invoice 07102014 7/9/2014
Transaction Date 7/10/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $960.00
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND $480.00
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $480.00
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $960.00
Total $960.00
$960.00
-1441-
CITY OF MOUND
07/17114 10:33 AM
-
Payments
Page 1
�' t v' 6�.° li3Elf'ECi
Current
Period: July 2014
Batch Name 0717CTYMAN User
Dollar Amt $3,411.19
Payments Computer
Dollar Amt $3,411.19
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 FRONTIEWCITIZENS COMMUNICA -
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29114
$118.48
Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29114
$67.45
Invoice 07182014 6130/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7129/14
$573.55
Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29114
$418.60
Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29/14
$406.29
Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29/14
$406.29
Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SVC 6130114 TO 7/29/14
$852.32
Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 22242260 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SVC 6/30114 TO 7/29/14
$284.11
Invoice 07182014 6/3012014
Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29/14
$142.05
Invoice 07182014 6130/2014
Cash Payment E 10142110 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SVC 6/30/14 TO 7/29/14
$142.05
Invoice 07182014 6/30/2014
Transaction Date 7/1512014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $3,411.19
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$1,661.19
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
$284.11
601 WATER FUND
$406.29
602 SEWER FUND
$486.05
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$573.55
$3,411.19
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,411.19
Total $3,411.19
-1442-
CITY OF MOUND 07/16/14 9:38 AM
Page 1
Payments
MOUND
Current Period: July 2014
Batch Name BOLTMNK06 -14 User Dollar Amt $60,519.00
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $60,519.00
$0.00 in Balance
Refer 1 BOLTONAND MENK, INCORPORA _
Cash Payment E 402 - 43120 -300 Professional Srvs NSA SYSTEM UPDATE SVCS THRU JUNE 6
2014
Invoice 0167811
6130/2014
Cash Payment
E 675- 49425 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0167816
6/3012014
Cash Payment
E 401 - 43112 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0167817
6/30/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0167808
6/30/2014
Cash Payment
E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0167810
6/30/2014
Transaction Date
7/1512014
Refer
2 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0167813
6/30/2014
Cash Payment
E 401 -43114 -303 Engineering Fees
Invoice 0167824
6/3012014
Cash Payment
E 675 -49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0167823
6/30/2014
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
invoice 0167825
6/30/2014
Cash Payment
E 601- 49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0167826 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 427 - 43121 -303 Engineering Fees
Invoice 0167827 6/3012014
Cash Payment E 401- 43110 -303 Engineering Fees
Invoice 0167828
6130/2014
Cash Payment
E 401 - 43101 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0167814
6/30/2014
Cash Payment
E 401 - 43127 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0167815
6/30/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0167807
6/30/2014
SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU JUNE
62014
2012 NORTH ISLAND STREET PROD. PW 12-
01 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014
Project PW1201
UPDATE STREET & UTILITY MAPS
ENGINEERING THRU JUNE 6 2014
Project 14 -4
STORMWATER UTILITY -SWPPP UPDATE
ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014
$1,087.50
$435.00
$715.00
$2,417.00
$1,311.00
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,965.50
GIS UPDATES ENG SVC THRU JUNE 6 2014
$3,093.00
Project 14 -4
2014 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW14-
$14,39150
01 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014
Project PW 1401
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROV 2014 PROJ
$7,133.50
PW14 -04 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014
Project PW1404
2014 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 14 -03
$1,609.00
ENG SVC THRU JUNE 6 2014
Project PW1403
2014 BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN
$3,542.50
REPLACE PROJ PW 14 -08 ENG SVC THRU
JUNE 6 2014
Project PW1408
2014 CRACK & SEALCOAT IMPROV PROD.
$1,980.00
PW 14 -06 ENG SVC THRU JUNE 6 2014
Project PW1406
2014 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT
$1,084.50
PRO.. PW14 -02 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6
2014
Project PW1402
2011 SW ISLAND STREET PROD PW11 -01
$174.00
ENGINEER SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014
Project PW1101
2011 HIGHLANDS STREET PROJ PW11 -02
$72.50
ENGINEER SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014
Project PW1102
GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JUNE
$1,002.50
62014
-1443-
CITY OF MOUND
07/16/14 9:38 AM
�' -- - -"
Page 2
I,
Payments
Current
Period: July 2014
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs
SANITARY SEWER ENGINEERING SVCS
$192.00
THRU JUNE 6 2014
Invoice 0167807 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -300 Professional Srvs
STORM SEWER ENGINEERING SVCS THRU
$81.00
JUNE 6 2014
Invoice 0167807 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -300 Professional Srvs
WATER ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JUNE 6
$427.50
2014
Invoice 0167807 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW13-
$1,877.50
03 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014
Invoice 0167820 6/30/2014
Project PW1303
Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA
2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW13-
$145.00
04 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014
Invoice 0167821 6/30/2014
Project PW1304
Cash Payment E 401 - 43213 -303 Engineering Fees
2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW13-
$1,111.50
05 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014
Invoice 0167819 6/30/2014
Project PW1305
Cash Payment G 101 -23302 Lecy 1733 Bluebird PC #14 -0 1733 BLUEBIRD LN- WISENHORN ENG SVCS
$72.50
THRU JUNE 6 2014
Invoice 0167809 6/30/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23303 HOPKINS 5030 BARTLETT 5030 BARTLETT- HOPKINS ENG SVCS THRU
$72.50
JUNE 6 2014
Invoice 0167809 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -300 Professional Srvs
MCES FLOWS- PROJECTS,
$870.00
REVIEW /COORDINATION THRU JUNE 6 2014
Invoice 0167822 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -300 Professional Srvs
WATER WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN
$435.00
ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014
Invoice 0167812 6/30/2014
Cash Payment E 401- 43113 -300 Professional Srvs
2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PRO.. PW13-
$15,184.00
01 ENG SVCS THRU JUNE 6 2014
Invoice 0167813 6/30/2014
Project PW1301
Transaction Date 7/1512014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$54,553.50
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$1,147.50
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
$32,735.00
402 MUNICIPAL STAID ST CONSTUCT
$1,087.50
427 SEAL COAT FUND
$1,980.00
601 WATER FUND
$4,405.00
602 SEWER FUND
$10,058.50
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
$9,105.50
$60,519.00
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $60,519.00
Total $60,519.00
-1444-
CITY OF MOUND
07/17/149:53 AM
_.__._. - -...�
Page 1
Payments
,IT '1' Y` i100UN4)
Current Period: July 2014
Batch Name 072214CITY User Dollar
Amt $199,492.09
Payments Computer Dollar
Amt $199,492.09
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 38 AICPA -AMER INST CERT PUB ACC
_
_
Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -433 Dues and Subscriptions
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL C. PAUSCHE AUG
$235.00
2014 THRU JULY 2015
Invoice 07222014 6/23/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$235.00
Refer 39 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY _
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies
COFFEE & CREAMER FIREMEN
$76.00
Invoice 1184572 7/9/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$76.00
Refer 1 BURMA, ORVIN & CAROL _
Cash Payment E 401 -43113 -300 Professional Srvs
REIMS REPAIR SPRINKLER SYSTEM
$125.00
DAMAGED DURING 2013 STREET PROJ
Invoice 07222014 717/2014
Project PWI301
Transaction Date 7/1412014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$125.00
Refer CARQUESTAUTO PARTS (FIRE) _
_2
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair
OIL FILTER FOR FIRE STATION GENERATOR
$8.38
P Invoice 6974 - 228372 6/13/2014
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair
at EDDIES AUTO REPAIR
$7.64
Invoice 6974- 229369 6/27/2014
Transaction Date 7/14/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$16.02
Refer 3 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (PANJ _
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts
UPPER CYCLE LURE & NJ CLNR, DIESEL
$35.39
KLEEN CETANE- PARKS
Invoice 6974 - 229109 6/24/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR PARKS TRAILERS
$18.04
Invoice 6974 - 229037 6/24/2014
Transaction Date 7/14/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$53.43
Refer 4 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR _
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER RENTAL
$15.60
Invoice 00022695 6/30/2014
Project 14 -3
Transaction Date 2/18/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$15.60
Refer 5 DURKIN, DAVID _
Cash Payment E 401 -43113 -300 Professional Srvs
RESTACK EXISTING MODULAR WALL- 3012
$4,065.00
DEVON
Invoice 07222014 719/2014
Project PW1301
Transaction Date 7/14/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
_
$4,065.00
.. ._...
Refer 40 FIRE CATT LLC.....
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic
FIRE HOSE TESTING- 16,725 FEET 6 -25 & 6-
$4,850.25
26 -14
Invoice MN -4359 6127/2014 PO 24411
r Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$4,850.25
Refer 41 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS
-1445-
CITY OF MOUND
07/17/149:53 AM
- - ---
SVC JUNE 2014
Page 2
Payments
A
Cash Payment G 101 -23301 Perf. Pool - 5024 Tuxedo 14-
524 TUXEDO BLVD POOL COVER VAR
Cli,N OF MOUND
PLANNING SVCS JUNE 2014
Current Period: July 2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -434 Conference & Training
COMMUNICATION SKILLS FOR WOMEN
$49.00
2201 CENTERVIEW LANE SUBDV PLANNING
SEMINAR- K. HANSON 6 -18 -14 ST. CLOUD
Invoice 15754161 70/2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$49.00
Refer 7 G & K SERVICES _
$145.25
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services
MAT SVC 7 -14 -14 LIQUOR STORE
$70.88
Invoice 1006403207 7/14/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23303 HOPKINS 5030 BARTLETT
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services
MAT SVC 7 -07 -14 LIQUOR STORE
$76.97
Invoice 1006391837 7/7/2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014
Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -460 Janitorial Services
MAT SVC 7 -07 -14 FIRE DEPT
$38.81
Invoice 1006391842 7/7/2014
Transaction Date 7/14/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$186.66
Refer 8 GOVDELIVERY
Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -440 Other Contractual Servic
EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION MGMT SYSTEM
$2,200.00
ANNUAL HOSTING & MTCE FEE
Invoice 2465 7/2/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -440 Other Contractual Servic
EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION MGMT SYSTEM- SET
$1,000.00
UP FEE
Invoice 2465 7/2/2014
_
Transaction Date 7/14/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,200.00
Refer 9 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO _
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -418 Other Rentals
PW RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE -
$127.20
JUNE 2014
Invoice 1000047285 7/1/2014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -418 Other Rentals
FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE &
$790.26
ADMINISTRATION FEE - JUNE 2014
Invoice 1000047217 7/1/2014
Transaction Date 7/14/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$917.46
Refer 10 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I _
Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -300 Professional Srvs
MISC PLANNING SVCS JUNE 2014
$269.75
Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23289 WERTH 5116 WATERBURY
5116 WATERBURY PLANNING SVCS
$20.75
TECHNIQUE CONST JUNE 2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23298 BENCHMARK -2308 DRIFTW 2308 DRIFTWOOD EXP PERMIT PLANNING
$145.25
SVC JUNE 2014
Invoice 007- 005 -70 7/8/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23301 Perf. Pool - 5024 Tuxedo 14-
524 TUXEDO BLVD POOL COVER VAR
$103.75
PLANNING SVCS JUNE 2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23300 KING2201 CENTERVIEW C
2201 CENTERVIEW LANE SUBDV PLANNING
$41.50
SVCS JUNE 2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23302 Lacy 1733 Bluebird PC #14 -0
1733 BLUEBIRD- WISENHORN VAR
$145.25
PLANNING SVCS JUNE 2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/812014
Cash Payment G 101 -23303 HOPKINS 5030 BARTLETT
5030 BARTLETT VAR - HOPKINS PLANNING
$124.50
SVCS JUNE 2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014
SEEM
CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:53 AM
- ._._..,` Page 3
Payments
"tn of- MOUND
Current Period: July 2014
Cash Payment G 101 -23305 4861 SHORELINE #14 -10 & 4861 SHORELINE ERICKSON -EP VAR $124.50
PLANNING SVCS JUNE 2014
Invoice 007 - 005 -70 7/8/2014
Transaction Date 7/14/2014
Refer 11 JANI -KING OF MINNESOTA, INCOR
Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice MIN07140470 7/112014
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice MIN07140470 7/1/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice MIN07140471 7/1/2014
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -460 Janitorial Services
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$975.25
MONTHLY
CLEANING CITY
HALL JULY 2014
$700.00
MONTHLY CLEANING FIRE DEPT JULY 2014
MONTHLY CLEANING CENT BLDG JULY 2014
MONTHLY CLEANING PUB WRKS BLDG
JULY 2014
Invoice MIN07140472 7/1/2014
Project 14 -3
Transaction Date 7/14/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 14 JUBILEE FOODS
TABLECLOTH TASTING PROMO EVENT
Cash Payment E 609-49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE
Invoice 07222014 6/14/2014
LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
AIR SOCCER BALL- PROMO EVENT
Invoice 07222014 6/13/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
`. Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
MERCHANDISE DISPLAY BASKET
Invoice 07222014 6/14/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
RETURN MERCHANDISE DISPLAY BASKET
Invoice 07222014 6/14/2014
Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -430 Miscellaneous
EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION BBQ LUNCH
DELI, PLATES, LEMONDADE
Invoice 07222014 6/19/2014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
GATORADE, POWERADE FIREMEN
Invoice 07222014 6/23/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies
TABLECLOTH TASTING PROMO EVENT
Invoice 07222014 6/24/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE
Invoice 07222014 6/25/2014
Transaction Date 7114/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 45 KIVISTO, SCOTT
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -438 Licenses and Taxes
Invoice 07222014 7115/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Refer 12 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T
Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -361 General Liability Ins
Invoice 47332 7/1/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -361 General Liability Ins
Invoice 47332 7/1/2014
Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -361 General Liability Ins
Invoice 47332 7/1/2014
$700.00
$476.00
$258.83
$2,134.83
$60.00
$2.99
$2.67
-$2.67
$81.81
$39.10
$6.39
$58.00
$248.29
REIMB DRIVERS LICENSE UPGRADE TO $11.0c
CLASS B & ENDORSEMENTS- S. KIVISTO
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11.00
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $2,139.30
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
-1447-
$285.24
$770.15
CITY OF MOUND
07/17/149:53 AM
-
-"- � 1
Page
Payments
Current Period: July 2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 41600 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$142.62
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41910 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$313.77
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 42110 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$1,426.20
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
711/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 42115 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$85.57
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 42400 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$741.62
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -43100 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$4,706.46
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$1,055.39
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 222- 42260 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$5,704.81
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 281 - 45210 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$487.48
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 285 - 46388 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$41.65
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 601- 49400 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$4,763.51
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$4,421.22
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$7,058.56
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41930 -361 General Liability Ins
3RD INSTALLMENT 2014 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1-
$1,426.20
14 THRU 2 -1 -15
Invoice 47332
7/1/2014
Transaction Date
7/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$35,569.75
Refer 13 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T
_
Cash Payment
E 101- 42400 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc
3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$621.71
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27816
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -43100 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc
3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$7,211.80
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27816
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc
3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$3,063.77
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27816
7/1/2014
-1448-
Invoice 1779714 7/3/2014
Cash Payment
CITY OF MOUND
07/17/149:53 AM
$109.89
Page 5
OVERAGE - 6/14/1.4 TO 7113/14
Payments
Invoice 1779714
7/3/2014
�x M
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -202 Duplicating and copying
KONICA MINOLTA 8200 PW COPIER
$2.62
Current Period: July 2014
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$6,911.15
7/1/2014
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27816
7/1/2014
CABLE CENTENNIAL BLDG FOR UHL
Cash Payment
E 281 -45210 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$397.89
CONTROLS
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice CW25675 6/24/2014
Invoice 27816
7/1/2014
Transaction Date
Cash Payment
E 601 -49400 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$3,485.04
Refer 16 MEDIACOM _
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27816
7/1/2014
ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 7 -16 -14 THRU 8-
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$7,211.80
15 -14
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27816
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -151 Worker s Camp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$2,287.88
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27816
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 675 -49425 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$65.65
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27816
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -41110 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$13.68
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27816
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41310 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$621.71
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27816
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101-41500-151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$746.05
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27816
7/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -42110 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP INS 2-
$497.37
1 -14 TO 2 -1 -15
Invoice 27816
7/112014
Transaction Date 7/1 512 01 4 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$33,135.50
Refer
15 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR _
Cash Payment
E 101 -41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - COLOR
$103.86
OVERAGE - 6/14/14 TO 7/13/14
Invoice 1779714 7/3/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -41930 -202 Duplicating and copying
COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - BAN
$109.89
OVERAGE - 6/14/1.4 TO 7113/14
Invoice 1779714
7/3/2014
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -202 Duplicating and copying
KONICA MINOLTA 8200 PW COPIER
$2.62
OVERAGE CHG 6 -10 -14 TO 7 -9 -14
Invoice 1777621
7/1/2014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment
E 101 -41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic
CABLE CENTENNIAL BLDG FOR UHL
$313.52
CONTROLS
Invoice CW25675 6/24/2014
-_
Transaction Date
2/19/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$529.89
Refer 16 MEDIACOM _
Cash Payment
E 101 -42110 -321 Telephone & Cells
ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 7 -16 -14 THRU 8-
$85.90
15 -14
Invoice 07222014 7/612014
Transaction Date 7115/2014
Refer 17 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SAC CH _
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $85.90
-1449-
CITY OF MOUND
07/17/149:53 AM
- --
Page 6
Payments
Current Period: July 2014
Cash Payment G 602 -21825 SAC Deposits
SAC CHARGES 2ND QTR 2014
$7,380.45
Invoice 06302014 717/2014
Transaction Date 1/9/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$7,380.45
Refer 18 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE _
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS
WASTEWATER SERVICES AUGUST 2014
$51,406.04
Invoice 0001036010 7/712014
Transaction Date 1/21/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$51,406.04
Refer 44 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERA
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -433 Dues and Subscriptions
JULY 2014 TO JULY 2015 MN MUNICIPAL
$1,440.00
BEVERAGE ASSOC ANNUAL DUES
Invoice 07222014 7/15/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo - 10100 Total
$1,440.00
Refer 19 MINNESOTA UNEMPLOYMENT INS _
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -140 Unemployment Comp
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 2ND QTR
$129.67
2014 E. STRICKLAND
Invoice 07222014 7/8/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -140 Unemployment Comp
UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PAID 2ND QTR
$1,106.04
2014 K. EZAKI
Invoice 07222014 718/2014
Transaction Date 7115/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,235.71
Refer 20 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA _
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic
SURFACE WATER TESTS - MOUND /MCES
$1,488.00
SYSTEM OVER CAPACITY- REPORT 7 -1 -14
Invoice 709678 7/3/2014
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic
SURFACE WATER TESTS - MOUND /MCES
$1,488.00
SYSTEM OVER CAPACITY- REPORT 7 -1 -14
Invoice 709679 7/3/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic
SURFACE WATER TESTS - MOUND /MCES
$1,488.00
SYSTEM OVER CAPACITY- REPORT 7 -7 -14
Invoice 710129 7/8/2014
Transaction Date 7/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$4,464.00
Refer 34 MINUTEMAN PRESS _
Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -203 Printed Forms
500 WARNING NOTICE TICKETS- CODE
$204.71
ENFORCEMENT
Invoice 16269 7/3/2014
Transaction Date 7/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$20431
Refer 21 MNSPECT _
Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees
JUNE 2014 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES
$8,296.19
Invoice 6339 7/8/2014
Cash Payment G 101 -20800 Due to Other Governments
JUNE 2014 - ELECTRICAL STATE
$125.00
SURCHARGE FEE CREDIT
Invoice 6339 7/8/2014
Cash Payment R 101- 42000 -32220 Electrical Permit Fee JUNE 2014 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION - $399.00
PERMIT FEE CREDITS
Invoice 6339 7/8/2014
Transaction Date 7115/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,772.19
Refer 22 MOUND FIRE RELIEFASSOCIATIO _
-1450-
CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:53 AM
Page 7
IL Payments
CITY C1FhA0UKD
Current Period: July 2014
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib JULY 2014 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION $12,250.00
CONTRIBUTION
Invoice 07222014 7/1/2014
Transaction Date 7115/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,250.00
Refer 23 MULCH STORE, THE _
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -232 Landscape Material HONEY GOLD CONTRACTOR MULCH FOR $1,073.00
PARKS -29 CUBIC YDS
Invoice 15689 6130/2014
Transaction Date 7/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,073.00
Refer 25 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE)
_
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -200 Office Supplies
FILE FOLDERS, PENS, COPY PAPER,
$82.79
LABELS, TAPE
Invoice 718678595001 7/2/2014 PO 24412
Cash Payment E22242260-210 Operating Supplies
9V BATTERIES
$17.53
Invoice 718678595001 7/2/2014 PO 24412
Transaction Date 7/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$100.32
Refer 24 OFFICEDEPOT
_
Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -200 Office Supplies
9 X 12 ENVELOPES, WRITING PADS, LID
$33.56
PAPER CX
Invoice 718423028001 7/1/2014 PO 24379
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -200 Office Supplies
Invoice 718423028001 711/2014 PO 24379
Transaction Date 2/4/2014
Refer 42 OFFICEDEPOT
Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -200 Office Supplies
Invoice 718924731001 7/7/2014 PO 24380
Cash Payment E 101- 41410 -200 Office Supplies
Invoice 718924731001 717/2014 PO 24380
Cash Payment G 101 -22802 Festival
Invoice 718924731001 717/2014 PO 24380
BLACK, YELLOW, CYAN, MAGENTA TONER $218.34
CARTRIDGES- PUB WKS
Project 14 -5
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $251.90
COLORED COPY PAPER, HIGHLIGHTERS $23.04
DYMO LABELS $15.89
NAME TAGS - SPIRIT OF THE LAKES $24.58
FESTIVAL
Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $63.51
Refer 26 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS
Cash Payment E602- 49450 -322 Postage JUNE 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $326.08
Invoice 140630 715/2014
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute JUNE 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,751.52
PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT
Invoice 140630 7/5/2014
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute JUNE 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,751.52
PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT
Invoice 140630 7/5/2014
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -322 Postage
Invoice 140630 7/5/2014
Transaction Date 7/15/2014
Refer 27 ORONO, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -450 Board of Prisoners
Invoice 20140106 6/30/2014
JUNE 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $326.08
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,15520
HENNEP CTY JAIL CHARGES- PER DIEM $100.55
FEES MAY 2014
-1451-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
"VIN OF YWILI€ G
07/17/14 9:53 AM
Page 8
Current Period: July 2014
Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.55
Refer 28 POTTS, KENNETH N. P.A
Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -304 Legal Fees
Invoice 07222014 7/1/2014
Transaction Date 7/15/2014
Refer 29 STANCHFIELD, RONALD
Cash Payment E 281- 45210 -331 Use of personal auto
2ND QTR 2014 PROSECUTION SVCS $12,500.00
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,500.00
REIMB MILEAGE- DOCK INSPECTION 6 -11 $47.60
THRU 7 -3 - R. STANCHFIELD
Invoice 07222014 7/7/2014
Transaction Date 7/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47.60
Refer
30 SUN NEWSPAPERS -HWS ACCT,
Invoice 116024
_
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -328 Employment Advertising
SALESCLERK HELP WANTED AD- HWS 6 -7-
Invoice 116719
7/3/2014
14
Invoice 232704
617/2014
719/2014
Transaction Date
7/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer_ 43 SUN PATRIOTNEWSPAPER -CITY _
E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
Cash Payment
E 101- 41410 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
ELECTION - CANDIDATE FILING DATES -
E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 115844
PUBLIC NOTICE 7 -12 -14
Invoice 119563
7/12/2014
Refer 46
Cash Payment
E 10142400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
PUB NTCE SWIMMING POOL REGS ZONING
AMENDMENT 7 -12 -14
Invoice 119564
7112/2014
Transaction Date
7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 31 TRADEMARK TITLE SVCS, INC.
Cash Payment
R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu
REFUND UTILITY CREDIT- 2137 NOBLE.
TRADEMARK TITLE
Invoice 07222014
7/1412014
Transaction Date
7/15/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Refer 35 TRUE VALUE HWS
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 116024
6/12/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 116719
7/3/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 116874
719/2014
Transaction Date
7/15/2014
Refer 36 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE)
Cash Payment
E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 115842
6/7/2014
Cash Payment
E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 115844
6/712014
Transaction Date
7/15/2014
Refer 46
TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE)
Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow
Invoice 115805 6/6/2014
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GE 6 PK FLD LIGHTS, 13W CFL, PERMATEX
TRASH BAGS, DOG TREATS
$111.00
$111.00
$23.13
$30.84
$53.97
$529.60
$529.60
$28.83
$48.06
$24.56
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $101.45
ELECTRIC BALLAST $69.98
PIPE WRENCH, THREAD SEAL, GAS TAPE $31.47
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $101,45
FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO $21.99
REIMB- BROOM
-1452-
CITY OF MOUND
07/17/14 9:53 AM
-- - -�,,,
Page 9
Payments
C Y
OF MOUND
Current Period: July 2014
Cash Payment
G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow
FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO
$32.34
REIMB- OUTLETS FOR TENTS
Invoice 115834
6/6/2014
Cash Payment
G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow
FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO
$20.37
REIMB- CLEANER
Invoice 115843
6/7/2014
Cash Payment
G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow
FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO
$28.97
REIMB- APPL CORD, FOIL TAPE
Invoice 115845
61712014
Cash Payment
G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow
FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO
$11.98
REIMB- HD STAPLES
Invoice 115846
6/7/2014
Cash Payment
G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow
FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO
$39.62
REIMB- TERMOMETER, DUCT TAPE,
BLEACH, SCOUR PAD
Invoice 115847
6/7/2014
Cash Payment
G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow
FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO
$12.48
REIMB- PAPER TOWEL HOLDER, FOAM
MOUNT TAPE
Invoice 115848
6/7/2014
Cash Payment
G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow
FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO
$6.99
REIMB- DROP OUTLET
't.. Invoice 115851
6/7/2014
Cash Payment
G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow
FISH FRY SUPPLIES- FIRE RELIEF TO
$17.99
REIMB- ANTENNA
Invoice 115854
6/7/2014
Transaction Date 7/17/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$192.73
Refer
37 TRUE VALUE, MOUND(PWPKS)
_
Cash payment
E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials
FUNNEL
$5.58
Invoice 115622
6/1/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -43100 -230 Shop Materials
TUNG SCRIBER & MAGNET
$9.49
Invoice 115659
6/3/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 45200 -409 Other Equipment Repair LAWN MOWER BLADE SHARPENING, PVC
$13.39
PIPE
Invoice 115678
6/3/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies
DEHUMIDIFIER, BOX FAN
$282.99
Invoice 115678
6/312014
Cash Payment
E 601- 49400 -230 Shop Materials
WIRE BRUSH, CROSS PEIN HAMMER, FHP V
$35.97
BELT
Invoice 115714
6/4/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
ROUNDUP SPRAY
$54.99
Invoice 115809
6/6/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 -43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
CONCRETE FORM TUBE
$29.98
Invoice 115892
6/9/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -220 Repair[Maint Supply
AMONIA, KEY RING
$15.52
Invoice 115902
6/9/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, BITS
$7.97
Invoice 115948
6110/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, BITS
$2.65
Invoice 115970
6/11/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -232 Landscape Material
60LB CONCRETE MIX
$27.45
Invoice 115970
6/11/2014
-1453-
Invoice 116169 6/17/2014
Cash Payment
CITY OF MOUND
07/17/149:53 AM
$43.71
Invoice 116347
6/23/2014
Page 10
Invoice 116185
Payments
Project 14 -3
$4.49
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, APPL BULB, 60W
$9.38
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
BULBS
$7.49
Invoice 116221
6119/2014
Invoice 28154
Current Period: July 2014
E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies
LYSOL WIPES
$6.99
Invoice 116016
6/12/2014
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
COWHIDE GLOVES
$4.58
Invoice 116016
6/12/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -210 Operating Supplies
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
SELECT SHOCK
$20.97
Invoice 116035
6/12/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies
Cash Payment
E 285 - 46388 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, PINE SOL
$1165
Invoice 116050
6/13/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41110 -430 Miscellaneous
SCISSORS- RIBBON CUTTING CEREMONY
$23.95
Invoice 116063
6/13/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -232 Landscape Material
BLOOM BOOSTER- HANGING BASKETS
$12.99
Invoice 116064
6/13/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS
$6.99
Invoice 116160
6/17/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
SUMP PUMP, CONNECTOR, BUSHING, EYE
$188.96
LAG BT- PARKS
Invoice 116169 6/17/2014
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials
SOAP, SPONGE, ACID BRUSH, AJAX,
$43.71
Invoice 116347
6/23/2014
SIMPLE GREEN CLEANERS
Invoice 116185
6/18/2014
Project 14 -3
$4.49
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, APPL BULB, 60W
$9.38
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
BULBS
$7.49
Invoice 116221
6119/2014
Invoice 28154
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
6 MIL BULK SHEETING
$67.98
Invoice 116244
6/19/2014
RAMP
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies
4 MIL BULK SHEETING
$29.98
Invoice 116250
6/19/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -210 Operating Supplies
APPL CORD, ELEC TAPE
$17.48
Invoice 116260
6/19/2014
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies
SUMP PUMP, CONNECTOR, BUSHING,
$456.61
GARDEN HOSE AMONIA- PARKS
Invoice 116283 6/20/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials
CLOTHESLINE
$4.49
Invoice 116347
6/23/2014
Project 14 -3
Cash Payment
E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials
CLOTHESLINE
$4.49
Invoice 116348
6/23/2014
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
EXT MOUNT TAPE
$7.49
Invoice 116404
6/2412014
Invoice 28154
Cash Payment
E 285- 46388 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
CLEANER & SCRUB SPONGE- PARKING
$18.98
E 101 - 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance
PREVENTATIVE MTCE CONTRACT- CITY
RAMP
Invoice 116430 6/25/2014
Cash Payment
E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials
CREDIT ADJ
-$1.10
Invoice 063014
6/30/2014
Project 14 -3
Transaction Date 7/1512014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
.
$1,424.55
Refer
32 UHL COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 222 - 42260 -402 Building Maintenance
PREVENTATIVE MTCE CONTRACT- FIRE
$531.25
DEPT 3RD QTR 2014
Invoice 28154
7/10/2014
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance
PREVENTATIVE MTCE CONTRACT- CITY
$531.25
HALL 3RD QTR 2014
Invoice 28154
7/1012014
-1454-
Transaction Date 7/1512014
Refer 33 XCEL ENERGY
CITY OF MOUND 07/17/14 9:53 AM
Page 11
Payments
Current Period: July 2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,062.50
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities 5341 MAYWOOD RD STREET LIGHTS- 6 -3 -14 $4,989.83
TO 7 -2 -14
Invoice 418564263 7/3/2014
Transaction Date 7/1512014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,989.83
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$60,937.85
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
$32,302.15
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
$932.97
285 MOUND HRA
$74.28
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
$4,190.00
601 WATER FUND
$10,891.72
602 SEWER FUND
$77,717.31
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$12,380.16
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
$65.65
$199,492.09
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $199,492.09
Total $199,492.09
-1455-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: July 2014
07/17/14 9:47 AM
Page 1
Batch Name 072214HWS User Dollar Amt $93,131.78
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $93,131.78
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 2 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $53.60
Invoice 466419217 7/11/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $79.00
Invoice 388419505 7/1412014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $132.60
Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$159.00
Invoice 385418412 7/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
FREIGHT
$1.00
Invoice 385418412 7/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$165.70
Invoice 387418506 7/4/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.00
Invoice 387418506 7/4/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$87.60
Invoice 385418603 7/5/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.00
Invoice 385418603 7/5/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$119.15
Invoice 387418805 717/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.00
Invoice 387418805 717/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$37.95
Invoice 385419103 711012014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.00
Invoice 385419103 7/10/2014
Transaction Date 7/1612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$574.40
Refer 3 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$277.35
Invoice 57172 711/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$277.35
Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
BAGS, SUPPLIES
$49.67
Invoice 90497300 7/11/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
$22.00
Invoice 90497300 7/11/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
MERCHANDISE SHOT GLASSES
$117.00
Invoice 90497300 7/11/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
MERCH- 3 QT COOLER
$85.20
Invoice 90461100 7/7/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies
BAGS
$47.00
Invoice 90461100 7/7/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
MERCH- CORKSCREWS, JIGGERS, FLASKS
$82.50
Invoice 90504000 7/14/2014
-1456-
CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:47 AM
Page 2
Payments
Current Period: July 2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$29.00
Invoice 90504000 7/14/2014
Refer
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$130.89
Invoice 90461000
7/7/2014
BEER
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX
$35.00
Invoice 43793300
7/7/2014
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
$5,188.79
Invoice 43793300 7/7/2014
7/11/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
$1,021.70
Invoice 43882600 7/11/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT
$12.30
Invoice 43882600 7/11/2014
Transaction Date
7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$6,821.05
Refer
5 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN _
7/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$127.15
Invoice 145761
7/2/2014
$2,135.90
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
$979.10
Invoice 145762
7/2/2014
E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$166.35
Invoice 148712
7/16/2014
Transaction Date
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
$749.18
Invoice 148713
7/16/2014
_
Transaction Date
7/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$2,021.78
Refer
6 BLU SKY PUBLISHING _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising 114 PAGE AD JULY 2014 WEST LAKE
$140.00
BUSINESS PUBLICATION
Invoice 16119
6/30/2014
Transaction Date
7/1612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$140.00
Refer 7 COCA COLA BOTTLING- MIDWEST _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX
Invoice 0138127406 7/10/2014
$185.44
Transaction Date
7/1612014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total. $185.44
Refer
8 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC
_
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$650.00
Invoice 1092741
7/14/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$49.00
Invoice 94483
7/11/2014
Transaction Date
7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $699.00
Refer
9 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
_
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$1,753.15
Invoice 759774
7/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,135.90
Invoice 760643
7/15/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$73.80
I Invoice 760644
7/15/2014
Transaction Date
7/1612014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $3,962.85
Refer 10
EXTREME BEVERAGE
_
-1457-
_ CITY OF MOUND 07/17/14 R47 AM
Page 3
\ \ Payments
Current Period: July 2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$179.00
Invoice 991510
71912014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $179.00
Refer_
17 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA
-
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$344.00
Invoice 169193
7/14/2014
Refer 18 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN
_
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$4.50
Invoice 169193
7/1412014
Invoice 2239926 7/15/2014
Transaction Date
7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $348.50
Refer
11 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$1,309.00
Invoice 711509
7/9/2014
Transaction Date
7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $1,309.00
Refer 13 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING MINN
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$80.00
Invoice 2225996 7/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$237.00
Invoice 2239865 7/3/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$317.00
Refer 18 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,41725
Invoice 2239926 7/15/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$197.60
Invoice 2239927 7/15/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
- $59.00
Invoice 2229746 7/11/2014
Transaction Date 7116/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$3,555.85
Refer 12 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN
_
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$25.50
Invoice 2239883 7/812014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa
MIX
$77.60
Invoice 2239883 7/8/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,291.47
Invoice 2239882 7/8/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$3,394.57
Refer 15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$4,701.43
Invoice 1891648 7/2/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$4,927.10
Invoice 1891649 7/2/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$20.99
Invoice 1891650 7/2/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$64.50
Invoice 1891651 7/212014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$9,714.02
Refer 14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _
-1458-
CITY OF MOUND 07/171149:47 AM
Page 4
pp'b�,� {�� Payments
Lei E S� E11�
MOUND
Current Period: July 2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX
$60.50
Invoice 1895766
7/9/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$7,358.89
Invoice 1895762
7/9/2014
DELIVERY SVC 6 -30 -14
$92.80
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$3,917.40
Invoice 1895763
7/9/2014
Refer 20 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$36.00
Invoice 1895765
7/9/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$41.98
Invoice 1895764
7/9/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -412 Building Rentals
AUG 2014 COMMON AREA MTCE &
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
-$1.38
Invoice 625000
7/3/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
- $11.73
Invoice 623951
6/26/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$188.00
Invoice 1896278
7/10/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
- $36.00
Invoice 625184
7/7/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT
-$6.08
Invoice 625185
7/712014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
- $84.00
Invoice 625186
77712014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
-$5.38
Invoice 625187
7/7/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
-$9.00
Invoice 625188
7/7/2014
Transaction Date
7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $11,449.20
Refer 16
LAKE MONSTER BREWING
_
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$260.00
Invoice 1506
7/312014
Transaction Date
7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $260.00
Refer 19 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 6 -19 -14
$306.25
Invoice 30394 6119/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 6 -26 -14
$219.45
Invoice 30419 6126/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 6 -30 -14
$92.80
Invoice 30430 6/30/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$618.50
Refer 20 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic
WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 6 -2 -14
$51.30
Invoice 928025749 6/22/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$51.30
Refer 21 MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSOC _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -412 Building Rentals
AUG 2014 COMMON AREA MTCE &
$1,045,50
INSURANCE HWS
Invoice 08012014 811/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Far— 10100 Total
$1,045.50
-1459-
CITY OF MOUND 07/17/14 9:47 AM
...\ Page 5
Payments
Current Period: July 2014
Refer 22 PARLEY LAKE WINERY
_
FREIGHT
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$411.00
Invoice 14075 712/2014
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $411.00
24 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE CO_MPA_
E 60949750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
_Refer
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$790.81
Invoice 8456845 7/14/2014
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT
Invoice 8455990
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$12.50
Invoice 8456845 7/14/2014
Wells Fargo
Refer 26 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Transaction Date 7116/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $803.31
Refer 23 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _
Invoice 2631098
7/2/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$285.39
Invoice 8456154 7/8/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
Invoice 8456154
7/8/2014
25 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 8455895
7/7/2014
$663.10
Cash Payment
E 60949750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
Invoice 8455895
7/7/2014
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT
Invoice 8455990
7/8/2014
Transaction Date
7/16/2014
Wells Fargo
Refer 26 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
_
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 2631098
7/2/2014
7/16/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Invoice 2631097
7/2/2014
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
Invoice 2631099
7/2/2014
7/10/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 2631099 7/2/2014
$2.25
$205.48
$7.00
-$7.84
10100 Total $492,28
$407.80
$348.30
$41.95
$56.00
Transaction Date
7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $854.05
Refer
25 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
_
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$663.10
Invoice 2633718
7/912014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$2,092.85
Invoice 2633719
7/912014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$151.75
Invoice 2633718
7/912014
Transaction Date
7/16/2014
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $2,907.70
Refer 27 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M
_
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$2,200.75
Invoice 1180422
7/10/2014
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$2,152.48
Invoice 1180423
7/10/2014
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
MIX
$36.14
Invoice 1180424
7/10/2014
-1460-
CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:47 AM
$ Page 6
Payments
Current Period: July 2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$569.03
Invoice 1178702 713/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,792.00
Invoice 1178703 7/3/2014
Transaction Date 7/1612014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$6,750.40
Refer 28 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
_
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
- $62.99
Invoice 835600 7/15/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$181.05
Invoice 835601 7/15/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$91.40
Invoice 835602 7/15/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$110.00
Invoice 835603 7/15/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$5,054.45
Invoice 835604 7/15/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
- $144.05
Invoice 00751247 7/15/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$5,229.86
29 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
_
_Refer
kll Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$10,353.81
Invoice 834044 71812014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$340.00
Invoice 828375 6/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$527.50
Invoice 833576 7/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEET
$123.00
Invoice 833576 7/3/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$11,344.31
30 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED
_
_Refer
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$316.00
Invoice 0101967 7/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$10.00
Invoice 0101967 7/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$212.00
Invoice 0102309 7/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$5.00
Invoice 0102309 7/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$212.00
Invoice 0102310 7/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2.50
Invoice 0102310 7/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa
SODA
$7150
Invoice 0102311 7/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$5.00
r Invoice 0102311 7/10/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$836.00
Refer 31 WINE COMPANY
- -
-1461-
_ CITY OF MOUND 07/17/149:47 AM
_I Page 7
', Payments
1 Off°'I CTNr
Current Period: July 2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$188.00
Invoice 365856 7/312014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$4.20
Invoice 365856 7/3/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$448.00
Invoice 366224 7/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$8.40
Invoice 366224 7/10/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$648.60
Refer 32 WINEMERCHANTS
_-
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$891.00
Invoice 509850 7/2/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,409.01
Invoice 510482 7/9/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$2,300.01
Refer 33 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER
_
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,106.75
Invoice 1090256646 7/16/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$304.80
Invoice 1090256647 7/16/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$43.00
Invoice 1090256648 7/16/2014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$80.00
Invoice 1090256649 7/16/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$246.00
Invoice 1090253040 7/9/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$5,497.60
Invoice 1090253039 7/9/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$9,278.15
Refer 34 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT -
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,015.96
Invoice 1080201789 7/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$2,003.84
Invoice 1080201788 7/10/2014
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$622.00
Invoice 1080198939 7/212014
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$577.40
Invoice 1080198938 7/2/2014
Transaction Date 7/16/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$4,219.20
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$93,131.78
$93,131.78
Pre - Written Check $0,00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $93,131.78
Total $93,131,78
-1462-
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
July 8, 2014
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on
Tuesday, July 8, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building.
Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Keiji
Gillispie and Ray Salazar
Members absent: None
Others present: Fin Dir /Clerk/Treasurer /Acting City Manager Catherine Pausche, John Beise,
Theresa Malloy, Jay Green, Andy Weigman, Dedra Brey, Art Saunders, Peter Meyer, Cindy
Pugh, Sheriff Richard Stanek
Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in
nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a
Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent
Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
1. Open meeting
Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approve agenda
Pausche asked for item 7 on the agenda to be removed and item 7A to be added.
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in
favor. Motion carried.
4. Consent agenda
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call vote,
all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $214,666.73.
B. Approve minutes of the June 24, 2014 regular meeting.
C. Approve final pay request from Precision Seal Coating, Inc. in the amount of $9,407.50
for work completed on the 2014 Crack Seal Project, City Project No. PW- 14 -06.
D. Approve water tower lease agreement with Verizon Wireless.
E. Approve amendment to Temporary Sign Permit for Spirit of the Lakes Festival for
additional banner locations with fee waived.
F. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -52: RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES AS
RECOMMENDED FOR THE PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTION — AUGUST 12,
2014 AND NOVEMBER 4, 2104.
1463-
Mound City Council Minutes — July 8, 2014
Gillispie questioned the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) water level prediction
and when it will get below 930.0. Green said the three day requirement was written in the
ordinance so that it could be automatically lifted without board action. Hanus said that also
gives greater assurance the issue is resolved. Hanus said the probability of a significant rain
event should be considered.
Weigman suggested enforcement should be situational and only look at the bay that the event is
in. Weigman requested the Mound Council make a statement about under what conditions a
waiver should be granted. Salazar does not want to grant a waiver. Gillispie said if the direction
of decline continues, she is in support of a waiver. Gesch said she wants to be consistent for all
users, but is flexible on giving up on the three day requirement. Wegscheid agreed.
8. Information /Miscellaneous
Mayor Hanus invited State Representative Cindy Pugh to address the Council. Pugh thanked
the Council for all of the efforts regarding the waste water issue, particularly the responsiveness
and communication efforts.
A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager:
Hanus said he sent a letter to The Laker indicating he would not seek reelection. Hanus
summarized the contents of the letter and said the City's future is bright and positive. Hanus
said he had done much of what he wanted to do and it is time for fresh blood and energy.
Hanus wanted people to know in advance so they could consider running for office. Salazar
thanked Hanus for his service.
Pausche stated that candidate filing will take place from July 29th through August 12th at City
Hall.
B. Minutes: Planning Commission: June 3, 2014
C. Reports:
D. Correspondence: 2014 Spirit of the Lakes Festival Schedule
9. Adjourn
MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Wegscheid, to adjourn at 8:33 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
-1464-
Mayor Mark Hanus
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472 -0604
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Sarah Smith
Date: 7/17/2014
Re: July 22, 2014 City Council Consent Agenda Item — Public Gathering Permit
Overview. Full Throttle Fishing has submitted a Public Gathering Permit application to hold a fishing
tournament at Centerview Park on Saturday, August 9, 2014 from sunrise to 4:30 p.m. They are also
requesting approval to hold the event at Surfside Park, as an alternate site, if Centerview Park is not
usable due to high water and park conditions.
Comments.
• The City Council has granted Public Gathering Permit approval for this event for a number of
years.
• The applicant has paid the application fee and damage deposit.
• Expected attendance is 75 persons.
• The applicant has indicated that they have applied for the permits required by the Hennepin
County Sheriff and Water Patrol and have been issued a permit from the DNR.
RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends approval of the requested permit subject to the following
conditions:
1. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of all required public
agency permits.
2. Applicant shall be responsible for contacting the Lake Minnetonka Conservation
District (LMCD) prior to the event regarding the wake restriction on Lake
Minnetonka due to high water conditions.
Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining a temporary sign permit from the City
for the placement of event signage and banners which shall be subject to the
regulations contained in Mound City Code Chapter 119.
-1465-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT
Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals.
Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability
of the police in maintaining order.
NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS.
Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit ��toinsure cleaning up of the park area.
PERMIT FEE: $300/D TO 6 0/DAY* t/ ilk.
DAMAGE DEPOSIT $50 O $1000 /DAY* 7 i 1
*Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff
upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements.
Date(s) of Use %�c 1 2-0 1
/y Viu ✓
Area to be Used _ l F,'t -4 � f og u� —T — /Sari �_ 45 �qs {
Time Frame
Intended Use
70
Expected Attendance TS titer o, S
Organization
FA
Representative's Namea �a JG�vi't 2
C/
Address � 6HfT g r" ' kJa Ct P✓i..2C
Telephone No. Home: 7 6 ?- q91 -' jr08
Drivers License Number
Fire Dept.,
-1466-
7�—
nA
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PLANNING CASE NO.
SUBJECT:
APPLICANTS:
LOCATION:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ZONING:
BACKGROUND
Planning Commission
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant
July 16, 2014
14 -13
Variance — house addition /remodel project
Jason and Christine Baker
1784 Jones Lanes (PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -22 -0036)
Low Density Residential
R -1 Single Family Residential
The applicants, Jason and Christine Baker, are requesting variance approval for a house
addition /remodel project at 1784 Jones Lane. Variance approval is requested to allow a front
setback of 27.54 feet. The City Code requires a 30 -foot front setback for a principal structure.
SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION
The 12,402 square foot property is located on the south side of Jones Lane and has frontage on
Lake Minnetonka. The property currently includes an existing split entry, single - family home
that was constructed in 1975. The requested variance is for a 13' x 23' addition to the front
(north) of the existing home and 6' x 24' expansion to the attached garage. The proposed
additions will match the elevations of the existing home. The applicants are proposing interior
remodeling as part of the project including renovation of the existing master
bedroom /closet /bath. They are also undertaking exterior fagade improvements. Details about
the project are contained in Planning Report No. 14 -13 and the applicants' submitted
application and supporting materials.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their July 15, 2014 meeting and voted six in
favor and one (1) opposed, to recommend Council approval of the requested variance, as
recommended Staff, subject to conditions. Details of the Planning Commission's review are
included in the draft July 15, 2014 Planning Commission meeting minute excerpts which have
been included as an attachment. As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended
approval of the request, Staff prepared the attached resolution for City Council consideration.
-1467-
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR 1784
PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -13
PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -22 -0036
WHEREAS, the applicants, Jason and Christine Baker, are requesting variance approval
for a house addition and remodel project at 1784 Jones Lane; and
WHEREAS, the 12,402 square foot property is located on the south side of Jones Lane
and has frontage on Lake Minnetonka. The property currently includes an existing split
entry, single - family home that was constructed in 1975. The requested variance is for a
13' x 23' addition to the front (north) of the existing home and 6'x 24' expansion to the
attached garage. The proposed additions will match the elevations of the existing
home. The applicants are proposing interior remodeling as part of the project including
renovation of the existing master bedroom /closet/bath. They are also undertaking
exterior fagade improvements; and
WHEREAS, details about the project are contained in Planning Report No. 14 -13 and
the applicants' submitted application and supporting materials; and
WHEREAS, the property is zoned R -1 single - family residential. Section 129 -100 of the
City Code contains the regulations for the R -1 district; and
WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances
which is provided below:
(a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not
mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes
practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use
variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the
following circumstances exist:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined
in City Code Sub. 129 -2.
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special
privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or
buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the
same zone.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the
practical difficulty.
(4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance
are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
and
WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as
follows:
Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that
(i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the zoning ordinance;
(ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property
including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not
created by the landowner; and
(iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical
difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for
solar energy systems.
; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, the variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a meeting held
on July 15, 2014; and
WHEREAS, a majority of the Planning Commission voted to recommend Council
approval of the variance, as recommended by Staff; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its July 22, 2014 meeting
and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable
manner; and
WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of
fact:
1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met.
2. The lot is irregular shaped and includes an angled front lot line.
3. The applicant has minimized the variance as a large majority of the project meets
the minimum 30 -foot setback requirement with only a small portion, about 50
square feet, needing variance approval.
4. The variance is requested due to circumstances unique to the property and not
due to the actions of the applicant who purchased the property in 1999.
5. The placement of the house and the applicable setbacks that apply to the subject
property affects where additions can take place. The applicants have proposed
-1469-
the additions in the area of the property that can accommodate the addition and
that is practical based on the current layout of their home.
6. Including the proposed new additions, the house will be located approximately 40
feet from the curb line abutting the south side of Jones Lane.
Improvements to update a single - family home, constructed in 1975, is
reasonable and will not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the
neighborhood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does
hereby approve the variance with the following conditions:
1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land
use request.
2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included
as part of this action in the event the variance is approved.
3. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building
permit application.
4. Applicant shall ensure that runoff from the roof does not drain on to neighboring
properties.
5. The eaves will be modified in impacted areas to meet the regulation that allows
eaves to extend into setback areas no more than 2 feet.
6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public
agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required
information prior to building permit issuance.
7. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin
County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for
recording until all conditions have been met.
8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at
Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with
the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the
fees to be taken out of the escrow.
9. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)
rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect.
These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority
and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council
on August 23, 2011. Applicant will be required to contact the MCWD related to
the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the
proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver
must be provided before release of any future building permit.
-1470-
10. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection
Elevation (RFPE) or 3 feet above a wetland. The RPFE for Lake Minnetonka is
933.0.
11. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT Lakeshore setback or 100 -year
floodplain areas.
The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property:
(to be inserted)
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of July, 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Mark Hanus, Mayor
-1471-
MINUTE EXCERPTS
2014 JULY 15,
Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry
(7:02), Kelvin Retterath (7:03), Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: David
Goode. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Secretary Jill
Norlander.
BOARD OF APPEALS
Planning Case No. 14 -13 Variance
Property -1784 Jones Lane Applicant —Jason and Christine Baker
Smith introduced the variance request for a house addition /remodel project. Variance
approval is requested to allow a front setback of 27.54 feet instead of the required 30 feet.
The 12,402 square foot Oopert`jz is ocated on tgiheDut side of Jon s Lane and has frontage on
Lake Minnetonka. The rquestd v riarr�e is fora ' ' x3' addition #o the front (north) of the
existing home and a 6 X,'4,%, expansion to laeJattach garage.
Staff is recommending approval of the request with 11 conditions and 7 findings of fact.
Wegscheid agrees with staff assessment all the way through.
Retterath asked about the inside wall.
Jason Baker, 1784 Jones Lane, said that there was reportedly a fire that occurred before they
owned the property. The wall is about 17 to 18 feet from the door and delineates a storage
room /workshop area. It makes the front of the garage about 24 wide by 18.5 deep.
Retterath asked about the reason for 6 foot garage expansion. Why not build it conforming?
Baker said that they put in a dormer above the garage for aesthetics for the neighbors and they
are changing the pitch of garage to match house. The resulting 3/12 pitch would cause
problems with snow.
Retterath stated that, if garage wall and dormer was set behind the 30' line, the pitches could
remain the same. The eaves would be a little higher and the dormer would be 6 inches higher
He is struggling with the garage when it could be tucked behind the setback line.
-1472-
Discussion
Retterath — look at floor plan of house addition, the angle of the lot is working against us. The
interior layout of stairs, everything is snuggled in just right. It's the growth of the garage that
bothers him. Why have setbacks if we don't enforce them. It's all reasonable but just because
it's reasonable doesn't mean it should be allowed. Irregularity of the lot has nothing to do with
the garage size issue.
MOTION by Bergquist, second by Gawtry, to recommend approval of the variance as
recommended by Staff subject to conditions 1 -11 and findings of fact 1 -7. MOTION carried.
Voting for: Penner, Bergquist, Gawtry, Smieja, Stone and Wegscheid Voting against: Retterath
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION by Penner, second by Gawtry, to adjourn at 7:22 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously.
Submitted by Jill Norlander
-1473-
nAiL
TY. M N _.......
PLANNING REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
PLANNING CASE NO.
SUBJECT:
APPLICANTS:
LOCATION:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
ZONING:
Planning Commission
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant
July 11, 2014 (revised July 17, 2014 to correct typos)
14 -13
Variance — house addition /remodel project
Jason and Christine Baker
1784 Jones Lanes (PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -22 -0036)
Low Density Residential
R -1 Single Family Residential
_� ;
BACKGROUND
The applicants, Jason and Christine Baker, are requesting variance approval for a house
addition /remodel project at 1784 Jones Lane. Variance approval is requested to allow a front
setback of 27.54 feet.
SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION
The 12,402 square foot property is located on the south side of Jones Lane and has frontage on
Lake Minnetonka. The property currently includes an existing split entry, single - family home
that was constructed in 1975. The requested variance is for a 13' x 23' addition to the front
(north) of the existing home and 6' x 24' expansion to the attached garage. The proposed
additions will match the elevations of the existing home. The applicants are proposing interior
remodeling as part of the project including renovation of the existing master
bedroom /closet /bath. They are also undertaking exterior facade improvements. Applicants
have indicated that a separate permit application for exterior remodeling /siding may be
submitted. Specific details about the project are contained in the applicants' submitted
application and supporting materials.
REVIEW PROCEDURE
City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a
landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property
owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City
Code Sub. 129 -2.
-1474-
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special
privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or
buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the
same zone.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical
difficulty.
(4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are
consistent with the comprehensive plan.
According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, 'Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows:
Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that:
(i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not
permitted by the zoning ordinance;
(ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including
unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the
landowner; and
(iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical
difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for
solar energy systems.
60 -DAY PROCESS
The variance application was submitted on July 1, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes
Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request
unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes
645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the
60 -day rule and was determined to be July 2, 2014.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
All property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a
copy of the Planning Commission agenda on July 11, 2014 to inform them of the variance
request. Members are advised that the applicants discussed the project with the abutting
neighbors on the east and west sides. Both neighbors contacted Staff to inform the City that
they were in favor of the project. A copy of the information received from the abutting
neighbors has been included as attachments to the Planning Report.
-1475-
STAFF /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVIEW
Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved departments,
consultants and agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized
below.
Kandis Hanson, City Manager
Melissa Manderschied, City Attorney
Ray Hanson,
Public Works Superintendent
Scott Qualle,
MnSpect Building Official
Joey Handtmann,
MCWD District Representative
Responded that she has no comments.
The applicants' narrative said the cul -de -sac was
vacated and the street was converted to a through
street in 1975. Please confirm if information is
accurate. Hennepin County property information
site indicates the most recent purchase was in
1999. If information in applicants' narrative is
correct, then practical difficulties test seems to be
met. Additional Notes: The street vacation took
place in 1975. Staff confirmed that the applicants'
purchased the property in 1999.
Agree with comments from City Attorney.
Responded that he has no issues.
After reviewing the plans for 1784 Jones Lane,
it would appear no MCWD rules would be
triggered unless over 50 cubic yards of soil
were to be excavated /used as fill. If that was
the case, then an erosion control permit would be
required.
DISCUSSION
L. The regulations for the R -1 zoning district are contained in Sec. 129 -100. The setback
requirements that apply to the subject lot, which is a lot of record, are summarized as
follows:
Front: 30 feet
Side: 10 feet /6 feet
Rear: 50 feet from 929.4 ordinary high water mark for Lake Minnetonka
2. The shape of the lot was modified following the vacation of a portion of the cul de sac
in 1975 which added property to the subject lot in the NW corner.
-1476-
3. The lot is irregularly shaped as it has an angled front property line along Jones Lane.
4. As can be seen on the submitted survey, the majority of the project meets the 30 -foot
minimum setback requirement. Information from the applicant estimates that the
amount of the project that requires variance approval is approximately 50 SF (40 feet
for the attached garage addition portion and 10 square feet for the house addition
portion.)
Information on the application requests a variance of 2.46 feet from the required 30-
foot requirement to allow a 27.54 foot front setback for the proposed house addition
project. This dimension is located at the NE corner of the "house portion" of the
addition and stated on the survey along with an arrow depicting same.
6. As can be seen on the survey, there is about 10 feet of right -of -way between the
property line and the constructed road. With the proposed additions, the house will be
located approximately 40 feet from the curb line abutting Jones Lane.
The applicant has indicated that the hardcover amount shown on the application
was based on the 30 percent allowance and was under the regulations. The application
also shows the lot size at 12,750 SF while the information on the survey states that the
lot, as measured to the 929.4 ordinary high water mark is 12,702 SF. Members are
advised that the subject property is a lot of record and therefore eligible for 40
percent hardcover allowance subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129- 385(g)(2).
Hardcover has not been field verified. However, Staff is confident the subject lot,
with the proposed additions, is consistent with the applicable hardcover provisions.
8. The submitted plans show three foot (3) foot eaves on portions of the project so as to
match the existing house. Code allows eaves to extend up to two (2) feet into setback
areas. Applicant has advised that the eaves will be modified in impacted areas so as to
meet the code.
9. While the existing garage portion of the building has approximately 35 feet of depth,
applicant has indicated that the actual space for vehicle parking is approximately
18 -19 feet as there is a wall separating this area that was not shown on the submitted
plans.
10. It is anticipated that the applicants will provide additional information regarding the
existing layout of the house and how the proposed additions have been programmed to
update the house.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
-1477-
In accordance with City Code Sec. 129 -39 (a), Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the requested variance subject to the following conditions:
1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use
request.
2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as
part of this action in the event the variance is approved.
3. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit
application.
4. Applicant shall ensure that runoff from the roof does not drain on to neighboring
properties.
5. The eaves will be modified in impacted areas to meet the regulation that allows eaves
to extend into setback areas no more than 2 feet.
6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency
permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to
building permit issuance.
7. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County.
The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all
conditions have been met.
8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at
Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the
City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be
taken out of the escrow.
9. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules
related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are
now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was
officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011.
Applicant will be required to contact the MCWD related to th a new regulations and
applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence
from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of
any future building permit.
10. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection
Elevation (RFPE) or 3 feet above a wetland. The RPFE for Lake Minnetonka is 933.0.
-1478-
11. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT Lakeshore setback or 100 -year floodplain
areas.
In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered.
1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met.
2. The lot is irregular shaped and includes an angled front lot line.
3. The applicant has minimized the variance as a large majority of the project meets the
minimum 30 -foot setback requirement with only a small portion, about 50 square feet,
needing variance approval.
4. The variance is requested due to circumstances unique to the property and not due to
the actions of the applicant who purchased the property in 1999.
The placement of the house and the applicable setbacks that apply to the subject
property affects where additions can take place. The applicants have proposed the
additions in the area of the property that can accommodate the addition and that is
practical based on the current layout of their home.
6. Including the proposed new additions, the house will be located approximately 40 feet
from the curb line abutting the south side of Jones Lane.
7. Improvements to update a single - family home, constructed in 1975, is reasonable and
will not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood.
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded
to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, possible meeting date is
Tuesday, July 22, 2014. Alternate date is Tuesday, August 12, 2014.
-1479-
1,�
0
2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364
Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX 952472 -0620
RECT JUL 01 2614
Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required It time of application. r
Planning Commission Date I- Case No.
City Council Date -4' P655'I 1 (� -22 c>' b'I Z
Please type or print legibly
SUBJECT Address 1784 Jones Lane Mound MN 55364
PROPERTY
LEGAL
Lot 004
DESI
Block 002
Replat Harrison Shores
PID # 13- 117 -24 -22 -0036 2onin : Rt to R2 R3 B1 62 83 (Circle one)
Name Jason & Christine Baker
1784 Jones Lane Mound MN 55364
Email jbaker @jbaker.org
Phone Home 952- 472 -2621 Work 612- 605 -8825
APPLICANT I Name Email
(IF OTHER
THAN Address
OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedu
for this property? Yes ( ) No (X), if yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s)
and provide copies of resolutions.
2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
Proposed 13'x23' addition to existing home and 6'x24' addition to existing garage. Additions match existing
elevations of the home and garage. Interior remodeling of the existing master bedroom, closet and bath are all
conforming. (See Attached narrative).
Variance Information
(1012112013) Page 4 of 6 -1480-
Case No.
3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning
district in which it is located? Yes (X) No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason
for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.):
SETBACKS:
Front Yard:
SEW)
Side Yard:
(N )
Side Yard:
( N S
Rear Yard:
( N& W )
Lakeside:
( N@E W )
:(NSEW)
Street Frontage:
Lot Size:
Hardcover.
REQUIRED
30 ft
10 ft
6 ft.
50 ft
50 ft
ft.
ft.
12750 sq ft
3825 sq ft
REQUESTED VARIANCE
(or e)dsting)
27.54 fL
11 ft
6 ft.
47.5 ft.
47.5 ft,
ft.
ft.
sq ft
3345 sq ft
2.46 ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
sq ft
sq ft
4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is
located? Yes (X), No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use:
5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the
uses permitted in that zoning district?
( ) too narrow
( ) topography
( ) soil
( ) too small
( ) drainage
( ) existing situation
(X) too shallow
( ) shape
( ) other: specify
Please describe: Irregular shaped lot
Variance Information
(10/21/2013) Page 5 of 6 -1481-
Case No. /� -15
6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in
the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No N. If yes, explain:
7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes ( ), No (X). If yes, explain:
Prope! configuration of the lot was effected by the vacated cul de sac.
8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property
described in
this petition? Yes (X), No ( }. If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
9. Comments: See Attached Narrative
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information
provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized
official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be required by___,�P�
Owner's
Date
Applicant's Signature Date
Variance Inforrnation
(1 012 112 0 1 3) Page 6 of 6 -1482-
Owner:
Owner Narrative for Variance Application
Jason & Christine Baker
Property Address:
1784 Jones Lane
Mound, MN 55364
RECD J U L 0 1 20' 4.
The proposed variance is for an addition to an existing split entry home built in 1974. We are looking to
add a 2 story 13'x23' addition to the street side of the home as well as a 6' addition to the front of the
garage. Both would match the elevations of the existing home and enhance the curb appeal of the
home.
The Variance is being requested due the irregular property line not following the street (Jones Lane).
Jones Lane used to be a cul -de -sac and was converted to a through street joining with Lafayette Lane in
1975. The property marker on the North West corner (adjacent to 1776 Jones Lane) is set 12' back from
the street while the property marker on the NE corner (adjacent to 1794 Jones lane) is set back 10' from
the street. If both property markers were 10' from the street, no variance would be needed. Regardless
of the markers, no portions of the house or garage will be less than 40' from the street.
The master bedroom, closet and bathroom will also be remodeled at the same time as the addition, but
all interior remodeling with conform to all building codes.
Thank you.
Jason Baker
-1483-
Supplemental Information from Applicant -- Sec. 124 -34 (a) Regarding
Variance Criteria and practical Difficulty
City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance maybe granted to provide relief to a
landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the
property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined
in City Code Sub. 129 -2. The request for the variance is due to the unusual lot
shape due to the shape of the original vacated road and the curvature of the
land and granting the variance will not alter the character of the locality.
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands,
structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to
property within the same zone. The layout of this house on the lot is unique
due to the fact that the house was built on the cul-de -sac Jones Lane, but now
is a transition lot between Jones Lane and Lafayette Lane. The cul -de -sac circle
was vacated when Lafayette Lane was installed and now this House has a 60
foot front yard set -back on the west side.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the
practical difficulty. The proposed variance is the minimum needed to create a
usable space that is esthetically pleasing to surrounding properties.
(4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance
are consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed addition will make
the house a better transition between the homes on Jones Cane and Lafayette
Lane.
According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, 'Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows:
Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that:
(i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable
manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance;
(ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the
property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other
circumstances not created by the landowner; and
(iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character o
the locality.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.
Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to
direct sunlight for solar energy systems.
MM
Hello Sarah,
We have reviewed the blueprints for the planned construction at 1784 Jones Lane, and are in
favor of proceeding.
/Mark Carlson & Dorenda Carlson
1776 Jones Lane
Mound, MN 55364
-1485-
Ms. Smith -- I understand that our next door neighbors, Jason and Christine Baker, are seeking a variance for an
addition and remodeling to their home. We have seen their proposed plans and have no objection to the
variance.
Mike and Kay Riley
1794 Jones Lane
Mound, MN 55364
-1486-
1
LAFAYETTE
LADE
Nor lheost
of Lo+
o 1 \
corner
2
6�
J®NE5
L
ZZ
s
O.
I- ��lE.
Norll�eesf eor.
of Loo 4
0
Cox o:
Description of Jones Lane to be vacated.
That part of Jones Lane as platted in REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES,
according to the recorded plat thereof, lying southerly of the
following described line: Beginning at the angle point in the
northerly line of Lot 4, Block 2 in said addition, said point being
23.18 feet westerly.of the northeast corner of said Lot 4; thence
westerly to the northeast corner of Lot 2, Block 3, DRIFTWOOD SHORES,
according to the recorded plat thereof, and there terminating.
September 10, 1975
1"-30'
6 WCOfNBS- KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, IN14 7-
CONSULTING (WhIIFS C IANO SURV['D l C SITE FlAANIRS ntE NO.
- _•�+,; ,, Mi NNEAPOLIS. HUI CHINSON end MARSHALL, MINN(SOTA 2672
Prepared for:
CHARLES Fe OLSON
7. I q I_ v
EXISTING CONDITION SURVEY / s
W/ PROPOSED ADDITION FOR.
J'ASON
BAKER
932.3 932.5
SAN M H. 0
Legend
TOP-932
27--,,,,v..o
RE JUN -30 2014
C SS3
9
-CT
0 Sanitary Manhole
A
0 Power Pole
0 Deciduous Tree
933.3, 10, !133.
Concrete Curb
933.4.
A .1
91
Timber Border /Retaining Well
Retaining
9� a.\/
-9J4
34.0
#1776
FIRST FLOOR=935.3
FLOOR=933.9
Keystone Wall
IZ
GARAGE
X900.0 Existing Elevation
x900.OTC Top of Curb Elevation
934
34.4 ✓
X9 'N A
<\
x
x900.OTW Top of Wall Elevation
A-34. 6X
934.5
935 + 3..4.6
.82—
is
--900— Existing Contour
'--OHW 929.4-- Ordinary High Water Contour
934.6, 934.3,
0" MAPL x934: OF Sb'10
FVtO141 50BACK 35.
33.8
* Denotes Iron Monument Found
* Denotes Set, 1/2" x 14"
Iron Pipe w/ Plastic Cap
Inscribed R.L.S. 15230.
x .
936 01"
3—
28• 4 L 10i *
&VIP *11,
111.
L
935
9352__-- _`-3%7 — -r_
36.2
— -- — X
Ck
C?)
C5 Cb . 34.1
934.0
9337 Ck .932.6
93r.7
934.6, 934-
#1794
FIRST FLOOR=936.8 = �, // f / //� p s\ \
GARAGE FLOOR=935.6
0 00
0
Z Iq FIRE PIT
00.
61,
931
933.8x g ax 932.4, T 9 931,1
Si;!i
_,934.2 25
24- ASH -031.8
.8X /, / /
952
L
CS 48* OAK
dl\
931.
V) 931.8 '8X
<
931.4
9317,
931 �2 C;' ri
IS"
2 p
Ar H
b,
EDGE OF WATE
C7
SIP.
104-14 133/68
SCALE: 1 INCH = 10 FEET
LOT AREA ABOVE ORDINARY HIGH WATER (OHW 929.4) = 12,402± SF
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block 2, REPLAT OF HARRISON SHORES,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
BENCHMARK: T N.H. at 1797 Loyfayette Ln Elevation = 936.92.
NOTE: No Search Was Mode For Any Easements
NOTE: The location of all utilities shown ore from observed evidence
in the field and from plans furnished by the utility companies
and ore approximate. Utility companies should be notified for
exact location before doing any excavation.
I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by
me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC.
Woodrow A. Brown, R.L.S. MN REG 15230
Datec: 06-27-2014
V. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC_
8030 Cedar Avenue So., Suite 228.
Bloomington, MN -55425
Bus- (952) 854-4055
Fox: (952) 854-4268
34'±
•
w
La
x
5.7 7
M EAS.
-4
•
•
•
IQ no A
C) 1
La 'tp
lro
W 1
fo
L04
ca 0
40A.
'oe
LA
..........
Ar%
cx
jr
La 'tp
lro
CA
40A.
'oe
0
C.7
AL
00;v
>
SA
M -4
>
rn
0
0 M
C)
7-
off
If (A
(0
0
C004
L4
m -1489-1-
1
EXISTING
BATH
V-6 x 13'- (
EXISTING
BEDROOM 02
x (0
CEXISTING
FAMILY ROOM
Pa, x
0 Lr_
EXISTING r
GARAGE EXISTING
2X-0 x 215'-4 HALL
11' x 3'
UP
EXISTING
0 r— 7 BEDROOM 03
liv,4 x
EXISTING L
ENTRY/MECH.
EXIST$OG
OYE)R
=T ---------- JL� g
L I LINE OF
LINE OF r-ANTLEYEE A1_5_0Y!9_ IJ . . . . . . . . . . . Tq�io_� DASHED)
– — — — — — i_f_;I;0_UK C)ASWEV)
WALL LEGEND
— — — — — - L J EXISTING WALLS
EXISTIW_% WALLS, CADINETS, EM
TO SE REMOVED
1_. OW LEVEL FLAN EX16TING/lDF-10LITI ON
Al 1/,4- = 1�_Cii
RECT% J U L 0 1 - 2011
LOWEfR LEVEL FL 4N - FFROF05ED
1/4 R = 1' -0a
LINE qF CANTILEVER 4_P!aYL — — —
LUALL LEGEND
EXISTING WALLS
NEW 2xA ux,)00 FRAMED WALLS
ig
M
0
Jill 111
HCH
DESIGN COMPANY
P: 952.250,4215
5421 EASTVIEWAVENUE
MINNETRISTA, IVIN 55364
IMPORTANT NOTE FOR
CONTRACTORS &
SUB-CONTRACTORS
1. These, drawings are Design
Drawings. The General Contractor
has the right and responsibility to
revise configurations and details
depicted in the Designer's
Design Drawings, as required,
to properly construct a technically
sound project.
2. The General Contractor to notify
the Designer when deviating
from the Design Intent.
3, The General Contractor Is
responsible for verifying all
covenants, zoning, building
fire, heating, plumbing and
electrical code requirements.
db
•
LOWEfR LEVEL FL 4N - FFROF05ED
1/4 R = 1' -0a
LINE qF CANTILEVER 4_P!aYL — — —
LUALL LEGEND
EXISTING WALLS
NEW 2xA ux,)00 FRAMED WALLS
ig
M
0
Jill 111
HCH
DESIGN COMPANY
P: 952.250,4215
5421 EASTVIEWAVENUE
MINNETRISTA, IVIN 55364
IMPORTANT NOTE FOR
CONTRACTORS &
SUB-CONTRACTORS
1. These, drawings are Design
Drawings. The General Contractor
has the right and responsibility to
revise configurations and details
depicted in the Designer's
Design Drawings, as required,
to properly construct a technically
sound project.
2. The General Contractor to notify
the Designer when deviating
from the Design Intent.
3, The General Contractor Is
responsible for verifying all
covenants, zoning, building
fire, heating, plumbing and
electrical code requirements.
db
•
E =_ - -E
EkiSTING i1 G
ExI5TIW
BATH 11 r L IVING ROOM
vAULTED
x 22, x ll*-S
i1 1
EXISTING C� t
MASTER BEDROOM _1
01 --n -
DENOTES EXISTING DOORS -----------
TO BE RE- LOCATED TO
REMODELED AREAS - — J 011 n
(MATCH NUMBERS FROM DEMO I
EXISTING PLAN TO PROPOSED PLAN
GARAGE FOR NEW LOCATIONS) EXISTIWs
23'-0 x 2g' -4 HALL
I' x 3'
6 CD> 0 UL, IN
EXISTING
110/ 1 DINING ROOM
LL f I x 14,-1,
EXISTING EXISTING EXISTIW_2
CLOSET STUD" 00 <ITCHEN
r_-- _..__— ..-- ___...— .— _._ --- — I' x V 01.3 xv EXIST14G &.5 x W,
C4 'Ir-OYE)R 0 01__
11 V-4 x 4. \
J 101. 11 1
Er:---j
x S,
WALL LEGEND
ILL EXISTIN63 WALLS
EXISTING WALLS, CABINETS, ETC.
LEVEL FLAN EX16TING/DEr-IOLITION TO BE REMOVED
A2 1/4' 1i_®"
LEQ- L EO
IAUN4%231
V_
EXPANDED
GARAGE
23'-8 x 35'-4
F----------
160. 10OVERHEAD DOOR - - - - - - - - - -
REMODELED
MASTER BEDROOM
12' x 13,-6
(D
V-0"
CLEAR
W
d)
NEW
o HALL"-, ° W4
3' x 5,-fp _j
EXPANDED
CLOSET
x 121-rp
x
W
REMODELE
54TH W
V-6 x V-8
H
at WALK-
<
LLI LIJ
_j
U
REMODELED
WALK -
4
mu'li
HALL
12' x .3'
W
F,O E R
(2) S 1/2' LVL FLUSH
LEDGE
AL
INE OF EXISTING,
HOUSE WALLS
CASHED)
EWS, ROOF TRUSSES
24' aC_
NEW
STUDY
15'-a x 8,
EXISTING
L IVING ROOM
VAULTED
22' x II' -s
-----------
11 II
II 11
>OQUIN
EXISTING
I DINING ROOM
cr-6 x
O EXISTING
II
0 KITCHEN
v-S x W,
001 ....................
......... .
rTFI)
(2) 9 1 L FLUSH
9
EXPANDED
FO`rER
6' -4 x 12'-6
DOUN
01
(2) 2.10A-S
TRANSOM WOW_ 1
,x NEW 1-
PORTICO
ic) 9
V-9 x 1,
2x 10's
ENG. OOF TR,
ITOR42.60 2W �02-4* O.G.
x
8'-3"
N v.
WALL)
(CENTER ON tl&'-&* WALL)
35,-10, ---
WALL LEGEND
EXISTING WALLS
6*-8"
NEW 2x4 u)OOD FRAMED WALLS
t 2,T-2"
'0 (VERIFY uil ExI5,*4)
LEVEL FL 4N FfROF=05ED
2
A2 111/ 114" = 1,-0-
M
P: 952,250.4215
5421 EASTVIEW AVENUE
MINNETRISTA, MN 55364
IMPORTANT NOTE FOR
CONTRACTORS &
SUB-CONTRACTORS
Drawings. The General Contractor
has the right and responsibility to
revise configurations and details
depicted in the Designer's
Design Drawings, as required.
to properly construct a technically
sound project. General Contractor
'd e era' Co responsibility to
respons' ii'
configurations and details
D' ",
-'gne
Drawings, "' required. . technically
2, The General Contractor to notify
the Designer when deviating
from the Design Intent
a .
3. The General Contractor is
responsible for verifying all
covenants, zoning, building
fire, heating, plumbing and
r
electrical code requirements.
•
40
Z
•
•
000
10, S=AIQE COLUMNS wl
W OVER Ix8 HEAD TRIM 4
lx2 OVER Ix I0 BASE TRIM
NO H ELEVATION - FFROF06ED
I/A' -- I' -O"
Lu
_j I
WEST ELEVATION - FFROFOSED
SHED DORMER 4 EXISTING GARAGE OVER FRAMING:
2x6 RAFTERS 0 24* O.C.
(INSTALL 2x4 VERTICAL MEMBERS
TO DISTRIBUTE ROOF LOAD TO
EXISTING ROOF TRU55E5
SECTION
A
A3 1/4' = 1i —O"
ASPHALT SWINGI
TYPICAL GABLE
IxA FRIEZE SOAP
IX(p,g VERTICAL,
PANEL, (1 1/2' SF
ON 2x- TAPIEREI
lx(p APRON
ix4 FRIEZE WAP
MATCH EXISTING
SOFFIT 4 FASCIA
lx& CORNER 50
WINDOW TRIM
HORIZONTAL LAI
w/ &* EXPOSURE
EAST ELEVATION
1/4' = I' —O"
MATCH 12
EXIST-
LINE OF PORTICO
ROOF BEYOND
W
:x
W
t Y-a' O.N.
O.N. (MATCH
(MATCH EXIST-)
EXIST.)
STUDY co
NEW
PORTICO
ALI— D :I w x
cis fe z,. W
Wx rn
>W se X9
t Out
I—
MUNEW
P/1-AUNDFRY
Z
r --� SECTION
4
A3 1/4' = P—O"
TYPICAL ROOF CONSTRUCTION
ROOFING (SEE EXTERIORS)
15• FELT
1/2- 0513- --SHEATHING
ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSSES 0 24' OC.
R-44 BAD. INSULATION
6 MIL poLy VAPOR BARRIER
5/8* GYP. BD_
TYPICAL 5OFFIT CONSTRUCTION.
MATCH EXISTING SOFFIT ® FASCIA
T'l-FICAL E XT ERIOR_ WALL CONSTRUCTION
SIDING (SEE EXTERIORS)
BUILDING WRAP
1/2' ObjB, SHEATHING
2*4 STUDS 9 16' OjC-
Rlcj INSULATION
A MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER
112* GYP. 50.
TYPICAL FLOOR CONSTRUCTION
314* T4G PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR (GLUED 4 NAILED)
s 112- I-JOISTS ® Wp* Or-
fALIGN ALL NEW FLOORS W/ EXISTING)
TYPICAL FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTION
12- CONC. BLOCK ON 2®' x a* CONC. FOOTING
31/2- CONC. FLOOR SLAB
ON 6- GRANULAR FILL
HCH
DESIGN COMPANY
P: 952.250.4215
5421 EASTVIEW AVENUE
MINNETRISTA, MN 55364
IMPORTANT NOTE FOR
CONTRACTORS &
SUB-CONTRACTORS
1. These drawings are Design
Drawings, The General Contractor
has the right and responsibility to
revise configurations and details
depicted in the Designer's
Design Drawings, as required,
to properly construct a technically
sound project.
2. The General Contractor to notify
the Designer when deviating
from the Design intent, I
3. The General Contractor is
responsible for verifying all
covenants, zoning, building
fire, heating, plumbing and
electrical code requirement
31
•
•
it
NORTH ELEVATION - EX15TING
1/4" = 1' -®"
UJEST ELEV4TION EX16TING
F=A,5T F:LFEVAT ION F=XI&TING
A' C�'
-VA--4,) 1/4" = 1'-@.
(VERIFY w/ EXISTfWj�
FiCH
DESGN COMPANY
P: 952.250.4215
5421 EASTVIEW AVENUE
MINNETRISTA, MN 55364
IMPORTANT NOTE FOR
CONTRACTORS &
SUB-CONTRACTORS
1, These drawings are Design
Drawings. The General Contractor
has the right and responsibility to
revise configurations and details
depicted in the Designer's
Design Drawings, as required,
to properly construct a technically
sound project.
drawings
n
y
right
the h
The
nDrawings,
n
construct
d
D
General
0
r
r
n
a
u
e
Designer's n
0
D
e
q
responsibility
r
required,
e
project. a
gs
0 s'
es
configurations
`sea
a
r
0
details
c
i
b
Contractor
technically
Design
d
n
1 The General Contractor to notify
Contractor actor
y "'
ai's
Ically
notify
the Designer when deviating
from the Design intent.
er
3, The General Contractor is
responsible for verifying all
covenants, zoning, building
fire, heating, plumbing and
.1 . r q.1rem ts.
electrical code requirements.
code
•
•
•
•
EXISTING
UNEXCAVATED
M
EXISTING ca4c. BLOCK WALL
TO 13E REMOVED FOR CRAWLSP ACE ACCESS
EXISVwx roNr-- MOCK WALL
TO BE REMOVED
ALTERNATE 510 TO LEAVE
EXISTiwa GONG. MOCK WALL
* REMODELED MECH. ROOM
(VERIFY w/ 004ER)
- - - - - - - r------- - - - - -- (2) 2X IV4
2x'o
- - - - - - - - - - - -7
1 f1:x
3-1-0
d) 3'-0"-
IL
2x4 BEARING WALL ON IX WI �
BLOCK CH 7 10
777 1
A' CURB )-I _j
20' X a' CONC, FOOTiW-2 0 . Q 6
NEW
LOWER LEVEL Z11"
NEW
CRNEW
Ji UJL5f=
A 9
UNEXCAVATED
1 f2- CONC. 15LOCK FOUND-
N_ iV CONC-
WALL 0N 20'
o (TYPICAL)
FOOTIWQ (TYPIcAL)
FOOTING
L-
—
i I
CoNr- IBLOCK FOUND. WALL
NEW 9
g, r-URe. (OMIT a DOORS)
ON 20' x 0' CONC. FOOTING
L F,
L UNEX•
L
(VERIFY w/ EXISTfWj�
FiCH
DESGN COMPANY
P: 952.250.4215
5421 EASTVIEW AVENUE
MINNETRISTA, MN 55364
IMPORTANT NOTE FOR
CONTRACTORS &
SUB-CONTRACTORS
1, These drawings are Design
Drawings. The General Contractor
has the right and responsibility to
revise configurations and details
depicted in the Designer's
Design Drawings, as required,
to properly construct a technically
sound project.
drawings
n
y
right
the h
The
nDrawings,
n
construct
d
D
General
0
r
r
n
a
u
e
Designer's n
0
D
e
q
responsibility
r
required,
e
project. a
gs
0 s'
es
configurations
`sea
a
r
0
details
c
i
b
Contractor
technically
Design
d
n
1 The General Contractor to notify
Contractor actor
y "'
ai's
Ically
notify
the Designer when deviating
from the Design intent.
er
3, The General Contractor is
responsible for verifying all
covenants, zoning, building
fire, heating, plumbing and
.1 . r q.1rem ts.
electrical code requirements.
code
•
•
•
•
ru t-�j
Consulting Engineers & Surveyors
(U"J 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172
Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805
www,bolton- menk.com
July 17, 2014
Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE: 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project
City Project Nos. PW- 13 -01, PW- 13 -02, PW -13 -05
Pay Request No. 9
Dear Ms. Hanson:
f r,-.1
Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 9 from GMH Asphalt Corporation for work completed on
the 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project from January 6, 2014 through
July 14, 2014.
We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the
amount of $160,661.60 to GMH Asphalt Corporation.
Sincerely,
BOLTON & MENK, INC.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
Mound City Engineer
cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works
Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance
1494-
DATE: 7/14/2014
CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 9 CONTRACTOR GMH
Asphalt Corp.
2013 STREET IMPROVEMENTS OWNER
City of Mound
City Project Nos. PW- 13 -01, PW- 13 -02, PW -13 -05 ENGINEER
Bolton
& Menk
BMI PROJECT NO. 012.105545
FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 1/6/2014 THROUGH 7/14/2014
TOTALAMOUNT BID ... ---- ............................................................._._............._ ...........................__.. _........._..
$
4174,544.41
APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS + EXTRA WORK ...................................................... ...............................
$
290,898,41
CURRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT .......... ..........................._.................................... ...............................
$
4,565,442.82
TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE ..... ....... ... .............. ............................. .......... ............... _ ........ .............. ........
$
4,687,288.52
TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE. .............................. ..................... ........... ......... .......... — ........ - -
- $
-
DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED.......................... ........... .................... . --
$
TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK It STORED MATERIALS..._ ............... ................................... ................. ...................
$
4,687,288.52
RETAINED PERCENTAGE ( 2.5% ) . .................................... .................................. ...............................
$
117,182.21
TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS ......... .............. ............................. ............ -...... ......... ... ,........ ..........
$
-
NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE ........ ....... - ................... .......................... --- ... - ........................
$
4,570,106.31
TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES ................................................................ ...............................
$
4,409,444.71
PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO. 9 .............. ............ .............. ........,..........,_....._....... .............. ..................
$
160,661.60
Certificate for Payment
I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices
of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been
performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project
between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any
authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount
for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been complied with and that
all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured.
Contractor: GMH Asphalt Corporation
9180 Lake Town Road
Chaska, MN 55318
By
Name Title
Date
CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT:
BOLTON & MENK, INC., ENGINEERS, 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318
By rC"i'ta- ..€^�, '�ci ", it- yf*- �"Y'L'�-� , PROJECT ENGINEER
Daniel L. Faulkner
Date
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT:
Owner: CITY OF MOUND
By
Name Title Date
-1495-
/ /f -.'_ Consulting Engineers & Surveyors " l 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172
_' Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805
www.bolton- menk.com
July 17, 2014
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE: 2014 Seal Coat Project
City Project No. PW -14 -07
Award of Contract
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council:
The areas to be seal coated include all of the 2009 Street Reconstruction Project area streets as
well as the Sugar Mill area streets and Bellaire Lane from Grandview Boulevard to Alder Road
(attached Figures 1 -4). The contractor is required to complete this work by August 26, 2014.
This will be followed by the second sweeping which is required to be completed by September 5,
2014.
Quotes were received for the 2014 Seal Coat Project on July 15, 2014. There are basically three
qualified contractors that do nearly all of the seal coating work in the metro area and they were
all contacted to see if they would submit a quote for the Mound project. Two of them responded
that the August completion schedule would work for them but only one of these two submitted a
quote as follows:
1. Allied Blacktop Company $84,320.00
The low quote is less than the engineer's estimate of $95,800.00. Allied Blacktop Company, out
of Maple Grove, MN has successfully completed several seal coat projects throughout Minnesota
including the City of Mound's 2010, 2011 and 2013 Seal Coat projects.
It is our recommendation to award the 2014 Seal Coat Project to Allied Blacktop Company in the
amount of $84,320.00. A resolution is included recommending award of contract in this amount
to Allied Blacktop Company.
Sincerely,
Bolton & Monk, Inc.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P. E.
City Engineer
cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is — en-A opportunity employer
-1496-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
2014 BITUMINOUS SEAL COAT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City has an annual road maintenance program consisting of crack repair and
seal coating that is contracted work both of which are included in the City's Capital Improvement
Program; and
WHEREAS, this type of road maintenance is typically completed initially on streets that are five
to six years old; and
WHEREAS, the 2014 Seal Coat project area includes all of the bituminous streets reconstructed
with the 2009 Street Reconstruction Project as well as the Sugar Mill area streets and Bellaire
Lane from Grandview Boulevard to Alder Road, and
WHEREAS, the Seal Coat Project was estimated to cost less than $100,000, the statutory limit
requiring public advertisement for bids; and
WHEREAS, quotes were solicited and received on July 15, 2014 at the office of Bolton & Menk,
Inc. and tabulated as follows:
Allied Blacktop Company $84,320.00
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to
award the contract for the 2014 Bituminous Seal Coat Improvement Project to Allied Blacktop
Company, out of Maple Grove, MN in the amount of $84,320.00.
Adopted by the City Council this 22`d day of July, 2014.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
Mayor, Mark Hanus
-1497-
o z
0
� o
a w Q
L� U
O
F-
U
o ` O O
z
Q W
s D
W 0
LLJ -J � �f�� � Q Li
iiL4
Q z
1 , i I DO
v Q
wy� omS w
�7 T 4...
J
i 'l
o
�n 8
6 j
mi vi
mia
C 3
M yJ0
c , W N N
ITT nF
Z o
N
0 LL j o
UWW1iii%" L� E j C �
w0
� U
o mD- _j �z
00
m=
O'
19.70
V)
Z
O
Q
U
O
J
Q
U
J
W
O �
Z
W�
CD
0
W N
J
ante 3003153M
-1499-
x
\ L
��
O
O
N Lai
W
coO
O
W
J
Q
U
Q �
N
O
Z
U W
Ir
W
--D u
z ° E
�n
0
o
LLUw
OJT
Q
W
U � �
O o
N N
J
7
U =
Z
�N �
- W
e
W; w�N
O c
C a rc i
z t
m z � a
U
L o d' �
Zw E
a�ov.
O O N a
c w a
N n
L O Z U
Ju ym�<
O Z vo
a m
� o
C U
O Z
7
00
m
0 z
mm
z
z
0
pd
x
N
z
O
a
U
O
a
U
Q
Li
0 �
z
Wo
WN
J
O
O
N W
W
L�
O
O
CD
W
J
Q
U
O N
401.11 OF
nniB �.aUawaap
1 �
i
1500-
n
0
z
0
1�
U
L
z0
D
CO
G Q <
0
U W
Q
�w
cn
O �
0
N
0
O
Z
W
Of
D
U
E
0
N
J
Z
Z¢ a
Jw
J <
Y 3<
n =z�
>U �
uj
a ¢
3f w
m s rn
m zd�
rn z x
ZW
0-
Z -� U
N VI
Z
O z
a �
O'
O
0]
0
0
v w
w
0
z
0 - w
0 U [if
W ::D
zo
W
o <<
0
OLL- U Li
J F-
i Q
LJ
f.� > V)
z� X711
Oe
rill
o......... _
r
n
71 r
ON x3553 r I i� ��
Z ..._ l51 d �, o > i
Y I ,_- _ m O
1
n &7N/ � �c
E
0a �'— , --+:•� a (I.'l'„N,{ �� / /JI I _ °i a3ix�.�'o�.- .. --!i C of
arn�
IJV 1
�`\
a+
'� j: � �
Consulting Engineers &t Surveyors
" � 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 •Chaska, MN 55318 -1172
`- _ Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805
www.bolton- menk.com
July 17, 2014
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE: 3025 Island View Drive Retaining Wall Replacement
Award of Contract
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council:
E.
Following the heavy rain events in early June, staff noticed the timber retaining, extending across
three properties centered at 3025 Island View Drive, had begun to bulge out and appeared to be
in an imminent state of failure. Staff took immediate precautions and closed approximately one-
half of the roadway and continued to monitor the status of the wall while we developed a
replacement wall plan and contacted retaining wall contractors.
It was determined that the best solution would be to use a large concrete block (approximately
1,700 pounds per block) system due to the height of the existing wall and the limited space
available. We worked with the local supplier and their engineer to develop the plans and
specifications for the replacement wall.
Quotes were solicited from three contractors and two responded as follows:
1. Advanced Wall Structures, Inc.
2. Rosti Construction Company
$123,760.00
$222,200.00
Due to the unique nature of this project and the fact that it is an "emergency" replacement project
we felt an acceptable range would be anywhere from $100,000 to $140,000 although there are
not any other feasible options.
It is our recommendation to award the 3025 Island View Drive Retaining Wall Replacement
project be awarded to Advanced Wall Structures, Inc. out of Prior Lake, in the amount of
$123,760.00. This is the same contractor that successfully completed the emergency wall
replacement on Three Points Boulevard earlier this year.
Sincerely,
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P. E.
City Engineer
DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is — — I opportunity employer
-1502-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
3025 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT
WHEREAS, following the large rain events in early June, City staff noticed the existing timber
retaining wall located at 3025 Island View Drive and extending across both adjacent properties
was bulging out and appeared to be in imminent failure status; and
WHEREAS, City staff took immediate precautionary safety measures to limit any potential for
personal injury or property damage; and
WHEREAS, the City's engineer, Bolton & Menk, Inc., was requested to assess the condition
and develop a wall replacement plan and solicit quotes as soon as possible; and
WHEREAS, contact was made with a professional engineer with expertise in evaluating "failing"
retaining walls; and
WHEREAS, the professional engineer recommended immediate replacement of the existing
timber wall and suggested using a "large block" concrete wall system; and
WHEREAS, three retaining wall contractors were contacted to see if they would be interested in
submitting a quote to complete this project as soon as possible; and
WHEREAS, quotes were solicited and received on July 16, 2014 at the office of Bolton & Menk,
Inc. and tabulated as follows:
Advanced Wall Structures, Inc. $123,760.00
Rosti Construction Company $222,200.00
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to
award the contract for the 3025 Island View Drive Retaining Wail Replacement Project to
Advanced Wall Structures, Inc., out of Prior Lake, MN in the amount of $123,760.00.
Adopted by the City Council this 22r1 day of July, 2014
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
Mayor, Mark Hanus
-1503-
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472 -0604
Executive Summary
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director
Date: July 17, 2014
Re: Public Hearing- Ordinance Amending Chapter 129 Related to Zoning —
Swimming Pool Cover Regulations
Summary. The City Council will hold a public hearing as part of its Tuesday, July 22, 2014
meeting to review a proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance. The proposed
amendment would allow for the use of a swimming pool cover as an alternative to installation
of a fence enclosure.
Procedure. Minnesota State Statutes 462.357 Subd.3 states that no zoning ordinance or
amendment can be adopted until a public hearing is held by the planning agency or by the
governing body. Additionally, the notice of the public hearing must also be published at least
(10) days prior to the hearing date. Mound City Code Section 129 -34 (a) (1) requires that any
proposed text amendment which is not initiated by the Planning Commission must be
referred to the Planning Commission for review. Staff has noticed the public hearing for the
proposed zoning amendment in accordance to Minnesota State Statute and City Code.
Background and Discussion.
The Planning Commission, at its June 3rd meeting, reviewed a variance application
requesting waiver of the swimming pool fence enclosure requirements s contained in
the City Code as an automated pool cover was proposed to be installed. Based on its
review, the Planning Commission voted to recommend Council approval, as
recommended by Staff, subject to conditions. Following the Planning Commission
meeting, additional review and discussion took place with the City Attorney about the
use of a variance. It was determined that a better tool with regard to allowing the
use of an automated pool cover is through an amendment to the zoning ordinance.
To be eligible as an fence alternative, the swimming pool cover must meet the
American Standard Testing Materials (ASTM) specification F1346 -91 standard which
includes the following requirements:
The static load test for weight support. The cover should be able to hold a
weight of at least 485 lbs (2 adults and 1 child) to permit rescue operation.
-1504-
Perimeter Deflection Tests far entry or entrapment between the cover and
the side of the pool. The cover must demonstrate that any opening is
sufficiently small and strong enough to prevent the test object being
passed through.
The Surface Drainage Test which safeguards against a dangerous amount
of water collecting on the cove ✓s surface.
- Labeling requirements must include basic consumer information such as
the warranty information, the appropriate warnings as described in the
standard, and acknowledge the product as a safety cover.
2. The Planning Report for the aforementioned variance, included a listing of cities and
townships that currently allow use of a pool cover in lieu of a fence. The list was
provided by the applicant and property owner. Some of the communities listed were
Buffalo, Independence, Deephaven, New Market, Greenfield, Inver Grove Heights,
Rogers, Northfield, Rochester, Scandia and Minnetrista. A copy of an informational
handout from the City of Inver Grove Heights has been included which contains
provisions that allow the use of pool covers.
3. The proposed amendment was reviewed by the Consultant Planner and City Attorney
and includes their suggestions. It was also forwarded to the Police Chief, the Building
Official, the Fire Chief, the City Manager and the Finance Director /City Clerk. The
Building Official and Finance Director /City Clerk responded that the draft was
acceptable. The Fire Chief commented that he had no issues.
4. Council members are advised that the Planning Report for the pool cover variance
mentioned that the Planning Commission may wish to discuss possible amendments
to the City Code to allow the use of a pool cover system. Also, as part of the Planning
Commission's review and discussion of the variance application, Commissioner
Retterath commented that he was supportive of changing the code to allow for the
pool cover alternative.
Planning Commission Review and Recommendation.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance amendment at its July in
meeting. The majority of the Planning Commission's discussion focused on the ASTM
standards that must be met for the pool enclosure. The Planning Commission was favorable
to the proposed amendment and unanimously voted to recommend Council approval, as
recommended by Staff. A copy of the July 1" Planning Commission meeting minute excerpts
have been included as an attachment.
Requested Action. Approval.
® Page 2
-1505-
MINUTE EXCERPTS
i1AWxVAjXwHTTk' •, • •,
JULY 1, •,
Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin
Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist. Staff
present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and
Secretary Jill Norlander.
6 ..fit
Discussion /action — Review of amendment to zoning ordinance related to swimming pool
covers
Smith reviewed the history of the pool cover issue. A proposed ordinance has been drafted for
review. The ASTM minimum standard will be required.
Retterath commented t t the ht b as Ar'a lause requ "no regular maintenance.
Smieja stated that he fel ` red at th µ'n correctly plat d the responsibility on the
property owner.
Retterath said that, if it passed the City Attorney's review it is good enough for him.
MOTION by Wegscheid, second by Gawtry, to recommend approving the changes. MOTION
carried unanimously.
-1506-
CITY OF MOUND
ORDINANCE -2014
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 129 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES
TO ZONING
The City of Mound does ordain:
Section 1. Subsection 129- 196(b)(1) of the Mound City Code is hereby amended to add the
following new language:
Sec. 129 -196.
(b) Swimming pools and hot tubs. Within any residential district, swimming pools and hot
tubs shall be permitted subject to the following restrictions:
(1) Swimming pools. Swimming pools having a water depth of two feet or more
which are operated for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents of the
principal use and their guests are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
a. Swimming pools shall be subject to the following setbacks:
1. The side yard setback is ten feet.
2. The corner lots, from the side street setback is 15 feet.
3. The rear yard setback is 15 feet.
4. Lakeshore, from the ordinary high -water line setback is 50
feet.
5. From any structure on same lot the setback is ten feet.
6. From principal building on an adjoining lot the setback is
20 feet.
b. Private swimming pools are prohibited in the front portion of
residential parcels. The front portion includes the area extending
across the entire width of the lot and situated between the front
line of the principal building and the front lot line.
c. The swimming pool shall be entirely enclosed by a protective
fence or other permanent structure not less than five feet nor more
than six feet in height. Such protective enclosures shall be
maintained by locked gates or entrances when tended by
qualified and re6pansible person a responsible person is not
present outdoors and within 25 feet of the pool.
d. As an alternative to a protective fence or other permanent
structure as required by subsection (b)(1)c of this section an
automatic pool cover may be utilized if it meets the American
Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) F1346 -91 Standard
-1507-
(2010) as such standards may be modified superseded or
replaced by ASTM Such pool cover shall be closed when a
responsible person is not present outdoors and within 25 feet of
the pool.
Passed by the City Council this _ day of
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
2014
Mayor Mark Hanus
Published in the Laker the of , 2014.
Effective the day of 2014.
13
LExcerpts from Mound City Codo,
Section 129-196
Requirements applicable to all residential districts.
(b) Swimming pools and hot tubs. Within any residential district, swimming pools and
hot tubs shall be permitted subject to the following restrictions:
2010
(1) Swimming pools. Swimming pools having a water depth of two feet or
more which are operated for the enjoyment and convenience of the
residents of the principal use and their guests are permitted provided that
the following conditions are met:
a. Swimming pools shall be subject to the following setbacks:
1. The side yard setback is ten feet.
2. The corner lots, from the side street setback is 15 feet.
3. The rear yard setback is 15 feet.
4. Lakeshore, from the ordinary high -water line setback is 50
feet.
5. From any structure on same lot the setback is ten feet.
6. From principal building on an adjoining lot the setback is
20 feet.
b. Private swimming pools are prohibited in the front portion of
residential parcels. The front portion includes the area extending
across the entire width of the lot and situated between the front
line of the principal building and the front lot line.
C. The swimming pool shall be entirely enclosed by a protective
fence or other permanent structure not less than five feet nor more
than six feet in height. Such protective enclosures shall be
maintained by locked gates or entrances when the pool is not
tended by a qualified and responsible person.
(2) Hot tubs. Outdoor hot tubs shall comply with subsections (b)(1)a and b of
this section with the exception that the setback from any structure on the
same lot shall not apply. Furthermore, all outdoor hot tubs shall be
required to either contain surrounding decking with appropriate guardrails
or shall be secured by a locked cover when not in use.
-1509-
City of Inver Grove Heights
8150 Barbara Avenue
1" Inver Grove Heights MN 55077
Inspections Department
Phone: 651 -450 -2550
Fax: 651 -450 -2502
w inveroroveheiohts.orc
PRIOR TO APPLYING FOR A BUILDING PERMIT PLEASE CONTACT:
1) PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT 651- 450.2569 FOR SETBACK AND IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
INFORMATION
2) ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT 651 -450 -2570 FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
REQUIREMENTS
PERMIT (Use Miscellaneous Permit Application for Above Ground Pools and a
Building Permit Application for In- Ground Pools)
A permit application and plot plan must be submitted to the City Inspections Division. Information
provided must include:
4 size
• type of construction
• location of pool on property with setback distances marked
• fencing type and location
• pool cover information (if applicable)
FEES
Contact the Inspections Department at 651 - 450 -2550 for permit fee information.
Payment can be made by cash, check, or major credit card.
SETBACKS
Swimming pools, hot tubs, spas and inflatable pools shall be set back a minimum of ten (10) feet from
any side or rear lot line as measured from the nearest edge of the slope around the pool, the perimeter
walk, or the edge of the pool (whichever is closer to said lot line). The setback is measured from the
outside edge of the pool, or if so equipped, the edge of a perimeter walk. A minimum six (6) foot
separation is required between the principal structure and any accessory structure (including pools).
Swimming pools, hot tubs, spas, and inflatable pools are not allowed in the front or side yards or in the
area between the street right -of way and the minimum required building setback line.
DRAINAGE OF SITE
Swimming pools, hot tubs, spas, and inflatable pools which raise the existing elevation more than eight
(8) feet shall be reviewed by the Building Official who shall have the right to refuse the permit for
-1510-
construction of the same is, in his opinion, adjoining properties will be adversely affected because of the
alteration of drainage patterns.
DRAINAGE OF POOL
The drainage of swimming pools, hot tubs, spas, and inflatable pools shall not discharge across
adjoining properties.
IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
Please note that in the "R" residential zoning districts, there is a maximum impervious coverage
standard. Please contact the Planning Office at 651 - 450 -2553 if your property is in one of these districts.
FENCING
A minimum four (4) foot non - climbable fence or approved barrier is required around outdoor swimming
pools, hot tubs, spas, and inflatable pools or around the property.
Exceptions to the above requirement are:
A. Hot tubs and spas equipped with latching covers conforming to ASTM F 1346 -91, Standard
Performance Specifications for Safety Covers and Labeling Requirements.
Note: Label must be visible at time of inspection.
B. Inflatable pools with a surface area of fourteen (14) or less feet in diameter, and less than thirty
(30) inches in depth from the deepest point to the spill level, and erected between Memorial Day
and Labor Day.
C. Pool covers conforming to ASTM F 1346 -91, Standard Performance Specifications for Safety
Covers and Labeling Requirements.
Note: Label must be visible at time of inspection.
D. Pools with at least 4 foot high side walls with removable ladder.
In instances where the hot tub or spa contains a latching cover or the pool contains a cover or the fence
has a door or gate, then the property owner must keep the cover closed and the door and gate closed
unless a resident of the property is present outdoors and within 25 feet of the hot tub, spa or pool.
If the fence is equipped with doors or gates, then the doors or gates shall be self - closing, latching and
childproof.
POOL HEATER
A separate Mechanical Permit is required for the installation of pool heating equipment.
OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL
A minimum of ten (10) feet horizontal clearance must exist between the inside edge of swimming pools
and overhead power service lines (National Electrical Code, Section 680 -8). For special situations or
further information, contact Gary Pederson, State Electrical Inspector at 952 - 431 -3565.
UTILITY LINES
Contact Gopher State One Call at 651 - 454 -0002 n.tnr to digging to have utility lines marked.
-1511-
s i -a
1.
BUILDING SITE ADDRESS ZIP CODE
,o
to
2.
OWNER NAME ADDRESS PHONE (HOME) (WORK)
3.
xe
CONTRACTOR ADDRESS PHONE (FAX)
4.
ARCHITECT /ENGINEER ADDRESS PHONE (FAX)
5.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE (attach if long description)
6.
CLASS OF WORK: NEW ❑ ADDITION ❑ REMODEVALTERATION ❑ OTHER ❑
7.
DESCRIBE WORK
to
M
M
a.
USE OF BUILDING
9.
CONSTRUCTION DATA:
p
Setbacks: Front Square Feet: Basement Garage
Right Side 1st Floor Porch
W
Left Side 2nd Floor Deck
Rear Side 3rd Floor Other
Structure Height: VALUATION (incl. Labor):
10.
The undersigned acknowledges that he /she has read this application and that the above is correct and
agrees to comply with all the ordinances and laws of the City of Inver Grove Heights regulating building
construction.
SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE
NOTICE: This is an application only. Permit will be issued after city approval and payment of fees.
MWASNaam
5.: .'tom s3 s ?:a:' OFFICE USE ONLY
FEE TYPE AMOUNT RECEIPT CODE
Zoning
Occupancy
Type of Constr.
# of Stories
Bdrm /Dwelling Units
Max. Occup. Load
Sprinklered
Application Accepted By
License No.
Building Insp. Approval
Planning Approval
Engineering Approval
Fire Marshal Approval
Approved to Issue By
Date Approved
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Contractors License
Building Permit
Plan Review
Surcharge
Sprinkler /Alarm Permit
Misc. Permits (Sign, Fence)
MCWS Sac Charge
Sewer Connection Fee
Water Connection Fee
Water Treatment Fee
Meter Sale
Tax on Meter
B -Line Sewer Connection
Park Dedication Fees
Eagan Utility Connections
Other Forms & Fees
TOTAL FEE
Receipt #
Date Issued
*APPLICANT NOT TO SEPARATE SHEETS*
AK
AL
AM
BR
AO
AR
BP
BD
BC
CD
WD
BO
BE
80
CA
AS
NOTICE: Inspections made by the City are a public service and do not constitute any representation, guarantee or warranty,
either implied or expressed, to any p 'a the condition of the building Inspected.
8150 Barbara Ave. • Inver Grove -1 IA71N 55077 • Inspections 651- 450 -2550
CP 9 -6002
R
nAJL
crry ar- r�sourri� ..
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 17, 2014
To: Mayor and City Council
�a
From: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administrative Services t_. L;.L tx
Subject: 2014 Bond Issues
Stacie Kvilvang, Senior Financial Advisor for Ehlers and Associates, will be present at the
meeting to discuss the 2014 bond issues.
The 2014A bonds will finance the following projects:
2014 STREETS PROJECTS COST SUMMARY
PORCEMAIN/
STREET
TOTAL PROJECT
WATERMAIN
STORM SEWER
SANITARY SEWER
RETAINING WALL
CONSTRUCTION
COSTS
PROJECT:
PROJECT 1: THREE POINTS BLVD - AVOCET
TO END
$1,165,138.17
$178,783.00
$41,574.34
$12,958.24
$525,118.98
$1,923,572.73
PROJECT 2: BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN
IMPROVEMENTS
$839487.35
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$839,487.35
PROJECT 3: THREE POINTS BLVD -
COMMERCE TO AVOCET UTILITIES
$532,214.96
$90,36181
$316,830.17
$6,516.38.
$89,953.031
$1,035,878.34
TOTAL PROJECT COST (STREET):
$2,536,840.48
$269,146.81
$358,464.51
$19,474.61
$615,072.01
$3,798,938.42
GRAN DVIEW LIFT STATION
$367,381.30
$367,381.30
SANITARY SEWER CIPP LINING
$150,000.00
$150,000.00
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
$108,060.00
$108,060.00
$50,000.00
OUTLET CLEANING AND REPAIRS
$50,000.00
EMERGENCY RETAINING WALL - THREE
$38,191.50
$38,197.50
POINTS
EMERGENCY RETAINING WALL -
$113,332.50
$113,332.50
ISLANDVIEW
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS:
$2,536,840.48
$427,206.81
$675,785.61
$170,996.61
$615,072.01 -
$4,625,903.72
In addition, the Council approved the purchase of a sewer vac truck at the June 24, 2014 Council
meeting. Staff has analyzed the Sewer Fund reserves as well as a lease purchase agreement, and
has determined issuing bonds payable over 10 years to be the most advantageous option. The
truck will be finance and purchased in 2014 with debt service and depreciation beginning in
2015.
Lastly, interest rates continue to be favorable making refunding of prior bond issues worthwhile.
Series 2014B Refunding Bonds will refund the 2005 bond issues.
Please let Catherine know if you have any questions regarding this matter at (952)472 -0633.
-1513-
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
July 22, 2014
City of Mound, Minnesota
$5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A
Prepared by:
Stacie Kvilvang
Senior Financial Advisor
And
Jason Aarsvold
Financial Advisor
-1514-
Proposed Issue:
$5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A `
Purposes:
The proposed issue includes financing for the following purposes:
2014 road and utility reconstruction projects and the purchase of a vacuum
truck
• $786,071 will be used for street reconstruction projects, including
Three Points Blvd, and other retaining wall projects. Debt service
will be paid from special assessments and a tax levy.
• Approximately $3,839,832 will be for water, storm sewer, and
sanitary sewer work attributable to the respective enterprise funds.
Debt service will be paid with water utility revenues, storm sewer
utility revenues, and sanitary sewer utility revenues.
m Approximately $340,000 of the proceeds will be used to purchase
a vacuum truck. Debt service will be repaid with a-bftxfevy.
-S &wc.r Lt In I i " 14 Sc-i - rr rS .
The street improvement portion of the Bonds is being issued for a 16 -year term
Authority:
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475. Because the City is
assessing at least 20% of the project costs, the Bonds can be a general
obligation without a referendum and will not count against the City's debt
limit. It is the intent of the City to levy approximately $307,536 in special
assessments against benefitting property owners at 2% over the True Interest
Cost (TIC) of the Bonds and staff expects approximately $73,809 in prepaid
special assessments (approximately 24 %). The issue size has been reduced by
the prepayment amount. The assessments will be levied for a 15 -year term,
commencing in 2014, for collection in the years 2015 through 2029 for
payment on the Bonds.
The utility portion is being issued for a 2l- year term pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 444 and 475. Because the utility portion of the bonds is paid
100% with revenues, there is no requirement for a referendum and the Bonds
do not count against the City's debt limit.
The equipment certificate is being issued for a 10 -year term pursuant
Minnesota Statues, Chapter 412.301. For the equipment certificate portion of
the Bonds, the total amount of this Certificate is under .25% of the City's
estimated market value and therefore does not require a publication of a
resolution of intent to issue the bonds or a public hearing. However, this
portion of the Bonds does count against the City's debt limit. There is
approximately $24.5 million of debt that still could be issued. By deducting
the equipment certificate portion from this amount, this reduces the available
debt limit to approximately $24.1 million.
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith, credit
and taxing powers are pledged.
Presale Report — Series 2014A -1515- July 22, 2014
City of Mound, Minnesota Page 1
Term /Call Feature:
The Bonds are being issued for a 21 year term. Principal on the Bonds will be
2016 through 2035. Interest is payable every
due on February I in the years
six months beginning August 1, 2015.
The Bonds maturing on and after February 1, 2024 will be subject to
prepayment at the discretion of the City on February 1, 2023 or any date
thereafter.
B na k Qualification:
Because the City is issuing less than $10,000,000 in the calendar year, the City
Bank
will be able to designate the Bonds as "bank qualified" obligations.
qualified status broadens the market for the Bonds, which can result in lower
interest rates.
The City's most recent bond issues were rated "AA" by Standard & Poor's.
Rating:
The City will request a new rating for the Bonds.
If the winning bidder on the Bonds elects to purchase bond insurance, the
rating for the issue may be higher than the City's bond rating in the event that
the bond rating of the insurer is higher than that of the City.
—
Based on our knowledge of your situation, your objectives communicated to
Basis for Recommendation:
us, our advisory relationship as well as characteristics of various municipal
financing options, we are recommending the issuance of General Obligation
Bonds as a suitable financing option because this is the most overall cost
effective option that still maintains future flexibility for the repayment of debt.
—
Method of Sale /Placement:
the Bonds from local bane �l solicit
competitive banks in your area and
bids for purchase of
regional underwriters.
We have included an allowance for discount bidding equal to 1.100% of the
principal amount of the issue. The discount is treated as an interest item and
provides the underwriter with all or a portion of their compensation in the
transaction.
If the Bonds are purchased at a price greater than the minimum bid amount
(maximum discount), the unused allowance may be used to lower your
borrowing amount.
Premium Bids: Under current market conditions, most investors in municipal
bonds prefer "premium" pricing structures. A premium is achieved when the
coupon for any maturity (the interest rate paid by the issuer) exceeds the yield
to the investor, resulting in a price paid that is greater than the face value of
the bonds. The sum of the amounts paid in excess of face value is considered
"reoffering premium."
The amount of the premium varies, but it is not uncommon to see premiums
for new issues in the range of 2.00% to 10.001/6 of the face amount of the
issue. This means that an issuer with a $2,000,000 offering may receive bids
that result in proceeds of $2,040,000 to $2,200,000.
Presale Report — Series 2014A -1516- July 22, 2014
City of Mound, Minnesota Page 2
For this issue of Bonds we have been directed to use the premium to reduce
the size of the issue for the project. The adjustments may slightly change the
true interest cost of the original bid, either up or down.
You have the choice to limit the amount of premium in the bid
specifications. This may result in fewer bids, but it may also eliminate large
adjustments on the day of sale and other uncertainties.
Review of Existing Debt: We have reviewed all outstanding indebtedness and determined that the 2005A
and 2005B bonds present a current refunding opportunity. The City is set to
consider refunding these bonds as Series 2014B (under separate presale
report).
We will continue to monitor the market and the call dates for the City's
outstanding debt and will alert you to any future refunding opportunities.
Continuing Disclosure: Because the City has more than $10,000,000 in outstanding debt (including
this issue) and this issue is over $1,000,000, the City will be agreeing to
provide certain updated Annual Financial Information and its Audited
Financial Statement amorally as well as providing notices of the occurrence of
certain "material events" to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the
"MSRB "), as required by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). The City is already obligated to provide such reports for its existing
bonds, and has contracted with Ehlers to prepare and file the reports.
Arbitrage Monitoring: Because the Bonds are tax- exempt securities /tax credit securities, the City
must ensure compliance with certain Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rules
throughout the life of the issue_ These rules apply to all gross proceeds of the
issue, including initial bond proceeds and investment earnings in construction,
escrow, debt service, and any reserve funds. How issuers spend bond
proceeds and how they track interest earnings on funds (arbitrage /yield
restriction compliance) are common subjects of IRS inquiries. Your specific
responsibilities will be detailed in the Nonarbitrage Certificate prepared by
your Bond Attorney and provided at closing. We recommend that you
regularly monitor compliance with these rules and /or retain the services of a
qualified firm to assist you.
Risk Factors: Special Assessments: We have assumed $73,809 in pre -paid special
assessments and we have assumed that assessments are levied as projected. If
the City receives significantly more pre -paid assessments, it may need to
increase the levy portion of the debt service to make up for lower interest
earnings than the expected assessment interest rate.
This presale report summarizes our understanding of the City's objectives for the structure and terms of this
financing as of this date. As additional facts become known or capital markets conditions change, we may need
to modify the structure and/or terms of this financing to achieve results consistent with the City's objectives.
Presale Report — Series 2014A -1517- July 22, 2014
City of Mound, Minnesota Page 3
Proposed Debt Issuance Schedule
Pre -Sale Review by City Council
July 22, 2014
Distribute Official Statement:
Week of August 11, 2014
Conference with Rating Agency:
Week of August 18th �I
City Council Meeting to Award Sale of the Bonds:
August 26, 2014
Estimated Closing Date:
September 18, 2014
Attachments
Sources and Uses of Funds
Proposed Debt Service Schedule
Resolution Authorizing Ehlers to Proceed With Bond Sale
Ehlers Contacts
Financial Advisors: Stacie Kvilvang
(651) 697 -8506
Jason Aarsvold
(651) 697 -8512
Disclosure Coordinator: Jen Chapman
(651) 697 -8566
Financial Analyst: Alicia Gage
(651) 697 -8551
The Official Statement for this financing will be mailed to the City Council at their home address or e- mailed for
review prior to the sale date.
Presale Report — Series 2014A -1518- July 22, 2014
City of Mound, Minnesota Page 4
Council Member
Resolution No.
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
Resolution Providing for the Sale of
$5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota has heretofore determined that it is
necessary and expedient to issue the City's $5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A (the
"Bonds "), to finance road and utility reconstruction projects and the purchase of a vacuum truck in the
City; and
B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "), as its
independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. Authorization; Findines. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale
of the Bonds.
2. Meeting Proposal Opening. The City Council shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on August 26, 2014, for the
purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds.
3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby
authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the
Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by City Council Member
_ and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
following City Council Members voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Dated this 22nd day of July, 2014.
-1519-
City Clerk
City of found, Minnesota
$5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A
Issue Summary
Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps
Total Issue Sources And Uses
Dated 09/18/2014 I Delivered 09/1812014
Improvement Storm Issue
Bonds Sewer Fund Water Fund Sewer Fund Equipment Summary .
Sources Of Funds ... .._ ,., .,,. .... ,,,e .,nn nn e�.. non nn ci nni mr, nn
1'ur Amount oti3w ds _
0 /JU,VUU m1
�xvv vom,.o
.,•�..-
- r. -: -_
-. .._ __.
-
73,80100
U , (d Asscssuunis
73 5(19.00
�
_ ____._._
__ __
.. ... __.___
$803.809.00
5900,000.00
$2,595,000.00
$435,000.00
$345,000,00
__$5,078,809,00
Total Sources _ __
__ .
Uses Of Funds
S,U30.00
9,900.fW
2S,545. o-
-0,785AU
3, 795 00
55 055.0_0
- - _ _. _
I (III Iln I r IIICI F I %N:inl(1 II. (I��o1
-
30,62_7.68
_—
5,134.12
5500000 .
Cost rllvsu.,ncc
- - "
6.67588
10622.32
2,536,839,00
427,20200
340.000 00
4 965.9_03 00
Depo ll [o Ro_ect Constmction Fund
7A6 077.00
- -. - --
875 786.00
2. 85100
._
092.72
3,69168.
(2.126.121
_1;20500
_ _ - -'
Round'nF Amount _._
_(L011.68)
S803.809.00
$900,000.00
$2.595,000.00
$435,000.00
5345.000.00
$5.078,809.00
Total Uses
genes 2014A GO UU106 1 Issue Summery I7/1512D14 1 431 PM
EHLERS
, t All .R_ Ip PDR( IC I NAHCI
-1520-
City of Mound, Minnesota
$5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A
Issue Summary
Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I 105% of Total Levylisurplus)
02/01/2015
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
02/01/2016
195,000.00
0.700%
184,837,34
37983734
395,82921
22,441.76
376,387.45
02/01/2017
235,00000
1000%
13360750
368,607.50
387,037,88
22.44775
364,596.13
02/01/2018
245,00000
1250%
131257.50
376,257.50
395,070.38
22,44176
372,62862
02/0112019
_ 255,00000
1.550%
2222 2172 1717
128,195.00
2217. 2222_.
383,19500
402,354.75
22,44176
2172.. _
37991299
02/01/2020
255,00000
1850%
124,242.50
379,24250
398,204.63
22,44176
1722
375,762.87
02/01/2021
260,000,00
2150%
119,525.00
379,52500
398,50125
22,44175
376,05950
02/01/2022
260,00000
2350%
113,935.00
373,935.00
392,63175
22,44176
370,18999
0210Jr2023
270,00000
1600%
107,825.00
377,82500
396,71625
22,441,75
374,274.50
02/01/2024
270,00000
40,06_._
2700%
1717._.._
100.80500
1721___ _.—
370,805.00
1721_
389,34515
.�
22,44176
366,90349
.-_.__...
02 /G 1/2025
240,00400
2.850%
93,515.00
333,515.00
35019075
22,441.75
327,749.00
02/01/2026
245,000,00
2950%
86,675,00
331,67500
348,258.75
22,44175
325,81700
02/01/2027
250,000.00
315011
79,447.50
329,447.50
345,919.88
22,44176
323,47812
02101/2028
255,000.00
3 250'.
71,572 50
326,572 50
342,901.13
22,441.75
320,459 38
022/01/2029
270,000 00
3 350".
63,285 00
1721_._
333,285 00
2171._ 2171_.1717
349,949 25 1717__
22,441.75
327,507 50
02/0112030
250,600.00
._ _.
3450%
54,24000
334,24000
350,952.00
.2..__1 _ 1721.
22,441.76
- 1717__.1724
328,51024
02/01/2031
225,000,00
3.550 °.5
44,580.00
269,580.00
283,059 DO
283,059.00
02N1/2032
235,000.00
3600%
36,59250
271,592.50
255,17213
-
285,17213
02/00033
240,00000
1650:,
28,132.50
268,132.50
281,539.13
-
281,539.13
02/01/2034
255,00000
3700 °6
_19,372.50 _
_274,37250
288,091.13 _
288,091.13
02/01/2035
-65,000 GO
3750%
9,937.50
274,937.50
288,684.38
-
288,68438
Tate] $5,005,000.00 - $1,731,579.84 56,736,579.84 $7,073,408.83 $336,626.33 $6,736,782.50
significant Dates
Dated
rirsl Couuo,, 1Jaic
_ 1721 1722 _.
Bond Year Dot tars _
Average Life
A ei C'ou }-:;n
Net lntcrost Cost rNIC)
True LneresJ Cost ('IJC)
1717. .. 2171. _- _ 1722 1717. 1721...
flood Yield for Arbitrage Auposes
1717 2217__ _ 2221.._ . 1717
AUlnclustve Cost[A1C)
Se,ioe 2014A G0 UtS1ty 8 I Issue Summary 1711`1Y414:31 PM
EHLERS
I I'. AOrr RS IN Ptl 11 Ir] I I% ANC[
1521-
9118/2014
8 /01/2015
534,964 07
10 982 Years
3.1503851.%
3.2505505%
3.2265519%
3.1036653
1717__ 2,171,__ 33512772%
City of Mound, Minnesota
$5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A
Improvement Bonds
Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Significant Dates
9/18/2014
Dated .___
-.... _ .___.___ - __.- _.__.______ -_ ----
105% of
Pint Coupon Date
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +l
Total
Assessments
Levy /(Surplus)
02/01/2015
02/01/2016
35,00000
0700%
-
24,369.26
59,36926
62,337,72
22,441.76
39,89596
02/01/2017
45,000,00
1000%
17,550 00
62,550.00
65,677 50
22,441 75
43,235 75
02/01/2018
45,00000
1.250%
17,10000
62,10000
65,205.00
22,44176
42,76324
02/01/2019
45,00000
1.550%
16,537.50
61,53750
64,61438
22441.76
_ 42.17262
(12/01/2020
45,00000
1.850%
15,840.00
60,840.00
63,88200
22,43176
4),44024
02/01/2021
45,000.00
2150%
15,007.50
60,007.50
63,007.88
22,44175
40,566.13
02101/2022
45,00000
2350%
14,040.00
59,04000
61,992.00
2244176
39,55024
02/01/2023
50,00000
2600%
12,982.50
62,98250
66,131.63
22,441.75
43,689.88
02/01/2024
50,00000
2700%
11682.50
6168250
64.76663
22A41 76
_42,324:87
02/01 /2625
50,000 00
2 85001.
10,332.50
60,33250
63,349 13
22,44175
40,907 38
02/0112026
50,000.00
2950%
8,90750
58907,50
61,852,88
22,44175
39,411.13
02/01/2027
55,00000
3150%
7,432.50
62,432.50
65,55413
22,44176
43,11237
02/01/2028
55,000 00
3250%
5,70000
60,700 00
63,735.00
22,441.75
41,293 25
02/01/2029
55,00000
3350%
3.91250
58,912.50
61,858.13
22,441,75
39:41638
02/G7/2030
60,00000
3450%
2,070,00
62,07000
1
42,731.74
Total
5730,000.00
-
5183,464.26
5913,464.26
5959,137.47
%336,626.33
5622,511.14
Significant Dates
9/18/2014
Dated .___
-.... _ .___.___ - __.- _.__.______ -_ ----
_
8/01/2015
Pint Coupon Date
Yield Statistics
$6.464,69
__ _ -___ ._ -_.. ..
Bond Year Dollars _
8.856 Years
Average Life
29379417%
Averav Coupon
2.9621548%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)- - - - - -- _
2.9509144So
:1 No Interest Cost (TIC) "
3.1036653%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes._ -- - ""
31083563%
A11lnclusive CostfAIC) ._.__..____
______ _
q,d-2014A GO UIl[iW & I improvement Bonds 1 7/512014 1 4,31 PM
E 1-11LE RS
-1522-
City of Mound, Minnesota
$5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A
Sewer Fund
Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Significant Dates
Dated
First CoOgon Dmt
Yield Statistic
Aond Year Dollars
A-mg.
Net interest Cost (N_IC)
Tme lntemelC at MCI
Pnr Arbltcace Pt¢povs _
frond Ytela .
All lndtuive Cost(AIC) _ 4444
IRS Form
9/18/2014
8/012015
$10,68250
1869 Years
32362873%
3.3289622%
].3084822%
3 1036653%
3 4346725
N4igWcd \ mg, blew t1 IL8001bnrs
_
So -a 2014A 00 UCIIK &I Sower Fund 1 7/15/0014 14,31 P"
E 1523
$051
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +I
Overlevy
Fiscal Total
09/1312014
08/01/2015
-
-
22,08389
22,08389
23,188.08
-
02/0 V2016
30,00000
0.700%
12,70000
42,700.00
44,83500
68,02308
08/01/2016
-
-
12,59500
12,59500
13,224.75
-
02/01/2017
39.00D 00
1.000%
12,59500
- 47.595.00
49,974.75
_ 63,19950
4114 -1In 17
OR/Ol/2017
-
-
12,420.00
12,42000
13,04100
-
02/0112018
35,00000
1250%
12,42000
47,42000
49,79100
62,83200
U8 /01/2018
-
-
12,20125
12,201 25
12,811.31
-
02/01/2019
40,000w
1550%
12,20125
52201.25
54,81131
67,62263
os /01/2019
-
-
11891.25
_ 1112 _
11,891.25
_ _. __
17A 95 hI
- _ _ 1411 _ _..
-
4114 4144 _
_
02/0112020
1141 .. _
40,00900
_.. _
1850 °'0
11,89125
51,891.25
54,485 91
66,9]163
08701/2020
-
-
11,52125
11,52125
12,09731
-
02/0112021
40,00000
2150%
11 ,52125
51,52125
54,097.31
66,194 63
08/01/2021
-
-
1109115
11,091.25
11,645.81
-
O2OI12022
40.000.00
2350%
11.091.25
-_.
- 5109125 _.
_ 53,645.81
_ _ _ 1411
6529163
__.
4118 4144.
08/01/2022
4411 _.
-
-
10,62]25
10,621.25
]1,15231
-
02/01/2023
40,000.00
2600%
10,62125
50,62125
53,15231
64,30463
08/01/2023
-
-
10,10125
10,10125
10,60631
-
021Ol/2024
40,00000
2.700%
10,101.25
50,10125
526063)
63,21163
09/01[2024
-
-_
9,561.25
. _. -
9,56125
4141 _.. _.
10,03931
-
02/01/2025
45,000,00
2850%
9,56125
54,56125
57,28931
6],32863
08/0112025
-
-
8,92000
8,92000
9,366.00
-
02A11206
45,00000
2950%
8,92000
53,92000
56,61600
65,98200
OR /OI/2026
-
-
8,25625
8,25625
8,66906
-
02/0112n°7
45,00 00
3.150%
825625
.444__
53.256.25
55. 919 06
64,588.13
.._144__
O8 /U 62027
-
-
7,54].50
7,54].50
7,924.80
-
02A1/2028
45,000.00
3.250%
7,547.50
52,547,50
55,17488
63,099.75
08/01/2028
-
6,81625
6,81625
7,15706
-
02/01M129
50,000G3
3350%
6,81625
56,816,25
59,65706
66,814.13
08/01/2029
-
5,97875
.__._�_
5.97875
_..__-_
__.6_277_69 ..._._.__._055._8.
-
.2 o
02/Dl/20J0
_ 1411..4144
50,00000
__
3-050%
5,97375
55,97[2.75
5H ]77 GY
65,05538
08/01/2030
-
-
5,11625
5,11625
5,37206
-
02/01/2031
50,000.00
3550%
5,11625
55,116.25
57,87206
63,244.13
08/0U2031
_
-
4,22875
422975
4,440]9
-
02/OIP2032
55,00000
3600%
4,22875
_._.__.._
59,22875
_.__,
62,190.19
- 66,630.38
08/01/2032
-
4444___
-
;23875
3,238.]5
340069
-
02/01/2033
55000.00
3,650%
3,23875
56,23805
61,15069
64,55138
08101/2033
-
-
223500
2,235,00
2,346.75
02101/2034
60,000 00
3.700%
2,235,00
62,235 00
65,346 75
67,693.50
0
08/01.'2 34
'.
4
1125 00
1.125.00
-
1,18125
1441
__ -
02/01/2035
60,00000
411.
3750`7..
_
1,)25.00
61,12500
64,18125
65,362.50
T00a1
59001000.00
$345,716.39
51,245,716.39
$1.308,062.21
Significant Dates
Dated
First CoOgon Dmt
Yield Statistic
Aond Year Dollars
A-mg.
Net interest Cost (N_IC)
Tme lntemelC at MCI
Pnr Arbltcace Pt¢povs _
frond Ytela .
All lndtuive Cost(AIC) _ 4444
IRS Form
9/18/2014
8/012015
$10,68250
1869 Years
32362873%
3.3289622%
].3084822%
3 1036653%
3 4346725
N4igWcd \ mg, blew t1 IL8001bnrs
_
So -a 2014A 00 UCIIK &I Sower Fund 1 7/15/0014 14,31 P"
E 1523
City of Mound, Minnesota
$5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A
Water Fund
Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Total 52595, 000,00 3995, 822,46 53,590,822.46
$3,770,363.58
Significant Dates
105%
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total Pal
Overlevy
Fiscal Total
_
09/18/2014
-
330,783.71
- -__. ____ -_....
-
1,
Aveage Coupon
08/0/2015
Net lmeresl Cost MICI
33276285%
63,68246
63,692,46
66,866.58
-
02/01=16
9000000
0700%
36,622.50
116,62250
122,453.63
189,3202)
0810112016
-
-
36,34250
36,342 50
38,159.63
-
02101/2017
105,_000 00
1 000%
36.34250
141,342 50
_ _ 148,409 63
_ 186,569 25
08/012017
-
35,81750
35,817,50
37,60838
-
02/0IRO18
110'00000
1250%
3581750
145,817.50
153,10838
190,71675
08/01/2018
35,13000
35,13000
36,88650
-
02/01R019
110,0000),
1550%
35,730.00
145,130,00
152,38650
189,273.00
0 q
/0).0,..
-
34,277,50
34,27750
3599138
-
_-
6 /01/2020
110,00000
__.
1850 °0
3d,2D 50
]44,2]750
]51,49138
187,482.75
08/01/2020
-
-
33,26000
33,260.00
34,92300
-
02/0112021
115,00000
2.150%
33,260.00
149,260.00
155,67300
190,596,00
08/01/2021
-
-
32,023.75
32,023.75
33,62494
-
02101/2022
115,000,00
2350 %32,023.75
147.023,75
154,374,94
-.
__
_
- _
30,67250
30,672..50
32,206.13
-
02/012023
120,00000
2600%
30,672.50
150,672.50
158,206 13
190,41225
09;01/2023
-
29,11250
29,112.50
30,568.13
-
02/01/2024
126,000.00
2900%
29,112.50
149,11250
156,56813
18713625
08/0112024
_
27,49250 _
27, 492 50
_
_ _28,86713
02/01/2025
125,000.00
2.850%
27,49250
152,49250
160,11713
168,98425
09/01/2025
-
-
25,711.25
25,711.25
26,996 81
-
0110 0026
130,00000
2950%
25,71125
155,71125
163496.81
190,49363
OWI)Ii226
-
-
23,79355
23,79375
2498344
-
0210112027
130.000 00
3 15_09.
_ 23,793 75
153799 75 ��
-_- 161j485 44 _
1 _
- -�� 9G41713
08!01/_027
_
j�,746 25
2j,746 25
22,833 56
02;01/2028
13.`.,00000
3250%
119,55250
120,530,13
18],417.13
OS /01/228
19,55250
OZ/O(/2029
140,000.00
3350%
19,552,50
159,55250
167,530.13
188,060.25
O9NI/2029
-
17207.50
. ____ _
17,207.50
___._.._
18.06288
--170,317 .
-
-.. ___. _._..
02/01/2030
145,000.00
.. _ ._. _.
3450%
]7,20750
762,20750
88
08/0)/2030
-
-
14,706.25
14,706.25
15,441.56
-
02/01/2031
150,00000
3550%
14,70625
164,70625
172,94156
188,38313
08/0112031
-
12,043,75
12,043 75
12,645.94
-
02N1/2032
155,00000
3.600%
12,613.75
167,04375
_ 175395,94
_ 188.04188
08/019032
-
-
9,253.75
9,25375
971644
-
02/01/2033
160,00000
3650%
9,253.75
169,25375
177,71644
187,43288
08/01/2033
-
-
6,333.75
6,33375
6,65044
-
02/01/2034
165,000.00
3700%
6,333.75
171,33375
179,900.44
186,550,88
GR/01/7014
-
-
3281.25
3,281,25
02/01/2035
_
77500000
3 50%
3,281.25
178,28125
18],1953]
190,640.63
Total 52595, 000,00 3995, 822,46 53,590,822.46
$3,770,363.58
Significant Dates
Yield Statistics
Bond Ycar Dollars _- _ _ - -._.
330,783.71
- -__. ____ -_....
_ _ _
Avetxee I,re
1,
Aveage Coupon
34 009%
Net lmeresl Cost MICI
33276285%
- --
lute C- TL 1 - __ __ _._
,_ _ _
33071918%
- - --
d __
Band Yl- forAr-- s - _. ..____
B,u
3.1036653
- _._ - -__. _
_._.. Cost___,. ,Coos .. _____
-- -- - --
All Inclusive Cost rAICI___,___
._._ 34334095 °'°
IRS Form 8038
Not inmmst Cost - -_ - .._ ..._
__ -.- _ 009%
Neiehted Amt,, Matwh,
11 863 Y
_ ears
tsn-e 2014A GO Jffll y 8 I Waw Fund 1 7/152014 1 4:31 PM
EHLERS
I -1524-
of Mound, Minnesota
$5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A
Storm Sewer Fund
Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Significant Dates
Dated
Fht Coupo Dme
Yield Statistics
Bond Yev Dollazs
Avca¢e Life
Avemee Coupon
9/18/2014
8/01/2015
55.135 ]1
- 3.2327987%
Net Interest Cw(NIC) _ _ 33259698'%
1,1,11
Tme lntuest Cost (TIC) 3 3043805
Bond Ytcld fo lvbtraBe Pupoaes - _ _ 31036653%
_11, - -_ - _
All Tnolusive Cost (AIC)
_24311641%
IRS Form
Cost eresl l
NO nt oe /Ta l i
1111 _. - _ .. 11,1,1, 71,17 11,17. 1,1,1,1, 7111 1,11,.1,
Weighted Avenge Maturity _. 11.806 Years
1,1,71 1,177 1177_ 111,1, _
.unoe 20t4A GO UEliy8 Slorm Seve/FUnd 19/15/2014 1 431 PM
L F
-1525-
105%
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +I
Overlevy
Fiscal Total
09/19/7014
-
-
-
-
-
IWO 1201 s
10,624.61
10,624 61
11,155 84
02/01/2016
15,00000
0700%
6,11000
21,110.00
22,165.50
33,321.34
08 /01 /2016
-
-
6,05750
6,05750
6,36038
-
02101/2017
11,00000
1.000%
6.05750
71 -- 7777
21,05750
. - -. "5677-----
22,110.38
28.470.75
--- - -___-
7777 111,1 711,1,
08 /01/2D17
-
-
_-- 7777
-
5,98250
5,90250
6,28163
02"23 1/2018
20,00"110
1250%
5,98250
25,9825D
27,28163
33,56325
08/012018
-
-
5,857.50
5,857.50
6,150.38
-
02101/2019
20,00000
1550%
5857.5D
25857.50
27,150.38
33,3075
08D11,2019
-
-
_ _5702.50
5.70250_
_ 5:98763
-
02101/2020
20,00000
1850%
5,70250
25,70250
26,987,63
32,97525
081012020
-
5,517,50
531750
5,793.33
-
02/012021
20,00000
2150%
5,51750
25,51750
26,793,38
32,58675
08/012021
-
-
5,30250
5,30250
5,567.63
02/01/2022
20,00000
2350%
5,30250-
25,30250
--
26,567.63
_ 32,13525
.. 11,1,1..
_
_
5,06750
5,32088
02/0112023
20,000.00
2600%
5,06750
25,067,50
26,320 98
3164175
08/01/2023
-
-
4,807.50
4,80750
5,04788
-
02/01/2024
2000000
2700%
4,80750
24,80750
26,04708
31,095.75
08/01/2024
4,537.50
4537,50 _
4,76438
02101/1025
20,00000
2.850%
"53]50
- ^4,537.50
25,764.38
30,52875
08/01/2025
-
-
4,25250
4,25250
4,465 13
-
02/01/2026
20'000.00
29505'6
4,252.50
24,2525D
25,465 -13
29,93025
08101/2026
-
-
3,95250
3,957.50
4,15538
02/01/2027
2000000
3150% _
395750
23,957.50
25,15538
29.310.75
11_
OA(01/2027
-
-
3,64250
3,642.50
3,82463
-
02/01(2028
20,00000
3250%
364250
23,64250
24,82463
28,64925
03/01/2028
-
-
3,31730
3,317.50
3,483.38
-
02/01/2029
25,00000
3350%
3,317.50
28,317,50
29,73338
33,21675
2,89875
289875 ....._.__.___..
3.043 69
_08/01,2029
02/01/2030
25,OCJ 00
3,450%
2,898.75
27,89675
29,29369
32,337.38
08'11 1/2030
-
-
2,467.50
2,467.50
2,59088
-
02/012031
2500000
3550 %,
2,467.50
27,467.50
28,84088
31,43175
08M/2031
-
-
2,02375
2,023 75
2,12494
02/01/2032
25.00000
3500%
2,023,75
._1,573_ 71,11,
27.02375
28.37494
1,111
30,49988
___.-__
OS/01/2032
-
-
1,573.75
1,573]5
1,65244
-
02/01/2033
25,0000
3.650%
1,573.75
26,573.75
27,902.44
29,554 88
08101/2033
-
-
1,11750
1,11750
1,173.38
-
02/01/2034
30,00000
3,700%
1,117,50
31,117.50
32,67338
33,046_]5
08101/2034
17
562.50
562.50
565
590.63
_ -6812.
11,02/ .35 11
02/01/2035
1 1
30,00000
0
'+750%
56250
30,562,50
32,09063
32
32,68125
Tole]
$435,000.00
5166,027.11
5601,027.11
5631,098.47
Significant Dates
Dated
Fht Coupo Dme
Yield Statistics
Bond Yev Dollazs
Avca¢e Life
Avemee Coupon
9/18/2014
8/01/2015
55.135 ]1
- 3.2327987%
Net Interest Cw(NIC) _ _ 33259698'%
1,1,11
Tme lntuest Cost (TIC) 3 3043805
Bond Ytcld fo lvbtraBe Pupoaes - _ _ 31036653%
_11, - -_ - _
All Tnolusive Cost (AIC)
_24311641%
IRS Form
Cost eresl l
NO nt oe /Ta l i
1111 _. - _ .. 11,1,1, 71,17 11,17. 1,1,1,1, 7111 1,11,.1,
Weighted Avenge Maturity _. 11.806 Years
1,1,71 1,177 1177_ 111,1, _
.unoe 20t4A GO UEliy8 Slorm Seve/FUnd 19/15/2014 1 431 PM
L F
-1525-
City of Mound, Minnesota
$5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A
Equipment
Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Total 5345,000.00 $40,549.62 $385,549.62 $404,827.10 -
Significant Dates
Dated _ 9/18/2014
rust Coupon Date 8/01/2015
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollarsn
Average Life ..
5.500 Years
Average Coupon
105%
Net Interest Cost {NIC)
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +l
Overlevy
Fiscal Total
09/18/2014
-
Net Interest Cost
-
-
5 500 Years
"
08/01/2015
-
-
5,48837
5,488.37
5,76279
-
02/01/2016
35,00000
0700°/
3,15625
38,156.25
40,064.06
45,826.85
08/01/2016
-
-
3,03175
3,033 75
3,185,44
-
02/0112017
35,00000
1.000% -
_3,03375
_ 38,03375
,.__.39,93544
43,120.88
08/01/2017
-
-
2,858.75
2,85&75
3,00169
-
02/01/2018
35,000.00
1 250%
2,858 75
37,858 75
39,751 69
42,753.38
08/01/2018
-
-
2,640.00
2,640.00
2,772.00
-
02/01/2019
40,00000
1.550�i6
2,640,00
42,64000
44,77200
47,54400
08/01/2019
-
-
2,330.00
233000 -_
2,446.50
02/01/2020
40,00000
1850%
2,330.00
42,33000
44,44650
46,893.00
08/03/2020
-
-
1,96000
1,960.00
2,058.00
-
02/01/2021
40,00000
2150%
1,96000
41,96000
44,058.00
46,11600
08/01/2021
-
-
1,53000
1,53000
1,606.50
-
02/01/2022
40,00000
2350% _ _
1,530.00
4153000
43,60650
45,21300
___
08/01/2022
-
-
1,060.00
1,06000
1,113.00
-
02/01/2023
4000000
2600%
1,06000
4] 06000
43,113.00
44,226.00
08/0112023
-
-
540,00
540.00
56700
-
02/01/2024
40,00000
2700%
540.00
40,54000
42,56700
43,134.00
Total 5345,000.00 $40,549.62 $385,549.62 $404,827.10 -
Significant Dates
Dated _ 9/18/2014
rust Coupon Date 8/01/2015
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollarsn
Average Life ..
5.500 Years
Average Coupon
2.1370493%
Net Interest Cost {NIC)
2,3370537%
-- -' -' -" _ - -
2.3389031% _
Band Yield for Arbitrage Purposes _
3.1036653
All inclusive Cost (AIC) _. _. -
,. 2,3389031%
IRS Form 8038
Net Interest Cost
_ 2 1370493%
Weighted Average Maturity
5 500 Years
Series 2014A GO Uil111y8 1 Equipment 1 7/1512014 1 4.31 PM
EHLERS
, I .-.,_i ` P, i nr' :..,.. ,.
1526
City of Mound, Minnesota
$5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A
Assessments
Equal P &I - 2% over TIC
Assessments
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +l
12/31/2015
10,87227
4950%
11,569 49
22,441 76
12/31/2016
1141045
4950%
11,03130
22,441.75
12/31/2017
11,97526
4950%
10,466.50
22,441.76
12/31/2018
12,568.04
4950%
9,873.72
22,44176
12/31/2019
13,19016
4_950%
____ 9,25160 ,..
.,..,,.22,441.76
12/312/31/2626
13,843.07
4.95 0%
8,598.68
22,441.75
12/31/2021
14,52830
4.950%
7,91346
22,441,76
12/31/2022
15,247,45
4,95000%
7,19430
22,44175
12/31/2023
16,00120
4.950%
6,439.56
22,44176
12/31/2024
16,79431
4.950%
5,64744
22.441.75
12/31/2025
17,62563
4.950%
4,816.12
22,441.75
12/3112026
18,498.10
4950%
3,943.66
22,441.76
12131/2027
19,413 75
4950%
3,028.00
22,441.75
12/31/2028
20,374.73
4.950%
2,06702
22,441 75
12133/2029
21,383.28
4.950%
_1,058.48
__ 22,441.76
Total
8233,727.00
8102,899.33
$336,626.33
Siqnificant Dates
Filine Date
First Pavmeelt Date
Seres2014A GO UU419 I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 7!15!201414:30 PM
EHLERS
I "1 I.I1;1 ", -1527-
_ 1/01/2015
12/31/2015
City of Mound, Minnesota
$5,005,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014A
Issue Summary
Assumes Current Market BQ AA rates plus 25bps
Detail Costs Of Issuance
Dated 09/1812014 1 Delivered 09118/2014
COSTS OF ISSUANCE DETAIL
Financial Advisor
$35,00400
_ __..
Bond Counsel
_ $12.000,00
Rating Agency Fm (S&P)
Miscellaneous
$1,00000
TOTAL
$55,000.00
Series 2014A GO J141*/ B l Issue Summary 1 711512014 1 4:31 PM
EHLERS
I li, _ i14 ,. "F"
-1528-
July 22, 2014
City of Mound, Minnesota
Series 2014B
Prepared by:
Stacie Kvilvang
Senior Financial Advisor
_m,
Jason Aarsvold
Financial Advisor
-1529-
EHLERS
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FIN.ANCF
Executive Summary of Proposed De
Proposed Issue
$3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
Purposes.
( The proposed issue includes financing for the following purposes:
Current refunding of the 2005A and 2005B Bonds. The 2005A bonds were
issued to finance the 2005 street reconstruction projects. The 2005B bonds
were issued finance 2005 water projects, including a 400,000 gallon water
tower at Chateau. Both series of bonds are callable now, and refunding the
bonds will produce interest savings.
Proposed current refunding of the Series 2005A and 2005B Bonds.
Debt service will be paid from special assessments, utility revenues
and tax levy.
Interest rates on the obligations proposed to be refunded are 4.0% to
4.40 %. The refunding is expected to reduce interest expense by
approximately $297,329 over the next 12 years. The Net Present
Value Benefit of the refunding is estimated to be $267,337, equal to
8.277% of the refunded principal.
This refunding is considered to be a Current Refunding as the
obligations being refunded are callable (pre - payable) now.
Authority:
The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters:
f 429
s 444
475
Because the City is assessing at least 20% of the project costs, the Bonds can
be a general obligation without a referendum and will not count against the
City's debt limit.
Chapter 444 allows cities to issue debt without limitation as long as debt
service is expected to be paid from water and sewer revenues.
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which its full faith, credit
and taxing powers are pledged.
Term /Call Feature:
The Bonds are being issued for a 12 year term (existing term). Principal on
the Bonds will be due on February 1 in the years 2015 through 2026. Interest
is payable every six months beginning February 1, 2015.
The Bonds maturing on and after February 1, 2023 will be subject to
prepayment at the discretion of the City on February 1, 2022 or any date
thereafter.
Bank Qualification:
Because the City is issuing less than $10,000,000 in the calendar year, the City
will be able to designate the Bonds as "bank qualified" obligations. Bank
Presale Report — 2014BBonds -1530- July 22, 2014
City of Mound, Minnesota Page 1
Presale Report — 2014BBonds -1531- July 22, 2014
City of Mound, ]Minnesota Page 2
status broadens the market for the Bonds, which can result in lower
qualified
interest rates. —
—
Rating:
The City's most recent bond issues were rated "AA" by Standard & Poor's.
The City will request a new rating for the Bonds.
If the winning bidder on the Bonds elects to purchase bond insurance, the
rating for the issue may be higher than the City's bond rating in the event that
the bond rating of the insurer is higher than that of the City.
Based on our knowledge of your situation, your objectives communicated to
Basis for Recommendation:
us, our advisory relationship as well as characteristics of various municipal
financing options, we are recommending the issuance of General Obligation
Refunding Bonds as a suitable financing option because this is the most
overall cost effective option that still maintains future flexibility for the
repayment of debt.
Method of Sale /Placement
In order to obtain the lowest interest cost to the City, we will solicit
competitive bids for purchase of the Bonds from local banks in your area and
regional underwriters.
We have included an allowance for discount bidding equal to 1.00000% of the
principal amount of the issue. The discount is treated as an interest item and
provides the underwriter with all or a portion of their compensation in the
transaction.
If the Bonds are purchased at a price greater than the minimum bid amount
(maximum discount), the unused allowance may be used to lower your
borrowing amount.
Premium Bids: Under current market conditions, most investors in municipal
bonds prefer "premium" pricing structures. A premium is achieved when the
coupon for any maturity (the interest rate paid by the issuer) exceeds the yield
to the investor, resulting in a price paid that is greater than the face value of
the bonds. The sum of the amounts paid in excess of face value is considered
"reoffering premium."
The amount of the premium varies, but it is not uncommon to see premiums
for new issues in the range of 2.00% to 10.00% of the face amount of the
issue. This means that an issuer with a $2,000,000 offering may receive bids
that result in proceeds of $2,040,000 to $2,200,000.
For this issue of Bonds we have been directed to use the premium to reduce
the size of the issue. The adjustments may slightly change the true interest
cost of the original bid, either up or down.
You have the choice to limit the amount of premium in the bid
specifications. This may result in fewer bids, but it may also eliminate large
adjustments on the day of sale and other uncertainties.
Review of Existing Debt:
We have reviewed all outstanding indebtedness for the City and find that
other than the obligations proposed to be refunded by the Bonds, there are no
Presale Report — 2014BBonds -1531- July 22, 2014
City of Mound, ]Minnesota Page 2
other refunding opportunities at
We will continue to monitor the market and the call dates for the City's
outstanding debt and will alert you to any future refunding opportunities.
Continuing Disclosure: Because the City has more than $10,000,000 in outstanding debt (including
this issue) and this issue is over $1,000,000, the City will be agreeing to
provide certain updated Annual Financial Information and its Audited
Financial Statement annually as well as providing notices of the occurrence of
certain "material events" to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the
"MSRB), as required by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). The City is already obligated to provide such reports for its existing
bonds, and has contracted with Ehlers to prepare and file the reports.
Arbitrage Monitoring: Because the Bonds are tax- exempt securities /tax credit securities, the City
must ensure compliance with certain Internal Revenue Service (IRS) rules
throughout the life of the issue. These rules apply to all gross proceeds of the
issue, including initial bond proceeds and investment earnings in construction,
escrow, debt service, and any reserve funds. How issuers spend bond
proceeds and how they track interest earnings on funds (arbitrage /yield
restriction compliance) are common subjects of IRS inquiries. Your specific
responsibilities will be detailed in the Nonarbitrage Certificate prepared by
your Bond Attorney and provided at closing. We recommend that you
regularly monitor compliance with these rules and /or retain the services of a
qualified firm to assist you.
Risk Factors: Special Assessments: We have not assumed any pre -paid special assessments
and we have assumed that assessments will be levied as projected. If the City
receives a significant amount of pre -paid assessments, it may need to increase
the levy portion of the debt service to make up for lower interest earnings than
the expected assessment interest rate.
Utility Revenue: The City expects to pay the Bonds with utility funds. If
utility revenue is inadequate, the City will need to increase utility rates to make
the scheduled payments, which may require the City to levy taxes to pay debt
service on in interim basis.
Current Refunding: The Bonds are being issued for the purpose of current
refunding prior City debt obligations. Those prior debt obligations are
"callable" now and can therefore be paid off within 90 days or less. The new
Bonds will not be pre - payable until February 1, 2021 This refunding is being
undertaken based in part on an assumption that the City does not expect to
have future revenues to pay off this debt and that market conditions warrant
the refinancing at this time.
This presale report summarizes our understanding of the City's objectives for the structure and terms of this
financing as of this date. As additional facts become known or capital markets conditions change, we may need
to modify the structure and/or terms of this financing to achieve results consistent with the City's objectives.
Presale Report — 2O14BBonds -1532- July 22, 2014
City of Mound, Minnesota Page 3
Proposed Debt Issuance Schedule
Pre -Sale Review by City Council
July 22, 2014 —
Jason Aarsvold
Distribute Official Statement:
Week of August 11, 2014
(651) 697 -8566
g Agency:
Week of August 18`h
to Award Sale of the Bonds:
7CIosing
August 26, 2014
e:
September ] 8, 2014
Redemption Date for 2005A Bon ds
October 1, 2014
Redemption Date for 2005B Bonds
October 1, 2014
Attachments
Sources and Uses of Funds
Proposed Debt Service Schedule
Refunding Savings Analysis
Resolution Authorizing Ehlers to Proceed With Bond Sale
Ehlers Contacts
Financial Advisors: Stacie Kvilvang
(651) 697 -8506
Jason Aarsvold
(651) 697 -8512
Disclosure Coordinator: Jen Chapman
(651) 697 -8566
Financial Analyst: Alicia Gage
(651) 697 -8551
The Official Statement for this financing will be mailed to the City Council at their home address or e- mailed for
review prior to the sale date.
Presale Report — 2014BBonds -1533- July 22, 2014
City of Mound, Minnesota Page 4
Resolution No.
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
Resolution Providing for the Sale of
$3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota has heretofore determined that it is
necessary and expedient to issue the City's $3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series
2014B (the "Bonds "), to finance the current refunding of the 2005A and 2005B Bonds in the City;
and
B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "), as its
independent financial advisor for the Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. Authorization; Findings. The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale
of the Bonds.
2. Meeting' Proposal Openin . The City Council shall meet at 7:00 p.m. on August 26, 2014, for the
purpose of considering sealed proposals for and awarding the sale of the Bonds.
3. Official Statement. In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby
authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the
Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by City Council Member
and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
following City Council M_ embers voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Dated this 22nd day of July, 2014.
-1534-
City Clerk
City of Mound, Minnesota
$3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 20148
Issue Summary - Current Ref 05A & 05B
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Total Issue Sources And Uses
Dated 09118/20141 Delivered 09M812014
CR 2005A CR 2005B GO
GO Impry Wtr Rev Issue
Bonds Bonds Summary
Sources Of Funds
Par Amount of Bonds $970,070.00 $2.350,000.00 53,32[1,000 .00
Total Sources 5970,000.00 82,350,000,00 33,320,000.00
Uses Of Funds
Total Undewitets Discount (2.000 /)
Costs aflssuance 9,05223 .
Deposit to Current Refundine Fund _ _ _ 946.435 42 _
Rounding Amount 4,807.35
Total Uses $970,000.00
Series 2014 B GO Refunding l Issue Summary 1 7/1512014 1 9,03 AM
EHLERS -1535 -
21,942.77 31000.00
2.306,155 42 3.2521590. R4
(1598.19) 720916
52,350,000.00 S3,320,0110.00
City of Mound, Minnesota
$3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 20148
Issue Summary - Current Ref 05A & 05B
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +I
Fiscal Total
09/18/2014
02/01/2015
-
285,00000
'
0550%
-
21,57279
-
306,572,79
306,572.79
08/01/2015
-
-
28,412 50
28,412 50
02/01/2016
320,00000
0.700%
28,412.50
348,412.50
376,82500
08/0_1/2016
-
-
27,29250
27292.50
02/01/2017
320,000 00
1,000%
27,292.50
347,292 50
374,585 00
-
25,69250
25,69250
-
08/01/2017
0270112018
-
325,000 00
1 25096
25,692 50
350,692 50
376,385 00
08/0112018
-
-
23,661 25
23,661.25
-
02/01/2019
330.000 00
1.550%
2166125
_ _ 353,661 25
_ _ _ 377.322 50
08/01/2019
-
21,103.75
21,10375
-
02/01/2020
340,00000
1850%
21,10375
361,10375
382,207 50
08/0112020
-
-
17,958 75
17,95875
-
02/01/2021
340,000.00
2.150%
17,958.75
357,95875
375,91750
08101/2021
-
-
14,303.75
14,30375
02/01/2022
200,000.00
2350%
14,30375
214,303,75
228,607.50
08/01/2022
-
-
11,95375
31,953.75
-
02/03/2023
205,000 00
2 600%
11,953 75
216,953 75
228,907.50
08/01/2023
-
-
9,28875
9,28875
-
02/01/2024
210,000.00
2700%
_.
9,28875 _
_2.19,288 75 _.
228,577 50
08/01/2024
-
6,453.75
6,45375
02101/2025
220,000.00
2 850%
6,453 75
226,453 75
232,907.50
08/01/2025
-
3,318 75
3,318 75
-
02/0112026
225,000 00
2950%
3,31875
228,318 75
231,637.50
Total
83,320,000.00
$400,452.79
53,720,452.79
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Bel Iars _ _ $17,826.56
5.369 Years
AvmeLife __ _. —. - . —.____ . —_ ..._..._._
Aeeaee Coupon 22463834%
Net Interest Cost (NIC) 2,4326224 �°
_- - -___ — '-.... _ 2 4293193 °,b
True Interest CostifK'7 _ _ - -. -- .- -- - - - - - - ---
Bond Yield for Arlatrage Purposes -� 2,2265636%
All Inclusive Cost (AIC) _ 2 6214713 °%
IRS
Maturity
Se6as20146GOR.1uId1r9 I Issue Summary 1 7/15/2014 1 9;03AM
EHLERS
1 IADI!IS IN MITI 11 I'll "E
-1536-
5 369 Years
City of [Mound, Minnesota
$3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
Issue Summary - Current Ref 05A & 05B
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Net Debt Service Schedule
Fiscal
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Net New D/S Total
09/1812014
-
-
-
(3,209.16)
-
02/01/2015
285 000.00
0.550%
21 572.79
306,572.79
306,572.79
303,363 63
08/01/2015
-
-
28,41150
28,412.50
28,412.50
-
02/01/2016
320,00000
0.700%
28,412 50
348 412.50
348,412.50
376,825.00
08/01/2016
-
-_
2720
27,29250
27,292.50
-
02/01 /2017
320,000 00
1,000%
27,292 50
347,292 50
347,291-50
374,585 00
08/01/2017
-
-
25,692.50
25,69250
25,692 50
-
02101/2018
325,000 00
1250%
25,692 50
350,692.50
350,692 50
376,385.00
08/0112018
-
-
23,661 25
23,661.25
23,66] 25
-
02/01/2019
330 000 00
1.550%
23,661.25
.�
353,661.25
353,661 25
377,322.50
1311___
_. 1333. 3111.
08/01/2019
_ __.
1113.
-
21,10375
21,10375
21,103.75
-
02/01/2020
340,00000
1,850%
21,103,75
361,103.75
361,103.75
382,207 50
08/01/2020
-
-
17,9505
17,95875
17,95875
-
02/01/2021
340,00000
2150%
17,958,75
357958.75
357,95875
375,917.50
08/01/2021
-
-
14,303.75
— ._1303__.
14.303.75
3313.
14,303.75
-
_._
02/01/2022
200,000.00
3111
2350%
1 §,303,75
214,303.75
214,30375
228,60750
08/01/2022
-
-
11,95375
11,95375
11,953.75
-
02/01/2023
205,00000
2600%
11,953.75
216,95375
216,95375
228,907.50
08/01/2023
-
-
9,288.75
9,288.75
9,288.75
-
02/01/2024
210.000 00
2700%
9,288.75
2.19288.75
219.288.75
228.577.50
08/01/2024
-
-
6,453 75
6,453.75
6,453 75
-
02/0112025
2201000,00
_^ 850%
6,453.75
226,453.75
226,453.75
232,907 50
08/01/2025
-
-
3,318.75
3,318 75
3,318.75
-
02/01/2026
225,000.00
2950%
3,318.75
228,31875
228,318.75
231,637.50
Total
53,320,000.00
-
S400,452.79
53,720,452.79
53,717,243.63
-
Series 2014B GO Relu,Oing I lm Summary [7!15!201419:03 AM
EHLERS
isr.t�E H.`.I JI9 u: Hi,LALf'. -1537—
City of Mound, Minnesota
$3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
Issue Summary - Current Ref 05A & 056
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Comparison
Date
Total P +I
Net New D/S
Old Net D/S
Savings
02/01/2019
306,572.79
303,36163
337,772.50
34,408.87
27,920.00
02/01/2016
376,825.00
376,825,00
404,745.00
403,54500
28,960.00
02/01/2017
374,585.00
374 585.00
376,385.00
406,78000
30,39500
02101/2018
376,38500
377,322 50
377,322.50
404.275 00
26.952.50
02/01/2019 -
- -
- 382,20N7.57.5 0
_ -- 382,207,50
406,360.00
24,15250
02/01/2020
375,917.50
375,917.50
402,335 00
26,417.50
02/01/2021
228,60750
228,607.50
247,88500
19277.50
02/01/2022
229,907 50
228,907,50
249,385 00
20,477 50
02/01/2023
02/01/2024
228,577.50
228577.50
250,25000
21,672.50
02/01/2025
232,907.50
232,90750
250,680 00
250,56000
17,M 50
18,92250
mmi nn9A
23163250
231,637.50
-
Total 53,720,452.79 $3,717,243.63
54,014,572.50 52Y7,3ztl.n7
PV Anal sis Summary (Net to Net)
264,127.71
Gross PV Debt Scrvice Savings _.c._:, =_.. ____— .— ._______
_.__. ___.___— ____ —__ —.
Net PV CashflOW Savings (a) 2 227 94VBond Yield)._..
264'127.71
3 209.16
Contingency or Rounding Amount
_.. - - -_
$267,336.87
Net Present Value Benefit - - --
-� _ -
-- - - ---- " —" - "' - -" '""
Nat PV Benefit /S3 5n9 420 15 PV Ref unded Debt Service
7.490%
..___. .. _._._ -___ _ —_ %
8.277%
Net PV Benefit / $3-230,000 Refunded Principal _.
— - -- -- - -- --
8052%
Net PV Benefit / $3_320000 Refunding Principal __.
__..__..__..__.._ _..,_..
Refunding Bond Information
9/18/2014
Refunding Dated Data _._.._
9/18/2014
Refund ing Del ivey Date _ ._. _____... .. __ _
_._.. - .. _ __- __._..
s >nes. 20145 GO Rufundn9 I Issue Summary 1 7/1512014 1 9:03 AM
EHLERS t,.�N�', :; �: ' ,,,,,:t
-1538-
City of Mound, Minnesota
$3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
Issue Summary - Current Ref 05A & 05B
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Current Refunding Escrow
Date Rate
Receipts
Disbursements Cash Balance
09/19 /2014 -
3,252,590.84
- 3.252,590 84
10101/2014 -
-
3,252,590.84 -
Total
S3,252,590.84
53,252,590.84 -
Investment Parameters
Investment Model rpv, GIC, or Securities] _. _ __ _ _ Securities
Default investmentvield target Unrestricted
Cash Deposit ._._. - -.
Total Cost of Investments,
Target Cost of Investments at bond yield
_.,._. —_ ,.1111'
Act ualpositiv -or (negative) arbnrn &e
Yield to Recoint
Yield for fvbilrage Purposes _ __ ___
State and Local Covemmem Series (SLGS) rates for_
Series 20148 GO Returning I issue Summary 1 7/15/2014 1 9:03 AM
3,252 590.84
1590_._
53252.590.84
._.�_. $3,249,991.13
_ _ 1111 -_ 1111.111.1
(2,599.71)
--- _ ---- - --
2 2265636%
5/21/2014
EHLERS -1539 -
lL
City of Mound, Minnesota
$3,320,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 20148
Issue Summary - Current Ref 05A & 05B
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Detail Costs Of Issuance
Dated 0911.812014 1 Delivered 09/18/2014
COSTS OF ISSUANCE DETAIL
Series 2014B GO Refunding I Issue Summary 1 7/1512014 1 9:03 AM
EHLERS -1540 -
1tYJM1FS It, I' !Wt iCI NRlQ:L
$n.000.00
Financial Advisor(L61en &Associates)
- - - -. — ..—
._
$9.000.00
Bond Counsel (13npgs and Morgan) _ .._ -
_
-- -.. - -- -- - -- — —
$4.00000
Rating Agency � F . -.
$1000.00
miscellaneous _ .. .___...
__.._ _.... __.i.
$31.000.00
TOTAL
Series 2014B GO Refunding I Issue Summary 1 7/1512014 1 9:03 AM
EHLERS -1540 -
1tYJM1FS It, I' !Wt iCI NRlQ:L
City of (Mound, Minnesota
$970,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
CR 2005A GO Impry Bonds
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Total P +I Fiscal Total
09/18/2014
-
-
-
-
02/01/2015
125,000.00
0.550%
4,705.80
129,705.80
129,705.80
08/01/2015
-
-
6,025.00
6,025.00
-
02/01/2016
140,000 00
0.700%
6,025.00
146,025.00
152 050.00
08101/2016
-
5.53500
5.535 00
-
____ 20 _
02/01/17
135,000.00
1.000/
5,53500
140,535.00
146,070,00
08/01/2017
-
-
4,860.00
4,86000
-
02/01 /2018
140,000.00
1250%
4,86000
144,86000
149,72000
08/01/2018
-
-
3,985.00
3,98500
-
02/01/2019
140.00000
1550%
3.98500
14.3,98500
147,970.00
08/016019
-
-
2,90000
2,900.00
-
02/01/2020
145,000 00
1850%
2,90000
147,900 00
150,800.00
08i01/2020
-
-
1,558.75
1,558.75
-
02/01/2021
145,00000
2150%
1,55875
146,558.75
148,11750
Total $970,000.00
554,433.30 $1,024,433.30
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars
_ _,. _ _ _._ $3,34336
_
Average Life
3447 Years
Average Coupon _
16281011%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)
1 9182283%
Two Interest Cost (TIC)
19258233%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Pumoses
2 2265636%
All Inclusive Cost (A1C)
22133467%
8038
Net Interest Cost
Weighted Average Maturity.
Series20146G0Refu,dinp I CR2005AGOhPIB -ds 1 71158014 1 9;03AM
EHLERS -1541 -
city of Mound, Minnesota
$970,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
CR 2005A GO Impry Bonds
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Net Debt Service Schedule
nnuo nn P,( —Knn I CR 2005A GO IMON BOOds 1 71152014 1 9:03 AM
EHLERS -1542-
1I'X@ n.% IN 1 "1 11'; HI :;,`,:a
Fiscal
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +I
Net New D/S
Total
-
-
(4,807 35)
-
09/18/2014
02/01/2015
-
12500000
0550%
4,705.80
129,70580
129,705.80
124,898.45
U8/01/2015
-
-
6,02500
6,02500
6,02500
-
02/01/2016
140,000 00
0.700%
6,025.00
146,025 00
146,025.00
152,050.00
08101/2016
5,53500
5,535 00
5,535.00
-
/20
02/0717
]35,00000
1000%
5535.00
140,53500
140,53500
1
08/01/2017
-
-
4,86000
4,860,00
4,860.00
-
02/01/2018
140,000 00
1250%
4,86000
144,860.00
144,860,00
149,720.00
08/01/2018
-
-
3,99500
3,985.00
3,985 00
143,985.00
-
147;970.00
02/01/2019
140.00000
1550% _
_ 3.98500_ _
_,__143,985.00
2,90000
_ _.
2,900,00
08/01/2019
145,000.00
1.850%
2,900.00
2,900.00
147,90000
147,90000
150,800.00
02101/2020
1,55875
1,558 75
1,558.75
-
08101/2020
02/01/2021
145,00000
2,150%
1,558.75
146,55875
146,558.75
148,11750
Total
5970,000.00
$54,433.30
51,024,433.30
51,074,625.95
-
nnuo nn P,( —Knn I CR 2005A GO IMON BOOds 1 71152014 1 9:03 AM
EHLERS -1542-
1I'X@ n.% IN 1 "1 11'; HI :;,`,:a
City of Mound, Minnesota
$970,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
CR 2005A GO Impry Bonds
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Comparison
Date Total P +I Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings
02/01/2015
129,705.80
124,898.45
139,306.25
14,407.80
02/01/2016
152,05000
152,050.00
158,812.50
6,762.50
02/01/2017
146,070.00
146,07000
153,812.50
7,742.50
02/01/2018
149,720,00
149,720 00
158,812 50
9,092 50
02/01/2019
147970.00
147,97000
158,27750
1030750
02/01/2020
150,800.00
150,800 00
157,537.50
6,73750
02/01/2021
148,117.50
148,11750
156,37500
8,25750
Total $1,024,433.30 $1,019,625.95 $1,082,933.75 $63,307.80
PV Analysis Summary (Net to Nett
Gross PV Debt Service Savings.. .. _. 54,76399
Net PV Cashflow Savings n 2227 %(Bond Yield)._ 54.76399
Contiogencv or Rounding Amount _ 4,80735
Net Present Value Benefit $59,571.34
Net PV Benefit / $1.005,593 51 PV Refunded Debt Service _ _ _ 5.924%
Net PV Benefit / $940,000 Refunded Principal _. _ 6.337%
Net PV Benefit/ $9700001 vIundmP Principal _ 6.141%
Refunding Bond Information
Refunding Dated Date
Refunding De (very Date
Boner 20145 GO Refunding CR 2005A GO ImoN Bonds 1 711512014 1 9:03 AM
EHLERS -1543 -
9/18/2014
9/1812014
City of Mound, Minnesota
$970,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds,
Series 20148
CR 2005A GO Impry Bonds
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Current Refunding Escrow
Cash
Date Rate Receipts
Disbursements Balance
09118/2014 - 946,435.42
- 946,435.42
-
946,435.42
10/01/2014 -
Total - $946,435.42
$946,435.42 -
Investment Parameters
Llvestment Model (PV, GIC, or Securities] - - - - - - - - - -- - - --
Securities
_ .. - - - -- Unrestricted
Default invesnentyield target
Cash Deposit
Total Costoflnvestments - ___ -- .. - - -- - - - --
Target Cost of Investments at bond yield,
Actual_ positive or (nrfpuvc)arbttrnge _ ___,_. —
Yield to Receipt
__.
Yield for Arbitrage Purposes
Senor 20146 GO Refunding I CR 2005A GO Impry Bonds 1 715/2014 1 903 AM
EHLERS -1544-
,i"D ,i : W PUri.l; I'I b t,4"I
946A35.42
-„
$946,43542
$945,678.96
(756.46)
22265636%
City of Mound, MN
$1,765,000 GO Improvement Bonds, Series 2005A
Total Refunded Debt Service
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +1
Fiscal Total
02/01/2015
120,000,00
4000%
19,30625
139,30625
139,30625
08/01/2015
-
-
16,906,25
16,906.25
-
02/01/2016
125,000.00
4.000%
16,906.25
141,90625
158,812.50
08101/2016
-
-
14,40625
14,406.25
-
02/01/2017
12500000
.,4000%__,,._,_____14,406.25_._
_
139,406,25
153,812,50
08/01/2017
-..
-
11,90625
11,906.25
-
02/01/2018
135,00000
4.100%
11,90625
146,90625
158,81250
08/01/2018
-
-
9,138.75
9,138.75
-
02/01/2019
140,000.00
4.100%
9,138,75
149,13875
158,27750
08/01/2019
-
6.268 75
6 268 75
-
02/01/2(120
145,000 00
-
4.250%
6,268.75
151,268.75
157,537.50
08/01/2020
-
-
3,187 50
3,18750
-
02/01/2021
150,000.00
4.250%
3,187.50
153,187.50
156,37500
Total
$940,000.00
-
5142,933.75
$1,082,933.75
-
Yield Statistics
Base date for Avg Life&: Avg Coupon Calculation
Average Life
Average Coupon
Wcighted Average MaWtv(ParBasis)_ ------
Refunding Bond Information
Refunding Dated Date
Refunding DeUvery Date _._ ...
2005A CO impry eds CR RI I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 711512014 1 9:03 AM
EHLERS -1545 -
II 16P1'bL' „I' Pof
9/18/2014
3 524 Years
4 1630769%
3.524 Years
9/182014
9/18/2D14
City of Mound, MN
$1,765,000 GO Improvement Bonds, Series 2005A
Debt Service To Maturity And To Call
Yield Statistics
Refunded
Refunded
9/182014
30.30_...__
As er u;c Life —
3 524 Years
3030 _. 30.69 .
— _
.3030.. .3030___ _. _
Refunded
Date
Bonds
Interest
D/S To Call
Principal
Coupon
Interest
D/S
09/18/2014
-
.,_ 3030. _
Refund,uf Delivery Date _ 30.------
10101/2014
940,00000
6,43542
94643542
02/01/2015
-
-
-
MAO 00
4000%
19,30625
139,306.25
-
-
16,90625
16,906.25
08/01/2015
-
-
-
-
12500000
4.000%
16.90625
141,906.25
_02/01/2016
_
_. -
... _. -
.3030_..
-
-
_
-
_ ... 3030..
74,40625
3030__ -30.30
14,406.25
08l01/2016
-
-
125,00000
4.000%
14,406.25
139,40625
02/01/2017
-
-
-
-
-
11,90625
11,90625
08/01/2017
-
-
-
-
135,000.00
4.100%
11,90625
146,90625
02/01/2018
-
-
-
-
-
9,13875
9,13875
O8I01 /2018
_.3030_ -_
3030 -
-
_.
.3030__ 3030
-
_... _... r__ 30.30...
140000.00
_ _ 3030
4100%
_ _ 3030.__
9,13975
— .3030...
149,138.75
02/01/2019
-
-
-
-
-
6,268 75
6,268.75
08/012019
-
-
-
145,00000
4,250%
6,2605
151,26875
02/01/2020
-
-
-
-
3,187 50
3,187.50
08/01/2020
-
-
150,000.00
4.250%
3,18750
153,18750
02/01/2021
-
-
.3030.___..
30.....30._
Total
$940,000.00
$6,435.42
$946,435.42
$940,000.00
-
$142,933.75
$1,082,933.75
Yield Statistics
Base date thr Avg Life & Ave Coupon Calculation
9/182014
30.30_...__
As er u;c Life —
3 524 Years
3030 _. 30.69 .
— _
.3030.. .3030___ _. _
4.1630769%
Averaee Coupon ._ 30.30__ 30.30___. — _.
— _.3030__ 3030. _._ 30_30
3.524 Years
Weighted Averaee Maturitv(Par Basis) .
Refunding Bondinformation
Refunding Dated Date _ . 3030.._ 3030. _..�...
9/18/2014
3030— _ —. 3030_. _. 3030__
.,_ 3030. _
Refund,uf Delivery Date _ 30.------
2005A GO MPv Bds CR 01 1 SINGE PURPOSE 1 711512014 1 9:03 AM
EHLERS -1546 -
City of Mound, Minnesota
$2,350,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
CR 2005B GO Wtr Rev Bonds
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Schedule
Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P +I Fiscal Total
09/18/2014
-
-
-
-
-
02/01/2015
160,000.00
0550%
16,86699
176,866.99
176,86699
08/01/2015
-
-
22,38750
22,387.50
-
02/0112016
180,000 00
0.700%
22,387 50
202,387.50
224,775 00
08/01/2016
-
-
21,757.50
21,757,50
-
02/01/2017
165,000.00
1000/
21,757.50
206,75750
228,51500
08/01/2017
-
-
20,832.50
20,832.50
-
02/01/2018
185 000.00
1250%
20,832 50
205,83150
226,665.00
08/01/2018
-
-
19,676.25
19,676.25
02/01/2019
190.000 00
1550%
(8676 25
209.676 25
22935250
08/012019
-
-
18,203 75
18,203 75
02/01/2020
195,000.00
1850%
18,203 75
213203.75
231,407.50
08/01/2020
-
-
16,40000
16,400.00
-
02/01/2021
195,00000
2150%
16,40000
211,40000
227,800.00
08/01/2021
- --
14,303 75
14,303 75
-
02/01/2022
200,000.00
2.350/
14,303.75
214,30375
228,607.50
08/01/2022
-
-
11,953 75
11,953 75
-
02/01/2023
205,000 00
2.600%
11,953 75
216,953 75
228,907 50
08/01/2023
-
-
9,28875
9,28875
-
ozrov2oz4
zlo.00000
v °
7oor°
�. __.
�� -�
_... 75
-
219,28875
._.__- _..
228,577.50
... _..__..
08/01/207,4
61453-7-5
6,453.75
-
02/01/2025
220,000.00
2 85000/
6,453 75
226,453 75
232,907.50
08/01/2025
-
-
3,318 75
3,318 75
-
02/01/2026
225,000.00
2.950%
3,31875
228,318.75
231,637.50
Total
82,350,000.00
$346,019.49
$2,696,019.49
Yield Statistics
Bond Year Dollars
$14.483.19
Average Life
6 163 Years
Average Coupon
2389,1103%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)
25513673%
True interest Cost ( fIC)
2.5498311%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Pumoses
_ 2 2265636%
All Inclusive Cost (A1C)_.
27194299%
IRS Form
ncuesr �,osi
hied Average Maturity
Series 2014B GO Refunding I OR 20058 GOWIr Rev Bonds 1 71152014 1 9 :03AM
" :f C -1547-
!1, t I f N.,Yp
City of Mound, Minnesota
$2,350,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
CR 2005B GO WIT Rev Bonds
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Net Debt Service Schedule
Fiscal
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +I
Net New D/S
Total
-
-
1,598 19
-
09/18/2014
02/01 /2015
-
160,000.00
-
0550%
16,866.99
176,86699
176,866.99
178,465.18
08/01/2015
-
-
22,38750
22,387.50
22,387.50
-
02/0172016
180,00000
0700%
22,38750
202,387,50
202,38750
224,775.00
08/01/2016
-
-
21,75750
21757.50
2175750
:.
02/0W017
185,00() 00
_.
1000 %
21,757.50
206,757.50
206757.50
228,515.00
08/01/2017
-
-
20,832.50
20,832.50
20,83250
-
02/01/2018
185,00000
1250%
20,832.50
205,832.50
205,832,50
226,665.00
08/01/2018
-
-
19,67625
19676.25
19,676.25
-
02/01/2019
190,000.00
1550%
19,676.25 __
_ 209,676.25_
209,676.25
_ 229.35250.
_
- -� -
- .___......
-
_. _._.
'
18,203 75
18,203.75
18,203.75
-
02/01/2019
02/01/2020
195,000.00
1850%
18,20375
213,20375
2)3,203 75
231,407.50
08/01/2020
-
16,400,00
16,400.00
16,40000
-
02/01/2021
195,00000
2150%
16,40000
211,40000
211400.00
227,80000
08/0112021
-
-
_ 14,303.75
14,303 751
_ 14,30375 _
_ -
02/01/2022
'00,00000
_
2350%
14,303.75
214,303 75
214,303 75
228,607.50
08/01/2022
-
-
11,953.75
11,953.75
11,95375
-
02/01/2023
205,00090
2.600%
11,953.75
216,953 75
216,953.75
228,907 50
08/01/2023
-
-
9,288.75
9,288.75
9,28875
-
02f01/2024
210000.00
2,700%
219.288.75
21'128875
228,57750
08/01/2024
-
-
6,453 75
6,45375
6,453 75
-
02/01/2025
220,000 00
2.850%
6,453 75
226,453.75
226,453 75
232,907 50
08/01/2025
-
-
3,318.75
3,31875
3,318 75
-
rnro111mA
225000.00
2,950%
3,31875
228,318.75
228,318.75
231,63750
Total 82,350,000.00 - S�ab,utxay ac,oro,viv.•+� e•- rv�,••. •• -�
C- iuo7nn4BGORefundlno I CR20058GOWVRev BOMB 1 7/15/2014 1 9o3AM
EHLERS -1548 -
City of Mound, Minnesota
$2,350,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
CR 2005B GO Wtr Rev Bonds
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Debt Service Comparison
Date Total P +1 Net New D/S Old Net D!S Savings
02101/2015
176,866.99
178,465.18
198,466
25
20,001 07
02/01/2016
224,775.00
224,775.00
245,932
50
21,157 50
02/01/2017
228,515.00
228,515.00
249,732.50
21,21750
02/01/2018
226,66500
226665.00
247,967.50
21,30250
02/01/2019
229.352.50 _._
229,35250
245,99750
16.645.00
02/01/2020
231,40750
231,40750
248,82250
17,4]500
02/01/2021
227,800 00
227,800
00
245,960.00
18,160.00
02/01/2022
228,607 50
228,607.50
247,885
00
19,27750
02/012023
228,907.50
228,907.50
249,385
00
20,477,50
02/01/2024
228,577.50
228.577
50
250,250,00
_ 21,672.50
02/012025
232,907.50
232,907
50
250,680.00
17,772.50
02/012026
231,637 50
231,637
50
250,560
00
18,922 50
Total
$2,696,019.49
$2,697,617.68
$2,931,638.75
$234,021.07
PV Analysts Summary (Net to Net)
Gross PV Debt Service Sayings
Net PV Cashflovv Savings fa) 2.227 ;,(Brn d Yield)
ConiinEency or Roundin f Amount
Net Present Value Benefit
Net PV Benefit / $2,563.826.65 PV Refunded Debt Service
NatPV9eoeJt /$2290,MORefunded Princupal _
Net PVBenefit /$2,350,000 Refunding PrmmpaL._,
Refunding Bond Information
___ 208.16954
208,169 54
(1,589.07)
$20658047
8 058%
9.021%
Refunding Dated Date ._. _ .__ .. _. _ 9/18/2014
Refunding Delrvery Date _ _ 9/182014
Series 20148 GO Refunding I CR 20058 GO WV Rev Bands 1 711512014 1 9:03 AM
EHLERS -1549 -
City of Mound, Minnesota
$2,350,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2014B
CR 2005B GO Wtr Rev Bonds
Assumes Current Market BQ AA Rates plus 25bps
Current Refunding Escrow
Date Rate
Receipts Disbursements Cash Balance
09/18/2014
2,306,155.42 2,306,15542
10/01/2014
2,306,155.42
Total
$2,306,155.42 $2,306,155.42
Investment Parameters
l""SmIent: Model (PV. GIC. or Securities) - Securities -
ted
Default investment weld target Unrestricted
Yield to Receipt 22265636°
1 1515
Yield for Arbinap Purposes
stsn.o2014BGOR&.Idu9 I CR2005BG0Wt1Rov Bonds 1 7115/2014 1 9!03AM
EHLERS
-1550-
1 F1,0' i:3 I. Vel jI. 1 It" .id,
2306,155 42
Cash Deposit..__
6150.__ 1515 6150 -1515
$2306.15542
Total CostOf lolvestmIcDos
- ,
Tarnet Cost of bnveencents at bond vidd
17
Yield to Receipt 22265636°
1 1515
Yield for Arbinap Purposes
stsn.o2014BGOR&.Idu9 I CR2005BG0Wt1Rov Bonds 1 7115/2014 1 9!03AM
EHLERS
-1550-
1 F1,0' i:3 I. Vel jI. 1 It" .id,
City of (bound, MN
$3,325,000 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2005B
Total Refunded Debt Service
Date Principal Coupon _ _ Interest Total P +1 Fiscal Total
02/0112015
150,000 00
4000%
48,466 25
198,466 25
198,466.25
08/01/2015
-
-
45,46625
45,46625
-
02/01/2016
155,00000
4000%
45,466 25
200,466 25
245,932.50
08/01/2016
-
-
42,366.25
42,366 25
-
02/01/2017
165,00000
4.100'A
_
_ 4236625
207,36625
249732.50
0017_
8/01/2
-
38,983.75
38,98375
-
02/0112018
170,000.00
4100%
38,983,75
208,983,75
247,967.50
08/01/2018
-
-
35,498.75
35,498.75
-
02/01/2019
175,000 00
4 100%
35 498,75
210,498 75
245,997.50
08/01/2019
-
-
3191125
31,91125
02/01/2020
185,000.00
4250%
31,911 25
216911 , 25
248 822 50
08/01/2020
-
-
27,98000
27980.00
-
02/01/'2021
190,00000
4.250%
27,98000
217,98000
245,96000
08/01/2021
-
-
23,94250
23,94250
-
02/01/2022
200000.00
4250%
23,942.50
223,94250 _.,
247,885 00
08/01/2022
--
-
19,692.50
19,692,50
-
02/01/2023
210,000 00
4.350°/
19,692 50
229,692 50
249,385.00
08/01/2023
-
15,125.00
15,125 00
-
02/01/2024
220,000 00
4350%
15,125 00
235,125 00
250,250.00
08/01/2024
-
__. 10.34000
10,340.00
-
02/01/2025
230,000 00
4400%
10,340.00
240,340.00
250,680 00
08/01/2025
-
-
5,280.00
5,28000
-
02/01/2026
240,000 00
4 400%
5,280.00
245,280.00
250,560 00
Total
$2.290,000.00
$641,638.75
52,931,638.75
-
Yield Statistics
Base date for Avg Life . &Avg Coupon Calculation 9/182014
_Average L f
Average Coupon e 37 ears
Ave __.. _ �— �..�� ��... � 43063294%
Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) 6 378 Years
Refunding Bond Information
Refunding Dated Date .__..
Refunding Delivery Date__
20056 GO We Rev Eds CR f I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 7/15/2014 1 9:03 AM
EHLERS
-1551-
9/18/2014
9/18/2014
$3,325,000 G.O. Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2005B
nPht Service To Maturity And To Call
Yield Statistics
Base date ror Ava Life Re Ave Coupon_ Calculation
9/18/2014
6378 Years
Average Life
Average Coupon _ -_ _ _.... _.__..___ r_.
- - -- - - -- � _ -- 6378 Years
Weighted Averae Maturity (FarBas,$) - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - ---
Refunding Bond Information
9/1 M014
Refunding Dated Date _ _ _. - - --- -- -- ""- -- - -- 1- -
-- � - - 9/I 8/2014
Refunding Delivery Date - _ _ -... _ _ ._. _._
rnw „.—Rd, rnf I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 7/1512014 1 9,03 AM
EHLERS
-1552 -
Refunded
Refunded Refunded
D/S
Date
Bonds Interest D!S To Call
Principal
Coupon
Interest
09/18/2014
- -
-
10/01/2014
2,290,00000 16,155.42 2,306,15542
1500.00
00-
4000%
-
48,466.25
198,466.25
02/01/2015
- -
45,46625
45,46625
08/01/2015
- '
-
155,000,00
4000%
45,46625
200.46625
02/11/2016 --
-
-- - - -- - - --- _._- ---
-
_ -- -
42,366.25
_, .
42,366.25
08/01/2016
-
16500000
4.100%
42,366.25
207,36625
02/01/2017
.
-
-
38,98375
38,983.75
08/01/2017
- '
-
170,00000
4100 °r6
38,98375
208,983.75
02/01/2018
- -
-
-
35,498.75
35498.75
08/01/2018
_ - -
-
175,000.00
4.100%
35,498.75
210,498.75
02/01/2019
- -
_
-
31,911.25
31,911.25
08/01/2019
_
"
185,00000
4.250%
31,911.25
216,91 L25
02/01/2020
- -
-
27,9800
27,980.00
08/01/2020
- '
190000.00....
4250%,
27,980.00
217:98(1.00
02/01/2021
- - - -- --
.._
.
23,942.50
23,942.50
08/01/2021
200,000,00
4.250':6
23,942.50
223,942.50
02/01/2022
-
-
19,692.50
19,692.50
08/01/2022
-
210,00000
210,00000
4.350%
19,692.50
229,69250
1 5,125.00
15.125.00
08/01/2023
- _ -... _ '__._
-
220,000.00
4350%
_..
15,125.00
235,125.00
02/01/2024
- -
-
10,340,00
10,340.00
08/01/2024
_
230,00000
4400%
10,340.00
240,34000
02/01/2025
- _
-
-
5,280.00
5,280.00
08/01/2025
'
-
2- 4- 0,- 00000
4400 %_
5.280_
.2 -- ---- .00
02/01/20. 26
- -
--
I Total
$2,290,000.00 $16,155.42 52,306,155.42
52,290,000.00
-
8641,638.75
$2,931,638.75
Yield Statistics
Base date ror Ava Life Re Ave Coupon_ Calculation
9/18/2014
6378 Years
Average Life
Average Coupon _ -_ _ _.... _.__..___ r_.
- - -- - - -- � _ -- 6378 Years
Weighted Averae Maturity (FarBas,$) - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - ---
Refunding Bond Information
9/1 M014
Refunding Dated Date _ _ _. - - --- -- -- ""- -- - -- 1- -
-- � - - 9/I 8/2014
Refunding Delivery Date - _ _ -... _ _ ._. _._
rnw „.—Rd, rnf I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 7/1512014 1 9,03 AM
EHLERS
-1552 -
7 -9 -2014
City of Mound
Public Gathering Permit Application
Re: Fee Appeal
We ask that the completed application for 4th Annual Dog Days Westonka, a Westonka
Community & Commerce event, be on the 'Regular Agenda' and not the 'Consent
Agenda' for the city council meeting on July 22nd. We ask to appeal a partial fee,
waiving half of the $300 fee, to $150, as previously discussed. Enclosed is a check for
the full amount as requested to appear on the council agenda.
This event brings an attendance of approx. 600 pet owners/families to Auditors Road for
the time of 9 -2 on August 16th. Many of our attendees enjoy the destination event and
spend time /money at other establishments in Mound. The event donates all proceeds
back to WeCan pet fund, City Projects like the pet waste station on the Andrew Sisters
Trail, and an ongoing dog park project. The event also collects pet food donations each
year to donate to the local food shelf,
Thank you,
Laura Cogswell
Event Coordinator
612 - 968 -3130
dogdays @westonkacc.com
-1553-
August 12, 2013
City Manager's Comments:
The determination for setting fees depends upon use, intensity of use, length of use,
competition /demand for the space, and demands on city staff, equipment and other support
needs.
Fees that have been waived in the past are no longer being waived for these reasons:
The City is in search of revenues, so waivers are less prevalent or less
generous.
Fledgling organizations have benefited from fee waivers while gaining their
footing. Once stabilized, must pay fees as other established organizations pay
fees (i.e., Lions Club, Our Lady of the Lake Church, Masons, Jaycees, etc).
3. The Spirit of the Lakes Festival, being a City sanctioned (which is not the same
as city sponsored) festival, has all fees waived. Most other events are subject to
fees, full -or partial, depending upon use, intensity of use, length of use, and
competition /demand for the space, and demands on city staff, equipment and
other support needs.
4. Groups that have had fees waived or reduced in past years have been put on
notice that fees will eventually be imposed, the notice intended to reduce the
blow. * *See Aug 2013 letter from Hanson to Tyler.
Excerpts from City of Mound Fee Schedule --
DANCE HALL:
Public dance or live music $300 /yr.
$100 /day
PUBLIC GATHERING:
Parks or commons use fee: $300 — $600 /day
Damage Deposit $500 - $1000 /day
Permit fee and damage deposit to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon
receipt of application stating specific use and requirements.
-1554-
T
al
E
a
� al
N
Q
� al
o E
N
Q
� al
o
N
Q
.+ al
y
N
Q
v
v
a
N �
Y C
O w
Op aD b0 bd W OD W bd b0 CD OD OO b0 b0 � b0 b0 bD b0 OO
Y L L u L L L L L L L y L L u L L L y
m N \ (O !p i0 (0 (B m t0 @ N N \ u m t0 (O m m
C7 l7 C7 2i C7 C7 C7 U' C7 000 U' 2 C7 C7 U' U V l7
u u C u U= V u u U u u U C U, U U U U U
ospa Z :E:E oozan .00 1:5 n ozn
a s a a \ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a
u �
cN L
G m
v u
u -
c o
� O
� a
° o o° ° °0 0 0 °0 °0 °0 °o °0 0°
, �^Nm'^m m. m m m m
0 0 0 ° 0 0 0
0 0 ° 0 0 0
.gym nm
°0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 0
0
0 0
0 0 0
° 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N Y
OI m m N Q1 N O m w v N O 0l T T m
U N m 0 Y Y -0 m _O m W O) N .O O O -O m d G C 'in .O V
O a N V1 N (A N 0 C N (Y N N N N
J N N J m m j v N
m > O N N T> > Ql n
D O I- F- N �- N 0 3 V i- N U U to N> O (i H m h N
a
u
O Y m v w m Y C C U> E U U
CI 3 m m m J K Y 41 = 00 to Z N 0 w Z 2
t H N N a
o
N ry U` Q .0 U N m L aD O b0 m 0 L Q>
o am E Er.ac..��� mss vso°.:ow a o m_mZ
cO L L m m '^ d w o N
G> F- LL 41 LL N a' H LL O U LL 6i LL d a'
a
V W
N N vNi T O
N c m m m
WEI y �_ O O N U N u V L
y N m U m Q U v U LL m OO Y j v U
O m m G Y C a+ v 21 m lC. T Y N m 0
Z w i L N N m 0 m O .0 'O
U U J>> �'' LL C U V N~ m Y J U U N 0 O
U N j O O C 0` Z E N V>— C 00 C, p U U 61 0 0
3 3 0 2 2 2 2 0 2i 2 tr 3 0 ' u m_ 1555 - 3
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -_
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF MOUND AND WESTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ISD #277
WHEREAS, Westonka Public Schools, ISD #277, has an immediate need for a crossing
guard on school days on County Road #110 near Grandview Middle School; and
WHEREAS, the City had previously provided these services in a cost sharing
arrangement with the ISD #277; and
WHEREAS, the City Community Service Officer position has vacated and the City will
not continue providing this service in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has a duty to provide for pedestrian safety in the City and a long
history of cooperating with ISD #277 for student safety; and
WHEREAS, ISD #277 is willing to create, administer, and otherwise provide for a part -
time Crossing Guard Position in Grandview Middle School; and
WHEREAS, ISD #277 has requested the City to continue to participate in the cost
sharing arrangement with the City contributing $5,000 to fund the position, and that this
$5,000 payment shall be the extent of the City's participation during the 2014 -2015
school year.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, hereby approves the Memorandum of Agreement between the City of
Mound and Westonka Public Schools, ISD #277, as shown in Attachment A and made a
part herein.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of July, 2014
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
-1558-
Mayor Mark Hanus
Attachment A Page 1 of 2
This Memorandum of Agreement (hereinafter "Memorandum ") is entered into between
Westonka Public Schools, Minnesota Independent School District #277 (hereinafter "ISD
#277 "), and the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter "City ").
WHEREAS, ISD #277 has an immediate need for a crossing guard on school days on
County Road 4110 near Grandview Middle School; and
WHEREAS, the City had previously provided these services in a cost sharing
arrangement with the ISD #277; and
WHEREAS, the City Community Service Officer position has vacated and the City will
not continue providing this service in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City has a duty to provide for pedestrian safety in the City and a long
history of cooperating with ISD #277 for student safety; and
WHEREAS, ISD #277 is willing to create, administer, and otherwise provide for a part-
time Crossing Guard Position in Grandview Middle School; and
WHEREAS, ISD #277 has requested the City to continue to participate in the cost
sharing arrangement with the City contributing $5,000 to fund the position, and that this $5,000
payment shall be the extent of the City's participation during the 2014 -2015 school year.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto have entered into this Memorandum of
Agreement to serve as the terms and conditions of cost sharing agreement for the Grandview School
Crossing Guard for the 2014 — 2015 school year as follow:
The above recitals are incorporated into this Memorandum as if restated here; and
2. The City will pay $2,500 to ISD #277 on September 1, 2014 and February 1, 2015; and
ISD #277 is solely responsible for all required equipment, personnel, compensation,
benefits, pension plans, and withholdings associated with the provision of a crossing guard
on school days at County Road 4110 near Grandview Middle School; and
4. To the fullest extent possible, ISD #277 and its employees, agents, successors or assigns
agree to protect, defend, save, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees
from all claims, suits, or action of any kind arising out of this Memorandum. Nothing in this
Memorandum shall constitute a waiver or limitation of any immunity or limitation on
liability to which the City is entitled. The parties agree that these indemnification
obligations will survive the completion or termination of this Memorandum; and
The Memorandum shall terminate on the last student school day for the 2014 -2015 school
year at Grandview Middle School or earlier upon the mutual consent of the parties; and
-1559-
Attachment A Page 2 of 2
6. This Memorandum constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and no other
agreement prior to this agreement or contemporaneous herewith shall be effective except as
expressly set forth or incorporated herein. Any purported amendment shall not be effective
unless it shall be set forth in writing and executed by both parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Mound and the Independent School District #277
have caused this Memorandum of Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized
officers.
CITY OF MOUND
ISD #277
Kandis Hanson, City Manager Date Kevin Borg, Superintendent Date
-1560-
lw � • •
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 17, 2014
To: Mayor and City Council
xr.
From: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administrative Services
Subject: City of Mound Official Meeting Records and Minute Taking
Minnesota State Statute requires that official records be kept to provide a full and accurate
accounting of the City business.
Attached is an excerpt from the League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo on Meetings of
City Councils with regard to meeting minutes. The City of Mound is currently going above the
required contents of the meeting minutes by providing additional details of the discussions on the
regular agenda items. To illustrate, this is what appeared in the official meeting minutes of the
June 24, 2014 Council meeting:
4K. Approve resolution authorizing the purchase of a sewer vac truck for
Public Works
Hanus asked about the timing of the purchase as it relates to budget. Pausche
stated it was projected on the 2015 capital budget and will be depreciated in the
Sewer Fund. Pausche stated the decision of whether or not to finance will be made
as part of the 2015 bonding analysis. Gillispie asked about whether the old truck
was repairable and Ray Hanson said it was a 1985 model and the estimate to repair
was $20,000 - $25,000.
John Hubler, 5448 Breezy Road, questioned the estimate as he heard it was closer
to $6,000. Ray Hanson said that was just for the pump and that there are a number
of other issues. Hubler asked if it would be made available for the general public
to bid on it and Ray Hanson said probably not.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to approve the following resolution.
All voted in favor. Motion carried.
Iu I Oki IM Ve , .- . +.1 NEWMAN of
Alternatively, less detail of the discussion could have been included, as follows:
4K. Approve resolution authorizing the purchase of a sewer vac truck for
Public Works
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to approve the following resolution. All
voted in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -51: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
PURCHASE OF A SEWER VAC TRUCK FOR PUBLIC WORKS.
As Staff works to prioritize responsibilities and ensure essential services are provided, the
question was raised whether or not we are spending too much time on minutes when that time
could be used for other things. More condense minutes also helps the minute taker to avoid
adding interpretation or subjectivity to the summary.
It should be noted that the audio of every meeting is kept as well and can be combined with the
meeting minutes to form a comprehensive accounting of the City business.
Staff would appreciate the Council discussing their preferences for the level of detail in the
minutes and providing direction to Staff. Currently, Staff is evaluating resource allocation and
responsibilities and the feedback given will help to determine the outcome.
Please let Catherine know if you have any questions regarding this matter at (952)472 -0633
-1562-
RELEVANT LINKS:
-1563 -
League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/17/2013
Meetings of City Councils Page 24
B. Minutes
Minn. Stat. § 15.17.
City officers must keep all records necessary to provide a full and accurate
knowledge of their official activities.
Minn. star. § 412.151, subd.
A statutory city clerk must keep a minute book. In the clerk's absence, the
1.
Whalen v. Minneapolis
council should delegate the duty of taking minutes for that meeting.
Special Sch. Dist. No, 1, 309
Generally, the clerk has wide discretion as to how to keep the minutes. A
Minn. z197 zas N.w.za Ciao
(Minn. 1976).
verbatim record of everything that was said is not normally required.
Yt g Y q
However, in any case where the law or charter requires a verbatim record,
See Make Your Meeting
Minutes Count, Minnesota
using a tape recorder instead of a court reporter to accomplish that objective
Cities, Jan. -Feb. 2012.
is probably valid.
Minutes should be written in language average people can understand.
Reference to numbers of ordinances, resolutions, and other matters should
include a brief description of their subject matter.
A,& Op. 470-e Web, I S.
If the council finds a mistake in the minutes of the previous meeting, the
19591.
clerk should correct the minutes. If the clerk declines to make the
correction, the council can order the change by motion and a vote. The clerk
must then make the change and show in the minutes that the change was
made by order of the council.
Minn. Stat. § 412 22 1, subs.
The council must provide books and stationery for keeping minutes. State
Mina Star ¢ 15 17, subd.
law requires all cities to keep minutes on a physical medium that is of a
quality that will ensure permanent records.
Minn. Stat. § 412.15 1, subd.
Because minutes would likely be considered official papers of the city, they
should be signed by the clerk. Although not required by law, in many cities
the mayor also signs the minutes after the council approves them. If the
minute book includes only a clipping from the published proceedings, the
clerk should sign the clipping even though the signatures of the clerk and
mayor are already printed on the clipping. Minute books are public records
and must be available for public view at any reasonable time.
1. Required contents
The following items must be included in the minutes:
Minn. slat. § 13D.01, subd. 4.
a The members of the public body who are present.
Minn. Stat. § 331A.01, subd.
6. Minn. Stat. § 15 17, subd.
a The members who make or second motions.
I. MGm. Stat. § 412.151,
subd. 1. Minn. Star. §
® Roll call vote on motions.
412.191, subd. 3.
« Subject matter of proposed resolutions or ordinances.
Whether the resolutions or ordinances are defeated or adopted.
® The votes of each member, including the mayor.
-1563 -
League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/17/2013
Meetings of City Councils Page 24
RELEVANT LINKS:
See "Statement of Position
Meeting Minutes," Office of
the State Auditor.
2. Other items that should be in the minutes
The Office of the State Auditor has also recommended that meeting minutes
include the following information in addition to the information required by
state statute.
• Type of meeting (regular, special, emergency, etc.)
• Type of group meeting (city council, planning committee, etc.)
• Date and place the meeting was held.
• Time the meeting was called to order.
• Approval of minutes of the previous meeting, with any corrections.
• Identity of parties to whom contracts were awarded.
• Abstentions from voting due to a conflict and the member's name and
reason for abstention.
• Reasons the governing body awarded a particular contract to a bidder
other than the lowest bidder.
• Granting of variances and special use permits.
• Approval of hourly rates paid for services provided, mileage rates, meal -
reimbursement amounts, and per diem amounts.
• Listing of all bills allowed or approved for payment, noting the recipient,
purpose, and amount.
• List of all transfers of funds.
• Appointments of representatives to committees or outside organizations.
• Reports of the officers.
• Authorizations and directions to invest excess funds, information on
investment redemptions and maturities.
• Time the meeting concluded.
HNK. • •..
It is important to make a good record of council decisions and of the factual
information on which councilmembers base their decisions. Minutes are the
primary record of the decision - making process and are critical if council
actions are challenged.
Council actions are generally classified as either legislative or
administrative. The establishment of general policies and procedures is
legislative action and is subject to limited judicial review. Courts typically
will not substitute their judgment for a council's judgment on these topics.
-1564 -
League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/17/2013
Meetings of City Councils Page 25
City of Mound
SMI Engineering Hours YTD as of 06/30/14
Project
Hours
$ Billed
Fund
Fund /Funding Source
Mound /Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision
9.50
1,184.00
Escrows
Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners
Mound /MCES Projects, Review /Coordination
7.00
1,013.50
Escrows
Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners /agencies
Mound /Development Reviews
7.00
1,011.00
Escrows
Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners
23.50
3,208.50
Mound /General Engineering
146.00
12,03128
101
General Fund /Taxes
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4)
29.25
2,985.75
101
Streets (1/4) /Taxes
Mound /GIS Updates
16.75
1,550.75
101
Streets /Taxes (1 /4)
192.00
16,569.78
Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall
81.00
9,271.00
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /SW Island Area
12.50
1,241.50
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland
1.50
162.50
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements
801.00
77,045.50
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
Mound /Emergency Retaining Wall Replace
47.50
5,507.00
401
Capital Projects fund /Bonding
Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall
2,194.00
225,378.50
401
Capital Projects Fund /Bonding
3,137.50
318,606.00
Mound /MSA System Update
33.50
4,740.00
402
Municipal State Aid for Streets (MSA Funds)
Mound /2013 Crack Seal Coat Project
16.00
2,081.50
427
MSA Funds /General Funds
49.50
6,821.50
Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace
241.50
25,803.50
601
Water Fees
Mound /Water System Modeling
34.50
3,947.90
601
Water Fees
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4)
29.25
2,985.75
601
Water Fees (1/4)
Mound /Wellhead Protection Plan
3.50
507.50
601
Water Fees
Mound /GIS Updates
16.75
1,550.75
601
Water Fees (1 /4)
325.50
34,795.40
Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction
3.50
343.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction
2.50
245.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2012 Lift Station Reconstruction
1.00
98.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvement
49.00
5,168.00
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvement
200.00
29,903.30
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /2015 Lift Station Improvements
10.00
1,385.50
602
Sewer Fees
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4)
29.25
2,985.75
602
Sewer Fees (1/4)
Mound /GIS Updates
16.75
1550.75
602
Sewer Fees (1/4)
Mound /2012 MCES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct
74.50
7,674.00
602
Sewer Fees
386.50
49,353.30
Mound /WCA Administration
1.50
160.00
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /SWPPP Update
20.50
2,286.50
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4)
29.25
2,985.75
675
Storm Water Fees (1/4)
Mound /GIS Updates
16.75
1,550.75
675
Storm Water Fees (1/4)
Mound /Surface Water Management
26.00
3,641.00
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /2013 Storm Drainage Improvements
1.00
145.00
675
Storm Water Fees
Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements
144.00
14,712.00
675
Storm Water Fees
239.00
25,481.00
06/30/14 YTD Total
4,353.50
454,835.48
-1565-
Z
0
O M N— 0 MO N F � 0 M. . O r o; r M M a O
0 w M.10—ON Q to M ...
2 m O O N fO IQ O Q N Q
n F r N M [O N v r O M O N N Y'i O r M 0 (O W M O N IN O m
INN M N N ^_ M V mm v v
C)
ON
N M O h M O N (O M of !O O (O t0 O Q r O (O O W O t O M N
W uJ r O �- O N r Q N M [O O> r MOO M m Q N M Q t0 O N F
10
� m n Mmn MM r OQrF �OMO�D7 (O O>(O t0 N M
N
a
U
M` O N N O O M N O
r M r W Q� OJ O1 (O (D M (p LO
U O O Q y r O M (p Q N W fD m r O O (O o> W M t0 O Q M O M
Q F O Q N tD M M N M c0 Q M
MNN M Q t9 N O Q7 O t0 N
NNQ MNN ��- v v QM
n Q M O N 0 0 (O N o7 M (O M r^ N Q N O Q n n O M
aJ Q N M � M r n N ONO N Q r M m N M O M f0 M (O (O M
Qm n m"rOOi co n ry o Mnmci oMmoim m romm o
W O N (O
I N � V0 Q (O N M O (p Q
Q N Q N N M N N— v Q f7
MO tO Mt'JO N Q nn MNrQ7 O� rtOM�OM nON�M O
M n N N O N O N N Q r O Q N W M O] N O r F
O O of N v r O n lD n � N O M n W n O N 0 M l0 M OJ n N M
O N
O N
(O M
M
Q (O
(O N
M M
O M
M
M
W N
N
M M
O
M
W N
(D O
Q m
M
M
M N
Cl! O
Q M
O
M
U a
m m
o c �
O M Y
N
N
z N ('J a o 2<m O m N << O '2
m o�d O
� °o
C N C y p
02
U �m NEvmdmmmmooE"t
W c m m d y E v m m 0i m aEi aEi c c
a o a o 0 0 0 0 0 o c — 8 man d a c
Q m m nn an nnnv `m m m0 m c�c� »� c3 E QLLLLZ
wdLLy wEwOr EEEEEEE¢d'i -- ma`�`0 i
C7
Z
F
Q
a
Z d'
� F P
Yp m
V mj
Z
a
x
w
a
Q
m
W
LL
e
e W 2
ULL
� 6
W k
LL LL•
d
a w
m Z
O Q
K
A >
C
d
U
d
a W
❑ N
F Z
Y W
N
a
N O W W m P h m W N m m M t0 N F
h N M V N m N V O N P h h m W m N m m m O O lO P N P
01 O F-
O m N P O m (O m W O m O N e' IO lO h m P m
O O - Ol (p
N � "
m m P h m N M (O O] h N m N OD (O W P W h O F
N m O vI M O m h N N P N O) V ry
N N l0 M m m W W N O V � Cl
N � N
r N h N N h m Or O (p h N W m M N N P V O) N H N
O_ O OI N Oi h F m !� O O N m m
tl N N N N m N N M h �- O O O h F
N N N P th M O m m N m N N m
N r r r
p) (p W P A N 01 N (O W h^ m O W W P P O) m <O f0 P O N
1
It N N
N O+ m N F m m W P F V t+NI m m N r r r m F P O m
W W OJ [O V N N N P N N m O
e o o e o 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 M a e o o e o
Y] O m m m m M N O O m F O N m m m h O V O W m O O NW m
� r
N O OI h W N P O h f0 m m O F N O m O
tp P m f� m P h h 01 m O O m W 0 W W V m 0 0 0 N N (O O V h O
m c� o�i "�nov6�o ci oi .-m pair a)M vim FOi r �OF
N h N N N d' •- ro � m 0 (0 �- ONi V N N W� N N m �
h N m V' N m N O O 10 P fo h P m' m m (O W O O (O P N P F
O m N P O ♦O �- (O M W O m O1 O m M O m" m m h m P W e-
m
N m N F V th r N Oi T � m N m N
r O M O h O O O O m O N
O O m O O O O P N Q2 lO 'O O O F^ O F N F O (O m O N fp A
horn om min �o mNmammmm o m Mm ePmmP
ai m (O N O O n f0 N W W ry
m m W � m 0 0 (O m m N Cl P N F P N P OI O h m aI m N W O
M (O m W P P 01 F O m V M
m
N C C
w m
U D
2 U
LL ❑ d 6] d- T m N '`C,
LL oc S c a w c m Z'L' w
o Zw
_ 6
m min. 3y
O A O N N= N
K o o m c y v w= o o E `m v m o p v LL W W m Q d o 0
Zc�aUwii¢�Ui3 c�a wo. in aU t-UU _1567_U �� P F3m��m_
0
m
W
LL
e
r
`a W >
W w
a
i
0
O d
°a
zw v i
0 v O
W N m
O
o °a m
� d
rm�
'- c t
UW u ❑=
z R >:'
w
w
vu
O =
'u
g o
}
Q
o a o e o a a o o a o a
o
a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o q
O O N (O N m V O r (O V N
O
N N O V N N m O
oNMmrmC6oa Koim
o
m do mrnrMCO
N N V N O
N N
N
N
d
M
N N E< N
O Oo m m (O
O) M M
<
(O N
N M W V a0 m [O
�- O (O m
00
m r N m N m m O OI O V O
M
O) N N r O N N r m W
d
O
t7 (p N m
m N M
m
c
r f0
m r N N N lt) V
O'
d
av�vmN vmoCO
0
o�n rommmo. -r
n
r m m m v M o m m
r r N
m m m M v m N M
ry N M m
y
(O V m N M m
r O r m O
y
V
m N N
(O O m Co
O
O
N
J
(2 d' O2 ems' V
N
0
m
r
o o Cn`mvv ,n
K
_NCO v vo
mma m �_ N
(00
vin o m V OO v
d
V V N V (O d
01
a•
r V1 N N v N 0
M �' N
w
N N N
.�- N N
c
c2 m M
o a o e o a a o o a o a
o
a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o q
O O N (O N m V O r (O V N
O
N N O V N N m O
oNMmrmC6oa Koim
o
m do mrnrMCO
d
u
2
O N N N N m O (O N N V
00
m r N m N m m O OI O V O
M
O) N N r O N N r m W
d
O
c
d
av�vmN vmoCO
0
o�n rommmo. -r
n
r m m m v M o m m
N
m m m M v m N M
ry N M m
y
(O V m N M m
r O r m O
y
V
Cmi N f0
J
0
J
N
N
d
m
r
o o Cn`mvv ,n
K
_NCO v vo
mma m �_ N
m
vin o m V OO v
d
V V N V (O d
01
a•
r V1 N N v N 0
M �' N
w
N N N
.�- N N
c
3
0 0 0 o m 0 0 0 0 o
w
m o o n m o 0 o O v o
m
N N v o cc 0 0 0
or o_M
U)
mv� u�mvOOOOO.
N M N m M ,0 •' r � m N
T
O (O m M O O Q N
Z
M
O
W
W
Of
a
N
O
U)
N N
d
c m
h
E 5
d
N N
p
Q
6 N w
N
a
d N
y N U
W
Of
I—z
Vi CEdN
F
r J
m
W
w
LL N d.2
m
LU
Q k m
U
m z
=O�1568 ==
z
za
a
W
z
7
O
LL
In
Harbor Wine & Spirits 2014
Date Cust 14 Cust 13 Variance Sales 2014 Sales 2013 Difference +/- Cash
January
8,851
8,714
137 192,445.57
184,339.57
8,106.00
-47.59
February
8,587
8,614
-27 190,271.10
200,423.60
- 10,152.50
-25.19
March
9,099
9,237
-138 211,432.20
207,569.80
3,862.40
-6.97
April
9,601
9,100
501 210,788.96
196,147.79
14,641.17
-0.85
May
12,520
10,590
1,930 274,669.39
243,744.83
30,924.56
-3279
June
10,827
- 10,827
257,333.00
- 257,333.00
July
12,196
- 12,196
299,483.48
- 299,483.48
August
12,806
- 12,806
304,315.79
- 304,315.79
September
10,183
- 10,183
213,541.40
- 213,541.40
October
10,339
- 10,339
234,353.00
- 234,353.00
November
10,184
- 10,184
241,629.40
- 241,629.40
December
11,023
- 11,023
291,300.67
- 291,300.67
Totals
48,658
123,813
- 75,155 2,874,182.33
- 1,794,575.11
- 113.39
�Y
-1569-
Sent via email and USPS
June 19, 2014
Dear Government Official:
Theresa Sunde
Government Relations Manager
The purpose of this letter is to inform you that, on or about August 1, 2014, Mediacom will be
adjusting our Returned Payment Charge from $25.00 per returned payment to $29.00 per
returned payment.
This fee will be applied to all customers whose electronic or paper payments are returned to
us as unpayable
Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 507- 837 -4878 or email me at
tsunde @mediacomcc.com.
Sincerely,
Mediacom Communications Corporation
1504 2nd Street SE, - 1570 -:a, Minnesota 56093
�WNNsT
P 'f
J
E �
v
�EF �ATIOM O\54
June 26, 2014
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD, SUITE 200 • II MINNESOTA 55364 e TELEPHONE 952/745 -0789 • FAX 952/745 -901
Gregory S. Nybeck, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOh
LMCD Mayors
LMCD City Administrators
LMCD Board Members
Greg Nybeck, Executive Director
Adopted 2015 LMCD Budget
lJ
Enclosed is a copy of the 2015 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) Budget, which
was recently adopted and certified by the LMCD Board of Directors. Minnesota State Statute
10313.635, Subd. 1 requires the LMCD Board, on or before July 1 of each year, to prepare and
submit a detailed budget of the LMCD's needs for the next calendar year to the governing body
of each municipality in the LMCD (with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be
provided by each municipality).
Per enabling legislation, the maximum levy the LMCD could forward to its member cities in
2015 is $437,179. We are pleased to forward an approved 2015 LMCD Budget that is well
below the maximum levy at $342,492. This is a 0.6% increase when compared to the $340,616
in the levy for the adopted 2014 LMCD Budget. The LMCD has recognized the economic
challenges that the member cities have faced in recent years and this has been taken into
consideration since 2009.
If your city has any comments about the adopted 2015 LMCD Budget, please let me know. On
behalf of the LMCD Board of Directors, I would like to thank all 14 LMCD member cities for
your continued participation and support of LMCD related activities. Please feel free to contact
me if you have questions. My e -mail address is gn beck e lmcd.org.
-1571 -
r ^-r Web Gage Address: httpWvv\,r•.vJrncd.org , E -mail P.ddress: Irned @imed.v0
? To protect and preserve Lake Minnetonka.
_c >- =on ca�E,,re v ane
•'
LLJ
.,
1'
•
co
0
UJ
ul
Q
p !N6 N o o o 0 0 0 0 0 o a e o
d O c5 O O M r O to M O o O o N M O 6
c C G �- V 'y' O � Q N o N 6
C Afp
0
O N (hO O M 0 0 tND O N N O m QOi (p
°p C r co v o e 0 tM N N Oi O p
N J
N
o O OD OC O t0 V N O O � N
C M Op �~j' 00 OI M w
W J
(n N
Q O W O O M (0 Y O aD N b
C M Q m m 0 W m N M V W
Ly bN Z M to 0 C C6 (6 Vi
N J
u o o rn rn p o m r w
m C N M O V m �' O 0 N m ,y' 6 O c a 7
v
Q
M
o W V o 0 0 ° o a e ° o 0 o c o e
0 4- �p N ro W V m N OJ V m N m a V
Z U Z
W V M O N M O
M z M r M M M V
M N V m M w N O O �
N
O
O
R
IN
O
v
K
d d
<t
N
O
fir..
O
V
O
pMj
t0
M
_m
(hD
O0
0�
N m
A
r`'9
m
O
V
O
o�
V
O
roA
m
C4
C6
Lo
r
V
(D
Lo
W
N
pNj
Cp
C
cd N Q.
Q I x Q O `s
ul p 0 2 Q y O a Q Q a zz
IL W W W m W K am < Pn
O
y O
ul0 W z�15 2�0Rz O
m
M
0
a
O
O
m
m
Y
`m
N
n
O
M
O
QI
M
O
N
in
Z
d
a
m
J
E
N
N
a
0
c
E
m
m
0
e
0
m
w
0
R
N
V
3
x
d
c
16
`o
U
e
m
a
U
z
r
0
c
U
2
U
F
Z
m
� mm�
3 IQ tO LO
1p V N (V
a mY
U
F m
Z5
z
b
G
N
S�
8
N
O
A
v y
p� N
C � U
n"
m � c
a c_
� m
E
mmm 41
d U O 'U
U ry � d
c 2 �
z
Q
a �
C CL r N M CP O (0
o °•
o<
LL 0
09
W
N 000000 N
r f V ct U) O N V! T O O O r O O O o d d m d o 0 0 o O m w M tm r m o m
O O O O O O O O O
NY O U N N N QI p mm N M M 00 V
N N b j
M N N
C1
0000000 O O W O O M 0 0 0 0 00
00 M A O
m D O O O O t9 N M O N O O A CO v N ( O O 0
m O 0 C O O (O A O 0 O O C (O N r
A O N
U U O m O O N N m O I N O N A
Q � O V Ui (V N (O N O/
M O N C U -4
r
O
AD m
O d
N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0000 O O T O m M m o m
m U J O O 0 0 0 N O A O O O O r
N V A � O O O
m O O O N O 0 O O M O O O ml AD
O M N v O m
tF O (7 U) h r N OD d' O UD U) N W O O N M m A N m
r .6 N r O^ m M r N N N M N r M N V
K
N m
N W r N (D O m r M O At N 0 0 0 0 (0 M m m N O A M M
$ O m M m O O O i m W N O O A O r m 0 r M A
O O O M (D O N � mm to O O O (O A r pp A r N �j
M N 06 A} O O N N M N AD M C 06 L6 N D7 N r
QG V N M O ? m O N N m r M N M At
10 "'R
tP r
Q
J f O 0 0 0 0 0 m O O O O O 0 0 0 0 m O O O r N O N
O O 0 0 O O O O O O O d O O O O N r O r
0 0 0 0 O O M AM aD N O O O C'1 (O V O O r A O0
� M 0O Di 0 0 r N r AN w U) N � O (D U) N M N N n
® 0 9 N r O- Mm m M c N N (060j M m r M N '0' 4q
N m
F
l3J
O O O OJ O O O r O O m O O O tD N A O
A M A v m A M O A (O O d M m N O � V O M O M
ro O m h h M A M V 00 O O M 0 N v m W N O N N
m N w r 0 6 r M N C 0 r U) C% O K 00 N U) V pj O' a} (+1
G N O r w m O -At V M m P n M W r N N V
< N Q r r
N
Ni
N
N
a)
C
LU N
U ww c W
AD
d y c w U *6 W
ay U
< >
w Eg LU
O y 2 > u o
O V5 AV W A- C j AV m �L° 'v .v yu a> i U m'E F -cW W U2 ouQV
='
a) 0. 0. m 0i F 4E1QU Ea iri dwO aNi� Z6,
S m to rn w Q u a— m O d N U m h
� < y w �Q A E-J u c cy� 0B(nZ
c E< w E 'a ESQ Q ani o Ww� w hZ a�i w dmm W m cU
�0 C (n 7 U J A E J LO "" E J 8 N 2 N J W U J
a7 O .G 'C G a d h c o a E d h d y a w H W ~ y N H w v y H
J r m y our :s O =2 — m c o o.� ai uviQ �, � c mU E O e� ° O
�•E .JnUJO O m s�O� m .fir --���y J �Z f,(n LL Lu �O n.m
Q m.A u•a m�rnVF Q mn vo (9 W ma U(q F- .�2�' nr .o uV1 V mn(n
r N ( -1573- ° F°- ®°Q ' ro
I
ik M
a r
a a
C Q
O Q
LL a
a
N. 0* m
O P N
P P P
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m o m w O O O PI
M-0 O O O O O O O O O O M O O W O O O O O O O (D O (0 N p (p a
(O
Q d sJ N M O P-7 r-< V N N Nv N M M a P cl y V y
P N QA
C 'O
P L
o O.
N
O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f0 O 00 O O O (H N
O (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O (O 0 0 0 O O O O (O O t D O O N O
++ (O O N n 0 0 (n O sr OD
P N (+)- (N�1 1< ti r r` V La M
N U7 Y
M O M P O M (+D at M— V O< P O O O O
'a V O M M tO P O M M N V O (9) O< N N 00 1 P
NO M M 01 < O a O (D N O N O O h )O (p ( M O) O P W O P r A
OG V (+i N C) O) P (, M < H M N 0N0 (� r` M N N IOD
V
Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 O w O O O O
Q O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O tO t0
w (O (O 0 0 N O O (O O O O O O O O O V CO'i
UJ
H
Wf
O) O h c 0< p) M O O M M M P (O (n N M O O O O O M PI
0 r (O O N M iO M M O O P <y u O r M c0 n N O O) ro
Ma W O) O 0 O< M ' w m N M N M n P m w O to N
in V N (`i m < (p et or N N M tND O (O Y> d' M"
O
r (O.g Qa N d
w
W_
2 0
O
H N
N 72 ui
O) �
ilf U O U
a E a O
y E
aV i (n Oa U ~ cC9 uT z —L+(u L W U. a E C O cm o U a
r y C eFe= p E m
. o uE a c O
O ' z
E
E U.
F 0 m 0cm E Q
a ° 0 o
°gam Z oV v w a 9
c a w a a fl G 0 (�-
u c m m= Q s Y Q [A u Q tq �" 6 o L° c c
09 ooayC .n 9 Wvw°O OEEO m c0 vo`O ° a
a fE —a a o 'c m w a a E t- io 0 o f- •. o y �- : F w •L E c o
aOF.'Saa�(n5am �u.c.>m ��axm cQc� 'E 'a ._
O (C� aro acrnr = �_u cEvs U Aay J ma V to U mav8 C8 Q w C? 6Q-
ri v
o
-1574 ® (e
P
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
0 0 0
0000
(0 O w
O O O
O
N
O (O 0 0 0 0 0 N O (D 0 0 0 A
O O O
0 0 0 O
O to m
O)
p
7
P
N
N
�
m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m o m w O O O PI
M-0 O O O O O O O O O O M O O W O O O O O O O (D O (0 N p (p a
(O
Q d sJ N M O P-7 r-< V N N Nv N M M a P cl y V y
P N QA
C 'O
P L
o O.
N
O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f0 O 00 O O O (H N
O (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O (O 0 0 0 O O O O (O O t D O O N O
++ (O O N n 0 0 (n O sr OD
P N (+)- (N�1 1< ti r r` V La M
N U7 Y
M O M P O M (+D at M— V O< P O O O O
'a V O M M tO P O M M N V O (9) O< N N 00 1 P
NO M M 01 < O a O (D N O N O O h )O (p ( M O) O P W O P r A
OG V (+i N C) O) P (, M < H M N 0N0 (� r` M N N IOD
V
Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 O w O O O O
Q O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O tO t0
w (O (O 0 0 N O O (O O O O O O O O O V CO'i
UJ
H
Wf
O) O h c 0< p) M O O M M M P (O (n N M O O O O O M PI
0 r (O O N M iO M M O O P <y u O r M c0 n N O O) ro
Ma W O) O 0 O< M ' w m N M N M n P m w O to N
in V N (`i m < (p et or N N M tND O (O Y> d' M"
O
r (O.g Qa N d
w
W_
2 0
O
H N
N 72 ui
O) �
ilf U O U
a E a O
y E
aV i (n Oa U ~ cC9 uT z —L+(u L W U. a E C O cm o U a
r y C eFe= p E m
. o uE a c O
O ' z
E
E U.
F 0 m 0cm E Q
a ° 0 o
°gam Z oV v w a 9
c a w a a fl G 0 (�-
u c m m= Q s Y Q [A u Q tq �" 6 o L° c c
09 ooayC .n 9 Wvw°O OEEO m c0 vo`O ° a
a fE —a a o 'c m w a a E t- io 0 o f- •. o y �- : F w •L E c o
aOF.'Saa�(n5am �u.c.>m ��axm cQc� 'E 'a ._
O (C� aro acrnr = �_u cEvs U Aay J ma V to U mav8 C8 Q w C? 6Q-
ri v
o
-1574 ® (e
P
d
00 O O
�
at K
a
CL
T y
m v
.0
N Q
« Q
P
P
T
O Q
d
0
LL 01
71
p
O V
go
W
ul
N m
eu
O
O O
O o
O O
O
O
O
T .O
Co
�
N Z
O
O O
O N
N
O
N
{
g y
m
O
V �O
O d
N
O
O O
O O
+
O
O
�
OJ
CY
N m
E
Al
O
d
01
6
NS 2 r
a � G
0
N LL
W W C
d
CL w d
N 9
CL
j c 2
z re E ti
X
f :N N
=W w
O Nn
Q
ND
M
O
O
O
1+9
O G
QI
1"S
4
O
d
C
E
F
;o
_u
Z
It
O O� N�
O rl n
o
O Lo N�
o
O NI N�
N O
cm 0
61 T
C 00 P
� N R
(a
E
O
d p 10
C �
E
� � t
W
W
� S®
aZ
w c
to
a` W =
LL
N p,
Li CY
Qp
QNNNNNN -1575—
00 O O
�
a
CL
T y
r
.0
N Q
-W
°J
d
o
O
p
O V
go
W
ul
N m
eu
0
O O
O
Co
�
N Q
N
E
Al
O
d
01
6
NS 2 r
a � G
0
N LL
W W C
d
CL w d
N 9
CL
j c 2
z re E ti
X
f :N N
=W w
O Nn
Q
ND
M
O
O
O
1+9
O G
QI
1"S
4
O
d
C
E
F
;o
_u
Z
It
O O� N�
O rl n
o
O Lo N�
o
O NI N�
N O
cm 0
61 T
C 00 P
� N R
(a
E
O
d p 10
C �
E
� � t
W
W
� S®
aZ
w c
to
a` W =
LL
N p,
Li CY
Qp
QNNNNNN -1575—
v
0
a
N
_d
_
D;
g &
in a
N R
« E
_
o w
00 £
0
`o
G
O -
V p C
'a umi,rn��o° e°�•a ao 000 �o�- 000 «
Cd D °o��e�on, °o a°DO v� n oN nm o0O 0
O .PI
O a 6 d .c z
m u E
U N = g C
J o %mM
C 6. E c e
w 0 « wv N
°c
m O
'E a cc An'°Jn
a m LO m voz
O N i9 o N
s N O9
� A �
N .6 v V N
d € R d
4 E
d
v ° E
N m c m _
m c E W O m e
m
Ql w r nw M • e� G h
fi N °'wc ,.," 8 c . S aca w o
b -tea a o E V pp_ o a5 o p
u
W N aN o Pb = " vyw a m u�5
w L
€ W u X "- _ € o Q U D v ro Y c � m e H
N T D U
@ E V
di4 A G Ir Cat
1°a3iEu%iEEm N$ Uby E�uiav u Apo moo°
v LS 3a°aN : U: J uCaz� aUU a:
-1576-
U
D
c
N
C
0
s"
N
0
v
J
rn
_
a
aci
a
L
N
N
A
a
u°.
s
U
v
A
b
Q
N
C
$
O
J
@ > = r
@
m
pO
o
J
W,S_ V
0 0 3 0
�
P
E
@
«
°
�.a
9
«?'
a
oa
e
O
v« o m
c
; a
c
NON 0 g �`
c
O O o n
a
S
b
N
m fE @ C
c
L N
l6
0 LL
LL
N �NN0 M
y
N
@ N@ V
£
C
N N
C
tp to O
19
sd.
v
°•
ooc�
u
o o
E
Nms2 Nm
N
era
o
d o
«
E o
v
c% v
o o d
,e. c o
o
o
c
9
E
0
#
LL
LL
a E l
� a
w �
;e
0
U
'
a
Z
@«
n
v
m L
m
9
m
°
a
a
E m c o
uj
a
W
Z w
2 H m
u
o
0
p 0
m
1
o
"m Q
_5
c
m 0
m
c7 c c o
.� y c c d
y+
P v m m
v
w-
- -d
(L IX
ULL .
6
o
w
— X'
W
a
E
C Qw O
-1577-
p
E aci m y
w
y
E£E'
d
�`
ES@
N
H
O 4
ma
�N�tgi�
O O r
ANON
U
E_G..:
w�
N@
OOm
C
C C 9 2
o
W
E�
'3
N
a M b
N
Y
@
m m
N E
_�
°
m
Q
N ss. N
N
o
N N 0
L
N
LD
g
Q
Q
O
N N
E
Q ? °
N
O N
v
v.
0v.&'«
rnE
d
a
v
={p� @md
E a
v
Door
O
a
a
u N L
o
p
c
u.E
owMmO
m O
Nwwa
�cr2
d
L
d
Jr
N
°o
o
g�-
v
A
b
Q
^i
ry
O
@
«
°
o
°
9
a
e
O
`y
c
m
S
b
`.
R
c
Y
0 LL
V G IL a
c
y
W r
b lL @
N @ = LL _
c
sd.
°
°
.Z
tL
u
ase
Z
Q
N Zmm
Nms2 Nm
r
c
°�
«
r
O
c% v
o o d
,e. c o
o
o
c
9
0
#
LL
LL
a E l
� a
w �
;e
«
3°
0
a
Z
@«
d N
W
m L
9
g
a
W
Z w
2 H m
u
d 0
0
p 0
m
1
o
_5
c
m 0
m
c7 c c o
.� y c c d
J
w�
- -d
(L IX
ULL .
6
ldd
Q6
w
— X'
a
-1577-
2014 LMCD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
(As of May 28, 2014)
The LMCD is governed by a Board of Directors comprised of one volunteer member appointed by each of the
14 cities surrounding Lake Minnetonka. Board officers include Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary, and Treasurer.
Dan Baasen
Chair
dbaasen @lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Wayzata
Andrew McDermott
Secretary
amcdermott@lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Orono
Jeff Clapp
jclapp @lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Tonka Bay
Ann Hoelscher
aoelscher@lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Victoria
Dennis Mobs
dklohs @lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Mtka. Beach
Jeff Morris
jmorris @lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Excelsior
Sue Shuff
sshuff @lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Minnetonka
-1579-
Jay Green
rice Chair
jgreen @lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Mound
Gary Hughes
Treasurer
ghughes @lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Spring Park
David Gross
dgross @lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Deephaven
Anne Hunt
ahunt @lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Minnetrista
Fred Meyer
fineyer @lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Woodland
Rob Roy
Troy @lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Greenwood
Deborah Zorn
dzom @lmcd.org
Appointed By
City of Shorewood
May 29, 2014
TO: LMCD Member Cities
Lake Minnetonka Legislators /
LMCD Stakeholders J
FROM: Greg Nybeck, Executive Director i rl
SUBJECT: Annual LMCD Report
The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) is pleased to forward its Annual Report
(June, 2013 to May, 2014). The LMCD Board of Directors and staff manage the use of Lake
Minnetonka's surface waters (via State of Minnesota enabling legislation) since the LMCD's
inception in 1967. Management is performed with the highest regard and to the best of
abilities.
Management of Lake Minnetonka requires a great deal of cooperation and partnerships with
a number of public and private sector organizations. A few of these include:
e 14 Lake Minnetonka Member Cities and their respective communities;
• Hennepin County Sheriff's Office/Water Patrol;
• Hennepin County Environmental Services;
• Minnesota Department of Natural Resources;
• Three Rivers Park District;
• Minnehaha Creek Watershed District;
• Commercial Stakeholders (i.e., marinas, charter boat operators, and dock installers);
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; and
• General Public.
This Report will provide you further information on the following:
e General background of the LMCD; and
e An overview of the LMCD's programs and activities.
Your feedback on this Annual LMCD Report would be greatly appreciated. Additionally, I
welcome any questions you may have. I can be reached at qnvbeck Imcd.ora or at 952-
745 -0789.
�1,, Web Page Address: http: / /www., 158 9_, E -mail Address: Imcd@lrncd.crg
i
30%1I.,A 0..s ,I Waste To protect and preserV Lake Minnetonka.
Table of Contents
Section I- General Background
• How the LMCD Began
• How the LMCD Has Evolved
• Contact Information
• LMCD Demographics
Section 2- Highlights of Programs and Activities
• Aquatic Invasive Species
• LMCD Code of Ordinances
• Financial
• Lake Use and Recreation
• Public Outreach
Page Number
1
2
3
ii,
r
How the LMCD Began
The LMCD was created by State of Minnesota (State) enabling legislation in 1967;
Minnesota Statutes 10313.601 through 10313.645.
The creation of the LMCD was a result of concerned citizens working for nearly a decade to
improve Lake Minnetonka. Those efforts included:
• In 1889, a special law of the State provided "...no person shall pollute or defile the
waters of Lake Minnetonka.... ";
• In 1946, the Greater Tonka Council (composed of representatives of 100 civic
organizations) was formed to conserve and improve Lake Minnetonka;
• In the early 1950's, the League of Minnetonka Municipalities (a voluntary quasi -
governmental organization with representatives appointed by area municipalities) was
formed to increase the 1946 efforts through more direct liaison with local government;
and
• A coordinated and more specialized authority (although still a cooperative local effort)
was needed to "Save the Lake." Therefore, the Minnesota legislature passed enabling
legislation and the LMCD was organized in October of 1967.
The LMCD was charged with the following two general responsibilities: 1) to regulate the
use of the Lake and 2) to develop a comprehensive program to eliminate pollution.
t ? l ,: r t S, . �
Early on, Lake Minnetonka's key issue was red algae blooms caused by untreated regional
sanitary sewage. This was resolved in the 1970's when sanitary sewers were installed.
® In the early 1970's, the concept of authorized dock use area rules was created. This
established reasonable riparian rights for the placement of dock structures and watercraft in a
defined area.
e In the early 1970's, the first Quiet Water Areas (QWA) were established on Lake
Minnetonka (requiring watercraft to traverse at minimum wake) to address public safety and
environmental concerns.
gi In 1978, regulations for the storage of boat density were adopted, which included the current
1:50' General Rule. Other regulations have been subsequently adopted.
e In 1987, Eurasian Watermilfoil (EWM) was discovered on Lake Minnetonka. In response to
this, the LMCD purchased mechanical harvesting equipment and, have since, harvested
EWM for public navigational purposes.
-1582-
Learning from the introduction of EWM, the LMCD has maintained that preventing the
introduction of new aquatic invasive species (AIS) made more sense than only managing AIS
after they had been introduced. Great efforts have been made on this since the early 2000's.
Unfortunately, zebra mussels were discovered in Lake Minnetonka in 2010.
The LMCD adopted regulations for the licensing and permitting of a number of activities on
Lake Minnetonka. These include:
• Multiple Docks (approved, legal storage of five or more restricted watercraft);
• District Mooring Areas (sailboat buoy fields);
• Watercraft for Hire (Charter Boats), including respective liquor licenses;
• Permanent Docks (pile driven structures that remain year round);
• Special Events (delegated, by resolution, to the Hennepin County Sheriffs Water Patrol);
and
• Winter De -icing (to prevent damage to docks [generally permanent] from shifting ice).
The LMCD is governed by a Board of Directors comprised of one volunteer member
appointed by each of the 14 cities surrounding Lake Minnetonka. Board officers include
Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary, and Treasurer.
LMCD consists of three full -time and one part-time staff members. This includes the
Executive Director, Administrative Technician, Administrative Assistant, and a part-time
Administrative Clerk.
:::.. a a. r a as t a.
Staff Members /E -mail Addresses
Greg Nybeck, Executive Director gmvbeck(a,lmcd.orQ
Judd Harper, Administrative Technician iharperAa lmcd.org
Emily Herman, Administrative Assistant ehennan lmcd.org
Tammy Duncan, Administrative Clerk Imcdaa lmcd.org
For further information or questions, please contact the LMCD at:
5341 Maywood Road (Suite 200)
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 745 -0789
(952) 745 -9085 - Fax
www.Imcd.org
1583-
LMCD Demographics
1. Lake Minnetonka Communities (14)
• Deephaven
• Excelsior
• Greenwood
• Minnetonka
• Minnetonka Beach
• Minnetrista
• Mound
• Orono
• Shorewood
• Spring Park
• Tonka Bay
• Victoria
• Wayzata
• Woodland
2010 U.S. Census Population Data
3,642
2,188
688
49,734
539
6,384
9,052
7,437
7,307
1,669
1,475
7,345
3,688
437
2. Total Population: 101,585 (based on 2010 U.S. Census Population Data)
3. Lake Minnetonka Physical Features:
• Shoreline- 125 miles
• Surface Use Area- 14,043 acres
• Number of Bays /Areas: 42
• Mean Water Depth: 30 feet
• Maximum Water Depth: 113 feet (Crystal Bay)
• Water Depths of Less Than 15 Feet- Approximately 39% of Surface Use Area
4. Public Access Ramps (10)
Managed By
Location
Carsons Bay
City of Deephaven
City of Deephaven
Cooks Bay
City of Mound
City of Mound
Grays Bay
City of Minnetonka/MN DNR
City of Minnetonka
Halsted Bay
City of Minnetrista
City of Minnetrista
Lake Minnetonka Regional Park
Three Rivers Park District
City of Minnetrista
Maxwell Bay
MN DNR
City of Orono
North Arm
Hennepin County
City of Orono
Phelps Bay
City of Minnetrista
City of Minnetrista
Spring Park Bay
Hennepin County
City of Spring Park
Wayzata Bay
City of Wayzata
City of Wayzata
3
HIGHLIGHTS OF PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES
Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS)
Eurasian Watermilfoil (EWM) Harvesting Program
e Mechanical harvesting of EWM was conducted for 26 working days from late June through
mid August. The first two weeks of the season were postponed due to minimal growth.
® EWM harvesting priorities were based on the accessibility of the harvesting equipment and
impediment to public navigation, with a higher priority given to areas of the Lake that were
matted. All areas that were accessible by the harvesting equipment were evaluated using this
priority (the vast majority of Lake Minnetonka).
e The LMCD's fleet of equipment consisted of three
harvesters and a transport barge.
® Approximately $80,000 was spent on this program in
2013. Primary funding sources included the LMCD's
AIS Management and Prevention Budget and a
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN
DNR) grant.
For further details, view the 2013 EWMHarvesting
Report on the LMCD's website at www.lmcd.org,
under "Pamphlets and Reports."
LMCD Mechanical Harvester
Watercraft Inspections
E Since 2002, the LMCD has coordinated inspection of watercraft /trailers at public accesses on
Lake Minnetonka. The 2013 program was a cooperative effort of the LMCD, Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District (MCWD), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN
DNR), and Three Rivers Park District (TRPD).
The goals of this program were to:
• Inspect incoming watercraft/trailers, as well as educate watercraft owners and operators,
to assist in preventing the introduction of new AIS into Lake Minnetonka; and
• Inspect outgoing watercraft/trailers, as well as educate watercraft owners and operators,
to assist in preventing the spread of AIS, in particular zebra mussels, from Lake
Minnetonka.
The MN DNR established Level I and 2 watercraft inspections throughout the state in 2012.
In general both inspectors may:
• Inspect watercraft for plants, other AIS, and contained water;
• Notify a licensed, AIS trained peace officer of an alleged AIS violation;
• Deny a launch or use of Lake Minnetonka (when deemed appropriate); and
• Require AIS preventative action for problematic watercraft.
-1585-
There are two additional authorities provided to Level 2 inspectors. Those inspectors may:
• Respectfully complete a visual inspection of the inside of a watercraft; and
• Conduct watercraft de- contamination procedures (when deemed appropriate).
The following highlights the 2013 Watercraft Inspection Programs for Lake Minnetonka:
The MN DNR conducted Level land 2 watercraft inspections on Lake Minnetonka (at no
costs to the Lake Minnetonka community). Peak days and times covered by the MN DNR
were coordinated to parallel coverage by LMCD inspectors (see below) at the Grays,
Maxwell, North Arm, and Spring Park Bay public accesses.
® To compliment MN DNR inspectors, the LMCD contracted with Volt Workforce Solutions
(Volt) to conduct Level 1 watercraft inspections at the Carsons, Cooks, Halsted, and Wayzata
Bay public accesses.
® Watercraft inspections were conducted from Memorial Day weekend through Labor Day
during the following days and times:
• Fridays (11 a.m. to 7 p.m.);
• Saturdays and Sundays (6 a.m. to 6 p.m.); and
o Holidays (6 a.m. to 6 p.m.).
® The TRPD, through its gate attendants, inspected
watercraft at the Lake Minnetonka Regional Park
from early May through Labor Day. This was
offered as an in -kind service estimated at 1,000
hours.
Approximately $33,472 was spent on this program.
Funding sources included the LMCD, MCWD, and
the MN DNR. This does not include the in -kind
service from the TRPD.
For further details (including statistical findings), MN DNR Inspector at Work, copyright MN DNR
view the MN DNR 's 2013 Summary Report of Watercraft Inspection Results at Lake
Minnetonka on the LMCD's website at www.lmcd.ore, under, "Pamphlets and Reports."
AIS Task Force
The LMCD's AIS Task Force was established in 1989 (originally called the EWM Task
Force). The primary goal of the Task Force is to provide guidance on a variety of AIS
matters (including exploring other AIS management and prevention techniques).
The Task Force is comprised of AIS professionals from various agencies, as well as other
Lake Minnetonka stakeholders. In 2013, they met monthly.
:.
A summary of some of the topics discussed (with some remaining on the forefront) include
the following:
• Investigated the idea of creating a West Metro AIS Coordinating Committee (for the
purpose of providing a more consistent message on AIS prevention and management
techniques throughout);
• Preliminarily reviewed prospective new AIS risks and preparations for the prevention or
management of;
• Reviewed 2013 watercraft inspection results for Lake Minnetonka and within the
watershed (including options for 2014);
o Reviewed 2014 AIS educational materials for Lake Minnetonka;
• Reviewed and provided input to the MN DNR on a Lake Vegetation Management Plan
submitted by the Lake Minnetonka Association for certain bays on Lake Minnetonka; and
• AIS training for local law enforcement agencies (required to enforce AIS State laws).
LMCD Code of Ordinances
Qualified Commercial Marinas
In September, the LMCD Board coordinated a workshop with Lake Minnetonka commercial
owners at Tonka Bay Marina. At this meeting, the commercial marina owners expressed
some concerns about certain aspects of the LMCD Code and requested that the Board
consider amendments to it. Feedback from the LMCD Board was for the commercial
marinas to firm up their requested changes in writing.
At a February 12th Board workshop, the commercial marinas submitted a written proposal
requesting three changes to the LMCD Code. These included: 1) allowing commercial sites
to construct docks out to 200 feet from the shore, 2) to exempt them from needing to provide
public amenities for approved special density licenses, and 3) to expedite the application
process for "minor changes" to their facilities, by providing the LMCD Executive Director
greater authority to administratively approve the applications (with conditions) rather than
the LMCD Board.
The LMCD Board discussed the commercial marina owners' proposal at its February 26`h
Regular Board Meeting. At this meeting, the Board agreed to support the idea of considering
the changes proposed by the commercial marinas. In an effort to provide a streamlined and
efficient review process, the Board also agreed to consider the changes for commercial
marinas first, with yacht clubs and other commercial docks (i.e., municipal and transient
docks) to be considered in the future.
® At its April 23rd Regular Board Meeting, the Board received public input and adopted an
ordinance for "Qualified Commercial Marinas." This ordinance was a slightly modified
version of the changes proposed by the commercial marinas (as recommended by the 2014
LMCD Executive Committee in conjunction with the commercial marinas).
Proactive Residential Code Enforcement Program
® Since 2006, the LMCD has coordinated the Proactive Code Enforcement Program for the
purpose of enforcing watercraft storage ordinances at residential sites on Lake Minnetonka.
-1587-
e The primary enforcement efforts established for the Program are to identify and /or re- inspect
sites storing: 1) five or more restricted watercraft that do not have a multiple dock license and
2) those storing three or four larger, restricted watercraft that do not comply with the 1:50'
General Rule.
The following 2013 enforcement priorities were established: 1) to take the necessary steps to
resolve problematic sites from 2006 forward, 2) document new violations, 3) continue with
the previously established communication process, and 4) re- inspect and define sites where
necessary (working with LMCD prosecuting attorney when warranted).
® The LMCD encourages voluntary compliance for all sites identified as being out of
compliance with LMCD's watercraft density ordinances. This process is offered via a two -
part, non - sequential written communication process; both of which offer staff's assistance
and provide educational material to further assess their storage needs.
• If compliance efforts are exhausted, staff documents the watercraft storage three days within
a 14 day period, at which time a Complaint is filed with the LMCD prosecuting attorney.
• For further details, view the 2013 Proactive Code Enforcement Program Report on the
LMCD's website at www.lmcd.ore, under, "Pamphlets and Reports."
Hennepin County Sheriffs Office Water Patrol
Enforcement of the majority of LMCD regulations relating to surface use activities was done
so by the Hennepin County Sheriffs Office Water Patrol (Water Patrol). Representatives
from the LMCD and the Water Patrol meet annually to update a Joint and Cooperative
Agreement that provides for this.
The Water Patrol's 2013 full -time staffing consisted of a Lieutenant, a Sergeant, six
Deputies, and support staff.
Staffing was supplemented by 28 Special Deputies
(volunteers) in 2013, which are required to go
through an extensive training program. The LMCD
(through Save the Lake) annually recognizes one of
the Special Deputies for their dedication to Lake
Minnetonka (see page 10 under, "Public Outreach ").
The Water Patrol provides enforcement for bodies of
water within Hennepin County, with Lake
Minnetonka receiving the majority of its patrol time.
Approximately 7,465 hours of patrol time were
logged on Lake Minnetonka in 2013, up from 4,360
hours in 2012.
Hennepin County Sheriff Water Patrol
• Educational safety programs are a high priority for the Water Patrol. A Hennepin County Ice
Awareness Detail was initiated in 2013 to better educate on the dangers of the poor ice
conditions (contributing to the increase in patrol time from 2012).
® A summary of key Lake Minnetonka enforcement statistics (from 2010) areas follows:
140 -I
--
- - --
$330,649
--- - - -- --
- -
- --
$330,649
2012
$322,208
2013
$330,604
----
116
120-
--
--
- --
- --
- -
94
100 t--
__..--_�--
.- --'--
-------
- ----
--
7581
80 - (---
- - - ---
--'-
'---__._.__-
--- ..._- --
--4 '-
60-
- - - --
'_---
45
----- ------
.-- - --- --
'-
21 14
20 ---
---
—
'- -8-g-4 --
-
--
L0110
1
0
-
I
Boating j
Personal
j
While
Careless
Careless
loation
Drownings Intoxicated
Boating
Consumptio ".
Device )
D I
(BWI)
Arrests
n Arrests
Citations
Arrests
48 I
1
j 21
73.
IB 20111
1
75 '
8
31
74
2012!
-1 -� -�
81 1
6 -
14
- 94 i
a 20131
0 —�-
45_ r
4
I - 25
_
Financial
r The LMCD's operating budget is comprised of both a General and AIS Management and
Prevention Fund. The budget is funded, in most part, by a levy through the 14 Lake
Minnetonka member cities. The 2013 and 2014 levies were $330,604 and $340,615,
respectively. The levies have remained relatively flat since 2009 (based on the LMCD's
recognition of the economic challenges that face the member cities).
Budget Year
Total Leyy General & AIS
2009
$330,649
2010
$330,649
2011
$330,649
2012
$322,208
2013
$330,604
2014
$340,615
The Save the Lake Fund was established in the 1970's. It is a non - profit initiative of the
LMCD to provide supplemental funding from privately raised, tax - deductible contributions.
The contributions received fund projects that benefit the environmental and recreational
needs of Lake Minnetonka, which are not funded through the LMCD's budget.
Some of the projects fully or partially funded by Save the Lake in 2013 and 2014 included:
• Expansion and replacement of red and green solar lights (see page 10 for further details);
• Establishing a Lake Minnetonka Boater Safety Education Program (see below);
• Purchase of "No Anchoring" buoys for Hennepin County Environmental Services for Big
Island; and
o Purchase of public safety equipment for the Mound Fire Department.
Lake Use and Recreation
Lake Minnetonka Boater Safety Education Program
® The LMCD Board of Directors supported the Save the Lake Committee's recommendation to
establish a Lake Minnetonka Boater Safety Education Program whereby youth (ages 12 to
17) work directly with presenters in obtaining their MN DNR Youth Operator Permit.
Participants not only receive their Operator's permit but also knowledge of Minnesota
boating laws through practical teaching, key on -board safety best practices, and the
understanding and awareness of Lake Minnetonka's unique boating experience.
® Guardians were encouraged to attend to enhance the value of training.
e In November, a pilot course was coordinated by the Save the Lake Committee. Training for
this course was provided by Committee member Jay Soule (with assistance from committee
member Torn Skramstad and Board member Gary Hughes). Eight youth and six guardians
attended this course. All youth, plus two adults, took the on -line MN DNR course and
received either their MN DNR Youth Operator or Boating Safety Certificate.
In April, the first of three 2014 coordinated
sessions' were held. Training again was
provided by Committee member Jay Soule.
Fifteen youth and seven guardians attended this
course. All youth, plus four adults, took the on-
line MN DNR course and received either their
MN DNR Youth Operator or Boating Safety
Certificate.
® This project has been a true public- private
partnership. Partners have included the LMCD
(through Save the Lake), Marine Max, Mound
Fire Department, Brian Roath,
St. Boni Motor Sports, and the Water Patrol.
e Expenses for these two training courses were paid
through the Save the Lake Fund.
-1590-
April, 2014
Cake Minnetonka Boater Safety Education Training
Solar Light Proms
Since 2002, red and green solar lights have been installed on navigational
buoys on Lake Minnetonka to assist in nighttime navigation.
® This program has been highly successful and has expanded over the years;
more recently 98 red and green solar lights in 2012 to 102 in 2013.
e Save the Lake funds 100% of the program costs (including the expansion and on -going
replacement /maintenance costs for both the lights and respective brackets).
® This important safety program has provided for the development of many positive
partnerships. For many years now, the Lake Minnetonka Charter Boat Association, who not
only contributes to Save the Lake, but also provides volunteers (primarily Al & Alma's and
Paradise Charter Cruises) on an annual basis to install and remove the lights from Hennepin
County's navigational buoys.
Public Outreach
Committee member Jay Green (who also serves on
the LMCD Board; more recently as Vice Chair);
• An update from Save the Lake Committee member
Jay Soule on the 2013 Lake Minnetonka Boater
Safety Education Pilot Program (as well as plans for
2014); and
• An update from the City of Wayzata on their Lake
Effect Project.
Special Deputy Sgt. Steen Erickson Receives
Special Deputy of the Year Award
The LMCD annually publishes two newsletters that summarize spring/summer and
fall /winter projects and activities. The newsletter is distributed to over 6,000 Lake
Minnetonka stakeholders.
® In 2011, the LMCD created a new and improved website. The goal of this project was to
improve public awareness while providing a more efficient navigational tool. The LMCD
10
-1591-
regularly updates the website so that all can be kept up -to -date on current projects as well as
general information. More pertinent information is highlighted under the "Hot Topic'
section of the website, found on the front page.
® The LMCD continued partnering with the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission
(LMCC) on the taping of Board of Director meetings for public viewing. Cable subscribers
in the Mediacom viewing area can view these meetings on their Government Channel 20.
Air times are listed on their website at www,lmcc- tv.org. Additionally, you can view the
meetings on their website, under "Video on Demand"
11
-1592-
PH: (952) 472 -0600
FAX (952) 472 -0620
WEB: www.mlyofmound.com
July 16, 2014
Mr. Dan Tolsma
City Administrator
City of Spring Park
4349 Warren Avenue
Spring Park, MN 55384
RE: Proposed use of Emergency Watermain Interconnect
The City of Mound has considered the City of Spring Park request for use of the
emergency watermain interconnect for a period of about two years, as you address the
TCE levels in your water system.
Mound staff met with the City's engineers and determined that although there is capacity
to provide water for an emergency, the system does not have sufficient capacity for long
term usage. The additional usage could reach an estimated 30% increase in our volume
and peak flows might not be able to be met. Our water system is not designed to handle
those increases on a long term basis. With this information I must decline your request to
assist the City of Spring Park in their need for additional water supply.
We value our relationship with Spring Park and wish we could help but unfortunately this
situation is not feasible for Mound. Please contact me if you have any questions or desire
Rather discussion.
Sincerely, /
Kndis Hanson
City Manager
952- 472 -0609
Cc: Mayor and Council Members
-1593-
p =iwr d on recyUetl paper
7/22/14 Agenda Item #9 Additional Information
City Manager Handout Page 1 of 2
Definitions Related to "Sponsor" vs "Sanction"
Per Webster's Dictionary, and applied as understood by City Staff
July 22, 2014
A sponsor is defined, for these purposes, as a person or organization that pays for or plans and
carries out a project or activity. The Spirit of the Lakes organization is the sponsor of the Spirit
of the Lake Festival.
In 2012, the Centennial was a city sponsored event in that the city passed a resolution engaging
the Spirit of the Lakes to put on the Centennial, on its behalf, sealing the agreement with the
$6,500 allocation.
The annual budget allocation by the city to the Spirit of the Lakes ($1500) is a `level of
sponsorship' among all other supporters of the Spirit of the Lakes Festival.
The in -kind labor provided by city staff as a historically implied commitment —so sanctioned by
the city. Sanction synonyms are: authorization, clearance, concurrence, consent, greet light,
custom.
7/22/14 Agenda Item #9 Additional Information
City Manager Handout Page 2 of 2
78 -121
LMCD charge based on slip length Set by LMCD
78 -121
Small watercraft slip fee
$100.00 /yr
78 -121
Lost Lake Slips Multiple (Villa of Lost Lake Residents)
$1,148.00/yr
78 -121
Lost Lake Slips Multiple (to Mound residents who are not
State Accident Report
$1.00
Lost Lake residents)
$1,950.00/yr.
78 -121
Lost Lake Slips Multiple (to Non -Mound residents or Lost
Drivers license check: non - resident
$1.00
Lake Residents for second slip)
$2,050.00/yr
78 -121
Lost Lake Slips Multiple (After August 1n of the year)
$1,000 /yr
78 -121
LMCD Charge (based on sf of slip)
Set by LMCD
78 -121
Multiple Slip Refundable Key Deposit
$50.00
78 -123
Processing fee for full slip refund
$50.00
78 -123
Processing fee for voluntary suspension of license
$50.00
78 -123
Penalty for boat at slip after Fall deadline
$100.00
FIRE SERVICES:
Fire report (MFD Report) $10.00
30 -51 Burning Permit $10.00
30 -51 False Alarm (per calendar year) 1" $0.00
2 °d $0.00
3rd $50.00
4th $150.00
5" -10th $250.00
ea. over 10 $500.00
PARKS & RECREATION:
Depot rental - residents $125.00 /day
Depot rental - non - residents $250.00 /day
Damage deposit $350.00 plus $50.00 cash
Cancellation fee (depot) $75.00
City Hall /Centennial Building room rentals $75.00 /day
PUBLIC GATHERING:
50 -20 Parks or commons use fee: $300.00 - $600.00 /day
Damage Deposit $500.00 - $1,000.00 1day
Permit fee and damage deposit to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon
receipt of application stating specific use and requirements.
TAX FORFEIT AND /OR CITY -OWNED PROPERTY
Fee for staff review of request for
release of tax forfeit and /or city -owned land
$200.00
Escrow Deposit for above
$500.00
POLICE SERVICES
Administrative:
State Accident Report
$1.00
Police report: up to 5 single -sided pgs
$1.00
Addn'I pages, same report
$0.25 ea.
Drivers license check: non - resident
$1.00
Photographs: cost + reproduction, film
$25.00
Audio Cassette
$15.00
Video Cassette
$25.00
Finger printing: resident:
N/C
Non- resident:
$25.00
7/22/14 Agenda ADDED ITEM 4G
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
RESOLUTION DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, the City of Mound experienced extraordinary rainfall levels for the month of
June 2014, and has continued to receive above - average rainfall in the month of July, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the extraordinary amount of rain has caused significant damage to the
timber retaining wall extending across three properties centered at 3025 Island View Drive in the
City of Mound ( "Retaining Wall "); and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer determined that the Retaining Wall is bulging and appears
to be in imminent state of failure; and
WHEREAS, to protect the public, City staff closed Island View Drive adjacent to the
Retaining Wall; and
WHEREAS, the structural integrity of the Retaining Wall is significantly compromised
such that it is hazardous and a danger to the health, safety, and welfare of the public using Island
View Drive and to surrounding property owners; and
WHEREAS, the structural integrity of the Retaining Wall must be restored immediately.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED pursuant to the powers granted to the City of
Mound by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 12.29 and 12.37, and Chapter 26 of the Mound City
Code, the City of Mound by and through its Mayor and City Council:
1. Declare the failing Retaining Wall to be a local emergency effective on July 22, 2014
and until the Retaining Wall along Island View Drive is replaced; and
2. Appoint the to be the director of the emergency management
organization and authorize that director to take all necessary and expedient measures
to immediately restore the Retaining Wall and continue to secure the area adjacent the
Retaining Wall.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound this 22nd day of July, 2014.
Mark Harms, Mayor
Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
447303v2 RJR NIU2204
7/22/14 Agenda ADDED ITEM 4G
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 14-
RESOLUTION DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, the City of Mound experienced extraordinary rainfall levels for the month of
June 2014, and has continued to receive above - average rainfall in the month of July, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the extraordinary amount of rain has caused significant damage to the
timber retaining wall extending across three properties centered at 3025 Island View Drive in the
City of Mound ( "Retaining Wall "); and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer determined that the Retaining Wall is bulging and appears
to be in imminent state of failure; and
WHEREAS, to protect the public, City staff closed Island View Drive adjacent to the
Retaining Wall; and
WHEREAS, the structural integrity of the Retaining Wall is significantly compromised
such that it is hazardous and a danger to the health, safety, and welfare of the public using Island
View Drive and to surrounding property owners; and
WHEREAS, the structural integrity of the Retaining Wall must be restored immediately.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED pursuant to the powers granted to the City of
Mound by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 12.29 and 12.37, and Chapter 26 of the Mound City
Code, the City of Mound by and through its Mayor and City Council:
1. Declare the failing Retaining Wall to be a local emergency effective on July 22, 2014
and until the Retaining Wall along Island View Drive is replaced; and
2. Appoint the to be the director of the emergency management
organization and authorize that director to take all necessary and expedient measures
to immediately restore the Retaining Wall and continue to secure the area adjacent the
Retaining Wall.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound this 22nd day of July, 2014.
Mark Hanus, Mayor
Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
447303V2 RJR MU220 -4
7/22/14 Agenda Item #9 Additional Information
City Manager Handout Page 1 of 2
Definitions Related to "Sponsor" vs "Sanction"
Per Webster's Dictionary, and applied as understood by City Staff
July 22, 2014
A sponsor is defined, for these purposes, as a person or organization that pays for or plans and
carries out a project or activity. The Spirit of the Lakes organization is the sponsor of the Spirit
of the Lake Festival.
In 2012, the Centennial was a city sponsored event in that the city passed a resolution engaging
the Spirit of the Lakes to put on the Centennial, on its behalf, sealing the agreement with the
$6,500 allocation.
The annual budget allocation by the city to the Spirit of the Lakes ($1500) is a `level of
sponsorship' among all other supporters of the Spirit of the Lakes Festival.
The in -kind labor provided by city staff as a historically implied commitment —so sanctioned by
the city. Sanction synonyms are: authorization, clearance, concurrence, consent, greet light,
custom.
7/22/14 Agenda Item I/9 Additional Information
City Manager Handout Page 2 of 2
78 -121 LMCD charge based on slip length Set by LMCD
78 -121 Small watercraft slip fee $100.00 /yr
78 -121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (Villa of Lost Lake Residents) $1,148.00/yr
78 -121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (to Mound residents who are not
FIRE SERVICES:
Fire report (MFD Report) $10.00
30 -51 Burning Permit $10.00
30 -51 False Alarm (per calendar year) 1st $0.00
.2nd $0.00
3`d $50.00
4th $150.00
5th -10th $250.00
ea. over 10 $500.00
PARKS & RECREATION:
Depot rental - residents $125.00 /day
Depot rental - non - residents $250.00 /day
Damage deposit $350.00 plus $50.00 cash
Cancellation fee (depot) $75.00
City Hall /Centennial Building room rentals $75.00 /day
PUBLIC GATHERING:
50 -20 Parks or commons use fee: $300.00 - $600.00 /day
Damage Deposit $500.00 - $1,000.00 /day
Permit fee and damage deposit to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon
receipt of application stating specific use and requirements.
TAX FORFEIT AND /OR CITY -OWNED PROPERTY
Fee for staff review of request for
Lost Lake residents)
$1,950.00/yr.
78 -121
Lost Lake Slips Multiple (to Non -Mound residents or Lost
$500.00
POLICE SERVICES
Lake Residents for second slip)
$2,050.00 /yr
78 -121
Lost Lake Slips Multiple (After August 1st of the year)
$1,000 /yr
78 -121
LMCD Charge (based on sf of slip)
Set by LMCD
78 -121
Multiple Slip Refundable Key Deposit
$50.00
78 -123
Processing fee for full slip refund
$50.00
78 -123
Processing fee for voluntary suspension of license
$50.00
78 -123
Penalty for boat at slip after Fall deadline
$100.00
FIRE SERVICES:
Fire report (MFD Report) $10.00
30 -51 Burning Permit $10.00
30 -51 False Alarm (per calendar year) 1st $0.00
.2nd $0.00
3`d $50.00
4th $150.00
5th -10th $250.00
ea. over 10 $500.00
PARKS & RECREATION:
Depot rental - residents $125.00 /day
Depot rental - non - residents $250.00 /day
Damage deposit $350.00 plus $50.00 cash
Cancellation fee (depot) $75.00
City Hall /Centennial Building room rentals $75.00 /day
PUBLIC GATHERING:
50 -20 Parks or commons use fee: $300.00 - $600.00 /day
Damage Deposit $500.00 - $1,000.00 /day
Permit fee and damage deposit to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon
receipt of application stating specific use and requirements.
TAX FORFEIT AND /OR CITY -OWNED PROPERTY
Fee for staff review of request for
release of tax forfeit and /or city -owned land
$200.00
Escrow Deposit for above
$500.00
POLICE SERVICES
Administrative:
State Accident Report
$1.00
Police report: up to 5 single -sided pgs
$1.00
Addn'I pages, same report
$0.25 ea.
Drivers license check: non - resident
$1.00
Photographs: cost + reproduction, film
$25.00
Audio Cassette
$15.00
Video Cassette
$25.00
Finger printing: resident:
N/C
Non - resident:
$25,00