Loading...
2013-11-21 DCC Agenda PacketSSION STATEMENT: "The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides, at a reasonable Commission may postpone consideration of an application that is incomplete ana may for omer reasons postpone tmat action on an application. For each agenda item, the Commission will receive reports prepared by the City Staff, open the hearing to the public, and discuss and act on the application." NOTE- COMISSIONF.RS WILL BE CONTACTED BY STAFF PRIOR TO THE MEETINGS TO ASSESS ATTENDANCE. FAILURE TO RESPOND BY NOON ON THE DAY OF THE SCHEDULED MEETING WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ABSENCE AND MAY RESULT IN CANCELLATION OF THE MEETING DUE TO LACK OF A QUORUM. Please RSVP to Catherine Pausche @ 952- 472 -0633 or catherinepausche @cityofmound.com DOCK AND COMMONS COMMISSION AGENDA 7 :00 P.M. Meeting at Mound City Hall l Thursday, November 21, 2013 Page 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Approval of August 1 5 , 2013 Meeting Minutes 1 - 4 3. Comments and suggestions from citizens present (no more than 3 minutes allowed per speaker) 4. Dock Program Fees 5. In/Out RFQ Results 5 -6 7 -9 6. Public Lands Permit — 4633 Island View Drive 10-21 7. Proposed Changes — 2014 Dock Location Map Addendum 22 8. Shoreline Improvement Project 23 -27 9. Discussion: Possible Mound City Code Amendments n/a Chapter 66 - Waterways A. Multi -year dock license renewal options B. Require non - abutters to put docks in C. Side set -back requirements D. Restricting activity on or near launches E. Boat lift requirements 10. Reports: n/a - City Council Representative - Staff - Commissioners City Council Meeting Minutes are on line at www.cityofmound.com. If you would like a paper copy, please let us know and we will provide one to you. MOUND DOCKS AND COMMONS COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 16, 2013 The Mound Docks and Commons Commission met on Thursday, August 15, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Present: Chair Jim Funk, Commissioners Derrick Hentz, Susan Gardner, Rodney Beystrom, Council Representative Kelli Gillispie Excused: Vice Chair Mark Drahos Others Present: Director of Finance and Administration Catherine Pausche Public Present: Gina Smith Chair Jim Funk called meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. Approval of Agenda. MOTION by Funk, seconded by Beystrom, to approve agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 2. Approval of May 16, 2013 Meeting Minutes. MOTION by Hentz, seconded by Beystrom, to approve the minutes as written. Voting yes, Funk, Hentz, Gardner, Beystrom. Abstained, Gillispie. Motion carried. 3. Comments and Suggestions from Citizens Present: None 4a. 2014 Proposed Budget — Budget Summary Pausche reviewed the budget summary pages in the packet and stated that payroll allocations would be reduced to pre -2008 levels. Pausche stated the funding for inspections and park support remains the same. The other main variable expenses were tree trimming and capital improvements. Pausche stated she put a rip -rap project on hold until the funding mechanism could be determined. Pausche recommended the reduction in payroll allocations be accompanied by fee increases in order to fund an average of $50,000 in capital improvements a year. The commissioners reviewed the fee changes over the years and noted that, excluding the Lost Lake Slips, fees had stayed the same or were reduced since the last fee increase in 2005. 4b. 2014 Proposed Budget — Shoreline Inventory Project The amount of shoreline was briefly discussed and Pausche clarified it was not the intention to improve every bit of shoreline, it was just to demonstrate the potential scale of improvement projects and costs. Chair Jim Funk described the past involvement of the commission in shoreline evaluation. He stated the commissioners had done tours years ago of the shoreline based on the areas suggested by the previous Dock Administration, but mainly took the Staff's recommendations on what areas to improve. Pausche stated there was a request by the Mayor to have recommendations from the DCC on how to prioritize shoreline improvement projects. Pausche requested forming a sub - committee to do some site 4- visits with Staff in September and determine which shoreline should be visited by the entire commission. Chair Jim Funk and Derrick Hentz volunteered to serve on the subcommittee. Pausche stated another goal would be to develop the criteria to be used to prioritize the projects and that it must distinguish between aesthetics and "nice to have' vs. necessary and compelling from a safety /erosion standpoint. The Commission brainstormed some possible criterion, including: • Level of erosion /shore exposure to breaking waves due to open waters • Taking advantage of low water years for timing of projects • Safety considerations • Classification — Traversable /Non - Traversable.... how many would benefit? • Abutting owners willingness to share in expense Chair Jim Funk invited Gina Smith from the audience to address the Commission. Gina Smith, 4665 Island View Drive, stated her family has lived in their home since 1995 and her 100 feet of shoreline has never been improved since that time. She stated with the low and high water and ice shifts, everything on the shoreline continues on a downward slide. Three of four Cottonwood trees have their roots exposed and she would hope the City wants to preserve them. She said she has young children and there are safety concerns as the sharp rocks and exposed pipes are present throughout. Gina Smith showed the Commission 16 photos taken yesterday to demonstrate the problems. She stated that she has paid in over $7,000 to the dock program, pays higher taxes than non - abutting participants and maintains the commons shoreline in front of her property. Gina Smith asked that her property be included in the next rip -rap project along with the other properties that were approved last year (project since suspended). Pausche stated the first step will be to secure the funding by way of increased fees and then determine how to prioritize improvement projects. Pausche stated before getting started on the next project, Staff needs to be able to know the plan for the rest of the unimproved shoreline as it is anticipated many abutters will come forward requesting their shoreline be improved. She noted a recent request by a resident in Black Lake. 4c. 2014 Proposed Budget —Dock Program Fees Pausche reviewed the previous options considered for fee increases and stated the objective was to increase fees by approximately $30,000 overall to fund capital improvements, in addition to the surplus created by lower payroll allocations. Much discussion ensued about the pros and cons of higher or lower fees for shares, additional BSUs and multiple slips, in particular. Gillispie stated she likes the charge per foot for slips. She feels it will give flexibility down the road and that costs should be higher for larger boats. Funk stated that was the reasoning behind the 2011 recommendation. -z- Pausche stated the idea behind multiple slips was to reduce congestion and it needed to be attractive for non - abutters to give up their docks sites. Pausche noted there are less slip sights, so other fees need to be increased as well. Pausche noted concern with the complexity of charging by foot and potential problems with being to accommodate requests for moves. Pausche requested that the Commission make recommendations to the Council on how to increase revenue. She asked if anyone had any other suggestions besides the across the board increases and /or charging the slip length. Pausche stated the LMCD limits the number of watercraft to 5 per dock and that that is what is being enforced since there is not more restrictive language in our Ordinance. Pausche stated the only time requests for shares were declined was due to congestion. She said we also need to revisit dock configurations now that some complexes are getting quite wide, adding to congestion. The Commission agreed that rate increases should not be frequent and it is best to do it once. Pausche stated that she will be presenting different options for renewing the dock licenses and making longer term contracts, so it would be helpful for the fees not to be changing. Funk stated the Commission wanted to make the shares attractive to get more people into the program and give incentives to dock site holders to share. Pausche asked about why there was a freeze on shares and Funk stated because we were bumping up against the maximum BSU count. Funk stated they require the person sharing to be on the waiting list. Beystrom stated shares don't pay lakeshore taxes and the fee is very low to have lake access. Funk said this is about keeping the program affordable and not about market rates /value. Gillispie said but even at $400 it is still substantially lower than market. Beystrom and Gillispie support $250 for a share, and Funk said he feels that would reduce the incentive to bring more people in the program. Funk asked why make additional BSUs cheaper than shares as we want to promote shares so he would only support increasing shares $50. Hentz said as a slip owner, most slip rates would go up much higher (ranges from a reduction of $62 for a 16' to +$289 for a 35.5' slip) than the $25 or $50 increases being proposed for the other fees. MOTION by Funk, seconded by Gardner, to increase dock fees from $300 - $325, charge $18 per foot for slips, increase share fees from $150 to $200, and increase additional BSU fees from $75 to $150. Discussion ensued. Gillispie asked what that would generate, and Pausche stated $26,000. Gillispie said she would like dock sites at $350 and shares at $250. Hentz raised concerns slip site going up so high and questioned whether we could accommodate requests to change to smaller slips. Hentz said he prefers a flat increase for slips. Funk asked how many slips are underutilized and Pausche said many. Pausche said it is a concern if we can't accommodate down- sizing and that we try to keep people in their neighborhood. Funk asked if a grace period would alleviate. Hentz asked what if people 3- ask the City to shorten their current slip. Gillispie said keep in mind the big picture and the future and that change is necessary. Funk said beware of unintended consequences. Pausche stated concerns with making the program more complex in a time we are trying to reduce Staff time, pointed out that it is not a "business ", and we need to keep it simple and self- sufficient. Voting yes, Funk. Voting no, Gillispie, Gardner, Beystrom and Hertz. Motion failed. MOTION by Beystrom, seconded by Hentz, to increase dock fees from $300 - $350, increase slip fees from $350 - $400, increase share fees from $150 to $250, and increase additional BSU fees from $75 to $150. Voting yes, Beystrom. Voting no, Gillispie, Gardner, Funk and Hentz. Motion failed. MOTION by Gardner, seconded by Hentz, to increase dock fees from $300 - $350, increase slip fees from $350 - $400, increase share fees from $150 to $200, and increase additional BSU fees from $75 to $150. Voting yes, Gardner, Funk, and Hentz. Voting no, Gillispie and Beystrom. Motion carries. 5. Review: 2013 Calendar Pausche stated she does not anticipate a September meeting. No changes were made. 6. Reports City Council Representative: None. Staff: Pausche stated the LMCD will be moving into the building in September and City Hall will move to Public Safety in October, but all public meetings will continue to take place in the current Council Chambers. The Westonka Historical Society is doing quite well in the new location. Commissioners: None. MOTION by Funk, seconded by Gillispie, to adjourn at 8:57 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. -4- To: Docks and Commons Commissioners From: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administration Date: 11/13/2013 Re: 2014 Dock Program Fees Approved by City Council 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com The Mound City Council tentatively approved a $50 across the board increase to dock fees (excluding the Lost Lake Slips) at the August 20, 2013 Budget Workshop. This was essentially the same as the recommendation agreed to by a majority of the DCC commissioners at the August 15th DCC meeting. The only difference was that the DCC recommended a $75 increase for additional BSUs and the Council approved a $50 increase. The Council will approve the final dock fees at the December 10th City Council regular meeting when it approves both the 2014 budget and fee schedule. The proposed fee schedule changes are as follows: DOCKS: 78 -38 Commercial Boat (fee per boat) $30 /yr. 78 -56 Commercial Dock Renewal $500 /yr. Slips $30 ea/yr. Boats stored on land $10 ea/yr. 78 -76 Charter Boat License Fee Investigation Fee $100.00 78 -101 Non - refundable processing fee for wait list Application $20 /yr 78 -101 Processing fee for full dock refunds $50 78 -101 Late dock license application fee on or after March I" (abutters only) $50 1mo. 78 -101 Dock fee that includes Primary Watercraft (1 boat) $300/y r. $350(vr 78 -101 Each secondary Watercraft $73-ea-fyr-$125 /yr. 78 -101 Sailboat mooring $300/ye. $350 /vr 78 -103 Shared dock application - filed on or after March I't $25 78 -102 Temporary Visiting Dockage Permit - up to 21 days $50 78 -103 Shared dock application & 200/ LMCD charge (based on boat length) Set by LMCD LMCD charge (no boat) Min as set by LMCD 78 -104 Penalty fee for undeclared boat at dock $100 78 -121 Multiple Slip Fee $350/5T, 400/ r printed on recycled paper -5- 78 -121 LMCD charge based on slip length 78 -121 Small watercraft slip fee 78 -123 Processing fee for full slip refund 78 -123 Processing fee for voluntary suspension of license 78 -123 Penalty for boat at slip after Fall deadline 78 -104 Penalty for undeclared boat at a slip 78 -121 Lost Lake Multiple (Lost Lake Townhome Residents) 78 -121 LMCD Charge (based on sf of slip) 78 -121 Lost Lake Villa Multiple (to Mound/non - townhome residents) 78 -121 Lost Lake Villa Multiple (to Non -Mound residents /2nd slip Townhome Residents) 78 -121 LMCD Charge (based on sf of slip) 78 -121 Multiple Slip Refundable Key Deposit Set by LMCD F$125 /vr $50 $50 $100 $100 $1,148 /yr Set by LMCD $1,950 /yr. $2,050 /yr Set by LMCD $50 These fees will be reflected on the 2014 dock and slip license applications. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the fees. -6- MEMORANDUM Date: November 13, 2013 To: Docks and Commons Commissioners From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Subject: In/Out Request for Quote Results 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com The attached letter was issued to the potential contractors listed and we received two responses. Although the quotes were similar for the in/out service, Dock Masters of Lake Minnetonka, the previous provider for many years, was much more competitive on the price to adjust mid - season: FineLine Summary - $22 per section, $0 per mudplates, $15 per section for mid season adjustments DockMasters Summary - $20 per section, $3 per mud plate, $7 per section for mid - season adjustments. Staff recommends acceptance of the DockMasters proposal. printed on recycled paper -7- TO: Potential Contractor FROM: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administration DATE: October 4, 2013 RE: Dock In /Out Contract for 2014 & 2015 The City of Mound is seeking price quotes on a 2 year Contract for the In/Out of 286.5 Crepeau style dock sections. These dock systems must be installed prior to the Saturday before Memorial Day (May 24, 2014 and May 23, 2015) and be removed no sooner than October 15s' of the year. Location of dock systems noted on attached Citv of Mound Dock Program sheet. If the Selected Contractor fails to meet deadlines the City may hire another contractor to perform the work and forward all additional costs to the Selected Contractor. The Selected Contractor would also be held responsible for any dock materials damaged from lack of performance (Example: ice damaged dock due to lake freezing.). The City of Mound retains the right to add or delete In/Out from the 286.5 listed dock sections and the contactor agrees to charge or credit for additional or subtracted dock sections as quoted below. The potential contractor must provide a proof of general liability and workers compensation insurance that meets the requirements on the attached schedule. The Selected Contractor must also have the ability to provide needed dock materials at a reasonable cost as needed to complete dock installation. Examples are pipe, bumpers, mud plates and other pertinent items. Additionally, the Selected Contractor will be responsible for inspecting the "No In/Out Required" docks noted on the attached City of Mound Dock Program sheet and make adjustments and repairs as needed if approved by the City. 1) Per 8' Section In /Out Each: $ x 286.5 Sections Total = $ Note Mid -Year Dock Adjustment Per 8" Section if needed $ each. 2) Per Individual Mud Plate WOut Each: Approximately 172 Mud Plates. All quotes are due back to the City of Mound no later than 3pm on October 22, 2013. This contract will be in effect for the years of 2014 and 2015. Contractor Signature Contractor Please feel free to contact me at (952)472 -0633 or via email at catherinepausche @cityofmound.com with questions. -8- Mailing List for Dock In/Out Niccum Docks 2672 Southeast Eastwood Ave. Buffalo, MN 55313 Fineline Lakeshore Service P.O. Box 626 Mound, MN 55364 Dock & Lift 4550 Shoreline Blvd Spring Park, MN 55384 Dock Masters 285 Crestview Ave. Long Lake, MN 55356 Lakeshore Dock & Boat Lift Service PO Box 35 Navarre, MN 55392 Locations: Amhurst, Avalon, Beachside, Centerview, Devon, Fairview, Highland, Scherven Park, Bluebird, Dove, Eagle, Finch, Gull, Mound Bay Park, Twin Park, Waterbury, and Woodland. -9- r t� CITY 4F MOUNO!— PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 5341 Maywood Road 77:: : Mound, MN 55364 r PUBLIC LANDS REPORT TO: Docks and Commons Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: October 15, 2013 SUBJECT: Public Lands Permit Application APPLICANT: James Kuehn LOCATION: 4633 Island View Drive REQUEST: City Code Section 62 -11 regulates use of public lands in the City of Mound and states that construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park, or commons, is unlawful unless a special construction on public lands permit is issued. The applicant, James Kuehn, is requesting a Public Lands Permit to replace an existing stairway on the Commons abutting the property located at 4633 Island View Drive due to deterioration. The proposed replacement stairway is to be constructed in the same location as the existing structure. The existing landing located near the bottom of the staircase is being retained. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments for review and comment. Written comments received to date are summarized below: Building Official Scott Qualle. No comments other than a Building Permit will be required. Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson. Homeowner will need to call for Gopher State One Call locates as there are public utilities running through the area of the current stairway. These utilities will need to be shown on a revised survey to be submitted as part of the building permit review process. City Attorney Melissa Manderschied. No concerns. -10- Sarah Smith, Community Development Director 1. The City's shoreland regulations are contained in City Code Section 129- 385. Specifically, regulations for stairways, lifts and landings are contained in City Code Section 129 -385 (d) (2) (c). In summary, stairways for residential properties in shoreland areas are permitted as long as they do not exceed four (4) feet in width. Also, landings up to 32 square feet are allowed for residential properties in shoreland areas. Members are advised that the stairs are proposed to be 3.6 feet in width. The existing landing is being retained. 2. No clear cutting; selective cutting only subject to approval by the Public Works Superintendent with activities to be consistent with the City Code including Mound's shoreland regulations. Applicant is directed to contact Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson. 3. As applicable, no filling or grade alteration at or below 931.5 elevation is allowed unless a separate floodplain alteration permit is approved by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. A grading permit will be required for the annual movement of more than ten (10) cubic yards in shore impact zones. Applicant is directed to contact Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson for determination whether a grading permit will be required. 4. Appropriate sediment and erosion control measures must be maintained on site until such time as vegetation has been established and /or subject area has been properly restored. Applicant to coordinate involved erosion control activities with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District including the need for permitting for the project. ADDITIONAL COMMENT The application is being forwarded to the City Council for consideration without Docks and Commons Commission (DCC) recommendation because its October meeting was cancelled and because the replacement project is minor in nature; also because of seasonal issues. In the event DCC review is needed, the Council, at its option, may remand the request to the Docks Commission for review at its meeting scheduled for November 21st. SITE INSPECTION Council members are encouraged to visit the site prior to the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this permit with conditions noted above including, but not limited to, comments from Staff, required permitting and construction of the proposed stairway to meet the requirements of the building code and zoning ordinance. -11- Attachment Excerpts from City Code Sec. 129 -385 (d) (2) (c) Shoreland Regulations - Stairways / Lifts and Landings C. Stairways, lifts, and landings. Stairways and lifts are the preferred alternative to major topographic alterations for achieving access up and down bluffs and steep slopes to shore areas. Stairways and lifts must meet all of the following design requirements: 1. Stairways and lifts must not exceed four feet in width on residential lots. Wider stairways may be used for commercial properties, public open -space recreational properties, and planned development areas. 2. Landings for stairways and lifts on residential lots must not exceed 32 square feet in area. Landings larger than 32 square feet may be used for commercial properties, public open space recreational properties, and planned development areas. 3. Canopies or roofs are not allowed on stairways, lifts, or landings. 4. Stairways, lifts, and landings may be either constructed above the ground on posts or pilings, or placed into the ground, provided they are designed and built in a manner that ensures control of soil erosion. 5. Stairways, lifts, and landings must be located in the most visually inconspicuous portions of lots, as viewed from the surface of the public water assuming summer, leaf - on conditions, whenever practical. 6. Facilities such as ramps, lifts, or mobility paths for physically handicapped persons are also allowed for achieving access to shore areas; provided that they comply with the dimensional and performance standards of subsections (d)(2)c,l through 5 of this section in addition to the requirements of Minn. Rules ch. 1340. 12- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 13- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FROM JAMES KUEHN FOR PROPERTY AT 4633 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE WHEREAS, the applicant, James Kuehn, who owns the property at 4633 Island View Drive, is requesting a Public Lands Permit to replace the existing staircase located on Devon Commons; and WHEREAS, Section 62 -11, requires City Council approval by a majority vote for construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park or commons; and WHEREAS, details regarding the request are contained in the Public Lands Permit Report dated October 15, 2013; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the Public Lands Permit application subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered this request at their meeting of Tuesday, October 22, 2013; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve the Public Lands Permit as requested with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of all required permitting to undertake the project, including but not limited to, a building permit 2. As part of building permit review, the applicant shall be required to submit a revised survey which shows the location of the public utilities in Devon Commons. 3. Prior to project start, the applicant shall be required to meet with the Public Works Superintendent due to the location of public utilities that are in the vicinity of the current stairway; also the need for a grading permit. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for contacting the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to determine the need for a MCWD Rules Permit(s). 5. The new steps shall meet the provisions of the City Code in all regards. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of October, 2013. Mayor Mark Hanus, Mayor Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk 13- AM 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952472 -0600 Fax 962472 -0620 Parks and Open Space Commission Date DISTRIBUTION • r 0 Date Received City Council Date Parks Director Are Me Public Works Other Check One (J+ kti* ❑ CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLILAND PERMIT —new construction. NOTE: NO PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUSES OR OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND - City Code Section 62 -11(a) & (b). PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT — to allow repairs to an existing structure - City Code Section 62- 11(c). ❑ CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE — to allow an existing encroachment to remain in an "as is" condition - City Code Section 62- 11(g). ❑ LAND ALTERATION — change in shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, fill, etc. - City Code Section 62- 11(d). The structure or work you are requesting is an activity on publicly owned lands. Structures like boat houses, patios, sheds, etc. are all NONCONFORMING USES. It is the intent of the City to bring all these uses into conformance, which means that those structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. All permits are granted for a limited time and are non - transferable. Stairway construction must meet the State Building Code when the permit is for new construction, or a new permit is applied for due to a change in dock site holder. Please Woe or orint Isaibly APPLICANT Name Tame-5 l`ta Email ik�",5;- 4ktc.. �CYS�2cpc� //al, Address �� ! S (et cLV(ev✓ ��r �l r �`%l� _lffoyr�t 9S'2 °237 -26Y Q1� (M) Phone (H) (W) ABUTTING Address b v w d: HOL/kct PROPERTY Lot % !� �Z c f I_e- ¢ f Block _ LEGAL DESC. Subdivision X./C%"P 1 PID # Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 B1 B2 B3 (Cirde one) Public Lands Permit Application Page 1 of 2 Revised 111812013 -14- A PUBLIC Name e7e uv e t Lo m Keyl S Email PROPERTY {{tt Dock Site # Shoreline Type Ale v, — 'i`mVtvra (itp CONTRACTOR Name Ke-ov ��LC.Email / Address ( to d ✓ ,-LJ Ov No L1 P+ Phone�+l2,71C�-�Z`la( A FEE OF $200.00 APPLIES IF VALUATION OF PROJECT EXCEEDS $1,000.00 AND NO PUBLIC BENEFIT IS DERIVED. PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS) $ y Date It LZ / z Public Lands Permit Application Page 2 of 2 Revised 111812013 -15- mail.aol. con✓ 3807& iii/ aol- 6/en-us /mail/PrintMessage.aspx 111 -16- P' y�r ry :1 "3 0 4 c�S x 74 C6 _17 v � y 0 41 .� w es�x— X10 ����i ��� ���u -19- 20- — —�� X95T.8 A +ISLAND VIEW�-DRIYE N% N44'46'32 "E° 4r pnzs -- — 74.93 -- - _ PROPOSED N ���� a zDS . GARAGE +saA N, 26 ___z0s___ ro BITUMINOUS SURFACE ` Po iCZ 952 s \\ D 1Y96? EDGE OF BIT. m OGO nr�eEx 8.3 o E 60.0 9 83 u, O1 w 13.2 '. s0 iD.O Z 8.4 \rnDV7 I N WF0\ Ln cx Ln N Cn N Q \Ej N S 954 I O\ rn O 24.5 13.3 DECK f I, DECK r_ m SPA UNOEn CONSTRUCnM j \ N_ ______ ______1 L - -74.69 — S 44'46'31 � Existing stairs on commons to be replaced F\ F- 11 N I / A A A A n N I �(� h;� 1{ X S/ ��'r<1v�✓1 V L_, V U I V I V I I V I V I V PP Dy ��CATIOIA CaUNT(EMAP ��� MINNETONKA FROM -21- FUTV C#JtM11V01 Date: November 13, 2013 To: Docks and Commons Commissioners From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director/Clerk/Treasurer Subject: Dock Location Map Changes Proposed for 2014 ' ff,, 1) Change Dock Site #TW 03901 Abutting Address to 2152 Ashland Lane 2) Remove Dock site—NIP #11077 Was supposed to be removed for 2013, but slipped in the transition. 3) Modify Slip site —TP 14660 (Lakeside) This is a straight dock (aprox 50'), so limit to 2 boats. 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com 4) Remove Slip site — EIP 5644 -H (Scherven Park) This is on the inside of the slip (on straight section to multiples). There is insufficient room to navigate between the boat in the outside slip and the neighbors. This slip can also be subject to low water. Person assigned for 2013 did not use, and was new in 2013, so they will be restored to wait list. printed on recycled paper -22- BuTffurr#TTVK 1 Date: November 13, 2013 To: Docks and Commons Commissioners From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Subject: Shoreline Improvement Project Study 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PK (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cilyofmound.com At the August 15, 2013, DCC meeting, shoreline improvements were discussed and Chair Jim Funk and Commissioner Derrick Hentz volunteered to participate in a shoreline improvements study with dock administration staff. The City Council requested a sub - committee be formed to determine a way to prioritize shoreline improvement projects. On September 27, 2013, the sub - committee members toured the shoreline by boat. A booklet of pictures taken on that day was prepared by Jim Funk and has been given to DCC commissioners. The following criterion was used to differentiate the quality of shoreline and need for improvement: • Level of erosion /shore exposure to breaking waves due to open waters • Safety considerations /traversability /debris • Storm water management implications Much of the shoreline has been improved over the years, either funded privately or by the dock program. Exhibit A summarizes the contiguous shoreline that has abutting and non - abutting sites and excludes wetlands and solely multiple slip sites. This shoreline is split into three groups: • Group A: Higher exposure to erosion based on bay /location (5,422 LF) • Group B: Lower exposure to erosion based on bay /location (8,521 LF) • Group C: Improved in conjunction with street project or by dock program (6,774 LF) The sub - committee toured shoreline in all three categories to get a feel for the range of quality of shoreline. It was agreed that Group A (Phelps Bay and Cooks Bay) is exposed to more wave activity /erosion than the areas listed in Group B. printed an recycled paper -23- Assuming approximately $30,000 - $50,000 per year would be available to fund shoreline improvement projects; it would take approximately 8 —10 years to improve Group A shoreline. A project was approved in 2012 for four properties in Group A on Island View Drive. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approved the permits and the vendor is willing to honor the original quote at $70 per linear foot. Because these properties fall within Group A, and have ratings of 2and 3, the subcommittee recommends completing the project in 2014. Future projects will be determined based on contiguous shoreline and relative ratings per Exhibit B described below. Exhibit B prioritizes the shoreline in the East Island Park Area (EIPA) for future project planning. An original rating was established by the former dock administration staff in 2011 and those ratings were updated this past fall. Ratings are classified as follows: 1 Exposed roots and soil /steep incline 2 Exposed roots and soil /smaller rocks /redrock /old materials 3 Aged /improperly installed rock & miscellaneous materials 4 Smaller rock but newer /dense 5 Boulders replaced within last 10- 12 years with fabric for erosion control Staff will get bids annually for 500 — 700 LF of shoreline improvements for contiguous properties with ratings between 1 and 3. Staff will also weigh areas with storm sewer outfalls as higher priority as the storm sewer fund pays for a portion of the project. In addition, the City is required to reduce the amount of phosphorus and other pollutants entering Lake Minnetonka. Dock administration staff asks that the DCC commissioners take action on whether or not to recommend this approach to shoreline improvement to the City Council. Please let Catherine know if you have any additional questions at (952)472 -0633 or via email at catherinepausche @cityofmound.com. Thank you. -24- EXHIBIT A - City of Mound Dock Program Contiguous Shorline with Abutting and Non- Abbutting Sites (Excludes "E" Wetland Shoreline and Slips Only) Total LF 6,774 25- Year # Dock Average Code Ln Ft Start Ln Ft End Footage Location / Replaced Sites Type Class Bay LF /Site Group A: Higher Exposure to Erosion Based on Bay /Location EIPA 5503 9270 3767 Scherven /Pembroke /Devon (IVD) 84 S /A/N B/C Phelps 45 WIP 4100 5755 1655 Brighton Blvd 34 A/N D /CIA Cooks 49 Total LF 5,422 @ 851F 8 - 10 years Group B: Lower Exposure to Erosion Based on Bay /Location LL 3559 4432 873 Lost Lake Park Docks (Bartlett/Lost 1 8 A/N D Lost Lake 109 NIP 10947 11231 284 Denbigh 2 A D Black Lake 142 NIP 10008 10737 729 Stratford Lane - Denbigh Road 7 A/N D Black Lake 104 NIP 3338 3885 547 Incl. Longford Rd /Kildare 13 A C Black Lake 42 NIP 6011 7526 1515 Kildare /Black Lake Ln /Carlow 15 A/N D Black Lake 101 NIP 8937 9635 698 Excelsior - Carlow, Shannon, Cavan, 22 A/N D Black Lake 32 SH 2913 2955 42 Inwood 1 N D Seton Channel 42 SH 3657 3694 37 Avon 1 N D Seton Channel 37 SH 4889 4987 98 Emerald 1 N D Seton Channel 98 TH 5989 7178 1189 Lagoon Park 4 N D Priests 297 TH 4938 5098 160 Ridgewood 6 N D Priests 27 TH 3864 4052 188 Highland 10 S/A D Priests 19 TP 3656 3689 33 Bluebird 1 N Jennings 33 TP 13351 13397 46 ?13574 Shorewood Ln 1 N D Jennings 46 P 19125 19169 44 Wren 1 N D Harrisons 44 TP 3769 3899 130 Canary 2 A/N D Jennings 65 TP 12280 12342 62 Beachside N 2 N D Jennings 31 TP 3305 3395 90 Avocet 3 N D Jennings 30 TP 8433 9085 652 3PTS 5 N D Jennings 130 TP 7598 7843 245 Pebble Beach 6 A/N A Jennings 41 TW 5033 5387 354 1 A D Harrisons 354 TW 1910 1954 44 Villa 1 N D Harrisons 44 TW 2122 2166 44 Overland 1 N D Harrisons 44 TW 6139 6170 31 Chateau 1 N D Harrisons 31 TW 8442 8518 76 Arbor 1 N D Harrisons 76 TW 5472 5608 136 3 A/N D Harrisons 45 TW 5721 5895 174 Fairview 6 A/S D Harrisons 29 Total LF 8,521 Group C: Improved in Conjunction with Street Proiect or by Dock Program TH 1679 1782 103 Idlewood XXXX 2 N D Cooks 52 TH 3126 3224 98 Twin Park XXXX 4 N D Priests 25 TP 16313 18756 2443 Crescent 2002 15 N D 163 TP 19227 20605 1378 Wiota 2011 34 A/N D 41 TW 592 1338 746 Waterbank 2004 19 N D 39 TW 2360 4366 2006 Centerview/Waterside Centerview /O 36 N /S /A D 56 Total LF 6,774 25- EXHIBIT B - Devon Commons Shoreline Ratings 2013 Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Abutting/ Non- AbuttinLy Commons Name Site Number Footage 2011 Rating A Devon 05687 43 5 X A Devon 05742 55 5 X A lDevon 105801 59 21/2-3 X A Devon 05851 50 21/2-3 X A Devon 05901 50 21/2-3 X A Devon 05951 50 3-4 X A Devon 06002 51 3 - 4 X A Devon 106052 50 3-4 X A Devon 06102 50 3 X A Devon 06152 50 3 X A Devon 06227 75 2 X A Devon 06339 112; A Devon 06455 116 A Devon 06563 108 3 X A Devon 06656 93 3 X A Devon 06740 84 3 X A Devon 06815 75 3 X N Devon 06861 46 5 X A Devon 06895 34 5 X A Devon 06929 34 5 X A Devon 06963 34 5 X A Devon 07013 50 5 X A Devon 07060 47 5 X A Devon 07107 47 4 1 X A Devon 107154 47'3' X A Devon 07204 50 1 OR 2 X A Devon 07254 50 2 X A Devon 07304 50 4 X A Devon 07354 50 5 X A Devon 07404 50 21/2-3 X A Devon 107452 48 2 X A IDevon 07527 75 2-21/2 X A Devon 07612 85 1 - 2 X -26- EXHIBIT B - Devon Commons Shoreline Ratings 2013 Rating 1 2 3 4 5 Abutting/ Non- Abutting Commons Name Site Number Footage 2011 Rating A Devon 07734 122 2 X A Devon 07804 70 4 X A 1Devon 107882 78 21/2-3 X A Devon 07953 71 3 X A Devon 08013 60 5 X A Devon 08073 60 5 X A Devon 08233 160 5 X A Devon 08273 40 5 X A Devon 08338 65 5 X A Devon 08433 95 5 X A Devon 08493 60 2 1 X A Devon 108553 60 11/2-2 X A lDevon 08598 45 5 X A Devon 08648 50 5 X A Devon 08688 40 5 X A Devon 08728 40 5 1 1 X A Devon 08793 65 3 X A Devon 108866 73 4 X A Devon 08939 73 4 X A Devon 09014 75 3 X A Devon 09054 40 3 X A Devon 09094 40 3 X A I IDevon 109180 186 5 X A I Devon 09240 60 5 X Total Shoreline 3553 LF Average Shoreline 62 LF RATING KEY: I Exposed roots and soil /roots /steep incline 1 1 12 20_ 9 15 Proposed 2014 Project 2 Exposed roots and soil/smaller rocks/redrock/old materials 3 Aged/improperly installed rock & miscellaneous materials 4 Smaller rock but newer /dense 5 Boulders replaced within last 10- 12 years with fabric for erosion control -27- MOUND DOCKS AND COMMONS COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 17, 2013 The Mound Docks and Commons Commission met on Thursday, January 17, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Present: Chair Jim Funk, Vice Chair Mark Drahos, Commissioners Susan Gardner, Rodney Beystrom, Cliff Schmidt, Council Representative Kelli Gillispie Excused: N/A Others Present: Director of Finance and Administration Catherine Pausche, City Manager Kandis Hanson Public Present: N/A Chair Jim Funk called meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. 1. Approval of Agenda. MOTION by Schmidt, seconded by Drahos, to approve agenda as written. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 2. Election of Officers. MOTION by Drahos, seconded by Gardner to nominate Funk as Chair. All voted in favor. Motion carried. MOTION by Funk, seconded by Schmidt, to nominate Drahos as Vice Chair. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3. Approval of Agenda. MOTION by Schmidt, seconded by Drahos, to approve agenda as written. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Rodney Beystrom arrived at 7:03pm 4. Oath of Office — Mark Drahos City Manager Kandis Hanson swore -in Mark Drahos as Docks and Commons Commissioner. City Manager Update. Hanson gave an update on Mound Magic meetings and redevelopment projects. Drahos asked if Jim Fackler's position will be refilled. Hanson stated that the position will be absorbed with Catherine Pausche taking over Docks Administration with the assistance of Ron Stanchfield and CSO Mike Wocken. Gardner asked how the police transition is going and Hanson stated it is going very well. 6. Approval of August 27, 2012 meeting minutes. MOTION by Beystrom, seconded by Gardner, to approve the minutes of August 27, 2012. Four voted in favor. Funk and Gillispie abstained due to absence. Motion carried. 7. Comments and suggestions from citizens present: None. 8. Review: 2012 Dock Final Report /BSU Count Funk said turnover seemed higher than in the past. Beystrom asked if Mound residents will have first opportunity on the Villa slips. Pausche stated the Ordinance amendment was passed changed the priority and the number of slips available will be split to make half available to Mound residents for $1,600 and half to open market for $2,600. Pausche said the remaining Villa lots sold and there will be less homes than originally planned. The developer has asked that the slips be assigned to the lots and Pausche will develop a proposal for the DCC to consider. Beystrom asked if there is a deadline for the wait list and Pausche stated, yes, they are due by February 28`h as well. Pausche stated that 80 letters were written in 2012 but no fines were assessed. Pausche stated this will be a year of learning, but is committed to keeping up the level of customer service. At the same time, enforcement and treating people equally will be emphasized. 9. Review: 2012 Preliminary Financials Pausche emphasized closing entries still have to take place. There were no major projects in 2012. Pausche will bring back the long term capital plan at another meeting. 10. Review: 2013 Budget /Capital Outlay /Fees Major change in 2013 is the change in the Villa fees for non -Villa residents and that the surplus Villa revenue will go to debt service on the dump bonds. The Villa escrows will continue to be funded at the same rate. Docks fund a portion of the Parks capital budget. There are no capital projects for the Dock program. The In /Out service has been set. 11. Review: 2013 Dock Location Map Addendum No questions or comments were raised. 12. Review: 2013 Calendar March will be the lottery and the financial annual report. Pausche will bring forward change requests and if anything is urgent, will request a February meeting. 13. Discuss: 2013 Program Change Requests Pausche said a number of requests have been received already and time is needed to research and evaluate. N 14. Reports City Council Representative: Kelli Gillispie stated Westonka Animal Hospital will be moving to Mound Marketplace. The Council will be appointing a replacement for David Osmek's vacated seat. Staff: Commissioners: Commissioner Cliff Schmidt submitted his resignation effective immediately. His family is moving to their home in Florida. Pausche stated the Council appoints the Dock Commissioner, but the DCC makes a recommendation. MOTION by Funk, seconded by Schmidt, to adjourned at 7:56 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. N Docks and Commons Commission March 21, 2013 ' • NAME OF CANDIDATE CHOICE # Bill Stone Pat Buffington Derrick Hentz CHOICE #: 1 — First Choice; 2 — Second Choice; etc. The secretary will collect the ballots and total the choice points. The Candidate with the least amount of points is your choice. Initials 0 Applicant: Bill Stone Page 1 of 3 APPLICANT INFORMATION VOLUNTEER COMMISSIONS Please use black ink or type. Date: February 18, 2013 Name of Commission: Docks and Commons Commission Personal Information: Name: Bill Stone Address: 2760 Commerce Blvd. #308, Mound MN 55364 Telephone: Home: 952-220-7046 Work: 952-215-3824 Email Address: bills @ba- corp.com (work) Place of Employment: Broadband America Corp 1772 Stieger Lake Lane, Victoria, MN 55386 1. Please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this commission. I am a mature, responsible adult with a strong desire to make Mound a better place to live. I have enjoyed the use of Minnesota lakes all my life and have a great sense of appreciation for the pleasure they provide and the value they bring to a community. I have over 40 years of business experience that I can bring to the position. I want to make a positive contribution to the City where I live and feel that serving on this committee would be a great way to give of my time and talents. 2. What skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this commission? My forty year business career has been primarily in the area of sales and business development. In both disciplines, I've learned to: view situations openly; ask questions to uncover needs /opportunities; listen carefully to responses; evaluate the information provided; seek and propose reasonable solutions to the stated needs; conduct post -sale satisfaction surveys (to ensure that adopted solutions work and expectations are met). It's a continuous process and there are seemingly endless ways to make things better. That said, however, I wouldn't change things that are working well but rather focus my attention on areas that are perceived as problematic or in need of an obvious upgrade. I would approach serving on the committee in much the same way. N Applicant: Bill Stone Page 2 of 3 From a work perspective, I believe it doing the best I can. I am open- minded, personable and unbiased. I'm ethical and fair. I believe in team efforts and work harmoniously with others. I address problems methodically and like to "plan my work and work my plan". I always maintain a positive attitude and enjoy helping others. 3. With what you know about the Mound area, what do you see as the three most significant issues this commission will need to address in the next two years? Prior to the interview to take place on March 21 st, I plan to contact the other commissioners to gain insight on their perspectives. (Having served on the Committee they are undoubtedly much more aware of the issues then I am.) I also plan to speak with fellow residents (boaters) to learn of improvements that they would like to see taking place in the program. Three issues (and more) that I envision are: Issue #1: Too few docks and slips to meet the current and future demand. Proposed Solution: work with the DNR and other regulatory bodies exploring ways to expand the number of available mooring places for boats (if possible) ... perhaps some docks could be lengthened to support more boats or reconfigured or the inventory expanded. Perhaps property owners that use common docks that abut their properties could be persuaded (compensated) to allow unused dock spaces to be leased to others. Issue #2: Unauthorized or underutilized use of docks and slips. Proposed Solution: Make certain that all docks and slips are used in accordance to their intended use and per the rules and regulations in effect. All sides of every rented dock should be used (unused sides should be made available to others ... that alone might help to reduce those on the waiting list). Information collected from users needs to be verified in- season. Penalties for misuse or abuse might need to include loss of privileges. Issue 43: Unsafe structural condition of docks and slips. Proposed Solution: Visually inspect each dock for safety and correct as needed. Issue #4: How to make Mound a more popular boaters' destination: Proposed Solution: Seek out and incentivize businesses that cater to the boating public such as a water accessible restaurantibar. Such an enterprise might work well to promote the City and attract other businesses. Sufficient access and docking will need to be available. (Perhaps the vacant VFW could be revitalized and slips created behind it) N Applicant: Bill Stone Page 3 of 3 4. What one or two contributions do you think you would make, in the short term (first few months) and in the long term (after a year)? Short term: 1) Create a forum to solicit input/ideas from the boating community we serve (if it's not already being done). 2) Analyze the use of docks and slips to see if utilization can be optimized (e.g. determine sides of docks that are not being used that could be rented to others). 3) Mark which docks in Lost Lake are available to the public for visiting boaters. 4) Improve security at Lost Lake slips where break -ins have occurred. Long term: 1) Find ways to increase supply to meet demand for mooring. 2) Find ways to make downtown Mound attractive as a "boaters' destination ". 5. Please fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this commission. I am currently on the wait list for a boat slip or dock. To be eligible, candidates must be available on the interview on Thurs, March 21, 2013. Please return by 4:30, Weds, March 13, 2013, to: Catherine Pausche City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 catherinepausche @cityofmound.com Fax: 952-472-0633 Drop in door or box at City Hall N Please use black ink or type. Date: 2 // z Ll .�i I. I V #. I i ULU R WO IV Do 01 O Applicant: Pat Buffington Page 1 of 2 Name of Commission: City of Mound Docks and Commons Commission Personal Information: Address: U i S" (, Z�J in �L �cc- it Telephone: Home - f 'L — 6m0c, — 7 7--:-7 Work: Email Address: Place of S (a' C?An.:` Current Dock Site: Number of Years in Program: Z4� 1. Please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this commission. :..r e//4 YeuJ (( / d0.k�y v4iS'S r�•`''p� ;�it� �1�`,S T �a.G L,. °�. /�'.(�n ✓" c cn.: -7 (a rsc�5 .SucC ( II t ,. ✓ l L'Iay r -t7� y4 —O $ cx- (J ^> ��, e R 7't' -� ✓ ! / /2 /r'GC.y' cc. <' (` �� rs� c/i( l �C--r, CX 5' 7 2. What skills and abilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this commission? n riv., s' {t `' -.� f' L;4 :�7r�W1;;AYy 'w t�ac,..y t•_.: G i��/ _.ly �1�ii�1 WB;r y'� �'af�:NU9%^Cfl— �;, .eJP.l y' ���{'i -i KJ ��.d YS ,h13 ✓✓o r:1a° C�t,tn wn�Y -•. -.1 �. ^.:.7 o d tr a "-\ n,,vq a r 2 n r 14 ` , 11 F 36 1�' -e fir, >F A�ff �4-) a � x�a N Applicant: Pat Buffington Page 2 of 2 3. With what you know about the Mound Dock Program, what do you see as the three most significant issues this commission will need to address in the next two years? r`f l ( ✓���. !3 i`o (F Y"a�wt� �l: �O- -6l'c . 6'✓�9 CVl � 1 J ik3 n ✓ -. ^.L0. J �ro 51 ��.J/ _�Y'r.�% aC%�" �C [7 C �-^C' C�a t'K c � � E 1 ^� (-in � � G^��^�.. �` ✓`. o ;aJ % (Wr�V:sJe 011 rT, 4. What one or two contributions do you think you would make, in the short term (first few months) and in the long term (after a year)? films.+ -.�eC Gi e+e ?c. '�J .toff fci :2h j e-M C'o rcC�e r'rtq �J,n s� •,C �v.a n:;..i ^y i,a /'A i,s , �c.( es v..t �`,� m.nn. rv. :A.�'✓�^�.''" /- �cv> µ�° °i \ °3�: s de 9i' Cr- �;'!'ro v+, �✓J^�'P / ='•Vj +.r `` { t3 -`_,. Yi1 t r Ca:Nt1Pb'i�rS,ov;'�ryJ' ✓ � r Ja 'J' Y 5. Please fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this commission. i Nlp C 6 � 0 1"e- -<; To be eligible, candidates must be available on the interview on Thurs, Feb 21, 2013. Please return by 4:30, Tues, Feb 12, 2013, to: Catherine Pausche City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952)472 -0633 catherinepausehe @cityofmound.com Fax: (952) 472-9720 Drop in door or box at City Hall Applicant: Derrick Hentz nA Page 1 of 2 __ WL... APPLICANT INFORMATION VOYJI7N EER COYMSSIONS Please use black ink or type. Name of Commission. City of Mound Docks and Commons Commission Persom Telephone: 'Home; �5 ' ! (� 0 5 Work: Email Address: d4eo i' Place of Employmen/tp Current Dock Site: t.e.k� ew )J d c) -To 0A, 70C Number of "Years in Program: 1. Please describe work, volunteer, or life experience that you have had that would prepare you for being a member of this commission. 154C (96)00_e>)tOG � f �j,,C � ,/ �T1" i4v- 2. What skills and at commission? 4,4rmer ` Ile 1,9v M1155i'sr4 )ilities do you have that would be helpful in doing the work of this �O54C i per'aNGtS (10A's uwj aaµk��� G�rciSfa✓1s �a6i`c� w��I¢ w�Y All j rcS;Jen 5 0 gwd, E ZO /TO 39Vd 003W aIN08iQ3W 18ETPT969L T9 :9T ETOZ /ZT /ZO 4, What one or two contributions do you think you would make, in the short term (first few months) and in the long term (after a year)? e\ 6,- 1- wc.5 Ph A. e.j t/ C9v!?rYt i`S\S�D Vt 1 .L ash t'.cwv. %i �o-r t✓i ]-� WLA+ I's E+,Pe,:1eJ �IOvv1 a.. �'O wl,vjlr�St�rsI.74�, iw,ty N�yj (on w�1 proGG�vPE f�✓� �h no'P *, r'. dR a�l W+a -i TCa pet, RI✓)t�,��- 7`te 1��"o�rs dam. 5. Please fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this commission. kori& , -1 U ','" a wart,- p( To be eligible, candidates must be available on the interview on Thurs, Feb 21, 2013. Please return by 4:30, Tues, Feb 12, 2013, to: Catherine Pausche City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952)472.0633 catherinepausche @cityofmound.com Fax: (952) 472 -9720 Drop in door or box at City Hall ZO /Z0 39dd 003W OIN081Q3W T8£TPTS£9L TG:9T £TOZ /ZT /Z0 Applicant: Derrick Hentz Page 2 of 2 3. With what you know about the Mound Dock Program, what do you see as the three most significant issues this commission will need to address in the next two years? IIT auto IUT aVvIj Ke O'qc C„ 146D� /6Vee. G,I WA/ ry rAM 'o i"h.(C 114o;kt, `d'� 6k4e,t" f Cuf"i✓1� J�rSu['S Cr'4 �I92 !,?fn2f�rljs6�d� rJc- eXtefl, � Jeeq'291POo S u:�t}c/ Duilf 'AKke 64 4, What one or two contributions do you think you would make, in the short term (first few months) and in the long term (after a year)? e\ 6,- 1- wc.5 Ph A. e.j t/ C9v!?rYt i`S\S�D Vt 1 .L ash t'.cwv. %i �o-r t✓i ]-� WLA+ I's E+,Pe,:1eJ �IOvv1 a.. �'O wl,vjlr�St�rsI.74�, iw,ty N�yj (on w�1 proGG�vPE f�✓� �h no'P *, r'. dR a�l W+a -i TCa pet, RI✓)t�,��- 7`te 1��"o�rs dam. 5. Please fully disclose any potential conflicts of interest you may have serving on this commission. kori& , -1 U ','" a wart,- p( To be eligible, candidates must be available on the interview on Thurs, Feb 21, 2013. Please return by 4:30, Tues, Feb 12, 2013, to: Catherine Pausche City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952)472.0633 catherinepausche @cityofmound.com Fax: (952) 472 -9720 Drop in door or box at City Hall ZO /Z0 39dd 003W OIN081Q3W T8£TPTS£9L TG:9T £TOZ /ZT /Z0 MEMORANDUM Date: March 15, 2013 To: City of Mound Docks and Commons Commission From: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administration Subject: Villa Dock Fees for 2013 and beyond At the August 27`x' DCC meeting, staff was directed to work with Council Liaison David Osmek on alternatives to the Villa dock fee proposal. The following plan was approved by the Mound City Council and incorporated into the fee schedule approved at the December 11, 2012 regular City Council Meeting. Since the City had received concerns from potential developers about the marketability of the Villa townhomes if the dock fees were increased for Villa residents and because the City is committed to the remaining lots being developed in order for tax increment to be generated to help pay the debt service, slip fees for Villa residents were not increased. For the remaining dock sites that are not used by Villa residents, the following was proposed: One half of the remaining available slips will be offered to Mound residents for a total of $1,600 per year, including escrow and LMCD fees. The other half of the remaining slips will be offered to non -Mound residents for a total of $2,600 per year, including escrow and LMCD fees. If non -Mound residential demand does not require all of the slips, they can be offered to Mound residents for the $1,600. A portion of the total fee revenue collected for the Villa docks will remain in the Dock Fund to cover the expenses related to the Villa docks (insurance, water, electric, LMCD fees, and the three escrow accounts). The remaining fee revenue will be used for an interfund loan between the Dock Fund and the FIRA to help pay the debt service on the 2009 TIF bonds that financed the dredging of Lost Lake. Ordiance No. 09 -2012 was approved at the November 13, 2012 meeting and made effective on November 25, 2012 in attempt to implement the proposed fee structure outlined above. I am recommending changes to what was approved as it did not address the 50 %/50% allocation. In addition, the developer has requested the Villa residents be allowed to rent a second slip at the market rate. We will discuss these issues at the March 21, 2013 meeting to determine what the DCC would like to recommend to the Council. W CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -2013 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 78 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO WATERWAYS The City of Mound does ordain: That Chapter 78, Section 78 -122, Licenses, be amended to read as follows: See. 78 -122. Licenses. (e) License Priorities for Villas on Lost Lake Slips. The Dock Administration shall assign all locations to the applicants upon compliance with this ordinance and subject to reasonable conditions. The number of slip licenses available in each of these categories will be determined by the Dock Administration on an annual basis. Ever Residence, defined as a fully- constructed townhome located on Lost Lake Lane or Lost Lake Court in Mound, Minnesota, will be assigned one slip and the resident may choose whether or not they want to rent the slip on an annual basis. If they decline the slip, it will be included in the pool of slips rented to non -Villa residents. The following allocation and priorities govern the issuance of Villas on Lost Lake slip licenses available in the pool to be issued on a year to year basis: (1) . 50% of available slips in the pool will be offered to Mound residents at the rate established in the Fee Schedule for Lost Lake Villa Multiple Slip (to Mound /non -Villa Residents) using the following priority: (a). Mound residents on the current wait list who rented a Villa Slip the prior season. Note: If less slips exist in this category than the prior year, the position on the wait list will determine who gets right of first refusal (b). Mound residents on the current wait list (c.) Mound residents not on the current wait list. (2) Seeend Priority.- s3Flont8 en- ourrent 'A' of available slips in the pool will be offered at the rate established in the Fee Schedule for Lost Lake Villa Multiple (to non -Mound residents) using the following priority: (a). Villa Residents wanting a second slip who rented a second Villa Slip the prior season. (b). Villa Residents wanting a second slip who did not rent a second Villa Slip the prior season. (c). Mound residents on the current wait list who rented a Villa Slip the prior season and do not qualify for a slip in the pool above. Note: If less slips exist in this category than the prior year, the position on the wait list will determine who gets right of first refusal (d). Mound residents on the current wait list (e.) Mound residents not on the current wait list. (f). The eg neral public, including non -Mound residents, with priority given to those who held a Villa Slip in the prior season. (3) —ThW rlerit} . (4) FeurA Priority.- The geHefal publie, with pfiefily given to previous Villas on hest Lake slip holdeFs, based -en senierity. Passed by the City Council this _ day of 2013. Mayor Mark Harms Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Published in The Laker on xx/xx/13. Effective on xx/xx/13. �3