Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
1990-02-20 CC Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL PACKET - 2/20/90 ��1
•
•
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
A O 3 N D 11
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1990
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
2. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 13, 1990,
8. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT.
9. REQUEST TO USE MOUND BAY PARK ,'OR BASS FISHING
TOURNAMENT (WEIGH -IN ONLY, AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP
FOUNDATION - JUNE 10, 1990.
10. PAYMENT REQUEST - 1990 MAINTENANCE DREDGE -
$27,225.00.
11. LICENSE RENEWALS.
12. PAYMENT OF BILLS.
13. INFORMATION /MISCELLANEOUS
A. January Financial Report as prepared by
John Norman, Financ3 Director.
Pg. 591-592
Pg. 593 -594
Pg. 595
Pg. 595a -606
Pg. 607 -608
Page 491
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING.
Pg.
493 -497
3.
PUBLIC HEARING: DELINQUENT
UTILITY BILLS.
Pg.
498 -499
4.
1989 DEPARTMENT HEAD ANNUAL
REPORTS:
- JAN BERTRAND, BUILDING
OFFICIAL
Pg.
500 -516
- DON BRYCE, FIRE CHIEF
Pg.
517 -529
- FRAN CLARK, CITY CLERK
Pg.
530 -552
5.
CABE #90 -904: GENE & BRENDA PETERSON, 6017 RIDGEWOOD
ROAD, LOT 18,
BLOCK 6, THE HIGHLANDS,
FID #23- 117 -24
43 0031.
REQUEST: FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE.
Pg.
553 -566
6.
COMMENTS ON DNR APPLICATION
#90 -6173 TO DREDGE
AT SETON LAKE, ROGER BECKEL,
4961 BARTLETT BLVD.
Pg.
567 -581
7.
COMMENTS ON DNR APPLICATION
#90 -6192 TO INSTALL A
SAND BLANKET AT PHELPS BAY,
MARK GOLDBERG, 4853
ISLAND VIEW DRIVE.
Pg.
582 -590
8. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT.
9. REQUEST TO USE MOUND BAY PARK ,'OR BASS FISHING
TOURNAMENT (WEIGH -IN ONLY, AMERICAN SCHOLARSHIP
FOUNDATION - JUNE 10, 1990.
10. PAYMENT REQUEST - 1990 MAINTENANCE DREDGE -
$27,225.00.
11. LICENSE RENEWALS.
12. PAYMENT OF BILLS.
13. INFORMATION /MISCELLANEOUS
A. January Financial Report as prepared by
John Norman, Financ3 Director.
Pg. 591-592
Pg. 593 -594
Pg. 595
Pg. 595a -606
Pg. 607 -608
Page 491
B. Letter dated 2 -9 -90 from NSP on upcoming
scheduled public and evidentiary hearings
regarding NSPIs latest rate increase
proposal. Pg. 609 -610
C. Information memo on Lot 3, Block 2, Westwood.Pg. 611 -620
D. Planning Commission Minutes - February 12, 1990. Pg. 621 -626
E. REMINDER: No City Council meeting, Tuesday,
February 27, 1990, due to precinct caucuses.
Next regular meeting will be March 13, 1990.
F. League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) 1990 Legislative
Conference will be held Wednesday, March 14, 1990,
at the Radisson Hotel, St. Paul. Please let
Fran know by March 2, 1990, if you want to
attend.
G. Notice from Metro Council regarding the annual
State of the Region Meeting. It will be held
Wednesday, March 7, 1990, at the Hyatt Regency,
Minneapolis. Please let Fran know by
February 26, 1990, if you wish to attend. Pg. 627
.7
•
Page 492
18
February 13, 1990
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 13, 1990
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, February 13, 1990, in the Council
Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea
Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also
present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk
Fran Clark, Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engin: John Cameron,
City Architect Steve Jantzen, Park Director Jim Fackler, Street
Superintendent Geno Hoff, Water & Sewer Superintendent Greg
Skinner, City Insurance Agent Earl Bailey and the following
interested citizens: Curt & Marge Olson, Tom Casey, Robert
Tomalka, and Pat Meisel.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in
attendance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
1.0 MINUTES
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to approve the
minutes of the January 23, 1990, Regular Meeting as
submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
1.1 MOTION made by Johnson seconded by Smith to approve the
minutes of the February 10, 1990, Special Meeting as
submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
1989 DEPARTMENT HEAD ANNUAL REPORTS
The following Department Heads presented their 1989 annual
reports to the City Council: Jim Fackler, Park Director; Geno
Hoff, Street Superintendent; and Greg Skinner, water & Sewer
Superintendent.
1.2 CITY HALL ADDITION AND RENOVATION
The City Manager explained that the plans and specifications for
the City Hall addition and renovation have now been completed and
are ready for the Council to approve and set a bid opening date.
The Council thanked the Task Force for their two years of time
spent on this project.
•
413
ilpt
February 13, 1990 9
Jensen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -24 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING THE
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE ADDITION
TO AND RENOVATION OF CITY HALL - BID
OPENING MARCH 21, 1990, AT 2:00 P.M.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.3 SET PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to set March 13,
1990, at 7:30 P.M. for a public hearing to consider a
Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of an addition
to Mound City Hall lccated at 5341 Maywood Road, Lots 9 -13,
Block 3, Shirley Hills Unit D, in the R -1 Single Family
Zoning District, PID #24- 117 -24 21 0034. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
COMME & STI GGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
There were no comments or suggestions from citizens present.
1.4 R ENEWAL OF MUNICIPAL INSURANCE PROGRAM i
Mr. Earl Bailey, R. L. Youngdahl & Associates, presented the ne '
insurance premiums which are as follows:
1990 1990
1989 PROJECTED AC TUAL
Property
8,642
14,000
8,859
(1)
Crime
293
INCL.
INCL.
(1)
Equipment
4,401
INCL.
3,296
(1)
General Liability
42,847
45,000
46,740
(1)
Auto
23,278
24,500
23,038
(1)
Liquor Liability
4,622
4,900
4,504
(2)
Emer. Med. Techs.
INCL.
INCL.
INCL.
(1)
Public Officials E & 0
5,464
5,700
5,556
(1)
Police Professional
INCL.
INCL.
INCL.
(1)
Worker's Compensation
48
55,000
59,924
(3)
Bonds
1,236
1,236
1,238
(4)
Fireman's A & H
250
250
250
(5)
TOTAL
139,420
150,586
153,405
•
414
20
February 13, 1990
Specialty Lines:
(1) League of MN. Cities Insurance Trust thru N.S.R.S.
(2) Transcontinental Insurance Co. (CNA) thru John
Crowther
(3) League of MN. Cities Insurance Trust thru E.B.A.
(4) Capitol Indemnity
(5) Health Special Risk
Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -25 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE POLICIES,
PREMIUMS AND COMPANIES AS SUBMITTED BY
MR. EARL BAILEY, R. L. YOUNGDAHL i
ASSOCIATES FOR THE 1990 INSURANCE
PROGRAM
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.5 APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -26 RESOLUTION APPOINTING THE ASSISTANT WEED
0 INSPECTOR, JIM FACKLER
The vote was unanimously in favor. Moticn carried.
1.6 PROCLAMATION - VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK
Ahrens moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -27 RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MARCH 4-11, 1990,
AS VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK IN THE
CITY OF MOUND
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.7 CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF RESIDE - SALE OF CEMETERY
-- — ------- - - - - -- - ------- - - - - --
LOTS
The City Clerk explained that there is confusion over the current
definition of a "resident" for the purpose of purchasing a grave
site at the Mound Union Cemetery. The Park Commission has
recommended changing the definition as follows:
FROM: Individual is a current resident of Mound at the ti:-0
of purchasing the cemetery lot(s).
U
41s,
21
February 13, 1990 •
TO: Individual to be interred is a current resident of the
City of Mound at the time of his /her death, or at the
time of purchasing his /her grave site.
Smith moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -28 RESOLUTION CONCURRING WITH THE
RECOMMENDATION FROM PARR AND OPEN SPACE
COMMISSION CLARIFYING DEFINITION OF
1 FRESIDENT 1 ' FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURCHASING
CEMETERY LOTS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.8 PAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to authorize the
payment of bills as presented on the pre -list in the amount
Of $231,984.62 when funds are available. A roll call vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
ADD -ON ITEM
Councilmember Johnson stated he would like to discuss the City's
position on opening County wells to raise the lake level of Lake 49
Minnetonka. Councilmember Jessen stated the Park Commission
discussed this issue and recommended that the City oppose the
opening of these wells if it comes before the County Board. The
Council stated they would wait to see if the issue comes before
the County Board for approval.
INF /MISCELLANEOUS
A. January 1990, Department Head Monthly Reports.
B. L.M.C.D. Representative's Monthly Report for January 1990.
C. Preliminary Budget Report for 1989 as prepared by John
Norman, Finance Director.
D. LMCD mailings.
E. Notice from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC)
regz.rding their search for applicants to serve on the
General Adviscry Committee to the MWCC.
F. Economic Development Commission Minutes cf January ?,
i s
m
22
• February 13, 1990
G. REMINDER: Special City Council Meeting on the Comprehensive
Plan Update, Saturday, February 10, 1990, beginning at 8:00
A.M. at City Hall.
H. REMINDER: February 27, 1990, regular Council meeting has
been rescheduled to February 20, 1990 and therefore, no
Committee of the Whole meeting in February. Next C.O.W.
meeting is March 20, 1990.
I. League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) 1990 Legislative Conference
will be held Wednesday, March 14, 1990, at the Radisson
Hotel, St. Paul. Please let FLan know by March 2, 1990, if
you want to attend.
J. Bulletin from the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
(A-MM) regarding the Legislature and Tax Increment Financing.
K. LMC 1990 City Policies and Priorities.
L. Information. submitted by Councilmember Jessen on "Toxic Air
Pollution ".
M. Letter from Mir
Damon Hardina,
"SB" Wastewater
MOTION made by
9:15 M.
carried.
mesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) that
Sewer Department employee, has passed his
Treatment License.
Jensen, seconded Jessen by to adjourn at
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk
`I17
Delinquent Water and Sewer
11
010
151
$172.17
11
0130
241
159.52
11
0190
421
132.71
11
0190
511
100.00
11
0190
664
94.52
11
0280
332
88.47
11
0280
453
114.54
11
0280
541
175.01
11
0310
661
125.73
11
0340
092
183.18
11
0640
243
117.50
11
0670
062
139.69
11
0672
262
100.37
11
0672
361
175.20
11
0672
541
127.72
11
0730
061
163.34
11
0850
421
242.37
11
0850
601
117.91
11
0852
542
93.97
11
1030
422
190.27
11
1030
752
108.23
11
1090
661
126.28
?1
1120
035
127.01
11
1150
062
102.47
11
1550
124
209.95
:1
1570
151
15IJ.14
2/14/90
•
•
`Iq
1
1690
515
$105.35
1690
544
131.60
11
1690
571
157.08
11
1690
751
100.56
11
1692
061
160.40
11
1694
631
128.29
11
1750
062
131.03
11
1900
601
109.78
11
1900
662
;45.70
11
1930
034
154.84
11
1930
181
122.48
11
1990
302
90.66
11
2110
091
118.18
0
2260
033
90.66
$5385.18
•
III
2/14/90
Delinquent Water and Sewer
11
010
151
Rodney Pitsch
Pd.
$172.17
1768
Lafayette Ln.
11
0130
241
Steve Hinchclif
County
159.52
1689
Avocet Ln.
11
0190
421
Robert Shanlev
Pd.
132.71
1676
Canary Ln.
11
0190
511
Charles Carlson
Pd.
100.00
1700
Canary Ln.
11
0190
664
James Brand
Pd.
94.52
1724
Canary Ln.
11
0280
332
Wm. Bull
88.47
1616
Finch Ln.
11
0280
453
Dave Zilka
".,
44
1643
Finch Ln.
11
0280
541
Ron Nelson
175.01
1656
Finch Ln.
11
0310
661
Craig Hillerns
Pd.
125.73
1721
Gull Ln.
11
0340
092
Darryl Dillion
183.18
1643
Heron Ln.
11
0640
243
Brian Johnson
117.50
4945
Glen Elyn Rd.
11
0670
062
Lori Kinsey
County
139.69
1701
Shorewood Ln.
11
0672
262
James Kurilia
100.37
1901
Shorewood Ln.
11
0672
361
Jack Breazile
175.20
1:20
Shorewood Ln.
11
061?
541
S.Mierzejewski
127.72
1.942
Shorewood Ln.
11
0730
061
Norman Hemerick
163.34
4716
Beachside Rd.
11
0850
421
Terrance Hawley
Pd.
242.37
4948
Three Pts. Blvd.
11
0850601
Mark Allen
117.91
4970
Three Pts. Blvd.
11
0852
542
Bob Lund
93.97
5525
Three Pts. Blvd.
11
1030
422
Tim Herzog Contract
Pd.$60.00
190.27
5804
Sunset Rd.
11
1030
752
T.01son
Pd.
108.23
5921
Sunset Rd.
11
1090
661
Lawrence Beer
Pd. $70.00
126.28
6030
Hillcrest Rd.
11
1120
035
James Lassek
Pd.
127.01
5912
Gumwood Rd.
11
1150
062
Greg Ward
Pd,
102.47
2143
Diorond Ln.
11
1550
124
J. Eccl
209.95
2214
' l lord Ln.
11
1570
151
Steve Sobieniak
15;.44
6.21
';he taut Pd.
11 1690 515
11 i590 544
11 169U 571
11 1690 751
11 1692 061.
11 1694 631.
1.1 1750 062
11 1900 601.
11 1900 662
11 1930 034•
11 1930 181
11 1990 302
.l. 2110 091
11 2260 03:3
MiJiael Fox
Lynn Dustin
John Larson
Francis Enc,le
Bruce Jones
Sha ^ry Johnson
>ohns & Sabin
Lauren Hofteig
Scott Lasterday
Gary Patos
Joa ina Lvenson
Lance Gyllenblad
Glenn Reger
Richard Peterson
Pd.
$135.35
5700
Lynwood Blvd.
Pd.
$50.00 131.60
5909
Lynwood Blvd.
Pd.
157.08
5713
Lynwood Blvd.
Pd.$50.00 100.56
5745
Lynwood Blvd.
Pd.
$80.00 160.40
582C
Lynwood Blvd.
128.29
6256
Lynwood Blvd.
131.03
5444
Spruce Rd.
Pd.
109.78
: -216
Noble Ln.
145.70
?_22:3
Noble Ln.
154.84
2123
Cedar Ln.
Pd.
122.43
, 146
Cedar Ln.
93.66
2212
Belmont Ln.
118.18
2135
Overland Ln.
90.66
2151
Apple Ln.
$5385.18
$3375.28
January. 1990
Honoraole Mayor, City Council Members, and City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Dear Mayor, Council Members, and City Manager:
The Inspection /Planning Department once again is concluding the fiscal year, and
enclosed is our Annual Report to you. We nave made some major strides pertaining to
the future development and redevelopment in the city this year. This report will
give the citizens of Mound an ovarview of the ongoing operations of the Inspection 6
Planning Oepartm._
The Mound Planning Commission advisory board submitted a report to the City Council
on the topic of Housing Maintenance. They nave also completed a Comprehensive Plan
draft which will be forwarded to the City Council for review in January. The City •
Council adopted a new policy for the reappointments and new appointments to the city
advisory boards. Two new Planning Commissioners were placed on the Board in Decem-
ber to complete tte terms of Brad Sohns and Vern Andersen. The commission is also
attempting to help the City Council address the issue of public materials storage
locations and improvements.
Construction in 1989 continued to emphasize residential projects with over 200 per-
mits issued to remodel residential properties and 31 new residential housing unitz.
Five of the 31 homes constructed were rebuilt after demolition of old structures;
two demolitions were prompted from fire damage. The Masonic lodge was destroyed by
a fire and is now in the process of being rebuilt. In addition, the Indian Knoll
Manor seniors building is being extensively remodeled with 19 units expanded In
size.
New opportunities will be presented in 1990 with the addition and remodeling of City
Hall being designed, the review of, and /or the future needs of the Mound Bay Depot
and Island Park hall /garage facilities, zoning approval cf a Conditional Use Permit
for a wood working shop on Shoreline Drive, the purchase of Rite -Away Oil by Rapid
Oil Change, and discussions to convert an existing home on Ccvnerce Blvd. to a com-
mercial use. All of these may result in project construction in 1990.
The Inspection /Planning staff will continue a cooperative atmosphere for citizens,
developers, and government agencies to keep Mound progressive in their development
and redevelopment of their existing and new structures.
Yours truly,
)Jan Bertrand
So. Building Official
1989 ANNUAL REPO
0
Personnel
Figure 1., sho - :4s the organization of the Inspection/ Planning Depart-
ment personnel.
In the 1989 fiscal year, we saw no changes in the staffing nor the
personnel for the department. Jan Bertrand completed eight years of
service on December 1, Peggy James completed her first year of service
August 8, and John Breitner completed his first year with Mound on
July 1. AI ToIIakson, State Electrical Inspector also completed his
first year in Mound in September. The other support staff for the
department including the City Planner, Mark Koegler, from VanDoren,
Hazard 8 Stallings, City Engineer, John Cameron, from McCombs Frank
Roos, and state and county agencies such as the Hennepin County Health
Inspector and Housing & Urban Development grant and loan inspectors
also remained the same in 1989.
The duties of our personnel have been the same as previous years with
a few exceptions. Peggy James and mysel were the c i t y coordinator
for the United Way campaign fund drive. Letters were sent to all
employeeG, a presentation was made available to all employees and
pledge cards and monies were co!lected, recorded and sent to the
United Way offices. I attended six meetings of the Task Force to
study the poss expansion of City Hall.
Contracted services from our City Engineer, Joh;i Cameron, nave in-
volved grading permits, at Anthony's Floral and varie >us construction
sites such as: residential development_, city facilities, some zoning
requests for a street vacation, sjhdivisions, conditional use permit,
and for the Alexander Park plat to construct a thre- unit condominium
40 as w e l l as other rp'.jljp� s a5 ass i gned.
So
1 Annual Report
Inspection /Planning Dept.
Page Two
The contracted services from our City Planner, Mark Koegler, have in-
volved several zoning amendments to the sign, zoning and fence or-
dinances, revisions to our comprehensive plan, and meetings with the
LMCD area -wide committee to develop a Shoreland Management Plan. Mr.
Koegler has also reviewed various zoning requests during the year.
As Building Official for the City of Mound, I am responsible to com-
plete 1989 construction projects, do plan reviews for new construc-
tion, additions and remodeling, approve the issuance of permits for
building, signs, fences and demolition, and keep records of all in-
spections made during construction including code gompliance for 510
permits in 1989. 1 also report to the Planning Commission on various
requests, respond to complaints ranging from soil erosion to sanita-
tion, to multiple dwelling complaints.
0
1 was appointed 10th District Legislative Chairman for the American
Legion Auxiliary in July. I was elected 11th Regional Director for
Allied Charities of Minnesota on December 2, 1989.
Depar tment Inter faces
The interfacing with other state and county agencies is an important
aspect of an effective Inspection /Planning Department including the
various City of Mound departments. Figures 2., 2.a., 2.b., and 2.c.
show to what extent we draw on the expertise of these other depart-
ments and agencies of government.
Ir i n i nq__and 1 m2l ementat i ons
Zoning regulations, fire codes, and building standards are established
by ordinance as a consumer protection to assure property owners of the
maintenance of property value, safety, health and general welfare for
building occupants.
So
1989 Annual Report Pace Three
Inspection /Planning Dept.
Minnesota has adopted national code standards from the International
Conference of Building Officials (I.C.B.O.), American National Stand-
ards Institute, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Fire Protection
Association and others to regulate the building industry.
I attended two seminars in November, one conducted by the Minnesota
Building Codes and Standards Division and one conducted by I.C.B.O.
sponsored by local chapters o^ I.C.B.O. Training is provided and time
allotted for studying technical research reports on methods and
materials which are supplied from I.C.B.O., State Building Codes and
Standards G: vision, Energy Division of Minnesota, etc. during the
year. Continuing education is required to maintain the Building Offi-
cial certification from the State of Minnesota. A building p ?rmit
surcharge is collected and submitted to the Minnesota Department of
Administration to be allocated for Building Inspection Department
training.
In 1989, Peggy James implemented two new programs on her computer,
they are Rapidfile and Clerks Index System. She uses Rapidfile for
documenting the plumbing and mechanical registrations, it will also
print labels for mailings to designated groups. The Clerks Index Sys-
tem will be used to document all planning and zoning cases. pertinent
discussion items, and pertinent park commission items. This program
will prove to be an asset when searching for specific related informa-
tion, especially in years to come. She has also developed a working
knowledge of the city ordinances to help with many inquiries made to
our department.
Ord inance Enforcement
During 1989, the Inspection /Planning Department issued approximately
200 compliance and correspondence letters, plus warning tags, and
Inspection notices to correct and /or complete items listed. These
503
1989 Annual Report
Inspection /Planning Dept.
Page Four
0
notices, tags and correspondence involved zoning, sign, fence, soil
erosion, expired building permits which require renewal. final Inspec-
tions or compliance reinspection, and other items.
Of the notices sent to property owners and contractors, 58 resulted in
either formal complaints, issuance of a citation, or a warning letter
from the city prosecutor's office. One of the cases was initiated by
City Council action to remove a structure which was under construction
with no building permit. There were 48 citations issued for exterior
storage and improper waste containment on public and private property.
Dtpartmen Activ
The construction activities are summarized on Figure 3.a. and 3.b.
The comparison shown gives the number of new dwelling units and valua-
tion of new construction from 1973 through 1989. 0
The valuation of construction saw a decline from the 1988 value of
$6,567,110 to $4,514,593 in 1989. The number of permits issued were
636 in 1989, a decline of 42 from 1988. The number of single dwelling
units were 32 in 1989 and 38 units in 1988. The 1989 construction
year revolved around the residential segment of Mound.
Commi ss_i on_Act i v_i ty_
The Planning Commission a -its as an advisory board to the city council
as a Board of Appeals for zoning requests ranging from interpretation
of the ordinance to Subdivision of lands. They have been assigned the
task to review the Comprehensive Plan update for the next decade,
review of the Shoreland Management Plan; they have given the city
council a summary of the housing maintenance issues they feel should
be implemented into an ordinance torm, and given their input into the
public works material storlirle issue. Bill Thal was the planninf&
commission's representative t(_) the city hall facilities improvemen
Task Force during 1989.
goy
1989 Annual Report Page Five
Inspection /Planning Dept.
The nur)ber of Board of Appeals cases increased f rom 40 in 1988 to 49
in 1989. A summary of their activity is shown in Fiaure 4.a. and 4.b.
The fourth annual Recognition Dinner was held at the Lafayette Club on
October 21, 1989 for the Planning Commission. The city had the oppor-
tunity to show their appreciation to the members for the many volun-
teer hours of service to the community.
The city council findings were in agreement with the commission in 92
percent of the requests with some amendments at the council level.
Opera ting _Rev and Expend i tu
The budget appropriation for the Inspection /Planning Department in
1989 was $128,400. At year -end, the unaudited expenses for the
department was $117,160. The Inspection /Planning Department estab-
lishes zoning, escrow and permit fees with the expectation the ex-
penses will be matched by the services to the users.
In absences during training conferences, illness, or vacation days.
Metro West Inspection :services have filled in for us. (hose expenses
as well as contracted services for the city planner, city engineer,
and plumbing inspector are expended from the professional services ac-
count. This year the expenses for professional services is ap-
proximately 80 percent of the budgeted $39,000. We had establi
escrow accounts to defray city costs on several developments during
the year, such as the utility improvements for Minnetrista residents,
Alexander Park P l a t , an.1 Lann( V i e w P l a t .
We ri�ive zoning enforcement for I i ght i nq g 1 are , exterior storage, ero-
sion problems. fencing, etc. and firE. maintenance cone enforcement on
multiple dwellings, as well as similar activities which do not have
revenues to h(-' def rav the enfc,r cemewnt co ,t s .
SOS
1989 Annual Report
Inspections /Planning
Page Six
QD
A comparison of the revenues generated by the Inspection Department
activities during 1988 and 1989 is as follows:
Account
Codes 1988 1989
3251
Building Permits
$ 72,885
$ 55,553
3252
Fire Permits
-0-
138
3254
Plumbing Permits
9,665
8,973
3256
Excavation /Grading Permits
6,870
4.803
3257
Heating Permits
2.390
2,100
3258/59
Plumbing 8 Mech. Registration
n/a
1,620
3262
Moving Permits
-0-
_ 1 00
TOTAL
$ 91.810
$ 73,287
The revenues collected for the Planning Commission Board of Ap
peals were:
m
3510
$ 3.100
1989
$ 4.950
Total revenues generated uy the Inspection /Planning Department
were:
1988 1989
$ 91,810 $ 73,287
The revenue generated amount to 627. of the 1989 Denartment ex-
penses.
50�
1989 Annual Report Page Seven
Inspection/Planning dept.
Sumrr.:jry
The 1989 construction and development year saw a decline in ac-
tivity from the three previous years. Hopefully, the economic
climate effecting a nation -wide decline will improve approaching
the new decade of the 90's.
our staff will continue to service and cooperate with the
citizens, contractors, architects and developers in a courteous
and efficient manner. We welcome the challenges of the future
and new innovations which will affect how we live and work in the
90's.
We want to thank the elected officials and the city staff for
their continued support and interest in our endeavors.
•
0
Sod
INSPECTION DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION
Mou City Counci
Mayor: Steve Smith
Council Members: Elizabeth Jensen
Skip Johnson
Phyllis Jensen
I
Andrea Ahrens
j
City Manager
Ed Shukle
Buildinq Official
Jan Bertrand
City__Planner State - and County_Agencies
Mark Koegler State Electrical Inspector
VanDoren, Hazard, County Health Inspector
6 Stalling5, Inc. County Planninq S Development
F i oure I .
Support Staff
Peggy James
John Breitner
City_En_qineer
John Cameron
McCombs frank Roos
Associates, Inc.
•
C]
•
08
0
Interface with other Agencies and Departments
INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
City - of Mound
Inspection
Department
• State 1--ounty
Agencies Agencies
0 F iaUrP i'.
City of Mound
i
( Other Departments
So 1
INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
Interface with State Agencies
I
City of Mound
Inspection i
L Oeoartment
MN State Buildinq
Code Division
o Uniform Building Code
o National Electric Code
o ANSI Elevator Code
o MN Plumbing Code
o MN Heating,
Ventilation, Air Condi-
tioning & Refrigeration
Code
o MN Manufacturer3 Home
Rules
o Model Energy Code
o Solar Energy Sys *.ems
Standards
Figure ?.a.
MN Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA)
o Environmental Quality
in Structures
o Air Quality Regs.
o Water Quality Regs
o Soil Quality Regs
State Fire Marshal
• Uniform Fire Cooe
• Child Day Car? Centers
o Underground Tank Installa-
tion
Environmental
Quality
Protection Board
o Land Development
• Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS)
• Environmental Assess-
ment worksheet (EAW)
-- Dept. of Natural
Resources
o Shoreline Manaqement
o flood Plain Regs.
is
•
•
Slo
0
L
0
INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
Interface with County Agencies
--
city of mound
inspection
Department
Dept. of Dent. of
Transportation Human Se rvic es
n Utility Permits o Family Day
o Driveway Access care
o Parking u Group mnmes
o Foster
Parents
Fiqore Z.b.
|
Ervironmental
Health
Environment &
Eneray
n License &
Inspection of
nuo|s, ire
arenas.
restaurants
o Hazardous
waste recy-
cling
Lake Minnetonka
Conservation Dist.
Minnehaha Creek
Watershed Dist.
o
ecv-
o On-Lake Activities
• Land Filling
• Soil Excavation
• Erosion Control
o Storm Water Mgmt.
����
INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
Interface with other Citv Departments
Fiqure 7.c.
5 2.
- -- -
r
Finance Parks
I
• Escrow o Project
Accounts Review
• Billing o Tree
• BuOaet Inspection
Charges o Dock 6
o SunpIIes Commons
o Frrms Use/Con-
struction
o City Mall
Improvements
•
City of Mound
Inspection
Department
City
Police
Public
Fire
Manager
Works
- - -_
- -- —
- --
i
- - J
• Budgets o
Enforcement
o Abandoned o
Underground
• Policies o
Vandalism
Wells/
Tanks
• Organization
of Bldgs.
Septic o
Fire
• Training
6 Construe-
Tanks
Suppression
• Staff
tion
o Driveway
Systems
o
Citation
Access o
Access to
Due Process
o Street
Bldgs. A
Excavation
Equipment
o water/ o
Building
Sewer Mein
Maintenance
beat icn &
Connection
o 0ty
Easement
Locations
o Hydrant Tests
o Street Ba - r ica� l es
Fiqure 7.c.
5 2.
- -- -
r
Finance Parks
I
• Escrow o Project
Accounts Review
• Billing o Tree
• BuOaet Inspection
Charges o Dock 6
o SunpIIes Commons
o Frrms Use/Con-
struction
o City Mall
Improvements
•
0 Total Yearly Values of New Construction
73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
Year and Yearly Value in Thousands ($)
e
513
New Housing Units (1978 - 1989)
120
100
c 80
CD
C
0
= 60
3
m
Z
40
20
Figure i.h.
,e
•
U
514
73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
Year
•
1989 SUMMARY REPORT
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION BOARD Of APPEALS
A total of 49 cases were heard in 1989
0
1]
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Conditional Use Permit
Subdivision: Plat
Minor
Vacation
Variance*
Wetland
Zoning Amendment
House Moving
TOTAL
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Conditional Use Permit
Subdivision: Plat
Minor
Vacation
Variance'
Wetland
Zoning Amendment
House Moving
TOTAL
*One variance was split into two motions: I approved, and one fence height denied.
Figure 4.1.
AEpr Denied W drawn Tabled No Ac tion Total
6
1
2
7
3
3
3
6
I I
3
1
8
1
19
6
1
1
16
I
26
1
2
1
1
26
u
1
I
1
2
2
1
2
38
7
1 3
0
49
Approved Denied W drawn Tabled No Action Total
4
2
1
7
3
3
3
1
2
1
1
8
1
16
6
1
2
1
1
26
1
1
2
1
1
2
29
8
3
5
4
49
S).50
1988 SUMMARY REPORT
PLANNING a ZONING COMMISSION BOARD OF APPEALS
A total of 40 cases were heard In 1968
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Conditional Use Permit
Sign
Subdivision: Plat
Minor
Vacation
Variance*
Wetland
Zoning Amendment"
Gradina
TOTAL
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Conditional Use Permit
Sign
Subdivision: Plat
Minor
Vacation
Variance*
Wetland
Zoning Amendment'"
Grading
TOTAL
Approved Denied W drawn T abled No Action Total
5
1
5
2
I
3
0
_ 7
1
7
5
1
5
12
2
1
1
1
1 -5
3
1
1
1
3
1
35
4
0
1
0
40
Approved Denied W drawn Ta bled No Acti Tota
4
1
5
3
3
0
6
1
7
4
1
5
12
1
1
1
15
1
1
3
3
1
1
33
2
1
2
2
40
: One variance was converted to a subdivision, and one variance was converted to
a vacation.
**Two zoning amendments were initiated by the staff: clarification of sign and
fence provisions.
•
Figure 4.b
SI4
/`loved ?/ol�� 01 $ , IN&
Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364
•
February 12, 1990
TO: Mayor Steve Smith
Mound City Council
City Manager, Ed Shukle
FROM: Don Bryce, Fire Chief
HM FIRE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT
Fire and rescues calls were down 8% from last year. And last year was down
7% from the previous year. We had 185 fire calls and 195 rescues calls, total
of 380 calls. Over all down 36% for fires and up 21% on rescues. I would
say our fire prevention must be working.
In Pound we were down 33% on fire calls and up 31% on rescues. Mound had
a total of 225 calls, 3% less than last year. Thats 66% of our calls.
The breakdown for the contract cities is: Minnetonka Beach, down 28% on
fire and down 50% on rescues, (14 fires and 1 rescue). Minnetrista, down
27% on fires and down 5% on rescues, (18 fires and 18 rescues). Orono up
13% on fires and down 22% on rescues, (14 fires and 9 rescues). Shorewood,
up 50% on rescues, same on fires, (1 fire and 2 rescues). Spring Park down
41% on fires and up 14% on rescues, (27 fires and 21 rescues). The total
for the contract cities ,is 101 fires and 51 rescues, down 15% from 1988.
Mutual Aid we were down 2 calls that we went on. We gave to St. Boni and
Maple Plain. We received from St. Boni, Long Lake each 1 time and 4 times
from Maple Plain. On one house fire in Minnetrista we had Long Lake and
Maple Plain at the fire, and St. Boni stood by at our station. That "one"
lonely Friday in March and our only snow storm!!! I can't stress enough
on how important it is to have Mutual Aid, for tankers to supply water, to
the cities that don't have hydrants, plus man power, especially during
the day time calls.
Training for the year consist of our drills, twice a month, WAFTA - through
their smoke house, gas evolutions and burning of houses, for excellent training.
We had 5 go to State Fire School, 2 to Fire Instructors School in Cincinnati,
Fire Training School in Mankato, Fire Fighter I, 7 to State Fire Conference
in Alexandria, 2 to State Fire Chiefs Conference in Rochester, and I went
to International Fire Chiefs Confe - ence at Indianapolis. Went through
2 cars for extrication, MCI - had smke machine and liquid smoke; fantastic
drill, we had with police and Waconia Paramedics; fire code class and
American Heat Videos.
Maintenance to our equipment is done by our own men, at the fire station,
except for a few major repairs. lie have three men that we call heavy
maintenance and we have four groups of 7 -8 men in a group, that clean the
station and do minor repairs and check everything on the trucks, like tires,
pimps, oil, gas /diesel, check hoses etc.
512
P ige 2 cont.
Half of the department has flashers, that they put on their dash board, when
we have calls. They seem to help, especially at night. These were bought by
our V.F.W. from `found. We still stress they have to obey the laws when answering
a call, on given circumstances we do exceed the speed limit, :,pending on the call.
We don't just go on calls and (-ills. We do have other meetings we have to
attend - WAFTA, Lake Mtitual Aiti, United Fire Fighters, Relief, 1989 I was
President of Hennepin County Fire Chiefs Asso. We do have additional training
on house burnings too. I am also on the Hennepin County Advisory Board, I also
attend other contract cities Cotuicil. `k plus I'Ne attended neighborhood
meetings in Fnchanted Island, for dry hydrants information.
We have monthly reports to the City and State. The city report consist of
the total number of calls, the breakdown for each city, fire & rescues, the
total hours for each man, plus total charges that the department receives
monthly for each man, plus total charges that the department receives monthly
for the payroll. The State report gees to the Fire Marshal office, r-'IRS
to keep a record on all calls that occur in the State of Minnesota.
Our computer is really getting a work our!! From 1 ly reports on the men,
maintenance records, hose records haz mats, hydrant markers, street etc. Slowly
but surely individuals are learning it.
The Relief Association is an organization mandated by State Law to manage the
receipts from the 2% State Aid and City Contribution and administer the Fire
Department disability and retirement benefits. To retire a fire fighter has
to have 20 years of service to collect the pension, they have to be 50 years
of age.
The future of the Department - we are waiting on bids for our new heavy rescue
truck, addition on the fire station. We must maintain a high level protection
for our fire fighters regarding gear, jackets, pants, gloves etc. Communications
is an essential link to a well command department. Hennepin County is putting
into use the CAD (Computer Aid Dispatch) and MDT (Mobil Digital Terminals)
systems. Both systems aid to dispatching and responding to all types of calls.
The commitment for being a fire fighter is a demanding commitment now a days.
We have more fire & rescue calls aver, )iir training has to be (and IS) the
best, alot more meetings and PR work!! To work a regular 40 hour job plus
another 20 -40 hours for the fire department, there really isn't much left
for fanilies. And your family has to he behind a fire fighter 100% or
it just won't work.
r�
�J
S18
j;j N0,44d V014� & 7i" . I I
Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364
•
FIREFIGHTER
A D D
R E S S
CITY
PHONE
DOB
ENTP.Y
ANDERSEN
JEFF
2221
SOUTHVIEW LN
MOUND
55364
47 2 -7 56 4
07/10/57
09
22
8'
ANDERSON
GREG
4924
PLYMOUTH RD
MOUND
55364
472 -7225
1118/60
12
03.7
BABB
GERALD
2169
BIRCH LN
MOUND
55364
472 -2858
08!27.'40
09
09;7
-
BEAUCHAMP
JOHN
6029
ASPEN RD
MOUND
55364
472 - 3070
08 29.36
04
06
7
BOYD
DAVID
5936
GUMWOOD RD
MOUND
55364
472 -4515
0130'52
02
03'7
BRYCE
DON
4820
CANTEBURY RD
MOUND
55364
472 -4085
12 04-42
05
03
6
BRYCE
SCOTT
5955
IDLFWOOD RD
MOUND
55364
472 -3622
01'09 57
01
09
7
CARLSON
DAVID
5485
ACORN RD
MOUND
55364
472 - 5485
10 17 51
04
05
7
CASEY
JTM
4968
AFTON RD
MOUND
55364
472 -1750
09,25 -55
09
12.8
COLLINS
STEVE
2121
GRANDVIE BLVD
MOUND
55364
472 -5267
09 08 50
02
06
7
DAVID
MIKE
2163
DIAMOND LN
MOUND
55364
472 - 4320
02 04'41
08
02
6
ERICKSON
BRIAN
6013
HAWTHORNE RD
MOUND
55364
472 -8069
06 10`60
06
C2
8
ERICKSON
STEVE
4367
SHORELINE DR
SP.PF
55384
471 - 7129
1 '28'49
11
03
7
FISK
PHILIP
4790
CAPRICE RD
Mo�I'ND
55364
472 -5173
03 09 67
05
01
8
GARVAIS
GERALD
2180
CARDINAL LN
MOUND
55364
472 - 2374
11.27x51
07
02
7
GRADY
KEVIN
760
APPLEGARDEN FD
MOUND
55364
472 -4058
07 30'61
06
06
8
ENDERS)N CRAIG
4435
DORCHESTER RD
MOUND
55364
472 -3361
09 18
11
01
7
NRY
PAUL
5056
SULGROVE RD
MOUND
55364
472 -5306
11'24 53
05
01
8
HNSON
GREG
6056
CHERRYWOOD RD
MOUND
55364
472 -1852
11'26 47
12
06
7
LANDSMAN
BRAD
2212
FAIRVIFW LN
MOUND
55364
472- 1817
02 15'52
03
04
7
MARSCHKE
RON
2207
NOBLE LN
MOUND
5c.364
4'2 - 3815
07 18'41
03
04
7
NAFUS
JOHN
2580
DUNWOODY LN
WAY
55391
471 - 7432
05%10 54
06
02
P
NELSON
MARV
2025
SHOREWOOD LN
MOUND
55364
472 -3500
08'19 50
11
03
7
NICCUM
BRET
2449
OAKLAWN RD
MOUND
55364
472 - 1983
12 09 65
07
10
F
OPITZ
BUD
2041
BELAIRE LN
MOUND
55364
472 - 2736
0702 42
06
01
-
PALM
GREG
2153
LANGDON LN
MOUND
55364
472 -1236
04'17 61
02
06
PALM
MIKE
2695
WESTEDGE BLVD
MOUND
55364
472 -1972
07 %14 59
06
04
PALM
TIM
4879
WILSHIRE PLVD
MOUND
55364
472 - 2398
07'16 65
05
01
F
PEDERSON
GREG
5087
ASPEN RD
MOUND
55364
472 -5785
02.22'
02
03
R.ASMUSSEN TONY
5951
LYNWOOD BLVD
MOUND
55364
472 -2912
05 02 59
03
04
f
SAVAGE
MIKE
3125
HIGHLAND BLVD
MOUND
55364
472 -3591
03 %08-50
09
15
f
STALLMAN
RON
2201.
CENTERVIE;s LN
MOUND
55364
472 -7904
03,'18;64
01
05
SWENSON
BILL
4387
WILSHIRE BLVD
MOUND
55364
472 -7061
06,'26!49
07
02
SWENSON
TOM
4387
WILSHIRE BLVD
MOUND
55364
472 -7061
06'26 49
09
08
WILLIAMS
RICK
5940
HILLCREST LN
MOUND
55364
472 -7170
07 08 60
11
07
WILLIAMS
TIM
3135
AYR LN
MOl'ND
553F
472 -6716
02 03 62
11
j7
'
/ J
41 %4� 4iu I "4~4df .11%&
Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364 11
a I , T 1 , V I S I ", I' P I T S p () C, T F p
E IR[ IJ P
F) N\ p p
0
HN P F H V P q n
J 0! 0
G F P G
7 Q 7
n 2
04
R OB, %I � P 4 'H r) 04
F p � I F) 1 p n
iI 5 AV I P
02
1 2 p F C, F F [) F P
1 4 S T E % F F P T t l c, V
lh 1 .1 A p V F i's 0
1) AVI a p
I H F
S C)TT F{ P'l F 0 n9
I r C I T c,
4
J( �fil
%I T c) I
24
7 ) - 7
%I
P F 04
J I % 1A
(J"
DAT F
6 4
70
7n
71
7
71, 4 0�
74
74
7
7 7 :
7
7
7T
7(,
78
7q
7 () ���
80
7
•
5 91.0
0 1989 REPORT
MOUND DEPARTMENT
BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
DIVISION 11
DUTIES AND PROCEDURES
INSPECTIONS AND UNSAFE BUILDINGS:
Section 2.201(a) Inspection. The Fire Prevention Bureau
shall inspect, as often as may be necessary. all buildings and
premises, including such other hazards or appliances as the chief
may designate for the purpose of ascertaining and causing to be
corrected any conditions which would reasonably tend to cause
fire or contribute to its spread. or any violation of the purpose
or provisions of this code and any other law or standard affect-
ing fire safety.
Section 2.201(b) Unsafe Buildings. All buildings or struc-
tures which are structurally unsafe or not provided with adequate
egress, or which constitutes a f i r e hazard or are otherwise dan-
gerous to human 1 i fe, or which in r e l a t i o n to existing use con-
stitutes a fire hazard or health or public welfare, by reasr of
inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, obsolescence, fire hazard,
disaster damage or abandonment as specified in this code or any
other effective ordinance, are, for the purpose of this section.
unsafe buildings. All such unsafe buildings are hereby declared
to be public nuisances and shall be abated by repair, rehabilita-
tion, demolition, or removal in accordance with this procedure
specified in Chapters 4 through 9 o6= the Uniform Fire Code for
the abatement of dangerous buildings or by any other procedures
provided by law.
INVESTIGATIONS
Sett i on 2. 202. Tt fire d(q)ar tment Iha l I i nvest i gate
Orompt 1 v the C,jU °.e, Or i'� i n of e:9r ) and ev('r'v
f i r e occurr i nq in the j_jr i , ,rj i r ? i can i nvc) l v i ny i of l i f e or in-
j .j r y t_o 9Orr or do ,t - r. t ic Or ( j,jrr,.j 1r� t, - > F)r- ;F)r•r t y ,3nrj, i f i t
saI
appears to the bureau of investigation that such fire is of
suspicious origin, they shall then take imrT,ediate charge of all
physical evidence relating to the cause of the fire and shall
pursue the investigation to its conclusion.
The poiice department shall assist the fire department in
its investigations whenever requested to do so, unless otherwise
directed by the chief of police.
REC AND REPORTS
Section 2.203(a) Fire Occurrences. The fire department
shall keep a record of all fires occurring within its jurisdic-
tion and of all facts concerning the same, including statistics
as to the extent of such fires and the damage caused thereby,
together with such other information as ray be required by the
chief.
Section 2.203(b) Record Retention. The fire prevention
bureau shall retain for not less than three years a record of
each inspection and investigatior. made showing the cause, the
findings, and disposition of each such inspection or investiga-
tion.
ORDERS NOTICES A T AGS
Section 2.204(a) General. Whenever the chief or his duly
authorized representative shall find in any building or on any
premises combustible. hazardous, or explosive materials or dan-
ge+ous accumulations of rubbish; or unnecessary accumulationE of
waste paper, boxes, shavings or any highly flammable materials
which are so situated as to endanger life or property; or shall
find obstructions to which are so situation as to endanger life
or property; or snall find obstructions to or on fire escape=,
stairs, passage'ways, doors or windows that reasonably tend to in-
terfere witty the operations of the fire department or t1ie egress
of the occupants of such building or premises; or shall find that
the cf'factivene55 of any exit door, attic set,aration, or any fire
jr,jt i or, w,j 1 I i s reduced; or sha t I f i nd t hat th i s code i s be i ng
V i (: I at#,d, f_)t. sha I 1 i s - .ie ordf as m. j y t) (7 necessary for the en- 0
forcement of the fire prevention laws and ordinances governing
the same and for the safeguarding of life and property from fire.
Section 2.204(b) Unsafe Heating or Electrical Equipment and
Structure Hazards. Whenever the chief or his duly authorizer!
representative deems any chimney, smokestack, stove, oven, in-
cinerator, furnace or other heating device, electrical fixture or
any appurtenance thereto, or any thing regulated under a na-
tionally approved standard in or uoon any building, structure o:
premises not specifically mentioneb in this code, to be defective
or unsafe so as tc create an immediate hazard, he shall serve
upon the owner or the person having control of the property a
written notice to repair or alter as necessary and shall notify
any other authority Enforcing rode regulating such equipment he
may affix a condemnation tag prohib'ting the use thereof until
such repairs or alterations are rude. When affixed, such tag may
be removed only by the order of the chief or his duly authorized
representative and may be removed only when the hazard to which
the order pertains has been eliminated in an approved manner, un-
til removed, that item or device which has caused the hazard
shall not be used or be permitted to be used.
When an apparent structural hazard is caused by the faulty
installation, operation or malfunction of any of the herein above
mentioned items or devices, the chief shall immediately notify
the building official who shall investigate such hazard and shall
cause such hazard to he abated as required under the Uniform
building Code.
Section 2.204(c) Stopping Uses, Evacuation. The chief may
order the operation or use stopped, or the evacuation, of any
premises, building or vehicle or portion thereof which has or is
a fire hazard.
Section 2.204(d) Every o. der or notice shall set forth a
time Iimit for compl ianLe dependent upon the hazard and danger
c ed by tree vioI 'on .
•
S
S-423
S ERVICE OF ORDERS AND NOTICES
Section 2.205. Any order or notices authorized or required
by this code shall be given or service upon the owner, operator,
occupant or other person responsible fo- the condition or viola-
tion either by verbal notification, personal service, or by
delivering the same to, and leaving it with some person of
suitable age and discretion upon the premises; or, 1f no such
person is found on the premises, by affixing a copy thereof in a
conspicuous place on the door to the entrance of said premises
and my mailing a copy thereof to such r-erson by registered or
certified mail to his last known address. Orders or notices
which are given verbally shall be confirmed by service in writing
as herein provided.
•
•
Sty _,
MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
Jerry Babb
Fire Marshall
FIRE P:�E,'; EVT1 )N'
1-' +39
F. Prevention Inspe.cti
Inspections wr- arm come :ctej as part of code enforcement
help provi3e an: ens..re satisfactory life safety conditions
within a struct.re. Tney incl inspection of the condition
of exits and interior finish, the coeration of exit doors,
emergency exit lights and signs, and all fire
doors. Inspection of exiting `3ciIi.ties should incl>>de the
inspectior. of exit ri char _e
Inspections are intender tc from occurring
beca'ise the _nspector i.jentitie.i f ?r? hazarrS which Could
Ca'.Se a fire, 3113W a fire t 3 or aIlow a fire to
soce3d on_= _�i In 3 ?.i[ :D to locating and correcting
Possible firs :3ise3, the Shoul: check the
acclmulat :cn c:sti :ale
--r33 -, 3n.7 rebris, storage
praCticeo r 73inten3n °_, 3n the :3? f? 'operation of
bu:ldin
-
I^.S';?' _ _ -: ' _:-:° _ r .3'_11.3 or7, operation, and
77 7 __ ? :C -'? _:re s, s "stems, and
3: .:3 _._. ^e inspection process
'3 '3ch. fire protection system
7 ynnunci3t1on, notification,
i..;')ry switches, and fire
-. 3 as part of the
:ec tion fea t,jres,
, 1es sh )ulr receive testing
:n,i1functions due to
r._:. ...j_ x_1n .ishers should be
- zn3n e '- stingy, and
j1 in' ,r-na.ti•�n on th
s F� _ )11-c _ - ghen
I ;'__ r h 311-1 3
i ?. i -I - r. r.:ni
Public fire education affects a fundamental change in the
way the general public viewq fire. It encourages people to
act in firesafe ways. The public needs to be motivated and
instructed in how to take actions tnat minimize the chances
of fire and that minimize the dangerous effects of , fire,
should one occur.
Fire investigation is a major objective of the fire
prevention program. Discovering the causes of firas within
our community is the basis for estaolishing fire prevention
program priorities and providing public fire education
information. The thorough investi;,a�i�n of fires is the
resoonsioilities of the fire depart.-lent to find the cause
and determination and to bring criminal action t the
person or persons who have contributa,? to 3 fire.
524
0 Inspections 1989
Mound
1. Ganzel Suns - 4309 Bartlett Boulevard
2. Perfect Ten Nails - 4844 Bartlett Boulevard
3. Pam's Props - 4505 Bartlett Boulevard
4. Hennepin Cc my Library - 2079 Commerce Boulevard
S. Two Plus Two Jewelry - 2240 Commerce Boulevard
6. Coast to Coact - 2250 Commerce Boulevard
7. Tom's Minnetonka Flooring - 2321 Commerce Boulevard
8. Mound Collision Center. - 2334 Commerce Boulevard
9. Pittsburg Paint - 2365 Commerce Boulevard
10. Masonic Lodge - 2372 Commerce Boulevard
11. Contel Telephone - 2365 Commerce Boulevard
12. VF:J - 2544 Commerce Boulevard
13. Mayer's Service - 2612 Commerce Bouleva
1.3. Bob's Bait - 2530 Commer -e Boulevard
15. Celt :red Mar')le - 2642 ^ommerce Boui
16. House of Moy - 5555 Shoreline Boulevar!
17. Curt Johnson - 5545 S�or ?line Soul ? ✓ar7
13. ;sland Music - 23 - 0 Boulevar:
19. Century Auto od-✓ - ;533 Shor ?line Boulevard
20. Reed .agency - 5424 S-',or ?line Boulevari
21. Toro - 5300 z �lin 1. ?var3
22. CR Manufacturl l7
23. Channel 534 Error - ?.iii o'.1 ?'✓3. -
24. 2 Adn _ -'ri i`i - S 3 .. Jnor2 i :1d _.
25. Ed-:e•.rater 'Iar 3 - 4;3, : ?.3 ~ >r 7�riv�
2^. Union 76 - 4___ -- __✓yr.
27. SCS Printin - ._3 1 1 _ .__ - ,. 3. .
28. Rite Away -i'- - - i _.', rein var.'
29. Jock Club - _ .. _.! Irj
30. Westonka A-__ - ; _:.:r_ -. - �- - ;3
Spring Park
S2
1.
Westonka Mi ._
2.
Minnetonka
3.
Lehman' s '1' ._ ..
, _ - _ r .. _ .
4.
Meisel Prop-
i r
6.
9l ue La ; -
r
Sa le, in 1 ..e
C J ' s 5o 1 : 1
S2
OronosNa va L re
1. Sullivan's 2420 Shadywood Road
2. Lowell's - 3542 2542 Shoreline Boulevard
3. Navarre Hardware - 3400 Shoreline Boulevard
4. Mount Calvary School - Shoreline Boulevard
Miscellaneous Inspections
Westonka Public Schools
1 . Mound •ryes tor.ka - 5905 Sunnyf ie ld Road
2. Grandview Middle School - 1881 Commerce Boulevard
3. Shirley Hills Elementary - 2450 Wilshire Boulevard
4. Hilltop Elementary - 5700 Game Farm Road
.apartments
1. Chapman's Place - 2650 Commerce Boulevard
2. Elmhurst Apartments - 2139 Basswood Lane
3. Indian :moll - 2020 Commerce Boulevard
4. Tonka Apartments - 2009 Commerce - oulevard
5. 3avview Condominiums - 2400 Interlac:nen Road
Summary of Hours
In spections
'!ounJ - 390 Ho .irs
?arx - 125 Hours
5.3
�tinnet�nka Beach - 20 Hours
'•tinnetrista - 10 yours
52.e
Mike Palm - Asst. Fire Marshal
INSPECTIONS FOR 1989
DATE
PLACE
TIME SPENT
Jan 10
Advance Machine
3
hours
Feb 25
Advance Machine
4
hours
Feb 27
Enter Inspection Report into
Computer
3
hours
March
7
Grandview Middle School
4
hours
March
13
Henn. Co. Sheriff's Tower
Tape on Fire call #56
1
hour
March
10
Investigate fire 156
7
hours
March
18
D'Vinci's Restaurant
2
hours
March
20
Investigate fire #56 with
Jeffrey Washinger,Sr.
2
hours
March
21
Reinspect D'Vinci's
1
hour
March
24
Enter Inspection Reports
into Computer
3
hours
March
27
Inspect old Contel Bldg
5
hours
March
28
Go over Blue Prints on
Three Points Project
1
hour
May 2
Inspect City Loo,cs
3
hours
May 9
Inspect Snyder's Drug
3
hours
June 23
Inspect Lord Fletcher's
Subway Sandwich and
Westonka Sanitation
8
hours
9 -27
Toro Co.
1 1
hours
9 -28
Final at Adam S Salon
1
hour
9 -28
Go over Blue Prints of Indian
Knoll Manor for Sprinkler
System Design
2
hours
10 -4
Reir - Toro
2
hours
10 - 5
Manor
1
hour
10 -;
Lr�r�k ever 6alboa Buildir;g for
boat, storage - SFr:rg F'<,rk
4
hours
(64)
1
S''�
('I "IY()f NIO1'N1)
January 17, 1990
TO: MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER
FROM: CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: 1989 ANNUAL REPORT
Personnel Roster:
Francene C. Clark /Leisinger, City Clerk - 8 -30 -81
Linda Strong, Secretary /Receptionist - 8 -5 -85
Linda and I report directly to the City Manager. The City
Manager and I share Linda's time. She is the receptionist first.
Ed has her doing secretarial duties and I have her helping me and
training to be a Deputy Clerk. Linda finished her third year in
the Minnesota Clerks' Institute program. This is a 100 hcur
course put on by the University of Minnesota Continuing
Education. She received her certificate in July.
•
53 1
r�
RECORDING OF COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
There were 23 regular City Council Meetings in 1989. In addition
there were 2 Special Council Meetings including the following:
the Local Board of Review and 1 Special Budget Hearing. That
totals 25 meetings. From these meetings 200 pages of minute.3
were generated for Council review and approval. Agendas are
prepared by the City Manager. I then input the Agenda into the
computer. The Agenda material is then put in order, attached,
and numbered. Linda then runs the packets on the Xerox and
directs the packets to the proper people. We send agendas to all
people who have items on the agenda, highlighting the item
pertaining to them.
After the Council Meetings there are items that need to be
followed up, such as contracts signed and sent to the proper
• people, directives from the Council that need to be attended to
and routine items that need to be resolved. These it-ms many
times are 4 to 6 hours of work after a meeting. That does not
include preparation of the minutes and the resolutions.
MAINTENANCE OF ORDINANCE BOOR
An ordinance is a law of local application, enacted by the City
Council, which prescribes a general and permanent rule for
persons or things within the City. This is distinguished from
other types of regulations or actions which are undertaken by
resolution or motion. Resolutions or motions generally regulate
administrative or temporary actions as opposed to a permanent
law.
•
2 S31
s
An ordinance becomes effective upon its adoption by the City
Council and publication in the official newspaper. Therefore, as
soon after a Council meeting aL; possible, ordinances are
published. After publishing, the new ordinance has to be
integrated into the ordinance book in the correct area.
There were 18 ordinances adopted in 1989.
#21 -1989 An Ordinance Amending Section 255:05 of Lhe City
Code Relating to the Composition of the Park
Advisory Commission.
#22 -1989 An Ordinance Adding Section 155:40 to the Cit}
Code Providing Worker's Compensation for Elected
Officials and Municipal Officers Appointed for a
Regular Term of Office.
#23 -1989 An Ordinance Adding Section 260 to the City Code
Creating an Economic Development Commis. and
Establishing Its Duties.
#24 -1989 An Ordinance Adding Section 311 to the City Code
Relating to Mechanical and Gas Piping Regulations
and Adding Section 520:00, Subsection (i) Relating
to Fees for said Permits and Registration.
#25 -1989 An Ordinan,_,r Amending Sections 311:00 and 311:05
of the City Code Relating to Mechanical an,3 Gas
Piping Permits and Registration of Contractors.
:j�r -1989 An Ordinance Rezoning Certain Land_, f ro:
( fJ -3 ) to
53 2--
#27 -1989 An Ordinance Amending Section 170 of the City Code
by Adding Sections 170:15, 170:20, 170:25 and
170:30 Relating to Unclaimed, Lost or Abandoned
Property.
#28 -1989 An Ordinance Amending Section 905:00 of the City
Code, Adding Subdivision 5A Relating to the
Possession of Knives on School Grounds.
#29 -1989 An Ordinance Repealing Sections 1000:05, 1000:10
and 1000:15 Relating to Nuisances and Abatement in
Their Entirety and Replacing Them with Revised
Sections 1000:05A, 1000:10A and 1000:15A Relating
to Nuisances and Abatement.
#30 -1989 An Ordinance Amending Section 330:120, Subdivision
2, 3 and 5 Relating to Park Dedication
Requirements for Subdivisions.
#31 -1989 An Ordinance Amending Section 468:10 of the City
Code Relating to Games of Skill Licenses.
#32 -1989 An Ordinance Amending Section 800:C5, Subdivision
3, of the City Code Relating to On -Sale Wine
Licenses.
#33 -1989 An Ordinance Amending .Section 800:10, Subdivisions
7 and 8 of the Mound City Code Relating to
Insurance for Liquor Establishments.
#34 -1989 An Ordinance ReauIat.ing '.'rc:;f,,i ;eES; and
Congregating on Esusiness /Municip,il
and P r i v a t e Bu!, i noss
4 3,33
0
#35 -1989 An Ordinance Amending Section 810:10, Subdivision
2 (a) , of the Mound City Code Relating to
Liability Insurance.
#36 -1989 An Ordinance Amending Sections 255:05 and 2� ":10
Relating to Qualifications for Park Advisory ind
Economic Development Commissions.
#37 -1989 An Ordinance Amending Section 300:25, Subd. 3 cf
the City Code Relating to Building Moving.
#38 -1989 An Ordinance Amending Section 437 :15 of the City
Code Relating to Dock Design Standards.
As Chapters in the City Code are amended, I am putting these on
the computer, a disk for each Chapter. This will make revisions
much faster than typing whole pages. 0
MAINTENANCE OF RESOLUTION ROOK
A resolution is somewhere between a motion and an ordinance. A
resolution deals with matter of a special, administrative or
temporary nature and is put in resolution form beca-�;e of its
importance or length. In 1589, thc. City Council adopted 164
resolutions. These are all composed, typed, signed and kept in
resolution books. Each resolution is then categorized and
indexed by subject and number in order to make them easier to
find at a later date. Copies of thy= resolutions are given to the
various departments when they pertain to their area. I also
certify resolutions to be recorded at fienncpin County if
required.
•
5 31
ELECTIONS
1989 was not an election year for Mound, but there are stil._
items that have to be done dealing with voter registration.
There were 379 new voter registrations in 1989. These cards are
sent to Hennepin County to be put on their computer, �iven a
Voter Identification Number and a mailed notice is sent to each
new registrant to verify their residence. When the cards are
returned, Linda has to check each card against the computer list
to be certain Hennepin County has inputted the proper
information. She then numbers each card with the voter
identification number, assigned by th-- County, and files them
alphabetically.
In 1989, there were 3,6"5 voter registration transactions
processed by Hennepin County for the City of Mound. Some of
these originate here, some in other municipalities and some at
Hennepin County. The comparison between 1988, a presidential
election year, and 1989, a year when only the school district
held an election is as follows:
1988 198
Additions
1,273
379
Data Change
306
219
Name Change
294
156
out of County - Deletes
139
115
Transfers (people who
moved within the
County) 682
255
Deceased Persons
16
31
Moved Deletes
253
214
Complete Deletes
13
45
Date Last 'Doted updates
7
2,261
'FOTA1,
10,500
3,675
6 S.3S
i
I am one of 11 City Clerks chosen to serve on the Hennepin County
Elections and Voter Registration Coordinating Committee. It is
comprised of clerks giving good city representation of the county
based on experience, the size of the municipalities and the types
of election system used. This Committee deals with new
legislation affecting elections and voter registration.
The last two years I have been on the League of Minnesota Cities
Elections and Ethics Committee. In 1989 there was proposed
legislation to establish a Minnesota local government election
day. Some of the major features of this legislation are as
follows:
Establishes the - Monday in November of odd -
numbered years as Minnesota local government election
day.
Requires all county, city, township, schcol district
and all political subdivision offices be filled in that
election schedule.
Requires all ballot questions to be voted on by the
political jurisdictions listed above to be placed or,
the ballot only on local government election day.
Requires use of the same precincts and polling
locations established under Minnesota election law and
provides that voters must be able to vote at a single
location.
Supersedes all local laws and charter provisions
related to elections.
Sib
If the Legislature enacts a statewide date for local government
g g
elections the following features must be included:
1. Statutory cities must retain the option of choosing the
odd or even year for the elections.
2. All direct costs of state - mandated ch,�nges and
additions to current city election duties must be paid
by the sta':.
3. Decisions to combine school district elections and
municipal elections must be made by city councils and
school boards.
PUBLIC NOTICES
This office arranges for the publication of official and legal
notices for such things as public hearings, changes in meeting
dates for the City Council, ordinances, and any other items that
are required by State Statutes or that the Council or City
Manager feel should be in the official newspaper.
Some public notices (vacating of streets, etc.) must also be
posted in 3 public places. The Park Dept. handles the posting
and fills out the posting affidavit.
Some bids come through my office and are advertised according to
State Statute. Some of the specifications for bids for equipment
are laid out and prepared by me with inp,it from the specific
department head requesting the item.
•
8 S37
LICENSES 6 PERMITS
The City of Mound issued 97 licenses or permits for 23 different
purposes in 1989. This accounted for approximately $9,120.00 in
revenues. Gayle Burns in the Finance Department spends a
considerable amount of time in the administration of the licenses
and permits, i.e. notices and renewal forms are sent before they
expire; when the renewal application is received it and the
insurance papers must be gone over to be sure they are correct;
the payment receipt is made out; the names submitted to the
Council for review and approval; the license issued and sent to
the a?)plicant. Then there are always the applicants who wait
until the last minute or have to be coaxed to get their
applications and fees in before expiration.
PUBLIC INFORMATI
I have found being City Clerk that people expect me to be the
local expert in everything from utility costs to the legality of
the latest zoning fracas. In attending State and International
conferences I find that most city clerks are used as an
information source by local citizen3. I try to stay informed as
to what is going on in all aspects and departments of the City so
that if I cannot answer a question for a citizen at lea�;t I can
direct them to the proper person for an answer.
What comes along with public information is research into various
items that people have concerns about.
•
•
0
5IS 9
�J
REC MANAG
Records Management is a function concerned with she creation,
processing, maintenance, protection, retrieval, retention,
preservation and disposition of records required in the operation
and continuance of city operations. The objective is to save
space, money and time. Storage space in City Hall is a very
limited commodity.
The City owns a microfiche recorder (samara), film processor and
a dry ink reader /printer. We have been using this equipment for
Police records that must be kept and require too much space; for
all old permanent records of the City Council i.e., resolutions,
minutes, etc. We will continue to work at this in 1990.
TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY
Iii 1989, I dealt with 10 tax forfeit parcels of land.
4 parcels were released to sale to adjoining property
owners;
4 parcels were conveyed to the City for park /wetlands,
drainage, or unbuil6 -ible;
2 parcels were released for public auction;
Hennepin County notifies us of property within the City that has
gone tax forfeit because of nonpayment of real estate taxes.
They also periodically ask about property we have taken for a
public purpose to insure that we are using it for tnat public
purpose. The County a�.ks that we inform them of what we would
like done with the property i . e. , allow the parcels to the sold
at public auction; require that they be sold only to adjoining
property owners if they are undersized or do not meet the zoning
and building codes; or retain them for somc public purpose.
10 S31
0
There is a considerable amount of resea -ch that must be done to
determine what should be done with the property.
The first step is to go to the tax books and get a property
description. Then 'he property jacket is pulled and its contents
exImined to see if the property was taken for a public purpose or
is a new tax forfeit parcel.
The next step is to figure the square footage of the property and
look at the current zoning district to determine if it is a
buildable lot or not. After all this information is determined,
it is all put on a sheet, a plat map showing the property is made
and sent to the City Engineer, Park Director, Street
Superintendent, Sewer & Water Superintendent, Building Inspection
and Finance Director for their comme. and recommendations.
Occasionally, an easement is needed for utility purposes; a
survey may be needed to determine if part of the property is in
the wetlands; or there may be reasons for the City to retain the
property.
The Special Assessment Clerk in the Finance Dept. determines if
there are any assessments from before forfeiture or since
forfeiture that •red to be put back on the property. The reason
we need to know assessments before and since forfeiture is that
the City gets 90% of the purchase price to apply to assessments
from before forfeiture. The assessments since forfeiture are
added in their entirety to the appraised value (determined by the
Hennepin County Assessor.) of the property. In 19 -.4, !',c City
Council adopted a resolution ( #84 -94, copy attached) s(�tting a
policy on assessments placed on undersized tax forfeit property
before forfeiture. This has helped to encoura(je ad Joining
property owners to purchase undersized parcels - in i ri;ir:c tti� �
with their property.
5 4o 1
•
In 1987 I completed 3 card index by Property Identifi�.ation
Number for the following:
1. City owned property;
2. Tax forfeit property that has been retained by the City
for a public purpose;
3. Tax forfeit property that falls into the following
categories:
a. Property released for public sale;
b. Property for sale only to and combined with
adjoining property.
Each card has a PID (property identifir_ation number) , plat and
parcel, legal description, status (what it is, park, wetlands,
tax forfeit, etc.), whose name it is in (State Land Dept. or City
of Mound or both) , any resolutions dealing with the parcel
(resolution number and disposition) . I have now completed
coordinating the Certificates of Titles, State Deeds, easements,
etc. and recorded that type of information on each card also.
This card file, is now complete and is being kept up--to -date. It
has already proved to be a very valuable tool when somecne calls
in to check on a parcel of land.
Since we started dealing with tax f property in 1982:
34 parcels have been put tip to public auction;
25 parcels were retained for a public purpo:�e; and
79 parcels have been authorized to he sold to .and combined
with adjoining properties;
5 temporary con_-,truction easements were r c r;vrrrF 3.
•
1
Sys
•
Of the above, 30 parcels of the 34 have been sold at public
auction and 41 of the 79 parcels have been sold to adjoining
property owners to be combine with their property. I think this
shows how this process is working to the city's advantage to get
parcels back on the tax rolls and increase conformance to the
zoning ordinance.
We now have a computer program called Rapid File and I am trying
to get all this information on tax forfeit property into the
computer. I will continue to work on this during 1990.
OTHER DUTIES /RESPONSIBILITIES
BUDGET:
In 1989, the inputting of all budget pages was done for all
departments. This included all figures for 1988, 1989 and S
inserting all proposed 1990 figures. This year Linda inputted
the proposed 1990 figures because I had a family emergency.
There was also preparation of the Election Budget and joint work
with the City Manager on the City Council Budget and the
Manager /Clerk Budget.
CEMETERY
In 1988, I officially took over the Mound Union Cemetery records.
There were 20 burials in 1989 and 5 graves were sold. All
records for the cemetery were manual and took time to record in
all places necessary. There was a file alphabetically listing
each persons name; division, lot a:id grave location; date of
burial; age; name of funeral home attending. There was another
cross - reference numerical file for each division (A, B or C).
Each card in this file has the division, lot number and grave
numbers. Also on these cards was the name of the owner o: the
S42.., 13
grave and the person buried. We also have a cemetery book
listing the people buried alphabetically with a listing of the
page number they are listed on which gives various information.
In 19 -89, I used the Rapid File program in my computer and
inputted all the information from each division of the cemetery.
All the information came off the cemetery cards which were
checked and cross - checked. I found 6 people who are buried in
the cemetery but were not on the cemetery map. This now allows
us to instantly locate people by name, owner of the grave, or lot
and grave number. There are three divisions and each is separate
on the computer. I have a book that I update every few months.
It took a considerable amount of time to do this but I feel it
has really cut down on the paper work.
We had new cemetery maps made up at the end of 1989 to include
all new information.
FIRE CONTRACT
Linda keeps track of all fire reports for each contracting city.
The fire reports are all listed according to the City and the
number of fire /rescue hours. In 1989, there were 160 mutual aid
hours which are divided equally between the contracting cities.
The fire Contract Material is figured on a combination percentage
of assessed value and a 3 year average of fire /rescue hours for
each contracting city. That percentage is then used on:
A. Operating Costs
B. Capital outlay
C. Fireman's Relief Fund
D. Fire Truck Payments
•
14 543
In 1989, the fire hours breakdown is as follows:
ACTUAL EQUAL
CONTRACTING FIRE /RESCUE MUTUAL AID
CITY HOURS + HOURS - TOTAL PERCENTAGE
Minnetonka
Beach
313
+
26.6;
= 339.67
4.28%
Minnetrista
931
+
26.67
957.67
12.08%
Orono
1328
+
26.67
= 1,354.67
17.08%
Shorewood
34
+
26.67
- 60.67
.77%
Spring Park
751
+
26.67
= 777.67
9.81%
Mound
4,412
+
26.67
= 4,438.67
55.98
TOTAL
7,769
+
160.02
= 7,929.02
100.00%
•
These hours will be integrated into the 3 year average when the
1991 contract material is figured.
Part of the formula for figuring the fire contracts was to use
the total assessed value of the fire area in a community. This
changed this year from assessed value to market value, which did
not change the percentages much but required some language change
in the original fire contracts and at the same time this was done
some other changes were made to update the contract for each fire
contracting city.
EMPLOYEE SUPERVISION
The City Manager and I supervise the Secretary /Receptionist,
Linda Strong. As I stated in the beginning of this report, Ed
and I share Linda's time. Linda is first and foremost the
receptionist who answers the phone anywhere from 60 to 80 times a
day, fielding calls to the proper people, taking messages when
•
•
Soy 15
•
people are out of the office and directing people when they come
into City Hall. She sometimes the only contact a citizen has
with City Hall and shu is excellent in giving people a positive
and helpful image of the City of Mound.
She does a lot of typing for departments who do not have
secretarial help, i.e. Finance, Liquor, Fire and the Dock
Inspector. She is also in charge of handling all incoming and
outgoing mail; copying for various departments; keeping the fire
reports for all the cities and checking them against the non`h-
end sheets from the Fire Department; office supply ordering; as
well as the duties that were mentioned before. We are lucky to
have someone who is versatile, talented and friendly.
• MINNESOTA WVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES A CT
I drafted a public document containing procedures for the City of
Mound to follow in administering the Minnesota Government. Data
Practices Act (Data Privacy). This was reviewed by the City
Attorney and adopted by the City Council in November.
COMPUTER INPUT AND TRANSCRIPTION
The Police Policies & Procedures Manual was on the old computer
system. Since nobody but Linda has the old computer system it
was hard for the Police Dept. to update the manual. In 1989 1
started and completed putting the manual on the near system so
that the Police Department can do their own updating. The manual
is 309 pages.
is
16 s 4s
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 0
In September assessment hearing notices were prepared, the tax
books checked to verify names and addresses and notices were
written, published and sent to all parties concerned regarding
the following:
CBD (Central Business District) Parking Maintenance
Unpaid Tree Removal Charges
Unpaid Mowing Charges
Delinquent water & Sewez Charges
Drummond Road Street Improvement
Unpaid Removal of Deck on Commons
Unpaid Clean -Up Charges
Unpaid Removal of Hazardous Building
Unpaid Consultant Services fcr Hazardous Building
The CBD Assessmenc Roll is a very involved procedure. The
expenses are figured from June 1 of a given year until May 31 of
the year being assessed. This figure includes expenses for
railroad lease, special assessments, maintenance materials,
crosswalks striping, blacktopping of lots, Christmas decorations,
lighting of lots, parking lot leases, salaries for maintenance.
This figure is sent to each business in the CBD District. There
is a very complicated formula for spreading these expenses
between the businesses in the Central Business District. The
formula is based on the following:
1. Customer parking spaces required (this is deterroined by
the CBD Parking Committee based on the busines
2. Employee parking spaces required.
3. The number of spares provided by the busines!�.
4. The first 2 items are added together and thc+ '.gird is
subtracted. 0
5 46 1
Resolutions were prepared for all the above assessments. Levy
• sheets were prepared for Hennepin County, resolutions certified
and all sent to the County tc appear on the 1989 tax statements.
SPECIAL PROJECT
The Park Commission wanted to look at all properties that had
wetlands. I prepared half section maps showing all the wetlands
in the City. A list was then prepared of the owners of this
property (private of public) and any owners surrounding the
wetlands.
•
18 541
5.
A ercenta e of the
p g
total is then figured c
g n item #4.
6.
The business front
footage is then taken.
7.
A percentage or the
total is then figured on item #6.
8.
The present market
value is then taken.
9.
A percentage of the
total is then figured on item #P.
10.
Next the total costs (expenses) are multiplied by the
factor .7 and that
result is multiplied by i,em #5.
11.
Next the total costs (expenses) are multiplied by the
factor .15 and that
result is multiplied by item #7.
12.
Next the total costs
(expenses) are multiplied by
factor .15 and that
result is multiplied by item -9.
13.
Items 10, 11 and 12
are then added together and that is
what is proposed to
be assessed to each business in the
CBD.
Resolutions were prepared for all the above assessments. Levy
• sheets were prepared for Hennepin County, resolutions certified
and all sent to the County tc appear on the 1989 tax statements.
SPECIAL PROJECT
The Park Commission wanted to look at all properties that had
wetlands. I prepared half section maps showing all the wetlands
in the City. A list was then prepared of the owners of this
property (private of public) and any owners surrounding the
wetlands.
•
18 541
OTHER _MEETINGS ATTENDED
MCF OA Minnesota clerks, 6Fi Of ficers_! A ssociation) Annual
Mec�ti_nc1
I have been a member of this organization since 1982. I was
Regional Vice President for Region IV in 1984; Treasurer in 1985;
Secretary in 1986; Vice President in 1987; became the President
in 1998; and a Director at Large (Immediate Past President) 1990.
This state organization has one annual conference in March which
is put on by the University of Minnesota Department of
Professional Development and Conference Services. It is designed
to meet the needs of Minnesota clerks from large, small and
medium size cities, with different responsibilities, and with
varying years of experience. The technical sessions provide
practical information and an opportunity for discussion with
other clerks.
I received the title of MCMC (Minnesota Certified Municipal
Clerk) in March 1 .985 after completing the required courses and
extra seminars offered by the University of Minnesota Continuing
Education.
Out of the 855 cities in Minnesota there are over 550 memb , 3rs in
MCFOA.
IIMC __SI Institute of Munic C lerks) Confere
I have
been a (CMC) Certified
Municipal Clerk since November
1985.
The State of Minnesota
presently has over 345
member
cities
in the IIMC. We are 8th out of 75 (including
the 50
states,
12 C provinces,
and 13 other countries
such as
Australia,
New Zealand, Israel,
United Kingdom, South
Africa,
Japan)
in membership to IIMC.
Total IIMC membership
is over
5,42 19
•
9,619 up 515 over 1988.
I attended the annual IIMC Conference from May 21 - May 27. The
theme this year was "Challenges of the 1990's" and was reflected
in the variety of topics covered in the educational sessions,
presentations and the extensive exhibits. This was a very
interesting and beneficial conference with over 40 different
workshops in excellence in local government, records management,
local government productivity, elections, professional
development, personnel management, communications, supervising,
to name a few.
IIMC (INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL CLERKS) REGION VI
MEETINGB
I attended 2 Region vI Meetings in 1987. Normally there would
only be one and it is usually held in the Fall of the year but
the 1986 meeting was not held until January of 1937. The
meetings are held in LaCrosse, Wisconsin because it is central to
the three states (Iowa, Wisconsin and Minnesota) in our region.
As I am an Executive Board member of the MCFOA (Minnesota Clerks'
& Finance Officers' Association) it is important for me to attend
these meetings to be able to bring back current information on
IIMC to the state level. The expenses for attendance at these
meetings was paid for entirely by MCFOA because I am a board
member.
Some of the other meetings attended were:
- League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Conference;
- A number of Governmental Affairs Meetings put on by the
Westonka Area Chamber of Commerce.
- League of Minnesota Cities Elections & Ethics
1 0 Committee.
20 S-47
•
1990 Census meeting.
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities legislative
meeting.
- Several meetings with BRC (Business Records
Corporation) on the Optec IIIP ✓oting machine
maintenance agreements.
Several MCFOA Region IV meetings.
I have tried to highlight some of the activities in 1989. In
summation, the City Clerk's position encompasses many areas that
require time, effort and knowledge beyond that of a clerk in a
larger city with a full staff to do the elementary tasks. I find
the work very challenging and personally rewarding and I am happy
I can contribute to Mound and its citizer- I feel continuing
education, working on various committees with affiliated
organizations, receiving and sharing information with other
cities makes me more effective in my position and I want to thank
the Council for their support.
fc
•
S.50 21
132
June 12, 1984
• RESOLUTION NO. 84-94
RESOLUTION SETTING A POLICY ON ASSESSMENTS
PLACED ON TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY BEFORE FORFEITURE
WHEREAS. Hennepin County has begun to notify adjacent
property owners that they will be conducting "private sales" on
undersized or unbuildable lots; and
WHEREAS, some of these properties had assessments
against them before forfeiture which were cancelled at the time
of forefeiture; and
WHEREAS, when the City releases these parcels for
Private sale, it certifies these assessments from before
forfeiture to Hennepin County because the City receives 80% of
the value of the property (selling price) to apply to the '):d
assessments; and
WE=EREAS, the assessments since forfeiture are added to
the appraised value so the City receives all the funds for those
assessments; and
WHEREAS, some of the assessments from before forfeiture
are higher than the property is valued at and thus does not make
the property very attractive to adjoining property owners unless
we make a com mittment to them that we will not reassess the
remaining balance of the assessments after they purchase the
property; and
WHEREAS, the goal is to get the property back on the tax
role and help a number of people make their property conforming.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the fog lowing
policy which will apply only to undersized tax forfeit lots which
are sold thru Hennepin County and combined with adjoining
property:
1. On undersized tax forfeit lots which had assessments
before forfeiture, the City will certify these
assessments to Hennepin County when the lots are
released for private sale to adjoining property
owners. This will be done only so that the City
will receive 80% of the value of the lot to be
applied against these before forfeiture assessments.
2. After certain undersized tax forfeit lots are sold
and combined with adjoining property, the owner may
petition the City Council to pass a resolution
stating that the balance of the assessments from
before forfeiture will not be recertified to
S S/
June 12, 1984
Hennepin County for collection.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Charon and seconded by Councilmember Paulsen. 0
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Charon, Jessen, Paulsen and Polston.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Councilmember Peterson was absent and excused.
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
•
•
SSA.
•
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
Case No. 90 -904
RESOLUTION #90-
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ALLOW
A FRONT YARD SETBACE VARIANCE FOR
LOT 18, BLOCK 6, THE HIGHLANDS, BID #23- 117 -24 -43 0031,
(6017 Ridgewood Road), PiZ CASE NO. 90 -904
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a 29 foot front yard
setback variance to allow construction of a one story garage ad-
dition to an existing attached two stall, one story, garage, for
Lot 18, Block 6, The Highlands, PID ##23- 117 -24 -43 0031, and
WHEREAS, a variance was previously granted for this property
in 1974, Resolution ##74 -261, allowing a lot area of 8,027 square
feet, a 5 foot front yard setback, a 6 foot and 10 foot side yard
setback and a 50 foot (plus) lakeshore setback, and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R -1
Single Family Zoning District which according to the City Code
requires a lot area of 10,000 square feet, a 30 foot front yard
setback, a 50 foot lakeshore setback, and a 10 and a 6 foot side
yard setback for "lots of record ", and
WHEREAS, Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) provides that al-
terations may be made to a building containing a lawful, noncon-
forming residential property when the alterations will improve
the livability thereof, but the alteration may not increase the
number of units, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request
and does recommend approval due to topography and shape of the
lot.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City does hereby authorize a front yard setback of 1
foot for the property located at Lot 18, Block 6, The High-
lands, PID ##23- 117 -24 -43 0031.
2. The City Council authorizes the existing nonconforming lot
size and structural setback violations and authorizes the
alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 23.404,
Subdivision (8) with the clear and express understanding
• that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject
to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404.
5753
40
PROPOSED RESOLUTION
Page Two
CASE NO. 90 -904
3. It is determined that the livability of the residential
property will be improved by the authorization of the fol-
lowing alterations to a nonconforming use of the property to
afford the owner reasonable use of his land.
a. To construct a one story pie shaped garage addition ap-
proximately 840 square feet in size, setback 1 foot
from the front property line (approximately 12 from
the curb) per Exhibit A.
Upon the condition that 70% of the garage will be below
grade, with only 2 to 4 feet of the buildinq visible at
street level.
4. This variance is granted for property legally described as:
Lot 18, Block 6, The Highlands, PID #23- 117 -24 -43 0031 (6017
Ridgewood Road).
This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or •
the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Min-
nesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This
shall be considered a restriction on how this property may
be used.
5. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing
this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs
for such recording. The building permit shall not be issued
until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk.
•
ssy
r
n
r,
s
f�
r
rP
0 1 • � r
r
i
Exh1
C ,r
,
P o Qjt 1N v P .\
r
° tit
vt y
c \
0
�0
F
r� l"
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
February 12, 1990
C . Case No. 90-904: Gene i Brenda Peterson, 6017 Ridgewood
Road, Lot 19, Block 6, The H PID 123- 117 -24 -4
0031. VARIANCE: Front Yard Setback.
Building Official, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the applicants request
to construct a one story garage addition onto the existing two
stall attached garage within one foot of the front property line.
Bertrand explained that a variance was granted for this property
in 1974 which allowed a lot area of 8,027 square feet, a 5 foot
front yard setback, 6 foot and 10 foot side yard setbacks, and a
50 foot (plus) lakeshore setback. The property has approximately
a 20 percent slope towards the lakeside and the shape of the
front property is a triangle which makes it difficult to setback
a structure to the 30 foot setback with a 20 percent grade. The
concrete driveway is presently encroaching onto the neighbors
property. If storage is the intended use of this addition, there
is room for an accessory building to be constructed on the
lakeside of the property. She also commented that there are
electric power transmission lines along the str °yet front of the
property. Staff recommended that the variance Le denied.
Ow.ler and applicant, Gene Peterson, spoke on his behalf. Mr.
Peterson reported to the commission that he is only attempting to
mimic the layout of the garage next door which is setback closer
to the curb than his proposed structure. He stated that 70% of
the garage will be below grade, with only 2 to 4 feet of the
building visible at street level. Mr. Peterson suggested that
the fill which will be removed to construct the addition,
(approximately 80 cubic yards) could be added to the berm at the
street side to help hide the structure. His intended use for the
garage addition is vehicle storage, therefore, the suggestion by
th- Building Inspector to construct a storage shed at the lake
s..ie is not feasible. The NSP wires which are erected at the
7)treet side are high enough that the garage should nct interfere.
Mr. Peterson proceeded to distribute photographs of neighboring
properties stating that he will be further away from the curb
than any of the other homes, in addition, a variance was granted
•
5 L
for the structure three doors to the west of his home. Bertrand
pointed out that ore of the garages was constructed without a
variance as it complied with the setback requirements for
deteched accessory buildings. She reminded the commission that a
•
de'. garage built on a lakeshore lot can be setback 8 feet
from the front piiperty line if the doors face the side lot line.
Mueller questioned the type of tree which stands where the
proposed garage will be erected. Peterson stated that the tree
is a maple, and it is in poor shape since NSP trims branches
yearly to keep it away from the power lines.
Mueller commented about the curve on Ridgewood Road at the sub-
ject property, and questioned visibility; will adding to the berm
hinder visibility? The applicant did not feel that a problem ex-
isted.
John Mayer, who is Mr. Peterson's neighbor to the west, stated
that he supports the proposed addition and so do all the other
neighbors. He is also in favor of any upgrading in the neighbor-
hood.
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Voss, to approve the
setback variance to construct an attached garage addi-
tion 1 foot from the front property line as shown on the
plan. Motion carried unanimously.
This case will be heard by the City Council on February 20, 1990.
•
•
ss7
...................
11 C' F FY () I N RA "N 1)
CASE NO. 90 -904
TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
iROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official
DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of Februa 12. 1990
CASE NO.: 90 -904
APPLICANT: Gene 9 Brenda Peterson
LOCATION: 6017 Ridgewood Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 18, Block 6. The Highlands
PID #23- 117 -24 -43 0031
SUBJECT: Front Yard Setback Variance
EXISTING ZONING: R -I Single Family Residential
PROPOSAL: The applicants are proposing to add a one story extension onto an
existing 24' x 26' attached garage within I foot of the front property Iine.
Photos were taken which will be distributed during the Planning Commission
meeting. 0
COMMENTS: The R -I zoning district requires a 10,000 square foot lot area, a
30 foot front yard setback, 50 foot lakeshore setback, and 10 foot and 6 foot
side yard setbacks for lots of record. A variance was granted for this
property in 1974, resolution #74 -261, which allowed a lot area of 8,027 square
feet ( + / -), a 5 foot front yard setback, 6 foot and 10 foot side yard set-
backs, and a 50 foot plus lakeshore setback (line of site provision). The
front_ yard and lot area are the only nonconforming aspects for the current
zoning regulations. The property slopes from the Ridgewood right -of -way to
lakeshore approximately 32 feet in 170 feet (20 percent slope approx.). The
shape of the front property is a triangle which makes it difficult to access
the lot and setback a structure to the 30 foot setback with a 20 percent
grade. Due to the shape of the proposed addition to the structure, it would
probably be used for storage of personal belongings. The concrete driveway is
presently encroaching onto the neighbors property. There would be a pos-
sibility of constructing an accessory building above the flood plain at the
lakeshore side with a 4 foot side yard setback for storage of personal belong-
ings except vehicles. There are electric power transmission lines along the
street front of the property.
RECOMMENDATION: Even though the neighbors have constructed an attached garage
approximately at the property line with a berm concealing it from the street
when the house was built in 1963, 1 would recommend that this variance be
denied. The present berm to Ridgewood Road would basically be removed by the
expansion of the existing attached garage and it is possible to ado an acces-
sory building at the lakeshore side for storage of personal belongings.
S S 8 The abutting neighbors have been notified. This case will be referred to the
City Council on February 20. 1990.
t
JAN 3 0
32
0 3(c #RP
F 1 .,
t
A ITY OF MOUND PART 11 Case No.A 904
Date F i 1 ed 1 "30 90
Fee_ �50�00__ _
V ARIANCE A PPLICATION
PLANNING b ZONING COMMISSION
(Please type or print the following Information.)
Address of Subject Property , C>J? R X hG1r 1zop.6
Lot y Block
Addition 10i a�� _ P10 No. 2 `;t HJ0 031
Owner's Name e + C P e: � CIL500 Day Phone 1 6
Owner's Address 5C me. G,S
Applicant's Name (if other than owner) :5t1 n7e-
Rddress__ _ Day Phone_
�x I st i ng Use of Property: ti_ „ �
Zoning District_ /J _
Has an application ever beer, made for zoning, var 35 conditlonal use
permit, or other zoning procedure for this propert.! yes . If yes,
list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolution number(s)
(Copies of previous resolutions mtj;.. accompany thl; application.)
1 certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in
any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac-
curate. 1 consent to the entry in or Upon the ,premises described in this
application by any authorized officia' of the City of Mound for the purpose
of Inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may
De required by law.
s
Appl (cant's Signature '_� � � _ Date Ol - W- 0 t o
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
Planning Commissicn Recommendation
Date
0 ounc i I Act ion: ----
Resolution No.
Date
S,S7
VARIANCE APPLICATION Case No. —� "qtL'J 0
I. Does the present use of the property conform to all requIatIons for
the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (>O , No ( ). If no,
specify each non- conforming
2. 00 the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and
setback regulations for the zoning district in which it Is located?
Yes ( ) , No M. . I f no, specify each non-conforming � � j use
ARo 4r)g C nr 5 ��c � wAS�4 � Q� C0 „2Sf(LAd d+"0 -
ff
i Cr AAL0k.S Q — —
3. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent
its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning
district?
( ) too narrow (x ) topography ( ) soil
( ) too srraII ( ) Drainage ( ) sub - surface
( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify 40
&-2e P 9�� .ye &-
CAL
\.J
4. Was the hardship described above created by the action of an%one
having property interests In the land after the zon'^1 ordinancz was
adopted? Yes ( ), No (N . If yes, explain
5. Was the hardship created by any other man -made change, such as the
relocation of a road? Yes ( ) , No ( >0 . If yes, explain
•
SLo
O ARiANCE APPLICATION
Case No._ `10 -CI
6. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance
peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (K).
No ( ). If no, how many other properties are similarly affected?
7. What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area. bulk, and
setback regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of
your land? (Specify. using maps, site plans with dimensions and w�it
ten exp lanation. See- r�RARA �,_- Q� on U1,11, ;�c,tt - �c),� o
v
8. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in
the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance?
1
�j f}lc G '�Z7 ' - ♦;' ►'� � � r4' S � , � _ U C�'14'� t' S i 1.� E:1� �/ R�i O+J � K C
PART [I[
J. SITE PLAN INFORMATION: All supporting documents such as sketch pl
attachments, etc., must be submitted in 8 - 1/2 "x11" size. If larger
drawings are submitted, one must be8 1 /2 "xll ", and 15 larger size
copies must be provided. For each requested zoning variance procedure,
a site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity show-
ing the following lnfcrmation:
v1. Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed: (Lot(s),
building(s). driveway(s) /street access, off - street parking, and
utilities.
L.-2. Existing and proposed elevations.
.-3. Distance between: building and front, side and rear lot lines;
principal building and a7- .essory buildings: principal builaing
and principal buildings on adjacent lots.
+-d. Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities. etc.
.-5. Indicate "north" compass direction.
,,6. Any a d d i t i o n a l information as may reasonably be required by the
city staff and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance.
S 4/
qo -tlo4
the pi oposed garage e;:pansioil will be vei y non - invasive and shoisld
actually improve the aesthetics and curb appeal of the Highlands
neighbovhood for the following reasons.
the expans.o on will virtually match the existing
neighbors' garage, at o033 Ridgewood, immediately
adjacent to the West. The requested setback will be mote
than currently exists on the adjacent proper - ty. Also
the distance setback from the existing curb and gutter
will be greater than on the adjacent property.
the construction will not change a►iy of the existing
home elevations. the expansion area will be excavated
to the elevation of the existing garage.
the expansion will be approximately '10% hidden by the
topography of the lot. The lot rises from the road with
an earth berm, concealing all but the upper poi tioii of
the structure. I*
the construction will eliminate the existinq parkirrq and
storage apron on the north end of the property, making
the area more aesthetically pleasing.
Neighbors' letters of approval to be presented at
planning meeting.
thank you,
A '-V� v 1 4�
hene L. Peterson
•
562
Pla t o f C,'u,-vey
for John T. Appel
of Lot 18, Block. 6, The
Hennepin County, Minr
D�
Certificate of Survey:
1 hereby certify that thi
a true and correct represeni
of a survey of thn boundarie
Lot 16, Bloch 6 The FI gh1Rr
thm location of all exibtinj
buildings, if any, thereun,
the oropoeed locations of t%
proposed buildings. It does
purport to show other iaprrn
or encroachmnnts.
Gordon R. ".offin RPE;. o,
Land Survoyor and i'lnnner
Long bake, Minnesote
Scale: 1" = 40'
Date : P-12-74
e : Iron marker fount
o . Iron marker set
•
i f Ti pM+^
L h-ru4�
SO
74 -261
9 -10-74
•
RESOLUTION N0. 74 -261
RF5 OLUTION GRANTING LOT SIZE, BIDE AND
REAR YARD VARIANCES
(Lot 18, Block 6, The Highlands)
WHEREAS, the owner of Lot 18, Block 6, The Highlands ':ias requested lot
size, side -yard and rear -yard variances in order to build a
garage, and
1H EREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended a lot size variance of
1 sq. ft, a side yard variance of two feet, and a rear yard
variance of three feet with the stipulation that the plans be
followed as presented, and
WHEREAS, it appears to be the beet use of the land,
NW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND,
b;IrTNESOTA:
That the following variances be granted provided all other
riquiremente are met:
1. A lot size variance of 1,500 square feet -
2. A side yard variance of two feet
j. A rear yard variance of three feet.
Adopted by the Council this 10th day of September, 1974.
U
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
August 21 1974
TO i CHAIRMAN AND PLANNING COIMQ.-SION ?U Bt;.RS
FROM: HENRY TRUELiEN
BUBJECTs VARIANCE REQUEST - JOHN T. APPa2N
Lot 16, Block 6, - he Highlands
In reference to a variance for Mr. John T. Appelen for a proposed now
dwelling construction# I would like all members to physically view this
particular situation. The location of both the house and garage is very
critical and unique due to the unusual topography to control drainage and
for ingress and egress to and from a public roadway and also for conformity
to the aesthetic beauty of the neighborhood.
Also be aware that Mr. Appelen had a pre - existing non - conforming structure
on this property which he removed at my request.
My recommendation is to the effect that Mr. Appelen his builder and myself
have spent, considerable time in the adjuatment of the proposed structures
• and feel the variance is not an unusual request; , iowever s we are oper. to
suggestions because of the unusual topography and today's building costa.
I would like to suggest taking with you the information sent to you at the
time of viewing Mr. Appelen's proposal. I also will be available for your
convenience of an on -site inspection.
Re ect 179
Henry K. Truelsen
Inspector
HKTtms
•
.T s
Ax "
fit
4616 CA fo a-
or 10 46
dp
1p
z
�a
e �
•1 t ��` 66
f r,
r � r ,
ti > > N
L ON
at • / oi►
Ot
E
•M
• ��E) �bg a CSI• ���.� �' �a �LQ•► �' o� s� cbi> 1 >N !' �t ct
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION
FEBRUARY S. 1990
•
ONR Application 890 -6173 for a d by Roger Beckel
Park Director, Jim Fackler, reviewed the dredge application
request and presented a copy of a plat map explaining the loca-
tion and dimensions of the proposed dredge. Fackler added that
the Street Superintendent has reviewed the application and added
the following stipulation: The storm sewer outlet must have
Class 3 riprap spill way, riprap must be cemented together, also
must pass Watershed District specifications.
Casey raised a concern pertaining to wetlands, he pointed out
that the subject area Is designated as a Wetlands Area #1 on the
City of Mound Wetlands Map. and the map does not indicate that
our ordinance does not apply to Area #l. He questioned how to
interpret the ordinance, does the City have Jurisdiction of this
area?
MOTION made by Casey that the Park Commission recommends
approval of ONR Application #90 -6173 and request the
City Attorney give an opinion as to the applicability of
Wetlands Area #1 as it relates to the Wetlands Or-
dinance. There being no second, motion failed.
•
Jessen commented that she has always understood that wetlands
which abut the lake are treated as lake, therefore controlled by
the ONR. Casey commented, that if that is the way the City in-
terprets the ordinance, then it should be amended since he feels
the wetlands ordinance applies to Area #1 as it is now written.
MOTION made by Casey. seconded by Jessen, to approve ONR
Application #90 -6173. Motion carried unanlmously.
MOTION made by Casey. seconded by Bailey, that the Park
Commission requests the City Attorney's opinion if Wet-
land Area's I 2, and 3, fall within the City's Wetlands
Ordinances and, how does the Mound Wetlands Ordinance
and .,tate regulacions governing Wetlands inter - relate,
if at all. Motion carried with 6 In favor (Asleson, An-
dersen, Casey, Jessen, Bailey, and Schmidt), and I op-
posed (Weber).
Weber commented that the answer is in the LMCD study.
s4 7
•
MINUTEB OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
February 12, 1990
to dr odq_et Beton Lake. aodlied
V &d Application 9 to install a sand blanket at Phelps
aRRIied by = Goldberg, 4953 Island view Drive.
Mueller commented on Application #90 -6173 stating that he
preferred not to see the island diminished in size as shown on
Exhibit C.
The commission then discussed Application #90 -6192 and the status
of Mr. Goldberg's boathouse which is to be moved off the commons
by Spring 1990. The commission suggested that a bond be posted
to ensure Mr. Goldberg moves his boat house.
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Jensen to recommend
both DNR Applications #90 -6173 and #90 -6192 be approved
with comments acknovledged. Motion carried unanimously.
These applications will be forwarded to the City Council for ap-
proval at their meeting on February 20, 1990.
•
SGS
I r STATE OF RECEIVED JA 2 6 1990
D EPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
METRO REGION WATERS -11.00 WARNER RD., ST. PAUL, M.N. 55106
PHONE NO. 296-7523 FILE NO,
DNR PROTECTED WA PERMIT AP PLICATION NUMBER
REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENTS
DATE: t/ )
TO: U S C.QE -
CE c C<-) FROM: L STRAUSS, AREA HYDROLOGIST
METRO REGION DIVISION OF WATERS
WATERS AFFECTED: "1x- vvl , 4 ' ,, (�2� - 13 3) '�'- 4"'— L,%C-
PROJECT SPONSOR: R 0, e✓ a eck Q(
NATURE OF WORK: Q 1) G 1 o O
C , L , 4
���� L�.,, � � �� 4 � ��--0 � .t-�� L.ti.' • LY' . f' Cl ,i� 1� l JY S •`�'�� J
COMMENTS DUE BY:
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER SL?
"C• PERMIT APPLICATION
cE PA R T M E N T 00 TO W 04K IN PROTECTED WATERS 011 WETLANDS
NATUlAI RESOURCES
► `Please read instructions before attrmntlnn to rmmnlorn rh,c inns —ii. n
o; v USE 'AL y
OSWCD ❑Cr
F1 W D M USCOE
I Apogis Name Last Cl MI I Aulimage -(I Alen! t f,,cc
( Telephone Number a a•Fd
L
IL
Address ISueet RFD Box Nu ber State Itp Cocel -- < < I L
w S 3
I LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (BE `�H
,uGE �n 5r,,_,V,;r�, , ,
vE' T, E ;: T E )
Governm nl Lottsl Duarte( Sectlorns) Section st No Town Iplsi No RangelslNo Lot BloCk Subdivision
W / 4, �}�
_ 1 -� `I
Fire No Box No or Project Address C my c ., ., g..,. �* ' y Cv.a F• 5�
` �.s1 �nFr�. kgLvf, �•�>> ^a„e y
x.:h�•�
�7
1. TYPE OF WORK PROPOSED (C HECK ONE) IV TYPE OF PROJECT (-HECK O^ +E)
excavate L r3 fpc, &r shoreline E shore protection ::1 obstruction oam
J fill remove 5;- channel harbor bridge �. Other
:1 dram
❑abandon
sand blanket permanent dock �., .� culvert (specify)
� construct � other (specify)
0 install - rlprap wharf
ESTIMATED PRO.IECT COST S 2
111. LENGTH OF SHORELINE AFFECTED (IN FEET) 7
VOLUME OF MATERIAL FILLED OR EXCAVATED (IN CUBIC YARDS)
BRIEF EXPLANATION OF PROJECT: (ExrLAIr4 WHAT PROUECT
CONSISTS OF AND H OW WORK WILT. BE DONE
d t•
Q
w , I
FUQ—
/0✓
r1 'If .,,
CA no�s+t/ ` 'CC✓+tc� C e .a +�_�
PURPOSE OF PROJECT: (E cplam thl this protect Is needed)
T 4 c (i i l lic- LL 1
1 . ' 1 •.,, t. e. A�� ;� �cy:c
e.... 5
1C 4 .,•.� v
ENYIRON�IE AI IMPACT (Anticipated changes to the water and related land resources in ding unavoidable but detrimental ettects)
e¢ • • -• l U ii, f ` i •, c e ,
A , c... I _k t 1, • ).c. L �.. Pt .l l , 1 11 1 6 L
ALTER NATIYES (Other alternatives to 'he action proposed) r a, �(, !e 3 0
. 4
I rlereby mart apDl Dwsuant to Mir.nesois statutes Criam�. a. aM ,u ...,....,,...._ ..._ J
I
VI
hh
II
I
I1,
IN.
1 - ..,r. - v a ., a ., , •.,. avvve narrin proleCled
wi elsl in accordance wit" all supoW maps plans ar.d Dthe• , nlormal'u^ subminea *111' a�y�w,,�
COnCernrrp this appl art hyt and CDr 10 the Des' or my knowledge / a 1, A l l I'M and slate *I is maot
SATE Uf // [ / r rG�� 5 'D� l u • 0' Ow�t, Qr Au!MJ lea
v � � J 01
C"TY or 5gnal,, D' .taste DC/�'
SuMr,bed ane sworn Io De'yr mt Inn -- f EGIONON
day Ot /17 rsiCt�cJ
CiKrtSTINE j UEPIM
Y t omm s slor e. p r as NOTARY PaX MINNf M
KNWMI COUNTY
fur or Notary " Enp.es Im )0 )901
Sid
Dale
Da !e
3tlon
White
DNR
Blue
SWCD
Green
Watershed District
Goldenrod
City or County
Pink
Army Corps of Engineers
Canary
Applicant
S ?/
JANI 0 i.1`2 0
REGION VI
WATERS
J
t Z eu
r
n
.J I � 1 L �. � 1 l � ♦ .. �l �. � :4 � � � , I' Y V � f L . n T � • I � ^ \.I ..
AL
^'•••.� J�p..a �+ F ..1 it - � C L.•. -. 1 nCt.�_
J
S ?/
�II
�J
JAhl p 'Pill
vclwq� 41
wa
s7:.
t
S
LL
j
�II
�J
JAhl p 'Pill
vclwq� 41
wa
s7:.
•
S p t
A 1 ,,, ( • y
C J Y X Z x �> 1> > Xt190 y
C • Z+ O t � � a � � '7 z t .c �
r 4v)
T� �-,, l
'l0
�f
A ( a� . �,,�
TO .V. �.►Y. +Y N1 ��fii \ KL �t4 �. b� Y... ``�
i
_ r—
j. ��� �'�...re_
/ I
S73
I
T
c..,r...�_
via
J
l - t �a J • cl ♦ ~ l YC ti t....
C L..,..� 1
CL IL
,(t,
! REGION VI
57 V
�; ..:
w4TER5
r
I �•� •� .lea _ ��'��� ./ -aJ� y• ••
0 6 J 4 19 u• 1 f
s ~� 4 -J � ` ;� �r S im U • t 109e tis
4• 171
N.
19 • 2�, 21 ', 2 2 7 v W a t 10 k\ J - .: t s • Z ' -�
1
Y1y�, Q _ • �f' X11 lj i�
co
NOOORIOGE ROAD ,- ........ w
cr
2 _ / ��• IA i Go ltl js��� i• • rl� �j 1 7� a .• :.• •• � a .' J` -� t j �7
l , I t . , C i
15 ' 14
P A blA
G. \ 1 ���) �° 1� b j v 1 �' i• e A �g �� J�� �• // . �j �, OC J)
g �•; '' p
2 � ` : .1Q 1 " -' s . OE .`' .� � I • • •. ----- -sue'`` ' ,
L r l �.. � :� � �' a te• � ,.• •.. �. _ �' A
S 16
v
1 1 `� �,,� / 1 F�oct of Lo11: 81k
o .l r �/ C p
�i Re•occonQ f alts. A L 1 C R
ap / •��' •.'� _ _mil. --�. l i B 2,5 A,tlrr,rlttll t _
� REGION 1!1
� � � _. .. .
C7
•
•
k
7P 7
4�
-- r. - a
" J
r 11�
at 4o
^'• I FE
O L
Cy'• S • -4 ' ,% O
.• LI
.�ga
f
\ C/
��l •
r
ab.%
. O .
•
I t
572
0
• • e
"OAIJA
IA NOMI
oca o tavr.
T
7 "`lsx—
J."to
w
_5r
L h1
,sl,b
Ex 'Z.:S:�- C.
• 7-3
C t ^ o S. Sr 1 cN•�
C L, ,,
I � ^
hao 1_ :0
.[.OUR VI
v
•
1 -0
. .. - M
IA N019
o
0
0
1
(�zi- -
', cu s
O
Oo
�.M
~ ► •=
11;'1 �
0
0
1
(�zi- -
', cu s
O
Oo
Cx�:U4 f-
�� r
�E
FEt' 'f � 4
V 1 ✓�.� ti
hE t � t.
�rav;p`L
t ` L
t [ C cc 1 A4 .., i : " [ E
a
• 1 �~ �� ~
���N tr, • 1 �e
r
tt.
LG •.
O
� U
VI
,,.•;,,
SS
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 8. 1990
r�
ONR A pp licati on 11190 -6192 for a sand blanket by Mark Goldberg
Park Director. Jim Fackler, reviewed the request and also
reviewed the DNR guidelines for installing a sand blanket.
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Salley, to approve
ONR Application *90 -6192. hotlon carried unanimously.
•
•
Sgt
•
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
Feb.-J %ry 12, 1990
DNR Application 190 -6173 to dredge at 8eton Lake, applied by
Roger Beckel, 4961 Bartlett Blvd.
DNR Application 190 -6192 to install a sand blanket at Phelps Bay,
applied by Mark Goldberg, 4853 Island View Drive,
Mueller commented on Application i90 -6173 stating that he
preferred not to see the island diminished in size as shown on
Exhihit C.
The commission then discussed Application 190 -6192 and the status
of Mr. Goldberg's boathouse which is to be moved off the commons
by Spring 1990. The commission suggested that a bond be posted
to ensure Mr. Goldberg moves his boat house.
• MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Jensen to recommend
both DNR Applications 190 -6173 and 190 -6192 be `pproved
with comments acknowledged. Motion carried unanimously.
These applications will be forwarded to the City Council for ap-
proval at their meeting on February 20, 1990.
•
S83
STATE OF
GFPARTMFNT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PHONE NO METRO REGION WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL. MN 55106FILENO
296 -752' 9
DNR PROTECTED WATERS PERMIT APPLICATION N1'h; ix 'gr - (11 i a
REQUESI FOR REVIEW AND COMMENTS
DATE: 1 /31 /90
TO: L MC.D- fLrfhE sTroo4nFN A h - .SoN PARrER
nCu,'SC) Row ovl�NBf�K
A F M - 80.VCE (; jL8E9TSON
HENNE�:N SwCD- L'oN'[fUr., VSCC(
CtTlf C'r MOV
FROM: CE:; ;;TRAUSS, AREA HYDROLOGIST
w1TERS AFFECTED: LAKE nS ( '2'2 -133 P) PHELPS BAY 00
1
PROJECT SPONSOR: n AR K K. G OL D S EQ G w -
•
NATURE OF WORK '�t ACE A SANG 9L ANKET' A L ON(r 4 0 FEET OF SHoienmc
EXTEUNN(v. 4o r 4 •.r WATERwARD OF THE ORdINARy H rC&H WATER
ELIYATlo11, ANC) S`Y r NCH FS DEEP* AND v31N4r 30 CUAZL YAROr OF
S
COMMENTS DUE BY: .5 O p A y S
s'� y
JOGO
•
< N EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLO' /EP
Rev I. t5 rcAmi1 ArrLWA11u11 z PA
Ir. o f PA R T M t N T Of TO WOMAN PROTECTSO wATE14 OR M1ETIA110=
1�" E AF , —
• IMQYMK s/A sAfETTI
NATURAL RISOUR0S ❑"M ❑C:C
so Do Please read Instructions before anemptfng to complete this application 0w 0 ❑1J9 m
%Address ani s Name (Last. First M I I Author zed Agent (of applicable) Telephone Numblrta oe
C2 I L IX 30
�eaco
1 trees. RFD B oy Number. City State Zip Code)
1 << Z6 'J
ATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (BE SuPE iNCLuDE '- ►t SHOwiN6 TOGET TO THE SITE)
Government Lot(s) Quarter Sectiorw Secaonisi No Townst•,Ipisi No Range(s)No Lot. Block. Subdivision
/N 26 1 //7 I LS T y Pc - c c l y 0 r
Fire No Box No or Project Address County 9 use t' rreuanc Y Watt -
game t •k,To••
F nNf �/V f .now I/4A
III. TYPE OF WORK PROPOSED (CHECK ONE) TV. TYPE OF PROJECT (CHECK ONE)
C excavate p repaor sh of el:ne C shore - protection ❑ obstruction 0 dam
31111 C remove C channel 3 harbor 3 bridge O other
0 drain C abandon JL sand blanket C permarent dock O culvert (swity)
O Construct O other Ispeclty)
0 install Z r'prap C wharf
V. Ef WTE9 PROJECT W $7 h. LENGTH OF SHORELINE AFFECTED (IN FEET) y0
V1. VOLUME OF MATERIAL FILLED OR EXCAVATED (IN CUBIC YARDS) -3 0
M. BRIEF EXPLANATION OF PROJECT: (EXPLAIN WHAT PROJECT CONSISTS OF AND HOW WORK WILL BE DONE
AA- 9(.,NINK16 T piv c X `c:s Fy ncN. � y'2 r � 6 //y R y
T,QucK 0L,FFA lCc .
If. PURPOSE OF PROJECT: (Explain . !ty Clls project Is needed)
Fob /:i���Airc�.ic►t. c rS�,
SLl, rt �S Sciti�S�TA c 4- L_ /_4.. (At 0. � Il y
1 E)MMNNIENTAL IMPACT (Anticipated changes to the water and related land resources. Including unavoidable but detrimental effects)
D. I ALTERNATKI (Other alternatives to the action proposed)
in. I hreov make aptfiicat.on owsuant Io Men nesofa St atut es Ch apte , 105 a2 and all supprrtuq rules lee a 1114FmA to work M Or Matt flee above nalhad pr*WW
wal rn accor(arlce wt? all s.,pWing maps Plans and otter niolmallon suDrmifed with this lWiCatgn The rrllortratrorl suAnu 6d and Mail 01ea Title
concerning this applrcai-on are true and correct to the Hest of m knowle*
S,gnjf of Ownr Or Au" sled ()ate
/V� / 1 /N � 1 v 'a !,/
Statf OF
COUNTY Or ,e/ j ,v . F P Signature of luS o
SLAwsbed and sworn to Wort me fts _ —
da or _ ' ' 'q Distribution
White ONR
'-'-'-�- - - Blw: SWCD
w rdmmnssan exprlia 1 c G(Nn Watershed DISVICII
Goidervod City Or County
signat a ary Pick: Army Corps of Engineers
Canary Applicant ,S cIr
tIti X11$0 °A
f& "INA& 0/1<oukc111{
LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT COMMENTS
rM1 fro so camper" oy a ppricanr►
we of +cant
M A k r Gof.oarALG
VIwa MAS
PRUMUT LMATMN X S 1 /-17
Olen will affect: (Mme of lake, wedan , or watercourse)
-. A t 1W v - 104 K A
I hereby submit this application for permit to. Signalure1) Apps ant ,. Date
(mark proper box) Ids/
❑appropriate water ® work in prOtK*d waters I X ./2 i /fo
i )
The following local unit of government comments and /or recommendations are submitted for consideraMoft by five
Department of Natural Resourm In Me dlapoe Mort of the referenced permit applleaMOn. (%W- T of
M&MITTED M THE DNA WITHIN 30 DAYS Wrier AWoprledon Permit Applk:OW4 an N W Pail
I T
AppMeadom are to be sent to to OW Rpsortal Office. SEE AEVEASE SIDE f M COMEDY MAIL ADOAESSE�
•
Was the proposed project field sispected by this local unit of government?
❑NO ❑YES (if Yes. give viewer's nam)
I I I I
Authoeized Signature Title Date Telephone No (Area Codtl
Name of responding Sall and WSW Conservation District. Watershed District, City or County
Address (of tit above named local unit of government)
519(a (DNA — Division of Water addressee on back)
CITY COUNCIL PACKET 2/20/90 #2
(0%
•
1!
0 0.
•
.r 1 .�
ISLAND VIEW DR.
r8
-- a000 -
_oo ,,•IT
14 �� 70 •I
�I
0 �I
UN UE,2
DEMO L
I s7c�r �
-
S7UCW
HOU S!
I I
1
a L EASEM i.N T
Q •'� I 0 P_ .at D oc ,
778237
- m
M M
AA ^^ M
r '• r. I
0
H 1 0 I
OEVOKJ_ _ ' COMmo
RIP RAP
I
LAKE ,MINNETONKQ
40'
x BE
0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENTS
I .•, .. -) • - - 'D
We hereby certify that this Is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of:
Lot 4, Block 14, DEVON, Hennepin County.
And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said
land. As surveyed by me or under my direct supervision this 12th day of May 1 �
MCCopibs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. '
By: �2�
PAUL A. JO
Land Surveyor, Minn. LIc. No. 10938
McCombs Frank FioceAsaocistee ,Inc. "I z-10' CERTIFICATE OF SURVE
7 • for
,S05022rdAve N Enpinsern 3> 79
5 Plymouth, 5544I DynnM MARK GOLDBERG
e,ar47e•e o,o surv•yon 5315
•
q SS.3 ISLnN vicw bK
J, \JUND M SSJ&y
WHEL 9A✓
Notch S lAoLE
E
Al S
w
r,.., r,, •.o..1f
C. E T t - Aw/V
C
RAP 3 Fr
I
AVE FLAC t wAttQ LEvQL
1 L x Poti[ K F •�►� v F
U O F 1 VJ aT E P, Cu RtiC��YI Y
HENNEPIN CO. MINN.,
•' � cScd�C /� � /SO=
r �• • r , � — 'mod —� / - - - - - - - �
� ' • - �•_.,. � ° '..•.•.,.,...... , .r +.. Rood -
: i
''�•— f - o
Q.
I � + + M ,• Nono✓er• n
. - .: �.i- - � mac: r � - . - :s .= 1 r - r - « — '? - :: r - r« r. � ��j' « s ... .. •` .. « 7. 1 f ,
`� ;. � � p. r•, :• Iii l '•,. �.. , . •• • is � ;• 'r ` •'
ifdJ Or u � f /IC Iw I ; ^j r s � i : �• ;• I � 4
pn
_; �.:. �,x• :1 gar Dev
_ L
co
Le Ire
J •
r � J
0 0
✓. E Eyrsn, c'-
r
`�. .
, r • ` RRR /// JJ //
cO I 0/r
x i n ne tonka.
X « «.... • // ...... L rA-. ......c, rrr T . •y 1.
(Il /�►a.r Lr .... /•/ �. i..w:••
M.r,•...I fj.f T.• �/ :.. ir.'a /s. /....rw"d;f'^ psr/
.y�•�•i !•vf •:w Tr.•7�J +�Nf/ /i.A.rf li�Ir>A •�..
j.f J'r.�i // /A.w••.K►fJ y irL I• ✓/ /i. yw.Ia
im. .rwr Y• !. rr..•• art r✓iffVi w 'Aare"* ..
...s rw.w.... w .1.aw •w. t�ww•a �./ . /� •
Howard R. Tripp
Regional Director
American Scholarship Foundation
Box 1 -16
Hanover, MN S531
RFr` FEB 1 '��
February 9, 19911
11r. Edward Sheckel
Cite of Mound
5311 Maywoo] Road
`-found, MN 55364
Pear 'qtr. Sheckel ,
I respectfully request a renewal use permit to hold the weigh-in
for our bass fishing tournament at Mound Bay Park on .Tune 10.
1990, beginning at approx. 3:00pm.
We would like to begin setting up our weigh -in equipment at
12:00 noon and should he completed with the weigh -in and tear
down by 6:00pm. We will make ever effort to make sure that the
heath and park area are clean and litter -free when we leave the
area. You can also he assured that we will do our hest to
accommodate other users of the park and we will always keep
safety as our number one consideration.
I have :applied for the needed permits from the TAR, LMCI1,
Sheriff's Water Patrol and Hennepin County Parl:s, and these
should he forthcoming.
Please find enclosed a copy of our tournament rules for your
further information.
Please feel free to contact me at .1'.aS -8(r9S or my wife .Julie at
420 -6100 if we can provide you with any additional inf- rmation
concerning, this permit.
Sincerely,
IInwa rd R . Tripp
Nc iornaI Itiirector
�.ICrlC"III Follrl�ljt iron
1 ncl') -;>>re A', <t :it(d
,571/
RULES AND REGMTIONS: Rules and Regulations are included
bmiN with 8l1Io Robtions. You will to expected to be familiar
with all items BEFORE entering. NOTE: Rule additions and
ndaials haw been made.
1. SAFETY: Safe but" conduct must be observed at ill limes by all luamamenl
Wipe MXS. Each competitor is requited 10 wear a Coast Guard a,rproveo chest
type We preserver The preserver must be silapped snapped of nppered se;mely
UM MamtaNMd in that Condition unit trio Combustion engine Is shut off This
ge3ervef must be wOm any time the Combustion engine is operating Violation of
Ihfs rule shall be reason lot OhSqua nt"lion
2. SPORTSMANSW. Competitors in our tournaments are expected to follow n,yh
standards of sWsminshmp courtesy Safety aid LUnstivahon Any inhactgn of
these fundalMntal Sporting principles may be deemed Gus, lot disquall"hun
Drunhlness by a competitot during the lournimenf or tournament functions wdi no!
be WWated and shall Of Cause for JUfOmabc o15(tWidlCal.on lot this and at. future
Idurnamenis Maximum Courtesy must be practiced at all times especially wllh
regard to Dutalq and angling in the vilify of non competitors who may be on
tournament waters Any act of a competitor which reflects unfavorably upon the
Foundations toot to promote fisheries conse(valuan clean waters . and courtesy
may also be reason lot discluahhGbun No alcoholic beverages or other 5hmuanls
or depressants ploscrmplion or otherwise shall be allowed m the boats of at the
weigh-in
7. TACKLE AND EOUNMAENT Only arld,c41 lures may be used No live bail or
'Plepaled bad will Of permitted with In# excephun Of pork strips ands etc Only
ONE eaSlirtg Of $Pinning lud (8 loo! maximum length fi0m outt of handle t0 moo lip)
And meet III be used at any One Line All other types prohibited Other rigs as
specified above may be in brat ready for use nuwever only ONE is perrntted of use
at any given firm All bass must be caught live and ,ri a conventional sporting
manner
A. HORSEPOWER REGULATIONS Your boat and motor must conlonn to B 1 A
Horsepower Ratings Simply your engines horsepower is not to ex teed the
hOrsepOwor limitations iet by the U S Coast Guard horsepower fall to plate
attached to the but by the manufacturer The horsepower of file outboard engine
must NOT exceed the rating specified on this rating plate Any boil maoufacluned
prior W November T 1912 must adhere to the ratings set by Ire U S Coast Guard
lot similar boats. Each competitor agrees to submit . by h,5 signature on this
dMU( Mnl, the 001 and outboard motor used in l: - ,e tournament loan inspection by
fac" Ironed personnel of there is any reason to suspect the horsepower is in
excess of the rating Normal maintenance to increase the performance of your
engine is al'awed Changing of altering standard factory parts of your motor to
InCr4sm do horsepower over Ine factory horsepower rating is forbidden and will
nesuR N d'sgWlrlrcation from 'his tournament
S COAT AND MOTOR: ALL BOATS FAUST BE EQUIPPED WITH EITHER A SEAT
PRESSURED OR LANYARD TYPE IGNITION KILL SWITCH Fishing boats may be
used that are 14 feet or more in length A small motor gas or electric . may be use]
for slow naneavenng Lolling as a method of fishing is prohibited No 'barges or
Similar CurnfMf$ a Craft will DC permitted It having been deletmrned that boats
equipped with 'STICK STEERING' PRESENT GREATER THAN NORMAL SAFETY
HAZARDS. NO BOAT SO EQUIPPED SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE USED DURING
TOURNAMENT HOURS BY ANY COMPETITOR Tit! defmdhon of 'Stick steering'
shaft be made by the Tournament Committee The competitor may use his own
Dual MW motile of d is allowed under these rules or rent a boat and motor M the
lour amen) Soft such possible renal being the sole respOnsibdmty of the compytdon
a .&ASH: BOAT EGUIPMENT: Every boat must have all required Coast Guar) safety
equipment In addition. it must have a functional bilge pump and LIVE-WELL
SPACE. PROPERLY AERATED TO ADEOUATELY MAINTAIN ALIVE A LIMIT CATCH
OF BASS BY BOTH FISHERMEN USING THE BOAT Tournament officals shill have
the Will responsderly for determining whether aeration and capacity is "proper and
ad""@'
7. PERMITTED FISHING LOCATIONS: Fishing on the tournament waters is
pe frlkAled arlywnere excepl within 50 yards of any nanri gas pump Or within 50
yard$ Of 611011Mr COII PUIO('S boat which was first anchored A boil IS Considered
alOWOd oNy A A le tied 10 an obsect of has an anchor line over IIS Sde with trolling
MOIW Out Of water. NO 31rCIl enthoed boil Shat permit Selected competitors to fish
wdhm art 50 yard circle Clalmod by him to the exclusion of any other Competitor. All
ang" mutt to done Iron the Doll. Competitors wishing to cftL.ge fish habitat by
pLic" any OWJ n the tournament waters may d0 so if such action does not
AOW SUN or lederal regoleldns Contestants must not depart boil to land fish
OW muff rerllen in tournament waters during tournament day Contestants must
Nave art return W Official Checkpoint by but Both Competitors must remain in
COMaCI with boat at all Mmes except in or ., 01 Core ethef2ency In Such in
errlerOMY. A C'O WAW mays be removed .tom his boat to A Dot operated by
other cumpeldors Ol a rescue Dual so d be tournament u:hL ,JIS II a
competitor must v any of the above conOd,OaS due to an emergency on ally
olhel reason his Catch Of that day shall not be counted u1 the IoulnifnMl unies5
Ihe Ioufamtm Official can clearly determine that Said competitors Opelaleo wdh n
the staled tmengency guidelines LJdenng of boats oulwo tountaniarl huu•s Is
prohibited except by tOUra(Tltnl OfilLIAIS
/. OFFICIAL CHECK POINT: There shun be only one unival point lot cheicl our n,
the morning and check in in the allemoctt and Ns V0u11 shall be designalet Al 1I+e
tournament bntlnng At the lime ill check out all compefiti)ns and their boll, snail
be ,n lull conformance with all rules set Loren by Iuurnamenl colrntttee at (t12ii ,n
all boats shall identity themselves by contacting the LheCk In boil and proceed
hmmedhalety Io the designated weigh in area
9 SCORING'. 'PSAKILAtm011 POifIIS' at a late Of 5 points per evert will be awl led lu
each original team No points in any cafegdty may be shamed or split ender any
circumVionceS Tournament standings auxiliary awards and foal winners seen be
determined by the pound and POUlrJ "Actions Of each conmpelllor S Catch during file
day 01 the tournament Only Largemouth Spelled ur Sn bass wIII fir
weighed The limit shall be 10 per learn At no lime she: a cornpetdur have nedu, ed
1 0 possession In his of her live well mole that, file 1,110, described Abu. '
Tournament officials will conduct checks for vioal,un uI Ih,s pl9vlsitn end ,n the
Weill a Competitor has more (hail the above 4escr hinds m pia Sse•ssl SliAll
cull the largest bass first down to the held described 141 oil,! 4i length 4u Uav l
snail lit 12 inches unless the state honor is over 17 Inches ill wh icl I - ase Inn slalr
bind will Coeval Only BASS as desn ibu.e Mtchi it resuir 11 flLhifs of + •r ,n
lenglh on the longest slrarght line *.Ill mouth Llosed silo be wr gned ,n HJ41
presented lot weigh in which fail In TIPJsu 1 2 itches shall a.cvue penan,es al t,I'e ,
rate of one pound lot each Such oa`,s Also any bus trial falls outside ill I i
guidelines of J given body of water s slot hm,t *, l ie bete
lure pound Ion eacfi bass JLl o:dmyty this penally snail be deduUed " u , !',e
score of the Competitor Any bass trial appears W ha.e beer 'ae .
mauled of otherwise altered will be weighed and Ifedne,l unit' it It des. , • 1 e _A
!ournamntnt officials Bass thus? nol be sirnige,t0 At any l i e d " :'y I! r
tournament II has been determined vial strnhge ilrcreasrs rile r
bass survival and bass thus handled nay be msounbhrd Spe(,eu, des e'er I: Ali which itch ease the sWVwal male will be !urnlShed by Inn fuurr:amenl Co(lIFT", e' 7
these bags must !)e used tot weigh ni Place of I,o,sh ,,tI „w% ore ,, tell !
place
10. DON'T KILL YOUR CATCH fich I npeldor is e to keep nIn oar's a i e
by use of a pfopto aerated live well the few bass wtl„h du :,ill s „r.�., w i r
used for scientific study ono (dlanty
11. PENALTY POINTS. for each legal bass weighed i, dead Tie u r I el 1 .. !,a I ,
peahted three tenths of a pound on then total weigh) This w d : I apps ;o I , g
Bass' weights and awards A l:dmpel 101 may also take a ! unker a t file .1 ',I le, ,
of the tournamenl olhcul tom a Inil•h; wdl be pr'Iarh;eJ The rJUr nJ n,r
dmeclor and his designated appo Shan have sole aurr+u•g,, lw a;srss'�,y
penalties
12 LATE PENALTY'. Compttltors who are not in tae unival check -pond area aS
described previously at the appointed lane shall b ptal at the tale of 1 pound
per mthule 10 be deducted front the total weight 01 his inch that day including J:
weight 10 be Counted toward a 'lunker award ' . for each one I I t minute he IS 'a!e
Any comptldnr more than 15 minutes late shall lose all credit 10r ITai day s UKh
T here Shall be no excuse lot tardiness and in no case salt a (.collpehlor be allowed
10 make up lost lime After proper recognition at the check ;. ,,rd competo w 11
be allowed ample I.me to proceed to the weigh to sole huv., .e all hst,I mull
Cease upon Check-m After tournamment begins li0ing is pruh,bded except d„nng
tournament tours Any tam not checked out p open/ by hie crieck cut hWt shall
be d'SOuahtied from parllClpalkon
17. TIES: In case of a tie lot first pace . there will be a sudden death I,sli off
between the tied Contestants, under the direction and special rue$ as may be
t3a011Shed by the tournament officals Ties for tosser positions Shall be rts0lved
by means selected by tournament officals
fA. RULINGS: The tournament director and his designated appointees Stull reserve
All rights for rule Interpretation and rulings thereof funhermo(e the louiamenl
committee reserves the right t0 change the dale of Or file Sole 01 any glyen
Scholarship tournament Protests must be Submitted on writing within 15 minutes of
final WI to wilin
15 . PAIRINGS: This is a'fish with your buddy' tournament
N. PARTICIPANTS: Participants must be a member of our Schuaghlp lounimr tit
Program Women are welCO 12 pamKipansl Participants must be al least 16 years
of age
17 ENTRY Please note u:rl , nvddllui , a s ,o re .+ r•n:. ;. .:Itabur's kSr »
Unly honor those entire” trial air "s! Ir'r .eta ,I !r a - +d I,,,1 •,i 1 V f. ..
rnusl be a member Ill gu0d star d l o g w t A t.e••ia [ a'.! e' r
P(Ugram to (1441 All unto , ;j e' 1 ., A l i , A, a:y
nmrn belship al one same Ln,e rkw I11alr r. u !ea u'' inr• C "' t ..
I and lu musv be rear�,ed L e ,:JirC �ea'
SpeGHC tou . o I to , :IC i ude!1 1 tr 'e�:1,. pre •Pia sl'a'. •, r , ew
lake u!I pc;'bur, Ili 't Ar,e:. r... I •, a'. e .
apistrahcri into earn g,.r i:aa:•.
slJird per -hey r.tra:,ur� d «ad ,• ',te
dradime f nines Irl t - re^ a. :• +r Ar.r ., a' .. - ... ., ,
- Ieylsl'enon dPJ dhnC »i! '.E a el'IC! e: ,e. r
IAIr mCg sli Ai , , , I , S w f r dS• .rr .
ieg stqut:)re e w.,. . , I r n .e • :axe
Vote registered conlrfa ",I: 'r.rlr ». •e a 52000
` !ICUSes to leyrslel lair'
nay be refunded an.!nrrr I,rt.:.rP • , , . ^d "'e J'. :air r.(• n ,.
wJl !tarsler our ere:. 1, e• - r
notice rs gl.e: , r'e w , S5 00 .. - .. n
surcta'It 'a' d yet,. • it, .•r A' , e &,;tied 01 bolh
cl it'll
18 RfGISTRA110N tort I . ..
l,resef� to hey,• -I" se-
�' r•, is , pus ,:e t e .11
fev "IPred b, a rme rl Vi 31 1" .. _
a! the I,me J1.0 ;,,a, a I "" ,. r.r::.. ,r s.',..
EXCEPTIONS I
1 sc„SSfd owhr
'�d Ul ;i, p CrIn1S .• _ ..
19 PRE TOURNAMENI PRACT1Cf
.I•euai tr t _ eS _ ...
da, Wn,le VI I:,P :nxr J ... -
ayency employee v ter , ;a 1rr .
1.
Icul•1Am(nl .
20 SUBSTITUTION ; a'r • .
� •,r I, ,
' I•e eiq'v l '. ; an 'r a : cr:
' ;Ine rnPnl prUgm cal ^ Su L air '. dwe��: -
SuOsidule *oil 'H.e'vP
5111ule is nul , doer.!,!
as a new aria Separate !ee'+I a - " s. to e. e
LilultWACll:7x YL'am!iL.
21 POSUSEASON COMPFTITION
SEASON events a:e rwr,i. • ,
m
Iuurnamenl (on r n: e•i, tram A V.r ... .
post season event n'us! d': ' a.P
same respective Division ,n "'.1" !c d''to :,. al,! •, r, I.r• At
will not be invited to past season a;,c .I '. ., ,, ._ 'heel '• ..
roqunemnenl
22 REGIONAL AND CLASSIC RULES u H� «. a•,d i:r.
admmhSltred_at the - Ameruan 1,-a.• key , ass r. !tie • A " :r » 'rr r
Championship Fisn Ca5Si1 Al;
rules n III
EACH COMPETITOR AGREES TO u:illl Or HIS OR HER SIGNATURE ON
THIS DOCUMENT FO A TRUTH VERIFICATION TEST SHOULD HE OR SHE
BE ACCUSED OF ANY RULE VIOLATION THE FIRST PLACE TEAM BIG
BASS, ANO A TEAM WHICH WrLL BE RANOOMLT DRAWN FROM THE TOP
TEM FINISHERS, WILL BE AUTOMATICAII r GIVEN rrr/S TEST FOLLOWING
THE WEIGH IN
�I
ti
•
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
Twin Cities St Cc C 15050 23rc Ave N Telephone
Plymouth MN 612 476 -6010
55447 Facs"nde
612 476 -8532
February 15, 1990
Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
City of Mound
7341 Maywood Road
!round, Minnesota 5536
SUBJECT: City of Mound, Minnesota
1990 Maintenance Dredging
City Property
MFRA #7090
Dear Ed:
Eng nee
Planners
Surveyors
Enclosed is Minnetonka P ortable Dredging, inc. 's Payment Request No. 1, for-
work completed through Februa: 17, V'OF', for the subject project. The amount
of this payment request is S 2 7 . -' •00.
We have reviewed this request, find that it is in crder, and recommend
payment to the Con: tractor in the 3 oust of 52;,225.00.
Us.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Very truly yu".: s.
Fi.. ' *K RUUS ASSOCIATFS, ItiC.
J(;hn Cameron
•
JC: jmj
En s_• , 0.s;"; 5
SQ3
"1
PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 1
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
1990 Maintenace Dredging
City Property
MFRA #7090
rn�jTRarrm ENGINEER
Minnetonka Portahle Dredging McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
`)00 west Lake Street 15050 23rd Avenue North
excelsior, Minnesota 55331 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
CONTRACT UNIT QUANTITY
ITEM QUANTITY PRICE USED TOTAL
1 . Area A L.S. L.S. 100% $ 23,100.00
2. Area B L.S. L.S. 100% 7,150.00
3. Area C L.S. L.S. 0% 0.00
Original Contract $ 34
Work Completed Through 2 -IS 30,250.00
Less Retainage (10%) 3,025.00
Amount of Payment Request $ '27,725.uu
I hereby certify that this estimate
is true and correct.
Approved and recommended for payment
in the amount of $ 27
MINNETONKA PORTAALE DREDGING CO.
By:
Date:
McCOMBS FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC.
By: � �— �I -007 .tL--
J'
Date:
CITY MOUND, MI SOTA
Date /
• For February 20, 1990
February 15, 1990
LICENSE RENEWAL -- Expire 2- 28 -90. New License Per * 3 -1 -90 to 2- 28 -91.
Approval contingent upon all required forms, insurance
etc. being turned in.
Garbage Disposal
Blackowiak b Son
Randy's Sanitation
Westonka Sanitation
Woodlake Sanitary
C igarette
Al b Alma's Supper Club
Ben Franklin
Bob's Bait Shop
Brickley's Market
Mack's Jock Club
Meyer's Peoples Plus Service Station
Mound Municipal Liquor (Joe's Vending)
PDQ Food Store 110292
SuperAmerica 14194
Thrifty Snyder Drug 11704
VFW 115113 (Joe's Vending)
Westonka Foods
GAMBLING 1_ICENSF -- Resubmitting; - New License Peri()d: 4 -01 -90 to 3 -31 -91
Clasti A
M' Raffles, Pad(Ilewheels, Tipboards, Pull -Tabs)
American Legion Post x
2133 Wilshire Blvd.
?hound, "iinn. 5516'#
•
Sir
/ }
�J
� ,.
' y �
�\
<' �
,1 '
BILLS - - - - - -- FEBRUARY 20, 1990
•
BATCH 0021
BATCH 0022
47,490.30
133,596.36
TOTAL BILLS 181,086.66
•
PAGE I
PURCHASE JOURNAL
MT!
1114/98
AP- CO2-01
CITY OF MM
TIME
0.0.15
VENIXR
INVOICE OtE HOLD
PRE -PAID
OEM
NO. INVOICE NO DATE DATE STATUS
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT WW
WINIT
OEM 0
DATE
80571
PRE -PAID
249.99
TV i VCR
73- 7300-5000
0
249.99
TV i VCR
78- 7800 -y090
59.99
CALCULATOR
73- 7300 -2100
2/14/90 2/14/90
559.97
JK -CD
1010
559.97
30220
2/02/90
BEST BUT COMPANY
YETOI]Ft TOTAL
559.97
80577
PREPAID
4,577.65
JUN RECYCLE SERV
01 -4270 -4200
2/14190 2/14/90
4,577.65
JMNL -CD
1010
4577.65
30252
2/13/90
WI RECYCLING SYSTEMS OF A YOM TOTAL
4577.65
00888
PRE -PAID
3,454.00
CR UNION 2/3 PR
01-2040 -0000
2/14/90 2/14,
3,454.00
J81-0
1010
3454.00
30230
2/00/90
CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION YEW TOTAL
3454.00
00910
PREPAID
62.%
REPLEN P/C-- RESERVES
01-2300 -0220
2/14/90 2/14/90
62.96
,AIL-CD
1010
62.%
30720
2/09/90
PREPAID
25.77
REPLEN P/C--POLICE
01- 4140-2200
2114/90 2114/90
25.77
JML-CD
1010
25.77
30229
2/09/90
CITY CF MONK)
VENDOR TOTAL
88.73
CI001
PRE -PAID
2,376.49
SIT 1/3 PR
01- 2040-0000
2/14M 2/14/90
2,376.49
J NL-CD
1010
2376.49
30231
2/08/90
COMMISSIONER OF W43 ME VENDOR TOTAL
2376.49
01235
PRE -PAID
1,301.40
FEB DENTAL
01-2040 -0000
16.20
FEB DENTAL- RETIREES
01-4190-1510
41.60
FEB DWAL- RETIREES
01-42OD-1510
41.60
FEB DENTAL- RETIREES
01- 4140 -1510
57.80
FEB DENTAL-RETIREES
71- 7170 -1510
2/14/90 2/14/90
1,458.60
J ML-CD
1010
1458.60
30M
2/06/90
DELTA DENTAL
VIM TOTAL
1458.60
E1429
PRE -PAID
1,584.54
L!Q
71-7100-9510
121.00
NINE
71-7100-9520
33.17-
DISC
71-710D-9560
2/14/90 2/14/90
1,672.37
JNMI -CD
1010
1672.37
30224
2/07/90
PREPAID
751.63
LTG
71-7100 -9510
15.03-
DISC
71 7100-
2/14'90 2/14/90
736.60
JO L -Cxl
1010
736.60
302%
2/14/90
ED PHILLIPS 6 SONS
VENDOR TOTAL
2408.97
G1955
PRE -PAID
1,328.00
DEF COP 2/3 PR
01- 2040-OOM
2/14/90 2!14/90
1,328.00
Jill -CD
1010
1328.00
30235
2/08190
GREAT WEST LIPS ASSlF*G VENDOR TOTAL
1328.00
GIQ'1
PRE -PAID
21.80
GRP HLTH 2/3 PR
O1- 2040 -0000
i 2 0 - 3 a
7
5U
S17
PAGE 2
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE
2/14/90
AP- CO2 -01
CI IT OF NUM
TIME
8.46.15
YE?OIYt .
INVOICE DUE W
PREPAID
CIM
NO. INVOICE Me
DATE DATE STATUS
MM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT MW
AMM
CHECK 4
DATE
2/14/90 2/14190
21.80
JtK -CD
1010
21.80
30241
2/08/90
OROUP HEALTH PLAN
VENDIDR TOTAL
21.80
G1972
PREPAID
119.64
MINE
71- 7100 -9520
4.64-
D19C
71 -7100 -9560
4.41
FRT
71- 7100-9600
2/14/90 .2/14/90
219.41
JRK -CD
1010
219.41
30222
2/07190
PRE-PATD
584.48
LIQ
71-7100 -9510
143.52
MINE
11-7100-9520
14.56-
DISC
71- 7100-9560
4.73
FRT
71-7100-9600
2/14/90 2/14/90
718.17
JK-M
1010
718.17
30247
2/13/90
GRIOGS COOPER i COMPANY VO4D011 TOTAL
937.58
H2145
PREPAID
288.46
OED 2/3 PR
0:- 2040-0000
1/14190 2/14190
188.46
5NL -CD
1010
288.46
30237
2/06/90
FEIN CO STPPOFIT i M.LECT+ VFI4DOR TOTAL
288.46
I23DI
PRE -PAID
512.90
ICMA 457 - -2/3 PR
01-2040 -0000
2/14/90 2/14/90
512.90
J K-CD
1010
512.90
30234
2/08/90
ICMA RETIREFET4T TRUST -457 VE1M TOTAL
512.90
12304
PRE -PAID
2/14/90 2/14/90
91.98
91.98
ICMA 401 - -2/3 PR
JNL-CD
01- 2040-0000
1010
91.96
30233
2/08/90
ICMA RETIRE M TRUST -401 YOM TOTAL
91.98
12390
PRE -PAID
170.00
FDIC CONF-PEDERSON
22- 4170 -4110
2/14/90 2/14,190
170.00
J NL-CD
1010
170.00
30250
2/13/90
ISFSI -FDIC REGISTRAR VENDOR TOTAL
170.00
J25M
PREPAID
691.90
DEC PIA 1NSP
01- 2040 -0000
2/14/90 2114/90
691.90
JiK -CD
1010
691.90
30246
2/13/90
JOHN BE I TNB
VENDOR TOTAL
691.90
J2571
PRE -PAID
266.50
41 CONTRACT MOMS
01 -4340 -3100
2/14/90 2/14/90
166.50
JiK-CD
1010
266.50
30226
2/07/90
JOHN TAFFE
VENM TOTAL
266.50
JM79
PRE -PAID
1,446.58
LIQ
71- 7100 -9510
356.95
MINE
71 -7100 -9520
32.51-
DISC
71-7100-9560
2/14/90 2/14/90
1,771.02
At -CD
1010
1171.02
30223
2/07/90
PRE -PAID
1,397.74
LIQ
71- 7100-9510
1,096.06
MINE
71-7100 -9520
39.08-
DISC
71-7100-9560
2/14 r40 ;/
2,454.72
JRNL - CD
1010
1454.72
30248
2/13/90
S17
PAC 3
PURCHASE JOURNAL
AP-0O2 -01
1.48.15
CITY OF ROUND
VENDOR INVOICE OLE HMO
ACCOUNT NUMBER NQXT CHECK 0
DATE
NO. INVOICE NIMIRi DATE DA*E STATUS
NOW
DESCRIPTION
PRE -PAID
44.25
WINE
.44-
DISC
2/14/90 2/14/90
43.81
J K-CD
JOINOH BROS WHOL LI• VENDOR TOTAL
4269.55
J2600 PREPAID
14.83
REIMB NELSON -MINI BLIND
2/14/90 2/14/90
14.83
JRNL-CD
JOYCE NELSON VENDOR TOTAL
14.83
L2770 PRE -PAID
20.00
SY THE LAKE BANRIIET- .ENSD1
20.00
SV THE LAME WaU -.EN N
2/14/90 2/14/90
40.00
JRNL-CD
LAME CONSERVATION 010 YEI�R TOTAL
40.00
1281 PREPAID
44.00
UNION 2/3 PR
2/14/90 2114/90
44.00
AL-0
LAIN E FORLE ENT LABOR SER; YOM TOTAL
44.00
N3051 PRE -PAID
10,584.26
FIT 2/3 PR
2/14190 2/14/90
10,584.26
AL-CD
N1fN ETTE 1ANC - ROUND YOM TOTAL
10584.26
N3090 PRE -PAID
97.84
RED C 2/3 PR
2/14/90 2/14/90
97.84
aL-CD
MED MM HEALTH PLAN YOM TOTAL
97.84
NMI PREPAID
286.00
Off COIF 2/3 PR
2/14/90 2/14,
288.00
AL-CD
MN RETIREMENT SYSTEM VENDOR TOTAL
286.00
N3435 PREPAID
621.65
UNION 1/3 PR
2/14/90 2114/90
621.65
JRNL-CD
MN TEANSTERS LOCAL 320 VENDOR TOTAL
621.65
P3950 PREPAID
6,422.26
PERA 213 PR
2/14/90 2/14/90
6,422.28
JRNL-CD
P E R A VENDOR TOTAL
6422.28
P4030 PRE -PAID
516.58
PHP 21 PR
2/14/90 2/14/90
516.58
JRRL-CD
PHYSICIANS OF MN VENDOR TOTAL
516.58
04171 PREPAID
1,756.84
LID
168.35
WINE
37.05-
019C
sit
DATE
2/14/90
TIME
1.48.15
PRE -PAID
ow
ACCOUNT NUMBER NQXT CHECK 0
DATE
71- 7100-9560
71- 7100-9520
71-7100-9560
1010 43.81 30295
2/14/90
73- 7300 -2100
1010 14.83 3D251 2/13/90
01-1190-0000
01-4020 -4120
1010 40.,E 30221 2/02/90
01-2040-0000
1010 44.00 30244 2/08/90
01- 2040-0000
1010 10584.26 30230 2/01/90 °
01-2040-0000
1010 97.84 30242 2
v
01- 2040-M
1010 288.00 30236 2/000
01- 2040-0000
1010 621.65 30243 2/06/90
It
01-2040-0000
1010 6422.28 30232 2/08/90
01- 2040-0000
1010
516.56 30240 2/06/90
71- 7100 -9510
71-7100-9520
71- 7100-9560
r
C)bl /
•
sil
PAGE 4
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE
2/14/90
W -01
CITY OF ROUND
ME
8.48.15
VENDOR INVOICE ME HOLD
PRE -PAID
DECK
NO. INVOICE NRBR DATE DATE STATUS
MW
DESCRIPTI0N
ACCOUNT MUM
AIQ/Q
OW 0
DATE
16.95
NIX
71-1100-9540
2/14/90 2/14/90
1,907.09
JRII-CD
1010
1907.09
30225
2/07/90
PRE -PAID
2,467.38
LID
71-7100-9510
334.10
MINE
71- 7100-9520
52.71-
DISC
71- 7100-9560
2/14/90 2/14/90
2,748.77
AL-CO
1010
2748.77
30249
2/13/90
DUALITY MINE i SPIRITS VENDOR TOTAL
4695.86
54511 PRE -PAID
508.92
CR UNION 2/3 PR
01- 2040-0000
2/14/90 2/14/90
508.92
,All -ID
1010
508.92
30239
2/08190
STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNION YOM TOTAL
508.92
115110 PRE -PAID
100.00
REGISTR -WMA CONE -CLAW(
01-4040-4110
2/14/90 2/14/90
100.00
JR1L-CD
1010
100.00
30233
2/13/90
UNIVERSITY OF MM VENDOR TOTAL
100.00
115520 PRE -PAID
50.00
TAX DEBATE RTG
01- 4040-4120
25.00
TAX DEBATE 96
O1- 4140-4120
2/14/90 2/14/90
75.00
J K-CD
1010
75.00
30227
2/07/90
PRE -PAID
12.00
CH MMER RiG
01-4040 -4120
6.00
CHARGER KM
01-4140-4120
2/14/90 2/14/90
18.00
JA1l-0
1010
18.00
30254
2/13/90
MESTONM CHARGER OF COMER VENDOR TOTAL
93.00
TOTAL ALL YOM
47,490.30
C)bl /
•
sil
PAGE l
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE 2/16/90
AP-0O2-01
CITY OF FM
TIME 10.25.00
VENDOR
INVOICE DUE HOLD
PRE -PAf0 DW
NO. INVOICE NO
DATE DATE STATUS
ARM.
OESCRIPTION
ACCWTT "BER
AMOIRNT DEMO DATE
AM
15.89
JAN OFFICE SPPLIES
01- 4040 -2100
5.97
JAN OFFICE SUPPLIES
01- 4090 -2100
49.69
JAN OFFICE SUPPLIES
01 -4140 -2100
89.47
JAN OFFICE MPPLIES
01-4190 -2100
5.97
JAN OFFICE SPPLIES
01- 4340-2100
7.76
JAN OFFICE SUPPLIES
01- 4280 -2100
2.98
JAN OFFICE SPPLIES
71-7100 -2100
2.98
JAN OFFICE SUPPLIES
73-7300-2100
2.98
JAN OFFICE SPPLIEs
78- 7800-2100
7.02
JAN OFFICE SUPPLIES
01- 4020 -2100
2/16/90 2/16/90
190.71
JRII-CD
1010
ACRO-NI
VENDOR TOTAL
190.71
A0411
20.00
NO MEMB-WilRELL
01-4150 -2200
2/16/90 2/16/90
20.00
JRNL-CD
1010
ASSN OF MN 1)UMEY MGRS VENDOR TOTAL
20.00
80600
28.00
MUFFLER
22-4170 -3820
2/16/90 2/16/90
28.00
JPri-M
1010
IAMB AG,YWIVE
VENDOR 'MAL
28.00
80621
30.00
MAP PARKING LEASE
01-4280-4200
30.00
MAR PARKING LEASE
73- 7300-4200
30.00
MAR PARKING LEASE
78-7800-4200
2/16/90 2/16/90
90.00
JRNL-a
1010
BALBOA MINNESOTA COMPANY VOW
TOTAL
90.00
80530
66.99
89 PUR(34 -B FRANKLIN
01- 2040-0000
705.30
89 PARCH -8 FRANKLIN
40- 2040 -0000
201.02
89 PURM -B FRANKLIN
22- 2040-0000
2/16/90 2/16/90
973.31
JRNL-M
1010
BEN MANKLIN STORE
VENDOR TOTAL
973.31
80580
59.36
OIL
01-4290 -2250
2/16/90 2/16/90
59.36
JRNL-CD
1010
BILL CLAW( OIL CURRANT VENDOR TOTAL
59.36
80600
65.72
JAN GARBAGE -FIRE
22- 4170-3750
103.88
JAN GMBAGE-PM
01 4290-3750
44.52
JAN GARBAGE- STREET
01-4280 -3750
2/16/90 211600
214.12
JRNL -CO
1010
BLACKOMIAK AND SON
VENDOR TOTAL
214.12
B(hW
13.80
SCHOOL EcP -ROT
01-4140 -4110
2/16/90 2/16/90
13.80
JRNL -CD
1010
O O 2
BRADFORD ROT
VENOM TOTAL
13.80
C0960
31.
-* H!W
01- 4:80 - 2 W
600
PAGE 2
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE 2/16/90
AP- CO2-01
CITY OF MOUND
TIME 10.25.00
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
PRE -PAID CIRECK
NO. INVOICE NW DATE DATE STATUS
ANOINT
DE'.,CRIPTION
ACC0UN* NUMBER
AMOUNT CHECK t DATE
45.61
CBD GARBAGE CANS
01-4280-3750
20.93
JAN ME
01- 4290-2200
6.20
JAN NOME
01- 4290-2250
2.i9
JAN HOLE
01-4090 -2200
32.45
VCR FILM
01-4140-2200
27.74
LUMIERR
01- 4340-2300
23.39
JAN NOME
73- 7300-2200
9.15
JAN NDME
78- 7800-2200
185.06
JAN HOME
22- 4170-2200
2/16/90 2/16/90
385.24
JRK-0
1010
COAST TO COAST VENDOR TOTAL
385.24
C1079
320.67
Td ?..BE
01-4320 -3220
6.70
TELEPHONE
01-4040 -3220
.24
TELEPHONE
01- 4090 -3220
2.11
TELEPHONE
01- 4190 -3220
.63
TELEPHONE
01- 4095 -3220
64.31
TELEPHONE
01 -4280 -3220
119.41
TELP OE
73- 7300 -3220
32.16
TEIEII OE
78-7800-3220
149.26
TELEPHONE
71- 7100 -3220
63.36
TELEPHONE
01- 4340 -3220
65.13
TELEPHONE
22-4170 -3220
67.70
TEIEADE-COMPUTER
22- 4170-3220
432.25
TELEPHONE
01-4140-3220
2/16/90 2/16/90
1,373.95
JfiK-CD
1010
CONTINENTAL TELEmw VENDOR TOTAL
1323.95
C1108
42.00
CRIME FUND KTG -3
01-4140-4110
2/16/90 2/16/90
42.00
J K-0
1010
CRIME PREVENTION ADVISORY+ VENDOR TOTAL
42.00
01341
18.45
90 ID GUIDE
01-4140-4170
2/16/90 2/16/90
18.45
JRK-CD
1010
DRIVES LICENSE GUIDE CO10 VENDOR TOTAL
18.45
G1905
225.00
JAN ONE -CALL SERV
73- 7300 -4200
2/16/90 2116/90
225.00
JRK -CD
1010
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL, INC VENDOR TOTAL
225.00
01930
420.00
CRIME INTEIRROG-LIIQD
01-4140-4110
173.00
CHIEF INSTITUTE-HARRELL
01- 4140-4110
2/16/90 2/16/90
593.00
JRK-CD
1010
GOVT TRAINING SERVICES VENDOR TOTAL
593.00
H2ODO
45.54
SAMPLE CELL BOTTLES
73.7300-2260
2/16/90 2/16/90
45.54
JRNL -CD
1010
4AL1N COPANT VE?M TOTAL
45.54
•
60l
PACE 3
P U R C k A S E J O U R N A L
DATE 2/16190
AP- CO2-01
C I T I OF M101l1D1
TIME 10.25.00
VE]WOR
INVOICE DIE HOLD
PREPAID CHECK
NO. INVOICE NER
DATE DATE STATUS
MW
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N11W
AMO NT CHECK t DATE
H209D
39.27
STEEL FOR UNIT 12
01-4340 -3810
39.28
STEEL FOR UNIT 12
01-4290 -2200
2/16/90 2/16/90
78.55
JRNL -CD
1010
HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP
VENDOR TOTAL
78.55
M2120
7.35
JAN POSTAL VERIF
01- 4060 -3210
2/16/90 2/16/90
7.35
JRNL-CD
1010
RM CO DEPT OF PROPERTY T VDW TOTAL
7.33
12299
375.00
IACP- BOSTROM REGISTR
01-4!40 -4110
2/16/90 2/16/90
375.00
JRNL-CD
1010
IACP
VENDOR TOTAL
375.00
!2400
65.00
REPLACE BLOWER COVER, TIRES
22- 4170 -2200
2/16/90 2/16/
65.00
JRNL -CD
1010
ISLAND PARK SKELLY
VENDOR TOTAL
65.00
J2421
590.00
FEB JANITOR SERV
01- 4320-4210
50.66
FEB .iANITTOR SERV -PY
01-4280 -4200
50.67
FEB JANITOR SERV -PN
73- 7300-4200
50.67
FEB JANITOR SERV -PM
78- 7800 -4200
2/16/90 2/16/90
742.00
JRNL-
1010
J * S CLEANING CO.
VENDOR TOTAL
742.00
J2533
7.15
JAN MILEAGE
71- 7100-2200
2/16190 2/16/90
7.15
JRNL -CD
1010
JOEL KRI M
VENDOR TOTAL
7.15
J2534
451.70
REPAIR 89 PJ
73- 7300 -3810
2/16/90 2/16/90
451.70
JRNL -CD
1010
JOE'S AUTO 'BODY
VENDOR TOTAL
451.70
L29N
175.95
CHAIN SAN
01- 4280 -2200
2/16/90 2/16/90
175.95
JRNL-CD
1010
LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR
VENDOR TOTAL
In .Y5
L2930
986.20
JAN AUTO PARTS
01-4290-2310
42.57
JAN AUTO PARTS
22-4170 -2200
2/16/90 2/6/90
1,02P.77
JRNL -CD
1010
LULL'S AUTOMMOTIVE /11TC04 VENDOR TOTAL
1028.77
L2940
450.00
TREE REMOVAL
01-4340-5110
150.00
FVUVE BRLSH F!LE-LONG LAVE
01- 42Z1i -42(Y'
I,25t'�.00
TREE REMOVAL
81-43
2/16/9(1 .'1t
I,w
J!MG-CD
1010
LUTZ TREE SRV1-CE
VENCJ TOTAL
11�y
40.2-,
•
643
PAGE 4
P U R C H A S E J 0 U A N A L
DATE 2/16/90
AP- CO2 -01
CITY of nM
Tilt 10.25.00
VETGOI
INVOICE Dllf HOLD
P<i -PAID CHECK
NO. INVOICE MW
DATE DATE STATUS
AI401NT
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
MOUNT CHECK 1 DATE
.
M3040
135.00
MARCH ENFORS MINT
01-4095 -3800
2/16100 2/16/90
135.00
JRNL -CD
1010
MASTS CORPORATION
VEND OF TOTAL
135.00
M3079
310.22
IACP- BOSTROI -HDTE1
01 4140 -4110
2'!a
310.22
JRN1-CD
1010
O CCilidl l Cl( 'MNT; ;.
310.22
M3080
270.00
JAN ENGR- TUXEDO
26 -5700 -3100
376.00
JAN E]NGR -"SA
26-5700 -3100
150.00
.IAN ENGR-STREETS
01-4280 -3100
136.00
JAN E1GR- W 4 MAPS
01- 4190 -3100
90.00
JAN E?GR ANT1OlYS
01 -2300 -0000
166.00
JAN EMM DEIMBIGH -- ASSESS
26-1190-0000
473.00
JAN ETNGR -'90 DREDGE
81-4350 -31U0
30.00
JAIL ENGR -LOST LAID:
60- 6000-3100
90.00
JAN EIGR -TAJ FORFEIT
01-4320 -310C
63, 144.00
EINGR SERV-CITY HAIL AOOT'N
30 -6000 -5000
2/16/90 2/16/90
64,925.00
JRNL-a
1010
MCCOW FRAM( RODS
ASSOCI• VE14DOt TOTAL
64925.00
M3190
12.00
SHARFEN SAN CHAINS
01-4280 -2300
2/16/90 2/16/90
12.00
JRNL-CD
1010
MEYER'S MOUND SERVICE
VrvrlOt TOTAL
12.00
M3250
872.18
JAN SAS
01-4340-3720
422.29
JAN GAS
01- 4320 -3720
201.77
JAN GAS
71- 7100-3720
711.97
JAN GAS
22-4170 -3720
331.12
JAN GAS
01 -4280 -3720
389.56
JAN GAS
73 -7300 -3720
253.21
JAN GAS
78 -7800 -3720
2/161% 2/16/90
3,182.10
JRNL-0
1010
MINNEGASCO
VENDCIR TOTAL
3182.10
PMOO
27,215.00
1990 DI jU
81 -4350 -53%
3,480.00
1990 RIP RAP
"-1-4350-5300
2/16/90 2/16/90
30,705.00
Mt -CD
1010
MTVA PORTABLE DREDGE VEWM TOTAL
30705.00
N?710
17.49
K11L DROP
22-4170 -2200
2/16/90 2/16/90
17.49
,R+t-CD
1010
NAVARRE WINARE
VENDOR TOTAL
17.49
N3740
7 `?. 96
5T CBD
40 -fW 2200
33.00
3 T 1C RCCTCIE
01 -4270 -',' 0
786.96
,V+-CD
1010
•
643
PAGE 5
PURCHASE J0UFNAL
DATE 2/16/90
AP-00
CITY OF MOLID
TIME 10.25.00
VE?At1Et
INVOICE DUE HOLD
PRE -PAID CHEM
NO. INVOICE NM BR
DATE DATE STATUS
AMQI(T
OESCRIPT ION
ACCOl1NT NIJW
ANOINT CHEU I DATE
NEIMAN SIGNS
VE103OR TOTAL
786.96
N3770
1,110.04
METERS
73-7300 -4300
2/16/90 2/16!
1,110.04
JK-CD
1010
NORTH STAR WAT04MS PRO# VENDOR TOT
1110.04
M3779
36.86
REPAIR KIT-LINIT 19
01 -4290 -2310
2/16190 2/16/90
36.86
JDL -CD
1010
NORTHERN AUTOMOTIVE
VENOM TOTAL
36.86
N3900
353.79
,IAN ELECTRICITY
01 -4280 -3710
130.18
JAN ELECTRICITY
01-4340 -3710
452.79
JAN ELECTRICITY
01- 4320-3710
291.99
JAN ELECTRICITY
71-7100-3710
259.69
JAN ELECTRICITY
22- 4170-3710
2,426.59
JAN ELECTRICITY
73- 7300-3710
1, 626.77
JAN ELECTRICITY
78- 7800 -3 ;10
76.50
'89 ELECTRICITY
78- 2040 -0000
2/16/90 2/16/90
5,618.30
JMNL -CD
1010
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO VENDOR TOTAL
5618.30
P4031
184.00
3 -4 -5 HOSP-IERTS
71- 7100-1510
184.00
3 -4 -5 MOSP-R THARALSON
01 -4140 -1510
205.45
MARCH HOSP-N THARALSON
01-4140 -1510
2/16/90 2/16/90
573.45
Ji1L -CD
1010
PHYSICIANS OF MN
VENDOR TOTAL
573.45
P4119
3,150.00
ECON DEVEL PLAN -CDBG
16-5887 -3100
2/16/90 2/16/90
3,150.00
JRfL -CD
1010
PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS VENOM TOTAL
3150.00
54349
816.00
SPRAYER -PARKS
60-6000-5000
2/16/90 2/16/90
816.00
JK -CD
1010
SCHARBER L SONS
VENDOR TOTAL
816.00
54356
395.38
TOOLS
01- 4290-5000
2/16/90 2/16/90
395.38
J;W -CP
1010
SEARS
VOW TOTAL
395.38
S43o0
2,3[4.42
MARCH RENT
71 -7100 -3920
9.52
DAL OF JAN,FEB RENT
71 -7100 -3920
2/16; 2/16'90
314.44
,)fit -CD
1010
SH3RE_tINE PLAZA
VENDOP TOTAL
2314.
S4402
141.13
JAD i T 5
01- 4140:40
'12.37
CAP DECALS
01 4:4 :'DO
.116ix 2 15'
15�.`�
,RNL -CD
•
goy
40.5
PACE 6
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE 2/16/90
AP-0O2 -Ol
CITY OF MOM
TIME 10.25.00
VENOIIt
INVOICE QE HOLD
PRE -PAID CHECK
NO. IM*nICE NPW
DATE DATE STATUS
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUPWR
AMO NT CHECK 0 DATE
SILK SUZEEN PRODIETS
VENDOR TOTAL
45
S4430
15.50
FAX TO LARSON
01-4140 -2200
2/16, 2/16/90
15.50
JRNL -0
1010
SOS PRINTING
YEW TOTAL
15.50
S4437
93.00
I R DEPT ETSIEIS
73 7300 - 22M
2/16/90 2/16/90
93.00
,i01-CD
1010
SPECIALTY SCREENING
VENDOR TOTAL
93.00
S4499
218.41
REPAIR UNIT 3
73 -7300 -3810
1/16/90 2/16/90
2i8.41
,IRNL-CD
1010
STAR — WEST CHEV/OLDS
VENDOR TOTAL
218.41
$4580
416.67
WINE GARAGE DOOR
73-7300-4200
416.67
WIRE GARAGE DOOR
78-7800-4200
416.66
WIRE GARAGE DOOR
01- 4280-4200
2/16/90 2/16/90
1,250.00
JRNL—CD
1010
STEIK ELECTRIC CO
VE1I)O1 TOTAL
1250.00
54610
316.96
TIRES
78 -7800 -3810
1,150.32
TIRES
01-4140-3610
2/16/90 2/161%
1,467.28
J K
1010
SI BMAN TIRE CO
VE11DQt TOTAL
1467.28
S4M2
142.00
REPAIR CONTROLS
73- 7300-4200
2/16190 2/16/90
142.00
A&
1010
SYSTEMS SERVICE COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL
142.00
T4716
29.75
TEMP HELP
01- 4270-1300
2/161% 2/16/90
29.75
,AIL -CD
1010
TEMPORARIES M 00
VENDOR TOTAL
29.75
T4790
101.25
SENSOP-843
01.4290-2310
153.00
REPAIR 88 CELEB
01-4140-3810
2/16/90 2/16/90
254.25
JRIL-CD
1010
THIIRK 905 CHEVROIFT VENDOR TOTAL
2,4.25
74970
1,120.00
GARAGE OOOR-PW
01-4280-5000
1.120.00
GARAIE DOOR -Pw
01- 4190 -5rx'C
1,120.00
GARAGE W-PW
73 130(r VYx
1,120.00
GARAGE W -PW
1A -7800 -5000
2 [ /1E;9t
4,480.00
JRNL -CD
10;:
TWIN CITY 5WALf OOOP Q1 WWCP TOTAL
4480.00
J5(`-)
C)5.00
BA
r' 41 -4100
�'16/9C 2!l6jx;
4 <!'�.(X
,P11 -CO
10i9
40.5
PAGE 7
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE 2/16/90
AP- CO2 -01
CITY OF MQNII
TIME 10.25.00
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
PREPAID CHECK
NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STA7 AM W
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
AMIDINT CHECK I DATE
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED VENDOR TOTAL
405.00
k5425
111.65
TIRE DROPOFFS
01-4270 -4200
2/16/90 2/16/90
111.65
JR►L-a
1010
HASTE Off OF MN, INC - -TIR VENDOR TOTAL
111.65
M29
243.73
NCAN EXPENSES
16 -5886 -4100
2/16/90 2/16/90
243.73
JRNL-a)
1010
IESTONKA aMMITT ACTH Nt VENDOR TOTAL
243.73
W5670
35.00
PANTS-EWALD
Oi-4140 -2240
229.96
UNIFORM - RESERVE- LAIRSON
O1- 4150-2200
2/16/90 2/16/90
264.%
JML-CD
1010
WILLIAMS STORE INC VENDOR TOTAL
264.96
15750
332.86
DEC LEASE-1 ERO1 5052
01- 2040 -0000
332.88
JAN LEASE-XEROX 5052
01-4320-5000
402.86
FEB LEASE -XEROX 5052
01-4320-5000
2/16/90 2/16/90
1,068.64
JRML -CP
1010
XEROX CORPORATION VENDOR TOTAL
1068.64
TOTAL_ ALL VE)WRS
133,596.36
is
•
G0 L
APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT
_
CITY OF MOUND
J PHONE NO
NAME OF APPLICANT c
ADDRESS
treet Number City Zip
BUILDING OWNER
(If other than applicant ) Name Address
CONTRACTOR
Name / Address �; /
SIGN LOCATION [� �� �it re ��G'I
LOT BLOCK ADDITION
ALLOWABLE SIG NAGE @ = Square Footage
WALL AREA ey Ft. = TOTAL ZONING DISTRICT
EXISTING SIGNAGE NUMBER OF SIGNS SQ. FOOTAGE OF SIGNS
DESCRIBE SIGN (Materials, etc.)
HEIGHT OF SIGN ILLUMINATED: YES NO
SIGN SIZE BEING REQUESTED BY TYPE OF SIGN:
= SQ. FT. WALL MOUNT
LENGTH OF TIME SEASONAL SIGN TO BE ERECTED: FREE STANDING
PORTABLE
OTHEP
PLEASE DESCRIBE REQUEST AND REASON FOR REQUEST:
If additional informat:on is attached, please submit 8P X I1" maximum sized drawings.
C,
Applican s Signature T
Recommendation: °tom
Date submitted
APPROVED:
Building Official
168 R 9/85
Is sign for a community organization and does it meet all the standards of Section 55.38?
SPAGHETTI DINNER
SUNDAY,
1
FEBRUARY 25
i
AMERICAN LEGION HALL
25 WILSHIRE BLVD.
MOUND, MINNESOTA
nCKETS** $4. ALL YOU CAN EAT
� STUDENTS § SENIORS
FREE ,~6yEAR5 5 UNDER
WINE AND DESSERT EXTRA
ZAKE SALE
The City of Mound hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and
hold harmless the Minnetonka Sportsman Club, Inc., its officers,
employees and agents from any and all claims, causes of action,
lawsuits, damages, losses or expenses out of, due to, or in
connection with the City of Mound employees conducting firearms
training exercises at the range owned by the Minnetonka Sportsman
Club, Inc.
The City of Mound agrees to have a certified firearms
instructor on site conducting all training involving city per-
sonnel.
LAKE MINN ETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
arb FEB 2 0 X590
LAKE USE CO L'Ii FTE'E
A C 1: N D A
4:30 p.m., Mondav, February 26, 1990
1. Follow up to Hennepin County Lake Improvement report of 1 -22 -90
to
(A) Review and prioritize the 1990 Hennepin County Lake improvement
projects.
(B) Resolve appropriate buoy markings for channels experiencing
low navigational water.
2. Personal Watercraft draft ordinance, preparation on process,
anticipated distribution by 2.23.90
3. Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol Report:
1. Report on mecting of 2 -19 -90 with charter boat operators.
2. Fish house clean up progress.
3. Incident reports.
4. Additional husiness by the committee.
PLEASE. CONFIRM YOUR ATTF;NU,iNLF
AT THE 2/28 BOARI) MEETING
TO ASSURE A QUORUM /
2 -16 -9O
LAKE MINNETONKA
1990 HENNEPIN COUNTY LAKE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
PROJECT EST. COST
Buoy and Sign Maintenance $41,000
Price Agreement Contract 54,500
Coffee Channel Dredging - High volume of traffic, large
boats, sewer line in channel to be abandoned May to
July 1990. Center of channel 3' deep with sides much less.
Forest Lake Channel Dredging - 2.5' depth will prohibit safe
passage by many boats. Problems include access until Coffee
Channel is dredged (could be July) or long haul, if accessible
via Cooks Bay (possible winter dredging).
North Arm Channel Dredging - 2.5' depth, high volume of traffic,
sewer line may prevent dredging until July.
Noerenberg Channel Dredging - 3.0' depth, critical only under and
very near C.R. 51 bridge. Small estimated cost and large ,oat use.
Tanager Lake Channel Dredging - 3' depth is hazard for number of
boats using this channel because of commercial docks.
Maintenance of County public accesses, remove hazards such as logs,
dock sections, fish houses, tree trimming in channel areas, etc.
Special Fund
Car removal from lake (winter months) 2,000
Buoys
Replacement Buoys 15,000
TOTAL $112,500
Note - Depth of channels after dredging to be 3.8' below 925.4 - today's el. (DNR policy
- No dredging from April 1 throuyh June 30 (UNR Fisheries policy)
LKMTKA
1%22/90
p '
Jennings
f `'\
Ba y
Harrisons Bau
Secon
Lake
£ncra
Lek
Cooks
Da
/ 7 �3 7 Bau
.7
1
_stcads Bay
SOURCE :'U. S. G. S.
GWELS AM ACCESSES MAINTAI E) BY HEM TUIN COUNTY
(SHOWN EI CIRCI )
Stubbs .Bay
Grays
RobinsAs Libbs
B3 y Lei►e
St. Louis
Bay
) CaZ ' SOns
- i
St..Rlbans
Bay
xxceAsior Bay
APP., 2
L PAC.' rw Mr,
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Mears Park Centre. 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
612 222 -8423
February 16, 1990
To Municipal Users
Commission's System:
RECD FEB 2 01990
of the Metropolitan Waste Control
The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) has
scheduled pre- budget breakfast meetings for elected officials
and staff of municipalities who are users of the MWCC system.
This meeting is to seek input from you prior to establishing
the MWCC's 1991 Draft Budget.
Three March meetings have been scheduled in various locations
around the metro area. We hope that you will be able to
attend one of the scheduled meetings. Meeting dates and
locations are:
March 9 - 7 :30 -9:00 a.m. -
March 12 - 7:30 -9:00 a.m. -
Ramada Inn
I -94 and White Bear Ave.
St. Paul
(reservations due by
March 6)
Sheraton Northwest
I -94 and Co. Rd. 81
(exit #31)
Brooklyn Park
(reservations due by
March 9)
March 16 - 7:30 1:00 a.m. - Radisson South
7800 Normandale Blvd.
Hwy 100 near Hwy 494
Bloomington
(reservations due by
March 13)
In mid -to -late May the MWCC will schedule budget breakfast
meetings to present the 1991 MWCC Draft Budget. Comments
from both the March and May meetings will be taken into
consideration in drafting the the 1991 MWCC Operating and
Capital Bud This budget is presently scheduled for a
public hearing at the MWCC Board Meeting on June 19, 1990.
The operating and capital budgets for 1991 are scheduled to
appear for approval on the July 7, 1990 meeting agenda of
the MWCC Board of Commissioners.
To place your reservation for a pre- budget breakfast meeting,
call Larry Struck at 229 -2100.
Fr; ,I r" , " Aff. ,•, i f. A;.ImiFq,
•
CITY OF MOUND
1990 BUDGET REPORT
EXPENDITURES
JANUARY 1990 8.3%
/007
JANUARY
YTD
PER CENT
BUDGET
-
EXPENSE
EXPENSE
- - - - --
VARIANCE
- - - - --
EXPENDED
- - - --
GENERAL FUND
- - - --
- - - - --
-
Council
63890
10607
10607
53283
16.60%
Cable TV
10150
8666
8666
1484
85.38%
City Manager /Clerk
166310
14428
14428
151882
8.68%
Elections
11400
1367
1367
10033
11.990
Assessing
43320
24
24
43296
0.06%
Finance
162030
12251
12251
149779
7.56%
Computer
22150
1833
1833
20317
8.28%
Legal
80900
3100
3100
77800
3.83%
Police
717850
68942
68942
648908
9.60%
Civil Defense
2750
30
30
2720
1.09%
Plan..:ng /Inspections
145000
8321
8321
136679
5.74%
Recycling
60670
118
118
60552
0.1S%
Streets
382890
27561
27561
355329
7.20%
Shop & Stores
61440
4216
4216
57224
6.86%
City Property
84200
2678
2678
81522
3.18%
Parks
148560
5461
5461
143099
3.68%
Summer Recreation
11310
0
0
11310
0.00%
Contingencies
30000
100
100
29900
0.33%
Transfers
122270
10048
10048
112222
8.22%
GENERAL FUND TOTA
2327090
- - - - - --
179751
- - - - - --
179751
- - - - - --
2147339
-- - - - ---
7.72%
- - - - - --
Area Fire
Service Fund
214290
14800
14800
199490
6.91%
Liquor Fund
163450
2 07 17
20717
142733
12.67%
Water Fund
347930
27939
27939
319991
8.03%
Sewer Fund
771560
51108
51108
720452
6.62%
Cemetery Fund
3680
804
804
2876
21.850
Docks Fund
62950
10829
10829
52121
17.20%
/007
•
CITY OF MOUND
1990 BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
JANUARY 1990 8.3%
JANUARY YTD PER CENT
BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED
-- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - --
GENERAL FUND
Taxes
1262190
2172
2172
1260018
0.17%
Intergovernmental
780860
0
0
780860
0.00%
Business Licenses
9950
12
12
9938
0.12%
Non- Business
Licenses and
Permits
86700
2097
2097
84603
2.42%
Charges for
Services
34800
873
873
33927
2.51%
Court Fines
95000
0
0
95000
0.00%
Charges to Other
Departments
20000
1835
1835
18165
9.18%
Other Revenue
49300
15
15
49285
0.03%
TOTAL REVENUE
2338800
7004
7004
2331796
0.30%
LIQUOR FUND
900000
62138
62138
837862
6.90%
WATER FUND
360000
23123
23123
336877
6.42%
SEWER FUND
590000
47599
47599
542401
8.07%
DOCKS FUND
62950
9018
9018
53932
14 33 °-
CEMETERY FUND
2000
800
800
1200
40.00%
•
•
dab
TO MUNICIPALITIES AND COUNTIES IN NSP'S
ELECTRIC SERVICE .ERRITORY
Re: Minnesota Purlic Utilities Commission
Docket No. E- 002/GR -89 -865
On November 2, 1989, Northern States Power Company ( "NSP ")
filed for an electric rate increase with the Minnesota Public
Utilities Commission ( "PUC "). The Commission has referred
this filing to the Office of Administrative Hearings for
evidentiary and public hearings.
In accordance wit!: Paragraph 4b of the Commission' Notice
and Order for ?fearing dated November 29, 1989, attached is
the r.etice cf sched-.:led Public and evidentiary hearings to
be held i.n this Pr seeding.
If there are quest'ons, fee- free to call the undersigned.
DAVID ... i.AWPF.:C�
D'rector - Law
Attachment
•
409
Northern States Power Company
Law Department
Gary 1 John
414 Nicollel Mall
AH -na
VCO w
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
Gene R Sommen
08,041 A. Lawrence Jaca F. slwwwa
Telephone (612)33&6600
Ramon s rower
D .,saor - uw Drrecsor —Lai.
Wnrers Dirwn ray Numo.r
Fax No (612)331}7558
aa „
S � C Aa
Harold J Bagley
I Y g
JoAnn M WGwre
James L unman
February 9, 1990
HoPosV W
Donnelloa L R"
Chen L Bn■
Michael J Hanson
RE"' FEB '_
TO MUNICIPALITIES AND COUNTIES IN NSP'S
ELECTRIC SERVICE .ERRITORY
Re: Minnesota Purlic Utilities Commission
Docket No. E- 002/GR -89 -865
On November 2, 1989, Northern States Power Company ( "NSP ")
filed for an electric rate increase with the Minnesota Public
Utilities Commission ( "PUC "). The Commission has referred
this filing to the Office of Administrative Hearings for
evidentiary and public hearings.
In accordance wit!: Paragraph 4b of the Commission' Notice
and Order for ?fearing dated November 29, 1989, attached is
the r.etice cf sched-.:led Public and evidentiary hearings to
be held i.n this Pr seeding.
If there are quest'ons, fee- free to call the undersigned.
DAVID ... i.AWPF.:C�
D'rector - Law
Attachment
•
409
RATE INCREASE NOTICE:
HEARINGS SET ON NSP'S
REQUEST FOR ELECTRIC
FATE INCREASE
Puhhr hem uws ;,,^ s.hedulcd on ,albc it "lalt'S Po"er t owl, ,n,'s W lurtl
(;tic ITT ;Anv NY' e4•�I,:, ewtomcr n!av al) lu';ir 0r n!,tf.e a stalcnlnu a; Il ene I,cu.n�, 1 �
muted h, n,Ll, t•is ") IT S ...:h .n the nJ ry u., s 'I"d yu.J„1 t,I ""I s elr, If,, scIS1._.. !Lc 1; �. „I macs
or other re!a! m:utcn l -,u cat n,.( r.eco 10 be h, ;w antvucv 1 he hcm,lw% will hr
1'UCSa!:n' l)1:. VA,•,' u�•al:ry '.1, i,nt.11��. •!1.
March 6, 1990 lvir I 1.111 MaItII I1, 19'X) I If
71X11 lit I lwy 10 & 41h Si _ N E. , 30 p m. Aud!Iwr .un
, (At S. NIT �1
11'cdnculay St Cloud lln AA:nuna
March', 19'X1 ( 0mtcil Chan!bcts Nf.uJl '_0, 19'X) ( mil" l Chamfers
7 it, . 4 'tX)1`u,. I'll Iloor
207 1
Monday Ccx >n Rapius \ \. I:ICStiay Meul.uo
Match 12, 1990 Sr Center Room March 21, 1990 ( mined Ch:unhrrs
7: 1323 Coon Rapids 111,& 7 00 p m. 202 P. Jac! ;on
T1r5d.ty' St Pcul
March 13, 1990 Ad,minsttalion Budding,
1 00 p.m. SO shcrhurne A,e.
Room 11611
F idemmi hrannGt for prcwf,1311011 01 1`01111.11 diltct Icslnnnnv, rchull.,l ,m.1 inncbullnl
Ics(imony, and nuts- Qt:II1II TIM 1111 of I11a1 Irtlintouy arc scheduled lo, Momlav, •1p0i v, 19'X1, anti
thelcaf(cr as needed, 41X1 a.nL, large Ilcaring 12o0u!, 7th f :uor, American ( -c ter 11uJdrug, wIt P
Kellogg Blvd., St. Paul, ,,MN 551(11.
Inforutaliun ahrut the public and csidculi:uy l,carmgs Ilia% lie ohlained f nnn Mr Richard
C Lens, Office of Adm1Ilh(ralrve Ilearirgs, 511, Moor, hour F +.change Pm;dmg, 310 f ouril, Vrnue
South, Minneapolis, MN 55415.
N.SP has asAcd , hc .%I;nnearta Put hi U1limcs 11,r a it i !,cril (11_
ntllh0nl rllon't: ut clecuh; Ic P:,rt of lh;!; tula!, a it 9! percenl (S( null,on) Ia!,
maease is now rcllccicd : :I custornus' h,;IS subject In (cloud.
the Public hr.u,ngS will pro,ulc an opptalunl,s 1 „r cuslntners:u,d othe Ilfc,!ed t.l the
proposed inercasc to p,cscnl turir v,c +vs to the vimm;slr,live I-aw Judgc and Il,e I'U(
.
A,ert.l;e MonO,1) hill
Rc,iduuiat
1'se Pre-m Inichill Prupn.ed
2s11 K \ \ H alh ! $17 I SI _
r,
Xl K VA 11 14 69 37 fN )8 ():
'SO 6 , AA 11 49 'y s 1 - 54 7g
I(r.X) ;:N I I 64 8� h9 16 71 `1
Small Grnrrd Senl(e
I se I'restnl Inlcnm Pn,p—t(I
51X)K%4II S )I S J') S .11
I illy) K \\ I I i4
2(XX) K I I.% f IT, 4rI
(:cwt- ,,l1
I' I)rm3nd Present Initrim Proposed
Ih, 4u
tiSI' Itl (Jl I X11 II I III It.41I ({11 \I,I Ills, 81111 1) 1111)\ 1 I Ill 4Lti ^,I tiOI
I'I'lllll'lill11111�I11M11t ^ \ \I
P; NI IIll ItlIII ItiIII)
( If. \Nt;l S, 1% 11IfOf I (;1t IN 1 \'.I) 4111,111 (,It \N I 1 I I „`I It (1It (,121 \ I I It
Itil 81 AS1 111 )1 `•I It P I
(,n'.,,� .•,1.n,. �a1 f L A, ,....u; r .r i4.; e, :r.,1 ! 1.� h �,. I, Il:......r:l ,. I� , '.
1 heI., 1 ,: r.1
•
c Tll ()I N1( A x \i )
•
•
February 15, 1990
TO: MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER
FROM: FRAN CLARK, CITY CLERK
RE: LOT 3, BLOCK 2, WESTWOOD
This memo is to give you background material on the above lo- in
case you are asked NOT to recertify special assessments.
In 1983, Lot 3, Block 2, Westwood, (PID #23- 11'/••24 23 0014), went
tax forfeit. It was a drainage ravine before the storm sewer was
installed and had become a collector of peDple's junk. At that
time this property had $5,412.12 in special assessments against
it from before original forfeiture and $4,973.47 in special
assessments against it from after forfeiture.
In May 1984, Resolution #84 -75 released this lot to Hennepin
County for public auction and certified the special assessments
Against the property. The property was released because it is
over 10,000 square feet.
No one purchased the property.
1n May of 1985, Mr. Frank Drey contacted the city by letter
scatting he would be interested in purchasing this lot if the City
would cancel. the $4,973.47 in special assessments because the lot
"is a swamp and is unbuildable ".
In May 1935, I wrote a memo to the City Council 'copy - Attz ch
cxplaining the back. 1round and asking the Council to cancel
x8297 in the amount of x4,973.47 because the lot is unbuildable.
The Coui!cil parsed Resolution #85 -63 cancelling the levy an'_i
iMP; , sing certain conditions, i.e. sell such lands only to o ncr
1
411
of lands adjoining at a non - public sales so that s ai d lands will
be combi, for tax and land use purposes
Mr. Drey purchased the lot from the County that year. When the
County sells property to an adjoining property owner they inform
the person of the conditions. (See attached sheet from Herr pin
County that the purchaser must read and sign.)
In January 1990, Mr. Drey called me and asked aaout the $4,973.47
levy that had been cancelled. He stated he has, over the past
several years been having contractors fill the lot and now his
neighbor would like to build a house on the lot. I informed Mr.
Drey and ultimately Mr. McKinney that if this lot is built upon,
the $4,973.47 would Le recertified and become due and payable
upon building permit issue. They do not feel this should be
done. Their contention is that there are costly soil corrections
that need to be made before the lot could be built upon; the city
has no records showing there is sewer or water stubbed to this
lot (another expense to the owner) ; and adding all the costs
together including the street assessment ($4,973.47) would make
the lot too expensive.
I tried to explain that we cannot treat this lot any different
than we would any other lot in the city as far a special
assessments are concerned. I also explained to Mr. Drey when he
pays for this lot in full to the County, they will require that
he combine it with is current tax parcel as that was ene of the
conditions he was sold the lot. He would then have to come to
the City for a subdivision and at that time the special
assessment would be recertified to the parcel.
This memo is for your informatio,i in case either Mr. Drey or Mr.
McKinney appear at a Council Meeting.
fc
l
•
Gil.
e I S
ti (
4 �
h S V
'r vex• � �,
2'037
.588 59 W
(60 )
OUTLOT A
te r. v�l s" yl) ' g . r,
Jp
l - S
,y
23 0
r \GO
Jog
I 06
�Sd
•
(7)
� y
14 w �= �/•
4,LL10 J� Y
4J
\• '� L 3
17)
kL—
�' 0
d' 511
0ti �e 1.)
(e9)3 F( 7), r �
GIs,
r.kd 1l0
iu
0.
V
Jy •,c l; t_�::
43,
RD
s
3)
10
EVERGR j,D
I 2 �� J c• a � 5 �+ l
1 �
{u �
1[161 1? S x 1041 Doc H.
>>o12 3 �,
� 94�z
RESOLUTION NO. 84 -75
RESOLUTION RELEASING CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS
TC HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PUBLIC AUCTION AND
CERTIFYING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Mound has been informed by the
Department of Property Taxation of Hennepin County that certain
lands within the City have been forfeited for non - payment of real
estate taxes; and
WHEREAS, the parcels do comply with the City's zoning
ordinance or building codes and are not adverse to the health,
safety and general welfare of residents of this City; and
WHEREAS, all special assessments were cancelled at the
time of forfeiture and may be reassessed after the property is
returned to private ownership pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
282.02 (also note: M.S. 429.07, Subd. 4; M.S. 435.23 and M.S.
444.076); and
WHEREAS, all special assessment that have been levied
sine forfeiture shall be included as a separate item and added
to the appraised value of any such parcel of land at the time it
is sold (M.S. 282.01, Subd. 3);
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Ci�y Council of
•
the City of Mound,
Minnesota:
1.
That the following
parcels of
tax forfeited land are
released to the
County of
Hennepin for public
auction and the C hereby certifies the following
special assessment:,:
AMOUNT
BEFORE
AMOUNT AFTER
FORFEITURE
FORFEITURE
PAR CEL
LEVY 0 _AMOUNT
LEVY # AM OUR
23-117-24 23
001 2771
1,577.82
8297 4,973.47
3180
936.50
3388
2,897.30
24- 117 -24 41
0012 31c0
1,872.97
8297 4,309.94
3388
2,928.87
3397
1,732.91
25- 117 -2 11
0023
93.48
8297 4,325.90
i3 r��
1 r 4 X9.35
2.
The
C, �_, ,
_,. F• �,,, _ty au`h
and
=,,,
, _,. _ _ d iar..s for
61�
1
imposing the lien of special assessments on said
lands.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
� Charon and seconded by Councilm- Jessen
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Charon, Jessen, Paulsen, Peterson and Polston.
The following Councilmembers voted in the nlegative:
none.
i
Mayor
�il A /nVe/Nil r - nea2
Attest: City Clerk
I *
L /S'
NORTHWESTERN NA'I'IUNA,, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 0
FRANK W DHF �. i LVI SECCOND VICE PHE,1CF',7 s, ,rEMs
May 6, 1985
Mr. John Elam
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear John:
5': 37; 1135
I am inte -ested in acquiring the tax forfeited lot next to m; property
in Mound. The PID of this lot is 23- 117 -24 23 0014. I live at 6228
Westwood Circle.
I am requesting ..hat the assessments on this property be dropped. The
lot is a swamp and is unbuildable. I will buy the lot if the assessments
are cropped, but it is not worth the price that includes the assessments.
I appreciate your looking into this matter for me.
Sincerely,
Frank W. Drey
6228 Westwood Circle
Mound, I•IN 55364
616
(TIN()I NVA'N1)
May 13, 1985
T0: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITE CLERK
Attached is a letter from Mr. Frank Drey who abuts a tax forfeit lot
(Lot 3, Block 2, Westwood) on Westedge Blvd.
Mr. Drey would like to purchase this lot. The lot, square footage wise,
is buildable, but if you look at the lot it ;s a ravine that collects
people's junk and thus is unbuildable as is.
The City released this lot for public sale in Resolution X84 -75 (attached).
It has $5,412.12 in assessments before forfeiture and $4,973.47 in
asses_r.ents since forfeiture. This totals $10,385.59• The County has
is appraised the lot at 52,000.00. To this $2,000.00 is added the assessments
since forfeiture of 54,973.47, making the cost of the lot $6,973.47. Mr.
Drey feels this is overpriced when the $4,973.47 is added.
In 1984, Resolution 984 -94 was passed ( "Setting a Policy on Assessments
Placed on Tax Forfeit Property Before Forfeiture "), enclosed. This
dealt with undersized, unbuildable lots not correctly sized, unbuildable
lots.
As Resolution x84 -94 states, "Our goal is to get property back on the
tax roles ''.
If the Council wishes to cancel the $ 1 ,973.47 worth of assessments since
forfeiture ow in one resolution, and c_. the remaining assessmen•
($5,412.12) from before forfeiture after the property is purchased by
Mr. Drey, I am sure he will buy the lot for 52,000.00 and we will get
8oF (S1,600.00) toward the $5,412.12 (assessments from before forfeiture).
f
•
enc.
417
y7
May 21, 1985
RESOLUTION NO. 85 -63
RESOLUTION CANCELLING LEVY 18297. IN THE AMOUNT OF
$4,973.47 ON LOT 3. BLOCK 2. WESTWOOD
(PID #23- 117 -24 23 0014) AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY
BOARD TO IMPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SALE OF
SAID TAX FORFEIT LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SALE
TO OWNERS OF ADJOINING LANDS
WHEREAS. the City of Mound was informed- by the
Department of Property Taxation of Hennepin County that certain
lands within the City were forfeited for non - payment of real
estate taxes; and
WHEREAS. on May 8, 1984, in Resolution #84 -75, the City
of Mound released the above described property for public sale
and certified the special assessments; and
WHEREAS. it has now been found that the lot is
unbuildable because of a deep ravine which was at ong time used
for drainage; and
WHEREAS, the City was instrumental in obtaining
lo-gislation which would allow said parcels to be withheld from
n public sale and sold at a non - public sale to eliminate nuisances
1 and dangerous conditions and to increase compliane with land use
J ordinances and Minnesota Laws of 1982 Chapter 523, Article 39,
Section 6, was adopted to provide said authority to the City and
the County; and
WHEREAS, a property owner adjacent to this lot would
like to purchase the lot in order to eliminate nuisances and
dangerous conditions, but the cost of the assessments since
forfeiture in the amount of $4,973.47 make the lot undesirable.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED tnat the City Council of
the City of Mound hereby cancels Levy #8297 which is against Lot
3, Block 2, Westwood (PID 023- 117 -24 23 0014), in the amount of
$4,973.47 because this is an unbuildable lot.
1. The County Board is hereby requested to impose
conditions on the sale of the following described lands, and is
further requested to sell such lands only to owners of lands
adjoining at a non - public sale so that said lands will be
combined for tax and land use purposes ana will comply witn City
ordinances and regulations:
PID 023- 117 -24 23 0014 - Lot 3, B1cck 2, Westwood.
SPECIALS LEVIED BEFORE FORFEITURE: LEVY #3180 936.48
#3388 2,381.84
#3563 1,097.49
WL-�
May 21, 1985
2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized ana
directed to release the aforementioned lands for sale, subject to
. the County imposing the aforestated conaitions ana the lien of
special assessments on said lands.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Counciimember
Paulsen and seconded by Counciimember Peterson.
The following Councilmembers voted in the artirmative:
Paul.:in, Peterson, Polston and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Councilmember Jessen was absent ana excused.
�� /• 0
C' C&ck—
Attest: City Clerk
z V?
A w.IC ST'S - All tax forfeited land offered at a public auction is sold to the highest
blW er.
SALES OVER TIC CMWM - Parcels not sold at a public sale may be purchased after the sale
by paying the appraised value of the parcel. Prices cannot be changed unless the parcel is
reappraised, republished and again offered at a sabseq e-nt auction.
TE M - Sale of $150.00 or less - Full payment at sale
we of to $1,500.00 - 20% down or $150.00, whifiever is greater, balance
in five ins is
Sale of $1,501.00 or more - 20% down, except 10% an all parcels containing
structures, balance UT-ten (10) annual installments
The interest rate of the urVaid purdgase price is a variable rate per M.S. 549.09.
Appraocimately 30 days before installments are due, a billing will be mailed to indicate the
arrant of the installment and accrued interest which is due. Any or all installments may
be paid in advance.
FEES - At the time of the finLu payment the following fees will be added:
Tvariable) Assurance fee (3% of the total sales price at the time of the sale)
$20.00 State deed fee
$18.00 Deed filing fee
(variable) State deed tax ($1.65 per $500 of the purchase price or a fraction thereof)
CC1WMCKS - Sales are subject to existing leases, to building restrictiau appearing of
recococa at the time of forfeiture and to easements obtained by any governmental subdivisiai
or agency thereof for any public purpose. The appraised value does not represent a basis
for future taxes. Contact the city where the land is located for details of building codes
or zoning laws. ALL PFCPEMY IS SOLD "AS IS" AND MAY NOT CII0Cfd'l TD LOCAL BUILDIND, AND
CNIM CFtDMNM. TAE CCX,tM KUM NO WAFU N TW Tim LAND IS "BUIIllABI.E". ALL SALES
ARE F'INkL, AND ND FU UM CR DUMMS ARE PERMITTED.
If a parcel had cancelled special assessments, as indicated an the publication list,
appra dmately 90% of the purchase price will be applied to the published amount of special
assessments. Arry remai.-iing balance may be reassessed by the municipality. Local
improvements not yet assessed, and special assessments levied after forfeiture, must be
assumed by the purchaser.
TITLE - The purchaser will *eccive a certificate of sale at the time of purchase. it*
C m ssioner of Revenue will issue a deed from the State of Minnesota after full pant is
made. Tax forfeiture may create a break in the chain of title, and services of an attorney
may be necessary to make the title marketable.
DEFAULT - Contracts may be cancelled by the County Board of Ccamissioners if the purchaser
& aa - ts by failure to pay an installment and interest when due, or failing to pay current
takes hpcm na due during the term of tine contract.
CODE C31PLIANCE - If any tax forfeited parcel on which there is a substandard structure is
offered at an auction, the purchaser, as a cordition of sale, shall present and file a
certificate of code canpliance with the Director of Property Tax and Public Records of
Hennepin County within one year after the date of purchase from the county.
•
The undersigned acknowledge(s) receipt-of a corrp ete copy of this statement on this
day of 19 , prior to the purchase of tax forfeited land
in He innep n County�iaudersi state that he or she has read and understands the
statement. 0
signacure(s)
620
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MAY 2, 1985
CANCEL ASSESSMENT ON TAX FORFEIT LAND - LOT 3, BLOCK 2, WESTWOOD
The City Manager explained that this is a tax forfeit lot, that
Mr. Drey wishes to purchase (it adjoins his property), but it has
a large street assessment on it in the amount of $4,973.47 and
since the lot is unbui'dable because of the deep ravine in it he
would like the assessment cancelled. It is an eyesore and
collects people's ,junk. By selling the lot to Mr. Drey it would
be put back on the tax roles.
Councilmember Paulsen :stated that he has checked into this lot
and has found that to fill it in would be financially not
feasible so he would agree with the recommendation to can the
assessment
Paulsen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 185 -63 RESOLUTION CANCELLING LEVY :3297, IN THE
AMOUNT OF $4,973.47 ON LOT 3, BLOCK 2,
WESTWOOD (PID 123 - 117 -24 2- 0014) AND
REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARC TO IMPOSE
CONDITIONS ON THE SALE OF SAIr TAX FORFEIT
LANDS AND TO RESTRICT THE SeLE TO OWNERS
OF ADJOINING LANDS
The vote was 4 in favor with Councilmember Jessen absent ana
excused. Motion carried.
Mcund City Code
Section 610 - Water Department
Section 610:00
Section 610 :00. Establishment of Department and Office of Sup There is
hereby established z City Water Department under the supervision of a Superintenden:
thereof.
Section 610 :05. Duties of Superint It shall be the duty of the Super-
intendent of `he Water Department to:
(a) Supervise the operations of the Department;
(b) Receive applications for service;
(c) Control all privately -owned water meters;
(d) Receive notification of meter breakage, stoppage, or other irregularity;
(e) Test operation of meters as provided herein;
(f) Adjust water service charges in the evert of a defective meter as
provided herein;
(g) Permit temporary water use from hydrants as provided herein;
(h) Regulate, limit, or prohibit lawn sprinkling as provided herein;
(i) Under special circumstances and under such conditions as he or she may
require:
(1) permit or prohibit opening of streets and tapping of mains while
the ground is frozen;
(2) permit multiple service from one connection where the properties
are a single ownership or where there is no water main on the
streets on which the secondary properties abut;
(j) Shall authorize or prohibit operation of connections from the mains to
the curb box.
Section 610:10. i�pplicatioa for Installation of Servi_e Connections Property
ow ners desiring service connections made to their premises must file an application
with th_ Superintendent on blanks provided for this purpose. Each application must
be accowpanied by the payment of the charge specified in Section 610:45. Upon
payment of sucn charge and allowance of the application, the Superintendent will
allow the :onnection from main to curb b -x to be installed by a duly registered
plumber.
Section 610:15. Service Connection Certificates; Payment of Special Fe in Lieu
of Assessments No permit shall be issued to tap or connect with any water main of
the City either directly or indirectly from any lot, tract, or parcel of land unless
the City Clerk shall have certified:
(a) c_ such lot or tract of land to be served by such connection or tap
has, been assessed for the cost of construction of the water main with
which the connecticn is made; or
(b) If no assessment has been levied for such : onstruction costs, that
proceedings for levying such assessment have been or will be commenced
in due course; or
(c) That the cost of construction for said water main has been paid by
the developer, owner, or builder platting such lot or tract of land;
this shall not include lots or tracts of bind served by the
municipal water system and which were not a part of the plat or trait
developed; or
Mound City Code
Section 610 :20
(d) If no assessment has been levied and no assessment proceedings will be
commenced in due course, and the developer or builder of the lot, tract,
or parcel has not paid the cost of improving said lot, tract, or parcel
of land, that a sum equal to the portion of the cost of constructing said
water main which would be assessable against . lot, parcel, or tract
of land has been paid to the City of Mound.
If no such certificate can be issued by the Clerk, no such permit t- tap or conne:t
with any water main shall be issued unless the applicant shall pay a fee in addition
to any fees charged under Section 610 :45, which additional fees shall be equal to the
portion of the cost of construction rf said main which would be assessable against
said lot, tract, or parcel to be served by such tapping or connection. Said
assessable cost is to be determined by the City Manager, who may obtain the assistance
of an Engineer, and said cost shall be upon tt,e same basis per front foot as any
assessment previously levied against other property for the said main or, if
no such assessment has been levied, jpon the basis of the unifo:i charge for front
foot which may have been or which will be charged for similar tapping or connection
with said main, determined on the basis of the total assessable cost of said main
allocated on a frontage basis; where the assessable costs cannot be so determined,
the charge shall be at a rate as set by the Council in Section 540:00 per front foot
of the property to be served, with a ?er lot minimum to be determined by the
Council. The resident is to take care of service connection.
Any sum received by the City under this Section shall be paid into a special suspense
account until it shall be determined by the City Council whether the property
served by said connection under said permit will be assessable for any other water
mains; if it shall be determined that no other main shall be so assessable, then
said fee shall be credited to the funds for the water main to which the connection
was made, but if the tract or lct served by the connection is subsequently assessed
for another water main, such sum shall be transferred to the fund for said main, and
credited against the amount assessable against said lot, tract, or parcel.
The City Council may, by its resolution, and upon receipt of a "Consent to Assess-
ment" form signed by all owners of the property, provide that any charge for water
connection as provided in this Section may be transmitted to the County Auditor
of Hennepin County, to be extended on the proper tax list of tie County, to be
payable '.n no more than ter (10) annual installments as a special assessment against
the property, and to provide further that all assessments and interest collected by
the County Treasurer therefrom shall be pad over to the City Treasurer in the same
manner as other municipal taxes.
Section 610 :20. Conte of Appl Applications must state the purpose for
which the water is to be used, together with a proper description and location of
the property and must be signed by the owner or his or her authorized agent. The
application must :,:e distinctly the point on the property line .There the service
is to enter the premises.
Section 610 :25. Service Contract The Ctiy reserves the right to make any such
further rules and regulations an
necessary for the preservation
system. The rules, regulations,
d to change the rates from time to time as may be
protection, and proper operation of the water
and water rates hereinafter to be named shall be
Mound City Code
Section 600 :45
and identification, shall at reasonable ti-aes be pe : - mitted to enter upon all
properties for the purpose of Inspection, observation, measurement, sampling and
testing in connection with the operation of the municipal sanitary sewer system.
Section 600:45. Rates and Charges.
Subd. 1. Rates and Charges _ Counci fi ction . Rates and charges for the
collection and tteatment of sewage shall be as set by the Council in Section
540:00.
Subd. 2. Availability Char ge. Until such time as connection to the public
sewer system has been made as requited by Section 600::0. Subd. 3. of this
Code. all non - conforming premises abutting on streets or other places where
municipal sewer mains are available shall pay a minimum charge per quarter for
the availability of sanitary sewer services as set by the Council in Section
540:00.
Subd. 3. Unusual Wastes - Special Fates As to ary sewage or industrial
waste which is unusual in either character or amount, the City Council. reserves
the r'ght to impose such supplemental sewage rate charge as said City Council
shall determine is reasonable and warrarted on the basis of all relevant
factors, in addition to all applicable charges hereunder.
Section 600:50. Service Connection Certificate - Payment of Special Fee in Lieu
of Assessment No permit shall be issued to tap or connect with any municipal
sewer system of the City wither directly or indirectly from any lot, tract, or parcel
of land unless the City Clerk shall have certified:
(a) That such lot or tract of land to be served by such connection or tap
has been assessed for the cost of construction of the sewer main with
which the connection is to be made; or
(b) If no assessment has been levied for such construction cost, that
proceedings for levying such assessment have been or will be commenced
in due course; or
(c That the cost of construction for said sewer main has been paid by
the developer, owner, or builder platting said lot or tract of land; this
shall not include lots, parcels, or tracts served by the municipal sewer
system and which were not a part of the plat or tract developed; or
(d) If no assessment has been levied and no assessment proceedings will be
completed in due course, and the developer, owner, or builder of the
lot, tract, or parcel has not paid the cost of improving said lot,
tract, or parcel of land, that a sum equal to the portion of the cost
of constructing said sewer which would be assessable against said lot
or tract has been paid to the City of 'found.
I£ no such certificate can be issued by the Clerk, no such permit tc tap or connect
to said sewer main shall be issued unless the applicant shall pay an additional
connection fee which shall be equal to the portion of cost of construction of said
main which would be assessable against said lot, tract, or parcel, to be served by
such tapping or connection. Said assessable cost is to be determined by the City
Mound City Code Section 600 :55
Manager and the City Assessor wtko may obtain the assistance of an Engineer, and
said costs shall be on the same basis per front foot as any assessment previously
levied against other property for the said main or, if no such assessment has been
levied, upon the basis of the uniform charge per front foot which may have been or
which shall be charged for similar capping or connection with said main, determined
on the basis of the total assessable costs of said main allocated on a frontage basis;
where the assessable cost cannot be so determined, the charge is as set by the
Council in Section 540:00 per front foot of the property to be served, with a
minimum of 80 foot frontage in Residential Use District A -1 and 60 foot frontage
in Residential Use District A -2. Any sum received by the City under this ordinance
shall be paid into a special suspense account until it shall be determined by the
City Council whether the property served by said connection under said permit will
be assessable for any cther sewer main; if it shall be determined that no other main
shall be so assessable, then said fee shall be credited to the fund for the sewer
main for which the connection was made, but if the lot, tract, or parcel served
by the connection is subsequently assessed for another sewer main, such Gum shall bf
transferred to the sum for said main, and credited against the account assessable
against said tract or lot. The City Council may, by its Resolution and upon
receipt of a "Consent to Assessment" form signed by all owners, provide that any
charge for sewer connection, as provided by this Section, be transmitted to the
County Auditor of Hennepin County to be extended on the proper tax lists of the
County to be payable in not me than twenty (20) annual installments, and to provide
further that all assessments and interest collected by the County Treasurer there-
from shall be paid ever to the City Treasurer in the same manner as other municipal
taxes.
Section 600.55. Permits, Licenses, Fees, Bond and Insurance
Subd. 1. Application Required - Permit Fees - Double Fee Pen ilty
Any person desiring to make connection to the Municipal Sanitary Sewer
System shall comply with the City Code. The application shall be submitted
on blanks furnished by the City, and shall be accompanied by plans,
specifications, and such other information as is eesired by the City
Irspectcr, together with a permit and inspection fee as set by the Council
in Section 540 :00. All costs and expenses incident to the installati_ ana
connection shall be bo n.e by t`e owner and the owner shall indemnify the City
for any loss or damage that may directly or indirectly be occasinned by the
iustallation of the sewer connection including restoring streets and street
surfaces. Any person, firm, or corproation who shall commence work of any
kind for which a permit is required under this Section 600 or under Section
310 hereof, without first having received the necessary permit therefor, shall,
when subsequently securing such permit, be required to pay double the fees
provided by this Section 600 for such permit and shall be subject to all
the penal provisions of this Section 600. Any application for connection
permit shall state dhether the subject premises has paid an assessment and, if
so, the amount so assessed, the legal description of the premises as originally
assessed, the zoning use classification of the property at the time of the
application, and the zoning use classification of the subject premises at the
time when assessed.
Subd. 2. Registered Pl umber Required - Du ties of City Inspector.
Permits shall only be issued when the applications show that the work is
to be done by persons who have been duly registered pursuant to Section
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
February 12, 1990
Those present were: Acting Chair Frank Weiland, Commissioners
Geoff Michael, Jerry Clapsaddle, Michael Mueller, and Bill Voss,
Council Representative Liz j ^nsen, City Planner Mark Koegler,
Building Official Jan Bertrand, City Manager Ed Shukle, and
Secretary Peggy James. Those absent and excused were: Bill
Meyer, Bill Thal, and Ken Smith.
The following citizens were also present: John Royer, Gerry
Dodds, Gene Peterson, Brenda Peterson, and John Mayer.
M INU14S:
MOTION made by Mueller seconded by Clapsaddle to approve
the Planning Commission Minutes of January 8, 1990 as
written. Motion carried unanimously.
BOARD OF APPEALS:
a. Case No. 90 -902: Applicant City of Mound. ZONING
MODIFICATION: To allow 11 Dublicly owned outdoor storage" as a
conditional use in t he B -1 zone. PUBLIC HEARING
City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed his recommendation for the
proposed zoning modification. Koegler noted the changes which
were made as a result of the Planning Commission's previous
review at their January 8, 1990 meeting. The suggested defini-
tion is as follows:
PUBLICLY OWNED OUTDOOR STORAGE: Storage of any goods
equipment, materials, merchandise, supplies or motor
vehicles not fully enclosed in a building for more than
a twenty -four hour period. Such facilities :rust be lo-
cated on land owned by the City of Mound. All materials
stored on -site must be owned or used by the City of
Mound.
The performance standards which Koegler suggested to be added to
Section 23.702, are as follows:
1. Front, side and rear setbacks shall be thirty (30) feet. In
areas where storage abuts a residential use or zone,
side and rear setbacks shall be fifty (50) feet.
2. Open storage areas shall be properly grades' f -r drainage
purposes and shall maintain a dust controlled environ-
ment.
'. Incineration or reduction of waste material other than
government sponsored recycling activities shall be
prohibited.
6�1
Planning Commission Minutes
February 12, 1990
Page Two
4. Storage of impounded vehicles and equipment is prohibited.
5. Publicly owned outdoor storage shall comply with all other
performance standards identified in Section 7 of the
Mound Zoning Code.
The performance standards were reviewed and briefly discussed by
the commission.
Acting Chair Frank Weiland opened the public hearing. No
citizens were present to speak on the issue, therefore the Acting
Chair closed the public hearing.
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Clapsaddle, to
recommend to the City Council approval of the zoning
modification to alloy Publicly Owned Outdoor storage as
a conditional use in the B -1 zone as per the City
Planner's Report. Motion carried unanitou3ly.
The City Council will hold a public hearing for this case on
April 10, 1990.
b. Case No. 90 -903: Applicants: Bruce i Gerry Dodds of Coast -
to -Coast and John Royer of Ben F ranklin. ZONI
MODIFICATION: To allow "accessory seasonal outdoor retail
sales" as a conditional use in the B -1 zone. PUBLIC HEARING
City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed the background of the sub-
ject request to allow "accessory seasonal outdoor retail sales"
in the B -1 zone. He referred to the outdoor sales at the Ben
Franklin store which has been in operarion for several summers,
however the Building official notified Ben Franklin that the
volume of their outdoor sales had grown to the point that a
zoning ordinance amendment was required to allow such use. Coast
to Coast also has an interest in opening outdoor sales for
landscaping products. Koegler explained that allowing this type
of sales will benefit both the customers and the business owners.
Koegler suggested that in order to permi, an adequate review of
such proposals, the use could be allowed under a conditional use
permit rther than a permitted accessory use. In addition, by
allowing such use under a conditional use permit, gives the City
adequate control to ensure that the outdoor sales areas are aes-
thetically pleasing and do not have a negative impact on sur-
rounding properties.
Staff recommended that the Manning Commission recommend that
Section 23.625.3 of the Mound Zoning Code be modified to add
"Accessory Outdoor Retail Sales" to the list of conditional uses,
and to be defined as follows in Section 23.302 of the Mound
r�
•
•
4 ;t :k Zoning Code:
Planning Commission Meeting
February 12, 1990
Page Three
"Accessory Outdoor Retail Sales - Retail sales areas that
are covered by a roof structure and are enclosed by
walls, fencing or other suitable materials. Such uses
shall be accessory to the principal retail structure and
shall not exceed 20% of the floor area of the principal
structure."
Mueller questioned how extensive does the outdoor sales have to
be before a permit is required? For example, what if, for in-
stance, Meyer's station displayed lawn mowers outs =:ae for sale,
would they be required to obtain a permit? It was determined
that if a structure is constructed and attached to the principal
building to enclose or cover the area to be used for sales, then
a permit would be required.
Mueller questioned if a roof should be required. Wnat about
Christmas tree sales? or pumpkins? It was determined that the
sales areas do not necessarily need to be covered, however, it is
important to have the parameter defined by enclos.ng the area
with a suitable material.
Commissioner Michael was recognized as arriving at 8:34 p.m. Ac-
t -ng Chair Frank 'eiland opened the public hearing.
The allowable area of 30% as stated in the suggested definition
was contemplated. The commission discussed the need for allowing
such a great percentage of area. It was determined that both Ben
Franklin and Coast to Coast plan on using much less than 20% of
their floor area. Tt was also determined that it is better to be
more restrictive now, than not to have that option in the future.
The Acting Chair closed the public hearing.
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Jensen to recommend
to the City Council approval of the zoning modification
to allow "Accessory Outdoor Retail Sales' as a condi-
tional use in the B -1 zone, using the following
definition: "Accessory Outdoor Retail Sales - Exterior
retail sales areas that may be enclosed by u fills, fenc-
ing or other suitable material. Such uses sha?1 be ac-
cessory to the principal retail structure and shall not
exceed 20% of the floor area of the principal struc-
ture . $'
Jensen questioned why Mueller changed the definition to say 11 . .
* areas thcl: may be enclosed by walls, fencing, ." Mueller
commented that he is concerned about the interpretation of
"enclosed by," commenting that it sounds too restrictive.
Koegler stated that it is necessary to define the parameters, and
that this may be done with any suitable material, such as a small
berm, stacked railroad ties, shrubs, etc. 4.23
Planning Commission Meeting e
February 12, 1990
Page Four
Jensen moved, Mueller seconded to amend the previous mo-
tion, by changing the definition to read as follows:
"Accessory Outdoor Retail Sales - Exterior retail sales
areas *fat are enclosed by walls, fencing or other
suitable material. Such uses shall be accessory to the
principal retail structure and shall not exceed 20% of
the floor area cf the principal. structure." Motion
carried unanimously.
b - A y
The City Council will hole a public hearing for this case on
March 13, 1990.
c. Case No. 90 -904: Gene i Brenda Peterson, 6017 Ridgewood
Road, Lot 18, Block 6, The Hig PID X23- _ 117 -24 -43
0031. VARIANCE F ront Yard Setback.
Building Official, ,Ian Bertrand, reviewed the applicants request
to construct a one story garage addition onto the existing two
stall attached garage within one foot of the front property line.
Bertrand explained that a variance was granted for this property
in 1974 which allowed a lot area of 8,027 square feet, a 5 foot
front yard setback, 6 `oot and 10 foot side yard setbacks, and a
50 foot (plus) lakeshore setback. The property has approximately
a 20 percent slope towards the lakeside and the shape of the
front property is a triangle which makes it difficult to setback
a structure to the 30 foot setback with a 20 percent grade. The
concrete driveway is presently encroaching onto the neighbors
property. If storage is the intended use of this addition, there
is room for an accessory building to be constructed on the
lakeside of the property. She also commented that there are
electric power transmission lines along the street front of the
property. Staff recommended that the variance be denied.
Owner and applicant, Gene Peterson, spoke on his behalf. Mr.
Peterson reported to the commission that he is only attempting to
mimic the layout of the garage next door which is setback closer
to the curb than his proposed structure. He stated that 70% of
the garage will be below grade, with only 2 tc 4 feet of the
builcing visible at street level. Mr. Pete: - scn suggested that
the fill which will be removed to construct the addition,
(approximately 80 cubic yards) could be added to the berm at the
street side to help hide the structure. His intended use for the
garage addition is vehicle storage, therefore, the suggestion by
the Building Inspector to construct a storage shed at the lake
side is not feasible. The NSP wires which are erected at the
street side are high enough that the garage should not interfere.
Mr. Peterson proceeded to distribute phctr)graph�; of r,eijhboring
properties stating that he will be further away from ttie curb
than any of the other homes, in addition, a variance was (jr, -1ntc.d
Planning Commission Minutes
February 12, 1990
Page Five
for the structure three doors to the west of his home. Bertrand
pointed out that one of the garages was constructed without a
variance as it complied with the setback requirements for
detachpi accessory buildings. She reminded the commission that a
detached garage built on a lakeshore lot can be setback S feet
from the front property line if the doors face the side lot line.
Mueller questioned the type of tree which stands where the
proposed garage will be erected. Peterson stated that the tree
is a maple, and it is in poor shape since NSP trims branches
yearly to ;seep it away from the power lines.
Mueller commented about the curve on Ridgewood Road at the sub-
ject property, and questioned visibility; will adding to the berm
hinder visibility? The applicant did not feel that a problem ex-
isted.
John Mayer, who is Mr. Peterson's neighbor to the weft, stated
that he supports the proposed addition and so do all the other
neighbors. He is also in favor of any upgrading in the neighbor-
hood.
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Voss, to approve the
setback variance to construct an attached garage addi-
tion 1 foot from the front property line as shown on the
plan. Motion carried unanimously.
This case will be heard by the City Council on February 20, 1990.
DISC USSI.ON I
DNR App #90 - 6173 to dredge_a Seton La ke_, appl
Roger Bec kel L 4961 Ba Blv
DNR Ap plication 90 -6192 to insta a sand blan ket_ at_Phelps___Bay
api5lied by Mark _Goldterg� X853 Lsland_View D rive .
Mueller commented on Application #90 -6173 stating that he
preferred not to see the island diminished in size as shown on
Exhibit C.
The commission then discussed Application #90 -6192 and the status
of Mr. Goldberg's boathouse which is to be moved off the cor^ons
by Sprinq 7990. The ccmmission suggested that a bond be pcsted
to ensure Mr. Goldberg roves his boat house.
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Jensen to recommend
both DNR Applications #90 -6173 and 490 - 6192 he rnproved
with comments acknowledged. Motion carried unrnir,. u�,
62s
Planning Commission Minutes .
February 12, 1990
Page Six
These applications will be forwarded to the City Council for ap-
proval at their meeting on February 20, 1990.
City Council Representative Report.
Jensen reviewed the City Council meeting of January 9, 1990 and
January 23, 1990, and the agenda for the February 13, 1990 meet-
ing.
MOTION made by Clapsaddle, seconded by Jensen to adjourn
the meeting at 10:04 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Chair, Bill Meyer
Attest: is
426
0
•
s
THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL INVITES YOU
TO ITS STATE OF THE REGION 1990 MM FEB 14 1W
HOUSING... REBUILDING OUR VISION FOR THE '90s
I' 7 100 ,
Hyatt Regency Minneapolis • 1300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
08 r11
^o
T he I'Pg)% promise major .hinge fur the hou,me marko in the Tw to Cities
:Area Slowed population gro th the agmg o1 the p and our
housing saKA all signal the .omnrg , hinge \1 hat w Ill happen In a weakened
mirAeI for rental units and starter home H,w. ,in we hest meet the uo lnc
housing needs of hm- Ineome people' NtV we he ahle to pre,"r,c
aging nt:ghN It s time I, ihillinge our a,Wmption, aN housing
and desel„p a new sistun for the 1")1
R 4:"� ,1 natlehlr At
..n inE RAmp ientrame „n Ittn S, \,,al!rr k
1 . n Crmrr, Play ."'j, I,",
I'.: kunip Icn,r„r e• , n L',h S, an.. 'n.1 i,
Ile, "t .i Hull kemp ,con en.r nn lhh tit .¢r? At•ryuatc 4
I, r" "wr plre,c "'d It'' I Vn. tin,. ,h,,1, L.r
Sil M the Rce,nd to hcn .,, h
It, ina,I n, ti. , n
St Pe,,l W, c,inl Phan. '•rl h„Mi
11 b u!!,nd tit,: \i.tt, r k, , ,, . �, \i.r t. - I'nrt
pR&x�RAM
I'tt kf(�iV1K -AIluA
I In 'A FICUA1F
1 4S AL1 %()I I ADDkf s\
1
It 41 IbIt s1 \(, 4(; %%04
4� \TATF 11 1 HI kI (Jr rN -1
t 11It /(!I %/WI'H h)A w:(Jrrstl
Hill 1r \(, 1' I,�l
.. K.
i! ftRF.4k
1< (,F \Fk41 sf1 \Itis,
LC1E.11!\(, ( \1 o Herr Ir \e; S1R41/( ;)
N. rlrr„ r „r
ldnrr; tb,nr” ,
It .
IIt �'J III l.rI r
Ir ti(k'I'.I Hr 1' k
Vtrcel - sa.trc,, n tM t)IA\I-.k
n gNARI)II PH `.I \ 1 %1Ir IN
( .,. tit.tt. /q• I -,., ( I f NN(, tit stilt IN
La?7
Pic— rNu,rr ^m umnnumg cau.uu— I n,r. —.., ,,,,, "pin'..r