1990-04-10 CC Agenda PacketF CITY COUNCIL PACKET'- 4/10/90 #1
•
6. t30lM '8 ON am APPLICATION 290 -6225
7. CAIOW 28 AND SUGGMSTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRURNT
6. MOUMON TO TRANSFER $124,204 FROM THE COWUW=
PU= CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND TO Tilt CtNNZRCE
PIACE DEBT SERVICE FOND TO CLOSE OUT THAT FUND Pg. 1007
9. REQUEST FROM DUTCH IAIIE HOlIEOWNERS 011 CONTROL
OF EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL IN DUTCH LAKE Pg. 1006 -1014
10. BID AWARD: 1990 SEALCOAT PROGRAM Pg. 1015 -1016
11. PAYMENT OF BILLS Pg. 1017 -1031
12. I UM2102/ 12 RLLUNOOS
A. Department Head Monthly Reports for
March 1990 Pg. 1032 -1064
B. LMCD Representativets Monthly Report for
March 1990 Pg. 1065 -1066
C. LMCD Mailings Pg. 1067 -1069
PAGE 931
PLEDGM OF ALIMGIANCE
A OwM XIVV MS O TU MARCH 27, 1990 UWX AR
spa
I TO BIDER A NmItt" " ill
San" om TO AUL" I a
NOW SMAM A OOI"�011AL
i� Im ESTAdKISMD PERFO In ki CM STAN4ARna IN
eftrsm BUSS ( B -1) SONS
4 •
OW W. 90-9 V'ASXAMC11 REQUEST FOR P AM
Wes, 2197 OAUIMAL LANio LOTS 15 t 16,
am 1, AmNliit. LINCOLN ADDITION TO lamnIDS
PW PID ;13- 117 - 34 0012.
an vmwc maim TO CON8101M A CONDITIONAL USE
'&
OWSM '1`O AUM TBWORAU SBASONAL OV=OR MTAIL
s.
SAM AT 3250 C=== BOUMUM. (SUGfiESTED
Q*TX1 AML 24, 1990)
•
6. t30lM '8 ON am APPLICATION 290 -6225
7. CAIOW 28 AND SUGGMSTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRURNT
6. MOUMON TO TRANSFER $124,204 FROM THE COWUW=
PU= CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND TO Tilt CtNNZRCE
PIACE DEBT SERVICE FOND TO CLOSE OUT THAT FUND Pg. 1007
9. REQUEST FROM DUTCH IAIIE HOlIEOWNERS 011 CONTROL
OF EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL IN DUTCH LAKE Pg. 1006 -1014
10. BID AWARD: 1990 SEALCOAT PROGRAM Pg. 1015 -1016
11. PAYMENT OF BILLS Pg. 1017 -1031
12. I UM2102/ 12 RLLUNOOS
A. Department Head Monthly Reports for
March 1990 Pg. 1032 -1064
B. LMCD Representativets Monthly Report for
March 1990 Pg. 1065 -1066
C. LMCD Mailings Pg. 1067 -1069
PAGE 931
•
Ll
•
D. Planning Commission Minutes of
March 26,1990
Pg. 1071 -1075
E. REMINDER: League of Minnesota Cities 1990 Annual
Conference to be held in Duluth, June 12 -15, 1990.
Please let Fran know before May 15th if you plan
to attend.
F. REMINDER: Farewell Reception for Jan Bertrand,
Friday, April 20, 1990, beginning at 4:30 PM,
American Legion, Mound. RSVP regrets only to
Linda.
G. Letter from an attorney representing the Na-.ional
Marine Manufacturers AsF ziation (NIMMA) .r.- !sting
to the LMCD's proposed ordinance regulating
personal watercraft. Pg. 1076 -1079
H. Memo from League of Minnesota Cities (LMC)
RE: LMC Legislative Policy Committees. If
you are interested in serving on one of their
committees, please let Fran know as soon as
possible. Pg. 1080 -1081
I. Economic Development Commission Minutes of
March 29, 1990. Pg. 1082
PAGE 932
0161
0 March 27, 1990
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 27, 1990
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, March 27, 1990, in the Council
Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea
Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also
present were: City Manager Edward J. :'hukle, Jr., City Clerk
Fran Clark, City Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer John
Cameron, Building Official Jan Bertrand, and the following
interested citizens: Dotty O'Brien, Peg Kamholz, Cathy Bailey,
Bernice Putt, Tom Gamble, Sandie Kirsch, Pat Meisel, Wm. Thal,
Buzz Sycks, Ted Parent, Art Ridgeway, Rex Alwin, Jon Nelson, Dave
Morse, Dan Hessburg, David Clarke, Susan Wilkins.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in
attendance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
1.0 MINUTES
MOTION made by Jessen seconded Johnson by to approve the
minutes of the March 13, 1990, Regular Meeting and the March
20, 1990, Committee of the Whole Meeting, as submitted. The
vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.1 PUBLIC BEARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
City Manager Ed Shukle explained that the revised amount was
$3,948.39. Mayor Smith opened the Public Hearing regarding
delinquent utility bills.
DAVID CLARKS, 3054 Brighton Blvd. was present asking the
City do more to make the public aware that when renting or
buying a home in Mound the water bill must be changed to
their name and a check should be done to determine if there
is a delinquent bill.
There was no one present in the audience who wished to speak on a
specific delinquent bill. The Mayor closed the Public Hearing
and turned the item back to the Council.
Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 90 -37 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT
UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,948.39
AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT -OFF
WATER SERVICE TO THOSE ACCOUNTS
•
q3
36
March 27, 1990 •
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.2 PUBLIC HEARING: CASE #90 -906: CONSIDERATION OF A ZONING
MODIFICATION TO THE ZONING MAP AT 5545 TERSE POINTS BLVD.,
ALEXANDER PARK, BLOCK 1, LOT 1. (REZONE FROM GENERAL
BU8INE88 B -2 TO Two FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R -31. APPLICANT:
CATALYST PROPERTIES. INC.
The Building Official reviewed the background and the request.
The Staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
request to rezone.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. Jon Nelson, Catalyst
Properties was present and stated that if this is approved the
developer will be requesting a subdivision to build 2 single
family homes on this parcel.
The City :Manager stated that a letter has been received from
FinaServe, Inc. objecting to the rezoning btit not giving any
reasons why they feel this would adversely affect their property.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following:
ORDINANCE #42 -1990 AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN LANDS FROM
GENERAL BUSINESS(B -2) TO Two FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL (R -3)
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.3 PUBLIC HEARING: YEAR ZVI 1990 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM
The City Manager explained that there is $62,634.00 in the Year
XVI CDBG Program. He has proposed the following:
Westonka Senior Center /Operation $15,291.00
Senior Citizen Counseling 4,457.00
Westonka Intervention 5,700.00
WECAN 4,800.00
Rehabilitation of private property 32,386.00
The Mayor opened the public hearing. The following persons from
the following organizations spoke in favor of the proposed uses
listed above:
Tom Gamble, WECAN
Cathy Bailey, Coordinator, Westonka Senior Center
q,341
37
March 2', 1990
Susan Wilkins, Transportation Coordinator, Westonka Rides
Peg Kamholz, Senior Outreach Program
Dotty O'Brien, President, Westonka Senior Citizens
Dan Hessburg, Westonka Intervention
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RES0L0TI0N /90 -38 RES0LUTI0N APPROVING TEE PROPOSED
PROGRAM FOR YEAR ZVI, 0RBAN EENNSPIN
COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUND, AND AUTEORIEING ITS SUBMITTAL
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.4 BID A NA RD : CITY HALL ADDITI0N AND REMODELING
r�
The City Manager reviewed the background and introduced the
Public Facilities Task Force. The City Council thanked the task
force for all the time and effort they have put into this project
over the past two years.
The City Engineer reported that the following bids were received:
Shir loeffel- En9strand Shaw- lundouist George F. Cook
Ba se Bid $758,490.00 $763,400.00
Alternate •1 - Additionst Square
Footage in Police Chief's Office
ADO 11,059.00 5,000.00
Alternate 03 - Rewve Skylights and
Replace with Opaque Panels - ADD
Part 1 - One Group of 5 4,025.00 NO BID
Part 2 - Two Groups of 5 8,050.00 NO BID
Alternate 04 - Delete Council Desk
and Staff Desk - DEDUCT (5,943.00) (7,800.00)
Alternate 05 - CoMtete Keconstruction
of Existing Parking lot - ADD 4,807.00 4,200.00
$773,600.00 $776,000.00
4,000.00
7,300.00
3,500.00
NO BID
7,000.00
NO BID
(6,200.00)
(7,000.00)
3,500.00 5,700.00
X35
38
March 27, 1990
ease 0i
Altern It !1 - Additions! Sire
Footage in Police Chief fIs Office
ADD
Alternate its - ilalom Skylights and
Replace with OpsQm Panels - ADD
Part 1 - One Crop of 5
Part 2 - Two Grail of 5
More Palen! Frerichs
$787,900.00 S798,000.00 $&38,700.00
3,500.00 3,000.00 6,200.00
4,400.00 4,500.00 BO BID
8,000.00 9,000.00 110 BID
Alternate K - Delete Council Desk
WW Staff Desk - DEDUCT (7,000.00) (5,840.00) (6,500.00)
Alternate 05 - Coaplete Reconstruction
Of Existing Parking lot - ADD 4,500.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
The City Engineer explained that their recommendation is to enter
into a contract with Shingobee Builders, Inc. in the amount of
$763,297.00 which includes the base price and Alternate No. 5.
Action on any of the other alternates should be deferred at this Is
time. The project would be paid for from the Capital Improvement
Debt Service Fund.
Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -39 RESOLUTION TO AWARD THE BID CONTRACT FOR
THE CITY HALL ADDITION AND REMODELING
PROJECT TO SHINGOBEE BUILDERS, INC., IN
THE AMOUNT OF $763,297 AND DESIGNATING
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT DEBT SERVICE
FUND AS THE FUND TO FINANCE THE CITY
HALL PROJECT
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
The groundbreaking will take place on Tuesday, April 17, 1990, at
8:30 A.M. at City Hall.
1.5 SET DATE FOR ANNUAL BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Jensen to set Tuesday,
May 8, 1990, at 7:00 P.M. as the date for annual Board of
Review. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
q3(o
U
39
March 27, 1990
an
There was no response.
1.6 DISCUSSION: COMPRENgUsIVE PLAN UPDATE
The City Manager explained that this is before the Council to
make any comments they may have about Mound's Comprehensive Plan.
The Council asked that future sidewalk improvements, water
treatment and upgrading of lift stations be included in the
Capital Improvements section of the plan.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to send the
Comprehensive Plan back to the Planning Commission with the
recommendation that the following be included in the Capital
Improvements section: future sidewalk improvements, water
treatment and improvements to lift stations. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.7 RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED "NO sMOEING POLICY FOR CITY
OF MOUND FACILITIES
. The City Manager explained that the following changes were made
to the draft that was presented to the Council at the Committee
of the Whole Meeting, March 20th:
1. Island Park Hall and Mound Bay Park Depot be deleted
from the list because they are rented facilities and
are not considered formal work places.
2. That the no smoking policy be waived at the Mound Fire
Station for the fish fry and 2 bingo events.
The Mayor read the proposed policy to the audience.
The following persons spoke against the no smoking policy: Rex
Alwin and Buzz Sycks.
MOTION made by smith, seconded by Jessen to set April 24,
1990, at 7:30 P.M. to hold a public hearing on the proposed
no smoking policy (eliminating smoking in the work place).
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
•
437
1,4arch 27, 1990
• 1. _ OF a Y REQUEST .• , 2. 1990 MAIN DREDGI
2110JECT IN TNZ AMOUNT OF $6,094, 50 TO KINNETOMM PORTABLE
DUDG C O .
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to approve Payment
Request #2 from Minnetonka Portable Dredging Co., in the
amount of $6,094.S0 for the 1990 Maintenance Dredging
Project. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
0. • ! 1 't Y�� • X11• 1. 7 4: 1_I. z7
�.lY'!:_ 1, • � • _� � : � • • 1 11• 1•
The City Manager explained that Minnetrista is willing to allow
Mound to use their compost site in Minnetrista for the next year.
This site will be only for leaves and grass clippings. It _,rill
be a joint venture between the City of Minnetrista, the City of
Mound, the City of St. Bonifacius and Hennepin Cour *_y. In order
to do this Mound needs to approve the Mayor signir: a letter of
understanding.
Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: •
RESOLUTION #90 -40 RESOLUTION APPROVING LETTER OF
UNDERSTANDING WITH THE CITY OF
MINNETRISTA, CITY OF ST. BONIFACIUS,
CITY OF MOUND AND HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR
USE OF THE COMPOST SITE LOCATED ON CITY
OF MINNETRIBTA PROPERTY
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.10 REQUEST TO USE MOUND BAY PARR FOR WEIGH -IN ONLY FOR ST,
CLOUD BAS8MA8TER8 - SATURDAY JULY 14, 1990
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to allow the St.
Cloud Bassmasters to use Mound Bay Park for a weigh -in only
on Saturday, July 14, 1990, if they have all the necessary
permits, etc. from the L.M.C.D., Water Patrol, DNR, etc.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
•
:. ) OU14 co . ;. c ITT
• �1 y • c f. . • .
41
March 27, 1990
Ahrens moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -41 RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING APRIL 22 -28,
1990 AS MINNESOTA VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION
WEEK IN THE CITY OF MOUND
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
The Council asked that this resolution be sent to volunteer
organizations in the area.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to approve a
portable siqn to promote arena activities at the Harold J.
Pond Sports Center, 2121 Commerce Blvd. The sign will be
used approximately 4 times per year for not more than 10
days before the event. The vote was unanimously in favor.
Notion carried.
•
There were no comments on the above application for a sand
blanket by Mr. William R. Schuyler, 5351 Baywood Shores Drive.
1.13 PAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to authorise the
payment of bills as presented on the pre -list in the amount
of $130,623.00, when funds are available. A roll call vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.24 LICENSE RENEWALS
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded
renewal of the following licenses
1990, contingent upon all require d
being turned in:
Tree Removal
•
Aaspen Tree Service
Robert F. Dahlke
Eklunds Tree Service
Emery's Tree Service
Lutz Tree Service
Shorewood Tree Service
by Johnson to authorize
due to expire March 31,
forms, insurance, etc.,
4 39
42
March 27, 1990
Sutherland's Nursery i Tree
Rawker /Food vendor
Blue Bell Ice Cream
Commercial Dock
Al i Alma's Supper Club
Chapman Place Association
Boat Rental of Minnetonka, Inc.
Also there were no objections to v!w Post #5113 applying to
the State for their Class A Gambling License or the
Northwest Tonka Lions applying for a one day off -site
gambling location at the Pond Arena June 16, 1990, during
Mound City Days. The Council also waived the do day waiting
period for these two Gambling Permit. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.15 RELEASE OF EASEMENT ON LOTS 7 i S. BLOCK 18, WHIPPLE
The City Clerk explained that in the early 1980's an easement
with an incorrect legal description was filed on the above
property. Then a corrected easement was prepared, but the County
never took the original easement off the title. The City
Attorney suggested that the Mayor and City Manager execute a Quit
Claim Deed to the person owning the property relieving any
obligation to the City of Mound except those set forth in the
corrected easement.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Ahrens autuori$ing the
Mayor and City Manager to execute a Quit Claim Deed which
will release an erroreous easement on Lots 7 i 8, Block 16,
Whipple. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
INFORMATIONIMISCELLANE0O8
A. Planning Commission Minutes of March 12, 1990.
B. LMCD Mailings.
C. Financial Report for February 1990 as prepared by John
Norman, Finance Director.
D. Article from 3/21/90 S ailor on Hennepin County Recycling
reimbursement. Mayor Smith requested that this be placed in
the packet.
•
•
•
q41C?
•
43
March 27, 1990
E. REMINDER: League of Minnesota Cities 1990 Annual Conference
Lc. be held in Duluth, June 12 -15, 1990. Please let Fran
)uiow before May 15 if you plan to attend.
F. The City Manager informed the Council the Building Official
Jan Bertrand has resigned her position to become the Senior
Housing Inspector for the City of Richfield. Her last day
will be Friday, April 20. A going away party will be held
that evening at the American Legion in Mound.
NOTION zade by Janson, seconded Johnson by to adjourn at
9:50 B.N. The vote was unanimously in favor. motion
carried.
Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
• Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk
•
9H/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A DEFINITION FOR
'PUBLICLY OWNED OUTDOOR STORAGE' AND AMENDING
SECTION 23.625.3 OF THE MOUND CODE OF ORDINANCES
TO ADD PUBLICLY OWNED OUTDOOR STORAGE AS A CONDITIONAL
USE IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS (B -1) ZONE.
The City of Mound does ordain:
Section 23.302 (Definitions) of the Mound Code of Ordinances
is amended as follows:
The following definition shall be added:
89A. Publicly Owned Outdoor Storage - Storage of any goods,
equipment, materials, merchandise, supplies or motor
vehicles not fully enclosed in a building for more than
a twenty -four hour period. Such facilities must be
V located on land the City of Mound. All
s; �Q, ma eria s s ored on -site must be owned or used by the
C i t y of Mound.
/ furthermore,
Section 23.702 (Exterior Storage) of the Mound Code of
Ordinances is amended as follows:
The following shall be inserted immediately prior to the last
paragraph of Section 23.702:
Publicly Owned Outdoor Storage is subject to the following
conditions:
1. Front, side and rear setbacks shall be thirty (30)
feet. In areas where storage abuts a residential
use or zone, side and rear setbacks shall be fifty
( 50 ) feet.
2. Open storage areas shall be properly graded for
drainage purposes and shall maintain a dust
controlled environment.
3. In ineration or reduction of waste material other
than government sponsored recjcling activities shall
be prohibited.
0
n
U
974140*�
4. Storage of impounded vehicles and equipment is
prohibited.
5. Publicly owned outdoor storage shall comply with all
other performance standards identified in Section
7 of the Mound Zoning Code.
May or
Attest:
City Cler
r_1
�J
qy3
1
CITY of MOUND
0
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
CITY OF MOUND
iMOUND, MINNESOTA
0
5311 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55354
(612) 172 -1155
CASE NO. 90 -902
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MODIFICATION OF
THE MOUND ZONING CODE TO ALLOW PUBLICLY OWNED OUTDOOR
STORAGE AS A CONDITIONAL USE SUBJECT TO ESTABLISHED PER-
FORMANCE STANDARDS IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS (B -1) ZONE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30
p.m. on Tuesday, April 10, 1990 to consider adding "Publicly Owned Outdoor
Storage" as a conditional use in the Central Business (B -1) zone. The proposed
modification establishes a definition, allows the use by conditional use
permit and establishes performand* standard criteria for publicly owned
outdoor storage areas. The proposed change is no site specific. It represents
a change for the entire B -1 zone.
All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the opportunity
to be heard.
Francene C. Clark, City Clerk
0
Published in "The Laker" 3- 26 -90.
04141
•
n r a.: - s 3 ess . ....... s e a .. , .•s
MINUTEA OF a MEETING OF T8E
MOUND ADVIAORY PLANNING C0MMIgglon
February 12, logo
a. case ■o. to-
City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed his recommendation for the
proposed Zoning modification. Koegler noted the changes which
were made as a result of the Planning Commission's previous
review at their January 8, 1990 meeting. The suggested defini-
tion is as follows:
PUBLICLY OWNED OUTDOOR STORAGE: Storage of any goods,
equipment, materials, merchandise, supplies or motor
vehicles not fully enclosed in a building for more than
a twenty -four hour period. Such facilities must be lo-
cated on land owned by the City of Mound. All materials
stored on -site must be owned or used by the City of
Mound.
The performance standards which Koegler suggested to be added to
Section 23.702, are as follows:
1. Front, side and rear setbacks shall be thirty (30) feet. In
• areas where storage abuts a residential use or zone,
side and rear setbacks shall be fifty (50) feet.
2. Open storage areas shall be properly graded for drainage
purposes and shall maintain a dust controlled environ-
ment.
3. Incineration or reduction of waste material other than
government sponsored recycling activities shall be
prohibit 1.
4. Storage of impounded vehicles and equipment is prohibited.
5. Publicly owned outdoor storage shall comply with all other
performance standards identified in Section 7 of the
Mound Zoning Code.
The performance standards were reviewed and briefly discussed by
the commission.
Acting Chair Frank Weiland opened the public hearing. No
citizens were present to speak on the issue, therefore the Acting
Chair closed the public hearing.
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Clapsaddle, to
recommend to the City Council approval of the zoning
modification to allow Publicly Owned Outdoor Storage as
a conditional use in the E -1 zone as per the City
Planneria Report. Motion carried unanimously.
The City Council will hold a public hearing for this case on
April 10, 1990. 0-1:5
r�
PLANNING REPOF
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FRON: Mark Koegler, City Planner W""`_
DATE: January 10, 1990
SUBJECT: Publicly Owned Open Storage in the B -1 tone
At the meeting on January 8, 1990, the Planning Commission
discussed potential modifications of the zoning code to allow
publicly owned open storage in the B -1 zone. The purpose of this
amendment is to accommodate public works storage within a site to
be selected in the CBD area.
Amendment of the ordinance to allow public works storage involves
three items: 1) creation of a definition, 2) modification of the
use provisions of the B -1 section and 3) appropriate performance
criteria. In order to accommodate storage in the B -1 zone, the
following modifications are suggested:
Definition
In the definition section of the ordinance, add the following:
PUBLICLY OWNED OUTDOOR STORAGE: Storage of any goods,
equipment, materials, merchandise, supplies or motor vehicles
not fully enclosed in a building for more than a twenty -four
hour period. Such facilities must be located on land owned
by the City of Mound. All materials stored on -site must be
owned or iced by the City.
U:e
Publicly owned outdoor storage could be established as either a
permitted or conditional use. In most zoning ordinances, outdoor
storage for private entities is by conditional use permit giving
the approving authority maximum control. It is suggested that the
City of Mound hold itself accountable to the same standards used
for private businesses. Therefore, it is suggested that the use
be listed as conditional rather than permitted.
9 Ito
3030 H,trb t N- 1h g'd,, 11 i 1 rld M ,[,!,. MN ','447-2 61 2/553 -1950
Planning Report
January 10, 1990
Page 2
Establishment of outdoor storage as a conditional use would require
the following ordinance amendment:
Section 23.625.3 Conditional Uses add: Publicly Owned Outdoor
Storage.
Performance Standards
Section 7 of the Mound Zoning Code identifies performance criteria.
Section 23.702 identifies requirements for exterior storage with
the present emphasis on residential storage. This section could
be easily expanded to also include Publicly Owned Outdoor Storage.
Such a modification could be accommodated by inserting the
following Immediately prior to the last paragraph of Section
23.702:
Publicly Owned Outdoor Storage is subjer to the following
conditions:
I. front, side and rear setbacks shall be thirty (30)
feet. In areas where storage abuts a residential
use or zone, side and rear setbacks shall be fifty
(50) feet.
2. Open storage areas shall be properly graded for
drainage purposes and shall maintain a dust
controlled environment.
3. Incineration or reduction of waste material other
than government sponsored recycling activities shall
be prohibited.
4. Storage of impounded vehicles and equipment is
prohibited.
5. Publicly owned outdoor storage shall comply with all
other performance standards identified in Section
7 of the Mound Zoning Code.
•
o f d/7
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
January S. 1990 •
P ub IIcIy Owned Outdoor Storage (n the 13 -1 ZonIn 01strIc
City Planner. Mark Koegler. reviewed his recommendation for the
proposed zoning amendment which he submitted per the City
Council's request. Koegler reviewed the definition which he
created. as follows:
PUBLICLY OWNED OUTDOOR STORAGE: Storage of any goods.
equipment. fuel, materials. merchandise. supplies or
motor vehicles not fully enclosed in a building for more
than a twenty -four hour period. Such facilities must be
located on land owned by a local, county or state public
agency. All materials stored on -site must be owned or
used by said agency.
Koegler also informed the commission that they need to determine
If this use should be classified as a Conditional Use or a Per-
mitted Use within the 8-1 Zoninq District.
Koegler reviewed the performance standards which he suggested to
be added to Section 23.702. as follows:
1. Front, side and rear setbacks shall be thirty (30) feet. In
areas where storage abuts a residential use or zone,
side and rear setbacks shall be fifty (SO) feet.
•
2. Open storage areas shall be properly graded for drainage
purposes and shall maintain a dust free environment.
3. Incineration or reduction of waste material othev than
government sponsored recycling activities shall be
prohibited.
4. Storage of Impounded vehicles and equipment is prohibited.
S. Publicly owned outdoor storage shall comply with all other
performance standards identified in Section 7 of the
Mound Zoning Code.
Meyer questioned the meaning of "reduction of waste material" as
listed in performance standards #3. It was determined that this
statement included compaction of cans. cars. etc. and composting.
Thal questioned performance standard #2 which states 11 . . . main-
tain a dust free environment." Meyer suggested using .he words
"dust control" Instead of "dust free" which may be easier to
comply with.
The definition of publicly owned outdoor storage was reviewed.
The commission questioned the need for "fuel." will the City be
needing their own fuel tanks in the future? City Manager. Ed
Shukle commented that they recently studied the feasibility of
having their own fuel tanks versus buying fuel from SuperAmerica
and it was determined that it would be more cost effective to buy
from SuperAmerica, considering the liability involved with owning
a fuel storage tank. It was determined the word "fuel" would be
deleted from the definition.
4y?
The commission questioned if outdoor storage use should be avail-
able to all "local. county or state public agencies." It was
determined that Mound cannot even handle their own needs as it
• relates to outdoor storage, therefore It was determined that the
definition should be changed as follows:
Such facilities must be located on land owned by a - +e-
e°'i� n*tY i�utsHi�- agency the City of Mound.
All materials stored on -site must be owned or used by
sa4d- ageney the City of Mound.
The commission unanimously decided that the use should not be a
Permitted use. but should be a conditional use under Section
23.625.3.
The commission discussed the setback requirements. It was agreed
that the 50' setback requirement to residential prope.ty should
be enforced. however the 30' setback requlremert from abutting
commercial property was discussed. It was determined that these
setback requirements are essentially the same for any industrial
use, therefore it was the feeling of the commission that the City
should abide by the same requirements.
MOTION made by Mueller. seconded by Jensen to approve
the proposed zoning ordinance amended with the noted
changes as a draft document for public hearing purposes.
41 Motion carried unanimously.
This draft document will be reviewed by the City Council at their
meeting on January 23. 199'x. It was determined that a notice for
a public hearing will be published, and the public hearing date
at the planning commission level will be February 13. 1990.
•
4yf
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
October 23. 1989
a. Cons i derat i on of a Lon i_ g Moo i f i cat i on to a I I ow Storage f.
o
Publi W M - a t East and Wes sides of Citv
Hall_ PUBLIC,HEARING.
City Planner. Mark Koegler, reviewed the background of possibly
having outside storage for public works materials at the east and
west sides of city hall. He explained that there are two
separate tasks whicr, the Planning Commission needs to complete.
they are:
Issue Provide a recommendation to the City Council on the
possibility of establishing outdoor storage areas to the east and
west of the city hall building.
Issue__#2: Regardless of the Commission's recommendation on Issue
# above, provide a recommended zoning modification to accom-
modate the outdoor storage at the city hall site.
Koegler reviewed Issue #1 first. He stated that the proposed
city hall site will accommodate only a portion of the city's to-
tal requirement for outside storage. Therefore, if the city
hall site is implemented, additional storage sites will still be
needed. In addition, he explained other problems with the site,
such as: setback requirements which would eliminate one of the
five bays as planned, the significant amount of grading needed.
removal of all existing vegetation, environmental concerns relat-
ing to drainage. and the cost.
is
qso
. Planning Commission Minutes
October 23. 1989
Pane Two
Staff recommended that the Planninq Commission determine that the
sites located both east and west of the existing city shall are
unsuitable for storage of public works materials. Factors in-
fluencing this recommendation include the following:
1. The proposed use is inconsistent with city hall and the sur-
rounding wetland environment at Lost Lake due to the in-
ability of the sites to adequately handle on -site storm
drainage retention.
2. Both sites (and particularly the western site) are in-
herently unsuitable for the proposed use due to topography
and tree cover.
3. The cost of improvements to establish the two areas is not
.justifiable since three other sites including Lost Lake will
still be needed to accommodate public works storage.
The Commission had no comments, therefore Chair Meyer opened the
public hearing.
The following citizens spoke against having outside storage at
city hall= Don Jerdee, Dennis Stahlbusch, Marcia Jerdee, Fred
Hanley, Connie Hanley, Ben Marks. Some of the comments made by
these citizens were: there is not enough space anyway. it is not
feasible, the potential noise of the trucks next to residential
property, and the property is very beautiful with the trees now,
so why ruin it. It was noted that a majority of the citizens
present were against the proposed site. No one spoke in favor of
having the outside storage at city hall.
The Bickman site and Lost Lake site were reviewed as potential
storage sites. No one spoke in opposition to having the
materials stored at Lost Lake.
Chai leyer closed the public hearing.
MOTION made by Thal, seconded by Weiland, to recommend
to the City Council that the city hall site not be con-
sidered for the outdoor storage of public works
materials as the Planning Commission agrees with staff
recommendation. Motion carried unanimously.
Koenler reviewed his recommendation for Issue ##2. He explained
that city hall is currently zoned R -I. The only district
present l v a l l ow i na any type of outdoor storage is the 1-1. In-
dustrial district, which allows "storage of rock and stone
products" by conditior�31 use. to be consistent with the intent
of the overall zoning code, sr,3ff feels that the 8 -1 zone is the
potent i a l vehicle for accommod.it i na the proposed use.
45/
Planning Commission Minutes
October 23. 1989 •
Page Three
Staff recommended that the P l a n n i n g Commission f i nd that if the
City Council eventually finds that no other reasonable alterna-
tive to the city hall site exists for public works storage. the
B -1 zoning district should be modified to allow "publicly owned
materials storage areas" as a conditional use. Performance
standards should also be developed to minimize the impact on the
surrounding properties and the natural environment.
The Commission noted that the Lost Lake property is zoned B -I.
Koegler noted that the outside public storage use at the Lost
Lake site is currently a grandfathered use, however that use can-
not be intensified. It was also noted that the Bickman property
Is 8 -l.
The Commission discussed rezoning city hall to B -1. Marcia
Jerdee. Connie Stahlbusch, and Carol Hanley stated that they
would rather not have city hall rezoned to B -I until after the B-
zoning district is modified to allow outdoor storage of public
works materials.
The Commission asked for the City Planner's opinion on possibly
rezoning the city hall site to B -l. He suggested leaving city
hall zoned as R -1, the primary reason being the control of the
surrounding residents as they are aware of the uses allowed in a
residential district. If it is zoned B -1 and in the future
relocate city hall. the-f could sell the city hall building/
property to any business allowed within the B -1 district. which
could open up a host of uses.
Chair Meyer closed the public hearing.
The Commission determined that the current R -1 zoning for city
hall is sufficient, and that the B -I zoning district could be ex-
panded to allow open storage of public works materials as a con-
ditional use.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Weiland, to recommend
to the City Council that the city hall property not be
rezoned since the R -1 zoning district is sufficient and
desirable for its present use. In addition, the City
Council should look into expanding the 8 -1 zoning dis-
trict to allow outdoor storage of public works materials
as a conditional use with performance standards to be
drafted. Motion carried unanimously.
These issues will be addressed by the City Council at their meet-
ing on November 28, 1989. 0
9601,
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner
DATE: October 16, 1989
SUBJECT: Public Works Storage
APPLICANT: City of Mound
LOCATION: 5341 Maywood Road (East and West of City Hall)
VHS FILE NUMBER: 89- 310- A27 -ZO
EXISTING ZONING: Single Family Residential (R -1)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
BACKGROUND: For the past year, the City of Mound has been seeking
solutions to the problem of permanent storage of public works
materials. Public works materials consist of the items that are
required for normal year round maintenance activities such as sand,
salt, rock, seal coat aggregate, street sweepings, culverts and
other miscellaneous materials. At the present time, most of the
stored material sits on the Lost Lake site fronting on Shoreline
Boulevard. Additional storage occurs at the new public works
building and at the old Island Park facility.
As part of it's continuing effort to address this issue, the Mound
City Council has asked the Planning Commission to complete the
following two tasks:
1.. Provide a recommendation to the City Council on the
possibility of establishing outdoor storage areas to the
east and west of the city hall building.
2. Regardless of the Commission's recommendation in item it
above, provide a recommendej zoning modification to
accommodate the outdoor storage at the city hall site.
?he two issues identified above will be reviewed separately.
ISSUE !1
COMMENTS: The proposed storage on the city hall site will
accommodate only a portion of the l:ity's total requirement. R -,.3
:)Or Lane North Bldg 11, Suite 104 M,nreap01 9, MN 5544' -2175 6121553-1950
Planning Report
October 16, 1989 •
Page 2
Maintaining current operations practices, the city needs a minimum
of 2 acres for public works storage. If the city hall site is
implemented on both the east and west sides, additional storage
will still need to be provided at the new public works building,
Island Park and Lost Lake. If this proposal is implemented, the
city will have storage on 5 different parcels within the City of
Mound.
Storage to the east and west sides of city hall presents a variety
of problems and issues. The site on the east side will be enclosed
by retaining walls which due to existing grades, will be
approximately 8 feet tall at the northeast corner of the storage
area and close to 10 feet tall at the southeast corner of thetarea.
On the concept plan, these retaining walls are shown abutting the
property line. Since the walls are above ground structures
totalling more than 8 feet in height along Wilshire Boulevard, they
should comply with the front yard setback requirements of the
district (30'). Compliance with the setback requirements will
essentially eliminate one of the 5 bays in the storage area. Even
if the walls are not subject to the structural setback requirement,
they would need to observe a 30 foot setback in conformance with
Section 23.714 which states site distance requirements for
intersection areas.
The property immediately west of city hall slopes from southeast
to northwest and has a 26 foot differential in elevation from
property corner to property corner. The site contains heavy tree
cover composed primarily of maple and oak species. In order to
utilize the property for storage, three areas would be created with
access to the north and middle area off of an extension of Maywood
Road and access to the southern area from the existing city hall
parking lot. Creation of the storage area would require a
significant amount of grading and would require the total removal
of the existing vegetation.
Both the east and west sites pose two other significant issues:
environmental concerns and cost. The western site is adjacent to
the Lost Lake wetland area. Drainage from the eastern site reaches
Lost Lake via the existing storm sewer system. Storm water runoff
from the storage areas is an important consideration, a
consideration that is even more iR 'Nortant if any of the salt
mixture is ever stored on either of the proposed sites. The
storage concept plan for both the east and .est sides fully
utilizes the property. Since the sites are fully used, the plan
in its present configuration will not accommodate any on - site
retention ponds to intercept storm water prior to it's entering
either Lost Lake directly or the storm sewer system.
•
(?'5q
Planning Report
October 16, 1989
. Page 3
Cost is another consideration in reviewing the city hall storage
sites. Preliminary cot estimates by the City Engineer have
identified a total improvement cost of $330,000 to construct both
the east and west sites. This cost estimate includes approximately
$90,000 to upgrade Maywood Road.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
determine that the sites located both east and west of the existing
city hall are unsuitable for storage of public works materials.
Factors influencing this recommendation include the following:
1. The proposed use is inconsistent with city hall and the
surrounding wetland environment at Lost Lake due to the
inability of the sites to adequately handle on -site storm
drainage retention.
2. Both sites (and particularly the western site) are
inherently unsuitable for the proposed use due to
topography and tree cover.
3. The cost of improvements to establish the two areas is
not justifiable since three other sites including Lost
Lake will still be needed to accommodate public works
0 storage.
ISSUE i2
COMMENTS: Public works storage is a difficult issue to solve in
M ,jund due to the unavailability of suitable vacant land. Since
suitable vacant land does not exist, the process needs to sort out
the parcel or parcels which are the most suitable of the
unsuitable ", the lesser of evils so to speak. Despite the staff
recommendation on the use of the city hall sites and the eventual
Planning Commission recommendation on the proposed use, it is
conceivable that the final decision may be that the city hall sites
are, in fact, part of a package of public works storage areas. In
case that conclusion is reached, the Planning Commission needs to
provida the City Council with some direction on creating the zoning
vehicle to address this unique situation.
The city hall site is presently Zone R -1 which allows public
buildings by conditional use permit but does not allow outside
storage. In Mound, the only district presently allowing any type
of outdoor storage is the I -1, Industrial district which allows
"storage of rock and stone products" by conditional use permit.
Rezoning the existing city hall site to I -1 is inconsistent with
the best interests of the city and could be attacked as an example
of "spot zoning ". Any zoning modification of the city hall site
should bear some relationship to the surrounding zoning
classifications.
966
Planning Report
October 16, 1989
Page 4
Land in the vicinity of city hall is zoned either single family (R-
1), multi family (R -4) or Central Business commercial (B -1).
Accommodation of the public works storage could occur through
modification of any of these zones or the creation of a new zoning
category. In order to be consistent with the intent of the overall
zoning code, staff feels that the B -1 zone is the potential vehicle
for accommodating the proposed use.
The B -1 zoning district could be mod Pied to allow public buildings
and publicly owned materials storage areas by conditional use
permit. Such a change should also include the establishment of
performance standards for storage areas addressing landscaping and
screening, storm water runoff, setbacks, etc. It is also important
that the purpose accompanying such a zoning change clearly
establish that the use is required to protect public safety and
that no other reasonable alternatives exist either in Mound or in
adjacent communities.
•
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find
that if the City Council eventually finds that no other reasonable
alternative to the city hall site exists for public works storage,
the B -1 zoning district should be modified to allow "publicly owned
materials storage areas" as a conditional use. Performance
standards should also be developed to minimize the impact on the
surrounding properties and the natural environment.
•
as (P
Planning Commission Minutes
October 9. 1989
Page Four
DISCUSSION/INFORMATIONAL:
Discussion: Open Storage o f Publi Works Ma terials Pu blic Hea -
Ing Is being set for O 23rd). ^
The City Planner and Council Representative Jensen reviewed the
history of this issue. Koegler further reviewed questions which
the Planning Commission needs to address, they are:
1. Is open storage of public works materials appropriate, on
lands lying adjacent to the existing and expanded City Hall?
If not, does the Planning Commission have suggestions on an
alternative location?
2. if the Planning Commission finds that storage is appropriate
on the proposed site, what modifi tion to the zoning or-
dinance should be enacted to allow he storage to occur?
The Commission discussed possible storage at the east and west
sides of City Hall. The City Engineer informed the Commission of
the amount of storage needed, and the amount of storage space
that can be provided at City Hall. He concluded that even with
is storage on both sides of City Hall, storage space will still be
needed for seal coat, salt /sand mixture, and snow. The cost to
create storage space at City Hall compared to the cost to keep
the materials at the Lost Lake site was reviewed. The Commission
determined that their were three impracticalities to having
storage sites at City Hall: 1) cost of the project, 2) having
plies around a "new/ Improved" City Hall would not be appealing,
and 3) the number of trees that would be cut down.
The Commission discussed the advantages and disadvantages of
having the material stored at the Lost Lake site. The Commission
reached a consensus that the City Hall site is not an appealing
option, and that the Lost Lake site should be further examined.
A public hearing will be held pertaining to this issue at the
next Planning Commission meeting on October 23, 1989.
City Council Representative Report
Jensen reviewed the City Council Meeting of September 25, 1989
and the Committee of the Whole Meeting.
•
-!5�
•
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FRON: Mark Koegler, City Planner
DATE: October 2, 1989
SUBJECT: Open Storage of Public Works Materials
The City of Mound has been wrestling with the issue of storage of
public works materials for a number of years." - oval of the piles
of materials from the Lost Lake site has proven to be much easier
said than done. At the present time, the City Council is
considering the establishment of storage areas on either the east
or west sides of the city hall property. Either of these locations
presents a zoning problem which has been referred to the Planning
Commission by the City Council for further review and
consideration.
The attached letter dated September 25, 1989 summarizes the zoning
issues. The basic issue (or problem) is that the R -1 regulations
allow "local government buildings" by conditional use permit but
do not allow open storage areas. Therefore, present zoning
precludes the construction of the materials storage area. At the
last City Council meeting, this issue was referred to the Planning
Commission with the specific request that all findings be forwarded
to the City Council for their review on November 28, 1989.
The issue of open storage of public works materials will be the
subject of a Planning Commission public hearing on October 23,
1989. We would like to use the meeting of October 9, 1989 as A an
opportunity to introduce this issue and begin the review process
by the Planning Commission. Ultimately, the Planning Commission
will need to address the following questions:
1. Is open storage of public works materials appropriate on
lands lying adjaceit to the existing and expanded city
hall? If not, foes the Planning Commission have
suggestions on an alternative location?
2. If the Planning Iommission finds that storage is
appropriate on ttie proposed site, what modification to
the zoning ordinance should be enacted to allow the
storage to occur?
q5Y
3030 Harbor Lane North 11'dq U, SLIO . 104 1A s, MN 55447- 2175 612/553 -1350
MEMORANDUM
•
Planning Commission Memorandum
October 2. 1989
Page 2
Question number 2 which deals with zoning needs to be addressed by
the Planning Commission regardless of the Commission's
recommendation on question 1. The Planning Commission will need
to address the zoning issue in case the City Council concludes that
the city hall site is the only site in Mound capable of handling
the proposed storage.
Again, no decision or recommendation is being requested for the
upcoming meeting on October 9, 1989. Monday's meeting will be a
discussion session meant to introduce this complicated topic.
LJ
QSf
U
September 25, 1989
Mr. Ed Shukle, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Dear Ed:
In a recent conversation, you asked me to address the process for
approving an open storage area on the east and west sides of the
city hall building. The city hall site is presently zoned Single
Family Residential (R -1). In that zone, "local government
buildings" is a category in the listing of conditional uses. The
ordinance does not contain a definition of "local government
buildings ". Therefore, in order to process a conditional use
permit for the city hall expansion including an outside materials
storage area, the City Council would have to find that the proposed
use is a "local government building ".
The only precedent that can even be remotely related to this issue
is the approval in April of 1988 of the new public works building.
In that case, "public buildings" was identified as a permitted use.
Public buildings, a term also not defined, was interpreted in the
case of the public works building to include a small materials
storage area.
If the City Council determines that open materials storage areas
are part of "local government buildings ", the city will need to
process the facility as a conditional use permit. Since the permit
will involve a site zoned for residential purposes and the use
(open storage) is normally associated with industrial operations,
the city will need to rigorously apply the standards in the
ordinance pertaining to the criteria for approving conditional use
permits (Section 23.505.1). Major issues in the review are likely
to be concerned with the compatibility of the proposed use with the
surrounding residential properties and environmental issues
associated with the long term storage of salts and other materials
adjacent to Lost Lake.
Very truly yours,
VAN OOREN- HAZARD- STALLINGS, INC.
by: i s
R. Mark Koegler
City Planner
q(00 3030 Harbor Lan# Norm Blaq.0 Su ae 104 Minneapolis, MN 55447 -2175 612/553 -1950
�
0
It'
—
. —
�E Ca E U E)�
/
/ ` \
| \
' \
\ `
PRELIMINARY
|
---
� mpooM �
MATERIAL STORA&E-
\
`
.. M M
.8. 'JY� � �•�. w � ��� X11 11
•'t�3o• r. .;
VI�,� 1 �+
-?'�h 1 911 ;��' I♦ / 1 �O � � � •b..
b s S \ 1 t 1.
��� t ill ✓U3
10 ' ( -
EDEN
r Y
CL.
u: t ss► t
W a, = 1
(62) U Ito It A► � .. ]I �• t1•
.I •
'te• esr
y) �•, s I
;0 N 7
66 n j• so IQ = 7 t+
1
5 - 3 1 43 1'
'8 F
PART OF FAAI OF
LOT ]. (Qi a 13 1, 1 ... .... N PAMIll
9 (� \
1
l0i 1 ,p
.. ti � "1 6 tAV 56 (A - C' �n'.6 2`. Its bi \ 11 7
p to
let. 6
( p ..* . -\ I % \ - Q! I — ..........
� ► � , �0y1 t DATA
P (19) 4 e'+, g 7 136) �. �. .\ D,
SA
I J
SZ
� - - - - J
J la •t A
A = � i
is �' n'..:+ :
:. '� ' r
(5)) �
-,�:
--- ..- - - -..1 (
' � _
P I -
�1 ±^ -
( 1�) o
o '
9 7
_ - P
10 I
t �
'" ]1 u
10 ' ( -
EDEN
r Y
CL.
u: t ss► t
W a, = 1
(62) U Ito It A► � .. ]I �• t1•
.I •
'te• esr
y) �•, s I
;0 N 7
66 n j• so IQ = 7 t+
1
5 - 3 1 43 1'
'8 F
PART OF FAAI OF
LOT ]. (Qi a 13 1, 1 ... .... N PAMIll
9 (� \
1
l0i 1 ,p
.. ti � "1 6 tAV 56 (A - C' �n'.6 2`. Its bi \ 11 7
p to
let. 6
( p ..* . -\ I % \ - Q! I — ..........
� ► � , �0y1 t DATA
P (19) 4 e'+, g 7 136) �. �. .\ D,
SA
I J
SZ
George R. Ramier
John R. Gnes
Patrick Murray
David J. Lenhardt
Ramier Gries, Murray and Lenhardt
Professional Association. Attorney : at Law
April 4, 1990
Gregory J. Van Heest 0
100 East Central
P.O. Box 35
St. Michael, Minnesota 55376
Telephone: (612) 497 -3099
Honorable Mayor Steven Smith and UD APR 5 1990
Mound City Council Members
Mound City Hall
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Re: Paul Nesenson - Variance Request
Case No. 90 -909 VHS File No. 90- 310 -89 -ZO
Location: 2197 Cardinal Lane
Dear Mayor Smith and City Council Members:
Please be advised that I represent Paul Nesenson who
recently purchased the above - referenced property. His intention
when purchasing this property was to repair the existing
structure located on the lot, to create a modern dwelling for his
brother -in -law to purchase. Prior to entering into the
transaction, Mr. Nesenson had an architect, an engineer and a
building official from another area all look at the property.
His intent was to determine whether or not this structure could
be repaired on a cost effective basis such that a good,
affordable house would be the end result. He was advised by the
engineer, architect and building official that his intentions
were reasonable, and that his numbers were workable.
Mr. Nesenson then talked to your building official, Jan
Bertrand and told her of his plans. He mentioned the specific
property he was going to purchase. Her first response to Mr.
Nesenson was that he should "sharpen his pencil" to be sure that
his numbers would work and that the transaction would be
worthwhile to him. As stated above, he had already done that.
She alas stated that she was "well aware" of this particular
property, tha implication being that there might be something
wrong with it that Mr. Nesenson was unaware of. He asked her if
there was any implication in her statement and she simply said
no, just that she was well aware of the property. It seems to my
client, reasonably so I might add, that if there were city
ordinances that Jan Bertrand felt would prohibit the repair of
this property, that would have been the time to advise Mr.
4(v4
402 Park National Bank Budding 5351 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis. Minnesota 55416 (612) 542 -1000
Ramier, Gries, Murray and Lenhardt City of Mound
Professional Assoaadon Attorneys at law April 4, 1990
Page 2
Nesenson of that fact. However, she said nothing.
My client purchased the property. He was then advised by
Bertrand that he needed a variance because the property was
nonconforming. Apparently, the nonconformance is that the
structure D.es 2.7 feet into the required front yard set back.
The structure conforms to side and rear set backs and meets all
zoning requirements.
Mr. Nesenson submitted a list of intended repairs to the
City in his variance application. His application, together with
supporting documentation of the remodeling changes that he
proposed, were all provided and commented upon by Bertrand and
Mark Roegler, your City Planner in a Planning Report to the
Planning Commission and staff dated March 21, 1990.
The matter was heard before the City Planning Commission and
pursuant to staff recommendations, was denied. The
recommendation for denial as set forth in Roegler's Planning
Report dated March 21, 1990 does not, in my opinion, adequately
state a reasonable basis for the denial.
The City's position appears to be that because the house
needs structural repairs, it violates Ordinance No. 23.404(7).
The City also takes the position that, from the City's
perspective, necessary repairs will add up to more than 50% of
the fair market value of the property, in violation of Ordinance
No. 23.404(2).
My client disputes the City's position from a technical
point of view as well as from a simple common sense point of view
which will be expanded on below. First, Ordinance No. 23.404(2)
allows necessary repairs that are less than 50% of the fair
market value. Nothing in this ordinance provision prohibits
structural repairs. The only threshold requirement set forth in
this ordinance provision is that the "necessary repairs" (be they
structural and nonstructural) be not more than 50% of the fair
market value of the property. Although this provision appears to
contradict your ordinance provision No. 23.404(7) (which appears
to prohibit structural repairs), it is our opinion that 23.404(2)
is the primary clause of this ordinance and that it overrides the
rest of the provisions of this ordinance. Therefore, the issue
then becomes, which of the remodeling items proposed by Mr.
Nesenson are "necessary"? Only the "necessary" items should be
calculated when trying to determine whether those repairs will
Q (05
Ramier, Gries, Murray and Lenhardt City of hound
ftfessional Association Attorneys at Law April 4 t 1990
Page 3
constitute more than 508 of the market value of the structure.
It is our position that much of the remodeling Mr. Nesenson
proposed are simply items that will improve the structure, make
it more modern and more livable but are certainly not 'necessary'
in order to bring the structure up to code. More to the point,
many of the items proposed by Mr. Nesenson comply with the spirit
of Section 23.404(8) which allows alterations to be made to
improve the livability of a residential unit.
My client has a bid of not more than $9,300.00 for any
structural repairs that need to be made. Of the other items
proposed for remodeling, only the insulation, and some
electrical, heating and plumbing work could be considered work
necessary for code compliance. (However, I would interject here
that nothing in your ordinance specifically equates code
compliance with the safe /unsafe reference in 23.404(2)). The
balance of the proposed remodeling zhanges submitted by Mr.
Nesenson in his variance application are simply items that would
improve the structure, make it more modern and more livable, and
one would assume, more desirable from everybody's point of view,
including the City of Mound.
Although Mr. Nesenson proposed to rewire the entire house,
put in an entire new heating system and also install an entire
new plumbing system, not all of that work is necessary in order
to make the house safe. Only code related receptacles need to be
completed for the electrical work and I believe the plumbing
repairs that are "necessary" are largely limited to better
venting. All of that could be done, together with the structural
repairs, for less than $16,000.00, which means it would be less
than 508 of the fair market value of the property. However, my
client is a prudent individual and it would only be more prudent
to completely modernize the systems at this time rather than
limit the repairs to only items absolutely 'necessary" to comply
with code. Similarly, although rat "necessary" it is only
prudent to modernize the cabinets, repair siding and other items
as set forth in his proposal, so as to construct a nice,
affordable sirgle family dwelling unit.
Mr. Nesenson feels that Jan Bertrand's memo to the Planning
Commission was not entirely accurate. The fair market value of
the structure is $32,000.00. Also, my client did not gut the
entire second floor. Much of that floor contained walls that did
not have sheetrock and other wall coverings. Mr. Nesenson did
remove some of the wall coverings that sere present so as to
•
•
Ramier, Gries, Murray and Lenhardt City of Mound
Professional Association Attomeys at taw April 4, 1990
Page 4
•
allow his engineer to have a better view of the structure of the
house so as to be best advised as to what repairs and remodeling
would be needed.
Bertrand indicates that facia boards are missing. However,
what should have been pointed out is that the house was built
with no facia boards in the first place. The roofing has been
patched, that is true, but it is not in poor condition according
to my client's advisors. Only one wall has been pushed outward
approximately six inches contrary to the implication in
Bertrand's memorandum. That would be fixed as part of my
client's proposal. In reference to the windows at the second
floor being within 18 inches of the floor is misleading is that
only windows that are more than nine square feet need to meet
that requirement. The basement that is referred to is really
nothing more than a large walk /crawl space with an It is also
entrance. It is not a basement in the typical sense.
not true that the plumbing in the building needs to be totally
removed. As referred to above, there are only certain venting
and distribution improvements that need to be made. The furnace
unit is only 14 years old.
Finally, and maybe most importantly, Mr. Nesenson's estimate
of all the remodeling repairs he intended to make was $27,500.00
not $50,000.00 as referred to in Bertrand's memorandum. Mr.
Nesenson's reference to the $50,000.00 when talking with Bertrand
was simply that he was buying this property, going to spend
approximately $27,000.00 to improve it, and thet his
brother -in -law would be able to afford a $50,000.00 mortgage (to
cover the lot price and the improvements) so as to purchase it
from my client and end up with a house that his brother -in -law
and his family could afford to own.
As stated above, the actual "necessary' repairs and
remodeling will amount r:o a sum that is less than $16,010.00.
The balance of Nesenson's $27,500.00 remodeling expenditures will
be to improve the livability and the over all appearance of the
property. My client felt that that would be desirable from the
City's perspective and yet it now seems that his proposal is
being used against him. Neighbors in the area would like to see
my client 'be allowed to repair that p perty. I am enclosing a
copy of letters from two neighbors on either side of this
property to that effect.
Finally, in addition to the arguments and objections that we
q47
Ranvier, Gries, Murray and Lenhardt
Professional Anwation Attomeys at Law
raise above, it appears to my client that the City is losing the
overall perspective on this matter. The only nonconformity of
this property is that the structure lies a mere 2.7 feet closer
to the street than your current front yard set back requirement
allows. However, it appears that the house next door to this one
is also similarly aligned. The third house into the street
appears to actually be in compliance with your current ordinance,
yet the next two houses seem to again be similarly aligned with
this house. It is not as though my client is trying to remodel
and preserve a residential house located in a commercial zone or
trying to keep a commercial property operating in a residential
zone. Mound's strict adherence to an ordinance restricting
maintenance and repair of nonconforming properties does not seem
reasonable given the circumstances of this case. All he is
trying to do is improve and repair a residential house in a
residential neighborhood that is aligned in its front yard set
back with the majority of the other properties on that city
block.
It is Mr. Nesenson's hope that the City Council will take a
new look at this situation. At the City Planning Commission
meeting, at least one of the planning commission members appeared
to give no consideration to the matter at all and stated on two
occasions, that 'if staff wants the house torn down, then tear it
down.' Hopefully, the City Council will take a more considered
look at this issue. In view of the somewhat vague nature of Lhe
current ordinance, and the facts as set forth above in this
letter, it appears to Mr. Nesenson that the City Planning
Commission's decision was arbitrary at best.
If the City of Mound is going to demand that this structure
be torn down, then my client will demand that the City commence
Eminent Domain proceedings or purchase the property from him.
His preference, however, is simply to be allowed to remodel and
improve what has been an eyesore for the neighborhood and for the
City. Please do not lose sight of the fact that this property
has been lived in as recently as a few months ago. Apparently,
the City had not been taking any action until just recently in
regard to the deteriorated conditi," this property.
Thank you for your attentOn to Ois matter.
Very tfuly pjkrs�,
DJL /cmk
Enclosures
q 4 cc: tr Pearson
J.
•
•
•
L -J
C
' f
f �
i
�-s ti � wnFv` ci{ L ois i; /
8 /uc
✓70 Y /�Pjarir c?4CJ
I festo�a tio/7 0`� f/►e �.2,f�F -.� �, 0�7 L
/S q, /6 . C/ny
Gvo� /o/ E'r wc• /co.»� GS
f�
- On) tSV.,Ioo r
�GrnE'O /1Q h =t5 ix e,
re-4 0
i
c
✓�fablF �ir R /..
i
iii : r -� t'/ ,• -
•
I
9 ( ' 09
-
1,9,90 Auk
..rho -�" �- � �o�Z� = � • /
8070
•
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
March 26, 1990
e. Case No. 90-909t Paul Nesenson, 2197 Cardinal Lane, Lot
Ii- 16, Block 8, Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lakeside Park,
PID 813 - 117 -24 -34 0012. VARIANCE.
City Planner, Mark Koegler. reviewed the applicants request to do
structural. repairs to a nonconforming dwelling. The existing
structure encroaches approximately 2.7 feet Into the required
front yard setback. Koegler explained that there was a fire to
the dwelling, however, staff has determined that the fire damage
did not exceed 50 percent of the fair market value. $32,200; and
therefore, is not an issue.
Koegler referred to zoning code section 23.404 relating to non-
conforming uses. He concluded that this application does not
meet the requirements outlined in items (2) and (7). Major
structural Improvements are necessary to repair this structure,
and the cost of the structural improvements alone, according to
estimates by the Building Official, will exceed 50% of the fair
market value of the structure. The City Planner recommended
denial of the request.
Koegler added, that if the Planning Commission and City Council
concur with this recommendation, the Building Official will In-
itiate actions to see that the building is removed.
The commission determined that there are no other non -
conformities to the structure or lot other than the encroachment
Into the front yard setback.
A majority of the commission members commented that in most cases
It has been proven to be more cost effective to remove the struc-
ture and rebuild rather than repair the existing.
0
97/
0
Mueller referred to section 23.404 (8) which states, "Alterations
may be made to a bullding containing lawful non - conforming
residential units when they will improve the IIvabiIIty thereof,
provided they will not Increase the number of dwelling units or
bulk of the bullding, with the recommendation and approval of the
City Council." He believes that this item applies to this
request; and the applicant should be allowed to repair the build-
ing.
Applicant, Paul Nesenson, spoke on his behalf. He referred to
page nine of the packet which lists the repairs he Intends to
complete. He stated that the estimated cost of these repairs
will be $27,500. The commission had a difficult time agreeing
with Mr. Nesenson on the estimated cost. Mr. Nesenson passed out
pictures for the commission to review.
Jensen clarified to the commission that Item (2) of section
23.404 states, ". . . the necessary repairs shall not constitute
more than 50% of the fair market value of such structure."
Therefore, $27,500 exceeds 50% of the market value which is
$32,200,x 50% _ $16,100.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Voss to deny the
variance request per the City Planner's recommerdstlon
which states that this request does not meet the
requirements of Zoning Code Section 23.404 (2) and (7). •
Mr. Nesenson commented that if the City does not allow people to
make repairs to their structures and require that they remove
them instead, people won't ask the City's permission to do
repairs, Instead they will do repairs without the proper permits.
Mueller agreed.
Michael commented that the b u i l d i n g has been deemed unsafe, and
both the City Planner and the Building Official have recommended
that the building be removed.
Motion for denial carried seven to two (those In favor
were: Clapsaddle, Weiland, Thal, Jensen, Voss, Smith,
and Michael; those opposed were: Mueller and Meyer).
This case will be heard by the City Council on April 10, 1990.
•
9 7*1--.
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Mark Koegl er, City Planner
DATE: March 21, 1990
SUBJECT: Variance Request
APPLICANT: Paul Nesenson
CASE NUMBER: 90 -909
VHS FILE NUMBER: 90- 310 -A9 -ZO
LOCATION: 2197 Cardinal Lane
EXISTING ZONING: Two - Family Residential (R -3)
• COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential - Duplex
BACKGROUND: The applicant is seeking a variance to upgrade a
single - family structure damaged by a recent fire. The existing
structure encroaches approximately 2.7 feet into the required front
yard setback therby making it a non - conforming structure. The
structure currently conforms to the required side and rear yard
setbacks.
The Mound Zoning Code contains provisions covering non - conforming
structures including those damaged by fire. Section 23.404 (4) of
the Code states, "Whenever a lawful non - conforming structure shall
have been damaged by fire, flood, explosion, earthquake, war, riot
or act of God, it may be reconstructed and used as before if it be
reconstructed within twelve (12) months after such calamity, unless
the damage to the building or structure is 50 percent or more of
its fair market value as shown on the ds:essor's records at the
time of damage in which case the wnole thereof shall ce demolished
and any construction thereafter shall be for a use in accordance
with the provisions of this Ordinance."
The non- conforminy provisions of this section of the Code impose
two tests. First, it requires that reconstruction occur within 12
months of the damage. In this case, the fire occurred on March 3,
• 1990 so it edsilf satisfies the 12 month requirement.
3030 Harbor Lerse N ; 11 �, 'oa MIVr . ,, MN 5-44 2,', h+. .3 19
Planning Report
March 21, 1990
Page 3
The second test relates to the extent of damage. In all cases, the
damage caused by a fire can not exceed 50 percent of the fair
market value as shown on the assessor's records. According tc° the
assessors records, the structure was valued at $32,200 at the time
of the fire. The fire damage was contained to the southeast room
of the structure. The exact extent of the fire damage is difficult
to quantify because the applicant completed a significant amount
of demolition without a building permit so no actual record is
available. Based on the Building Official's observations and
conversations with the owner, staff is comfortable that the damage
did not exceed the 50% threshold ($16,100) imposed by the
ordinance. Therefore, the structure satisfies the requirements
imposed by Section 23.404 (4) of the Mound Zoning Code.
Section 23.404 of the Code contains other provisions applicable to
this case. Item (7) states that normal maintenance of non-
conforming structures can occur "including necessary non - structural
repairs and incidental alterations which do not exten d or inten
the non - conforming use." Item (2) states, "nothing in this Chapter
shall prevent restoring of a structure to safe condition when said
structure is declared unsafe by the City, providing further that
the necessary repairs shall not constitute more than 50% of the
fair market value of such structure."
The applicant submitted a general list of proposed improvements.
Additionally, attached to this report is a copy of the Building
Official's observations nosed on an inspection of the property.
Because of the nature and extent of the proposed improvements, this
structure does not comply with either of the code sections
referenced above. Major structural improvements are necessary in
violation of 23.404 (7). The cost of the structural improvements
alone according to estimates by the Building Official will exceed
100% of the fair market value of the structure. Therefore, this
request does not meet the requirements of 23.404 (2).
RECOMMENDATION: Section 23.404 of the Mound Code of Ordinances
specifically promotes the removal of non - conforming structures when
they are unable to satisfy s tat !d thresholds. Based on the
extensive improvements necessary to make the residence at 2197
Cardinal Lane habitable and structurally sound, and the effort
necessary .o bring the building up to Code, this request clearly
does not meet the requirements outlined in Section 23.404, items
(2) and (7). Therefore, staff recommends Oenldl of the requested
variance.
If the Planning Commission
recommendation, the Building
that the building is removed.
and City Council concur with this
Official will initiate actions to sep
•
is
•
lq741
23.404 Non - Conforming Uses
(i) Any structure or use lawfully existing upon the effective date of this
• Chapter may be continued at the size and in a manner of operation
existing upon such date.
--+(2) Nothing in this Chapter shall prevent restoring of a structure to safe
condition when said structure is declared unsafe by the City, providin
further that the necessary repairs shall not constitute more than 50%
of the fair market value of such structure.
Appendix B
(3)
When any lawful non- conforming use of any structure or land in any
district has been changed to a conforming use, it shall not thereafter
be changed to any non - conforming use.
(4)
Whenever a lawful non- conforming structure shall have been damaged by
fire, flood, explosion, earthquake, war, riot, or act of God, it may
be reconstructed and used as before if it be reconstructed within
twelve (12) eionths after such calamity, unless the damage to the buildin
or structure is SO percent or more of its fair market value as shown on
the assessor's records at the time of damage in which case the whole
thereof shall be demolished and any construction thereafter shall be for
•
a use in with the provisions of this Ordinance.
(5)
Whenever a lawful non- conforming use of a structure or land is discon-
tinued for a period of twelve (12) months, any future use of said
structure or land shall be in conformity with the provisions of this
Chapter.
(6)
A lawful non - conforming use of a structure or parcel of land may be.
changed to a sTmilar non - conforming use or to a more restrictive non-
conforming use. Some non - conforming uses are permitted by sonditionai
use permits. Once a structure or parcel of land has been placed in a
more restrictive non- conforming use, it shall not return to a less
restrictive non- conforming use. •
--4(7)
Normal maintenance of a building or other structure containing or relate
to a lawful non - conforming use is permitted, including necessary non -
structural repairs and incidental alterations which do not extend or
intensify the non - conforming use.
(8) Alterations may be made to a building containing lawful non - conforming
residential units when they will improve the livability thereof, pro-
vided they will not increase the numbs of dwelling units or bulk of
the building, with the recommendation and approval of the City Council.
0
A7i!r
'FIN I NI(A'\I
TO: Planning Commission, City Council, Applicant, and Staff
FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official
DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of March 26, 1990
CASE NO.: 90 -909
LOCATION: 2197 Cardinal Lane
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 15 b 16, Block 8, Abraham Lincoln Addition to
Lakeside Park, PID M-117-24-34 0012
SUBJECT: Variance to Allow Structural Modifications /Repairs
EXISTING ZONING: R -3 Two Family Residential
Attached, please find a letter to the taxpayer of record for 2197 Cardinal
Lane. Paul Nesenson is the new owner of this property and was hand delivered .
this letter on March 14, 1990. He was in my office to apply for a variance
to do structural modifications to to-'s home. This structure was built in 1913
and I have attached a copy of the Hennepin County Appraiser's Report which
indicates a value of the structure at $30,900 for the 1989 tax year.
I visited the site with the Fire Marshal on March 6, 1990 after a small fire
had been extinguished on March 3, 1990. I found that the building had been
gutted on the second floor without obtaining the required demolition permits
prior to removal of materials. The first and second floor framing consists
of 2'x6's, 16" o.c. with some at 3' o.c. The walls and rafters are 2'x4's,
16" o.c. ( + / -). The 4" lap siding is cracked and chipped. Fascia boards are
missing and some are rotted. The roofing has been patched and is in poor condition.
The walls and floors are not plumb with the second floor, the walls are pushed
outward approximately 6 ". 'the rafters and walls were not tied together over
the many years of its existence. There are inadequate beam supports for the
second and first floor system. The front screen porch has sloped floors, no
stairway, and rotted boards at the rir Joist area. The windows are in poor
condition with the side pulls missing,, putty missing, some rotted areas, and
paint peeling. h'indows at the second flc,, are within 18 inches of the floor
walking; surface, current codes w� .11 require safety glass. There should he
abatement of lv,id hose paint in tlii�; elder structure.
The 1) ii:,e ^lent /re11,Ir I 3 A � -ewt 1 ii`v 1c :3 , iii tht , ,ildinr rib , e the :I(wr l ine
which ne(e tAt 111 11 TT! i; it t t t. r mice, e Ilo�_�r
iti flirt find L .tl( etc tlir ,. iil k', tltift ,arc C�'.'e' �rtIwi
spay e.
470
Page 2
March 26, 1990
• The plumbing in the building needs to be tot...ly removed to comply with current
code as there is an improper venting system and water distribution lines. The
existing forced air furnace does not have a duct distribution supply system
nor return system to all of the rooms within the building. The furnace unit
appears to be in poor condition. The electrical service is 60 amp with most
of the wiring pulled out of the walls and hanging in place ' r future hook
up at the second floor. The first floor has inadequate outlets, light fixtures,
and C. .suits with no grounding to recepticles.
Mr. Nesenson is proposing to plumb and straighten the entire structure of this
building, and remodel all of the mechanical systems to current code as well
as replace a Food share of the interior and exterior fini.shings of the building.
He has told me that he estimates he will put approximately $50,000 of repair
to the structure. It is my opinion thrt he building should be razed and removed
from the property. However, if the planning commission and council feel that
it is justified, in that neighborhood, to extensively repair this building,
I feel the contractor should supply the city with a performance bond in the
amount of 1257 of the repairs to assure completion of his project.
As per Exhibit A, you will note that due to the topography and shape of this
lot it may be necessary to consider a variance to place a new structure on
this property.
. JB: pj
cc: City Planner, Mark Koegler
City Manager, Ed Shukle
Applicant, Paul Nesenson
•
A7*?
CITY OF MOUND
R � 3Z4� s
l
_.
PART II Case No.
Date Filed n - l-k- 90 _
Fee s50.00
VARIANCE APPLICATION
PLANNING s ZONING COMMISSION
(Please type or print the following information.)
Address of SubJect Property 2197 Cardianl Lane
Lot 15 6 16 Block * 8
Addition Abraham Lincoln P I D No. 13- (I -24 -34- 0012
Owner's Name Paul Nesenson Day Phone ( 612 ) 479 -3221
Owner's Address 3895 Independence Rd., Maple Plain, MN 55359
Applicant's Name (if other than owner).
Address
Day Phone
Existing Use of Property: Residence
NW
Zoning District R - 3
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use
permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ?gf3Qii / no . If yes,
list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolution number(s)
(Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.)
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in
any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac-
curate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this
application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose
of inspecting, or of posti maintaining and removing such notices as may
be required by law.
Applicant's S i gnaturq— • _ �✓� Date_ 'lla r c! i 1 4, 1990
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
Flannino Commission Recommendation__
Date_
Counc 1 1 Act i on:
Resolution No. Date
k'Oe 1 3 -0`1
G7i
O ARIANCE APPLICATION
Case No. q 1 '
I. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for
the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (X), No ( ). If not
specify each non - conforming use:_
2. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and
setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located?
Yes ( ), No OV. If no, specify each non - conforming use:,
existing set back, front lot lines
3. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent
its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning
district?
( ) too narrow (X ) topography ( ) soil
( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) sub - surface
( ) too shallow ( X ) shape ( x) other: specify
1 story garage site
4.
5.
•
Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone
having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was
adopted? Yes ( ), No (X). If yes, explain
Was the hardship created by any other man -made change, such as the
relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No ():). If yes, explain
Mi
VARIANCE APPLICATION Case No, go _g VQ 0
6. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance
peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (X),
No ( ). If no, how many other properties are similarly affected?
7. What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area, bulk, and
setback regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of
your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and writ-
ten explanation. _
see explanation sheet and drawings
8. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in
the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance?
No 0
PART III
J. SITE PLAN INFORMATION: All supporting documents such as sketch glans,
attachments, etc., must be submitted in 8 -1/2 "x11" size. If larger
drawings are submitted, one must be 8 -1/2 "x11 ", and 15 larger size
copies must be pro For each requested znning variance procedure,
a site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity show-
ing the following information:
1. Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed: (Lot(s),
building(s), driveways) /street access, off - street parking, and
utilities.
2. Existing and proposed elevations.
3. Distance between: building and front, side and rear lot lines;
principal building and accessory buildings; principal building
and principal buildings on adjacent lots.
4. Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc.
5. Indicate "north" compass direction.
6 . Any a d d i t i o n a l i nforrn.3t i on as may reasonao 1 y be requ i red by , th�
city staff and applicable section of the Zoning Ordinance.
V �
0
7
•
•
C)"�� ec I tL C -ED:! the .3r C I_ *k 1p 'j
If Itac 've ia i n c- . x
')C' t E S S Fk3 dIF) Ir IU ',. e I i r' a -, a, L
this houc:c- it will IL- itself for the -e. vylicr! rias
v,ell maintained cICE Irxisim.c.
f scone i! 1 e t ' 4 n c
Na�, 1 al I e * ,Ions as lo✓ :rx-
a t t ac r led
Inc_ , --c te? 3' 1 LN61 - ,aVp
�tr i mod
r,ew & I r--c T r i cl a: v 1 t I ro code.
o,Se tc
Reu l ac L... e
a
'-C r fc? I r DC-7 at
4 P/
q 0 -Cicci
0
N c-) t e r I C' C' I C
1 vpmon t T r + I u I flO 3c,:,
aster the .:. r 3a !-, e e r C C. z L-
;
SUmf-atior " I S '. :Ill. 31 3(_;E3 ; -C jt "7 - 3F C=
� E. . D u t t; t. t t F: - .
, a - =:v.
4z ..,p u o vi -cam- --
11
0
•
•
z
H
1
0
Z
i72
i
Z
it ,
V
t
d
N69 ° 16'30" " -'"'
13.75 meat
13.82 plot
A
�j
E.islinq
.0
`
.
I I
I
l�
i l
tDT AREA - 6707& Kh.
N.
1 '
r l
00
J
p op
\.
Scale 1 inch = 3U `eet
•
0 (set Date 1 rc) ma rkers
) Iron a�a
(found)
Datum N G.V.D. B "`
fMr, • frI •�
(fu••) S PL, I e I e V'i on
i L` k; V l i j%
Lots 15 a-ld 16, 01 N, W;gAu1M
LINCULN ADDITIUN TU LAKE.IoE PARK,
MOUND,MINNETONKA •'
I hereby certify thdL ,urvey
wds prepared by me u• c:. -,y
supervision and th luiy
Registered Land Survcyrr ; -Ier the
Iews 0f the State of Piro c,u1A,
COFFIN b GkUNBEkG
Murk 5. Gronberg Mn t �u, 171`5
Engi eers, Land S �..i Planer.
i�'�'I idler•, Ml nne
W
Z
d
E.islinq
I I
I
l�
i l
M 64
..j
N 89 58'30" w
65.00
84.84
L�iplal
meat.
0
0
Q
nl tut is
\
k
33 {{ 5
ryJ *��
S
g, 604 -5
n
E&ittlnq
C
r iTi — 1 N
MOUtf
'
O
40
3'/►Alo�4s
12 0
1 a L
I
o
1 I
tDT AREA - 6707& Kh.
N.
1 '
r l
00
J
p op
\.
Scale 1 inch = 3U `eet
•
0 (set Date 1 rc) ma rkers
) Iron a�a
(found)
Datum N G.V.D. B "`
fMr, • frI •�
(fu••) S PL, I e I e V'i on
i L` k; V l i j%
Lots 15 a-ld 16, 01 N, W;gAu1M
LINCULN ADDITIUN TU LAKE.IoE PARK,
MOUND,MINNETONKA •'
I hereby certify thdL ,urvey
wds prepared by me u• c:. -,y
supervision and th luiy
Registered Land Survcyrr ; -Ier the
Iews 0f the State of Piro c,u1A,
COFFIN b GkUNBEkG
Murk 5. Gronberg Mn t �u, 171`5
Engi eers, Land S �..i Planer.
i�'�'I idler•, Ml nne
MCSS
Midwest Cedar Shake Supply, Inc.
6000 Highway 12
Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359
(612) 479.3221
s'
s
I
i W,
' I
�.1
1
j
7 __
JOB - - _
$MEET NO _
CALCULATED By
DATE_._, -_ - -__
CHECKED By
_-
SCALE 41
,DATE
j / (ny
I
P
l �f
11
1.
.� 3 N
TRANSMITTAL
0 30 1 C hms Lane Suite
410, Minneap, lis, Minnesota 55435 1612)830.0070
— ��, 5 - RE: _ Y
Job No. - &9-2 Date 3 2,
T0: _ _Qom herewith
•---- -• _ We are sending under separate cover ____ topics of:
—- '— • -___�_ Originals C Photographs
Print$ 2 SpCCifiCations
ED Sepias
C Samples
Z Shop Drawings _
OESC IIPTION: 1 r1 ?AA� Q -
The a )ove copies are: No exceptions taken C Note markings
® It sheets = Rejected Contractor confirm
For your use P gecubmit
REMR RKS. --___ Copies unmarked As requested
Copies cf the IS nop DraWln is ire bFri119 sent to.
.a ') y...;ta�
I
F _- �+ J Q
p t l k
!� All
x
�
�o
• F� k✓ a L_I n K
gft=N
Q8 �,
C�
0
>= �UN9A7 10l 3
•
O `
• C w o.e...
N;
AAA i
c
r
!c' u r7
M1.
:P
0
v
A 4
`,
0
f
I� �
�-- q
N I N � IC N I 1YP
do
.�_._. --... fi TA .
x1
N� "� i i" � •�
soip
zx� e t
( (I e I
. G t' U
ev
Z—
f gAM I
Nib
•
•
f
o;
a�
/ I y
i AA
I _
I
isk
91 /
CALCULAT90 1y- DATE
T %A rolossional 0o Ila Group CMCCKO OV,..... DOE
Aew2 — - —
I
..., ._T... ` _,_.r., .. �. « * .. ...,. ., .? .....,.,. . .... . {. _..I. ,....E ---�..
1 4
l 0000l
i
1;
.�.. ,. _. . +. Ao
i TI,
TIM
TA L... A
IJ Y j�
1
iz-
MOMMISLAMIL
bP4 it I roffulanal Dal on 2►0up
Joe-
GMUT No
CKICK10 IV DATE
1
•4 1
:7 A-
4 '.
/* 1 00
r te. L•... 1 j... �.,.,.� ..A.. '. '. .,.� t• .. I ..! ..
00
-4-4
I
Ow l
JOO
A
71
.... ..,. ..�.....' ...: ' -fir'"" .FT -. .,.. }. .��.., �._,..,.. .'`�., ,�,,, ,� . ! ...i........_�._.t...•.
I .
7
CA�CC��TiC Sr ,.`.,.
_ .._..�,
TV%MA •oiouionol Os: In group CNECKeu ev
ecue
r I -
,
' I
I ..
�., ....... .. ., ,. J�JyJI
I
i p p:
e oloo l
i
_ A r , ,
1
_ , .. ,. ..� te r!. , . _. .. _ •
31
C D- •
- - -- _ -�� � ••° IL 0
ar
-
-%.
M
AJS —
41
' s E
z
IT 1T" ig•'�I2Q , V
fo 2� 56.2 g I 7
i0
�5 N ^ � j
ARK
I.Z
;
' 1, 28 19 aIT16. S14115 12
! - I
�+.
� 30 ZS - � - �1i
CD
T 32 i 33
EDEN r,
l
low
CITY (A NlOL NI)
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
CASE NO. 90 -910
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW TEMPORARY SEASONAL OUTDOOR RETAIL SALES AT
2250 COMMERCE BLVD.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
will meet in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday,
April 24, 1990 to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow Temporary Seasonal
Outdoor Retail Sales at 2250 Commerce Blvd., legally described as follows:
Lots 38 and 39, "Koehler's Addition to Mound" Lake Minnetonka, and; That
part of the Northerly 96 feet of the Burlington Northern Railroad right -
of -way running through the Southwest quarter of the Fouthwest quarter •
of Section 13, Township 117 North, Range 24 West of the 5th Principal
Meridian, which lies between the Southerly extension of the East line
of Lots 38, "Koehler's Addition to Mound" Lake Minnetonka, and a line
drawn parallel with and 317 feet West, measured at right angles to, said
East line of Lot 38 and its Southerly extension. PID /13- 117 -24 -33 0077.
All persons appeasing at said hearing will be given the opportunity to be
heard.
G w - w x.t C _{/ t, ,
Francene C. Clark, City Clerk
Mailed to abutting property owners within 350' radius on April 12, 1990. Published
in "The Laker" on April 9, 1990.
CIT) cA Nis A "NI
MEMORANDUM
T0: VCity Council 4 -10 -90
Planning Commission 3 -26 -90
Park Commission 4 -12 -90
FROM: Jim Fackler, Park Director.
RE: DNR Application #90 -6225
'r
Tne affected area shown on PNR Application 1190 -6225 is private property.
The Project Sponsor, Larry Walker is requesting to place an 80 by 30 foot,
6 inch deep sand blanket at Harrisons Bay, 5311 Baywood Shores Drive.
City of Mound property will not be affected by this work unless the
contractor plans to use city property, such as a road end, or a park
to gain access to the site. Contractors should notify the City prior
to crossing city property. Any damage to city property will be evaluated;
the applicant will be required to restore any damage.
JF:pj
• ari 7
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
March 26. 1990
,.r .. ,.
A.
7►7
The commission had no significant comments on these applications.
•
qqg 0
Wow NO
t STATE OF
HIESC4 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
METRO REGION WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL. MN SS 106 fU NO
296 -7523
DNR PROTECTED WATERS PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBER
REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND COMMENTS
•
•
DATE: M A FcH 14, 1gyQ
To: VSCoE - k Et-1 14inMELL AWM— JON Ditr•►cu
L h c D — A F M— BRvtE C„ILBCEZ'Sc,nj
t4 ws0 — RoN QvAN3t -cK
CITY OF 0ovW -SSM fEcKLE9
FROM: CEIL STRAUSS. AREA HYDROLOGIST
WATERS AFFECTED: L A KE hrNNETo (2 — 133 P)
HARRrSoNS SAy (p IS)
PROJECT SPONSOR: L ARR Y G� W L KE IZ
NATURE OF WORK: PLACC A ,SAND 13LANICCT A LONC 90 OF S'KO
Qo rm OEM, AW t XTEij0rN(r 30 vwATE9 WA RT? OF TH
ORDI►JARy Hrc WATER ELEVATlonf,
COMMENTS DUE BY: 30 a A YS
q ''9
J000
AN EOUAL 0PP0q'UN!'v EMP110YER
Rev 10/89 -� , , PERMIT APPLICATION
oe ►A R T M E N T OF i . ` � TO WORK IN MTECTEO WATER= ON WET1ANU
�' 3SOT/^\ /' IM UVM tiAM tiS MI
NATURAL RISOURCIS
Please read instructions before attempting to complete this application. r+f
v t.
n.
o
IL
lit
111,
tl�
a
I.
Y.
pp n1 S Name ;Lgst, F irst. M I.) Authorized Agent it a pplicable
Tely ptton;,Nt�Ipber,r<acf
■
rRs{ trees o umber. Iry tat 1Ipp
i
LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT (BE SURE TO INCLUDE SKETCH SHOWING HOW TO GE TO T HE SITE)
Go vernment Lot(s)
Quarter - Sec tion(s)
Sections) No.
i Township(s) No
Range(s) No.
Lot, Block, Subdivision
F.ue �lo.. kox No or4ro) c} Addres 1
I e CI t .
CQ� p�
E'Ll.. 1 '►�
Protect will affect Lake pwena a an O Wat
InarneanurnbML.
of krown
TYPE OF WORK PROPOSED (CHECK ONE)
II. TYPE OF PROJECT CHECK
ONE)
O excavate lj repair' ' '
b sllorejitl � - O •shore- protection O obstruction O dam
0 fill O remove
channel O harbor O bridge O other
O drain O abandon
. 0
1 sand blanket O permanent dock O Culvert (specify)
construct O other (specify)
install
O riprap O wharf -
E>i'TIMATN "Am cm $
h. LENGTH OF SHORELINE AFFECTED (IN FEET) _
VOLUME OF MATERIAL FILLED OR EXCAVATED (IN CUBIC YARDS):
R #F EXPLANATI ,911ill OF PROJECT( PLAIN WHAT PROJECT CONSISTS OF AND HOW WORK WILL BE DOME)
,
06. &C � �'�" 1rfa.�1 T Tor r..,a► F �J►�l� I �.A�f� ,T .:C` IC �r .I
PURPOSE OF PROJECT: (Explin !Lhy this project is needed)
•r•'l
I.' r �� l � �►'�.'r� �v � NG.V �_rZ r_r..
h �r f cll �: ♦
.• � .. �; r�� r i � l I►JC_r, r - t.e�
i ��f ♦'.1 t 1.1 : r 6.
El 11 IMENTAL WALT (Anticipated changes to, the water and related land resources, including unavoidable but detrimental effects)
ALT1111111ATIIF: (Other alternatives to afion proposed)
w w" M w spprrG 1w
711w pwwam w ,rw,wp.a ,7U �.n
IY aplw 1 Lj •c am w1 supp0ning rules vw a permit 10 work in Or aneCt Irlt Moot new prolecla0
watrls► accordance with ill supporting maps plans. and other information Submitted with this application The Information submitted and statements made
Concerning MK application art true and Carts to the best of my knowledge
STATE OF CUM
C OF �l ' ry ? i �4 , iG��._.
SubKMed and sworn to before "It this
S1gna re 0 Ownr or Autligpi gent {r Date
Signature 0 Le Oalt
lstnbuUOn
r
day of � '
� -;i - t9Lv
■
_.��.
J"YN HEIM"(CH White:
® A Blue:
DNA
SWCD
R1r pU NDTA JC-44INNESOIX
yh commlaslo. apnea
1tBDtFjNN CROM Green
Watershed Distric,
My t�toR E*m JaN►. 15.1996 Goir�enrod
City or County
SlgruNrt of Notary
1 _4
/
.
r Pink:
Army Corps of Engineers
Canary
Applicant
/Ow
��. �c „ac
i� � e
❑ SWCO Q C/C
Q W 0 C:3 USCOE
�c
_ NPAaTMIMT Or 11hQift�•
sov M. sties
gATwAI atsou41CH NIT OF CMERNMENT COMMENTS •
LOCAL U PAW 9
(To be completed b a pplrca nf)
me o Applicant (Street. RFC. Box f'b. City, ua, 2�p Code)
AAR-q �. wAU(�� s� 1t &aw ncD S�ei SS3to
►rifiJECT LOCATION I Quarter Sect"on(s) Sec"O") Township(s) Range(s) County(les)
[ T i Atm 1 t wl 1 a ea: (name and of lake, M tland, or watercourse) t
kx o �1 cTorJ f( �2'1 — �EQ� So^l s OA Y I S
I hereby submit this application for permit to' Es at r of A 1 a Date
(mark proper box)
❑appropriate water — [work in protected waters - - -- ------------------- - --- --
Section 11 (To be completed by local unit of governmenf)
The following local unit of government comments and /or recommendations are submitted for conelderadon by the
Department of Natural Resources In the disposition of the referenced permit application. (Y R RESPONSE M 8T
SUBMITTED TO TMK DNR WITHIN 30 DA s.) Water Aoproprlation Permit Appli *Wm and r Wa!erf Petra
Appkatlons are to be som to the DNR Regional Office, SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CORRECT MAILING' ADORES8E8
NO
ice. • �'
•
Was the proposed project fi inspected tyy this loca u nit o government?
k,,.. r•Q Kim a ITitle
Authorized Signature
1
ONO OYES (if Yes, give viewer's name)
I .
Title Date Telephone No ( Area Code)
g ame of responding Soil and Water Conservation District. Watershed District. City or County
Address (of the avow named IoW unit of government)
(DNA — Division of Waters addresses / back)
//arrlaw
►saI
MOUND
I�00
Cooks Day
a•.nwa
SEE MAP 22
lrr-1
L
T
•i Bay
ev d It
Bay .,
s
� nvya
M
N
0
�AcM
v_
•
!
I ,
I I !
I I
/C ' %• K Y [ � X l
AA
.-4
s
, ; A-A to
on
O
to
0
I M ( STATE OF \ C 94� /
OF NATURAL RESOURCES
METRO REGION WATERS - 1200 WARNER ROAD, ST. PAUL, MN 55106
►NONE N0. 296 - 7523 FILE NO.
CERTIFIED
February 21, 1990
11r. Larry Walker
5311 Baywood Shores Drive
Round, MN 55364
Dear Mr. Walker:
RE: UNAUTHORIZED FILL, V9O -6116, LAKE MIHNETONKA (27 -133)
HARRISON'S BAY 115, CITY OF MOUND, HENNEPIN COUNTY
on February 6, 1990 Department of Natural Resources personnel
conducted an investigation on your property relative to certain fill
activities you have undertaken. This investigation revealed that
some of the work took place below the ordinary high water level
(OHW) for Lake Minnetonka of 929.4' (NGVD, 1929) and that you had no
valid DNR permit which authorized any such alteration. The action, .
therefore, constitutes a misdemeanor according to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 105.42 and is punishable by fines up to $700
and /or 90 days in jail.
Placing sand on the lakebottom can nave several damaging impacts to
the sensitive ecology ^f the area, such as:
- Covering aquatic vegetation or invertebrate life which
damages food chain, nesting sites, etc..
- Smothering plants and root systems that stabilize lakebed and
shoreline from erosion at higher water levels.
- Disturbing the ecological diversity and aquatic habitat for
fish and wildlife.
- In nucky areas, sand will sink or erode and not result in
improved recreation areas.
- Causes temporary sediment disturbance and turbidity affecting
local water quality.
- May result in filamentous algae blooms in the area as a
result of eliminating rooted aquati- plan's.
In order to be in eomptlance with State rules, you have the
following alternatives for &,ctior:
1) Voluntarily rem:, e the `ill placed below the Lake
Minnetonka OHr; cf 929.4' (�im , 1929) and restore the
lakebed to its original cross - section. A written schedule
for the restoraticr must of approved by the ;�.r•
1 00q AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Larry Walker
February 21, 1990
• Page Two
2) Retain a sand blanket that is i,o more than 50 -feet wide
along the shore, 10 -feet waterward of the OHW, 6- inches
thick, and meets all other conditions for work that is
allowed without a D14R permit (a brochure that summarizes
the work that can be done without a DNR permit is
enclosed). Voluntarily restore the area to its original
condition. Location of the sand blanket and a written
schedule must be approved by the DNR.
3) Apply for an after - the -fact permit to retain a portion of
the work you have completed (a set of permit application
forms is enclosed for your use). Depending on the outcome
of the after -the -fact permit application review, a permit
may be granted for part of the work (subject to
restoration of anything in excess of what is authorized).
It is possible that the permit application would be denied
in all respects. In the case of after - the -fact permit
applications, the normal application fee is doubled and a
minimum $100 field inspection fee is charged. Using the
enclosed fee worksheet, please calculate the normal fee
and submit a check or money order, payable to the
• Department of Natural Resources, for double that amount,
plus $100.
We recommend that you pursue voluntary restoration, as it avoids
additional cost and legal action. Should you choose to submit an
after - the -fact permit application, the minimum additional fees and
further legal action are necessary.
You are advised that you must comply with all rules, regulations,
requirements or standards of other applicable federal, state, or
local agencies and units of government. Compliance with DNR rules
and regulations does not preclude compliance with other authorities.
The Minnehaha Creek a tershed District (Ron Quanbeck @ 473 - 4224),
the City of Mound (472 -1155) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Ken Harrell @ 220 -0379) should be contacted regarding pertinent
regulations.
If within 15 days of your receipt of this letter we have not
received an application for permit or a schedule /plan for
restoration from you, we will be forced to consider the appropriate
legal action necessary to protect the ,ut interest. Violations
of state water law are routinely referred to the Department's
Division of Enforcement for appropriate action. A Conservation
Officer nay be in contact with you to ensure the terms and
conditions of any approved restoration Flan or alter -the -fact permit
• are met.
l CO5
Larry Walker
February 21, 1990
Page Three
You are advised that the work completed is a misdemeanor and that
any additional work could be construed as a second, separate
misdemeanor. No further work shall be done unless directly ordered
by the Conservation Officer or in accordance with written
authorization from this office.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
Area Hydrologist Ceil Strauss at 296 -7523.
Sincerely,
Jo n Linc Stine
Regional Hydrologist
C266:kap
Enclosures
cc: Ken Harrell, USCOE
Minnehaha Creek WSD
City of Mound
S. Walter, C.O.
J. Fax, St. Paul maters
r�
�J
U
•
�II
•
RESOLUTION 90. 90-
RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER $124,204 FROM THE COMMERCE
PLACE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND TO THE COMMERCE
PLACE DEBT SERVICE FUND TO CLOSE OUT THAT FUND
WHEREAS, the Commerce Place tax increment development
project was started in 1985; construction occurred during 1985
and 1986; and the title opinion and final plat was approved
during 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Commerce Place Capital Improvements Fund
final revenues and expenditures as of 12 -31 -89 are as follows:
Revenues
Bond Proceeds $1,722,363
Interest on Investments 67,010
Miscellaneous 10,363 $1,799,736
Expenditures
Supplies 100
Other Services and Charges 195,251
Acquisition i Site Improvements $1.480.181 $1.675.532
Balance $124,204
=MW MW
WHEREAS, the Tax Increment agreement states that any
money left in the Capital Projects Fund shall be used solely for
the purpose of payment of principal and interest on the bonds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council
of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve a transfer
of $124,204 from the Commerce Place Capital Improvements Fund to
the Commerce Square Debt Service Fund to close out that fund.
The foregoing Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The foregoing Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
• Attest: City Clerk
/007
1
•
I am and I represent Citizens
Concerned for Dutch Lake. I am here tonight to ask you City Council
members for money to fight Eurasian Milfoil which is infesting Dutch
Lake.
This is our group's third appearance before you. At our last
meeting with you in the fall of last year, we notified you of the
Milfoil infestation and asked for money. You were strong in your
verbal support and requested three things of us:
1. That we provide specific data about costs.
2. That we demonstrate a "good faith effort" by collecting
money from the neighbors using Dutch Lake
3. And that we come to you with a specific dollar amount
that we want from you.
We have done those things which I'll now list.
First to provide you with specific data about costs. We
solicited bids from three companies, copies of wh -ch are provided.
The bids rangy om a low of $183 per acre to a high of $229 per
acre. We estimate 5 to 8 acres are infested. This would mean a
total cost of $1,464 to $1,842. Lets say roughly $1,500 to $2,000
for first application and, almost certain a second spot application.
•
/0O8
Second to demonstrate a "good faith effort" by collecting
money from users of Dutch Lake. Before telling you of our monetary
collection, let me say we have collected sig itures of over 75
households as a sign of support. Dutch Lake property owners have
had significant property tax hikes this last year, but we went
further. We have collected enough money to be equal partners with
you in sharing the cost.
We have also found another source of cost sharing. Through our
efforts with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, they
have agreed, (barring unforseen circumstances), to share one half
• the cost up to $1,000.
Third this brings us to the third point, specific dollar
requests. We are asking you to share the costs of the work
provided, which will be between $1,500 and $2,000 depending on the
size of the infestation this summer.
The DNR, barring unforseen circumstances will provide money for
half the cost up to $1,000. That leaves at most, $1,000. At this
point, we see splitting the cost three ways, with our neighborhood
organization Citizens Concerned for Dutch Lake, with you the
Mound City Council and with the Mirnetrista City Council for the amount of $333
each.
We have done as You requeste ,f us. 1 +P noed to art now or we
• could lose Dutch Lake. .�e now ;ask .or Your financial. support.
tr H OEPARTMENT �j� STATE OF
H l5 22 S O U LTV OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DNA INFORMATION 500 LAFAYE7E ROAD • ST PAUL. MINNESOTA • '�5'S5 40
(612) 296.6 +57
'arch 7, 1990
Richard Magner
Chairman, Citizens Concerned for Dutch Lake
6020 Aspen Road
Mound, MN 55364
(Far Mr. Wagner:
As I indicated in our March 5 telephone conversation, the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources is presently in the position to share the
cost o` Eurasian water milfoil control in Dutch Lake. There is a slight
possibility this could change if we find new infestations this spring which
have a higher priority for control.
At present, we feel that the eradication of milfoil is possible if the
infestation is caught before it car spread throughout a waterbody. The
Dutch Lake infestation inpears to be small enought to make eradication an •
option. However, low water clarity at the time of the August inspection
injects an element of uncertainty. That considered, a herbicide treatment
covering up to five acres may be sufficient to eradica the plant.
In this case, the DNR is willing tc share on a 50% basis up to a total
DNR cost of $1,OOL.00. This amount should cover the need for repeat
treatment and, if needed, a treatment area increase to 8 acres.
Permits for aquatic plant management are handled by Chris Domeier at DNR
Region 6 Headquarters (296- 2959). If you have questions about cost
sharing, please feel free to call me at 296 -9783.
Sincerely, 1
e/7
Jack Skrypek, Chief
Division of Fish and Wildlife
Ecological Services Section
cc. ;. Enger
C. Domeier
•
MNNE34[A •
1M0
/010 AN E J.. a_ , PP_'PT. LAITY EMG-L",E4
LAKE MANAGEMENT, Inc.
/A. 10400 IH51h `.itierl North MariO it ,Mi i) COUOM. MN `,' 047
612.433.3:83
PROPOSAL FOR AQUATIC NUISANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Submitted to:
Name Dutch Lake Homeowners Associatiun
Dick Wagner
Address 6020 Aspen Road
City, State, Zip Mound, MN 55364
Phones)
Date January 4. 1990
Lake Management, Inc. proposes to furnish, at it's expense, all of the necessary
chemicals, subject to state regulations, equipment and labor as well as to direct
and administer treatment for the control of the excessive growth of Eurasian
}aq{ (N@ t 7r gW-V ilVM in the water area described a watermilfo:
follows: Dutch I.ake - ;229.00 /acre for 5 to 8 acres
In consideration of the goods anc: materials furnished, use of equipment and
services rendered, payment is to be:
Dollars ($ )
with terms as follows: Net 30 days, 14%1month on overdue amounts
Lake Management, Inc. will post such signs as may be required to restrict the use
of treated water.
The state permit, when required, shall describe the type of growth contemplated
for control in this proposal, unless otherwise limited herein.
Lake Management, Inc. carries insurance for both liability and property damage
and workers' compensation and will, upon request, confirm that coverage by
certificates issued to the customer.
This proposal may be withdrawn by Lake Management. Inc. if not accepted within
30 days. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
The above payment and cunditiony are satisfactory and are accepted. Lake
Management, Inc. is authorized to conduct the management program describ -a
above. Payment will be made as indicated above.
Signature
Representing
Date
V//
IAKL \ij%N,\(;E.\IENT
Mr. Oary Nordstrom
Concerned Citizens for Dutch Lake
5856 Or"dview Blvd.
Mound, M it., zmta 55364
•
�urgi8n Water Milfoil Control - Dutch Like
The undersigned declares that he /she has examined the proposed treatment eree(s) of Dutch Lake
for Eurasian water Mllfoil control and hereby proposes and agrees to for the 1990 season.
A) Eurasian Water rtilfoil Treatment:
°� = s/, 090• `M
• 1 Treatment Price per acre .��� x 5 acres
s2 Treatment Price per acre ZoY °O x 5 acres
(if requested)
Note' Pricing does not include the MN. O.N.R. permit fN of =240.00
B) Above Pricing Intl es
o: Act geA.1CV4. si rr- p,,,itualral.
A•c:v.4r1G . @Af Lp P,ecoi c rS•
P1 gla I i P110[ t S S LNG-
Midwest Aqua Care Ouarantees that if you are not satisfied with the results contact us post
treatment (Within 1 14 days of the original treatment) and we will repeat the application free of
charge We will not bill until the results are obvious.
Respectfully Suomitted,
MIDWEST AQUA CARE, INf,.
Thomas) Grrtz
President _ MIDWEST AQUA CARE, INC.
15001 DR. • MEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 • (6121 9346542
December I st , 1989
•
uKe
. ..........
LAKE RESTORATION, INC.
�
Mr. Dirk Wagner
6020 As pet► Rd .
"lnund, MK 553fii
Dear Mr. Wagner:
Thank you for tali init the hire to shm. me Gut ch lahe — I
unfL!rstand ynur con-ern rf- 3hrdiii% Pur•.►sian cater la►ilfoil And the
rteps you and �'VtJr lalit• Fls , o tiition m eiiioot'7 art' utkilltL -trq' %eat
important „nose.
Steve Decntor iw the persun I mentioned who w+mut thrtlugh the same
provers as you with the C i t y of Chanhassen for h i c lak and C.
• others. His numher is 474 -9299. I would highly re,.omulend that
you contact him.
As per our telephone f_unverL al ion, the t•ulue of the treatment and
inspection programs is listed beloal:
1. Eurasian treatment wit 2,4 -D i, f183. per a( •re -
ll
treatments wi 11 be made a gr;,uular b1 ()6f r t hi _h shoots pellets up
to 50 feet. Thus, treatment. vrews do not have to ')o7at over
treatment areas and cause fr•agmentati. -)n and consequently spread
of eur'asian water milfl,il.
2. inspections ore Sll por acre.
3. Aerial video taping with depth genet r:.ttinl; tt., ident
rura!•ian water milfoil l,eds is $225 pc.r shorlino mile. There is
tt minim -im hurle t.ilh thi - .t•rti .
.1. 198" n1i "It'l 1 re'utnk• r,....
N11ltr ( {'� ?tr
1i,n• I ' rc4 ;ai) (+1711 - rl,.tf''_
ion.• -tl t1 J�,� � r�'Ini,•r.- �` ! t• �' ,. t t;, r� - ,, -,•t i
�l /f;
/00
• • 4 71.94,
(D
LAKE RESTORATION, INC.
19 b 9 (' L' r a S I Ei I I t r' f7' 'I t III V I S f i Li
Lake Ro-becca 5 acres
Lah e Ztimbra 2 - 5 a r v
Lac 1,, a -ros
Lake 16 1 i I i 1 #7. t t, I I lizi 40 1 ) hoin"s
Clearwater lule in Annari&ilc I I
Please let me kiiuw hob I caii be ,f' f , jrffi--:- serviov.
hevin Fr--Isl-h
f
ION •
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
Ap: - . 4. 1 4�cj
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT: City of Mound, Minnesota
1990 Seal Coat Program
MFRA #6173
Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
Enclosed is a tabulation of the bids received on Friday, March Oth t'or III,
1990 Seal Coat :rogram. Bids ranged from a low of 529,450.w. submitted by
Bituminous Roadways, Inc., to a high of 537,200.00. The Engineer's Estim;tt.•
for this project was $29,000.00. Bituminous Roadways, Inc., has done the s, ;,l
coat project for the City of St. Paul Park for thv last tw%o years, with
satisfactory results. The Mound streets scheduled for this year's seal ,„nt
are probably the easiest in the City to complete, so this is a good time t„
break in a new Contractor. Therefore, we are rorommF•ndir,g that fii luminous
Roadways, - be awarded a contract in the amount of 529,450.00.
US.
If you have any questions or need addit_ionril inform<�t.i,�r,, pjt - ;j , , mtr,rt
Vev.v truly yours,
McC',NP'; H - -Atih
John Cc,merot:
.JC: jmj
Frnc 1 osu res
0
1016'
- BID TAB -
CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA •
1990 SEAL COAT PROGRAM
MFRA #6173
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS, INC.
ITEM
1. 2356.505 Bituminous Material
for Seal Coat Furnisned
and Applied
2. Seal Coat Aggregate (FA -2 or
FA -3) Applied
TOTAL BID .......................
ALLIED BLACKTOP CO.
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
31,000 GAL $ 0.7125 /GAL $ 22,087.50
1,550 TON $ 4.75 /TON $ 7.362.50
...... ..............................$ 29.450.00
ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1. 2376 .50; Bituminous Material i
for Seal Coat Furnished
and Applied 31,000 GAL $ 0.78 /GAL $ 24,180.00
2. Seal Coat Aggregate (FA -2 or
FA -3) AprilEd 2.3110 TON $ 3.69/TON $ 5,719.50
TOTAL: 31D ............................. ..............................$ 29.899.50
ASTECH CORPOi :ATION
ITEM QUANTIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1. 2556 .505 Bituminous Material
for Seal Coat Furnished
and Applied 31,000 GAL $ 0.85;GA1, S 26,350.00
cr
7.�J�1
A. .:' .............................. ...............................
•
/01w
U
•
BILLS - - -- -APRIL 10, 1990
BATCH 0033
BATCH 0034
Un'tog
Thorpe Distrib
Uniform rental
March beer
TOTAL BILLS
93,249.14
78,545.25
545.59
13,626.90
185,967.28
/0/'1
I
G_RCH
«.E JOUPNAL
�P - 01
CIT+ OF r
Ulm IWIOICE M HOLD
K. INVOIrE ►M+P DATE DATE STATUS
00
DESCRIPTION
ON9 PRE -PAID
,k
LIA
ir "or.
'x'.40
,tri-CD
PPE -PAID
9ELL30Y COPPORA' :ON VENDOR TOTAL
1
9746 PRE -PAID
`.0.00
RCA MIiiT REFRESH
3130/ 3/20/
5p. no
Jill -CD
RKAU OF CPIM!NAL *MEN# VENDOF TOTAL
`.0..10
00808 PPE -PAID
3,700.00
CR LIN!ON 3/17 PR
3/30/00 3/30/
3,708.f10
J7l -CD
CITY COINT CREDIT UK;GN VEI M TO TAL
3708,00
Cr" PRE -PAID
23.41
REPLEN P/C -LIQ
3/30/90 3130/00
1
JAL
PRE -PAID
31.19
REPLEN P/C-
6.00
REPL04 P/C-POL -GAS
3130/90 3/30/
37.1
Jlll -CD
CITY OF MW VENDOt TOTAL
60,64
003 PRE -PAID
!C.00
KM VIDEO
3/30/ 3/30/00
10.00
Jill - CD
CITY aF ST Lr ;IS PAw VEM10tt TOTAL
10,40
CA9" PRE -PAID
232.30
LIFE INS
3/30/00 3130100
M.30
Jill -CD
rAPERCIAL LIFE INS CO VENDOR TOTAL
23:.30
01001 PRE -PA`D
10 ".3`
FEB SALES TAM
4,734.14
FER SALES TAX
3130/ 3/30/90
4,$?7."
Jill -CD
PRE -PAID
1,44x.1`
SIT 3/17 PR
31301 3/30190
2,4
Jill -CD
LTM ISSIMP OF WO MEE VENDOR TOTAL.
729
r1n8 PRE -PAID
11 Y' ".00
0 0 D0:41 DTNASTv
11,288.00
' 000% DYNASTY
73ON RAPIDS Dfi vkEF P;Y}N '4N710P TOTAL
` t "✓.
PRE "PAID
1 K
L^
F t _.
DATE 3;361x;
TILE 10.43.46
PPE -PAID CNECV
ACCOW N1/16ER A}O1111T DEM 1 DATE
l010 700.46 30(347 3/20i
1010 1000.02 300171 3127/°0
01- 4130.4110
1010 50.)0 30374 312k1
01.2040 -4000
1010 3708.00 305 312:1
71- 7100-'."00
1010 73.41 300111 3/19/90
01- 4140 -: '00
01- 4140 - =10
1010 37,19 3030 3/11/00
OS- 4040 .240
1010 10.00 3001q 3 /101
01 -20/n -4000
1010 :3:.30 30VI 3/22/
73- f K -4000
71. 3
1010 4837.09 3033 3/15190
01- 2040 -0000
1010 24".15 3035E 3121/
INA 22576.t>n 30394 3/301
;-,r.oc
303030, - c -Sc,
-3 j L
!91' 30330 G on
•
/o19
CAGE =
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE
3/30/x`
AF•CO2-01
Cl fly OF Pam
TIME
10.43.46
VENDOM
INVOICE me HOLD
PRE -PAID
CWCW
NO. 1MMICE WOR
DATE DATE STATUS
NQW
DESCRIPTION
ACMJWT WWI
AMOUNT
CHED 1
DATE
•
PRE -PAID
37
lI0
X1•7100-`-10
433.10
MINE
71- 7 100 -95 :0
7.54•
DISC
71 r,�O
3 /30 / 3130 /
W.7:
JMNL -CD
1010
901.72
?�)iM
3 !: ro0
ED PHILIPS I SONS
%VW TOTAL
118
F171
PREPAID
300,00
MCFOA COW ADVANCE
01-4040.1110
3130190 3/30!
300.00
JHL-CD
1010
300.00
?0339
3/19/00
FRAtCEl7E CLARK
VEMDOR TOTAL
300,00
9 1'22
PRE -PAID
120.00
TIME NlA'1T SEMINAR
01-4190-4110
120.00
TIME W SEMINAR
01-4140 -4110
120.00
TIME Off SEMINAR
01-4w -4110
3/30/90 3/30190
360.00
JK-CD
1010
360.00
30340
3119/90
FRANKLIN INTERNAT'L INSTI# VENDOR TOTAL
360,00
G I rp
PRE -PAID
15.00
LMCIT MORN^tOP- SYINMER
73 -7300 -4110
3/30/90 3!30; 1 �,:
15.00
,JRML_CD
1010
15.00
30355
31 t90
GOVT TRAINING SERVICES
VENDOR TOTAL
15.0
51';55
PRE -PAID
1,155.00
w _W ?117 PP.
01- 2040 -Nm
3130190 3/30/
1,151.00
,Et1l. -CI
1010
1155.00
3030
3%221"
o r AT WEST LIFE ASSIJRIANCE VENDOR TOTAL
1155.00
01
PRE -PAID
268.87
GRP HLTH PREM
O1 :040 0000
3/30!90 3/30"
269.81
JPL-CD
1010
168.87
34368
PIP HEALTH PLAN
VENOM TOTAL
268.87
61
PRE -PAID
428.80
LIO
71 -7100 -
168.11
MINE
71-7100-9510
11.94-
DISC
71-7100-9564
4.94
FRI
71- 7100-9600
3!39/ 3130!
`,89.°1
JRML-CD
1010
589.91
30348
3,
FRE -PAID
771.75
MINE
71- 7100-9520
15.W-
DISC
71-7100-
14.21
FRT
71.1100
3!30/ 3/30
770.41
JMNL-CD
1010
770.41
303 ?8
3/27!
rF :,,,, r'QQFH:F 4 Cr1MC:NN VENDOR TOTAL
1366.3:
.-.,j
FGA -PAID
15.00
FILING FrE -C HALL REMDD
10 - k W. -41 N)
1`.
JPL-CD
101r
15.
Ki-r4 :I
! °,,rr
LTS kc-i'ra FILE FEE
')1-4?' a 'r
15.fv
,FNL-CD
101^
15.00
31",
•f'A co ?�I?j 'f
y •r,
/ O/ I
0 43E 3
PU9CNASE JOURNAL
DATE
3;3G/%
AP CO2 -01
CITY OF MDUIwM
Tilt
10.43.46
VEND01 INVOICE ME HOL
P1E4
C►ECY
10. INVOICE M DATE DATE STAIM
MM
DESCRIPTION
ACCOINT NUMBER
MD1NT
CHECK 1
DATE
W. PRE-PAID
298.46
3/17 M DELI
01 -:040 -0000
3/30/ 31301
288.46
JOL -CD
1010
298.46
30360
3!22 /°0
4M CO SNrP M i COLLECTo YOM TOTAL
288.46
X10 PRE -PAID
70.00
KGISTR -BOYD FF 11
-- 4170 -4110
3/30/ 3130/
70.00
J?TL-CD
1010
70.00
30345
3/1
YET/ TECHNICAL, CILLEGE YBMMt TOTAL
70.00
1:301 PRE-PAID
512.90
ICMA DEF COW 3/17 PR
01 -2040 -0000
3/30/90 3/30/
512.90
JK-CD
1010
512.90
30361
3/22190
ICM NETIREMM TAT -457 YOM TOTAL
512.90
IM IRE-PAID
91.99
1CrA 3/17 PR
01-:040-0000
3/30/0 3/30/90
91.98
JK_M
1010
91.58
30362
3/22/90
ION AETIAE 811 IM -401 VEMOR TOTAL
91.98
I..w PIE-PAID
20.00
ICBO COW REGISTR -N STAR
01- 4190 -4110
3/30/0 3/30/90
20.00
JML -CD
1010
20.00
30375
3/:6/90
INTERMTL CNK LIM OF. M OR TOTAL
20.00
,112571 PRE -PAID
107.25
16.5 CONTRACT 1/3185
01- 4340 -3190
3/30190 3/30/90
107.25
JK -CD
1010
107.25
30352
3/20/
AM TAFFE VEND TOTAL
107.25
2579 PRE-PAID
721.78
LIQ
71-7100 -9510
53.17
NINE
71- 7100 -
15.40-
0130
71-110^-9560
3130/ 3,'301
759.55
JlL -CD
1010
759.55
30349
3!20/
PIE -PAID
1,608.48
LIQ
71-7100-9510
569.15
MINE
71-7100-
37.87 -
DISC
71- 7100 -0560
3/30/90 3/30/90
2,139.76
JdL -CD
1010
2130.76
30379
3/27/
JIMMON BP.OS I aM&E LI# VETM TOTAL
2899.31
83051 PIE-PAID
10,8.91
FIT 3/17 PR
01-2040 -0000
3/30/90 3/30/90
10,859.91
ft-CD
1010
INM.91
30357
3/22/90
W.OLETTE BAIT( - MM VENDOP TOTAL
10858.91
iC" PRE -PAID
1,316.56
MED CNTR MM
01 2044 0000
3/30/90 3/30'90
:,316.56
YL -CD
1010
1316.56
3036
3!22/
or CENTER HEALTH RAN VEW TUTAL
1316.51
'C:6R PREPAID
1'2.`f)
MBA IN_'
01 -; �Y1
3x30/ 3 %?0!N
1 ^:.50
JRrI•CD
101
1�:.�:'
3'' ?�!
_ :. �"
4N BENEF 1 T ASST/ VE KX* TOTAL
•
r�
�J
/7a o
PAGE 4
PUACNAIE JOURNAL
DATE 3/30/91)
AP- 002-01
CITY W on
LINE 10.43.46
VENDOR
INVOICE DUE "OLD
PRE-fAIO CMEM
N0. INVOICE NMMBTt DATE DATE STATUS
AMOUNT
DEUIPTION
ACCOW NUMBER
ARM CHM B DATE
Ie Il3~tlo
PRE -PAID
200.00
IEED Nw -ow
01- 4340 -3800
3130'00 ?'30!00
200.00
JAL-0
1010
200.00 30373 3/261
NN OPT OF NATURAL REUK VENDOR TOTAL
200.00
0 0401
PRE -PAID
288.00
DEF COMP 3/17 PR
01 -2040 -0000
3/30/ 3130/
288.00
JKi31
1010
298.00 30364 3!22/
RA RETIREMENT STSTB VENDOR TOTAL
288.00
IM20
PRE -PAID
1745
REPLEN FIViO METER MIALIM
01 -4070 -3210
68.15
fu4m mm ovit No
01-4020-3210
27.00
RE M iR fS METER NACU
01- 4040 -3210
3.30
REPLN WM METER No
01 -4060 -3210
109.70
Ir M MM ME MFR NO
01- 4090-3210
13.40
REM IMAM METER NACN
22 1179 -3210
12.50
IEM MN METER RACK
71- 7100 -3210
55.63
em mm METER No
01- 4340 -3210
3.25
REPIM P< M METER No
81-4350.3210
10 ?.95
AMD FM METER NACN
01-4190-3210
54.%
ILM MN METER w&
73- 7300.3210
54.%
REfLBI mm METER No
78 -7800 -3210
103.73
OVUM FM METER NACN
01 4140 - 321U
3.75
REF MI MM METER RACK
01- 4280 -3210
2.
MET' D MIN METER Moth
01
17.85
IEPLEN PMBIMRi wo No
01-4090 -3210
1.50
REPIEN PISTE METER NO
80- 8000 -4100
•
54.00-
AEP D Fm METER MACH
01-4320 -3210
3130/ 3/'30/90
600.00
JK-00
1010
600.00 30337 3/19/
PRE-PAID
64.54
POSTS-OM BILLS
73-7300-3210
64.35
PO61O -INTER BILLS
78- 7800 -3210
3/30/ 3/30/v0
129.09
JK
1010
129.09 30354 3/22/90
HOUK POSTMASTER
VENDOR TOTAL
729.09
N3631
PRE -PAID
$77.58
MIL LTB INS
01-2040-0000
3/30/90 3/30190
577.58
jK-0
1010
577.58 30372 3/22/90
VTUAL OMIT LIFE VENDOR TOTAL
577.56
Fm
PRE -PAID
6,557.01
PERA 3/17 PR
01 -2040 -0000
3/30/90 3/30190
6,557.01
JK-r
1010
6%7.01 30359 3/22190
P E R A
VENDOR TOTAL
6557.u.
P4r,20
PRE -PAID
155.00
NLC COW- .ESSEN
01-4020-4110
3!30 /0n 3/30/00
755.00
.1RIL-CD
1010
755.00 30341 31
p+TLL1S JESSEN
' 4NDOR TOTAL
755.7
�VV
PRE-PAID
7,(+ld,.92
P}f Pro
01 - 0000
:V
P1f PREN-RETIWEE
nI- 414n-1510
"�9..4.
JRNL
191^
, 4- ;.
.-
/o A
PAR 5
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE
3/30190
W- CO2-01
CITY OF ON
TIME
10.43.46
yew INVOICE ME MOLD
FRE -LAID
OEM
W. INVOICE NMN1 DATE DATE STATUS
MAY
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT KM
MUNT
DECK a
DATE
PM ICINS OF MMN VM TOTAL
7966,4_
04171 PRE -PAID
1,031.1
LIQ
71-7100 - 9 510
73.45
MINE
7 1-7100-9520
21.38- DISC
71- 7100 -9560
3/30/40 3/30/
1,083.16
J+NL -CD
1010
1083.26
30351
3/:0/
PREPAID
1,104.81
LIQ
71-7100 -4510
185.70
MINE
7 1-7100.9520
23.95-
DISC
71- 7100-
3/30190 3/30/
1,266.56
JRNL -CD
1010
1266.56
30381
3/17190
R KITT MIME i SPIRUS %W, TOTAL
2349.82
S435S PREPAID
42.00
DINER - C.O.M. RM
01- 4020.2200
3/30/90 3/30/90
42.00
J1L -CD
1010
42.00
30353
3/20/90
SCOTTY 8'S YOM TOTAL
42.00
54403 PRE -PAID
861.20
MLC CONV -JIWON
01 -4020 -4110
3/30/90 3/30/90
861.20
JML -CD
1010
861.20
30341
3/19/90
SKIP JOHNSON Yom TOTAL
861.20
54499 PRE -PAID
14,996.91
'90 CEEV 414 Y/PLOM
60- 6000 -3000
3/30/90 3/30/90
14,996.91
,AML -CD
1010
14!6.91
30312
3/29/90
STAR -NEST CWEV/OL05 VENDOR TOTAL
14906.91
54511 991E -PAID
508.92
CA UNION 3/17 PR
01- 2040 -0000
3/30/90 3/30/
508.92
JML -CD
1010
508.92
30366
3/22/90
STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNION VENDOR TOTAL
508.92
51634 PRE -PAID
680.00
8 REGISTR-STATE FIRE MOM
= -4170 -4110
3/30/90 3/30190
680.00
JaL -CD
1010
600.00
30346
3/19/90
SONTMKSTERN TECMN COLLEGE MM TOTAL
680.40
T4825 PRE -PAID
60.00
TOASTMASTERS- JESSEN,MW ON
01- 4020 -4130
3/30/90 3/30/90
60.00
JRNL -CD
1010
60.00
30395
3130!"
TOAOTMYIBTM INTETWTIONAL VENDOR TOTAL
60.00
16057 PRE -PAID
16.50
SEWER MAINT REIMB
78- 7840 -3800
3/30190 3130/90
200
JRNL -CD
1010
26.50
30344
3119/90
CHARLES RTE VER OR TOTAL
26.50
TOTAL ALL VENDORS
93,249,14
00 ? 3
•
/0AA
FAE i
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE 3?1.'
AP- CO2-Ol
CITY OF ROUND
TIRE 16.19.32
VENDOR
INVOICE DUE HOLD
PRE -PAID DW
10. INVOICE NO
DATE DATE STATUS
AV MY
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
4V11T DECK 1 DATE
r. 77
MAR OFFICE SUPPLIES
01 -4040 -2100
7.96
MAR OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-40W -2100
29.44
MAR OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-4140.2100
25.97
MAR OFFICE SIFPLIES
01-43 2100
7.96
RYW OFFICE SUPPLIES
01 -4340 -;100
3.98
MAR OFFICE SUPPLIES
01.4'.V -:100
3.
"" OFFICE SUPPLIES
71 -7100 -:100
3.98
r1AR OFFICE SUPPLIES
73 -7300 -2100
3.98
R{W OFFICE SIPPLIES
78-7800-2140
25.97
MAR OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-4020-2140
22.80
RWR OFFICE SUPPLIES
01-4095.2100
3/31/90 3/31!'
174.79
JRNL -CD
1010
ACRD -HN
VENDOR TOTAL
174.79
80500
183.00
EXHAUST SYST- GENO'S
01-4280 -3810
157.00
FEW 111
73-7300-3610
3/31/90 3/31190
340.00
AL-CD
1010
BABID AUTO )TIVE
VENDOR TOTAL
340.00
80540
4.12
RAH► OXYGEN
73 -7300 -2200
4.13
MAR OXYGEN
78-7800-2200
8.25
MAR OXYGEN
01- 4290-'-''00
3/31/90 3/31/90
16.50
JK -CD
1010
BATWE COPANY
VENDOR TOTAL
16.50
77
6,560.00
MAR RECYCLE SERV
01-4270 -4200
3/31194 3/31190
6,560.00
JK-CD
1010
Ft RECYCLING SYSTEMS OF R VENDOR TOTAL
6560.00
80600
65.71
FEB GARBAGE
22-4170-3750
44.52
FEB GARBAGE
01-4290-37`0
103.88
FEB GARBAGE
01-42 -3750
3/31/ 3/31190
214.12
JRNL-CD
1010
BLACKONIAK AND SON
VENDOR TOTAL
214.12
907V
391.13
MAR ROCK
73-7300-2340
391.14
MAR ROCV
78- 7800 -2340
157.70
MAR ROCY
73-7300-2340
3/31/90 3/31190
9'30.97
Jhl. -CD
1014
IPTAN RV PRODUCTS
VENDOF TOTAL
939,97
Com.
4.99
CLEANER
01 -4: -2:50
5.49
TRIMBRITE
01-4 ?401-2310
? r31 lop ; l31 '
10.47
J?tt -CD
1010
CH *19N AUTO STORES VENDOR 'OTAL
10.47
O o 3 y
1
E£A:COA' BID AD
.' ` -?510
?"W( k) 31 1 ?: %)
:n:.tin
JPW -CD
1010
/0.).3
po 2
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE 3, :1
MO1
CITY OF MOUND
TIME 16.18.32
VtD>a INVOICE ME HOLD
PRE -PAID DIED'
I& IMIOICE OF DATE DATE STATUS
AMMMMY
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT NUMBER
AMOUNT DECK 1 DATE
OWN PIE MIND CO VENDOR TOTAL
102.40
CO'120
Q.57
WATER -LIQ STORE
71-7100.3740
?' ?11 3/311
12.57
JRNL-CD
1010
CITY DF lam VENDOR TOTAL
12.57
C04M0
35.49
MAR RUG RENT
0 i•4?20-4210
47.76
MAR RUG RENT
71-7100-4210
3/31/ 3/31/°0
83.44
JRNL-CD
1010
mm ry RENTAL VENDOR TOTAL
83.44
Cox
195.02
MAR MIX
71- 7100-9540
3/31/90 3/31/
195.02
JRK-CD
1010
COCM1 COLA WMING- MIDMEST VENDOR TOTAL
195.02
an
136.00
TELE SERVICE
01.4140 -3220
3/31/90 3/31190
136.00
JRML-CD
1010
CTI1fTAL TELEPMMOME SER# VENDIXi TOTAL
136.00
Bill$
406.65
RR LEASE TO 4/15
40-6000-3910
201.35
RR LEASE TO 4/15
01-43x-3910
3/31/90 3/31190
613.00
J K -CD
1010
03 RAIL INC VOW TOTAL
613.00
01101
3,644.94
MAR DEER
11-'?IM-
3/31/ 3/31/
3,644.84
JRML -CD
1010
Ol1T KII FRTRIBUTIMB CO VENDOR TOTAL
3644.84
01370
417.00
MAR D41EF SALARY
22- 4170 -1370
3131/ 3/311
417,00
JRNL -CD
1010
DO101.1 IIRYCE VENDOR TOTAL
417.00
D1329
2,608.10
SEPARATOR
= - 4170-5000
3/31/90 3/31/
2,606.10
JRYL-CD
1010
BMW FLUBBING i MEATIN9 VENDOR TOTAL
2609.10
01341
487.47
WASH L WAX
- 4170-22W
3131/ 3/311
487.47
JRML -CD
1010
M XWD AMERICAN CORE VENDOR TOTAL
487.47
E1420
4,
MAP BEFR
'1
?/31/W) 3/ ?1!
4,
Pt -CD
1010
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE VENDOR TOTAL
4 0 `3.60
E14M
10..73
MAP MTGS-901F
404{ - 41:0
- 4,x
MILEAGE ;HIJYIE
•
•
•
Ioj.q
PAGE 3
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE 3/31/10
AP- 002-01
CITY OF ROUND
TIRE 16.18.32
MIDOR
INVOICE DIE HMO
PRE -MID ow
10. INVOICE 00
OR DATE STATUS
ALIT
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N11OER
AMOUNT ow 1 DATE
0
301/0 3/31/90
127.72
JRNL -CD
1010
EDWARD S ME
VENDOR TOTAL
127.72
E1501
35.00
CLASSES REINB-HOFF
01-4280 -3140
3/31/90 3/31/00
35.00
J K-CO
1010
EUGENE RAF
VENDOR TOTAL
35.00
F1590
03.90
UFC TABS
M- 4170-2280
301/90 3131/90
03.90
JBL-CD
1010
FIRE INSTRUCTORS ABM VENDOR TOTAL
93.00
F1631
654.30
FEES -84 BONDS
73- 7300 -6120
301/90 3131/90
654.50
,ABL -CD
1010
FIRST 1TINBT
Vow TOTAL
654.50
F16M
153.18
ROOT SANS
78- 7800 -2300
Nano 3/31/90
153.18
JUL-M
1010
FLEXICLE PIPE TOM
m YOM TOTAL
153.18
F1690
47.71
MAR Nil
71-7100-9540
156.64
MAR RISC
71- 7100 -9M
301/90 3/31/90
204.35
JBL-CD
1010
o STAR BAR 9^1 Vow TOTAL
204.33
G1800
188.44
WK DRUM
78- 7800 -3810
1,117.20
BLUE 0005E REPAIR
01- 4:80 -3810
301/90:3/31/90
1,305.64
JIL-CD
1010
GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE
VENDOR TOTAL
1305.64
61820
116.58
APR RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT
01-4280 -3950
56.28
APR RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT
01-4340 -3950
12.06
APR RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT
01-4190-3930
12.06
APR RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT
01-4190-3950
76.39
APR RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT
01-4140 -3950
12.06
APR RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT
01-4040-3950
60.30
APR RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT
73-7300 -3
28.14
APR RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT
18-7800 -3
28.14
APR RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT
22- 4170-3950
3/71/90 3;31 /90
402.00
ft -CD
1010
OENN:RAL UDNl1NICATIM VENDOR TOTAL
402.00
01870
:`4.33
RAP Wx;H LL SALAFr
2- 4170-13
3/71/90 3/31/00
n.33
JP L -CD
1010
, IERALD PAR
VENDOR TOTAL
258.33
".'031
44.00
TAK COUNCIL n'rc
01 4n -?1N0
3/31 / 3 1 ?1/
44. K1
.NPW•CD
1910
/0015
PADS 4 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 3/31/90
W- 602-01 CITY OF FIM TIME 14.18.32
VEA01 [MICE ME ILLD PIE -PAID am
0. INVOICE NO DATE DATE STATUS A1QW oESCRIPTIN ACCOUNT OW MW CHECK 8 DATE
NN81QD 011CK5
VENDOR TOTAL
44.00
HIM
100.80
EDUIF AFFAIR
3/31190 3/31190
100.80
,ft_cD
HAYBEII- MURPHY
VENDOR TOTAL
100.80
N2140
364.50
INSTALL SUP141RE
481.50
INSTALL SMVI- POLICE
340.44
FEIN BOOKING FQ5
3/31/90 3/31190
1,186.44
JRNL-CD
09 M SHERIFFS DEPT VEND01 TOTAL
1186.44
12160
730.55
FES BDARD
3/31/90 3/31/90
730.55
JBNL -0
09 M T EAIS✓lElt
VENDOI TOTAL
730.55
12380
75.00
IINC DUES
3131/90 3/31/90
73.00
AIL-0
DITNATI INSTITUTE MUNIC+ VEWOR TOTAL
75.00
12400
369.2B
REPAIR 11 b 15
3/31/90 3131/90
369.28
AL
ISM PART( SKELLY
VENDOU TOTAL
369.28
J2533
7.15
MAR MILE
3/31/90 3/31/90
7.15
J NL_m
JOEL W M
VENDOR TOTAL
7.15
,2600
5.30
RECYCLE MM
17.50
REIMB-EYE UNES
8.75
REIMS -EYE OLAIIE5
8.75
REIMB-ETE MAWS
3/31/90 3/31/90
40.30
JaNL-CD
ATM NELSON
VENDOR TOTAL
40.30
L2752
75.53
MAR GASOLINE
3131/90 3/31/
75.53
JFAL -CD
LABATT'S SPRING PARK SPUR VENDOR TOTAL
75.53
LZ770
4,110.75
PYMT 2-Llm
3/311 3/31/90
4,110.75
JK -CD
LAI.T MTKA CONSERVATION
Olt WW TOTAL
4110.75
L.'811
1.32
DAILY CASH REPORTS
3 /31 /a) 3'31
71.82
,Etta -CD
73-
1010
22 -4170 -3900
01- 4140 -3950
01- 4110 -42%
1010
01- 4110-150
1010
01-4040 -4130
1010
73-7300 -3810
1010
71-7100-2200
1010
01- 4270 -4120
01-4280-3140
73- 7300 -3140
78- 7800 -3140
1010
Z2 -1:10
1010
01- 4020-4130
1010
71 - 71 I.K! -:_�!+
1010
•
•
•
/aze
FADE 5
PURCHASE 10 U;NAL
DATE 3/:11
AP
CITY OF ROUND
TIME 16.18.32
VENOOIR
INVOICE DUE MAD
PRE-PAID CHECK
NO. INVOICE W
DATE DATE STATUS
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
ACMUNT NUMBER
ARM CMECY 0 DATE
O LARSON PRINTING i ORAPHICS VENDOR TOTAL
71.82
L2
15.00
MLMMC COF JESSEN
01.4020 -4110
3111M 3/311
15.00
JRML
1010
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
VENDOR TOTAL
15.00
L2$80
180.3:
COILEX REIMP- HARRELL
01-4140-4110
3/31/90 3/31/90
180.32
JRML -CD
1010
LEONARD MWFIRELL
VENDOR TOTAL
189.32
L1116
30.15
FRAME FOR WINDOW
=- 4110-: 40
3/31/90 3/31 /90
30.15
JRIL-CD
1010
LOUIS GILBERTSON
VENDOR TOTAL
30.15
L2
200.00
BLANK SIGNS
01-4280 -2360
3/31/90 3/31190
200.00
JUL-CD
1010
LTLE SIGNS, INC
YENS TOTAL
:00.40
POD30
3,462.30
MAR BEER
71-1100-9530
3/31/ 3131/
3,462.30
JRML-CD
1010
MARX VII DISTRIBUTOR VENDOR TOTAL
3462.30
31,8`6.39
APR SEWER SERVICE
78-7800-4:.!0
�M0170
9, 416.51-
APR SEWER SEP "cl
78-1190-0040
477 .48 -
APR SEWER SERVICE
78- 3812 -0000
3/3!190 3/31/9.0
21,'x02.44
JRML-CO
1010
METRO WASTE CONTROL
COIMI• VENDOR TOTAL
21
MM3187
11.25
10 PHOTOS
01-4040-2100
15.00
ID PHOTOS
01-4090-2100
7.50
ID PHOTOS
01-4190-2100
3.75
ID PHOTOS
01 -4340 -2100
18.75
ID PHOTOS
01- 4280 -2100
15.00
?D PlOTOS
73 -7300 -1100
11.25
10 PHOTOS
78-78^'+ -2100
7.50
ID PHOTOS
71-7100-2100
73.56
10 PHOTOS
22-4170-2140
3/31/90 3/31!90
163.54
JRML-CD
1010
MICHELLE LOVISE PHOTOGRAPH VENDOR TOTAL
163.56
2.`.00
BODTS
78- 7800 -220M'
3131/ 3/31/V
85.00
•.'RML-CU
101
MID- CENTRAL, INC
',SEW TG'AL
'`, y'
M :71
?'."
PVIF CELLLLAP TELE
73 73M r:
M{,F 1 -LI.AF 'E.E
01 - 41 40 -??;q
4
:ELU14 'ELE
:41 -?n)
/ 027
PAGE 6
PURCNAEE JOURNAL
DATE 3,31/
AP CO2 - 01
CITY OF MMOM
TIME 16.19.3:
VE1w�m INVOICE DUE HOLD
PRE -PAID CHECK
MO. IMIOICE NO DATE DATE STATUS
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
ACC3lA►' W%P
AMOUNT DIEM I DATE
0 CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO VENDOR TOTAL
7 2.87
1010
40.00
"CIA US
Ol-&C C -41V
3/31" 3131190
40.00
JOL -CD
:010
RN CITY MONT ASSN VENDOR TOTAL
400
R3:B9
101.00
GLAD ALVE,HMiM
22- 4170- = ?0
3131190 3/311
101.00
J _CD
1010
0 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY VEYlOQM TOTAL
101.00
KM43
:0.00
AN STATE SHERF ASSN ODES
01 -4140 -4130
3131/90 3/31/90
20.00
JOL-0
10 :0
MN STATE SHERIFF'S ASSN VENDOR TOTAL
20.00
10470
44.00
PATER ANALYSIS
73-7300 -3100
3/31 /90 3!31 /90
44.00
JX-M
1010
IN VILIFY TESTING LAKIRATO VENDOR TOTAL
44.00
113490
5,209.00
MAR SALARIES
x-4170 -17
1,000.00
MAR MINI'
22- 4170.3190
653.30
PAR DRILLS
22-4170 -11W
3/31/90 3/31/90
6,863.50
JK -CD
1010
ROUND FIRE DEPARTMENT VENDOR TOTAL
6863.50
R35M
5,359.00
W FIRE RELIEF PENSION
95-9'500 -100
3/31/90 3/31/90
5,359.00
ik-CD
1010
ROUND FIRE RELIEF ASSN VDW TOTAL
5359.00
Rm10
364.00
PHYSICAL-SEPPRELL
3/31190 3/31/
364.0n
JML-CD
1010
Mw MEDICAL CLINIC YEW TOTAL
364,00
N3680
75.00
NFPA MM
22- 4170.4130
3/3i/90 3/31/90
75.00
JIMI -CD
1010
MTL FIRE PROTECTION ASSN VENDOR TOTAL
75.00
113790
141.01
DRILL SET, PLIERS
01 ;`Cry
3131/90 3/31/90
141.01
JNL.
1010
NORTHERN 41"FA11105 VENDOR TOTAL
141. 1
P4000
:30.31'
MWR Mll
11 •;!r.t4r,
2' *. 3 i
J+ML •CP
l
PEPSI.OULA IOMfANY VENDS T0
C4(Vj(1
' , .y .. �`
'ti�A I+E't �
� 1 • -: i �` .'f
•
•
•
/ozI
`
c�RC►,a5E
j0uFwaL
DATE ?3ir
Af'CO2.O1
CITI IT MOl1ND
TIME Sh.18.32
VE7m
INVOICE DUE ►Q9
PR -PAID Dfa
40. INVOICE NO
DATE DATE STAN
MN'
I(SCFIPTION
ACf5JN7 Np%p
AlKw DIED 1 DATE
0
31 3lloo
',3x):.
JPT& -CO
1°10
PODAESA DIS TRIE4. 1 1ING CO VENDOR TOTAL
R4209
104.5'
ow GARPAfE
X1.4. 2^-37`4
RANDT'S SMITATION
VENDOR TOTAL
1J4. 7
84290
.1!'0.^4
W ASST C41EF SALARY
.•
r.•JO
JP% -CD
1010
numu Nwwol
%VW TOTAL
200 1 M
04290
124.30
MAR' ICE
7 1 ' I nn x`.40
3/31/90 1 /31/ 2 7
124.90
JRNL•CD
1010
NON'S ICE COWANT
VENDOR TOTAL
124.90
54352
133.50
CMAFIOIS
22 4170 .12.4
3/31/90 3/31/
133.50
JRNL -
1010
SANIT PROWS COWMY VEW TOTAL
1? ?.%
54370
9 8.85
5,6,7 1QSP 1 MUSE
01- 4.1E-0-1510
286.50
S,b,7 HO9 J "Am
01.4.
3/31/90 3/31/90
385.35
PL-CD
1010
9 ME
VENDOR TOTAL
X5.35
5030
2.00
FAX CHG
01-1114 22M
311/90 311/90
2.40
JFW -CD
1010
SOS FoliffING
%VW TOTAL
2.70
S4590
31.K:
REPAIR LITE
11 1- 1300-4.
31.
REPAIR LITE
7 8-7800-1204
31.
REPAIR LITE
01-4'.W-4200
3!31/ 3i311�0
9 `.7`
JR►E -CD
1010'
S'ER1E GZTRIC CO
VENDOF TOTAL
t 1s
54600
1`.75
we
nI.4144 -2270
3/31 3/31/
15.75
Jot -CD
1010
STICOE11'S
VENDOF TOTAI.
15.7
S410
-'V. , 4
T1' '[S
:4;40 2310
:RES
c Y, -101
. +t .'�
.. "ss,..
tY. "D
,•qtr,
0 !RA" TIFF CG • '-
A" ss,;
/o Z 9
:41 `
PURCHASE 10UFNAI
DATE 3,'?:
AF CO2
CITY OF 0440
TIME 16.18.32
VENDOTI
INVOICE ME HOLD
PRE - PAID CIM
NO. INVOICE NO
DATE DATE STATUS
AMM
fESCR1PTIUN
ACCOUNT NUMER
AMOINT DIED( 1 DATE
t4'lti
119.00
TEMP HELP
01 x'70 I?00
?/ ?11°0 si31;
119.00
.IRNL -CD
1010
*E?PORAPIES TO OD
VEtW TOTAL
119.00
T4'M
31.91
FILM
ir1 41
11.16
FILM
01-4140 ::00
36.9
FILM
-4110 2
3!311 3/31!90
95.71
JNL_CD
1010
THRIFTY SN►DER ORUG NO4 YEW TOTAL
95.71
T48N
42.10
ENT- LIMOND
01-4140-4110
3/31/90 3/31190
42.50
JINL-CD
1010
TODD LIMOID
VOW TOTAL
42.50
T4
47.64
MAR MIT
71-7100-
3/31!90 1 /31 /90
47.64
J*
1010
THIN CITY NK ,MICE CO VENDOR TOTAL
47.64
V5181
50.12
HEADLAMPS
01- 4290 -:300
11.9
FLUORESCENTS
01- 4190 -;00
31311% 3/31190
132.2!
ift-CO
1010
VAN 0 LITE, INC.
VOW TOTAL
132.29
V5240
14.36
MINGS
78- 7800 -M
3/31/90 3/31/90
14.56
JlV& - CD
1010
VILLAM OEVROLET
VENDOR TOTAL
14.51
9 N
15.0
COFFEE,VTINSELS - PW
01
3.8
PLATES
01- 4020 -1:00
.71
DISTILLED MATER
01-4310-:200
3131 / 3/31/90
20.56
JK -CD
1010
MESTONVA FOODS
VENDOR TOTAL
20.16
IM71
11.9
SERVICE BATHOOM
01- 4180 -4100
11.32
SERVICE PATW400M
13-7300-4100
11.33
SERVICE BATHROOM
78- 7800 -4;00
11.39
SERVICE BATHROOM
01- 4290 -31M
3!31! 3131/
45.30
JML-CD
IOIO
MESTONKA H>ECHVNVAL
CONTR# VENDOR TOTAL
45.30
0
104.00
NILLMST
170.00
CLEAN UVERT
3 3/311'
374.00
JW -CD
1n10
r10HER lw
VENDOF '0'AL
374.00
iF'xj
1,550.00
AF's RC'f :*;
1 r�
u
•
1 r
u
/030
CITY COUNCIL PACKET -- 4/10/90 #2
•
MAN
`,'
1010
�+ e
01-130.3100
01- p10-2200
101e
22-017'0.1310
1010
/03/
y
an OF 10
w an
mw norm
e
3m)" wl"
1,mo.00 AL-0
NM Tim
1I0.00
36.0 so mow
110.00 M M W
3/31NO 3/3/10
300.0 AL
NIA 10f1L
310.66
NXi10 31XIM
100.M in �
! "M
IWO
•
MAN
`,'
1010
�+ e
01-130.3100
01- p10-2200
101e
22-017'0.1310
1010
/03/
n
.. ... .. ......... .
.00000 00001,00,
CITY of N IOU N I )
• u� o
Y EY -5
a�s�
April 5, 1990
T0: Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Greg Bergquist
Mechanic
SUBJECT: March's Activity Report
PARKS DEPT.
This month we reconditioned 2 Parks Dept. trucks. The 1978
Chev. 1 -ton required extensive sheet metal repair and body
Work before it could be painted. The 1982 Chev. pick -up
required a replacement drivers door and box, it was then painted
the same color as the 1 -ton.
STREET DEPT.
Unit #1, 87 Chev. had complete service and repacked front
wheel bearings. We serviced and made required repairs to both
sweepers.
SEWER - & - WATER
Unit 9 a 1985 Chev. I -ton needed new shocks and servicing.
Unit 21, 88 Chev. 5 -10 So: new front tires and a front -end
alignment.
POLICE
842, 88 Chev. spotlight , new battery and 4 new tires.
•
/03 a,
9�
h
C IT 'N " (A 1 iOl_`N
April 5, 1990
TO: Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Geno Hoff
Street Supt.
SUBJECT: March's Activity Report
The first week of the month was spent steaming out frozen storm
sewers. We haven't had this many frozen lines for a number of
hears. The reason for the problem that we had was the type
of winter. We would get alittle snow Pnd then it would warm up
and melt, run into the sewer lines and freeze, it would do this
a few times and before you know it the sewer pipe would be froze
shut.
•
The 7th it started to rain and freeze, at noon we sent out 4
truck to sand, we quite at 3:30 p.m., everything that was slippery
was sanded and was OK. I got a call from the police at midnight
and they informed me that traffic was at a standstill, because
of very icy roads. We sanded with 5 trucks till 7:00 a.m. before
we got things under control, we spred 40 loads of salt sand. The
weather service called it a Mood Old Fashion Ice Storm ".
We started to sweep the downtown sidewalks the 19th Pnd it takes
about 2 days to complete the job. We started to sweep streets the
20th. The downtown streets are first, Commerce, Lynwood, Shoreline,
Cypress, Bartlett and Wilshire. After we have cleaned the downtown
area we start the residential sweeping, starting in a different
section each year. This year we started on Island Parkand we'll
work our way clock -wise around the City. It takes about 3 to 4
weeks, depending on the weather and other work that has to be done,
to complete the spring clean -up.
io3 3
I
S 1,
SIGN WORK
7 No congregating or crusing signs, put up in parking lots
6 4 ton per axel weight restriction signs, put up the 15th
5 Stop signs replaced because of fading
4 No parking
2 street sign names
CEMENTERY
Staked out 2 graves and stones. We also cleaned up the dumping
area.
We had a watermain break Sunday the 25th which took us 5 hours
to repair.
•
•
/Oil d/
C:IT1'(A
April 5, 1990
TO: Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Joyce
Recycling Coordinator
SUBJECT: March's Recycling
As you probably have noticed I have been putting articles in
the Laker to try to increase our recycling participation rates.
Our participation rate did increase by 166 households more
per week. February's household count was 3151, March's was
3815. I will try to continue putting in articles because I
wouldn't be satisfied until we reach 50% participation, at least.
I've been getting material ready to give to the schools so
they can educate the children on recycling. I now have 6
videos they can also use.
The Recycling Committee will be participating in the Earth
Day festivities. There will be an Earth Day Fair located
at the Depot, we will be there with recycling videos, hand -outs
and other miscellaneous things.
March's tonnage 43.85, households count 3815, 30% participation.
•
/03.1
c :ITY A N A 'NI�
March was used to prepare the park equipment for the return of
the season employees. The City's mechanics. Grey berpquIst and
Jim Johnsont al ong with the Street Department, has greatly he lped
US by painting two of the park trucks, assembling the new wesd
sprayer and by welding other equipment that has needed attention.
The Park Maintenance Shop on island Park has also been organized
and will see a complete cleaning during the scheduled spring
clean -up date in April. Currently, some improvements are being
looked into at this facility by doing much needed repairs.
Commons Dock
Of the 443 available dock sites, as of the end of March 101 sites
were not renewed. Of these 101 sites, 67 of them were deemed
unusable by the Park Department, the other 34 sites were not
renewed for other reasons, mainly due to low water.
Trier* as has also been a drop in the number of boats registered
at these sites. In 1988 there were 597 boats registered, and in
1999 there were 516 boats registered. 1990 figures will be down
from 1989 and i will have them for you in April.
1
With road restrictions being on during half of March, no tr*es
were removed, nor has there been any notices sent out to private
property owners.
The first pick -up of the cemetery was done to remove all of the
flowers and Christmas decorations that are placed there for the
holiday season. In April there will be a more intense clean -up
to get ready for Memorial weekend in May. •
/036
("AITY (A NIOLYND
April 10, 1990
TO: Ed Shukle
City !tanager
FROM: Greg Skinner
Water 6 Sewer Supt.
SUBJECT: March's Activity Report
In March we pumped 23,220,000 gallons of water. There were
3 t -off for non - payment. There was 1 watermain break. All
of our time was spent. on meter rapair and pump house maintenance.
SEWER DEPT.
The Sewer Dept. has started wetwell and filter cleaning. This
will take until May 1 to complete.
Y'
•
L _J
CITE' ()f IO ',' l )
r`�r(
5:rZ! VAYAO `C ROAD
�bt.i 4'2-'" -5
an" 4
lS"
we$
am= AND C MI coup=
PURL
i+0= �m1, vjg�B DZMCTOD J'LN
us
MOINCE FIX=I 21
Balance
March 1, 1990
$7,626,800
BOUght:
Farm Cr. 8.22 Marquette Due 9- 4 -90
350,000
CP
8.37 Marquette Due 6 -15 -90
225,239
lMIi1
8.42 Dain Due 9- 4 -90
225,000
Matured:
Farm, Cr.
Dain
(300,000)
CIP
Dain
(214,615)
CP
Dain
(169,611)
CP
Marquette
(341,886)
CP
Marquette
(225.609)
Balance
March 31, 1990
57,175.318
20DIT
The auditor's have completed their examination of the City's
records.
I prepare the worksheets, statements
and notes to the
financial
statements. This audit report will
be submitted to
GFOA for
evaluation in the Certificate of Achievement program.
The audit
report is scheduled to be presented to
the City Council
on April
24th. With both the proposed No Smoking policy and the
audit on
the same agenda, we will probably have
to set up extra
chairs in
the council chambers.
JN:ls
/057
TO: Ed Shukle
MM: Len Harrell
SUWI=: Monthly Report for March, 1990
I. STATISTICS
The police department responded to 654 calls for serv-
ice during the month of March. There were 29 Part I
offenses reported. Those offenses included 1 criminal
seuual conduct, 2 aggravated assault, 4 burglaries, 17
larcenies, 4 vehicle thefts, and i arson.
There were 74 Part II offenses reported.
fenses included 3 child abuse /neglect, 1
checks, 16 criminal damage to property,
violations, 4 liquor laws, 9 DWI, 7 simple
domestics (5 with assaults) , 12 har
runaway /truancy, and 5 other offenses.
Those of-
forgery /NSF
4 narcotics
assaults, 9
assment, 4
The patrol division issued 117 adult citations and 7
juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for
an additional 8 citations. Warnings were issued to 47
individuals for a variety of violations.
There were 3 juveniles arrested for felonies. Eighteen
adults and 7 juveniles were arrested for misdemeanors.
There were 14 warrant arrests.
The department assisted in 8 vehicular accidents; 5
with personal injuries. There were 30 medical emer-
gencies and 62 animal complaints. Mound assisted other
agencies on 17 occasions in March and requested assis-
tance 3 times.
Property valued at $10,010 was stolen and $4,882 was
recovered in March.
1038'
1
NOVND POLICE DEPARTNUT
NOPMY REPORT - WJWR, 1990
MIND yl ��
The investigators worked on 8 child protection cases
and 3 criminal sexual conduct cases. These 11 cases
a000unted for 55 hours of investigative time. There
have been 1s child protection cases reported to date.
In addition, cases involving burglary, arson, nar-
cotics, assault, theft, deprivation of parental rights,
bomb threat, criminal sexual conduct, theft of mail,
and harass.ag communications were investigated.
Formal complaints were issued in 9 cases, including
felony theft, assault, gross misdemeanor DWI, dog at
large, trespassing, and improper lane change.
III.
The department used approximately 55 hours of over -time
during the month of Rarch. Officers used 7 days of
sick time, 2 holidays, and 11 days of vacation. Of-
ficers earned 58 hours of comp -time and used 72 hours
in March.
IV. Training
Officers received 18 days of outside training plus
defensive tactics in- house. The training included
canine training, defensive driving, EMT refresher,
defensive tactics, and the spring chief's conference.
IV. Police Reserve
The police reserves donated a total of 302 hours to the
department in March. Six officers graduated from the
Hennepin County Auxiliary Officer's Course.
0 2
/,03
Y. A`
SE+r
�
Vr:
OWED "LICE RESERVE$
MNT /lT /011Ri
MAACM, Igoe
EMER
toe.
COMM
N/f TRAIN
INSTR
210E
MEET
C/0
i010A0
SIRV
GALL IMO
TION
ALONG
AOMin
I/$
TMTA;
1 -
- -
-
16.5
30.f
4.0
f ►.`'
4 5.0
1.0
11.3
f 4.0
16.5
2.0
- 12.0
-
12.5
3.5
2.0
fit.
10
11
-
e.0
-
i.f
♦.
i s
-
-
13 g.S
1.6
2.0
- 32.S
-
4.5
-
1.S
So.
14
- -
S.0
-
-
-
S.
16
9.0
17
23 -
-
- -
-
-
1.5
1.
t0
6.S
-
- O.S
S6 5.0
6.6
2.0
- 11.0
-
S.0
e.5
1.S
g.
so 4.0
2.0
- 31.0
f7
s•
TOTAL 27.5
31.0
0.6
0 106.0
14.0
51.0
$0.5
13.5
302.
11041 1ILT ACTIVITIEO
11
Nelson
Rib
Rawks
Mann. Roserve School
24
Fleming
117
ReAmon
Emergency Coll Out*
IS
FOR
all
Vogel
Car Maintenance
110
Swanson
120
love"
Meeting
R11
Remain
256
fox, R.
CPR Instruction
412
$hell
459
jazowski
Court
113
Larson
114
iueearo
In
Training
K.
Larson
R.
Jszowski
��
1
TOTALS
ci /sk
ter:.
fVl"
µ
r: c
4F
MOUND POLICE RESERVES
SEVERENCE ACCOUNTS
MARC*. 1990
DEPOSIT BALANCE
$13.00 $409.06
0 490.50
0
gf i<U
OWt*% Nooks
6.SO
Rot% Vesel
0
272.00
0
stove cebsen
19.SO
156.00
0
Sherry tvccere
0
save Nelsen
13.00
John Remain
0
Jett Fleming
19.50
Makike Swanson
Tee Beyen
Jis FOR
Oastfen SAell
catle FOR
TOTALS
ci /sk
ter:.
fVl"
µ
r: c
4F
MOUND POLICE RESERVES
SEVERENCE ACCOUNTS
MARC*. 1990
DEPOSIT BALANCE
$13.00 $409.06
0 490.50
0
104.00
6.SO
156.90
0
272.00
0
149.00
19.SO
156.00
0
6.SO
0
52.00
13.00
65.00
0
39.00
19.50
104.00
S 71.50 $2,010.00
2
/N/
4
z
• • O O O • O •
O O O w o o l- 0
• 0 0 • O d u o
0 0 0 0 @-• O
0
M • O N O O �- 0 0 0 O M O O s
O O O• O M J • O- O O O O O N
N 0 0 0 M r P 0 O O M O O N
N O E M 0 0 0• .O M O N- N O O 1
N � O O O q- o o o o o o 0 o 0 o
A
EM
P
N
0
O
r.
J
N
J
e-�
M O
C r
O
M
•
V
0
L
6
A
_C
too
may .•: 4 '�'
S t�"
•
•
L
Noun ' POLICS OZP MT
calms ACTIVITY UPORT
KMM 1090
M
l4 ((g
^
1
.r
Si
a
"is
Tau TO
TA" TM
SAL At"!MTY emomY
mown
DA22
TO DA22
Masardous Citations
76
233
177
Yon Masardous Citations
25
63
67
Aasardous Warnings
8
39
23
Non- Masardous Warnings
33
122
a s
Verbal Warnings
148
375
310
Pw*ing Citations
6
114
206
M
9
19
to
Over .10
4
14
11
Property Damage Accidents
3
11
37
Personal Injury Accidents
5
10
9
Petal Accidents
0
0
0
Adult Felony Arrests
4
17
4
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests
28
93
66
Adult Misdemeanor Citations
8
17
13
Juvenile Felony Arrests
3
7
2
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests
7
11
5
Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 1
4
3
Part I Offenses
29
70
37
Part II Offenses
74
169
134
Medicals
30
64
77-
Animmal Complaints
62
154
18 4.
Other Public Contacts
431
1,233
1,500
TOTAL
966
2,839
2
Assists
41
79
107
Follow-ups
12
47
84
Bonn. County Child Protection
3
9
12
Mutual Aid Given
17
42
44
Mutual Aid Requested
3
20
23
1
.r
Si
a
,7 .
�
1
ARM
an
S •...
Aft
9
0
0*0 tuft .10t Bii1C
4
0
Orirrinq
0
0
g
� � . or am.
l0
0
iit die
4
0
lriq
01
4
No Ol• or SwIrod, O
2
0
mw*riotiaA an IDL
1
0
mar, mired, or go Plates
9
0
111001 Parsing
0
0
ftor _sign Violations
2
1
#litre to Y i14
1
1
tipsent Violations
0
0
Umving the same
0
0
me Insurance
2
0
Illegal or unsafe Turn
0
0
Over the Centerline
0
0
Parking Violations
8
0
Crosswalk
2
0
Dog ordinances
0
0
Derelict Autos
0
0
Seat Belt
12
1
MV /ATV
2
0
Miscellaneous Tags
g
0
/Ow
•
•
MOVED POLICS DRIARTl1NT M O11T1[Li R=PORT
MUM 1!!0
So Insurance
ADULT
18
Traffic
9
Mpipment
9
Crosswalk
0
Animals
4
Trash /Derelict Autos
1
Seat Belt
0
Trespassing
0
Miscellaneous
3
Zp'1'Ay
84
mum
Felony Warrants 4
Misdemeanor Warrants 10
0
0
A 9V.1
k�.
�s
�Y
<n
l
2
0
1
0
0
A 9V.1
f ti��Y
9 'I" +J
nanny MnwPUM LOSS/ ams"T
1190
SWIMMMM
Ilk"
Snowmobiles
Seat*, Motors, Trailers
Clothing
Currency, Not es, Etc.
Jewelry i Precious Metals
buns
Bass Furnishings
Radio a Electronic Equipment
Vehicles i Vehicle Equipment
Miscellaneous
T022L
1
= 200
$ as
0
240
0
0
277
277
786
0
3,000
3.000
0
0
0
0
90
0
4,660
1,000
997
280
$10
$ 4,862
•
1000
RUNz 2•AM -M
USES
IS ISN'S ONLYT NO
TIVITY CODES: All
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09000
SPEEDING
09001
J- SPEEDIn
09002
0 DA, EXPIRED *A
09001
RESTRICTED 0/l
09006
TEST REFUSAL
09010
SAC OVER .10
09012
OPEN BOTTLE
09014
STOP $10
MIS
J - STOP SIGN
s�
INSTALLATION 010E -• W= POLICE DEPARTMENT PMOD t
z
�
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS IT PATROL AREA
02/26/90 YOU 03/2S/90
-- - _ -•-...PATROLAREAS - - - - - • - - - - -
10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 00 90 TOTAL
9 1S
FAILURE TO YIELD
7
J- FAILURE TO YIELD
09030
CROSUALK VIOLATION
09033
NV /ATV STREETS•PARKS
09040
NO SEATBELT
09041
J -NO WIDELY
09100
PAAKING/ALL OTHER
09140
NO PARKINGNINTER NOURS
09200
OAS/IW/DAC
09210
PLATES /NO•INPROPER- EXPIRED
09220
NO INSURANCE /PROOF OF
09309
FOUND /RUNAMAT
09312
FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS
09313
FOUND PROPERTY
s�
INSTALLATION 010E -• W= POLICE DEPARTMENT PMOD t
z
�
ENFORS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS IT PATROL AREA
02/26/90 YOU 03/2S/90
-- - _ -•-...PATROLAREAS - - - - - • - - - - -
10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 00 90 TOTAL
9 1S
10
9
10
2
1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3 4
1
4
1
1 1
3
2
1
4
3
3
1 1
2
4
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
3
S3
4
2
1
3
i
4
2
1
t
2
2
12
t
7
1
,0
9
2
1
4
5
10V-7
' 4 .
PRIMARY ISN#$ ONLY* NO
ACTIVITY COMES: ALL
INSTALLATION sm -- IONNI POLICE DEPARTMENT
E0FORS
CAMS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS IT PATROL AREA
02/26/90 THOU 03/25/90
ACT
COME ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
01630 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS
09650 PROF TV WOW ACCIDENTS
DUST On PROPIATY OMNGE ACC.
09361 000 NITS
01563 006 AT LARGE
09710 ATTEMPTED SUICIDE
09720 SUBM DEATNS/DODIES FOU1N1
09730 NEOICALS
09731 DETON- MESICALS
09732 CRISIS INT.- NEDICALS
01000 ALL OTNER/INICLASSIFIED
09001 DOMESTIC/ND ASSAULT
09900 ALL NCCP CASES
09906 OPEN OOOR/ALARIK
09930 NANDOUN APPLICATION
09950 INTELLIGENCE
09900 WARRANTS
09990 RISC. VIOLATIONS
09992 MUTUAL AID /8100
DOM MUTUAL AID /6500
09994 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER
099% MUTUAL AID /NARCOTICS
A5302 ASLT S- WtICTS ATTEMPTS KRM -UNK YEA- ADLT -ACO
- - - - - - - - - -
PATROL AREAS
. .... . . .. .
10
20
30
40
50 60
70 80 90
TOTAL
4
1
3
2
1
3
1
1
2
1
1
3
3
1
2
1
1
3
7
9
1
3
23
2
3
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
2
S
1
1
2
4
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
2
1
3
1
1
1
3
6
1
1
6
1
1S
1
1
1 O
9
4
4
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
•
Of
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY OE3tRIPTiON
INSTALLATION 1111E -• MMNa POLICE UP11RUM
ENfamS
CALLS F - SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS IT PATROL AREA
02126/90 TUN 03/25/90
3
'.4ad
- - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - -
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL
AS3S1
ASLT 5- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS MN- NAM -AOLT -FAN
2
2
1
S
ASIR
MY S- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS MIL - HANDS - AOLT - ACS
1
1
AS355
ASLT S- INFLICTS AnJM MN- MHOS- CNLO -ACL
3
1
4
ASSN
AM.T 5-TM WILY NRIN-W IEAP•CKO-ACS
1
1
A9502
'.UDR -TIM IMFLT 011-I11K LEAP -ADLT -ACS
1
1
A%60
TERNM -TART INFLT PRO OM-ENPLO INCEN -UNK RELAT
1
1
83494
01116 3 -UNOCC NES NO FRC -U-UK IEAP-COI THEFT
1
1
2
037%
MMS 3 -UNOCC IDES FRC•U -LAME LEAP -COI THEFT
1
1
84060
MIRQ 4-AT FRC MS-N-M LEAP -UNK ACT
1
1
ORU II -110 2 NM NANO- POWSS- AMPIIET -tW CHAR
1
1
6215
ARSON 1- MIIIM•90 IEA-26 RES10 -5294 LESS
1
1
13050
CRIN AONST FAN- NS•CNTRIS TO 0E1.110-MEQ OF MINOR
1
1
13060
CRIM AGNST FAN-NS-MEGLECT OF A CHILD
1
1
2
J2500
TRAFFIC-GN -DRIVE LIM INFLUENCE Of LIQUOR
1
1
1
3
J2700
TRAF- ACCID-OR- AGGRAVATED VIOLATION
2
2
MOD
TRAF- ACCIO-NS-ORIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
1
3
4
K6004
DEPRIVE OF PARENTAL RIGNTS•UNK WW -CNLO -FAN
1
1
2
17/71
CSC 4 -00 FK-ACRAINT -18 OLDER -F
1
1
NM
ANENILE-OASITUAL TRUANT
3
3
94199
LIQUOR - OTHER
1
3
4
N5350
RMUW►Y
1
'
96501
DRAG PARAPNERNALIA-POSSESSION
1
1
1
3
NMI
FALSELY IMPERSONATING ANOTHER
1
1
f �
�J
/tov9
0-
NwC 2 -NM-M
Cnb
PRININT URNS at" NO
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL
INSTALLATION NRE -- MM POLICE O pill gINT
..... .
ENFO1S
CALLS FOR EIVICE
ACTIVITT ANALYSIS BY PATROL AEA
WWII TINNI OSM/"
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY SESCRITTION
N3O3O GIST= PEACE- 16-/1SO ook Cole=
03110 OISTHTt mm- n-NRRRRSSINN COMMUNICATIONS
03E12 O> llv -n-smm FINK CALL-AN LT
13110 FOOT oN -PA- F11wTE -M INTENT
T1O21 TEFT -1 11890-FE -FIN RNILOINS-IIONEr
T2O21 TEFT - 5231- f230O-FE-FMI 1YILOINS-NNNEr
74021 THEFT -1230 LESS- NS-M BUI DINS-000
T402O TEFT -5250 LESS-48-FIN WILDING-9111 PROP
T4O" TEFT -1100 LESS-IIS-FNN TANGS -010 F>>d
T4O61 TEFT -5230 LESS-INS-FIN MIL -NONET
T4ON TEFT -5250 LESS-NS-FW VAIL-GIN PROP
T41" THEFT -SM LESS -NS -FIN 11070 YENICLE-OTM PMW
T41/1 TEFT -230 LESS- NS-FRII OTNER -OTM PROP
03016 TNEFT -NS -ST CECK-523O LESS
03416 TNEFT- 0- 81CTCLE-11O ND101-250 LESS
V1021 YEN TEFT -FE-OM 52500 -AUTO
72021 YEN TEFT- FE-5231 -:2300 -AUTO
V2022 . TEFT -FE- 5251 - 52500- TM= - Wi
REPORT TOTALS:
. -
.........
PATROL AEAS .. . ....... .
10
E
30
40
50 6S 70 10 10
TOTAL
1
1
2
2
4
1
3
10
1
1
2
2
2
6
3
3
16
i
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
43
53
76
82
57 3 5 a 5
332
C�
/Qjo
!7
/0/
look 1-m-0 INSTALLATION 100111 1110111
POLICE 9001111114
OLT? a
1 0 F 0
2 S
� IN'S
ITION P 5 - 1 ALL
IVITY COIFS: ALL
OFFENSE ACTIVITY IT DISPOSITION
ORIS: ALL
02/264" Toll
03/2s/90
---------------- OFFENSES CLEARED --.............I
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES
ACTUAL
- - - - OT ANEST ....
IT
TOTAL
plow
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED
....................................................................................................................................
OFFENSES
PENDING
ADULT
ANEVILE
EXCEPTION
CLEAN
CLEARED
A5302 1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
101.0
AS►I S-INFLICTS ATTWTS 1110-M WA-AOLT-ACO
As3s1 t
0
4
0
1
0
3
4
100.0
ART S-INFLICTS ATTSIM 11110-10184-AlLT4114
A539 1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
100.0
ART S-IWLIaS ATT111PTS MN-IMS-AlLT-ACIN
A53SS 4
0
4
1
0
0
3
3
75.0
ASLT S-INFLICTS ATTOWS 11IN-WINDS-ONS-AC11
ASM 1
0
1
0
0
a
1
1
100.0
ART S-TMT MILT NARK -UNK WEAP-CIN.O-AC0
A"Oz 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
11111101-TOT IWLT ON-UK NEAP-AKT-AC0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
100.0
loo-TOT IWFLT M ON-Wto INCEN-UNK RELAT
834% 2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
.0
OUNG 3-UlIOCC KS no FK-U-UK VEA► -CON TNEF(
13794 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
DUNG 3-11 MCC llK$ FK-U-UK WP-CON TNEFT
04060 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
SUNG 4-AT FRC NKS-N-UK LEAF -UNK ACT
04570 1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
M=-SCN 2 NO NARC-POSSESS-AN►NET-Ullt CNAR
V1215 1
0
t
1
0
0
0
0
.0
ARSON 1-UNINO-00 UEA-SG RESID-S299 LESS
13M 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
CAIN AGNST FM-N$-CNTRIN TO DELMO-NEG OF NINON
13060 2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
CAIN AGNST FAN-NS-NEGLECT OF A CNILD
J2500 3
0
3
0
3
0
0
3
100.0
TRAFFIC-ON-DRIVE UNDO INFLUENCE OF LIOUM
/0/
IchZ
11W -APR -M INSTALLATION NAME •- 111111110 POLICE NEPARTIENT
Pl1NARY loss ONIYT 0
E N F O R S
013POSITION COTES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL
OFFENSE ACTIVITY
IT DISPOSITION
Oil: ALL
02/26/90 YOU O3/2S/9O
/ ---------------- OFFENSES
CLEARED
................/
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES
ACTUAL
.... IT ARREST - - --
ST
TOTAL
PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED 1AIFOUNOED
.........---•---• ....................................................................................
OFFENSES
PENDING
ADULT
ANENILE
EXCEPTION CLEARED
...............................
CLEARED
.12700 2
0
2
0
2
0
0
2
100.0
TRAF•ACCIO- ON•AGININATED VIOLATION
j3'i01 4
0
4
0
3
1
0
4
100.0
TRAF- ACCID -NS -MIME IRNiER INFLUENCE OF LIOIM
s
96M4 2
0
2
0
1
0
1
2
100.0
DEPRIVE OF PARENTAL RIGNTS -URN MW- CNLO-FM
LrI?r 1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
Cat 4 -0 FRC-ACOIRINT-16 OLDER -F
N3003 3
0
3
0
0
3
0
3
100.0
AWENILE-IWITIAL TRUANT
N6199 4
0
4
0
3
1
0
4
100.0
LIOM - OTNER
053S0 1
0
1
0
3
0
1
1
100
RMIAUAY
N6S01 3
0
3
0
3
0
0
3
100.0
DRUG PARAPIERNALIA- POSSESSION
NMI 1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
100.0
FALSELY IMPERSONATING ANOTNER
N3030 2
0
2
0
0
0
2
2
100.0
OISTURO PEACE-NS•D130RDERLY CONDUCT
N3190 9
0
9
7
0
0
2
2
22.2
OISTUM PEACE- M- NARRASSING C01 RAICATIONS
03112 2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
.0
OSSENITT•NS-OlSCENE PHONE CALL -AMIIT
P3110 15"
0
1S
11
0
1
3
4
26.6
PROP DAMAGE- PS-PRIVATE•UNK INTENT
T1021 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT -MORE $BOO - FE -FRN WILDING -HONEY
T2021 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT- 1251- 12S00•FE-FIN NUILDING °MONEY
IchZ
REPORT TOTALS 9S 4 91 42 17 a 24 49 53.8
I s
/003
: R-Stt
INSTALLATION Ma -• 000m POLICE OEMRMNT
P
IINOS OIL" a
E N F 0 R S
ITION ODES: ALL
E
IVITY DOSES: All
OFFENSE ACTIVITY
IT DISPOSITION
01O1 ALL
02/26/90 TNRU 03/25/90
/----------
------ OFFENSES
CLEARED
................./
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES
ACTUAL
....
BY ARREST....
IT
TOTAL
PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED
.................................................•----•----..........--------•------•----............
OFFENSES
PENDING ADULT
JUVENILE
EXCEPTION
...............................
CLEARED
CLEARED
T4O0
2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
.0
TNEFT•SM LESS- 111-F1N MALOINS -N N EY
T4O29
2
0
2
1
0
0
1
1
50.0
THEFT -WO LESS -M -M BUILDING-OTN PROP
T4059
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT -5250 LESS-46-FM TAM-OTN PROP
T4O61
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
100.0
THEFT -SBO LESS -NS-FM NAIL-NONEY
T4069
2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
.0
TNEFT -5250 LESS -11840 NAIL -OTN PROP
T41"
S
0
S
3
0
0
2
2
40.0
6' $30 LESS-1134114 NOTOR VENICLE-0111
PROP
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
TNEFT -250 LESS-NS-FM OTNER -OTN PROP
U3O16
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
100.0
TNEFT-NS-11 CNECK -5250 LESS
U34%
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT- NS- IICYCLE -NO NOTON -250 LESS
V1021
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
VEN TNEFT -FE -OVER 52500 -AUTO
V2021
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
100.0
VEN THEFT -FE- 5251- US00-AUTO
V2022
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
100.0
YEN TNEFT•FE- 5231- S2500-TMXX -lUS
REPORT TOTALS 9S 4 91 42 17 a 24 49 53.8
I s
/003
April 4, 1990
CITY ()f INIOLT -N
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: CITY CLERK
RE: MARCH MONTHLY REPORT
4�ep
There were two City Council meetings in March. Agendas and eight
resolutions for these meetings were prepared. There were 10
resolution and 2 ordinance amendments from these meetings.
The following items were some of the highlights of the month:
- We had the bid opening for the 1990 Seal Coat Program.
- We had a bid opening for the new fire /rescue apparatus and
equipment.
- There was a meeting with Hennepin County on the new State
voter registration system. This could prove to be a real
disaster because the State system does not have the
capabilities of the County system. We have already found a
number of items that could cause problems.
- Publication of legal notices, ie. new ordinances, etc.
- 3 cemetery lots were sold and there were 2 burials.
- Prepared and submitted some amendments to the Cemetery
Ordinance to the City Attorney for review.
- Submitted several easements on tax forfeit property to
Hennepin County for their approval.
- Microfilmed the Council packets from March.
- Prepared and submitted the forms for the CDBG funds to
Hennepin County.
- Attended the Minnesota Clerk's & Fij,ance Officers'
Association Annual Conference in Brainerd, Minnesota.
/05 V 1
CITY of N lOL',N 1)
APRIL 3, 1990
T03 X&JOR, CITT l=sR AND CODICIL
K
Hain: JOSL RRUla, LIQUOR BTOR2 NANAfi=1t ,,
REi APRIL 2, 1990
March's weather came in like a lamb and went out like a Is".
But not our sales, oh no. Quite the opposite as a matter-'et.,
fact. We saw the beginning of the month come in growling and'Abe'
end of the month go out roaring! Sales for the month wer* ; ►
impressive $78,435. That is $9,134 more than March of 1989..
. the first quarter of the year, sales are $206,538. That c
to last year at this time when we were at $187,469. Our R
count is also ahead of last year. To date, we have had 20
customers compared to 19,700 last year.
Other news to report on is that the number of dishonored checks
at this point in time is minimal. I have only one check in the
amount of $10 that I have not been able to collect. I don't want
you to get the wrong idea, however. We still are getting our
fair share of N.S.F. and account closed checks. We have simply
been very fortunate when it has come to people submitting their
remittances. Knock on wood.
I have had to put a part time help wanted ad in the newspaper.
One of our employees, Mary Sybrant, gave me her notice,
indicating that with working a full time job, going to school and
meeting family needs, it is difficult for her to juggle all these
responsibilities all at once. This is too bad for us because
Mary has been such an exceptional employee. It will be hard to
fill her shoes. She wants to come back this summer once school
is over. I hope to find a place for her at that time.
JK:ls
loss
NOM, MiesMMA
r �ww� •;:
TtJlt IIOMI't �
lIAIICN 1990
kt'.
nat flaff RB
+4
•
1
mm
m � m A/. .
!n?AL
sym
�*�.
mu
'.
19.00
0
1 38.00
6
228.00
jdt
X
X
2
19.00
2
27
6.00
162.00
X
X
2
19.00
0
38
6
228.00
J. WAUCPAMP
E
x
1
9.50
2
21
6.00
126.00
J A-
x
x
!
19.00
123
6.On
138.00
m >`
X
X
2
19.00
0
23
6.50
149.50
M•. S
9.00
600
.00
r. {.
X
X
19.00
2
is
90.OD
b .
J'•n
X
X
19.00
1
38
6.00
228.00
*
X
x
2
19.00
2
11
66.00
19.00
1
30
6.00
180.00
BRICON
M=
X
X
!
19.00
4
24
6.00
44.00
6.00
'
X
x
19.00
1
21
26.00
x
X
!
19.00
2
31
6.00
86.00
•
X
X
=
19.00
2
2S
6.00
50.00
122
.
X
X
19.00
1
18
6.00
08.00
Y x'
X
t
.9.50
2
6
32.00
•
2
lb
6.01
%.00
#•
x
X
2
19.00
0
26
62.
x
J. t11N1DS
X
X
2
19.00
2
25
6. �0
50.00
. 00
6
44
h ,.
ki
x
0
1
9.50
0
22
6.00
132.00
A. orm
X
X
!
19.00
2
17
6.00
102.00
?AIM
9-on
2
26
6.00
X
X
2
19.00
2
35
6.00
210.
X
X
2
19.00
6
31
6.00
186.00
X
X
2
19.00
8
21
126.00
4
6.00
X
x
2
9.00
84
23
6.00
138,00
It • ITIt I"
X
X
2
19.00
2
20
6. 00
120.00
T. smsom
x
X
2
19.00
1't
25
6.00
150.00
X
X
2
19.00
lk
18
6.00
108.00
X
X
2
19.00
26;
17
A Aft
102.00
6.00
K. SIPPRELL
X
X
2
19.00
2
29
6.00
74.00
35
34
69
555.50
102
B65
208.00
F37!t
85 JT72h
MINT
000,00
/P. YAO
DRILLS
$6863.50
TOTAL
4.
wM1
L
•
a .
,M
�w4
t
�
w
'a
Y �e
'!r;�
MONTH OF
_
'MIS
IIONTII
1
118MtN
7 111,
.. y; .
:�`
N0. OF CALLS
MOUND -
FIRE
9
2
=`.
EMERGENCY
__ lo
4 1
37
N'TONKA !EACH -
FIRE
0
2
2
EMERGENCY
0
0
0
MINNETRISTA -
FIRE
4
2
6
EMERGENCY
0
3
4'
ORONO -"
FIRE
6
1
11
two
EMERGENCY
0
3
6
SHOREWOOD -
FIRE
0
b
0
0
EMERGENCY
0
0
0
O
SPRING PARK -
FIRE
2
2
7
3
EMERGENCY
3
4
7
8
MUTUAL AID -
FIRE
EMERGENCY
0
0
0
0
_
TOTAL FIRE CALL
44
35
AL EMERGENCY CALLS
4 '
COMMER
2
3
4
RESID ENTIAL
7
23
25
INDUSTR
0
0
1
1
PASS t MISCELLANEOUS
7
O
11
4
AUTO
2
0
3
5
FA LS E ALARM'
3
0
3
0
NO. OF HOURS - MOUND
FIRE
184
99
452
304
364
150
717
602
EMERGENCY
548
249
1169
906
TOTAL
0
40
40
50
- MTKA 6CH
FIRE
0
0
0
0
EMERGENCY
0
40
40
50
TOTAL
67
43
110
247
-M'TRISTA
FIRE
n
rba
121
is
EMERGENCY
67
In2
231 °
zu
TOTAL
- ORONO
FIRE
137
A06
30D
n
131
16
EMERGENCY
137
73
537
316
TOTAL
- SHOREWOOD FIRE
EMERGENCY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
AR
InR.
MR
5A
-SP. PARK
FIRE
im
166
ul
EMERGENCY
III
2m
414
TOTAL
- MUTUAL AID
FIRE
0
0
0
EMERGENCY
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
. 1 72h
165
510
440
TOTAL ORAL HOURS
T OTAL EMERGENCY HOURS
744
TOTAL FIRE HOURS
_
43§
314
1 1256
919
TOTAL FIPE G E MERGENCY HOURS
afis
673
2391
1663
'.i � err �,,•�
..� - ..E
0
0
1
3
a .
,M
�w4
t
�
w
'a
Y �e
'!r;�
,M
A
DATE
d.;
r
s r M a /
s
J.
bran
Nelson
U.
Anderson
�Y
K '
.: t � •
Bid
4
.. J •
Palm
G.
Pederson
_ A T.
Rasmusse
.� D•
Bryce
K{
..
S.
Bryce
..
,.
.,_, D.
Carlson
W.
J.
Casey
k
S.
Collins
M.
David
r ---- -_
S.
ftickson
Erickson
'L P.
Fisk
J.
sarvais
K.
Grady
P.
Henry
C.
Henderson
G.
Johnson
_ H.
Landsman
R.
Marschke
J.
Nafus
1
A
5V
•
/E40 TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS /O:
M.
Nelson
U.
opits
a.
Pale
M.
Palm
,
__. m_,_ T.
Palm
G.
Pederson
_ A T.
Rasmusse
M.
Savage
R.
Stallman
jL T.
Swenson
W.
Swenson
R.
Williams
T.
Williams
•
/E40 TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS /O:
Ir e
�3
y t
D R I L L R E P O R T
Date: 3 -19- ' 0 0
Discipline and Team work
Critique of Fires
Pre - Plaining and Inspections
Tools i AAppparatus
Identifying
Nald Extinguisher Operation
Mearing Protective Clothinq
first Ai d and Rescue
Operation
Use of Self- Contained Masks
Note: Ho o Traininq Paid
jV Excused X Unexcused
l
Tim
Pumper operation
Fire Streams i Friction
Loss
House Burninqs
Natural i Propane Gas
talk i Demonstrations
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Rac. ) Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzle i Hose Alliance
Inhalator Operation
Q Present, Not paid
Miscellaneous: 14 Z-At
� �:9 �,f[ � /- Ca- rw�A� */� �Y►+cdu � 1 .'R /Aal�t� Ui)Pr.,t �� c��, .
O 0 .
Sx t f - 70w.
y ' Gw� va:S - A "-A ts r AMe - C• s Peal +rso. % o Rec r,ved aet/;f rwg, +C/ ah
S' -io T 9 Goiss.i, gece ;v oc/ Crrel, f lip oed c. J'3-9v
IVs lliA lq .S
fw J. Anderson as - YeMesn 'Lj- M. Nelson
- G. Anderson �- s. Erickson A Opitz
J. Babb ,�. P. Fisk � G. Pals
T��,. J. Garvais M. Pals
J. Beauchamp K. Grady T. Pals
D. Boyd 75 !}. P. Henry G. Pederson
D. Bryce —1" C. Henderson T. Rasmussen
S. Bryce G. Johnson #* II / L. M. Savagqe
1 D. Carlson B. Landsman R. 3tallman
J. Casey R. Marschke T. Swenson
S. Collins J. Nafus W. Swenson
M. David B. Niccum R. Williams
,4 T. Williams
Dr mas er
11
3
loo
DRILL R E P O R T
Date:
Tin
Discipline and Teas work
Critique of Fires
Pro•Plaining and Inspections
T4o Ident l p
Nr+Itri
r e Clothing
s AA mad Rescue
ovation
Lisa of dell-Contained Nooks
Notes MW Training Paid
Sxcused $ Unexcused
R
Pumper operation
Fire Streams i Friction
Loss
House Burnings
Natural a Propane Gas
talk i Demonstrations
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage operations —"'—
Radio operations `
now" Evolutions
Nossle i Hose Alliance
inhalator operation
Q Present, Not paid
Nisceilaneous: S Ot,;h�tt�Ie S'XS ��`S • CIt,�St tvo �
T
e ar •
a I!i ca N" . IF, l40t s 0 %
• - -90
A W 1Nwtey , g • Re 01v t d Co. t4f ? W ,*,f4 0n J.Aa •8!.
F t7a 3c
Andersen
�.
�mimYssr
G.
J.
Anderson
Babb
DRILL R E P O R T
Date:
Tin
Discipline and Teas work
Critique of Fires
Pro•Plaining and Inspections
T4o Ident l p
Nr+Itri
r e Clothing
s AA mad Rescue
ovation
Lisa of dell-Contained Nooks
Notes MW Training Paid
Sxcused $ Unexcused
R
Pumper operation
Fire Streams i Friction
Loss
House Burnings
Natural a Propane Gas
talk i Demonstrations
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage operations —"'—
Radio operations `
now" Evolutions
Nossle i Hose Alliance
inhalator operation
Q Present, Not paid
Nisceilaneous: S Ot,;h�tt�Ie S'XS ��`S • CIt,�St tvo �
T
e ar •
a I!i ca N" . IF, l40t s 0 %
• - -90
A W 1Nwtey , g • Re 01v t d Co. t4f ? W ,*,f4 0n J.Aa •8!.
Nt a -V
N. Nelson
A. opitz
� G. Pals
N. Pala
T. Pais
�} G. Pederson
, z%. T. Rasmussen
' V M. Savagqe
R. Stallsan
i - T. Swenson
W. Swenson
E R. Williams
T. Williams
rilsmaster
13
W
J.
Andersen
�.
�mimYssr
G.
J.
Anderson
Babb
S.
P.
Erickson
Fisk
J.
Garvais
J.
Beauchamp
X.
D.
Boyd
P.
Henry
D.
Bryce
C.
Henderson
i.
Bryce
G.
Johnson
D.
Carlson
B.
Landsman
J.
Casey
R.
tav
Narschke
S.
Collins
J.
Kafue
N.
David
B.
Niccum
X./L- r 5 "Peft(I
Nt a -V
N. Nelson
A. opitz
� G. Pals
N. Pala
T. Pais
�} G. Pederson
, z%. T. Rasmussen
' V M. Savagqe
R. Stallsan
i - T. Swenson
W. Swenson
E R. Williams
T. Williams
rilsmaster
13
W
1 4-
(:1 NI(A.'\l�
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 2, 1990
TO: City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff
FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official
SUBJECT: March 1990 Monthly Report
STAFFING
This will be my last monthly report for all of you. I wanted to
thank you this last time for all of your support, friendship and
concern. I am looking forward to new challenges in my position
at Richfield; however, I will miss all the people I have met in
Mound these past years.
In March we had 22 working days; Jan used one half day of vaca-
tlon and 1 -1/2 day of sick leave. Peggy used one day of vaca-
tion. The Planning Commission Meetings were March 12th and March
26th. 1 attended two City Council meetings on March 13th and
March 27th. Peggy attended one Park Commission meeting on March
8th.
We have had a two day Ice storms
tlons were initiated, which
progress.
IN SPECTIONS
in March, plus the road restric-
in -turn, slowed construction
The following inspections were conducted during the month of
March:
• Site Inspections
21
Footing Inspections
1
Framing Inspections
6
Insulation Inspections
4
Drywall lnspc-ctions
4
Final Inspections
11
Progress Inspections
14
Froslon /Grading inspections
2
House Moving /Demolition
0
'• Heating inspections
1
Plumbing inspections 1
Fire Sprinklers /Fire Code 2
Complaints 4
TOTAL 71
/m/
The above list does not Include four inspections made by the sub-
stitute inspector, nor by the electrical and plumbing inspectors.
Planning /inspections Department
March 1990 Monthly Report
Page 2
REPORTS AND PLAN REVIEWS
There were two plan reviews completed during March. The city
hall remodeling and addition was reviewed in March. Reports were
submitted to the Planning Commission, City Council, normal cor-
respondence, and inspection notices. There were 13 notices sent
out during the month of March, six of which were building /fire
code enforcement letters, and seven were for zoning code enforce-
ment, five of which were exterior storage notices.
During March, our department did a report for condemnation/
removal of a structure at 2197 Cardinal Lane.
PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission held a public hearing and forwarded in-
formation to the City Council for consideration of a rezoning and
variance application during the month. The Planning Commission
Is in the process of reviewing the Licensing and Rental Housing
Maintenance Draft Ordinance which was submitted from Curt Pearson
and myself. 0
LEGAL STATUS
During the month of March, one formal complaints was issued for a
zoning code violation at 2539 Emerald Drive, as well as three ex-
terior storage violations at 2212 Fern Lane, 5513/17 Church Road
and 2824 Longford Road.
TRAINING /MEETINGS
1 attended one Planning Commission meeting, two City Council
meetings, and a time management morning seminar with Ed Shukle
and Len Harrell conducted by the Franklin institute. i attended
a two day seminar in Maplewood sponsored by the Lake Country
Chapter and the North Star Chapter of Building Officials to study
the new Uniform Mechanical Code which is scheduled for adoption
in the next couple of months in the State of Minnesota. The
State of Minnesota Code Division will be reviewing the amendments
to the U.M.C. in their future training session conducted from
April through May.
i s
,002
0 Planning /Inspections Department
February 1990 Monthly Report
Page 3
CITY EQUIPMENT AND PURCHASES
We did some verification to find out when the new city vehicle
will be delivered, and it is tentatively set for the end of
March. The present City car had its battery replaced in March,
as well as normal maintenance.
STATISTICS OF ACTIVITIES
The total number of building permits issued in the month of March
was 18 with a total valuation of $174,650. The valuation figures
are attached on the building activity report for February.
In addition, Peggy has arranged appointments for the building and
plumbing inspectors. She has prepared the Planning Commission
and Park Commission agenda and minutes. She has issued building,
plumbing and heating permits, and typed correspondence for the
Building Official and Park Director. She has compiled monthly
and &nnual reports for building activities, Sewer Avai' ability
Charge, and U.S. Census Report.
0 • Site inspections include the review of the Planning Commis-
sion requests and requirements, site inspections for flood plain
verification, complaints and follow -up to code compliance such as
no building permit, recheck of exterior storage compliance
notices, review status of various sites for the city prosecutor,
preconstruction meetings at various sites for building permit ap-
plications, fire damage and periodic commercial inspection up-
dates.
•' The heating inspections during the construction of a project
are included under the framing and final inspection of the build -
Ing. bete heating installations mentioned are for separate equip -
ment g placed in homes and businesses.
NOTE: You do not grow old in life, unless life becomes old to
you.
•
/A3
CITY OF MOUND
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
BUILDING ACTIVITY 11g/GIIT
mwaet March ry 19"
/ov�
CONirAUCt1�N (f►wM
w
q""'IY'
loom
s
ulw,
Iq wm
1+1,0110
' e11►wr•►
1
1
107 000
2
197 000
, Yw
a swY
a ► q. g0tr
Y
TOW Feeillytk ►
1
1
107,000
2
197,000
New e10ENTlAL
,Oro A ► ireNyp
c now
i Mq1
Taw New Fe mpy
NEW NON- R[f10ENTlAL
q,�,YI
ranraw
1. A00Y0Y„
lnl raw
.w
s www wrw
a
► 4q
11Yr1Yr w
r
a
M
1
If.
M.
law
1 T ow
A1q KTE1ut101q
M
r"'*1"
Is
E1Nw,rw
I4 H,r
1 an.
1
,
f anp,.a1 a -am
2
10,000
2
► rINO►c " decks
1
'
/remodel
12
43,755 22
'
TOW Ra10NMW
�
Nr1pp�� SID
MU
%~
- ?
4 955 26
141.750
oft
►rru.,Y
wA10M
"� tMl„M ThNww
1 1,unlw euw
4 695 8
110 495
t a9;7
olow I
8,000 1
8,000
Ta►I NewRetq►Mi►1
2
'��
T OTAL►q NTN AND
YEAR rO DATE
W0,
12,695 9
Y , *
118,495
18
174,650 7 ;Z; - Jr
457,245
CONV[REN�fe 0rw,q
11,11 y �MewMI M aM W+f N4Y,10
• r•
1 yaa��Mr�q�,GrrYU,l,,,,y
ftwwO
1 1 � 1
rots Coavvo s
DE MOIITIpNE
ti010•Ml
�.w nq.(f
rw it D,N
1 aY�t001,11
W ft
Total cow4llW4
KRM,T%N 9FECT10NE, ,q
ll C N T
.
rw11�
, p
• „. W ►0q
qq 010n0
rw q 0110
TA, 110,M0 rN. q 011
e1,w�
18
37
fences /walls
4
----
^•.”
4
15
YYlyO w
0
6
13
MYM,MM
Irn■q, f r.a «r
1
4
TOTAL
4 I
81
f
r
r�
L
•
v
� M �
M tat LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
tr/pN �y� 402 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 6121473.7033
EUGENE R. STROMMEN. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SOM 111IIf1ERf
David H. Cochran, Cha
TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: APRIL 5, 1990
Greenwood
Albert O. Foster, Vice Chair
�kel
FROM: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE
Jar. B�oaw Sec retar y
Minnetonka Beach
John nnetri n, Treasurer
MinnM►iMa
SUBJECT: MARCH REPORT - LMCD
Dcugiaa E. Babcock
Spring Park
Marvin Bjorlin
Tonle, B illy
1. GENERAL. INTEREST IT EMS,
Jams N. Grathwol
Eacelalor
-oEllen L. Hurr
Orono
1.1 Eurasian Waterinilfoil Task Force.
John G. Malinke
Victoria
Thomas Martinson
We are presently advertising for bids for the trucking
Wayzata
operation, and for summer emp'oyees to operate and maintain the
Rob Minnetonka
harvesters. Thus far, more than $16.000 has been received as
Ro'e's Rascop
part of the private individuals and business fund drive. This is
P
Shorewood
Thomas W. Reese
against a goal of $55,000. This is viewed as an encouraging
Mound
Robert E. Slocum
positio for this early in the drive.
Woodland
Still no word has been received from the Corps of
Engineers on their matching funds. We are planning without
them. If they come through it will be frosting on the 1990 cake.
1.2. Comnrehev,sive Lake Management Plan
The draft plan is complete. I will be meeting with the
Council during the April 17th work session to discuss the plan in
any level of detail that you wish. If a lot of time is to be allotted to
these discussions, s,.ch that we will get into detail provisions and
perhaps working paper data, I would probably bring along Dr
Arndorfer. Let me know.
There has been some initial negative comments on the
manner of makeup of the LMCD board in the plan. I have felt all
along that the plan scheme will not pass review of the oversight
agencies.
1.3 'other General Interest Items.
The draft of an ordinance for control of personal water
craft, (PWC) more commonly known as jet skiis has had its first
reading before a standing room only crowd of jet skiiers, most of
whom want no control at all. My section on prolonged operation
in a single area, was heavily attacked by users. My view, as stated
in last month's report to you, is that we have a problem in Cook's
Bay with this prolonged operation, with the result that shore line
residents and anchored boaters are subjected to hours of the
wailing and droning of these craft. I know that Cook's is not the
only location so affected. If the homeowners and fishermen stay
. home from these hearings, the ordinance will be passed without
000
:
•
defiling with this noise nuisance, and nothing really will have
been accomplished, except to protect the users themselves from
doing dumb things like jumping cruiser wakes in high traffic
areas. If you agree with me, I need your help. now. If you
disagree. let me know. and I'll be quiet.
2.0 CITY SPECIFIC ITEMS -
None
om Reese
Mound Representative
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
TR:mac
cc. Gene Strommen is
00(0 2
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
473 -7033
L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE
April 1990
RECT APR 4 1990
Saturday
7
Water Structures & Environment Committee
7:30 a.m., LMCD office, Wayzata depot
Monday
16
Lake Use Committee
4 :30 p.m., LMCD office, Wayzata depot
Wednesday
25
Public Hearings City of Deephaven Variance, Density,
and New Dock License for 8 additional watercraft in
Bay St. Louis
7:00 p.m., Tonka Bay City Hall
LMCD Board of Directors' Regular Meeting
7:30 p.m., Tonka Bay City Hall
Friday
27
Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force
8 :30 a.m., Freshwater Foundation, Navarre
• 4 -2 -90
07
RECD APR 4 1990
Saturday 21
Saturday
Sunday
LA'(E MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
473 -7033
E V E N T S S C 8 E D O L E
April 1990
Holiday- Johnson Crappie Contest
12 a.m. to 2 p.m.
Lord Fletchers, Coffee Cove
28 WYC Races, WYC dock, 8:00 a.m.
29 WYC Races, Hain Lake, 1:30 p.m.
•
4 -2 -90
•
Noy
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
�
WATER STRUCTURES 6 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE
AGENDA *at
r�
7 :30 a.m., Saturday, April 7, 1990
LMCD Office, Wayzata Ar
REC!' APR 2
k ?I
1. Maxwell Bay/Lakeside Properties Marina reconsideration of the tabli
Y ns
motion on the new dock license and temporary low water variance to
permit temporary extension to 400' using floating docks in place of
permanent docks.
2. City of Deephaven amended new dock and special density license *"It stio*�i
reducing January application to a net increase of eight slips frog►
current license of 210 BSU.
3. Dock license renewals updating recent receipts.
4. Priorities item assessment discussion: Authorized Dock Use Area, SWWWae
Requirements, and Special Density License, per Chair Grathwol's adveace
outline.
S. Progress report on interagency agreement between MCWD, DNR and LHO
on dredging policy statement.
ENVIRONMENT
1. Progress on equipment purchase explorations and preparations for bids
and /or quotations.
2. Personnel preparations for staffing the weed harvesting supervisory
and operations teams.
3. Fund progress, private solicitation.
4. Additional business
•
3-30 -90 /0"
A
�5
M 1 MUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
' MOUNM AOVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
March 26, 1990
Those present were: Chair Bill Meyer, Commissioners
h Micheal, Frank Welland, Jerry Clapsaddle, Michael Mueller,
V±11ts Bill Thal, and Ken Smith, Council Representative Li
►, City Manager Ed ShukIa, Building Official Jan Bertrand
#tanner Mark Koegler, and Secretary Peggy James.
N
Geoff
Btil
+
Jan-
. City
'The following citizens were also present: William Schuyler,
Larry Walker, Paul N osenson, Carolina Luna, Jaun Luna, Brad
Mt1s, and Roger Oah 1 i n.
Punni Commission Minutes of March 12, 1990 were presented
ii1M changes and /or additions.
WTIC N made by Mueller, seconded by Smith to approve the
Planning Cmmloston Minutes of March 12, 1990 as sub -
mitted. Motion carried unanimously.
• - Ti 17 i_- 777 1 r1wT. I E 4 •.i
' '
City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed the applicants request to do
structural repairs to a nonconforming dwelling. The existing
structure encroaches approximately 2.7 feet into the required
front yard setback. Koegler explained that there was a fire in
the dwelling, however, staff has determined that the fire damage
did not exceed 50 percent of the fair market value, $32,2001 and
therefore, is not an issue.
Koegler referred to zoning code section 23.404 relating to non -
conforming uses. He concluded that this application does not
meet the requirements outlined in items (2) and (7). Major
Structural improvements are necessary to repair this structure,
and the cost of the structural improvements alone, according to
estimates by the Building Official, will exceed 50% of the fair
market value of the structure. The City Planner recommended
denial of the request.
Koeg 1 er added, that if the Planning Commission and City Counc i 1
concur with this recommendation, the Building Official will in-
itiate actions to see that the building is removed.
The commission determined that there are no other non -
conformities to the structure or lot other than the encroachment
Into the front yard setback.
A majority of the commission members commented that in most cases
it has been proven to be more cost effective to remove the struc-
ture and rebuild rather than repair the existing.
14"49
Planning Commisslon
Page 2
March 26, 1 SP90
Minutes
Mueller referred to section 23.404 (8) which states• "Al teram
may be made to a b u i l d i n g containing lawful non - con
residential units when they will improve the livability
provided they will not increase the number of dwelling unI;
bulk of the building, with the recommendation and approve).4 x,
City Councii." He beli that this item appll
request; and the applicant should be allowed to repair
Ing. a
Applicant, Paul Nesenson, spoke on his behalf. He refer
POW nine of the packet which lists the repa he If**
complete. He stated that the estimated cost of these'
will be #27.600. The comm ission had a diffi time 40
with Mr. Hesenson on the estimated cost. Mr. Nesenson passed
pictures for the commission to review.
Jensen clarified to the commission that ;tear (2) of seatfea
23.404 states, ". the necessary repairs shell not eonstitM p,
more than 50% of the fair market value of such strl,ltturl. * f
Therefore, $27,500 exceeds S0% of the market value wh I th It
$32.200 x 50% s $16,100. �
MOTION mode by Smith, seconded by Voss to deny the
varlance request per the City Planner's scowandet
which states that this request does not Met the
requlraments of Zoning Code Section 2$.444 (9) and (7).
Mr. Nesenson commented that If the City does not el1ow people to n
make repairs to their structures and require that they remove
them Instead, people won't ask the City's permission to do
repairs, instead they will do repairs without the proper permits.
Mueller agreed.
Michae commented that the building has been deemed unsafe, and
both the City Planner and the Building Official have recommended
that the building be removed.
Motion for denial carried seven to two (those in favor
were: Clapsaddle, Weliand, Thal, Jensen. Voss, Smith,
and Michaels those opposed were: Moller and Meyer).
This case will be heard by the City Council on April 10, 1990.
�1an
Bay.
The commission had no significant comments on these applications.
A M
Fitt ,
b.
Ong Commission Minutes
3
h 26, 1990
�r
Section 495 - Rental Housing Licenses and Regulations was
r'ev 1 gwed IF 1 rst, as fo l lows s
4951000 Mueller questioned the reason for including the last
sentence of this paragraph , "This ordinance Is the Initial step
In the City's effort to provide a complete housing maintenance
code." The commission questioned If this sentence could be
deleted. It was determined that this question would be referred
to the City Attorney.
495 tI 5 .. Jensen suggested that the date for license renewals
should be at a non -busy time.
49S s 20. %". 1. Jensen suggested that a telephone number also
be required. Bertrand commented that things like that can be
changed administratively on the license application form.
Mueller commented on the seconded sentence, "In cases where the
owner of a rental dwelling lives outside of Hennepin County
limits, the registration shall be made by an operator who shall
be legally responsible for compliance with this and other or-
dinances and such operator shall live in Hennepin County." The
commission expressed a concern with limiting the residence of an
operator to Hennepin County since Wright and Carver Counties are
so close to Mound. It was suggested that the operator shall live
within, for example, a 100 mile radius. This will be referred to
the City Attorney for review.
495:20. Subd. 7. Mueller questioned the definition of "tenement
units ". it was determined that since "tenement units" is not in-
cluded in the definitions of this proposed ordinance, the term
"multiple dwelling units" should be used Instead.
495:20. Subd, 10. This subdivision, which relates to Application
for Licenses, states: "Such other information as the City Manager
deems necessary and relevant to administer the City Code of Or-
dinances." Mueller questioned if we are creating a bureaucracy
for this situation.
495 : :5. Mueller stated that "vendee" should be added to this
section wherever "owner" is mentioned. Mueller explained that a
vendee is the buyer of a property, for examples a person buying
property through a contract for deed. The commission determined
to add "vendee," where it applies, to this section.
1072
•
•
k F .
Planning Commission Minutes
Pape 4
March 26, 1990
495140 Thai questioned the wording of this section, mainly, "
The annual license shall be conspicuously posted (In a from
with a glass cover) by the registrant in a public corridor,
hallway or lobby of the rental dwelling for which they are
issued." What does this mean for single family dwellings? Does
the license need to be posted In the hallway of the dwelling?
Bertrand explained that it states "public" corridor, which would
not apply to single family rental dwellings. Bertrand suggested
adding the word "public" in -front of the word hallway to help
clarify. Thai commented that he agrees all rental dwellings
should have their license posted. Bertrand explained that the
intent is to have the Iicense posted In a public place. It was
suggested that the last sentence read, "The annual license shalt
be conspicuously posted In a public place." It was fine►'
determined that the City Attorney should review the comm i ss i c..
comments pertaining to this section and then offer a solution.
Mueller suggested that the statement "(in a from with a class
covering)." should be changed to read, "(in a frame with a
&ranscar_ent covering)." it was agreed that this change should be
made.
495:45. This section should read, " in Chapter 319, Rental
Housing Maintenance Code, ."
f9500. It was determined that the owner or operator should be
held accountable for this section, and "occupant" should be
deleted.
495:80. Subd. (I). This subdivision should be amended as
follows: "The City Manager and his the duly a:ooInted compliance
official are ."
495:85. Subd. (4). Mueller questioned, "What happens to the
tenant If a license is revoked or suspended ?" Bertrand suggested
the following be added to this subdivision, "There shalt be find -
ings made by the City Council depicting what the
tenants /occupants of the building must do after revocatlon, and
determine a time frame for remedies or vacation of the building."
It was the commission's feeling that revocations and /or suspen-
sions should be handled on a case by case basis.
495:90 Subd. (I). Mueller questioned again, "What happens to
the tenant ?" It was determined to leave this subdivision as is.
Section 319 - Housing Maintenance Regulations for Rental
Properties was reviewed as followss
/07 3
Planning Commission Minutes
Pros S
March 26, 1990
31 9 : Subd. 11. Thal questioned why workshops, hobby and
recreation areas cannot be considered habitable rooms. It was
determined that If these types of rooms meet code, they can be
considered habitable rooms, therefore, "workshops, hobby and
recreation" uld be deleted from this subdivision.
319 :10. S M. 12. It was determined that the word "lesser" be
deleted as follows: " or such lesser temperature required .
•
N
319110. Subd IS. Should be changed as follows: "The owner or
h49 the owner's- who has charge, ."
319:10. Subd. 19. Should be changed as follows: "Any person,
firm, y03ftj or corporation who, along:, Jointly, or severally
with others, shall be In actual possession of, . . . as owner,
employee or agent of the owner, vendee or as trustee or guardian
of the estate or person of the title holder. Any person repre-
senting the actual owner, or vendee shall be bound to comply
with ."
319:10. Subd. 26. Should be changed as follows: ". . . any
rental dwelling with one or more living family units."
319:10. Subd. 1 ,7. Should be changed as follows: "ls jhe
reconstruction or ."
319:10. Subd. 32, Should be changed as follows: "fs jhat por-
tion of ."
319:10. Subd. 33. Should be changed as follows: "ts jhe lowest
story in a building ."
319:15. Subd. 1. The title should read as follows: "Maintenance
of Shares$[ or Public Areas."
319:15, Subd. 2. it was determined that this subdivision should
be deleted since maintenance of the dwelling unit and premises
should be the responsibility of the owner. The tenant should be
responsible to the owner, not the city.
319:15. Subd. 6. It was the feeling of the commission that this
subdivision should make the owner responsible if a duplex or mul-
tiple family dwelling, and the tenant should be responsible if it
Is only a single family dwelling.
•
•
It was noted that the second sentence was incomplete; the corn- .
plete sentence should read as follows: "Every occupant of a
rental dwelling unit in a rental dwelling containing more then
one (l) rental dweIiInno unit she 1 be r e spons _ib1 -_ for _ -su exter-
urination whenever his /her rental dwelling unit is the only one
infested."
Planning Commission Minutes
Page 6
March 26, 1990
,119 115, Subd. 10. Should be changed as follows: "The owner or
eeeupant of a dwelling unit shall maintain all supplied ."
319 :15. Subd. 14. The commission determined that the way this
subdivision Is written, Implies that the owner Is responsible to
provide paved parking areas. The zoning code does not require
paved parking surfaces. A possible solution would be to delete
the words "paved and." The City Attorney should review this
item.
Jensen Informed the commission of a proposed "No Smoking" Policy
for city buildings which will be reviewed by the City Council on
March 27, 1990. Jensen also reviewed the City Council mc=ting of
March 12, 1990.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Weiland to adJourn the
meeting at 11105 p.m.
r�
Attest:
•
Chair, 9111 Meyer
/071
MCGRANN SHEA FRANZEN CARNIVAL STRAUGHN b LAMB, CHARTERED
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
WILLIAM R, MCGRANN
1; ..O LINCOLN CENTRE
ANDREW J. SHEA
333 SOUTH 7TH STREET
DOJOLAS J.FRANZEN
DOUGLAS M. CARNIVAL
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-2436
ROBERT O. STRAUGHN
PETER L.COOPER
TELEPHONE 161 =1 336 -2626
KATHLEEN M. LAMB
►AX 16121336-4108
RICHARD L.EVAN6
J. R. TOREN
REC'U APR 5 1990
REBECCA J. HELTZER
April 2, 1990
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
402 East Lake Street
Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
RE: Proposed Ordinance Relating to Personal Watercraft
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
On behalf of the National Marine Manufacturers Association
( "NMMA "), we are pleased to offer our comments and suggestions .
relative to the Lake Minnetonkd Conservation District's proposed
ordinance regulating Personal Watercraft.
NMMA believes in the need for uniformity of regulations from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction. NMMA, at the request of the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources ( "DNR"), has been
actively involved with the DNR in developing a state statute which
would regulate the operation of personal watercraft. A bill
drafted by the DNR as a result of this process is presently before
the Minnesota State Legislature.
The objections to the proposed ordinance that NMMA and its
Personal Watercraft.-manufacturing members have, other than the
failure of LMCD to adopt an ordinance in uniformity with proposed
state legislation, are few in number but of great concern to our
organization:
1. Section 1. This section of the ordinance will add the
definition of "Personal Watercraft" to the LMCD code as Subd. 37.
To be consistent with the United States Coast Guard as well as the
Personal Watercraft Industry Association ( "PWIA "), we suggest you
consider the following industry -wide definition of Personal
Watercraft;
•
/07(o
Page 2
is
"The United States Coast Guard considers personal
watercraft to be Class A (less than 16 feet in length)
inboard boats. The PWIA further defines a personal
watercraft as an inboard vessel less than 4 meters (less
than 13 feet) in length which uses an internal combustion
engine powering a water jet pump as its primary source of
propulsion, and is designed with no open load carrying
area which would retain water. The vessel is designed to
be operated by a person or persons positioned on, rather
than within the confines of the hull."
2. Section 2. Amended by adding Section 3.041 to the LMCD Code.
a. Section 3.041, Subd. 4 - Speed. The NMMA has no
argument as to this subdivision as it reduces noise complaints from
shoreline property owners. NMMA would like to highlight that this
proposed new language is actually repeat language from LMCD Code
Section 3.02, Subdivision 1, which, as amended, restricts speed of
all watercraft to 5 miles per hour within 150 feet of shoreline,
authorized bathing area, swimmer, scuba divers warning flag,
anchored raft or watercraft, and a dock or pier.
. b. Section 3.041, Subd 5. - Operation within 300 feet
of the Shoreline. NMMA objects to this subdivision as it unfairly
discriminates against personal watercraft users and does not
alleviate the concerns as expressed by the LMCD Board.
If the primary concern of LMCD is to alleviate problems
surrounding noisy operation of personal watercraft in a closed area
near shore by inconsiderate operators, the 300' limit is not an
effective way to solve the problem. NMMA appreciates that this
annoyance must be abated, but believes that an arbitrary 300'
restriction 13 unreasonable. The 300' limit is not supported by any
facts which would indicate that the problems highlighted by the
Board would be solved by its passage. Without any factual support,
NMMA questions the legitimacy of this provision. Education, not
regulation is the key in solving annoying operations of personal
watercraft.
C. Subd. 7. - Wake Jumping. NMMA acknowledges that LMCD
has an interest in controlling the prox y of wake jumping,
rather than the act of jumping. Therefore, the only comment NMMA
has in relation to this provision is that it may be unenforceable.
Determining distances over water can be difficult. NMMA is a
strong advocate of responsible watercraft operation. NIMA favors
language contained in the proposed Subd. 9 on careless operation
rather than on a specific foot limitation for wake jumping.
•
077
Page 3
d. Subd. 10. - Rental. The industry is a strong supporter
of boating safety. Therefore, it agrees that persons renting
personal watercraft should be given instruction regarding the safe
operation of that watercraft as well as instruction as to the laws
and rules governing personal watercraft.
e. Subd 11. - Prolonged operation. NMMA agrees with the
Hennepin County Sheriff in objecting to this subdivision. It is an
unfair and discriminatory provision which operates solely against
personal watercraft. The parameters within the defined area are
too vague and ambiguous to be legitimately enforced.
3. Section 50 Amending by adding Subd. 17 (c) to LMCD Code
NMMA would like to emphasize that the noise level of personal
watercraft meets federal and state noise standards. Members of the
Personal Watercraft Industry Association are spending a great deal
of time and energy in an ongoing effort to educate operators in
regards to the rights of others on the water, including the noise
concerns of shoreline residents and other water users.
•
The National Conference of State Boating Administrators
adopted a 90 decibel test for personal watercraft at a standstill
and a 75 decibel level at a drive -by. At present, the 90 decibel
level is attainable by the industry. The proposed 79 decibel level
is not attainable for standstill testing.
NMMA has some serious concerns about the quality of testing
completed by LMCD. NMMA suggests that the LMCD adopt the
recommendations and testing standards of the Boating Administrators
so that a national standard may be developed. Standards which vary
from jurisdiction to jurisdiction could potentially put an undue
burden on personal watestraft manufacturers which in turn hinders
Interstate commerce. There are a small number of personal
watercraft manufacturers in the United States. One of these
manufacturers is located in Minnesota. The adoption of an
unattainable decibel standard would have a severe impact on all
personal watercraft manufacturers and especially the one located in
Minnesota.
The proposed noise regulations apply specifically to personal
watercraft and exclude other Class A vessels. NMMA believes this
•
�07
Page 4
•
is neither equitable nor fair to propose a rule that would exclude
other vessels within Class A category.
Thank you for your consideration of these comments.
Sinc rely,
c
illia R. McGrann
WRM:bd
cc: City Managers or Administrators:
Spring Park
Tonka Bay
Minnetonka Beach
Greenwood
Deephaven
Excelsior
Orono
Mound
Minnetrista
Victoria
Wayzata
Minnetonka
Shorewood
Woodland
C7
1079
I oeamue of Minnesota Cities
April 6, 1990
183 University Ave. East RECD APR 51990
k Paul, MN 55101.2526
(612) 2 27.5600 (FAX 2214986)
TOO. Mayors, Councilmembers, Managers, and Clerks
FROM: Millie Macleod C president
RE: LMC Legislative Policy Committees
Would you like to help shape the League's legislative policies and
priorities? The involvement of local officials is a key component
of the League's legislative program. Local officials contribute to
the League's ability to advance city positions by identifying
issues, studying and recommending solutions, voting on legislative
policies at the Legislative Policy Adoption Conference, and through
personal contact with their legislators. LAIC legislative policies
have high credibility with legislators because they know that the
policies are determined through the grass roots involvement of many
local officials.
To encourage increased participation of city officials -- particularly
elected officials- -the League will revamp its committee process this
year. We will attempt to hold most committee meetings on Saturdays
in the hope of increasing participation by elected officials. We
will also attempt to make less demand on committee members' time by
limiting the number of meetings to three - -one meeting at the
League's annual conference, one meeting during the summer, and one
meeting in early October.
We encourage elected and appointed officials from throughout the
state to sign up for a committee. There are six legislative
committees dealing with different policy areas. The committees are:
DEVELOP STRAT GIES: general development issues including tax
increment finance,, industrial development bonds, redevelopment,
economic development authorities, and housing.
E LECTIONS AND ETHICS: election and ethical issues, such as voter
registration, local government elections, and combined city /school
district elections.
FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE: develop positions on federal policy issues in
coodInation with the National League of Cities on issues such as
fiscal relations, rural development, housing, environment, and
transportation policies.
•
•
/090
GENERAL LEGISLATION AND PERSONNEL: comparable worth, open meetings,
tart liabIlity and ins urance, purchasing authority, mandates,
charitable gambling, licensing of contractors, competitive bidding
issues, personnel, PERA, emergency medical services, veterans*
preference, and military leave issues.
LAND USE, ENER ENVIRONMENT, AND TRANSPORTATION: wastewater
treatment, solid and hazardous waste, ground and surface water
management, land use (planning, annexation, eminent domain, and
adverse possession), energy conservation, and transportation issues.
REVENU SOURCES: municApal finance, levy limits, property tax law,
local government aid, and truth in taxation.
In May 1990, I will appoint new legislative committee members. The
committee appointments are for a two -year period (1990 /91) that
coincides with the state's biennium. The League strives to achieve
balanced representation from all regions of the state on each
committee. I can't guarantee you will be placed on the committee
of your first choice, but every effort will be made to do so.
PLEASE RANK YOUR PREFERENCE FROM 1 (FIRST) TO 6 (LAST).
I would like to serve on:
(use ranking to indicate preference)
• Development Strategies Elections and Ethics
Land Use, Energy, Environment General Legislation
and Transportation and Personnel
Revenue Sources
Name
Address
City, Zip
Federal Legislative
Title
Home phone ,( Work phone ( )
I can attend meetings on Saturdays
I cannot attend meetings on Saturdays
Please return this page to Mary Diedrich, League of Minnesota
Cities, 183 University Avenue East, St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526.
•
/tit
MINM8 - ECONOMIC DZVBLOPMENT COMMISSION - MRRCE 29, 1990 0
Members present: Paul Meisel, Chic Remien, Mark Brewer, yen
Marks, Tim Kenealy, Fred Guttormson and Mayor Smith. Also
present: City Manager Ed Shukle, Finance Director John Norman,
City Planner Mark Koegler and Rusty Fifield from Public Financial
Systems.
Upon motion by Brewer, seconded by Guttormson and carried
unanimously, the minutes of the March 15, 1990 approved.
The continued discussion was held on the land use and finance
sections of thn upcoming report to be submitted regarding the
downtown study. A number of issues were discussed and the
consensus was to have the consultants finalize a draft of the
land use and finance sections.
The next Meeting of the Ccmmission will be held on Thursday,
April 19, 1990, at 7 AM, in the City Council Chambers.
Also discussed was the chairperson's seat. Paul Meisel has been
acting chairperson since Judy Marshik resigned last summer.
Meisel will continue to be acting chairperson of the group.
Upon motion by Guttormson, seconded by Brewer, and carried .
unanimously, the meeting was adjc•:rned.
Rer, r1*7:7 ,
Ed Sh
City Manager
ES :ls
•
/oa
r
National 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue NW omews
League Washington, D.C.
Of 20004 so sawn
Va
Cities (202) 626 -3000' Fan'..
Fax (202) 626 -3043 Feat V17#P1ee'°r'"
Sidney J. 8artrtelanty
Mayor. New OrNru, Loussim to -
second VKIe PriMdlrit
Apri 6, 1990 RECT APR 9 1990 c Oftdo`'"'"'
trrkr*"N Aar Annul
Tony Goddard
Mayor. Phoetkn. Adonis
Dear Mayor E»cud»Director
Alan Bays
I am writing to report to you on how we stand in Washington, D.C.
and to ask you to join me in personally contacting your
Congressional delegation at home over the next few days in support
of our highest municipal priorities.
Please find enclosed a brief summary of these issues and obr
positiops to assist you in this effort. I an counting on you.
The House and Senate are scheduled to return home today until 11pril
17th for the Easter recess. This is likely to be the last
opportunity we will have to send a clear message on the budget,
housing and community development, federal taxes, clean air, drugs,
and cable before Congress begins action. We made an impact through
our visits to the Hill after our meeting last month; now it is
critical that we follow up.
The country is debating how to secure America's future. To what
extent should the events in Eastern Europe change our priorities
and allow the federal government to focus on economic conversion to
face challenges for the future? How that debate is resolved will
affect the destiny of the nation's cities and towns for the
foreseeable future.
It is a key time. Since we met last month in Washington, no
consensus has been reached on our priorities. They hang in the
balance.
One issue has changed. Projections of the size of next year's
deficit have increased substantially. Even if Congress were to
adopt the administration's budget entirely-- cuttinq every priority
municipal program and increasing mandatory Medicare and Social
Security taxes on cities and towns - -the federal government would
still fall far short of the Gramm- Rudman - Hollings target- -
triggering still deeper cuts in all our priority municipal programs
next October.
Until the federal government confronts the federal deficit, it will
simply not be able to be a partner with us in preparing for the
future.
Pat Prakent Tom Bradley, Mayor I Angeles Catdorn . Fend L. Mattison. Mayor Scntland Neck North Carolna . William N. Hudnut, III, Maya. Indianapolis Indiana . Pamela P Plumb,
Councilor Portland Maine . Jessie M. Ratdey. Mara Newport News Vmpua . Cathy Reynolds, Councdwoman-at. Large. Denver Colorado . John R Rousakis, Mayor 5avaraiah Georgia .
Doer tors: Jane Baker. Cou , l Member tia :+aten C.alifOmia . Joan Baker Mayor Pro Te,npore Lubbock Texas . Carolyn Long Banks, Counci member Atlanta Gel - Kenneth 0. Bueche,
ew
Exuve Di rector C oil ad n�<
oMu�pa�Leagie•Margaret W. Corpantee Ma vii Ttl(rnton Colorado.Stephen T. Cassano. Deputy Mayor Manchester .Connecticut .Joet Cogan, I- xecut rre Director
and General Counsel Connecticut Conterer ktuniopat;l -1 . Beulah Coughenour. Councillor Ind,anapoas Indiana . Joseph 8, Daddona. Mayor Allentown Pennsylva na . Carol P Day,
Councilor. Gorham Maine. Palmer DePsuhf, M.i, r ',alt Lake C y 'JCan. June M. Eisland, Council Member New York New York . Heather Flynn, Assemblymember Anchorao. Alaska. John A.
Garner, Jr.. E xecut,ve Direr for Penm,'vdn,a Ll : ,o of G -es . George D. Goodman. E xe - live Director Mirhqa., Murlrnpal League, Fred Guerra, Mayor Pro Tempore San Mai sos, Texas. Jack
Hebner. Councilman hpoi,ane Wasrnnytun•Joe 6. Jackson. Mayo Murf bo Teuiil - SharpeJames,Mayor Newark New Jersey. Betty Ann Kans. Couneil Member . Vash,ngton LC.
Pet it is A. Killoren, Mayor Cc stwuod M -,saw . Peter King, E.e uti,e Director League of Iowa Mun Mike D. Lindberg, City Commissioner Portland. Oregon . Gary S. Markenson,
Executive Director Missouri Mim.upan. eatloe. Raul L Martinet. Mayor waieat P William A. Moyer. Executive Director. Oklahoma Muniupal League. Adolph Ohvas, Vice Mayor Harniton
Ohio. David D. Orr, Alderman Chnago II6 David E Reynolds. E.eiutrveD- , , , !or North Cal ulina League ofMun . Scott A.Seanland,Councilor Bosguefarms New Burton
Stallisood, town Adm-1strato t..r „u. Hhode hland. Nao Takasugi. Mayor Oxna Cal0v -Richard C. Townsend, Execur,e Director Leaoue M Oregon Goes. Avery C. Upchurch, Mayor
Raleigh North Carolina . Thomas J- Volgy, Mayor 4ic5on Arlrcna
April 6, 1990
Page Two
The federal government faces a very real choice over the next few
months. It can cut taxes as most Democrats and Republicans are
proposing and mortgage the country's future, or it can cut the
federal deficit. A refusal to confront the federal deficit leaves
only one other option -- borrowing from foreigners and passing the
buck to state and local governments to bear the responsibility for
investing in the future.
As leaders and representatives of our citizens, we have a critical
stake in making a difference.
It requires that we participate. It would mean sending a message
to Washington to support those who are ready to look forward to the
future and securing America's destiny.
Our task is not to go hat in hand to the Congress, but rather to be
a part of shaping the future together. Most Americans live in our
cities and towns. Most of the taxes that pay for the federal
government come from our constituents. We must make sure that we
have a place at the table in setting our country's priorities.
Please let me know how you make out and how you think we ca follow
up to make sure our message gets through.
With best regards,
1014 1404��
Bob Bolen, President
Mayor of Fort Worth
BUDGET
AND
LEGISLATIVE
PRIORITIES
April 6, 1M
1. REPEAL CRAMM- RUOMAN
The chairman of the House and Senate Budget
Committees and Chairman Can Rostenkowski
(D -Ill) of the House tax - writing committee
have each proposed bills to repeal Grass -
Rudman end return the f *deral government to
a pay -as- you -go system - just as wo use to
balance our budgets in every city and town
in America. These bills reflect the budget
priorities NLC has adopted and supported
agar each of the past B years: I strongly
urge you to send a message to your
delegation to support these efforts.
The federal government is now using more
than $71 billion in surpluses in the
highway, airport, and Social Security trust
funds to cover up the deficit. it will not
even count hundreds of billions of dollars
worth of spending for the savings and loan
bailout. Gramm - Rudman has produced a
federal accounting system which bears
little relationship to reality.
The federal government has devoted enormous
attention to the problems the nation con-
fronts in providing health care, education,
housing, and public infrastructure in order
to for the United States to be competitive
to secure its future. But these progress
are all expected to be cut by Gramm - Rudman
next year because of the inability and
unwillingness of the president and the
Congress to adopt a meaningful, long term
deficit reduction plan.
NLC POSITION: NLC supports Congressional
efforts to repeal Gramm - Rudman and opposes
any efforts to extend the low.
2. FEDERAL BUDGET 9 MUNICIPALITIES:
Neither the House nor Senate Budget
Committees have yet begun action on next
year's federal budget. Both have been
advised that the president's budget falls
for short of the deficit reduction
necessary to meet the Gramm - Rudman targets
even if the trust fund surpluses are used
to cover up the actual size of the deficit.
They are unsure how to proceed, but until
they act Congress will be unable to
consider any tax or spending bills.
The $511 billion 5 year deficit reduction
proposal by Mouse Ways and Means Committee
Chairman Dan Rostenkowski (0 -ill) is the
only pending proposal which would meet the
Gramm-Rudman targets and balance the
federal budget. It would not cut any
municipal programs.
The President's $1.25 trillion budget
proposes major increases in spending for
defense, foreign aid, space, savings and
loan bailouts, education and significant
cuts in *very priority municipal program
except for Need Start and anti -drug ism
enforcement assistance. The budget
proposes no direct role for citi *s and
towns in *ithor increase. It proposes
significant new federal taxes directly on
municipalities and recommends now mandate *.
NLC POSITION: NLC opposes any cuts in
priority municipal programs. It believes
reinvestment in America and its cities flab
tj.,s to ask* the notion semieat itiva_lti.il*
foreign countries should be a higher
priority than foreign aid and defone*
spending. NLC opposes new f *d *rat mandates
and federal tax increases on cities and
towns.
3. TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUNDS
The president's budget retains and uses
surpluses in the Social Security, Aviation,
and Highway trust funds to cover up the
federal operating deficit. The aviation
trust fund surplus is estimated at $7.6
billion; the highway trust fund is
estimated to be $17 billion.
Lost week both Rouse Majority leader top.
Richard Gephardt (D-No) and Mouse Minority
Whip top. Newt Gingrich (1-Go) testified in
support of removing the highway and airport
trust funds from the budget, which would
allow these surpluses to be drawn down and
spent for their originally intended
purposes. This is a bipartisan success for
us.
NLC POSITION: NLC is working with the
National Governors Association, the
National Conference of State legislators,
the U.S. Conference of Mayors, and the
National Association of Counties to fro*
the public infrastructure trust funds, we
stand a real chance in winning if we
redoubt* our efforts.
4. TAXES i MUNICIPALITIES
The president's budget proposes:
a. Mandatory Social Security and Medicare:
Municipalities a...: their employees would be
mandated to pay federal Social Security
taxes for any municipal employees not
receiving comparable retirement benefits
effective October 1, 1990. The tax, 6.2%
on both municipalities and their employees,
would affect over 4 million municipal and
state employees, many of whom are part-time
workers and students.
The president has also resubmitted a
federal tax increase to mandate municipati-
ties and their employees to pay federal
Medicare taxes for all employees hired
prior to April 1, 1986. This tax, 1.45% on
all municipalities and employees, would
Impact at least 2 million municipal and
state employees according to the
administration.
Together, the proposals would raise $3.8
billion in now taxes in 1991.
Both key chairmen in the Mouse nd Senate,
Son. Lloyd Bentsen (D - Tx) an Rep. ban
Rostenkowski (0-111) oppose ttiese tax
mandates. They have both advised us we
need to work hard to ensure they (and we)
wfn.
MLC POSITION: MLC opposes these costly
federal mandates. NLC opposes direct
taxation of cities and towns by the federal
government. MLC opposes federal
interference with locally determined
medical and retirement systems.
b. Elimination of: mortgage revenue bonds
and credit certificates; municipal small
issue industrial development bonds; and
targeted jobs tax credits.
The president called for termination of the
mortgage revenue bond and mortgage credit
certificate programs. The NAB program
enables cities and towns to raise capital
to provide homeownership opportunities for
low and moderate income constituents and is
a critical source of funds to help
municipalities fI none a foreclosed federal
FMA properties and the affordable housing
properties under the savings and loan
bailout legislation.
A majority of the House and Senate support
legislation to extend the mortgage revenue
bond programs, and there is substantial
support to extend the others.
NLC POSITION: NLC supports extension of all
three expiring programs.
c. The president's new savings initiative -
the Family Savings Account would create on
Investment opportunity offering both higher
tax exempt interest rates and a safer
credit rating than cities and towns can
provide. The proposal cG•ild significantly
increase the cost of municipal tax exempt
bonds and )rrowing for cities and towns.
Again, both key committee chairmen, Bentsen
and Rostenkowski, have told NLC they oppose
the proposal because of the impact cn.
Municipal finance and on the federal
deficit. The Congressional Budget Office
has estimated that the savings plan, if
enacted, would increase the deficit by as
much as $20 billion a year after the first
seven years.
NLC POSITION: NLC opposes costly federal
programs which would interfere with the
ability of cities and towns to finance
public operations and facilities.
S. MOUSING
Both the House and Senate will take up the
reauthorization of the nation's housing and
community development laws following the
Easter recess.
Under consideration will be the National
Affordable Mousing Act (S.566), sponsored
by Senator Alan Cranston (D-Cal II), the
Ncusing and Community Development Act (NR
1180), sponsored by Mouse Banking Chairman
Henry Gonzalez and the administration #s
HOPE initiative.
NLC POSITION: NLC support the development
of a two -year free - standing housing
reauthorization bill providing flexible,
block grant assistance directly to local
governments. There mre elements in both
the Senate and Mouse bills which NLCIa
Community and Economic Development Policy
and Steering Committee has endorsed. The
differences in the bills will be worked out
In conference. The cur ant direction of the
bills will be positive for cities and
towns.
However, NLC is opposed to the admini -
strations HOPE initiative. The initiative
offers: 1) no funding for new affordable
housing construction, 2) re -air-s a local
match without direct local government
participation and oversight, 3) calls for
no new financlal resources to carry out it
objectives.
6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Both the House and Senate plan to begin
action to resu%horize the Community
Development !lock Grant (CDBG) late this
month. Both have so far opposed HUD
efforts to include severe changes in the
program. MUD is continuing its efforts to
make drastic changes in the program which
will have a direct impact on cities and
towns.
While not including their proposals in
their recently released HOPE initiative
(i.e., increased targeting, proportional
accounting and a required anti - poverty
strategy plan), they are looking into the
possibility of implementing these proposals
through "administrative" rulings.
NLC POSITION:
of the CDBG
assistance of
sure that.
Legislation,
prohibit HUD
NLC supports reauthorization
program and is seeking the
congressional staff to make
In the reauthorization
wording is instituted to
`row acting administratively.
NLC supports an increase of CDBG to $4
billion during FY91.
7. CLEAN AIR
While the full Senate has completed action
and passed a comprehensive Clean Air Act
reauthorization measure, the House Energy
and Commerce Committee (John Dingell,
D-Mich., Chrmn.) is still negotiating its
version in full committee mark -up sessions.
The full Mouse is still scheduled to have
its opportunity to vote on the measure in
late April or early May.
The provisions dealing with strategies to
reduce air pollution in over 400 cities and
towns across the nation, the Title 1
nonattainment provisions, approved by the
House Committee, provide municipalities
with the necessary tools to help them
achieve national clean air goals and
objectives. The agreement among members of
the Energy and Commerce Committee on Title
1 is to reject alt attempts to amend the
nonattainment provisions on the Mouse
floor, ! Itglilign iNki IVRR2rlss
The Committee has, however, rejected a
number of important measures in the
provisions (Title 11) dealing with mobile
sources -- issues that will resurface when
the full Mouse considers the bill.
a. Reformulated Gasoline: Most importantly,
the Committee defeated an amendment
requiring the availability and use of
reformulated gasoline (gasoline already
available and in use in California, at
prices comparable to that of regular
gasoline, that produces 20% teas pollution
from mobile sources and has the potential
to reduce urban pollution by up to 10% by
199S) in nonattainment areas targeting its
availability first to the most polluted
areas of the country. The rlfgrauleted
!lsglin1 lmindwenl aeonsgred by RSQs !!ii
Ri£hlydlgn- iQ gill ¢! gfflrld !!!in
20 Jh! M251s2 iiggr !n -d is sggggrlld by 11 S L
b. Clean -Fuel Vehicles: The Committee
also, in effect, gutted a clean -fuels
program for the nine most polluted
metropolitan areas in the country. While
NLC supports exemption of emergency
vehicles from a clean -fuels program (at
least until such time as clean- fueted
vehicles have a track record demonstrating
they can meet the needs of emergency
vehicles) projected increases in the number
of cars on the road and - .ohicte miles
traveled would offset even these reductions
In mobile source emissions within the next
decade. Without significant and serious
federal efforts to reduce pollution from
mobile sources, cities will be forced to
impose ever more stringent controls on
stationary sources (their economic base)
and /or to implement transportation control
measures imposing severe restrictions on
the mobility of local citizens. An
alternative to the committee's clean -fuels
- - - -- -- - - - - - -- ----- - - - ---
eroQram gill also be offered iin all
Qrobabilfty by Reel W.J. Touzin 0-Ia and
ty
Mike nera 9_2klas2 on the Mouse floor_
r. Warranty on Auto Emission Control
Equipment: The Committee agreed to
reduced the warranty on auto parts,
including emission control equipment, to 2
years /24,000 miles. Current law requires
warranties on pollution control equipment
of S years /50,000 miles. This issue will
be reconsidered. NLC su 2fil warranties
of 10 year1(100,000 miles.
8. CABLE REREGULATION
Legislation to reregulate cable television
Is pending before the Senate Commerce
Committee and will soon be unde,
consideration by the Mouse Energy and
Commerce Committee. The current vehicle
for consideration, a draft staff substitute
for S 1880 would not give municipalities
any of the additional authority they having
been seeking for regulating cable
television. Now is the time for local
officials to make their case to their
congressional deiegation on local ability
to reregulate rates, additional leverage on
renewal and the ability to set technical
standards for signal quality in conjunction
with the cable operator.
The $@note Commerce Committee intends to
mark up the bill following the @aster
recess. It has the backing of the
Democratic and Republican leadership of the
Committee.
The proposal would direct the FCC to
regulate basic cable rates and allow cities
to apply to the FCC for local jurisdiction
over rate regulation. A city would have to
certify to the FCC that it will follow the
FCC's standards and procedures In
regulating cable rates. If the franchising
authority does not follow FCC requirements,
it loses its authority. NLC is seeking
changes that make application easier and
revocation less likely by the FCC.
Congress and the FCC agree that the cable
industry needs to be regulated in light of
the lack of competition from other video
technologies, escalating rates and poor
customer service. However, they have tak :n
heed of the cable industry warning that
local government involvement in the
rate - setting business would mean that
inconsistent and haphazard regulation could
retard the industry.
NLC POSITION: Now is the time to make the
case that local governments can best assess
the needs of their citizens in dealing with
rate regulation, technical standards and
renewal of franchises.
9. DRUGS
Rangel Resolution
On March 1, 1990, Rep. Charles Rangel
(D-NT) introduced M. Con. R @s. 279 -
expressing a sense of the Congress
regarding direct funding for local anti -
drug enforcement programs. By cosponsoring
the resolution, Mouse Members would be
supporting the concept that (1) Federal
support for local drug enforcement should
be substantially increased; and (2) a
funding mechanism should be developed to
provide Federal drug enforcement funds
directly to local governments to enable a
quick response to the most critical drug
enforcement neeos of local governments.
NLC members should contact your reseeGti - ve
House Members 12 -- urge tAem to coseonsor the
resolution There is, to date, no
comparable senate resolution.
Senator Biden's Anti-Crime Package
Sen. Joseph Biden 10-DeI) has proposed a
comprehensive anti -crime package - S. 1972
that is pending floor action. The bill
contains numerous provisions important to
cities and towns in their efforts to fight
the ear on drugs.
Most significantly, S. 1972 would
reauthorize the state and local law
enforcement block grant program at double
the FY 1990 appropriation level of $450
million. It would also authorize $300
million in new money directly to cities and
towns - for a maximum of $SO million per
city. Cities and towns of all sites
experiencing severe drug problems would be
eligible to apply for funds.
Other provisions affecting cities and towns
Include those that would: authorize $50
million for grants to cities and states
targeting youth gangs involved in drug
trafficking; authorize $20 million in
assistance to rural drug law enforcement to
deal with the drug problem in rural
communities; authorize $ISO million to
construct 10 boot camps on closed military
bases to house federal, state and local
Inmates and, prohibit the importation,
domestic manufacture and male of 16
specific, new semiautomatic assault
weapons.
NLC POSITION: NLC strongly supports the
inressed anti -drug assistance to cities and
towns and the assault weapons provisions
(wbish were originally introduced as S. 767
by Ben. Dennis DeConcini (0 -Az).
10. CHILD CARES The Rouse has posted its
version of a comprehensive child care bill
and will soon join the Senate in conference
to iron out several controversial
provisions. Regardless of the outcome.
President Bush is likely to veto whatever
the conference agrees to.
The Mouse - passed bill would expand two
current -law programs; the Earned income Tax
Credit (EITC) and the Need Start program;
provide federal assistance for before and
after - school care for ulatchkey" children;
and institute quality control measures.
The bill would substitute an expanded Title
XX of the Social services Block grant
program for the NLC- supported Act for
Better Child Care (ABC) as the mechanism by
which new federal funds would be provided
for child care.
The senate - passed bill, S. S, contains ABC
provisions to provide funds to increase the
number of safe, affordable child care
slots. We would like to see the ABC
sections of S. S included in the final
document agreed to in conference. To date,
conferees have not yet been named.
NLC POSITION: NLC supports replacing the
Title XX provisions in the House bill with
the ABC provisions in the serate-passed
bill.