1990-06-12 CC Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL PACKET - 6/12/90 #1
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M., TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 1990
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. APPROVE MINUTES OF THE MAY 22, 1990 BOARD OF REVIEW & REGULAR
MEETING AND THE JUNE 4, 1990 COMMITTEE OF
THE WHOLE MEETING Pg. 1658 -1671
3. SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW TEMPORARY SEASONAL OUTDOOR RETAIL
SALES AT 2281 COMME RCE BLVD. (BEN FRANKLIN)
(SUGGESTED DATE: JUNE 26, 1990) Pg. 1672
4. CASE #87 -66.3: BRIAN & MARIA JOHNSON, 4945 GLEN
ELYN ROAD, PART OF LOTS 17 & 18, SHADYWOOD POINT,
PID #13- 117 -24 11 0094.
REQUEST: ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF RESOLUTION 87 -179. Pg. 1673 -1632
5. CASE NO, 90 -921: WES OLSEN, 2539 EMERALD DRIVE, LOTS
6 & 7, BLOCK 6, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT B, PID #24- 117 -24
12 0041.
REQUEST: TO MODIFY RESOLUTION #88 -179. Pg. 1683 -1712
6. SURMOUNTABLE CURB /DRIVEWAY APRONS - WOODCREST
(PETITION HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED YET SO THIS ITEM
MAY BE PULLED FROM THIS AGENDA). Pg. 1713 -1714
7. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM C1 ^IZENS PRESENT.
8. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING STATE AID HIGHWAYS. Pg. 1715 -1719
9. APPROVAL OF PORTABLE SIGN PERMIT FOR OUR LADY OF
THE LAKE INCREDIBLE FESTIVAL. Pg. 1720 -1721
10. APPROVAL OF PAYMENT REQUEST #2, CITY HALL ADDITION
AND REMODELING - $57,297.34. Pg. 1722 -1725
11. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER #2 - CITY HALL ADDITION
AND REMODELING. (WILL BE HANDED OUT TUESDAY
EVENING)
12. PROPOSED NO SMOKING- POL_TCY. Pg. 1726 -1748
0 13. PETITION FOR MANDATORY RECYCLING AS PREPARED BY
EARTH DAY COMMITTEE. Pg. 1749 -1750
Page 1657
14. PAYMENT OF BILIS.
Pg.
1751 -1766
15. INFORMATION
i MISCELLANEOUB
A.
Department Head Monthly Reports for May 1990.
Pg.
1767 -1800
B.
LMCD Representative's May Report.
Pg.
1801
C.
Memo dated May 24, 1990, from Len Harrell, Police
Chief, on Physical Fitness Specialist Course.
Pg.
1802 -1807
D.
Planning Commission Minutes of May 24, 1990.
Pg.
1808 -1811
E.
Economic Development Commission Minutes of
May 31, 1990.
Pg.
1812
F.
LMCD Mailings.
Pg.
1813 -1824
G.
Request from Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities (AMM) to serve on Legislative
Policy Committees. If you are interested,
please let Fran know as soon as possible.
Pg.
1825 -1828
s
C
Page 1658
65
May 8, 1990
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - BOARD OF REVIEW
MAY 8, 1990
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Board of Review
convened in the Council Chambers of the City of Mound, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City on May 8,
1990, at 7:00 P.M.
Those present were: Acting Mayor Skip Johnson, Councilmembers
Andrea Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen. Mayor Smith arrived
at 7:10 P.M. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle,
Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, Hennepin County Assessor Keith
Rennerfeldt and Hennepin County Appraiser Bill Effertz.
Acting Mayor Johnson opened the Board of Review and explained
that this meeting is to give property c,wners a chance to question
the value placed on their property by the County Assessor as of
January 2, 1990. He explained that each person would be heard
and the Board of Review will reconvene Tuesday, May 22, 1990, at
7:00 P.M. and bring back their final decision on each property.
Hennepin County Assessor, Keith Rennerfeldt, explained that 5.2%
of all properties in Mound did sell. 5.1% off lake properties
sold and 5.2% on lake properties sold.
The following persons responded to the call to be heard either in
person, by calling and asking to have their name submitted, or by
submitting their concerns in writing. They all asked to have the
value of their property rechecked because they felt it was too
high.
1.
PID
#13- 117 -24
12
0217
- LEO WALLIS, 1668 CANARY LANE.
2.
PID
#30- 117 -23
22
0063
- JAMES MILLER, 4781 ISLAND VIPW DR.
?.
PID
#23- 117 -24
34
0096
- VERNON SNODGRASS,
0097
5990 RIDGEWOOD RD.
4.
PID
#23- 117 -24
33
0007
- GUY JOHNSON, 6347 BAYRIDGE RD.
5.
PID
#19- 117 -23
23
0145
- HAROLD KUTZNER, 4653 CARLOW RE).
6.
PID
#23- 117 -24
41
0030
- JOHN SHACKLEFORD, 2),10 HIGIU AND CI'.
7.
PID
#19- 117 -23
13
0047
- BUILDERS FINANCE; CO., INC.,
1055 E. WAYZA`PA BLVD.
(4363 WILSHIRf•; fiI,VD. - A- 3W )
66
May 8, 1990
8. PID #14- 117 -24 43 0005 -- THOMAS HINTZ
1433 46TH AVE. N.E.
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN. 55421
9. PID #13- 117 -24
10. PID #24- 117 -24
11. PID #23- 117 -24
12. PID #24- 117 -24
13. PID #130117024
14. PID #13- 117 -24
15. PID #13- 117 -24
44
11
41
24
13
12
12
0006 - ROGER BECKEL, 4961 BARTLETT BLVD.
0002 - J. TURNACLIFF, 2560 AVON DRIVE
0006 -JAMES FRIESWICK, 2848 HIGHLAND BLVD.
0002 - AL SCHWINGLER, 5301 BARTLETT BLVD.
0022 - CRANE BODINE, 7313 GLOUCHESTER,
EDINA, MN. 55435 (5025 WREN RD.)
0051 - JAMES BAER, 9324 - 40 1/2 AVE. N.,
NEW HOPE, MN. (1665 CANARY LANE
0227 - BERNARD GAUDETTE, 1605 BLUEBIRD
16. PID #24--117 -24 24 0029 - RUTH GRAY, 2640 LAKEWOOD LANE
17. PID #22- 117 -24 43 0025 - TERRANCE HUGHES, 6641 HALSTEAD AVE.
18. PID #19- 117 -23 31 0021 - TURNQUIST PROPERTIES, INC.,
4451 WILSHIRE BLVD.
19. PID #13- 117 -24 43 0015 - HERMAN HASSELBRING, 5211 EDEN RD.
0016
1.0 MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to reconvene the
Local Board of Review on Tuesday, May 22, 1990, at 7:00 P.M.
in the City Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road. The vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - 1990
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, May 8, 1990, in the Council Chambers
at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea
Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also
present were: City Manager. Edward J. Shukle, Jr'., City Clerk
Fran Cl,irk, City Attorney Curt Pearson, City Planner Marl:
Koeqler, City En�linc, John Cameron and the following interested
citizens: P —..,d Beckler, John Nelson, Phyi I is ,1�_;hn� -on, 1,eanne &
Ferry Wood, Doug & Gloria Bryce, Tom Casey, Michael Mueller, Bart
& :Tandy Roeglin, Rick and Barb Roberts.
67
May 8, 1990
The Ydyor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in
attendance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
1.1 MINUTES
MOTION made by Jensen seconded by Johnson to approve the
minutes of the April 24, 1990, Regular Meeting as submitted
and the Minutes of the Committee of the whole Meeting of May
1, 1990, with the following correction: "He also indicated
that the sanitary ati&-stern sewer systems are not flowing
into the lake,' The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
1.2 CASE NO. 90 -911: REED BECKLER, 55XX THREE POINTS BLVD., LOT
1, BLOCK 1, ALEXANDER PARK, PID #13- 117 -24 22 0266, MINOR
SUBDIVISION.
The City Planner explained the request. He reported that the
Planning Commission has recommended approval with conditions as
outlined in the proposed resolution.
Johnson moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -54 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR
SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, ALEXANDER
PARK, PID #13- 117 -24 22 0266, P & Z CASE
#90 -911
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.3 SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE _PERMIT TO
ALLOW TEMPORARY SEASONAL OUTDOOR RETAIL SALES_ AT 228.1
COMMERCE BLVD., P & Z CASE #90 -915
The City Manager explained the revised date for a public hearing
should be June 12, 1990.
MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to set June 12,
1990, for a public hearing to consider a conditional use
permit to allow temporary seasonal outdoor retail sales at
2281 Commerce Blvd., P & Z rase #90 -915. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
D
68
May 8, 1990
1.4 DISCUSSION: USE OF FERTILIZERS, HERBICIDES AND PESTICIDES
ON CITY PROPERTY
Park Commissioner, Tom Casey was present and stated that he sees
4 issues:
1. Do private persons have a right to apply chemicals?
2. Does the community have a right to know what chemicals
are being used? (He stated he would like to have a
community right -to -know ordinance).
3. Are the chemicals used safe?
4. Are the chemicals used necessary?
He further stated he would like to see the Council put a
temporary moratorium on chemical use so that it can be studied
further.
The Council discussed the Park Director's report and his survey
of surrounding cities. Excelsior is the only city in the area
that has an ordinance which states: "Prior to any application of
pesticides on City -owned property, all proposed plans for such
application shall be reviewed and approved by the City Manager
and City Public Works Director ".
The Council then discussed who should review any applications.
The City Attorney stated that there are State and Federal
approved chemicals and that there should be Material Safety Data
sheets on all chemicals used. The Park Director was discussed as
a possible approving authority.
The Council asked that the Park Director provide Material Safety
Data Sheets on all chemicals used by the City on City -owned
property.
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to direct the
City Attorney to prepare a draft ordinance similar to
Excelsior's using only State or Federal approved chemicals.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.5 CITY ENGINEER'S UPDATE ONWEST-EDGE ___BLVD_. IMPROVEMENT
FEASIBILITY REPORT OF 1986
The City Engineer reported that he has updated the report from
1986 and added a 25e inflation factor to reflect L)�)o prices,
which results in a total estimated cost of ripproximatcly $112,000
for the street improvements as described in the oriyin,i] report.
69
May R, 1990
He further reported that another item that needs to be considered
is the need to extend the existing 10" watermain. The Alwin and
Homola properties are the only Mound properties that would
benefit from the main extension. If those two properties were
assessed, the charge would be approximately $22.00 per front
foot. The Engineer recommended waiting to make a decision on the
watermain until the water distribution and quality report is
finished.
A petition, signed by five home owners was submitted. The two
home owners with the most front footage, Alwin and Sage, have not
signed the petition.
The Council discussed the fact that the Alwin property is
considered Green Acres and his assessment would be deferred until
the property is off Green Acres, thus the City would have to pay
the up front assessment and wait for its money.
The Engineer also reported that Minnetrista has not discussed the
street improvement at this time. He suggested continuing this
item until Minnetrista indicates if they would be interested in
this joint project.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to have the City
Engineer contact Minnetrista to see if they are interested
in improving Westedge Blvd. The vote was unanimously in
favor. Motion carried.
COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
There were none.
UPDATE ON STATUS OF SHORELINE DRIVE BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING
REQUEST — — -- - — --
This item was continued to the May 22, 1990, Regular Meeting.
1.6 REQUEST FROM RESIDENTS OF HALSTEAD LANE,_ RE__SURMOU_NTABLE
CURBS AND THE NEED FOR DRIVEWAY APRONS __ - _TERRY WOOD, 287.5
HALSTEAD LANE _
Mr. Wood was present and read the following petition:
"We, the undersigned, hereby respectfully petition the City
of Mound, Minnesota, to recognize and to act on the
following requests:
1. That the curb i nq on the entire length mff on i)Ot h
of ffalstead bane, City of Mound, mri. , i:; hi,fhr�r tnan
70
May 8, 1990
need be, that the present curbing is unsafe to vehicles
entering and exiting the driveways, and that the
present curbing is lacking in properly built driveway
aprons.
2. That the City of Mound replace every driveway curb area
with a properly installed concrete driveway apron, as
described by the City of Mound Building Inspector's
office.
3. That the City of Mound bear the entire total cost of
the above curbing /apron replacement for each resident
driveway on Halstead Lane as designated (See Amendment
A below) .
AMENDMENT A: The above words "Halstead Lane" shall be
understood to mean the entire area on or encompassing
Halstead Lane in the area commonly known as the Woodcrest
Division of Mound, Minnesota."
The City Engineer explained that these str is in the Woodcrest
Addition were done around 1975 by the Developer of the
subdivision. The surmountable curbs were (.one to acceptable
engineering standards at that time. There were no homes in the
subdivision so no aprons were installed. He further explained
that there are a number of other areas in Mound with the same
type of surmountable curbs.
The City Attorney explained to Mr. Wood that the City would not
pay the cost to install the driveway aprons. He suggested that
if the residents wished to have this done they sign a petition
requesting the project be done and then assessed under Chapter
429 of the State Statutes. Several residents in the audience
agreed that they would sign a petition to have the project done
and assessed against their property because it would be cheaper.
The City Engineer suggested that the Public Works Dept. do a
count of how many of these surmountable curbs there are in Mound
and he could then give a cost estimate for the installation of
aprons. This estimate could be done in about one month. The
Council agreed and this item will be brought back to the Council
in June.
1.7 DISCUSSION:-,—CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT _(CBD) PARKING LOTS
The City Manager stated that he sent his memo and the letter from
the City Attorney to all. the property owners in the Cl,D district.
Fie has received communications from 4 of the pro1wrty ownerf; in
the district, Mike Mueller, Dale Sherburne, Phyl1 i!; John on and
71
May 8, 1990
Roger Dolliff. Mr. Mueller's letter was read to the Council.
The City Manager explained that he and the City Attorney have
tried to negotiate a fair price for the parking areas with the
new owner of the railroad, but that the new owner still wants
approximately $4.00 per square foot for the land or $250,000.
The County Assessor has indicated that $2.00 to $2.25 per square
foot would be a fair market value for the land.
The City Attorney stated there are several issues that need to be
determined.
1. Is it desirous to acquire land for parking in the
Central Business District?
2. Who should pay the cost of acquiring said land?
3. Would it be to the f operty owners' advantage to
acquire the lands in their own name and to have fee
title to the property?
4. Are the property owners in the CBD who need parking
willing to pay the costs of acquiring land?
He suggested that the property owners need to petition the City
Council for a public improvement under Minnesota Statutes
Chapters 429 and 459. After receipt of the petition, he would
recommend that a professional engineer and /or planner be retained
to prepare a feasibility report. This will require that some
instruction be given as to how the City and benefited property
owners propose to pay for the improvements.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Ahrens directing the
Staff to let the owner of Dakota Rail know that the City is
not interested in the property for $250,000. Also directing
that a petition requesting a public improvement (under
Section 429 & 459 of the Minnesota Statutes) be given to the
owners of property in the CBD District for their signature.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.8 APPROVAL OF 1990 DOCK REFUNDS
The City Manager reported that there is one more refund not
listed on the sheet in the packet for l,ela,i,l 1,undgren, 0000
Evergreen for $135.00.
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to approve the
1990 dock refunds as submitted with the addition mentioned
above. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
L
72
May 8, 1990
1.9 PAYMENT OF BILLS
NOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to authorize the
payment ir f bills as presented on the pre -list in the amount
Of $189,701.59 when funds are available. A roll call vote
was unanimously in favor. Notion carried.
ADD -ON ITEMS
1.10 PAYMENT REQUEST
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to approve
Shingobee's Payment Request #1 for work completed through
April 27, 1990, on the City Hall Addition and Remodeling
Project in the amount of $27,423.21. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.11 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF RESOLUTION #87 -179
NOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to have the
Planning Commission and the Staff review this extension
request and give their recommendation before Council action
is taken. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
1.12 PROCLAMATION FOR BICYCLE WEER
Johnson moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -55 RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MAY 14 -22, 1990,
BICYCLE WEER IN THE CITY OF MOUND
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
INFORMATION MISCELLANEOUS
A. Department Head Monthly Reports for April, 191)0.
B. LMCD Representative's Monthly Report for April, llil)o.
C. Minnehaha Creek Watershed I) ;trict material:; from m.1y 1,
1990, C.O.W. Meeting.
1.13 MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Johnson to direct the
Staff to send letters to the Hennepin County Commissioners,
the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the L.M.C.D., and
the Department of Natural Resources indicating the City of
Mound's opposition to pumping water from wells or diverting
water from rivers to increase the lake level of Lake
73
May 8, 1990
Minnetonka. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
D. Planning Commission Minutes of 4/23/90.
E. Economic Development Commission Minutes of April 19, 19?0.
F. Notice of Associaticn of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM)
1990 Annual Meeting, Wednesday, May 16, 1990, at McGuires
Inn in Arden Hills, MN., 5:30 P.M.
G. Letter from Tad Jude re: Buds; t Meetings Hennepin County
Board.
H. Councilmember Jessen received a phone call (5/2/90) from
Hennepin County Commissioner, Tad Jude. Jude indicated that
a study is currently underway by the City of Minneapolis and
six suburban communities looking at the vulnerability of
their water supply in relationship to diverting Mississippi
River water to Lake Minnetonka, in terms of drinking water
needs. A hydrological model is being worked on over the
next 1 1/2 months by the City of Minneapolis in this regard.
The uNR is pushing these cities to do this study. The
entire study is supposed to take 1 1/2 years.
I. Letter from the people who attended the Westonka Town
Meeting on the Environment as part of the Farth Week
activities held April 22 -28, 1990. The letter is being sent
to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District, L.M.C.D., Senator Gen Olson, etc.
J. Meeting summary of Earth Week Town Meetinq held April 25,
1990.
K. L.M.C.D. mailings.
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to adjourn at
10:50 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
F:dwrard . 1 . 1r., C i t y
Fran Clerk, CMC, City C]erF:
• MINUTES - COMMITTEE OF THE VHOLE - JUNE 4, 1990
The meeting was called to order at 6 PM. Members present: Mayor
Steve Smith, Councilmembers Liz Jensen, Andrea Ahrens, Skip
Johnson and Phyllis Jensen. Also present: City Manager Ed
Shukle.
Discussion on the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD)
Lake Management Plan was discussed. The Council went- through the
Environmental and Management Sections of the plan. Then prepared
an outline for the public hearing to be held at the City of Min-
netonka on June 6th. It was the consensus to have the City
Manager summarize the outline in a presentation format and to
have the draft of this sent to the Council on June 5th, so that
any changes could be made prior to the hearing. Mayor Steve
Smith will attend the public hearing at 7 PM on June 6th to read
the comments from the City of Mound. It is also the consensus
that the City Manager put together a full report of comments that
can be submitted to the LMCD prior to June 18th, the deadline for
submission of comments on the plan.
Upon motion by Jensen, seconded by Johnson and carried unanim-
ously, the meeting was adjourned at 8:20 PM.
• R ctfully" su witted,
Ed Shukl e
City Manager
ES:ls
•
14 �/
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CASE NO. 90 -915
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW TEMPORARY SEASONAL OUTDOOR
RETAIL SALES AT 2281 COMMEkCE BLVD. (BEN FRANKLIN)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
will meet in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, at 7.30 p.m. on
Tuesday, June 26, 1990 to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow Temporary •
Seasonal Outdoor Retail Sales at Ben Franklin, 2281 Commerce Blvd., legally
descrbied as follows.
That part of Lot 52, Lynwol.d Park, Lake Minnetonka,
P.I.D. 014- 117 -24 -44 0036.
THE HEARING PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 1990 HAS BEEN
CANCELLED.
All persons appearing at said hearing will he given the opportunity to
be heard.
Francene C. Clark, City Clerk
Published in "The Laker" June 11, 1990. Mailed to ro er •
p p ty owners within
a 350 foot radius on June 15, 1990.
16 ��
.7
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner rrW-
DATE: May 11, 1990
SUBJECT: Extension of Resolution 87 -179
APPLICANT: Brian and Maria Johnson
LOCATION: 4945 Glen Elyn Road
EXISTING ZONING: R -1, Single - Family Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Reside al
BACKGROUND: On ..September 22, 1987, the City of Mound approved a
variance to recognize an existing non - conforming 6 foot front yard
setback to allow construction of an addition of 18.2 feet by 52
feet and a 22 by 36 foot garage. Construction of the improvements
.did not occur. On May 8, 1990, the Mound City Council reviewed an
extension of the resolution approved in 1987 and decided that due
to the lapse of tame from the original approval date, the request
should be examined again by the Planning Commission.
RECOMMENDATION: The request and the facts pertinent to this case
remain the same today as they did in 1987. Staff recommends
approval of a one year extension of Resolution 87 -179.
3030 Harbor Lana North Bldg 11, Suite 104 Minneapolis, MN. 55117 -2175 612/553 -1950
/,673
72
May d, 1990
Project in the amount of $27,423.21. The vote was •
unanimously in favor. Notion carried.
1.11 REQUEST FOR EEMBION OF RESOLUTION #87 -179
NOTION made by Johnson, seoonded by Jensen to have the
Planning Commission and the •taff review this extension
request and give their recommendation before Council action
is taken. The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion
carried.
1.12
Johnson woved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION f90 -SS RESOLUTION PROCLIMMO MIT 14 -22, 1990,
DICYCLE WEEK IN TES CITY OF MOUND
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
A. Department Head Monthly Reports for April, 1990.
S. LMCD Representative's Monthly Report for April, 1990.
C. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District materials from May 1,
1990, C.O.W. Meeting.
1.13 NOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Johnson to direct the
•taff to send letters to the Rennepin County commissioners,
the Ninns.,aba Creek Watershed District, the L.M.C.D., and
the Department of Natural Resources indicating the City of
Mound's opposition to pumping water from wells or diverting
water from rivers to increase the late level of Lake
Minnetonka. The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion
carried.
D. Planning Commission Minutes of 4/23/90.
E. Economic Development Commission Minutes of April 19, 1990.
P. Notice of Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (ANN)
1990 Annual Meeting, Wednesday, May 16, 1990, at McGuires
Inn in Arden Hills, MN., 5:30 P.M.
G. Letter from Tad Jude re: Budget Meetings Hennepin County
Board.
)6? y
h1) t) -0k1
• May 2, 1990
To: Mound City Council
c/o Ms.Peggy James
Mound, MN 55364
From: Mr. and Mrs. Brian R. Johnson
4945 Glen 81yn Road
!found, MN 55364
'ear Sirs...
Enclosed, please find copies of Summation, Comments and Recom-
mendation by Jan Bertrand dated September 14, 1987 regarding the
request for Setback Variance of Existing Structure (Case 87 -663).
Also enclosed, is the Council Resolution 87 -179 confirming the pro-
posed Variance with no dissenting opinion.
Tt was assumed that we would be proceeding with remodeling and
• cc,nstruction at the time of the original variance. However, due to
weather and financial implications, we were unable to proceed until
this ;spring.
Therefore, per conversation with Peggy James, we would like to
apply for an extension of the original variance so that ue can
submit drawings and specifications for permits at this time.
A:,suming that thy, original variance can be extended, we will be
pr,:- eeding with c nstructi,-)n,'remodeling per original proposals to
C,?uncil as quickly as possible.
PFJ:brj
Enclosure
Thank You...
Sincerely,
Brian and M-3ria Johnson
147S-
September 22, 1987
RESOLUTION NO. 87 -179
RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO
ALLOW AN ADDITION FOR PARTS OF LOTS 17 AND 18, BLOCK 24, •
SHADYWOOD POINT; PID NO. 13-117-24 11 0094 (4945 GLEN
ELYN ROAD) P b 2 CASE NO. 87 -663
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to recognize an existing
non - conforming 6 foot front yard setback to allow an addition of 18.2 feet by
52 feet and a 22 by 36 foot 3 stall 1 story garage for part of Lots 17 and 18,
Block 24, Shadywood Point; PID No. 13-117 -24 11 0094; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R -1 Single Family ton4ng
District which according to the City Code, requires a 30 foot front yard setback,
10 foot sideyards, and 15 foot rear yard and a minimum dwelling size of 840 square
feet; and
WHEREAS, Section 23.404 Subdivision (8) provides that alterations may be made
to a huilding containing a lawful non - conforming residential unit when the alter-
ation will improve the livability thereof, but the alteration does not increase
the number of units.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, as follows:
I. That the City does hereby authorize the existing nonconforming principal
structure at 4945 Glen Elyn Road; PID # 13-117 -24 11 0094.
2. The City Council authorizes the existing structural setback violation and •
authorizes the alterations setforth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Sub-
division (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remains
as a lawful, non - conforming use, subject to all the provisions and restric-
tions of Section 23.404.
3. It is determined that the livability of the residential unit will be improved
by aiftior zing the following alterations to the non - conforming use property:
The addition of an 18.2 by 52 foot one story addition to the living space
with a 22 by 36 foot 3 stall one story garage to the existing 18.2 by 28.3
foot one story dwelling as a slab on grade as shown on the site plan
identified as Exhibit "A ".
Upon the further condition that the existing dwelling be brought to
current building code, correct the drainage on the site to divert water
from the existing and new addition, and removal of the front y.6 by 6.2 ft.
entryway.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember libel and seconded
by Mayor Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Abel, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none. �
// ? _ ^ f�
L :'es[ C1�tY1Clerk MaYor
%.t1.JL 1W. o / -UU.J
TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official
Planning Commission Agenda of September 14, 1937
CASE NO. 87 -',63
APPLICANT: Mr. Brian R. Johnson
LOCATION: 4945 Glen Elyn Road
LEGAL DESC.: Parts of Lots 17 and 18, Shadywood Point all in block 24;
PID N13- 117 -24 11 0094
SUBJECT: SETBACK VARIANCE OF EXISTING STRUCTURE
EXISTING ZONING: R -1 single family
PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to add a 18.2 by 52 foot one story
addition to the living space with a 22 by 36 foot three stall one story
garage to an existing 18.2 by 28.3 foot one story dwelling with a slab
on- grade. The floor area is 504 sq. ft, the required is 840 sq. ft. minimum.
The property was subdivided in July to have a conforming side yard for lots of record
of 6 feet and to bring the lot area to within 10% of the required 10,000
sq. ft. in the R -1 zoning district; lot area 9,187 sq. ft. The front yard setback,
• however, is 6 feet ±; the required setback is 30 feet to the existing structure.
COMMENTS: The dwelling is 17 feet from the curb line as the boulevard is 11 feet.
The structure is currently valued at$16,200. The applicant has a slab on -grade
home, with a cesspool in the yard which must be filled, a wall heater to heat
the home, etc. The applicant does plan to correct all of the deficiencies
in the structure, such as, but not limited to, central heating, correct yard
grading, fill cesspool, additional outlets for electrical and bring to current
code, size water piping to code with waste and venting of plumbing,
plumbing accessibility, new water heater, change all windows, etc.
RECOMMENDATION: The addition portion of the structure will have conforming
setbacks to the property lines for lots of record, the floor area will bring
the structure to the minimum floor area. Staff recommends granting the
variance upon the condition that corrections be made to the existing dwelling
to bring i4 into conformance with current building code and correct the
drainage on the site to divert water away from the existing and new addition
with removal of the front 4.6 by 6.2 foot entry.
The abutting neighbors have been notified.
This will he referred to the City Council on `�eptember 22, 1987.
/� 77
Planning Commission Minutes
September 14, 1987 - Page 2
as it goes around curve and not down to the lake; topography is very steep
there. Staff is recommending approval of the one story 2 stall 22 by 24 foot
garage due to the shape and topography of the lot; but that the 10 by 10 foot
storage area be located elsewhere on the lot. The setback for the garage
could be used as part of the terrace to retain the hill on the East. The
garage doors would be on the West.
The Commission discussed the request at length. Applicant advised that corner
of his proposed garage will actually be 8 feet from the curb and, in response
to a question on garage width, he noted that 4 feet of it is entry and garage
will be only 20 feet wide. Several Commissioners stated there is no sight pro-
blem on the road. It was thought there is a hardship for the garage; but not
for the storage area and it could be relocated.
Meyer
Stwms moved and Weiland seconded a motion to recommend approval with the
Staff's recommendation (no storage area). The vote was unanimously in favor.
This will be on the Council agenda of September 22, 1987.
3. Case No. 87 -663 Variance setback of existing structure at 4945 Glen Elyn Road
Part of Lots 17 and 18, Block 24, Shadywood Point.
Applicant, Brian R. Johnson, was present
The Building Official explained request is to add an 18.2 by 52 foot one story
addition to living space with a 22 by 36 foot 3 stall garage. She noted that
the exiting home has a 6 foot setback to the front property line (Glen Elyn);
has been treating as a lot of record from the subdivision recently done; appl
cant removed an encr.achment from east side of property and established a 6 fA
sideyard setback to existing house (18.2 By 28.3 feet in size). The lot size
is within 10% or the required 10,000 square feet; required setbacks are 30 feet
to Glen Elyn;. 10 feet to Paradise Lane; 6 feet to the side with a minimum
house size of 840 square feet. The proposed addition will have conforming
setbacks and bring house to minimum floor area. Staff recommends granting the
variance upon condition existing house is brought up to current building code,
drainage on site be corrected to divert water from the existing and new addi-
tion and the front entryway be removed; also that sept;c tank in yard be filled.
Applicant stated house has masonry fireplace and sewer and water service; he
commented he will be upgrading the existing; also noted that it doesn't ob-
struct traffic views. The Commission discussed the setback from Glen Elyn.
Neighbor, Ernie Strong, overlooks this site and believes what is proposed
will be an enhancement to the neighborhood.
Jensen moved and Meyer moved to accept staff recommendation. The vote was
unanimously in favor.
This will be on the Council agenda of September 22, 1987.
4. C.sse No. 87 -664 Structural repairs to a nonconforming structure at 5124 Tuxedc
Boulevard; Lot 14, Whipple Shores; PIO 24- 117 -24 43 0062
Owner Robert Huffman and Applicant Richard Rucinski were present. •
The Building Official explained Mr. Rucinski was in to obtain a building permit
to do repair after some storm damage; part of the foundation was washed away.
I � 7 8
C7
.J
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
PTgerN ter: PAUL CARSON
r -- --
� N
Uwe-. E-N ELYN R QA D e
00
8)83 4f,
y.. • f
u
f
W mot. I
%a PARCE
� M
o
I
ti
/
PAR C L 8 ~ v 4.r /,
b �' 0/ 1),520 sa. •t.
i
�►- oti
00 FROMM rA•CLL DlrlalOn 04fp11PT10t1 ;;
PAaC61. A: '
ibON —18 Of Loll 17 SIIADVINKIM POINT. accotalne t0 Ihe
re<vrJed OI•t thereof. INnnepin Coent 1. ■In.Nwta Iflne w.l.rlf
ad .wrtbrNUrlf of the fCl for i,N Oeecr lhod IIN; ap LwlM .t
• In1nt a. [IN .grt1, II,N <f a. /d bt la alat•nt •..) fNt swat
of the north. et corner of N IJ Lot la; thews* a.wtoNrl/ Pe.•11.1
10 the wet 11 of 0. ,, 4.t I . dl•tanee of 138-17 rent: tr.,r.
Ca. awthwatellf to a polo[ a. Ule eorrh IIN of Nld 1.et 1 r dul.nt
71.50 fN[ Mater if or [he eorthNat coiner of said LOt 17 and
er lJ line there le r.1...[l,v).
Ph"Ct4 a:
Lot la, a11AUTIN"I MINT, according to the rocorded plat thereof.
ta. 11en.1epin Cnr..tf, alnnNOL. ea Celt th•t Part of aald Lot 16 ITing
weterlf of • Ilea d.•cflbad .• fel :ova: aerg inn /ng at • iVlwt
e+. tlw north Il..e o[ ea1J 1- 1a dlatlnt f. I fNt Net of the
..Orthwat Mr— or Nld Let 1so IMwLY serf Mrlf Iwrallel to rhe
wet line of "Id bt is r distance Of 1)a. )7 INt: ther.ee Sent h-
watarir to a Pllnt on the aer th ". Of tot 17, NId s1111DT110W
Po,wr, dt•tent 71.50 INt wet.,I, of the aw th••st Corner of
Nld Lot 17 and "[a 11..e tl.ere tarolnating-
>~N
"Mr ;
'Lw-
- 50.00 So.
W 1 .i
n
1 EXISTING LEGAL D6SCRIPTioms :
Lot 17, SIIADYMOOD POINT,
according to the recorded plat
thereof, flennepin County, Minneso
Lots is and 19, SIIADYMOOD POINT,
according to the recorded plat
thereuf, Ilennepin County, Minneso
GENERAL NOTES:
o
Denotes
iron monument
Proposed top of foundation elev.
•tom
Denotes
cross chiseled in concrete
Proposed bllsetaent floor slev- .
■931.3
Denotes
existing spot elevation
Proposed garage floor slev. .
®
Denotes
proposed spot elevation
Denotes
surface drainage
BENCHMARK:
Dashed
contour lines denote proposed features
Solid
contour lines 6snoto existing features
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report r, XALt
ALL-METRO LAND prepared by me or under .y d)rw:t au or end ,Il:t 30
SURVEYORS I a■ a duly Registered Land Sur7eyor under the lava of
the Stato-of-kjpnr s . La. 2340 [o SUNI
Lang Leta, M1nong fols 55 3% s?ouJ r
►aC!
M 473 -1433 DATE T", i �/ 19PJ REG. NI)MDrR 00.15
Di,nr
rt�
•
•
•
o_.==
Q
:9
E^ 1,
Li.
L
O
OI
� uv
•� W
W
u
� c
C
V / O
16 81
E
q
m
w
v
-
a w
�
m
O c
w
m
^'
EE
� _ I
A
C
a
S
4
-
v
at
t
�
i
v
c
A
•g
N
m
Y
41
W
�
O 0
_ •N
r
W '
Q
:9
E^ 1,
Li.
L
O
OI
� uv
•� W
W
u
� c
C
V / O
16 81
-!ice � ♦♦ � p a` �•
Sir
N
t;p
�\ _ �/ lb , ^ of. •r
I
fir' m\ .' X, l
'_11pi SS" \ N
..L.`. f{p\N
�
\ co
4y IV
ek
\•'C
i ' �� J r dN • 100 D
1p
I , N • � � �� �n %�i aO� �OiO �� •
ey
W 3 r <F
CY -3t
I W�,t bbd �4. _ I, �.'.JiS : � o _ .. ,- :•.. -. 7
I �
N n �.
•l �j i� i �.l • a i
M1 72
NVO-
NO
CY
S,40 O O A r °
r� a V ,: �+ 3 c" � .o Vii, � _ • / %'��,r��/J' '' ! �o�, �C�
�} 7g
SIP
n
e �y%.��
,� l •���Jr V rr'�J /� ��� / (_ "ye�
N
410, c ^ N cfj�2 ojJ s ti
LD
' • . _�. lip . ; i � ii.. L m
v ',� ,NN
1Nf
N y N Cr
V, / ,
n% G H
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
M UND 1DV1SOR1/ PLANK lHG COHNISSION
May 21. 1990
C. G&ae No, W -Vzli Ks wisan. c�a7 cw =r�ra urrvs. wss o t• i.
• SIock 6 Shirley Hills Unit 0. PID 024- 117 -24 -12 0041,
VAR1ANCE2 Request to Modlfr RtrsolutIOD 099 -179,
City Planner. Mark Koegler, referred to the extensive history of
this case as outlined In his recommendation. Koegler explained
that after Resolution #88 -179 was adopted. which required removal
of the garage, the garage then became an illegal non - conforming
use. In order for Mr. Olsen to keep his garage. a variance must
be granted. Koegler Informed the Commission that he conferred
with the City Lngineer about the possibility of vacating Ruby
Lane. ►x:wever. It was not recommended.
Staff recommended dental of the proposed modification of the
resolution granting a varIanr7e for the existing garage.
Applicant. Mr. Wes Olsen, reviewed the history of this case and
made the following comments: he wishes to keep the garage, the
garage sits 22 feet from the pavement. the garage Is structurally
sound, the neighbors garage is 2.5' closer to Ruby Lane than his
garage. he did not know the garage had to be removed when he pur-
chased the house, he does not wish to vacate Ruby Lane. he woulJ
like to improve the garage, however, has not done so to-date
since It was not recommended until this issue was resolved. and
he was quoted the amount of $1.500 to remove the garage.
Frank Matachek, Mr. Olsen's neighbor, spoke in favor of removing
the garage.
Thal asked Mr. Olsen when the electricity was Installed in the
garage. Mr. Olsei Informed the Commission that It was Installed
before he purchased the house.
Mueller commented that Mr. Olsen could take the contractor to
court for restitution since he did not remove the garage as he
promised to do. Mueller also compared this request to other
variances that have been granted to properties where their was a
greater encroachment involved. Some Commissioners argued that
each case is different and their are different circumstances with
each case to consider.
Thal commented on the fact that a hardship does not exist to al-
low this garage: their Is plenty of available yard space to con-
struct a conforming attached or detached garage.
Mueller commented that Ruby Lane is not a busy street. Mr.
Matachek stated that Ruby Lane Is a well traveled street; he has
counted eight or nine cars pass In one half a day.
After further discussion, the following motion was made:
MOTION made by Thal, seconded by Welland, to deny the
request as recommended by staff. Motion carried 7 to 1
(those In favor were: Clapsaddle, Welland, Thal,
Michael, Jensen. Voss. and Snithi those opposed were:
Mueller).
Mueller explained that he was not in favor of the motion due to
previous actions of the Planning Commission recommending a
variance be grunted for a property on a buster road, with a
garage closer to the street than this one.
• Mr. Wes Olsen expressed his unhappiness with the Planning
sio'
Comm is n s recortmendatIor).
This case will be reviewed by the City Council on June '2. 1990.
4 83
I
1449
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner 1"19—
DATE: May 11, 1990
SUBJECT: Variance Resolution Extension Request
APPLICANT: ales Olsen
CASE NUMBER: 90 -7,1
VHS FILE NUMBER: 90- 310- AI9 -ZO
LOCATION: 2539 Emerald Drive
EXISTING ZONING: R -1, Single - Family Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential
BACKGROUND: The following chronology provides an overview of this
request:
October 24, 1988 The Planning Commission recommended approval
of a house size and setback variance to permit
improvement of the residence at 2539 Emerald
Drive. The variance approval required removal
or relocation of an existing one car garage
that was non - conforming. The owner of the
pruperty was Donald R. Bonnicksen.
November 29, 1988 The City Council approved the vjriances with
the stipulation that the Ux;"ting non -
conforming garage either be r�movFrd u
relocated to briny it intu confurrning status.
August 4, 1989 A new owner of the propF.,rty, Mr. Wes Olsen
s1gned a statement. reading, "I have received
copies of the variance pro(,eed of the City
Council oaten November 2 1`j88, Resolution
M88 -119. I ayree to comply with the
requirements of this re,,olution or I will re-
apply to reverse or alter t�F origina?
decision."
3030 Marba, lane North aid, Suite 104 MinneaPnhs, MN 55441 2175 Ft2 -x,53 1850
•
•
•
•
•
•
Olsen Planning Report
May 11, 1990
Page 2
November 14, 1989 Mr. Olsen applied for an extension of the
resolution citing three facts:
1. "My builder did not disclose to me any
variance problem with the garage."
2. . "I am the new owner of the property and
do not have an alternative garage."
3. "There is substantial cost to removing the
structure."
November 28, 1989 The City Council denied the variance extension
request stating, "Mr. Olsen was aware of the
variance problem with his garage. The variance
was to be filed on the property. Removal or
relocation of non - conforming garage was clearly
stipulated in the original resolution."
November 29, 1990 The Mound Building Official notified Mr. Olsen
that the requested extension was denied leaving
three options:
1. Mr. Olsen could secure a demolition permit
for the garage.
2. Mr. Olsen could re -apply for a variance
to modify the original resolution (88-
119).
3. The City could initiate legal action.
April 4, 1990 James Larson, City Prosecuting Attorney, informed
Mr. Olsen that he was requested to commence legal
action to force removal of the garaye.
May 1, 1990 Mr. Olsen submitted a new variance application to
the City of Mound to modify the resolution to
approve a variance for the existing garage.
COMMENT: This case has a long history all centering on a non-
conforming garage. When the original application was submitted in
1987, the property had the status of a legal non - conforming use.
After the resolution specifically requiring removal of the garage
was adopted in 1987, the garage became an illeg 1 non - conforming
use. It remains in this status today.
yeas
Olsen Planning Report
May 11, 1990
Page 3
The facts of this case have remained unchanged since the first •
application was filed in 1987. Based on the facts alone, staff
does not see any grounds for reversal of any of the previous
actions taken by the Planning Commission and City Council. In
support of the recent application, Mr. Olsen states that Ruby Lane
is a 13.5 foot wide access that serves only one other garage. In
response to this statement, the City Engineer examined the
potential of vacating Ruby Lane. Because of overall traffic
patterns in the area and the existence of utilities in Ruby Lane,
vacation of the right -of -way does not appear to be a reasonable
option.
RECOMMENDATION: Past actions by the City of Mound have followed
a pattern indicating that the non - conforming garage is to be
removed. The evidence presented does not justify reversal of this
decision. Denial of the proposed modification of the resolution
granting a variance for the existing garage is recommended.
•
0
w�
MAY 3-NO
- 3a4 y4 4 1
STV OF MouNO PART I Case No.
Date Filed
Fee E50.00
VARIANCE APPLICATION
PLANNING 3 ZONING COMMISSION
(Please type or print the following information.)
Address of Subject Property ,C Z144C, -
Loth 7 &W k Block G
Addition 3 PID No.aur] -ZA- IZ M41
Owner's Name l Day Phone
/jam
Owner's Address 2 S 3� 41 4/l•
Applicant's Name (if other than owner)
Address Day Phone
�Isting Use of Property:
Zoning District
Has an application ever been made for zoning, varia ,gWawmn,Qondlt ional use
permit, or other zoning procedure for this property a no If yes,
list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolution number(s)
,s/.,� .• /V: /nd,'�! P11-171
(Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.)
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in
any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac-
curate. I consent to the entry in or-upon the premises described in this
appiicat.ion by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose
of inspecting, or of posting, maintains and removing such notices as may
be required by law.
Applicant's Signature
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
Planning Commission Recommendation___
Date-5-01
council Action:_
Resolution No. ____— ______._____ Date _
VARIANCE APPLICATION Case No._ "10 -CA:; •
1. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for
the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ). No (✓1'. If no,
specify each non - conforming use:
2. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and
setback regulat ns for the zoning district in which it is located?
Yes ( ), No ( If no, specify each non- conforming use:
3. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property pr ^vent
its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning
district?
( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil
( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) sub - surface •
( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) othr�r: specify
4. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone
having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was
adopted? Yes!( ), No �( ). If yes, explain
5. Was the hardship created by any other man -made change, such as the
relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No ( ). If yes, explain
I Y
. �
OARIANCE APPLICATION
Case No. C1 V -qv
6. Are the conditions of hirdship for which you request a varlanc
peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes
No ( ). If no. how many other properties are similarly affected ?___
7. What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area, bulk, and
setback regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of
your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and writ-
ten explanation.
8. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in
the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance?
A-
I
PART III
J. SITE PLAN INFORMATION: All supporting documents such as sketch plans,
attachments, etc., must be submittal in 8- 112"x11" size. If larger
drawings are submitted, one must be 8 -1/2 "x11 ", and 15 larger size
copies must be provided. For each requested zoning variance procedure,
a site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity show-
ing the following information:
I. Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed: (Lot(s),
building(s), dr1veway(s) /street access, off - street parking. and
utilities.
2. Existing and proposed elevations.
3. Distance between: building and fror,t, side and rear lot lines;
principal building and accessory buildings; principal building
and principal buildings on adjacent lots.
4. Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc.
5. Indicate "north" compass direction.
6. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the
city staff and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance.
14 g?
Cert it is it ut `ur vc•v
fill, GuI!l l i ck:,o! IS', I I dul
uI Lot', L, .,III 7, block (j, ',1111(LLV M, L5 UNI I li
IIulll lei) III luUllty, MI!lllc',ot,,
`r c.
GO -�iZl
� r
s•• o � O
\ Col i
4,tr .� . ✓u rf f_i
I fit _Ik'bY ItI1liy
I lit IIUUIId'Ir !," , ul
�IIly CAI 1( 111 t)UI I )Ili
MO (If 'I I( 1 UJl IIIII,'111
3U'
j I c I I'r 'il i
I1J 1' V .'U 1SH
Ilan nlJrk�r �,-
rI ''!w I
l, )I 1 111 i•,� u;
•
•
Attachment A
Dear Sir /Madam:
90 qZi
This letter is in reference to the property 2539 Emerald Drive,
which sits on Lot 7 of block 6, Shirley Hills Unit B. I am the
owner of both Lots 7 and 6 as of July 20, 1989.
The history of the situation surrounding the garage is as follows:
(1) Resolution xx88 -179 was approved on November
29, 1988 to Don Bonnicksen, the previous owner.
(2) I, Wes Olsen, bought the property and closed
on July 20, 1989.
(3) A letter from the City of Mound arrived in
October, 1989 explaining I must comply with
resolution xx88 -179 or request an extension.
This was the first I had heard of the
situation, or variance problem, or anything
involving the garage on my property.
(4) Numerous conversations with Jan Bertrand, a
Mound Building Official, followed after I
received the letter from the City. The first
step I took seemed most logical and that was
to extend the original resolution. THis
resolution was subsequently denied on November
28, 1989. Other observations Jan and myself
made are as follows:
(a) The garage is constructed of 12"
cider..block from floor to ceiling.
This fact was mysteriously omitted
from the original resolution and is
significant to the situation.
(b) The garage actually sits 22 1/2 feet
from the edge of black top on Ruby
Lane.
1
(c) Ruby Lane is 13 1/2 feet wide and is
access for one other garage and that
garage is my immediate neighbor to
® the east.
IM
I -1 I
Page 2 -
(d) The structure is sound and serves as
my only garage.
(e) Demolition and removal of the garage
would cost in excess of $1,600. Bid
obtained from Concrete and Masonry,
Inc., in November, 1989.
The present situation stands as follows:
(1) I am submitting a variance application to
permanently keep the structure.
(2) At some unforeseeable point in the future, I
will add one addition to my current home, which
will include an attached two car garage, one
bathroom, and two bedrooms. I will proceed
with this plan when economically feasible.
•
Thank you for the opportunity to explain the situation. 0
Sincerely,
Wesle A. Olsen
C
169 02-
LAW OFFICES q0' Z 1
WORST, PEARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD 6 MERTZ
� •�rt1.[••.a.• irCl UDrO rr0.[[[Or�� •[[OC�tO +•
ii00 FIRST GAMII PLACE WEST
A TMOMAS Wun*T. PA MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELCO -ONE
CURTIS A PEAgSOM. P A 'e•z, »/ 4200
JAMC& D LAPISON, P A
♦A ■NUw /[w
THOMAS F UMoEnw000, P A
�_RAIG M Mawrz April 18, 1990 �ez� »e zeta
FtOGCN J FELLOWS
RECD APR 1 9
Mr. Wesley A. Olsen
2539 Emerald Drive
Mound, MN 55364
re: Expired Variance
Dear Mr. Olsen:
I have been asked by the City to commence a legal action to
remove your garage and /or a prosecution for violation of the
zoning code.
Before I initiate a process that will involve a great deal of
your time and mine, I thought perhaps we could come to an
agreement regarding your garage.
The garage cannot remain where it is presently located. It
must either be removed or relocated to a position with conforming
setbacks to the property lines.
If you have any questions about this matter or would like to
discuss the matter with me, please feel free to contact me.
JL �*k
cy ! Ed S hu k le
•
Vey truly yours,
James D. Larson
I �TJ
To: City Attorney
REQUEST FOR FORMAL COMPLAINT
1 . Location of the offense 2539 Herald Drive, Mound, MW
FP
M
Date and Time of the offense 2-22 -9C
WITNESS Donald Roger Bonnicksen
Address 750 Carver Beach Road, Chanhassen, MN 55317
Phone 470 -0816 D.O.B. 6 -28 -61
WITNESS
s
Address _ _ 0
Phone D.O.B.
4. Description of Violation Failure to comply with conditions outlined
Resolution #88 -179, City Code Section 23.407 (5).
5. COMPLA I NTANT_ Jan Bertrand ,__Bu I I d i_na Of f i c i a l
Address.__ City of Mounds 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN
Phone 472 -1155 D.O.B. 4 -16 -43
6. DEFENDANT Wesley A. Glsen
Address 2539 Emerald Drive, Mound, MN 55364
Phone (H) 472 -6968, (W) 936 -0226 D.0.B. 3 -2 -63
DATED �, -`�Q_ DATE MA I LED DEL I VERFD
DEPARTMENT _ Inspection Department •
INVESTIGATED BY Jan Bertrand
1 bq y
00 T
0 SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION REPORT
Location of offense 2539 Emerald Drive, Mound, MN
Additional details of offense, progress of investigation, nature
of offense, copies of correspondence, inspection date and the
results, what the witness(es) observed, re- inspection dates and
the results, description of type of property (such as duplex,
fire damage, apartment, etc.):
On November 29, 1988, the City Council approved Resolution #88 -179 to "Recognize
an Existing Nonconforming Structur to ,allow Structural Modifications" for
the subject property. This resolution included the following condition,
"3.b. The nonconforming accessory building will be removed or relocated
with conforming setbacks to the prope =ty lines." This resolution was due
to expire November 29, 1989. In the meantime the property was purchased
0 —
by Wesley A. Olsen. On August 4, 1989 Mr. Olsen submitted written confirmation
to the City of Mound stating that he "received copies of the variance proceedings
of the Ctv Council dated November 29, 1988 Resolution #88- 179." Mr. Olsen
agreed to comply, or reapply to reverse or alter the original decision.
We received from Mr. Olsen on November 15, 1989 a request for an extension
of Resolution #88 -179. On November 28, 1989, the City Council approved
Resolution i89 -148 denying the extension of Resolution N88 -179. Or, November
29, 1989 I mailed a 3etter to Mr. Olsen informing him of the City Council's
decision, and informed him that he must re -apply immediately for any variation
to the original resolution to change any conditions that were approve don
Resolution #88 -179. Per my telephone conversation with Mr. Olsen on February
14, 1990, he stated he would get a variance application into our office
by February 21, 1990 to resolve the problem with the garage. To -date Mr.
Olsen has not submitted an application, nor has the garage been removed
or relocated.
l�Is
284
November 28, 1989
CIO _q 7A
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -146 •
RESOLUTION DENYING THE E %TENSION OF
RESOLUTION #88 -179, WES OLSEN, 2539 EMERALD DRIVE
WHEREAS, the current owner of property, legally
described as Lot 7, Block 6, Shirley Hills Unit "B "; PID #24 -117-
24 12 0041 (2539 Emerald Drive), has requested an extension of
Resolution #88 -179 which was granted to the prior owner; and
WHEREAS, the prior owner did not complete the variance
requirements in Resolution #88 -179, for garage removal and did
not file the variance as required by Mound ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby deny the extension of
Resolution #88 -179.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
Jensen and seconded by Councilmember Johnson.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Ahrens, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: is
none.
Mayor
Attest: City Clerk
1109E
u
�Q -qzl
MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 28, 1989
REQUEST FROM LIES OLSEN, 2539 EMERALD DRIVE, TO EXTEND RESOLUTION
X88 -179
Council discussed this item with emphasis that Mr. Olsen was
aware of the variance problem with his garage. The variance was
to be filed on the property. Removal or relocation of non-
conforming garage was clearly stipulated in the original resolu-
tion. Mr. Olsen was not in attendance.
MOTION by Smith, seconded by Ahrens to table this item until
Mr. Olsen could clarify his recent extension r9quest. The
vote was Smith and Ahrens, yes; Jessen, Jensen and Johnson,
no. Motion failed.
49 Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 89 -148 RESOLUTION DENYING THE EXTENSION OF
RESOLUTION #88 -179, WES OLSEN, 2539
EMERALD DRIVE.
The vote was Jensen, Jessen and Johnson, yes; Smith and Ahrens,
no. The motion carried.
107
CFVY()I NYA'NI)
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 20, 1989
TO: Ed Shukle, City Manager P
FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Officia
SUBJECT: Request to Extend Resolution ##88 -179
Wes Olsen, 2539 Emerald Drive
10 qzl
I reviewed with Mr. Olsen the subject variance which had been ap-
proved for his property when he filed for homestead. I also
reviewed the status of completion of the stipulations stated in
Resolution 88 -179 with Mr. Bonnickson (applicant and contractor)
at the time of final inspection of the remodeling. Mr. Bonnick-
son evidently failed to inform the owner, Mr. Olsen, prior to the
closing of the property of the remaining variance requirements
for garage removal. Mr. Wes Olsen Is requesting an extension of
the variance granted to Mr. Bonnickson until November 1990 to
either complete the removal of the non- conforming detached
garage, or he will apply for another variance approval to keep
the garage in the existing location.
Technically, as the variance was granted to Mr. Bonnickson he
should be responsible for the stipulated conditions for the ap-
proval of the structural changes which were made to the building.
If the City Council grants the new owner an extension, the new
owner must realize that the responsibility for compliance will
be directed to him and not Mr. Bonnickson.
JB:pj
Enclosures: Resolution #.38 -179
Letter from ales Olsen dated 11 -14 -89
cc: Wes Olsen
1490'r)
- -0
•
•
RECEIVED NOV 1 5 1389
C% -q1 Z
November 14, 1989
Ms. Jan Bertrand
Building Inspector
city of Mound
5341 Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ms. Bertrand:
This letter is my official request for an extension for my garage `*
at 2539 Emerald Drive.
The reason for my request is as follows:
1) My builder slid not disclose to me any variance problem
• with the garage.
2) I am the new owner of the property and do not have an
alternative garage.
3) There is substantial cost to removing the structure.
I have plans for one addition, which would involve an attached
garage. However, at this time I have no immediate plans for
construction.
Thank you for your help in clearing up this matter.
Sincer
Wes Olsen
•
477
—re ov
q0l,l
•
:I zpp� B
2t7
I
MOO
0
0
as -qv
325
November 29, 1988
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -179
RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE
TO ALLOW STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS FOR LOT 7, BLOCK 6,
SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT "D"; P.I.D. NO. 24- 117 -24 -12 0041
(2539 EMERALD DRIVE) P i Z CASE NO. 88 -736
WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to
recognize existing nonconforming setbacks of 24.2 feet to Emerald
Drive and 21.9 feet to the unimproved 10' alley way for the prin-
cipal building, a 4.3' setback for the accessory building and an
under sized lot of 6,500 square feet +/- to allow structural
repairs to a nonconforming 600 square foot dwelling on Lot 7,
Block 6, Shirley Hills Unit "B "; P.I.D. No. 24- 117 -24 -12 0041;
and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located in an R -1
Single Family Zoning district, which according to the. City Code
requires a 30' front yard abutting the street front, and a 20'
street front setback for the accessory building, and a 10,000
square foot lot size, and a minimum 840 square foot dwelling
floor area, and -
WHEREAS, Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) provides that
alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful noncon-
forming residential unit when the alteration will improve the
livability thereof, but the alteration may not increase the num-
ber of units, and
001
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
request
and does recommend approval with modifications to the ap-
plication.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council, the
City of
Mound, as follows:
1.
That the City does hereby authorize the existing non-
conforming principal structure setback to the street
frontage at 2539 Emerald Drive, P.I.D. No. 24- 117 -24 -12
0041 with a 24.2' and a 21.9' setback to the street
fronts for the principal building, a 4.3' setback to
the street front for the accessory building, and a 600
square foot dwelling size.
2.
The City Council authorizes the existing structural
setback and lot area violation and authorizes the addi-
tion setforth below pursuant to Section 23.404, Sub
division (8) with the clear and express understanding
001
qo -°Izi
327
November 29, 1988
that the use remains as a lawful nonconforming use sub-
ject to all of the provisions and restiictions of Sec-
tion 23.404.
3. It is determined that the livability of the residential
unit will be improved by authorizing the following al-
terations to a nonconforming use property to afford the
owner reasonable use of the parcel: to raise the house
approximately 24" above the present basement top of
block, install new roof trusses, and remodel the inte-
rior of the structure to be brought up to the r:inimum
current building code standards. Upon the conditions
as follows:
a. No building permit will be issued until the ap-
plicant submits proof of ownership for Lots 7 and
6, Block 6, Shirley Hills Unit "B" to bring the
lot.area to 11,600. square feet + / -, . .
b. The nonconforming accessory building will be
removed or relocated with conforming setbacks to
the property lines. •
C. The applicant may continue to add onto the struc-
ture with a future addition upon the condition
that the addition meet all current zoning or-
dinance requirements within one year of this
variance approval.
d. This variance is granted for the following legally
described property: Lot 6 and 7, Block 6, Shirley
Hills Unit "B "; P.I.D. No. 24- 117 -24 -12 0041.
This variance shall be recorded with the County Re-
corder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County
pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes, Section 462.3595,
Subdivision (4).
This shall be considered a restriction on how this
property may be used.
5. The property owner shall have the responsibility for
filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying
all costs for such recording. The building structure
shall not be occupied until proof of recording has been
filed with the City Clerk.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilne:mber
Jensen and seconded by Councilmember Abel.
1'102.
2
qo -qZ1
328
November 29, 19988
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
Abel, Jensen, Jensen, Johnson and Smith.
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
none.
Attest: City Clerk
•
"'J
Igor
3
1 ?03
177
November 28, 1989
Go- q Z I
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that if
the City Council eventually finds that no other reasonable
alternative to the city hall site exists for public works
storage, the B -1 zoning district should be modified to allow
"publicly owned materials storage areas" as a conditional
use. Performance standards should also be developed to min-
imize the impact on the surrounding properties and the
natural environment.
Council discub-,J this issue.
NOTION by Johnson, seconded by Smith to send item back to
the Planning Commission to develop performance standards for
the 2-1 district as it relates to publicly owned outdoor
storage and to allow its use. Notion carried 4 -1, Jessen
voting nay.
NOTION by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to exclude from con-
sideration both the east and vest sites by city hall accord -
inq to the recommendations given by the Planner. The vote
was Jessen and Jensen, yes; Smith, Ahrens and Johnson, no.
Notion failed.
NOTION by Johnson, seconded by Ahrens and carried unanim-
ously to eliminate the site on the vest side of city hall
from consideration as a storage 'area for public works out-
door materials.
Si. .'.. "M . :1I
The Mayor invited citizens in attendance to address the Council.
No one came forth.
REOUEST FROM WEB OLSEN, 2539 EMERALD DRIVE. TO EXTEND RESOLUTION
88-179
Council discussed this item with emphasis that Mr. Olsen was
aware of the variance problem with his garage. The variance was
to be filed on the property. Removal or relocation of non-
conforming garage was clearly stipulated in the original resolu-
tion. Mr. Olsen was not in attendance.
MOTION by Smith, seconded by Ahrens to table this item until
Mr. Olsen could clarify his recent extension request. The
vote was Smith and Ahrens, yes; Jessen, Jensen and Johnson,
no. Notion failed.
Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 89 -148 RESOLUTION DENYING THE EXTENSION OF
RESOLUTION #88 -179, WEB OLSEN, 2539
EMERALD DRIVE.
\41oi
•
•
•
November 29. 1989
Mr. Wes Olsen
2539 Emerald Drive
Mound, MN 55364
SUBJECT: Variance Extension Request
Resolution #88 -179
Dear Mr. Olsen:
At the City Council meeting on Novemoer 28, 1989 the City Council
denied the extension request of Resolution #88 -179 for your
property at 2539 Emerald Drive. Resolution #88 -179 was approved
on November 29, 1988 and Is valid for one year from the date of
approval. The process for you to stay In compliance with the
resolution is as follows:
1) You may obtain a demolition permit for the detached acces-
sory building with the removal completed within 180 days.,
2) You must re -apply immediately for any variation to the
or!ginai resolution to change any conditions that were ap-
proved on Resolution #88 -179.
3) If you fall to accomplish one of the above Items, the city
staff will be forced to proceed with legal action to ac-
complish the requirements of Resolution #88 -179.
If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please
contact me at the city offices. Your prompt attention to this
matter is greatly appreciated.
Yours truly.
Jan Bertrand
Building Official
JB:PJ
cc: Ed Shukle, City Manager
PoS
November 29, 1933 IC
with frozen material. Jan has spoken with Mr. Janke on the phone
and he told her he intends to clean up the yard and remove the
stored material before winter. The vehicles in the yard held
current licenses. The City Attorney suggested Jan continue ob-
serving the property and gee in writting the list of things Mr.
Janke intends to do and by what date. Jan agreed to meet with
the neighbors to discuss the issue.
CASE #88 -728: Joel Dokken, (5042) Amon-Drive. Lots 8 -12, Block
4, Shirley Hills Unit 8,._D #24- 117 -24 12 0018.
City Manager Ed Shukle informed the Council that the adjoining
property owners had signed a purchase agreement to buy Lots 8 & 5
and that this item be tabled until further notice.
NOTION by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to table this item un-
til further notice. The vote vas unanimously in favor. No-
tion carried.
CASE #88 -730: Frank Buysse, property at 2017 Commerce Blvd.,
PID #14- 117 -24 14 0038.
Mark Koegler summed up this item. Resolution was prepared in-
cluding four stipulations and Mr. Buysse is aware of these
stipulations.
Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #88 -178 GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR THE "AFTER THE
FACT$$ CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT
WITHIN THE FIVE FOOT SETBACK REQUIRED
UNDER SECTION 23.71.6.1(4) OF THE MOUND
ZONINn CODE FOR AN APARTMENT BUILDING
LOCATED AT 2017 COMMERCE BOULEVARD, PID
# 14- 117 -24 -0038.
The vote was unanimously in favor, resolution passed.
CASE #88 -736: Donali R. Bonnicksen. 2539 Emerald Drive,, Lot 7,
Block 6, Shirley Hills Unit 1p", PID #24- 117 -24
12 0041,
Building Inspector Jan Bertrand reviewed this item and stated
that the Planning Commission is adding a sentence to item 3d of
the proposed resolution stating that "The variance approval is
valid for one year ". Also to add to item 3a, "The entire struc-
ture! be brought up to the current building cede standards." Mr.
Bonr.icksen is aware of these .items.
Jensen moved and Abel seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #88 -179 RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NON-
CONFORMING STRUCTURE TO ALLOW STRUCTURAL
MODIFICATIONS FOR LOT 7, BLOCK 6, SHIR-
LEY HILLS, UNIT 11B 11f PID #24- 117 -24 -12
0041 (2529 EMERALD DRIVE) P & Z 88 -736
11ob __ 2
0 Planning Commission Meeting
November 14, 1988
•
q0 -gZl
3. Case No. 88-736: 2539 Emerald Dr i v_e,__Dona 1_d R. Bonn i ckseni_
Shirley Hills Unit "B", Lot 7, Block 6 P1D24- 117 -24 -12
0041; VARIANCE: FRONT YARD SETBACK.
Owner, Donald Bonnicksen was present.
Recortmendat i on by Bu i I d i nq Off i c i a l, Jan Bertrand:
This case was tabled at the Planning Commission Workshop of Oc-
tober 24th so the Commission would have proper time to review the
case. The applicant is requesting a 8.1' variance from the
unimproved Ruby Lane access to the southwest, and a 5.8' variance
to Emerald Drive. Approval would allow structural repairs to a
nonconforming 600 square foot dwelling on an undersized 6,500
square foot +/- lot, with a nonconforming front yard setback for
the accessory building off of Ruby Lane. The long term plans of
the applicant are the acqui -`tion of lot 6 which would make the
parcel conforming, and to add on a 24' x 38' split level addition
with conforming setbacks to the lot lines.
At this time, the applicant is not requesting bringing this
structure to minimum square footage of the zoning code. However.
he has stated that his intent is to make the parcel conforming by
the purchase of lot 6. When granting a variance, the criteria
listed in Section 23.506.1 should be reviewed by tre Punning
Commission. If the variance is determined to be the minimum
variance which would alleviate a hardship to the property owner,
the following would be conditions for variance approval:
1. No building permit would be issued until the applicant would
submit proof of ownership for lot 7 and lot 6, block 6.
Shirley H411s Unit "B ".
2. The entire structure would be brought to minimum current
building code standards.
3. The nonconforming accessory building would be removed or
relocated with conforming setbacks to the property lines.
4. The applicant may continue to add onto the structure with a
future addition i.pon the condition that the addition meet
all current zoning ordinance requirements.
4 00%
.�I(A��l�
lo_gz'
Case No. 88 -736
TO: Applicant and Staff
FROM: Jan Bertrand. 6uildinq Official
DATE_ Planning Commission Agenda of November 14. 1988
CASE NO.: 88 -736
APPLICANT: Donald R. Bonnicksen
LOCATION: 2539 Emerald Drive
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 7. Block 6, Shirley Hills Unit "B ":
PID No. 24- I17-24 -12 0041
SUBJECT: Front Yard Setback Variances
EXISTING ZONING: R -I Single Family Residential
1
PROPOSAL: You are familiar with the request of Donald Bonnicksen
who is applying for a front yard setback variance to allow struc-
tural repairs to a nonconforming 600 square foot dwelling on an
undersized 6.500 square foot +/- lot with a nonconforming front
yard setback for the accessory buildinq off of Ruby Lane.
COMMENTS: The R -1 zoning district requires a 30 foot front yard
setback to the street right -of -way. Lot 7 fronts on Emerald
Drive and Ruby Lane, which are improved right -of -ways, and an
unimproved lane 10 feet wide to the southwest. A front yard set-
back is required by zoning code on the three setback areas.
However, an accessory building may be set 8 feet from the
property line with the doors facing the side property line. or 20
feet from the right -of -way with the doors facing Ruby Lane. The
applicant is requesting a 8.1' variance from the unimproved lane
access to the southwest and a 5.8' variance to Emerald Drive.
The long term plans of the applicant are the acquisition of lot 6
from the Hennepin County Tax Forfeit Division which would have a
conforming 11.600 +'- square foot parcel. He has plans drawn to
add on a 24' x 38' !it level addition with conforming setbacks
to the lot lines. However. at this time with his current
request, he would like to raise the existing house 24" on the
I�o9
•
•
GO-9Z I
CASE NO. 88 -736
present basement. install new roof truss rafters and remodel the
interior of the structure. The setback of the structure from the
curb of Emerald Drive is approximately 35 feet to the curb line
as the right -of -way has not been paved the full width.
RECOMMENDATION: The present condition of the structure and the
remodeling being requested should be considered on this variance
request. The current valuation of the building appraised for the
1988 taxes is $31,400 for the building. With the remodeling
being considered, and the future addition and combination of
lots, the value of the building will be greatly increaser) and the
tax parcel. At this time, the applicant is not requesting bring-
ing this structure to minimum square footage of the zoning code.
However. he has stated that his intent is to make the parcel con-
forming by the purchase of lot 6. When granting a variance, the
criteria listed In Section 23.506.1 should be reviewed by the
Planning Commission. If the variance is determined to be the
minimum variance which would alleviate a hardship o the property
owner, the following would be conditions for variance approval:
1. No building permit would be issued until the applicant would
submit proof of ownership for lot 7 and lot 6, block 6,
Shirley Hills Unit "B ".
2. The entire structure would be brought to minimum current
building code standards.
3. The nonconforming accessory building would be removed or
relocated with conforming setbacks to the property lines.
4. The applicant may continue to add onto the structure with a
future addition upon the condition that the addition meet
all current zoning ordinance requirements.
The abutting neighbors have been notified.
Assessment records and plat map enclosed.
2 /707
golzZ
Planning Commission Workshop
October 24, 1988
BOARD OF APPEALS:
1. Case No. 88 -736: 2539 Emerald Drive, Donald R. Bonnicksen,
Shirley Hills Unit B. Block 6. Lot 7. PID ##24- 117 -24 -12
0041: VARIANCE.
Building Official, Jan Bertrand reported that this application
was received today (October 24. 1988). however the applicant
would like the Commission to review the case and make a decision
If possible!. The Building Official informed the Commission that
Mr. Bonnicksen presently owns only 1ot 7. but plans on purchasing
lot 6 if the Commission will grant the requested variances.
Mr: Bonnicksen's plans are to raise the house 24" up from the
present basement, install new roof trusses, and remodel the
house. Following are existing problems:
e
1) House is undersized. presently 20' x 30' = 600 square feet,
the required minimum floor area is 840 square feet.
i
4
2) Lot 7 is undersized for R -1 zoning district. approximately
6.350 square feet. 0
3) Existing garage is non - conforming, presently 4.3' from Ruby
Lane.
4) House needs a 5.8' and 8.1' variance in the front yards,
presently the structure is 24.2' from Emerald Drive and
21.9' from the unimproved alley.
Mr. Bonnicksen plans on purchasing lot 6 increasing the lot size
to approximately 11.600 square feet which would create a conform -
Ing lot, and enlarge the house to approximately 2.200 square feet
which would make the house size conforming.
Dismission:
Mr. Bonnicksen was addressed by the Commission. Mr. Bonnicksen
explained he has already gutted the house, is presently homeless.
and would like to start work as soon as possible. The Building
Inspector informed the Commission that Mr. Bonnicksen did not
have a building permit to gut the house.
Mr. Bonnicksen presented building plans to the Commission, and
the g1jality of the existing structure was discussed. The Commis-
sion agreed it would be an Improvement to the area. 0
1110 2
g0AZ_I
Planning Commission Workshop
October 24, 1988
Mr. Bonnicksen stated he has to pay $6.000 in cash for lot 6 and
wanted to be sure the Commission would approve the variances
before he purchased the lot. The Commission expressed to Mr.
Bonnicksen they would like to see a signed purchase agreement
contingent upon the manning Commission and City Council approval
of the variances. The Commission discussed placing a contingency
In the motion for Mr. Bonnicksen to purchase and combine lot 6.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Thal to grant the house
size variance, and the 5.8' and 8.1' setback variances con-
tingent upon Mr. Bonnicksen buying lot 6, combining lots 6
and 7, and removing the existing garage.
iscu ion:
It was ermined the the on annot elude a ti limit fcr
the house o be ended t a conforming size.
Mr. So icksen a
sed he wou�eted.
like to ep the g
ge for
store a until the
hous is com The C fission
i ormed
him hey do not
hav contr for
building a conformin size
hous so removing
t gars could
ensure t s.
MOT1 made
y Sohi seconded
by Ne land to table
tiie case
unt the ext meeting he Planni Comm ission
an review
w h or
notification an
info tion. Moti
n carried
ImousIy
1. Shorgrand Management Ordipance
City P nner, Mar Koegler presen d a cop of a state proved
Shorel nd Managemen gulations f r the 1ty of Prior ke, and
reco(me d the Commiss on use t as a ehicIe to co inue our
investigatio into an approprf to ordi ance for t e City of
Mound.
The City tanner pro eeded to eview the Prior Lake Ord nance and
pointed out some ar s where ound's ordtnanc and this a would
be sim lar, such a on page 9. (B) SUBSTANO 0 LOTS and p ges 22
b 23. ZONING P VISIONS.
It was d ided t Planning Commission ould work as a whole
group on this Ordina . and should work _9f the Pri r Lake
draft.
3 17H
J'
Ujv1 r
•o.
F
(5$� •110- o S
•� �� �4\q�10
sis
3 1�
-
+R
X17 >> • t9 s � f
l r
yti1
S 4
V-GLEIV
Al
Vol fo
f ,
�� ���� ,1•S �(IZl E %` 2' � 1 � fo•
V � •. � ti� � � J 3 S �
•� s Ne j, ►, x ��I ° �`. • �� 1: n,; PAR
lei
to
.. - • - -,� , \� �� ^ J Iq o � �� � � � 17 /� � � `,j. lj�Of. ff S pR
Ira
,,, j k ' n 7 `��' \ \ )� t 12T' rV _ / so
all
Dig 1p
c t���l� � 'e J' \'\ � �•` ° 1170 /tiY �3,to-
,°ice, 4
' 14 13 12 a F � � �� ►: � 6 � �, I t I 1 a, i
10 ' •C`'/
lam"
/y 196
Vol.
lot
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Pr � 15050 23rd Avenue North PI; mouth Minnesota 55447 Telephone Engineers
612 476 -60?0 Planners
6t2 476 853, FAX Surveyors
June 6, 1990
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT: Driveway Aprons /Surmountable Curb
MFRA #9422
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
As directed, we have prepared an estimated cost for replacing surmountable
curb, more specifically S512 curb, with 3 foot concrete driveway aprons in the
Woodcrest area and on Ridgewood Road. For this cost analysis, we have focused
our attention on only the double driveways in these two areas since they
comprise the most concentrated number. The remaining 20C+ driveways without
aprons would be scattered throughout the City. There are certain other areas
we do not feel should be considered, since the streets were constructed with
standard 4" high surmountable curb by private developers. 'These would number
approximately 50 and are located in areas such as the Bluffs, Lost Lake and
Langdons Landing. This curb is identical to the surmountable curb used by most
other western suburbs such as Eden Prairie, Minnetonka and Plymouth in new
developments where the location of future driveways is unknown.
There are approximately 100 double driveways located within the Woodcrest
area and on Ridgewood Road. We have estimated it would cDst $900.00 each to
remove the existing curb and replace it with a depressed -urb section and a 3'
deep concrete apron. This estimated cost includes 10% contingencies and 15%
Engineering, Legal and Administrative costs and are based on a 20 foot wide
driveway. Single driveways such as one 14 feet wide would cost approximately
$750.00, of which there are 15 located in these two areas. If all the
driveways without aprons located in Woodcrest and on Ridgewood Road were to be
replaced, the estimated cost of the total project could e— ily be $100,000.00.
We can foresee a number- of problems if the City were to install concrete
aprons City wide for any property owner requesting such. For example, a vast
majority of the streets improved from 1978 through 1980 only have 30'
right -of -ways, with the back of the curb 1 foot from the pruperty line. In
order to install a 3 foot apron, the City would Peed to aquire temporary
construction easements which could dramatically increase the cost of the
project.
1)13
Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council,
June 6, 1990
Page Two
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
US.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
��d
John Cameron
'C:aju
I-�Iy
•
•
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth Minnes:>ta 55447 Telephone Engweers
612 476 -60'.0 Planners
612 476 -8532 FAX Surveyors
June 4, 1990
REC'U JUN 6 1990
Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT: City of Mound, Minnesota
MSA System Revision
MFRA #9249
Dear Ed:
The Mn /DOT State Aid Office has given the City preliminary approval to
revise their MSA system by the addition of certain streets as outlines in our
letter dated January 22, 1990, a copy of which is enclosed. Before the final
submission can be made, the enclosed resolutions will need to be passed by the
City Council. The addition of these four segments will achieve the maximum
allowable mileage.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
US.
JC:jmj
Enclosures
•
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
� "4-*;z,etOi --
/John Cameron
) 7 /.S
RESCLUTION ESTABLISHING STATE AID HIGHWAYS •
WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
that the streets hereinafte described should be designated Municipal State Aid
Highways under the provisio,,.s of Minnesota law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the streets described as follows, to -wit:
Highland Boulevard - from Bartlett Boulevard (CSAH 110) to Idl�:wood Road;
Idlewood Road - from Highland Boulevard to Ridgewood Road; and
Ridgewood Road - from Idlewood Road to West Edge Boulevard (CSAH 44)
be, and hereby is established, located and designated a Municipal State Aid
Streets of said City subject to the approval of the Commissioner of
Transportation of the State of Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner
of Transportation for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the
designation of said roads or portions thereof, that same be constructed,
improved and maintained as a Municipal State Aid Streets of the City of Mound,
Minnesota to be numbered and known as Municipal State Aid Street 112.
Adopted . 199
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor— -------_..----- - - - --
CERTIFICATION
1 nereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a Resolution
duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council of said City on
199 --
City Clerk
City of
1�)`
0
0 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING STATE AID HIGHWAYS
WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Mound. Minnesota,
that the street hereinafter described should be designated Municipal State Aid
Highway under the provisions of Minnesota law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota, that the street described as follows, to -wit:
Three Points Boulevard - from Crestview Road to Glen Eyln Road
be, and hereby is established, located and designated a Municipal State Aid
Street of said City subject to the approval of the Couissioner of
Transportation of the State of Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution to the Commissioner
of Transportation for his consideration, and that upon his approval of the
designation of said road or portion thereof, that some be constructed, improved
and maintained as a Municipal State Aid Street of the City of Mound, Minnesota
to be numbered and known as Municipal State Aid Street 106.
Adopted , 199
•
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a Resolution
duly passed, adopted and approved by the City Council of said City on
. 199
City Clerk
City of
1?/?
v
-
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
Twin Cities SL Cloud 15050 23rd Ave N Telephone Engi,ow
Plymouth, MN 612/476 -d010 Planned
55447 Facsimile surveyod
612/476 -6532
January 22, 1990
Mr. Chuck Weischelbaum
District State -Aid Enginee
Minnesota Department of Transportation
2055 North Lilac Drive
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
SUBJECT: City of Mound, Minnesota
M.S.A. System
MFRA #9249
Dear Chuck:
The City of Mound would like to request that additional routes be added to
the City's M.S.A. system The following are the segments proposed by the City
for your consideration:
1. Highland Blvd. from Bartlett Boulevard (C.S.A.H. 110) to Idlewood Road
1,070 L.F. - 0.20 miles
2. Idlewood Road from Highland Boulevard to Ridgewood Road
490 L.F. - 0.09 miles
3. Ridgewood Road from Idlewood Road to Westedge Boulevard (C.S.A.H. 44)
2,660 L.F. = 0.50 miles
4. Three Points Boulevard from Crestview Road to Glen Elyn Road
265 ',.F. = 0.05 miles
These four segments total 0.84 mile, which is 0.01 miles under the City's
maximum allowable. The first 3 segments form a connecting route between
Hennepin County Road No. 110 and Hennepin County Road No. 44. The first two
segments, Highland Boulevard and Idlewood Road, were improved in 1980 with Cit.,
funds. The third segment, Ridgewood Road, was improved in sections dating back
to the ecrly 1970's.
The fourth segment proposed for addition is an extension of an already
existing M.S.A. route. This addition would extend Three Points Boulevard to
the last intersect_ng City street.
We feel these routes meet the State's criteria for M.S.A. streets.
Enclosed for your review is a City map, indicating the proposed addition and a
half section map for better determining the mileage. Also included is a copy
of Mound's current Annual Certification of Mileage.
I19 M Equal Opportunity Empoyw
•
•
1�
•Mr. Chuck Weischelbaum
January 22, 1990
Page Two
US.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS FRANK RODS ASSOCIATES, INC.
John Cameron
JC:jmj
Enclosures
cc: Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager, City of Mound
•
C
17/7
CITY OF MOUND 472-1155
QUASI PUBLIC FUNCTION
PORTABLE SIGN APPLICATION
Portable signs used for the purpose of directing the public used In
conjunction with a governmental unit or quasi - public function. The
period of use shall not exceed ten (10) consecutive days and requires
approval of the City Counc i 1 . Signs sha 1 I be placed on the premises
of the advertised ev::nt. A permit is required, however is exempt from
all fees.
ADDRESS OF SIGN LOCATIONS k 'Lack, (� '\M4e(C 0 &Q4-
BU I LD I NG OWNERJ �� _� t_CL t<e PHONE 4?7_` I Zt� 4
NAME OF APPLICANT � PHONE -�-7 -
( if other than owner ) - -�
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS k nLILY I J1_1 Out
PLEASE INDICATE NUMBER OF SIGNS APPLYING FOR: _�9
DESCRIBE TYPE OF SIGN (materials, is it illuminated, etc.):
�
-- - 1� J --
SIZE OF SIGN REQUESTED: high x ---- wide = sq. ft..
LENGTH OF TIME TO BE ERECTED: h U 1Il q
0
DESCRIBE SAN OR REASON F �1
E REQUEST:
Applicant's 5 nature Dat�`J
Recommendation:
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON:
L�
17;,o
q7te_,
f l o c nC( &-
z.
)CIA Tina -Th (-et-- �aArxts
3) � In -WC rat Loa s+ -ic Loc<S-i on Cc-, r me-r-c_e
� a c rC55 '"��r -Len �i"anti,n>
-�arine�S
0 n 0cm" rz-q
n G S4 wcc-( C,7� O (L\ r
loo-&cU Ir1 W CW T
*'A+ Pk o �,,a, L vcj
•
CT� QVW r�
i 7,0?/
AAcCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
15050 23rd 6,venue North Plyrr wth Mmnesuta 5544
June 1, 1990
RECD JUN 4 1990
Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT: City Hall Addition & Remodeling
MF'RA #8878
Dear Ed:
T<IeF''v,nr Engmeers
612 46 6010 planners
612 4;6$` : tA} Surveyors
Enclosed is Shingobee's Payment Request No. 2 for work completed through
May 31, 1990, on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is
$57,297.34•
We have reviewed this request, find that it is in order, and recommend
payment in the above amount to the Contractor.
if you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
US.
SJ:Faju
Enclosure
t
Sincerely,
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Steven W. Jantzen/P.E., A.I.A.
W -z qn E'1 u•fi �plxrrlu nr'v f rn pi,�r�•r
•
•
•
APILICATIOI AND CIP.11fICAT9 FOR FAYNENT PAGE 1
46 CITY Of NOW FPON: SHIPGOO19 BOILDIP.S, INC.
1341 NATYOOD ROAD PPOJICT, MOUND CITY HALL At'FLFCATIO1 N0: 2
NOIID 11 55364 PIP.IOD FRONT 44/21/90
T0: 1S/31190
ANCIITICI'S 8878
TIIITIOI: CONTRACT fOR: ADDITION I P9MODEL FROJICT 10:
CONTRACT DATI: 04,09!90
------------------------------------
CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
CIAIGE 01011 SINNARY CUP,FIIT STATUS
ADDITIONS DIDUCTIONS ORIGINAL CONTRACT SON 163281.00
----------------------- NIT Of CHANGI OP.DIRS S540.00
NAL FRITIOUS 5510.11 @.of CONTRACT SON TO DATI 168151.00
--------- ------------------------------- TOTAL CONFLITID AND STORED 94133.96
THIS FIRIOD
1 DA16
-------- - - - - --
I IAIGI ORDIRS IRIS PERIOD
- -- - ------------------------- ------
TOTALS - 5501.10 0.11
NIT (RAIG9 SS00.01
FITAINAGE:
CONPLITIO WORK
STOP.ID MATERIAL
TOTAL RITAINAGI 9412.41
TOTAL EARNED LESS RITAIIAGI 84120.SS
LISS FRIYIODS CEPT1fICATIS 21423.21
CURP.EIT PATNINT CDC 51291.34
PALANCE + P.ITAINAGI 684066.45
STATE or! )'Al COUNTY Of
01 UNDEPSIGNID CONTRACTOR CIPTIFIIS THAT f0 111 EIST Of NIS INOWLEDG9 SOBSCP.IPID AID SIORI TO BEFORE ME THIS
NFOP.MATI01 AND BILIIF TIC WORE COYIPID 11 THIS APPLICATION FOP. 9r DAY Of 11,114, 19 '3C'
liTMEIT HAS 8661 CONFLITED II eCCORDANCI 1118 111 CONTRACT DOCU- NOTARY PUBLIC: �'
FITS, THAT ALL AMOUNTS 1AYI 1E11 PAID BY BIN FOR IOP.E POP. PRICK MY CCNNISSION IIPIRIS� z s r L
'IYIOCS CIPTIFICATIS FOR PATNINT 1911 ISSUED AND FATMINTS RICIIYID
RON ?.A 01199, AND ?RAT CURRENT PAINENT SNOIN IIP.IIN IS 101 DUE.
��
THOMAS L. GODLElNSK1
SHIN"EE BUILDERS INC
Notery Public. M:nnpcote
1NTPACIOR: 279 NORTH MEDINA ST. v IDREM MN 55357
�.
Wright County
COMMISSlon Expires 1.23.92
DATI,
--------- - - - - --
---------------------- - -----
PCHITICT'S CIPTIFICATI FOP PAYMENT
AMOUNT CERTIFIED ...............s
a 3ccord3ace vith th! Caatract Docaalnts, based on cs -sit!
IAttacb lrpl3s3ticn
if 3a000t clrtifild diiflrs
belrvaty ss and tboo data ccaprising the above applicatica,
frog tb! aacuot agplild
for.i
h! Architect clrtrfils to the Owalr that to the b!st of tb!
WBITICT:
:hitict s ks:vlldg!, inforaatica and bllilf the lurk has
L
rcgr!ssld 3s indi:at!d, tb! jWit7 of tb! Ncrk is in
BY: ,:�LLI- -.
:ccrdaoc! with the Ccatract Dmimts, and tb! Contractor
This clrtificat! is
act oe'etfabl!. The AMOUNT
i !atrtl!d to payalat of th! AMOUNT :EPIIFIED.
CIPTI11ED is payibl!
colt tc tb! Coatrictcr
ARCHITECT: MrConbs Frank Roos Assoc. Inc.
0 15050 23rd Avenup North
Plymouth MN 55447
naaed h!rlrn. Issu ws , payalat and acc!ptanco
of payalat 3r vitbcut pr!judfce to any rights
of the Ovolr cr Contractor seder this Ccotract.
1 ?Z3
COITI1111101 SHEET
APPLICATION AND
CERTIFICATE
FOR PATRIOT
PAGE
IRON: SIING0811 10ILDIPS, INC.
APPLICATION RUMFIR:
10: CITY Of NORIO
PROJECT: ROUND
CITY BALL
APPLICATION DATE:
0S! ?1'o@
5311 IATNOOD ROAD
PEPIOD
FROM:
01027,94
10111 11 55364
CONTRACT POP.: ADDITION / MODEL
TO:
OS/31'90
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"--
ARCRITICT'S PROJECT
NO: 4
A
------------------------------------------------------
E
C
D
•----------------
E
I
G
I
I
-
IORI COMPLETED
------------------------
- - - -- ----------------------------------------------------
TOTAL
MATIP.IAL
COMFLIYID
CAT
SCH901LID
FRIVIOUS
THIS
FRESEOTLY
AND STORED
4
PALANCE
S
10.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OI WORK
VALOR
AFFLICATFONS
PERIOD
STORED
TO DATE
CORP.
TO FINISH
P.ITAINAGE
1004
G111RAL PIQU1RE1161ITS
84439.00
14354.63
14354.63
0.0
29109.26
34
55729.74
2874 93
2072
DENOLITICR
15359.P9
010
0.01
0.00
0.00
a
15359.0'
.'.ee
2221
RICIVATIIG, BACIFILL 4 COMP
14920.1#
4990.61
4742.44
0.01
9633.90
65
5197.00
9;3.30
2513
ASIEALIIC PAVING
23800.0@
0.e0
0.80
0.00
0.ee
1
2 400.00
P.00
2611
IATIR SERVICE
12911.11
6455.08
6155.01
0.90
12910.00
111
0.00
1291.00
2851
RETAINING HALLS
5116.01
0.00
0.ee
0.00
0.00
1
5176.@9
1.A@
339#
CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE
12045.00
0.04
18011.115
0.80
19011.25
2S
54133.7S
1841.13
3415
FI:CAS1 CONCRETE
10450.40
0.90
e.0e
0.00
9.00
0
10450.04
0.e#
5121
STRICTUP.AL 6 RISC. STEEL
15052.41
4.04
15@5.21
0.04
IS05121
It
13546.89
159.52
6011
ROM CARFRNTR!
6878.90
e,@@
0.00
0.09
0.00
4
6978.0@
e,0e
6042
FINISH CAP.PEIRT Y
20045.@4
0.90
0.99
0. @0
@.40
4
20045.00
0.99
7161
BITININOUS DANPFROOIIRG
941.11
0.11
980.00
0.00
909.00
1#1
0.e4
9A.A@
7241
COIIRD IISULAIIOI SISTIM
44740.e#
0.00
0.04
9. @@
@,40
4
44740.09
0.00
7271
FItESTOPPIIG
621.0#
0.19
e.00
0.90
0.40
0
628.0@
0.09
7532
ELISTOMEP.IC ROOFING
14369.01
0.00
@.#9
0.04
1.00
4
14369. @0
0.04
1901
JO11' SEALERS
139 @.04
4.@e
@. @9
0.90
0.00
4
1 ?90.00
P.99
8111
STEEL DOORS S IMES
14180.04
0.00
2156.04
4.9e
2156.00
20
9624.00
215.6@
8211
WOOD DOORS
26S2.A0
P.ee
0.99
0.'!9
0. ea
1
2652.00
P. O1.
8351
!LOSING SLAT DOOR
1140.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
1149.00
0.11
8361
SECTIONAL OVERHEAD
2671.00
0,00
0.@@
@.1e
@.00
1
2671.00
0.00
8711
FINISH HARDWARE
8 °2'.04
4.00
0.04
4.00
010
4
8827.03
0.03
8941
GLASS 4 GLAZING
524@.0@
e.00
0.00
0.04
1.00
0
S 200. @0
0. ea
9 4/
HIM STUD SYSTIN
28517.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
29517.00
0.00
9311
MANIC TILE FLOORS
3920.e0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.e9
0
!920.09
11.00
9511
ACOISIICAL CEILINGS
3160.10
0.00
@.90
0.00
0,04
1
3160.90
0.0A
96S#
RESILIENT FLOOR
980.ee
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
@
98A.ej
n.9A
969
CARFITING
13632.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.04
0
13632.99
9914
FAINTING
18500.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0
1850 @.00
a.n0
1010
METAL TOILET COMPARTMENT
1142.00
0.04
0.04
O A@
0.00
1
1142.00
0.i0
1021@
RENAL WALL LPUVEP.S
166k0
0.00
0.10
0,00
@.e0
a
1660.00
x.92
19141
SIGNS
898.e4
0.00
3.90
4.00
0.00
0
898.00
0.00
IMP
FAPTITION FENCE
11226.00
@.0@
0 ee
0.00
0.04
1
1126.00
".t10
10672
STORAGE PACES
1068.04
4.00
0,00
0.00
1
1068,00
0.A9
11819
TOILET 6 PATH A MSS.
1530.e0
0.00
0.90
@.00
0.ee
0
153@.00
-..A0
1251:
19FIZONTAL LOOM PLINDS
990.00
@.4e
0,04
610
@.00
a
891.00
0.09
14245
HYDRAULIC ELEVATOP.S
342!3.00
0.00
0.e0
e.ee
0.e@
0
0.('!
n ,�y
.01T111ATIO1 MIT
APILICATI01 AND
CIPTIFICATI
POP. PATRIOT
PAGE 3
PP,ONI SHINGOBII PUILDIRS, IAC.
APPLICATIOI OUMBIP.:
2
°0: ROUND
ATWOOD
FROJICT: ROUND
CITY NALL
AFILICATION DATE:
05/1114
ROAD
PERIOD
?FOR:
@4 li 21,94
10111 11 55364
CONTRACT FOP.:
ADDITION I RIRODIL
TO:
0S'31190
AP.CRITECT'S PROJECT
00: 9
- ---------- - --------- ------
•- • - - - - - --
-----------------------------------------------------
A 8
------------------------------------.-_..-__-__---.-•-•-----------------------------------------------------
C
D
E
F
G
1
I
IOPF, COMPLETED
• - - - -- --------
- - - - --
------------------------
TOTAL
NATERIAL
COMILETED
CAT
SCHEDULED
FRIViOUS
THIS
FP.ESEOTLI
AND STOP.ED
If
PALAOCE
S
10. DISCPIPTIOO OF RORI
VALII
APPLICATIONS
PIPIOD
STOPID
TO DATE
CORP.
TO 110150
P.ETAINAGE
-----------------------------------------••---...-.._.--•-------------------------------------------------------------
999 BVAC
123109.90
9.09
3711. @0
9.40
3711.09
3
119989. @4
•- - - - - -- •.
371.14
5449 FLINHIG
25115.99
0.0@
1200.15
0.00
128F.15
5
244 °.6.15
12P.99
SS @4 PI26 FP,OTICTION
18599.99
4.99
9.99
1.90
4.99
0
185V.0
3.0:)
401 ILICTP.ICAL
51595.@@
i.00
51f9.S0
0.09
S1fa.V
1@
SIQ25.50
51f.QS
7044 OVIRRIAD 6 FROM
s440.9@
4'7,). @0
417@.99
0.99
954x.@9
18
43460.@0
954.130
--•------••-----------•-----------------------------
- SIITOTAL - ORIGIOAL CONTRACT
763291.49
•------------
34419.23
- - - - --
63663.13
-------•-------------------
4.94
91113.96
•--------------------
12
669153.04
- - - - -- --
9413.11
------•-----------------------------------------•------------------------------------•----------------------------------------
HAIGI
R.DIP.S:
NGI ORDER 11
5599.90
4.99
0.99
9.09
4.0@
@
5540.00
@.,9
..-------•----------------------•-----•---------•-----------------------------------•-----
SUPTOTAL - CHAOGI OP.DIP.S
-----------------------------------------•-----------•------------------------------••---
MOM
4.09
0.90
0.94
9.90
•------------------------
•-------------------
0
5599. @@
- - -
- - - - -- --
0.10
- -- - - - --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------•------------------------•------------------
- - GPI,ID TOTALS • -
------------------------------------------•-----•------
168181.09
3441 @.23
•----
63663.1:
•------- ••-
@,09
•-- •- -• - - -- -------------------------
941'.3.9f
12
f74653.04
•--------------
9113.41
- - - - --
s
A5
0
(1Il(11 VA \I)
June 12, 1990
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL t,(
FROM: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
RE: JTEM i11 - CHANGE ORDERS - CITY HALL ADDITION AND
REMODELING
On the agenda for this evening are change orders. Change Order 14
involves the building out of the two remaining overhang areas of
the city hall. These areas are on the west end of the city hall
building, on both the north and south sides of the building. The
price submitted by Shingobee Builders, the City's general con-
tractor, is $13,500. There will be additional charges for the
electrical connection cabinet, air conditioning unit and natural
gas line in the utility room area which Fran will have for you
tonight.
The rationale behind adding this change order is basically due to
two factors: 1) architecturally the building would look better
if it was squared off equally, 2) additional office space and
storage space would be available.
This item was considered by the Citizens Task Force early on in
the design of the addition and remodeling. Steve Jantzen,
architect, had indicated that in order to keep the cost down, the
squaring off of the building could be eliminated. This was prior
to the bid process, before we knew that the construction costs
would be below the estimate. Since we were able to get a below
estimate bid, I believe it is important to consider this idea as
it would provide a total of 280 additional square feet.
I envision the area added on the south side of the building for
an additional conference room and/or future office space.
Additional office space would be required if the City Council
approves one or all of the ordinances that is pending before the
Planning Commission on housing maintenance. The rental housing
program and a housing maintenance code for single family
dwellings will certainly involve additional staff, either on a
El
contractual basis or on a full time status with the City. Also,
annually, I am contacted by graduate schools in public
administration who are looking to place interns with the City. I
have had to turn them down because of a lack of office space.
Interns provide assistance to city staff on research projects,
while preparing themselves for a career in public administration.
On the north side of the building, the utility room area would be
increased for additional storage space.
The following is a summary of the original contract amount and
change orders that have been approved or are proposed:
Original Contract Amount
Change Order #1 (already approved)
Change Order #2 delete reflectorized signs
(fire station /city hall - to be done later with
wooden signs)
Change Order #3 (to be considered later)
Change Order #4 squaring off of overhang
areas of city hall
Change Order #5 removal of exterior siding
and add 3/4 inches of foam insulation
(to be considered later)
Change Order #6 Construction project sign
Revised Contract Amount
$763,297.00
+ 5,500.00
- 798.00•
- 1,000.00
+ 13,500.00
+ 3,400.00
- 300.00
$783,599.00
Please understand that you are approving Change Order Nos. 2, 4
and 6. Number 4 is an add, while 2 & 6 are deducts.
By approving Change Order #4, at this time, we will take
advantage of an opportunity to have the building looking better
in terms of architectural design as well as providing additional
office and storage space. To come back at a later date and try
to do this change order, would certainly be more cost than what
is being proposed no*►. John Cameron, city engineer, will be
present at tonight's meeting to review this matter further with
you. If you have any questions, they can be directed to John.
FS.ls
If'
f �
*Living wi
�Asaociated Preaa
th smoker increases
ew 'r ork, N.Y.
onsmokers who live with smokers
,'have a 20 percent to 30 percent high -
r risk of dying from heart disease
,char do other nonsmokers, a re-
'alarcher said Sunday.
9 Passive smoking causes heart dis-
' IW and the number of deaths due
.to hart disease is 10 times the num-
2ber due to cancer ,•' said Stanton
Glantz of the University of Califor-
Zlia at San Francisco.
In remarks presented yesterday at the
World Conference on Lung Health in
Boston, Glantz said research is begin -
ning to show exactly how cigarette
smoke alters the heart, blood and
arteries to increase the hart-disase
risk. He presented a study in whieb
he reviewed others' research on the
subject.
In his 1986 annual report on smok-
ing and health, the U.S. sur'eon �o
eral concluded that passive smoking
causes lung cancer in nonsmokers. At
that time, the evidence was inwfS-
cient N link passive smoking with
,. The National Weather
heart disease, the report said.
Newer studies have changed that,
Glantz said.
"The evidence that passive smoking
causes heart disease is stronger today
than the evidence was in 1996 that
passive smoking caused lung cancer,"
he said.
Glantz's study was released a week
after the Environmental Protection
Agency said it soon Will declare envi-
ronmental tobsoco smoke a known
ateinpgen. The EPA eonoluded that
risk of death from heart d
each year passive smoking causes
3,000 cases of lung cancer, a usually
fatal disease. Glantz said passive
smoking am awn 32,000 heart -
disease deaths per year,
"The heart-0isease deaths oombinod
with the an= deaths make passive
smoking the third leading cause of
preventable death, behind smoking
and alcohol," he said.
Glantz is a researcher and statistician
who conducts research in cardiology,
has written two textbooks on biosta-
tistics and serves on the California
t
State Scientific Review Panel on tox-
ic air contaminants.
His collaborator in the study, Dr,
William Parmley, is a cardiologist,
chief of the division of cardi at
University of California at San Fran-
cisco, and a past president of the
American College of Cardiology.
The Tobacco Institute, which repre-
sents cigarette makers, said the sur-
geon general had failed to find proof
that passive smoking causes heart
disease.
;a
iseas e-
Brennan Dawson, a apokawoia
for the institute, said there have belb�
only thw.. studies since the surrstie
general's 1986 repots, "and they�
tinue to support the corxlusilt.
that there is no proven link bety
passive smoking ani heart disease + '
Glantz d1t
rand 30 p�et�t;issrat#Id. «;
�.. ..
SEEK &
MARKETPLiACIE
exece'�;
'• +n•t . f t ^a.; -ti?A ,ir.• •IE>�'lit� � 1.'�,
For W orkers Shamus if"
ft Nant,1 zv,t ta►iA
sw! dt" WM&seKst.1OUW . F ** " .'s,4 Ott at j• sxt
MW' li$it1p81am 10.1.1ism" E }
Jd asst WS' MM to ; a tam"
sett `'b ao ooe• IUt, f>tradra
eaa rnrte • a fw 1pbttt n ttftllle�aflrleae► '
rea��Od t kaltbM MW OD 0 O OW
., ar•� +std. ,,,i,
—* save
Ce t 1112 : bw
a major goat #
of ft wetlpeae prasram don by one— .
asd "PW &0 been out
,� resat tlr , ' a,
Jdoad� tit �ahrata► Ida
program arlw/{�all per fbyy 140. ad No" low a* ,, ft
CheCltllpa sal MCs01'ra`!� Aetlt eatitK noes' ,.•„_I_ nor rs
and exercise babita, b ='a00 per em• �„,,,
Plow. t�npbyN Oroe►se�r � � .e,.r , � whlsls. � ;, x .:: ,
J&J is one of only a handdw of compa-
nies So ice TM �w°'MOw,►wNrsh."w'". "" •':""" """ `'' " `.
that have rude canprekMve exam-
inations of the costs and benefits of their ro ' y a �Coura�ed to
programs. It b precisely because of ifils coats spurted an estimated X8096 at JO elm• restroottri• ?fwy tre even 1 to
lack a hard data that many other f tff s- Ilar companies that J&J tracb to deter- drop hints to fellow workers about oaing
rate wellness programs are vulnerable hcot to mine Its own wage and compensation weight or giving up smoking.
cost-cutting pressure, one expert says "In o levels. Last year, J&J says, it spent $83.5 • W„'ve developed an environment
a rough economic climate, one t the first million on medical costs, up l0% from where it's OK for a worker to sRy. John,
things that n cut la i health program or a 1988. That compared with a 20% rise at the you're putting on a few pounds, " says
wellness program," says Roger Reed, who other 30 concerns. John S. Brown, J&J's vice president of em-
wellness
supervises wetness programs for Blue The wellness program has been enough ployee relations. Mr. Brown should know.
Cress and Bha "M of Indiana. "Tbe to a succea teat J8J began It because De,�1u OtbW
reason is a lot of we11ne1tr� admta• P
tatratora haven't done a of tdocu• .� qry!� W P
meatir� tM rsaulta. to about b o0eapaaNib�a • j
That hasn't been dw em •ft Joianroa a
,►oh . - W study toofc tbl'aa y�rt and
involved &A paWws was � .« Jm .
uNted as the compaq� world expert- P096 M, but am ra
:neat wftb a new dM. WWh botA a teat ao oat ao . lidlrard
group sad a caatrd� .�� via preMdent of TaoaMOO lire it coW
aud�af 5,.011 worker at am
ev arl� r:N�/iwaDr� w tiro`
to pve it a
d Oiler wt% *9 ON of �
Own. 110
a°V� it bec tttere't t
second year, K >it t� for the company." 1r a thtt
third year. It a tml* to pay
back the losses do I t year. GYM$, Ca1odu and P=xU do � f
Health -rare costs at Johnson & Johnson, At Johnson & Johnson's headquarters
'A. .. "_. The 2nals of the program are prett
Johnson & Johnson
`Wellness' Plan Shows
Healthy Bottom Line
Continued From Pnge to
basic: Stop smoking, eat more fruit and
fewer fatty foods, get some exercise, and
buckle up your seatbelt.
"The way you change the health of the
whole pQpulatlon is to get the whole popu-
latW td make small changes In a lot of
areas,." says Mortis S. Wilbur, a Johnson &
Johnson executive who helped write a
study on the wellness program.
The program, called Uve for Life, is
vo!untary. Employees Joining the program
receive a 19 -page questionnaire, part of a
health -risks profile. They must ponder
such questions as these:
How to your fop y times week do you add salt
How many flights of stairs do you climb
a day'
Have people ever annoyed you by criti.
cUft your drinking'!
How many close friends do you have?
(The question on close friends is pan of a
section examining the employees meatai
health. If responses to several of these
gVISU s bdlk s tb- person is suffering
from depression. be or she mW be W
ferrad for further couaseUag.
The campkted questiatmaffe is hrmedi-
aiely analyzed by =WAer, wkiich pints
OWL n response that prints out areas where
employe av not have healthy habits.
A nut acUtioner then goes over the
results o, survey with the employees,
takes then bic vt ensure and tests their
pulse whUe ide an exercise bicycle.
The que; .,,...aalre and the session with
the nurse can produce big results in them.
selves. "That kind of face- to-face educa-
tion is m4be the most imp)r; ant part of
Live for We," says David Calkins, an as.
s6.ant professor at Harvard Medici.'
School, who has done research on health
promotion. In fay!, a Johnson & Johnson
study found that employees got about half
V)a �
the benefits of the wellness program just
by going through the health risks profile.
After the profile, Live for i.ife tries to
Persuade employees to act: to exercise,
watch their diets and lose weight, to quit
smoking; or to do whatever else might be
called for. Signs to hallways and brochures
sent to employees promote various pro-
grams, and workers win prizes for partici.
pacing. Employees are asked to stop in for
follow -up health -risks profiles.
The information garnered from the
questionnaire is confidential between the
employee and the company's medical de.
partment. "I think the levels of participa.
tion would not be anywhere as high if we
had not paid attention to this Lssue of confi.
dentialtty," says Dr. Herrmann.
Thos to Work out
Uve for Ufe now is available to all
35,1100 J &J employees in the U.S. At head-
quarters here, nearly two-thirds of the
workers participate to some degree. The
average employee, for Instance, exercises
In the gym nearly twice a week.
"ome have no desire to participate. ,I
e., what I want. I eat as much as I want,
an(A my weight stays the same." says Her-
bert Brown. the 56- year -old security super-
visor. as he PIAWW Off a plate of bacon
MW eggs in the company cafeteria. And.
come bmchttme, there are plenty of em-
ployees ordering cheeseburgers.
Those cheeseburgers have had their er-
WL During the company's three -year
study, the average employee with access
to the wellnes: program lost only Omit a
Pound more than other workers. The re-
sults are typical of most weight- reduction
Programs. health experts say. It's not that
tough to get people to lose weight, but It's
very hard to keep them from putting the
pounds back on.
Smoking, however, is a different story.
Slightly less than 2007, of J &J employees
currently smoke, down from about 305, in
the late 1970s. "If you can get people to
stop smoking. you make a big hit in a vari-
ety of risk factors." says Frank H..arker,
a vice president.
The problem is that the people who still
smoke are hard-r( -e, ,_ommitted puffers.
The company is taking the next s.ep by.
May 15, 1990
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL`
FROM: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
RE: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON "NO SMOKING" POLICY
At the City Council meeting of April 24, 1990, we discussed the
proposed "No Smoking" policy. The direction following the dis-
cussion was to obtain further detailed costs and designs for
designated smoking areas in the Island Park Garage, Municipal
Liquor Store, Public Works Garage, Fire Station and City Hall.
In addition, I was supposed to look at the design and cost of
ventilation of the interview room in the new Police Department.
Attached is a letter dated May 1, 1990, from Steve Jantzen,
McCombs, Frank Roos, regarding the designated smoking areas in
the five city buildings. Basically, the letter indicates that
the five buildings above were examined for the possibility of
providing designated smoking areas by combining new partitioning
and /or mechanical systems.
As the letter states, the fire station, Island Park garage and
municipal liquor store do not have a practical or cost effective
solution to adding designated areas. However, the new Publi.;
Works Facility and the City Hall do have possibilities whi :h
Steve has outlined in his letter.
It would appear that the policy could exempt the fire station,
Island Park garage and the liquor store from requiring a smoke
free settI - ng. Or in the case of the fire station and liquor
store, send persons outside the building and in the case of the
Island Park garage, send them to the Bland Park Hall, which has
already been exempted from the policy. The fire station perhaps
could include a designated area at some future date when an
additional bay may be added to the north side of the building.
Initially, when we calculated the range of $1500 to $3500 for the
mechanical systems in each of the five buildings, we came up with
a Uotal of $17,500. However, after we viewed each building for
options, we found that to do $17,500 plus redesigning rooms
1749
and /or offices, it becomes impractical to even go any further.
There just isn't any space available in the fire station,
municipal liquor store or the island Park garage to construct
designated areas. In conclusion, we basically have the
following:
1. City Hall for approximately $3000 could include a
designated smoking area.
2. The Public Works Facility basically has ventilation
equipment which is designed to handle truck exhaust and
welding smoke. There would be no cost involved.
3. The Fire Station - designated area outside or exempt
it.
4. Municipal Liquor Store - designated area outside or
exempt it.
5. Island Park Garage - designated area outside or in
Island Park Hall.
Steve Jantzen is supposed to supply me with additional cost and
design information with regard to the interview room in the new
Police Department. That should be coming by separate letter.
With regard to cessation programs, I checked with the Minnesota
Coalition for a Smoke Free Society 2000, and spoke to the
executive director of that organization. He first stated that
90 -95% of the people that smoke quit smoking on their own and
don't need a program. I found this quite interesting.
Nevertheless, he gave me information about several different
programs:
1. Hypnosis - $150 for three days in one week, one hour
for each program.
2. Hypnosis Learning Center - self help type of course,
$175 for a complete program which includes two sessions
plus home audio /video cassettes.
3. Acupuncture - clinical approach, $35 for the first
visit, $25 for follow up, 2 -3 weeks in duration.
4. Hennepin County Medical Center, one -to -one type
program, $75.
It appears that the range could be anywhere from $50 up to $175
per person.
The American Lung Association also listed several programs in
addition to acupuncture and hypnosis:
1. Electric shock and rapid smoking
2. Physician's advise
3. Nicotine gum
4. Live in programs
5. Self help approaches
6. Group programs
/ 730 2
The Minnesota Coalition for a Smoke Free Society 2000 also
provided a list of questions to ask in choosing a program:
1. Does the program offer a variety of components to
address cessation Lad its maintenance?
2. Does the program continue after quitting? Will it help
you cope with pressures or urges after you quit?
3. Does the program emphasize lectures, group discussion,
participant helping each other, or what? bow will you
fit in with this approach?
4. Do the program sponsors pretend that their program
contains the one, special, "magical" procedure that
will do everything for you?
5. What evidence does the program offer to show that it is
well run and effective? Does it only offer a few
letters from "satisfied customers" which can almost
always be found to support any activity? Does the tone
of its promotional material suggest greater interest in
profits than in helping people? Are exaggerated claims
made?
6. What are the credentials of the program staff? Is the
program sponsored by a recognized educational, public
health, medical, or civic organization? If hypnosis is
being used, is it being provided by a licensed or
certified professional in psychology, psychiatry, or
social work? If rapid smoking or nicotine gum are
being used, is appropriate medical back -up available
for pre - treatment screening or referral during
treatment?
7. Does the program staff have contact with the general
professional community so that they can refer you for
medical or stress problems which might come up during
the program?
8. Does the staff relate to you in a professional manner?
Do they acknowledge that no single program is right for
everyone? Do they offer to refer you to other programs
in the vicinity? Do they make you feel that they are
interested in your welfare?
9. Do the program components give you a positive feeling?
Does it appear to meet your needs as you perceive them?
10. Does your employer or health care plan offer a program?
Do they offer discounts or pay -backs for success?
11. Is it possible to offer a program at your worksite?
12. What times of the day is the program offered?
13. What are the minimum and maximum numbers of
participants the program can accommodate?
14. What is the success rate of the program? How is the
success rate determined and verified?
I hose this provides the information you requested based on the
last discussion on April 24th. As you know, it is still my
position that we adopt the original policy for smoke free
munic-pal facilities. I have attached information that I have
received subsequent to the last discussion we had on the policy.
The information is as ,'ollows:
1. An article titled, " Survey Says Nonsmokers Suffering
Silently" published in the April 25, 1990 innea op lis
Star Tribune.
2. A letter dated May 2, 1990, from Doctor Mark E. Brewer,
business owner, resident and Economic Development
Commission Member, giving his thoughts on the proposed
smoking policy.
3. An article entitled, "Clearing the Air, Timberwolves
Ban Sales Ads Puffing of Tobacco" written by Jim
Klobuchar, May 9, 1990 Minneapolis Star Tribune.
4. An article entitled, "Companies Kick the Habit of Work
Place Smoking" published in the May 14, 1990 City
Business Newspaper.
5. Article entitled, "No Instant Solutions to Hazards of
Second Hand Smoke" published in the same issue and /
adjacent to the preceding article in City Business
Newspaper.
My understanding is the Council will discuss this matter this
evening at the Committee of the Whole Meeting and will place the
item back on the agenda at its regular meeting of May 22nd for
official action. If you have any questions, please contact me.
ES:ls
J ,C._
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
X5050 23rd Avenue N(r-n P ymeut^ Minn «,srta 5544 Telephone Engineers
6'2 4E -5010 Planners
6',.' 46 8532 FAX Swr e,ors
May 1, 1990
Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager RUT MAY 2 1990
City of Mound
5361 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT: Designated Smoking Areas
City Buildings
MFRA #9366
Dear Ed:
This letter presents our conclusions after examining the five City
buildings by yourself, Kenneth Dowell of EXE Associates and myself. The five
buildings in question are the Fire Station, old Public Works Garage, Municipal
Liquor Store, new Public Works Building and.tity Hall. The buildings were
evaluated for the possibility of providing designated smoking areas by a
combination of new partitioning and /or mechanical systems.
The Fire Station contains no existing space, which can be designated
exclusively for smokers without discriminating against non - smokers. Adding a
room to the exterior of the building would be impractical a..d expensive.
Should the Fire Department add a repair bay in the near future, a room for
smoking can be included at that time. The old Public Works Garage contains no
space which can be partitioned, as this would further limit the already cramped
quarters. In this case, we suggest using the old Island Park City Hall for the
smoking area. The Liquor Store is also too spacially restricted to build a
smoking area and there is no possibility of building an addition. The repair
bay of the new Public Works garage can be used as the designated smoking area.
The ventilation equipment in this area is already designed to handle truck
exhaust Iding smoke so exhausting cigarette smoke should not be a
problem. coking room can be easily added to the City Hall Addition in she
office exi :ion area. Access can then be provided from the existing
breakroom. The cost for a change order to do this work would be about $3,000.
We hope this information is of assistance. If you have any questions or
need additional information, please contact us.
SJ:jmj
Sincerely,
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
zt �' �t__ �_� '"""'
I
I
Steven W. Jantzen, .E. A.Q.A.
An Equal ()ppcvin nity E,rpl()yt,r
/? 33
RTO MAY 4 1990
1003 1011 DIVIIJ ItIN of I I ;aU I *" 0 M -
May 2,1990
To: Mayor and City Council
City of Mound
Mound, MN 556364
Re: No Smoking Ordinance
I .-
As a health professional in this town I strongly support and urge the passage of the
ordinance to restrict sm oking on city property.
This is a priority that is being confronted and implemented statewide at the present
time and would be exemplary of Mound's efforts to be progressive and "with the
times ". Both large and small businesses and cities are taking active efforts to help
reduce one of the m ajor factors of America's biggest killer...... heart disease.
It is also a cost effective measure as demonstrated by many industrial studies
indicating 1) reduction in lost time benefits from sickness, 2) reduced insurance
costs, and 3) increased employee productivity.
In reference to the new addition to City Hall, I have enclosed a copy of an article on
SBS or the Sick- Building Syndrome. I would urge you to look at these issues also.
If you should hav a any questions regarding this, please feel free to contact me.
Yours in Heal %,
Mark E. Brewer, D.C.
Business Owner
Resident
Econom is Dev elopm ent Com m ission Mem ber
MEB /bk
Enclosure
NealthUne
THE SICK- BUILDING
SYNDROME
AND WHAT YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT
uildings, like people, can
become sickly. An esti-
mated 25% to 35% of U.S.
buildings are considered
"sick," having what is
known as sick- building syndrome
(SBS). They contain areas in which up
to 35% of em floyees, according to the
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), suffer from acute discomfort or
congestion that is relieved only whey,
they leave the premises.
When SBS was first diagnosed in the
early 1980s, many observers dismissed
it as hypochondria, irritability or merely
the result of on- the -job boredom. Yet
prolonged exposure to indoor air pol-
lution can result in skin irritation, re-
spiratory problems and other ailments.
Nationwide, millions of buildings
could be affected to some degree.
Nearly 25% of the work force nas re-
ported indoor air - pollution ailments.
The annual cost in sick days and med-
ical expenses (attributable at least in part
to SBS) is estimated at $3 billion.
The EPA studied 10 buildings in five
eastern cities and found significant
quantities of eight volatile organic com-
pounds in all sites. The noxious fumes
were emitted by wall moldings, adhe-
sives, caulk, paint, carpeting, furniture,
cleaning solvents and other common
building materials.
Less easily detected are irritating
fumes from solvents. Ventilators often
spew bacteria and mold. Such organ-
isms can find fertile breeding ground
in air - conditioning and heating systems
that are turned off at night and week-
ends to save energy.
Some of the characteristics of a sick
building seem to start with its energy
efficiency. Airtight windows and super-
BY TOM JENKINS
thick insulation are common.
The typical sick building (if indeed
there is one) was built in the 1970s. It
has low ceilings, low - frequency strip
lighting and lots of glare (poor lighting
may cause headaches). It often has
badly positioned air vents in the ceiling,
and lots of people and equipment. More
public buildings tend to be sickly than
private ones.
The SBS threat is creating a new field
of building diagnosticians. These spe-
cialists (architects, biologists, and
health and behavioral scientists) dis-
cover a puzzling spectrum of problems
Ll tainted office environments.
Investigators question workers about
air quality, space layout, lighting and
acoustics. They collect and analyze air
samples, inspect areas with fiber -optic
instruments, and crawl through venti-
lation systems, looking for mold and
pools of stagnant water.
A National Institute of Occupational
Safety & Health study of 529 sick build-
ings showed that about half of them had
poor ventilation. The remaining problems
were a combination of (1) bad air coming
from the outside, (2) specific inside
sources, and (3) microbes, such as mold
and fungi. Abo included in the second
group were volatile substances and par-
ticulates from fabrics.
Another study team interviewed
4,373 workers in 46 buildings in Great
Britain and found that in buildings that
wcrkers rated the most healthful, there
we -e windows that could be opened.
while the "sickest" buildings had sealed
windows. Yet, in an air- conditioned
building, sometimes the air is fresher,
as measured by the carbon- dioxide lev-
els, than in a naturally ventilated one.
To overcome these problems, sick-
building analysts recommend a new ap-
proach to office- building construction.
They believe that buildings should be
designed for those who work in them,
and that windows should be designed
to be opened. Offices should be spa-
cious, well lighted and well ventilated.
For example, the headquarters of
Scandinavian Airlines in Stockholm and
Nederlandsch Middenstandsbank in
Amsterdam are arranged like streets.
The bank is a series of 10 towers with
the street curving between the towers
at ground level. Both structures are de-
signed to admit as much natural light
as possible, avoiding the usual rectan-
gles of most buildings.
Other suggested office- buildin6
changes include decentralized HVAC
(heating, ventilating and air- condition-
ing) controls that give temperature
choices back to the occupants. Raised
floors in many buildings allow instal-
lation of HVAC systems that allows em-
ployees to direct airflow from a vent.
Ventilation housed in a ceiling tends to
push back into a room pollutants and
dust tha: rise naturally with hot air.
Computerized personal environment
modules let workers individually adjust
lighting and mask adjacent conversation
with a pink -noise generator. When the
user leaves his or her work station, a
sensor automatically turns down all sys-
tems to conserve energy.
The solution to the sick - building syn-
drome can be as straightforward as
cleaning air intakes, filters and ducts.
Remedying such problems can serve as
an opportunity to reduce absenteeism,
increase productivity and cut costs.
Tom Jenkins covers the business scene
from Englewood, Colo.
� Otf,ce Systems '90 lonuory
I 735
1 �3L
Clearing the air
Timberwolves ban sales,
ads, puffing of tobacco
The Timberwolves went over the
heads of their accountants to spare
ibe lung of their customer Tuesday
AM banned all tobacco advertising,
sties and smoking is their new $94
itillion arena.
The praidest of the pru basketball
dub gulped u bard as the
a000tmtants. The Timberwolves
e Metrodaae shr gatowds u bh
are looking at
rl s71 minion nor taco
town Min
The decision by the team's owner
will oat them an estimated W.000
b MM,000 a year in advertisiz& a
perifice the dab's pesideat, Bob
Jim Kk*mchlllkr
Stein, said was "worth a lot of agony
at a time when were looking A a
huge building debt."
But what they were bearing Tuesday
were cards of gratitude tom
smoking opponents, tom the kderal
government on down, for a decision
that may be without precedent in a
moor league athletic areas in
America.
Itlabseher continued on page I 5
Btsr TtbtnsMkdrtaadryimay W1990 Sol"
C,,d.W 6. pap lA
"T hi: a are stadiums that ham
$molts or don't al c4umes or
don't take t *wca allvatiaisl, but as
far as I know nobody u bigothmi
athletics has dame dos
banning adverdaiag, sales and
Cell to sf D+swe Con Davis of
ti,
U.S. Department of Heath and
Human Services.
He congratulated the dub owners,
Harvey Ratner and Mary Wdkmon,
for resisting money tom an industry
that spent $gt million in advertising
and sponaonhip connected with
glamour sports events in I M.
WoMenson, an old -AKm millionaire
who would have a bard time looking
heroic rescuing Gol6loeb and the
lost sheep on the same day, said his
wile, 5=, probably deserves as
much ore . t as he does. "1 never
smoked a 2!= is my hk, but
She's the one who's adamant about it
She sari why worry about the
money. So Pm not worrying abet
the money - taucb."
Stein, however, is the man in charge
of bottom lines for the ban dub. He
may be worrying more that Ratner
Mid wolkmat, and certainly a lot
more than Sandy. He trod be was
neutral in the deliberations.
"Time will tell whether the
economics of this will work out
Tobacco and beer are the big
advertisers in athimcs. What we lose
in tobacco advertising we literally
won't gas back. But the community's
concerns matter, and each step we
take we try to rr.f w that Harvey
and Mary sat down, and raid some
thing arc more important than
money."
be" Wolknson was asked
someddim die. Isn't the tobacco ban
ore oh6pnos.the dub boa to the
eommtmtty, m view of the direct and
indirect subudies the arena a getting
tom the city of Mia meepow?
"People cant about subsidies," be
said, "but what we're doing is
making use of the audit' of the city of
Minneapolis to sdl bonds. The city
would lose only if it went undo, but
it won't We figured the building
originally would coat a Gale more
$70 minion plus another s 12 million
or so for the beahh dub. ht's up to
more than $80 million now for the
basketball psrl of it It's a tougt Out
The tobacco money would have
helped, but those people arc right It's
somethiOg we fed we owe the
Minnesota community, which has
led is so many wazs to promote
beam and titueas.
Wolkason admits that the arena is
being Overbuilt, pertly to vreet the
design criticisms of architects and
am= ticketholders. Stein predicts
that the dub will lone some aeon
ticket buyers now that they have
been an off tom smoking. It's not The
likely Tim b Tae many* expect total
union ticket ales of some 15,000 for
the 11,500 -seat arena.
None of then- will be role to smoke,
even Boston's cu' w -puffing old lion,
Red Auerbach, if and when be shows
up in the arena.
Give Red a brat instead of '
when be coma to MinneapofiL
If the Celtics clinch the game, instead
of asking for a match be an ask for
mustard.
But some duap are almoM the $amt
as money. If Bob Steia is talking
about bealth, for example, he's also
talking about money lo the Ratma-
Walfeawn partnership ZTse taro
have been hugehy usooeadul is the
operation of a tinier of Twin Cities
beahh dubs. It put them iO a
ppoo�s�tioa to bid first on the Minnesota
T.nas and thee, afkr Carl Pohlad
acquired the baseball team, to invest
in a new National Basketball
Association fiattehise and their new
downtown Minneapolis arena, an
athletic Roman Forum with kv
rivals in luxury and diversity. V wing
be the basketbW team's perms t
home beginning is OeWber and
shelter the largest and mast degant
health dub in Minaeaota,
So when the Timberwolves admitted
they were consideria4 buying tobacco
advertising and opening pan of the
arena to smoking, the antismoking
fora: asked a question.
"What would as apnr� tics that
was bush on health be doing
advertising a product that kiss and
nipples and is the enemy of heath?"
Stein's answer then was that Utopia
exist in mythology but act the
jungles of the National Basketball
Aasociatioar
WoWnson was lets poetic. "We just
decided tobacco didn't belong in tbia
Imo"
Whether it belongs in most of the
' other arew, it's thee. Siam as
{� � television
increasingly aG4sed itadf with mina
spectator athletic both as a spomor
aid as adveniw.
"With TV gone as a kgitiaute
advertising forum," Davis said,
"tobacco advertisers want to get inu-
athletic areas and will pay premium
prices for certain locations that
attract the cameras. By linking
themselves with popular sports,
they're also going even more after the
youth market That's why the
Timberwdves' decision to prohibit
smoking, tobacco gala and tobacco
advertising in their utilities shows
kraigbt and courage."
Maybe, said Jeannie Weigum of the
Association for Non - Smokers of
Minnesota, "It will be a pioneering
step in braking that marketintGnk
between athletic and tobacco. The
Metropolitan Sports Facilities
Commission, which rum the
Meuodome, took a comparable step
several years aqo by ban future
tobacco advenuing there after
groanim at it couldn't retake up the
diflere But the ban takes effect
with d - :tart of the baseball season
in 1992, and the Metrodome has
never been in better financial shape.
Smoking is still allowed in the
Metrodome concourses, suites and
prat box.
The Timberwolves arena, however,
is being described u totally srnoka
free. Anything else would have nude
Wolfenson and Ratner and their
health clubs look patently
sanctimonious about promoting
H
C
D
Z
>t
cr
'ails .
Cl) IRE
�•j ,
r . Y
� a7i. .._ t M
C O C Q
., .� E
a A-g
.
L Jag
4) I a o
"
t
0 all,
Cn=
1 73 7
C ,
Q
r.
O
3
0
U
W
"
tic�-
1
* 1 E12tI
if-11Ey
9 =�
Pt� � 3
7
_
V� .. a r5 all 11 fill
- i
Mod CH
- E �a � ' >�
Ali ME L 4 1
gg
y a a Nfl ;wit
No instant solutions to hazards of secondhand smoke
The cod of maintaining air-claisaing equ and the health particle and gaseous. Mod air cleaners work on particle podul-
haxards of secondhand smoke are major= in companies' ants but not the gaseous pollutants unless they contain special
smoking-poheydeeWons. media such as activated carbon or sJuminuza.
In a weU-pubhdzed 1986 report, former Surgeon General C. A variety of cleaners are available: mechanical filters Wmd-
Everett (Coop warned that passive smoke Inhalation con cause to a furnace Rltw; electric air deaners, which trap charged per-
lung cancer in non-smokers. IU report marked nationwide ticles usInS an electrical fidd. ion generators, which spet by
concern about secondhand smoke, which contains 200 poison- charging the pard" In the room; mW hybrid device, which
out chemicals, including formaldehyde, DDT, carbon moon- un a combinationof the abovequahtle.
ideand-rowk s PotooW buyers &=W beaw9setho Im stoesconpw
Mwe are t" typo jif iew dhs smoki-. malashowi s4 r whl& an bmg ;XAZ ami UN&
-.4 tram. xn* & what 4 smokes '01141" y tssced Wmila of oampe wM dattw rubber
taking a anii hop A clSibr* This more
poeyateet tw "'t have
It-;Ong" Much wowhk:h is of 00111 1
A 1990 U.S Environmental
�aatld air deanery cites cc M4W J10* MM * W,
hoard' most are noisy ewe If run at tow v6aiciaa
.4qtants, In order of their I IF OC"M I$ 9trC%ap
� %q maintemom *blob mboamah.
.;VMUW spl�V%q
_�O"UanUWODSX.
AWw
the EPA Weii nd KiUW floi
idystaQ,
!-&sin& Owtsibis unit, used In*
i":h t)w air flows between
Ot of
littleornovalt;
. . . e.' .. ' * '4. �T
41 . . osi000 amloe cliewns two types Of nq*" CN& SOnMg
McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
150550 23rd Avenue North Plymouth Minnesota 5514'
May 15, 1990
Mr. Ed Shukle
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 5536+
SUBJECT: Mound City Hall Addition and Remodeling
MFRA #8878
Dear Mr. Shukle:
Teleohone Engineers
612 476 -6010 "fanners
612 476 -8532 FAX Surveyors
I spoke to Kenneth Dowell of Exe Associates today and he estimated that the
cost of the extra ventilation for Interview Room 105 would be about $250. This
would allow people being interviewed to smoke without affecting people outside
the room.
The cost is minimal since there is a proposed exhaust duct nearby and the
modification is a part of the new construction. Please notify us if wish to go
ahead with this change.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
US.
SJ:aju
D40
Sincerely.
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES. INC.
Steven W. Jantzen, P A.
An Equal C4g)ortunity Employee
•
•
•
•
0
( ` ( l ( l r l 534! MAvWOOD ROAD
\ Jf `1 ` ! �T. ,, `/ MOUND MINNESOTA 553b4
X6'2 472 -1155
April 24, 1990
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ED SBUKLE, CITY MANAGER
RE: PUBLIC BEARING - PROPOSED NO SMOKING POLICY IN ALL
CITY BUILDINGS
I thought it would be helpful for you to have some additional in-
formation with regard to the proposed no smoking policy.
In developing this policy, I researched it quite thoroughly and
made contact with the League of Minnesota Cities, Research
Department. The League sent me a packet full of information
which has sample policies from cities all over the United States.
Specifically, there was information from cities and counties
provided to me by the League. I took this information and
developed the policy based on my observations of how smokers have
affected non - smokers in relationship to the work place. I looked
at the policy in terms of all city buildings so that the policy
vu;_!d be fair to all employees and 'visitors who use, City
facilities.
n addition, City vehicles and other types of City equipment are
co a certain extent an extension of the office or department that
the employee works out of. I felt it was important that these
areas be also be free of smoking. The policy also provides for a
designated area (outside on the grounds) for those who want to
smoke; but only during regularly scheduled work breaks.
This policy was not developed on a whim, nor is it. intended to
harm or injure anyone. As the basic purpose states: "The City
of Mound is committed to providing employees and visitors with a
safe, healthy, and clean working environment. The City is
committed to maintaining this type of environment and minimizing
exposure to health hazards that are caused by smoking.
Therefore, it is the intent of this policy to eliminate smoking
within the City of Mound facilities."
The policy was developed through research. A great deal of the
policy was developed through information secured from the City of
Chaska and the City ox Woodbury. Recently, I received additional
1741
Memo to Mayor and City Council
April 740 1990
Information from the Lea-gue of M! 'Iresota Cities about oi.her
cities who have adopted no smoking policies as total baps. Those
bans have expan;ed to counties around the state as well as
municipal utilities i.e., electric, gas, etc. Cities and
counties that I have found recently are Hutchinson, Shakopee,
Madelia, Grand Rapids (ice arena), NortVield, Minneapolis, St.
Pauit Fillmore County, Olmst I County, Beltrami County, Fairbault
County, Washington County, Cass County.
It is interesting to note that the League of Minnesota Cities had
a partial ban on smoking until recently when; they adopted a
policy for total ban in the League offices.
I also contacted Steve Jantzen, McCombs Frank Rooi, to see if he
could get some information for we with regard to installing a
ventilation Pysttm in a roon in each of th^ city buildings
affected by the policy. He worked with Ken Dowell, EXE and
Associates, our ■*comical engineer on the City Hall project, to
see what could be done and the estimated cost of doing the
•ientilatior. system. Steve assumed that we would be looking at a
150 square foot room. To do just an exhaust fan would be
approximately $1500. To completely ventilate the room, i.e.,
supplying air, heating and cooling it and exhausting it to the
outside, would be approximately $3500. These are basically
technical type costs which does not include removing any wnlls or
redesigning rooms or offices. To do additional work beyond the
technical system, would require additional funds. Bgsed on this
information, if you took $"x500 and multiplied it by 5. because
there are 5 building affected, the cost would be $17,500. One of
these buildings, i.e., the liquor store, is basically two rooms -
a display area and a stock room. You wo•..!.d have to be creative
in trying to divide up the square footage area to allow for a
smoking room.
I indicat4d previously that we would be able to achieve a 10%
reduction in workers compensation rates if less than 10% of the
fire fighters and police officers smoked. This would amount to
approximately $3000 per year based on the 1990 premium. This
would be an annual reduction tn the premium. The proposed policy
certainly assists in trying to achieve `he 10% reduction in
workers compensation premium.
It is obvious to you, since I have developed the policy, where I
stand with the policy. I believe the City must take a leadership
role on this is sue. To c,tange it further, i.e., suggesting
designated tress within buildings is ludicrous and Costly.
ES:1 s
2
,s.
J
RISOLDTION W. 90 -
RsSOLUTION APTROTIMO R "NO SVOKINGN POLICY FOR Tn
CITY OF NOUND PRCILITI28
MRUS, the demand for no smoking in the workplace has
been evident since 19750 when the Minnesota State Legislature
created the Minnesota Clean Indoor act; and
wMaRSAS, the Surgeon General C. Evertt Roop, in 1986,
issucl a report which clearly indicated that smokers and non -
smokers cannot be separated effectively in the same air space;
and
•YSRtiS, the City Manager has researched the
!easibility of implementing a "No Smoking" policy for the City of
Mound facilities; and
!tlRRaS, the City Managjr has looked at a number of
icommunities that have adopted "No Smoking" policies that rarge
from total bans to smoking in designated areas; and
E.
WORM, the City Manager is recommending that smoking
ne banned from the following City facilities:
City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road
Public Works facility, 5468 Lynwood Blvd
fire Station, 2413 Wilshire Rlvd
Island Park Garage, 4843 Manchester Road
Municipa: Liquor Store, 2324 Wilshire Blvd (leased facility)
and
WXzRER8, the City Manager is recommending that
employees, while they are operating and occupying City owned
vehicles and ecp!ipment, will be prohibited from smoking; and
1
17V3
WEIRIAd, the City of Mound is committed to providing •
employees and visitors with a safe, healthy and clean working
environment, and is committed to maintaining this type of
environment and minimizing exposure to health hazards that are
caused by smoking.
•Ow, TIRRIFORS, DS IT RSAOLVSD, that the Mound City
Council hereby adopts the attached "No Smoking" policy as
prepared and recommend.i by the City Manager in its entirety.
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Attest: City Clerk
17gY
2
Mayor
•
•
CITY(A MOUND
MEMORANDUM
DATES March 22, 1990
TOs Mayor and City Council �.
FRONs Ed Shukle, City Manager
SUBJECT: Proposed "No Smoking Policy" - Some Minor Changes
After the Committee of the Whole Meeting held March 20. 1990 1
have made some minor changes in the proposed no smoking policy.
1 am recommending that the Mound Bay Park DePot, 5801 Bartlett
Blvd., and the island Park Nall, 4845 Manchester Road be deleted
from the city facilities list In terms of the no smoking policy.
Both of these facilities are rented facilities that are not con-
sidered to be formal work places 1 1 ke the other facilities
listed. Also, 1 have added another exception under the
"Exceptions" provision. Annually the Fire Department conducts a
fish fry and two bingo events. 1 am recommending that the policy
be waived for those three events only, at the Mound Fire Station.
Other then those above recommended changes, the policy that was
discussed March 20th remains the same.
Attached is a resolution approv,ng the no smoking policy as
presented with these new changes. if you have any questions*
please contact me.
ESspJ
•
7K5
DRAFT DRAFT
CITY Of MOUND 0
Proposed "No Smoking" Policy -
lE 1m1n2tIna Smoking In the Work Place
The City of Mound is ronimitted to providing employees and
visitors with a safe, healthyt and clean working environment.
The City Is committed to mmintalning this type of environment and
minimizing exposure to health hazards that are caused by smoking-
Therefore, it is the intent of this policy to eliminate smoking
within City of Mound facilities.
QEF1NI Nt
"Smoking" is defined as carrying or possessing any "lighted"
tobacco product including cigars, cigarettes, and pipes.
Y:
Tobacco use 1s not permitted by anyone at anytime while utilizing
City of Mound facilities and equipment. These facilities are
listed under the heading of "Applicability" below.
AEM I CAS ILiTY:
This policy applies to all person- while utilizing the following
city facilities:
City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road
Public Works Facility• 5458 Lynwood Blvd.
Fire Station. 2415 Wilshire Blvd.
Island Park Garage, 4843 Manchester Road
Municipal Liquor Store, 2324 Wilshire Blvd. (leased facility)
In addition, this policy applies to all persons while they are
cperating and occupying city owned vehicles and other equipment.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
This policy becomes effective at 12:01 a.m.. September I.
EXCEPTIONS:
Any person who wishes to use tobscco may do so outdoors on the
grounds of city facilities. Employees are allowed ,.J smoke out-
doors during regularly scheduled break times. If employees are
I I U
scheduled to work outside of regular work hours, i.e. attendance
at an advisory commission or city council meeting, etc.,
employees can smoke outdoors during the break times of those
specific meetings.
Police statistics indicate that persons who are being interviewed
by police curing an interrogation process, are more likely to
provide needed Information that the police are seeking when they
feel relaxed or comfortable. Therefore, if the police department
is interviewing or interrogating a person(s) and the person(s)
must smoke Caring the Interview, that person(s) may do so within
the secure interview room only.
Three events held annually at the Mound Fire Station ores fish
fry and two bingo nights. The no smoking policy Is waived for
these three events only at thc: Mound fire Station.
POLICY ENFORCEMENT:
Employees who are found in non - compliance with this policy will
be subject to disciplinary procedures as outlined in the City's
Collective Bargaining Agreements and Administrative Code.
All visitors will be Instructed not to smoke In the oforemen-
tioned facilities. The responsibility of reminding visitors of
the smoking prohibition will fall upon city employees who are
conducting visits with the person(s). Visitors who violate this
policy will be asked to extinguish the smoking materials if the
visitor continues to smoke he /she will be asked to leave the city
facility. Services will not be provided to visitors who violate
this policy.
Minnesota Statutes 609.60S and 609.681 state that persons who
smoke in a "no smoking" area are guilty of a misdemeanor.
SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAM:
The City of Mound will provide the opportunity for employees to
quit smoking. The city will send employees who smoke to a cessa-
tion program. Employees will pay the enrollment fee, but will be
eligible for reimbursement based upon the following:
NMQ SMOKING F WMBURSEKENT
after six months 50% of cost
after one year remaining 50% of cost
In addition, employees will be allowed to attend such a program
• during regular work hours, If necessary.
177
OTHER PROCEDURES: 0
The City of Mound w I I I post "NO SMOKING" signs In appropriate
locations at the aforementioned facllltias.
Outdoor ash recept•cIas w I I I be placed to appropriate locations
on the grounds of the aforementioned facllltias.
�7-
•
M.
P
PETITION FOR RECYCLING
WHEREAS, the City of Mound Recycling Program was commenced in
1985 as an effort to: (1) lower the amount of waste cur
community deposits in landfills; (2) reduce the
consumption of ever - diminishing raw materials; and (3)
decrease the energy and pollution associated with the
manufacture of new glass, metal,and newspaper products;
WHEREAS. the City of Mound, by instituting weekly pickups and
publicizing the importance of recycling, has made an
excellent effort to encourage our citizens to recycle;
WHEREAS, approximately two- thirds (656) of our community have
yet to participate in the recycling program on a
voluntary basis;
WHEREAS, protection of the environment is of the utmost
urgency and demands immediate action to minimize further
degradation;
WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington has a mandatory recycling
program in place that fosters 906 participation;
WHEREAS, citizens of our community desire to increase
recycling participation and believe that mandatory
recycling may be the only practical way to do so;
WHEREAS, the current recycling contract for the City of
Mound expires on December 3:1, 1990;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned petitioners request that the
Mound City Council take the following action:
1. Initiate a formal study of the environmental and
economic impacts of a mandatory recycling program and
any other program that could increase participation.
(This study should be completed by October 1,1990.)
a. Commence a mandatory recycling program by January 1,
1991, if the formal study deems it appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
jt4p yam-
s 1��d
z
170,Y 7�.co ,� 5'5`36' x/
3 /yo s/ c�� y J-4-1 G Y,
'`�� /ate �� ��a.,.�— �33� ��Y „ -•;o/` �--:•� �� %[Yr,.r -/ �S"36�
5 Toff
��r��� •303"7 �3�Gr+� G� �.0t.�ti r2 s.S'3c•(t
SG yi v*'a
1�01� :5.1 P A*0V4 ss-s6
17YIIV.=.r.-- 5
t
. PETITION FOR RECYCLING
WHEREAS, the City of Mound Recycling Program was commenced in
1985 as an effort to: (1) lower the amount of waste our
community deposits in landfills; (Z) reduce the
consumption of ever - diminishing raw materials; and (3)
decrease the energy and pollution associated with the
manufacture of new glass, metal,and newspaper products;
WHEREAS, the City of Mound, by instituting weekly pickups and
publicizing the importance of recycling, has made an
excellent effort to encourage our citizens to recycle;
WHEREAS, approximately two- thirds (65%) of our community have
Yet to participate in the recycling program on a
voluntary basis;
WHEREAS, protection of the environment is of the utmost
urgency and demands immediate action to minimize further
degradation;
WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington has a mandatory recycling
program in place that fosters 90% participation;
WHEREAS, citizens of our community desire to increase
recycling participation and believe that mandatory
recycling may be the only practical way to do so;
WHEREAS, the current recycling contract for the City of
Mound expires on December 31, 1990;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned petitioners request tiNt the
Mound City Council take the following action:
1. Initiate a formal study of the environmental an'
economic impacts of a mandatory recycling program and
any other program that could increase participation.
(This study should be completed by October 1,1990.)
1. Commence a mandatory recycling program by January 1,
1991, if the formal study deems it appropriate.
�jG � 2360 �inJ /LCQ � R ZoSfoYc c�•'mitted,
rc�r
i.� Qa,�n•,
0,4
01 C
1�am �fA A I
&�._� C35y a.,,4. 1., A4t.4J.
S & a 4a Ou, I/
16wk ci&�
1 X50
•
•
• �f
PETITION FOR RECYCLING
WHEREAS, the City of Mound Recycling Program was commenced in
1985 as an effort to: (1) lower the amount of waste our
community deposits in landfills; (2) reduce the
consumption of ever - diminishing raw materials; and (3)
decrease the energy and pollution associated with the
manufacture of new glass, metal,and newspaper products;
WHEREAS, the City of Mound, by instituting weekly pickups and
publicizing the importance of recycling, has made an
excellent effort to encourage our citizens to recycle;
WHEREAS, approximately two - thirds (65 %) of our community have
yet to participate in the recycling program on a
voluntary basis;
WHEREAS, protection of the environment is of the utmost
urgency and demands immediate action to minimize further
degradation;
WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington has a mandatory recycling
program in place that fosters 90% participation;
WHEREAS, citizens of our community desire to increase
recycling participation and believe that mandatory
recycling may be the only practical way to do so;
WHEREAS, the current recycling contract for the City of
Mound expires on December 31, 1990;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned petitioners request that the
Mound City Council take the following action:
1. Initiate a formal study of the environmental and
economic impacts of a mandatory recycling program and
any other program that could increase participation.
(This study should be completed by October 1,1990.)
2. Commence a mandatory recycling program by January 1,
1991, if the formal study deems it appropriate.
J,
11
,- f 4P�,S'Cf1
/i
V '
w
( . / %) ( /j� / V -
Respectfully submitted,
)�}iZTLI7� }L� l�
i'
?
L� 1: L
i
r�
PETITION FOR RECYCLING
WHEREAS, the City of Mound Recycling Program was commenced in
1985 as an effort to: (1) lower the amount of waste our
community deposits in landfills; (2) reduce the
consumption of ever - diminishing raw materials; and (3)
decrease the energy and pollution associated with the-
manufacture of new glass, metal,and newspaper products;
WHEREAS, the City of Mound, by instituting weekly pickups and
publicizing the importance of recycling, has made an
excellent effort to encourage our citizens to recycle;
WHEREAS, approximately two - thirds (65 %) of our community have
yet to participate in the recycling program on a
voluntary basis;
WHEREAS, protection of the et�vironrnent is of the utmost
urgency and demands immediate action to minimize further
degradation;
WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington has a mandatory recycling
program in place that fosters 90% participation;
WHEREAS, citizens of our community desire to increase
recycling participation and believe that mandatory
recycling may be the only practical way to do so;
WHEREAS, the current recycling contract for the City of
11nun(I expire-, on December 31, 1 990 ;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersign,d petitioners request that the
Mound City Council take the following action:
1. initiate a formal study of the environmental and
economic impacts of a mandatory recycling program and
any other program that could increase participation.
(This study should be completed by October 1,1990.)
2. Commence a mandatory recycling program by January 1,
1991, if the formal study deems it appropriate.
Rc.anart fill IV c111-bmitta,i
PETITION FOR RECYCLING
WHEREAS, the City of Mound Recyclinq Prwjram was comm,�ncr -d in
1985 as an effort tu: (1) lower rho- amount, of waste Our
community deposits in landfills; ( : ?) the
consumption of ever- diminishinq raw nlat"rials; and 3i
decrease the energy and pollution aasociatc d with, th-
manufacture of new glass, metal,and newspap, -r produ,:ts;
WHEREAS, the City of Mound, by instituting weekly pickups and
public -zing the importance of recycling, has made an
excellent effort to encourage our citizens tq recyc.l._-;
WHEREAS, approximately two - thirds (65%) of our �_ommuni ty h,ivt:
y,lt to participate in the recycling program on a
voluntary basis;
WHEREAS, protection of the environm,-nt is of th, utmost
urgency and demands immediate action to minimize furt;er
deqradation;
WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington has a mandatory recyelin,t
program in place that fosters 90% participation;
WHEREAS, citizens of our community desire to increase
recycling participation and believe that mandatory
recycling may be the only practical way to do so;
WHEREAS, the current recycling contract for the City of
Mound expires on December 31, 1990;
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned petitioners request that the
Mound City Council take the following action:
1. Initiate a formal study of the environmental and
economic impacts of a mandatory recycling program and
any other program that could increase participation.
(This study should be completed by October 1,1990.)
2. Commence a mandatory recycling program by January 1,
1991, if the formal study deems it appropriate.
� 1
i
F
� n
i,
Respectfully submitted,
,t 1
BILLS - - - -- -JUNE 12, 1990
•
BATCH 0053 82,233.09
BATCH 0054 181,558.13
Westonka Foods Supplies 86.92
Water Specialists Salt 144.55
TOTAL BILLS 264,022.69
•
•
7SI
NOE I
PURCHASE JOURRAL
All 3/9
AP- 002 -01
CITY OF HM
TILE 9.1
VINmt
INVOICE DUE HOLD
PRE-MID
WE
W. INVOICE RN4Ttt DATE DATE STATUS
ANOINT
DESCRIPTION
A00011R RNINER
MOW
ow • 10-
10319
PREPAID
620.66
LID
71- 7100-9510
5/31/90 5131/90
620.66
JNDL -CD
1010
W."
am
PIE -PAID
895.74
LID
71-7100-9510
5/31/90 5/31190
895.74
JW-CD
1010
855.74
3008 5/2
RA31mY CORPORATION YBW TOTAL
1476.40
00888
PRE -PAID
3,701.00
CR UNION 5/12 PR
01-2040-0000
5/31/90 5/31/90
3,708.00
J/1L-CD
1010
3701.00
30536 5/1
PREPAID
3,108.00
CR UNION 3/26 PR
01-2040.0000
5/31/90 5/31/90
3,708.00
JK-0
1010
3708.00
3094 5/3
CIO COUNTY CREDIT UNION YOM TOTAL
7416.00
CO120
PRE -PAID
10.00
P/C CAR PLATES
01- 4190 -4140
2.30
P/C PMTAOE
01.41W3210
10.00
P/C CAR PLATES
01- 4010.4140
6.00
P/C RETAILERS LIM
01- 4040-4120
11.40
P/C RWJ11QN0
01- 0o-2200
26.85
P/C ICECREAH -CLEKIF DAY
01-4320-2200
18.95
P/C ROLLS
01-402"120
5.60
P/C POSTAGE
01-40!0.3210
.80
P/C ran
01- 40!0.4140
2.92
P/C PARTS
01-4210-2310
5/31/90 5/31/90
95.02
AL-0
1010
95.02
3OW 5/1
CITY OF MAD
YENDOI TOTAL
95.02
00999
PIE -MID
225.90
JANE LIFE INS 5/12 PR
01- 2040 -0000
5/31/90 5/31/90
223.90
JAL-0
1010
226.90
30562 5/1
CNE CIAL LIFE
INS CO VENDOR TOTAL
425.90
C1001
PRE-MID
2,349.00
SIT 5/12 PR
01-2040 -0000
5!31/90 5131/90
2,349.03
J W-LD
1010
2349.03
30649 5/1
PRE -PAID
2,3"0.22
SIT 5/26 PR
01- 2040 -0000
3/31/90 5/31/90
2,370.22
AL-0
1010
2370.22
30687 5/3
CO ISSIONER OF REVENIE VENDOR TOTAL
4719.25
11219
PREPAID
317.98
33.5 CONTRACT HM
81- 4350 -3100
5/31/90 5/31/90
317.58
JR L-CD
1010
317.58
30612 Sr,
DBJFRT RUDOLPH
YEW TOTAL
317.58
01235
PRE -PAID
JANE DENTAL
01-2040 -0000
_,.1,716.00
16.20
JANE DENTAL- RETIREE
01-4190-1510
41.60
JANE DENTAL- WTIREE
01-4280-1510
41.60
JANE DENTAL - RETIREE
01- 4140 -1510
57.80
JANE DENTAL - RETIREE
71-7100 -1510
5131/90 5/31/90
1,433.20
AL-0
1010
1433.20
30601 5/3
KTA DENTAL
VENDOR TOTAL
1433.20
005-3
3oryr- 3 e
(i *'%--
is
11 s.z
CITY COUNCIL PACKET 6/12/90 #2
u
•
•
PALE 2 PURCHASE JOURNAL
AP-0O2-01 CITY Won
VEIOdt twit.[ DUE w
NO. IMAICE M DATE DATE STATUS MGM DESCRIFrIlON
01342 PIE -PAID
5/31190 5/31190
0111100 AIGIUM COP Yew TOTAL
E1429 PIE -PAID
5/31/90 5/31/90
PRE-PAID
5/31/90 5/31/90
GRIODS COOPER i COPWP VENDOR TOTAL
H2120 PRE -PAID
5/31/90 5/31/90
HUM CO DEPT OF PROPERTT T VENOM TOTAL
H2145 PRE -PAID
5/31/90 5/31 /90
132.63
5/31/90 5/31/90
a PHILLIPS 1 5016
YB00t TOTAL
6179D
P9E-PAID
382.08
5131/90 5/31/90
GRIM SI96
YEMOOR TOTAL
aim
PIE-1AI3
1,183.44
5/31/90 5/31190
1,365.50
F9E-M
101.15
5/31/90 5/31/90
WEAT WEST LIFE A8811YI1M YM TOTAL
61971
PIE -MM
AL-M
5/31/90 5/31/90
PREPAID
DEPOSIT FOR SIN
5/31/90 5/31/90
WaF WEALTH PUMA
VEIDOt TOTAL
G1972
PIE -PAID
5/31/90 5/31/90
GRIODS COOPER i COPWP VENDOR TOTAL
H2120 PRE -PAID
5/31/90 5/31/90
HUM CO DEPT OF PROPERTT T VENOM TOTAL
H2145 PRE -PAID
5/31/90 5/31 /90
132.63
ILEAM RS
132.!3
JIL-CD
132.63
382.08
LID
615.00
VINE
11.64-
DISC
1,183.44
Al.-CD
1,365.50
LID
101.15
VINE
27.31-
DISC
1,439.34
AL-M
2624.78
300.00
DEPOSIT FOR SIN
300.00
At-CD
300.00
1,135.00
DEF COP 5/12 Pit
1,135.00
AL-CO
1,153.00
DEF CORP 5/26 PR
1,135.00
JIK-CD
2310.00
268.8)
JI1E HDEP 5/12 PR
268.87
JWWL-0
21.80
HOW 5/26 PR
21.80
JRIL-CO
290.67
124.50
LIO
441.44
NINE
18.84-
DISC
18.29
FRT
375.94
Nil
941.33
JRK-CD
941.33
215.00
EAM MT-TI FFT 1311724120176
215.00
JK -CD
215.00
288.46
OED 5112 PR
288.46
AL-CD
CATE 5f
TINE 9.:
PIE-PAID of
ACCOUNT MW MINT CNEO( f W
22-4170 -2230
1010 132.63 30602 5r.
71- /100-9510
71-7100 -9520
71- 7100-9560
1010 1185.44 30675 5/.
71-7100-9510
71- 7100-9520
71- 7100-9560
1010 1439.34 300 5!-
01- 4320-2200
1010 300.00 30665 5/;
01- 2040 -0000
1010 1155.00 30314 s/:
01- 2040-0000
1010 1135.00 30692 5/"
01- 2040.0000
1010 268.87 30319 5/
01-2040- 0000
1010 21.80 30697 5/'
71-7100 -9510
71-7100-9520
71-7100 -9560
71-7100-9600
71- 7100.9540
1010 941.33 30573 5/.
01-4320-3310
1010 215.00 30567 5/
01-2040-0000
1010 288.46 30651 5/:
1753
PAGE 3
PURCHASE JOURNAL
BALE S/:
AP-002-01
Cln OF RQ10
TOE 9.1
YEW 'MAICE DUE HOLD
PE -PA18
OE
NO. INVOICE NNllfl DATE DATE STATUS
MOUNT
DWUP1101
ACOLNT wo
mw
OEM D DA
PRE-KID
268.16
ED 5/26 PR
01- 2040-0000
5/31/90 5/31190
208.46
JRIL-0D
1010
'1.46
io 5f
HE?N CO S"T & COLLEC`T+ YOM TOTAL
576.92
12301 PRE-MID
512.90
ION IEF COUP 5/12 PR
01-2010.0000
5/31/90 5x1/90
512.90
JRNL-0
1010
512.90
30552 5/1
PRE -PAID
512.90
ICO DEF COP 5/26 PR
01-2010-0000
5/31/90 5/31/90
512.90
JRNL-0
1010
512.90
30M 5C.
ICIIA RETIRE M TRUSTAY YOM TOTAL
1025.60
12303 PRE -PAID
75.00
10II1 CONF-T1
01-10104400
5/31/90 5131/90
75.00
AL-0
1010
75.00
30571 5/.
ICr& HIEING BUREAU YOM TOTAL
75.00
12304 PRE -PAID
91.98
1CHR 5/12 PR
01-2010-0000
5/31190 5/31/90
91.96
JRNL-0D
1010
91.98
303 5/1
PRE -PAID
91.98
ICIN 5/216 PR
01- 20100000
5/31190 5/31190
91.98
AL-0
1010
91.98
301 5/:
ION RETUE7ETT TRUST -101 YOM TOTAL
183.96
J2571 PRE-0AID
539.20
80 CONTRACT NI/RS
01-43103100
5/31/90 5/31/90
539.20
AL-CO
1010
x1!.20
3& Sr.
JIM TAM VEWOt TOTAL
539.20
J25M PIE-PAID
2,83!.74
LID
n•nao -Lilo
705.00
NINE
71- 71009',170
63.86- DIE
71- 7100950
5/31/90 5/31/90
3,180.88
JILL -CD
1010
3010.68
30674 5r.
PRE -PAID
1,437.34
LID
71-7100 -9510
520.60
NINE
71- 7100 -M
34.02- DISC
71- 7100 -1,f60
5/31190 5/31/90
1,973.92
JRNL-CD
1010
1913.92
30679 5/.
AwA BROS MU.ESALF Lit VDOOt TOTAL
5404.80
L2817 PRE -PAID
44.00
LELS DUES
01-2040-0000
5131 /90 5/31 /90
44.00
JRNL-CD
1010
0.00
30600 5r
LAW ETFOACFIENT LABOR SER# VOW TOTAL
44.00
83051 PRE -PAID
10,310.73
FIT 5/12 PR
01-20100000
5/31/90 5131/90
10,310.73
JRNL -CD
1010
10310.73
30648 5/'
PRE -PAID
10,354.97
FIT 5116 PR
01-2040-0000
5/31190 5131190
10,354.97
JRNL-CD
1010
10354.97
30686 5/:
HARDI1fTTE BANK - 1UM VOW TOTAL
20665.70
f r'
7.S.SS
PADS 4
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE
5/:
AP -M-01
CITY OF TWO
TIME
1.1
YB6pM
INVOICE ME HOLD
PIE -MID
CNE
NO. INVOICE MBet
DATE DATE STATUS
KUNT
DESCRIPTION
Acmes OVER
mm
ow •
DA
•
N3090
PREPAID
1,316.56
WAP 5/12 PR
01-2040-0000
5/31/'90 5/31/90
1,316.56
JK-CD
1010
1316.56
30660
5/1
PRE -PAID
97.84
H!!!R' 5126 PR
01-2040 -4000
5/31/90 5131/90
97.84
JK-CD
1010
97.81
30596
5/a
TED CBM HEALTH PLAIT YENDOR TOTAL
1414.40
mm
PRE -PAID
173.50
IVA 5/12 PR
01-2040-0006
5/31/90 5/31/90
173.50
AL-0
1010
173.50
30661
3/1
M OMIT AM
Yom TOTAL
173.50
1239101
PREPAID
288.00
DEF COPP 5/12 PR
01- 2040 000
5/31190 5/31/90
288.00
JTNL-0
1010
211.00
30655
5/1
PRE -PAID
288.00
DEF COTP 5126 M
01-2040-M
5131/90 5/71/90
288.00
AL-CD
1010
28B.00
30693
5/:
HN RETI(EW SYSTEI YENDOR TOTAL
576.00
83455
PRE -PAID
645.65
L320 DIES
01-2040-M
5/31/90 5/31/90
645.65
AIL-M
1010
645.65
30699
5/`
HN TWISTERS LOCAL
320 YB0OM TOTAL
645.65
83320
PRE -PAID
68.05
FOS%rW WTER CMDS
73- 7300 -3210
66.06
PDBTG -VTR HETBI CARDS
79- 70003210
5/31/90 5/31190
136.11
AL-0
1010
136.11
30366
5/:
PRE -Mill
64.15
POSTG-1MTR BILLS
73-7300-3210
64.16
POSM -NTR BILLS
78-76003210
5/31/90 5 /31/90
128.31
JK-CD
1010
124.31
305M
Sr
M UND P0MW67ER
YONOH TOTAL
264.42
83631
PRE -PAID
562.50
JUNE Ma 5/12 PR
01- 2040-M
13.00- MY CREDIT- W-ERTRAND
01-41901520
5131/90 5131/90
547.58
JRL-CD
1010
547.56
30665
5/.
WTUAL EYUIT LIFE YOM TOTAL
547.58
P3950
PRE -PAID
6,466.72
PEAA 5/12 PR
01- 2040-4000
5/31/90 5/31/90
6,466.72
AL-0
1010
6466.72
30560
5/'
PRE -PAID
6,492.04
PERA 5126 PR
01- 20400000
5!31/90 5/31/90
6,492.04
JNL-CD
1010
6492.04
305M
5/
P E R A
YOM TOTAL
12958.76
P4030
PREPAID
7,389.88
JUTE PHP 5/12 PR
01-2040-4000
299.50
JUNE PHP RETIREE
01-41401510
5/31/90 5/31/90
7,689.38
JK-CD
1010
7689.38
30558
5/
PRE -PAID
494.12
PMP 5126 PR
01- 20400000
5/31190 5131190
494.12
JK-CD
1010
494.12
305%
3C
•
7.S.SS
PAGE 5 PURCNASE JOURNAL
W- CO2 CITY OF ROUND
Yom INVOICE DUE HU
NO. INVOICE Mrt DATE DATE STATUS AIWR DESCRIPTION
PWSICIANS OF NN VEIODtt TOTAL
94171 PRE -PAID
5/31/90 5131/90
PRE -PAID
5/31/90 5131/90
DUALITY Vilk L SPIRITS ADOR TOTAL
84200 PREPAID
5/31/90 5/31/90
R L IOIIGDAW l ASSOCIATES YOM TOTAL
84239 Pm -PAID
5/31 /90 5x31 /90
AW RT E JUM Yeem WOOL
54311 PRE-PAID
5/31/90 5/31/90
PREPAID
5/31190 5/31/90
STATE CAPITOL C UNION YOM TOTAL
54630 PRE -PAID
5/31/90 5131/90
91°ERANERICA VEPOOR TOTAL
W520 PRE -PAID
5/31190 5131/90
NESTOKA CNANNI'ER OF COIER VENDOR TOTAL
iDTAL Ai: VENM
8183.50
521.09
LID
10.42-
DISC
510.67
JIK-CD
918.09
LID
189.35
NINE
20.78-
DISC
50.85
NI1
1,137.51
JIK-m
1648.18
200.00
LID LIAB-FISN FRY
200.00
JRNL-CD
200.00
688.64
64 CONTRACT HDIiL9
688.64
JRNL -CD
688.64
508.92
CR ANION 5/12 PR
508.92
JIK-CD
M.92
Ot UNION 5/26 PR
508.92
JRNL -CD
1017.84
779.93
tWt,APR GAMINE
34.61
W, APR GASOLINE
32.22
NAR,APR GASOLINE
173.98
WAR GASOLINE
187.47
W,APR GASOLINE
297.49
IWt,APR GASOLINE
1,333.38
W.APR GASOLINE
25.74
VCR TAPES
17.16
TAPE
2,881.98
JRNL -CD
2881.98
6.50
DWNBEEA ITT;
13.00
C1WfER Fn
19.50
JRH.-CD
19.50
82,233.09
DAIS 5/
TIM 9.1
PIE -PAID OA
Amm NUNN7t Nw OED( 0 DF
r�
L_J
71-7100-9510
71-7100 -"W
1010 510.67 30676 5/:
71- 7100-9510
71-7100 -9510
71-7100-9560
71-7100 -9510
1010 1137.51 30581 5t-
22-4170-3610
1010 200.00 30666 5/
01-4340-3100
1010 688.64 3068;1 5/:
01- 2010-4000
1010
508.92 30557 5/'
01- 2040-0000
1010
508.92 5/'
01-4280 -2210
01-4290 -2210
01-4190-2210
01-4340-2210
78- 7800-2210
73- 7300-2210
01-4140-2210
73-7300-2200
01- 4270-2200
1010 2881.98 30677 51 .
01-4140-41
01- 4040 -4129
1010 19.50 30564 Sr
p o S3
1 � 5�
)?S2
PAM 1
PURCNASE JOURNAL
DATE 6/t
AP-CO2-Ol
CITY OF MUD
TIME 13.`
YEW R
INVOICE ME NR.D
PIEfAID QE
MD. INVOICE ON
DATE DATE STATUS
K UN7
IIEStRIPT10N
ACCOUNT NURN R
mw QED( 8 BA
AM
475.00
SM
73 -7300 -4200
650.00
.MD-LAIM M
78-1190.0000
6/07/90 6/07/90
1,125.00
J K-CD
1010
AM UAW 4 LA10SCAPING VENDOR TOTAL
1125.00
A0060
6.63
E)AFLIFES
01-'740-2100
6.65
SWELO'EES
01-4090-2100
7.34
OWELMES
01-4140-2100
6.64
EINEIMES
01- 4190-2100
6.64
DAIEIO'ES
01- 4340-2100
3.32
BAIELIFES
01- 4280-2100
3.32
ElFA OPES
71-7100-2100
3.32
EIAIELWES
73- 7300-2100
3.32
BAN LIVES
78- 1800-2100
6/07/90 6/07/90
47.20
J K-M
1010
AIRO-Nli
VEIW TOTAL
47.20
80539
45.36
OAOUT
01- 4290-2230
6/07/90 6/07/90
45.36
jK-CD
1010
BATTERY i TIRE Wff
, IMC VOW TOTAL
45.36
10610
4.12
MT 01TfEJN
73- 7300 -rW
4.13
MAY OXYGEN
78-7800-2100
8.25
MT OXYGEN
01- 4290-2200
19.41
MT OXYGEN
01-42WZM
6/07190 6 /07/90
35.91
J K-CD
1010
DATRiQ: COW
VENDOR TOTAL
33.91
80690
4,4%.00
REBUILD K.LS
01-4280-4200
9, 864.00
REBUILD WILL- WINWER
60-6000-5300
6/07/90 6 /07190
14,360.00
J K-CD
1010
WORKS COUNTRY STOE, INC. VQDQR TOTAL
14360.00
80600
65.72
MT GARBAGE-FIRE
22- 4170-3750
44.52
MAY GARBAGE- STREET
01-4280-3750
103.88
MT GARBAGE -PM
01-4290-3750
6107/90 6/07/90
214.12
J K -GR
1010
B.A000NIAK AND SON
VENDOR TOTAL
214.12
80680
6.00
PTAC K% -ROT
01•140-4120
6/07190 6/07/90
6.00
J K -CD
1010
BRAWORD ROT
VEWUR TOTAL
6.00
80730
273.40
FW
01-4340-2200
6107/90 6/01/90
273.40
J K -CD
1010
PTO ROOT PRMGUCTS
VT: m TOTAL
273.40
O v Yy
80745
250.00
LID TAX REGISTRATION
71-7100 -4140
it
•
)?S2
PAGE 2
PURCHASE JOURNAL
AP -0O2 -01
CITY OF 10110
VENDOR
INVDIM DIE HOLD
NO. INVOICE N40C
DATE DATE STATUS
N WIT
OE5 I TION
6/07/90 6/07/90
250.00
AIL-0
KIREAU OF ALCOL,TUK,F1+ VDOOR TOTAL
250.00
00920
15.24
WATER BILL -LID
6/07/90 6/07190
15.24
J K-M
CITY OF MU10
YEWF TOTAL
15.24
CD940
40.65
MY RUG WIT
31.85
MY AM RENT
6/07/90 6/07/90
72.50
JRIL-CD
C1EAN STEP REIRAL
VEIOOR TOTAL
72.50
01960
38.30
STEEL FLAT,IINC HASP
9.48
PITOER
22.07
MT HK SUPPLIES
85.16
MY NNE SUPPLIES
36.14
MY HDIE SUPPLIES
25.90
MY H01E SUPPLIES
19.97
MY HDIE SUPPLIES
31.71
MY WK SUPPLIES
129.00
WO
2.3B
MILS
10.65
LUW,MILS
94.77
MY 11K SUPPLIES
6/07/90 6/07190
506.53
AIL-0
COAST TO COAST
VDO01 TOTAL
506.53
CD970
526.26
MY MIX
6/07/90 6/07/90
526.26
AIL-M
COCA COLA BOTTLING-RIMIEST YETOO TOTAL
526.26
01010
100.OB
PAGER REPAIR
6/07/90 6107/90
100.08
AIL-CD
LUTWNICATIOI AUDITOR VENOOC TOTAL
100.08
C1f00
21.60
TOER
13.00
MY COPIER MINT
6/07/90 6/07/90
34.60
JRIL -CD
COPY DUPLICATING PRODUCTS YENV TOTAL
34.60
01150
200.00
BLACK DIRT
200.00
BLACK DIRT
6/07/90 6/07/90
400.00
AI-CD
D J EXCAVATING
YEW TOTAL
400.00
D1170
408.65
RR LEASE TO 6/15
204.35
RR LEASE TO 6/15
6/07/90 6/07190
613.00
JRIL -CD
WE 4/c
TIM 13.5
PIE -IMIB OE
AMOUNT KINER mw 0®C 1 oa
1010 •
71- 7100 -3740
1010
01- 4320 -4210
71-7100-4210
1010
OWZ70 -2200
01- 4280-2200
01-4290 -2300
01-4310-2200
73-7300-2200
73- 7300-2300
73-7300-2330
78- 7800-2200
76. 7100.2300
81-4350-2200
10-8000.2200
?24170-2200
1010
71-7100-9510
1010
22- 4170 -3820
1010
73- 7300 -2100
73- 7300-3950
1010
73- 7300-2200
78- 1800.2200
1010
40- 6000 -3910
01-4320 -3910
1010
•
•
I ASS
PALE 3
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE 6/
AP- CO2 -01
CITY OF !WO
TIRE 13.`
VENDOR
INVOICE DUE HOLD
N4E-mll W
NO. INVOICE NO
DATE DATE STATUS
ANOINT
OMIPT1ON
ACCOUNT IIINNER
NOWT LEEK 6 a
• OVA
RAIL INC
YEW TOTAL
613.00
D1200
4,266.05
MAY VEER
71-7100 -9530
6/07/90 6/07/90
4,2~6.05
JAIL -CD
1010
DAY DISTRIBUTING CO
VENDOR TOTAL
4266.05
01238
14.00
LANDFILL FEE
71-1100 -4100
6/07190 6/07/90
14.00
JRNL -CD
1010
DER -Com LANDFILL, INC VENDOR TOTAL
14.00
01320
417.00
RAY CHIEF SALARY
22-4170-1370
6/07/90 6/07/90
417.00
JK-CD
1010
DONNED BRYCE
VENDOR TOTAL
417.00
D1332
146.%
FLUOR IBE
7 3-7300-2260
6/07/90 6/07/90
146.%
JRNL-CD
1010
OPC INDUSTRIES, INC. VENDOR TOTAL
146.96
E1420
7,135.46
MY BEER
71-7100-9530
6/07/90 6/07!90
7,135.46
JRNL-0
1010
EAST SIDE BYERALE
VENDOR TOTAL
7135.46
E1430
98.75
RCM COW EF
01- 4010 -4110
•
17.20
RTG M/ PLOD
01-4040 -4120
6/07/90 6/07/90
115.95
JRNL -CD
1010
EDIM KICLE
VENDOR TOTAL
115.95
F1561
32.00
FIRE CHIEF SUBSCRIPTION
22 -4170-4130
6107/90 6/07/90
32.00
.All -CD
1010
FIRE CHIEF
VENDOR TOTAL
32.00
F1690
79.60
MAT RIC
71- 7100-9540
141.67
RAT RISC
71- 7100-9550
6/07/90 6/07/90
221.27
JR L-CD
1010
FOUFR STAR BAR SUPPLY
VENDOR TOTAL
221.27
F1710
8.25
ELEC MM LUNCH
01- 4060 -4120
6/07190 6/07190
8.25
JRNL-CD
1010
FRAN(W CLARK
VENDOR TOTAL
8.25
G1761
283.30
DO- FOOTINGS -C HALL AWN
30- 6000-5000
6/07/90 6/071%
283.30
,All -CD
1010
GRE CO1 U TWTS INC
VENDOR TOTAL
"'3;1.30
G1900
998,96
REPAIR UNIT 1i
22- 4170 -3820
PKE 4
PURCHASE JOURNAL
GATE 6/1
AP-002-01
CITY OF ROUND
TINE 13.`
vow
INVOICE DIE HOLD
Fff -PAID CNE
NO. INVOICE NTOR
DATE DATE STATUS
AIVUNT
OWIPTIOW
ACCOUNT NUIER
MINT 01EK E OF
92.11
REPLACE PIOGYl1AtX 5
01-4280 -3810
6/07190 6/07/90
1,091.07
JRNL-CD
1010
GARY'S DIM SERVICE
VENOM TOTAL
1091.07
G1820
116.58
J1E RADIO ENICE CONTRACT
01- 4280.3950
56.28
JUNE RADIO EWICE CONTRACT
01- 4340 -39%
12.06
JUNE WIG ENICE CWMACT
01-4190-3950
12.06
JUNE RADIO SERVIM CONTRACT
01- 4290-3950
76.38
JANE RADIO EIVIOL CONTRACT
01- 4140 -3950
12.06
JUNE E RADIO EMM CO TIMC1
01 -4040 -3950
60.30
JIM RADIO EMOL CONIINCT
73 -7300 -3950
28.14
JUNE RADID EIYICE CONTRACT
78-7800-3950
28.14
JUNE RADIO SWCE CO NTIW
22 -4170-3950
279.80
HOPE COLE ENT- AOIO
0'- 4190-3950
6 /07/90 6/07/90
661.80
J1K-CD
1010
GENERAL COIINICATION6
YOM TOTAL
681.80
G1870
258.33
MY MASiEL SKM
22-4170-1370
6 /07/90 6/07/90
258.33
J K-CD
1010
RENTED BAM
Yom TOTAL
258.33
G1890
26.55
MY MAIM CDOLE
01-4140-4100
35.85
MA INTER COGIBi
01- 1090-2200
6.93
MY INTER COOLER
01- 4280-2200
2.83
MY INTER COMB
7 3-7300-2200
2.64
MY INTER COMB
78- 7900-2200
6107/90 6/07190
75.00
JK-CD
1010
•
GLDWOOD INOLDOD
YOM TOTAL.
75.00
/02140
18.00
REPLACE CNLE
22- 4170-3820
6107/90 6/07/90
18.00
J1K-CD
1010
NEW CO SHERIFFS DEPT VEIOOt TOTAL
18.00
H2160
309.11
APR BOARD
01-4110-4250
6107/90 6107/90
309.11
J K
1010
HETN CO TREASM
VET1D[A TOTAL
309.11
12245
7.50
CLEAN KAN►ET
22-4170-22M
6 /07/90 6/07/90
7.50
JRK -CD
1010
NX LAUNDRY, INC
YD9 ON TOTAL
7.50
12400
574.36
REPAIR 842
01-4140-3810
124.62
REPAIR AC -20
22- 4170 -2200
6/07/90 6/07/90
698.98
J K - CD
1010
ISLAi' PAW %aLT
VEW TOTAL
09.98
J2W
42.24
RUST PENETRANT
01- 4290-2250
6/07/90 6 /07/90
41.24
J K -M
1010
•
1 � 60
PAM 3 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 6/C
W-M2 -01 CITY OF PI M TIME 13
VBow INVOICE Of RLD PIE-0AID OE
W. INVOICE M DATE DATE STATUS AMA)IT DESCRIPTION ACLUIIT WIER Alaw DER $ IA
• 11 DISTRINUTING VENDOR TDTAL 42.24
J2520
83.20
LUTE Ma
01-4290 -2300
6/07/90 6/07/90
93.20
JK-C3
1010
Jim mTI7M SALES CD
VEWM TOTAL
83.20
J2536
19.68
MAY MUSE
71- 7100 -9950
6/07/90 6/07190
19.68
JK-Q
1010
J36 DORM SALES
VDNM TOTAL
19.68
K2631
126.93
NUTS,Wfi ER55
01 -4290 -2210
6/07/90 6/07190
126.93
J K-CD
1010
KAR PRDIII[TS
Yew TOTAL
121%.93
L2752
217.
MM GASOLINE
22- 4170.2210
6107190 6107/90
2'7.G,
JBI-0
1010
LABATT'S SPRING PART( " YDWt TOTAL
217.01
L2930
59.83
MAY CAR PARTS
22- 4170-2200
7%.09
NAT CAR PARTS
01- 4290-2310
6107/90 6/07/90
05.92
AIL-0
1010
LONS I 'S AlJYWIVERITCDf
VBWi TOTAL
8%.92
• L2%0
130.54
Ulm
01- 4340 -2310
6/07/90 6/07/90
130.54
JRNL-0
1010
LYMAN U.V0 M
VENOM T07A1
130.54
M3030
6,420.25
MY 3ER
71-7100-9530
6/07/90 6/07/90
6,420.25
JRNL-0
i010
POW VII DISTRIBUTOR VElWt TOTAL
6420.25
MOW
170.00
JOLT EIFORS MINT
0!-4095 -3900
6/07/90 6/07190
170.00
JK-M
1010
MASTS CORPORATION
YDUF TOTAL
170.00
M3170
31,836.39
Jl1E SDER SERVICE
78-7800 -4230
9,476.51-
J11E 900 SERVICE
78-1190-0000
477.48-
JUNE %W SERVICE
78- 3812-0000
6!07/90 6107190
21,902.40
Ji111 -CD
1010
WTR0 WASTE CONTRII
COW# VENDOR TUTAI
21902.40
1040
29.98
JUAE PAGER 6EPU
01-4140-3950
6107/90 6/07/90
29.98
JK-CD
1010
"IM COIN
VEM(R TTT'AL
2 9 .9e
.7
/ 7,G/
PACE 6
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE 6/f
AP-002 -01
CITY OF WIC
TIRE I
YOM INVOICE ME HOLD
PE4MIA OF
NO. INIAICE IM DATE DATE STATUS
AIWtT
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NIGER
am ow DA
M9
20.00
LEW ASSES90fT FEE
80- 8000-4100
6/07/90 6107190
10.00
JK-m
1010
•
NN AS91 OF CE)FTERY OFFIC+ YDW TOTAL
20.00
N3271
3.40
CELL" TELE
22- 4170 -3220
22.%
OR.L lfR TELE
01-4140-3220
39.02
CELLULAR TELE
73-7300-3220
6/07/90 6/07/90
67.38
JK-G
1010
0 CFLIJ AR TEI WNE CO YDW TOTAL
67.38
I1289
9,357.25
MGON DIfO1 COATS
22-4170-2200
6/07/90 6/07/90
9,357.23
JK-CI)
1010
NN CONWAY FIRE i SAFETY VENDDR TOTAL
9 357.25
K3470
100.00
LAD ANALYSIS
73- 7300 -3100
6/07/90 6/07/90
100.00
JK-m
1010
E VALLEY TESTING LABOMTO VENDOR TOTAL
100.00
111471
18.50
90,91 DIES-W W6WATE R
78 -7800 -4130
6/07/90 6/07/90
18.50
JNL-m
1010
NN NASTEIIATER OPERAMRS AS VENMR TOTAL
18.50
mm"
5,779.25
AMT SALARIC6
22 -4170 -1390
1,167.00
ANY (MINT
22-4170-3190
695.50
AMT DRILLS
22- 4170 -1380
•
6/07/90 6/07190
7,601.75
JK-M
1010
MIND FIRE DF WMIE Nf VDOCUt TOTAL
7601.75
111500
5,399.00
JUNE FIRE RELIEF PENSION
95- 9500-1400
6/07/90 6/07,f90
5,399.00
JK-m
1010
OW FIRE RELIEF ASSN YEN MR TOTAL
5359.00
83600
1,030.50
'90 MM-RETAINER-FINAL
8:- 4350-5300
6107/90 6/07/90
1,030.50
JK-0
1010
IMA PORTAL 11E VENDOR TOTAL
!030.50
N3681
4.33
LOGIC MINT
01-4.W3BOC
6/07/90 6107/90
4.33
JK - CIA
1010
NATL aWUIER STSTEM VDOM TOTAL
4.33
wGu,oA
245.OU
NAPA SU(Q 1 EG15TRATION
01
6107M 6/07/90
145.00
JCL M
1010
NATI RE- ATION t PARU AM VEW Mk
245.00
Km
5,047.64
NOT STREET LiOTTS
01- 4280 -3710
6/07/90 6/07
5,04
,lilt - CIF
1010
)��z
PAM 7 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 6/(
AP -M -01 CITY OF IM/0 TILE 13.`
YENIM INVOICE DUE HOLS PRE-KID CIE
NO. IMICE NO DATE DATE STATUS NQW. 3ES RIPTI01 ACCO I T mm Plum OEM t DR
is NMT40 STATES POO YEW TOTAL 5011.54
1 �G3.
P3994
202.60
NAT MINE
71 -9520
6/07190 6/07190
202.(J
JK-t'D
1010
PAU5TIS It 506
VENOTR TOTAL
202.60
P4000
321.03
Mr MII
71 - 9510
6/07/90 6/071%
321.03
JK
iCtO
PEPSI -QIlA ammy
A]= MTAL
321.00
P4040
117.00
POSH METER FW 6-9
01- 4320 -3210
6/07/90 6107/90
117.00
JRII-CI)
1010
PITET BOWES INC
YOM TOTAL
117.00
P4049
30.00
5-6 -7 PEST CONTROL
71- 7100 -42M
6/07/90 6107/90
30.00
JK-CD
1010
PUJIK T'S, INC
YENIM TOTAL
30.00
P4060
2,789.60
MT BEER
71 7100-95M
6/07/90 6107/90
2,789.60
JK-CD
1010
FQiIEBA DISTRIBUTING CO YOM TOTAL
2789.60
P4110
416.17
STRIPE LOTS
40-6000-4200
•
2,072.93
STRIPE 0lDS91A116
01- 4280-2360
6/07/90 6/07/90
2,439.10
J NL-0
1010
PRECISION STRIPING
YETNDOR TOTAL
2439.10
R4206
36.95
METER
01- 4Wr2200
6/07/90 6/07190
36.95
JK-0
1010
RADIO SWtt)c
'Aw TOTAL
36.95
R420o
104.67
MT GARBAGE
01- 4320-3750
6/071K 6/071%
104.67
J NL-CD
1010
RANDY 5 SANITATION
VENOW TOTAL
104.67
R4230
13.12
STRAP CLIPS
22 -4170 -2100
7.36
STRAP CLIPS
01-4040 -4100
0/07/90 6/01190
20.50
JK -CD
1010
RC !DEN'1F!ZATIX
'A VW -0 AL
20.50
R4;$'
200.00
MAY ASST CHIEF SALARY
22 -4170 -1370
6!01190 6!07'90
200.00
JK-CD
1010
RIND MARSM
VEIDOR TOTAL
200.00
R4 9C
3(14.87
NWT ICE
71- 7100 -9540
•
1 �G3.
PAM 0
PURCHASE JOURNAL
ah 6/(
4P-02 -01
CITY OF IQRO
TIME 13.`.
vow
IMICE DUE HOLD
PRE-NO C E
NO. INVOICE MAR
DATE DATE STATUS
ARM
DESCRIPTION
ACCENT sm
aw OEOC O DA
6/07/90 6/07/90
;09.87
JlK-CD
1010
ION'S ICE WANT
YEW TOTAL
309.87
S4381
57,297.34
PINT 12-C WILL ADDTN
3D- 60005D00
6/07/90 6/07190
57,297.34
JK-CD
1010
9HINm lURDERS
VEXW TOTAL
57297.34
S4419
26.00
SODET
01 4340
007/90 6/07/90
26.00
JR
1010
9w IT; s
VDMOR TOTAL
26.00
sum
86.00
IMPOIIM SHEETS
01-41403500
26.90
IWINE95 CARDS
01- 4060 -3100
6/07/90 6/07/90
112.90
J11-3
1010
SOS PRINTM
YEW TOTAL
112.90
S40O
3.50
MT CAR WASHES
01- 4010-3110
7.00
MT CAR WASHES
01- 42803110
136.50
MT CAR ICES
01-41403110
6/07190 6/07/90
147.00
JI1L-CIl
IMO
SPRING PANG CAR N119U YEW TOTAL
147.00
54642
041.47
SERVICE WELL 6
73- 73004200
6/07/90 6/07/90
811.47
JK-CD
1010
•
SYSTEMS SERVICE COMPANY VDMOR TOTAL
841.47
T4730
45.00
NEMSLETTEA LABELS
0I- 10204111
49.25
49? NTD 40
01 41"-4100
39.00
PIK HEARINGS
01
88.40
FILIAL STMT-L10
71- 71003510
200.00
FINANCIAL STMT
01- 40903510
65.10
FIN KIAL STMT -VTR
73-73003510
63.10
FINANCIAL STMT -SW
78- 78003510
6107/90 6107190
451.85
JK -CD
1010
THE LAIETI
VDMOR TOTAL
761.85
T4770
10,395.20
MAY BEER
71- 71009530
6/07/90 6/07/90
10,395.20
JRW-CD
1010
THO PE DISTRIBUTING
CO %VW TOTAL
10395.20
T4790
5.98
BATERIES
01-4020 -ZNC
5.99
EATERIES
01-43402200
39.98
FIL11
01-41902200
22.46
FILM
22- 41702100
6/07 MO 6107/90
74.41
JK-ED
1010
THRIFTY 9RDER DRUG
N04 AXOR TUTAL
74.41
•
1�0
/ 7k5-
PAGE o
PURCHASE JOURNAL -
DATE 6/G
AP-0O2 -01
CITY OF MW
TIME 13.`•
VN:74NTtt IWAICE ME H D
PREPAID 0E`
M0. INVOICE Nit DATE DATE STATUS
NdlUNT
DWIPTION
AMOUNT aim
mw ow N DA
T4810
704.57
TINUIRS
01- 4320-2200
6/07/90 6/07/90
704.57
AL-CD
1010
TINUYMgLL LVWJPING YBW TOTAL
704.57
Wm
439.95
UN1FWFMEIANISSETN
01-4140-2210
6/07/90 6/07/90
439.95
AL-0
1010
UIIFINM6 U11LINITED VBOOR TOTAL
439.95
115190
33.21
NOT TDIELS
01- OW2250
94.73
MY ALM
78 -7800 -2200
''73.36
MY UNIFONG
01- 4280-2240
54.68
MY UNIFOW
01- 4290 -2240
139.73
MAY U NIFING
73- 7300-2240
139.73
Of UNIFING
78- 7800-2240
17.76
ROT NO
22 ii7ti2200
6 /07/90 6/07/90
773.22
AIL-
1010
UN I TM FBITAL STSI VEImN TOTAL
774.22
V3190
609.00
APR COPTE}N PLAN UPDATE
16 -%" -3100
2,242.Y
APR PLAN CO6lLT
01-4190-3100
6/07/90 6 /07/70
2,851.30
JRNL-CD
1010
VANDORDI�NiARD-S ALLIM YEW TOTAL
21151.50
U5430
1,449.58
WD ERT,CALIPER TM
73
•
6/07/90 61'07/90
1,449.51
AL-0
1010
MATER PImCTS CO MI VE1mt TOTAL
1449.58
1529
243.22
NOT Of i TELE-4f1M
16-M -4100
6/07/90 6 /07/90
243.22
JK-M
1010
NESTWA COR!mNITT ACTH 0 Vow TOTAL
243.22
M5560
170.66
MY GAR A E
01 4340 - 3750
6 /07/90 6/07/90
170.66
AIL-CD
1010
MFSTI3WA SANITATION VElmt TOTAL
170.66
N1563o
856.00
BARTIE"
73 -7310 -3800
420.00
STANDPIPE 5/15
73- 73003800
840.00
2 WORMS iEPL 5P
73- 73003800
315.00
BITE VALVE 5/9
73-73003800
6/01/90 6 /07190
2,433.00
JRML
1010
Aim INC VENDOR TOTAL
2433.00
0690
1,056.76
BLAOCTOP
73-73002340
26.75
SNO
01-42802340
6107190 6 /07/90
1,081.51
AL -CD
1010
W TELLER 4 SDc VEMOOR TOTAL
1087.51
/ 7k5-
PAGE 10
PURCHASE JOURNAL
DATE 6/(
AP- CO2-01
CITY OF KUND
TINE 13. 5
VQw
INVOICE ME HOLD
PRE -MID 0E'
NO. INVOICE NO DATE DATE STATUS NMUNT
DESCRIPTION
AGAIIT VIER
AMOUNT OW I DA
an
1,350.00
.41E RETAINER
01- 4110 -3100
6/07/90 6/07/90
1,350.00
JK-CD
1010
IM- FEARSON-LARSON VENOOR TOTAL
1350.00
Y5750
53.26
PRINC -1012
01-4310 -5000
3.51
INT -1012
01-4320-6110
304.00
DRY INK
01- 4320.2200
6/07/90 6/07/90
360.77
JK-0
1010
MW CORPORATION
VENDOR TOTAL
360.77
16070
100.00
NAT AM NAR511LL
22- 4170 -1370
6/07/90 6/07/90
100.00
JK-M
1010
NI0IAEL PALM
VENDOR TOTAL
100.00
16122
123.33
EtS 'PLIES -E OELW8tT
22- 4170 -3630
6/07/90 6/07/90
123.33
JK-CD
1010
MOT ENGELHARf
VENDOR TOTAL
123.33
TOTAL All VENDORS
181,558.13
•
0oSy
•
1�(O 0
:7
CITY � �f 110' ND ;3Nc M N N O ESO A 5 °64 E'2 4'2 -1
June 6, 1990
TO: Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Joyce Nelson
Recycling Coordinator
SUBJECT: May's Recycling
Hennepin County stated that in January of 1991 we will be
expected to pickup plastic. They will be requiring us to
pickup milk jugs and pop bottles. Hennepin County will be
starting an appliance recycling. They will be certifing
processing facilities in the metropolitan area to receive
white goods containing CFCs or PCB. When the transfer
stations are up and running they will also accept the white
goods for a f
Minnetrista stated that if they receive as many loads of
leaves this Fall as they did this Spring they will have to
close down the compost site. Hennepin County has not shedded
the leaves from last Fall. They say they don't have the
man power any more.
Recycling barrels have been placed in 3 of the parks for can.
Thera are 2 at Mound Bay Park, 1 at Philbrook and 1 at Swenson.
Tonnage for May wns 54, "1
•
1 767
June 5, 1990
i� ` 1 l �� l� ��' �
5341
MG ND MINNESOTA �
OTA 55364
612) 472 -1155
TO: Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Ceno Hoff
Street Sup-,.
SUBJECT: May's Activity Report
We finished the Spring clean –up the 10th. Everything in town
has been swept at least on( e. The downtown area and some of our •
h e a
aviest travled streets, such s Wilshire, Bartlett, Comerce,
Shoreline, Lynwood, etc. have been swept 2 to 4 times. We
ended up with '48 loads of dibris, approximately 1,200 yards.
After we finished our Spring clean –up we went to work on the
repair of the streets that were due ur) because of water and
sewer main breaks, we have 1R to repair.
We had Bjork Country Stone back in town repair and replacing
retaining walls. The replaced 7 small walls at the cost of
$4,496.00. We have 2 hig repl,rcement !ohs, one on Hanover
which cost $9,864.00 which has peen completed and another at
Lynwood and Apple that they havrnIt st;3rted. The cost $8,460.00
;rnd that not the comp Ifty jot, it will take about $4,000 more
try finish. Th ese retaining wal hive ho-en one big expensive
prr.hlem.
We'vr horn spe71 111 11 t irn the I,—,r Lake Site trying to
le,rn t.rp snmr r thr mess II — w;r, curator! over the winter
moat hs. Wt. �:c hut11t Io :1d o hl.rc ktnp ,rnd cement chunks
to M;rVer f�), repv(Iiil The fiff dirt from the watermain
hr� ,rkti, 'm having ,r 1 i t t le rnuhl� f indink a spot to h iuI it
t ! M1. 11'RY W('1.h'
!..rued nut f gr.rae.1 ,rnri n 1 d 5 graves s t es. We made
a l o o f t r i p s t o t h r ,�!11" t T wr f r e Me mo r i a l I)a y
b rat i nf; gt ,lve" r.rt e t horn.
1 �0
SIGN WORK
is We made some new signs and brackets for the street light pole
on Commerce Blvd., also put up "Around Mound Run" bar;n, for
Mound City Days. Replaced 2 stop, 4 No Parkin};, I Slow Children
and 2 No Dumping.
•
•
041
THIS LAST THIS YEAR LAST YEAR
MONTH OF MAY 1990 MONTH MONTH TO DATE TO DATE
Mo
NO. OF CALLS
40
42
184
145
MOUND - FIRE
EMERGENCY
6
5
29
31
21
21
83
5t
M'TONKA BEACH - FIRE
EMERGENCY
0
3
5
3
0
1
1
1
MINNETRISTA - FIRE
EMERGENCY
1
4
11
8
3
1
8
4
ORONO - FIRE
EMERGENCY
5 1 0
16
22
0
0
6
1
SHOREWOOD - FIRE
EMERGENCY
p
SPRING PARK - FIRE
EMERGENCY
1
4
12
8
2
3
1
11
MUTUAL AID - FIRE
EMERGENCY
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL FIRE CALLS
14
16
74
72
TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS
26
26
110
73
COMMERICAL
1
0
4
8
RESIDENTIAL
4
6
33
32
INDUSTRIAL
0
1
2
2
GRASS & MISCELLANEOUS
4
4
19
17
AUTO
3
1
7
9
FALSE ALARM
4
NO. OF HOUR'S - MOUND FIRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
- MTKA BCH FIRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
- M'TRISTA FI
EMERGENCY
T OTAL
129
193
774
58
460
424
1601
969
589
617
2375
1558
0
89
129
66
0
14
14
11
0
103
143
77
28
125
263
293
76
10
207
64
104
135
470
357
- OF'.ONO FIRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
137
0
543
618
0
0
131
- ;)
137
0
674
634
- SHOREW050 'IRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-SP. PARK F IRE
EMERG _
TOTAL
19
79
346
156
46
52
264
J 610
169
65
131
325
- MUTUAL AID FIR
EMERGEN
TOTA
TOTAL DRILL HOURS
TOTAL F 'ERGEIICY HOOP=
6 4
0
64
0
0
0
0
0
64
0
64
0
172
1723
8 55
1 .2 17
760
5H2
;229
MMM PIRt MPARTMENT FOR MONTH OF MAY 1990
•
•
i s
SIRE FICtITERS
DRILIS i JaINTENANCL
FIRE & RESCUE
RILLB
DRILL
PACES
MAIN.
MACES
TOTAL HOURI T
HOURS RATE WAGES
J. ANDERSEN
x
x
00
0
35 6.00 210.00
C. AND RelnN
X
X
2
19.00
1'
24 6.00 144.00
MAR
X
2
19.00
0
36 216.00
D. BOYD
X
X
2
19.00
2
21 6 126.00
X
2
19.00
0
37 6.50 240.
S. BRYCE
X
x
2
19.00
7 -
28 6.00 168.00
D. CARISON
X
X
2
19.00
1
32 6.00 192.00
J. CASEY
X
X
2
19.00
2
30 6.00 180.00
X
2
19.00
1
27 6.00 162.00
M. DAVID
X
X
2
19.00
3
29 6.00 174.00
R. EICELHART
X
X
2
19.00
18
26 256.00
2
19.00
0
23 6.00 138.00
P. Fis
X
X
2
19.00
2
32 6.00 192.00
J. GARVAIS
X
X
2
19.00
1%,
24 6.00 144.00
_
K. GRADY
�.
M 6.00 108.
C. KWDE
X
X
2
19.00
4
28 168.00
P. HENRY
X
X
2
19.00
6
31 6.00 186.00
G. OHNSON
0
0
0
-0-
0
0 6.00 �'-
2
19.00
6
31 6.00 186•
R. MARSCHKE
X
X
2
19.00
0
27 6.25
168.75
X
X
2
L9.00
2
17 6.00
102.00
M. NELSON
X
X
2
19.00
0
20 6.00
120.00
B. NICCUM
X
X
2
19.00
0
26 6.00
156.00
A. OPI17
X
X
2
19.00
2
24 6.00
1" 00
G. PALM
X
X
2
19.00
3
30 6.00
180.00
M PALM
6.00
T. PALM
X
X
2
19.00
1
33 6.00
198.00
6.00
T. RASPIJSSEN
x
x
2
19.00
0
16 6.00
96.00
M. SA
X
X
2
19.00
9
34 6.00
204.00
K. SIPPRFLI,
X
X
2
19.00
3
29 6.00
174.00
R . STAIJMAN
X
X
2
19.00
16
16 6.00
96.00
T. SWENSON
X
X
2
19.00
6
24 6.00
144.00
[� F
X
1
9.50
1
34 6.00
204.00
_ R. WILLI
T LIILLT
x
X
2
19. (X)
15=2
33 6.0
198.00
x
x
2
)
2
26
156.00
34
35
69
655.50
123 HRS
959 KM
5779.25
2 HRS
DR 111,
t55.50
MAINT
116
TCytAL
7601.75
Date: S - a
D R I L L R E P O R T
Tin
Tim
Discipline and Team work a
Pumper Operation
Fire Streams i Friction
Critique of Fires
Loss
Pre - Plaining and Inspections
House Burnings
Tools i Apparatus
Natural i Propane Gas
talk i Demonstrations
Identifying
Hand Extinguisher Operation
Ladder Evolutions
Wearing Protective Clothing
Salvage Operations
Films
Radio Operations
First Aid and Rescue
House Evolutions
Nozzle i Hose Alliance
Operation
Use of Self- Contained Masks
Inhalator Operation
Note: Howse Training Paid
® Excused X Unexcused Q Present, Not paid
Miscellaneous:
•
J. Andersen
: 31T G Anderson v6 - S
J. . Babb P.
D. Boyd Z J.
�� D. Bryce P.
7� S . Bryce —'/
D. Carlson
i t� C•
J. Casey G.
if. S. Collins B.
M . David R.
R. Engelhrrt 1 J.
7j B.
Erickson 7 7 A
Fisk G.
Garvais M.
Grady T
Henry G
Henderson T•
Johnson M•
Landsman K .
Marschke T i��_ R.
Nafus T.
Niccum W•
7R l- R.
Nelson
Opitz
Palm
Palm
Palm
Pederson
Rasmussen
Savage
sipprell
Stal lman
Swenson
Swenson
Williams
w; I l�A tinS
DrTIlmaster
D?Z
!. 1,1• �• F 0 �' • ;44.
•1 / 1 •
•
•
Date:
D R I L L
Discipline and Team work
Critique of Fires
Pre- Plaining and Inspections
Tools i Apparatus
Identifying
Hand Extinguisher operation
Wearing Protective Clothing
Films
First Aid and Rescue
operation
Use of Self- Contained Masks
Tics
R E P O R T
Pumper operation
Fire Streams i Friction
Loss
House Burnings
Natural & Propane Gas
talk i Demonstrations
Ladder evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzle i Hose Alliance
Inhalator Operation
Note: House Training Paid
Excused X Unexcused Q Present, Not paid
Tile
l
Miscellaneous: S Q „c e- �- c f. r o cl & f.. TPA : ^*9 J C -'1 a-'1 - 0
j. Andersen
Via-- G. Anderson
,i J. Babb
�. D. Boyd
Vii D. Bryce
v1 S. Bryce
D. Carlson
J. Casey
S. Collins
M. David
3 -- R. Engelhart
S.
P.
J.
�}. K .
P.
C.
G.
B.
R.
J.
��-
B.
Erickson
Fisk
Garvais
Grady
Henry
Henderson
Johnson
Landsman
Marschke
Naf us
Niccum
a'/1 M. Nelson
A. Opitz
1 G. Palm
�- M. Palm
T. Palm
4_ G. Pederson
T. Rasmussen
�I/ M. Savage
/- K. Sipprell
`4 R. Stallman
�. T. Swenson
W. Swenson
r - R. Williams
a T S
r 1 asater
1? 73
DATE y a_ 3 /, /490
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
wrAL MI NTENANCE FOR MON M OF 7'11 90
i�1 � lb
O
J. ANDE RSE2I
�
G. ANDERSON
O
J.
BABB
,Z
D.
BOYD
G
D.
BRYCE
it yz
S.
BRYCE
D.
CARLSON
02
J.
CASEY
o
S.
COLLINS
M.
DAVID
R.
ENGELHART
D
S.
ERICKSON
,2
P.
FISK
3
K.
SIPPRELL
Aa
.T.
GARVAIS
o� ,2
K.
GRADY
C.
HENDERSON
�O
P.
im- mY
D
G.
JOHNSON
�O
B.
TANDSZ lAN
R.
MARSOM
OTAL MON TNLY HOURS
•
•
M4
J.
NF.FUS
0
M.
h-ELSON
L
B.
NICCUM
it yz
A.
OPITZ
3
G.
PALM
o
M.
PALM
T.
PAI l
G.
PEDERSON
O
T.
RASMUSSEN
1t.
SAVAGE
3
K.
SIPPRELL
Aa
R.
STALLMAN
6
T.
SIOZON
W.
SWENsoN
R.
WILLIAMS
Of
T.
WELLIAPLS
•
•
M4
June 7, 1990
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: CITY CLERK
RE: MAY MONTHLY REPORT
There were 2 regular Council Meetings, and 2 Board of Review
Meetings in May. I want to take this opportunity to thank Linda
for handling the 22nd Council Meeting. From these meetings there
were minutes, resolutions and ordinances to be completed.
I got the budget pages inputted into the computor for all
departments with all the figures from previous years.
Linda and I attended an election meetino with other Hennepin
County Clerks to review the legislation passed in the past
session.
I attended the annual IIMC (International Institute of Municipal
Clerks) Conference from May 20 to 25. The theme this year was
"Learning, Changing, Shaping ", which was reflected in the variety
of topics covered in the educational sessions, presentations and
the exhibits. I feel this conference helps me to acquire
knowledge that can be used in Mound to better serve the residents
and my profession. There were over 40 different wcrkshops on a
variety of topics. IIMC now has over 9,700 memhers from, all uVer
the world.
At the IIMC Conference I was elected to the Board of Directors
representing Region VI (Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin). There
are 11 regions in this organization with 2 directors from each
region. This is a three year term and should be very
interesting. I have also been appointed co- chair to the IIMC
Election /Legislation Committee which will monitor Federal
election legislation.
I am continuing to microfilm t,.e packets for this year so that we
do not have the volume of paper to store.
i f
1
?7S
ALL
F F Y f N 101 "N I
I u 11 r ! L4 ( 4 cl,
r O Eii Shu k I "
C I r v m A TI. A g C I
F p 0 M (; r t �, Br. g q
M t l ha n
S 1 R ,! F. CT : Ma A ( T i V I t v Rc j r t
•
PA k K ') 1 - F PT
I q O
I o [I h<
v Dump
! v
I
-4
P i k
I
i 1 ; T A (I i I
nn h,
v
r c p,i r t
w i r i n g p
TI
- n
r
I
•
•
•
CI T up N
BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT
saws -'AY Iry 19%
A{Sp 11
SraIUCTIONtraMa
��.
wrr
u..
'""""
•w. r Or
.,,..
ar..•.
a.�.a+•
2
226 485
5
488,485
a aarw
• wr.aww
TOW FawrJUAw
2
2
226,85
5
488,485
NEw NEe� DENT�K
IWwo � T
, Nrr
1 aawr
i ew,.Or.w
TOW NowfaaAW
,
NEW NOl+aeatOEWT AI
ICo
� arrw.w
••MAr
•wrM iwww
N•ti�.r
J a ry.ww
s rr„wi,•, awr•
a A„r fr.,r .ti
A.Ar
a ..•••.M M
�„4•W
a Iw•,V��a
.� arWwOw
ToW Now leas o mol
M
ES�DENTAL ADO,TpwS
AND KTERATiONS
•,..�
•rte S..w..,..
••Nnr
•w
A. wrr
rw�
5
36.755
10
136,
d•+-
5
32,200
it
a -~at— decks
8
19,920
15
35,060 1
0
IL o..• remodel
11
58,1
TOW a mei
30
152,045
78
396,175
NNppw RESIDENTU, ADD.
nONSEAaTERAT
N..r.,
A«r a.r<•...
•a.,w�
•�,,.,,,,,
N•I ,,, N
' °'"'r' W."
1
4,000
9
:14,4
40— Church! PUhli
1
.
Tole, Now
2
24,000
13
787,749
T TAB
• AA TO O�r� ANO
34
402,530
w
5
1,672,409
..... 9
1 CANVE RS10NS
A�.,, ,i+w
w.^r.M i.,
♦ � ••MGM
•w
�• Ow
•wn•.
� •a.• r Crw +..n.
DEMOL,T-ONS r �.y
w ^Te'. , ". V••
.w••D—
••'•r• UwY a•.n.••
, A ••awo I i
T ote DaTouiaea
DERM 'S '•Sof :.'Jai +• •.�. .
, rr .•
�O..E: jai •..rs.. .�.,: •D..
•v.w_ – T
rla
..�..ND•r
y `
fences wa s v 0
r �� ....� .. - - - 4 — 9 - — -�- - --
--
--
(includes City
Hall addition)
197?
AL
i 11 " \ l , \ A `1 0\\ I J _ " MOUND. M NNE A 5534>4
(612! 472-5
June 5, 1
TO Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM (.reg Skinnc - r
Water & Sewer Supt
S1'BJECT: Mav's Activity Rearm
In Mav we pumped 24, 241,000 gallons of water. There were 9
turn -offs for non - payment. We are still waiting for the motor •
for pumphouse 'dl to come back, hopefully it will be back in
service by the middle of Tune. We started to repaint pumphouse
k7 this month. We also will be landscaping, along with a little
hl.a(ktop repair. Well x3 will receive a new sidewalk and blacktop
drivew.ly. W e I re just ;about caught up with the repair work from
the w,atermain breaks this winter. We dug up and repaired 21
w.atcr shut offs this rnonth. Restoration should he completed by
rn i (1 .luny .
tif.WER !)FAIT.
The Sewer Dept . t inished wet wall mrain!enance in!1 has started
with !.ewer line m.aintcn,anrc.
•
!��t
0 / AL
•
JUNE 5, 1990
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR `
RE: MAY FINANCE REPORT
INVESTMENTS
Balance May 1, 1990
Bought:
BA 8.20 American
FNMA 8.38 Dain
Matured:
CP
8.13
Dain
CD
8.00
American
CP
8.03
Shearson
CP
8.15
American
Due 9 -13 -90
Due 5 -28 -91
5:4'• MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MINNESOTA 55364
.6'2i 472-n55
17,478,573
187,391
300,000
(244,534)
(100,000)
(200,000)
(154,034)
$7,267,396
GENERAL FUND RESERVES
The General Fund balance at January 1 was $636,315. The majority
of the city's revenues are derived from taxes (property and spe-
cial assessments) and state payments (LGA and homestead credit
now called HACA). We receive the first tax payment from the
County the end of June and the first state payment in July.
Therefore, the expenditures far exceed the revenues for the
General Fund the first five months. The cash balance in the
General Fund at the end oi' May is - = 150,000. Yet the governor
and some legislators feel that cities in general have excess fund
reserves and would like to reduce state payments to those cities
they deem to have excess reserves.
JN:ls
1
/771
nCL ICF \
'i
TO: Ed Shukle
FROM: Len Harrell
SUBJECT: Monthly Report
I. STATISTICS
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road Telephone. 472 -3711 •
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 5449511
EMERGENCY 911
for May, 1990
The police department responded to 927 calls for serv-
ice during the month of May. There were 20 Part I•
offenses reported. Those offenses included 1 criminal
sexual conduct, 1 aggravated assault, 2 burglaries, 15
larcenies, and 1 vehicle theft.
There were 72 Part II offenses reported. Those of-
fenses included 8 child abuse /neglect, 2 forgery /NSF
checks, 9 criminal damage to property, 3 weapons viola-
tions, 3 narcotics violations, 7 liquor law violations,
8 DWI's, 7 simple assaults, 4 domestics, 5 harassment,
7 juvenile status offenses, 2 trespassing, and 12 other
violations.
The patrol division issued 146 adult citations and 13
juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for
an additional 25 citations. Warnings were issued to 61
individuals for a variety of violations.
There were 9 adult felony arrests and 12 juvenile
felony arrests. Nineteen adults and 8 juveniles were
arrested fQr misdemeanors. There were 20 warrant ar-
rests.
The department assisted in 11 vehicular accidents, one
with injuries. There were 43 medical emergencies and
116 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies
on 5 occasions in May and requested assistance 11
times.
Property valued at $6,346 was stolen and $1,035 was
recovered in May.
1 •
1180
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - MAY, 1990
X4
The investigators worked on 9 child protection cases
and 3 criminal sexual conduct cases in May. These 12
cases accounted for more than .0 hours of investigative
time. There have been 30 child protection cases
reported to date. In addition, cases involving
burglary, arson, narcotics, assault, theft, deprivation
of parental rights, fraud, NSF checks, damage to
property and harassing communications were inves-
tigated. One assault involved the use of a broken
plat6 by a young woman to severely lacerate the arm of
her live -in boyfriend.
Formal complaints were issued in 8 cases; includ:tg
concealing a child from a parent, several assaults,
harassing communications, and gross misdemeanor DWI's.
III. Personnel /Staffing
The department used approximately 95 hours of over -time
during the month of May. Over time is up due to an in-
jury to Officer Bostrom in which he broke his wrist and
is unable to work. Officers used 23 hours of comp -
time, 113 hours of sick time, 10 hours of holiday
time, and 40 days of vacation. Officers earned 57 hours
of comp -time in May.
Officers received 34 days of training during the month.
The training courses included defensive tactics for
edged weapons, canine training, Emergency Medical Tech-
nician re- certification, achieving excellence in law
enforcement, fitness instructor certification, and in-
toxilyzer re- certification.
IV. Police Reserves
The police reserves donated 163 hours of time during
the month of Miy. They assisted in Safety Days, emer-
gency call outs, CPR classes, and the Memorial Day
parade. Several attended a class on gangs and nar-
cotics.
•
2
I ?gl
El
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT
MAY, 1990
1
•
•
•
Mz
THIS
YEAR TO
LAST YEAR
GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY
MONTH
DATE
TO DATE
Hazardous Citations
93
404
391
Non- Hazardous Citations
51
129
98
Hazardous Warnings
8
53
41
Non- Hazardous Warnings
43
190
149
Verbal Warnings
79
612
549
Parking Citations
25
159
259
DWI
8
38
24
Over .10
7
30
14
Property Damage Accidents
10
26
51
Personal Injury Accidents
1
11
it
Fatal Accidents
0
0
0
Adult Felony Arrests
11
30
17
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests
35
172
113
Adult Misdemeanor Citations
13
46
27
Juvenile Felony Arrests
12
32
13
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests
10
25
12
Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 3
it
6
Part I Offenses
20
122
94
Part II Offenses
72
335
235
Medicals
43
126
117
Animmal Complaints
116
363
404
Other Public Contacts
654
2,401
2,608
TOTAL
1,314
5,315
5,233
Assists
26
142
225
Follow -Ups
30
107
139
Henn. County Child Protection
4
18
20
Mutual Aid Given
5
62
83
Mutual Aid Requested
11
36
42
1
•
•
•
Mz
MAY, 1990
OFFENSES
CLEARED
EXCEPT.
CLEARED By
ARRESTED
REPORTED
UNFOUNDED
CLEARED
ARREST
ADULT
JUVENILE
PART 1 CRIMES
Naafi c i de
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Sexual Conduct
1
0
0
0
1
0
Robbery
0
0
0
0
0
0
Aggravated Assault
1
0
0
1
1
0
Burglary
2
1
0
1
0
4
Larceny
15
0
0
2
6
6
Vehicle Theft
1
0
0
1
1
2
Arson
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
20
1
0
S
9
12
PART it CRIMES
Child Abuse /Neglect
8
4
2
0
0
0
Forgery /NSF Checks
2
0
1
0
0
0
Criminal Oamege to Property
9
0
0
2
1
3
Weapons
3
0
1
2
2
0
Narcotics
3
0
0
3
3
0
Liquor Laws
2
0
0
2
2
1
DWI
8
0
0
8
8
0
Simple Assault
7
0
3
1
i
0
Domestic Assault
0
0
0
0
0
0
Domestic (No Assault)
4
0
0
0
0
0
Harassment
S
0
1
0
1
0
Juvenile Status Offenses
7
0
5
1
0
1
Public Peace
1
0
1
0
0
0
Trespassing
2
0
0
2
0
3
All Other Offenses
11
0
0
1
1
0
TOTAL
8
72
4
14
22
19
PART 111 i PART IV
Property Damage Accidents
10
Personal injury Accidents
1
Fatal Accidents
0
Medicals
43
Animal Complaints
116
Mutual A`d
S
Other General Investigations
654
TOTAL
829
Hennepin County Child Protection
4
CHIPS
2
•
TOTAL
927
5
14
27
28
20
1
1783
MONTHLY PROPERTY LOSS /RECOVERY SUMMARY
MAY, 1990
STOLEN RECOVERED
Bikes
$ 216
$ 176
Snowmobiles
0
0
Boats, Motors, Trailers
1,200
200
Clothing
0
24
Currency, Notes, Etc.
0
0
Jewelry & Precious Metals
75
0
Guns
40
0
Home Furnishings
0
0
Radio & Electronic Equipment
525
0
Vehicles & Vehicle Equipment
600
600
Miscellaneous
3,690
35
TOTAL
$ 6,346
$ 1,035
1 1*
logy
•
•
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
MAY, 1990
CITATIONS
DWI
More than .10% BAC
Careless /Reckless Driving
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
Open Bottle
Speeding
No DL or Expired DL
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired, or No Plates
Illegal Passing
Stop Sign Violations
Failure to Yield
Equipment Violations
H &R Leaving the Scene
No Insurance
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
Over the Centerline
Parking Violations
Crosswalk
Dog ordinances
Derelict Autos
Seat Belt
ADULT
8
6
0
10
0
65
2
1
16
0
5
1
2
0
1
0
0
25
3
0
0
20
MV /ATE? 0
Miscellaneous Tags -§
TOTAL 171
J UV
0
0
0
0
0
7
2
0
0
K
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
$
0
0
1
13
17��
POUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
MAY, 1990
WARNINGS
ADULT
JUV
No Insurance
17
1
Traff
5
0
Equipment
21
6
Crosswalk
0
0
Animals
3
0
Trash /Derelict Autos
7
0
Seat Bait
0
0
Trespassing
0
0
Miscellaneous
1
0
TOTAL
54
7
ARRESTS
Felony Warrants
2
0
Misdemeanor Warrants
16
2
•
L�
•
1
RUM: 31- MAY -90
CFS03
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO
0 VITY CODES: ALL
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09000 SPEEDING
09001 J-SPEEDING
09002 MO 0 /L, EXPIRED D/L
09003 J -NO D/L, EXPIRED D/L
09004 RESTRICTED D/L
09006 TEST REFUSAL
09010 BAC OVER .10
09014 STOP SIGN
09016 FAILURE TO YIELD
09018 EQUIPMENT VIOLATION
*EXHIBITION DRIVING
09023 J-EXHIBITION DRIVING
09027 J -OVER THE CENTER LINE
09030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION
09034 STOP ARM VIOLATION
09040 NO SEATBELT
09041 J-NO SEATBELT
09100 PARKING /ALL OTHER
09150 NO TRAILER PARKING
09200 DAS /DAR /DAC
09210 PLATES /NO-IMPROPER-EXPIRED
09220 NO INSURANCE /PROOF OF
09301 LOST PERSONS
r - I
LJ
INSTALLATION NAME MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 1
E N F 0 R S
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
0:/26/90 THRU 05/25/90
- - - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - - -
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 - 3TAL
15 19
3
1 19 9
3 1
7
3
1
1
1
1
E
65
7
2
2
1
1
6
S
1
2
2
1
1
3
1
20
2
17
8
10
16
1
2
1 287
1
7
1
3
1
2
3
2
i
2
t
1
2
7
5 4
3
1
5
3
2
5
2
10
8
2
2
4
2
3 4
7
2
i
1
t
65
7
2
2
1
1
6
S
1
2
2
1
1
3
1
20
2
17
8
10
16
1
2
1 287
RUN: 31- MAY-90 INSTALLATION NAME MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 2
CFS03 ••••••
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E M F O R S
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL CALLS FOR SERVICE
AC TIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
D4/26/90 THRU 05 /25/90
ACT
- - - - - - - - - - -
PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - - -
CODE
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
10
20
30
40
50 60 70 BO 90
TOTAL
04309
FOUND /RLNIAYAY
1
1
09311
FOUND PERSONS
1
1
09312
FOUND ANIMALS /IMPOUNDS
3
1
2
6
04313
FOUND PROPERTY
3
4
1
8
09430
PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS
1
1
09450
PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS
1
2
1
4
1 1
10
09561
DOG BITE
1
1
09563
DOG AT LARGE
1
1
2
09564
DOG BARKING
1
1
09565
DOG LICENSE
1
1
2
09710
ATTEMPTED SUICIDE
1
1
2
09720
SUDDEN DEATHS /BODIES FOUND
1
1
09730
MEDICALS
4
4
6
3
11 1 1
30
09731
DETO%-MEDICALS
2
1
4
3
2
12
D9732
CRISIS INT.- MEDICALS
1
1
09800
All OTHER /UNCLASSIFIED
1
2
2
1
1
7
09801
DOW STIC /NO ASSAULT
2
2
4
09960
ALL MCCP CASES
1
5
2
8
09904
OPEN DOOR /ALARMS
2
2
09913
CHIPS
1
1
2
09930
HANDGUN APPLICATION
1
1
1
3
04^44
UNWANTED GUEST
1
1
09945
SUSPICIOUS PERSON
1
1
•
•
RUN: 31- 14AY -90
CFS03
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? b0
0 IVITY CODES: ALL
INSTALLATION MAKE MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
E N F 0 R S
CALLS FOR SE.VICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
04/26/90 THRU 05/25/90
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
09950 INTELLIGENCE
09980 WARRANTS
09990 MISC. VIOLATIONS
09992 MUTUAL AID /8100
A2231 ASLT 2-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-KNIFE ETC-ADLT -FAM
A5352 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- HANDS-ADLT -ACO
A5353 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- HANDS-ADLT-STR
A5354 ASLT 5- INiLICTS ATTEMPTS MRM- HAWS-CHLD-FAM
A5355 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HR14-NANDS-CHLD-ACO
A5356 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS NRM- NAMOS-CHLD -STR
A& ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM -UNK WEAP- CHLD-ACO
A8600 ASLT- COERCION-MS-THREAT DMGE PROP-UNK RELAT
83334 BURG 3 -UNOCC RES IRC -D -UNK WEAP•COM THEFT
84990 BURG 4 -AT FRC RES-U-UNK WEAP -UNK ACT
D8500 DRUGS-SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSSESSION
13060 CRIM AGNST FAM- MS-N.GLECT OF A CHILD
J2500 TRAFFIC-GM -DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
J2700 TRAF•ACCID-GM- AGGRAVATED VIOLATION
J3500 TPAF- ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
L3074 CSC 2-UNK ACT-AC(XAINT- 13-15-M
M3005 JUVENILE USE OF TOBACCO
M4199 L I QUOR - OTHER
M5350 RUNAWAY
f 1
1
PAGE 3
- - - - - - - -
- . -
PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - - -
10 20
30
40
53 60 70 80 90
TOTAL
1
1
3 3
8
5
1
20
1
1
2
1
4
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
4
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
4
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
T
2
1 1
1
3
6
) ?89
RUN: 31- MAY -90
CFS03
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL
INSTALLATION NAME MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
E N f 0 R S
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
04/26/90 THRU 05 /25/90
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
M6501 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA - POSSESSION
N3080 DISTURB PEACE- MS-INTERFEIE WITH PRIVACY
N3190 DISTURB PEACE COMMUNICATIONS
03882 OBSENITY MS PHONE CALL-ADULT
P1110 PROP DAMAGE-FE-PRIVATE - UNK INTENT
P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT
P3130 PROP DAMAGE-MS-SUSINESS-UNK 14TENT
P3310 TRESPASS INTENT
T1029 THEFT-MORE $2500 -FE -FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP
T2029 THEFT -$251 - $2500- FE-FRM BUILDING PROP
T2059 THEFT425 YARDS -0TH PROP
T2169 THEFT -$251- 52500 -FE ARM WATERCRAFT -0TH PROP
T4021 THEFT -$250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING
T4029 THEFT4250 LESS- MS-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP
T4069 THEFT-%250 LESS-MS-FRM MAIL -0TH PROP
T4',55 THEFT-250 LESS-MS -FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-FIREARMS
T4159 THEFT-S250 LESS -MS - FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
U1014 THEFT -FE -BY CHECK-S301 -5500
U1503 THEFT- FE- BOAT-NO MOTOR-501 -2500
U3029 THEFT- MS-ISSA-IE WORTHLES CHECK - S200 OR LESS
U3492 THEFT -AS- BICYCLE -NO NOTOR -2501 -19999
U3496 THEFT MS BICYCLE -ND MOTOR -250 LESS
V2021 VEH THEFT- FE-S251 52500 AUTO
PAGE 4
•
- - - - - - - - - - -
PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - - -
10 20 30
40
50 60 70 80 90
TOTAL
1
1
2
1
1
1 1
2
1
1
1 1 1
3
1 1 3
5
1
1
1 1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
2
1
1
•
I Tio
RUN: 31- NAY -90
CFSO3
PRIMARY ISM'S ONLY? NO
is IVITY CODES: ALL
ACT
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
INSTALLATION NAME MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
E N F O R S
CAMS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
04/26/90 TNRU 05/25/90
V2026 THEFT OF BICYCLE-MOTORIZFD - 25' 2500
u3:90 WEAPONS -MS- USES -OTHER TYPE -NO CHAR
W3980 WEAPONS -MS -OTHER ACT- FIREWORKS-NO CHAR
Y2230 CRIM AGNST GOVN -GM- ESCAPE TAX -MTR VEH
REPORT TOTALS:
.7
PAGE S
- - - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - - -
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
68 58
98
88
68
4 1
4
389
PI/
RUN: 31- MAY -90 INSTALLATION NAME MOM POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE
2
OFF01
••••••
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO
E N F 0
R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL
OFFENSE ACTIVITY
BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL
04/26/90 THRU
05 /25/90
/------
------ ---- OFFENSES
CLEARED
--- --------------/
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES
ACTUAL
-- --BY ARREST - - --
BY
TOTAL
PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNFOUNDED
OFFENSES
PENDING
ADULT
JUVENILE
EXCEPTION
CLEARED
CLEARED
13074 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
CSC 2 ACT 13 - 15 - M
113005 1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
100.0
Jl1VENILE OF TOBACCO
"4199 2
0
2
0
1
1
0
2
100.0
LIQUOR - OTHER
M5350 5
0
5
0
0
1
4
S
100.0
RUNAWAY
M6501 2
0
2
0
2
0
0
2
100.0
DRUG PARAPHERNALIA POSSESSION
N3080 1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
100.0
DISTURB PEACE -MS- INTERFERE WITH PRIVACY
N3190 4
0
4
3
0
O
1
1
2510
DISTURB PEACE- MS-NARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
03882 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
OBSENITY - MS - OBSCENE PHONE CALL - ADULT
P1110 3
0
3
2
1
0
0
1
33.3
PROP DAMAGE FE PRIVATE INTENT
P3110 5
0
5
4
0
1
0
1
20.0
PROP DAMAGE -MS-PRIVATE -LINK INTENT
P3130 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
PROP DAMAGE BUSINESS - UNK INTENT
P3310 2
0
2
0
0
2
0
2
100.0
TRESPASS - MS PRIVATE -LINK INTENT
T1029 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT -MORE 52500- FE-FRM BUILDING - OTM PROP
T2029 1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
100
THEFT 4251 -52500 FE - FRM BUILDING -OTM PROP
72059 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
TMEFT-S251 -%2500 FE-FRM YARDS - OTM PROP
•
I�92
RUM: 31 MAY -90 INSTALLATION MAKE MOLM POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE
1
OFFO1
• • • •
• •
PRIMARY ISM'S ONLY? NO
E M F O
R S
D TION CODES: ALL
VITY CODES: ALL
OFFENSE
ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL
04 /26/90 THRU
05 /25190
/--
---- ---- - -- - -- OFFENSES
CLEARED
-----------------/
ACTIVITY CODE; OFFENSES
ACTUAL
- -- -BY ARREST - - --
BY
TOTAL
PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNFOUNDED
OFFENSES
PENDING
ADULT
JUVENILE
EXCEPTION
CLEARED
CLEARED
A2231 1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
100.0
ASLT 2-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY-KNIFE ETC- ADLI -FAM
A5352 1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
100.0
ASLT 5- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- HANDS- ADLT -ACO
A5353 1
G
1
0
0
0
1
1
100.0
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANOS- ADLT-STR
A5354 4
1
3
2
0
0
1
1
33.3
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- HAMDS-CHLD -FAM
A5355 1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
100.0
ASLT 5- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- HANDS- CHLD-ACO
A5356 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
ASLT 5 ATTEMPTS HRM HANDS
A� 1
0
1
1
0
O
0
0
.0
A THRT BODILY HARM - UMK YEAP
A8600 1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
100.0
ASLT-COERCION -MS- THREAT DMGE DROP -UMK RELAT
83334 1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
100.0
BURG 3 RES FRC HEAP THEFT
84990 1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
BURG 4-AT FRC RES -U -UNK HEAP - UNK ACT
D85DO 1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
100.0
DRUGS SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA - POSSESSION
13060 4
3
1
0
0
0
1
1
100.0
CRIM AGNST FAM-MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD
J2500 1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
100.0
TRAFFIC-GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIOl10R
1 :700 2
0
2
0
2
0
0
2
100.0
TRAF ACCID GM A; RAVATED VIOLATION
1 35.i^ 5
5
0
5
0
0
5
100.0
TRAF ACCID-MS DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIOl10R
1 !
J
1 ?73
RUN: 31- MAY -90 INSTALLATION NAME NM MD POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE
3
OFF01
••••••
PRIMARY ISM'S ONLY? NO
E N F 0
R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL
OFFENSE
ACTIVITY
BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL
04 /26/90 THRU
05 /25/90
/---------
----- -- OFFENSES
CLEARED
---- --------• ----/
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES
ACTUAL
- ---BY
ARREST- - --
BY
TOTAL
PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------..
OFFENSES
PENDING
ADULT
JUVENILE
EXCEPTION
...............................
CLEARED
CLEARED
T2169 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT- %251-%2500-FE-FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP
T4021 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT -%250 LESS- NS -FRM BUILDING-MONEY
T4029 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT -1250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING - OTN PROP
TG069 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT -%250 LESS- NS -FRM MAIL-OTH PROP
T4155 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT -250 LESS -MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE- FIREARMS
T4159 2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT4250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
U1014 1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
10*
THEFT -FE-BY CHECK-S301 -5500
U1503 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
G
.0
THEFT -FE- BOAT -MO MOTOR -501 -2500
U3028 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT -MS -ISSUE YORTHLES CHECK - S200 OR LESS
U3492 1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
100.0
THEFT -MS-BICTCLE -NO MOTOR- 2501 -19999
03496 2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT- NS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR -250 LESS
V2026 1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
100.0
THEFT Of BICYCLE - MOTORIZED- FE-251-2500
W3190 2
0
2
0
1
0
1
2
100.0
W APONS-MS-USES -OTHER TYPE -NO CHAR
W39M 1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
100.0
U&APONS-MS-OTHER ACT-FIRE110RKS-NO CHAR
V2230 1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
100.0
CRIM AGNST GOVN GM ESCAPE TAX-14TR VEH
r1
L_ J
I I
RUN: 31- MAT -90 INSTALLATION NAME MOUND POLICE DEPARTMEOT PAGE 4
OFF01 •••••
Ptlj&Y Z OS E M r O R S
T ION ION CODE : AL L
IVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 04/26/90 TNRU 05/2S/90
/----------- ---- OFFENSES CLEARED ----- ------- - - - --/
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL - - - -BY ARREST - - -- BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
-------------------------------- ----------- --------------- ----- I ----------------------- - ------------- ------ -------------------------
REPORT TOTALS - 75 S 70 29 18 9 14 41 58.5
•
•
)7�s
17J
HOUND POLICE RESERVES
NONTHLY HOURS
MAY, 1990
BADGE 0
1
4
5
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
23
28
56
59
57
58
TOTAL
DETAILS
EMER RES.
COMM
M/r TRAIN
INSTR
RIDE
MEET
C/0 SQUAD
- .ERV
BAIL ING
TION
ALONG
ADMIN
ING
4.0
-
6.0
23.0
1.0
13.0 -
4.0
4.0
2.0
6.5
1.5
1.0
3.5 6.5
3.0
-
-
17.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
1.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
5.0
8.5
1.0
3.0 6.5
-
4.0
-
6.0 0
3.0
4.5
T.5
1.0
2.0
4.5
-
TOTAL
34.0
32.0
32.5
0
2.0
0
0
4.0
20.5
0
0
13.5
31.5 13.0 20.5 0 17.0 10.5 35.5 29.0 6.0 163.0
MONTHLY ACTIVITIES
Emergency Call Outs
Parade
Safety Days
Class on Gangs 3 Narcotics
CDR
R1 Melton
R4 Fleming
R5 Fox
RIO Swanson
R11 Romain
1112 Shell
R13 Larson
R14 Zuccaro
In Training
K. Larson
R. Jazowski
R16 Hawks
R17 Kohman
R23 Vogel
R28 Geyen
R56 Fox, K.
R59 Jazowski
•
0
MOUND POLICE RESERVES
SEVERENCE ACCOUNTS
MAY, 1990
•
•
Q FFICER
DEPOSIT
BALANCE
Butch Hawks
519.50
!434.00
Ruth Vogel
0
498.50
Steve Kohman
0
104.00
Sherry 2uccaro
0
162.50
Dove Nelson
0
298.00
John Romain
0
149.00
Jeff Fleming
26.00
208.00
Makiko Swanson
0
6.50
Tom Geyen
13.00
78.00
Jim Fox
19.50
130.00
Damion Shell
0
39.00
Katie Fox
19.50
162.50
TOTALS
597.50
%2,2
KF /sh
2
/717
(TV) OI N1()('rl
June 4, 1990
TO: MAYOR, CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL
FROM: JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER
RE: MAY MONTHLY REPORT
An Occasional April Shower
Saw Sales Tower,
While May's C ^nstant Rain
Brought Little Gaii.
0
As you know by now, the summer months around here are extremely
critical. This is the pivotal period of the year that will
determine our annual success or demise. If it is rainy and cold, is
sales falter. If it is hot and sunny, sales soar. This
hypothesis is confirmed by comparing the weather patterns of
April and May.
Though the days in
of May of 1989 by
when you take into
placed the rate of
at 6.7 (Minneat)(_..
ground.
May were dreary, we did manage to nudge ahead
$1562. On the surface, this looks okay, but
consideration that the consumer price index
inflation after the first quarter of this year
s Star Tribune, May 25, 1990) we a tually lost
Figures to date this year look like this:
Sales - $ 367,134. Last year sales - $ 338,217.
Customers - 36,334. Last year - 35,156
I believe there is a conspiracy brewing this year. Perhaps after
the drought of 1988 & 1989, all the midwest farmers banned
together and bPpan employing rain makers. To counteract this
treachery, all operators of beer outlets should call Paul
Douglas, Walt Lyons, Bud Krahling, et al, and see if we could get
a little cooperation this summer.
JK.is
I i I L
C F VY I N 1( A '.'\I
MAY 1990 MONTHLY REPORT l
PARK DEPARTMENT
J
Parks
With the wet spring that we have been going through, the mowing
has been our first priority. The dandelions seem to be growing
faster when we mow them. If you do see an area that looks in
need of mow.'ng, please note that the grass is low and not in need
of cutting, but the dandelions are. We have a ten day schedule
turn - around for mowing, except in high use parks like Mound Bay,
Philbrook or Swenson.
The beach weed pick -up has begun on a weekly basis at Mound Bay
• due to it only being open on weekends. The other beaches will be
added as they open in mid -June. When we are ire full swing, the
weed removal from Mound Bay, Canary, Wychwood, Pembroke, and Cen-
tery i ew beaches takes up a good part of the morning for two of
the seasonal help. Also in ' mornings, two other summer hel-
pers visit each park for garbage pick -up and general inspection
of the areas.
Not all of the new park signs have been installed yet. We have
one large planter left and seven of the smaller post types. When
we finish, we will have installed eleven planter style and thir-
teen pos` type signs.
The City Engineer has made some recommendations for basic im-
provements at the Park Department's maintenance garage on the Is-
land. these repairs are much needed to preserve the building and
provide a safe place to work.
C Docks
All of this rain has helped the lake level, but still the low
water has created some problems. As the lake has gone down,
questions have come up about dock locations. Because the
shoreline is not perfectl/ straight, docks are moved out from the
ordinary high water mark, thus creating a variety of possible
problems such as sparing becoming closer. Dell Rudolph has been
handling these areas and has been able to resolve the problems
with the cooperation of the dock site holders.
799
•
May 1990 Monthly Report
Park Department
Page Z
Cemetery
The new caretaker, Phil Haugen, has been doing an excellent ,job
on the grounds. The weather has cooperated with rain to allow
the grass to come back. Memorial Day went through with no
problems and we did receive compliments on the grounds and the
new signs. Currently, we are looking into getting a new flag
pole installed by a local organization at no cost to the City.
Tr ee Removals /Weed Not ices
Ten dead hazardous trees have been removed from City property.
One forced tree remo\al was done on private property. Six weed
notices were sent out- in Jy, along with the Balboa site next to
SuperAmerica. The spraying of the City's retaining wails has
begun and the sidewalks will soon follow.
JF
•
•
Fla
v�E MINNf To �'F
7
M
s -SA ni UK E
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
402 EAST LAKE STR''ET WAYZATA MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 612/473 -7033
EUGENE R. STROMMEN FXFCUTIVF DIRECTOR
BOARD MEMBERS
David H C+x bran Chair
G'80—oci
Albert O Foste, . ViCe Char
Deephaven
Jan Boswinkel. Secretary
Minnetonka Bench
John Lew -an, Treasurer
MI ^nelnsta
Douglas E Babcock
Spring Park
Marv- B)orlin
Tonka Hay
Jaynes N Grathwol
F xr el4ior
JuEllen L Nurr
On no
John (, Mal,n ka
Victoria
Thomas Martinson
Wayrata
Hobert K Pills Miry
Minnetonka
Hobert Rascop
Shorevy<x�d
Thomas W HBeSe
Mound
Hubert F Slocum
Wtxalland
a
TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: JUNE 7, 1990
FROM: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE
SUBJECT: MAY REPORT - LMCD
1. GENERAL INTEREST ITEMS
1.1 Eurasion Watermilfoil Tack Forc
The harvesting operation commenced on May 29th. Thru
Monday, June 4th, 60 acres have been harvested. One day was lost
due to high winds. The crew is still ascending the learning
curve. Efficiencies will increase sharply in the next two weeks.
We are confortable that we have made the correct decision in
concluding to run the operation ourselves.
We are still $16,000 short of the goal of $55,000 from
private donors. It is still felt that as the operation gets more
publicity, and people can see the good that it is doing, more funds
will come in.
con n utton to t e proceedings. It is unfortunate that more
elected officials from cities around the lake were not present to
take part in the hearing. The hearing items will be reviewed by
the Advisory Committee on June 20th.
1.3 Other General Interest Items-
The personal water craft ordinance has been approved and
enacted. The 30 minute limit on prolonged operation was
included in the final draft. I feel that this provision will go a
long ways toward protecting lake shore residents and anchored
boaters from the annoying noise of these machines.
The UFO program is in operation. Bouys are on hand and a
method of responding to lake user calls is in place. .
1.2. Comprehensive Lake Management Plan
The public heating was held for final inputs to the plan.
As usual Mound led the others in making an appropriate
t 'b h
2.0 CITY SPECIFIC ITEMS • MOUND
Gene Strommcn has been working with Jim Fackler to
re olve issu that Ned Podany, 6165 Sinclair Rd, has had with
me M Y Vdocks.
om Reese
Mound Representative
• Lake M - -tonka Conservation District
TR:mac
cc. Gene Strommen
• . MOUND POLICE
- - 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472 -3711 •
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544 -9511
LEN HARRELL EMERGENCY 911
Chief of Police
May 24, 1990
TO: Ed Shukle
FROM: Len Harrell
SUBJECT: Physical Fitness Specialist Course
I recently attended the Institute for Aerobic Research in Dallas,
Texas, to be certified to administer fitness testing and to
assess individuals' levels of fitness. The course was very
intense; including both academic course work and physical testing
and training.
The course consisted of instruction in law enforcement fitness
needs, risk factors and physical fitness, individual screening
and assessment, anatomy /kinesiology, exercise physiology, nutri-
tion and weight control, motivation /behavior modification, fit-
ness standards for law enforcement, and different modes of train-
ing for fitness. 0
The course was taught by college level professionals with creden-
tials in exercise physiology, nutrition, and medicine. One sec-
tion of instruction was given by Dr. Kenneth Cooper, the "guru"
on aerobic fitness. The course emphasized an eight step process,
Personalized Aerobics Lifestyle System (PALS), which involves su-
pervision, screening, education, assessment, motivation, goal
structure, feedback, exercise and nutrition.
As a certified fitness specialist, I have been trained to do in-
dividual screenings and fitness assessments, to set up exercise
programs based on individual needs and goals, and to administer
physical testing procedures using the protocol developed by the
IAR.
I have also formulated a recommendation for equipment to be util-
ized in our exercise /EOC area based on a "best fit" for our work
environment and space available. Three basic items would be a
Universal Gym (approximately 600 lbs.), an Airdyne bicycle, and a
Nordic Trac. The total cost for the three items would be ap-
proximately $3,000.
I loot, forward to further discussion on a City program for those
interested and re- implementing the police program with some
modifications. 0
ga_
Invitute for Aerobics Rese
DaIIas, Texas
Fitness Specialist Cbllz'ee
The ww"hods employed will be a ambinaticrn of the fol= owing:
1. Is. - tore - slide presentaticn
2. Dencratration of tadmiques
3. Practiaum in developing written irdividsal and group program
4. Supervised practice in performing exorcise and exercise leadership
C= ft t r - _ X f i•�� � .
1- FitrVISIS Specialist ROGICtame • Page Rmal)
••. • •
3. Medical History, hugamwit, and borciaWRItriticn Pru�til
•M
g
A► practicasi eocaminaticn evaluating trainee's skills in fitness
assessment, sunrise and nutrition prseoripticn and written eocaminatian (104
alltiple choice items) covering total =Douse om*Ant is provided.
_0 -fe -.
01§0 N C
Cooper, FAnrath H., hN3j2Jg, New Yak: Bantams Books, 1972
•. 1
Johnson, B. and Nelson, J., PaGUMI ' in ical
MI MimAapojis, Ili: Burgess Publication OD., 1975 RMUlemen,
c., Physical Fitness Phc+yalapedia, Omm, FA: Aodale Prises, 1972.
Pollock, M., Wil=*, J. and lbx, S., Health Fitmm Phvsical
y y, Scmuset, NJ: Jahn Wiley i Sore, 1978
9
),903
Institute for Aerobics Research
- - - -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- - - - - -- Da l l z s, Te x l s
•
Aerobics Carter Fitness Ieadership
Training and Certification ft%W n
Fitness Specialist 0="se Syllabus
CMArse Goal Trainees can master the basic facts, carceepts, Principles and
skills of develcp" - 1 and implementing individual physical fitness Programs
within their specialized setting.
Objective 1 : Trainees can define the variables and importance of physical
fitness for health and mwall llahctiming.
1.1 Trainees can rum l important research findings relating
fitness to physical health dimensions such as coronary artery
disease.
1.2 Trainees can om aarize the rationale far physical fitness as a
factor for emoticn l and intellectUal functicning.
1.3 Trainees can define the role e=rcise plays in stress
management•
1.4 Trainees can define the of fitness to
productivity, absenteeism, and emplayes perfcrmanoe.
1.5 Trainees can dalineats a modal of wellness a000hn*Am for age
and sex differeshces.
gjgqtjy% 2: Trainees can d4 2crImI ns te the most izpw Cant pr 4 r ciples of
exercise physiology.
2.1 Trainees can define the Avcticns and dynemhias of aerobic
capacity• 0
q oO 11
• 2.2 Trairras can list the ma wwwW sub systems.
2.3 Trainees can list the physiological affects of waarcise.
2.4 Trainees can list the major principles of corditianinq.
2.5 Trainees can dafine the major components of the 0 trar:eport
systam and rM=MMOIIAr systes.
Cbiectivs 3 : ZYainess can di scri mi nate the most important principles of
anatomy and kinesiolocy.
3.1 Trainees can recall the dynamics of mwcle movema it
3.2 rinses can describe the najcc anatcmV of the umcular cystma.
3.3 Trainees can list the major motion and mechanics of body
nDV�IStiltt.
4.1 Trams cm list methods floc defining individual needs.
4.2 Trainees can die=Imireft - -alsvant legal liability issues.
4.3 Trainees can dafins the major manargwaam* ftctions far
Pte•
. 5 . 1 Trainees can recall high risk sc rrwdxq optiaae.
12
l FOS
Institute for Aerobics Research
Dallas, Texas
5.2 Tiaineas can demaetzate Health Hazard Appraisal msthoss.
3.3 TZainses can dame —trate blood pressure assessment.
5.4 Trainees can d=Wattats resting heart rats assaesmrstt.
objective 6 : Trainees can dsmo<rtrato mastery in employing fitness
assessment tedrdquss.
6.1 Trainees can d®onstrate flexibility assssawtt techniques.
6.2 Trainees can dsmoretrab cardiorespiratory assessment
tadhniquas•
6.3 nminoas can dewonstrats strength assaesment tSd dgMS-
6.4 TV%ineas can demontstrate body fat assasem M tedhrl 4M •
objective 7 : Trainees can I in developing written
exarcise methods for qr ups and individals. 0
` r. r • . •
gjective : Trainees Can define n zlwit on and dietary methods far fitness.
8.1 Trainees can discriairtate the oaaQactier, of a balsnoed dint for
general nutrition.
8.2 Trainess can d strab the Calorie method far waW owt=l
prescriptions.
8.3 Trainees can a monit vd diet to aonttvl oor+aO Y
risk faCtors. •
8.4 Trainees can develop a mitritinnal prescription.
` , 1QL 13
9.1 Trainees can dsamaretrata pulse rata mcnitMIM guidelines.
9.2 Trainees Can define dvW signals for stress.
9.3 Trainees can define awgw y prooslim.
9.4 Trainees Can demonstrate CPR skills.
9.5 Trainees Can define and dsmmwtrate leadsz*4 methods that
irware safety and fitness acquisition.
Objective- 10 : Trainees can dr4olop motivational and rainfor+osmsnt
strategies.
10.1 Trainees can generate a and motivation nodal for
., • . .
The nxeber am factor for delivery of a wnooesstul pa<Cgrast is to Control for
adherence.
The kay elm of waa:s■s are staff leadership, pmgm and aargsnizational
factors.
•. .. .,
The translation of the Casson dwainstars vith an a step pa<tiass define
the Rw alist Omwoe.
•
14
► ?o?
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
May 21, 1990
Those present were: Vice Chair Geoff Michael, Commissioners
Jerry Clapsaddle, Michael Mueller, Frank Weiland, Bill Thal, Bill
Voss, and Ken Smith, Council Representative Liz Jensen, City
Manager Ed Shukle, City Planner Mark Koegler, and Secretary Peggy
James. Absent and excused was: Chair Bill Meyer.
MINUTES:
MOTION made by Voss. seconded by Weiland to approve the
Planning Commission Minutes of May 7, 1990 as submitted.
Motion carried unanimously.
BOARD OF APPEALS:
a. Case No. 87 -663: Brian d Mae Johnson, 4945 glen Elyn
Road, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Block 24, Shadvwood Point, PIO
813- 117 -24 -11 0049. Extension of Resolution 187 -179.
City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed his recommendation for ap-
proval of a one year extension of Resolution 87 -179.
The Commission determined that since the applicants were not
present, they would review the other cases on the agenda first.
b. Case No 90 -920: Jerry Kust, 2731 Rosewood Lane, Lot IQ, •
81ock 2, Batdorf's 1st Addition., PiD 823- 117 -24 -24 0036.
VARIANCE: Existing Nonconforming Setback.
City Planner, Mark Koegler explained the applicants request to
construct a 12' x 26' three season porch with conforming setbacks
to an existing nonconforming structure. The existing structure
is setback 23.4 feet from Rosewood Lane, the required setback is
30 feet.
Staff recommended approval of the 6.6 foot setback variance to
recognize the existing non - conforming front setback for the pur-
poses of constructing a conforming screened porch.
MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Mueller, to recom-
mend approval per staff's recommendation. Motion
carried unanimously.
This case will be heard by the City Council on May 22, 1990.
C. Case No 90 -921: Wes Olsen, 2539 Emerald Drive, Lots 6 9 7:
8 1 ock 6, Shirley HI i Is U n i t B, P I D 824-117-24-12 0041.
VARIANCE: Request to Modify Resolution 888 -179.
City Planner, Mark Koegler, referred to the extensive history of
this case as outlined in his recommendation. Koegler explained
that after Resolution #88 -179 was adopted, which required removal
of the garage, the garage then became an illegal non - conforming
��1
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 1990
• Page 2
use. In order for Mr. Olsen to keep his garage, a variance must
be granted. Koegi informed the Commission that he conferred
with the City Engi „eer about the possibility of vacating Ruby
Lane, however, it was not recommended.
Staff recommended denial of the proposed modification of the
resolution granting a variance for the existing garage.
Applicant, Mr. Wes Olsen, reviewed the history of ,;his case and
made the following comments: he wishes tc keep the garage, the
garage s`ts 22 feet from the pavement, the garage is structurally
sound, the neighbors garage is 2.5' closer to Ruby Lane than his
garage, he did not know the garage had to be removed when he pur-
chased the house, he does not wish to vacate Ruby Lane, Fa ►.ould
like to improve the garage, however, has not done so to -date
since it was not recommended until this issue was resolved, and
he was quoted the amount of $1,500 to remove the garage.
Frank Ma *achek, Mr. Olsen's neighbor, spoke in favor of removing
the garage.
Thal asked Mr. Olsen when the electricity was installed in the
garage. Mr. Olsen informed the Commission that it was installed
before he purchased the house.
Mueller commented that Mr. Olsen could take the contractor to
court for restitution since he did not remove the garage as he
promised to do. Mueller also compared this request to other
variances that have been granted to properties where their was a
greater encroachment involved. Some Commissioners argued that
each case is different and their are different circumstances with
each case to consider.
Thal commented on the fact that a hardship does not exist to al-
low this garage; their is plenty of available yard space to con -
ruct a conforming attached or detached garage.
Mueller commented that Ruby Lane is not a busy street. Mr.
Matachek stated that Ruby Lane is a well traveled street; he has
counted eight or nine cars pass in one half a day.
Afte- further discussion, the following motion was made:
MOTION made by Thal, seconded by Weiland, to deny the
request as recommended by staff. Motion carried 7 to I
(those in favor were: Clapsaddle, Welland, Thal,
Michael, Jensen, Voss, and Smith: those opposed were:
• Mueller).
Mue I 1 er exp 1 a i ned that he was not i n favor of the mot i on due to
previous actions of the Planning Commission recommAnding a
variance be granted for a property on a busier road, with a
garage closer to the street than this one. /DOp
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 1990
Page 3 .
Mr. Wes Olsen expressed his unhappiness with the Planning
Commission's recommendation.
This case will be reviewed by the City Council on June 12, 1990.
a. Case No. 87 -663: Brian 9 Maria Johnson, 4945 Glen Elyn
Road, Part of Lots 17 and 18, Block 24, Shadvwood Point, PIO
#13- 117 -24 -11 0049. Extension of Resolution 1187 -179.
Discussion relating to this ease was continued from earlier in
the meeting. Since the applicant was not present, the City
Manager recommended that the request be tabled.
MOTION made by Thal, seconded by Voss to table the
request until the next Planning Conmisslon meeting of
June 11, 1990. Motion carried unanimously.
DNR Applications *90 -6264 and #90 -6282.
The Planning Commission had no comments on these applications.
Continued review of the Proposed Rental Housing Maintenance Code:
Section 319:60, 1 3st sentence: Need to check with attorney. The •
sentence in question reads, "The Compliance Official shall keep
confidential all evidence, exclusive of the inspection record,
which he /she may discover or obtain in the course of an Inspec-
tion made pursuant to this section and such evidence shall be
considered privileged." Mueller feels the sentence was worded
poorly. What is the reasoning behind this statement? What does
"privileged" mean? Jensen suggested the following modification:
"The Compliance Official shall keep confidential all information
directly related to Section 319." What authority does this ac-
tually give the Compliance Official? Does this restrict the Com-
pliance Official from giving out information relating to a viola-
tion of the law? What are the rules of evidence?
Section 319:65: Notification of access by the Compliance Offi-
cial was discussed. How are people going to be notified that the
Compliance Official will be coming to inspect their homes? How
do we protect renter's rights from unauthorized entry? The Com-
mission determined that the City Attorney should create wording
relating to notification of access, and add a subdivision to
Sect 495:80 and Section 319:60 or 319:65
Secti 3 1 9 :70: Does Subd ?vision 2 imply that the Compliance Of-
ficial has authority to re -issue a revoked license? or dust a
suspended license? What is the process for revoking a license? •
The Commission would like the City Attorney to clarify this.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 21, 1990
Page 4
C7
S ection 319:75: The Commission agreed that the following should
be added to this section: " . . . safety and welfare of the
public, is secured with materials painted in consistency with the
exterior color and does not constitute a public nuisance."
Section 319:90, last sentence: It was noted that this sentence
Is not worded correctly, it could be a typo. Staff will inves-
tigate.
Section 319:100: Mueller questioned, how do you stop a closing
prior to it happening so you can notify the prospective purchaser
that their is lack of compliance? He would also like to see this
section state: "Any notice of non - compliance shall be posted and
It shall be unlawful to remove such until the Compliance Official
approves that the violation has been corrected." It was sug-
gested that any compliance order should be noted on the license,
and the license be posted on the exterior of the house. It was
determined that Secti 3 Subd. 4, should include a state-
ment Implying: "d. Every compliance order shall be posted on
the structure e ' noted on the license." Also, mention in the
licensing sectloi that all compliance orders shall be visible on
the license.
10 Section 319:105, fir sentence: A comma should be added after
the word " . . . appeal has expired,_ any . . ."
Secti 319:110, page 38, fourth line down: - be" should be "by ".
All of the suggested changes and questions from the Planning Com-
mission will be forwarded to the City Attorney for review.
City Council Representative Report.
Jensen reviewed the minutes of the May 8th City Council Meeting,
the Committee of the Whole Meeting of May 15th and the Agenda for
the May 22nd meeting.
Thal stated that he feels the City should require curb cuts for
all new houses being constructed.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Weiland to adjourn the
meeting at 10:32 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
Chair, Bill Meyer
•
Attest:
•
MINUTES - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - MAT 31, 1996
The meeting was called to order at 7 AM. Members present: Mark
Brewer Chic Remien, Fred Guttormson and Ben Marks. Absent:
Mayor Steve Smith, Tim Kenealy and Paul Meisel. Also present:
John Norman, Finance Director and Ed Shukle, City Manager.
Upon motion by Remien, seconded by Guttormson and carried
unanimously, the minutes of the May 15, 1990 meeting were
approved.
Discussion focused on the Implementation Section of the Downtown
Study. Reference was made to the May 15th minutes which had a
section on the priorities that the Commission had established at
the May 15th meeting. In reference to these priorities, facade
improvements was shifted to the category cf physical
improvements. Landscaping was also added to the physical
improvements as well aesthetics /code enforcement. Marketing was
discussed and it was the consensus to list marketing as target
marketing.
Motion was made by Remien, seconded by Guttormson and carried
unanimously to examine current ordinances regarding aesthetics on
minimum screening. The consensus was to contact Public Financial
Systems and VanDoren Hazard and Stallings and to have them put
together the final draft of the report for presentation at the
next EDC meeting which is scheduled for Thursday, June 21, 1990,
7 AM. Following that meeting, probably in July, the EDC will
meet with the City Council and the Planning Commission in a ,joint
meeting to present the Downtown Plan and discuss it in detail.
Upon motion by Guttormson, seconded by Remien and carried
unanimously, the meeting was adjourned at 8 :30 AM.
r Re ectfully submitted,
E hukl e
City Manager
ES: Is
•
1812
LAKE MINN[ IONKAG()N',A HVATION DISTRICT
NEWS RELEASE
Contact: Gene Strommen
• 473 -7033
May 21, 1,990 Tom Reese, Chair
Milfoil Task
Q�'D MAY 31 1990 Force
TOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 540 -2583
SUBJECT: Weed Harvest Begins on Lake Minnetonka May 29
Lake Minnetonka's famed "weedbusters" will be out in force Tuesday,
May 29, to begin the second Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD)
Eurasian water milioil weed harvesting program, according to Task Force
Chair Tom Reese, Mound.
A MN Department of Natural Resources weed harvesting permit has been
issued allowing 1,550 acres to be harvested in 1990, project manager Norm
Paurus reports. This compares with 667 acres which were harvested during
the 1989 season.
Open water areas will be harvested beyond docks in the normal boat
traffic patterns, Paurus further explained. With the launching in Spring
Park, harvesting will get underway in Spring Park Bay, and simultaneously
in Excelsior Bay. The weed harvesters will operate in pairs and move to
bays where boating activity is most intense.
The four LMCD weed harvesters, named during the 1989 season, are: Hattie
May, Saucy Kate, May Queen, and Belle. The names are historical references
to steamboats of the 19th century which operated on Lake Minnetonka.
A fifth weed harvester will join the LMCD team early in the season.
•l},,, tiUI)111 liennepin Regional Park District purchased a version similar
to LMCD's equipment from the same manufacturer. The intention is to have
it used on Lake Minnetonka most of the season. The Park District is also
providing weekly computer documentation of weed harvesting results.
LMc1) has undertaken its own operation of the weed harvesting program
(more) 1813
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
this vear," Executive Director Gene Strommen explained. "After reviewing
the 1989 experience, the Board supported a move to bring the operation 'in
house.' This involved hiring a project manager, field supervision, four
harvester operators, and two shore crew members."
Funding for the private support of the program is still underway, with
$20,000 remaining of its $55,000 goal. Contributions payable to the LMCD
"Save the Lake" fund may be sent to 402 East Lake Street, Wayzata, MN 55391.
X X X
•
I8) y
LAKE MINN E ION KA CONSERVATION DISIRi"T
NEWS RFILE'ASE
• May 21, 1990
REC'D MAY 31 1990
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
SUBJECT: Underwater Found Obstructions (UFO) to be
Marked Upon Citizen identification
Contact: Gene Strommen
Executive Director
473 -7033
Tom Reese
Task Force Chair
540 -2583
Boaters encountering an Underwater Found Obstruction (UFO) can perform
a "save the lake" service by calling them to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation
District's attention according to Task Force Chair Tom Reese, Mound.
Recognizing that there are occasional obstructions just under the
surface of Lake Minnetonka, the Board approved a plan to mark such UFO's
to warn boaters. Funds from the District's "Save the Lake" program will be
used to purchase officially- approved danger buoys with the added identifica-
tion of "ROCK" to designate the obstruction's presence. A $3,500 allocation
was approved for buoy purchases.
Person's identifying a UFO are asked to make a careful notation of the
object's lake location. Sitings on landmarks in at least three directions
are necessary. A small marker locator may be used for a temporary placement.
The next step is for the person finding the UFO to call in their name
aad information as to where they can be reached. Assistance in locating the
UFO will be required. The weed harvesting supervisory personnel will be
responsible to work -with the person finding the UFO to relocate and mark it.
UFO's are to be only those objects OUTSIDE the 150' distance from shore.
Boaters are required to move at no -wake speeds within 150' and be observant
for underwater conditions which always present the potential for t, ,)ating
hazards. Objects in a public channel or heavy traffic area should be
identified.
The approved danger buoys will befibe inches in diameter, white with
a bold orange diamond on two sides, and reflective orange borders on top & bottom.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
News Release, UFO, 5/21/90, P. 2
•
The word "ROCK" appears on two sides.
Larger shallow areas are marked by the Hennepin County Public Service
lakes improvement program. These are already marked with official danger
buoys as areas boats are not to enter. Similar areas are not included in
the UFO program, mainly because it is expected most are within the 150'
shore zone or are already marked as danger areas.
LMCD Chair Dave Cochran, Greenwood, and "Save the Lake" annual
campaign Chair Bob Pillsbury thank all boaters for their cooperation in
making this program work.
;!llld
•
•
/ ?/Z
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
May 23, 1990
F - I
L.J
WHO:
WHEN'
WHERE:
CONTACT:
PHOTO MEMO ALERT REST MAY 3 1 1990
"Eurasian Water Milfoil Weed Harvesting"
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District TLMCD1 Eurasian Water
Milfoil Weed Harvesting Operations Crew
Tuesday, May 29 -- starting at 7:30 am and continuing tnrougn-
out the day -- each day until approximately 4:00 pm -
through Friday, September 7 . • .
Spring Park Bay, County Road 15 at the intersection of County
Road 51 for May 29 -- and at various locations in the weeks
to follow.
Project Manager Norm Paurus, 471 -8639
Executive Director Gene Strommen, 473 -7033
The second year of harvesting Eurasian water milfoil on Lake
Minnetonka gets underway May 29- This year's operation is being conducted
by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District {LMCD }, utilizing its own crew
and the four United Marine International weed harvesters purchased in 1989•
The MN Department of Natural Resources has issued a 1990 permit
to harvest 1,550 acres of aquatic plants. This compares to 667 acres which
were harvested in 1989, using fewer m,chines on a shorter schedule.
Photographers interested in "on the machine" or close -up photo
opportunities can be accommodated. Advance notice of this interest is
preferred to keep your photo crew time on a expeditious schedule, and to
avoid waiting. Harvesting crews will be in full -scale operation starting
May 29- Weeds are hauled to nearby on -land compost disposal sites.
An enclosed brochure highlights the weed problem as it affects
the lake. All harvesting is done in the open areas of the lake to facilitate
recreational boat traffic.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PUBLIC SERVICE INTEREST.
•
ISi7
RECD MAY 3 1 190
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Action Report: Lake Use Committee
Meeting: Monday, May 21, 1990, 4:20 p.m.
LMCD Office, Wayzata
Members Present: Robert Pillsbury, Chair, Minnetonka, Marvin
Bjorlin, Tonka Bay; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Thomas Reese, Mound;
Robert Rascop, Shorewood. Also present: Sgt. Wm. Chandler,
Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol; Eugene Strommen,
Executive Director.
1. Water Patrol Report.
a. Charter Boat Inspection Progress: Chandler reported
twenty -two of twenty -four charter boats have been inspected.
Three will need re- inspection. Chandler has furnished the
Executive Director with inspection guideline suggestions to bring
the LMCD inspections in line with the Coast Guard inspections.
b. Fishing Opener Activity: Chandler reported there were
no problems.
C. Underwater Found Obstructions (UFO): Chandler, Reese,
Denis Bailey,Hennepin County Lakes Improvement and the executive
director have met to coordinate the program.
d. Marine Radio Broadcasts: Chandler reported the Water
Patrol has begun marine information broadcasts on Fridays, •
Saturdays and Sundays.
e. Guest Observers: Chandler reported the Pierre, South
Dakota Police Department is planning a water patrol activity in
their area and will be working with the Hennepin County Sheriff's
Water Patrol. He will furnish them with copies of the LMCD
Ordinances. They would also like to meet with LMCD members.
f. Incident Report: Chandler had no incidents to report.
2. Personal Watercraft Ordinance.
The committee received the amended ordinance as reviewed and
amended by the Board at their 4/25/90 meeting.
Foster suggested a change in Subd. 8. Age of Operator. He
recommends eliminating the first sentence which prohibits anyone
under the age of 13 from operating a personal watercraft.
Chandler agreed, stating common sense will dictate whether
someone under 13 is capable of operating a personal watercraft.
This gives that age group an opportunity to learn how to operate
a pwc.
Chandler called the members attention to Subd. 11. He
stated that as worded the water patrol could not issue a citation
to a personal watercraft. He asked for a wording which would
provide for citing an operator if in violation of the
Prolonged Operation section.
Foster moved, Reese seconded, to recommend approval of the
Personal Watercraft Ordinance third reading with the following
amendment: Subd. 8 Age of Operator. - Delete the first
sentence. Motion carried unanimously.
1°1S 1
Lake Use Committee May 21, 1990
Reese moved, Rascop seconded, to recommend approval of the
Personal Watercraft Ordinance third reading with the following
amendment: Subd. 11. Prolonged Operation. Add: Person in
control of such personal watercraft shall be subject to citation.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. Water Ski Slalom Course Request
Carey Manson and Westonka Water skiing residents requested
continuance of their permission to use their portable slalom
water ski course as allowed in previous years. They further
request a change in the observer rule.
Chandler reported the Water Patrol has had no problem with
this group of water skiers.
Foster moved, Reese seconded, continuation of the
arrangement for a slalom water ski course for Carey Mason and the
Westonka Water Ski Residents under the same terms and conditions
as 1989. Motion carried unanimously.
Observer: Foster expressed the opinion that the Ordinance
Section 3.10 Subd. 1, Observers Required while waterskiing on
Lake Minnetonka is too restrictive. He does not believe an
observer is needed during the week. Reese agreed that
elimination of the observer requirement during the week
encourages the use of the lake when no one else is using the
lake. Observers are needed during the weekend.
W. Jacques Gibbs, 4901 Three Points Blvd., Mound, a member
of the applicant organization, said they usually have enough
observers but there are occasions when the third person is not
available. They would use the curved mirror.
Foster moved, Reese seconded, to recommend an ordinance
change which would:
1. Eliminate the need for an observer on non - holiday
Mondays through Friday noon.
2. Require standard curved rear -view water skiing mirror
equipment on the boat when an observer is not used. (Required by
State Statute)
3. Eliminate the reference to "between Memorial Day and
Labor Day ".
4. Include a provision which would allow the Water Patrol
to require an observer when there is sufficient congestion on the
lake to warrant it in their judgment.
Motion carried, Rascop voting nay.
d. Special Event Application - Canoe Races At Lord Fletcher's
Lord Fletcher's Restaurant has made application for a
special event permit to hold canoe races in their lagoon area to
the edge of the channel and The Executive Director
reported Lord Flt-tcher's has a t:Ansient license which does not
allow off -lake storage. Since they are not a full service marina
they are not eligible for off -lake storage. They cannot apply
2 !8l r
Lake Use Committee
May 21, 1990
for a new dock license because of the moratorium. Boat traffic •
along the Coffee Channel area and in the applicant's own dock
use area was a matter of concern for safety.
Rascop moved, Foster seconded, to deny a special event
permit for canoe racy -, at Lord Fletcher's. Motion carried
unanimously.
5. Pontoon Boat Rental - Lord Fletcher's
Todd Streeter, 1550 Wayzata Blvd, Wayzata, proposed to rent
small (8' long x 7' wide) pontoon boats powered by battery -
operated trolling motors. The same conflict with the LMCD codes
generally apply to this proposal as did with the canoe races in
that the pontoons would require off -lake storage. It would also
require a license for launching boats.
Streeter explained the rental would be handled by Lord
Fletcher's. His organization has experience with the boats in
Florida and they handle surf well. In Streeter's opinion there
is reduced traffic at Lord Fletcher's because of the low water.
The rental would operate from 11 a.m. to 11 p.m. The craft have
approved lights. Bjorlin said they should have full life jackets
and not just seat - cushion flotation devices.
Reese spoke in favor of the proposal because the boats are
not noisy, do not make a wake and because of the low w ;tter the
district should encourage the lake shore businesses. .
A code amendment proposed by Attorney LeFevere to exempt
non - restricted watercraft from the off -lake storage ordinance and
farther exemption for 17' canoes as restricted watercraft was
introduced, copy attached.
Reese moved, Foster seconded, to recommend approval of the
pontoon boat. rental as proposed for Lord Fletcher's on a trial
basis fc >r one season, with no guarantee of renewal.
Rascop moved, Reese seconded, an amendment to the
recommendation which would ask Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel, to
carne to the 5/23 Board meeting prepared to discuss this proposal.
Motion carried unanimously.
The original motion as amended was approved unanimously.
6. Special Event Deposit Refund
Rascop moved, Reese seconded, to recommend a special event
deposit refund of $100 to Holiday- Johnson Crappie Contest having
t,, ourrf i rmed by the Water Patrol as creating no problems and no
rr. vin €; violations. Motion carried unanimously.
7. Citizen Complaint.
A i t: i,.r✓n complaint concerning wakes at the approach to the
('i t,y �,f Way:.ata docks on Wayzata Bay at Broadway Avenue near
rf� ,t,, -� ,rant was reviewed by the executive director. The
rn{ l :, i r, t , ,,imo from a nearby buoy user whose sailboat is in
Fxf ') f ; OU , f rom shore just east of the dock use area. He
I ��D 3
Lake Use Committee
May 21, 1990
requested a "Slow" buoy in that area. An inquiry to the City of
Wayzata indicates they have had no complaints. This distance
from shore was concluded too far to begin a slow designation as
requested. No action was taken. The Executive Director will
call the complainant.
8. Minnetonka Power Squadron
The Minnetonka Power Squadron request for location of a
"Slog:" buoy at the channel through Big Island will be reviewed on
the June 9 lake tour. It was recommended the Minnetonka Power
Squadron Commander be invited on the lake inspection tour.
9. Ad3ournment
Reese moved, P.ascop seconded, that the meeting be adjourned.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:20 p.m.
FOR THE COMM I TTF.E :
Eugene Strommen, Executive Director Robert Pillsbury, Chair
:7
.7
l8a J
.1
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
473 -7033 IE D MAY 31 1990
E V E N T S S C H E D U L E •
JUNE 1990
Saturdays
10:00
AM
Yacht
Club
Races -
Lower
Lake
2:00
PM
to
it
11
it
It
2:00
PM
If
If
i
Upper
Lake
Sundays
10:00
AM
Yacht
Club
Races -
Lower
Lake
10:30
AM
to
"
to
Upper
Lake
(beginning 6/10)
1:30
PM
if
"
It
Lower
Lake
Mondays
6:30
PM
Yacht
Club
Races -
Lower
Lake
Tuesdays
6:00
PM
Yacht
Club
Races -
Lower
Lake
Wednesdays
5:30
PM
Wednesday Night Bass Tournement - Goose Island
(beginning
6/13)
6:00
PM
Yacht
Club
Races -
Lower
Lake
(6:15 on 6/13)
6:30
PM
Upper
Lake
Thursdays
6:15
PM
Yacht
Club
Races -
Lower
Lake
Fridays
6:00
PM
Yacht
Club
Races -
Lower
Lake
OTHER SCHEDULED
EVENTS
Saturday 2
10:30
AM
Yacht
Club
Races -
Upper
Lake
Friday 8
6:30
PM
Yacht
Club
Races -
Upper
Lake
Canceled
6:30
PM
"
"
"
Lower
Lake
Saturday 9 5:30 AM Mtka. Bass Classic - Spring Park
sUibd:iv 10 6:00 AM Am. Scholarship Foundation Bass Tournament
Wawatosa Island
Saturday 16 10::)0 AM Minnetonka Crossing
Sunday l i 11:00 AM Yacht Club Races - Lower Lake
Mound City Days - Cooks Bay
Fireworks at Dusk
•
`)/ 3O /;4u
IgaV*Z-
LAKE MINN ETON KA CON SERVAT IUN DISTRICT
473 -7033
RECD MAY 3 1 1990
MEETING SCHEDULE
June 1990
Wednesday 6 Public Hearing on Management flan, final review
1:00 pm - City of Minnetonka's Community Room
7:00 pm - City of Minnetonka's Community Room
14600 Minnetonka Boulevard
Saturday 9 Water Structures and Environmental Committee
7:15 any - Water Structures Committee (priority items only)
7:30 am - Lake Inspection, Water Structure and Lake
Use Committees
Monday 18 Lake Use Committee
7:00 pm - LMCD office, Wayzata depot
Wednesday 20 Advisory Committee, Management Plan
7:00 pm - Tonka Bay City Hall
Friday 22 Euras1 Water Milfoil Task Force
8:30 . Freshwater Foundation, Navare
Wednesday 27 LMCD Bo —. cf Directors' Regular Meeting
7:30 pri - Tonka Bay City Hall
5 -31 -90
•
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
•
May 30, 1990 RECD MAY 31 1990
TO: LMCD Municipality Mayors and City Administrators
RE: Lawn Sp - inkling Regulations
The continued drought has prompted some communities to establish
lawn sprinkling regulations. Responsible use of our water re-
sources is most commendable. Nour Lake Minnetonka Conservation
District agrees with such a policy.
Withdrawal of water from the lake appears to be a controversial
matter, with both proponents and opponents. Although some
agencies have established that residential withdrawal has a
minimal effect, the LMCD believes it is only fair and prudent
to subject shoreland residents to the same restrictions imposed
on groundwater users from city wells. Therefore, we request that
each Lake Minnetonka community include in its lawn sprinkling
regulation a requirement that lakeshore homes drawing water from
Lake Minnetonka be similarly required to conserve lake -water use
on the same schedule as other city water use.
In the event that your city has already implemented its 1990 lawn
sprinkling regulations, we respectfully request that it consider
an amendment to that ordinance to include water drawn from lakes.
We thank you for your cooperation and consideration on this lake
water conservation measure. We would welzome a copy of your lawn
sprinkling regulations upon inclusion of the lake water prov.sion.
Sincerely,
LAKE MINNTONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
David H. Cochran
Chair
•
18ay
BULLETIN
as$$ocia Rio of
metro o ita r
municipalities
Ue 44Y 3 1 1990
May 30, 1990
TO: Member City Officials
FROM: rry Bakken, President
RE: AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEES
HELP DETERMINE THE AMM'S LEGISLATIVE POLICIES FOR THE NEXT
BIENNIUM: We, as city officials, cannot afford to sit on the
sidelines and be silent. There are many critical issues facing our
cities now and we must let the Legislature know what we think are
the best solutions. We can do this by participating in the AMM's
Legislative Policy Development Process as a mi
AMM's Policy Committees.
The Committees will start meeting the week of
3rd. and will have a tctal of 4 or 5 meetings
by no later than September 15th. Please read
brief description of the five standing policy
ACTION NEEDED TO BECOME A MEMBER:
ember of one of the
July 30th. - August
each and will finish
'Attachment A' for a
committees.
1. If you were a member of a policy committee last year (1989)
and wish to continue as a member of that same committee, no
action on your part is needed. (You will automatically be
continued as a member.)
2. If you were not a policy conunittees member last year but want
to be a member, please fill out the attached form (on back of
Attachment A) and return to Carol Williams, AMM, 183
University Ave., East, St. Paul, MN. 55101.
3. If you were a Policy Committee member last year but would like
to change to a different committee, please call Roger Peterson
or Vern Peterson it 227 -4008 and indicate your new committee
choice.
THE BOARD WILL BE MAKING THE APPOINTMENTS IN LATE JUNE SO PLEASE
MAKE YOUR INTENTIONS KNOWN BY NO LATER THAN JUNE 21, 1990.
LAST CHANCE FOR RTB ADVISORY COMMITTEE:
Two earlier AMM Buletins (March 21 and April 10) requested that
interested City Officials (both elective and administrative)
volunteer to serve on this very important Advisory Committee which
is about to be established by Mike Ehrlichmann, RTB Chair. Mike
made a personal appeal at our May 16th. AMM Annual Meeting for
more volunteers and indicates that he places a very high priority
on establishing such a committee. Our office has received the
names of several officials but more volunteers are needed from
throughout the area especially from Dakota, Washington, and suburban
Hennepin Counties.
IF YOU OR SOMEONE FROM YOUR CITY WOULD LIKE TO BE A MEMBER OF THIS
COMMITTEE, PLEASE CONTACT EITHER ROGER PETERSON OR VERN PETERSON IN
THE AMM OFFICE WITHIN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS (227 - 4006).
DISTRIBUTION NOTE:
This Bulletin has been mailed to member Mayors, Councilmembers and
Managers /Administrators individually. We would appreciate it
if the City Manager or Administrator would duplicate and provide
copies of this bulletin to other city employees who might like to
serve on a policy committee.
Thank you.
0
•
) 804
• ATTACHMENT A
AMM LEGI:,LATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE DESCRIPTIONS
1. METROPOLITAN AGENCIES COMMITTEE
Considers legislative issues and other policy issues related
to the Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Agencies. The
Committee monitors the structure and relationship between the
regional entities and local units of government and reviews
amendments to Metropolitan Development Guide Policy Chapters or
any new chapters developed. The Committee has previously developed
policy on land use planning, metropolitan significance, solid waste
management, Met Council selection process, etc. It also reviews
the Council's yearly budget.
2. MUNICIPAL REVENUES COMMITTEE
Considers any matter concerning city revenues property taxes, and
city expenditures. Including state aid formulas, state aid
dollars, levy limits, property tax assessments, fiscal disparities,
etc. The Committee will be locking very carefully at the effects of
the 1990 omnibus tax bill as well as net tax capacity rates and the
• balance of aids /credits among regions of the state.
3. HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Considers all issues related to economic development and housing
including subsidized housing, affordable housing, and activities of
the Metropolitan HRA. Reviews all amendments to the Metropolitan
Council's Housing Guide Policy Chapter with particular emphasis on
low and moderate income housing concerns. Will review prorosals
dealing with EDA's, HRA's, Tax In= rement Financing ( TIF) and
Development authorities.
4. TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Considers all major issues related
transportation including funding sc
The ten (10) elected officials who
Transportation Advisory Board (TAB)
officials who represent the AMM on
(TAC) are encouraged to be members
other city officials.
to air and surface
urces at all governmental levels.
represent the AMM on the
and the eight 1 ) city staff
the Technical Advisory Committee
of this Committee along with
5. GENERAL LEGISLATION COMMITTEE
Considers other issues which have impact on metropolitan area
cities outside the scope of other AM:f committees. In the past,
• this Committee developed policy on municipal self insurance,
municipal consolidation, pensions, cable communications, PELRA
Amendments, Comparable Worth, etc.
/sa
•
POLICY COMMITTEE SIGN -UP FORM
(Please return by not later than June 21st.)
NAME CITY TITLE
CITY
PREFERRED MAILING ADDRESS
(street)
(city) (zip code)
PREFERRED TELEPHONE CONTACT NUMBER
PLEASE INDICATE COMMITTEE CHOICE
(1ST. AND 2ND.)
Municipal Revenues
Metropolitan Agencies
Housing and Economic Development
General Legislation .
Transportation
SUGGESTED ISSUES TO BE STUDIED
PLEASr. RETURN TO:
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
183 University Ave., East
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Att: Carol Williams
/999