1990-10-09 CC Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL PACKET - 10 -9 -90 #1
•
CITY OF MOUND
MOUND, MINNESOTA
A G E N D A
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
7 :30 P.M. TUESDAY, OCTOBER 9. 199
SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARDROOM
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
2. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 25, 1990
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. Pg. 2923 -2929
3. CASE #90 -934: DENNIS & SHELLY DORION, 5033
BARTLETT BLVD., LOTS 1,2 &
PART OF 3, BLOCK 5, SHIRLEY HILLS
UNIT B, PID #24- 117 -24 12 0023
REQ'jEST: VARIANCE: SIDE YARD SETBACK. Pg. 2930 -2945
4. CASE #90 -938: ROLAND R. GAVIN, 5000 ENCHANTED ROAD,
LOT 1, BLOCK 21, SHADYWOOD POINT,
PID #13- 117 -24 11 0069
REQUEST: VARIANCE FRONT & SIDE YARD SETBACK. Pg. 2946 -2956
•
5. REQUEST TO BE HEARD - MARY PACHOLME, 2624 WESTEDGE
BLVD. Pg. 2957 -2987
6. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT.
7. APPROVAL OF PAYMENT REQUEST - CITY HALL ADDITION
AND REMODELING PROJECT. (TO BE HANDED OUT AT
MEETING).
8. RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED & SUPPLEMENTAL
ASSESSMENTS UPON WAIVER OF FORMALITIES DIRECTING
PREPARATION OF ABSTRACT ; AND DIRECTING CERTIFICATION
TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR - LEVY #11840 - $1,500. Pg. 2988 -2989
9. RECOMMENDATIOIN FROM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
RE: COUNTY ROAD 15 BEAUTIFICATION PLAN. ,5. 2990 -2992
10. PAYMENT OF BILLS.
Pg. 2993 -3009
11. INFORMATIONINIBCELLANEOUS
A. Department Head Monthly Reports for September
1990. Pg. 3010 -3043
B. Planning Commission Minutes of 9- 24 -90. Pg. 3044 -3047
r
PAGE 2921
•
•
•
C. Petition that was circulated from residents
in the surrounding area of the Melvin Zuckman
residence, re: subdivision issue at 5012
Tuxedo Blvd. For ba:k.ground, this issue was
withdrawn from the City Council Agenda in
August after being denied at the Planning
Commission. As I understand it, the matter
is in litigation.
Pg. 3048 -3050
D. Letter dated September 27, 1990, from Mark
Saliterman, owner of Shoreline Plaza Shopping
Center, re: fence between Saliterman's
property and Hardees. Pg. 3051
E. LMCD mailings.
Pg. 3052 -3068
F. LMCD Representative's monthly report for
September 1990. (To be handed out at meeting).
G. Economic Development Commission Minutes of
September 20, 1990. Pg. 3069 -3070
Page 2922
September 25, 1990
146
is MINUTES — MOUND CITY COUNCIL — SEPTEMBER 25, 1990
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, men in
regular session on Tuesday, September 25, 1990, at 7:30 PM, in
the School District Board Meeting Room at 5600 Lynwood Boulevard.
Persons present: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea
Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jensen and Skip Johnson. Also
present were: Acting City Manager Fran Clark, Acting City Clerk
Linda Strong, City Attorney Jim Larson, Finance Director John
Norman, Street Superintendent Geno Hoff, Building Official Jon
Sutherland and the following interested citizens: Stan Drahos,
Bill McNamee, Don Gillmore, Gerry and Donna Smith, Sue
Carmichael, Lavon Cooper, Palmer Koosman, Daryl Tripler, Bill
Mulligan, Tom and Phyllis Helget, Shelley and Denis Dorion, Craig
Henderson, Lori Hamm, Parker Hodges and Lori Harty.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in
attendance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
1.0 PRESENTATION OF WESTONKA D 41.LBBS -JO MR &lB .3_._Tb_Q18A.3
H_L-GET, RECYCL-OTTO WINNER,
Mayor Smith introduced the Recyclotto winners and presented them
with 350 Westonka Dollars. The Helgets were the first winners
since the programs inception in August.
1.1 P 4 lLDF—CEBTIEI .CeS"F_BEEQ .Gb.ITI O N T O W E S T 0 N K A
MUSCULA$ DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATIO (MDA) CO MIT EE
Mayor Smith read the proposed certificate.
MOTION by Smith, seconded by Jensen and carried unanimously
to approve the Certificate of Recognition to the Westonka
MDA Committee.
Mayor Smith then presented the certificate to the MDA Committee
and tha %feed them for their effort.
1.2 MINUTES
MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens and carried unanimously
to approve the minutes of September 12, 1990 Regular Council
meeting and the September 18, 1990 Committee of the Whole
meeting.
1.3 PUBLIC HEARING: DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
0 Fran Clark, Acting City Manager, stated the revised amount was
$2698.02. Mayor Smith opened the public hearing asking if anyone
60 3
September 25, 1990
147
present wished to speak on this item. There was no one, the
Mayor closed the public hearing.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 090 -109 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT
UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2698.02,
AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT OFF
WATER SERVICE TO THOSE ACCOUNTS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING ON ASSESSMENTS:
1.4 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PARKING MAINTENANCE
The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one came forth. The
Mayor closed the public hearing.
Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -110 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1990 CBD PARKING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE
AMOUNT OF $12,569.90, TO BE CERTIFIED TO
THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8% INTEREST, LEVY
#11832 .
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.5 DELINQUENT MATER AND SEWER BILLS
The Mayor opened the public hearing. No one came forth. The
Mayor closed the public hearing. Acting City Manager Fran Clark
stated that this amount would be placed on the 1991 tax rolls and
be paid off within one year.
Ahrens moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -111 RESOLUTION ADOPTING DELINQUENT WATER &
SEWER ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF
$10,989.20, TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE
COUNTY AUDITOR AT 8% INTEREST, LEVY
#11833
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
The Mayor opened the public hearing asking if anyone present
wished to speak on this item. There was no one. The Mayor
closed the public hearing.
Jessen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
2"y 2
September 25, 1990
148
• RESOLUTION #90 -112 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE IMPROVEMENT OF A
PRIVATE PORTION OF DENBIGH ROAD THAT
RUNS EAST FROM CARDIFF ROAD. ASSESSMENT
ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY
The vote was unanimously in favor, motion carried.
1.7 UNPAID MOWING CHARGES
The Mayor opened the public hearing asking if anyone present
wished to speak on this item. There was no one. The mayor
closed the public hearing.
Ahrens moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -113 RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID MOVING
ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $335.00
TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT
8% INTEREST. LEVY #11837
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.8 UNPAID CLEAN UP CHARGES
. The Mayor opened the public hearing asking anyone present who
wished to speak on this item. There were none. The Mayor closed
the public hearing.
Johnson moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -114 RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNFAID CLEAN -UP
ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $350.00
TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT
8% INTEREST. LEVY 011838
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.9 UNPAID TREE REMOVAL CHARGES
The Mayor opened the public hearing and asked if there was anyone
present who wished to speak on this item. There were none. The
Mayor closed the public hearing.
Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 090 -115 RESOLUTION ADOPTING UNPAID TREE REMOVAL
ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $900.00
TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT
8% INTEREST. LEVY 011839
0 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
3 02 tot Ur
September 25, 1990
149
1.10 RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED A SUPPLFMCUT L ASS SSMENTS UPON
MMEE_OFQYBAL D IM MI G PREPARATION AB —SCI
AND DIRECTING CE$IIFIQ 1 Y AUnIIQ& --L
#118AS — 12000.
Acting City Manager Fran Clark explained that there had been only
one sewer main servicing two lots. The lots have been split and
each lot requires its own sewer service.
Johnson moved and Jensen moved the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -116 RESOLUTION
LEVYING
DEFERRED
&
SUPPLEMENTAL
ASSESSMENTS
UPON WAIVER
OF
FORMALITIES;
DIRECTING
PREPARATION
OF
ABSTRACT; A
DIRECTING CERTIFIC! - -1 "
TO
THE COUNTY
AUDITOR -
LEVY
LEVY 011836
$2000.
$2600.00
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.11 RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFT A SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS UPON
yAIVER OF
FORMAL ITT ES:— M EEIIIGPYEPA"IION OF MIBADU
NA D DIRE EIQAII01-1QIbE C.O.0 llLAUDITQR = —LM
#11816 — 12,600.
Acting City Manager Fran Clark explained that a single water
connection had been servicing two homes. Individual water
service is needed.
Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 090 -117 RESOLUTION
LEVYING
DEFERRED
&
SUPPLEMENTAL
ASSESSMENTS
UPON WAIVER
OF
FORMALITIES;
DIRECTING
PREPARATION
OF
ABSTRACT; &
DIRECTING CERTIFICATION
TO
THE COUNTY
AUDITOR -
LEVY 011836
-
$2600.00
The vote was unanimously in favor. `�otion carried.
There were none.
1 .12 DORCHESTER ROAD,
LO 19 A 20, BLOCK 17, AVALON, PID #19- 117 -21 11 0106.
REQUEST e _ (AJiIA�IEE;�IQEy,9B> EIEIEILTQ�LLQls[�Q�IEQBlII�IS
ADDITION
Building Official Jon Sutherland
thy applicant has applied for a
nonconforming side yard setback
of a conforming addition. Staff
A1.Z(
updated the Council stating that
variance to recognize an existing
of 5 feet to allow construction
and Planning Commission
L9
•
r \
LJ
•
September 25, 1990
150
40 recommends approval.
Johnson moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #90 -118 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING
COMMISSION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING
NONCONFORMING SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR LOTS
19 & 20, BLOCK 17, AVALON, PID 019 -227-
23 -31 0106 (4435 DORCHESTER ROAD) PZ
090 -932
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.13 SASE 110 ,90-914-- _nFNI.1 DORION. LOTS 1.2 g_PART QE
LQT 3 - ALQ S o S HIRLELHILLS,—IIHIL 16— PID024- 117 -24 12
0023- REQUEST• VARIANCE; SIDE YARD SETBACK
Building Official Jon Sutherland updated Council on this item.
He stated this is an odd shaped corner lot. Applicants want to
build a detached garage requiring in a 21.5 foot variance. Staff
recommendation was to deny the variance request based upon the
criteria for variances. This request is not at the minimum that
would alleviate the hardship. Other alternatives are available
for this garage, i.e., move it closer, attach to house, make it
smaller.
• MOTION by Johnson and seconded by Jensen to concur with the
Planning Commission to deny the variance request. The
notion and the second was withdrawn.
MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Jensen and carried
unanimously to table this item until the next meeting when
the applicant can return with an alternate design layout
including the specific measurements and new variance
request.
1.14 $ EQl 1E,SLEBQlL_PAL!!EB_1CQS1.Sll�B , 6 0 4 5 CHESTNUT R O A D , RE.-
BARRICADING UNIMPROVED SECTION OF SOUTHVIEW LANE,
Jim Larson, City Attorney, explained this item to Council. He
cited Mound Ordinance 1000.00, Subd. B. which states it is a
misdemeanor to obstruct a public rite -of -way. The request is to
barricade the unimproved section of Southview Lane. Discussion
followed including the following persons: Palmer Koosmann, Daryl
Tripler 6101 Lynwood Blvd., and Lavon Cooper.
MOTION by Jessen, seconded by Jensen and carried unanimously
to deny the request to barricade the unimproved section of
Southview Lane.
. 1.15 2A11IQSE_BQIR -111
yESIEQGE_BM ( COUNT,Y M D 44) .
A IN
September 25, 1990
151
There were no comments from Council. •
1.16 APPOINTMENT OF BOB POLSTON TO MOUND HRA
Smith moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 090 -119 RESOLUTION TO APPOINT BOB POLSTON TO THE
MOUND HOUSING A REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FOR A FIVE YEAR TERM - TO EXPIRE 8 -29 -95
The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried.
1.1T PAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION by Jessen and seconded by Jensen to authorize the
payment of bills as presented on the pre -list in the amount
of $345,260.94 when funds are available. A roll call vote
was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.18 OMNIBUS HEARING
Jim Larson, City Attorney, explained the possible change in rules
of the Criminal Procedure scheduled for implementation January 1,
1991. The rules have allowed the omnibus hearing to be waived .
and held at the time of the pretrial conference. Most cases are
resolved at the pretrial conference. This saves cities time and
money by appearing one less time for court. The amended rules
will eliminate the waiver. If there is to be an omnibus hearing
it must be held in 14 days, not combined with the pretrial
conference. The change in rules will cause a financial hardship
for cities.
Jessen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION 090 -120 RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A WAIVER OF
MINNESOTA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
AD ON ITEM 02
Mayor Smith referred to a letter from Wayzata referencing Orono
and the draft of the LMCD plan. There was discussion, no action
taken.
"E DIMATI &MISCEL-L-ANEOUS
A. Financial report for August 1990 as prepared by John
Norman, Finance Director. •
Ali? a 6
September 25, 1990
152
• B. Planning Commission minutes of 9- 10 -90.
C. Information from the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities (AMM). Please note annual membership
meeting scheduled for Thursday, November 1, 1990.
D. Park & Open Space Commission minutes of 9- 13 -90.
E. Comments from the City of Orono regarding the LMCD
Long -Range Management Plan.
MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Jensen and carried unanimously
to adjourn the meeting at 9 PM.
Francene Clark, Acting City Manager
Linda Strong, Acting City Clerk
•
0
7 44 tw'
AL
CITY of N1( t
"REVISED"
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of October 8, 1990
TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
FROM: Jon Sutherland, Building Official
CASE NO.: 90 -934
APPLICANT: Denis & Shelley Dorion
LOCATION: 5033 Bartlett Blvd.
LEGAL Lots 1. 2, b part of 3. Block 5. Shirley Hails
DESCRIPTION: Unit B, PIU ¢#24- 117 -24 -12 0023 •
SUBJECT: REVISED Side Yar1 Setback Variance
ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential
UPDATE
The applicant is back before the Planning Commission with a
revised proposal for locating the proposed detached garage as
directed by the City Council on September 25, 1990.
The revised location resk-Its in a variance request of 16 feet to
the required side yard setback of 30 feet.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommendation remains unchanged that the location as
revised still does not represent a minimum variance situation.
NOTE
This case will be heard by the City Council on October 9, 1990.
The abutting neighbors have been notified. .
�9.uW
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
October 8, 1990
Case No. 90 -934: Denis & Shelley Oorion, 5033 Bartlett Blvd
Lots 1. 2 3 Part of Lot 3. Block 5. Shirley Hills Unit 8. PiD
IL24- 117 -24 -12 0023. VARIANCE: SLOE YARD SETBACK
This case was referred back to the Planning Commission by the
City Council at their meeting on September 25, 1990. The Clty
Council advised the applicant to return with a revised plan,
since the proposed plan did not appear to be a "minimum" variance
request.
Building Official. Jon Sutherland, reviewed the revised request
for a 24' x 26' garage with a 14 foot front yard setback, result-
ing in a 16 foot variance. Staff recommended denial as the
revised proposal still does not represent a minimum variance
situation.
Smith and Weiland both agreed that the window on the northeast
side of the house is important to keep for reasons of light and
ventilation, it is the only window on that side of the house.
Welland also believes that the proposed garage will not Interfere
with vehicular vision. Mueller commented that the proposed
garage does not appear that It will be detrimental to the area
because of the size of the property. It was confirmed that there
Is 10 feet between the curb and the property line.
Thal questioned if a 24' x 26' garage Is "minimum."
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Weiland, to approve
the revised proposal as shown on the revised survey
dated 9/26/90. Motion carried 7 - 2 (those In favor
were: Clapsaddle, Mueller, Weiland, Meyer, Jensen,
Voss, and Smith; those opposed were: Thal and Michael).
Thal stated that he would have been in favor if the garage was
reduced to 24' x 24'. Michael stated that the revised proposal
Is not a minimum situation.
This case will be reviewed by the City Council on October 9,
1990.
The Commission requested staff to present discussion regarding
triangle and corner lot setbacks in the near future.
CERTIFIC OF SURV
Prepared for'. 9 09IA M RESID
, IwmYEO SEP 21 t90
DESCRIPTION
eel it Lot 30 except that part thereof described as followcl Commencing��
the Brost Masterly corner of Lot 30. thence Northeasterly along the
Northwesterly line of Said Lot to R thence Southeasterly parallel with
the Southwesterly line of said Lot 30 to the Easterly line of said
Lot 30. thence Southerly along the Easterly line of said lot to the
most Southerly corner of Lot 30; thence Northwesterly along the
Southwesterly line of said Lot 30 t point of beginning, Block S.
SHIRLEY HILLS. UNIT S. according to the recorded plat thereof on f.lt
and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles. in and for said =
Coenty.
Parcel 2c Lots 1 and 2. and Lot 3, except the Southwasttr.y 10 feet
thereof. Block S. SHIRLEY HILLS, UNIT B, according to the recorded plat /
thereof on file and of record in the office cf the Registrar of Titles
in and for said County.
Torrens Certificate No. 620959 j j. ♦^
0 i i •
AREA • 16,661 sq. 71. _ "�`
v FENCE DETAO
'� P ►•'rr�y Inc \
Off
\ I.i �' r Ttrtt eaneuhm•��
• \�
r `% \
*1 N
o'
Po•�sed 61:6 •rJw�c 9a
0 Denotes iron monument
'+ !'•� ^�e5 c�:ss �� se's.
N i#
PO
y�
O'
31
01 1 ql�
P•
s
`M c
s'
I X v .
3
ear
it
in
Z
O
2 S'
.?43J
r
\
N
�
.•10.00
�
7rt f -W
9 W660-
Itj�
f
GENERAL
NOTES
Ts
Proposed top of foundat;on elevation =
�•,
Procssed to-;P-61" $
01P ,1n I'— _
ear
it
in
Z
O
2 S'
.?43J
A
RECEIVED SEP 2 T 1990
CV
LA
L 1
0
MINUTES - MOUND CITT COUNCIL - SEPTENBEB 25t 1990
1.13
Building Official Jon Sutherland updated Council on this item.
He stated this is an odd shaped corner. lot. Applicants want to
build a detached garage requiring in a 21.5 foot variance. Staff
recommendation was to deny the variance request based upon the
criteria for variances. This request is not at the minimum that
would alleviate the hardship. Other alternatives are available
for this garage i.e., move it closer attach to house make it
mailer.
NOTION by Johnson and seconded by Jessen to concur with the
Planning Commission to deny the variance request. The
motion and the second was withdrawn.
NOTION by Jobosoa. seconded by Jessen and carried
unanimously to table this item until the .next meeting when
the applicant can return with an alternate design layout
Including the specific measurements and new variance
request.
•
•
t 4?73
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE w
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
September 10, 1990
d. Case No 90 -934• Dents a Shelley Dorton, Lots 1, 2, & part
of 3. Block 5, Shirley Hills Unit B, PiD #24- 117 -24 -12 0023.
VARIANCE: Side Yard Setback.
City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed the applicant's request to
construct a 26' x 28' detached garage on their property 8.5 feet
from the front property line facing Avon Drive. The Building Of-
ficial recommended to deny the variance request of 21.5 feet
based on the criteria for variances that the variance requested
be the minimum that would alleviate the hardship. Although there
appears to be a hardship, and the granting of a variance may be
warranted, it may be in the form of an attached garage.
Some Commissioners agreed that the garage size was too large to
warrant a minimum variance situation. The building envelope was
discussed. Mueller commented that the lot is an odd shaped cor-
ner lot which provic+es a hardship.
The applicants commented that they prefer a detached garage ver-
sus an attached. They prefer to have the garage placed 8 feet
from the house Instead of the required minimum of 5 feet to have
more room between the t ,,, structures. The reason they propose to
set the garage back, more towards Avon, is because of the place-
ment of the kitchen window.
MOTION made by voss, seconded by Michael to approve
staff recommendation for denial of the variance as
requested due to lack of hardship and it is not a mini-
mum variance situation. Motion carried 5 - 4 (Those In
favor were: Voss, Michael, Clapsaddle, Thal, and
Jenseni those opposed were: Meyer, Smith, Mueller, and
Weiland).
This case will be reviewed by the City Council on September 25,
1990.
0
Keay
r
11
CIT)" cif N1()l' \'I)
STAFF RECOMMENDA 7M
DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of September 10, 1990
TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
FROM: Jon Sutherland, Building Official
CASE NO.: 90 -934
APPLICANT: Denis & Shelley Dorion
LOCATION: 5033 Bartlett Blvd.
LEGAL Lots I, 2, a part of 3. Block 5, Shirley Hills
DESCRIPTION: Unit B, PID ##24- 117 -24 -12 0023
SUBJECT: Side Yard Setback Variance
ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential
BACKGROUND
This is an odd shaped corner lot, Bartlett is the `ront yard,
Avon is the side yard. The required setback on both streets is
30 feet. The southwest property line is the side yard with the
required setback being 10 feet.
The location as proposed by the applicants for the new detached
garage results in a side yard variance request of 21.5 feet.
It is the request of the applicants to build a detached garage in
eider to line up with the existing driveway and be able to retain
the existing side window in the house. This window provides a
desirable view, and light and ventilation for the home. In addi-
tion, the applicant stated a detached garage would allow easy
access to the rear yard.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommendation is to deny the variance request of 21.5 feet
to the side property line based on the criteria for variances
that the variance requested be the minimum that would alleviate
the hardship. A 1WW
Staff Recommen'•tion
Case No. 90 -934
Page 2
Although there appears to be a hardship and the granting of a
variance may be warranted, it may be in the form of an attached
garage slightly setback from the front line 'to provide for some
architectural relief, and therefore, providing a minimum variance
which would alleviate the hardship.
NOTE
This case will be heard by the City Council on September 25,
1990.
The abutting neighbors have been notified.
•
•
O13 (
CL- Cpl..• C L1 tt 1 �,
• CITY OF MOUNO
PART II
Cas
Date F i I ed - _
Fee -
VARIANCE APPLICATION
PLANNING a ZONING COMMISSION
(Please type or print the following information.)
Address of Subject Property
Lot
B l ock 5 c— hs.._ i.. , 14; ! �S
Addition PID No. Z�I'Ill �Z 0OZ
Owner's Name U ::� 5 S�1c�tt1 �(1 r , -
Owner's Address
Applicant's Name (if other than owner)__
Address
Day Phone `171- S 5 6 0'- 4'7>,' --6 9 17 3
Day Phone
Existing Use of Property:_ ( ' s t d pr%c Q
Zoning D i str i ct z - -
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, con itional use
permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? es n If yes,
list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolution • number(s)
0
o,.ies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.)
(C
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in
any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac-
curate. 1 consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this
application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose
of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may
be required by law.
Applicant's Signature - — Date-01, 4. oQ 3
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
P l a n n i n g Commission
Council Act i on - - - - -- - _- __. - - -- _ - - - -- - _ —. - -- - - - - - --
Resolution No . _ - -- - - - - -- -- - - -- - _- - - --
Date__
4137
VARIANCE APPLICATION
Case No._ qo - g3!%_ --�
1. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for
the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (✓f. No ( ). If no.
specify each non - conforming use:
2. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and
setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located?
Yes (X. No ( ). If no. specify each non - conforming use:
3. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent
its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning
district?
( ✓) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil
( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) sub - surface
( ) too shallow ( . shape ( ) other: specify
4. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone
having property Interests In the land after the zoning ordinance was
adopted? Yes ( ). No G4. If yes, explain
5. Was the hardship created by any other man -made ct►ange. such as the
relocation of a road? Yes ( ) . No ( V� If ves , exp I a i n____ _ - - _ -
i s
9,13%
• VARIANCE APPLICATION
Case No 80" 93
6. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance
peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (�
No ( ). If no. how many other properties are similarly affected?
�.7. What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area, bulk, and
setback regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of
your land? (Specify. using map ?. site plans with dimensions a_nd writ-
ten explanation. 1, free 06., `)Glf I .
From Uv \c.. -Vo ULrb � i�s 1 Q
y '_'-_,e_e. Suer U
8. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in
the same zone. or to the enforcement of this ordinance?
0 No
PART III
SITE PLAN INFORMATION: All supporting documents such as sketch plans,
attachments, etc., must be submitted in 8- 1l2 "x1l" size. If larger
drawings are submitted, one must be 8- 1/2 "xll ", and 15 larger size
copies must be provided. For each requested zoning variance procedure,
a site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity show-
ing the following information:
I. Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed: (Lot(s),
building(s), driveway s) /street access, off - street parking, and
utilities.
2. Existing and proposed elevations.
3. Distance between: building and front, side and rear lot lines:
principal building and accessory buildings; principal building
and principal buildings on adjacent lots.
4. Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc.
5. Indicate "north" compass direction.
6. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the
i s city staff and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance.
J?93T
ERTIF OF SURVEY
Prepared for : DORIA N R E SI DENCE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Parcel Ir Lot 30 except that part thereof described as follows: Commencing
at the soot Westerly corner of Lot 30; thence Northeasterly along the
Northwesterly line of said Lot % 14; thence Southeasterly parallel with
the Southwesterly line of said Lot 30 to the Easterly line of said �/
Lot 30. thence Southerly along the Easterly line of said lot to the ` a
most Southerly corner of Lot 30; thence Northwesterly along the
Southwesterly line of said Lot 30 to point of beginning, Block S.
SHIRLEY HILLS, UNIT B. according to the recorded plat thereof on file
and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles. in and for said
County. I
Parcel 2s Lots t and 2, and Lot 3, except the Southwesterly 10 feet
thereof, Block S. SHIRLEY HILLS, UNIT B. according to the recorded plat
thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles
In and for said County.
Torrens Certificate No. 620959
AREA = I6,551 sc. ►Y ,�° ^,.
It
I
s
SEND
Ar
•. � ts' zs'
w�
s �►�' ..�..; tv 3
FENCE DETAIL,:
2 I Z
• ��•f 9 �0 1 � It
Li ffn�c enaokffshf � '•� `' -' .,•
i
i
•
J
=y
w
A.
Su filer
3
1�
0 rntreech ;
y o
M 4 W1
� L.1 30 � _
o' GEN ERAL
N OTES `.,
i
i
•
ERTI OF SURV EY_
Prepared for' OORIR RESIDENCE
QESCEintoifl ' .
Parcel 11 Lot 30 except that part thereof described as follow*1 Coamencing
at the most westerly corner of Lot 301 thence Northeasterly along the
Northwesterly line of said Lot It fl; thence Southeasterly parallel with
the Southwesterly line of said Lot 30 to the Easterly line of said
Lot 30. thence Southerly along the Easterly line of said lot to the
most Southerly corner of Lot 301 thence Northwesterly along the
Southwesterly Ilse of said Lot 30 to point of beginning, Block Sr
SNIRLET NILLS, UNIT B. according to the recorded plat thereof on tilt
and of record In the attic* of the Registrar of Titles, in and for said '
County.
Parcel 21 Lots 1 and 2. and Lot 3, except the Southwesterly 10 feet
thereof. Block S. SHIRLEY HILLS, UNIT B, according to the recorded plat
thereof on tilt and of record In the office of the Registrar of Titles
In and for said County.
Torrens Certificate No. 620939 1. /
AREA a 15,641
GENERAL NOTES �.,.
E�' •E`1.
W
L1
3
Y
O
r.
7 ' j
OW
Th�S s 4
.% r Cl o w w e,
w Q wok i
< o S cA- v e .
�o c._ l o-} o -pr
o� drea����nc�
GT V\%'5
n
1
ium
- T h, s M ck b b e 41
C e a So c\ o b k , l d CL—
c�a � a �e
A -L r i v z
-�-•.
U
Q) Y
cra Zia
tj
•
IA? yy
0
•t
- f
NO/M/t
AV
..
.off ZO. t �•�
9p
� _ ��f..• 1 � - - _ _ � � 1 1 ��.�7_ _ _ _• a ��
+7 v ✓I /���•� ,may
01
v v i ,y t/� i 0 T. -b �s ' g •S j •f
- \ 0 f f •� Q f
1 A �t , 0
oS \ r o ,�� 1y in
_
d (c ° ��•' t6V i LO •r, o a
rl
• � �' � �' • �f'ii�•c"i � +qtr`. � • � �
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE •
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
September 24. 1990
Case No 90 -937: Roland R Gavin, 5000 Enchanted Road lot It
Block 21, Shadywood Point, PID #13- 117 -24 -II 0069. VARIANCE:
FRONT i SIDE YARD SETBACK.
The Commission recognized that the applicant, Mr. Gavin, was not
present. Commissioner Smith Informed the Commission that he
talked to the applicant's wife, and she stated Mr. Gavin was out
of town and may not return in -time for the meeting. She opted to
table the request.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Clapsaddle to table
the request until the Planning Commission Meeting of Oc-
tober 8, 1990, and have the City Council hear the
request on October 9, 1990. Motion carried unanimously.
•
•
0? 10/9
11
C;1TY o f N IOUN1) - -
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
DATE: Planning Commission ,Agenda of September 24,
TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff
FROM: Jon Sutherland, Building Official �? ,
CASE NO.: 90 -937
APPLICANT: Roland R. Gavin
LOCATION: 5000 Enchanted Road
LEGAL Lot 1, Block 21, Shadywood Point,
DESCRIPTION: PID #13 117 - - 0069
SUBJECT: Variance: Front a Side Yard Setback
ZONING: R -2 Single Family Residential
. BACKGROUND
The app l 1 cant i s seek i ng a var i ance of 7 feet to the requ i red 8
foot front yard setback, and a 1 foot variance to the required 4
foot side yard setback for a detached garage (note: Zoning Code
Section 23.407).
COMMENTS
The applicant is limited by a narrow lakeshore lot and also by
the existing topography. There Is a 9 foot boulevard between the
property line and the curb. The location of the proposed garage
would approximately line -up with the existing garage to the west
and would allow the applicant reasonable use of his property.
The Planning Commission may wish to review any Impact the
proposed garage, or its access, may have on the unimproved
platted right -of -way to Pebble Beach Commons. A portion of this
right -of -way is currently being maintained very nicely by the ap-
plicant.
ECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the 7 foot variance to the required
is 8 foot front yard setback and the I foot variance to the required
4 foot side yard setback to allow construction of a 22' x 22'
detached accessory building.
This case will be heard by the City CouncI on October 9, 1990.
The abutting neighbors have been notified. oft"
1
D
"-)3i z(v
CITY OF MOUND
PART I
cc I% q cr 1- 11 -10
Ca 1
Case No.
C
Date F i I ed__ 7 ) -- 1 U
Fee - 150.00 _
VARIANCE APPLICATION
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
(Please type or print the following information.)
Address of Subject Property 5000 N C,yI A �✓TE,Q aP OAl�
Lot ONF _ Block
G
Addition Sf-R t /I{� PID No. /3 :7/7' — /�- 00��
Owner's Name Rot A /Q �A ✓.' A.) _ Day Phone 4 7 Z " 3 O Z
Ownzr's Address SOQO ENCh/ oQD ,4D
Applicant's Name (if other than owner)
Address
Day Phone
Existing Use of Property: 7 Z -
Zoning District,'
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use
permit. or other zoning procedure for this property? yes /[Ko If yes,
list date (s) of application, action taken, and provide resoIut on number s)
(Coples of previous resolutions must accompany this application.)
1 certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in
any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac-
curate. I consent to the entry In or upon the premises described In this
application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose
of Inspecting. or of posting, ma ntaininq� and removing such notices as may
be required by law. //
Applicant's Signature Date 3 O
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
P l a n n i n g Commission
Council Action:__,
Resolution
Date_ _
;A V 9
W ARIANCE APPLICATION
Case No._ q0'
1. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for
the zoning district in which it i located? Yes ( No( ). If no,
specify each non - conforming use:
2. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and
setback regulations for the zoning district in which it Is located?
Yes fx). No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: _
3. Which unique
physical
characteristics of
the subject property prevent
its reasonable
use
for any
of the uses permitted in that zoning
district?
(x) too
narrow
(X)
topography
( ) s o i l
( ) too
small
( )
drainage
( > sub - surface
( ) too
shallow
( )
shape
( ) other: specify
4. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone
having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was
adopted? Yes ( ). No ("" . If yes, explain ,_
5. Was the hardship created by any other man -made change, such as the
relocation of a road? Yes ( ). No If yes, expl in
•
A4 f^1
VARIANCE APPLICATION
Case No. q0 -143
6. Are the conc.itions
of hardship for which
you request a variance
peculiar only to
the
property described in
this petition? Yes ( ) , ',,
No ( %. If no,
how
many other properties are similarly affected? T7�,—_
1 yo,n6 - A/Ex-r &oR
(.S408
jO h) AAS
Ai✓ 20S ZI.t. & 47 F 5
1�147 11As A Si/)�>
1.4A, OVCAI 1AAICE f�Pe•�i
���D .7/4F
7. What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area, bulk, and
setback regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of
your land? (Specify . u ing maps, site plans with dimensions and writ-
ten explanation. �'� �PEr �% S/AOS RD A.-v10 04 OIv&
_�60 �9eeT 1/A VAQiA•vcE . TN�S �s 1 �,(%s s/�.�" �
8.
Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in
the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance?
I
PART Ili
•
J. SITE PLAN INFORMATION: A11 supporting documents such as sketch plans,
attachments, etc., must be submitted In 8 -1/2 "x11" size. If larger
drawings are submitted, one must be 8 -112 "x11 ", and 15 larger size
copies must be provided. For each requested zoning variance procedure,
a site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity show-
ing the following information:
1. Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed: (Lot(s).
buflding(s), driveways) /street access, off - street parking, and
utilities.
2. Existing and proposed elevations.
3. Distance between: building and front, side and rear lot lines:
principal building and accessory buildings; principal building
and principal buildings on adjacent lots.
4. Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities. etc.
5. Indicate "north" coRnpass direction.
6. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the
city staff and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance. (a
;Ldl5 0
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
October 8, 1990
Case No. 90 -937: Roland R. Gavin. 5000 Enchanted Road, Lot I JL
Block 21, Shadvwood Point. PiD #13- 117 -24 -i1 0069 VARIANCE:
FRONT & SIDE YARD SET
Building Official, Jon Sutherland reviewed the proposed variance
request. Mr. Gavin is seeking a variance of 7 feet to the
required 8 foot front yard setback, and a 1 foot variance to the
required 4 foot side yard setback for a detached garage.
The Building Official explained that the applicant is limited by
a narrow lakeshore lot and also by topography. There is a 9 foot
boulevard between the property line and the curb. The location
of the garage would line -up with the neighbors garage. To allow
the owner reasonable use of his property, staff recommended ap-
proval of the 7 foot front yard setback variance and the 1 foot
side yard setback variance to allow construction of a 22' x 22'
detached accessory building.
The commission questioned the applicant why he needed four garage
stalls. The applicant stated that he hopes to convert the exist-
ing tuckunder garage into living space sometime in the future.
He explained that the existing garage takes in water due to the
topography.
Mr. Gavin explained that he explored many alternatives for the
location of the garage, and due to the topography and existing
trees, this appeared to be the most workable plan.
Clapsaddle commented that if the variance is approved, he would
like to see some type of natural barrier installed along the
south property line to force the applicant to use a straight ap-
proach off of Heron Lane, rather than a sharp curve off of En-
chanted Road.
Mueller and Weiland recognized that there will only be 3.3' be-
tween the neighbors existing garage and the proposed. They com-
mented that this is a fire hazard and makes maintenance dif-
ficult.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Voss to deny the
variance request due to lack of hardship, and the
proposed garage would be too close to the garage behind
it which creates and unsafe situation. Motion carried
unanimously.
This case wl11 be reviewed by the City Council on October 9,
1990.
VATEk f •,
ti
Pi
o
�r o
V �
`^ No fit'
o, o
a a�
F.
Qb '
C
% -I
MI
N
NO
1
MA
Plat of Survey
for Cory E. Johnson
of Lot 1, block 21, Shadywood Point
IiInnipin County, Minnesota
P . ,95L 6' B ,CACN
COMMON
1
CcrtifiChtn of :.e. ley:
I herAby cor . ' "y that this
is o tnu-i find correct r , --
nentation of a survey of thn
buun(:arigs of Lot 1, block 21,
ShnOyuuuc feint, mm; of the
loait'on of A11 builningm, if
nny, thir-mi, ana all vialblo
Qncrondhm•mts, if hny, from
or un said land.
S ouler 1" )0
Leto : lily 10 IIAJ i
p 1 Iron marKAr
7f,rriun R. Guffin No. 6064
�ury -yur i u. Nnnmr
Lone ivki, 14innoeota
PIS/
0
L4
Z "
V o
Q�
h
• ENCNAN�,ED
-L#ri'�
Ra�D
Plat of Survey
for Cory E. Johnson
of Lot 1, block 21, Shadywood Point
IiInnipin County, Minnesota
P . ,95L 6' B ,CACN
COMMON
1
CcrtifiChtn of :.e. ley:
I herAby cor . ' "y that this
is o tnu-i find correct r , --
nentation of a survey of thn
buun(:arigs of Lot 1, block 21,
ShnOyuuuc feint, mm; of the
loait'on of A11 builningm, if
nny, thir-mi, ana all vialblo
Qncrondhm•mts, if hny, from
or un said land.
S ouler 1" )0
Leto : lily 10 IIAJ i
p 1 Iron marKAr
7f,rriun R. Guffin No. 6064
�ury -yur i u. Nnnmr
Lone ivki, 14innoeota
PIS/
T
L Ael
E /pr. /ien 01'WOO(er jvr l"Cr
on / /• /P L9 a !t f. s s
:N
a
ti
M r NN [ rd OV V A
a�
` .t
e %
1� 1
41 ,5.1
cv/ omero.ers,,.' lro� 4/2
01 .4 , :4
Plat of Survey
for Gary E. Johnsen
in Block 21, Shadyvood Point
hannspin County, Minnesota
Certificate of Surveyt
I hereby certify that
this is a true and correct
representation of .a survey
of an area of excavation -
along the West lion of .Lot
1, Block 21, Chadpwrood
Voint, showing approximate
bamdary of the area, and
incicatinp a nunbsr of
spot sl�vntions in Lots
1 and 3 said Mock 21.
W
Q
J
h
•
0
Cordon R. Coffin
N. 6064
Land Su-voyor and Flenner
Long Leke, Minnesota
• r
101 sX
�cs]
Late :
o 1 :
Lttum:
1" - 201
11 -12-69
Iron mark -jr
Spot elevation
l••r.an sea lev91
•
rs6 -,Z ( rv� ' y Gp"-to
3,''r ,- n6S / a 3IV0S' 0
os -�
3tT velv
r V
•
g5P/1A�T
S N I A)
�- ICE R ,vE ,BLccks
C o AT
N
�--� o vEPtIAn,IC�-
GR14ot
•
Ms i
` R 0 ,U,,
L.4 o R L - ,A VIA) SOLID ENCh�AN��0 RD
�r z
,\ � ��/ .�tE iii► �_� :r
Z 4 Toeo —", ' _
I 2 S u
k
N ,z
1> t4
111
111
) oL I411V.0 GAV/,v 4
A?S,
7
4 3�
�s
x.�
1
a 18 2.
9.
10
10
9 r
o
� fNN / N G S _
1.1 14
,
A
'� • _mss:
0
�o
EL y'
y
4M Y7
ZONING
REQUIREMENTS
ADDRESS:
APPLICANT:
& aia ) 6
n
LOT: I
BLK: Z I
ADDN s �qu)wO
•
K-
A -
ZONE: Z
REQU I RED
LOT AREA s
EXISTING LOT AREA:
REQUIRED SETBACKS
O
FRONT: ,
l/
. AJR
G aft 1i
JF
W
S I OE s nQS�
SIDES
REAR: 15 feet ;
LAKESHORE: 50 feet
EXISTING 96 POSE_ftETBACKS q a(o ''" ► deim"d
FRONT: L O +0 e
SIDE:
q ours
SIDES o '
REAR:
LAKESHOREs _
DATE :__q_/_n /CL0 BY:
s
W. .4
AU u �7t 20, 1990
"ary Pacholke
262+ Westedge 1 31vd.
• Mound, "n. 55364
47- -3008
Mr. Paul Liemandt
Minnesota Department of Agriculture
Conoliance and Enforcelrent Section
90 .vest Plato Blvd.
St. Paul, Vn 55107
Re: Pesticide ?'isuse Investigation F'1
Dear Mr. Lierrandt;
This correspondence is in responce to yours of August 3, 1990.
I found the tone and intent of ycur letter to be quitb antagonistic
in yo>>r attempts to discredit my concerns of illness of people and
dogs and damage to wildlife following Metropolitan T'osouito
Control District( ?.�-SCD) pesticide application. I don't un'erstand
t his antagonistic attitude as it is my undnrsta. ^_ding that by
law pesticide investigation is the responsibility and duty of
you agency.
I have been referred to ?!n. Statute S 183.045 which states
that the "innesota Department of Agriculture develop a pesticide
managenent plan for the prevention, evaluation and mitigation of
occurences of pesticides or pesticide breakdown products in
groundwater and surface waters in the state. I have also been
referred to Mn. Stat. S 18B.07 subd. 2 which states:
a. A person may not use... a pesticide... in.a manner:
1. that is inconsitent with a label.... instructions...;
2. that endangr-rs hir:ans, damages...fish or wildlife; or
3. that will cause unreasonable adverse effects on the
environment.
b. A person may not direct a pesticide onto property beyond the
boundaries of the target site....
Xy initial complaint to your office of the "ay 4 pesticide
aoplic -;lion was made on Vay 11. The delay resulted in ray ignorance
as an uninformed citizen as to whom to ma.ke such a co�iplaint; the
M4 dirt not inform rip when T notified them of the problem on
?'ay 7. This w s 7 days after apilicat "on. 'Four staff did not
res-�onr'. to my complaint even after repeated calls on "ay 14, 15,
16, 23 and ultimately T w,,s told that it wol;ld be too late to
take water samples to investigate more than 10 days following appli-
cation � s the chemical "ethoprene wo no lonE er be present. ',�.ou,
youself, repeated this infornatirn on May 30 urhen you •:lso stated
that we were all in at*ree,ent that hltosid was the nro�?uct ased
on tt:A 1-,':e so th;t I 1?o•.ldn't nor�d to P r;t -,y puppy's feces ;a ^plus
annlyzed. _
• }: yc h- i tole t1h t the the is :l ,!o t })n i ., thy 7 -1
- more th. 1r) :::ys tft( an-)licatior., I co.ildn't unr3 •;t:ind
bec-tu:,e ry punpie-, ha, again teen noisonr,(! by the 1,%''(r 1Iatrr on
"ay 2 : , 24 days al"',r r a�)-)1 ication. I have ;i ^ce 1 :rr,rd frog~.
A ?57
researchers in the field that ''ethopr�- is an extremely unstable
chemical and in the presence of sunliFht and •micro- orgr.nisms in is
t he natural envi on ment is rapidly broi;en dov-n into more than
fifty other chen is :ls or breakdown nrcrlucts. The orir
cho7ic,al ?"ethonrPne is apa':rently extrer,ely diffic-:lt to detect
even in samples collected i^ireiiately after application. I have
also learned that apparently the identity, toxicity a.id
carcinogenicity of the breakdotim products is unknown. I havF
recieved no resn_ onse from yo office, the " or from Zoecon,
mazufactitrer of ethoorere or fro rPa::erous researchers and scientists
associated with the 1 " 'CD prcgrnm to inouiries abort these breaF--
do oro'.cts, anti. toxicit; In fact Dr. ?oFrrr ' oon at t' P
t� o -' "innesota directin- reserrch at tl.- peso , ,gees
',ose-rc' Institute has stated that ti infor rr t ;on is r.o-:-
existent.
WhPn the chemical was again an -died on July 3 ana the puppies
and I were again poisoned in -our own yard, I reported this to your
agency on July 5 so that you coul,l take w,�ter samples early enough
to' detect the original che-icpl. Why you chose to ,.gait until
July 19 to take samples when you, yourself had earlier stated that
the chemical would be indetectible after ?uly 13 is a mystery to
me. Also a mystery to me is why you wol;ld have taken samples
from the western shore of the like when the wind that day was out
o'' the north and the cher.icals which float on the surface of the
water wron1r= have been concentrated on the sotth shore. At any rate,
as you know and have stated, a negative r �,n It for "ethoorene
frog your samples ta',en 16 days after application or from! the
'�'CD samples taken 46 days after application certainly does not
inlicate whether or not the che--ical has been used on, near or
in Lake Langdon.
In your letter of August 3 1990 you hi-ve stated that on
analysis of water sannles collected 7- 1.9 - fro-1 the west shore
of Labe Langdon "no residues of anv of i.rese 7n,:trials were
detected'. I believe it pertinent to po out th =t your laboratory
did not test for breakdown pro�!icts of "et *oore.ne which is how
sore of us -night interpret the trr ;n "residues ". You tested only
for "ethoorene. Perhaps no resid were detected because no
detection w:s atte
. ng ne, ic-:1 tr :tT�nt for -:, I init, ally contacted
Poi:�on .'on s«e' inp -( ,dical trot -nt for illness fror a ch,
e ^ter in thc• r:i.r. The;; cc -:ct hol-) -ire. I h--(', so-Ifht, thr�
st - IrjCc: o: _)r, rJ 'll':Cn <; o ?a-, Pr'.ct; c'e i- June,
ref T (` ^9 . , tit-r v ;o7 (' .'or h-It- )ro fl— t h• i s• rf; c ed s'-.ortly
b fore :,1: h 2a _II . 51 t,h,,
)t n I c ,lt ;r r', her of rrt )ro) ), r,';s
o ' l:,o: "i . anc'. re .� _r i' ..r Ci n; to' -i c Si':oc'- t:;;. t
sOC1. ^t, F? ; j th EnSt'_ " ;':tl<.n b I'.r)t ',ii t.h t^' 'lOr qr'. j $ap1Dr.
Wilkens again on July 14 and July�19,1Q90- I was extrer)ely ill
and getting progressively worse over the week after atte-Tting •
to take water samples from Lake Langdon myself after you had
stated on the phone on July 11 that your agency wo).,ld not take
water samples. Dr. Wilkens recorded the syrpto•ns I was having but
M59
3
does not kno�,' hov to treat i)oisoninr, She gave ne some ointment
to treat the rash that had developed on ry arns after handlinr
the lal:� .rater but rioth ":f for the se - .re na':sea and
pain I ;as n..oericnc ^_g. I have be =n • to locate
a doctor specializing in chemical ooisoning or environmental illness.
The only help I found in dealing with chemical poisoning calrre
from Dr. 'Minter, ^ty veterinarian, who had instructed -re to treat
it with activated charcoal, in conjunction with vitamins, anti-
oxidants and free radical scav- ngers. The nuppies had r:sponded
very well and very o•.:ickly to initial e-iergency treatments with
relatively large doses of charcoal and seemed to be o of im
danger. I h :d w•.nted to :gait until they were well recovered fro-,
the poisoning before taling them into his office because Dr. Minter
is located in the uotolan .rea, the host poluted area in the city,
as I knew thrt the effects of toxic fumes of any sort add to the
deleterious effects of poisoning (?1ati :ral He ^lth for Dogs and Cats,
Dr. R. Pitcairn, 1982). I took the puppies in to see him on July 17
as they as well as myself had become ill after I atte^^ted to take
water samples on July 15. By then their fevers had abated and they
were asymptomatic except that they wouldn't eat, a syr^ptom not
measurable or even visible to the vet. I again took them in -:,hen
Sammy had developed lesions on his legs. I have treated the lesions
with clay packs so that they no longer irritate btt the remain
as black raised hairless patches.
Activated charcoal was a successful treatment. for the illnesses
suffered by myself and my nupoies. As Dr. I"eith Soloman of the
Canadian Cent -r of Toxicology has stated that a charcoal treatment
wol,ld have no effect on a bacterial or protozoal infection. ire
had srggestpd a viral infection to be causative which I found
curious as I am unaware of a virus which infects both humans and
dogs and vhtch is carriel in the air associated with the smell of
a chemical ester as well as in the water. I did ask Dr. Solomon to
send Me lit- rat'ire references re;-ardi ng such a phenomenon b
have recieved not!.' n:e .
Another strange ocint abo''t the si;Frrst:ion is that if indeed
charcoal co•ild nrovi�e s-ch prono'_,ncec and imme ^ia *.e rolief of
syrptoms of a virus, it sce ^s to me that it would be marKeted
for the treatment of colds and flu for which T undo -stand there
is nrc>� ntly no cure. In fact when T w to a health food store
to 'T,' :,ore charcoal, I w..s told that tr.ere had been a ri.in on it;
thp,v c- lildn't ;:een it in the store. I asr.e % -meat it „gas r^arrete
for - di «hhrea an(. cn -, the first and most orono symptoms
di sn1 : , ed by r:y n reel es of i .nF .)ci soned by Altosid.
d yc�';r �;, ^f.er s,•:mnl'_nc lhc done in a more tiTely and in-
t -ll i r,wit m,--,nr ( th- roslil is co h vr' bren nore m inin?fI.l.
I h'vr indeeC' sc otr'.( ^n5':'' "s to the extromely toxic con 'iti.on
of thc Thy' ) i dog :, -.ot 'r. — trn tm -ntr here for loo
strit'r or - nythinr else. Thy-' is n!' -- ilfoil t, , te?cnt i� imp
done here. i;e nenin Co>>nty Envi ron7ental jiealth Denart-ent also
coi;ld find no treatments bei" - dc ^,n or r.car Lake L anpdon other
than '7 treatments and it is their belief that the source of
the Cher -lc,l is fro:-,, moso:i tr control. In my conver,ations with
scientists who sit on the Scientific Peer Review Panel I have been
AV?
4
told that BTI is only used for special aunlications such as black
flies. Altosid containing "ethoprene is used for essentially
all mosonito control in the Yetropolitan area. We have no black
flies here, only nosauitoes. In addition, on July 23,1 I
visited the laboratories of Natural Resources Research Institute
in - )uluth currently involved with analytical :procedures of Altosid
and BTI research. I was handed a jar containing relatively pure
'ethoprene. A fe sniffs of the material cat.sed irritation of
e.reG, nose r -:d V and I in felt nat:seous , !ith a
healache. I f - It ill the rest of the day. Thire is no anestion
th ^t the cha -ical in the air ''ay 5 to )'a.y 8 and again .Tu1y 3 to
July b which makes me ill is `ethoprene.
The lake i- ter following helicontor treatments is so toxic
tha': it his turned my aluminum canoe black where the canoe has
remained in contact -ith ti-.e water overnight. The canoe nulled
up on the grass '.killed the grass where the lake water drained
from it. ''y skin in contact with the water in obtaining water
samn:es broke out in a rash and I became extre ill, an illness
that did not respond as usual to treat. ant and became
progressively more profound over four days to r point where I
did not feel I would survive. when I finally �ed that we
were being noisa:ed from the olatside by chemic -.. - emaining on
my stiin in spite of many and frequent washings, t I had trans-
ferrer. 'these chemicals to the puppies by pettin, I was able
to come up with a treatment. By packing my arms `e chemieLils
were drawn out and the nausea lifted immediately. 4;71,e
Dac':ed the p>>ppies in clay and washed thern off with Alai r weter .
they were able to eat for the first time in four days. I tried
washing the canoe with strong soap in a 50 aLaodaol solution, I
tried using paint thinner. The canoe remains toxic so thrt when
we tried to use it in safe -aters we becane rashy. It is in seeking
chemical informa` ion neeled to figure out how to detoxify my
ca -�_oe th�"t I have found that there is no information a.v7ilnble
abolat "ethoprene breal -lo n pro�iicts.
You have stated in yo.ir lr.ttrr of :.urust. 3 that I h,.vF
been nro��i�e' nertin-nt technical information that substantiates
the lo relative tonicity and hazards of '-'MCD utilized moso'iito
control products. You are mistaken. In fact I have requested
such information many times on the phone and in writing from
your officol, from "' -'CD, from Zoecon, manufacturer of '?ethoprene
and have as yet recieved nothing. I will again repeat my reouests
to you:
- I wc>>ld like information on "ethoprene and breakdown products
that would be encountered in the environment, toxicity data including
procedures •:nd controls and di of tests used in determining
toxicity; also data used to deter*iine Dersistence of breakdown.
products in the environment.
I would .like a copy of the plan developed for the prevention,
evaluation and mitigation of occurences of DPsticides or pesticide
breakdown products in ground water and surface waters in the state
of !Minnesota according to Vinnesota Statute S 18B.045. 0
I would like a list of complaints made related to Y,'
activities for the past five years.
24440
P1
I an )recir t a ti -ely rF-s,cnce to °)y requests.
When 7 as' <cd you wt rt the ' of AF!ricu.lt was doing
to determine the i:^pact of nesti cir:es • on the environment and h,-t
work is -.s being done with other state agencies and local gove -11-
r.:Pnts to protect public health and ti:r� environment from har -ful
exposure to pesticides- duties of your dpp:;rt,ient as stated in
Minnesota Statute S 1M OLL - your rFsnonse was that nothing wa.7
being done.
The conclusion I must reach is that the C) is o
without any kind of monitoring or control, that they are account -
able to no one, that there are no provisions for investigating
wildlife losses and poisonings. The facts that:
1. a chenical is being introduced into the environment extensively
throughout the 7- co metro area in unknown concentrations
2. that che^:ical is nearly impossible to detect much less to
determine concentrations
3. the breakdown products, toxicity, carcinogenicity and persis-
t ence in the environment are totally unknown
4. that chemically sensitive citizens are told that they have to
prove chemically that there is a problem
5. numerous reports of wildlife losses and toxicity are ignored
6. the director of the 'T "CD has several conflicts of interest
all indicate a serious Problem and deficiency in the system
In view of the °act that "innesota law has mandated that
pesticide management be performed by the "innesota Denartment of
Agriculture and that work be done eith other agencies to protect
plablic health and the environment from harmful exposure to
pesticides, it seems imperative that your agency come un with
a plan to monitor and control the activities of the `T CD and
realistically assess damages and health effects. I wo be
happy to work with your office in accomplishing these goals.
I have enclosed signed statements from the other dog ovrne:'s
stating that their dogs were indeed ill this spring. Evidently
You misunderstood all these parties. In my report I described the
symptoms experienced by these and my dogs which appeared in all at
about the sane time. These symptoms are consistent with poisoning,
but the assertion that they were due to pesticide noisoning is
yours, not mine. Also enclosed is a signed statement from the neigh-
bor who heard the helicootor doing treatment.
You have mistakenly stated that on -site inspections have been
done here. Other than water samples collected too late to determine
anything, no one has been here to inspect anything, nor to �y
knowledge has there been an inspection or analysis of materials used
by the MMCD for aerial applications.
Yours truly, i
Dqco o A
�' &" - S 0
•
to
d
0
ss�a oe(
ar e tea,
;l
4ft/
i
rNo S�
X "I �,q / 1 . 9 90
✓' N' C IoS e 7- o
3 4,,,� a� c� S� A«s
we e-ou
h e #' 4 bo,- 4o,. �P
9
A7 o u e (� /LI �, SS 3 L Y
02 14at
REPORT OF POISONING BY METHOPRENE IN
ALTOSIU FOR MOSQUITO CONTRCIL BY THE
METROPOLITAN MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT
On Friday May 4, I was out working in my garden area midday when
I heard the roar of a helicopter flying over a swamp about 1/2
mile north of my home at 2624 Westedge Blvd. on Lake Langdon in
Mound, MN. The helicopter made numerous flights over the swamp
and I noticed it had a spray bar.
The next day on Saturday May 5, I tried again to work in my
garden but was becoming nauseated and developed a headache. I
noticed a very strong chemical odor in the air and recognized it
from my days as an organic chemist as the distinctly sweet smell
of an ester. I then realized that the wind had shifted and was
coming from the north and that the smell was coming from the
swamp area "treated" the day before.
(YU`4
It was a warm sunny spring day and determined to do some of the
out door work I had to do, I moved to the back end of my lot to
work near the lake. The chemical fumes were still present but
40 not nearly as strong, the wind blowing over the edge of the lake
instead of the swamp.
My two 5 month old puppies played in the yard near where I was
working, Sammy going wading in the lake periodically to cool off,
each time lapping a little at the water. He had been doing this
for almost a month without problems. He went in the water three
or four times as I worked. Sophie only got her feet wet and may
also have licked at the water but I didn't see this. Because of
the chemical fumes, I took the puppies and spent the afternoon at
my church in Orono working that garden while the puppies played
nearbyo•y S.cr.lti�.
On Monday morning I called the Metropolitan Mosquito Control
District to express my displeasure at having been made sick and
having been driven from my home because of the chemical fumes. I
learned that the 2 products used by them were Bacillus Thuringi
Israelensis, a bacterial biological ontrol and Altosid, an
insect growth regulator which they claimed was also a non -
chemical biological control. Both products were stated to be
odorless and completely nun- tox"2.
Monday afternoon, I was cleaning up puppy excrement when I
noticed not only yellow soft stool but a completely liquid yel1
dropping. By evening Sammy was obviously ill, he could not ki-ep
� up with us on our walk and wouldn't eat diner. Both puppies had
started to eat grass over the weekend and Sammy would eat it so
much and so intently that he would then throw it up.
(1) oil"
Monday night nobody got any sleep as Sammy kept mo%,,ig around
trying to get comfortable, an apparently impo - ;ible task and he
was regurgitating frequently. 0
On Tuesday morning Sammy was very sick, his stomach so upset it
was audibly gurgling. I again called the Mosquito Control
District to get more information on the two supposedly non -toxic
products. I obtained phone numbers for the companies that make
the products along with insistences that no way could ither one
make my guppy sick. I was particularly frightened as the
symptoms mammy was showing were the same symptr— "hadow, my
canine companion of 14 years had started t o xactly one
year previously. Shadow's health had deteri(ra;c relatively
slowly compared with Sammy and yet she had bee. _ead 3 weeks
from the start -�,f the symptoms.
I learned the most from a representative of the company that
makes the bacterial product BTI. She looked up Altosid and
informed me that the product is indeed a chemical, a liquid
deposited on a sand carrier. She sent me the descriptions of
both products copied from the Pesticide Dictionary from the Farm
Chemical Handbook, which arrived by special overnight mail.
1 called the makers of Altosid and learned again that the product
is a liquid chemical. I got the chemical nomenclature and found
that not only was this a chemical but it was indeed an ester
which is what I smelled coming in the air from the swamp on
Saturday and Sunday, May 5 and 6.
My dog Shadow had died the previous year fro- poisoning from a
unknown source. After two incorrect diagnoses from a standard
veterinarian. I finally learned what to do for chemical
poisoning from the Uptown Veterinarian, a h,-'.istic practice, but
it was too late to save tier. I already had the detoxifying
products in the house so I could immediately treat Sammy Witt.
activated charcoal and herbal blood clearers and liver support.
The response was quite positive, energy and appetite improving by
evening, the stool gradually firming and darkening over the week,
although for over 2 weeks he has c - )ntinued to eat much grass and
to vomit 2 - 3 times a da..
Sophie lost energy and refused to eat by Thursday at which time I
also treated her for poisoning. Friday I was feeling sick and
realized that 1 hadn't been eating. 1 was ourping and could
smell and taste the sweetness of the ester on my breath. I
treated myself for poisoning and was very sick all weekend with
naust-a. diarrhea that burned, weakness, and loss of energy.
I Jon "t know if this product Altosid is being misapplied as was
suggested by the representative of thF_ company that makes it ur
whether it Has, toxicity problems, as yet unrealized. I wa:
informed by twr_i repress!nt.ative of the Metropolitan Mosquito
Control District, Ross (.iI'erfl and Dr. Robert :`chulVr -n that the
chemical would b present in parts per billion.
My puppies ingested, breathed in and exposed via the skin so much
that the smell of the ester is still very strong in stools more
than a week later. I have kept representative stools from Monday
May 7, when I first realized there was a problem and I "m seeking
a means of obtaining laboratory analysis to prove to the doubters
that it is the chemical methoprene of product Altosid, which
poisoned Sammy. Sammy's urine from the first four or five days
after poisoning was so toxic that it killed patches of grass in
my lawn.
The toxicity problem in the lake is as yet an on going problem.
A representative of the company that makes Altosid has stated
that the chemical would be floating on the surface of the water,
that it would evaporate from there and that the rate of
evaporation would be dependent on the weather, that in hot sunny
weather it could take 7 -10 days to dispense into the air. We
have had cool cloudy weather for two weeks so the lake surface
remains in toxic condition.
One week after "treatment" of the swamp 2 adult geese and eight
goslings were seen walking away from the swamp area, up Westedge
Blvd. toward a small pond. Of the approximately two dozen pairs
of ducks, mostly wood ducks, seen on the ..ice a few weeks Prior
to "treatment", only two chickless pairs of mallards and a single
wood duck with a single duckling has been seen. "Treatment" with
this chemical was done at nesting time. Adult waterfowl forced
to remain in the toxic area to tend their nests, eggs in the
nests directly exposed to the chemical on the ground and in the
air. Specifications on this chemical state that it is 60%
volatile. Specifications also make the statement that it is
relatively non - persistent. Other specifications state that the
chemical is stable in storage for 48 months at 30 degree C.
I have dated stool samples of my puppies containing significantly
large amounts of Methoprene. I have stool samples of surviving
ducks containing Methoprene. I have a dead dog buried in my back
yard which likely contains Methoprene.
I have had to treat the puppies and myself once or twice a week
with activated ciarcoal as symptoms of poisoning continue to
recur periodically.
Altosid, as it is being used by the Metropolitan Mosquito Control
District is toxic and dangerous. Please help me in my search to
try to stop this poisoning of our environment, at least until
this gran be investigated. I believ that a search of the
"treated" swamp area would reveal urnatched duck eggs and
probably dead ducks.
I]
(3)
arcs
Cr. about May 22 a wood duck with a single duckling
were seen near the shoreline. A neighbor has reported seeing
Mallards with ducklings. On May 27 a canoe ride revealed
no ducks or wic"lin cup ;.a 1j.} e. U—rE In "normal" years
the many families of ducks and geese cruise the shoreline
sunning tl7enselves on the docks, there re now no ducks,
no ducklings, no geese, no goslings. other dogs living
on the lake also experienced symptoms of poisoning, severe
diahhrea and a very b ad odor. These syrptorms w.: re reported
to have occarreO about one week after "treatment of the swamp.
If I can be of any help, pleasr- contact ne.
N, ary Pacho2 k e
2624 Westedge Blvd
Mound, Mn. 55364
472 -3008
•
A96L
•
June 6, 1990
ADDENDUM TO REPORT OF POISONING BY
METHOPRENE IN ALTOSID
On May 25 I requested the MMCD on the phone and in writing to
test the water of Lake Langdon for Methoprene following their
"treatment" of May 4. They declined to do so stating that "in
our opinion the water i!t. perfectly safe." They also stated that
"we don't test water." I was referred to the PCA and EPA for
water testing. These agencies in turn referred me back to the
MMCD and the Department of Agriculture licensing bureau which as
I have been told by numerous sources is the agency which
investigates such complaints and problems. A representative of
that agency, Alice Waller had already on May 23 told me that
they would not investigate or test the water.
On Monday, May 28 my puppies got away from me and went into the
water. Although I immediately got them out of the water, by
Tuesdsy evening May 29 Sammy again had diarrhea and was vomiting
all night.
I have repeatedly tried to get the
investigate the situation. I first
puppies on May 11. I was told that
of two individuals, Alice Waller or
neither one would be available that
the rest of the day.
Department of Agriculture to
reported the poising of the
I would have to talk to one
Heide Fischer, but that
day as they were tied up foi
On i!ay 14 following the weekend I called again to speak to the
individuals. Heide Fischer was "not taking calls" so I spoke
with Alice Waller and again reported the poisoning. She told me
that she couldn't tell me anything or talk to me until she talked
to "someone else." I called her again on May 15 and May 16 and
was told the same thing as well as the fact that she was busy.
She then stated that she would see that something was done and
would get back to me. I did not hear from her and on May 23,
when I again talked to her on the phone she stated that it was
now too late to take water samples or to investigate. When I was
angry, she informed me that I could talk to her supervisor,
Heide Fischer. Heide Fischer is near impossible to get on the
phone. She is "on the phone ", "away from her desk" or "out cif
the office." I did reach her on May 24, told her the situation
about the poisoning and about being put off for river a week and a
half. She said she would look into it and call me back. I never
heard from her and I could never get throul,Ih to her.
r
( 1 )
2U�
On May 25 I tried calling Paul LeMont, who I learned from another
source was head of the department. He was already gone for an
extended Memorial Day weekend, so I left messages and sent him a
copy of a letter written to Heide Fischer on May 25, again
requesting investigation of the lake.
After the long weekend I again called and left messages for Paul
LeMont. He returned my call on Wednesday, May 30. He stated
that it was too late to take water samples. I told him that I
disagreed. A representative of the company that makes Methoprene
had said that the material would be present on the surface of the
water and would evaporate in 7 -10 d, of hot sunny weather which
we still had not had. l told him thy' on Monday, May 28 the
puppies had gotten away from me and had gone into the lake
water and again became ill.
On May 30, Paul Lemont stated that the situation was being
investigated by having "treatment" records by the MMCD sent for.
There evidently were the same records that Alice Weller had
already sent for when I spoke to her on May 23, which she had
stated that. "treatment" had been with HTI not the chemical
product Alt.osid.
Paul LeMont further stated that "we are all in agreement tha'.
Altosi.d was used on Lake Langdon.
To my knowledge no one ever has taken any water samples to
determine .'tat or how much chemical was used here. I was told by i s
Alice Waller on May 23 that water samples taken by anyone else
but them would not count and that they would not take water
samples. When I told Paul LeMout on May 30 that I have lots of
puppy feces containing the chemical, including samples submitted
to my veterinarian after the poisoning, his response vas that :
could have "spiked" those feces. I invited him as 1 d invited
Alice Waller on May 23 to come out to my hoi lest their
own stool samples as Sammy goes regularly M
I myself collected water samples from th gi n. the swamp on
May 31. Mayor Steve Smith of Mound collar., i wat. samples frO2
the lake and swamp can Jun- 1 and is holding .•�m
The swamp water i primarily in thr. shade of the bullrushes, is
quite cool and h an oily chemical film on the surface. The
lake surface water which is now quite warm and is exposers to the
sun, lt-ys matcritt float>ng on the surface but looks more like
flecks of solid in: - :tead of filmy liquid. I had been told that
M <-thopten would ' Lr down" in the IJV l ight, of the sun .
Drawin *, ar;ain tram my background (M.S./Unlver2ity of
Ari.,orr_t1 the 'hreakd pr is mo-,t likely the rycld of
the e_ why lr �h an in::,oiuhlt� s which would float f,rl
thy' �;!IC't;1 �Ilt wii�l;} ri1t �'VbE� at ±11 .
•
MC01
This acid form is also likely to be the first metabolic
breakdown product in the liver and may well be the substance
which is toxic to the puppies and myself, explaining the
delay in onset of symptoms of poisoning frc: he tim of
exposure.
The possibility exists that the lake surface is now in toxic
condition and will remain so for an indefinite period of
time. A water test of the lake surface indicating no
methoprene present would not indicate safety as the
"breakdown" products for which there is no test could be
causino the tcxicity. At any .ate, there is no\ agency
willing to tejt the water for anything.
•
This lake is considered a recreational lake by those who live
on it. Children Flay and swim in it. There was no
notification to the residents of "treatment" by the MMCD much
less notification of possible residual toxicity.
A fifth dog on the lake, an older dog has been experiencing
symptoms since "treatment" has not eaten in weeks. has lost
at least 15 of 100 pounds'and likely will not make it. On
May 30 a clay colored sparrow floundered he?; in my
yard, too weak to take flight and obviously ::•y sick to my
neighb ^r and myself who witnessed it. Earn llows, which
have nested on my porch for the last four y :._ and were
nesting again this spring disappeared shor_:; st'ter
"treatment" of the swamp. On June 6, I fc.n a dead Cedar
Waxwing in my yard. The rest of the flock, 'Pst seen on June
1 have not been seen since.
I have taken a petition around the lake and have found t hat
the vast majority (90%4) of residents feel as I feel, that the
loss of wild life and the potential toxicity of the lake is
too high a price to pay for mosquito control. The MMCD has
me over the phone that they will no longer use Altosid
lake and will use only STI, but they will not respond
- guests, including a w. tten request of May to put
assurance in writing.
It is very frightening that there is no ad-pii to control over
what is being done by the MMCD, that there is not adequate
information given to the public over what i_, being? done :grid
that there is no agency, governmental, or otherwise that.
citicons concerned by adverse effects and , n going tuxicit.y
problems can go. There is apparently no legislation,
mandating investigation of reported poisorli;. =,— in fact nu
responsive agr-n,y to which ' , V rapo t thosr
(3;
A161
Page 1
ADDENDUM #2 THIRD AND FOURTH POISONING ON LAKE LANGDON
FOLLOWING "TREATMENT" OF SWAMP BY MMCD
On July 3, 1990 the temperature went up to 100 degree, It
was so hot that I stayed indoors with my air coneitioner and
stereo on. I had on May 31st., installed a $1400.00 fencing
system on my property to keep my water loving puppies out of
the toxic lake, so I was able to let them out free to do
their business and play. They did not stay out long which I
figured was due to the heat. When I went outside to go to
work at 12:30 PM, I was alarmed to smell a strong odor of the
ester which had poisoned them on May 5th and again on Mny
28th. I thought the odor must be coming from the usual
source and was looking for the stool on the ground which
could contain so much of the chemical to smell so strongly.
As I walked around in the yard I realized the odor was all
over in the air. Walking toward the swamp I realized that
the odor was coming from the swamp. I had not seen or heard
the helicopter as I had been indoors all morning. On asking
neighbor Molly Beilharz "s mother, she stated she had been
sitting on their screen porch, had heard the,helicopter and
had smelled the sweet odor just after that. She had heard
helicopters on July 2nd and July 3rd. The next day was July
4th, a holiday, the wind had shifted from the north, cooling
the weather but causing the fumes from the swamp to blow down
Westedge Blvd. and into my yard once again. To be outside
made me instantly nauseated, with headache, re throat,
burning sinuses, abdominal cramps, and dizziness.
When I let my puppies out in the morning on July 4th, I had
not gone out with them, but went out a few minutes later. I
found them licking at a spot on the ground, I chased them
off, finding traces of a brown semisolid material remaining.
I got a stick, picked up some and smelled it. It smelled
very sweet, the same sweet smell emanating from the swamp.
Evidently an animal poisoned by the substance in the swamp
had diarrhea in my yard, once again poisoning my puppies for
the third time in two months by ingestion in addition to
inhalation.
The puppies and I were :onfined t:) the souse. In the
afternoon we left the area trying to find a place to walk
where the puppies could run freely, b-it the mosquitos were so
bad we were miserable and didn't stay out long.
After our walk, we were again confined to the house and I
realized that even in the completely closed up house I was
extremely uncomfortable with sore throat, painful sinuses,
nausea and headache. A friend invi'_ed me to a late lunch to
get away, but I couldn't eat so we went to a movie instead,
leaving the puppies in the house for the rest of the after- •
noon and evening. I felt bad about leaving the puppies in
that toxic environment but with out prior notice I had no
idea where I could take.them.
X9'10
Page 2
By the next day, July 5th both puppies were feverish. By
that evening Sophie would not eat and Sammy had yellow
diarrhea. I treated them with activated charcoal with no
change the next morning. I treated them again with a larger
dose. By evening, July 6th, Sophie was able to eat again,
but her energy level was low. Sammy "s diarrhea persisted but
his energy and appetite was good.
On July 5th I also took charcoal for the symptoms of ringing
ears, sore throat, severe intermittent abdominal pains and
nausea. These symptoms subsided and in addition I was able
to sleep for the first time since July 2nd.
On July 5th I called both the Minnesota Department of
AgriculturA (MDA) and spoke with Paul Liemont and the
Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (MMCD) to make a
timely complaint in order to get the situation investigated.
Again the MMCD denied having applied a chemical agent, in
fact denied having been to the swamp, and again the MDA
refused to investigate. Calls to the DNR, Hennepin County
Health Department, PCA confirmed that no one but the MMCD
would be treating the swamp on Lake Langdon.
On July 8th during a visit with Craig and Mary Coleman who
livqq,,,,,,�gq�n the south shore of Lake Langdon, I learned that their
dog' become ill after the first May 4th "treatment" had
dietl after a mon;:h of illness and being unable to eat. The
dog in its final days had the bloated abdominal area, typical
of the human condition "ascites" which accompanies liver
failure due to chronic alcohol toxicity. X -rays had shown
tumor development in the liver before death.
I also noticed on that visit the odor of the ester apparently
blowing in on the north wind from the surface of the lake, so
the following day I took water samples from that shore of the
lake.
On July 11th Paul Liemont of the MDA again refused to take
water samples or to investigate the toxic condition of the
air and water of Lake Langdon. My puppies and I were almost
consistently ill, Sophie being the most ill and unable to
eat. Because neither the MMCD nor MDA would take water
samples, I took samples from the swamp on July 5th, July 9th,
and July 15th, each time I handled the water I became
increasingly ill on the following day. On July 15th I took a
very large lake sample, 4 gallons, which I immediately
extracted with hexane with the purpose of having it analyzed
for breakdown products which seemed to be more toxic than the
original chemical. The following day I not only was nauseous
but my arms from wrist to elbow that had been exposed to the
lake water broke out in a rash. The puppies had become
feverish by Sunday night and neither would eat on Monday. As
the week progressed we all became more ill in spite of fairly
large does of activated charcoal we were all taking daily.
Sophie would not eat, I could not eat or sleep, my ears were
ringing my head ached, I had frequent severe abdominal pains and nausea.
Sammy had diarrhea.
M 1 i
Page 3
By Thursday July 19th I felt so profoundly ill that I went to
see Dr. Wilkens for the second time that week. The mystery
of how we could all be so ill such that the charcoal didn't
help was solved by a casual conversation that evening with
another dog owner who suggested I had petted the puppies or
let them lick me before I had washed off the chemical. It
only then occurred to me that in spite of frequent wash'.ngs
with regular and naptho soap that the chemical was still
present on my rashy hands and arms and that we were being
poisoned continuously from the outside. The following day I
obtained some bentonite clay, packed my rashy arms and hands
in it. The nausea and other symptoms abated within minutes.
I packed the puppies coats with the clay and a �pI.f hour
after rinsing it out we were all able to eat. I had found
out the hard way that you do not have to drink.the water to
be poisoned by it.
The canoe I had used to take lake samples, I had pulled up on
shore. That part of t he aluminum canoe which had remained
in the lake before being pulled onto the grass turned black.
The grass underneath that end of the canoe died. Previously
the canoe had been upside down on the dried up lake bottom as
the lake rose, one side of the canoe had been slightly
underwater. That gunwale had turned black. The rash on my
arms was the worst where I had leaned on that gunwale which
had turned black while taking the water samples. Subsequent
attempts to use the canoe in safe water in the Superior
National Forest has left my wrists rashy where I lean on the
gunwales and the puppies got rashy by standing on the bottom
of the canoe and then scratching (ear, nose).
Sammy "s tummy got rashy from lying on the bottom of this
canoe. The canoe remains blackened and in a toxic condition
in spite of thorough washing with a water /isopropanol
solution with strong soap, rinsing with water, washing with
paint thinner and again rinsing with water. In spite of
spending several weekends camping up north away from the
toxic environment at home (July 21 -23, July 27 -30) we remain
so sensitive that we becoie ill and unable to eat when the
wind is out of the north, off the swamp or out of the east,
off the lake or when the atmospheric pressure drops
increasing the rate of evaporation or when the humidity is h1gh.
After the May 4th initial treatment all of the ducks, mostly
woodducks that were nesting in that swamp area "disappeared ".
A single woodduck with a single duckling was seen for three
days before they, too, disappeared by May 27th. On May 30th
a clay colored sparrow wa: found floundering in the yard, too
weak `o fly. On June 6th a cedar waxwing was found dead in
my yard.
Two pair of wood ducks had successfully nested in a small
area in the southeast corner of the lake, one with a family
of five ducklings one with a family of fourteen younger
ducklings. It was not until June 15th that these two
; L 9 , k
Page 4
families started frequenting the west shore of the lake after
which they came frequently to sit on our docks. On July 4th,
the day following the second 'treatment' the family of
fifteen swam by looking confused and swam by without
stopping. Neither family was seen again until the end of
July when the older family of six have been seen almost
daily. A younger woodduck family consisting of only five
ducklings was seen July 31st but have not been seen since
then.
After the May 4th "treatment" of the swamp, barn swallows
nesting on my outdoor lamp abandoned the neat and "dis-
°ppeared ". They reappeared about mid July and again.began
nesting. No young have been seen and although the adults
remain in the area, they no longer sit on the nest. There
were no eggs in the nest on August 4th" These swallows which
have always perched outside my window chattering c - ke no
sound." The woods adjacent to the swamp area in question are
in dead silence, no sounds of any living thing. That silence
was profound on May 28th and again on August 6th.
'no young birds have been seen in the neighborhood except robins.
Crdinartly there are also swallows sparrows wrens, doves, cardinals
orioles, catbirds, waxwings, jays, etc.
iy July 29`h -ly puppy San7y, now � rionths old had developed
3 skin lesions. Twice daily clay pac'.:s removed the irritation
so that he no longer licks the s:-in off, but the hard raised
b laces lesions re-~ain. He periodically develops boils on his
t,z where the rash from t?(e canoe , :•as.
i as
From August 2 until August 8 the weatrerlhot and h::r.id or the
--Ind w,-,s out of the north 'plowing funnes frog, the s.ranp. I .-as
nauseous, Sophie wouldn't eat the oup1_)ies wouldn't stay o,
to play. I beca: even pore Ill after eatin;- -)rod frcm my
garden. I became ill after eati grey . beans ir. the -:crai_ng on
August 4. I became even more ill after eati ng beets and beet greens
that evening. I became extremely ill the next evening after eating
a very shall amount of zuchini casserole. After eating the casserole,
I went to bed sick, forgetting to take the dose of charcoal I had
been taking at bedtime to reduce the synptom of Lnsonnia. I awoke
2 hours later at 11 PY August 5 chilled, sha_:ing, ,,d th nausea,
diahhrea and in extreme pain as every -uscle in : y body wa in
spasm. This was the same toxic- s: -oc% like condition from which I
have suffered since the spring of 1983 when I first came to live in
t he "inneapolis area. Previously I had experienced these profound
shoe.: li e symptoms at the time of menstruation.( I have not ub.:d tarpons
since that first e:cperience in 1983.) In this case I was not having
a period nor was I scheduled to have one.
Cn August 12 I nic::ed beans from my gar ^en and snap )ed .her. for
freezing. I became quite ill just handling the beans. Vy heads and
arms :ere covered with a strange odor which wol.11d not wash off with
soap. After I packed my hands and arris in clay, the odor was gone
and the nausea was reduced.
At73
Page 5
On August 15 the puppies did not want to be outside. The air
was bad again and I could smell the faint sweetness of freshly applies
ester. By mid mornI g I ,•ras nauseous with a headache. LucMly tie
were leaving town and were gone by noon, but both nupnies had diarhrea
by svening. Sophie also snellp ' li'•:e she had been in the harden
that morning and she beca: sic__ _4st. It now seers that poisonings
are nearly continuous as our ,;hob environment has becoTe so toxic
it's izr.possible to tell if :. are being -poisoned by toxicity renaini:?
from a prior application,by a new applicat'_cn or both.
As usual, we felt and ate much better up north. de stayed r.,ut of
town until the evening of August 20. The wind was still out of 6he
east and the air was still bad. We were. ill for several days after
returning. The air got worse as I drove from Mound to Hopkins.
Apparently the western suburbs had been "treated "by heljcn7tor on or
before August 15. Althc';,h Lake Langdon had not again been treated,
the wind had been steadily out of the east for a wee' so that our
neighborhood was again bathed in the fumes.
On August 2L, the swallows that had !:nsuccessfullY .ried to
*rest twice this sunmer were on the i• fires outside ^y door as usual,
silent and this time loo'__ing, strange, all puffed up _nd their color
loo'_:ed bad. That was the l -n.st tike they -.:ere seer.. They and %11
the other birds in the neighborhood are gone- dissap_ neared. 'Tot
a single bird remains. The only sounds to be heard are insects,
mosquitoes and cric''_ets.
On August 27 the htt- idity was high the atmosph pressure � :.'as
low, the air was very bad. I left my air conditioned ou for only
a few hours that evening but w .skstill sic': the following day with
nausea, diahhrea and gas. I have heard of at least sir: ot',er
people ;•rho were also sick that day ,rith 1111 1 4 _`:e c: -. -Moms.
On Sente ber 2 I noS;ed my 1,rass. T hat aftcr^ n ^ I
suffered a severe bout of _`.cpression. The next d,-.y I --uffered nr.l_'sea,
diahhrea —and g ^.s. .Tot only _s - ,O
Sente-.ber ? I , -!ent to 'e T horses s i'
a netit{on. On my first stop I learned thht Near, a 9 year old
schnauzer ha died. They had found his body or. August ,,Then they
returned from a weekend out of to-:r:. Sear had been in ny yard =^.: :_ ^g,
and playiAg with my puppies in JILne. His mist-ess said he . as not
very active in Jul he stayed in the house and was cagging up mucous
which sometimes had grass in it. She had not realized near was so
sick before he died because she had also been ill with flu like
symptoms that same week, the first week in August.
On the next stop I learned that an elderly gentleman living
for the first year across the street from the T,ranp had died on
August 7. I had first seen this gentleman in June sitting out in
his yard looking Dver at the trees and field bordering the swamp.
According to his wife, her husband was well in April. In May ':e
developed flu like symptom:, primarily nausea and e: :treee tiredness. .
In July his condition worsened and they spent the month gett-'ng
diagnostic tests -. They fo cancer throughout h'_s body with
A17y
Page 6
in the liver and brain. The pc.thologists were puzzled as they cc
not find the source of the cancer, the mother tu_ ^or. The week before
he died he was so weak ne couldn't walk without coil =psirg and was
hospitalized when he died on august 7.
The fifth dog which I had found that was ill following the
Yay 4 "treatment" died in June after 5 weeks of not eating and
becoming orogressively weaker. X -rays ta'ren just before death
showed a liver trnor.
11y dog Shadow who died on June 6 1989 after 4 weeks of illness
was so weak in the last 5 days that she collapsed when she tried to
walk. This was not starvation as I was force feeding her ^ilk
and vegetable broth with a turkey baster. In fact if more than four
hours pa gsed between feedings •.,ith vegie broth she would go into
convulsions.
I will risk repeating myself by saying that I firnly believe
that there is a very very serious problem here. I be? .'. zve '
problem is rendered even more serious by the fact that there is
no regulation or nonitoring of '11CD activities No agency to
investigate reports of poisonings or wildlife losses. Citizens
feel no recourse but to give up when complaints to the MYCD
are met with complete denial and then ignored. Repotts to the
Yinnesota Department of Agriculture are met with stall tactics,
insults and disparaging remarks.
I am enclosing some other reports and articles concerning
similar problems around the citi,s. I am not, as I've been told,
a single voice. The voices juste don't know where to go after
being lost in the dark hole of an indifferent bureacracy. ''either
the 15!CD not MDA will release a list of complaints. According
to minutes from a recent M'.'CD board meeting, there have been tholssands.
`ary Pacholke
2624 Westedge Kvd.
' "ourd, ?fin. 55364
472 -3008
U
a"Ur
LAND OF QUALITY FOODS
August 3, 1990
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Mary P�. holke KV0 AUG 81990
2624 Westedge Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364
SUBJECT: Pesticide Misuse Investigation
FY90(R)150
Dear Ms. Pacholke:
90 WE` ' PLATO BOULEVARD
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 551
(612) 297 -4872
The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has completed its investigation
of your complaints regarding improper pesticide applications to the Lake Langdon
area, applications which you claim have resulted in physical harm to both your
pets and yourself. After expending much time and resources, the MDA has
determined that no pesticide misuse has been substantiated in regard to these
complaints. In fact, the MDA has ound no evidence to document any pesticide
misuse, or any use of the particular pesticide you continue to assert as the
primary cause of your reported problems.
In view of your having contacted numerous public officials and agencies in regard
to your complaints and your expressed concern that your complaints have been
inadequately addressed, I believe it is necessary and appropriate t, offer a
brief overview of the actual complaints, the facts discovered, and the
conclusions drawn by the MDA.
Your initial cohiplaint alleged that you and your dogs became ill 'because of the
Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (MMCD) operations in your area,
specifically operations involving the application of the pesticide methoprene.
You reported the illnesses to the MDA approximately two (2) weeks after the MMCD
had performed the work near your home. Nonetheless, the MDA investigated your
allegations and determined the following:
1) Methoprene had not been used on, near, or in Lake Langdon at the time of your
complaint. This is important because you have continued to assert that ester
fumes emanating from a methoprene application have been the cause of your
human and animal health problems.
Inspection of MMCD pesticide application records verified that the pesticide
Bacillus thurin,;iensis (israelinensis) "BTI" was the product actually used
by the MMCD. Dr. Robert S,jogren, MMCD Director; Dr. Keith Solomon, an expert
in aquatic toxicology; Dr. Harrison Tordoff, a respected University of
Minnesota ecologist, professional aquatic and wildlife biologists from the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR); and MDA pesticide
specialists - are unanimous in expressing their opinions to you that it is
extremely unlikely that BTI would pose hazard to you or your dogs when used
MM ENJOY THE HIGH QUALITY AND INFINITE VARIETY OF MINNESOTA FOODS
GR
?74 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Ms. Mary Pacholke
August 3, 1990
Page 2
in the manner that MMCD utilizes; that it would not cause the symptoms or
illnesses which you have reported; and, that it has such a low toxicity and
a large margin of safety that even an intentional misuse would likely pose
little or no hazard to man or animals.
2) You, for whatever reasons you may have had, did not seek medical attention
for your claimed symptoms, and therefore have no physician's report, record,
or diagnosis confirming or even suggesting illness due to ,pesticide poisoning.
It has been MDA policy for many years that without medical verification of
injury, disease, or causative agent, the department must challenge an
allegation of harm due to pesticide exposure as evidence sufficient to
substantiate a pesticide misuse.
3) You did not have your dogs physically examined, diagnosed or treated by a
veterinarian. You stated to MDA that you successfully treated your dogs
according to instructions given to you by a veterinarian; however, after
taking the opportunity to speak directly with that doctor, I found that he
merely provided generic instructions to you for treating a dog possibly
suffering from an ingestion of a toxic substance, and at no time did he have
an opportunity to actually examine, diagnose or treat your animals. Your
self- diagnosis and self- treatment, without veterinarian examination, fails
to provide an adequate fou:idation for an assertion /diagnosis of canine illness
O due to pesticide exposure.
4) You have continued to persist in associating your dogs illnesses with
ingestion or exposure to methoprene. Again, no methoprene has been documented
as having been applied to Lake Langdon during the period of time involved in
your recent complaints. The pesticide application records for the May 4,
1993, Lake Langdon application were obtained from MMCD by MDA. A review of
those records verified that BTI had been applied, and not methoprene.
5) MMCD collected water samples from Lake Langdon which were submitted to two
separate laboratories for analysis. The samples were analyzed for the
presence of methoprene and blue -green algae, an organism known in certain rare
instances to be toxic to dogs. All lab results were negative.
Your second complaint was received by MDA on July 5, and alleged that a
helicopter had been seen "dumping or spraying" something into Lake Langdon
on July 2 or 3. You were adamant that the MMCD was again applying methoprene
you again claimed to smell what you described as an ester odor - despite
the previous agreement by the MMCD with you to use no methoprene product near
your residence, and to also notify you of any and all other MMCD operations
near your home. Again you reported personal and pet illnesses due to exposure
to whatever had been applied or dumped into Lake Langdon.
I asked you directly if ,ou witnessed the hel ;copter activity you were now
reporting to MDA. You responded that you had not personally obs.;rved this
event, but that your neighbor Molly Beilharz, and Molly's mother, had seen
it happen. You were vehement in your demands that the MDA immediately
42"
Ms. Mary Pacholke
August 3, 1990
Page 3
investibate his compl.'n and demanded that water samples be taken and
analyzed to substantiate the complaint.
In response to this second complaint the MDA did the following:
1) MDA contacted MMCD, and determined that MMCD had no operations whatsoever near
Lake Langdon on the dates reported. It appears from MMCD record reviews that
the MMCD had mosquito helicopter operations no closer than eleven (11) miles
distance to Lake Langdon on the dates involved;
2) MDA obtained water samples from the shoal waters of Lake Langdon, in front
of your lakeshore residence, and submitted the samples to the MDA Division
of Laboratory Se. - '.es for residue analysis. The lab was specifically asked
to analyze for •hoprene, and was also asked to perform a screen for
organophosphat cicides, a group of widely used insecticides. All lab
results were , :ve - no residues of any of these materials were detected.
Attached to t.: tter is a copy of the report of analysis;
C7
3) MDA contact 02 Beilharz' residence, indicated the substance of your
complaint to tip.' to "Mrs. Beilharz, and was informed that neither Molly
Beilharz or her mother saw any helicopter, saw any spraying or dumping from
any airplane or helicopter, or knew of any such activity on the dates you
reported. Molly Beilharz indicated that her mother thought she may have heard
an aircraft noise in the distance, perhaps a helicopter, but in no manner did
either of them witness what you described to MDA as having had occurred;
4) MDA followed -up by contacting a number of persons you indentified as having
had told you that their dog's had been sick recently, sicknesses you stated
to me were due to pesticide poisoning. The contacts I made responded that
they had indeed signed your petition calling for a cessation of MMCD
activities on or around Lake Langdon, but they also told me that their
particular dog's illnesses had occurred a year or more ago, and they really
had no reason to believe there was any association between mosquitio control
operations in their neighborhood and their dog's illnesses, at least not until
it was recently suggested to them by you; and
S) Once again, and for whatever reasons, you did not seek either medical or
veterinary attention for the illnesses or symptoms you again reported to MDA.
No records or other professional documentation has been provided to MDA to
verify your reported harm.
Numerous correspondence and telephone calls from several agencies -MDA, MMCD,
MnDNR- have reiterated to you that the product applied by MMCD on May 4, 1990
was BTI and not methoprenc. Despite this fact, you have drawn the conclusion
that methoprene was applied and that all of your personal and pet health
problems are due to exposures to that product.
To date, the MDA has expended many, many hours and resources in response to
v -ur complaints. MDA water sampling and analysis costs alone were in excess
Al"
•
•
Ms. Mary Pacholke
August 3, 1990
Page 4
of $500.00; additional analyses, with similar costs, were performed by MMCD
and MnDNR in response to your complaints. 0, state and metropolitan
agencies have had staff spending much time in performing on -site inspections
and other investigatory activities in response to your complaints, as well
as providing to you pertinent technical information that substantiates the
low rel: -tive toxicity and hazards of MMCD- utilized mosquito control products.
Apparently, none of the inspections, investigations, sampling, analyses, or
scientific information offered to you by these many persons has made any
significant difference in your deciding to continue to hold on to the now by-
and -large unsubstantiated claims.
Your legislative and government representatives, which you have contacted and
expressed your dissatisfaction to, have asked that a good and thorough
investigation be performed. I believe the MDA and other agencies have done
just that in response to your complaints. Unfortunately, you are likely to
be unsatisfied with our negative findings.
In view of all the matters described above, the MDA finds no compelling reason
to continue to investigate your complaints, and therefore is closing this
investigation. Unless you can offer additional factual, substantive, and
verifiable information to MDA, information that by itself will require this
investigation to be reopened, the closed file status of this case shall be
maintained.
Sincerely,
MINN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Paul Liemandt, Chief
Compliance and Enforcement Section
Agronomy Services Division
Enclosures
cc: US Senator Rudy Boschwitz
State Representative John Burger
Henn. Co. Commissioner Tad Jude
Dr. R.D. Sjogren, MMCD
Dr. Winter, Uptown Vet Clinic
Com.•nissioner Jim Nichols, MDA
Bill Bulger, MDA
Howard Krosch, MNDNR
Will Mlinson. MPCA
Lavarre Uffilken, USEPA, RegV
Wm., Molly Beilharz
Parker Hodges, Sailor Newspapers
•
A?
'� 4D OF QUALITY FOODS
2624 WESTEDGE
MOUND, MN 55364
LAKE LANGDON
Description of Sample
LAKE SURFACE WATER
2 x 1 LITER
Results of Analysis
The sample was vzed and found to contain:
Methoprene ND @EDL Neutrals, O.P.
Method: Neutral Extr.; mod. GC, FID
Organophosphorus pest. GC /MS
Analyst: G. Horvath
J. Eaton
Confirmation:
Laboratory Comments
PRIORITY A; $; LJV; NONAG -F ND @EDL: Estimated Detection
Limit was 0.1ppm. Sample screened by GC /MS
Case Number: FY90RI51
Region 5
Laboratory No.
R9007111
Date Collected
7/19/90
ND @MDL
Signature of Lab Supervisor Date
William Krueger / 7/20/90
Laborato,'y ) Copy
�'fFiE STq .
J w r
l�
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
Sample Number
AAW -2624
Product T -De
I, Water
90 WEST PLATO BOLL EVARO
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55107
)TA ENJOY THE HIGH OU ( AND INFIN VARIETY OF MINNESOTA F OODS
AA Fr)(]Al OPPORTLIUITY FMI'MYFR
R.D. SJOGREN, Ph.D.
Director
June 4, 1990
Ms Mary Pacholke
2624 Westedge "•vd.
Mound, MN 55346
Dear Ms Pacholke :.
w.J CAESAR
Business A—nin.
I am in receipt of your letter to Ross Green dated May 25,
1990. Let me say that I share the concern you have for the
weli being of your puppies. This past winter !h nearly lost
our family dog. I know how you must feel in trying to find
an answer as to why.
From the several phone conversations with Mr. Green involving
follow up information sent to you on May 8, 1990, coi,cerni - ig
the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District 04MCD) program and
the use and safety of our control materials, let me assure
you that both methoprene (Altosid) and BTI are not a factor
in the health of your puppies. These materials are
environmentally compatible and very specific in the control
of mosquito larvae (water stage of the mosquito) from a
natural or biological approach and will not harm wildlife,
pl +ants or people.
In our phone conversation o: May 11, 1990 you related your
knowledge in chemistry. Your statements of the toxicity of
Altosid do not agree with the technical literature or experts
in toxicology I am familiar with. If you have evidence to
the contrary, I would appreciate receiving it. Because of
the vast amount of technical information on Altosid and BTI
we have an extensive libr: :y of technical literature i- our
office which you are welc:".e to F--ruse.
In that same conver, :ation of May 11th I assured you that the
MMCD would notify you and use BTI in the Langdon Lake
breeding site north of your property anytime treatment is
necessary. That directive to staff has been in place since
. that date and you have that in wri per your request.
JUN 0 6 1990
METROPOLITAN MOSQUITO CONTROL "
23E(� V'dYC.1 IFF STREET c1 PGI�i ('.IIJI:E C`l l�,1 11 ( ^.(..:1(- -511^1P
A101
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
Ir
Ms Pacholke •
June 4, 1990
page 2
You have been concerned about the use of methoprene in that
site, despite Mr. Green indicating to you on May 8th, 11th,
and 25th that BTI was tt ontrol material used. I am
sending you copies of th >. section map and treatment record
for May 4, 1990. Copies of the map ant; treatment record have
also been sent to the Minnesota Department of Agriculture
(MDA) and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
(MDNR) .
To address the concern, of persons such as yourself, three
years ago the Metropolitan Mosquito Contrcl Commission
formed an independent Scientific Peer Review Panel whose
purpose is to search for adverse environmental effects from
the District's mosquito ccntrol program. This group is
funded at $200,000 .,r year to independently assess the areas
of greatest probabi-- impact and to provide research grants to
independent academic research workers. The research is
conducted totally independent of the L-'strict to provide
impartial judgement.
Search for adverse environmental impact has been underway for
the past three years. Drought conditions have limited the
C
ield studies up t) this year. However, laboratory results
are in from several. studies. The laboratory results, which
will be confirmed under field condition ;, suggest that the
dosage rates used are below that which will have a
significant adverse impact on the most sensitive non - target
aquatic invertebrate organisms found in the metropolitan
region.
Enclosed is a list of the members of the Scientific Peer
Review Panel (SPRT; which you may wish to call for an
independent evaluation of the research results to date on
Altosid and BTI. In our phone conversation I suggested you
contact Dr. Keith Solomon with the Canadian Centre for
Toxicology. If you continue to believe Altosid is harmful to
yourself or your dogs, the SPRP is the correct group to refer
your concerns to for resolution. If you decide after talking
to Dr. Solomon to pursue this matter further, please make a
formal request in writing to Dr. Richard Anderson with the
U.S. Environmental Research Laboratory and SP RP Chairperson
to that effect.
r
#"(X
JUN 0 6 1990
Ms Pacholke
June 4, 1990
page 3
If - in answer further questions, please let me knov. -
Sin(-e .:ly,
R , >' g��
R. D. Sjogren, Ph.D.
Director
RDS/ rdg
cc: John Burger, State Representative, Minne: to House
Tad Jude, Hennepin County / MMCD Commissioner
Alice Waller, Minnesota Department of Agriculture
Gary M - Minnesot,*. -. Department of Natural Resources
W '� ')lomon, Canadian Centre for Toxicology
Ri-. <;i Andersen, U.S. Environmental Research Laboratory
Bo '_man Twin City Helicopters
Susn;. Palchick, MMCD Aedes Program Manager
Ross Green, MMCD Public Inf,,. :mation
Wayne Johnson, MMCD Supervisor
•
A U3
Canadian Centre for Toxicology
L Centre Canadicn de Toxic(. �e�its
n
L
i ,
1
i
FAX N = S19 837 -31061
Thslik you for your letter received Juno 6, 1990 which I read with great interest.
I was very surprised to read that you fear that your dogs have been puisuiicJ with mett►oprznc
or ltaclllus thurlrlglensir fsraeliensis).
Methoprene is a chemical dial was designed as a mim,c of a natural insect hormone called
juvenile hurinone. It is a synthetic chemical but its mechanism of action is similar to a natural
compound. In insects, it inhibits Oie emergence of the adult by being applied when the natural iceretiun
ul' d►c hormone has ceased. It thus presents th adult or nuisance stage of the mosquito (run) emerging
from the water.
Only anthrupods have a receptor for juvenile hormone and this is best devclopw in die inssects.0
Vencbraies, (including mammals) do not have a reeeptur system for this hormone or its mimics and it
is of extremely low toxicity to mammals. In laburatory studies on mice and raw it bas not been possible
to cause toxicity, even at outregoously high doses of 2.5 nd per mouse. Methuprcno is wnhidomd as an
extremely low toxicity chemical and has even been added to animal fwd as it foul- through chemical in
cattle to prevent the development of horn -fly and other pest insects in the cow pus. Muhuluenc is tdsu
used in a household environment to u_ .trot fleas and in this use: Will humans and domestic animals come
into contact with it at rates of application that tee much higher Ulan those used in mosquito wrtrul.
Mcthoprenc has been used fur insect control since the early 70s and it has never been reponed to be toxic
to maninlals before. From this, it seems extremely unlikely that the symptums dhat you observed in your
dugs (and yourself) were caused by niahoprcne.
Bacillus thuringlewis Is a spore - forming bacteria that also produces ;u► endotoxin. This endutoxic
is a high mulecular weight protein that is nun -toxic as It is produced by the bacterium. Under Ole
conditions found in the insect intestine, the toxin is split into smaller mulecules, ono of which is tnxl� ta
die insect. Bacillus thuringlensis (1sruebrn3ls) Is a strain of the bacteria that is particularly toxic to
mosquitos and is used in mosquiW control. Tlhe toxin pruJuced by this bacterium is not toxic to
mAininals as they du not have the ability io activate tl►t: toxin to its active form. In fact, the use of
insecticides based on Bacillur 1buringlensis on food crulis is allowed up to the day of harvest as it
presents so little risk to humans.
Once again, it appears highly unlikely that BacilluA Murineirnsls could have caused Ole problem
01111 you observed. That you and your dugs Utrcanie ill is a clear and ullconte4tcJ observation but that
eiUier methoprene or Baci llus thurinblrnsls caused this problem is less clear. Without a thorough err
deuileJ turcisic analysis, it is impossible to be sure whal causal dl:. illneis but it may have bran
"c Gordon St , Guelph, ()n: NIG I'll ' Ttl: (Sit)) a:0.).QU - 4.45 r,.; l o1Aun, Gur',li, Oril NIG 1Y3 • Tt1:019) k37•.
Friday, Juno 8, 1990
4
Ms. Mary Pacholke
r
2624 Westedge Blvd.
e
i -L,
Mound, Mn. 55364
Drat Ms. Pachulke:
c < o c
i ,
1
i
FAX N = S19 837 -31061
Thslik you for your letter received Juno 6, 1990 which I read with great interest.
I was very surprised to read that you fear that your dogs have been puisuiicJ with mett►oprznc
or ltaclllus thurlrlglensir fsraeliensis).
Methoprene is a chemical dial was designed as a mim,c of a natural insect hormone called
juvenile hurinone. It is a synthetic chemical but its mechanism of action is similar to a natural
compound. In insects, it inhibits Oie emergence of the adult by being applied when the natural iceretiun
ul' d►c hormone has ceased. It thus presents th adult or nuisance stage of the mosquito (run) emerging
from the water.
Only anthrupods have a receptor for juvenile hormone and this is best devclopw in die inssects.0
Vencbraies, (including mammals) do not have a reeeptur system for this hormone or its mimics and it
is of extremely low toxicity to mammals. In laburatory studies on mice and raw it bas not been possible
to cause toxicity, even at outregoously high doses of 2.5 nd per mouse. Methuprcno is wnhidomd as an
extremely low toxicity chemical and has even been added to animal fwd as it foul- through chemical in
cattle to prevent the development of horn -fly and other pest insects in the cow pus. Muhuluenc is tdsu
used in a household environment to u_ .trot fleas and in this use: Will humans and domestic animals come
into contact with it at rates of application that tee much higher Ulan those used in mosquito wrtrul.
Mcthoprenc has been used fur insect control since the early 70s and it has never been reponed to be toxic
to maninlals before. From this, it seems extremely unlikely that the symptums dhat you observed in your
dugs (and yourself) were caused by niahoprcne.
Bacillus thuringlewis Is a spore - forming bacteria that also produces ;u► endotoxin. This endutoxic
is a high mulecular weight protein that is nun -toxic as It is produced by the bacterium. Under Ole
conditions found in the insect intestine, the toxin is split into smaller mulecules, ono of which is tnxl� ta
die insect. Bacillus thuringlensis (1sruebrn3ls) Is a strain of the bacteria that is particularly toxic to
mosquitos and is used in mosquiW control. Tlhe toxin pruJuced by this bacterium is not toxic to
mAininals as they du not have the ability io activate tl►t: toxin to its active form. In fact, the use of
insecticides based on Bacillur 1buringlensis on food crulis is allowed up to the day of harvest as it
presents so little risk to humans.
Once again, it appears highly unlikely that BacilluA Murineirnsls could have caused Ole problem
01111 you observed. That you and your dugs Utrcanie ill is a clear and ullconte4tcJ observation but that
eiUier methoprene or Baci llus thurinblrnsls caused this problem is less clear. Without a thorough err
deuileJ turcisic analysis, it is impossible to be sure whal causal dl:. illneis but it may have bran
"c Gordon St , Guelph, ()n: NIG I'll ' Ttl: (Sit)) a:0.).QU - 4.45 r,.; l o1Aun, Gur',li, Oril NIG 1Y3 • Tt1:019) k37•.
r
1
1 �
J
t
Letter of Friday. June 8, 1990, continuod......
infectious agent. This would account for the flow recovery you observed. The charcoal treatment would
have no effect on A bacterial or p rotozoal infection.
The observations on wild birds that you rcportod are interesting but I doubt that these are related
to the use of the pesticides on the lake. Birds, will frequently muvc nom one pond to anuther in search
of a more plentiful food supply or less prtdatur pressure. The rnovcmenu of' ducks Mat you observed
may hAvn bye,. a result of Uiesc natural behaviorid fespunscs and are urdikely w ht: m it result of the
pesticide treatments While It IN true th at ducks and other watcrluwl Arc qusle Sensitive w p es ticides such
as org;tnuphusphurus and carbaunate Ilt)CL'66CICS, they arc, like nwmni,ls, quite traistant to the juvenile
hormone mimics and w the Bacillus dwringlrrisls toxins.
While your description of the symptoms and the circumstances surrounding your dug% flints& was
must lucid and dctailcd, it is very difficult to accurately ►delstity the cause of the illness; however, from
tho extensive knowledge base chat has been develupal On these pesticides, 1 am sure that neither was the
CAW of the problem. Art intensive investigation by a forensic pathulugist may point to a possible cause
such as An Infection but I fear that fantrles that you took may nut be suitable for such investigation.
I trust that 1 have helped you but would be happy to supply you with further informatiun or to
answer your specific questions.
Yuurs sincerely,
4 ME IN
&
Keith R. Solomon, Ph.D.
Assuciate Direcwr
Educatiun
•
KRS /dill
cc: Dr. H. S jogren
MMCU
Arts
LM UNIVERSITY 0 h,iiNNESOTA
I TWIN CITIES
I
June 20, 1990
Mary Pacholke
2624 Westedge Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ms. Pacholke:
James Ford Bell Museum of Natural HWOry
10 Church Street S.E. "
Minneepolls, Minnesota 55455
J
I do trot know how to respond to your detailed account
of the treatment for mosquitoes of the marsh near your house
and the subsequent events. I am an ornithologist, not a
toxicologist. However, I serve on the scientific committee
Which is supe r'vi6ing research on possible non - target effects
of the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District mosquito
program, and I represent the interests of several groups
concerned about possible non - target effects of the program.
From all of the evidence to come to the committee thus far,
the sort of acute toxicity of methoprene reported by you iL
simply not supposed to happen. I do not know what the
possibilities are if normal application procedures are not
followed.
We have on our committee a group of highly qualified
scientists, including toxicologists, entomologists, and
various other kinds of biologists. I have full confidence
in the integrity of the committee. No one on the committee
Is interested in whitewashing any undesirable environmental
effects of the mosquito control program. The best I --an
think of to do for you is to circulate your report to each
member, hoping that anyone with something enlightening to
say about the incidents will write directly to you and will
send me a copy. Then, at our next meeting (not scheduled
until next fall), we can talk about it. Meanwhile, I
apologize for not being able to say anything more helpful
and I thank you for taking the time to report all this to
fie.
Sincerely yours,
44 rrs' 4 0n1 l . Tordoff
Professor
Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior
c:
r1
kit
Ms. Mary Pacholke
August 3, 1990
Page S
bcc: Kathy Hahne
Greg Buzicky
OR 187
J® WlcCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc.
October 8, 1990
Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT: City of Mound. Minnesota
City Hall Addition and Remodeling
MF'RA #8878
Dear Ed:
Enclosed is Shingobee's Payment Request No. 6 for work completed through
September 30, 1990, on the subject project. The original amount of this
payment request was $96,990.61. This figure includes change orders which are
not approved and work on charge orders which is not verified. These items
totLl $16,863.90 and have been deducted from the total payment request, to givo
a final amount for Payment Request No. 6 of $81,813.10.
• We have reviewed this request and, with our revisions recommence payment r:.r
$81,813.10 to the Contractor.
US.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Sincer'1-
McCOMB3 ) h'RANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Steven W. Jantzen, P.P. , ; , ,.I
SJ:jmj
Enclosures
C7
TO: CITY OF MOUND
5341 HAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MN 55364
ATTENTION:
CHA ORDER SUMMARY
-----------------------------------------
ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS
.......................
'OTAI PREVIOUS 17573.70 - 2098.00
................................
APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT PAGE 1
FROM: SHINGOBEE BUILDERS, INC.
PROJECT: MOUND CITY HALL APPLICATION NO: 6
PERIOD FROM: 09 /01/90
TO: 09/30/90
ARCHITECTIS
CONTRACT FOR: ADDITION / REMODEL PROJECT NO: 0
CONTRACT DATE: 04 /09/90
CURRENT STATUS
CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
PETAINAGE:
COMPLETED WORK
STORED MATERIAL
1415 PERIOD
CO # DAtE
12 09/30/90
898.00
13 09/30/90
14
15000.00
�„
_fi�
15 09/30/90
217.00
7tI f✓ S
6 8 09/30/90
340.00
19 09/30/90
858.00
j T
21 09/30/90
- 585.00
22 09/30/90
801.00
23 09/30/90
275:00
-2L- -69/3&f 90
-25-
2b-R-
. TOTALS -
-4894090 -
-2683.00
NET CHANGE
.10
- 46� .3G
THE UNDERSIGNED CONTRACTOR CERTIFIES THAT TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE
INFOf.MA'ION AND BELIEF THE WORK COVERED BY THIS APPLICATION FOR
PAYMENT HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCU-
MENTS, THAT ALL AMOUYTS HAVE BEEN PAID BY HIM FOR WORK FOR WHICH
PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT WERE ISSUED AND PAYMENTS RECEIVED
FROK THE OWNER, AND THAT CURRENT PAYMENT SHOWN HEREIN 1S NOW DUE.
TOTAL RETAINAGE (p217Z
TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE iagu&43- 5fc497o,7
LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES 483137.60
CURRENT PAYMENT DUE 96990.64 -0' �g��• L
BALANCE * RETAINAGE 229395.79 2311025, 7
STATE OF: m Ii COUNTY OF: hE'vmCrl
ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM 163297.00
NET OF CHANGE ORDERS -- •""am" S IZ19:7;
CONTRACT SLIM TO DATE -- 8696?6.99
TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED 6MZ3.ol
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO p BEFORE ME THIS
a DAY OF O Tt , 19 l d
NOTARY PUBLIC:
MY .
FRANCENS C. CLARK- LEISIN(IER
NOTARY PVILIC . MINNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My con.Inisawn anWu 9012/0
( ,ONTd� ' CTOR�
DATE: � `C• ` , C P -
---- --- •- - --.. ...... ......
ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT AMOUNT CERTIrIED ...............S g 14 1 0
in accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site (Attach explanation if amount certified differs
oL_ervations and the data comprising the above application, from the amount applied for.)
the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the ARCHITECT:
Achitect's knowledge, informatics and belief the Work has ^
r
O ressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in By: t ' Date:
rdance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor This certificate is n9t neggtiable. The AMOUNT
is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. CERTIFIED is payable only `to the Contractor
named herein. issuance, payment and acceptance
of payment are without prejudice to any rights
of the Owner or Contractor under this Contract.
CONTINUATION SHEET
APPLICATION AND
CERTIFICATE
FOR PAYMENT
PAGE 2
FROM: SWINGOBEE BUILDERS, INC.
APPLICATION NUMBER:
6
TO: Cl'Y
OF MOUND
PROJECT: MOUND
CITY HALL
APPLICATION DATE:
09/30/90
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND MN 55364
CONTRACT FOR: ADDITION / REMODEL
PERIOD FROM:
TO:
09 /01/90
09/30/90
...................................................................................................
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT
NO: 0
A
............................................
B
C
...............................
0
E
F
G
...............................
N
I
WORK COMPLETED
........................
......................................................
TOTAL
MATERIAL
COMPLETED
CAT
SCHEDULED
PREVIOUS
THIS
PRESENTLY
AND STORED
%
BALANCE
S
N0.
... .............................
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
..................................................................................................
VALUE
APPLICATIONS
PERIOD
STORED
TO DATE
COMP.
TO FINISH
RETAINAGE
1000
GERERAL REQUIREMENTS
84449.00
63329.25
12674.85
0.00
76004.10
90
8444.90
7600.41
2072
DEMOLITION
15359.00
11519.25
3839.75
0.00
15359.00
100
0.00
1535.90
2220
EXCAVATING, BACKFIIL 8 COMP
14820.00
11856.00
1482.00
0.00
13338.00
90
1482.00
1333.80
2513
ASPHALTIC PAVING
23000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
23000.00
0.00
2611
WATER SERVICE
12910.00
12910.00
0.00
0.00
12910.00
100
0.00
1291.00
2850
RETAINING WALLS
5176.00
3882.00
0.00
0.00
3882.00
75
1294.00
388.20
3300
CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE
72045.00
68442.75
3602.25
0.00
72045.00
100
0.00
7204.50
3415
PRECASE- CONCRETE
10450.00
10450.00
0.00
0.00
10450.00
100
0.00
1045.00
5120
STRUCTURAL 8 MISC. STEEL
15052.00
15052.00
0.00
0.00
13052.00
100
0.00
1505.20
6001
ROUGH CARPENTRY
6878.00
3782.90
3095.10
0.00
6878.00
103
0.00
687.80
6002
FINISH CARPENTTY
20045.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.UO
0
20045.00
0.00
7160
BITUMINOUS DAMPPROOFING
900.00
900.00
0.00
0.00
900.00
100
0.00
90.00
7240
COATED INSULAT; ^N SYSTEM
44740.00
33555.00
0.00
0.00
33555.00
75
11185.00
3355.50
7270
FIRESTOPPING
628.00
314.00
314.00
0.00
628.00
100
0.00
62.80
7532
ELASTOMERIC RO(iFING
14369.00
13650.55
718.45
0.00
14369.00
100
0.00
1
7900
JOINT SEALERS
1300.00
650.00
650.00
0.00
1300.00
100
0.00
130.00
8110
STEEL DOORS 8 FRAMES
10780.00
8085.00
2695.00
0.00
10780.00
100
0.00
1078.00
10
WOOD DOORS
2652.00
1989.00
397.80
0.00
2386.80
90
265.20
238.68
51
*
FLOOING SLAT DOOR
1140.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
1140.00
0.00
8360
SECTIONAL OVERHEAD
2671.00
2671.00
0.00
0.00
2671.00
100
0.00
267.10
8710
FINISH HARDWARE
8827.00
6620.25
441.35
0.00
7061.60
80
1765.40
706.16
8800
GLASS 8 GLAZING
5200.00
3380.00
520.00
0.00
3900.00
75
1300.00
390.00
9100
METAL STUD SYSTEM
28517.00
21387.75
4277.55
0.00
25665.30
90
2851.70
2566.53
9311
CERAMIC TILE FLOORS
3920.00
2352.00
784.00
0.00
3136.00
80
784.00
313.60
9510
ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS
3160.00
1896.00
0.00
0.00
1896.00
60
1264.00
189.60
9650
RESILIENT FLOOR
980.C3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
980.00
0.00
9680
CARPETING
13632.00
10224.00
0.00
0.00
10224.00
75
3408.00
1022.40
9900
PAINTING
18500.00
8325.00
1850.00
0.00
16175.00
55
8325.00
1017.50
10160
METAL TOILET COMPARTMENT
1142.00
571.00
0.00
0.00
571.00
50
571.00
57.10
10210
METAL WALL LOUVERS
1660.00
1660.00
0.00
0.00
1660.00
100
0.00
166.00
10400
SIGNS
898.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
898.00
0.00
10608
PARTITION FENCE
1126.00
1126.00
0.00
0.00
1126.00
100
0.00
112.60
10672
STOR'GE RACKS
1068.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
1068.00
0.00
13800
TOILET 8 EA1H ACCESS.
1530.CO
918.00
0.00
0.00
918.00
60
612.00
91.80
12512
HORIZONTAL LOUVER BLINDS
890.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
890.00
0.00
1:245
HY.RAULIC ELEVATCRS
34213.00
27370.40
6842.60
0.00
34213.00
100
0.00
3421.30
•
CONTINUATION SHEET
APPLICATION AND
CERTIFICATE
FOR PAYMENT
PAGE 3
FROM:
SHINGOBEE BUILDERS, INC.
APPLICATION NUMBER:
6
TO: CITY OF MOUND
PROJECT:
MOUND
CITY HAIL
APPLICATION DATE:
0 .'.00/90
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
PERIOD FROM:
owol /90
• NOUND MN 55364
CONTRACT
FOR: ACDITION / REMODEL
TO:
09/30/90
--------
---------------------- -------
-- ----------------------------------------------------•------.............----.........--••-
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT
NO: 0
A
.............................
B
......................................................................................
C
D
E
F
G
H
WORK COMPLETED
........................
...............
TOTAL
MATERIAL
COMPLETED
CAT
SCHEDULED
PREVIOUS
THIS
PRESENTLY
AND STORED
%
BALANCE
S
NO.
-----------•-•------
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
--- --- ----••-••-•---------
VALUE
APPLICATIONS
-- - -- ------•--•.......--•-•••--------•--------•.....
PERIOD
STORED
TO DATE
COMP.
TO FINISH
RETAINAGE
15000
HVAC
123700.00
80405.00
18555.00
0.00
98960.00
.......................-
80
74' 00
-----•.
9896.00
15400
PLUMBING
25775.00
16753.75
3866.25
0.00
20620.00
80
.00
2062.00
15500
FIRE PROTECTION
18500.00
11100.00
3700.00
0.00
14800.00
80
J.00
1480.00
16000
ELECTRICAL
57695.00
37501.75
8654.25
0.00
46156.00
80
.;J39.00
4615.60
17000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OVERHEAD i PROFIT
53100.00
37100.00
5300.00
0.00
42400.00
80
10600.00
4240.00
- SUBTOTAL - ORIGINAL CONTRACT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------••-----••--•---•-•------------
763297.00
531729.60
?,4260.20
0.00
615989.80 '
----••-----•-
81
-•----
147307.20
---- ---....
61598.98
CHANGE
ORDERS:
1
CHANGE ORDER #1
5500.00
2475.00
1100.00
0.00
3575.00
65
1925.00
357.50
2
DELETE DIRECTIONAL SIGN
- 798.00
-798.00
0.00
0.00
- 798.00
100
0.00
-79.80
3
SUBSTITUTE CONTROL SYS
- 1000.00
- 1000.00
0.00
0.00
- 1000.00
IN
0.00
- 100.00
4
(4A) BUILD OUT 1 OVERHANG
6350.00
2857.50
1270.00
0.00
4127.50
65
2222.50
412.75
6
DELETE SIGN CONSTRUCTION PR
•300.00
-300.00
0.00
0.00
- 300.00
100
0.00
-30.00
8
ADD'N OF SMOKING ROOM
2974.00
1338.30
1040.90
0.00
2379.20
80
594.80
237.92
ADO'L EXHAUST IN ROOM #105
517.20
517.20
0.00
0.00
517.20
100
0.00
51.72
� 9
0
PAINT METAL CAP FLASHING
1130.50
0.00
678.30
0.00
678.30
60
452.20
67.83
11
LOCKS FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1102.00
0.00
551.00
0.00
551.00
50
551.00
55.10
12
ADO'L DRYWALL i CEILING
898.00
0.00
89F.00
0.00
898.00
100
0.00
89.80
13
HAULING FILL
15000.00
0.00
7500.00
0.00
`-
50
7500.00
--718:99'
14
REVISED COUNTER, ....
-+
- 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
1572.00
0.00
15
MOVE DUCT i FAN IN ELEV. RM
217.00
0.00
217.00
0.00
217.00
100
0.00
21.70
16
INSTALL EXH. FAN IN GARAGE
-115 'lm
0.00
1155.00
0.00
100
0.00
-ps". '
17
HANICAP ACCESS COUNCIL PLFR
- T 8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
733.00
0.00
18
TRANSOM i MULLION IV308A
340.0:
0.00
340.00
0.00
340.00
100
0.00
34.00
19
MAUL CLASS 5 i BAD DIRT
858.C_
0.00
858.00
0.00
858.00
100
0.00
85.80
20
ADD CONDUIT, J BOXES, ...
-225S fit?
0.00
2233.00
0.00
- 2t19b9
100
0.00
21
DEDUCT FOR ASBESTOS REMOVAL
-585.0:
0.00
- 585.00
0.00
- 585.00
100
0.00
-58.50
22
ADD SMnKE DECTORS
?"1.0n
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
801.00
0.00
23
ADO'L VALVING TO BOILER
20 . :
0.00
275.00
0.00
275.00
100
0.00
27.50
2-
REROUTE DUCTWORK i ECT ...
- }�
0.00
1715.30
0.00
100
0.00
-1-* -
25
NEW ADDITON
- 839 tB
0.00
858.00
0.00
-05e-"
100
0.00
- 861189'
26
SOFFIT'S AROUND DUCTWORK
X396':90
0.00
1917.60
0.00
- i9+i-6
60
1278.40
- 444:-96'
27
EXH. FAN IN SMOKING ROOM
- 1485-$9'
0.00
1485.00
0.00
- gt5.e6 100
0.00
- 348.40
c i"' .1 "32
SUBTOTAL - CHANGE ORDERS :6827 -0 5090.00 23507.10 0.60 62 17629.90
................................ ........................ - ...... .... •.. .. 1172Z: - .................
.....-------•---.....-•--------------------- ----------- •- ........ -------- ......... _ ..... ....................................
. - GRAND TOTALS B695t'4-8&- 536819.60 1i, -'' 3`r 0.00 4;�s$rsrtw 80 164937.10 d4459•.f
- -• - - -- ------------- - - - - -- \'7`�1�57(o. ( �
..................... - � ,'? ---- • - - - - - - -- - �Z- 712.3c-
•
October 9, 1990 •
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
RESOLUTION LEVYING DEFERRED i SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENTS
UPON WAIVER OF FORMALI`T'IES: DIRECTING PREPARATION OF
ABSTRACT; i DIRECTING CERTIFICATION TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR
LEVY #11840 - $1,500.00
WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to Minnesota
St * Chapter 429, (Laws 1953, Chapter 398, as amended) has
th" ewer to levy supplemental assessments and the power to levy
dei ." i assessments; and
WHEREAS, the following assessments were not initially
lev in the projects as indicated, but waivers of formality for
sup iental and deferred assessments have been executed by the
pr(, - y owner and delivered to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
t: -- ty ,.f Mound, Minnesota, does hereby:
Pursuant to its authority under Chapter 429, Minnesota
Statutes, the City Council does hereby determine that •
each of the parcels of land hereinafter described have
benefited in an amount equal to the amount set opposite
each of the said parcels by virtue of the project as
indicated and that they be, and hereby are, assessed in
the amount set opposite each such described parcel, and
each such supplemental and deferred assessment shall be
payable in equal annual installments over such period
of years as shown:
INT.
IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT YEARS RATE kEV
15 117 -23 32 0204 Supp. Water
Connection $1,500.00 5 8.% 11840
The first of the installments to be payable on or
before the first Monday in January, 1991, and s� 11
bear interest at the rate of 8 per cent per annum fi.um
the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution.
To the first installment shall be added interest on the
entire assessment from the date of this resclution,
until December 31, 1990. To each subsequent
installment when due shall be added interest for one
year on all unpaid installments.
•
1
October 9, 1990
2. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time
on or before October 30, 1990, following the date of
assessments, pay the whole of the assessment against
any parcel, to the City of Mound without interest; and
he may until November 14, following the assessment
date, pay the whole of the assessment to the City
of Mound with interest accrued to the 31st of December
following the date of the assessment.
After November 14, following the date of the
assessment, the first year's installment shall be added
to the taxes for the year's tax list and collected as
taxes with interest accruing from the date of the
assessment through December 31 of the following year.
3. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified
duplicate of this assessment to the County Audi *or to
be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and
such assessments shall be collected and paid over in
the same manner as other municipal taxes.
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Mayor
•
Attest: City Clerk
2
A4if?
_ 1GF lr"�b
AP- C0: -01 CITY OF nOUw6 T;nE 1:.25.41
October 5, 1990
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER
RE: RECOMMENDATION FROM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
(EDC) REGARDING COUNTY ROAD 15 BEAUTIFICATION PLAN
At the September 20, 1990 Economic Development Commission (EDC)
meeting, the EDC reviewed the County Road 15 Beautification Plan
as it pertained to Mound. Mayor Smith suggested that the City
take the initiative and obtain quotations on landscape plantings
in front of the Lost Lake area and in front of the lot that the
Central Business District and City of Mound lease from Dakota
Rail (across from the House of Moy). It was moved, seconded and
carried unanimously to pursue this by obtaining quotations from
area landscapers and to bring these recommendations to the City
Council for their review and consideration. The Parks and Open
Space Commission is also supposed to be consulted on these
plantings. Mayor Smith suggested that this matter be brought to
the October 9th Council meeting so that if there was approval
from the Council, plantings could be installed this fall at these
two areas.
Also discussed was the -f the Lions, Jaycee's and
Rotary being asked to �7 Have any monies available
to assist in the cc ngs. Also discussed was
having Mr. Jim n d the County Road 15 Plan, a
landscape arccl , to get a price for the design
of a simila 110 between Mound Bay Park and the
PDQ gas stp
With regard to the
planting
costs, rather
than getting
specific
quotations from tree
nurseries,
I reviewed
the landscape plan as
it pertains to the
Lost
Lake area and the
parking lot
with Jim
Robin. We went over
the
types of plants,
ornu,nental
fencing,
etc. that he had proposed
and reviewed the
cost estimates
he had
used for the over
cost
estimate of the pro, ,_et. The
following
is his estimate:
0
ok 490
•
•
r 1
*COUNTY ROAD 15 BEAUTIFICATION PLANS ESTIMATE
L OST LAK ELA$LA
Quantity
175
8
Item Uniu Price Total pri
Isanti Dogwood Shrubs $22.50 $3,937.50
(3' off center)
Little Leaf Linden $? .25.00 $2.2 0QAQ
TOTAL $297.50 $6,137.50
PARKING _ LQ-k
2 * Colorado Biue Spruce 6'
6 Sargent Juniper 24"
Annual flowers in tree boxes
$250.00 $500.00
30.00 180.00
3 Marshall Ash 2.5' 225.00
Ornamental Fencing 200 Ln. Ft. -3 5.00
TOTAL
LOST LAKE AREA
PARKING LOT
TOTAL
700.00
675.00
$6,17.50
$ 9.0 55,QQ
$15,192.50
* Estimate based upon figures obtained from Mr. Jim Robin,
Landscape Architect, County Road 15 Beautification Plan
prepared for the Westonka Chamber of Commerce and Cities of
Spring Park, Orono and Mound - 1989
#* Cost may be more for smaller quantity
As you can see, the cost estimate is slightly over $15,000 for
these two areas. I see some problems with going ahead with this
project at this time.
First, vie are uncertain what the future of the Lost Lake area is.
We've looked at various plans to landscape the property and
without a more clearer definition of what the property will be
used for, I hesitate to spend these types of monies. Second,
with regard to the parking lot, as you know this lot is under
lease with Dakota Rail until November 1, 1990. Should the City
not exercise its option to purchase these properties, the lot
+off/
will revert back to Dakota Rail as of November 1 , 1990 and
subsequently, could be sold to another property owner or owners.
Until we have that matter resolved, I would hesitate to spend
monies on landscape plantings.
Finally, I am concerned about where we would finance plantings of
this type :since there is no specific budget for it. We could
look at possibly financing it through the Capital Improvement
Debt Service Fund, referred to as fund 130. However, this fund
is rapidly being depleted with other major projects already in
the works or on the drawing board to Ce implemented within the
next year. We could, as the EDC has reccmmended, check with the
Lions, Rotary, Jaycee's, etc. to see if there would be any
w;.11ingness to donate money from those groups. This is something
I haven't done yet since I wanted to review the estimate with you
to see if this is something we should be pursuing. The EDC also
asked that the Park and Open Space Commission be consulted on
these plantings. Their next meeting is scheduled for Thursday,
October 11, 1990, which is after Tuesday night's council meeting.
However, before I would even bring this to them, I would want to
get the coun.cil's direction. As I referred to above, my
recommendation would be to Loll until we have a more clearer
insight into the future use of Lost Lake and the future ownership
of the parking lot across from the House of Moy restaurant. .
With regard to a similar plan being developed for County Road
110, Mr. Robin had given me an estimate of approximately $2000 to
do a similar plan for the distance referenced above. My reaction
to doing a plan for County Road 110 is that we haven't been able
to implement the plan on County Road 15 and I would hesitate to
do one for County Road 110 until County Road 15 is implemented.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
ES:ls
•
X19 $.
BILLS -- - - - - -- OCTOBER 9, 1990
•
BATCH 0093
BATCH 0094
Unitog Rental Sept Uniform Rent
427.51
TOTAL BILLS 186,131.17
•
83.994.46
101,709.20
A1Y3
'�-C ^:•01
-� C E .- . • 0 , 4 .
C [ f T 1k NUND
VENDOR M OIIE H0.0
NO. INVOICE NMBR WE DATE STATUS AMOUNT [ESCRIPfION
2,6Q0.36 SEPT BER
r 10/04/ 10/04/90 2,6 0.36 ,FIE -CD
ACCOUdr "BER
71- 7100-nA
1610
[w'E i'!.
TIME 12.:5.41
PREPAID DECK
AMOUNT CHECK t DATE
s?99y
-J E r H H E F N A L
002 nl CITY OF V_IND TIME 12.25.41
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD PREPAID C1ECY<
NO. I NVOILE WBR D)IF DATE STATUS AMOUNT DE%RIPIION A_� �'lBER MOUNT XLy I DATE
54580 K.28 FUSES 0
145,44 FEPLACE BALLAST
•
1-1
C!' T I MOIAi :'
l IPE
15.06. 3
,t � . +� !'fi?+ t CE
DLE �C'L D
PRE -PAID
CtiECK
NO. INVMI WHI DATE
DATE STATUS
AAJLNT
It KC IF'TION
XMINT NUMKR
Am" 1
Dk )' I
DATE
Fc`s; cRE - P�ID
' 5.a7
L10
7 1-7100-'>`10
735..9'
JFNI -CD
1010
7?5,17
9 .0
9/18/
� 'AID
9 ' 1.1
LID
T!- 711X) -V!10
JR% -CD
1010
a�1.1
3ir96.3
vrx /v0
FELL F17+ iRF.RAT! tN VENDN TC'AL
PRE - PA!D
3 7:5.00
CR UN :ON 9 /1`, FR
O! 2040 00CA
JRV. - CD
1010
;7:5.00
30939
9/20/
CITY Cp •+TT CREDIT UNION VENDOF+ TOTAL
37:5.0('
_r >_n FRE PAID
18.23
ELEC DIMER
01-401 -0-4100
11.25
ELEC-COD IES
01 -0 -4100
2:.50
ELEC-POSTG
01-4060 -3210
2,97
ASSE55-ADDPESS CARDS
01-4070-2100
2.00
PAF FQS?G
01-4340 -3210
75
PWV41PAIR
01 4340 2300
3.00
F14-FAX
01 4090 3210
3.18
SWR -FAX
78- 7800 -4100
6.00
MM- DiAMFER MTG
01-4040-41:11
9 !28/ 9 0
9 1'8, 1 x0
69.88
JRNL-CO
1010
69.38
31
9/211
FfiE-PAID
59,98
REPLEN P /C- RESERVES
01-2300 -0220
9/28/90
9/28/90
59.98
.fX-CO
1010
59.98
30956
9/26/
CITY O VJND VENDDF
rora
12
Ccrm PRE -PAID
M.40
LIFE INS 9/15 PR
01-2040-0000
9/28/
9 122/ 9 +0
'.M.40
,3711. -CD
1010
233.40
30945
9/20/90
CJMEjtT.IAI- LIFE INS CO YEW TOTAL
233.40
01001 PRE -PAID
2,573.14
SIT 9 PR
01-2040 -0000
9/28/90
v /N/
2,573.74
JRN -CD
1010
2573.74
30931
9/20/90
('1 1551(MR OF kEVET1JE VENIGP TOTAL
2573.74
C10 ?? PREPAID
3,173.4
TEMP WIPING TW ADDTN
3n 6000 - 3100
& ?b,00
PACING SYST !
_,0 - W. - .`,000
9/28/90
9
3.89 2
Y1 t �D
IC10
3809.22
399F.5
v /;b .•_
C„N !Nvw,i ltL;.;4:4E SIR+ VE4ivr TC'AL
Ypv,22
CI;7 PRE PA!P
423.50
ONE TI!c': `ELE
30 6000 - 31Cy)
624.00
FIX ICE - T; E
30- 6000-3100
I r>'9.05
6 MOS LEA
30-6000 -5000
4.07
TELEP4Y1E
01 -3220
2
TELEF�Of
01- 40
5.05
TELEP"M *
01- 4(90-3220
2.76
TELEPVC
01 4040 K: {i
G
G�
631.+#3
TEIEk'rnk6._
01 4220 3220
374,37
TELEPNUE
01-4140 -3220
16.3.50
TtiLEF+7;NE
81.75
TELEP
73-7300- 3221)
s?99y
-J E r H H E F N A L
002 nl CITY OF V_IND TIME 12.25.41
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD PREPAID C1ECY<
NO. I NVOILE WBR D)IF DATE STATUS AMOUNT DE%RIPIION A_� �'lBER MOUNT XLy I DATE
54580 K.28 FUSES 0
145,44 FEPLACE BALLAST
•
1-1
It
of 002 41
C IT Y OF P%N[i
TIME
15.0639
.f4nlR
I WO; Lt RX HELD
PRE -PAID
OfCK
NO. INVOICE NMBR
DATE WE STATUS
AM JNT
DESIItIPTION
ACCOMT M1118ER
AMOLNT
NECK I
DATE
31.75
TE!EFIAX
18 - 7340-32:0
1`,6.:
TELEFfM
!x.54
TELEP47ME
4l 4?44 3220
.15
TELEPHOME
.2- 4170 -320
V.10
TELEP41%- CfVfUTER
::- 4170-7
9 1 1 2 1 3% 0 0
3,0!.57
JRNL-CD
1010
3801.67
30964
91
C,NT'WNTAE TPLtPHOE VENDl1R TOTAL
I.67
01145
FRE-PAID
4" ?,54
SF Cl DOOR
22-4170-3530
9 % _9. 0 0 9/:
428.`.-0
J;1% -CD
1010
428.50
30961
91:7/90
2=40ORD [OCR SALES VEN[OR TOTAL
4:3.94
::17E•
PRE -PAID
474,17
C811 LEASE
44 -6000 3910
9/2'8/?) 9/28/
474,17
JRNL-CD
1010
474.17
30
9/26190
VkE W. 9ERPLpF
VENCCF 'OT AL
474,17
0121
PPF. - PA! D
13
N CONTRACT Oj;S
51 -4350 -3100
15.62
MILEAGE-DELL
81-4350 -3340
91231 9I.9 %
4
YX -CD
1010
205.22
30926
9/18/90
DOBERG RUDOLPH
VENDOR TOTAL
205.22
D1328
PRE -PAID
27.+5
C.O.W. MTTG MEAL
01- 4020-2200
9/22/ 9/2`e/90
27.95
JOIL -CD
1010
27.95
30928
9/18/90
1ND'S PIZZA
VENDOR TOTAL
27.95
D1
PRE -PAID
331.24
CBD LEASE
40-600-3910
9/28/90 9/28;90
331.24
JRNL -CD
1010
331.24
3096
9126/
DR ROBERT LAMER
VENDOR TOTAL
331.24
E1429
PRE -PAID
201.26
LIQ
71- 7100-9510
78.25
W 114
71- 7100-9520
4.02-
DISC
71-7100 -9560
9/2800 9/ x'
275.49
JPNL-CD
1010
275.49
30
9/18/°0
PRE -PAID
22A. ?9
LID
71- 7100-9510
`0.65
WINE
71-7100-9520
4.52-
DISC
71- 7100 -9560
i:D
1410
725.52
30953
9/25/90
cr' PHILLIPS & SINS
V!h:0 TOTAi
:4 _30
nf.c:;C
°, ° {�,n4
A1rArA I ICMA C13F -E5
01-4C'40-4110
')C!
1pll ..
1010
5`4.00
34929
9
daa
ccs
3 - -, Y
[:. PR4j . HkL
30- 60010-3100
X
E
1010
- 3397. - 10
3<f'16
9/18/
It
T4E
F U R C ASE ; C I; F' N A L
qP -U'02 O1
CITY OF MOUND
TIME
15.Lb.3
WNDOR
I"! CE DUE HOIL 0
m - Fi.; D
CHECK
NO. INWICE NMBR
DATE DATE STATUS
AMUT
fESCRIrTION
ACCILKI NI ?ER
"T
Dkt K: 1
DATE
G 171
KE-PAID
4, 107.42
PLAYGROUND MATERIALS
60-6,'x0-5000
o /:3 /
4,10
JRNL CD
1010
Il
`,
GAME TIME
VENDOR TOTAL
4107.42
G1'Q55
FXf-PAID
1,165.00
[EF COMP 9 /15 PR
01-:'040-0000
9/28/90 9/,
!,iS5.00
JRHL-CD
1010
1165.00
1;PEAT WF5T L:�E ASSLfANCE brtNDOR TOTAL
1165.00
G1
PRE -PAID
50.00
NO CENT AYAiA CONE- SKINNER
73 -7300 -4110
9 /:x /'0 9 ':31 9 0
50.0
JRL
1010
T.UO
u(:,0
GF'EG SKINNER
VENDOR TOTAL
50.00
G1a71
PRE - PAID
268.87
GRP HLTH OCT PREM - 9/15 PR
01
0 /18/90 01 28/ , 40
268.87
JPN_-CD
1010
26,9.87
3 42
or ran
GFOLI HEALTH PLAN
VENDOR TOTAL
268.37
G1 °72
PRE -PAID
522.20
LIQ
71-7100-9510
431.20
WINE
71-7100-9520
14.76-
DISC
71-7100-9`.,60
15.35
FRT
71 -7100 -9600
24.27-
MIX
71- 7100-9540
9/28/90 9/2R/90
929.72
JRNL -CD
1010
929.72
309:1
9/18,
PREPAID
683.28
LIQ
71- 7100 -9510
67.95
WINE
71-7100-9520
14.97-
DISC
71-7100 -956C
7.47
FRY
71 -7100 -9600
62.25
MIX
71- 7100-9540
9/28/90 9/28/90
805.98
JRIL-CD
1010
805.98
30'951
9/25/90
GPIGGS COOPER 5 COMPANY VEN11OR TOTAL
1735.70
H2145
PRE -PAID
2863.46
DED 9/15 PR
01-2040-0000
9123190 4/28190
228.46
JRtL -CD
1010
288.46
30M33
HFNN CO SUIFORT 6 CRY LECT• VE`Ct)<R TOTAL
288.40
;2))i
PRE -PAID
512.90
ICMA 457 9/15 PR
01-2040.0000
9/28/ 9 /28/°0
512.90
RC-CD
1010
51 ?.90
V
9 /.10lXi
1r_v A PEIIRIMENT TPUST 457 VENDOR TOTAL
512.99
1': 4
Fq -PAID
91.98
ICMA 401 9/ PR
01- 2040-WjU
9 /24/90 9 !28190
91.98
JIRN -CD
1010
91.98
?
[CM RETIFTMENT IRLST -401 VE!4(Y TOTAL
9 1. 9 8
J2`71
PRE -PAID
337.00
50 CONTRACT Hf>7llFRS
01- 4340 -3100
94,36
14 CWRACT HOURS -TAFFE
01-4W -1300
9 ! - lqill0 x/29/90
431.36
JRHL -CD
1010
431.36
3(D7
9, : . '-/ , ;)
•
X99`
= 4
F H A 5 E 1 C 4 N A L
AP- CO2 -01
CITY OF MOUND
TIME
15.06.39
1 1"DOR
1!V1OFE DUE HOLD
PRE -PAID
CHECK
NO. INVOID£ NMBR
DATE DATE STATUS
A14"T
DESCP.IPTION
ACCT HUMBER
AMMW
CHECK 1
DATE
1DNN TAFFE
VENDER 'OTAL
431.
w 7Q
PRE -PAID
1,0
LIQ
71-7190-
40?.58
WINE
71-7100-95?0
25. 0 6-
DISC
11-7100 -9560
1,173,46
. _FK -CD
1010
1473.46
30922
9118/90
PREPAID
3,106.58
LID
71- 7100-9510
555.01
MINE
71-7100 -9520
60.49-
DISC
71- 7100-9560
9/28 1'90 Qr81 1 90
3,6£+2.10
JPTL -CD
1010
3682.10
30952
9/25/90
JD46M BROS WHOLESALE LI# VENDOR TOTAL
5155.56
JI
PRE -PAID
:5.30
MTGS-JS
01-4190 -4120
c39.09
''B0 COW
01 -4190 -4110
2 3.01
CALCULATOR
01- 4190-2100
x/28/ 9 /22/ 9 0
636.
JRNL-CD
1010
686.90
30966
9/28/90
JL>N SUTHERLAND
VE_N!9DP TOTAL
6°6.90
K,>712
631.93
CBD LEASE
40- 6000-3910
9/le/90 9/28/90
6.31.13
JRNL -CD
1010
631.93
30919
9/18/90
KOENIG & SCHiERT
VENDOR TOTAL
631.93
PCM51
PRE -PAID
11,291.98
FIT 9/1`1 PR
01-2040 -0000
9/28/90 9/28/90
11,291.
JR L-CD
1010
11191.98
30930
9/20/90
W av TE BANK - MOUND VENDOR TOTAL
11291.
M30 4 ^
PRE -PAID
1,316.56
OCT -MED CNTR 9/15 PR
01- 2040 -0000
9/28/90 9/28/90
1,316.56
JR►i -CD
1010
1316.56
30943
9/20/90
MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN VENDOR TOTAL
1316.56
M3268
PRE -PAIln
212.38
MBA 915 PR
01-2040 -0000
9/2P/90 9/28/90
212.38
JK. -CD
1010
112.38
30944
9/20/90
MI BENEFIT ASSN
VENINR TOTAL
212.38
PC401
PRE -PAID
285.00
DEF COMP 9/15 PP
01- 2040 -0000
9/.'8/90 9/28/90
288.00
YNL-CO
1010
288.00
30
9/20190
MN RETIREMENT SYSTEM VENDOR TOTAL
28:3,00
M3520
PRE -PAID
65.00
"_TG -MTR BILLS
73- 7300 -3110
65,00
POSTG -MTR BILLS
78-7800 -3210
1?0.00
,J -CD
1010
130.00
30948
9/21/90
PM POSTMASTER
VENDOP TOTAL
IV. 00
X61
PRE -PA10
3,3^5.:0
CBD LEASE
40-6000-3
9i' ? /cn
1 ,3 `..N'
JlP!L - CD
1010
3385.20
30959
9/26/90
M!f'.IER/! AkSiNG PR Ff FiT iE5 '1FN[ : '0'AL
_r, ,, 20
a9!)
ck:j 5
c,
_�...E _ - . - ti
ILA'E
.''.
s-L02-01
CITT OF ORND
TIME
15.06. ?
V�MIQ'
IMICE D& HOLD
c%_PAID
C►ED
NO. INVOICE WW
DATE DATE STATLIS
ARITINT
I( SUP! FTION
Acc"T MfiEER
AIilU1rT
LALY I
DATE
Nrti31
PREPAID
5
M_4_ 0; 1`. Pq
01 c;..'+0
5'1,5R
JF* -CD
KP11AL NE►iT LIFE V %rL9P TOTAL
577.5P
ckoo
PRE -PAID
`51.24
AUG �! ECT.;' ITT
7o. ?7
AiJG EUC RiCITr
Oi-43 -3710
711..4
AX E,ECTR'r'1TT
471.40
AUG ELECTRICITY
71- 7 100 -3'10
151.
ALC EL£L'TR!C1 ?T
;-4170-3710
2,4
AUG ELECTRICITY
73-7U -3710
;,2.0.15
AM ELECTRl -!'
78 '800 ?710
144.;0
AUG ELECTRICITY
78 -7600 -3710
9/281 9/18/90
5,957.40
JFM -Cs
1010
59,7.40
30;117
0 118 '�0
KFTHERN STATES POWR CO VENDOP TOTAL
5957.40
"1
PRE -PAID
165.00
HOTEL A" CLM
73- -4110
9icR /a) 9/MM
!65.00
YW-CD
1010
165.00
30
9/14/ %)
OU14._5T INN
VENDCP TOTAL
!65.00
P'3
PK - PAID
6,718.73
PERA 9/15 PP
01- 2640-0000
9/28/90 9/28/90
6,713.73
Flt! CL
1010
6716.73
30932
9;.'0/90
P E. R A
iENDrFt TOTAL
6718.73
P4130
PRE -PAID
7,814.46
OCT P1p 9/15 PR
01-2N0-0000
299.50
OCT PF RETIREE
01- 4140-1510
9/_8/90 9128!9(
8,113.96
Jill -CD
1010
8113.96
')41
9/:0/90
PMTSICIANS OF Mr
VEMiOR TOTAL
8113.96
V171
PRE -FAID
1, .38
LIQ
71- 7190-9510
103.25
MIFF
71- %100-9520
27.46-
DISC
71 -71% -9560
9128/90 9;28/90
1,3K17
JitL-CD
1010
1396.17
30924
9/18/90
PRE -PAID
2,359.11
LIQ
71- 7100 -9510
196.71
M1FE
71- 7100- 1 ? 9 ,N-
49.17-
OiSC
71-7100-9
911/9v 9/28/90
?,506.65
F?Fl -CD
1010
2506.6.`
30?`A
9/:5/
WV. JTY MITE 6 SPIRITS VENIbR TOTAL
r'40 „$2
R4117
PRE -PAID
70.00
DED 0 i15 PR
0 -0000
91 9!28/
70.00
0t-CD
1010
70.W
3(f
c
CET” t PON1.1,01)
VENUIF TOTAL
70 -00
who
PPE - PAID
`;18.0(
4) C_Oh 'ACT HOUP5
" 4?40-31rX/
64.`
6 CONT PACT HIM
nl- &.W - 11T
9/ -b 0 /:h %9rJ
60:.5,
FfE-CG
101 "7
601
3
R!F 9T F ,X+1511
VEN'JOF TOTAL
e
•
X41 f
w
:, d+
!t✓
c a S E N DATE 9 !_?''�
C0: 91 CITY OF MOLND TIME 15.06.39
�N INl'O10E OLIE HOLD PRE -PAID DIED(
NO. INVOICE MJ[$ DATE DATE S T A TIS AMXLNT DE x7 I P T I DNi ACCLI NT MJR AMQlflT DtC1( ! DATE
y E 1rSF FOFfS
-.1 c -CO
51.'y
5(M.. K
PRE ca,n
•�r xw0 , ';ti ;cn
STATE NOAF'D OF ELECTRICITY
'VENDOP ".
s� `11
F -�a1n
1,51 ^.3
v;N"'0
S'A'E r Ar :TOL [1441
INICN'ANCfC T0'AL
k":+
FSf �'AIU
1,:10. 10
Fr1-CD
WESTONA COMP(INITY
ACTH NF 'F-W TCTAL
'M "73
KE WAID
451.78
.ML -M
Q1CV WILLIAMS
, FNDOR TOTAL
26162
PRE -PAID
9/-8/ +'/28/0
PAIL 6 PATRICIA MEISEL VEN•UOR TOTAL
TOTAL ALL VFNDIN''
y E 1rSF FOFfS
-.1 c -CO
51.'y
5(M.. K
CP UN 10N 9 / 15 PR
1,510. 2'
WA RENT, TELE
1,51 ^.3
-F'L-CD
1510. ?
1,_10.00
ADVANCE-TRY INSP COMf-R WILMIS
1,:10. 10
Fr1-CD
1210.00
451.78
CPO LEASE
451.78
.ML -M
451.78
8-1,994,46
01-/1
1010 `4.00 30955 9i.
Ol -2 -0000
:010 508.9 30940 9 /20/90
16-5886-4100
1010 1510.37 3DY62 9/27!90
4110-4110
1010 1110.00 30918 9/18/90
40-6000 -3910
1010 451.78 30957 9/26/90
•
co 93
•
A111
s0
A l
-7,
•
•
CITY OF VA-I'D
TIME 12-5.41
7. :01 Q 1
PRE-PAID DtD
4C. "Fp
[4� T E
ArJN'
I SCQ!PTTON
" �C^,T NLPKR
AM)LNT CHECY I DATE
I
Y1. 4 1
3FLIrF 9yll 1 F s
I rE KFp IFS
54
OF 1 YJ , . :Fc ,
1 5 , , ' 4
'IF w ICE %Fv :E5
Cl 41 2100
4.5
CF ICE SWPI 1 E 5
-4340- '1
OF; I cl %VC11ES
01 42%
OFr I cl 3LvL iE5
7 1-7100. 2100
OF;!CE K:P;�. ES
7 3 7 300 - :: W
7 8.78W-1 1 100
I
014W-2100
A
1010
W;.r_ "J< Nyc r AL
I i' 1 3
'70,'ol
I - -
Kk OIL
01-4
f) jr; •"^14 li;
:' n. 50
J; w - _
1010
vNIVIP 10
2
:0
1 10.00
TEES -81 WTR "[S
71-i"W-6120
l ei. m
JPW _Cv
1010
Afo-RFAN W�
644 ')ENDOR TOTAL
50.N
49.61
MAIX
01-4320-2100
10/04/90
48.61
Ok -Co
1010
AW'W% p4FCR
VENDOR TOTAL
48.61
410 ?It 0
85. 50
SPECIAL MO - POL I CE
10-16000-3100
10/64/90 10/04
85,50
JRNL-CD
1010
APOLLO MDVIWj SFMALISIS
IkW TOTAL
85.50
100.68
FLUIDS,BLILBS
01-4290-2250
10 /M /' 1 0 10/04/00
100.68
At-CD
1010
BATTERY & TIRE WHSE,INC VENDOR TOTAI,
100.68
?
5.90
SEPT OXYGEN
73- 7300-
5.50
SEPT OXYGEN
78-7800-2200
5.
SEPT OXYGEN
01- 4 290 -' : ' I V
10,104/90 10/04/
16.500
JRW -CD
PAII&F CLIKW
VPNjIOf; Tolk,
'A
W
479.00
CLC4 HALL
4A.52
SEPT GARBAGE
1'03.
KPI GARBAGE
65.72
SEPT GiPFAa
6
JPNL_cD
009Y
W! S'N
ToTrj_
644.02
0
IYIIEN'TT SLEETS
71-1100-
6-Z 3.
x,10
P& _CI)
1010
s0
A l
-7,
•
•
,soot
!q
EE �_.
14IE.,:4.
AF CP: 6
CITY OF M0.ND
TIME
VENDOR INVOICE DLE HOLD
PRE -PAID CHECK
40. INVOICE W R DATE DATE STATUS
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
ACCOLMT Nl ffR AMOUNT CHECK t DATE
'NESS rECORDS COR TATI VEND[p TOTAL
00 .10
Cgcr
1:.57
W,'rR ?!LL-!!Q
71- ?740
10/n4;� 10104
!.,5
YW -CG
1010
C Y OF MOUND Vp1DC4+ rOrk
1 2.57
Cr
16.0
0 THRU 11 WINTOM .J.EAN
71 7100 '20
10'Mro0 Igm410
I6.`A
.FNL-CD
1010
CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES VENDOu TOTAL
16.50
rn
16.71
SEPT RUG RENT
01-4;:0 -4210
25.48
SEPT RUG RENT
71-7100 -4210
10104 /
42.19
JRNL - LI)
1010
r_'-jN STEP RENTAL VENDOR T014L
42.1
COp
326.28
51PT MIX
71-7100-9'540
10/04/ 10;04 /
3:6.28
JRNL - CD
1010
'MCA COLA BOITLING- MIDWEST VENDOR TOTAL
326.28
01024
327.00
SAW BLADE
01- 4280 -23110
10/04/ 10/04/90
327.M
M -CD
1010
CXWE SAWING, INC. VENDOR TOTAL
327.00
I!V
14.00
DUPING FEE
78-7800 -4200
111.27
BLACK DIRT
80- 8000 -M
10/04/90 10/04/90
147.27
JRNL-CD
1010
D J EXCAVATING VENDOR TOTAL
147.27
D!178
19.50
LUNCH - SCHOOL
01-4140-4110
10/04/90 10104,'90
19.50
JRNL -CD
1010
MN!EL NICCLM Vf!I6% TOTAL
;
01!90
4.1n
BAL DUE
73-7:100 -2300
10/04; 10/04/+0
4.80
'PC -CD
1010
DAVIES WATF EQUIPMENT VENDOR TOTAL
4.fo
D!2%
3,7:5.20
SEAT BEER
71- 7100-9
10104 !0/04/90
3,725.20
31ft -CD
1010
DAY DISTRIBUTING CO VENDOR TOTAL
37 `.20
0126
83.96
D19MABLE PANTS
10/04/9010/04
83.6
,f?NL - CD
DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY VENDOR TOTrt
83.46
D!'
417.00
SE IT CHIEF 94 -ART
,soot
!q
30QA
r
f
�
u � ""Ar�•� 1�,.``�t�r� � ff ta" - nee �'
r
A`
t
•
E
C�
fJ • C
CITY OF MOUND
TIME 1:,:5.41
VENDOR INVOICE al 4x
NO. INVOICE WBR DATE HATE SWUS
'4RXNT
[ESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NLrBER
FIRE -PAID CHELk
AMXINT CH[Lx 1 DAZE
lOrn4l90 10, 1 04/`�-;
417.0o
JR!t-CD
1010
?iYl� p c� +Cf IAViCQ
417.kx.
01130
105.00
I` , () yrK; SI!U
01- 4320 -2;x)0
10 +'�0 10�M;o0
Il5.n0
,F'vl-Ct
,
.010
00N'S SOD SEWICE VEW TOTAL
Ict,kx:
G1 ?32
:97.:0
C1+lORti�
:52.63
FLUORIDE
73 7300 -2:60
10/M/ 10/041%
5.,''4.83
,.pt-CD
1010
OPC IN1l15TRIES, INC. VENDOR TOTAL
`..$).83
01350
28.00
LP GAS
0!- 4..V -2 , )0
10/04/90 10/01/
;8,00
,W -CD
1010
MO "S 66 SERVICE VENDOR VAL
28.00
01160
1,755.00
ASPHALT CARDINAL,LTNW%D
78-7800 -4200
675.00
ASPHALT- BEALHMOOD
18-7800 -4200
675.00
01HA+_T-BEACHIMD
73-7300 -4200
10/04/90 10/04!90
3,105.00
JRNL -CD
1010
-' )RE ASPHALT COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL
3105.00
5,311.35
SEPT BEER
11-7100-9530
10/04/90 10/04/90
5,317.35
JRNL -CD
1010
1 -. ,I[E BEVERAGE VENDOR TOTAL
5311.35
4.00
MTG-ES
01-4,'40 -4120
10/04/90 10/04!90
4.00
JRNL -CD
1010
SHtJFLE VENDOR TOTAL
4.00
90.00
PUP LIFT STATIONS
78-'300 -4200
10/04/90 10/04/90
90,00
JRNL -CD
1010
.LR J. PETERSON CO. VT M1L1R TOTAL
90.00
E1490
63.00
RISER RING
78 -7800 -2300
10/04/90 10/04/90
63.00
JRNL -CD
1010
ESS BROS AND SONS INC VENV TOTAL
63,00
FI6 ?I
57.50
FEES -82 BONDS
58 - 6000 -6110
10/04/90 10/04,M0
51.50
JR14- -CD
1010
FIRST TFUST VENDOR TOTAL
57.50
F1690
40.95
SEPT MIX
71- 7100-9540
49,54
SEPT MISC
71-7100 -
!0!nu 10/C4/
90.49
JRt -CD
1010
30QA
r
f
�
u � ""Ar�•� 1�,.``�t�r� � ff ta" - nee �'
r
A`
t
•
E
C�
•. E 4
.
E..
AP- CO2.01
CITY OF MOUND
T ;ME 12.25.41
VE)KCR
IM :OICE DUE HOLD
PRE -PAID CHECK
NO. INVOICE NMBR
DATE DATE STATUS
A"'
LESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK, t [LATE
D1 OUR STAR B•:R SUPPLY
VEHDCK' TOTAL
4 0.4 0
'10
7.5,
E'HICS 4TG
014-40 -41:0
1n�Ai90 10/041
1,
R'L CD
10!0
FRANCENE rte'
VENDER TOTAL
7.
G1"
171.32
CLUTCH,K4ES LEAK
01 480 ?810
1010 10/04/
'71.32
JRNL -CD
1010
6ARY'G n*.Lxl SERVICE
VEIM TOTAL
JIM
120.00
RADIO REPA,
01- 4140 -4200
10104/ 10/04/90
10.00
,fit -CD
1010
GENE RAL CC'!z_ i! '
le', ;T:a_
1 .20.00
n
SEPT MARSHALL SALARY
22 - 4170 - 13 7 0
JRNL-CD
1010
'PT MATER COOLER
01-4140-4100
20.79
SEPT MATER L, :_ER
01-4280-2200
8.50
SEPT MATER COOLER
73-7300 -2200
8.51
SEPT MATER COOLER
78- 79DO-M
1404190IV/04/90
134.00
M -CD
1010
O UNWOOD INGLE,.%"-
VENDOR TOTAL
134.00
01910
11.62
BUSHING
22-4170-2200
10/04/90 10104/90
11.62
JRNL -CD
1010
GOODIN COMPANY
VENDOR TOTAL
11.62
Gi970
14.22
AMMA COW BAL DUE-OS
73- 7300-4110
10/04/90 10/04/90
14.22
JRNL-CD
1010
GREG 5040
VENDOR TOTAL
14.22
!fn30
210.56
REPAIR TRK WINDSHIELD
01- 4340 -3810
1 0/04/90 10/04/90
210.56
JRNL-CD
1410
HARM 'H GLASS
VENDOR TOTAL
210.56
H2140
472.74
AUG B"ING FEE
01-4110-4:`x'
10/04/90 10/04/
472.74
JRNL-CD
1010
WM CD SHERIFFS DEPT VENDOR TOTAL
472.74
H210
4`4.50
AUG BOARD
01-4110-450
10/04/
454.50
,Rt-CD
1010
4 CO THE -9KR
�TEVO? TOT
4`,4.50
•
U3
•
•
•
31064
AP CO2 nl
CITY OF MOUND
TIME 12.°.41
VENDOP
INVOICE DUE HOLD
PRE-PA;D CH<CY
NO. INVOICE W..AR
011E DATE ST4TLlS
AMWNT
DESCRIPTION
ALTOWT NUl%R AMt"T CHECK t DATE
12400
24.00
RISURFALE ;'OTORS,DRUMS
01-4140 -:3800
217.24
C%' F4kk CWP -J`T
'S -7500 -1810
10 /14; 101041+0
241.2
JPVL-CD
1010
1SLANTI FAF4' � ELLT
VENDOR TOTAL
241.24
J2533
6.60
MILE�a-Y
71-7100-2200
10/04' 10/04/
6.60
JA►!
1010
JOEL KR"
'&NDOR TOTAL
6.60
J" at5
418.00
FLmP 1NSP
01- 41 -3100
10/04/ 10/0
418.00
JRNL -CD
1010
JDM ESE I TNER
VENDCR9 TOTAL.
418.00
r
82.68
GFOA cuf
01-4090 -4110
43.80
GFOA MTGS
01-4090 -4120
101.38
GFOA COIF
01- 4095-4110
10/04/90 10/04/90
227.86
JRNL -CD
1010
J" L NOFMAN
VENDOR TOTAL
227.86
J?610
27.12
COFFEE,SUGAR
01-4280 -2200
5.89
SOAP
01- 4320-2200
36.27
GATORADE FOR FIRE
71-4110-2200
4.18
SOAP
22- 4170 -2200
10/(4/00 10/04/90
73.46
JRNL -CD
1010
JUBILEE FOODS
VENDOR TOTAL
73.46
K2652
1, 086.07
CONCRETE CI1FtB REPLACEMENTS
78- 7800 -4200
10/04/90 10,
1,086.07
JRNL-CD
1010
KAMIDA
VENDOR TOTAL
W -S.07
12748
5.45
DATES FOR STAMP
71-7100 -2200
10/04/90 10/04190
5.45
JRNL -CD
1010
L-J RUBBER STAMP COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL
5.45
127'52
192.65
SEPT GASOLINE
22-4170-2210
10/04/90 10/04/90
192.65
JRNL-CD
1010
taRArT'S SPRING PARK SPUR VENDOR TOTAL
192.65
L2770
4,110.75
LMCD-4TH ATR
01 40:' 4130
10/04/90 10/(4/00
4,110.75
JRNL-CD
LAKE WA CONSERVATION DI4 VENDOR TOTAL
4110.75
L.'�52
243.00
LMC-MAP -DIES THRU 8/91
01-4020.
10/64190 10/04/90
243.00
JRNL-CD
1010
LF*4 OF MN ClrIES•MAP Pt 'AK4)P TOTAL
243.00
•
•
•
31064
•_
UFCNASC J Cf.hA
DATE 1"'41
AF i2: 1
CITY OF MOUND
TIME 12.25.41
V"DOR INVOICE OLE HOLD
PRE -PAID CHECK
NO. INVITICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER
AMI"T CHECK t DATE
2 0 30
45.68
SEPT AUTO PARTS
01-42 -2310
5
FLOOR DRY
4-4170 -22
10104 10/04/
525.19
,1RHL-CD
1010
LOUELL S AUTCMDTI'.Ef1ITCO4 11%10 TOTAL
525.13
L2
9
TREE SERVICE
01 -4340 -5110
10/04/90 10/04/90
945,00
6JRHl, -CD
1010
LUTZ THEE SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL
995.00
K�
41.28
STETFES
01-4140-2270
10/04/ 10/04/90
41.29
JRHL -CD
1010
M.A.B. ENTERPRISES, INC. VENDOR TOTAL
41.28
"3030
5,042.00
SEPT BEER
71- 7100 -9530
10/04/ 10/04/90
5,042.00
,NfL -CD
1010
MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR VENDOR TOTAL
5042.00
M110
52.02
FITTING,REOULATOR REPAIR
01- 4140-2270
10/04/90 10/04/90
52.02
,JRHL -CD
1010
MEDICAL OXYGEN t EQUIPMENT VENDOR TOTAL
52.02
"3115
16.50
1CMA TAPES
01-4040 -2200
10/04/90 10/04190
16.50
JRML-CD
1010
O ETINGS 1NTERNAT'L, _ 0 %VW TOTAL
16.50
M3170
31,856.39
OCT SEWER SERVICES
78-7500 -4230
9,476.51 -
OCT SEWER SERVICES
78-1190-0000
477.48 -
OCT SEWER SERVICES
78 -3612 -0000
10/04/90 10/04/90
21,902.40
,JR L.-CD
1010
METRO WASTE CONTROL COMMIS AEI W TOTAL
21902.40
M3171
2,223.90
BLDG INSPECTIONS
01-4190-3100
10/04190 10/04/
2,223.90
,1RHL -CD
1010
METRO WEST INSPECTION SER+ VENDOR TOTAL
2223.90
M31P6
329.00
MATH,SPEED BOARD
22-4170-2200
10/04/40 10/04/
3
JRHL_CD
1010
MICRO AGE COMPUTER CENTER VENM TOTAL
328.00
"3207
63.44
hISC NU'YS,ETC
10/04/90 10/04/90
63.44
At -CD
14;
MIDWEST BOUT & SUPPLY VENDOR TOTAL
63.44
M3.40
29.98
OCT P';ilk Ff:N?
01- 4140-}
10 04/90 10/04/
2
r : -
1010
C
3���'
0
•
$00(,
1P CO2 ?1
CITY OF MOUND
TIME 12.25.41
1tiNrQ3 IN)OICE [If FOLD
PRE -PAID OfCK
NO. IFNOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS
0Ol1NT
CESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUTT CHECK I DATE
M'M COMM PAGING *ND(F TOTAL
2a.' '
R?Io
63.95
Sr01:E MACH L 901
2' 4170-2'70
74.20
CLEANER,LINERS
22- 4170-::70
10104.M 10/04/
118.15
Im _CD
1010
MN UINWAY FIFE 6 SAFETY VEN(Lp TOTAL.
138.15
83451
115.60
AD -DOCK INSP
81-43`.4-2200
10/04/90 10/04/90
115.60
JRK-CD
1010
MN SUBURBAN PUBLICATIUNS VENDOR TOTAL
115.60
K4470
44.00
MATER ANALYSIS
73-7300 -3100
10/04/90 10/04/90
44.00
JRK-CD
1010
MN VALLEY TESTING LABORATO VENDOR TOTAL
44.00
M3490
7,687.25
SEPT SALAkIES
22 -4170 -1390
1,167.00
SEPT MINT
22- 4170-31
627.00
SEPT DRILLS
22- 4170-1:
10/04/90 10104/90
9 ,481.25
JRK -CD
1010
HIM FIRE DEPARTMENT VE?QUR TOTAL
9481.25
Mm
5,359.00
OCT FIRE RELIEF PENSION
95-9500-1400
10/04/90 10/04/90
5,3559.00
JRK -CD
1010
MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSN VENDOR TOTAL
5359,00
0802
5,024.12
SEPT ELEC-STREET LIGHTS
01-4280 -3710
10/04/90 10/04/90
5,024.12
,IRK -CD
1010
NORTHERN STATES POWER VENDOR TOTAL
5024.11
mm
1,127.20
SUBWACE INVESTIGATION
73- 7300-4200
1,127.20
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
78- 7800-4200
10/04/90 10/04/90
2,254.40
JiM. -CD
1010
NOVA W..RONMENTAL SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL
2254.40
03
705.65
TRAP RUCK, EDGI NO, LNDERLAY
01-4320 -2200
10/04/90 10104/
705.65
JRK -CD
1010
OTTFN BF05 NIPSERY VEN:4)R TOTAL
705.65
03915
120.00
WEED CUT- ASSESS 3073 TUXEDO
01-1190-0000
10/04/ 10/04/90
1('0.00
JRK -CD
1010
OUTDOOR ENVIQpM1ENTS, INC VENDOR TOTAL
IA0.00
; 1 040
203.68
SEPT MIX
71-7100 - 9`.-40
!0/44/ 10/04/90
203.68
JRNL -CD
1010
az'SI-COI_.t C1iMPARY VE"1DC4, TOTAL
2r)?.62
0
•
$00(,
'r_L ".
Lill Ik RLMU
11ML
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
PRE -PAID DECK
N1. INVOICE NMBR WE DATE STATUS
AMOl1dT
IESCRIPIION
ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK t DATE
4n60
2,6
SEPT BEET(
71-7100-Q530
10!04/ 10/04/
2,6'
JRNL -CD
1010
POC:EBA 01571BUTING CO VENOM TOTAL
:690.36
P4!12
&". 70
cPD INS-M SCHESNVAU
71-1:f` 17000
10!04/90 10!04 /
68
JnX -CD
1010
PRCVIIOT!AL LIFE INS CO VENDOR T0
63
R4_13
221.50
REPAIR DYNASTY
01-41 -3810
10/04/90 10/04/90
2"21.50
JRNL-CD
1010
R k S COLLISION SERVICES,* VENDOR TOTAL
221.50
P4:09
104.67
SEPT GARBAGE
01-43:0-3750
10/04/ 10,04/90
104.67
JRNL -CD
1010
RANDY'S SANIIAIION VENDOR TOTAL
104.67
84280
200.00
SEPT ASST CHIEF SILARY
22- 4170-!370
10/04/90 10/04/90
200.00
JRNL-CD
1010
RONALD MARSCNCE VENDOR TOTAL
200.00
R4:90
348.71
S_ . ICE
71-7100 -9540
10/04/90 10/04/90
348.71
JRNL -CD
1010
S ICE COWANY VENDOR TOTAL
348.71
`54370
98.85
11, 12,1 HOSP-T KRAUSE
01-4280 -1510
782.07
11,12,1 HOSP -J KRAUSE
01-4280-1510
10/04/90 10/04/90
880.92
JRNL-CD
1010
SHARE VENDOR TOTAL
880.92
54403
4.00
KTG EXP
01-4020-4120
10/04/90 10/04/90
4.00
JRNL-CD
1010
SKIP JOHINSON VENDOR TOTAL
4.00
54430
933.85
NEWSLETTER
01-4020-3500
10/04/90 10/04/
933.85
'PIL -CD
1010
SOS PRINTING VENDOR TOTAL
933,85
54437
378.00
FIRE DEPT EMBLEMS
22-4170-2^200
10/04/90 10/04190
318.00
JRNL -CD
1010
SPECIALTY SCREENING VENDOR TOTAL
371.00
5
165.00
'90 MN STATUTES
01-4020 -2100
10/44/ 10/04/
165.00
JRNL-CD
1010
STAPE OF MN- CUCLMENTS VENDOR TOTAL
165.00
300
C0: O1
C11T OF MO_IIID
TIME 12.25.41
VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD
PREPAID CHECK
NO. INVi)ICE NNW @1TE DATE STATUS
Al",WT
DESZ'R1PfION
/", 'a."BER AMOUNT CHECY 1 DA'E
54580
83.28
FUSES
105,44
F£PLACE BALLAST
2":L.
IPL - CD
STEQNE ELECTRIC CO `FSTOR TOTAL
229,72
S4610
333,60
TIRES
01-
10 ()4 /°V 10m4/%
3`3.60
JRNI -CD
;tY
SL "bAN TIRE CO VENDOR TOTAL
333.60
54611
20.00
MIR SCHL REGISTR- CHENEY
73-7 -'•. -4110
10104/90 10 /04/90
20.00
JRNL-CD
1010
SURIPBAN UTILITIES SDjPT AS VENDOR TOTAL
20,00
74716
131.76
TEMP HELP
73-73640 -1300
10/041 10/04/90
131.76
JRNL-CD
1010
TEMPORARIES TO 00 VENDOR TOTAL
131.76
14730
4.8.55
SEPT LEGAL -HID BLDGS
01-4190-3510
54.29
SEPT LEGAL -CBD
01-4020 -3510
33.80
SEPT LEGAL - DENBIGH
26- 1190-0000
59.80
SEPT LEGAL-PROP ASSESS
01- 4020-3510
10/04! 10/04/90
656.44
JRNL -CD
1010
THE LAKER VENDOR TOTAL
656.44
74770
9,363.25
SEPT BEER
71-7100 -95^
10/04/90 10/04/90
9,363.25
JRNL -CD
1010
1THORPE DISTRIBUTING CO VE? f' .OTAL
9363.25
74780
41.98
FILM
1-4190-2200
46.71
FILM
22- 4170 -2200
10/04/90 10/04/90
88.69
JRNL -CD
1010
THRIFT/ WHITE DRAG STORES VENDOR TOTAL
88.69
T4810
1,161.10
TIMBERS -PARKS
60-6000 -5000
10/04/90 10/04/90
1,161.10
JRNL -,
1010
TIMBEPMALL LANDSCAPING VENDOR TOTAL
1161.10
T49N
62.52
SEPT MIX
'1-7100-9540
10/04/90 10/04/90
62.52
J#&-CD
10'0
TWIN CITY HOME JUICE CO VEND('i TOTAL
62.52
15430
1,253.12
GATE VALVES,RINGS,ETC
1-7800 -2300
1
BLACK HOSE
'3- 7300-2300
10/04190 10/04/90
1,m20
JRW -CD
1010
WATER PFDDUCTS CO!"rW VENDOR TOTAL
1409.20
•
300 8
3007
a;
p
s ,
11"1
_ E _ N A L
D l�) /U4, w,i
C0 01
CIT OF ML1 V
TIME 12.25.41
VENDOR
1 M1 CE Ill HOL D
PRE-PAID CHECK
NO. INVOICE WEIR
IWE DATE STAnn
AMOLN1 IE "R',PT!ON
ACCOJNI N11W
AMQ•NT CHECK 1 DATE
X63
11.31 PU r CTS
014340.3°00
19�n4i90 10- 4/90
1113 .3;*► -30
1010
INI SERVICES OF MN
VENDOR TOTAL
11.3,
iF '00
1,`50.0 OC �.ETAI
O1 4110 ?100
10104; %90
1,550.0 ,;*-:D
10;0
I(ikST oFAF30N- t* VENDOR TOTAL
itiT -0.01,
15;50
54.3: PIN.'_.
01 -4320 -5000
1.45 INT •112
01-4320 -6110
`x+`.31 5052 MF,I' ?
01- 4320-3800
10/04/9010/04/
6(l:.OR '0
1010
1ER01 CORPOF.AT1ON
VENDOR TOTAL
602.08
M70
182.90 V4 YES
01 -4280 -110
10/04190 10/04/90
182.90 �:_ :L
1010
KEGLER X
VENDOR TOTAL
18,90
26070
100.00 'F ?T ASST MARSHALL SALARY
22- 41701370
1 0/04/90 10/04/
100.00 • ml D
1010
MICHAEL
VENDOR TOTAL
100.00
TOTAL W l VENDORS
101,709.20
0
3007
a;
p
s ,
11"1
PLEASE SIGN AND RETIF OW COPY
C;tl[ NUM U1 DMn
1'11t1.1GCTr Kxind City Mall
CIiANOE ttRr)ER NU. 21
nATF- September 24, 1990
1"01 City of Mound IRI)JECT Nt)r_90Q &_
Is smerdonct with the 16ros of this Contrsot. the following chengtt oft sllrowsdt
Additional work required to remove asbestos material from existing facility.
EnviroBate Inc. of Wayzata was hired by the City of Mound to complete this
work and will be paid by City of Mound.
( CREDIT AMOUNT $585.00 )
J
4 p
/ l
PROJECT COST ADJUSTMENTS v I'
of 191041 ►ro)ert Costs 9 763,297.00
Prr.ioeo fhange fhdtr• It lhrs TWENTY ADD
Thin Chow Drder 11 TWENTY ONE DEDUCT
new FroJect Coots
UI rlTILSS 11pFIDW the said pones+ hair• cevoed this sgretotnt to be #•tested as of the day slid ?tot signed below.
S!iINGGSEE B UILDERS INC.
(7cont r3r t or
179 V. Mrflva !�tr-et
f'.A 11� : Sc f r
City of Mound
M aywood Ro
MN 55364
i'
r 'f1 -- -
1a C i PRO /
oATE :
Mr-Ccnbs Frank Roos Assoc. Inc.
15050 23rd Avenue North
Plymouth M. 55447
ri?�"er'M,,
CLMSE SIGN AND REM OW ODPY
C:EIAN(_1M URi3MR
I'M 1.1r. r I rt.ttvl Ck y Kil l
CIIANI;F (1t1DE11 Nu. 22
IIATF September 24, 1990
T() I Ci t y of FIoIInd
r n(viFCT 11111 - 9008__
In vrnrda" with lhr lerwo of lhip Conlrwot, the following Manger ere opprewedt
Add smoke detectors at elevator lobby on each floor. Detectors
will be wired to the F.A. panel and to the elevator call Fire
Sys( em.
F'p13JECT CrIST ADJUSTMENTS
Original rtn10r( Cnp11
I'trwln:la rhwnpr Ordrre 11 lhre TWENTY ONE
Thip rhongv IhArr 1 TWENTY TWO
Now Prolrct (note
TOTAL CHANCF. ORDER - ADD $801.00
A DD 3- ,44r7A-� - -- /C /fv
ADD 801.00
G - - - - 444 - .449 —
IA MUSS tlRFRON thr paid pntlrp haws ceunaf thlp 39rrrepnt to Ue •reculaf ae of thr day and feat 119nod leloe.
SHINCOHfE BUILDER' INC.
CoW rac't or
170 N. Medi na St reel
Addt <<
LoIv - FrN 5') 157
ItY: ��4 1
_ City of Mound
Owner
__ _ 5741 Haywood Road
Address
-MH 5 5 364
BY :
DATE:
IIA1F,; September 24,
ARCHITECT APPROVAL:
DATE : ,
FtCir ,; Frart{! Pm,, A „rx. lrK'.
1 `rYr) 23rd Averr>n flirt h
I' I , ' ItT-A tt h ! N 5'J ✓� 7
CITY COUNCIL PACKET - IQ-9 -90 #2
cFtwHCJVE C"":=
PLEASE SIGN no RE'ft/W 1M OOPY
PRrIJECT t 11 id City 11311 CIIANI;1: (IRDER NU. 23
nATF, r September 24, 1990
T01 city or tlound PROJECT NOt g0Qr
is sr"rdw" 910 the terms sl this Coeltoot. the fsllotlog Cheops pro gErowedt
Add additional valving to boiler for zone isolation
TOTAL THIS CHANCE ORDER $275.00
PROJECT COST ADJUSTMENTS ( 0
Ihlgleol trnI.ct Costs 9 7 6_3,_2_9 7 _00
Pretlese tong. Iltdere 11 this TWENTY TWO ADD
This Cheer Proler #_T_WE_NTY THREE ADD — 275.00
I.s Prot Costs — _ - - - - - -- - ---- - - - - --
it V111135 VIEW the sold Porlle" hate cooed this sgreesenl to be elicited ao of the day and ?eor sigPed below.
SIIINCOBEE BUILDERS INC.
Contractor
279 N. M edina Street _
Address
Loretto MN 55157
BY: (j`)c &
DATE: Sep tembe r 24, 1990
City
of Mound
Owner
5341
Maywood Road
Address
r
MM 55364 A
BY:
j — / \S"
DATE:
U� /C1 94
ARCHIT
APPROVAL:
BY-
DATE :
McCo+s Frank Roos Asstx. Inc.
15050 23rd Avenue North
P1 ynnuth tW 554J47
PLEA SIGN AM FZM ONE a)py
CFIANOW ORDmR
P110JECT i Mnund City Hall CHANUE ORDER NU. 29
I)ATFt October 2, 1990
TUt City of Mound PROJECT N0t_4W&_
to ORwdoace •Uh the large of this Conttnst, the Ia11etIN ehw" Sts opftove4t
To cover existing floor particle board with 1/4 plywood
TOTAL THIS ')ER $4,Coo.00
THIS WILL ADD THREE'(3) DAYS TO THE COMPLETION DATE
PROJECT COST ADJUSTMENTS
009111e1 1`1e10ct Cents
Pve.les9 ehlor of doff 11 lht9
Thie Chap► Of4er 1_ _ --
Ike Project Costs
*763,297.00
A 600.00 - - -- - r °/ / V - -- - - - - -- 9 -- L - --
11 11111 "Elmr the 9814 Pstlles have Cessed this 19:eenent to k elecohd 80 of the der end feet lived lelev.
SHINCOBEE BUILDERS INC.
Contractor
279 N. Medina Street
Address
Loretto MN 55357
r
BY: \ • . �-
DATE.: October 2, 199
City of Mound
Owner
5341 Maywood Road
Address
Mou,pd, MN J5364
BY:
DATE:
ARCHITECT APPROVAL:
BYI
DATE:
?kCaks Frank Roos Assoc. Inc.
15n`4 23rd Avenue North
Plymouth MN 55447
•
1
R00 -off
McCombs Frank Roos Ass ociates, Inc.
15050 23 A4enue Noah Plymouth. Minnesota 55347
October 8, 1990
Mr. Edward Shukle
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
SUBJECT: City of Mound, Minnesota
City Hall Addition and Remodeling
MFRA #8878
Telephone Erg ^eers
612476 -6010 Pla —ers
612 476 -8532 FAX Su
Dear Ed:
Nf 7 22
Enclosed are three copies each of Change Orders 21, 23 and 29.
Change Order 21 is a credit from Shingobee for monitoring by Envirobate of
the patching of a duct damaged by the contractor in the process of excavating
the Emergency Operations Center Room.
Change Order 22 concerns the addition of 5 smoke detectors, one at each
level in the corridor rear the elevator doors. These smoke detectors are
required for the firefighter's operation called for in the elevator
specification. The smoke detectors were inadvertently omitted from the
electrical plans. We are asking the Electrical Engineer to pay the City for
the difference between the Change Order amount and the cost of the smoke
dete -tors had they been included in the original bid. This difference is
$201.00.
Change Order 23 is for the addition of valving to each individual boiler
unit for the heating system. This is not necessary and was not included in the
original plans, so that costs could be kept to a minimum. The reason for
adding the valves is to provide zone isolation so that if one boiler needs
maintenance, the other two do not have to be shut down; therefore, the entire
building would not be without heat.
Change Order 29 concerns extra cost for installing 1/4" plywood over the
existing particle board before the carpeting is installed. The carpet supplier
will not guarantee the carpet if it is glued to the particle board. Adding
plywood is the least expensive way to provide an installation that the carpet
company will guarantee.
US.
We have reviewed these change ord( -s and recommend that they be accepted.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact
Sincerely,
•
McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Steven W. Jantzen, F.E.,, A.I.A.
SJ:aju
C l 534' MAyVC ROAf:
V ITY (..) MOUN
MOUND MiNNEJ.: A 5,
October 3, 1990
TO: Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Greg Skinner
Water & Sewer Supt.
SUBJECT: September's Activity Report
WATER DEPT.
In Septemhc -4e 21,534,000 gallons of water. There were 4 T -off's
for non -piv epaired water shut off's and also disconnected the
water .e for 2142 Belmont Ln. We completed the Beachwood
wat�. We installed 4 new services that were not put in
b hat the water treatment plant is on hold for awhile
1. ? 1 ,, i r #6.
Thy `,ewer C•at. has bren working on sewer line maintenance. Our lift station
projeLL was started this month. The piping for the by -pass pumping has been
completed.
•
•
0 AL
CITY o N IOL'N
October 3, 1990
TO: Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Greg Bergquist
Mechanic
^_ ".7d• �.5:, " - x.10 ROAD
SUBJECT: September's Activity Report
This month Police repairs were:
841 - 89 Pontiac needed rear brakes and service
840 - 90 Pontiac - service and shotgun rack repair
843 - 90 Pontiac - front brakes, rotors resurfaced and service
844 - 87 Chev. - headlight repair, right rear door repair, broken light
bar, 4 new tires, front brakes and window control unit.
845 - 88 Baretta - service
846 - Chief's Car - service
STREET REPAI
Unit #8 - LN 8000 Ford Dump Truck - repaired left front flat tire,
fuel line leak and clutch adjustment.
Unit #4 - LN 8000 Ford Dump - service including bride adjustment, 16 Qts
of 15W -40, 2 oil filters, air filters, fuel filters.
We built a rack on the air compressor to keep the jack hammer hoses from
being damaged. We also built sign holders for the Street Dept. to hold Fresh
Oil signs.
WAT & SEWER
Unit #16 - 75 LN 8000 Ford Dump - passenger window repair.
The Sewer cleaning jet machine needed a carburetor rebuild, tune -up,
coil, resistor and battery.
• SHOP
PARKS
SHOP
1971 Ford 2000 Tractor - repaired right side power steering cylinder
and worn out cycle bar.
Bobcat - repaired 2 bobcat teeth and built and installed and edging tooth.
Unit #7 - 78 Chev, pickup - installed 4 shocks
•
•
301A
CITY Of 1 IOU ND cM►aiN%t S- noAC
October 3, 1990
TO: Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Geno Hoff
Street Supt.
SUBJECT: September's Activity Report
We did some curb and gutter work for a few days the first part of the
• month. We removed about 45' of curb and 1 driveway apron. We had Kamida
Construction Co. do the cement work.
We've been busy this month trying to finish our street patching. We did
alot of crack patching and overlaying of streets that are slated for
sealcoating next year. We also patched 4 gate valves that had to be dug
up and a watermain break on Three Points Blvd. Our oiler is put away
for the year and the only patching that will be done will be because of an
emergency.
We had the Vac -all out the 17th cleaning some more sump catch basins. The
13th we started sweeping the residential streets, we swept 4 days and did
about a third of the town.
SIGN WORK
Replaced 3 stop, 3 No Parking, 1 Dead End and 6 street name signs, also
replaced 6 new posts (top & bottoms).
CEMETERY
Staked out 2 graves and 2 stones. Hauled :n 6 loads of bl.+ck dirt from
Mayer and cleaned up the dump area.
. 303
plouLd. liinnc6ota
MMn FIRE DIPARTMD]►T FOR 1401.$ OF SF.PMMR 1990
FIRE HOMERS
J. ANDERSEN
.L RAFR
DRILLS i XAI1MMC! .
W BM DRILL MAIN.
VAGES WAGES
.00 0 8
X X 2 19.00 2 8
X X 2 19.00 0 5
FM i RESCUR
MAL HO4HtIx
HOURS RATC war-
37 6.00 222,
36 6.410 216.00
51 306,00
D. BOYD
X
X
2
19.00
2 5h
31
6
186,00
- n_ BRYCF
X
X
2
19.00
0 7k
56
6,5,-
364.00
S. BRICE
X
X
2
19.00
0 3
26
6,00
6.00
1%
156.00
192.00
D. CARLSON
X
X
2
19.00
2k 6
J. CASEY
19
2 2h
34
X
X
2
19.00
1% 4
33
6.00
198.00
M- pAVM
X
X
2
19.00
7 3
30
6.00
180.00
R. ElGELHW
S. ERICKSON
x
X
2
19,00
2
2 4
41
6.00
ZQ4.OG
246.00
P- FUM
X
X
2
19.00
6.
38
6.00
228.00
.;. GARV "'
X
X
2
19.00
p
36
6.00
216.00
2
19-OD
3 4
6.00
270.00
X
X
2
19.00
4 3
37
222,00
P. FDA'RY
X
X
2
19.00
2 6
34
6.00
204
G.
0 0
6.00
..0_
B. LANWAN
` MA '�'�
J. NAFUS
X
X
X
X
2
2
1
19.00
X9.00
9.50
21 A
p 7
2 A
29
37
38
6.90
6.25
6.09
174.
231.2
228.00
M. NELS0N
X
X
2
19.00
34
6.00
204.00
B. NI
X
X
2
19.00
3 4
34
6.00
204.00
A. OPITZ
4 S
-
3
6 . 0 0
210.00
G. Pte[
X
1
9.50
A
36
6.00
.00
H. PAIlI
X
X
2
19.00
A
38
6.00
.00
T. PALM
X
X
2
19.00
2 5
46
6.00
.00
G. PEDERSON
X
X
2
19.00
2 5
36
6.00
.00
T. RASNUSSEN-
X
X
2
19.00
2
34
6.00
.00
M. SAVAGE
X
X
2
19.00
7k 4
42
.00
[270.00
K. SIPPRELL
X
X
2
19.00
5k
55
6.00
.00
X
X
2
9.00
y 4k
31
6.00
.00
T. SWENSON
2 5
6.00
W. SWENSON
0
-0'
0
32
6.00
2.00
R. WILLIMLS
X
X
2
9.00
ly 1
45
6.00
T. WILLIAMS
X
X
2
9.00
p 8
21
126.00
6.00
32
80 HR
34
66
165 1LLtS
527.00
801
E - 144
1275
DRILLS
MAIM
7687
627.
1 1167.00
• MAL
19481.25
3o1y
THIS LAS THIS YEAR LAS YEAR
MONTH OF SEP fQ4 1 Eit 1 990 MONTH MONTH TA eATV TA RATC
4w
•
•
NO. OF CALLS
S3
29
368
286 -
MOUND - FIRE
EMERGENCY
22
10
80
59
20
9
136
110
M'TONKA BEACH - FIRE
EMERGENCY
0
1
li
10
1
0
2
1
MINNETRISTA - FIRE
EMERGENCY
2
25
14
5
0
28
13
ORONO - FIRE
EMERGENCY
0
3
25
33
1
0
10
5
SHOREWOOD - FIRE
EMERGENCY
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
SPRING PARK - FIRE
EMERGENCY
2
3
22
2'
2
1
26
17
MUTUAL AID - FIRE
EMERGENCY
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
TOTAL FIRE CALLS
TOTAL EMERGENCY CALLS
10
165
203
139
147
COMMERICAL
3
1
12
13
RESIDENTIAL
8
6
64
54
INDUSTRIAL
0
0
2
5
GRASS a MISCELLANEOUS
7
7
52
37
AUTO
0
2
13
19
FALSE ALARM
3
20
10
NO. OF HOURS - MOUND FIRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
- MTKA BCH FIRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
- M'TRISTA FIRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
- ORONO FIRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
- SHOREWOOD FIRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
-SP. PARK FIRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
-MUTUAL AID FIRE
EMERGENCY
TOTAL
TOTAL DRILL HOURS
648
203 -
2081
1198
387
160"
2562
1997
1035
363
4643
3195
21
n
21
11
3an
309
0
29
565
422
118
0
592
246
118
29
1157
668
0
43
695
979
16
0
198
98
4
3
1077
0
0
0
21
0
0
12
13
0
0
12
34
45
67
575
41^
40
8
502
278
85
75
1077
697
0
0
91
87
0
0
0
0
165
157;
1499
1450
TOTAL EVERGEIICY HOURS
582
168
3901
2643
TOTAL FIRE HOURS
693
353
3424 %WW
TOTAL FIRE 6 EME RGENCY HOURS
1275
521
r8173
6067
- yin or -ri
D R I L L R E P O R T
MOUND FIRE DEPTARTMENT
�.'c7C1 A AA Date
CO
Discipline and Teamwork
Critique of fires
Pre -plan and Inspections
Tools and Apparatus Identify
Hand Extinguisher Operation
Wearing Protective Clothing
Films
First aid and Rescue Operation
Use of Self- Contained Masks
X -
Pumper Operation
Fire Streams b Friction Loss
House Burnings
Natural /Propane Gas demos.
Ladder Evolutions
Salvage Operations
Radio Operations
House Evolutions
Nozzles & Hose Alliance
Hours Training Paid
® Excused X Unexecused O Present / Not Paid
Miscellaneous
P E R S O N N E L
1 /1- J.Andersen P.Fisk - � G.Pa;m
Z G.Anderson J.Garvais ''/L M.Palm
ZTVJ.Babb ;T K.Grady TVZ�T.Pa1m
2 VT D.Boyd ?'%C.Henderson 2— T - G.Pederson
!
0 D.Bryce ' _ P.Henry .7 T.Rassmusen
S.Bryce — X - G.Johnson ; ,77 7T M.Savage
/2- D.CarIson ."' / 1 '2 K.Sipprell
2 YJ.casey 2'z R.Marschke ?'/t R.Stallman
I r TS.CoITins ?' /z J.Nafus 2 it T.Swensot,
T M.David 1 =/ M.Nelson W.Swenson
^ R.Englehart --27.—X B.Niccum i /2- R.Williams
A'/+- S.Erickson �'�,? A.Opitz 'izT.Williams
301
HOUND VOLUNTEER EM DENT
MOUND, MINNESOTA
D R I L L R E P O R T
• Date: �- / 7 � 0
Tim
T ime
Discipline and Team work
Pumper Operation
Critique of Fires
Fire Streams i Friction
a//
Loss
Pre - Plaining and Inspections
House Burnings
Tools i Apparatus
Natural i Propane Gas
Identifying
talk & Demonstrations
Hand Extinguisher operation
Ladder Evolutions
Wearing Protective Clothing
Salvage Operations
Films
Radio Operations
First Aid and Rescue
House Evolutions
operation
Nozzle i Hose Alliance
Use of Self- Contained Masks
Inhalator Operation
Note: Ho a Training Paid
W Excused $ Unexcused Q Present, Not paid
Miscellaneous: T. C,4sey A 94Lce ` ;�Pd Ge 1,; - t J 7 1 ;114 ( ch a'3'9p
J,/yy c
t, sea Ree; d y e C:p�,f Cnf4:w.e(� r :j '
•
3011
J.
G.
Andersen
Anderson
S.
Erickson
a//
M.
A:
Nelson
Opitz
/
J.
Babb
P.
Fisk
G.
Palm
D.
Boyd
)v
J.
Garvais
Ii
M.
Palm -
D.
Bryce
_
K.
Grady
a' /...
T.
Palm
S.
Bryce
P.
Henry
G.
Pederson
2i/,x
D.
Carlson..
C.
Henderson
T.
Rasmussen
J.
Casey
G.
Johnson
M.
Savage
�
S.
Collins
/}.
B.
Landsman
K.
Sipprell
M.
David
_;Z
_221j-
R.
Marschke
�
R.
Stallman
R.
Engelhart
J.
Nafus
i
T.
Swenson
B.
Niccum
W.
Swenson
R.
Williams
!Y
D ill ter
•
3011
DATE OCr. i, 19 90
MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT
n .
TOTAL MAINTENANCE FOR MONTH OF EPr• 90
MEN ON DUTY
J.
ANDERSEN
.2-
J.
NAFUS
.Z
G.
ANDERSON
M.
NELSON
0
J.
BARB
3
B.
NICCUM
.2
D.
BOYD
A.
OPITZ
O
D.
BRYCE
D
G.
PALM
O
S.
BRYCE
M.
PALM
D.
CARLSON
T.
PAIR
!�
J.
CASEY
oZ
G.
PEDERSON
S.
COLLINS
.2-
T.
RASMUSSEN
02
M.
DAVID
'f
ti.
SAVAGE
.2
R.
ENGELMRT
o2
K.
SIPPRE'Ll
�-
S.
ERICKSON
R.
STALdMAN
-
P.
FISK
_
T.
S'WWON
O
J.
GARVAIS
_L_
W.
SWOON
3
K.
QMY
/y
R.
WILLIAMS
_
C.
HEDERSON
O
T.
WILLIAILS
.2
P.
HENRY
D
G.
JOHNSON
B.
LANDSMAN
O
R.
MARSQKE
TOTAL MONTHLY
D L
HOURS
d
3018
----------=---------------------------------
TOTAL
9/20
: 9/24
:9/26
- - -
- -;
JEFF
::
8.0
3.0
: 3.5
: 1.5 ;
SOLI
GREG
::
8.5
::
3.0
: 3.5
: 2 ;
GERALD
::
5.0
::
2.5
: 2.5
BOYD
DAVID
::
5.5
::
: 5.5
;
BRYCE
DON
::
7.5
:;
2.5
3.5
: 1.5 ;
BRYCE
SCOTT
::
3.5
:;
3.5
CARLSON
DAVID
:;
6.0
::
2.5
3.5
;
CASEY
JIM
::
2.5
:;
; 2.5
;
COLLINS
STEVE
::
4.0
:;
: 3.0
: 1 ;
DAVID
MIKE
::
3.5
:;
2.5
: 1 ;
ENGELHART
RANDY
:;
3.5
::
: 2.0
: 1.5 ,
ERICKSON
STEVE
::
4.0
::
: 2.5
1.5 ;
FISK
PHILIP
::
6.0
:;
3.0
3.0
;
GARVAIS
GERALD
::
3.5
;:
; 2.5
; 1 ;
GRADY
KEVIN
::
4.5
::
2.0
; 2.5
;
HENDERSON
CRAIG
::
3.0
::
: 3.0
;
HENRY
PAUL
::
6.0
:;
2.5
3.5
;
JOHNSON
GREG
;;
low
is
LANDSMAN
BRAD
;:
3.5
::
; 2.5
1 ;
RSCHKE
RON
;:
7.5
::
2.5
3.5
1.5
FUS
JOHN
::
3.5
::
3.5
;
NELSON
MARV
:;
3.5
:;
; 2.5
; 1
NICCUM
BRET
:;
4.0
3.0
; 1
OPITZ
BUD
::
5.0
:;
: 3.5
; 1.5 ;
PALM
GREG
;:
4.5
;;
3.5
; 1 ;
PALM
MIKE
::
2.5
;;
; 2.5
PALM
TIM
;;
5.5
;;
2.0
3.5
;
PEDERSON
GREG
;;
5.0
;;
2.5
; 2.5
;
RASMUSSEN
TONY
::
4.0
2.5
; 1.5 ;
SAV:,GE
MIKE
;;
4.5
;;
2.0
2.5
SIPPRELL
KEVIN
;:
5.5
;;
2.0
3.0
; 0.5 ;
STALLMAN
RON
;;
4.5
;;
3.5
; 1
SWENSON
BILL
;;
0.0
SWENSON
TOM
:;
5.0
2.5
2.5
WILLIAMS
RICK
;;
3.5
;;
2.5
1
WILLIAMS
TIM
;
8.0
3.0
3.5
1.5
TOTALS -
;LJY.O
40.0
100.5
:0.5
•
3019
3
MOUND POLICE
5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472.3711 `
Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 5449511
3
U+ NAaELL EMERGENCY 911
chiN of Polite
TO: Ed Shukle
FROM: Len Harrell
SUBJECT: Monthly Report for September, 1990
I. STATISTICS
The police department responded to 793 calls for serv-
ice during the month of September.' There were 36
Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 2
criminal sexual conduct, 6 burglaries, 24 larcenies, 2
vehicle thefts, and 2 arsons.
There were 69 Part II offenses reported. Those of-
fenses included 5 child abuse /neglect, 10 criminal
damage to property, 1 weapon violation, 3 narcotic
violations, 13 liquor law violations, 12 DWI's, 3 as-
saults, 3 domestic assaults, 10 harassment, 6 juvenile
status offenses, and 3 other offenses.
The patrol division issued 126. adult citations and 5
juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for
an additional 9 tickets. Warnings were issued to 35
individuals for a variety of violations.
There were 2 adults arrested for felonies and one
juvenile arrested for a felony. There were 36 adult
misdemeanor arrests and 16 juvenile misdemeanor ar-
rests. There were 10 additional warrant arrests.
The department assisted in 9 vehicular accidents, one
with injuries. There were 37 medical emergencies and
57 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies on
17 occasions in September and requested assistance 8
times.
Property valued at $20,915 was stolen and $7,423 was
recovered in September.
1
0
300
•
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT - SEPTEMBER, 1990
II. INVESTIGATION
The investigators worked on 7 child protection cases
and a criminal sexual conduct case in September. These
10 cases accounted for 43.5 hours of investigative
time. In addition, cases involving AGG DWI, hit & run
accident, theft, narcotics, burglary, arson, NSF
checks, assault, damage to property, and truancy were
investigated.
Formal complaints were issued for careless driving and
no insurance, tax evasion, fleeing a police officer and
DWI, and grDss misdemeanor DWI's.
III. Personnel /Staffing
The department used approximately 45 hours of over -time
during the month of September. Officers used 55 hours
of comp -time and earned 39 hours of comp -time. There
was 50 hours of vacation, 11 holidays and 37 hours of
sick time used.
IV. Training
Officers attended 18 days of training during the month
of September. Two officers attended "field sobriety,"
four officers attended "vehicle driving & pursuit," and
there was a one day school on vehicle restraints and
use of air bags.
Officer Huggett and "Rambo" attended nine days of
canine training and received their PDQ certificate
through the United States Police CAnine Assn.
IV. Police Reserves
The police reserves donated 136 hours of time during
the month of September.
2
3042/
L`
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT
SEPTEMBER, 1990
THIS
GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY MONTE
Hazardous Citations
81
Non - Hazardous Citations
30
Hazardous Warnings
4
Non - Hazardous Warnings
23
Verbal Warnings
92
Parking Citations
9
DWI
12
Over .10
8
Property Damage Accidents
8
Personal Injury Accidents
1
Fatal Accidents
0
Adult Felony Arrests
2
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests
24
Adult Misdemeanor Citations
22
Juvenile Felony Arrests
1
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests
12
Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations
4
Part I Offenses
36
Part II Offenses
69
Medicals
37
Animmal Complaints
57
Other Public Contacts
560
TOTAL 1,092
Assists 52
Follow -Ups 10
Henn. County Child Protection 6
Mutual Aid Given 17
Mutual Aid Requested 8
0
1 0
3010%
TOTAL 36 1 1 3 2 1
PART 11 CRIMES
Property Damage Accidents
8
SEPTEMBER
1990
Child Abuse /Neglect
5
1
OFFENSES
CLEARED
EXCEPT.
CLEARED BY
ARRESTED
0
0
REPORTED
UNFOUNDED
CLEARED
ARREST
ADULT JUVENILE
1
PART I CRIMES
2 1
Weapons
1
0
0
1
Nomicide
0
0
0
0
0 0
3 0
Criminal Sexual Conduct
2
0
1
0
0 0
DWI
Rory
0
0
0
0
0 0
3
Aggravated Assault
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
Burglary
6
0
0
0
0 0
0
Larceny
24
0
0
3
2 1
0
Vehicle Theft
2
1
0
0
0 0
0 8
Arson
2
0
0
0
0 0
TOTAL 36 1 1 3 2 1
PART 11 CRIMES
Property Damage Accidents
8
Personal Injury Accidents
1
Child Abuse /Neglect
5
1
4
0
0 0
Forgery/NSF Checks
0
0
0
0
0 0
Criminal Damage to Property
10
0
1
0
2 1
Weapons
1
0
0
1
0 2
Narcotics
3
0
0
3
3 0
Liquor laws
13
1
0
12
16 4
DWI
12
0
0
12
11 1
Simple Assault
3
0
1
1
1 0
Domestic Assault
3
0
2
0
0 0
Domestic (No Assault)
0
0
0
0
0 0
Harassment
10
0
0
0
0 0
Juvenile Status Offenses
6
0
1
4
0 8
Public Peace
1
0
0
1
1 0
Trespassing
0
0
0
0
0 0
All Other Offenses
2
0
0
2
2 0
TOTAL 69 2 9 36 36 16
PART III i PART 1V
Property Damage Accidents
8
Personal Injury Accidents
1
Fatal Accidents
0
Medicate
37
Animal Cwplaints
57
Mutual Aid
17
Other General Investigations
560
TOTAL 680
Nenrwpin County Child Protection 6
CHIPS 0
TOTAL 791 3 10 39 36 17
0
1
1023
XONTHLY PROPERTY LOSS /RECOVERY SUMMARY
SEPTEMBER, 1990
Bikes
Snowmobiles
Boats, Motors, Trailers
Clothing
Currency, Notes, Etc.
Jewelry & Precious Metals
Guns
Home Furnishings
Radio & Electronic Equipment
Vehicles & Vehicle Equipment
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
1
STOLEN RECOVERED
$ 265
$ 0
0
0
0
0
534
55
4,239
0
609
0
287
287
75
0
3,186
30
8,690
7,000
3,030
51
$20,915
$ 7,423
•
r �
L�
•
3024
1 0 :2S'
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY
REPORT
SEPTEMBER, 1990
CITATIONS
bA ULT
LO
DWI
11
1
More than .10% BAC
8
0
Careless /Reckless Driving
0
0
Driving After Susp. or Rev.
5
0
Open Bottle
0
0
Speeding
50
4
No DL or Expired DL
2
0
Restriction on DL
0
0
Improper, Expired, or No Plates
24
0
Illegal Passing
0
0
Stop Sign Violations
9
0
Failure to Yield
1
1
Equipment Violations
0
0
H &R Leaving the Scene
1
0
No Insurance
1
0
Illegal or Unsafe Turn
0
0
C-er the Centerline
0
0
Parking Violations
9
0
Crosswalk
3
0
Dog Ordinances
0
0
Derelict Autos
0
0
Seat Best
5
0
MV /ATV
1
0
Miscellaneous Tags
g
0
TOTAL
135
5
1 0 :2S'
MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT i s
SEPTEMBER, 1990
WARNINGS
ADULT
JW
No Insurance
7
2
Traffic
2
0
Equipment
9
1
Crosswalk
1
0
Animals
1
0
Trash /Derelict Autos
11
0
Seat Belt
0
0
Trespassing
0
0
Miscellaneous
1
0
TOTAL
32
3
ARRESTS
Felony Warrants
0
0
Misdemeanor Warrants
10
0
•
30014
RUN: 2 -MT -90
W I11R1
USN S ONLY_ NO
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL
ACT
':ODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
?9000
SPEEDING
19001
J- SPEEDING
)9002
NO D /L, EXPIRED D/L
:)9006
TEST REFUSAL.
)9010
BAC OVER .10
09014
STOP SIGN
')9016
FAILURE TO YIELD
*- FAILURE TO YIELD
09022
EXHIBITION DRIV.
09030
CROSSNALK VIOLATION
09033
MV /ATV STREETS-PARKS
09040
NO SEATBELT
)9100
PARKING /ALL OTHER
.19200
DAS /DAR /DAC
-19210
PLATES /NO- IMPROPER - EXPIRED
09220
NO IMARMM /PROOF OF
, )9300
LOST ARTICLES/OTHER
)9309
FOUND /RIItAN:IY
09312
FOX ANIMALS/ IMNOUNDS
FOUND PROPERTY
FOUND VEHICLES /IMPOIIwIDEO
)9430 PERSONAL. INJURY ACCIDENTS
, )9450 PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS
INSTALLATION NAME -- NOIND POLICE OEPARTPW PAGE 1
tttttt
ENF0RS
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
00/26/90 THRU 09/25/90
-- - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS---------- -
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL
10 11
4
16 9
1
2
1
1
1
1 1
3
1 5
2
3
2 1
1 2
4
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1 1
3
1 5
1 1
2 1
2 3
9
4 6
1
1
1
1 1 2 1
4 1 2
1
1
1 2 1 1
1
50
4
2
3
8
4
1
l
1
3
1
5
9
5
24
1
1
1
5
8
1
5 3ct7
RUN: 2 -MT -90 INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 2
CFS03 tttttt
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
08/26/90 THRU 09/25/90
ACT
- - -
- - - - -
- - - PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - -
-
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
10
20
30
40
50 60 70 80 90
TOTAL
09451 H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC.
1
1
1
3
09452 H L R ACCIDEFTS W /TICKET
1
1
09500 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE ACC/OTHER
1
1
09561 DOG BITE
1
1
09563 DOG AT LARGE
1
I
ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS
1
1
09710 ATTEMPTED SUICIDE
3
1
4
•
09720 SUDDEN DEATHS /BODIES FOI,ND
1
1
09730 MEDICALS
4
3
5
6
9 1
28
09731 DETOX-MEDICALS
1
2
1
1
5
09732 CRISIS 1NT.- MEDICALS
I
1
2
4
09750 FIRES
1
1
2
09800 ALL OTHER /UNCLASSIFIED
1
1
05900 ALL HCCP CASES
1
2
3
6
09904 OPEN DOOR /ALARMIS
1
1
1
3
09920 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT
1
1
09930 HANDGUN APPLICATION
1
3
1
5
09943 PROWLER
1
1
2
09950 INTELLIGENCE
1
1
09980 WARRANTS
0
5
2
3
10
09992 MUTUAL AID /8100
12
12
09993 !MUTUAL AID /6500
1
2 2
5
3o9,1c
RUN* 2 -MT -90 INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE
3
r^R ISN'S ONLY? NO
E N F 0 R S
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL
CANS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
08/26/90 THRU 09/25/90
+CT
- - - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - -
-
Dff ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
TOTAL
-5352 ASLT 5- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- HANDS-ADLT -ACQ
1 1
2
5353 ASLT 5- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- HANDS-ADLT -STR
1
I
15501 ASLT 5 -THRT BODILY HARM -UW NEAP- ADLT -FAM
1
I
:5544 ASLT 5-THRT BODILY HARM -0TH NEAP - CHID -FAM
1
1
034 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC -D -UW iEAP-COI THEFT
1
1
33364 BURG 3-UN000 RES FRC -N -UW NEAP-CON THEFT
2
2
33394 BURG 3-INOCC RES FRL-U-UW NEAP -CON THEFT
i
I
3�BURG 3 -UNOCC RES NO FRC-D -UW LEAP -COM THEFT
1
I
33464 BURG 3-UN000 RES NO FRC -N -UW NEAP -COJ THEFT
1
1
]8500 DRUGS -SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA- POSSESSION
1
I-
: ESC-GM -FLEE AN OFFICER
1 1
2
F1123 ARSON 1-INHAB-N0 NEA -OT RESID-$2500-09"
1
1
=4005 ARSON 3-MS-UW COND -OT PROP-6299 LESS
1
1
13060 CRIM AGNST FAM-MS- NEGLECT OF A CHILD
2 2
4
J2500 TRAFFIC-GM-ORIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
1 1
2
J2700 TRAF- ACCID-GM- AGGRAVATED VIOLATION
1 2
3
J3500 TRAF-ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
2 4 1
7
X1121 CSC 1 -NO FRC- PARENT -UNDER 13-F
1
1
-3021 CSC 2-UW ACT- PARENT -UNDER 13-F
I
I
JUVENILE- ALCOHOL OFFENTO
LIQUOR - OTHER
1 3
1 2 5 1
4
9
45313 JUVENILE- CURFDi
1 1 2
4
pm RUNAWAY
I
I
���:
RUN:
2 -MT -90 INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE
4
CFS03
i • i f t ;
PRIMARY 1SN'S ONLY? NO
E N F 0 R S
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL
CALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL
AREA
08/26/90 THRU 09/25/90
ACT
- - - - - - - - -
- - PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - - -
CODE
ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
10 20 30
40 50 60 70 80 %
TOTAL
,15355
INCORRIGIBLE
t
I
76501
DRUG PARAFrEM1ALIA- POSSESSION
!
1
2
13060
DISTURB PEACE- MS-CONCEALING IDENTITY
1
1
13190
DISTURB PEACE- MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
1 6
1
8
03881
OBSENITY- MS-OBSCEME PHONE CALL-MINOR
1
I
L1W
OBSENITY- MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-AU LT
1
1
F2120
PROP DAMAGE-OM- PUBLIC -LO INTENT
1
1
P3110
FROP DAMAGE-MS-PRIVATE-LW INTENT
2 3
1 1
7
P3120
PROP DAMAGE-MS-PUBLIC -LW INTUff
!
1
2
T0021
THEFT -LW LVL VAL-FRM BUILDING-MONEY
1
1
T1021
THEFT -MORE 62500- FE-FRH BUILDING -MONEY
1
1
T2155
THEFT - 251- 2500- FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-FIREARMS
1
1
T2159
THEFT - 6251- $2500-FE -FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP
1 2
3
T4021
THEFT4250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-MONEY
1
t
14029
THEFT4250 LESS- MS -FRM BUILDING -0TH PROP
1
1
T4059
THEFT-6250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS -0TH PROP
1
1
74150
THEFT -6250 LESS- MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-LW PROP
1
14159
THEFT -6250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE -0TH PROP
3 1
4
8
T4169
THEFT4250 LESS--MS -FRM WATERCRAFT -0TH PROP
1
1
2
13'[88
THEFT- MIS-SHOPLIFTING - 6200 OR LESS
2
2
4
11021
VEH THEFT -FE -OVER 62500 -AUTO
i
i
•
/2020
VEH THEFT- FE- 251-2500-OTHER VEH- MOTORIZED
t
t
tn4m
WFAPnNS- MIS -nTHFR Af.T- FIRFWnRkS -WI rW
303o
V -OCT -90 INSTALLATION WE -- MIOJND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 5
CFS03 tiff•#
NIM1ARr ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL :ALLS FOR SERVICE
ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA
08/26/90 THRU 09/25/90
ACT - - - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - - -
CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL
REPORT TOTALS:
•
55 37 105 63 73 2 2 12 3 352
,303/
RW 2 -MT -90 INSTALLATION WE -- SM POLICE DEPARTMENT
OFFOI ; ; ;
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S
DISFOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 08/26/90 THR11 09/25/90
/---------- - - - - -- OFFENSES CLEARED -- ---------- - - - - -/
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL - - - -BY ARREST - - -- BY TOTAL PEACENI
DESCRIPTION REPORTED MOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADLLT &lVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A5351 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 100.0
ASLT 5- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRN-HANDS- AOLT -FAM
A5352 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 2 100.0
ASLT S- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- HANDS- ADLT -AC9
AM 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- HAWDS-AOLT -STR
A5501 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
ASLT S-THRT BODILY HARM -LW NEAP- ADLT -FAM
A5544 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
AM S-THRT BODILY HARM-OTH NEAP- DU -FAM 0
B3334 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
KM 3-LlNOCC RES FRC -D -LW AEA' -COM THEFT
53364 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0
KK 3-1XIOCC RES FRC -N -LW NEAP -COM THEFT
63394 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 ,p
RXtG 3 RES FRC- U-L1wIC HEAP -COM THEFT
itA34 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 ,0
KA 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC -D -LW NEAP -COM THEFT
K464 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
EILS 3-UNOCC RES NO FRv -N-LW NEAP -CON THEFT
D6500 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 l 100.0
DRUGS -SMALL AMOUNT MARI,uANA- POSSESSION
E4700 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 100.0
ESC-0441E AN OFFICER
F1123 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
ARSON 1-INH0-NO NEA -OT RESID- 5250049999
FM 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
ARSON 3-MS-UNK COND-OT PROP 4299 LESS
,3064 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 100.0
_+;V FAM -MS- NEGLECT I F 4 C�'LD
no 2_0CT
INSTALLATION NAME -- QM POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE 2
MOT isws aLr MD
E N F 0 R S
019WTIa1 CM ALL
ACTIVITY Mm ALL
OFFENSE ACTIVITY
BY DISPOSITION
atID: ALL
06/26/90 THAU
09/25/90
/----------
- - - - -- OFFENSES
CLEARED
------------ - - - - -/
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES
ACTUAL
----BY ARREST - ---
BY
TOTAL
PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNFOUNDED
OFFENSES
PENDING
ADULT
JUVENILE
EXCEPTION
CLEARED
CLEARED
J25M
2
0
2
0
2
0
0
2
100.0
TRAFFIC- GM-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR
J2700
3
0
3
0
3
0
0
3
100.0
TRAF- ACCID -GM- AGGRAVATED VIOLATION
J35M
7
0
7
0
6
1
0
7
100.0
TRAF- ACCID -MS -DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF
LIQUOR
L1121
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
100.0
CSC i -NO FRC-PNM-LIM i34
MUNK ACT- PARENT -UNDER 13 -F
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
M3001
4
1
3
0
0
3
0
3
100.0
JUVENILE-ALIM OFFENDER
M4199
9
0
9
0
9
0
0
9
100.0
LIQUOR - :it'R
M5313
4
0
4
0
0
4
0
4
100.0
JUVENILE- CURFEII
M5350
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
RUNAWAY
M5m
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
100.0
INCORRIGIBLE
m6wl
2
0
2
0
2
0
0
2
1C^.0
DRUF PARAPHERNALIA- POSSESSION
N3060
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
100.0
DISTURB PEACE-MS- CONCEALING IDENTITY
ulum
7
0
7
0
0
0
0
.G
PEACE- MS- NARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS
0
035331
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
OPSEIIITY -MS -OBSCENE PHONE CALL-MINOR
"�
O X32
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
: ?TT m; - rc4rcr;: mootc r0'i-A! "t'
RUN: 2-MT -90 INSTALLATION WE -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT
PAGE
3
OFFO1
t••rtt
0 ,
PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO
E N F 0
R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL
OFFENSE ACTIVITY
BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL
08/26190 THRU
09/25/90
/----------
- - - - -- OFFENSES CLEARED -------------
--- -/
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES
ACTUAL
----BY ARREST - - --
BY
TOTAL
PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED LIFOLWDED
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFENSES
PENDING
ADULT
JLMILE
EXCEPTION
CLEARED
CLEAta
x2120 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
PROP OAMAGE-GM-PUBLIC-LW INTENT
F3110 7
0
7
6
0
0
1
1
14.2
PROP DAMAGE-MS- PRIVATE -UW INTENT
P3120 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
PROP DAMAGE- MS- PUBLIC-UW INTENT
T1021 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT -MORE $2500 -FE -Flat BUILDING -MONEY
T2155 1
THEFT- 251- 2500- FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE- FIREARMS
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
100.9
T2159 3
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT-6251-62500- FE -FRM MOTOR VEHICLE -0TH PROP
T4021 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT4250 LESS- MS -FRM BUILDING -M ONE v
T4029 1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT4250 LESS- MS -FRM BUILDING -0TH PROP
T4059 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT -6250 LESS-MS -FRM YARDS -0TH PROP
T4150 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT -1250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE -UW PROP
T4159 7
0
7
7
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT -6250 LESS- MS -FRM MOTOR VEHICLE -0TH PROP
T4169 2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
.0
THEFT4250 LESS- MS -FRM WATERCRAFT -0TH PROP
U328L; 4
0
4
2
2
0
0
2
50.0
THEFT MIS-SHOPLIFTING - 6200 OR LESS
9
V1021 1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.0
VEH THEFT -FE -OVER 62500 -AUTO
V2020 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0
THEFT- FE-2 `A
51-2-OTHER VEH- MOTORIZED
eIt V
RUN.' 2- OCT••90 INSTALLATION NAIE -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTIENT PAGE 4
f f f f i f
Y ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F O R S
DISPOSITION CODES: ALL
ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION
GRID: ALL 08/26/90 TH2U 09/25/90
/---------- - - - - -- OFFENSES CLEARED ------------ - - - - -/
ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL - - - -BY ARTIEST -- -- BY TOTAL PERCENT
DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JIVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
W398O 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0
WEAPONS- MS-OTHER ACT FIRENOWCS -NO CHAR
REPORT TOTALS - 101 3 98 49 29 10 10 49 50.0
U
,3a3s
0 / 11
CITY(A NIOL"NI)
October 3, 1990
TO: Ed Shukle
City Manager
FROM: Joyce
Recycling Coordinator
SUBJECT: September's Recycling
The Joint Powers meeting with Hennepin County and 13 other cities is
• coming along. Hennepin County has written the Re -;nest For Proposal
and we will be meeting with the haulers on October 15th. The purpose
of this meeting is to find out if they are interested and how they
feel about servicing this big of an area and any problems they may forsee.
Bids for the RFP will be due in early November so that a decision can
be made and contracts signed by late November or early December.
As you all know we had a winner in September for our Recyclotto, Tom
and Phyllis Helget at 2939 Dickens Ln. won 350 Westonka Dollars. I
had talked to Phyllis this week and she said everyone was very willing
to accept them.
September tonnage was 51.47 with 5,429 households participating or
55% of the homes.
•
"ITY(A N KA "NI)
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
October 4, 1990
City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff
Jon Sutherland, Building Official��j"
SUBJECT: September 1990 Monthly Report
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY
In August, 20 building permits were issued for a total valuation
of $293,044. This valuation is down 42% from the Month of Sep-
tember 1989. Year -to -date valuation is 11% down at this point
compared to last year at this date.
I have again included some statistics provided to us from the
Dodge Housing Activity Update, note the Minneapolis /St. Paul area
is down 10% from last year for one and two family dwellings.
There were 18 plumbing, mechanical and miscellaneous permits
issued, for a total of 38 permits issued in the month of Septem-
ber. A complete breakdown is attached. This resulted in ap-
proximately 70 related inspections by this department, and ap-
proximately 18 inspections by Metro West Inspection Services.
(not including inspection by Plumbing Inspector, John Breitner).
PLANNING /ZONING
The Planning Commission, and City Council reviewed and acted on
several staff recommendations that were prepared by this Depart-
ment.
The hazardous building at 2142 Belmont Lane is now boarded up and
secured. The hazardous building at 4748 Hampton Rr.I has been
removed, work will continue on other hazardous /dilapiria build-
ings within the City.
TRAININ GZMEETINGS
I represented the City of Mound at the International Conference
of Building Officials Annual business meeting September 10th -
14th in Denver, Colorado. This is the annual code change meeting
in which designated representatives from municipalities may vote
on proposed code changes. Anyone can propose a code change, but
only a designated member /building official may vote.
303
Planning & Inspections
jeptember 1990 Monthly Report
Page 2
A highlight of the new code charges is one that will require a
smoke detector within each sleeping room, in addition to one
centrally located in the corridor or area giving access to each
separate sleeping area as the present code requires. The reason
for this code change is to provide additional protection for
building occupants, particularly children and the elderly.
There was one proponent who quoted Sir Winston Churchill who once
stated, "Never have so few acted in the benefit of so many
(children, elderly, and smoke detector manufacturers)." Note:
approved code charge-- will be in effect in the 1991 Uniform
Building Code.
•
•
3o 39
•
E
CITY Of MOUND
5341 Maywood Reed
Mound, MN 55364
BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT
r+alllta SEPTEMBER , IM
N RElIOENTIµ NW.w
U31
T oo %a
STRyCTION Ix•InP,I
x...+n
�,...
�"~"
t" y.w
01119
V&%~
1 ONy.I.M,
L3
1.244
A. w.lwr.w � Z.
1 e.•,w
♦ Tlrw \ 1.1.��
Awlttr. ~
TOW x•rne,. U,w
13
1, 244 .085
NEW Rtl10ENTIAL
IO,ot • { T,•n
1. "am
L Y,"II
6" OWW"
TOW NOR /Onte1
r
N[W NON•Rtl10CNTIAL�
i..'"�"
fCentln•rcNViltlll
wow
w x..w
w...,
• A.r....
a
� Itl•,P.y ewq.
a .I.
• aw M.+a
P,•.r
• N.,,..N W
u.utww,l
r
WW
•'3
Pt.l.
TOW NO&NOW001W
ADOITIONII
A11, O AITERATONS
, VfDENTIAL
P euwluw
w ►.I.tl ,
wt.r.
2
27.000
25
43Y'509
' '•"'"" "' °•'•�••
3 •
29.984
23
86
a te ~ •
1
5,000
J7,400
5
314,275
TT Mwa•mW
18
70,544
179
990,792
°►
" w.�M:
TIONS{ A ERAT IO
wItIM.,
w ►..r.
ON E
wow
1 MMtInM e01.
t
1 e•..,....1 OIII•,
10
l
' " ~M � / """
1
190,000
1
190,000
ch
19,000
5
70
T QQ p ' I N ° " p R •'b•n " •1
2
209,000
16
1,016,199
AND
T( TD
V-01 '"'"'
DST:
13
20 293,044 x..,, 3,264,576
CONVERSION!
" Aw .l••� ,,, yy rw T• 0.4
1 M. M C...•..rw.,
ww1.M
..N+Iri
1 I �
T0I.1 Conr•,•yn•
OEMOIRIpN!
.,
Tw t.p.t.
ww A....rM
2
T otal D•�.ON1Nin1
4
4
PERMITS. INSPECTIONS w•,,,.
s
N .
"
► E
Ti0N3 n..,
urll.
n✓ la 0."
VIVO
rV-0.0 D ole
W 1.
1•r Ia.Ma
r.r " 0,"
O """
20
209
fences /wall!
1
38
IN-"
1
63
la.pt..w
8
41
e•"
0
27
YY w....,.
31
sir'
M la'" 0.•K.I.n
TOTAL
38
411
U31
DODGE HOUSING REPORT
2nd Ouarter 1990 DWELLING UNITS CHANGI
RANK: O NE AND TWO FAMILY HOUSING AREAS 1990 1989
1 Riverside -San Bernardino
2 Atlanta
3 Washington, D.C.
4 Sacramento
5 Minneapolis -St. Paul
6 Chicago
7 Orlando
8 Detroit
9 Philadelphia
10 Los Angeles -Long Beach
11 Phoenix
12 Seattle
13 Las Vegas
14 Baltimore
15 Dallas
16 Houston
17 Mi .+mi -Ili al eah
19 San Diego
19 Ch rlotte- Gastonia -Rock Hill
�0 Tampa•- St.Petersburg- Clearwater
21 St. Louis
22 Indianapolis
23 Columbus
24 Kansas City
2S Richmond - Petersburg
26 Portland, OR
27 Norfolk -Va. Beach- Newport News
28 W. Palm Bch -Poca Rtn- Delray Bch
29 Anaheim Ana
:;0 Oakland
TOTAL
7,144
12,118
-41
5,703
6
- 5
5,608
7
-24
5,114
5,307
- 4
3,5JB
3,923
-10
3,324
3,702
-10
3,293
3,938
-16
3,289
3,724
-12
3,270
4,364
-25
3,268
5,829
-44
3,195
3,321
- 4
3,158
3,076
+ 3
3,081
2,BO7
+10
3,042
3,412
-11
3,019
2,58.;
+17
2,808
2,464
+14
2,435
1,663
+46
2, --89
3,572
-JJ
2,323
2 , 139
+ 9
2,318
2,866
-19
2,298
2,887
-20
2,072
1,876
+10
2,053
2,008
+ 2
2,001
2,051
- 2
1,901
1,928
- 1
1,862
1,4 -6
+28
1,823
2,451
-26
1,818
2,924
-38
1,818
2,2
-18
1,794
2 , 756
-3 5
90,759
106,770
-15
Tne regional distribution of the 30 areas is depicted as follows:
Structure Type _ Northeast Midwest ` South We
One and Two 'ly 1 7 12 10
DvielIing Lu , ; L�nr_,truction in the 30 arras as compared to the
same period of IYU9 is categuri zed beluw:
Slriictur TY he _ Increased _Same Decr eased
r]
0
•
Gne and Tenn Family 9 0 21
3o910
CITY (AN R)( "NI)
SEPTEMBER 1990 MONTHLY REPORT
PARK DEPARTMENT
•
•
Parks
Currently we have finished the Mound entrance sign on County Road
15, did the rough grading for the play structure and Chester, and
did the improvements to Centerview Beach that consisted of moving
the parking area back to create a grass area next to the beach,
installed vehicle barriers and placed 150 ton of sand on the
beach.
The mowing of parks has continued and w i 1 1 soon be over as the
fall weather sets in. At that time, we will winterize all of our
equipment and store it until next spring. All the picnic tables
and garbage cans within the parks have been removed except for
Mound Bay Park. We have re- seeded grass areas that have been
disturbed during the last few months so that it will germinate
prior to the first freeze. The three softball infields at Swen-
son, Philbrook and Three Points have each had 50 ton of aggrelime
added to them.
Commons
As you are aware, Dell Rudolph has resigned as the Dock Inspector
effective October 15, 1990. Dell has been responsible for taking
a dock system that was a bit unorgan i zed and putting together a
system that works very effectively and fair to all participants.
This job that he has held for seven years has been one that
required the ability to work with the citizens of Mound to
resolve questions and problems as the arise. In doing so, he has
handled many varied circumstances that have satisfied the parties
involved without taking up time of other staff or elected offi-
cials.
Tree Removal /Weed Notices
Three trees were removed from City property, two trees notices
were sent for hazardous conditions on private property.
Five weed notices were sent to private property owners and three
areas were mowed under forced removal conditions.
Cemetery
With weather cooling, the maintenance at the cemetery has slowed.
When the leaves finally fall, we will do a clean -up of the area
and the street crew will mark the area for winter burials.
3041
•
CITY of ♦ `IOU , D MO N MINNESOTA ROAD
55364
(612) 472 -1155
October 2, 1990
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER
JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR '
SEPTEMBER FINANCIAL REPORT
SEPTEMBER
INVESTMENTS
Balance
9 -1 -90
$8,057,694
Bought:
Farm Cr.
8.10 Marquette Due
9 -3 -91
400,000
CP
7.91 Dain Bosworth Due
1 -31 -91
269,186
CP
7.94 Marquette Due
12 -31 -90
180,148
Matured:
CD
8.05 4h Fund
(100,000)
Farm Cr
8.22 Marquette
(350,000)
FNMA
8.42 Dain Bosworth
(225,000)
BA
8.10 American
( 97,391)
CP
8.27 Shearson
(235,086)
CP
8.63 Shearson
(199.4
Balance
9 -30 -90
$7,700,109
•: •V
The Minnesota Government Finance Officers (GFOA) had their annual
conference this month at Arrowwood in Alexandria. I attended
sessions on legislative update, recycling trends, investment
stratgies for cities and other sessions inclulding non - technical
sessions on human relations. The conference is also a great
opportunity to talk with your peers in a relaxed setting.
It was announcea at the conference that I was elected Treasurer
of the state GFOA board for 1991. I will now be on track to
become president of GFOA in 1994. I look forward to a
challenging ar.d j•.-wa,•ding involvement with GFOA over the next few
years.
JN:ls ,
LJ
naj.or.3' j 4 ,, hand!apped status
a[tivau5
•
•
October 1, 1990
CiITY of MOUND ,D MO ND MINNE 5364
(612) 472 -1155
TO: MAYOR, CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL
FROM: JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER
RE: SEPTEMBER MONTHLY REPORT
The summer has ended and autumn is upon us, which means that we
immediately have to reverse gears at the liquor store. The
consumers' buying habits changes drastically after Labor Day.
The emphasis switches from volume purchases of beers and wine
coolers towards a more upscale interest in California and
imported premium wines and also cordials and liqueurs.
The first task performed ia September is to restructure our
chilled wine selection. We decrease the amount of space taken by
wine coolers and put in their place other items such ae German
wines, (for Octoberfest) and a larger selection of chardcnnays,
white zinfandels and peemium table wir.• When spring returns
next year we will change it back again:
I have decided this fall to upgrade our boutique wine selection.
We are already strong in the area of the "Fighting Varietals ".
"Fighting Varietals' is a category of California wines (750 mis.)
that retail between $4.99 and $5.99. Sutter Home, Glen Ellen and
M.G. Vallejo are ,just s ,me of the vineyards vying for this market
share. ghat we are lacking in (I should rephrase t,' -, it, and say
there has been very little demand until now) are those cabernets,
pinot noirs, zinfandels and chardonnays that retail from $8 to
$12. To fit this niche, I have brought in on an experimental
basis, three exceptional vineyards; Charles Krug, Buena Vista and
Mirassou. If these perform up to my expectations, I will
introduce several more as the holidays approach.
r.- „ r ; loped sra!,is 3 013
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
September 24, 1990
Those present were: Cnair Bill Meyer, Vice Chair Geoff Michael,
Commissioners Ken Smith, Jerry Clarsaddle, Bill Thal, Bill Voss,
and Michael Mueller, Council Representative Liz Jensen, City
Planner Mark Koegler, Building Official Jon Sutherland, and
Secretary Peggy James. Frank Weila:)d was absent.
The follow'ng citizens were also present: Doug Farmer, and David
& Linda Jagerson.
The meeting was called to order at 7:34 p.m.
Minutes
MOTION made by Clapsaddle, seconded by Voss to approve
the Planning Commission Minutes of September 10, 1990 as
written. Motion carried unanimously.
Case No. 40 -935: Douglas 9 Carol Farmer, 3020 Highland Blvd.,
L ot 7__ Block 2, Highl PID #23- 117 -24 -41 0013. CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT FOR AN OVERSIZED ACCESSORY BUILDING. (PUBLIC HEARING ).
Building Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicant's
request to build a 16' x 24' addition onto an existing 24' x 24'
detached accessory bu.lding. The sc;uare footage of the finished
accessory building would total 960 square feet which exceeds the
840 square foot minimum without a conditional use permit. The
proposed addition and the existing garage conforms to all
required setbacks. The applicant's request appears to meet the
criteria for granting a conditional use permit.
Staff recommended approval of the conditional use permit as
requested.
The applicant, Doug Farmer, spoke on his behalf and explained the
reason for the garage expansion is to store two 1939 antique
cars, which is his hobby.
Chair Meyer opened t`:: public hearing.
David 8 Linda Jagerson, abutting neighbors to the subject
property, spoke in opposition of the proposed garage expansion.
They noted the following rep -ons:
1. The use is nonconforming to the residential nature of the
neighborhood.
2. The lots in the area are too narrow.
3. The increase in hard cover.
4. They plan to construct a foyer addition in the near future,
and their view from it would be obstructed by the garage. 0
UyN
Planning Commission Minutes
Septemoer 24, 1990
f age Z
Mueller nuted that, including both the garage and the hcise, only
IS% of the lot will be co-ered.
Chair Meyer closed the public hearing.
The Commission expressed concern regarding the use uF the garage,
and how they can prevent a . i a l use to appear In the fu-
ture. After further discussion regarding the aesthetics of the
garage, - the following motion was made.
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by CIapsaddIe to recom-
mend approva 1 of the cord i t i ona 1 use perm i t to a I 1 ow a
960 square foot garage as proposed, with the following
stipulations: 1) the garage space is to be used by the
occupant only, and 2) the applicant is to submit a
landscaping plan for approval by the City Planner to
determine that adequate foundation screening is provided
(especially to the east side of the structure). Motion
carried 7 to I (those in favor were: Clapsaddle, Muel-
ler, Thal, Meyer, Jensen, Smith and Michael; Voss was
opposed).
Voss stated his reason for opposing is that he sees potential for
future abuse of the use.
This case will be hearo by the City Council at a public hearing
schedided October 23, 1990.
Case No. 90 -937: Roland R. Gavin, 5000 Enchanted Road, Lot 1,
Block 21, Shadywood Point, P(D #13- 117 -24 -11 0069. VARIANCE:
FRONT 3 FIDE YARD SETBACK
The Commission recognized that the applicant, Mr. Gavin, was not
present. Commissioner Smith informed the Commission that he
talked to the applicant's wife, and she stated Mr. Gavin was out
of town and may not return in -time for the meeting. She opted to
table the request.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Ciapsaddla to table
the request until the Planning Commission Meeting of Oc-
tober 8, 1990, and have the City Council hear the
request on October 9, 1990. Motion carried unanimously.
Comme Building Materials / Site Plan Approval
T;)e City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed his memorandum dated"
September 20, 1990 with the Commission. The reason for im-
plementing P site plan approval provision is to give the city an
added tool to maintain a minimum level of acceptable community
aesthetics. Koegler suggested that a site plan review ordinance
that contains architectural standards be prepared. He referred
soyS
Planning Commission Minutes
September 24, 1990
Page 3
to a copy of the City of Chanhassen's site plan review provisions
as an example. :he minimal acceptable standards should be deter-
mined.
Koegler commented that a negative aspect of adopting a site plan
review is that it adds another step to getting the project ap-
proved which can sometimes be a deterrent to the developer.
Koegler confirmed that the Chanhassen ordinance, as written, does
not exclude wood as an acceptable material. Some of the Commis-
sioners commented that they we -e in favor of a site plan review.
It was determined that staff ould draft an ordinance modifica-
tion for their review.
ONR Dredge Application R91 -6051 at Halstead's Bay; Bayridoe Road
9 Westedg Blvd.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Mueller, the Planning
Commission does not see any problems with ONR Dredge Ap-
plication #91 -6C51. Motion carried unanimously.
Meeting Date: November 12, 1990
Monday, November 12, 1990 is Veteran's Day, City Offices are
closed. The Secretary explained that when the calendar was
reviewed at the beginning of the year, rescheduling or canceling
this meeting should be discussed at a later date.
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Voss to cancel the
November 12, 1990 Planning Commission Meeting. Motion
carried unanimously.
it was noted that if the need arises to hold a meeting, Chair
Meyer has the authority to call a meeting at any time. A sug-
gested date for such meeting is November 5.
City Council Representative's Report.
Liz Jensen reviewed the City Council meeting of September 12th.
She enlightened the Commission on actions made on zoning cases
and discussion about the central business district parking and
the LMCD Shoreland Management Plan.
Planning Commiss Recognition Dinner
C7
•
It was determined that the Recognition Dinner would be held on
Friday, November 2, 1990 at the Lafayette Club, and the City
Council will not be invited since this is a special event for the
Planning Commission Members. Staff who works with the Planning
Commission will be invited.
3644
Planning Commission Minutes
September 24, 1990
Page 4
MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Voss to adjourn the
Planning Commission Meeting at 9:31 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
Chair, Bill Meyer
Attest:
�J
•
3047
REC'� SEP 2 8 1990
„f
�C
• I . y
L
/ 1pa
•
I?2G- I12
67 /cq ��t 6- "�L
le-. Z�ec-�,
07'
r
"i
i
�f
i�
i
li
ii
I I
3o�:g
1
•
To 1'e pr• !SentPd tr thf ^M:mhers ^` the Motif+ "i ty Courlcil at the
• m, - etinC Of %IIC rst 28, on
We thn andersienr-i nprer wit' , the uiiani^nus decision of the Planning
o
Cm nn AuCust 13, 19 ()0, to recommend the denial of the minor
subdivision and variance at 5013 Tumedo. The deteriorating condition
of this property i s a co-istant elesor a and i s lowering the value
of our property. We want the property cleaned up and the R -1 single
family zoning status enforced.
Name
Address
Da t e
• � J
•
g -�
Sb
30 `l9
s
� �
Da t e
• � J
•
g -�
Sb
30 `l9
To I.e p. sente(I to tlt1- moinhot s M0111111 City COM,ci 1 It the
Mee tint on 1ul;-ist ,N, 19 •
We the undersiCnnll at�rce with the unanimous decision of the I" anninj;
Commission on August 13, 1900. to recommend '.he denial of the minor
subdivision and variance at 5012 Tuze;lo. The deteriorating condition
of this property is a constant eyesore and is lowering the value
of our property. We want the property cleaned up and the R -1 single
family zoning status enforced.
Name Address Date
r�
Otoso
0 MARK SALITERMAN C.P.A.
DIAMOND HILL CENTER
4301 HIGHWAY 7
SUITE 100
ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55343
Mr. id Shukle
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ed,
September 27, 1990
TELEPHONE (612)
920 -e292
Thank you for finally resolving the issue of the fence
between Hardee's and my Shopping Center. I think it is important
to at least summarize my point of view, in case some comment is
made in the future.
I applied for a permit to put up the fence in accordance
with the ordinances and was granted such permit. We began to
construct the fence, and after a fair amount of work was done we
were issued a stop work order, and more than that we were told
that we had to rip out the fence we had installed. I have just
been billed by the fencing company approximately $1,000.00 for
the additional work performed. As I am sure you are all aware,
the fence finally did go up and you granted the permit, or
removed the stop work order. I value my relationship with the
City in high regard, and without your cooperation throughout the
last ten years, I couldn't have taken that yellow and black ugly
building that was 80% vacant to its present condition, which in
my opinion is quite a step up. You have always treated me fairly
and I tope that the discussions, arguments and even my hot temper
will not affect this relationship in the ft.ture. I have no
intention of pursuing the additional cos:: which I incurred, due
to, in my opinion, a breakdown in procedures, but felt that it
should be noted.
Just to update you, I have met with the owner of the land
once, over a week ago and I have not heard from him since. It
surprises me that I didn't received a follow up from Mr. Nelson
if it was important to him. Thanks again for all your help.
Sincerely,
Mark A. Saliterman
cc: Mr. Stephen Smith - Mayor
, SOS/ MEMBER OF AMEHICAPJ IN5TIiU1F OF CE=RTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
LAKE MINN ETON KACONSERVATION DISTRICT
473 -7033
L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE
October 1990
ECE OCT 21990
Monday
8
Columbus
Day Holiday, LMCD office closed
Saturday
13
Water Structures & Environment Committee
7:30 a.m.
Shorewood
City Hall
Monday
15
Lake Use
Committee
4:30 p.m.
Shorewood
Citv Hall
Friday
19
Eurasian
Water Milfoil
Task Force
8:30 a.m.
Freshwater
Foundation
Wednesday 24 LMCD Board o: Directors' Regular Meeting
7:30 p.m. Tonka Bay City Hall
9 -28 -90
•
•
3oS#%
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
•
473 -7033
E V E N T S S C H E D U L E
October 1990
REC'U OCT 21990
Race schedule, Wayzata Yacht Club, Lower Lake only:
Oct 6 Saturday 10:00 a.m. 2nd Commodore Cup
Oct 13 Saturday 10:00 a.m. 3-d Commodore Cup
Oct 20 Saturday 10:00 a.m. 4th Commodore Cup
Oct 27 Saturday 10:00 a.m. Main Lake (Frostbite)
•
Viking Bassm,isters of Minnesota tournament
Oct 14 Sunday
9 -28 -90
7:00 a.m. North Shore Drive Marina
3453
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
10/3/90
aIru OCT a 1990 0
TO: LMCD Cities Participating in Shoreland Rules Review of 9/20
FROM: Chair Dave Cochran, Advisory (nmmittee Chair Bob Rascop
SUBJECT: Shoreland Protection Study As Tabled by LMCD Board 9/26/10
You will find the 9/26 Board minutes enclosed in ad of their normal
distribution to report on the proceedings and action taken on the Management
Plan.
The tabling action for 30 days is intended to allow cities to individually
e• 3s a group bring their specific recommendations together. In so doing
with advice to LMCD by Wednesday, October 17, it is anticipated a resolution
to differences in the Shoreland Protection plan section, and Appendix C, can
be reached. The recommendations received by 10/17 will be forwarded to the
LMCD Board for reconsideration and incorporation into the Shoreland Protection
chapter.
The Introduction, Appendices and Implementation sections iI, VII and VIII
were similarly tabled for 70 days as those portions of the plan relate to
the Shoreland Protectior . .er.
It is apparent that the City of Wayzata and Spring Park are initiating
their proposals to address differences with the Shoreland Protection-
Perhaps others are as well. We encourage your collaborative effort as may
be appropriate.
John Stine, MN DNR Regional Hydrologist, 772 -7910, suggested to our office
that he ould be available to discuss Shoreland Protection and the new rules.
He tentdLively set aside some time for 1:00 pm, Wednesday, October 10•
ANY CITY SO INTERESTED IN MEETING WITH STINE SHOULD MAKE THEIR ARRANGEMENTS
DIRECTLY WITH STINE HE LIKELY WOULD MEET AT AN AREA NEAR THE LAKE- PERHAPS
AT THE WAYZATA COUNCIL CHAMBERS SIMILAR TO THE 9.20 MEETING•
In any case, LMCD looks forward to receiving your further advice for making
appropriate adjustments to the Shoreland Protection, and for that matter
other points of concern you still wish to convey.
•
30 5'y
RKC'U OCT 4 1y9U
LAKE: MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Board of Directors
Regular Meeting, 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, September 26, 1990
Tonka Bay City hall
1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair
Cochran at 7:30 p.m.
2. Roll Call
Members Pi-sent: Douglas Babcock, Spring Parl Marvin
Biorlin, Tonka Bay; Jan Boswinkel, Secretary, Minnetonka Beach;
David Cochran, Chair, Greenwood; Bert Foster, Vice Chair,
Deephaven; James Grathwol. Excelsior; JoEllen Hurr, Orono; John
I,ewman, 'Treasurer, Minne: Thomas Martinson, Wayzata (as
noted); Robert Pillsbury, Minnetonka; Robert Rascop, Shorewood;
II'homas Reese, Mound; Robert Slocum, Woodland. Also present:
Charles LeFevere, Counsel; Rachel Thibault, Administrative
Technician; David Arndorfer, Consultant; Eugene Strommen,
Executive Director.
Member Absent: John Malinka, Victoria.
3. Reading of Minutes: Boswinkel moved, Foster seconded, to
approve the minutes of the August 22, 1990 meeting as submitted.
Motion carried unanimously.
4. Public Comments: Gabriel Jabbour, Orono, asked that the
Board not be hasty in adopting the Management Plan because future
ecological. problems have not been identified. He urges more of
thq cities to become active participants in the Plan development.
Al Klingelhutz, Carver County, deferred his comments for the
arrival of the Carver County planner.
Agenda Amendment Grathwol moved, Bosw.ink«,1. 5- ,Pcond(- to
amend the agenda order to consider item 5.A.4.a) at this time.
Motion carried Unanimously.
5.A.4. ADVISORY COMMITTEE, Chair Rascop
a) Lona 'Perm Manap_ernent Program for 1,ak MinnF-, t()nka,
consideration of final draft, August 1990, 11, submitted or
amended.
Rascop stated this meeting is intended for adoption of the
Long Term Management Program. He called upon the public present
for cornnlent .
Liz Jensen, 1.ound City Councilmember, sr .)n her , _'r•lu
behalf , shared views expressed by the Mound Ci Shy
expre,sF!d thank, to Tom ReesF! and the Board fr,r th-i r w
►f- !nnr?rl states th , - � City of Mound supports moviwl,' rih --.id with t11-
Man.agem -rlt. Flan although they are not in total with the
flan. 'They hav;� concern about when
thel r C ty of 1),000 has the 5' - Irne vote, FIr3 , "1 r,' I ty f
600. :ihe n. t11": fpl_rrt<;F -'n co min iiri i t1C,'r; mU:_-t, W _ 11C t.U(.1F'tI I t.r'
avoid some-. other clgt,r'� - :y tFakln(r over the L %j rn -1T1 lE', _'I,I�'rlt.
3osS
1
LMCD Board of Directors September 26, 1990
Virginia Harris, Planner, spoke on behalf of Carver County.
She
expressed the surprise of the Carver County Board when they
received a copy
of the Plan which indicated all of Carver County
would be subJect to
a tax for support of the Lake Management
program. She noted there
was no provision for Garver County
representation on the LMCD Board. Harris mentioned the funding
of regional parks by Carver County, parks which serve the entire
'rhe
area. Carver County Board requests the portion referring to
taxing their
cou�ity be removed from the plan.
Rascop apologized repeatedly to Carver Cok:-►ty for the late
notice its
of inclusion in the Plan, particularly without being
involved i, the discussions leading
up to it.
Arr,d%-.fer said there is a charge in wording which leaves in
the
statement that it would be equitable for Carver County to pay
its fait- share. The
purpose is to acknowledge the future growth
of Carver County's use of Lake Minnetonka.
Al Klingelhutz, Carver County Commissioner, asked that
reference
to Carver County be eliminated in its entirety.
Cochran
responded the concept is that the people using the Lake
should for its
pay management. It is planned that some funding
will come from user fees.
The Carver County representatives were assured they will be
notified
of meetings in the future.
e5�M&.. n, Mound, objected to Jensen's comments. He feels
there has been
very little detail available to the public. He
objects to what he identifies
as taxation without representation.
He also thinks the shoreland controls will prohibit
some
communities from controlling their zoning. Rascop responded that
the shoreland
ordinance places the controls in the hands of the
communities. It also would protect against implementation of a
state -wide shoreland management rule which would nut, meet Lhe,
needs of Lake Minnetonka
municipalities.
Thomas Martinson arrived.
Robert caisvold, Mayor, City of Wayzata, silbmitted a letter•
from the City indicating their concerns about the Shoreland
Management Plan, expansion of LMGD membership and staff, and
increases in costs to implement the Plan. GisvoId requested
tabling of the plan until the cities can get together.
Addressing the Shoreland Management Plan he said it would create
an additional delay for zoning applicants to go through LM(A) for
approval. The City would welcome input from the District at any
time arid he beli -ves LMUD car, now cio this.
Dori Germanson, Tonka Day, representing the Lake Minnetonka
Lakeshore Owners Association (LMLOA), stated the group backs the
plan. He expressed the LMLOA concerns about the reference to
"heachinp" and finds a clarification is ri.-eded. UJIMA i5
concerned about the wording regarding boat access. lt, questions
the usable water acreage in view of the loss of additional usable
area to Eurasian water milfoil. Germanson sugFestod communicating
with the Lake rleneva, Wisconsin, authoritiF�s on their maliaf�ement
controls.
3 osi
LMCD Board of Directors Septe• r ':E, 199U
Arndorfer responded that he welet—med the comment on the usable
acreage. An attempt has been made to get the DiI and
Metropolitan Council to adjust the density figures for public
access of one boat per ten acres. 'Those a fl, es, -ies F, r. t, t.hr-
standards and have independent authority to do so. Rascop rioted
the 700 car /trailer parking spaces for public access is a
compromise from the original amount, which is half of what could
be 1,400 car /trailer parking spaces based oil one boat per ten
acres.
Jerry Rockvam, Mayor, Spring Park, stated their
representative has been instructed to vote no on the HP
asked for delay in action, noting Spring Park is a n1 conforrnin€
communi *v in many aspects of the shore rules proposed.
Arndorfer responded there is a time frame established for
shoreland rules adoption. This is a section which could be open
to amendment in the future. Rar;cop noted tht} LMCU enabl irrF=
legislation already gives the District authority over storm water
run -off from hard - cover. Storm water run -off is an environmental
concern.
Jan Boswinkel, Minnetonka Beach, presented his City's
statement approving the plan. The statement recognises the need
for a plan. It details the thoughts of the City Council �n
arriving at the decision along with suggestions for
implementation. The statement was made a part of the files.
0 ACTIONS:
Hurr moved, Bjorlin seconded, to table the plan for six
months because there will be local elections this fall which
could result in a change in municipal leadership and because t
will give the Board time to work out some of the concorns
expressed. Hurr_ and Bjorl_in voter] aye. Martinson abn�taiII I.
There were ten nay votes. The moti(:n failed.
Grathwol moved, Foster seconded, to consider tllr' Lor1fy Term
ManaFe►nf,rrt Program draft of August, 199U, as _�mr.nc:lr!d in Sr ,tiC
in an effort. to find out if there are certain portion; of th
draft that the Board supports. Motion carried, Hurr and
Babcock voting! nay.
Gratl)wol moved, Foster seconded to apprnvF; ;;e ti ( )n I I ,
lZec_reation Management, Section III , User Experiencei:;:4t is fa •ti0n,
�nrl Section V, Envi roninentaI Pr(-) test. ion. Motion ( :,err it 1, Harr r
voting !ray.
LeVPvere co1lnse.led the Board in i•eSpr;n -;Ft try (il "atllNvl
request regarding the action being prot.')sed tit -_At, tII 1;oard rIt
this time is approving the Plan, car t�r of thy: Flan, in thr!
ss nse that a committee report ic; b approv,'rl. 'I I1v: tr!,t (If
the Plan is bring approved, but, tllr, ,�pprove•d text t'(.)rt iorl: arf�
not being; formally adopted as the H m at?ernr_�nt Plan it, this t,im
Formal adr)t of the Plan will tatr.r ;wt.i f
adoption.
3057
LN.CD Board of Directors
Grathwol moved, Reese
IV, Shoreland Protection.
Cochran moved, Pillsbury
approval of Section IV for 30
Reese, Hurr and Bjorlin voting
September 26, 1990
seconded, approval of Section
seconded, to table the motion for
days. Mc, -ion carried, Grathwol,
nay.
Grathwol moved, Fo-ter seconded, approval of Section V1,
Management Structure.
Al Klingelhutz, Carver County, asked that the reference to
Carver County be removed from the draft. Grathwol accepted
Foster's amendment to the motion to change the reference to
Carver County to read "every county ".
Motion carried as amended, Pillsbury, Reese, Hurr, N Orlin
and Martinson voting nay.
Grathwol moved, Rascop seconded, to G�)prove Se--- t.ions 1,
Introduction, Section VIII, Appendices and Section V11,
Implementation, of the draft.
Martinson moved, P4.11sbury seconded, to table approval of
Sections I, VIII and VII for 30 days. Motion carried, Grathwol,
Lewman, Reese, Hurr and Bjorlin voting nay.
The deadline for comments on the sections not approved was
set for the third Wednesday in October, the 17th.
Hurr was excused. •
5. Reports
A. Standing Committees
1) WATER STRUCTURFkS, Babcock for Chair Grathwol
a) Boswinkel moved, Pillsbury seconded, to .approve the
minutes of 9-8 -90 as submitted, correcting the typographical
error in sentence 5 of paragraph 4 under Lake Virginia Control
Structure to show the OHWL as 929.8'. Motion carried
unanimously.
b) Lake Virginia Control Structure. Babcock moved,
Pillsbury seconded, to recommend responding to the MN L)14R request
for comments on the application of the 1,ake Virginia Homeowners
Association by recommending restoration of an appropriate weir as
determined by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to establish
the ordinary high water (929.8') level, and then study the matter
to come to a long term solution. Motion carried unaninuA1.91y.
c) Amenity Study. Babcock moved, kascop seconded,
approval of the Water Structures Commi`.tee recommendation for
approval of the proposed code amendment, as amend D -irinP the
riiscussion the question was raised as to whether the amenities
.,pplied to grandfathered licenses or only to new additions to a
current license. There was a diversity of opinion on this point.
Foster moved, 4artinson seconded, to table the am-nity stu
bark to the Water Structi.irr� Committee. Motion carried.
30S t
4
LMCD Board of Directors September 26, 1990
is d) North Shore Drive Marina :Stipulation Amendrrlerit.
Babco k moved, Boswinkel seconded, to remove the requirement for
fencing the east dock at the North Shore Drive Marina,
substituting signs to be posted along the dock length restricting
the east dock to short term loading and unloading of handicapped
persons. Motion carried unanimously.
e) City of Deephaven Fae Refund.
Foster seconded. approv of a $3,27(i refund
Deephaveri due to overpayment as a result of
slips and therefore fee obligations,in its new
include the new dock license, fees for the eight
Motion carried unanimously.
Babcock moved,
to the City of
tide reduction of
dock license, to
a3dit.ional slips.
2; LAKE USE COMMITTEE, Chair Pillsbury
a) Pillsbury moved, Foster seconded, approval of the
minutes of the meeting of 9 -17 -90 as submitted. Motion carried
unanimously.
b) Amendment to Code re Observer Rule Code 3.10, Subd.
1 Pillsbury moved, !roster secoi:�!d, approval of an amendment
to Co& 3.10, Subd. 1, providing for exceptions to the observer
rule while towing persons in the water. Foster, Pillsbury,
Reese, Babcock, Martinson and Slocum voted aye. Grathwol,
Cochran, Boswinkel, Lewman, Rascop and B,jorlin voted nay. The
motion failed on 3 6 - 6 vote.
c) Resolutior, 62, Resolution Setting Fees_ Pillsbury
moved, Foster seconded, to approve an amendment to Resolution 62,
changing the latr fee requirement for open water fishing contests
to 90 days; removal of the $25 administrative fee for deicing
rron- renewals, Code now to allow new deicing licenses; and change,
the Charter license fee from $5U t $100 arid renewal deadline to
March 1 from May 1. Motion carried unanimously.
d) Buoy Removal for Watercraft Moorings. Pillsbury moved,
B;)orlin seconded, to instruct staff to prepare all amendment to
Code 2. 12, Subd 7, requiring buoy removal by December 15 or as
ice /weather conditions permit.
During the discussion questions arose regarding; wording in
the exi. - meting Code relative to getting written approval from the
r i f f to leave a buoy in beyond that date. It, was also
suggested that wording about submerging the buoy in lieu of
i ,moval be included.
Grathwol moved, Rascop seconded, to table the Code amendment
back to they C;onimi ttee. Motion carried urrarrirn,:,usly.
e) Deposit Refunds Pillsbury moved, Babcock seconded,
to apprr-ve deposit refunds to MN /WI Pro -Arn ltass '1'(: rits,
`x/27, 7; 28 acid 1`). and and to Wedne =,lay 1`1iriht Bass
Tuiirnarr. 6/13 t,lrr_ 81''�'190 a, all permit corlditine` were
met. Mot.i carriF•d �_rnar,im�?I_rsly.
1') llennepi n County /[,MCI) Joint, and Coo perati v
Agreement.. The Board received an updated draf t of t o opr.r=rtinF-r
ar reemt .-n t, 1)F- t,wo , rl ilcnnF- pJ n U(. Inty and the 1,11( '1) for law
enf <_ <Slnent. SCrvices (I'll Lake MiririctOnka. The draf t bloc ?2- F-)ror'ates
$059
LMCD Board of Directors September 26, 1990
the changes rec(jmmen6ed by the Lake Use Committee and a
subsequent additional minor change in wording suggested by the
Sheriff.
Biorlin moved, Rascop seconded, approval of the Hennepin
County/ LMCD Joint and Cooperative Agreement and authorized its
signing and forwarding for completion by Hennepin County. Motion
carried unanimously.
LeFevere noted there will be some changes in ._tatutory
citations in the Agreement because. of legislation pass(,d since
the original agree,:.ent was enacted In 1978.
g) Water Patrol Report Pillsbury reported from a
written Water Patrol report on property damage accidents and a
personal injury accident. There have been 94 Balls issued on Lake
Minnetonka, 91 by the Sheriff, 2 by the DNR and 1 by the City of
Orono. Over all 100 BWIs have been issued in Hennepin County.
Sgt. Chandler was absent due to priority duty assignment.
3) ENVIRONMENT, hair Reese
a) 1990 Operating Report Reese presented the 1 990
Eurasian Water Milfoil weed harvest program report in draft i -rm.
A substitu:a Page 2 was presented at the meeting to complete
blanks left in the draft at the time of mailing. Reese said the
1991 program will be prepared for early consideration.
Information from the Corps of Engineers is that the Corps'
funding priorities are (11 navigational use; (2) water for
consumption (reservoirs); and (3) recreational. Letters
supporting LMCD's position have been sent to the Corps' Chief by
Governor Perpich, Congressman Stangeland and Senator Bos--hwiti.
Reese reported the Fresh Water Foundation has conducted a
study finding that there a.e 192,000 acres of water in the state
lakes subject to milfoil infestation. The cost to treat suct, a
state -wide infestation could cost $40 million to control.
Milfoil has been found in Bush Lake and Lake Sarah. The chemical
treatment at Lake Independence in late summer was not effective.
Reese read a quote from Aquatic Plant Management Magazine stating
the breaking of the milfoil stem occurs naturally and spreads
itself without human intervention.
Reese moved, Rascop seconded, approval of the 1990 Eurasian
Water Milfoil Weed Harvesting Program Concluding Report as
amended. Motion carried unanimously.
The Board thanked R--ese for chairing the program. The
Executive Director acknowledged the extensive work of Norm Paurus
and Rob Merila. They were faced with making an exceptional
number of adjustments during the season and were very inventive
in carrying them out.
b) Reese submitted a preliminary financial summary.
It was accepted and ordered filed.
5. B. Treasurer., Lewman
1 ) Lewman presented the statement of cast, 'rransnctioiis
through August 31, 1990. It was accepted and ordered filed.
3o Lb 6
LMCD Board of Directors September '-'H, 1 99U
2) Lewman moved, Boswinkel seconded, approval of the
payment of checks numbered 6404 through 6486 in the total amount
of $77,572.09, copy attached. Motion carried unanimously.
5. C. Executive Director, Strommcn
1) Office Space Stromrnen submitted a recom.nerrdation
to enter into a lease for new office space in the Norwest
Bank,
Wayzata Blvd. at Superior Street, Vayzata. Lewman and
c;
have viewed the space. They are strongly in f�ivor
cif the
expanded facil'ty and rent quoted within LMCD budget. The
lease
agreement is eiig prepared by Norwest Froper
Strommc,i : .id there will not be any separate storage
spy -�e.
It may be neQessary to rent some outside storage space.
Rascop
suggested microfilming old records to save space.
Rascop moved, Bjorlin seconded, approval of a le.-rse
with
Norwest Wayzata Bank meeting the details in th,� l-;x,.�
t, i v
Director's memo dated September 25, 1990. Motion
cnrr.ied
unanimously.
2) The Executive Director reported he wil 1
h,-
Minnesota Lake Man .-gement Conference, October 7 - 9,at, r'rnriun's,
Brainerd. He h -!s been asked to serve as a candid,-3t- fc,r
tlr +�
organizatijn's board.
Rascop moved, Babcock seconded, to authori r-.-
F iir t
Strommen's candidacy for the Board of the Minnes� - eta
Management Federation. Motion carried
L - ik , !
unanimously.
6. Unfinished Business
A. Thibault presF.. the dock license and denr�ity rd�rs
for the City of Deeph i, Minnetonka Boat Works (Uron and the
City of Wayzata.
-,.-id Beth Whittaker. Minne.tonk font. W+,rt::,
(Orono) has point, -d out that 2 b of their Order stir,u1. d roe td
"Licensee shall pro..tc:e a boat for charter purposes for r. r" IF
and individuals omitting the ret r o
underprivileged and handicapped. Strommen corn f i rm
applicant was correct in this regard.
rrathwol moved, Foster seconded, approval of th'. +1 1:
licenses and density orders for the City (_,` L)eephaven, Minn t, nlc+
Boat Works (Orono) and the City of Wayzata,, the Mirnn-t, ink ;r 1'
Works Order to be amended as discussed. Moti c,n c.1. r i "d
unanimously.
7, D. Chair, Cochran
a) Cochran reported the Fresh Water Ft.mrjdl i f. i (,n h.
asked him to sit in with them on fund raisinct dis .+.rr;si rrr, wi III
their Deveropment Committee. He was urged tai do so.
306/
LMCD Board of Directors September 26, 1990
8. New Business is
A. The Executive Director informed the Board he has
appeared with Gen Olson in a photo for campaign literature
showing the milfoil disposal site on her farm. The photo
recognizes her active support to assist Lake Minnetonka's milfoil
problem. Olson is a candidate for State Senator. Rascop
expressed reservations, but recognized her assistance in securing
state support to fund milfoil weed control programs. Rascop
suggested sending letters of appreciation to the people who
cooperated in providing disposal sites.
B. Election of Officers
Slocum moved, Babcock seconded, nominating officers by a
submission of a slate of officers rather than nominating each
office individually. Motion carried unanimously.
Slocum moved, Pillsbury seconded, approval of the following
slate of officers, terms to be effective with installation at the
October Board meeting, LMCD's founding anniversary month:
Chair David Cochran, Greenwood
Vice Chair Bert Foster, Deephaven
Secretary Douglas Babcock, Spring Park
Treasurer Jan Boswinkel, Minnetonka Beach
Rascop moved, Pillsbury seconded, that nominations be
closed. Motion carried unanimously.
Grathwol moved, Rascop seconded, to cast a unanimous ballot
for the nominated slate of officers and to declare them duly
elected. Motion carried unanimously.
Cochran and the new officers expressed their appreciation
for their election.
C. Adjournment Rascop moved, Pillsbury seconded, that the
meeting be adjourned. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting
adjourned at 10:10 p.m.
David Cochran, Chair
Jan Boswinkel, Secretary
•
300
1 "1 E',Lfl.r,7 i.) LI Il11
Board 9/26 by Jan
` Boswinkle on behalf
of Minnetonka Beach Uf C OCT 4 1990
City Council
POSITION OF THE CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF c1llllETOIII A
BEACH P,EGAPDING THE LAI:E MIHNET011FA MANAGEMENT FLAU - 199n
THE CITY OF THE VILI AC-,F OF NINNETOFIf.A EFA('II
PECOGNIZEq mE DE- IRAPII.IT, T( SET UP A h1ANAGEUILNT f LAII ; OF
LAVE MIHNETONI'A AND AFTEP APIAL)7I1`lG THE PLAN FRESEIITLD FOE?
AfFPnVAL TONIGHT WI' HE" TO STATE THE FOLLOWIIIG:
1. THAT THE CIT'I DOES HOT AGREE
IN THIS PLAN AND CONSIDEPIHG THE MIRIAD OF
PFCU I1I7.ING F;'.ISTING FPOBLEMS OVER A BROAD
THAT THE L.M.C.D. WILL SERVE AS THE TARGET
IDEA, MAY FE EXCHANGED. OPINIOMS EXPRESSED
EFFORT; FOP THE FETTEPMENT OF THE LAKE AND
FOPMULATED.
WITH EVEPITHIN(-
DETAIL- AIM
Sf E (' I PUI 11 PU- T
ENTITY' W11LRF
AND ADDITIONAL
THIS FLAU WILL_ BE
THAT BY AFFROVIIIG THE FLAN RATHI:F 1111111 GIVIIIG
IT THE FOPCE OF LAW IT IS TO EE A STATEMENT OF COOfERATIC11.1
WITH ALL THE NUNICIPALITIES AFV!Rlll THE LAKE AMID ME D.N.F.,
HFNNEPIN CnU1IT'1, THE NETRO COUtICIL.. )HE MIMIEHAHA C1
WATFPSIIFD VISTPICT, HEITIIEPIM COUNTY PARK:_' ARID OTHER
INTEPGSTFD ENTI PIES TO LION►' TOWARD KEEPING LAKE PlIfIlIET011K:A A
VIABLE ASSET FOP ALL F'FOFLE.
4. THAT PY AFrr0VAL CAF THIS FLAN 111E CI I1
TO DECI_AFF THAI IT I; 1`101 OUF IDEA TO IMPOSE: 1111 fl-All fill
OTHFF CTTIF" PUT THAT TIIF'i' WHFU AFFPOVIHG fill I I AH ' Il(uJl I)
ATTACH THEIR DI- SEf TJ IT.
1HAT WE AFE A RF' 1llEllf IAL CCIMI.1I.RII' , i01U
PFCO(41IZF THAT omFP C I f IE- HATE WI THIN TIIE 11; 1x 0`11`
E TeiPLI,HED 1`lOtl- C011FOPhII1`lG DErIGtIATIOHS T14AT Cull II_1I LE
CHAN(ZED.
6. THAT Ar F'F 7` ✓!.I_ or THr- rl. All SH(rilt i, !:(' I !`,
FIR;I ^•IEF' T DEVEI.OFE A FLAU 1 ,1I TH Will ""14 Al.l. c.i Il'.1 1 m U (:(m
Arf�CF .
3063
_. THAT WHILE ADOPTIt1G
THI'_ PLA1t
THE LAI F
hIIIIMETOt'
1 1`11-IMICIPALITIES MITIHIJE
TO"AVE A
SUBSTAHT IAL
INVI IJENCE
OVEP THEIR 0011 DE,TIM .
IN OTHER
WORD' MAI THE
CITY WILL
PFGUL_ATE THE USE OF THE
LAFID MID
THE L..N.C.I). THE
WATEP UHLE
-" ONE CONFLICTS WITH THE
OTHER,
SUCH AS F.Uf! OFF,
WETLANDS
ETC.
4. THAT PY AFrr0VAL CAF THIS FLAN 111E CI I1
TO DECI_AFF THAI IT I; 1`101 OUF IDEA TO IMPOSE: 1111 fl-All fill
OTHFF CTTIF" PUT THAT TIIF'i' WHFU AFFPOVIHG fill I I AH ' Il(uJl I)
ATTACH THEIR DI- SEf TJ IT.
1HAT WE AFE A RF' 1llEllf IAL CCIMI.1I.RII' , i01U
PFCO(41IZF THAT omFP C I f IE- HATE WI THIN TIIE 11; 1x 0`11`
E TeiPLI,HED 1`lOtl- C011FOPhII1`lG DErIGtIATIOHS T14AT Cull II_1I LE
CHAN(ZED.
6. THAT Ar F'F 7` ✓!.I_ or THr- rl. All SH(rilt i, !:(' I !`,
FIR;I ^•IEF' T DEVEI.OFE A FLAU 1 ,1I TH Will ""14 Al.l. c.i Il'.1 1 m U (:(m
Arf�CF .
3063
7 TIIAT IN TRYING TO SOLVE PROBLEMS Of Atli I:IIID
INVOLVING T14E LAKE IT WELCOMES THE EYPERTI£E OF TIIE
L.M.C.D., THE D.N.R., HENNEPIN COUNTY PARKS AND THE
1`11PRIEHAHA CREEL: WATERSHED DISTRICT ETC.
P. THAT WE FEALIZE THAT FAILURE TO ADOPT T11IS
NAMAGEPIEP►T rLAN WOULD JEOPARDIZE THE PRESENT INFLUENCES AND
CONTROL AFFORDED US THROUGH THE L.M.C.D.
P. THAT WE ARE CONFIDENT THAT THE LAVE PIINNET011VA
CITIES HAVE THE PROPER MOTIVATION FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE
LAKE AND WILL USE COMMON SENSE IM BALANCING THEIR CURRENT
LAYOUTS WITH THE SUGGESTIONS IN THE PLAN.
r
•
3064
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
LONG TERM MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Shoreland F,otection Review
REC O OCT 4 1990
Meeting Highlights
MEETING HELD: Thursday, September 20, 1990, Wayzata City Hall
PRESENT: City representatives Cliff Roberts, mayor; Council members Dick
Brown, Howie Bennis, Deephaven; Steve Smith, mayor, Mark Koegler,
Planner, Mound; Ann Perry, Phil Rosenquist, planners, Minnetonka;
Jerry Rockvam, mayor; Pat Osmonson, clerk; Alan Brixius, planner,
Spring Park; Al Oreson, city manager; Tom Young, planning
coordinator; David Iicht, planner, Wayzata; Nick Duff, mayor,
Woodland: Vern Haug mayor, Tonka Bay;
LMCD Directors Dave Cochran, Greenwood; Mary Bjorlin, Tonka
Bay; Doug Babcock, Spring Park; JoEllen Hurr, Orono; John
Lewman, Minnetrista; Tom Martinson, Wayzata; Bob Rascop,
Shorewood; Tom Reese, Mound; Executive Director Gene Strommen
MN DNR representatives John Stine, regional hydroligi;:; Ed Fick,
shoreland management hydrologist; Pete Otterson, supervisor,
shoreland management, all from Division of Waters;
Consultant David Arndorfer
INTRODUCTION -- The anticipated outcome of this meeting as described in the
meeting notice was intended as follows:
0 I. Further clarification of the need and appropriateness for the
Shoreland Protection segment of the Management Plan.
2• Establishment of a working agreement between the municipalities,
LMCD and DNR to cover issues which are not directly covered in the
present Management Plan, allowing the Plan to progress toward
adoption with assurance that critical needs are met.
3• Secure the understanding and support of the municipalities which
have not yet entered into Shoreland Rules Agreement to begin the
Rules adoption process required by the MN DNR by 7/31/91•
MN DNR PRESENTATION -- Stin welcomed this meeting as an opportunity for he and
the DNR staff present to learn more about the specific issues related to the
Shoreland Protection segment of the Long Term Management Program, and what can
be done to improve that segment.
Stine reviewed the state history on how shoreland rules came into being, starting
in 1969 when outstate shoreland rules were mandated by the legislature. In 1974
metropolitan cities were given the same mandate. Rules were published in 1976•
However, without funds to assist in the rules adoption, and subsequent provision
of needed staff to assure their implementation, many cities did not adopt the
rules. Recognizing this shortcoming, and further realizing shanges in shoreland
growth, the DNR began a review of the existing rules, resulting after some two -
plus years of review ar;d public hearings, a new set of Shoreland Rules adopted
by the state 7/31/89• Accompanying these rules was 92.2 million to assist local
governments in the adoption process.
LMCD's management plan development coincided with the states new Shoreland Rules.
As a re-lilt, LMCD was invited by the DNR to facilitate the adoption process among
the 14 Lake Minnetonka communities.
more .
SHORELAND PROTECTION REVIEW, 9/20/90, P. 2
MN DNR PRESENTATION {continued?
Addressing more direct lake - related issues of the Shoreland Protection segment
of LMCD's plan, Stine emphasized that development on the land has a definite
influence on water surface use and water quality.
The area under consideration for this immediate influence is 1,000' feet from
the ordinary high water level of the lake, known as the shoreland.
Section 6120.2600 of the new Shoreland Rules states in part . . . "The
uncontrolled use of shorelands adversely affects the public health, safety and
general welfare by contributing to pollution of public waters and by impairing
the local tax base. . . . The standards and criteria are intended to
preserve and enhance the quality of surface waters, conserve the economic and
1 natural environmental values of shorelands, and provide for the wise use of
water and related land resources of the state.
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM CITY AND OTHER REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT:
Licht, Wayzata, asked about funding LMCD is receiving for its Management Plan
from the DNR. Stine related that $40,000 has been pledged toward the $250,000
total cost. LMCD's agreement to facilitate the shoreland rules among the 14
cities includes a $15,000 reimbursement for consultant /staff time necessary to
carry out this adoption process. LMCD expects to engage a consultant for the
majority of this work.
What is LMCD's job once shoreland rules are adopted by each city-
While this question wes not directly answered at the meeting, it deserves
a reply based upon information in the PERSPECTIVE opening section of the Shore-
land Protection chapter, p. 41, paragraph 4, namely: LMCD's approach to
Shoreland protection "does not alter the traditional jurisdictions and powers
of local government on the lake. Instead, it depends on intergovernmental
agreements and long -term cooperation to achieve the stated goals and objectives.
Accordingly, protection of the lake from the adverse effects of
development and redevelopment requires a strong working partnership between
managing entities {municipalities and other shoreland- influencing agencies} and
the LMCD. The section on AJTHORITY, p. 42, also addresses LMCD's position in
this regard.
What if a city decides not to work through the LMCD on the shoreland rules
adoption process
Stine responded that in order to qualify for the flexibility provisions allowed
through LMCD's management program {which has been inserted as Item Z, Appendix C}
cities must work through the LMCD. Otherwise more stringent rules will be
applied to meet state -wide standards. Under the flexibility provision, for
example, some density transfer from another area within the shoreland may be
made to accommodate an area where a city determines it qualifies for greater
density. This type of transfer must be legally defined and preserved by
the cities with the knowledge of other landholders who might be restricted in
their future development potential.
A shoreland density example was illustrated for the City of Wayzata, noting
that the further away from shore, greater allowances for density are permitted.
30`L more . . .
SHORELAND.PROTECTION REVIEW, 9/20/90, P. 3
QUESTIONS /COMMENTS {continued)
Licht volunteered the position that their firm 'Northwest Associated Consul-
tants} and the City of Wayzata are not anti -LMCD. They are just not asking
LMCD to do planning for the city. Licht agrees density problems must be
recognized and determined how they can be accommodated in the LMCD plan.
Licht further added they do not have any parameters from which to come from --
they want to see the criteria in the management plan. Licht then questioned
the capacity of residential units within the shoreland area. He noted Wayzata
has determined it has excess development capacity of 108 units.
Licht added they still need criteria from a regional perspective of the lake
in LMCD's plan, for example, what percent of shoreland can Wayzata develop for
residential, commercial, multiple family, etc.?
Stine observed that such planning criteria requires some land use inventory data-
This would include:
1. What could be developed if comprehensive plans were fully achieved.
2. Communities must resolve this answere among or for themselves as to
what amount of development is appropriate.
Arndorfer stated that the development of such criteria is step two -- LMCD must
first resolve step one, namely adoption of the management plan. LMCD is not
poised to undertake involvement in establishing land use criteria in Arndorfer's
judgement. But the development of a consistent set of shoreland rules through
the proposed adoption process is a step in that direction. The Shoreland
Protection section is a series of goals as to how the cities are to get there,
Arndorfer added. He acknowledged further that specific studies may be
identified now but done later.
Alan Brixius said he sees the performance standards in Appendix C as too
restrictive. It either makes many properties non - conforming, or prohibits
some prospective development /redevelopment. {The flexibility provision as
noted in new Para Z is intended to avoid the non - conforming problem-1
Bernhardson expressed the concern that the LMCD plan may require cities to
amend their comprehensive plans. The extent that city comprehensive plans are
superior to LMCD's plan for shoreland rules as not been defined. Their council
is concerned that developers and future councils will insist on lowering shore -
land standards based upon other city's more liberal allowances.
Cliff Roberts believes shoreline protection can be construed as "zoning ". He
sees this as a "zoning grab" on the part of LMCD. {numerous statements in the
plan assure the cities that LMCD intends no such rolel. Roberts also sees the
funding alternatives as remote -- "hopes" -- for getting funding beyond the 14
lake cities. {The plan admits these will be challenges to secure, but supported
by broader public recogrition of the need, such as rioted in the recent Citizen'
Leage report on surface water management for metropolitan lakesl
Vern Haug noted that while Tonka bay has questioned the LMCD budget, it supports
LMCD overall. He does agree with Robert's observations on funding, and sees
LMCD as being under funded, under staffed.
Nick Duff sees the 14 cities as having an obligation to support the goal to
preserve the lake. The 14 cities are already subject to much regulation, and
they would much prefer to deal with LMCD. The lake is changing, work together 304
SHORELAND PROTECTION REVIEW, 9120.90, P. 4
QUESTIONS /COMMENTS {continued}
Pete Otterson noted for the DNR how the North Shore Management Plan was
developed bringing 3 counties and 4 cities together through a joint powers board-*
The plan has guided them into a position of unity. Otterson recognizes there
are different development patterns among Lake Minnetonka cities. Flexibility
among them is need as well as mutual approval.
Reese noted he is concerned about pollution coming from upland development.
Ann Perry stated Minnetonka's position as not finding a commonality for
land use as suggested in the Fhoreland Protection chapter. The r'.y objects to
Appendix C, and believes LMCD -0r ply be concerned {with shoreland develop -
mentil} as it relates to lake u: , , , .:er quality. {The plan states that lake
use and water quality are highly influenced by shoreland development and therefore
must be addressed in the plan}
A suggestion was proposed {source missed} that Appendix C be drooped entirely
from the plan with a statement that Shoreland Rules adoption by - the cities is a
significant responsibility of each city.
The plan could address how Shoreland Rules are to be adopted for each city's
special needs.
Mark Koegler stated Minnetonka's concern for mere assurance of flexibility with
the shoreland rules.
Licht stated he believes Appendix C has not been "hashed out" enough. He added
that the circumstances have changed since the shoreland rules were structured
in the Appendix C and now Wayzata sees what the problems it will have with it.
Arndorfer reminded the audience that nearly six months of study wentinto the
Shoreland Protection study, involving all 14 cities, with most in attendance
including some eie -ted officials as well as staff. The communications between
staff and councils apparently deserved more exchange to help them understand
that segment of the study.
Lewman noted Minnetrista pr '.,•s to work with LMCD than some higher level of
bureaucracy.
Stine concluded that the problems appear to be with Appendix C. Density is
a flexibility issue. Some further input is needed to resolve the differences
and DNR is willing to be of service in thi, area.
Cochran agreed there is still time and room to keep talking on the differences
pointed out today. He invited the cities to assist in presenting their ideas
and input toward resolution.
Depending upon on the LMCD Board's outcome on the over -all Long Term Management
Program review up for consideration 9/26, a move to bring the cities together
on this portion of the plan is an ap ^arent priority.
THE ABOVE SUMMARY HIGHLIGHTS COMMENTS PRESENTED BY PARTICIPANTS, IS NOT
INTENDED TO BE A COMPLETE DOCUMENTATION, BUT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
DISCUSSION, PREPARED BY EXECUTIVE. DIRECTOR GENE STROMMEN•
0 MINUTES - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - SEPTEMBER 20, 1990
The meeting was called to order at 7 AM, at Dr. Mark Brewer's of-
fice, 5581 Shoreline Drive, Mound, MN 55364. Members present:
Mark Brewer, Tim Kenealy, Fred Guttormson, Ben Marks, Mayor Steve
Smith. Also present: City Manager Ed Shukle.
Upon motion by Kenealy, seconded by Guttormson and carried
unanimously, the minutes of the August 15, 1990 meeting were
approved.
City Manager Ed Shukle reported on the soils reports update on
Lost Lake. He indicated that VanDoren, Hazard & Stallings, the
City's Planner, would be able to analyze the existing soils
reports done by Braun Engineering in 1984 at an estimated cost of
$1500 to $1800. Tim Kenealy indicated that he had looked at the
soils reports and had given some brief analysis to them. He
further indicated that he did not have the expertise to analyze
them in depth. The consensus was to have the City's soils
consultant, GME Consultants, Inc., provide a price on a soils
analysis. Questions were also asked with regard to the cost o"
pilings for up to a 2 story block building of 10,000 square feet.
The City Manager was going to check with the city planner on this
question.
The County Road 15 Beautification Plan was briefly reviewed.
Mayor Smith suggested that the City take the initiative and
obtain auotations on landscape plantings in front of the Lost
Lake area and in front of the lot that the Central Business
District and City of Mound lease from Dakota Rail (across from
the House of Moy). It was moved by Marks, seconded by Guttormson
and carried unanimously to pursue this by obtaining quotations
from area landscapers and to bring these recommendations to the
City Council for their review and consideration. The Parks and
Open Space Commission, is also supposed to be consulted on these
plantings. The City Manager is also to check with the Lions,
Jaycee's and Rotary with the regard to any monies that might be
available for these types of improvements, and to check with Mr.
Jim Robin, who designed the County Road 15 plan to get a price
for design of a plan on C.S.A.H. 110.
A review of the Community Block Grant Program was briefly
discussed. The City Manager is to check with Hennepin County as
to how much money would be available through the 2% loan program
previously administered by the City. Also, questions were asked
with regard to how the CDBG monies under this program could be
used, i.e., could they be used to beautify County Road 15 and /or
County Road 110?
• Mark Brewer then played the video that he and Paul Meisel did on
the downtown buildings.
Sat 9
MINUTES OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF SEPTEMBER 20, 1990
Other business discussed was personal delivery of the Downtown
Study report to businesses that were surveyed as part of the
report. It was agreed that each member of the commission would
personally delivery a Downtown Study report to the business that
they surveyed on their own. The Ci Manager is to get the list
of businesses surveyed, get the reports copied and the reports
and list out to the EDC so that the personal deliveries can
begi7.
Also discussed was a possible retreat that the EDC, City Council,
Planning Commission and Park and Open Space Commission could hold
on i Saturday or other convenient time in the near future. This
matter was continued until the next meeting. The next meeting is
scheduled for Thursday, October 19, 1990, at 7 AM, at C.R.
Manufact�iring, '338 Shoreline Boulevard, Mound, in the conference
room.
Upon motion by Brewer, seconded by Guttormson and carried
unanimously, the meeting was adjourned at 8:4; AM.
R pectfull submitted,
d SC kIe
City Manager
ES: .s
•
•
•
30 710 2
. Dear Contributor: 9/30/90
RFC'D OCT 5 iY90
! want to thank you for donating to the Eurasian Watermilfoil
fund for Dutch Lake. This year the lake was treated twice
with the chemical 2 - -4 -13 by Lake Restoration. 2 -4 -D is a
very potent checimal that not only kills the milfoH but any
other vegetation in the area being treated. It is also
recommended that the fish not be taken for consumption
from the treated waters for three days. The first treatment
was in June it included the entire south shore and a small
area of the north shore by Camp Christmas Tree. In August,
a much smaller area on the south shore was treated. It
appears that the inilfoil is under control, but the lake will
require close attention. Anyone finding Eurasion
Watermilfoil in Dutch lake please mark the spot and contact
Gary Nordstrom. Eurasian Watermilfoil has a redishjamber
stem and the leaves look like a fine feather, If you are
• unsure what millfoil looks like please contact me at
472 -7234. Again thank you, everyones efforts have been
greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
JGary tordstrom
n
LJ
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
WATER STRUCTURES & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE
A G E N D A
7:30 a.m., Saturday, October 13, 1990
Shurewood City Hall
5755 Country Club Road
VO OCT 9 6-j0
1. Chapman Place commercial marina agreement review (continuation
from 9 -8 -90 meeting), and presentation by applicant, Robert
Cuthili.
2. Communication with Lakeside Marina for non - compliance with
temporary low water variance.
3. Review of the Amenity Study, re- assessing the amenity require-
ments for slips in excess of 1:50 density.
0 4. Excelsior Bay Yacht Club: EAW status and response by new
marina operator.
5. 1990 -1991 deicing license applications per initial response
thru 10 -1 -90, list attached.
6. Other business
10 -5 -90
•
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT /
Oct- 3, 1990
•
TO: Dock Committee, Counsel Charlie LeFevere
FROM: Executive Director Gene Strommen
SUBJECT: Chapman Place Operator Agreement Review
LeFevere's analysis of the Chapman Place Assn license agreement with Scenic
Lawn and Landscape summarized in his letter of 7/16/90 cites some concerns for
changes made in the Agreement and Grant of License for the new marina operator
of a public marina located on the Chapman Place Assn• property and Lakeshore.
Upon initial review with the committee at its 9/8/90 meeting, the executive
director met with Chapman Place representative Robert Cuthill, original
applicant for the license, tc dis�: these concerns. The conclusion from
these discussions relating to these concerns are:
1• New paragraph lfd} states the association will be providing the docks
and related equipment to the licensee.
Cuthill reports that upon conclusion of the 1989 operating season
with Waterfront Specialties, that operator declined to renew the contract
for 1990• As part of the agreement with Waterfront Specialties, which is
the firm that also supplied the docks, Chapman Place took the option to
purchase the docks to preserve them for its future use, rather than turn
them back and require a more costly search for new docks for 1990•
2. License fee payable by licensee to the association is changed from
45% to 75% of gross slip rentals.
It is apparent that the change of fees paya`jle is a result of the
association owning the docks and obligated to pay for them through its
own purchase agreement at the time of acquiring them from Waterfront
Specialties.
3• Th- previous license agreement provided for slip rental rates to be
set at an amount, which, for 27 slips, would generate at least $40,000 in
gross revenues plus increases necessary to pay for increased insurance
premiums. Further fee increases had to be agreed upon by the association.
New paragraph 15 calls for all ental fees for slips to be agreed upon
by the association.
Again, because of the association now having the investment in the
docks, they moved to control the fee structure to assure the investment
in the docks was covered.
4• Minimum receipts for the licensee in the previous agreement guaran-
teed that the share of gross revenues of the licensee would be at least
$19,000• Paragraph 17 of new license guarantees the licensee only
52,000 above operating costs.
T'-is further appears to be a factor of the dock ownership/investment-
CHAPMAN PLACE OPERATOR AGREEMENT REVIEW, 10/3/90, P. 2
S. Term of the license has been reduced from five years to one year.
• Cuthill reports that was the maximum term the new operator was
willing to commit to the association for the first year. The associa-
tion is expecting to enter into a multi -year agreement starting in
1991•
Upon review with LeFevere, the key issue which affects the association's
control over the marina operation which has changed since the 1989 agreement
with Waterfront Specialties is the dock ownership. The agreement has now
moved a step closer to being a management contract, rather than an arms -
length independent operator of the intended commercial marina.
Cuthill has noted that it was not their understanding that the association
could not own the docks, which is mentioned in their license agreement with
Waterfront Specialties in 1989 as to their option to purchase the docks.
Such a purchase option is described in paragraph 8 of the original contract
relating to contract termination, which states in part . . . the association
shall have the option of purchasing the docks and equipment for a reasonable
price from WSI prior to the expiration of the thirty {30} day period (follow-
ing termination of the agreement }. Paragraph 15 of the original contract
also covers "Right to Purchase" which is a provision for the association to
purchase the docks at the conclusion of the then five -year contract with
Waterfront Specialties.
LMCD Board did in fact approve the license March 28, 1990 noting the minor
• change in the operator's agreement. Subsequent review by LMCD counsel as
of 7/16/90 points out the significance of these changes.
Robert Cuthill has volunteered his willingness to appear before the Dock
Committee arH review the proceedings to satisfy LMCD that it believes it is
meeting the terms of its order of 2/22/89. The item is scheduled for the
10/13/90 .ock Committee for that purpose.
•
Hu HIES &. CRAVE
R 0-IlOrne)% at Isw
ORFRI A. Aunt
r 11'1 1). R1FRI \(111
RI W %11) II. R 1111
M (NI J. RR NDF\
SIFIII1V% J. 81
ROOF R1 (.( %R1%o.%
( IIRISII \F %I. ( IIAI f.
ROOF .RI L. DA%IOSON
JIMIN R. DF.1V
RIFSERI J. OF.IKF:
MAR1 C. DORMS
JFFtREI L%(;
SIFFANIF
1) AI III I.. (: R. \1 F V
( ORRItit. A. Ifum
JOII\ (:. Hot 111.F.R
J AS1 F.%S. Ilol tlFs
July 16, 1990
Mr. Eugene Strommen
Executive Dire(
Lake Minnetonka Conservation
District
402 East Lake Street
Wayzata, MN 55391
• RE: Chapman Place Marina
Dear Gene:
17J 1•ilhhun ( enter, % innesp ilk. Minnewl• 4 "02
11121377 -9
1)%%InJ ht \\1M
F acsimile 16121717.9110
1 1N \
I%
II 111ill\ 1.1 Ut
k% 1 \L I I
J1 1 11 :. I %%%I I R
11 %RI 111 1 11 11 1 141
JI11\ %I I I I 11 RI. IR
ROOF N 1 J 11\1111 i
11RITER'S DIRE( I DIAL
1 %I R 1 K. Mot I I I
1)1\111 R \II III\
11 1N8 tN %1. VON I11rn111
%I %R1 I R % %( I I Ilk t l 1
.I \VI \ \I.' IHI111111\
\1111♦ \I. 1 1111\
337 -9215
Jt1n \.► 11111 \1 \u\ IN
11HHI \l. 111 RIMINI
RII \ \11 I . N II AI\.
You have asked that I review a proposed license agreement between Chapman
Place Association, Inc. F_; Scenic Lawn and Landscape, Inc. to advise you whether,
in my opinion, the rela-,ionship between the licensee and the licensor continues to
be one which satisfies the requirements of the LMCD Code.
This marina is operated at the site of the former Surfside Marina. The marina was
operated for innny years as a commercial marina in conjunction with a restaurant.
The marina included 51 slips, many of which were licensed as transient slips fo° use
by patrons of the restaurant. Some tim? ago, the site was sold and a condominium
project was constructed. The prior owner of the site continued to operate a
commercial marina at the site under a lease agreement. Because the restaurart
was discontinued, the Board determined that there was no justification for a
continuation of the transie slips.
An arbitration pro ;119 between the marina operator and the condominium
association resulted in a determination that the association was entitled to reenter
the prope, ty and reclaim the right to construct docking facilities at the site.
Because the property wns then owned by a condominium association, it would not
have been entitled to construct and maintain more than one boat per fifty feet of
shoreline without a special density license if the docks were constructed and
• operated by the association itselr. However, if all dockage rights continued to be
leased to an ind ^pendent entity operating a commercial marina, the facility would
be able to Innintnin its grandfAttiered status.
Therefore, the association entered into a license agreement with Waterfront
Specialties, Inc. Several changes to the license agreement which were
recommended by my office were made in the license agreement. With these
Is change, the Board concluded that the operation continued to qualify as a
commercial marina.
The applicant has now submitted an amended license agreement, with a new
licensee (Scenic Lawn and Landscape, Inc.). The Board must now determine
whether the proposed relationship between the licensee and the licensor continues
to qualify the facility as a commercial marina. That Is, the Board must determine
whether the licensee Is operating a bona fide commercial marina operated by an
independent licensee under an arms length commercial transaction, or whether the
proposed relationship between the licensee and the licensor is merely a subterfuge
In which the licensee is simply an operating agent for an outlot association facility.
This question must be answered after considering various aspects of the
relationship between the licensee and the licensor such as the amount of control
exercised by the homeowner's association, which party provides docks and
equipment, the method of determining rental payments, the extent to which the
licensee can secure a reAsonable commercial profit from the venture, and the term
of the license.
With respect to one important factor, the license agreement continues to satisfy
the requirements of the licensing order adopted by the Board in 1989. All
provisions relating to priority of slip rentals (i.e. not allowing any advantage in
securing slip space to members of the homeowner's association) continue to be
Incorporated in the license document. However, a number of changes in the license
agreement appear to change the nature of the relationship so that It is now less
• like a commercial lease for space to operate a marina and more like a management
contract for an outlo' association marina. These changes are as follows:
1. Under new paragraph 1(d) the association will be providing the docks
and related equipment to the licensee.
2. The license fee payable by the licensee to the association under
paragraph 4 is changed from 45% to 75% of gross slip rentals.
3. In paragraph 16 of the previous license agreement, slip rental rates
were to be set at an amount, which, for 27 slips, would generate at least
$40,000 in gross revenues plus increases necessary to pay for increased
insurance premiums. Further fee increases had to be agreed upon by the
association. Under new paragraph 15, all rental fees for slips must be
agreed upon by the association.
4. The minimum receipts for the licensee under paragraph 14 of the
previous agreement essentially guaranteed that the share of gross revenues
of the licensee would be at least $19,000. Under paragraph 17 of the new
license, the licensee is guaranteed only $2,000 above operating costs.
5. The term of the license has been reduced from five years to one year.
Without more detailed information about slip rentals, operating expenses, and costs
is of operation, it is difficult to determine what the effect of the proposed changes
will be. however, at least superficially, the changes appear to be moving toward a
simple management agreement and farther from a bona fide arms length
commercial lease for a marina site. 'Therefore, I am not enm fort i3hle
recommending to the Board that I find the proposed license ngregiment to be in
order. It is possible that additional financial information would put these chnnites
in a somewhat different light, and the applicant may wish to provide such
information if it believes that such information would tend to pro' eft this is a
bona fide c , )mmercial lease -type transaction. 1lternktively, the ' 4iennt rnriv
wish to change the terms of the license ngree to estahlish the marinn as A
bona fide commercial marina. Finally, the applicant may wish to submit this issue
in its current form to the Board for its consideration.
If you have any further questions, please feet free to give me a call.
Very truly yours,
Charles L. LeFevere
C1, L:sg
LK 110 -4
REC:LIVLi ,
40 JUL 1'i i T)0
L.M.C.0