Loading...
1978-01-17 CC Agenda PacketCITY OF MOUN~ Mound, Minn~_~ota Mound City Council January 17, 1978 City Hall 7:30 P.M. CM 78-12 /. ~. Public Hearing - HUD Funds - Year IV Pg. 163-186 CM 78-14 & 15~.,~'. Meeting with Con~issions - Slide Presentation on Tax Increment Financing Pg. 162 Tuxedo Easements Pg. 158-161 Information Memorandums/Misc. Pg. 113-157 Committee Reports LAKE MINNETONKA P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Pres, · FI. Dale Palmatier · Albert L Lehman · James S. Russell · Jean Williams / January 11, 1977 L NOTICE OF MEETING OF BOARD OF MANAGERS Thursday, January 19, 1978 7:30 P. M. Wayzata City Hall AGENDA ENCLOSED .2.00 AGENDA Minnehaha Creek Watershed District January 19, 1978 1. Call to order; Present, Absent, Staff 2. Reading and approval of minutes of previous meeting. Regular meeting of December 15, 1977. 3. Hearing of permit applications: A. 76-70. E. Nelson, Beachside Development Company, Multiple dwellings, east side of Lost Lake - Mound. B. 78-1. D. Owen, 320 South Ferndale Road, Shoreline rip-rap, Browns Bay of Lake Minnetonka - Wayzata. C. 78-2. B. Ahr, Avocet Lane, Shoreline rip-rap and setback variance, Jennings Bay of Lake Minnetonka- Mound. D. 78-3. Lake Minnetonka Homes, Inc., Lake setback variance, Enchanted Island, Lake Minnetonka - Shorewood. E. 78-4. J. Lawrence, "Tanglewood", Grading and drainage plan - Orono. F. 78-5. N. Ruehl, Polynesian Restaurant on Lake Minnetonka - Excelsior. G. 78-6. G. Morrill, Outlot at Division Street and Third Avenue, Wildlife ponding - Excelsior. 4. Hearing of requests or petitions by public for action by Watershed District. A. City of Plymouth request for boundary adjustment 5. Hearing and discussion of matters of general public interest A. Metropolitan Council Overall Plan Guidelines 6. Reports of Treasurer, Engineer and Attorney: A. Treasurer's Report - Mr. Russell B. Engineer's Report - Mr. Holmquist a. Cooperative Agreement Projects C. Attorney's Report - Mr. Macomber 193 e Unfinished Business. ne B. C. D. New Business. Adjournment. EPA Grant Fund Report St. Louis Park Floodplain Zoning Mailing list review Insurance Program - Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts Permit Review and coordination with municipalities Decen~ber 15, 1977 The meeting was called to order on December 15, 1977 by Chairman Cochran at 7:30 p.m. at the Wayzata City Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota. Managers present: Cochran, Lehman, Palmatier and Williams Manager absent: Russell Also present were board advisors Holmquist and Macomber. ~pproval of Minutes The minutes of the regular meeting of November 17, 1977, were reviewed. Following discussion, it was moved by Palmatier, seconded by Lehman, that on page 5, under the heading "Permit Procedure Review", the sentence "Upon vote, the motion carried" be added to the end of the paragraph. Upon vote, the motion carried. Carlberg and Lundeen, Grading/Drainage Plan, Dairy Queen Store, T.H. 12 and CSAH '19 -' Medina;' Application No.' 76-'134 The engineer reviewed a permit issued by the managers November 29, 1976, approving a grading and drainage plan for the property. The engineer advised the managers that a retention pond called for by the approved drainage plan was not constructed during 1977. The applicant appeared and explained the reasons for delay in construction of the retention pond. Following dis- cussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Palmatier, that the permit be extended through July 1, 1978 with the condition that the applicant undertake construction of the retention pond at the earliest practicable date in 1978 and that said construction be completed by July 1, 1978. Upon vote, the motion carried. Mildred Thacker, Install Pond Drain to Lafayette Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Tonka Bay; Application No. 77-144 The engineer reviewed the application to construct an outlet drain in accordance with a permit previously issued September 20, 1976 and extended by the district September 19, 1977. The engineer recommended approval of the application conditioned upon approval by the City of Tonka Bay. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Palmatier, that the application be approved as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. 197 Page Two December 15, 1977 M. D. Grady, Replace Retaining Wall, Carson Bay, Lake Minnetonka - Deephaven; Application NO. '77-145 · The engineer reviewed the application of M. D. Grady to remove an.existing limestone retaining wall and regrade th.~ shoreline to a sloping bank. The engineer advised the manage.~:s that the data submitted by the applicant did not accurately in- dicate present elevations, nor the grade of slope as proposed, and that lacking such data it was not possible to determine whether the proposal would adequately prevent shoreline erosion. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Williams, that the application be approved on the condition that the appli- cant submit to the engineer for his review and approval a new profile showing present elevations and the grade of the proposed slope add that the elevations and proposed grade be approved by the engineer prior to the commencement of any construction. Upon vote, the motion carried. Hennepin County Park Reserve District, Public Access on Zumbra Lake, Carver Park Reserve - Laketown Township; Application No. 77-146 ' ' ~ The engineer reviewed the application of the Hennepin County Park Reserve District to construct public access on Zumbra Lake and recommended approval of the application as submitted. Following discussion it was moved by Palmatier, seconded by Lehman, that the application be approved as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote, the motion carried. Hennepin County Department of Transportation, Project 7515, Improve Intersection CSAH 73 and 16 - Minnetonka; Application No. '77-147 The engineer reviewed the application of the Hennepin County Department of Transportation to replace a culvert under County State Aid Highway 73 in connection with roadway improve- ments. The engineer recommended approval of the application as submitted. Following discussion it was moved by Palmatier, seconded by Lehman, that the application be approved as recom- mended by the engineer. City of Plymouth Request to Adjust District Boundary The managers reviewed the request from James Willis, Plymouth City Manager, to adjust a portion of the Watershed District boundary within Shiloh 2nd Addition within the City of Plymouth. The attorney reviewed the applicable procedure, whereby the district is required to petition the Minnesota Water Resources Boar~ to amend the boundary. Following dis- cussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Williams, that the attorney prepare a proposed resolution and petition to amend the boundary to the Water Resources Board for review by the managers at the next regular meeting. Upon vote, the motion carried. ! 9 0 Page 3 December : ~ .... ~ CitY of St. Louis Park Floodplain Zoning Ordinance The managers reviewed a memorandum from -khe a~torney and the engineer summarizing modifications made by a r,~c~nt amendment to the St. Louis Park Floodplain Zoning O):dinance. The managers requested that the engineer and the attorney ad- vise the managers at the next regular meeting regarding what procedures should be followed to adopt recently revised flood- plain maps prepared by the United States Geological Survey and directed that further consideration Of the memorandum be defer- red until the next regular meeting of the managers. Communication from Prior Lake - Spring L. ake Watershed District . ....T~..e mana~ers, rev~iewed the memorandum from prior Lake- Spring Lake Watershed District requesting a copy of the district's rules and regulations. The engineer was directed to respond to the inquiry and to provide a copy of the watershed district's regula- tions to the Prior Lake-Spring Lake Watershed District. Treasurer's Report President Cochran distributed the treasurer's monthly fund report dated December 15, 1977, a copy of which is attached hereto. Following discussion it was moved by Palmatier, seconded by Lehman, that the report be approved subect to the following modification of page 1 of 4 of said report: That the statement for services rendered from the district's engineers and the district's attorney dated December, 1977, be shown as accounts payable at December 15, 1977, and that the amounts shown on page 1 of 4 be reduced by the amount of the Decc~er bills from the engineer and the attorney. Upon vote, the motion carried. Robert J. Lapic and James Nolan of Robert J. Lapic Co. appeared before the managers to respond to certain inquiries made by the managers with respect to the form of the financial report. The managers expressed a desire to add a column to page 2 of 4 of the monthly report in order to. show actual tax receipts to date. Mr. Lapic'indicated that this modification Will be made in future statements. The president then distributed the treasurer's monthly EPA Grant Fund Report dated December 31, 1977, a copy of which is attached hereto. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Palmatier, that the report be approved and the bills paid as set forth in that report. Upon vote, the motion carried. The engineer and the accountant advised the managers that a summary of the present status of the EPA Project fund was being prepared for review by the managers pursuant to the direction of the managers at the November 17, 1977 meeting. Page Four December 15, 13.;7 Cooperative A~reement' Projects · ~,~ John Gross of the Creekside chapter of the ~ League~ of America appeared before the managers regarcti~-~:3 posed headwaters control structure management policy the managers on November 17, 1977. Mr. Gross stated that his group objected to what he considered the apparent lack of a policy goal with respect to certain areas of the proposed manage- ment policy. Mr. Gross stated that it was not clear from the proposed management policy, whether during the spring and summer months, an effort would be made to keep the lake level ~oward the higher elevation, with possibly lower creek flows, or whether an effort would be' made to maintain creek flows with possibly lower'-lake elevations. The .managers.. requested that Mr..-.Gross submit his comments in writing to the district for further consideration. The managers also indicated that a joint hear- ing will be held early in 1978 with the Department of Natural Resources regarding the proposed headwaters control structure and the proposed management policy. The managers encouraged Mr. Gross to participate in the upcoming public hearing. Mr. Gross further offered the assistance of the Creek- side chapter to the district in moving the projects along to a prompt conclusion. The managers thanked Mr. Gross for his com- ments and his offer of assistance. The attorney advised the managers that the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, on November 29, 1977, adopted resolution #77-11-1155 adopting a position paper on the pro- posed headwaters control structure dated October 20, 1977. A copy of the resolution is attached hereto. The managers'noted that the proposed management policy adopted by the board of managers on November 17, 1977 had been distributed to all of the petitioning municipalities, all of the municipalities on the lake, and to public officials and interest- ed citizens. Pursuant to the direction of the managers at the last regular meeting, the engineer reviewed a draft amendment to the preliminary engineering report previously prepared in August, 1974. The engineer advised the managers that the amendment evaluates the feasibility and practicality of use of alternate site III (Gray's Bay dam site) for the.headwaters control struc- ture and provides a current engineering proposal and. preliminary cost estimates for the structure at that site. The engineer also advised the managers that the amendment to the preliminary engineering report describes minor revisions made in projects 2, 4 and 5 requested by the affected municipalities and provides current cost estimates for all presently proposed projects. Following extensive discussion and modifications to the draft, it was moved by Palmatier, seconded by Lehman, that the amendment to the preliminary engineering report dated December, Page Five December 15, 1977 1977, as amended by the managers, be ~dopted ~,nd approved by the managers and be .made a part of the preliminary engineering .: ~port on the creek"improvement projects; further, that the preli~L~. :.ary. engineering 'report, as adopted, be transmitted as required law to ~the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wate. rs, and the Minnesota Water Resources Board for their reports pur- suant to Minn.' Stat. ~112.48, subd. 3. Upon vote, the motion carried. The attorney advised the managers that the attorneY for the Department of Natural Resources had forwarded a proposed notice of hearing to the attorney for the district for review and comment, .and that the district's attorney had submitted com- ments'and revisions to,the DNR~attorneys. The~attorney-fu~her - ' advised the managers that the DNR wishes to schedule the hearing for early February, 1978, in order to allow the Department ade- quate time to review the district's preliminary engineering report and prepare its report prior to the hearing. The attorney also advised the managers that the Corps of Engineers had been advised of the present status of the project and that' the Corps of Engineers had expressed a desire to participate jointly with the DNR in connection with the hearing. The attorney advised the managers that the DNR will coordinate with the Corps of Engi- neers as to Corps activity. President Cochran reported that he, Manager Lehman and the district's engineer had appeared before a meeting of. the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District to review the proposed headwaters control structure policy statement dated November 17, 1977. The managers directed the attorney to confirm with the DNR the date of the hearing, to work with the DNR in preparation of a joint notice of hearing and to take such other steps as are required preparatory to the hearing. The managers also directed the engineer and the attorney to commence preparation of such documents, testimony and exhibits as will be required for use at the hearing and directed that a working session be held to review drafts of such documents early in January, 1978. Minnehaha Creek Obstructions Jim Ennenga of the Creekside chapter of the Izaac Walton League of America appeared before the managers and requested the district's assistance with respect to removal of certain obstruc- tions in the bed of Minnehaha Creek within St. Louis Park. Mr. Ennenga reviewed his report which had been submitted to the mayor of the City of St. Louis Park. The managers directed the engineer to prepare a letter to the city indicating that the district would look favorably upon a request to use a portion of the 1978 Water Maintenance an~ Repair Fund monies for creek obstruction removal in St. Louis Park. Page Six December 15, 1977 Hennepin County Sanitary Landfill Sit~ Candidates The engineer reported that he had received a document from Hennepin County identifying numerous candidate Sites for a proposed Hennepin County ~'~anitary landfill. The engineer advised the managers that one of the candidate sites identified was partly within the watershed district on its northerly boun- dary, adjacent to the Morris T. Baker Park Reserve within the City of Medina. Water Level Recorders The engineers reviewed the memorandum of the engineer dated December 7, 1977 indicating a problem with vandalism of the district's water level recorders. The engineer recommended place- ment of signs, to be placed adjacent to the recorder boxes to indicate the contents of the box in order to discourage vandalism. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Palmatier. that the engineer be authorized to order identifying signs as described in the memorandum. Department of Water Resources Proposed Rules The attorney advised the managers that he had received a copy of the report of the hearing examiner regarding proposed Department of Natural Resources rules governing permits to change the course, current or cross-section of public waters. The attor- ney stated that a memorandum would be forthcoming summarizing the modifications made and forwarding a copy of the examiner's report to the managers. Corps of. Engineers Litigation The attorney reported that Judge Alsop, on November 23, 1977, had requested that the parties advise him of their position with respect to certain issues raised by recently promulgated regulations of the Corps of Engineers. The attorney indicated that a response was prepared and submitted to the federal dis- trict court on December 5, 1977. Agenda Format The managers reviewed the present form of meeting agenda and noted that the present format provides space for note-taking on the agenda copy itself. The managers were of the opinion that this aspect of the agenda was unnecessary, in that interested par- ties could take notes separately from the agenda and that eliminat- ing this element would reduce the number of pages required for distribution to interested persons. The managers directed that future agendas be prepared without the space for taking of notes. Page Seven December 15, 1977 Adjournment There being no further business to come before the meeting, Chairman Cochran declared the meeting adjourned at 12:50 a.m. Respectfully submitted, .~ H. Dale Palmatier, Secretary_ Telephone 473-7357 January 4, 1978 CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66 * Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 · Municipal Of ,~es On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka V? - Citizens of the City of Orono Subject: Proposed Ring Route Segment Dear Citizens: At the direction of the City Council, the City Staff has set a third public hearing for January 23, 1978 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers to receive citizen input on the proposed planning and possible construction of a segment of the ring route. The construction of this ring route segment would be the first step in reducing the impact of traffic with its inherent polluting effects upon the County Road No. 15 scenic parkway corridor and Lake Minnetonka between Navarre and Wayzata. The proposed segment of the ring route under consideration at this time is a connecting link between the intersection of County Roads No. 19 and No. 84 and the intersection of County Road No. 6 and Watertown Road. This new roadway segment of approximately 9/10 of a mile is proposed to be constructed under the Municipal State Aid program utilizing State funds allocated to the City for rOadway construction and upgrading. As proposed, the construction of this ring route segment would necessitate the acquisition of private lands but would not require the removal of any existing residences. A sketch of the location of the proposed right-of-way is on file with the City Administrator and will be available for review at the City offices and at the public hearing on January 23, 1978. The attendance of all interested parties is encouraged. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO WRB/as NOTICE OF PUBLIC ttEARING NOTICE is hereby given that the Orono City Council will hold a third public hearing in the City Council Chambers on Monday, January 23, 1978 at 7:30 P.M. to receive citizen input on the proposed route which is being considered at this time for a connecting link between the intersection of County Roads No. 19 and No. 84 and the intersection of County Road No. 6 and Watertown Road. All persons wishing to be heard will appear at this time. Dated: January 4, 1978 CITY OF ORONO BY:~~ Council ' /$/' Waltei~_~./~.e'n-~n ~ City ~inistra~or ~ &si J. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota January 13, 1978 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-12 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager HUD Funds - Year IV - Public Hearing The Park Commission has had a public hearing and a discussion meeting on suggestions to spend the estimated $100,000 th~ City should receive for Year IV HUD Funds. The Council Public Hearing is scheduled for January 17th. The Park Commission recommendations for expenditures are listed below and also appear in the Park Commission minutes of January 5, 1978: Note: x Housing Rehabilitation x Island Park Hall Completion Island Park * Community Center Addition x Community Center Ramp * Development of Avalon Park x Planning & Administration x Clearing lots for elderly * Day Care Program (Copy of request attached) $50,000. 10,000. 5,000. 10,000. 1,000. 10,000. 15,000. 2,000. 20,000. Possibly the Community Center addition and the Day.Care Program will not qualify for funding. Qualifications for Funds: The HUD rules seemingly become more restrictive each year. Now only 25% can be spent on other than Housing, Elderly or Handi- capped unless it is justified that the funds are going to a low income area. Low Income Areas - In order to determine if the Island Park and Three Points areas qualify for low income area expenditures, the County sug- gested a questionnaire be mailed to residents. A copy of the question- naire sent each area is attached. Hopefully the answers will be back by the meeting of the 17th. The County developed the questionnaire which was distributed by the City. Eligible Projects - Eligible projects are set out in Federal Regulations 570.201. After the original Park Commission hearing, the Hennepin County representative, in a letter dated December 16, outlined his feeling on the Day Care request and from his view point, expenditures for bike hike paths will be difficult to prove under the HUD 51% rule (That is that the facility will be used 51% by the poor, etc.). A copy of the Federal COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-12 HUD Funds - Year IV - Public Hearing January 13, 1978 - Page 2 Register is included should the Council be interested. Prior Years' Funds: Attached is an outline of prior years' funds still unexpended which shows there is still $29,796.00 available for Island Park and $32,000 for Three Points. Expenditure of these funds await d~finite plans to be recommended by the Park Commission. Leonard L. Kopp ~ fP/:~ Minutes of MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION January 5, ]978 PRmSENT. Chairman }{al Larson, Cathy Bailey, Jon Lynott, Toni Case, Pat Shay, Ed Hasek, Council Rep. Ben Withhart, City Planner Don Levens, Public Works Dir. Bob Minor, Sec. Karene Uhe AUDIENCE: Pat Maltz, ~eston~a School-age Day Care Eugene Hodge, Mound Westonka Hist'orical Society HUD PUBLIC HEARING There was considerable discussion of the proposed 25%/?5% HUD ruling as described in ~2/]6/?? letter from James Ford. E. Ho~dge presented ' a request for HUD funding of addition to community center for the Historical Society. **Bailey moved to submit the following revised proposed list of HUD Year IV expenditures to City Council: x Housing Rehabilitation $50,000 x Island Park Hall ]0,000 Completion of I.P. Park 5,000 ~ Community Center addition ~O,OOO x Community Center ramp ~,000 ~ Development of Avalon Park 10,O00 x Planning and Administration 1~,OOO x Clearing of lots for elderly ~,000 ~ Day care program '20~OOO x Item exempt from 25%/75% ruling * Item possibly will not qualify for HUD funding Lynott seconded and vote was unanimous. **Bailey moved that Ben ~ithhart ask park planners who would be inter- ested in drawing up plans for Island Park and Three Points Park to attend the next Park meeting on Jan. ~9,~978. Case seconded and vote was unanimous. **Larson moved to recommend that winter dockage or storage not be allowed on Highland Park lake access because of the sliding during the winter do~m the ~ill to the lake. Hasek seconded and vote ~as unanimous. The remainder of the evening ?;as spent on Committee meetings. 'i 8 4 January ~, 1978 The Mound Weston~.ra Historical Society wishes to propose the construction of a two-level area addtion to the south end of the con~nity center, This will include an il-course basement ~rea, 24' by 2~i' and an above ground area, 24' x 2~~ bo be co~structed beneath the roof area at the south end of the existing structure. An approximate estimate for this construction would be about $10,000.00. We ~...oula like to apply fcr this £rom the ~UJD funds designated for Museums. Respect~tlly submitted, Eugene H. Hodge President 53-1.1 MAYWOOO ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 5.5364 Dear Resident: January 11, 1978 TELEPHONE (6,]2) 472-115.5 The City of Mound, in cooperation with 36 other Hennepin County Communities, is applying for tlUD Community Development Block Grant Program funding assist- ance. Under the new regulations for the Program a number of projects are eligible if and only if the majority of nearby residents live in households with gross, combined household incomes of $15,520 or less. The City is considering the following projects which will require ~ocumenta- tion of area residents income. To assist the City, you are requested to com- plete the attached survey and return it to the City Hall by January 16, 1978. Unless a high'percentage response is received from this survey the City may be unable to receive any funding assistance. 'Therefore, your early completion and return of this survey form is essential. CHILD CARE PROGRAM: To proVid~'~ina~ci~l" assistance to low income families nee~-- lng child care while the parents are at work or in training. The program assists parents in achieving self-support by helping with child care costs. A greater share of the child care costs are paid when the family's income is lower and that share decreases as income increases. COMPLETIOH OF ISLAND PARK: To upgrade and fully utilize the park recreational area through improved drainage, physical design, installation of lighting, play equip- ment and surface restoration. DEVELOPMENT OF AVALON PARK: To improve and beautify the area on Phelps Island as a community space for swimming and plcnicing. ~ The information being sought is only for purposes of'determi, ning the eligibility of certain neighborhoods within the City for project funding. The City neither needs nor desires to be able to trace these responses to particular households; we only need this information for your neighborhood as a whole. If you have any questions regarding this survey, please codtact Don Levens at City Hall, telephone 472-1155 between 8:09 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. Detach and return this portion of survey: 1. Was the combined gross annual income of all wage earners in your household in the last year, above or below $15,520.007 Above Be 1 ow . ...................... ,-1., 6 --" -------'-"-"'---" INDIAN BURIAL MOUND~ 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 Dear Resident: TELEPHONE January 11, 1978 The City of Mound, in cooperation with 36 other Hennepin County Communities, is applying for tIUD Community Development Block Grant Program funding assist- ance. Under the new regulations for the Program a number of projects are eligible if and only if the majority of nearby residents live in households with gross, combined household incomes of $15,520 or less. The City is considering the following projects which will require documenta- tion of area residents income. To assist the City, you are requested to com- plete the attached survey and return it to the City Hall by January 16, 1978. Unless a high percentage response is received from this survey the City may be unable to receive any funding assistance. Therefore, your early completion and return of this survey form is essential. CHILD CARE PROGRAM: To provide financial assistance to low income families need- ing child care while the parents are at work or in training. The program assists parents in achieving se?f-support by helping with child care costs. A greater share of the child care costs are paid when the family's income is lower and that 'Share decreases as income increases. The information being sought is only for purposes of determining the eliglbility of certain neighborhoods within the City for project funding. The City neither needs nor desires to be able to trace these responses to particular households; we only need this information for you~ neighborhood as a whole, o, · If you have any questions regarding this survey, please contact Don Levens at City Hall, telephone 472-1155 between 8:09 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. Detach and return this portion of survey: 1. Was the combined gross annual income of all wage earners in your household in the last year, above or below ~15,520.007 ~ Above Be 1 ow 2. How many persons presently live in your household? Management Services 2309 Governmen~nter, Minneapolis, MN 55487 HE NNE PIN COUNTY 16 December 1977 Mr. Donald Levens City of Mound 5341Maywood Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mr. Levens: With regard to various questions which arose at Mound's 15 December 1977 Community Development Block Grant Public Hearing, further research pro- vides somewhat different, and even more complicated explanations than were given at that time. Although HUD staff will not provide an official determination regarding individual projects until their actual review of the Urban County application, the following information is based upon their tentative determinations to date. Day Care/Financial Assistance: The proposed regulations (25 October 1977) do'provide for the funding of.public service projects (i.e. child care) if that service meets a number of special criteria. These criteria are found in 570.201 (e) (1-5), which was contained in yoUr handout material. In summary such services can only be provided to residents of a designated "comprehen- sive neighborhood revitalization area" - a designated geographical area meeting the 51% rule (see 570.301(a)) - in which other block grant assisted physical development activities are being carried out in a concentrated manner. Such services can be assisted only in those ' instances where "two-thirds of those persons receiving the public service are residents of the comprehensive neighborhood revitalization area." The service in question must be either a (i) new service, or (ii) a quantifiable increase in the level of a service. Also, federal assis- tance in providing or securing such public service (from some other federal program source) must have been applied for and denied or not made available (see 570.607). And finally, the public service must be determined by the applicant "to be necessary or appropriate.to support the physical development activities to be carried out within comprehen- sive neighborhood revitalization areas." It is readily apparent that meeting this combination of criteria, although not necessarily impossible, would be extremely difficult. It should be noted incidently that other local Community Development appli- cants who have included such a project in their Year IV Program were able to do so under the prior, and less restrictive, regulations. Des- pite these complications, Urban County staff would be most willing to offer any assistance we can should the City wish to pursue this project. Hennepin County is an Affirmative Action Employer Mr. Donald Levens '16 D~cember 1977 Page Two w 75%/25% Rule: As indiCated, planning, handicapped access and housing rehabilita- tion (by virtue of. income eligibility) projects are automatically exempt from the 51% rule. Other projects must be located in a geographic area where 51% or more of all household incomes are below $15,520, with'the exception of certain projects for which the project cost does not exceed 25% of the total grant amount. Please refer to 570.302(c)(1-5) of the proposed regulations. You should note that these project exceptions are quite limited and do not automatically allow park projects, etc. as may have been interpreted from my comments. Note specifically that the costs of administration and planning may be excluded from the computation of the amount of funds which benefit low and moderate-income persons (the base amount in determining the 75%/25% split). Bike/hike paths: f HUD staff has indicated that transportation projects will be eligible if, and only, it can be assured that principally benefiting users will be low and moderate income. It would be possible, for example, to improve a deadend road in a 51% area, but not a major arterial going through such an area. It would appear that justifying a bike/ hike path may prove very difficult pursuant to the above criteria. As is becoming obvious the proposed regulations severely restrict the programming options available to any community. It is recommended that you give early attention to demographic research so as to determine whether and which areas within the City qualify under the 51% rule. If you require further clarification of these regulations or other assistance please feel free to contact me (348-7473.), Larry Blackstad (3~8-5859) or Hendrickson (348-7695). cc: Patricia Maltz Management Services ' 2309 Governmen Minneapolis, MN 55487 HONNePIN COUNTY 6 December 1977 Mr. Don Levens City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Proposed Year 4/FYi9 - Community Development Regulations Dear Don: As presently proposed, the CD Regulations require that 75% of the grant amount must be used to benefit neighborhoods service areas in which at least 51% of population resides in households with a gross income of less than $15,520. Related to housing rehabilitation ac- tivities this requirement is being interpreted to mean that only these households incomes of less than $15,520 are eligible to receive as- sistance. The regulations do not prescribe any specific percentage of the grant amount which must expend on rehabilitation or other housing related activities. If there are any additional questions please contact me at 348-5859. /// /~L.arr~ B1 ackstad vc_~nner Hennepin County is an Affirmative Action Employer ON LAKE IvlINNIETONKA INDIAN BURIAL MOUNDg 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA55364 December 29, 1977 (6z2) 472-~ss TO: Leonard L. Kopp, City Man~ge~ FROM: Don Levens, City Planner ~,;;-'~'--J SUBJECT: Financial Status - Community Development Program Years I, II and III Year Total Budget Balance Year I Doon Park $16,302.00 $808.00 Bikeway/Walkway System $8,099.00 $198.00 Planning & Management $1,750.00 none Year II Island Park $41,769.00 $12,796.00 Bikeway/Walkway System * · Transferred to Rehabilitation Grant Program $12,000.00 Year II I Island Park $17,000.00 Three Points Park $32,000.00 Bikeway/Walkway System $13,300.00 $12,000.00 $17,000.OO $32,000.00 $13,300.00 ON LAKE MINNEL'TONKA INDIAN BURIA1 MOUNDlll 534]. MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (6].2) 472-1't55 January 5, 1978 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Park Commission The City Manager HUD Funds In your determination in recommending the spending of Year IV HUD Funds, the following is for your consideration: Fund left from prior years: For Island Park - Park Year II Year III $12,796.00 17,000.00 $29,796.00 For Three Points Park Year II Year III None $32,000.00 Attached are copies of letters from the Public Works Director estimating that there remains $26,000 in work on Island Park Park and $20,000 on Three Points Park. Also attached from the Public Works Director is a letter regarding the buildings in the Three Points Park. ..... 3WL.~bnard L. Ko~p??- ON LAKE MINNETONKA INDIAN BURIAL MOUNDS 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 Becember 27, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Kopp Public Works Director Parks Cost Estimate As requested the following are estimated costs for the completion of Three Points Park, less storm system, and Island Park Rec. area. I. P. Rec. Area This Park still needs fill, grading, sod, seed, basketball m~t, R & R equipment, perimeter Dost and mica. work, the estimated cost for labor and materials is, $96,000.00 Three Points Park This park also needs fill, grading, sod, seed, R & R equipment, some perimeter posts and misc. work, the estimated cost for labor and materials is, $20,000.00. R~spectfully, Public Works Director RAM/jcn 175 ON LAKE MINNE~I'ONKA INDIAN BURIAL. MOUND''~ 534~ MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 January 5, 1978 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Kopp Public Works Director Three Points Park The proposed upgrading plan for Three Points Park calls for filling the surface area to approximately three feet. This will remove the feSlin§ that the play area is a hole in the ground and also increase the flat area of the park ten to fifteen percent. This will also put the raised tennis court to the approximate level as the total area that is presently used for recreation. The request at this time is to ask for input from Council and Park Co~mission as to the removal of the concrete block building oh'.the north end of the park. This buildin9 will have to be removed in order to fill the Park as proposed. The Public Works Department. has no use for this building~ at one time it was suggested it be used as a warmin9 house for winter recreation activities. There is a wooden building located in the park that can be used for the same purpose as the block buildin§~ should permission be 9ranted to remove the block building. The block buildins has not been used for some years and does not have any utilities to it. Respectfully, 'n'Jb er t 'fli net --' Public Works Director FOR CO['~IUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS PURPOSE To provide financial assistance to those Iow income families needing child care while the parents are at work or in training. This program assists parents in achieving self-support in a positive way byhelping with child care costs. A greater share of the child care costs are paid when the family's income is lower and that share decreases as income increases: II. ELIGIBILITY III. IV. V. VI. VII. A. Resident of City of Mound. B. Working atleast 35 hours per week or attending schoolfull time. C. Income requirements minimum of 60 % of Minnesota's.medium income and the maximum of 90% ofMgnnesota's medium income. D. Utilize a licensed day care program for child care. NLP;£ER OF CHILDREN TO BE SERVED 18 minimum - 31 mmximmm AMOUh~ OF REQUEST $20,000.00 AMOUNT OF MO~SY GEBrERATED $14,720.00 INCOME REQUIP~ENTS · Family of ~o Family of Three Fa~mily of Four Family of Five Family of Six Family of Seven Family of Eight Family of Nine $6,763 - 11,272 8,503 - 1~,172 10,123 - 15,184 11,742 - 19,570 13,362 - 22,270 13,666 - 22,777 13,696 - 22,827 14,273 - 23,788 ~MOUNT OF SIIBSIDY When the family is above 60% but at or below 70 % of the State's medium income the parents pay 25% of the child~ care and the program subsidizes 75% of the cost. ~',hen the fanily is between 71% and 80% of the State's medium income the parents pay 50 % and the program subsidizes 50% of the cost. When the family is between 81% and 90% of the State's medimm income the parents pay 75% of the child care costs and the program subsidizes 25% of the cost. 173 Page 2 Requsst Of the $20,000 requested, the first $12,000 is to be used in the 60 - 70% catagory, the next $6000 is to be allocated to the 70-80% catagory and the remaining 42000 is allocated to 'the 80-90% catagory. VIII. AVERAGE CHILD CARE COSTS Family Day Care $6.50 per child per day Cares for children 6 weeks to 12 years in the providers own home. Maximum nmmber of children is either 5 or lC. Mound has 9 licensed providers. Group Day Care $7.30 per child per day Group setting for 2-~-to 6 yr olds. Local source is Shoreline Child Development Center. $1638 per yr. $1840 per yr. School Age Day Care $3.50 per child per school day 6.00 per child per full day Group setting for children ages 6 to 12 years. Local source is Westonka School Age Day Care Program. $1082 per yr IX. ADMINISTRATION a. Done by the City - Programs refer client for enrollment in the program. b. Verification of income by check stubb. Verification of training by letter from school. c. Parents pay their portion directly to provider. City pays their portion following monthly.billing. Patricia ~ltz Executive Director Quality Child Care, Inc. 6037 Hawthorne Road Mound MN 55364 472-1997 ~';~ 570., ~ Objective ~ci ptwpo,le o~ pr~ram, Subpmrt J--Gr~nt Administration · "~ 570.3 Dc/lnltlov-~, 570.500 Dc~lg"-~tlor, o~ public agency, prevention or STO.% %VaAver~. . $70.501 Gr~n= 570.J~ ~cne~[. b~O.~ ~trlcCto~s O~ fund com~t~en[ 570.101 ~oc~tto~ Be~een ~e~opo~ and ~d ~o~e~opoE~ ~e~. 570.505 ~c~ m~n~eme~t 570.102 B~tc ~: ~mo~ 570.5~ ~o~ ~. 570.103 Ilold-h~e~ gr~. 570.~7 ~emen: st~d~ds. 570.1~ ~ for d~cr~tion~ g~. 570.50~ ~n~g ~d 530.105 q~tion ~ ~ban co~ty. 570.5~ Au~. 3~0.I06 Qu~cattou & ~b~tou date~. 5~0.510 ~ntion of r~or~, 570.107 Re~llo~tlon of f~. 570.511 ~ a~inM~attv~ se~lc~ for 570.108 O~3e: ~ entlMem~t, h~ll~ttou loans and 5~3.~00 570.203 570.304 570.305 Oeue rs~t policies. I~aalc eligible act;vittel. EUgtblo reh~bLLit~tlcu~ aJ3d pr~- e~Mou ~tivitt~. ~gtble ~o~a d~velop~e~ ~- ~t~ble ~ttvttt~ by priva~ non- p~ entities, loc~[ development co~tto~, or small bus~ ~ ~ne~t to low~ and moder- Co~=y ~velopme~ 570~06 570.3eL 570.302 5%'0.305 5~0.306 570,402 570.40 8 570.407 ~i70.5L3 Db~-o~lonary ~re.~C clo~out~. Subped K~her ~&ram ~equlmmen~ 570.600 Ll~l~tto~ on lo~l option activ- i~ ~d contingency acc~. 570.601 Non~lna~iou. 570.~ ~l~[iou ~ acqu~itlon. 570.603 570.t~ ~c pm~tiou. 570.605 ~or 570.606 ~chitec~ Ba~iers Act of 1968. 570.6~ A~ties for w~ch other Federal Juu~ mu9: be sough~. 5~.608 Ha~h A~. 570.609 NaU~I ~ood ~an~ ~o~. 530.610, Clan A~ A~ ~d Federal ~ter bllu~lou Cou~l A~. ~70.612 ~d-B~ed . lion Act. 570.612 Activities couduc~ed by ~ti~l~, ~BZC'~, and lo~ develop- ment c0~o~Clo~ 570.6i3 D~}5on 9uhpad L~Rese~zd] Cc:r~d3c;~t-to~. 670.700 Eligible applicants. '~.min~r of ~pplic~tion ~,lhmt_~ion. , 5';0.70L Appllmm~on requirements. 570.702 Gusto, arced loa~ amount. Ur~enl; nee~'-~ fund.~ Oener~l purpo6e funds for m'etro- poHtan and monme~'roplitan are~, lqe-w com.n~-unlt le-J. Aremw~do program.~ Oun.,,'.'.'.'.'.'.'.~ tho VLrEL~ ]L~lo. nd~. can ~o~, ~ the Tru~ Tm'ri- tory of t~e ~n=o~ttTe pro~ec~. F~er~ly recked Strbpart F--Sm~ll Clt/~-s'Program $obp*~ ~an Develops*at Action Gran~ 570.452. ~i~le appll~n~. 5~.4~ Eligible ac~t~tles. 570.4 ~ Applicator. 5~0.455 ~erl~ for 570.%56 ~D r~le~ ~ ~on on ~ppH- ~tto~q. 5~AaT Post-apptov~ requMcmen~ 5?0Aai ~m amendment. 5~0.~0 Allocation to no~metr~olit~ cities. 570.5~ Ap~l~b~lty tio~ 570.703 Federal ~uarautee. 570/;04 ]~I~rketing of no~s and 570.~5 ~n~ for ~ablo oblf~flo~ 570~ Genii. 8~0.~5 ~po~ to be eu~itted by clpleuts. 570.906 A~u~ p~nc~ ~po~. fecund. 570.911 ~eduction of an~ 570.9~ Nond~cr~ation ~mpliance. 570~1~ Other rem~tes f~ noncompliance. ~. Subpa~s C; EB~ible Actl~ttes. and ~d ~ renews: Subpa~ C--Eligible A~ivit~es · ~ 570.2~ Genial poll,s. subpa~ se~ fo~h ~e va~c~ Of eH~ble ~Ses that may ~ ~d~n wl~h blight. The enumeration of cert,3.in eligi- ble types of :~ckl',-it,,ies in thL~ s-u~pa~rt does not by lt. salf, however, rcnde~ s~e- cL~c activities, proposed to be conducted by tndividun/ applica_~ta, eil~ible for assistance under th~ Part. There are other requirements that mtmt ~Iso be me[ to quMifb, :~ specific o~tlv/ty for siatazme. An ,%ctlvity may be assisted only in those lnstxnc~ where t~ corn- pres with M1 other applicable requL-e- meats of this Part0 and the basic statu- tory objective5 of the block gr~,n~ pro- gms. In 9arttcular, activities conducted by entitlement recipient,% mua~; comply with the requirements set forth in .~ 5"/0.302 reg~xdtng behest, to low- and moderate-income persor~ or elimination 0f slums and blight, and dl~cretlonary recipients must comply with sim, ilar re- quirements set forth in Suhpar~ F. Fur- [her. there musg be compliance with all applicable environment3-1 review and clearance procedures se~ forth in 21 CF~ Part 58. (b) Urban Development actiom grants. Grant ac-alstance may be provided with Urban Development Action Grants pure suan~ to Subpart G for: (1) Activities elig4ble for as.~tance pursuant to th~ Subpa~c; end (2) Such other activites va the Sec- retary may determine to be consia:en~ x~-ith the statutory objectives of the Urban Devclopmenl; Action Grant pro- grb, m ms provided lot tn § 5'/0.453. In ma-ling determinations of ellgibfl- ~ with regard to Urban Development Action Grant, a, for the purpost~ o! t.~ 570.201-206, the term "Commtmit7 Developmen~ Program" aa used in this subpa,rt shall ~lso mean the "Urb.~n velopment Action Program." · strmdin~ ~m~-~daing to the contrary tn this suhpart, ~y ongoing model cities activ- ity bein~ cv_z~ied out in ~ model cities program shah be eHg~bIe for trading un- der this P~.rt from that. por~lon of the hold-harrnle~ amoun~ ~t~--lbutable to such model citte~ prog-~m tmtil the pIicant has received five years of lund!n~ for such activitkm as calculated to ~ 570=103(c) (2) (ill). For ~he pur-J~o~e of thi~ pv. ragraph, the term "ongoiri~ activity" meam,~ any model ~ties activily underway as of January I, 19'/5, that was approved and funded by ~ on or lore June 30, 19'/4. (d) Fcciltiies containing both eli~ibl¢ anti ine!iqibte.~se~. %Vhere a facility, oth- e~'wise eli~ble for assistance under the block grant program is lo be provided as a part of a multiple-use building ,and/or facLIlty tha~ also contains otherwise in- ei/gible uses, the portion of the costs tributed to the-eli~ble facility may be ~sL~ted .~tth block grant funds where: (1) The f~cflIty, which is el/~ble and proposed for a.~s/st,-m, ce. occupy a dcslg-nated and dL~c,'-ete are., wtthtn the larger facili,~-.: and FEDERAL REGI<;II~, VOL 42, NO. 20S--TUESDAY, OCIOBE]~ :25, 1977 . applicant can determine the 2~nCe ~ separ~ ~nd ':~ / bUYeR ~d/or . /or example. ~ senior center, which ~ oc~p~ ~pgce w~ ~ b~d~g ~t 0~e~O ~ for tho conduct of when ~ excl~lvely occupi~ ~ (Lc., ~e se~or cen~r does not to dlUerent locatio~ wI~in the bufld~w ~at happen ~ be available on a less De~ent b~M) and the ~ppHcant dete~ the c~t ~sociated with pro- vl~ ~e ~e~or center ~ d~t~ct from ~ose cos~ ~octated wt~ ~R rem~g ~eHgible portlo~ of ~e bufld~g. (e) Acli~!ies out~ige an a~licanUs bo~ndafle~. ADPHc~ may conduc~ ~ctivI[l~ w~ are o~e~he eligible for block g~nt ~s~tance ou~ide of bo~d~ries which ~e no~ platy prop~ ~ mee~ identical needs of ~ppHc~t. For example, ~ ~b~ co~t7 m~ conduc~ necessaxy'acti~ties which z~ o~e~a eli~bIe bIock ~an~ ~ wl~ a me~opolit~ city which are not pl~gy m~pproprla~ to mcet~ ldent~ n~ of ~e appllc~nt. ~ 570.201 B~ic eligible Gr~ ~ce m~y he used for (~). Acqu~on. Acqubitiom ~ whole or In p~ b7 a public agency, by ~e. le~e. donation or othe~be. rem p~e~7 (~clud~g a~ ~gh~. wm~r ~gh~ ~d obher ~r~ there,) ~g. ~develop~ or lnappro~fla~el7 ~lope~ from ~e st~dpoint of co~ developmen~ and ~ow~. de~ by tho reclDien~ p~su~ 8~te ~ 1~1 laws; (2) App~p~te for reh~t~on or co~e~a~lon ac~es: · (3) Approp~a~ for ~e pr~e~a~lon or sea.ration of histori~ st~s, beaut~caUon el urban l~nd. the ~tlon of open spaces, na~ resources ~nd sclc ~re~. the p~Wmfon of of ~b~ development: (4) To ~ ~ed for the p~vtsfo~ of public wor~, facflit~ and imp~vemen~ e~Ible for ~ce ~dcr ~ sub- p~; or (5) To~ used for o~er pubic p~es. lnclu~ ~e conve~ion of land to other use~ whe~ n~e~a~ or appro- P~a~ ~ the comm~l~ development p~. For example, a central cl~ of ~ metropolitan srea may ~e bl~k ~t. f~ ~ p~h~e houses ~ s non-~- pac~ ~ab~b~ Ju~ction ~ order provide a ~der choice of ho~l~ ~lti~ for cent~ city lower-income s~e, le~e, donation, or othe~e. any r~ p~pe~y ~q~ed wi~ block ~nt f~ or t~ retention for p~llc p~. pro~ded that ~e f~m ~ ~u~ dbposltlon ~a[l b~ p~ ~ ~come ~ubJcct to the requ5emen~ forth tn ,~ 570.505. Further lnfornm- regarding disposition is set forth 570.613. (C) Public /aciliile~ anc~ Improve- mentS. Acquisition. construction, recon- struction, rehabilitation or installation (hicludtng the execution of architecture! desfgn features and similar treatment~ L~,tendt~i to erd~ance the esthetic quality -of facilities and improvements eligible for assistance render this Part such as decorative pavements, railings, sculp- ture, pools or water and fountains, and other works of axt) of only the fo[lowing public facilities and improvements: (1) Senior center~, but excluding any facility whose primary function la to provide residential accommodations or ca~e on a 24-hem' day basis (such ~ a group home). (2) Parks. pIaylrrattndz and other re- * creattor~l ]actlftiez which are designed for participation, but not spectator fa- cilities such as stadhun.~. (3) Centers /or the handicapped. The term "center for the handicapped" means any single or multipur~ose' facility which seeks to ~s.s/st per~ons with physi- cal. mental, developmental and/or emo- tional impalrment~ to become more functional member~ of the community by providing programs or services which may Include. but are no~ 1Lin/ted to, recreation, education, health care, social development, independent living, physi- cal rehabilitation and voca~onal reha- bilitation; but excluding any whose primary lunction is to provide residential care on a 24-hour a d~y basis (such as a group home or halfway house). For-example, a sheltered work- . shop woulffbe a single purpose center for the handicapped, and a lacillty providing several servtccz for the handicapped would be a multipurpose center for. the handicapped, both of which are ellg/ble for a.~t~tance. i4) 'NeighborhOOd /acililies. ~ Such · facilities ,may be of either a single pur- pose or muir/purpose n~tu~e and axe designed to provide health, social, recre- ationed or simffv, r community services. primarily /or residents of the neighbor- hood service area, i.e., at least fifty-one (51 perce~t) percent of those persons ceiving or planned to receive services Irom the factli~ shall be r~ldents of the service area. For the purpose of thin p~ragr~r~, tho term "~er~'ice area" means either: (1) A geographic location within the Jur/sdlctton o! a unit of general local government (but not the entire Jurhdic- tion) designated ~n comprehensive ordlnance~ or other Ioc~l documents ~s neighborhood and described in the Com- munity Development Program as a com- prehensive neighborhood revitallz~tion area as defined in § 570.301¢a) or ser~qce area. or, in a new community as defined in § 570.403(a), a neighborhood,' village or sim/lz.r geographical desig~nation: or (11) An entl~e unit of general local government or new commurdty as de- fined in § 570.403(a) which is under 10.000 population, with the exception that a f~cillty which is designed solely a~ a community,ride facility in a new community with a currently projected scion in cxcea~ of 10.000. may not b~ as a neighborhood f~cfllty. Solid ~aste di~posa~ /aciHtie$o wtfich are defin~ ~ tho~e physical pa~ of solid w~te management systems com- menced at and ~clu~ng ~e ~i~ or at which Dublicl~ or privately o~mcd col- lection ve~cl~ ~charge municipal w~. th~u~ the ~t oi ~posal lnclu~g uecessa~ site ~- provemen~ and conve~g sFate~, clung appropriate fixed and movable eq~ment ~clu~ng vehic~ar contaC- ers ~ed afar ~e flint stage of at tramfev station. Such facilities or eq~ment m~t be located in or comprehe~ive neighborhood tion arpas. Eq~pment and ap~u~e- nauc~ ~ ~ the l~flal collection ~oHd w~s are not included among ~ose solid w~te dhpos~ f~[Htle~ e~gl- ble for assStance ~der ~s (6) Fire protection/acililies and equip- ment. Such f~ities and eq~pment m~t be located ~ or se~e comprehen- sive nelghborh~ re. Celestion are~. ii) ~re p~tectton facilities are de- fined ~ the land and n~ess~ ~prave- men~ ~ereto WMch are uece~a~ for properly ho~g and s~ng fire protec- .tion equipment and perso~el by a fire p/erection o~atlon, but not ~clud- lng ~e righted schoo~ and ~eM tennnces. (ti) ~re proration eq~pmen~ ~ ~ed ~the appropr~ eq~pment and appa~t~ which a fire Dro~c~on orga- ~ation r~res for ca~iylng out a ~ro- ~m for protected prape~ and ta~ng the safe~ and wegare of ~e public, inclu~g emergency m~c~ ~ from the dangem of ~e. (~) Paring /acilitiex. Such ~acflitfes mint ~ l~d in or se~e compreh~- sloe neighborh~ re~Matlon ~. (8) Public utilities, oth~ t~ water ~d sewer, w~ch ~d~e: (D ~1~ n~sa~ for d~t~butlon of the u~H~F, (but not pr~uctioa or gen- eration. ~uck ~ el~icM gene~tion plan~); '(ii) B~ld~gs ~d ~provement~ that ~re ~n ~ p~ oi the utffi~y are of such ~ na~ that the ut~ ~ not i~ctlen ~out ~em: (~) ~e pl~g ~de~omud oi ~t~g or new dht~butlon (9) Stre~ im~e~t~. s~t light, ~a~c si~, st~% s~eet ways and other no~ app~ten~ces p~age on, or ~ge of, s~M.. but clud~g exD~ways and o~ ~ ways ~d ~eir app~nanc~. (10) Wat~ and s~ /a~li2ies, ~- clud~g s~ sewe~, except for sewage tr~tment wor~ a~d ~te~ep~or sewer~ w~ch are d~crl~ ~ ~ ] ~ewe~ or other cond~, ope~ oc cl~ed, or the~ ~pp~n~c~ w~ch t~port and ~e of s~ s~e water, s~r~ w~ o~her grid ~d wa~r or ~a~ge ~ e~g wa~r co~, exclud~,g domes- tic was~ wa~r and ind~t~l ~"EDERA{. REG1ST[~, VOL. 42, INO. 20S--TUESDAY, OCTOBE~ 25, 1977 (11) Foundations azu~ ]or a~r rights sites. ¢12) Pedestrian malls and walk,rays, (13) Floog and dratnaqe /acilittcs, in c~es where ~s~tance for such facilities h~ ~n dcte~n~ to ~ ~ava~able ~der other ~ederM laws or pro~a~ means those ~dertak~gs d~i~ed ~fluence or affect ~e flow ~ a n~ax~l w'a~r co~e (such ~ ~ r~ec. stream. l~c, ~tu~, bay, oce~ or ~temtttent ~trem) ~d excludeu (d) Clearance acti~te~. Clemnce, demolition and ~moval ol b~d~gs ~d ~pmvem~. ~du~g movcmen~ ~t~act~ to other ~lt~. ~ollUon of ~ ~ed ho~g ~ may o~y ~de~aken pu~uant to a p~n approved b7 ~. (e) Public se~[ce~. ~ov~lon of public ~e~l~ (Inc~dlng la~r. suppll~ ~d ma~rla~) which g~ directed ~wa~ imping the co~i~'s public lc~ ~d f~i~tie~, lnclud~g th~e con- ce~ wl~h emplo~ent, cr~e preven- tion, c~ld c~e. h~l~, ~g gbme, cation, we~e or recr~tlo~l n~. ~d which ~ direct~ ~w~ ~ord~t~g public ~d p~vx~ development pro- ~ms. Such re.ices may be provided bF S~ or l~ govemen~, quit-' public, p~va~ or nonD~flt ~encle~ lect~ bF ~e aDpl~ant for f~d~ pro- ~ded ~der ~ ~rt. ~blic ~e~lcea m~t meet the foHow~g crlte~a: (1) ~bHc ~e~cea m~g ~ provld~ for ~iden~ of comprehe~lve nelgh~r- h~ revi~on or s~ar. are~ w~ch block ~nt ~ p~sic~ ve~pment ~tl~ti~ ~ ~g ~ed out In a concen~d m~er. Such pub- ]lc se~c~ m~ bo ~ppo~ with b!~k ~t f~ for no more ~ tt~ee y~ M~ the com~le~ion ot such p~c~ de- velopment actt~. ~r ~e put.se of (1) Physt~ development ~viti~ in- clude o~y ~e d~crib~ in ~ (a) ~h (d), (f) ~ough (h), ~d (k), ~d ~ 570.202 ~h~ugh } 570.203. (H) ~e p~e "concen~t~ m~n- nor" s~ m~n that the bl~k ~ant ~- ~ physlc~ dev~opment activi~es ~e ~ ~ out In a coord~a~d m~- nor ~ se~e g common objective or ~se p~mut ~ ~ l~aHy develo~d Dian or ~tra~ ~ ~ comDrehe~lve neigh- bochood revi~l~tloa ~e~. (2) Such s~c~ m~ut be d~t~ ~- ~d mee~g the ne~s of ~siden~ ~uch gcc. Bl~k ~nt ~s~nce may ~ pro~ded for ~ch se~s o~ ~ose ~nc~ where ~-~da of tho~ ~o~ r~elving ~e pubic sedco a~ r~iden~ of the comprehe~lve neigh- borhood revl~l~atlon area. (~) A public se~ce m~t be either a new so.ice, or (Ii) g qu~t~xble ~- c~e ~ ~e lev~ of a so.ice a~ve which h~ b~n provided from local or Sta~ so=ces tn ~e twelve calendgr mon~ prior ~ submission o~ the bilk ~t ~ppllcat[on. lan ~xception t~ r~u~ement %qth ~a~ ~ f~d~ re~c~ my be m~e If H~ ~m~ea that ~e decree ~ ~e ~evel PROPOSED RULES a service was the result of events wlthin the control of the applicant. (4) F~ieral ,q.~Lstance in providing or securing such public services mint have been applied Ior .~md de~ied or no£ m~le ~.vailable pursuax~t, to the provisions of § 570.$0~. (5) Public ~crvices must be deter- mined by' the applicon, hr to be nece~nxy or ,~pproDri~.te to support the physical development ~tivitic~ to be cayricd out within comprehe~ive neilghborhood vit.'xl.~aUo~ axc-~. ~7he speci~l¢ det. crmi- nation 0£ ~ul~port for each proposed ~ub- tic service is not rcquixcd to be included in the application, but the -~pplicant rnu~t briefly describe tAxo relationship of thc public service to the physical devel- opment activitAes. I~2UD will accept the applic~t's detc.~min~tion t~aat a public r, ervlce is nccc~ary and appropriate to support the physical development tivities un. less there is substantial evi- dence to the contrax~y, in which c~e vAditional information or a~surances may be requested from the applicvmt prior to a detcrrainatlon of eligibility. (f) I~terim assistance. Interim sistxuce to alleviate h~ul conditiorm whcxe L'n.m~l~ pubU¢ actAon is deter- m~ed by the ~ppIlcant to be necessaxy, including: (1) The repalxlng o~ street, side- wa]F~s, p~rk~, playgrounds, publicly owned utLlltie~ v~nd public factJities; (2) The improvement' of private properties to the extent necc~sz, ry to elimL~xte immediate da~ger~ to pubItc hea.lth, s~Jety ov wel/axe; (3) The estab]Ashment of t~mporary public playground~ on vacant lax~d; and (4) The execution o~ non-routine ge_r- b.~.ge, trash o. nd debrks removal, stxeet cle~g, snow removz~t ~d strnil:~.x' tlvit!eS. '(g) Payment o! the noa-Fed~ra! share rcqukred in con_nccUon wlt. h a Fed~pA gran~-ln-0Ad, prcygrm u~dert~ken pgr~ of .the block gr~.n~ ~ctivlties. Pro-- vialed, That such p~yment shv. ll be lira.i- ted tc~ activities o~erw ¢12e eligible under this subp~xt. (h) Urbau renewal co~npletfon. Pay- mcng of the coat of completing an urb~-x renewal project funded under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949 a~ amended. Y~xrther information regarding the eli- gibLl_Ity of such Costa ta se~ forth, ha § 5~0.801. (i) .~elocattom Relocation paymenLs. and e~sLstance for individuals, families. busine.~ses, nonprofit organizations, and farm oper~tion3 dL~laced by* activities e~s~ted trader thi.x P,qxt. Further infer- marion regard/ut the eligibility of re- Ioc~io~ cosf5 is set forth in § 5'/0.002. (J) Loss o] rental income. Payments to housing owners for losses of rental in- come incurred in holding for tempor.~x3' periods housing units to be utilized for the relocation of indlvidu.~As and families displaced by program acttvitie': a~sL~ted under this Part. (k) Removal o! architectural barriec$. Special pro. ets direct, ed to ~he removal of material ~a~d architectural ba~rler~ In publicly owned and privately buildings, fact/i~ter and improvements which restrtc~ the mobility and ~cce~t- blllty of elderly or hlxndlc.~pped per, om. §570,20Z Eli~hl¢ rehah~itation and prcse~atioa acl~vlti~. Oran~ assis~nce may ~ ~ed for foBowing ~ctigities for t~ rehabilitxtlon of b~d~gs and ~provemen~: tn) Rek~illtatiog ol public res~ential structures. RehabLllt~tIon of DubIlcly o~med or acqu~ properties for use ~e~e ~ the prov~ion of ho~g. (b) Public ho~inq moderinzation. Modern~atlon and modem~ation plan- lng (exclud~g, ~e new const~ctlon of o~ce I~gles ~or such pubUc hom~g) IN,B. Block ~t IuBds m~F also be pro- vided by aa applicant to a pubt!e hou~tng ~ouc7 ~ bo us~ for ot~e~ls~ eUglb~e tlr[ties, e.g., p~bllc ~1c~ such ~c~t7 day c~o meeting the requik~meats o[ ! ~0~(e) and plannit and ma~gemeat activities under t 570.R~ lat~ ~ public hoeing ~provemen~.) (C) Rehabilitatio~ by nonpro~t enti- ties. Acq~sigion ~d rehabi~tation prop~ti~ by p~vate nonp:ofit entities for use or res~e ~ ~e prO.ion ho~lng: (d) ~ehabilitatlon material. sion of bu~g ma~ria~, ~clud~g pa~ ~ be ~d by homeo~era or ten~ ~or rehab~tion o~ pro~rtt~. (e) Rehabilitation ~nanciny. ~e fl- nanc~g of rehab~tatlon of priva~ o~ r~idenUM, non-residen;~. ~4 ~-~e properties ~rough the ~e of bl~k ~ f~ ~ the'pro~- sion of ~ce. suc~ ~ ~n~. l~ns. loan ~a and ~rest supple- men~, for: (1) C~ of rehabi~tion of ~, ~c~u~g, rep~ dkec~ towed ct~ of ~ ~m~atioa of I~ deleted m~n~ce, repl~emen; pr~ctp~ ~xt~s ~d componenLn e~t~g s~c~es, ~d ~no,~.t~on ~ough ~r~ion. ~tio~ ~, or h~cement of ex~t~g s~c~, w~ch may ~ ~der~k~ s~gly, or ~ combi- nation; (2) Re~c~g ex~t~g ~deb~dnes~ s~ by a prop~ty berg rehab~ted g such r~c~g ~ nece~ or ap- p~a~ ~ the ex~uttoa o~ a Co~u- ~y Developm~t ~3) M~ ~ ~cr~ the e~cient ~ough such m~ ~ ~afloa of s~rm windows .~d doors, sing, w~ · -~d at~ic im~a~on, ~d conversion,. m~cagion or repl~ement of hegt~g equipment; or (4) ~c~g of c~ ~s~ta~ with ~e colorlon of residenU~ ~c~ ~ wa~c ~s~bution ~ or !~al ~wer collation l~es. but not pa~cnt of ~- a~men~ which ~e ~e~ble ~ ~ 570.208(h). (f) C~e enlorccment. C~e e~orce- ment ~ d~l~a~ comprehe~ive neighborh~d re~ation are~ w~ch such e~orcement, ~ether with public ~pcovemen~ ~d ~c~ ~ be provide, may be ex~t~ ~ ~est ~e d~qe of the (g) H~o~c prcse~ation. tion, pr~ervation, res~ra~lon ~d ~- FEDERAL REGIST£~, VOL. 4'2, ['lO. '20S--TUESDAY, OCTOaE~ 25, 1977 J_ 6"5 ' .an of-historic properties, ~ rely and pr~vabely owned, which ~ ,~se si~.~ or st~ct~ ~at ~e eider h'atmnM ~g~ter pt ~dc PI~e~. l~d ~ g State ~ven~ of Pl~es, or desi~a~ ~ a State or land m~N or h~rlc d~lct by appro- p~a~ law or ord~c~ ~bUcly o~ed histo~c prope~t~ may bo ~ted. ~clu~g those prop~tlca whlch ace o~e~Ne ~eNglble for ante ~der thN ~bpart. gowever, eIl- glbtllW In limited o~ to tho~ cos~ essaW for rehabilitation, presc~oa r~=~tl0n of ~e prope~ and not for conve~lon or e~anston of ~e pro.sty for ~ ~ell~ble ~. For exmple, clty museum se~ng Iow- gad moderate- income p~on~ ~d INtcd ~ ~o Nation- ~ p~g~t~ may be r~tor~, but the dlNo~ of a ~ew w~g on ~o m~ co~d not ~aHy he ~ts~d, ~le~ were o~e~ eligible, for pmuant to ~ 570.203(b). } S70203 Eligible ~onoml¢ develo~ Gr~t ~tanee may be pro~dcd for tho follow~g deveIopment actlvlH~ which,arc.retted toward the aHe~la~on of p~gc~ and economic dN~¢~, or ~onomtc development of a new com- m~W ~ d~cNbed ~ ~ 570.403(a) ~ou~ st~utation or pNvate West- menk eo~u~ revita~zaNon, ex~a~ton or economic oppo~ltie~ for low- and modemte-~come person, ¢lud~g: ca) Aequ~ffio~. Acqu~ltlon of r~ prope~ Ior economl¢ development {bi P~Hc laciHttes. Ac~Ni~om con- or ~t~a~a of pubic f~ittes not ~ eligible for ~N~ce ~d~ ] 5~0.201~c1, which are detem~ed by ~ ~ppN~t. to he necessaW ~d appro- pNa~e to ~plemen5 ~e applicant's ~etghborhood re~tal~a~fon or econo~. ~velo~t ztrate~: (1) ~ des~tbed la ~ 570.304~b~ ' entitlme=t appllcanN; or ~2~ For ~l o~er appllc~, ~ fo~h ~ the applkation ~ o~e~¢ qu~d by ~ P~ For ~ample, ~ an area ~th a~ plos~e~t ~t¢ I~ cxc~ of the rate, a ma~w~ ~al~lng c~ter which 1~ d~l~¢d to p~pare loc the work force lo~ ~d m~te-~rae remons who ~e unemployed or underempl~d', may be a~N~d where it ~ detained by appllcan~ that ~ch a facfli~ Is nec~saW and approp~ate to suppo~ i~ ec~omt¢ de~lopment st~te~. ~ ap~llcaa~ shall provide ~ ~th a descNptlon of the prop~ed facility, and of the ~lation- shlp of the facility to the applicant's ~rate~ for nefgh~rhood ~vltal~att~ or economic development. ¢c} C~m~aI and ind~rsf~at ff~. AequNl~on, const~ctton, r~- st~c~lo~, rehabilitation or ~1} Commercial or Ind~tNal and ~ct~; ~clud~g PROPOSED RULES (l) Purcha. se of equipment and fixOded by an turc.'; which are part of thc real e~ta~, but not peraonal property; and (il) Energy con$crvatioa improvc- mcn~ desired ~ encourage the e~cienb use of energy rcsouzccs, (lnclud~g re- newable energy r~ot~c~ or ~l~a~ve ener~ respect); (2) Con~crciM or ~d~t~al rem proper~y ~provemen~. (including raH- applican[ ~o be used b~' pri- vate nonprofit, entities. SBIC's. or local d~vel00mcng c0~or?.~i0ra ' - ~o. activities which .%re not othe~e eligible for s~tance ~der thB subpart ~d which ~e de~e~ed by the applicant to be necessa~ or appropriate ~o thc accon~- p~l~cnt o~ i~ Co~uniW Develop- ment Pro~a~ Su~ activities may ~- chide ~e pro.ion of block ~ant ~- road spurs or similar extenziorm). ~ $70.204 Eli~bl~. nctlvit~e.~ t~y' p~vate nonp~fit entitlt~, l~ai d~clo~ent co~t/o~, or small buMn~sa v~t~nent co~ 6on~. (a) General AppHc~ ~y provide block ~ f~ for ~ amber neighborhood revlt~atlon and no~c development actlvl~l~ se~ Iorth t~ sec~on ~ be carried out by a prlv~ no~proSt ~W, local development poraUom pc Small B~iness ~v~tment Co~oration (SBIC). Appllcan~ are none~eless respo~lble for ensuring that blo~ ~nt f~ ~e u~cd by such entities ~ a maker co~lstent with tho requiremen~ of th~ Part and other pHcabIe ~er~l, state; or l~al law. S~ec~c requ~emen~ govem~g the ad- m~lstration of ~e ~e of Mock f~ds,by ~ enti~e~ are se~ Iorth in ~ 570.612. AppHcan~ ~11 a~o be respon- sible for ~e c~ng out applicable ~oment~ r~ew and cleamce s~ibHtgl~. For the pu~ose pi ~ ~ectlon: (1) A p~vate n~-profl~ entlt~ mean~ ~y neighborkood-ba~ed ostentation, co~omtlon, or association, duly or~- n~ed ~ promote and undertgke ni~ development actlvitl~ on a nog-for- pro55 b~, ~clud~g comm~l~ldo or~nSaglo~ with g neighborhood b~ ~d new community ~s~la/fo~ (2~ A ~alI B~ne~ ~ves~en~ Cor- rection (~IC) mea~ an c~ity 0r- g~Iz~ pu~uan~ t~ ~tion 3Ol(d) of the Small Bus~s ~v~tment Ac~ 1958 (15 U.S.C. 681(d)): and (3) A l~al d~elopment m~ an entity o~ed pu~u~t to. Title ~ pt ~e Hea~tar~, Economic Oppo~unity, ~d Communl~ Par~er- r~p Act of 1974 (42 'U.S.C. 2~81); an ena~ eligible for assurance ~der tion 502 of the Sm~ Busines~ ~v~- mcn~ Act of 1958 (15 U.5.C. 695): or other similar enH~y ~co~ted pur~ suan~ to ~de~l, Sta~e, or l~I lam ih) Activitf~ ~t~ble u~d~ ~ ~ 570.2~I- 570.203, and ~ 57~.205. Grant a~i~ance may be p~d~ by a~ applicant tv be uttllz~ by p~vate nonprofl~ ~ti~, ~IC's, or 1~I d~elopment ti~s Ior acU~tiex othe~e eligible for ~k ~an~ a~tance pu~uan~ ~ 570.291-570.203, and ~ 570.2~5. Such organizatlo~ may pro~qde facillHes eli- gible for assS/ance pursuant to ~] 201(c) and 570.203(b) which ~e not publicly o~ed, bu~ are nonetheless available for ~e by the general public d~ng all no.al h~ cf operation. (c) Community or neighborhood nc~ic d~el~e~t or r~itall2ation tt~ti~. G~$ ~ta~ance may be pro- 'Mstance for u~e by nonprofit entities, SBIC, or local development corporation~ for: (1) Assistance to new or existing small bmine:;s, minority businesses and neigh- horhood nonprofit businesses for (i) Work/nv capital or operational ftmcks i and iH) Capilal for ]and. structtu'es, prop- crty Improvements, and flxturc~:. (2) Capitalization of a SBIC or locaI development corporation .. required to qua/My for assist~nce under other ]Fed[- eral programs: (3) ~kssi~ta.nce to minority contractors to obtain performance bonding; or (4) Other activiHes, appropriate for commtmity or neighborhood economia development or revitaliz.xtton. Where an applicant proposes to fund such entitle.% to tmdertake t~Llvitles pursuant, to f. ht~ paragraph, the applicant, shall: (i) Provide iKUD with a complete de- scxiption of th~ proposed activity: (H) Provide i=IU-D with ~ description of the relationship of the proposed activity to the applicant's strategy for neighbor- hood revitalization or economic develop- ment: an/l (iii) Receive specific authorization from }IUD to undertake the activity'. ,~ 570.205 Eligible planning, urban virortmental deslgn~ environraetzl sludi~ aud atlmlnistratlve cos~. Grant assistance may be used'~or the following planning, design, ehvlron- mental and administrative costs: (a) Developynant el a Comprehensive Communiiy Development _Plan. For the purpose of this section, the term "Com- prehensive Community Development Plan" means a statement pc statements (in word~.'maps, Illustrations or other methods of communication) which iden- tify the present conditions, needs and major problems of the applicant's juris- diction relating to the specific objectives pi thc CommuniW Development Program as set forth in .~ 570.2(a) and set forth objectives, policies and standards to guide the development and implemen- tation of such Community Development Program. Activities necessary to develop a Comprehen.sive Community Develop- ment PIan may include: (1) Data gathering and studies notes- saw for the development of the Plan or tM components, lncludln%' thc production of base mapping and aerlal photosraphy in coordination with the U.S. Geological Sur~'ey, but excluding the gathering of detailed data and preparing of analyses necessary, for the engineering and deslg-a of facilities or activities Incllgible ,'or block grant assistance purauant ] 570.2061 REGISTER, VOL. 42, NO. 205---TUESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 1977 PROPOSED RULES ~2) De-oelopment o! statcm~ttx o! ~ectt~es. poHcl~ ~nd sb~d~ re.rd- lng proposed or for~s~ ch~gca ~e pr~ent con~o~ or pro~ ~- %ect~g ~e ~ppllc~g'~ Ju~dlc~o~ are ~ be addressed by ~xe Developmen~ ~og~m; (3) D~,elopmen/off ~ three-year munit~ D~elo~ent P~ which ldentt- ~ ~c co~l~y development, hot~- ~g, ~d econo~c conditlo~ ~nd needs. demo~ ~ comprehe~lve for mee~mg thee ne~ ~ sp~es ~ide ~e ~pp~c~t'~ Comm~ty D~vel- opmen~ Pro.am; (4) ~elateg plan~ing acti~tte~ tnclud- in~ th~ prep~a~on oI co~t~tde pl~ for l~d ~e, ho~g. open sp~e, rec~tio~ u~tl~, h~t~le prese~u- Hon, ~omlc development, nel~hbor- h~d p~se~tion. ~d (5) Colle~ffo~ of def~{~¢~ d~ta. prepg- rat~o~ of ~Mys~, ~g~eer~g ~d de- sl~ of fzc~ti~ ~l~ble for w~ch c~ be comt~ct~ wl~ end repulat~, nec~ for ~ ~- plemen~atlon of ~e pl~ (b) D~elo~cmt o/a mana~ze~t cap~ty so ~at the appll- c~t may: (1) Se~ long-[em and ~hort-~ · ]ectlve~ rdat~ to ~e comm~ty opmen~ ~d ho~g ne~ ol t~ (2) DevOe pr~gr~ and ~lvi~ meet ~ese go~ (3) ~b~sh ~ urb~ enviromen~l de~l~ ~ksWatlve capactW; (4) ~aluate the pro~e~ of such pro- ~a~ ~d ~vltlcs ~nd the exten~ mhtch, the goa~ and objectives have been accompl~hed; and 15) Ca~ eu~ ~e m~agemhn~, c~ ord~atlon ~d monttor~g oi ~e ti~'~d pro.nm ~ are a pa~ oi the ~pp!lc~t'~ Co~tty Developmen~ (c) C~prehe~ive planning activi- ties. ~ addition ~ ~e pl~n~g actl~tfes othe~e eligible for a~stance ~ season, ~s~t~nce tony be a~o pro- vid~ for comprehe~ive plant ~ctlvt- ties el~ble lot ~t~nce ~der the sec- tion 701 piing ~s~t~ce ~u~u~t to 24 ~ Part 600, tn metro- pollt~ cities ~ de~ed in ] 5~0.3(r), and ~ban co~tles, provided th~t such addltlon~l pl~g activities are n~- eas~ or aDDrop~ate to mee~ng tho meeds and oblectlves of the appllcan~' Community Development Program. Id) Administrative Costs. Payment reasonable a~istra[lve c~ts ~d ca~g ch~ges related to the plann~g and execution of community develop- ment activltic~ financed, In whol~ or p~t. witl~ fun~ provided under thM and housed activities covered ~ the plicant's Housing Aas~t:mce PI~n ~). C~t~ incu~ed in can~'ing out the progr~.m, whether charKed to program on a direct o~ an lndkcct baa~, m~t he In co~o~xnce with the requ~c- men~ of ~derM Management Circuit (t~IC) 74-4. "Coat Princlple~ Applicable to Gr.xnta and Contracts witt~ St~tte ~d ~M Govemmen~.i' All ite~ of cost ~d ~ Att~hmenC D, Section C of Clrc~ (excep~ Item 6, preagreemeng c~sts, which are elladble o~ to the ex- .mt au~ortzed In ~ 570.301(c) are M- lowmble.without p~or ~pprovml to the tent they co~titute re~onable costs ~d are othe~e eH~bl~ under th~ stlbpg~. (1) Elfgible progra~ ad~in~irafiion co~ts. ~e~onable ~t~tlve costs ~d s[~ ex~es ~clude ncce~a~ Den~r~ lot ~e il) SM~I~. wages and related of the applicant's s~ ~d ~e st~ loc~ public agencie~ engaged ~ out ~e p~: (H) ~vel c~ ~c~red for b~e~ ~ ca~g ou2 ~e prog~m; (fid A~iniatr5tive sauces pe~omed ~der th~d-p~y con~ac~ or manta. ~clu~g such ~ces ~ gen- eral leg~ sauces, accosted ~d aunt se~lces; ~d (Iv) Other c~ for g~ ~d ~qu~ed for adm~r~t~n of the pro- ~. lnclu~g such g~ and ~ rent~ and ms,ten,ce of o~ce ~pace. ~ce. ut~lties, o~ce ~DDIIes and rent~ or'p~ch~e of o~ce eq~p- menk (2) Th¢ ~{o~ o/ i~/o~a~[on and oth~ r~3ourcs~ to r¢~id~Rt3 and o~an~a[io~ p~rg~cJpat~ in the plan- minK.. ~plemen~at~on. montto~, or ev~uation of actl%~ties berg ca,ed out ~th bl~k ~t [un~. ~ may ~clude ~s~ce to neighborh~ organizatio~ In areas of concent~ted ~tlvlties or to city-wide org~%tio~ conduct~g .Wain~g or other ~tlvities desired to ~cre~e the c~p~bHIW of low- ~d mod- erate-~ncome pe~o~ to be ~volved ef- f~tively ~ the development ~nd pl~- ming of ~ comm~[ty development pro- ~m cons~tent ~th the applicable citi- zen pa~lctpation ~q~emen~ set fo~h M t~ P~. (3) Pr~otsion o/ ho~i~g $e~ic~ and other actt~tlcs desi~ to further the f~Ar hous~ prov~io~ of } 570.307(e) (11) and the ho~n~ objec- t,ye of promoting gre~ter choice of ho~n~ oppo~unit~ea and avold&n~ ~- due concen~t~ons of ~s~d p~rso~ ~r~ cont~nkn~ ~ h~h propo~on of lower-~ncom~ (4) Pro~on o/~auc~ fo p~/~anc~ bonding necessaw for con= trac%o~ ca~lng ou< ~ctl~ties ~s~ted wlth bl~k ~t f~. (5) Reasonable administrative costs rclatta~ to th~ pro,sion o/ rehabili~at~o~ loans under section 312 o~ the Hous~g Act or 1964. ~ amended. (6) Prop~ management. Reasonable costs of m~a~ng prope~ies acquired with block ~ant (7) Activities lo /acilitatc ihe implc- mcntation o/ g hozatnq ~s~tance plan for necessary expenses, p~or to con- stmctiom in plan~nK and ob~ain~ ~- nanctng for the new construction or i~:,nHal rehabilitation ol hou~ina ' lower- Income uerzons. AcHvlUes may clude: 56463 ¢i~ The costs of conducting pre ~l!mt- nary .surveys and anxtlses o! market needs; (ti) Site and ut~ty plans. desc~ptio~ of the pr~d co~t~c- tion, pre[~x~ c~t e~C~ates, ~d "sketch drawtngx", bu~ excluding archi- tectu~I, englncer~g. ~d ocher deta~ ord~rfly required for co~t~ction pur- poses, ~xch ~ s[~c~l, elec[nc~, plumbL~g, ~d mechanic~ /iti) ~e~onable co~ ~s~l~ted with development of appli~ons for mort- gage and inured Io~ co~itments and of appHcatio~ ~d pmp~ under the Section 8 ho~g ass~t~ce payments prog~m p~u~t to ~ ~ P~ 883; and (iv) Pc~ ~s~ed ~Ith pr~g of applfcaHons ~or mo~ and lo~ co--fOments under pr~ms cludtng those adm~ered by Famers Home Adm~grsHoa ~d the ~ve~ment NsHonal MoP,age ~e new co~ctton or d~ ~g o~ new co~t~ctl0n o~ hous~g ~ no~ ~i~ble ~or ~t~ce ~der ~ (8) Consultant acttvities. AppHc~ m~ employ consul~s ~ Pro,de pro- I~lon~l ~s~t~ce ~ progrm pla~g. spp~c~tion precaution ~d ex~u~o~ activities, pro~d~ ~a~: (i) ~e requtremen~ o~ ~s ~C 7~. O~ Clrc~ar A-102. an~ pHcsble Fede~. St~ and loc~ laws complied ~: fid ~ere aha~ ~ a ~tten agree- ment ~tween the p~les whlch det~ respo~ibflltl~, standard, and a~ fees:' (iii) Compensgtt~ for ser~c~ by con.tang shah onl7 be made for: ¢~) ~e regsonable c~ of ~on~ se~tces, w~ch sha~ be ch~ged on ho,~ly b~ per pa~og and ~hich ~ no case on a per parson b~Is exceed ~e m~um d~ily rg*~ of compe~zflcn for a G~I8 ~ ea~bl~hed by law; {B) Re~sonable ¢~ta for overhead travel exPe~ ~c~ed. (e) Environm~tal Stud~. ~e rea- sonable eos~ of en~ro~enKM gecessaW to comp]7 with 24 ~ Pa~ 58, ~clud~g project specie en~onment~ asse~menh and clear~ces lot ~tb~ties eligible /or ~s~nce ~der hh~ ParL ~ S7~.206 Ineli~le actlviti~. ~e fo!lo~ng list of ex~m~I~ of ine~- gible activities h merely ~u~trative. and d~s not co~titute a Mat of ~ ~eli~ble ~tl~tlcs: (a) Public ~or~. ]adlities and other improvements. ~e general ~e that public wor~. fac~iti~ and'~ite o~er ~rovemen~,ara ~eli~ble to be acquit, constructed, r~o~tmcted, re- habilt~ted or lm~lled ~!~s they are eligible ~ursuant to t 5~0.201(c) or f 570.203(b), or were prevlo~ly eligible under any 0i the prograw~ by ~e Act lexcept the ~ublic iaci!ltles loan prograra, the model citl~ proir~, and ~ an urban renewal Icc. M ad eliuble ~der section lI0~d)~31 Housln~ Ac~ o[ 1949) and cited in (bi. ~ere acquhttlon of real pro~erW ~clu~es an exbt~g ~Drovcment which FEDERAL ~EGISTE~, VOl. 4~, NO. :205--TUESDAY', O¢'~OBER ]5, 1977 .~'t~ tlt, ilized In the provisior~ of ~ acquk~itton cost att~bu~bIe ~ s~h ~- provement, ~ well ~ ~le c~t of aI~' re- h~bflt~Uon or conversion under, ken 3dspt or ~ke tile proDe~ s%~table for such ~e, sha~ be ~ellglble. Ex~pl~ of fmc~ which c~ot be Drovid~ theso f~m~ ~clude ~e follo~ng: 11) Bmldin~s and facilities /or th~ general cond~t o/ gov~nm~t, such city ha~ and other headquar~ra government where the governing bod~ of tho rectpien~ m~ re~l~ly and which are predominantly reed for nici~M p~, co~tho~, police sta- tlom and o~er m~lclpal o~ce. 12) F~lttte~ l~cg J~ e~Aibilto~s, ~pectator ~ts an~ culturat purples, tnclu~n~ stature, spor~ ~ren~ audi- torito% concert ha~a. c~tml and cente~.' c~ventlon centem and e~bl- tlon ha~. museum, central libraries, and s~flar /acillt~s. For the pu~e of thB p~agmph, ~bm~ (Including centmt Iibm~ea in ~i~ o~ gene~ locM gov~en~ under 10.000 ~pulatlon where ~e crttefl~ set forth ~ I 570.201 lc) (4) (fl) are sat~fled), c~tur~l, a~. anti m~em facilities w~ch meet the xequ~emen~ for netghborh~d lac~ ties set forth tn I 5~0.201(c) (4) are con- stder~ neighborhood ~cflltles and are fl~erefore ellglble for ~sS~nce. (3) Schools and educalion~ [adlilie.,. t~clu~g elemental, secondaw~ cot- lege, and ~lvemtt~ facilities). For the pu~ose of thS.pam~aph: (1) & neighborhood laciUty, senior cent~ or cent~ for the handi~ped which cl~a in practical and v~attonM actlvt¢l~ (such ~ flint aid. homema~g, ~af~. tndep~dent ll~n~, etc.) are among the se~c~ prodded or ~ enable p~ng 'to I 570.203(b) ~ not conslde~ ~ a ~hool or educa~onal facl~; (H) Any faciBty elistble for hs~t~ce p~uant 'to ~ 530.201(c), which .~ si~ed p~murily for a public pu~e other ~ education M ~ot co~dered to be a sch~l or cdtlcationat fac~ty where, althou2h it ~ to be l~ated on site controlled by a school d~t~ct, board or ~lar body r~po~ible for ~ubEc education, the facility wiE only be used by any adjac~ school or edu- catlonM fa~ity on 5n ~cidentM basis. In order to' dete~e whether thc f~- clllty ~ ~o be ~ed on an ~cidental basis.' the ~Dplican~ sh~ll at & m~Imu~ demon- ~tratethat; (A) After ~choo] hou~ and on week- ends, the f~cilit~ ~h~]l be ~v~able for use by 'the general public to ~%e same extent ~ s~milar f~c~ltles · withKn the applicant's jur~dtctlon: and (B) Du~nz sch~{ hours, the facility Is not used for school pu~ose~ for more than four hours each day. · (4) Alrporis, subways, trolley liaes. bu{ or o~h~t transit t~mi~al3, or ~lons, and other transportation ,exclud~g rnHroad sp11~ assured pur- muant to t 570,203(.c) or facHities eligible under ] 570.203(b) ). medlc~ ~ac(lilts. For the pur~e 6f this PROPOSED RULES par.xgraph, a nel.3hbort)ood facility, sen- ior ctql[er, center for the handicapped, or facill~/ eligible In.usnr to t 570.203 (bl which pro.de general h~lth Ic~ Is not co~idered to be a medlcM facility. (6) Treatment wor~v /or se~ge or industrial wastes o/ a liquid nacre. eluding ac~ml treatment facfllH~. In- terceptor se~ and ou~a~ sewers. ~o te~ "interceptor s~" gppll~ ~ tho following: (1) ~ those situatio~ where mw or ~adequately treated sewaae ~ b~g d~- charged from an ex~t~g public sewer, those l~es w~eh are n~esa~ to pre- vent or e~te the discharge ~to ~y wate~ay of raw or ~adequatcly t~ted sewugo ~om gn e~t~g po~t or po~ of d~c~rge ~ a pt~c s~s~m ~e ~l~ble. Th~ ~clud~ any neceam~ pump~g station, force mai~ or other a~pu~e~nees thereto; and (H) ~ all o~her situation, the l~e or ~es which divert ~e flow to the meng facUl~ from the point of hat.al dBcharge of ~ coUeetlon system, were no ~eatmeng to be pro~ded, lnclud~g any necessary pump~g station, force ma~s or oZher app~enances am no~ eli~ble, (b) Purchase'of equipm~t. ~e p~- chase of equipment wi~h bl~k ~ang · f~ is generaUy ineligible. (I) C~z~u~iom' eOuipment. ~e pur- chase of construction ~pmen~ ~ ~- eli~ble, bu~ compensation for ~he ~me of such equlpmen6 through Ieasing; dep~- clarion or use allowances pursuant to Attachmen~ B.of O~ ~re~ar A-102 for an othe~e eHgible acridly is an eligible me of blcck grant ftmdm ~ ceptio~ B the ~ch~e of cmm~ctio~ ~utpment which B pa~ of u solid waste ~o~I fa~li~ w~ch ~ ell~ble for block ~rant ~tance p~uan~ to { 5~0. ~i lc) (5). .. (2) Fu~in~s an~ personal property. ~e pureh~e of equipment, ~x~es, fum~h~gs or other personality not ~te~al stmmtural fixture Is ineligible. except when nece~sa~ for use by a re- cipient or i~ sub~antees ~ the istragion of i~ Community Develo~menb Program U~uang to ~ 5~0.205(d). fo) Operatin~ and maintena~e penses. ~e general ~e ~ that any ex- Dense associated ~tk oper~t~g. raining or reDal~g public facilities ~n~ wor~ or any expense associated ~-ith pro~ding routine public se~ces B ~- eIi~bIe for ~sistance. ~owever. opem~- lng ~d maintenance ex~nses ~sociate~ wit~ provid~g Public se~ic~ or assurance o~he~ise eligible for assB%- ance under th~ Part may be ass~t~. For example, the 'cosg o~ a public sergice lng operated ~ block ~ant funr~ a neighborhood facility may include reasonable e~enses ass~iated with crating the ~ubllc se~ce ~th~ the ctllty, includ~g' cos~ of rent. utilities and mMntcnance. E~mpl~ of activiti~ which ~e no~ ~igible for block grant ass~t~ce are: (1) Ms,ten,ce and repair of s~ee~. ~rks. playgrounds, water and sewer facilities, neighborhood facill~as, se~or centers, centers for' the handlcapped. parking and similar p~blic facilities: (2) Payment of sale.r-ica for staff, util- ity eo~ts and similar cx~nse~ neces- sary for the operation of public work_~ and facilities; ~d ~3) ~e~es associated with provi- sion of ~y public se~ice which is no5 eH~ble for ~.5t~e p~suant to ~ 5~0.- 201(e~. id) G~al gov~nmeni e~sex. ~s~ required to ca~ out [he regular r~s¢o~ibilitles of the ~it of general 10mi government are no~ eU~ble. Ex- m~lea include aU- ord~a~ general gove~ent e~endi[~es no~ relat~ the Co~uni~y Development ~ouram and not relat~ to ac~ti~, ell~ble der t~ subBart. (e) Political ~tivities..No ex~n~e may ~ mdc for the use of ~ulpment or Brem~es for ~lltlcal p~o~s, ~pon- so~x or eonduc~g c~didates"m~t- lug, engag~g ~ voter registration acti~ ity or voter transportalion or o~er pa~an political ecliptics. if) New ~sing ~nst~cti~. ance may not be used for the consist- lion of new pemanen~ ~sidentiM stmct~ or fac~ti~ t~ch ~ dom/- to~es. ~oup homes and hagway homes), or for ~ pm~m to su~idSe or such new comtmctio~ ~cept. as pro~d- ~ ~der the laa~ reso~ ho~g sto~ get forth ~ 24 ~ P~ 43. For Du~ose of thB para.apb, actiones sup~o~ of ~e developmen~ of low- or moderate-income ho~g ~ accord~ce with aa approved Hous~g Plan inchxding clearance, site ~sem- blage, provision of site and pm~on of public improvements and certain ho~- lng pr~omt~tiou cos~ ~ fo~h ~ 570.205(d) (~>, ~e nde consider~ programs to subsiEz. ~ ~u~uce new residbn~M co~t~ct~a. (g) l~orr~ ~ents. ~e, genial rffie 5 that ~sStance ~MI ~o[ ~ used for income pa~ for ho~g or any come paymeu~ iaclude ~e follow.g: ~ymeu~ for i~ome matut~ce,' ho~z allowances, do~ paymen~ and mortgage subsidles. (hl Payment o] assessments. W~le ~5~ce may be mud dRectly to pro- vide eligible Bublic ~grovemenB. such ~ streem, sidewal~ ~d utEties, w~c~ an applic~Z might noma~y provide t~ough speckxl ~sessmeut of benefit- ing properties, f~ds may no~ be reed W pay spec~l a~e~meuts lexq~ a~t p~cela of rem es~te ~ ~h~ of the pro~e~ o~e~. ~ some cases, canto mxy ~rovide eHgible public provemen~ ~rough pa~ent of a por- tion of ~e c~t with block grant fun~ ~rovided ~d the balance being ~ro- vided by s~tal assessments agaim~ 5enefiCt~g ~roperttcs pu~uant to law. However, ~ those instances where the cost or port~n of the cost of ~ub- He improvemenm were provided with program lunch, an applicant shall in no instate later le~ any special assess- men~ which shah recoup any ~omion of ex>endltures p~d by proem funds. (il Industrial park devcto~menL generM ~le Is that. notwtt~[and~ o~er ~ro~sio~ of t~s subpa~. assSmnce for the development of FEDERAL R"GIST£R. VOL. 42, NO. 205--TUESDAY, OCTOB';R 25. 1977' .,1 parks ks '.nell;~ble unless the ,t can d~nortatrat~ to the ~at~fac- ,ff ~e ~ecreta~y that there M ,~t available for such developmen~ r:dly, ~m a~pI~cant should · tha~ It ha~ ~m commitm~t~ public or priva%e entities for. ~e ~ such lnd~triM park developmen~ Subpa~ ~Entit[em~nt Grant~ L300 ~.d~ne of appllcaHon r~ qulremeztl~. 'tS s~flon b~e~ out.es the -mcn~ which mtn; ~ met 'by R~e ,cant when aDply~g for ~ enCtle- I. g~g ~d .~{erences other secHo~' .tin~g mo:e det~ ~ormation on. ) Plan~inq req~rement~. ks tha~ ~e applic~ m~t m~ n~ l~ co~W develoDme~t .r~ ara cove~. ~ the follow~g ~ 8ectioa 570,301 d~cdbes gener~ ,~g consideration; · ) ~tl~ 570.302 desc~bes ~e ement that Lhe appncant's eom- dry development prv~ m~t mcq ~d c~ed.out so. ~ to Uy be~t p~o~ hav~ low~ ~d te~-mcome: and' D 8~Uon 5~0.303 d~bes ~e re- 'ement ~at the appllc~t mus~ ~e ~d' ~plement a ~tten citing tlelpa~a ~1~, p~ of ._which Dro- 'a for ci~ ~volv~ent ~ ~e a~ng proce~. , b) Trtennta~ submission require- ~ts. ~te~ ~kd year, b~n~g flr~ appltcaMon submittal on or ~- Ap~] I, 19?8,.the appHgant m~t sub-. ; an aDpHc~Ho~ co,tag of the.roi-, '.;ace, p~c~d by O~ ~rcular No.. ,2) Co--unity Developmen~ PI~ ;cried in ~ 5?0.394; ,3) ~nual Co~l~ ~velopmeni ogmm ~ desc~bed in. a 570.305; ~4) Hou3tng ~s~t~ce Plan ~ de- rl~ la. ~ 5~0.~08; and- ~5) Ce~acatto~ .~ d~cribed i70.307. ' ~c). A~;nuak submissioa requir~eats. ~r each ot ~e o~er years In a three' -ac ~ ~e appHcan~ mu;~ t appHcat!on consts~g of the il) Standard Fo~ 424; (2) ~nual Ccmmu~ ~velopment. to.am ~ de~b~ m ~ ~3) m~l Ha~mg Action Progra~ ; described ~ { 570,305(5) ~5): ~ ~4) Ce~aca~o~ aa de~cribed 570.307. Id) Oth~ a~Dlicat~on requir~ents. 'he appHc~Lm~t also comply ~th ~e ~llowing rem;ircm~M when applying or an cntitlcm~t 1} Req~cmen~ on-~e t~ing of ,licatlon3 ~ ~e~ forth m ] 570.3~8; .. ~2) Requiremen~ on notgy~g ~c m~c t~t ~e aOpacaHon ha~ been ult~ ~nd. ~ avttl~ble ~ );~rtlm upon r~L ~ dc~c~bed 5~0.3~9; &nd ¢3) l~equixemenM on notifying State and areawidc clcaxinghouse~ of the ~ pUc~t's ~t~t to apply for Feder~ a~ce. on suhmit~ng ~e appHc~tio~ to ¢lc~ghm~e for co~ent, and k~g ~tio~; follow~g ctearinghouse reviews, ~ described Int 570.310. ~ 570.301 t)la.n;.g considerations. ' (a) Comprche~Ive nei~hb~hood re- vit~kation. It ~ ~D. ~Hcy ~ eh- co.age the ~e of bl~k gran~ fun{~ i~ ~ concemtrat~ m~er in order to produce suk~n~al long-te~a imDrove- men~ ~ the comm~ty. ~e applicant ~ s~c~c~y enco~xg~ ~ ca~ ou~ strategy Ior compreh~ive neighborhood r~lt~aUon-w~ch concertinas sum- trent reaoumes to stahmze ~d up~ad~ reMdentia~ ~em~ ~t~d by blight and tie. Hexagon. A comDrehe~[vc horh~ re~Hzatlon pro~ la de~ed ~ one whi~: ~ 1) ~cm~es on a slum or bligh~d area w~ la deM~ated by ~e applicant for concen~d ~eatment; such area be of m~geahle s~e and condition, physical and o~e~se, so thst block ~ant and o~er r~ources to be com- mitted to ~e area can sut~n~ally meet the ldent~ed' physicS' developmeng and houstn~ nee~ wt~n ~ t~ee- ~ five- year pe~od: f2) ~ c~ed ou~ in accordance ~th ~ local plan wlfick pro.des for c~rdlnm~ pro.am ot phygic~ devel- opment achilles, necessar~ public f~lli- ties. and se~ces, private investment, and citizen se~-help scUrRies: and (3) Coor~ngtcs the effo~s of public and p~vat¢ agencie~ ~d netghborho~' oral.aHOY. ~ac'number and '~Uon of activities' which v~ qualify a proem ~ ¢omDrehe~ive v~H depend cn ~a con. Son and n~ of the area. ~amplea' of ¢omprche~lve ~d re~llzation' pro~ include: ~sidential rehabilitation program w~ch. pro.des lo~ and ~an~ to c~e~' tn a desi~a~d area In w~icb street improvement, play~o~, and' pubEc se~cc~ arc a~o being pro~qded; and ~ redcvelo~ent pro~ which dud~ ~s~matic demoli~en of sub- ~nda~ structures and ~emblage ~l~s for new cov~tmc~on ~ a par~c~ar area In conj~cti~ ~ st~e improve- men~ ~d laci~ necess~ to attract ~ew. dcvelopm~t. -' ~eugh a comprehensive neighbor- hood re~L~tion area m~t be residen- tial. It may include netghborh~d com- mercial faci~tte3.xv~ch are n~sa~ m~tain ~ ~ability of the ar~. order for a pm~m ~ quMlfy as a eom- p~mslve, n~borhoo~ re~tallzatioa ~t ~ud~' tn such proem (tnclud- ~g activl~ to be fund~ and merited In more than one action sMH be ~ouped mhd deemed by the pHcxnt ~o be a prolog, as deflned-Ln fi4 C~ f ~a.3. The environmental review o[ suah vroicct ~ld ~ke ~to accomnt ~o relationship between component ~tic~, and the cdmulatlve en~ron- (b) Pla~minq and i?nplc~nentinq multi- veer proY¢cts. (1) Under ~e enticement gr~t proc~, the applicant c~ rely o~ t~e~, a~ual financi~ ~sistance ~4th a high degree of certeS. Th~ makes It po~ible for Hie ~DD[tc~t tO plea mul~year projcc~ to bc ~anced m tn- cremen~ with entitlemen; f~d5 be- co~g av~ablc tn ~ucc~sive program yca~. ~ &ppHgant may, t~ere~ore, pro- g~m f~ in ~ application for ~e payment, of part of ~e cos~ of such mul~e~ project, pro~dcd ~e full ac~pe ~d ~ated cos~' of the tot~ proJec~ are deacribe~ la me fl=t appll- ca~oa ~ wni~ enCtlement I~ am alloca~d for ~e proJeck ~ d~s preclude ~e of subsequent ye~ merit f~da to comple~ a prolect which' was desired ~ a s~gle ye~ project and whose cost exc~da ~itlM est~at~. (2) Thc envi~ental ~sesament a m~tiyear p~jec~, pe~o~ed under 24 C~ Pa~' 58, shoed cncomp~a the ~e mult~eac scape o~ ~tl~tie:. Upon certmcation ~mt the apPHc~t h~ plowed ~c en~ro~enal requ~emen~ for a ~lt~ear project, ~ may ~sue i~ re~e~e ot f~ for ~he entre multi- year proj~t. Such rckase of tun~ shall. be subJ~t ~ the pr~o~ of grap~ (3) ~d (4) of ~ subsection. t3) ApprovM of eack Lncrem~t of a m~tiy~c prej~ ~ }ubj~ to ~e gen- e~ av~abth~ of enti~lemcn~ adequate Dedo~ce, ~d ~e submB- sion of an. acce~table aD~Hcatton tn eack ye~ Lq whi~ en~cmenr f~ are to be applied ~ow~d payment of proj~C cost. ~ ~ose ~l~c~ where ~e c~t ~ha~M previo~ly approved tl~i~cn~ f~a ~etore me new mere- merit ~ approved. ~e aDgRc~t may ob- ligate and s~d I~M f~ ~ cont~u~ ~e work ~d be re~b~ed ~ approv~ for the next recreant, pro- xqd~ ~e loca~y f~d~ work was ~- dert~cn, in compH~ce wl~ ~e ments of ~ Pa~. (4) ~e conL~u~ au~ort~ of an plic~t ~ c~it ~Ue i f~ ~ m~Lly~r proj~t and ~ be re~b~ed for c~- of such project, after ¢omple- ~on' of envko¢~en~l r~emen~ ~d ~ rel~e of f~, 5~ be subJcc~ to ~a' confined relev~ce. ~d pletenes~ of ~c env~o~l men~ performed. ~ theev~t of any sig-. nific~ or subs~d. ~ge ~ ~e t~e, m~i~de or ext~t oL the proJeat~ or ~y- s~cant or subs~ntial ia ~c ea~o~ent ;~t~g ~e p~ject, ~e app~cant ~H, p~or to ~y f~ther co~ent of ~ I f~ to the proj- ec~ complete ~e r~u~em~5~ of 2-i C~ Par~ 5k r~ating ~ the updat~g of en- t5~ ~e appli~t may also. be b~s~ for c~ ~cu~. to comple~ ac- ~vit[~ previo~ly approv~.~d ~der ~e ~ban renewal, proart, khe w~ter and sewer fac~tl~ pro.am. ~e neighborh~d f~itl~ program, or ~e open space l~d pro~m, d~crihed } 530.I(b)~ (I). t3), (-t). ~d ~6). r~pec- tively ~'ith ftmd5 prog~ed,[~ ~e pi[cat!on for b~k ~n~ ~,ds to cover thee c~ FE~)EIIAL IIEGISTEtt, VOl. 42, NO. 20S---TUESDAY, OCTOBER ~5, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: November 28, 1977 TELEPHONE (612) 472/1155 Leonard L. Kopp, City Mar~r Don Levens, City PlannerX(~- Community Development (4th year funding) 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 Under the Community Development fourth year funding, the revised entitlement for the City of Mound is estimated'at $100,062.00 based on 1973 census data and decision by mun- icipalities not to participate in the program. The final funding entitlement will be determined by HUD in January. 164 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota January 13, 1978 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-13 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: The City Manager SUBJECT: Meeting with Commissions Information Memorandum 77-198 (Pages 997-1007) reported the possi- bilities of tax increment financing. As a result of that discussion, the Council established January 17, 1978 as the date to meet with all the Commissions; The Housing Authority, The Planning Commission, The Park Commission, The Youth Commission, etc. The Planner has obtained a slide presentation on tax increment financing which will be shown on January 17th. Leonard L. Kopp BLVD g ======================== VILLA LAN~' ~Z vi ?/ %% CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota January 13, 1978 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-14 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager Tuxedo Easement An easement can be obtained for Lots 21, 16 and 17, Block 10, Arden by exchanging land the City will have left after relocating the sharp curve on Tuxedo. The easements required from Lots 21, 16 and 17 are: Permanent Easement - 342 square feet (in red on attached map) Temporary Easement - 2018 square feet (in blue) 13 Trees will have to be taken - many maples The City acquired Lots 18, 19 and 20 for relocating the curve. After the curve is relocated, there will be 5,875 square feet of land unused. This piece of land will be triangular in shape. The owner of Lots 16, 17, 20 and 21 proposes to give the City the ease- ment for the land remaining in Lots 18, 19 and 20. He already has land for two building sites and this land would be added to the present sites. The building site division requested is: Parcel A - Lots 16, 17, 18 and a small part of 19 Parcel B - Lots 21, 22 and that part of 19 and 20 not used by the road Since the land left of the City's property is less than 6,000 square feet (a building site), this trade is recommended because it will pro- vide two adequate building sites. Leonard L. Kopp u/ '/~)~j / / / / / I I oo i CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota January 13, 1978 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-15 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: The City Manager SUBJECT: Tuxedo Easement An easement for Lots 1 and 2, Block 10, Devon, can be obtained for $100.00. Two hundred square feet of land is to be taken (see map attached). The payment is recommended. Leonard L. Kopp DEVON Cot-. ,9~c.24, T /,'?, ~24- ROAD CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota January 13, 1978 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 78-1 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager LMCD - Dock Use Ordinance Councilman Fenstad says: "Please read and study carefully for discussion at Tuesday's meeting". A copy of the proposed LMCD Ordinance is attached: It appears that the present City Dock Licensing Program is covered in Subdivisions 14 and 15 and we will have to abide by the rules set up in Subdivisions 10 and 11. Subdivision ll(c) allows a dock each 50 feet. Variance can be had pursuant to Section 3.04 which is unknown at this time. Subdivision 14(b) allows docks in front of each landowner "for the sole use of the occupants of the residence which front is on the abutting lakeshore" However, ll(d) says that contiguous lakeshore area shall be 200 feet. It appears that this ordinance curtails the number of docks allowed to those people on lakeshore only, except in a few cases. Possibly this has been misread and their intent is to allow Mound to continue as in the past, but this should be made sure. Note: The ordinance is noted for the LMCD Committee Discussion only. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO DOCKS, DOCK USE AREAS, BOAT STORAGE DENSITY, AND THE STORAGE OF WATERCRA3T ON THE LAKE: AMENDING LMCD CODE, CHAPTER III For committee discussion purposes only. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ORDAINE: Section 1. LMCD Code, Section 3.01, is amended to read as follows: 3.01. DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1. For the purposes of this chapter the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. "Dock" means any wharf, pier, or other structure constructed or maintained in the lake, whether floating or not, including all "L's," "T's" or posts which may be a part. thereof, whether affixed or adjacent to the principal structure. Subd. 3. "Multiple dock or mooring area" mea~s any dock or m, oorinM w. ithin a nonresidential authorized dock use area or as allowed under Sec. 3.0,2~ Subd. 11. Subd. 4. "Mooring" means any buoy, post, struct-u~e or other device at which a watercraft may be moored and which is surrounded by navigable water. Subd. 5. "Authorized dock use a~ea" means that area in the lake which may be used for docks, moorings, boat storage, swi~ng floats, ski jump storage, or diving towers, or which may be enclosed on three sides for any of these purposes. Subd. 6. "Residential authorized dock use area" means an authorized dock use area for use by persons occupying, residential structures located on shoreline sites. Subd. 7. "Nonresidential authorized dock use area" means an authorized dock use area p~ovidin8 watercraft storage facilities at nonresidential sites and shall consist of commercial ma~ina,..private club~ municioal: and transient authorized dock use areaS:m and shall include all watercraft stored for use on the lake. a) "Commercial marina authorized dock use area" means a nonresidential authorized dock use area 10~oviding multiple watercraft storage facilities for rent or hLre. b) "l~ivate club authorized dock use area" means a nonresidential authorized dock use a~ea providing multiole watercraft storage.facilities by a~ nonorofit club for the exclusive use of its members. c) "Municipal authorized dock use area" means a nonresidential autho- rized dock use area pr.oyiding multiple watercraft storage facilities for rent or ire bz a municipality.~ d) "Transient authorized dock use a~ea" is an authorized dock use area established for %emnorary s~orage Of %ransien~ watercraft in suspo~t of a non- residential lake shore establishment. Subd. 8. "Site" means any shoreline lot, parcel or other piece of property legally subdivided and recorded in the office of the County Recorder. Subd. 9.- "Slip structuzre" means a structure designed solely to secrete a watercraft for the purpose of p~o%ecting it from damage from sun, wind, storm or rain; the term does not include boat houses, decks, roofs or s~milar structures. Subd. 10. "~oa% house" means a permanent year-round boat shelter. Subd. 11. "Deck" means a struct~e other than a dock, or element thereof, measuring more than six feet in length or width, located above the su~face of the lake and designed for use as a platform, floor, cover, or any combination thereof. Subd. 12. "Roof" means a permanent dock cover. Subd. 1 ~. tion on water. "Watercraft" means any contrivance u~ed or designated for navi6a- Subd. 14. "Boat" means a watercraft customarily stored on the water including motorboats and sailboats.~ but not includin~ all watercraft customarily sto~ed on shore and used in the summer shore zone~ and non-motorized watercraft uo to 16 feet~ mgtorized .watercraft up to 16 feet and uo to: but not in excess of, 10 horse- power, paddleboats, canoes and other non-motorized devices intended for use close to shore. Subd. 15. "Boat density classification criteria" means the standards .~uidelines adooted b~ the LMCD establishing, classifications for de~aTees of boat use in v~iovm pa~ts of the lake. Subd. 16. "Summer shome zone" means that area of the lake within 150 feet of the shore line or an authorized structume. Subd. 17. "Commercial or nonresidential dock" means a dock or dock structure owned and operated by .a muni..ci.~ality, or a dock used in con~unction with a com- mercial or other revenue producing business enterprise including a _u~ivate club. Subd. 18. "Launching facility" means any access to or from the lake including a dirt roadway, fabricated ramo, track, mechanical cont~ivance~ or other device or construction used in transferring watercraft fz. om land to water. Subd. 19. "Private club" has t.he meaning given bY Minnesota St.a~. t_es., Section 540.07, Subdivision 15: the term does not incIude a homeowner's association~ am. outlot association, or other s~m~lar or~.anizations whose membership is restr_icted to, or comprised in major part of, owners of property not abutting the lake who have an interest in or right to use an outlot or similar tract or oarcel of land located on the lake. A private club that does not have as its primary ouroose to promote, teach and conduct a water related sporting activity shall for the puroose of this o~dinance be considered as a commercial marina authorized dock use area as defined in Section 3.01, Subdivision 7(a) and Section 3.02, Subdivision 12. 0nly, private clubs that have a primary purpose to p~omote, teach and conduct a water related sporting' activity and maintain an LMCD approved schedule of suoervised water ~e~ate'd spo~ing events will be included as a orivate club as defined in Section 3.01, Subdivision ~'(6') and Section 3.02, Subdivision 1~. 153 Sec. 2. LMC]) Code, Chapter III, is amended by adding a new section to read: 3.011 t Polio,y: Pt~pose. Subdivision 1. Policy determinations. The Board of Directors of %he LMCD finds amd determines that: a) extensive platting amd development of lsmd o~ %he shore of the lake is occ~v~ring amd is likel,y to occ~ in the future; _b) such ~lat%in~ and develonmen% di~ec%l[ and indirec%!y increases the storage of boats along the shore of the lake; .c) there appea~s to be a demonstrable relationship between boat storage on the lake and %he intensi~y of boa% usage on the lake; and d) the intensity of boat storage on the lake shore has the effect of: d~m~nishimg the aesthetic smd recreational qualities of the lake~ increasin~ congestion along the shoreline endamgerin~ %he s.a~.ety of users of the lake; reducing the to%al a~ea of lake s~face available for ~ublic use; adverse_l.F affecting wildlife amd its habitat on the lake and along the lake shore; amd polluting the lake amd its shore. Subd. 2. Purpose. It is the purpose of this chapter to carry out the LMCD's .statutory. r. esponsibility under the enablin~ act to sec%~e the safety of the public and to insure the most general .pu.b. lic...us.e~ of the lake. It shall further be the purpose of this chapter to identify and establish use standards for the waters abutting the shoreline of the lake that will be used for boa~ storage purooses and to classify them either residential o~ nonresidential authorized dock use areas. Sec. 3. LMCD Code, Section 3.02, Subdivision 3, is amended to read as follows: Subd. 3- Exceptions: Modifications of Authorized Dock Use Area. a) Two adjoining site owners may, by mutual agreement, adjust these side site setback requirements or may use their combined authorized dock use areas fo~ a single common dock o~ mooring area for their respective private uses, but in a~y event, must observe these side setback requirements at the oute~ site lines of the combined sites involved in such a joint use. A dock or mooring area located, constructed, installed or maintained ~nder this provision shall not be considered a "multiple dock or mooring area.'; b) Existing Sites. A site in existence u~on the effective date of this ordinance in a residential area which does not meet the lake f~ont req~ir.~e- merits of Section 3.02, Subdivision 10, may be utilized for a residential authorized dock use area provided that all the following conditions are met: 1) That in the judgment of the LMCD such use does not adversely affect the most general public use of the lake. 2) That not more than one boat may be stored on a site with less than 50 feet of shoreline, existing as of February 5, 1970. That a site which has a lake frontage of 40 feet or more, but less than 60 feet, may have a dock extending up to 60 feet into the lake. Any such site which has a lake frontage of less than 40 feet may h~ve a dock which extends beyond the authorized dock use area to the_ 5 point necessary to reach a water depth of three feet, and no further; provided that no such dock shall be located or extended more than 60 fee% into the lake. Side setback requirements shall be observed, however, unless a variance is granted by the Board under Section 3.04. d) The length limitations prescribed by this ordinance may be adjusted ~mder the variance t~ovisions of Section 3.04 to allow the construction and maintensmce of a dock in the lake to a water depth of three feet at the outer end of such dock to provide adequate water depth for navigation and to urotect the environmental quality or natural habitat of the water adjacent to the dock. e) A 25-foot addition may be allowed at the outer end of a multiple dock in a commercial marina authorized dock use area for the puwpose of fuel sales and related service, but in no case for the storage of watercraft or rental of dock space. Sec. 4. ~CD Code, Section 3.02 is amended by adding subdivisions to read: Subd. 10. Residential Dock Use A~eas. A residential dock use area must con- rain a minimum of 100 feet of shoreline, excluding navigational channels for access only.~ to be measured at the elevation of 929.4 and be for the use of the occupants of a single dwelling unit. Only one dock structuzre is permitted and not more than two boats may be stored at. any dock within a residential dock use area~ exceot that three boats may be stored at a site containing 150 feet or more of shoreline. Mul- tiple dock struct-o~es will not be permitted for a residential authorized dock use area except as a variance under Section 3.02, Subdivision 11. Subd. 11. Variances: Residential Dock Use A~eas. Within aresidential area where, because of topography, environment or other unusual conditions unique to the a~ea, it becomes impractical to construct individual docks, a'variance may ~e. granted pursuant to Section 3.04 to allow the construction of a multiple dock structure subject to the following requi~eme~s: a) An environmental need, in the public interest, must be demonstrated to exist. b) An annual license is requi~ed by the LMCD for a residential multiole dock structure combining individual residential docks. c) Only one watercraft slip and one watercraft is to be permitted for each 50 feet of shoreline excluAing channels for access only, when residential docks are combined in a multiole dock structure. A lawful homeo%~ner's associ- ation may store watercraft at the rate of one watercraft per 50 feet of shore- line over the riparian lands of the fee owner and the association. 'Subd. 12. Commercial Marina Authorized Dock Use A~ea. A commercial marina authorized dock use area may be est~0tished if it meets all the following conditions: a) Except for commercially zoned smd licensed marinas in operation and existence as of the effective date of this ordinance, no new ma~ina operation shall be established on any bay without consideration of the ~CD boat density classification criteria, or where in the judgment of the LMO~ such use adversely affects the public safety or the most general public use of the lake. b) the ~% operate p~ri~r, ar~~ services to the _general b~-~ing~Sblic, including[ ~u{ not 1Lmi'4~l~' to, watercr--~ s--~or~ and m00ri~g £'acilit~.6~, r. epa~ towing,' la-0h6hlng, fueling, sanitary pumpouts~ and boa~ re~tal. c) The marina must provide trees amd shrubber~ on the premises 2o pro- %ec2 the shoreline visual amenities as viewed from the lake. d) The total number of watercraft stored for use on the lake shall not exceed the mumber auihorized by the license issued for the marina. e) The marina shall comply with all local, state and federal safety regulations applicable to facilities add services provide~. f) Except for commercially zoned amd licensed marinas in existence and operation ss of the effective d~{'e o£"this' or'dinahce, a marina shall have a contiguous minimum lake frontage of 500 feet excluding navigational channels used fo~ access only. Subd. 13. Private Club Authorized Dock Use Area. J~ nrivate club authorized dock use area may be established only when all the following conditions are met: a) Ail docks and watercraft slips shall be installed, owned and main- rained by a private club whose principal purpose is to !aromote~ teach and conduct a water related sporting, activity. The private club must maintain an approved schedule of supervised water related sporting events. b) Except for commercially zoned and licensed private clubs in operation and existe~C~ as o£ the effective date of this ordinance, no new nrivate club authorized dock use area shall be estab!isheR without consideration of %he LMCD boat density classification criteria. .9) The total number of watercraft stored for use on the lake shall not exceed the number authorized by the license issued for the dock. The mrivate club ~:hall comply with all local, state amd federal safety ~egula%ions applicable to i[acilities and services pr0vid~d. e.) A contiguous lake shore front footage o£ 500 feet excluding naviga- tionat channels user for access only, must be available. ~) The club must urovide trees ~d shrubbery on the premises .to .?rotect~ the shoreline visual amenities as viewed from the lake. Subd. 14. Municipal. Authorized Dock Use Area. A municipal authorized dock use area may be established only when all the following conditions are met: a) All watercraft storage facilities including moorings shall be in- stalled, owned and operated by a municipality. .b) All watercraft stored in the area must meet boat storage density requirements under Subdivision 10. _c) The total number of watercraft stored for use on the ls~ke shall not exceed the number authorized by the license issued for the dock. ~) The facility shall comply with all local, state and federal safety regulations apolicable to facilities an~ services Drovided. Subd. 15. Municipal.Dock Use Areas: S~ecial Designations. A municipality may de..si~q, ate all or a portion of a munition! authorized dock use area as a resi- dential authorized dock use area provided that: I .a) Each dock within the area complies with Bubdi¥isi0n 10. b) Each dock within the area is for the sole use of the occupants of the residence which front is on the abuttin~ lake shore site within the municipal authorized dock use area. .c) A single dock is allowed for each single family dwelling unit within the muDicipal authorized dock use area. d) If a portion of the municipal authorized dock use area is so desig- hated, the remainder o£ the area shall comnly with the requirements of Sub- division 14. The provisions of Subdivision 11 does not apply to areas designated as residential authorized dock use area under this subdivision. e) The municipality must provide trees and shrubbery on the premises to protect the shoreline visual amenities as viewed from the lake. Subd. 16. Transient Authorized Dock Use ~=ea. A transient authorized dock use area may be established only when all the following conditions are met: .?) All docks and w. atercra~..sl..ips shall be installed~ ov~ed'and main-. rained by a municipalit-y or municipally, licensed commercial establisb_ment. b) The docks and watercraft slips are for the exclusive use of %ra~nsient users of the commercial eStab!ish~ent and no watercraft shall be permitted to remain overnight. c) The authorized dock use area shall be contiguous to lake shore property owned or operated by %he nonresidential establishment in which the principal nonresidential structure is located. d) A contiguous minimum lake shore front footage of 200 feetsha!l be available. e) Transient facilities may not be converted to any other use. ~J Exceot for commercially zoned and licensed transient facilities in ooeration as of the effective date of this ordinance~ no new transient facility may be ~.~tablished without review under LMCD boat density classification c~iteria. g) The total number of watercraft temporarily stored for use in the lake shall not exceed the number authorized by the license issued for the dock. Trees and shrubbery must be urovided on the uremises to protect the shoreline visual amentities as viewed from the lake. Subd. 17. Leasing of residential dock use areas. No person may sell, rent or lemse any soace within dock use areas for watercraft storage purooses in any residential authorized dock use area. Subd. 18. Launching Facilities. A launching facility may be established if the following conditions are met: .a) The facility would not adversely affect the public safety or the ]orotection of the most general public use of the lake taking into consider- ation lake ~se and density a~d the ~dCD boat density cl~ssif~cation criteria. ~) An annual license is issued for its use and operation. ~c) Municipal approval has been obtained to assure control of and adequacy of parking a~d of roadway ingress and egress. 2) A minimum of 200 feet of take shore frontage is available excluding navigation channels used for access only,. e,) Rack or other multiple on la~d storage of more than two boats ~er 100 feet of shoreline in conjunction with boat launching .facilities are permitted 9nly in commercial marina, municipal or private club authorized dock use areas. .f) Launching facilities shall not be allowed in transient dock use areas. g) T~ees and shrubbery must be orovided on the p~emises to ..protect the shoreline visual amenities as viewed from the lake. Subd. 19. Lighting. No lighting in the area of the lake shall be so installed or directed so as to affect adjoining dock use areas or create a hazard to navigation. Subd. 20. Setbacks. New multiole dock use areas shall maintain side and length setbacks 1~ times the length of the largest boats to be served and stipways twice as wide as the length of the largest watercraft to be served, or ~0 feet~ whichever is ~_eater. At municipal zoning boundaries setbacks shall be doubled. All dockage must meet state Fire Marshall's code requirements. Subd. 21. A~p!ication to Existing Facilities. The u~ovisions of Subdivisions 10 through 20 of this Section 3.02 aooly to existin~ facilities which do not other- wise conform to said subdivisions as follows: a.) A nonresidential authorized dock use area lawfully in existence on the effective date of this ordinance may continue in operation but must con- form to all other aoolicable regulations of this chapter. b) A single family reaidential authorized dock use area lawfully existence on the effective :i?~te of this ordinance may continue in ooeration but must conform to all othez' applicable regulations of this chaoter. .q) All residential multiple dock struct-u~es lawfully in existence on the effective date of this ordinance may continue in ooeration but shall be brought into conformance with all re~mtlations of this cha0ter no later than ten years after the effective date of this ordinance. After 1.978: como!lance shall be at the rate of 10%per year. Sec. 5. LMCD Code, Section ~.021, is amended by adding a subdivision to read: Subd. 4. Commercial Watercraft. It is unlawful for any person to ooerate or maintain on the lake a watercraft, boat, raft or other floating structure, either free-floating or moored, which is desi~a0ed for use as a restaurant or an.¥ other co~vm~ercial use, except excursion boats operating from a bonafide commercial base. Sec. 6. I~{CD Code, Section 3.10, is amended by adding a subdivision to read: Subd. 8. District Mooring Areas. A District Mooring Area ma~[ be established on the lake if it meets all the fol!owin~ conditions: .a) Except for District Mooring Areas in operation and existence as of the effective date of this ordinance~ no new DiSt~i'6t"Moo~ing Areas may be established on any bay which is classified critical usin~ I2~CD boat density classification criteria. .._b.) The District Mooring Area must operate primarily to ..provide sailboat moorin~ facilities to the ~eneral oublic. 9) The facility must u~ovide trees and shrubbery on the premises to protect the shoreline visual amenities as viewed from the lake. .d) The total number of boats stored for use on the lake shall not exceed the number authorized by the permit issued for the facility. .e) The facility shall comply with all loca!~ state and fede_~al regula- tions applicable to facilities and services provided. f) A contiguous minimum lake front footage of 500 feet excluding navi- gational channels used for access only, must be available. This enactment is in effect on , 19 , in accordance with the Enabling Act of the District. It is enacted by a majority vote of all the members of the Board and has the effect of an ordinance. Attest: Thomas S. Maple, Jr., Chairman Frank Mixa, Executive D~_~ector 14J ON LAKE; lVlINNETONI(A INDIAN BURIAL MOUNDI~ 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 January 9, 1978 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Park Commission The City Manager Eagle Lane Access Last summer the Park Commission recommended that Eagle Lane be closed from boat launching. It has remained closed also for winter access. Mr. Herman Schrupp, 1652 Eagle Lane, has asked if this can be opened for winter access? cc: City Council TONKA U.S.A. Tonka Toys 5300 Shoreline Boulevard Mound, Minnesota 55364 Telephone: 612/472-8000 Telex: 290219 January 9, 1978 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Subject: Retroactive Sewer Bill Dear Mr. Kopp: We are in receipt of the retroactive sewer bill for that portion of water discharged into the Mound sewer system based on 70% of water purchased through our meter No. 4. Our Accounting Dept. is in the process of issuing payment for this bill. I just want to reiterate that the 70% quantity is our best estimate at this time and as we discussed, will be verified when the City of Mound takes flow measurements in the Spring. At that time the actual billing should be established and Tonka will pay any differences or receive credit for any difference between the measured flow and the 70% estimate. 'Thank you for your cooperation. Sin cere ly, T0 A ~?.~hJ. Profai~r P~ant Engineering Manager JJP: rmw cc: E. Peterson B. Hocks City of POLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT MOUND 1Month December Year '/7 I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS YEAR IdkST YEAR ACTIVITY MONTH TO DATE TO DATE Traffic control (citations & warnings) 387 2516 DWI 5 44 Property damage accident 10 140 Personal injury accident 1 67 Fatal accident 0 Adult felony & misdemeanor arrests 10 67 luvenile felony & ~nisdemeanor arrests 4 58 . Medicals 14 1Z0 Animal complaints 63 411 Part I & Part II Offenses 25 436 Other general investigations 438 4589 TOTAL 957 8,449 PROPERTY LOSS/R II. nY SUMMARY # ITEM STOLEN RECOVERED Bikes ....................... Boats ...................... Clothing $ 105 ........... Currency, notes, etc. $ 110 Jewelry & precious metals .................. . .... ~,uns ............ Home Furnishings ............ $ 65,000 Radio & Electronic equipment ....................... Vehicles & vehicle equipment ............ $ 10,000 Miscellaneous $ 293 $ 343' TOTAL (for individual city) $ 508 $ 75,343 ' GRAND TOTAL (all cities con~bined) $ 11,088 $ 83,339 III. OFFENSE ACTIVITY SUMMARY PART I CRIMESO~ ~ ~ ~ O~ ~° O ~ - Adul~ Juv. Hon~icide Rape ......... Robbe'~y' . ....... As sault 1 i 1....... Burgl.~ ry .. 1 1 1 La rceny . 8 8 1' Z Vehicle Theft TOTAL 10 0 10 0 Z 3 . , ,. , ~ ........ '~ ,, :.; ., : PART II CRIMES Arson ~orgery &[iC .o. Unte frei, ting ............ Fraud 1 1 ]Embezzlement' :- 1 ......1 1 ~ole'~ ProP_e.r. ty" . Yandalism 5 5 ?Veapons Prostitution ~ Commercialized Vice Sex Offenses 1 1 1 Na rcotic drug_ 1...a~v..s. . . 1 1 ~ 1 Gambling Offenses against f.amily & chii~'r~'~ ...... .Driving under..the inf!uFnce 5 ' 5" 5' ' .Liquor. Laws Public Peace 1 l 1 AIl other offens-es ....... TOTAL 15 o 15 0 8 1 TOTAL PART I & PART II CRIMES -, ~t loOLIC~/C RIME A C TIVITY REPORT Gftles of 1MOIJIWD, SPRING I~ARK, Month MINNETRISTA & ST. BONIFACIUS Dec. Year 77 I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS YEAR LAST YEAR ACTIVITY MONTH TO DATE TO DATE l'raffic control (citations & warnin§s ) 533 4954 DWI 9 71 Property danaage accident ZO 220 -' Personal injury accident 3 100 Fatal accident 0 1 ~dult felony & misdemeanor arrests 15 106 Juvenile felony & misdemeanor arrests 4 85 VIedicals 19 173 ~nimal complaints 92 . 603 Part I & Part II Offenses 43 607 Other gene ral inves'tigatlons 672 7541 ~FOTA L l, 409 14,461 PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SUMMARY Bikes Boats ITEM Clothing CurrencY, note's, etc. [exvelry & precious metals ~unS Flome Furnishings Radio & Electronic equipment Vehicles & vehicle equipn~ent Miscellaneous TOTAL $105 STOL~.N $ 734 $ 1,000 $ 3,519 $ 2,125 $ 3,605 RECOVERED $ 2Z6 $ 65,000 $ 3,500 $ 11,675 948 $ 11,088 $ 83,349 OFFENSE AC SUMMARY o Aflul~ Juv. ~ape ..... Robbery ...... . As sault 1 l Lateen 16 16 1 ~ehicle Theft 4 Z g TOTAL Z2 Z Z0 0 Z 3 :PART II CRIM]~S ir soil Forgery & Counterfeiting ._. Fraud 3 3 . 2' Ernbezzl.emen..t } l .1.., l ~to'l~n ProPerty ...... v .&Usm 'S f, ....... ~Veapo. ns l°rostitution'& Commercialized Vice Sex Offenses 1 Narcotic drug laves,,, 1 1 ' 1 .Gambling pffe. n,s,es against, fam-ily & children., Driving under the in,f~luence .... 6 6 .,, 6 .Liquor .Laws Public peace 1 .' 1 1 All other offenses 1 l 1 TOTAL ' 19 0 19 0 12 1 TOTAL PART I & ]PART II CRIMES 4l 2 39 0 14 4 west hennepin human services planning board 4'lst and Vornon South / St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 929-5533 TO: City Managers and City Clerks Please pass this letter and information on to your MaYor and City Council, It is important that elected officials as well as City Managers attend this meeting. west hennepin human services planning board 41st and Vernon South / St. Louis Perk. Minnesota 56416 TO: FROM: RE: West Hennepin Area Municipal Officials Marcy Shapiro, Director, WHHS Funding of Community Planning Boards I am writing to invite you to a meeting with some of the Hennepin County Commissioners regarding the resolution that the County Board is considering about the funding of Community Planning Boards. The meeting will be Thursda~ Januar. y 19, 1978 at 2:$0 p.m. at the Minnetonka City Hall, 14600 Minneton'ka ~u'levard. Commissioners Kramer and Robb from the West Hennepin.area as well as Commissioners Ticen {who introduced the resolution) and Spartz {who is Chairman of the Board's Health and Social Services Committee) have all agreed to attend. In addition, Commissioner Olkon has been "invited, but h~r a~ten~ance has not yet been confirmed because she is out-of-town. At a meeting hosted by WHHS on November 28, 1977, municipal officials agreed that there was a need .for direct discussion with the Commissioners. This meeting will be an opportunity to express your concerns about the resolution to the Commissioners and to begin this direct discussion. After this meeting with the Commissioners, WHHS with the other two planning boards {Northwest Hennepin and South Hennepin) will be drafting a resolution which can be acted on by all of the city councils that belong to the three planning boards. It was generally expressed at the November 28th meeting that this resolution ought to include the following points: support for the concept and the activi- ties of the planning boards, the responsibility of the County to plan and provide for human services, the maintenance of current levels of funding by the County, and the need for this funding issue to be resolved on a longer term basis, so that it doesn't surface every year. We would be interested in heari.ng your reactions to these points and any other points which might be made. We look forward to seeing you at this meeting. 133 WEST I{EN~E?!~; }IU~[A[: SERVICES 1977 and 1978 ~udgets Ccun ~y Funds Municipal Funds 1977 $37,272 &,235 $41,507 1978 $39,640 4,235 $43,875 *. ~.' 1~78., BudEet is 5.7% increase over 1977 * Projected 1979 Total Budget if there would over' i978 budget - $46,376 be a 5.7Y? increase 'lunicipal Contributions Deephaven Excelsior Hepk in s ~.lin n etonka ?[oun d Oron o Plym o~ th 'St. Louis Park Shorewood Wayzata TO?~_L ~'. of Popu!ati~n of ~'~est Hennepin Area 2.4 1.8 10.5 24.0 5.5 4.5 i5.3 30.7 2.8 2.5 100.0% Projected 1979 contributions if of projected 1979 budget 371 27~ 1,623 3,710. 85O 696- 2,365 4,746 433 396 15,45B 1/3 138 RESOLUTION NO. Commissioner , Chairman, offered the following resolution: Committee BE IT RESOLVED that for purposes of the development of the 1979 Community Planning Budget, and not withstanding other County policies established for the funding of community planning, staff be guided by the principle that County financial support shall not exceed two-thirds of the costs of eligible services provided by community planning organizations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in order to provide currently funded community planning organizations with sufficient lead time to develop additional sources of financial support in 1979, staff be directed to meet with representatives of these organizations to explain this policy and procedures for its implementation. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were~ and NAYS as follows: YEAS HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY OTHER Jeff Spartz Thomas E. Ticen Richard E. Kremer E.F. Robb, Jr. Sam S. Sivanich Nancy Olkon John E. Derus, Chairman ATTEST: Deputy County Auditor STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPART~[ENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT In the Matter of the Petition of the Cities of Minneapolis, Edina, St. Louis Park, Hopkins and Minnetonka, and the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board for a Basic Water and Land Management Improvement Project for Minnehaha Creek. In the Matter of the Application of The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for a Permit to Construct a new Minnehaha Creek Headwaters Control Structure at the Gray's Bay Dam Site, Lake Minnetonka. NOTICE OF JOINT HEARING A public hearing on the above-entitled matter will be held on Wednesday, February 8, 1978, at the Minnetonka City Hall, 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard. The hearing will begin4at 1:30 p.m., and continue at 7:30 p.m. The afternoon session is intended primarily for governmental testimony, the evening session for public testimony. The hearing is being held jointly by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed'District and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. The subject of the joint hearing will be a series of improvements which the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has been requested to undertake by the Cities of Minneapolis, Edina, St. Louis Park, Hopkins and Minnetonka, and the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers will consider the series of improvements con- templated by the petition of the municipalities listed above, as described in the preliminary engineering report of the district's engineer dated August 2, 1974, as supplemented by an amendment dated December, 1977. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Corps of Engineers will consider the applica- tion of the District for a permit for the proposed headwaters control structure at the Gray's Bay dam site, Lake Minnetonka. The Department of Natural Resources will also review and comment on the downstream improvements. The Corps of Engineers will issue a notice of hearing on the projects which will describe the projects, the regulatory authority of the Corps of Engi- neers and the scope of review by the Corps of Engineers, as well as procedures applicable to the decision to be made by the Corps. 1. Background. The proposed improvement project was initiated by petition of the Cities of Minneapolis, Edina, St. Louis Park, Hopkins and Minnetonka, and the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board dated September, 1973. The Board of Mana- gers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District directed t.he preparation of a preliminary engineering report on the proposed improvement, which report was submitted August 2, 1974. After receiving the preliminary engineering report, the Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District directed that a public hearing be held September 11, 1974 to determine whether the projects as described in the preliminary engineering report should be authorized by the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Thereafter, the Managers directed the preparation of plans and specifications and an environmental assessment of the project. Permit applications were also submitted to the Department of Natural Resources by the Minnehaha Creek 2 .1.35 Watershed District for the projects identified in %he pre- liminary engineering report, including a headwaters control structure at a site approximately 8,000 feet downstream of Gray's Bay dam. On July 28, 1976, the Department of Natural Resources issued notice of a hearing to be held August 11, 1976 on the permit application of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for a headwaters control structure and to review its determina- tion of an official ordinary high water mark for Lake Minnetonka (permit application no. 76-6240). The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers scheduled a hearing on the same project for August 11, 1976, to be held jointly with the Department of Natural Resources. The Department of Natural Resources issued permits for the downstream projects. On May 3, 1977, the Department of Natural Resources denied the District's application to construct a headwaters control structure at the site 8,000 feet downstream of Gray's Bay. Thereafter, the Managers directed the district engi- neer to update the preliminary engineering report to evaluate whether the alternate site III, as identified in that report, was practicable and would accomplish the intended purposes of the structure as envisioned by the petition. The engineer was also directed to update the preliminary engineering report as to the other downstream projects as necessary. The engineer submitted his amendments to the pre- liminary engineering report dated December, 1977. This amendment concluded that use of the alternate site III was practicable and feasible and in conformity with the overall 3 plan of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The amen~- men% also updated the preliminary engineering report as to the downstream projects. The preliminary engineering report and the amend- ments were submitted to the director of the Division of Waters of the Department of Natural Resources and to the Minnesota Water Resources Board as required by Minn. Stat. § 112.48, subd. 3, on December 22, 1977. The reports of the director of the Division of Water and the Minnesota Water Resources Board will be available prior to the hearing. 2. Project Description. A general description of the proposed improvements as described in the preliminary engi- neering report as amended includes the following: 1. A headwaters control structure for Minnehaha Creek to be located at the Gray's Bay dam site. The purpose of the proposed control structure is to (a) stabilize lake levels on Lake Minnetonka to the maximum practicable extent between elevation 928.6 MSL and 929.4 MSL to minimize flood- ing on the lake and maintain more adequate year-end lake levels; (b) limit the discharge to Minnehaha Creek to the maximum practicable extent to 250 cfs to reduce downstream flooding; (c) to provide Minnehaha Creek flow augmentation. The management objectives proposed to be accomplished are set forth in greater detail in a proposed management policy adopted by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board of Managers on November 17, 1977. 2. Gray's Bay dam site renovation. 3. A series of recreational development and channel improvement projects throughout most of the length of Minnehaha Creek. The purpose of the downstream projects is to improve the recreational and aesthetic benefits of the Creek, including: a. A canoe portage across County Road 73. b. Recreational access to Minnehaha Creek at the followin9 locations: (1) Thirty-second Street at the South end of Hillsboro Avenue in St. Louis Park. (2) The west side of the Creek between Thirty-sixth Street and Highway 7 in St. Louis Park. (3) At the intersection of Brookview Avenue and Edgebrook Drive in St. Louis Park. (4) South of the 7300 block of Oxford Street in St. Louis Park. (5) At Louisiana Avenue, west of Methodist Hospital in St. Louis Park. = (6) Utley Park in Edina between 50th Street and Minnehaha Creek west of Wooddale Avenue. c. The placing of signs along the Creek laying off creek distances in kilometers and identifying creek hazards. d. The removal of obstructions, repair of small structures and erosion prevention measures at several points along Minnehaha Creek. 4. The development of a~ nature study area along Meadowbrook Lake in St. Louis Park in the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 20, Township 28N, Range 21W as well & as the raising of the bridges over Minnehaha Creek in the Meadowbrook Golf Course area to permit canoes to pass beneath them. The total preliminary cost estimate for the pro- ject, including engineering and administration is $774,603. The petition requests that the cost of the project be assessed against all properties within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District by the levy of a tax not to exceed 1/3 mill annually for a period of not to exceed 15 years pursuant to Minn. Stat. ~ 112.61, Subd. 3. 3. Nature of the Hearing and Issues. For the Depart- ment of Natural Resources, the hearing is a contested case hearing conducted according to the contested case provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 15, Minn. Reg. HE 201-222, and Minn. Stat. ~ 105.44. At the afternoon session of the hearing the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will present evidence regarding its application to the Department of = Natural Resources for a permit for the proposed control structure. The Watershed District will also present evidence regarding the overall series of improvements as described in the preliminary engineering report. For the Department of Natural Resources the issues are: Whether the plans of the applicant are rea- sonable, practical and will adequately protect public safety and promote the public welfare. The hearing examiner will be Howard L. Kaibel, Jr., whose address and phone number are: Office of Hearing Examiner Room 300 1745 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 Telephone: (612) 296-6910 6 The above-cited procedural rules are available at the Office of Hearing Examiners or may be purchased from the Documents Section of the Department of Administration, 140 Cen- tennial Building, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55155, telephone: (612) 296-2874. They provide generally for the procedural rights of the parties including: right to be represented by legal counsel, rights to advance notice of witnesses and evi- dence, right to a prehearing conference, rights to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses, and right to purchase a record or transcript. Parties are entitled to issuance of subpoenas to compel witnesses to attend and produce docmments and other evidence. Persons wishing to intervene as parties may petition the hearing examiner in the manner provided in Minn. Reg. HE 210. Ail other persons who are affected by the proposed project will have an opportunity to testify and introduce exhibits. Persons attending the hearing should bring all evidence hearing on the case including any records or other documents. If persons have good reason for request- ing a delay of the hearing, the request must be made in writ- examiner '!at least five (5) days prior to to the hearing the hearing. A copy of the request must be served on the agency and any other parties. For the Watershed District the hearing is con- ducted according to Minn. Stat. ~ 112.48, subd. 3. The Managers desire to hear from affected landowners and governmental officials and the general public regarding the proposed im- provements. For the Watershed District the issues are: Whether the proposed improvements, as described in the petition as modified by the preliminary report of the engineer, will be conducive to the public health and promote the general welfare, are in compli- ance with the Overall Plan of the District, the provisions of Minn. Stat., Chapter 112, and whether the improvements are part of the basic Water Management Plan of the District. As to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the public hearing may be continued if necessary in order to allow all interested parties to be heard, which continuation, if any, shall ~e announced by the Managers at each preceding hearing giving the time and place of the continued public hearing. Questions about the hearing may be addressed to the hearing examiner; to Gary R. Macomber, Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman & Dory, Ltd., attorneys for the Watershed District, 4344 IDS Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55402, telephone: (612) 335- 933i; or to Special Assistant Attorney General William G. Peter- son, attorney for the Department of Natural Resources, ~375 'Centennial Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55155, tele- phone: (612) 296-3294. Dated: January _~ , 1978 GERALD D. SEINWILL, Director, Division of ~:ers~ Departmen.t ~,~"',~/'~a~ir a~e ~o u r c e s H. DALE PAL~r~ATIER, Secretary, Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distr.ict 8 123 ON LAKE IViiNNETONI'O~ IHDIAN 19URIAL. MOUNDI~ 534]. MAYWOOD RO,'AD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 January 12, 1978 Representative Tad Jude District 42A Minnesota House of Representatives State Capitol St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Dear Tad: In reply to our telephone conversation,.attached is a copy of the proposed bill to increase .~,he Fire Department pension and a copy of the resolution from the Council requesting the Legislature to adopt the act. Also enclosed is a copy of the latest actuarial study of the pension plan. The actual City expenditure turns out to be $2,500 less than the Council anticipated. Sincerely, Leofiard L. Kopp City Manager LLK/ms Encl. cc: City Council P.S.: Tad, I am sending a copy of this to Pillsbury; probably you should touch base with him. a bill for an ac% relating to the city of Mound; firemen's service pensions; amending Laws of 1976, Chapter 97, Section 1, as amended. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: Section 1. Laws 1973, Chapter 175, Section 1, as amended by Laws of 1975, Chapter 117, Section 1, as amended by Laws 1976, Chapter 97, Section 1 is amended to read: Section 1. [MOUND, CITY OF; VOLUNTEER FIREMEN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION PENSIONS.] Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary of Minnesota Statutes, Section 69.06, the Mound volunteer fire department relief association shall pay to retired firemen and newly retiring firemen qualifying with 20 years of service and having attained the age of 50, a monthly annuity not to exceed ~8 $145 per month. Payments may be made retroactive to January 1, ~9~ 1978. Sec. 2. This act is effective upon approval by the governing body of the City of Mound and upon compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021. 77-443 10-4-77 RESOLUTION NO. 77-443 A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE TO ADOPT AN ACT INCREASING THE FIREMAN'S SERVICE PENSION TO $145 WHEREAS, firemen are requesting an increase in their service pension plan from $120 a month to $145 a month, and WHEREAS, said request for increase would require Council action and a new bill by the State Legislature, and WHEREAS, said requested increase would raise the funding from the present $27,200 per year to $39,200 (or a $12,000 increase in the City's contribution) and WHEREAS, fireman are requesting an increase in their pension plan in lieu of a salary increase for the year of 1978. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: The City Council does hereby request the 1978 Minnesota Legislature to adopt an act authorizing an increase in the firemen's service pension plan to provide benefits of $145 per m~nth. Adopted by the City Council this 4th day of October, 1977. 77-443 10-4-77 NOIA%flDOSS~f M-1210 12/77 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sechion 1 2 3 4 5 'Appendix A B C A Brief Smlmary of the Census Data The Actuarial Valuation Contributions Estimated Income of Fund During 1976 The Preparation of the Report Actuarial Assumptions Summary of Plan Provisions Census Data Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 M-1210 12/77 Section 1. A Brief Summary of the Census Data The data on which this actuarial valuation is based is summarized below. Information on each member and beneficiary included in the valuation is presented, in Appendix C. Members No.t Ye.t .Rec.eivi.n.g Benefits Active Members Deferred Annuitant Members Number 36 1 Prospective Retirement Annuities $62,640 $ 1,740 Members currently Receiving Benefits Retired Members Disabled Members Widows of Deceased Members Children of Deceased Members Deferred Members Number 12 Annual Annuity Payments $20,880 --0-- --0-- --0-- --0-- -1- M-1210 12/77 Section 2. The Actuarial Valuation The results of the valuation on December below. 1. Accrued Liability 2. Special Fund Assets 3. Unfunded Accrued Liability (Prior Service Deficit) 4. Normal Cost 31, 1976 are shown $444,229 $175,878 $268,351 $ 13,584 The actuarial assumptions used in determining these results will be found in Appendix A. ~xplanation of Actuarial Terminology Accrued Liability: The present value of benefits earned for service prior to the valuation date under the actuarial method used. The actuarial method used spreads the cost of total expected benefits equally over each member's anticipated period of active membership. The dollar amount shown as the Accrued Liability represents the number of dollars that should be in the Special Fund to provide for benefits already earned. Unfunded Accrued Liability (Prior Service Deficit): This amount is the difference between the Accrued Liability (the amount that should be in the Special Fund to fully provide for benefits already earned) and the actual amount of Special.Fund assets. Normal Cost: The amount necessary, according to the actuarial method used, to pay for benefits earned in 1977 (and each future year until another actuarial valuation is completed). M-1210 12/77 Section 3. Contributions The Volunteer Firemen's Relief Association Guidelines Bill of 1971, as amended effective July 1, 1973~ specifies minimum support rates required on an annual basis. The minimum support rates from the municipality and state aid are determined as the amount required to meet the Normal Cost plus amortizing any existing prior service deficit over a 20- year period. This total contribution is shown below. The contribution required by the municipality for any year is determined by taking Item 3 below, and subtracting one year's estimated state aid expected from the state pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 69. Contribution to Amortize Unfunded Accrued Liability (Prior Service Deficit) Over 20 Years e Normal Cost Amortization Payment on Unfunded Accrued Liability (Prior Service Deficit) Total Contribution Required if made 1/1/77 (Includind State Aid) Interest at ~ to 12/31/77 Total Contribution if made 12/31/77 $13,584 20,508 $34,092 1,705 $35,797 -3- Section 4. Income of Fund During 1976 Members' Contributions City or Village Contributions --0-- 13,419 State Aid Total Contributions Investment Income Total Contributions and Income 13,782 $27,201 $ 9,218.00 $36,419.00 M-1210 12/77 Section 5. The Preparation.of the Report This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles and practices. This actuarial survey was made in accordance with our understanding of the. requirements of the Volunteer Firemen's Relief Association Guidelines Bill of 1971, as amended effective July 1, 1973. The usual care has been exercised in making the calculations and presenting the results. The contents of this report are, therefore, believed to be a correct appraisal of the state of affairs of the Plan. Respectfully submitted, HEWITT ASSOCIATES Rodger Patrick, ASA M-1210 12/77 APPENDIX A ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS Mortality Rates Withdrawal Rates Disability Rates Retirement. Age Interest Rate Actuarial Method The mortality rates used are based on the United States Life Table, 1959-61, White Males and White Females. These tables were used for active members, retired members and for survivors. The rate of withdrawal of .060 at age 20 decreasing uniformly to zero at age 45 with no withdrawal after that age. The expected Normal Cost of any short term weekly income benefits has been determined as follows, and the resulting cost has been included in the Normal Cost shown on page 2: If these benefits are insured, the 1970 annual insurance premium. If these benefits are not insured, the cost is determined using appropriate claim statistics published by the Society of Actuaries from intercompany claims experience. The assumed average retirement age is 53. Five percent compounded annually. The Entry Age Normal Cost Method has been used with the Normal Cost determined as a level amount each ~ear from the date of joining the Department to the assumed retirement age. -6- Hewitt Associates M-1210 12/77 APPENDIX B SUMMARY OF PLAN PROVISIONS Retirement Benefit Requirements Amount Vesting Benefit Requirements Amount Disability Benefit Requirements Amount Lump Sum Death Benefits Twenty years of service and 50 years of age. Benefit When Minimum Requirements Are Met: $145 per month. Twenty years of service. $145 per month, payment deferred to age 50. None. $145 per month for life. ,R,e,qui remen t s, Amount None. $1,500. widow's and Children's Death Benefit Requirements. Amount Widow Children Maximum Family Benefii -7- None. $108.75 per month. $36.25 per month to age 18 or marriage. $145 per month. APPENDIX C CENSUS DATA P ? ! 17 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACTIVE AGE ~]pl. HDAY ~6 ~0 ~0 $0 2~ 2B 75 RELIEF ASSOCIATION MEMBERS COMPLETED YE~$ OF SERVICE g ? P~OJEC1ED ANNUAL ANNUITY $1,740 ~,740 t,740 1,740 1,740 1,740 ~,740 ~'740 ~,740 ~,740 ~,T40 ~,740 ~,740 ~,740 ~,740 ~,740 1,740 1,740 ~,740 ~,740 ~,740 ~,740 ~,740 ~,740 1,740 115 CODE MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION ACTIVE MEMBERS (CONTINUED) ~GE COMPLETED PROJECTED NEAPEST YEA~S OF ANNUAL ~IRTHDAY SEPVICE ANNUITY 25 2 $1,740 75 1 1,740 25 0 1,740 ~5 0 1,740 2~ I 1,740 2Q 1 1,740 2~ 0 1,740 21 I 1,740 21 0 1,740 lq 0 ~,740 lq 0 1,740 MOUND FIRE CODE NUMBER 2 4 6 7 1,0 1,1, 1,2 CODE NUMBER DEPARTMENT RELIEF RETIRED MEMBERS 62 62 61, 58 54 54 54 53 52 52 52 51, DEFERRED.MEMBERS AGE 48 ASSOCIATION EXPECTED BENEFIT $1.,740 ~,740 1.,740 1.,740 1.,740 ~,740 1,,740 1,,740 ~,740 ~,740 ~,740 ~,740 EXPECTED BENEFIT $~,740