The URL can be used to link to this page

1977-09-06AGENDA Mound City Council September 6, 1977 City Hall 7:00 P.M. Discussion 8:00 P.M. Meeting Minutes -p.205-207 Slide Presentation - West Hennepin Human Services Board Bid Opening - Grandgiew Lynwood Storm Drainage Public Hearing on Beer License - Tom Thumb -p.64 No Parking Request -p.201-204 Cambridge Lane -p.199-200 Dock Permit Refunds -p.197-198 Request for Street Improvement -p.195~196 1978 Budget Revenue Sharing - Hearing Dates -p.194 Police Equipment & Training -p.191-193 ~11. Additional Patrolman -p.189-190 12. McAthie vs. City of Mound -p.154-159 ~13.~ Comments and Suggestions from Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) 14. Information Memorandums -p.160-188 15. Committee Reports ' 2O8 CLAYTON L. LEFEVERE HERBERT P. LEFLER CURTIS A. PEARSON J. DENNIS O'bRIEN JOHN E. D~AWZ JOHN B. DEAN DAVID J. KENNEDY GLENn E. PURDUE JAMES D.IARSON CHARLES 1. LEFEVERE HERBERT P, LEFLER TTT JEFFREY J. STRAND LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEF'LER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ I100 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 August 26, 1977 TELEPHONE (612) 333-05~3 Mr. Leonard L. Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Special Assessment Hearing and Deferred Special Assessments Dear Leonard: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter concerning the deferral of special assessments. I am unable to proceed based on the information I have to prepare this ordinance. I am not sure if the Council wishes to defer special assess- ments for assessment rolls which have. already been adopted and are on file with the county, nor am I able to ascertain if the Council has the legal authority to adopt such a pro- vision. I talked to Mary Marske about it this afternoon when I was unable to reach you and she was not sure of their intention nor was she sure as to what effect this would have on the administration of the collection of special assessments. I believe that I need to have this clarified. Since this is a new progr~ and the law is rather vague it may be necessary to obtain an Attorney General's opinion as to the authority of the Council to adopt an ordinance making it applicable to existing assessments. Essentially 'the same comments would be made about the last point in your letter, that being where people start paying assessments but if their income drops then being able to apply for deferral. Again this is a very complex question. The law is not clear on it and I do not know the answer. I also note on your comments relating to interest charges that you proposed to use an average rate. Unfortunately, I do not believe that is workable for several reasons: a) The short term bonds carry low coupons and the long term maturities which are those which will be effected by the deferment carry the higher coupons. LAW OFFICES L~FEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O' BRIEN & DRAWZ Mr. Leo'nard L. Kopp August 26, 1977 Page 2 b) The rate being suggested merely covers the interest costs and does not take into account any of the administration charges, delinquencies or other problems which may come up with the assessments. I would strongly recommend that the Council adopt a rate of at least 6% and probably 6 1/2% or 7%. It is unfortunate that this question comes up at the same time that the City ~lerk is preparing the notice for an assessment hearing on~F21st. I have made a number of revisions in that form which-I~eceived this afternoon, and am returning that so that you may give it to Mary and Marge. Chapter 429 requires that notice be given if the City ha's a deferred special assess- ment policy. We have no such policy but it appears that the Council is anticipating adopting one prior to adopting the assessments. I have tried to handle this problem by including in the notice some general wording to the effect that the Council is considering this problem. I will be out of the office next week and there is no way I will be able to have this ordinance for you until some of these points are clarified. I am sorry I missed you today so that we were unable to discuss these problems. Yours~ Curtis A. Pearson City Attorney. City of Mound CAP :nj enclosure cc Mary Marske City Clerk Mound. Minnesota Siorm Sewer ndview & Lynwood Blvd. September 6, 1977 Bid Tabulation Bid Planholder Bond Amount Comments A & K Construction 9038 ll0th St. No. Stillwater, ~innesota 55082 F.F. Jedlicki Inc. 4631 Twin Haven Rd. ~..iinnetonka, ~.~innesot a X $]8,50].00 55343 -G & L'Co~ract'ing ...... P.O. Box 340 Hopkins, Minnesota X 16,882.50 55343 Hennen Construction Route 1, Box 65A Rockford, ~innesota 55373 X 20,085.00 ~ Latour Construction Ted Latour Maple Lake, ~innesota X 15,700.75 55358 O & P Contracting Box 505 Osseo, ~,iinnesot a 55369 Sullivan Septic Inc. Sewer g.. Water Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 X ]6,967.00 Widmer Brothers Inc. P.O. Box 235 Spring Park, .~iinnesot~ X 2],000.00 55384 C~TY O~ ~OU~ ~ou~d~ ~nneso~a September 6, 1977 INFORV~TION MEMORANDUM NO. 77-165 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager Multiple Dwelling Ordinance The Council has not discussed of the present ordinance: 1. Section 23°05 Subdivisions 4 & 5 Commissaries 2o Section 23.06l Multiple B and To~nhouses 3. Section 23.052 t~u]ttp]e C Division 2 Cha' 23 - Page 8a SECTION 23.06 Multiple b4olling Use District (continued) c. Reducing Multiple Use District 1. Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision Number 168, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (ora. ~s6 - 3/~8/~) 2. Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision Number 170. (Ord. 201 - 12/16/1~65) 3. Lots 20, 21 ana 22, Auditor's Subdivision ~167 (Ord. 226 - 6/29/1967) 4- Lots 7-15, inclusive, Lots 17-27, inclusive, Lot 33 and the North 15 feet of Lot 28, Auditor's Subdivision ~o. 168. (Ord. 316 r 4/25/74) do Conforming Uses In the.Mu!tip!e ~elling Use District, unless otherwise pr9vided in this ordinance, no'building or oremises shall be used, and no building shall hereafter be erected or structurally altered except for one or more of the follo~ng uses nor shall any building be erected to a building height of' more than two and one-half stories or 35 feet. 1. All uses permitted in Sections 23.Oll and ~'o-family dwelling, aoartments and flats. (Ord. 192 - 6/?h/196~) 3- Hospitals and clinics, clu%s, fraternities and lodges, boarding'and lodging houses. (Ord. h6 - 12/h/19h~) h. An apartment or apartment complex containing 100 units or more under the same o%~nership, may upon obtaining license therefor as provided by Chapter 38, Part F of these ordinances, operate a grocery store supolying preoackaged commodities to its ~m residents, only. Pro- vided, however, the structure, or portion thereof, used for the gro- cery store shall contain a retail sales area not to exceed ~00 square feet. Provided further, the operation of such store or stores shall-' be subject to such limitation as imposed by the council as condition- ed to the issuance of the said license therefor. (Ord. 1~2 - 6/2h/ 5- The ~ Council ~ay grant a Special Use Permit for offices of persons engaged in the engineering, medical, dental, accounting or legal profession or for religious or philan%P~opic organizations. Before granting a Special Use Permit, the Council shall conduct a pdblic hearing after at least 10 days' published notice and written notice to all properties within 300 feet of the property proposed be used for an office. No Special Permit shall be granted unless the property complies with the following conditions and standards: a. There shall be at least 2,OOO square feet of floor area of office space on the ~ain floor. The maximum office space in any structure shall not exceed 6,000 square feet.· b. The lot on which the structure is located shall contain at least 40,000 square feet. c. One ~ff-street parking space shall be provided for each 200 square feet of floor area. A detailed plan with parking spaces shown shall be made a part of the permit. The parking area shall be c - 2 - 19/4 SECTION 23.06 l fltiole P elling Use District d. Conforminq Uses (continued) 5- ~con~inuea) improved in accordanc· with the standards established in Eection 25.50, Subd. (i) of this code. d. A landscaping plan shall be presented and ~ncorpo~a~ed as a a par% of %he Special ~se ?ermi% and shall provide for a minimum lO-foot setback from all parking areas to abutting property lines and shall provide that on the 10-foot setback shrubbery will be plan%ed and maintained by the occupant of 'the property. The landscaping plan shall show t]~t at least' 30~/~ of ~he land area will be maintained in open space con- sisting of greenery and. shrubbery and.will not be used for %nj!ding, parking or accessory purposes. e. Ail offices in this use district shall abide by the terms of %he special permit to limit truck 'deliveries to.the hours of 8:00 'a.m. to 5:00 p.m. each day. f. No outside storage shall be allowed on the premises without the specific consent of the ~iA.~e Council as stated in the" permit. ~ g. Illuminated flashing signs are prohibited.' No sign shall be erected which has more than ~ square feet of total area including both sides of the s~gn if a message is contained on both sides, and the sign shall not extend on to any public right-of-way. No sign shall exceed 8 height of 5'feet from the ground level where the sign is located. h. Lighting of any parking area shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of light visible from a public right-of-way or from adjacent properties. i. Prior to occupancy of the structure, approval Shall be obtained from the Fire ~hief or his desiD~ated inspector and from {he Building Inspector, showing compliance with all~ ord~- nantes and codes. ~. The Council may require a traffic circulation plan or the location or relocation of driveways to the property to promote traffic circulation and the health, safety, and general wel- fare of the community. k. The Council may impose such other conditions and safeguards in the permit as are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare.' (Ord. 313 - 1-3-74) c - 2 - 1 )74 Division 2 ChapLet 23 - Page SECTI 23.061 Multiple Dwelling Use District "B" a. Crea+~{on Mulk{ple Dwelling Use I]istric% as established in S~ction 23.O1 and as shown on said "Zoning Map of Mound, Minnesota" is .' amended by adding thereto Multiple Ik~ellin9 Use Disbricb b. Expandins Multiple DwellinD Use Dishrich "B" by addin~ %hereto: 1. Lots ~-13, inclusive, Block 3~ Shirley Hills~ Unit D. - 1/l /6l) 2. Lots ~-38, inclusive, Block ll, Sebon. (Ord. l~l - 1/31/63) 3- Lots 6:?,8, Block l~ Seton Addition and Lots 1-% inclusive, Block 2, Seton AdditiOn. (Ord. 231 - 11/2/1967) ~. Lot 1% Subdivision of Lots i & 32 Skarp & Lindquist's Ravens- wood, and vacated £ire lane. (Ord. 274 - 11/19/1970) 5- Lots 1 and 36, Block 15, Arden. (ord. 335 - 5/15/1975) c. ReducingMultipleDwellin9 Use District "B" Conformin~ Uses In the Multiple Dwelling Use District "B", unless otherwise provided in this ordinance, no building shall be erected to a building height of more than two stories or 28 feet nor shall any bullring have less than 30 feet nor more than 60 feet front yard set t~ck; nor shall there be less than %,000 squ~re feet of lot area per family dwel~l~ng unit; nor shall any building be used or hereafter erected or struct~ urally altered except for one or more of the following uses: 1. All uses oermitted in Sections 23.011 and 23.05. 2. Two-family dwel]~ngs, apartme~nts and flats. (Ord. 112 - 12/12/.~ 3. Towr~houses ma~_b.e permitted upon securing a Soecial Use Permit from the ~ Council upon reco~nendation of the Planning Co~ission and subject to the following standards: (aa) Townhouses are defined as a single structure consisting of not less than three or more th~n six dwelling units having the first story at the ground level, with no other dw~11in~ or portions of other dwellings directly above or below, with each dwelling unit connected to the other dwelling by a Single party wall with no opening. E~ch dwelling unit shall have a .front and rear entrance. (bb) Townhouses shall not exceed two stories in hei. ght. ,113 SECTION 23.~~1 Multiple })-'ellip.~ Use District "B" continued d. Conformiru~ 7sen ~tinued) 5- Tovnh0uaes (continued) (cc) The required land area for each to~,n~house unit shall be: 5 ~uuits - 5000 square feet of ]and per unit. 4 units - 4500 square feet of land per unit. 5 units - 4~00 square feet of land per unit.. (dd) The minimum reqAtred floor area per towrfhouse unit shall be as follows: .. 1½ Sto~ i Bed_room 2 Bedroom 3 Bedmoom Each Add' 1 Bedroom All townhouses shall have at lea~t erie bedroom. 760 sq..~t, above grade 89) sq. f~o ~bove grade ~60. sq. ft. ab~e g-=age ft.) 2 Story_' 600' sq. ft. per floor 690 sq. ft. ~erfI~r ~ sq. ft. per floor (ee) Townhouses shall have the following required setbacks and off street parking: - Front yard - 25 feet - the structure may project 2 feet into'front yard above first floor ceiling level. Side yard - at least 15 feet on each side of the hain structUre.. Rear yard - at least 20 feet. - Off ~treet parking - t, at least one of ~hich shall be indoors. If the indoor parkiug is a part of the main structure and is set back at least 25 feet, and has an individual driveway for each unit,' one off street parking sp~.ce may be ~redtted for the portion of the driveway ~hich shall be set ~ack at least 5 feet from the lrablic right of ~ay. No individual drive~ay shall be any closer thaB 2 fee% from another individual drive'~ay. Any off street ~arking located other than ~ithin the front yard' a~ea' describe~ above ,and sezn(.f/lg . more than one dwelling unit shall 'not be located closer than !0 feet' .from the principal structure. '- c - I - 1969 23-O61 ~ult~ D~elling Use Distr~ct "B" Confo in Uses (continueR) To~OUSe~ ~continued) (fl) Specific site. plans, dra~ td scale, showt~ buil~ size location and pla~ showi~ the in,vidal ~its shall be req~red. A site plan shall be filed with the co--il show~ off-street pa~- ~ng, ~iveways, ~slls, f~ces, patios, all set-~ks ~d the land- soaping of all open areas ~ith ~as., sheba or other acceptable wa ti0n 0r gene l uoed In ~ndscap~g. All plans shall be reviewed by-the Co,oil and filed with the ~ an~ Shall become a part of the ~pecfal pe~t... (gg) No more than one townhouse shall be located on an~ one platted lot,. if more ~than one platted lot is used £or said construction the ,owner shall be r~quired to replat said lots in accordance with Chap- '~er 22 of the ~ Code~ The Council may waive said replatting requirements upon recommendation of the Planning Commission and' upon receipt of .a signed statement from the owner~'combining said lots ~nto one buildable parcel, said combination to be filed with the County Auditor and taxed as one parcel. ' (hh) Individual. townhouse units may ~e conveyed or ownership trans-. ferred .if copies of articles of incorporatio,~A_.association by-laws,~ or other covenants are pr.e~ented to the ~ Council and maid docum.ents setting forth conditions for transfer are approved by the ~ Council. Such approval shall not be given until the afore- raid documents shall be £iled with the Register. of Deeds or ~he Reg-' ~strar of Titles And all future owners of t.°~n~ou~ea or units in the individual townhouse shall be bound by the conditions and Covenants set forth ~n said documents. A certified copy of the documents filed with the ~Regi.~.ter of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles shall be filed with the ~ Clerk. (Ord. 252'- 7/17/1~6p) . c - 1 - 969 Division 2 Chapter 23 - Page l0 SECTION 23.062 Mo_ltiple Dwe]]in~ Use District "C" a. Creation Ordinance No. 162 - 12/12/1963 b. Expanding Multiple Dwelling Use District "C' by adding thereto: 1. Lot~ $ %o 13, inclu~ive, Phelp~ Island Park, l~t Division and Lot 77 and that part of Lot "B" lying SWly of the ~Ely llne of Lot 5 in Phelp~s Island Park, let Division if extended to the hWly line of said Lot "B" 1st Rearrangement of Phelp's Island Park, 1st Division. 2. Lot Seventy-four (74~) in the First Rearrangement of Phelp's Island Park, First Division according to the pleat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Henne- pin County. ~.lso the following tract of land in Section Nineteen (19) Township One Hundred Seventeen (]-17) North Range Twenty-three (23) West described as fo]lows, to-wit: Commencing at the extreme Easter]~v corner of Lot Number Seventy-four (74) in the plat of the First Re- arrangement of Phelp's Island Par~, First Division according to the plat on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds, Hennepin Co~mty, Minnesota thence Westerly along the Southerly line of said lot 99.6 feet to the County Road as laid out and travelled; thence Southwesterly along the Southerly side of ss-id road 251 feet; thence Southeasterly 168.3 feet to a point on the Westerly side of the -1]ey in the plat of Phelp's Island Park First Division which point is 292.5 feet Southwesterly from the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly alo~ the ,esteriy side of said alley 292.5 feet to the place of beginning. 3. Auditor's Subdi~-ision Number 136. (Ord. 162 - 12/12/63) Lot 9, Kohman's Addition to Mound, and The West 250 feet of Block 5, Shirley Hills, Unit A. 189 - 4/22/1965) 0rd. Lots 5-13, inclusive, Phelp's Island Park First Division, and Lot 77 and that oart of Lot "B" lying Southwesterly of the Northeasterly line of Lot ~ all in Phelo's Island Park First Division, as extended to the Northwesterly line of said Lot "B" First Rearrsngement of Phelp's Island Park First Divisio~ together ~lth the private streets and alleys contahed therei~ ~nd ~djacent thereto. (Ord. 190 - 4/29/1965) c. Reducing Multiple I~,elling Use District "C" O - 1 - 19?l S!~CTION pie D~ellfn~_Use District Chapter 25 - Tage 10 a (continued) Confo~mtn~ ~n the ~.~ttiple ~elling Use District "C", unless otherwise proviaea in this ordihance, no building or premises shall be useR,.and no building shall be hereafter erected or str~cturall~ altere~ except for one o~ more of %he following uses: 1. An~ use pez~itted in Section 23°06- ~. T~o-family dwellings, apartment ~uilSings, mul%{Ple & elliugs, and any group or row houses. 3- Boarding and lodging houses, fraternities and lodges. 4- ~ospitals. (Ora. 142 - 4/24/1962)' 5- Townhouses, as defined in Section 23.061 Sub-Section d (5) and sub- ject to the standards contained in said section, may be permitted upon securing a Special ~se Permit from the Village Council u~on . recommendation of the Planning Commission. (Ord..252 - 7/17/1~69) 6. Special pe'rmit may be granted in accordance with terms and procedures set forth in Section 23.06, Subsection d, Subdivision 5 of the zoning code, (Ord. 515 - 1-3-74) C - '2 -.1974 142 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL August 23~ 1977 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof~ a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound~ tiennepin County~ Minnesota was held at 5341 ~{aywood Road in said City on August 23~ 1977 at 7:30 p.m. Those present were: Mayor Tim Lovaasen~ Councilmembers Orval Fenstad~ Gordon Swenson~ Robert Polston and Benjamin Withhart. Also present were City Manager Leonard L. Kopp and City Clerk Mary H. Marske. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting of August 16~ 1977 were presented for con- sideration. Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion to accept the minutes of the meeting of August 16~ 1977 as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor~ so carried and accepted. PUBLIC HEARING - BEER LICENSE - MOUND LANES The City Clerk presented an affidavit of publication in the official newspaper of the notice of public hearing on said Beer License. Said affidavit was then examined~ approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened the meeting for public input on the Beer License and per- sons present to do so were afforded the opportunity to express their views thereon. No persons present offered objections and the Mayor then closed the public hearing. Lovaasen moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-381 RESOLUTION GRANTING A 3.2 NON-INTOXICATING BEER LICENSE TO THE OWNER OF THE MOUND LANES. The vote was unanimously in favor. BIDS - SKYLIGHT REPAIR The Council considered bids received in regard to the repair of the skylight on the City Office building. Fenstad moved and Withhart seconded a motion to reject all bids and authorize the architect Williams/O'Brien and Central Roofing Company to complete Proposal A-1 and Proposal B at no cost to the City. The vote was unanimously in favor. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION St~n Variance - Westonka Villa Apartments Polston moved and Swenson~seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-382 RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF Pk~CEb~NT OF SIGN AT WESTONKAVILLkAPARTMENTS AND GRANTING NECESSARY VARIANCE The vote was unanimously in favor. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT Mrs. Janet Gellman asked some detail about the skylight problem and possible reasons for the problems. Ruth Wyman~ reporter for The Laker asked for clarification of time off City meetings. SPECIAL ASSESSb~NT HEARINGS Fenstad moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-383 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE CALLED REGARDING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS TO BE LEVIED FOR THE YEAR OF 1977 ON SEPTEM- BER 21~ 1977 AT ~:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. ~/~ The City Council will be meeting with the Spring Park Council on September !2~ !977. 143 TUXEDO EASEMENT Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-384 P~SOLUTION AUTHORIZING OBTAINING OF RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT OF LOTS 1 AND 27, BLOCK 5, ARDEN IN Tile ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $350.00 FOR TREE REMOVAL AS ORIGINALLY 'APPROVED BY RESOLUTION 77-284 FOR TUXEDO BOULEVARD The vote was unanimously in favor. LICENSES - CIGARETTE AND OFF SALE BEER Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-385 P~SOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE CALLING OF A PUBLIG HEARING FOR AN OFF-SALE BEER LICENSE FOR PETER WARD~ dba .i'TOPLTHUI~B SUPERETTE FOR SEPTEM-- BER 6~ 1977 AT 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Fenstad moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-386 RESOLUTION GRANTING A LICENSE. FORTTHE SATm OF CIGARETTESTO PETER WARD dba TOM THUMB SUPERETTE. The vote was unanimously in favor. ASSESSING CLERK The Council considered a memo from the City Clerk regarding the establishment of the position of Assessing Clerk and changing the classification of Clerk- Typist Deloris Schwalbe to Assessing Cl~r~k. Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion P~SOLUTION 77-387 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POSTION OF ASSESSING CLERK AT A SALARY OF $750.00 PER MONTH EFFECT- IVE SEPTEMBER 1~ 1977. The vote was unanimously in favor. MISDEMEANOR PENALTY INCREASE The Council considered a memo from the Prosecuting Attorney regarding the increase in maximum fines for misdemeanors from $300 to $500. Wit,%art moved and Swenson seconded a motion to ordain the following amendment as Ordinance 367 ORDINANCE NO. 367 ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 71.099 OF THE CITY CODE P~LATING TO INCREASING THE PENALTY PROVISIONS FOR CO1,R4ITTING A MISDEMEANOR: ~ND REP~LING SECTION 70.01 OF THE CITY CODE The City oflMound does ordain: Section 71.09 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: Section 71.09 Penalties. a. Any person who commits a misdemeanor and violates the pro- visions of any ordinance of the City of Mound~ shall be guilty of a misdemeanor~ and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not more than $500. and by imprison- ment for not more than ninety (90) days~ or both. b. The provisions of this ordinance increasing the maximum fine for a misdemeanor to $500 and permitting fine and imprison- ment for not ~nore than ninety (90) days are pursuant to and consistent with the provisions of Chapter 355 of the Laws of 1977 of the State of Minnesota. 144 Section 70.01 of the City Code is inconsistent with Section 71.09 and is hereby repealed. The vote was unanimously in favor~ so ordained.~ TP~gqSFER OF FUNDS Fenstad moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-388 P~E$OLUTION AUTHORIZING TIlE TRANSFER OF CERTAIN CITY FUNDS. The vote was unanimously in favor. PAY~fENT OF BILLS Swanson moved and Withhart seconded a motion to approve payment of the bills as presented on the prelist in the amount of $23~917.35 where funds are avail- able. The vote was unanimously in favor. INFORMATION MEMORANDUMS Withhart moved and Swanson seconded a motion to form a sub-committee to establish an employment policy to include job descriptions and benefits. The motion carried with Fenstad and Lovaasen voting nay. Due to the pressure of budget time the matter will be placed on the agenda at the end of October. COUNCIL ~fEMORANDUM 77-267 TONKAWOOD EAST Swanson moved and Withhart seconded a motion PdgSOLUTION 77-389 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE CALLING OF A PUBLIC HEAP, lNG REGARDING TIlE PROPOSED STREET IMJ?ROVE- I'~.NTS FOR TONKAWOOD EAST FOR SEPTEMBER 27~. 1977 AT 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. ADJOURNmeNT Fenstad moved and Polston seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting., ,The vote was unanimously in favor~ so carried and adjourned. Mary H. Marske~ City Clerk/Treasurer Leonard L.Kopp~ City Manager ON LAKE MINN~TONKA 5341 MAYWOOO ROM3 ~ MOUN{~, MINNESOTA 5S364 INDIAN BURIAL. MOUNDI ADDRr~I~ RI:I~L.Y TO A~gust 23, 1977 TO: FR OM: SUBJECT: Mr. Kopp Public Works Office No Parking Request The Public Works Department removed the No Parking signs from the north siSe of A18er Rea8 because they were not covered by the City ordinance. Since they were remove8 a letter was received from the School Dist. to have the signs reinstalleS, the letter was also signed by some residents of that area. This request is recommende~ by this office. We woul8 like to also request for the second time, that the south siSe of Al~er Road be poste8 No Parking as well. Between the church people parking half on and half off of this street sn~ all the athletic events that take place, this two lane street is reduced to about one lane. The chL~rch has sufficient parking in the rear for services plus the curb portion in front. The request would be for, No Parking on the north siSe of A18er Road from Bellaire Lane, east 200 feet to the church driveway. No Parking on the south si~e of Alder Road from Bellaire Lane, east 433 feet to Co. Rd. #110. Map .attacheS. This request if granted will slso allow the School an~ the City to clean up an~ maintain the shoulSer on the south si~e of A18er Road. Respectfully, Robert A. Miner Public Wo~ks Director RAM/Jcn .... GRAND'VIEW ~; ~- ELM ROAD 63 62 Gl 60 J, ,54 55- 56 ~ INDEPENDENT DONALD BRANDENBURG ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SCHOOL DISTRICT 56CO LYNWOOD BOULEVARD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 DR. DALE FISHER SUPERINTENDENT August 10, 1977 NO. 277 DR. WAYNE SMITH INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES Bob Minor Public Works Department City of Mound 4845 Manchester Rd. Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Bob: 0nbehalf of the School District administration and citizens that live on Alder Road, would you please accept this as a request to erect sufficient no parking signs on Alder to prevent parking on the north side of the street from the intersection of Alder and Bellaire to the front of the churchwhere the street widens and on the south side from the school parking lot entrance to a point 10 feet or so east of the fire hydrant. The paving on this street is as narrow as 22 feet until it widens in front of the church. No parking as describedwill greatly facilitate the large bus entry and exit from the parking lot on daily basis during the school year and particularly will avoid undue congestion at football games where as many as a dozen rooter and team buses use the parking lot. It really becomes a one lane street when parking on only one side is permitted and we need the entire roadway at the lot exit with the big buses. On the south side and east of the hydrant I see no reason to restrict parking, or in front of the churchwhere an extra lane exists. The neighbors on the north side already suffer the harrassment of heart traffic into and out of our parking lot when school is in session. Parked cars in front of their pro- perties adds to ~e congestion. Apparently no parking on the north side did exist for many years and signs were removed- only this past summer. " ~e district and neighboring patrons respectfully request that you do what is necessary to restore the no parking, as described in this letter, prior to the opening of school on August 29. 4); ~. -Brandenburg, Director' of: ~nistrative Services TELEPHONE 612~472-1691 O L?,.= L L ° o1~ 1411ffK'ca~ 'L't Ottl:lO0 ON I-Al~ MINN~ONKA 534~ MAYW000 ROAD lV~)UND. MINNE~OT& 553~4 INDIAN BURIAl. MOUNDII ADDREII RIEI~I.Y TO August 30, 1977 TO- FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Kopp Public Works Office Cambridge Lane We are requesting that the Cambridge road closing and proposed new home driveway area be treated the same as on Jennings Road. Both streets require that a portion of the closed streets be used by the abutting property owners for easy access to their driveway and park- ing areas. The individual on Cambridge Lane is putting in his own wooden wall to retain our dirt fill. The wall is partly on the closed right of way. The Gity will afford drainage behind this wall for water from Cambridge Lane. We will rake and seed the closed portion behind this wall and put in a walkway for the public to use. This should not cause any inconvenience for the public or the city. Respectfully, Rob err A. Miner Public Works ~irector P~M/jcn ON L.A),~I; MINNE"rONKA INDIAN BURiAl. HOUNDS 5341 MAYW00D ROAD ;.'~'"q";~ R~"PLY TO MOUND, MINNESOTA 5,~364 August 29, 1977 TO: FROM: S~JECT: Mr. Kopp Dock Inspector Refunds of Dock Application The following people have applied for dock permits and were not issued dock permit because all areas were filled. RECEIp,~S' ~, NAME ADDRESS AMOUNT 11006 Daniel Hoese 4629 Hanover Rd. 12.00 11005 Ken Hoffmann 4613 Hanover Rd. 12.00 11004 Ernest Morgan 4387 Wilshire Blvd. 10.00 ll003 Elliot 01son 4601 Tuxedo Blvd 12.00 ll000 Paul Axt 6046 Ridgewood R~. 10.00 10997 Charles Whitman 3013 Brighton Blvd. 12.00 10987 Robert Brothers 5511 Spruce Rd. 12.00 10967 Ray Grover P.O. Box 81 12.00 10964 Mike Frankie 1599 Gull Lane 12.00 10951 Warren Shaffer 3106 Priest Lane 12.00 10887 Glen Smith 2166 Overland Ln. 12.00 10877 Dean Haynes 5229 Waterbury Rd. 10.00 10859 Jamie Mittlestadt 3017 Longfellow Ln. 12.00 10855 Terry Wulf 2600 Ruby Lane 12.00 1504 Marvin Wilson 2901 Hazelwood Ln. 10.00 1406 Charles B. Hanson 2332 Driftwood Ln. 10.00 '4000 Robert Carlson 2991 Brighton Blvd. 10.00 Respectfully, Don Rotber Dock Inspector DR/jcn PETITION TO: The Hono=able Ci~ty Council of ~iound: CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Sept. 2, 1977 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 275 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Council Members City Manager 1978 Budget - Revenue Sharing Hearing Another hearing on the use of Revenue Sharing money and its relation- ship to the entire budget must be held after a ten day published not- ice. Inasmuch as the budget levy must be submitted to the County by October 10th it is suggested the budget hearing be established for October 4th of~ if the Council prefers, it could be held on September 27th along with the Street Construction Hearings. LLK/dd ON I,-~KE MINNETONKA INDIAN EIURIAI. MOUNDS 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 TELEPHONE (612) 472-1155 August 30, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp - City Manager Charles Johnson - Chief of Police Purchase order request Attached are purchase orders for travel and training for Sgt. Roy and myself. Neither of these items were budgeted in 1977, however if receipts into the General Fund via the police department are considered, they more than offset the unbudgeted amount. Refunds will be at least $4,800 from tke Minnesota Police Officers Training Board and approximately $9,800 from Federal Civil Defense funding. Respectfully, Cha rlgs~ Johns on Chief of Police CJ:lao ON EkKE MINNETONKA 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 INDIAN BURIAL MOUNDli TELEPHONE (612) 472-1155 August 30, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp - City Manager Charles Johnson - Chief of Police Purchase of office equipment Attached are purchase order numbers 6082 thru 6087. Purchase order 6082 for two chairs totalling $239.40. PO 6083 is for one bookcase total $131.47. PO 6084 for a file cabinet total $159. ll, PO 6085 is for one desk total $Z09.46, PO 6086 is for one desk total $209.46. All of these items will receive a 50% matching contribution from Civil Defense Funding. According to Mr. Corky Stevenson of Hennepin County Emergency Preparedness, if the se items are ordered s.eperately and no single item exceeds $250, the matching funds will be allocated from its P & A allotments and no special project grant is necessary. The total of these purchase orders is $948.90 of x~aiCh $474.45 would be federally funded. Purchase order 6087 is for office furniture totalling $1626.54 . It is requested this amount be charged to the administrative budget. File cabinets which are on this order will be utilized in the police department and will replace horizontal cabinets which will in turn be utilized by administration. All of these items are to be ordered from Business Furniture, Inc. which received Hennepin County bid for office furniture. All of the prices listed concur with the Hennepin County bid price. Respectfully, Charles Johnson Chief of Police CJ:lao CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Sept. 2,1977 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 77 - 274 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: City Manager SUBJECT: Additional Patrolman Attached is a copy of a letter from the Police Chief requesting the establishment of an additional patrolman position, on September 12th. The request for the additional patrolman appears in the 1978 budget. From Chief 'Johnson's budget request, the additional patrolman is a workable suggestion. It is recommended that the additional patrolman be authorized. LLK/dd enc: ON I.AKJE: MINNETONKA 5341 MAYWOOD RO/AD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 INDIAN BURIAl. MOUND~ TELEPHONE (612) 472-1155 September 1, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp - City Manager Charles Johnson - Chief of Police Steven Grand - Promotion to Patrolman It is requested GSO Steven Grand be promoted to patrolman effective 9-12-77. This will allow for his attendance at the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Basic Police School scheduled to start 9-lZ-77. The additional salary costs for 1977 will be approximately $150 per month including all PFRA and benefit increases. This cost is more than offset by receipt from the State Training Board funds of at least $1,200 per officer in attendance. Respectfully, Charles 3;oqzlns on · Chief of Police Mound Police Dept. CJ:lao ON LAKE: MINN]EL'rONKA INDIAN BURIAl. MOUNDI 5341 MAYWOOO ROAD ADDRE$1i RIEPI..Y TO MOUND, MIHNE~DTA 55~3~4 August 30, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Kopp Public Works Office Parking for Avalon Park Not having a formal plan for the developement of Avalon Park iS is difficult to give any details on the requested parking area. According to our maps we have about 85 feet of frontage on Islandview Drive, this will accommodate from eight to ten p~rking spots. The Sewer Dept. will require a driveway and gate access to the lift stat%on and wet well for routine and emergency sewer service, this can be a chain or cable access that can be kept locked. We will work with the City Planner on this developement and do the construction when the plan is accepted. Respectfully, Rob err A. Miner Public Works Director RAM/j cn 006~ ~Otd~ 'x OOg91~ OSL9 OOl~ gZ~L 091~ 09i~ "-., §LZL i/ OS( ? , q OtZ*T'/ o . ~: 000 t '?. CONSULTING £NGINEERS !~1 LAND SURVEYORS ia SITE ~~ August 29, 1977 }~r. Daryl Hicks Buffalo Bituminous P.O. Box 126 Buffalo, MN 55313 Subject: Mound Streets Dear Mr. Hicks: The two street projects which you have with the City of Mound are still incomplete. .The remaining work on the Shirley Hills project is listed below. Lower two driveways. Replace two concrete aprons. Repair sod on storm sewer easement. It has just come to our attention that there are four gate valves which were not raised to final grade on the project. I met with George McAlpine at the site about two weeks ago to go over these items. At that time I was told the work would be done within two weeks. The cracked curb still has not been repaired on the 3 Points project. As you know, we allowed PCI to attempt to repair these with an epoxy mix. This repair was not satisfactory and at a meeting earlier this summer with George and PCI, it was agreed that some sections of curb and gutt.er would be removed and replaced in order to finish the project. The City is most anxious to have these two projects completed. The 3 Points project in particular is now over two years old. Would you give me your schedule for completing these projects in the next couple of days. If a satisfactory schedule cannot be worked out for the 3 Points curb repair, the City will have the repairs done and deduct the cost from your retainage. Very truly yours, LS:sw McCO}IBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. LylJ~ Swanson, P.E. Leonard Kopp 12805 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-3700 22 NORTH MAIN STREET, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE (612) 879-8029 SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING DIVISION, MARSHALL, MINNESOTA 56258 TELEPHONE (507) 532-5820 Telephone (612) 425-4515 8736 Zachary Lane Osseo, Minnesota 55369 December 9, 1976 Mr. Lyle Swanson McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc. 12805 Olson Memorial Highway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 Dear Mr. Swanson: Regarding our telephone conversation this afternoon, with this letter we guarantee that we will make nec- essary repairs to the curb and gutter placed by Progressive Contractors, Inc. for the Schmidt Construction Company in Mound, Minnesota. The method of repair is to be determined prior'to when the work is to be accomplished in the spring of 1977. Sincerely, ........ · MSM/pjb O%\ ON LAKI~ MINNE"TONKA INDIAN BURIAl., MOUNDI 5341 k~YWOOD ROAD ADDRI. II R~Y TO ~, MINNE~TA August 23, 1977 FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Kopp Public Works Office Docks on City Commons The following suggestion by the Public Works Office may appear to be a bit severe, however, it is the opinien of the Public Works Director, the Parks Forman and the Dock Inspector that it will serve as a one season inconveni6nce only. It is estimated that more than eighty percent of all docks that are located on City Commons, are not even close to our ordinance a~.!t was intended. Few if any docks are physically located where the markers are, this alone is the one area we can not correct without the removal of all docks, that are removable. Some of the responsibility lies with the previous dock inspector, and some with the permit holders. In some areas we are suggesting fewer docks, as some areas have docks too close together to allow the permit holder to use both sides of the dock. In all but a very few cases the aliEnment of the docks to one another is so bad that some docks can not be used by the people who paid for the permit. We are urgently requesting the Park Commi'ss~ion and the Council approval of a letter being sent to those permit holders of docks that are removable, no~ piers or structures other than the common tyoe dock, that is in some cases removed yearly because of ice damage. We now have a dock inspector that is totally involved with the docks and the enforcement of our ordinance. With a properly supervised system of docks installation and alignment this request should not have to be repeated at any future time. The suggested policy for the dock inspector would be to physically locate each and every dock marker with the permit holder and indicate the dock center and termination point in the water. This would eliminate any error on the permit holders part as far as alignment or location in re]stfon to other adjoining docks. When the dock construction is complete8 ~he permit holder will c~ll for an inspect- ion and the inspector will, if the dock meets the minimum require- ments of the ordinance personally attach the metal permit tag on the dock' indicating that it is inspected and is now ready for the permit holders use. With Council permission we will make ~p a form letter indicating a dead line removal date, such as April l~, 1978 and mail ~o all permit holders giving a short explanation of why we are following this procedure and the penalty for non-complience, 'this would be the same as for non-complience with any other part of the ordinance. Respectfully, Robert A. Miner Public Works Director RAM/jcn ON LAKE: MINNETONKA 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 553&4 INDIAN BURIAl,. MOUNDI ADDRI~B RIrpI. Y TO August 17, 1977 FROM: SUBJECT: Bob Miner Don Rotber Dock Inspections After making a complete inspection of all docks located on city commons, I have found many docks that do not conform to the city ordinance. Very few are located on centers of markers. Many are off markers 6 to 8 feet causing hardship on the next dock over. Probably 50 percent do not conform to ordinance in construction; 5ock width, board spacing, post height. I would suggest that 'all docks be remove5 this year and before being issued a permit for 1978 each dock would be inspected by me. Any dock not Conforming to our ordinance would not be issued a permit until it does. This would cause an inconvenience for this one year only. Respectfully, Don Rother Dock Inspector DR/~cn Ill CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Au§ust ~3, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Robert Miner, Public Works Director Chris Bollis, Park Dept. Docks on Commons After looking over the dock situation with the Dock Inspector, I came to the conclusion that the only way to correct the problem of misplacement and illegal docks is to have all permit holders remove their docks completely from public property this Fell. That way, when permits are issued ~n the Spring, we can physically relocate each dock in its proper s~t and insure that it meets all require- ments of the Chris Bollis Park Dept. CB/dd ON LAKE MINNETONKA 534,1 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 August 10, 1977 INDIAN BURIAl. MOUNDIi x,/ TELEPHONE (612) 472-1155 ~r TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp - City Manager Charles Johnson - Chief of Police 1978 Budget Proposal Attached is the proposed police department budget for 1978. Each category was carefully analyzed and all cost estimates have been kept to a minimum, yet sufficient to allow for a comprehensive and efficient use of departmental personnel and re- sources. I have altered the Community Service Officer program somewhat in that it wili allow for maximum utilization of manpower. It has been altered in that Community Service Officers will now be obtained by affording much needed opportunities to criminal justice students for internships thru the Urban Corp program. Overall police service and crime prevention efforts will improve noticably and an acceptable level of service will be provided by the addition of three additional sworn personnel. The three sworn personnel will be made up of promotion of the permanent Community Service Officers to the rank of patrolman and the addition of one new patrolman. The problem of animal control should remain efficient and will continue to develop by charging one person with the responsibility of this function on an ongoing basis. This person will be obtained thru the utilization of the CETA program. The Mound share of the police budget is in fact considerably lower than as stated on the attached budget request. Funding for Civil Defense payable to the city in the amount of $22,365 has been requested. This funding will offset the police budget. The Mound share of the budget is indicated to be $240,584.00. However after deduction of the federal funding the amount is reduced to $218,219.00 which reflects a net increase in the cost of police service for the city of Mound in 1978 of approximately 1%. Respectful~submitted, Charle~ohnson Chief of Police CJ:lao SALARIES $265,150.00 This figure represents the total for all police department personnel both sworn and civilian. This allows for one Chief of Police, 3 sergeants, 10 patrolmen, 1 investigator, 1 Juvenile officer, one police secretary, 1 police clerk-typist, and 1 animal warden. Funding for two CSO interns is included in the miscellaneous category as they would be temporary personnel sponsored by the Urban Corp. The clerk-typist position and animal warden positions are funded totally by the CETA program. These totals reflect a gain of three sworn police officers although reflects a gain of just one paid position and the upgrading of the permanent CSOs to mworn officers. This allows for much needed improvements in patrol availability to answer calls for police service. This increase mhould vastly improve response time and availability by allowing sufficient manpower for at least two officers daily and a supervisor on duty not less than 16 hours per day. This figure represents an estimated increase of 7% in salaries for 1978. Allowance was also made for estimated overtime of 4% which would be utilized largely for court appearances which by contract are to be paid overtime. The salary range for patrolmen for 1978 is estimated to be $1,012 per month for starting patrolmen to $1,461 for a top grade patrolman. The investigator and juvenile officer each receive an additional $50 per month by contract. Sergeants are not covered by the union contract as they withdrew voluntarily in 1976. Presently sergeants receive a range of $100 per month to.~$150 per month over top grade patrolmen. $100 per month initially, $125 at 13 months, and $150 at the 25th month. Additional benefits for the sergeants are the same as public works employees. The salary range for sergeants is recommended to be $1,561 per month to $1,611 per month for 1978 with benefits to be not less than those received by other departmental personnel or other city employees. It is further recommended that the sergeant receive overtime pay at a rate of 1~ times the hourly rate for court appearances and scheduled overtime. Overtime would not be paid for on scheduled overtime required at the start or finish of regularly assigned shifts. It is recommended that the police secretary receive $850 per month for 1978 together with all benefits afforded other clerical personnel within the city~ The police clerk-typist and the animal warden positions are funded totally under the CETA program which reimburses the city for wages and benefits. The recommended salary range for police clerk is $700 to $800 per month. $700 to start with a $50 increase the seventh month and $50 the 19th m6nth of service and benefits commensurate with other city clerical personnel. The animal wardens salary range is recommended to be $750 to $950 per month. $750 to start with $50 increases the 7th, 13th, 25th, and 36th months. Benefits for this position should also be commensurate with those for other city employees. It is requested my salary be comparable with other area chiefs. To arrive at a suggested salary I obtained the 1977 salary for the following departments. 1. South Lake Minnetonka Police Department - $ ~108.33 per month 2. Orono Police Department - $1,708.33 per month 3. Hopkins Police Department - $2,000.00 per month 4. Eden Prairie Police Department - $2,203.50 per month 5. Plymouth Police Department - $2,016.66 per month The average of these 1977 salaries for the Chiefs of Police of the aforementioned departments is $2,00?.36 per month. 1978 salary schedules for these individuals is not available at this time. Based on this information it is requested that my salary for 1978 be the approximate average of the aforementioned salaries or $2,000 per month, to include benefits commensurate with other city and departmental personnel° PROFESSIONAL $300.00 This is estimated cost of required psychological evaluations required for new personnel and a contingency for other medical or professional services such as polygraph ex~a~inations which may be necessary. POSTAGE $250.Q0 Estimated cost of routine mailings amd package delivery. e PRINTING/PUBLICATION $150.00 'Estimated cost of inventory maintenance for required departmental forms. 5. UTILITIES $5,960.00 The police department utilizes approximately 25% of the city hall. This figure represents a 25% share of the gas and electric used by the city hall and additionally covers estimated costs for required telephone service for the police department. TRAVEL/CONVENTIONS/SCHOOLS $2,760.00 An ongoing.basic, in service, and continuing education is foremost pre- requisite for the continued development of departmental personnel. This cost reflects estimated expenses for department utilization of state and federal schools and seminars. This cost is more than off-set by reimburse- ments available to the department thru various state and federal training fund allocations. Estimated refund receipts for 1978 is $5,000 which would entirely off-set travel and subsistence expenses and in addition a sizable portion of salaries while personnel are attending training. EQUIPMENT REPAIR $3,50O.OO Implementation of a policy of comprehensive scheduled preventive maintenance on all departmental vehicles is included in this figure. The cost is a decrease from 1977. It is believed proper preventive maintenance together with training and indoctrination on use of equipment will continue to hold -2- the line on repair costs. BUILDING REPAIR $100.00 Estimated minimal estimate for contingency for required building repairs. ¸9. JANITORIAL SERVICE $1,100.00 This is a slight increase over 1977 to allow for rising costs for the routine janitorial services. 10. JAIL/BREATHALIZER $1,000.00 This estimated cost is for expenses incurred in drawing blood samples in conjunction with DWI arrests and prisoner maintenance while confined to the Hennepin County Jail. 11. GASOLINE/OIL $13,000.00 Estimated figure based on the past history together with allowance for estimated increase in the cost of the petroleum products. 12. SUPPLIES $6,200.00 This represents a decreased estimate from 1977 for normal operating materials and supplies and uniforms. It is believed prudent use of materials and careful analysis of these will allow this estimate to be met. 13. EQUIPMENT RENTAL $5,098.00 This expense is for maintenance repair and contract expenses for required radio service. It also includes estimated costs for Xerox copy machine rental costs. 14. INSURANCE $12,000.00 This represents police department costs for all required general insurance coverage including motor vehicles. -3- 15. DUES $75.00 This figure includes membership to county, state and national Chiefs of Police organizations. 16. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $15,300.00 This figure allows for anticipated increases in benefits that may be negotiated by the union for the upcoming year. The estimate provides funds for both increased hospitalization and the possible inclusion of a dental plan. This figure should not be any higher but may decrease somewhat, depending entirely on the final contract agreement. 17. PERA $31,416.00 Required contribution for department personnel. This figure is somewhat reduced by state aid reimbursement for PERA contributions. 18. MISCELLANEOUS $2,000.00 This amount reflects allocation for the city share in participation in the Urban Corp internship program. This program provides full time CSO student interns at a cost to the city of just $33 per week. This allocation also allows for $100 per month allowance to the Reserve Program. These funds would be utilized for necessary training,supplies and materials. It is anticipated community.support will allow for the Reserve organization to be largely if not totally self supporting. 19. CAPITAL OUTLAY $14,372.00 This cost reflects replacement for or purchase of the below listed needed equipment. The above figure is the total 1978 ammurized amount for these items. Three compact unmarked police vehicles to replace two 76 Chevrolets and one 74 Plymouth. Expected useful life is 3 years. Total cost estimate is $13,500. Annual ammu~ization is $4,500 per year. These vehicles would be used for 8 months in 1978. Therefore the total cost for the year would be $3,000, One animal control truck to replace a 1973 Dodge truck. Expected life expectancy is 3 years for the truck. This also includes a specialized cargo container for animal pick ups with an expected useful life of 12 years, however is figured below as being ammurized over three years. Total cost of the vehicle and cargo container is $6,000 plus trade in of present vehicle. Annual cost over 3 years is $2,000 per year. -4- 3. Four marked police vehicles to replace three 77 Chevrolets and one 76 Chevrolet. Expected useful life is 18 months. (It should be noted we have previously replaced marked squad cars every 12 months. I believe the initiation of a preventive maintenance program will insure a longer useful life thereby cutting total costs. This would result in a savings of the purchase of four cars in each 36 month period.) These vehicles would not be purchased until October of 1978. Ammurization over 18 months is $1,111.11 per month or a total of $3,333.33 for 1978. 4. Two speed detection radar devices which would equip two marked squads with the latest most technologically advanced speed detection radar units available. They would replace one outdated 7 year old radar system. This new system allows for all types of speed detection, both moving and stationary. Useful life is estimated at 10 years. Total cost is $5,200. Ammurization over 3 years would total the 1978 cost at $1,733.33. 5. Five tacographs, which is a device to be installed in marked vehicles. The device gives 24 hour a day monitoring of these vehicles' speed, mileage, idle and off time. Estimated useful life is 10 years. Total price in 1978 is $1,250. 6. Five oxygen/resuscitator units which would replace five existing pieces of equipment which are outdated and function improperly and inadequately. Total cost on these units is $1,625 plus trade in of the present equipment. Total 1978 cost is $1,625. 7. Breathalizer which would replace the existing 7 year old unit which is in constant need of repair and has been evaluated as only worthwhile as a backup unit. Total cost is approximately $1,000, However federal funds have been made available in 1978 to offset half of the cost. Total 1978 cost is $500. 8. Office equipment to include one typewriter at $750 which would replace an existing outdated piece of equipment. Also included would be dictation equipment at a cost of $1,569 to replace the existing outdated, inefficient and unworkable equipment. The new dictation equipment will allow for dictation of reports by officers while in the squad thereby increasing efficiency and allowing for more patrol time, better budgeting of time necessary for required reports. Total 1978 cost for both the typewriter and dictation equipment is $3,194.00. -5- 00'000'~- 00'I9~'0~£ g pa~o~ guIuI~a~ ~os~uuIR moa~ spun~a ~V~O~ ~JIS 00'00I~I 00'ZL[~I /oo'ooo'z 00'00~'~I / O0'~L .O0'000'gI ?00'~60'~ /O0'OOZ'9 /,.00'000'EI /oo'ooo'~ , 00'00I'I /oo'oo~ /oo'oo~'~ ./ 00'09L~Z 00'096~g / 00'0gI .~ oo'o~z 00'00£ 'IVSOJSIG OOG XV~IMO 'IVII~VD SNOIZJIMDS~MS/SHHG MDNVMflSNI 'IVZNMH 7IO/SVO MO~INV£/XMGN/1FI HIV~MMONI~I~ S~OOHDS/SNOI~NHANOD/~HAVH~ SHIII%I/~ NOIIVDI%9/I~/ONIINIH~ ~HDI~/M/MOV~$O~ 'IVNOISSMMOMJ ~L6I ~aan~~!puadxH a~!IOd pa~emI~sH ~ F~L~D Estimated Police Expenditures 1978 SALARIES PROFESSIONAL POSTAGE/FREIGHT PUBLICATION UTILITIES TRAVEL/CONVENTIONS/SCHOOLS EQUIPMENT REPAIR BUILDING REPAIR LAUNDRY/JANITOR JAIL/BREATHALIZER/BLOOD GASOLINE/OIL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT RENTAL INSURANCE DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PERA MISCELLANEOUS CAPITAL OUTLAY DOG DISPOSAL $ 167,705.00 189.00 157.00 95.OO 3,755.00 1,739.00 2,205.00 63.00 693.00 630.00 8,190.00 3,406.00 3,212.00 7,560.00 47.00 9,639.00 19,792.00 1,260.00 9,054.00 693.00 SUB TOTAL Less refunds from Minnesota Training Board $ 240,584.00 - 3,150.00 TOTAL $ 237,434.00 00'90Z'£9 00'0~9 00'9~'99 p~eoR ~ulutea~ e~os~uuIR moa~ spun~a ss~ 00'LBI 00'09~ 00'I9£'g O0'I09'g 00'£I 00'090'~ 00'L99 00'9~0~I 00'OIZ~g 00'0LI 00'LBI 00'LI 00'~6~ 00'69~ 00'£I0~I 00'~Z 00'£~ 00'I~ O0'~LO'~ 'IVSOaSI~ AVq~QO qV~I~VD SQOMNVqqMDSI~ S~IMMNM~ SNOII~IMDS~S/S~ MDNVMflSNI 'IV~N~ SMIq~HflS qIO/MNI%OSVD ~O0~/MMZIqVHZVRM~/qIV£ S%00HDS/SNOI~NMANOD/qMA%qt~ NOI~VDIq~Qa ~HDIMM&/MOV~$OJ 'IVNOISSMMOHJ 9L6I saan~Ipuadx~ a~!IO~ pa~sm!~s~ MINNETRISTA Estimated Police Expenditures 1978 SALARIES PROFESSIONAL POSTAGE/FREIGHT PUBLICATION UTILITIES TRAVEL/CONVENTIONS/SCHOOLS EQUIPMENT REPAIR BUILDING REPAIR LAUNDRY/JANITOR JAIL/BREATHALIZER/BLOOD GASOLINE/OIL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT RENTAL INSURANCE DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PERA MISCELLANEOUS CAPITAL OUTLAY DOG DISPOSAL $ 45,075.00 51.00 43.00 25.00 1,013.00 469.00 595.00 17.00 187.00 170.00 2,210.00 1,054.00 867.00 2.040.00 13.00 2,601.00 5,341.00 340.00 2,443.00' 187.00 SUB TOTAL Less refunds from Minnesota Training Board $ 64,554.00 - 850.00 TOTAL $ 63,704.00 ST. BONIFACIUS Estimated Police Expenditures SALARIES PROFESSIONAL POSTAGE/FREIGHT PUBLICATION/PRINTING UTILITIES TRAVEL/CONVENTIONS/SCHOOLS EQUIPMENT REPAIR BUILDING REPAIR LAUNDRYfJANITOR JAIL/BREATHALIZER/BLOOD GASOLINE/OIL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT RENTAL INSURANCE DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PERA MISCELLANEOUS CAPITAL OUTLAY DOG DISPOSAL 6,250.00 9.OO 8.00 5.00 179.00 83.00 105.OO 3.00 33.00 30.00 390.00 186.00 153.00 360.00 2.00 459.00 942.00 60.00 431.00 33.00 SUB TOTAL Less refunds from Minnesota Training Board $ 11,423.03 - 150.00 TOTAL $ 11,273.03 Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364 August 15, 1977 ~ound Council and City ~anager; We feel with the amount of area and industries we cover, that an Arial platform truck with a pump should be considered in the very near future, because it will take about two (2) to three (3) years for delivery. The appz'oximate price of this ~it is ~200,000.00. In addition to the truck, we would also need an addition on t~e Station for the new unit. A new bay in the Station would cost approximately ~100,000.00. By Action of the Board, ~ound Vol. Fire Department Gene Garvais, Chief Box 37, ~found, ~ru~esota 55364 NOUND VOLUNTEEr. FIiiE DEPA~T~/W~Y~NT BUDGET 1978 rersonal-Service: oOSalaries: Firemen 37, ~ 3.50 Per hour Fire Chief Annually ~oo Ass'b Chief Annually Fire ~a~shall ;~m o Fire Preveution Program --'--- (Staff & ~[aterials) Drill Master~~ ~ o o Officers (Captains-120.OO,Lts. 80.00, 5 Companies) Preventive ~aintenance Oontractuai Service: Utilities Insurance & Bonds Audit Professional Hennepin County Sheriff ( Radio & Alarm ) materials & Supplies Page Boy~onitors (2 new Portables, 4 Channel) Base Station Radio ( 4 Channel ) 2~,, 400 F~.~ Hos~ 400 Ft. 1½" Hose 600 Ft. 4" Hose 2 ~ S A Nask Units & 2 Extra Bottles 4" Storz to 3-2½ NST ~ale 2½" Female - 2-1½ NST Gated ~Iale (Lightweight) 2 - 1½ NST Nozzles 2 Sanarosa Li~nt.~eight Nozzles ! - 4" Hose Protectors ( Bridges ) 10 Ft. 1 - 2½" Hose Protectors ( Bridges ) 10 Ft. Batteries Air Splints Adaptor head for globe unit Truck Fittings & Adaptors Cleaning Supplies Office Supplies Boots (6 Pairs) Helm~bs (6) S~lvmge Covers Gloves & ~litteus Foam First Aid Supplies $32,O00.00~'/' 3,000.OOw'T~ 800.00 5 oo.oo ~,500.00 300.00.'"'"" t,000.00,-''~ '4,200.00~-. $4~,soo.oo $5,800.oo/ 7,000.00~" 15o.oo 5oo.oo~5.. ~,ooo.oo-- .$16,450.00 $2,860.00 1,540.00 1,060.00 770.00 2,640.00 1,320.00 4oo.oo 185.00 440.00 60O.0O 255.00 125.00 3OO.OO 100.00 3OO.OO 500.00 275.00 330.00 265.00 400.00 500.00 250.O0 500.00 Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364 FAGE 2 BUDGET CO~T. ~;t!aterials & Supplies: Building Repairs - Addition to Building Roof Misc. Equipment Repairs Postage Printing & Publ{cations Repair to #9 6onventions & School Rescue & Training Regional International Chief's Ass'n ~irmesota State Fire School (5 men) State Conference (5 men) State Chiefs Ass'n (2 men) International Instructors Conference (2 men) International Chiefs Conference DUes & SuOscriptions United Fire Fighters Ass'n ~utual Aid Ass'n international Chiefs Ass'n State Fire Chiefs Ass'n State Rescue Ass'n State Instructors Ass'n Smoke Eater Fire Chiefs Nagazine Engineering Magazine Fire Commercial Instructors Manu-~l Misc. Subscriptions 'Eq,iipment Rental uas, Oil, Fuel aoad Materials miscellanious Fire Dept. Car Capitol Outlay "Replacement of Engines" /Reccommended Total Budget Submitted By Board of Directors · Mound Vol. Fire Dept. $15,ooo.oo'/ 8,000.00,~"_ 3, 5oo.oo'C. lO0. O0 ~ 250.00 1.000.0~-"' $31,350.00 $fioo.oo 5OO.OO 1,500.00 1,500.00 5OO.OO 1,OO0.00 8OO.OO $1,250.00 20.00 20.00 50.00 3O.OO 15.00 15.oo 100.oo 15.oo 15.00 · lO.OO 75.00 2O0.OO ~1.,815.00 ~'' $3,300.00~'' 1,500.00 5oo.oo~ 500.o0 7,500.00''~ ..1~,000..o0.~ g28~}00.00 ~,~0.oo WAFTA Lowell D. Lun. d Secretary-Treas,~:er: 7801 Mitchell Roed Eden Pralrle~ M;.nnesoto 55343 May 1, 1977 SUBJECT: 1978 Budget to be submitted to the City Council by the Fire Chief Preliminary proposed budget for 1978 was presented to the Executive Committee of WAFTA, a motion was made and carried to present the following budget to their Fire Chief in which he will approve it and present it to their City Council as re~ired by VIII, Section 5 of the Joint Powers Agreement. P~operty Payment Heating & Electricity Insurance Office Supplies Legal & Accom~ting Bldg. & Mechanical Maintenance Supplies Water Systems & Supplies Maintenance Wages Mechanical Breakdown Additional Capital Outlet Fund 3,748 · 93' 1,800.00 600.00 250.00 300.00 1,500. O0 45o.oo 1,000.00 1,500. O0 ~2 ~ 500 · O0 $1 3,648.93 In accordance with the Joint Powers Agreement, members have until July 1, 1977 to make comments or recom~endations regarding this proposed budget. Each departments share of this budget is $1,240.82 (1/11 of the $13,648.93) payable by February 1, 1978. Respectfully SubmitiSed.~ Lowell D.' Lund Secretary--Treasurer ,,I CKHJ CKING DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY 7905 MITCHELL RD. ! EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55343 EMERGENCY POLICE AND FIRE (612) 544-9511 August 26, 1977 Mayor Timothy Lovaason City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN. 55364 PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICE (612) 944-2700 Dear Mayor Lovaason: On August 20, 1977, the City of Eden Prairie Department of Public Safety received three burglary reports from houses listed on the Parade of Homes promotional list. A net loss from these three houses amounted to over $12,000.00. Similar burglaries occurred in Minnetonka, South Lake Minnetonka, Excelsior, Shorewood and Mound. This similarity was apparent in that model homes were the target and in each case most of the furnishings inside, including carpets, throw rugs, furniture, pictures, light fixtures and other building materials were taken. On August 23, 1977, Detective Officer Ron Bostrom contacted our department and informed us that he had a possible lead on the aforementioned burglaries. Through Officer Bostrom's and Sgt. William Hudson's diligent efforts, two parties were a~rested in connection with all the burglaries and a vast amount of the stolen property was located and returned to the owners. On behalf of our entire department, I would'like to thank Officer Bostrom and Sgt. Hudson for their spirit of cooperation and commend them both for the professional manner in which they handled the case from start to finish. Very truly yours, CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jack Hacking, Director~ Fire and Police Divisions JH:dh CC: Mr. Leonard Kopp, City Manager~' Mr. Charles Johnson, Chief of Police Detective Officer Ron Bostrom Sgt. William Hudson Dear Mr. Kopp: This letter confirms the intention of our Flood Insurance Specialist~ Larry L. Bailey , to attend a public meeting: Date: Monday, September 26, 1977 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: City Council Chambers - Mound City Hall 5341Maywood Road Mound, WN 55364 The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the Mound, Minnesota Flood Insurance Study and answer general questions regarding the National Flood Insurance Program. Representatives of the Department of Natural Resources and the study contractor will als,o be there. We have enclosed a sample news release which you may wish to use to publicize the meeting in your local newspaper. Also we suggest that special notices be sent to financial institutions~ insurance agents~ and real estate brokers servicing your community as these groups have a special interest in keeping abreast of the community's status in the program. Please let us know if there is any other information you need in advance of the meeting. Sincerely, Glenn C. Woodard, Jr. Acting Regional Director, FiA Enclosure McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ~ LAND SURVEYORS~ SITE PLANNERS August 22, 1977 Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: Preliminary Assessment Roll 3 Points Streets - Revisions Gentlemen: As requested, we submit herewith the revised Preliminary Assessment Roll for the street improvements and storm sewer in Three Points. The revision consists of giving a footage assessment only to those properties which have previously been assessed for a street improvement. The amount to be assessed has been calculated as follows: STREETS Construction Costs Administrative Costs Engineering, Staking, Inspection and Preparation of Assessment Roll Legal and Fiscal Costs Interest During Construction Total Deduct City Share of CUrb Total To Be Assessed $57,497.00 260.00 8,530.00 423.00 4,002.00 $70,712.00 4,171.00 $66,541.00 12805 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-3700 22 NORTH MAIN STREET, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE (612) 897~029 SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING DIVISION, MARSHALL, MINNESOTA 56258 TELEPHONE (507) 532-5820 City of Mound Page Two August 22, 1977 The unit, area, and square footage assessment were calculated as follows: 40% of Cost ~ 30 Units = $887.21 per Unit. 30% of Cost ~ 4,025.36 Feet = $4.96 per Foot. 30% of Cost ~ 302,745 square feet = 6.6¢ per Square Foot. STORM SEWER Construction Costs Administrative Costs Engineering, Staking, Inspection and Preparation of Assessment Roll Legal and Fiscal Costs Interest During Construction Total Deduct City Share Total To Be Assessed $18,287.00 83.00 2,694.00 134.00 1,272.00 $22,470.00 2,696.00 $19,774.00 The assessment per square foot of drainage area is $19,774.00 ~ 346,630 square feet = 5.71C/square foot. If you have any questions on anything in this Assessment Roll, we would be pleased to discuss this further at your convenience. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNU~SON ASSOCIATES, Swanson, P.E. INC. LS:sw Enclosure ~:~[-- 03O0 ~0 CD 0 0 o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4J Or',, 0 ~q 0 0 0 0 ~:~ ,-..I ~Q 0 0 0 cO 0 0 cO ~D 0 aO ~.~ 0 ~,~ ~.~ Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD ~D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD CD CD CD Lr3 0 CD O~ o o o o o o CD -,-d 0 er3 ~ 0 0~: o ~ ~ 0 0 ~ o t.n O. o o o ~:~ rt- I-o r~ L.n ul I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0 0 0 0 :> o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ~ o o ~ o o o o o o o o -~- o I I 0 0 ~o0 ~ ~0 0 0 0 0 ~0 0 0 ~' 0 D:~ rt ~..~ ~ I O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .c- O 0 0~] ~0 0 o CD 0 I I I 0 CD CD 0 I I I 4.-I O 4J 0 ~ ,..,~ 0 0 0 0 0 co c'q o cD -..T r-.., ~ c'.xl ('-xl ,,~ c-,i r-., ~-I u'~ cxl c) ',.o k.o ~ ',.o · ,.o -~t o o o'l o 00 o,I [th ~ 0'3 u~ o o o 00 mi o o o.1 c~ -.1- 04 CD 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 cq 1-,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o kO '...ID ',.0 ',0 McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ·LANO SURVEYORS I SITE PLANNERS August 22, 1977 Leonard Kopp City Manager City of ~ound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, ~innesota 55364 Subject: Subdivision of part of Lot 1, Block 12, Mound Terrace Dear Hr. Kopp: We have reviewed the proposed plat of the subdivision of part of Lot 1, Block 12, Hounds Terrace which is attached to this letter and have the following comments. 1) No cohtour maps of the area, street grades, utility or storm sewer plans have been presented for review. I understand that thes~ are now being prepared. Until these materials are available, a proper review of the plat cannot be completed. 2) I understand that Hennepin County will require an additional 7' of R.O.W. South of County Road 15. This will require some revision in the proposed plot. 3) The Northerly part of the proposed plot is low and receives runoff from the County Road and from a sizable area east of the proposed plat. I have visited the site and it appears that a storm sewer may be required which will start at the County Road and outlet southwest of the proposed plat to an existing wetlands area. If this is the case, drainage easements may be required from adjacent property owners. 4) Sanitary Sewer and water can be extended from County Road 15 to serve the property. 5) We have estimated the construction cost of the sewer; water, streets (with concrete curb and gutter) and storm sewer as follows: 12805 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-3700 22 NORTH MAIN STREET, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE (612) 879-8029 SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING DIVISION, MARSHALL, MINNESOTA 56258 TELEPHONE (507) 532-5820 Leonard Kopp -2- August 22, 1977 Streets Storm Sewer Sanitary Sewer Watermain $10,100.00 11,500.00 7,700.00 6~400.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost ........ $35,700.00 Engineering & Inspection 3,600.00 Total Estimate Cost ...... $39,300.00 If the Council wishes, we can revise these costs after the final construction plans for the project are completed, however, we feel they are all reasonably accurate with the possible exception of the Storm Sewer costs which may change when the final design is completed. If you have any questions on this, please advise. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. LS:ts Enclosure 001 I ! I 'ON O VO~t A I NDO..~ 'OA 7~ O00/VlNA 7 Subd. 1. Subdo 2. Subi. 3. Subdo 4. S~hi. 5. Scalo of Drawing. Legal description. Dimensions of lot and north point. Section 1~2 z35 Subi. 1 '" Dimensions of front, rear and side yards. Locations of all existing buildings on the lot. Subd. 6. Location of the proposed building or construction. In locating a ~esidence upon a lot provisions must be made to p~rmit the location of a possible future garage if no garage is constructed with the residence. ~a~. 7. Location of stakes established by the surveyor alomg each side lot Line a distance of thirty-five (35) ar~i sixty-five (65) feet from the front lot corner. The maintenance of these stakes once established by the surveyor shall be the responsibiLity of %he b~i]ding permit applicant, Subd. 8. The location of all easements as shown on record plats. Subd. 9. Crade elevations at the following points, ~.,ch elevations may be based, on assessed datum but ~h~ll b~ tied by the surveyor to a specified bench mark for which the elevation has been obtained f~om the City Engineer' s office. a. Each lot corner (either existing or proposed). b. Crown of proposed street at each lot line extended. ¢, P~oposed lawn and driveway elevations at the street side of building. Subd. 10, The proposed disposal of drainage of surface waters (indicate direction of surface water drainage by arrows). ae A permit is issued with the firm understanding that the relativ~ elevations of the proposed lot ar~ the established o= proposed street grade shall not conflict in ~uch ~anner ps to c~use damag~ by altering the drainage or flow of sur- face waters to the street or nearby streets or to the adja- cent or nearby pr~mises. The Building Inspector may deny a permit for the construction of a b~ilding or stluctur~ upon ground which is too low for proper drainage and in the course of the construction, alteration, repair or moving of any ~ilding or structure, no obstruction, diwrstons, bridging or confining, temporary or perm~.nent, of the existir~g char~nel or any natural waterway through or over ~ich any lake, stream or surface water naturally flows ~hall be made without approval of the City Engineering and Building Department. ~' cu v£ I O Denotes Iron Monument a Denotes Wood Stake XO00.O DenOtes Existing Elevation {000.0) Denotes Proposed Elevation ~ - Denotes Direction of Surface Drainage Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation-~- 958.0 Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = 957. 5 Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation----- 950.0 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: Lot !, Block 5, PRESTON WOODS SECOND ADDITION And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. It also shows the Iocaton of the stakes as set for a proposed building..As su~rveyed Thomas S. 'B-ergquist/7~)~ I MINNEAPOLIS. HUTCHINSON and MARSHALL, MINNESOTA XOOO.O Denotes Existing Elevation Proposed Top of Fou~datio~ Elevation ~ (OOO.O) Denotes Proposed Elevation Proposed Garage Floor Elevation ~ ~ Denotes Direction of Surface Drainage Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation ~ I hereby ce~i~ that this is a true and correct representation of a suwey of the boundaries of: Lot i, Block 6, PRESTON ~00DS SECOND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Hinnesota And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any. from or on said land. It also shows the Iocaton of the stakes as set for a proposed building. As suweyed Thomas S. Bergqui~--- Land Surveyor, Minn. Reg. No. 7 7 2 5 I I I A~s~ 23, 1977 COS~CIL ~.~i~w~OP~DTM N0o The Honors, hie Mayo~, and ~ity Council Th~ City P~nag~ 42,500 ~ FORM OF PROPOSAL FORM OF PROPOSAL FOR CONTRACT WORK ROOF AND SKYLIGHT REPAIRS TO: MOUND CITY HALL MOUND, MINNESOTA OPENING DATE 8-22-77 OPENING TIME 10:00 A.::. City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Gentlemen: The undersigned, being familiar With the local conditions affecting the cost of the work and with the Bidding Documents and Contract Documents and Addenda Numbers no:~e , and in accordance with the provisions thereof, hereby proposes to furnish all labor and materials, and equip- ment and services necessary to complete the work in accordance with the proposed Contract Documents for the sum of: Proposal A: dollars ($..g95.c~ .) Proposal A-1: :~J~.~:,u :iUNDIED iIINET¥ FiVE dollars ($1,705.oQ Proposal B: Proposal C: dollars ($1,21'o.o9 dollars ($ In submitting this bid, it is understood that the right is reserved by the City of Mound to reject any and all bids. It is agreed that this bid may not be withdrawn for a period of thirty (30) days after the opening of bids. The bidder acknowledges receipt of the following addenda: Submitted by: Date ~u, jusc 22, 1977 OFFICIAL ADDRESS: 7C, 5 'r,:lor <:~cet ::imieapoli r,, :bi. 55413 By CENT2JkL XOOFIN G CONPfd!Y (Firm Nan~e) ,~John F. So:acrs Title President HERBERT P. LEFLER CURTIS A. PEARSON J. DENNIS O'BRIEN JOHN B. DEAN JEFFREY J. STRAND LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER. PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ I100 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 August 23, 1977 TELEPHONE Mr. Leonard L. Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Rolelofs vs. Mound Dear Leonard: I am enclosing herewith the final order in the Roelofs case which has not been changed and was filed in the District Court on August 22, 1977. Unless Mr. Reed and the Roelofs appeal, this should conclude the handling of this matter. Very truly yours, Curtis A Pearson CAP:ms Enclosure cc: Mayor and Council ON I_AK~ lv~INNE"TONKA INDIAN BURIAL MOUNDS 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 August 23, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp - City Manager Chuck Johnson - Chief of Police Non'intoxicating Liquor License for Tom Thumb store 2222 Commerce Blvd., Mound, Minn. (Peter B. Ward) Record checks were run on the above mentioned subject for criminal history background with negative results. The subject was also checked for any outstanding warrants with negative results. The police department has no information that would be derrogatory or in any way would suggest that the application for non-intoxicat~ ing malt liquor sales license should be denied. Respect fu~l~y, Chuck 'Johns on Chief of Police CJ: 1 ao WILLIAMI~ / O'BRIEN ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS / PLANNERS / C[:)I'~]STI=IUCTION MANAGEMENT August 19, 1977 Mr. Curtis A. Pearson LeFevere, Lefler, Hamilton & Pearson llO0 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Re: Mound City Hall Dear Mr. Pearson: In accordance with our conversation in your office today, this letter is to confirm that we will attempt to resolve the Mound City Hall skylight- roof leaks at no expense to the City. As explained, we feel that the carpentry, roofing and skylight contractors are involved in this problem. We have had a great deal of trouble obtain- ing the cooperation necessary because some parties are just plain not responsive and also, the resPonsibility for the problem is difficult to ass i gn. To date, I have obtained the cooperation of Central Roofing only and as it now stands, we will participate in the costs of correction with them. It appears that the work was not constructed according to the design. Roofing felts don't adequately cover the areas required at the intersec- tion between the roof and the skylight. Central Roofing isn't sure that their people cut the material too short (it may have been the skylight contractor or the carpenter) and are hesitant to assume the costs of cor- rection. In order to expedite the work, we have agreed to split the cost with them. In addition, over the past several months it has been suggested that the roof slope be changed at the bottom of the skylight to carry water further out onto the roof surface. While we don't feel that this is necessary, there is some strong feeling on the part of others and we will also pay the costs associated with this work. Central Roofing will not participate in this cost, as they don,t regard it as necessary. The perimeter of the roof will be corrected. As you know, in order to get the work done we did share costs with Central Roofing on this before, but it appears that the correction loosened up and may be the source of the water on the north wall. Mr. Pearson August 19, 1977 Page Two With respect to the installation of roof drains, we don't feel that they are required and if installed are not a corrective measure. Therefore, if they are desired, the cost should be the responsibility of the City. I hope this accurately summarizes our discussion and I'm sorry I won't be able to attend the Council Meeting on Tuesday. If necessary, I will meet with the Council during the following week. We are interested in getting the problem solved and do appreciate the situation from the City's point of view. Obviously, we wish that the problem had never occurred and also that we weren't going to have to assume the financial obligation for a major part of the correction, but it does seem to be the most expedient thing to do and we hope to avoid any further hard feelings that are a result of this situation. Upon reviewing the bids for proposals A, A-1 and B, we will take immediate steps to start the corrective work and I will contact Mr. Kopp. S~ncerely, ~ · · ~mesW. O'Brien, AIA ' - Nice~President dWilliams/O'Brien Associates, Inc. 17 North Washington Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 JWO/kp cc: ,~q~Fr. Leonard Kopp, City of Mound the A~oz~ey points <~.l~; in t;he 1~.~% p~ph this CLAYTON L- LEFEVERE HERBERT P. LEFLER CURTIS A. PEARSON J. DENNIS O'BRIEN JOHN E. DRAWZ JOHN B. DEAN DAVID J. KENNEDY GLENN E. PURDUE JAMES D.LARSON CHARLES L. L£FEVEF~E HERBERT P. LEFLER Ii~ JEFFREY J. STRAND Mr. Len l(opp, City Manager city of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ IIOO FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA August 25, 1977 TELEPHONE (612) 333-0543 Re: McAthie v. City of Mound Dear Len: I am enclosing herein a four page letter from the attorneys for Mr. and Mrs. Ronald McAthie concerning their position and their efforts to Torrens off a part of the Water Bank Commons. It appears to me that the petitioner has a very novel approach to the problem and I think they will have a difficult time to Torrens off this property if the City of Mound interposes an answer or objection. You will note that one of their contentions is that the City has not previously contested registration proceedings in the same area and as a result persons have Torrensed off a part of the Commons. I believe that situation does not exist today, and you have shown me the various areas where the land was Torrensed off and the problems which have resulted both from the standpoint of a road system and for access along the lake. It appears to me that the Council has two choices: (1) to direct us to negotiate with the property owner to see if there is some middle ground for settlement; or (2) to direct the City staff to resist the registration of this land and authorize us to interpose an objection and to take whatever steps are necessary to protect the public interest in the Water Bank Commons. City Attorney CAP: ih Enclosure 1616 p~kRK A'VIZNUI~ blINXEAX~OLIS, /~IIN.~-IESOTA 55404 August 24, 1977 Mr. Curtis A. Pearson LeFevere, Lefler, Hamilton & Pearson 1100 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Re: Our File No. 13232 Land Registration Case No. 17895 McAthie v. City of Mound, et al Dear Mr. Pearson: In a letter dated July 8, 1977, from Mr. James Gilbert of our office, he enclosed copies of the Application and various RePorts of Examiner in the above ~referenced matter. On July 26, 1977, in a telephone conversation with you, we discussed this matter, and I set forth various facts and reasons regarding our position in this case. You requested that I set forth these facts and our reasoning in a letter to enable you to discuss this case with the Mound City Council prior to our pro- ceeding formally. I apologize for not submitting this letter sooner, however, I have been on vacation since July 29, 1977. As you know, the McAthies are the registered owners of the following described property in the City of Mound, to-wit: Lots 1 to 5 inclusive and all that part of Peabody Avenue, vacated lying between eXtensions across it of the Northeasterly and the Southwesterly lines of Lot 1, Block 1, "Lake Side Park: A. L. Crocker's 1st Division, Mound, Minnetonka", accord- ing to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County. Subject to a reservation by the State of Minnesota of mineral and mineral rights as to Lots 1 to 5 inclusive. ~]~StI~flE StI E R , SINGER Mr. Curtis A. Pearson Page ~4o August 24, 1977 This property is more commonly referred to as 5420 Breezy Road. The pla% for "Lake Sid~ Park: A. L. Crocker's ls~ Diuision, Mound, Minnetonka" was originally filed for record in the Of- fice of the Register of Deeds, Hennepin County, on December 12, 1907. The area designated as "Water Bank Common" on this'plat was not dedicated to the public use; only the roads, avenues and streets were so dedicated. The plat as filed does not show the channel which presently cuts across parts of Lots 1, 2, and the vacated part of Peabody Avenue owned by the McAthies as well as a portion of the "Water Bank Common" appurtenant to the Mc- Athies' property. All of "Water Bank Common" appurtenant to the McAthies' property is the subject matter of their petition to' register this appurtenant property as indicated in their peti- tion and the attached survey. In 1955, Mr.. and Mrs. Edward Grachek purchased Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 38, 39, 40, and 41, Block 1, "Lake Side Park: A. L. Crocker's 1st Division, Mound, Minnetonka". Subse- quent thereto, the Gracheks and an adjoining property owner, one Wilbur D. Roberts, applied for permits to .the State of Minnesota, Department of Conservation (now known as the Department of Natural Resources) to excavate and remove materials from the bed of Lake Minnetonka in the construction of the channel which presently cuts across a portion of the "Water Bank Common", which is the subject. matter of the McAthies' petition, as well as parts of Lots 1, 2, and the vacated part of Peabody Avenue owned by the McAthies as shown on the survey attached to the McAthies' petition. The per- mits were granted. The permits authorized the permitees to de- posit the materials excavated on the property adjoining the channel. The permittees did, in fac%, excavate the channel and de- posited the excavated materials on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, .10, and 11, Block 1, "Lake Side Park: A. L. Crocker's 1st Division, Mound, Minnetonka" as well as that portion of "Water Bank Co~on" appurtenant to Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 which is the subject matter of the McAthies' petition. · Until 1955, when the Gracheks purchased the property described in the above paragraph, said property, together with the appurtenant "Water Bank Common", was 'swampland. It was not in the actual possession of anyone; it had no improvements of any character upon it and was never used or ever intended to be used by the City of Mound for any public purpose whatever. In other words, the appurtenant "Water Bank Common" described above had long been abandoned by its dedicators and assigns. )IESHBt~SHER, SINGER & SPENCE Mr. Curtis A. Pearson Page Three August 24, 1977 In 1958, the Gracheks built the house presently owned by the McAthies and began landscaping the "Water Bank Common" appurtenant thereto. In 1959, the Gracheks sold the property presently owned by the McAthies to Lyzum D. and Evelyn D. Cora, who in turn sold the property to Roy L. and Jean Lockwood in 1964, who in turn sold the property to Howard W. White in 1968. The Cotas, Lockwoods, and White continued the landscaping of the appurtenant "Water Bank Common" by placing additional soil and rock on the property, grading the property and plant-. lng trees and grass on the property, thereby creating the ap-. purtenant "Water Bank Common" as it exists today. The property registered in the name of the McAthies, to- gether with the appurtenant "Water Bank Common" has been con- tinually possessed and maintained by the McAthies' predecessors in title as well as the McAthies as one parcel. The City of Mound has never objected to the placing of the above described improvements on the appurtenant "Water Bank Common"; has never objected to the possession and maintenance of said property; and has never maintained or offered to maintain said property. It is our position that the property which is the subject of the McAthies' petition to register was abandoned until the Gracheks took possession and commenced improving it. The Mc- Athies' predecessors in interest actually created the property as it exists today and the McAthie's and their predecessors in interest have.continued to possess, use and maintain the property to the exclusion of the City of Mound and further the City of Mound has stood by silently for many years without taking any positive action to assert their rights to the property in ques- tion until the McAthies commenced this action to register the property. Further, it is our position that the City of Mound has set a precedent in that for many years the City of Mound has allowed various property owners in the area to register "Water Bank Com- mon'' land without objection. I specifically call your attention to registration proceedings in Abraham Lincoln Addition to Lake Side Park in Torrens Cases No. 12872, 12840, 12891 and' 13964. Further, based upon principals of equity, it is our posi- tion that a municipality should not be immune from having land, which it holds title to, taken by adverse possession, particu- larly under the unique circumstances described herein. FIESHBESHER, SINGER & SPENC]'~ Mr. Curtis A. Pearson Page Four August 24, 1977 Finally, I am sure the City of Mound would have no objec- tion to this registration proceeding if the "Water Bank Common" which is the subject of this proceeding was still unimproved swampland. I would appreciate it if you would discuss this case with the Mound City Council and advise either myself or James Gilbert as to whether or not there is any room for discussion to settle this matter prior to our proceeding formally. We will expect ko hear from you on or before September 16, 1977, or we will pro- ceed formally. Verytruly ygurs, J~hn W. Hendrickson, Jr. cc: Mr. and Mrs. Ronald McAthie /..f3 ON L.AKIE MINNE'TONK~ 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESC)TA $5~64 INDIAN BURIAl. MOUNDII ADDRUe RIEPI.Y TO August 19, 1977 FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Kopp Public Works Office Northern Road East End In reguards to the question what has the city done down on Seton Channel, we have done nothing as far as the channel is concerned. On the east end of Northern Road was a fence, the fence has been removed from street property and the road has been graded from the existing surface to the channel wall that is existing for erosion control. The city also extended the drainage ditch to the existing rock rip rap wall. No parking signs have been placed on both sides of Northern Road from Edgewater east to the channel, a trash barrel is at the end of this road also. Guard rail post were installed at the channel end of Northern Road. ~ As far as complaints are concerned, we bad some pertaining to parking on private property and on the street, the no parking signs should have taken care of this, we have not had any complaints since then. The other complaint we bad received was that the fishermen were not putting their trash in the container that was provided, also the city did not empty the container often enough, we bare had no com- plaints since this work was done early this spring. To the best of my knowledge no dock exists along the channel area other than by private property, there are no sanitary facilities in the area where the people fish. Respectfully, Robert A. Miner Public Works Director RiM/jcn ~'!~s% 24~ i977 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 ~u~s% 25, 1977 INDIAN BURIAl., MOUNDil TELEPHONE (6].2) 472-].].55 Y~. Curtis A. Pearson 1100 First National B~nk Building Minneapolis, ~. 55402 Dear Curt: On Monday night, the Council discussed deferred assessments for residents over 65 years old. As a result of this discussion, the Council wishes to have drawn the necessary instrument (resolution or ordinance) to enter into deferred assessments. The above instrument whould contain the following regarding interest and determination of hardship: Interest - The interest to be carried on deferred assessment shall be at tt~ average rate the City pays on the bond issue covering the assessment. If I remember correctly, the last time we sold bonds the interest ranged from 4% to 5.75%, with the average being 5.383% or Something. Anyway, the intention of the Council is to charge the 5.383%. Hardship - On this, anyone with less than a gross income of $10,000 per year would be considered a hardship case if the assessment prin- cipal and interest exceeded 3% of their gross income. If the gross income was $10,OC1. or more, it would be considered that no hardship existed. Some assumptions were made when arriving at the aforementioned policy. 1. The deferment would be applicable to existing assessments if they met the above criteria. 2. If a person was making ~15,000 per year when the assessment was made and then retires and his income drops to $5,000 per year, he would be eligible for deferment if his principal and interest payment exceed $150.00 - 3% of his gross income. LLK/ .......... , Sincerely, City ~.~nager ' ON LAK. J~ MINNETONKA 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 5536~, August 25, 1977 INDIAN BI. IRIAL MOUI~tDlil TELEPHONE (612) 472-1155 Mr. Don David Don David Insurance Shelard Tower Suite 148 Hwy 12 & County Rd. 18 Minneapolis, MN. 55426 Subject: Dram Shop Claim Dear Don: Attached is a copy of a letter giving notice of a claim under the Dram Shop law. Nels is preparing a report of who was on duty and at what time. No time of purchase is given in the notice. There also remains the possibility that someone bought it for him if he is underage. Sincerely, -Leonard L. Kopp City Manager LLK/ms En¢l o cc: City Council City Attorney State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company August 23, 1977 State Farm Insurance Claim Office 7500 France Avenue, South Edina, Minnesota 554:35 Mound Municipal Liquor Store 2324 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, Minnesota CERTIFIED MAIL * RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Claim No: 23 5502 595 Insured : Joan Squier Date/Loss 7/29/77 Gentlemen: This letter will place you on notice under the Dram Shop whereby this Company will be pursuing a claim against you under Liquor Liability. Our insured's minor son reportedly was in your establishment on the above captioned date of loss and purchased either a six-pack or a twelve-pack of strong beer while apparently in an intoxicated state. Subsequent to that he was involved in a serious three-vehicle acci- dent in Delano, Minnesota whereby there are a multiple number of serious injury claims. It would be my suggestion that you turn'this letter over to your Liquor Liability insurance carrier for processing and contacting me immediately. CE/Atg Very truly yours, Charles Engdahl Claim Representative .OME OFF,CE: 8LOO~,.~TO.. ,~L,.O,S 8,70, /~.'~ Metropolitan Transit Commission 801 American Center Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 August 22, 1977 Mr. Leonard Kopp, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 612/~_L~1-0939 RE: Proposed Mound Park-Ride Facility CIP #11.40 (69) Dear Mr. Kopp: The MTC is presently developing a park-ride parogram to serve the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. The goal of the program is to encourage people to transfer from low occupancy autos to car pools, van pools and buses in order to encourage transit usage to reduce traffic con- gestion, reduce air pollution and conserve petroleum. The park-ride program consists of joint use park-ride facilities, established in conjunction with a church, shopping center or other activity center; and publicly owned park-ride facilities constructed specifically for park-ride use. The publicly owned park-ride facilities will be paved, lighted, parking lots designed to provide a convenient, secure facility in which persons can leave their cars and transfer to car pools, van pools or buses. Two Transit Planning Studies: The West Hennepin Route Ridership Improvement Project Study, January 1977, and the Regional Express Bus Network Study, June 1976, recommended construction of a permanent, publicly owned park-ride facility in the Mound area. It was recommended that this facility have a capacity of approximately 100 cars. On Friday, July 29, we had an opportunity to meet and discuss the park-ride concept and alternative locations for a publicly owned park- ride facility in Mound. A review was made of a potential site south of the commercial area in downtown Mound, east of Marion Street (in an area known as Mitchell's Garden). We feel this location has good potential for serving as a park-ride facility. We wish to continue working with the City to further develop a park- ride facility, and to investigate further any alternative park-ride locations which may be identified. uo$~ppv s 0a.~Eq~olI uS p~v~, ~la~I LL6< 'aZ ~J~O~! &O SUNSET M ND' RO~D ~ SHOR .............._,,~'' { Co.'Rd. Nc,:-t5 ) /.TI BOUL.~VARD ..... ~ ::... ROAD ELM ',~ ..~ LYNWOOD lo4 LANsDOfl MO~N~ ADVISOR~ P~RK COMmiSSION August 18, 1977 PRESENT Chairman Hal Lateen, Jon Lynott, Cathy Bailey, Toni Case, Pat Shay, Planning Coma. Rep. Lorraine Jackson, Park & Trees Ceord. Chris Bollis, City Planner Don Levens, City Mgr. Leonard Kopp, Council Reps. Bob Polston and Gordy Swenson, Summer Rec. Dir. Lori Thonander, and Sec. Karene Uhe Letter of resignation received from Diane Arneson. Chairman Lateen called the meeting to Order at ?:30 p.m. at City Hall. 1. MINUTES Jackson moved and Shay seconded to 'approve the minutes from the 7/21 .and 8/04 meetings as presented; Vote was unanimous. SUMMER REGREATIONREPORT Lori Thonander reported that the summer recreation program went very well, in general. Attendance was increased from last year, especially in morning sessions; weekly themes added interest; activities outside of the parks was well attended; parent's questionnaire very supportive. Lori felt a satellite was neededat Highland Park aud different or more advertising done earlier and more widespread would be advantageous next year. 3. TRAILS PRIORITIES Kopp stated that county would include· trails when upgrading their roads, and that ~1-4 on Priority List would be mostly completed by 1979. **Lynott moved and Shay seconded a motion to accept the proposed list of Bike trails as on Priority List of Proposed Bikeways, revised ?/15/76, except for amendment changing ~16 to rem4 "West~ge Blvd." instead of Oounty Rd. 44t Vote was .unanimous. WINTER REGHEATION PROGRAM Carter Hesse, Pr~s. of Hockey Boosters, was pr®sent to discuss Mound's plans for the warming house moved from Spring Park. He stated that last year they had approx. 350 hockey players, including 75 traveling, who played at four local rinks, three of which are the school district~m. They had games usually four weeknightS and Sat. morning. Spring Park hired a supervisor for'about five hours a'night to keep order, plus a maintenance man to take care of the ice. Hockey Boosters paid them $250 to help with the cost. Problems in Spring Park were inadequate parking and too close to neighborhood houses. The Park Comm. offer~ to keep the Boosters updated a~ to decisions regmz~ing the warming house and rink and invited them to the Sept. 4/scusaion meeting, at which time this will be be discussed. Discussion held on location of warming house, mainlydebatingIsland Park .rs, Tyrone Park and location within the ~rk. **Shay moved that the warming house be set on a foundation in Tyrone Park either in the SW or NV corner, depending upon investigation of the land and utilities accessability. Almo~ that the building Be a~cnted an earth-tone color - either brown or green, kson seconded and vote was unanimous. ~i~/ MANAGER'S REPORT There was ~ discussion abo~t the excawation being done across the street from the south end of Three Pointm Park. Levens reported that the ~n- vlronmental review Of that park show~ drainag~ and street improvements to be done. PARK & TREE COORD. REPORT Bollis discussed t~he diseased ~tree situation in Mound, re.porting tha~ about 2OO treesin Mound will be removed this year. The great variety of other mpe¢ie~ of trees that Mound has will help the appearance, despite this loss. 7. COUNCIL ~V!~oR~s RE~ORT Pols~on, substituting for Withhart, reported on Council action on Park recommendations. 8. PLANNING OOMM. ~EPORT Jackson rePOrted tha~ Me. 0lander, who i~ concerned about the swamp bekind her property, aas been invited to attend the next Planning Comm. disc. meeting. 9. 197~ BUDGET Tnms wlll be aduem ~o =ne ~ept. discussion meeting. Kopp stated not much HUD money will be available for 1978. Bollis is to look into dif- ferent types of federal funding available for Park interests. The meeting 'was adjourned at 10:15. Minutes of MOI~D YO~i~ COMMISSION - EPECIAL. g: ~O O~GANIZATION MEETING PR~ENT: Acting Chairman Deb McIntyr®, Anne Chase, Mark Jessen, Katie Phleger, Dawn Polston, R~n Bostrom~ Joy Fleming, Nsrry Pet®rson, Ron .Uhe, Council R®p. B~b Polston, and Sec. Karene Uh® VO LLm-~BALL PLANS Plans for the volleyball game with City Council were discussed. Game begins at 3:00 p.m. (2:00 gathering time for Conrac members) at Mound Bay Park - Surf~ide. Teams will play a ~2 pt. game, best of five. The following will be asked to ~erve as r®ferees~. G. Swenson (b)' D. Poiston), F..$oule (by D. McIntyre) and Ms.. Dennis ('by A. Chase). Any ~l~quipment needed is already at Free B's. The following committee~ were set up: Ref= Comm. ~ M. Peterson~ J. Fleming P.R. Comm. -R. Bostrom, A. ~has~, B. Polston Door Prizes & Questionnair® 2. ONECKING ACCT. The checking account records wer~ receiwe~ from a previous 'l[outh Comm. member for the Comm. private account. N. Peter~on and D,. M~:Intyre will transfer the account fr~m Navarre to Mound Stat~ ~ank and c~mng® the name on the account to Mound Westonka Youth O~mm. 3. ELECTION OF NE~ OFFTCERS The following were elected officers to ~erve for a one-year ter~: Chairman.- Deb McIatyre ~ice-Ohairman - Daw~ Polaton Treasurer - Mark Jessen Co-Treasurer - Ron Uhe Attendance Keeper - Merry Pet®r~on 4. T-SHIRTS J. Flemir~ reported that the, T-shirts of the Comm. are bei~~ located and. will be at the volleyball game to wear. 5. BY-LAWS The present by'laws (City Council Rem. No. ~7-~8) were follows: **The Youth Commission unanimously recommends the followin~': cha~ee to Res. No. 77-58: D.Eli~nate word "c~~=ed~ Delete las~ ~en~nee ~t~e ~u~ ~ be con~dere~t, for . . 5. A~ Delet~ 5. B. Delete 1 Change "That five member~" to rea~ "Ower .~ of v~ting members shall .,. ~ Eliminate "beyond~' Add "without a re~ble expiation. Change "7:30" to read YOuth Minutes 8/22/77 6. F~EE Beg ,lq, Bostrom discussed the present st~%e of the Free Bts. fie cannot hand!e super~[slon alon~., and ~11 be getting no help f~m voluntee~ from the force this year. Free B~s is usually ~trom presented the Comm. ~th the idea of t~ng over the Free B's or helping find interested volunteers for supe~sors. Eventually, ~ul~ like to see ~ds collected tu ~re ~a~nt help ~d ex~d n~ber ~of ~ghts open. Tho~ht ~.11 be given to this~ and con,Ct ~de 'to P~k u~tiy Se~ces for their consideration. Meeting wac adjourned at 8:00 ,j ENVIROk~4ENTAL REVIEW RECORD THREE POINTS PARK Mound, Minnesota, 55364 SECTION I. II. III. APPENDIX I II III IV V C(INTENTS Project Description Ae Purpose of project Status of project Project and Area description 1. Physical description 2. Social and aesthetic description 3. Physical environment 4. Social sn~ aesthetic environment Environmental Assessment A. Environmental Impacts and Assessment of Si§nificance 1. Physical (Natural) environment 2. Physical (Man-made) environment 3. Social environment Aesthetic environment B. Short-term and Lon§-term Comparisons: Irreversable and Irretrievable commitment of resources C. Project Modifications Desi§ned to Attenuate or Minimize Ham Alternatives A. No Project B. Size, desi~n and land use alternative Co Alternative sites D° Analysis of alternatives Findin§ A. Analysis of Review Board B. Documentation required by 58o16 Objections received about the project Issues raised by other aDencies Notice required by 58.30 (a) Request required by 58°30 (b) Certification required by 58.30 (c) SECTI@~ I PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Purpose of project: Three Points Park is located in the midst of residential area. The park was established and developed in the 1930's and serves as a central meeting place o£ neighborhood parents and children. Three Points Park is proposed to be improved by the neighborhood and City Park Commission. B. Status of Project: The proposed improvements of Three Points Park were chosen by the City'C~Un~i% upon the recommendation of the Park Commission and neighborhood residents. The City Engineers have designed a drainage system for the existing park site. In addition, the neighborhood road work and street paving is expected to be completed by the end of Summer 1979. C. Project and Area Description: Three Points Park is located northeast of the City of Mound within the boundries of Gull Lane, Wren Road and Three Points Blvd. in the midst of a residential area. The neighborhood park consists of Lots 1 through 10, Block 8, Lots 1,2,3 and 7 through 11, of Block 9, in the Linden Heights Addition. Also, the park includes Lots 9 and 10, Block 16 in Shadywood Point including the Wenonah Road and the vaca- tion of Meadow Lane. (Exhibit I) The proposed park improvements will include retention of trees and the natural vegation will exist as a buffer to the residential community. Since the nei9hborhood park is mainly accessible by pedestrian, bicycle and automobile traffic, the proposed park improvements will provide a closer kinship among residents. The residents and the Park Commission will plan and monitor the proposed improvements of drainage, physical layout and installation of new equip- ment. The park improvements will enhance the proposed Bike-Hike Trails System as a resting place and recreational destination. A detailed drainage system has been prepared by the Public Works Department to alleviate the water problem. There are no further site alterations proposed for Three Points Park. (Exhibit II and III) SECTICN II ENVIRON~NT k~SESS~ENT Environmental Impact and Assessment of Significance 1. Physical (Natural) Environment: A and B - Land and Water 1. Impact of the Environment on the Project: The existin§ drainage problem, sub-standard physical layout and delapitated equipment affect the functional use of Three Points Park. 2. Impact of the Project on the Equiument: The existing drainage will be improved but will not si9- nificantly affect the environment. C mhd D - Air and Noise Air quality will not be affected by the proposed project. Noise will have no affect on the natural environment. 2. Physical (Man-made) Environment A. Physical Character 1. Impact of the Environment on the Project: The existing physical environment consists of surrounding streets and housin9. These facilities would have little affect on the project except as an access route and as park participant provides. 2. .Impact of the Project on the Enviro~ent: It is possible the proposed park improvements will have an impact on the continued residential development of the The park is comparable with , Park Commission plans and Zonin§ Ordinances. B. Infrastructural: 1. Impact of the Environment on th~ Project: SECTION II ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT continued: Power lines are accessible and the streets will provide access to the park. Traffic on surrounding streets is substantial but has little effect on the park. 2. Impact of the Project on the Environment: The catch basins which are being installed to alleviate the drainage problem will increase the load on the storm sewer system. However, the runoff from the drainage sys- tem has already been calculated in our storm sewer system which has a 20 year storm capacity. 3. Social Environment Ae Community Facilities: .Impact of the Environment on the Project: The existing social environment has adequate access to a park system for either recreation or leisure time activities. The environment does effectively use the park as a meetin9 place for neighborhood residents and children. .Impact of the Project on the Enviro~aent: The improved park will enhance the existing City Park System and promote a closer kinship among the neighbor- hood in plannin9 the physical layout of the park. B. Character of the Community: Three Points Park will enrich the character of the Com- munity by providing for a cohesive neighborhood bond. Aesthetic Environment A. General: 1. Impact of the Environment on the Project: The existing drainage proble~ is the one aesthetically unpleasant area. The draina§e will be improved'simul- taneously to an ongoin9 street paving program. 2. Impact of the Project on the Environment: The improvements to Three Points Park will improve the environment. SECTION II ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT continued: Internal Relationship in the Project Not applicable C. Short Term and Long Term Comparisons: The construction effects upon the ares will include: Traffic disruption due to drainage improvements under the road. A short term sewer overload until drainage im- provements sr¢ completed. The long term effects will be an improved quality of life. No ~dverse long term effects 8re foreseen. D. Pro3ec% Modification Designed to Alleviate or Minimize Harm No pro3ect modification are seen ss necessary. 137 SECTION III ALTERNATIVES A. No Project There ~re few if any ~dverse environmental impacts, the "No Project" alternative is not considered. B. Size, Design and Land Use Alternatives: The City has no altzrnatives for which the land could be intended. C. Alternative Sites The expansion of the existin9 park network and the cos% of land dictate the proposed improvements as the most feasible. D. ~.nalysis of Alternatives Not Applicable SECTION IV FINDING A. A.nalysis of Review Record The Environmental Review Record for Three Points Park, of the City of Mound has been completed and found to have no si§nificant effect on the quality of the environment. Therefore, this notice of find- ing of no si§nificant effect is instrumented: B. Documentation Required by 58.15 LLK The project known ss Three Points Park of the City of Mound, con- sisting of Lots 1 throuuh 10, Block 8, Lots 1,2,3 and 7 through 11, Block 9, in the Linden Heights Addition. Also, the park includes Lots 9 and 10, Block 16 in Shadywood Point, includin9 the Wenonah Road and the vacation of Meadow Lane. The park improvements have been chosen by the City Council, considerin9 the recommendation 8nd studies of the Park Advisory Commission and the neighborhood citizen's group. There will be no significant affect on the environment for the fol- lowing reasons: Extensive plannin9 by the Park Advisory Commission and the desires of the citizens has established the need for improve- ments st Three Points Park. e Three Points Park is beneficial in terms of safety for the children of the neighborhood, recreational benefits for both children and adults, better utilization of local 9overnment land holdings, reduced congestion 8nd parking problems at various destinations of recreation, conservation of national petroleum resources, and building of a more physically fit community. No further environmental review of this project is proposed to be conducted and the City of Mound, Mound, Minnesota, 55364 intends to request HUD to release funds for this project. Comments may be submitted to the City of Mound until Wednesday, September 14, 1977. COMMON · / I0 2'1- '" 2O ~ . 9 ~0 ii 14 Ig /- 3 16 ,o . 13 WtCETONKA 9 i;,' : . l ' 8 ,/~ " / 6 -~ ' "' :" _.:~ -._ :...,,,.,. · ,,~ ---4 .... "~ EXHIBIT 1 7140 ~ 6570 COMMON MINNETONKi~ 5250 610. 1117 800 EXHIBIT II CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 19, 1977 TO: FROM~ SUB JEC~T' City Manager, Leonard L. Kopp Public Works Deoartment Three Points Park Drainage System The improved drainage system for Three Points Park will comprise a straight line layout from Three Points Blvd. south across the park to Wren Road. The layout includes a 15 inch pipe. catch basins, manhole j outlet struc- ture and surface restoration Preliminary costs are' 4 Catch basins, castings, covers- installed @ $550.00 each $2,200.00 1 Manhole installed @ $550. O0 each 550. O0 1 Outlet structure installed @ $600. O0 each 600. O0 550 ft 15 inch pipe installed @ $12. O0 per foot 6,600.00 Surface restoration (grading, fill & sod) 4,500.00 Contingency @ 10% 1,446.00 Total $15,908.00 Exhibit III 3OO 301 311 312 314 399 5OO 502 504 510 516 526 546 551 556 561 563 565 571 575 5?6 598 599 6OO 611 612 613 698 12 CITY OF MCUND MUNICIPAL LI~UOP, FUND INCC ~,F ST,~T~ME NT JLL¥ 3i, 1977 CUFRENT PERIOD A~CUNT RATIO SATES LIQUOR $ 21,311 39.68 KINE 5,405 lO.Ob BEER 25,712 47.87 OTHER 1,281 2.39 TCT~L SAL~S $ 53,709 100.00 7 MONTHS Y :_ A F-T O-D ,.~T MOUNT ~AT 128,784 43.52 '37,273 i2.6C i24,097 41.94 5,753 ~.' S~ $ 295,907 lO0.OC COSTS OF SALSS $ 41,356 77.00 $ 227,84-8 TOTAL COSTS $ 41,356 77.00 GROSS P~OFIT $ 12,353 23.00 227,848 $ 68,059 EXPENSES S~!LAR I ES MANAGEk $ 1,400 2.61 SALARIES. SELLING 2,B9! .ADVERTISING OEPREC IAT ION 350 .65 INSURhNC~ 600 1.12 RENT 733 1.36 REPAIRS SUPPLI ES IAXES, AY~ULL CLEANING JANITOR ~ LAUNOkY ~UD I T UTILITIES 2~,1 .45 563 1.05 .... MI.SCELLAN EUUS ................. 92 .... .17 9,800 16,550 77.0C -/'7. Ou! 23.0C B 31 5: 5c.' 2,450 .83 4,836 1.6 5,S13 Z.OC! 245 . 0~i 1,83I .62: 211 .39 1,231 .42 52 .!0 139 130 .24 2,060 .70 48 .09 2,026 °66 851 TOTAL EXPENSES $ 6,811 12.68 OPERATING INCOM?. OR (L(]S$) $ 5,5Z~2 $ 51,815 17.5 16,244 OTHER INCOME INTEREST INCOME $ 194 INVENTORY VARIATICN 4,271 ~ISCELLANEDUS 34 855 271 17,%- TOTAL OTHER iNCC~ $ 4,499 !%:T I '-N,' !0, NC J,~i c $ 04! 5,300 21,544 ...**.***,.,...LAST C O.RR U>IT Pi',. P A~,I OUN T RAT t0 22~787 40.48 5, !35 9.12 26,877 47.V5 1,490 2. ~5 569289 100.00 ~3,343 77.C0 43,343 77.00 12,9~6 23.00 1,175 2,507 250 60O 562 35 194 418 158 130 827 121 076 870 Y~,R......., ....... Yq¢t. ~-TO-D AT E $~ M CLJFi t F./.T I 0 135, ~64 ~5.06 57, 3~9 1!2.42 121, ~31 40.$9 6, 387 2.i2 ~00,631 100.00 23!~ ~86 7~.00 231~ ~8& 7~.00 69~ i~5 23.00 35 26 61 5, c~31 2.09 $ 8,225 2.74 z,,. 45 16, 93.8 5.63 92 · 03 · 44 1~ 750 .58 1.07 4, 885 1.62 loG0 6,387 2.12 .24 1~ 013 .74 2~ 509 .83 634 .21 .28 524 .17 · ! 8 232 .08 · 23 I, 850 .62 1 .z~'7 1,963 .65 .21 607 .20 12.57 $ .49, 139 16.35 006 435 714 478 2~ 627 22,633 997 12 98 99 100 i04 106 110 112 132 139 140 159 161 163 169 199 CITY CF MCUND MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND BALANCE SHEET JULY 31, .1977 CURRENT ASSETS CASH Om HAN~ Cm. SH IN BANK iNVFS'fM~NTS INVENTORY P~.EP.~iO EXP~NS~sS ASSETS TDT,~L CUPREr~T ~SSSTS FIXEO ASSETS FURNITURE EQUIPHENT FIXTURES ~CCUlqUL/~T SO DEPRECIATICN LEASEHOLD I MPRO V~{ ~L,qTS ACCUMOLAT ED 0~. PRE £ i ~,T I LiN NET FIXED ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS · 1,845 78~289 27,200 B, 880 5,931 q0,089 25~967) 5,866 1,200} $ 186,085 18~788 $ 204.,873 r_p ~: ~- lk:-- T A CI". ~'! I tI',T T 'g C. 20O 201 203 205 210 220 239 280 282 298 299 997 31, 1977 P~G,~ 2 LIABILITIES AND E~UITY CURRPNT LIABIL'~ ~,IES ACCOU.~TS PAYAbLS TEAb~ $ 18~112 S~L~S T~X PAY~bL,~ 2~303 ~C£RU~D kXPENS£S 390 CASH OVER OR SHORT ( 58] TOTAL CU~R~::.~T LIABILITIES TOTAL LIABILITI FUNO 6ALANCE $ 165,355 TRANSFERS OUT ( 12t500) NET I{'~COM~ 21,54z~ SUSPE:ISE 9,728 $ 20,7q-7 $ 20~747 TOTAL EOUITY 18g, 12b TOTAL LIA$ILITIES AND EQUITY $ 2049873 3OO 301 311 312 313 314 399 401 498 499 5OO 5O2 5O4 510 516 526 546 551 556 561 563 565 571 575 576 59O 598 599 6O0 611 612 613 698 CITY OF MCUND MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FL It,iCONE SIAIEMSNI JUNE 30, 1977 6 MONTHS CURRENT PERIOD YEAR'TO-DATE A MOUNT R AT I 0 AMOUNT RAT I 0 S~LES LIOUOR $ 19,828 4-1.01 $ 107,473 44.31 WINS 5,341 11.05 31,868 13.1~ BEER 22~ 134 z~5.78 98~385 40.62 OTHER 1,050 7.17 4,4,72 1.8~ _cqsT S ..oE... ,SA kEs ......................................... TOTAL COSTS GROSS PROFIT TOTAL SALES $ 48~ 353 100.00 $ 242,198 100.0¢ $ 37,232 77.00 $ 186,492 77.00 ~ ...... 11,12~ 23 .oo $ 5 5,'?og .......... 2~jo( E X P ~NS.E S ....................................... SALARIES MANAGER SAL~RI ES, SELLING ADVERT ISING DEPREC I~T ION INSURANCE RENT REPAIRS SUPPLIES TAXES, PAYROLL CLEANING JANI¥3R & LAUNDRY TR~.VEL AUDIT UTILITIES MISCELL&NEOUS TOTAL EXPENSES 1, z~O0 2.90 $ 8, z~O0 3.;~7 2,619 5.42 1~159 5.8-~ 3~0 '~7Z Z' i® ,'8~ 600 1.24 4m236 1.75 575 1.19 5,180 2.14 20 .04 245 .10 429 .89 1,590 .66 ......... 605 ~ 1&25 ........ 3,320 1,737 155 .32 1~020 .~2 10 .02 87 .04 1,100 2.27 1,930 .8{3 286 .59 1~978 .82 92 .19 759 .31 8,241 17.OZ~ $ z~5 ~ OOZ~ .3PE~ATING INCOME OR (LoSs) $ ....... 2,(380 .... $ 10,702 ................ OTHER INCOME INTEREST INCOME IMVENTORY VARIATION MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL OTHER INCOME NET INCOME $ 47 $ 661 32 $ 79 '$ "2' 959 ...... !~,o ............ $ 801 $' 11,503 ..... GREE K~-T ACCOUNTING C U?.~ ENT PERIOD AMOUNT RATIO YEAR YEAR-TO-DATE AMOUNT RATIO $ $ $ $ $ 20~ 4~87 4-2.01 22~176 45°47 1~ 195 2 ~8~ 766 100. CO' 'BT~ 550 77.00 ~7~ 550 77. O0 11~ 216 112,677 46.11 32, 21~ 13.18 9~,? 55~ B8.70 z~, 897 2 .OD 2z,~.~ 3~.2 100.00 !8B~ 1~3 77.00 188, 1~3 77.00 56~ 199 23.00 $ $ 175 2.41 5~'8 5.22 250 .51 600 1.23 582 1o19 85 .17 28 . £6 121 .25 17z, .36 130 .27 4~. .09 74 .15 5~ 811 ll.~Z 405 050 2 431 5 92 500 .61 285 1.75 825 2.38 495 819 .34, 091 .86 634 .26 133 .05 720 .70 136 ~.Sb .20 063 136 17.21 400 1,714 452 2,566 7,971 400 714- 452 566 702 I 12 98 99 100 106 1,10 112 124 IBc9 140 158 159 161 16B 169 199 CITY OF MOUND MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND BALANCE SHEET JUNE BO, 1977 CURRENT ASSETS CASH ON HAND Ca, SH IN BAFIK IN VESTMENTS LOAN TO GENERAL FUND INVENTORY PREPAID EXPENSES ASSETS TOT~,L CURRENT ASSETS FIXED ASSETS FURNITURE EQUIPMENT FIXTURES ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION NET FIXED ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,8~5 79t258 27t200 B~880 66~866 6tSB1 40~089 25,717! 5~866 1,100) $ 185~580 19~138 $ 20~718 GREEN-T ACCOUNTING /,~ ~-.,-' 8ZL~O~ EEg~Z~ $ $ 08L ~08~5~ ON~ AilflO_q ONV ~.~IIIlI8¥I] l~lOi ~WOONI lf]O ~ 3N'~'IVQ ONfl~ $-]I£I]ISVI1 IN~R~. l~lCl S~ Il I1 18¥ I1 I,~OHS ~0 *'~AO HS~D SBSN_-]dX~ O~R'dDD~ 66Z OTZ GOZ £0~ IOZ OOZ Li6l *OE qNRR ZI L66 DEPARTMENT TO : FROM : SUBJECT: STATE OF~JINNESOTA Legislators, County and City Officials, Watershed Districts, and Soil & Water DATE:,~gust 5, Conservation Districts . ~ Director Division of Waters 1977 PROPOSED RULES CONTAINING STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR GRANTING 'AND DENYING PERMITS TO' CHANGE THE COURSE, CURRENT, AND CROSS-SECTION OF PUBLIC WATERS This is to inform you that public hearings will be held before an independentstate hearing examiner on September 7, 1977 at 9:30 A.M. in the Auditorium (Room 83) of the State Office Building in St. Paul and on September 21, 1977 at 9:30 A.M. in the Armory, Sth and Laurel Streets, Brainerd. The purpose of the hearings will be to receive testimony from any interested party concerning the above referenced rules pursuant to Minn. Statutes 1976, Chapter 10S ~x~-~--~- In addition to the public hearings, informational meetings will be held statewide to explain the proposed rules con- ~ AU~ ~;'~-:~ taining the standards and criteria, and receive informal comments and suggestions pertaining to them ......... The informational meetings ~ill be held at the following locations, dates, and times. LOCATION DATE TIME BEMIDJI - Bemidji State University Student Center Ballroom August 15, 1977 7:50 P.M. DULUTH - UMD, Life Science Building Room 175 August 16, 1977 7:50 P.M, BRAINERD - Community College College Dr. at SW 4th St. Little Theater August 17, 1977 7:30 P.M. NEW ULM - DNR Regional Office Highway 15 South August 25, 1977 7:30 P.M. ROCHESTER - DNR Regional Office .August 24, 1977 2300 Silver C.~ee - --~ ........ .. - Tech.'~~cational Institute August 25, 1977 Aud~orium, 235 b~rshall Ave. 7:30 P.M. 1:00 P.M. and~ 7:00 ~ Cop~s of the proposed rules will be available upon request to this office and will be available at the information meetings and public hearings. Enclosed is a copy of the' table of contents which outlines the types of permits ~hich are discussed. Please note that activities not P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 I~OARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Pres. · H. Dale Palmatier · Albert L. Lehman ,, James S. Russell · Jean WiUiam$ August 19, 1977 LAKE MINNETONKA WATERSHEO B OUND)~R~f / Mr. Bradley K. Cosby 12810 Nicollet Avenue South Condo 301 Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 Re: Permit Application No. 77-99 Location: Black Lake of Lake Minnetonka, Mound Purpose: Lake Setback Variance Dear Mr. Cosby: At its meeting on August 18, 1977 the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District reviewed the subject permit application. It approved the permit as requested with the following condition: 1. All work shall conform to the requirements of the City of Mound. Permits are valid for one year. Please contact us at 473-4224 when the project is about to commence so an inspector may view the work in Progress. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES E. A. Hickok, P.E. EAH/cml cc: D. Cochran - MCWD R. Harnack - DNR G. Macomber - MCWD F. Mixa - LMCD ~. Heyman - Mound P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran. ~ree. - H. Dale Palmatier · Albert L Lehman · James S. Russell o Jean Williams August 19, 1977 Mr. Werner W. Weisser 1840 Shorewood Lane Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Permit Application No. 77-100 Location: West Arm Bay of Lake Minnetonka, Mound Purpose: Lake Setback Variance Dear Mr. Weisser: At its meeting on August 18, 1977 the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District reviewed the subject permit application. It approved the permit as requested with the following condition: 1. All work shall conform to the requirements of the City of Mound. Permits are valid for one year. Please contact us ak 473-4224 when the project is about to commence so an inspector may view the work in progress. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District E. A. Hickok, P.E. EAH/cml cc: D. Cochran - MCWD R. Harnack - DNR [ Macomber - MCWD F. Mixa - LMCD Heyman - Mound P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Pres. · H. Dale Palmatier · Albert L Lehman - James S. Russell · Jean Williams LAKE MIHHETON~A WATEflSHEB BOUNI)ARY' / OTA ~IYER August 19, 1977 Mr. R. S. Kinghorn James Refrigeration Company 3948 W. 50th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota Re: Permit Application No. 77-94 Location: Lafayette Park, Mound Purpose: Debris Clean-Up Dear Mr. Kinghorn: At its meeting on August 18, 1977 the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District reviewed the subject permit application. It approved the permit as requested with the following condition: 1. All work shall conform with the enclosed Grading and Drainage Guidelines. Permits are valid for one year. Please contact us a~ 473-4224 when the project is about to commence so an inspector may view the work in progress. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District E. A. Hickok, P.E. EAH/cml Enclosure - Grading and Drainage Guidelines cc: D. Cochran - MCWD R. Harnack - DNR B[ Macomber - MCWD F. Mixa - LMCD Heyman - Mound MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT August 18, 1977 The meeting was called to order on August 18, 1977, by Chairman Cochran at 7:30 p.m. at the Wayzata City Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota. Managers present: Cochran, Lehman, Palmatier and Williams'~..~ Manager absent: Russell Also present were board advisors Hickok and Macomber. ~Appro. val of Minutes. The minutes of the regular meeting of July 21, 1977, were reviewed. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Cochran, that the minutes be approved. Upon vote, the motion carried. C. A. Bergstrand, 27100 Edgewood Road - Shorewood Riprap Repairs; Application No. 77-92 · The engineer reviewed the.application~of Mr. Bergstrand to install approximately 30 feet of shoreline riprap. The engineer recommended approval subject, to the standard conditions of the Water- shed District for placement of riprap.~ ~Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Palmatier, that the application be ap- proved subject to the standard conditions of the district for the placement of riprap. Upon vote, the motion carried. Lake Minnetonka Homes, Inc. - St. Albans Green, Second Addition, St. Albans Bay of Lake Minnetonka - Greenwood; Installation of. Sanitary Sewer~System,~ Upgrading~of..Existing. Water~System,~ ~on~.~ struction of Street; Application No. 77-93 The engineer r~viewed the.application for installation of sanitary sewer, upgrading water system and street construction, and indicated that the work was to be done pursuant to plans and speci- fications prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc. The engineer recom- mended approval of the application as submitted. Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Palmatier, that the application be approved as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote, the motion carried. August 18, 1977.~.~.<~ ~ ? Page Two '~'? t ~'. ~ ~/\~'? James Refrige~atio~"Company - Lafayette Park in Mound; Debris Cleanup; Application .No. :7-7-:94 ' :: .-: : ::. The engineer reviewed the application to fill a portion of the property with compactible material for debris cleanup. The engi- neer recommended approval of the application as submitted. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Palmatier, that the application be approved as recommended by the engineer. UPon vote, the motion carried. City of Mound - Intersection of Grandview Boulevard and County Road 15; Storm Sewer Construction; Application No. '77-95 The engineer reviewed the application of the City of Mound for storm sewer construction and recommended approval of the appli- cation as submitted. Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Palmatier, that the application be approved as recom- mended by the engineer. Upon vote,.the motion carried. 'Diamond Lake Restoration Project; East Diamond Lake Road at Portland Avenue South in Minneapolis; Lake Improvements; ~p!ication No. 77-96 · Marvin Borrell appeared on behalf of the Diamond Lake Restoration project in connection with a dredging permit appli- cation submitted to the district. Following discussion, it was generally agreed that the permit application was premature and the applicant withdrew the application. Following extensive discussion, the managers reaffirmed their support for the pro- posed project in concept and the conclusion previously reached by the managers at the regular meeting of April~ 21, 1977, that since the Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board was the owner of the property, that body would be the likely applicant for initiating an improvement of this type. The managers authorized the engineer to set a meeting to occur at the site of the propos- ed project with appropriate representatives of the Minneapolis Park Board,~the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the mana- gers in order to apprise the appropriate officials of these agencies of the nature of the proposed project. City of Minnetonka; DraiD~ge Swale Between Lake Shore Boulevard and Gray's Ba~; Storm Sewer Drainage Swale; Application No. 77-97 The engineer reviewed the application of the City of Minnetonka to construct a storm sewer drainage swale and recom- mended approval of the application as submitted. Following dis- cussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Palmatier, that the application be approved as submitted. Upon vote the motion carried. .August 18, 1977. Page Three Bradley K. Cosby; Black Lake of Lake Minnetonka; Mound; Lake ''Setback; Owner's House JDeck; Appl. ication No.' '77-99 The engineer reviewed the application of Mr. Cosby to construct a deck on his residence to within approximately 48 feet of the natural ordinary high water level of Lake Minnetonka. The applicant was present and advised the managers that the Mound Planning Commission and City Council have approved the variance. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Palmatier, that the variance be granted. Upon vote, the motion carried. Werner W. Weisser; West Arm Bay of Lake Minnetonka; Mound; Lake Setback; Owner's Porch; Two Feet; Application No.. 77-10,0 The .engineer reviewed the application for a varianc~ from the Watershed District's lakeshore setback requirement for conStruc- tion of a porch encroaching approximately 2 feet within the district's setback requirements. The engineer recommended approval of the appli- cation as submitted. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Palmatier, that the application be approved as submitted. Upon vote, the motion carried. North Shore Marina Dredging; Maxwell Bay~of Lake Minnetonka; .' Orono; Application No. 77-101 The engineer reviewed the application of North Shore Marina for dredgin9 of the commercial marina operated by the applicant. Mr. Steve Emming appeared on behalf of the appli-' cant and reviewed the application~with the managers. Mr. ' ' Emming advised the managers that the applicant has received DNR and Corps of Engineers permits for the dredgin9 proposed and that the DNR dredging permit prohibits dredging~below'.elevation' 924.6 MSL. The engineer advised the managers that the Orono planning commission has not formally acted on the application but that the zoning administrator of the City of Orono had re- quested that the managers act on-the application in advance of Orono Plannin9 Commission and City. Council. action, in-light of the fact that the next regular meeting of the managers would not occur untilI mid-September&.. The. engineer~.recommended~ approval.i offs;- the application. Following discussion, it was moved by Palmatier, seconded by Lehman, that .the application be approved as recommend- ed by the engineer subject'to approval~ of the application by the City of Orono in the same form as submitted by the applicant to the Watershed District. Upon vote, the motion carried. Augus~ 18, 1977 Page Four James K. McCleary; Stubbs Bay Marina; Dredging Application; Orono; Application .No.: :77-98 : : :... The engineer advised %he managers %hat he had had no communication from the officials of the City of Orono with re- spect to acting on this application in advance of review by the City of Orono in the customary manner. It was moved by Lehman, seconded by Williams, that the application be tabled. Upon vote, the motion carried. Marc W. Arneson; Minnetonka Motel; 15818 Wayzata Boulevard; minn~tonka; Wetlands Fill; Renewal of Permit No.' 76-'20 ~%e engineer reviewed the application to renew an exist- ing fill permit originally issued by the district in 1976. The engineer recommended approval. Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Palmatier, that the application be approved as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote, the motion carried. Grading at "stone Ridge Trace"; Minnetonka Doug Goriesky, consulting engineer on behalf of %he dev- eloper of Stone Ridge Trace, appeared before the managers and ad- vised the managers that grading had been undertaken by the devel- oper outside the right-of-way for road construction prior .to sub- mission-of a permit application to the district. Mr. Goriesky stated that he had contacted the district's engineer as soon as he became aware of this situation, and was proceeding to insti- tute interim measures at the request of the district's engineer. Mr. Goriesky further indicated that the developer would submit a permit application promptly. Hennepin Count. y Well -Lake Minnetonka Association The engineer reviewed-the history and. present status of the groundwater wells previously operated by Hennepin County and later transferred to the district. Mr. Stan Kinghorn of the Lake Minnetonka Association indicated his view that additional informa- tion regarding the possible utilization of the existing wells should be secured by an appropriate public body. President Cochran expressed the general interest 'of the Board of Managers in explor- ing the matter to determine what would be involved in evaluating the possibility of utilizing the existing wells. President Cochran expressed the appreciation of the managers for the report made by Mr. Kinghorn. Treasurer's RePort Manager Palmatier distributed the treasurer's monthly administrative fund report, a copy of which is attached hereto. Following discussion, it was moved by Palmatier, seconded by Cochran that the report be approved and the bills paid as set August 18, 1977 Page Five forth in that report except to reduce the amount paid to the district engineer by $380.36. Upon vote the motion carried. Manager Palmatier then distributed the treasurer's monthly EPA Grant Fund report, a copy of which is attached hereto. Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Cochran, that the report be approved and the bills paid as set forth in that report. Upon vote, the motion carried. French Lake Retention Project The managers noted receipt of a lette 1977,.from the. Department ofoNatural~Resources, ments with regard to the~ proposed-French'~'~ake.~R The managers further noted for the record that the proposed French Lake Retention Basin was di managers at a meeting at the Metro Region headq ~ dated July 26, ~o ffering~ corn- ._ ~e matter of cussed by the' uarters of the Department of Natural Resources on August 1, 1977. The meet- ing was requested by the Department of Natural Resources, and was attended by Managers Cochran', Lehman and Russell, as well as board advisors Hickok, Holmquist and MacOmber. The managers noted that no present reponse to the letter from the Department of Natural Resources was required, pending further action by the City of Orono regarding this proposed project. DNR Proposed Rules for Work in Public Waters, Including Dredging The attorney reported that the Department of Natural~ Re- sources has published draft regulations establishing, standards.,and criteria for granting permits for work in public waters, including dredging, and he distributed copies to the managers. The attorney noted that the department has 'scheduled a public', informational .' meeting on August 25, 1977, and a public hearing on the proposed rules to commence September 7, 1977. Following discussion of the need for the district to carefully review the rules and submit comments to the DNR and the short amount of time available, the managers directed the .attorney to request that the DNR hold the hearing record open for 90 days after September 7, 1977, for review and comment.. DNR Municipal Water ApprDpriation Permits ~ Manager Lehman noted the receipt of DNR.water appropri- ation permits for the Cities of Hopkins and Long Lake. Following discussion, the engineer was directed to review the permits to determine whether the response from the district was required. Headwaters Control Structure The managers noted for the record that the matter of the headwaters control structure was discussed at a meeting with the Department of Natural Resources' personnel at the Department of August 18, 1977 Page Six Natural Resources Metro Region headquarters on August 1, 1977. The meeting was requested by the Department of Natural Resources and was attended by Managers Cochran, Lehman and Russell, as well as board advisors Hickok, Holmquist and Macomber. The meeting concerned questions raised by the DNR in its letter of May 3, 1977, concerning the proposed headwaters control structure and the procedure that would be followed by the DNR to hold a public hear- ing on the proposed headwaters control structure, located at the Gray's Bay dam site. Mr. Harnack of the DNR advised the managers that development of the management policy for operation of the structure was necessary prior to commencement of public hearings on the proposed project. %'he attorney reported that he had been advised by Mr. Harnack that the department had requested its attorneys to set a date for a public hearing on the proposed project but that as of the present date, no date had been set. The engineer reviewed with the managers a draft proposed operating policy which he had prepared after the August 1, 1977 meeting with the DNR. Following extensive discussion, the managers directed the attorney and the engineer to coordinate redrafting of the proposed operating policy to state the water management objec- tives sought .to be accomplished by the project. After redrafting, the draft policy is to be provided to the Department of Natural Resources, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, the Lake Minnetonka Association and all other interested persons and groups for review and comment. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Annual Conference for Public Officials President Cochran reported that he and the engineer had attended the Annual Conference for Public Officials sponsored by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, Sunday, August 14, 1977. Lake Virginia Restoration Pro~ec.t. President Cochran stated that he had received a call from an EPA representative inquiring with respect to certain aspects of the Lake Virginia restoration project. President Cochran directed the engineer to investigate the matter and respond to the inquiry. Adjournment There being no further business to come before the meeting, Chairman Cochran declared the meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted, H. Dale Palmatier, Secretary