Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
1985-06-25126
June 25, 1985
MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
JUNE 25, 1985
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on June 25, 1985, at 7:30 P. M. in the Council
Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Acting Mayor Russell Peterson,
Councilmembers Phyllis Jessen, Gary Paulsen and Steve Smith.
Mayor. Polston was absent and excused. Also present w ere: City
Manager Jon Elam, City Attorney Jim Larson, City Engineer John
Cameron, City Planner Mark Koegler and City Clerk Fran Clark; and
the following interested citizens: Jeff Borns, Bill Gilbertson,
Tom Ptacek, Clyde Wallin, Emily Braaten, Cheryl Grand, H. R. Van
Zanten, Larry Connelly, Jr., James Bedell.
Acting Mayor Peterson opened the meeting and welcomed the people
in attendance.
The Minutes from the June 11, 1985, Regular Council Meeting were
presented for consideration.
Councilmember Smith stated that he would like page 113, the last
sentence in the first paragraph to be amended. There was
discussion on how. it should be amended. The following was
decided by the Council, delete the last sentence and insert the
following: 'rThe plans dated May 15, 1985, labeled A-1 and A-2,
which include only the 3 changes as referred to in the Minutes of
the May '21, 1985, Meeting, are now incorporated into_the
resolution.~~
MOTION made by Councilmember Paulsen, seconded by
Councilmember Smith to approve the Minutes of the June 11,
1985, Regular Meeting, as amended above. The vote Was
4 in favor with Mayor Polston being absent and excused.
Motion carried.
The Minutes from the June 11, 19$5, Reconvened Board of Review
were presented for consideration.
MOTION made by Councilmember Paulsen, seconded by
Councilmember Jessen to approve the Minutes of the June 11,
1985, Reconvened .Board of Review as presented. The vote was
4 in favor with Mayor Polston absent and excused. Motion
carried.
127
June 25, 1985
PUBLIC HFARING• DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS FOR JUNE
The City Manager stated that the reduced delinquent figure is now
$2 , 492.84 .
Acting Mayor Peterson opened the Public Hearing and asked if
there was anyone present who wished to speak with regard to a
delinquent utility bill.
JEFF BORNS, owner of 3136 Westedge Blvd. stated that his
tenant had not paid the bill and was responsible for it. The
Council explained to Mr. Borns that the utility bill for
sewer and water stays with the property and he would have to
take his tenant to court to collect the bill, but in the
meantime if he did not want the water shut-off he would have
to pay the delinquent amount of $143.42•
Peterson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #85-76 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT
UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,492.84
AHD AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT-OFF
WATER SERVICE FOR THOSE ACCOUNTS
The vote was 4 in favor with Mayor Polston absent and excused.
Motion carried.
H
The City Manager explained that the applicant is applying for a
variance to allow the construction of a 380 square foot, 24 foot
by 16 foot addition to the dwelling with sideyard setbacks of
between 9 to 13 feet to the west property line. The existing
structure has a nonconforming 13.67 foot setback at the closest
point to the front property line. `This property has road on 3
sides. The Planning Commission has recommended approval due to
the shape of the lot and the addition will allow the owner to
bring the floor area of the dwelling up to the minimum allowable.
Paulsen moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #85-77 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO
RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING
SETBACK FOR LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 10, THE
HIGHLANDS, PID #23-117-24 42 0043
The vote was 4 in favor with Mayor Polston absent and excused.
Motion carried.
128
June 25, 1985
CASE #85-427: JAHES E_ BEDELL, FOR LOT 8, BLOCK 1~ SHADYWOOD
POINT, LOT WIDTH ~ AREA VARIANCE
The City Manager showed the Council a map that was done on the
properties in Shadywood Point. In Block 1 there are 10 parcels
of property. Of those 10, 6 are nonconforming in lot area and
width for the R-1 zoning. Of the 68 parcels in the area at the
end of the point which are R-1 , 36 are nonconforming in lot area
or lot width, and 32 are conforming. The Planning Commission
recommended approval.
Mr. Bedell was present and stated that he feels this property
meets all 6 criteria for obtaining a variance as stated in
Section 23.506.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Councilmember Jessen stated that normally she w ould not vote for
this variance, but in looking at the lots around this one it
would appear that a variance should be granted for conformity.
She indicated that the zoning of R-1 may be incorrect for this
area.
Councilmember Peterson stated that he is not for this variance
because it is 27~ and could seta precedent. He stated he felt
we need to be consistent in rulings on variances. He then asked
Mr. Bedell how long he has owned this lot. Mr. Bedell stated not
that long. Mr. Bedell further stated that the house on Lot 9 was
built in 1979 and was granted a variance in area just as he is
asking for. He stated he has talked to the surrounding neighbors
and they. do not care if he builds on this lot.
There was discussion on rezoning this area of Shadywood Point so
that it is in conformity with the dwellings that exist. R-1 at
10,000 lot area and a 60 foot lot really does not fit where the
lots are almost all 50 feet wide and less than 10,000 square
feet. So it was felt that the area should be looked at for
rezoning because it may have been incorrectly zoned to begin
with. Councilmember Peterson stated that he would support a
rezoning before supporting this variance.
Smith moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #85-78 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE IN LOT
WIDTH AND AREA FOR LOT 8, BLOCK 1,
SHADYWOOD POINT, PID #18-117-23 31 0002
(200 SHOREWOOD LANE)
The City Attorney stated that he thinks findings for granting
the variance should be incorporated in the resolution. The
Council agreed to the following being incorporated into the
resolution:
1. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances due to
existing sites in close proximity to it.
129
June 25 , 1985
2. Out of the 60 some parcels in that area, 30 some are
either nonconforming in lot area or are nonconforming in
lot w idth.
3. The adjoining property had a variance approved in 1979.
4. The variance requested is the minimum variance which
would alleviate the hardship.
5. That special conditions or circumstances do not result
from the actions of the applicant.
6. The applicant will adhere to all setbacks when building.
NOTION made by Councilmember Jessen, seconded by
Councilmember Smith to add the findings above to the proposed
Resolution #85-78• The vote Was 3 in favor with
Councilmember Peterson voting nay and Mayor Polston being
absent and excused. Motion carried.
The vote on the original Resolution #85-78 was 3 in favor with
Councilmember Peterson voting nay and Mayor Polston being absent
and excused. Motion carried.
MOTION made by Council member Smith, seconded by Councilmember
Jessen directing the Planning Commission to look at the area
on Shadywood Point which is zoned R-1 and see if it should be
rezoned to R-2 to be more in conformance with the lots that
exist. The vote was 4 in favor with Mayor Polston absent and
excused. Motion carried.
CASE #85-428: RICHARD ~ JOAN AHMANI~ 2017 ARBOR LANE, LOT ~,.
SKARP ~ LINDQUISTtS RAVENSWOOD, VARIANCE TO
RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING SETBACK
The City Manager explained that the applicant has applied for a
variance to allow structural alterations, an attached 23 by 24
foot, and a roof line change. The existing structure has a
setback to the side yard of 3 feet. The Planning Commission has
reviewed the request and recommends the variance to recognize the
existing nonconforming side yard setback upon the condition that
a registered land survey be submitted prior to the construction
of the garage addition.
Paulsen moved and Smith seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #85-79 RESOLUTION
RECOGNIZE
SETBACK FOR
RAV ENSH OOD,
ARBOR LANE)
TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO
AH EXISTING NONCONFORMING
LOT 3, SKARP & LINDQUIST~S
PID #13-117-24 41 0002, (2017
The vote was 4 in favor with Mayor Polston adsent and excused.
Motion carried.
130
June 25, 1985
CASE #85-429- HAROLD R VAN ZANTEN} 2001 LAKESIDE LANE, LOT 1~.,.
BLOCK 10, SHADYWOOD POINT, SIDE YARD VARIANCE &
RECOGNIZE NONCONFORMING SETBACKS
The City Manager explained that a variance has been applied for
to allow the construction of a 20 foot by 25 foot, 10 inch deck
and porch addition to the dwelling with side yards of 6 feet and
front yard of 24 feet. The Planning Commission has recommended
approval.
Jessen moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #85-80 RESOLUTION TO APFROVE A VARIANCE TO
RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING
SETBACK FOR LOT 13, BLOCK 10, SHADYWOOD
POINT, PID #18-117-23 32 0022, (2001
LAKESIDE LANE)
The vote was 4 in favor with Mayor Polston absent and excused.
Motion carried.
BEACHWOOD ROAD POND REPORT - JOHN CAMERON
The Gity Engineer explained that the existing storm sewer system,
which discharges into the pond in question, was constructed as
part of the 1978 Street Improvments. Upon completion of this
system a significant difference was noted in the high water
elevation of the pond after heavier rains. Ta eliminate that
problem a 12" overflow storm sewer was installed from the
existing catch basin in Beachwood through an easement on the
John's property to Lake Langdon. If the overflow is working the
pcnd should stay at a fairly constant level, with only heavy
rains or quick thaws causing it to raise, but the level should
recede fairly fast. This Spring debris was restricting the flow s
though the catch basins to the overflow pipe, when the water
tower was emptied. It has since been cleaned out and the water
receded to the elevation of the overflow pipe.
Residents Jerry Kust, Roland Flugum and Tom Ptacek were present
and all agreed that a 1 inch rain causes a 4 to 6 inch rise in
the pond and it takes 2 days to drain dow n. They further stated
that the pond never rose to this level until the storm sewer was
put in and there was no outlet at that time. Mr.Flugum stated
that Rustic and Garden used to run down to Lake Langdon and since
the roads were put in, it drains to the pond.
There was discussion on the elevations and possible damage to
property in the area of the pond.
The residents stated they would like to see a level of 966.7
maintained for the pond.
131
June 25 , 1 985
The City Engineer stated that the only sure method of maintaining
a lower level in the pond and to assure no flooding even in a 100
year storm would be to lower the overflow pipe in the pond. This
would involve relaying the pipe from the pond to a point on the
John property where the grade breaks and slopes steeply to Lake
Langdon. Their estimate for the cost of this is $19,000.
MOTION made by Councilmember Paulsen, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson directing the City Engineer to
continue to study this, see if there are other options to
alleviate the problem and get costs of those options. The
vote was 4 in favor with Hayor Polston absent and excused.
Motion carried.
PAISLEY ROAD EXTENSION REPORT
The City Engineer reported that they now have figured that the
cost for installing sewer and water, extending Paisley Road would
be estimated at $29,000. Mr. Forystek has proposed that the City
pay the cost of replacing the last 60 feet of the existing street
including engineering costs or approximately $4,600. The
remainder of the development cost of approximately $24,200. would
be paid 50~ in cash by the developer and 50~ assessed back to the
property. The City Engineer recommends that the City pay for
reconstructing the existing portion of Paisley Road, but Mr.
Forystek should be responsible for all engineering costs
associated with the project because if it were not for his
project the street would remain the same.
The City Attorney stated that the City cannot proceed on this
project until it has a petition from 100 of the property owners
to be assessed asking for this improvement. That petition would
then be validated by the City Attorney and then the project could
proceed.
Mr. Forystek asked if he could hire his own engineer and
contractor to do this project. The City Attorney state yes, but
he would have to abid by all the specifications of the City.
The Council took no action on this item.
SET DATES FOR CITY COUNCIL BOAT AND BUS TOURS IN JULY
MOTION made by Councilmember Jessen, seconded by
Councilmember Peterson to set July 16, 1985, at 6:30
P.H., for a boat trip to view the City Commons areas, etc.,
boat will leave from the Hound Bay Park Dock; and set July
30, 1985, at 6:30 P. M. for a bus trip around the City to look
at certain problems, etc., bus will leave from City Hall.
The vote was 4 in favor with Mayor Polston absent and
excused. Notion carried.
132
June 25, 1985
GES~~QNS FROM C
Acting Mayor Peterson asked if there was anyone present who
wished to address the Council.
Ms. Emily Braaten, 2001 Arbor Lane, was present and stated that
she is having a terrible problem with number of geese that have
invaded her property. The clean-up is more than she can handle
as an older person. She stated she would like the City to move
the geese somewhere else.
The City Clerk reported that she has spoken to the DNR and the
University of Minnesota. They have no crews available for this
year to move the geese and they felt the geese would be gone in
another week, when they get their feathers. The University does
have a program that the City could get into, but it would cost
the City $2,000 to $3,000 the first year and approximately $500
per year after that to control the population of the geese. It
is too late this year to get into this program as their crews are
already scheduled.
The Council sympathsized with Ms. Braaten's problem, but stated
the City does not have the personnel to handle this. They
decided to consider the. expense to control the goose population
when the Budget is considered.
The City Attorney stated that he has seen plastic swans set in
yards that scare the geese away and suggested that Ms. Braaten
try that.
Mr. Richard Ahmann, 2017 Arbor Lane, stated that he had seen the
City Manager's article in the paper on the Burlington Northern
abandoning the rail line and suggested that the Council take a
look at the area near Edgewater Drive where the railroad comes
thru for rezoning from B-2 to R-3 for a condominium project.
0
The Council thanked the citizens for their input.
REQUEST FOR "NO PARKING" SIGNS ON SUNRISE LANDING
The City Manager stated that Mr. Carl Anderson of 1754 Shorewood
Lane has reQuested that the City install "No Parking" signs on
each side of his driveway off of Sunrise Landing so that people
using the landing would not block his driveway.
The Council discussed this and decided that Mr. Anderson should
probably have been required to have his driveway come off of
Shorewood Lane when the street project was done and that it would
not take that much for him to have one installed. This would
also leave the landing for what it was intended which is a place
for people using the access to park or launch boats.
133
June 25, 1985
MOTION made by Councilmember Jessen, seconded by
Councilmember Paulsen to deny the request of Mr. Carl
Anderson, 175 Shorewood Lane, to install "No Parking" signs
on each side of his driveway off of Sunrise Landing. The
vote was 4 in favor with Mayor Polston absent and excused.
Motion carried.
Ot1nTATTONS FOR REPAIR OF STREET DAMAGE CAUSED BY HATERMAIN BREAKS
The City Manager reported that the City has received two
quotations for the repair of streets damaged because of watermain
breaks. They are as follows:
Buffalo Bituminous $ 9,820.25
Preferred Paving $ 15,401.88
The Staff is recommending Buffalo Bituminous be awarded the job.
MOTION made by Councilmember Peterson, seconded by
Councilmember Jensen to approve the bid of Buff alo Bituminous
in the amount of $9,$20.25, for repairing the streets
(Highland Blvd. and Hazelwood Lane) damaged by the Watermain
breaks. The vote was ~+ in favor with Mayor Polston being
absent and excused. Motion carried.
AFT DATE FOR PUBLIC HEA RING - ZONING AME NDMENT TO A LLOT ACCESSORY
APARTMENTS
The City Manager explained that the Planning Commission has been
working on this for about 6 months and has not yet come up with
anything. Mr. Kevin Norwood, the applicant who spawned this
discussion is still using an area in his home for an accessory
apartment. The Building Inspector is still getting complaints
from various areas of the City that people are using single
family dwellings and renting accessory apartments. She would
like some direction from the Council.
The City Planner stated that there is no official policy on
accessory apartments and the question should be dealt with.
MOTION made by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember
Paulsen to set July 23, 1985, at 7:30 P. M. for a public
hearing to consider a zoning amendment to allow accessory
apartments in residential zoning districts. The vote was ~
in favor with Mayor Polston absent and excused. Motion
carried.
SAC CHARGES ~ UNIT CHARGES FOR CHAPMAN PLACE
The City Manager explained his memo to the Council, dated June
17, 1985, regarding MWCC SAC charges and the City unit charges,
pointing out that these are two separate and different charges
totally. MWCC SAC charges go directly to the Metro Waste Control
Commissian to help finance future sewer capacity. The City's
13~
June 25, 1985
unit charges are used to cover the
were not assessed unit charges
assessment program, and the funds go
cover future capital improvements.
capital cost of people who
under the original sewer
into the Sewer Fund to help
The developer for Chapman Place, Mr. Prokasky, is trying to mix
the two up in order to not have to pay the City~s unit charges.
The Surfside is deficient in unit charges by 18. 18 times the
City unit charge of $292.00 equals $~,96~.00, which he has paid
but wanted the Council to decide if he had to pay this or if he
coul d use the MW CC's SAC credits against the amount owned for the
City 's unit charges.
The Council discussed this and agreed that the two charges are
completely different and separate.
MOTION made by Councilmember Jessen, seconded by
Councilmember Paulsen to deny the request of the developer
for Chapman Place to use the MWCC SAC credits to pay the
City's unit charges. The vote was 4 in favor with Mayor
Polston absent and excused. Motion carried.
BEQUEST TO RELEASE FOR PRIVATE SALE TO ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS
LOTS 1~ ~ 14, BLOCK 20~ AND LOT 1, BLOCK 20,a SHADYWOOD POINT
The City Manager explained that these three Lots have been a
dumping ground for the neighborhood for years. They would need a
drainage plan if they were to be developed. He stated that he
sent a letter to all the neighboring properties asking what they
would like to see done with these lots or if they preferred to
keep them as a dumping ground. Two persons responded to the
letter and are interested in purchasing them and combining them
with their property. The City could release these lots for
private sale to adjoining property owners, but retaining a
drainage easement or requiring a drainage plan if they were ever
developed. `
Faulsen moved and Peterson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #85-81 RESOLUTION RECONVEYING (IF NECESSARY)
CERTAIN TAX FORFEIT LANDS BACK TO THE
STATE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY BOARD TO
IHPOSE CONDITIONS ON THE SALE OF SAID TAX
FORFEIT LANDS TO RESTRICT THE SALE TO
OT~NERS OF ADJOINING LANDS
The vote was 4 in favor with Mayor Polston absent and excused.
Motion carried.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
The bills were presented for consideration.
135
June 25, 1985
MOTION made by Councilmember Paulsen, seconded by
Councilmember Jessen to approve the payment of bills as
presented on the pre-list in the amount of $80,188.74, when
funds area available. A roll call vote was 4 in favor with
Mayor Polston absent and excused. Motion carried.
The City Planner presented the plan for the downtown
beautification program which will be paid for from CDBG funds.
He had obtained the following quotations for the trees and shrubs
for this program.
Otten Bros. Nursery $7,749.60
Halla Nursery $7,883.00
There would also be a cost of $139.20 from Earl F. Anderson &
Associates for the appropriate signs and poles. He is
recommending approval of the Otten Bros. quotation and the Earl
F. Anderson & Associates cost of $139.20.
Jessen moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION f$5-82 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE PLAN FOR THE
DOidNTOiiN BEAUTIFICATION PROGRAM AND THE
QUOTATIONS FROM OTTEN BROS. NURSERY AND
EARL F. ANDERSON ~ ASSOCIATES TO BE PAID
FROM CDBG FUNDS
The vote was 4 in favor with Mayor Polston absent and excused.
Motion carried.
SF"P DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MANU-
FACTURING VARIOUS PLASTIC PRODUCTS AT 5340 SHORELINE BLVD , PID #
1 ~-117-24. 34 0066
The City Manager explained that C.R. Manufacturing has now
appeared before the Planning Commission and the Commission has
recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow C.R.
Manufacturing to manufacture various plastic products in part of
the old Tonka Building. Because of publication deadlines, it
could be the end of July before they would be on the Council
Agenda for a public hearing unless the Council sets a special
meeting. C.R. Manufacturing has to be out of their present
building and in a new location by August 1, 1985.
MOTION made by Councilmember Peterson, seconded by
Councilmember Jessen to set July 11, 1985, at 7:30 P. M. for a
public hearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow
manufacturing of various pastic products at 5340 Shoreline
Blvd., PID X13-117-24 34 0066. The vote was 4 in favor with
Mayor Polston absent and excused. Motion carried.
Councilmember Paulsen asked the Planner if there has been any
study done on allowing 1 Conditional Use Permit far the entire
136
June 25, 1985
Tonka Plant. The Planner stated yes, and that it is in the form
of an amendment to the PIA of the Zoning Code and is in the
Councilts packet on page 1572 and 1573. He further stated that
it is becoming common practice in most cities and it will still
give the Council the right to approve of alI business allowed in
the building.
A. Alcohol in Parks, news article - The City Manager asked the
City Council if they wished to continue the policy of
allowing alcohol in the Depot Building at Mound Bay Park.
The City insurance agent has been unable to get the City
insurance to cover citizens having alcohol in the Depot which
then puts the burden on the citizens having to have their
insurance agent extend their homeowners insurance to cover
them for dram shop for that day and name the City as
additional insured. This, to alot of agents, is difficult,
if not impossible. The Council discussed this item and
decided that if people want to have alcohol in the Depot,
they would have to provide insurance. '
CC LAKE ANN VS
The City Manager handed out materials covering the. above from a
meeting he attended this week. He stated that the MWCC
recommends the gravity sewer line (Lake Ann) and the Metro
Council Staff recommends the Lake Virginia forcemain. The
gravity line is much more expensive and he stated he will follow
this to try to make sure that Mound residents do not end up
paying more than they should.
METRO TRANSIT LETTER DATED JUNE 18, 1985
The City Manager stated that he has received a letter from the
Metro Transit Commission stating that they are recommending that
Mound would no longer have Route 51 service to downtown
Minneapolis. Instead Mound would be served by a new Route 75
which would operate express service during the peak periods via
the express lanes on Highway 12. During off-peak times, Route 75
would provide local service between Mound, Orono and Wayzata.
They feel improved connections between express and local buses at
Wayzata would be provided using timed-transfer techniques.
Unfortunately they notified us of a public hearing on this only
two days ago. The City Manager will monitor and keep the Council
informed.
FLSA-(FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT)
The City Manager submitted a report from the ICMA on the Fair
Labor Standards Act for the Councils review and study. It will
be discussed further at another time.
137
June- 25, 1985
B. Proposed new ordinance. amendment to cover the Tonka Building.
C. Notice of hearing at Planning Commission - June 24, 1985.
D. Industrial Revenue Bond status report for Balboa.
E. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District - Agenda - June 20, 1985
Minutes - May 16th & 23rd
F. Official notice of Contel Phone rate increase.
G. Notice of Burlington Northern intent to abandon railroad line
thru Mound.
H. News clipping from Wall Street Journal.
I. Letter from Hennepin County regarding CSAH 15 Variance
Hearing.
J. Twin Cities Labor Market Information for June.
K. Update on sewer allocation between Westonka are cities.
L. Evaluation report for replacement of the Shorewood II
Interceptor (Lake Virginia/Lake Ann).
M. MWCC Budget hearing notice.
N. Solid waste resource vendor letter - Hennepin County.
0. Tax exempt bond meeting.
P. Ehlers & Associates newsletter.
Q. Letter from Meto Council regarding Highway 7.
R. Chamber Waves - June.
S. Met Council water policy statement.
Councilmember Smith asked that the Building Inspector take the
plans that were originally submitted for the Conditional Use
Permit in November or December 1984, and the plans, A-1 & A-2,
that were incorporated into the resolution this last month and
compare the two, listing all the differences between those plans.
The City Manager stated that she would do this and set a tim e
with Councilmember Smith when they could get together and go over
these differences.
NOTION made by Councilmember Paulsen, seconded by
Gouncilmember Smith to adjourn at 10:30 P. M. The vote was ~
138
June 25, 1985
in favor with Mayor Polston absent and excused. Motion
carried.
~~~
n Elam, City Manager
~J\r,~rn t ~.~Ow~
T
Fran Clark, City Clerk
BILLS---------JUNE 25, 1985
Batch 854056---Computer run dated 6/13/85
Batch 854062---Computer run dated 6/19/85
Batch 854063---Computer run dated 6/20/85
TOTAL BILLS
4,591.71
52,648.72
22,847.31
80,188.74
-1
~~
E