The URL can be used to link to this page

79-06-12CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Revised AGENDA 79-200 79-201 79-204/206 79-193 ~79.-197 I79-199 £79-205 ~79-196 ! 79-198 ~ 79-195 79-192 79-194 79-203 10. ll. '12. 13. Mound City Council June 12, 1979 City Hall 7:30 P.M. 1. Public Hearings A. Chestnut Road Pg. 1644 B. Pelican Point - Final Plat Pg. 1639-1643 C. Rezoning - Lots 19 & 20, Aud. Subd. 170, etc. (Continued) 2. Planning Commission Recommendations A. B. C. D. E. F. 3. Bonds A. Industrial Revenue Bonds Pg. 1598-1599 B. 1979 Improvement Bonds Pg. 1588-1597 4. Salary Plan Pg. 1665 5. Swimming Beaches Pg. 1586-1587 6. Conu~ents & Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) 7. Tax Forfeit Land A. Lots ll & 12, Block 9, Woodland Point Pg. 1582-1585 B. Lot 5, Block 28, Wychwood Pg. 1581 c. C.M. 79-2O2 ?~. 15SO D. Other 8. Licenses & Permits A. Club License Renewal - VFW Pg. 1579 B. Dock Permits Pg. '1576-1578 County Road 15 Pg. 1575 Transfer offends Payment of Bills Information ~morandum/Misc. Pg. 1556-1574 a 1646-1664 Committee Reports Pg. 1600-1636 Subdivision of Land-Lots 4,5,6 & 15, Block 15, Seton Side Yard Variance/Non-conforming Use-Lot 14, Block 3, Shirley Hills B Front Yard Variance-Lot 4, Block 2, The Bluffs Street Vacation - Devon I~ne from Carrick to Longford House Size Variance/House Moving to Lots i & 15, Block 13, Drean~ood House Moving Permit to Lots 6 & 7, Block 2, Shirley Hills Unit A 1657-1658 a 1666-1667 Pg. 1645 CI~ OF ~0UI¢9 Mound, Minnesota Revised AGENDA 79-200 79-201 79-204/206 79-193 79-197 79-199 79-2o5 79-196 79-198 79-195 79-192 ~ 79-194 79-~03 Mound City Council June 12, 1979 City r ll 7:30 P.M. e B. C. D. E. F. Bonds P~blic Hearings A. Chestnut Road Pg. 1644 B. Pelican Point - Final Plat Pg. 1639-1643 C. Rezoning - Lots 19 & 20, Aud. Subd. 170, etc. (Continued) Planning Commission Recommendations Pg. 1600-1636 Subdivision of Land-Lots 4,5,6 & 15, Block 15, Seton Side Yard Variance/Non-conforming Use-Lot 14, Block 3, Shirley Hills B Front Yard Variance-Lot 4, Block 2, The Bluffs Street Vacation - Devon Lane from Carrick to Longford House Size Variance/House Moving to Lots i & 15, Block 13, Dreamwood House Moving Permit to Lots 6 & 7, Block 2, Shirley Hills Unit A A. Lndustrial Revenue Bonds Pg. B. 1979 Improvement Bonds Pg. 4. Salary Plan Pg. 1665 5. Swimming Beaches Pg. 1586-1587 6. Comments & Suggestions by Citizens Present 7. Tax Forfeit Land 1598-1599 1588-1597 (2 Minute Limit) A. Lots 11 & 12, Block 9, Woodland Point Pg. 1582-1585 B. Lot 5, Block 28, Wychwood Pg. 1581 C. C.M. 79-202 Pg. 1580 D. Other 8. Licenses & Permits A. Club License Renewal - VFW Pg. 1579 B. Dock Permits Pg. ~1576-1578 9. County Road 15 Pg. 1575 10. Transfer ofF ands Il. Payment of Bills 12. Information Memorandum/Misc. Pg. 1556-1574 & 1646-1664 13. Committee Reports 1637-1638 & 1666-1667 Pg. 1645 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 11, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-206 SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance - Beachside Attached is a proposed ordinance for the rezoning of Beachside land. L~o-hard L Kopp -/ ~ ORDINANCE NO. AN oRDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 23.06, 23.011 AND 23.05 BY REZONING CERTAIN LANDS FROM MULTIPLE DWELLINGS TO RESIDENTIAL A-1 AND RESIDENTIAL B The City of Mound does ordain: Section 23.06, Subd. b, Subsection 8 and 9 of the Mound City Code is amended as follows: The following described property is hereby deleted from this Multiple Use District: Ail of Lots 19 and 20, Auditors Subdivision Number 170 and also, Lots 28 to 32, inclusive, The Bartlett Place Upper Lake Minnetonka. Section 23.011, Subd. b, of the Mound City Code is amended by adding subsection 39, which shall read as follows: 39. The following land is hereby rezoned to Residential Use District A-l: Ail of Lot 20 and that part of Lot 19 lying north of the north line of Lot 18 and the same extended northeasterly across Lot 19 to intersect with the east boundary line of Lot 19, all in Auditors Subdivision Number 170. Section 23.05, Subd. b, of the Mound City Code is amended by adding subsection 8 which shall read as follows: 8. The following land is hereby rezoned to Residential Use District B: That part of Lot 19, Auditors Subdivision Number 170, beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 19 than southwesterly to the southeast corner of Channel Town except dedicated road, than ~horthwesterly to northeasterly corner thereof than northeasterly along the extension of the northwesterly line of Channel Town to its intersection with east line of Lot 19 than south to north- western corner of Lot 32, The Bartlett Place Uppe~ Lake Minnetonka, then southerly to point of beginning; and also Lots 28 to 32, inclusive, The Bartlett Place, Upper Lake Minnetonka. The Zoning Map of the City on file with the City Clerk is hereby amended in accordance with these rezoning provisions. Attest: Mayor City Clerk 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 11, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-205 SUBJECT: Salary Plan - Office Employees The Council at the May 22nd meeting, set June 12th as the date to have Stanton Associates explain their proposal on salary plan for office employees (refer to Information Memorandum 79-60, Page 1434). This is being listed on the revised June 12th Agenda. Please refer to booklet sent with I.M. 79-60. L~onard L. Kopp ~ 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound~ Minnesota June 11~ 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO, 79-65 SUBJECT: Auction The auction of.unclaimed and surplus items held June 9th resulted in $3,289.00 worth of sales: 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 11, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-66 SUBJECT: Suit on Real Estate Assessment Attached is a copy of a suit served on the County regarding some property assessments in Mound. As explained in the letter, the suit will be answered by the County. The property involved is: Subdivision Lot Limited . Block Market Value Market Value The Highlands 14 & Pt. of 15 16 The Highlands Pt. of 15 & Pt. 16 16 The Highlands 20 & Pt. of 19 16 The Highlands' Pt. of 16 & Pt. 17 16 The Highlands Pt. of 19 & Pt. 20 16 The Highlands Pt. of 17 & Lot 18 16 $57,800 $57,800 55,800 55~800. 55,~00 55,500. 54~800. 54~800. 55~600. 55,600. 55,500. 55~500, FINANCE DIVISION A603 Government Center Minneapolis,. Minnesota 55487 City Clerk Mound June 7, 1979 Attached herewith is a copy of a petition(s) for review of taxes assessed · in your municipality. This petition is forwarded to you under the provisions of Chapter llS, Laws of 1977. Chapter ll8 further provides that within 20'~ays after receipt of the petition by your governmental unit you may give notice to the County Attorney and to the petitioner or his attorney that your city is taking .charge of and prosecuting the proceedings. If such notice is not given, the County Attorney shall take ch~r§e and prosecute such proceedings. Sincerely yours, non 1. Hoppe Finance Division Manager VTH: em Enclosure HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal opportunity employer I/ / ') ./ STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE NO. In Re: Objections and Defenses to Real Property Taxes for the 1978 Assessment Dr. I. F. Shaffhausen Petitioner, Petition for Review of the~l.978 Real Property jTax Assessment Pursuant · '~':to M.S.A. §278.01 USo , State of Minnesot~a and County of Hennepin CO~S NOW the Petitioner and petitions the Court for review of the 1978 real property assessment pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 278, and in support of such Petition pleads certain objec- tions and defenses together with allegations in support thereof as follows: The Petitioner herein has an estate, right, title or interest in or lien upon the real estate involved in this Petition sufficient to maintain this Petition pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 278. II. The real estate involved in this Petition and the assessment of which the Petitioner is protest'ing is described and designated in the tax statement or statements or other Memorandum attached hereto as Appendix "A" and the descriptions or identifying numbers thereon are herewith and hereby incorporated as though recited at length and in full. III. The.real estate described in Exhibit "A" is located in the City of Mound and Minneapolis. IV. The Petitioner has been discriminated against in the assess- ment of its property as compared to other real property in the , / taxing district herein concerned in that the other real property has been systematically, arbitrarily and/or intentionally under ~alued, all of which is contrary to the requirements of uniformity due process and equal protection of the'law required under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and Section 7 of Article I and Section 1 of Article X of the Constitution of the State °f'Minnesota. The real estate herein concerned was not assessed equitably .in reference to assessments of other like properties which is con- trary to the Constitutions of the State of MinnesOta and of the United States. Classifications or the application of such classifications, for purposes 'of taxation under Chapter 273 Of Minnesota Statutes, of certain real property in the taxing district herein concerned are contrary to the 'requirement of uniformity, due process and equal protection of the law required under the Fourteenth Amend- ment of. the constitution of the United State's, Section 7 of Article I and Section 1 of Article X of the Constitution of the State of Minnesota, causing the real estate taxes on Petitioner's real estate payable in 1979 to be unlawfully high. VII. Special tax laws, or the application thereof, for purposes of taxation under Chapter 273 of Minnesota Statutes and/or other statutes, of certain real property in the taxing district herein concerned are contrary to the requirements of uniformity, due process and equal protection of the law required under the Four- teenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, Section..7 and Article I and Section 1 of Article X of the Constitution of the State of Minnesota, causing discrimination against Petitioner and the taxation of his real estate. -- 2 -- WI{EI~FORE, the Petitioner-prays that the Court make its Order as follows: 1. Determining that the estimated market value, limited 'mar- ket value, assessed value and/or general taxes on the Petitioner's real estate should be reduced i'n accordance with the evidence and the laws of the State of Minnesota and the United States. 2. In the event the Petitioner has-.paid'.~ess than the full f real estate taxes and installments of special 'assessments, that no penalty, costs or interest be levied on the unpaid portion %hereof. 3. The Petitioner recover interest at the legal rate on that amount of the general real estate taxes paid in excess of the CoUrt determination herein. 5. just and equitable. The Petitioner recover its costs and disbursements herein. Such other and further relief as the Court may determine LAPP, LAZAR,-.LAURIE & SMITH CHARTERED Dated: By Benjamin'J. Smith Attorneys for:Petitioner 1200 Builders Exchange Building Minneapolis, Minnesota-55402 Telephone: (612) 338-5815 Due and personal service of a copy of the within Petition is admitted at , Minnesota, on , 1979. County Treasurer Due and personal service of two copies of the within Petition is admitted at' , Minnesota, on , 1979. County Auditor Due and personal service of a copy of the within Petition is admitted at , Minnesota, on , 1979. County Attorney 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 11, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-67 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land At the last Council meeting, the Council asked some lots be with- held from sale until a determination could be made that they not be cut into smaller lots. They are: ../:..j~ ~o..~.~%~..'~-~o ' ' . ,,..~ ~'~.~.0 I. Lots 2, 18 and 19, Block 8, Pe~roke .:~./ ~.~/.j.~2'~:.~,~ II. _.:-::....: ..... TUXEDO" "~" "?' .... '""- The above are zoned A-1. This requires 10,000 square feet for a single family home. There is not 20,000 square feet in the three lots. LOts 41 & 42, Block 10, Pembroke Lot 43 & Part of Lot 44 and Part of Vacated Essex Lane, Block 10 Lot 45 & Part of Lot 44 and Part of Vacated Essex Lane, Block 10 ----- / The above are zoned A'2¥;-67~00 square feet. In the above case, the City could hold the center lot and allow the two outside lots to go for sale. Or the City can purchase and resell it with restrictions. INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO, 79167 SUBJECT:' Tax Forfeit Land - Page 2 III. Lots 30, 31 and 32~ Block 9~ Wychwood This is zoned Residential B and they c~n build ~ duplex on 9~600 square feet if they pay two sewer un~t~: Leonard L.. KOpp CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 11, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-68 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land - Easements Easements. for streets are needed for the following tax forfeit lots: Pembrok~ Lots 41, 42 and 43, Block 10 - a temporary 15 foot construction easement over the north 15 feet. Lots 44. and 45 and vacated street - a temporary construction ease- ment. Wychwood Lots 32 and 1/2 of 31, Block 9 - temporary easement Lots 30 and 1/2 of 31, Block 9 - temporary easement Lots 16, 17, 18 and 1/2 of 19, Block 8 - a permanent and temporary easement. Two re~olutions are requested; one for the Pembroke lots and one for the Wychwood lots. Leonard L. Kopp ! v /asa 'IP 73O A temporary construction easement for street purposes over and across the following described property: Lots 41, 42 and 43, Block 10, PEMBROKE, according to the recorded plat thereof. Said temporary construction easement being the north 15.00 feet of said 'Lots 41, 42 and 43. Said temporary construction easement expires August 31, 1980. IP 731 A temporary construction easement for street purposes over and across the following described property. Lots 44 and 45, Block 10, PEMBROKE, according to the recorded plat thereof. Said temporary construction easement being that part of said Lot 44 lying north of the following described line. Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 44 distant 5.00 feet south of the northeast corner of said Lot 44; thence west to a point on the west line of said Lot 44 distant 10.00 feet south of the northwest corner of said Lot 44 and there terminating. Said temporary construction easement expires August 31, 1980. IP 738 A temporary construction easement for street purposes over and across the following described property: Lot 30 and the East Half of Lot 31, Block 9, WYCHW00D, according to the recorded plat thereof. Said temporary construction easement being the south 30 feet of said Lot 30 and the south 20.00 feet of said Lot 31. 'Said temporary construction easement expires August 31, 1980. IP 737 A temporary construction easement for street purposes over and across the following described property. Lot 32 and the East Half of Lot 31, Block 9, WYCHWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof. Said temporary construction easement being the south 25.00 feet of said Lot 31 and that part of said Lot 32 lying southerly of the following described line. Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 32 distant 15.00 feet north of the southeast corner of said Lot 32; thence westerly to a point on the west line of said Lot 32 distant 20.00 feet north of the southwest corner of said Lot 32 and there terminating. Said temporary construction easement expires August 31, 1980. IP 736 A perpetual easement and a temporary construction easement for street purposes over, under and across the followin§ described property. Lots 16, 17, 18 and the West Half of Lot 19, Block 8, WYCHWOOD, according to the recorded plat thereof. Said perpetual easement being the east 5.00 feet of the south 10.O0 feet of said Lot 17. Also the west 5.00 feet of the south 10.00 feet of said Lot 18. Said temporary construction easement being the south 15.00 feet of said Lot 16. Also the south 25.00 feet of said Lot 17. Also the south 15.00 feet of said Lot 18. Said temporary construction easement expires August'31, 1980. June 7, 1979 Leonard Kopp City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota MCCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ~ LAND SURVEYORS I~1 SITE ~6~NNERS Subject: Mound, Minnesota 1979 Street Improvements Dear Leonard: Under our recently signed contract, any project that goes over two million dollars the engineering fee will be negotiated. However, since this project was started before the contract was signed and we had not anticipated that it would go over two million dollars we have not negotiated the engineering fee. What I have proposed in the attached invoice is that we took a percentage, agreed to in our contract, and applied it to $2,000,000 which gave us a total engineering fee of approximately $146,000. We than took that total fee and divided it into the actual bid price of $2,236,000.00 and came up with a proposed fee of 6.528%. What we have done is charge you as if the bid was $2,000,000 even though the bid price was higher. We think this is fair in determining our fees and hope you concur. The ASCE Hanual No. 45 gives the Median Compensation for a $2,200,000 project as 6.82%, so we are also less than that (copy attached). Very truly yours, McCOMBSKNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. William H. McCombs, P.E. WHM:j1 Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls STATEMENT ~~ 15 June 1979 OMBS-KNUISON ASSOCIAIES, NC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS [] LANO SURVEYORS · SITE PLANNERS JOB. No. 2-1-4213-0 12805 OLSON MEMORIAL HWY. - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-3700 22 NORTH MAIN ST. -HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE (612) 879-8029 City of blound · Mound~ },,~inneso%a Engineering services in connection with preliminary report~ plans and specs - 1979 Streets and Storm Se~e~. Construction Cost: 2,236,517.65 Feet 90~o' of 6.528,Y, of Cons:. Cost(2,236,517.65) Less amt. billed 1/.15~79 #2-1-4575-1 12/.13/78 #2-1-4213-0 9/20/78 #2-1-4213-0 - 131,400.00 ( ~,000.00) (22,525.40) Amount due this billin~ 101,252.00 McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. TERMS: Net on Receipt of Invoice. 1% Service Charge per month assessed on Past Due Accounts. (12% Per Annum) /6.52. -81, - gt~ 'ON lenUel~l =I:3SV ~;L6L u.~o~:l · AIIXa-lalAIo3 EIE)~bI3AV-3AOS'~' 40 SJ_O3¢O~la blOJ 1SO3 NOIIOnblISNO3 -tO 3~)~'lN33b13cl '¢ S~' C]3SS3tJdX3 'S331A~J3S 315V8 blOJ NOIJ_~'SN3dlAIO3 N~'IQ31N '~¢ 3Ablg3 - L '91-1 SJellOP ,to suoill!UJ u! '~,soa uo!:).onJ:lSUO3 ~aN 001 O~ OI ~ I ~'0 !'0 gO'O I0'0 09' cj 000' 000' 0;~ £0'9 000'000' 0L 0 t' 9 000' 000' 8 0~'9 000' 000' 9 9E:' 9 000' 000' Iz ~' 9 000' 000' 8 £§'Z 000'000' L 06:Z 000' 0§Z ;~S '9 000' 00~ gZ'6 000' 0§;~ £9' L L 000'00L 88'£ [ 000' OS V a^Jn3 ~,soD LUOJJ % uo]lonJ~,SUOO laN g 9 OI II £1 June 5, 1979 ATTORNEY AT LAW 1503 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55454 612/333-5419 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PERFOP~,~D BY T~0~Y L. PIEPKOPd~ FOR THE CITY OF MOU~) FOR THE MONTH OF i~Y, 1979 hours 1. May 1~ prepared formal complaint ............... . .................... 2. ~y 7: prepared 20 complaints; 2 letters to Lind~; letters on Bedel Ju~T~ial 5 00 3. May 8~ arraignments; 1 Court Trial; 5 Pze-T~ials; letter to Max~y~zske .......................................... . ...... 3.50 4. May 11~ meeting with citizen at Mound Office ........................ 75 5. ~Y 17~ calls to attorney on Juzy Trial; calls to officer; preparation for trial ................. . ....................... . .... ,... 2.00 6. Mmy 18~ Ju~y Trial (defendant plead guilty); p~epa~e~ 4 complaints. 3.50 7. ¥~Y 20: 14case summaries sent to Chief of Police.... .............. 2.75 8. May 21: prepared 2 complaints; two letters to Linda.... ........ .... 2.00 9. May 22~ 3 P~e-trials ..... . ....................................... .. 2.25 10. ~y 27: review of Police Re~Orts (Jensen)~ Letter to I~s. Jensen$ meeting with citizen at Mound Office ..... ....~ ............ 11. ~y 30:3 calls f~om citizens; 2 calls to Wayzata ................ . 1.75 .75 12. May 31~ 7 letters to Witnesses for Ju_~y Trials; 3 calls to Lindm$ review of files scheduled for trials ..................... . 2. O0 27.00 TOTAL OWING ($300.00 for 15 hours & $420.00 for 12 hours at $30 00 an hours) 720 00 PAUL £. BOHNSACK II LAW OFFICES OF EARLE 'F. ANDERSON, JR. 2040 DAIN TOWER 339-9701 June 8, 1979 McCombs-Kn ut s on IAssoci ate s 12805 Olson H±/~J~way Minneapolis~HN 55441 Attent±/~/Mr. Lyle Swanson Our Clients: Mr. & Mrs. Larry D. Elm 2012 Villa Lane Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Swanson: This communication is addressed to you for the purpose of inform- ing you that the undersigned represents Larry D. and Virginia Elm with respect to the damage that has occurred to the property of our clients as the result of a storm sewer project. You have pre- viously discussed this matter with my clients and at this time it is our request that in the future you refrain from personal contact with Mr. and Mrs. Elm and address your inquiries to me. It seems evident at this time that the City has directly or through its agents trespassed upon the property of Mr. and Mrs. Elm at 2012 Villa Lane and in the course of said trespassing has destroyed trees and other vegetation while the City constructed a storm sewer outlet on my client's property without an easement right thereon. Prior to commencing to any litigation, I deem it advisable that we explore various alternatives available for resolving the various problems of this encroachment. If it is your desire in behalf of your company and the City to discuss a settlement of this problem, please contact the undersigned after you have given some thought to alternatives available to resolving the problem. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Respectfully yours, Earle T. Anderson, Jr. ETA/cs / cc: Mound City Administrator v/ cc: Mr. and Mrs. Larry Elm HENNEPIN EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS ORGANIZATION 6-7-79 TO: HECO DIRECTORS FROM: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE A.t its meeting on 6-6-79 the Executive Committee attached budget for 1980 which is forwarded to you/for consideration · at the annual meeting of the HECO Board of Direc~rs on.July 18, 1979.// The proposed budget provides for staffing a 70% of full-tEe aha based upon the assumption that no new projects will be undertaken by HECO during 1980. DON OMODT President ~ENNEPIN EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS ORGANIZATION PROPOSED 1980 BUDGET (Approved by Executive Committee 6/6/79) EXPENDITURES Anticipated Over or Proposed 1979 1979 Under 1980 Budget Expenditures 1979 Budget Budget PERSONAL SERVICES Salaries Benefi ts $27,670 $27,670 '0 $27,210 20,950 20,950 0 20,771 6,720 6,720 0 6,439 MATERIALS, SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 3,219 2,394 (825) 3,370 Telephone/Postage 700 670 30 700 Professional Services 499 499 0 550 Employee Expenses 1,720 1,075 (645) 1,820 Travel 600 0 (600) 600 Meetings and Parking 220 175 (45) 220 Transportation 900 900 0 1,000 Supplies Other Charges 175 75 (100) 175 125 75 (50) 125 CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 0 CONTINGENCY 1,901 0 (1,901) 2,000 TOTAL $32,790 $30,064 (2:.726.) $32,580 REVENUES Dues Interest Surplus Excess of Revenues over Expenditures $15,000 $15,100 100 $22,000 75 2,100 2,025 580 17,715 17,715 0 I0,000 32,790 34,915 2,125 32,580 0 4,851 (4,851) 0 FUND EQUITY 1/1/79 Fund Equity $ 6,404.34 12/31/79 Anticipated Excess of Revenues over Expenditures 4,851.00 12/31/79 Fund Equity 11,2'55.34 Appropriated to 1980 Budget 10,000.00 1/1/80 Fund Equity $ 1,255.34 (Over for Dues Schedule) Mm OPOLrrAN .. Iq,a; 25, 1979 MEMORA~DUM TO: Ail Interested Parties FROM: Metropoliban Health Board SUBJECT: Announcing a Public Forum on the Report on Long-Ran~e Hospital Planning with Criteria and Procedures for Reduction of Excess Acute Inpatient Hospital Capacity on: June 20, 1979 7:00 p.m. Metropolitan Council Chambers Suite 300, Metro Square Bldg. 7th & Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Attached you will find a draft of the Metropolitan Health Board's Report on Long-Range Hospital Planning. This report is the culmination of several years of unprecedented community activity, involving hospital administrator's, hospital trustees, medical personnel and concerned consumers. The report makes strong recommendations for change in the health care delivery system, in order to contain the inflationary rise in health care costs. These recommendations suggest a reduction of acute care beds and consolidation of seven specialized services: cardiac catheterization, open heart surgery, pediatrics, obstetrics, perinatal services, megavoltage radiation therapy and CT scanning. The draft report also sets forth procedures for eliminating excess capacity. Despite the extensive public involvement that has preceded this draft, the Health Bo~rd seeks additional comments from both health providers and consumers. Interested parties are urged to s~udy the attached draft, and commen~ either in writing or at the public forum. Those speaking at the forum are encouraged to register by contacting Eleanor Sumeson at 291-6352, and to provide a written copy of their remarks at the time of their testimony. The~forum record wii! be kept open for additional comments for seven dmys after the forum, until ~he end of the business day on June 27, 1979. Additional copies of the draft Report on Long-Range Hospital Planning are available at no cost from the Metropolitan Council's Public Information Office, 291-6464. / sm An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolit;~n Are:~ Co~prising: AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS FIRST NATIONAL-SOO LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARr~UETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 339-8291 (AREA CODE 612) File: Financial Consultants: Ehlers and Associates Please distribute to governing body members June 1, 1979 The big news was the outlawing of housing bonds by a proposed law, by a non-law. Following Treasury's lead, Congress found it can rule effectively by proposing a law with an immediately effective date whether or not the proposal ever becomes law. Attorneys won't issue "tax exempt" opinions in the face of such proposed laws or Treasury regs and, without such opinions, bonds aren't marketable. Such laws can't be challenged because they are only "proposed"; any court challenge would be premature. It wasn't all bad in that some massive offerings were headed off just when casualty insurance companies left the bond market. The market was about to be swamped. Sometime we'll have to decide what public purposes are really entitled tp tax exempt financing. A public purpose can be found in practically every activity. (Even a driver's or pilot's license is or is not "in the public interest" and therefore granted or denied.) Let's try a modest proposal: The test of whether a purpose is entitled to tax exempt financing should rest on whether ownership of the facility (long term lease or title or other legal control) will be in public hands. Except possibly for health organizations, when the principal beneficiary is a private entity the financing should not be entitled to a state's constitutional exemption from federal taxation. Only those facilities which serve the public and which will be owned and controlled by the states or their subdivisions and, without which,the states' sovereignty would be impaired would be constitutionally tax exempt. The constitutional argu- ment is much stronger if only those functions essential to a state's sovereignty are exempt from taxation by the federal government whose powers were originally delegated by the states. Congress might still exempt certain borrowings from federal taxation, but it would be by federal, not state, legislation. The bond market remains remarkably steady considering the inflation. One waits for the other shoe to drop. Warmest regards, EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. DOW-JONES BOND INDEX: 6.89% Tax-Exempt Bonds 8.0C 7.0: 7.00 ;.OO LOC THE WALL STREET ,JOURNAL Monday, May 21, 1979 R Lot 10 Block sUbdivision 7 Arden TAX FORFEIT LAND Plat ParCel 37730 3550 6-5-79 Disposition Undersized -.hold from sale. 6 12,13,14 & 15 5 Avalon 12 Avalon 37850 0975 Private sale. 37850 3500. 3525! 3560) 3 Devon 37870 0560 Hold-undersized. w/ 17 2 2,18 & 19 27 &'% ~f 26 8 41 & 42 10 43 & Pt. Of 44 10. 45 & Pt. of 44 10 4 Devon 7 Pemt~roke 7 Pembroke Pembroke Pembroke Pembroke Pembroke 37870 1375 37910 3500 37910 3500. 3900! 3925) 37910 4760 37910 0191 37910 0192 37910 0193 Hold-undersized./ Held-undersized'/ (~. Combine - sell as one parcel Sell as a building site '~-' Sell - building 'site.-- Sell - building site. ~> ~' Sell - building site. 17 12 Pembroke 37910 7950 Hold-undersized. b~ 21 17 & 18 12 Pembroke 14 Seton 37910 8050 37950 2475 Hold-undersized. w/ Sell - building site.%/ 19 f 24 22 11 Pt. of 3 2 3 & 24 4 O, 31 & 32 9. u"~19,20 & % of 18 18 Seton Whipple Wychwood Wychwood Wychwood Wychwood 37950 4090 37970 2680 38010 0096 38010 0655 38010 2255~ 2275I 38010 4045 Take - wetlands Take - wetlands Private sale. Take - wetlands Combine and se~''~ Hold for stre~-~ '~et %/ 18 22 1 36 6 34 19 & 20 8 2 Wychwood 38010 Wychwood 38010 Wychwood 38010 Aud. Subd.170 61290 Dreamwood 61580 4560 5100 6440 5915 0750 Private sale ~" Hold-undersized Beachside v'~ Private sale. ~-~ Lot 22 12 + Pt. 22 3 13 38 Block 2 6 i4 Subdivision Dreamwood 61580 1100 A.Lincoln Add. 2480~ Lakeside Pk. 61730 2760) Mound Terrace 61890 9365 Shadywood Pt. 61980 8160 Subd~ Lots l& 62150 4100 32, Skarps Plat Parcel Disposition Hold - undersized Take wetlands~/ Combine with Lot 14~~/ Undersized McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS~ LAND SURVEYORS· SITE PLANNERS June 12, 1979 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: City of Mound Maintenance - Retaining Walls Dear Mr. Kopp: As requested, we have looked at the question of whether the property owner or the City should maintain the rock and timber retaining walls which are being construction with the new streets. I have talked with the Citites of Golden Valley and Rich- field, bo'th of which have a lot of the same type of wall as Mound. Both cities maintain these walls themselves. The City of Golden Valley has had virtually no maintenance to do and Richfield has occasionally replaced a stone or remortered a portion of wall. I believe Bob Shanley has talked with a number of other cities who maintain the walls. I am not aware of any city which has the homeowner maintain a wall on street R.O.W. It is our recommendation that the City of Mound maintain the walls which are built with the streets. This will assure uniform maintenance quality. There are many elderly people in the City who probably could not do even minor maintenance work. If walls are damaged by collisions with cars etc. the City could be reimbursed by the insurance on the car. Experience in other cities has shown that wall maintenance is not a significant expense. If you have any questions or need additional information, please advise. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. 12805 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-3700 LS: sh 22 NORTH MAIN STREET, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE (612) 897-8029 SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING DIVISION, MARSHALL, MINNESOTA 56258 TELEPHONE (507) 532-5820 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-207. SUBJECT: Retaining Wall Maintenance Attached is a copy of a letter from. the Public Works Director indicating all cities contacted maintain retaining w~lls/put up by a contractor on a .city project.' Inasmuch. as sOme. easements are being held up while people await the Council's decision, it is recommended that a resolution establishing the policy be passed. OLU N ' .~ ' , RESOLUTION ESTA~ISHING A POLICY O~ THE. CITY MAINTAINING RETAINING WALLS~[CONSTRUCTED BY THE CITY OR A ~CONTRACTOR HIRED BY THE CITY, CITY o'f MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 June 11, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp Public Works Director Retaining Walls As requested by the Council at their last meeting I have checked with other cities as to their maintenance program on retaining walls. Ail of the cities that I contacted do the maintenance on retaining walls that were installed by a program of city improvement. It would be my recommendation that the Public Works Department take care of the maintenance of all walls installed by a contractor under our current and past road projects. Respectfully, Robert Shanley Public Works Director RS/jcn /g 77 Mound, Minnesota AGENDA 79-200 79-201 i79-204 [79-193 79-197 79-199 79-196 79-198 79-195 79-192 79-194 79-203 5. 6. 7. Mound City Council June 12, 1979 City Hall 7:30 P.M. 1. Minutes 2. Public Hearings A. Chestnut Road Pg. 1644 B. Pelican Point - Final Plat Pg. 1639-1643 C. Rezoning - Lots 19 & 20, Aud. Subd. 170, etc. (Continued) 1637-1638 3. Planning Commission Recommendations Pg. 1600-1636 A. Subdivision of Land-Lots 4,5,6 & 15, Block 15, Seton B. Side Yard Variance/Non-conforming Use-Lot 14, Block 3, Shirley Hills B C. Front Yard Variance-Lot 4, Block 2, The Bluffs D. Street Vacation - Devon Lane from Carrick to Longford E. House Size Variance/House Moving to Lots 1 & 15,Block 13, Dreamwood F. House Moving Permit to Lots 6 & 7, Block 2, Shirley Hills Unit A 4. Bonds A. Industrial Revenue Bonds Pg. 1598-1599 B. 1979 Improvement Bonds Pg. 1588-1597 Swimming Beaches Pg. 1586-1587 Comments & Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) Tax Forfeit Land A. Lots 11 & 12, Block 9, Woodland Point Pg. 1582-1585 B. Lot 5, Block 28, Wychwood Pg. 1581 C. C.M. 79-202. Pg. 1580 D. Other (Will be out on Monday) 8. Licenses & Permits A. Club License Renewal - VFW Pg. 1579 B. Dock Permits Pg. 1576-1578 9. County Road 15 Pg. 1575 10. Transfer of Funds 11. Payment of Bills 12. Information Memorandum/Misc. Pg. 1556-1574 13. Committee Reports Pg. McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS II LAND SURVEYORS[] SITE PLANNERS June 12, 1979 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: City of Mound Maintenance - Retaining Walls Dear Mr. Kopp: As requested, we have looked at the question of whether the property owner or the City should maintain the rock and timber retaining walls which are being construction with the new streets. I have talked with the Citites of Golden Valley and Rich- field, both of which have a lot of the same type of wall as Mound. Both cities maintain these walls themselves. The City of Golden Valley has had virtually no maintenance to do and Richfield has occasionally replaced a stone or remortered a portion of wall. I believe Bob Shanley has talked with a number of other cities who maintain the walls. I am not aware of any city which has the homeowner maintain a wall on street R.O.W. It is our recommendation that the City of Mound maintain the walls which are built with the streets. This will assure uniform maintenance quality. There are many elderly people in the city who probably could not do even minor maintenance work. If walls are damaged by collisions with cars etc. the City could be reimbursed by the insurance on the car. Experience in other cities has shown that wall maintenance is not a significant expense. If you have any questions or need additional information, please advise. Very truly yours, LS:sh McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. 12805 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-3700 22 NORTH MAIN STREET, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE (612) 8974~029 SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING DIVISION, MARSHALL, MINNESOTA 56258 TELEPHONE (507) 532-5820 6-12 -79 CITY OF MOUND Mound~ M~nnesota June 12~ 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-207. SUBJECT: Retaining Wall Maintenance Attached is a copy of a letter from the Public Works Director indicating all cities contacted maintain retaining walls, put up by a contractor on a .city project. Inasmuch. as sOme. easements are being held up while people await the Council's decision, it is recommended that a resolution establishing the policy be passed. RESOLUTION RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY OF THE CITY MAINTAINING RETAINING WALLS CONSTRUCTED BY THE CITY OR A'CONT,P~ACTOR HIRED BY THE CITY, CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 June 11, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp Public Works Director Retaining Walls As requested by the Council at their last meeting I have checked with other cities as to their maintenance program on retaining walls. All o£ the cities that I contacted do the maintenance on rctainin9 walls that were installed by a program of city improvement. It would be my recommendation that the Public Works Department take care of the maintenance of all walls installed by a contractor under our current and past road projects. Respectfully, Robert Shanle~ Public Works Director S/jcn /Z 77 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 12, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-208 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land Last week when the Council discussed the tax forfeit land list, it was decided that certain lands should be taken for Wetlands and Streets. Those to be taken for Wetlands are: 14, 15, 16 and 17, Block 12, Avalon 19, Block 24, Seton - PID 19-1i7-23 23 0061 0041 0094 Lot 22, Block 11, Whipple - PID 25-117-24 12 0106 Lots 23 & 24, Block 4, Wychwood - PID 19-117-23 33 0044 Lot 3', Block 14, Mound Terrace - PID 14-117-21 34 0026 A separate resOlution is needed for each item.. To be taken for Streets: Lot 6, Block 34, Wychwood - PID 24-117-24 42 0006 Lots 19, 20 & 1/2 of 18, Block 18, Wychwood - PID 24-117-24 41 0013 One resolution for the two will suffice. 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 12, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-69 SUBJECT: Questionnaire Survey Distributed by Planning Commission Attached is a copy of the questionnaire survey tabUlated by the City Planner. See Pages 1570-1572 for the list of comments on the survey. Leonard L. Kopp A questionnaire which addressed developmental issues facing Mound was dis- tributed by the Planning Con~nission to city residents. Approximately 3,200 questionnaires were sent out to the residents listed 0n the City Hall mailing lists. Three hundred and fifty six surveys were returned to the Planning Commission; consequently, the Commission received input from nearly lO~ of the residents of the community. Not all of the questions were answered by all of the ?espondents; therefore, the total number of responses for each of the questions are not equal. Some individuals chose to answer only certain questions. The survey consisted of nine multiple choice questions and a tenth question asking respondents to make miscellaneous comments about issues concerning them. Questions 1 - 7 were multiple choice questions which asked'the respondents to choose which answer best answered each question. Answers for questions 2 and 7 contained write-in options which were later categorized for statistical purposes. After the subtotals for each option to each question were determined, the percentages of respondents favoring each option were calculated. Ques.tions. 8 and 9 asked respondents to rank seven qualitieS that make Mound a desireable place to live and five community development issues in their order of importance. The Mean Rating was calculated by totalling the numerical ratings assigned each issue and dividing this sum by the total number of responses. Total of ratin~ = Mean Rating ~Total ~espond6nts The issues and qualities with the lowest mean rating were of the greatest con- ern to survey respondents. These issues and qualities were assigned relative ranks in the Survey Summary. A number of interesting and colorful miscellaneous comments were offered by respondents. The topics of concern were quite varied.. Many comments were traffic related, reflecting the ~op priority ranking of traffic patterns as a development issue in question nine. Some respondents offered specific suggestions and sites for improving the roads, cleaning the streets, expanding the bus system, etc.. Some people were quite voicferous, protected by the anonymity of the mail-in survey. One-shortcoming of the mail survey, as opposed to door-to- door interviewing, is that the sample population is not truly random. A higher percentage of people fill out a mail-in survey because they have a complaint to {a7 ' air. Few people would take the time to write in a favorable comment. Reading the miscellaneous comments offers a subjective picture of additional issues concernin§ residents. A variety of cross-tabulations could be calculated should the Planning Commission wish to invest more effort into the survey. For instance, developmental concerns may vary among precincts and age groups. Perhaps families with children felt education to be of a higher development priority. General Summary of Issues The three qualities most commonly sited as making Mound a desireable place to live are environmentally related. The proximity to lakes and the natural environ- mental setting of Mound received the highest priority among respondents. Recreational opportunities in Mound was the third most popular characteristic in the community. Traffic patterns were the most important community issue. Many miscellaneous comments were traffic related. People commented on cleaning the streets, stricter traffic speed controls, and decorating main boulevards. Environmental protection was the second highest priority. The residents, drawn to Mound for environmental reasons (question 8) wish to protect the natural beauty of the community. Many people felt that more money should be invested in the down- town area. Businesses and restaurants should be attracted and the shopping district should be revitalized. PLANNING COMMISSION QUESTIONNAIRE SUMMARY Responses 29 61 101 164 355 310 26 9 Percent 8.1 17.2 28.5 46.2 100.0 90.2 7.3 2.5 1. How long have you lived in Mound? a. less than I year b. 1-3 years c. 4-9 years d. 10 years or longer What type of housing do you occupy? a. own your home b. rent an apartment c. condominium 355 84 104 65 31 20 26 100.0 25.5 31.5 19.7 9.4 6,1 7.8 e Where did you live before occupying your present residence? a. within Mound b. Hennepin County. c. Minneapolis - Saint Paul d. Metro Area e. in Minnesota f. out of Minnesota 330 38 107 110 199 100.0 10.7 30.2 31.1 28.0 4. What is the age of the head of your household? a. under 30 b. 30-39 c. 40-59 d. 60 or over 354 43 33 82 67 55 5O 100.0 13.0 10.0 24.8 20.3 16.7 15.2 5. What..city precinct do you reside in? (You vote at?) a, First - fire station b. Second - Indian Knoll Manor c. Third - Island Park Hall d. Fourth - Seahorse Recreation Building · e. Fifth - Westonka Community Center f. Sixth - Hennepin County Library 330 100.0 78 100 113 ~6 o 22.5 28.8 32.6 16.1 0 6. If you have children living at home, what are their ages? a. preschool b. grade k-6 c. grade 7-12 d. post high school e. foster children 350 100.0 268 23 17 12 14 80.2 6.8 5.2 3'.6 4.2 7. Where would you expect to live in 5 years? a. game house b. different house in Mound c. Metro Area d. In-State e. Out-State 334 100.0 Rank 6 1 5 4 3- 2 Mean Rating 4.95 2.31 4.88 4.37 4.14 2.97 What do you feel makes Mound a good place to live? (please register your priorities 1,2,3,4,5,6,7. in the boxes next to your preference) a. good housing b. close to lake ' c. convenient shopping d. good schools e. recreational opportunities f. natural environment setting 2.81 2.88 3.23 2.57 3.47 e What areas of Community deVelopment need most attention in upc6ming years? (please register your priorities 1,2,3,4,5,6 in the boxes next to your preference) a. environmental protection b. redevelop downtown Mound c. provide better housing opportunity and rehabilitate existing homes d. improve traffic patterns e. improve parks CITY of MOUND June 12, 1979 534t t,fAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNF. SOTA 55364 (612) 4;'2-1155 State Land Department Hennepin County Government Center A-603 Minneapolis, MN. 55487 Subject: 1979'Conservation List Gentlemen: The following 10ts are undersized and the City Council requests that they be withheld from sale: Plat Parcel Lot Block Subdivision PID Reason 37730 3550 10 7 Arden 37850 0975 6 5 Avalon 37870 0560 1 3 Devon 37870 1375 17 4 Devon 37910 7950 17 12 Pembroke 37910 8050 21 12 Pembroke 38010 0096 Pt. of 3 2 . Wychwood 38010 4560 18 '22 Wychwood 38010 5100 1 26 Wychwood 38010 6440 6 34 Wychwood 61580 0750 8 2 Dreamwood 61580 1100 22 2 Dreamwood 61730 2480 Pt.of 12 6 A.Lincoln 61730 2760 P~.of 22 6 61250 4100 38 24-117-24 44 0080 19-117-23 31 0015 30-117.23 22 0013 30-117-23 22 0028 19-117-23 33 0137 19-117-23 33 0139 19-117-23 32 0182 Undersized Private Sale Undersized Undersized Undersized Undersized Private Sale 24-117-24 4~ 0038 Private Sale 24-117-24 41 0072 Undersized 24-117-24 42 0006 Undersized · 13-117-24 12 0017 Private Sale 13-117~24 12 0026 Undersized 13-117-24 31 0038 Undersized Add.Lakeside Pk. " 13-117-24 31 0042 Undersized Subd. Lots 13-117-24 41 0051 Undersized 1-32,Skarp Lindquist's Ravenswood Thanks for your cooperation. Sincerely, Leonard L ' Kopp City Manager cc: City Council MINUTES OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING June 11, 1979 Present were: Acting Chairman Gerald Smith, Commissioners Margaret Hanson, Gary Paulsen, Lorraine Jackson', Harriett Dewey and George Stannard. Also present.were City Manager Leonard L. Kopp, City Planner Charles Riesenberg, City Inspector Henry Truelsen and Secretary Marge Stutsman. MINUTES The minute~ of the May 21, 1979 Planning Commission meeting were presented for consideration. Jackson moved and Hanson seconded a mo~ion to approve the minutes of the May 21 meeting as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. · House Moving and House Size Variance Lots 1 & 15, Block 13, Dreamwood Eric Bodine present. Paulsen moved and Jackson seconded a motion to recommend that variance be granted for moving the undersized house'into Mound. Stannard~moved and Smith seconded a motion to amend the above adding "house be placed on lots s~ as to allow for expansion of the house". The vote on the amended motion was fiv~ in favor, with Smith opposed. Reason-he feels we have enough properties with variances without moving a house in that needs a variance. House & Garage Moving Lots 6 & 7, Block 2, Shirley Hills Unit A Victor Smith present. Hanson moved and Jackson'seconded a motion to recommend approval of the moving permit providing the Police Chief's recommendations are complied with. The vote was unanimously in favor. Workshop The Planner distributed survey results and reviewed them. He will write a press release on results. The Planner presented three alternative land use concepts for review and dis- cussion. Stannard moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to adjourn at 9:25 p.m. The vote was unanimously in favor, so adjourned. Attest: APPLICATION FOR MOVING BUILDING Fee Property Owner: Present Location of House Addition ~ +~ /~ No. ./. d~ Date ~ 9- F79 /['/J7--Phone /-~'9 ~ ~;''~ 17 (~ (Garage) Dimensions: Length% ~ Width ~ ~)Heighth ~/~ Plat Parcel To Be Moved To: Addition Plat Parcel Approved by Bldg. Insp. Name of Owner ~ddress of Owner To Be Moved (out of Proposed Route Phone within ) The City of Mound Time ~!/~/;VI ~ ~f~/ Approved by Police Chief How Long to be on Street Approved by Dir. of Public Works Utilities Notified INSURANCE: Personal Injury (Not less than $100,000.00 for each individual Liability (Not less than $300,000.00) ~ ~o~y ~0~. o ~ Prope~y Damage (Not. less th~n $20,000.00) /~. ~OO c ~ ~ame of Company ~ ~ C~SH BO~:~ ~ ~ ~50.00 for ~ara~e) Deposit o~ ~ to insure against damage to streets. (to be returned if no d~age .done) , $5.00 for garage) FEE: Fee of ~,~ 48 HOURS NOTICE PRIOR TO MOVING STRUCTURE TO BE GIVEN: City Inspector Chief of Police Director of Public Works Make out in triplicate: Original - Bldg. Inspector ic Works CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 8, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-200 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Chestnut Road A public hearing has been called for June 12 to install water and construct a new street east of the present end of Chestnut Road. Preliminary report sent out with Council Memorandum 79-158 on May 8th. · ~ .-~',~--..--~_..-~---~ ~ . .._.~- ,. ~ .... Leonard Lo Kopp {& YY 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 8, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-201 SUBJECT: Pelican Point - Final Plat The final plat of Pelican Point will be before the Council on June 12th. There is very little change from the preliminary plat. Attached is a copy of the resolution on the P.D.A. It appears that all the items in this resolution should be repeated with the addition of the Fire Hydrants shall be placed as indicated by the Fire Chief on Exhibit. April~lS, 1~78 163 Councilmember Withhart moved the following Resolution, RESOLUTION NO. 78-162 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PELICAN POINT WITH CERTAIN STIPULATIONS WHEREAS, application has been made for a Planned Development Area pursuant to Section 23.065 of the City Code, and WHEREAS, said application has been processed by the Planning Commission which has recommended approval and a public hearing has been held before this Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: A Planned Development Area plan for Pelican Point is approved subject to compliance with all of the following conditions: Ao Exhibit A, a copy of which is on file in the City Manager's office, and made a part of this per~it being the Street, Utility and Drain- age Plan prepared by Houston Engineering and dated February 14, 1978. All-utilities shall be constructed pursuant to the plans and spec- ifications approved by McCombs-Knutson & Associates, Inc., herein- after called the City Engineer. All utilities constructed shall be inspected during construction by the City Engineer. Exhibit B,'a copy of which is on file in the City Manager's office, and made apartof this permit being the preliminary Site Plan dated April 11, 1978, showing 13 individual structures numbered 1 through 11 and 26 and 27; and 14 units marked as numbers 12 through 25, being doubles and one building with 4 units attached. All structures and amenities shall be located and constructed pursuant to the final Plat. Exhibit C, a copy of which is on file in the City Manager's office, and made a part of this permit being the Drainage Plan dated April 11, 1978 showing elevations..All excavating and grading shall be pursuant to Exhibit A and C. Prior to any building permits being issued the applicant shall submit and have approved by the City Engineer a final Erosion Plan. Eo All fire lanes shall be designated on a map and approved by the Mound Fire Chief. All fire lane areas shall be marked to prohibit parking or other obstructions on the fire lanes. The developer shall pay cash in lieu of park land dedication, the park dedication shall be in the amount of $23,875.00 pursuant to Section 22.37 of the City Code. The applicant shall pay to the City the sum of $1,000.00 for park dedication at the time they obtain a building permit for each structure or unit until the total amount is paid. The park dedication herein covers all land as shown or described in Exhibit B. The cluster development and zero lot line concept will be incorporated in the final plat of this area. 164 April 18, 1978 The density shall not exceed the amount shown on the plan. No conveyance of property within the PDA Area shall take place until this land is platted pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes 462.358 and Chapter 22 of the City Code. This approval shall be considered preliminary plat approval, a public hearing pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes 462.358 shall be held prior to final plat approval. The escrow account pursuant to Section 23.065, Subdivision 13 is established at $5,500.00, said sum shall be deposited with the City Treasurer prior to the issuance of any building permits. Ko The developer shall provide the City with a corporate surety bond or a letter of credit in form approved by the City Attorney guaranteeing the construction and payment for all street grading, the construction of the drainage pond, all private streets and sanitary sewer and water. improvements pursuant to the plan, said bond shall be in the amount of $148,000.00. All utilities shall be constructed at the developer's sole cost. Lo All water and sewer lines shall be private and shall be maintained by the property owners. 'The City will not take easement for any streets within the project. The streets will be private and maintained by the property owners. The City will cooPerate with the owners in assisting the owners to find contractors to maintain utilities and streets. With the consent of the Council, the City may enter into a contract with the owners to do routine maintenance. Mo P~ior to Final Plat approval or recording, the City Attorney shall ren- der a titl'e opinion and shall review and approve the Homeowners Assoc- iation Articles - By Laws and all covenants and documents. This permit is subject to the applicant obtaining all necessary permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, U.S. Corps of Army Engineers, Department of Natural Resources, Lake Minnetonka Conservation Districe, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Minnesota Department of Health and the applicant shall not embark on any construction requiring a per- mit until said permit has been filed with the City Engineer. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Polston and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Fenstad, Lovaasen, Polston, Swenson and Withhart, the following voted against the same:'none, whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Acting APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND FEE $ 285.00 13 FEE OWNER S Ralph Turnquist Elsie Turnquist Rolf Turnquist PLAT PARCEL · 37930 1215 & 4700 Location and complete legal description of property [o be divided: ~sh~al~ *sland.Park, ,!~t Div_ I~arK, Mouno~ IVll nneso~a Legal Description Attached ZONING To be divided as follows: 27 lots and common area (See attached drawings) (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot No. From Square feet TO Square feet Reason: ADDRESS C/O Lundgren Bros. Construction 18915 9th Avenue North Applicant's interest in the property: Plymouth, Minnesota 55391 Agent for the proposed developer This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the proper ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: That the plat be apprc contingent on approval of the City Staff-City Engineer~ ?ire Chief and Police Chief. TEL. NO. 474-1 231 DATE 5/1 0/79 I1- H /,i MOUND '~TY OF .... Building Inspector, DATE May21r1979 COUNCIL ACTION Resolution No. DATE APPROVAL OF THIS DIVISION IS DEPENDENT ON THE LEVYING OF ANY DEFICIENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS BY WAIVER, THE FILING OF THE DIVISION AS APPROVED AND THE NECESSARY PAYMENTOF TAXESBY THE FEE OWNER WITHIN 1 YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE RESOLUTION OR IT BECOMES NULL AND VOID. A list of residents and owners of property within___~feet must be attached. /& .V,, J~ Itl I HXtl · ~aa~ PTca JO ouTT XT.t~Tn~ %nod oq~ pu~ 'uo~lppy pTt:. '~( ~u~ Z( uo;~TPPY P$~ Jo ~ld oq~ uo p.,~rt~oo2 cT qalq'~ 'uOTSl~]ti'~a~TJ '~ PU~TC[ cdTot~ jo ~.tnd ~q~ osIv 'XalTu 0~,.1.~1 pl~ je ~ull 04% uo poOh. icap ~l qolq~ 'uol::t~l~ ~:~1.1 '4~s'J puulu[ :dTaq{ Jo ~4% o~lY 'u°l~l~lG %CJl~ "~lt'l P"cT~[ mlTo~ '~C puu L( '9( '~C '~l°~Ouulff ~luno3 uldouuoti Joj pu~ utq%l.~ ~PooO jo J~l~l~a~ Jo ootjjo og1 UT pJoo~j jo puv OilJ uo 'uol;lal~ ls~l~ ,Xjvd pu~lSi ~dT~" puo L[ ~gE '~[ ;lo7 jo ouTI ,':[~al~vaqlnos o'4~ uao~,~aq soTl qolqa qsal.{ ~a'd pu~lSI odI.oqd jo ~uld oq~ uT ~oaals o;~Tad oq~ jo qzud osTy '3uluul3aq jo lu~od aql o1 iollu al,alad ,'41 jo OUli ~[lols;,/ ~UO[U u°TluuJTP ,([Jol;onqlnoS v uI O~uottl IXOTi~ alu,tlad agI jo ouT[ 0~ .(alI~ oTual~d Oq% JO auTI ,<[zo%no?, q;o~ oq~ qll~, lallu~d puu oouoql ~puo~ opoxn& pTu~ Jo oulI iljol~u2 oql :o~j llJaqsuaqlno~ ~'98~ uT qulq~ luTod u o~ ~[ p.uv ~ ~°1 ua°~.laq OUlI papualxa plus IOIIv~d ~I~o~uoqlnos o~uo,(~ Ig{ puu ~[ sloq uoaaqoq auli papuo~xo jo Xlaotsuaq~aoN. looj O~ puu qll~ IallvJvd unuJp ouT[ ~ qlia uollaas.:a;: alt o3 pooh opoxn& jo oulI Xlaoq~no~ ot(~ 3UOlU Z[~alsuoql~o,,,, oouoql 'puo. uqoq uoo~%oq oulI popuoqxo pluu ~uoi~ Xlza%so.~qljc,:i oouaq3 i~ pu~ ~ ~1o' plo; uo~n~oq ouT[ 3ulplalp papua~xo pta; 3uoiu pa=r. suam p~oH opaxni ~oaj Xi~aT~wuq~noS %ouj ~'99C ~l luTod qolqa ''~lesout:lH 'X%unoD ulda,:ua; o ~allTi jo jvJ~;13oH oql jo a~lJjO OR% uI pxo0o4 jo puu ailj ua uoIuaY Id oK% UO uaoq9 ;u 'puoH opoxni 3o oulI XlzalsuoqlnoS oqq ol ~1%q3Tud%g g uT p~puolxo 'uoluT.%]~ %saTd '~aud poolsI ;dlaqd JO ~[ puu 9oq uoun~aq oult 3dTpTAlp oR% ua lulod u o~ usoI ~o a Jam ~oaj OOC -qlao~t auuoq% f%u~j OOC JO aouulaSp ~ ~[ %oq pl;~ jo aUTl ll:OqlnoS papua; a p]um 3uolu ~l~ogaanq~ol/ oauoq% '~Tao%gonq%Jo'',, au!I qqglOJ~c ~ ul pop,,o,' -xo 'uolclalg 3;Jl~ ']4~d PU{["I ~dlot;d plus jo ~[ 1o7 JO oulI ~[datllno' oql JO ~I~OlCOA uoT..uolxa oql XR poloo~olu; ~l OCli lla°q~og pl~ aaa,t- oq~ u] pJoDoJ JO pay oilJ ua JOO/aq~ l~id 04% o~ 3ulpaoao~ ,UOl;lalG la/T.{ '~av4 puul~I edlaqd jo quid plva UT.~Oiio oqualad oq~ jo eUll ~lloq~o3 o'll ua %ulod u ~v 3uluul3o~ :%'ln-°l ';aol[oJ au paqlxasop [C o3uu~ 'LIT -ua°i '6t u°lqooS '~ 1ol luo~u~a~o9 Jo l~ud lug1 oslV }'la'Ii~ alVxl~d'bf¥'s aull XlJo390A %9om oq~ puu 'uol%lppv pl.~ '9[ po. L~ '9~ '~ ~loq UaOnlaq °J°'l~ oPT~ Zlaa3s°~ 049 Po°Iv coT[ qalqa 'gOlIU o~,l~d ~ uv uolllppv pta:; JO 3u]d ag% ua po%vuOl~op 6T qoltln 'uolsl~I(l %U~l,{ ''<aud puu[9[ sdlaq,{ jo %zud %vq% ouly 'uololalq %u~lA ']~ud puulsI sdtoq,i '~ pu~ L[ '9[ '~ $~ofs ' " V tl~l~l~t ' " ::-- uotldt~*sa~ I{8'o~ .~aXnit s~ ''DNI 'NOI&DIIH.I. SNOD 'SOttfl NHHDGNflq pu~ !SaallaS sv '&SlflONltfl& 'bi AqOll pue ~ISqa '£SI~0NMfl& 'D Hdq¥lt uoomloq poe Xq luatuoo.~¥ uotldo al ¥ ltqtqx3 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA FOR PELICAN POINT WllEREAS, application has been made for a Planned Development Area pursuant to Sec. 23.065 of the City WHEREAS, said application has processed by he Planning Commission which has recommer approval and a pu ic hearing has been held before this 1, NOW THEREFORE BE IT ED by the City Coun 1 of the City of Mound: A Planned ~velopment Area plan fo Pelican Point is approved subject to compl with all of the fol ng conditions: A. Exh t A, attached made a part of this .~mit being the ~treet, Utility an inage Plan prepared by~uston Engineerlng'~nd dated Febru~ 1£, 1978. All utilities /~'hall be constructe'~ursuant t/~('t plans and specifications ~a~proved by McCombs-Knutsb~k~& As~Sciates Inc. hereinafter/~calledltl~e City Engineer. All util'lxt~e's constructed shall b~e~ir(~ectedld¥ing construction by the//~ngineer. ~-~)~ ~')// B. Exhibit B, atJT~ched hei~to ~d~ma'~e_¥1~art of ~this i~e~nit being the Site P/l/an dated Ap~l I~1,~X~1~7_8 showing 1]~ indi~¥ual structures ~o gh~l ~-26 and 27; an_c~ 14 u~r~/l~s marked as ~, b~ing do~ubles ~and ~ne bt~j~)lding with 4 uni t~truc~ures_L,~q~ ani~r~t/~.~ f?\shal~[ be l~cated anyconstructed pursuant tXEx~bi~//~ B~ ~ C. Exh~to and m~eX~z~l~a~rt ~_ hi~_permit being th/~ ~~p ~ 978 sl howl! .g..e~evations. All ex~vating and g~ding shal_l b~ ~ur~.ant to ~xl:ibi I~A and C. D. Pr~o~ng permits being issued the applicant shall submit and have approved by the City Engineer a final Erosion Plan. E. All fire lanes shall be designated on a map and approved by the Mound Fire Chief. All fire lane areas shall be marked to prohibit parking or other obstructions on the fire line areas. F. The developer shall pay cash in lieu of park land dedication, the park dedication shall be in the amount of $23,875.00 pursuant to Section 22.37 of the City Code. The applicant shall pay to the City the sum of $1,000.00 for park dedication at the time : they obtain a building permit for each structure until the total amount is paid. G. The cluster development and zero lot line concept will be incorporated in the final plat of this area. The density shall not exceed ~he amount shown on the plan. I. No conveyance of property within the PDA Area shall take place until this land is platted pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes 462.358 and Chapter 22 of the City Code. This approval shall 5e considered preliminary plat approval, a public hearing pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes 462.358 shall be held prior to final plat approval. J. The escrow account pursuant to Section 23.065, Subdivision 13 is established at $5,500.00, said sum shall be deposited with the City Treasurer prior to the issuance of any building permits. K. The developer shall provide the City wi th a corporate surety bond or a letter of credit in form approved by the I:ity Attorney guaranteeing the construction and payment for all street grading, the construction of the drainage pond, all private streets and sanitary sewer and water improveme,~ts pursuant to the plan, said bond shall be in tile amount of $148,000.O0. All utilities shall be constructed at the L. The mai~anita.ry s_ewer and ~ter line - designated as the late~ system bY_~he City E~gineer - shall be designated by eas~ent~o b~edicated to,,¢he City prior to recording any ~nal plat. S~d easements~shall be a minimum width of te~~~ either side of the utility lin~. The Ho~ners Association dg~uments shall provide ~at the gi~y ma~espass over all common areas if neceSSary to ge~to ~t~ies~ The City Will not take e~'~ments for any~eet~hin the project, the streets will,lEe private an~ ma~~ thep[r~perty owners, The sa9i~a~y sewer and v~r ~ts sbmll provide a hold harmles~greement wherein the ~o~wners within the PDA agree ~at the ~ity of Mound wH1 ~be responsible for mainta~ing said lateral s~er an~er ~es, and further provid~g that th~ty o~. ~~11 not_~respons~ble for any ~amage to ~la~~~andscapin~ruc~ures, streets lo,other day, rom w~er l in~eaks or ne~ess~r~ yepaJrs or ~o sanitary sewer~ater ~. ~ ~ater st~~t~a~ ~ de~ ~ated t~nts wi~l~ded~d a~d recorded p~~i~~e_~~the ~nal' plat, All ~~' ho~~ss ~gr~ements' s~be i ncorporat~ ~ t~e~Homeo~ A~ocia~ion docum'ents. M. Prior to Final P approval .or recording the City Attorney shall render a title opinion and shall review and approve the ' Homeowners Association Articles - By Laws and all covenants and documents. N. This permit is subject to the applicant obtaining all necessary permits from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, U. S. Corps of Army Engineers, Department of Natural Resources, Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Minnesota Department of Health and the applicant shall not embark on any construction requiring a permit until said permit has been filed with the City Engineer. Adopted by the City Council this day of , 1978. 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 8, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-204 SUBJECT: Rezoning - Lots 19 & 20, Auditors Subdivision 170 & Lots 28-32, The Bartlett Place Upper Lake Mtka. The Council continued this rezoning hearing to June 12, 1979. Attached is a copy of a letter received regarding this rezoning. Leonard L. Kopp ~ ~(/;.~ June 7, 1979 Honorable Mayor Lovaasen Members of City Council Attn: Leonard Kopp, City Manager We are in favor of the proposed rezon!n~ to single family dwelling. for the beachside area behind Lakewood Lane. We will not be able to attend the continual hearing on June 12th. However, we want to register our opinion to you, the Manager, and the City Council.' Sincerely, Fred J. Hanle~ Dr. Way~ H. Smith /d. 37 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 6, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-193 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Recommendation Attached is a copy of the Planning Commission minutes. quire Council action. Item 1. The following re- Subdivision of Land Lots 4,5,~ and 15,'Block 15, Seton Zoned Residential B - 6,000 Square Feet for Single Family Residence The Planning Commission recommended the subdivision be granted. The Administration concurs. The resulting parcels will be: Parcel A: Lots 15~ 16, 17 and 18, Block 15 - 12,800 Square Feet Parcel B: Lots 4, 5 and'~6, Block 15 - 9,600 Square Feet 2. Final Plat - Pelican Point This Public Hearing has been called for June 12th. Side Yard Variance/Non-conforming Use Lot 14, Block 3, Shirley Hills Unit B Zoned Residential A-1 The Planning Commission recommended the 1.1 foot side yard variance so the remodeling can be accomplished. The new addition will be within legal setbacks. The Administration concurs in the recommenda- tion. Front Yard Variance Lot 4, Block 2, The Bluffs Zoned'A-1 The Planning Corm~ission recommended "that we approve this variance and also consider vacating some unused portion of cul-de-sac (bubble) taking into account minimum front yard footages for Lots 2, 3 and 4. The Administration concurs and suggests the Engineer be requested to suggest the'area that can be vacated. Street Vacation Devon Lane from Carrick Road to Longford Road The Planning Commission recommended granting a 13 foot street front variance.of Dev0n Lane because at the present time, Devon Lane is an unimproved right-of-way and all ingress and egress shall be for any and all proposed structures off of Carrick Road. The probability of any internal building site that could be served off of Devon Lane could at sometime in the future deny public access to that site. Council Memorandum No. 79-193 Planning Commission Recommendations - Page 2 Item 7. House Size Variance House Moving Permit Lots 1 and 15, Block 13, Dreamwood Zoned Residential B The Planning Commission recommended approval of the house moving an and recommended the house size variance. The ordinance requires 840 square feet in a house and the one to be moved has 776 square feet. A difference of 64 square feet. The Planning Commission may change their recommendation at.the June 11 meeting. House Moving permit Lots 6 and 7, Block 2, Shirley Hills Unit A Zoned Residential B The Planning Commission will consider this on June 11. MINUTES OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 21, 1979 Present were: Chairman Russell Peterson, Commissioners George Stannard~ Gary Paulsen, Lorraine Jackson, Margaret Hanson, Gerald Smith; Council Representa- tive Gordon Swenson; City Manager Leonard L .KOpp arrived from another meeting at 8 p.m.; City Inspector Henry Truelsen and Secretary Marg~ Stutsman. MINUTES The minutes of the May 7, 1979 and May 14, 1979 Planning Commission meetings were presented for consideration. Jackson moved and Smith seconded a motion to accept the minutes of the May 7th meeting as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Hanson moved and Jackson seconded a motion to accept the minutes of the May 14th meeting as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. BOARD OF APPEALS 1. Subdivision of Land Lots 4, 5, 6 and 15, Block 15, Seton Nicholas & Frankie Evanoff, Applicants. Richard Meyer, owner of Lots 16, 17 and 18, and who plans to add this lot to his, was present. Jackson moved and Hanson seconded a motiOn to recommend to the Council that subdivision be granted. The vote was'unanimously in favor. Subdivision of Land/Final Plat Metes & Bounds Description, Phelps Island Park, First Division Roger Conhaim, Agent for Turnquist and Lundgren Bros. Construction was present. Mr. Conhaim presented an overview of. the proposal for subdivision of land/ final plat. Minor changes made--essentially same plan with designated individual lots (planned units) in a private development'with common areas. Smith moved and Jackson seconded a motion to recommend that the plat be approved contingent on approval of the City Staff--City Engineer, Building Inspector, Fire Chief and Police Chief. Discussed. Concern of possible hazard of having school bus stopping on Tuxedo. The vote on the motion was unanimously in favor. Side Yard Variance Lot 14, Block 3, Shirley Hills Unit B Dwight Larson present. Smith moved and Stannard seconded a motion to recommend approval of ~%e non-conforming use/side yard setback. The vote was unanimously in favor. Planning Commission Minutes May 21, 1979 - Page 2 o Front Yard Variance Lot 4, Block 2, The Bluffs Ron Bastyr was present for Dale Sherburne, Also present was Marjorie Peterson~ owner of Lot 5, who is concerned about elevations and drainage; further asked that her letter (included ~ Exhibit A) be made a matter of record. Stannard moved and Smith seconded a motion to recommend to Council that we approve this variance and also consider vacating some unused portion of cul-de-sac'(bubble) taking into account minimum front yard footages for Lots 2, 3 and 4, The vote was unanimously in favor. See after Item 6. 6o Street Vacation - Devon Lane from Carrick Road to Longford Road Robert Winkler and Dave Moore, Realtor, present requesting vacation so proposed duplex can front on Carrick Road and have sufficient side yard. Discussed. An alternative was proposed as follows: Smith moved and Jackson seconded a motion to recommend Uranting a 13 foot street front variance of Devon Lane because &t the present time, Devon Lane is unimproved right-of-way and all ingress and egress shall be for any and all proposed structures off of Carrick Road. The probability' of any internal building site that could be served off of Devon Lane could at sometime in the future deny public access to that site. The vote on motion was unanimously in favor. Non-conforming Use/Undersized Lot Lot 5 and E. 10 ft. of Lot 6, Block 37, Wychwood Ms. Martens wishes to move building on lot to meet setbacks and straighten house out on lot. Inspector asked clarification of whether she needed to apply for variance; Planning Commission advised Inspector that she would need to reapply. Eric Bodine present proposing to move house from Hopkins area to Lo~ 1.& 15, Block 13, Dreamwood. His~plans include bringing house up to code to live in except'he does request house size variance of 64 square feet. Request made at this time without formal application as there is a limited amount of time in which to get this house~moved from present site. House has been inspected by Building Inspector. Jackson moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to recommend variance for undersize of structure be waived and structure be placed so further expansion can be accomplished and still comply with existing setbacks. Discussed. Chairman asked Staff to take care of application acceptance. Hanson moved and Jackson seconded a motion to amend motion saying that variance can be changed at June llth meeting, if after looking at site, etc., they so desire. The vote on amendment was all in favor except Smith who abstained. Vote on motion as amended was Smith abstained; all others voted in favor. Planning Commission Minutes May 21, 1979 - Page 3 Side Yard Setbacks Stannard reopened discussion on side yard setbacks. Has reservation about action taken on May 14th--particularly whether it is equitable. Mayor I~Dvaasen, who was present, was asked for his co~nents. Discussed having special meeting on side yard setbacks - Council and Planning Comanission. Smith moved and Stannard seconded a·motio~'to adjourn the meeting. Vote was unanimously in favor, so adjourned. May 21, 1979 ~Exhibit A -. From: Re: Planning Commission, Mound, Mn. Marjorie. Peterson and Henri G.P. He~$tek 6501 Bayridge Rd. [Lot 5, Blk. 2,'The Bluffs] Proposed house by Dale Sherburne Lot.4,-Block 2, The Bluffs We are conditionally providing no objection to Mr. Sherburne's request for a variance to the front yard setback requirement wherein he would be able to build ten feet from the present front boundry. We are however, concerned about the elevations of his lot and proposed houge relative to our property since there is an intricate drainage system and steep slopes with close.proximity of the houses. We are requesting that a survey with elevations be developed and approved by both parties~ the building inspector, the planning commission:if appropriate and the Halstead-Crest Committee (as per covenants) which includes: 2. 4. Lot lines Finished grade elevations at the lot corners and building corners. Showing drainage swails with elevations indicated there on for bo-th lots. Showing existing grade at corners of the residence at 6501 Bayridge Rd. REVISED AGENDA FOR MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 21~ 1979 7:30 P.M. Minutes of May 7~ 1979 and May 14, 1979 BOARD OF APPEALS Nicholas G. & Frankie E? Evanoff~ 4739 Carlow Road Lots 4, 5, 6 and 15, Block 15~ Seton - Map 7 Subdivision of Land Turnquist Property/Roger Conhaim~ Agent Metes & Bounds Description, Phelps Island Park~ First Division - Map 13 Subdivision of Land Dwight J. Larson, 5053 Avon Drive Lot 14, Block 3, Shirley Hills Unit B Side Yard Variance - Map 8 Dale Sherburne, 6511 Bayridge Road Lot 4, Block 2, The Bluffs - Map 10 Front Yard Variance o Wanda Martens, 4961 Bedford Road Lot 5 and E. 10 ft. of Lot 6~ Block 37, Wychwood - Map 12 Non-conforming Use/Undersized Lot Robert Winkler Street Vacation from Carrick Road to Longford Road - Map 7 /&31 City of Mound Mound, Minnesota From: To: Subject: City Inspector Plannlng Commission Board of Appeals - 5-21-79 Nicholas G. & Frankie E. Evanoff, 4739 Carlow Road Lots 4, 5, 6 & 15, Block 15, Seton - Subdivision of Land No problem with this req.uest, existing structures on property meet the re- quired setbacks. Turnqulst Property/ Roger Conhaim, Agent Metes & Bounds, Phelps Island Park, 1st Div. Subdivision of Land No comment, well covered in previou§ meetings Dwight J. Larson, 5053 Avon Drive Lot 14, Block 3, Shirley Hills Unit B - Side Yard Variance .- Note previous variances and.resolution of nonTconformi.ng use (enclosures 7 ) Can see no problem in allowing expansion or addition provided there are no further encroachments or setbacks other than existing. Dale Sherburne, 6511Bayridge Road Lot 4, Block 2, The Bluffs, Front Yard Variance Can see no problem in granting street front variance of 25 feet, particularily due to the Onimproved right-of-way that the City does not intend to improve as it would create drainage problems and egress problems to the existing platted lots. This may be an opportune time for the City to consider vacating the un- used portion of this bubble right-of-way. Wanda Martens, 4961 Bedford Road Lot 5 and East 10 ft of Lot 6, Block 37, Wychwood, Non-conforming Use Would like to explain the intent of the proposal as ! have some doubts about the wording on th6 previous resolution relative to off street parking and a proposed garage site. HT/dd eric: Henry Truelsen CITY OF, APPELATION FOR SUBDIVISION Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND OI~LAND FEE :;;36-,00 PARCEL Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: ZONING To be divided as follows: (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot No. From Square feet TO Square feet Reason: MOUND 'est in the property: This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: That subdivision be granted. DATE May 21~ 1979 COUNCIL ACTION Resolution No. DATE APPROVAL OF THIS DIVISION IS DEPENDENT ON THE LEVYING OF ANY DEFICIENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS BY WAIVER, THE FILING OF THE DIVISION AS APPROVED AND THE NECESSARY PAYMENTOF TAXESBY THE FEE OWNER WITHIN I YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE RESOLUTION OR IT BECOMES ,NULL AND VOID. A list of residents and owners of property within feet must be attached. Plat of S~vey for ~ick O. Evanoff of Lot~ 4, 5, 6, and 1~., ~lock 15~ Satori H.,mep~.~ ~un~y, ~'H:mesota 'e C,II~LOw ROAD O-ALWAY' Certificate of Survey: . I here~¢ certify that this is ~ true an_~. correct Sentatfon of a survey of the ho,~udaries of ~ts 4, 5, 6,' and 15, Block 15, Se%on, and of %he location of ~l buil(~ings %hereon, ~md ~11 visible' encrozcbJzen%s, if ~y, from or on s~td l~n[~. Scal~: 1" = 40' ~rcon R. ~ffin Reg~. 606~ ~e : 5-15-72 ~nd Surveyor und o :. ~on marker ~ng ~<~., [-~nnesota APPLICATION FO~ARIANCE CITY OF MOUND FEE $ NAME OF APPLICANT J~W '5' ~.'~- Address ~---~ ~ VO/~J Telephone Number ~-/3J-~/ PROPERTY ADDRESS ~ PLAT ~[~O/d;' LOT /¥ ADDITION ~.~///~ L~T' PARCEL /~00 BLOCK ~ INTEREST IN PROPERTY FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Addre s s Telephone Number VARIANCE REQUESTED: YARDFRONT [ FT.I ACCESSORY BUILDING YARD lo; FT. LOT SIZE REAR[ I LOTSQ. YARD FT, FOOTAGE NOTE: N. C.U.* or OTHER (describe) REASON FOR REQUEST: ~/~ /}gl /] fZ~/~/l-zw 0~- ~--~ ~AzD ~z04~7_2)' Z//~f ~-0 1. Attach a survey AND scale, drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. 2. Give ownership and dimensions of ~djoining property. Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing. 3. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward re que st. 7%#1Y BE FY oq¥-- ,'-7 /oC '' ~ ~ ~b~g permit must be applied for within one year from the date of the [ [[~, [,%.~-~i. dl~[~ solution or variance g~anted becomes null ~nd void. I ~i~Ug-'['l V~ria~e[ are not~ransferable. -- ~AN~NG CO~SS~ON ~O~~ATION A2~o~aZ o~ t~e ~o~-co~o~g use/s~e ~A~ Hay 2Z, ~979 COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO. DATE *non-conforming use /& 1 7 · Land Surveyor Civil £n~ineer I AT OF SURVE' 13907 Spdn~: Lake Road* Hopkins, Minn. 55343 OF PROPERTY OF ,, LOCATIO. '5053 Avon Drive, },~ound, Minnesoba DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS Block,, 3~ ,Shirley Hills Unit B, Hennepin Count~, Minnesota 0 CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION OF BUILDING I hereby certify that on 19 I made a su~ey of the location of lhe building(s) on the above described prol:~rty and that the location of said building(s) is correctly shown on the above plat. .S'ca/e .' ./ /.;'ro~ .. 5,'0 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I hereby certify that on ~ t~~ __19.~0__ I surveyed the property described above and that the above plat is a correct representation of said survey. ROY J. HANSEN, REGISTERED SURVEYOR NO. 6274 .. '. . Frt Blk 40, WyohwO~Plat ~8010, Parcel 7220 Division Basse moved, Weiland seconded.to recommend m0yin house 0nt exizting foundation and divide into two sites with easement for access, sewer, water and driveway. Passed unanimousl~r. WillaardHillier, 1~1 Canary Lane ' Lots 1,2,~,4,5,28,29,~0, Block ~, Woodland Point .t~r~man moved andBasse, secondgd to 8~an$ a 6~in link fence with v~oe .'.., to 48 inChes.to keep out dogs. Passed~u,~. . _. .. Welled moved, ~sse seceded to ~o~nd to add a be~oom on. top.~d~ve a ~ey. ~assed~ous~. '. 10. ~iscussion ~a~bara Heyman .:.. Lots 5 & 6, Ska~p's East Lawn ;,. .:. "' ... Fehce Variance . Oberdeck moved and Schmidt seconded to grant a financial 'ha~dship for a -- fence variance to a 'Standard height' (48 inches), . (A ~2" fence ha~ to be ~' ,-f '-- Passed un uimou. . , ~randenBu~g.& Son, 6619 Bartlett ~oulevard' ':. '" Lot 1~, Ska~p & Lindquists Ravens~ood Sub of Lots'l& ~2 llon-Conforming Requested to tear down old non-conforming duplex and build a new. duplex in Residential A-2. Oberdeck.moved and Bargman seconded to recommend that ..... " LOt 19 and vacated alley be zoned to Residential B provided one sewem unit ~nd lateral footage be picked up, and that. a oi~oulated..petitio_n...be ]r~esented to the Council, Passed unanimously,' . '.. Discussion on amending ordinance on frost'footings. Hasse moved an~ Weiland seConded to recommend amending, ordinance to requiMe' . frost footings for build~.s within 14 feet of house, l~andenbu~g, Weilan. d, ~cl~aidt, ~asse'voted~ye. Ba~and. Oberdeok ~oted ~ay. Passed. Attests... '. i U I I ; I I · I I I o I I ~07o$ ~ ~ I I I I I · ~ t 0 I ~.1 '1 I. ! I' ! I /.7 k NOTE:' ..... - . ..-.:L.':' i.- .. .; .':.~.'~..;'...,' ,'. .., . . .'. .... ,-..: .. .. ..,. .. ., . ' .., . - · -.'.~i ...' ,...3.,.,..; ~ '~.'; ;% r. ' ".'." ...;' '.~.;'.' ?;," "-.'-',; ' :. · ' ' ~. '' ' -.- '. ' : ..- '. ' . '.~ '-- ;-' ; ' ' %-'--...;-~--.2 -. ..". . .t'..... ' '. .'~ : . ,' '".;'-. '., -. '"..'.';:'.'~.' ...: '~ . ~ . . . .: '. ' '. - : .' ' -' '-' .'.: ....... .-.; '-7.' · '"{...: . , . :.. :[";,'~;: ," -. ?: . ' ..' , ;.'. ', **- :' ,: '-:'-.. ,~, ;- - ~. ~ ,- ~, ,~ ~- ~,~ e,' -' - .". ," ,~-~ .'. .... :v. '?:..-:'No su'evey to show setback of netzhbopiug p~ooez-ty'. '."':' ,¢~ .... ".'...'-' ' 7' . . f: '-.". ';: ".':.'.-'., iL:".!:: O ' O OD ~ & ' ' ' '" ' '" ' ' : . .':'-',.: ..' -:.:'.,:...': ..'.:..:';...,;/ :.;..: , :.:-.'..L.-.O~n. ~ ..be .s ~.d. a _ a~ooo~yo. /.......-..: ... ....... - :-- -. .. . ..-~e~ .... I~q o% peqo'e%%~ eq o% e:z:~ov.a:~ea:ec~rta pu-e e~--'s~ -."el~O~% · ,. ~o uo~3or=3euoo eq~ ~,.oz~e o% ~:e~=o u~ =eou~-~.z~z~. ~ZT~O~Zo$ . '-'.:.. 60I-I~ 'OH t[OIa~OS~ll REBOLUTION NO. 71-110 RESOLUTION CRABTIN~ FROBT AND BIDE YARD VARIANCES (Lot 14, ~look ], Bhirley Hills Unit B) the owner of Lot 14, Block 5, Shirley Hills Unit B has m~de application for e, variance in order to place a garage on his lot, an~ the Planning Commission has recommended that he Be ~ranted.%he followin~ variances in order %e Allow the construction of-a ' tuokun~ garage and superstructure to Be ~ttache~ to his hou~ ' · One foot, 2 inches on Easterly lot line One foot, 9 inches on Westerly lot line The front yard se%back be not less than 18 feet from the ro~d right-of-way, ~0W, TH~KFO~, lie IT RESOLYED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF NOU~D., MOU~D, ........ "'-::,."*-'-'One foot, 2 inches on F~sterly lot line One foot, 9 inches on-Westerly lot line ..* .-.. The front yar~ setback Be 16 feet froa road ri~t- - Of va)r. 'the Council thi~ l~th day of April, .;% ;G :. CITY OF MOUND ZONING [- / PROPERTY ~~~~ ,. ADDRESS ~, J'~// NAME OF A~PLICANT ,D ~ ~ J~,-~ ~ ~ ~ PLAT ~,.~/,~O . PARCEL ~/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LOT ~ BLOCK .~ ', ~elephone ~ ~ INTEREST IN PROPERTY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Address ~~~Y ~- .... Telephone Number VARIANCE REQUESTED: NOTE: FRONTx/] FT.I ACCESSORYI FT.I YARDz\~ ~O BUILDING SIDE FT.] I FTJ YARD LOT SIZE , YARD FT LOT SQ. 1 FOOTAG~-Y~'~t ¢~ .-~'~, .. N. C. U."".' or 1. Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. Z. Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property. Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing. 3. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward request. OTHER (describe) REASON FOR REQUEST: :rmit mus~t.,be applied for within ope year from the date of the ~tion or/~[iance grantedr, be comels null and void. e not trAr~,~fe~bl¢.~ / )'~ f .~ ' ~' ~ Sign~-t~e" ~ '1 PLANNING COMMISSION RE COMMENDATION APPROVE THIS VARIANCE AND ALSO CONSIDER VACATING SOME UNUSED PORTION OF CUL-DE- SAC(bubble) DATE May 21, 1979 COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO., DATE *non-conforming use /L / & he 5horelin~ / 014¢/vfinn~¢°ngO/ Ho l~ te d Boy LAKE MI/VNETON. ~{~ McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES; INC.. ;: '.:-~5~)-... -, .))..) ~. [';~. ,:°,,,'.,,,,"~ ,,~'",,", - '.'"" ""'""°"' - "" '"'"" ' May Zi~ 1979 To: From' Planning Commission, Mound, Mn. Marjorie Peterson and Henri G.P. Heystek 6501 Bayridge Rd. [Lot 5, Blk. 2, The Bluffs] Proposed house by Dale Sherburne Lot 4, Block 2, The Bluffs We are conditionally providing no objection to Mr. Sherburne's request for a variance to the front yard setback requirement wherein he would be able to build ten feet from the. present front boundry. We are however, concerned about the elevations of his lot and proposed house relative to our property since there is an intricate drainage system and steep slopes · with close proximity of the houses. We are requesting that a survey with elevations be developed and approved by both parties, the building inspector, the planning commission~if appropriate and the Halstead-Crest Committee (as per covenants) which includes: 1. Lot lines 2. Finished grade elevations at the lot corners and building corners. 3. Showing drainage swails with elevations indicated there on for both lots. 4. Showing existing grade at corners of the residence at 6S01 Bayridge Rd. # Survey for: JOHN D. STEICHEN DESCRIPTION: I WATERSHED DISTRICT ._ . -.~; ~ David H. Coch~an. Pres. · H. Dale Palmatier. Albert I. Lehman . James S. Russell · Jean Williams · June 5, 1979 Mr. Dale W. Sherburne 3018 Bluffs Lane Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Permit Application No. 79-63 Location: The Bluffs, Mound, Minnesota Purpose: Setback Variance Dear Mr. Sherburne: At its meeting on May 31, 1979, the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District reviewed the subject per- mit application. It approved the permit as requested with the following conditions: It approved the permit for a variance allowing for a lakeshore setback of 60 feet. Such distance shall be measured fr~m the Ordinary High Water Level established for the lake of 929.4 NGVD. 2. Subject to final approval by the City of Mound. All work shall be done in a manner to prevent erosion and siltation both during and after construction in accordance with the M.C.W.D. guidelines, a copy of which is enclosed. Permits are valid for one year. Please contact us at 473-4224 when the project is about to commence so an inspector may view the work in progress. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District Eugene A. Hickok, P.E. I APPLICATION FOR ,q" ' ,. iREE~. VACATION CITY OF' MOUND APPLICANT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OI,' PROPERTY OWNED BY APPLICANT: /,~ :y,.5'"' PLAT3 ~c~_~-~p___PARCEL~/_2 .~'- STREET '£O BE VACATED J~X~_J~9/~// ~-. ~, ~f -- -Ffo~ ,~ ~,~ ~Y~ Y~ /~- _ SIGNATUPd~ OF APPLICANT Address.~ Aploli. cant's Interest: in Property ._~~_~___)~__~'~ Residents and owners of property abutting the street to be vacated: Recommended by Utilities: NSP X ; Minnegasco ~ ; Continental Tel. X Reconunended by City: Pu!01J c Works X ; Fire Chief w- ; Engineer ~ ; Police Chief ~ . ,,, , A. '-,-2.. -,.,., z ..... I- - Planning Conm~.ission Re~o~endat.ion: Grant a 13 foot street front variance of Devon Lane (see Planning Co~ission minutes) and ail ingress and egress shall be Date _M_ay..2_1_3_ .1979 Council Action Resol. No. Date /a// CITY OF MOUND. March 30, 1979 We, the undersigned, hereby petition the City of Mound, the vacation of~.i~l~ Devon Lane north of CarSick Rd. for 1055 E. Wayzatf: t]~.mlevard, Wayz~ta, MN 55391 2342 Commeme ~,~ulevard, Mo J~ d, MH 55354 H:~;:,~ltine Gah~ Offise Bldg., Ch;~ka, MN 55318 (612) 475-2426 (612) ~ (612) 448-4355 .? 70 71 81 '" 78" · 77 r,~ 75 76 ,~ LONGFORD ROAD i[(~ ! ROAD 4- GALWAY ROAD 18 tO ROSCOMMON ROAD ;AVAN 8/.9 ~10. --C--o~d~125 J 21 22 2~ NAME OF APPLICANT APP LICA TION FOOARIANCE CITY OF MOUND Address ,,,h/o- FEE zoneD, PROPERTY PLAT PARCEL INTEREST IN PROPERTY ~ ~c LOT / ~a/,~ Telephone Number ~ ~" 7?~FADDITION B LOCK FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Address Te le phone Number VARIANCE REQUESTED: FRONT I I ACCESSORYI YARD FT. BUILDING NOTE: FT..I SIDE YARD I FT..[ LOT SIZE [ FTJ REAR I [ LOTSQ. YARD FT. FOOTAGE 1, Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets, 2. Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property. Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing. 3. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward N. C. U.* or OT~R (describe) REASON FOR REQUEST: 'ID i IJ JUT? ~, co~nCii ~r~;l~J;J J ri [vlAY rmit must be applied for within one year from the date of the .tion or variance granted becom,,es null and void. not traDsferable, ~/~ -'~ Ci~ OF MOUND Signature House ~ovin~ ~er~it ~ill be at ~ meeting. ~ ~ ~pplicant is ~ettin~ mover to determine route, etc. /~' DATE Denotes Iron Monument \%~/~'-'~ /% I hereby certify that this is a true a'~'~°'rrect representa/~6'h~ a survey of t<'~ndaries of: Lots I & 15, B].ock 13, DREAM,'fOOD, Henneuin County, Minnesota And of the location of all buildings, thereon, and all visible encroaCh%htS. land. Assurveyed by methis [st dayof June 1~ /'//4,~./~¢ Land Surve' .;t :;c'.,, ~0 I'l .... ":::"~=2~:'"~,Mcr '~COMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ~?{~J_/~ ~ if ~,VL'T~ or on sai~ ::~ ., ~ ,. ,:.. . /. .~ . .. 2.!yin C, ~.~ :na.,c ~or, Minn. Reg. No. 2. 8 3 7. .CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for ERIC BODINE ~ No.JO ~ APPLICATION FOR MOVING BUILDING Fee Property Owner: l/~ C1(-..}% ,~-~_. S/'~t'~: Address .:' . ~ Phone ~/-- %~ ~ C~) ~resent Looatlon of ~o~se (Garage) Dimens~ons: nength~ Wla~k~ ~elgnth To Be Moved To: Addition J//~/fi Plat ~ t~.0 W//~' ~,~ A Lot ~ Parcel. A q ~ Address of Owner ~¢ 2'~ ~C3/' t1< H To Be Moved (out of Proposed Route within 7 Blook Approved by Bldg. Insp.~ Phone ) The City of Mound From north on County Road 110 to Countv Road 15 - East to Mont~.lair .. . 'and South to Lots 6.& 7, Block 2, Shirley Hills Unit A Time 1:30 A.'M. to 5 A,M. Approved by Police chief Utilities Notified How Long to be on Street Approved by Dir: of Public Works INSURANCE: Personal Injury (Not less than $100,000.00 for each individual) Name of Company CaDadian National Ins. Liability (Not less than $300,000.00) YeS . Name of Company Canadian National Property Damage (Not less than $20,000.00) Yes Name of Company. ~anadian National Yes CASH BOND: . . Deposit of $ 300.00 (to be returned if no damage done) FEE: ($50.00 for house Fee of $ ~_~., ~ ($250.00 for house $50.00 for garage) 48 HOURS NOTICE PRIOR TO MOVING STRUCTURE TO BE GIVEN: to insure against damage to streets. $5.00 for garage)~'~ i "i "/¢:, '1111 OF MOUND ,!~of City Inspector Chief of Police/J~/~- , see attached memo.) Director of Public Work~/ Make out in triplicate: Oriqinal - Bldg. Inspector; Copies to Police Dept. & Public Works CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 May 30, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp - City Manager Charles Johnson - Chief of Police House Move Requested by House ~mer, Victor C. Smith It is recommended Bill Otting, the moving contractor for the house being moved to Shirley Hills Unit A addition lot 6 & 7 be required to comply with the following special conditions: Pravide for at least two special traffic control people. They will be needed to reroute traffic at various locations because the roadway is too narrow for even one lane of traffic in addition to the house. The police department can provide this service at a rate of $15.21 per hour per man with a 4 hour minimum per man. 2. The house should be moved on Sunday thru Thursday only between the hours of 1:30 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. 3. Provide notice to the police department one week prior to the move. Respectfully, Mound Police Department CJ/sh ai~ERTIFICATE OF SURV~I( FOR; ~, ~]l ( ]~ ~o, ~]~) ] ]~/ o Denotes iron monument Proposed lowest floor elev. = D Denotes offset ~ake ~ & g . x ooo.o Denotes existing elev. ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ Proposed top of foundation el~. = (ooo.o ) Denotes Proposed elev. ~ ~ ~¢ BENCH MARK: , Denotes surface drainage ~ ~ Proposed garage floor elev.= I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of File No. the boundaries of the above descried land and of the location of all buildings, DEMARS- GABRIBL if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. 8030 Harbor Lane No. ' ,' ./ / Plymouth MN 55441 ~~'~ ~/~~;([ :~ '' Scale P~one: (6~ 2) 559-0908 ~ &";" 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 7, 1979 'COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-197 SUBJECT: Industrial Revenue Bonds The Jude Candy and Tobacco Company are interested in acquiring a larger warehouse. They have located a building and wish to discuss the acquisition by Industrial Revenue Bond. This will be on the June 12th agenda. ~-~e6nard L. Kopp / / cc: D. Oas L/-/S-~Z.~ · t~J~SS NIN 'aNFIOIAI · aA'la 3alHS']IM E:/..b""~ 'OD O:):DVSO/~ ^QNV:) 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 7, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-199 SUBJECT: 1979 Improvement Bonds Attached is a proposed resolution for the sale of $3,100,000. of bonds for the 1979 project. This will establish the sale for Wednesday, July 18, 1979; bids to be opened at 2 p.m. and considered by the Council at 7 p.m. Passage of the resolution is recommended. 7 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof,~ a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on Tuesday, the 12th day of June, 1979, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. The following members were present: and the following were absent: Councilman following resolution and moved its adoption: introduced the Resolution No. A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $3,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1979 AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions heretofore adopted by the Council ordering the following described public improvements, contracts have been entered into for construction thereof as authorized by Sec. 429.011 to 429.111, Minnesota Statutes, and said improvements have been completed or are in the process of being completed, and that at least 20% of the costs of such projects have either been assessed or will be assessed against benefited properties, the number of each improvement and the estimated total cost of each improvement being as follows: Improvement Number or Description STREETS AND STORM SEWERS Island Park Area Three Points Area Shirley Hills Area The Highlands Commerce Boulevard-Bartlett Blvd. to Lake Minnetonka Sidewalk Replacement and New Sidewalks Commerce Blvd. and County Road 15 Estimated Project Cost $1,807,760.00 257,240.00 195,880.00 363,440.00 63,148.00 22,300.00 $2,709,768.00 Construction Capitalized Interest Discount Issuance Costs TOTAL BOND ISSUE $2,710,000 343,000 30,000 17,000 $3,100,000 (est. 2 years @ 6%) and WHEREAS, it is necessary that the City borrow the sum of $3,070,000 to finance construction of the aforesaid improvements by the issuance of General Obligation Improvement Bonds as authorized by Chapter 429 and 475 of the Minnesota Statutes, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that it is necessary to sell bonds to provide funds for the purpose of financing the aforedescribed public improvements and that the sum of $3,070,000 is necessary to defray the expenses of said projects. 2. It is further determined that the amount of $3,070,000 should be supplemented by the issuance of additional bonds as authorized by Minnesota Statutes 475.56 and that the City shall sell and issue $3,100,000 of General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1979 with $30,000 of said bonds being considered as additional interest. The sale resolution selling these bonds shall contain a statement indicating the sum considered necessary to finance public improvements, and further indicating that the City is selling additional bonds to represent the higher rate of interest as authorized by Minnesota Statutes and that such additional bonds in the aforementioned amount does not exceed 2% of the amount otherwise authorized. Bids submitted to purchase bonds in the amount of $3,100,000 shall be at a price of not less than $3,070,000 an~ that all amounts received by the Treasurer in excess of said sum shall be credited to a sinking fund for the payment of interest on these obligations. 3. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of said sale to be given by publication at' least 10 days in advance of the sale in the official newspaper and in Commercial West, a financial paper published in Minneapolis, Minnesota, with general circulation throughout the State of Minnesota, which notice shall recite that the City of Mound proposes to issue and sell its bonds in denominations of $5,000 or such higher denominations as requested by the successful bidder within 48 hours after sale of the bonds, and that the bonds shall be numbered consecutively commencing with number 1, shall be dated July 1, 1979, to bear interest on April 1, 1980, and semiannually thereafter on the first day of October and April in each year, maturing serially on April 1 in the years and amounts as follows: YEAR AMOUNT YEAR AMOUNT 1982 $200,000 1990 $200,000 1983 200,000 1991 200,000 1984 200,000 1992 200,000 1985 200,000 1993 200,000 1986 200,000 1994 200,000 1987 200,000 1995 200,000 1988 200,000 1996 300,000 1989 200,000 Bonds maturing after April 1, 1992, will be subject to redemption in inverse numerical order on said date and any interest payment date thereafter at par and accrued interest. Said notice shall recite that the City within 40 days from date of sale will furnish the printed bonds and approving legal opinion of Messrs. LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O'Brien & Drawz 1100 First National Bank Building, Minneapolis, Minnesota, both without cost to purchaser, and that the bonds will be made payable at any suitable bank or trust company designated by the successful bidder, all bids to be accompanied by a good faith check in the amount of at least $62,000 to be forfeited as liquidated damages in the event the bid is accepted by the City and the bidder fails to comply therewith; that no bid of less than $3,070,000 will be accepted; that the Council reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive informalities, and to adjourn the sale if deemed expedient. 4. Sealed bids shall be received until 2:00 p.m. on July 18, 1979, at which time said bids shall be~opened and tabulated by the City Manager and/or City Clerk Treasurer who shall tabulate said bids and present them to the City Council which shall meet at the City Hall in said City on Wednesday, the 18th day of July, 1979, at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of considering said bids for the purchase of said bonds and take such other action in respect thereto as may be found necessary or expedient. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilman , and upo~ vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) I, the undersigned, being the recording .officer of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached minutes of the governing body thereof with the original on file and of record in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript of said minutes insofar as they relate to the issuance and sale of $3,100,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1979. this WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer day of June, 1979. Mary H. Marske City Clerk-Treasurer City of Mound, Minnesota SEAL NOTICE OF BOND SALE $3,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1979 City of Mound, Minnesota Hennepin County NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received by the City of Mound, Minnesota, at the City Hall in said City until 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, July 18, 1979, the City Council of the City will meet at the City Hall in said City on said date at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of considering bids for the purchase of $3,100,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, all bonds dated July 1, 1979, bearing interest payable April 1, 1980, and semi-annually thereafter on October 1 and April 1 and maturing serially on April 1 in the years and amounts as follows: YEAR AMOUNT YEAR AMOUNT 1982 $200,000 1990 $200,000 1983 200,000 1991 200,000 1984 200,000 1992 200,000 1985 200,000 1993 200,000 1986 200,000 1994 200,000 1987 200,000 1995 200,000 1988 200,000 1996 300,000 1989 200,000 Ail bonds maturing after April 1, 1992, shall be subject to redemption in inverse numerical order on said date and any interest payment date thereafter at par and accrued interest. The bonds of the City are to be issued pursuant to Chapter 429 and 475 of the Minnesota Statutes. Bonds will be in the denomination of $5,000 each unless the purchaser within 48 hours after award specifies a higher denomination in multiples of $5,000. The bonds will bear interest at the rate or rates specified by the successful bidder, subject to the limitations stated below. Principal and interest will be made payable at any suitable banking institution designated by the successful bidder subject to the approval of the City and the City will pay reasonable and customary paying agency charges. Within 40 days after award of the sale and without cost to the purchaser, the City will furnish and deliver to the successful bidder anywhere in the Continental United States the printed and executed bonds and the unqualified approving legal opinion of Messrs. LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O'Brien & Drawz of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and the customary final delivery papers, including a certificate showing absence of litigation. Payment must be made in federal or other immediately available funds. Split rate bids may be submitted stating the same rate or rates of interest from date of issue to maturity for all bonds having a common maturity. No basic rate applicable to bonds maturing in any one year may be lower than the basic rate applicable to bonds maturing in any earlier year. Not more than 7 interest rates may be specified for the issue. Each interest rate must be expressed in an integral mutiple of 5/100ths of one percent (1%). No rate may exceed seven percent (7%) per annum on any bond for any portion of its terms. Additional interest coupons may not be used. Bidders are also requested to state total interest cost and average interest rate. Ail bids must be in writing, enclosed in a sealed envelope, be unconditional except as to the above opinion, be addressed to and left with the City Clerk-Treasurer prior to the above time, be for all or none of the $3,100,000 worth of bonds, must be accompanied by a certified check, bank draft or cashier's check in the amount of at least $62,000 payable to the order of the City of Mound to be forfeited as liquidated damages in the event the bid is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith. The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP numbers on the bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such printing to be done at the expense of the purchaser, if the purchaser waives any extension of the time of delivery caused thereby. No bid of less than $3,070,000 plus accrued interest on $3,100,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds at the coupon rates specified to the date of delivery will be considered. Oral bids will not be accepted. The bid offering the lowest total interest cost (total interest from July 1, 1979, to stated maturities, plus any discount belo%; par, less any cash premium offered) will be deemed to be th~ most favorable. The City reserves the right to waive any informality in andy bid, to reject any and all bids and to adjourn the sale. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Mary H. Marske City Clerk-Treasurer' City of Mound DATED: June 12, 1979 NOTICE OF BOND SALE $3,100,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1979 City of Mound, Minnesota Hennepin County The above bonds will be offered for sale on Wednesday, July 18, 1979, sealed bids will be received until 2:00 o'clock p.m. on said date, at which time the bids will be opened and tabulated, the City Council will meet on said date at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall in Mound, Minnesota to consider said bids. The bonds, dated July 1, 1979, will mature on April 1 in the following years and amounts: YEAR AMOUNT YEAR AMOUNT 1982 $200,000 1990 $200,000 1983 200,000 1991 200,000 1984 200,000 1992 200,000 1985 200,000 1993 200,000 1986 200,000 1994 200,000 1987 200,000 1995 200,000 1988 200,000 1996 300,000 1989 200,000 Ail bonds maturing after April 1, 1992, shall be subject to redemption in inverse numerical order on said date and any interest payment date'thereafter at par and accrued interest. Interest will be payable April 1, 1980, and semiannually thereafter on October 1 and April 1 of each year. No bid of less than $3,070,000 plus accrued interest on the $3,100,000 bonds or providing for a total interest cost exceeding 7% will be considered. Approving opinion by Messrs. LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O'Brien & Drawz of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The proceeds of the bonds will be used to finance various local improvements in the City. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Mary H. Marske City Clerk-Treasurer City of Mound, Minnesota DATED: June 12, 1979 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 7~ 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-196 SUBJECT: Swimming Beaches Attached. is an outline of negotiated costs for lifeguards and youth employment service. Please note that the lifeguards will be used at beaches while swimming lessons are being given. This will allow the instruc~ tor to concentrate on teaching and not having to be watching swimmers not in the class. The alternative is to close the beach to swimmers other than those taking lessons. rd L. Kopp cc: Park Commission ! O RICT NO. 277A~/ MOUND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL r', ~,~J 5630 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD /~'// MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 DR. DALE FISHER SUPERINTENDENT 6-4-79 Mr. Len Kopp, Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN 55364 Dear Len: C. R. PETERSON, PRINCIPAL and COORDINATOR EMPLOYEE/STUDENT A~ISTANCE PROGRAM Below is a listing of service charges for life guards, life guard supervision/ training/scheduling, and a youth employment service. The charges stated are for the maximum hours. The City of Mound will receive a refund credit for all service hours not scheduled because of bad weather. Each refund rate will be that of the employee not working. Life Guard Services $3.65 per hour rate Surfside - 12 weeks, 2 guards Mon.-Fri, 3 guards Sat.-Sun. training of 2 hours per week chwood, Penbrook, Three Points, Chester lesson time open beach life guards Supervision/Training/SchedulinE of Life Guards $6.15 per hour rate 4 hours per week; 12 weeks mileage Youth Employment Service The City of Mound will be charged $2.00 per resident youth registering for the youth employment service. (estimate 300) $4,036.90 1,051.20 319.80 50.10 35,458.00 $ 600.00 Total for this letter of services Sincerely, Chuck Peterson, Director of Community Services $6,058.00 MOUND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: TELEPHONE 612-472-5263 /,_~.--~ ~_~ 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 7, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-198 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land - Lots 11 & 12, Block 9, Woodland Point Attached is a copy of a letter from the Attorney for the owner of Lots 13 and 14, Block 10, Woodland Point, asking that the City acquire and resell to him the subject lots. He indicated that he will accept a deed with restrictions against building on the lots. Does the Council wish to release these lots? The attached map showS in green the land owned by the City. cc: Public Works Engineer L. Oberhauser June 1, 1979 GRATHWOL, PLOETZ 8~. OBERHAUSER ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORs AT LAW 14~:~1 E. WAYZATA BOULEVARD-SUITE 210 WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 (612') 47.~-2401 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Bart Haglund Our File 6304-1 Mr. Haglund has been requested to give a temporary and permanent easement over a portion of Lots 13 and 14, Block 10, Woodland Point. Mr. Haglund is agreeable to doing the same, but requests that the City review with him some problems that he would like to have resolved. The first problem is the condition of the adjacent lot to the South of the property owned by,Lt. Haglund. It is Mr. Haglund~s undezstanding that these lots are owned by the City and are being used for a refuge dump. He would greatly appreciate some assurance from the City that these lots will be cleaned up and that ~n the future they will be more strictly control±ed. Jennings Road when it was installed created a situation in which the water flowing towards Lake MSnnetonka came onto the property described as Lots 13 and 14, Block 10, Woodland Point. A 15" C.M.P. is being fnstalled or has been installed for the purpose of assisting the flowage of the water from Mr. Haglund's property into Lake Minnetonka.. It is Mr. Haglund's opinion that during the construction of the street that the grade of his property and the adjacent road could be changed so that the water rather than running onto Mr. Haglund's property and creating a pondl~ng problem on his property, could be directed toward the other sSde of the street and pond on the property owned by the City or be directed so ~t runs directly into the lake without using Mr. Haglund's property as a ponding area, It is also noted, that the City has not obtained from Mr. Haglund any easement which_ would allow water to be ponded on his property to satisfy the drainage needs of the area. Could you please look at this problem and let us-know how it can be taken /.fMC' City of Mound June 1, 1979 Page 2 care of during the course of construction of the street in question. It is noted that Lots 11 and 12 across Dove Avenue from the property owned by Haglund had been mcquired by the City for tax purposes. Would it be possible for Mr. Haglund to acquire the fee title to ~aid property for purposes of having a place to install a dock for lake access. We would agree that any ownership rights that we may acquire to said lot would not entitle us to construct any assessory buildings or permanent structures thereon. With regards to the easement I have inserted the following language: "Grantee by accepting this deed agrees that any property covered by this easement shall be included in determining lot sizes for building purposes and all setbacks shall be from the lot lines and not from the easement lines. Grantee agrees to repair all damages to property and to re-sod the area covered by this easement." Would you please let me know what the City's positions are on the three issues that I brQught up, and as soon as Mr. Haglund has signed the easement I will be in a position to deliver the same to you. Sincerely, [k__~ I S~OBER~A. tlgBR- LBO: ~1 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 7, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-195 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land - Lot 5, Block 28, Wychwood The City needs a temporary easement over the subject State owned lot. A resolution requesting the following easement is requested: A temporary construction easement for street purposes over and across the following described property: Lot 5, Block 28, Wychwood, according to the recorded plat thereof. Said temporary construction easement being the north 5.00 fe~t of said Lot 5. Said temporary construction easement expires August 31, 1980. Leonard L. Kopp 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 8, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-202 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land On June 6th, the Council discussed wiping out lot lines and in effect replatting some of the land. This idea has been discussed with the County Land Department and the City Attorney. The Attorney advises that resubdividing might not accomplish our purpose, but purchasing and reselling the lots with a restriction in the deed would. In discussions with the County, they suggested keeping the middle building site of three building sites off sale until the outer lots are built upon. Putting the two suggestions together, the City could try and resell the middle lots with the restriction and allow the other two to go on sale. This will be discussed on June 12th. Leonard L~ Kopp 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 6, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-192 SUBJECT: Club License Renewal - VFW The Chamberlain-Goudy VFW Post # 5113 has applied for renewal of the Club License. Leo~ard L. Kopp /S ?? 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 6, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-194 SUBJECT: Dock Permits Attached is a list of dock permits which are recommended for approval. ~L. Kopp ~ CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 June 5, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Koop Dock Insoector Dock List #P, Addendum The following people qualify for approval of their dock permit. FEE DOCK # NAME ADDRF~S ABT PAID 51435 Bernloehr, Bruce; 2885 Cambridge yes $27.00 00195 Blood, Michael; 1675 Dove Lane no $27.00 49461 Bolin, Scott; 4747 Island View Dr. yes $25.00 02260 Bondhus, Roger; 1604 Eagle Ln. no $27.00 10370 Broland, Michael; 4961 Three Points no $27.00 13330 Bullock, E. Leo; 1735 Canary Ln. no $25.00 00050 Caddon, Steve; 1672 Avocet Ln. yes $25.00 44193 Carnahan, Alexander; 4945 I. V.D. yes $27.00 20830 Carrow, William; 2187 Cedar Ln. no $27.00 13390 Dolejsi, Allen; 1736 BluebirdLn. yes $27.00 12670 Finkler, Ray; 1700 Finbh Ln. no $~5.00 61070-9 Fish, John: 60~9 Cherrywood Rd. no $P5.00 51705 Flatten, Roberta; 9854 Cambridge no $27.00 02200 Forrest, Norrine; 1624 Finch Ln. no $27.00 12880 FuDlseth, Owen; 1652 Gull Ln. no $27.00 32940 Haley, Richard; 4574 Denbigh Rd. yes $27.00 51885 Heggen, Miriam; 4990 Brighton Blvd. no $25.00 DOCK TYPE PHONE S 920-2905 S 472-3997 S 472-3958 S 472-1755 S 472-4372 S 471-9058 S 472-4246 S 472-6373 S 472 -5355 S 472-5058 S 473-2537 S 472-3861 S 472-4771 S 472-4737 S 472 -4457 S 472-6981 S 935-1135 / 77 SUBJECT: Dock t~st~2, Addeddum ~1 (Continued) Pa~e P DOCK # 41o5o-1 5o415 41377 loo30 31420 31300 50385-2 515~5 30300-2 4318o 125eo 51315 511o5 N~4E ADDRESS ABT Hopper, Robert; 4524 Tuxedo Blvd. no Ingbretson, Nell; 2649 Wilshire no Johnson, Carl; 4633 I. V.D. yes Laurie, Gerald; 6460 Bay Rid~e Rd. no Muellner, C. Dennis; 4435 Lamberton no Neraasen, Ron; 4725 Bedford no Noor, William; 3076 Alexander Ln. no Rice, Norman; 497h Brunswick Rd. no Smith, Gerald; 2531 Avon Dr. no Snyder, Larry; 4829 I. V.D. yes Sparkm~n, Thomas; 1713 Gull Lno no Swanson, S~lly, 9901 C~mbrid§e yes Taube, Cl~rk; 2927 C~mbrid~e yes $9,922.50 FEES $784.50 ,Addendum $10,707.00 TOTAL FEE DOCK PAID TYPE $25.00 s $25.00 s $36.00 L $27.00 s $27.0o S $27.00 S $12.50 S $25.00 s $25.00 s $~7.oo S $~7.00 S $??.oo S S -252.00 Less Refunds $10,~55.00 Net Fee Paid PHONE 472-2267 472-5392 544-6280 472-5935. 472-4100 472-1503 472-1690 472-5462 472-4363 472-6840 472-4062 472-3208 ~33-3199 Respectful ly, Don Rother Dock Inspector DR/jcn 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound ~ Minnesota June 8, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-203 SUBJECT: County Road 15 The following resolution is suggested for County Road 15: RESOLUTION 79- A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO RECONSIDER CSAH 15 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, Hennepin County did propose to widen CSAH 15 from Navarre to Mound prior to 1974 and subsequently removed this project from their capital improvement plan upon the objection of another municipality, and WHEREAS, the County did in 1978 install a center median in Spring Park as a temporary measure which has improved the traffic flow, but is quickly becoming inadequate in view of the increased traffic, which Hennepin County 1978 figures show to be 17,500 vehicles per day, and WHEREAS, increased summer traffic at the Spring Park boat launching ramp creates hardships for all who travel this roadway, and WHEREAS, when the proposed "ring route" to State Highway 12 is implemented traffic on CSAH 15 will not be reduced but will increase due to the westerly routing to reach the"ring route", and WHEREAS, traffic at County Road 15 and Wilshire Boulevard increased .turning and egress to County Road 15 difficulties, and WHEREAS, the heavier commercial use of County Road 15 within Moun~ creates greater problems between Cypress Lane and the T intersection at Commerce Boulevard, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND: That the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and the Highway De- partment reconsider placement of this project and the County Road 15 By Pass within Mound on their FiVe Year Capital Improvement Program to install a modern four lane commercial type street with curb, gutter, storm sewer, sidewalks and adequate pedestrian crosswalks in the area from CSAH 19 to CSAH 110. '---Jt3eo~ard L. Kopp 6-12-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 6, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-64 SUBJECT: Dock Refunds Attached is a list of refunds from dock permit applications which need Council approval. These will be listed with the payment of bills, June 5, 1979 CITY of MOUND 5.341 MAYVVOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 {612) 472-1155 TO: · FROi~!: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp Dock Inspector Dock Application Refunds The following applicants qualify for refunds on dock permit fees for reason given. Heyman, Tim; 2308 Driftwodd Hanson, Charles; 2332 Driftwood Goman, David; 2440 Chateau Ln. Senneka, Herman; 5860'Lynwood Blvd; Bergs' Roy; Award Realty 12702 Wayzata Blvd. Mike., Mn. 55343 Fish, John; 6049 Cherrywood Rd. Maltz, Maynard; 6037 Ha%~horne Kolar, Robert; 3223 Gladstone Ingbretson, Neill; 2649 Wilshire Smith, Gerald; 2531 Avon Dr. Seagard, Joba; 2531Lakewood Hopper, Robert; 4524 Tuxedo Blvd. Mugson, Don; 4717 Island View Nelson, Jeff; 5043 Enchanted Gardner, John; 1583 Gull Respectfully, Don Rother Dock Ins~ec%or DR/jcn $27.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $~5.oo o~ns lakeshore owns lakeshore cancelled out 'cancelled out cancelled out $12.5o $12.5o $12.5o $1~.5o $12.5o $12.5o $12.5o $12.5o $12.5o $12.5o ~2~2.oo Sharin9 Sharing Sharing Sharing Sharing Sharing Sharing Sharin9 Sharin9 Sharin9 /~7J CITY of MOUND June 8, 1979 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: Subject The Planning Commission The City Manager Survey Attached is a list of the comments received on the survey recently sent out to Mound residents and tabulated by the Planner. Leonard L. Kopp cc: City Council J McCOMBS-KNUTSOASSOCIATES, INC. Reply To: 12805 Olson Memorial Highway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 June 8, 1979 Leonard Kopp City of }lound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota Subject: Mound, Minnesota 1978 Street Improvements & Storm Sewer Dear Mr. Kopp: We are enclosing Thomas & Son's Payment Request No. 8 for work completed through May 30, 1979 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $50,729.57. We have reviewed this request and find that it is in order and recommend payment in the above amount to the contractor. If you have any questions, please contact us. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. LS:jl Enclosure 3880 Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls printe;I on recycl-g,'~ oapar Reply To: 12805 Olson Memorial Highway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 (612) 659-3700 June 8, 1979 Leonard Kopp City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota Subject: Mound, Minnesota 1978 Street Improvements Project No. 145-101-04 Dear Mr. Kopp: We are enclosing Buffalo Bituminous, Inc. Payment Request No. 5 for work completed through May 31, 1979 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $52,231.86. We have reviewed this request and find that it is in order and recommend payment in the above amount to the contractor. If you have any questions, please contact us. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, ?oE. LS:jl Enclosure 3880 Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls printed on recycled paper McCOMB$-KNUT$0N ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS [] LAND SURVEYORS [] SITE PLANNERS June 8, 1979 Eugene Garvais Fire Chief City of Mou~nd 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN $ 5364 City of Mound 1979 Street Construction Dear Chief Garvais: Leonard Kopp, City Manager has asked me to advise you that construction on ~he 1979 Street Project will begin June 11 in the Highlands area. Please take ~his into consideration in ~e event that any emergency vehicles will be traveling these streets. You may need to plan alternate routes. If you have any questions, please call. Thank you. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-/v~NUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. FM: sj ,,~ ~.~213 ~.~c: Leonard Kopp cc: Hardrives, Inc. Fred ~ialue9 12805 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-3700 22 NORTH MAIN STREET, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE (612) 879-8029 SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING DIVISION, MARSHALL, MINNESOTA 56258 TELEPHONE (507) 532-5820 printed on i'ec'~,c!ed paper UM cCOMB$ KNUTSON ASSOCIATE I Cnarle~ Jo~ason Police Chief City of ~,io~d Subject~ Dear Chief Johnson; Leonard Ko:?~p, CiUy ~:-fanag'~r na.~ ask~d me to advis.~.i~ you that co[~r~ction on the i~}79 streat l~roject %.~ii1 begin June 11 i:~ ti'~e Hig'~la~6~ area. P!~,a~';e tak~ this in%o consigeration i~ the event If you hav~ any que.~tions, please call. Wnank you. Ver~' truly c213 : Leonard Kopp cc: Hardrives, Inc. 12805 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-3700 22 NORTH MAIN STREET, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE (612) 879-8029 SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING DIVISION, MARSHALL, MINNESOTA 56258 TELEPHONE (507) 532-5820 printed on recycled paper P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS; David H. Cochran, Pres. ,, H. Dale Palmatier · Albert l. Lehman · James S. Russell · Jean Williams LAKE MIHNETOHKA June 4, 1979 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF BOARD OF MANAGERS Thursday, June 14, 19 79 5:00 P.M. Wayzata City Hall The purpose of the special meeting is to discuss the final engineering report of the district engineer relating to the Minnehaha Creek Improvement Project. NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING OF BOARD OF MANAGERS Thursday, June 28, 1979 (Please note changed regular meeting date.) 7:30 P.M. Wayzata City Hall June ~, 1979 ATTORNEy AT I_AW 1503 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55454 612/333-541 [~ Janice Holm 5016 Edge~ater Drive Mound, MN 5536~ ret Proper~y taken p~rsuant to search ~rrant Dear Ms. Holm: I have talked with two officers of the Mound Police Department in regards to your request that the property taken pursuant to the search ~z-z~nt be returned to you. I have also had conversations with the chief property officer of the Minneapolis Police Department, and a Minneapolis City Attorney. Beyond this, I have performed some research in or~er to determine whether or not your request is reasonable an~ justified by existing law. As I informed you on the phone, I have never been faced with a request such as yours before, and I ~nted to be thoroughly informed before I reached a determination. The results of my efforts are as followsl 1. Any proper~y with altered serial or inlentification numbers may be reasonably considered to be contraband. It is my understanding, that the pioneer stereo receiver has altered serial numbers. If this is true, the Mound Police Department can reasonably retain this item in hopes of finding the rightful owner. After the expiration of a reasonable remount of time (usually considered to be one year), the property can be sold at a public auction. 2. The police may reasonably retain the two car speakers belonging to your son, since it is my understanding that your son f n~ormed the police that the property was stolen before he acquired these items. 3. The shot gun and rifle should be returned to the registered owner, I'm assuming that your ex-husban~ is the registered owner of the guns. It is my understanding that the Mound Police Department has offered to return the guns to him. I'm sure the police would return the guns to your possession if your ex-husband would authorize the police to do so. 4. The hedgetrimmer may be reasonably retained by the Mound Police since the previous owner of it has informed the police that it ~as stolen at the time he acquired it. 5. Wayne Holm plead guilty to receiving the following propezty~ 2 Audio Vox speakers, 2 Realistic spikers, misc. tools and bike paZtSo The Petition stat~i theft the aggregate v~lue of these items were more than $100.00. However, the charge ms reduced to ~eceivtng stolen prop~r~y value~ at under a $100.00. Only the v~lue of the property ms reduced, the stolen items remained as worded in the Petition. Naturally, these items c~nnot be returned to you or you~ son. I believe I have add~ressed myself to all the property you ~nted returned to yo,~ possession (see your letter d~ted M~rch 25, 19~9, to the Mound City Council). In conclusion, I believe the Mound Police Deparbment is acting reasonably. Very truly yours. ' . r/...~.) ~, TLP/ef cc$ Mound Police Department as to any property I omitted, I believe it is reasonable of the police department to request that you provide a receipt of purchase or some verification of purchase from the retailer before the property can be returned to you. SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT 6 Courthous~ Minneapolis, Minnesota 554i 5 Don Omodt, Sheriff June 4, 1979 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager, City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Kopp: This letter is a follow up of our telephone conversation in regards to the owner of Lot 2 on Seton Channel setting up a con- cession stand. As I stated in our telephone conversation, the Water Patrol is very concerned about the navigation problems which will be caused by boats stopping at Mr. Schnebly's stand. This Channel is one of the busiest channels on Lake Mlnnetonka and there is already a navigation problem in this Channel because of the excessive boat traffic. This will be compounded because of bo~ts blocking each other while trying to cut across the Channel to tie up at the concession stand. I feel that a concession stand on one of the busiest channels in the Lake wil. 1 create traffic and navigation problems which the Water Patrol is neither staffed nor equipped to handle. Sincerely yours, DON OMODT, SHERIFF Sergeant LP/AM :ab HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer / .s.s'-,F DEPARTMENT BUDGETED'"' CURRENT EXP. Y-T-D E"~I'TP. .41 ALLO~/ED AC'iUAL 02011 COUNCIL $ 10,450.00 852.39 3,488.74 4,354.52 .3339 03012 ttUMAN RIGHTS 360.00 -- 194.41 150.O1 .5400. 04013 ~NAGER 85,180-OO 5,937.21 42,946.62 35,494.51 .5042 06014 ELECTIONS 1,080.00 7.86 450.04 .0073 07015 ASSESSING 33,055.00 1OO.OO 489.74 13,774.O2 .O148 09016 FINANCE 98,640.00 9,643.37 41,282.66 41,103.29 .4185 11018 LEGAL 12,8OO.OO 1,O66.67 5,333.35 5,333.76 .4167 11118 PROSECUTING 11',O55,00 ..... 5,999.18 4,606.62 .5427 14031 POLICE 457,211.00 35,946.25 183,982.26 190,519.82 .4024 17032. FIRE 94,375.00 6,544.76 27,773.43 39,326.06 .2943 19033'INSPECTIONS 26,960,OO 3,795.33 12,O31.74 11,234.23 .4463 19933 PLANNING 20,550.00 2,028.67 9,759.08 8,563.19 .47~9 21034 CIVIL DEFENSE '15~140.00 110.40 1,810.85 6,308.84 .1196 '28042 STREET 227,955.00 28,614.78 118,221.36 94,988.85 .5186. .29743 SHOP & STORE 35,485,OO 3.377.73 12,512.86 14,786.60 ".3526 !35847 ~iSEASED TREiES 22,440,00' 1,206.O9 ' 2,374.62 9,350.75 .iO58 i34069'PARKS 63,936.00 6,617.71 ' 24,981.01 26,'64~.'13 .3907 i41081C.E.T.A. .. 891'.67 5,906.95 100082 T~MPORAR~ LABOR 11,050.00 333.15 1 555 30 4,604.54' ' 14OB' i65091 LIQUOR -165,905,OO 13,767.51 63,4'25.52 69,132~61 .382} !60078 SEWER 379,676,00 26,937.19 117','108.'84' 158,210.99 ..... 3084' 60173 wA~ER 2~6,191.OO 21,340.O8 77,550.00 94,253.79 .3429 115 REVENUE SHARING , . i ' 42,314.00 2 620.05 5,591 68 17,632..24 .1321 [28 IMP EQUIP OUTLAY 108,941 OO 4,448 33 28,119.59 45,395.71 2581 80 CEMETERY 5,335.00 50.00 290.00 2,223.O9 .0544 182 RETIREMENT 83,O16,OO 10,963.94 30,439.16 34,592.77 3667 I ' 95 FIRE RELIEF 40,750,00. 1,560.15 16,980.53 .0383 ~25 WATER REVENUE 54,612,00' . ..... !87,5Q. '.'.'~'.'~2,756.82 ..0034 ,,, ·. 83 CONTINGENCY.. _ 20,000-00 ....... . .... 8, .00 ............ TOTALS ~,354,{~62~O0 187,193.28 827,924.46 981,104.32 .351~_~ WESTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS MOUND, MINNESOTA June 5, 1979 TO: The school district's annual Community Services Conference is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. in the faculty dining room of the Mound Westonka High School. A regular school board meeting follows at 8:00 p.m. This conference is required by law if the school district'~ is to be authorized to levy and spend funds for community services. We have already met a substantial portion of the law by our recent invitation of some 100 persons to the June 11 Conference. Such persons are all the members of the Community Services Council, the three City Councils within the school district, the Hennepin County Commissioners, 277 School Board, and the three local legislators. This year, we expect the Conference to be chaired by Phyllis O'Malley, Clerk of the School Board. We expect Don Ulrick, Community Services Coordinator, to present some information on the current state of coordination of services in our Westonka community. Following that presentation, we expect to engage in a general discussion. By this letter, I am re-issuing an invitation to ke.y people whose presence is very important to the Community Services Conference. I hope you will be there. Sincerely, Dale E. Fisher SUPERINTENDENT