2017-09-12 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 - 7:00 PM
REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
*ConsentAQenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call
vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
Opening meeting
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approve agenda, with any amendments
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature, have been evaluated by staff,
recommended by staff for approval by the Council, and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. At this time, anyone present who
wishes to offer dissenting comment to any items on the Consent Agenda is invited to identify themselves and the item of
concern so that the it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered after discussion in normal sequence.
Separate introduction or further support from petitioners or requestors is not required at this time and removal of an item
from the Consent Agenda for this purpose is not required or appropriate.
4. *Consent Agenda
Page
*A.
Approve payment of claims
2468-2507
*B.
Approve Minutes: 8-22-17 Regular Meeting
2508-2514
*C.
Approve Resolution Authorizing the Adoption of the City of Mound
2515-2517
Safety Program and Policy Statement
2516
*D.
Approve Resolution Authorizing the Adoption of the 2015 Minnesota
2518-2525
State Fire Code, including appendix Chapter D
2521
*E.
Approve Resolution approving detached accessory structure/garage
2526-2540
with apartment project at 6199 Sinclair Road, PID No. 23-117-24-34-0072
2529
*F. Approve Pay Request No. 5 from Park Construction in the amount of 2541-2542
$517,803.97 for the 2017 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall
Improvement Project; City Project Nos. PW -17-01, PW -17-02,
PW -17-03, PW -17-04
*G. Approve Pay Request No. 1 from Widmer Construction in the Amount 2543-2544
of $188,152.33 for the 2017 Lift Station Improvement Project,
City Project No. PW 17-05
*H
*I.
*J.
*K.
*L.
*M
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
Approve the following resolutions related to teh 2017 Manhole Rehabilitation 2545-2547
Project:
a. Approve Resolution Awarding Contract for 2017 Manhole 2546
Rehabilitation Project, City project No. PW 17-06
b. Approve Resolution Approving Application for MCES Grant Funding 2547
for 2017 Manhole Rehabilitation Project, City Project No. 17-06
Approve Pay Request No. 1 from Allied Blacktop Company in the Amount 2548-2549
of $35,394.84 for the 2017 Seal Coat Project, City Project No. PW 17-07
Approve the following project related pay requests: 2550-2558
a. Braun Intertec, totaling $ 10,946.00 for the 2016 Street
Improvement Project and $3,384.21 for the 2017 Street
Improvement Project
Approve Resolution approving proposal to amend City of Mound 2559-2614
Wellhead Protection Plan 2560
Approve resolutions declaring final costs and setting hearings for
2016 City Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Projects:
a. Resolution declaring cost to be assessed, and ordering preparation of 2615
proposed assessment on 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall
Improvement Project - Tuxedo Boulevard Phase II PW -16-02
b. Resolution declaring cost to be assessed, and ordering preparation of 2616
proposed assessment on 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall
Improvement Project - Cypress Lane/Maywood Road PW -16-03
c. Resolution declaring cost to be assessed, and ordering preparation of 2617
proposed assessment on 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall
Improvement Project -Bartlett Boulevard PW -16-01
d. Resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for 2016 Street, Utility 2618
and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Tuxedo Boulevard Phase II
PW -16-02
e. Resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for 2016 Street, Utility 2619
and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Cypress Lane/Maywood Road
PW -16-03
f. Resolution for hearing on proposed assessment for 2016 Street, Utility 2620
and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Bartlett Boulevard PW -16-01
Approve Resolution approving Expansion Permit for 2072 Shorewood Lane, 2621-2645
Plamling Case No. 17-31, PID No. 18-117-23-31-0006 2622
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
*N. Approve Resolution Approving Construction Cooperative Agreement 2646-2659
for replacement of Commerce Boulevard (County Highway 110) retaining 2647
wall, from Balsam Road to Grandview Boulevard
5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda.
(Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.)
6. Action closing the meeting under Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.03, to consider
strategies related to labor negotiations under the Public Employment Labor
Relations Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 179A
7. Information/Miscellaneous
A. Comments/Reports from Council members
B. Reports: Mound Fire Department - August 2017 2660-2662
C. Minutes: Planning Comm 8-15-17 2663-2669
D. Correspondence: MN DNR FYI Snowmobile GIA Program Update 2670-2671
Madden, Galanter, Hansen LLP Hourly Rate Increase 2672
Mediacom - Changes to HD Channel Lineup 2673
8. Adjourn
• J• WiMINQM.
Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!!
16 September - Mound -Tree Trust Tree Sale Tree Pick-up Day City Snow Barn Lot on Lynwood
26 September - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required)
26 September - 2017 - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting
10 October - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required)
10 October - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting
Tentative Maywood/Wilshire and Tuxedo Ph II Final Assessment Hearing
17 October - 6:30 PM - Council Special Meeting Workshop - 2018 Budget
24 October - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required)
24 October - 2017 - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting
Tentative Bartlett Final Assessment Hearing
Comp Plan Update Draft review
14 November- 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required)
14 November- 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting
28 November- 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required)
28 November- 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting
12 December- 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required)
12 December- 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting
City Offices Closed
City Offices resume Winter Hours Wednesday, November 1; 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM
23 and 24 November in observance of Thanksgiving
City Official's Absences
Please notify the City Manager in advance of an absence. Some votes require more than a simple
majority and Staff needs to plan accordingly.
Inquire in advance, please......
Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more
research may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision-
making.
City of Mound Claims 9-12-17
YEAR BATCH 1 DOLLAR
2017
• •,
090117CTYMAN
$
23,380.17
2017
2017SOTL
$
2,828.76
2017
0617KENGRAVE
$
9.96
2017
0717KENGRAV
$
4,201.82
2017
0717BOLTMENK
$
.1
2017
0717HOISINGT
$
6,702.97
2017
RYANCONT#8
$
194;771.65
2017
PARKCONST#4
$
260,233.31
2017
091217CITY
$
194,711.72
1 0 •
City of Mound Claims 9-12-17 1
2017
091217CITY2
$
13,777.64
2017
091217CITY3
$
605.82
2017
091217CITY4
$
543.07
2017
091217HWS
$
122,870.69
TOTAL CLAIMS' 967,427.76
CITY OF MOUND 09/01/17 9:43 AM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Batch Name 090117CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $23,380.17
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $23,380.17
Refer
Cash Payment
$0.00 In Balance
5 AICPA-AMER /NST CERT PUB ACC
E 101-41500-433 Dues and Subscriptions MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL C. PAUSCHE AUG
2017 THRU JULY 2018
$265.00
Invoice 090117
9/1/2017
Transaction Date 9/1/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$265.00
Refer
1 AMERICAN WATERWORKS ASSO
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training
ANNUAL CONFERENCE REG- AMERICAN
$35.00
WATERWORKS ASSOC- DULUTH 9-12 THRU
9-15-17- R. PRICH- ADDTL FEE
Invoice 082217-2 8/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training
ANNUAL CONFERENCE REG -AMERICAN
$35.00
WATERWORKS ASSOC- DULUTH 9-12 THRU
9-15-17- B. KRESS- ADDTL FEE
Invoice 082217-2 8/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training
ANNUAL CONFERENCE REG- AMERICAN
$35.00
WATERWORKS ASSOC- DULUTH 9-12 THRU
9-15-17- R. HANSON- ADDTL FEE
Invoice 082217-2 8/8/2017
Transaction Date 9/1/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$105.00
Refer
9 BROOKS PROPERTIES, LLC
Cash Payment
G 101-23405 5040 ENCHANTED LN UTILI REFUND -RELEASE OF UTILITIES ESCROW-
$7,362.50
5040 ENCHANTED RD- BROOKS
PROPERTIES, LLC
Invoice 090117
8/24/2017
Transaction Date
9/1/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$7,362.50
Refer
6 KELLY, KEVIN
Cash Payment
E 281-45210-331 Use of personal auto
REIMB MILEAGE- DOCK INSPECTIONS- 7-27-
$37.13
17 THRU 8-18-17 K. KELLY
Invoice 090117
8/23/2017
Transaction Date
9/1/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$37.13
Refer
3 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
Cash Payment
E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions
MN MAYORS ASSOC MEMBERSHIP DUES,
$30.00
M. WEGSCHEID- SEPT 2017 THRU AUG 2018
Invoice 090117
9/1/2017
Transaction Date
9/1/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$30.00
Refer
4 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
Cash Payment
E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions
SEPT 2017 THRU AUG 2018 MEMBERSHIP
$9,101.00
DUES BASED ON CITY POPULATION 9,371
Invoice 257970
9/1/2017
Transaction Date
9/1/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$9,101.00
Refer
8 MEISEL, PAT
Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic
2016-2017 LANGDON CBD PARKING NET
$1,603.76
REFUND- P. MEISEL- MEISEL PROPERTIES
Invoice 090117
8/23/2017
Transaction Date
9/1/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,603.76
Refer
11 MIDWEST SERVICES
- -2470-
CITY OF MOUND 09/01/17 9:43 AM
Page 2
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic
MECHANIC SVCS- JULY 2017- #304 TYMCO
$637.50
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale REPAY WINE CREDIT TAKEN TWICE
$43.48
SWEEPER, WELL #8 GENERATOR, TRUCK
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale REPAY WINE CREDIT TAKEN TWICE
$176.50
#105, TRUCK #209
Invoice 1562
8/7/2017
Project 17-5
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic
MECHANIC SVCS- JULY 2017- TRUCKS #209,
$680.00
Invoice 9790975659 8/13/2017
#214, #210
$116.63
Invoice 1562
8/7/2017
Project 17-5
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic
MECHANIC SVCS- JULY 2017- TRUCKS #109,
$680.00
Invoice 9790975659 8/13/2017
#112
$38.40
Invoice 1562
8/7/2017
Project 17-5
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic
MECHANIC SVCS- JULY 2017- TRUCKS #109,
$680.00
Invoice 9790975659 8/13/2017
#407
$57.11
Invoice 1562
8/7/2017
Project 17-5
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic
MECHANIC SVCS- JULY 2017- TRUCKS #109,
$637.50
#512, #316- PARKS UTILITY TRAILER
Invoice 1562
8/7/2017
Project 17-5
Transaction Date
8/30/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,315.00
Refer
7 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERA
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-433 Dues and Subscriptions
REGISTRATION FEE REGIONAL MTG -
$15.00
SEPT 20TH 2017 ROSEVILLE - J. COLOTTI
Invoice 090117 9/1/2017
Transaction Date 9/1/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$15.00
Refer 2 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale REPAY WINE CREDIT TAKEN TWICE
$43.48
Invoice 8592154CMCX 6/2/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale REPAY WINE CREDIT TAKEN TWICE
$176.50
Invoice 8590446CMCX 5/17/2017
Transaction Date 9/1/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$219.98
Refer 12 VERIZON WIRELESS
Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-17 THRU 8-13-
$147.90
2017
Invoice 9790975659 8/13/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-17 THRU 8-13-
$116.63
2017
Invoice 9790975659 8/13/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-17 THRU 8-13-
$89.57
2017
Invoice 9790975659 8/13/2017
Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-17 THRU 8-13-
$38.40
2017
Invoice 9790975659 8/13/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-17 THRU 8-13-
$93.87
2017
Invoice 9790975659 8/13/2017
Cash Payment E 10141310-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-17 THRU 8-13-
$57.11
2017
Invoice 9790975659 8/13/2017
Cash Payment E 22242260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-17 THRU 8-13-
$101.48
2017
Invoice 9790975659 8/13/2017
-2471-
D i M 9 W, J[iIlk,I
Current Period: September 2017
09/01/17 9:43 AM
Page 3
Cash Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-17 THRU 8-13-
$15.65
2017
Invoice 9790975659 8/13/2017
Transaction Date 8/31/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$660.61
10 VER/ZON WIRELESS
_Refer
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE LADDER TRUCK #44
$35.01
7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi SEWER TRUCK #109 DATACARD SVC 7-11-
$35.01
17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS SUPV VEHC #113 R. HANSON
$35.01
DATACARD SVC 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017 Project 17-3
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS JET PACK LAPTOP AIRCARD SVC
$35.01
7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017 Project 17-3
Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 7-11-17 TO
$17.51
8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 7-11-17 TO
$17.50
8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #42 DUTY
$35.01
OFFICER 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #39 FIRE CHIEF
$35.01
RESCUE UTILITY 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE #43 RESCUE TRUCK
$35.01
7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE #29 7-11-17
$35.01
TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #315 DATACARD SVC 7-11-
$35.01
17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #512 R. PRICH DATACARD
$35.01
SVC 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET
$17.51
SVC 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET
$17.50
SVC 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 10145200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT
$35.01
SPOT- 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT
$35.01
SPOT 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
-2472-
• • s
Current Period: September 2017
09/01/17 9:43 AM
Page 4
Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, &Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET-
$35.01
INTERNET SVC- 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- RAY HANSON -
$35.01
TABLET- INTERNET SVC- 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017 Project 17-5
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- RAY HANSON -
$35.01
TABLET- HOT SPOT 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017 Project 17-5
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT
$17.50
SPOT- 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT
$17.51
SPOT- 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET
$35.01
SVC 7-11-17 TO 8-10-17
Invoice 9790753833 8/10/2017
Transaction Date 9/1/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$665.19
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND $18,890.24
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $276.53
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $37.13
601 WATER FUND $326.66
602 SEWER FUND $3,614.63
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $234.98
$23,380.17
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $23,380.17
Total $23,380.17
-2473-
CITY OF i t;
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Batch Name 2017SOTL User Dollar Amt $2,828.76
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $2,828.76
Refer 1 SPIRIT OF THE LAKES FESTIVAL
Cash Payment R 609-49750-37814 Taxable Mix & Misc.
Invoice 3124 7/25/2017
Cash Payment R 609-49750-37814 Taxable Mix & Misc.
Invoice 3124 7/25/2017
Cash Payment R 609-49750-37814 Taxable Mix & Misc.
Invoice 3124
7/25/2017
Cash Payment
G 101-22802 Festival
Invoice 145456
7/17/2017
Cash Payment
G 101-22802 Festival
Invoice 145457
7/17/2017
Cash Payment
G 101-22802 Festival
Invoice 052417
5/24/2017
Cash Payment
G 101-22802 Festival
Invoice 073117
7/31/2017
Cash Payment
G 101-22802 Festival
Invoice 3124 7/25/2017
Cash Payment G 101-22802 Festival
$0.00 In Balance
09/05/17 11:30 AM
Page 1
SOTL GROSS REVENUE FOR TASTING $6,389.00
EVENT TICKETS & WRISTBANDS SOLD @
HWS
SOTL- PRODUCT TASTING& HWS $43.00
SPONSORED
SOTL - LIQUOR PRODUCTS PURCHASED -$2,654.44
FROM HWS SOLD AT EVENT BEER TENTS
TRUE VALUE FEED SCOOP -$8.98
TRUE VALUE- CLOTHESLINE -$17.98
SOTL POSTAGE- 104 PIECES MAILED TO -$47.84
PARADE ROUTE NEIGHBORS & CHAPMAN
PLACE 5-24-17
SOTL - COPIES MADE AT CITY HALL -$30.00
SOTL - SPIEGELAU FESTIVAL BORDEAUX -$594.00
TASTING GLASSES - PURCHASED FROM
WINE MERCHANTS
SOTL- FIREWORKS INSURANCE- LEAGUE -$250.00
OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST
Invoice 072217 7/22/2017
Transaction Date 7/27/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,828.76
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND ($948.80)
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $3,777.56
$2,828.76
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $2,828.76
Total $2,828.76
09/06/17 3:34 PM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Batch Name
0617KENGRAVE User Dollar Amt $3,009.96
Payments Computer Dollar
Amt $3,009.96
$0.00 In Balance
Refer
6 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN
Cash Payment
E 101-41600-316 Legal P & I
PLANNING LEGAL SVCS JUNE 2017
$117.50
Invoice 138513
7/31/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41600-316 Legal P & I
COMP PLAN- P & I DEPT LEGAL SVCS JUNE
$22.50
2017
Invoice 138513
7/31/2017
Cash Payment
G 101-23360 SERENITY HILLS
SERENITY HILLS DEVELOPMENT- PLAT
$817.50
LEGAL SVCS JUNE 2017
Invoice 138513
7/31/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA
2017 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 17-05
$72.50
LEGAL SVCS JUNE 2017
Invoice 138513
7/31/2017
Project PW1705
Cash Payment
G 101-23349 1861 COMMERCE -TRIDENT DUTCH LAKE PRESERVE -1861 COMMERCE
$1,466.96
BLVD LEGAL SVCS JUNE 2017
Invoice 138513
7/31/2017
Cash Payment
G 101-23410 PC 17-19 5459 BARTLETt'
6251 WESTEDGE BLVE- T. STOKES MINOR
$29.00
SUBDV LEGAL SVCS JUNE 2017
Invoice 138513
7/31/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-49999-430 Miscellaneous
4837 BEDFORD HAZARDOUS BLDG-
$414.00
ABATEMENT LEGAL SVCS JUNE 2017
Invoice 138513
7/31/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-49999-430 Miscellaneous
6077 ASPEN RD HAZARDOUS BLDG-
$70.00
ABATEMENT LEGAL SVCS JUNE 2017
Invoice 138513
7/31/2017
Transaction Date
9/6/2017 Due 12/31/2015
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,009.96
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$2,937.46
602 SEWER FUND
$72.50
$3,009.96
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,009.96
Total $3,009.96
-2475-
1
Current Period: September 2017
Batch Name 0717KENGRAV User Dollar Amt $4,201.82
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $4,201.82
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 7 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN
Cash Payment E 101-41600-316 Legal P & I
Invoice 138918 8/31/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23360 SERENITY HILLS
Invoice 138918 8/31/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA
5862 BARTLETT BLVD -PLANNING LEGAL
SVCS JULY 2017
SERENITY HILLS DEVELOPMENT- PLAT
LEGAL SVCS JULY 2017
2017 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 17-05
LEGAL SVCS JULY 2017
Invoice 138918 8/31/2017 Project PW1705
Cash Payment G 101-23349 1861 COMMERCE -TRIDENT DUTCH LAKE PRESERVE -1861 COMMERCE
BLVD LEGAL SVCS JULY 2017
Invoice 138918 8/31/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23380 PC 17-21-17-22 2060 WATE 2060 WATERSIDE LN- VAR APP REVIEW -
LEGAL SVCS JULY 2017
Invoice 138918 8/31/2017
Cash Payment E 101-49999-430 Miscellaneous
Invoice 138918 8/31/2017
Cash Payment E 101-49999-430 Miscellaneous
Invoice 138918 8/31/2017
Cash Payment E 401-43118-304 Legal Fees
4837 BEDFORD HAZARDOUS BLDG -
ABATEMENT LEGAL SVCS JULY 2017
6077 ASPEN RD HAZARDOUS BLDG -
ABATEMENT LEGAL SVCS JULY 2017
2018 STREET IMPROV PROJ PW 18-01
LEGAL SVCS JULY 2017
09/06/17 4:09 PM
Page 1
$737.00
$239.50
$602.32
$275.50
$29.00
$1,749.00
$192.50
$348.00
Invoice 138918 8/31/2017
Cash Payment G 101-233814873 SHORELINE PC 17-23 4873 SHORELINE DR -VAR APP REVIEW- $29.00
LEGAL SVCS JULY 2017
Invoice 138918 8/31/2017
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Due 12/31/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,201.82
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND $3,251.50
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $348.00
602 SEWER FUND $602.32
$4,201.82
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $4,201.82
Total $4,201.82
-2476-
CITY OF MOUND 09/06/17 11:18 AM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Batch Name 0717BOLTMENK User Dollar Amt $139,790.18
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $139,790.18
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA
Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS 6-17-17 $300.00
THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206662 7/31/2017
Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs STORMWATER UTILITY -SWPPP UPDATE $153.00
ENG SVCS 6-17-17 THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206663 7/31/2017
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $453.00
Refer 2 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA
Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs WATER WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN $1,626.00
ENGINEERING SVCS 6-17-17 THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206669
7/31/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0206655
7/31/2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0206655
7/31/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0206655
7/31/2017
Cash Payment
E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs
GIS UPDATES ENG SVC 6-17-17 THRU 7-14- $606.00
17
GIS UPDATES ENG SVC 6-17-17 THRU 7-14- $606.00
17
GIS UPDATES ENG SVC 6-17-17 THRU 7-14- $606.00
17
GIS UPDATES ENG SVC 6-17-17 THRU 7-14- $606.00
17
Invoice 0206655
7/31/2017
Transaction Date
9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$4,050.00
Refer
3 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA
_
Cash Payment
E 401-43115-303 Engineering Fees
2015 GRANDVIEW BLVD ST IMPROV PROD
$132.50
ENG SVC 6-17-17 THRU 7-14-17 PW 15-01
Invoice 0206656
7/31/2017
Project PW1501
Cash Payment
E 401-43135-303 Engineering Fees
2015 TUXEDO BLVD ST IMPROV PROJ ENG
$1,006.50
SVC 6-17-17 THRU 7-14-17 PW 15-02
Invoice 0206665
7/31/2017
Project PW1502
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay FA
WATERMAIN LOOP BARTLETT TO ISLAND
$1,100.00
PARK PROJ 15-10 ENG SVCS 6-17-17 THRU
7-14-17
Invoice 0206668 7/31/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay FA
Project PW1510
2015 WILSHIRE BLVD TRUNK WATERMAIN $4,331.50
IMPROV PROD PW 15-11 ENG SVC 6-17-17
THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206671 7/31/2017 Project PW1511
Cash Payment G 101-23327 MCESL39 BRADFORDMIL MCES LS #39 & INTERCEPT REPLACEMENT $486.00
PROD -ENGINEERING SVCS 6-17-17 THRU 7-
14-17
Invoice 0206659 7/31/2017
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,056.50
Refer 4 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA
Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA 2016 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROD PW 16-05 $4,030.00
ENG S\lr. a-17-17 THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206632 7/31/2017 -2477- Project PW1605
CITY OF MOUND 09/06/17 11:18 AM
Page 2
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Cash Payment E 401-43146-303 Engineering Fees
Invoice 0206640 7/31/2017
Cash Payment E 401-43116-303 Engineering Fees
Invoice 0206637 7/31/2017
Cash Payment E 401-43136-303 Engineering Fees
2016 CYPRESS-MAYWOOD STREET $5,042.00
IMPROV PROJ PW 16-03 ENG SVC 6-17-17
THRU 7-14-17
Project PW1603
2016 BARTLETT BLVD STREET IMPROV $12,877.50
PROJ PW 16-01 ENG SVC 6-17-17 THRU 7-
14-17
Project PW1601
2016 TUXEDO BLVD EAST STREET IMPROV $8,722.50
PROD PW 16-02 ENG SVC 6-17-17 THRU 7-
14-17
Invoice 0206666 7/31/2017
Project PW1602
Cash Payment
E 675-49425-500 Capital Outlay FA
2016 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROV PROD- PW
$2,814.00
16-09 ENG SVCS 6-17-17 THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206633
7/31/2017
Project PW1609
Transaction Date 9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$33,486.00
Refer
5 BOLTONAND MENK, INCORPORA
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA
2017 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 17-05
$12,047.20
ENG SVCS 6-17-17 THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206649
7/31/2017
Project PW1705
Cash Payment
E 401-43117-303 Engineering Fees
2017 LYNWOOD BLVD STREET IMPROV
$3,269.00
PROJ PW 17-01 ENG SVCS 6-17-17 THRU 7-
14-17
Invoice 0206644
7/31/2017
Project PW1701
Cash Payment
E 401-43137-303 Engineering Fees
2017 WILSHIRE/MAYWOOD STREET
$20,182.00
IMPROV PROJ PW 17-02 ENG SVCS 6-17-17
THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206647
7/31/2017
Project PW1702
Cash Payment
E 401-43147-303 Engineering Fees
2017 TUXEDO BLVD PHASE III STREET
$29,013.50
IMPROV PROJ PW 17-03 ENG SVCS 6-17-17
THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206645
7/31/2017
Project PW1703
Cash Payment
E 401-43110-303 Engineering Fees
2017 RETAINING WALL IMPROV PROJ PW
$3,434.50
17-04 ENG SVCS 6-17-17 THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206651
7/31/2017
Project PW1704
Cash Payment
E 427-43121-303 Engineering Fees
2017 CRACK & SEAL COAT IMPROV PROD
$1,388.00
PW 17-07 ENG SVCS 6-17-17 THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206641
7/31/2017
Project PIN1707
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA
2017 SAN SEWER & MANHOLE REHAB PROJ
$1,100.00
17-06 ENG SVCS 6-17-17 THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206650
7/31/2017
Project PW1706
Transaction Date
9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$70,434.20
Refer
6 BOLTON AND MENK, WCORPORA
_
Cash Payment
E 402-43120-300 Professional Srvs
MSA SYSTEM COORD UPDATE SVCS 6-17-
$78.00
17 THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206660 7/31/2017
Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS 6-17-17 $706.67
THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206654 7/31/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS 6-17-17 $706.66
THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206654 7/31/2017
CITY OF MOUND09/06/17 11:18 AM
Page 3
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Invoice 0206658 7/31/2017
Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0206657 7/31/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0206657 7/31/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs
MOUND/MCES DAKOTA RAIL TRAIL $68.67
INTERCEPTOR ENGINEERING SVCS 6-17-17
THRU 7-14-17
MOUND/MCES DAKOTA RAIL TRAIL $68.66
INTERCEPTOR ENGINEERING SVCS 6-17-17
THRU 7-14-17
MOUND/MCES DAKOTA RAIL TRAIL $68.66
INTERCEPTOR ENGINEERING SVCS 6-17-17
THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206657 7/31/2017
Cash Payment E 401-43118-303 Engineering Fees 2018 WESTEDGE BLVD ST IMPROV PROJ $20,615.00
PW18-01 ENG SVCS 6-17-17 THRU 7-14-17
Invoice 0206653 7/31/2017 Project PW1801
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $22,112.49
Fund Summary
$139,790.18
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $139,790.18
Total $139,790.18
•
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$3,158.84
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
$104,295.00
402 MUNICIPAL STAID ST CONSTUCT
$78.00
427 SEAL COAT FUND
$1,388.00
601 WATER FUND
$8,438.82
602 SEWER FUND
$18,558.52
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
$3,873.00
$139,790.18
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $139,790.18
Total $139,790.18
•
Current Period: September 2017
09/06/17 2:53 PM
Page 1
Batch Name 0717HOISINGT User Dollar Amt $6,702.97
Payments Computer Dollar
Amt $6,702.97
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 HOIS/NGTON KOEGLER GROUP, /
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
MISC PLANNING SVCS JULY 2017
$218.75
Invoice 007-001-109 8/7/2017
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
MOUND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2040
$5,736.72
PLANNING SVCS JULY 2017
Invoice 017-003-6 8/7/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23401 PC16-24 6639 BARTLETT D
6639 BARTLETT SERENITY HILLS
$47.50
DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING SVCS JULY 2017
Invoice 015-015-28 8/7/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23410 PC17-19 5459 BARTLETT
5459 BARTLETT BLVD- COMPLETENESS
$171.25
REVIEW -PLANNING SVCS JULY 2017
Invoice 015-015-28 8/712017
Cash Payment G 101-23409 1567 Bluebird PC 17-14Kullb
1567 BLUEBIRD MINOR SUBDV- KULLBERG-
$190.00
PLANNING SVCS JULY 2017
Invoice 015-015-28 8/7/2017
Cash Payment G 101-233796251 WESTEDGE BLVD PC
6251 WESTEDGE MINOR SUBDV PC 17-18
$47.50
PLANNING SVCS JULY 2017
Invoice 015-015-28 8/7/2017
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
4873 SHORELINE MAJOR SUBDV-MISC
$123.75
PLANNING SVCS JULY 2017- TRACK
ESCROW FORTHCOMING
Invoice 015-015-28 8/7/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23380 PC 17-21-17-22 2060 WATE
2060 WATERSIDE LN EP VAR -PC 17-21
$167.50
PLANNING SVCS JULY 2017
Invoice 015-015-28 8/7/2017
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$6,702.97
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$6,702.97
$6,702.97
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $6,702.97
Total $6,702.97
�'i
Current Period: August 2017
Batch Name RYANCONT#8 User Dollar Amt $194,771.65
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $194,771.65
Refer 8 RYAN CONTRACTING COMPANY
Cash Payment E 401-43116-500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 080817 8/1/2017
Cash Payment E 401-43136-500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 080817 8/1/2017
Cash Payment E 401-43146-500 Capital Outlay FA
$0.00 In Balance
08/18/17 10:40 AM
Page 1
PAY REQUEST #8 2016 STREET IMPROV
$78,970.30
PROD -PW 16-01 BARTLETT BLVD- WORK
COMPLETED JUNE 1 THRU JULY 31 2017
Project PW1601
PAY REQUEST #8 2016 STREET IMPROV
$70,953.27
PROD -PW 16-02 TUXEDO BLVD- WORK
COMPLETED JUNE 1 THRU JULY 31 2017
Project PW1602
PAY REQUEST #8 2016 STREET IMPROV
$45,165.65
PROD -PW 16-03 CYPRESS/MAYWOOD-
WORK COMPLETED JUNE 1 THRU JULY 31
2017
Invoice 080817 8/1/2017 Project PW1603
Cash Payment E 401-43110-500 Capital Outlay FA PAY REQUEST #8 2016 RETAINING WALL -$317.57
IMPROV PROJ -PW 16-04 WORK
COMPLETED JUNE 1 THRU JULY 31 2017
Invoice 080817 8/1/2017 Project PW1604
Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $194,771.65
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $194,771.65
$194,771.65
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $194,771.65
Total $194,771.65
CITY OF MOUND 08/18/17 10:27 AM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: August 2017
Invoice 080817
7/31/2017
Project PW1702
Cash Payment
E 401-43147-500 Capital Outlay FA
PAY REQ #4 2017 STREET IMPROV PROD -
$15,243.01
PW 17-03 TUXEDO BLVD PHASE III -WORK
COMPLETED JULY 18 THRU 312017
Invoice 080817
7/31/2017
Project PW1703
Cash Payment
E 401-43110-500 Capital Outlay FA
PAY REQ #4 2017 STREET IMPROV PROJ -
$23.14
PW 17-04 RETAINING WALL REPLACE -
WORK COMPLETED JULY 18 THRU 31 2017
Invoice 080817
7/31/2017
Project PW1704
Cash Payment
E 401-43137-500 Capital Outlay FA
PAY REQ #4 2017 STREET IMPROV PROJ -
$185.06
PW 17-02 WILSHIRE- MISC-WORK
COMPLETED JULY 18 THRU 31 2017
Invoice 080817
7/31/2017
Project PW1702
Transaction Date
8/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$260,233.31
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
$260,233.31
$260,233.31
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $260,233.31
Total $260,233.31
CITY OF MOUND 09/06/17 3:39 PM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Transaction Date 9/5/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,859.66
Refer 2 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply 1500 VA UPS'S- SEWER PARTS $592.10
Invoice 2994332000 8/18/2017
Transaction Date 9/5/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $592.10
Refer 3 BATTERIES PLUS
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply BATTERIES- STREET DEPT $38.56
Invoice 021-376342 8/15/2017
Transaction Date
9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$38.56
Refer
4 BIFFS, INC PORTABLE RESTROO
Cash Payment
E 60249450-383 Gas Utilities
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL)
PHILBROOK PARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC 7-
$89.00
Invoice 091217
8/23/2017
19-17 thru 8- 15-17
Invoice W647454
8/16/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL)
CENTERVIEW BEACH BIFFS RENTAL &
$379.00
SVC 7-19-17 thru 8- 15-17
Invoice W647451
8/16/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL)
MOUND BAY PARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC 7-
$533.00
19-17 thru 8- 15-17
Invoice W647452
8/16/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL)
SKATEPARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC 7- 19-17
$253.00
thru 8-15-17
Invoice W647453
8/16/2017
Transaction Date
9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,254.00
Refer 5 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, IN
Cash Payment E222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying AUGUST 2017- COPIER RENTAL- FIRE DEPT $31.75
Invoice 17660043 8/13/2017
Transaction Date 9/5/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $31.75
Refer 6 CENTERPO/NT ENERGY (MINNEG _
Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 2649 EMERALD DR. LS E3 GENERATOR $21.61
NATL GAS SVC 7-20-17 THRU 8-20-17
Invoice 091217
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 60249450-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 091217
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 60249450-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 091217
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 091217
8/23/2017
4791 NORTHERN RD LS D1 GENERATOR $20.98
NATL GAS SVC 7-20-17 THRU 8-20-17
3303 WATERBURY RD LS GAS SVC 7-20-17 $22.90
THRU 8-20-17
2990 HIGHLAND BLVD LS B1 GENERATOR $20.97
NATL GAS SVC 7-20-17 THRU 8-20-17
-2483-
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 091217
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 091217
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 60249450-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 091217
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 60249450-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 091217
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 091217
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities
Invoice 091217
8/23/2017
CITY OF MOUND 09/06/17 3:39 PM
Page 2
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
4948 BARTLETT LS E2 GENERATOR NATL $24.83
GAS SVC 7-20-17 THRU 8-20-17
4728 CARLOW RD LS GENERATOR NATL $19.03
GAS SVC 7-20-17 THRU 8-20-17
5808 GRANDVIEW BLVD LS GENERATOR $20.97
NATL GAS SVC 7-20-17 THRU 8-20-17
4922 THREE PTS BLVD LS GENERATOR $20.98
NATL GAS SVC 7-20-17 THRU 8-20-17
1758 SUMACH LANE LS GENERATOR NATL $34.49
GAS SVC 7-20-17 THRU 8-20-17
5077 WINDSOR RD LS GENERATOR NATL $20.42
GAS SVC 7-20-17 THRU 8-20-17
Transaction Date 9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$227.18
Refer
35 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG
_
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA
INSTALL NEW SERVICE LINE @ 5260
$1,162.00
LYNWOOD BLVD- D2 LIFT STATION- 2016 LS
PROJECT PW 16-05
Invoice 3000777114
8/24/2017
Project PW1605
Transaction Date
9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,162.00
Refer
7 CENTRAL HYDRAULICS, WCORPO
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
HOSE, MALE & FEMALE PLUTS- Z TURN
$84.03
MOWER
Invoice 0048977
8/24/2017
Transaction Date
9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$84.03
Refer
43 COREY, JOHN & KINBERLY
Cash Payment
G 101-23150 New Construction Escrow
REFUND NEW CONSTRUCTION ESCROW-
$5,000.00
5920 SUNSET RD- J. & K. COREY
Invoice 091217
9/6/2017
Transaction Date
9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,000.00
Refer
8 CUES, INC.
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-205 Computer Hardware/Soft SEWER CAMERA SOFTWARE & SUPPORT
$1,800.00
PLAN- 8-3-17 THRU 8-2-18
Invoice 489295
8/22/2017
Transaction Date
9/1/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,800.00
Refer
9 EMERYS TREE SERVICE, 1NCORP
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal
REMOVE BASSWOOD TREE @ 5060
$825.00
EDGEWATER 7-31-17
Invoice 21518
8/22/2017
Transaction Date
9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$825.00
Refer
10 FIVE TECHNOLOGY
Cash Payment E 101-41920-440 Other Contractual Servic
MONTHLY MANAGED SVC & NETWORK
$1,290.00
MICE- SEPTEMBER 2017
Invoice 10917-22
9/1/2017
Transaction Date
9/5/2017
Wells Fa_24 4- 10100 Total
$1,290.00
CITY OF MOUND 09/06/17 3:39 PM
Page 3
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Refer 11 FRESHWATER HARVESTING, INC
Cash Payment G 281-22822 Channel Maintenance Escro LOST LAKE CHANNEL 6 HOURS- WEED $1,875.00
CUTTING PLUS DISPOSAL -OFFLOAD
Invoice 2017103 8/23/2017
Transaction Date 9/5/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,875.00
Refer 12 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUN/CA
Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NETWORK ETHERNET SVC 8-20-17 THRU 9- $150.00
20-17
Invoice 091217 8/22/2017
Cash Payment E 101-41920-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NETWORK ETHERNET SVC 8-20-17 THRU 9- $175.00
20-17
Invoice 091217 8/22/2017
Transaction Date 9/5/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $325.00
Refer 47 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUN/CA
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -8-30-17- TO 9-29-17
$124.54
Invoice 091217
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -8-30-17- TO 9-29-17
$39.89
Invoice 091217
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -8-30-17- TO 9-29-17
$300.03
Invoice 091217
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -8-30-17- TO 9-29-17
$149.09
Invoice 091217
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -8 -30 -17 -TO 9-29-17
$144.71
Invoice 091217
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -8-30-17- TO 9-29-17
$144,71
Invoice 091217
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41930-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -8-30-17- TO 9-29-17
$435.90
Invoice 091217
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -8-30-17- TO 9-29-17
$145.30
Invoice 091217
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41910-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -8-30-17- TO 9-29-17
$72.65
Invoice 091217
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-42110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -8-30-17- TO 9-29-17
$72.65
Invoice 091217
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41500-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -8-30-17- TO 9-29-17
-$0.01
Invoice 091217
8/30/2017
Transaction Date
9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,629.46
Refer
13 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-395 Gopher One -Call AUGUST 2017 LOCATES
$174.15
Invoice 7080588
8/31/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-395 Gopher One -Call AUGUST 2017 LOCATES
$174.15
Invoice 7080588
8/31/2017
Transaction Date
9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$348.30
Refer
14 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies WATER METER SUPPLIES- 10 15 WATER
$937.96
LID COVERS
Invoice H711170 8/25/2017
•
A
Current Period: September 2017
09/06/17 3:39 PM
Page 4
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs REPAIR WATER METER READER- SENSUS
$508.40
HANDHELD UNIT
Invoice H701374 8/24/2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies
WATER METER CLAMPS OVERPAYMENT
-$737.53
CREDIT
Invoice H242119A
6/19/2017
Transaction Date 9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$708.83
Refer
15 HENNEPIN COUNTY ASSESSORS
Cash Payment
E 101-41550-440 Other Contractual Servic 2016 CONTRACTED ASSESSMENT
$112,000.00
SERVICES
Invoice 1000097575 8/23/2017
Transaction Date 9/1/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$112,000.00
Refer
16 HENNEPIN COUNTY RECORDER
Cash Payment
G 101-23351 PC16-5 XXXDRUMMOND PL ABSTRACT & TORRENS RECORDING -HENN
$46.00
CTY- PC #16-05 51 XX DRUMMOND
Invoice 091217
8/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-49999-430 Miscellaneous
ABSTRACT & TORRENS RECORDING -HENN
$92.00
CTY- 6077 ASPEN - AMEND TO CONSENT &
WAIVER AGREEMENT
Invoice 091217
8/4/2017
Transaction Date 9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$138.00
Refer
17 HOME DEPOT CREDIT (FIRE)
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
SEWER DEPT CLEANERS- SOFT SCRUB,
$211.80
PINESOL, CLR, MEASURING WHEEL,
MAGNET HOKS, SHARPIES, UTILITY KNIFE,
DEWALT 14 PC BLACK OXIDE SET, 10"
PRUNE SAW, WIRE 3 -SHELF UNIT
Invoice 8010644
7/14/2017
Transaction Date 9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$211.80
Refer
18 HOVERSTEN, ERIC
Cash Payment
E 101-41310-331 Use of personal auto
REIMB MILEAGE- CITY MEETINGS- BOLTON
$70.62
& MENK, MCWD, METRO WATERSHED- N.
MPLS - E. HOVERSTEN AUG 2017
Invoice 091217
9/5/2017
Transaction Date
9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$70.62
Refer
19 HYDRO KLEAN
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies
CASES OF WHITE, GREEN & BLUE
$810.00
MARKING PAINT
Invoice 58407
8/16/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
LIQUID POWER TRACING DYE-
$78.40
YELLOW/GREEN
Invoice 58435
8/22/2017
Transaction Date
9/1/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$888.40
Refer
20 LAKE RESTORATION, INC.
Cash Payment
E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic
SHORELINE DR POND -PARKING DECK
$260.00
AREA TREATMENT #5- DUCKWEED,
SUBMERGED WEEDS & ALGAE
Invoice 168623
8/22/2017
Transaction Date
9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$260.00
Refer
21 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC _ _
-2486-
CITY OF MOUND 09/06/17 3:39 PM
Page 5
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
MISC PARTS- HEX CAP SCREWS, SPLIT
$117.16
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
LOCK WASHER ZINC, FLATT WASHERS,
$13.43
Invoice P60585
8/24/2017
HEX NUTS, PUB WKS DEPT
Invoice 9305169844 8/17/2017
Project 17-3
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Transaction Date
9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$117.16
Refer
22 MINNESOTA BUSINESS ENTERPRI
E 101-41930-460 Janitorial Services
JANITORIAL SVC- AUG 2017— CITY HALL
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
DUMP 5 TON OF ROAD MATERIALS-
$35.00
Cash Payment
ASPHALT 8-1-17
JANITORIAL SVC- AUG 2017-- FIRE DEPT
Invoice 59860301 8/1/2017
Invoice 0917Z01
9/1/2017
Transaction Date
9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$35.00
Refer
25 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH
Cash Payment
R 601-49400-37170 State fee - Water
3RD QTR 2017 COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY
$5,752.00
SVC CONNECTION FEE
E 602-49450-460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 091217
8/16/2017
Transaction Date
9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,752.00
Refer
23 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR, INCORP
Transaction Date
9/6/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic
SEPT 2017- MONTHLY SERVICE-
$113.30
_
CENTENNIAL BLDG ELEVATOR
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
Invoice 720129
9/1/2017
Invoice 226696
8/3/2017
Transaction Date
9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$113.30
Refer
24 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT-(SCHAR
_
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
FLANGE, GASKETS, TANK VENT- WEED
$37.40
WHIP- PARKS
Invoice P60214
8/14/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
KNOB- GROUNDSMASTER MOWER- PARKS
$13.43
Invoice P60585
8/24/2017
Transaction Date
9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$50.83
Refer
26 MN CLEAN SERVICES, INC.
Cash Payment
E 101-41930-460 Janitorial Services
JANITORIAL SVC- AUG 2017— CITY HALL
$474.80
Invoice 0917201
9/1/2017
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-460 Janitorial Services
JANITORIAL SVC- AUG 2017-- FIRE DEPT
$245.20
Invoice 0917Z01
9/1/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services
JANITORIAL SVC- AUG 2017-- CENTENNIAL
$426.93
BLDG
Invoice 0917Z01
9/1/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-460 Janitorial Services
JANITORIAL SVC- AUG 2017-- PUBLIC
$163.47
WORKS BLDG
Invoice 0917Z01
9/1/2017
Project 17-3
Transaction Date
9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,310.40
Refer
27 MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS, IN
_
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
1/4" FINE MIX- 1.50 TON DELIVERED 8-01-17
$118.50
Invoice 226696
8/3/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
3/4" MINUS MIX -40.65 TON DELIVERED 8-10-
$902.43
17
Invoice 226997 8/11/2017
Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 3/4" MINUS MIX- 117.58 TON DELIVERED 8- $2,610.28
09-17
Invoice 226927 8/10/2017
Transaction Date 9/1/2017 Wells Fa -2487 10100 Total $3,631.21
CITY OF MOUND 09/06/17 3:39 PM
Page 6
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Refer 28 NAPA AUTO PARTS - SPRING PAR
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply BFLUID DOT 3 - 32 OZ- PUB WKS SHOP $12.58
Invoice 0577-028660 8/4/2017 Project 17-3
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12.58
Refer 29 OFFICE DEPOT _
Cash Payment E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies SHARPIES, 6 X 9 & 9 X 12, 10 X 13 $56.36
ENVELOPES, LAMINATING POUCHES,
RUBBER BANDS- CITY HALL
Invoice 954474577001 8/17/2017 PO 24820
Cash Payment E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 954474657001 8/17/2017 PO 24820
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 954474577001 8/17/2017 PO 24820
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 954474577001 8/17/2017 PO 24820
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 954474577001 8/17/2017 PO 24820
9 X 12 ENVELOPES- CITY HALL $9.29
HI -YIELD INK CARTRIDGES- PUB WKS $118.97
Project 17-3
KING SIZE SHARPIE MARKERS- PUB WKS $7.25
UTILITIES
KING SIZE SHARPIE MARKERS- PUB WKS $7.25
UTILITIES
Transaction Date 9/5/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $199.12
Refer 30 ORONO, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners HENNEP CTY JAIL CHARGES- PER DIEM
$281.09
FEES JULY 2017
Invoice 20140971 8/17/2017
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$281.09
Refer 31 REPUBLIC SERVICES
Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispose SEPT 2017 GARBAGE SVC- PUB WRKS
$122.92
Invoice 0894-004430177 8/25/2017 Project 17-3
Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic AUG 2017 CITYWIDE RECYCLING SVC
$14,494.95
Invoice 0894-004427839 8/25/2017
Cash Payment E 101-41930-384 Refuse/Garbage Disposa SEPT 2017 GARBAGE SVC
$48.59
Invoice 0894-004430177 8/25/2017
Cash Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Disposa SEPT 2017 GARBAGE SVC
$48.58
Invoice 0894-004430177 8/25/2017
Cash Payment E 101-41910-384 Refuse/Garbage Disposa SEPT 2017 GARBAGE SVC- CENTENNIAL
$98.63
BLDG
Invoice 0894-004427883 8/25/2017
Transaction Date 5/3/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14,813.67
Refer 44 ROBARGE ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cash Payment E 401-43137-300 Professional Srvs VALVE REPAIR- 2017 STREET IMPROV $895.00
PROD PW 17-02- @ LAKEWOOD LN &
WILSHIRE BLVD
Invoice 11157 8/7/2017
Project PW1702
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $895.00
Refer 32 SPORTACULAR, INC.
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms SEW FLUORESCENT YELLOW PATCHES $80.00
OVER NAMES ON JACKETS- QTY 16- PUB
WKS UNIFORMS
Invoice 7691 8/15/2017 Project 17-5
-2488-
CITY OF MOUND 09/06/17 3:39 PM
Page 7
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Transaction Date 9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$80.00
Refer
33 STANDARD SPRING- TRUCK PART
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
TRUC, PARTS FOR WATER DEPT TRUCK
$1,722.72
#109
Invoice 367297
8/3/2017 PO 24838
Transaction Date 9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,722.72
Refer
34 STA -SAFE LOCKSMITHS COMPAN
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-402 Building Maintenance
ADJUST FRONT DOOR LOCK- PUBLIC
$62.00
SAFETY BLDG
Invoice 0020620 8/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41930-400 Repairs & Maintenance
ADJUST FRONT DOOR LOCK- PUBLIC
$62.00
SAFETY BLDG
Invoice 0020620 8/4/2017
Transaction Date 9/5/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$124.00
Refer
36 STUFF -IT MOVING & STORAGE
Cash Payment
E 101-49999-430 Miscellaneous
20' CONTAINER RENTAL 8-20-17 THRU 9-19-
$189.00
17 @ 6077 ASPEN RD - ABATEMENT
Invoice 203016
8/20/2017
Transaction Date 916/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$189.00
Refer
37 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY
Cash Payment
E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing
LEGAL NTCE- AMEND CITY CODE- CHPT
$19.28
129- ALLOW USE OF AUTOMATIC POOL
COVER AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO FENCE -
PUBLISHED 8-19-17
Invoice 520827
8/19/2017
Cash Payment
E 355-47000-351 Legal Notices Publishing
LEGAL NTCE- 2016 ANNUAL TIF
$42.41
DISCLOSURE- PUBLISHED 8-5-17
Invoice 515621
8/5/2017
Cash Payment
E 375-47200-351 Legal Notices Publishing
LEGAL NTCE- 2016 ANNUAL TIF
$42.40
DISCLOSURE- PUBLISHED 8-5-17
Invoice 515621
8/5/2017
Cash Payment
G 101-233814873 SHORELINE PC 17-23
LEGAL NTCE- PUBLIC HEARING TO
$46.26
CONSIDER MAJOR SUBDV- PRELIM PLAT &
COMP PLAN AMENDMENT- 4873 SHORELINE
DR 8-26-17
Invoice 522933
8/26/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA
LEGAL NTCE- 2017 SANITARY SEWER
$177.33
IMPROV PROJ- MANHOLE REHAB BIDS PW
17-06- PUB 9-2-17
Invoice 525941
9/2/2017
Transaction Date
9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$327.68
Refer
38 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR COMP
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay FA
16 X 16 CORNELL SERVICE DOOR CHAIN-
$8,500.00
FOR PUB WKS SALT SHED BLDG
Invoice 746716
7/21/2017
Transaction Date
9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$8,500.00
Refer
39 ULINE
Cash Payment
E 101-41930-210 Operating Supplies
KLEENEX MULTIFOLD TOWELS- 20 CASES -
$492.60
PUB SAFETY BLDG- CITY HALL
Invoice 89749416 8/21/2017
-2489-
CITY OF MOUND 09/06/17 3:39 PM
Page 8
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 89749416 8/21/2017
Cash Payment E 285-46388-210 Operating Supplies
KLEENEX MULTIFOLD TOWELS- 20 CASES - $492.60
PUB SAFETY BLDG- FIRE DEPT
AIR FRESHENER DISPENSER- PARKING $51.60
DECK
Invoice 89749416 8/21/2017
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,036.80
Refer 40 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE -
Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies KILLZALL CONCENTRATE 2.5 GAL- PARKS $59.99
Invoice 855492 8/14/2017
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $59.99
Refer 45 WACON/A FORD MERCURY
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies ANTI FREEZE TRUCK #112- PUB WKS $27.93
UTILITIES
Invoice 88708
8/15/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 88708
8/15/2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 88595
8/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 88595
8/4/2017
ANTI FREEZE TRUCK #112- PUB WKS $27.93
UTILITIES
RADIATOR PARTS- PUB WKS UTILITIES $441.69
TRUCK #112
RADIATOR PARTS- PUB WKS UTILITIES $441.68
TRUCK #112
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$939.23
Refer 46 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN _
Cash Payment E 101-41930-384 Refuse/Garbage Disposa GARBAGE SVC AMAY 2017- CITY HALL &
$80.48
FIRE DEPT
Invoice 7058062-1593-9 8/29/2017
Cash Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Disposa GARBAGE SVC SEPT 2017- CITY HALL &
$80.48
FIRE DEPT
Invoice 7058062-1593-9 8/29/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Disposa GARBAGE SVC SEPT 2017- PARKS
$519.52
Invoice 7058063-1593-7 8/29/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Disposa GARBAGE SVC SEPT 2017- PUB WKS BLDG
$83.77
Invoice 7058064-1593-5 8/29/2017 Project 17-3
Transaction Date 9/3/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$764.25
Refer 42 XCEL ENERGY _
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities SHORELINE -COMMERCE STREET LIGHTS 7-
$83.32
25-17 THRU 8-25-17
Invoice 559291292 8/24/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC 7-25-17 THRU 8-25-17
$81.58
CARLOW RD LIFT STATION
Invoice 559352605 8/25/2017
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$164.90
Refer 41 XCEL ENERGY _
Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 6-25-17 TO 7-25-17
$212.77
Invoice 557823972 8/14/2017
-2490-
F97MIT =I -
Current Period: September 2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 557823972 8/14/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 557823972 8/14/2017
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 557823972 8/14/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 557823972 8/14/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 557823972 8/14/2017
Cash Payment E 101-41930-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 557823972 8/14/2017
Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 557823972 8/14/2017
Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 557823972 8/14/2017
Cash Payment E 285-46388-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 557823972 8/14/2017
Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities
Invoice 557823972 8/14/2017
09/06/17 3:39 PM
Page 9
ELECTRIC SVC - 6-25-17 TO 7-25-17- DEPOT $61.15
BLDG
ELECTRIC SVC - 6-25-17 TO 7-25-17 $3,940.47
ELECTRIC SVC - 6-25-17 TO 7-25-17 $1,606.38
ELECTRIC SVC - 6-25-17 TO 7-25-17 $4,275.41
ELECTRIC SVC - 6-25-17 TO 7-25-17 $2,287.82
ELECTRIC SVC - 6-25-17 TO 7-25-17 $1,629.70
ELECTRIC SVC - 6-25-17 TO 7-25-17 $1,629.70
ELECTRIC SVC - 6-25-17 TO 7-25-17 $1,831.64
ELECTRIC SVC - 6-25-17 TO 7-25-17 $1,454.45
ELECTRIC SVC - 6-25-17 TO 7-25-17 $42.61
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18,972.10
Fund Summary
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $194,711.72
Total $194,711.72
-2491-
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$142,328.39
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
$2,885.61
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
$1,875.00
285 MOUND HRA
$1,506.05
355 2003-C G.O. TIF 1-2
$42.41
375 TIF 1-3 Debt Service
$42.40
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
$895.00
601 WATER FUND
$13,254.69
602 SEWER FUND
$14,539.37
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$2,587.85
670 RECYCLING FUND
$14,494.95
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
$260.00
$194,711.72
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $194,711.72
Total $194,711.72
-2491-
Batch Name 091217CITY2
Payments
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 9:19 AM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
User Dollar Amt
Computer Dollar Amt
Refer 1 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS
Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers -Fire Dept.
$13,777.64
$13,777.64
$0.00 In Balance
PAGERS- BAT UL IMPRES 2 2650T IP68 $509.00
QTY 4- FIRE DEPT
Invoice 71943 8/17/2017
Transaction Date 9/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $509.00
Refer 2 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous RENTAL & MTCE- COFFEE MACHINE FIRE $72.00
DEPT
Invoice 491071 9/1/2017
Transaction Date 9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$72.00
Refer
10 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies
HIGH PRESSURE MEDIUM CYLINDER
$26.04
RENTALS- QTY 9
Invoice 00095202 8/31/2017
Project 17-3
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies
HIGH PRESSURE ACETYLENE MEDIUM
$8.68
CYLINDER RENTALS- QTY 5
Invoice 00095202 8/31/2017
Project 17-3
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$34.72
Refer
3 EMERGENCY RESPONSE SOLUTI
_
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-440 Other Contractual Servic SCABA FLOW TEST- FIRE DEPT
$76.53
Invoice 9180
8/4/2017 PO 24738
Transaction Date
9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$76.53
Refer
4 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES, i
_
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair
ELKHART TWIST LOCK SUB ASSEMBLY FOR
$152.27
8297 MONITOR- FIRE VEHICLE #29
Invoice 9782
8/30/2017
Transaction Date
9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$152.27
Refer
5 GRAINGER
_
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-402 Building Maintenance
BLDG WIRE, CONNECTOR SCREW SETS,
$201.91
THREADED COUPLING, GOVT ON CIRCUIT
BREAKER, BUSHING, LIQUID TIGHT
CONDUIT, EMT CONDUIT- FIRE DEPT
Invoice 9520894743 8/15/2017
Transaction Date
9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$201.91
Refer
6 HOME DEPOT CREDIT (FIRE)
_
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-460 Janitorial Services
BLACK MILK CRATES -3, SCRUB SPONGE 9
$59.43
PK, AJAX SOAP- 2 LG, SOFT SCRUB W/
BLEACH- FIRE DEPT
Invoice 8064926
8/23/2017
Transaction Date
9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$59.43
Refer
7 MEDPAC BAGS, INC.
_
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies
MED PAC 2800 MEDICAL BAGS- RED 4 QTY
$887.96
Invoice 3030762
8/22/2017
Transaction Date
9/6/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$887.96
Refer
13 MN DEPT TRANSPORTATION
_ -2492-
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 9:19 AM
Page 2
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Cash Payment E 401-43117-300 Professional Srvs
Invoice P00008404 8/31/2017
Cash Payment E 401-43137-300 Professional Srvs
BITUMINOUS PLANT INSPECTION JULY
2017 - 2017 STREET PROJ PW 17-01 & 17-02
BITUMINOUS PLANT INSPECTION JULY
2017 - 2017 STREET PROD PW 17-01 & 17-02
$230.49
$230.49
Invoice P00008404 8/31/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $460.98
Refer 9 MN FALL EXPO
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-434 Conference & Training
Invoice 091217
9/6/2017 PO 24839
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-434 Conference & Training
Invoice 091217
9/6/2017 PO 24839
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training
Invoice 091217
9/6/2017 PO 24839
Cash Payment
E 101-43100434 Conference & Training
Invoice 091217
9/6/2017 PO 24839
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training
Invoice 091217
9/6/2017 PO 24839
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training
Invoice 091217
9/6/2017 PO 24839
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training
Invoice 091217
9/6/2017 PO 24839
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training
Invoice 091217
9/6/2017 PO 24839
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training
2017 MN FALL MTCE EXPO REGISTRATION $25.00
OCT 4TH- ST. CLOUD- G. BALL
2017 MN FALL MTCE EXPO REGISTRATION $25.00
OCT 5TH- ST. CLOUD- D. GRADY
2017 MN FALL MTCE EXPO REGISTRATION $25.00
OCT 4TH- ST. CLOUD- F. HEITZ
2017 MN FALL MTCE EXPO REGISTRATION $25.00
OCT 4TH- ST. CLOUD- B. KRESS
2017 MN FALL MTCE EXPO REGISTRATION $25.00
OCT 4TH- ST. CLOUD- T. PALM
2017 MN FALL MTCE EXPO REGISTRATION $25.00
OCT 4TH- ST. CLOUD- M. RADDE
2017 MN FALL MTCE EXPO REGISTRATION $25.00
OCT 5TH- ST. CLOUD- S. KIVISTO
2017 MN FALL MTCE EXPO REGISTRATION $25.00
OCT 5TH- ST. CLOUD- R. LARSON
2017 MN FALL MTCE EXPO REGISTRATION $25.00
OCT 5TH- ST. CLOUD- R. PRICH
Invoice 091217
9/6/2017 PO 24839
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$225.00
Refer
8 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOC/AT/O
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-124 Fire Pens Contrib
SEPT 2017 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION
$10,750.00
CONTRIBUTION
Invoice 091217
9/1/2017
Transaction Date
1/19/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$10,750.00
Refer
11 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE)
Cash Payment
E 101-42115-210 Operating Supplies
CLEAR STORAGE BOXES 4 LITER- QTY 17-
$144.33
EMERGENCY MGMT
Invoice 956467192001 8/23/2017 PO 24754
Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 956465253001 8/18/2017 PO 24753
Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 9564653032001 8/18/2017 PO 24753
COPY PAPER, TONER, NOTE PADS, 4 LITER
CLEAR STORAGE BOX, LABELS- FIRE DEPT
#10 ENVELOPES- FIRE DEPT
$114.08
$8.02
Transaction Date 9!7/2017 Wells FP -n 10100 Total $266.43
-2493-
Current Period: September 2017
Refer 12 SHERWIN WILLIAMS COMPANY
09/07/17 9:19 AM
Page 3
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$269.33
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
$12,912.61
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
$460.98
601 WATER FUND
$50.00
602 SEWER FUND
$84.72
$13,777.64
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $13,777.64
Total $13,777.64
-2494-
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 12:02 PM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Batch Name 091217CITY3 User Dollar Amt $605.82
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $605.82
$0.00 In Balance
Refer
44 TRUE VALUE HWS
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies
CLEANER, 32CT TRASH BAGS- HWS
$25.95
Invoice 145230
7/7/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies
GE 32W 4' FLUORESCENT TUBE LIGHT- HWS
$14.45
Invoice 145275
7/10/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$40.40
Refer
45 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE)
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
RED DUCT TAPE, GREY DUCT TAPE- FIRE
$10.78
DEPT TRAINING
Invoice 145696
7/24/2017
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
RED 18 GA PRIM WIRE, ELEC TAPE, MINI
$45.07
FUSE HOLDER, 100 PK CABLE TIES, BLK
MOUNTING BASE, SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS
Invoice 145860
7/29/2017
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-322 Postage
FED EX SHIPPING - 8-1-17 CHAIN TO
$19.55
CUTTER'S EDGE- FIRE DEPT
Invoice 145948
8/1/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$75.40
Refer
46 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS)
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
2 PK DUST RESPIRATOR
$6.29
Invoice 145123
7/3/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
13' RATCH TIE DOWN
$9.89
Invoice 145194
7/6/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
PRIMER, 9' 5WIRE FRAME MWD HANDLE,
$47.32
GRAFFITI REMOVER SPRAY, PAINT TRAY
Invoice 145234
7/7/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
SS CLAMP
$2.06
Invoice 145288
7/10/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
#2 PHIL SCREW BIT
$8.24
Invoice 145533
7/19/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
CLEAR COAT CABLE
$5.29
Invoice 145568
7/20/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
4 X 50 GRASS SEED BALNKET
$23.39
Invoice 145710
7/25/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
FOAM MOUNTING TAPE
$11.68
Invoice 145780
7/27/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$114.16
Refer 47 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS)
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply GALVANIZED NIPPLES $10.15
Invoice 145890 7/31/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply DUCT TAPE- COLORED- 6 ROLLS, 17 OZ $35.93
RED MARK PAINT- WATER DEPT
Invoice 145565 7/20/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply GALVANIZED NIPPLES $3.23
Invoice 145542 7/19/2017
-2495-
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 12:02 PM
Page 2
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply 15 CT GAL SLIDE STORAGE BAGS- WATER $5.38
DEPT
Invoice 145279 7/10/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $54.69
Refer 48 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS)
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
8 X 100 CLEAR REIN HOSE, HOSE MENDER,
$5.98
SS MINI CLAMPS- PUB WKS SHOP
Invoice 145723
7/25/2017
Project 17-3
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
SS QUICK LINK
$18.88
Invoice 145146
7/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
DURACELL 4 PK 9V ALK BATTERIES
$15.99
Invoice 145148
7/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
THRD STL ROD, 4 PK BLK LEG TIP -S,
$23.62
SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS- SEWER DEPT
Invoice 145331 7/12/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 145427 7/15/2017
Cash Payment G 101-22802 Festival
Invoice 145457 7/17/2017
Cash Payment G 101-22802 Festival
Invoice 145456 7/17/2017
500 OZ AJAX LIQ DETERGENT, GRILL BRUSH $10.68
CLOTHESLINE- SPIRIT OF THE LAKES $17.98
FESTIVAL
FEED SCOOP- SPIRIT OF THE LAKES $8.98
FESTIVAL
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $102.11
Refer 49 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS)
Cash Payment E 285-46388-210 Operating Supplies 3 OZ DEODORIZER- URINAL BLOCK- $4.93
PARKING DECK
Invoice 145819 7/28/2017
Cash Payment E 285-46388-210 Operating Supplies 15 OZ CLEANER/POLISH-PARKING DECK $12.46
Invoice 145703 7/25/2017
Cash Payment E 285-46388-210 Operating Supplies CLOROX 64 OZ REG BLEACH- PARKING $2.99
DECK
Invoice 145559 7/20/2017
Cash Payment E285-46388-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 145541 7/19/2017
Cash Payment E285-46388-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 145329 7/12/2017
IRON SHAPED SCRUBBER, GAL SIMPLE
GREEN 32 OZ NATURAL BOTTLE SPRAYER -
PARKING DECK
2402 TOIL BOWL CLEANER- PARKING DECK
$17.79
$3.14
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $41.31
Refer 50 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS)
Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies 2 PK WASK KILLER $19.20
Invoice 145703-2 7/25/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies GAL COVERED PITCHER, 1- CUP PLASTIC $11.68
MEASURING CUP- CHEMICALS HANGING
BASKETS- DOWNTOWN
Invoice 145718 7/25/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS $0.65
Invoice 145570 7/20/2017
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 12:02 PM
Page 3
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
5' GREEN FENCE POST FOR LOW AREA
$53.91
WATER- FESTIVAL
Invoice 145606 7/21/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies
2 PK WASK KILLER
$9.99
Invoice 145702 7/25/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies
DEPOT-- 6 PK LIQUID ANT BAIT
$6.74
Invoice 145327 7/12/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
UTILITY KINIFE TO CUT SOD
$10.79
Invoice 145312 7/11/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
20LB SUN SHADE GRASS SEED- PARKS
$64.79
Invoice 145209 7/6/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$177.75
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$318.87
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
$75.40
285 MOUND HRA
$41.31
601 WATER FUND
$54.69
602 SEWER FUND
$75.15
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$40.40
$605.82
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $605.82
Total $605.82
Batch Name 091217CITY4
Payments
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 12:27 PM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
User Dollar Amt
Computer Dollar Amt
Refer 51 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS (FIRE)
$543.07
$543.07
$0.00 In Balance
Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair TRUCK PARTS- FIRE DEPT VEHICLE REPAIR $73.92
Invoice 6974-299577 7/20/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $73.92
Refer 52 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P449
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 RepaidMaint Supply MICRO V BELT TYMCO SWEEPER #304 $42.56
Invoice 6974-298182 7/5/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply AIR, OIL & FUEL FILTERS- SEWER TRUCK $77.52
#209
Invoice 6974-298400 7/7/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-300090 7/27/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-299662 7/21/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-298408 7/7/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 RepaidMaint Supply
Invoice 6974-298416 7/7/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-230098 7127/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-300123 7/2712017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply
Invoice 6974-300124 7/27/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply
Invoice 6974-300070 7/27/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-300190 7/28/2017
TRAILER LIGHT LED- PARKS TRAILER $45.99
AIR, OIL FILTERS- PARKS $5.71
OIL SEAL- 2011 FORD F550 #210- PARKS $44.79
DISC BRAKE CALIPER RETURN CREDIT- -$110.00
PARKS
BRAKE PADS- #512 WATER TRUCK $64.33
FUEL FILTER #512 WATER TRUCK $39.90
OIL FILTER- #512 WATER TRUCK $21.00
TIE ROD END- WATER TRUCK $110.25
CREDIT RETURN TIE ROD END- WATER -$110.25
TRUCK
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply OIL FILTER WATER TRUCK #109 $2.87
Invoice 6974-300071 7/27/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply WATER TRUCKS- 2 BATTERIES $234.48
Invoice 6974-298269 7/6/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $469.15
PAR1.0
[M=
Current Period: September 2017
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$29.05
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
$73.92
601 WATER FUND
$362.58
602 SEWER FUND
$77.52
$543.07
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $543.07
Total $543.07
09/07/17 12:27 PM
Page 2
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 11:30 AM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Batch Name 091217HWS User Dollar Amt $122,870.69
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $122,870.69
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$164.24
Invoice 1913724103 8/29/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$107.28
Invoice 1914724804 9/5/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Due 12/31/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$271.52
Refer 2 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$121.52
Invoice 1935723104 8/19/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$148.26
Invoice 1935723405 8/22/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$321.04
Invoice 1935724511 9/2/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Due 12/31/2014
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$590.82
Refer 3 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$613.80
Invoice 3201095 8/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
-$26.88
Invoice 394848 8/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$605.70
Invoice 3202656 8/24/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$538.20
Invoice 3204517 8/31/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$1,730.82
Refer 5 BELLBOY CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$224.00
Invoice 60503600 9/1/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$8.55
Invoice 60503600 9/1/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$324.00
Invoice 60503600 9/1/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$15.50
Invoice 60401100 8/25/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$1,162.50
Invoice 60401100 8/25/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$1,734.55
Refer 6 BELLBOY CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$2,266.70
Invoice 60416600 8/28/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR CREDIT
-$143.50
Invoice 60396400 8/24/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$34.36
Invoice 60350500 8/23/2017
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 11:30 AM
Page 2
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$2,949.37
Invoice 60350500 8/23/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,106.93
Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION
$448.00
Invoice 378698 8/30/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies
SUPPLIES, BAGS, C -FOLD TOWELS
$270.80
Invoice 96337500 8/23/2017
BEER
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$24.00
Invoice 96362400 8/28/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R
MDSE- COOLER- 28 QT
$99.00
Invoice 96337500 8/23/2017
Refer 8 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN
_
Gash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies
SUPPLIES- DUM DUM POPS
$14.00
Invoice 96394100 9/1/2017
$349.75
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa
MIX
$69.20
Invoice 60503700 9/1/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa
MIX
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$4.10
Invoice 60503700 9/1/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $481.10
Refer 7 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$72.80
Invoice 378696 8/30/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$448.00
Invoice 378698 8/30/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,219.75
Invoice 378697 8/30/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$2,740.55
Refer 8 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN
_
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$349.75
Invoice 377350 8/23/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa
MIX
$31.20
Invoice 377349 8/23/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$782.80
Invoice 376076 8/16/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$1,163.75
Refer 10 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE
_
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$53.00
Invoice 1090748735 8/16/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,357.20
Invoice 1090748734 8/16/2017
Transaction Date 9!7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$2,410.20
Refer 9 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$8,002.56
Invoice 1090751656 8/23/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$196.80
Invoice 1090751657 8/23/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$12,165.42
Invoice 1090754870 8/30/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fa -n
10100 Total
$20,364.78
-2501-
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 11:30 AM
Page 3
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Refer 11 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$296.00
Invoice 10802679360 8/23/2017
Cash Payment
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$191.16
Invoice 10802678455 8/22/2017
8/29/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa
MIX
$122.83
Invoice 10802680539 8/24/2017
-$13.20
Invoice 355-233
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$3,316.29
Invoice 10802680538 8/24/2017
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $3,926.28
Refer 12 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE
Transaction Date
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$296.00
Invoice 1080677410 8/17/2017
16 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO.
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$96.00
Invoice 1080677409 8/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$199.60
Invoice 1080677715 8/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$1,407.60
Invoice 1080677408 8/17/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $1,999.20
Refer 13 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$330.67
Invoice 1080682766 8/30/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$3,224.83
Invoice 1080683390 8/31/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$66.09
Invoice 1080683391 8/31/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$224.15
Invoice 1080684271 9/1/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $3,845.74
Refer 15 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES, L.P.
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 1975570 8/22/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 1975571 8/22/2017
BEER $6,441.30
BEER $77.00
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,518.30
Refer 14 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES, L.P
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,210.20
Invoice 1980637
8/29/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$53.90
Invoice 1980638
8/29/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
-$13.20
Invoice 355-233
8/29/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
-$35.60
Invoice 355-235
8/29/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $3,215.30
Refer
16 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO.
5wom
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 11:30 AM
Page 4
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Cash Payment
E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$336.00
Invoice 67-2378 8/24/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $336.00
Refer
17 COCA COLA BOTTLING -MIDWEST
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa
COCA COLA PRODUCTS-
MIX
$229.98
Invoice 3601204495 8/29/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $229.98
Refer
18 DAHLHE/MER BEVERAGE LLC
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$245.00
Invoice 157972
8/29/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$1,201.50
Invoice 1300979 8/29/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$1,016.50
Invoice 1300880 8/22/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $2,463.00
Refer
19 ENK/ BREWING COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa BEER
$119.88
Invoice 7680
8/16/2017
Cash Payment
E 60949750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa BEER
$209.79
Invoice 7757
8/30/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $329.67
Refer
20 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment
E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$315.00
Invoice 913040
8/18/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$711.00
Invoice 912689
8/17/2017
Cash Payment
E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$1,200.00
Invoice 913971
8/24/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,950.67
Invoice 915570
8/31/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $5,176.67
Refer
22 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN
Cash Payment
E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$169.00
Invoice 2723738
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$7,012.80
Invoice 2723737
8/23/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100
Total $7,181.80
Refer
21 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN
_
Cash Payment
E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$21.50
Invoice 2723777
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$120.35
Invoice 2738615
9/1/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$1,972.20
Invoice 2723776
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$81.55
Invoice 2738613
9/1/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fa 2
_ 10100
Total $2,195.60
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 11:30 AM
Page 5
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Refer
24 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$99.80
Invoice 5799434 8/16/2017
9/1/2017
Transaction Date
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$5,464.01
Invoice 5799432
8/16/2017
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$2,039.50
Invoice 5799433
8/16/2017
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$947.10
Invoice 5810385
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$3,704.70
Invoice 5810383
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$2,729.70
Invoice 5810384
8/30/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $14,984.81
23 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
_Refer
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$37.00
Invoice 5804980
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$4,734.33
Invoice 5804978
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$3,768.20
Invoice 5804979
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$240.00
Invoice 5804977
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$288.00
Invoice 5813249
9/1/2017
Transaction Date
917/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $9,067.53
Refer
25 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$189.00
Invoice 2236
8/22/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 2326
8/25/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 2418
9/1/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Refer
26 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY
BEER
Wells Fargo 10100
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 8-03-17
Invoice 33301
8/3/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 8-07-17
Invoice 33308
8/7/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 8-10-17
Invoice 33325
8/10/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 8-14-17
Invoice 33335
8/14/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer
27 MILLNER HERITAGE VINEYARD &
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Invoice 28397-4 8/30/2017
-2504-
$162.00
$189.00
Total $540.00
$358.15
$47.85
$246.50
$27.55
Total $680.05
$66.00
CITY F MOUND 09/07/17 11:30 AM
Page 6
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT
$2.00
Invoice 28397-4
8/30/2017
32 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Transaction Date
9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$68.00
Refer
28 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA
$537.95
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 7-24-17
$65.19
Invoice 928075880 8/13/2017
Cash Payment
Transaction Date
9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$65.19
Refer
29 MOUND, CITY OF
Cash Payment E 609-49750-382 Water Utilities
Invoice 091217 8/20/2017
WATER SERVICE 06-26-17 THRU 8-2-17 MWS $67.08
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $67.08
Refer 31 PAUST/S AND SONS WINE COMPA
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $751.50
Invoice 8500840 8/21/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $8.75
Invoice 8500840 8/21/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $760.25
Refer 30 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $456.66
Invoice 8601640 8/28/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $7.00
Invoice 8601640 8/28/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $463.66
Refer 33 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Cash Payment
Invoice 2215409
Cash Payment
Invoice 2215407
Cash Payment
Invoice 2215408
Cash Payment
Invoice 2215406
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
8/16/2017
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
8/16/2017
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
8/16/2017
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
8/16/2017
$664.50
$2,535.50
$141.75
$66.00
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $3,407.75
Refer
32 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$537.95
Invoice 2219065
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,823.00
Invoice 2219066
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$386.25
Invoice 2222613
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$1,297.85
Invoice 2222612
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$56.00
Invoice 2217103
8/18/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $4,101.05
Refer
34 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION CO. INC
-2505-
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 11:30 AM
Page 7
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$108.00
Invoice 13543-1855 8/28/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$108.00
Refer 36 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,051.64
Invoice 1582390 8/24/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$2,438.65
Invoice 1582389 8/24/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$171.50
Invoice 1580535 8/18/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$3,661.79
Refer 35 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,247.58
Invoice 1584980 8/31/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$1,424.32
Invoice 1584979 8/31/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$404.87
Invoice 1579835 8/17/174
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$3,025.96
Invoice 1579834 8/17/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$6,102.73
Refer 43 SPRUCE SODA CO.
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa SODA
$68.00
Invoice 1254 8/22/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$68.00
Refer 38 VINOCOP/A, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$198.25
Invoice 0187311 8/25/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$5.00
Invoice 0187311 8/25/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$984.00
Invoice 0187310 8/25/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$15.00
Invoice 0187310 8/25/2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$1,202.25
Refer 37 VINOCOP/A, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$344.89
Invoice 0186729 8/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$5.00
Invoice 0186729 8/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$184.00
Invoice 0186730 8/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$5.00
Invoice 0186730 8/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$475.75
Invoice 0187761 8/31/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$120.00
Invoice 0187760 8/31/2017
-2506-
CITY OF MOUND 09/07/17 11:30 AM
Page 8
Payments
Current Period: September 2017
Transaction Date 9/7/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,134.64
Refer 39 WINE COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$256.00
Invoice 45694
8/17/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$6.30
Invoice 45694
8/17/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$392.00
Invoice 46988
8/31/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$6.30
Invoice 46988
8/31/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$660.60
Refer
40 WINE MERCHANTS
_
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$313.00
Invoice 7146512
8/23/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For
Resa MIX
$19.75
Invoice 7146513
8/23/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$332.75
Refer
41 WINE MERCHANTS
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$536.00
Invoice 7147446
8/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$690.00
Invoice 7145525
8/16/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$1,226.00
Refer
42 WRS IMPORTS, LLC
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$156.00
Invoice 1414
8/19/2017
Transaction Date
9/7/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$156.00
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$122,870.69
$122,870.69
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $122,870.69
Total $122,870.69
1 1- -GWf-UUIAUM�-�-
101oV13
August 22, 2017
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on
Tuesday, August 22, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Centennial Building.
Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid, Council Members Ray Salazar, Kelli Gillispie, Jeff
Bergquist, and Jennifer Peterson
Members absent: none
Others present: City Manager and Director of Public Works Eric Hoversten, Community
Development Director Sarah Smith, Administrative Assistant Mary Mackres, Director of Finance
and Administrative Services Catherine Pausche, Field Officer Stewart Simon, Public Works
Superintendant Ray Hanson, Public Works Street Lead Brent Kress, Public Works Utilities Lead
Ryan Prich, City Attorney Elizabeth Brodeen-Kuo, Joseph Schwebel, Jayne Quinnell, Michelle
Olson, Hayley & Jeremy Nelson, Mark Hanson, Kari McReavy, Paul & Lori Snyder, Traci
Mallonee, Scott Steele, Allan Moran, Brian Blake, Barb Fritsch, Mike &,Cindy Palm, Joleen
Stadsklev, John Range, Tom McDonnell, Susan Hoversten, Johann Chemin, Linda Cordie, and
Kevin Boyle
Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in
nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council
Member or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
considered in normal sequence.
1. Open meeting
Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approve agenda
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Bergquist, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
4. Consent agenda
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Peterson, to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call
vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $283,161.35
B. Approve Minutes: 8/08/17 Regular Meeting
C. RESOLUTION NO. 17-115: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING 2017 CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) PARKING MAINTENANCE ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO
THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 5% INTEREST, LEVY #19677
A. RESOLUTION NO. 17-116: RESOLUTION AMENDING AND RESTATING
RESOLUTION NO. 17-104 RESOLUTION APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY OF MOUND ON BEHALF OF ITS
PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
Mound City Council Minutes —August 22, 2017
E. RESOLUTION NO. 17-117: RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FROM THE CITY OF
MOUND FOR THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT WATERSHE
MANAGEMENTPLAN
F. RESOLUTION NO. 17-118: RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR 20
LAKESIDE LANE I
G. RESOLUTION NO. 17-119: RESOLUTIORESTATING
RESOLUTION NO. 16-124 APPROVING VARIANCES FOR 4804-4820 NORTHERN
"•A!+
H. RESOLUTION NO. 17-120: RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR 2039
ARBORLANE
1. RESOLUTION NO. 17-121: RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR 3231
GLADSTONE
LEI ZRI to • 1.Y
5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda.
Mark Hanson, 5555 Three Points, said there is an easement driveway owned by the City
that leads into Harrison Shores townhomes and a City -owned well -house. Hanson said
several years ago in the spring, the City's water department truck drove up that driveway
while road restrictions were in effect and caused damage to the driveway which is now in
need of repair. Hanson says this driveway is subject to getting ruined again if the City keeps
using this road. Mayor Wegscheid asked if Hanson has had discussions with Staff and
Hanson indicated he had spoken with Hoversten.
Hanson shared pictures of the damaged road, which is east of Commerce, before Lafayette,
which is an easement driveway that leads to a City well -house at the top. Hanson noted the
damage is up and down the hill and that there are huge divots from trucks.
Mayor Wegscheid informed Hanson that this item will be referred back to Staff to recap the
conversations, make recommendations, and include on an upcoming Council agenda.
Lori Snyder, 4789 Dorchester, said she is here because of Mound's water bills. Snyder says
the group does not have a spokesperson but they know that the water bills are very high in
Mound compared to other cities. Mayor Wegscheid said this is something that is part of the
agenda tonight and will be discussed.
Catherine P - Director of Finance and Administrative
of the 1Bud-get• Levy and requesting actionon related
Catherine Pausche presented the 2018 preliminary proposed budget and stated that in
August of each year, the City typically focuses on the General Fund revenue levy and the
total levy, which is what the county uses to produce the estimated tax statements that are
-2509-
Mound City Council Minutes —August 22, 2017
mailed out in November. Pausche noted the total levy cannot go any higher than the
amount set tonight.
Pausche reviewed the General Fund highlights, noting Staff is recommending a 2.5%
increase in the General Fund revenue levy and a 2% increase in the overall levy. Staff is
recommending utilization of $189,000 of General Fund reserves which will produce an
unassigned fund balance of 20% of expenses and $1.5M for inter -fund loans or transfers.
The City's projected tax rate is about the same as this year at 47.4%.
Pausche says that Staff is always keeping an eye on where Mound's rates are averaging
and that Mound's tax rate hit its peak at 57% in 2014, which was a result of the recession
and the declining tax capacity, but General Fund levy and expenditures were basically flat
on average from 2009 — 2018.
Pausche said General Fund expenditures are proposed to increase 2.2% which funds the
essential city services of streets, parks, public safety, etc. Pausche said that when the City
contracted for police services, savings of $200,000 per year where projected, but the
contract is subject to inflationary increases tied to CPI.
Pausche said Staff allocations were modified to better reflect how the positions spend their
time, which meant more expense was moved to the General Fund for the Field Officer and a
Public Works maintenance worker. Pausche said capital expenditure requests are up
$130K from prior year, including two new trucks for Streets and the replacement of the
remaining roof sections at the Centennial Building.
Pausche proposed to create additional capital project related funds to help smooth the
fluctuations from year to year and to plan for the future. Pausche said Staff is working on a
10 -year financial plan which would include both inventories and replacement schedules so
the City Council could focus on priorities. Pausche said the plan will be a main topic at the
October 17th workshop.
Pausche reviewed the Mound property taxes, noting Mound's tax base is mostly residential
and only 5% commercial, with off -lake properties making up 75% of parcels paying 47% of
taxes, and on -lake making up 20% of parcels and paying about 43% of the taxes.
Pausche shared a summary by fund of the 2018 proposed budget, noting General Fund
capital expenditures of $341 K and use of reserves of $189K. Pausche noted the Area Fire
Fund has also proposed to use some of their reserves for equipment this year.
Pausche discussed what drives increases to tax and utility rates, saying the primary reason
are investments in infrastructure, in addition to covering operating and capital expenditures.
Pausche said Mound's rates are compared to other cities annually, but it is important to also
compare the size and age of infrastructure, as well as the amount of investment that has
been made.
Pausche showed a breakdown of investments in infrastructure through 2016. Investments
have included $32.3M in street and retaining wall reconstructions. $19M was invested in
water system improvements associated directly with those street repairs, a new water tower
and pump houses, and improvements to the distribution network to improve service volume
and capacity. $9.8M in sanitary sewer system improvements included replacement of 19 of
the 30 City lift stations, and lining of sewer pipes to reduce groundwater infiltration. $5.9M in
bonds have been issued for storm water improvements most generally linked to the street
-2510-
Mound City Council Minutes — August 22, 2017
reconstruction efforts. An additional $8.8M in bonds have been issued for redevelopment
related activities in the Lost Lake/Harbor Districts. Pausche said Mound's aging
infrastructure required a response and topography/lakes caused unique challenges,
including 30 lift stations and the need for watermain looping to improve water quality.
Pausche shared the ratio comparison showing Mound as compared to cities with
populations of 2,500 - 10,000 that is part of the annual management letter from the City's
auditors. Pausche said the $75M investment shows that Mound is highly leveraged, with
the debt to assets and debt per capita higher than the peer group average, but also noted
Mound's operating expenses are less than the peer group average, which reflects a direct
effort to be as lean and efficient as possible.
Pausche showed comparisons of infrastructure with neighboring cities of St. Boni and
Delano. For Mound, its infrastructure is 30-50 years old, which means that it was at the end
of its useful life. Mound also has 60 miles of sewer line, compared to 10 miles in St. Boni
and 30 miles in Delano.
Pausche shared a chart with city comparisons showing three other cities and what they pay
to the Met Council and how many miles of sewer and the number of lift stations they have.
While Pausche acknowledged that Mound has high base utility rates, neighboring cities
such as Delano get to a higher quarterly rate with a higher usage fee.
Pausche highlighted the need for balance within the utility rate structure between base
charges and variable meter charges in order to generate revenues sufficient to cover
current operating expenses and repay the debt, noting more than half of the City's annual
costs for utility services is linked to the repayment of debt/MCES charges. Pausche said
when the tiered rates were implemented, the idea of a "per household" base fee made
sense because of the level of fixed costs related to the debt. Pausche said every household
pays a minimum $206 quarterly water bill, or approximately $70 a month, with a variable
component based on usage that is meant to encourage people to conserve water.
Pausche said there is some debate on whether the City should put these costs on the
property taxes, which would be deductible. Pausche said Mound is considered a fully
developed community and the population is not expected to fluctuate much in the coming
decades, so the City can't rely on growth to fund infrastructure investments, like other cities
may. Pausche said taxes based on property values do not necessarily bear any direct
relationship to the benefit of government goods and services received, and therefore, cities
typically charge utility rates in order to treat these services like commodities similar to
electric, gas, garbage and communication services instead of taxing. Shifting utility
operating and capital costs to the tax levy would shift more of the burden for utility services
and system capital improvement to higher value properties instead of sharing the burden
equally among all benefitting system users.
Pausche said it is the Council's challenge to determine what constitutes a fair system of
allocating the tax burden and that the City must balance how costs are distributed.
Mayor Wegscheid noted that the City continued the investments even with the tax capacity
fluctuations caused by the recession, so having fee-based utility bills insured a steady cash
flow, which is just another piece to consider.
Joleen Stadsklev, 4731 Manchester, questioned if the utility bill for 15K gallons is lower than
Delano's but there is a higher minimum, then there is no incentive to conserve. Stadsklev
-2511-
Mound City Council Minutes — August 22, 2017
said people who are using a lot of water get an advantage because they get a lower variable
rate.
Pausche addressed the question stating that there are seasonal people who leave town in
the winter who are still charged the minimum rate. Pausche said there are not that many
pools or sprinkler systems in Mound and smaller lot sizes, meaning the majority of
households use similar amounts of water, and therefore if the base fee was lowered the
variable rates would need to increase dramatically. Pausche said the City is ahead of the
curve regarding infrastructure improvements and she would expect the trends to look more
like Mound in the long term.
Mayor Wegscheid said that no plan is perfect and there is bound to be a downside for
someone.
Johann Chemin, 6039 Beachwood. Chemin noted that there are different rates for amount
of usage and he thinks there should be more tiers to encourage people to save water.
Mayor Wegscheid said that the Council will have a discussion at the upcoming workshop
and revisit the usage rates.
Council member Bergquist asked that with all the investments since the early 2000's, will
things get cheaper or lower. Pausche stated that investments will diminish after the last
street project in 2018, but that the City will need to consider other deferred needs that
haven't been addressed while the City concentrated on infrastructure and street
improvements. Pausche said Octobers workshop will focus on a comprehensive look at the
City's buildings, infrastructure, capital equipment, parks, etc., but that the rate of increase in
utility rates should definitely slow down.
Mayor Wegscheid noted this is kind of an exciting time as the City can look 10 years out
where previously the City had committed to all of these infrastructure projects and related
debt. The City now has the opportunity to look forward, plan better, and consider options on
how the City can pay for future improvements.
Council member Gillispie said that in her time on the Council, she has noticed that there
were never any 5-10 year plans, more year-to-year planning, but that the Council asked
Staff to plan ahead and she gave credit for them doing so.
Joleen Stadsklev asked about the upcoming workshop when further discussion will take
place. Mayor Wegscheid said the workshop is on Oct. 16, 2017 at 6:30 with the final budget
and levy approval on Dec. 12.
A. Action on Resolution Approving Changes to Debt Service Levy Schedules and to
appropriate funds in the debt service fund for Bond Series 20158 & 2016A
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Bergquist, to approve resolution. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
-2512-
Mound City Council Minutes — August 22, 2017
B. Action on Resolution Approving a Levy not to Exceed $218,404 for the Purpose of
Defraying the Cost of Operation, Pursuant to the Provisions of MSA 469, of the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for the City of Mound for the Year
2018
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Peterson, to approve resolution. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 17-125: RESOLUTION APPROVING A LEVY NOT TO EXCEED
$218,404 FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION,
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF MSA 469, OF THE HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF AND FOR THE CITY OF MOUND FOR THE YEA1
2018
C. Action on Resolution Approving the 2018 Preliminary General Fund Budget in the
amount of $5,614,463; Setting the Preliminary Levy at $5,704,456; and Approving
the Preliminary Overall Budget for 2018
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve resolution. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
01101101IMPIMV MMIC go] I Lei 0 F -1W 9:461TJ 10 leA I KWAII 1:2:111 N:11 IR I Jill 10 r -*1
PREI 11WAART LETT AT $5, IU4,456;
BUDGET
D. Mayor Wegscheid announcing: The 2018 Final Budget and Levy discussions and
decisions will take place at the Dec. 12, 2017 Regular Meeting, at 7:00 pm, in the
Council Chambers. Public comments will be taken at this meeting. Comments or
questions on the 2018 Budget and Levy can be Directed to the Finance Director at
952-472-0633.
7. City Manager and Director of Public Works Eric Hoversten presenting discussion and
recommendations of the Public Works Committee regarding removal of proposed
pathway/trail elements from 2018 Street and Utility Improvement Project.
City Manager Hoversten said that at the July 25 Council meeting, a public hearing was held
regarding the financing and construction of a project along the Westedge corridor that
included a recommendation to build a pedestrian and bicyclist pathway and trail into the
right-of-way. Hoversten said following the significant amount of public comments received,
a meeting of the Public Works Committee was convened that included Mayor Wegscheid,
Council Member Salazar, City Manager Eric Hoversten, and City Engineer Brian Simmons,
who discussed the trail in more detail and decided to recommend removal of the pathway
from the project based on the incompleteness of the bikeway element. Hoversten said Staff
would accept instructions from the Council to remove those elements from the plans and
edits would be made to the feasibility study which would then be brought back to the Council
as a consent item.
-2513-
Mound City Council Minutes — August 22, 2017
Motion by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to direct Staff to make edits to feasibility study to
remove pathway elements and to review trail components of the comprehensive plan for
2040. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
Johann Chemin, 6039 Beachwood came forward to ask how the Wilshire Blvd. reconstruction
was being assessed, saying he thinks it is unfair that people who live there have to pay as there
are trucks that use the road and ruin it. Chemin added the project benefits the whole city and
not just the people who live on it.
8. Conduct a closed session pursuant to the Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.05, subdivision
3(b) to engage in an attorney-client privileged discussion with the City's attorney regarding
the 4837 Bedford Road hazardous building matter currently being litigated.
Motion by Wegscheid, seconded by Salazar, to go into closed session to engage in an attorney-
client discussion with the City's attorney regarding the 4837 Bedford Road hazardous building
matter currently being litigated. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
ITIMIMPEff -TU
Motion by Wegscheid, seconded by Salazar, to reopen the meeting. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
9. Information/Miscellaneous
A. Comments/reports from Council Members
Hoversten reminded all of the following: State Fair - starts Aug. 24, Labor Day - Sept. 4 -
City offices closed, School starts - Sept. 5, Running of the Bays - Sept. 9
Last day to purchase trees for Tree Trust program is Sept. 1. Residents can purchase up to
two trees. Interested residents can order on the City's website. Pick-up for the trees is on
Sept. 16 at the Public Works lot, upper storage lot. Trees are 10 -gallon trees of about 1.5".
Residents' cost is $30 per tree.
B. Reports: Fire Department - July 2017
Liquor Store - July 2017
Finance Department - July 2017
C. Minutes: Planning Comm Minutes - July 18, 2017
D. Correspondence: CenterPoint Energy Rate Change Filing - August 8, 2017
10. Adjourn
MOTION by Gillispie, seconded by Bergquist, to adjourn at 8:10 p.m. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
-2514-
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
MEMO TO: Mayor Mark Wegscheid
City Council Members, Mound
Eric Hoversten, City Manager
FROM: Gregory S. Pederson, Mound Fire Chief
Safety Committee Chair, City of Mound
DATE: September 1, 2017
SUBJECT: Adoption of City of Mound Safety Program
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
Main: 952.472.3555
Fax: 952.472.3775
www.moundfire.com
The City of Mound Management Team is committed to doing all in its power to provide a safe
workplace for all employees. The City of Mound has a comprehensive Safety Program and an
active Safety Committee that is also committed to both employee and customer safety.
The Safety Program was updated in August 2017. It is understood that the Safety Program is
ever changing and updates to the program will occur as necessary to meet any new OSHA
Regulations and general safety program enhancements.
On behalf of all city employees and the City of Mound Safety Committee, I recommend that the
city council adopt the "The City of Mound Safety Program and Policy Statement". The adoption
and implementation of the Safety Program will make our city a safer place for all of our
employees and customers.
The Policy Statement should be signed and dated by the City Manager. Please contact me if you
have any specific questions regarding the adoption of City of Mound Safety Program.
Respectfully,
AM
Gregory derson
Mound Fire Chief, Safety Committee Chair
Attachment
-2515-
j:\admin\iso,nfpa,osha,nims - safety\safety program and committee\2017 city of mound safety program adoption memo,doc
0 11 0 9
1:44-4411PIR91000LAM '
Effiffim
2Zt0LCj MAI J, W-11 0 1 9j ;Lei 14 M&I-I 11 -ITA 94 J'I
WHEREAS, The City of Mound recognizes that it has the responsibility to provide a safe and
healthy work environment for its employees; and
WHEREAS, The City of Mound has established a Loss Control Management Program meeting
the requirements of the AWAIR Program (MN Statue 182.653); and
WHEREAS, The City of Mound has a comprehensive Safety Program and an active Safety
Committee committed to both employee and customer safety; and
WHEREAS, The City of Mound Safety Committee recommends the adoption of the City of
Mound Safety Program and Policy statement.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
hereby authorizes the adoption of the City of Mound Safety Program and Policy Statement as
shown in Exhibit A and made a part herein.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of September, 2017.
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Exhibit A Page 1 of 1
.... • .: � 1, ■ �;.. • � � ,
The City of Mound Management realizes it has the responsibility to provide safe workplaces for its employees
and safe environments for its citizens. All employees must pursue the highest standards in their assigned
activities and all City employees must recognize the wellbeing of persons and the protection of our physical
resources are as important as the activity and work being performed.
The City of Mound has established a Loss Control Management Program meeting the requirements of the
AWAIR Program (MN Statute 182.653). The City expects its Management, Supervisors, Department Heads
and employees to meet their assigned safest responsibilities, respond to all planned safety efforts, and
perform their assigned jobs in the safest possible manner.
The Safety Coordinator will be assigned the responsibility of implementing, organizing and maintaining the
overall Loss Control Management Program.
The Safety Coordinator will be our personal representative and will be responsible for the staff direction and
administration of our Safety Program. The Safety Coordinator will periodically report to the City Administrator
on the status of the Safety Program.
In addition, a Safety Committee has been created to investigate major losses, loss trends, assign Task Force
Committees and to conduct other assigned activities. This Committee is made up of a combination of
Management and employees (a representative from each major area in the City).
All Supervisors will be responsible for the safety and wellbeing of their workers as well as the repair and
maintenance of facilities and equipment in their area of responsibility. Supervisors and Department Heads will
investigate all accidents/injuries and loss trends. All reports related to this program will be directed to the
Safety Coordinator.
All City employees will complete their assigned tasks in a safe fashion based on the training they received, the
City safety rules, OSHA standards, good safety practices, and any other appropriate guidelines.
The City of Mound is committed to doing all in its power to make its Safety Program and Safety Committee a
success and expects all City employees to assist in this effort by contributing their expertise and following all
established rules and procedures.
The City of Mound recognizes its obligation to provide the safest possible working conditions for its
employees, a safe environment for its citizens, and to provide prompt first aid and medical care to minimize
personal injuries in the event of an accident. This requires a Safety Program whereby: (1) our employees will
be provided proper Personal Protective Equipment and job instruction; (2) their work practices will be
frequently reviewed; and (3) most importantly, their work performance will be evaluated.
The Safety Program will provide for the establishment of job safety training, minimum job safety requirements,
and investigation and reporting of accidents. Each Supervisor must implement and aggressively support our
Safety Program. All Supervisors and Department Heads will be responsible for the actions of their
employees. All employees will be expected to help and support the efforts of the Safety Coordinator, to follow
safe practices, and to obey all of the safety rules. We all must make every effort to reduce the burden of
accidents and injuries.
NOTE: Signed copy available to employee upon request through the Safety Coordinator.
ffMWAll questions about Safety Policies/ procedures should be 2517 -towards your Supervisor or the Safety Coordinator Greg Pederson.
MEMO TO: Mayor Mark Wegscheid
City Council Members, Mound
Eric Hoversten, City Manager
FROM: Gregory S. Pederson, Mound Fire Chief
DATE: September 1, 2017
SUBJECT: Adoption of 2015 Minnesota State Fire Code,
including appendix Chapter D
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
Main: 952.472.3555
Fax: 952.472.3775
www.moundfire.com
Internationally, fire code officials recognize the need for a modern, up-to-date fire code that
addresses conditions hazardous to life and property within their jurisdiction. The new 2015
Minnesota State Fire Code was adopted by the state on May 2, 2017. The new code is designed
to meet model code regulations that safeguard the public health and safety in all communities.
It is important to note that the 2015 Minnesota State Fire Code adopts and incorporates the
entire International Fire Code, 2012 Edition into the state code. The Minnesota State Fire Code
is also compatible with all of the other International Codes including the International Building
Code, International Mechanical Code, and International Plumbing Code. This compatibility
element eliminates code conflicts and helps generate a consistency in overall code compliance.
There are many benefits to adopting the current Minnesota State Fire Code. I recommend that
all cities served by the Mound Fire department adopt the state fire code as for public health and
safety reasons. Please contact me if you have any specific questions regarding the adoption of
the 2015 version of the Minnesota State Fire Code, including appendix Chapter D.
The adoption and implementation of this fire code will make our cities a safer place for all of our
current and future residents.
Respectfully,
A-
Greg S. Pederson
Mound Fire Chief
Attachments: Question & Answer Overview, 2015 State Fire Code 299F.011 Administration and
Enforcement, State Fire Code Appendix D -Fire Apparatus Access Roads
-2518-
iAfire code & inspection\inspection prevention\minnesota fire code\2015 minnesota state fire code\2015 minnesota state Fre code adoption memo.doc
2015
Minnesota i i Adoption
August1
Questions and Answers- Overview
Compiled by: Greg Pederson, Mound Fire Chief
What exactly is the Minnesota State Fire Code 2015? on May 2, 2017 the
Minnesota State Fire Code 2015 (MSFC 2015) was adopted and became effective
statewide. This MSFC 2015 includes the entire International Fire Code 2012 version
plus the Minnesota Fire Code committee amendments.
® Who and what does the Minnesota State Fire Code apply to? the 2015 Minnesota
State Fire Code shall be applicable throughout the State of Minnesota and in all
political subdivisions.
• Who administers and enforces the MSFC 2015? the commissioner shall adopt
rules and as may be necessary to administer and enforce the code rules in government
organizations, Minnesota state agencies, political subdivisions, and all local
governments.
Can local jurisdictions deviate from the MSFC 2015? Yes, but only if the code
rules and regulations are more restrictive than this code!
What are the local government rules? Any jurisdiction which adopts this code is
authorized to make amendments, by ordinance or regulation, to Chapter 1 of the
MSFC 2015 to provide a system for enforcement and administration within the
jurisdiction. These amendments shall be equal to, in addition to, or more stringent that
the MSFC 2015.
• .]Flow does the Minnesota State Fire Code 2015 affect existing sites and facilities?
The construction and design provisions of this code shall apply to:
1. Structures, facilities and conditions arising after the adoption of this code
2. Existing structures, facilities and conditions not legally in existence at the time of
code adoption
3. Existing structures, facilities and conditions when identified in specific sections
4. Existing structures, facilities and conditions which, in the opinion of the code
official, constitute a distinct hazard to life or property
is\fire code &inspection\inspection prevention\minnesota fire code\20, �,7„ pbia state fire code\minnesota state fire code 2015 adoption.doc - 1 -
® What is appendix Chapter D? Appendix Chapter D is a separate provision of the
MSFC 2015 that defines in more detail the augmented requirements necessary for
creating improved Fire Apparatus Access Roads I.e. better road widths. This
provision of the MCFC 2015 applies to new residential or commercial developments
(however it does not apply to existing roadways).
Should local jurisdictions officially adopt the MSFC 2015? Yes
Why? In the best of scenarios, each city should adopt the fire code on a local level
but it is not a legal necessity. Minn. Stat. 299 F.011 subdivision 4 makes the code
applicable statewide, including every city and jurisdiction. There are a several good
reasons to adopt the new MSFC 2015.
1. Minn. Stat. 299F.011, subdivision. 4 allow cities to adopt ordinances that are
more restrictive than the state fire code (as long as they do not exceed the state
building code). This can only happen if an ordinance is adopted by the
jurisdiction; you cannot do this by "policy" or "procedure". Examples of more
restrictive code requirements would be: hydrant spacing, fire lanes, burning
permits, barbecues on apartment balconies, etc. In short, if you wish to amend the
state fire code, you need to have an ordinance that adopts it and then amends it.
2. If your fire prevention and code enforcement relies on the issuance of citations
(i.e. criminal tickets), you will want to have a local ordinance. The state statutes
and rules dealing with the fire code do not give ticketing (citation) authority.
3. It simply makes things easier and stronger if you are challenged legally. Not only
is it a state requirement but it was also a municipal ordinance. It helps to remove a
legal challenge as to whether you or your staff has the authority to enforce the
state fire code.
4. The ordinance gives the city the latitude to address specific areas that in their
opinion could be considered dangerous and by requiring permits could be
regulated easier. Once again this list can be modified to meet a specific hazard or
safety requirement.
5. Each city or municipality has the right to create their own appeals board and
appeals process tailored to their ordinances or system.
Gsp 2017
Ofire code & inspection\inspection prevention\minnesota fire code\2bf7"ilfi,`„ieluia state fire code\minnesota state fire code 2015 adoption.doc - 2 -
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE 2015 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE
CODE, INCLUDING APPENDIX CHAPTER D
WHEREAS, The Mound Fire Chief and Mound Fire Prevention Division have made a
recommendation for the adoption of the 2015 Minnesota State Fire Code with Appendix D; and
WHEREAS, The Mound Fire Department provides fire protection, fire code enforcement, and
public safety services for the City of Mound; and
WHEREAS, The 2015 Minnesota State Fire Code is designed to meet model code regulations
that safeguard the public health and safety for all communities; and
WHEREAS, The City of Mound finds that such adoption is in the best interest of the City.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
hereby authorizes the adoption of the 2015 Minnesota State Fire Code, including appendix
Chapter D as shown in Exhibit A and made a part herein.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of September, 2017.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
-2521-
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
tl/ i SELECTED MINNESOTA FIRE PREVENTION STATUTES 12015 Minnesota Fire Code I IGC publicACCESS
Ercl_ibit A Page 1 of 4
man
ACCESS 2015 Minnesota Fire Code
SELECTED MINNESOTA
FIRE PREVENTION STATUTES
This material is copyrighted and reproduced with permission of the Revisor of Statutes for the state of Minnesota.
299F.011 STATE FIRE CODE; ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT.
Subdivision 1. MS 2006 [Renumbered 3268.02, subd 61
Subd. 2. [Repealed, 1981 c 106 s 16]
Subd. 3. Rules for code administration and enforcement.
The commissioner of public safety shall adopt rules as may be necessary to administer and enforce the code, specifically including but not limited to
rules for inspection of buildings and other structures covered by the code and conforming the code to the governmental organization of Minnesota state
agencies, political subdivisions and local governments.
Subd. 4. Applicability; local authority,
The State Fire Code shall be applicable throughout the state and in all political subdivisions and municipalities therein. However, nothing in this
subdivision shall prohibit a local unit of government otherwise authorized by law from adopting or enforcing any ordinance or regulation which specifies
requirements equal to, in addition to, or more stringent than the requirements of the State Fire Code. Any ordinance or regulation adopted by a local
unit which differs from the State Fire Code must be directly related to the safeguarding of life and property from the hazards of fire, must be uniform for
each class or kind of building covered, and may not exceed the applicable requirements of the State Building Code adopted pursuant to sections
326B.101 to 326B.151.
Subd. 4a. Day care home regulation.
(a) Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this section, the fire marshal shall not adopt or enforce a rule:
(1) establishing staff ratios, age distribution requirements, and limitations on the number of children in care;
(2) regulating the means of egress from family or group family day care homes in addition to the egress rules that apply to the home as a single
family dwelling; or
(3) confining family or group family day care home activities to the floor of exit discharge.
(b) For purposes of this subdivision, "family or group family day care home" means a dwelling unit in which the day care provider provides the
services referred to in Section 245A.02, subdivision 10, to one or more persons.
(c) Nothing in this subdivision prohibits the Department of Human Services from adopting or enforcing rules regulating day care, including the
subjects in paragraph (a), clauses (1) and (3). The department may not, however, adopt or enforce a rule stricter than paragraph (a), clause (2).
(d) The Department of Human Services may by rule adopt procedures for requesting the state fire marshal or a local fire marshal to conduct an
inspection of day care homes to ensure compliance with state or local fire codes.
(e) The commissioners of public safety and human services may enter into an agreement for the commissioner of human services to perform follow-
up inspections of programs, subject to licensure under chapter 245A, to determine whether certain violations cited by the state fire marshal have
been corrected. The agreement shall identify specific items the commissioner of human services is permitted to inspect. The list of items is not
subject to rulemaking and may be changed by mutual agreement between the state fire marshal and the commissioner. The agreement shall
provide for training of individuals who will conduct follow-up inspections. The agreement shall contain procedures for the commissioner of human
services to follow when the commissioner requires assistance from the state fire marshal to carry out the duties of the agreement.
(f) No tort liability is transferred to the commissioner of human services as a result of the commissioner of human services performing activities
within the limits of the agreement.
Subd. 4b. Stairway.
The State Fire Code shall not require stairways of existing multiple dwelling buildings of two stories or less to be enclosed. For the purposes of this
subdivision the term "stories" has the meaning given it in the State Building Code.
Subd. 4c. [Repealed, 2005 c 136 art 9 s 15)
Subd. 5. Appeal policy; variance.
Upon application, the state fire marshal may grant variances from the minimum requirements specified in the code if there is substantial compliance with
the provisions of the code, the safety of the public and occupants of such building will not be jeopardized, and undue hardship will result to the applicant
unless such variance is granted. No appeal to the state fire marshal for a variance from orders issued by a local fire official from the State Fire Code
shall be accepted until the applicant has first made application to the local governing body and the local unit has acted on the application. The state fire
marshal shall consider any decisions or recommendations of the local governing body. Any person aggrieved by a decision made by the fire marshal
under this subdivision may proceed before the fire marshal as with a contested case in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act,
Subd. 5a. Local board of appeal.
Local governing bodies may appoint boards of appeal to hear and rule on appeals from orders issued under the fire code. An appeal from a local board
of appeal may be made to the local governing body. If a board of appeal is not appointed, the appeals of orders must be made directly to the governing
body. Local boards of appeal and governing bodies are not liable for damages in connection with granting variances, abatements, denials, or
modifications of orders from the fire code that are made in good faith.
Subd. 5b. Variance considerations.
When considering appeals for variances from the fire code, the local appeal board or governing body, the state fire marshal, a state administrative law
judge, and a court shall take into consideration the benefit to be obtained by complying with the fire marshal's orders and the effect on affordable
housing, provided that the spirit of the code is complied with and public safety secured.
-2522-
https://codes.iccsafe.org/public/document/code/451/8083821 1/4
9/1/2017 APPENDIX D FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS 12015 Minnesota Fire Code I ICC pubiicACCESS
Exhibit A Page 2 of 4
publicACCESS 2015 Minnesota Fire Code
APPENDIX D
FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS
The provisions contained /n this appendix are not mandatory unless specifically referenced In the adopting ordinance.
SECTION D101
GENERAL
D101.1 Scope.
Fire apparatus access roads shall be in accordance with this appendix and all other applicable requirements of the International Fire Code,
SECTION D102
REQUIRED ACCESS
D102.1 Access and loading.
Facilities, buildings or portions of buildings hereafter constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of an approved fire apparatus
access road with an asphalt, concrete or other approved driving surface capable of supporting the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing at least
75,000 pounds (34 050 kg).
SECTION D103
MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS
D103.1 Access road width with a hydrant.
Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus access road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet (7925 mm), exclusive of shoulders (see Figure
D103.1).
For Si: 1 foot = 304.8 mm.
96.
- R
2b'
-26'
..
26'
R
TYP. ' 20'
26'
= 20
96 -FOOT DIAMETER 60 -FOOT "Y" MINIMUM CLEARANCE
CUL-DE-SAC AROUND A FIRE
HYDRANT
60,
I�
20'. _!
28' R
TYP.
26'
120 -FOOT HAMMERHEAD
28' R- ,
TYR '
701 -
MY -
20'
ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE
TO 120 -FOOT HAMMERHEAD
FIGURE D103.1
DEAD-END FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD TURNAROUND
D103.2 Grade.
Fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 10 percent in grade.
Exception: Grades steeper than 10 percent as approved by the fire chief.
D103.3 Turning radius.
The minimum turning radius shall be determined by the fire code official.
D103.4 Dead ends.
Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet (45 720 mm) shall be provided with width and turnaround provisions in accordance with
Table D103.4.
TABLE D103.4
REQUIREMENTS FOR DEAD-END
FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS
LENGTH
(feet)
WIDTH
(feet)
TURNAROUNDS REQUIRED
0-150
20
None required
151-500
20
120 -foot Hammerhead, 60 -foot "Y" or 96 -foot diameter cul-de-sac in accordance with Figure D103.1
501-750
26
120 -foot Hammerhead, 60 -foot "Y" or 96 -foot diameter cul-de-sac in accordance with Figure D103.1
Over 750
Special approval required
or SI: 1 foot= 304.8 mm.
D103.5 Fire apparatus access road gates.
Gates securing the fire apparatus access roads shall comply with al_ 2523 wing criteria:
https://codes.iccsafe.org/public/document/code/451/8102009 1/3
9/1/2017 APPENDIX D FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS ( 2015 Minnesota Fire Code I ICC pubiicACCESS
Exhibit A Page 3 of 4
1. The minimum gate width shall be 20 feet (6096 mm).
2. Gates shall be of the swinging or sliding type.
3. Construction of gates shall be of materials that allow manual operation by one person.
4. Gate components shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times and replaced or repaired when defective.
S. Electric gates shall be equipped with a means of opening the gate by fire department personnel for emergency access. Emergency opening
devices shall be approved by the fire code official.
6. Manual opening gates shall not be locked with a padlock or chain and padlock unless they are capable of being opened by means of forcible
entry tools or when a key box containing the key(s) to the lock is installed at the gate location.
7. Locking device specifications shall be submitted for approval by the fire code official.
8. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in accordance with JUL 325.
9. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of LU_M F2200.
D103.6 Signs.
Where required by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be marked with permanent NO PARKING—FIRE LANE signs complying with
Figure D103.6. Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 Inches (305 mm) wide by 18 inches (457 mm) high and have red letters on a white
reflective background. Signs shall be posted on one or both sides of the fire apparatus road as required by Section D103.6.1 or D103.6.2.
SIGN TYPE -A' SIGN TYPE'C" SIGN TYPE `U'
NO NO NO
PARKING [FIRE
ARKING PARKING
1$"
FIRE LANE LANE FIRE LANE
12---.�
FIGURE D103.6
FIRE LANE SIGNS
D103.6.1 Roads 20 to 26 feet in width.
Fire lane signs as specified in Section D103.6 shall be posted on both sides of fire apparatus access roads that are 20 to 26 feet wide (6096 to 7925
mm).
D103.6.2 Roads more than 26 feet in width.
Fire lane signs as specified in Section D103.6 shall be posted on one side of fire apparatus access roads more than 26 feet wide (7925 mm) and
less than 32 feet wide (9754 mm).
SECTION D104
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS
D104.1 Buildings exceeding three stories or 30 feet In height.
Buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144 mm) or three stories in height shall have at least two means of fire apparatus access for each structure.
D104.2 Buildings exceeding 62,000 square feet in area.
Buildings or facilities having a gross building area of more than 62,000 square feet (5760 m2) shall be provided with two separate and approved fire
apparatus access roads.
Exception: Projects having a gross building area of up to 124,000 square feet (11 520 m2) that have a single approved fire apparatus access road when
all buildings are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler systems.
D104.3 Remoteness.
Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum
overall diagonal dimension of the lot or area to be served, measured In a straight line between accesses.
SECTION D105
AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS
D105.1 Where required.
Where the vertical distance between the grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet (9144 mm), approved aerial fire apparatus access
roads shall be provided. For purposes of this section, the highest roof surface shall be determined by measurement to the eave of a pitched roof, the
intersection of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater.
D105.2 Width.
Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet (7925 mm), exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of
the building or portion thereof.
D105.3 Proximity to building.
At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet (4572 mm) and a maximum of 30 feet
(9144 mm) from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the aerial fire
apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official.
D105.4 Obstructions.
Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and the
building. Other obstructions shall be permitted to be placed with the approval of the fire code official.
SECTION D106
MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS
-2524-
https://codes.iccsafe.org/public/documenVcode/451/8102009 2/3
V1 114V 1, r-UrravuiA u r1KC At'NAKA t U5 AUUL55 KUAUS I ZU15 Minnesota Fire Uode I 1UU pubiicAUL;i=SS
D106.1 Projects having more than 100 dwelling units. Exhibit A Page 4 of
Multiple -family residential projects having more than 100 dwelling units shall be equipped throughout with two separate and approved fire apparatus
access roads.
Exception: Projects having up to 200 dwelling units may have a single approved fire apparatus access road when all buildings, including nonresidential
occupancies, are equipped throughout with approved automatic sprinkler systems installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2.
D106.2 Projects having more than 200 dwelling units.
Multiple -family residential projects having more than 200 dwelling units shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads
regardless of whether they are equipped with an approved automatic sprinkler system.
SECTION D107
ONE- OR TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENTS
D107.1 One- or two-family dwelling residential developments.
Developments of one- or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire
apparatus access roads, and shall meet the requirements of Section D104.3.
Exceptions:
1. Where there are more than 30 dwelling units on a single public or private fire apparatus access road and all dwelling units are equipped
throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 , 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3 of the International Fire
Code, access from two directions shall not be required.
2. The number of dwelling units on a single fire apparatus access road shall not be increased unless fire apparatus access roads will connect
with future development, as determined by the fire code official.
D108
REFERENCED STANDARDS
ASTM F2200-05 Standard Specification for
Automated Vehicular Gate
Construction
ICAC IFC -12 International Fire Code
UL 325-02 Door, Drapery, Gate, Louver,
and Window Operators and
Systems, with Revisions
through February 2006
-2525-
D103.5
D101.5,
D107.1
D103.5
hftps://codes.iccsafe.org/public/document/code/451/8102009 3/3
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound,.
C01MMU irtyDeveloprnentDe
0.0
Memorandum
Honorable Mayor Wegscheid and Members of the Mound City Council
From: Field Officer Stewart B. Simon ' 'S
Date: September 7, 2017
Consent Agenda Item .E — Accessory Structure/Garage with Apartment
Re.- Alteration/Modification Project -6199 Sinclair Road (PID No. 23-997-24-34-0072)
The City Council will consider a request from applicant/property owner Debra Charpentier,
pursuant to City Code Section 129-35 (b) (5) to allow alterations/modifications to the existing,
nonconforming accessory structure/garage with apartment at 6199 Sinclair Road which
include, but are not limited to, foundation repairs, interior remodeling of the apartment unit to
bring into compliance with current fire codes, and cosmetic improvements to the exterior of the
structure.
The applicant is proposing to raise the existing foundation of the structure by approximately
two (2) feet to resolve issues with water run-off. Staff has determined a minor expansion
permit, which can be approved administratively, will be required to raise the foundation. The
need for an expansion permit is due to the expansion of the following non -conforming setback:
® Side yard setback (east side) of 1.4 feet (4 feet required)
Details regarding the proposed improvements are contained in the applicant's submitted
materials and plans for the project, which shows the existing conditions and proposed
conditions of the apartment unit. According to information provided by the applicant, the
apartment unit above the garage has been continuously occupied for at least the last seven (7)
years. Although the layout of the garage and apartment will not change, cosmetic
improvements are included in the scope of this project to make the structure more secure,
livable, and energy efficient.
City Code Sec. 129-35 (b) (5) includes the regulations related to alterations to non -conforming
uses. The excerpts are provided below:
Sec. 129-35 Nonconforming uses.
(5) With the approval of the City Council, alterations may be made to a building
containing nonconforming residential units when they will improve the livability thereof,
provided they will not increase the number of dwelling units or result in the expansion,
enlargement or intensification of the use.
.7 M -
Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes §15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve
or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with
state rules. Minnesota State Statute §645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1"
for the purposes of application of the 60 -day rule. The "Day V was determined to be August
18, 2017 for this request.
SITE INFORMATION.
The property at 6199 Sinclair Road is a comer lot, with improved frontage on Sinclair Road and
Westedge Boulevard (CSAR 44) and includes frontage on Lake Minnetonka on its south side.
The property currently has a single-family dwelling and an existing detached garage with a one -
bedroom apartment unit on the second level. Based on information provided by the applicant,
the apartment unit has been in continuous use with running water, heat, and electricity since it
was constructed. Additionally, the apartment unit has been occupied as a rental for the last
seven (7) years. Staffs review is the detached accessory structure/garage with apartment is a
lawful, nonconforming use. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing single-family
dwelling, rebuild a new single-family dwelling, and make improvements to the detached
accessory structure/garage with apartment unit. The proposed garage/apartment project
include, but not limited to, repairing and raising the foundation of the structure by approximately
two (2) feet to resolve drainage issues, updating the structure to meet current fire and plumbing
codes, and other remodeling activities to improve the livability of the existing structure. Upon
completion of the project, the structure will remain in use as a detached garage, with a one -
bedroom apartment unit on the second level.
Staff has determined a minor expansion permit, which can be approved administratively, will be
required to raise the foundation due to the existing structure being setback 1.4 feet off the
eastern side yard; per City Code, lakefront properties require a 4 -foot side yard setback for a
detached accessory structure with doors opening to the street, when the accessory structure is
constructed in the front yard.
Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to involved City departments,
consultants, and public agencies for review and comment. Council is advised that some
comments received during review have been addressed, and are therefore not included in this
report.
® As there are building and fire code regulations applicable to structures within certain
distances of property lines, the applicant is requested to contact the Building Official to
discuss these regulations including, but not limited to, fire rated walls, limitations to
walls/openings, egress requirements, and specific information that may be needed
upon the submission of a building permit application (such as professional engineering
report, etc.).
The City Code does not require review of this request by the Planning Commission.
However, the City Council, at its option, may remand this request to the Planning
Commission prior to action, if it feels Planning Commission review would be beneficial.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Staff recommends the City Council authorize the proposed alterations/modifications to the
existing detached accessory structure/garage with apartment at 6199 Sinclair Road, by
adopting the attached resolution, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the City's
review of this request.
2. No future approval of any building permits is included as part of this action.
3. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit
application.
4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency
permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to
building permit issuance.
5. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining permission from abutting property
owner(s) for access on to their property for the purpose of undertaking the proposed
project.
In recommending approval, Staff offers the following findings of fact:
1. The existing detached accessory structure/garage with apartment is a lawful, non-
conforming use. The proposed alteration activities do not expand current conditions
and will improve the livability of the existing structure.
2. The project will bring the existing structure into compliance with current fire codes.
3. The project will improve issues related to storm water run-off.
4. The project improves aesthetics of the existing structure as viewed from Sinclair Road,
Westedge Boulevard (CSAR 44), and abutting properties.
Staff is in attendance of this meeting to answer any questions related to this request.
3-2528-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLITION APPROVING DETACHED ACCESSORY- -.
PROJECTAPARTMENT ROAD
PID • 23-117-24-34-0072
WHEREAS, Debra Charpentier, owner of the property located at 6199 Sinclair Road, in
accordance with City Code Section 129-35 (b) (5), request the City Council to authorize
alterations/modifications to an existing detached accessory structure/garage with apartment
(herein "Accessory Structure") on the property; and
WHEREAS, the Accessory Structure is a lawful, non -conforming use, which has been in
continuous use by past and current owners; and
WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-35 (b) (5) reads as follows:
Sec. 929-35 Nonconforming uses.
(5) With the approval of the City Council, alterations may be made to a building
containing nonconforming residential units when they will improve the livability thereof,
provided they will not increase the number of dwelling units or result in the expansion,
enlargement or intensification of the use.
E'j
WHEREAS, the proposed improvements to the Accessory Structure include, but are not limited
to, repairing and raising the foundation to resolve drainage issues, updates to meet current fire
and building codes, interior remodeling activities, and exterior improvements. Details regarding
the request are contained in the Planning Report dated September 7, 2017 and the
accompanying materials and project plans that were submitted by the applicant; and
WHEREAS, the request was reviewed by the City Council at its September 12, 2017 meeting;
and
WHEREAS, in granting approval of the Accessory Structure alteration/modification project, the
City Council makes the following findings of fact:
The existing detached accessory structure/garage with apartment is a lawful, non-
conforming use. The proposed alteration/modification activities no not expand current
conditions and will improve the livability of the existing structure.
2. The project will bring the existing structure into compliance with current fire codes.
3. The project will improve issues related to the drainage of storm water run-off on the
property.
-2529-
Exhibit A
Lot 7, Block 17 "THE HIGHLANDS", according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
(Abstract Property)
-2530-
August 21, 2017
To:
Applicant
Re:
Location:
Honorable Mayor and City Council of Mound
Debra Cha rpentier —Property owner
J
Garage and Apartment Alteration/Modification Project —Applicant Narrative
6199 Sinclair Rd Mound, MN 55364
Dear Council Members:
I am requesting your approval to allow for alterations/modifications to the existing, lawful /non-
conforming garage and apartment located at 6199 Sinclair Rd. The property has been in continuous use
with running water, heat and electricity and has been occupied since constructed.
The purpose for this request is to allow for improvements to the structure and dwelling as follows:
1. To make the property more secure
2. To update to today's fire code regulations
3. To allow for water run off away from the structure
4. To make the property more aesthetically pleasing
5. To make the property more livable and energy efficient
I have received a letter from Sarah Smith, Community Development Director dated May 10, 2017 noting
that "the use is deemed to be lawful, nonconforming".
I have had several meetings with Scott Qualle-MNSPECT and based on our conversations, l don't see any
obstacles to permit issuance.
I am providing the existing site survey and proposed house plan survey as prepared by Carlson McCain
which provides the location and dimensions of the existing structure and proposed structure.
I am providing plans for the updated dwelling.
My intent is to improve the property in all aspects which is in the best interest of the neighborhood and
community.
I respectfully ask for your approval today to move forward with this request.
Regards,
Debra Charpentier
Q�
-2531-
Charpentier Garage and Existing Dwelling
6199 Sinclair Rd.
Mound, MN 55364
Re: Request to City Council of Mound
1. Repair foundation walls; Tuck pointing, Core filling
2. Raise foundation 16" to allow water to run away from the garage
3. Re -pour concrete floor in garage
4. Replace garage doors
S. Upgrade dwelling with fire code regulation material bringing to code and making it much safer
than it was previously
6. Improve the overall aesthetic of the garage and dwelling as viewed from Sinclair Rd and the
other three sides while maintaining the original footprint of the structure
i. Cosmetic updates and improvements of the efficiency of all building systems are proposed for
the existing garage and dwelling including; new roof, new siding, new flooring, insulation,
windows, lighting, appliances, plumbing, HVAC etc ... are planned.
8. The project will not increase the number of dwelling units or result in expansion, enlargement or
intensification of use
9. The dwelling has been in continuous use with running water, heat and electricity since it was
constructed and has been occupied
-2532-
-2533-
101
2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD > MOUND, MN 55364-1668 ° PH: 952-472-0600 - FAX: 952-472-0620 a WW .CET OFMOUND.COM
To: Debra Charpentier
From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Date: May 10, 2017
Re: 6199 Sinclair Road
With regard to your inquiry about the property at 6199 Sinclair Road in Mound,
MN, Staff respectfully offers the following information:
The present zoning regulations do not allow for residential
occupancy/use of a detached accessory garage structure. There is
historical information in the property file that mentions the location of
a house and garage on the property including information regarding
apartment/residential use of the upper floor of the detached garage.
2. City Code Sec. 129-35 (b) includes the regulations for nonconforming
uses. Please see below excerpts:
(b) Nonconforming uses.
1) Any use lawfully existing upon the effective date of the ordinance from which
this chapter is derived may be continued at the size and in a manner of
operation existing upon such date, but may be expanded or intensified only in
compliance with the provisions of this section. This paragraph shall not be
deemed to prevent the expansion, enlargement or intensification of a
nonconforming use if the use is allowed as a conditional use and the landowner
obtains a expansion permit allowing such expansion, enlargement or
intensification
(2) When any nonconforming use of any structure or land in any district has
been changed to a conforming use, and has been so used for more than 12
months, it shall not thereafter revert to its prior nonconforming use.
-2534-
3) Whenever a nonconforming use of a structure or land is discontinued for a
period of more than 12 months, any future use of said structure or land shall be
in conformity with the provisions of this chapter.
(4) A nonconforming use of a structure or parcel of land may be changed to a
similar nonconforming use or to a more restrictive nonconforming use (as
determined by the City Council). Some nonconforming uses are permitted by
conditional use permits. Once a structure or parcel of land has been placed in
similar nonconforming use or in a more restrictive nonconforming use, and has
been so used for a period of more than 12 months, it shall not return to
the prior nonconforming use.
(5) With the approval of the City Council, alterations may be made to a building
containing nonconforming residential units when they will improve the livability
thereof, provided they will not increase the number of dwelling units or result in
the expansion, enlargement or intensification of the use.
You provided information that the apartment/residential unit on the upper level of the
existing garage has been rented and used for the past seven (7) years. Based on the
information contained in the property file at the City of Mound and on the assumption
that there has not been a discontinuation of the use of the apartment/residential unit
on the upper level of the existing garage for a period more than 12 months, my
determination, as Community Development Director for the City of Mound, is that the
use is deemed to be lawful, nonconforming.
If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me by telephone (952)
472-0604 or by email at Sarahsmith@cityofmound.com.
-2535-
6555 County Road 26
Mound, MN 55364
763.479.6488
cell: 612.910.4972
PAGE OF PAGES
-PROPOSAL i
IPROIOSALSTED TO:
�/_
DATE-
TR
S STRE T / 7
ZT"/ r
JOB NAME.
CITY, S TA T�#IP:
JOB LOCATION:
ARCHITECT.
DATE OFPLANS:
JOB PHONE:
PAYMENT
WE HEREBY SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR THE FOLLOWING:
L�" Q r k
s�tS• cf'1161
q
I �_ AP -w work
I PAYMENT
WE HEREBY PROPOSE TO FURNISH LABOR AND MATERIALS COMPLETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ABOVE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SUM OF:
- DOLLARS $
WITH PAYMENT AS FOLLOWS luija'.1211 &Awce. Oj"L G, ml_'VIQ�iao
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
[ACCEPTANCE
THE ABOVE PROPOSED PRICES, SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY AND HEREBYACCEPTED. YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO COMPLETE THIS WORKA S SPECIFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE
MADEAS INDICATED ABOVE.
-2536-
DATEACCEPTED
SIGNATURE
SIGNATURE
EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY
oS r
LOT 7, BLOCK 17,
THE HIGHLANDS,
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
I To - - - - - - - DEBRA CIIARPENTIER
B]St
iMMM����
i i II
r � � I Garage Floor -935.1
Lij 6195 Sincloir Rood \
1�����,
p X + ; \ B4>t
Existing House 2 \
L oun
' I "' \ Top of Fticilon-950.] a \ \ a] •• \ \
I\ {� -�L_ `\ I \ \ x9Je.> xBJ8.6 \ \,•.\ \ \
eR.re
x
\ \ V,
A \
A. \
ri. M. a xeo Ria.+, wri=m•\}-- \ ` 95.3 .. ✓ ^ \•'••
�_
53.4 moo ...�i..� ai s V A absl a `--.�5 Tom\ \' \ \ v
Not%15'58"E ��
Ir -A f2t8.6 E tLl- tLl�_BQ�n,
Rak R lornxs ,1151-r o\� ,� I.x ` \ \ / NIGH
LAN 5 ( num ( \ -, 9]65
-`
I M 5 \.. S.J 19728 _ %� � \,••\
�x 9 950E 1 m' xi /3.J r f� / (RLS 91N) \ ' 9311 •, ` t
49> l ) I{\'•• e4o \ x 121 6
• I �Y� 9] 9]15 �•'�
q _ el
D; 3i 1 - \ mg Garage i I a i ,� rl
I P ' -,woe \••, \ `\
/ O Exist
/ m e -8 nerorrw�-9.nuaee �' P I i I 4' avis Y ' w e eemnma �
mer �� . �� 9]91\• •A �`�
C.1 • £ a' / I Ia4.J I I 9 ( I Existing House�/ �t n r f -I x 94R.D `\ •.\ a xofi / { x 939.8 8 ' { / L^L`O./.� • \ \\�\\ \ \ �'' ��
�r Flwr
t
,,,, J_� / I" iJa 1 z 941m _ I /� I V +��. O S' �' Je \''•. \ 5 \ 4X Y,�.
3166% r 4
L-
I4 L. �•3 i �'�' ' \ �� \ \ J 159
•I v I. I I • O m / / ,4'�I \ h' •\aSi\\� ������
..--.- -'� � ` i ' � o / I � "'•• \sept° c�
re]a..x
�
��, v',�v 0�
9]B. • 6]94 ��
060 0\�
o>.
� esa]
;�• � beam Paw„
�'
` ou i lP 30.> lest Co r rPoerty IMe / I I I I Ykp6 R tahg Walt/ }� \ �, •• \\
i<;0.87
\ '• \ I \ \ \'• \ \
'�]=4 \ �- �\�\�\� \ \ \ Ali 89, e�9, I \ \ �•.,\ \
�A \ x.31>\ �-„-x-'-`--'-'-•-•-' - ��
-West lin of Lot 7, Block f23�• \ \ \ \ 777
\ •,\ \
�� iJ, THE HIGHLANDS (as $DZ%3•i W \ \ \ �Ye dnk ayeelnr\ a •,\ \ _
c�P'bos \ ` \\ \ \\IT"\ t\�\�\��\��� menYmenfetl) \ \ \ \ ef`r al� �+]s4 •.� � \\ \ � '�-_•_ '$\\
>h yC i
-3y4�.�c \ \ \ \ \\1 Shedg / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1' \\;• ` 'te ` \ \ •':\A\
98 \ \ \ >q+1.] '' \ \\ x9]4A \ \ •.•,\ \
1 \»�\� a>.
�
xIBj 9.1���\0 \\ \] \ \ \ \ \fix b \\eP�•\ \\ \� � \ •':\\\ \\
94].6
� R� 'E'�,� ,� ` .iJ �? �_ .`� � ` � r I I I � d9a 0octauord ����\\�����\\\ �•. � \ \ \ \ x 9Jaa \ \ +\
w� f °fO{L{'x' > (•�� 3` d� �\ tet warm Hpi1sE \
1Z.0
�\ LEGEND wv`
® - Denotes Found Iron Monument
\1 O - Denotes Sanitary Manhole
1( -Denotes Existing Tree
Denotes Get. Valve
Denotes Utility Pole
o - Denotes Mail Be.
- Denotes Guy Wire Z 11AR47 &ENO47P
- O1• - - Denotes Overhead Electric Lot 7, Block 17, THE HIGHLANDS, --ding to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
-»- - Denoi.s StoRn Sewer 0 5 /0 20 (Abstract Property)
CALL Bg-gE y� DX. ® - _ - - Denotes Existing Fence as noted (Ab,t,,, No7ES
® - Denotes Landscaped Area ( SCALE IN FEET) 1. The field work for this sully was completed on June 1011, 2017.
° - Denotes Concrete Surface 2. Bearings shown hereon are ossumed.
Total P 1 A tit 155 s, it.
£xistrng G-." - 3600 D. 3. BENCHMARK TNH of the mlersec lion of Commerce Boulevard end Grandview Boulevard.
Denotes Bituminoue Surface Exlsting 0 y Ale. to ROW Line 3828 q./f, Elevation 958 34 feet (NGMD 29)
b{, ExfsWg He Ik 1388 q.ff. 4. Surveyed propert do,,,, - 6199 Snciar Road, Mound, MN, 55364.
Know what's below. / - Denotes Existing T Ft. Contour Exrsung H f n4, gift' n
C�•+ Existing D k 3340 5. Existing B Id'nge on the surveyed propert dmeneroned as shown
all before you dig. Mac E ting R } g Wo11e, Polos. St Irs (Eshmote) 1500 q rt. y'
Denotes Existing 5 Ft. Contour T tel Imp A -- 33,699 ,q ft. 6. No Titl C I+ rnsnt was plovidsd for this survey, subiset to oil easements of record, IT any,
Tetei Imp woes Percentage 333"
crnnR7srnae
I hereby certfy to Debra Cl.,psniier that this survey, plan or report was prepared
by me e, under my tlrset sup -i-, and that I om a duly licensed lend survey.,
under Ne laws of the Stole of Mnnesoto
Oated this 16th day of August. 20°7,
Signed: Cod... M,Coln, Inc.
By
A. Bon ar
M eesota License No 457]5
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
of �
LOT 7, BLOCK 17,
THE HIGHLANDS,
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
r
�aY
DEBRA CHARPENTIER
MWIn
I t I I vs,
I jcJ'3 150 ( i
Exsting G
( jE °rage
Garage Floor=935.1
G' I o5
942, K 6195 Gincialr Rood
�( •j I ( jj �\ '� x0072 K Existing House
Top of Founictic 950.7
!eL
0". • .,..., _` . 1 9 .6 , 1 \ u. �- y,, (�.,.- me -_ s
Ifix' 46 ea
_ L Rork pe otnng Wal -+l \ �o`a� a • TW 94 .0 /
O BW 94 .5 \ l f". 9sux3°I
�, O 94 .0 T\
I( � w n` , W 94 5 f _
11�
/ O 5 x I Ews,'ng'e
/Proposed Gorage
/ 9J] a Gao9e (loo v P
'S Pfle.alrvn-8155 k.l 19 P
,7
944. l .( I
jI �• 1� BW' 942, l I
rn s's I I
rA- t ewe s 1 A
u. _.� \�`\�C i 91�x •I 6'J
IP dd� l
Pmr)
Existing
1.
A 0
LEGEND PROPOSED GARAGE ELEVATION
� - Denotes Faard ken Monument � - Denotes Landscaped Areo Geroge Floor Elewtbn: 935.5
O - Denotes Sanitary Manhole _Denotes Concrete Surface PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVA77ONS
LLJ\\ - Denotes Existing Tree Lowest Roor ElswGon: 813.5
- C^noles Bituminous Surface Top of Found.0- Osrotlon: 9522
oa -Denotes Gate Valve
Denotes Utility Pole - Denotes Proposed Concrete
,'uta Pm -cel Areo tn,rs5 s711
- Denotes Mail Box Exms mg Gara9 -' - ±600 sq. ft.
/ -ah - Denotes Existing 1 Ft. Contour Exla irg Drivew y A f ROW L- 1828 eq, rt.
Is
-Denotes Curb Stop v Proposed Drive y E p mn ±426 sq.ft.
Proposed Patl (Behind Com s) ±120 sq.11.
Z -Denotes Guy Wire - Denofes Existing 5 Ft. Contour Proposed House - - -.-- f1,3s6 aq. rt.
�-/ Propased Deck (3 S aeon Porch Below) 3432 aaft.
re• - - Denotes Overhead Electric Proposed House Stoop 372 sq. n,
-Denotes Storm Sewerx - Denotes Proposed Spot Elevation Existing Sid ew ik 31sT
Proposed Sid< Ik --- - 180
% I - • - - - Denotes Proposed Contour PoposedRelg W l+ (Est -1e) 0 sa.n
Donate. Total impero A 34,417
-ff.
( SCa LE IN FEET) - Denotes Proposed Retaining Wail o • a • o • o • -Denotes Proposed Silt Fence Total I•npnnaus Pw tentage - tis 6a
T
5\
NO2%6'58"E 9so' -"`\ b P�.�� "ea'xr „y1 l I I ( ','� I I -� --,-�\ ' \ \i\\ \
East line of Lot k 17
360
TIBW9438W942.
Proposed Houseit Poured Basement
Walkout
..
BW 947.0
380
ei e'
l�
I�-West Ine of Lot 7,•Biockx ' t23C
17, THE HIGHLANDS (as S02'13'1
,anumented)
\•>'2A
9- 9\
Ap
BW 942,0
T 9430 h• \ \\\+/ I\\ .°Ply.\ \ \
BW 420 a4- i, 1\
TW945.5
W 94 0\ ^', 1 x `;'� �s^�. +' \•' \\ \ $ ���
B ,•\
TI %t
7W 943.
940 • `t / �I' f. ""` I \ '7%' :\oo/\\y1���
�.�•" ` BW 2.0 1 •
TW 943.0 °
BW 9 250 A
/ / �\ \ •\\
\ • / o/ °o o\ ••\� b \
140.0 / , 1• I ' � \ Mbe Retohl^g i k \ A'+� \•'• \�\
949.9 , \ \ \ % q+2.3 \ \ \.• � � \ \\ x 9]4.4 \ \ � •'.\� \\
-4,'�
9329
\ \•. � � � \ \ x 9]4.3 \ � *�
PARC42 Ot3'CRIP)7OV,
Lot 7Block 17. ME HIGHLANDS, according to the recorded plot thereof, Hennepin County,
N'rt•nesa:a
(Abstract Property)
6ENkWAL N07£S-
1. The Heid work far this survey was completed on August 14, 2017.
2. Sealing. shown hereon are ossvmetl.
3. BENCHMARK: TNH of the intersection of Commerce Boulevard and Grandview Boulev dr
Elevation=958.34 feet (NGV) 29)
4. Surveyed property address - 6199 S'nclor Read, Mound MN, 55364
S. No Title Cammdment was provided for the survey, subject to oil easements o1 record,
if any
CER77f7CA77aV..
I hereby certify to Debra Chorpaetler that this survey, plan or report was
prepared
byde a the laws of the r5toteosat upf .,Minnesota that 19m ° duly 1 tensed land surveyor
Dated the 16th day of August 2017
1
P
W
U)
U.
O
W
Q
H
W
W
U
9v0
m
W
a
REVISIONS
I.
3.
a.i
J
5.
6.
DRAWN BY: 8,S/lA6
ISSUE DATE: 6/16/17
FILE N0: 1499
2-2538
Cd!
1"J, WQIfm frMlit-W-M1�1TATI 1',' 0 1 Z;d !IUJl;-4iB![*] 0IN&PA WA 9-�
26'-0"
8'-6" x 4'-0" 5-0" x 4'-0"
T-0" x 3'-6"
18'-0„ 8•-0,,
26'-0"
LEFT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 'V -0 -
FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0"
RIGHT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
"
9c�8EY'Nu
_ ae
nrAl�ma
€Ea2fi-o�-
z
Q a9�"E^8A-
ce
O app`;a q�,gyoy7
wm �aAe=�`ea9
-00 C
ma
co
co
O o
Qt
0 C
> E
"5 0 cu
� U
� � s
W LU
LIVING BEDROOM -
ROOM
io
cV
0
1'-6"
b
N
e
O
r,
N
1i^2
m
o
x......_...
o � a' o,
BATH 3 -0" X 4'-
�
o
"v
T-0" x 3'-6"
18'-0„ 8•-0,,
26'-0"
LEFT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 'V -0 -
FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0"
RIGHT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
"
9c�8EY'Nu
_ ae
nrAl�ma
€Ea2fi-o�-
z
Q a9�"E^8A-
ce
O app`;a q�,gyoy7
wm �aAe=�`ea9
-00 C
ma
co
co
O o
Qt
0 C
> E
"5 0 cu
� U
� � s
W LU
26'-0"
4'4' x 4'-0" 2'-6" x 4'-0"
LIVING BEDROOM
ROOM
ib
61-01,
T-8"
PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
SCALE IS 1/2 AS SHOWN IF PRINTED ON 11 Xl 7 PAPER
BATH T-0" x 4'-0"
2'-0" x 3'-6"
26'-0"
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
FINISH S.F.
a
11
REAR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
j
CAUTION.
KITCHEN IS DRAWN AT A
L
PRELIMINARY STAGE ON XITCHEN
N3 V1/2"
ALL CABINETS MUST BE
9
VERIFIED ON AN ACTUAL
CABINET LAYOUT
cl ::
KITCHEN
T-8"
PRELIMINARY DRAWINGS ONLY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
SCALE IS 1/2 AS SHOWN IF PRINTED ON 11 Xl 7 PAPER
BATH T-0" x 4'-0"
2'-0" x 3'-6"
26'-0"
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
FINISH S.F.
a
11
REAR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
j
Rea( People. Real Solutions.
September 6, 2017
Mr. Eric Hoversten, City Manager
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
2638 Shadow Lane
Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318-1172
Ph: (952) 448-8838
Fax: (952) 448-8805
Bolton-Menk.com
RE: 2017 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements — Lynwood Blvd/Fairview Ln,
Wilshire Blvd/Maywood Rd/Hiddenvale Ln, Tuxedo Blvd Phase III
City Project Nos. PW -17-01, PW -17-02, PW -17-03, PW -17-04
Pay Request No. 5
Dear Mr. Hoversten:
Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 5 from Park Construction Company for work completed
on the 2017 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project from August 1, 2017
through August 31, 2017.
We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the
amount of $517,803.97 to Park Construction Company.
Sincerely,
Bolton & Menk, Inc. /
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
Project Manager
Bolton & Menk is a
DATE: 8/31/2017
CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 5 CONTRACTOR Park Construction Cc
2017 STREET, UTILITY & RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS OWNER City of Mound
CITY PROJECT NO. 17-01, 17-02, 17-03, 17-04 ENGINEER Bolton & Menk
BMI PROJECT NO. C17.112393, 017.112394, C17.112395
FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 8/1/2017 THROUGH 8/31/2017
TOTALAMOUNT BID............................................................................................................................................. $ 3,247,178.52
APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS + EXTRA WORK..................................................................................... $ 24,019.00
CURRENTCONTRACT AMOUNT........................................................................................................... $ 3,271,197.52
TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE................................................................................................................... $ 1,331,588.20
TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE ..................
........................................ $
DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED.............................................................. $
TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS.......................................................................................... $ 1,331,588.20
RETAINEDPERCENTAC ( 5.0% )................................................................................................ $ 66,579.41
TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS........................................................................................................ $ -
NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE................................................................................................... $ 1,265,008.79
TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES.............................................................................................. $ 747,204.82
PAYCONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO. 5............................................................................................................ $ 517,803.97
Certificate for Payment
I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices
of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been
performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project
between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any
authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount
for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been complied with and that
all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured.
Contractor: Park Construction Company
1481 81stAve. NE
Minneapolis, MN 55432
By
Name Title
Date
CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT:
BOLTON & MENK, INC., ENGINEERS, 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318
By CITY ENGINEER
Brian D. Simmons
Date 9-6-2017
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT:
Owner: CITY OF MOUND
By
Name Title Date
Real People. Real Solutions.
September 6, 2017
Mr. Eric Hoversten, City Manager
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE: 2017 Lift Station and Forcemain Improvement Project
City Project No. PW -17-05
Pay Request No. I
Dear Mr. Hoversten:
2638 Shadow Lane
Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318-1172
Ph: (9521448-8838
Fax: (952) 448-8805
Bolton-Menk.com
Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 1 from Widmer Construction for work completed on the
2017 Lift Station and Forcemain Improvement Project from August 14, 2017 through September
5, 2017.
We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the
amount of $188,152.33 to Widmer Construction, LLC.
Sincerely,
m
J 4u
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
Senior Project Manager
Bolton & Menk is2a�u:
DATE: 9/6/2017
CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 1
CONTRACTOR Widmer Construction
2017 Lift Station and Forcemain Improvements
OWNER City of Mound
CITY PROJECT NO. PW -17-05
ENGINEER Bolton & Menk
BMI PROJECT NO. C17.112191
FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 8/14/2017 THROUGH 9/5/2017
TOTALAMOUNT BID...............................................................................................................................................
$
607,305.00
APPROVEDCHANGE ORDERS.............................................................................................................
$
CURRENTCONTRACT AMOUNT...--...................................................................................................
$
607,305.00
TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE....................................................................................................................
$
198,055.09
TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE ...................... .............. ................ ................. ........
................ - ..... ....... -- $
-
DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED ....... -....................................................
$
-
TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS ......................... --................... ........
-............. ......... ............ $
198,055.09
RETAINED PERCENTAGE5 /° °
( )......................................................................................................
$
9,902.75
TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS.........................................................................................................
$
-
NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE ......................... .......................... --.... ............................
............ . $
188,152.33
TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES . ..... ............................. ....... -....................................
............... $
-
PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO. 1...........................................................................................--.................
$
188,152.33
Certificate for Payment
I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices
of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been
performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project
between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any
authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount
for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been complied with and that
all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured.
Contractor: Widmer Construction, LLC
9455 County Rd. 15
Maple Plain, MN 55359
By
Name Title
Date
CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT:
BOLTON & MENK, INC., ENGINEERS, 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318
By ` ��` CITY ENGINEER
Brian D. Simmons
Date 9-6-2017
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT:
Owner: CITY OF MOUND
By
Name Title Date
-2544-
Real People, Real Solutions.
September 6, 2017
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE: 2017 Manhole Rehabilitation Project
City Project No. PW -17-06
Award of Contract
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council:
2638 Shadow Lane
Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318-1172
Ph: 1952)448-8838
Fax. (9521448-8805
Bolton-Menk.com
Continuing the previous efforts to reduce I & I and to complete required surcharge work, we
have designed and bid a manhole rehabilitation project, focused on the sanitary sewer structures
in the Three Points area. Rehabilitation will seal up those structures and prevent clean water
from entering the sanitary sewer system.
Bids were received for the 2017 Manhole Rehabilitation Project on September 6, 2017.Bids were
received as follows:
1. Hydro-Klean
2.National Power Rodding
$65,736.00
$85,530.00
The low bidder is Hydro-Klean. They have has successfully completed several projects
throughout Minnesota, and are a responsible and responsive bidder.
It is my recommendation to award the 2017 Manhole Rehabilitation Project to Hydro-Klean in
the amount of $65,736.00. A resolution is included recommending award of contract in this
amount to Hydro Klean.
Sincerely,
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Brian D. Simmons, P.E.
City Engineer
H:\MOUN\Cl7ll282O\l-Corres\C-To Others\2017-09-06 Ltr to Council Award M"�
6aitc-n & Menk i. fti
CITY OF (MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 17 -
RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
2017 MANHOLE REHABILITATION PROJECT (PW -17-06)
WHEREAS, the City has an annual Inflow & Infiltration Surcharge levied by the Metropolitan
Council for previous peak flow exceedances in sewer pumped to MCES plants for treatment;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2017 Manhole Rehabilitation Project,
bids were received on September 6, 2017, opened and tabulated according to law, with the
following bids received and complying with the advertisement:
Hydro-Klean $65,736.00
National Power Rodding $85,530.00
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Hydro-Klean is the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to
award the contract for the 2017 Manhole Rehabilitation Project to Hydro-Klean, in the amount of
$65,736.00.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of September, 2017.
Mayor, Mark Wegscheid
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR MCES GRANT FUNDING FOR
2017 MANHOLE•'PROJECT
PROJECTCITY i' 1
HS, the City of Mound Council approved Resolution 17- Resolution Awarding
contract for 2017 Manhole Rehabilitation Project, City project No. PW 17-06 on September 12,
2017; and
WHEREAS, the State Legislature authorized $3.739 Million for the 2017 State Bond Fund
Municipal 1/1 Grant Program (Grantee Program) and designated the Metropolitan Council to
administer this program through the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES);
and
WHEREAS, MCES sent out notice of the grant program and its guidelines to all eligible
cities, which includes the City of Mound, on August 24, 2017 and requested grant
applications by September 22, 2017; and
WHEREAS, the City's Capital Improvement Program includes an annual investment into its
sanitary sewer rehabilitation to minimize clean water infiltration into its sanitary sewer system
and to; and
WHEREAS, City staff has determined the location of sewer manholes in need of
rehabilitation and the City Engineer has prepared and submitted the required application to
MCES by the September 22, 2017 deadline which includes a map of the proposed sanitary
manholes to be rehabilitated as well as an as bid project cost of $65,736.00; and
WHEREAS, the City is applying for grant dollars from the 2017 State Bond Fund Municipal 1/1
Grant Program (Grantee Program)via the MCES;
WHEREAS, the City's estimated Final Reimbursement Amount of $27,011.50 payable upon
completion of the project and submittal of a reimbursement request subsequent to the execution
of a City/MCES Grant Agreement on or after November 15, 2019; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
hereby authorizes submittal of a grant application for the 2017 State Bond Fund Municipal 1/1
Grant Program administered by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) to
partially fund the 2017 Manhole Rehabilitation Project, City Project No. 17-06.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of September, 2017
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
-2547-
Real People. Rea( Solutions.
September 6, 2017
Mr. Eric Hoversten, City Manager
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE: 2017 Seal Coat Project
City Project No. PW -17-07
Pay Request No. 1 and Final
Dear Mr. Hoversten:
2638 Shadow Lane
Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318-1172
Ph: (9521448-8838
Fax: (9521448-8805
Botton-Menk.com
Please find enclosed the Invoice from Allied Blacktop for seal coat work recently completed on
the northerly portion of the 2012 Street Reconstruction project streets. Both sweepings have been
completed as required.
The estimated area to be completed was slightly exceeded, 22,000 estimated square yards vs.
23,014 actual square yards, which resulted in $1,074.84 of additional cost. We have reviewed the
contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $35,394.84 to
Allied Blacktop Company.
Sincerely,
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
Senior Project Manager
H:\MOUN\C17113750\1 Corres\C_To Others\2017-09-06 Ltr of Recdn, Seal Coat, _ - Q�',,QQ ' Final.docx
Bo'toa b. Menk i�-�..`GN.ortunita en
ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY
10503 89th Avenue North
Maple Grove, MN 55369
e LA C KTO P
— Co. —
Phone: (763) 425-0575
Fax: (763) 425-1046
Invoice: 848
Invoice Date: 8/16/2017
Bill To:
Project Details:
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
2415 WILSHIRE BLVD.
MOUND, MN 55364-1668
17M283 MOU004
Payment Terms Contract Number Invoice Due Date
NET 30 9/15/2017
Description
2017 SEAL COAT PROJECT
1) MOBILIZATION: LS 1 @ $2,500.00 = $2,500.00
2) TRAFFIC CONTROL: LS 1 @ $2,500.00 = $2,500.00
3) STREET SWEEPING: LS 1 @ $4,500,00 = $4,500.00
4) SECOND SWEEP: LS I @ $1,500.00 = $1,500.00
5) BITUMINOUS SEAL COAT: 23,014 SY @ $1.06 = $24,394.84
Description Invoice Amount.. Retainage Current Due
35,394.84 0.00 35,394.84
Subtotal Amount 35,394.84 0.00 35,394.84
Tax Amount ('T' Indicates a taxable line) 0,00
Total Invoice Amount Due 35,394,84
Page: 1
-2549-
Real People. Real Solutions.
September 6, 2017
Mr. Eric Hoversten, City Manager
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE: Project related pay requests
Dear Mr. Hoversten:
2638 Shadow Lane
Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318-1172
Ph: (9521448-8838
Fax: (9521448-8805
Bolton-Menk.com
Please find enclosed the following project related pay requests which have been reviewed and
are in accordance with approved proposals for the 2016 Street Improvement project and the 2017
Street Improvement project. I recommend payment of these requests.
1. Braun Intertec:
0 2016 Street Reconstruction project: $10,946.00 for construction materials testing
and additional pavement depth evaluation, per approved Agreements
. 2017 Street Reconstruction project: $3,384.21 for construction materials testing,
per approved Agreement.
Sincerely,
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
Senior Project Manager
Colton & Monk i,
BRAUN
PLEASE REMIT TO
Braun Intertec Corporation
NW 7644 PO Box 1450
INTERTEC
Minneapolis, NIN 55485
The Science You Build On.
-
Telephone
Fax
Tax I.D.
Dan Faulkner
City of Mound
2638 Shadow Lane
Chaska, MN 55318
2016 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall Impts-SAP 145-
103-003
Construction Materials Testing
Bartlett Boulevard, Cypress Lane, Maywood Road
Mound, MN
For Professional Services rendered through 7/7/2017
1 - MnDOT Testing
1.2 - Concrete Testing
1.4 - Project Management, Engineering Review & Oversight
1.5 - Falling Weight Deflectometer
1.6 - Groud Penetrating Radar and Coring
Amount Previously Invoiced: $22,717.25
Amount Invoiced to Date: $30,562.00
Please pay from this invoice.
Terms: Due on receipt, 1 1/2% per month after 30 days, 18% annual percentage rate.
(952) 995-2000
(952) 995-2020
41-1684205
Date 7/20/2017
Invoice number 8098456
Project ID 81603816
Customer account M13913
Customer PO
$683.00
$1,497.25
$1,899.25
$3,765.25
Tota[Fees
$7,844.75
$7,844.75
Page 1 of 2
Projects: 81603816 - 2016 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall Impts-SAP 145-103-003 Invoice number: B098456
Qty/Hours Rate Amount
1 - MnDOT Testing
1.2 - Concrete Testing
Consulting Services Detail
Concrete Testing
Concrete Cylinder Pick up
Non -Salary Detail
Compressive strength of concrete cylinders
(ASTM C 39), per specimen
CMT Trip Charge
Total 1.2 - Concrete Testing
1.4 - Project Management, Engineering Review &
Oversight
Consulting Services Detail
Senior Engineer
Project Manager
Project Assistant
Non -Salary Detail
CMT Trip Charge
Total 1.4 - Project Management, Engineering Review & Oversight
1.5 - Falling Weight Deflectometer
Consulting Services Detail
Senior Engineer
Project Assistant
GIS Technician
Non -Salary Detail
FWD Testing, per hour
FWD Mobilization per mile
Total 1.5 - Failing Weight Deflectometer
1.6 - Groud Penetrating Radar and Coring
Consulting Services Detail
Senior Engineer
Project Manager
Project Assistant
Bituminous Coring
Non -Salary Detail
Ground Penetrating Radar, per hour on site
(includes equipment)
CMT Trip Charge
Mobilization
Total 1.6 - Groud Penetrating Radar and Coring
Total 1 - MnDOT Testing
Total Project
-2552-
4.50
76.00
342.00
1.00
76.00
76.00
5.00
29.00
145.00
3.00
40.00
120.00
3.00
180.00
$683.00
1.00
3.00
182.00
546.00
4.25
162.00
688.50
2.75
81.00
222.75
1.00
40.00
40.00
$1,497.25
4.00
182.00
728.00
0.25
81.00
20.25
0.60
110.00
66.00
4.00
230.00
920.00
50.00
3.30
165.00
$1,899.25
11.50
182.00
2,093.00
0.25
162.00
40.50
1.75
81.00
141.75
4.00
190.00
760.00
3.00
180.00
540.00
1.00
40.00
40.00
1.00
150.00
150.00
$3,765.25
$7,844.75
$7,844.7S
Page 2 of 2
PLEASE REMIT TO
BRAUN Braun Intertec Corporation
INTERTEu
i Nw 7644 PO Box 1450
Minneapolis, MN 55485
The Science You Build On.
Telephone (952) 995-2000
Fax (952)995-2020
Tax I.D. 41-1684205
Matt Bauman
Date 8/30/2017
City of Mound
Invoice number B102771
2638 Shadow Lane
Project ID B1603816
Chaska, MN 55318
Customer account M 13 913
Customer PO
2016 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall Impts-SAP 145-
103-003
Construction Materials Testing
Bartlett Boulevard, Cypress Lane, Maywood Road
Mound, MN
For Professional Services rendered through 8/18/2017
1- MnDOT Testing
1.3 - Pavement Testing
1.4 - Project Management, Engineering Review & Oversight
Amount Previously Invoiced: $30,562.00
Amount Invoiced to Date: $33,663.25
Please pay from this invoice.
Terms: Due on receipt, 11/2% per month after 30 days, 18% annual percentage rate.
$2,423.00
$678.25
$3,101.25
Total Fees $3,101.25
Page 1 of 2
Projects: 81603816 - 2016 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall Impts-SAP 145-103-003 Invoice number: 8102771
Qty/Hours Rate Amount
1 - MnDOT Testing
1.3 - Pavement Testing
Consulting Services Detail
Sample pick-up
Non -Salary Detail
Rice specific gravity (ASTM D 2041), per sample
Asphalt Content (ASTM D 2172/6307), per
sample
Extracted aggregate gradation (ASTM D 5444),
per sample
Gyratory gravity (AASHTO T312), per sample
Percent crushed (ASTM D5821), per sample
Fine Aggregate Angularity (ASTM C1252), per
sample
CMT Trip Charge
Total 1.3 - Pavement Testing
1.4 - Project Management, Engineering Review &
Oversight
Consulting Services Detail
Project Manager
Senior Project Manager
Project Assistant
Total 1.4 - Project Management, Engineering Review & Oversight
Total 1 - MnDOT Testing
Total Project
-2554-
4.50
76.00
342.00
3.00
79.00
237.00
3.00
150.00
450.00
3.00
103.00
309.00
3.00
180.00
540.00
3.00
79.00
237.00
3.00
76.00
228.00
2.00
40.00
80.00
$2,423.00
3.25 162.00 526.50
0.50 182.00 91.00
0.75 81.00 60.75
$678.25
$3,101.25
$3.101.25
Page 2 of 2
BRAUN
INTERTEC
The Science You Build On.
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
2017 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall Impts SAP 145-
103-004
Construction Materials Testing
Various Streets
Mound, MN 55364
For Professional Services rendered through 6/16/2017
1 - MnDOT Testing
1.4 - Project Management
Amount Previously Invoiced: $0.00
Amount Invoiced to Date: $826.87
Please pay from this invoice.
Terms: Due on receipt, 1 1/2% per month after 30 days, 18% annual percentage rate.
PLEASE REMIT TO
Braun Intertec Corporation
NW 7644 PO Box 1450
Minneapolis, MN 55485
Telephone (952) 995-2000
Fax (952) 995-2020
Tax I.D. 41-168420S
Date 6/28/2017
Invoice number 8096464
Project ID 61704069
Customer account M13913
Customer PO
$826.87
Total Fees
$826.87
$826.87
Page 1 of 2
Projects: 81704069 - 2017 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall Impts SAP 145-103-004 Invoice number• B096464
Qty/Hours Rate Amount
1 - MnDOT Testing
1.4 - Project Management
Consulting Services Detail
Project Manager
Senior Project Manager
Non -Salary Detail
Vehicle, per mile
Total 1.4 - Project Management
Total 1 - MnDOT Testing
Total Project
-2556-
4.50 167.00 751.50
0.25 187.00 46.75
54,00
0.53 28.62
$826.87
$826.87
$826.87
Page 2 of 2
PLEASE REMIT TO
BRAUN Braun Intertec Corporation
NW 7644 PO Box 1450
Minneapolis, MN 55485
The Science You Build On. Telephone
Fax
Tax I.D.
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
2017 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall Impts SAP 145-
103-004
Construction Materials Testing
Various Streets
Mound, MN 55364
For Professional Services rendered through 8/11/2017
1 - MnDOT Testing
1.1 - Soil Testing
1.2 - Concrete Testing
1.4 - Project Management
Amount Previously Invoiced: $6,384.41
Amount Invoiced to Date: $8,941.75
Please pay from this invoice.
Terms: Due on receipt, 1 1/2% per month after 30 days, 18% annual percentage rate.
(952) 995-2000
(952) 995-2020
41-1684205
Date 8/21/2017
Invoice number 8101604
Project ID B1704069
Customer account M13913
Customer PO
$1,537.65
$310.44
$709.25
Total Fees
$2,557.34
$2,557.34
Page 1 of 2
Projects: 81704069 - 2017 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall Impts SAP 145-103-004 Invoice number: 8101604
Qty/Hours Rate Amount
1 - MnDOT Testing
1.1 - Soil Testing
Consulting Services Detail
Compaction Testing - Nuclear
Sample pick-up
Compaction Testing - Sandcone & DCP
Field Moisture Testing
Non -Salary Detail
Sieve analysis & 200 wash (ASTM C 136 & C
117) per sample
Nuclear moisture -density meter charge, per
hour
Standard Proctor Test(ASTM D 698)
Asphalt Content (ASTM D 2172/6307), per
sample
Vehicle, per mile
Total 1.1 - Soil Testing
1.2 - Concrete Testing
Consulting Services Detail
Concrete Testing
Non -Salary Detail
Compressive strength of concrete cylinders
(ASTM C 39), per specimen
Vehicle, per mile
Total 1.2 - Concrete Testing
1.4 - Project Management
Consulting Services Detail
Project Manager
Project Assistant
Total 1.4 - Project Management
Total 1 - MnDOT Testing
Total Project
S
3.25
78.00
253.50
2.00
78.00
156.00
0.50
78.00
39.00
1.00
78.00
78.00
3.00
133.00
399.00
3.25
23.00
74.75
1.00
185.00
185.00
2.00
155.00
310.00
80.00
0.53
42.40
$1,537.65
2.50
78.00
195.00
3.00
30.00
90.00
48.00
0.53
25.44
$310.44
3.75
167.00
626.25
1.00
83.00
83.00
$709.25
$2,557.34
$2.557.34
Page 2 of 2
Real People. Real Solutions.
September 6, 2017
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE: City of Mound Wellhead Protection Plan
Request Approval of Consultant Contract to Amend Plan
Dear Mayor and Members of the Council:
2638 Shadow Lane
Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318-1172
Ph: 1952) 448-8838
Fax: (9521448-8805
Bolton-Menk.com
The City's current Wellhead Protection Plan was approved in 2009 by the MN Department of Health
(MDH). It is now time to begin the required process of updating the plan, as required to be done every ten
years per MDH Rules.
A July 13, 2017 letter from the MDH is attached which contains the results of our meeting with their staff
as well as their Scoping Decision No. 1 for amending the City's current Wellhead Protection Plan. The
letter contains the detailed information that is required by MN Rules including the development of a
model to determine hydrogeological conditions in the areas surrounding the City's two production wells.
This is a very specific type of work that necessitates the use of an "expert" consultant to develop these
models and assess the conditions.
Therefore, a request for proposal was sent to two of the metropolitan area engineering firms that have this
level of expertise, Braun Intertec and Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. A copy of each proposal is
attached for your information.
A resolution has been prepared for your consideration recommending approval of the proposal submitted
by Braun Intertec.
Sincerely,
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
Senior Project Manager
H:\MOUN\C1240166\2017-09-06 Ltr to Council Reciting Approval of Consultant Pr .I---- . nendment.docx
Botton & Menk is .?7e Plzltunity employ
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO.
PROTECTION
WHEREAS, the City's current Wellhead Protection Plan (WHP) was approved by the Minnesota
Department of Health in 2009; and
WHEREAS, MN Rules parts 4720.5100 to 4720.5590 establish requirements for Wellhead
Protection Plans which includes updating and amending on a ten-year cycle; and
WHEREAS, these requirements require hydrogeological modeling of groundwater flow and
analysis by a qualified hydrogeologist; and
WHEREAS, a request for proposal was sent to two qualified engineering firms that have
completed similar modeling for other communities in the metropolitan area; and
WHEREAS, proposals where received from these two firms, Braun Intertec and Leggette,
Brashears & Graham, Inc., and evaluated; and
WHEREAS, the proposal submitted by Braun Intertec was both more complete and less costly
than that of Leggette, Brashears & Graham, $14,800 versus $20,000;
NOW, THEREFORE DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to
approve the proposal submitted and attached for reference by Braun Intertec to update and
amend Part I of the City's current Wellhead Protection Plan in accordance with MN Rules parts
4720.5100 to 4720.5590.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of September, 2017.
Mark Wegscheid, Mayor
ATTEST:
Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
-2561-
resourceful. OOhJFO|L^m . BA�
�� m^ 0��
engineering and environmental consultants
July I9,2OI7
Mr. Brian Simmons
Mound City Engineer
Bolton &K4enk,Inc
2638Shadow Lane
Suite 200
Chaska, K4N553l8-ll72
Re: Proposal hnProvide Wellhead Protection Planning Services hothe City cfMound
Dear Simmons:
Barr Engineering Company is pleased tosubmit our proposal tothe City ofMound toupdate
Part l of the City's wellhead protection plan. Ban's extensive experience preparing wellhead protection
plans will benefit Mound in several ways. Our understanding of groundwater modeling, hydrogeology,
and the wellhead protection rules allows us to help you navigate the regulations swiftly and set you up for
success in the wellhead protection planning process. These competencies are key to successful planning
and we believe no other firm can offer you the same level of expertise and experience that Barr can bring.
Barr iswell suited toupdate your wellhead protection plan because our:
Extensive groundwater modeling experience will save time and reduce project cost. Barr
has been developing and refining groundwater flow models of the Twin Cities metropolitan area
for over two decades. For the Metropolitan Council, we constructed Metro Model 2 and the
update known as Metro Model 3. Metro Model 3 covers the expanded eleven -county
metropolitan area and incorporates updates and information not available in Metro Model 2. We
have used Metro Models Z and ] as the basis for models used todelineate wellhead protection
areas (VHPAs) for multiple communities inthe Twin Cities metropolitan area. The Minnesota
Department of Health is requiring that Mound use a new model based on Metro Model 2 or
Metro Model 3 for the delineation of the WHPAs. Our experience with these models allows us to
complete your project efficiently and cost effectively. We have prepared over 30 wellhead
protection plans and updates in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. For some clients, this includes
both the original Plan and the amendment. We are currently working onfour plans for other
Detailed understanding ofMetro Model 3and Mound's hydrogeologic setting will result hm
an efficient and accurate WHPA delineation. Regardless of the firm you hire, the MDH has
indicated that a model based on Metro Model 2 or Metro Model 3 must be used for your WHPA
delineation update. In recognition of Barr's expertise and leadership in groundwater modeling,
the Metropolitan Council hired ustodevelop both Metro Model 2and Metro Model 3. Metro
Model 3 covers the expanded 11 -county metropolitan area. Barr completed development of
Metro Model 3 for the Metropolitan Council in 2014. In addition to this, Barr has conducted
numerous hydrogeologic studies and constructed over 100 models for various locales in the Twin
Cities metropolitan area, including work for cities near Mound, such as Victoria and Chanhassen
��
BonEnghneehngCo. 430Ok4orkefPo�feDhv*'3uh����r�mn*opolis'MN55435 952.8322600 wv*v.bun.com
Mr. Brian Simmons
July 19, 2017
Paae 2
as well as work at the Tonka -Mound site. Building on our work in the vicinity of Mound will allow
us to rapidly and accurately delineate your WHPA.
In-depth knowledge of the rules ensures swift navigation of the regulatory process. Barr
understands the wellhead protection rules. Barr staff sat on the committees that tracked the
development of the wellhead protection rules and reviewed them before they were put into law in
1994. Since that time, we have worked with numerous clients to prepare their plans.
Technical credibility and ability to communicate with state regulators and local
stakeholders gains project support and respect. Our modeling team has a strong technical
reputation and has worked successfully with local Minnesota regulators as well as directly for
State agencies for many years. We are highly respected by the Minnesota Department of Health's
wellhead protection staff',for our work. We are frequently called on to explain groundwater
modeling and flow issues at public meetings and to elected officials and the media.
Rapid, direct, and personal access to all the expertise needed for the success of this
project. Our office is a 35 -minute drive from the Mound City Hall. That means you are only 35
minutes away from 40 full-time professionals dedicated solely to groundwater modeling and
hydrogeologic evaluations. We have all the modeling and GIS capabilities you need under one
roof. This translates into a high level of responsiveness. Many of the other municipal consultants
in the metro area recognize this and hire us to perform groundwater modeling for their projects
rather than try to bring on their own modelers.
This project will be led by senior groundwater professionals from our Minneapolis office, each of whom
has been with Barr for over 20 years. Our team includes members skilled at hydrogeology, groundwater
modeling, and water supply planning. We bring all the experience needed to ensure project success.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide you this proposal. If you have any questions regarding our
proposal, please feel free contact me (952-832-2774 or blemon@barr.com) or John Greer (952-832-2691
or jgreer@barr.com), the project manager who will work with you on this project.
Sincerely,
Brian LeMon, PE
Vice President, Senior Civil Engineer
-2564-
e_x �
reer, PG, CPG
Hydrogeologist
L
whychoose Barr?........................................................................................................................1
companyoverview..................................................................................... ............................4
projectunderstanding................................................................................................................5
scope of work and assumptions................................................................................................
7
task 1: data compilation and pre -delineation meeting....................................................7
task2: WHPA delineation.......................................................................................................8
task3: DWSMA delineation....................................................................................................9
task 4: well and aquifer vulnerability assessments............................................................10
task 5: draft and final reports...............................................................................................
10
task 6: public information meeting.....................................................................................
1 1
projectschedule........................................................................................................................12
costestimate..............................................................................................................................13
projectteam...............................................................................................................................14
relatedexperience....................................................................................................................
16
attachmentA: resumes............................................................................................................19
attachment B: cost breakout...................................................................................................31
/A;S0 `"1/1.8.1%
This page intentionally left blank
why, choose Barr?
Wellhead protection planning is ultimately about protecting your water supply, thereby protecting
the public health. Mound gets its water from wells pumping from a confined Quaternary -age sand
and gravel aquifer and the Prairie du Chien Group -Jordan Sandstone aquifers. Proper wellhead
protection planning will ensure that you understand where the water appropriated from your wells
comes from so that you can manage surface land uses, which may impact water quality. The State
has correctly determined that the only reasonable way to understand where water entering a well
originates is through detailed groundwater modeling and, since 1994, has required its use in the
preparation of wellhead protection planning. Wellhead protection planning is also about following a
regulatory process that involves reviews, notifications, and cooperation with State regional
hydrogeologists who manage the program.
• Understanding groundwater modeling and hydrogeology
• Understanding the wellhead protection rules
• Understanding Mound and its hydrogeologic setting
So why choose Barr to perform your current wellhead protection plan amendment? Plainly stated, no
other firm can offer you the level of expertise and experience in all three areas. The City of Mound
will benefit by selecting Barr to perform the wellhead protection plan amendment because our:
In depth knowledge of regional hydroeoloy and groundwater modeling will
ensure an accurate delineation of your drinking wafer supply management
area and credibility with regulators. Barr is the recognized regional leader in groundwater
modeling and was selected by the Metropolitan Council to prepare both Metro Model 2 and the
update known as Metro Model 3 that was released in 2014. Metro Models 2 and 3 are
MODFLOW-based groundwater models of the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Metro Model 2
covers the seven -county metropolitan area while Metro Model 3 covers the expanded eleven -
county metropolitan area. In addition to the expanded area, Metro Model 3 incorporates updates
not available in Metro Model 2. Updates include more detailed definition of unconsolidated
Quaternary sediments near Mound that could affect the flow of groundwater to your wells and in
turn the shape of your Drinking Water Supply Management Area. The Metropolitan Council hired
Barr to prepare Metro Models 2 and 3 to ensure that all groundwater planning in the region is
based on a common and accurate model. As stated in Scoping Decision Notice No. 1 dated
December 2, 2016, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) expects that any firm you hire
will use a groundwater model based on Metro Model 2 or Metro Model 3 to delineate your
wellhead protection areas (WHPAs). For work we recently completed for the City of Victoria, we
constructed a detailed groundwater model based on Metro Model 3. Using this model as the
starting point for your project will allow us to rapidly and accurately delineate your WHPAs. Barr
has provided our clients with engineering and groundwater modeling services to address a wide
variety of groundwater supply issues, including numerous wellhead protection area delineations.
Our modelers have built over 100 models of the Twin Cities metropolitan area, and, as you likely
know' have conducted numerous detailed hvdrogado0ic inveotigations, including in the Mound
(mdepth knowledge cfthe rules ensures mwiffnavigation ofthe regulatory
process. We understand the wellhead protection rules (MRs Parts 4720.5100 to 4720.5590).
Barr staff sat on the committees that tracked and reviewed the rules before they were put into
law inly94. Since that time, we have worked with numerous clients to prepare their wellhead
protection plans. Our modeling team has astrong technical reputation with Minnesota
regulators, and our hydrogeologic investigations and groundwater models regularly undergo
review and approval byregulators aswell asreview byenvironmental groups. Since l0y4'we
have prepared over 30 wellhead protection plans—originals and amendments, Parts 1 and 2—in
the seven -county Twin [ides metropolitan area and elsewhere in the State. Currently, we are
working onfour plans for other cities.
Technical credibility with state regulators and local stakeholders gains project support
and respect. Our team has worked successfully with local regulators as well as directly for state
agencies for many years. We are highly respected by MDH's wellhead protection staff for our
work and are frequently called on to explain groundwater modeling and flow issues at public
meetings and to elected officials and the media. Our continued presence and leadership in the
groundwater modeling community ensures the credibility you need to rapidly obtain the
approvals needed. The regulators know us and work with our staff on a day-to-day basis on
wellhead protection plan (VVHPP) and many other groundwater -related issues.
Barr does not just want to win this work to update your wellhead protection plan; we want to build a
relationship with you and your regular municipal consultant (whom wework with on a regular basis)
to be your long-term trusted groundwater consultant and be available for you to call us whenever
you have questions about groundwater and your wells.
Barr's wellhead protection plan (WHPP) development services
Groundwater Modeling to delineate your wellhead protection area (WHPA)
Geologic & Hydrogeologic Evaluation of well and aquifer vulnerability in your drinking water supply
management area (DWSMA)
GIS mapping to delineate your DWSMA
Plan preparation to prepare a Part 1 WHPP that meets MDH requirements
Public presentation of WHPA/DWSMA delineations at the MDH-required public information meeting after
approval of Part 1 of the WHPP
Part 2 WHPP services
GIS mapping to inventory potential contaminant sources and verify locations
Planning to identify strategies and activities for managing your DWSMA and to assist with implementation
of the wellhead protection plan
Plan preparation to prepare a Part 2 WHPP that meets MDH requirements
Public presentation of the entire WHPP at the MDH-required public hearing before Part 2 of the WHPP is
submitted for MDH approval
company overview
For over 50 years, Barr has provided engineering and environmental consulting services to clients
across the Midwest, throughout the Americas, and around the world. One of our specialties is the
quantitative evaluation of water -resource problems—both surface water and groundwater.
Working together, our more than 750 engineers, scientists, and support specialists help clients
develop, manage, and restore natural resources and infrastructure. We work with municipalities,
counties, states, and government agencies, as well as with clients in industries such as power,
refining, mining, and manufacturing.
expertise in roundwater models in a
variety of ! 4ings
Barr's hydrogeologists are experts at applying the right model and
level of study to solve virtually any groundwater problem. We have
used groundwater modeling for projects ranging from WHPA
delineation to water supply and well field siting studies to
sophisticated groundwater flow and contaminant transport predictions
to geotechnical evaluations. We have been using groundwater flow
models in various forms since the early 1970s and excel at keeping
costs down, working with regulators, and explaining results to the
public. We are active in the development and implementation of new,
cutting-edge modeling techniques and tools, and our experience helps
us develop models capable of answering tough questions in a wide F"
range of hydrogeologic settings. As shown in the table for the Metropolitan Council, Barr constructed
below, our groundwater modeling toolbox includes Metro Model 3 - a MODFLOW model of the eleven -
numerous model codes including finite difference, finite county metropolitan area.
element, and analytic element models.
Barr's groundwater modeling -software expertise
MODFLOW, MODFLOW2000, MODFLOW-NWT, MODFLOW-USG, MODFLOW-Surfact, FEFLOW, MLAEM,
SLAEM, SLAEM-S, TTim, TIrnML, GROW, SEEP/W, MIKE SHE
Contaminant transport
MT3DMS, RT31)
Automated inverse optimization and model pre -arid pbst-processing
PEST, UCODE, Groundwater Vistas, GMS
project undersfandin,g
It is our understanding that the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) staff held Scoping Meeting
No. 1 with City of Mound staff on November 21, 2016. At the scoping meeting, the preparation of an
amendment of Part 1 of the Mound WHPP was discussed. The delineation of WHPAs for each of the
City's wells must be done according to the requirements of Minnesota Rules 4720.5100 through
4720.5590 (the wellhead protection rules). The Part 1 WHPP amendment must address the data
elements identified in MDH's December 2, 2016 Scoping Decision Notice No. 1. Amal Djerrari will be
the MDH's technical reviewer for the Part 1 WHPP amendment. Mound will benefit from the fact that
Barr has worked with Amal on numerous WHPP projects and will be able to provide a plan that he is
used to reviewing.
Scoping Decision Notice No. 1 identifies the two City of Mound primary municipal water supply wells
along with one emergency water supply well:
Mound municipal wells
206994 Primary 1947 317 Prairie du Chien -
Jordan
8 699091 Primary 2003 304 Quaternary sand
and gravel
As indicated in the table above, one of the primary Mound municipal wells pumps from the Prairie du
Chien and Jordan aquifers and the other primary well pumps from a Quaternary -age sand and gravel
aquifer. Both wells are classified as primary water supply wells. Per the scoping decision notice, a
WHPA must be delineated for each of the City's primary water supply wells. It is not necessary to
delineate a WHPA for the emergency well.
As shown on the adjacent figure, the aquifer
vulnerability classification in the current
Mound DWSMAs ranges from "Low" to
"Moderate". Since there is not an area within
the current DWSMAs in which aquifer
vulnerability is classified as "High" we
anticipate that, in keeping with current MDH
policy, a surface water catchment area (SWCA)
will not need to be delineated.
It is our understanding that the MDH is
requiring a fracture flow delineation be
completed for Well 3 in addition to the porous media flow delineation that is required for both Wells
3 and 8. It is also our understanding that no aquifer test will need to be performed as part of the
work to be completed for the Part 1 WHPP amendment.
We also note that the December 2, 2016 Scoping Decision Notice specifies that the City of Mound
must complete the amendment of Parts 1 and 2 of the WHPP by June 11, 2019. Barr will be able to
meet your schedule assuming that all City reviews are provided promptly.
assumptionsscope of work and
Our proposed scope of work presented below is based on our review of the December 2, 2016
Scoping Decision Notice No. 1 that Mound received from the MDH, our review of the Hennepin
County Geologic Atlas, our review of the March 2008 Mound Part 1 WHPP, our knowledge of the
most current understanding of the bedrock aquifers in the vicinity of Mound, our recent experience
with the Victoria Well Field Siting Study, as well as our investigation, modeling, and remediation of
the Tonka Mound site and our extensive experience with developing WHPPs and WHPP amendments.
task e data compilationr - (i ti
We have assumed that the City has, or will soon, send the notification of intent to amend the WHPP
to surrounding local units of government. Therefore, the first task Barr will complete is to prepare for
and participate in the Pre -Delineation Meeting with MDH staff. Meeting preparation will include:
m Compilation of available hydrogeologic information for the area around Mound.
® Preparation of the conceptual hydrogeologic model.
e Preparation of the required Determination of Aquifer Properties and Aquifer Test Plan (DAP -ATP)
Forms for the aquifers from which the Mound municipal wells pump.
® Development of the proposed pumping rates to be used in the WHPA delineations.
The purpose of the Pre -Delineation Meeting is to present the conceptual hydrogeologic model on
which the WHPA delineations will be based to the MDH hydrologist and discuss the approach that
will be taken for the WHPA delineation.
• Notice of intent to amend the Part 1 WHPP has already been sent out by the City or will be sent
out soon.
® The Pre -Delineation Meeting will last no more than two hours and will be held at Barr's office to
save travel costs. City staff would be welcome to attend this meeting in person or via conference
call.
• The 2011-2015 pumping totals for each Mound well shown in Table 2 of Scoping Decision Notice
no. 1 are correct.
® The City will provide the 2016 pumping total for each of the Mound wells.
® The City will provide projections of 2022 water demand or data that Barr can use to develop a
projected 2022 water demand. The projected water demand will be used in the determination of
pumping rates for the WHPA delineations.
• Existing data from the Well 3 and Well 8 pumping tests cited in the 2008 Mound Part 1 WHPP
can be used as the basis for preparing the required DAP -ATP Forms. It is also assumed that the
City will provide Barr with a copy of available documentation for the Well 8 pumping test.
• No new aquifer testing will be required for the Part 1 WHPP amendment preparation.
• MDH requires at least two geologic cross sections through the DWSMA to support the
conceptual hydrogeologic model and aquifer vulnerability assessments. We reviewed the cross
sections in the 2008 Mound Part 1 WHPP and noted that they do not include newer information
developed by the Minnesota Geological Survey regarding faults in the bedrock in the vicinity of
Mound. Based on our experience with preparing Part 1 WHPPs, it is possible that the MDH will
find the cross sections in the 2008 report acceptable, but we cannot guarantee this will be the
case. We have assumed that the MDH will allow the 2008 cross sections to be used in the Part 1
WHPP amendment. Our base cost includes this assumption. We have provided in Table B-1 an
optional cost for the preparation of two new geologic cross sections So that you know what the
cost would be if the MDH requires that new cross sections be prepared.
Tasks to be completed after the Pre -Delineation Meeting include:
® Set up of the groundwater flow model that will be used to delineate the WHPAs based on the
discussions at the Pre -Delineation Meeting.
® Evaluation of model calibration and sensitivity.
® Delineation of the WHPA for each Mound primary water supply well.
® Delineation of the DWSMA(s) that encompass the new WHPAs.
• Well and aquifer vulnerability assessments.
® Preparation of the report.
The existing WHPA delineations for the Mound municipal wells was done prior to the development
of Metro Models 2 and 3. As stated in the December 2, 2016 Scoping Decision Notice, the MDH is
requiring that a MODFLOW groundwater model based on Metro Model 2 or Metro Model 3 be used
to delineate the new Mound WHPAs. We believe that a model based on Metro Model 3 would be the
most appropriate for this project because Metro Model 3 includes improvements not available in
Metro Model 2 and, therefore, will be more accurate. Barr recently prepared a Metro Model 3 -based
groundwater model for the well field siting study that we performed for the City of Victoria. This
model includes local refinements not found in Metro Model 3. We propose to use this model as the
starting point from which a model for delineating the new WHPAs for the Mound municipal wells will
be prepared. We anticipate that it will be necessary to add some additional detail to the model in the
vicinity of Mound.
assumptions:
® Barr will prepare a groundwater model with a
refined model grid around the Mound wells to
be consistent with MDH policy for groundwater
models used to delineate WHPAs.
® Barr will make adjustments to hydraulic
conductivity distributions for the Quaternary, if
necessary to better represent local stratigraphic
detail in the vicinity of Mound.
Barr will adjust hydraulic conductivity
distributions and make other necessary
Bedrock faults near Mound, not known in the last
modifications to incorporate what is known update of WHPP, are shown in red.
about recently identified faults that cut through the bedrock units in the vicinity of Mound. The
presence of the faults can, potentially, affect the WHPA delineations as they can alter
groundwater flow between bedrock units and also between bedrock aquifers and adjacent
unconsolidated Quaternary sand and gravel aquifers. Therefore, it is important to ensure the
faults are included in the groundwater model. Note that the 2008 Mound Part 1 WHPP did not
include these faults since they were not identified until the Minnesota Geological Survey
published their 2013 Metro Area Bedrock Geology Map.
• The updated model will be used for the porous media flow delineation of 1 -year and 10 -year
groundwater time of travel zones around each of the Mound water supply wells.
® Groundwater flow boundaries (such as lakes, rivers, and high capacity wells in the vicinity of
Mound) are included in the model. Therefore, it will not be necessary to add additional
boundaries to the model.
• The City of Mound will verify that the well coordinates for the Mound municipal wells used by
the MDH and available in the Minnesota County Well Index are correct.
® Per MDH requirements, Barr will update pumping rates for the Mound municipal wells to reflect
projected 2022 pumping from the wells. Pumping rates in Metro Model 3 for other high capacity
wells in the vicinity of Mound will not need to be modified.
® Per the Scoping Decision Notice, the MDH is requiring that a fracture flow evaluation be
performed for Well 3. Barr will perform this evaluation.
• The wellhead protection rules require that data from aquifer tests be used to determine the
aquifer_transmissivity used in the groundwater model for delineating the WHPAs. As indicated
above, it is assumed that no new aquifer test will need to be performed for this project. It is
assumed that aquifer transmissivity information used during preparation of the 2008 Part 1
WHPP will be adequate.
® Based on our experience with preparing local scale models based on Metro Model 3, we have
assumed that no additional calibration of the groundwater model will be necessary.
• Based on our experience with developing Part 1 WHPPs and in keeping with typical MDH
requirements, a model sensitivity analysis will be performed.
m The aquifer vulnerability classification in the current Mound DWSMAs ranges from "Low" to
"Moderate". Therefore, we assume that no areas in which aquifer vulnerability is classified as
"High" will be identified in the new DWSMA(s) and that an SWCA delineation will not be
required.
Following delineation of the WHPAs, Barr will delineate the DWSMA(s) for the Mound wells. The
wellhead protection rules require that DWSMAs completely encompass WHPAs and that DWSMAs be
defined using identifiable geographic boundaries (e.g., property parcels boundaries, roads, municipal
boundaries, etc.).
w The DWSMA(s) will be delineated using property parcel boundaries, to the extent possible, using
GIS methods.
• The City of Mound will provide a current ESRI shapefile of property parcels for use in the
DWSMA delineation or assist Barr in obtaining the shapefile from Hennepin County.
Barr will complete well and aquifer vulnerability assessments as required by wellhead protection rules
for Part 1 WHPPs.
• The MDH will provide copies of their well vulnerability scoring sheets for the Mound wells.
+ The MDH well vulnerability scoring sheets for the Mound wells will not require revisions.
® Aquifer vulnerability will be assessed for the DWSMA using existing geologic information such as
well logs stored in the Minnesota Well Index and available water quality information for the
source water aquifers in Mound. The aquifer vulnerability assessments for the existing Mound
DWSMAs will be reviewed, and any changes to the current aquifer vulnerability assessment will
be identified in the report.
® The City and the MDH will provide water quality data for the Mound wells that is in their files.
After completing the vulnerability assessments, Barr will prepare a draft report to satisfy the MDH
reporting requirements for Part 1 of the WHPP. The draft report will be provided to the City in PDF
format for review. Following City review of the draft report, we will make any necessary revisions to
address comments from the City and submit the draft report (in PDF format), along with the
associated model files and GIS files, electronically to the MDH for preliminary review. Upon receipt of
any comments from the MDH, we will prepare the final report. The state legally -required
professional geologist certification of the final report will be provided by John Greer of Barr.
The final report will be published electronically on CDs for submittal to the MDH since the
Department requires the submittal of Part 1 WHPPs for approval consist of two CDs containing the
report (in PDF format) and associated model and GIS files. In addition, one CD containing the final
report (in PDF format) and the associated model and GIS files will be provided to the City.
assumptions:
• Barr will provide an electronic copy (in PDF format) of the draft report to the City for review.
• In keeping with our standard practice for draft Part 1 WHPP preparation, Barr will submit the
draft report (including model and GIS files) to the MDH in electronic format for preliminary
review unless directed otherwise by the City.
® Barr will submit the final report to the MDH for approval on behalf of the City of Mound unless
directed otherwise by the City. If the City prefers to submit the final report for approval, Barr will
provide the City with a draft submittal letter and the two CDs containing the report, model files,
and GIS files to be submitted to the MDH.
In addition to preparing two CDs containing the final report and supporting files for submittal to
the MDH, Barr will prepare one CD for the City and one CD for our files. Paper copies of the
report can be provided to the City for an additional cost.
After the Part 1 WHPP amendment is approved by the MDH, the wellhead protection rules require
that the results of Part 1 of the WHPP be presented to the public at a public information meeting
(note: this meeting does not have to be held as a public hearing during a city council meeting). We
have assumed that John Greer of Barr will make the presentation at the public information meeting
and that the meeting will not last more than two hours. If City staff prefer to make the presentation,
Barr will provide PowerPoint slides that can be used for the presentation. This would result in a cost
reduction of $360 from our base cost.
proJect schedule,
We have assumed that our work on the Part 1 WHPP amendment will be completed within 120 days
of notice to proceed, not counting MDH or City review periods.
Scoping meeting no. 1
Estimated Part 1 WHPP amendment timeline
Meeting held November 21, 2016
Consultantselection Assumed to occur'by August 31, 2017
Notice to proceed
September 1, 2017
Draft amendment submitted to MDH November 17, 2017
Preliminary review of draft amendment by N
Submittal to MDH with request for approval
Typically within 1 to 2 weeks after receipt of MDH
comments on draft amendment
Note: the time required to complete a Part 2 WHPP amendment is typically 9 to 12 months.
estimatecost
We propose to prepare your Part 1 WHPP amendment for a lump sum cost of $14,800. A cost break
down is presented in Attachment B. If you feel that budget would prevent you from selecting us, we
encourage you to contact us so that we might come to an amendable solution. Barr wants to be your
groundwater consultant and will work with you to achieve this.
project team
This project will be led from our Minneapolis office and includes team members skilled at
hydrogeology, modeling, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and water supply planning. Below are the
key Barr staff who will direct and work on your WHPP Part 1 amendment. Full resumes are presented
in Attachment A.
Role:
Principal in Charge
Role:
Project Manager,
Lead Hydrogeologist/
Groundwater
Modeler
Brian Lelllon, PE
AppliedSenior Civil Engineer
BS, Civil Engineering ; BA,
Brian LeMon will serve as principal in charge and
will ensure you receive quality work. He has over
32 years of experience in the fields of municipal
engineering, water system planning and analysis,
and well design. He also has expertise in the areas
of wastewater collection; water, stormwater, and
sewage pumping -station design; storm -sewer
design; combined -sewer separation projects; and
industrial engineering, site design, residential
streets, and related structures. Rate: $175/hr
John Greer, PG
Senior Hydrogeologist
MSS, Geophysics; BS, Physics & Earth Science
John Greer will have day-to-day responsibility to
ensure the project is performed correctly, on time,
and on budget, and is consistent with MDH
requirements. He will also be responsible for
coordinating with City staff. John is a licensed
professional geologist in Minnesota with over 30
years of experience including hydrogeologic site
investigations at a wide variety of sites and
hydrogeologic settings, groundwater modeling
for numerous WHPA delineation and other
studies, development of multiple Part 2 wellhead
protection plans, conducting water -supply and
well field siting studies, borehole and surface
geophysics, and geologic mapping. Rate: $180/hr
Role:
Hydrologist/
Groundwater Modeler
Role:
Hydrogeologist/
Groundwater Modeler
GroundwaterAdam Janzen, PE
. ...
MS and BS, Civil and Environmental Engineeril
Adam Jansen will work with John Greer on the WHPA and DWSMA
delineations and WHPP preparation. He and John have worked together on
numerous Part 1 WHPPs along with other studies. Adam also has experience
in hydrogeologic field methods, groundwater flow modeling for multiple
projects other than WHPA delineations including well field siting and water
supply source evaluations, aquifer characterization, and monitoring -well
installation as well as a background in numerical model development in C++.
Rate: $125/hr
Ryan Conway
Hydrogeologist
MS, Geoengineerings BS, Geology & Geoengineering
Ryan Conway will assist John Greer and Adam Jansen with the WHPA and
DWSMA delineations and Part 1 WHPP amendment report preparation. He
has experience with groundwater modeling, hydrogeologic field methods,
and geophysical surveys. Rate: $75/hr
related expert'enc.e
The work identified below demonstrates Barr's experience on wellhead protection plans, both
original plans and amendments, as well as modeling experience in hydrogeologic settings similar to
that of Mound. Additional project examples are available upon request.
Barr -prepared wellhead protection plans
1 MDH approved
2 Pending MDH approval
3 Pending MDH preliminary review
4 Currently in progress
city of Victoria
Barr performed a well field siting groundwater modeling study for the City of Victoria. The
groundwater model used for the study was based on Metro Model 3. The hydraulic conductivity
distribution in the vicinity of Victoria was adjusted to better represent smaller scale changes in
aquifer materials that could not be well represented at the scale of Metro Model 3. The updated
model was used to evaluate multiple locations for new water supply wells.
City of Chanhassen
Barr completed the amendment of Parts 1 and 2 of Chanhassen's WHPP (2011, and 2012,
respectively). For the Part 1 amendment, adjustments were made to hydraulic conductivity zones in
Metro Model 2 in the vicinity of Chanhassen and to Chanhassen municipal well pumping rates. The
updated model was used to delineate the 1 -year and 10 -year porous media time of travel zones
around the Chanhassen wells. Fracture flow evaluations were required for several of Chanhassen's
wells. The composite WHPA was delineated by combining the porous media and fracture flow
evaluations. Sensitivity analysis, DWSMA delineation, and well and aquifer vulnerability assessments
were also completed.
City Oi log a
Barr prepared the original Parts 1 and 2 of the Eagan WHPP. We completed the amendment of Part 1
of Eagan's WHPP in 2012 and the amendment of Part 2 in 2014. For the Part 1 amendment,
adjustments were made to hydraulic conductivity zones in Metro Model 2 in the vicinity of the Eagan.
Pumping rates for the Eagan municipal wells were updated, and the 1 -year and 10 -year porous
media time of travel zones around the Eagan wells were delineated using the updated model.
Fracture flow evaluations were required for all the Eagan wells open to the Prairie du Chien Group
and/or Jordan Sandstone aquifers. The composite WHPAs were delineated by combining the porous
media and fracture flow evaluations. Sensitivity analysis, DWSMA delineations, and well and aquifer
vulnerability assessments were also completed.
City of Lakeville
Barr completed the amendment of Part 1 of Lakeville's WHPP in 2012 and the amendment of Part 2
in 2014. For the Part 1 amendment, adjustments were made to hydraulic conductivity zones in Metro
Model 2 in the vicinity of the Lakeville and to pumping rates for the City's wells and other nearby
wells. The updated model was used to delineate the 1 -year and 10 -year porous media time of travel
zones around the Lakeville wells were delineated using the updated model. Fracture flow evaluations
were required for the Lakeville wells open to the Prairie du Chien Group and Jordan Sandstone
aquifers. The composite WHPAs were delineated by combining the porous media and fracture flow
evaluations. Sensitivity analysis, DWSMA delineation and well and aquifer vulnerability assessments
were also completed.
This page intentionally left blank
-2584-
attachment A.,
resumes
Experience Brian LeMon has 30 years of experience in the fields of municipal and industrial
engineering and pumping system design. He has also worked extensively on projects
involving pumping systems including water, stormwater, and sewage pumping stations;
screen design for wells, water -system analysis; water -tower and storm -sewer design;
combined sewer separation; and design for wastewater collection projects and residential
streets. Key examples of his experience include:
® Principal -in -Charge for Wellhead Protection Plan or Plan amendment development for
the Minnesota cities of Andover, Bemidji, Blaine, Bloomington, Brooklyn Park,
Chanhassen, Coon Rapids, Farmington, Isanti, Lakeville, Newport, North Branch,
Otsego, Owatonna, Plainview, Plainview, Prior Lake, Rosemount, St. Charles,
Savage, and Wyoming.
Project manager and engineer for seven new water supply wells and approximately
one mile of raw -water transmission main of various diameters up to 24 inches for the
city of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. Five of these wells were developed in the Franconia -
Ironton -Galesville aquifer.
Prepared an alternative water -supply analysis and study for the Joint Water
Commission of the Minnesota cities of New Hope, Golden Valley, and Crystal to assess
the possibility of supplying their own water rather than continuing to purchase it. The
study included computer modeling to analyze the impact of sources on elevated and
ground storage locations and resulted in recommendations regarding source and
storage locations and distribution improvements as well as rate structures.
• Prepared the alternate water source study for the city of Savage, Minnesota, when it
was determined that a protected wetland (calcareous fen) might be injured by
pumping from the city's wells. The study recommended a new source of water that
would supply the city while still protecting the fen.
• Analyzed the water system for the city of Savage, Minnesota, and wrote the water
system plan update. The analysis was performed by using a computer model, with the
resulting study recommending preliminary water tower locations and other
construction needed to provide residents with adequate fire protection and water
supply over the next 20 years.
• Project manager of the fen management plan for the city of Savage, Minnesota. The
project included location of a new water source for the city that would not endanger a
rare, sensitive wetland.
® Analyzed the water system for the city of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, and wrote the
Mendota Heights water system study. Part of the analysis was performed with a
computer model. The resulting study recommended trunk main construction to
improve fire protection and water supply.
• Analyzed the water system for the city of Fridley, Minnesota, and co -wrote the report
on the water system study. Part of the analysis was performed by using a computer
model to recommend preliminary locations for two water towers, as well as other
construction, to provide residents with fire protection and water supply over the next
20 years.
• Project manager and/or engineer for eight new and three rehabilitated water -supply
wells in the city of Lakeville, Minnesota.
® Project engineer and designer for the rehabilitation of Wells 1 and 2 and installation of
new Wells 4, 5 and 6 in the city of Bemidji, Minnesota. The rehabilitation involved the
abandonment of two existing sand -pumping wells and the drilling of two new wells to
replace them.
® Siting and design of a new 1.5 -million -gallon water tower constructed in the city of
Fridley, Minnesota, at a cost of $1.2 million. Also assisted in the rehabilitation design
for the existing half -million -gallon water tower that included an altitude valve and
vault required for the system to operate properly in conjunction with the new 1.5 -
million -gallon water tower.
® Analyzed the water system for the city of Owatonna, Minnesota, with a computer
model. Results were used to design water system improvements.
® Assisted in the design of a well rehabilitation project for the city of Savage, Minnesota.
Project included doubling the production rate of one well and the repair of two other
wells.
Primary designer for the central pumping station in Owatonna, Minnesota, that
included the rehabilitation of one well, the ground storage reservoir, and a new high -
service pumping station.
Assisted in the design of a new raw -water supply plant for the city of Askov,
Minnesota. System included two new Hinkley wells, a wellhouse, and approximately
two miles of raw -water main.
® Task manager and lead designer for the detailed design of the Devils Lake outlet
pump station, which consists of 10 pumps with a total station capacity of 300 cubic
feet per second at 220 feet TDH. The project also involved specifying an automated
raking system to clean the intake screens of debris form the incoming flow. This
project was performed for the St. Paul District Corps of Engineers.
® Project manager and lead designer for the Eagle Bend flood -control pump station,
which consists of three pumps with a total station capacity of 100 cubic feet per
second at 18 feet TDH. The station also incorporates a manually cleaned bar screen.
This project was performed for the St. Paul District Corps of Engineers.
® Designer for 10,000 -gallon -per -minute pump station at Minnesota Power's Laskin
Energy Center ash pond. The pump station consists of four double -suction line -shaft
vertical pumps in a trench -well configuration.
Project manager and lead engineer for the Rose Coulee pump station feasibility study,
which consisted of sizing and performing preliminary design of a large stormwater
pumping station that, when constructed, will be part of a significant flood -protection
system for the city of Fargo. The station will include up to four 225-cfs pumps at 800
hose power each, as well as several screening systems to prevent debris from entering
the pumps.
® Project manager for a Lakeville lift station rehabilitation project involving the
installation of new pumps, piping, and valves in four municipal lift stations.
Project manager for the replacement of Lakeville lift station 7, a three -pump station
with each pump operating at 1,200 gpm at 77 feet TDH. The project also involved
abandoning an existing lift station in place.
® Project manager and designer for a well collection system in Marshall, Minnesota, for
Minnesota Corn Processors. The project involved over 10 miles of HDPE well collection
pipe, valves, the control system, five well pumps and associated permitting.
Education BA, Applied Science, Bethel College, 1984
BS, Civil Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, 1984
Registration Civil Engineer: Minnesota
Affiliations American Water Works Association
Minnesota Ground Water Association
Experience John Greer expertise includes groundwater flow modeling; hydrogeologic site evaluation;
high-capacity well -field evaluation and siting, aquifer testing, dewatering assessments;
assessment of surface-water/groundwater interaction; solute transport evaluations; and
managing complex hydrogeologic evaluations. John's modeling experience includes
MODFLOW, FEFLOW, MODFLOWP, PEST, SLAEM, MLAEM, TimML, TTim, and aquifer test
analysis tools. He has familiarity with MODFLOW-Surfact, MPNEID, MT3D, and MYGRT.
Additional expertise includes borehole and surface geophysics, GIS applications;
groundwater remediation; and monitoring network design. He is HAZWOPER AND MSHA
safety trained. His experience includes work for industrial, power, government, and
mining clients. Relevant examples of his experience at Barr include:
® Serving as project manager and lead hydrogeologist/groundwater modeler for the
development of wellhead protection plans for the cities of Andover, Bemidji, Blaine,
Bloomington, Brooklyn Park, Chanhassen, Coon Rapids, Eagan, Faribault, Farmington,
Goodview, Hastings, Isanti, Lakeville, Mounds View, New Brighton, Newport, North
Branch, Otsego, Owatonna, Plainview, Prior Lake, Red Wing, Rosemount, Savage, St.
Charles, Winona, Woodbury, and Wyoming in Minnesota.
Performing a water source investigation for immediate location of new water supply
wells for the City of Prior Lake, Minnesota, to provide long term direction for ultimate
build -out of the city's water supply system. Involved extensive groundwater modeling
using MODFLOW to evaluate well pumping rates, potential well interference issues,
and potential impacts to a calcareous fen and planning for an extended aquifer test to
evaluate the effects of additional pumping on the calcareous fen.
® Serving as lead hydrogeologist/groundwater modeler for a water source investigation
for Credit River Township and the City of Savage, Minnesota, to identify potential
locations for new water supply wells. Included groundwater modeling using
MODFLOW to evaluate well field locations, well pumping rates, potential for well
interference, and potential for impacts to sensitive ecological resources.
® Serving as project manager and lead hydrogeologist/groundwater modeler for
hydrogeologic evaluation of a proposed new municipal well field for the City of Blaine,
Minnesota. The project followed a phased approach and, to date, has included
evaluation of available hydrogeologic data groundwater flow modeling (MODFLOW)
to evaluate the effect of pumping on wetlands and fens in the area and the potential
for well interference resulting from pumping in the proposed well field. Aquifer testing
for the proposed well field is planned for 2014.
• Serving as project manager and lead hydrogeologist/groundwater modeler for
hydrogeologic evaluations of Quaternary sand and gravel and Cambrian bedrock
aquifers for the City of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. Projects have included
hydrogeologic data evaluation, groundwater flow modeling (MODFLOW), evaluation
of the effect of municipal well pumping on surface water bodies, and assessing
feasibility of a proposed new well field site.
• Serving as project manager and lead hydrogeologist for a water supply investigation
for a new gas-fired power plant in southern Minnesota. Included a seismic reflection
survey, a drilling program to identify extent and characteristics of potential source
aquifers, a large-scale aquifer test of an alternative well field site, and public meetings.
Serving as lead hydrogeologist and groundwater modeler for an evaluation of water
supply options for a proposed new gas-fired power plant in east -central Minnesota
that was part of a larger evaluation of permitting issues. Included evaluation of
existing hydrogeologic data; groundwater modeling (using MODFLOW) to evaluate
various water supply options, and identification of the most feasible alternatives.
Directing a study to evaluate the feasibility of proposed aquifer storage and recovery
in the State of Washington. The proposed project consisted of pumping water from
the Columbia River via Ranney wells and injecting the water into a shallow sand and
gravel aquifer to store the water for later recovery during times when pumping of
water from the river would be restricted due to fishery regulations. A MODFLOW
groundwater model was prepared for this study.
Directing a study to evaluate aquifer recharge via injection of ultra -clean wastewater
treatment plant effluent into the vadose zone for a confidential client.
• Serving as lead hydrogeologist for a large-scale aquifer test in Golden Valley,
Minnesota, to determine the aquifer characteristics in a potential well field and to
evaluate the potential well for well interference as part of evaluating potential sites for
a municipal well field that could be developed by the Joint Water Commission (a joint
powers board tasked with providing the municipal water supplies for the cities of
Golden Valley, Crystal, and New Hope).
® Serving as project manager for the assessment of the effect of aquifer recharge via
infiltration of wastewater treatment plant effluent in East Bethel, Minnesota. Included
development and calibration (using PEST) of a local -scale groundwater flow model
(MODFLOW).
® Using MODFLOW and other hydrogeologic assessment tools to evaluate dewatering
at various sites.
Education MS, Geology (Emphasis: Geophysics), Arizona State University, 1986
BS, Physics and Earth Science, University of Notre Dame, 1983
Registration Licensed Professional Geologist Alaska, Indiana, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire,
Washington, Wisconsin
Licensed Professional Hydrogeologist: Washington
Certified Professional Geologist, American Institute of Professional Geologists)
Affiliations American Geophysical Union
Geological Society of America
Minnesota Ground Water Association
National Ground Water Association
Experience
Adam Janzen joined Barr in 2011 with a master's degree in civil and environmental engineering and
experience in hydrogeologic field methods and subsurface flow modeling. He has groundwater modeling
experience with MODFLOW, Groundwater Vistas, and AQTESOLV, and a background in numerical model
development in C++. Examples of Adam's experience include:
® Assisting with the Wellhead Protection Area delineation, Drinking Water Supply Management Area
delineation, and aquifer and well vulnerability assessments for the Part 1 Wellhead Protection Plan or
Plan amendment for the cities of Andover, Blaine Bloomington, Brooklyn Park, Coon Rapids, Eagan,
Farmington, Newport, Otsego, Prior Lake, Red Wing, and St. Charles, Minnesota.
® Conducting and analyzing aquifer tests to determine aquifer hydraulic properties for groundwater
model calibration as part of a waterworks capacity expansion project for the Des Moines Water
Works.
• Conducting and analyzing an aquifer test to determine the sustainable yield of a water treatment
plant supply well at PolyMet Mining's proposed mine in Hoyt Lakes, Minnesota.
® Conducting and analyzing an aquifer test to support dewatering system design for the Minneapolis
water works facility in Columbia Heights.
• Developing and calibrating a groundwater model to assess the hydrogeological impacts of a
proposed quarry expansion in Olmsted County, Minnesota.
• Developing a groundwater model to help design a cutoff wall extension to reduce the seepage
around one end of Foote Dam in Iosco County, Michigan.
• Performing a geostatistical analysis of sampling data from an oil sands tailings basin in Alberta,
Canada. Programmed an analysis routine that used the geostatistics package SGeMS and the
parameter optimization package PEST to optimize sampling locations within the basin.
• Developing a highly efficient, vertically integrated numerical analysis package for simulating
geological CO2 storage for an environmental consulting firm based in Rosemount, Minnesota. Ran
predictive simulations of CO2 storage operations using this software for operators of current and
proposed CO2 storage sites.
Serving as a research assistant for the Kansas Geological Survey. Explored a new method for
pneumatic slug testing in wells screened across the water table and field-tested Geoprobe Systems'
prototype direct -push permeameter.
Serving as a hydrologic technician for the U.S. Geological Survey in Urbana, Illinois. Collected
groundwater samples from domestic, monitoring, and municipal wells as part of the National Water
Quality Assessment Program.
Education
MS, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, 2010
BS, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois, 2008
Experience Ryan recentlyjoined Barr with a master's degree in geoengineering from the University of
Minnesota and experience with hydrogeological and geotechnical field -data collection,
processing, and analysis and groundwater modeling, including analytical element
modeling and contaminant transport modeling. At Barr Ryan has worked with MODFLOW
and MODPATH to assist in modeling projects related to mining, municipal supply, and
remediation. His experience includes:
■ Groundwater flow model development and analysis using Groundwater Vistas, Surfer,
and Arcmap.
■ Unsaturated and surface flow modeling using VS2DH and HEC -HMS.
■ Aquifer test analysis and design using AQTESOLV.
■ Evaluation of various dewatering scenarios for lake level control using limited site-
specific data. Modeled potential well and drain field configurations using AQTESOLV
and MODFLOW.
■ Assisting in the calibration of a groundwater flow model for a mining site using PEST.
■ Modeling various pumping scenarios for municipal well fields to evaluate long term
and transient viability.
■ Development of geologic models to form the framework for groundwater flow models
for mining projects.
■ Use of PEST to perform uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of groundwater flow
models for mining and municipal supply.
■ Development of scripts for automated and complex processing of model inputs and
results.
■ Environmental and geotechnical site investigation including drilling oversite,
groundwater, soil, and soil vapor sample collection and LNAPL bailing and
transmissivity determination
■ Coursework in groundwater mechanics and groundwater modeling based on the
analytical element method. Topics covered included capture zone delineation,
transient pumping simulations, and multi -layer modeling. The coarse included
modeling problems taken from local engineering projects including construction
dewatering at the Minneapolis International Airport, maximum transient pumping
analysis for a municipal well field, and contaminant capture at a multilayer brown field
site.
® Working as part of a graduate research team to implement an interactive, web -based
analytical element groundwater model of White Bear Lake. The model allowed users to
adjust pumping rates, precipitation and other parameters and explore the effects on
lake levels.
■ Conducting research on nondestructive testing using various geophysical methods as
a graduate research assistant at the University of Minnesota. Managed research team
and worked with professors and the Minnesota Department of Transportation to
perform statistical analysis of data, plan surveys, create documentation, and process
data with Excel and MATLAB.
Developing a MATLAB-based program to determine the change in vertical groundwater
flux through time in streambed sediments in a sulfide -impacted wetland using VS2DH as
a research assistant at the University of Minnesota.
Serving as an operations and remediation intern for a firm in Minneapolis. Worked as
an operations and remediation intern assisting in hydrogeologic investigation of
contaminated sites. Assisted with soil, groundwater, soil vapor, and other data
collection and analysis. Assisted with design of remediation and compliance systems.
Specialized in LNAPL transmissivity determination.
Serving as an environmental affairs intern for Unimin Corporation. Worked on silica
sand mine environmental permitting and compliance. Assisted in the collection,
analysis, and presentation of hydrogeological, water quality, habitat, air quality, and
other data for permitting and compliance purposes. Performed regular SPCC, SWPPP,
NPDES/SDS and EPA Method 22 inspections. Assisted in the implementation of a
wireless data logger system for wetland monitoring wells.
Working with research team at University of Wisconsin -Eau Claire to determine the
depth to bedrock at a contaminated site to aid in remediation effort. Used well and
map data to plan geophysical surveys and implemented gravity and seismic surveys
over site. Performed data processing and interpretation.
Education MS, Geoengineering, University of Minnesota -Twin Cities, 2016
B.Geo.E, Geoengineering, University of Minnesota -Twin Cities, 2015
BS, Geology, University of Wisconsin -Eau Claire, 2015
Training HAZWOPER 40 -hour training and 8 -hour refresher
Certification Engineer in Training: Minnesota
First Response/AED/CPR certification
Presentations Conway, Ryan J.; Lindberg, Travis R.; Grote, Katherine, R. 2014. "Geophysical Investigation
of Bedrock Depth at the WRR Superfund Site in Eau Claire, WI." Presented at the 2014
North Central GSA Conference. Lincoln, NE.
attachment B:
cost breakout
PROFESSIONAL GROUND -WATER AND
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
8 PINE TREE DRIVE
SUITE 250
ST. PAUL, MN 55112
(651)490-1405
FAX (651) 490-1006
June 23 2017
Daniel L Faulkner P.E.
Senior Project Manager
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
2638 Shadow Lane
Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318-1172
Re: Proposal
Part 1 Wellhead Protection Plan Services
City of Mound, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Faulkner,
Leggette, Brashears & Graham, Inc. (LBG) has prepared this proposal for assisting Bolton &
Menk, Inc. (BMI) and City of Mound (City) with amending Part 1 of the City's Wellhead
Protection (WHP) Plan. The proposal is based on our review of the existing Part 1 WHP Plan
and available hydrogeologic information, the Minnesota Department of Health's (MDH)
December 2, 2016 scoping letter, and LBG's completion of more than 40 Part 1 WHP Plans in
Minnesota, including several near Mound with similar hydrogeologic conditions.
LBG proposes to complete the following tasks to address MDH's requirements, and to meet
Minnesota Rules, parts 4720.5500 to 4720.5510 for delineating the WHP areas:
Task l: Assemble Data Elements
This task involves gathering and reviewing the available information necessary to amend the
Part 1 WHP Plan. Much of the information required by MDH for the pre -delineation meeting,
developing the conceptual hydrogeologic model and setting up the flow model, and delineating
the WHP Areas (WHPA) and Drinking water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) is available
as part of the existing Part 1 WHP Plan.
Task 2: Delineate WHPA and DWSMA
Following completion of Task 1, LBG will schedule the required pre -delineation meeting
with the MDH to discuss the hydrogeologic information from Task 1 and the groundwater
modeling approach. LBG will refine the conceptual hydrogeologic model and use the
groundwater model code MODFLOW to delineate the required time -of -travel capture zones used
to determine the WHP Areas for the City wells. Pumping rates applied to each well will be based
on either the maximum daily volume determined from either: 1) the previous 5 years; or, 2) the
projected annual pumping over the next 5 years.
-2596-
LOUISIANA • MISSOURI • ILLINOIS ® SOUTH DAKOTA o FLORIDA • OHIO • NEW JERSEY • PENNSYLVANIA ® TEXAS
MASSACHUSETTS • WISCONSIN • NEW YORK • CONNECTICUT
Dan Faulkner 2 June 23, 2017
Following delineation of the WHPA, LBG will work with BMI, MDH, and the City in
delineating the boundaries of the DWSMA. The DWSMA includes the surface and subsurface
area surrounding the wells and follows the WHPA as closely as possible in accordance with MR
4720.5205, subpart 3. At this time, we are assuming fracture flow and conjunctive delineations
will not be required by the MDH.
Task 3: Assess Well Field and DWSMA Vulnerability
LBG will complete the vulnerability assessment within the DWSMA in accordance with
MR 4720.5210. The assessment will follow the MDH's guidance document, Assessing Well and
Aquifer Vulnerability for Wellhead Protection.
The assessment will include a review of the well construction details to evaluate individual
well vulnerability. LBG will evaluate the data from the existing part 1 WHP Plan, and Tasks 1
and 2 to assess the vulnerability of aquifers underlying the DWSMA. This will include review of
geologic logs, hydrogeologic cross sections and maps, and existing groundwater chemistry data.
Task 4: Complete Deliverables
Following completion of the above tasks, LBG will prepare a draft report. The report will
include the conceptual hydrogeologic model, model input and the results used to delineate the
WHPAs, DWSMA, and well and aquifer vulnerability assessments.
After review of the draft a final report will be prepared which incorporates comments
received from the BMI, the City, and MDH staff. Supporting data files that are project -specific
and required by the MDH will be delivered.
Task 5: Attend Project Meeting
LBG is assuming one meeting at the MDH will be required during the project for the pre -
delineation meeting. If other meetings are necessary at critical times during the project, LBG
will notify BMI. Less critical meetings and progress updates will be held via telephone and e-
mail to reduce project costs while insuring the Part 1 WHP Plan objectives are met.
04 .11 1 37i171
Following authorization from the BMI or the City, LBG can begin work immediately and
estimates the project can be completed in 120 days.
The estimated cost to complete Task 1 through 5 is summarized below.
Task
Cost
1. Assemble Necessary Data Elements
$1,500
2. Delineate WHP Areas and DWSMA
$11,000
3. Assess Well Field and DWSMA Vulnerability
$2,000
4. Complete Deliverables
$5,000
5. Attend Project Meeting (I meeting)
$500
TOTAL
$20,000
-2597-
Dan Faulkner
June 23, 2017
Project costs may vary depending on the MDH requirements that cannot be determined until
the pre -delineation meeting is held. LBG will discuss any additional costs that could exceed the
estimated budget before proceeding.
Thank you for the opportunity and LBG looks forward to working with BMI and City on this
project. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please call me at (651) 558-9207,
Sincerely,
LEGGETTE, BRASHEARS & GRAHAM, INC
David S. Hume, PG
Senior Associate
Reviewed by:
\J
J. Kevin Powers, PG
Senior Vice President
DSH
S:\MARKET\PROPOSAL\B&M\B& M Mound WHP Amend\proposal.doc
SWOT -01
-
Protecting, maintaining and inip oving the health of all Minnesotans
July 13, 2017
Mr. Eric Hoversten, City Manager, Director of Public Works
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Dear Mr. Hoversten:
Subject: Scoping Decision Notice No. 1 for the City of Mound PWSID 1270038, for Amending the
Wellhead Protection Plan
This letter provides notice of the results of the Scoping 1 meeting that I and John Freitag (Minnesota
Department of Health) held with you and Dan Faulkner (Bolton & Menk) on November 21, 2016,
regarding wellhead protection planning. During the meeting, we discussed the preparation of Part I
of a Wellhead Protection Plan that will document the 1) delineation of a wellhead protection area, 2)
delineation of a drinking water supply management area, and 3) assessments of well and aquifer
vulnerability related to these areas for the primary water supply wells used by the city of Mound.
The wellhead protection area is the surface and subsurface area surrounding your public water
supply wells through which contaminants are likely to move and affect your drinking water supply.
The drinking water supply management area is the area delineated using identifiable landmarks that
reflect the wellhead protection area boundaries as closely as possible.
According to the state wellhead protection rule, the city will have until June 11, 2019, to submit the
amendment of its entire Wellhead Protection Plan, Part I and Part 11. As we discussed, the rule
describes the criteria used for determining the time period for completion of the Wellhead Protection
Plan (Minnesota Rules, part 4720.5130). The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) highly
recommends that half of the time allotted be dedicated to completing Part 11 of the plan.
It is our understanding that you will be contracting a consultant to prepare the delineations and
vulnerability assessments for the city for amending its Wellhead Protection Plan. MDH has a draft
Request for Proposal (RFP) that can be used to help select a consultant that has experience in
wellhead protection planning and, in particular, with preparing a Part I report. Please contact me at
the phone number below if you want to discuss using the draft RFP.
General Information: 651-201-5000 ®_loll-frreC`e: 888-345-0823 ® wwwhealth.state.mn.us
An equal opportunity employer
Mr. Eric Hoversten
Page 2
July 13, 2017
At our meeting, we discussed rule requirements and the types of information needed to amend the
Part 1 report. The Wellhead Protection Plan must be prepared in accordance with Minnesota Rules,
parts 4720.5100 to 4720.5590. General wellhead protection requirements and criteria for delineating
the wellhead protection area and data reporting are presented in Minnesota Rules, parts 4720.5500
to 4720.5510.
The enclosed Scoping Decision Notice No. 1 formally identifies the information the city must provide
to MDH to meet rule requirements for amending and preparing Part I of the Wellhead Protection
Plan. The wellhead rule refers to the existing information required for wellhead planning as data
elements. Much of this information is available in the public domain, as described in the Scoping
Decision Notice No. 1 form.
You only need to provide the information that is not in the public domain and, therefore, not
available to MDH. The Scoping Decision Notice No. 1 form also 1) lists the Minnesota unique well
number and well construction for each well that will be included in the Wellhead Protection Plan
[Table 1]; 2) lists the pumping volumes for each well [Table 2]; and 3) includes a map of the well
locations. A summary of the information the city needs to provide is included at the end of the
Scoping Decision Notice No. 1 form.
After your consultant has had an opportunity to develop a conceptual model of the local
hydrogeologic setting, we would like to meet with your consultant to discuss the proposed
delineation approach. This pre -delineation meeting may be accomplished by a conference call if 1)
MDH approves and 2) the consultant provides figures for the discussion beforehand. The porous
media delineation could be performed using Metro Model 2 or Metro Model 3 that Barr Engineering
developed for the Metro Council. Local detail and/or new information should be added as required
and recalibration should be verified to reflect the hydrogeological conditions near the city wells. A
fracture flow delineation is required for Mound Well 3.
if the vulnerability analysis shows that there are highly vulnerable areas within the DWSMA, then the
need for including a conjunctive delineation should also be assessed.
Prior to finalizing the wellhead protection area boundaries, we highly recommend that we informally
review preliminary model results and assess whether any changes are needed to meet rule
requirements. Model input and solution files should be submitted in electronic form. The same
applies to geographical data, such as the wellhead protection area and drinking water supply
management area. When geographic data are submitted electronically, Arclnfo export or ArcView
shapefile formats are preferred. It will greatly accelerate our review if these geographic data use the
1983 North American Datum (NAD83), Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 15 North (UTM, Z15N)
projection, with meter distance units. Other datum and projection systems are acceptable as long as
they are documented. Specific questions regarding electronic geographic data can be directed to
Michael Baker, Source Water Protection Unit, at (651) 201-4651.
-2600-
Mr. Eric HoverstOn
Page "
July ]3L2O17
Finally, it is our undet8tandingth at you will serve offid a lly. as the wellhead protect -ion manager- on
behalf oƒthe city. You are responsible for providing written notice tolocal units, ofgovernment ofthe
city's intent to amend the Wellhead Protection Plan, as required by the well - head protection rule
(part 4�2-O.530O,sUbpart0). Acopy ofthis,hot|ca'sh0uldbeforwarded tuK4DHand must include a
U5t�fthe cih/8wells, their unique well nunlbers., and contact infornl�tiokforyou asWellhead
Protection manager. If you do not. have -a copy of . your original notice from your previous WHP Plan,
your Source Vy�t6rProtection Unit P/anner., John Frd}tag,can provide you with �omeexamples ofthe
notification ofintent that other coroDlunitieshave used. Please contact hirDat/6SI\2U1�46G8'
|nclosing, vvelook forward toworking with you onamending your WellheadProtection Nan. if you
have any questions regarding our comments, please contact me at (651) 201-4577 or at
Sincerely, '
Source Water Protection. Unit
Environmental Health Division.
P,Ci 8(x 64875
St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-087S
AMDzds b
5.nclosures/ Scoping Decision Notice No. 1� Summary of Data Req Tqble 1 ~ Pub[ic Water
SuWell Information; FroU?PVVSWells;
TOla8-Permitted High -Ca p��bv\��1|�iK��pu�f\��||�n��iVDo
cc: John Freitag� SdU�coVyater Protection Unit, Metro Office
�,O-gnFaUlkngr, BoboD8\.Menk
Ron St'usy, K8inO85VtJ Department OfAgriculture .
SCOPING DECISION !'
(Nonvulnerable Setting)
The purpose for the first Scoping Meeting, as required by Minnesota Rules, part 4720.53 10, is to
discuss the information necessary for preparing a Part I Report of a Wellhead Protection Plan. The
Part I Report identifies the area that provides the source of drinking water for the public water supply
(PWS) so that the PWS can develop land use or management practices to protect their groundwater
resource from contamination. Specifically, the Part I Report documents the delineation of the wellhead
protection area ()AHPA), the delineation of the drinking water supply management area (DWSMA),
and assesses the vulnerability of the PWS well and DWSMA.
The wellhead rule (Minnesota Rules, part 4720.5310) refers to the information required for wellhead
planning as data elements. This form lists the data elements stated in Minnesota Rules,
part 4750.5400. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) uses this form to designate which data
elements are needed to prepare the Part I Report, based on the hydrogeological setting, vulnerability of
the well, and aquifer information known at the time of the Scoping 1 Meeting.
Name of Public Wafer Supply
Date
City of Mound (PWSID = 1270038
July 13, 2017
Name of the Wellhead Protection Manager
Mr. Eric Hoversten, City Manager, Director of Public Works
Address
City
Zip
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound
55364
Unique Well Numbers
Phone
206994 (Well 3), 699091 (Well 8)
(952) 472-0609
Instructions for Completing the Scoying No. I Form
N
D
V
S
N = If this box is checked with an "X," this data element is NOT necessary for the Part I Report of
your Wellhead Protection Plan. This data element may be identified later at the Scoping 2 Meeting
X
information for the DELINEATION of the WHPA or the DWSMA. If there is no check in the "S"
and used for the Part 2 Report. Please go to the next data element.
N
D
V
S
D = If this box is checked with an "X," the preparer of the Part I Report is required to use this
information for the DELINEATION of the WHPA or the DWSMA. If there is no check in the "S"
�
box, this information is available in the public domain or is on file at MDH.
N
D
V
S
V = If this box is checked with an "X," the preparer of the Part I Report is required to use this
information for the VULNERABILITY assessment of the PWS well or the DWSMA. If there is no
check in the "S" box, this information is available in the public domain or is on file at MDH.
N D V S S = If this box is checked with an "X," the PWS must SUBMIT the information to MDH.
A PRECIPITATION
N
D V
S
A,1: An existing map or list of local precipitation gauging stations.
Technical Assistance Comments: Precipitation values can be used to determine the local recharge in the groundwater
model. The map can be used to determine the closest gauging station. The locations of the gauging stations are available in
the public domain.
N I D I V I S I A.2: An existing table showing the average monthly and annual precipitation, in inches, for the
1WIN preceding five years.
Technical Assistance Comments: This information may be used for determining local recharge for the groundwater model.
This information may be available in the public domain if there is a local gauging station, or may be obtained from the local
wastewater treatment plant.
B.GEOLOGY
OGY
N
I D V S B.1: An existing geologic map and a description of the geology, including aquifers, confining layers,
recharge areas, discharge areas, sensitive areas as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 103H.005,
V,.; subdivision 13, and groundwater flow characteristics.
Technical Assistance Comments: Information of this type is rewired to characterize the geologic and hydrogeologic setting
of the PWS well field(s). This information is used to define aquifer geometry, location and magnitude of the recharge and
discharge areas, and groundwater flow information. Aquifer tests or alternatives listed in MN Rules, part 4720.55 10,
subpart 6, can be used to help characterize flow in the aquifer. Reference all information used to develop the conceptual
model of the geologic setting and submit to MDH only the information that is not available in the public domain.
N
D V S B.2: Existing records of the geologic materials penetrated by wells, borings, exploration test holes, or
K excavations, including those submitted to the department.
Technical Assistance Comments: information of this type may be useful to refine the understanding of the geologic and
hydrogeologic setting on a local basis. Submit only if the PWS or city has information of test drilling or site investigations
conducted by the city that is not available in the public domain.
N I
D
V I
S I
B.3: Existing borehole geophysical records from wells, borings, and exploration test holes.
Technical Assistance Comments: Information from geophysical records may provide additional information about aquifer
thickness, well construction, and water level information at a local scale. Submit only if the information is not available in the
public domain.
N
D V S B.4: Existing surface geophysical studies.
c,
Technical Assistance Comments: Information from geophysical studies may be useful to refine the understanding of the
geology on a local basis. Submit only if the information is not available in the public domain.
C. SOILS
N D V S C.1: Existing maps of the soils and a description of soil infiltration characteristics.
Technical Assistance Comments: This information is in the public domain and can be used to delineate the WHPA and
assess the vulnerability of the DWSMA because it indicates the underlying geology.
N
D
V
S
C.2: A description or an existing map of known eroding lands that are causing sedimentation
problems.
Technical Assistance Comments:
'GVVO'
D. WATER RESOURCES
N
D V S
D. 1: An existing map of the boundaries and flow directions of major watershed units and minor
watershed units.
"_
Technical Assistance Comments: This information is in the public domain and may be used to delineate the surface water
contribution area of the WHPA.
N D V S
D.2. An existing map and a list of public waters as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 103G,005,
subdivision 15, and public drainage ditches.
N
Technical Assistance Comments: This information is in the public domain and may be used to delineate the surface water
contribution area of the WHPA and determine the vulnerability of the DWSMA.
N
D
V
S
D.3: The shoreland classifications of the public waters listed under sub -item (2), pursuant to
part 6120.3000 and Minnesota Statutes, sections 103F.201 to 103F,221,
X
N
D
V
Technical Assistance Comments:
N
X
S
DA: An existing map of wetlands regulated under Chapter 8420 and Minnesota Statutes,
section 103G,221 to 103G.2373.
X
Technical Assistance Comments:
N
D
V
S
D.5: An existing map showing those areas delineated as floodplain by existing local ordinances.
11
X
1
Technical Assistance Comments:
E. LAND USE
—
N
V
E. 1: An existing map of parcel boundaries,
"_
Technical Assistance Comments: This information may be helpful in delineating the DWSMA, if available, If this
information is provided, identification numbers Must Ile provided for each parcel. An electronic lbrinat fbi- the map is
preferable,
� N V S E.2: An existing rnap of political boundaries.
X M
!i N11,
Technical Assistance Comments: Please provide this information if the boundaries have been updated/changed. This
information may tie helpful in delineafing the DWSMA. An electronic format for the map is preferable,
N
D V
S
E.3: An existing rnap of public land surveys, including township, range, and section.
NI" �
Technical Assistance Comments: This information is available in the public domain and may be helpful in delineating the
DWSMA.
N
D
V
S
EA: A map and an inventory of the current and historical agricultural, residential, commercial,
industrial, recreational, and institutional land uses and potential contaminant sources.
I
X
Technical Assistance Comments:
N I D I V
S
E.5: An existing, comprehensive land -use map.
Technical Assistance Comments:
N
D
V
S
E.6: Existing zoning map.
Technical Assistance Comments:
F. '1PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES
1'd
D I V
S
F.1: An existing map of transportation routes or corridors.
Technical
Assistance Comments: This information is available in the public domain and may be helpful in delineating the
DWSMA.
N
D V
S F.2: An existing map of storm sewers, sanitary sewers, and the public water supply systems.
Technical Assistance Comments: Do not submit a rnap Of tile storm sewers and sanitary sewers. Describe the difference in
how much water is pumped and ho.Nmuch is sold. The difference is the leakage that may be used as recharge in the
groundwater model.
D
V
S
F.3: An existing map of gas and oil pipelines used by gas and oil suppliers.
EXN
Technical Assistance Comments:
N
D V S
FA: An existing map or list of public drainage systems.
a a
Technical Assistance Comments: This information is available in the public domain and may be helpful in delineating the
DWSMA.
N
D V S F.5: An existing record of construction, maintenance, and use of the public water supply well(s) and
at t other wells within the DWSMA.
Technical Assistance Comments: If the information is different than that on -file with MDH, please provide 1) the pumping
rates for the curTent and previous years, and the projected annual pumping rates for the next five years for each well in the
PWS; and 2) well record(s) for the 13WS well(s). Information about the PWS well(s) may affect the vulnerability assessment
clue to s-chabilitation/reconstruction of a welt or changes in pumping rates.
-2606-
C. SURFACE WATER QUANTITY
ND
V S
G. 1: An existing description of high, mean, and low flaws on streams.
Technical Assistance Comments: This information is available in the public domain and may be used to determine
hydraulic connections between surface water bodies and the aquifer(s) of concern.
N S
G.2: An existing list of lakes where the state has established ordinary high water marks.
Jjjjj_�L
Technical Assistance Comments: This information is available in the public domain. The information may be used to
determine the WHPA.
N
D V S G.3: An existing list of permitted withdrawals from lakes and streams, including source, use, and
amounts withdrawn.
Technical Assistance Comments: Only required if different from the DNR database. Surface water bodies may be in direct
hydraulic connection ,,vith the aquifer(s) of concern and ,.vithdrawals may affect water levels in both the surface water and
adjacent groundwater systems.
N
D V
S
GA: An existing list of lakes and streams for which state protected levels or flows have been
established.
Technical Assistance Comments: This information is available in the public domain and may be used to determine
hydraulic connections between surface water bodies and the aquifer(s) of concern.
N
D V S G.5: An existing description of known water -use conflicts, including those caused by groundwater
t M pumping.
Technical Assistance Comments: Notify MDH of surface water/well interference problerns of which the PWS is aware.
Conflicts between use of groundwater resources and surface water bodies would indicate a hydrologic boundary that would
need to be considered in delineating the WHPA.
H. GROUNii A'ATER QUANTITY
N
D V S H.1: An existing list of wells covered by state appropriation permits, including amounts of water
appropriated, type of use, and aquifer source.
Technical
Assistance Comments: Submit this information for wells that are not permitted by the DNR because this
information
may be useful in identifying the hydrologic boundary conditions that could affect the size and shape of tile
A boundaries.vD
V S H.2: An existing description of known well interference problems and water -use conflicts.
r
nical Assistance Comments: Notify MDH ofwell interference problems of which the PWS is aware. Interference
ems with other hells, if present, likely indicatea hydrologic boundary that would need to be considered in making the
A delineation.
N D V S
H.3: An existing list of state environmental boreholes, including unique well number, aquifer
measured, years of record, and average monthly levels.
Technical Assistance Comments: OlnlV submit monthly water level measurements (with unique well numbers and dates)
that are not in the public domain.
-2606-
-2607-
, SURFACE WATER QUALITY
N D V
S
I.1: An existing map or list of the state water quality management classification for each stream and
lake.
X
Technical Assistance Comments:
N
D
V S L2: An existing summary of lake and stream water quality monitoring data, including:
1. bacteriological contamination indicators; 4. sedimentation,
2. inorganic chemicals; 5. dissolved oxygen; and
, 3. or anic chemicals; b. excessive growth or deficiency of aquatic plants.
Technical Assistance Comments: This information can be used to evaluate surface water/groundwater interactions and aquifer
water quality. Submit if the PWS has information that is not available in the public domain.
J. GROUNDWATER QUALITY
N
D V S J.1: An existing summary of water quality data, including: 1) bacteriological contamination indicators;
lr 2) inorganic chemicals; and 3) organic chemicals.
Technical Assistance Comments: Submit ift fie PWS has ini'ormation that is not available ill the public domain because the
information may help explain groundwater flow paths.
N
D V S J.2: An existing list of water chemistry and isotopic data from wells, springs, or other groundwater
sampling points.
Technical Assistance Comments: Submit if the PWS has information that is not available in the public domain because the
information may help explain groundwater flow paths.
N
D V S J.3: An existing report of groundwater tracer studies.
Technical Assistance Comments: Submit if the PWS has information that is not available in the public domain because the
itlformation may help explain gratindwater flow paths.
N
D
V S J.4: An existing site study and well water analysis of known areas of groundwater contamination.
Technical Assistance Comments: Submit if the PWS has information on contaminant sources not available in the public
tloinain because these repoirts may contain additional geologic or hydrogeologic information.
N I
D I
V
S
J.5: An existing property audit identifying contamination.
Hical Assistance Comments:
N D V S
J.6: An existing report to the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency of contaminant spills and releases.
Technical Assistance Comments: Notify MDH of reports on spills or contaminant releases that are on -file Smith the PWS or
city but are not in the public domain. These reports do not need to be submitted but MD.H staff would like to review reports.
-2607-
City of Mound
Summary of Data Request
Specific Data to be Provided to MDH by PWS
As discussed during the first Scoping Meeting on November 21, 2016, the public water supply
(PWS) will provide the following information for Part I of their Wellhead Protection Plan to the
Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). The number of the data element that refers to the
information needed to prepare the Part I Report is listed in the parenthesis at the end of each
request.
1) PWS well information: Use Tables 1 and 2, the well records for the PWS wells, and a map
showing the locations of all the PWS wells, to review the accuracy of 1) all PWS well
construction, 2) well locations, and 3) pumping information. (F.5)
Table 1 lists well use and construction for each of the PWS wells. Have you reconstructed
any wells? Are there well records for reconstructed wells?
The enclosed maps show the locations of the primary public water supply wells. Please let
us know if you feel the wells are not correctly located. These locations must be used to
delineate your wellhead protection areas.
Table 2 shows the available pumping information and indicates what information the PWS
needs to provide for the delineation of the capture zone. Please provide the 2015 pumping
volumes and the projected annual pumping amounts for the next five years for the primary
PWS wells.
2) Provide a copy of any aquifer test or specific capacity information for the PWS wells
obtained during well construction, maintenance, or repair. (B.1)
3) Is there an existing map of parcel, and/or political boundaries that could be used for defining
the Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA)? If you wish to use parcel lines,
please provide the parcel identification number for each parcel boundary along with the map.
Have the city boundaries changed? If the city boundaries have changed, please provide the
new boundaries. The boundaries of the DWSMA may be larger if political boundaries are
used instead of the parcel boundaries. (E.1 and E.2)
4) If there are private well records, soil boring reports, geophysical studies, or water level
measurements in your files that MDH staff did not identify at the scoping meeting and that
would be available for MDH staff to review and copy, please notify MDH. (13.2, 13.3, B.4,
and H.3)
5) Identify reports you have relating to leaks/contamination sites that may be of concern to your
drinking water supply, that MDH may review and copy. (3.4)
City of Mound
Summary of Data Request
Page 2
6) If your files contain water chemistry data, such as bacteria, virus, inorganic, organic, or
isotopic results from wells or other groundwater sampling points, not currently available to
MDH that MDH may review and copy, please notify MDH. (J.1 and J.2)
7) Identify reports you have in your files relating to groundwater tracer studies that have been
conducted. (J.3)
8) Provide information about other high-capacity wells in your area that may not be permitted
and are not listed on the attached Table 3. (H.1)
9) Describe any conflicts over water use the PWS has been involved with, such as 1) private
wells that went dry (or well interference) or 2) springs or wetlands that were affected. Was
the Department of Natural Resources involved in resolving the conflict? (G.5 and H.2)
10) Describe the annual amount of water lost due to leaks in the distribution system. Can you
identify specific parts of the distribution system where this loss occurs? (F.2)
11) If local precipitation information is not available in the public domain within a couple of
miles and in the same geomorphic setting, please provide average monthly precipitation
values from the wastewater treatment facility during the preceding five years. (A.2)
12) Identify any other reports about surface water withdrawals or surface water monitoring data
from lakes, streams, or wetlands that are not in the public domain that MDH staff could
review and copy. (G.3 and 1.2)
.i'
i
O ro
N
O
�
.�
CE
N
cL6
a C1
Eim
N L
C
C
C
3=
O
u O L
z
N
>
>
>
QI
z
z
.--c
z°
ro
z
C N
CU 'C
N 0
.w"
�0 �,¢QL-�
i•n
d
cU)
a)
cE�
iB
ttS O C6
CL
O
.e
�d
0
O
u
m
�
pyo
rn
rn
o
C
U
:z
_
vt4
R
Nr
'IT
CD
4-4
0 0
o
Q) O
r
M
0
Lj
0
m
NN y y
to
M
N
p _
r
co
N
M
O
O
iw
Z
qr�Q.
N
X
O
O
q
p
O
p
q
Q)
G
Z
O
M
O
O
Qi
CCS
H
CD
a�
O
M
N
0
m
C[3
E
�
f4
v
a
I-
w O
0
L
Nv
m
G IS
O
roN
d
A
O
Ncn
W
� z
N
"I
N
CDCD
CD
(D
N
CA
*
N
N
N
N
v
i
O ro
y
N � d
a C1
Eim
"a�roy
p
O
H
O
O
u O L
z
N
N
t0
U w O
QI
.--c
ro
z
Q
i•n
?
y
7
CD
0
m
�
MV)
N
N
O
vt4
R
0 0
o
a
r
M
0
Lj
0
m
0
m
Q>
o
r
O
N
O
N
co
..O
M
O
O
M
N
Z
O
O
q
p
O
p
q
Q)
G
Z
O
M
O
O
Qi
a�
O
M
N
m
a
0
roN
d
A
O
Ncn
W
O
W
(D
N
CA
c
iT
N
v
�
ro
o
C
C
�
'LS
N
r•
6
N
M
q
It
W
O
Q
ro
M
N
CN
D
ii
v
r
r
N
L
L
Q
F
:9
O
a
O
o
O
o
O
F_
r
r
N
0)
Ocli
O
Cl)
�
N
A
E
c !-
H
~
t
01 C
O
0-
6j
U
E J
w
�O
W
y
a C1
Eim
N
p
O
H
O
O
z
N
N
t0
QI
ro
z
7
?
y
7
W
P
a d
O1 E
Lo
Q 7 m O.
N
d'
N
2�.
1�-
M
N
CMO
N
([j
d'
yn
r=0p'
V
N
M
t0
N
�a
ro E
M
h
N
th
�.
<t
Iq
y 0 d %p
L
N
O(0
W
O
((D
'd'
Q }� CL
O
O
m
t
CN
w
� C D a
r-
00
00
NY
•!
N
N
N
O
u7 Q
a
jM
a
� E
lMn
N
h
N
00
U')
V'
T O
(.0
0)
0
Cl)
.O
A �
O d
d
E(0
(o
N
M
O
m
W
L6
o
r
O
o
= 4
c
CD
Q
U
U
U
U
-Z=z
U
U
U
d
o—
5
a—
C
n—
Q
Q
0
o—.o—
Q.
fAa
a
a�a=a�on.�n
CL
�E
iaCO
m0
m(n
m(n
mto
mU
mN i
a
a
o
a
iz
a
o. i
.i
U
~
�
U
tl1
LL
J
Z
7
E
U
LL
U
U4
U
(Q
O'-
N
(O
co
ZD
N
N
N
A
M
T
O(p
M
TCfl
O
O
C0
IL E
ad
❑
zz
rn
rn
O
r-0-
O
co
00Q
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
O
0
0
O
O
O
d
U
U
U
V
U
U
t4
z
U
Y
as
(cs
Q
0
U
r
O
C
C
C
G
CO
co
y
oD
LO
I
O
M
N
E
in
m
0
�z
N
O
N
M
(O
N
N
N
N
M I�I(Olt61 O
CO C',
W CID O W
0) C) O C)
N O 000 V N
-ITIOIG1
�
M 0 0 Z_ b
C C C N
y o a
.ro .co C
f R) U
m._7
' a v a
i10 o o c mCn
1 C) U G U
c
0 0 a =3
.� QQ
i Z mm Q
LLC'1 Cm'1 a
U
O Cl) V N
c(0 co m r
O W 0) O r-
0)
-
0) rn o rn
T T N T
M (o(o LO
M � O OM)
I~ N V CO N
PALO R �
N
d
E
N
N
A
O)
_C
0
n
N
cr
ui .d
o c
N m
m n
a E m
v (L
�I
� � o
Q NI
Z `I
o a
N E
O as u3i
CO O U
O 0
N W
m > m
v 6 m
W V
11 �
Co
m
Z
6
Q
v
Z
2
0
0)
O
-2614-
a
i
f 1
i
f w
to �alYtY'41��t lit tt _, � � Y
t,, ��l tY ltlt
it�;tt grata f la ��
t � ail
tt k iz
t
4{
♦ *
t ) �
1°� � tY
�l
it: ��
pit
�:
1{��
��1 'l
t
i•
tt
�
�t
dtl1. �
t r
tiA ��� YY'Y 4d tE'.s � tCtt 't S�t hYt�t t itl�g �t��lid�ttv£4
� ��1
t 1?11 J~tizl lt� 11"+tUt1�t1114
ud�^l k''fi
'h»�t11 ,td4�
i
�K .. t�.
t tat tta d` t 'l Y 1i ti d�� tit
t j�. 1 �
4� t L �,�1� t�'� alt �di�l:
Uth
Y 1tti�il lL
1i . £� ` l .,; Y fi 'd :r.. Q ":..: �� ti kit�S
g'��,tkni il@ t�ttltltti t 4�t 4 ��
ila � ft`UY�1~•.Y` � .�gi �Ut '.zl�YRl t 4�a'^ttix�wilt
�� tit �.�1�1 d `,X� � t��`4i. •\ � 'i:Ht ..
i Ali }t't14i1 i 4 lk
k .t � � � 1r•
111Y}41 � t fi 1Y' �}y
k t � t YiCs,St4`t��t����i
} � l�iY��Y'^ �vl��t�
�' i
Y a'�`Yi �a� t �Mt ('i+Y
hlt•i 0.Y0.4* 'dalt�Y t1At,�itl 111,
l�Ytti �`�1 tlt3��`tt
iSt� ���11't4�tl :lYii tit 1
to tjiitl
Y v � �,£ 9
ti;, lty'k 4� .a}14
itti Ul1G�,n
t ,fit �4t �t t S
l�
3it'1 Yiis'�1i1Y�4� 1
�1 1 t
t �it 6Y1.
�"aittkry
";
Yv i�F Kit .YY'Ai '% tilT d tk'S±gp�t i t lkl tial
t c�$a 11n4 ,�Y tt 2lt tint 1 Yti 4 � j hal. Y 1 11 i, d� vt,
�1
tt�'� del ''•`tl t'tl '�� : lYID f4 k 1� tYtrt
tt4 tlil y`1tt�VY 4y�;��G� 1`` it s, i v akY?Ld st� 11 t�l R
Ott t L
t l l f
k
, i �k t1�
`ti l`ti$ix � 11 1 ,y 1
£� 4: YM1 tk
''�
t � '�
1 tF1i1l t . �.s�,
t
C�'
`fi
�.'
iv 4K ,� }d{ l:
-2614-
!i !
! g1l I to !
PROPOSEDRESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
•
2016 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT TUXEDO
:l....! 1
WHEREAS, contracts have been let for the 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement
Project — Tuxedo Boulevard Phase Il, and the construction cost for the City portion of such
improvement is $909,000 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such
improvement amount is $308,000 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $1,217,000.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to
be $950,000 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property
owners is declared to be $267,000.
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of
fifteen (15) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday
in January, 2018, and shall bear interest at the rate of five (5) percent per annum from
the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the Consulting Engineer, shall forthwith calculate
the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every
assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in
her office for public inspection.
4. The Clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council
thereof.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of September, 2017
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
-2615-
10*10111KIN 1191050101%
PROPOSED ON
2016 STREET, UTILITY AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
LANE/MAYWOOD ROAD PW -16-03
WHEREAS, contracts have been let for the 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement
Project — Cypress Lane/Maywood Road, and the construction cost for the City portion of such
improvement is $492,000 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such
improvement amount is $208,000.00 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $700,000.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to
be $574,000 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property
owners is declared to be $126,000.
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of
fifteen (15) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday
in January, 2018, and shall bear interest at the rate of five (5) percent per annum from
the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the Consulting Engineer, shall forthwith calculate
the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every
assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in
her office for public inspection.
4. The Clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council
thereof.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of September, 2017
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
-2616-
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
PROPOSED ON
2016 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTPROJECT
BOULEVARD1
WHEREAS, contracts have been let for the 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement
Project — Bartlett Boulevard, and the construction cost for the City portion of such improvement
is $1,494,000 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement
amount is $440,000 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $1,934,000.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to
be $1,727,000 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property
owners is declared to be $207,000.
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of
fifteen (15) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday
in January, 2018, and shall bear interest at the rate of five (5) percent per annum from
the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the Consulting Engineer, shall forthwith calculate
the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every
assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash
valuation, as provided by law, and she shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in
her office for public inspection.
4. The Clerk shall upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council
thereof.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of September, 2017
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
• e r
RESOLUTION FOR ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR
2016 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT• 1!
:• 1'
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on September 12, 2017, the City Clerk was
directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining
Wall Improvement Project — Tuxedo Boulevard Phase II,
AND WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been
completed and filed in her office for public inspection,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of October, 2017, in the council chambers of city
hall, at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place
all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity
to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed
assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to
the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She
shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the
assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property,
with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Mound, except that no
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid with 30 days from the adoption
of the assessment. The property owner may at any time thereafter, pay to the City of
Mound the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31St of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be
made before November 15th or interest will be charged through December 31St of the
succeeding year.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of September, 2017.
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Nuawsamm
RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR
2016 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTPROJECT CYPRESS
LAN ••D -•
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on September 12, 2017, the City Clerk was
directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining
Wall Improvement Project — Cypress Lane/Maywood Road,
AND WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been
completed and filed in her office for public inspection,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of October, 2017, in the council chambers of city
hall, at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place
all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity
to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed
assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to
the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She
shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the
assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property,
with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Mound, except that no
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid with 30 days from the adoption
of the assessment. The property owner may at any time thereafter, pay to the City of
Mound the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 316t of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be
made before November 15th or interest will be charged through December 31 st of the
succeeding year.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of September, 2017.
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
wlwge
• •pea
RETAININGRESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR 1
2016 STREET, UTILITY AND IMPROVEMENT•!
BOULEVARDI
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on September 12, 2017, the City Clerk was
directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of the 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining
Wall Improvement Project — Bartlett Boulevard,
AND WHEREAS, the Clerk has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been
completed and filed in her office for public inspection,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 24th day of October, 2017, in the council chambers of city
hall, at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place
all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity
to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed
assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to
the hearing, and she shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. She
shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the
assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property,
with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Mound, except that no
interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid with 30 days from the adoption
of the assessment. The property owner may at any time thereafter, pay to the City of
Mound the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to
December 31St of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be
made before November 15th or interest will be charged through December 31St of the
succeeding year.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of September, 2017.
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound,
Community Development De
• 0.0
Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor Wegscheid and Members of the Mound City Council
From: Field Officer Stewart B. Simon v
Date: September 7, 2017
Consent Agenda Item 4. — Planning Case No. 17-31
Re: Expansion Permit for 2072 Shorewood Lane (PID No. 18-117-23-31-0006)
•
The applicant/ property owner, Craig Kruckeberg, has submitted an application for an
expansion permit for a home tear -down and rebuild on his property at 2072 Shorewood Lane.
The 21,061 square foot Lakeshore lot of record contains a single-family dwelling. The property
is located at the end of Shorewood Lane, at Shadywood Point, with most of the property as
Lakeshore. The applicant is proposing the demolition of the existing two-story home and
replacing it with a new home, which follows the foundation of the existing dwelling. An existing
shed standing on the eastern lot line would be removed as part of this project.
An expansion permit is needed for the following non -conforming setbacks to be expanded as
part of the new home construction:
• Side yard setback (north side) of 4.7 feet (6 feet required)
• Lakeside setback (east side) of 34 feet (50 feet required)
The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their September 5, 2017 meeting. Draft
minutes from the meeting have been prepared and follow this memo for your review. Planning
Staff clarified that the east lakeside deck would be expanded along the width of the dwelling,
thus requiring an expansion permit. Staff also reviewed previous variances granted for the
property, which allowed for the previously non -conforming setbacks to be recognized. Aaron
Thompson, representative of the applicant/owner, stated the rebuild was to accommodate
one-story living on the main floor and the applicant intended on using the existing foundation
and footprint as much as possible. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the
expansion permit with the conditions and findings as proposed by Staff.
NOTIFICATION.
Neighbors were provided written notification on September 6, 2017 that the expansion permit
request was being included on the September 12, 2017 City Council Meeting consent agenda.
RECOMMENDATION.
Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, the attached
resolution has been prepared for your consideration.
-2621-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION•
RESOLUTION APPROVING EXPANSION PERMIT FOR 2072 SHOREWOOD LAN=
PLANNING CASE •
PID • 11#
WHEREAS, the applicant, Craig Kruckeberg, has submitted an application for an
expansion permit; and
WHEREAS, the property is located in the R-1 single-family residential zoning district;
and
WHEREAS, the 21,061 square foot property includes a home that was constructed in
1935; and
WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking to demolish the existing home and replace it with a
new home following the foundation of the existing dwelling; and
WHEREAS, an expansion permit is being requested as the applicant is proposing to use
the existing north side yard and east side lakeshore setbacks, which are non-
conforming, for the new home; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested an expansion permit to allow the existing side
yard setback of 4.7 feet be extended for the length of the home within the north side
yard; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested an expansion permit to allow the existing
lakeside yard setback of 34.0 feet to be extended for the width of the home for a deck in
the east lakeside yard; and
WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-40 (a) outlines the criteria for granting an expansion
permit which is provided below:
(1) The proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering:
a. Function and aesthetics of the expansion.
b. Absence of adverse off-site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors
and dust.
c. Adequacy of off-street parking.
(2) Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are
unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other
circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this
chapter have had no control.
(3) The exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions
of the applicant.
-2622-
(4) The expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of
the neighborhood.
(5) The expansion requested is the minimum needed.
EM
WHEREAS, details regarding the requested expansion permit for the proposed project
are contained in the Planning Commission report for the September 5, 2017 meeting
and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the expansion permit subject to conditions;
and
WHEREAS, the expansion permit was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its
September 5, 2017 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of the expansion
permit as recommended by Staff; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the expansion permit request at its September
12, 2017, meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a
reasonable manner; and
WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the applications were made within the
timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and
WHEREAS, in granting approval of the expansion permit, the City Council makes the
following findings of fact:
The criteria of City Code Section 129-40 (a) are being met.
2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how
it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan.
3. The desire for a two-story home with decks is reasonable for a residential
property.
4. The side yard setback of 4.7 feet on the north side of the property is an
existing condition that will be maintained as the building is rebuilt and
expanded along the side yard.
5. The lakeside setback of 34 feet on the east side of the property is an
existing condition that will be maintained as the building is rebuilt and
expanded along the east lakeside.
NOW, THEREFORE, E IT RESOLVE® that the City Council of the City of Mound does
hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the expansion
permit for the property at 2072 Shorewood Lane, as described in Exhibit A, with the
following conditions:
-2623-
I . Post construction impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 40 percent.
Hardcover calculations will be verified as part of building permit process.
2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land
use request.
3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included
as part of this action.
4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building
permit application.
5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public
agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required
information prior to building permit issuance.
6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin
County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for
recording until all conditions have been met.
7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at
Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with
the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the
fees to be taken out of the escrow.
8. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD)
rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect.
These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority
and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council
on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the
new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the
proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver
must be provided before release of any future building permit.
BE 6T FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, the City
Council's approval of the request is based on information contained in the record
including but not limited to, the applicant's request and submitted information, the Staff
Report, and the Planning Commission's review and recommendation.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th of September, 2017.
Mark Wegscheid, Mayor
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Exhibit A
Lots 13 and 14, Block 1, "Shadywood Point", Hennepin County, Minnesota
-2625-
Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Goode,
David Pelka, Jake Saystrom, Jameson Smieja, and Jennifer Peterson. Absent: Philip Velsor. Staff
present: Consultant Planners Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Field Officer Stewart Simon,
and Secretary Jill Norlander.
Members of the public: Ray Chamberlain, 4913 Bartlett Blvd; Aaron Thompson, 2072
Shorewood La; Todd & Terri Crandall, 2320 Norwood La; Marlene Graham, 637 Harmony Cir,
Wayzata; Louis Colson, 6757 Grandview Blvd; Fritz Gullickson, 637 Harmony Cir, Wayzata.
PLANNING CASE NO. 17-31 EXPANSION PERMIT— NEW/REPLACEMENT HOUSE
2072 SHOLANE
REWOOD
APPLICANT:
Laura Chamberlain presented:
• Lakeshore property in Shadywood Point Addition
• Comprehensive Plan - Low Density Residential
• Zoning - R-1 Single Family Residential
• Existing Lot of Record
• 21,061 square feet
• Lakeshore property at the end of Shorewood
• Current home built in 1935; to be demolished and rebuilt on existing foundation
• North and east side non -conforming setbacks to be expanded
Property is In the 100 year floodplain. The majority of property is above the 931 elevation.
Applicant is filling in existing foundation crawl -space to bring slab -on -grade to be above 933.
Changes within the floodplain will need to be replaced 1:1 as regulated by MCWD.
Proposed hardcover is 7,177 square feet or 34% of lot area
Staff recommends approval with an additional condition that hardcover not to exceed 40%.
Baker requested a review of the previous variances granted for the property.
-2626-
Planning Commission Minutes
September 5, 2017
Aaron Thompson, Kasson, MN, owner's representative, stated that the owner requires one -
level living. They originally looked at adding an elevator.
Saystrom asked if they were reusing the existing foundation. Thompson replied that they
intend to as much as possible.
MOTION by Goode, second by Baker, to recommend approval of the expansion permit as
recommended by staff with conditions 1-8 and findings of fact 1-5.
Bussey added the condition that hardcover not exceed 40% as recommended by staff and also
amended findings of fact number 5 be reworded to reflect the wording of findings of fact 4.
All parties agreed to the amendments.
MOTION carried unanimously.
-2627-
rt's'. 1.6.
Planning Commission
Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Planning Consultants
Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
August 29, 2017
17-31 (Expansion Permit)
Expansion Permit
Craig Kruckeberg (Owner)
2072 Shorewood Lane (PID 18-117-23-31-0006)
September 5, 2017
Low Density Residential
R-1 Single Family Residential
The applicant/property owner, Craig Kruckeberg, has submitted an application for an expansion
permit for a home tear -down and rebuild on his property at 2072 Shorewood Lane. The 21,061
square foot lakeshore lot of record contains a single-family home. It is located at the end of
Shorewood Lane, at Shadywood Point, with most of the property as Lakeshore. The applicant is
proposing the demolition of the existing two-story home and replacing it with a new home that
follows the foundation of the existing home. The existing home has non -conforming setbacks
for the lakeside setback, as well as the side yard setback. The applicant is requesting an
expansion permit to expand the side yard to the existing setback of 4.7 feet, and the rear
lakeside setback for the porch of 34.0 feet.
City Code Section 129-40 (a) states that an expansion permit for a nonconforming structure
may be granted to provide relief to the landowner where the application of the City Code
imposes practical difficulties. In determining whether practical difficulties exist, the City Council
shall evaluate the following criteria:
(1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering:
a. function and aesthetics of the expansion.
b. absence of adverse off-site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust.
c. adequacy of off-street parking.
(2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to
the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over
which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control.
(3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the
applicant.
(4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the
neighborhood.
(5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed.
Abutting property owners per Hennepin County tax records, were sent written notice on
August 30, 2017 to inform them of the expansion permit request and that the application was
included on the September 5, 2017 Planning Commission meeting agenda for review.
Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to
approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance
with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1"
for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be August 10, 2017.
The 21,061 square foot property has an existing, two-story home that was constructed in 1935.
The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing home and rebuild utilizing the same
foundation.
As shown on the attached survey, the existing home's side yard has a setback of 4.7 feet, which
is less than the required 6.0 feet for a lot of record. An expansion permit is needed to allow for
the continuation of this side yard setback for the proposed building.
Additionally, the existing home's east -facing deck has a lakeside setback of 34.0 feet, which is
less than the required 50 -foot setback for buildings and decks on lakeshore properties. An
expansion permit is needed to allow for the continuation of this lakeside setback for the
expansion of the deck all the way along the rear of the building.
-2629-
STAFF/CONSULTANT/AGENCY REVIEW
Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for
review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have
been addressed and are, therefore, not included in this report. See additional comments which
are summarized below:
Heidi Quinn, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
A tear -down rebuild single family home at the above referenced address will require a MCWD
Erosion Control permit and possibly a Floodplain Alteration Permit. The floodplain alteration
rule will be triggered for any land disturbance below the 931.5 foot contour elevation. If there
is proposed fill within the 100 year floodplain it must be compensated for at a 1:1 ratio.
Scott Qualle, MnSpect
I have no response other than that any constriction closer than 5' from the lot line will need to be fire
protected.
» According to FEMA maps of the parcel, the entire property is located within the 100 -
year floodplain, which is 931.0 for Lake Minnetonka. The applicant's survey, however,
shows that a majority of the property is above the 100 -year floodplain elevation. The
applicant has indicated they will be requesting a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) for
the site, or portions of the site, to be removed from the floodplain.
While the applicant will be seeking an adjustment to floodplain designation for the
property, the applicant recognizes the need to meet the Regulatory Floodplain
Protection Elevation for Lake Minnetonka of 933.0. In their letter dated August 15,
2017, the applicant indicated that the existing 3' crawl space of the existing home will
be removed, and the new home will be slab -on -grade with all floors above the 933.0
foot elevation.
The lowest floor elevation of the existing home is 933.8 feet, which is higher than the
regulatory flood protection elevation for Lake Minnetonka at 933 feet.
The proposed building height is 27.5 feet which is under the maximum building height of
35 feet. This will be verified at the time of the building permit.
» The proposed hardcover for the site is 7,177 square feet, approximately 34.0% of the lot
area. As a lot of record, this is well within the 40% maximum. It is also a slight reduction
from existing hardcover, which sits at 7,238 square feet (34.4%). This will be verified at
time of the building permit review.
-2630-
The expansion of the side wall along the 4.7 foot setback will also result in the
demolition of an existing shed, which is 0.0 feet from the side lot line; overall this is a
net improvement.
Applicant is advised that there are building/code regulations related to structures
located within certain distances to property lines that limit openings/projections and
requires fire rating. The applicant or representative should contact the Building Official
to discuss the proposed project including, but not limited, to the specific requirements
related to the structure's proximity to the north lot line. See comment from Building
Official Scott Qualle in the Staff/Consultant/Agency section of the Planning Report.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approval of
the variance and the expansion permits for this site subject to the following conditions:
The applicant must maintain hardcover under the 40% maximum allowed. This will be
verified at the time of building permit review.
2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use
request.
3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part
of this action.
4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit
application.
5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency
permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to
building permit issuance.
6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County.
The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all
conditions have been met.
7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at
Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the
City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be
taken out of the escrow.
8. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules
related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are
now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was
-2631-
officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011.
Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and
applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence
from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of
any future building permit.
In recommending Staff approval of the expansion permit, the following findings of fact are
offered:
1. The criteria of City Code Section 129-40 (a) are being met.
2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is
zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing
neighborhood character.
3. The desire for a two-story home with decks is reasonable for a residential property.
4. The side yard setback of 4.7 feet is an existing condition that will be maintained as
the building is rebuilt and expanded along the side yard
5. The deck lakeside setback of 34.0 feet into the lake side setback is an existing
condition that is not being increased as a result of the proposed addition.
In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded
to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, the possible meeting date is
September 12, 2017; an alternate date is September 26, 2017.
-2632-
0
2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 553
Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620
Please twe or print legibiv
I
Case No.
SUBJECT
Address— 2072 Shorewood Lane
PROPERTY
LEGAL
Lot(s) 13 & 14
Block_ 1
DESC.
Subdivision Shad wood Point
PID #
Zoning:
R1 R1A R2 R3 61 B2 B3 (Circle one)
PROPERTY
Name Craig Kruckeberg
Email
craig0minimizer.com
OWNER
Address500Minimizer Way SE, Blooming
Prairie,
IVIN 55917
Phone Home 612-360-9936 Work
Fax
APPLICANT
Name Craig Kruckeberg
Email
C-rqiq nnininni7pr rnm
(IF OTHER
THAN
Address500Minimizer Way SE, Blooming
Prairie,
MN 55917
OWNER)
Phone Home 612-360-9936 Work
Fax
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure
for this property? Yes ( ) No (x ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s)
and provide copies of resolutions.
2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
Demo of existing two story house structure and replacement with new two story house structure using existing
fQ_0Vr
int on all shoreline areal Garage to be expanded t� the road
Expansion Permit Information
(1/10/2017) Page 4 of 6 -2633-
3. Please complete the following information related to the property and building's conformity with the
SETBACKS:zoning regulations for the district in which it is located including the expansion permit request.
REQUIRED REQUESTED EXPANSION
(or existing)
Front Yard: SW( N8EVV)
30
ft.
ft.
ft
8kje Yard: Nm( N S E VV )
ML 4.7
U.
4.7
|t
Side Yard: SE( N 8 E VV )
10
ft. 89
ft.
73
h.
Rear Yard: ( N 8 EVV )
ft.
ft.
ft,
Lakeside: (N8EVV)
ft. tL
34
V,
: /N8EVV\
ft�
fi
ft.
Street Frontage:
60
M. 30
ft.
30
ft.
Lot Size:
10000
sq ft 21061
sq ft
21081
sqft
H@nj0Ovec
8424
sqft 6812
sqft
6707
sqb
4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for
the zoning district in
which kia
located? Yes (x), No ( ). If no, specify
each non -conformity:
5. Are there exceptionalorextraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion unique t0the property such
as lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since
enactment of this chapter have no control? P|8aSS check all that apply:
( ) too narrow / )topography ( )soil
(
)too small / )drainage (* existing situation
(
)too shallow ( \shape / other: specify
Please describe:
Expansion Permit Information
(1/1O/2017)Page 5of6
-2634-
Case No.
6. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances described above created by the action of anyone
having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No (X).
If yes, explain:
7. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances created by any other person -made change, such as
the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (X). If yes, explain:
8. Are the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances for which you request an expansion permit peculiar
only to the property described in this petition? Yes (X), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which
are similarly affected?
9. Comments: The owners are replacing the house structure to allow for a main level owner suite and main level
living for possible handicap needs. The current house structure has all bedrooms on upper level.
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information
provided. i consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized
official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be required by law.
Date 9-- — 1 7
r
Applicant's Signature Date— C
Expansion Permit Information
/1 M nl7n1 T 0- P, ^f a
-2635-
he design
tonnection
RESIDE4TIAL DESIGN AND PLANNING
August 15, 2017
City of Mound — Planning Commission
c/o Sarah Smith w/Planning
RE: 2070 Shorewood Lane — Kruckeberg Lake Home
To Whom it May Concern:
We are proposing to remove the existing two story home. The new two story home will be built
in the same locations using as much as possible of the existing foundation. The location will match the
existing setback on the lake side with some expansion to the setback on the street side. The current
owner has been in contact with the one neighbor and they understand the reason to rebuilt is to get
main level living for the current owners.
The existing 3' deep crawl space will be removed and the new structure will be a slab on grade.
With this adjustment the owner will request a map amendment to FEMA to be removed from the flood
plan.
Sincerely,
Aaron Thompson
E-mail: aaron@thedesignconnection.net
The Design Connection --2636-gn With you, 2Cor 5:20
12041St Ave NE, Kasson MN 55944, Ph: 507-951-2273, Email.aaron@thedesignconnection.net
0.
HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS
• ,�� .►(IMPERVIOUS
SURFACE COVERAGE)
PROPERTY ADDESS: 2072 Shorewood Lane
OWNER'S NAME: Craig Kruckeberg
LOT AREA 21060 SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ........................................ 6318
LOT AREA 21060 SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) .......... ........ ......... - 8424
Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129-385 (see
back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official.
LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT
House 77 23 3133
HOUSE Porches 147 X 6 -
17'-0" 28'-0" 806
Garage 16'-6" X 20'-0" _
TOTALHOUSE... ......... .......................................
DETACHED BUILDINGS X -
(GARAGE/SHED)
X =
TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ..............................
DRIVEWAY, PARKING Driveway X _ 1888
AREAS, SIDEWALKS, SidewalksX - 378
ETC.
Patio Pavers X = 888
TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................--...........
DECKS Open decks (1/4" min, X =
Opening between boards) with a
pervious surface under are not X =
counted as hardcover.
X =
TOTALDECK .......................................................
X =
X =
4023
n/a
3154
n/a
TOTALOTHER ....................................................
TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. ............. ........ .............. ..... — 7177
UNDER / OVER (indicate difference).................................................................... 1247
PREPARED BY Mark Schoenfelder - Ridgeline Group Inc. DATE 08/14/2017
Revised 1/10 -2637-
Per Mound City Code, Section 129,2, building height and building line are defined as
follows:
QUIld� at«; t #.i
level at any story level of a building and representing the mInIMUM distance
which all or- any part of the building is set back from said right-of-way line or
+rdinary high water level.
Describe the type of roof style proposed- EL.I— (i.e. pitched, flat,
,r, roof,
elevation2. Provide the average grade elevation of the building line facing the stre
based on proposed grades referenced on submitfttedsurve I
3. Provide the average grade of building e facing the rear of
the lot or lake: based on proposed grades referenced on
submitted
4. Provide the average grade elevation of the building line(s): 2"', -
lowest
grade elevation to highest point of structure: —1 S
6. Provide the proposed height of the structure based on
the definitIon
of building height rsz : ,a' i'above:
ell
nnnn
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR THE DESIGN CONNECTION
OF LOTS 13 AND 14, BLOCK 1, SHADYWOOD POINT
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Bearings shown are based on Grid North of the
Hennepin County Coordinate System NAD63 (96 Ad.)
70 20 40
SCALE 7N FEET
AC
\\/\
1/2 -in Pipe \
\\\ LAKE
p `/ y �A4 f{ T ppp trrK�/�^y
�f F �E/ �7 Vl
\\ 1/2 -in Pipe
�( .1l0
D/� vaso
.PAYERS
b 09
1
/ r�Y'Kr'v
1
"'0
e z 2g Qty\ NpOl 1
\1.,• \ `I ,_, �z� a,1 e � `o.N�iS ,�\C�6 �O t `-r
t<41�
b, \ t.
-Alcy •�c+� 1 e, 4a \
F s°/
13\ x I m
1/2 -in Pipe
Tor Nur trrD ^7 � • ^sad �� OG [���� � , I � � � ,tY \
RLS 12755 ,/' ECEY<(
\ fCxlcRNv1£ � //' PAYERS
50 b -
ID OHW1 it
0 DOCK -5 tb ck I I -
WEST
14
A 1 1
Ortlino High- \ \ mi\ 7
929 4 Contour L ne NIRGPE \ I�\ PAYERS
ARM \\ /
.9 I
WATER ELEV = 929.5
EXISTING HARDCOVER AREA: dwy 30. 2017
HOUSE/GARAGE DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALKSJPAVERS TOTAL
4107 Square Feet 1828/415/888 Square Feet 7238 Square Feet
RLS 12755 \
NOTE:
Proposed Dwelling to Connect
to Existing Water and Sewer Services
Under Existing Drive
1/2 -in Pipe \
L
\
\
\
PROPOSED HARDCOVER AREA:
9295
truly
HOUSE/GARAGE DRIVEWAY/SIDEWALKS/PAVERS
TOTAL JO, 077
4242 Square Feet 1756/466/888 Square Feet
7352 Square Feet
LOT AREA: 21061+/. Square FeetPROPOSED V E �0 i rE p,ice.� INT
f
EXISTING UTILITIES
IHER 3YCERTI YTHAT THIS PLAN. SPECIFICATION
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TICKET # 172023151
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OF RECORD
OR REPORT WM PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY
DIRECT SUERVI&ON AND THAT) AMA DULY
UCEN .DPROFESSIONALSURVEYORUNDERTHE
:1TILITY NAME FACILITY TYPE STATUS
Lots Z3 and 14, Block 1, SHADYWOOD POINT
LAVJB OF-yE SATE or udNtsoTA.
CITY OF MOUND MARKED
ARKASG
tAARKA HO- FELO
"R`, hNTIER COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE CLEAR
oa*r Auoust 7, 2017 uc. Ne. 42302
CENTER POIA � RGY GAS MARKED
LEGEND
MEDIACOM LABIE MWKED
o Denotes a 314 Inch x 1b Inch Iron Pipe set
XCEL ENERGY ELECTRIC MAR X.ED
with a Piasbc Cap Stamped 42302
t? Denotes a Found o Monument
E� I D G E 6 I N E
THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD FACILITIES OR
x 932.6 Denotes Existing Spot Elr
STRUCTURES AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY ARE BASED ON AVAIUIBLE
G R O V P
RECORDS AT THE TIME THE SURVEY WAS PREPARED AND ARE NOT
U.
- --9211- - Denotes Existing Contour Line
GUARANTEED TO BE COMPLETE OR CORRECT. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL
—•K..— Denotes Buried Gas Line
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS (SURVEYORS
UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES NOT SHOWN ON THE PLAN THAT
—�.«— Denotes Buried Electric lire
-{ B
30692 HIGHWAY 58 LVD
MAY BE REQUIRE RELOCATION OR REMOVAL. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF,
—R. — Denotes Buried Telephone7Cabie Line
,.\ REDWING, 55'""
J
THE CONTRACTOR TO REQUEST A GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PRIOR TO THE
Denotes Existing Fare
(764-9595
&5„ 21
START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL
x 9320 Denotes Proposed Spot Elevation
-2639-5
FACILITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF SAID UTILITIES
— Denotes Drainage Direction
DURING THE COURSE OF WORK.
Denotes Proposed UppedLower Spot Elevation
Revrsbns: A X.:14, 2017
Z, 16, 2017
-R&.- TI-eE S-EVATM AIRE I rrHCAL 0yeRFAIr12
IY1*,wmTIco1LYA.�W".
.m"0A TOEEI
ucm,cccR
=00,15 4 �eAY EA)e TOM W Ni�—*FMT—W-
VARr F.," W&L k4VE P
"m Ww CMEKWE
ELEVAMN MALIM W N7 5Y&E —V�TOM�
z
BUILDERS
ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA
� z WFIO I 1w
COa33LMX EEL PJ
�ALLANW
LAYEP�$G�� V KZr RLT MP) WAL VMk iRFXiHdLRTW19CW
.ww
e --57"C",
17,777 71 77
w NMI
�
Ills
®�
I/I�
�
p`
.Illmimllill�
••+ -
� mmmmmmmmn
z
BUILDERS
ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA
� z WFIO I 1w
COa33LMX EEL PJ
�ALLANW
LAYEP�$G�� V KZr RLT MP) WAL VMk iRFXiHdLRTW19CW
.ww
T'pE" f
�LT EZ51ING FRo",
— A' -L VGT- 0
-R L:/EL W4 -L ---T.s-11a,
__V__
I -'LOOR $Y57EI 5L" o D7
UPPER LEVELFLOOR 5y5T-�^',
6— R TR.'
E.1
F,0t SF 252 5F
2260 - 1115-
3037 a n9
5 l
'6, 5F
-T -- �T 41�
MSIGN ON=PLANs
ANDDFMGKSWE3tECRDATED AND
DZVELOPEDINCONNFMONWITB THM
SP=CPRQJECrANVSBALLNOT BE
WNAT
��N PERMW ON OF tHE DESIGN
CQP.•NEMONANI) BL!.M
MOHR,
BID PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
t4l
2)
C4
Cau
U.8
PROJECT N, 16098
DRAWN13Y. AIT/RCI
CHECKED BY: AIT
PRELIM SFr DATE. APPaX2017
BTDSETDATE: JAUNT A IDi7
FIFIALSErDATE
PRINTED: 08-3017
RXHIT (SOUTH)
EXI'ERIOR ELEVATION
A1.3
-2641-
e --57"C",
17,777 71 77
T'pE" f
�LT EZ51ING FRo",
— A' -L VGT- 0
-R L:/EL W4 -L ---T.s-11a,
__V__
I -'LOOR $Y57EI 5L" o D7
UPPER LEVELFLOOR 5y5T-�^',
6— R TR.'
E.1
F,0t SF 252 5F
2260 - 1115-
3037 a n9
5 l
'6, 5F
-T -- �T 41�
MSIGN ON=PLANs
ANDDFMGKSWE3tECRDATED AND
DZVELOPEDINCONNFMONWITB THM
SP=CPRQJECrANVSBALLNOT BE
WNAT
��N PERMW ON OF tHE DESIGN
CQP.•NEMONANI) BL!.M
MOHR,
BID PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
t4l
2)
C4
Cau
U.8
PROJECT N, 16098
DRAWN13Y. AIT/RCI
CHECKED BY: AIT
PRELIM SFr DATE. APPaX2017
BTDSETDATE: JAUNT A IDi7
FIFIALSErDATE
PRINTED: 08-3017
RXHIT (SOUTH)
EXI'ERIOR ELEVATION
A1.3
-2641-
0 KNLE�.a - - " --- - -
BUILDERS
ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA
(D 4", 45 �� - " � � -�' - ` 6 "' � 6
ARia�@ TFI-4=W6MkQVM
D(19dQ2 SYR
MAL EYJRI'MUL iRFJ(16Y.R Tw am
eD4w
61,100wTY11�111 1E
6�-zRIC
5715 FIRO57
"AIYLEELUALL L6T
woD 5711c5
UPPER -1E'
E,EL LOOR-y5T:M
5L45 ON CQADE
jpFER VEL = OarY57EM
1a PUR 7e55
-ma2
'NL-' sF 11-1
Q =' 30`-0 F
2323 F
-0
3032 5;
2�'
5=
'b2
4�'-
�53 5-
-1
.b --1-
DFSIG WNNE ON THEE PANS
A MSIGNSWEUCR m AND
DEIUGPWR400NNEC110NW —
SPFrMCFROJP.CTAW NOT HE
RFPROKAM ktlRANY P(JRPDSE
WmTsoiVFR WPD30LRTtB;EXPREES
Wv�" PERMI ONOF—ESJGX
OD]TMONANDBWDER
Him
2
BID PLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
Uro
PROJECT 16098
DRAWNDY.' AYT/RCJ
CHEUEDRY; AJT
PRELIMSETDAU, APRT M2017
BIDSUDATE. 1m21,20I7
FINALSETDATE:
Aug ()R. 3017
LEFT (NORT[D
EXTERIOR ELEVATION
A1.4
-2642-
Lk�
10
t*l FSSOSUICON OF MINNESOTA 1.. • n
Do
•'•.• ••�•" 1Ha9T W
136'9�H.YJ� j bPAV3 PAHO DR
tl� vi
wear_ eooM
TH4T
ne �
b�Fr ml snaresnlva=na
TF.$H2ll3N®EpY
iVEN1�LF R932
RfXR1RY.l4.9 TO WICE NIA^
1pNCltE �l�F92iA<10
TREE l9FP.@2 TO Y4iiY IIV
oil T FRLRTOiWRCA
�i fy
._, __�_. �pT681 G^ElEi'ftWl RR
6 d eeIwL LArarcFCAarE1Rr(
KW iRAClYNIH P lA't OLBE'2 %111"
ONNG All
uaFrRp� a1rEDgC9 r - ---------1 \'
i
- POi
S b.. .} FILLER'
r51 �LY�s rY9x-Y, �� I
MBV96LLVL
OAeWW4.Ls OVEW
MIRGO
� .I�
_ a
3@p951L LR Y9d-Y NIH2CRFOJSNI *9L[
RYl1.ADGN CF YIW18 Mb
FL>ff YPCCJOUH{_ \\\\
FRNGEATT N
GNYY£OR FC1Y£
I
6Ae
--- i MLA
R I I r
i
� xp9lGCCTRtf�OJ� �
cfiTER •Y!)R3'OIE+Yi#Y
(W1XLB.99MH WD�9TlM I
I i
tR31� LFSYE GRG�. tlY. SET O.f32
' auN I nnax�rTT�wraTW.tmN
O/d2 f!)LATHSYl2Y.E b
( I � tar ntn�
s% �s� Pae�ti
Y9RFYF0
SPM9. PATIOD.E
WDER STAIR
PRAUEIRS
ro
8
I4'.0' Q' -]'f0 1'-4' 1'-1'
tl tll Q'•4' Itl CI 1•'-b' jtl tl t'
_ OLIU�STOE S81$tW
�.� BRIXLE�CE CROS.
6Za• P�J.'1�6'ti �' EfK gTaFR MICR
�-CTRY �t£fbL LAIN
W 90 x b'0 //� 0.92fJJ LATHE Cii.4LE
F3T RTP)
HA__ as
6
R:CY39 F
(YHSYI 8 p O
nN e
FAYEi
-_ !LYATKN
�1
Q4J-YlN bL'i1H2
\ _ O
LLFLYIL Af9�1t41108 IX1R AEHEAATIO6
CN L<ICiE NlG Xip-YE'xb'A'
SN -StYiE NtYr Eft -PAR
L`ftf-fl®'B.T FD-R'T3�CC¢R
pW .AWtY m-CA'IDCFDiJ-
6) -FC® ff -H4'QD CQ.R9
N -L6T YUBY+ ®-BMd:0.LR
(S) . pTAIYNfRY
fFl -E3S'9
R)-1Bi8a3J
hU-4'Q91LttiH2
M-Y91D9(RR A'IMGI
(lA -Cf&LS
l9'-alYbBrpFCYW'LAHt
---____� LVL d DIMENSIONAL HEADER KEY:
NO OF KIrYs STUDS �� MbtNO3£
NO 6 TRP'MER9 � w�
9 F Rf R tiAY
OL9:ATID:I V
FEat�atFaaro
G2890H-CR iR C9'R (FJ a+FA2/ TFL C91f (FJ(�
19�Y R> rO t'ia' x a'-0' R�Tb' x p'al
e
NP1E' � Al�FRAtE
6CROOFlMJfirD (
anLl� (mJtN CAP
�acmttcv
il£i FUl6 AR: NI@!� KR a51Mr1tti
PA@LYB CtLYUlCOUf�'S WfttA11]!
Trt�FOtOADCN N93ADOy MATDdA19, W0
602Y.TILi t9'F98 M6Y O WYE C$92N.
COARKKR S W LL fE R�FffiE fat
Y9�'ft1' AW IXC1SfWTNi At1 OWY�
kO RR1°J?S TO SAiBB AfD SH'S
11
11 212 -2
LVL 2 11,75211
[E'CN 61x LEY8tQ2LK d'
L°L MfF52(°,II • NF1lR1&0('/
NdiSER CF MHiBEfb
w4'' NICK IC w LEL FEADER
EIS LVA M21BEfdi ARE 131(tTP)
MAN LEyH_ PLAN NgrE.x
l
FRMXSCWMWL ATFA01HDff ORd
1RPBP3 Rb RSIB®.
2 FFQICEAWiLVUl B'f�2. ALL GNit
s uNttwaFRJH2roY9sYuumu'$UiLNt'F8z(
R]Cfl O=fM' GMDttEY M�tOZE
L FRMCEI'N"W VYAIE GF.�M09YLff3p
YAibltEQ1WDNN36'GFREfMJF9BLCR(
M]�TW ti'A"..OE RIa�CRAGE CR 9IFKE
EFWYE4'L:iiB2
33 FU(1glA115 Aff L31HJtN3l RJS WYE f931
R,SM
4 ALL. IXfF3dCRUW16TOWYEYFAR J2 NMKAIR
tJ1� R.KID 0.92 ttE Df IBS'R F/� ff
YEAIHYx N7.1LW-1N: CdBEF34Xa CF N1 iRf>�3
51 WI aADOi At(E/6t L5TaiR .E
RL10wt0 W`.f:l'[ODW/i YHIILAKN
FFD,MA 46RRAI WTEaWD
N(Ht'TtlBlf YHJIRAl10102�cMFCRO.NilU?H
a2 aAn(nee5YUH2KYY:Hib
fi 5!618 TO WEE I4E FQ101pG
bt M1 RE/O.Itl,NWct�.tY4 Y9d-TNiHII
62 NTIGff NTIffii{4N j'02tCR:TNM W{'p
fF0#dDb �' WN]NL •3{'A'1).E i1FR0.
6A 35'NRALWD4.4'M4x GFEd!Y
fid M•AANAMMU11EAp OFMlNfff 1'4/(b'A'
MUFRT„fa:AD tYttrY
ba AZP.8511.E PBDllbIcwl WYE Yt'GYP3li
axJa FN'IJi a Uuus Wo rFxers
1 IQ109V t0 Wl£1VEkilLllK.
ll SEE p1a81flefEfftFN FCR AGNN. LAYOIfff
(JffiETRt Kd�MRW1EflJ1'IWNIEi
T! LY SRCh. gTD9-Ati W4J8
1?YYA'W15QE1WAt COMER
ii RCC�M6fF8:i.YLtYNFPLatS SffdRUiKW
OEWAt18 AV> IIOD OH RAINS pkR42.Oi1
R-ti169J Mtl@ W AR
14 PJACE bRGH'/H�.Et4Ef4M92RR
L'A.F1IP&82(ft!!YN' OSEe•IA) (tFilAtE NA
PANS ARE ITIB PROPMWOFTJBI
DF53GNMNNECfIONTNCSEPL S
ANDDMIGNSWYYtii CREA7ID ATN
DEVELOPED W CONNECI'IC'ti WDN THE
SPE+M'ICPROJE(.TANDSNALLNOT B.:
Rt;PRODUCFD FOA ANY PU W R.iSE
WfSATsoEVE,R WilIONOF �ERPR
WRTPIFN PICA SIONOFTHE DESIGN
coNNEcnoN.ANDBDevnn
HIM 11
BID PLAN
NOT F )R
CONSTRUCTION
Iw,H+ursroFam9,�,cc.aaxcF uEs
Elm
W
a �o1H1.K+�ARAtfau IfMrk
waLSTo � Fn'tirE x GrP aw1TPE x vTP
mmu�eal.e>seax aJFA®
9 WL 6N1H9SW41 WYf Aa'CY1111 N4�!
Nav�raJ�xt:mA�e-s+r ccn'
ID. AJIHM.RR'S]'IdBLiR1/+�AtT%Dtlt41EAID 9Bl�f
TOOYNE YF3•-T WM EXIHd.'RLRHYA'NbifdY9
Q'
n asu.AtICNYAUEsroff F+asT®+e.rslawc orr
rOELLJRGQF1l1AL FRLRTOFdW. N^�L801
0
W
W
x W
a
w �
�
O
u
w
U U
0 H
ti
� c�<E
-
PROIECCq: 16U4R
DRAWN BY: MLRCt
W JCJ _; FriY GES R
CHECKED BY: A1T
LO,,CR L / L :IIA' WGT. EX VS F.RC5T
ALL--T. Fm-, .9 'XCD 5; 05
PRHN27DA7£ APRIX2017
'�P R yA 9 5 CC'7Z5
BN SEC DATE JUNE2Z,2017
.M \/ LCCR M 5 A5 R.. E
FRUISECDATE:
L P R EVE_ FLCCR 5 TE ^ -LR RUS5
E T 5 F N�-E NO-�_
PRDMD: 3Agg 18.2011
0,'04TICN SO FT: 3066 5F 2923 5F
114 N LE/E, 54 F- 22g-? 5F '.45 5F
MAIN LEVEL
--JPPEtRi LEVEL 50 _ . 25'31 5F
FLMR PL"N
GAR•.'E'SO
FPCN-, ?ORC'J 50 FT. 4!1 r
REAR PCIZS+ 50 ET -53 a
:,FFEN REAR FGCN;" 5C FT. °..);. SF
-2643-
BUILDER MINNE50W to 14'-m• to to w- 114
' A550CIATION Of - —
_....... 1' 0 0 V' -a' tl tl 1' P n tl Q' -a' tl VI T
fw
[: IC£ARRfRA1F
SiA00F(Agk6]lr
q r, sat nmyf NGw r
LJm LJ
6
- 9 g. -m, g.-=, i, -a. i' -g, g, -b. 8,-g, a. -g. �-5. g -g•
R06'-3 H'zb'-m)S' n01'E'x3'-b' RJD'Ox3'E' wv5 .Y .
FRib'-Z k'xb'-MN' F05'41x3'E'
SEEM= ellsommummu--
326D R11 LKiR GYffN TF. G31t (LP?y fXi. (L,iy 3mEBR11 L1:Nf G(i. (Fl(LR7
0311' ff) G91f (Fl
® I
LM131 �
R�&HF('.H.7FY7 RA5HFt18drY1
n -c n c
AYfT agog,
' ' ' ' � 18k'f, agki6 LGYATKN
of 0
®
L T 5L' �2
76flD'BGWL (A"D,Si$F hS.'PT7 Q Q
1
1 (,1 6YJ-@.VAi
1
Wd ®i � � ]'-6' {'-m' 5'.11' t'.T 3•-6• y -f•
's
fs)9V8v1�M18aY7
Hacr�
Haab' u, Tweet a (s> Ia�maP(vexPn �'
6¢6B Pl-PA°8
Q
El f 0 El
El
]6Dg � ❑
Y>'Y- VlH
6D 3"R W
n8°JY]IER LRIEN ,�,
vALT v�
rvx rwr
Lei' ER LE -VEL 'LAN
GA,- ••ALF _ \
50'-61
i8i Flra.aFd: MELS RR EDiTk1TG
PRi78 OtY YeLYW dffi5, F01LWMt1
TiFI: fQ1L14nCN N384110y HA1ed,Y5, iY0
SiRGTJNL I'Bffitr MAY OYtYf (58EM.
mVIRKRR BVNJ. ff FEX'�9EFUt
A`iJ I�11PION TOBFfLeB CD 98B
uwwetl�+Anoa
CN -m NNS
rxzRA�anas
76E8-T1'xb'A'_
CHECKEDBY:
YI-c.r�cFllYs
P,i -PAR
APR0.AMI
AW -A
A& --AMU
W -Ft' TaY.R
m-CA'Sq�fY
FNALSETDATE:
ff7 -FD®
EF-5fLiDLYC%
A,, . 0A. 2017
rs•-sranauRr
w -Ra sm�
ai85g
'. rw-ra�Lrnez
M-F8J(PYa?CRNINR'iJ
(W-Cfdl1.5
(6� - HN86TU4tl.'llR83
5.4
V
LVL 8 DIMENSIONAL HEADER KEY:
6
ND CF KMG MO. tom, ffiBPNf6E
NO OP TRIMTERS � A'IN6KR`JY/.E
PBEB2IFN.W3 f14Y
9
aGrtf AtIBt1KN TO
-
H 212 -2 rSfilf�9FfYW TO
LVL 21118 - 2 I
�L8'M62, VEA'H2ORL4L cf
a sI N 55H
H 7 9 1- 2
tnrt�ezrev. s'S'7(um.eY,'7
as i n n.
waER o=tErBEfd
_. e e g c n e i et
ax a Lw o. LSL FADER
Lw �* nEF3 a 1 v4' TNIOC Mr)
CdPYRIGHT NOTICE
ALL DESICK SPECMCATR)NSA.ND
s,
�.�L.t.
�I E-�Y�";/I��
LLYLEVEL
PIANS AAE M PAOPERTYOFTHE
OFSIINWMiEC1lONlNESEPiAhS
L FRNYE 50.D61091 -AT Fl01 @D GF fifd�
AEVEWPONSWERE LECTION AND
DEVEtAPED PI CONNECRON kiOT TBE
> �
SPERODL RO1Pf'r ANDSBALLNOT HE
2 FQ'TIlBAYWLL^&i BNaaL��Al GWR
AEPRMFUMFOA ANY PLIWE
WB I'IHEEXPRtN
3 DRLbYOFRIB2TO V�FYDMaIIPI>£041N11.$3a
.N FERNIMON
WM'1T:NPE ANDO DER DFJKRJ
CONNFC170NANU HIIBDER
-
3t P�/LfYwU9V VNIELFSMD JCL 6.3m
-
mm
SCI
cc�3
`az
i2 Itd-IX.WSLL WNN36'ffliEAi°.t®flLCRr
C$OUFl4F£%LfttHt [RYE GR9�A�
v�y7 � �Bz(p
ID� � ��(F��
�O � Fpi
/�8
=
ii ARt 051Ef 1tB1 R'l3 WLEE®d
FEMW
ary��¢
�y„�`'n 4135
a ALLE%192LRUW.L5ro H46£uFAn6t�'91M1f AR
6'R&.NMWXL.BtifEEXIWcrzFttEff5E4nRG
Rl11LfGl1EGKiE Bblff NL IRPRr'8.
5.51
ffiIFHpq� qqq ®$
�tl �Cf K
�w ��A� ��rc�
WH1?Ci/9'YffAi LFi9I 15gQ'BPdHE FFE
R91�L0 HALE I'8]4'W'CiY t811CAnQ!t�ie
Cp
�AtN t9Rtl.AnOi RalEff'.0 m.,
Mi6:RtBd SBSO.dil(11CR20cfn FGR m11R1Yi.Y
52 WN 118/"JLLH24=1A
t�$Q-1pp -yi M
3®®C® a
6. Sia.TB TO WEE TEFQIDNC
61 PW irtw. M,HIX FkHt•43'N. 1@6Y NfHD.
62 N%lGffNA!lA1NW�'QaisTa:NaI-Vdk
� I[ J
��QQii I�IMYhY
�rDraDa �' NttLRNI � 3d'tgJ.ETfFlO.
63 56'NpNLUV BdL!'MA%Q�K
64. MNMANAMN1M Hi1DO&FkYE LF t'0r6'A'
PRD F3] i ifF/+`l 1L'PA"
—_
BID PLAN
63 A'>�^iKE MFAgmGwsraRTmwxE V!'6TFJH
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
wrr gra:Act: ro A �A+(ff a.
a RneacRam G95LKN Aff A�FRAGIW1E kba8�f
Toourr� ',ear Ulw oaeaearerva+SRars
Q,
0
W
z
w z
a
Q
00
3
1-W de
� �xQ
r C)
� o �
G iG� lz-�=�� GE QG -
-
WNDOi T-E/5TYL E. GENERIC
L0,21 '_EVE'_�4LL:GT : EX'.ST'vGFROST
'AWLE _L y'•L I.GT.
'..PP E'rEL L 1— I' 3 11,8XT D 57C,
�`IA I LEYEL 9L OCR 5 57, 5LA5 OZ GRADE
?PER LEVEL FL00R SYSTEM, '8' FL.'R TR'SS
EXLE
-O.;ND.ITIG`! SG F+. 306n 5= 7923 5r --__
'4N LET__ 5C =T. :-,-O .= T15 5f
uu�-R' E'VELT, T.32 SF Dagi S-
GARAG-E 50 FTy� 826 S %2 S=
=RG'aT �GRG-I 50 r„ -
REAR 5G FT:50p, 453 -cl
PROIEUk
DRAWN BY:
1601A
MURO
CHECKEDBY:
AIT
PREDASETDATE
APR0.AMI
RB)SETDATE,.
R1NET MU
FNALSETDATE:
PRUMD:
A,, . 0A. 2017
UPPER LE 1:1.
FLOOR PIAN
- -eb44-
GENERAL PROJECT NOTES
I. BUILDING CODES USED FOR DESIGN:
D. INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, 2012 EDITION.
b. MINNESOTA RESIDENTIAL GOOF, 2015 EDITION.
2, FCUNDATIINS
21. CF 1=Mr, B2SN'y FOORYSH OF59 E'B$FCRANAVFVMIALffNBNS Ff�B�
GF IY,D Fg A`OA L4TBW_ FTg9fE0=Y1 FRF. RWLL ff 1!f IMQ'ORHS RJ
Vc�FYItEg ATO RAID 1HAT DH4YaIN5 DR�,TIK gT118MB.R DULL NOf CCCLR
22 FOTIfYii B4YL �QNCRNIIMCLNPOGT®RLL Q2 N4TRN.I.NxSTUffilY1LCRGTIRXK
RBTLTiH: E\t5n15 SaL AT FLDBFG BPYAnQ& FTtLRID KOtWS [CNilRCi1Q{ IEOIFY
CEiSf�GR BlaTffit IFEx5nN5'1IL5 HE NJf 9.IV8E
13, WNI FLD111GBPVATOBONN'$BOOL B: SIBFBIAtA Rgn061h13NtK.N)T02
dCRZLMN). NIWWMVHZECIN_SIB'3VNLff Se^
2AMNXW(DIPJ.
4 EN`IIW WNL RDIIlYfi FCR1FAT®SIfdE:RIQT.a BULL HAEAMtiMMINV50L COr£¢Ni CF 3'fi"
(471, TCDIIFYS. PNDliB& FGRLNfATHJSnd.GiU�9WL H4,EAMNM.M'X,1LC0.8t CF 94
167) FF1618x Rd?M tlf BORQN[F TtOI1Ni.
h. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ALL WOOD CONNECTIONS TO BE NAILED BEAM - 5EE -"
GEILIHIS JO 5T TO PARALLEL RAFTERS, FACE NAIL 3-I6d
RAFTER TO PLATE, TOENAIL 3 -ed
�� WRAP TOP OF
AS FOLLOWS PLAN
WIND ... 90 MPH
P05T5 IN/
CON -ION NAILING
WILT -UP GIRDER AND BEAMS, 3 OR MORE PIECES 20d AT 32'0.6.
CEDAR 2x6
J015T TO 51LL OR GIRDER, TOENAIL 3-8d
TOP PLATE TO STUD, END NAIL 2-I6d
•... EXPOSURE 8
(2) GEPAR bxb
5TUD TO SOLE PLATE 4-Bd, TOENAIL
ED6ES, 12" AT INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS) VNO
WRAPED
2-t6d, END NAIL
STRENGTH AT
O. EACH PANEL OF CONSTRUCTION SHEATHING SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH
DOUBLE 5TUD5, FACE NAIL Ibd AT 24' O.G.
THE APPROPRIATE GRADE -TRADE MARK OF THE AMERICAN
3000 5'D W. INTERIOR SLABS 6 WALLS
DOUBLED TOP PLATES, FACE FAIL I6d AT I6' O.G. WRAP BOTTO
4600 5TD. WT. EXTERIOR SLABS t WALLS
b. GRADE AND TYPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
TOP P TE5, LAPS AND INTERSECTIONS, FACE NAIL 2-I6d OF POST V`V
ROOF SHEATHING: 32/16 APA RATED SHFATHIN6 EXPOSURE I
EXTERIOR WALL: 24/16 APA RATED 5HEATHIN5 EXPOSURE 1
b. MASONRY I* = 15O0 PS (. 28 Daysl
CONTINUOUS HEADER, TWO PIECES I66 AT 16' O.C. CEDAR 2X6
ALONG EACH EDGE
. REINFORCEMENT Fy = 60000 PSI ASTM A615
STONE GAP
CEILING JOISTS TO PLATE, TOENAIL 3-Bd
INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS WITH 84 NAILS.
e. 5TWCTURAL TUBING Fy = 46000 PSI ASTM A5CO GRAVE B
f. 5TANDARD STEEL PIPE Fy - 36000 P51 ASTM A53 GRADE B
CONTINUOUS HEADER TO STUD, TOENAIL 4-bd
99 PLATES Fy 36000 1551 ASTM A56
CEILING JOISTS, LAPS OVER PARTITIONS, FACE NAIL 3-I6d
MSG STRUCTURAL SHAPES Fy = 36000 F51 ASTM A36
11, LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER (LVO t PARALLEL 5TRAND LUMBER (P5U
5, DESIGN LOAO5•
q. DESIGN LIVE LOADS:
GEILIHIS JO 5T TO PARALLEL RAFTERS, FACE NAIL 3-I6d
RAFTER TO PLATE, TOENAIL 3 -ed
ROOFSLIVE-35 P5PMEAD-I1 P5F
(NOT APPLICABLE TO TRIPS CONNECTIONS)
WIND ... 90 MPH
BUILT-UP CORNER STUDS (6d AT 24.O.C.
FLOORS LIVE -40 P5F/DEPA-IS PSF
WILT -UP GIRDER AND BEAMS, 3 OR MORE PIECES 20d AT 32'0.6.
DECKS LIVE -40 P5F,'DEAD-10 PSF
AT TOP AND BOTTOM, 5TAS5ERED
•... EXPOSURE 8
PLYWOOD (NAILS SPACED AT 6' O.C. AT SO
4. DESIGN STRESSES.
ED6ES, 12" AT INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS) VNO
Q. CONCRETE:
10, WOOD SHEATHING
STRENGTH AT
O. EACH PANEL OF CONSTRUCTION SHEATHING SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH
2$ DAY'JP51/ TYPE NIX LOCATION
THE APPROPRIATE GRADE -TRADE MARK OF THE AMERICAN
3000 5'D W. INTERIOR SLABS 6 WALLS
PLYWOOD ASSOCIATION.
4600 5TD. WT. EXTERIOR SLABS t WALLS
b. GRADE AND TYPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
AIR -ENTRAINED
5000 5TD. HT FOOTINGS
ROOF SHEATHING: 32/16 APA RATED SHFATHIN6 EXPOSURE I
EXTERIOR WALL: 24/16 APA RATED 5HEATHIN5 EXPOSURE 1
b. MASONRY I* = 15O0 PS (. 28 Daysl
FLOORS, 24Ab APA RATED SHEATHING EXPOSURE 1
. REINFORCEMENT Fy = 60000 PSI ASTM A615
NAIL ALL SHEATHING b" OCTAT PANEL EDGES AND 12' O.G. AT
I riIDE FLANGE SHAPES Fy 50.000 P51 ASTM A5T2
INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS WITH 84 NAILS.
e. 5TWCTURAL TUBING Fy = 46000 PSI ASTM A5CO GRAVE B
f. 5TANDARD STEEL PIPE Fy - 36000 P51 ASTM A53 GRADE B
99 PLATES Fy 36000 1551 ASTM A56
MSG STRUCTURAL SHAPES Fy = 36000 F51 ASTM A36
11, LAMINATED VENEER LUMBER (LVO t PARALLEL 5TRAND LUMBER (P5U
I.
L BOLTS FV - 120000 & ASTM AI 5
I ANCHOR BOLTS W 60000 P51 ASTM A30T
a. ALL LVL HEADERS AND BEAMS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWINI6 MINIMUM
I. WELD ELECTRODE Fy 10000 P51
PROPERTIES:
I. WELDED WIRE FABRIC ASTM AI85
ALLOWABLE BENDING STRESS, Fb = 2600 P51
ALLOWABLE SHEARSTRESS, Fv = PEI
EI
5. CONCRETE COVERAGE FOR RNFORGEMENi:
MODULUSOF ELAE_A STT ICITY, E c 1,900.0OID 00O P51
FOOTINGS 3"
b. ALL PSL HEADERS AND BEAMS SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM
FOUNDATION WALLS EXTERIOR FACE 2'
PROPERTIES:
I`
INTERIOR FACEALLOWABLE
BENDIN6 5TRE55, FD,= 2900 P51
COLUMNS 1/2" TO TIES
EXPOSED EXTERIOR CONCRETE 2"
ALLOWABLE SHEAR STRESS, - - 290 PS
MODULUS OF ELASTICITY, E = 2000000 P51
SLAB ON 6RADE CENTER OF SLAB
c. LVL t PSL MEMBERS SHALL BE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING,
6, MASONRY COVERAGE FOR REINFORCEMENT:
"MICRO-LAMBY TRUE_V15T/ MACMILLAN CORPORATION.
WALLS 3 1/2' MIN (CENTER REBAR IN WALL U.N.0)
"PANG -LAM' BY LOUISIANA PACIFIC.
°PARALLAM'
PILASTERS 3' TO TIES
BY TR115,IOISTMACMILLAN CORPORATION.
+:.OTU -('TYLE GE>ER%C
LO R T_¢.:>LL'LT G
MULTIPLE -PLY SHA -1- BE FA5FENET.) AGOORPINS, TO
T. CONCRETE,
a, CONCRETE WORK SHALL CONFORM TO ALL REQUIREMENT5 OF AGI POI.
MANUFAC TVRERS INSETRUCTIONS, UILE55 NOTED O E9RWISE.
D . UNLESS SPECIFIED BELOW, CONCRETE MIDST REACH THE FOLLOWING
PERCENTAGES OF ITS 28 DAY GOMFRE5S VE 5TRENGTH (F'G) BEFORE
12. ROOF ANO FLOOR TRUSSES,
FORMS MAY BE REMOVED
WALL5, COLUMNS AND BEAM SIDES R0 PERCENT
o. TRUSSES, JACK RAFTERS AND VALLEY RAFTERS SHALL BE DE516NED
TO MEET ALL LOADING AND SPANS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS.
JOIST PANS AND BEAM BOTTOMS TO PERCENT
FLOOR 5Y5TEM5 80 PERCENT
b. TRU55E5 AND RAFTERS SHALL BE DE516NED AND CERTIFIED BY A
RE615TEREO FROFES510NAL ENGINEER WITH ONE SET ON SITE AND
8, REINFORCED MASONRY,
ONE FOR WE INS AND SAFETY.
c. SUPPLIER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL BRACING AND/OR
a. HOLLOW LOAD BEARING MASONRY UNITS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM
C90 TYPE 1, IN ADDITION TO THE REQ)IREMENT5 OF THE QUALI Y
BR06INS REQUIRED FOR THE DE516N OF THE TRUSS MEMBERS.
d. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BRACING AND/OR
CONTROL STANDARDS OF THE CONCRETE MA50NRY ASSOCIATION.
(BASED ON NET AREA). MINIMUM FACE SHELL THICKNESS TO BE 1 U4' FOR
BRIDGING REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
a. ALL LUMBER USED IN THE FABRICATION OF TRUSSES SHALL BE -STRESS
8' BLOCK, 1 3/8' FOR 10" BLOCK, AND 1 1/2" FOR 12' BLOCK.
GRADED. CONINECTOR PLATES SHALL BE MADE OF GRAPE "A'
b. MASONRY UNIT5 SHALL HAVE BEEN CURED FOR NOT LESS THAN 28
DAYS WHEN PLACED IN THE STRUCT)RE-
GALVANIZED STEEL, MINIMUM 20 GAGE PER LATEST TPI SPECIFICATIONS.
F. FLOOR TRU55E5 UNDER PARALLEL PARTITIONS SHALL BE DOUBLED.
c. GROUT FOR VERTICALLY REINFORCED MASONRY WALL5 AND BOND
9. PROVIDE 9/PPLEMENTAL UPLIFT STEEL BRACKETS FOR EVERY ROOF
BEAMS SHALL BE PROPORTIONED AS FOLLOWS: 1 PORTLAND GEMENT: 2
TRU55 OF 26 FEET OF 6REATER ----- - _-
N. WHEN USABLE SPADE BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW THE CONGEALED SPADE OF
USABLE
12 FINE AGGREGATE: 2 PEA &RAVEL: f'c - 3000 PSI AT 26 DAYS.
GROUT SLUMP SHALL BE 9' TO 10".
ASSEMBLY, DRAFT5TOP5 SHALL BE IN5TALLED S.O THAT
THE AREA OF THE CONCEALHJ SPACEDOES NOTEXCEED 1000 SQUARE FEET.
THE
d. DOWELS AS, SHOWN SHALL MATCH SIZE AND NUMBER OF REINFORCING
-
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. HOOK INTO FOOTIN6 1'-0" MIN. AND LAP 20
DIAM. WITH MAIN STEEL.
e. TYPE "5' MORTAR RECN)IRED FOR BEARING WALLS BELOW GRADE,
13. WOOD WEB JOISTS.
TYPE 'N° MORTAR REQUIRED FOR BEARING WALLS ABOVE GRADE
O. J015T5 SHALL BE SIZED AND DETAILED TO FIT THE DIMENSIONS
MORTAR SHALL BE OF A PORTLAND GEMENT TYPE MIX.
AND LOADS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS.
I.ALL STEEL BEAMS BEARING ON MASONRY SHALL BE WELDED TO
b. ALL WOOD WEB I-J015T5 TO BE SUPPLIED AND MANUFACTURED
BEARING PLATE AND HAVE 2 CORES MINIMUM FILLED WITH &RCVT
DIRECTLY BELOW THE BEARING POINT EXCEPT AS NOTEP ON THE PLANS.
ACCORDING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TRU5J015TMAGMILLAN
CORPORATION OR THE LOUISIANAN PACIFIC CORPORATION.
g. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM I'-b°XB" 5TRIP FOOTING OR THICKENED
c. BRIDGING OF FLOOR JOIST5 SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURERS
SLAB WITH (2) 64 BARS CONTINUOUS UNDER ALL INTERIOR BEARING WALL5,
RECOMMENDATIONS.
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
h. DO NOT LAY MASONRY WHEN OUTSIDE AIR TEMPERATURE 15 BELOW 40
14. BRICK TIES. (FOR STUD BACK UP)
OE5REE5 F OR 15 EXPECTED TO FALL BELOW 40 DEGREES F, UNLESS ALL
a. THERE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF ONE BRICK TIE FOR EVERY 2 SQ, PT.
MEASURES ARE IN PLACE AND FOLLOWED FOR HEATING AND PROTECTING
MASONRY ACCORDING TO THE COLD WEATHER CONSTRUCTION
OF WALL AREA. THESE SHALL BE SPACED AT A MAXIMUM OF 24 INCHES
ON CENTER TIES SHALL BE OF MINIMUM 9 &A. WFJW51ON RE515TANT
P EDURE5 DEFINED IN THE UNIFORM E0I1DIN6 CODE SECTION 2104.
WIRE AND SHALL BE OF AN ADJUSTABLE TYPE SUCH AS OVR-O-WALL
I. PROTECT MASO RY h1ALL5 FROM EXCESSIVE MOISTURE AFTER LAYIN6.
COVER TOPS OF WALLS WITH WEATHER RE5I5TIVE MEMBRANE WHEN WORK
ADJ/5TABLE DA201 OR EQUAL, CORRWATED GALVANIZED SWEET TIES
ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. ALL TIES MIST BE ATTACHED THROWH THE
IS NOT IN PROGRESS.
SHEATHING TO THE STUDS PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS.
). FOR ALL OPENINGS, THROUGH MASONRY WALLS INCLUDING MECHANICAL AND
N•
ELECTRICAL OPENINGS, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
15. BACKFILLING, 5
COMPACTING OF EARTH SHALL BE PERMITT
O. NO BACKFILLING AND ED
a. STEEL ANGLE LINTELS:
AGAINST FOUNDATION WALLS UNTIL 5APORTIN6 SLABS HAVE BEEN
- BEAR b° ON EACH END.
POURED AND HAVE REACHED "TS% OF THEIR DESIGN STRENGTH OR UNLESS
- GROUT 2 -GORES SOLID FOR 3 - OVIR5E5 AT BEARING (U N.0)
ADEQUATE BRACIN6 SUB ITT5D FOR REVIEW 15 PROVIDED.
I-3-1/2 X 3-1/2 X 1/4
MOVEMENT OF WALLS.
ANGLE FOR EACH 4" THICKNESS OF WALL FOR SPANS UP TO 4'-0°
b. BOTH SIDES OF FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE BACKFILLED
1-5 X 3-1/2 X 5/16 (LLV)
511•ULTANEOJSLY SO A5 TO PREVENT OVERTURNING OR LATERAL
ANGLE FOR EACH 4" THICKNESS OF WALL FOR SPANS UP TO 5'-0"
16.
1-6 X 3-1/2 X SAS (LLV)
16.1. CONTRACTOR SHALL. PROVIDE ALL TEMPORARY BRACING, SHORING,
ANGLE FOR EACH 4" THICKNESS OF WALL FOR SPANS UP TO b -O'
6UYIN16 OR OTHER MEANS NECESSARY TO AVOID EXCESSIVE STRESSES
b. BLOCK LINTEL5 IS" HIGH UNI),
AND HOLD STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
_BEA'8" ON EACH END.
162. COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND FEDERAL
- GROUT 2 -GORES SOLID FOR 3 - CO..RSES AT BEARING N.NO)
LAYS, INCLUDING THE OCCUPATION SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA)
° " K 6' K
AND R55U_ATION5 ADOPTED PURSUANT THERETO.
LES
NON-BEARING LESS THAN 3'-4" 214 BOT 2-64 BOT 1-64 BOT
169,THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE
FINISHED STRUCTURE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THEY DO NOT INDICATE
NON-BEARING TO b'-4" 2-64 BOT 2-65 BOT I-65 BOT
THE MEANS OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE ALL ...f 5( -
BEARING LESS THAN 4"-b" 2-115 BOT 2-65 BOT
NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE 5TRLCTURE, WORKMEN OR OTHER
BEARIN6 4'-7 TO W-4'(16" HIGH) 2-66 T45 2-66 T45
PE !45 DURING CONSTRUCTION. SUCH MEASURE SHALL INCLUDE, OUT
ARE NOT LIMITED TO BRACINIS, SHORING FOR CON5TPUGTION EQUIPMENT,
SHORING FOR THE BUILDING SHORING FOR THE EARTH BANKS, FORMS
9. DIMENSION LUMBER.
5CAFFOLDIN&, PLANKING, SAFETY NEST, SUPPORT AND BRACING FOR
CRANES AND 61N POLES, ETC.
o. DIMENSION LUMBER TO BE SPRUCE -PINE -FIR NOJINO2 OR BETTER
(REFER TO THE NATIONAL DE516N SPECIFICATION FOR 5TRE5S6RADE
9
IT. MI5GELLANEOU51 ;t
O. PLACEMENT OF ANCHOR BOLT, PIPE 5LEEVE5, PADS AND OPENINGS
UMBER AND ITS FASTENINGS - LATEST EDITION FOR ALLOWABLE
FOR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED BETWEEN THE GENERAL
STRESSES)
CONTRACTOR AND THE OTHER SUBCONTRACTORS.
b. ALL MEMBER SIZES 61VEN ON PLAN ARE NOMINAL DIMENSIONS.
c. WOOD LINTELS SHALL HAVE A FAL 3" LENGTH OF BEARING AT EACH
b. ALL GORE DRILLING 5HALL BE DONE UNDER THE'JJPERVI5ION OF THE
GENERAL CONTRACTOR. NO REINFOR6IN6 SHALL BE GUT. VERIFY
END UNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED.
LIGATION OF REINFORCING BEFORE CORE DRILLING. THERE SHALL NOT
d. ALL NAILED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE FABRICATED AS FOLLOWS:
(MINIUM REQUIREMENTS FOR IOD NAILS).
BE ANY CORE DRILLING THROUGH BEAMS OR COLUMNS. MAXIMUM CORE _
HOLE THROUGH SLABS SHALL BE PIPE DIAMETER PWS".
1. PROVIDE 1-1/2" END DIST. AND 1-1/4" EDGE DIST,
c. 5EAL ALL TUB GUT OUTS IN CONCRETE FLOOR5
2. SPACE MIL5 1-I/2'
3. ALL NAILS ARE TO O.C.O. CLINCHED.
e. ALL BEAMS AND JOISTS NOT BEARING ON SUPPORTING MEMBER'
a SEAL- SUMP PUMP BASKET TO CONCRETE FLOOR
PROVIDE HIGH
WITH LENR-R RIGID EXTERIOR FOUNDATION 12 INSULATION, EFFICIENCY
EFFICI EATING EQUIPMENT. MIN 92% EFFICIENCY FVRNIACE AND 13
SHALL BE FRAMED WITH "SIMPSON° JOIST HANSER5 OR EaUAL. USE TYPE
IR
SEER AIR CONDITIONING CONDENSER
REHIRED FOR LOADING.
f, HOOP _015T5 SHALL BEAR ON THE F L WIDTH OF SUPPORTING
MEMBERS (STUD DUAL S, BEAMS, ETC), UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
16. COORDINATION WITH CONSTRUCTION DRAWIN65,
g. ALL FOUNDATION PLATES, SILLS AND 5LEEPER5 ON CONCRETE
a. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS
SLAB, WHICH 15 IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH EARTH, AND SILLS WMICH
REST ON CONCRETE OR MASONRY FOUNDATION W 1_5,
WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. WHERE 015GREPANGIE5 OCCUR IT 15
THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE DESIGNER PRIOR TO
SHALL BE TREATED WOOD OR FOUNDATION REDWOOD.
CONSTRUCTION,
�- 5TONE VENEER
01 BA5E 2'-0' x
i-GONC. STOOP
TY CBG'�C ,6!R::
• PTs-er�•�RZFTReu
CG HBLH$
•VY AWPAi®R'SF$FJ K
•EP(pMgDTBLB»B6�RiT
• RN'EEN WtTBR58D N ALL vAlET°u / IP NN 1'4
H]Y FRT1IXi UWLL AT fLL E@t$
•RT]tGfBtE%IBdORBEYAR2b
ABS, PVC, OR EQUIVALENT GAS TIGHT PIPE SHALL BE
EMBEDDED VERTICALLY INTO THE BASE COURSE. THE
M
T XY'^n
EXTENDING 10' IN EACH DIRECTION OR TIED INTO AN
iRFO EFlANi
�6
Y r - -
T rMCAL OJLR•G CGhEw-
'. • R43 PB1AttNrtNUYBTALYF0 BN3UT
O
F✓$, R4tIIF B'19i
•618 RLr VX{RBM£det
11R•IXtUf£AD
OTHERWISE SEALED LID. 5UMP5 USED AS THE SUCTION
PDINT IN A SUB -SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM SHALL
� BtvanQe
HAVE A LID DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE THE VENT PIPE.
V_J
TYF IC& ULALL C05TR:
• 9EXL f iF@t
•IIRDEN.RBR
G
• IAB' EXBEa35EAB.Y
• M+BNT3. K' CG
• R.B 6•N RBmUi1� BLATIW fMU
9
• ANTU Fq.Y VYLTRBJFddHx
4FRER
•In'TTFEx GYP96imtlD
TYPICAL Films
_ •3Y'iG EVFARNif61E IN.J
• ftLllR,l14T- � ftRI fO3 TSTE °JE ! �/Qti
X
,l.'Rt.gei
•3'&3BOQ�03L3RAYKW't
Y
.'" •VITIfE XGTfeMEOA�
UPPER LEVEL
`
DUCTWORK PROVIDED RI P12OR A94E1%1. WILL NEED TO BE
TESTED EOR DUCT TI__ WHEN DUCTWORK 15 LEGATED _DE
UPPER LEVEL BEARING _
OF THE THERMAL ENVELOPE A TOTAL LEAKAGE TEST OF THE ENTIRE
OLCTWat1O SYSTEM SHALL M
pUCTWOWf LOCATED axT M OF THE THERMAL ENVELDPE 9VtALL CE
S
MAIN LEVEL
b' r
BO1 lJr'
Tt i� 16 C2 T -IC LW 116 Q2g
•E¢MG 11R'I
•LLtDE1MSdB2
• W,'FXIBKREiFAT6Y.
•TG811DSe16'0.^
• PoR 6'iN R-�li RN3tN1aN(1'BU
• AML fCLY VIfCRFWSBt
• NT• TTFE x �TP.xMBaaa
TrnC4 � [ iR
•CP31�fOP�.'GIlF3®uY14P.1aF.0'T B' l86
•ISE(FxPceBDL WeBAMR811C•
tlKb� tY.
NL�H
T RIOFODaAY419K(L MIAIKKBVlL ERBD TORP
aR]N. !O�YtYti',AIa: Pd6M.RRCID Mx.AKN
•ffAL.Gd rvEB+�TKHuwLaoaFB
Y h UPPER LEVEL BEARING.
TYPICAL FLOOR
• 6 Cal ETE
•b COtTACTED AFAV➢JR RL
TYPIC FCL DATION C STR
• x• NSB LEtt,E
. Pj'a4<A]CRCifl AIiiEDYYYEe fEK.:IDT B'EECPBa
• b• Y eFCrnP» TrP
'dm' FOR PORTAL RWRR'
� BOT OF FOOTNG
ACL DF510'NS, SPE7FECADONSAND
PLANUS ARE THE M DPERTY OFTHE
DESIGN CONNECTION TH EFi PLANK
ANDDESIGNS WERECREA•IED AND
DNBAPED IN CONNECTION WTITT THE
SPECIFICPROELTAND SHALLNOT HE
RERODUCTD FDR ANY PUR}V SE
W 17TEN 13iRA.`10NO THEE ESIGN5
WID7TFNONAN BOLDER ➢FSIG3i
C@`MFt: [TONAND HDIIDFA
BID FLAN
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
-2645-
RADON: VENT SHALL BE A MINIMUM 3' DIAMETER PIPE
ABS, PVC, OR EQUIVALENT GAS TIGHT PIPE SHALL BE
EMBEDDED VERTICALLY INTO THE BASE COURSE. THE
M
VERTICAL PIPE SHALL NAVE TEE CONNECTION BELOW SLAB
EXTENDING 10' IN EACH DIRECTION OR TIED INTO AN
Q'
INTERIOR TILE LOOP SHALL BE PROVIDED.
BUMP PITS OPEN TO SOIL OR SERVING AS THE
O
TERMINATION POINT FOR SUB -SLAB OR INTERIOR DRAIN
TILE LOOPS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A GASKEfD OR 35
w
OTHERWISE SEALED LID. 5UMP5 USED AS THE SUCTION
PDINT IN A SUB -SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM SHALL
HAVE A LID DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE THE VENT PIPE.
V_J
RADON VENTS ROUTED THROUGH UNCONDITIONED SPACES
SHALL BE INSULATED WITH A MIN. OF R-4 INSULATION.
G
ENERGY CODE ALL INTERIM JOINTSMETHODS AND PENETRATION SHALL BE
SEALED BY THE (GULXED, GASKET®,
FOLID_.a
WEATHER-STRIPPED, ETC.) FOR AIR BARRIER AND RAA'RN SAL ALTS
RFWIREMOYTS. IP SUMP PUMP BASKET IB PROIIDEO THE OOlfR
FLOOR CANTILEVERS TO HAVE R-'•0 -ION IF ANY dKTWORI(1.
BEING PFOlIDED IN FLOOR IN TWE . IF p.X•.TWORIC IS PROJIDW,
GL'OTVIGRK LLCATTED Ti- ENVELOPE a1 THE NARY
. (TWE
SIDE W THE AIR BARRIER (SIDES t BEL0.N aKTWatK) WILL NFID
1.(
TO HAVE A MIN. OF R-30 BEttW DUCT.
DUCTWORK PROVIDED RI P12OR A94E1%1. WILL NEED TO BE
TESTED EOR DUCT TI__ WHEN DUCTWORK 15 LEGATED _DE
W
r
OF THE THERMAL ENVELOPE A TOTAL LEAKAGE TEST OF THE ENTIRE
OLCTWat1O SYSTEM SHALL M
pUCTWOWf LOCATED axT M OF THE THERMAL ENVELDPE 9VtALL CE
xy
IIYNUTED TO A MINIMM OF R -e.
NOTE• THE TEST® AIR LEAKAGE NE4 NOT IXCECD x.f AIR
EXdLVIG® PER IYNR.
� O
O O O
- -
-
PROJECT k: IWFIS
CUIG< <r7y
DRAWN BY: ARRC
.,.�_...,......--.._.,_�_
CHECKED BY: AJT
PRELIMSETDATE: APRIL 26, 2017
+:.OTU -('TYLE GE>ER%C
LO R T_¢.:>LL'LT G
BmSET DATR RUNE 22,2017
A LEVE. LA_'_! -C- � 0.1"B �CCID S'UD5
FINALSETDATU.
3�
UPPER LE NEL WDLL �'.: "3"yCOD a*..75
MA,N LEVEL FLOOR 5, 5T=;' SLAB ON &R1DE
)IRENTM. Aq 08.2017
"PEER L7'/=L FCCP 5.. 5`.EY, 3 R TR:55
I_
rTSF N. c- 'ICL,.N
WAIL SECT IONS Pe
E J\Dry C�i SG F -- =23 5F
SPECIFICATIONS
VEV=L cO O 5F 2455E
,PR LFIEL 502 EF 2331 5f
R -•G 2 •: 3• SF : 5F
ZE -R.CRcl E'_ 'E3 5P
„F.. _R E.R FCRO� (7-.... r,. eb
-
-2645-
0 •
Rea( People. Real Solutions.
September 6, 2017
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE: Commerce Boulevard (CSAR 110) Retaining Wall Project
Construction Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County
Dear Mayor and Members of the Council:
2638 Shadow Lane
Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318-1172
Ph: (952) 448-8838
Fax: (9521448-8805
Bolton-Menk.com
A contract was awarded to Barber Construction at the August 22nd Council meeting in the amount of
$258,355. Hennepin County has agreed to participate in the cost of the Commerce Boulevard portion of
this City project, which also includes the replacement of the wall adjacent to the Alano property on Eagle
Lane, north of Three Points Boulevard.
The proportionate share of the bid for the Commerce Boulevard wall is $236,368.70 and the County has
agreed to pay one-half of this cost ($118,18435) as well as 18% of this cost ($21,273.18) to cover their
share of the engineering and administrative costs for the project. The cost reimbursement will be based on
actual construction costs but the County's portion will not exceed $150,000.
A Construction Cooperative Agreement, No. PW 54-06-17, has been prepared and is attached detailing
City and County responsibilities, procedures and requirements. A Resolution approving this Cooperative
Agreement has been prepared for the Council's consideration.
Sincerely,
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
/f- 7
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
Senior Project Manager
H;\MOUN\C17114002\1 Corres\C_To Others\2017-09-06 Ltr to Council, Approve Coon Aermtxvith Henn Co.docx
Belton & Menk is-2646—iunity employs
• 1 • 1
1:44*41gligle •
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR
REPLACEMENT OF COMMERCE BOULEVARD (COUNTY HIGHWAY 110) RETAINING
WALL, FROM BALSAM ROAD TO GRANDVIEW BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, city staff has been working with the Hennepin County Public Works staff on ways to
replace the deteriorated timber retaining wall along the west side of Commerce Boulevard from
approximately Balsam Road to Grandview Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, it was mutually agreed that the City's engineer, Bolton & Menk, Inc. would prepare
plans for the replacement of these deteriorated walls; and
WHEREAS, County staff has reviewed and approved said plans; and
WHEREAS, the Retaining Wall Replacement project was publically advertised, bids received
and a contract awarded by the City on August 22"d in the amount of $258,355.00 to Barber
Construction; and
WHEREAS, the project includes City wall replacement on Eagle Lane, North of Three Points
Boulevard with the proportionate cost estimated at $21,986.30; and
WHEREAS, the County of Hennepin has prepared a Construction Cooperative Agreement
detailing cost sharing based on the Bid Award amount less the City wall portion of the bid;
responsibilities of both County and City staff; and various other procedural matters;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, that the
Construction Cooperative Agreement No. PW 54-06-17 for the replacement of the existing
timber retaining wall along the west side of Commerce Boulevard from near Balsam Road to
Grandview Boulevard in Mound, MN is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Manager are
authorized to sign said agreement, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution and further, be
it resolved by the City Council that the City Manager, staff and consultants are authorized to
take any and all necessary and convenient steps to implement the intent of this Resolution.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of September, 2017.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
-2647-
Mark Wegscheid, Mayor
HENNEPIN COUNTY
MINNESOTA
August 31, 2017
Ray Hanson
Public Works Superintendent
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT NO. PW 54-06-17
CSAR 110 RETAINING WAILS
Dear Mr. Hanson,
Enclosed are two copies of the cooperative agreement for the above referenced project. Please have
both copies of the agreement signed by the appropriate officials and return them to this office.
Also, please return two certified copies of a resolution authorizing these officials to sign the
agreement. Upon completion of the remaining signatures by Hennepin County officials, we will
send you a fully executed copy of the agreement for your files.
If you have any questions concerning the agreement, please call me at (612) 596-0380.
Sincerely,
Wayne Loos
Senior Administrative Assistant — Design
encl
Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery
Public Works Facility, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN 55430
hennepin.us -2648-
Hennepin
Agreement No. PW 54-06-17
County State Aid Highway 110
City of Nfound
County of Hennepin
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 20 ,
by and between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of
Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of Mound, a body politic and
corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the City and the County are coordinating the replacement of retaining walls along
the west side of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 110 (Commerce Boulevard) from approximately
180 feet south of Balsam Road to Grandview Boulevard as shown on the City's plans for City Project
PW 17-04; and
WHEREAS, above mentioned City Project PW I7-04 also includes the construction of
retaining walls along Eagle Lane, a municipal street; and
WHEREAS, the construction of retaining walls along CSAR 110 and Eagle Lane under City
Project PW 17-04 will hereinafter be referred to as the "Project"; and
WHEREAS, the City will be the lead agency for the Project, and will be responsible for
preparing the plans and specifications for the construction of the Project and will be responsible for the
construction administration of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City has received bids for the construction work for the Project in the amount
of Two Hundred Fifty Eight Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Five Dollars and No Cents (5258,355.00).
A copy of said estimate, marked Exhibit "A", is attached hereto and by this reference made apart
hereof; and
WHEREAS, the County will participate in its proportionate share of the construction,
engineering and administration costs to replace the retaining walls along CSAR 110 as shown in the
plans for the Project; and
EDEAS, said work has been carried out by the parties hereto under the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Section 162.17, Subdivision 1 and Section 471.59.
- 1 - -2649- INk
Agreement No. PW 54-06-17
CSAR 110
•
It is understood and agreed that the City or its agents shall be responsible for preparing the
necessary plans and specifications for construction of the Project, and shall obtain approval of said
plans and specifications from the County. It is further understood that the City shall enter into
contracts with the successful bidders for construction of the Project, administer the contracts and
perform the required engineering, materials testing and inspection all in accordance with said plans and
specifications.
The County's Transportation Operations Department Director and designated representatives
shall have the right, as the work progresses, to enter upon the job sites to make any inspections deemed
necessary and shall cooperate with the City Engineer and staff at their request to the extent necessary,
but will have no responsibility for the supervision of the work.
Upon completion of the Project, the City or its agents shall furnish the County with a complete
set of as -built plans certified as to their accuracy by the City's Project Engineer for the improvements
constructed along CSAH 110. Said as -built plans shall be furnished by the City at no cost to the
County.
M
The County agrees that the City may make changes in the plans or in the character of the Project
contract construction that are reasonably necessary to cause the construction to be in all things
performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. It is mer agreed by the County that the City may
enter into any change orders or supplemental agreements with the City's contractor for the performance
of any additional construction or construction occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or desirable
changes in plans, within the original scope of the Project contracts. These changes may result in an
increase or decrease to the County's cost participation estimated herein.
The County shall have the right to review any proposed changes to the plans and specifications as
they relate to the County's cost participation prior to the work being performed, and in those instances
where the proposed changes necessitate a re-engineering of the design and/or specifications, the City
shall submit the re -engineered design and/or specifications to the County. The County Engineer or
designated representatives shall have up to seven (7) working days to review any negotiated change
orders or supplemental agreements prepared by the City that affect the County's share of the construction
cost. If the County Engineer or designated representatives fails to notify the City within the seven (7)
working day period, the change orders or supplemental agreements shall be considered approved by the
County.
The County further agrees that it will participate in the settlement of any claims from the City's
Project contractor that involve delays attributable to unreasonable delays in approval by the County for
-2--2650- \NK_
Agreement No, PW 54-06-17
CSAH 110
plan or specification changes deemed necessary by the City's engineer or staff, The amount of the
County participation in any such claims shall be commensurate with the percentage of delay directly
attributable to the County's actions only and shall not include delay claims directly attributable to the
City.
H
The City also agrees that any contract let by the City or its agents for the performance of the
work included in the Project as provided herein shall include clauses that will: 1) Require the
Contractor to defend, indemnify, and hold the County and its officials, officers, agents and employees
harmless from any liability, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses including,
without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees, arising out of or by reason of the acts and/or omissions
of the said Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors; 2) Require the Contractor to be
an independent contractor for the purposes of completing the work provided for in this Agreement; and
3) Require the Contractor to provide and maintain insurance in accordance with the following:
1. Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with
Contractual Liability and Explosion, Collapse and Underground
Property Damage (XCU) Liability coverages:
2.
3.
Limits
General Aggregate $2,000,000
Products—Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000
Personal and Advertising Injury $1,500,000
Each Occurrence — Combined Bodily Injury and
Property Damage $1,500,000
Hennepin County shall be named as an additional insured for the Commercial General
Liability coverage with respect to operations covered under this Agreement.
Automobile Liability:
Combined Single limit each occurrence coverage or the
equivalent covering owned, non -owned, and hired
automobiles. $1,000,000
Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability:
A. Workers' Compensation Statutory.
If the Contractor is based outside the State of Minnesota,
coverages must apply to Minnesota laws.
B. Employer's Liability — Bodily injury by:
- 3 - -2651- `w&
Accident — Each Accident
Disease — Policy Limit
Disease — Each Employee
4. Professional Liability — Per Claim
Aggregate
Agreement No, PW 54-06-17
CSAR 110
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
The Professional Liability insurance shall be maintained continuously for a period of two
years after completion of the actual construction of the Project.
It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the above listed Professional Liability
insurance will not be required in any construction contract let by City if the City's Contractor is not
required to perform design engineering as part of said construction contract.
An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability coverages is an acceptable method to provide
the required insurance limits.
The above subparagraphs establish minimum. insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility
of the City's Contractor to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may be
needed in connection with said Project.
All insurance policies shall be open to inspection by the County and copies of policies shall be
submitted to the County upon written request.
IV
The County shall participate in its proportionate share of the construction (base bid plus
alternate), engineering and administration costs to replace the retaining walls along CSAR 110.
The County's cost participation to construct replacement retaining walls along CSAR 110 as
shown in the plans and specifications for the Project shall be fifty percent (50%). It is understood and
agreed that the County's proportionate share of the pro -rata pay items included in the Project shall be
ninety one point forty nine percent (91.49%) and shall remain unchanged throughout the life of this
Agreement.
It is further understood and agreed that the County will reimburse the City eighteen percent
(18%) of the County's participating share of the construction costs to construct replacement retaining
walls along CSAR 110 as its share of the engineering and administration costs for the Project.
For informational purposes only and as shown in Exhibit "A", the County's estimated cost share
to construct replacement retaining walls along CSAR 110 is $118,184.35 (fifty percent of $236,368.70)
and $21,273.18 (eighteen percent of $118,184.35) for engineering and administration for a total
estimated County cost share for the Project of $139,457.53.
- 4 - -2652- �v�
Agreement No. PW 54-06-17
CSAR 110
The City understands and agrees that the County's total cost participation for the Project shall
not exceed One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($150,000.00) without an amendment
to this Agreement.
It is understood that the amounts as shown in Exhibit "A" are estimates of the costs for the
contracted construction work included in the Project and that the actual prices set forth in the contract
with the successful bidders and the final quantities as measured by the City Engineer's designated
representatives shall govern in computing the total final contract construction cost for apportioning the
cost of the Project according to the provisions herein.
u
After an award by the City to the successful bidder on the Project, the City shall invoice the
County for ninety five (95) percent of the estimated contract construction, engineering and
administration costs the County is to pay the City as specified in Article IV herein.
It is understood by the parties that the County's share of the construction costs to be paid the City
upon award to the successful bidder will be based on actual contract unit prices applied to the estimated
quantities shown in the plans. Payments shall be made to the City by the County for the foil amount
due stated on the invoice within forty five (45) days of the invoice date.
In the event the City Engineer or staff determines the need to amend the construction contract
with a supplemental agreement or change order as stipulated in Article Il herein which results in an
increase in the contract amount for the Project, the County agrees to remit within forty five days (45)
days of notification by the City of the change an amount equal to ninety five (95) percent of the
estimated County share as documented in the supplemental agreement or change order.
The remainder of the County's respective share in the costs of the Project, including additional
costs resulting from supplemental agreements and change orders, will be due the City upon the
completion of the Project and submittal of the City Engineer's final estimate for the Project to the
County.
Upon final payment to the Project contractor by the City, any amount remaining as a balance in
the deposit account will be returned to the County, within 45 days, on a proportionate basis based on
the County's initial deposit amount and the County's final proportionate share of the Project costs.
Likewise, any amount due the City from the County upon final payment by the City shall be paid by the
County as its final payment for the construction costs of the Project within forty five days (45) days of
receipt of an invoice from the City.
0
It is further understood and agreed that upon completion of the Project the City, the retaining
walls and integral retaining wall fencing/railing included in the Project shall become the property of the
City. It is further understood and agreed that the City, at its sole cost and expense, will perform all
- 5 - -2653- \N;I....
Agreement No. PW 54-06-17
CSAH 110
routine maintenance on the retaining walls and retaining wall fencing/railing constructed as a part of
the Project. In the event, at any time in the future, that the retaining walls and integral retaining wall
fencing/railing constructed along CSAH 110 as a part of the Project are rehabilitated and/or replaced
the County agrees to participate in fifty (50) percent of the costs of said rehabilitation and/or
replacement.
All questions of maintenance responsibilities that may arise shall be jointly resolved by the City
Engineer and the County's Transportation Operations Department Director.
ffil
The City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County; its officials, officers, agents,
volunteers and employees, from any liabilities, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses,
costs or expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or
omission of the City, its contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for
whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable for related to the construction, ownership,
maintenance, existence, restoration, repair or replacement of the improvements constructed as part of
the Project.
The County agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents,
volunteers and employees, from any liabilities, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses,
costs or expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or
omission of the County, its contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone
for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable for related to the construction, ownership,
maintenance, existence, restoration, repair or replacement of the improvements constructed as part of
the Project.
MI
Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof, to the extent
authorized by the law, and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof
The County's and the City's liability are governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
466.
The County and the City each warrant that they are able to comply with the aforementioned
indemnity requirements through an insurance or self-insurance program.
Im
All records kept by the City and the County with respect to the Project shall be subject to
examination by the representatives of each party hereto.
- 6 - -2654- _\ r,,kk_
Agreement No, PW 54-06-17
CSAH 110
D
It is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the
City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the
City shall not be considered employees of the County, and that any and all claims that may or might
arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Minnesota Economic Security Law on behalf of said
employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any
act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided
to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the County.
Also, any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County in the
performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County
shall not be considered employees of the City, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under
the Worker's Compensation Act or the Minnesota Economic Security Law on behalf of said employees
while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or
omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be
rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City,
In order to coordinate the services of the City with the activities of the County so as to
accomplish the purpose of this Agreement, the County's Transportation Operations Department
Director or designated representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the County and shall
serve as liaison between the County and the City.
In order to coordinate the services of the County with the activities of the City so as to
accomplish the purpose of this Agreement, the City Engineer or designated representative shall manage
this Agreement on behalf of the City and shall serve as liaison between the City and the County,
M
It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and
that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the
subject matter hereof. All 'items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are
deemed to be part of this Agreement.
Any alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only
be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the
parties hereto.
I.f-1'11
The provisions of Minnesota Statutes 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to
civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action Policy statement of Hennepin County shall
7--2655-
�,��
Agreement No. Pyr 54-05-17
CSAR 110
be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.
an
The whereas clauses are incorporated herein and are hereby made a part of this Agreement.
(this space left intentionally blank)
- g - -2656-
Agreement No. PW 54-06-17
CSAR 110
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their
respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.
(Seal)
By:
Deputy/Clerk of the County Board
Date:
By:. —
A*istt County Attorney
Date:
By:
Assistant County Attorney
By:
Mayor
Date:
And:
Manager
Date:
By:
Chair of its County Board
And:
County Administrator
Date:
And:
Assistant County Administrator, Public Works
Date:
By:
Transportation Operations Department Direct
Date: Date:
-9--2657-
REVISED - SCHEDULE OF UNIT PRICES
2017 Retaining Wag Improvements
C1tY of Mound, Minnesota
BMl Project No. 017114002
BIDDER agrees to perform all of the work described in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS for the following unit pnces:
NOTE. BIDS shall include sales tax and applicable taxes and fees.
BIDDER must fill in unit prices in numerals, make extension for each item and total.
CU YD (LV) = Cubic Yards, Loose Volume -
CU YD (CV)= Cubic Yards. Compacted Volume (Measured in Place)
(EV) = Excavated Volume
(P) = Planned Quantity Basis of Measurement
8istfer. Barber Constructlon, Inc.
Item
No Bid item
EstimatesUnit Quantity
Price n
mTotal
ount
PART A: BASE BID
SECTION 1: GENERAL PRORATA
1 MOBILIZATION
LUMP SUM
1
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL
LUMP SUM
1
$3,000=
$3,000.00
SECTION 2: COMMERCE BLVD
3 CLEAR & GRUB BUSHES
LUMP SUM
1
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
4 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
LIN FT
100
$20,00 _
$2,000.00
5 REMOVE RETAINING WALL
LIN FT
1,040
_$9
,50
$9.880.00
6 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALK
SQ FT
4,900
$3,00
$14,700.00
7 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SQ YD
90$1�
0,00T
$900.00
8 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)
CU YD
245 _
$40.00
_ $9,800.00
9 AGGREGATE SURFACING CLASS 5 (DRIVEWAY) (100% CRUSHED)
TON
1D _
$30.00 _
$300.00
10 3.0" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY (W/ 6" AGG. BASE CL. 5)
SQ FT
800 _
$5.00
$4,000.00
11 TRUNCATED DOMES
SF
12 _
$100.00
$1,200.00
12 4" CONCRETE WALK (W! 4" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5)
SQ FT
3,500
, $7,65
$26,775.00
13 6" CONCRETE WALK/DRIVEWAY (WI 4" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5)
SQ FT
1,400
$14.00
$19,600.00
14 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN (ANY)
LIN FT
100 ____$55-00
$5,500.00
15 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL
SQ FT
3,600 `
$$0.50
$109,$00.40
16 WATER SERVICE LID COVER
EACH
2
_$300m
$600.00
17 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
EACH
11
$100.00
$1,100.00
18 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE STRAW
LIN FT
1,425
$— 2 00
$2,850.00
19 LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE
ALLOWANCE
—14,000,00
City oPMound - C17 114002 Hennepin COUtityAgreement PVI/ 54-06-,t 7
August 21, 2017 -2658- Exhibit "A"; Sheet i Of
Item
No. Bid Item
Unit
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Price
Total
Amount
SECTION 3: EAGLE LANE
20
REMOVE RETAINING WALL
LIN FT
130
$10.00
$1,300.00
21
REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALK
SQ FT
20
$20.00
$400.00
22
REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT
SQ YD
2
$100.00
$200.00
23
TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)
CU YO
15
$40.00
$600.00
24
3.0" BIFTUMINOUS DRIVEWAY (WI 6" AGG. BASE CL. 5)
SQ FT
25
$40.00
$1,000.00
25
4" CONCRETE WALK (W/4" AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5)
SQ Fr
50
$20.00
$1,000.00
26
MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL
SQ FT
400
$35.00
$14,000.00
27
STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION
EACH
1
$100.00
$100.00
28
SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE STRAW
LIN FT
140
$2.00
$280.00
29
LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE
ALLOWANCE
$1,000.00
SUBTOTAL PART A:
$247,885.00
PART C: ALTERNATE BID
SECTION 2: COMMERCE BLVD
34
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET CAT 3N W/ SEED MIX SPECIAL
SQ YD
550
$4.00
$2,200.00
35
HYDRAULIC MATRIX TYPE FIBER REINFORCED W/ SEED MIX SPECIAL
SQ YO
950
$5.00
$4,750.00
36
SCARIFY AND OVERSEER (SEED MIX SPECIAL)
SQ YD
760
$2,00
$1,520.00
37
HYbROPHILIC POLYMERS
LB
100
$10.00
$1,000.00
SECTION 3: EAGLE LANE
38
HYDRAULIC MATRIX TYPE FIBER REINFORCED W/ SEED MIX SPECIAL
SQ YD
90
$10.00
$900.00
39
HYDROPHILIC POLYMERS
LS
5
$20.00
$100.00
SUBTOTAL
PART C:
$10,470.00
City of Mound - C 17 114002
August 21, 2017
TOTAL ALTERNATE BID (A + C): $258,355.00
Hennepin County Agreement PVI/ 5"6-17
-2659- Exhibit "A",- Sheet 2 of 3
000 0L0 CY)
00 CN co
0I� M N�`- M 0IN Flo Ol 01 IcnicolcNic,
Lo c r N+T- IN I Ir Ir I �rIr�MI
COO NrNO r. r N O O
N N MIr O OIN CIO O Cl, —I" OI OI I"-,tICIo
rno
NNNN M co co O'ON(D M"tt O
Or m �I� M MIN N MIN 4i OIr �Ir MI �e~-ININIO
N N MI� rI0 0 rI� OIN � CIO rI OI Id�Id'IoIOIm
O MIN r rI(O O r1r r OIN CO OIN rI O/ '-iIm ILolo
U0
N
N
N
U
N Ci
d
m J
U�
U�
v
U
U�
iZ
U`w
0s
'
Q
N
LL N
lL
N
11.
N
Lt. N
LL
N
N
tL
- 0
�Q
tYp
�O
�Q
wQ
D
CCccw
w
U
:5;o
-P
U)
m
z
-266Q-
N
d
U
~p
D
Q
n.
w
D
Z
w
U
:5;o
Z
0
a
U
U)
Z
m
z
-266Q-
N
d
cn
U. O0LO0U')U')00N0)0(Y)
�
c`MUn0MN0rNM
a)N�YOCY)14
M' T
-
{y. O N
�t r r
r r
r
r
r
N
r
r
N¢
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
C
r y !V;
O O
ro
to
a)
�.
O
ro
O
_
C
U
Z�
j
.`
U
O
`
w
Y
ro
a)cn
a)
ro
Q
a
L c
N
ro
cu
C
=
aaa
fAa
a
ca
a
Na
ro
�
Oaaaaa
C�
aL
Q
..La
c» c
ro
c
O
0
ro
cLd
0
�-'
a)a)a)cwcca)cLa)wa)a)a)0a)`<
C
cLa
C
p
tL
C°
c
C C -C •C N ,e
cam'
r
v:
t— cu
-0 CL oa
c
0U-cn
a
(n
Umu':`
000
Cl.aF'
oQ
oa
0000a
a
ro
ro m
0
Z
a)—va)ro
L
L
O
rn0a)
L
..—
C
ro
v7
U
t0
C
Q
N
0f-
C
N
a�a
a)
u)
aaaaac rn
N N U N ro ai' �'
m
a
C
O a)
>�
°�
C
-
L
a
�'0
m�
,�
c
c
c
3
ca
3
c
a—
c
L
c c c c� �.;
a�
�'
w�
F /
U C
a) 4+
(q-0
U
a%
V
°-C
O
O
>
Q�
U
a�
QL
N
�_
t0
�• •
ro
L
f
ro
L
i-F-Yf-
ro
L
o
ro
L—
FYI-
O
ro
L
a)
—
(J
Crof-1-f-1-l-Z
ro
L
ro ro ro ro E
L L L L O
a?J
O
o
C
ca
j
0
Oz
v
v
U
o; N
F cn
U
Q m
O
O"
LO
C
C
k -s
"0
Z O
CU�S
J
O
❑=
O
ro
J
ro
J
00
p cc
ccuLL--
OUY
a)•L
�,
ro
ro
:
iz
a. CDC
o
0;;
(DUm
cntnc0WCO0)tocncncncncnW0)W0)
ro'
C
U
'
i
y
cr'
cr'
G
r2
r2
cc'
GC.
Vi
c
c Q
U
'
c
N
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w w w w w
U)
0—
a
C
N
a
C—
L
cu
CU
M
0
w UUQ
®
0
USLLU
N-
0`�UUU
°
O
QdQ'
N
N
N
N
N
S
S
=
S
2
=
®
w
=
a)
0
0
0
N
a)
a)
v
a)
a)
0
0 0 0 0 0
W
L
L L L
L
L
L
L
L
L
N
a
U
a
U
�
U
a
U
a
U
�
U
a
U
a
U
:
U
c
U
a � c � �aL
U U U 0 U w L
La)
m
ii
ii E M
E
E
ii
E
E
E
li
E
Nnnmn
a)
a
a)
a)
a)
nU)
0
a)
n(1)cn
a)
a)
a)
U)N
a)
(1) cn nN�
a) a) a) a) a) it
ii
U-
pLL
N
S
R
O
vi
N
0
CL
ti
"a
'a
=Q c
>>(D70—D
o
ro
ro
c
>
a
Co
N-
N
c
as
raa)aa
k
Co
c>
>
a�
cmw-o?m
>
CU
0
a) .0yoa
a> c m c w >
L
ro
'=
o
o'
COM
O
0
c
J
.'
O"
ro
.)
c
0
�'
romm
-I
a)
OJ
Wa
ro ro
m J � m
❑m0
in a)m❑a)L
LO
C`
c
�-
a`
a)
~`
a)
a)
2
2
2
N
2
O
m
NJ
O a) c� C
a)
a)
5
,}
W
ro' °)
o
°1c°nc�n
m
aai
�—°o
°
ro
a)
a
°)
3
,?
ami °aa'°0 a cc>
ami°
IY EE2EEccitsEv
c
0)o=
.c
EEcEroLx
aai
nro0a'r' =-a
cn
!0'
❑ U
❑ >,
ro 0 E
m 0
c
0❑
N
•-
O
E
O
a)
�
a
Z
ro
U
Y
ro
J
O
U
U
C7
>+
ro
m
a
a
E
O
E
o
S
p
E
O
Y
C
O
N
E
N m c _a}
f- ZG L ro _—
� J
c
o
w
(n
Q
to (}
c
0
x?�i�i�i��(x
O
CA
U
UxU
E
O
r
N
U.)O�X
U) N
N
O
Lo
r
O
XXX07G.
N
N
N
N
10LO
U
Xpj
N
X
M
C
�
IL
N
N
a
a a a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
s
a
a
s
a
a
a a
Q
a
c
c c c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
a
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c a c c
c c c c c c
c
c
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
V�22Z>22
2222222222M21-5222
r•tir`ti
r-
r
r.
r
r.
r
r.
r
r.
r
r.
r
r.
r
r.
r
r•r-r•r.r.
r.
r
r•
r
r•
r
r-
r
r,
r
r-
r
r• r. r. r. r• ter.
r r r r r
�
r
W r
O
r r r
O O O
000d0000
r
O
r
O
r
O
r
O
r
O
00000000000
r
d
r
d
0
F_
NNN(N
N
N
N
N
N
..�.,.�
N
N
N
NNNNN��.�.000lNQ—NQQ
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N N N N NNS
N
Q
❑®
O
r
r is:z
r
r
r
r
N
0 UC)
N
N
O
M
r
M
U)`
e
�
w
�
r
r
r
r
N
r
M
0
r
r O O
co co co M
Un
r
a0 00
co co 00
00
00
``
w
w
w 00
M
00
M
M
0 00
'•.
00
--
00 co
—
�`
co
-
00 00
00
� — � 00
00 00 00 0
0 co
Wto
�O r LO0wmcor
O)Cpa)NCOOM
wmmm0r
d
O
—2
1—�mmr
IM
U<70MUA
r
tir
fT
�
oo0o0od000
v.0t-co'o0r
M�p
�nmr
a)
Z MMMMMMMMMM
ct
M
1
MM
MMM
MMM
MMcp
�-'- d MMM
Mound Fire Department
City of Mound
January - August, 2017
Fire Alarm / False Alarm Report
Fire
No
Date
Address
Alarm Type
Fire Smoke CO
Activity or Action Taken
False Pre -
Alarm veritable
10
1/8/2017
5967 Idlewood Road
x
CO levels found
N
Y
18
1/11/2017
2590 Commerce Blvd
x
Nothing found
Y
Y
20
1/12/2017
5600 Grandview Blvd
x
Extinguished Fire
N
Y
36
1/30/2017
4743 Richmond Road
x
CO levels found
N
N
44
2/8/2017
2020 Commerce Blvd
x
Set off by construction
Y
Y
50
2/13/2017
5227 Bartlett Blvd
x
Cancelled enroute
N
Y
65
2/24/2017
2020 Commerce Blvd
x
Set off by construction
Y
Y
88
3/13/2017
2020 Commerce Blvd
x
Set off by construction
Y
Y
90
3/15/2017
2670 Commerce Blvd
x
Reset alarm
N
Y
96
3/20/2017
2020 Commerce Blvd
x
Burnt Food
N
Y
97
3/22/2017
2131 Commerce Blvd
x
Cancelled - on site testing
Y
Y
99
3/24/2017
2333 Wilshire Blvd
x
Alarm Reset
N
Y
128
4112/2017
2451 Fairview Lane
x
Cancelled upon arrival
N
Y
133
4/17/2017
2948 Pelican Point Circle
x
Replaced Battery
N
Y
134
4/18/2017
2308 Driftwood Lane
x
Burnt Food
N
Y
149
4/29/2017
2333 Wilshire Blvd
x
Canceled enroute
Y
Y
202
6/5/2017
5308 Three Points Blvd
x
Fire in Garage - Extinguished
N
Y
204
6/5/2017
2451 Fairview Lane
x
Child pulled pull station
Y
Y
218
6/9/2017
2020 Commerce Blvd
x
Set off by construction
Y
Y
244
6/11/2017
2501 Commerce Blvd
x
Faulty Detector
N
N
262
6/21/2017
5616 Grandview Blvd
x
Low Battery
N
Y
263
6/22/2017
2020 Commerce Blvd
x
Cancelled enroute
Y
Y
270
6/25/2017
5600 Grandview Blvd, #213
x
Nothing Found
N
Y
272
6/25/2017
2650 Lakewood Lane
x
Cancelled (burnt food)
N
Y
281
6/28/2017
2150 Old School Road, #251
x
Low Battery
N
Y
286
7/1/2017
2020 Commerce Blvd
x
Set off by Burnt Food
N
Y
300
7/7/2017
4939 Grandview Blvd
x
Replaced Battery
N
Y
308
7/9/2016
2020 Commerce Blvd
x
Burnt Food
N
Y
310
7/10/2017
2020 Commerce Blvd
x
Set off by construction
Y
Y
327
7/19/2017
2133 Cedar Lane
x
Low Battery
N
Y
345
7/29/2017
1545 Bluebird Lane
x
Cancelled
Y
Y
393
8/25/2017
2141 Commerce Blvd
x
Set off by pressure washer
Y
Y
366
8/9/2017
2020 Commerce Blvd
x
Set off by construction
Y
Y
364
8/8/2017
4646 Island View Drive
x
Low Battery
N
Y
379
8/15/2017
3136 Wested a Blvd
x
Changed Batteries
N
Y
353
8/4/2017
3002 Highland Blvd
x
Alarms System Malfunction
Y
N
359
8/7/2017
5340 Shoreline Drive
x
Accidental Pull Station
Y
Y
2017 YTD TOTALS
J:\admin\REPORTS - Fire Incident & Performance\2017 Performance Reports\2017 Fire Alarm - False Alarm Reports by City
ZINMITiP
Vice Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Vice Chair David Goode; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David
Pelka, and Philip Velsor. Absent: Cindy Penner, Jameson Smieja, Jennifer Peterson, and Jake
Saystrom. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planners
Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Field Officer Stewart Simon, and Secretary Jill Norlander.
Members of the public: Jayme Quinnell, 5378 193`d St W, Farmington; Joseph & Marjana
Schwebel, 15 Orme La, St. Paul; Brian Blake, 101 Peavey La, Wayzata; Barb Fritsch, 101 Peavey
La, Wayzata; Jim Bruns, 2630 Setter Cir; Johnny Range, 2039 Arbor La; Jeremy Nelson, 2060
Waterside La; KC Nelson, 6500 Phoenix, Golden Valley; Tom McDonnell, 5239 Washburn Ave S,
Mpls; Michelle Olson, 2060 Waterside La
Staff added 3 handouts to the agenda.
MOTION by Bussey, second by Baker, to approve the agenda as presented. MOTION carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Baker, second by Bussey, to approve the July 18, 2017 meeting minutes as
presented. MOTION carried unanimously.
PLANNING CASE NO. 17-26 VARIANCE —UNDEVELOPED LOT OF RECORD
2025 LAKESIDE
-V O •
Sarah Smith reviewed the application as follows:
• Lot is part of original plat
• Proposing to build a single-family home with conforming setbacks
• Property owners on both sides indicate support by letter
-2663-
Planning Commission Minutes
August 15, 2017
® Lot is undersized for R-1 zone but exceeds the minimum for R -1A and R-2 zone
(6,000 square feet)
• There is an existing structure and water and sewer is stubbed to the lot
• Other undersized lots in the neighborhood
• Property owner intends to retain the existing accessory structure
• Hardcover will be under the 40% maximum
• Staff recommends approval
Bussey questioned the ordinary high water setback and building height. Smith confirmed that
setback and height would be conforming.
MOTION by Pelka, second by Velsor, to recommend approval of the variance as recommended
by staff with conditions 1-9 and findings of fact 1-9. MOTION carried unanimously.
PLANNING CASE • 17-27 VARIANCE — FRONT LOADEDDETACHED GARAGE
0, NORTHERN ROAD
APPLICANT: TOM McDOUGALL
Sarah Smith reviewed the application as follows:
• Previous variance approvals include: lot line setback, parking area/drive location,
driveway width, number of parking stalls, walkway material, and planting and
landscaping along property lines
• Proposing a front loaded garage (same structure previously approved, but
modified from side loaded to front loaded)
• Twenty -foot setback is required along Northern Rd
• Side setback will improve to 10 feet and hardcover will also improve
• Property owners on both sides indicate support by letter
• Improved maneuverability
• Consistent with original approvals
• Structure is further back from road with modified proposal
• Staff recommends approval
Velsor questioned the location of the easterly driveway/parking area.
Tom McDougall (5239 Washburn Ave S, Mpls) stated that the project was started last fall. The
existing driveway along Northern Road was all asphalt. It will be cut back and will bring the
hardcover down to 40 percent as a part of this upcoming project.
MOTION by Bussey, second by Pelka, to recommend approval of the variance as recommended
by staff with conditions 1-10 and findings of fact 1-9. MOTION carried unanimously.
Planning Commission Minutes 3 August 15, 2017
PLANNING CASE • 17-28 VARIANCE— HOUSE REMODEL/ADDITION PR•
2039 ARBOR LANE
JOHN RANGE
Laura Chamberlain reviewed the application as follows:
• Lakefront property, existing lot of record, 8,643 SF, zoned R1A, built in 1972
• Variance from sideyard setback for an addition off the front of the current home,
extending over the garage
• Orientation of the home slightly askew to the side lot line
• Existing home is 6 feet from side yard; new addition will be 5.8 feet at closest
point
• Existing hardcover is 44.1% and shall be maintained
• Staff recommends approval
Bussey asked if it was only the second level that encroaches. The applicant clarified that the
proposed addition will extend over the front walkway to the house on pillars. The first level
support pillars as well as the second floor will encroach into the setback area.
Bussey asked about the height requirements. Chamberlain indicated that the proposed
structure is conforming.
Velsor asked the applicant about the plan for the hardcover.
John Range, 2039 Arbor Lane, stated that the preferred plan is to change some hardcover into
permeable pavers. However, that would not be able to be completed until after the addition
was completed. If the hardcover reduction needs to be addressed sooner, then they would
remove a portion of the driveway.
MOTION by Bussey, second by Velsor, to recommend approval of the variance as
recommended by staff subject to conditions 1-8 and findings of fact 1-3. MOTION carried
unanimously.
PLANNING CASE NO. .• r ADDITION
3231 GLADSTONE LANE
JAYME QUINNELL •JOE SCHWEBEL
Laura Chamberlain reviewed the application as follows:
• Deck setback into the 50' Lakeshore setback
• Zoned R01, existing lot of record, 12,259 sf, built in 1962
• Deck on lakeside to replace existing which encroaches 2.6 feet into the 50 foot
setback; new deck encroaches 5.6 feet
Planning Commission Minutes 4 August 15, 2017
As this is a covered deck it counts toward hardcover; proposed 33.3% is within
maximum for a lot of record
• Narrow lot with angle of Lakeshore in relation to side lot lines
• Determined that bluff on property that has been disturbed; 10 foot setback from
top of bluff required but likely house and deck already constructed within bluff
area Bluff variance required to allow for project.
Bussey asked if there was a difference between bluff setback and Lakeshore setback.
Chamberlain explained the difference.
Goode asked about property owner comments. Smith said abutting property owners were
notified of the variance request and she was contacted with questions about the project.
Bussey wanted to know if the entire deck was covered. Chamberlain said that the portion that
is covered is already calculated into the hardcover.
Jayme Quinnell, 5378 193rd St w Farmington, said that the roof goes out to the corner of the
deck. The radius corner of the deck sticks out beyond the roof.
MOTION by Baker, second by Velsor, to recommend approval of the variance as recommended
by staff with conditions 1-8 and findings of fact 1-6. MOTION carried unanimously.
PLANNING ,D 17-22 (VARIANCE)
2060 WATERSIDE LANE
APPLICANT:•
Rita Trapp reviewed the application as follows:
• Existing lot of record; 18,815 square foot lot on corner of Waterside and Spruce
• Waterside Lane is between the house and the lake , so subject property is not
lakeshore lot
• Proposing construction of a second level over the house and garage; decks on
the front and side; and, two, two-story additions on the rear of the home
• Located in the R -1A zoning district; existing lot of record built in 1954
• Expansion permit is required for the second floor addition for the front yard
setback, north rear corner, and Spruce side yard setback
• Variance approval for the non -conforming Spruce Road setback due to
construction of the proposed two-story deck on the side of the home
• Staff recommends approval with conditions and findings of fact
Velsor asked if the columns are going to encroach closer to Spruce and Waterside than the
existing. Trapp deferred to the applicant.
...
Planning Commission Minutes 5 August 15, 2017
Bussey confirmed that the expansion is expanding upward on the existing non-conformance for
the expansion permit and the variance is for side deck. Trapp agreed.
Bussey asked if the setback requirements include stairs. Trapp stated that stairs have separate
requirements.
Jeremy Nelson (2100 Mary Hills Dr, Golden Valley) responded that the columns are existing; the
footings are large enough to support the two-story deck. They will be extended upward.
MOTION by Baker, second by Bussey, to recommend approval of the expansion permit as
recommended by staff with conditions 1-8 and findings of fact 1-5. MOTION carried
unanimously.
MOTION by Baker, second by Bussey, to recommend approval of the variance as recommended
by staff with conditions 1-8 and findings of fact 1-3 noting that the requested setback was 23.3
feet. MOTION carried unanimously.
A. 2040 Mound Comprehensive Plan Project Land Use/Market/Focus (Trapp)
Planning consultants Trapp and Chamberlain discussed with the Planning Commission the
components of the land use chapter, market conditions, market trends, and land uses for three
focus areas in the community. Highlights of the presentation included the following:
Market Overview - Demographics
• Small growth is projected in Mound
• More household growth than pop due to declining household size
• Minnetrista will grow the most of neighbors; this may contribute to need for goods and
services in Mound
Employment
• Current forecasts estimate a growth of 700 jobs in Mound; additional discussion with
the Met Council anticipated after the draft future land use plan developed
• Mound has not been center for jobs for decades
• Additional jobs would support demand for shopping and places to eat
Market Trends
Retail
• Higher vacancy rates than overall metro and west
• Mound tends to service day to day needs
O
Planning Commission Minutes
August 15, 2017
National trend of retail consolidation, increase in online shopping, and a reduction of
retail square footage will continue to impact Mound
Office
• Very limited, primarily small business and medical
• Unlikely Mound will see significant increase
Multi -Family Residential
• Inventory remain stable of last decade
• Additional demand anticipated due to changing household composition (living alone,
single parents)
Suggested direction based on market trends
• Limited area for new develop; most will be redevelopment
• Need for variety of housing types to accommodate change
• Redevelop areas appropriate locations to explore townhomes and multi family
• Retail footprint should decrease over time
• Limited potential for significant office or industrial development
• Redevelop areas may include a small amount of retail, focus should be on building
residential base of the community
Focus Areas
The City has identified a number of focus areas to explore as part of the comprehensive
planning process. Three will be focus of discussion at this meeting: Langdon, Harbor and Eden.
The remainder will be discussed at an upcoming meeting. For each focus area the consultants
reviewed the existing land uses in the area and what was considered as potential land uses
were explored. A few concepts for each focus area were presented to provide the Planning
Commission with a sense of what could be possible. Planning Commission discussion focused
on providing direction on the appropriate types of land uses and potential design
characteristics that should be considered.
Langdon
• More residential than commercial - appropriate uses would include townhomes and
multi -family
• Commercial or mixed-use along Commerce would make sense - small commercial node
adjacent trail higher priority
• Streetscape along Commerce important - desire for walkability - feeling of separation
from street, parking behind buildings
• Further discussion about building height may be warranted as this area may be able to
support higher buildings as a means to have more open space
Planning Commission Minutes 7 August 15, 2017
Harbor
• Residential likely to include townhomes and multi -family
• Structure along Commerce likely to be mixed-use or multi -family with multiple stories
• Desire for walkability along Commerce and through site
• Desire for public component on site to provide public gathering and/or amenities that
would be draw to area
• Open to a different road network that would help reduce cut -through use of Auditors
Road
• Building height in this area may also be taller to support site design
Eden
• Hard to envision this area transitioning given the number of property owners
• Open to idea of transitioning site to residential if market interest
• Commercial most desired on west and near Shoreline
• Residential uses appropriate may range from multi -family near Shoreline to townhomes
to small -lot single-family near Shirley Hills.
• District height recommended to be maintained at 35 feet as this area is outside of
Downtown
B. Staff / City Council Liaison Report / Update - Community Development Director Smith
• Surfside informational sign request was withdrawn
• Smith will be out of the office 9/1- 919
• Possible 1-2 land use applications are pending for September meeting
MOTION by Goode, second by Bussey, to adjourn at 9:50 pm. MOTION carried unanimously.
Submitted by Jill Norlander
Ilk.
:WM,
.
The snowmobile account is funded from two primary sources: state gas tax revenue from snowmobile
use, which is about $7.2 million/year; and snowmobile registration fees (ranging from $3.8 to $7
million/year). Snowmobile registration revenue goes up or down depending on the following:
• Weather variability, such as good/bad snow years
• The number of snowmobile registrations up for renewal, which are impacted by the 3 -year
cycle (e.g., some years there are more snowmobiles up for renewal than other years)
• The overall number of snowmobiles registered, which has declined over the last 10 years from
a high of 277,000 sleds in 2006 to 196,000 sleds in 2016.
This variability in revenue has brought an element of unpredictability to the fund balance in the
snowmobile account. During years when the revenue is low and the account balance is in danger of
going "in the red," budget adjustments are necessary. By state law, the snowmobile account cannot
go below zero.
..•_...%. i • 1'� •: •.•. •
Starting July 1, 2017 snowmobile fees increased for the 3 -year registration ($105) and out-of-state
trail pass ($50). This fee increase helped to stabilize the snowmobile account against projected deficits
and allowed GIA funding to avoid a nearly 20% reduction to all grants.
The increased fees are expected to bring in about $1.5 million in additional funds in FY18 and $2
million in FY19. In the 3 -year registration cycle, FY18 is a low year for renewals, and without the
increases the snowmobile account would have significantly gone in the red.
Base grants will remain the same in FY18 as they were in FY17. The 4th benchmark reduction last year
ensured that the account balance stayed above zero in FY17 and the increased fees helped to avoid a
significant funding reduction in FY18. However, there still is the unpredictability of the upcoming
winter. In the event that there is less revenue than projected, the Yd and/or 4th benchmarks may not
be paid. Clubs should make sure to budget for this possibility. Think snow!
A one-year general fund supplement of $130,000 to the GIA Program was approved during the 2017
legislative session. This supplement is being allocated equally across all GIA grants as a 1.7% funding
increase above their base grants. Clubs can find the amount of their base grants and this funding
supplement in the GIA grant spreadsheet on the GIA webpage or by contacting their area supervisor.
Page 1 of 1 -2670- Updated 8/14/2017
-2671-
Revised 08/4/2017 Page 1 of 1
FY 2018
DNR
TRAIL
FY 2018
FY 2018
FY 2018 BASE
SUPPLEMENT
Club Miles
FY 2018 TOTAL
SPONSOR
CLUB/TRAIL NAME
MILE
GPS
snot
AREA
MAP #
FUNDING
($130k General
FUNDING
RATE
MILES*/**
funded)
Fund, 1.79%)
ANOKA CO
3B
83
Kiwi Krossing
$ 310
60.4
$ 18,724.O0
$ 335.16
$ 19,059.16
ANOKA CO
13B
84
Rice Creek
$ 310
73.6
$ 22,816.00
$ 408.41
$ 23,224.41 -
ANOKA CO
13B
85
Rum River
$ 310
70.5
$ 21,855.00
$ 391.20
$ 22,246.20 -
CHISAGO CO
313
106
Wild River
$ 310
114.9
$ 35,619.00
$ 637.58
$ 36,256.58 13.6
North Branch Sno
CHISAGO CO
3B
107
$ 310
46.2
$ 14,322.00
$ 256.36
$ 14,578.36
Drifters
CHISAGO CO
3B
108
Rush City Sno Bugs
$ 310
54.7
$ 16,957.00
$ 303.53
$ 17,260.53 -
Inver Grove Heights
DAKOTA CO
3B
122
$ 310
9.9
$ 3,069.00
$ 54.94
$ 3,123.94 -
Connection
DAKOTA CO
3B
123
Dakota County Trails
$ 310
127.8
$ 39,618.00
$ 709.16
$ 40,327.16 14.8
DAKOTA CO
3B
124
Waterford Warriors
$ 310
56.4
$ 17,484,00$
312.96
$ 17,796.96 -
RANDOLPH, CITY OF
3B
125
Randolph Trail
$ 310
22.8
$ 7,068.00
$ 126.52
$ 7,194.52 -
Cambridge/Weber/Stark/
ISANTI CO
3B
138
$ 310
47.2
$ 14,632.00
$ 261.91
$ 14,893.91 -
Isanti
Northern
ISANTI CO
3B
139
Light/Grandy/Bock
$ 310
48.0
$ 14,880.00
$ 266.35
$ 15,146.35 -
ISANTI CO
3B
140
Mystic Trails
$ 310
147.0
$ 45,570.00
$ 815.70
$ 46,385.70 -
SCOTT CO
3B
208
Scott County Sno Trail
$ 310
236.5
$ 73,315.00
$ 1,312.34
$ 74,627.34 7.3
WASHINGTON CO
3B
216
Star Trail
$ 310
139.7
$ 43,307.00
$ 775.20
$ 44,082.20 -
LAKEVILLE, CITY OF
3B
223
LakeViile Sno Trackers
$ 310
56.3
$ 17,453.00
$ 312.41
$ 17,765.41 3.5
HENNEPIN CO
3B
224
Northwest Trails
$ 310
115.6
$ 35,836.00
$ 641.46
$ 36,477.46 -
CARVER CO
3B
225
Southwest Trails
$ 310
99.3
$ 30,783.00
$ 551.02 1
$ 31,334.02 13.1
-2671-
Revised 08/4/2017 Page 1 of 1
MADDEN.
c ,
ATTORNEYS AT a
Frank J. Madden
Susan K. Hansen
Pamela R. Galanter (Retired)
August 1, 2017
Mr. Eric Hoversten
City Manager
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364-1668
Re: Rates
Dear Mr. Hoversten:
7760 France Avenue South, Suite 290
Bloomington, Minnesota 55435-5834
Telephone 763.545.2525
Facsimile 952.999.4789
Please be advised that we are proposing to increase our rates for Labor Relations matters to
$150.00/hr and for Arbitration/Administrative Hearings to $160.00/hour.
We appreciate the opportunity and look forward to continue working with you.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
FJM:Imn
Frank J. Madden
-2672-
Via USPS
August 28, 2017
Dear City Official:
Theresa Sunde
Senior Manager, Government Relations
Pursuant to FCC regulations governing cable television, I am informing you that effective at
the end of September, Mediacom Communications will be making changes to our High
Definition channel lineup. The following bill and digital converter message will be sent to our
customers:
On or around September 28th, Mediacom will add QVC HD to channel 814. A digital ready
HDTV, HD receiver, HID digital adapter or cable card is required to view. Call 855-224-2253
for more information.
KTCA will upgrade KTCA TPT Wx on channel 101 to a high definition format on September
19th. As a result, this channel will only be available in HD and will require a digital ready
HDTV, a Mediacom HD receiver or adaptor. Call 855-224-2253 for more information.
Please call me with any questions or concerns at 507-837-4878 or email me at
tsunde@mediacomcc.com.
Thank you,
Saint Peter Headend
Mediacom Communications Corporation
1504 2nd Street SE, PO Bo -2673 -Waseca, Minnesota 56093