The URL can be used to link to this page

79-10-09 CITY OF MOUND Mound~ Minnesota AGENDA CM 79-367 CH 79-368 CH 79-364 CM 79-371 CM 79-365 CM 79-366 CM 79,372 CH 79-374 CM 79-375 CM 79-370 CH 79-369 CM 79-373 CM 79-376 Hound City Council OctOber 9f 1979 City H~ll 7~30 P~M. !~ Minutes. pg. 2887-2889 2~ Public.Hearings A, ~treet Vacation-Cumberland Road from Stratford to Tuxedo Pg.2886 B~ Vacation'of Essex Lane from Cumberland to Manchester Pg..2884-2885 C, Special Use Permit Pg. 2881~2883 D, Revepue.Sharing Budget Pg~ 2880 E, Delinquent Utility Bills' ..Pg, 2878-2879 3: Plaqning Commission Recommendations Pg~ 2857-2877 47 Street~Construction A= Lakewood La~e Pg~ 2856 B. Monmouth Road Pg. 2855 C~ Other 5, Comments & Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) 6. Park CommissiQn Minutes Pg. 2852-2854 7. 1980 Budget Pg. 2849-2851 8. 1980 Salaries Pg. 2847-2848 9, Accounting Clerk Salary Pg. 2845-2846 10. Request for Wine License Pg. 2844 11. Payment of Bills 12. Information Memorandums/Misc. Pg. 2822-2843 13. Committee Reports Page 2890 26 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL October 2, 1~7~ Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota was held at. 5341Maywood Road' in said City on October 2, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. Those present wer'e: Mayor Tim Lovaasen, Councilmembers Gordon Swenson, Benjamin Withhart and Donald Ulrick. Absent and excused was Councilmember Robert Polston. Also present were City Manager Leonard L. Kopp, City Engineer Wm. McCombs and City Clerk Mary H. Marske. MINUTES The minutes of the meeting of September 11, 1979 were presented fOr consideration'. Swenson moved and Ulrick' seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the meeting of September 11, 1979 with the correction on page 113 adding after Resolution 79-367 "Councilmember Ulrick requested no further Industrial Revenue Bonds be considered until a policy is established". The vote was unanimously in favor. The minutes of the meeting of September 18, ~979 were presented for consideration Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion to appprove the minutes of the meeting of September 18, 1979 as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. The minutes of the meeting of September 25, 1979 were presented for consideration. Withhart moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the meeting 'of September 25, 1979 as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. WESTONKA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS Phyllis Jessen representing the Westonka League of Women Voters appeared before the Council to present two copies of the League Study of Local Government. The Mayor expressed the City's appreciation, for the efforts put forth by the League. STREET CONSTRUCTION Lakewood Lane The Mayor opened the meeting for input from Lakewood Lane residents regarding the current construction project. The following persons offered comments or questions: Don Jerdee, 2521Lakewood Lane Fred Hanley, 2511Lakewood Lane Rock Lindlan, 2561Lakewood Lane Jim Lassek, 2431Wilshire Boulevard John Seagard, 2531Lakewood Lane Withhart moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-416 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO SUBMIT AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN OF THE SAFEST AND NARROWEST INTER- SECTION POSSIBLE AT LAKEWOOD LANE AND WILSHIRE BLVE. The vote was three in favor with Swenson voting nay. 1978 STREETS Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-417 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CHANGE ORDER #4 TO RECONSTRUCT THE CURB AND ROAD SURFACE IN FRONT OF 1717 FINCH LANE The vote was unanimously in favor. CHANGE ORDER #5 -CUMBERLAND LANE The assistant engineer explained that they have been unable to obtain a necessary easement and suggested that no action be taken at this time. The Council concurred. October ~, 1579 RETAINING WALL REQUEST - DEVON LANE Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-418 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOHHENDATION OF THE CITY ENGINEER TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL AT 4810 DONALD DRIVE The vote was unanimously in favor. AVALON EASEMENT Withhart moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-419 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EASEMENT AT RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY ENGINEER ON LOT 6, 7, 8 6 9 AND LOTS 18, 19, 20 AND 21, BLOCK 14, AVALON.. The vote was three in favor with Lovaasen voting nay. CHANGE IN PARKING AREA Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-420 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CHANGE OF PLACEMENT AND TYPE OF FENCE AS REQUIRED BY PREVIOUS COUNCIL RESOLUTION The vote was unanimously in favor. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTION FROM CITIZENS PRESENT Mr. Pflug asked about the progress in the commercial zoning ordinance. L.O.G.I.S. Withhart moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion I RESOLUTION 79-421 RESOLUTION APPROVING A JOINT AGREEMENT WITH L.O.G.I.S. · The vote was unanimously in favor. PUBLIC HEARING DATE Lovaasen moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-422 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE VACATION OF PART OF KILDARE ROAD TO BE HEARD ON NOVEMBER 6, 1979 AT 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. OH SALE BEER LICENSE Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-423 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF AN ON SALE BEER LICENSE TO BRANTY'S. The vote was unanimously in favor. 1980 BUDGET The Council determined to continue this item to the next meeting. SEWER AND WATER BOND LEVY CANCELLATION Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-424 RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR NOT TO LEVY FOR SEWER AND WATER BONDS FOR THE YEAR 1980 The vote was unanimously in favor. TRANSFER OF FUNDS Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-425 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE TRANSFER OF CERTAIN CITY FUNDS The vote was unanimousJy in favor. ~ ~ ~/~dc/ October 2, 1979 PAYMENT OF BILLS Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion to approve payment of the bills as submitted on th~ prelist in the amount of $69,896.72 where funds are avail- able. ~oll call vote was unanimously in favor. ADJOURNMENT Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion to adjourn to the next regular meeting on October 9, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. The vote was 'unanimously in favor, so adjourned. Mary H. Marske CMC, City Clerk/Treasurer Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager 10 79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 3, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-367 SUBJECT: Street Vacation - Cumberland Road from Stratford to Tuxedo The above request came about as a result of constructing a cul-de-sac at the end of Inverness Lane. 'The area to be vacated is from the west side of Stratford to the cul-de- sac and from the east side of the cul-de-sac to Tuxedo Boulevard. 1. Easement should be maintained for utilities in Cumberland. 2. Cumberland should be vacated eastward only to the point right-of-way of Tuxedo is constructed. 3. All utilities except Northern States Power Company have said no use is required of the right-of-way. NSP has not replied. 4. At this writing, all of the right-of-way easemen~ for the cul-de-sac have not been signed. . -> ~ ' ~ ' ROlO ' &,eonard L. Ko~p~- /~ Ii 6 54 3 2 Io -, - ..,i. ,~ CUMBERLAND 10-9-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 3, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-368 SUBJECT: Vacation of Essex Lane from Cumberland to Manchester Roads The City Council recommended the subject vacation. The following have been received from the Utility Companies: 1. Minnegasco - no objection to vacation. 2. Continental Telephone - No need for street. 3. McCombs-Knutson - see no reason why Essex between Cumberland and Manchester cannot be vacated. All properties abutting the street could be served from another street. There are no utilities in the street and the right-of-way is not needed for storm sewer, drainage or utility easements and the grade of the property is too steep for future street construction. 4. Public Works - "no utilities in this right-of-way and its steep- ness makes it unusable as a road". 5. Police Department - no objection. 6. Fire Chief has said they object to any vacations. ' MANCHESTER, 6-26-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 22, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-224 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land - Lots 16, 17, 18 & 1/2 of 19, Block 8, Wychwood The subject lots are tax forfeit and have been held off sale for some reason. The area is zoned Residential B for duplexes. In the 3% lots, there is 11,200 square feet; 800 square feet short of a double site. These lots were discussed at the time the tax forfeit list was considered. Inasmuch as this is 800 square feet short of being two building sites, a duplex could be built on 11,200 square feet. Due to the contour of the land, i.t might be better that a duplex be built on this land~ However, with the sale of land, it cannot be determined that a buyer would build a duplex. The Council may want to release the lots as one piece or release Lots 16 and 17 and hold 18 and 1/2 of 19 off sale until possibly the .owner of the other half of 19, asks for a private sale. Does the Council wish to act on these? cc: Ronald Goodman -9-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 3, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-364 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Special Use Permit The owners of Lots 1, 2 and the West 1/2 of 3, Block 9, Mound Bay Park (corner of Commerce and Bartlett Boulevards) have applied for a Special Use Permit for transmission repair. The Planning Commission recommended the permit with following stipulations: 1. No more than one car stored outside Lights and sig~ be limited. kg C ¢'i'Z.,. sseJppv )ueo!ldd¥ Jo aJnleu6!s 3NOHd313/ ~?~,~--\ 'V4 \-"J 9NINOZ NOIIdlWDS::ta 9V93] Al~BdOJ:::lcl '3HI :::10 NOIIVDO] CINrlOIA! zlO 39VqqlA ±l~cl ~S¢1 ]VI3:::::ld$ blO_-I NOI_[V31qddV 10-9-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 4, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-371 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Revenue Sharing Budget A budget of $43,000 has to be established for the Revenue Sharing. Below are listed some suggestions for the Revenue Sharing use: Spring & fall Pickup $9,000. Summer Recreation Program 5,500. New Police Facility (Remodeling Site) 21,500.----'--~ Park Development' 7,000. $43,000. Spring & Fall Pickup - The Revenue Sharing Fund has customarily handled this project. Summer Recreation Program'- This expenditure would allow more expenditures within the Park fund. Police Facilities - If the Police Department is moved to larger facilities, funds will be needed for remodeling or rent or both. Of the three sites under consideration, all will require expenditures before they can be used. Since nothing was included in the Police Budget, this item should cover a big share of the expense. Park Development - Since HUD Funds are no longer available for Park develop- ment, the amount suggested could be used to complete work (if necessary) in Doone Park, Island Park and Three Points Parks. If not required in the above mentioned parks, other parks are in need of work. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 3, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-365 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Delinquent Utility Bills At the September llth meeting, the Council set October 9th as the date for the Public Hearing on the attached list of utility bills which are over 6 months past due. Payment of some of the accounts has been made and if more are paid before next Tuesday's meeting, a revised list will be available. ,)?7? DELINQU~IT UTILITY BILLS (Over Six Months Old) Account No. 110167J611 11031167351 110461.74341 no525oo1~ 11055503781 11067180161 11085509871 11109592591 11166225701 ~~?~ 33406261611 3-3~42~42431 33463470511 33530312181 3351~831o791 33587302691 Name Allen __Oeo_H~ugb . K.~ K~t~nm Douglas Jensen Jo~ ~derson Jerry Pehrson 'Bob Matson ~s ~b~derson ~ree Pts Inn Steve Sch~dt Steven ~rsnbson Oar~les~i S. ~ Ki~sch 0 ~ggs & Ash Amount 34.o8 47.Lo 107.27 34.o8 61.27 62.12 4~.81 33.7)4 . ak .... ~ Ja~es Just~a~ f~ ~:,,oo 0 ~ ,~ 83.88 3.35933ff33.tl ....... ~ Sand ~-~dr~ ~ 33620301851 ' Ferner Johnson 3/i$J~Zll__ ~J~ ~Kall~ 33620h82861 33620486581 Douglas ~ elson '.~"'g ,.~.~ () ct c~ Steve Pulbrabeh To tal 36.31 10-9-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 2, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-366 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Recommendations Attached is a copy of the Planning Commission minutes. The following items require Council action: Item 1. Non-conforming Use - Possible Appeal W.% of Lot 27, Subd. of Lots 1 & 32 Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood Zoned Commercial. The Planning Commission recommended denial of a street front, side yard and lake front variances. Subdivision of Land Lots 18, 19 & 20, Block 2, Pembroke Zoned A-2 6,000 Square Feet The Planning Commission recommends the following division: Parcel A - Lot 18 and W. % of Lot 19 6,000 Sq. Ft. Parcel B - Lot 20 and E. ~ of Lot 19 6,000 Sq. Ft. The Administration concurs. Front Yard Variance - Possible Appeal Lots 10 & 11, Block 3, Woodland Point Zoned A-2 6,000 Square Feet The Planning Commission recommended denial of a 4.5 foot street front variance, but do recognize the existing non-conforming 2 foot side yard and 4.5 foot street front variance of house and require compliance with the 20 foot setback for garage. Reason: Concurring with this type of variance would contribute to potential traffic hazard. Special Use Permit - Auto Repair Shop Lots 20-23, Incl., Block 2, Shirley Hills Unit F Zoned Commercial The Planning Commission recommended approval of the special use structure and area as shown on plan and that, if a third parking bay similar to two shown could be provided for future parking, that the Planning Commission recommend that contract parking not be necessary; special use permit to be granted with the following stipulations: A. Auto repair would not include body work, painting or similar type activities related to body work. B. Lighting in security parking should be shielded so as to not impair or encroach on single family dwelling abutting property. 10-~-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 9, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. .79-378 SUBJECT: Addendum to Planning Commission Recommendations Council Memorandum 79-366 On Monday, the CoUncil considered a variance for a non-conforming use which is listed as Item 6 on Council Memorandum 79-366. Item 6. Non-Conforming Use Lots 1, 2 and Part of 3, Block 1, Dreamwood Zoned A-2 6,000 Square Feet The Planning Commission recommended approval of 2.15 foot rear yard variance and to recognize the existing non-conforming use with the stipulation the storage building not be converted to a dwelling at any time. The Administration concurs. x----~L~onard L. Kopp Council Memorandum No. 79-366 Planning Commission Recommendations - Page 2 'C. Either earthen berm and/or shrubbery or a privacy fence be erected on the south border of property to a height specified so as to shield the abutting single family residence of any noise or lighting. Berm would also direct flow of drainage toward right-of-way. Berm/shrub- bery/fence to run 225 feet from SW corner easterly at rear lot line.' Do At time improvement of parking area "C" becomes necessary to provide parking for this structure, a privacy fence shall be erected from SE corner of property northerly to street front setback of 31 feet. (Parking areas to be designated A, B and the bay for future expan- sion - C) E. Storage area of auto repair to be screened by shrubbery barrier ~nd be included on front northeast portion of lot - minimum height of J shrubbery to be 5 feet. ublic hearing is necessary. November 13th is recommended. 5. Non-conforming use Lots 14 & 15, Block 5, Woodland Point Zoned A-2 6,000 Square Feet The Planning Commission recommended that we recognize the variances required on the existing building and deny the side yard variance for an addition. The Administration concurs. Non-conforming Use Lots 1, 2 and Part of 3, Block 1, Dreamwood Zoned A-2 6,000 Square Feet Planning Commission will act on this application at the October 8th meeting. ~t--~e~nard ~-. Kopp MINUTES OF THE MOUND'ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 24, 1979 Present were: Chairman Russell Peterson, Commissioners Gary Paulsen, Margaret Hanson, Harriett Dewey and Bud Stannard; Council Representative Gordon Swenson; City Manager Leonard L. Kopp; City Inspector Henry Truelsen and Secretary Marge Stutsman. MINUTES The minutes of the September 10th Planning Commission meeting were presented for consideration. Revisions: In 5th paragraph, line 1, after the word "li~e", add "across rear of" and in line 2, add the word "setback" after "same". Dewey moved and Hanson seconded a motion to approve the minutes as clarified. The vote was unanimously in favor. BOARD OF APPEALS 1. Non-conforming Use ~ W- ~ of Lot 27~ Subd. of Lots 1 & 32, Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood Kerry Peterson was present. ~ ~ · . Paulsen moved and Hanson seconded a motion that variances not be approved. / The vote was. unanimously in favor of the denial. I '~ Commissioner Gerald Smith arrived. ' 2. Subdivision of Land Lots 18, 19 and 20, Block 2, Pembroke Eugene Schlee was present. Dewey moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to recommend granting the sub- division as requested. The vote was unanimously in favor. 3. Front Yard Variance/Non-conforming Use Lots 10 and 11~ Block 3, Woodland Point Donald Pederson was present. Sta. nnard moved and Hanson seconded a motion that we deny 4.5 foot street front variance for garage, but that we do recognize the existing non con-. forming 2 foot side yard variance and 4.5 foot street front variance of house and require compliance with the 20 foot setback for garage. Reason: Concurring with this type of variance would contribute to potential traffic hazard. The vote was unanimously in favor. 4o Special Use Permit - Auto Repair Lots 20-23,. Incl., Block 2, Shirley Hills Unit F Steve Chase was present. ~d and Hanson seconded a motion that we' approve the special use structure and area as shown and that, if a third parking bay (no less than 60 feet by 90 feet) similar to two shown could be provided for future park- ing, that we recommend to Council that contract parking not be necessary (parking bays to be designated "A" - westerly bay, "B" - easterly bay and future expansion bay - "C"); the special use permit to be granted with the following stipulations: Planning Commission Minutes September 24, 1979 - Page 2 4. Special Use Permit - Auto Repair (Continued) A. Auto repair would not include body work, painting or similar type activities related to body work. B. Lighting in security parking should be shielded so as to not impair or encroach on single family dwelling abutting property. C. Either earthen berm and/or shrubbery or a privacy fence be erected on the south border of property to a height specified so as to shield the abutting single family residence of any noise Or lighting. Berm · '' would also direct flow of drainage towardright-of-way. Berm with shrubbery/fence to run 225 feet from SW corner easterly at rear D. At time improvement of parking area "C" becomes necessary to provide parking for this structure, a privacy fence shall be erected from SE corner of property northerly to street front setback of 31 feet. E. 'Storage area of auto repair to be screened by shrubbery barrier and be included on front northeast portion of lot - minimum height of shrubbery to be 5 feet. The vote was unanimously in favor. Non-conforming Use Lots 14 and 15, Block 5, Woodland Point· Gene Bristol was present. Dewey moved and Paulsen seconded a motion recognizing that, if this were zoned A-l, a side yard variance would not be needed, but to move that we recognize the variances required on the existing building and to deny side yard variance for an addition. Reason: Felt applicant could stay within the setback for the few inches. The vote was: Hanson and Stannard - nay; all others voted aye. Motion carried for the denial. Reason for nay votes: It is unreasonable to expect applicant to drop 6 inches and make an 11'6" addition---anything under 12 feet in width not worth building. Discussed date of next meeting as October 8th is a holiday for City office. Smith moved and Dewey seconded a motion to adjourn. Ail in favor, so adjourned. Attest: AGENDA FOR MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 24, 1979 BOARD OF APPEALS 1. Kerry E. Peterson, 4798 Northern Road W. ½ of Lot 27, Subd. of Lots 1 & 32, Skarp and Lindquist's Ravenswood - Map 5 Non-Conforming Use Eugene G. Schlee (Proposed addresses -. 4432 and 4440 Lamberton Road) Lots 18, 19 and 20, Block 2, Pembroke - Map 13 Subdivision of Land 3e Donald L. Pedersen, 1586 Dove Lane Lots 10 and 11, Block 3, Woodland Point - Map 2 Front Yard Variance 4. Steven Chase (Proposed address - 52 Eden Road) Lots 20-23, Incl., BlOck 2,. Shirley Hills Unit F - Map 5 Special Use Permit - Auto Repair Gene E. Bristol, 1586 Bluebird Lane Lots 14 & 15, Block 5, Woodland Point - Map 2 Non-conforming Use Mound Advisory Planning Commission Meeting FROM: TO: SUBJECT: 1) 2) 3) 5) City Inspector Planning Commission Members Board of Appeals - September 24, 1979 Kerry E. Peterson,-4798 Northern Road Expansion of non-conforming use: Extensive variances are requested to expand structure on these premises. I do not feel that this should be allowed in these particular circumstances as that general area has very little continunity to the existing zoning ordinances, nor in any probability will it have any continunity to the proposed setback requirements. Eugene G Schlee (proposed addresses 4432 & 4440 Lambert0n Road) Subdivision of land Within the requirements of the subdivision ordinance Donald L. Pedersen - 1586 Dove Lane Non-conforming use of existing house. Street front deficiency of 4.5 ft, sideyard deficiency of 2.0 ft. Applicant is requesting to install a garage at the same street front setback as the house. I feel that the preference would be to install garage at proper street front setback of 20 feet. Gene E Bristol- 1586 Bluebird Lan~ Non-conforming Use Street front deficiency of 6.8 ft., side yard deficiency of 3.4 ft and side yard deficiency of .57 feet on proposed addition. Zoned A-2 residential requiring 10 ft. sldeyard. The existing structure and proposed addition does meet and exceeds the minimum side yard require- ment of platted lots of record 60 feet or less, within the same zoning of A-2. 4) Steven Chase (proposed address 52-- Eden Road) Special Use Permit - Auto Repair At this time we do not have a site plan to determine compliance to zoning requirements. ~t~' APPIJICA TION FC~ARIANCE CITY OF MOUND NAME OF APPLICANT INTEREST IN PROPERTY PROPERTY PLAT ~OT l~ ~ X B~OGK Telephone._ ~o~K FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Addre s s VARIA_~CE REQUESTED: ~ t ~ ~. ' "".-, FRONT [/ ~ [ ACCESSORY YARD ~.. ~/. FTc] BUILDING LOT SIZE NOTE: SIDE ~., , ~ I yA R D ~/~ ~3 FT:J LOT SQ. ,...., ~' ,,. 8-- 'Telephone Number 1. Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. 2. Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property. Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and'streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing. 3_. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward N. C. U** or 'V /[ 'q request. OTHER (describe) /X FI ---~-- , A build*ng permit must be applied for within one year council resolution or variance granted becomes null and Variances are no~ansfer~e~.. Signatur .. PLANING COM~SSION RECOMMENDATION DATE COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO.. DATE -".-'non- conforming use 77/ APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND Sec. 22.03-a ' VILLAGE OF MOUND FEE OWNER Eugene G. Schlee 3140 Harbor Lane %101 Minneapolis, MN 55441 PLAT 37910 19 117 PARCEL 1035 23 34 0042 Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: Lots 18, 19 and 20, Block 2, Pembroke Tobedividedasfollows: Lot 18 and the West ~ of Lot 19, Block 2, Pembroke Lot 20 and the East ~ of Lot 19, Block 2, Pembroke (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot No. From Square feet TO Square feet Reason: (sigr)ature) 12 Applicant's interest in the property: This pplication must be signed by all ihe OWNERS of the property, ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DATE '"' , ~ II Ii II II I III ~ii '- II I APP ILICATION FOVARIANCE CITY OF MOUND NAME OF APP LICANT~01d Address I~b ~-~ .... /x,g/q(z'- INTEREST IN PROPERTY FEE $ ZONING PROPERTY ADDRESS ,/'~'?'~,~?'~" ... P LA T/.~,~d>rP P A R C E L//~gD FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Telephone Number .</r']p~.~ _/(3 ~ ~ _ VA RIANC~~_ Q~E~? TED :~ 7fft2x~.~ 7- I ~ FRONTq/x/~' / [ ACCESSORY YARD [ Z~ FT.] BUILDING I. SIDE FT.[ YARD /~ REAR YARD [ FT-I N. C. U.* or OTHER (describe) REASON FOR REQUEST: LOT SIZE ! LOT sQ. FOOTAGE _/? ;/~ NOTE: FT.] 1. Attach a survey AND scale drawing ~howing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. Z. Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property. Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing. 3. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward request. building permit must be applied for within one yea; council resolution or variance granted becomes null and Variances are i ~ _ _~ not txansferabl~. A~PL~CANT~, ~~ ~ ~~. DAZE Signature PLANNING COMMISSION RE COMMENDATION DATE COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO DATE *non-conforming use ~ aff~[--o 7 FbR: ; C~ERTIFICATE OF. SURLY P~-~ ~'~ ~Y S ~--/,/ / / .0 0 \? O' / ~/L "~o I o Denotes iron monument c~ Denotes offset stake x ooo.o Denotes existing elev.. { ooo.o } Denotes Proposed elev. .,. Denotes surface drainage Proposed garage floor elev. I 0 .t~0~j · · P uposed lowest floor elev. = Proposed top of foundation elev. = BENCH MARK: DEMARS - GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No. Plymouth MN 55441 Phone: (6t2) 559-0908 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and)~ll visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. // /Minn· Reg. No. ~ fo~::, File No. 2/~ Book - Page ' Scale ~.~' I.L APF I'L~3ATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT VILLAGE OF MOUND FEE $ LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY 14,'11 PLAT TELEPHONE PARCEL (-/72 . ,- .? SPECIAL USE PERMIT (uso) Applicant's Interest in Property ~-~-C.v't, , ,. ,. LA..j,, r lc' .- .~.-~'V~ ir - 0 ~-I~E(~i' State why this use, if §ranted, would not be contrary to the §eneral purpose and intent of the ordinance to secure public health, safely. §eneral welfare, and sub- stantial justice. Residents and owners of property within , / feet: '2_ 3 !'~ L PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DATE. COUNCIL ACTION Resolution no. DATE td APP ~ICATION FC~ARIANCE CITY OF MOUND NAME OF APPLICANT FEE ZONING_ PROPERTY Address /3: LOT .. ///' -- B LOCK .... ~ NumbTeleph°nee r __~-? ;- -~ / 3fDDI TI ON, :~/~2~'/~_/~-2~/- ' ~---~ , INTEREST IN PROPERTY __ . ~ FEE OWNER (if other than'applicant) Address Telephone Numb e r _.V-~~E REQUESTED: FRONrf ] ACCESSORY YARD ~,'~ FT.... BUILDING NOTE: YARD T FOOTAGE 1. Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. 2. Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property. Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing. 3_. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward N. C. U. * or request. OTHER (describe) REASON FOR REQUEST: .~-~, .~ ~ .building permit must be applied for within one year from the date of the A ~%\1 council resolution or~riance granted becomes null and void. ~ Variances are not tr/&~f~ferable.c, /7 ~" .~ dj APPLICANT L z(~"///'/f'/g Z, /~~ DATE q-/~" ~?' ( ~7/ Signature PLANING COM~SSION RECOMMENDATION DATE COUNCIL AC TION: RESOLUTION NO.. DATE *non-conforming use ~ ff/[~ ~ O -' Denot:e~r' O Denotes Iron Monument Set [~ Denotes Wood Stake XO00.O Denotes Existing Elevation- (000.0) Denotes Proposed Elevation < -- Denotes Direction of Surfac~ Drainage Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation--' Proposed Garage Floor Elevation = Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation = ! hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: 'Lots 14 and 15, Block 5, "Woodland Point", Hennepin county, ~.1innesota, according, to the recording plat thereof. McCOMBS-KN. UTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from o~ on .said land. It also shows the Iocaton of the stakes a~'?et for a pr,gposed building'. As surve/(ted byrnethis. 4th day of September197q -. =~/~[.r~/_.~ ,~/, Thomas S. Bergquist i// Land Surveyor, Minn. Reg. No.~ 7725 'CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for C£1V E B I 3 TO L APPLICATION RIANCE CITY OF MOUND NAME APPLICANT INTEREST IN PROPERTY VARIANCE REQUESTED: REAR YARD FEE $ PROPERTY/~ , ADDRESS · ~/~ ~L{// /~/~. PLAT ~" I"~"Y~, PARCEL( T~le phone ~ ' '-~ ~ 0~ (ff ot~e~ ~ ~1~c~) ~ele~ho~e Address , Number NOT~: 1. Attacha survey~D showing locahon of nr~p0sed YARD FT. -BUILDING ~ FT. ~ on property and abuttin'g stree~~ 2. Give owners~p ~nd~i~h~'~'~f YARD FT. LOT SIZE FT. locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application I ~,/~ FT. FOOI~G~ ~~ by extending survey or drawing, - ~. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward N. C. U. * or , . request. / . _ / / , - ,- / coancil'resolution or ~riance greed becomes null and void. Variances are n?t ~sfera~l~, PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION . . DATE COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO.. DATE *non-conforming use .~ ~c- 7 Certlfic~t~ of Sur~ey for Roger D. Rager in !~ts 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Drea~,,wwood Hennepin County~ Minnesota / I hereby certify that this is a tru~ and corr~ect repressntatton of a sur-~ey of the boundaries of [mts I and 2, and that Bart of Lot 3 lying Northeasterly of tho Southwesterly ~ feet thereof, Block l, Dreamwood, and the location of all existing buildings thereon. It does not p,mr- port to sho~.~ other Lmp~'ove:nents or encroachm,.~nts. Sea!o: 1" = 30' L~te : 9-6-79 o : Iron r~rker Cordon ,~{. Coffin P~,q. No. 606& Alvin ~t. k,3hder Reg. No.13295 [~nd Su~weyors and Pl~nn~rs ~ng b~,ko~ ~nnosota 10-9-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 4, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-372 SUBJECT: Street Construction - Lakewood The Engineer, as requested, has staked the curve on Lakewood Lane. Paint has been used to show the curb line if the curb was extended straight to straighten the south side. McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ae LAIRD SURVEYORS I SITE PLANNERS Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 October 9, 1979 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council 'City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: 1979 Mound Streets Lakewood Lane Gentlemen: After staking the different alternates for the intersection of Lakewood and Wilshire, various vehicles were driven through the inter- section. It is our opinion that an acceptable compromise was arrived at with representatives of the neighbors. This design seledted would be to remove approximately 8 feet of curb back to the joint at the last driveway. The new curb would then be extended straight and a 20 foot radius installed. The extra cost for removing the curb would be very minimal. The street opening at the intersection would be about 29 feet. The school bus and snow plow were able to negotate this inter- section safely. Therefore it is recommended that the above described intersection be constructed. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. William H. McCombs, P.E. ~:SC ~4213 Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls 10-9-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 5, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM 79-374 SUBJECT: Monmouth Road - 1979 Street Construction Mrs. Ann Larson, 4906 Leslie Road, has asked to be on the October 9th agenda to discuss a retaining wall and shrubbery on the Monmouth side of her and her Son's properties. This is part of the 1979 Street Construction. -L~onard L. Kopp cc: Engineer 10-9,79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 5, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-375 SUBJECT: Park Commission Minutes Attached is a copy of the Park Commission Minutes. The Park Commission recommended that Lake Langdon be designated as a non-motorized lake. Prior to taking any action on the Park Commission suggestion, it is recommended that a Public Hearing for all lakeshore owners on the Lake be held. It is further recommended that the use of small motors on small boats be allowed, say 4% or 5 horsepower on boats not to exceed so many feet in length. Leonard L. Kopp O~:~I'CE 0~' LOCAL AND MINNESOTA STATE PLANNING AGENCY · CAPITOL SQUARE BUILDING October 4, 1979 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA <~01 · PHONE.(612) 296-30~1 Leonard Kopp City Manager 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 ATTENTION: Charles E. Riesenberg RE: FY 1980 Langdon Lake Access City of Mound, Hennepin County Dear Mr. Kopp: This letter is to provide you with information about the review and ranking of your preliminary application for a park and recreation grant. I am pleased to inform you that your application ranked high enough to be considered further. This year the matter is complicated because Congress has not yet passed the funding bill for the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LAWCON). In addition, the House has proposed a substantial reduction from last year. It is most likely that the final funding level will be somewhere between that proposed by the House and the amount received in Fiscal Year 1979. In order to allow for the widest range of possibilities, the applications have been placed in three groups based on their ranking as follows: 1. Those which will be recommended to receive a 50% LAWCON grant and a 25% state LCMR grant. Those which will be recommended to receive at least a 50% state LCMR grant. However, if the LAWCON funding level is higher than expected, some from the top of this group will be recommended for a 50% LAWCON grant and a 25% state LCMR grant. 3. Those which could be recommended for a 50% LCMR grant if the LAWCON funding level is higher than expected. Your application has been placed in group 1. This does not mean that your application is approved. Therefore, do not begin any spending on this project. Any work done, money spent, or obligations incurred for acquisition.or development purposes before approval of the final application cannot be paid with grant funds or used as the local share. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ~ ® -2- The next step is for you to prepare a final'application. The final application will be submitted by us to the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service (HCRS) for federal consideration and to the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources and Legislative Advisory Committee for state consideration. These bodies will make final funding recommen- dations regarding approval, or disapproval, on your application. In order to assist you in preparation of your final application, a meeting is scheduled for Monday, October 22, 1979, from 9:00 a.m. to 1:O0 p.m. at the Capitol Square Building, Conference Room A, 550 Cedar Street, St. Paul, Minnesota. Attendance at this meeting is very important and all applicants are strongly urged to attend. At this meeting we will discuss the items to be included in your final application and the amount of the application. By then we should know how much Congress has appropriated for the LAWCON program. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to call the Parks and Recreation Grants Section of this office at 612/296-4703. Sincerely, Leland Newman Director /cle Minutes of Meeting Mpund Advisory Park Commission September 13, 1979 Present: Lars.on, Bailey, Case, Lynott, Anderson, Peterson, Shay, Hasek, Staff, Kopp, Rother, Withhart and Sec. D. De Laney. Meeting called tO 6rder by Chairman Larson. -Motion by Larson seconded by Lynott to approve the minutes of August 23, 1979. mlnutes as submitted. Shay brought out that on page 1, relating to Woodcrest 0utlots, that developer donated land in both outlots plus green space fee, will-be $'o noted in minutes. Motion made ~y.Larson 2nd by Shay that minutes of meeting of 8-23-79 be approved.as corrected. Unanimously approved. City Manager"'s Report: Kopp informed Commission that plans offered for the development of Lake Langdon and Indian Mound Park has been denied by Lawcon, other priorities forced the shelving of this project. Still hope, as Department of Natural Resources might possibly assist in financing of a public access to Lake Langdon out of Metro funds that would aid in the developing of the public access, parking lot area. Kopp took opinions from two residents in the Langdon Lake area and found they would not object to outboard motors if they did not exceed 4-1/2 horsepower, as some.of the younger children like to use small motors on the lake. Larson brought out that the Master Plan called for an access to the lake, blacktopped 'road. by the sewer plant and a park area with baseball diamond. n by Larson, 2nd by Case, "Commission recommend to City Council ~ action be taken to ban the use of ANY motorized watercraft on LakeLangdon.'¥ l~mou s I y app roved. Bailey asked KoPp if drainage, was working on Three Points, he stated yes, but that it could possibly be plugged with mud due to the heavy rains we have had. Kopp stated that Thomas & Sons, the contractors for the 1978 street projects'and con~ structlon, are off the job as of Tuesday night, September 11, 1979 consequently Three Points Park has not been even rough graded by them Phone is still in the Community Center building. Continental Phone Company cannot donate the phone or the charges and placing it on the outside would invite vandalism and it would be destroyed as often as it was repaired or replaced. Past experience of having a phone outside, downtown on Shoreline, in front of the police department, at the old City Nall location, it was ripped out or mutilated continuously. Council Rep. Report: Withhart stated that Council was of the same opinion as the Park Comm. inasmuch as they urged the police to enforce or dinances more strongly with regard to Mound Bay Park and there are many more ordinances on the books that will make this possible. Will take no other action to regulate the use of this park. Stated there will be an extension of the parking lot area along Commerce Blvd. that will be assessed to Surfside, Inc. and this shoul8 alleviate some of the parking congestion that is there now. M~nute~f ~ou~d Adv y Park Comm. Meeting 9-13-79 inued I~.ag e two County Road 125 from Skelly Station to BlacklLake bridge was supposed to have a bike hike path and this will not be done, there are no shoulders on the road. County wants to blaektop the road before giving it to the City to maintain and this shoOld put us in a good position to dicker for path, before the City takes over this county road after the blacktopping and new bridge is done. The Minnesota Park & Recreation Assn. will be holding there next meeting in Duluth, should any Comm. members with to attend, there is the possibility the City could pay the registration fee, let Kopp know. Councll took Park Comm. recommendation and there will be a sign placed on the newly painted Community Center with new identlfication, 1st line will read "MOUND DEPOT" 2nd line will state "COMMUNITY CENTER". Discussion by.COmm, members of the Island Park Playground sign and "under construction" sign underneath that, and then the anonymously placed 3rd sign underneath that, stating "SI. NCE 1976"- Commission appreciated the humor of this and did state that the date was in error, it has been m6ch longer than that. Park Directors Report - none Recreational C~mmittee report - none, Bailey has been on vacation Trails Committee report - none Planning Comm. report - none Long Range Planning Committee report: - Larson stated that as a result of Parks are PeoPle meetings, they have a library of slides of the parks, that will be periodically updated. Do not plan on holding this series of meeting the next year (1980). Bailey added she was amazed there were no dock permit complaints. Hasek stated that boats are docking on Pembroke and Wychwood beaches and ignoring the swimming area bouys. Motion by Hasek seconded by Bailey that meeting b~ adjourned until the ~ext scheduled meeting of September 27, 1979 for Recreation and'Long Range Planning Committees, unanimously approved. D,De Laney ~-9-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 4, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-370 SUBJECT: 1980 Budget The Council has received a proposed 1980 Budget and a breakdown showing the projected mill levy. All the levies suggested are legal as I under- stand the levy limit law, so no penalty should be imposed for an overlevy. In checking the special assessments against City property, the levy can be reduced by paying off the assessments where funds are available and return- ing some land to the State for sale. The following assessment properties are suggested to be paid off: PID # 13-117-24 33 0045 19-117-23 31 0009 19-117-23 31 0010 19-117-23 31 0011 19-117-23 32 0172 19-117-23 32 0173 19-117-23 32 0174 23-117-24 34 0051 19-117-23 33 0049 Plat Parcel Project Fund to Pay Amount 61650 4610 CBD Parking MSA $1,636.53 37850 0690 1978 Street MSA 3,516.20 37850 0730 1978 Street MSA 1,193.61 37850 0760 1978 Street MSA 1,639.25 38010 0015 Sewer & Water MSA 748.22 38010 0035 Sewer & Water MSA 748.22 38010 0055 Sewer & Water MSA 748.22 Sub-total MSA $8,730.25 61610 6790 Storm Sewer 6702 Park $48.24 37910 3740 Sewer & Water Park 80.59 Sub-total Park $128.83 24-117-24 44 0024 37730 0710 12-117-24 43 0020 62200 2230 Sewer Lateral Water $936.32 1978 Streets Sewer 287.96 $1,224.28 By paying off the above, the 1980 tax levy is reduced to $10,765.86. This levy can be reduced by an additional $506.65 by returning to the State, Lots 5, 6 and 7, Block 9, Woodland Point. A new schedule of the estimated mill rate is attached. LeOnard L. 'Kopp / REVISED 1 Mill = 38400 1979 Fund Tax Levy Mills General 374,016 9.740 Park 33,710. .937 Fire Relief 23,250. .646 P.E.R.A. 46,848. 1.302 477,824. 12.625 Over Levy P.E.R.A. Deficit Fire Relief Bonds 1976 Imp. 1978 Imp. 1979 Imp. Total City Special Assessments to 1978 1978 Assessment made in 1979 Diseased Trees Liability Ins. Abated Taxes Street Mainten- ance Increase 616.47 .017 3,134.00 4,810.00 7,944.00 .221 4,182.01 .117 36,776.00 1.022 14.002 .1980 Tax Levy ~ 423,916. 11.~39 40,225. 1.0 12,307'. 111~ 57,641. 1.5~1 ~ 534,089. ; 13.9~7 562. .0/4 12,499. .345 2,013.11 ,' 9,621.00 / 13,632.00 ~ 3,201.50 ..... ~-564,36 / 40,220.00 "~, 1~04~ / r/' 3 ~ 556. O0 ~ . 17. 1980 BUDGET GENERAL GOVERNMENT: City Council City Manager Finance Inspector Legal Assessing Election Prosecutor Planning Human Rights Contingency PUBLIC SAFETY: Police Fire Fire Capital Outlay Civil Defense Emergency PUBLIC WORKS: Street Parks Water Sewer Shop & Store Diseased Trees Cemetery Sewer Capital Outlay Improvement Equipment Outlay LIQUOR PENSIONS P.E.R.A. Fire Relief REVENUE SHARING BUILDING FUND DEBT SERVICE: Water Revenue Bond Special Assessments-City Property City Share-Improvement Bonds 1976 $2,013.11% 1978 9,621.00 1979 13,632.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS Plus Interest on 1979 Bonds $19,065. 90,208 ~ 106,7967 31,944~. 14,500~ 34,050~ 6,4904 11,275/ 13,655~ 450~ 20,000/ $522,699. 115,920 ~ 95,130~ 9,045/ $257,585% 250,677/ 390,525~'~ 37,295.1 49,015. 4,350.. 48,228. 169,670. $180,938. $105,865.~ 46,306 $ 37,136.~C 12,456.36 25,266.11 $348,433. 742,794. 1,282,070. 180,938. 152,171. 43,000. 45,000.' 74~8~8,47 736,043. 10-9-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 4, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-369 SUBJECT: 1980 Salaries The budget presented the City Council contained increased salaries for the non-union personnel. Based on previous Council discussion, the attached resolution estab- lishes salaries for the non-union personnel. RESOLUTION 79- RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING WAGES, ~ALARIES AND WORKING CONDITIONS FOR 1980 .WITH TilE EXCEPTION OF THE ATTORNEY'S SALARY BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA That the following wages, salaries and working conditions are adopted .for the year 1980. Position Clerk-Typist 0-6 months 7-12 months 13-18 months after 19 months Receptionist Special Assessment Clerk Accounting Clerk 0-6 months 7-18 months after 18 months 0-6 months .7-!5 months after 18 months Utility Billing Clerk Manager's Secretary Police Secretary 0-6 months 7-18 months' after 19 months Animal Warden 0-6 months 7-12 months 13-24 months 25-36 months Amo%t -~O per month 712.00 per month 774.00 per month 913.00 per month 913.00 per month 853.00 per month 913.00 per month 974.00 per month 853.00.per month 913.00 per' month 974.00 per month 1120.00 per month 1120.00 per month 853.00 per month 913.00 per month 974.O0 per month 913.O0 per month 974.00 per month .1035.00 per month 1157.00 per month Building Inspector Liquor Store Manager Clerk/Treasurer Public Works Director Police Chief City Manager Liquor Store - Senior Clerk Liquor Clerk Part Time Clerk per year per year per year per year per year per year 6.46 per hour 4.50 to 6.03 per hour 3.00 to 4.50 per hour All fringe benefits for the above positions including Vacations, sick leave, severance pay, insurance, etc. are to be the same as adopted in the Admin- istrative Code.' 10-9-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 5, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-373 SUBJECT: Accounting Clerk Salary The Accounting Clerk salary for 1978 was established at $817.00. During the year, a change of personnel took place. Attached is a memorandum from the Clerk-Treasurer suggesting a change in the 1978 pay schedule. This is correspondingly reflected in the proposed 1979 schedule. It is recommended that the Clerk-Treasurer's recommendation be adopted. L. Kopp ' ~ ---- CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472~1'155 October 5, 1979 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK/TREASURER SUBJECT: ACCOUNTING CLERK SALARY Resolution 78-518 establishing wages and salaries does not indicate the three step increase for the accounting clerk position. Since there has been a change in personnel in 1979 unless the resolution is amended the new employee would be paid $817.OO per month with no provision for increases. The .present employee was hired with a starting salary of $774.00 and having completed six months should be increased to $817.OO. It is recommended the resolution be amended to read: Accounting Clerk 0J6 months 7-18 months after 19 months 774.00 per month 817.00 per month 867.00 per month 10-9-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 5, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-376 SUBJECT~ REQUEST FOR WINE LICENSE Bo Shun Moy of the House of Moy has made application for a Wine License. This requires a public hearing. A recommended date for a public nearing would be November 6, 1979. '~8onard L. Kopp ~ CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. IMINNES.OTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 9, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp Public Works Director Information Memos ISLAND PARK PLAYGROUND 'We have it final graded and Illies& Sons started bringing in black dirt. We had to stop them as the dirt they were bringing was unsuitable. At this time we have two prices for pulverized dirt. Dale Green - $~.50 per yard picked up and Illies $6.00 per yard picked up. Chris Bollis left a note St Ellis Company on Cry. 11 and Highway 7 for them to c~ll us with their price. The park is drying very well and if we don't 9et rain tonight we will start haflling on Thursday from the lowest bidder, if we are done with the curbin9 on Glen Elyn. Chris is checkin9 on a seeder which we can use as soon as the black dirt is leveled. THREE PO]lqIS PARK I have contac%ed Widmer Bros. and Lyle Swanson and we found it necessary to add a piece of storm sewer for the park to drain properly. I have made arrangements to meet a survey crew there on Thursday to set up where it has to g0 and the grade. Hopefully we can get Fritz in 'next week to install it. Then we can get it graded and seeded by the time it freezes too hard. DRAINAGE DITCH AT TONKA The Public Works Dept. came up with a new idea for this which we will discuss with Lyle Swanson firs[ before makin9 a report on it. ResAu~ctfully, ./ t Robert Shanley Public Works Director 10-9. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 9, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-377 SUBJECT: Acting City Manager The City Manager plans to attend the City Manager's Conference in Phoenix from October 20th to October 25, after which he plans to vacation until November 4th. Inasmuch as no meeting is scheduled for October 16th, it is re- quested an Acting City Manager be appointed for the period from October 20th through November 4tho 10-9-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 4, 1979 INFORMATIO~ MEMORANDUM NO. 79-108 SUBJECT: Police Goals and Objectives The Council asked for a report on goals and objectives. Attached is a copy of a rough draft report from the Police Chief. Further refining is needed as indicated in the report. LeOnard L. KoPp ~ .' cc: Police Chief CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 2, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp - City Manager Charles Johnson - Chief of Police Departmental Planning/Goals and Objectives Attached is a rough draft of a Misson Statement for the Mound Police Department. The final draft of this statement should be a joint effort of the council, city manager, and police chi'el. The draft is meant merely as a guide. The intent of a Mission Statement is twofold. One, to briefly describe what has and is bei.ng done within the department. Secondly, to give management input and direction to the police department for future planning. To implement the development of the Mission Statement, goals and objectives, it is recommended the following procedure be followed. 1. The Mound city council invite our contract communities to participate formally in the development process. 2. The Mound Police Commission, representatives of our contract cities, the city manager and police chief meet as a committee for the purpose of reviewing the proposed Mission Statement. Secondly, this committee, upon approving a Mission Statement, continue to meet for the purpose of jointly developing departmental goals. This joint planning is critical in that the decisions made will affect the delivery of police service and the quality of life in each community. 3. Upon receiving this direction from the respective city councils, the police administration'and the city manager can then develop the objectives necessary to attain the goals established for the department. 4. With the Mission Statement, goals and objectives complete, the police staff can then implement action plans to accomplish these goals with the complete assurance that the actions taken are in tune with the needs and demands of the community we serve. 5. Implementation of these plans can then take place by all departmental personnel. 6. Annually, or more often if necessary, the council should review with the police chief progress towards attaining goals, reviewing goals, and adding or deleting to the process as economic or social changes dictate. (Attached is a flow chart outlining these activities.) Leonard Kopp page 2 i0-2-79 Below is a list of possible goals that may be set up for the department. AI~ though the goals are just short broad statements, they have far reaching implications. It is for this reason that input from the community be provided through the elected city council. Goal #1 - to reduce the incidents of surpressable crimes per capita within the cities of Mound, Spring Park, Minnetrista, and St. Bonifacius Goal #2 -'to reduce criminal opportunity through police/community cooperation Goal #3 - to increase the proportion of offenses cleared Goal #4 - to reduce the amount of elapsed time between commission and clear- ance of an offense Goal #5 - to reduce the total amount of property loss through crime Goal #6 - to reduce the number of repeat and habitual youthful criminal acts Goal #7 ~ to improve the administrative efficiency of the department Goal #8 - to develop more efficient criminal investigation/reporting techniques Goal #9 - to minimize the use of expendable energy resources Goal #10 - to maximize career potential for police employees Goal #Il - to increase the level of confidence held by the community in the ability of the police Goal #12 - to decrease the projected rate of motor vehicle accidents for number of registered motor vehicles Obviously these are but a sampling of the §oals that may be established for the police department. It is the Mission Statement which will give the direction to the establishment of these goals. All goals, objectives and action plans should relate back to the Mission Statement. Respectfu 1 1 y, Char 1 esCd'ohnson Chief of Police CJ: I ao Step 1 MISSION Poi ice Chief & City Manager & Council Step 2 DEPARTMENTAL GOALS Police Administration City Manager & Council Step 3 OBJECTIVES Police Administration & City Man.ager Step 4 ACTION PLANS Police Staff Step 6 ASSESSMENT Police Administration & City Manager & Council Step 5 IMPLEMENTATION Police Administration ROUGH DtTAF1 STATEMENT OF MISSION OF THE MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT The Mound Police Department has the full responsibility for providing professional police services to the west lake communities of Mound, Spring Park, Minnetrista, and St. Boni- facius. The department provides a total, high quality, service to each of the communities. For all practical purposes the geographical boundaries of the'communities are non-existent as they pertain to the delivery of police service. Each of the communities is interlocked socially and economically and the law enforcement problems of any one community have both direct and indirect relationship and impactS on the others. Each of the communities has its particular identify, of course, and has some police problems individual to the community. Each of these individual community based problems shall be addressed fully, limited in scope only by the fiscal limitations of the department. Ultimately, peace and good order rests with the citizens of the community. The department is merely a professional extension of the citizens needs and demands for safety and order. Without the cooperation of the community as a whole, the department could not function. Maintaining a proper balance of this responsibility between the community and its police is essential for an orderly society. COMMUNITY RELATIONS If the control of peace and good order is to be a joint effort of the commun'ity and the department, then the cornerstone of the effort must be cordial, respectful, and trusting relationships between the police and the community. Every effort must be made, and no opportunity overlooked, to strengthen this police/community bond. The police must endeavor to insure that all citizens of each of the communities view the police department as an inte9eral part of the community and not an organization outside or estranged from it. -1- ROUGH ~RAFT Good police/community relations cannot be maintained by entrusting this crucial function to a few officers or the police administration. Thi's function must be a department wi~e concern. Good relations with the community is the sum total of good private relations between police officers in the performance of their duty and individual members of the community. A citizen's image of the department is largely influenced, if not wholly determined, by the officers he encounters, If'they are competent, polite, and caring, the relationships will be continually improved, For this reason, officers are encouraged to develop the relationships with all segments of the community. The department must provide ready access to citizens, for timely assis- tance and provide an ~ssurance of high level, friendly~ and competant service. The " department must provide for group ahd individual needs to the greatest extent possible by continuing to sponsor, support, a~d offer advice on programs designed to foster community relations, Primary ~nterests shall continue to be young adult programs and the police reserves. TRAFFIC SAFE~Y A major task devolved on the police since the advent of our mobile society, is the protection ~f motorists and pedestrians. Traffic accidents are responsible for the majority of property loss, personal i'njury~ and death to the community. In investigation of acci- dents and traffic law enforcement accounts for a large part of police resources. The police resources must continue to be occupied.by this task, Effort must be directed towards searching out methods' of stream-lining the effort to provide the most efficient and effective way of insuri~ng safe highways. Emphasis should be in the areas of strict over-all enforcement, selective enforcement where appropriate, and fostering an attitude of voluntary compliance to the traffic code. At the administration level, effort should continue to foster effective liason with other -2- ROUGH ~RAFT city, county, and state agencies. CRIME SUPPRESSION A primary deterrent to the commission of a crime lies in maintaining the belief in would- be'offenders that they will be detected and apprehended. Highly visable, well equipped, uniformed police is an effective and efficient method of maintaining an attitude in the would-be offender that detection is likely. The mere presence of uniformed officers generally has a calming effect and tends to inhibit anti-social behavior. To effectively suppress crime with the utilization of uniformed police demands high visa- bility, random-and ~selective patrol, and maximum utilization of available manpower. The department must strive for the most effective deployment of manpower based on careful analysis of community needs and crime trends. CRIME PREVENTION Over the past several years, many programs have developed under the broad title of 'Crime Prevention.' The definition of crime prevention is often misunderstood and causes confusion. Preventing crimes actually includes three distinct concepts: Removing the social causes of crime, threatening punishment for crimes, and reducing the opportunity to commit crimes. OA~ISE-R~IOVA£ ORI~E I~VEWT~ON: It is generally'felt that the most effective means of crime prevention is to remove or reduce the underlying social causes of crime. Efforts to improve employment opportunities, to provide better education for the disadvantaged, to upgrade housing and to build shelters for runaway, all' have been at least partially justified in removing or reducing some of the basic social problems which lead to crime. ROUGH DRAFT ~INATIVE CRI~E PREVENTION: The threat of certain punishment for criminal offenses have long been felt to have been a preventative effect. The assumption is that where the pain of the penalty out-weighs the advantage gained from the criminal act, the potential offender will refrain from commiting the offense. This concept is the basis of the criminal justice system. Penalties are imposed by the courts, not only as a punishment for a particUlar offender, but to warn would-be criminals that the same fate awaits them if they violate the criminal law. The success of a social control system designed around punative prevention, however, depends how certain is the threat of punishment. Within our community, approximately 1/3 of all criminal offenses result in an arrest, this being true, it is doubtful that many would-be offenders consider the threat of punishment to be substantial. PHYSICAL CRIME PREVENTION: While both cause-removal, and punative Crime Prevention seeks to reduce the motivation to commit Crimes, physical crime prevention strategies approach the problem by reducing the opportunity to commit an offense. Placing valuables in vaults, removing keys from automobile'ignitions, using dead-bolt locks on doors, are all physical'Crime Prevention meausres. The traditional Crime Prevention role of the police is in the area of punative prevention. The police department has a continuing obligation ~o increase the risk of eventual punish- ment for offenses by increasing the current rate of apprehension and case clearance and constant improving case preparation to insure convictions. However, concentration solely on p'unative prevention measures does not fulfill the department's responsibilities for prevention. The police department must undertake to aid the community to protect itself from crime by working with residents and businessmen to encourage them to adopt sound physical Crime -4- ROUGH DRAFT Prevention measures. The department must continue to expand current efforts to make citizens aware of thei~ responsibility to safe-guard themselves and their property thru low-cost, common sense opportunity reduction and risk management practices. TRAUMA INTERVENTION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT The mobility of the police department and'its constant presence in the community often makes it the only emergency service available to provide immediate emergency assistance' and aid. This includes immediate aid at a variety of physical traumas such as traffic accidents, personal injuries, acute illnesses. 'Additionally, the department is called upon to aid in interpersonal trauma such as domestic crisis, child neglect and abuse, suicide, and other anti-social behavior reflecting a wide variety of human problems. The community is continually relyin§ upon the police to include emergency assistance on interpersonal traumas. The role of the department in conflict management and crisis intervention is becoming increasingly important and is consuming a growing share of the time and resources of the department. The department cannot hope to eliminate these problems but should attempt to medicate some of their more harmful affects not only because they are inherently undesirable, but because they often lead to crime and they severely affect the quality of life of the community. More training is required to equip department personnel to discharge these duties. Training will provide for more effective identification of potential problems and will provide for better coordination between the police and other social service agencies and allow for the maximum utilization of these agencies in coping with the harmful affects of this trauma, ROUGH DRAF~ ~ Additionally, the department must foster good relations with the fire department, continually striving to provide mutual aid and assistance in all instances where the professional expertise of each department combines to better serve the community. INVESTIGATION-CRIMINAL APPREHENSION One of the basic tasks assigned the police department is the identification and apprehension of criminals and'the acquisition of evidence of the criminality to be used in court. This task is increasingly difficult as a result of numerous court decisions restricting or modifying traditional methods. Adequate and legally acceptable evidence and case prepa~ ration has become increasingly complex and technical and demands a large share of depart- mental resources. The average clearance rate for crimes knowns to police in the United States is approximately 20%. The Mound Police Department does better than this national average. In 1978, the department had a clearance of over 30%. ~ith our limited manpower, this is remarkable, yet the department must strive to improve this percentage. Having less than 1 out of 3 chance of being apprehended is insufficient incentive to deter would-be criminals. The direction the department must take to maintain and improve the effectiveness of criminal apprehension is multifasited. Of primary importance is building trusting relationship with the community and encourage citizens to report all criminal conduct. Recent studies byLEAA show that up to 50% of all crimes are unreported to the police. Effective investi- gation coupled with citizen participation will result in a free-flow of information and cause improved case clearance and complete case preparation. The department must strengthen its investigative capabilities by utilizing all available resources, both manpower and equipment. Adequate personnel must have primary responsibility for this task to allow for the timely servicing of all reported'offenses with a'.~obability ROUGH DRAFT of solution. The uniformed patrol officers must participate in the investigative process to a greater degree, a program designed to improve this participation is just getting under- way within the department. Resources outside the Mound Police Department must be utilized tO the fullest extent. We will continue to call upon the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office to provide forensic science services. Additionally, the department should utilize and participate in, whever appropriate, a newly formed mutual aid inter-agency special investi-. 9ation squad. .PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT The basic strength of the Mound Police Department lies in the strength of its personnel. It is critical the department recruit the most qualified and motivated personnel available when. hiring and support, retrain, and motivate seasoned personnel. To maintain job satisfaction among personnel requires constant retraining to improve per- formance, building towards a goal of excellence and the discharge of all tasks. The probability of retraining qualified officers is Vastly improved and job satisfaction increases with constant opportunity for retraining on routine skills and training to increase job' knowledge and strength. Since the department has limited opportunities for advancement, only one of three, at best, may reasonably expect assignement as a detective or supervisor, emphasis on career develop- ment should center on promoting the philosophy of creating highly trained law enforcement generalists. Each officer being SystemJtically trained and retrained in all applicable fields of expertise, from crime scenes search and patrol procedures to crime prevention and community relations. -7- ROUGH ~RAFT ADMINISTRATION The police department, as an agency of the city government of Mound, Spring Park, Minne- trista, and St. Bonifacius, is supported by tax revenue and is charged with a continuing duty to use public resources efficiently and with evidence of good stewardship. The effectiveness of the department is evident in that a high caliber of services is deli. ver~d at reasonable cost. This is.evidenced by the fact that Mound delivers an extremely high amount of total service per capita per police officer as compared to other agencies within Hennepin County. The number of personnel on the police department is the fewest per capita'for a full service department in the county. The department is operated on the lowest cost per man and per capita for a full service department in the county. It is important that in the future effort and care be taken to insure this cost effectiveness continues a~d expenditures be made only when they tend to increase effectiveness and improve operations and the delivery of service. Currently 13% of the sworn manpower resources of the department are dedicated to adminis- trative tasks. The remaining 87% are operational. There is little administrative redun- dancy and future manpower allocations should be carefully evaluated to insure this continues. The administration must continually strive for excellence and efficiency in operations. The record system has been reevaluated, modified, and improved to best service the current needs of the department. The system has been inspected by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and the determination was made that it is functional, effective, and in keeping with expected standards. The records system will continue to improve with the installation of the CJIS~NCIC computer terminal in the near future. Record keeping must be reevaluated and analyzed to insure a continued high standard. The cost of police equipment is a major concern, yet it is personnel which make up by far the largest portion of the departments financial resources. Policing is a labor intensing -8- ROUGH DRAFT work. No way has been found to more than marginally reduce the police department's dependence on its human ~esources. It is the productivity of its personnel which ultimately determines the police department's efficiency. The productivity of personnel is, in turn, dependent on careful selection, the thorough training, motivation to work and responsive support. Future efforts must concentrate on careful analysis of all equipment purchases to insure they are coSt effective, operational and of high quality. More importantly, maximum benefit must be obtained from our highest cost resource, personnel. The exceptional quality of the departmental personnel must be fostered thru constant emphasis on training which is intended to provide each police officer with a wide range of competence to deal more effectively with crime and order problems. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 4, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-109 SUBJECT: City Planner Attached is a letter from the Planner wherein he states that for a retainer of $500 per month, he would: With a specified base retainer per month contract, of for example $500, to accomplish and be responsible for the CDBG program, I would consider spend- lng a specified day of the week at City Hall. A specified base amount per Planning Commission report on zoning reviews would be established on the workload and be in addition to the base retainer funded from applications. Monthly Planning Commission and CityCouncil meetings would also be expected. The scheduled day would be a couple of days prior to issuing Planning Commis- sion reports and after Planning Commission agenda enclosure. Costs would be held down by using City clerical assistance for report typing and xeroxing, etc. My personal hourly charge is proposed at $20.00, based on the following incurred costs (1980). Per Hour Employee Salary $13.00 Vacation/Sick Leave 1.52 Insurance,health,life .25 Conferences/professional affiliations,periodicals .45 Employer FICA,SSA 4.18 Travel .35 $19.75 Ail grants and downtown redevelopment planning would be funded from the projects themselves. The attached letter points out that he would be willing to handle the work either on the above basis or on an hourly basis. The retainer basis is recommended and was so budgeted. ISBE , RIESENBERG, CHELS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2116 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 612-871-5628 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: LEONARD KOPP, CITY MANAGER CHUCK RIESENBERG, PLANNER 1980 PLANNING RETAINER PROPOSAL SEPTEMBER 20, 1979 At your direction I am pleased to submit the following proposal for professional planning services by retainer to match the needs of the City. The scope of services outlined are the work items separate from the existing comprehensive plan contract. If the City favors such a proposal, I would tentatively start work at the beginning of the year. By the first of the year, a majority of the comprehensive plan should be completed with significant parts of the $6,000 701 grant taken care of. I view Mound's planning need to be varied, i.e., CDBG administration, plan and zoning reviews, Planning Commission/City Council meetings, and grantsmanship at a scale of a part-time workload. CDBG Program - application preparation, HAP preparation, program execution, perfor- mance reports, liaison with Hennepin County, along with any specific administrative exercise, i.e., land acquisition, relocation, labor standards, equal opportunity, etc. (current year and expected administration fees - $9,000 yr.). Planning Zo.nin9 Proposals - to review and make recommendations on any development proposals involving platting, rezoning, conditional use permits, variances, etc. (city fees based on application) .~lannin9 Commission/City Council - meetings and public hearing meetings. Grants Writing - on a scale similar to acquiring the HUD 701 grant which would expand into park and housing grants, etc. Downtown Redevelopment Plan - frequently discussed in the last year, there are many interests in reviewing the possibility of Mound undertaking a downtown revitalization program, especially in light of proposed highway projects. Specific program participation would be with tax increment financing, etc., and involve new or renovated building construction accompanied by public improvements, etc.. In 1950, the City may want to address some of these opportunities along with CDBG funding and even. housing development projects as is earmarked in the upcoming years CDBG budget. Planning and Development Services To be able to offer a flexible proposal to the City, two alternative retainer agreements are available: a. a straight per hour contract based on need. b. a specified base retainer per month with per hour charged for any services provided beyond contract. With a specified base retainer per month contract, of for example $500, to accom- plish and be responsible for the CDBG program, I would consider spending a specified day of the week at City Hall. A specified base amount per Planning Commission report on zoning reviews would be established on the workload and be in addition to the base retainer funded from applications. Monthly Planning Commission and City Council meetings would also be expected. The scheduled day would be a couple of days prior to issuing Planning Commission reports and after Planning Commission agenda enclosure. Costs would be held down by using city clerical assistance for report typing and xeroxing, etc.. My personal hourly charge is proposed at $20.00, based on the following incurred costs (1980). Employee Salary Vacation/Sick Leave Insurance,health,life conferences/professional affiliations,periodicals employer FICA,SSA travel Per Hour 13.00 1.52 .25 .45 . 4.18 .35 $19.75 All grants and downtown redevelopment planning would be funded from the projects themselves. Please contact me with any clarifications or questions as they arise. Respectfully submitted, ct CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 5, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-110 SUBJECT: Report on Possible Police Locations Attached is a report from the Police Chief on the cost of remodeling three locations and the cost of operating and maintaining three loca- tions for a Police Headquarters. One item not taken into consideration in the report is availability to the public. The Police have many persons each day that visit their office for reporting incidents, getting copies of reports or informa- tion, etc. .The location of the Police Headquarters, therefore, should be considered from the standpoint of access by the citizens. The School has prepared a proposed lease for the school building's use, a copy is attached. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 5, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LeOnard Kopp - City Manager Charles Johnson - Chief of Police Police Space Utilization Report - Follow up In May of 1979 I submitted a detailed report of the feasibility of utilizing the Mound school as a police facility. Within this study, emphasis was placed on comparing the cost and feasibility of the school building as compared to new construction and to the present quarters. Since this report was submitted there have been further negotiations concerning the lease cost of the school and also a basic decision as to what and how extensive a building/remodeling program is economically feasible at this time. The cost of the school space will be approximately $2.06 per square foot in 1980. It is unlikely all desireable building or remodeling would be done at this time. Deleted from my recommendation was a firing range and expansion into the locker room area of the school. Purposed uses for this locker room space would be deleted or moved to the southern portion (current district office space) of the building. This would allow approximately 4,100 square feet for departmental use. To be further considered prior to formally making a decision to proceed with the facility is to compare the approximate cost for the school building as compared to the Island Park hall and the community center building. It is estimated that the operating, maintenance, and insurance costs for each building would be approximately the same. The only exception being the IP hall as it would require considerable more heat or extensive in- sulating. For the purpose of this report the cost of all three are estimated to be the same. Both the IP hall and the community center buildings are just outside shells and all interior space would be new construction. The exterior of these buildings would also require some alteration for entrances and windows to be adaptable for a police service. The windows are not a factor of consequence at the school because it is below grade. The following table gives estimated operating and construction or remodel- ing costs for each building: Tota! square footage Annual operations and maintenance ConStruction and/or remodeling cost Total Annual Cost: based on $I0,000 down from revenue sharing and remainder on 6% bonds and 10 year amortization Annual square foot cost IP Com~i~. School Hall Center 4,100 2,766 2,976 8,446 5,698 6,131 10,O00 82,980' 89,280* 8,446 25,673 27,744 2.06 9.28 9.32 Other factors that should be considered in arriving at a decision include, first, the location. The department should be located so as to provide easy access and accessibility to the public. We presently handle numerous walk-in requests for service each day (5-10 per hour) for such things as dog releases, vehicle releases, filing criminal complaints, retrieving property, indetifying property, interviews, advise, and. other matters. Of the three locations being considered, the school is by far the best as it is in the downtown area and in the population center of the jurisdiction. The community center building would be the second choice. Secondly, the size of both the community center and the IP hall are too small to accomodate present needs satisfactorily. Projecting ahead 10 years they would both need expansion. Each of the three locations bein§ considered are feasible and each would help to satisfy the specific needs of the police department. In carefully considering all factors; size, location, operating costs, and capital costs, it. is my recommendation that we utilize the Mound school building. It is further recommended that whichever location is selected we at this time hire an architect or draftsman to produce the necessary plans for construction or remodeling. Respectful ly, Charles J~:~hnson Chief of Police CJ:lao * Cost is based on $30 per square foot. the amount would be half. If cost was $15 per square foot POLICE SPACE UTILIZATION REPORT FEASIBILITY OF LEASING HOUND SCHOOL BUILDING LYNWOOD AND COHHERCE, HOUND, MINNESOTA Prepared by Chief Charles Johnson TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS AND SPACE UTILIZATION - Public Entrance/Foyer - Public Service Lobby - Clerical and Records - Staff Offices - Storage A. Evidence B. Departmental equipment C.' Departmental supplies - Squad Room - Prisoner Handling A. Prisoner processi.ng B. Adult detention/interview C. Juvenile detention/interview D. Prisoner entrance - Employee Service Space A. Employee entrance B. Locker room C. Rest room D. Exercize room E. Lunch room - Traini.ng/Briefing Room - Firi.ng Ra.nge - Parking SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS I NTJ~ODUCT I ON Over the past'few years the need.for an adequate police facility for the city has become widely recognized and accepted. The present quarters in the lower level of the city hall are lacking in nearly every aspect. Parking, vehicle storage and security, property security, public areas, staff areas, and prisoner handling areas are generally the inadequacies that must be addressed. In a recent management report and survey developed by an independant consultant these needs were re-emphasized as bei.ng critical. The City Council, the City Manager, and police management already had recognized these needs, and authorization has been given to analyze the feasibility of solving our space problems by utilizing the school building in downtown Mound which will be vacated by the school district during the summer of 1979. This report will detail the space and operational problems we presently have and discuss in detail solutions to these problems that would be met if the department were to utilize the school building. Obviously all the space problems could be met if a new building were to be constructed or major remodeling and additions were made to the city hall. This report will not address these solutions other than in very general terms for the purpose of price comparisons. The basic needs of a police facility include sufficient space and proper design to serve the three principal areas of the facility, these bei.ng public areas, staff service areas, and prisoner handling areas..In compari.ng 63 police facilities built nationally between January, 1974 and February 1978, it is found that the average space per person in each facility is 330 square feet..This ranges from a low of 87 square feet per staff member in Toledo, Ohio to a high of 918 square feet per staff member in New Town, North Dakota. Using the average of 330 square feet per staff member and figuring a staff of 22, the number recommended in the police management study, would indicate our present need tO be 7,260 square feet. This figure is of course just a guide for the purpose of preliminary planni.ng. Among key factors in considering a facility are its accessability to the public, its proximity within that community to best service staff requirements, and the ability to maintain security. The school facility appears to meet all these anticipated needs, both size and location. Details of its suitability will be addressed in further detail within this report. ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS AND SPACE UTILIZATION The following information is a detailed summary of all areas needed or desired for specific purposes within the police facility. Each specific area is titled and lists ils intended purpose, how and if the need is being met, and finally how or if the need could be met by utilization of the school facility. AREA: Public entrance/foyer PURPOSE: The police department is a 24 hour per day service department that must be readily and easily available for the public. Since our department is not manned within the office on a 24 hour basis, there should be a protected area open to the public around the clock to provide access to the police. The foyer should provide an emergency telephone for the public to contact an officer when the office is not manned. CURRENT STATUS: The public uses the main city hall entrance and has access only during business hours. There is no protected area after hours nor is there emergency access to an officer. The location of the city hall for any- one unfamiliar with the city is poor due to its distance off the main city roadway. It is difficult to reach by anyone on foot and.offers no - 1 - PROPOSAL: protection or assistance when an emergency exists. The school is centerally located in the center of town and would offer excellent access to the public. There is sufficient space and the current design allows fo~ the addition of a seperate street level entrance accessible to all people including the handicapped. AREA: Public service lobby PURPOSE: This space, just inside the foyer, serves as an area to service all general service requests from the public such as d. og and vehicle releases. This space should not allow free or unauthorized access to any other portion of the depart- ment, but should be convenient to allow the public, when authorized, further entranc~ when appropriate. This space should also allow for the posting of public information, displays of materials such as crime prevention brochures, and serve as a waiti.n9 area. It should be pleasant, open, and comfortable Since it serves as the welcome mat and first impression of the quality of public safety within the city. CURRENT STATUS: There is no waiting space other than the hallway by the service counter. Hand-out materials are placed on the planter ledge. PROPOSAL: The school will have adequate space and with minor remodeli.ng will meet all needs for the intended purpose of this space. AREA: Clerical and records PURPOSE: This space is utilized for all clerical tasks for all departmental personnel. Also for the storage and.retrieval of all reports and correspondence. The area should be secure so as to protect private and confidential material; yet must be close to the public entrance so as to'service requests. CURRENT STATUS: The space now provided would be sufficient if it were a protected area and used solely for its intended purpose. The current space is the center of the department and open to the public. Prisoners are held in this area and statements are taken in this area, both of which are very disruptive and inefficient. It is unsecure and provides easy access to unauthorized personnel. PROPOSAL: The school offers sufficient space and security to meet the intended purposes of this area. There would be little if any alteration needed. The space is adjacent to the public lo6by and would allow for excellent response to public inquiries. AREA: Staff offices A. Chief's Office B. Investigative/Supervisor C. Investigations D. Juvenile E. Special Services/Crime Prevention F. Patrol Supervisors - 2- CURREIlT STATUS: PROPOSAL: Staff.offices should provide privacy and secur[ty to allow for the efficient operation of the day to day work load. They are all used in addition to routine work space as places for interviews with the public and to service special requests for assistance and discussions of private and confidential matters of the public and with departmental personnel. They should be open, inviting, and cheerful; yet provide privacy to allow for uninterupted and free communication. The Chief's office should have sufficient spac~ to allow for at least six people to sit comfortably. Other offices should provide Sufficient room for at least four people to sit comfortably. They should be small enough to create a welcome and comfortable feeling, yet not so large as to create distractions. All office space now'used is cramped, inefficient, and provides no privacy. The Chief's office has'room for just one person and because of this there is no space to carry on private, confidential and uninter- upted conversations. On virtually a daily basis groups of individuals or families that desire to discuss problems with the chief come to the city hall. Since there is no'space for these conversations they generally must be carried on in the main office area or in the hallway. This creates an uncomfortable and inefficien~ atmosphere. All officers are little more than closets and have no room to meet with th~ public, sus- pects or prisoners. The investigative/supervisor, Investigator, and Juveni]e Officer share space that is too sma)l for even one person, let alone space for interviews. There is no space for the special services or crime prevention operations. In addition to routine work space all offices are also used for miscellaneous storage. The school has sufficient office space built and ready to meet all needs. There would be no remodelipg necessary and very little decorating that would be needed for them to be move-in ready. AREA: PURPOSE: CURRENT STATUS: Sto~ag? A. Evidence B. Departmental Equipment C.. Departmental Supplies This space is necessary primarily for the secure storage of physical evidence. To be admissable in court a chain of custody must be proven on all evidence and if the chain is broken the evidence is inadmissable and worthless to the case at hand. Inadequate or improper storage will break the chain and severely effect the outcome of a trial. Also the department takes into custody found property and property turned over to the department for safe keeping. It is essential this property be properly secured. Finally, the department maintains and utilizes a variety of equipment in the day to day operations. Among these items. are flares, ammunition, weapons, first aid supplies, etc., etc. It is essential these items be properly'stored to allow for efficient inventory control. At this time departmental storage facilities are poor at best, very in- secure to a large degree, and open to the public or unauthorized personnel. Evidence, stored property and departmental equipment and ~upplies are sub- ject to being misplaced or stolen. Over the past couple of years h~ndreds of dollars of property has in fact been stolen from the department. The PROPOSAL: most'recent incident involved the removal of a radio that had been seized as recovered stolen property. The city was obligated to pay for this loss to the rightful owner when it was found to have been removed from the Property room. At this time evidence is stored in an insecure makeshift area in the basement of the city hall. Other property and evidence is stored in the Anderson Bui'ldi.ng. Departmental equipment and supplies are stored in any place 'room can be found. Inventory control is impossible and security is nonexistant. The school has storage faciliti'es of s6fficient size to handle nearly ail stor~ge problems. They are secure, provide easy and efficient access and are in move-in condition. Little if any remodeli.ng or decorating would be necessary. AREA; PURPOSE: CURRENT STATUS: PROPOSAL: :S.~luad Room This area is utilized by all' employees as a briefi.ng room and central area to receive daily mail and memos and assignments. Schedules are posted along with other.departmental i'nformation in this area. Most information disseminated i'n this room is private o~.confidential therefore the publi.c or prisoners should not be allowed access. The area is also utilized on a daily basis by patrol dj'vision officers for the preparation and review of reports. The area now used for this purpose ~s little more 'than a closet, it also serves as a prisoner handling area, interview room, storage room, and equipment room. It is inefficient and cramped. When used to handle prisoners or when used for interviews it cannot be used for any of its other uses, thereby creati'.ng delay and causi'.ng severe security and safety problems. The school facility has space available which would require little or no remodellng or decorating that could serve all of the intended purposes for this space, AREA: PURPOSE: Prisoner handling A. Prisoner processing B. Adult detention/interview .C. Juvenile detention/interview D. Prisoner entrance These.areas are occupied or utilized for the processing of prisoners and should be secure and-safe. The health and safety of the public must be a primary concern so as to reduce the risk when confronted with a violent prisoner. The area should be totally out of public view and public con- tact. It must protect the right or privacy of juveniles. There should be no access by prisoners to any items that could be used as weapons either against the police or against themselves. The detention/interview areas should tend to be cheerful and create a relaxing, tranqull mood in prison- ers. There should be no access to any private or confidential matters of the public or the department. The prisoner entrance should be away CURRENT STATUS: PROPOSAL: from the public entrance so as to provide for safety and security. There should be sufficient secure space to hold prisoners, particularly disruptive prisoners, while awaiting transfer to the Hennepin County Jail, or in case of'juveniles, while wai'ting parents or guardians, The detention area should be totally out of public view and access so as to minimize disruption and maximize security. Prisoner handli.ng at this time is inadequate and offers 'no security and presents a safety hazard to the public, city employees, and officers. The entire processing procedure is in public areas or areas visible to the public. A disruptive prisoner can and is heard throughout the city hall, an obviously unsatisfactory s~tuation. There is no secure or private space to interview prisoners or to run breathalizer tests. The only space available is cluttered with departmental infOrmation, eqUip- ment, and supplies. This creates an unnecessary personal safety hazard for the officers. The school has a seperate entrance available which could be utilized for both prisoners and employees. Nearby this entrance the design of the buildi.ng is such that it will allow for the processing, testing, inter- view, and secure detention of prisoners totally outs'ide of p~blic view and access. .The space for this purpose is'adequate and would require only minor remod~li.ng to be functional, The ability to securely hold prisoners for short per[ods will not only be safer and less disruptive but wil.1 be far more efficient by allowi.ng officers to prepare arrest reports while awaiting transportation for the prisoner to the Hennepin County ~ail. AREA: .PURPOSE: CURRENT STATUS: PROPOSAL: iEmployee service space A.. Employee entrance B. Locker room Rest room. D. Exercize room E. Lunch room This space is to be designed to add to the general efficiency of the department and to contribute to good moral'e by providing necessary room to service employee needs. A seperate entrance would be near the seperate employee parking lot. The need for the restrooms is obvious. The locker room and exercize room provide a private area to keep personal equipment and uniforms-used on a daily basis. Adjacent to the locker room should be an employee shower area. An exercize room will provide space for equipment to allow for physical work outs to maintain a program of physical conditioning. An officer in good physical condition has been shown to be more efficient and effective. Additionally, proper physical fitness decreases stress, descreases the chance for injury, and increases or adds to a feeling of well.being. None of this space is now available with the exception of the restroom, but this is also used for 'evidence and property storage. It is cluttered and certainly less than desireable. The nature of the school is such that space is available to meet all the department's needs for these general purposes' with little or no remodeling or decorating. No structural changes are necessay and the space is nearly -5- in move-in condition. AREA: PURPOSE: CURRENT STATUS: PROPOSAL: Training/Briefing. room A. Departmental training/meetings B. Reserve training/meetings C. Explorer training/meetings D. E.O.C. (Emergency operating center) This is a multi-purpose area used not only for departmental training and meetings, but also an area to meet auxiliary department/community needs. An area available for the police Reserves not only for their own meetings but also to service requests for community training. Additionally it should be used by the Explorer Post and other communlt¥ groups as necessary. An equally, if not more important use, would be to serve as an emergency operating center and command post in any time of natural or man made disaster. It should be equipped with sufficient equipment and information to allow community leaders an' instantly avail- able area from which to operate. There is no area available now that is' designed for these purposes. Space for meetings and traini.ng is now borrowed as'can'best be done. Some traini.ng is done in the council chambers but this is not satisfactory due to the disruption it causes to both individuals involved in training and the remainder of the city staff while they are conducting routine business. The school has a readily available space to service this purpose with little or no remodeli.ng or decorating necessary. Not only would it meet training and meeting needs, but it makes an ideal emergency operat- ing'center in that the building is sound and rated as the safest within the city for withstanding natural or man made disasters. The only al- teration necessary to ~ully meet emergency needs is the installation of an emergency electrical generator. AREA: PURPOSE: CURRENT STATUS: Fi r ing .Ran. 9.e Firearms traini.ng is certainl'y one of the most important needs of the department and an all weather facility designed to meet these needs is very desireable. The very nature of the use of firearms as a defensive weapon certainly allows very little room for error, and the only way the probability of error, can be reduced is with regular and professional traini.ng. This area should serve a dual purpose by being available not only to meet departmental training needs, but also to meet community needs for this type of facility to provide for both youth and adult firearms safety training. An adequate firearm training facility is not readily available. We currently use the Gun Club property on Cty. Rd. 15 for some training and at other times use the area behind the Minnetrista city hall. Neither of these areas is properly equiped to meet the desireable 'levels of -6- PROPOSAL: training or a police officer. There is space of sufficient size and safe design in. the school for this purpose. Some remodeling would be necessary, particularly remodeling or adding to the ventilation system. However no major structural changes would be necessary. There is no question the cost of the facility would be far outweighed by the added training it would provide for both'depart- ment and community. · Should the training ever result in preventing even one accident it will have paid for itself. AREA: PURPOSE: CURREflT STATUS: PROPOSAL: ~arking A. Public B. Employee C.' Department Sufficient public parking is necessary to allow easy and safe access to the police facility by the public. Adequate departmental and employee parking is necessary to provide both space and security for the costly mobile equipment used by the department. Departmental vehicles should have an.enclosed gaEage area to keep to a minimum thefts and vandalism. At this time there is one main, relatively small, parking area which must be u~ilized by all public visitors to the city hall and police department together with departmental vehicles. The space is barely adequate to service public demand. The parking lot is inadequate and offers no security for departmental vehicles and equipment. Additionally, utilizing this parking lot. for the handling of prisoners is a personal safety hazard to the public~ city employees, and the officers involved. The school facility offers two seperate parking areas. The area on the south side of the building could be utilized by the public and it would provide for ready access to the publfc entrance. The area to the north of the building has sufficient space to allow for employee parking and a garage facility to be utilized for both the handling of prisoners and the storage of departmental vehicles and mobile equipment. -7- ~UMMAR¥ It appears that utilization of the Mound School facility would be practical and that it can and will meet our current and projected needs, with a mlntmum of construction, remodeling, or redecorating. The building is located ideally within the community for access by the public and service to the public. The building appears structurally sound a~d rated as such by the DCBA. The basic design, location, and size of existi.ng rooms, offices, and parki.ng lend themselves to'easy adaption for police and emergency services. The square foot~ge available meets our current needs and allows for future expansion when needed. The cost of building and equipping a new facility of similar size is estimated to cost $540,000 to $545,000. Although impossible at this time to accurately estimate the cost for the school, it is unlikely the cost would be more than 10% of the cost of a new construction, and probably will be far less. Precise estimates will be available upon completion'of plans. The cost of new construction for interest alone ls estimated to be in excess of $5 per square foot per year and added to this would be maintenance, insurance, utili.ties.-Although a firm rental price is not yet been negotiated with the school district, it is estimated the cost to be approximately $1.50 to $'2.00 per square foot per year. This cost would include all operations (.gas, electric, etc.) insurance, and maintenance. From'the cost view point, the school appears to be a wise decision. An additional consideration, of course, is that a public buildi.ng which was built at' tax payers expense, but no longer needed for its o[iginal purp0se~ is now able to continue as a public ~ervice facility, used for a different purpose, and ultimately savi.ng tax payers money. Also to be considered is the additional space that would be turned back to the general City administration. The room may well be more than adequate to meet the require- ments of other City departments such as city clerk, buildi.ng inspector, or city planner without additional cost. RECOMMENDATIONS .. The City Council approve in concept the feasibility' of utilization of the lower level of the Mound school buildi.ng for a police facility. That we enter into further negotiations with the school district to reach a tentative lease agreement. 'The .agreement should include, in addition, a cost .agreement on services to be provided such as utilities, maintenanc6, etc. and length of the lease. It should be recommended to be at least ten years Hire an architectural firm to draw up plans and specifications for necessary con~ struction, remodeling, and decorating. Since this is a special purpose facility, it is strongly recommended to hire a specialist in the fi. eld of police facility des. ign. Two. firms with such experience and'with, excellent credentials and recommendations are: Steven R. Polson, RA Polson Architects 402 West Dodson Drive Urbana, IllinOis 61801 Marian J. Varner, FARA Marian J..Varner' & Associates 524 South Rosemead Blvd. Pasadena, California 91107 The architectural specialist should be the primary architect, however, he should work with the regularly.contracted school architectural f~rm on an advisory basis. There are many unique design, constructions, mechanical, and electrical considerations in a police facility. The services of a specialist in this fi/eld will insure that these special needs are satisfied in a cost-effective manner. Upon completion of plans and specifications, bid quotes should be obtained to be presented to the City Council for the purpose of making a final decision on the utilization of the school facility for the police department. -8- ~h, La ~l~lellD~r~, ~u~ in du~Ucate u~, ................................. ~ oi .......... ~.c:oh~ ........................ m;'.~.. '. byan~be~e~ L~.~er. dan~ School ~$~ric~ ~.To. 277 herdnaiter desigtated and re~erred to as lessor, and Cig7 of llour, d hereinaker designated and referred to u tenant, Wm~e.ss~: T~ said lessor iu considerafiou o~ the rents and covenants hereinafter mentionecL to be l~id and performed by said tenant, does hereby demise, le~se and let unto the said tenant, and the sa/d tenant does hereby' hLre and take from the said lessor, the following described premises s~tuate in the .Ci~r oL.~,~O?~'--'%~. ...................................................... co,~t~ of .......... ~'-:.~%A.e.2.~ ....................................................... State o~ ........ ~L~_e..~.9..:..~ ....................................................... to-wit: To Hxw ,ao To Hoco the above premises just as tt~y a.,'e, without any ~biffty or obffg~tiou on the pan o~ said lessor of ~ any alterations, improvements or repairs of any Mhd on or about said pren~.~s or the building or b~- ings (d which they are · part, or the equipment, Excures, plumbing, appliances, or machinery' in, upon or serving same, or the streets, alleys, areas, arca-w~ys or pusage~ adjoining' or appurtermnt thereto, for the term of !0 y~ro~and aitet the .............. '1 a::. .......... ctay of. .............. ~a.~.a~,,~:. ....... 19 .~.9..., to the~ ........... I~..~ ........... day d. ........ :~O:~'~,T,~. .................. 19 ...~.9.., both dates inclusive, for the following pmToses and for no other purposes, to-wit: Police the ~aid tenant agrees to and with said lessor to pay the lessor a~ rent £or the above mmfioned premises ~ ;~._-~ ~ider ............................................................ l~lial~(a~:...~,._~-..;~c~ parable in advance on the first d~y of each ~nd every month lot md during the fidl tetra oi this lease, at the office oL...L.'.':L~...~.~a.G..O.: ...................................................................................... The said tenant also covenants and a~ees w~th the lessor pt~b~ witboot first ob~emg the In,soPs ~tten sent ~ t~t he ~11 eot use ot p~t ~y~g p~ise~ that ~tl incrc~e the ~te of nsurance ~er~n, or aay~ing that my be ~g~l to ~e of 1~ ~11 not in any ~ner deice or injure ~d de~ ~ ot ~y p~ thief, or o~rl~d the ~t an~iag to he done u~n ~d pr~s~ or adjacent th~eto, t~t ~11 amount to or cr~te ~d that he wi~ not ~ s~d premises ot permit the or any pa~ ther~i to be us~ ~or Iod~ng or poses, or [or any pe~ose co~t~ ~ the laws, o~ina~c~ ot re~tions oi the Unit~ S~tes of Amefi~ or the S~te re~u~ation~ o[ the City o~ ................. ~;~ Of o~ any bo~ds Or o~cers o~ ~d city; ~d the te~t :o tetur~ said premise~ peaceably an~ promptly at the cod oi the te~ oi this le~e. or al ~y ptevioos reli- ction th~L in M ~d ~nditlon ~ the same ~e now in or ~y heckler be ~ut in. loss br tiro and ord~ c~t~ And the te~at fu~er coven~ts and x~ess misuse water, electricity, gas. steam, or any other utilities ot agencies which are or may be ~urnished by the lessor, and to promptly par xi! rates, costs and chzr~es /or the ~ame. except as to such of the s~e. i~ any. as the les~r h~ sg~cally agreed herein to ~u~ish ~r~ o~ ch~ Lessee shah not erect or permit to be erected on said premL~es, any sig~s on the exterior oi the premises or build- ing~ without the written consent of lesso~ endorsed hereon nor place or permit to be pLxced in ~ny portion o! ~ny of the demised premises any weight or weights in excess of the re~oexble or safe c.~Ting capacity of the stt~ctute. . T~e tenant acknowledges the receipt oi the demlse~ prem- .~es and the same to be in good and ~anitat7 condition, and tn ~ repair, and the taking p~ssessioo of the dembe~ premises by the tenant shall be conclusive evidence tl~t the demised premises. ~nd the equipment, plumbing, drain~, fix- totes, appliances and macMnery therein, were at the t~me so taking Dosaession thereof in ~ clean, sanitary and tenantable condition, and in all r~s~cts satL~fat.'toty ~d. · acceptable to the ten, at. and in the condition in which they were represented to the ten~nt to be and agreed tn be put in by the lessor: and the temmt hereby relea-se$ the leant from a. ny and ~11 claLms a~ising from any defect in the condi. lion nj said demised premise~ or the equipment, fixtures or appliances in or ser~nw said premises. ~nd the building er buddings o! which they ~te a p~rt. and the street1, alleys. arsas, area. ways. pmage~ or sidewal~ adjoining appurtenant thereto. The tenant agrees thee he wiff not sublet the dembed premises: or any pm thereof, and ~ not usign thL~ !e~e or ~y tater~t there~ nor pe~t such leMe to b~e t~ste~ ~ o~fion of ~w or oth~ ~d ~at no ~ or ~ ~ be do~ ot suee~ whereby ~e ~e ~y ~ or b~me subl~ ot ~i~ in whole or ~ p~ u~ ~e w~tten con~t of the [~ endo~ th~ shah be ~t ob~ in ~ ~d ~e~ ~ o~ und~l~ng or utah- merit. ~ ~er s~ ~mm ~e to ~e ~r or be doW~ ~d t~t nothing what~t sh~l be h~d to be · ~v~ o~ ~ su~e the n~eesi~ of su~ ~rs~e~L Any usi~nment, sale in bankruptcy or insolvency ot the Insane may. at the option of the lessor, be consider~ ~ ~si~ent within the meanin~ ot :h~ Ieee and ~ ~ bre~ oi ~e Covenan~ her~L The tenant further agrees that the lessor sl~ll not be liable for ~y d~e, either to person or pers0u or erty or the loss of property sust~oed by the tenant, or by any ,ot~..?. pervo or. persona due to the demised pren~se~ or the omimngs of which the demised prem~es are a part, or the equipment, fixtures, appllaJmces or machinery in or upon the same. or the ~ passages, areas, ace-a~*Jvaye and side- walks or streets adloining or appurten,~zt tn the. s3Jme being or beconfing out of repair or defective, or due to the happen- lng of an}' accident, or due to any act or neglect of the tenant, or any tenint or occugumt ofssld building, or of any O.thEw ~ pe..'sons or corpor~tione, or by the bursting oi ptpor, or b,jf the usm or mlauss of any in~trmnent~liry or agency in or connected with the demised ~remises o.r the building of which it ia a pan, or occasioned 07 any nmsance mad~ or suffered tlazeon or there~ The tenant further covet,nnts and agrees that the service of not,ce by any ott~eer o! the C~ty ........... upon either party to th~ lease to ~exn ~id premi.~ or to do any other act in connection therewith, ~ be conrl~ive evidence u between the parties hereto of the breach by the tenant of the Covenant with respe~ to the non-performance of which by tho ten:mt suCh no6ce ~ been Any notice from the lessor to the tenant, relating to the demised pre.es or the occupancy thereof, shaf he deemed duly served R le~t at the demised premises addressed to the tenant. The tenant further covenants and agrees at its own expense m observe and keep af regulations and requirements of the ci~ of _ ~__~x~z__O. .... - -or other puS- lie authoritie~ in force at the tim* of the taking possee~ion hy the tenant of the demieed premises or which m~y thereaher be made regarding the condition and cooducz of said d~. ~ pret~fi~, any pact thereof, and the sidew'alk~ adjacent thereto, incindlng af budding, fire. ~ita~, police or other · regulations. X~e~'~Takia~. The tenant further agrees that ff th.e demhed prem~e.' s..or any part thereof, or any part of the tmprovemen~ o! whtch they form a part. shall be taken .for any street, or other pub- lic use, or shaft during the continuance of this lea~e be de- stroyed by the action of the public autho~fies, then this lease *nd the term den,,ed shall thereupon terminate. Deema~m It is further agreed benveen the lessor and the te~xnt that if dut'~g the term of this le~e the demised pre=~es or the improvements thereon shall be injured or destroyed by fire or the elements, or through any other c~nae, so a~ to render the dement prem~es unfit for occupancy, or makes it impos- sible to conduct th~ business of the tenant thereon, or to suCh an extent that they cannot be repaY'ed with reasonable dili- gence within thil'ty (.30) days from the happening of such injury, then the lessor ~y terminate this lea. se and the to. tm herein demised from the date of suCh damage or destrvc*Jon. and the tec~nt shaJ.t immediately surrender the demised pre.es and all interest therei.n tn .the lesSOr, and the ant shall pay rent ouly to. the .t~n.e or suCh surrender;, anQ tn case of any suCh d~trocttoo or mlury t~e lesSOr may re-enter and repos3ess tho demised .prem/ses. dis .cia. aria,ed o!, thla and ~Y d~po~s .MI p.~rlses then m.pos, s,e?s~o.n tnt,rent. if the demised pren~ses c~n be restor~ w~tmn sx.xty nays t days from the h~ppenioig of tho injury thereto, aJld the iessor ~ within fifteen (15) days from the occurrence o~ such injury elects in writing to SO repair or restore said premises within X*:~mb*s s/xty (60) days from the happening ot the injury thereto, then this leaSe shall not end or terminate on account oi such injury hy llre or other~*ise, b. ut t~.e rent shall, not run or accrue aJtel' the injw~ and during tnt profess ot repairs, and up to the time when the rep~'S sh~Jl ~e completed, except only that '.he tenant shatl during' such t~'~e pay a pro rata portion oi such rent apportioned to '.be portion o~ the de.. raised premiso which ace in condition for occupancy or which m~y be actually occupied durin~ such repalrin~ pe~o~. if, however, the demised ?.~remises shaf be so sllgntl? iured by any cause, aioresaid. 3~ not to be rendered =nnt :or occupancy, .*hen the iessor shall repair .'.he s~e ~itb rexson- able promptness, and ~ ghat case the rent ~hai! not cease or be zhated d, urin~ su~n .*~.pa~ing pe~od..MI i~prove~.ents or bette .rm..ents placed 5y '.~e ~ena=t o= t~e ~emised shaf, however, ~ any even;. ~e re?aire~ and ,'epiacc~ ~y · '~he lessor agrees and covenants :hat the ,chant. on F.~a~zet. the rent and performicg :~e covenants .aic*r,es~id: sha~.), :.~, may ~eaceably and quietly ~ave, ::oid an,l :nloy the sa~u mised .~remi.~es /or the :e-.*m aforesaid, except as tn this iease otherwise provkie~. The le~or a~'ees that it ~e premis, hereby teased sl~ll ~ ~e ~e her~nbefore s~p~ted ~r ~e be~nn~i 0( ~i t~ of t~ le~. be in ~e ~ss~s~u ~d ~p~ Oi ~y n ~t law~ully enfid~ to s~d ~s~n ~d o~, · lessor sh~ use due ~gen~ to ob~a p~se~mn of for ~e le~e~ buc it 5 e~re~ly underst~ ~d agre~ ~t the le~r, using due dffi~ence as ~iofo~ sh~ not ~y way be l~ble for ~y f~e to obtmn the ~s~s~ion of · e pries for the les~e and ~g ~ le~ s~l not be ~ted ~n ~y way by ~y such farine to ob~M ~ess~n ~pt ~at the ren~a hereun~ sh~ he ~at~ un~ ~ ~iou sh~ ~ secur~ by the 1~r for th* less~ and ten notice to ~at ~ect given by t~e loser ~ tho les~ h ~ ~d~st~ ~ ~ ~th r~ct to ~ ~te~ons ~d rep~& imp~eme~ or ~te~ to ~d de~d. r~es, or ~y p~ ~er~, w~ s~ o~y be ~ the ~ co~nt oi ~e Ies~r, thtt t~t s~ a~ ~ ~ inspect s~ve s~d ~es~r ~d s~d pr~ forev~ ~ess ~d free from ~ cost~ ~m~ loss ~d ~ ev~ ~d ~d ch~ter w~ ~y be c~me~ or ch~ge~ ~u~ng ~b~W to adj~ent o~ers b~ u~ · e ~ts of negligence of ~d te~ or th~ ~en~ ~ors or employ~ or u~n t~ neg~igen~ oz ~y oth~ pe~n or per~na ~ or a~ut ~d pf~o or u~ ute oi ~ or eider oi th~ to obse~e ~d ~mply ~ the req~t o[ ~ ~w or ~ ~ r~la~ of ~ ~es~d~Wof · ~. ............................ ~ ~ pres~e ~d hold t~e les~r ~d s~ pre~ ~ ~ ~d ~ f~m ~e~ for h~r ~d ~t~ ~- ~he~ .~d ~e te~t a~ees ~t it ~ fr~ ~ ~ ~e sa~i~to~ to ~e les~r con~fioned f~ thu peyotes by ~e t~nt of ~e ~ers ~d thln~ ~ ~ ~u~ed to be do~ by ~e te~ Xt is fu~h~ a~ be~een ~e les~r and t~t I~e ~ ~d~ u~a ~e ~n~fion that ~ ~ te~t n~t or f~ to ke~, obs~e ~d ~rio~ ~y oi the ~v~ ~ ~d a~en~ ~n~n~ in this 1~ whi~ ~c to hold i~eres~ ot th~ ~ s~ be ~en ou ~goa or o~er pr~css oi inw, or ~ ~e ~e~ sh~ peggon to he or be de~ b~p~ or in~lveu~ accor~ng to ~w. or ii the te~t s~ vitae s~d pre.es or ~don the s~e d~n~ ~e te~ oi ~ l~ then ~d in ~ oi s~d ~ th~ out iu~er notice or demn~ enter into ~d u~n ~d p~es. or any p~ .~er~i. in the name of the whole. ~e ~]ute possession oi the same fully and absointel~, wi~ou~ su~ r~en~ wor~ng a /o~eimre oi ~e rents be p~d ~d ~e ~ve~ to be periom~ by the lessee for · e fu~ te~ of th~ le~e, and my a~ the le~Fs election Ieee or sublet s~d pre~s, or ~y pa~ lher~i, on such le~s and conditions ~d ior su~ :en~ ~d for ~uch t~e · e les~r my el~ ~d ~ter ~e~ting the rent scaly ~[l~ed by the l~r irom su~ relett~g ~' :he ren~is ~tipulated to be p~d u~der th~ Ieee by the te~t from time to tim~ ~He~ from ~he tenet ~y b~ce rema~n~ due from ~e to ~e on the rent re~ under thb le~ ch~ to ~e te~nt such r~onxble ~enses as the ~y ~d ~ put~g ~e pre.es in ten~ble con~o~ Or the loser my at h~ eiec~on ~d u~n ~t~an notice to the tenet d~e ~ ieee fo~zed ~d voi~ ~d thereu~n re~flt~ ~d t~e fu~ ~d xb~lute possession s~d pr~ ~ the o~er ~er~i, ~d iree i~m ~ fight ~ ~ of the cen~ or any person or per. ns :hroug~ or ~nder the t~nt; and su~ eicon and l~t menfion~ sh~i be and con~tute an ab~lute b~ to fight to ent~ by :he tenet upon ~he payment of ~l ~- ~es of r~t ~d ~s~ ~c~ z dh~session ~der any suit or pr~ess ior br~h oi any of ~e coven~ oi 1~ le~ ~d the commenc~ent by the l~r of ~y action to recover ~sion oi ~d pr~ zior~ s~ he deem~ x cient notice oi tie.on o~ ~d I~r to ~ext this ieee void ~d c~te~ ~thout the ~en ~o~ce above i~ u~s ~e ies~r shaf in ~n~. be/ore b~n~g p~ding, ~o~ the te~t that ~er obtainw su~ session ~e l~r ~ ~n~ue to l~k to ~e ten~z ior ~e pe~o~c~ o{ th~ l~se ~d wffi sub.s ~e ~remises the ten~t's ~oun~ in the milner ~ a~ve p~ge~ The te~i foyer a~ees ~ ~ g~ ~tte~ ~d per~ pro~ beloff~s~o s~d ~eu~L which or may be put into ~d de.ed premise~ sh~l at ~1 ~ be ~und ~th z lien in favor oi s~d Ies~r. to be charzeable for ~ reu~ hereunder ~d the ~[Iment of the other coveuan:s ~d agr~ents herein cont~n~ a~d that ~ ~e o{ deizutt by the tenet ~he lessor may without no~ r~ve :he or any pas oi the s~e. ~ such ~fl~ ~ the lessor ch~se, and the lessor s~l h~ve the fi~ht to sell ~1 or any pan o{ the s~e at public of p~te s~e. without ~nG any notice co Iht te~t oi such ~e. ~d to apply l~e pr~ C~ of su~ S~e ~rst ~o th~ Pzym~nt o~ the costs a~d penses oi conduc~ ~d ~e znd caring for a=d s~orin~ such pro.ny, zed to app[y the b~ance, ff any, to the ~ou~t then d~e ~rom the te~t to the loser. It is further agreed between the parties to this lcue: Lessee. upon le~vin$ the premises hereby leued, shail at hi~ own expense remove ~I1 ashes, dh't, rubbish and refuse, ·nd upon lessee's failure so to do, lessor n~y immediately without further notice to lessee do ~he s~me at lesson's pease, which the lessee shall immediately pay upon receipt of & b~ for s~ne irum lessor. T~e tenant further agrees to give the lessor written notice thlrcy ($0) daTs before the expiration of this lease of intention to ~acate at the end of this lease otherwise the lessor will have the option o/ conOnuing this lease ior one year trom and niter the expiration oi this lease without notice to the tenant. If. however, the lessor does not elect to so continue this lease and the tenant remains in said prem- Uses niter the expiration ol the term oi this lease, such re- maining in possession shall not. except at the option of the lessor, extend the term oi this lease, and the tenant shall promptly vacate said premises:, and ii for any reason the ten- ant does not promptly xntcate the premises at the end oi the term, the tenant agrees to pay the lessor, for soch time as elapses between the end of the term of this lease and the ti~e when the tenant ac~uall.v vacates the premises, a pro rata rental equal to one and one-half (I~) times the rent provided to be paid during the term of the lease. The tenant agrees that no assent, express or implied, by the lessor to any breach of any of the tenant's covenants or a&n'erments shall be deemed or taken :o be a waiver of any succeeding breach of such covenant. The lessor shall ac ail times hav~ tho risht to enter upon said premises to inspect their ~ondition, and at his election to n~ke reasonable and neeessa;7 repn~'s thereon (or the protection and preserv-4tion thereof, but nothing herein shail be construed to req~'e the lessor to ma.~ such rL~ai:~ and the lessor shail not be liable to the ten~nt, or any other per- son or persons, for faihu'e or del~y in m~:i~g, said repairs. or for damage or injury to person or propem'y caused in or by the making of such repairs, or the doing of such The lessor shall have the right during the last JO days oi the term oi this lease to place ~nd maintain on the demised premises Md in the windows thereof the usuai notice of "To Let" or "To Rent." ~.nd to show said premises to pro. spective tenants. ~ch of the covenants, provisions, terms und of this lease shall inure to the benefit of and shall be obliga- tory upon the respective heirs, executors, edminist~tOrs, suc- cessors and assigns of the lessor and tenant respec:is'ely. There are no understandings or agreements out~ide of this lease. L-t T~..vmto~t¥ WR?=azo~ the lessor and tenant l~vc hereunto set their hands a~d seals the day and ye-at first written. We, the tenant, hereby acknowledge that at the time oi making and delive~ oi this :ease and mortgage lien, the Lessor delivered to us a full, nme and complete copy oi same. Signed, sealed and delivered in presence oi: As to Lessor. ...... (~.~] ...................................................................................... ...................................................................................... [s~.] ...................................................................................... ST3.TI: OF ......................... ~ COUNTY OF (.ss. On ~ ....... ~.. o! ....... to ........... bejore me. ~ .Votary Public u~:hln and for said County. ,oersc~al~y to rnt .~er:tonally ~nc/',z'n, U.ho. btinq ~y ,ne duly r,t. orn. ~id say that they are :kc )':.ct-,~re~dent and .~ecrerary c? :;~e Ccrferation named in :he';cr.'~$in~ ..',~tr~rntnt. and tPat t~t ~eal J~,rtd to xmd ~nstrurn4'~t it *.Itt '..'r~orat# real o[ xaid corpora:ion, zr.d :bat :aid o'igned ~nd ~¢al;d in behalf o~ said cor?o,a:ion by .;uti~o,ity o/its ,~oard 3nd ~aid lckno~'itdce~ s~id instrument to 5e :$:e ;~ee ac: and ~ted of ~ation. COUNTY OF ..... .. } STAT£ OF ...................................... ~ b~tor~ ~, ~ .................................................................................... ~ith~ and ~Jr said Co~, ~1o~ ~p~t~rc~ ....................... :o ~e ~n~ to bt the g~son de~c~bed :n ;~ u'ho executed ~me ~ . ~te att a~ ~eed. Assignment For value ra:~ved, the undersign~ hereby ~e, ~s, ~sf~. md ~ ~ figh~ fide ~d int~st to ~e wi~in l~e and p~ therein descried; It ~ing und~stood, however, 't~ ~f~ is no way rd~ ~d t~nt from ~s liabi~w for the ~iomnce o[ aU the tern, coverts md paym~ of t~ ~d~ ~d For val.ue received .................................... ~ ................................................ hereby a.~umes all t,t~. ',!:'gadons ~d~' the t~ of ~e within 1~ and a~ to pe~o~ ~n sgpu~, p~s~t m the a~ve ~r~ent. ~e with~ l~dlord hereby consents to ~he a~ve Dated thi~......: ............. .'. ............. day o~ ....................................................... A. D. 19 ........ RIDER TO LEASE DATED October 1979 i. It is the intent of the parties hereto that rental shall cover only the actual cost to lessor of providing space and services. Lessee shall reimbuzse lessor for its pro rata share of the total operation and maintenance of the entire school plant plus 15% for administration and incidentals. No amount shall be paid toward depreciation or interest. The lessee shall pay said sums quarterly in an amount estimated by lessor. Each August the parties shall adjust in cash any underpayment or ov.erpayment for the previous fiscal year ending June 30th as shall be determined as follows: The total sums for operation of plant, ~aintenance of Plant, contmibution to employees' retirement for operation and maintenance personnel, property insumance and employee insumance for operation and maintenance personnel, shall be divided by the total' square feet in all school buildings to arrive at a cost per square foot to operate and maintain space. %]~is figure shall be increased by 15% to cover administration and incidental costs. It shall then be multiplied by 4100, which is the total square feet being leased herein. ~aese figures shall be taken from the school's annual financial report and the total square footage shall be taken from custodial allocation page of the school's annual budget report. If this lease had been in effect during the 1978-1979 fiscal year, calculations on the above basis would have been made as follows: 590 Total operation of plant $524,670.00 620 Total maintenance of plant $246,328.00 626 Contribution to employees' retirement (operation and maintenance personnel) Property insurance Employee insurance operation and maintenance personnel 628 635 $ 39,505.00 $ 27,577.00 $ 18,369.00 TOTAL "~ 449.00' ........ 856~449 515,000 = $1.66 plus 15% $1.66 .25 YIVTr/sq. ft. Z~e nun~ers in the left column are code classification numbers as u~ad in the 1978-1979 annual financial report and may vary from year to year but comparable codes shall be used. 2. In addition to the interior space being leasad, tha south pa=king lot, except for 3 spaces, will be reserved for the use of t~e lessee. Im return the lessee shall maintain all of said lot and shall plow snow in the north lot and ~e west alley. Lessor shall maintain the lawn around the rental area and the parking lot. 3. Except for snow plowing, all maintenance shall be the re- sponsibility of the lessor. Ail work shall be done to the'same standards as the lessor shall obse_~ve throughout all of its property. Snow plowing by lessee shall also be maintained to said standards. Snow plowing shall normally be completed by 7:00 a.m. 4. It is contemplated that the lessee will construct a new outside entrance and otherwise remodel the premises. No work shall be commenced without written approval from lessor. Ail expenses of any nature in connection with said construction and remodeling shall be promptly paid by lessee. 5. At any time after November 1, 1984, lessor, or its assigns, may cancel this lease by giving six months ~itten notice to lessee, and tendering to lessee its unamortized cost of lease- hold improvements based on a 10 year amortization from November 1, 1979 to November 1, 1989. 6. ~is lease being between two governmental subdivisions on a non profit basis, the parties hereto believe it is exempt from taxation. If a tax under ~nnesota Statute 272.68 or any other statute be claimed by Hennepin COunty or any other ~az~ng authority, this lease shall be immediately terminated° 2 October 1979 Mound City Council City Hall Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Councilmembers: I am impressed with the paving program that is taking place on Phelps Island this year. The roads, stone walls, curbs and sideWalk on Tuxedo all add to the natural beauty of the island. There is probably no other one thing that could be done to increase the quality of life so significantly. I have lived on the island for three years and with this one single stroke, you have convinced me that some (maybe all?) of my tax dollars are being spent very wisely. Yours sincerely, ~ 4763 Island View Drive Mound, Minnesota 55364 MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DIS~HICT L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE October, 1979 Saturday 10-13-79 Water Structures & Environment Committee 7:30 a.m. - please contact office for location Monday 10-15-79 Lake Use Committee 4:30 p.m., I2,~CD Office, Wayzata Saturday 10-20-79 Executive Committee 7:30 a.m. - pleaSe contact office for location Wednesday 10-24-79 Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors 8 p.m., Tonka Bay Village Hall 4901Manitou Road (County Road 19) 10-4-79 3.2'31 American Legion Post 398 GAMBLING REPORT DATE S~T_ 30, ~-979 CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE / GROSS: EXPENSES: .... ~ .~A~,WS T~X ~113.19 SuPPL[~S ~2o .~O PAYOUT AS PRIZES: . ¢:]--~7~. 99 ~7oo.oo ¢1800.77 ~7200.00 ~A63.23 DISTRIBUTION OF PROFITS: - AI. AWo ~50.O0 CANCER SOCIETY ~300~,00 ~397~n0~, ~ TO: FROM: RE: association of · metropolitan municibalitiee o to, er CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIAL, HENNEPiN C~UNTY CITIES VERN PETERSON , AMM EXEC'UTIVE DIRECTOR HENNEPIN COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL (Hc. cJcc) .. Some time ago, I Sent you a letter requesting recommendations. for two elected official vacancies on the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council. I have now received the names of two persons who would like to serve on this Council. The purpose of this memo is to give your city the opportunitg to vote on the recommendation.' After this matter has been considered by your City Council, please return the below ballot to my attention at the AMM office. ~OSITION: SUBURBAN ELECTED ~OFFICIAL ON THE HCCJCC Vote for Two: YES NO Fred Hanus (Minnetonka Councilmember) Dorothy Hokr (New Hope Counci!member)'" I-il., NAME OF CITY: CERTIFIED BY: Please return to: Name Title Date Vern Peterson, Executive Director Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 300 Hanover Bldg. - 480 Cedar Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 August 31, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp Tree Inspector Rebates for Diseased Trees The following people have removal of diseased trees on their property in full compliance with City and State Laws. Please submit this list to Council. Respectfully, Chris Bollis Tree Inspector CB/jcn enc: CITY OF ~O,~fO '. MOUND, MI~'~IESOTA Au9ust 31, 1979 N~'~ ADD~S NO. OF T~ TOTAL DBH D~ Mel Shons 21h9 Noble 1 ~" $66.00 Sco[[ Bi s chke h~ 7 Brunswi ck 2 37" $7h. O0 Bob Burle[~ 2066 Commerce Blvd. 2 -Ben ~a~don ~hhl B~r[le[[ Blvd. g 6[" $12g.00 ~ick BrTce ~lh3 Devon Lane ' 1 26" $~2.00 Richard Beard 2610 Gran~er Lane 2 J~ck Hibbard 1706 Shore~ood Ln. .. 1 Ro~er Sh,y ~hh5 Spruce " ~ 6h" $128.00 ~drian Meuwisse~ 6170 Red Oak Rd. 1' 36" $72.00 Sandr~ Merwin 5749 Sunset 2 30" $60.00 David Grommersc~ ~hl Church Rd. 2 ~8" $116.00 Howard J ~ cobs en 5078 Shorel i ne 1 Lydia ~ueger ~777 Sunse[ 1 B2" Bruce Dodds 3021 Dickens 1 ~h" $68.00 TOI'AL $'i-~ ~ $1,o3 .oo ,gl27 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 5, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp Tree Inspector Rebates for Diseased Trees The following people have removal of diseased trees on their property in full compliance with City and State Laws. Please submit this list to Council. Respectfully, Chris Bollis Tree Inspector CB/jcn enc: CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MlqlR~ ES OTA LIST ~2 October 5, 1979 NAF£ Ben Anderson Richard Hartman Vern Nordstrom Rick Lindl~n Doug Swanson Ralph Addison Stephen Maddock William J. Kmlal Alice Hetrick Art Renni e ADDRESS 1536 E. Minnehaha Pky MDls, Mn. 55417 2640 Shannon 5850 Sunset 1720 Resth~ven 2142 Sandy Lane 6365 Acorn Rd. 5116 Edgewater Dr. 2055 Commerce Blvd. 4617 Hanover Rd. 4751 Aberdeen Rd. NO. OF TREES 9 2 4 TOTAL DBH 32" 16" 37" 74" 11" 46" 48" 84" 39" DOLLARS $64.00 $32.00 $74.00 $148.00 $84.00 $22.00 $92.00 $48. O0 $168.00 $78.OO TOTAL $810. O0 DAVID ,,J. KENNEDY LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ IIOO FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 October 1, 1979 TELEPHONE (612) 333- 0 5.43 Mr. Leonard L. Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Continental Telephone Dear Len: I am enclosing herewith a copy of a letter and a schedule of hearings from Continental. It might be wise to try to give this to the newspaper and see if you can generate any interest for the hearing on November 20. I am also enclosing a certi- ficate of service from the phone company indicating where they have published the notice. I am surprised that the Mound Laker is not on that list. You might want to qive Continental a cal~ and ask if they are going to publish in ~ound .... , .~ ~ Ve~ truly yourS, / "~,5/" ~ ~ ~urtis A. Pearsqn /" ~'~ I~' ~ / ;~ ~ t / · >-- } Enclosure %~._~ ~ / ~ .... ~?_7 ) }.. Continental Telephone of Minnesota, Inc, Suite 300 ~ Hudson Road Office Park 6053 Hudson 'Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55119 (612! 739-1530 Sept'ember 26, 1979 Curtis A. Pearson City Attorney City of Mound 1100 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 RE: In the Matter of the Petition by the COntinental Telephone Company of Minnesota,'Inc. for Authority to Change its Schedule of Telephone Rates for Customers Within the State of Minnesota. I herewith enclose and serve upon you by mail Official Notice of the schedule of public hearings to be conducted by the State of Minnesota, Office of Hearing Examiners, in the above entitled matter. Sincerely, · ' CONT~E~JTAL TELEPHONE COMP~ANY OF ~IN~ESOTA, INC. / Vice President - Pt261ic Affairs/ Admini strati ve Manager MBV: s kb enclosure OFFICIAL NOTICE IN THE MATTER OF ThE PETITION by the CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, INC., for ~uthority to change its schedule of telephone rates for cu~tomer~ within the State of Minnesota, public hearings will be convened at the times and locations listed below for the purpose of affording all customers and other concerned parties an oppor- tunity to present testimony or make statements before the Hear. lng Examiner regaYding such matters as adequacy of service, quality of service, level of rates, or other relevent matters. All hearings listed below will be presided over by GEORGE DERETICH, OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINERS, STATE OF MINNESOTA October 8, 1979 at 2:00 p.m. October 8, 1979 at 7:00 p.m. October 0, 1979 at 2:00 p.m. October 9, 1979 at 7:00 p.m. October 10, 1979 at 7:00 p.m. November 20, 1979 at 2:00 p.m. November 20, 1979 at 7:00 p,m. November 26, 1979 at 2:00 p.m. November 27, 1979 at 2:00 p.m. November 27, 1979 at 7:00 p.m. November 28, 1979 at 2:00 p.m. SCHEDULE Milaca Village Hall McGregor McGregor High School Aurora First Floor, city Hall 16W. 2nd Avenue North International Falls Library and Community Building 3rd Street and 8th Avenue Warren Old Court Room Marshall County Courthouse Mound Council Chambers City Hall 5341 Maywood Road Mapl'e Plain Maple Plain Elementary School Auditorium Lindstrom Community Center 13330 Sylvan Avenue Blooming Praira Community Building Auditorium 3rd Avenue S.E. Mountain Lake Assembly Room Senior Citizen Building Tyler I~'rnnhem CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I. MARILYN B. VOGEL, certify that on or before September 28, 1979, I caused the foregoing Notice of Schedule of Public Hearings to be delivered to the follOwing legal newspapers in accordance with PSC 516. International Falls Daily Journal Littlefork Times Rainy Lake Chronicle Cook News Herald Aurora East Range Facts Babbitt Weekly News Ely Echo Ely Mi ner Tower News Lake County Chronicle Aitkin Independent Age Askov Ameri can F1 oodwood Forum Mille Lacs Messenger Mille Lacs County Times Onami a News Benton County News, Foley The Pine Knot, Cloquet Crow Wing County Review, Brainerd Grand Rapids Herald Review Kanabec County Times, ~ora Daily Transcript, Little Falls Pine City Pioneer Duluth Herald Sherburne County Star News, Elk River St. Cloud Daily Times Kittson County Enterprise Stephen Argyle Messenger Warren Sheaf Crookston Daily Times