The URL can be used to link to this page

79-10-02 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota REVISED AGENDA CM 79-357 EM 79-358 CM 79-362 EM 79-359 ZM 79-360 CM 79-361 Mound City Council October 2, 1979 City Hall 7:30 P.M. 1. Westonka League of Women Voters Pg. 2803 2. Street Construction A. Lakewood Lane Pg. 2802 B. Other 2A. Change in Parking Area Pg. 2805-2808 3. Comments and Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) 6..1980 Budget Pg'. 2792-2793 7. Transfer of Funds 8. Payment of Bills 9. Infozmation Memorandums/Misc. 10. Committee Reports Logis Joint Agreement Pg. 2795-2801 Public Hearing Date - Vacation of Part of Kildare Road Pg. 2761-2791 Pg. 2794 Page 2804 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 October 2, 1979 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: City of Mound 1979 Street Improvements Change Order No. 5 Dear Mr. Kopp: Enclosed for signatures are three (3) copies of Change Order No. 5 for the 1979 Street Improvements. This is for Cumberland Lane. If these are satisfactory, please keep one copy and return two to me. Very truly yours, McCOb~S-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. LS:sc Enclosure Minneapolis- Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls Change Order No. 5 Cumberland Lane Mound, Minnesota Co,non Excavation 8" Sewer 0 - 8' Depth 8 - 10' Depth 10 - 12' Depth Sewer Services 12' or less 12' or greater Wyes and Tees (8" x 6") Manholes Manholes, Extra Depth Adjust Manhole 3" Forcemain (P.V.C.) 6" Watermain Fittings 6" Gate Valve Water Service Groups Copper Service Pipe Hydrants 3-1/2" M.H.D. 2331 Base Course 1-1/2" M.H.D. 2341 Wear Course Concrete Curb & Gutter 12" RCP Class V Storm Sewer 0 - 8' Depth 8 - 10' Depth 1425 C.Y. @ 130 L.F. @ 135 L.F. @ 70 L.F. @ 80 L.F. @ 10 L.F. @ 6 EACH @ 3 EACH @ .5 L.F. @ 1 EACH @ 110 L.F. @ 555 L.F. @ 200 LB @ 3 EACH @ 8 EACH @ 210 L.F. @ 1 EACH @ 300 TON @ 125 TON @ 1080 L.F. @ 350 L.F. @ 15 L.F. @ $ 3.80/CY 19.25/LF 19.25/LF 20.15/LF 9.35/LF 14.30/LF 38.50/EA 935.00/EA 61.00/LF 135.00/EA 9.35/LF 13.20/LF 2.20/LB 319.00/EA 88.O0/EA 6.60/LF 715.00/EA 17.10/TN 18.85/TN 5.67/LF 14.30/LF 16.50/LF $ 5,415.00 2,502.50 2,598.75 1,410.50 748.00 143.00 231.00 2,805.00 30.50 135.00 1,028.50 7,326.00 440.00 957.00 704.00 1,386.00 715.00 5,130.00 2,356.25 6,123.60 5,005.00 247.50 Catch Basins or Manholes Type A Type B Type C Casting Assemblies R-1642-B R-3250-A Mobilization Total Change Order No. 5 2 EACH @ 3 EACH @ 1 EACH @ 4 EACH @ 2 EACH @ $803.00/EA 561.00/EA 292.00/EA 121. O0/EA 204.00/EA 1,606. O0 1,683. O0 292.00 484.00 408.00 1,500.00 $53,411.10 Original Contract Amount Change Order No. 1 Change Order No. 2 Change Order No. 3 Change Order No. 4 Change Order No. 5 Revised Contract Amount $2,236,517.65 $ 3,172.00 $ 28,547.55 $ 13,212.00 $ 53,411.10 $2,334,860.30 APPROVED: - HARDRIVES, Date: APPROVED: RECOMMENDED: ,.7 Mcc~NuTso~ ~-S-~-C~, Date: _ /0/2/ 77 INC. CITY OF MOUND, ~YOR Date: 10-2~79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 2, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-363 SUBJECT: Request for On Sale Beer License James Brugger DBA Branty's has made application for an On-Sale Beer License. The request will require a public hearing. It is recommended that the date of the public hearing be set for November 6th. Leohard L. Kopp ~ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR NOT TO LEVY FOR SEWER AND WATER BONDS FOR THE YEAR 1980 WHEREAS, there is a Res61ution No. 64-279 with the Hennepin County Auditor directing a levy of $13,000 for Sewer and Water Bonds for 1980, and WHEREAS, it appears that there will be sufficient funds to cover Sewer and Water Assessment Bonds and Interest due in 1980, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the Hennepin County Auditor be directed not to make the levy of $13,000 for 1980. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota AGENDA CM 79-357 CM 79-358 CM 79-359 CM 79-360 CM 79-361 Mound City Council October 2, 1979 City Hall 7:30 P.M. 2o 4. 5. 6. ~ 1980 Budget Pg'. 2792-2793 7. Transfer of Funds 8. Payment of Bills 9. Information Memorandums/Misc. 10. Committee Reports Westonka League of Women Voters Pg. 2803 Street Construction A. Lakewood Lane Pg. 2802 B. Other Comments and Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) Logis Joint Agreement Pg. 2795-2801 Public Hearing Date - Vacation of Part of~Kildare Road Pg. 2794 Pg. 2761-2791 Page 2804 11 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL September 11, 1979 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota was held at 5341Maywood Road in said City on September 11, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. Those present were: Mayor Tim Lovaasen, Councilmembers Gordon Swenson, Benjamin Withhart, Robert Polston and Donald Ulrick. Also present were City Attorney Curtis A. Pearson, Assistant City Engineer Lyle Swanson and City Clerk Mary H. Marske. PUBLIC HEARINGS Industrial Revenue Bonds The City Clerk presented an affidav~t of publication in the official newspaper of the notice of public hearing on said industrial revenue bonds. Said affidavit was then examined, approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened the public hearing for input on said industrial revenue bonds and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. The following person offered comment or question: Frank Livingston, 5251 Bartlett Boulevard The Mayor then closed the public hearing. Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-367 RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BY ORVILLE H. HUSEBY UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTH- ORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR APPROVAL THEREOF AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONN- ECTION WITH THE PROJECT. The City Clerk presented an affidavit of publication in the official newspaper of the notice of public hearing on said C.B.D. assessments. Said affidavit was then examined, approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened the public hearing for input on said C.B.D. assessments and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. The following persons offered comments or questions: Williard Hillier, 1551 Canary The Mayor then closed the public hearing. Wi~hhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTIOH 79-368 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR C.B.D. PARKING MAINTENANCE AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY TO SPREAD THE LEVY FOR ONE YEAR AT 8% INTEREST. The vote was unanimously in favor. September 11, 1979 Bartlett Boulevard Assessment - Storm Drain The City Clerk presented an affidavit of publication in the official newspaper of the notice of public hearing on said public improvement. Said affidavit was then examined, approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened the public hearing for input on said public improvements and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. The following persons offered comments or questions: Steve Codden, Mound resident Jim Scruton, 5267 Bartlett Boulevard Frank Livingston, 5251 Bartlett Boulevard The Mayor then closed the public hearing. Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-369 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY TO SPREAD THE LEVY FOR FIFTEEN YEARS AT 8% INTEREST. The vote was unanimously in favor. Sidewalk Replacement As§essment The City Clerk presented an affidavit of public hearing in the official newspaper of the notice of public hearing on said sidewalk replacement assessment. Said affidavit was then examined, approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened the public heaffing for input on said sidewalk replacement assessment and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views'thereon. The following persons offered comments or questions. Barbara Anderson, 2067 Commerce Jerry Laube, 3207 Oevon The Mayor then closed the public hearing. Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion to continue this hearing until September 18, 1979. The vote was'unanimously in favor. Tuxedo Boulevard The City Clerk presented an affidavit of publication in the official newspaper of the notice of public hearing on said public improvements. Said affidavit was examined, approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened the public hearing for input on said public improvements and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. The following persons offered comments or questions: Ron Fitzen, 4535 Tuxedo Boulevard Clinton Asche, Wayzata Don Jerdee, 2521 Lakewood Lane Ron Gehring, 3215 Charles The Mayor then closed the public hearing. Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-370 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR TUXEDO BOULEVARD AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY TO SPREAD THE LEVY FOR FIFTEEN YEARS AT 8% INTEREST. L The vote was unanimously in favor. September 11, 1979 115 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS Subdivision of Land - Lots 1-5, Block 1, Lots 1-6, Block 10 Pembroke Lots~4 & Part of 5, Block 14, Avalon Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-371 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO GRANT THE SUB- DIVISION AS REQUESTED The vote was unanimously in favor. Vacation of Cumberland Road - Stratford to Tuxedo Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-372 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A'PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE VACATION OF CUMBERLAND ROAD FROM STRATFORD TO TUXEDO TO BE HEARD ON OCTOBER 9, i1979 AT 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor.' Subdivision of Land - Lots 52 & 53, Phelps Island Park First Division Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-373 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND AS REQUESTED. The vote was unanimously in favor. Special Use Permit - Lots 1, 2 & W.½ of 3, Block 9, Mound Bay Park Polston moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-374 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO BE HEARD ON OCTOBER 9, 1979 AT 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Subdivision of Land - Part of Lot 46, A.S. 170 Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-375 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE SUBDIVISION AS REQUESTED. The vote was unanimously in favor. Non-conforming Use and Side Yard Variance - Lot 28 & Part of 27, Block 26, Wychwood Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-376 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMHISSION TO APPROVE THE NON-CONFORMING USE AS REQUESTED The vote was unanimously in favor. Subdivision of Land - Lot 7, 8 and W. 40 ft of Lot 6, Block 24, Seton' Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-377 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE SUBDIVISION AS REQUESTED The vote was unanimously in favor. September 11, 1979 Non-ConForming Use -Undersized Lot - Street Front Variance Lot 9, Bl~ck 11, Shadywood Point Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion r RESOLUTION 79-378 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE NON-CONFORMING USE AS REQUESTED The vote Was unanimously in favor. Non-Conforming Use - Sideyard Variance'-"Pa~t of'Lot 1; lst'Rear~, o~'Ph~l~ I~t':Div Ulrick moved and Withhart seconded a motion to deny the requested non-conforming use. Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion to table this item. was four in favor with Lovaasen voting nay. Sign Variance - Commerce.& Alder '" ' ~' :! .: '~' The vote Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-379 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE SIGN VARIANCE AS REQUESTED. The vote was three in favor with Polston and Withhart voting nay. Side Yard Variance - Possible Appeal - Lots 19 & 20, Block 17, Arden Withhart moved and Ulrick seconded a motion to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commision to deny the variance requested. Roll call vote was two in favor with Ulrick, Poslton and Lovaasen voting nay. Motion failed. Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion to approve a 3 foot side yard variance. Roll call vote was two in favor with Withhart, Ulrick and Lovaasen voting nay. Motion failed. Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a motion to table the item. The vote was four in favor with Swenson voting nay. Non-Con'forming Use - Side Yard Variance - Lot 12 & 13, Block 15, Shadywood Point Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-380 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A NON-CONFORMING USE Ag REQUESTED The vote was unanimously in favor. Non-Conforming Use - Sideyard & Front Yard Variance - Lots 10 & 11, Block 14, Seton Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-381 RESOLUTION PRO'IDliNG FOR'A'PUBLIC'HEARING REGARDING THE.VACATION .OF RIGHT"OF WAY TO BE HEARD ON OCTOBER 16, 1979 AT 7~30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion to table the variance request at this time. The vote was unanimously in favor. Sign Variance - Lots 1,2,3 & 4, Block 3, Shirley Hills Unit F Lovaasen moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-382 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO GRANT THE SIGN VARIANCE The vote was three in favor with Polston and Withhart voting nay. Il7 september 11, 1979 Garage Location Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-383 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAFT AN ORDINANCE AHENDING SECTION 26.06 SUBSECTION OF THE CITY CODE The vote was unanimously in favor. STREET CONSTRUCTION Retainin~ Wall - 3029 Drury Lane Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-384 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF TO CITY ENGINEER TO CONSTRUCT THE RETAINING WALL AT 3029 DRURY LANE The vote was unanimously in favor. Retaining Wall - Heron & Three Points Boulevard Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-385 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF TO CITY ENGINEER NOT TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL ON HERON & THREE POINTS BOULEVARD The vote was unanimously in favor. Retaining Wall - Sparrow Road Lovaasen moved and l¢ithhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-386 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY ENGINEER TO CONSTRUCT THE RETAINING WALL ON SPARROW ROAD TO PRESERVE A LARGE MAPLE TREE The vote was unanimously in favor. Retaining Wall - Cumberland Road Lovaasen moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-387 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY ENGINEER TO CONSTRUCT A RETAINING WALL ON CUMBERLAND RAOD The vote was unanimously in favor. Kildare Road Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-388 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY ENGINEER TO DELETE KILDARE ROAD FROM' THE 1979 STREET PROJECT BY MEANS OF CHANGE ORDER The vote was unanimously in favor. Driveway Entrance The Council advised the City Engineer that the policy regarding driveway entrances shall be applied in this instance. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT Connie Meyer, ~731. Carlow Road asked about the completion date of the 1978 project. Polston moved and Swen~on-seconded~a motion to waive the adjournment time and com- plete the agenda. The vote was unanimously in favor. ot '/ 7 118 September 11, 1979 TAX FORFEIT LAND - LOT 5, BLOCK 7, PEMBROKE Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-389 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER REQUEST THE RELEASE OF LOT 5, BLOCK 7, PEMBROKE FROM THE STATE The vote was unanimously in favor. STREET CONSTRUCTION - ISLAND VIEW DRIVE The Council determined to take no action at this time and request the engineer to proceed as specified by plan. RADNOR ROAD EASEMENT Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-390 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TO PURCHASE LOT 4,5,26 & 27, BLOCK 12, AVALON FROM THE STATE TO BE USED IN AN EASEMENT TRADE The vote was unanimously in favor. Withhadt moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-391 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING"THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TO RETURN THE EAST 25 FEET OF LOT 5 & 26, BLOCK 12 AVALON TO THE STATE 'The vote was unanimously in favor. CHANGE ORDER #3 Polston moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-392 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER · TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER #3 WITH HARDRIVES IN THE AMOUNT OF $13,212.O0 The vote was unanimously in favor. 1978 STREET CONSTRUCTION Swenson moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-393 RESOLUTION TERMINATING THE 1978 STREET CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH THOMAS AND SONS, INC. The vote was unanimously in favor. The Mayor asked the Council if they wished to reduce the retainage. The Council concensus was to take no action. ' ' BIKE HIKE PATHS Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion advising the engineer to continue to' monitor the activities of the County in regard to bike hike paths in the city. TAX FORFEIT LAND - LOT 26, BLOCK 11, WYCHWOOD Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-394 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ADMINISTRATION TO AUTHORIZE THE RESALE AND PURCHASE BY THE CITY AT PRIVATE SALE The vote was unanimously in favor. GAMBLING LICENSE - VFW Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-395 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A GAMBLING LICENSE FOR THE V.F.W. AND CANCELLING THE PUBLIC HEARING AS CALLED FOR IN RESOLUTION 79-358 SINCE IT IS NOT NEC~SSAf;Y 119 September 11, 1979 DINNER DANCE PERMIT Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-396 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A DINNER DANCE PERMIT TO THE SURFSIDE, INC. FROM JULY 1, 1979 TO JUNE 30, 1980. The vote was unanimously in favor. DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS Potston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-397- RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS TO BE HEARD ON OCTOBER 9,.1979 AT 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. CERTIFICATION OF UNPAID SEWER AND WATER BILLS Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-398 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER BILLS TO THE COUNTY TO BE LEVIiED ON THE 1980 TAX STATEMENTS The vote was unanimously in favor. PAYMENT OF BILLS Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion to approve payment of the bills as presented on the prelist in the amount of $695,701.03 Where funds are available. Roll call vote was unanimously in favor. COMMUNITY CENTER NAHE Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-399 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE NAMING OF THE "OLD DEPOT" BUILDING TO BE KNOWN AS "MOUND DEPOT COMMUNITY CENTER" The vote was unanimously in favor. ~ VANGUARDS .4~ot o~~ -~lt--~-6-~a~¥ ~oved and Swenson seco6ded a./~ot' r q t' g the Mayor to direct a I S letter to the Vanguards expressing the Council's appreciation. The vote was unanimously in favor. Councilmember Swenson requested additional information regarding sergeants pay and juvenile officer uniform allowance. 1980 BUDGET Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion to set a workshop meeting on the 1980 Budget to be held at 7:30 on September 17, 1979. The vote was unanimously in favor. ADJOURNMENT Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion to adjourn to the next regular meeting on September 18, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. The vote was unanimously in favor, so adjourned. Mary H. Marske CMC, City Clerk]Treasurer Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL September 18, 1979 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeti.ngt'of'theCity Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota was held at 5341Maywood Road in said City on September 18, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. Those present were: Mayor Tim kovaaen, Gordon Swenson, Robert Polston, Donald Ulrick and Benjamin Withhart. Also present were City Manager Leonard L. Kopp City Engineer Wm. McCombs and City Clerk Mary H. Marske. MINUTES The minutes of the meeting of August 14, 1979 were presented for consideration. W~thhart moved and Polston seconded a motion to approve the minutes of khe meeting of August 14, 1979 as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. The minutes of the meeting of August 28, 1979 were presented for consideration. Poslton moved and Withhart seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the meeting of August 28, 1979 with a correction on page 112 adding after PAYMENT OF BILLS Councilmember Swenson voted no because of the $100 payment to Steve Grand for uniform allowance for one month service as a juvenile officer. The vote was unanimou§y in favor. PUBLIC HEARINGS Sidewalk Assessment The Mayor reopened the public hegring and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. No persons presented objections and the Mayor then closed the public hearing. Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-400 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SIDEWALK ASSESSMENT ROLL AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY TO SPREAD THE LEVY FOR FIFTEEN YEARS AT 8% INTEREST. The vote was unanimously in favor. 1978 Street Assessment The City Clerk presented an affidavit of publication in the official newspaper of the notice of public hea~ing on said public improvements. Said affidavit was then examined, approved and ordered filed'in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened the public hearing on said public improvements and persons present to do 5o were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. The following persons offered comments or questions: Jeff Michael, 1713 Avocet Doug Trash, 4569 Spring Park - representing Bethel U.M.C. Louis Oberdeck, 2717 Clare Lane George Sigafoos, 5978 Bartlett Boulevard. Harold Kutzner, 4644 Carlow Road C. Kopplin, 2132 Overland Road Kenneth kund, 17OO Shorewood Phillip Weiland, 5544 Spruce Road Kermit Sherman, 5065 Wren Road Mathilda Hamann, 4701 Essex Lane George Millford, 2259 Langdon Lane Lawrence Baker, 1680 Bluebird Dan Campbell, 4512 Montgomery Road Charles Howe, 4730 Cavan Road Craig Follet, 5441 Breezy Road Melvin Gimmestad, 5514 Spruce Road Ed Behmler, 2130 Noble Lane ArnnlH M~vmr ~67 F~rnr~n L September 18, 1979 Allen Maron, 6155 Evergreen Doris Macias, 2248 Langdon Lane J. F. Kelley, 5508 Breezy Road Mrs. Jeff Michael, 1713 Avocet Mrs. Wilford Hansdn, 5510 Spruce Road C. W. Bergman, 6017 Beachwood Vernon Crane, 2168 Cedar Larry Vensel, 1657 Dove Fritz Cooper, 2137 Noble Lane Wayne Storien, 1595 Dove Willard Hillier, 1551 Canary The Mayor then closed the public heating. Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion to continue the hearing until September 25, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. The vote was unanimously in favor. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS Side Yard Setback, Lot 19 & 20, Block 15, Avalon Polston moved and Withhbrt seconded a motion to bring this matter'back to the table. The vote was unanimously in favor. Ulrick moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-401 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO DENY THE SIDEYARD SETBACK AS REQUESTED The vote was unanimously in favor. Side Yard Variance - Part of Lot 1, Phelps Island 1st Division Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion to bring this matter back to the table. The vote was unanimously in favor. Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion to grant the variance but maintaining a two foot distance from the lot line. Lovaasen moved and Swenson seconded a subsitute motion RESOLUTION 79-402. RESOLUTION GRANTING A SIDE YARD VARIANCE OF 2.4 FEET The vote was unanimously in favor. STREET CONSTRUCTION ~980 Streets Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-403 RESOLUTION ORDERING A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR 1980 STREET PROJECTS AND M.S.A. STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND EXPLORE FUNDING POSSIBILITIES The vote was unanimously in favor. Bike Hike Paths The Council determined to take no action on this matter at this time. The Council requested a letter be directed to Ron Harnack of the Department of Natural Resources regarding the Black Lake Fishing Bridge. SINCLAIR COURT SUBDIVISION Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-404 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 77-444 AND RESOLUTION 78-340 INCREASING AMOUNT AND BOND TO BE PROVIDED TO $62,000 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR SINCLAIR COURT SUBDIVISIONS. The vote was unanimously in favor. Sel~tember 18, 1979 ":': COMMENTS AND. SUGbE.STIONS FROM. CITIZENS PRESENT No comments or suggest, ions were' presented at tht'~'"]='['i',~e. _ =i:] .: ]'.' · RESOLUTION 79-405' RESOLUTI!ON AUTHORIZING ffH. E:.MAYOR"AND MANAGER TO REQUEST THE COUNTY TO. SE.LL TI:lIS UNDERSIZED LOT , TO'THE CITY AT'A PRIVATE:':.'SALE 'So IT CAN BE RESOLD The vote was unanimously in'favor. "~':' Lovaasen moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTI ON 79-406 RESO[UTI ON REAPPO I NTI NG~"'{;ouNc i LMEMB ER POLSTON TO REPRESENT 'THE CITY OF Mc~'UND'ON THE L.M.C.D. FOR A THREE YEAR TERM The vote was unanimously in favor. :'" PURCHASE OF SEWER EQUIPMENT ,:.:..~ ..... Ulrick moved and Withhart seconded a motion C~-' - ' RESOLUTION 79-407 RESOLUTION AUTHORI. ZING ,THE PURCHASE OF SEWER HOSE AND WAIVI'NG THE REQUIREbiENT TO ~O OUT FOR BID Si~CE THERE IS ONLY ONE SUPPE.IER. The vote was un:~nimously in favor. '..'~.., PAYMENT OF BILLS "'...- Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion to'.?pprove payment of the bills as presented on the prelist in the amount of SJ~',937~45'.w~ere funds are av~il- able. Ro11:6al.! vote was unanimously in favor..." TAX FORFEIT LAND EASEMENT - LOTS 19 & 44,:BLOCK 3, LAKESIDE PARK, A.L. C. 1st DI'V Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion .~. ~ ~ RESOLUTION 79~408 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING .THE MAYOR AND MANAGEk ~O REQUEST ~_ -.- : '-' · THE LAND'N£CESSARY FOR A PERPETUAL EASEMENT'FOR STORM SEWER PURPOSES. The vote was unanimously in favor. H.U.D. GRANT COMMITTEE Withhart moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-409 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CERTAIN CHANGES IN THE POLICY OF DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY TO A FIRST COME FIRST ' SERVE BASIS ON THE GRANTING OF H.U.D. REDEVELOPMENT GRANTS TO LOCAL RECIPIENTS. The vote was unanimously in favor. The Council determined to meet for a discussion session on the Water/Sewer Rate Study on November 19, 1979. Other items discussed included sergeants labor agreement and Planning Commission appointments. ADJOURNMENT Swenson moved and Polston seconded a :motion to adjourn to the next regular meeting on September 25, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. The vote was unanimously in favor, so adjourned. Mary H. Marske CHC, City Clerk/Treasurer REGULAR MEETING. OF THE CITY COUNCIL September ~5, 1979 Pursuant to due call and notice the?eof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepln County, Minnesota was held at 5341Maywood Road in said City on September 25, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. .Those present were: Mayor Tim Lovaasen, Councilmembers Gordon Swenson and Ben- jamin Withhart. Absent and excused were: Councilmembers Robert Polston and Donald Ulrick. Also present were: .City Manager Leonard L. Kopp, City Attorney Curtis A. Pearson, Assistant City Engineer John Cameron and Acting City Clerk Marjorie Stutsman. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1978 Street Assessment The Mayor reopened the public hearing and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. No ~ersons presented objections and the Mayor then closed the public hearing.· Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-410 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1978 STREET ASSESSMENTS (AS AMENDED) AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY TO SPREAD THE LEVY FOR FIFTEEN YEARS AT 8% INTEREST The vote was unanimouSly in favor. Special Use - Water Conditioning on Lot 30, Auditor's Subdivision 167 The Acting City Clerk presented an affidavit of publication in the official news- paper of the notice of public hearing on said special use permit application. Said affidavit was then examined, approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayo~ then opened the public hearing fo ut on said Special Use Permit and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. No persons were present regarding said Special Use Permit, The Mayor then closed the public hearing. Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion to table this special use permit hearing. The vote was unanimously in favor. Special Use Permit. for Sto.rage of Antique Cars and Tractors on Part of Lot 26, Lafayette Park, Lake Minnetonka The Acting City Clerk presented an affidavi~ of publication in the official news- paper of the notice of public hearing on said special use permit application. Said affidavit was then examined, approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened the public hearing for(~put on said Special Use Permit and persons present to do so were afforded ank~bpportunity to express their views September 25, 1979 thereon. No persons were present regarding said Special Use Permit. then closed the public hearing. Swenson:moved and Withhart seconded a motion to table this item. The vote was unanimously in favor. The Ha¥or STREET. CONSTRUCTION Discussed easement for Inverness Cul-de-sac. The Council directed the Staff to work out-details on getting easement. Special Use Permit for StOrage of Antique Cars and Tractors on Part of Lot 26~ Lafayette Park, Lake Minnetonka ' Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion to take off the table. was unanimously in favor. . Swenson moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-411 The vote The vote was unanimously in favor. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT Jeannette Gellman aSked about the new building on east side of'Lake Langdon~ if this hadn't been City land and been filled by the City. Assessments on State Owned Land ~ Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-412 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ASSESSMENTS AS SHO~]N ON COUNCIL MEMORANDUM 79-349 TO BE PLACED ON STATE OWNED LAND, The vote was unanimously in favor. Lot 13, Auditor's Subdivision 168 Withhart moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-413 RESOLUTION DIRECTING THAT LOT 13, AUDITOR~ SUBDIVISION 168 BE MADE PART OF BEACHWOOD ROAD The vote was unanimously in favor. RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED WITH STIPULATION THAT IF BUILDING USE CHANGES, APPLI- CANT WILL HAVE TO GET PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL APPROVAL. THIS PERMIT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CON- D'ITIONS: i. BUILDING TO-BE PLACED AS SHOWN ON PLAN 2. FRENCH DRAIN & GREEN AREAS BE 'INSTALLED AS ON PLAN. 3. NO RETAIL SALES AND NO OUTSIDE STORAGE PERMITTED. 4.. BOND TO BE POSTED TO COVER BLACKTOPPING, DRAIN AND LANDSCAPING.. ' 5 PARKING AREA TO BE 32 FOOT WIDE AND LENGTH OF BUILDING September 25, 1979 PAYMENT OF. BILLS Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion to approve payment of the bills as presented on the prelist in the amount of $7,813.10 where funds are available. Roll call vote was unanimously in favor. OTHER MATTERS Discussed letter from Surfside, suspension of Mound Mortgage Revenue Bonds for housing program, Summons - Orval Eddy v. City of Mound. LAKEWOOD LANE Discussed adopting design contrary to EnQineer's advice; safety hazard.- Lovaasen moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-414 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE INTERSECTION OF LAKEWOOD LANE AND WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TO BE REVISED AS FOLLOWS: THE NORTHWEST CURB TO BE EXTENDED STRAIGHT PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKEWOOD TO INTERSECT THE SOUTHERLY CURB LINE OF WILSHIRE BOULE- VARD AND INSTALL A 30 FOOT RADIUS The vote was unanimously in favor. ASSESSMENT - INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-415 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DELETION OF THE INDIAN KNOLL MANOR ASSESSMENT FOR THE 1978 STREET PROJECT AND AMENDING 1978 STREET ASSESSMENT ROLL. The vote was unanimously in favor. Briefly discussed streets to be on 1980 street Project. The Council requested the Staff and Police Department to look at the Island Park Hall and the Old Depot Building and give a complete evaulation of their use vs. the School. ADJOURNMENT Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion to adjourn to the next regular meeting on October 2, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. The vote was unanimously in favor, so adjourned, Marjorie Stutsman, Acting City Clerk Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager 10-2-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 1, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-362 SUBJECT: Change in Parking Area Mr. Pflug has blacktopped his parking lot as specified by the Council. He is also ready to put up the fence required, but would like a change. Attached is a drawing. The fence in blue is what the Council required to screen cars parked in the area. Mr. Pflug is asking that this be changed and the fence shown in red be installed instead. -CITY of MOUND September 28, 1979 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: .City Manager, Leonard L. Kopp FROM: City 'Inspector. SUBJECT: Property of Pflug Enterprises Today Mr. Pflug is installing.his blacktop parking areas and driveways in accordance to the City C0.un~il~s requirements and stipulations. He intends to install the ~enclng as required but would like to change his fencing plan as follows (s~'.enclosed Exhibits A and B). I would like to recommend th~pri'vacy fence by no more than five feet high and be set back ten feet from the;property line at the street rather than five feet. I feel five feet ceCld impare visibility for traffic safety as there is a curve in that area of the. right-of-way. Also,'any outside stor- age on the premises would be nobica~le as well. Henry Truelsen HT/dd enc:(2) Note: new shop will have street address of 48 51 §horelineBlvd. 13-117-24 44 0016 PFbUG ./ ! CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota September 20, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-357 SUBJECT: Westonka League of Women Voters Phyllis Jessen of the Westonka League of Women Voters has asked to be on the October 2nd agenda. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota September 27, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-358 SUBJECT: Lakewood Street Construction The residents of Lakewood Lane are still concerned with the inter- section construction and have asked to be on the October 2nd agenda. ~" Leonard L. Kopt3 10-2-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota September 28,, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-359 SUBJECT: Logis Joint Agreement Attached is a copy of a letter and a proposed agreement fror the City to enter into in regard to the LOGIS (computer) operation. This will be listed on the October 2nd agenda. INfOrMATION ,~YSTE MS &SSOCfATION 6820E Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55430, (612) 566-0050 September 20, 1979 MEMORANDUM TO: LOGIS BODMEMBERS FROM: T.L. Willard SUBJECT: HP Computer System Financing Documentation Background LOGIS is planning to buy the HP-3000 computer system, required ancillary equipment, and license the necessary software when the contracting firm, Optimum Systems, Incorporated, of Santa Clara, California, has demon- strated conformance to the contract requirements (the Project). The financing plan involves creation of a private, non-profit corporation (Minnesota Municipal Leasing Corporation - ~fiv[LC), issuance of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds by the City of Brooklyn Center, with bond proceeds flowing to ~C, payment of the "Project" costs by M}~C, and leasing of the "Project" to LOGIS for five years, after which LOGIS may buy the equipment, ttowever, NMLC must return the proceeds of such a purchase to LOGIS members. The chain of documentation for the IDR's requires certain contract assignments to be accomplished, as well as a resolution to be adopted by each LOGIS member agreeing to abide by OSI's requirements for the protection of its trade secrets. In essence, the resolution promises that tile City will not release any OSI programs or documentation to anyone not a member of LOGIS. Action Requ~stqd Pleas~ present the attached resolution to your governing body for authori- zation at the earliest practical date, and return two certified copies of the resolution to LOGIS. We are hoping for the bond sale to be accomplished by October 1, so would greatly appreciate your expediting the matter. TLW: b- cc: Dave Kennedy STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ) CITY OF ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting of the City of , Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a (regular) (special) meeting of the City Council held on , 19 , with the original thereof on file in my office and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to the fulfillment by the City of its obligations as a member of LOGIS under Section 4.01(a) of the certain contract, effective as of August 23, 1978, between LOGIS and OSI. WITNESS My hand as seal of the City this day of and the corporate , 1979. City City of , Minnesota (SEAL) EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COUNTY~ MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a (regular) (special) meeting of the Council of the City of in the City Hall in the City of .................... , 19 , commencing at The following members were present: , Minnesota, was duly held .... ~ on ...... ~ o~clock .m. and the following were absent: COL, ncilmember resolution and moved its adoption: then introduced the following RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of member of Local Government Information , Minnesota, is a Systems (LOGIS), a joint powers organization of local Minnesota government units formed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59; WHEREAS, LOGIS has entered into an agreement with Optimum Systems Incorporated (OSI), a California corporation, effective as of August 23, 1978, and entitled "Local Government Management Information System Agreement, Contract No. 2027" (hereinafter referred to as the "contract"), whereunder LOGIS contracted to purchase from OSI certain items of computer hardware and software which, if accepted by LOGIS under the contract, will be employed by LOGIS for the benefit of its members, including the City of , in providing economical data processing services to the members of LOGIS.. WHEREAS, under the terms of the contract, particularly Section 4.01(a) thereof, each member of LOGIS is required to execute a written statement, to be effective upon acceptance of the property under the contract, which runs in favor of both LOGIS and OSl and which embodies the terms and conditions of Paragraphs 4.01(c) thru 4.01(h) of the contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF , MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. (4.0i(c)) The City acknowledges and agrees throughout the duration of the contract that, as be'tween OSI and LOGIS, title and full ownership rights to the GEMUNIS/3000 System and all components thereof delivered to it remain with OSI. The City further acknowledges and agrees that the GEMUNtS/3000 System and all components thereof, inclusive of'the ideas and expressions therein contained, are valuable trade secrets and proprietary information of OSI, whether or not any portion thereof is or may be validly copyrighted or patented. The City covenants that it will not make use of the GEMUNIS/3000 System, directly or indirectly, for the benefit of any party which is not a member of LOGIS, or which has not executed a written statement satisfactory to OS! under the contract embodying the substance of the covenants hereof as required by Section 4.01(a) of the contract. 2. (4.01(d)) The GEMUNIS/3000 System and all information related thereto, in whatever form imparted to LOGIS or the City by OSI in connection with OSl's performance under the contract~ will be deemed confidential and proprietary to OSI, will be held in trust and confidence by the City, and will be safeguarded by the City to the same extent that the City safeguards its proprietary material, which in no reasonably prudent governmental circumstances. To those ends, the event will be less than that which a unit would exercise under similar City agrees to take reasonable steps necessary to ensure that the GEMUNIS/3000 System and all information related thereto are not made available by the City or by any of its agents, servants, and employees to any other person, firm, or entity, except as permitted by the contract. The City further agrees to take reasonable steps necessary to ensure that all those above-named individuals having access to the GEMUNIS/3000 System will observe and perform the obligations hereby undertaken by the City. 3. (4.01(e)) LOGIS may modify any computer program comprising the GEMUNIS/3000 System. All such modifications will be deemed an amendment to the license granted by the contract and subject to all of the terms and conditions of said license, and, only for the purposes of such license, those modifications will be deemed a part of the GEMUNIS/3000 System as defined in the contract. 4. (4.01(f)) The City will reproduce and include OSl's copyright notic-~ wherever it appears on copies, in whole or in part', in any form~ including partial copies and modificaitons, of the computer programs and other materials comprising the GEMUNIS/3000 System, inclusive of, but not limited to, documents and the manuals delivered under' the contract. 5. (4.01(g)) To the extent that the City modifies any document or manual delivered to it relating to the GEMUNIS/3000 System pursuant to the 3 contract, or incorporates any information from a document or manual delivered to it pursuant to the aforementioned license into a publication originating with the City for dissemination by the City, then, and in such event, the City will first comply with the provisions of Paragraph 4.01(f) of the contract, as embodied in Paragraph 4 of this Resolution, and the City will disseminate such document only to its agents, servants,, or employees. 6. (4.01(h)) The City will indemnify and hold O$1 harmless against any losses, damages, costs, expenses, claims, or actions resulting from or arising out of any use not authorized by the license granted in the contract of the computer programs and/or materials comprising the GEMUNIS/3000 System by the City, by any agent, servant, or employee of the City, or by any other person who obtains access through the Ci'ty to the computer programs and materials licensed to the City. 7. The City makes the foregoing covenants, which run to the benefit of LOGI$ and to OSI, in fulfillment of the City's obligation under the contract, and effective as of the date provided therein. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 4 10-2-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota September 28, 1979 COUNCIL MEMO~RANDUM NO, 79-360 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR VACATION OF PART OF KILDARE ROAD A date of October 16th was set for the hearing on the proposed v~cation of a part of Kildare Road adjacent to Lots 10 and 11, Block 14~ Seton? It is recommended that this date be changed to November 6, 1979. Leonard L. Kopp /f ~ '~eBpn~ 086I pesodo~d eq~ ~o Xdom ~ sI peqo~ ~Spn~ 086I :AD~£~aS I9E-6£ 'ON WR~N~O~B4 ~IDN/ROD 6£6I 'SE ~aq~a~das ~osau.u!~ 'puno~ GNRO~ ~0 XAID 6£-E-0,I 10-2-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota September 27, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-106 SUBJECT: County Road 110 Last Tuesday, we reported opposition to the construction of County Road 110 north. Attached are copies of the letters regarding the opposition. Leohard L. Kopp CAPITAL BUDGETING TASK FORCE A-2301 Government C~nf~r Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 September 10, 1979 Mr. Jerre A. Miller Vesely, Miller, Keefe & LaBore Suite 203 Northwestern Bank Building Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Dear Mr. Miller: Upon receipt of your letter dated August 31, 1979 regarding Project 110-7002, my immediate response was to contact Mr. Dale Ackmann, County Administrator in order that he might enlighten me as to the total circumstance involved. As a result of my written request, Mr. Ackmann wrote me a letter dated September 6, 1979, a copy of which is enclosed, which is "self explanato.ry" and in my opinion gives the entire picture as it relates to Project 110-7002. The last sentence of your letter to me states that recognition of the concerns by all the parties should be factored into the final recommendation. RR:ng Encl. cc: E, F. Robb Dale Ackmann / Ken Yager Sincerely, .' Robert Reznlck Chairman ,i)UNTY ~ploycr OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR A-2300 Gov<zrnment Center Minn( apolis, Minnesota 55487 September 6, 1979 Mr. Robert Reznick Capital Budgeting Task Forc~ c/o Craig-Hallum, Inc. 133 South'Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: .Jer.re Miller Letter on Project 110-7002 I ECEIyED SEP'i 1 1979 £l~nnlng & Programming .Secl~.,n Dear Mr, Reznick: Design concept for project 110-7002 has been influenced by inputs from the communities in the lake area. Those inputs are as follows: For many years the communities in the'Lake 'Minnetonka area have urged and supported the development of'a ring route from Mound to Trunk Highway 12 that would draw traffic off CSAH 15. This would minimize or eliminate the need for improvements to CSAH 15 immediately adjaCent to Lake Minnetonka. 2. The City of Mound has asked for the development of CSAH 110 within the City of Mound and asked that the design include bikeways, particu- larly bikeways that would provide access to the schoo.1 west of CSAH 110. 3. At a public hearing this past spring the residents abutting the project in Minnetrista called for a two-lane facility with shoulders and sepa- rated bikeways. -The foregoing demonstrates that the communities and the residents have had a high interest in the provision of bikeways, which would be partially funded by the municipalities. The provision of a two-lane roadway with shoulder construction would require the construction of drainage ditches which, along with separated bikeways, 'would require even more right-of-way than is currently contemplated. Traffic projections for this ~egment of CSAH 110 indicate a demand for four- lane facilities by the year 2000. There already exists a demand for four- lane capacity at the south end of the project. Since the City of Orono cur- rently is constructing a diagonal roadway which will be a part of the long- 'talked-about ring route, we believe there will be increased amounts of traffic on CSAH 110 in the near future. We believe the construction of anything less than a four-lane facility would be an inappropriate expenditure o.f funds. HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal oppodunity employer Mr. Robert Reznick, Re Project 110:7002 ~mber 6, 1979 .Pag.e 2 Our staff pegple who attended the m~eting referred to by Jerre Miller are at a loss to' explain Mr. Miller's understanding that they in any way i~dicated a two-lane facility would be appropriate at that location. The City Council'of Minnetrista has r~ferred the f]na'l plans to Ch'eir Plan, ning Commission for a publi~ hearing. We do ~ot understand there to be any clear consensus that the project should not be built to four lanes. It is understandable that there are abutting residents who would be concerned about the width' of the construction;, however, we believe there also is an under- standing on the part of village officials as to why the project should be · constructed as proposed. If you have any further questions regarding this project, please contact'Art Lee. Dale A. Ackmann .County Administrator cp 2,, /~ugust 3!, 1979 t/ II 6.1E' · 93 FJ-"Z~ 3 ~ RE: Project 110-7002 Dear Ah-. Reznick: , . I represent a ntm~er of properly o~mers.witlKn the City of Minnetrista ~t~ aro cnncermM with and ;~uld be adver~ly eff~t~ by a pro~l by the lhmnel)in Cotmty ltighw~y ~p~'~nt to ~rove existing ~ 110 f~ Mcnmd to its intersection with CSA 151, a distm~ce of kppz~tely ~ ql~i~ is part of a pro~)s~ ~)~ty road syst~ revision in the nortln~stern l;~e M.hmetonka area that ~tes Imck to .1970 ~d ~ approv~ prel~ily by Ibc Viii.age of Mi~metrista in 1977. At a ca)until n~eting on August 20 at which time this proposal was discLksS(.~I with representatives of the ~ty high~y depar~nt, the ~cil e~t*~ss~ ('~mcen~ for the p~x)ject ~d n~v~ to refer it for.study and revi~ to its ' pl;uming cc~mtission. A~ut 1~ or rare ~esidents ap~ ~ op~sition to t h,-' l'nX~sa l. 71,: princ:il.~al rea.~n for objection is that the improvement conto~)lates a l'otu' l;t]~O higlnmy with bike trails on l~th sides M~ich wottld n~itate .ctmmidcrabh, right oF way acquisition ~d ~ssible a~uisition of one or n~re hcm~s to acuminate the ~npt~va~nt. 'l%e m.,.st intm'csting feature disclosed at the l~.~tJJ]tl W,L~ the llc~:,d to ftmd thc .iml)rox(~m'nt p,.'inc.ilxtlly frown state aid ~ces ~d~ich ,mm, t in t~n that 1.1,, i.q~vt~:~,nt hnd to Ix~ a [*OtlF l~e roa~my rather than a t:~) l:mo Ix)treks:ry. .II a t,xxo ]alit' ro:ttl;~y x~:ts l)rOlX)scd, the principal ~ce of l'~&s ~ould c~x~ f~n the rx~m~ty bullet. &70o7. I kqg~: 12 Th~, county rel.,r~s¢:ntat ives were honest ', -' en:.ugn to ndmi t that the most al}ju',Hmta~ e 'ired logical improw~ent would be a two lane roackvay if~state aid l'und.ing ~;.us not a .[actor. Ill ;my cvenl., il:.m),.,ld see~n apprc)l)ri,~te to defer ftmdtng of this l{;~tictthe Imd,~ct tn 1980 it) p(mntt the Village of Minnbtrisl:a Lo conduc; its cam study and review of ti~e p~x)I~sal. 'll~e ~mcil ~s n~)t have m~ overall th(~xmght'at'e I)l.:m and seknmnt~ com3truction of ~ch ~m i~rove~nt without pl:umin~ ~)1' this nagut'e xmuld not appe~ to be in the ~st interest of. either the Village or tim cotmty. ¥o~r r¢,o)gni.[ ion or the.se concera.~ wotktd be greatly appreciated and shoutd lurthm' ii~/'onmtiou Ix.-. desired, plea.so ].et me know. · Yours very trtcly, J:'¢d: dj b CC ' Mr. [kal Jerre 'A. Miller August 1, 1979. Mayor Jon Ehrman and Village Council City of Minnetrista 7701 County Road llO West Mound, Minnesota 55364 Gentlemen: We are. property owners along, adjacent to or in the Vicinity of County Road !10 from Mound to its intersection with County Road !51. We understand that ~he Hennepln County Highway ~p~rtment has propo~od and the Village Council is considering widening this section of road as ~art of a future plan to provide a trunk highway system throu6h our area, It is ~loc our underst.2.nd'i~ that the widening will include four lanes of traffic, a boulevard o:~ esch side so that transmission poles need not be moved and an eight foot wid~ bicycle p%th on each side on private property %o be acquired by whateve'£ means required, i~:cluding condemnatioa if .-,ecess~ry. The pl~n.,:in~ appa-rently has proceeded quite far and we have not been ~:~for,med, consulted or heard. It seems appropriate tha~, we should be in- ¥olvcd i:1 both the planning and the decision to proceed. We would like to see ~ho dgtai].s of the..planning process inc].ud~ng a detailed ~eoc~.~ '~,'~.t~on oF evidence of the problem and a list of th~ alternatives. We would like %o assure ourselves that each al'tern~tive was evaluated for technical, environ;~,ental ar.d econov~ic impgcts. We question the need. We are very concerned about the environmental and economic imp~.cts and feel that jf this pro~ct is attempted as planned we will have been denied our due We suo~r~x~ the fol]ow~.n~[ for your ~" In the light of ir,~pending long range shortages of et] .zn~] other energy resources and presidential and. federal government and possible future m.:{ndates to reduce con;n~.mpt~.on, d¢:cre~..~o* vehicu%.ar traffic, use and speed and prcr.~ote mass transit, it seens inconcrucus to us that we are proceeding wit. h .~ project that encoura~-Zes e. nd aids and abets the opposite and would co~:~u.'.,]e very larvae amounts dollars, diesel fuel, gasoline and oil in the construction Wit)', two bridges c!ose,~ in our area this sunset and increased travel on County Road 110 .there have bee,~ no ~:r;usual traffic prob]{:ns -- the existing system tends t,~ disperse the ~.raffic. Thc h~ghway depart- merit plan would concentrate traffic in M[nnetr~ota with increased danger add noise and a~r pollution for our res~.~e.~,, Mayor Jon Ehrman and Village Council Au~ust 1, 1979 Page Two For most of us our hemes represent a large share of our equity in this world. They are'part of our retirement plans, quality of life. and future financial security. The h~ghway ?lan as proposed, as we under- stand it, would destroy valuable residential property and farmland and irreplaceable trees, landscaping, buffer zones and privacy. For some of us, the cconomic and environnental impact would be very serious and wp believe there must be alternatives that would eliminate or mitigate these impacts. We have heard Confusing rumors and pieces of information about this project since about.1972. We have seen very little significant g-rowth of business or industry in Mound in the period since, and we under- st&nd that growth of student enrollment in our Mchool district is well l~].ow projections. We also believe the energy crisis and gasoline shortages will have a profound effect on future growth of population and vehicular traffic in our area. We sug¢;est that a number of years have passed since planning for the project began$ that conditions and projections h~ve changed substantially and that %he va].i,iity of ~he complete projec~ should be reassessed based on new information. Ue respectfully request your consideration and a reply to our concerns. CeCe Donald S. Sp~clnann Henneptn County Public Works ~20 Washington Avenue South Hog, ins, Minnesota Very T~ly Yours, James M. %:o!d Chief - Planning & Progra~.~ming '" ~2.0 Washlu~ton Avenue South Hopkins, Ninn~oto. .,; CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota September 28, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-107 SUBJECT: Prouty Retaining Wall Attached is a copy of a letter from the Engineer approving plans for a retaining wall on Wychwood Commons. ~-~/-L'eohard L. Kopp ' ' COMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATEs, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS Ill LAND SURVEYORS I~1 SITE PLANNERS Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 September 26, 1979 Mr. Henry Truelson Building Inspector City of Mo~:~nd 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Subject: City of Mound Prouty Retaining Wall Dear Mr. Tr.uelson: We have reviewed the plans prepared by Gardeneer Landscape Design and the letter by Schoell and Madsen Engineers approving the plan,and we Would recommend approval of the plan. Please note that the plan includes steps to the lake. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. LS:sj Enclosures #2113 Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls WILLIAM D. SCHOELL CARLISLE MADSON JAOK T. VOSLER JAMES R. ORR HAROLD E. DAHLIN LARRY L. HANSON RAYMOND J. JACKSON WILLIAM J. BREZINSKY JACK E. GILL RODNEY B. GORDON THEODORE D. KEMNA JOHN W. EMOND KENNETH E. AOOLF WILLIAM R. ENGELHARDT BRUCE C. SUNDING R. SCOTT HARRI DENNIS W. SAARI GERALD L. BACKMAN SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS (612) 938-7601 · 50 NINTH AVENUE SOUTH · HOPKINS. MINNESOTA 55343 OFFICES AT HURON, SOUTH DAKOTA AND DENTON, TEXAS September 7, 1979 ~cCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc. 3.2805 Olson Memorial Highway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 Attention: Mr. Lyle Swanson Subject: Retaining Wall for the Prouty Residence in the City of Mound, Minnesota Gentlemen: We have examined Gardeneer's drawing prepared for the Prouty Residence and titled "Retaining Wall" with revisions made as of August 27, 1979. We find that the details for the construction of the proposed retaining wall, on the aforementioned drawing, are in conformance with standard engineering practices and are typical in nature for this type of construction. Very truly yours, WREngelhardt:mkr cc: Mr. Thomas Wartman SCHOELL & MADSON, INC. P.S, Minn. Reg. 12026 71 COMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I~ LAND SURVEYORS · SITE PLANNERS {.. September 27, 1979 Mr. George Sigafoos 5978 Bartlett Boulevard ~Iound, l,~innesota 55364 Subject: 1978 Street Improvements Assessments Dear Hr. sigafoos: Your question on the assessment against your porperty and the location of your driveway was reviewed and discussed at the City Council meeting on Tuesday, September 25, 1979. When the construction plans for Grove Lane were drawn and then approved by the City Council they showed that portion of Grove Lane in front of your property to be abandoned. A cul-de-sac was to be constructed with your driveway to exit onto the cul-de-sac. ~he Council has reaffirmed that this is what they want done in this area. Enclosed is a copy of the plan showing that portion of Grove Lane. Yhe amount of your assessment was also reviewed and it was re- duced from ~2,0~5~30 to $1,379.$0 If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, ~cCOi~S-I~UTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyie Swanson, P.E. P[ound City Engineer LS:sc Enclosure cc: Leonard Kopp, City >~nager #3880 12805 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE {612) 559-3700 22 NORTH MAIN STREET, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE (612) 879-8029 SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING DIVISION, MARSHALL, MINNESOTA 56258 TELEPHONE (507) 532-5820 prh~ted on recycled paper TP'o 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (612) 473-4224 September 26, 1979 Mr. Leonard Kopp, City Manager 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Water and Sewer Rate Study Dear Leonard: Confirming you¢ letter of September 21, 1979, we will make our presentation on November 19, 1979. Copies of the report will be 'forwarded to you this week Sinc ly ere , EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES eorge W. Boyer, P.E. Vice President GWB/car DATE: 1'0: HENNEPIN 1 FROM: ] i SUBJECT: September 26, 1979 Cooperating Communi ti es i~-~~,~ <.-IV E sO~- ~ee~ing Not~ce/Thursda?, October 4, ~979 A meeting of cooperating communities has been scheduled by Hennepin County for Thursday, October 4, 1979; 1:30 p.m.; Community Room, Minnetonka City Hall, 14600 Minnetonka~Boul, ev'ard. Agenda items. Will be the review and discussion of the revised Urban Hennepin County Comprehensive Strategy and the Year VI CDBG Application,,~,schedule. Attendance at the meeting is most urgent due to the significant'"ro]e the strategy will have in program develop- ment. If you cannot attend please notify this office at 348-6418. A copy of the time schedule and the revised strategy will be mailed before the meeting- for your review. Again, the importance of attending the meeting cannot be emphasized enough. ~77~' CLAYTON L. L£F£VERE J. DENNIS O'BRI EN GLENN E, PURDUE JANES D. LARSON HERBERT P. LEF'LER NARY J. BJORKLUND TNOMA~ D. CREIGHTON LAW OFFICES L£FEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ I100 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING HINNE:APOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 September 24, ~79 Mr. Brian M. Olsen Attorney at Law Cokato, Minnesota 55321 Re: Robert D. Udell vs. City of Mound Dear Mr. Olsen: I have your letter of September 21, 1979 wherein you indicate that you represent a group of dock owners in the Emerald Lake Channel and you are concerned about the litigation commenced by Udell against the City of Mound. I am enclosing' herewith a copy of the Summons and Complaint served on the City and a copy of the City's Answer as well as a copy of my letter of May 25, 1979 to Mr. Quetlo serving upon him by mail the Answer of the City of Mound. I have had no further contact with anyone representing the plaintiff since we transmitted our Answer. There are no pending settlement negotiations and to the best of my knowledge the plaintiff has not taken any steps, to pursue the litigation. I do not know if he has filed with the court but I have not received any notice nor to the best of my knowledge has the City of Mound received notice that he has filed the action. It is my intention at this time to take no overt steps for the present time but we will continue t~o follow and. respond to any allegations or claims by the plaintiff and if nothing happens with the matter for an extended period of time we may go to the court and ask for a dis- missal or we may let the matter ride on the premise that "sleeping dogs" are best left alone. I hope this answers your questions of Septem~ber 21. Ver~ truly y.ou~.s,~ / City Attorney City of Mound CAP:ms Enclosure cc: Mr. Leonard Kopp, City Manager DOERING, RADZWILi~ OLSEN ATTORNEYS AT LAW R. EARL DOERING WILLIAM S. RADZWILL BRIAN M. OLSEN TE LEPHONE:(612) 286-2173 METRO: 473.7483 COKATO, MINNESOTA 5532! .September 21, 1979 Mr. Curtis A. Pearson Attorney at Law 1100 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Re: Robert D. Udell v. The City of Mound Dear Mr. Pearson: I would like to inquire of you at this time the status of the above captioned case initiated by Robert and Cleo Ude11 .against the City of Mound presently is. As you probably remember from our contact by telephone last spring, I represent a group of dock owners in Emerald Lake Channel who would be very much affected by any decision reached in the above captioned litigation. I would also appreciate if you could inform me of any pendi.ng settlement negotiations, or of any trial date set' in. Hennepin County. Any information you could furnish to me would be greatly appreciated by myself. Thank you very much for your assistance. Very truly yours, Brian M. Olsen DOERING, RADZWILL & OLSEN BMO/sb CLAYTON L- L£FrVERE HERBERT P. LEFLER CURTIS A PEARSON J. DENNIS O'BRIEN JOHN E. DRAWZ DAVID J. KENNEDY JOHN B. DEAN GLENN E. PURDUE JAMES D. LARSON CHARLES L. LIEFEVERE HERBERT P. LEFLE:R 'ITT JEFFREY J. STRAND JAMES P. O'NEARA NARY J. BJORKLUND THOMAS D. CREIGHTON LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ IIOO FIRST NATIONAL BAN~ BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 September 26, 1979 TELEPHONE 333-054-3 Mrs. Arlet~e M'oline :~ ' :. .. -- - 10455 Morris Road Bloomington, Minnesota 55437 Re: 1979 Mound street Improvements Dear Arlette: This will confirm our telephone conversations of today. On September 25 I was contacted by John Cameron of McCombs-Knutson who indicated that you had contacted him regarding your lot in Mound. It is my understanding that you told him that the City had put stakes on your property and that further.a fence which is on your. property had been knocked down by falling trees. After considerable discussions and apparently your ~onsultation ' with your attorney and your neighbors, we have in essence reached the following agreement: The surface stakes which are Presently located on your lot may be left there by the City until the street has been constructed. The main purpose of the stakes 'is to accurately designate the City's roadways and to assist the paving machine which will be laying the curb and gutter abutting your property. You are agreeing that those stakes may remain. You do not want any brush or trees on your lot cut and if there is any destruction of brush or trees on your property, you want the City to replace those t~ees. You.have talked to John Cameron and myself and John is to make every effort to inform the crews that they are not to trespass or to damage your property. You are not permitting any grading on your lot and you do not want any soil removed from your property. LAW OFFICES L£FEVERE, LEFLER. PEAI~SON,O'BRIEN & DRAWZ Mrs Arlette Mo line Page 2 September 26, 1979 4. The City does agree that .after the curb and gutter has been completed the City will backfill behind the curb if you request this backfill. I presume this means that you will examine the project and let John Cameron know if there is to be any backfilling done .by the City of Mound. 5. The fence which is on your property apparentlY has been . ~ damaged by trees which have been cut down across the street which have fallen across your fence. You have indicated to me that the City has permission to take the fence down so that the paving machine can. go through the area, but the City or its contractors are to replace the fence with an equal or better fence which is to include a strong wire across the top to prevent snowmobiles and other trespassing on to your property. We have agreed by telephone today that contingent upon these con- ditions the City ~may ~se its paving machine rather than hand- forming the curb in front of the property and if a small arm or attachment to the machine goes on or across your property, you will not object so long as we meet the above set forth conditions. I have .suggested that this .letter can act instead of an easement and after you have reviewed it, I would request that you return a duplicate copy to me in the enclosed., self-addressed envelope. Arlette, I want to assure you that we very much appreciate your cooperation and I am very understanding'of some of your past frustrations regarding these properties. I believe that John Cameron and I can work with you and hopefully when the project is completed you will be satis- ~ fied with the way your property has been treated and the way you as an individual property owner have been treated by representatives of the City. With sincere thanks for your consideration, I remain Very truly yours, Curtis A. Pearson City Attorney City of Mound CAP: ms cc: Mr. Leonard Kopp, ~City Manager Mr. Ralph Tully Mr. John Cameron CLAYTON L- L~:FEVERE HERBERT p. LEFLER CURTIS A. PEARSON d. DENNIS O*BRIEN JOHN E, DRAWZ DAVID J. KENNEDY JOHN B. DEAN GLIrN N Ir. PURDUE JANE5 O.LARSON CHARLES L. L~FEVERE HERBERT P. LEFLER ~ JEFFREY d. STRAND JANES P.O'MEARA HARY J. BJORKLUND THOMAS D. CREIGHTON LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ IIOO FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55402 September 26, 1979 TELEPHONE (61Z] 333- O5~,3 · Mr. Thomas J. Rooney Attorney at Law 1170 Northern Federal Building " Sixth and Wabasha St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Re: i978 Street Improvements City of Mound vs. Thomas & Sons Construction Dear Mr. Rooney: I have your letter of September 21, 1979 indicating %hat you and your clients will be demanding arbitration with the City of Mound regarding the amounts due und. er the contract with Thomas and S0ns. I have also talked with John Cameron at McCombs- Knutson and he has the easements in a separate file including the dates when they were executed by the property owners. I would suggest %hat if you wish to examine those easements you find a date and time when you and I are both available and we can go to McCombs-Knutson's office and meet with Mr. Cameron and you can then examine the documents. I am wondering if you deem it necessary to demand arbitration at this time since we don't know whether we are going to be able to agree on a final settlement' figure. I am sure you are aware that the work is being continued and completed by another con- tractor and once those costs have been determined we will be in a position to sit down with you and your clients and see if we can negotiate a final settlement. I, of course, have no control over your d. emanding arbitration, but I am wondering if it is not a bit premature. If you desire to talk about this further, please give me a call. Ver~/truly yourS, Curtis A. Pearson CAP:ms cc: Mr. John Cameron Mr. Leonard Kopp 7 73 POLICE/CRIM]~ ACTIVITY REPORT Cities o1( MOUND~ SPRING PARK, Month MINNETRISTA & ST. BONIFACIUS I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY " " THIS YEAR LAST YEAR ACTIVITY . . MONTH TO DATE' TO DATE Traffic control (citations & ~varnings) " 449 3537 4585 DWI ~ 6 . 54 · 70. Property danaage accident · 16 '197 '192 Personal injury accident 7 . 47' 86 Fatal accident 0 , 2 2 Adult f~lony & misdemeanor arrests 23 145 144 Juvenile felony & misdemeanor arrests 28 122 84 .Vledicals 16 154 163 a, nimal complaints 160 1090 ] 115' " Part I & Par~ II offenses 125 667 778 Other gen6ral investigations 711 7224 6641 TOTA 1., ] 54 ] ] 3,239 ] 3,860 ol.7 72. PROPERTY LOSS ERY SUMMARY ALL CITIES -.AUG. ITEM Bikes Boats Cloth4ng Currency,' notes, etc. rewelry & precious metals Guns Home Furnishings ~adio & Electronic equipment Vehicle's & vehicle equipment /Hscellaneous TO TA L S TO LEN 1054 500 2616 10,995 240 1232 460 8412 $ 25,509 RECOVERED 89 500 60 $ 1,916 . 77/ III. '__OFFENSE ACTI SUMMARY cITIES C0HBINED - AUG. PART I CRIMES O Adul~ ~uv. Homicide .... ., Robbery .... ~ I .... 5 . Burglary Larceny. ~7.' ., ,~ ~7 ] 8 - TOTAL -.. 66 ! ' 65 2 "6 10 :PART II CRIMES Simple Assault I 5 . I 5 3 , i. Arson i~or ge'fy- ~' C'ounte ~'-fe[.~i,n_~ 2 Fraud 3 3 1 }~n]bezzlemen[ - St~le~ ProBert~ .......... Vandalism .... 28 i , 27. ~ 1 Weapons Prostitution ~ Gommerclalized Vice 8ex Offenses , , . -- , ~arcotlc drt~g laws .... I m ---- ~--Gamhl~n~. - '~ '- ~ffenscs against fa~ilT, ~ children p[ivlng under the influence 6 & .... 6 Liquor Laxvs .... 2 2 ~ - Public Peace 11 i i 1 3 8 All other offenses TOTAL ~ ,.- . ..... '61 1 60 8 17 18 125 10 23 177o City of__ Year J979 ~OL~CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT I~0UND MOnth Auqust I. GENERAl-, ACTIVITY SUMtX{ARY THIS YEAR LAST YEAR· ACTIVITY MONTH TO DATE T° DATE Traffic control (citations & warnings) 266 2078 2372. DWI 3 30 39 Property damage accident 8 ! 02 92 . Personal injury accident 3 23 45 Fatal accident 0 0 0 Adult felony & misdemeanor arrests 15 93. 84 Juvenile felony & misde~aaeanor arrests 23 83 66 .Vledicals 13 lo3 104 ~ nimal complaints 124 813 837 Part I & Part II offenses 84 428 506 Other general investigations 459 4629 4150 TOTAL 998 8382 8,295 HOUND - AUG. n. LOSS/ ;OVERY SUMMARY ITEM ;ikes - ts g '.urrency,"notes, etc.' [ewelry& precious metals Omc Furnishings Radio & tglectronic equipment .hicles & vehicle equipment cellaneous TOTAL (for individual city} GRAND ;I'OTAL (ail cities combined} STOLEN 360 5o0 2,616 10,795 240 1,155 460 3,948 .$ 20,074 $ 25;509 RECOVERED ~;00 1,074 $ 1,827. $ 1,916 MOUND'- AUG. III. OFFENSE ACTIVITY SUMMARY PART I CRIMES ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 . o .O ' Adul~ ~uv. ~omlc~ae , Robbery ~ 1 . , .1 5 .. ~ssault , ~ 1 L~rceny , ,27 TOTAL ' PART II CRIMES Sim~le Assault ' Arson .... Forgery &. Counte%'fe[ting ] ..... I .. Fraud - ~n~b e z zl e n% e nt~ ~tolen Propert¢ . ' ....... ~' _ . y~ndalism ..... 22 .. 22 3 ..... · , 1 }¥.eapqns Prostitution & Commercialized 'Vice' Sex Offenses -- lqarc_otic drug laws .... .Gambling. ,, . Offe. nses against family_ & _chll__dren ........ Driving unde. r the Influence . Liquor Laxvs 2 2 4 ~Publ ic peace q 9 I . 2 .8 All other offenses 1 ___ 1 ~ , .3 TOTAL [2 0 42 6 9 17 TOTAL PART I & PART II CRIMES , [ 05 1 I 15 27&7