The URL can be used to link to this page

2016-12-13 CC Agenda PacketCity of Mound Claims 12-13-16 YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT 2016 111816CTYMAN $ 7,057.55 2016 2016GENELECT $ 4,397.24 2016 112916CTYMAN $ 2,035.84 2016 120216CTYMAN $ 51779.90 2016 121316CITY $ 63,666.79 2016 121316HWS $ 125,455.38 2016 NOV16UBREFND $ 799.91 2016 121316CITY2 $ 73,622.57 TOTAL CLAIMS 11 $ 282,815.18 -3053- .0 ExtoTtNO NARWWWM B'N7 Shue Street Bide M. Shod West 014e Boo 44. Bituminous Driveway 1,461 p. Cone. Peel Arms I'm Bq. Cone. Routh Bldg. Ne $4. 1 Cone. most Bldg. 10 84. 1 Cone. Entrance 187 Bq, I Deck Neer Lake OM Bq. I Decks Nest Bldg. N 6q. I Cone. Stepping Peds 128 6q. I Ret. Stills 148 8q, I TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 7,761 Bq AREA OF LOT TO dHW 21,018 Sq ERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT LEGEND e' CATCH BASIN FIRE HYDRANT 0 • POWER POLE ® . MANHOLE ® • TELEPHONE PED. B . ELEC. TRANSFORMER ® • WELL ® . GATE VALVE ' = LIGHT POLE --K —x . FENCE LINE —SS— = SANITARY SEWER LINE —W— = WATER UNE — C — = GAS UNE — ST— = STORM DRAIN UNE — E — = OVERHEAD UTILITY UNE •: .: — CONCRETE SURFACE a Lake I HDffBY COM THAT 7M NIk. SLR%Ey OR ROM yµ5 PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER NY DFM SFBtVGDt.' �-e AND THAT I AM A IX I RE051yT , mLANDww SUR4EYOR T [ : UNOFA 111E y6 OF iqE SJA7� D; Y.WNESOTA Minnetonka OHiEsur�'EYED' AUGUSTI6 2016 SHEET TITLE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY { DP,AWIPSNUMBEI SHEET NO. 00 16, 3144 Also, we are not as familiar iciaIs in this community are. r have jurisdiction over the n or planning improvements -R 68 Sq. Ft. 47 Sq. Ft. 41 Sq. Ft. 20 Sq. Ft. 00 Sq. Ft. 81 Sq. Ft. 57 Sq. Ft. 10 Sq. Ft. 16 Sq. Ft. 87 Sq. Ft. 34 Sq. Ft. 58 Sq. Ft. 33 Sq. Ft. 75 Sq. Ft. 90 Sq. Ft. 1,017 Sq. Ft. 1,018 Sq. Ft. .OT 38.1% NIAMENOBADDRESS Exist Chaln Fence --- UY to, J11 (j b toil %%L �a - -FX/St Chain Fence f r\\ Exist conc. r -Entrance �Ezlst*7_ I '\ -BitUM47 1k Appm, stOOP2 4 )cto 0� C. 177771�j2— N EA sting 4�� Dwelling Areshold at dbor 9J75--- .5 Z4 Z 5.0 7 - Roll ansbape--, ___ %_ Bouldws ()50.) � -------- eft Z4- Pa dvan e e ffilw as Im MAIERMSION AND EWQNM U Sunow .Wl7g A Engineeft, Co. 934 kr-O' Decorailve �30 —9 930 ____ Nan-scoleable S#t Fence - Alo Roll ro aosest alsting-i HIgh Water Stone Stepper 17E VEN & PA TRim miLLER Z11 " oufluarflurK, "rop of manhole 9378 Priest Lane R=_ 104"59' d 6�-Om Cedar once Prqp"eF Pdwc .y QD; 1-4 14 X -pro ased POOP, Equ47. Storage -Proposed Shower Dock '1PaWrP0o/Dvck on Area X10F R91 E X i s t I n 9 P 0 a -P�Wosed Natural fleone RetalhIng Wall Z4 Max Hf. 2.5' Ita b 940. 1 At rop of Pool 71 - ----- (932.4 At Bottom) P d -Natural Stone -Re ah7l g MWI a W f -93B ?Z91"n 0) Proposed - 5' F .7— -kax Ht. I ' I -z4— � A osed F= Proposed-, Stone Steps "Pt I IZ4 37��— ansbape--, ___ %_ Bouldws ()50.) � -------- I ce — —936— 0 -44- dvan e e ffilw as Im MAIERMSION AND EWQNM U Sunow .Wl7g A Engineeft, Co. I IZ4 37��— ansbape--, ___ %_ Bouldws ()50.) � -------- I ce — —936— 0 -44- --935- A 934 kr-O' Decorailve �i-� � —9 930 ____ Nan-scoleable ------------- ;ri;zihary HIgh Water S#t Fence - Roll -11he (929.4 Contour) lWo and the edoe of the water T I AM A DLLY UCINO CIVL STA LAWS OF �p OF MINNIM 4:�_ Minnetonka DATE SURVEYED: SHEET TITLE AUGUST 16,2016 SHEET NO. SURVEYED BY: ADVANCED SURV. PROPOSED CONDITIONS & ENGINEERING, CO. SURVEY 1 0 0i N01 -3143- F N im 01H, Pf. I RA 41 offla -All! all 1 .8 z 4; 4; t; L, t . t:t . ... ........... -0. I T_ CO M . x k'� . . . . . . . . . . lu is 1 -i14233 81.1. . J." T_ CO M . x k'� Excerpts from Mound City Code Section 129-196 Requirements applicable to all residential districts. (b) Swimming pools and hot tubs. Within any residential district, swimming pools and hot tubs shall be permitted subject to the following restrictions: (1) Swimming pools. Swimming pools having a water depth of two feet or more which are operated for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents of the principal use and their guests are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: a. Swimming pools shall be subject to the following setbacks: 1. The side yard setback is ten feet. 2. The corner lots, from the side street setback is 15 feet. 3. The rear yard setback is 15 feet. 4. Lakeshore, from the ordinary high-water line setback is 50 feet. 5. From any structure on same lot the setback is ten feet. 6. From principal building on an adjoining lot the setback is 20 feet. b. Private swimming pools are prohibited in the front portion of residential parcels. The front portion includes the area extending across the entire width of the lot and situated between the front line of the principal building and the front lot line. C. The swimming pool shall be entirely enclosed by a protective fence or other permanent structure not less than five feet nor more than six feet in height. Such protective enclosures shall be maintained by locked gates or entrances when the pool is not tended by a qualified and responsible person. (2) Hot tubs. Outdoor hot tubs shall comply with subsections (b)(1)a and b of this section with the exception that the setback from any structure on the same lot shall not apply. Furthermore, all outdoor hot tubs shall be required to either contain surrounding decking with appropriate guardrails or shall be secured by a locked cover when not in use. -3141- a SAO. -3138- CI 0 a� 122 o M GN m S� 6 _n� M U-) 00 00 c6 -3137- .- -OKINJOIA74W 5,��A F -3136- R -M MMJ MTf. feN� IIBOIKIIaIi! —� ML'RIVLT'yNN6lm Q!'JGb.11GOf RT n'C♦7I PLYIU.'93GTIlHGN4Rr cc � nAm siaA ..r rw1l Brt. Iwt zswronvam tiwB1e • Iv oG 9/ V PRGI YH SIA OIYOA IS b. ABRIALTg40bB FA }'08 BIFATBIB BATF. l9lA eM vITURBMWfi! TIBY .BIBOOR IN T�l.9YL MTE LLV 6MA2f I;'OM NIGIMAI BOLT WALL SECTION 3CYF: W - 1'-0' -3134- jLq qc 5v'i Mt��cR_AE6ra -3133- 3ldS' Yi=�tsr uU ...A1ouNr>. AAAI xr si.zoiL- - Existing Pool House 30.1x8.2 Currently Has 2 Showers, 2 Sinks, 2 Toilets and Houses Mechanicals Behind Left Double Doo Proposed: 15'x8' Pool House With One Shower, One Sink, One Toilet And Mechanicals. -3132- Left Arrow: Wall Bowing Outward Toward Home Right Arrow: Modular Blocks Settling Along Steps -3131- t4; J I �, 71:4 .r vs I i Settling Of Concrete Decking -3126- Steve & Patty Miller Nov . 19n� 3185 Priest Lane Mound, MN 55364 Date: November 1, 2016 The Millers originally purchased this property as a double lot in 1989. It included a home and a pool with a small pool building. For some unknown reason the house was located on one lot and the pool and pool building were on the adjoining lot. The Millers are now in the process of legally combining the lots to form one large lot. Paperwork was submitted to Hennepin County on October 14, 2016. A previous owner of this property installed a 20'x 40' swimming pool in 1969. Although the pool presumably met building code standards at that time the building code for pool setbacks adopted in 1982 is more limiting. The pool is now approximately 44'-7" from the OHM of Lake Minnetonka. This is 51- 5" closer than would normally be allowed for new pool construction. Over the past forty seven years of use, the pool has understandably experienced some deterioration. At this time the Millers feel it has become impractical to continually repair a forty seven year old. pool. The Millers would like to replace it, and at the same time install an auto- cover for safety. The Millers and Tabor Group Landscape explored options of relocating the pool to meet code. Unfortunately if the new pool is located farther away from the lake, it would result in a conflict with the front setback to Priest Lane along with exceeding further past the front plane of the homes foundation. Making the new pool narrower to meet setback code would make the pool less usable and eliminate the diving board, since diving would become unsafe. The simplest and least obtrusive solution is to replace the pool with one that is of the exact same size and location. The new pool will be safer since it will have an auto -cover. There are several large oak trees and other vegetation along the lakeshore, which form screening of pool activity from the lake. The pool is also higher in elevation making it even less visible. In conjunction with a new pool, we are proposing to rebuild the existing small pool building within its existing footprint, and at its present height to allow it to become a restroom/shower area. We are also proposing to replace the stone retaining walls which are cracking and opening up. Unless the wall condition is addressed, the walls will at some point allow soil to erode into the lake. New fencing will also be added to enhance safety both for the pool and the steep bank of the lakeshore. We believe these improvements to the Miller property are in accord with the intent of the building code to not encroach on the lakeshore or encroach toward Priest Lane. We also believe that the improvements will add to the safe use of the property. Thank you for your time on this matter, 9� A jju—� Jeff Gaffney -3125- P-952.220.5180 F-952.926.0392 I taborlandscape.com 1 6161 WOODDALE AVENUE EDINA MN 55424 Case No. 6. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( )), No ( ). If yes, explain: The existing pool was installed in 1969. This was significantly before the adoption of the 1982 ordinance. 7 Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances created by any other person -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (X), No ( ). If yes, explain: Assuming the existing pool was installed per code we are now faced with a more restrictive setback. 8. Are the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances for which you request an expansion permit peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? Unknown a] I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required bti law. // Owner's Applican -3124- Date %d -1 .6 Date 11, 1 . � (Q Case No. �tll 3. Please complete the following information related to the property and building's conformity with the zoning regulations for the district in which it is located including the expansion permit request. Lot 7 has a pool with a non conforming setback Lot 7 has an accessory but no primary structur(Lot 7 & 8 - paperwork has been filed w/ Hennepin Co. SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED EXPANSION (a wdstlng) Front Yard: C 7' E W) 20' ft. 12.9' ft. 12.9' ft. Side Yard: ( N 9CDV ) 10' ft. 42.5' ft. ft. Side Yard: (N S E(M 10' ft. 6.9' ft. 6.9' ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. Lakeside: ( ifm� W ) 50 ft. 44'-8" ft. 44'-8" ft. : (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Lots 7 & 8 sq ft 21,018 sq ft sq ft Hardcover: sq ft 8,017 sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( )d, No ( ). If no, specify each non -conformity: 5. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion unique to the property such as lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have no control? Please check all that apply: ()4 too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ()4 existing situation C4 too shallow ( ) shape (%4 other: specify Please describe: We are requesting to replace the existing pool with a new pool in the same location. Installing the new pool farther away from the lake at the 50' setback will constrict the front setback -3123- 17) 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 553 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 pc� EXPANSION PERMIT APPLICATION NOV _ 12016 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Case No. Att Please tune or nrintlenihly SUBJECT Address 3185 Priest Lane PROPERTY LEGAL Lot Lots 7 and 8 Block 2 DESC. Subdivision Highland Shores PID # 23-117-24-34-0081&23-117-24-34-0082 Zoning: ®i 111A R2 R3 B1 B2 B3 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name Steve and Patricia Miller Email OWNER Address 3185 Priest Lane Phone Home 612-419-7544 Work Fax APPLICANT Name Tabor Group Landscape Email _jeffg@taborlandscape.com (IF OTHER THAN Address 6161 Wooddale Avenue, Edina, MN 55424 OWNER) Phone Home Work 612-414-9595 Fax 952-926-0392 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Unknown 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Replace existing swimming pool with new pool in same location and size. Alter existing pool house within its existing footprint. Remove existing concrete pool deck and patio and install new pool deck and patio resulting in less total hardcover Remove existing retaining -3122- Case No. 1V I 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (X No (). If yes, explain: The existing pool was installed in 1969. This was significantly before the adoption of the 1982 ordinance. 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (X ), No ( ). If yes, explain: Assuming the existing pool was installed per code we are now faced with a more restrictive setback. 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? Unknown Q I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices a Owner's Applican -3121- Date G 4/ Date 11 . 1 ->, (j Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No ()0. If no, specify each non -conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): Lot 7 has a pool with a non confroming setback Lot 7 has an accessory building but no primary structure SETBACKS: REQUIRED Front Yard: (®S E W) 20' ft. Side Yard: (N SON) 10' ft. Side Yard: (N S EM 10' ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W) ft. Lakeside: ( N(ME W ) 50' ft. 6.9' (NSEW) ft. Street Frontage: ft. Lot Size: Lots 7 8 8 sq ft Hardcover: sq ft REQUESTED VARIANCE () soil (or eAsting) ( ) drainage existing situation M too shallow 12.9' ft. 12.9' ft. 42.5' 6.9' ft. 6.9' ft. 44'-8" ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. 21,018 sq ft sq ft 8,017 sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( )0, No ( ). If no, specify each non -conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? 04 too narrow ( ) topography () soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage existing situation M too shallow ( ) shape ()4 other: specify Please describe: We are requesting to replace the existing pool with a new pool in the same location. Installing the new pool farther away from the lake at the 50' setback will constrict the front setback -3120- crry o--SND-- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Plane 952.472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 VARIANCE APPLICATION Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date Case No. &4� City Council Date Please type or printlegibly SUBJECT Address 3185 Priest Lane PROPERTY LEGAL Lot Lots 7 and 8 Block 2 DESC. Highland Shores Subdivision 9 PID# 23-117-24-34-0081823-117-24-34-0082 Zoning: ®1 R1A R2 R3 B1 B2 B3(circleone) PROPERTY Name Steve and Patricia Miller Email OWNER Address 3185 Priest Lane Phone Home 612-419-7544 Work Fax APPLICANT Name Tabor Group Landscape Email jeffg@taborlandscape.com (IF OTHER Address 6161 Wooddale Avenue, Edina, MN 55424 THAN OWNER) Phone Home Work 612-414-9595 Fax 952.926.0392 Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Unknown Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Replace existing swimming pool with new pool in same location and size. Alter existing pool house within its existing footprint. Remove existing concrete pool deck and patio and install new pool deck and patio resulting in less total hardcover. Remove existing retaining walls that are failing (leaning or shoving movement) and install natural boulder outcroppiongs. -3119- 5. The replacement pool will be constructed at the 933.0 minimum construction elevation for structures which is an improved condition. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, a possible meeting date is December 13, 2016. -3118- 3. The existing lot of record is of a unique layout in that the existing house and pool are located side by side. 4. The location of the home, the layout of the site, and location of the pool and pool house are pre-existing conditions that were not created by the actions of the current owners of the property. 5. The zoning regulations require that swimming pools are enclosed by a fence and gates not less than five feet and not higher than six (6) feet which conflicts with the 3 -foot height requirement for fences within the 50 -foot lakeshore setbacks. 6. The property includes an existing at grade lakeside and pool patio area which is being replaced with the project. The replacement at -grade patio area will maintain the same setback existing patio area on the lakeside at its closest point. The property presently contains both 5 foot chain link and 6 foot privacy fence which are nonconforming to height requirements based on the existing locations. The project includes the installation of new six (6) ft. privacy fence and 5 ft. decorative, aluminum fencing which are the same height as the existing fences on the property. 8. The replacement pool house is being constructed within the footprint of the existing structure and is being expanded along the same building line to include an outdoor shower deck area. The outdoor shower deck area, does not include a roof, and is similar to an open deck, as opposed to an enclosed structure. 9. The proposed fence to be installed with the project will located at the RFPE. In recommending Staff approval of the expansion permits for the pool and at -grade patio to be constructed with the project, the following findings of fact are offered: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129-40 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The existing lot of record is of a unique layout in that the house and pool are located side by side. The current pool location, which is nonconforming, is a pre- existing condition not created by the actions of the current owners. 4. The replacement pool and at grade patio will maintain the same setbacks as the current structures. -3117- 4. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 5. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 6. Impervious surface coverage shall be less than 40% of the site. Hardcover calculations will be verified as part of building permit process. 7. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 8. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 9. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. 10. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 11. New fencing to be installed for the project shall meet the requirements contained in City Code Sec. 129-196 for swimming pools. In recommending Staff approval of the variances for the new pool house, mechanical equipment and fences to be installed, the following findings of fact are offered: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129-39 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. -3116- The use of a 6 -foot privacy fence and a proposed 5 -foot decorative, aluminum, non - scalable fence are being proposed as part of the project for the subject property. Staff and the applicant will comment further on the proposed fencing plan at the meeting. Mechanical Equipment. Per code, mechanical equipment can encroach up to 2 feet into setback areas. The applicant has indicated that the pool company has advised that the equipment for the new pool not be located in the pool house and has proposed the equipment be located immediately north of the outdoor shower area for the replacement pool house. The equipment will not be visible from the road due to 6 foot privacy fence that is proposed for the project which is shown on the survey. RFPE. All new structures must be constructed at or above the 933.0 Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. Per applicant, the new project improvements including the pool, at grade patio and new fencing will be constructed at or above the 933.0 elevation. MCWD. Applicant is advised that any site alteration activities or improvements proposed to be located below the 931.5 elevation (100 -year floodplain for the MCWD) may require floodplain permitting and requires compensation. Per applicant, all new fencing will be installed at the 933.0 elevation. Staff suggests the applicant contact the MCWD regarding proposed activities to be undertaken near the lakeshore as part of the landscaping/site improvement project. Hardcover. The proposed hardcover on the site for the project was shown on the submitted survey at 38.1 %. As an existing lot of record, the maximum hardcover for the site is 40%. Final verification of hardcover (including detailed breakdown) will occur as part of the building permit process. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends Planning Commission approval of the the expansion permits and variances for 3185 Priest Lane to the following conditions: 1. The lowest floor of all new structures shall beat the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation for Lake Minnetonka (933.0) or three feet above a wetland. 2. The at -grade deck is required to be constructed at the setback of the existing at grade patio, at its closest point. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. -3115- At Grade Patio. Expansion permit approval is required to replace the existing lakeside lakeside /pool patio area. The code requires a 50 -foot setback from the 929.4 Ordinary High Water Mark from Lake Minnetonka for patios. Per information from the applicant, the design/layout of the proposed new patio area is being modified from its current configuration but will maintain the same setback as the existing at -grade patio area on the lakeside. Staff will provide further comment on the at -grade patio at the meeting. Fence Regulations. There is an existing 5 foot chain link fence and 6 foot privacy fence on the subject property which are nonconforming. New 6 foot cedar privacy fencing is being proposed for the north and east sides of the property and new 5 foot decorative aluminum fence, to include self-closing gates, is being proposed along the east and south/lake sides of the property for the purpose of enclosing the pool and pool house structure. While some of the fence is being replaced in the same locations with similar fencing materials, there is fencing that is being installed in new locations. Staff's approach to address the new proposed fencing plan for the project is through the variance process. A. The code allows fence height up to 4 feet within the R-1 District. Variance approval is requested to allow fence height up to 6 feet within the front setback area for the purpose of enclosing/screening the pool house, pool equipment area and the swimming pool. There is an existing fence that extends from the front of the house and angles to the N/E that is being removed and replaced with a proposed new 6 foot privacy fence. The proposed new fence, while not meeting the 4 foot height requirement, will be located further back from the front property line than the current fence. Members are advised that fences beyond the 30 foot front setback to the 50 foot lakeshore setback area can be 6 feet in height. B. Sec. 129-129-203 (5) requires fences within the 50 -foot lakeshore setback to be no higher than 3 feet in height and must include transparency similar to that of chain link fence. C. Sec. 129-196(b)(1)c requires swimming pools to be enclosed by a fence of not less than 5 feet and not more than six feet to include gates. It is important to note that several fence requirements come into play for the project and conflict with one another, including those required for swimming pool enclosures and fences in shoreland areas. The zoning ordinance states that the most restrictive rules are to be applied. -3114- STAFF/CONSULTANT/AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to Staff/Consultants/Public Agencies for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and are, therefore, not included in this report. Provided below is summary of comments received: Jason Gottfried, Hennepin County Transportation Department Hennepin County staff reviewed the application materials on 11/30 and do not envision the project would impact the county system. Stewart Simon, Field Officer I do not see any issues with the proposed variance and expansion permit requests, based on the improvements to be same and/or similar to the current conditions. There is a tree line between the existing pool and the lake. Per code, a fence meeting the requirements of City Code 129-196 (b) (1) (c) is required for swimming pools. DISCUSSION • Pool. Expansion permit approval is required to allow construction of a replacement pool in its same location which has nonconforming conditions. The existing pool is located within the front area of the lot and is within 10 feet of the pool house which is not allowed per code. The current pool, also does not meet the required lakeshore setback requirement as it is located 44.7 ft. from the 929.4 OHWM for Lake Minnetonka and the required setback is 50 feet. The current pool also does not meet the required minimum construction elevation of 933.0 for structures on Lake Minnetonka. With the project, the bottom elevation of the pool will be raised from 932.4 to meet the minimum required construction elevation of 933.0, as required for structures on Lake Minnetonka per City Code Sec. 129-196. Therefore, expansion permit approval is required. • Pool House. Variance approval is required for construction of a replacement pool house as the footprint is being expanded to include an outdoor shower deck on the east side. The existing pool house is deemed to be a lawful, nonconforming structure. The existing pool house is located 12.9 ft from the front property line. With the outdoor shower addition, the proposed new front setback will be 11.4 feet from the front property line. Accessory structures on a lakeshore lot are required to have a front setback of 20 feet. Members are advised that City Code Sec. 129-193 (4) states that detached decks or similar structures, which do not extend above 30 inches in elevation above the height of the surrounding grade and do not extend to a distance of less than two feet from any lot line, are allowed encroachments. If the Planning Comissision believes this provision applies to the outdoor shower deck proposed for the east side of the pool house, a variance would not be required. -3113- (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Expansion Permit City Code Section 129-40 (a) states that an expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be granted to provide relief to the landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulties. In determining whether practical difficulties exist, the City Council shall evaluate the following criteria: (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off-site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off-street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. 60 -DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed bythe City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule. The "Day 1" was determined to be November 2, 2016 for both applications. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed notice of the Planning Commission meeting agenda on November 30th to inform them of the variance and expansion permit requests for the proposed project. -3112- SITE INFORMATION The subject property fronts Priest Lane on the north side and Lake Minnetonka on the south side and is legally described as Lots 7 and 8 Lot 2, Block 2, HIGHLAND SHORES, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Per Hennepin County information, the house was constructed in 1967 on Lot 7 and a pool was constructed on Lot 8 in 1969 by previous owners. The current owners, Steve and Patricia Miller, purchased the property in 1989. Due to the pool's age and current condition, the owners would like to replace the pool and undertake related improvements on the property including, but not limited to, the replacement of the pool house, replacement of the at -grade patio, installation of new landscaping and also replacement and installation of fencing. Prior to October 2016, Lot 7 and Lot 8 had separate PIDs. The owners recently combined the existing lots into 1 PID at Hennepin County as the zoning ordinance does not allow the construction of an accessory dwelling on a lot if it does not contain a principal structure. REVIEW PROCEDURE Variance City Code Section 129-39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and -3111- PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: December 2, 2016 PLANNING CASE NO. 16-43 (Variance) and 16-44 (Expansion Permit) SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING: BACKGROUND Variance and Expansion Permit Tabor Group Landscaping 3185 Priest Lane December 6, 2016 Low Density Residential R-1 Single Family Residential Tabor Group Landscaping is requesting variance and expansion permit approval to undertake a pool, pool house replacement project and fence replacement/installation project at 3185 Priest Lane. There are also other related site and landscaping improvements to be undertaken with the project to include construction of a pool equipment storage area, a lakeside / pool patio area, retaining walls, plantings, boulder rock outcroppings, stone steps, etc. The approvals required for the project are described below: Expansion Permits - pool and at grade patio replacement Variances - pool house replacement - installation of fences exceeding 6 feet in height within 30 -foot front setback area - installation of fences exceeding 3 feet in height within the 50 -foot lakeshore setback area - pool/mechanical equipment to be located more than 2 foot into the front setback area -3110- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 6. 2016 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Jeffrey Bergquist, Doug Gawtry, David Goode, Jameson Smieja, and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jill Norlander. PLANNING CASE NOS. 16-43 AND 16-44 VARIANCE AND EXPANSION PERMIT 3185 PRIEST LANE TABOR GROUP LANDSCAPING Smith introduced the variance and expansion permit requests. The applicant, Tabor Group Landscaping, requests approval to undertake a pool, pool house replacement and fence installation project. There are also other related site and landscaping improvements including a pool equipment storage area, a lakeside / pool patio area, retaining walls, plantings, boulder rock outcroppings and stone steps. An expansion permit is requested because the existing pool is located within the front area of the lot and within 10 feet of the pool house, which is not allowed per code. The current pool also does not meet the required minimum construction elevation and is being raised to conform. The variance is requested to allow the pool house shower deck to be constructed 7.4 feet from the front property line, the at -grade patio to be rebuilt at the same location within the 50 -foot lakeside setback and fence height variations as outlined in the planning report. Discussion Jeff Gaffney, Tabor Group, clarified the fence plan for the lot. Gaffney also explained the "jog" in the measurement by the pool house. They are staying within the existing template for the pool house with the exception of the shower. Plumbing will be tying back into the existing for the site. Steve Miller, 3185 Priest Lane, indicated they are trying to clean up the landscaping and improve it. Some of it is just scrub. Smieja was happy to see the fence issue was included. MOTION by Goode, second by Smieja, to recommend approval of the variance and expansion permit with recommendations and findings of fact as identified by staff. MOTION carried unanimously. -3109- 11. New fencing to be installed for the project shall neet the requirements contained in City Code Sec. 129-196 for swimming pools. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound this 13th day of December, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -3108- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the variances and expansion permits for the property at 3185 Priest Lane, as described in Exhibit A. with the following conditions: 1. The lowest floor of all new structures shall be at the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation for Lake Minnetonka (933.0) or three feet above a wetland. 2. The at -grade deck is required to be constructed at the setback of the existing at grade patio, at its closest point. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 4. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 5. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 6. Impervious surface coverage shall be less than 40% of the site. Hardcover calculations will be verified as part of building permit process. 7. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 8. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 9. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. 10. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. -3107- 6. The property includes an existing at grade lakeside and pool patio area which is being replaced with the project. The replacement at -grade patio area will maintain the same setback existing patio area on the lakeside at its closest point. 7 The property presently contains both 5 foot chain link and 6 foot privacy fence which are nonconforming to height requirements based on the existing locations. The project includes the installation of new six (6) ft. privacy fence and 5 ft. decorative, aluminum fencing which are the same height as the existing fences on the property. 8. The replacement pool house is being constructed within the footprint of the existing structure and is being expanded along the same building line to include an outdoor shower deck area. The outdoor shower deck area, does not include a roof, and is similar to an open deck, as opposed to an enclosed structure. 9. The proposed fence to be installed with the project will located at the RFPE. and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the expansion permit, the City Council of the City of Mound makes the following findings of fact: The criteria of City Code Section 129-40 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The existing lot of record is of a unique layout in that the house and pool are located side by side. The current pool location, which is nonconforming, is a pre-existing condition not created by the actions of the current owners. 4. The replacement pool and at grade patio will maintain the same setbacks as the current structures. 5. The replacement pool will be constructed at the 933.0 minimum construction elevation for structures which is an improved condition. -3106- (4) The expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) The expansion requested is the minimum needed. ; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance and expansion permit for the proposed project are contained in Planning Report No. 16-43 and 16-44 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance and expansion permit subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance and expansion permit requests were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its December 6, 2016 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended City Council approval of the variances and expansion permits, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance and expansion permit requests at its December 13, 2016 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner, and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the variance and expansion permit applications was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the variance, the City Council of the City of Mound makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129-39 (a) are being met 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The existing lot of record is of a unique layout in that the existing house and pool are located side by side. 4. The location of the home, the layout of the site, and location of the pool and pool house are pre-existing conditions that were not created by the actions of the current owners of the property. 5. The zoning regulations require that swimming pools are enclosed by a fence and gates not less than five feet and not higher than six (6) feet which conflicts with the 3 -foot height requirement for fences within the 50 -foot lakeshore setbacks. -3105- (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is 1 harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties"is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-40 (a) outlines the criteria for granting an expansion permit which is provided below: (1) The proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. Function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. Absence of adverse off-site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. Adequacy of off-street parking. (2) Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) The exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. -3104- RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES AND AN EXPANSION PERMITS FOR 3185 PRIEST LANE WHERAS, the applicant, Tabor Group Landscaping, on behalf of owners Steve and Patricia Miller, is requesting variance and expansion permit approval to undertake a pool, pool house replacement project and fence replacement/installation project at 3185 Priest Lane; and WHEREAS, there are also other related site and landscaping improvements to be undertaken with the project to include, but are not limited to, construction of a pool equipment storage area, a lakeside / pool patio area, retaining walls, plantings, boulder rock outcroppings and stone steps; and WHEREAS, the project requires variance approval for the following items: 1. Pool house replacement 2. Fences exceeding 6 feet in height to be located within 30 -foot front setback area 3. Fences exceeding 3 feet in height within the 50 -foot lakeshore setback area 4. Pool/mechanical equipment to be located more than 2 feet into the front setback area and WHEREAS, the project requires expansion permit approval for the following items: 1. Pool replacement 2. At grade patio replacement , and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. -3103- PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their December 6th meeting. Jeff Gaffney from Tabor Group and the property owners were present at the meeting. No persons present at the meeting commented on the applications. The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommended approval of the applications as recommended by Staff. Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, a resolution has been prepared for City Council consideration. -3102- Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: December 7, 2016 PLANNING CASE NO. 16-43 (Variance) and 16-44 (Expansion Permit) SUBJECT: Variance and Expansion Permit APPLICANT: Tabor Group Landscaping LOCATION: 3185 Priest Lane MEETING DATE: December 13, 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential BACKGROUND At its December 13th meeting, the City Council will review the applications from Tabor Group Landscaping, on behalf of owners Steve and Patricia Miller, who is requesting variance and expansion permit approval to undertake a pool, pool house replacement project and fence replacement/installation project at 3185 Priest Lane. There are also other related site and landscaping improvements to be undertaken with the project to include construction of a pool equipment storage area, a lakeside / pool patio area, retaining walls, plantings, boulder rock outcroppings, stone steps, etc. Details regarding the project are contained in Planning Report No. 16-43 and 16-44 which has been included as an attachment. SITE INFORMATION The subject property fronts Priest Lane on the north side and Lake Minnetonka on the south side and is legally described as Lots 7 and 8 Lot 2, Block 2, HIGHLAND SHORES, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Per Hennepin County information, the house was constructed in 1967 on Lot 7 and a pool was constructed on Lot 8 in 1969 by previous owners. The current owners, Steve and Patricia Miller, purchased the property in 1989. Due to the pool's age and current condition, the owners would like to replace the pool and undertake related improvements on the property including, but not limited to, the replacement of the pool house, replacement of the at -grade patio, installation of new landscaping and also replacement and installation of fencing. Prior to October 2016, Lot 7 and Lot 8 had separate PIDs. The owners recently combined the existing lots into 1 PID at Hennepin County as the zoning ordinance does not allow the construction of an accessory dwelling on a lot if it does not contain a principal structure. -3101- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 16-91 ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON LIFT STATION AND FORCEMAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR 2017 WHEREAS, a lift station reconstruction program was started in 2007 with the replacement of three (3) of the thirty (30) city -owned and operated sanitary sewer lift stations, and WHEREAS, this program continued with replacement of two (2) lift stations in 2008, three (3) in 2009, four (4) with the 2010 project, and one (1) each in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 (currently under contract) along with upgrading one lift station in 2016 for a total of nineteen (19) improved lift stations; WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), 2016-2019, includes the replacement of Lift Station C-5 (1802 Commerce Boulevard) and a new Commerce Boulevard forcemain in year 2017: and WHEREAS, the updated CIP, 2017-2021, includes the replacement of the forcemain in Commerce Boulevard from Three Points Boulevard to Grandview Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the updated CIP, 2017-2012, also includes a replacement generator for Sinclair Lift Station B3; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that Resolution No. 16-91, Ordering Report on Lift Station and Forcemain Improvement Project for 2017, be amended to include an analysis of the forcemain from Three Points Boulevard to Grandview Boulevard and a replacement generator for Sinclair Lift Station B3 and be referred to Bolton & Menk, Inc. for study and that they are instructed to report to the Council as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective, and feasible. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of December, 2016. ATTEST: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk -3100- Mark Wegscheid, Mayor QBOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. December 8, 2016 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2017 Lift Station and Forcemain Improvement Project City Project No. PW -17-05 Request to Amend Resolution Ordering Engineering Report Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: (9521448-8838 Fax: (9521448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com At the July 26, 2016 Council meeting, a request to prepare an Engineering Report for the replacement of Lift Station C5 (located at 1802 Commerce Blvd.) and the accompanying forcemain for this lift station, was approved by Resolution No. 16-91. This forcemain is referred to as the Commerce Boulevard forcemain in the approving resolution. It is proposed to be a separate forcemain from LS C5 south to the gravity manhole north of Grandview Boulevard. The referenced, Commerce Boulevard forcemain, is actually only the southern one-half of the existing forcemain in Commerce Boulevard which conveys the wastewater flow from the Baywood Shores lift station. The portion of the forcemain from Baywood Shores to Three Points Boulevard was replaced with the Three Points Boulevard West Utility Improvement Project in 2015. It was determined at that time, it would be more beneficial to have a separate contract for directional drilling a new forcemain in Commerce Boulevard from Three Points to the gravity manhole north of Grandview Boulevard. This Three Points Boulevard to Grandview forcemain project is included in the approved Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) as a 2017 project at an estimated cost of $300,000. It would be advantageous to include this forcemain replacement work with the 2017 Lift Station and Forcemain Improvement Project. We are therefore requesting approval to add it to the analysis included in the Engineering Report which we are currently working on and intend to bring to the Council on January 10, 2017 for consideration. In addition, city staff has indicated the need to replace the existing diesel powered backup generator at the Sinclair Lift Station B3 with a gas powered generator. The estimated cost for this generator replacement is included in the estimated cost for the 2017 Lift Station replacement item in the approved CIP. Please consider the attached Resolution amending Resolution 16-91 to add the replacement of the existing forcemain in Commerce Boulevard from Three Points Boulevard to Grandview Boulevard and the replacement of the Sinclair lift station generator to the items to be analyzed in the Engineering Report. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. &6'f''X 4- . Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E., City Engineer -3099- Bolton & Monk is an equal Certificate for Payment I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all Rema quentRtes and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all mrk has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorzed changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount for the Final Estimate, that the previsions of M. S. 290.92 have been compiled with and that all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been pail or salisfacMfdy secured. contractor. Geislinger & Sons, Inc. 511 Central Ave. S. P.O. Box 437 Watkins, MN 55389 Name Tills Date /dZ-7—a CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: BOLTON & MENK, INC., ENGINEERS, 2263388 SHADOW LN,, SUITE 200. CHASKA MN 55318 By �w�'�"`9 �G •C%li��(.+.c�'/�"� , CITY ENGINEER Daniel L. Faulkner we. /-I — 7-- APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: Owner. CITY OF MOUND BY Name Title Date 1•: DATE: 12/612016 CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 12 CONTRACTOR Geislinger & Sons, Inc 2015 STREET, UTILITY & RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS OWNER City of Mound CITY PROJECT NO. PW -15-01, PW -15-02, PW -15-03 ENGINEER Bolton & Menk BMI PROJECT NO. C12.108886, C12.108887 FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 7/30/2016 THROUGH 1216/2016 TOTALAMOUNT BID .............. ..................... ......... _.._........................................................ ........................................ $ 3,682,938.25 APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS +EXTRA WORK........................................................................................ $ 163,170.42 CURRENTCONTRACTAMOUNT.................................................... :......................................................... $ 3,846.108.67 TOTAL, CITY COMPLETED WORK TO DATE $ 2,438,009.06 TOTAL, MCES COMPLETED WORK TO DATE $ 964,133.76 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE..................................... _............ ......................................... ............................ $ 3,402,142.83 TOTAL, MOUND STORED MATERIALS TO DATE $ TOTAL, MCES STORED MATERIALS TO DATE $ TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE ......................... ................................................................................ .......... $ - MOUND DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED $ - MCES DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED $ - DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED.......................... _..... - ..... -......................... $ - TOTAL, MOUND COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS $ 2,438,009.06 TOTAL, MCES COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS $ 964,133.76 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS................................................................................................ $ 3,402,142.63 MOUND RETAINED PERCENTAGE ( 5.0% ) $ 121,900.45 MCES RETAINED PERCENTAGE ( 5.0% ) $ 48,206.69 RETAINEDPERCENTAGE 5.0% ).................................................................................................... $ 170,107.14 MOUND AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS $ - MCES AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS $ TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS............................................................................................................ $ - MOUND AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE $ 2,316,108.61 MCES AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE $ 915,927.08 NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE........... ........... ..... .................................................... .......................... $ 3,232,035.69 TOTAL, MOUND AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES $ 2,280,511.52 TOTAL, MCES AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES $ 915,530.56 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES ....... ........ _................................................................................... $ 3,196,042.09 CITY OF MOUND THIS ESTIMATE $ 35.597.09 MCES THIS ESTIMATE $ 396.51 PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO. 12 .................................. -............................................. ..... ....... ................... $ 35,993.60 -3097- MLENK Real People. Real Solutions. December 8, 2016 Mr. Eric Hoversten, City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: 19521448-8838 Fax: 19521448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com RE: 2015 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall Improvements — Grandview Blvd. & Tuxedo Blvd. City Project Nos. PW -15-01, PW -15-02, PW -15-03 Pay Request No. 12 Dear Mr. Hoversten: Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 12 from Geislinger & Sons, Inc. for work completed on the 2015 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Grandview Boulevard and Tuxedo Boulevard from July 30, 2016 through December 6, 2016. The amount shown as "MCES THIS ESTIMATE" will need to be invoiced to the Metropolitan Council in accordance with the Construction Cooperative Agreement number 15I032, and processed as a re -imbursement to the City. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $35,993.60 to Geislinger & Sons, Inc. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. City Engineer B:\Moun\cluoeees\l Cortes\fypo0s\2816-12-08Wa,GouncOBaranPoymenL.309C- Bolton & Menk is an equal opppporlunity employer. DATE: 11/30/2016 CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 5 CONTRACTOR Ryan Contracting Co. 2016 STREET, UTILITY 8 RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS OWNER City of Mound CITY PROJECT NO. 16-01, 16-02,16-G3, 1"4 ENGINEER Bolton 8 Monk SMI PROJECT NO. C12.110649, C12.110650,012.110651 FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 10292016 THROUGF 11/3 012 01 6 TOTALAMOUNTBID........................ .-..................................................................... _......................... ........... ...... ..... S 2,758,654.26 APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS+ EXTRA WORK...................................................................................... S 81,266.80 CURRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT........................................................................................................... c 2,838,821.06 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE ......... ............... ..................................... -.... _-................. ...................... ........ $ 2,641,666.80 TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE .... »............ ............................................................................................ $ DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED ............................................. .......... I ........ .. $ TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS ....... ......... ........... ......_...... -..-............... - .................. ........... $ 2,541,666.80 RETAINED PERCENTAGE 6.0% )...:....... --...................................................................................... $ 127,077.84 TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS............ ........... ............ .................................... - ..... .-........ ............... $ NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE .......... ..... ................................................................................_..._ $ 2,414,478.96 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES „ ................ ...... -........ ....-............................. ............ 0 ........... ...... $ 2,110,856.18. PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO.6..........»................................................................................................_.... $ 303,622.80 Certificate for Payment I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a We and correct statement of the amount for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.02 have been compiled with and that all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been pad or satisfactorily secured. contractor: Ryan Contracting Company 26480 Franoe Ave. PO Box 246 CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: BOLTON 8 MENK, I ENGINEERS, 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318 By� , CITY ENGINEER Daniel L. Faulkner Date a1711& APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: Owner. CITY OF MOUND By Name Title Date -3095- BOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. December 8, 2016 Mr. Eric Hoversten, City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: 19521448-8838 Fax: (9521448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com RE: 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall hnprovements — Bartlett Blvd., Tuxedo Blvd. Phase II, and Cypress/Maywood City Project Nos. PW -16-01, PW -16-02, PW -16-03, PW -16-04 Pay Request No. 5 Dear Mr. Hoversten: Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 5 from Ryan Contracting Company for work completed on the 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall hnprovement Project from October 29, 2016 through November 30, 2016. The Contract Amount has been increased by $909.80 for the addition of temporary striping on Tuxedo Boulevard bringing the total amount of Change Orders and Extra Work to $81,266.80. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $303,622.80 to Ryan Contracting Company. Sincerely, Bolton & Menkk, Inc. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. City Engineer Utility Billing for New Construction Accounts Original Adoption: —/—/2016 Reviewed/Updated: TBD Reference No. FIN-OXX PURPOSE: To prescribe the policies and procedures for initiating utility billing on new construction accounts. POLICY AND PROCEDURES: 1.1 Mandatory Connection Chapter 74 Utilities - mandates that all properties be connected to the water and sewer system. In the case of new construction, trunk charges for water and sewer are paid for each new connection that provides funds "to establish, construct, repair, .replace, maintain, enlarge and improve said system." In addition, service connection and meter fees are paid. 1.2 Establishment of Utility Billing Accounts As part of the requirements to issue a certificate of occupancy, the meter has to be hooked up and the remote reader functional. Assuming no service lines previously existed for the property (ie. previously vacant land or subdivision), utility billing will begin when the property is actually occupied and/or 1,000 or more gallons of use are registered during a normal read cycle and shall continue to bill from that point forward regardless of whether the property is occupied or not. -3093- Alcohol &Gambling Entarcemam Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 444 Cedar Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 651-201-7500 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 7 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number Fr. Francis Jager Council- Knights of Columbus # 6005 11-14-1967 710188 Address City State Zip Code Uo Charles Walerius FS, 1736 Pond Lane Waconia Minnesota 155387 Name of person making application Business phone Home phone Charles Walerius 1 1952-270-4706 952-479-1257 Date set ups will be sold Type of organization 13-3-2017,3-17-2017,3-24-2017,4-7-2017 [] Club E] Charitable ® Religious ® Other non-profit officer's name X lCharles Walerius Add New Officer Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. Pace Center at Our Lady of the Lake Church 2385 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minnesota 55364 State If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. None If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage. Auto -Owners Insurance general liability for $1,000,000.00 APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CRY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City/County City Fee Amount Date Fee Paid Date Approve Permit Date Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement NOTE: Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and/or county to the address above. If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be u -ed as the permit for the event. -3092- Page 1 of 1 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS FOR 2016 WHEREAS, The City of Mound is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to accept gifts and bequests for the benefit of recreational service pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.17; and WHEREAS, The following persons and entities have offered to contribute the cash sums set forth below to the City: Naive of Donor Amount Date Purpose Minnetonka Beach Civic Committee $ 100.00 8/30/16 Fire Department Donation Jane and Duane Noethe 100.00 8/11/16 Fire Department Donation Advanced First Aid 100.00 8/08/16 Fire Department Donation Greg and Erinn Becker 300.00 8/08/16 Fire Department Donation Roderick and Anne Taylor 300.00 7/14/16 Fire Department Donation Fire Department Auxiliary 1,346.52 6/20/16 Fire Department Donation Mary Opheim 25.00 4/19/16 Fire Department Donation Mound Volunteer Fire Relief Department 12,892.00 2/3/16 Fire Department Donation Fire Department Auxiliary 1,614.50 1/8/16 Fire Department Donation WHEREAS, The City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. The contributions described above are hereby acknowledged and accepted by the City of Mound. 2. The City Council of the City of Mound expresses its thanks and appreciation for the contributions. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound this 13'" day of December, 2016. ATTEST: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -3091- Mound City Council Minutes — November 22, 2016 9. Adjourn MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Gillisple, to adjourn at 7:46 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -3090- Mayor Mark Wegscheid Mound City Council Minutes —November 22, 2016 connections that can be moved easily to offer flexibility. Bohler noted flexibility in watching multiple channels at once and previewing channels in a small box before having to change. Bohler gave examples of search options, video on demand, and setting user preferences. Bohler said because it is IP based, streaming channels like Netflix and Amazon are integrated and look like any other channel. Bohler said Frontier will attempt to move the current DISH customers to Vantage TV where Public, Educational, and Government (PEG) programming fees will apply. Salazar asked what infrastructure improvements are going to be made to provide for this additional service. Bohler said investments will be made to increase capacity in the existing broadband services to accommodate this additional service and regular internet customers will experience better performance as well. Salazar asked why is this being launched now and not five years ago. Bohler said some services have been acquired from Verizon and ATT in last five years that has provided access to content in a critical mass that positions Frontier to enter this market. Salazar asked if this will be like a light switch or gradual, and Bohler said he is unsure whether the entire city will get it all at once, but everyone will eventually have access. Peterson asked about pricing for consumers. Scott said it will be designed to be competitive with cable but he did not have the data in front of him. Salazar asked whether speeds will be similar to cable and existing internet and Scott said increased speeds will be made available. Mayor Wegscheid opened the public hearing at 7:42 pm and upon receiving no comment, closed the public hearing. Wegscheid noted that the Council is just authorizing Staff to continue with legal counsel and Frontier to attempt to develop a franchise agreement. MOTION by Salazar to follow the recommendation as stated in page 2972 of the packet authorizing Staff and legal counsel to enter into a negotiation to develop the proposed franchise terms with Frontier. Seconded by Gillispie. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 7. Action to approve minutes from the November 1. 2016 Special Meetina Workshop MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Peterson, to approve minutes from November 1, 2016 Special Meeting Workshop. The following voted in favor: Salazar, Gillispie, Wegscheid, Peterson. The following voted against: none. The following abstained: Gesch. Motion carried. 8. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/reports from Council Members B. Reports: Finance Dept - September 2016 C. Minutes: POSC - June 9, 2016 Planning Commission - October 4, 2016 D. Correspondence: Hoversten noted Dec. 13th is the last scheduled meeting with the Dec 27th meeting cancelled due to the Christmas holiday. Hoversten noted upcoming holiday closures of City Hall include December 23, 26, 30 and January 2 and 16. Mound City Council Minutes — November 22, 2016 County Road 15/Shoreline Drive and Interlaken Blvd by the BP gas station. Vogel said he called Jim Creek at Hennepin County and they agreed to do a study but said ultimately the cities would have to agree to any improvements. Vogel said the intersection is technically in Spring Park, but it services mostly Mound residents on the island. Vogel said that City Manager Hoversten crafted an email to Spring Park and Hennepin County to further the conversation. Hoversten noted that when the bridge by Cooks Bay is closed for repairs, Mr. Vogel is concerned about the corresponding impact on traffic at this intersection. Hoversten said the current traffic light would have to be upgraded to provide a flashing yellow left turn. Hoversten said the traffic counts and accident history does not warrant County funding per their standards. Salazar asked what is wrong with the existing turn signal. Vogel said even when no cars are coming eastbound, cars are not allowed to turn left and a long back-up is created. Gesch said flashing yellows were added a few years ago at the high school and noted the flashing yellow also exists at the two Mound intersections. Salazar said four cities are impacted with Minnetrista and Shorewood who also have residents on the island. Vogel even suggested impacted residents may fund privately. Hoversten said he would continue the dialogue in light of the construction projects planned. 6. Public Hearinsa - Consider issuance of a franchise Applicant: Frontier Communications Bob Vose, Kennedy and Graven city attomey on cable matters, said Frontier is looking for a video franchise from a number of cities that they currently provide telephone service to. Vose said a letter was received from Mediacom, the current franchise holder. Vose noted the Frontier application and corresponding letter from the incumbent provider are essentially identical in each of the cities applications have been submitted. Vose said the two main issues raised by Mediacom are (1) in the event the Council elects to issue a franchise to Frontier there is an obligation to determine they are legally qualified and Mediacom questions whether the information provided in the application was sufficient to determine so, and (2) Level playing field law says if the City issues a competitive franchise, there has to be parity in the requirements. Vose said most cities who have received an application have moved forward based on the fact Frontier is already providing phone/network services, which demonstrates they are financially and technically qualified. Vose also noted that the Ordinance requires the franchisee to ultimately offer services to all properties in Mound and that the Ordinance requires a decision to issue a franchise within 30 days. Vose said if the Council feels they have enough information by the end of the hearing, the request is to direct staff to work with the attorney and Frontier to negotiate a franchise agreement. Wegscheid asked Vose whether he feels the concerns noted by Mediacom are a reason to delay moving forward. Vose said the Frontier Rep will speak to the company's qualifications, but noted they are a Fortune 500 company, do not require outside capital to move forward with this proposal, and have a long history of managerial and technical expertise in the telecommunications industry. Scott Bohler, Manager of Government and External Affairs for Frontier Communications, showed a Power Point presentation that covered Frontier's expertise and a summary of the proposed Vantage N program. Bohler noted there is one main wired box and three wireless Wrol-T-11 Mound City Council Minutes — November 22, 2016 E. Approve Policy FIN 010 - Official Website Policy F. Approve Policy FIN 011 - Utility Billing for Non -Homestead Properties Policy G. ORDINANCE 14-2016: ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 30 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION H. RESOLUTION NO. 16-157: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE 14-2016 BY TITLE AND SUMMARY I. ORDINANCE NO. 15-2016: ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO CEMETERIES J. RESOLUTION NO. 16-158: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE 15-2016 BY TITLE AND SUMMARY K. RESOLUTION NO. 16-159: RESOLUTION APPROVING EXPANSION PERMIT AND PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR 4941 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE L. Removed. 4L. (Removed) Approve resolution approving variance for 1920 Lakeside Lane Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, stated that additional information was received so Staff requested that the item be pulled for discussion. Smith said an addition is proposed to replace existing structures on the side and front of the property. Smith said the side setback variance would change from 1.6 to 1.4 feet and the front of structure would move closer to the front property line to 3.6 feet. Planning Commission recommended approval by majority, with one commissioner voting against. Staff recommended approval of the variance. Smith said years ago a fence permit was approved for the property at 1909 Lakeside Lane and included a site plan that showed a fence to be located approximately one foot inside the property line. Smith said there is no as built for the fence after it was installed. The 2016 survey provided with the variance application shows the current fence encroaching on the 1920 Lakeside Lane property. Beatrice Amidon, neighbor at 1909 Lakeside Lane, could not be present but submitted written comments about the variance including concerns that the existing garage encroaches on her property; also obstructed views and traffic impacts. Mayor Wegscheid asked if the new information alters Staffs recommendation for approval and Smith indicated it did not. MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 16-160: RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR 1920 LAKESIDE LANE 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the attenpa. Gary Vogel, 4313 Wilshire Blvd, said he wants to express concern about the traffic signal on -3087- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 22, 2016 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, November 22, 2016, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid; Council members Jennifer Peterson, Heidi Gesch, Kelli Gillispie and Ray Salazar Members absent: None Others present: City Manager/Public Works Director Eric Hoversten, Fin Dir/Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Scott Bazewicz, Scott Bohler, Gary Vogel, Don Goodwin, Scott Gates, Kelvin Retterath, Robert Vose Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda City Manager Eric Hoversten stated additional pages for Item 4L include 2969 A - E and for Item 6 additional pages 3036 A - C which is a letter from Mediacom regarding consideration of a issuing a franchise for Frontier. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Peterson, to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda Hoversten requested the removal of item 4L as additional information has been submitted from a neighbor. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Peterson, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $330,011.21. B. Approve minutes: October 25, 2016 regular meeting C. RESOLUTION NO. 16-156: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRACT WITH FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS FOR PHONE AND INTERNET SERVICES AND PURCHASE OF PHONE SYSTEM D. Approve Policy FIN 009 - Liquor Store Donations Policy M:. CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: December 2016 Fund Summary Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $73,622.57 Total $73,622.57 -3085- 12/05/16 4:50 PM Page 4 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $49,047.99 285 MOUND HRA $7,105.00 310 GO IMPROVEMENT -2013A $355.00 311 GO BONDS -2014A $310.00 312 2015A $8,380,000 GO BONDS $310.00 350 MOUND TRANSIT CTR SERIES 2006 $310.00 355 2003-C G.O. TIF 1-2 $310.00 362 G.O.2008 - B Improvements $310.00 363 G.O.2009-A Improvements $310.00 364 2011B GO IMPROVEMENT BONDS $310.00 365 GO IMPROVEMENT, 2012A $310.00 368 G.O.2014 - B REFUNDING BONDS $310.00 370 2011A REFUNDING BONDS $310.00 371 GO REFUNDING, 20128 $310.00 375 TIF 1-3 Debt Service $310.00 601 WATER FUND $78.30 602 SEWER FUND $324.51 670 RECYCLING FUND $12,991.77 $73,622.57 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $73,622.57 Total $73,622.57 -3085- 12/05/16 4:50 PM Page 4 CITY OF MOUND 12/05/164:50 PM Page 3 Payments Current Period: December 2016 ,U, _gym Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous COUNCIL PHOTOGRAPHS, 8 X 10 & DIGITAL $220.50 FILES Invoice 54994 6/14/2016 Transaction Date 122/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $220.50 Refer 9 REPUBLIC SERVICES Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispose DEC 2016 GARBAGE SVC $105.03 Invoice 0894-004238360 11252016 Project 16-3 Cash Payment E 670.49500.440 Other Contractual Servic NOV 2016 CITYWIDE RECYCLING PICK UP $12,991.77 SVC Invoice 0894-004235996 11252016 Transaction Date 1222016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,096.80 Refer 6 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORA _ Cash Payment E 28546388-400 Repairs & Maintenance PARKING DECK ELEVATOR -SVC - $2,455.00 HOISTWAY CLEANDOWN & WINDOW WASHING Invoice 7100327690 11/28/2016 Cash Payment E 285-46388-400 Repairs & Maintenance PARKING DECK ELEVATOR- FURNISH & $4,650.00 INSTALL NEW GLASS ON TOP & BOTTOM OF REAR WALL IN PASSENGER ELEVATOR Invoice 7100327658 11282016 Transaction Date 1222016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,105.00 Refer-�•��~ 10 !"JASTEAAP.NAGEMENTOFSII-"Ar! — Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispose GARBAGE SERVICE OCT 26 THRU NOV 10 $141.18 2016- PUBLIC WORKS BLDG- 30 YD OPEN TOP CONTAINER- ROLL OFF SVC Invoice 6971213-1593.4 11/162016 Project 16-3 Transaction Date 9/8/2016 Wells Fargo 1:I 10100 Total $141.18 CITY OF MOUND Payments 12/05/16 4:50 PM Page 2 Current Period: December 2016 Cash Payment E 311.47000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $310.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES Invoice 71678 10/72016 Cash Payment E 35546384-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees Invoice 71678 10/72016 Cash Payment E 36547000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees Invoice 71678 10/72016 Cash Payment E 37147000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees Invoice 71678 10/72016 Cash Payment E 31047000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees Invoice 71678 Transaction Date Refer` 10/72016 11/302016 1 FIVE TECHNOLOGY 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $310.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $310.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $310.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $355.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,075.00 Cash Payment E 10141920440 Other Contractual Servic SUPPORT BLOCK OF 20 HOURS- NETWORK $2,400.00 MTCE- 1 D-26-16 Invoice P23740 10262016 Cash Payment E 10141920440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY MANAGED SVC & NETWORK $1,290.00 MTCE- DECEMBER 2016 Invoice 11216-27 12/12016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,690.00 Refer 5 GILLESPIE CENTER _ Cash Payment E 10141115430 Miscellaneous COMMUNITY SVCS & RECREATIONAL $30,000.00 FACILITIES SUPPORT DONATION TO GILLESPIE CENTER 2ND HALF 2016 PYMT Invoice 121316 11/302016 Transaction Date 12/1/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $30,000.00 Refer 7 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One -Call NOVEMBER 2016 LOCATES $78.30 Invoice 6110585 11/302016 _- Cash Payment E 60249450395 Gopher One -Call NOVEMBER 2016 LOCATES $78.30 Invoice 6110585 11/302016 PUBLIC WORKS ASOC FALL CONFERENCE Transaction Date 122/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $156.60 Refer 11 HENNEPINCOUNTY TREASURER - PARK -11 17 & 11 18- E. HOVERSTEN Cash Payment E 10141550350 Printing 2017 TRUTH IN TAXATION NOTICE $954.79 CALCULATION, PRINT, PREP & MAILING Invoice 121316 1222016 Transaction Date 1222016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $954.79 Refer 38 HOVERSTEN, ERIC _- Cash Payment E 10141310331 Use of personal auto REIMBURSE MILEAGE- TO AMERICAN $64.80 PUBLIC WORKS ASOC FALL CONFERENCE @EARL BROWN CENTER- BROOKLYN PARK -11 17 & 11 18- E. HOVERSTEN Invoice 121316 12/52016 Transaction Date 12/52016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64.80 Refer .� 8 LINDA S PHOTOGRAPHY -3083- ow +til Batch Name 121316CITY2 Payments CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: December 2016 User Dollar Amt $73,622.57 Computer Dollar Amt $73,622.57 $0.00 In Balance Refer 4 AMERICAN MESSAGING 12/05/16 4:50 PM Page 1 Cash Payment E 10143100.321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NEW -REPLACEMENT PAGERS SHIPPING- $71.90 NEW STREET DEPT STAFF Invoice D20620260L 12/12016 Transaction Date 12/12016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $71.90 Refer 6 BENIEK PROPERTY SVCS INC. Cash Payment E 10143100440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #1 CBD NOV 30 2016 PLOWING $403.00 Invoice 147599 11/30/2016 Cash Payment E 10143100440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #2 TRUE VALUE -RAMP -SIDEWALKS $439.00 NOV 30 2016 PLOWING& SHOVELING Invoice 147599 11/302016 Cash Payment E 10143100440 Other Contractual Servic AREA #3 COMMERCE BLVD NOV 30 2016 $2,205.00 PLOWING Invoice 147599 11/302016 Transaction Date 1222016 Wells Fargo Referm 2 CONTRACT RESOURCE SERVICE 10100 Total $3,047.00 Cash Payment E 10141910-500 Capital Outlay FA NEW CARPET INSTALLATION COMPLETION $10,999.00 2016 -CENTENNIAL BLDG- PER RES 16 -123 - LEVELS 5, 2, 1 Invoice 26831 111142016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,999.00 Refer .... a�3EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 4 Cash Payment E 36447000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $310.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES Invoice 71678 10172016 Cash Payment E 37047000.620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $310.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES Invoice 71678 10/72016 Cash Payment E 37547000.620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $310.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES Invoice 71678 10/72016 Cash Payment E 362-47000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $310.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES Invoice 71678 10/72016 Cash Payment E 36347000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $310.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES Invoice 71678 10/72016 Cash Payment E 31247000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $310.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES Invoice 71678 10/72016 Cash Payment E 35047000.620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $310.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES Invoice 71678 10/72016 Cash Payment E 36847000-620 Fiscal Agent a Fees 2016 DISCLOSURE REPORTING & COUNTY $310.00 AUDITOR CERTIFICATES Invoice 71678 10/72016 -3082- CITY OF MOUND 12/02/164:19 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: December 2016 Batch Name NOV16UBREFND User Dollar Amt $799.91 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $799.91 $0.00. In Balance Refer 1 POTAS, RONALD _ Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2940 BRIGHTON BLVD (A. GIBSON)- UTILITY $799.91 REFUND- R. POTAS Invoice 120516 11/302016 Transaction Date 1222016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $799.91 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 601 WATER FUND $799.91 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $799.91 Total $799.91 $799.91 -3081- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: December 2016 Cash Payment E 609.49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 7110118 11/30/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 7110119 11/30/2016 Transaction Date 11/30/2016 Wells Fargo Fund Summary 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $125,455.38 $125,455.38 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $125,455.38 Total $125,455.38 1:1 10100 12/05/16 5:19 PM Page 9 $3,048.34 $19.75 Total $4,111.09 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Perlod: December 2016 12/05/16 5:19 PM Page 8 {CT t: m WINE rte.. Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $96.70 Invoice 1177272 11/21/2016 E 60949750-265 Freight FREIGHT Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $892.15 Invoice 1176770 11/18/2016 Invoice 0167333 11232016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $957.90 Invoice 1178974 11/23/2016 FREIGHT Cash Payment Transaction Date 11/30/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,305.70 Refer 32 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED WINE Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0167316 11/23/2016 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0167316 11/132016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 0167333 11232016 Invoice 21765 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0167333 11232016 FREIGHT Cash Payment E 60949750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rasa SODA Invoice 0166666 11/172016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0166666 11/172016 34 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0166665 11/172016 $613.00 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0166665 11/172016 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Cash Payment E 60949750.251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0167740 12/12016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0167740 12/12016 11222016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo Refer i � � 33 WINE COMPANY -$124.00 $700.83 $9.00 $610.00 $12.00 $120.00 $12.00 $438.50 $6.00 $222.25 $5.00 10100 Total $2,135.58 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $560.00 Invoice 20971 11222016 Cash Payment E 60949750.265 Freight FREIGHT $8.25 Invoice 20971 1122/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,012.67 Invoice 21765 12/12016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight FREIGHT $9.90 Invoice 21765 12/12016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,590.82 Refer .�_. 34 WINE MERCHANTS _ Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $613.00 Invoice 7108070 11/16/2016 Cash. Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $160.00 Invoice 7108311 11117/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $394.00 Invoice 7109293 11222016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$124.00 Invoice 709670 922016 -3079- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: December 2016 12/05/16 5:19 PM Page 7 Transaction Date 12/52016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $52.01 _Refer 27 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 12-15-16 $15.00 EDITION Invoice S0552315 11/152016 Cash Payment E 60949750-255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 11-15-16 $15.00 EDITION Invoice 50546586 10/182016 Cash Payment E 60949750-255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 1130.16 $15.00 EDITION Invoice S0549539 11/12016 28 SOUTHERN WINE &SPIRITS OF _ Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $45.00 Refer 29 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Invoice 1478827 Cash Payment E 60949750.253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,238.02 Invoice 1476355 11/172016 E 609-49750.251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,442.50 Invoice 1476356 11/172016 Cash Payment Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,660.52 Refer ._e 28 SOUTHERN WINE &SPIRITS OF _ Cash Payment E 60949750.253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,532.06 Invoice 1478827 11232016 Cash Payment E 609-49750.251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,065.54 Invoice 1478828 11232016 Cash Payment E 60949750.254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $69.78 Invoice 1478829 11232016 11/172016 Cash Payment E 60949750.253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,707.20 Invoice 1481342 11/302016 11292016 Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,613.05 Invoice 1481343 11/302016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,987.63 Refer 31 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 60949750.252 Beer For Resale BEER $12.82 Invoice 1178636 11292016 Cash Payment E 60949750.252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,530.55 Invoice 1178635 11292016 Cash Payment E 609-49750.255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCH- 2016 XMAS STEINS $165.00 Invoice 1176596 11/172016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $367.00 Invoice 1178636 11292016 Cash Payment E 60949750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rasa MIX $18.00 Invoice 1178636 11292016 Cash Payment E 60949750.253 Wine For Resale WINE $150.60 Invoice 1178636 11292016 Transaction Date 11/30/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,243.97 Refer 30 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $6,358.95 Invoice 1177271 11212016 -3078- CITY OF MOUND 12/05/16 5:19 PM Page 6 Payments Current Period: December 2016 Transaction Date 11/30/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $642.35 Refer 21 MOUND, CITY OF Cash Payment E 609-49750-382 Water Utilities WATER SERVICE 10316 THRU 11-1-16HWS $56.84 Invoice 121316 1120/2016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $56.84 Refer 22 PARLEY LAKE WINERY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $120.00 Invoice 16206 11222016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $426.00 Invoice 16194 11212016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $546.00 Refer j T 24 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$71.00 Invoice 8569773CM 11/162016 Cash Payment E 609.49750-265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT -$1.25 Invoice 8569773CM 11/16/2016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total •�— -$72.25 Refer r� 23 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,094.02 Invoice 8570426 11212016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $16.25 Invoice 8570426 11212016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $265.49 Invoice 8570914 1128/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $4.50 Invoice 8570914 11282016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,380.26 Refer . . 26 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $995.20 Invoice 2075113 11/162016 Cash Payment E 609.49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $268.50 Invoice 2075112 11/162016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,665.25 Invoice 2081634 11/30/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale LIQUOR $638.70 Invoice 2081633 11/302016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,567.65. Refer 25 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,954.50 Invoice 2078909 11222016 Cash Payment E 609-49750.253 Wine For Resale WINE $597.40 Invoice 2078910 11222016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ------ $2,551.90 Refer 40 PLUNKETT S, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic PEST CONTROL SVC- QUARTERLY - HWS $52.01 11-2-16 Invoice 5569261 1122016 -3077- CITY OF MOUND 12105/16 5:19 PM Page 5 Payments Current Period: December 2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $6,192.65 Invoice 2616614 11/302016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,266.26 Refer 18 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT $204.05 Invoice 598653 10/312016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$7.58 Invoice 600678 11/112016 Cash Payment E 609.49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$35.25 Invoice 598981 1122016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $161.22 Refer �17JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR .� Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/MIX For Resa MIX $56.20 Invoice 5593950 11222016 Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,346.20 Invoice 5593947 11/22/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,231.55 Invoice 5593948 11222016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $60.00 Invoice 5593949 11222016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale LIQUOR $3,363.00 Invoice 5598090 11/302016 Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,443.95 Invoice 5598091 11/302016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,500.90 Refer. 19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $43.98 Invoice 5588392 11/162016 Cash Payment E 609.49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,373.05 Invoice 5588390 11/162016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $5,964.60 Invoice 5588391 11/162016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT- INV #5484457CR -$1.62 Invoice 600679 11/112016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $24.60 Invoice 5598092 11/302016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,404.61 Refer 39 MARGRON SKOGLUND KINE IMP _ Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $506.50 Invoice 20020521 11/302016 Transaction Date 12/52016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $506.50 Refer 20 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY - Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 11-03-16 $303.05 Invoice 32446 11/32016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 11-07-16 $24.65 Invoice 32446 11/72016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 11-10-16 $314.65 Invoice 32446 11/102016 -3076- CITY OF MOUND 12/05/16 5:19 PM Page 4 Payments Current Period: December 2016 =ir. Transaction Date 12/52016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $209.40 Refer 10 COCA COLA BOTTLING -MIDWEST E 60949750.252 Beer For Resale BEER $145.60 Cash Payment E 60949750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rosa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $203.44 Invoice 3601201863 11292016 Cash Payment E 60949750.254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rosa MIX Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $203.44 Refer11 DAHLHE/MER BEVERAGE LLC _ E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 11/162016 $730.60 Invoice 1225472 11/162016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 11/302016 $375.00 Invoice 1225472 11/162016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 11/302016 $1,146.80 Invoice 1227424 11/302016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,252.40 Refer 12 ENKI BREWING COMPANY Cash Payment E 60949750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rose BEER $390.87 Invoice 6453 11/14/2016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $390.87 Refer l 13 FLAHERTY S HAPPY TYME COMP Cash Payment E 60949750.254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rosa MIX $366.00 Invoice 32519 11/16/2016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo —•�� 10100 `�— Total $366.00 '— Refer --14.GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA__ Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $320.00 Invoice 00012755 11/162016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.25 Invoice 00012755 11/16/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750.253 Wine For Resale WINE $88.00 Invoice 00013494 12/12016 Cash Payment E 60949750.265 Freight FREIGHT $2.25 Invoice 00013494 12/12016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $412.50 Refer 15 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ _ Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,672.00 Invoice 862658 11/232016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,672.00 Refer 16 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 60949750.252 Beer For Resale BEER $145.60 Invoice 2597152 11/162016 Cash Payment E 60949750.254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rosa MIX $77.60 Invoice 2597152 11/162016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,793.23 Invoice 2597151 11/162016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $49.20 Invoice 2616616 11/302016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,008.00 Invoice 2616629 11/302016 -3075- CIN OF MOUND 12/05/165:19 PM Page 3 Payments Current Period: December 2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,527.98 Invoice 1090638815 11/16/2016 Cash Payment E 609.49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,214.51 Invoice 1090644196 11/30/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $83.00 Invoice 1090644197 11/30/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $123.00 Invoice 1090644198 11/30/2016 Transaction Date 11/30/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,561.00 Refer + 9 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE _ Cash Payment E 609.49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $796.25 Invoice 1080555900 11/172016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,149.65 Invoice 1080555899 11/172016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,917.98 Invoice 1080559536 11232016 Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,355.71 Invoice 1080559535 11/232016 Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$25.93 Invoice 2080147420 8/302016 Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$22.75 Invoice 2080149658 9/202016 Cash Payment E 60949750.251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$249.39 Invoice 2080150174 9/302016 Cash Payment E 60949750.251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$149.50 Invoice 2080152767 10/192016 Cash Payment E 60949750.251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$45.00 Invoice 2080152768 10/192016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,727.02 Refer . . p %36 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE Cash Payment E 60949750.254 Soft Drinks/MIx For Rasa MIX $168.67 Invoice 1080562676 12/12016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,074.39 Invoice 1080562675 12/12016 Cash Payment E 609-49750.253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,796.26 Invoice 1080562677 12/12016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $420.00 Invoice 1080562678 12/12016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $420.00 Invoice 1080562679 12/12016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $420.00 Invoice 1080562680 12/12016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $420.00 Invoice 1080562681 12/12016 Transaction Date 12/52016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,719.32 Refer 37 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO. Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 67-1057 12/12016 -3074- $209.40 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: December 2016 12/05/16 5:19 PM Page 2 Cash Payment E 60919750-265 Freight FREIGHT $40.30 Invoice 56353400 11/18/2016 Cash Payment E 60919750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,559.55 Invoice 56313600 11/162016 Cash Payment E 60919750-265 Freight FREIGHT $26.35 Invoice 56313600 11/162016 Cash Payment E 60919750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,787.20 Invoice 56386200 11222016 Cash Payment E 60919750-265 Freight FREIGHT $55.80 Invoice 56386200 11222016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,201.39 �— Refer 35 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 60919750.251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $976.50 Invoice 56489800 11/302016 Cash Payment E 60919750.265 Freight FREIGHT $17.05 Invoice 56489800 11/302016 Cash Payment E 60919750.253 Wine For Resale WINE $80.00 Invoice 56490700 11/302016 Cash Payment E 60919750.265 Freight FREIGHT $1.55 Invoice 56490700 11/302016 Transaction Date 12/5/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,075.10 Refer m 7 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN Cash Payment E 60919750.254 Soft Ddnks/Mix For Resa MIX $37.20 Invoice 330590 11222016 Cash Payment E 60919750.252 Beer For Resale BEER $550.10 Invoice 330591 11222016 Cash Payment E 60919750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $787.20 Invoice 331574 11/302016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,374.50 Refer...�� y6BERNICKSBEVERAGES AND VEN Cash Payment E 60919750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $62.40 Invoice 329396 11/162016 Cash Payment E 60919750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $800.60 Invoice 329397 11/162016 Cash Payment E 60919750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$66.60 Invoice 329397-2 11/162016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $796.40 Refer 35 BLUE SKY MEDIA Cash Payment E 60919750-340 Advertising 12 PAGE AD DECEMBER 2016 WEST $273.00 METRO BUSINESS PUBLICATION Invoice Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $273.00 Refer y r �„_. 8 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE _ Cash Payment E 60919750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $449.00 Invoice 1090641216 11222016 Cash Payment E.609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,163.51 Invoice 1090641215 11222016 -3073- Batch Name 121316HWS Payments CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: December 2016 User Dollar Amt $125,455.38 Computer Dollar Amt $125,455.38 $0.00 Balance Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE 12/05/16 5:19 PM Page 1 Cash Payment E 60949750.255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $41.28 Invoice 1928632806 11/23/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 1928632806 11/23/2016 Transaction Date 11/30/2016 Due 12/31/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $42.28 Refers 2 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $699.00 Invoice 3140636 11/17/2016 Transaction Date 11/30/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $699.00 Refer 3 BAUHAUS BREW LABS-�— Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $98.00 Invoice 12368 11/29/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $156.50 Invoice 12186 11/172016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $254.50 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION _Refer Cash Payment E 60949750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES- C FOLD TOWELS $28.00 Invoice 94939000 11/182016 Cash Payment E 60949750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rasa MIX $49.00 Invoice 94939000 11/182016 Cash Payment E 60949750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES- BAGS $167.59 Invoice 94939500 11/182016 Cash Payment E 60949750.254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rasa MIX $98.00 Invoice 94970300 11282016 Cash Payment E 60949750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES- BAGS- LIQUOR SLEEVES $27.84 Invoice 94949300 11222016 Cash Payment E 60949750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES- BAGS $190.25 Invoice 94985800 11/30/2016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $560.68 ., Refer 5 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 60949750.253 Wine For Resale WINE $288.00 Invoice 56353500 11/182016 Cash Payment E 60949750.265 Freight FREIGHT $5.43 Invoice 56353500 11/182016 Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $41.33 Invoice 56357100 11/182016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight FREIGHT $0.26 Invoice 56357100 11/182016 Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,345.47 Invoice 56452900 11262016 Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,051.70 Invoice 56353400 11/182016 -3072- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: December 2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 524230989 11/142016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 524230989 11/142016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 524230989 11/14/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 524230989 11/142016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 524230989 11/142016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 524230989 11/142016 Cash Payment E 10141930-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 524230989 11/14/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 524230989 11/142016 Cash Payment E 10141910-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 524230989 11/142016 Cash Payment E 28546388-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 524230989 11/142016 Cash Payment E 10142115-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 524230989 11/142016 Transaction Date 11/292016 Refer 21 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 10143100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 525297775 11222016 Cash Payment E 60249450-381 Electric Utilities 11/29/16 3:54 PM Page 6 ELECTRIC SVC - 9-21-16 TO 10-22-16 $129.06 ELECTRIC SVC - 9-21-16 TO 10-22-16 DEPOT $51.77 BLDG ELECTRIC SVC - 9-21-16 TO 10-22-16 $3,510.93 ELECTRIC SVC -9-21-16 TO 10-22-16 $1,727.08 ELECTRIC SVC -9-21-16 TO 10-22-16 $3,728.76 ELECTRIC SVC - 9-21-16 TO 10-22-16 $1,472.48 ELECTRIC SVC - 9-21-16 TO 10-22-16 $1,061.97 ELECTRIC SVC - 9-21-16 TO 10-22-16 $1,061.98 ELECTRIC SVC - 9-21-16 TO 10-22-16 $1,131.75 ELECTRIC SVC - 9-21-16 TO 10-22-16 $1,442.27 ELECTRIC SVC - 9-21-16 TO 10-22-16 $20.76 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15,338.81 SHORELINE -COMMERCE STREET LIGHTS $61.56 10-23-16 THRU 11-21-16 $4,056.59 ELECTRIC SVC 10-24-16 THRU 11-21-16 $76.40 CARLOW RD LIFT STATION $20,907.80 Invoice 525349352 1123/2016 Transaction Date 11/292016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $137.96 Fund Summary Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $63,666.79 Total $63,666.79 -3071- 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $14,613.08 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $1,522.80 285 MOUND HRA $4,056.59 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $8,964.35 601 WATER FUND $20,907.80 602 SEWER FUND $10,429.69 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $1,472.48 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $1,700.00 $63,666.79 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $63,666.79 Total $63,666.79 -3071- CITY OF MOUND 11/29/163:54 PM Page 5 Payments Current Period: December 2016 _ UEZEN -v• _ E 60249450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- RAY HANSON - Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #315 DATACARD SVC 10- $35.01 11-16 THRU 11-10.2016 TABLET -INTERNET SVC Invoice 9775108368 11/10/2016 Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #512 L. GIESE DATACARD $35.01 SVC 10-11-16 THRU 11-10-2016 11292016 Invoice 9775108368 11/10/2016 $2,829.10 Cash Payment E 10143100-205 Computer Hardware/Soft EQUIPMENT-VERIZON TABLET STREETS $499.99 LEAD WORKER- B.KRESS Invoice 9775108368 11/10/2016 E 60149400-500 Capital Outlay FA Cash Payment E 10145206-205 Computer Hardware/Soft EQUIPMENT-VERIZON TABLET -PARKS $499.99 LEAD WORKER- G. BALL Invoice 9775108368 11/10/2016 Cash Payment E 60149400-205 Computer Hardware/Soft EQUIPMENT-VERIZON TABLET -UTILITIES $499.99 LEAD WORKER- R. PRICH Invoice 9775108368 11/10/2016 11/222016 Cash Payment E 60249450-205 Computer Hardware/Soft EQUIPMENT-VERIZON TABLET - PUBLIC $499.99 WORKS SUPERVISOR- R. HANSON 11/292016 Invoice 9775108368 11/10/2016 $6,505.00 Cash Payment E 60249450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $29.93 SVC Invoice 9775108368 11/10/2016 Cash Payment E 60149400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $29.93 SVC Invoice 9775108368 11/10/2016 Cash Payment E 10145200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT SPOT $59.88 Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Cash Payment E 10143100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $59.90 SPOT Invoice 9775108368 11/10/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- RAY HANSON - $59.86 TABLET- HOT SPOT Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Project 16.5 Cash Payment E 60249450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT SPOT $29.98 Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Cash Payment E 60149400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT SPOT $29.98 Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Cash Payment E 10145200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $59.86 SVC Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Cash Payment E 10143100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET- $59.86 INTERNET SVC Invoice 9775108368 11/10/2016 Cash Payment E 60249450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- RAY HANSON - $59.86 TABLET -INTERNET SVC Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Project 16-5 Transaction Date 11292016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,829.10 Refer 19 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC _ Cash Payment E 60149400-500 Capital Outlay FA REPAIR SEWER SVC @ BARTLETT BLVD 11- $6,505.00 09-16- 2015 BARTLETT WATERMAIN IMPROV PROJ PW 15-09 Invoice 4200 11/222016 Project PW1509 Transaction Date 11/292016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,505.00 Refer 20XCELENERGY -3070- CITY OF MOUND 11/29/163:54 PM Page 4 Payments Current Period: December 2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 10-14-16 THRU 11- $147.83 13-2016 Invoice 9775320144 11/132016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 10-14-16 THRU 11- $85.29 13-2016 Invoice 9775320144 11/132016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 10-14-16 THRU 11- $89.20 13-2016 Invoice 9775320144 11/132016 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 10.14-16 THRU 11- $38.38 13-2016 Invoice 9775320144 11/132016 Cash Payment E 10145200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 10-14-16 THRU 11- $93.79 13-2016 Invoice 9775320144 11/13/2016 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 10-14-16 THRU 11- $55.27 13-2016 Invoice 9775320144 11/132016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 10-14-16 THRU 11- $101.42 13-2016 Invoice 9775320144 ' 11/132016 Cash Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 10-14-16 THRU 11- $15.64 13-2016 Invoice 9775320144 11/132016 Transaction Date 11/29/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $658.31 Refer. 18 VERIZON WIRELESS _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi SEWER TRUCK #109 DATACARD SVC 10-11- $35.01 16 THRU 11-10-2016 , Invoice 9775108368 11/10/2016 Cash Payment E 60249450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS SUPV VEHC #113 R. HANSON $35.01 DATACARD SVC 10-11-16 THRU 11-10-2016 Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Project 16.3 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS JET PACK LAPTOP AIRCARD $35.01 SVC 10-11-16 THRU 11-10-2016 Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Project 163 Cash Payment E 10142400.321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 10-11-16 $17.51 THRU 11-10-2016 Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Cash Payment E 10142115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 10-11-16 $17.50 THRU 11-10-2016 Invoice 9775108368 111102016 Cash Payment E 22242260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #42 DUTY $35.01 OFFICER 10-11-16 THRU 11-10-2016 Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Cash Payment E 22242260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #39 RESCUE $35.01 UTILITY 10-11-16 THRU 11-10-2016 Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Cash Payment E 22242260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE #40 10-11-16 $35.01 THRU 11-10-2016 Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 Cash Payment E 22242260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE #29 10-11- $35.01 16 THRU 11-10-2016 Invoice 9775108368 11/102016 -3069- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: December 2016 11/29/16 3:54 PM Page 3 s .— .. E 601-49400-322 Postage OCTOBER 2016- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $316.01 Cash Payment E 401-43136-300 Professional Srvs BITUMINOUS PLANT INSPECTION 6-28-16 - $84.80 Cash Payment E 602-49450-322 Postage 2016 STREET PROJ PW 16-01 & 16-02 $316.02 Invoice P00006740 11/18/2016 Project PW1602 Transaction Date 11/29/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $169.60 Refer 12 OFFICE DEPOT _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies PRINTER CARTRIDGES- MAGENTA, $323.98 $1,700.00 YELLOW- PUB WRKS MACHINE Invoice 878166071001 11/9/2016 PO 24672 Transaction Date 10/4/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $323.98 Refer 13 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS Cash Payment Invoice 161055 Cash Payment E 601-49400-307 Admin/Finance/Compute OCTOBER 2016 -CIS DATA HOSTING, PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT 11/18/2016 E 602.49450-307 Admin/Finance/Compute OCTOBER 2016 -CIS DATA HOSTING, PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 161055 11/16/2016 $1,751.93 $1,751.92 Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage OCTOBER 2016- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $316.01 Invoice 161055 11/18/2016 _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 602-49450-322 Postage OCTOBER 2016- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $316.02 Invoice 161055 11/18/2016 Transaction Date 11/29/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,135.88 Refer - ^ 14 RITTER & RITTER SEWER SVC IN Cash Payment E 67549425-440 Other Contractual Servic CLEAN STORM SEWER- USE EASEMENT $1,700.00 MACHINE Invoice 172452 Transaction Date Refer Cash Payment 11/152016 11292016 Wells Fargo 10100 22 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORA E 285-46388.440 Other Contractual Servic PARKING DECK ELEVATOR MTCE CONTRACT 11-01-16 THRU 10-31-17 Invoice 8104392742 11/12016 Transaction Date 11/292016 Refer 15 SWEEPER SERVICES Cash Payment Wells Fargo 10100 E 101-43100.440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR STREET SWEEPER- GEARBOX HOUSING WAS BROKEN, U JOINT & OUTPUT SHAFTS WERE SPLIT- BROOM LOCKED UP- REPAIRS & PARTS Invoice 16279 11/182016 Transaction Date 11/292016 Refer 16 TRAUT COMPANIES, INC. _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 292713 11/16/2016 Transaction Date 11292016 Refer 17 VERIZON WIRELESS Cash Payment G 101-13100 Due From Other Funds Invoice 9775320144 11/132016 Total $1,700.00 $2,614.32 Total $2,614.32 $3,407.30 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,407.30 3/8" PUMP PACKING FOR WELL PUMPS- $55.66 WATER DEPT Wells Fargo 10100 Total $55.66 CELL PHONE CHARGES 10-14-16 THRU 11- 13-2016 1.: $31.49 CITY OF MOUND 1129/16 3:54 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: December 2016 Refer 5EGAN COMPANIES Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maintenance • STREET LIGHTING MTCE & REPAIR- NOV $4,655.39 2016 6 -MONTH INSPECTION Invoice JC10146781 11222016 Transaction Date 11/292016 Refer 6 FLEETPRIDE TRUCK & TRAILER P Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply Wells Fargo 10100 Total DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID 2.5 GALLONS- 8 QTY- PUB WKS & PARKS $4,655.39 $58.80 Invoice 81272896 11/18/2016 Project 165 Transaction Date 11292016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $58.80 Refer 7 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NETWORK ETHERNET SVC 11-20.16 THRU $187.61 12-20-16 Invoice 4726324 1120/2016 Cash Payment E 101-41920-321 Telephone, Cells, & Red! NETWORK ETHERNET SVC 11-20-16 THRU $562.81 12-20-16 Invoice 4726324 11202016 Transaction Date 11292016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $750.42 Refer _ _ 8 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD _ Cash Payment E 60149400-210 Operating Supplies WATER METERS & SUPPLIES- COUPLING, $2,042.23 CURB BOX, STATIONARY RODS Invoice G421604 11/112016 Transaction Date 11/292016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,042.23 Refer 9 HYDRO KLEAN _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA VAC TRUCK SEWER DEPT NOZZLE & JETS $2,667.60 REPLACEMENT Invoice 55554 11222016 PO 24653 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies MARING PAINT & MARKING FLAGS $646.00 Invoice 56476 11/152016 Cash Payment E 60249450-220 Repair/Maint Supply GASKET, 2 12" NOSE COUPLING $22.35 Invoice 56464 11/15/2016 Transaction Date 11292016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,335.95 Refer 23 KELLY, KEVIN _ Cash Payment E 10141410331 Use of personal auto REIMB MILEAGE- K. KELLY- ELECTIONS- TO $31.00 CITHY POLLING SITES, HENNEP CTY GOVT CTR - DROPP OFF ELECTION RESULT MATERIALS, PARKING 10-26 THRU 11-15- 16Y HALL 10-5-16 Invoice 121316 11292016 Transaction Date 11/292016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $31.00 Refer_ 10 MINNESOTA DEPTOFHEALTH Cash Payment R 601-4940037170 State fee -Water 4TH QTR 2016 COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY $5,793.00 SVC CONNECTION FEE Invoice 121316 11/162016 Transaction Date y 11/292016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total �� _i''_�-�_'— $5,793.00 Refer 11 MN DEPT TRANSPORTA TION ��•�_=`ii-�-f-� Cash Payment E40143116-300 Professional Srvs BITUMINOUS PLANT INSPECTION 6-28-16 - $84.80 2016 STREET PROJ PW 16-01 & 16-02 Invoice P00006740 11/182016 Project PW1601 -3067- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: December 2016 Batch Name 121316CITY User Dollar Amt $63,666.79 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $63,666.79 Refer 1 ASPEN EQUIPMENT Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 10169338 11/16/2016 Transaction Date 11/29/2016 Refer 2BRAUN INTERTEC Cash Payment E 401-43146-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 8077423 11/172016 Cash Payment E 401-43116-500 Capital Outlay FA $0.00 In Balance 11/29/16 3:54 PM Page 1 w .. -. m - ?' ADAPTER BUSHING- PARKS DEPT $115.74 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $115.74 2016 STREET IMPROV PROJ PW 16-03 CYPRESS -CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING Project PW1603 2016 STREET IMPROV PROJ PW 16-01 BARTLETT BLVD -CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING Invoice 8077423 11/17/2016 Project PW1601 Transaction Date 11/29/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 3 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES IN _ Cash Payment E222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying NOVEMBER 2016- COPIER RENTAL- FIRE DEPT Invoice 16712839 11/12/2016 Transaction Date 11/29/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer __ _4 CEN_TERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 1758 SUMACH LANE LS GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 4-20.16 THRU 5-20-16 Invoice 121316 11/22/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 2649 EMERALD DR. LS E3 GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 4-20-16 THRU 5-20-16 Invoice 121316 11/22/2016 Cash Payment E 60249450-383 Gas Utilities 4791 NORTHERN RD LS Of GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 4-20-16 THRU 5-20-16 Invoice 121316 11/22/2016 Cash Payment E 60249450-383 Gas Utilities 3303 WATERBURY RD LS GAS SVC 4-20-16 THRU 5-20.16 Invoice 121316 11/22/2016 Cash Payment E 60249450.383 Gas Utilities 2990 HIGHLAND BLVD LS B1 GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 4-20-16 THRU 5-20-16 Invoice 121316 11/22/2016 Cash Payment E 60249450-383 Gas Utilities 4948 BARTLETT LS E2 GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 4-20-16 THRU 5-20-16 Invoice 121316 11/22/2016 Cash Payment E 60249450-383 Gas Utilities 4728 CARLOW RD LS GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 4-20-16 THRU 5-20-16 Invoice 121316 11/22/2016 Cash Payment E 60249450-383 Gas Utilities 5808 GRANDVIEW BLVD LS GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 4-20-16 THRU 5-20-16 Invoice 121316 11/222015 Cash Payment E 60249450-383 Gas Utilities 4922 THREE PTS BLVD LS GENERATOR NATL GAS SVC 4-20-16 THRU 5-20-16 Invoice 121316 11/22/2016 Transaction Date 11/29/2016 - Wells Fai or% _ 10100 Total $2,638.42 $6,156.33 $8,794.75 $31.75 $31.75 $19.79 $18.60 $21.62 $19.79 $21.61 $18.60 $18.60 $21.61 $21.62 $181.84 CITY OF MOUND Payments 12/01/16 9:17 AM Page 2 Current Period: December 2016 ism Cash Payment E 22242260-438 Licenses and Taxes 2010 CHEVY TAHOE- FIRE UNIT #39 $21.75 VEHICLE REGISTRATION, TITLE & STATE FILING RENEWAL FEES Invoice 120116 12/1/2016 Cash Payment E 22242260438 Licenses and Taxes Invoice 120116 12/1/2016 Cash Payment E 22242260438 Licenses and Taxes 1990 E -ONE RESCUE - FIRE UNIT #22 $21.75 VEHICLE REGISTRATION, TITLE & STATE FILING RENEWAL FEES 2004 PACE AMERICAN CARGO TRAILER- $21.75 FIRE UNIT#30 VEHICLE REGISTRATION, TITLE & STATE FILING RENEWAL FEES Invoice 120116 12/1/2016 Cash Payment E 22242260438 Licenses and Taxes 2013 CHEVY TAHOE- FIRE DUTY TRUCK $21.75 UNIT 042 VEHICLE REGISTRATION, TITLE & STATE FILING RENEWAL FEES Invoice 120116 12/1/2016 Transaction Date 12/1/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $87.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $5,418.93 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $142.97 602 SEWER FUND $198.00 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $20.00 $5,779.90 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $5,779.90 Total $5,779.90 -3065- CITY OF MOUND Payments 12/01/16 9:17 AM Page 1 Invoice 2012971 11/212016 Cash Payment Current Period: December 2016 SUMP PUMP- SEWER DEPT r-'aLW Invoice 2111934 11/22016 Batch Name 120216CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $5,779.90 Cash Payment E 10145200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Payments Computer Dollar Amt $5,779.90 $209.44 Cash Payment $0.00 In Balance SAFETY BARRIER FENCE- PARKS Refer 1 CRAFTHOMESLLC _ 11/16/2016 Cash Payment G 101-23150 New Construction Escrow REFUND CONSTRUCTION ESCROW- 6100 $5,000.00 3/12016 SOUTHVIEW CT- BP #2016-00334- CRAFT $432.85 Refer HOMES LLC Invoice 120116 11/30/2016 E 10141310431 Meeting Expense Transaction Date 11/30/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,000.00 Refer 2 HOME DEPOT/GECF (PAN) _ Cash Payment E 10145200-220 Repair/Maint Supply TUBE FOR CONCRETE TO SET PARK $25.41 BENCH- BUY A BENCH Invoice 2012971 11/212016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply SUMP PUMP- SEWER DEPT $198.00 Invoice 2111934 11/22016 FUEL OIL MIX- CHAIN SAWS- FIRE DEPT $9.98 Cash Payment E 10145200-220 Repair/Maint Supply 6 MIL CLEAR POLY SHEETING, ORANGE $209.44 Cash Payment E 22242260-409 Other Equipment Repair SAFETY BARRIER FENCE- PARKS $5.99 Invoice 8050406 11/16/2016 Transaction Date 3/12016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $432.85 Refer 3 NAPA AUTO PARTS - SPRING PAR _ Cash Payment E 22242260409 Other Equipment Repair FUEL OIL MIX- CHAIN SAWS- FIRE DEPT $9.98 Invoice 001733 11/112016 Cash Payment E 22242260-409 Other Equipment Repair LIGHT RELAY FIRE VEHICLE #24 $5.99 Invoice 001.764 11/112016 Transaction Date 11/302016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.97 Refer 6ROTARY CLUB-MOUND-WESTONK Cash Payment E 10141310431 Meeting Expense 2016 ROTARY HOLIDAY LUNCHEON - E. $40.00 HOVERSTEN, R. HANSON Invoice 120116 12/12016 Cash Payment E 10141500431 Meeting Expense Invoice 120116 12/12016 Cash Payment E 10142400431 Meeting Expense Invoice 120116 12/12016 Cash Payment E 22242260431 Meeting Expense Invoice 120116 12/12016 Cash Payment E 60949750431 Meeting Expense 2016 ROTARY HOLIDAY LUNCHEON - C. $80.00 PAUSCHE, N. IVERSON, K. KELLY, M. MACKRES 2016 ROTARY HOLIDAY LUNCHEON - S. $40.00 SMITH, J. NORLANDER 2016 ROTARY HOLIDAY LUNCHEON - G. $40.00 PEDERSON, V. WEBER 2016 ROTARY HOLIDAY LUNCHEON - J. $20.00 COLOTTI Invoice 120116 12/12016 Transaction Date 12/12016 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 4 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) _ Total $220.00 Cash Payment E 10145200-220 Repair/Maint Supply BROWN LATEX ENAMEL PAINT FOR SKATE $24.08 PARK Invoice 136905 729/2016 Transaction Date 11/30/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 5 WAMTA, CITY OF -3064- Total $24.08 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies 8" HEAVY DUTY LINESMAN PLIERS- PARKS SHOP Invoice 139131 10r25/2016 Cash Payment E 10145200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 139160 10/26/2016 Cash Payment E602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 139221 10/28/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 139263 10/31/2016 Cash Payment E 28546388-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 139266 10/31/2016 Cash Payment E 285-46388-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 139268 10/31/2016 Cash Payment E 285-46388-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 139274 10/31/2016 100'16 GAUGE COIL GALVANIZED WIRE FOR TREES 80 CT LYSOL WIPES- PUB WKS Project 16-3 100 CT CLEAR X -MAS LIGHT SET- CITY STREETS TOILET BOWL CLEANER- PARKING DECK FORMULA 409 CLEANERS- PARKING DECK 14 KEYS PARKING DECK Transaction Date 11/28/2016 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $106.60 602 SEWER FUND $122.20 601 WATER FUND $60.94 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $279.00 285 MOUND HRA $63.77 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $736.68 101 GENERAL FUND $666.65 $2,035.84 Pre -Written Checks $2,035.84 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $2,035.84 -3063- 11/30/16 3:28 PM Page 4 $16.19 $5.39 $5.84 $287.28 $12.56 $14.36 $27.86 Total $527.90 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2016 11/30/16 3:28 PM Page 3 k 10/102016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies SCREWS,NUTS, BOLTS- FIRE DEPT $17.09 Invoice 138943 10/16/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 22242260-210 Operating Supplies DUCT SEAL LB COMP PLUG- EXTERIOR LED $9.88 Invoice 138951 10/172016 LIGHTS REPAIR E 101-45200.220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 139091 1022/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 54 PIECE DRIVER BIT SET, SCREWS, NUTS, $18.96 BOLTS Invoice 139129 10242016 Transaction Date 11282016 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $391.24 Refer 9 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PAS) Ck# 052478 11292016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies GALVANIZED CAP, TEFLON PASTE, SEAL TAPE Invoice 138727 10/72016 Project 16.3 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply 5 PK 6" RECIPROCATING BLADES Invoice 138781 10/102016 Project 163 Cash Payment E 101-41410-210 Operating Supplies 2 PK LITHIUM BATTERY- FOR CURBSIDE VOTING DEVICE- ELECTIONS Invoice 138685 10/52016 Cash Payment E 285-46388-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 138726 10/72016 Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 138782 10/102016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 138797 10/102016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 138800 10/102016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 138913 10/142016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 138951 10/172016 Cash Payment E 101-45200.220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 138972 10/182016 Cash Payment E 602-49450.210 Operating Supplies Invoice 139052 10212016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 139174 10262016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 139182 10272016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 138996 10/192016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 139031 10/202016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 139048 10212016 40 CT 30 GAL BLK TRASH BAGS- PARKING DECK 13W DOUBLE COMP FLUORESCENT BULBS. CENTENNIAL BLDG 4 OZ CEMENT WELD KIT CLAMPS 24" X 100' CHAR ALU SCREEN - STREETS 3 KEYS- NEW STREET EMPLOYEES GALLON MURIATIC ACID- STREETS GALVANIZED NIPPLE 8 COUPLING- PARKS DEPOT 12 OZ GLOSS BLACK ENAMEL SPRAY PAINT, SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS- PW Project 16-3 CHAIN SAW TOOL BOX- PARKS DOUBLE BOLT SNAP FOR TRUCK 31504 PARKS QUICK LINKS- SEWER DEPT 2 KEYS- NEW STREET EMPLOYEES GAL 50RV ANTIFREEZE BLEND- WATER DEPT -3062- $7.44 $16.19 $5.39 $8.99 $12.58 $5.39 $5.73 $5.97 $15.28 $7.72 $9.88 $8.09 $2.69 $27.14 $2.00 $17.94 CITY OF MOUND 11/30/16 3:28 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: November 2016 Transaction Date 11/28/2016 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $175.74 Refer 2 TOP COAT SEALCOA TING Ck# 052474 11/29/2016 Cash Payment E 401-43136-300 Professional Srvs SEALCOAT DRIVEWAY Q 3106 TUXEDO $279.00 BLVD- 2016 STREET IMPROV PROJ REPAIR. PW 16-02-A. WEIGMAN Invoice 3136 10/4/2016 Project PW1602 Transaction Date 11/28/2016 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $279.00 Refer 11 TREBIL, JESSE FOUNDATION Ck# 052475 11/29/2016 Cash Payment R 101-42000-34104 Plan Check Fee REFUND 50% PLAN REVIEW FEE BP# 2016- $38.91 01000- JOB CANCELLED- 5038 WOODLAND RD - J. TREBIL FOUNDATION CONTRACTOR Invoice 112916 11292016 Cash Payment R 101-42000-32210 Building Permits Invoice 112916 1129/2016 REFUND 80% BLDG PERMIT FEE BP# 2016. $95.76 01000- JOB CANCELLED- 5038 WOODLAND RD - J. TREBIL FOUNDATION CONTRACTOR Transaction Date 11292016 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $134.67 Refer- 5 TRUE VALUE HWS a Ck# 052476 11292016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SPARKLE CLEANER, DELIMER CLEANER, $76.80 TRASH BAGS- HWS Invoice 139055 10212016 Cash Payment E 609-49750409 Other Equipment Repair PERMATEX DRESSING FOR CONVEYOR $10.57 BELT Invoice 138899 10/142016 Cash Payment E 22242260401 Building Repairs Cash Payment E 60949750-210 Operating Supplies GE 6 PK 65W FLOOD LIGHTS- HWS $19.23 Invoice 138899 10/142016 Cash Payment E 22242260401 Building Repairs Transaction Date 11282016 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $106.60 Refer 6 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) Ck# 052477 11292016 E 22242260-210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 22242260-322 Postage FED EX SHIPPING- THERMAL IMAGE $17.61 Invoice 138867 10/122016 CAMERA FOR REPAIR- FIRE DEPT E 22242260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 138648 10/32016 Cash Payment E 22242260401 Building Repairs Invoice 138747 10/8/2016 Cash Payment E 10141930400 Repairs & Maintenance Invoice 138747 10/8/2016 Cash Payment E 22242260401 Building Repairs Invoice 138748 10/812016 Cash Payment E 22242260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 138775 10/92016 Cash Payment E 22242260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 138832 10/11/2016 Cash Payment E 22242260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 138867 10/122016 Cash Payment E 22242260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 138942 10/162016 CLEAR CAULK, SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS- $27.42 OUTSIDE LIGHTING PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG CLEAR CAULK, SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS- $27.43 OUTSIDE LIGHTING PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG K & B SEALANT- WHT BLDG WIRE- LIGHTS $40.46 ON BLDG SATIN ENAMEL PAINT, BRUSHES, TRAY- $94.08 FIRE DEPT 2" POLY & RUBBER SWIVEL CASTERS- FIRE $25.16 PREVENTION SPRAY HOUSE 9V BASIC SMOKE ALARM, RED $24.99 EXTINGUISHER SCREWS,NUTS, BOLTS- FIRE DEPT $88.16 -3061- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2016 Batch Name 112916CTYMAN Payment Computer Dollar Amt $2,035.84 Posted Refer _ 7 CARQUESTAUTO PARTS (FIRE) Ck# 052469 11/29/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair HI COUNT LEDS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 6974-282561 10/31/2016 11/30/16 3:28 PM Page 1 $21.39 Transaction Date 11/28/2016 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $21.39 Refer 8 CARQUEST OF IVA VARRE(P/W) Ck# 052470 11/29/2016 Refer Cash Payment E 101-43100.404 Machinery/Equip Repairs MINI BULB- LONG LIFE- 2014 FREIGHTLINER $8.38 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training #313- STREETS DEPT VEHICLE $140.10 Invoice 6974-281052 10/7/2016 VOLUNTEER CHIEF OFFICER SYMPOSIUM Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies OIL, AIR & FUEL FILTERS & LUBE- #304 $35.41 TYMCO STREET SWEEPER Invoice 6974-282417 10/28/2016 Cash Payment E602-49450-210 Operating Supplies OIL, AIR & FUEL FILTERS & LUBE- #1604 $35.41 STERLING SEWER DUMP TRUCK Invoice 6974-282417 10/282016 Cash Payment E 602-49450.210 Operating Supplies Invoice 6974-282439 10282016 Cash Payment E 101-45200.220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 6974-282698 1122016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Due 0 .....:.. ::1-__.____.__'_____' Refer 1 CHIDESTER, JAMES Cash Payment E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels 2002 CHEVY C 30 PICKUP #202 AIR FILTER $20.30 PARKS STIEGA BATTERY $81.06 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $180.56 Ck# 052471 11292016 FUEL REIMBURSEMENT- CITY VEHICLE- $43.00 MOUND SUPER AMERICA- PUMP ISSUE 11- 23-16- J. CHIDESTER Invoice 112916 1123/2016 Transaction Date 11/28/2016 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $43.00 Refer 3 PALM, GREG Ck# 052472 11292016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE -AIRFARE EXPENSE $140.10 VOLUNTEER CHIEF OFFICER SYMPOSIUM CONF 11-9 THRU 11-12-16- CLEARWATER FLORIDA- G. PALM Invoice 112916 11282016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE -MILEAGE TO AIRPORT $35.64 EXPENSE- VOLUNTEER CHIEF OFFICER SYMPOSIUM CONF 11-9 THRU 11-12-16- CLEARWATER FLORIDA- G. PALM Invoice 112916 11282016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $175.74 Refer 4PEDERSON, GREG Ck# 052473 11292016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE -AIRFARE EXPENSE $140.10 VOLUNTEER CHIEF OFFICER SYMPOSIUM CONF 11-9 THRU 11-12-16- CLEARWATER FLORIDA -G. PEDERSON Invoice 112916 11282016 Cash Payment E 222.42260.434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE -MILEAGE TO AIRPORT $35.64 EXPENSE- VOLUNTEER CHIEF OFFICER SYMPOSIUM CONF 11-9 THRU 11-12-16- CLEARWATER FLORIDA- G. PEDERSON Invoice 112916 1128/2016 -3060- CITY OF MOUND 1128/16 1:16 PM Page 5 Payments Current Period: November 2016 Cash Payment E 10141410-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Wells Fargo 10100 Total $166.25 $166.25 Refer 37 SWENSON, STEVE _ Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $76.00 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11/28/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 Refer .� 38 TILLMAN, ANNA Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 -ELECTION $147.25 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $147.25 Refer 39 TODD, MARY _ Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - HEAD $165.00 JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 110816 11/8/2016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $165.00 Refer 40 WEISS SMITH, GRETCHEN _ Cash Payment E 101-41410.300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $76.00 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/62016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 Refer 41 WILLIAMS, KRISTIE . Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - JUDGE & $104.50 TRAINING PAY Invoice 110816 11/8/2016 Transaction Date 11282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $104.50 w ~ Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $4,397.24 $4,397.24 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $4,397.24 Total $4,397.24 -3059- CITY OF MOUND 11/28/161:16 PM Page 4 Payments Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Refer 32 SHUKLE, CAROL Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 110816 11/82016 Cash Payment E 101-41410-430 Miscellaneous JUDGE PAY Wells Fargo 10100 Total Current Period: November 2016 GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - HEAD $160.00 JUDGE & TRAINING PAY 11282016 ELECTION JUDGE FOOD ALLOWANCE $50.00 REIMBURSEMENT- PRECINCT 2- BETHEL Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $142.50 E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - HEAD JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/8/2016 Invoice 110816 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $142.50 Refer 29 SANDERS, RODNEY _ Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - JUDGE & $104.50 CTR- S. STEWART- JUBILEE FOODS TRAINING PAY Invoice 110816 Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date Transaction Date 11282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $104.50 Refer 30 SCHURMAN, RITA _ Cash Payment Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - JUDGE & $104.50 TRAINING PAY TRAINING PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $104.50 Refer 31 SCHWALBE, VERNON� Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $142.50 Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Refer 32 SHUKLE, CAROL Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 110816 11/82016 Cash Payment E 101-41410-430 Miscellaneous JUDGE PAY Wells Fargo 10100 Total $142.50 GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - HEAD $160.00 JUDGE & TRAINING PAY 11282016 ELECTION JUDGE FOOD ALLOWANCE $50.00 REIMBURSEMENT- PRECINCT 2- BETHEL 33 SIMON, STEWART CHURCH- C. SHUKLE- CUB & DOMINOS Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Transaction Date 11282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $210.00 Refer 33 SIMON, STEWART _ Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - HEAD $165.00 JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Cash Payment E 101-41410-430 Miscellaneous ELECTION JUDGE FOOD ALLOWANCE $25.36 REIMBURSEMENT- PRECINCT 4- GILLESPIE CTR- S. STEWART- JUBILEE FOODS Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $190.36 Refer 34 SING -LYNCH, LUANN _ Cash Payment E 101-4141D-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - JUDGE & $104.50 TRAINING PAY Invoice 110816 11/8/2016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Refer 35 SKARET, PATTY Cash Payment E 101-41410.300 Professional Srvs Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Refer A 36 STARR. NANCY Wells Fargo 10100 Total $104.50 GENERAL ELECTION 11.08-16 - ELECTION $76.00 JUDGE PAY Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 -3058- CITY OF MOUND 1128/161:16 PM Page 3 Payments Invoice 110816 Transaction Date Refer ~~� Cash Payment 11/82016 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.50 21 MILTICH, STEPHENA. _ E 10141410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $66.50 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.50 Refer 22 MURPHY, KATHLEEN _ Cash Payment E 10141410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $66.50 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 Current Period: November 2016 Transaction Date 11282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.50 Refer 23 MURPHY, SCOTTA Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 Refer ._ 19 MELSNESS, LARRY Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $76.00 JUDGE PAY Wells Fargo 10100 Total Invoice 110816 11/82016 24 PHILLIPS MARYLAINE Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 Refer 20 MEYER, PETER C. _ JUDGE PAY Cash Payment E 10141410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $66.50 Transaction Date JUDGE PAY Wells Fargo 10100 Total Invoice 110816 Transaction Date Refer ~~� Cash Payment 11/82016 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.50 21 MILTICH, STEPHENA. _ E 10141410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $66.50 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.50 Refer 22 MURPHY, KATHLEEN _ Cash Payment E 10141410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $66.50 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.50 Refer 23 MURPHY, SCOTTA _ Cash Payment E 10141410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $76.00 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 Refer 24 PHILLIPS MARYLAINE Cash Payment E 10141410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $142.50 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $142.50 Refer 25 REUPER, JAMES _ Cash Payment E 10141410,300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $80.75 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.75 Refer 26 RICE, DAVID _ Cash Payment E 10141410,300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $76.00 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 Refer 27 ROBBINS, JACQUELINE _ Cash Payment E 10141410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $142.50 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/8/2016 Transaction Date 1128/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $142.50 28 ROCKWELL, DORIS -Refer — 3057- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2016 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 110816 11/8/2016 Transaction Date 11282016 Refer 10 GARRISON, JENIFER Cash Payment E 10141410.300 Professional Srvs Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Refer 11 HENDLEY, RON _ Cash Payment E 101.41410.300 Professional Srvs Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Refer 12 HEYSTEK, HENRI Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Refer 13 JOHANSEN, KEVIN Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Refer 14 KOHLS, PATRICIA Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION JUDGE PAY 11/28116 1:16 PM Page 2 $66.50 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.50 GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $76.00 JUDGE PAY Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $80.75 JUDGE PAY Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.75 GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 -ELECTION $137.75 JUDGE PAY 16 LINKERT GEORGE Wells Fargo 10100 Total $137.75 GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 -ELECTION $66.50 JUDGE PAY Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.50 GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $80.75 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo Refer 15 LIBKE ROBERT 10100 Total $80.75 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $80.75 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.75 Refer 16 LINKERT GEORGE _ Cash Payment E 101.41410.300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - JUDGE & $171.00 TRAINING PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $171.00 Refer v y 17 MCKENZIE, MARY D _ Cash Payment E 101-41410300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $76.00. Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Refer 18 MCKENZIE, SCOT Cash Payment E 101.41410-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 110816 11/82016 JUDGE PAY Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $76.00 JUDGE PAY -3056- CITY OF MOUND 11/28/161:16 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: November 2016 Batch Name 2016GENELECT User Dollar Amt $4,397.24 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $4,397.24 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ANDERSON, DOUG Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16- HEAD $160.00 JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 110816 11/8/2016 Cash Payment E 101-41410430 Miscellaneous ELECTION JUDGE FOOD ALLOWANCE $50.00 Refer 8 EPPLE, EVAN REIMBURSEMENT- PRECINCT 1- MT. OLIVE Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs CHURCH- D. ANDERSON- COSTCO $83.13 Invoice 110816 11/8/2016 TRAINING PAY Transaction Date 11/28/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $210.00 Refer 2 ANDERSON, SUSAN 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - JUDGE & $95.00 TRAINING PAY Invoice 110616 11/8/2016 Transaction Date 11/26/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.00 Refer 3 BATINICH, ROBERTA J. Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08.16 - ELECTION $66.50 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/8/2016 Transaction Date 11/28/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.50 Refer 4 CAMPBELL, REBECCA _ Cash Payment E 10141410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $142.50 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/8/2016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $142.50 Refer 5 CHRISTOPHERSEN, JANET Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $76.00 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 Refer 6 DASCHER, SHARON _ Cash Payment E 10141410.300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - ELECTION $66.50 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/8/2016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.50 Refer 7 DOEPNER-HOVE, STACY _ Cash Payment E 10141410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 -ELECTION $142.50 JUDGE PAY Invoice 110816 11/82016 Transaction Date 11282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $142.50 Refer 8 EPPLE, EVAN _ Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-08-16 - JUDGE & $83.13 TRAINING PAY Invoice 110816 11/8/2016 Transaction Date 11/282016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $83.13 Refer__ 9 ERICKSON, GINNY _ -3055- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2016 Batch Name 111816CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $7,057.55 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $7,057.55 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $7,057.55 Total $7,057.55 -3054- 11/23/16 1:42 PM Page t $6,985.00 $6,985.00 $72.55 $72.55 $0.00 In Balance Refer 3 CENTURY FENCE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 285-46388-400 Repairs & Maintenance FURNISH & INSTALL PARKING RAMP PANELS Invoice 168512701 10/31/2016 Transaction Date 11/4/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 14 GARY S DIESEL SERVICE Cash Payment E 101-43100404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BRAKE CHAMBER & CLEVIS KIT- TANDEM STREETS VEHICLE #605 Invoice 1-37924 10/31/2016 Transaction Date 11/14/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $72.55 285 MOUND HRA $6,985.00 $7,057.55 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $7,057.55 Total $7,057.55 -3054- 11/23/16 1:42 PM Page t $6,985.00 $6,985.00 $72.55 $72.55 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: December 7, 2016 PLANNING CASE NO. 16-41 SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision APPLICANT: Brian Benson LOCATION: 6385 Bay Ridge Road (PID No. 23-117-24-33-0023) MEETING DATE: December 13, 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential REQUEST AND BACKGROUND At its December 13th meeting, the City Council will review the application from Brian Benson who is requesting approval of a 2 -lot minor subdivision of the property at 6385 Bay Ridge Road. The 50,707 foot property, which fronts Bay Ridge Road (cul-de-sac) on the north side and Lake Minnetonka on the south side, includes an existing single family home and a detached garage. The existing house, which straddles the proposed new lot line between proposed Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, and the existing detached garage are being demolished to allow for the construction of two, new single family homes. The proposed minor subdivision does not require any variances. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their December 6th meeting. Chuck Alcon , who represents the owner, Brian Benson, was present at the meeting. Mr. Benson was also present. No other persons present at the meeting commented on the proposed minor subdivision. The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommended approval of the minor subdivision application, as recommended by Staff. Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendations for approval, a resolution has been prepared for City Council consideration. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed notice on December 7, 2016 to inform them that the minor subdivision application was being included on the consent agenda for the December 13, 2016 City Council meeting for action. -3145- In an effort to bring more transparency to the unjustified fee increases being taken by the owners of broadcast and sports television channels, Mediacom previously introduced a Local Broadcast Surcharge and a Regional Sports Surcharge. By identifying the cumulative fee increases being taken by these channel owners, we hope to draw the attention of consumers and their elected representatives to this rapidly escalating problem. Despite the challenges we face, Mediacom has continued to aggressively invest in the communities we serve. As part of a 3 -year, $1 billion capital investment plan announced early this year, Mediacom has been aggressively installing the newest generation of broadband technology throughout its entire internet service territory. By year end, virtually all of the 3 million homes and businesses within the 1,500 communities that Mediacom serves across its 22 state footprint will be upgraded to the latest DOCSIS 3.1 "Gigasphere" platform. In doing so, Mediacom will be first major cable company in the United States to fully transition to the DOCSIS 3.1 network infrastructure. As part of these network upgrades, Mediacom will be making major speed and/or data allowance enhancements to many of our most popular internet services tiers.2 The below table summarizes the changes to our internet service tiers: Current Speed (Up/Down) Current Retail Price Current Data Allowance New Speed (Up/Down) I New Retail Price New Data Allowance 3Mb s/512kb s $29.95 150GB 60M bs/5Mb s $34.99 150GB 15Mb s/1Mb s $49.95 25OGB 60M bs/5Mb s J$54.99 250GB 50Mb s/5Mb s $59.95 350GB 60M bs/5Mb s $69.99 40OGB 100Mb s/10Mb s $79.95 999GB 100Mb s/10Mb s $79.99 1000GB 150Mb s/20Mb s $99.99 2000GB 200Mb s/20Mb s $99.99 2000GB In addition, Mediacom will be announcing the availability of our new Gigasphere powered 1 -Gig service tier in your market in 2017. More details to follow. Mediacom appreciates the opportunity to continue to serve your community's telecommunications needs. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (507) 837-4878 or email at tsunde@mediacomcc.com Sincerely, Theresa Sund 2 Moving forward, Mediacom will be moving all its 3 Mbps/512kbps, 15Mbps/3Mbps and 50Mbps/5Mbps internet service customers to a service speed of 60Mbps/5Mbps. The distinguishing feature between these service levels moving forward will be a data allowance of 150GB, 91 r 400GB. The entry level internet service tier offered to new customers moving forward will be 60Mbps/SMb`arl4mclude a 400GB data allowance. Theresa Sunde Senior Manager, Government Relations Via Certified Mail December 2, 2016 Dear Mound Community Official: The purpose of this letter is to inform you that, on or about January 3, 2016, Mediacom will be implementing the following rate adjustments:' Product: New Rate: Net Change: Local Broadcast Station Surcharge $8.09 $1.62 Regional Sports Surcharge $3.73 $0.76 Family TV $74.95 $2.00 The decision to make price adjustments is always a difficult one. We are very reluctant to raise video prices because, when we do, we lose subscribers. However, cable and satellite companies are constantly being pressured by the programmers we buy from to pay more for the channels we carry. The fees we pay to retransmit local broadcast stations like ABC, CBS, FOX and NBC are by far our fastest growing programming cost component. A recently issued Federal Communications Commission pricing survey revealed that the monthly per subscriber fee per broadcast station rose 43% between 2013 and 2014. All told, the fees charged by broadcasters, according to SNL Kagan, grew from $800 million to $7.7 billion annually or 863% between 2009 and 2016. The problems with sports programming are equally as alarming. One look at the skyrocketing rights fees announced with recent deals and it is easy to see that the marketplace for live televised sports is out of control. Broadcast networks and national and regional sports networks are shelling out billions of dollars for the rights to carry pro sports like the NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL, the Olympic Games, World Cup and NCAA football and basketball games. Unrestrained spending has become the hallmark of the sports programming business, and the American consumer, whether a sports fan or not, is left to pay the price. 1 Depending on the terns of their contract, certain customers on promotional rates mayor may not receive this rate change at this time. Mediacom Commur,i—tions Corporation 1504 2nd Street SE, PO Bo 32153, -Waseca, Minnesota 56093 Metropolitan District 2016 Activity Summary — Mound Service Summary Larval Sites Inspected = 329 Larval Mosquito Treatments = 5 63. 10 acres Adult Mosquito Treatments = 121.23 acres Customer Calls = 13 Catch Basins Treatments = 370 Tires Removed = 0 '. •1 Sorbo Park -3212- OMPI amm NTROL DISTRICT Metro Counties Government Center 2099 University Avenue West Saint Paul, MN 55104-3431 Mound City Manager Mr. Eric Hoversten 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Hoversten, Website: www.mmcd.org Phone: 651-645-9149 FAX: 651-645-3246 TTY use Minnesota Relay Service November, 2016 Enclosed is a summary of work done by the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (MMCD) in the city of Mound area during the 2016 mosquito control season. 2016 was the third year of higher than typical precipitation which resulted in record levels of service provided to District citizens by MMCD. Precipitation was about average through June. Precipitation increased in July and continued through August and September. The more typical dry period did not occur in 2016. This resulted in high levels of mosquito production. We treated the majority of our overall 320,000 acres between late April and mid September. In 2016 the Minnesota Department of Health reported 46 human West Nile virus (WNV) illnesses; ten of those cases were reported in people who live within our District. No cases of La Crosse encephalitis were reported in residents of the state. MMCD employees continued to monitor and control populations of mosquitoes capable of transmitting disease right up until we received our first frost this fall. MMCD employees also controlled immature black flies in small steams and large rivers throughout the metropolitan area. These treatments have resulted in significantly fewer adult black flies when compared to a time before we conducted treatments. MMCD staff also continued to monitor the distribution of ticks capable of transmitting disease, and worked with the Minnesota Department of Health to provide information designed to reduce the risk of tick transmitted diseases. If you have any questions, or would like to meet to discuss our agency's activities within Mound, please contact me. iteph A. Manweiler, Executive Director Pho e: (651) 643-8365 Email: mmcd_sam@mmcd.org -3211- Planning Commission Minutes November 15, 2016 • Several land use applications under review • December 6th agenda has applicant interviews • Council conducted a workshop with staff for proposed changes to exterior storage, nuisance, and other minor changes to code • Tree lighting is November 22 ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Penner, second by Goode, to adjourn at 8:14 pm. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander -3210- Planning Commission Minutes November 15, 2016 Penner asked about hardcover. Smith believes that the applicant indicated it would conform to the 40% requirement after site/landscaping alterations were complete. Smieja questioned condition 8, referring to exterior units. Smith said, according to the 2 -foot setback for mechanical units per code and due to the proximity of the proposed structure, applicant is advised that no mechanical its (i.e., air conditioning units) can be placed on that side. Smieja noted that, in condition 10, the City was not responsible for facade damage caused by normal maintenance. What happens with a new owner? Smith replied that it will be filed against the title and any future owners would be aware of the variance. Scott Bazewicz, 1920 Lakeside Lane, restated that the path down to lake will be eliminated to maintain the hardcover below 40%. Bazewicz also showed a diagram of the cars fitting into the garage and how the side loaded garage would not work. Smieja asked about the gutter line. Bazewicz indicates that they will alter it however it needs to be. Smieja expressed concerned about the proximity to the road, especially regarding backup visibility and children darting out of the garage. Beatrice Amidon, 1909 Lakeside Lane, was concerned about closeness of the garage to her fence. Discussion took place about the fence including the updated survey dated October 31, 2016 which shows a fence on the applicant's side of the shared property line. Ms. Amidon showed a survey on the overhead and indicated that a fence for her property was installed with a permit and was to be 1 -foot on her side of the line. Staff confirmed that the proposed addition would be 1.4 feet from the property line MOTION by Baker, second by Goode, to recommend approval of the variance with staff recommendations 1-16 and findings of fact 1-7. MOTION carried. Voting for: Baker, Bergquist, David, and Penner; Voting against Smieja In voting against, Smieja stated that he has concerns about the closeness of the garage to the road and safety concerns as well the proximity of the garage to the shared side lot line. Old/New Business Staff/Council Liaison Report / Projects Update Smith outlined the following: ® Planning Commissioner Jeff Bergquist was elected to City Council ® Serenity will submit new drawings for screening, etc. before the public hear with Council • IKM construction has started — closing early next week -3209- Planning Commission Minutes November 15, 2016 A public lands permit is requested to address the removal of the existing deck, which extends into Devon Commons. In addition, location of the deck will most likely require some construction within Devon Commons. Kelvin Retterath, 2618 Grove Lane, thought that Rita covered everything. Retterath restated the public lands permit detail and said that this is as big a house and can fit on the property. MOTION by Goode, second by Bergquist, to recommend approval of the expansion permit subject to conditions and findings of fact as identified by staff. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Smieja, second by Baker, to recommend approval of the Public Lands Permit subject to staff conditions with correction of condition 2 and findings of fact as identified by staff. MOTION passed unanimously. Variance PC Case No. 16-36 1920 Lakeside Lane Attached Garage Addition Applicant: Scott Bazewicz Smith introduced the variance. The applicant is requesting approval to allow the construction of an attached garage addition on the west and north sides of the existing house. The addition would provide space to accommodate 2 vehicles and storage. There ae existing nonconforming conditions on the west side of the house. The detached structures are being removed and replaced with the garage addition project. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a front setback of 3.6 feet and a side setback of 1.4 feet. The proposed addition would replace 2 existing detached structures located on the west side of the house. Hardcover is anticipated to increase by 95 square feet, which puts the property at 41.24 percent; however, driveway and landscaping modifications will reduce hardcover to within required levels. Due to the proximity of the addition to the lot lines on the west/north sides of the house, the applicant has been made aware of building/fire code regulations related to fire rating/openings/projections for structures within certain distances. Baker questioned the difference of the proposed addition and the existing accessory structures. Smith demonstrated the measurements. Bergquist confirmed that the accessory buildings on the site will be removed. Smith agreed. Smieja asked about the regulations for accessory structures on lakeside. Smith stated that the setback is 50 feet from the ordinary high water mark and that it applies to structures that are under the 200 square feet as well. Smieja referred to Hoversten's notes regarding "truing up the drip lines" and requested clarification. Smith stated that Hoversten doesn't see a significant difference to what's on the site today; just adding more bulk. -3208- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 15, 2016 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Jeffrey Bergquist, David Goode, and Jameson Smieja. Members absent: Doug Gawtry and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Scott Bazewicz, 1920 Lakeside La; Beatrice Amidon, 1909 Lakeside La; Kelvin Retterath, 2618 Grove La; Don Goodwin, 4941 Island View Dr; Scott Gates, 1920 Lakeside La APPROVAL Of MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Smieja, second by Goode, to approve the agenda as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW AND ACTION ON OCTOBER 4 2016 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Baker, second by Smieja, to approve the October 4, 2016 meeting minutes as written. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW AND ACTION TO TABLE OCTOBER 18 2016 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Smieja, second by Goode, to table review of the October 18, 2016 meeting minutes to the December 6, 2016 meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS Expansion Permit PC Case No. 16-37 and Public Lands Permit 4941 Island View Drive New/replacement house and deck Applicant: Kelvin Retterath (on behalf of owners Don and Roxanne Goodwin) Rita Trapp introduced the request. The applicant has requested an expansion permit and public lands permit for replacement of the home and deck. Their existing lot of record is a Lakeshore lot located on a cul-de-sac. The 4,150 square foot lot is smaller than the minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. An expansion permit is requested as the applicant would like to maintain the east setback at 4 feet instead of the required 6 feet. The wood landing and proposed lakeside deck will be in the setback area. -3207- Smith thought it was reasonable for the parties to get together to come up with a screening plan. They could also address hours of operation, approved day use, and other issues. Andersen is open to working with them. He will work on a design for a screen wall, landscaping, take off the at -grade patio, and put a wall on the westerly side. Andersen stated that they have to build the structure to maintain a lakeside amenity. Chair Penner reopened the Public Hearing Heystek asked for detail on the dock. Andersen explained that it was a day dock only anticipating on one pontoon on the dock. Rockvam proposes to bring a boat over with a driver for specific activities. No permanent dockage is planned. It will be limited to 1 watercraft and no overnight docking. There will be a 24 hour management service to call with any issues. Rita Hughes expressed her appreciation for all the work you have done and are doing. They would like to get together to see our concerns. Chair Penner closed the public hearing MOTION by Goode, second by Baker, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat with conditions 1-15 and findings of fact 1-3 as outlined by staff. MOTION passed unanimously. MOTION by Smieja, second by Goode, to recommend an additional condition (number 9) to the approval of the Conditional Use Permit to provide dense and mature screening to residential properties on the northerly east and southerly west sides of Tract 5. MOTION passed unanimously. MOTION by Smieja, second by Baker, to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit with conditions 1-9 and findings of fact 1-6. MOTION passed unanimously. MOTION by Goode, second by Smieja, to recommend approval of the variances with conditions 1-3 and findings of fact 1-9 as outlined by staff. MOTION passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Penner, second by Peterson, to adjourn at 9:30 pm. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander -3206- Andersen would be willing to change the lower patio area to grass to discourage congregating in that area. Rita Hughes (6641 Halsted Ave) is concerned about people looking in their windows. A fence issue from 2012 was addressed poorly by the owner of the property but resolved by their legal counsel. Hank Heystek (6501 Bayridge Rd) enjoys his lake view and solitude. He is concerned about the increased density with residents and cars and its impact on CR 110 traffic; also, Indian burial grounds and the impact on existing sewer and water line capacities. Rita Hughes stated that, 60 year olds don't party but they have children and grandchildren. Smieja asked about the sewer and water aspects. Smith said that utility plans were referred to Director of Public Works and Public Works Superintendent and City Engineer. Any upgrading necessary to these services will be born by the developer. Chair Penner closed the public hearing Baker said that his biggest concern were the variances, especially the east side setback and taking into consideration the retaining wall and landscaping; secondly, the size of beach house. (Smith confirmed that the beach house scaled at 2400 SF.) Peterson stated that the developer is doing a lot to accommodate with landscaping. Smieja thought that 2400 SF was a compromise but it's off -set by being 110 feet from the lake and behind the neighbor's house. Smieja shares the same concerns with the east setback variance and thought it could be minimized. He can't visualize the retaining wall. Smieja thought that they should maximize the variance on west side and minimize the variance on the east. Andersen said that the biggest issue in the shifting of the building to the west is meeting the ADA requirements of the egress and accessibility of Building F. Smieja felt that the rooftop patio was a reasonable use. The regulations should address number of people, kind of noise, etc. The ordinances are in place to protect people and the commission should address this overall. Goode noted that the adjacent neighbors are concerned about the rooftop patio users could see into their house. Using the patio below instead of roof patio could alleviate that issue. Andersen stated that the CIC documents will secure the use requirements. According to code, he could make the building two enclosed stories. This is smaller and less impactful. -3205- Baker asked if there was a reason not to shift the building to the west. Andersen said they attempted that but it didn't work due to drive aisles, parking, and ability to get enough natural landscape. This is the best placing for Mound code. Andersen also stated that there will be no easement needed for building the wall because it's all on the development property. Massive amounts of dirt are being moved to lower the building to minimize building impact. Baker questioned about lowering the building 12 feet and the wall height. Andersen said that some are a bit over 12; towards lake it gets less. Peterson asked about parking at the beach house. Andersen replied that there was no parking allowed by the beach house. Residents would be using bikes and golf carts. The goal is to minimize heights. Landscape plans are not done yet. Fence on the west side of the beach house will be incorporated into the landscape to make it look natural. Baker asked if it would be possible to shift Bldg F west. Andersen said they tried turning the building but it didn't work with road elevations and emergency access along Bartlett Boulevard. Smieja wanted clarification of the date of the drawings Smith restated his concern and explained that we want the drawings considered by the commission to be the same that are considered by the council. Smieja was concerned about the height of the wail on the east. Baker asked if the decks on the four corners of the building extend past the wall. Andersen said that the decks follow the soffit line. Andersen said that they are about 95% finished on the final drawings. Baker wondered if the 12 foot retaining wall required a fence on top. Andersen said it is not required but they do it because it scares him. It is integrated in the top course of the wall and architecturally ties into the building design. John Hughes (1694 Bellum Cir, Long Lake) was concerned about the size of the beach house. There will be no serenity for his parents. Hughes figures that there could be potentially 180 people congregating at the beach house. The "no parking" needs to be firmly established. Andersen said that every neighbor will have a copy of the CIC documents and no parking will be a mandate. Andersen believes that most of the outdoor use will be adjacent to Bartlett at the pool and athletic activities. Peterson asked if Andersen had other locations in the Twin Cities for people to look at. Andersen said there are other locations that are not his. This development is unique because our buyer is the snowbird. The amenity package is very important. The pod design does not exist. Terry Hughes (6641 Halsted Ave) stated that their dining area is on the east side. Hughes would like to see the building moved north towards the road. -3204- Smith indicated that this is a shoreland PDA area that requires the project area be divided into tiers for the purposes of evaluating density. The proposed impervious surface and open space both meet the requirements of the city code. The proposed development will have to meet all shoreland erosion control and stormwater management standards. Goode asked about the parking situation for recreational building. Smith believes it to be more as a walking area but will defer a definite answer to Mr. Andersen. Smieja noted that there was a recommendation for an easement and/or shared access agreement. How does that work and who does that? Smith said it could be done as part of the plat or a condition on the CUP, but what instrument or document form it might take is uncertain. It may be in multiple areas, i.e., the CUP, plat development agreement, etc. We want the Minnetrista/Mound projects to stay together and that amenities on the Minnetrista side remain available for those on the Mound side in perpetuity. The simplest way is if we can get it on a plat. Smieja noted that the final plat is in both communities; could that change? Smith thinks the plat will be combined with signatures from both communities. The goal is consistency. Smieja noted the reference to hardcover and pervious pavers. Is the proposed hardcover percentage a combination? Smith said that the bottom line is that it has to be under 30%. Smith believes there are some pervious paver figures in the proposed. Smieja said that Faulkner referenced easement for retaining wall on east property line. Has it happened yet? Smith thinks not. Smieja said that the east property line shows elevation changes from the east abutting property to the Mound property. Is the more information? Mr. Andersen will address this. Smieja asked staff to restate the conditions for rezoning that the council approved. Smith said that the rezoning will not take place until final plat is approved. They wanted to be sure that this project and the rezoning were tied together. Smith reviewed the historical aerial photos. Smieja asked about the variances on the east and west side and inquired if the variance on the west side going to be a moot point when the final plat is all said and done? Smith said that there is a corporate boundary with a property line; therefore, a setback. Smieja asked if there could there be a crossover where the building crosses the line? Smith thought that it could but it is cleaner this way. Developer Dan Andersen, (3540 Montgomerie Ave, Deephaven) related that it's a developer's nightmare to allow buildings to crossover community boundaries. It affects mail delivery, taxes, deed recording, etc. It is not our intention to allow that to happen. -3203- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 18, 2016 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, David Goode, Jameson Smieja, and Jennifer Peterson. Members absent: Doug Gawtry and Jeffrey Bergquist. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Edward J. Molitor, 6639 Bartlett Blvd; John Hughes, 1694 Bellum Cir, Long Lake; Daniel Andersen, 3540 Montgomerie Ave, Deephaven; Barry Dorniden, 350 Highway 10 S, St Cloud; Terry & Rita Hughes, 6641 Halstead Ave; Hank Heystek, 6501 Bayridge Rd. BOARD OF APPEALS Serenity Hill on Halsted Bay 6639 Bartlett Boulevard Public Hearing — Preliminary Plat -Major Subdivision (Case No. 16-27) Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 16-25) Variances (Case No. 16-26) D.J. Andersen Design Group and Winsted Investments LLC Chair Penner opened the Public Hearing Smith introduced the Serenity Hill on Halsted Bay project and related applications. It was related that the rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment was addressed and previously approved. Approvals being requested by the applicant include preliminary plat, a conditional use permit for a Shoreland Planned Development Area (PDA) and to building multi -family housing with more than six units, multiple variances, and a final plat (to be addressed by the council at'a future meeting). As part of the PDA, the following variances are requested: side yard setbacks on the east and west for the condominium (Building F); parking variance to allow spaces on the Minnetrista property to meet Mound parking requirements; building size of an accessory structure; variance to undertake site and construction activities in a bluff, building height variance for Building F; and variance to allow use of alternate driveway/trail surface materials. Building F has 10 units and is located on the Mound portion of the project. There is also a "beach house" located closer to the lake on the Mound parcel. The remaining five 12 -unit buildings are located in Minnetrista. Smith outlined the review procedures, public hearing requirements and related timelines as well as an overview of the requested variances, parking and sidewalks, building materials, landscaping, refuse handling, and stormwater management. -3202- N E w m a g m � N N a c e NN C d jF� c Ew e o mr LL 0 J r d D N m M F, J t d d J LL J m> Y E d C m O� QQ Of S N 'U d U b Q LL Y d N N O C d T N K o Mz50 s c�r LL�n` c n w ut° i-0 � O K m o .d.. -32 o o> Zat�`.� =Qom01-u�== w 0 C7 O ' Ocpm�OOJON� ' rn O r" rn V N NO m V t0 m UJ O) m W N N N o m m r r m r rn r <o O c! rn a M w v m o o V N m M N N pp V ' O N O ' I r V (O rn N O W N O N M v�- N t W of r N d m N tp (O 'i N m rn b OJ � V N (O O (O w O� m m V M N W M r W (O r O) M W M N r m (00 CJ < N rnoo rn m mo N r o min .n oIn m m m �o< ro.- �n rnrn a om �<o fo r O ori of v ri n o m r v o ori o O N N c0. V V r W W me-t0N 00 V OOO�ON�N rn V O .-M ' r �-Nrn O m O V_ V O O r"< rn r �O O W O] m_ (p V N'5 C6M rn (O M 'O N � (p N O �- o> N OJ O (O M V N 7 (p N O M m 0 0 0 o e e e a e a c o o a o a o a o 0 0 0 o d �C M r m fb 'Or r N rn'O OJ 01 V W� OM—M O N M F p N N !' O M r� N O r C W O N M O w M N O w N . M z W . m O rn �O N N M M r O O aJ N m M pJ W,1 O N v v 'UO''001 �'Crmr.-N 1O NO)t0 W W N W rn W 0 Mu � V aw Y m'n V NMOL V mmr V M M NO V cOrnr�-O tOY W m W M m r V O of oc r W o ('J W m of M O V (O o o M n O P 0 N t0 a f0 O V A N O= to W M V U <d� v�o co co o.i r of o of o mco o co rco r oir oiv Z Q r�V fpr �M rnO V �-v Q i W 7 N r m V O r O 0) (D !� m N W t0 V h r h M V p Z rn N Qf M rn 10 N (O O W O w r' �U O N N m M (O F' Y j O �- N�- m N M N O N r n a � c N Z w Z KfD ' OtOM mMON ' O) tp r " rn V NNm m O M LL M rn of N W r O 10 r W l0 —O Q m r rn b rnrn tp V YOM Z W N Mo o"— O M M O N (O O O, MZ Z N N m N N NN W F yLLom m O U) W V N 'll O r O O O O O O N O O N O N 0 0 0 Z F V N O V V O O O O O LL') OJ O! O m m �- V O r O w w W t0 M O I� VI �� r tO r C N O V M uJ Oi N N �N'O VON m h r Op N V N OI N MO)O)O ��O N w c6 N E w m a g m � N N a c e NN C d jF� c Ew e o mr LL 0 J r d D N m M F, J t d d J LL J m> Y E d C m O� QQ Of S N 'U d U b Q LL Y d N N O C d T N K o Mz50 s c�r LL�n` c n w ut° i-0 � O K m o .d.. -32 o o> Zat�`.� =Qom01-u�== w 0 C7 O mM M mMMO O V N (0 V (0 (O OnM'O O V C mnN F m O N N hmmmt0 .-O M O N'- N M' -N N OOmOm m UJ t0 � ONh�-�-mNM MO N NORM n Mn V OtnrN�- N M V M O M" t O N N n M 0 mm n 0 m V O V O M (D O M M V V M m M M M M M N O N n 1p M t0 m m t0 M t0 V N M N N�-N MtnM M V N M ui MrS^ m r V V M M M N ^ ^ N u7 N r N ' (0 t0 .- ' N NM r0 N M mNtOnmM OOMMtIJM ' ' m ooaN N -y a m (w M a n n M M V O M O a V M M V IZ �M O NN N N V N m n n n v m lo: (Q M S V M C6 C6 My OO OM V MOS < L'i N ' mn r0 ' nMmMOuI NM ' n ' M ON V O M � illM N V ONM N MN t0 Mnn OO n t0 i0 M N N MhLLJmM O oM NmmMtO M M M M'O V nOMOn O t0 n O MOON n N V M MmMmM 7 m N M mM NCi V V MM(0 Of m NSM m x(00 tMV 0 t0m W N M mN(0O M(0 V M V (O MOn(OmM^mm O mM V C C C C Cn mnm w.m m V M Z W O NN V (0 0)O (hMOM NN�-N Mc M 1� n V N w (V M(O 0)N M W O M V n'OMmM n nn OOMMM MON M M V r0 n mnn(0 (D U Z K W wa aW d MON V V V n O m�(h (OMmNOnM m V oto '[1 W ON W VR M m O OomMO IM1N mM V O V V MMN(0 M V t0N m '0N - Nt0 n" a W O O M V M'O M mNMmN N OMN m h fDm V -M-W- MN f N Mm J U t0N f� MfD �-amOC vNmNNNM W— V fO M�-N n S iz W MN W $ M V 'O MSN t0 (O m tp �-N N�NMm V V V O O v m Q b % C U C t0 n V M n f0 N M m N N N M M N n (yj NtOM (pNM OnnN n nOm (0MO V MMM V Ml0 vo-w V mm W- 0 M vma'o dN(droNaoM o -cc (+i MMNm vmww. M O Z M M m n V 'O M M N M O O M lD M O N m n M M M V VN 1-w Me- M M M V V b n� M o O V �-M N i s a N N W 0 Z 0 t0 ' MMM NM O W VV O -WO N' wvM W O V m M r r r r avO m V V m M � M m M M O 1- M C N l0 V l0 t0 f0 n M r0 O V n m a N d Ow m O N N LQ amm IM 10 MNm Orn �- N �M-N NOOmOm O W M N N m M N Oto r m N M M O O! N o r M r M n V ZX- UWZ J a WNV 0 N U W O- W OC3 0 m0 0 m O V On 00000 (O V NN0000 00 V NO (OrM�nN 500 O h N N 0 0 (OO V m N t00 Oop 0 0 N O N N lOD m< NONON-Mm<OMOO ON(666M 06(d Z M VM W MN W U' V (0 V m V V ("l ON O N [D •- V M N N X :3 W m N N O C C U w o ?+ G N N U U o z y a >N N Z N p) 4 ccs' E a>mF m N c E m y c E- 0 c v vY E a c Fa-- z0aiiwLLa�c>�ciawa na"$�i3200 W 0 d� wiDON Mw h n OMN O M O �- r N w w n r r N d O d YJ fO N d W O w r d M N fp N O d w � M w O r N d w a,6 O `N r d YJ d d w M OJ In o r l0 m o w r n N w N (O M N M w W d �- f0 w�w O M d d w M 1a M NO' iO�d�dNM �wNNdrN�-N rd "'Y'1vN M vwi HON d N d m O�OO d d w r wIQ V m tmhwO on O w°W mm� ono .-ooM w �nw m d r v Mn�ornd r wM r W M aim of o oi.=ado dwro oai ��o ri �ri ri of t Mw d wrn rn d� dNwod �dv�.-� u�w d w (D c' O N N N M r O O H O d N M d w w h w d d lD M 10 M N 1O w wwdN`o-'Od C5 nwM .oW- (0D1 NfD oNd oOdiorO NN M roN vO 'OM ONNOdOw Nd _[D _fw0 MO; NM�O NM d(nO N r N d w O m N n O n N N d O d m N h d w M M w d r w O M d r M w d O w O M N w N O �O w M O w O M I w M M T w W0 O w M CO m O N w m N M M O O O (D r O M n d O M J r N d w O r O m O W N N h M O M N d n O O O O M m N n O O h n w N w d C W d N N Oh r M O M N M N O d O) d W d M w d (O O h f Vr Z O N w h " N M r N d O M M w w O O M O n n D7 O^ .-dNNdON N Nd ='N K O W O O M N d M N Z M w w O M w m r N w O V N m d r O n W O N O O r O t d O M a) OJ O N d O M r w M h M CJ N M r N N N w N N O 2 Z w Q w O O w w w M r M W w d M N N O M _ O O d O M Y W ^ M w' -'M N d MON wd -- LL ^L O Q � N _o z U Z r M1 d O d N r r n N d M d O d M d d M N W m w N r r d O M w r O n N w O N Q) M h h N N O N N w d N 0 �' J O d N O O 07 d O M r d M r NON MJ M N w ow r M C Q Odw"'M N dr- MON— Od v �- U .- N K = N w in �iw m n M o0o r nowiaN ww�oa U O O c O d o r d O Cl! O N d n w O N O d N M d O d r w r N N d d O d N O w d r w M r M W w O N M M1 d N w M N N O) N h d O M-" MON-- nd N � m .-_rd W N ¢ LL OnO�dd OMOO OO v'"r rw M�yNdwM T d r N N 01 M N O W O W d d w W N O yyO w l0 O d M w a O M r r O N O O d 0I d O N O d d O O w d N d N a)_O N Q! d h O d O M O r N D7 N O N M r � - Q) Nr y w O N N Z Q M ro 7 O N Lp C @ Z CQQQQ �!D Q¢I Q J m0000 �0000mQm� `o Ory d y@ N N N@ n o Z `EEEE dE E EE 0'0m '�' c -� L C v v v v v v O v v v v O� 2 O)O «@ a h N > > > > > > > > p C IJ. O O O O C 0 0 0 w �._ Q. nnx x `o. nnn•-� x a ��y �N E V v m x.�E EE E `m �m E E EE ��F "°Q ,`v_, ZOE o E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ,'� @ y o'v $> gcDQo�cDc5cDcD(D(D 0(D(9(D(D CD 3169�w:ox 7 mn N N - N M M M M M M MMM Cw'l M M M M d d d d O O O O O w O M � a a n2m d M O r I M W members input rather than the incoming Council members who will not have had the needed exposure to the City Managers performance or responsibilities to provide adequate reflection. This obviously puts us in a time crunch and a situation where the typical process of the 360 review simply is not feasible. But it is my belief that the sitting council is educated and engaged enough to be able to hold this review in a one time unconventional manner in order to accommodate the change in review scheduling. As this is a one time adjustment and as there is no protocol, I would like to outline one for your review and to be forwarded to the Council allowing them the proper time for preparation. This item should be placed at the end of the agenda and I will open it with a brief description of why we are doing the review at this time and how it will proceed. I will summarize my observation of Mr. Hoversten's performance in his new dual position and then refer to council to do the same, one at a time, starting with Council to my right and continuing until each council member has had a chance to offer their opinion. When concluded and after consideration of the conversation I will make a proposal for a financial reflection of the councils observation of the City Managers performance and take discussion at that point. After discussion, we would vote on the proposed. Please review the above and advise as you see fit. Also please remind Council of the open meeting law when forwarding. Thankyou Mark Wegscheid Mound Mayor (612) 581-6710 Catherine Pausche From: Catherine Pausche Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 2:55 PM To: Heidi Gesch; 'Jennifer Peterson Qenniferpeterson@cityofmound.com)'; 'Kelli Gillispie (kelligillispie@cityofmound.com)'; 'Mark Wegscheid(markwegscheid@cityofmound.com)'; Ray Salazar Cc: Eric Hoversten; 'Troy Gilchrist' Subject: FW: City Manager review discussion on December 13th agenda Attachments: City Manager Employment Agreement - FINAL.docx; City Managerjd - FINAL.docx ***** -OPEN MEETING LAW REMINDER: DO NOT REPLY TO ALL ***** Please see the email from Mayor Wegscheid below with regard to the following proposed agenda item for the December 13th final meeting: ##. Discussion on City Manager Performance Evaluation and possible action on City Manager Employment Agreement Attorney Troy Gilchrist and City Manager Eric Hoversten have approved of this approach. I have attached the current employment agreement and position description for your review. FYI, all changes to salary must be in the form of an amendment to the employment agreement. This is being sent in advance of the agenda packet to give each of you adequate time to assemble your thoughts. Thank you, and please just let me know if you have any questions. Catherine Pausche 952.472.0633 Direct 1952.472.0620 Fax catherinepauscheocityofmound.com From: Mark Wegscheid Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2016 2:27 PM To: Catherine Pausche Subject: City Manager review discussion on December 13th agenda Catherine, As us you know, historically the review of the City Manager has been in the first quarter of the calendar year. I have proposed this process be moved to the last quarter of the year to take advantage of outgoing Council -3197- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the final overall budget for 2017 as follows: GENERAL FUND As per above 5,368,015 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Area Fire Service Fund 1,316,320 Dock Fund 224,236 HRA Transit District Maintenance Fund 48,200 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 1,588,756 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Recycling Fund 178,479 Liquor Fund 715,662 Water Fund 1,975,430 Sewer Fund 2,335,417 Storm Water Utility Fund 407,300 TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 5,612,288 SUMMARY General Fund 5,368,015 Special Revenue Funds 1,588,756 Enterprise Funds 5,612,288 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 12,569,059 Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of December, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Wegscheid -3196- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2017 FINAL GENERAL FUND BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,368,015 ; SETTING THE FINAL LEVY AT $5,592,785 ; AND APPROVING THE FINAL OVERALL BUDGET FOR 2017. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the following final 2017 General Fund Budget appropriation: 1fillIf_l WC] e1411I1 Lill 5,368,015 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby direct the County Auditor to levy the following final taxes for collection in 2017: SPECIAL LEVIES Fire Relief G.O. Improvement 2009A G.O. Tax Increment 2009D (Dump) G.O. Refunding Bonds 2011A G.O. Improvement 2011 B G.O. Improvement 2012A G.O. Refunding Bonds 2012B (PS Building) G.O. Improvement 2013A G.O. Refunding Bonds 2013B G.O. Improvement 2014A G.O. Refunding Bonds 2014B G.O. Improvement 2015A G.O. Refunding 2016B G.O. Improvement 2016A 112, _\ta7cky1�1[1VW1/1'J Final Certified Levy Total Special Levies -3195- 68,560 215,600 175,000 350,079 193,730 50,000 349,000 100,000 45,000 42,065 75,000 272,000 46,573 117,202 3,492,976 5,592,785 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION APPROVING A LEVY OF $200,410 FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF MSA 469 OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF, AND FOR, THE CITY OF MOUND FOR THE YEAR 2017 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound is the governing body of the City of Mound; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received a resolution from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of, and for, the City of Mound entitled `Resolution Authorizing The Levy of a Special Benefit Levy Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.033, Subdivision 6 and Approval of a Budget for Fiscal Year 2017"; and WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of MSA 469, must by resolution consent to the proposed tax levy of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that a special tax be levied upon real and personal property within the City of Mound in the amount of $200,410. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the said levy, of $200,410, is approved by this Council to be used for the operation of the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority pursuant to the provisions of MSA 469 and shall be certified as a tax levy to the County Auditor of Hennepin County on or before December 29, 2016. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of December, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -3194- Mayor Mark Wegscheid E. w -3193 ATTACHMENTA PAGE 10F 1 p O p 0 p p 0 0 p O O p O O p p p O O O p O O O O O p c A d Q (O Q O N O O Q Q N ........ m N m m N N N N 0 0 0 0 N W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m w Q w w bi w m w w w w w w w w w w A O O O O o O O O O o O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O 0 0 N d m m O VI m In N O N O O O O O N x wwwwwwwwwwwwww w y d O W'-000 N. O m m O N N nN O v -10 n m m M W V C c I n nai N n N Q O Wp o 6141.- a d y N N d 0�wwwwwwwwwwwwwww O u d v = m = w o U F C 3 O O O O O O O N N n N O N n O O g V O n O O O O n W N N O N m o N O r O N O O N (p m m n (O Q O m in n N m m Q o N m o n N Q rp d N N N N N N C'1 N N N m N n NQ 0 0. '..O wwwwwwwwwwwwwww 00000000000.. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N y0 0 0 O 6.600 O O O O O 0000 O O 0.11 N O N O �U com m N i9 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Coco O O O 0 NO 0. O O O m 0, c h O O O d . O o N m c N .... 0 0 r0mo NUN m o m N C o �2 w w w w w w w w w w w w w f9 w ..Oa O. O. O. O. O.p. O. O. OOOOOO d ✓I M, O O O O W O . O O O O O N . O N O O O O O O N O O O O O N O �a wwwwwwwwwwwwww yJ w 0 0 o 0 o O o 0.o 0 o 0 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d LL 7 n 0 Q v w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w n � OiQ.NamNw � Ncmmvpimmo F- d r N c � d b N O O O O O O N N N O N O O w O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ON O O O N O W O .000 ym O 0 0 l+l O m O O O N O O O N N O m W N Q W (p m W Q O Q O N wwwwwwwwwwwwwww ovh Jdov= v d �ms�=Ewe m�void� vw E o a v E P x E m N= m m O d J d d `m d n 4 d = = . z a Q a Q a c � c a m c E= ELL U EZ = d K w+ y m x m v v v o o x o a- J 4 o o NN�'xw cwrvLCL= a W d ydj L P2 O �LLLLe-(7Q~ L ONmL W UU O v m N W > n O N pOj O U N N W N m W W Y N V N m W O m N n m m O N t7 Q w -3193 ATTACHMENTA PAGE 10F 1 d O O O 0 O O O o 0 O 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m w C m ro ro N (fin N V O N x w w w w w w w w w c O d y N N d E O d O O O O O O O O O A w J x w w w w w w w w w c O d y N N d E O u d v = m = w o U F r Z c 0 d N > W rn 0 0 3 E o W o �2 �a yJ U d d C ry LL 7 n 0 Q v N W � F- d Two -Family Usage and Multiple Dwelling Usage — ft is computed on the same basis as a single dwelling, except that the total quarterly charges on all such properties shall not be less than the number of units multiplied by the $34-24_24.2 1 /month minimum charge per unit. Water used but not placed into the sanitary sewer may be deducted providing it is metered. Dwellings Connected to Sewer but not Connected to Municipal Water— Shall pay a quarterly rate of $443 4156.71. If such users wish to pay sewer rates based on gallons of water used, they can purchase a water meter from the City and have their own plumber install the meter on their well. 74-241 Sewer Availabilitycharge(SAC) $2,435.00/unit (passes through to Metro Council Environmental Services Agency) Sewer Trunk Area Charge (STAC) $2,000.00/unit Sewer Service Connection Fee $240.00/unit Storm Sewer: Single -Family or Two-family Residential $30.58/lot/qtr. Cemeteries $4.07/acre/mo. Parks and Railroads $12.41/acre/mo. Public and Private Schools/Institutional Use $20.72/acre/mo. Multi -family Residential Uses $49.77/acre/mo. Commercial/Industrial/Warehouse Use $83.45/acre/mo. Churches $20.72/acre/mo. Recycling Household Charge: Fee per household per month $4.00/mo. Street Lighting - Franchise Fee per account per month $1.50/mo. Miscellaneous Fees: A miscellaneous fee shall be paid by the applicant for land use application expenses which the City incurs in regard to the review and processing of that application, and which exceeds the application fee. Such expenses may include, but are not limited to, direct City payroll and overhead costs, fees paid to consultants or professionals acting as an agent of the City, the cost of printing, mailing and supplies. Such miscellaneous fees shall come due immediately upon notification by the City. The City shall provide, upon request of the applicant, a breakdown of the various expenses incurred by the City. The City may withhold any final action on a land use application and/or rescind prior actions until all miscellaneous fees are paid in full. The City may request additional deposits if deemed necessary. Attachment A contains hourly and daily rates for Fire Department Apparatus and Equipment and is made a part herein. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of December, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk 3192- Mayor Mark Wegscheid Sewer: 105-100 Master plumber registration 3 tru/fto $2,225.00/meter $143 156.71 4 tru/flo $3,000.00/meter Residential: MXU only $135.00 ea. $93.7-2102.62 min/qtr Sprinkler Meters (without MXU) $5.131-6_36 Minimum quarterly charge 5/8 x 3/4 $125.00 apartment which is in accordance with existing sewer department policy. 1" $275.00 74-128 Water Meter Test $50.00/test 74-127 Water gallonage rates $a',24_34.211 Service Charge $17-43 18.91/mo/acct. User Fee Residential (Quarterly) Tier 1 1-5,000 gallons $4.54-4.92/1000g Tier 2 5,001-25,000 gallons $�5.66/1000g Tier 3 25,001+ gallons $5-g8 6_50/1000g User Fee Commercial (Monthly) Tier 1 1-2,000 gallons $4.5".92/1000g Tier 2 2,001-15,000 gallons $5-2-2 5_66/1000g Tier 3 15,001+ gallons $549 6_50/1000g New Account Charge $4&88 50.00 On/Off at curb box (during normal $35.00 business hrs.) On/Off at curb box (after normal Actual Cost business hrs.) Repair Fee Actual Cost Reconnection Fee $35.00 Sprinkler System 2 inch $3.00/mo 4 inch $4.00/mo 6 inch $6.00/mo 8 inch $15.00/mo 10 inch $25.00/mo 12 inch $33.00/mo 74-127 Water Trunk Area Charge (WTAC) $2,000.00/unit Water Service Connection Fee $240.00/unit 74-44 Water Turn -on $35.00/event 74-45 Plumber Violation $100.00/viol. Sewer: 105-100 Master plumber registration $0.00 74-241 Connection to sewer, but not water $143 156.71 Treatment rates: Residential: 10,000 gals or less $93.7-2102.62 min/qtr Over 10,000 gals/1,000 gals. $5.131-6_36 Minimum quarterly charge $93:72102.62 Note: The above minimum applies to each single family dwelling or apartment which is in accordance with existing sewer department policy. Commercial, Industrial & Multi -unit Dwellings: 3,000 gals or less $34-24_24.21 min/mo. Over 3,000 gals/1,000 gals. $&816_36 Minimum monthly charge/unit $a',24_34.211 Single Family Dwelling -The sewer rate shall be based on the actual water used. Water used but not placed into the sanitary sewer may be deducted providing it is metered. -3191- Category II Locations: Other parks (neighborhoods, veterans parks) - $50 per day with $200 damage deposit. Damage Deposit $200/day TAX FORFEIT AND/OR CITY -OWNED PROPERTY Fee for staff review of request for release of tax forfeit and/or city -owned land $200.00 Escrow Deposit for above $500.00 POLICE SERVICES Animals: 14-44 Commercial Kennel: $150.00/yr. Late application: on or after May 10 + $1.00 14-1 Redemption of impounded animal (See City of Orono Impound/Release Fees) SPECIAL CONTRACTOR LICENSES Heating, AC, Ventilation: Contractor registration: Tree Surgeon: Expires April 1st 38-207 Tree surgeon (removal & treatment) Street Excavation: 61-23 Street excavation: Unpaved street Asphalt Concrete $0.00 $200.00/yr. $100.00+$500.00 deposit $100.00+$500.00 deposit $100.00+$500.00 deposit UTILITIES - Late Fee Penalty — For all bills not paid on or before the due date specified on the bill, a 10% late fee will be added for the current amount due. Water: 74-46 Service Contract Violation 74-77 Water Meter (with MXU) 5/8 x % s/ 1 For (2) 5/8" meters For (2) 3/," meters For (2) 1" meters 1-1'/ 2 2 Hpt 3 Hpt 4 Hpt 2 tru/flo -3190- $35.00/upon t -o $275.00/meter $300.00/meter $340.00/meter $392.00 for two $495.00 for two $560.00 for two $525.00/meter $650.00/meter $700.00/meter $950.00/meter $1,500.00/meter $1,610.00/meter 78-104 Penalty fee for undeclared boat at dock (license holder) 78-104 Penalty for undeclared boat at a slip (license holder) 78-104 Penalty for illegally mooring boat to dock or slip (non -licensee) 78-121 Multiple Slip Fee 78-121 Multiple Slip LMCD Fee 78-121 Small watercraft slip fee 78-121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (Villa of Lost Lake Residents) 78-121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (to Mound residents who are not Lost Lake residents) 78-121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (to Non -Mound residents or Lost Lake Residents for second slip) 78-121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (After August 15t of the year) 78-121 Lost Lake Slips LMCD 78-121 Multiple Slip Refundable Key Deposit 78-123 Processing fee for full slip refund 78-123 Processing fee for voluntary suspension of license 78-123 Penalty for boat at slip after October 15th deadline FIRE/EMERGENCY SERVICES: Fire report (MFD Report) $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $375.00/yr $15.00 $100.00/yr $1,148.00/yr $1,950.00/yr. $2,050.00/yr $1,000/yr $18.75 $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $10.00 Hourly billing rate for reimbursable fire services $36.09/hour Apparatus hourly/daily rates for reimbursable fire services - Per Attachment A 26-56 False Alarm (per calendar year) Fire and Burglary Separate 1st $0.00 2nd $0.00 3rd $50.00 4th $150.00 5th -10th $250.00 ea. over 10 $500.00 PARKS & RECREATION: Depot rental — residents Depot rental — non-residents Depot rental - local non -profits Damage deposit Cancellation fee (Depot) City Hall/Centennial Building room rentals $125.00/day $250.00/day $25.00/day $350.00 plus $50.00 cash $50.00 $75.00/day PUBLIC GATHERING: $309.00 $600.001day Damage Deposit $500.00 $1,000.00ida 50-20 Category I Locations: Surfside_ Park, Greenway, Centenriew and Parking Deck - $300 per day with $500 damage deposit and proof of insurance. Public Gathering Permit Fee $300/day Damage Deposit 3189 $500/day Fireworks:. 38-253 License to Sell Consumer Fireworks $100.00/yr. Additional inspection if needed +$35.00 Garbage Collection: 54-48 Permit Fee $500.00/yr. Secondhand Goods Dealer Background check/investigation fee $100.00 first year Dealer License $100.00/yr. Peddlers & Solicitors: 38-152 Transient merchants, Peddler, Hawker One day $30.00 One week $50.00 One month $75.00 One year $200.00 CEMETERY FEES 18-22 Adult grave - resident (or prior resident with proof) $600.00 Adult grave - non-resident $1,100.00 Baby -grave resident (U2 GFave) $300.00 Baby grave-.neR resident (112 Grave) $550.90 Half Grave - Babies & Urns Ash b, resident 042-GravO $300.00 Half Grave - Babies & Urns Ash buriai - non-resident (U2 GFaye; $550.00 Locate Actual cost (min $35.00) Maintenance Agreement (June -Oct) $15.00/mo. Ash burial placed on top of casket (limit 1 urn) $50.00 DOCKS: 78-38 Commercial Boat (fee per boat) $30.00/yr. 78-56 Commercial Dock Renewal $500.00/yr. Slips $30.00 ea/yr. Boats stored on land $10.00 ea/yr. 78-76 Charter Boat License Fee $1,000.00/yr or $100.00/occurrence Investigation Fee $100.00 78-101 Non-refundable processing fee for wait list Application $20.00/yr 78-101 Processing fee for full dock refunds $50.00 78-101 Late dock license application fee on or after March 1St (abutters only) $50.00/mo. 78-101 Late dock license application fee for applications received between March 1" and March 31St (non -abutters only) $100 78-101 Dock fee that includes primary watercraft (1 boat) $325.00/yr 78-101 Each secondary watercraft $100.00/yr. 78-101 Sailboat mooring $325.00/yr 78-103 Shared dock application - filed on or after March 1St $25.00 78-102 Temporary Visiting Dockage Permit - up to 21 days $50.00 78-103 Shared dock (Secondary Site Holder Fee) $175.00/yr LMCD charge (based on boat length) Set by LMCD LMCD charge (no boat) -3188- Minimum as set by LMCD (for profit) 6-21 Set-ups (+State charges $150 for Consumption & Display Permit) Temporary (one -day) set-ups 6-49 Liquor Lic. Investigation fee per investor (in state) (out state) 6-48 Liquor on -sale Liquor on-sale/cabaret Temporary On -Sale Liquor (1-4 Day) 6-48 Wine on -sale Investigation fee $50.00/day $300.00/yr. $25.00/day $500.00/applicant Actual (up to $1,000) $5,000.00/yr. $5,000.00/yr. $50.00/event $500.00/yr. $500.00/investigation 6-48 Club license (regulated by State) Membership 200 or less: $300.00/yr. Membership 201-500: $500.00/yr. Membership 501-1,000: $650.00/yr. Membership 1,001-2,000: $800.00/yr. Membership 2,001-4,000: $1,000.001yr. Membership 4,001-6,000: $2,000.00/yr. Membership more than 6,000: $3,000.00/yr. 6-48 Sunday liquor $200.00/yr 6-53 Civil Penalty for violation to comply First violation $500.00 Second violation $750.00 Third violation $1,000.00 plus public hearing before City Council to consider suspension and/or revocation of license 6-117 Civil Penalty for violation to comply First violation $500.00 Second violation $750.00 Third violation $1,000.00 plus public hearing before City Council to consider suspension and/or revocation of license Charitable Gambling: Investigation fee (set by State) $200.00 Cigarettes: Now regulated by the County. -3187- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2017 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: Fees shall be hereby established. In the event of a conflict between this schedule and the City Code the fee schedule shall prevail. An application or code provision may require payment of fees for consultation with experts, professionals, or other qualified persons or for other matters which may result in the imposition of a fee greater than listed in this fee schedule. ADMINISTRATIVE FEES & CHARGES Comprehensive Plan $30.00 Copies $0.25/page Faxes $0.25/page DVD/CD with electronic info $5.00 each 38-23 Duplicate license/permit $10.00 each Board and Commissions Minutes (not Council) $0.25/page Notary (set by State) $1.00 each Returned Check $30.00/check Zoning Ordinance $20.00 74-129 Late fee for invoices not paid within 30 days 1 % per month (for billable services provided by City) AMUSEMENT & COMMERCIAL RECREATION Amusements: (Set by State) Expire April 30 10-37 Mechanical Amusement Machines $15.00/location+ $15.00/machine Arcades: Expire Dec. 31St 10-37 Arcade Permit (fee per machine) $15.00/location + $15.00/machine Carnivals. Shows, Entertainment: 10-73 Circus, carnival, or show Indoor show $100.00/day Outdoor show $100.00/day Tent shows $100.00/day 10-73 Musical concert (only if no public -gathering permit) $50.001day-event Parades: 38-1 Parade N/C BUSINESS AND MISCELLANEOUS Alcoholic Beverages: Expire June 30tH 6-112 3.2 beer license investigation fee $500.00/investigation 3.2 beer off -sale $150.00/yr. 3.2 beer on -sale $500.00/yr. 3.2 beer on -sale temporary (non-pro:3186 $25.00/day ATTACHMENTA PAGE 1 QF i IKI CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 15-146 APPROVING FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2016 WHEREAS, on December 8, 2015 the City Council approved Resolution 15-146 approving the Fee Schedule for 2016 (Resolution); and WHEREAS, the Resolution did not include hourly or daily rates for Fire/Emergency Services that are reimbursable; and WHEREAS, instances exist in mutual aid agreements and other agreements where the Fire Department can bill for fire/emergency services; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby adopts a resolution amending City Resolution No. 15-146 Approving a Fee Schedule for 2016 with the following language: FIRE/EMERGENCY SERVICES: Fire report (MFD Report) $10.00 Hourly billing rate for reimbursable fire services $34.89/hour Apparatus hourly/daily rates for reimbursable fire services - Per Attachment A 26-56 False Alarm (per calendar year) Fire and Burglary Separate 1 St $0.00 2nd $0.00 3`d $50.00 4th $150.00 5th -10th $250.00 ea. over 10 $500.00 Be it further resolved by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby approves the hourly and daily rates for Fire Department Apparatus and Equipment as contained in Attachment A and made a part herein. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of December, 2016. Catherine Pausche, Clerk -3184- Mayor Mark Wegscheid mOpt CNoONo�oo'-_No'Vo' Noo0No'ooWoso- VoV0V0�0�00O o N(OaOo0o90Oop9000f0000 00Mlo 000o0oooo op0 OO vO CD NOOVOVNWOOO OOOOOOO O M 0 NWV CD WWLO W co V O V o W OmOLOpoM NI- 0 W 6 m in N N 69 (9 69A69 VI E9 f9 E9 fA H3 AA LMOD E9 FA fA fA E9 EA FA di " O O O O o O O O O O o o 'O O O O O O p 0 0 o O 4) (O O O O O p O O O O O O O O O 'O 0 0 0 0 0 O EO V h. o O W O m W V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '00000 O (O O Of ��(nov'oVr-InoW0M000000000 o n (O co m m V O .- M m W V LO W O O W W LO W 0 V O m O Ci W COrN ��MN NN •-(D� C V V m— W (O (O N Uj (y r W O N E9 E9 E9 CA E9 UlV1 (9 EA E9 E9 E9 EA EA 0 EA 613,69 E9 E9 H} fA H t O O O O O O O o o 0000 000 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 O O a N O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 O O 'O 0 0 0 0 0 N1 Omp E90 Eo09 f0A F_0A (V O OOOOOOOOO O D O �O V CO W W V W W o Wmmm o W W co V -q a) ODN Nm V-MVVN M OI LO LO r N O M N N NMO N W w E9 i(9 w 9 E9 9 E9A69969A9 6 60pDOOOONWI O(00 0 co (1W O O Nv t o o o O O o o O o O O O O o o o 0 o O O O O O (O 0 0 ....... O O o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 O N M O o 0 0 m 0 I- o O O O O O p O 0 0 p 0 O LO m O O. � O W V O (n O m o 0 a(DC)000000 0 w O co m N Cl W r t, r M V N OD r- t` W '(D o W V_ (D O'm O (O (p C4 rOM,O_.MN NN ON.-M.V V00 'OON a o dM4 O N 000000 N f9 fA EA ff! Vi fA.(H E9 Efi EPr ER f9 f9 fA Vd EA fA f9 fA f9 f9 E9 69 �" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '.O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N p 0 0 0 0 W f0 CO O O O O O O O O O O O O O V Imo' M IO 0 0 0 0 m W N N M 0 0 0 000 0 0 000 O �- O m M N V O O W o r O c -:W 0 V W 0 LO W N (O N N co n (p li! t` N u'i N O (fl W m N M V V O (D V N (O f� I N �- O M N N (0 I V O N N f9 f9 E9 EA f9 fA b4 E9 EA EA EA f9 ffi EA fA EA fA fA fA E9 f9 f9 E9 " 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O M w O 0 00 V 4 (fJ O OO OOO OOOO OO t0 (C (O m LOOo 0 0 m N 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M tom . �. m n t--(0 OO CDN (0 �- W O VM o 0 W NWON (D � V M (O N Ln M N W (n W C) 06 V V O W V (`'1 t` (p (D N .- •- o_ M r- N .- _V I Cl) O (O N E9 E9 E9 Vd E9 0 E9 0 E9 E9 0 (A E9 613-64 VS E9 EA E9 E9 EA E9 (H " 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O a O O O O O 'O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O O o O p M OO OO OO o, N W 0000000 cj00000 (O N O n 7 N 0 0 0 O 47 V t� LO O o 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 N N IT t\ N m W OOOrO NLO W (O W tO W 47 N iO V.(0OIt V (0 m M ri gNN(OOM W V (O 00 a0NM V V NNN V O 04 O EO NEA ER E9 f/-1 E9 E9 f9 VS E9 fA V3 fA f9 fA f9 EA 6 9 E9 f9 EA EA f9 fA c 'o No O N O d 0 O p 0 (n N L (O L DD tO c (O to O. N C- N N N> N D w.�.N d c a°ti � m <� � E 3 a0'� (°i �0oi5 o c p o N a m m m z d Eck= Z Z� 6 (CD) 2 d x m c V E2af �(n aoow.0 m �w �(n -iz c a) d y !a) U 0 C r U a C h i °� N U `� U� (a N O cLu c E O 0 0 2 o Y M .c m .o aa) U) o� d 2 `m x v K F- c2 21Da o �.co U) y� N N d LL w — a LL �c a`) m E Oc LL O 2 ¢ U 0 F LSO 00 tO0 V (O W om00I-I. IV -7o V W W M M M M L O O O O O NV V M M V N- '- NN NMMMMM V V December 8, 2016 TO: Mayor Mark Wegscheid Mound City Councilors Ms. Catherine Pausche FROM: Fire Chief Gregory S. Pederson SUBJECT: Mound Fire Department Hourly Rates for Staff and Apparatus The fire department needs to have current hourly rates established when billing for services. Most of the fire department services are not billed out; however in some cases we bill for services therefore we do need to have hourly rates for Hazardous Materials Response, Mutual Aid, Fire Contract to Saint Bonifacius, and other miscellaneous services. I have calculated new hourly rates that include both staff and apparatus. The new rates for 2016-2017 are included with this memorandum. The new MED hourly rates would become effective after approval at the December 13, 2016 City Council meeting. I am requesting that the city council approve of the 2016 -2017 hourly rates, which will be included in the City of Mound Fee Schedule Please refer detailed information attached. attachments -3182- j:\admin\financial, budgets, contract, expenses\ch a rging for fire dept services with hourly rates\memo to cc hourly rates. docx CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION 16 - AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS ON A PROGRAM TO PROMOTE THE PLANTING OF TREES ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE 191»AIVAAhIi106r1*di9*612 �i[4Ig111�7 WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.221, subdivision 8, states city councils "[s]hall have power to provide for, and by ordinance regulate, the setting out and protection of trees, shrubs, and flowers in the city or upon its property"; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to begin planning for and planting replacement trees for the large number of ash trees on both public and private lands that are expected to be destroyed by the Emerald Ash Borer disease; and WHEREAS, grants are available from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and a cost share program is available through the Tree Trust dispensing program, both of which require the city's financial participation; and WHEREAS, there are many economic and environmental benefits of trees as well as partially fulfilling the city's obligation for public engagement on clean water education; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound authorizes the City Manager to work with the Parks Commission in determining the best approach and authorizes the expenditure of public funds on a program to promote the planting of trees on public and private property within the City of Mound. Passed by the City Council this 13th day of December, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -3181- Mayor Mark Wegscheid PAGE 2 Tree Dispensing Programs The City maintains a requirement for public engagement on clean water educational information as part of its Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. The messaging, training, and public outreach of tree programs are highly favored by MPCA and MDNR in regard to meeting the MS4 requirements due to their direct engagement with and long-term impact on participants. The Tree Trust has indicated a desire to submit a grant request on behalf of the City of Mound through the MCWD to cover 75% of program costs to provide a free tree to participating residents. The target City participation here is $2,500 if selected for funding by MCWD. This program is favored in that it results in a free tree for the participant and stretches the City dollar 3:1. These trees are normally 5 -gal or 1 -inch bagged/burlap, ready to plant. Any unclaimed trees could be planted on City property but the goal would be 100% private consumption. Alternatively, we can establish a separate distribution program with Tree Trust where residents and the City share the cost of a tree. These trees are 10 -gal, 1.5 -inch potted trees, ready to plant. Participants need to attend the Tree Trust on site planting, care, and clean -water demonstrations on pick-up day. Cost of these trees is roughly $115 per and the City would set the public/private cost -share ration - typically keeping the resident cost around $40 - 45. Under either program, tree selection would be determined by the MDNR recommended species listing for our region of the Metro. SITE INSPECTION No site inspection is required. RECOMMENDATION The City Council approve the final proposed budget of $7,000 for a tree planting program in the Promotions budget (moved from the preliminary Parks Dept budget); and direct the Public Works Director, Parks Commission, and Parks Department continue to working with MCWD and the Tree Trust to develop a tree distribution program for the City as a Promotions Program, as specified in the attached resolution. -3180- 2 CITY OF MOUND:-- PUBLICWORKSDEPARTMENT 2415 Wilshire Blvd Mound, MN 55364 TO: City Council FROM: Eric Hoversten, City Manager and Director of Public Works DATE: December 5, 2016 SUBJECT: Promotions Budget, Tree Dispensing Programs LOCATION: NA REQUEST: Council authorize expenditure of public funds on a program to promote planting of trees on public and private property within the City of Mound. The distribution activity would be through a partnership with the Tree Trust using a resident/City cost -share to cover City's tree costs and/or participation in a 75/25% matching -funds grant with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) to make trees available to residents free of charge. CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REVIEW City Staff included a $7,000 line item in the 2017 Parks Department preliminary budget submission to allow for participation in both/either a matching -fund grant from MCWD to provide free trees to community residents, or to cover the City's portion in resident/City cost share necessary to participate in Tree Trust dispensing programs. The $7,000 budget appropriations was moved to the City Council Promotions budget to better reflect the discretionary nature of this program compared to basic parks department services. The economic and environmental benefits of trees throughout cities are substantial. The Legislature has given cities the authority to provide for trees, shrubs and flowers "in the city" and not just on city property. (Minn. Stat. Sec. 412.221, Subd. 8; https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=412.221. According to the statute, city councils "[s]hall have power to provide for, and by ordinance regulate, the setting out and protection of trees, shrubs, and flowers in the city or upon its property." Mound has not yet seen the impact of the westward progression of Emerald Ash Borer; but should begin planning for and planting replacement trees for the large number of ash trees on both public and private spaces that will likely be impacted. Ash trees were highly selected as a replacement for the Elm population when it was decimated by the Dutch Elm Disease. Our urban forest is also over -represented in Cottonwood and soft Maple varieties so a deliberate effort to build diversity is also appropriate and achievable through dispensing programs. -3179- 1 Mound City Council Minutes— November 9, 2016 ASSESSMENTS AND NET REVENUES AND LEVYING A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF 8. Catherine Pausche Director of Finance and Administrative Services, requesting action on Resolution Approving Documents Related to the Local Housing Incentives Account Program (LHIA) Loan and Environmental Response Fund (ERF) Loan Related to the Indian Knoll Manor Proiect Pausche said this is another grant where the City will serve as fiscal agent on this grant, but the loan will allow for the funds to be used in the Indian Knoll Manor redevelopment project. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 16-155: RESOLUTION APPROVING DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM (LHIA) LOAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND (ERF) LOAN RELATED TO THE INDIAN KNOLL MANOR PROJECT 9. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/reports from Council Members B. Reports: Fire Dept - October 2016 C. Minutes: D. Correspondence: NfN DNR -October 21, 2016 City Council Hoversten thanked everyone for their participation in the election and announced the results including Mayor Wegscheid as Mayor and Ray Salazar and Jeff Bergquist as Council Members. Hoversten said the election process went well and thanked Staff and the election judges that made it happen. Mayor Wegscheid thanked staff for the efforts involved to accommodate early voting and the extra work involved. Mayor Wegscheid noted newly elected officials participate in the League of MN Cities training for networking and education on the legalities as well as an orientation with each of the department heads. Hoversten noted the next HRA/CC meeting will take place on Nov. 22nd, the same might as the Mound Westonka Tree Lighting, and said that although there will be a meeting, an effort will be made to keep the agenda light. Hoversten noted the City Newsletter had the wrong date of Nov. 17th for the tree lighting as it had to be rescheduled due to a conflict. Hoversten also noted one council meeting will be held in December on the 13th, as the 27th was cancelled. 10. Adiourn MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Gillispie, to adjourn at 7:47 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Wegscheid -3178- Mound City Council Minutes — November 9, 2016 RESOLUTION NO. 16-151: RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR THE 2017 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - WILSHIRE BOULEVARDIMAYWOOD ROAD/HIDDENVALE LANE, CITY PROJECT NO. PW -17-02 C. Action on Resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans for the 2017 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Tuxedo Boulevard, Phase III, City Project No. PW -17-03 MOTION by Ray Salazar, seconded by Jennifer Peterson, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 16-152: RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR THE 2017 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - TUXEDO BOULEVARD, PHASE III, CITY PROJECT NO. PW - 17 -03 7. Stacie Kvilvang, Senior Municipal Advisor/Director, Ehlers, Inc, reporting on the results of the 2016 bond sale and requesting action on: Stacie Kvilvang stated that S&P renewed the AA Rating with Stable outlook over the next two years, highlighting the positive factors, both economic and managerial, that they based the rating on. Kvilvang said even with the uncertainty caused by the presidential election, there was a favorable response to both issues, with 7 and 8 bidders respectively, and both with lower rates than projected. A. Resolution Accepting Proposal on the Sale of $5,950,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2016A, Providing for their Issuance and Pledging for the Security Thereof Special Assessments and Net Revenues and Levying a Tax for the Payment Thereof MOTION by Ray Salazar, seconded by Kelli Gillispie, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 16-153: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL ON THE SALE OF $5,950,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2016A, PROVIDING FOR THEIR ISSUANCE AND PLEDGING FOR THE SECURITY THEREOF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND NET REVENUES AND LEVYING A TAX FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF B. Resolution Accepting Proposal on the Sale of $2,845,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2016B, Providing for their Issuance and Pledging for the Security Thereof Special Assessments and Net Revenues and Levying a Tax for the Payment Thereof MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 16-154: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PROPOSAL ON THE SALE OF $2,845,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 2016B, PROVIDING FOR THEIR ISSUANCE AND PLEDGING FOR THE SECURITY THEREOF SPECIAL 3177- Mound City Council Minutes — November 9, 2016 Simmons noted that the detailed design phase has not begun yet and that feedback will be incorporated. Jacob said the people who store trailers there come in a high rate of speed and shake his house. Vince Forystek, 4600 Tuxedo Blvd owner, said the strip of grass by his property between the sidewalk and road should be eliminated because grass does not survive. Tim Lembke, 5212 Lynwood, asked if Morton Channel could be dredged during the project. Simmons said that would be a completely different project and the Mayor suggested he talk to staff off-line. Ruth Clark, 2343 Fairview Lane owner, said her properly fronts Fairview Lane and backs up to Hiddenvale and wondered why they would be getting a full assessment. Simmons said orange lots on map are half an assessment. Clark asked about changes to the retaining wall on Hiddenvale. Simmons said the goal is to make the wall shorter and push the wall back from the curb. Clark said it can't get shorter if it is pushed back. Hoversten said in this case, Staff is considering pushing the curb line out to create more room and that the adjacent landowners will be consulted to see if overall pitch can be changed. Simmons said a new fence would be added at the top of the wall. Clark asked when design would happen and Hoversten said December/January. Mary Moon, 5280 Lynwood Boulevard, congratulated the re-elected officials. Moon asked that if she was assessed a full assessment in the past, although she is on a corner, would she be subject to another assessment. Hoversten said the previous assessment will be researched and if found to be a full assessment, she would not. The Mayor closed the public hearing at 7:32 pm. A. Action on Resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans for the 2017 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Lynwood Boulevard/Fairview Lane, City Project No. PW -17-01 MOTION by Ray Salazar, seconded by Jennifer Peterson, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 16-150: RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR THE 2017 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - LYNWOOD BOULEVARD/FAIRVIEW LANE, CITY PROJECT NO. PW -17-01 B. Action on Resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans for the 2017 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Wilshire Boulevard/Maywood Road/Hiddenvale Lane, City Project No. PW -17-02 MOTION by Ray Salazar, seconded by Jennifer Peterson, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3176- Mound City Council Minutes —November 9, 2016 replaced. Simmons noted the addition of new side walk along Maywood Road and existing sidewalk will be repaired or replaced as needed. Simmons showed a breakdown of estimated costs for each project area, which also separated the cost from the amount eligible for assessment. Area 1 Lynwood - total project cost estimate is $1.649M with $295K assessable portion of street improvements which excludes the extra section for MSA standards, utility street costs and retaining walls. Two-thirds of assessable cost will be split with commercial assessment (combination method) of $71,270 and remainder to residential (18.5 ERUs) estimated at $6,792 with a cap of $6,600 per the amended assessment policy from 2015. Area 2 Wilshire Blvd - total project cost estimate is $1.773M with $534K assessable portion of street improvements which excludes the extra section for MSA standards, utility street costs and retaining walls. Two-thirds of assessable cost will be split with commercial assessment (combination method) of $218,380 and remainder to residential (9.83 ERUs) estimated at $14,030 with a cap of $6,600 per the amended assessment policy from 2015. Area 3 Tuxedo Phase III - total project cost estimate is $1.074M with $581K assessable portion of street improvements which excludes the extra section for MSA standards, utility street costs and retaining walls. Two-thirds of assessable cost to residential (35.66 ERUs) estimated at $10,856 with a cap of $6,600 per the amended assessment policy from 2015. Simmons showed sample schedule with bidding in March 2017, bulk of construction in summer 2017, and assessment hearing in fall of 2018. Mayor Wegscheid opened the public hearing at 7:16 pm. Tim Lembke, 5212 Lynwood Blvd rental property, asked if retaining wall will be replaced, what will happen with the sidewalk and asked for clarification of what an ERU is and what will happen to the two vacant lots near the house, 5234 Lynwood and an unassigned lot to the east. Simmons said Equivalent Residential Unit method (ERU) treats each residential unit as one unit versus linear frontage method. City Manager Eric Hoversten said city does not distinguish between buildable and unbuildable, but rather if there is a separate PID. Wegscheid said the staff and Council have learned a lot during the street improvement process and although it would be difficult to make changes this far along, lessons have been noted for the future. Simmons located the parcels on the map and determined they are being treated as two separate ERUs. Simmons said the streets are not being widened in this area. Hoversten said the retaining walls will be rebuilt and sidewalks will be reconstructed on an as -needed basis. Bill Jacobwith, 5280 Lynwood, said he lives across from the Balboa building and wondered if the driveways could be widened where the semis come in and out to reduce impact on neighboring properties. -3175- Mound City Council Minutes — November 9, 2016 B. RESOLUTION NO. 16-143: RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES WITH KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED C. RESOLUTION NO. 16-144: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HOISINGTON KOEGLER INC. D. RESOLUTION NO. 16-145: RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL CITY ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH BOLTON & MENK, INC. E. RESOLUTION NO. 16-146: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MNSPECT F. RESOLUTION NO. 16-147: RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT AND MUSICAL CONCERT PERMIT FOR 2016 ANNUAL MOUND TREE LIGHTING CEREMONY AND WAIVING PERMIT FEES DUE OT PUBLIC PURPOSE OF GATHERING G. Approve Pay Request No. 4 from Ryan Contracting in the amount of $817,439.00 for the 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project; City Project Nos. PW -16- 01, PW -16-02, PW -16-03, PW -16-04 H. Pay Request No. 1 from Pember Companies, Inc. in the amount of $37,314.52 for the 2016 Lift Station Improvement Project, City Project No. PW -16-05 I. RESOLUTION NO. 16-148: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR AND EXECUTION OF GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FOR THE 2014 MUNICIPAL INFLOW AND INFILTRATION GRANT PROGRAM J. RESOLUTION NO. 16-149: RESOLUTION TO CANVASS RETURNS AND DECLARE THE RESULTS OF THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 8, 2016 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. None were offered. 6. Public Hearing Brian Simmons Assistant City Engineer, presenting the feasibility report for the 2017 Street Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Projects and requesting action on resolutions ordering improvements and preparation of plans. Simmons showed a map of the improvement plan projects and said 2017 projects were split into three areas, including Lynwood Boulevard, Wilshire Boulevard, and Tuxedo Boulevard Phase III. Simmons noted width varies by street and in some areas the changes in width will be smoothed out. Tuxedo water main improvements will be limited to replacement of hydrants. Sanitary sewer will include a flow meter added at the end of Lynwood. Storm sewer improvements will be limited to catch basin replacements and all retaining walls will be -3174- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 09, 2016 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in a rescheduled regular session on Wednesday, November 09, 2016, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid; Council Members Jennifer Peterson, Kelli Gillispie and Ray Salazar Members absent: Council Member Heidi Gesch Others present: City Manager/Public Works Director Eric Hoversten, Fin Dir/Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Johanna Baden, David Baden, Lauren Miller, Vince Forystek, Mary Mann, Tommy Clobes, Max Lund, Leo Kreatz, Cody Rolighed, Brendan Dreyer, Parket, Larson, Dylan Roth, Ben Holbert, Hunter Bauer, Oben Howard, Lexi Corbett, Charlie Bailey, Tashiyah Dempsey, Maddie Niederer, Liz Schepers, Quinn Tice, Tim Lembke, Cam & Diane Cross, Grant Sterne, Noah Brammer, Neil Schmalz, Ruth Clark, Alan Beard, Charlie Treat, and Beau Taunton, Bill Jacobwith. Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. Mayor Wegscheid introduced high school students in the audience and asked the group to select a representative to come forward. Neil Schmalz, 5645 Krammer Road, stated the majority of the students at the meeting tonight are from Mr. Kuehl's Advanced Government class. Wegscheid pointed out to the students that the Council is also a body that has been selected by the community to represent them. 2. Pledge of Alleaiance 3. Approve agenda Hoversten noted replacement pages 2806, 2810 and 2834 and additional pages 2809.1 and 2833.1 related to the bond sale. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $442,774.25 -3173- CITY OF MOt1ND RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING HEIDI GESCH FOR HER YEARS OF SERVICE ON THE MOUND CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, Heidi Gesch has served on the Mound City Council for two terms since she was sworn in on January 13, 2009, and WHEREAS, during her tenure Ms. Gesch has demonstrated her leadership by being one of the most engaged and active Council Members, and WHEREAS, Ms. Gesch played a lead role in the 2012 contract for police services with the City of Orono, and, WHEREAS, Ms. Gesch served many years as the Acting Mayor and Council representative on both the Parks and Open Spaces Commission and the Orono Police Commission, and WHEREAS, Ms. Gesch also served on the Personnel Committee and helped to manage a transition in the City Manager position in 2015, and WHEREAS, the City wishes to recognize Ms. Gesch for her many contributions to policy development and decisions including furthering the City's investments in infrastructure, redevelopment, and providing for key services to the citizens of Mound, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby recognizes and extends our appreciation to Heidi Gesch for her years of dedicated service while serving as a member of the Mound City Council. Adopted by the City Council this 13`" day of December, 2016 Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -3172- Mayor Mark Wegscheid MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 6, 2016 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Jeffrey Bergquist, Doug Gawtry, David Goode, Jameson Smieja, and Jennifer Peterson. Members absent:. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jill Norlander. COMMISSIONER CANDIDATE INTERVIEWS The Commission interviewed the following individuals for appointment: Phil Velsor, Christine Valerius, Dean Bussey, Jake Saystrom, and David Pelka. A vote was taken by paper ballot with scores as follows (lower scores being preferred): Phil Velsor (20), Christine Valerius (29), Dean Bussey (19), Jake Saystrom (18), David Pelka (16). MOTION by Goode, second by Gawtry, to recommend reappointment of Planning Commissioner Jameson Smieja. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Goode, second by Gawtry, to recommend appointment of David Pelka and Jake Saystrom for 3 year terms, Dean Bussey for a 2 year term, and Phil Velsor for a 1 year term. MOTION carried unanimously. -3171- Applicant Materials. With written permission from the applicants, the Applicant information Volunteer Commissions Application Form for the candidates interviewed were provided to the City Council under separate cover and not included in the agenda packet for the December 13th meeting. Following appointment of the new Planning Commission members, the application materials are to be returned by the City Council members for compliance with Minnesota data practices regulations due to the private classification of some of the information contained in the applications. Planning Commission Candidate Voting and Recommendations. Following the completion of the candidate interviews, a written ballot method of voting was used by the Planning Commission which yielded the following tally: Phil Velsor 20 Christine Valerius 29 Dean Bussey 19 Jake Saystrom 18 David Pelka 16 The candidate receiving the lowest score is ranked highest by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission's recommended candidates for appointment and term assignment are as follows: David Pelka Three year term (beginning January 1, 2017 and ending December 31, 2019) Jake Saystrom Three yearterm (beginning January 1, 2017 and ending December 31, 2019) Dean Bussey Two year term (beginning January 1, 2017 and ending December 31, 2018) PhilVeisor One year term (beginning January 1, 2017 and ending December 31, 2017) The Planning Commission also unanimously recommended that Jameson Smieja be reappointed. Excerpts from the December 6, 2016 Planning Commission meeting minutes (draft) have been included. ® Page 2 -3170- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-0604 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayorand CityCouncil From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: December8, 2016 Re: Planning Commission Appointments Planning Commission Term Expiration and Vacancies. The Planning Commission terms of Jameson Smieja, Doug Gawtry and Doug Stone expire at the end of the year. Mr. Smieja is requesting to be re- appointed; however, Mr. Gawtry has opted not to seek re -appointment and Mr. Stone resigned earlier this year. Therefore, there are two vacancies with terms of three years which expire on December 31, 2019. There is also vacancy to fill the remainder of the term of former Planning Commissioner Pete Wiechert who resigned earlier this year. This term is for two years and expires on December 31, 2018. Additionally, a new vacancy was created when Planning Commissioner Jeff Bergquist was elected to the City Council. This term is for one year and expires on December 31, 2016. Prescreening. The City received 12 candidate applications. As provided by the 2016 Planning Commission Work Rules, the Chair, City Manager and Community Development Director met on November 30, 2016 to prescreen the applications and selected seven applicants to be interviewed. Planning Commission Interviews. Candidate interviews were held as part of the regular Planning Commission meeting on December 6, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. The following candidates were interviewed: Phil Velsor Christine Valerius Dean Bussey Jake Saystrom David Pelka Therese West and Kevin Kamerud were also selected for an interview as part of the prescreening process. Ms. West and Mr. Kamerud notified Staff on December 6th that they were withdrawing from the application process. City Council Attendance at Planning Commission Meeting. A public notice was prepared and posted on the City Hall bulletin board on November 21, 2016 by the City Clerk so that the City Council, including a quorum of body, could attend the December 6th meeting to listen to the Planning Commission's discussion and recommendation following the interviews. City Council members Gesch and Gillispie attended the December 6th Planning Commission meeting. -3169- TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number Lions (Northwest Tonka Lions) July 1950 11 Address Minnesota Department of Public Safety 2590 Commerce Blvd. Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101 Mound—I Minnesota 55364 651-201-7500 Fax 651-297-5259 TTY 651-282-6555 Alcohol &Gambling Enforcement APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number Lions (Northwest Tonka Lions) July 1950 11 Address City State Zip Code 2590 Commerce Blvd. Mound—I Minnesota 55364 Name of person making application Business phone Home phone JackieGreenslit r I 11952-297-7863 Date(s) of event Type of organization January 15, 2017 ❑X Club ❑ Charitable ❑ Religious ❑ Other non-profit Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Jason Zattler - Pres I St. Boni Minnesota I Organization officer's name City State Zip Code MarcDeoper-Hove -Secty Mound Minnesota I Organization officer's name City State Zip Code —� Minnesota Organization officer's name City State Zip Code Minnesota Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe. Gillespie Center, 2590 Commerce Blvd., Mound, MN 55364 Chili Feed for the Troops If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service. no If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage, yes / Wiser Insurance / USG / 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT Mound City or County approving the license $50.00 Fee Amount Dec 7, 2016 Date Fee Paid Date Approved City or County E-mail Address City or County Phone Number Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved. Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE: Submit this form to Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 30 days prior to event. ONE SUBMISSION PER EMAIL, APPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VALID E-MAIL ADDRESS FOR THE CITY/COUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SENT BACK VIA EMAIL. E-MAIL THE APPLICATION SIGNED BY CITY/L.3168-TO AGE.TEMPORARYAPPLICATION STATE.MN.US Lost Lake Homes & Marina, LLC 4301 Highway 7, Suite 100 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 952.920.8555 December 5, 2016 City of Mound Attn: Sarah Smith / City Council 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: Security/Escrow for Lost Lake Homes development Dear City Council, Our development is getting close to being complete, as of now we have completed the Improvements as required by the development agreement, this included Landscaping, private utilities and installing the 2 n bituminous lift to the street. We request that the $68,750.00 that is being held by the city of Mound be released to us at this time. Please let us know if you require anything else or if this is sufficient to refund the security escrow. Sincerely, Mark Saliterman -3167- RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION APPROVING RELEASE OF FINANCIAL SECURITY FOR THE LANDINGS ON LOST LAKE WHEREAS, the Subdivision Agreement for "The Landings on Lost Lake" project required the submittal of financial security in the amount of $68,750.00 for certain improvements to be constructed as part of the project; and WHEREAS, the specific improvements included work on the private streets, private utilities installation and landscaping; and WHEREAS, Mark Saliterman (Subdivider), on December 5, 2016, submitted a request for release of the financial security as the required work for the 'The Landings on Lost Lake" project has been completed; and WHEREAS, Staff has reviewed the submitted request related to the constructed improvements and recommends release of the financial security. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve release of the financial security for "The Landings on Lost Lake" project as recommended by Staff. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound this 13th day of December, 2016 Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952)472-0604 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: December 8, 2016 Re: Request for Release of Financial Security — "The Landings on Lost Lake" Summary. Mark Saliterman, on December 5, 2016, submitted a request to the City for release of the financial security in the amount of $68,750 that was submitted for "The Landings on Lost Lake" project as the required improvements, which included private street work (2nd bituminous lift), private utilities installation and landscaping activities, have been completed. Members are advised that Dave Kaplan, on behalf of Mr. Saliterman, confirmed that the landscaping for the project was installed in accordance with the approved plan and that all planting/sodding activities are covered by a warranty. Recommendation. Based on its review of the request and field evaluation, Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution authorizing approval of the draft Resolution authorizing release of the financial security for "The Landings on Lost Lake" project. -3166- CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY BRIA IN GOVT I HENNEPIN E8 TM LEWL GESGRPTON : (rwm irvxt=es pu4 per 0°p. - 99809]0) °t amt or IM Wex °I p! pvl I °1 5, , SwIM1 nl S"t. '19 n y Ne. 110, tl — cI`Cmnlyn e W I °Y"'v°eM L to lle6liod 0I" L a°d°atm 'is S-riy o!"!1° !e wl^,Nq 'ea l `lIf irnv Commenen9°a x' °Nwevli0io Rm�ILy wsl°9=t'- r.da lad" s .n orM o/rle °L E�%vna °Y° `"IR000 tat seam bnq..i Im° of wietvknlnn a u° ww!If °win 67°1 Nced�'a.2m101e8e3ndaneE: 0R05e31='.Mmultrinnil[l°ppIFew]e .mWe rtt,IItG,m Nie3alptGtOdoM1v'°, qmHmrennelsp yeL'MtC.w5`, nIwYn. dlM7°v:neeinIf `lt�t,I°�°ee5ovcIni c np_, nZlii eoi1^°ew l ,,tat.dIwC°"aiyRN°1110 epone eeocu! N°, PROPOSED LEGAL MES PIONS : inoott Ecrt °I W W t ]6.°89 fat °I p✓t If p; Wex1 150.0 lee! nl th.1 G Gwemment Lot 5. 1y' u M1 al Sl n W� 1 — I-- ee G-" Rocd°W. I Iq f !ne s A9F °88cr. L�qe M wO�eMlcn 201, or�po,ip v N°nn ft"I 36 wm! i ,am Trustees Deed, per Doc, no. 9950974) :l of that part of Government Lot 5, lying South of State County Road No. 110, and running to Halstead Bay, Lake 117 North, Range 24 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, allowing described line: Commencing at the Northwest corner is plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the ty, Minnesota; thence Southerly on an assumed bearing of 1 Rolling Shores and the East line of the West 150.00 feet of 339.43 feet to the centeNine of Bay Ridge Rood; thence secontls West along the Southwesterlyy extension of said et, thence South ]4 degrees 00 minufes 53 seconds West, West line of Government Lot 5, said point of intersection of the South right—of—way line of County Road No. 110. icated to the City of Mound, as set forth in Deed Document ,ment No. 4220480, Hennepin County, Minnesota. t of that part of the West 150.0 feet of that port of State Highway No. 110, also known as County Road No. 110, e Minnetonka, Section 23, Township 117 North, Range 24 West also Iying Southerly of the following described line: me of Rolling Shores; according to the plot thereof on line y flood No, l ID. Sub th in Deed Document irmesota. t of that part of Government Lot 5, lying East of the West p�C rt_ th of State Highway No. 110. also known as County Road No. -3164- VVV , Lake Minnetonka, Section 23, Township 117 North, Range 24 LAKE on, and also lyong Southerly of the following described R corner of RR ling Shores; according to the plot thereof of the Re ter of Deeds, Hennepin County, Minnesota; bearing of South along the West line of said Rolling Shores 50.00 feet of Government Lot 5, o distance of 339.43 feet MINNETONKA HARDCOVER REQUIREMENTS Impervious surface coverage of lots shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. On existing lots of record", impervious coverage may be permitted by a maximum of 40 percent providing that techniques are utilized as identified in Section 129-385 (g)(2). Impervious cover is any surface impervious or resistant to the free flow of water or surface moisture, including all buildings, driveways and parking areas whether paved or not, tennis courts, sidewalks, patios and swimming pools. Open decks (1/4" minimum opening between boards) shall not be counted in impervious cover calculations. UCl/1 nr-U HVVI-JJVR1 UVILUilll' - LVl I UVWIOUV A11Y JWLUO ft MUUMIU11 An accessory building shall be considered to be an integral part of the principal structure unless it is five feet or more from the principal structure or use and providing that the structure exceeds 120 square feet. Area and Size Requirements (see hardcover requirements on page 1) A. Accessory buildings shall not exceed a total gross floor area of 3,000 square feet or 15% of the total lot area whichever is less. B. Each individual accessory building shall not exceed 1,200 square feet of gross floor area. C. The total number of accessory buildings for lots measuring 10,000 square feet or less shall be two (2). On lots exceeding 10,000 square feet, accessory buildings shall be limited to a total of three (3). Front Yard Setback. All accessory buildings shall meet thte same front yard setback requirements as the principal building, except for Lakeshore and through lots. For detached garages on a lakeshore or through lots, a minimum twenty (20) foot front yard setback is required if the garage door(s) open to the street; an eight (8) foot front yard setback is required if the garage door(s) open to the side lot line. 3. Side Yard Setback. A detached accessory building may be located within four (4) feet of the side lot line in the rear yard with a minimum of a six (6) foot setback in side yard location. On through and Lakeshore lots, a detached accessory building may be located within four (4) feet of the side lot line in the front yard. Whenever a garage is designed with the doors facing a side lot line, the minimum distance between the doors and the side lot line shall be twenty (20) feet. 4. Rear Setback. A detached accessory building may be located within four (4) feet of the rear lot line. 5. Lakeshore Setback. Detached accessory buildings must maintain a 50 foot setback from the ordinary high water. DECKS See separate deck handout for more information. Front and Sides.....................................................Same as Accessory Building Setbacks Rear..............................................................................................................10 feet ELEVATION � Ordinary LAKE MINNETONKA 929,4 MCWD 931.5 933 CITY 931 DUTCH LAKE 939.2 940 942 LAKE LANGDON 932.1 935 937 -3163- 2013 This information sheet only summarizes a portion of the requirements outlined in the City of Mound Zoning Ordinance. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein. However, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. For further information, contact the City of Mound Planning Department at 952-472-0607. General Zoning Information Sheet R-1 Zoning District — Single Family Residential PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS --Lot Area, Lot Width and Setback Requirements Minimum Lot Area ... .............................................. ........... .............. 10,000 Square Feet MinimumLot Width......................................................................................... 60 Feet FrontYard Setback....................................................................................... 30 Feet SideYard Setback........................................................................................10 Feet RearYard Setback........................................................................................15 Feet MinimumLot Depth........................................................................................80 Feet Lakeshore / Ordinary High Water Setback. .................... ................................ 50 Feet Minimum Floor Area Requirement ........................................................840 Square Feet *Minimum lot frontage on an improved public street shall be 60 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall be 60 feet at the front building setback line. Applicable side or rear yard setbacks apply to lot lines abutting fire lanes, alleys or unimproved street right-of-ways. Building Height. The vertical distance to be measured from the average grade of a building line to the top, to the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. No building hereafter erected shall exceed two and one half (2-1/2) stories or thirty-five (35) feet in height. LOTS OF RECORD, Special Provisions Corner Lots (City Code Section 129-197 - 50 feet 10 feet I eet I 20 feet I 8140 feet et8o0r(more 30 feet Side Yard Requirements - The required side yard setback shall be a minimum of I 40 - 79 feet I 6 feet I 80 - 100 feet 8 feet 101 feet or more 10 feet Front Yard - Except as regulated in Section 129-197 (f) of the City Code, the front yard setback shall be based on the lot depth as follows: Lot depth Minimum front yard setback 60 feet or less 20 feet 61 - 80 feet 24 feet 81 feet or more 30 feet 2013 November 1, 2016 City of Mound Novas 2415 Wilshire Boulevard n t Mound, MN. 55364 Attn: Mayor and City Council Members Subj: Request for Review and Approval of a Two Lot Subdivision for BT & JA Thomas at 6385 Bay Ridge Road Ref: a) City of Mound Subdivision Information Packet Encl: 1) Completed application form with associated fees and escrow 2) Proposed certificate of survey for Parcels 1 and 2 In accordance with the requirements of reference a), enclosures 1) and 2) are hereby submitted for your review and approval. Questions of a technical nature should be directed to Mark Gronberg at 952-473-4141; all others to the undersigned. A project narrative follows: This is a very simple lot split which will result in two new parcels, 1 and 2, which will then be offered for sale. After demolition of the existing house, garage and driveway, two new homes are anticipated, each with their own individual access to the Bay Ridge Road cul-de-sac; there are no variances for this land use action and existing City services will be utilized. Chuck Alcon, Project Coordinator, 612-201-7139 Cc: BT/JA Thomas Brian Benson -3161- mWh.r isip to: FN76004-EtoA-46CF-A2e6-F2F33F000A21 0 0 11- Y ctT� oP Mou 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952.472-6666 FAX 452-472-0626 PLANNING COMM. DATE /Of, —(I, " CITY COUNCIL DATE: (,? APPLICATION CASE NO. Please type or print clearly 1&-41 Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, 06 no. if yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution numbers) and provide copies of resolutions. lApplication must be signed by all owners of the sub""" I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or pians to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. i acknowledge that 1 have read all of the information provided and that l am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. r Signature r/Aethentiu.. Date J3enaetin J k°°°a° �d.""` J PROf7dQd 10/20/2016 ®tiff3�f°�w 1012MO1610:27 10 Pm WT Date Minor Subdivision Information (1/14/2016) Page 4 of 4 -3160- AddressEXISTING Subject . ., ►; PROPERTY LEGAL Lot Block- Subdivision DESCRIPTION Zoning APPLICANT Name Address _ a - OWNER R ,. otheril . applicant) Addre SURVEYOR/ .. 11A..+.� n. Email .� lPhone ENGINEER Offia��Cell _Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, 06 no. if yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution numbers) and provide copies of resolutions. lApplication must be signed by all owners of the sub""" I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or pians to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. i acknowledge that 1 have read all of the information provided and that l am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. r Signature r/Aethentiu.. Date J3enaetin J k°°°a° �d.""` J PROf7dQd 10/20/2016 ®tiff3�f°�w 1012MO1610:27 10 Pm WT Date Minor Subdivision Information (1/14/2016) Page 4 of 4 -3160- 16. Additional comments and/or conditions from the Planning Commission, the City Council, Staff, consultants, private utilities and public agencies. 17. Restoration of any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction, including but not limited to, installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be the responsibility of the permit holder. 18. No work is authorized or approved on public property, including but not limited to, public streets or ROW, as part of this application. Applicant is advised that additional permitting may be needed in the event construction or other related activities are undertaken on any public streets or on public -owned land and is contingent upon the specific improvements proposed to be constructed. In recommending approval of the minor subdivision, Staff offers the following findings: 1. The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The subject lots have frontage on an improved public street and municipal utilities are available. 3. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed lot arrangement can accommodate the construction of 2 new single-family homes with conforming setbacks and hardcover. 4. The minor subdivision will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on adjoining property. 5. The proposed new lots meet the standards for a non lot of record in the R-1 single- family residential zoning district. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it is anticipated that the minor subdivision request will be reviewed at an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time, the tentative date is Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. -3159- 6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. Applicant is advised that there are historic indian burial mounds and/or earthwork sites in and around the City of Mound. While many of the mounds have been severely impacted by development over the years, the mounds do, however, receive protection under state law; and penalties are imposed for unauthorized disturbance of mounds. Information may be obtained through the Minnesota State Archeologist. Any formal investigation of a site, including a determination of whether a mound or burial area exists on a subject site, is the responsibility of the property owner or developer. The issuance of permits by the City to do work on a site does not relieve the owner or the developer of that responsibility. Payment of park dedication fees as required by Sec. 121 of the City Code prior to the release of the resolution for recording. The amount due is $1,100 for one of the newly created lots. 9. Payment of Trunk Area Water Charge for one lot is required prior to the release of the resolution unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. The amount due is $2,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit is issued. 10 Payment of Trunk Area Sewer Charge for one lot is required prior to the release of the resolution unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. The amount due is $2,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit is issued. 11. Payment of sewer connection fee of $240.00 and water connection fee of $240.00 for Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. 12. Payment of the MCES SAC charge for one lot shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. The applicant shall determine which lot shall receive the credit for the existing house. The amount due shall be the current amount in effect at the time. 13. If the subdivision requires the construction of utility improvements (i.e., water services, sewer services, etc.), these activities must be constructed and installed prior to the release of the resolution, to include any and/or all required permitting and inspection. Alternately, the applicant may submit a contractor's estimate, which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director- City Manager(or designee) and submittal of a cash escrow in the amount of 125 percent of the contractor's estimate. 14. The applicant shall provide a bank release or written consent for the application and proposed subdivision from the mortgage holder(s) and/or all lienholder(s). This information shall be provided for review and acceptance by the City Attorney before the City's release of the resolution and/or other supporting documents for recording at Hennepin County. 15. The applicant shall provide the existing and proposed legal descriptions in electronic form (MS Word preferred) for inclusion in the official documents. -3158- 4. A preliminary grading plan was not required for the proposed minor subdivision. However, a detailed grading plan will be required for the proposed new lots at the time of future building permit application for the new structures which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director -City Manager. 5. The City's regulations for accessory structures are contained in City Code Sec. 129-194. 6. A full list of allowable encroachments is contained in City Code Sec. 129-197. A partial list and brief summary is provided below: Code allows chimneys, window air conditioners, belt courses, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels, ornamental features, mechanical devises, eaves and the like to extend no more than two (2) feet into any required setback. Gutters are exempt but cannot encroach over property line(s). Steps are allowable encroachments as long as they are setback a minimum of two (2) feet from any lot line. Retaining walls are allowable encroachments in setbacks. Any retaining wall exceeding four (4) feet requires a building permit and includes the submittal of engineering and/or structural certification. Mechanical equipment is allowed to encroach two (2) feet into setback areas STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested minor subdivision for the property at 6385 Bay Ridge Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. Driveways for new lots must be hard surfaced in accordance with City Code regulations. Minimum driveway width is 10 feet; maximum width is 24 feet. A minimum side setback of one (1) foot is required. Driveway locations for the new lots shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director -City Manager or designee. 2. A detailed grading plan shall be required with the submittal of a building permit. Drainage shall not be directed to neighboring properties. 3. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction, including but not limited to, installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be the responsibility of the permit holder. 4. The existing house and garage shall be demolished prior to the release of recording of the resolution approving the 2 -lot minor subdivision. 5. As part of the City's approval of the subdivision, the dedication of public drainage and utility easements, to be determined by the Public Works Director, will be required and shall be submitted in a form to allow for recording at Hennepin County, and shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City, prior to recording. -3157- Water/ Sewer and Trunk Area Charge / Sewer and Water Connection Charge Trunk Fees. The 2016 trunk water charge is $2,000.00 per lot and the 2016 trunk sewer charge is $2,000.00 per lot. Assuming that one (1) SAC credit will be made available for the subject property by the MCES, the City's collection of the trunk area water charge and sewer are trunk charge would follow the same evaluation. Payment of trunk water and trunk sewer area charges for the new lot will be collected prior to release of the resolution. Connection Charges. The 2016 sewer connection fee is $240.00 per lot and the 2016 water connection fee is $240.00 per lot. These fees will be collected at the time of building permit issuance and shall be the amounts in effect at the time. STAFF/CONSULTANT/AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the proposed minor subdivision application and supporting materials were forwarded to involved departments, consultants, agencies and private utilities for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and are, therefore, not included in this report. Comments received to date have been summarized below: Greg Pederson, Fire Chief There are no Fire Code or Life Safety concerns with this project. Scott Qualle, Building Official No issues. Heidi Quinn, MCWD A subdivision of less than 3 lots does not trigger MCWD stormwater rule. The proposed homes after the subdivision will require an erosion control permit and potentially wetland protection. if the lots are developed for anything other than a single family home, stormwater management will be required at that time. (Note: Members are advised that information about potential wetland was shared with the applicant's project manager.) DISCUSSION 1. The property currently has lot of record status. With an approved subdivision, the new lots will no longer retain lot of record status and therefore will be subject to the standard lot standards for a R-1 lot, including a maximum of 30 percent hardcover. 2. Each lot will have its own driveway. Per code, minimum driveway width is 10 feet and maximum width is 24 feet. Side setbacks are 1 foot on each side. Driveways must be hard surfaced. 3. Applicant is required to provide written consent from the bank and/or any lien holder for the proposed subdivision. -3156- Lakeshore Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. Imperviousness 30 % 30 % 30 Floodplain. For Lake Minnetonka, the 100 -year floodplain elevation is 931.0. The 929.1 elevation is shown on the proposed minor subdivision/survey. Per code, all new structures must meet or exceed the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or be three feet above the ordinary high water mark of a wetland, as applicable. This will be a condition of approval for the subdivision. Wetlands. Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.4 (Wetlands) from the 2030 Mound Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be wetlands on the subject property. See also comment from Heidi Quinn from the MCWD in the Staff/Consultant/Agency Review and Comment section of this report. Park Land Dedication. Dedication of park land and/or payment of fees in lieu of land dedication is required by Sec. 121-121 of the City Code. If the subdivision is approved, Staff recommends the submittal of a cash payment in lieu of park dedication. For minor subdivisions, the approved 2016 fee is $1,100.00 per lot. As one credit would be granted for the existing lot, $1,100.00 in park dedication fees would be required for a proposed 2 -lot subdivision. Park dedication fees will be collected prior to the release of the resolution for recording. INFRASTRUCTURE Water and Sewer. There are utility services available to the subject property. Utility connection work will be required if the minor subdivision is approved. Applicant is advised that local and/or agency permits may be required for utilities installation. Staff suggests the applicant contact the Public Works Department for additional information related to utilities. Storm Water. Stormwater permitting is under the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) following regulatory authority turn back to the District by the Mound City Council which took place in August, 2011. MCES Sewer Area Charge (SAC). The 2016 MCES fee for a SAC unit is $2,485.00. MCES charge will be collected at the time of building permit issuance for the new lot and shall be the amount in effect at the time. It is anticipated that one (1) MCES SAC credit will be made available for the subject property. If the subdivision is approved, applicant should determine which lot shall receive the MCES SAC credit when building permits are issued.. -3155- PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a courtesy letter on November 30, 2016 to inform them of the Planning Commission's review of the minor subdivision request at its December 6th meeting. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan. The City's current Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Low Density Residential, which allows for single-family detached and attached housing types within the density range of 1 to 6 units per acre. Density is computed area wide as opposed to an individual site. The proposed subdivision meets the Comprehensive Plan guidance. Zoning. The subject property is located in the R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129-100 of the City Code. It should be noted that lots approved as part of a minor subdivision, including those with existing structures, are no longer eligible for "lot of record" status and must meet the same standards as new lots. The following table shows the minimum requirements for the R-1 District for a single-family lot. Based on Staff review of the proposed lot configuration, the lots new lots meet the requirements. -3154- 10, 000 sq. ft. 21,552 sq. ft. 24,045 sq. ft Lot Area Lot Frontage Street - For cul-de sac 60 ft. 66.5 ft. 67.7 ft. lots, minimum lot frontage is measured at the minimum building setback line (30 feet) Lake - measured at 929.4 60 ft. 75.5 ft (+/-) 75.5 ft (+/-) OHWM for Lake Minnetonka Lot Width Street - Measured at 30 60 ft. 66.5 ft. 67.7 ft, ft. front setback Lake - Measured at 60 ft. 75.5 ft. 75 ft. minimum lakeshore setback line (50 feet from 929.4 OHWM for Lake Minnetonka) Lot Depth 80 ft. 326.58 (+/-) 390.48 (+/-) Front Yard Setback 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. Side Yard Setback 10 ft. 10 ft./10 ft. 10 ft./ 10 ft. -3154- PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: OWNERS: LOCATION: MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director November 30, 2016 16-41 Minor Subdivision Brian Benson Benjamin and Julie Thomas 6385 Bay Ridge Road (PID No. 23-117-24-33-0023) December 6, 2016 Low Density Residential R-1 Single Family Residential REQUEST AND BACKGROUND The applicant is proposing a 2 -lot minor subdivision of the property at 6385 Bay Ridge Road and is requesting review by the Planning Commission. The 50,707 foot property, which fronts Bay Ridge Road (cul-de-sac) on the north side and Lake Minnetonka on the south side, includes an existing single family home and a detached garage. The existing house, which straddles the proposed new lot line between proposed Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, is to be demolished to allow for the construction of two (2), new single family homes. The existing garage on proposed Parcel 2 is also being demolished. REVIEW PROCEDURE Subdivision Whenever a subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner, or authorized agent, shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance with the procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 121. The proposed lot arrangement qualifies as a minor subdivision as described in Sec. 121-35 (1) of the City Code as it contain three or fewer residential lots and does not involve the construction of public facilities or public improvements. 1 ll_.. 1... •; i9 Ronk Minnesota statutes require approval or denial of a subdivision request by an agency within 120 days. The minor subdivision application was submitted on November 1, 2016. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 120 -day rule for the subdivision application and was determined to be November 2, 2016. The City's deadline for action on the minor subdivision request is on or around March 1, 2017 unless an written extension is granted by the applicant. -3153- ITHIVITE DECEMBER 6, 2016 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Jeffrey Bergquist, Doug Gawtry, David Goode, Jameson Smieja, and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jill Norlander. BOARD OF APPEALS PLANNING CASE NO. 16-41 2 LOT MINOR SUBDIVISION 6485 BAY RIDGE ROAD BRIAN BENSON Smith introduced the request to subdivide the subject property into 2 single family lots. The property fronts Bay Ridge Road on the north side and Lake Minnetonka on the south side and includes an existing single family home and detached garage. The existing house straddles the lot line between proposed Parcels 1 and 2 and is to be demolished, along with the garage, to allow for the construction of 2 new single family homes. All of the R-1 zoning standards are being met. Discussion Chuck Alcon, 6138 76`h Lane, Greenfield, representing the applicant, stated that the conditions identified in the report can be addressed and requests approval of the conforming subdivision. Brian Benson, 201 E Lake St, Wayzata, would like to build a reasonably sized home with good character and details. MOTION by Smieja, second by Gawtry, to recommend approval of the subdivision with recommendations and findings of fact as identified by staff. MOTION carried unanimously. -3152- 16. Additional comments and/or conditions from the Planning Commission, the City Council, Staff, consultants, private utilities and public agencies. 17. Restoration of any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction, including but not limited to, installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be the responsibility of the permit holder. 18. No work is authorized or approved on public property, including but not limited to, public streets or ROW, as part of this application. Applicant is advised that additional permitting may be needed in the event construction or other related activities are undertaken on any public streets or on public -owned land and is contingent upon the specific improvements proposed to be constructed. In recommending approval of the minor subdivision, the City Council makes the following findings: The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The subject lots have frontage on an improved public street and municipal utilities are available. 3. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed lot arrangement can accommodate the construction of 2 new single-family homes with conforming setbacks and hardcover. 4. The minor subdivision will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on adjoining property. 5. The proposed new lots meet the standards for a non lot of record in the R- 1 single-family residential zoning district. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound this 13th day of December 13, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -3151- 7. Applicant is advised that there are historic indian burial mounds and/or earthwork sites in and around the City of Mound. While many of the mounds have been severely impacted by development over the years, the mounds do, however, receive protection under state law; and penalties are imposed for unauthorized disturbance of mounds. Information may be obtained through the Minnesota State Archeologist. Any formal investigation of a site, including a determination of whether a mound or burial area exists on a subject site, is the responsibility of the property owner or developer. The issuance of permits by the City to do work on a site does not relieve the owner or the developer of that responsibility. 8. Payment of park dedication fees as required by Sec. 121 of the City Code prior to the release of the resolution for recording. The amount due is $1,100 for one of the newly created lots. 9. Payment of Trunk Area Water Charge for one lot is required prior to the release of the resolution unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. The amount due is $2,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit is issued. 10 Payment of Trunk Area Sewer Charge for one lot is required prior to the release of the resolution unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. The amount due is $2,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit is issued. 11. Payment of sewer connection fee of $240.00 and water connection fee of $240.00 for Parnel I and Pnrcone lot shall be required at the time of building permit issuance and shall be collected for the east lot. 12. Payment of the MCES SAC charge for one lot shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. The applicant shall determine which lot shall receive the credit for the existing house and shall be assigned to the west lot. The amount due for the east lot shall be the current amount in effect at the time. 13. If the subdivision requires the construction of utility improvements (i.e., water services, sewer services, etc.), these activities must be constructed and installed prior to the release of the resolution, to include any and/or all required permitting and inspection. Alternately, the applicant may submit a contractor's estimate, which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director - City Manager (or designee) and submittal of a cash escrow in the amount of 125 percent of the contractor's estimate. 14. The applicant shall provide a bank release or written consent for the application and proposed subdivision from the mortgage holder(s) and/or all lienholder(s). This information shall be provided for review and acceptance by the City Attorney before the City's release of the resolution and/or other supporting documents for recording at Hennepin County. 15. The applicant shall provide the existing and proposed legal descriptions in electronic form (MS Word preferred) for inclusion in the official documents. -3150- WHEREAS, in granting approval of the minor subdivision request, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The subject lots have frontage on an improved public street and municipal utilities are available. 3. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed lot arrangement can accommodate the construction of 2 new single-family homes on Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 with conforming setbacks and hardcover. 4. The minor subdivision will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on adjoining property. 5. The proposed new lots meet the standards for a non lot of record in the R-1 single- family residential zoning district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approves the minor subdivision of the property at 6385 Bay Ridge Road, as described in Exhibit A, with the following conditions Driveways for new lots must be hard surfaced in accordance with City Code regulations. Minimum driveway width is 10 feet; maximum width is 24 feet. A minimum side setback of one (1) foot is required. Driveway locations for the new lots shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director - City Manager or designee. 2. A detailed grading plan shall be required with the submittal of a building permit. Drainage shall not be directed to neighboring properties. 4. The existing house and garage shall be demolished prior to the release of recording of the resolution approving the 2 -lot minor subdivision. 5. As part of the City's approval of the subdivision, the dedication of public drainage and utility easements, to be determined by the Public Works Director, will be required and shall be submitted in a form to allow for recording at Hennepin County, and shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City, prior to recording. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. -3149- Lake Minnetonka) Lot Depth 80 ft. 326.58 (+/-) 390.48 Front Yard Setback 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. Side Yard Setback 10 ft. 10 ft./SO ft. 10 ft./ 10 ft. Lakeshore Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. 50 ft. Imperviousness 30 % 30% 30 and WHEREAS, the proposed new lots meet the requirements of the R-1 District for a non - lot of record; and WHEREAS, whenever a subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner, or authorized agent, shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance with the procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 121; and WHEREAS, the proposed lot arrangement qualifies as a minor subdivision as described in Sec. 121-35 (1) of the City Code as it contains three or fewer residential lots and does not involve the construction of public facilities or public improvements; and WHEREAS, lots approved as part of a minor subdivision, including those with existing structures, are no longer eligible for "lot of record" status and are required to meet the same standards as new lots; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in Planning Report No. 16-41 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the minor subdivision application and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the minor subdivision application at its December 13, 2016 meeting and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the minor subdivision request at its December 13, 2016 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision was made within the 120 -day timeline for subdivision decisions contained in Minnesota statutes; and -3148- RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION APPROVING MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR THE PROPERTY AT 6386 BAY RIDGE WHEREAS, the applicant, Brian Benson, submitted a request for a minor subdivision to create two buildable parcels from the property located at 6385 Baywood Road; and WHEREAS, the 50,707 foot property, which fronts Bay Ridge Road (cul-de-sac) on the north side and Lake Minnetonka on the south side, includes an existing single family home and a detached garage. The existing house, which straddles the proposed new lot line between proposed Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, and the detached garage are to be demolished to allow for the construction of two, new single family homes; and WHEREAS, according to Hennepin County tax records, the property is owned by Benjamin and Julie Thomas. The applicant, on November 30, 2016, closed on the purchase of the property and the new ownership name is Langdon View LLC; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R-1 (Single Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in the City Code Chapter 129; and WHEREAS, the following table shows the minimum requirements for the R-1 District for a single-family lot and evaluation of the proposed new lots' conformity with the regulations: -3147- 10, 000 sq. ft. 21,552 sq. ft. 24,045 sq. ft Lot Area Lot_ Street - For cul-de sac 60 ft. 66.5 ft. 67.7 ft. lots, minimum lot frontage is measured at the minimum building setback line (30 feet) Lake - measured at 929.4 60 ft. 75.5 ft (+/-) 75.5 ft OHWM for Lake Minnetonka Lot Width Street - Measured at 30 . 60 ft. 66.5 ft. 67.7 ft. ft. front setback Lake - Measured at 60 ft. 75.5 ft. 75 ft. minimum Lakeshore setback line (50 feet from 929.4 OHWM for -3147- ADDITONAL INFORMATION • The applicant, Brian Benson, recently closed on purchase of the property. The ownership entity is "Langdon View LLC." Staff has included information in the proposed resolution regarding the property transfer and the new ownership name. • Condition No. 3 is recommended to be removed as it is a duplicate of Condition No. 17. This deletion is shown in strike -out form in the proposed resolution. • Condition No. 11 is recommended to be revised to indicate that payment of sewer and connection water fees will be required for one lot. This change has been shown in strike- out/underlined form. • The applicant confirmed with Staff that the west lot is to be assigned the credits for the MCES and the sewer and water connection charges. Condition No. 10 and Condition No. 11 have been modified to reference this information. These changes are shown as strike-out/underlined text in the proposed resolution. • The final version of the resolution will not include the strike -out and underlined text and will also be renumbered. -3146-