79-11-27Mound, Minnesota
AGENDA
CM 79-416
CM 79-425
CM 79-418
CM 79-423
CM 79-424
CM 79-426
CM 79-417
CM 79-420
CM 79-421
CM 79-419
CM 79-422
Mound City Council
November 27, 1979
City Hall
7:30 P.M.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ll.
12.
14.
I. Planning 6ommission Recommendations
A. Subdivision of Land - Lots lO-16, Incl., Block 15, Avalon Pg. 3244-3246
B. Height Variance - Tonka Toys Pg. 3242-3243 (Be out Monday)
6. Street Front Variance - Lot 8, Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood"
2. Tax Forfeit Land - Lot l, Block 3, Devon Pg. 3240-3241
3. Beachside Pg. 3236-3239
Street Contruction
Fire Department Salaries Pg. 3235 ,..,~.~-~'
Parking Permit - Pg. 3233-3234
Comments and Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit)
Three Way Stop at Idlewood and Oaklawn Pg. 3231-3232
County Road 110 Construction Pg. 3229-3230
Commercial Dock Ordinance Pg. 3225-3228
Bus Passenger Shelters Pg. 3223-3224
Planning Agreement Pg. 3220-3222
Payment of Bills
Information Memorandums/Misc. Pg. 3218-3219
15. 'Committee Reports
Page 3247
CITY OF MOUND
Hound, Hinnesota
027-7~)
November 26, 1979
COUNCIL MEMORAND.UM NO. 79-425
SUBJECT: Planning Commission
Tonka Toys has requested that their request for a height
variance be withdrawn.
They say they have found another way to handle the problem.
Leonard [.. kO~'l~
Toys
5300 SHOREUNE BOULEVARD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 · TELEPHONE: 6'12/472-8000
TELEX: 2902'19
November 21, 1979
City of Mound Clerk's Office
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Dear Person:
We do not wish to proceed with the height variance
request recently submitted.
Please withdraw this variance request at this time.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
TONKA TOYS
Wayne UHub in
Plastics Manager
WH:pt
11-27-79
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
November 26, 1979
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79'427
SUBJECT: Addendum to Council Memorandum 79-421
Commercial Dock Ordinance
In Council Memorandum.79-421, we stated that we charge a $25.
fee plus $1.50 per dock for Commercial Dock License.
This should be corrected to show under the present Commercial
Dock Ordinance, the fee is $50.00 plus $1.50 per dock.
~ Leonara L. Ikopp -- I /
BRANCH OFFICES:
,Lalolla. California 92037
120O Prospect SIreel. Suile 150
[714] 459-2661
Norlhbrook, Illinois 60062
1{99 Skokie Btvd., Suite 540
1312] 564-4010
San Francisco, California 94104
220 Sansorne Street. Suite 1200
1415} 981-2648
Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
170 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER, 7900 XERXES AVE. SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431
Member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation
TOLL FREE MINNESOTA 800-862-6002 TEL. 612-831-1500 TOLL FREE OTHER STATES 800-328-0'122
November 19, 1979
Mr. Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager
City Hall
5341 Maywood Road
Motund, Minnesota 55364
Dear Len:
Enclosed is a memorandum received this morning summarizing action taken last
Friday (November 16, 1979) by the House Ways and Means Committee. In what
appears to be Ways and Means' final "solution" to transition rules under
their single family mortgage revenue bond legislation, they adopted a number
of liberal exceptions for state housing finance agencies and several specific
cities and states, but they seem to have ignored cities in Minnesota. As a
result, cities in our State which had not taken specific action prior to
April 25, 1979 sufficient to qualify under the previously approved, but very
stringent, transition rule will now be able to issue bonds for single family
housing, but only in an amount up to $50 per capita. Thus, a city with a
Population of 10,000 could only issue $500,000 in bonds. A 30,000 population
would authorize a $1,500,000 issue, and so on.
While this represents only action by ~he Ways and Means Committee, and action
by the Rules Committee, the full House of Representatives and, of course, the
Senate is still to come, this version of the bill is clearly a blow to those
cities which had intended to issue single family mortgage revenue bonds, but
had not taken action to fall under the earlier transit_ion provisions. At this
point we would have to say we are not very optimistic, but we will keep you
apprised of further developments.
RWL:jcm
Enclosure
Very truly you_rs_~_
Richard W¥~Lincoln
Senior Finan~'i'al-CQ~ul tan t
KUTAK ROCK & HUIE
November 16, 1979
i NOV 19 1979i
L
Re: H.R. 3712/H.R. 5741
Enclosed is the most recent in our series of memorandums
regarding legislation affecting the tax-exempt status of
mortgage revenue bonds.
You will be kept advised of' future developments.
MEMORANDUM
The House Ways and Means Committee, by a vote of 20 to
12, Friday approved H.R. 5741, the measure offered by Chairman
A1 Ullman (D-Ore.), to restrict the use of tax-exempt revenue
bonds to finance single family home mortgages. Ullman had
offered the measure on October 30 after his H.R. 3712 was
rejected by the Rules Committee and sent back to Ways and
Means for reconsideration.
The new bill, which made several changes in the transi-
tional rule contained in H.R. 3712, was further amended by
the panel at its markup session on Friday:
State housing finance agencies, limited in the original
version of H.R. 5741 to issuing $100 million of bonds, less
any already issued under the transitional rule, are allowed
under .the version approved Friday to issue $150 million,
minus any amount already marketed under the transitional
rule.
A "sunset" provision was added which would ban
tax-exempt mortgages two years after enactment of H.R. 5741.
The committee agreed to permit a choice by the full
house between the proposal of Representative Henson Moore
(R-La.) that would replace the mortgage bond program with a
federal income tax exclusion of $100 ($200 for married
couples) on interest earned on savings in thrift institutions
offering home mortgage loans and the amendment offered by
Congressman Thomas J. Downey (D-N.Y.). The Downey proposal
is essetntially the same set of restrictions contained in the
permanent rule of H.R. 3712.
Chairman Ullman announced that he hoped to have the
Committee Report on ~.R. 5741 filed by Monday, November 26,
and would promptly seek a closed rule (which would preclude
floor amendments) from the Rules Committee which decides the
timing and conditions of consideration by the full House.
With th~ House leadership aiming for a mid-December
.J
adjournment of the ~irst Session of the 96th Congress, little
time would be left for floor consideration, but aides believe
the matter could be brought up and voted on before adjourn-
ment.
The issue then would to the the Senate where a number of
bills on the same subject are pending. Chairman Russell Long
(D-La.) of the Senate Finance Committee, has declined to con-
sider them pending action by the House. Should the House
pass the legislation, the Senate would take it up when it
reconvenes in January.
Attached to
ened transitional
Gephardt (D-Mo.).
November 16,
this memorandum is a summary of the broad-
rule offered by Congressman Richard A.
1979
Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year.
Let's now look more at the doughnut and not so much at the hole. We have lots
of troubles, but remember that we still have a viable economy; have freedoms
enjoyed by few others; come and go as we please; work if and where we want;
don't worry unduly about our lives and property, about use of hunger, disease
and death to achieve political aims. If ever there was a moral system, we have
it, not perfect, but a thousand times better than the totalitarian governments
suffered by most of the world. Lest we lose it, the rhetorical question should
not be "Ask not what the government can do for you", not "Ask not what you can
do for your government", but "Ask first what you can do for yourselves".
Interest rates and prices are high, the stock market is shaky, we're seemingly
outmaneuvered in world affairs, plagued with all sorts of protests: But these
are solvable problems if we think a little more calmly, speak a little more
softly and listen a little more carefully, believing in ourselves.
Marking the beginning of our second twenty-five years of financial consulting,
how lucky we are to have found a need and a service to fill it. It's so
satisfying to see a school or a hospital or a utility plant that we helped
build, now debt free.
One business note: Why are interest rates high? Are high interest rates good?
If not good, necessary? Interest rates are high because inflation is high,
because there seems no other way to keep holders from dumping dollars which
would bring about a disastrous inflation. Should they perceive a long term
negative return from owning dollars, that we intend to inflate our currency,
there is a danger of a flight from dollars, that they will be spent on consumer
goods and thereby cause out-of-control inflation. If we try to force interest
rates down by further inflating the money supply the very short term results
might appear "good" but the danger is that people might soon not want dollars at
all.
High interest rates are not good, for anybody,
but better than much higher interest rates or
uncontrollable inflation. And, it appears, high
interest rates are needed in the short run to~
induce investors to value their dollars.
Without inflation and taxes on interest income,
interest rates would be the three or four per-
cent that we thought normal~ when the firm
started in January, 1955.
Very truly yours,
FIRST NATIONAL-SOO LINE CONCOIJRSE 507 MARQ, UETTE AVE.
DOW-JONES INDEX 7.67%
I 20-YEAR BORDS i
LAST WEEK 7~6~_
PREV. WEEK7.76%
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Monday, November 5, 1979
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS
MINNEAPOLIS, MINI~ESOTA 554[)2 339-8291 {AREA CODE 6121
SUMMARY OF AREA BOND SALES
MINNESOTA
Years of
Municipality Sale Date Type of Bonds ~OURt Maturity
Albertville 9/10/79 G.O. Improvement $1,145M 82/2001
Albertville 9/10/79 G.O. Temporary 445M 81
Arlington 9/10/79 Improvement series 1979 610M 82/96
White Bear 9/10/79 G.O. Temporary Improvement 840M 82
Mountain Lake 9/10/79 G.O. Improvement 800M 80/92
Deer River ISD #317 9/11/79 G.O. School Bldg. series C 1,360M 81/99
Duluth 9/12/79 General Obligation 2,845M 81/95
Little Falls 9/17/79 Improvement 500M 82/2001
Elk River 9/17/79 G.O. Improvement 380M 81/97
Spring Lake Park 9/17/79 G.O. Water Revenue 750M 81/99
Windom 9/18/79 Improvement series 1979 660M 81/2000
St. Cloud 9/19/79 Improvement 1,100M 82/91
Kandiyohi County 9/20/79 G.O. Drainage Ditch 2,640M 81/2000
Buffalo Lake 9/25/79 Temp. Sewer Improvement 1,050M 81
Mahtomedi 9/26/79 G.O. Improvement 635M 82/96
Brandon ISD #207 10/1/79 School Building 575M 81/99
Lake' Crystal 10/1/79 G.O. Water Bonds 300M 81/2000
Sauk Rapids 10/1/79 G.O. Tax Increment 500M 82/95
Watonwan County 10/2/79 State-Aid Road 1,250M 82/90
MN Higher Education 10/2/79 First Mortgage Revenue 6,000M 82/2008
Facilities Authority Series Two-A
Winsted 10/2/79 G.O. Municipal Building 600M 81/2004
Stuntz 10/3/79 G.O. Temporary Improvement 665M 82
Minneapolis 10/4/79 Public Parking Facility 9,145M 82/2001
Minneapolis 10/4/79 Various Purpose 2,610M 80/89
Minneapolis 10/4/79 River Terminal Refunding 5,175M 80/99
Champlin 10/9/79 G.O. Improvement 900M 81/96
Inver Grove Heights 10/9/79 G.O. Water Revenue 390M 81/95
Twin Valley 10/9/79 G.O. Street Improvement 370M 82/91
Moose Lake-Windemere 10/10/79 Temp. G.O. Sanitary Sewer 1,O05M 82
(Carlton & Pine Counties) System Improvement
No. St. Paul 10/15/79 G.O. Improvement, 1979 1,350M 82/96
Moorhead 10/15/79 G.O. Improvement series B 2,000M 82/2001
Aurora 10/15/79 Grant Antic. Cert. of Indebt. 3OOM 81
Faribault 10/16/79 G.O. Municipal Bldg., 1979 1,045M 82/2002
New Berlin Sch. Dist. 10/17/79 Promissory Notes 225M 85
Hastings 10/22/79 G.O. Improvement series B 1,700M 82/2002
Cottage Grove 10/29/79 Improvement 2,335M 81/97
Morris 10/30/79 G.O. Water & Sewer Revenue 850M 82/99
Montevideo 11/5/79 G.O. Improvement 625M 81/91
Lakeville 11/5/79 G.O. Improvement 1,O15M 82/91
Savage 11/5/79 G.O. Improvement 1,O00M 82/89
Cloquet 11/6/79 G.O. Improvement 440M 82/96
WISCONSIN
Net
Rate
6.860%
6.738%
6.396%
6.483%
6.052%
6.281%
5.945%
6.40%
6.43%
6.42%
6.606%
5.912%
6.170%
7.00%
6.330%
6.679%
6.876%
6.225%
5.939%
7.798%
6.96%
6.493%
6.092%
5.819%
6.024%
6.908%
6.689%
6.960%
7.00%
6.807%
6.88%
6.985%
6.881%
6.592%
6.99%
6.966%
6.985%
6.702%
6.78%
6.945%
6.822%
Dow-Jones Bond
Indax ~at{ng
7.22% NR
7.22% NR
7.22% Baa-1
7.22% Baa-1
7.22% A
7.22% A
7.22% A-1
7.27% Baa-1
7.27I Baa-1
7.27% Baa-1
7.27% NR
7.27% A-1
7.27% A-1
7.27% NR
7.27% Baa-1
7.35% Baa-1
7.35% Baa-1
7.35% A
7.35% A-1
7.35% Baa-1
7.35% Baa
7.35% A
7.35% Aaa
7.35% Aaa
7.35% Aaa
7.40% Baa-1
7.40% A
7.40% Baa
7.40% A
7.67% A
7.67% A
7.67% NR
7.67% A-1
7.67% A
7.76% A
7.76% A
7.76% A
7.67% A
7.67% A
7.67% Baa
7.67% A
6.071%
5.710%
6.162%
Superior 9/12/79 Corporate Purpose 5,675M 82/98
Madison 9/25/79 Series 1979 C Full Faith 90,O00M 80/2004
and Credit Bonds
Middleton-Cross Plains 10/2/79 High School Building 5,000M 82/99
area School District
Prescott 10/16/79 Promissory Notes 1,000M 82/89 7.194% 7.67% Baa-1
Sheboygan County 10/23/79 G.O. County Building 6,350M 81/93 6.595% 7.76% Aa
Milton 10/24/79 Corporate Purpose 1,605M 85/99 7.104% 7.76% A
Plover (Village) 10/24/79 Corporate Purpose 1,500M 82/94 6.993% 7.76% A
Cameron 10/30/79 Corporate Purpose Notes 3005! 81/89 7.21% 7.76% NR
Wauwatosa 11/6/79 Bridge Bonds series 1979 2,750M 81/94 6.344% 7.67% Aaa
7.22%
7.27%
7.35%
A
Aaa
A-1
IOWA
Davenport 9/5/79
Buena Vista County 9/10/79
Buena Vista County 9/10/79
Ames 10/2/79
Lake Mills 10/22/79
Sioux City 10/23/79
Corp. Purp. Unlim. Tax 5,600M 80/94
Public Hospital Revenue 1,000M 80/96
Public Hospital Unlim. Tax 2,000M 81/96
G.O. Corporate Purpose ' 4,405M 81/99
Electric Revenue 2,130M 81/99
Various Unlimited Tax 2,685M 83/93
5.61%
6.252%
5.644%
5.858%
7.498%
6.486%
7.13%
7.22%
7.22%
7.35%
7.76%
7.76%
Aaa
A
A
Aa
A
Aa
NORTH AND SOUTH DAKOTA
Bismarck, ND 9/5/79
Devils Lake, ND ISD #1 9/11/79
Bismarck, ND 10/2/79
Bismarck, ND 10/2/79
Wahpeton, ND 10/15/79
Jamestown, ND 10/15/79
Cando, ND 10/29/79
Temp. Improvement Warrants 2,500M 82
School Building 620M 83/89
G.O. Hwy & Arterial Street 1,265M 80/94
Refunding Improve. series H 4,375M 80/93
Refunding Improvement 640M 81/99
Refunding Improve. series H 3,270M 81/90
Refunding Improvement 495M 81/95
'6.594%
5.819%
5.937%
5.845%
6.992%
6.530%
7.23%
7.13%
7.22%
7.35%
7.35I
7.67%
7.67%
7.76%
NR
A
Aa
Aa
A-1
A
NR
11-27-79
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
November 14, 1979
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-416
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Recommendation
At the November 12th Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission
considered a land division:
Lots 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 less cul-de-sac, in Block 15, Ayalon.
Zoned A-1 10,000 Square Feet for a single family dwelling
The Planning Commission recommended the land be divided into two parcels:
Parcel A - Lots 10 and 16 and that part of Lots 11 and 15 lying easterly
of the westerly 15 feet thereof except cul-de-sac, Block 15,
Avalon
Parcel B - Lots 12, 13 and 14 and the westerly 15 feet of Lots 11 and 15,
except cul-de-sac, Block 15, Avalon
The Administration concurs~
. APPLI OF LAND
ATION FOR SUBDIVISION
Sec. 22.03-a
VILLAGE OF MOUND
FEE OWNER
PLAT
PARCEL
~--//~
Location and complete legal description of property to be divided:
· ~ o 7'5 - /~,/~/;~, 13, ,; ~/sT/~
ZONING
To be divided as follows:
,
(attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed
building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number)
A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR:
New Lot No. From
Square f.eet TO Square feet
¢/~/si gnatu re~J TEL. NO.
ADDRESS ~--~'~Z~ ~Z-¢~-,~-~ ~.- DATE
Applicant's interest in the property:
This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan-
ation given why this is not the case.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
DATE
:
i
0 ~ ~
¢ ul 0 0
0 0
.¢ ¢ ¢ ¢
(!.
COMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS i LAND SURVEYORS Ia SiTE PLANNERS
November 27, 1979
Reply To:
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(612) 559-3700
Mr. Leonard Kopp
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota
55364
Subject:
City of Mound
Variance Request
Lot 8, Skarp & Lindquists Ravenswood
Dear Mr. Kopp:
We have inspected the site of the proposed garage on Lot 8 Skarp &
Lindquists Ravenswood and have the following comments:
The proposed garage is 10 feet off the edge of the right of way on
Edgewater Drive which has a 35 to 50 foot plotted right of way. In
our Preliminary Engineering Report for the 1980 Street Construction, we
will recommend that Edgewater be built narrower than 28 foot back
to back of curb. In this area the street should be shifted in the right
of way away from Lot 8 because of the proximity of an existing garage
and retaining wall on the lot west of Lot 8. This would leave from 16
to 18 feet from the proposed curb line on Edgewater to the proposed garage.
There are several garages on Edgewater which are this close or closer
to the street. The proposed location is the only practical location for a
detached garage on the lot because of steep slope further off the R.O.W.
The property owners plan to retain the existing off street parking
area east of the proposed garage.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Lyle Swanson, P.E.
LS:sc
#2113
Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls
11-27-79
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
November 14, 1979
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-418
SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land - Lot 1, Block 3, Devon
The owner of Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 3, Devon, Mrs. Kenneth Hoffman, has
requested the purchase of Lot 1 which is tax forfeit.
The City has taken for street purposes the southeasterly 10 feet of the
lot plus a 30 foot triangle at the corner of Hanover and Island View
Drive for street purposes which makes this a small lot.
The original sewer and water assessments remain on the property except
$46.39 paid on them. The assessments are:
Levy Project Amt. Assessed Amt. Paid Balance
3180 Sanitary Sewer $146.00 $5.66 $140.34
3388 S~wer Lateral 602.36 25.39 576.97
3397 Island Park Water 364.22 15.34 348.88
Balance $1066.19
About 80% of the purchase price of $400 will be applied
to Special Assessment Payment or
-320.00
$ 746.19
It is recommended the lot be sold for the following:
County Sale Price
State Tax
City's Cost
Balance of Special Assessments
Less Recovered Specials From Sale
Total
$400.00
12.00
250.00
746.19
$1408.19
A resolution authorizing the Mayor and Manager to purchase and resell
the lot is requested.
cc: Mrs. K. Hoffman
/ /
11~27-79
CITY OF HOUND
Hound, Hinnesota
November 20, 1979
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-423
SUBJECT: Beachside
Attached hereto is a proposed resolution which provides for dividing the
Beachside Land at the 931.5 foot mark.
The entire resolution is a stipulation for settling the discussions being
held on the Beachside property. Please note that the resolution provides
that this stipulation covers the land dedication required when the land
is subdivided.
This will be listed on the November 27, 1979 agenda.
cc: Earl Nelson
C MBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS lB LAND SURVEYORS [] SITE PLANNERS
EASTERLY PARCEL
Reply
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(612) 559-3700
That part of the north 637.50 feet of Lot B, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT D,
according the the recorded plat thereof, lying south of the westerly
extension of the south line of Lot 13 of said SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT D.
ALSO
That part of the north 637.50 feet of Lot 34, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION No.
170, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying south of the westerly
extension of the south line of said Lot 13, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT D. ALSO
That part of Lots 19 and 20, of said AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION No. 170 and
that part of Lot 32, THE BARTLETT PLACE, UPPER LAKE MINNETONKA,
according to the recorded plat thereof and all of Lots 28 thru 31, of
said THE BARTLETT PLACE, UPPER LAKE MINNETONKA, described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the east line of Lot 20, of said
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION No. 170 with the westerly extension of the
south line of Lot 13, of said SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT D; thence on an
assumed bearing of West, along a line parallel with the north line
of Lot 20, of said AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION No. 170, a distance of
51.00 feet; thence South 46 degrees West, 88.00 feet; thence South
40 degrees West, 121.00 feet; thence South 32 degrees West, 129.00
feet; thence South 17 degrees East, 89.00 feet; thence South
8 degrees East, 201.00 feet; thence South 19 degrees West, 67.00
feet; thence South 41 degrees West, 58.00 feet; thence South 63
degrees 30 minutes West, 59.00 feet; thence South 5 degrees 30
minutes West, 120.00 feet to the northeasterly extension of the
northerly line of Lot 18 of said AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION No. 170;
thence northeasterly along said northeasterly extension line, to
the intersection with the west line of Lot 20, of said AUDITOR'S
SUBDIVISION No. 170; thence southerly along said west line, to the
northwest corner of Lot 32, of said THE BARTLETT PLACE, UPPER LAKE
MINNETONKA; thence southeasterly to a point on the southerly line
of said Lot 32 distant 20.00 feet northeasterly of the southwest
corner of said Lot 32; thence northeasterly along the southerly lines
of Lots 32, 31, 30, 29 and 28, of said THE BARTLETT PLACE, UPPER
LAKE MINNETONKA, to the southeast corner of said Lot 28; thence
northerly along the east line of said Lot 28, to the northeast
corner of said Lot 28; thence northeasterly along the southerly line
of Lot 20, of said AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION No. 170, to the southeast
corner of said Lot 20; thence northerly along the east line of said
Lot 20, to the point of beginning.
Date: 11/21/79
#5187
(Contains 5.9 acres, more or less)
Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria: Granite Falls
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
tONSULT~NG EN{~INEER~ ! LAND SUDV~:YOD~ D ~T~: PLANNER~
Reply To:
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
{612) 559-3700
WESTERLY PARCEL
That part of the north 637.50 feet of Lot B, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT D,
according the the recorded plat thereof, lying north of the westerly
extension of the south line of Lot 13 of said SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT D.
ALSO
That part of.the north 637.50 feet of Lot 34, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION No.
170, according to the recorded plat thereo£, lying north of the westerly
extension of the south line of said Lot 13, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT D. ALSO
That part of Lots 19 and 20, of said AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION No. 170,
according to the recorded plat thereof, described as followsJ
Beginning at the intersection of the east line of Lot 20, of said
AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION No. 170 with~the westerly_ext.ension of the
south line of Lot 13, of said SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT D; thence on an
assumed bearing of West, along a line parallel with the north line
of Lot 20, of said AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION No. 170, a distance of
51.00 feet; thence South 46 degrees West, 88.00 feet; thence South
40 degrees West, 121.00 feet; thence South 32 degrees West, 129.00
feet; thence South 17 degrees East, 89.00 feet; thence South
8 degrees East, 201.00 feet; thence South 19 degrees West, 67.00
feet; thence South 41 degrees West, 58.00 feet; thence South 63
degrees 30 minutes West, 59.00 feet; thence South 5 degrees 30
minutes West, 120.00 feet to the northeasterly extension of the
northerly line of Lot 18 of said AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION No. 170;
thence southwesterly along said northeasterly extension line and the
northerly line of said Lot 18, to the southwest corner of Lot 19, of
said AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION No. 170; thence northerly along the west
line of said Lot 19, to the northwest corner of said Lot 19; thence
east along the north line of said Lots 19 and 20, to the northeast
corner of said Lot 20; thence southerly along the east line of said
lot 20, to the point of beginning.
Date: 11/21/79
#5187
Minneapolis- Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls
prir~ted r;n :ec¥c;ed pape:
STIPULATION OF SETTLEME~T AND JOINT REQUEST
OF BEACHSIDE DEVELOPERS, INC. AND THE CITY
OF MOUND TO BOARD OF HEN~EPIN COUNTY COM/~ISSIONERS
WHEREAS, Beachside Developers, Inc., was the fee owner of
Parcel 5915, Plat 61290, District 85, City of Mound, containing
approximately 18 3/4 acres of land, and
WHEREAS, on March 13, 1979, said parcel was forfeited to
the State of Minnesota for failure to pay taxes which were bid in
by the State of Minnesota on May 14, 1973, for delinquent taxes for
the year 1972, and ·
WHEREAS, the County of Hennepin acting through Wayne A.
Johnson, County Auditor, by Gordon L. Ramm, Deputy, properly served
notice upon the fee owners that the land. was to go tax forfeit "and in
respects complied with all state statutes relating to delinGuent
taxes and tax forfeiture, and
WHEREAS, on or about March 22, 1979, the prior owner,
Beachside Developers, Inc., and the City of Mound both contacted
Hennepin County and the prior owner indicated a desire to repurchase
said lands pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282.421, and. the City of
Mound indicated to Hennepin County its desire to claim said land
for public purposes, and
WHEREAS, Beachside DeveloDers, Inc. have executed a
request to repurchase said lands and the City of Mound. also filed
two separate applications by a governmental subdivision for
conveyance of tax forfeited lands to the City to be used for the
following public purposes: streets, utilities~, park and wetlands; and
WHEREAS, %he prior owner and the City have both requested %he
Board. of County Commissioners of Hennepin County to rule in their
favor and to convey the lands or execute a repurchase agreement and
the County administration has deferred referring the matter to the
Board of Commissioners because of the legal questions and legal
rights of the parties and has sought advice from the County Attorney,
and
WHEREAS, the City of Mound and Beachside Developers, Inc.,
have met and conferred and it has been determined by the parties
that lands lying below the elevation of 931.5 are wetlands and that
the owner could not build on said lands as they are within the
flood plain of the City of Mound, and
WHEREAS, the parties have now reached agreement as to which
lands can be conveyed to Beachside Developers, Inc., and which lands
can be released to the City of Mound for public purposes and have
further agreed to waive any and all claims they may have against
Hennepin County or the State of Minnesota,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED By and between
Beachside Developers, Inc., and the City of Mound, as follows:
1. The parties jointly petition the Board of County
Commissioners to convey to the City of Mound the following described
~portion of _Parcel 5915, Plat 61290, District 85, City of Mound:
and the parties jointly petition the Board of County Commissioners
to authorize %he repurchase by Beachside Developers, Inc. of the
following described portion of said parcel:
2. The parties agree that the joint request set forth in
paragraph 1 is in the best interests of Beachside Developers, Inc.
as a private property owner and the City of Mound representing the
public interest and that said division will preserve and serve the
public interest in this property and further that by such a finding
the Board of County Commissioners can determine that any undue
hardship or injustice resulting from the tax f~rfeiture will be
corrected and the public interest preserved.
3.. The parties further agree that if the County Board
approves the above described division of land and conveys to the
City of Mound for public purposes its share of said lands and.
authorizes Beachside Developers, Inc. to repurchase the balance
of said land, then and in that case the City and the developer
release any and all claims they may have against the County of
Hennepin and the State of Minnesota relating to the tax forfeiture
and the process %under which the parties have pursued their rights
in this action. They further agree to hold the County of Hennepin
and the State of Minnesota harmless and reauest that said settlement
be approved as aforedescribed to amicably settle the dispute which
has arisen between the parties. The City of Mound has also agreed
that upon approval of this Stipulation and conveyance of said. lands,
Beachside Developers, Inc. will have satisfied any and all parks
and wetlands dedication required under its subdivision ordinance
for these properties.
CITY OF MOUND
By
City Manager
~Approved by the City Council
By
M ay or
BEACHSIDE DEVELOPERS, INC.
By
Its
By
Its
3 3L
~27-79
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
November 20, 1979
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-424
SUBJECT: Fire Department Salaries
The Fire Chief has indicated that the Firemen would like a pay increase.
They are presently receiving for fighting fires:
Chief $4.00 per hour
Assistant Chief 3.75 per hour
Firefighter 3.50 per hour
In addition, the budget for 1979 carried the following salaries for officers:
Fire Chief
Assistant Chief
Fire Marshall
Drill Master
Captains
Lieutenants
Preventative Maintenance
$3,600. Annual
1,O00 Annual
3O0
4OO
140
100
5,4OO
The Fire Department requested the following salaries for 1980:
Fire Chief $4,000· Annual ~ ~O
Assistant Chief 1,200.
Fire Marshall 500.
Drill Master 400.
Captains 150
Lieutenants 110. ~o
Preventative Maintenance 6,000.
At budget time, the one committee of the Fire Department discussed increas-
ing the pension plan with no salary increase. The pension plan was in-
creased.
This will be on the November 27th agenda.
cc: G. Garvais
Le~onara I_. r~opp , ~
3 23,.
Box 37, Mound, Minnesot2 55364
TO: City of Mound
City Manager
FROM: Mound Volunteer Fire Department
SUBJECT: Hourly Wage Increase
November 26, 1979
Mr. Kopp:
The members of the Mound Volunteer Fire Department request a salary increase
to $5.00 per man hour. We have gone 10 yea~s without a pay increase and we
feel that with the cost of living increase that this increase is well justified. This
would then be $5.50 per Chief man hour; $5.25 per Assistant Chief man hour;
and $5.00 per firefighter man hour.
Respectfully,
Lawrence J. Heitz, Jr.
Mound Fire Department
By Action of the Board of Directors
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
November 20, 1979
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-426
SUBJECT: Parking Permit
Attached is a copy of a Winter Parking Permit request for 4705 Bedford
Road until the driveway is finished.
The permit is recommended by the Public Works Director.
x~--~l_e~nard L. Kopp ~'/
'N'd
~OKV~I~dO ONI~RhV~1%~V~I.S ~0 cJ~g~'l.b~'-~ SOKVIttYA
Mr. & Mrs. Richard Hawks
2072 Commerce Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364
November 27, 1979
Mound City Council
5341Maywood Rd.
Mound, MN 55364
Gentlemen:
The Boys Brigade from Calvary Memorial Church, Navarre, Minnesota, requests
permission to sell Christmas Trees this year at 2072 Commerce Blvd., Mound,
MN, the Richard Hawks residence.
Boys Brigade is a non-profit Christian out-reach program for boys age six to
19.
They are planning to have a snow fence aroupd the tress and put a mobile home
in the yard so as to deter possible thefts.
Permission to sell these trees has been given to this organization to use our
-yard with the approval of the City Council.
Thank you for your cooPeration in this matter.
S J ncere/,l:~,
Shirley Hawks
P.S. 2072 Commerce Blvd. is presently zoned Residential B
11-27-79
CITY OF MOUND
Mound! Minnesota
November 14~ 1979
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-417
SUBJECT:, Three Way Stop at Idlewood and Oaklawn
Attached is a copy of a letter from Sargeant Roy suggesting a three way
stop sign at Oaklawn and Idlewood.'
" I do concur that it would be in
Comments from the Police Chief are, ..,
the best interests to place stop signs in the south and northbound lanes
of Oaklawn."
The Public Works Director quotes as follows: "I can see no reason that
we can't try a three-way stop at Oaklawn and Idlewood. The only question
that comes to my mind, is that once we start doing this, will we receive
more requests for three-way stops? This situation exists on many of the
streets in Mound."
It is recommended the Council ask the Attorney to draw an Ordinance of
either a 3 way stop or stop on Oaklawn only. The Administration recom-
mends a three way stop.
~'--Le~ard L. Kop~~
3 g,.,
FROM:
SUBJECT:
IrEROP CE
Leonard Kopp - City Man. ager
Sgt. Brad Roy
Stop Signs
DATE. Novem. be _r_ 7
_19..79.
It has com~ to my attention over the past year on several occasions
that there are speeders who are driving on Oaklawn near the intersection
of Idlewood in the city.of Mound in a careless manner. I have resolved
to take care of this problem in the past by replacing the missing stop
sign oh Idlewood and have secured "Slow-Children Playing" signs for
Oaklawn Lane. in.spite of this action and attempts at enforcement on
the part of the Mound policedepartment, the problem persists. This is
due, in fact, to the sporatic traffic flow at this location, making it
difficult to run radar effectively.
In terms of dollars and cents, I feel it would be a savi.ngs to the
city to post the intersection of Oaklawn and Idlewood a three-way stop
rather than the present one-way stop. Considerably less expense ~ould
be involved than to post an.officer with radar at this location on a
long term basis.
The two complainants in this matter are Pat Bigaouette of'2920'Hazel-
wood, and Jane Johnson of 2943 Oaklawn. Both' ladies have talked to
.Sgt. Roy in the past about the matter and Mrs. Johnson relates that
yesterday, 11-6-79, her small child was brushed by a car and received
a very minor injury. The ladies' concern is that the next time it could
be a fatality.
It is my opinion that the problem could best be served by placement of
stop signs in the south and northbound lanes of Oaklawn.
~ ~'Since[~lY' ~
Sgt. B.K. 'Roy~
BKR:lao
79
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
November 19, 1979
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-420
SUBJECT: County Road llO Construction
The County has considered the parking area along County Road llO just
north of Lynwood and feel that the best solution is parallel parking
(see letter attached).
The County is requesting the City to consider the parallel parking.
Does the Council wish to reconsider this matter? If so, do you wish
the merchants' involved invited to such a meeting.
Le~n';rd L. Kopp ,' V
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
320 Washington Av. South
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
935-3381
November 15, 1979
Mr. Leonard Kopp
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
CSAH 110, H C PROJECT 7002
PARKING FOR BUSINESSES NORTH OF LYNWOOD
Dear Mr. Kopp:
Hennepin County has considered the parking area for the businesses north of
Lynwood behind the new curb and gutter with an entrance and exit off CSAH
110 as proposed by the .City Council at their meeting on October 23, 1979.
We do not feel that this proposal is the best solution; therefore, we are
again asking for approval of the parallel parking lane scheme as submitted
to the Council.
Please call us if you have any questions about our proposal.
S~'~-' c rely, /n
Don S. Spielmann
Chief, Design Division
awh/lar
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunity employer
11-27-79
CITY OF HOUND
Mound, Minnesota
November 20, 1979
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-421
SUBJECT: Commercial Dock Ordinance
Under the present Commercial Dock Ordinance, we charge S25 fee plus $1.50
per dock. (Section 4l:25 City Code)
We have checked other communities and find:
Orono - A new applicant pays a $300 fee plus $2.00 per slip on land
or in the water. On renewal, the fee is $100 plus $2.00 per
slip. There is an additional charge of Sl.O0 for any boat
:stored on the property if the boat is used.
Greenwood - $10 fee plus .35¢ each slip on water and 25¢ each slip
on the lake.
This makes 110 slips for $48.50.
116 slips for $50.60.
Attached is a copy of a survey made by the L.M.C.D.
It is recommended that the rates used by Orono be followed. The action
would be to have the Attorney prepare an amendment to the Ordinance.
cc: D. Rother
LeogarcF t~. r, opp -
6L-L-~
~'~ +
09+
-~$ +'
gE +
oLdS
~L~
o~
ItV
leto xommoo
: ~ XeAV
Om
og +
OO9
009. '9
%
oOL$
(~$ :~A~)
~ 0~+
~6 +
(o~s :~Aa)
x~uo O~
'8
% ~L +
L~$ +
$o · ~mV
6L6~ ·
0~ :se~uo~
06'.'$ :see
6L61, - oL6
6~S T~¥AqIR'~ &i"IS
Lake municipal'dock rates
riding rising tide of inflation
By DOUG HOVELSON
Municipal dock users around Lake
Minnetonka will be paying more rent
this year, in most cases. Five cities,
Wayzata, Tonka Bay, Deephaven,
Excelsior and Mound, operate
municipal docks.
Three of those cities, Wayzata, Ex-
celsior and Mound, have passed rate
increases effective this spring.
Deephaven's rates did not rise, and
Tonka Bay is still considering
Whether to increase its fees.
Municipal docking privileges are
still uniformly cheaper than private
operations. But the private users
have the advantage of better secu-
rity. But not everybody can use the
municipal docks. Waiting lists are
apt to be long, sometimes extending
back several years. And the docks
are a hot commodity. Getting a slip
on a municipal dock is like getting
Viking season'tickets: previous hold-
ers get first shot. And they. don't give
up their space without good reason.
The folloWing is a city by city de-
scription of dock rates and policies·
WAYZATA
Two weeks ago, the Wayzata City
Council approved rate changes for
1979 and 1980. Until' this year,
Wayzata was a very good deal if you
could get your boat in a slip there. It's
still not a bad deal. But rates jumped
well over 100 per cent in both the
· inner and outer lagoon.
All told, Wayzata has between 75
and 80. The total won't be definite
until the refinishing work is com-
pleted this spring. Rates for 1979 are
described as interim; another fee
schedule will go into effect in '1980.
. For 1979, a slip will run you $150 in
the outer lagoon. Last year; it was
$50. Next year, it will be $250. There
are 45 slips there.
In the inner lagoon, a slip that cost
$30 last year will cost $120 this year.
In 1980, the fee will be $200.
The very small slips, for small fish-
ing boats and the like, will be $80 this
year, compared to $50 last year. The
cost will be the same in 1980. (All
rates are seasonal.)
City residents g~t preference'on the
application list. People who had slips
last year get first crack. Non-
residents can apply. B. ut it's been
quite awhile since a non-Wayzatan
got a slip..
The city expects to raise about
$10,000 from the docks this year. Next
year's increases will bring that fig-
ure to about .$18,000. The money is
used to maintain the docks. The pro-
jected revenue is figured into the
bond issue just authorized by the
council for the Lake St. project. The
city needs that $18,000 each year as
part of the bond sale.
DOCK FEES
To page A6
From page A1
MOUND
.When word got out about the
municipal dock rate increase in
Mound this year, the telephone
started ringing at city hall. Irate citi-
zens demanded to know why the city
was doing this to them, said 'City
Manager Leonard Kopp. '
The rate went from a minimum of
$10 to a minimum of $25. The average
cost per dock will not be much higher
than $25, said Kopp. That's a lot
lower than any other city.
The increase was necessary to
cover the cost of dock inspections,
Kopp said. Up until now, the city has
been subsidizing the boat owners, he
said. And the city doesn't want to do
that anymore.
Mound does do things differently.
Boat owners pay the fee to the city to
rent space on public lands, and then
must put up their own docks. Because
of that investment, there isn't much
of a turnover.
The $25 is the minimum charge.
The city measures the width of each
dock, and charges $3.50 per foot, or
the $25, whichever is greater. Last
year, it was $3.50.
The docks are at the Commons, and
residents living behind the park get
first priority. Other city residents fire
second in priority, and non-residents
third. Kopp said last year about 30
people didn't get permits. There are
380 permits available.
The city brought in $5,200 last year,
,and had expenses of roughly $13,000.
iTONKA BAY
In Tonka Bay, the council is still
mulling over whether to inereas~ the
municipal rates this year or not. The
going rate for the 37 docks is $150 for
the first 15 feet of boat length and $15
per foot thereafter.
City policy is to rent slips first to
those who had them last year, with
other Tonka Bay residents next in
line. After them comes ex-dock hol-
ders who don't live in Tonka Bay, and
finally, non-residents who have never
rented space before.
^ waiting list is maintained, but
there is a good turnover. Residents'
have until May 1 to sign up. Last
year, 13 non-residents got dock
space.
The city uses the revenue raised to
help maintain the docks.
DEEPHAVEN
Deephaven raised its rates in 1978,
and so won't raise them this year.
The city has six kinds of. facilities,
with about 250 spaces available.
Facilities are on both Carsons and St.
Louis bays.
At the docks, a flat $8 per foot
length of boat is charged. The max-
imum permissible length is 24 feet.
Buoys in both bays are $75 per sea-
son. Slides are $20, as are canoe
racks. ·
Shore space is available on St.
Louis Bay, for owners to put up their
own docks. The city charges $5 per
running foot of shoreline:
Patience can be a real virtue in
Deephaven. Each facility has its Own
waiting list, and some of them are
quite long. For instance, about 20
people who signed up for dock space
in 1976, are still waiting. Once on a
'waiting list, you can stay in
chronological order--if you renew
your application every Nov. 15. Ybu
can be on every list if you like.
The city raises about $16,500 from
its docking operations. Last year that
money was used to put in all new.
docks in Carson's Bay. The year be-
fore, new docks were installed On St.
Louis Bay.
EXCELSIOR
It will cost more to use the munici-
pal docks in Excelsior this season.
Rates were recently increased by the
city council. Residential dock fees
went from $6 to $8 per linear foot of a
boat. There is a 15 foot minimum.
Non-residents pay even more.
Their rates went from $10 per foot to
$15, with the same 15 foot minimum.
Thus the 'minimum charge is $225.
Buoy renters will pay $125 this
'year, up from $75 last year. Slide
users will pay $35, up from $20.
There are somewhere between 95
and 125 buoy spaces in Excelsior,
another 26 spaces at the wet'docks
and about 44 slide' spaces, some of
them attached to buoys.
. Last year, Excelsior brought in
$5,678 from its docking operations.
This year,'the figure will be much
.~higher, although no one knows how
high, because of the change to charg-
ing per length of boat at the wet
docks. In the past, the footage of the
i dock used was calculated for the fee.
The rate increases were asked for
by the Park and Recreation Dept. to
cover the costs of maintaining the
· docks.
. fi ,,Tonka Bay to Repair
Manitou Channel
The repair of the Manito'u
Channel and the increase of
dock rental charges were among
important .matters discussed at
Tonka Bay council meeting
March 13.
After much discussion over
the past year, the council find
ally agreed to proceed with the
repair of the channel (located .
on the SW corner of Gideon's·
Bay). The work will cost about
$38,500 plus cleanup costs and
engineering fees. The total cost
will be assessed to property o~n-
ers located on the channel and
will amount to about $2,000
each, or an annual assessment
· of approximately $300 over a
10-year period.
Village dock rental charges
for the year have been increased
to $165 per 15-foot boat and
$16.50 for each additional foot.
Tonka Bay residents are object-
ing to the increase and also to
the fact that they pay the same
rate as outsiders. Ed Bauman,
councilman, said whatever funds
they have on hand and-will be
collected are needed to repair
docks as they are in bad shape.
Gordon Schmidt, operator of
Crosstown Rubbish haulers, has
requested a renewal of his con-
tract. He was commended for
his good work but the council
decided to hold the contract
open for bids.
An ordinance prohibiting
'the use of all firearms, including
BB guns, was approved as one of
the final actions for the ev_ening
by the council.
3zzr
1 -27-79
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
November 15, 1979
COUNCI£ MEMORANDUM NO. 79-419
SUBJECT: Bus Passenger Shelters
Attached is a copy of a letter from Metropolitan Transit Commission
about bus shelters.
Does the Council have other locations to suggest?
· eonara L. ~opp ! ·
Met '
ropolitan Transit Commission
~ 801 ,American Center Building
November 9, 1979
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612/221-0939
Mr. Leonard L. Kopp
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
RE: 1980 Passenger Waiting Shelter Program
Request for Site Recommendations
Dear Mr.. Kopp:
During the past seven years, the Metropolitan Transit Commission has
installed approximately 600 passenger waiting shelters throughout the
metropolitan area. Many of the shelter sites were identified and
recommended by the cities in which they are located. The input from
the cities has been valuable in assisting the MTC to locate the shelters
where they would best serve the needs of the cities and their residents.
At this time, the MTC is initiating work on a passenger waiting shelter
program for 1980. Unlike earlier programs which each included from
75 to 130 passenger waiting shelters, the 1980 Passenger Waiting
Shelter Program will include 20 shelters. The size of the program
has been reduced because of the ongoing maintenance and repair costs
of the approximately 600 passenger waiting shelters previously installed
by the MTC.
Although the 1980 shelter program will be smaller than those of
previous years, we feel it is important to have the cities recommend
sites for the MTC's consideration. Therefore, we are requesting that
you provide a list of up to three shelter locations to be considered
for the MTC's 1980 Passenger Waiting Shelter Program. It is doubtful
that more than one shelter in any given city will be installed; there-
fore, we are requesting that your shelter recommendations be prioritized
so that the MTC staff may initiate work on the highest priority site
first. Should this site not receive the adequate approvals, the MTC
staff would then initiate work on the second and third priority sites.
%~/Encl°sed'~'i~~'~-~-----"-, alistofpotential sheltersitespreviously identified
by the MTC for your city. This
.~your priority list. list may assist you in establishing
If possible, please provide us with your shelter site recommendations
by December 15, 1979. Should you wish to discuss further the MTC's
1980 Passenger Waiting Shelter Program and potential shelter sites
within your city, please feel free to call.
Sincerely~
/
David R. Jess~p
Project Ma/n~ger
15 & Bartlett Blvd.
DRJ/njh
C.R. 125 & Brighton Blvd.
Mound
Load Count
5
5
Direction
Inbound
Inbound
I1
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
November 19, 1979
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-422
SUBJECT: Planning Agreement
Attached is a copy of a proposed agreement with the Planner.
The agreement is to begin January 1st and will pay $500 a month
for specified services. Additional services will be at the scale
set forth in the Contract.
The agreement has a 30 day cancellation clause.
It is recommended the Mayor and the Manager be authorized to enter
into the agreement.
~--~Le~nard L. Kopp'-
ISBERG, RIESENBERG, CHELSETH
AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
2116 Second Avenue South. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404
612-871-5628
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL PLANNING SERVICES
FOR THE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of November, 1979, by and between the
City of Mound, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter
referred to as the "City"), and Isberg, Riesenberg, Chelseth and Associates, Inc.,
with offices at 2116 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota (herein referred to
as "Consultant").
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the Consultant to furnish professional planning
services to assist the City in planning and administration of its Community Develop-
merit Block Grant Program and other miscellaneous planning tasks as they arise,
NOW THEREFORE, the City and Consultant agree as follows:
I. Scope of Services of Consultant
The Consultant, under the immediate supervision and direction of the City
Manager, shall perform the work to the satisfaction of the City Manager,
consisting of the following:
CDBG Program
Annual application preparation, HAP preparation, program execution, performance
reports, liaison with Hennepin County, along with any specific administrative
exercises, i.e., land acquisition, relocation, labor standards, equal opportunity.
II.
III.
Supervision of Consultant
The services performed by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be reviewed
by the City Manager on a continuing basis. Prior to the final preparation and
completion of the reports, maps, and other documents specified in this Agreement,
the Consultant shall make available such reports, maps, or other documents in
preliminary form to the City Manager for discussion, review and approval.
Work Schedule
The planner-in-charge shall spend an average of one day per week at the Mound
City Hall in performing said services, unless attendance at outside CDBG meeting
is called for. The day selected shall be regularily scheduled.
Planning and Development Services
IV. Support Staff and Materials
In performing the ongoing CDBG program planning and administration, clerical,
typing and application takings shall be provided by city staff. All program
materials and xeroxing shall also be provided by the City.
V. Consultant's Staff
None of the Consultant's services specified in this Agreement shall be sub-
contracted by the Consultant without prior written approval of the City
Manager. Charles Riesenberg will be the planner-in-charge.
VI. Compensation and Method of ~ayment
The cost for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement will be $500 per month.
The Consultant shall submit to the City monthly invoices. These invoices shall
be due and payable to the Consultant within 45 days after their receipt by the
City.
VII. Additional Services Beyond the Scope of this Agreement
Upon direction from the City Manager and as the need arises, all professional
services of an ongoing basis beyond the scope of the agreement, including but
not limited to site and plan review, ordinance interpretations, Planning Commission
and City Council meetings, discussions and consultations on regularily scheduled
planning administration items such as rezonings, development proposals, conditional
use permits, and variances, etc., shall be performed by the Consultant by time
worked on the project at the following hourly rate.
Principal (Mr. Riesenberg)
Research Planner
Graphic Designer
Secretary
$20.00
$15.00
$12.00
$11.00
VIII. Termination ~
If for any reason the Consultan~ shall f~to FulFill ~+imPlv ~n~ nwn~nw
manne~ts obli~aL~ufl~ under this Agreemllql%'~=~,~~e Consultant shall vi~te
any..zzf the c$¥ana~lt=, ~gF~ements, or stipulations ot thiS Agreement, the Cl~y
ereupo ~g to terminate this Agreement by giving written
notice to the Consultant at least thirty (30) days before such termination.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Mound has authorized execution of this Agreement on the
day of November, 1979, and has caused this Agreement to be signed and executed
in its behalf by its Mayor and its City Manager. Isberg, Riesenberg, Chelseth and
Associates, Inc., has authorized execution of this Agreement on the [~-ql~.day of
November, 1979, and Gunnar C. Isberg and Charles E. Riesenberg its President and Vice
President have signed and executed this Agreement in its behalf the day and year first
above written. - ......
CITY OF MOUND ISB~,RIESENBERG,CHEL~SET~I & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Pr si ent . ~/
Vice P~6sident ~
Mayor
City Manager
OCTOBER 1979
C~U ' y_T~_D E . --78. 333 %
IEPARTMENT 3UDGETED'~-~ RRE'NT EXP. 'ALL0~IED AC'iUAL
12011 COUNCIL $ 10,450.00 1,165.g0 11,524.93 370.79 1.1028
13012 HUMAN RIGHTS 360.00 425.90 299.98 1.1830
85,1 0.00 5,947.3 ' oTT i. 66 ........
)6014 ....... ELECIIONS 1,O80.O0 7.86 899.96 ' ~ ]'0073 I
' '1'°146 '
)7015 ASSESSING 33,055.09 150.OO 33 539.74 27,544.73
)9016 FINANCE 98,640.00 9,227.79 80,410.22 8~",196.71 - ........ .~152 -. !
11018 LEGAL 12,8OO.OO 2,561.67 14,852.20 10,666.24." 1.1603
11118 PROSECUTING I1',O55.OO 1,O60.O0 7,578]'50 9,21~.13 .'6855
14'O31 ....... POLICE . ...... 457,211.OO. 35,234.~8 382,995.21 380,993.92 ' ".8376 '--I
17032 FIRE.: .. 94,375,OO. .. . 4,204.66 67,787.28 '~8,642..68 . "'.71~0'
19033. INSPECTIONS .......... 26,960,00_.. 5,224.79 .... 20,446.53 22,465.76' .7584' ' 1
19933 PLANNING 20,550.00 3,839.46 18,039.49 17,124.31 ' 877'8 ·
~1034 CIVIL DEFENSE 15,140.OO 35.40 2,677.85 12,616.16` ' .1768
~8042 STREET. ........ 227,955.00_. 17',969.36 223',517.26 189'954'90 '
!9743 SHOP & STORE 35,485,00 2,082.60 24,O53.80 ~91'569'65 '
15847 DISEASED TREES 22,440,OO~ 4,247.50 10,533.79 18,699.25 ' '.4694'"
~4069 'PARKS 63,936,00 5,463.73 58,166.06 53,277.86 .9097
~1081C.E.T.A. 538~46 10,O10.77 i --
10082 TEMPORARY LABOR 11,O50,00 129.30 12,161.O5 "9,'2~7.96 ..... 1.1005
,5091 LIQUOR 165,905,OO 11,186.32 114,444.55 138,248.63 '.6898
0078 SEWER 379,676,00 24,845.61 276,373.47 316,384.O1 '.7279 '
01'73 WATER 226,191.00 13,535.59 170,121.24 18~,484.96 .'7521
5 REVENUE 'SHARING '42,314.O0 468.37 15,307.56 35,260.25 .3617
8 IMP EQUIP OUTLAY 108,941.O0 -- 23,671.26 90,780.53 .2172
O CEMETERY 5,335.00 50.00 906.55 4,445.65 .1699
2 RETIREMENT 83,O16.00 8,468.98 61,402.77 69,177.23 .7396
5 FIRE RELIEF 40,750.0O -- 10,342.56 33,956.97 .2538
5 WATER REVENUE 54,612~OO -- 31,O10.18 45;508.17 .5678
3 CONTINGENCY 20,OOO.00 -- · __ 16,666.OO --
TOTALS ~, ~54,/~62, OO 157,637.55 1,752,469.47 1,961,973- 18 .74~
Nov. 14, 1979
ATTORNEY ,AT t. AW
1503 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA I~5454
612/333-5419
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PERFORMED BY TIMOTHY L. PIEPKORN FOR THE CITY OF
MOUND FOR THE MONTH O~ OCTOBER~ 1979: , hours
1. October 4: Forseth Jury Trial ............................................ 2.00
2. October 5,6: Legal Memorandum; re: Shoop ................................. 4.00
3. October 9:3 Pre-Trial Conferences; 1 Court Trial; 1 sentencin§ ......... 3.50
4. October 10: Special Term Hearing; re: Trummer ............................. 1.50
5. October ll: 9 case summaries for Chief ................................... 2.00
6. October 22: Prepared 6 Formal Compl2ints .................................. 4.00
7. October 23: Arraignments; 6 Pre-Trial Conferences; 1 Court Trial ......... 2.50
8. October 24: Meeting at Mound Office with citizen .......................... 1.O0
21.50
TOTAL OWING ($300 for 15 hours and $30 for 6.50 hours) ................. $495.00
DISCOUNT .................................................................. 95.00
$400.00
3 lg
14A
· Minneapolis Tribune
Tues., Nov: 27, 1979
State unit urges cuts
in"phone, rate FeqU:'est
Associated Press ,- I ......... t ..... million.
The staff of the Minnesota Depart-
ment of Public SerVice recommend-
ed Monday that most of a $4.36 mil-
lion rate increase requested by Con-
tinental Telephone· Co. be denied.. ~
Eugene ~Avery, director of'the de-
partment, said the staff recOmmend-
ed that Continental receive a rate
crease of $900,623, about 20 percent
of the amount requested. ' .
Final decisions in rate Cases are
made by the five-member Public
Service Commission. It must decide
the Con,tinental case by May 10.
Continental serves 88,000 customers.
in Minnesota. It had sought a rate in-
crease that ~vould increase its annual
revenue ill the state tonearly $37.2
The department staff recommended
that Continental be granted a rate of
return of 7.8 percent, rather titan
9.0~ percent as requested.
The 'staff also reco~nmended that
Continental 'establish a :;ingle un~-
form rate for alt exclmnges outside
the Twin Cities metropolitan area
and that a uniform rate be estab,
lished for exchanges within' the 'I'~vm
Cities calling area.: :.,.: ... '
Continental serves a number of com-
munities scattered around the state
including International Falls, Two
Harbors, McGregor, McGrath, War-
ren, Blooming Prairie, Dodger Cen-
ter, Hector, Tyler, Lindstrom, Wyo-
ming, St. Bonifacius, Scandia, Ma
Plain and Mound.