The URL can be used to link to this page

82-08-24 CITY OF MOUND AGENDA Mound, Minnesota MOUND'CITY COUNCIL. Regular Meeting Tuesday, August 24, 1982 7:30 P.M. - City Na.ll ~ Minutes of August 10, 1982, Regular Meeting ~. Minutes of August 17, 1982, Special Meeting ~3~. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 3.2 Beer License to the Surfside, Inc. 2670 Commerce B. Delinquent UtilitY Bills ~o Set Date for Public Hearings for Special Assessment Roles: A. 1981 Street Light P~oject B. Count~ Road llO Improvement Project (Suggested Date for both - September 21, 1982) ~ Consideration of Issuance of Temporary Improvement Bonds to September 1, 1984 to Cover the Cost of C.S.A.H. Project Covering County Road 110 ~ Consideration of Quotations to Bituminous Surface the Area by the City Shop for Purposes of Storage of Salt/Sand and Control So~l Erosion. (To be handed out at meeting) Request of Arlys Gribovsky ~to Grant a One Year Extension on Variance - Approved August 11, 1981 Comments & Suggestions from Citizens Present (please limit to 3 minutes) License Application - Video Game - VFW Post 5113 Purchase of Administrative Cars as Authorized in City Budget of 1982 Request to Set a Public Hearing Date for a Conditional Use Permit for Jerry Rockvam~ 12. Amend Sign Ordinance - Section 55.38 to Authorize the Administrative Approval of Temporary Signs 13. Approval of Quotations for Repairing & Resurfacing Three Points Tennis Court 14. Payment of Bills 15. Set Budget Planning Dates - Suggest August 31~ Sept. 1 & 2 16o INFORMATION/MISCE£LANEOUS A. Proposed List of Public Facilities to Receive Free - Cable T.V. Drop B. League of Cities Regional Meeting - City of Maplewood - Who wants to go? Pg. 1935-1940 Pg. 1941-1942 Pg. 1943-1946 Pg. 1947 Pgo 1948 Pg. 1949-1950 Pg. 1951-1952 Pg. 1953-1954 Pg. 1955 Pg. 1956-1957 Pg. 1958 Pg. 1959-1966 Pg. 1967 Pg. 1968 Pg. 1969-1970 Pg. 1971 Pg. 1972 Pg. 1973-1974 Page 1934 Co D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. Lo Letter from Hennepin County Park Reserve Legion Post 398 Gambling Report VFW Post #5113 Gambling Report Westonka Chamber Waves Park Commission Minutes - June 10, 1982 Article from Minneapolis Tribune August 19, 1982 Pg. 1975-1976 Pg. 1977 Pg. 1978 · Pg. 1979-1980 Met. Council Rankings of Senior Citizens Housing Projects Pg. 1981-1982 Pg. 1983-1986 Pg. 1987-1988 Pg. 1989-1992 OccUpational Medical Clinic Material DAC Letter with Suggestions Letter from John Burger M. .Minnehaha Creek Watershed District - Agenda & Minutes N. Twin Cities Labor Market Information - August 0. Main Street Minnesota II Conference P. Hennepin County Census Report (Age & Sex Distribution) Pg Pg Pg Pg Pg Pg 1993-1998 1999 2000-2010 2Oll-2014 2015 2016-2028 Page 1934-a q~,!~ jo^ej ul t[:t!~ do^ej u! ~ - /Zlsno~u!ueun se~ ~:lo^ [te~ ((o~! / aq.L .uo!~,o,,, e popuooas /Xtsnom~.ueun se~ a:to~ tte~ tto~! / gq.l_ uo!~,ou., e p~puoo~s pue pa^ouJ ' ~v~-~-¢~ ~- q~!~ Jo^e~ u! ~:F~. /Xtsnom:u~un se~ ~o~ rte= troll / ~qJ. I..J']. I,.,'-t JO^eJ. ll I. ~ /AtsnouJ~.ueun se~ ~o^ tte~ troll / ~qt uo!3ou~ e p~puoo~s ~ -',~"~'.~e~,}~ pue p~^ocu- "o~'w~)'~. /Atsno~u!ueun se~ ~3o^ lie3 troll / ~q.l. · uo!3o~u e p~puoo~s 3,0^ 43 !./~ JO^e) U I uo!3o,- e papuoo~s q:l I.~ ao^e:~ U I. -~ /Alsnou~.ueun se~ ~'~o^ t tea l I,O'd / aqJ. tp.!~ ~o^ej u! ~ /Atsnotu!ueun se,~ ~o^ tie' ttou / =NJ- ]OA ql!~ ~o^ej um /Atsnotu!ueun seth ;~:1o^ t te:~ troll / ~qJ- .uotlom e p:apuo:)~s q3!~ Jo^e} u! /Atsnotutueun se~ a:to^ tteo tto'~ / aqj. uo!:lotu e p~puoo;~s ~0~'~/"'~¢~5TMpue~p:a^otu ~ L~9~5~Z~- t~. -X"".t°ro' ~7//' c~o v'C'"'~' ql!~ ao^e:t u! i}~'~°' /Atsnotutueun se~ ~'zo~, tte:~ ilo'8 ! uqj. ~:l!m .~OAeJ U! ~ /XlSnOW!ueun se~ ~,o^ I, te~ tto~ / ~qJ- uo!3o~J ~ p~puoo~s /Atsnoa~!ueua se~4 ~:1o^ L te:~ t tOtl / aqt /Atsnotu[ueun se~ a:to^ t te~ [[o~ / aq.L uo!:Tom e papuooas pue pa^om "-""~~ ~ q:T?t -o^e:t uI ~ /Atsnom!ueun Sle~ ;a'~oa. ilea ttoa / aqJ. 165 August lO, 1982 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meetlng of the City Cbunc~l of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was held.at 5341Maywood Road in said City on August 10, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. Those present were: Mayor Rock Lindlan, Cou~cilmembers Pinky Charon, Robert Polston, Gordon Swenson. Councilmember Donald Ulrlck was late arriving. Also present were: City Attorney Curt..Pearson, City Manager Jon Elam, ~ity Engineer John Cameron, Finance Director Sharon Legg and City Clerk Fran Clark and the following interested persons: Wayne Skibicki, Kenneth Swanson, Donald Riis, Patzy D-Avlza, James Bradley, Stanley Lessln, Rodney Heln, Mark Annen, Walter Erickson, John Burger, Gary Paulson, Lynn Nichols, and Shelly Nett. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. MINUTES The Minutes of the August 3, 1982, Regular Meeting were pre~ented for consider- ation. Swenson moved and Charon seconded a motion to approve the Minutes of the August 3, 1982, Regular Meeting as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Mot'ion carried. PUBLIC HEARING A, EXTENSION OF STORM SEWER IN PEABODY ROAD The City Manager explained that this is an'additional small piece of storm sewer that was left out of the original County Road 110 Project. The owners of Lots 1 and 2, Block I, Sherwood Shores have peti'ti~n~d to have'the-existing, storm sewer extended because a great deal of erosion has taken place at the rear of their lots and the resulting sediment flowing into the channel is causing it to silt up. The Mayor asked the Engineer why. Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Sherwood Shores were not included in the assessment? The Engineer explained that they are not included in the drainage area becasue they don't contribute any water into the existing storm sewer. Their lots drain directly into the channel. The Mayor then opened the public hearing. Wayne Skibicki was present (owner of Lot 2) and asked several questions. He stated he was glad to see that something might be done to keep his lot from erbding away. Kenneth Swanson was present and asked why everyone in the County Road 1lO Project was paying for this?The Engineer explained that this should have been done by the County when the llO Project was done, but it was over- looked. He went on further to explain that so far the 110 Project is below estimate so adding this small extension of the storm sewer will have little affect on the total cost. The Mayor closed the public hearing. 166 August 10, 1982 Council'member Ulrlck moved and Charon seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82-219 REsoLuTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SOLICITATION OF QUOTATIONS ON THE EXTENSION OF STORM SEWER - PEABODY ROAD The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. B. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN EAGLE L~NE BETWEEN WOODLAND ROAD AND JENNINGS ROAD The City Manager explained that the owner of Lots 4, 5 and'~ of 3,.Block 10, Wood]and.Point has petitioned the. C~ty to get the water off these lots so he can mke it a buildable site. " The City Engineer' stated that Eagle Lane was improved in 1975. and on1¥ the'minimum storm sewers'were constructed~to save costs, s~nce on1¥ a few scattered streetswere included in the project.and it was not plos$[ble to provide areawide storm sewers.. He.went on to say the? they, the engineers, do not.feel that the. City of Mound should.bear the full cost of improving the drainage, through tb~s area. since"'th~s has. al~ays been a natural drainage way and the p~operty owners will receive ..substantial financial benefits by obtaining some bui~dable lots, Traditionally, this type of work.'is done by the property Owners them selves. The Mayor opened the public hearing, Six.property owners that ~ould be affected bY tbl's.'assessment voiced strong opposition to.the storm sewer improvement.because it would only benefit the owner of Lots 4, 5, and ½ of 3. The Mayor closed the public hear[ng~ Polston moved and Swenson sec0nded a mot[on not to proceed with this project unless the petitioner wants to pay for theentire project, The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried, COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT .. The Mayor asked if the public had any comments or suggestions. John Burger, candidate for the State Legislature District 43A introduced himself. ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 26.01 - MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE The City Manager explained that the Building Inspector has recommended that Section 26.0l (Minnesota Building Code, etc,) be amended with the updated codes because it hasn't been done since 1975, Ulrick moved and Polston seconded the following ordinance amendment: I ORDINANCE #43~ 167 August 10:198:2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 26.01 OF THE CITY CODE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE: PROVIDING FOR iTS ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT: REGULATING THE. ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL,.DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF MOUND: PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREFORL PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF: REPEALING SECTIONS 26.40 AND 26.63 OF THE CODE AND ALL OTHER ORDINANCES AND PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH. The vote was unanimously in favor~ Motion carried. PRESENTATION OF DESIGN PLAN FOR MOUND BAY PARK - LYNN NICHOLS & SHELLY NETT Lynn and Shelly explalned what they perceive as the parks shortcomings in relation to. the community needs. They are: 1. There will only be 7 trees left in the park after the diseased trees are removed. 2. Depot should be more of a focal point. 3. Beach is very small for the amount it is used. -4. Boat access is too close to the beach area. 5. Tot lot is too close to County Road liO. They then explained thAir design plan for the park. 1. Plantings in the parking area (islands).to soften the look of the asphalt, 2. Picnic areas defined by trees. ' 3. Renovation of the Depot - another deck on the lakeside and the other end .of the building. 4. Moving the beach area Closer to the Depot and away from the boat access.and enlarging the beach area. 5. Having one or two areas to moor'.boats: A. one near the boat access B. one on the other side of the beach area near the Depot 6. New play equipment on the tot lot and moving the tot lot closer to the beach area.and away from County Road 110. 7. One area left open and'dAfined'with?trees around it. The Council discussed various aspects of the design plan;: Preliminary costs were discussed. Polston moved and' Charon seconded a motion to accept the park plan general concept and to begin implementation and solicit quotations for the various items that can be done immediately. The vote was 4 in favor with Mayor Lindlan voting nay. The Mayor voted against because he felt the plan did not allow for immediate use of the park and because it did not include sun shelters. Motio~ carried. The Council complimented Lynn and Shelly on their design plan for Mound Bay Park. /f$2 168 August 10, 1982 PLANNING EXTENSION OF ONE YEAR - KEITH'KULLBURG The City Manager explained that the City has received a request from Keith Kullberg for an extension of Resolution #81-308 requiring removal of a .part .of their dwelling.' Ulr. ick moved and Charon seconded the following resolution RESOLUTION #82-220 RESOLUTION GRAN¥1NG AN EXTENSION OF 1 YEAR, UNTIL SEPTEMBER 22, 1983, FOR THE REMOVAL OF A PART OF THE DWELLING ON CITY PROPERTY (RESOLUTION #81-308) PID #13-117-24 11 0020 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT FIGURES - COUNTY ROAD 110 PROJECT JOhn Cameron, City Engineer, was present and gave the comparison of the proposed assessment figures and the Preliminary Engineering Report. Conc. Curb & Gutter Driveway Aprons Storm Sewer Prop. Assessment $3.,34/L.F. $1'.50/S.F. $ .046/S.F. P.E~R. Assessment $5.10/L.F. $3.58/S.F. $ .O48/S.Fo The Ci.ty's share of this project billed as of this date plus other costs are as follows: Invoiced from Hennepin County Eng. Legal, Fiscal & Admin. Misc. Expense (T.V. & repair. San. Sew., etc.) Direct Cost to Property'(Bus. drop & sewer & water service) Interest During Construction Total Cost of Project ' Amount Proposed to be Assessed Balance to be paid by City $156,592.49 11,123.OO 6,414.O9 21,478.27 20,689.68 $216,297.53 173,800.72 $ 42,496.81 Hennepin County has not finalized the cost of Right of Way acquisition, therefore, the City's' share is not included in the above figures. The county's estimate back in early 1981 was $178,000.00 of which the City's share would be 50~ or $89,000.00. This amount added to the $42,496.81 from above, would bring the total amount to be paid directly by the City to approximately ,$131,497.OO. There was discussion on how to pay the $131,497.O0, either by bonding or out of State Aid money. The Engineer asked the Council for an interest rate and length of ti'me of assessment and is hopeful that by August 24, 1982, the Council will be able to set a date for a public hearing on this assessment~ The ~nterest rate and length of time of the assessment can be changed but ts' needed for the Engineer to put something'in the computer and be able to come up an assessment role. August lO, 1~82 Swenson moved an~ Charon seconded a motion to set the interest rate'of.8.2~ for 15 years on the C0unt~'R0ad 110 Project (subject to change) so the City Engineer can compute an assessment role. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. COUNTY ROAD l l0 STREET LIGHTS - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT FIGURES The City Engineer reported that the total cos't of the project to date is $187,252.13, of which approximately $68,700.00 will be assessed back to the abutting properties. The bonding on this project was for $180,OOO.00. The Engineer needs an interest rate and length of time of the assessment, which can be changed, to be able to come up with an assessment role. Ulrick moved and Charon seconde a motion to set the interest rate of ll~ for 15 years on the County Road 110 Street Light Project (subject to change) so the City Engineer can comput~ an assessment role. The vote was 4 in favor with Councilmember Polston voting nay. Councilmember Polston voted nay because of his original premise on Resolution #81-244 that with the budget crunch and concerns of not being able to provide essential services. Motion carried. SIGN PERMIT - JOHN BURGER - 5307 SHORELINE BLVD. John' Burger, candidate for the State Legislative District 43A, was present' requesting approval of a temporary cloth banner 2½ feet by 20 feet for his campaign headquarters at 5307 Shoreline Blvd. The Planning Commission has recommended approval with the sign to be removed.by November 5, 1982. Charon moved and Swenson seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82-221 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVE THE TEMPORARY CLOTH BANNER SIGN 2½ FEET BY 20 FEET FOR 5307 SHORELINE BLVD. TO BE REMOVED BY NOVEMBER 5, 1982. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. KRAUSE REASSESSMENT The City Manager presented the resolution that has been prepared to carry out the terms in Resolution #82-218 reassessing Lots 9, 10,. & 11, Block 19, .Whipple Addition, for Council approval. Charon moved and Swenson seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION' #'82-222 RESOLUTION REASSESSING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON LOTS 9, 10 & 11, BLOCK 19, WHIPPLE ADDITION The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. PAYMENT OF BILLS Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion to approve the payment of bills as presented on the pre-list in the amount of $119,687.17, and a bill from the Mayor in the amount of $40.60, when funds are available. Roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 170 August 10,.1982',. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH REPORT - report On our municipal water supply. Total rating 91.5 which means.a high degree of safety. .- B. July 1982 - TW1N CITIES LABOR MARKET INFORMATION THE OUTFALL - A newsletter of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. D. LETTER FROM L.M.C.D. ATTORNEY - describing the policies and p. rocedures on prosecution of violations of the L.M,C,D, Code of Ordinances, E. CRIME RATE FOR 1981-82~FOR'MOUND - down 28.1~ Charon moved and Ulrick seconded a motion to adjourn at 10:60 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Jon Elam, City Manager Fran Clark, City Clerk SPEC IAL MEETING OF THE. CITY COUNCIL 171 August 17, 1982 P'ursuant to due call'and notice thereof, a special meeting of the City Council of the Ci'ty of Mound,'.Hennepin County, Mignesota, was held at 5341Maywood'Road in said City on August 17, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. Those. present'were: Mayor K0ck Lindlan, C0uncilmemb:rs ?inky Ghar0n, B0bcrt Polston, Gordon Swenson and Donald Ulrick. Also present were: City Manager Jon Elam, City Clerk Fran Clark, Cable T.V. Consultant Tom Creighton, Cable T.V. Committee Members: Marsha Smith, Bruce Wold, Harold Pellet, Dr. Ken Romness, Hel~ne Borg, Kent Borg and the following interested persons: James Kutzner, David Herzenach, Shirley Romness, Phyllis Jessen, Lee Jessen, James Bryant, Patzy D'Avia, Jerry Kohls, Wm. Barkly and Ron Gehring. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. ELECTION JUDGES The City Clerk presented th'e Council with a'list of persons recommended for appointment as election judges to serve at the Primary election September 14, 1982, and the General election on November 2, 1982. Swenson moved and Polston seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION #82=223 RESOLUTION'APPOINTING THE ELECTION JUDGES AS RECOMMENDED'FOR THE PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS SEPTEMBER 14, 1982 & NOVEMBER 2, 1982 The vote was unanimously in favor; Motion carried. .PUBLIC HEARING - CABLE T.V. REQUEST.FOR PROPOSALS (R.F.P.) The City Manager'introduced the.Cable T.V. Committee and their consultant, Tom Creighton. He explained that the Committee has tried to design a program for the community that will meet its' needs. The purpose of tonights public hearing is to get. input-from the citizens of Mound and adopt the Request for Proposals. Tom Creighton went o~er. the Request for Proposals, in great detail, for the Council and the citizens present. He then gave an explanation of how Cable T.V. works. The Mayor then opened'the Public hearing for citizen input or questions. Three persons asked questions about the cost of cable T.V. Tom explained that the cost would all depend upon the number of channels a resident wanted to have access to and what they wanted from those channels. The Council explained that the City is not going to try public ownership. The Mayor closed the public hearing. lqql 172 August 17, 1982 Polston moved and Ulrick seconded the following resolution. RESOLUTION 82-224 RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (R.F.P.) AS PRESENTED & AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SEEK BIDDERS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion c~rried. The Cbuncil thanked the Cable T.V. Committee and the Consultant for the fine work that has been done in preparing the R.F.Po Polston moved and Charon seconded a motion to adjourn at 9:10 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Jon Elam, City Manager Fran Clark, City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING '.The Clty Council of the Clty of Mound will conduct a Public Hearing on August 24, 1982, at 7:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers of City Hall at 5341Maywood Road, Mound, MN., to consider issuing a 3.2 Beer License to the Surfside, Inc., 2670 Commerce Blvd., Mound, MN. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the issuance of this license will be heard at this meeting. Francene C. Clark City Clerk Publish in The Laker August 9, 1982 1773 OFF SALE APPLICANT $20o.'oo $ 25.00 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE SELL NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR 1[~ME OF BUSINESS BUSIneSS ADDRESS APPLICAh"~' s HOME ADDRESS oF ] osnmss Applicant's ~a%e of Birth Citizen X/,~l .. ~.. References: (List three - name and address of each) sEcTION 32.03. ~'pplication for License. All applications for any license to sell non-intoxicating malt liquor shall bs made on forms to be suppl~ed by the City setting forth the nsme of the person asking for such license, his age, representations as to his chsr~'ct"-r %~th such references as may be required, his citizenshipr the location %.,'here such business is to b~ carried'on, whether such' application is for "on s~le" or "off sales", the business in' connection with ~ich the proposed license ~ill operate, Mhether spplicsnt is owner and op~.rator of s~ch. business, ~he time such appl..ie~nt has been in that business at that place, and such other inforw, ation as the governing body m~y requi~ from time to time. It shall 'be unla,fful 'to make a false statement - in an 8pp!icstion. RETAIL "0N SALE" OOUJ~T~ OF...~ff~.FZ. ff ............................. )t Cit~ OY M~und . To the .......... Q.~y...Q.o.~n~.il ..................... of the ...... ~it~. ......................... of ......... lb~d ................... ............................................................................................. State of ~ota: .............................. ~.~r.~.~.i~.~.,.....!n~.~..,.....~.~l....R ,..... ~.~.~ig,.....~.r~.~i~.~.n.~ .......................................................... : ................... ~r~ appl...a......for a ~ 1~ the ~ o/ ......... on~....~zear........:. ................................................................................................. from ~ ............... 1St .................................................... ~y of ........~.u~= .................................................................. ,15...~$.., ~o ~e~ At Reta~ 0nly, Non-~t0xicat~g Malt Liquor~, ~ ~ ~a~ ar~ ~fi~ ~ ~w, f~ ~p~ "0~" ~s~ ~i~ pr~ i~ ~ .................................................. ................................................ ~.i~3. ............................................................... of .......... ~:~o.~.n~ ........................................................................................ ~o~ ~ ~o~w~, ~' That part of subdivision 2 of lot 1, ~lat of sub- ~vts~ons two '"f2 Y ~""'~'&"'"'( 53'~'""~5~'-'~6'~'""('~3'-~'E""I'6 ~'"'I-,'"" ~ 6E'~T~'~-'~3"~ .... tox~ship 117 North, ~nge 26 west, etc. lack applicant further rtate, s that ~ ~ ~t ~ t~ ~l~r of, ~r h~ ~ ~e applieat~ for, ~r ~ h~ tnt~ to ~ app~t~ for a F~a~ Retai~ D~Fa 5~e~ ~ ~mp for t~ sale of i~x~tin~ l~r. The establishment previously had a liquor license which has not been renewed due to the inability to pay property taxes as required by state statute and city ordinance. ~e applicant intends to apply for the federal tax st~p when the liquor license is reisued. ~tate of. :fft{nn~ota, ~ Co~nt¥ of .............................................................................. ) Dt~tcx~ ~ .................................................................................... , ,'l/*/,n,n.., ................................................................................... , 1~ ............ ~tate of ~q~Iinne~ota, COU.,~T~ OF ...................................................................... I~ i.s hgrebll c~rt~l~ tha~ the ~ourn Board o[ t~ ~ of .............................................................................................. ~ sa.~ Cou~ ~ 8~, ~ r~o~ o~ ~ ............................................... ~ o~ .................................................................. 19 ............ did c~nt ~ ~ ~s~ o~ ~ ~ app~ ~or ~ t~ ~t~ ~~. Dated ........................................................................... 19 ............. ~ ~0~ BOARD OF THE ~OW~ O~ omn~nd~Hor~ o! t,h~ County .4ttorn~ll and the Account # )16 1582 91 )19 1579 91' 11 019 1723 31 11 022 1610'61 11 028 1688 91 11 O31 15~3 61 11 031 1701 41 11 O58 5000 02 11 058 5016 61 11 085 4960 91 11 O85 5084 71 11 088 2147 91 11 100 2085 41 11 109 5925 91 11 112 5917 O1 11 169 6048-31 69 6256 21 87 5447 71 11 187 5516 21 11 187 5570 91 11 193 2146 91 11 211 2142 81 11 220 2180 91 33 62O 472O 51 Delinquent Utility Bills Amount Russ Hartinaux $ 30.40 Robert Kelly ~6~68~ Bruce ~liem 1'91.51'~ ~ike Condon 78.14 Richard Juhl 119.42 Greg Hoseth 51.72 Clark & Keith 61.32 Orlando Alvarez 113.31 A. Anderson 55.44 Tom Harry 139.8o Scott Drews 13.20 David Heinsch 86.86 Gerald Baker 4~.39 Russell ~ Sloan 41.28 Thomas Jerde 42,38 Robert Krause 78.61 Sharry Johnson 125.94 Sue Palesotti 183.67 Roger Smith ~ Jeanette Belcourt 124.77 B B,iornstad 200[00 John floyer 5o.o1 Gerald Garvais 92.82 Gene Zentz ~ 261.47 $2635.59' $2335.76 I~o,~. 1582 Bluebird Ln. 'R~doced to $33,30 1723 Canary Ln. 1610 Dove Ln. 1688 Finch Ln, 1583 Bluebird Ln, 1701 Gull Ln. 5000 Enchanted Rd. 5016 Enchanted Rd, 4960 Three Pts, Blvd, 5084 Three Points Blvd, 2147 qrandview Blvd. 2085 Ironwood Rd, 5925 Hillcrest Rd, 5917 Gumwood Rd. 6048 Lynwood Blvd, Welfare will Day 5444 Tonkawood Rd. 5570Tonkawood Rd, 2146 Cedar Ln, 2142 Overland Rd, 2180 Cardinal Ln. 4720 Island View Dr, Account # 11 016 1582 91 11 019 1579 91 tt 019 1723 31 11 022 1610 61. 11 028 1688 91 11 031 1583 61 11 o31 17Ol '41 -il 058 5000 02 11 058 5016 61 11 085"4960 91 11 085 5084 71 11 088 2147 91 11 100 2085 41 11' 109 5925 91 11 112 5917 Ol 11 169 6o48-31 11 169 6256 21 11 187 5447 71 11 187 5516 21 11 187 5570 91 11 193 2146 91 11 211 2142 81 11 220 2180 91 33 620 4720 51 Delinquent Utility Bills Amount 30.40 256.68 191.5t 78.14 119.42 51.72 61,32 55.44 139.80 13.20 86.86 160.39 41.28 42.38 78.61 125.94 183.67 76.55 124.77 2oo oo 50.Ol 92.82 261.47 $2635.59 8-19-82 I??? CITY of MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 August 19, 1982 TO: FROM: RE: CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER ASSESSMENT HEARINGS I would like to suggest September 21, 1982, as the date for the County Road llO& Street Light Hearings. This is not a regularly scheduled meeting, but because of the nature of. these hearings, I would think a meeting that deals with these items woul'd be appropriate. If you agree, we need to schedule the meeting for 7:30 P.M. here in City Hall. JE:fc McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC, CONSULTING ENGINEERS II LAND SURVEYORS I~i PLANNERS August 10, 1982 Reply To: 12S00 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Mr. Jori Elam City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN 55364' Subject: County Road 110 Street Lights Preliminary Assessment Figures File #5951 Dear Jon: We have put together the total costs for the above project and also calculated some preliminary charges for assessment purposes. The assessment numbers stated in the Preliminary Engineering Report and those talked about at the public hearing were used as close as possible. The total footage to be as- sessed ended up to be less along with a different proportion between the footages of residential and other uses. The properties have been divided into two categories, single family resi- dential use as one and all other uses as the second category. The charge per foot for the other uses was computed at 1-1/2 times the residential rate. Us- ing this criteria, the amount to be assessed (568,700.00) was spread between the two uses as follows: Residential Use = 517,157.81 ~ 3,919.44 L.F. = ~4.38/L.F. Other Use 551,542:19 + 7,849.35 L.F. = ~6.57/L.F. The total cost of the project to date is ~187,252.13, of which approximate- ly 568,700.00 will be assessed back to the abutting properties. The following is a breakdown of the total cost of the street light project. Collins Electric' (City's contractor) Hennepin County (McCrossan & Egan McKay) Interest expense Engineering, Administrative, Legal and Fiscal Total Cost of Projec't Proposed Assessment Amount Balance to be Paid by City 62,254.40 92,150.73 20,475.00 12,372.00 '5187,252.13 68~700.00 5i18,552.13 printed on recycled paper /??? Hr. Jon Elam August 10, 1982 Page Two We are aware that even though the total amount to be assessed is unchanged, the charge for the street lights is approximately ~1.25 per foot above the figures stated at the public hearing, but we feel that this is the only economical way for the City to finance a portion of this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Cameron 0RC/jb /?5-0 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAY'WOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 Date: Aug. 16, 1982 To:. Jon Elam From: Sharon Legg Attached are statements as of June 30, 1982 for County Road 110. As you can see, we have $209,097.53 of expenses at this point. John Ca~eron has estimated an additional $7200.00 to cover any remaining costs, exclusive of easements which he is estimating to be approximately $75.000.00~ There- fore, the total project cost is $291,297.53 of which $173.800.72 is to be assessed. The balance is to be born by the City. Also, please note that we have a cash deficit of'$178.269.92o This will be increased by the cost of the easements ~nd the additional $ 7200.00 , bringing the cash defict to $260,469.92. "Thus the reason we need to sell bonds. I propose that we sell $260,000 of Temporary Bonds to the Debt Service Fund of th City to mature on 9-1-84 at a rate of 10.50%. My feeling here is that we probably could not sell them for less on the market and I am not getting much more than 11% on my investing, Therefore. the City is not losing ( if rates remain as they are anyhow) and we would save issuance costs. On September 1, 1984, the Temporary Street Light Bonds mature. We could then combine the issues or if interest rate are favorable before then, refinance the County Road 110 Bonds earlier. This still leaves us with one problem, the City is to fund the unassessed b&lance. Therefore, I think we should set up a two year tax levy along with the Temporary BOnd issue. In 1984, we can take a second look to reevaluate our needs at that time. If we are changing the interest rate on assessments set at the previous council meeting, .I would recommend setting it at 11% . This seems high but if we are selling bonds at 10.50%, it would cover the interest expense. It would also be consistent with the rate charged on the Street Light assessment, 'CITY OF HOUND, HINNESOTA 1981 County Road 110 Project as of June 30, 1982 Cash AssETs (178,269.92), LIABILITIES & FUND BALANCE Liabilities Accounts Payable .McCombs Hennepin C'ounty McCrossan Interest payable thru 9-30-82 Fund Deficit T°ta] ~iabilitie~ and fund deficit $ 86.00 8,207.60 1,844.33 20,689.68 $" 30,827.61 $ (209 ,'097.53) -$' ..(178,269.92) Summa'ry 'of Expenses Engineering Legal . . Hennepin County Contract. McCrossan (diKect, ly assessable.) Widmer (4,822.36 is directly assessable) Viking Fence Hydrant Egan McKay Misc. I n te res t 'Expense $ 2,738.00 1,185.00 156,592.49 16,655.91 '8,158.31 2,067.30 608.00 227~43 175.41 0,689.68 $ .... 209,097.53 RESOLUTION NO. 82- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY AND THE CITY MANAGER TO BEGIN TO NEGOTIATE THE SALE OF BONDS FOR COUNTY ROAD 110 STREET IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, WHEREAS, bonds need to be sold to finance the costs of street improve- ment on County Road 110, and the cost of the street improvement is estimated'to be $305,780.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the City Attorney and the City Manager be authorized to begin to negotiate the sale of bonds for street improvements on County Road 110. McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, I.NC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS · LAND SURVEYORS [] PLANNERS August 23, 1982 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Mr. J0n Elam City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Subject: Mound, Minnesota Peabody Road Storm Sewer Extension File #6510 Dear jon: Enclosed are two copies of the plans for the above project. We have also received two bids for the proposed work, of which both were below our original estimate of $10,515.00. The following are the two'bids. Widmer Bros., Inc., Spring Park F.F. Jedlicki, Eden Prairie $9,335.00 $9,865.00 We would.reoommend the City accept the low bid of $9,335.00 from Widmer Bros. and enter into a contract for this project. If you need any additional information, please contact me. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Jo~~hn Cameron' JC:sj Enclosure Minneapolis- Hutchinson - Alexandria- Eagan printed on recycled paper PROPOSAL Ite~ Mound, Minnesota Peabody Road Storm ~,ewer. File ~6510 'Storm Sever Manhole Catch Basin ManhOle'.With 3' Sump 'Reloda[e Existing 2i" Concrete Apron quantit~ 287 L~F. 1 EAC~ 1 EACH Unit Price LUMP SUM Total 'Granular Material iozAL (Indivldual; Partnership; Corporation) PROPOSAL Mound, Minnesota Peabody Road Storm Sewer File ~6510 Item. 2i"' RCP Storm Sewer ~anhole Catch Basin Manhole With 3' Sump Relocate'Exlsting 21" Concrete Apron Rip Rap Tree Removal Quantity Unit Price Total 287 L.F. I EACH 1 EACH C.Y. EACH 4" Black Dirt & Seed 340 S.Y. Granula'r Material 30 TON (Individual; Partnership; Corporation) Pho.e: ~.. ?,'-/- Z-2 7 P- McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ~ LAND SURVEYORS PLANNERS August 24., 1~82 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) BB§-3700 Mr. Jon Elam City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Subject: Mound, Minnesota 1982 Street Overlay Project Change Order No. 2 File #6468 Dear Jon: Enclosed are three copies of change order no. 2 in the amount of $9251.00 for the bituminous work around the City garage and also paving the driveway to the well house off Three Roints Boulevard. These prices are consistent with the other unit prices on the original contract. We would recommend the City approve this change order to the con- tract with Aero Asphalt. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. JC:sj Enclosure printed on recycled paper CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 Mound, Minnesota 1982 Street Overlay Project File #6468 PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE - PARKING LOT ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL Patch- (Mn/DOT 2331) 2" Overlay (Mn/DOT 2341) 4" Wear Course (Mn/DOT 2341) 3" Wear Course (Mn/DOT 2341 Driveway to Well House 29 Tons 100 Tons 187 Tons 60 Tons $27.00/TN $ 783.00 $23.00/TN $ 2,300.00 $24.00/TN $ 4,488.00 $28.00/TN $. 1,680.00 Total, Change Order No. 2 $ 9,251.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $25,885.50 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 $ 4,691.00 $ 9~251.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $39,827.50 APPROVED: !70 ASPHALT INC. Date: APP~VED: CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA y Manager Date: CITY of MOUND August 19, 1982 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MQUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER As a part of the effort to clean-up around City Buildings, I've developed quotations for hard surfacing the driveway to Well #'s 4 & 7 on Three Points Blvd. ($1,500..) and around the City Shop ($7,900.). This will in both cases solve a major soil erosion problem, allow for better parking for the City and generally clean-up areas that have been a real mess. The cost is under $10,000 and we would solicit quotations for the work, although it may make sense to tie into Aero Asphalt's work that they are doing presently in town. This would be paid for out of Revenue Sharing Funds for 1982. I will reduce the amount allocated for Building Remodeling from $20,000 to $10,000. JE:fc / 73-3- ARLYS GRIBOVSKY 7091 TECUMSEH LANE · CHANHASSEN. MINNESOTA 55317 ~'member Polston moved the following resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 81-269 August 11, 1981 WHEREAS, RESOLUTION CONCURRING WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVING THE VARIANCE AS PREVIOUSLY GRANTED - LOT 7, BLOCK 1, HALSTEAD ACRES 2ND ADDITION the owner of property described as Lot 7, Block l, Halstead Acres 2nd Addition, PID #23-117-24 33 OO18~dlake front variance to allow the building of an earth bermed home, and WHEREAS, the owners were granted this variance by Resolution #80-310 and due to tight money the variance was not used within ~he one year time period and is now null and void, and WHEREAS, the owner wishes to begin construction and requests the variance be renewed, and ~ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the variance previously granted, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the Council concurs with the Planning Commission's recommendation approving the variance as previously granted - Resolution 80-310. A motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Swenson and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Charon, Polston, Swenson, Ulrick and Lindlan; the following voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the C}ty Manager. : Ci Manager st ty s/Leighton Lindlan Mayor CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Jon Elam, City Manager Licensing Department ll August 1982 License Application - Game of Skill The Twin City Novelty Company.has made application for a Game of Skill license for a Video Game-Stratovox for the .Mound V. F. W. Post 5113. License., if granted by the Council, would expire April 30, 1983. Marge Stutsman August 18, 1982 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE CARS Enclosed is a report from Bruce Wold, who has been involved in checking out administrative autos. Three cars were initially approved in the 1982 Budget out of the Equipment Outlay Fund for a total of $21,000. Bruce has found that by purchasing good quality rental cars, we can save about $1,500 - $2,000 per car and be pretty well set with administrative cars for the next 2-3 years. The recommendation is to purchase 1982 Chevrolet Cavaliers from National Car Rental. The cost will be $6,000 and they will come very comfortably equipped, i.e. automatic transmissions, air conditioning, AM radios and comfortable upholstery, etc. By purchasing this form of car, it should insure that they will have good resale value later. The cars would be used as follows: 1. Building Inspector car - replacing the 1979 Chevrolet that gets 7 miles per gallon - Cavalier gets 26 miles per gallon and is smaller. We would trade off the old Chevrolet for an estimated $2,500-$3,000, thus reducing the net cost to $3,000. Replace Police Chief's car - The present car would be put back into the police car pool thus putting it to the use it was originally intended. In Bruce's case, for the most part, he needs solid transportation and not a police car and the Cavalier would provide that. On this car we can then trade off the oldest police vehicle for an estimated $2,000 - reducing net cost to $4,000. An office pool car for the City Manager, Finance Director, etc. Every week someone has a meeting or a conference somewhere in the metro area. This car can be used for these trips. It will be stored with the police cars and be under the supervision of the City Manager. I hope this plan looks O.K. It sure seem economical and reasonable to me. JE:fc enc. / INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Jon Elam Bruce Wold Purchase of Ac~ministrative Autos DATE August 10 Dick Schnable and I spent about five hours investigating various used car dealers from which we could purchase three admisistrative autos. The companies we visited were Avis, Hertz, National Car Rental and Carlson Leasing. Ail of the companies had cars that would easily fit our needs. The following autOs were looked at: 1) Avis Car Rental - International Airport COST a. 1981 Chevrolet Citation. '$5700 b. 1982 Chevrolet Cavalier .6500 These cars would be equipped with automatic or standard transmissions, air conditioning and AM radio. The miles on the cars would very from 27,000 to 31,000. Warranty is 12months or 12,000 miles with service at international airport. 2) Hertz Car Rental - International Airport All Hertz cars had in excess of 35,000'miles on the'odometers and weren't considered suitable for our use because of the high mileage. In addition the cars appeared to be in generally poorer conditiOn than the other cars we looked at. 3) National Car Rental - International Airport 'a. 1982 Plymouth Horizon $5800 ~.b. 1982'Chevrolet caValier. 6000 ~~e e-qu~pped~ automatic or st-~ transmissions, airconditioning and AM radio. /~le mileage on these cars would be in the area of 20,000. Warranty is 24 months or 24,000 miles with service available at any local dealer. Dick felt that we should stay away from the Horizon because of the aluminum engine block. He felt that the engine block could'present problems in the future. 4) Carlson Leasing - Eden Prairie a. 1982 Chevrolet Cavalier $6700 b. 1981 Dodge Omni 5600 c. 1981 Chrysler K Cars 6200 These cars would be equipped with Automatic or Standard transmissions, airconditioning and AM radio. The mileage on these cars would be between 7,000 to 15,000 miles. 'rhe only warranty offered on the cars would be the balance of the new car warranty. Dick and I had the opprotunity to test drive and evaluate all the 'cars that we saw. Dick and I both feel that the best buy is the 1982 Chevrolet Cavalier from National Car Rental with the 24 month or 24,000' mile warranty. I am including a brochure on this car to further fam- iliarize you with the car. The Cavalier is .a new production car for Chevrolet in 1982. It is built to compete with the Japanese models that are heavily equipped when they reach the showroom floor. The Cavalier is produced at a new GM plant with improved quality control by using robots in its assembly. If you apporve National will gather some cars for Dick and I to evaluate. · This would include going over the cars, test driving and checking the service records. I,? I Welcome to a new era in automo- tive design and function. Welcome to the '1982 Chew Cavalier. The most complete new car we've ever introduced. What do we mean by "complete"? Read on. Complete In standard features. No other new car ever introduced by Chewolet has been so well equipPed as the t982 Cavalier. A listing of some of those stan- dard features can be found on pages 4-5. It's impressive reading. Complete In technology. Virtually designed by the wind, that sleek shape you see is the product of extensive wind tunnel wo~ under gale-force conditions. In fact, a Iow drag coefficient (only 0.40 with the Hatchback Coupe] is a major CAVALIER. THE MOST COMPLETE factor in Cavalier's ability to cruise at 50 MPH with less horsepower than most other production cars on the road. And. while you're driving, your engine's functions are monitored constantly by a sophisticated on- board computer that fine tunes the peflormance. A good example of GM 'U" car technology at work. If the going gets tough, front- wheel drive helps provide the traction you need for snaw, mud or wet streets. More than 60% of the weight is over the driving wheels. Your ride is smooth and respon- sive. Front suspension features MacPherson struts, and coil springs are in back. The steering is high-. mounted rack-and-pinion. And the body rests on a ~01" wheelbase which pays off in a remarkable amount of roam in the passenger comportment and cargo area. Cavalier has been tested and retested. It's the most thoroughly tested new car in our history. Complete in comfort. Front-wheel drive with a transverse- mounted engine and transaxle means stretch-out space inside. Cavalier has exterior dimensions similar to many well-known imports. Yet inside, you'll find more pas- senger room and more cargo room than Honda Accord, Datsun 2t0 or Toyota Corolla. Cavalier is squarely positioned in size between Chew Chevefte and Citation. Yet, except for shoulder room and hip room, Cavalier has virtually the same roomy interior as the larger Citation. And. Cavalier has more head room. You'll also be impressed by the steps we have taken to engineer noise out of the Cavalier Wffve used acoustical materials that are Iow in weight and high in effectiveness. Comfort is also things like fully reclining front seats. Armrests with integral door pull handles. An assist grip above each passenger door. And a convenient center console. Complete In efficiency. Here is the kind of efficiency today's driving realities demand. With the standard '1.8 Liter 4-cylinder engine and 4-speed manual overdrive transmission, Cavalier has an im- pressive [] EPA estimated MPG and a hig~h-way estimate of 42: There's even a Maximum Efficiency [ME] Coupe available with [30~ EPA estimated MPG, 47 highwa~-'sti- mate.* It includes a 4-speed manual overdrive transmission and is not available with air conditioning or power steering. The ME Coupe is not available in California. ,NEW CAR WE'VE EVER INTRODUCED. Complete in quality. Take a good look at a t982 Cavolie[ Notice the tight fit around the hood, doors and deck lid. The brazed sheet metal seams that blend into the solid unibody. The smooth, durable, high-luster acrylic finish. And the aflention to detail-- such as window moldings bevelled like a fine picture frame. But Cavalier's quality runs deeper. "There are two ways to ensure a consistently high-quality car," says Roger Masch. Chevrolet Chief Engineer for Cavalier. "The first is in a design that can be built to con- sistent specifications, and the second in manufacturing technol- ogy that can hold within the specifications. On both sides, we have accomplished remarkable successes'.' Gerald W. Ropers, Project Manager at Fisher Body is o leader in this new approach to design. "Consistency is the key," Ropers soys. "You design all components so there is only one way they can be put together--the right way "For example, door and fender mountings traditionally are designed to 'float' in oversized holes so that the assembler con make adjustments to compensate for variations in fit. On the Cavalie[ there are no adjustments. The holes are exactly the same size as the bolts...and the end result is a true- tiffing door and fender every time:' An entire regiment of new auto- matic controls was needed to keep the rigid standards. Such dramatic devices as gamma-ray inspection to test pads hidden from view are used for the first time. Ultrasonic weld testers to measure the strength of a weld with echo readings. And there are robot-manipulated optic probes-devices that actually see to check the precision of joints and of body openings. Our quality commitment extends to over t,000 checks like these. Complete In choice. Cavalier's model lineup is com- plete, varied and exciting. Elegant Sedan. classy Coupe. slick Hatch- back Coupe and spacious Wagon. Four models available in two series: Cavalier and Cavalier CL. Each with the latest kind of think- ing, state-of-the-ad technology, design integrity and atlention to detail you'd expect from the world's largest automotive manufacturer. Chew Cavalier. Complete in even/way A WORD ABOUT THIS CATALOG: We have tried to make this catalog as comprehensive and factual as possible and we hope you find it helpful. However, since the time of printing, some of the information yoV will find here may have been updated. Also, some of the equipment shown or descri/~ec/throughout this catalog is available at extra cost. Your dealer has details and, before ordering, you should ask him to bring you Up to date. The right is reserved to make changes at aoy time, without notice, in prices, colors, materials, equipment, specifications and models. Check with your Chevrolet dealer for complete information. 'Use the estimotecl MPG for comparisons. Your mileage may differ depending on speed, distance, weather. Actual highway mileage lower. _J CAVALIER COMES COMPLETE WITH 4.3 STANDARD FEATURES. Cavalier comes with the kind of comfort, convenience and engi- neering features that make it a pteasure to own and drive. When you check over this list-- or the sticker price-please note the '1982 Cavalier standard features that on many cars you'd have to pay extra for. Inch for inch and pound for pound, Cavalier is a whore new way of looking at Chew value. q. Front-wheel drive. 2. 1.8 Uter 4-cylinder transverse engine. 3. 4-speed manual overdrive ffansmission. 4. Power-assisted front disc/rear d~Jm brakes. 5. Glass-belted radial tires. 6. Computer Command Control. 7. Quick rack-and-pinion steering. 8. MacPherson-strut front suspension.. 9. Push-button AM radioWith ,dual front Speakers.* 10. Quartz digital clock (integral with radio). 11. Front stabilizer bar. 12. Freedom II maintenance-free batte~/. 13. Large-capacity fuel tank. 14. Day/night inside rearview mirror. 15. Side window defoggers. 16. Electric rear window defogger. 1Z Id-color, segmented tail lamps with amber turn signals (except Wagon). 18. Flow-thru power ventilation system. 19. Locking gas filler door with cap holder. 20. Substantial acoustical insulation. 21. Accessible in-dash flip-down fuse panel. 22. Remote ttunk/hatchback/ tailgate release. 23. Body side moldings. 24. Styled steel Rally wheels. 25. Bumper nab strips. 26. Reclining contoured front seats. 27. Assist grid above each passenger door. 28. Con~;ole with rear ashtray and coin holder. 29. Plastisol~ lower body stone- chip protection. 30. Color-keyed seat and shoulder belts. 3'/. Color-keyed carpeting. 32. Extended front seat track. 33. Column-mounted "Smart Switch? 34. Cigarette lighter and ashtray lamp. 35. Glove compartment lock. 36. Styled outside rearvlew mirror. 37. 31 separate anti-corrosion- treatment areas. 38. Resettabte trip odometer. 39. Passenger-guard door locks. 40. Side-lift jack. 4'/. Double-panel construction in doors, hood and trunk lid. 42. Strong, lightweight steel bumpers [except Hatchback]. 43. Audible disc brake wear sensors. And "plus" Items are on individual body styles: like a carpeted cargo floor in the Hatchback and Wagon. Or a tailored protective trunk mat in the Coupe and Sedan. See page 22 for details. There are even more good things to enjoy with the ~982 Chevrolet Cavalier CL AND YOU GET 15 MORE STANDARD FEATURES WITH THE CAVALIER CL. I. Power steering. 2. Rear stabilizer bar. 3. Intermittent windshield wiper system. 4. Sport mirrors, left-hand remote control and fight-hand manual. 5. Tinted glass. 6. Halogen headlamps. Z CL exlerior appearance group. 8. Styled Si)od wheel covers. 9. Custom intefi~ 10. Passenger visor vanity mirror. 11. Leather-wrapped steering wheel. '/2. Auxiliary lighting group. 13. AM/FM radio with dual front speakers.* '/4. Gage package. "/5. Glass-belled radialwhite-sfripe tires {blackwalls on Hatchback). In addition, Cavalier CL Wagon and Hatchback models have a rear window wiper/washer standard. Also, a tachometer is standard on the Hatchback. For additional Cavalier/Cavalier CL features, see charl on page 22. "May be deleted for credit. I? g CITY of MOUND August 18, 1982 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER Jerry Rockvam seems to be proceeding with his plans to build a boat storage building behind the National Food Store on Eden Road. Since warehouse type facilities are not premitted under the Zoning Code, a Conditional Use Permit will be required. Mr. Rockvam is submitting his plan for the site to the Planning Commission for consideration at their meeting on August 30, 1982. Because of the lag time between the Council Meetings and the need to publish the required notices:, he is requesting that we set a hearing date for September 14, 1982, for his Conditional Use Permit. The only problem I have with this, is the potential precedent we are setting by scheduling the Council hearing prior to the time it even goes before the Planning Commission. Other than that I don't see any problems. JE:fc 7 CITY of MOUND August 16, 1982 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO'. CITY COUNC IL FROM: CITY MANAGER It has been suggested that the Sign Ordinance Section 55.38, be amended to allow for administrative approval, by the City Manager, for temporary signs. This would allow fOr the issuance of approval of these types of signs either at the site of the sign or at the counter. Some rules governing the issuance of Temporary Sign Permits might include: they will not be up more than 2 months; they conform to the existing sign ordinance in terms of set-backs, sign size, etc. It does seem that it might simplify the process and release the Council from having to review every "Babe Ruth Tournament" type sign, etc., which seem are always approved anyway. JE:fc INTEROFFICE MEMO Ma na ge r ~/~ FROM: Park Director SUBJECT: Three Points Tennis Court DATE Attached is a quote from ~ennis west inc. for repairs and resurfacing of the Three Points court. I have contacted several other companies in an effort to obtain a second price, but it aopears that they do not care to quote on the job. Is it possible to accept the price from Tennis West and proceed with the work this fall? If you remember this is the company which installed the court at Island Park Playground and an excellent job. COURT DESIGN &. CONSTRUCTION · MAINTENANCE .ACCESSORIES 6105 Baker Road Minnetonka, Mn. 55343 (612) 933-8272 PHONE: Proposal Submitted To Name _C_i_t .Y.; _°-f--M. _°~u n d Street 5341 Ma~wood Rd. c~t--M~'d- S t a~; -~ n~- ·., -5.S-3-6-~ ...... Telep~'o-~e'~J~'l~-er. Cl~m--'-~-B-611i s 472-1155 I Pr"oposal iNNI$ W $T LTD. iLEY BROS. ENTERPRISES 6105 BAKER ROAD NNETONKA, MN 55343 ~1,2) 933-8272 Work To Be Performed At Proposal No.TC-82-056 ! Sheet No. 1 of 1 J Date June 1, 1982 Street Wren Rd. Three Points Blvd. Park city Mound State_M~.~, Date of Plans_~..~V~a 1982 Architect We hereby propose to furnish all the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the completion of the repair and resurfacing of an existing doubles tennis court at l~'he ab'ore hated.lo'cation.'": Work to comply with the follwoing: ~ contractor tO remove existing f6nce and tennis net posts. (Z)--ASpha'tt mat to be extend~ 12--ft. to West. Min. 3nr-~-D-O-T 2331 '~-l'&-ck base" shall be instal'l'~d. (:3) En-i;ire court surface shall be tacked and ov6r'layed ~'ith a 231~1 wearing course. (-4-)---l~e-h-nis net posts~o be instal led with center tie anchor. [ '(-D)mAqq new galvanized c~ain link' tennis court fencing 1-0¥t. high sh'aI! be 1 lll-s-t~-ll~d 6" in from edg~' Of new asphalt mat': "Fence to be 2-"--gg-~-T--. f~b-fic-~ W]~tll--3~-terminal posts, 2~" l~ne pos'ts,"'1 5/~" top ra~l, H. & U. bracir e--aq-l--l~ernti-n~-pos~s, ~ ga. boLgui, i. cn~ ;un wi-r~'d-h~LTty-h-~d~/a'ru.' C-F>}A-De~e~-a-l-t--D/-S--l~>-Ge-!~>~--Dys-tem-~>~--new asphalt s~a-l-1--be-+ns-t-a-l-l-ed. .... ~olor~ t, cL.b~._2L~__green w~th 2" white .nlay~n (7) Ad~oinin§ multi-use hardcourt surface shall be surfaced with Decoralt and two basketball free throw lanes shall be striped. All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work t.[~.be performed in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for above work and completed in a"substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of Dollars ($ 9,940.00 I. with payments to be made as follows: Net up__on_ compl etlon Any alteration or deviation from above specifications Involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate, All agreements, contingent upo~ strikes, accidents or delays beyond our carry fire, tornado and other rtecessary, Insurance upon above work. ~Wo[kmen's Compensation Public control.Liability Insurance Owner to on above work to be taken out by .Fi~].e~~er~T.__ and 177o ' 9 (' ,n BILLS ..... AUGUST 24, 1982 Allied Blacktop' Co. Diane Arneso.n Autocon Industries Air Comm Acro-M i nnesota Earl F Andersen & Assoc F.H. Bathke Blackowiak & Son Chapin Publishing A.B. Cumming Nancy Clough DLrector Property Tax Delano Fire Dept Dept of Property Tax Jon Elam ~ Floralview F i rehouse First Bank Mpls Gerry's Plumbing Greyhound Travel Club Hennepin COunty Hawkins Chemical Henn Coop Seed Exchange Illies& Sons Robert Johnson O.J. Janski & Assoc Koehnen's Standard LOG I S IJawton Printing Mankato Conference McCombs Knut son Mi nn Comm Metro Fone Metr6 Waste Control MCFOA MacQueen Equip M i nnega sco N.W. Bell Tele No Central AWWA Navarre Ndwe N.S.P. Old Dominion Brush Pitney Bowes Reo Raj Kennels Sterne Electric Jack Strohm ' State Treas. Satellite Industries Thrifty Snyder Drug T & T Maintenance 32,918.42 17O. OO 154.60 90.o0 218.67 175.67 20.70 56.OO 182.40. 20. oq 48.15 319.57 3oo~.oo 29:00 35;.70 13.5b 14.97 20.00 57.OO 5o.oo 33,032.00 171.74 49.50 260.00 29.04 85O. OO 152.34 1,291.12 14.85 15o.00 5,774.50 28.50 11.8o 19,277.27 15.OO 338.44 45.31 72.80 130.O0 296.93 4,o41.o3 648.OO 55.5o 220.00 17.90 5O.OO 15.00 390.00 30.98 73.75 Thurk Bros. Chev Timberwall Landscaping Unitog Rental Serv Wurst,Carrol 1 ,Pearson John We|dt Assoc Water Products WidmeF Bros Xerox R~L. Youngdahl Brown Photo Tonka Printing Griggs, Cooper Johnson Bros. Liquor MN Dis,tillers Old Peoria Ed Phillips Holly Bostrom Babler Automotive Total Bills 600.57 14.40 240.30 14,361.34 '225.00 262.43 407.00 82.72 5,27o.00 139.50 385.00 3,173.64 4,951.94 1,132.90 2,156.97 3,452.94 144.OO 1,849.26 141,277.56 August 18, 1982 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: C I TY MANAG ER Enclosed is a llst of public facilities I want to include in the Cable T.V. R.F.P. (Request for Proposals). Please let me know if you know of any additions to the list. 1. Westonka Community Services Building 2. Our Lady of the Lake School 3. Mound C|ty Hall 4. Shirley Hills Elementary School 5. Hilltop Elementary School (Minnetrsita) 6. Mound-Westonka High School (Minnetrista) 7. Senior Citizen Housing Project (2020 Commerce Blvd.) 8. Island Park Community Hall JE:fc APL EIW/O 1380 FROST AVENUE MAPLE\VOOD. MINNESOTA 55109 OFFICE OF MAYOR 779-4524 ^ugust 9, 1982 To the Mayor, Councilmembers, All Other City Officials, and Their-Spouses: I wish to extend to you a cordial invitation to attend the Regional Meeting of the League of Minnesota Cities in conjunction with the Association of Metropol- itan Municipalities to be held at the Holiday Inn-in Maplewood on September 16, 1982. The Holiday Inn is located behind the Maplewood Mall at 1-694 and White Bear Avenue. Beginning at 2:30 p.m., there will be a Roundtable Discussion for all Local Government Officials. The program will include a presentation on and demon- stration of the Small City (microcomputer) Management Information Systems (utility billing, budqet/accounting), by Tom Thelen of the League staff and Roger Sell, Executive Director of the Intergovernmental Information Services Advisory Council. The supper will begin at 6:30 p.m. and tickets are $9.00 including gratuity. A social hour with a cash bar will precede the supper at 5:30. I am enclosing a postcard for reservations to be returned by September 9, 1982. You will note that if you make reservations for more persons than actually attend, you may be billed for those who do not come unless I am notified three days before the meeting of any changes. After supper there.will be a panel discussion by League staff and board members of questions of concern to attendin~ cities. A brief status report on the League building will be given. Legislators and candidates have been invited to attend as well as representatives from those state aaencies who come into frequent contact with cities. Adjournment will be no later than 9:30 p.m. Enclosures - 2 AGENDA LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES AND ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES MAPLEWOOD, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 16, 1982 Afternoon Program Thomas Thelen, Field Representative, presiding. 2:30 - 3:30: Crime & Law Enforcement in Metro Area 3:30 - 5:30: (With coffee break) Presentation on and demonstration of the Small City (microcomputer) Management Information System (for utility billing, budget/accounting). Evenin9 Program 5:30 - 6:30: Social Hour - Cash Bar 6:30 - 7:30: Dinner 7:30 - 9:30: Evening Meeting a) League building completion report. b) Update on the city-state financial relationship. c) Explanation of the League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Action Program, including the policy development process and legislative district activities. d) Answers to questions'about local problems of general interest by a League attorney and other League staff. 9:30: Adjournment NOTE: Copies of the most frequently requested League publications will be available. Hennepin County Park Reserve District 3800 County Road 24 · Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 · Telephone 612-473-4693 PARK RESERVES BAKER CARVER CROW-HASSAN ', ELM CREEK HYLAND LAKE LAKE REBECCA · MURPHY-HANREHAN' REGIONAL PARKS CLEARY LAKE' COON RAPID,S DAM EAGLE LAKE FISH LAKE JAMES W. WlLKIE' MEDICINE LAKE SPRING LAKE' SPECIAL USE AREAS BAKER PARK GOLF COURSE CLEARY LAKE GOLF COURSE' HYLAND HILLS SKI AREA NOERENBERG MEMORIAL TRAIL CORRIDORS H HENNEPIN TRAIL ER PARKS WAWATASSO ISLAND WILD GOOSE CHASE ISLAND 'SCOTI'4-1ENNEPIN PARK AUTHORfTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WILLIAM BARBEAU CHAIR MINNEAPOLIS WILLIAM E. GENTRY . VICE CHAIR NEW HOPE JUDITH S. ANDERSON BLOOMINGTON SHIRLEY A. BONINE MAPLE PLAIN PHYLLIS CRIMMINS MINNEAPOLIS AMELIA M. DeMusE MINNEAPOLIS CHARLES R. PIHL ORONO MALCOLM D. REID SHOREWOOD DONALD C. RINGHAM MINNEAPOLIS RAYMOND N, SEAGREN MINNEAPOLIS -MARIE SOLENS}~' N?.TL'S CLIFTON E. FRENCH SUPERINTENDENT & SECRETARY TO THE BOARD August 6, 1982 Mayor Rock Lindlan 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN. 55364 Dear Mayor Lindlan: The Park Reserve District Board of Commissioners is reviewing and updating its policies for development and operation of the Hennepin County Park Reserve District. The Board seeks your comment and suggestions on these policies during this. public review process. For comparative purposes, we have enclosed a copy of the prOposed new policy draft, along with the policy statement now in force. Your response may be made at one of the public hearings that are scheduled for this purpose, or you may present your comments in writing at any time up to September 10, 1982. The public hearing schedule is attached. We recognize some editing needs to be done, so we ask that. your attention and comment be directed primarily at ~licy concepts. The Park Reserve District began in 1957. The Board adopted its original Policy Statement in 1967. These policies were intended to interpret the enabling legislation under which the District was created and to pilot the implementation of that law to accomplish the.purposes of the District. These policies have served the District well; however, it is time for an overall review and update that takes into account changeS'in the social and economic climate in which the District exists and changing patterns of leisure. The revised Policy Statement is aimed at providing sound direction for the continuing growth and oPeration of what has become recognized as an outstanding county park syst.em. If you have any questions with regard to these policies or to their interpretation, please feel free to call me at 645-0853 or Superintendent Clifton E. French at 473-4693. Thank you for your consideration. Ch air Hennepin County Park Reserve District 3800 County Road 24 · Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 · Telephone 612-473-4693 PARK RESERVES BAKER CARVER CROW-HASSAN · ELM CREEK HYLAND LAKE LAKE REBECCA · MURPHY-HANREHAN' REGIONAL PARKS CLEARY LAKE' COON RAPIDS DAI;I EAGLE LAKE' FISH LAKE JAMES W. WlLKIE° MEDICINE LAKE SPRING LAKE' SPECIAL USE AREAS BAKER PARK GOLF COURSE * CLEARY LAKE GOLF COURSE' HYLAND HILLS SKI AREA NOERENBERG MEMORIAL TRAIL CORRIDORS NORTH HENNEPIN TRAIL OTHER PARKS WAWATASSO ISLAND WILD GOOSE CHASE ISLAND '~CO~'T-H~,,NN~PIN PARK AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS WILLIAM BARBEAU CHAIR MINNEAPOLIS WILLIAM E, GENTRY VICE CHAIR NEW HOPE JUDITH S. ANDERSON BLOOMINGTON SHIRLEY A. BONINE MAPLE PLAIN PHYLLIS CRIMMIN8 MINNEAPOLIS AMELIA M. DeMUSE MINNEAPOLIS CHARLES R. PIHL ORONO MALCOLM O. REID SHOREWOOD DONALD C. RINGHAM MINNEAPOLIS RAYMOND N. SEAGREN MINNEAPOLIS ANNE-MARIE SOLENSKY MINNEAPOLIS CLIFTON E. FRENCH SUPERINTENDENT & SECRETARY TO THE BOARD SCHEDULE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS on proposed "POLICIES FOR DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT" Thursday, August 26, 1982 - 7 p.mo at New Hope City Hall 4401 Xylon Avenue North New Hope Thursday, September 2, 1982 - 3:30 p.m. at Hyland Hills Chalet 8800 Chalet Road Bloomington Thursday, September 16, 1982 - 7 p.m. at Powderhorn Community Center E. 34th St. & 15th Ave. So. Minneapolis Thursday, September 23, 1982 - 7 p.'m. in Community Room at Minnetonka City Hall 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka Thursday', September 30, 1982 - 7 p.mo in. Council Chambers at Maple Grove City Hall 9401 Fernbrook Lane Maple Grove If you wish to offer testimony at one of the above public hearings, please call Gen Desalvo or Marilyn Egerdal at 473-4693. American Legion Post 398 DATE JULY' 31, 1982 'GAMBLING REPORT CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE GROSS= $2385.00 ~11690.00 EXPENSES: _SALES TAX ~113..57 'SUPPLIES 394.77 PAYOUT AS PRIZES: $508,34 1400. O0 ~1853.38 6800.00 PROFIT: DISTRIBUTION OF PROFITS: LEGION BASEBALL UMP. MINN. SHERIFF ASS' N. FE~S ~336.00 8O.OO CHECKING ACCOUNT ~727.70 ~a5o5.1o i??? AUGUST 1982. WESTONKA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE "CHAMBER WAVES" THEiANNUAL GOLF DAY will be held at Red Oak Golf Course at 6:00 p.m., Thursday, August 26. Cha,irman, Jack Diesing, promises an excellent evening i.ncluding prizes, a steak dinner and libations. Cost - $10.00 per person. Please call in reservations to the Chamber Office, 472-6780, by August 20. GOLF DAY replaces the August General meeting~ Let's have a big turn out for this fun evening. PRESIDENT'S LETTER: The historic occasion of the Westonka Chamber of Commerce, Inc. sponsored meeting in- volving the downtown renovation of Mound, proved to be a resounding success. Now, the difficult part - the implementation of architect's plan is ahead of us. This has been a busy year for your Chamber. August should be a fun month. Let's all enjoy the golf outing. Please try to attend - it is a means of getting to know the people in the Westonka area'. Jerry Longpre, President MANAGER'S CORNER: .~r s~x weeks on the job, I have been able to make an important observation. There is ite expectation from the public at large as to the Chamber's role as an information cen'ter. We receive many inquiries (both by phone and mail) each week from individuals and companies interested in relocating into our area. These obvious sources of new commerce and community energy should be encouraged in their enthusiasm for our area. To that end, I will be compiling lists of Chamber members (realtors, apartment complexes, types of bus- inesses, professionals, etc.) for distribution, and organizing office procedures that will effectively expedite this procedure. The Chamber also receives a number of information publications each month. These will be available to any member attending the general monthly meetings. Finally, after this short tenure, I feel as though a little of the dust is beginning to settle. At first, I felt that there was so much to do that the task might be overwhelming. However, now each week is more organized and more productive than the last. My heart is especially warmed by the many people who have taken.the time and effort to extend their hands and knowledge so that I might more quickly become effective in the job. This is indeed a very special time to be in this very special place, and I am enjoying the opp- ortunity. Thank you'.'. Chic Remien, Chamber Manager D~ ;TOWN MOUND ADVISORY COMMITTEE UPDATE: Th6 public information meeting held on July 28 was a definite success. About 75 people led out to hear the architects' and landscape designer's plans. Paul Pond organized the ng. introduced the Downtown Advisory Committee, and recounted its history. Mary Campbell did an excellent job of organizing the landscaping display. Thank you Paul, Mary and all their helpers. NEW BOARD ~MEMBERS: We. have two new Chamber Board members - Audry Schultz replaces Chic Remien as Director at Large, and Jerry Rockvam replaces Alan Bell as Director rePresenting Spring Park. Sp~eaking of Audrey Schultz, as this is being written, she is a patient at Mt. Sinai Hos- pital. Get well Audrey'. The typing is getting backlogged'.'. NEW CHAMBER MEMBERS: We welcome new Chamber members: Tim and Tom's, John Burger, Howard Sundby, and Village Professional Building. If you were not at the July General meeting, you missed a very fine speech on time manage- ment, by John burger. Thank you, John'. See you at Red Oak, Thursday, August 26, 6:00 p.m. Don't forget to make reservations. Bring a friend, tool "WORKING TOGETHER", Your Westonka Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors RW/sg August 4, 1982 300 Metro Square Building Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone 612/291 - 6359 Thomas T. Feeney, Area Manager Minneapolis-St..Paul Area Office Department of Housing and Urban Development 220 Second Street South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 RE: HUD Section 202 ProgramApplications Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 10589-1, 10597-1, 10600-1 through 10618-1 Dear Mr. Feeney: At its meeting on July 29, 1982, the Metropolitan Council considered the applications for HUD Section 202 Program funds. This consideration was based on a report of the Human Resources ComJnittee, Referral Report No. 82-79. A copy of this report, which was adopted as presented, is attached. The Council adopted the following recommendations contained in the report: The following three applications for housing of handicapped persons do not specify site locations. Given the demonstrated need for such housing, these applications should be. resubmitted for A-95-review if they are selected for final consideration and more complete information is available for review. Referral Number Applicant Location e 10600 National Handicap Housing St. Paul Institute 10605 Community Involvement Programs Minneapolis 10609 Broadway Towers Inc. Minneapolis The following proposals for housing of elderly persons are listed below in rank order of priority based upon the Council's policies for the review of proposals for assisted housing of the elderly. All of the proposals are consistent with the Development Framework and Council environmental protection policies. Anoka County 0 C~rver County 0 D~kota County 0 Hennep/n County 0 Rarnsey County 0 Scott County 0 Washington County Thomas T. Feeney, Area Manager Minneapolis-St. Paul Area Office Department of Housing and Urban Development August 4, 1982 Pag~ Two 300 Metro Square Sa{-~ Paul, Mianesota 5~10~ Telephone 612/29!- Referral Rank Number Project Name - Units Proposed Site Co~u.nity 1 10617 2 10607 3 10615 4 · 10616 5 10604 5 10606 7 10597 7 10603, 7 10613 7 10614 11 10608 12 10602 13 10~89 14 10610 14 10601 16 10611 17 10618 18 10612 Northwest Area~Housing - 74 Garden Terrace - 41 Kenzie Manor - 49 Eden Prairie Residence - 61 East Shore P%ace - 61 Crystal VOA - 80 Miller/Summit Place - 100 Phalen Park Manor - 100 Walker Residence - 53 Central Place - 65 Westonka Estates - 41 Moore View - 60 Lions Manor - 63 Magnolia Senior Housing - 36 Gideon Pond - 60 Lincoln Hills Court - 67 Tim's Greenwich Court - 42 Crestview Residences 1I - 75 Maple Plain & Rogers Little Canada St. Anthony : Eden Prairie Mahtomedi Crystal St. Paul St. Paul~ Minneapolis St. Paul Mound Fridley Anoka St. Paul Bloomington Richfield Blaine Columbia Heights Sincerely, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Charles R. Weaver Chairman CRW:bm Attachment cc: Applicants Affected Communities Wayne Nelson, Metropolitan Council Staff .__. ~ ;ney Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropo~tan Area Compnmn~: .... ~ ...... ~ ~-~-~ ~,,~- ~ ~enne~in CountT 0 ~amsey Count~ 0 Scot~ ~ounty 0 Washington County MINUTES OF THE JUNE 10, 1982 MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION MEETING Present: Co-Chair Cathy Bailey and Cheryl Burns; Commissioners Delores Ma~s, Andy Gearhart, Lowell Swenson and Toni Case; Park Director Chris Bollis and Secretar~ Marge Stutsman. Council Representative Pinky Charon and Commissioner Phyl.lis Jessen were absent and excused. Chair Ca.thy Bailey opened the meeting. MINUTES The minutes of the Park Commission meeting of May 13, 1982 were presented for consideration. Gearhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion to approve the minutes of May 13~ 1982 Park'Commission meeting as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Steps down' to CommonS'frOm'Canary Lane Mr. & Mrs. Robert Dybing, Mr. & Mrs. Tod Holmberg, Mitchell Erickson, Mark Richard-. son, Tim and Nora Harrell and Leo Bullock were present regarding s~eps down to the Commons from Canary Lane on Harrlson Bay. The Park Director explained that he has had a request from the area residents for. a sta!rway to Wiota Commons from Canary Lane. The present stairway on the Commons in front of Dybing's residence.was erected by a former resident and now is in hazardous condition. The bank is steep and there is erosion of the soil. The residents present asked the City to install the stairway; no way to get down to lake except-sliding or going through someone's yard; clay soil--gets very slip- pery. Discussed. Park Director thought perhaps there might be some funds in the capital outlay fund. The residents present agreed to remove the present stairway if the City put in a new stairway. Gearhart moved and Maas seconded a motion to recommend that the City of Mound construct a'.new stairway at the end of south Canary Lane for the obvious reason Of safety and for the use of the neighborhood residen~that have the right to use the dedicated Commons, based on the final approval of the City Council and on the recommendation of the City Manager. Major reason for the motion is that there is no other stairway access on'Wiota Commons within 4 blocks. The vote on the motion was unanimously in favor. Note: Residents asked to be notified of the Council meeting when this will be heard. Request to operate a ConceSsiOn Stand - Mound Bay Park Applicant Adolph Phipps was not present. No action taken. Request to amend Ordinance to prohibit motorized race or course on the Lake Discussed Mr. Regan's request for an Ordinance change. Not clear what is requested; but the Commission is against motorized race track or course on the Lake. Swenson moved and Burns seconded a motion that the Park Commission has no objec- tion to the request to amend the ordinance to read: "Motorized water craft or motorized automobile race track or course is prohibited." The vote was un- animously in favor. Park Commission Minutes June 10, 1982 - Page 2 Mi'scellaneous Reports :' There were none. July Meeting_ The Park Commission de~ided to meet on the regular date of July 8th only if needed. The Park Commission scheduled their annual par. k tour for July 15th. The tour wi.ll start with a picnic at Ba'I)ey's residence at 6:00 P.M. Adjo~'rnment .Burns moved and Gearhart seconded a motion to .adjourn the meeting. All in favor, so .meeting Jdjour. ned at 8:35 P.M. July 27,~ 1982 Commissioner of Parks and Recreation City of'~ound Mound, Minn. 55364 Dear Commissioner, The following families of Bluebird and Avocet Lanes in Three Points would like to put in a request for steps .leading down to the Commons at the end of each lane. These steps are in the area facing Harrison Bay of Lake Minnetonka. There was a step leading down to the lake in the middle of Bluebird and Avocet Lanes, but the families always have to cross adjoining.lands to get to those steps, which make the people that own these lands sometimes very unhappy. If the Parks and Playgrounds would 10ok into this problem, we would be very appreciative. Thank you: D.' '.:>,"-~..'-" .'"-, ~' .~'" '. ") !'"/ .' v, ..'~ ~ /,, .~ w~ ./,; ;...';,~. ,..:,,. f~,., ? . "., ". -. I ~" ~ ! ':.× ', .,, .... k.._O ' 6 W ? r ,,ccz'7 z.4/d · ,,.--z 'V' ., ,.,¢ ... ',. ,..-.~.. 7 ) ..p i I,-: ' ..,y,r ct c ' "' ,."',; ~ ,.,' I V " N Il\ / / /"7~? Mound Conth~ued from page ~ ,~.. "'There is a conUnulng ou.t-migra- ~nunit~; "lts'ibuildlngS 'are in good' .tion. of small businesses .replaced shape. -"~ ~:. -:: ..-. ' ' fragile system. There are not a .lot .. Th~. report COncentrates o~ what . of businesses, and several are tn"[ 'downtown Mound Could lo~.k like competi~on With each other*** he shbpowners and city resid/~nts got~'' follow, the 'path of suburbs such .as'.. ~What the.'city, n'eed~, tile repofi WayT. a/a, which has seea .'an 'in; -~ *said/is:'a.theme that will give cus~ crease in local business since the · - tomers the impression that Mo[thd · city's' downtown was ~. ren0vated.'.~-:'is'~arm, ft/n ani~'frtendl~**.'.Mound;s a. pl~n to 'renovate down.town' with/ii .The 'a,r?fte~:~' 'P~'o~l-~.hs~n~ing incentiv, es..for busin~?h~tt folj[~':;.iMOUn'tls looks by. plantlng~trees, community=.,~-~development, block :~.Cit~ officials aren t..s,ure:how.:the~. · pay a. portion.'~ ~f< the '~ int/~rest~'~..The~ also.must' get. appro';al :from,i "-.-". · chat:ged 'by.banks "on '$100,000 in?-~ the county, tb ~plan~ ~ees' in '.d0wn~ of $100,000 for cbmmerCial r. enov~/;..!~:berS say that the trees ~.wot~ld ob-.' .So' fa~;~ fivd b'u~ine~s~ h~/~e aPPiieif-%-eV~n had p~-oblert~ getting appr0v?i. · fo~;'~ $'/50 .'grants to I~elp. pay.. f'or:., al fOr'flowerpots recently plac'ed.~i~[ ute to.the appearance, of the down- * ~ Persiste~c~"cbuld': bring- good town area.'i thi/tk anything we can -. things to...~ound*s ;downtown? Longpre '5~0 //l~plied for a'~grant,/' dra'.~er and gather ~ust, he said.. begin"renovafln§ the.i..r, store.fro.his, other~ will follow. '....~..~.~. .... ~ .., "The potential, is so great here. We*re missing out on it*** he said. officials "~d' businesspeople hope that. their plan .will attract ~:ustomers": from. Oro~o,. Navarre and Spring Park, said Paul Pond, chairman of the city*s.downtown advisory committee. · ... Under the committee*s di'recti°n, the city hired two architectural firms, Ernst A~ociates .and John Weidt Associates, to come up. with a new design for downtown. The architects gave their answer last month in a.$4,000 report. The report pointed out that the city has some good features. The down- town is close to lake. shore; it is August 18, 1982 CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: RE: CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER OCCUPATIONAL MEDICAL CLINIC Enclosed is a flyer on the clinic that Bill Husbands has recommended the City use on workman's compensation cases. It sounds like a very complete program and will be a most valuable tool for us in our insurance manage- ment efforts. Please feel free to drop in on them for a tour, if you are downtown° JE:fc intelligent decisions in disability nmnagement_. OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE CL1NIC ..xeturning injured workers to the workplace Everyone involved in a work- related disability pays a price. For the employee, an- industrial injury, or illness ' may tr~nslnt~ into temporar~ or permanent disability, loss of self-sufficiency, lowered self-esteem, and a lost sense of belonging. For the em- ployer, an employee's work- related disability means lost time on the job, dimlni~hed productiw'ty, and economic llnhility. Everyone pay~ Pre- vention, early in~rvention and comprehensive follow- up are essential if costs are to be contained and dis- Abbott Norflnvestem Hospital/ Sister Kenny Institute offers a unique program in .di~bflity mamgemenL The Occupational .Medicine Clinic is committed compensation costs by. [] preventing work-related ino juries from happening · providing irnmecliate medical .care f~ the injured employee requires a team effort. To meet this goal, the Occupa- tional Medicine Clinic works closely witl~ [] employers [] employees [] Worker's Compensation [] q, ml~fied rehabilitation [] private physiciam [] attorneys The Clinic staff w~l design a custo~ action strategy to meet individual employer needs in the management of workers compensa~on concerns. Suite 211 Medical Office B' 2545 Chicago Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 -- BEF0 RE -0R-II2k SS-(SC-CI3gS Reduction of Hazards The Occupational Medicine Team will survey the work environ- ment, specifically for job ha- zards such as excessive noise, inadequate lighting, improper handling of chemical~ and ex- cessive dust and furne~ The survey team w~l observe em- ployees in their use of .lifting techniques and body mechanic~ A narrative report with photo- graphs is generated by the survey team and is presented to management. Pre-l~nployment Screenings Physical examinations am given to each employee to insure that every employee is physic- ally matched for the job he or she is to perform Occupational categories will determine the type of screening necessary to arrive at a good employee job matck Pm-employment screerv ings are necessary to identify the second injury applicant and to insure that affinmtive action guidelines are fonowe~ The most effective disability insurance is a welMe~gned prevention plan. The Oc- cupational Medicine Clinic ' providem Job Analysis Vocational liaison counselors will be responsible for preparing a job analysis of the specific occupa~onal cat- egories found within the work environment. The job analysis includes the physical require- ments and job tasks of each occupational category. The completed job. analysis can be used for effective employee job match and job training, and allows for job information to be quickly retrieved and used when an injured employee Education Training of em- ployees and supervisors is given by Ocmpafional Medidne Clinic instructors who are q, mlified health professionals with ex- pertise in providing injury pre- vention educational programs. Areas of training include body mechanics, low back education, chemical dependency awarenes~ mental health awareness, and first-aid treatment. WHEN AN INJURY OR IL SS OCCURS 2d-Hour Clinic Services An examination and diagnosis is done mediately to determine the nature and severity of a work-related injt~, or illness. The retzum-to-work strategy and treatment begins after the physician examines the em- ployee and makes a diagnosis. At the direction of the Chief of Occupational Medicine, a voca- tional lioi~n counselor coordi- nates the return-to-work stra- tegy ~th the employer to the comprehensive services resources available at Abbott Northwestern Hospital/ Sister Kenny Institute, the Occupational Medicine Clinic is able to provide preventior~ education, medical, clinical and vocational ser~4ces. Treatment T~atment services amiable at Abbott No~ Hospital/Sister Kenny Institute include physical therapy, thera- peutic exercise, occupational therapy, chemical dependency, mental health and complete vocational services to shorten the reactivation process. Treat- ment and/or referral to special- ists w~l not occur until author- ization is received by the third party payi~r. Early intervention is the key strategy after an injury occurs. The Occupational Medicine Clinic provides: Communication The diagnosis, treatment, referral, and return- to-work recommendations for injured employees are eom- municated to the employer within 24 hours after the examinatior,- The employer receive a written medical report covering diagnosis and treat- ment within 72 hours following the examination. Physical Reactivation Process The physical reactivation pro- cess includes therape~c physical exercise, physical therapy, oc- cupational therapy and other treatments deemed appropriate to facilitate the healing process of the diagnosed injury. If the third party payer agree~ the Occupational Medicine physi- cian may see the injured em- ployee on a daily basis to insure that the recommend- ations for treatment have been followed and a rem-to-work will occur as early as possible.' /??/ AFFER AN INJURY OR II INESS OCCURS To achieve the goal"of re- turning injured workers to. the workplace; the Occupa- tional Medicine Clinic pro- vide~ Fol~ow-Up and Monitoring Activities The Occupational Medidne Team performs eom- pmhens~ monitoring and folk~ up services to insure success in medical restoration and job retention once the employee retnms to work. To aid in the retention process of the pro- ductive employee, the Occupa- tional Medicine Team offers expertise in areas of job mod- ification, job analysis, flex time, job sharing and reduction of : environmental barriers. Impartial Return-to-Work mimtions are made by the Occupational Health physidar,., including a comprehens/ve re- - view of all medical reports, x- rays, and a thorough physical examinatior~- A medical report on diagnosis, treatment re- commendations, and determi- nation of return-to-work status, and, if requested, a disability rating. The d~ability rating w~l follow the American Medical Association's "Guide to Per- source will receive a written medical report within 72 hours following the examination. The Occupational Medicine Clinic welcomes questions about management of dis- ability in the work place. By woridng together with employers, the Otxmpational Medicine Clinic can help minimize the cost and fi'us- trations that sccompany in- dustrial injuries and illness. For further information, cae _OCCUPATIONAL ME, DICLNE Telephone: 612 874-4555 · 'CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1'155 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Paul Pond and Jon Elam Rob Chelseth 17 August 1982 DAC Agenda Enclosed please find a draft memorandum for distribution to the DAC. Before mailing, I would llke your review and comment. An attempt has been made to spell out the significant accom- plishments DAC has made on its Group 1 objectives, and suggest some possible areas in which DAC may proceed. RC/ms Attachment I??$ CITY of MOUND MEMORANDUM 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1'155 TO: Downtown Advisory Committee FROM: Rob Chelseth, City Planner DATE: 20 August 1982 SUBJECT: Progress on the Action Plans for the Revitalization of Downtown · ~ Mound Attached please find a copy of the minutes from the DAC's' public meeting held on July 28th. With the completion of the Downtown .Des.ign Guide Plan, and the establishment'of technical assistance and loan pools for building rehabilitation, the DAC has gone a long way toward completing the top priority objectives as identified under Group # 1 in its action plans (Section I of the "Comprehensive Evaluation and Plan for Downtown Mound"). Specifically, the following status report-outlines the major accomplishmentS, and suggests possible follow-up work. Group'# 1: Downtown improvement Projects Objective I.B. The need to plan and provide technical assistance to update store fronts, signs and the rear of stores;, and, assist in finding financing to assist in such activities. *largely accomplished through design guide and loan program DAC has established. You have provided a Cesign framework, and offered needed' financial assistance. : 0bje~tive II.A. The need to improve the generai' appearance of downtown through repainting, and landscaping such. as.planting plan for planters, trees, shrubs and furniture. *The conceptual layout of this objective has been.ach'ieved in the design plan, what remains is the funding and detailed planning for the project. Although DAC can contribute its support to ideas for funding this pro- ject, its'final success will require the active support of downtown businesses, the general public, and finally the City Council. Discus-. slons on this are underway on several fronts (Chamber, City Manager's Office, etc.). ' - Objective liE. The need for a dOWntown informational directory, as well as public as public toilets, phones and drinking fountains not located in retail businesses. *The same situation as Objective IIA, the overall design work is done; the public funding sources must now be secured. - ./??y Memorandum to Downtown Advisory Committee August 20, 1982 - Page 2' Objective IIF. The need for highway.signs to identify major com- munity facilities. Objective .VIC. The need for better signage identifying parking lots. *Both of these objectives are partially addressed in the design guide. Since they call for implementation using City resources and person- nel, DAC may wish to meet directly wity City Staff to discuss possible sign.formats, and identify locations for sign installation. Objective VllA. The need for'a single identity or theme for Downtown' Mound. *The DAC has suggested its ideas through the design guide. Imple- mentation will result when structures are rehab in accordance with the guide's recommendations. '- ~ The DAC has gone a long way toward completing its major, top-priority objec- tives. You have put forth many .specific ideas and proposals, and asked people to react and support your recommendations. I congratulate you.on the great amount of time and effort you have contributed to date, and look forward to assisting you'in.any, manner deemed necessary to advance this program forward. Rob Chelseth City Planner Re/ms Encl. Minutes * MOund's Downtown Advisory Committee 6:30 p July 28 We~tonka Community Center public.meet?ng. ..... Committee members, gathered to suryey'the meeting room and exhibit of plants, shrubsj and'a tree arranged by Chic Remien'of the WestonkaArea chamber and committee member Mary Campbell. The honey locust tree which had been slated for a ceremonial planting could~not be planted'because of a faulty hydraulic hose..on the truck. I.n~tead .it was planted the followigg day. The public portion of the meeting started at approximately 7:40 p. Jerry. Longpre, president of the Westonka Area Chamber of Commerce~..welcomed the audience. He .said: New. people and new ideas are the life-blood of any community, iAnd a community is what its downtown is. Longpre also thanked MayorLindlan and,the current City Council for establishingdowntown reno- vation as a priority." He mentioned an editorial.in the Wed July 21Mpls. Star & Tribune which spoke well of City Manager..Jon Elam. He boasted of the Chamber's attempt this spring to add sprakle to the'streets with "chamber pots". Longpre envisions the day when the Mpls/St. Paul magazihe will mention downtown Mound.in. their description of. day-trips to Lake Minnetonka. He introduced Paul Pond. Paul told how the committee has dealt'pretty much with paper work. He displayed a stack of paper, for the audience to see.~ Since he .took over as the committee's chairman in June of 1981, the task has been to develop and implement a plan for the renovation of downtown Mound. ~The first,three months were occupied with curb cuts, crosswal ks, and streetlight recommendati OhS for the road project on County llO. When those recommendations.were completed, the committee took a bus tour' to determine the boundaries of the downtown study area. Consumers and business persons were surveyed. 'One goal is to encourage area residents to spend more of the money they earn in Mound. Pond said Mound could be a. community center for shOpping, but..in fact it functions as a neighborhood center, Most dollars are spent for convenience items. He told of the committee's brainstorming session, which resulted in a 71-page document to the City Council. .The resUlting plan-aims, to upgrade Mound's streetscape, landscape, bui.ldi.ng .fronts. and .rears, and add trees, shrubs, flowers, and pedestrian spaces. Basically,: the plan incorporates what.the consumers and business persons .say they.want. Paul~ introduced MayOr Rock Lindlan. 'Mayor Lindlan thanked the committee for performing splendidly. He said the success of the program depends upon a linkage of .public and private funding. The council is confidenl~ and we will make it work in some way. '"'I've been' chewing at this for 20, years -'and we can do it now if we all put our backs to it. Paul introduced Jori Elam, saying Elam.had kept the committee, on the straight and narrow.and was the person havi.ng the bi.ggest impact on the .committee's work. ~Ac/2 , Elam emp~ained some of the financial implications to.the plan which he hopes will result in new storef?onts. Be explained how the council has. earmarked funds from' commudlty'deielOpment block" grant money~tO !a) aid wi th design services .and b) subsidize interest to make loan money available at a 'lesser.' rate to local merchants for the purpose of..renovat'tng storefronts, etc. If it works, it will be an exciting and. inhoyati.¥e too.l, 'he said,adding the city is ready to'go. Businesses can submit plans 'now: The public piece of the plan, t'he landscaping and streetscaping, will need funding..,The entire commun.ity will benefil~. The CBD [central business district) already pays for snow plowing'and removal';'the'parking lots, and streetlights. Elam hesitates to hand them a bill for landscaping, too. The downtown ·is not a strong business community, he said.. LandscaPing may cost $75,000 or more. Gene Ernst and John Weidt proceeded with their slide and display presentation. They credited the contractors who had supplied materials, as well as Mary Campbell ,. whom Weidt called "a human~dynamo". · Weidt called the proposed 'theme concept "a cottage community, that·has devel- oped over time". That, he said, is what is an honest theme for Mound. Theme is an identity. It sets one place apart.from another.' It is a first impression and a lasting"impression. It is a feeling, not a facade. It ties a town together. Gene Ernst described ways to make pedestrian access.more pleasant.- plazas, benches, plantings, trees, walkways, planting islands in parking lots, special paving as well as trees in the walkWays, lighting, s.lgnage. And flowers. They give sparkle and'excitement. Furniture, benches, fountains, a kiOsk. " Ernst and Weidt said. Mound has kept Lost Lake "in the back it has tremendous potential for-development. They think They said that where the plan. goes now is up to the business community and the total'-community. Now the work real~ly s-tarts. They recommended following through with the.design process: 1 - the problem 2 - process 3 - concepts 4 - schematic drawings 5 - design and development 6 - construction drawings 7 - bid and award of bid 8 - construction supervision 'Questions were accepted from the audience. When does the 60-day application period start? Elam: right now What is the time frame for the project? It depends on money at the front end. Perhaps up to five years.' Wayzata did their renovation in six months, but they put together a tax /??? DAC/3 Do the trees slow the traffic down? Are trees and advertising compatible? increment financing 'packet. Trees have a tremendous ~impact on-people. They can be. H.B.R. Larson from the school di~tri'c~.asked for a ~rochure of the plan. Jerry Kohls said the arena people plan sod for the north, side of ~he building for now. Arena people are very open for sulggestions. They.will .work with committee. Displays of the plan will be-on Publicview a~ the State Bank of~.Mound. Paul. Pond thanked the Westonka.Area Chamber for their.sponsorship of the. meeting. The meeting ended at approximately 10:O0 p/ Diane Arneson, Secretary If I recall correctly, all committee members .were present except for Dave~ Willette and Donna Quigley.~ Good show'. ...... After the meeting, Ron Norstrem gave me the two ~boxes of slides the committee purchased from Ernst and Weidt.. "I am giving those slides to Rob Chelseth along with these minutes. Just for the record,-so people know where they are. Following coverage of the plan and public meeting in local newspapers, the Mpls. Star and Tribune published a featur~ story on the downtown plan in their Community magazine, the week of August 9. Jerry Longpre was pictured and a part of one of the designer's elevations was shown along with the story. August 16, 1982 Editor, The Laker 5571 Auditors Road Hound, MN 55364 Dear Editor: JOHN BURGER 3750 Bayside Road Long Lake, MN 55356 Phone (612) 473-3559 last Monday my wife, Mary Jane, and ! attended the Mound Plannir~ Commission meeting, and on Tuesday evening, the Mound City Council meeting. Both experiences gave us feell~s of confidence and warm satisfaction about Mound City Coverumeut. Not only did we accomplish our own per- sonal business but we also saw local government at its best in handling various matters before it. Mary Jane and ! had gone to seek approval to put a temporary canvas banner ou the new Independent Republican Headquarters office, located at 5307 Shoreline Boulevard--the Hole In One RestaurantaBuildin~. That's my campai§n office as I run for the state Legis- lative Seat.43A...and I was before the Planning Co~nfasiou to ask their ap- proval of my proposed identification banner. After some friendly joshiug about the current ~olitical scene and much careful and ~oughtful delib~ration abo~t my specific sitisatiou, the Coumlission passed a reso~ution reco~ending grantin~ of my request for a 2~' x 20' temporary banner across the top of the buildi~. Then on Tuesda~ evening, the very next night, the Commission resolution came up aa a late item on the very full Council agenda. That nizht the Council, before a room full of citizen%debated and took action on pla~s for street, curb, and storm sewer proposals, plans for a beautiful up~rading and landscaping job on the depot and city park, and other matters of broad social concern. The deliberations ware thorouih, thoughtful and considerate of all concerned. Near the end of the evening, my banner'proposal vas approved, and l~as co~manded by one Council member for havin~ come to get approval for my plans, as required by the Mound ordinance. These t~o evenings ~ith Hound City'government officials confirmed for me that our Mayor, CouncllMambers, and Staff are doing their job commendably. In fact, I was so impressed that I strongly urge every citizen :o spend an evening or ~o soon in watching these people do their work. You, too, will build respect, gain confidence, and show appreciation for what they are doing and how well they are doint it. Personally and publicly for all who ~ould Join me I say, "Thanks for your prompt and courteous service. You do E~d work!" Stncere~ cc: Mayor Rock Liudlan ~,~ and associates urger, ~andidate for Legislative Seat ~3A /??? AGENDA Minnehaha Creek Watershed District August 19, 1982 Wayzata City Hall 7:30 p.m. Call to order; present, absent, staff. Reading and approval of minutes of regular meeting 7/15/82. Approval or amendment of 8/19/82 agenda. Hearing of permit applications. 81-119 Alvin Quist - lakeshore setback variance request, intersection of County Rd. 125 and Marlboro Lane, Emerald Lake, Mound. Bo 82-22 Methodist Hospital - 11,000 sq.~ ft. building addition, Excelsior Blvd. adjacent to Minnehaha Creek, St. Louis Park. 82-57 John Hrkal - fill on private lot, drainage improvements, County Rd. 24, Plymouth. 82-61 T.W. Ess - shoreline erosion protection, railroad tie retaining wall, Halsteads Bay, Minnetrista. 82-62 Ed Yeager - rip-rap shoreline erosion protection, Gideon Bay, Lake Minnetonka. 82-63 Independent School District #284 - grading and drainage plan for a central storage facility, Oakwood School property, Plymouth. 82-64 Schlee Builders - "Boni-Highlands," 42 unit townhouse complex,.Trista Lane and CSAH 92, St. Bonifacius. 82-65 ~Ronald Pelarski - lake setback variance for construction of single family home, Jennings Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Mound. 82-66 Frank Beddor, Jr. - beach sand blanket, south shore of Christmas Lake, Chanhassen. ne 82-67 Frank Beddor, Jr. - beach sand blanket, right-of-way easement, Christmas Acres, south shore of Christmas Lake, Chanhassen. 82-68 William Niccum - channel dredging and rip-rap, Harrison Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Mound. 82-69 Richard Douglas - rip-rap shoreline erosion protection, Clay Cliff· Addition, Tonka Bay. 000 Se Me 8'2-70 Larry Hendrickson - rip-rap shoreline erosion protection, Bay Cliffe, Upper Lake Minnetonka, Minnetrista. Ne 82-71 Kenneth L. Sporre - lakeshore setback variance for garage structure, Black Laker Lake Minnetonka, Spring Park. 82-72 City of Minnetonka - sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer and street projects, Red Oak Townhomes, Minnetonka. 82-73 South Shore Communities, Inc. - "South Shore Manor," 67 unit apartment complex, Excelsior. Correspondence. Hearing of requests for petitions by public for action by the Watershed District. Reports of Treasurer, Engineer and Attorney. A. Acting Treasurer's Repo~Y~ - Mr. Thomas (1) Administrative Fund Report B. Engineer's Report - Mr. Panzer (1) Status Reports (a) CP-7 Minnehaha Creek Channel Improvements at West 44th Street (b) Water Maintenance and Repair Fund (c) CP MCWD/Minneapolis Creek Study (d) Bridge Obstruction/Minnehaha Creek (2) City of Minnetonka Drainage Plan (3) Informational~Items C. Attorney's Report - Mr. Macomber ..- (1). Rule~and'Regulation Revision/Chapte~ 509 Unfinished Business. B. C. D. Rule and Regulation Revision/Chapter 509 District Initiated Maintenance Projects Bridge Obstruction Draft Permit Application Guidelines New Business. Adjournment· oo/ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT July 15, 1982 The regular meeting of July 15, 1982, of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District was called to order by Chairman Cochran at 7:35 p.m. at the St. Louis Park City Hall, St. Louis Park, M£nnesota. Managers Present: Cochran, Lehman, Gudmundson and Carroll Manager Absent: Thomas Also present were board advisors Panzer, Reep and Macomber. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the regular meeting of June 17, 1982 were reviewed. It was moved by Gudmundson, seconded by Carroll, that the minutes be approved as published. Upon vote the motion carried. Approval of Permit Applications The managers reviewed a memorandum from the engineer dated July 8, 1982 indicating that the following applications comply with the applicable standards of the district and recommending approval on the terms and conditions as set forth in his written memorandum: Pflaumwell Development Company - revised grading and drainage plan for '"Tealwood," a multi-unit residential development in Long Lake. 79-34 s - grading and drainage plan for a ily and duplex subdivision, Lost Lake area, City of Mound. 82-38 City of Minnetonka - utilities and street construction at Meadow Lane West, City of Minnetonka. 82-42 Kent E. Swanson - rip-rap shoreline erosion protection on Casco Point, Carman's Bay, City of Orono. 82-51 Carver County - floodplain development for Lake Minnewashta Regional Park public access, City of Chanhassen. 82-55 July 15, 19'82 Page 2 'City of St. Bonifacius - utilities and street construction for the extension of'·Tower Street,· City of St. Bonifacius. 82-56 The engineer orally advised the managers that t~e following application was also recommended by the engineer for approval subject to the terms and conditions as set forth in his written memorandum: Tim Foster - beach sand blanket, weed remoYal on south shore of Christmas Lake, City of Chanhassen. 82-58 Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Gudmundson, that the foregoing applications be approved subject to all terms and Conditions as recOmmended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried, Manager Carroll abstaining as to Application 82-56. ~ Tablin~ of Permit Applications It was moved by Lehman, seconded by Gudmundson, that the following application be tabled as recommended by the engineer until such time as all required exhibits have been received by the engineer: John Krkal - fill on private lot, drainage improvements, City of Plymouth. 82-57 Headwaters Control Structure Management Policy and Operation Procedures - Final' Draft At this time, Manager Cochran requested that the board amend the agenda to moue to Item 7bl, the engineer's report on the Headwaters Control Structure Management Policy and Operation Procedures - Final Draft, in light of the fact that members of the public were present for that discussion and no other permit applicants were present. The agenda being duly modified, Chairman Cochran stated that the board had received a revised draft of the · proposed Management Pol~c~ 6hanges from the staff dated July 8, 1982, and called upon the engineer to review the proposed changes contained in the present draft. Chairman Cochran stated that if the board found the proposed revisions to be acceptable, he anticipated that the board would approve the draft in concept and distribute it to municipalities and interested persons for review prior to final action by the Board of Managers. President Cochran then called on the engineer, Mr. Panzer, to review the revised draft of the document. Mr. Panzer reviewed the petition for the original creek improvement project which was filed with the District in 1973. July 15, 1982 Page 3 Mr. Panzer then reviewed the objectives of the original Management Policy of the Board of Managers adopted in November of 1977 following municipal and public review at that time. Mr. Panzer stated that a set of revisions was proposed by the Board of Managers and approved by the Minnesota Department of N~tural Resources in 1978. The engineer stated that as a result of the 1978 hearing, the managers received a number of comments indicating that the existing Management Policy was unnecessarily reducing discharges to the creek. The engineer stated that in response to the direction of the board, the staff prepared a preliminary draft proposal which was submitted to the board and which in February of 1982 the board reviewed and authorized to be distributed to the municipalities for review and comment. Mr. Panzer summarized the main features of the February 1982 draft and the comments received from municipalities and individuals with respect to that draft. The engineer stated that the board then directed the staff to revise the February 1982 proposal to incorporate the comments and suggestions received. Mr. Panzer stated that the draft dated July 8, 1982 accomplished this objective° The engineer then reviewed the July 8, 1982 draft. He stated that it contained three primary sections: I. Management Policy; II. Management Goals; and III. Operating Procedure. Mr. Panzer reviewed each of the individual sections of the proposed draft. Mr. Panzer reviewed each of the proposed discharge zones set forth in Section III of the memorandum and indicated which of the management goals the discharge zone is intended to accomplish. Mr. Panzer stated that Section III also describes data collection procedures, procedures for emergency adjustment of the structure in response to high water conditions and related matters. Upon conclusion of the engineer's presentation, Chairman Cochran called for comments from the Board of Managers. Manager Gudmundson noted that the project was originally identified as the Basic Land and Water Management Improvement Project for Minnehaha Creek. Manager Lehman stated that he believed~he staff draft dated July 8, 1982 accurately reflected what the board had asked for and complimented the staff on its efforts. Chairman Cochran then called for comments from any members of the public present who wished to address the board regarding this subject. July 15, 1982 Page 4 John Iacono, a resident of St. Louis Park, asked whether comments solicited from municipalities and individuals.could be substantive as well as editorial in nature. Manager Carroll responded that the board would certainly consider substantive comments submitted. Manager Carroll stated that it was his personal view that because of the substantial amount of public review %lhich had already occurred, that most substantive comments will have already been submitted to the board and that it was time for the board to act to approve the policy. Jim von Lorenz, a resident of St. 'Louis Park, indicated that he felt the base flow should commence at lake elevation 928.6 rather than 928.7 and that the proposed base flow of approximately 12 cfs was not adequate and should be increased. Dudley Parsons, a resident of Edina, complimented the managers on the revised document, stating that it contained a good statement of goals and contained valuable procedures for data collection. Mr. Parsons urged the board to adopt the policy and to carefully evaluate the results of implementation of the policy. Jerry Beek of the City of Minnetonka, inquired about the timing for approval of the document. He also requested that provisions be made in the Management Policy to provide for exactly, rather than approximately, the same discharge as existed with the prior structure. The engineer responded that all measurements were approximate because a variety of factors such as weed gro%~th will affect the actual discharge through 'the structure. The engineer further stated that some change from historic conditions is required in order to store water on the lake during periods of high"runoff for later controlled release to the creek. Richard Koppy, Director of Public Works, City of St. Louis Park, welcomed the Board of Managers to the City Council chambers. Mr. Koppy inquired as to the nature of the approval required from DNR, whether or not it is likely that DNR will .approve the policy in its present format, and whether DNR will hold a hearing. The engineer responded that DNR approval was required, that preliminary staff contact has occurred between the DNR staff and the Watershed District staff and that whether or not the DNR will hold a hearing is unknown since that is discretionary with the-Department of Natural Resources. Manager Gudmundson then stated that she had delivered to the board a proposed revised Introduction to the document which reflected historical aspects of the creek. Manager Gudmundson moved, seconded by Carroll,:that the substitute language proposed by manager Gudmundson be substituted in place of the present Introduction prior to distribution to the municipalties. July 15, 1982 Page 5 Manager Lehman indicated his view~ that these comments can be considered along with any other comments received by'the managers during the comment period but that he would not favor substituting the draft proposed by manager Gudmundson prior to the time for board and public review. Manager Carroll stated that he had no objection to including manager Gudmundson's document as an appendix to the staff draft and stated that the draft prepared by manager Gudmundson should be reviewed over the next review period. Manager Carroll inquired whether manager Gudmundson would amend the motion to provide that the Gudmundson substitute language be distributed as an appendix to the staff draft and manager Gudmundson indicated that she was willing to so amend the motion° Manager Gudmundson then stated that she wished to further amend the motion to amend to the staff draft a series of suggested revisions contained in a memorandum from Manager Gudmundson to the board dated July 15, 1982. Manager Lehman stated that he would not favor attaching the second document on the basis that those language changes can appropriately be considered during the review period. Manager Cochran stated that he would support attaching the Gudmundson substitute introductory language to the staff draft but not the second document. Whereupon, Manager Gudmundson withdrew the motion, Manager Carroll withdrew the second, and Manager Gudmundson moved that the substitute language for the introduction prepared by her be appended to the staff draft and circulated with the draft. The motion was seconded by Carroll. Upon vote the motion carried. Thereupon, Manager~ Carroll moved, seconded by Manager Lehman, that the Headwaters Control Structure Management Policy Revised Draft dated July 8, 1982 be adopted in concept by the Board of Managers because it. reflects the intent and direction of the board; further that the draft document be distributed to all municipalities within the district and all interested citizens; further that all comments on the proposed draft be received by the Board of Managers two weeks prior to' the September 16, 1982 meeting and further that the board express its intent to take final action at the September meeting and thereafter submit the revised Management Plan to the DNR requesting approval. Upon vote the motion carried. Representative Sally Olsen then addressed the Board of Managers indicating that she had just arrived from another meeting. Representative Olsen inquired of the engineer to what extent the comments and requests contained in her letter of May 17, 1982 had been incorporated into the present draft and whether or not the proposed Management Policy changes were being recommended for adoption over a trial period as recommended by July 15, 1982 Page 6 her. Th~ engineer responded that Representative Olsen's suggestions in her May 17 submittal had been incorPorated to the maximum extent possible. Chairman Cochran responded that the Management Policy is subject to revision at any time should the managers determine that the procedures adopted are not accomplishing the intended management objections. Representative Olden requested that the district, when it makes its submittal to the DNR, request that the policy changes be adopted on a two year trial basis. The Honorable Phyllis McQuade, Mayor of the City of Sro Louis Park, then addressed the board. MayOr McQuade welcomed the managers'to the St. Louis Park City Council chambers and stated on behalf of the citizens of St. Louis Park her appreciation for the efforts made by the aist~'ict~With respect to enhancement of Minnehaha Creek. Methodist Hospital - building addition to F-2 floodplain, Excelsior Blvd. adjacent to Minnehaha Creek, St. Louis Park. 82-22' James yon Lorenz inquired of the managers regarding the action taken by the board at the last regular meeting regarding ~ the permit application of Methodist Hospital. Mr. yon Lorenz stated that permits required from other governmental agencies had not been received by the hospital and questioned the action of the managers in approving a district permit prior to such action. Manager Cochran advised Mr. yon Lorenz that these facts were known to the managers at the time they acted on the application and were fully brought to the attention of the board by Mr. Gerald Dokka. Manager Cochran further stated that the action of the board at the last regular meeting was concept approval only and that the project will be back before the Board of Managers for review prior to authorization of any construction activity. Centurion Co. - grading and.drainage plan for "Auburn So.," a multi-unit residential development, City of ~opkins. 82-38 The engineer reviewed a request for a final grading and drainage plan for Auburn South. .The engineer reviewed the 'prior concept approval granted by the managers and advised the board that the final, plan was consistent with the concept approval previously granted. The engineer responded to inquiries from the managers. Following discussion, it was moved by Gudmundson, seconded'by Lehman, that the final grading and drainage plan be approved as submitted as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. July 15, 1982 Page 7 Mike Mal~ney/B. J. Lutz - grading and drainage plan for a four lot ~uplex subdivision~ City of Minnetonka. 82-52 The engineer reviewed the pending application'which had been tabled at the last regular meeting in order for the applicant to provide an easement over adjacent property used for storm water storage. The engineer advised the managers that upon a further review the increase in the peakout flow to the Windsor Lake system will be minimal and further advised the managers that the current drainage plan for the City of Minnetonka indicates that development of this property will not impact the Windsor Lake drainage. On that basis, the engineer recommended approval of the application as submitted without requiring the applicant to provide an easement to the City over the adjacent property. Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Gudmundson, that the application be approved as submitted as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. John M. Stone - aluminum retaining wall - shoreline erosion protection~ Harrison Bay, City of MoUnd. 82-53 ~ ames W. Rafferty - aluminum retaining wall - shoreline erosion rotection~ Harrison Bay, City of Mound. 82-54 The engineer reviewed these two applications for placement of aluminum retaining wall for shoreline erosion protection on a dead end channel. The engineer advised the managers that both properties were hidden from lake view by Sherwood Island at the entrance to the channel. Manager Cochran indicated that the board has approved similar vertical wall installations in previous instances on channels where the channel is not visible from the lake. Following discussion, it was moved' by Lehman, seconded by Carroll, that both applications be approved as submitted subject to the condition that the retaining wall be placed on the property at or above the 929.4 elevation. Upon vote the motion carried. J. Nicholas Ruehl - lake setback variance for Private residence, Gideon's Bay~ City of Excelsior. 82.359 The engineer reviewed the application for a variance from the district's'lakeshore setback requirement. The engineer advised the managers that the property does not front on the lake and was the only property on the peninsula in question. It was moved by Lehman, seconded by Cochran, that the application be approved as submitted subject to approval of the City Council of the City of Excelsior. Upon vote the motion carried, Manager Gudmundson abstaining. July 15, 1982 Page 8 Harrison'Shares, A Partnership - fill in the floodplain to deve bUildable lots, City of Moqnd. 82-60 . ~ ~ The engineer reviewed the application to develop two . buildable lots'in the floodplain of Lake Minnetonka and to provide compensatory storage exceeding the amount of the proposed fill. The managers noted that as a result of the proposed excavation to provide storage, lots 5, 6, 7 and 8 are placed in the floodplain below elevation 931.5 and thereby will become unbuildable. i Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Carroll, that the application be approved as submitted conditioned upon placement of a flowage easement over that part of lots 5, 6, 7 and 8 belo%; -elevation 931.5 to be created either in the plat of the property or by separate instrument. Upon vote the motion carried. Treasurer's Report ~" Manager Carroll distributed the treasurer's report dated July 15, 1982. Manager Carroll reviewed the report indicating that'the district had the fund balance as shown on the report available for investment. Manager Carroll advised the managers that the accountant, recommended investment of the sum in a certificate of deposit to mature September 16, 1982 and that the anticipated tax settlement to be received from.Bennepin County during the third week in July be invested in a repurchase agreement. Following discussion, it was moved by Gudmundson, seconded by Lehman, that the investments recommended by the accountant be made and authorized by the treasurer. Upon vote the motion carried. It was thereafter moved by Lehman, seconded by Gudmundson, that the treasurer's report dated July 15, 1982 be approved and the bills paid as set forth in that report with the addition on page 4 of said report that the payment made to the City of St. Louis Park from.the Water Maintenance and Repair Fund be entered on that page. Upon vote the motion carried. Upper Watershed Improvement Project/Painter Creek Workplan - Status Report The engineer reported on the status of the project as discussed at the last regular meeting of the advisory committee. The engineer reported that Robert Brown chaired the meeting and that thE-meeting included a discussion of the preliminary draft summary as requested by the advisory committee. The engineer further advised the managers that the advisory committee requested the board to proceed to authorize preparation of the preliminary engineering report on the project. The engineer indicated he has prepared a proposed format for the preliminary engineering report and requested that the outline be reviewed by the Board of oo? July 15, 1982 Page 9 Managers% The engineer further requested authority to commence preparation of the preliminary engineering, report; said report to be prepared by the engineer for the October 22, 1982 meeting. It was moved by Lehman, seconded by Gudmundson, that the engineer be authorized to prepare the preliminary engineering report on the Painter Creek Subwatershed work plan. Upper Watershed Lake Level Monitoring The engineer reported that arrangements had been made to read lake levels on Long Lake, Gleason Lake, Langdon Lake, Christmas Lake and that the Hennepin County Park Reserve District would monitor, lake levels within district regional parks. Minnehaha Creek Channel Improvements at West 44th Street - CP-7 The engineer and the attorney reported that the bonding company had indicated it wishes to retain UD Contracting to perform the work during the 1982-83 season. The attorney distributed a letter to the bonding company indicating the time schedule required if the bonding company is going to perform the work during the winter of 1982-83. Minnea~olis/MCWD Creek Study The engineer reported on the scope of the proposed study and indicated that the formal agreement has been sent to the City for approual by the City Council. Bridge Obstruction - 11907 Cedar Lake Road The engineer reported on the status of matters relating to the bridge obstruction at 11907 Cedar Lake Road. The managers discussed the alternatives available and directed the attorney and the engineer to follow up with Mr. Taylor and further evaluate the available alternatives. Adjournment There being no further business to come before the regular meeting, Chairman Cochran declared the regular meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Barbara R. Gudmundson Acting Secretary TWIN LABOI% CITIE8 MARKET INFORMATION LABOR FORCE CONDITIONS Vol. 6 No. 6 August ]982 The Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area continued to experience record high un- employment in June. In addition to the usual seasonal increase in unemployment from students and recent graduates flooding the labor market, the problem was compounded by additional.layoffs in durable goods manufacturing industries and educational ser- vices industries due to the recession and budget cutbacks. The unemployment rate is up substantially from the pre-recession level of last June, 4.6 percent, and also surpassed the previous record of 5.8 percent in June 1975. Employment growth between May and June fell short of the average Yor the past twelve years, 0.3 percent compared to 0.7 percent. However, labor force growth also was slower than in past years. This has been the case in recent months and is charac- teristic of a severe recession. People who normally would be seeking work in the area decide that the job market in too poor and decide not to look for work at this time. Although the national economy is beginning to show signs that the worst of the re- cession is over, it is also apparent that the recovery in 1982 is probably going to be rather weak. Construction and durable goods orders are being hampered by high interest rate. The July labor force egtimates will most likely reflect a sizeable seasonal contraction in the labor force caused by the end of the school year. L/U~OR FORCE ESTIMATES (not seasonally adjusted) AREA CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE TOTA~.ERPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT RATE 3unep May Juneo Junep May R Ouneo June~ May ~ 3une~ Ounepl May ~ Minneapolis- St. Paul SMSA* 1,174.g 1,163.0 1,177.7 1,100.4 1,097.1 1,122.9 74.S 65.9 54.8 6.3 5.7 4.6 County: .' Anoka ll1,304 110,645 lil,826 104,171 103,862 106,306 7,133 6,683 5,520 6.4 6.0 4.g Ca.er 20,928 20,739 20,942 19,690 19,631 20,093 1,238 1,108 849 5.9 5.3 4.1 Chtsago 14,601 '~4,643 14,475 13,668 13,628 13,948 933 1,015 797 6.4 6.9 5.4 Dakota 109,678 108,412 109,740 103,168 102,862 105,283 6,510 5,550 4,457 5.9 5.1 4.1 Hennepln 534,972 528,342 536,687 500,349 498,864 610,605 34,623 29,478 25,082 6.$ 5.6 4.7 R~sey 261,307 259,081 262,185 244,370 243,645 249,379 16,937 15,436 12,806 6.5 6.0 4.9 Scott 24,876 24,624 24,840 23,271 23,202 23,748 1,605 1,422 1,092 6.5 5.8 4.4 Washington 63,790 63,~54 64,084 60,362 60,183 61,599 3,428 3,271 2,485 5.4 5.2 3.9 Wright 33,429 1,986 33,650 31,335 31,243 31,980 2,094 33,229 1,670 6.3 6.0 5.0 City of Minneapolis 212,806 210,300 212,386 197,156 196,571 201,197 15,650 13,729 11,189 7.4 6.5 5.3 City of St. Paul 154,734 153,259 154,839 143,624 143,198 146,568 11,110 10,061 8,271 7.2 6.6 5.3 Minnesota* 2,213.9 2,168.2 2,220.4 2,053.6 2,023.8 2,101.1 160.3 144.4 119.4 7.2 6.7 5.4 United States* 111,569 109,914 109,904 100,683 99,957 101,419 10,886 9,957 8,485 9.8 9.1 7.7 P - Preliminary EHPLOYIdENT, HOURS AND EARNINGS tn the H1nneapolls-St. Paul ~etropolltan Area PERCENT PRODUCTION WORKERS' HOURS & EAPJ4ING~ FJ4PLOYMENT CHANGE INDUSTRY (0003 FROH Average geekly Average Hourly: Average geekly Earnings Earnings- Hours - ~lune Ponth Year Honth Year June Honth June 14onth June P~nth 1982 Ago Ago Ago Ago 1982 Ago 1982 Ago 1982 Ago TOT~ NONAGRICULTURAL 1077.0 1080.1 1102.C -0.3 -2.3 XX XX XX XX XX XX 14ANUFACTURI NG 234.8 233.9 243.7! 0.4 -3.6 375.41 373.67 9.48 9.46 39.6 39.5 Durable Goods 1fi0.4 149.8 157.4 0.5 -4.4 385.33 382.53 9.33 9.33 41.3 41.0 Lumber & good Products 4.61 4.1 4.8 13.1 -3.1 470.66 421.40 10.10 10.75 46.6 39.2 Furniture & Fixtures 1.5i 1.5 1.6 0.0 -6.4 302.48 303.36 7.96 7.90 38.0 38.4 Stone, Clay & Glass 3.0 2.8 3.1 7.4 -3.3 364.28 366.14 9.74 9.51 37.4 38.5 Primary Hetals 4.0 3.9 4.4 1.9 -9.1 326.86 313.02 8.67 8.46 37.7 37.0 Fabricated Metals 25.6 26.4 27.9 0.6 -4.7 443.50 439.74 10.46 10.47 42.4 42.0 Non-Electrical Machinery 60.8 61.5 63.8 -1.0 -4.7 380.89 378.73 9.29 9.26 41.0 40.9 Electrical Yachtnery 17.4 17.3 18.6 0.8 -6.3 341.11 343.58 8.18 8.20 41.7 41.g Transportation Equtpemnt 3.8 3.8 3.B 0.0 1.2 473.52 482.8C ll.41 11.36 41.5 42.5 Other I~rablesl_/ 28.6 28.4 29.4 0.9 -2.8 364.14 354.5C 8.68 8.71 40.8 40.7 Nondurable Goods 84.4 84.2 86.3 0.2 -2.2 360.14 359.641 9.76 9.72 36.9 37.0 Food & Kindred Products 18,7 18,4 18,6 1,8 0,5 334,06 334,48 8,98 9,04 37,2 37,0 Texttles& Apparel 2,3 2,6 3,3 -14,9 -31,1 191;57 196,45 6,14 6,12 31,2 i 32,1 Paper & Allied Products 24,4 24,2 24,2 0,7 .0,7 390,06 390,06 9,85 9,85 39,61 39,6 Printing & Publishing 23,6 23,6 23,5 -0,2 0,2 364,97 365,50 10,83 10,75 33,7' 34,0 Ch~ical Products 6.0 6,0 $,4 0,7 -6,8 367,78 369,61 9,86 9,88 37,3 37,4 Petrnleum Prnducts 1,5 1,5 1,5 0,6 -3,9 472,65 468,22 11,39 11,42 41,5 41,0 Rubber & Leather Prnducts 8,0 8,0 8,7 0,1 -8,5 345,8C 343,27 g,lO 8,87 38,0 38,7 NONKANUFACTURI NG 842.2 846.2 858.3 -0.5 -I .9 XX XX XX XX XX XX CONSTRUCTION 37.0 34.9 39.0 6.1 -5.2 555.371 531.18 15.01 15.22 37.0 34.9 Building Construction 10.7 10.3 10.4 4.1 2.9 542.44' 522.32 14.201 14.31 38.2 36.5 Highway & Heavy Construction 4.5 4.0 5.7 13.4 -21.0 52g.98) 425.73 13.73) 13.43 38.6 31.7 Special Trades Contracting 21.8 20.6 22.9 5.6 -4.9 565.33 553.47 15.66 15.95 36.1 34.7 TRANSPORTATION 37.2 40.3 42.5 -7.8 -12.6 236.15 246.96 9.93 9.80 26.5 25.2 Rat 1 rnads 6.7 6,7 8,1 0,0 -17,2 456,14 456,14 9,29 9,29 49,1 49,1 Trucking & garehoustng 14,0 13,9 14,8 0,3 -5,3 435,75 443,04 12,45 12,41 35,0 35,7 PUBLIC UTILITIES & COFg4. 20.5 20.5 21.1 -0.4 -2.9 438.01 440.31 11.26 11.29 38.9 39.0i i TRADE 267.4 266.4 273.2 0.4 -2.1 210.63 212.40 7.14 7.20 29.6 29.5l Retail Trade 194.2' 192.8 197.E 0.8 -1.7 170.98 170.72 6.38 6.37 26.8 26.8 General Merchandise Stores 32.7 32.4 ' 33.0: 0.9 -0.8 164.95 165.20 5.87 5.90 28.1 28.0 Food Stores 26,7 26.2 27,0 1.9 -1.0 238.57 232.40 8.46 8,30 28.2 28.0 Eating & Drinking Places 64,1 63,3 66,1 1,3 -3,1 90,54 89,89 4,46 4,45 20,3 20,2 Wholesale Trade 73,1 73,6 75,6 -0,6 -3,2 340,99 346,86 8,88 9,08 38,4 38,2 FINANCE, INS. & REAL ESTATE 73.1 73.0 · 73.1 0.3 0.0 268.63 267.91 7.38 7.34 36.4 36.5 Finance 30.8 30.9 30.3 -0.4 1.6 263.44 265.61 7.40 7.44 35.6 36.7 Insurance 29.2 29.1 29.4 0.5 -0.7 316.68 312.83 7.80 7.63 40.6 41.0 Real Estate 13.1 13.0 13.4 1.3 -2.0 185.08 183:08 6.19 6.27 29.9 29.2 SERVICE & HXSCELLANEOUS 249.7 251.5 245.8 -0.7 1.6 227.92 225.90 7.70 7.71 29.6 29.3 Business & Personal Services 60,9 60,6 59,9 0,5 1.7 493,20 498,08: 15,70 15,71 62,9 63,5 Repatr Se~tces 11,9 11,9 12,1 0,0 -1,8 268,23 256,13' 6,69 6,67 38.5 38.4 Medtcal Se~tces 74.1 73.8 72.1 0.5 2.8 204.68 204.33 7.31 7.35 28.0 27.8 Hospitals 32.2 32.3 31.9 -0.2 1.1 229.08 230.19 8.27 8.31 27.7 27.7 Nursing Homes 20.1 19.9 19.9 0.6 0.6 163.94 164.21 6.21 6.22 26.4 26.4 GOVERNHENT 157.4 159.7 163.6 -1.4 -3.8 Federal 18.2 18.2 18.5 0.0 -1.4 State 45.3 47.3 46.5 -4.2 -2.6 Local 93.8 94.2 98.6 -0.3 -4.8 ** Less than .05 l_/ Includes Scientific Instruments and Miscellaneous Menufacturtng 2_/ Average earnings data are on a "gross" basis and are derived from reports of payroll for full- and part-time production or nonsupervtsory workers. The payroll is reported before deductions of any kind. Bonuses, retro- active pay, tips, payment in kind, and 'fringe benefits" are excluded. Source: Current Employment Statistics Program (Figures rounded to nearest hundred) EMPLOYMENT AND EARNINGS CONDITIONS The total number Of nonagricultural wage and salary jobs in the Twin Cities metro- itan decreased in June. Developments in several industries played key roles in May to June job loss. First of all, there was the seasonal downturn in educa- tional services employment. This will also be a factor in the July figures when all local schools will have completed their year. Secondly, there was a major labor management dispute ih the airlines transportation industry which contributed to the downturn~ Finally, the continuing recession contributed to overall weaker than usual job market. The manufacturing sector managed to post some modest increases in both the durable and nondurable goods industries. Similarly, the construction in- dustry.added workers during prime building weather. Retail trade establishment add- ed workers at about the usual rate. As mentioned earlier, July employment estimates are expected to also show a drop in employment because of the seasonal loss of jobs in public and private educational services. However, several thousand teachers face permanent lay-off due to budget cuts. In addition, the number of Jobs in retail trade establishments typically drops during July. Partially offsetting these seasonal downturns will be higher employment in the transportation industry due to the settlement of the airlines labor-management dispute. The construction industry should show som~ modest growth in July. Manufacturing employment will probably continue to show a mixture of grow- th and loss, depending on the particular industry. CHARACTERISTICS OF PERSONS CLAIMING UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE Inumber of unemployment insurance imants decreased slightly from May to June, with a drop of 126. The de- crease of 0.5 percent reflects exactly the past five year average monthly change. Compared to June of 1981 claims are significantly higher, with an additional 8,615 claimants this year. The durable goods manufacturing. industries (especially machinery and metal products) and service industries alone accounted for over 66 percent of this yearly increase, with 3,673 and' 2,018 additional claims respectively. An atypical pattern developed this month as the number of claimants from white - collar occupations {54.9 per- cent of total) outnumbered those from blue - collar occupations (45.1 percent of total). This is probably due to the increase in service occupation claim- ants from teacher layoffs combined with a decrease in construction claimants. eliminary reports indicate next 's claimant count will probably increase slightly following the typical seasonal pattern. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INSURED UNEMPLOYED (Regular Benefits Program) MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL SMSA Week Ending 6/12/82 Percent Cham Industry and From: Percent 1~ Occupational Long-Term:' Attachment Unemployed Total, All Industries 25.4 Construction 27.0 Manufacturing 25.3 Durable Goods 22.8 Nondurable Goods 32.9 Trans., Coa~m., and 15.5 Public Utilities Wholesale Trade 27.5 Retail Trade 31.1 Fin., Ins., and 31.3 Real Estate Services 22.g Public Admin. 37.0 All Other 25.9 Inf. Nqt Available- 1.6 Total, All Occupations 25.4 Prof., Tech., Mgr. 23.2 Clerical 27.8 Sales 28.7 Service 19.5 Farm., For., Fish. 31.8 Processing 24.7 Machine Trades 27.1 Benchwork 23.g Structural Work 25.4 Miscellaneous 28.3 Inf. Not Available 30.6 NOTE: Percentages may not total to 100.0 due to independent rounding. l_/ Long-Term unemployed refers to unemployment insurance clal~nts whose current spell of unemployment has lasted 15 weeks or longer. THE JOB MARKET The results of the 1982 Minnesota Salary Survey by area are now.available. Once again, this year's survey collected actual rates of pay for persons working in 121 occupations. A.totai of 4000 establishments were surveyed in March of Which 2,468 or 61.7 percent responded. According to the survey results, salaries for professional, paraprofessional, and clerical occupations rose more rapidly than in recent years, ;lO.1 percent and 9.7 percent, respectively. In contrast, the increase in salaries for blue collar work- ers, 8...9 percent, was the lowest since 1977-78. The table below;cOmpares median wages in the Minneapolis-St. Paul SMSA for selected occupations. A coPY of the Salary Survey by area or the Survey of occupations in the hospital and nursing home industries by Minnesota Hospital Association district may be obtained at no charge by ~miting or calling the Twin Cities l_MI Center. MEDIAN HOURLY WAGES FOR SELECTED OCCUPATIONS MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL SMSA Percent Change Job Title 1982 1981 1980 - 1981 Typist (Clerk-Typist) $ $.0S $ 4.59 10.0 Clerk I 4.83 4.40 g.B Data Entry Operator ! 5.25 4.73 ll.O .. EDP Progran~er I 9.14 8.22 11.2 Systems Analyst I 11.68 lO.g6 6.6 Drafter I 7.43 6.81 g.1 El~trontcs Technician 8.87 8.27 7.3 Machine Operator 8.19 7.81 4.9 Assembler (excluding electronics assembler) 7.74 7.52 2.9 Welder 10.06 9.01 ll.7 Laborer 7~65 7.25 5.5 MINNESOTA DEPARTHENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY APPLICANT CHARACTERISTICS AND CONDITXOHS MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL SMSA June 1982 RATIO OF EXPERIENCED APPLICANTS OCCUPATIO~ EXPERIENCED APPLICANTS TO UNFILLED JOB OPENINGS % Change of 1981 1982 Total App. Total Fe~le Minority fr~ Month Ago June Sept. [otalm All Occupations 40,622 16,351 5,203 5.8 10.5 5.6* 12,6 8.7 10.2 8,9 Professional, Technical, Managerial 6,444 2,598 566 12.2 8.9 10.8 12.1 9.5 8.8 8.0 Clerical 7,481 5,915 764 6.5 9.5 9.2 8.6 7.4 6.6 6.1 Sales 1,818 688 108 2.1 4.0 3.3 4.3 2.0 2.8 2.9 Service .' 6,288 3,316 1,178 4.5 11.7 8.2 22.7 6.6 11.8 11.3 Farming, Forestry, Fishing 520 103 93 -13.8 2.1 0.4 118.0 48.8 50.3 4.9 Processing 785 191 120 4.5 12.0 g.8 11.9 11.7 9.4 9.1 Machine Trades 3,179 505 360 4.8 16.9 13.2 23.3 19.6 19.6 17.3 Benchwork 3,081 1,759 559 2.0 15.9 11.9 17.4 16,4 16.9 16.9 Structural 4,332 197 401 1.2 20.4 9.B i 24.4 24.4 22.5 20.1 ~otor Freight, Transportation 1,657 94 134 1.4 14.4 11.6 21.2 18.4 14.3 15.9 Packaging, Material Handling 4,721 '886 900 12.1 26.3 2.6* 14.1 12.5 12.S 10.6 Other 316 gg 20 2.9 26.6 6.4 14.7 15.9 10.2 14.4 Source: ESARS Table 96 Ratio is n~ch snmller than usual because of temporary State Fair openings tnc)uded in Packaging, Material Handling' category. : '- HINNKSOTA The Department of Energy, Planning and Development is again offering a fall conference devoted to downtown improvements. Presented by thc Planning Division's Office of Local Government, thc one-day conference has been developed especially for officials from Minnesota's small and medium-sized cities. ~f you are concerned about your downtown's future, bc sure to mark October 1 on your calendar and send in thc la, ration form below. While the conference is designed to appeal to city officials, planning cOmmission members, C~h"~mbers of Commerce, retailers, and downtown development groups, anyone with an interest in preserving and improving .doWntown should attend. · The theme of this year's conference is "A Balanced Approach to Small City Downtown Revitalization." Thc conference will include a presentation by Scott Gerloff, Deputy Director of thc National Main Street Center in Washington, DC. Additional sessions will focus on historic preservation, design, organization, promotion, marketing, traffic and parking, tax increment financing and other developmental aids. Registration Information Since sPace is limited, the accompanying registration form should be returned as soon as possible. Thc $15.00 fcc includes lunch, coffee breaks, and registration materials. The sign-in desk will be open at 8:00 a.m. and the opening session will begin at 9:00 a.m. on October I: Location The conference will again be held at the Ramada Inn, 1870 Old Hudson Road, St. Paul (near 1-94 at the White Bear Avenue exit). Anyone who wishes overnight accommodations should call the Ramada at (612) 735-2330 and ask for a reservation in the Main Street II block of rooms. Special government rates of $42.00 for a single or double room have been arranged. For more information on the conference, contact John Morse, Office of Local Government, 100 Hanover Building, 480 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55101, (612) 296-2532. Main Street: Minnesota II - October 1 REGISTRATION FORM Name Title ress Organization Phone City State Zip Enclosed is my check for $ made payable to the Government Training Service. Please mail to Main Street II Conference, Government Training Service, Suite 202, Minnesota Building, 46 East Fourth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. Phone (612) 222-7409. t~/~ HENN~PIN C0~ CENSUS BULLETIN of the & Development A-2,B08 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 612-348d~. 75 AGE AND SEX DISTRIBUTION ;2-02 AGE AND SEX' DISTRIBUTION Overview The age and sex distribution of a population can tell us a great deal about its dynamics. This distribution at a point in time is the direct result of the past interaction of three major demographic forces--births, deaths and migrations. Moreover, current age and sex characteristics are a major influence in deter- mining future population attributes and will have significant social and economic impact. It is, therefore, important that the policy planner as well as the student of demography examine the historical trend in the age and sex distribution. This bulletin analyzes the cur- rent distribution in light of past developments. An upcoming bulletin to be released in late 1982 will address anticipated future distribu- tions. _Age/Sex Pyramids A common demographic tool for displaying the .e and sex distribution of a population is the e/sex pyramid. An age/sex pyramid is con- strutted by computing the percentage of the total population lying in each age- and sex- specific category. The percentage of persons .in each category is then displayed on the left (males) and right (females) sides of a central axis. This construct typically forms the shape of a triangle or pyramid because of the rela- tive preponderance of younger age persons and the gradual reduction in their numbers as they approach old age. One would expect the pyramid to be approximately symmetrical about the central axis, since roughly equal numbers of males and females are born each year. Few age/sex pyramids precisely follow this idealized pattern. Variations especially occur for smaller geographic areas such as cities and counties. It is the variations that are of particular interest to demographers, since. these represent unusual population character- istics. Examination of the age/sex pyramids for' Hennepin County over the last twenty ears can reveal information about trends in deaths and migration. The most noticeable featUre of Hennepin County's age/sex pyramids from 1960 to 1980 is the aging of the "baby boom" generation-~' those people born between 1945 and 1960. This group of people (or "cohort'*) formed the broad base of the 1960 age/sex pyramid. The variation from the idealized pyramid was especially evident because of the relatively. small number of people born between 1930 and 1945. By 1970 the baby boom cohort had aged 10 years and the pyramid began to dip inward again at the base. This pattern is even more evident in the 1980 pyramid. The 1980 pyramid shows a major dip centered around age 10. This is a result of the low birthrates experienced in the late 1960's and early 1970's. The pre-baby boom dip so evident in the 1960 pyramid had all .but disappeared by 1980. Above the bulge of the baby boom the pyramid had become considerably leaner between 1960 and 1980. Different rates of attrition--death and out-migration--can account in part for these observations, but they are also artificial, resulting from the use of percentages on the horizontal axis. The large number of people born after World War II has, of necessity, reduced the percentage of the population in the older age categories. Although there was a noticeable increase in the number of elderly persons between 1960 and 1970 and a some- what smaller increase between 1970 and 1980, they continued to be a small percentage of the population. Less obvious, but still evident, is the asymmetry of the pyramids about the central axis. Above age 20 there is a consistent excess of femaIes over males which becomes quite evident among the elderly. The primary explanation for this result is the differential death rates for men and women. From birth onward, males have higher age specific death rates than females. The cumulative effect of the differential rates becomes evident by early adulthood and becomes more pronounced every year thereafter. This explains why there are more widows than widowers in the population. The number of males exceeds the number of females at the younger ages only because slightly more male babies are born than female. 1960 Age/Sex Pyramids 1970 One asymmetry o~f the 1960 and 1970 pyrami..ds. that has not been explained is the excess of young adult females, equivalent to approxi- mately 11,000 and 15,000 females, respect- ively, in the County's population. This cannot be attributed to differential d~rates in this age category and must have been the result of higher net migration of young women into Hennepir~ County. Although this irend is not evident in the 1980 pyramid, it-..may have been masked by the larger phenomenon of the aging of the baby boom generation. The reasons~ people move, particularly young adults, are both economic and social in nature. Post'high school migration often occurs because some people are seeking job opportunities or further education and others enter military service. Hennepin County is one of the centers for lobs and educational facilities in the Upper Mid- west..These opportunities appear to attract women in higher proportions than men. On the other hand, the military has traditionally attracted more men than women. Hennepin County has few military facilities. Individuals entering military service would, therefore, tend to leave the County. Furthermore, the United States was at war in Viet Nam in 1970 and military personnel levels were higher than the decades on either side of the 1970 census. Thus, the excess of females in Hennepin County in 1970 was due both to female in- migration and male out-migration. for Hennepin County · 10 O',S 1980 t.O ' O~S .The.' phenomenon of mig{-ation d~erv~s a closer look. Births and deaths, although sig- nificant factors in local population dynamics, have an impact that is both predictable and documentable. Migration, on the other hand is equally important at the local level, but is difficult to quantify or predict. Age/sex pyra- mids can be useful in assessing migration. By comparing the age 'structUre of the County's pop.ulation to the historic'al' birth, record, the cumulative .effect of attrition (death and out; migration) can be determined. If it-' were not for attrition, the "expected" Population* age structure would · be identical' '~to the'~ birth record for the County. By modifying .the age/sex Pyramids to reflect numbers' of people on the horizontal scale instead of the percen- tage of total popUlation, a diredt comparison between births and census population can be made. In 1960 the age/sex pyramid followed the birth record very closely up to approximately age 15. For the cohort of people 15 to 60,~the population exceeded the number of births. This indicates that there was a net migration into Hennepin County in this age group. There are several possible explanations for these observations. Perhaps the simplest them is that the in-migration evident in 19bu was primarily among childless adults and Population and Births for Hennepin County 1960 1970 Y[AA II)F IIrI~IAG~ i 1980 flight from Hennepin County occurred in the 1970's. young families. If so, the 1960 and 1970 age pyramids suggest that the people who came into Hennepin County prior to 1960 stayed here to raise their families. Out-migration of adults, on balance, would have been among more mature families with more children than the adults moving into Hennepin County. The 1980 picture was considerably different. A net out-migration of people occurred for all ages below 35 yeais, suggesting 'that families had left .Hennepin County. This has been a well-documented and much discussed phenom~ enon for Minneapolis, but it also appears to be true for the County as a whole. The age group 35 to 50 in 1980 apparently had zero net migration compared to the birth record. However, the 1960 pyramid reveals a major influx of people in that cohort (15-30 in 1960). The 1960 inflow evidently was offset y out-migration in the ensuing twenty years. 1970 pyramid continued to show net in- igration in this cohort (25-40 in 1970). Con- sequently it appears that most of the cohort's Demographically, Hennepin County appears to be at a crossroads. In the 1980's the large number of people 20 to 35' years of age--the "baby boom" generation--will be deciding where to settle down for their middle years. In the last twenty years this age group has experienced more out-migration than in- migration. What happens in the next decade will depend on the availability of housing, economic conditions and the quality of life in Hennepin CoUnty. Age Distribution of Municipal Populations Although the age/sex pyramids for Hennepin County provide a great deal of significant information on the changing population of the County, they are of limited value to municipal planners and decision makers. The age/sex distribution of the municipalities vary consid- erably. Local concerns will be influenced by these differences. To provide an indication of the variations and their relevance for local decision makers, nine age categories have been selected for discussion. Population 0-4 YearS' by Municipality Per~en~ Population Of To~al Total In Age Municipal Municipal Munictoaltty _ . Cateqory Ropulation Pooulatlon Bloomington 4,570 5.58 81,831 Brooklyn Center 2,020 6.47 31,230 Br~)oklyn Park 4,344 !0.02 43,33{ Chanmlin 1,045 11.60 9,006 Corcoran 502 11.81 4,252 Crystal 1,584 6.20 25,543 Dayton (part) 434 10.85 4,000 Deephaven 225 6.05 3,716 Eden Prairie 1,538 9.46 16,Z36 Edina 1,691 3.67 46,073 Excelsior 143 5.67 2,523 Fort Shelling 2 .gO 223 Golden Valley 1,052 4.62 22,775 Greenfield 129 9.27 1,391 Greenwood 42 6.43 653 Hanover (part) 26 10.48 2~8 Hassan Township 163 9.23 1,766 Hopkins 824 5.37 '15,336 Independegce .202 7.65 2,640 Long Lake 108 6.18" 1,747 Loretto 22 7.41 297 Maple Grove 2,446 11.92 20,526 Maple Plain 135 9.50 '1,421 Medicine Lake 24 5.73 419 Medina 206 7.85 2,623 Minneapolis 22,433 6.05 370,951 Minnetonka 2,440 6.31 38,683 Minnetonka Beach 28 4.87 575 Mlnnetrista 213 6~58 3,236 Mound 817 8.80 9,280 Ne~ Hope \ 1,527 6.61 23,087 Orono ~ 411 6.00 6,845 Osseo 216 7.26 2,974 Plymouth 2,343 7.41 31,615 Richfield 1,914 5.06 37,851 Robbinsdale 811 5.62 14,422 I~ockford (part) 4I 10.79 380 Rogers 54 8.28 652 St. Anthony (part) !84 3.27 5,619 St. 8onifacius 75 8.75 857 St. Louis Park 2,174 · 5.06 42,931 Shorewood 319 6.87 4,646 Spring Park 59 q.03 1,465 Tonka Bay 72 S.3Z 1,354 '~ayzata 13I 3.62 3,621 Woodland 30 5.70 526 Hennepin County Total 5~,769 6.35 941,403' · Column does not sum tO the actual census total for Hennepin (941,411) because Chanhassen has been om{tied from this table. % OF MINICIPAtlT¥ POPULAII~ 0-4 'YEARS OLD 8.80%- 11.91v · 6.45'~ - 6,75I [] 5.$7Z * 6. X)X [] O,OOl - 5.)11 [] 0 to 4 Years of A§e In 1980 the 'preschool population made up 6.4 percent, of Hennepin County's total population. This compared to 8.5 percent in 1970 and 12.0 percent in 1960. This dramatic percentage drop was a result of the real decline in births in conjunction with total population growth. Beach, Spring Park, Wayzata, Edina and St. Anthony. Fort Snelling (0.9) had the lowest percentage in the County. When this figure is compared to Maple Grove's 11.9 percent, it becomes quite apparent that these communi- ties have very different compositions. The northwest suburbs had the highest per- centage of preschoolers in their 1980 popu- lationS. Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Corcoran, Dayton, Hanover, Maple Grove and Rockford were the top cities in percentage of pre- schoolers. The cities with the smallest 'per- centages of preschoolers were Minnetonka NOTE: All maps in this bulletin were produced by computer at the Hennepin County Mapping and Planning System in Hopkins. Ail of the cities with a high proPOrtion of young children have been previously identified as high population growth areas within the County. The areas with low proportions of preschoolers--except for Fort Snelling, which is a special case--are the more establishe' and older suburbs. Population 5-13 Years by Municipality lunicioaltt¥ Bloomington . Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Champlin Corcoran Crystal Dayton {part)· Deephaven Eden Prairie [dina Excelsior Fort Shelling Golden Valley Greenfield Greenwood Hanover (part) Hassan Township Hopkins Independence Long Lake Loretto Maple Grove Maple Plain Medicine Lake Medina Minneapolis - Minnetonka ' Mtnnetonka 8each Minnetrista Mound New Hope Orono Osseo ' Plymouth . Richfield (part) St. Anthony (part) St. Bonifacius St. Louis Park Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Wayzata Woodland Population In Age Category 10,878 4,162 6,983 1,719 82O 3,217 -.811 .576 2,755 5,401 .' 231 8 '2,895' 281 · 84 61 404 1,333 486 250 34 3;9~ 216 -42 430 33,895 5,915 102 531 1,247 3,612 1,012 312 -5,325 3,916 1,.406 69 117 592 148 4,159 710 87 177 367 86 Percent Of Total Total Municipal ~unicipal Pooulation Population 13.29 81,831 13.33 31,230 16.12 43,332 19.09 9,006 19.29 4,252 12.$9 2~,543 20.27 4,000 15.50 3,716 16.94 16,236 11.72 46,073 9.16 2,523 3.69 223 · 12.7! 22,775 · 20.20 1,391 12.86 653 24L60 248 22.88 1,766 8.69 15,336 !8.41 2,640 14.31 1,747 11.45 297 19.00 20,525 15.20 1,421 10.02 419 16.39 2,623 9.14 370,951 15.29 , 38,683 17.74 575 16.41 3,236 13.44 9,280 15.65 23,087 14.78 6,845 10.49 2,974 16.84 31,615 10.35 37,851 9.75 14,422 18.16 380 17.94 652 10.54 5,619 17.27 857 9.69 42,931 15.28 4,646 5.94 1,465 13.07 1,354 10.14 3,621 16.35 526 Hennepin County Total 111,762 11.87 941,44)3' 'Column does not sum to the actual census total-for Hennepin (941,411) because Chanhassen has been omitted from this table. OF MUNICIPALII¥ POPULAIION S-15 YEARS OLD 1Z. 26~r - 24.59X m 14.~X ~ 16.~ ~ 10.49Z - 14.3lZ ~ O.~X- IO.~= ~ 5 to 13 Year Olds Children 5-13 years of age made up 11.9 percent of the County's total 1980 population. This 'compares'to 17.7 percent in both the 1960 and 1970 censuses. These children make up the elementary and junior high school popula- tions. The actual number of children in this age group decreased by about 57,,000 between 1970 and 1980. The results of this dramatic decli'ne have been reduced enrollments and reased pressures for school closings. The ldren in this age category are from the post-baby boom period. The municipalities with the largest proportion of children 5-13 years of age are the largely rural communitites: Dayton, Greenfield, Hanover and Hassan Township. All had more than 20 percent of their populations in this age group, with Hanover the highest at nearly 25 percent. The municipalities with less than 10 percent of their 1980 populations in this age group included: Excelsior~ Fort Shelling, Hopkins, Minneapolis, Robbinsdale, St. Louis Park and Spring Park. Fort Snelling had the lowest percentage (3.6) of elementary and junior high school-age children. PoPulation 14-17 Years by Municipality Percent Population Of Total Total In Age Municipal Municipal Municioality CateQory Population Population Bloomington 7,139 8.72 8!,831 BrooKlyn Center 2,694 8.63 31,230 Brooklyn Park 2,910 6.72 43,332 Chantolin 635 7.05 9,006 Corcoran 309 7.27 4,262 Crystal 2,055 8.05 25,543 Dayton (part) 324 8.10 4,000 Deephaven 342 9.20 3,716 Eden Prairie 1,170 7.19 16,236 Edina 3,713 8.06 46,073 Excelsior 111 4.40 Fort Shelling 6 2.69 223 Golden Valley 1,g18 8.42 22,7?$ Greenfield Z2g 9.27 .I,39I Greenwood 52 7.96 653 Hanover (part) 23 9.27 248 Hassan Township 188 10.65 1,766 Hopkins 752 4.90 15,336 Independence 273 10.34 2,640 Long Lake 165 9.44 1,747 Loretto 24 8.08 297 Maple Grove 1,374 6.6g 20,525 Maple Plain 81 5.70 1,421 Medicine Lake 35 8.36 Medina 260 9.91 2,6Z3 Minneapolis 17,697 4.77 370,g51 M!nnetonka 3,446 8.91 38,683 Minnetonka Beach 64 11.13 575 Minnetrista / 307 9.4g 3,236 Mound I 664 7.16 g,280 New Hope 2,154 9.33 23,087 Orono 627 9.16 6,845 Osseo 213 7.16 2,974 Plymouth 2,593 8.20 31,615 Richfield 2,506 6.62 37,861 Robbinsdale 811 5.62 14,422 Rockford (part) 34 8.95 380 Rogers 68 10.43 652 St. Anthony (par+.) 516 9.18 5,61g St. $onifacius 70 8.17 857 St. Louis ~ark 2,404 5.60 42,g31 Shorewood 446 9.58 4,646 'Spring Par~ 68 4.64 1,466 Tonka Bay 113 ' 8.36 !,364 Wayzata 257 7.10 3,621 Woodland 44 8.37 526 Hennepin County Total 61,784 6.56 941,403* 'Column does not sum to the actual census total for ~ennepin {341,4113 because Chanhassen has been omitted from this table. 14 to 17 Yea~ Olds This age group is the high school population. People in this age category are major users of public services (e.g., court services, family planning, public health). This group comprised '6.0, 7.5 and 6.6-percent respectively of the total population in the last three censuses. However, the number of people in this age group has dropped by about 10,000 since 1970. The result has been the closing ,of some area high. schools. There should be an even greater reduction in this group in the 1980's as the much smaller cohort following this one ages. Again, the more rural communities had the highest percentage of high school-age popula- OF UUNICIPALITY 'POPULAIION 14-1~ YEARS OLO - II. I. [] 6.?IZ - 8.10Z [] 0.00~ - 6,6~ [] tion in 1980. Hassan Township, Independence and Rogers all exceeded 10 percent. Minnetonka Beach, with 11.1 percent, had the highest percentage of its population in this age group. The lowest percentages were found in Excelsior, Fort Shelling (2.7 percent), · Minneapolis and Spring Park. When these three age groups (0-4, 5-13 and 14- 173 are combined, the 1980 eensus shows that the northwest suburban communities have the largest proportions of children--over 30 per- cent. Maple Grove, with 37 percent, has the highest percentage of any major city-(10,000 or more people) in the County. Fort Snelling has the lowest percentage (7.6) of children but is a very small community with a uni- ~. population. Spring Park, with 14.6 percent. ~ its total in this age group, is the lowest of the municipalities. Population 18-29 Years by Municipality Municipality Bloomington Brooklyn Canter Brooklyn Park Champlin Corcoran Crystal Dayton (part) Oeephaven Eden Prairie E~ina Excelsior Port Shelling Golden Valley Greenfield Greenwood Hanover (part) Hassan Township Hopkins Independence Long Lake toretto / Maple Grove Maple Plain Medicine Lake MeUina Minneapolis Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound New Hope Orono Osseo P1)qwuth Richfield Qbbinsdale ckford (part) 9ers St. Anthony (part) St. Bonifacius St. Louis Park Shorewood Spring Park -'Tonka Bay WayzaZa Woodland Percent Population Of Total Total In Age Municipal Municipal Category population population 18,460 · 22.56 81,831 7,268 23.27 31,230 12,725 29.37 43,332 2,150 23.87 9,006 941 22.13 4,252 5,824 22.80 2S,S43 803 20.07 =,CO0 498 13.40 3,716 3,362 20.67 15,236 6,683 14.51 46,073 748 29.65 2,523 40 17.94 223 4,143 18.19 22,775 237 17.04 1,391 117 17.92 653 37 14.92 248 269 15.23 1,766 4,778 31.16 15,336 415 15.72 2,640 380 21.75 1,747 68 22.90 297 4,547 22.15 20,525 301 21.18 1,421 101 24.11 ~19 530 20.21 2,623 113,428 30.58 370,951 6,381 i6.50 38,683 59 10.26 575 539 16.66 3,236 2,223 23.95 9,280 4,8§1 21.06 23,087 1~165 17.02 6,845 726 24.41 2,974 6,572 20.79 31,615 9,306 24.59 37,851 3,141 21.78 14,422 109 28.68 380 174 26.69 652 1,022 18.19 5,619 184 21.47 857 10,621 24.74 42,931 777 16.72 4,646 474 32.35 1,465 267 19.72 1,354 786 21.71 3,62! 64 12.17 526 Hennepin County Total 238,304 'Column'does not 'sum to the (941,411) because Chanhassen has 25.31 941,403' actual census total for Hennepin been omitted from this table. 18 to 29 Year Olds These ages are ones of major transition for most people. Education is completed and decisions about employment and housing arrangements are made. Several changes of residence can be expected before a more permanent choice is made. The significance of these life choices should be obvious. People who emerge from this age category still living: in Hennepin County are likely to remain here for .the next 20 to 30 years. 'Furthermore, sinc'e people 18 to 29 are in their primary child ~.aring period, the future number of families, the primary social structure, will larely be determined by the number of people in this age group who remain in Hennepin County. ~ OF ~NICIPALII¥ PO~UtAIlO~ 18-~ YEARS OLD ,,.,, - ,2.,,, m 21. 18~' - 2&.87~ ~ l?.OlZ - ?I.05Z ~ O.~X - ~6.?2X ~ In Hennepin County, 25.3 percent of the popu- lation fell in the 18 to 29 age category in 1980. Comparable figures for 1960 and 1970 were 16.1 percent and 21.2 percent. Since 1960, the population in this age group has increased by about 103,000. This remarkable increase was due to the aging of the post-war baby boom population. Cities with the highest percentages in this age .category are a disparate group that includes newer,' faster growing suburbs, rural communi- ties and well-established older cities. Brooklyn Park, Excelsior, Hopkins, Minneapolis, Rockford, Rogers and Spring Park (32.3 percent) all had over 26 percent of their total population in this age category. None of the County's communities' h.ad less than 10 percent of their population in this group. Deepl~aven, Edina, Hanover, Minnetonka Beach (10.3 percent) and Woodland had 15 percent or less. If the municipalities with high propor- tions of young adults can continue to attract these people and they retain them as they age, they will be likely to grow in the next decade. PoPUlation 30-,44 Municipality Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Champlin Corcoran Crystal Dayton (part) Oeephaven Eden Prairie Edtna Excelsior Fort Shelling Golden Valley Greenfield Greenwood Hanover (part) Hassan Township Hopkins Independence .. Long Lake Loretto Maple Grove Maple Plain Med4cine Lake Medina Minneapolis ? Minnetonka: · Minnetonka Beach. Minnetrista ..~ ~: Mound . .:: New Hope Orono Oss~ Plymouth Richfield Robbinsdale Rockford (part) Rogers St. Anthony {part) St. 8ontfacius St. Louis Park Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Wayzatm Woodland ~ennepin County Total -Column does not sum to the (941,41!) because Chanhassen has Percent Population Of Total Total In Age Municipal ~unicipal Category Pooulatlon Peculation 18,362 22.44 81,831 5,895. 18.88 31,230 10,418 24.04 43,332 2,262 25.12 9,006 1;091 25.66 4,252 5,091 19.93 25,543 1,001 '25.02 4,000 924 24.87 3,716 4,911 30.20 !6,236 8,856 19.22 46,073 443 17.56 2,$23 40 17.94 223 4,682 20.56 22,775 351 25.23 1,391 163 24.96 653 59 23.79 248 449 25.42 1,766 · 2,592 16.30 15,336 .636 24.09 2,640 379 21.69 1,747 47 !5.82 297 6,095 29.70 20,525 306 21.53 1,421 82 .19.57 419 599 · 22.84 .. 2,623 :65,073 17.54" 370,951 9,705 25.09 38,683 ,., 150 26.09 575 836 25.83 3,236 2,213 23.85 9,280 5,140 22.26 23,087 1,646 24.05 6,845 ' '- 422 14.19 2,974 8,761 27.71 31,615 6,962 18.39 37,851 2,239 15.52 14,422 77 20.26 380 129 19.79 652 835 14.86 5,619 171 19.95 857 8,117 18.91 42,~31 1,153 24.82 4,646 245 16.72 1,~65 313 23.12 1,354 684 18.89 3,621 120 22.81 526 190,725 20.26 941,403' actual census total fop Hennepin' been omitted from this table. Years'by Municipality OF MUNICIPALITY POPULATIO~ ~0-44 YEARS OLD .... - .. ,. [] 22. ~6I - 24.86I I 18.871 - 21.6S~ [] 0.00~ - i8.59~ [] 30 to 44 Year Olds The population in early middle ages has generally achieved a stable employment and housing arrangement. Frequently, these people'have young or teenage children and have established a relatively consistent life style. In 1980, 20.3 percent of the County's population was 30 to 44 years of age, eom- pared to 19.6 percent in 1960 and 16.6 in 1970. The percentage of the population included in this category began to increase in the late 1970's as the post-war generation began to age. The size and proportion of the population in the 30 to 44 age group should continue to increase into the early 1990's. Municipalities with a large pereentage of their population in this age category also have rela- tively large populations of children. Those with more than 25 percent in this age group are: Champlin, Corcoran, Dayton, Eden. P~airie (30.2 percent), Greenfield, Hassan Township, Maple Grove, Minnetonka Beach and Plymouth. Cities with the lowest proportions of 30-44 year-olds were: Loretto, Osseo (14.2 percent), Robbinsdale and St. Anthony. This age group consists of a large number of first home buyer's and it is not surprising that a correlation exists between real estate avail- ability and cost and the residence of thl ~-oup. Population 45-"59 Years by MuniciPality. Munt ci Da 1 i ty Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Champl i n Corcoran Crystal Dayton (part) Deephaven Eden Prairie Edina \ Excel sibr~ Fort Snel l~ng Golden Valley Greenfield Greern~ood Hanover (part) Hassan Township HoDkins Independence Long Lake Loretto Maple Grove Maple Plain Medicine Lake Medina Mi nneapol i s Hi nnetonka Mt nnetonka Beach Mi nnetri sta Mound New Hope Orono Osseo Plymmuth Ri chfi el d binsdale kford (part) e~ St. Anthony (part) St. Boni factus St. Louis Park Spring Park Tonka Bay Wayzat~ '~oodl and Henneptn County Total Percent Population Of Total Total In Age Municipal Municipal Category Population Pooulation 15,206 . 18.58 81,831 S,958 19.08 31,23~ 4,224 9.75 43,332 778 8.64 9,006 368 8.65 4,252 4,857 ' 19.01 25,543 '' 414 ' :-10.35 4,000 708 :{9.05 3,716 1,860 11.44 16,236 10,311 22.38 46,073 351 13.91 2,523 67 30.04 223 4,847 21.28 22,775 149 10.71 1,39! 101 15.47 653 22 8.87 2~ 174 9.85 1,766 2,093 13.65 15,336 .393 14.89 2,640 274 15.68 1,747 56 18.86 . 297 1,596 7.78 ZO,S2S 146 10.27 1,421 76 18.14 419 399 15.21 2,623 44,799 12.08 370,951 ' .6,951 17.97 38,683 105 18.26 575 512 15.82 3,236 1,172 12.63 9,280 '3,451 14.95 23,087 '.' ~,177 17.20 6,845 458 15.40 Z,974 4,271 13.51 31,615 7,012 18.53 37,851 2,579 17.88 14,422 34 8.95 380 74 11.35 652 1,A97 26.64 5,619 102 11.90 857 7,140 16.63 42,931 817 17.59 4,64~ 177 12.08 1,465 247 18.24 1,354 611 16.87 3,621 Il0 20.91 526 138,724 14.74 941,403' *Column odes not sum to the actual census total for Hennepin (941,411) because Chanhassen has been omitted from thfs table. 45 to 59 Year Olds People born between the First and Second World Wars are now in their late middle ages. This age group has remained remarkably stable as a proportion of the total population over the last 20 years--15.3 percent in 1960, 15.0 percent in 1970, and 14.7 percent in 1980. The number of people in the 45 to 59 cohort migrating into the County has compensated the low level of births in the 1920's and As a result, both the number of people and the percentage of the total population in this cohort have remained relatively constant. OF MUNICIPALII¥ POFULAIlOW 45-5g GARS OLD 18.262 - 50.04% I5.402 - 18.242 0.002- ID. ri2 Many of the people in this age group have children who are in their teens or are grown. Cities with large populations of young children - have relatively few people in the 45 to 59 age group. The northwest's developing suburbs as a group have low proportions of people in late middle age. Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Corcoran, Hanover, Hassan Township, Maple Grove (7.8 percent) and Rockford all have less than 10 percent of their population in this age category. The inner ring suburbs and Minneapolis tend to be higher than average on a percentage bagis. Edina, Golden Valley, St. Anthony and Woodland have more than 20 percent of their populations in the 45 to 59 category. The Fort Shelling area, with 30.0 percent, had the highest percentage in the County. Population 60-64 Years by Municipality Percent Population Of Total Total In Age Municipal Municipal Muntcioal!ty CateGory Pooulation Pooulation Bloomington 2,627 3.21 81,831 Brooklyn Center !,271 4.07 31,230 Brooklyn Park 683 1.58 43,332 Chamolin 126 1.40 9,006 Corcoran ' 73 1.72 4,252 Crystal 1,135 4.44 25,543 Oay:on (part) 63 1.57 4,000 Deepnaven 151 4.06 3,716 Eden Prairie 306 1.88 16,236 Edina .. 2,727 5.92 46,073 Excelsior 120 4.76 2,523 Fort Snelling 31 13.90 223 Golden Valley 1,120 4.92 22,775 Greenfield 40 2.88 1,391 Greenwood 43 6.58 653 Hanover (part) .~. 7 2.82 248 Hassan Township 41 2~32 1,766 Hopkins 700 4.56 15,336 Independence 68 2.58 2,540 Long Lake '* 38 2.18 1,747 Loretto 4 1.35 297 M~ple Grove 226 1.10 '20,525 Maple Plain S6 3.94 1,421 ~edicine Lake 23 5.49 419 Medina 54 2.06 2,623 Minneapolis 16,596 4.47 370,951 Minnetonka 1,409 3.64 38,683 Minnetonka Beach 23 4.00 575 Minnetrista 113 3.49 3,236 Mound . 262 2.82 9,280 New Hope 569 2.46 23,087 Orono 279 4.08 6,845 Osseo 128 4.30 2,974 Plymouth 686 2.17 31,615 Richfield 2,269 5.99 37,851 Robbinsdale 962 6.67 14,422 Rockford (part) 5 1.32 380 Rogers 11 1.69 652 St. Anthony (par'.) .378 6.73 5,619 St. 5onifacius 23 2.68 857 St. Louis Park 2,351 5.48 42,931 Shorewood 149 3.21 4,646 Spring Park 55 3.75 1,465 Tonka Bay 64 4.73 1,354 ~ayzata 179 4.94 3,621 Woodland 31 5.89 526 Hennepin County Total 38,275 4.07 941,403' OF MUNICIPALITY P(X~ULATIO~ 60-64 YEARS OLD ..z.- I,.,, [] 3.64x. 4.~1 [] Z. 16)[ - $. 49~ [] 0.00~ - 2.05~ [] *Column does not sum to the actual census total for Hennepi:n (941,411) because Chanhassen has been omitted from this table. 60 to 64 Year Olds This age group, although small in absolute numbers in 1980, is the group who will be retiring within just a few years. As such, they are in a transition stage both personally and from a public policy standpoint. By 1990, most will have begun receiving Social Security and perhaps other forms of financial and social assistance. The size of this group will be an important consideration in determining ser- vices to be provided during the 1980's. The number and percentage of people in this age category have- changed little in twenty years--4.2 percent in 1960, 3.8 percent in 1970 and 4.1 percent in 1980. There is no reason to expect major increases in this group until the 21st century. Although most ..municipaLities have less than five percent of their population in the 60 to 64 category, several have substantially more. They are generally clustered in two areas: the inner-ring suburbs (including Edina, Richfield, Robbinsdale, St. Anthony and St. Louis Park) and the Lake Minnetonka area (especially Greenwood and Woodland). Medicine Lake and Fort Shelling (with a high of 13.9 percent) also have large numbers of people in this age category relative to their populations. In' contrast, many municipalities are under two percent with the lowest being ChampliP Loretto, Maple Grove (1.1 percent) ar. Rockford. Population 65-74 Years by MuniCipality Municipality Bloomington Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park Champlin Corcoran Crystal Dayton (part) Deephaven Eden Prairie E~ina ' Ex~elsior For~Snelling Golden Valley Greenfield Greenwood Hanover (par~) Hassa~ Township Hopkins Independence Long Lake Loretto Maple Grove Maple Plain' Medicine Lake Medina Minneapolis · Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Mound New Hope OronO Osseo Plymouth Richfield oObbinsda)e ckford (part) gers St. Anthony (part) St. 8onifacius St. Louis Park 5horewood Soring Park · Tonka Bay Wayza~ca Woodland Percent Population Of Total Total In Age Municipal Municipal Category Pooulation Population 2,653 3.24 81,831 1,295 4.15 31,230 741 1.71 43,332 189 2.10 9,006 84 1.98 4,252 1,167 4.57 25,543 109 2.72 4,000 171 4.60 3,716 231 1.42 16,236 3,825 8.30 46,073 179 7.09 2,523 14 6.28 223 1,223 5.37 22,775 42 3.02 i,391 26 3.98 653 8 3.23 248 55 3.11 1,766 1,242 8.10 15,336 .105 3.98 2,640 .. 83 4.75 1,747 '23 7.74 297 234 1.14 20,525 68 4.79 1,421 25 5.97 419 79 3.01 2,623 29,469 7.94 370,951 1,503 3.89 38,683 33 5.74 575 129 3.99 3,236 426 4.59 9,280 .691 2.99 23,087 330 4.82 6,845 204 6.86 2,974 744 2.35 31,615 2,545 6.72 37,851 1,491 10.34 14,422 5 1.32 380 14 2.15 652 428 7.62 5,619 37 4.32 857 3,476 8.10 ~2,931 188 4.05 4,646 131 8.94 1,465 65 4.80 1,354 345 9.53 3,621 24 4.56 526 Hennepin County Total 56,150 5.96 941,403' 'Column does not sum tO the actual census total for Hennepin (941,411) because Chanhassen has been omitted from this table. Z OF ~dNICIPALIIY POPULATION 65-74 '/EARS OLD 5.'" - ,o.,,, [] 4.56:~ - 6.2T% t ~rOI2 - 4.51% ~ 65 to 74 Year Olds The people in this age group are among the most intensive users of public services including: Social Security, financial assist- ance, social services and particularly medical and nursing care. Hennepin County has seen little change in the number of seniors in this category. Their percentage of the total population has dropped from 6.5 percent in 1960 to 5.7 percent in 1970 and 6.0 percent in 1980. Some increase the size of this population can be expected the next ten years with a leveling off or slight decline likely in the 1990's. The highest percentages of the 65 to 74 age group were in the central core of cities (Edina, Minneapolis, Robbinsdale, 10.3 percent and St. Louis Park) where services and housing are more readily available for elderly residents. Spring Park and Wayzata also have over 8 percent of their populations in this age cate- gory. The fast growing suburbs (Brooklyn Park, Corcoran, Eden Prairie, Maple Grove,' 1.1 percent and Rockford) have less than 2 percent of their population' in this age group. Population 75 Years and Over by Municipality Percent Pooulation Of Total Total In Age Municipal Municipal Municioal!ty Category Population PoPulation Bloomington 1,936 2.37 81,831 Brooklyn Center 667 2.14 31,230 Brocklyn Perk 304 .70 43,332 Chamolin " 102 1.13 9,006 Corcoren 64 1.51 4,252 Crystal 612 2.40 25,543 Dayton (part) 41 1.02 4,000 Deephaven 121 3.26 3,716 Eden Prairie o. 130 .80 16,236 Edina 2,B65 6.22 46,073 Excelsior 197 7.81 2,523 Fort Shelling 15 6.73 223 Golden Valley 895 3.93 22,775 Greenfield 33 2.37 1,391 Greenwood .. 25 3.83 6~3 Hanover (part) 5 2.02 248 Hassan Township 23 1.30 1,766 Hpokins 1,022 6.66 15,336 Independence '. 62 2.35 2,640 LonpLake 70 4.01 1,747 Lore~to 19 6.40 297 Maple Grove 107 .52 20,B2B Maple Plain 112 7.88 1,421 Medicine Lake 11 2.63 419 Medina 66 2.52 2,623 Minneapolis 27,561 7.43 370,951 Minnetonka 933 2.41 38,6~3 Minnetonka Beach 11 1.91 575 Mtnnetrista 56 1.73 3,236 ~ound 256 2.76 9,280 New Hope 1,082 4.69 23,087 Orono 198 2.89 6,345 Osseo 295 9.92 2,974 Plymouth 320 1.01 31,615 Richfield 1,421 3,75 37,851 Robbinsdale 982 6.81 14,422 Rockford (part) 6 1.58 380 Rogers 11 1.69 652 St. Anthony (part) 167 2.97 5,619 St. Bonifacius 47 5.48 857 St. Louis Park 2,489 5.80 42,931 Shorewood 88 1.89 4,646 Spring Park 169 11.54 1,465 Tonka Bay 36 2.66 !,354 Wayzata 261 7.21 3,621 ~oodland 17 3.23 526 Henneoin County Total 45,910 4.88 941,403' *Column oPes not sum to the actual census total for Henneoin (941,4117 because Chanhassen has been omitted from this table. 75 Years and Over The population in this age group has grown remarkably in size in the last 20 years. Al- though, they comprised a fairly small number and percentage of the total population in 1980--46,000 people or 4:9 percent--their numbers have grown by 71 percent since 1960. At that time, they were about 27,000 in num- ber (3.1 percent of the 1960 population). This increase is undoubtedly a result of advances in medical care and the better general health of the population. This age group is the primary user of nursing home care. As their numbers continue to increase in the 1980's, an even greater need for nursing home care or alterna- tives will be evident. mi m .OF MUNICIPALITY POPULATIO~ OVER 74 YEARS OLD 5.7'9~, . 11.5%'Z [] 2.65'~ - 5. 48~ [] I. ?~,:~ - 2. 62% [] 0.00~ - 1.68:~ [] Although most municipalities have less than five percent of their population in the over 75 group, several have seven percent or more, including: Excelsior,' Maple Plain, Minneapolis, Osseo, Spring Park (11.5 percent) and Wayzata. When all senior age groups were taken together (60 years and over), munici- palities with 20 percent or more include: Edina, Fort Shelling (26.9 percent), Osseo, Robbinsdale, Spring Park and Wayzata. For the County, 14.9 percent of the population was 60 years or older. The cities with the smallest proportions of persOns 75 and over were: Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Dayton, Eden Prairie, Hassen Town- ship, Maple Grove (0.5 percent) and Plymouth. Again, these were the fast growing suburbs.' Considering all seniors, municipalities with the lowest proportion of persons over 60 years of age were: Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Ed Prairie, Maple Grove (2.8 percent) ano Rockford. McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I LAND SURVEYORS [] PLANNERS August 23, 1982 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Mr. J0n Elam City of Mound 5341 Maywogd Road Mound, MN 55364 Subject: Mound, Minnesota Peabody Road Storm Sewer Extension File #6510 Dear Jon: Enclosed are two copies of the plans for the above project. We have also received two bids for the proposed work, of which both were below our original estimate of $10,515.00. The following are the two'bids. Widmer Bros., Inc., Spring Park F.F. Jedlicki, Eden Prairie $9,335.00 $9,865.00 We would.recommend the City accept the low bid of $9,335.00 from Widmer Bros. and enter into a contract for t~is project. If you need any additional information, please contact me. Very truly yours,' McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Jo~~hn Came ro n JC:sj Enclosure Minneapolis- Hutchinson - Alexandria- Eagan printed on recycled paper PROPOSAL Mound, Minnesota' · Peabody Road Storm ~ewer. File #6510 Item Quantlt~ 2i." ReP ' 'S~orm Sewer Manhole Catch Basin Manh01e'.l~ith 3' Sump 287 L.F. 1 EACH 1 EACH 'RelOcate Existing 2i" Concrete Apron Rip Rap' 5 ¢.¥. 'Tree Removal : 6 EACH 4" Black Dirt & Seed 340 S.Y. Unit Price L~P S~ ...iGranular Material 30 TON ~ /~/T~ t TOTAL - Total (Indivldual; Partnership; Corporation) PROPOSAL . Mound, Minnesota Peabody Road Storm Sewer File #6510 ~uaotity Unit Price To~a~l 21? ~CP Storm Sewer Manhole Catch Basin Manhole With 3' Sump Relocate Existing 21" Concrete Apron Rip Rap Tree Removal 4" Black Dirt & Seed Granular Material