The URL can be used to link to this page

2021-11-23 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, L quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 1. Opening meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2021 - 7:00 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature, have been evaluated by staff, recommended by staff for approval by the Council, and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. At this time, anyone present who wishes to offer dissenting comment to any items on the Consent Agenda is invited to identify themselves and the item of concern so that the it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered after discussion in normal sequence. Separate introduction or further support from petitioners or requestors is not required at this time and removal of an item from the Consent Agenda for this purpose is not required or appropriate. 4. *Consent Agenda Page *A. Approve payment of claims 2626-2649 *B. Approve minutes: November 9, 2021 Regular Meeting 2650-2656 *C Approve Resolution approving public lands permit to modify structure on 2657-2667 Devon Commons adjacent to 4717 Island View Drive and to authorize 2660 improvements as provided by City Code Sec. 129-35 (b) (5) related to non -conforming uses *D Approve Resolution approving contract amendment with MnSpect for 2668-2671 Inspection Services 2671 *E Approve Resolution approving request from Egyptian Parrots Pet Store for 2672-2693 substantial use determination for tenant space in the Commerce Place Shopping 2674 Center located at 2200-2238 Commerce Boulevard (Planning Case No. 21-17) *F Approve final, closeout pay request in the amount of $6,212.95 to Kusske Const. 2694-2705 For the 2019 Street and Utility Improvement Project (Sherwood), PW 19-01 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Planning Case No. 21-16 Public Hearing - proposed amendments to City Code Chapter 129 (Zoning Ordinance) 2706-2722 related to rezoning of properties at 5084 and 5098 Three Points Boulevard from B-2 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. neighborhood business to mixed use; also consideration and action on proposed comprehensive plan amendment to reguide properties at 5084 and 5098 Three Points Boulevard from residential to mixed use Requested Actions A. Approve Ordinance Amending the City of Mound Official Zoning Map to Change 2712 the Zoning District for 5084 Three Points Boulevard and 5098 Three Points Boulevard from B-3 Neighborhood Business District to MU-C Mixed Use -Corridor District B. Approve Resolution Approving Amendment to 2040 Comprehensive Plan to 2713 reguide properties at 5084 and 5098 Three Points Boulevard from medium density residential to mixed use and authorizing submittal of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council 7. Planning Case No. 21-11 2723-2728 Public Hearing —proposed amendment to Code Chapter 42 (Nuisances) related to lighting and glare Requested Actions A. Approve Ordinance Amending Chapter 42 (Nuisances) of the Mound City 2727 Code Regarding Public Nuisances Affecting Peace and Safety 8. Discussion/consideration on request from property owners at 5395 Baywood Shores to 2729-2732 name channel/public water in subdivision of "Replat of Harrisons Shore" 2730 9. Property owner at 2396 Commerce Blvd requesting discussion and approval of the First 2733-2774 Amendment to the Restoration Agreement for 2396 Commerce Blvd 10. City Engineer Brian Simmons providing presentation of 2022 Public Works Project 2775-2801 Feasibility Reports and action to approve Resolutions accepting studies and ordering plans and specifications for: A. 2021 Lynwood Watermain Replacement (Ph2) PW 22-01 2779 B. 2021 Lift Station Replacement Project PW 22-03 2794 11. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/Reports from Council members B. Reports: Fire Department— October 2021 2802-2804 C. Minutes: Parks and Open Spaces Commission 06-10-21 2805-2807 Parks and Open Spaces Commission 08-10-21 2808-2810 Planning Commission 10-05-21 2811-2819 D. Correspondence: MSP Business Journal Nov 2021 Article on Munis 2820-2821 12. Adjourn COUNCIL BRIEFING November 23, 2021 Council has resumed regular meetings in the City Council Chambers in the Centennial Building. Council meetings are held the second and fourth Tuesday each month at 7:00 PM with agendas and meeting details/locations posted to the City website the Thursday prior under the "Mayor and Council' section of the "Government" tab of the Home Page. Government I Mound, MN (cityofmound.com) Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! November 23 — 6:55 PM — HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) November 23 — 7:00 PM — City Council Regular Meeting * * * At City Council Chambers, Centennial Building December 14 — 6:30 PM — Council Photo December 14 — 6:55 PM — HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) December 14 — 7:00 PM — City Council Regular Meeting * * * At City Council Chambers, Centennial Building 2022 Meetings January 11 and 25 February 8 and 22 Events and Activities: Subscribe to RAVE messaging tool for emergency notifications and updates RAVE Emergency Notifications I Mound, MN (cityofmound.com) City Offices: City offices closed November 25 and 26 in observation of Thanksgiving City offices closed December 23 and 24 in observation of Christmas City offices closed December 30 and 31 in observation of New Years City Official's Absences Please notify the City Manager in advance of an absence. Inauire in advance. please...... Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more research may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision - making. 2021 City of Mound Claims 11-23-21 YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT 2021 0921KENGRAV $ 5,139.00 2021 1021HOISINGT $ 4,967.92 2021 110921PAYREQ $ 138,065.07 2021 ELANCC102521 $ 6,235.44 2021 112321CITY $ 53,182.82 2021 112321HWS $ 102,879.13 TOTAL CLAIMS 11 $ 310,469.38 CITY OF MOUND 11A8/218:59AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: November 2021 Payments Batch 0921KENGRAV $5,139.00 Refer 242 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN _ Cash Payment G 101-23452 LMCIT 2018 WESTEDGE AS Comments $544.00 LMCIT 2018 WESTEDGE STREET PROJ- PW 18-01 ASSESSMENT OBJECTION SUPPORT -- LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2021 Invoice 163855 10202021 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2021 $80.00 Invoice 163855 10202021 Cash Payment G 101-234404848/4852 LANARK ABATE 4848/4852 LANARK RD ENFORCEMENT $630.00 MATTER -LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2021 Invoice 163855 10202021 Cash Payment G 101-23454 2396 COMMERCE BLVD HA 2396 COMMERCE BLVD HAZARDOUS BLDG $444.00 MATTER -LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2021 Invoice 163855 10202021 Cash Payment G 101-23453 5872 GLENWOOD ABATE 5872 GLENWOOD RD HAZARDOUS BLDG $37.00 ABATEMENT -LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2021 Invoice 163855 10202021 Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional Srvs MOUND HARBOR DISTRICT REAL ESTATE $3,220.50 PURCHASE & DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2021 Invoice 163855 10202021 Cash Payment E 101-41600-316 Legal P & I PLANNING LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2021 $128.00 Invoice 163855 10202021 Cash Payment G 101-23455 3053 BRIGHTON BLVD ABA 3053 BRIGHTON BLVD- ABATEMENT - $55.50 HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATTER- MISC PLANNING SVCS SEPT 2021 Invoice 163855 10202021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,139.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $1,918.50 475 TIF 1-3 Mound Harbor Renaissan $3,220.50 $5,139.00 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated bythe Computer $5,139.00 Total $5,139.00 OEM Payments Batch 1021HOISINGT CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 $4,967.92 Refer 239 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, 1 _ Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL MISC PLANNING SVCS OCTOBER 2021- Invoice 020-002-21 11/112021 Cash Payment G 101-23463 VIP -INLAND DEV PRT 125% VILLIAGES OF ISLAND PARK PLANNING SVCS OCTOBER 2021- Invoice 020-002-21 11/112021 Cash Payment G 101-23462 PC-21-15 4379 WILSHIRE P 4379 WILSHIRE BLVD- LAKEWINDS PARKING LOT- MISC PLANNING SVCS OCTOBER 2021- Invoice 020-002-21 11/112021 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs ZONING/SUBDIVISION CODE UPDATES MISC PLANNING SVCS OCTOBER 2021 Invoice 020-002-21 11/112021 Cash Payment G 101-23468 4843 MANCHESTER ISLAN 4843 MANCHESTER ISLAND PARK CUP- MISC PLANNING SVCS OCTOBER 2021 Invoice 020-002-21 11/112021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $4,967.92 $4,967.92 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $4,967.92 Total $4,967.92 Total 11/17/21 2:53 PM Page 1 $1,320.00 $37.50 $187.50 $3,310.42 $112.50 $4,967.92 02001i] Payments Batch 110921 PAYREQ CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 $138,065.07 Refer 3 AAA STRIPING SERVICE CO. _ Cash Payment E 427-43121-440 Other Contractual Servic MISC PAY REQUEST #1 2021 SEAL COAT PROJECT PW 21-07 - EPDXY STRIPING Invoice 110921 11/92021 Project PW2107 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 6 ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 427-43121-440 Other Contractual Servic PAY REQUEST #2 & FINAL- 2021 SEAL COAT PROJECT- PW 21-07 WORK COMPLETED JULY 30 THRU NOV 2, 2021 Invoice 110921 11/92021 Project PW2107 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 2 DERAU CONSTRUCTION, LLC _ Cash Payment E 404-43100-500 Capital Outlay FA 2021 ENTRANCE MONUMENT PROJ - PAY REQ #2 PW 21-13- WORK DONE JULY 30 THRU OCTOBER 15, 2021 Invoice 110921 11/92021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Refer 5 FLOORCOAT MIDWEST, LLC Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 110921 11/92021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Refer 4 R & R EXCAVATING, INC. Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 110921 11/92021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo Project PW2113 10100 Total PAY REQUEST #1 2021 MANHOLE REHAB PROJ PW 21-04- WORK COMPLETED OCT 4TH THRU OCTOBER 30TH, 2021 Project PW2104 Wells Fargo 10100 Total PAY REQUEST #2 2021 B-2 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 21-03- WORK COMPLETED SEPT 22 THRU OCT 30, 2021 Project PW2103 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 404 COMMUNITY INVESTMENT RESERVE $33,012.50 427 STREET MAINTENANCE $34,346.43 602 SEWER FUND $70,706.14 $138,065.07 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated bythe Computer $138,065.07 Total $138,065.07 11/17/21 10:01 AM Page 1 $17,268.58 $17,268.58 $17,077.85 $17,077.85 $33,012.50 $33,012.50 $49,951.00 $49,951.00 $20,755.14 $20,755.14 020�. Payments Batch ELANCC102521 Refer 2 ELAN CREDIT CARD CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: October 2021 $6,235.44 Cash Payment R 101-41000-36240 Refunds and Reimbur AICPA DUES- 25%OF ANNUAL DUES REIMBURSED BY C. PAUSCHE- RECPT #69250 9/14/21 Invoice 102521 9212021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training Invoice 102521 9/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies THE SUITES HOTEL DULUTH- LODGING AMERICAN WATERWORKS ASSOC MN CONFERENCE 9-14 TO 9-17-21 R. PRICH & M.TESSEN DELANO TRUE VALUE GALLON HAND SOAP- HWS Invoice 102521 9282021 Cash Payment E 101-41920-440 Other Contractual Servic ZOOM.US- MONTHLY CHARGE TO RECORD COUNCIL MEETINGS TO CLOUD FOR LMCC Invoice 102521 9/302021 Cash Payment E 101-41500-433 Dues and Subscriptions 75%CITY PAID-AICPA DUES- 25%OF ANNUAL DUES REIMBURSED BY C. PAUSCHE- RECPT#69250 9/1421 Invoice 102521 9212021 Cash Payment E 101-41310-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 102521 9212021 Cash Payment E 101-41310-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 102521 9212021 Cash Payment E 101-41310-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 102521 9212021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-434 Conference & Training Invoice 102521 9212021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies MACKENTHUNS MEATS- BRATS & BURGERS- PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION LUNCH 9-21-21 JUBILEE- ICE CREAM- PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION LUNCH 9-21-21 MACKENTHUNS GROCERY- BUNS, CHEESE, CHIPS, CONDIMENTS, POTATO SALAD, CHIX SALAD FRUIT & VEGGIE TRAYS, PLATES, FORKS- PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION LUNCH 9-21-21 PESTICIDE RECERTIFICATION- LICENSE- U OF M EXTENSION CLASS- D. KOSKELA TONKA VAC & TUNES- NEW HANDLE FOR VACUUM-HWS Invoice 102521 9/132021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R AMAZON.COM- DISPOSABLE PLASTIC CUPS FOR RESALE- HWS Invoice 102521 9222021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa AMAZON.COM- BARREL AGED IN A BOTTLE OAK INFUSION SPIRALS- HWS Invoice 102521 9222021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 102521 9222021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 102521 9222021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 102521 9222021 Transaction Date 10252021 AMAZON.COM- LANDS END MEN'S SHORT SLEEVE POLO- JADE XXL R. GUST- HWS AMAZON.COM- LANDS END WOMEN'S SHORT SLEEVE POLO- NAVY MED- HWS AMAZON.COM- LANDS END WOMEN'S SHORT SLEEVE POLO- NAVY SMALL- HWS Wells Fargo 10100 Total 11/12/21 3:59 PM Page 1 $71.25 $840.66 $6.25 $43.01 $213.75 $74.75 $13.50 $160.92 $145.00 $69.83 $7.16 $47.75 $22.48 $11.83 $10.75 $1,738.89 Refer 3 ELAN CREDIT CARD _ 2630 CITY OF MOUND 11/12/21 3:59 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: October 2021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 511 INC-UNIFORM BOOTS W/ SIDE ZIP- -$130.50 ANDY DRILLING- RECLASS TO EMERGENCY MGMT FROM FIRE DEPT Invoice 102521-2 9222021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM- 2 QTY STEVE MADDENS $27.48 REVERSIBLE LEATHER BELT BLACK/BROWN- FIRE MEN UNIFORMS Invoice 102521-2 9/172021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM-4 QTY FIREFIGHTER $28.80 LIEUTENANT COLLAR BRASS INSIGNIA EMBLEM PINS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 102521-2 9/172021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training SUN COUNTRY- AIRFARE, SEATS, $210.80 BAGGAGE - G. PALM- VOLUNTEER FIRE CHIEFS & OFFICERS SYMPOSIUM- CLEARWATER FLORIDA- NOV 10TH THRU 13TH 2O21 Invoice 102521-2 9232021 Cash Payment G 222-22801 Deposits/Escrow PAYPAL-ZETTLE MOBILE READERS- QTY 4 $201.07 REIMBURSED BY MFD RELIEF ASSOC RECPT #69279 9-28-21 Invoice 102521-2 9/152021 Cash Payment E 101-42115-210 Operating Supplies 511 INC-UNIFORM BOOTS W/ SIDE ZIP- $130.50 ANDY DRILLING- RECLASS TO EMERGENCY MGMT FROM FIRE DEPT Invoice 102521-2 9222021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM- 2 QTY STEVE MADDENS $61.78 REVERSIBLE LEATHER BELT BLACK/BROWN & 4 QTY BLACK MENS SOLID TIES- FIRE MEN UNIFORMS Invoice 102521-2 9/172021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM-8 QTY FIREFIGHTER $87.60 CAPTAIN COLLAR BRASS INSIGNIA EMBLEM PINS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 102521-2 9/172021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM-2 QTY FIREFIGHTER $109.50 LIEUTENANT COLLAR BRASS RANK & 2 CROSSED FIRE CHIEF BUGLES, 2 CROSSED DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF BUGLES- INSIGNIA EMBLEM PINS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 102521-2 9/172021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies COSTCO- 911 EVENT- COOKIES, COFFEE $181.54 CREAMER, HOT CUPS, LEMONADE MIX, OJ, ICE MTN DRINKS, KOOL AID, BELVITA, COFFEE, 2 45 QT STORAGE TUBBIES NAPKINS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 102521-2 9/102021 Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies COSTCO- 911 EVENT- COOKIES, COFFEE $181.53 CREAMER, HOT CUPS, LEMONADE MIX, OJ, ICE MTN DRINKS, KOOL AID, BELVITA, COFFEE, 2 45 QT STORAGE TUBBIES NAPKINS- CITY COUNCIL Invoice 102521-2 9/102021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM 2 QTY WEDGEIT DOOR $78.88 STOPS, HDMI CABLE HIGH SPEED 35', 4K HDMI CABLE 30' HIGH SPEED- FIRE DEPT Invoice 102521-2 9282021 020101 CITY OF MOUND 11/12/21 3:59 PM Page 3 Payments Current Period: October 2021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM- 5 QTY STEVE MADDENS $210.25 REVERSIBLE LEATHER BELT BLACK/BROWN & 14 QTY BLACK MENS SOLID TIES- FIRE MEN UNIFORMS Invoice 102521-2 9172021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies GALLS- 27 QTY- WHITE DUTY LONG $402.94 SLEEVE SHIRTS- FIREMEN Invoice 102521-2 9/42021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM - 1 SQUARE & 2 $64.57 RECTANGULAR TABLECLOTHS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 102521-2 922021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM - 6 RECTANGULAR $34.44 TABLECLOTHS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 102521-2 922021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM- 911 EVENT- PAPER PLATES, $17.54 RED, WHITE & BLUE- FIRE DEPT Invoice 102521-2 9/12021 Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM- 911 EVENT- PAPER PLATES, $17.53 RED, WHITE & BLUE- CITY COUNCIL Invoice 102521-2 9/12021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM- 911 EVENT- 48 QTY 8 X 12" $34.84 HANDHELD AMERICAN STICK FLAGS - FIRE DEPT Invoice 102521-2 9/12021 Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM- 911 EVENT- 48 QTY 8 X 12" $34.84 HANDHELD AMERICAN STICK FLAGS - CITY COUNCIL Invoice 102521-2 9/12021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies STRETCHERS- 25 QTY REVERSE PATCH $37.50 FLAGS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 102521-2 9/82021 Cash Payment G 222-22801 Deposits/Escrow SUN COUNTRY- SPOUSE- C. PALM- $144.80 AIRFARE, SEATS -VOLUNTEER FIRE CHIEFS & OFFICERS SYMPOSIUM- CLEARWATER FLORIDA- NOV 10TH THRU 13TH 2O21- TO BE REIMBURSED Invoice 102521-2 9232021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training SUN COUNTRY- AIRFARE, SEATS, $210.80 BAGGAGE-M. MCCARVILLE-VOLUNTEER FIRE CHIEFS & OFFICERS SYMPOSIUM- CLEARWATER FLORIDA- NOV 10TH THRU 13TH 2O21 Invoice 102521-2 9252021 Cash Payment G 222-22801 Deposits/Escrow SUN COUNTRY- SPOUSE- L. MCCARVILLE- $146.80 AIRFARE, SEATS -VOLUNTEER FIRE CHIEFS & OFFICERS SYMPOSIUM- CLEARWATER FLORIDA- NOV 10TH THRU 13TH 2O21- REIMBURSED- RECPT #69297 10- 6-21 Invoice 102521-2 9252021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training PIER HOUSE 60 BEACH & MARINA- $688.17 LODGING -G. PALM -VOLUNTEER FIRE CHIEFS & OFFICERS SYMPOSIUM- CLEARWATER FLORIDA- NOV 10TH THRU 13TH 2O21 Invoice 102521-2 10/32021 0201CY CITY OF MOUND 11/12/21 3:59 PM Page 4 Payments Current Period: October 2021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training PIER HOUSE 60 BEACH & MARINA- $717.55 LODGING- M. MCCARVILLE- VOLUNTEER FIRE CHIEFS & OFFICERS SYMPOSIUM- CLEARWATER FLORIDA- NOV 10TH THRU 13TH 2O21 Invoice 102521-2 10/32021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training INTL ASSOC OF FIRE CHIEFS CONFERENCE $565.00 REGISTRATION - M. MCCARVILLE- VOLUNTEER FIRE CHIEFS & OFFICERS SYMPOSIUM- CLEARWATER FLORIDA- NOV 10TH THRU 13TH 2O21 Invoice 102521-2 9282021 Transaction Date 10252021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,496.55 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $1,086.58 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $4,132.15 601 WATER FUND $840.66 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $176.05 $6,235.44 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $6,235.44 Total $6,235.44 02010 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 Payments Batch 112321CITY $53,182.82 Refer 200 ADVANCED FIRST AID INC _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies Invoice 0721-379 7/132021 Transaction Date 11/162021 STRYKER EVACUATION CHAIR, LOCKING REAR LIFT HANDLES IN-SERVICE VIDEO DVD, FOOT REST- FIRE DEPT U.S. Bank 10130 Total Refer 201 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic REPLACE BELMONT METER MH PLC Invoice 36363 1122021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 202 BENDICKSON, WES _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials STREET SWEEPING DEBRIS- DUMP 4 LOADS 10-7-21 Invoice 112321 11/82021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials STREET SWEEPING DEBRIS- DUMP 5 LOADS 10-18-21 Invoice 112321 11/82021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials STREET SWEEPING DEBRIS- DUMP 4 LOADS 10-19-21 Invoice 112321 11/82021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials STREET SWEEPING DEBRIS- DUMP 6 LOADS 11-1-21 Invoice 112321 11/82021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials STREET SWEEPING DEBRIS- DUMP 2 LOADS 11-2-21 Invoice 112321 11/82021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials STREET SWEEPING DEBRIS- DUMP 2 LOADS 11-3-21 Invoice 112321 11/82021 Transaction Date 11/162021 U.S. Bank 10130 Refer 203 BIFFS, INC PORTABLE RESTROO Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W838200 11/32021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W838197 11/32021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W838198 11/32021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W838199 11/32021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W838201 11/32021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Refer 204 CINTAS Total Total 11 /18/21 11:23 AM Page 1 $4,136.00 $4,136.00 $1,514.10 $1,514.10 $320.00 $400.00 $320.00 $480.00 $160.00 $160.00 $1,840.00 PHILBROOK PARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC 10- $88.93 06-21 THRU 10-20-21 CENTERVIEW BEACH BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $120.54 10- 06-21 THRU 10-20-21 SURFSIDE PARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC 10- $561.00 06-21 THRU 11-02-21 SKATEPARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC 10- 06-21 $225.00 THRU 11-02-21 SWENSON PARK BIFFS RENTAL SVC 10- 06- $166.00 21 THRU 11-02-21 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,161.47 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies MATS, TOWELS, CENTERPULL TOWEL REFILL- PUB WKS SHOP- 11-05-21 Invoice 4100903455 11/52021 Project 21-5 $58.16 PONT.,! CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies MATS, TOWELS, DUST MOP, WET MOP- HWS-11-05-21 Invoice 4100903536 11/52021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies MATS, TOWELS, CENTERPULL TOWEL REFILL- PUB WKS SHOP- 11-12-21 Invoice 4101600321 11/122021 Project 21-5 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies MATS, TOWELS, DUST MOP, WET MOP- HWS-11-12-21 Invoice 4101600414 11/122021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 206 DISPLAY SALES Total 11 /18/21 11:23 AM Page 2 $56.84 $58.16 $56.84 $230.00 Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials 20 QTY SILVER POLE PLATES, 27" $1,298.50 ADJUSTABLE BANDING STRAPS 110 QTY 4" BLACK SPADE MOUNT- 25 QTY- SIGN SHOP Invoice 030663 11/42021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Refer 205 DPC INDUSTRIES, INC. Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals Invoice 82000105-21 10/312021 Transaction Date 11/162021 U.S. Bank 10130 Total $1,298.50 150# CHLORINE CYLINDER RENTAL- QTY 12 $120.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.00 Refer 208 ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT & S _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply 6" CLEAN OUT PLUG Invoice 21871 11/82021 Transaction Date 11/162021 U.S. Bank 10130 Refer 211 FIRE BY TRADE LLC Total Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 36" VELCRO HOSE STRAPS- 36 QTY - FIRE DEPT Invoice 1122021 1122021 PO 25271 Transaction Date 11/172021 U.S. Bank 10130 Total Refer 212 FIRE SAFETY USA, INCORPORATE _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair INSTALL NEW FUEL TANK- FIRE ENGINE #29 2003 SALISBURY Invoice 151580 9/162021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 213 FIRS TNET _ $89.84 $89.84 $462.00 $462.00 $1,739.00 $1,739.00 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC- XXX-0353 FIRE UNIT #39 $38.23 FIRE CHIEF RESCUE UTILITY 9-26-21 THRU 10-25-21 Invoice 28729091103202 10252021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC XXX-0545 FIRE #43 $38.23 RESCUE TRUCK SVC 9-26-21 THRU 10-25- Invoice 28729091103202 10252021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC XXX-1887 FIRE LADDER $38.23 TRUCK#44 SVC 9-26-21 THRU 10-25-21 Invoice 28729091103202 10252021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC XXX-1962 FIRE ENGINE #29 $38.23 SVC 9-26-21 THRU 10-25-21 Invoice 28729091103202 10252021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC XXX-4845 FIRE UNIT #42 $38.23 DUTY OFFICER SVC 9-26-21 THRU 10-25-21 Invoice 28729091103202 10252021 02010 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELLPHONE SVC XXX-0150- CHIEF G. PEDERSON- 9-26-21 THRU 10-25-21 Invoice 28729091103202 10252021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 214 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-10-30-21- TO 11-29-21 Invoice 112321 10/302021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-10-30-21- TO 11-29-21 Invoice 112321 10/302021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-10-30-21- TO 11-29-21 Invoice 112321 10/302021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-10-30-21- TO 11-29-21 Invoice 112321 10/302021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-10-30-21- TO 11-29-21 Invoice 112321 10/302021 Cash Payment E 101-41930-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-10-30-21- TO 11-29-21 Invoice 112321 10/302021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-10-30-21- TO 11-29-21 Invoice 112321 10/302021 Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-10-30-21- TO 11-29-21 Invoice 112321 10/302021 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC-10-30-21- TO 11-29-21 Invoice 112321 10/302021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 210 GOLDETSKY, ROCHELLE _ Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4973 THREE PTS BLVD- UTILITY REFUND- R.GOLDETSKY 11 /18/21 11:23 AM Page 3 $53.66 $244.81 $50.14 $226.92 $193.82 $188.12 $188.12 $475.65 $158.55 $79.28 $79.28 $1,639.88 $83.08 Invoice 112321 11/152021 Transaction Date 11/172021 U.S. Bank 10130 Total $83.08 Refer 215 GO VDEALS _ Cash Payment R 602-49450-39101 Sales of General Fixe 7.5 %ONLINE AUCTION FEES -PUBLIC $532.50 WORKS EQUIPMENT SOLD -PUBLIC WORKS- COMPACT PIPE RANGER & REEL - SEWER DEPT Invoice 7967-102021 10/312021 Transaction Date 11/172021 U.S. Bank 10130 Total $532.50 Refer 216 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PW RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE - $327.92 OCTOBER 2021 Invoice 1000174290 10/312021 Project 21-5 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE & $2,205.22 ADMINISTRATION FEE- OCTOBER 2021 Invoice 1000174290 10/312021 Cash Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi EMERGENCY MGMT RADIO LEASE & $63.73 ADMINISTRATION FEE- OCTOBER 2021 Invoice 1000174290 10/312021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,596.87 Refer 217 HO VDA, SAM _ Cash Payment E 285-46300-430 Miscellaneous LOST LAKE SLIP DOCK PROGRAM KEY $50.00 DEPOSIT RETURN REFUND- S. HOVDA Invoice 112321 11/102021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 Refer 2181STATE TRUCK CENTER Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BRAKE REPAIR KIT- CAMSHAFT REPAIR, OIL SEAL RETAINER, BRAKE SLACK ADJUSTER, CLEVIS KIT- STREETS TRUCK #412 Invoice C241355201 11/152021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BRAKE SLACKADJUSTER-STREETS TRUCK #412 Invoice C241354812-03 11/102021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BRAKE REPAIR KIT- CAMSHAFT REPAIR, OIL SEAL RETAINER, BRAKE SLACK ADJUSTER, CLEVIS KIT, BUSHING, SEAL, OILS SEAL- AXLE SHAFT- STREETS TRUCK #412 Invoice C241355201-01 11/152021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BRAKE REPAIR KIT PARTS- STREETS TRUCK#412 Invoice C241354812-02 11/102021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 219 JOHNSON CONTROLS - TYCO INC. Cash Payment E 222-42260-440 Other Contractual Servic TEST & INSPECTION OF ALARM & DETECTION MONITORING SYSTEM 12-01-21 THRU 11-30-22 PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG- FIRE DEPT Invoice 22585813 11/12021 Cash Payment E 101-41930-440 Other Contractual Servic TEST & INSPECTION OF ALARM & DETECTION MONITORING SYSTEM 12-01-21 THRU 11-30-22 PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG- CITY HALL Invoice 22585813 11/12021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 207 LABELWORKS STORE Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 0019022 11/52021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Refer 220 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 9308972427 11/42021 Transaction Date 11/172021 12MM 1/2" X 30' WHITE ON BLACK PET TAPE- 2 QTY- FIRE DEPT U.S. Bank 10130 Total MINI CUT OFF WHEEL 3" DIAMETER- PARKS DEPT Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 221 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA B200 PW COPIER OVERAGE CHG 10-10-21 THRU 11-09-21 Invoice 3872734 11/82021 Project 21-5 Cash Payment E 609-49750-202 Duplicating and copying HWS COPIER -CANON C26501F - COLOR OVERAGE- 8-01-21 THRU 10-31-21 Invoice 3865633 11/12021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-202 Duplicating and copying HWS COPIER -CANON C26501F - B & W OVERAGE- 8-01-21 THRU 10-31-21 Invoice 3865633 11/12021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 222 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR 11 /18/21 11:23 AM Page 4 $212.68 $85.48 $258.65 $17.75 $574.56 $187.50 $187.50 $375.00 $41.70 $41.70 $31.92 $31.92 $2.12 $31.56 $48.69 $82.37 201CIFI CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying CANON C2501F FIRE COPIER -COLOR OVERAGE CHARGES- 8-01-21 THRU 10-31- Invoice 3865624 11/12021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying CANON C2501F FIRE COPIER - B & W OVERAGE CHARGES- 8-01-21 THRU 10-31- Invoice 3865624 11/12021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 223 MEDIACOM _ Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 11-16-21 THRU 12-15-21 Invoice 112321 11/62021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 350 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-470 Water Samples MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM WATER TESTS -10 Invoice 1117479 11/152021 Transaction Date 11/182021 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota 11 /18/21 11:23 AM Page 5 $183.55 $158.87 $342.42 $96.90 $96.90 $110.00 $110.00 Refer 224 MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 3/8" FINE ASPHALT- 1.03 TON 11-4-21 $144.00 STREETS Invoice 271979 11/192021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $144.00 Refer 225 MULCH STORE, THE _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material 4.5 CUBIC YARDS BRUSH DISPOSAL- 10-22- $36.00 21 Invoice 104072522 10222021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $36.00 Refer 226 NAPA AUTO PARTS - SPRING PAR _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply 6/12V 2.5 AMP BATTERY MAINTAINER- $35.26 PARKS Invoice 0577-146698 10/192021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35.26 Refer 227 NASSEFF MECHANICAL CONTRAC _ Cash Payment E 285-46388-440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR RPZ @ 5510-5564 AUDITORS ROAD- $1,139.12 HARBOR DISTRICT Invoice 36013 11/52021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,139.12 Refer 228 OFFICE DEPOT _ Cash Payment E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies Invoice 204378693001 10282021 PO 25308 Transaction Date 11/172021 3 CASES COPY PAPER, 6X9 WHITE ENVELOPES, CORRECTION CARTRIDGES, 2 PACKS LAMINATING POUCHES -CITY HALL Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 246 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS, LLC Cash Payment E 601-49400-307 Admin/Finance/Compute OCT 2021 -CIS DATA HOSTING, PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 211071 11/152021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-307 Admin/Finance/Compute OCT 2021 -CIS DATA HOSTING, PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 211071 11/152021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage OCT 2021- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $158.42 $158.42 $1,862.10 $1,862.10 $346.91 Invoice 211071 11/152021 2638 CITY OF MOUND Payments 11 /18/21 11:23 AM Page 6 Current Period: November 2021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-322 Postage OCT 2021- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $346.90 Invoice 211071 11/152021 Transaction Date 11/182021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,418.01 Refer 244 RAY MAR PROPERTIES, INC. _ Cash Payment R 101-41000-36100 SPECIAL ASSESSME REFUND OVERPAYMENT CENTRAL $1,375.40 BUSINESS DISTRICT- 2020-2021 PARKING LOT REPAIR & MTCE ASSESSMENT Invoice 112321 11/152021 Transaction Date 11/182021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,375.40 Refer 209 STEVENS, EVA _ Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2865 HALSTEAD LN- UTILITY REFUND- E. $230.76 STEVENS Invoice 112321 11/152021 Transaction Date 11/172021 U.S. Bank 10130 Total $230.76 Refer 229 SUN NEWSPAPERS-HWS ACCT. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising VETERANS DAY SALUTE AD 11-11-21- HWS $17.31 Invoice 863533 11/142021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising VETERANS DAY SALUTE AD 11-06-21- HWS $7.69 Invoice 862395 11/72021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising SMALL BUSINESS SATURDAY AD 11-13-21- $15.84 HWS Invoice 863534 11/142021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $40.84 Refer 230 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE-ORD 05-2021 TO AMEND $23.13 ZONING ORD CHPT 129- TO ESTABLISH 2 NEW MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS, REMOVE 3 PUD EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS AND INCLUDES NEW USE - RELATED DEFINITIONS- PUBLISHED 10-24-21 Invoice 859680 10232021 Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE-ORD 06-2021 TO AMEND $23.13 ZONING ORD CHPT 129- TO ESTABLISH 2 NEW MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS, REMOVE 3 PUD EXISTING ZONING DISTRICTS AND INCLUDES NEW USE - RELATED DEFINITIONS- PUBLISHED 10-24-21 Invoice 859681 10232021 Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE-ORD 07-2021 TO AMEND $26.99 ZONING ORD CHPT 129- TO REZONE THE ZONING DISTRICT OF A FEW PARCELS TO COME INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2040 COMP PLAN- PUBLISHED 10-24-21 Invoice 859682 10232021 Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE-ORD 08-2021 TO AMEND $19.28 ZONING ORD CHPT 129- TO REZONE THE ZONING DISTRICT OF A NUMBER OF PARCELS TO THE NEW ZONING DISTRICT MU-C MIXED USE CORRIDOR DISTRICT - PUBLISHED 10-24-21 Invoice 859683 10232021 02010+. CITY OF MOUND 11/18/2111:23AM Page 7 Payments Current Period: November 2021 Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE-ORD 09-2021 TO AMEND $19.28 ZONING ORD CHPT 129- TO REZONE THE ZONING DISTRICT OF A NUMBER OF PARCELS TO THE NEW ZONING DISTRICT MU-D MIXED USE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT - PUBLISHED 10-24-21 Invoice 859684 10232021 Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE-PUB HEARING TO REZONE $69.39 PROPERTIES @ 5084 & 5098 THREE PTS BLVD FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MIXED USE B-3 NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS TO MU-C MIXED USED CORRIDOR- PUBLISHED 11-13- 21 Invoice 862902 11/132021 Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE-PUB HEARING TO CONSIDER $53.97 A 2040 COMP PLAN AMENDMENT TO REGUIDE PROPERTIES @ 5084 & 5098 THREE PTS BLVD FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MIXED -USE- PUBLISHED 11-06-21 Invoice 861679 11/62021 Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE-PUB HEARING TO CONSIDER $50.12 AMENDMENTS TO CITY CODE CHAPTER 42 NUISANCES PERTAINING TO LIGHTING & GLARE- PUBLISHED 11-13-21 Invoice 862901 11/132021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $285.29 Refer 231 TONKA PLUMBING HEATING & CL _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maintenance INSTALL A CUNO 18" CANISTER TYPE $2,876.00 WATER FILTER & A 38,000 GRAIN ON DEMAND WATER SOFTENING SYSTEM - PIPE TO CONNECT- REPLACE FAULTY BREAK ROOM FURNACE CIRCUIT BOARD - PUBLIC WORKS BLDG- 10-26-21 Invoice 12846 11/42021 Project 21-5 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic REPIPE DEDUCT METER TO NEW POSITION $650.00 ON MAIN LINE @ 1861 COMMERCE BLVD- 10- 26-21 Invoice 12849 11/52021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,526.00 Refer 245 ULINE _ Cash Payment E 101-41930-210 Operating Supplies 1 CASE 12 OZ PAPER HOT CUPS- CITY HALL $136.05 Invoice 141049736 Transaction Date 11/82021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $136.05 Refer 232 VERIZON WIRELESS _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET- $35.01 INTERNET SVC- 10-11-21 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR- RYAN $35.01 PRICH TABLET- INTERNET SVC- 10-11-21 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 Project 21-5 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS DEPT-TABLET- HOT SPOT $35.01 SVC 10-11-21 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 Project 21-5 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $17.50 SVC- SVC 10-11-21 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 2640 CITY OF MOUND 11/18/2111:23AM Page 8 Payments Current Period: November 2021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $17.51 SVC- SVC 10-11-21 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $35.01 SVC 10-11-21 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS DEPT TABLET INTERNET SVC 10- $35.01 11-21 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS OPEN LINE INTERNET SVC 10-11- $35.01 21 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 Project 21-5 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER INTERNET SVC 10-11-21 $17.51 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 Cash Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER INTERNET SVC 10-11-21 $17.50 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY DEPT TABLET- INTERNET SVC 10- $17.51 11-21 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY DEPT TABLET- INTERNET SVC 10- $17.50 11-21 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS DEPT TABLET- INTERNET SVC 10-11- $35.01 21 THRU 11-10-21 Invoice 9892519930 11/102021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $350.10 Refer 233 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN Cash Payment E 101-41930-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispose GARBAGE SVC NOVEMBER 2021- CITY $88.22 HALL & FIRE DEPT Invoice 7574858-1593-5 11/32021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispose GARBAGE SVC NOVEMBER 2021- CITY $88.23 HALL & FIRE DEPT Invoice 7574858-1593-5 11/32021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $176.45 Refer 234 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic OCTOBER 2021 ANNUAL WATER SYSTEM $2,950.00 LEAK SURVEY& REPORT Invoice 11771 11/122021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,950.00 Refer 237 XCEL ENERGY _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC- 9-23-21 TO 10-24-21 $142.63 Invoice 754577497 1122021 Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC- 9-23-21 TO 10-24-21- $80.34 DEPOT BLDG Invoice 754577497 1122021 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC- 9-23-21 TO 10-24-21 $2,804.21 Invoice 754577497 1122021 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC- 9-23-21 TO 10-24-21 $1,102.95 Invoice 754577497 1122021 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC- 9-23-21 TO 10-24-21 $3,260.09 Invoice 754577497 1122021 020%11 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 754577497 1122021 Cash Payment E 101-41930-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 754577497 1122021 Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 754577497 1122021 Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 754577497 1122021 Cash Payment E 285-46388-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 754577497 1122021 Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 754577497 1122021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Refer 236 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 754779854 11/32021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Refer 235 YORK NOEL & DIANE Cash Payment E 285-46300-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 112321 11/52021 Transaction Date 11/172021 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 285 HRA/HARBOR DISTRICT 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND ELECTRIC SVC- 9-23-21 TO 10-24-21 ELECTRIC SVC- 9-23-21 TO 10-24-21 ELECTRIC SVC- 9-23-21 TO 10-24-21 ELECTRIC SVC- 9-23-21 TO 10-24-21 ELECTRIC SVC- 9-23-21 TO 10-24-21 ELECTRIC SVC- 9-23-21 TO 10-24-21 Wells Fargo 10100 11 A 8/21 11:23 AM Page 9 $1,724.30 $1,163.27 $1,163.27 $1,181.46 $1,165.17 $44.51 Total $13,832.20 ELECTRIC SVC 10-03-21 THRU 11-02-21 CITY OWNED STREET LIGHTS Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,906.00 $4,906.00 LOST LAKE SLIP DOCK PROGRAM KEY $50.00 DEPOSIT RETURN REFUND- N. & D. YORK Wells Fargo 10100 Wells Fargo $13,993.26 $6,129.00 $2,404.29 $11,036.33 $8,719.57 $2,185.99 $44,468.44 10130 U.S. Bank 101 GENERAL FUND $3,228.34 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $4,639.70 601 WATER FUND $313.84 602 SEWER FUND $532.50 $8,714.38 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $53,182.82 Total $53,182.82 10100 Total $50.00 z0%,y CITY OF MOUND 11/18/21 12:02 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: November 2021 Payments Batch 112321 HWS $102,879.13 Refer 300 AM CRAFT SPIRITS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $375.85 Invoice 13355 11/112021 Transaction Date 11/182021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $375.85 Refer 301 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,380.35 Invoice 3505547 11/52021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $890.25 Invoice 3506765 11/112021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,270.60 Refer 304 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $250.00 Invoice 0092359000 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $3.30 Invoice 0092359000 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,410.65 Invoice 0092358200 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $44.55 Invoice 0092358200 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$95.33 Invoice 0092082100 11/12021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,271.90 Invoice 0092063700 10292021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $18.60 Invoice 0092063700 10292021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $261.00 Invoice 0092180800 11/52021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $7.65 Invoice 0092180800 11/52021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,172.32 Refer 303 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $8,699.68 Invoice 0092142800 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $918.60 Invoice 0092247100 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $63.38 Invoice 0092142800 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $11.55 Invoice 0092247100 11/102021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,693.21 Refer 302 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS, DUM DUM POPS $93.25 Invoice 0104234800 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $59.00 Invoice 0104234800 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- CORKSCREW $9.75 Invoice 0104234800 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS $76.25 Invoice 0104268800 11/172021 2643 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 0104269800 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- GIFT BAGS & BOXES, 2 PACK CARDED SPPEED POUR Invoice 0104268700 11/172021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 305 BIG AXE BREWING CO. LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 2929 11/92021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 7472 11/102021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Refer 307 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 341760247 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 341760248 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 341760249 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 341852557 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 341689493 11/32021 Transaction Date 11/162021 BEER Wells Fargo 10100 BEER Wells Fargo 10100 11/18/21 12:02 PM Page 2 $56.00 $32.40 Total $326.65 $87.82 Total $87.82 $96.00 Total $96.00 BEER $239.40 BEER $76.50 BEER $2,199.55 BEER $12,496.95 BEER $4,069.33 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 308 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 341759825 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 341759823 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 341854963 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 341854962 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 341759824 11/102021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $19,081.73 $852.00 $1,174.90 $96.00 $1,661.43 $31.46 $3,815.79 Refer 309 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES, L.P. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$36.85 Invoice 2617478 11/92021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,632.70 Invoice 2617479 11/92021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $9,092.70 Invoice 2620133 11/162021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $178.34 Invoice 2620157 11/162021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $40.98 Invoice 2617480 11/92021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $80.10 Invoice 2616655 11/92021 2644 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2620132 11/162021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT Invoice 2620156 11/162021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 310 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO. Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 605509 11/82021 Transaction Date 11/162021 BEER Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 311 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1491146 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1491147 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1492335 11/122021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 312 FLAHERTY S HAPPY TYME COMP _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 37731 11/122021 Transaction Date 11/182021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 313 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 457363 11/92021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 457363 11/92021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 457364 11/92021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 459231 11/162021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 459230 11/162021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 459230 11/162021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT Invoice 64612 9212021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT Invoice 64767 10/42021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 314 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 3240284 11/42021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 3240285 11/42021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 3240313 11/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 3214294 11/112021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 11/18/21 12:02 PM Page 3 $285.30 -$26.33 Total $11,246.94 $1,446.00 Total Total $1,446.00 $56.00 $1,010.60 $100.00 $1,166.60 $118.80 Total $118.80 Total Total $36.00 $56.25 $409.00 $2,056.00 $76.20 $22.50 -$35.00 -$33.75 $2.587.20 $194.25 $5,871.54 $83.10 $2,759.70 $8.908.59 Refer 315 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ 2645 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1929100 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1929101 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1934063 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1934061 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1934062 11/172021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo Refer 316 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 41258 11/42021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Refer 317 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 37636 11/42021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 37641 11/52021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 37656 11/112021 Transaction Date 11/162021 10100 Total BEER Wells Fargo 10100 Total DELIVERY SVC 11-4-21 DELIVERY SVC 11-5-21 DELIVERY SVC 11-11-21 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 318 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maintenance WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 10-04-21 Invoice 180191964 10/312021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 319 MODIST BREWING CO. LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 26845 11/172021 Transaction Date 11/182021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 320 MOOSE LAKE BREWING CO. LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1108-003 11/82021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 321 MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSOC Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals Invoice 12012021 12/12021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Refer 322 OUTSTATE BREWING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 1730 11/42021 Transaction Date 11/162021 DECEMBER 2021 COMMON AREA MTCE & INSURANCE HWS Wells Fargo 10100 Total BEER Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 323 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 146331 11/152021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 146331 11/152021 0200, 11If 8/21 12:02 PM Page 4 $2,074.58 $4,133.10 $42.95 $3,584.06 $1,812.59 $11,647.28 $222.00 $222.00 $377.00 $73.95 $204.45 $655.40 $74.81 $74.81 $218.50 $218.50 $84.00 $84.00 $1,038.13 $1,038.13 $152.00 $152.00 $920.00 $12.50 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 145337 11/82021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 145337 11/52021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 324 PEQUOD DISTRIBUTION Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 123799 11/52021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Refer 325 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 6301812 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 6301813 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 6305614 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 6301814 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 6305615 11/172021 Transaction Date 11/162021 BEER Wells Fargo 10100 11/18/21 12:02 PM Page 5 $227.66 $5.25 Total $1,165.41 $556.80 Total $556.80 LIQUOR $1,200.38 WINE $500.00 LIQUOR $802.00 WINE $192.00 WINE $825.24 Wells Fargo Refer 326 PRYES BREWING COMPANY, LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 29461 11/112021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo Refer 327 SHAMROCK GROUP, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 2698125 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 2696178 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa mix Invoice 2702035 11/172021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo Refer 340 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M 10100 Total $3,519.62 $329.67 10100 Total $329.67 10100 Total $110.36 $66.00 $138.10 $314.46 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $592.00 Invoice 2144229 11/52021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,687.50 Invoice 2144230 11/52021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $0.00 Invoice 2144229 11/52021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,173.71 Invoice 2144231 11/52021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $0.00 Invoice 2145784 11/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $658.00 Invoice 2145782 11/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $88.00 Invoice 2145783 11/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $254.40 Invoice 2145781 11/112021 2647 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2148941 11/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2148940 11/182021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT Invoice 2126295CR 9/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT Invoice 2126296CR 9/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT Invoice 2124225CR 9/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT Invoice 2124224CR 9/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Invoice 9317093 1122021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Invoice 9317094 1122021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT Invoice 9317098 1122021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT Invoice 9317097 1122021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT Invoice 9317096 1122021 Transaction Date 11/182021 Wells Fargo Refer 329 STARRY EYED BREWING CO. LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 5404 11/172021 Transaction Date 11/182021 10100 BEER Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 330 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0291169 11/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 0291168 11/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0291168 11/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 0290554 11/42021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0290554 11/42021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 331 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0290555 11/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0290555 11/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 0290556 11/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0290556 11/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 0291334 11/122021 11A8/21 12:02 PM Page 6 $560.00 $1,944.43 -$120.00 -$32.00 -$36.00 -$152.00 -$172.11 -$54.59 -$4.00 -$56.65 -$15.33 Total $8,315.36 $28.00 Total $28.00 Total $24.00 $104.00 $2.50 $120.00 $12.00 $262.50 $90.21 $2.50 $104.00 $2.50 $216.00 0200i] Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 0291334 11/122021 Transaction Date 11/162021 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2021 FREIGHT Wells Fargo Refer 332 WINE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 188691 11/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 188691 11/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 188032 11/42021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 188032 11/42021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 188690 11/112021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 188690 11/112021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo Refer 333 WINE MERCHANTS _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 7354925 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 7356091 11/172021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 7354926 11/102021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo Refer 334 WINEBOW Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 0103587 11/142021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 0103587 11/142021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 100086 9/32021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 102676 10262021 Transaction Date 11/162021 10100 Total 10100 Total 10100 Total WINE FREIGHT WINE CREDIT WINE CREDIT Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 335 Z WINES USA LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 24961 11/102021 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 24961 11/102021 Transaction Date 11/162021 Wells Fargo 10100 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $102,879.13 $102,879.13 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $102,879.13 Total $102,879.13 Total Total 11/18/21 12:02 PM Page 7 $7.50 $422.71 $232.00 $4.20 $1,261.33 $14.85 $179.00 $4.20 $1,695.58 $884.00 $1,296.80 $25.00 $2,205.80 $1,506.00 $18.00 -$128.00 -$111.00 $1,285.00 $282.00 $10.00 $292.00 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 9, 2021 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, November 9, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Ray Salazar; Council members Phil Velsor, Paula Larson, Sherrie Pugh, and Jason Holt Members absent: None Others present: City Manager Eric Hoversten, City Clerk Kevin Kelly, City Planner Rita Trapp, Orono Police Sergeant Tim Sonnek Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Salazar called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2 Pledae of Alleaiance 3. Approve agenda MOTION by Velsor, seconded by Larson, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Larson, seconded by Pugh, to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $363,469.50. B. Approve minutes: 10-19-21 Special Meeting Workshop 10-26-21 Regular Meeting C. RESOLUTION 21:110 RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT AND MUSICAL CONCERT PERMIT FOR 2021 TREE LIGHTING EVENT WITH WAIVED FEES D. Approve Pay Request #2 in the amount of $20,755.14 to R & R Excavating for the 2021 Lift Station Improvement Project, PW 21-03 E. Approve Pay Request #1 in the amount of $49,951.00 to Floorcoat Midwest, LLC for the 2021 Manhole Rehabilitation Project PW 21-04 Approve final closeout pay request in the amount of $17,077.85 to Allied Blacktop Company for the 2021 Seal Coat Project PW 21-07 2650 Mound City Council Minutes — November 9, 2021 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda None were offered. 6. Orono Police Sergeant Tim Sonnek presenting the October Activity Report Sonnek reported on the Orono Police Department (OPD) activity in October which included 314 total incidents compared to in 307 in 2020. Sonnek listed seven crashes, seven alarms, 10 animal complaints, two assaults, 74 medical calls, eight fire assists, zero burglaries, 10 disturbances, one DUI, five domestic calls, eight mental health issues, five thefts, seven parking complaints, 15 welfare checks and 27 traffic stops. Sonnek said the increase of medical calls were due to one individual. Sonnek stated there should be reduction of those calls in November. Sonnek reminded residents of the start of parking restrictions beginning on November 15`h Sonnek said the OPD will begin enforcement during snow events with a warning and then begin ticketing on subsequent snowfall events. Sonnek added there was a theft of a motor vehicle on the eastside of Orono and individuals have been casing areas to look for vehicles. Sonnek reminded residents to lock their vehicles, to not leave possessions in their vehicle and to lock your garage and house. Sonnek said two new officers have been added to the force. Sonnek said the officers are Tim Wessel who has experience with Washington County Water Patrol and as an EMT in Woodbury. Sonnek said the second officer is Colin Hennessy who was with the Carver County SWAT team for five years. Pugh asked about the status of embedded Hennepin County Social Worker program with the OPD. Sonnek stated the program will begin in January of 2022. 7. Planning Case No. 21-07 and Planning Case No. 21-12 Public Hearing - Consideration/action on proposed amendments to City Code Chapter 129 (Zoning Ordinance) related to parking, residential fences and food trucks Trapp presented the three ordinance amendments to be addressed as part of the City zoning update project. Trapp said the zoning update project has been a 2021 zoning update project of the Planning Commission to address inconsistencies between the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and with the City zoning code and zoning map, to add flexibility for property owners in mixed use areas, to address inconsistencies in the zoning code and to update the code to reflect modern standards. Trapp said the areas addressed at this meeting relate to parking regulations, fences and food trucks. Trapp said the parking standards are consolidated from multiple parts of the code in order to reorganize the code, to reflect the new zoning districts as appropriate and make modifications to the minimum parking use table so it is easier to use. Trapp said the amendments include adding missing standards and updating existing standards. Trapp said another change is to multifamily apartments as there is the current of 2 or 2.5 cars per unit standards which don't reflect current realities and the recommendation is to and move to a per bedroom model. Trapp said a 2 or 3 bedroom apartment needs more parking than a studio apartment and the amendment reflects this situation. Trapp said parking standards for what off-street parking can and cannot be used for open storage of goods or vehicles that are inoperable or for sale or rent. 2651 Mound City Council Minutes — November 9, 2021 Trapp said one area which the Planning Commission studied was enclosed or underground parking provisions which were determined infeasible by the project's engineers due to technical or engineering constraints. Trapp said the changes the number of underground parking spaces without requiring a specific number if the site has engineering or technical needs caused by lot grade, poor soils or the location of the water table. Trapp said the amendments regarding fences was a technical change made to reflect current practices and make it easier and straight forward. Trapp said that one change was at area adjacent to unimproved streets and alleys to allow for a six-foot fence in those areas. Trapp said those areas must be of 15 feet width of the adjacent unimproved alleys, fire lanes, and street frontages. Trapp said other amendments were the height of fences being allowed in certain areas for four -foot maximum height and the areas were six foot maximum fences were allowed. Trapp the third area addressed are food truck regulations as staff were directed to address food trucks in the zoning code to address what is happening on private property in Mound. Trapp presented the definition for Food Truck and is being proposed as an accessory use with standards in the zoning code and only on private property as part of a private event. Trapp said staff are trying to provide framework where food truck are allowed and are corresponding to a private event and all on private land. Trapp said the Planning Commission has reviewed the three areas of zoning amendments on October 5th food and parking and/or September 7`h Trapp added a Public Hearing is required for each zoning amendments with summary publishing resolutions corresponding to the zoning amendments. Trapp reminded the Council that there is a statute which requires four votes of the Council to approve the summary publishing of the code amendment. Velsor said there was a case when he was on Planning Commission with a family on Interlachen whose property faced the lake and the street was on other side and the family wanted a six-foot fence on the street side. Velsor said the six-foot fence was approved for the front of house because the lake side was considered the front of the house. Velsor said wondered why this wasn't addressed by the planning commission with code language. Trapp said these specific cases will need to looked at on a case by case basis as opposed to making a blanket ordinance which may not work for every situation. Hoversten said a specific ordinance would divide the community between the Iakeshore owners who could have a six-foot front yard fence and everybody else who could only get a four -foot fence. Hoversten said the alternative would be that a six-foot front yard fence would be allowed to every front yard property in Mound. Hoversten said the road in the specific case Velsor mentioned was a county road and that factored into the decision because there is a different traffic burden at that location. Discussion ensued regarding the specific case which also had a shallow lot 2652 Mound City Council Minutes — November 9, 2021 Salazar said the specific case was from 2018 and the property owner was given a variance because the location had the lake on both sides with fishermen and others walking and hanging out in his yard and the fence was considered a security feature. Velsor said the food truck amendments make sure the City is not making it super difficult for the trucks to come into town because there are benefits to residents. Velsor presented an example of Community Education that wanted to get a permit and do concerts in the park and talked about doing it at the Harbor district. Velsor said he didn't want the City to be a huge hurdle to this happening. Trapp said if an event is being held at the Farmer's Market that event is on public property and treated as part of public gathering permit. Trapp said this ordinance amendment is regarding food truck use on private property. Salazar said the City is allowing an event to have food trucks. Hoversten said a planner can incorporate food trucks at their event if there is pre -planning and this planning is included in their public gathering permit. Salazar said he is concerned that if food trucks are allowed by permit it is conceivable that the permit could be asked for on a weekly basis. Hoversten said there can be consecutive nights of the event such as Music in the Park once a week during the run of those events. Salazar said the food truck should come from a restaurant in the city. Salazar wants the food truck to come from the 10-12 eating establishments in the city. Salazar said the Music in the Park goers will spend their money at out of town food trucks instead of supporting the brick and mortar restaurants in Mound. Salazar said the out of towners are skimming from local restaurants and concert goers won't patronize city restaurants. Salazar has difficulty with this aspect of food truck use. Velsor said if Scotty B would want to be a caterer that would be okay. Velsor said he has gone to food truck festivals out of town due to the variety and quality of the food. Velsor said he goes to Back Channel once or twice a week dependent on which food truck is there because a specific food truck has offerings which can't be found in Mound. Holt said this proposal isn't changing the code but is allowing the new Daruma to put a food truck in their parking lot on private property. Holt said this isn't a conversation about yes or no to food trucks; Holt added he likes food trucks and all the restaurants in town can have a food truck. Pugh said she hosts a family reunion and would want to rent out Surfside and rent out a food truck and asked if the depot rental includes a food truck. Trapp said you can have catering for your event only not for the general public. Trapp said this situation is different because what Pugh proposed is on public land. Hoversten said a food truck couldn't be exclusive for the family reunion as the food truck is in a public area. Velsor said the Daruma situation is a positive for Mound as the Daruma food truck was at Back Channel and the owners wanted to put down roots in Mound and not Spring Park. Salazar agreed he is happy that Daruma is going to be in town and with a food truck. Salazar repeated that he didn't want out of town food trucks to come into the city and said he is a business owner of a restaurant business and the equipment is very expensive. Salazar said he thinks out of town food trucks are skimming and he wants residents to go to local restaurateurs. Salazar said the amendment is duplicative as catering of private events are allowed already. Trapp said the food trucks amendment Is for the catering on restaurant and non -restaurant property and on private land accompanying private events only. a 2653 Mound City Council Minutes — November 9, 2021 Trapp said there is a permit process for public property use and the zoning amendment is for private property use of food trucks. Larson said she started a business in Mound from scratch and understands Salazar's point and she makes a point to buy from local businesses and encourages the restaurants in Mound to cater events at the new Harbor District. Larson said she knows residents of Mound who go to Back Channel for the food trucks. Larson clarified this amendment to the code is for private property and Trapp agreed that it is for private property and there are public food truck regulations already in the code. Pugh said there are 400,000 trips on the Dakota Trail and food trucks are for special occasions only and the Trail has attracted users to local residents and she said there can be path finding sign on the Trail to local restaurants. Hoversten said this discussion and action is specific to the private use of catered private events on how someone in town can cater their private event. Hoversten said Chapter 50 of the city code is primarily for event planners who would like to incorporate a food truck in a public event. Hoversten said a food truck is not much different than a non-profit group providing food for people at a public event. Hoversten this is not a question of amending Chapter 50 of the code and the question before the Council is about private events within Chapter 129 which is the zoning code. Reauested Actions Salazar called a public hearing at 7:50 addressing concurrently the off-street parking standards, residential fences and food trucks. Public hearing closed at 7:51. MOTION by Holt, seconded by Larson, to approve the following ordinance. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 1. ORDINANCE NO. 10-2021 AMENDING CHAPTER 129 (ZONING ORDINANCE) PERTAINING TO OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS MOTION by Holt, seconded by Larson, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 1a. RESOLUTION NO. 21-111: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY, AS IT RELATES TO OFF STREET PARKING STANDARDS MOTION by Velsor, seconded by Larson, to approve the following ordinance. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 2. ORDINANCE NO. 11-2021 AMENDING CHAPTER 129 (ZONING ORDINANCE) PERTAINING TO FENCES ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS MOTION by Holt, seconded by Pugh, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 2654 Mound City Council Minutes — November 9, 2021 2a. RESOLUTION NO. 21-112: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY, AS IT RELATES TO FENCES ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS MOTION by Holt, seconded by Velsor, to approve the following ordinance. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3. ORDINANCE NO. 12-2021 AMENDING CHAPTER 129 (ZONING ORDINANCE) PERTAINING TO FOOD TRUCKS AS AN ACCESSORY USE MOTION by Larson, seconded by Pugh, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3a. RESOLUTION NO. 21-113: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY, AS IT RELATES TO FOOD TRUCKS AS AN ACCESSORY USE 8. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/reports from Council members/City Manager: Larson and Velsor had questions regarding the City Monumentation on Shoreline Drive. Velsor said the construction is correct except for the cap and said he and Larson walked the site and are recommending changes to the placement of the trees and the electrical to illuminate the front of the monument. Hoversten said the monument is hollow and the lights will be bored out and put in place. Velsor said he doesn't like trees and Hoversten said Brian Simmons from Bolton & Menk will provide price and tree options for the site. Hoversten said there are some limitations at the site due to underground utilities in the area. Hoversten said the trees that are present fall short of expectations and that the current six foot trees behind a six-foot monument does not work and would like to add taller trees. Hoversten said a different vendor would need to come in with options of larger trees. Velsor said we need to do this right and how much of an increase is there for the new trees. Hoversten said the City needs to move quickly to get the tree in the ground and hopefully Simmons can offer options this Friday to make a decision on 11 or 12 foot trees. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Pugh, to direct staff to procure appropriate trees for City. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Discussion ensued about the evergreen tree growth which Hoversten said there will need to be ongoing pruning as they grow. Holt asked about the monumentation cap and Velsor said this will be changed. Salazar asked Larson about the cost of six foot trees and Larson said it depends on the warranty and type of tree. Hoversten highlighted the following dates: Winter Parking starts on November 15th December 4`h - Tree lighting event at Veterans Circle with a Santa parade train which will go through the larger community November 11 City Hall Closed — Veteran's Day November 25 & 26 City Hall Closed Thanksgiving 2655 Mound City Council Minutes — November 9, 2021 December 14" tentative date for the City Council photo December 14`h is the City Council budget meeting. B. Reports: Liquor —October 2021 C. Minutes: D. Correspondence: LMCD Board Term Expiration Notice 10. Adjourn MOTION by Velsor, seconded by Holt, to adjourn at 8:10 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Kevin Kelly, Clerk Mayor Raymond J. Salazar n n GIiY OF MOVND PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council APPLICANT: Jeremy Senn DATE: November 17, 2021 LOCATION: Devon Commons Adjacent to 4717 Island View Drive COUNCIL MEETING DATE: November 23, 2021 REQUEST City Code Section 62-11 regulates use of public lands in the City of Mound and states that construction of any kind on any public way, park, or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park, or commons, is unlawful unless a special construction on Public Land Permit is issued. In addition to the Public Lands Permit, City Council approval is required to authorizethe improvements for the structure as provided by City Code Sec. 129-35 (b) (5) related to the lawful, non conforming use. PROJECT DETAILS Jeremy Senn, owner of 4717 Island View Drive, has submitted a Public Lands Permit application requesting approval to replace an existing roof and to undertake minor interior alterations of existing nonconforming habitable structure on Devon Commons adjacent to their property. As part of the proposed project, the applicant proposes to construct an EPDM roof cover instead of the current tar roof and are also looking to install a railing around the sides of it for safety reasons. The owner also is proposing approval to do some interior remodeling (i.e. replacement offlooring, cabinets, window replacement etc.) this winter. NOTIFICATION Neighboring property owners of the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a letter on November 17th to inform them of the City Council's consideration of the application at its November 23rd meeting and that the request was being included on the consent agenda. 2657 In addition to the Public Lands Permit that is required, the project also requires City Council approval to authorize alterations to a non -conforming structure containing a residential use, as provided by City Code Sec., 129-35 (b) (5). The excerpts are provided below: (5) With the approval of the City Council, alterations may be made to a building containing nonconforming residential units when they will improve the livability thereof, provided they will not increase the number of dwelling units or result in the expansion, enlargement or intensification of the use. DEPARTMENT/CONSULTANT/PUBLIC AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to involved departments, consultants and public agencies for review and comment. A summary of the comments received to date are summarized below: MnSpect Building Official Scott Qualle No comment other than that permits will be required for almost all of the work proposed. The roof project requires a standard building permit. LMCD Executive Director Vickie Schleuning It appears that this project is occurring above the 929.4 OHWM. Therefore, the LMCD does not have any specific comments at this time. DISCUSSION 1. Generally speaking the requested improvements are maintenance in nature and are replacing an aging roof and will replace and update existing conditions (i.e. flooring, cabinets, etc.). 2. Staff evaluation of information in the property file is that the structure is lawful, nonconforming. A building permit was issued in 1962 to allow for an addition to a "guest house." 3. The proposed improvements are related to the current structure. No site alteration activities are involved with the proposal, as submitted. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Public Lands Permit application to make alterations to the existing nonconforming structure that contains a nonconforming use on Devon Commons, adjacent to the property at 4717 Island View Drive, as provided by City Code Sec. 129-35 (b) (5), subject to the following conditions: O 1. Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any other local permits (i.e., building permit, etc. to undertake the project. 2. Prior to the commencement of work following permit issuance, applicant is required to discuss parking/staging for involved construction vehicles and materials needed for the proposed project with the Public Works Superintendent; also the seasonal road restrictions. 3. In addition to the Public Lands Permit, applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all required agency permits (i.e., MCWD permit, etc.) needed to undertake the project. In recommending approval of the Public Lands Permit and the request to make improvements to the existing structure on the Commons that contains habitable space and is a nonconforming use, Staff offers the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed improvements will replace an aging roof and improve livability and do not expand the current nonconforming use of the existing structure. The purpose for the railing on the new/replacement EPDM roof is for safety purposes. 2. The proposal is consistent with the regulations in City Code Sec. 129-35 (b) (5). A draft resolution has been prepared for Council consideration. Staff recommends approval. 2659 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 19 RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT TO MODIFY STRUCTURE ON DEVON COMMONS ADJACENT TO 4717 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE AND TO AUTHORIZE IMPROVEMENTS AS PROVIDED BY CITY CODE SEC. 129-36 (b) (6) RELATED TO NONCONFORMING USES WHEREAS, applicant, Jeremy Senn, owner of the property at 4717 Island View Drive, has submitted a Public Lands Permit application requesting approval to replace an existing roof and to undertake minor interior alterations of existing nonconforming habitable structure on Devon Commons adjacent to their property. As part of the proposed project, the applicant proposes to construct an EPDM roof cover instead of the current tar roof and are also looking to install a railing around the sides of it for safety reasons. The owner also is proposing approval to do some interior remodeling (i.e. replacement of flooring, cabinets, window replacement, etc.) this winter. WHEREAS, City Code Section 62-11, requires City Council approval by a majority vote for construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park or commons; and WHEREAS, in addition to the Public Lands Permit, City Council approval is required to authorize the improvements for the structure as provided by City Code Sec. 129-35 (b) (5) related to the lawful, non -conforming use; and WHEREAS, details regarding the request are contained in the Public Lands Permit Report dated November 17, 2021 which included Staff's recommendation for approval, subject to conditions, and the submitted application and materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered this request at their meeting on Tuesday, November 23, 2021; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60-day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much additional time is needed. The City Council's decision on the request to allow modifications to the structure containing a lawful nonconforming use pursuant as provided by City Code Sec, 129-35 (b) (5) was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99. Public Lands Permits are not subject to the timeline requirements of Minnesota Statute Section 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the Public Lands Permit, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed improvements will replace an aging roof and improve livability and do not expand the current nonconforming use of the existing structure. The purpose for the railing on the new/replacement EPDM roof is for safety purposes. 2. The proposal is consistent with the regulations in City Code Sec. 129-35 (b) (5). THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approves the resolution approving the Public Lands Permit application to make alterations to the existing nonconforming structure that contains a nonconforming use on Devon Commons, adjacent to the property at 4717 Island View Drive pursuant to City Code Sec. 129-35 (b) (5), subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any other local permits (i.e., building permit, etc). to undertake the project. 2. Prior to the commencement of work following permit issuance, applicant is required to discuss parking/staging for involved construction vehicles and materials needed for the proposed project with the Public Works Superintendent; also the seasonal road restrictions. 3. In addition to the Public Lands Permit, applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all required agency permits (i.e., MCWD permit, etc.) needed to undertake the project. Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of November, 2021. Mayor Raymond J. Salazar Attest: Kevin Kelly, City Clerk 2661 r TY of ur�o 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 Fax 952472-MO PUBLIC LANDS APPLICATION., Parks and Open Space CO ate 1 - DISTRIBUTION Building Official Date Received City Council Date Parks Director Public Works _ _ _ _ Other Check One CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT — new construction. NOTE: NO PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUSES OR OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND - City Code Section 62-11(a) & (b). ka PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT — to allow repairs to an existing structure -City Code Section 62-11(c). ❑ CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE — to allow an existing encroachment to remain in an "as is" condition - City Code Section 62-11(g). ❑ LAND ALTERATION — change in shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, fill, etc. - City Code Section 62-11(d). The structure or work you are requesting is an activity on publicly owned lands. Structures like boat houses, patios, sheds, etc. are all NONCONFORMING USES. It Is the intent of the City to bring all these uses Into conformance, which means that those structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. All permits are granted for a lanited time and are non -transferable. Stairway construction must meet the State Building Code when the permit Is for new construction, or a new permit is applied for due to a change in dock site holder. Please or point legibly f APPLICANT {Name ¢E tt' em N Email se Vi✓t (� li �tcrO . Ccc� Address ABUTTING PROPERTY LEGAL DESC. i Phone(H) Address Lot Subdivision I PID # Public Lands Permit Application Page 1 of 2 Revised 611512021 Block it Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 81 82 83 (Circle one) 2662 PUBLIC Name PROPERTY Dock Site # CONTRACTOR Name Address_ Phone(H) _ (W) Etnal I Shoreline Type Email (M)— A FEE OF $200.00 APPLIES IF VALUATION OF PROJECT EXCEEDS $1,000.00 AND NO PUBLIC BENEFIT IS DERIVED. PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS) DESCRIBE REQUEST & PURPOSEI'Vr_=e ��i✓ u�� rp 71 et `� fix,` �'`�`�� r ", 1� 0 DINM roo�- 41%. j Iqef-v 517A, -y Y^ca' h ., 50, 46 i-e u iv T�Ae { � 4 � 54n c w-e -)0 11c lucle, J' )a � u � r✓eu. T C� �3ilc�! S & We a 45 v Applicant's Signature Date. - I ild I� j v r 11 repo- LY.t.�X v y l er -e �fi�i y O4 V�/W u 1 fl / !%t �VI 4T/ wp� I WA"C--'j e �PL4aL4 t Q K cJ� � JvLt r'1l rla c'� c5 �Q� `r� � !•ZfiC !✓1 r�2� 4't- ii�%��lL�,c.�eti"� euej Wjac�4)� S C ,Ip P n p -K,4_ C-+LAAe_ , Lj -- aLA y AdOf1'� Lk4CR l 5p4t&t- v Public Lands Permit Application Page 2 of 2 Revised 611512021 L'U1'11 46)f- ht .eqrpHAei; c,- 40cult< 5Y su7"s `t4- c�) "4` Q 1,�r any 2663 2664 N L O r r U a c O N > W — — O I I J N C) v zk l z --oK �° 3 `o 0 1, r. • �; � � Q.� � � o N i M � d o N QL . ♦/ O LO ENT3w w w (6 UI 4 Y 0 6IN O= a: n � /V/�� J�� _ ►,� i N 00 • t0 Arm ti. ;1� E �- r �, o-row �4�r•cv +i hW'ial2pL"• i co o �Cp� o N f 2665 r.r- ��__ �',� `` "r 'Ar 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-0604 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: November 15, 2021 Re: November 23, 2021 Regular Agenda Item — MnSpect Contract Amendment for Professional Services Summary. Scott Qualle, on behalf of MnSpect, the City's designated Building Official, has submitted a contract amendment to provide building inspection and related services to the City of Mound until 2024. Mr. Qualle has submitted a staff memorandum to the City Council to provide details about the contract amendment and activities at MnSpect. Requested Action. A draft resolution of the City Council to approve the 2022-2024 contract amendment with MnSpect for professional services has been prepared. Staff recommends approval. / -o M N S P E C TLLC 235 First Street West • Waconia, MN 55387-1302 Memo To: Honorable Mayor Salazar & City Council From: Scott Qualle, Building Official Date: November 23, 2021 Re: Building Inspections Contract Renewal MNSPECT has been serving the City of Mound since 2005 as the Building Official. There have been several three-year contracts to cover that time. As our current contract is due to expire at the end of December, I respectfully offer the following contract amendment for your approval. Our responsibilities, level of service, contract term, and fees all remain the same as our last contract. I have removed the software charge for the next term, as our CommunityCore software is free of charge to our clients. All our staff & I enjoy serving the City of Mound and its residents, staff, and elected officials, and look forward to continuing to do so in the future. 2669 CONTRACT AMENDMENT Whereas the City of Mound (Municipality) has expressed an interest in retaining Inspector and Inspector is willing to provide continuing services, the parties hereby agree to the following changes to the existing contract dated November 13, 2018: 1. The termination date of the agreement shall be amended to December 31, 2024. 2. Section A, Item 5, Paragraph I, providing for a $75 fee, per seat, per month, for software services shall be removed from the agreement. Software provided after 12-31-21 shall be provided at no cost to the City. All other terms and conditions of the existing contract shall remain in effect. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement in duplicate this Twenty-third day of November, 2021. City of Mound Z MNSPECT, LLC Z Eric Hoversten, City Manager Scott Qualle, General Manager 2670 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 21- :1 *1611tIj I IQ 01Ie1»:16111 01 lrZfiel01111:LCit reUVi14 01ULVi14 01119701:a 101l;1 :2 X01IQ 011&11 4 NT/ IN *� WHEREAS, Chapter 105 of the Mound City Code, Building and Building Regulations, exists in part to promote the orderly development of the residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and public areas; and WHEREAS, the City is the responsible authority for issuing building permits and ensuring compliance with the official city code; and WHEREAS, the City has contracted with MNSPECT since 2005 for building inspection services; and WHEREAS, MNSPECT is well established with a good reputation and the necessary skills to conduct inspections. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a contract amendment with MNSPECT for inspection services with the following conditions: 1. The recitals set forth above are expressly incorporated herein. 2. The final form and content of the contract amendment shall be in substantially the same form as Exhibit A and shall be made subject to comments received from Staff and its consultants, including, but not limited to, the City Attorney and LMCIT, the City's insurance provider. 3. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the contract amendment, in substantially the same form as Exhibit A as well as all related documents. Adopted by the City Council this 23th day of November, 2021 Attest: Kevin Kelly, Clerk Mayor Raymond J. Salazar 2671 MIN an of Mouno _MIN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consultant Planner DATE: November 17, 2021 SUBJECT: Request for Substantially Similar Use Determination APPLICANT: Egyptian Parrot Pet Store OWNER: RGP LOCATION: Tenant Space in Commerce Place Shopping Center 2200-2238 Commerce Boulevard MEETING DATE: November 23, 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Mixed Use Downtown Lakes District ZONING: MU Mixed Use Downtown Summary As provided in City Code Section 129-71, the applicant, Egyptian Parrots Pet Store, submitted a request for a determination that a pet store/rescue facility is a "substantially similar use" to the list of uses in Mixed Use Downtown District which includes a category of "Retail' and "Pet and Veterinary Services" which are both included as permitted uses. The applicant proposes to lease tenant space in the shopping center to relocate their current pet store. Based on information from the applicant, their business specializes in parrots, small animals and some reptiles. Additionally, they also work with rescues to find homes for animals and pets. Their business includes 2 employees and also includes volunteer staff. RPG, the owner of the shopping center, has consented to the submitted request. 2672 Planning Commission Review and Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the substantial use determination request from the Mound Westonka Association to allow dry land conditioning in the Commerce Place Shopping Center at their November 16' meeting. Draft minutes have been prepared and included as an attachment to the Executive Summary. The applicant was present at the meeting and provided detail about his business which is primarily focused on birds which includes both sale and rescue activities but also includes small animals such as guinea pigs and hamsters and some reptiles. His business does not include dogs or cats. Staff commented on the regulations in City Code Chapter 114 (Animals) which includes a prohibition on the keeping and sale of non - domesticated animals. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the substantial use determination with the conditions and findings as recommended by Staff. Notification Wells Fargo (Mound) and the tenants in the Commerce Place Shopping Center were mailed a letter on November 17, 2021 to inform them of the City Council's consideration of the substantial use request at its November 23" meeting and that the request was being included on the Consent Agenda. Recommendation Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, the attached resolution has been prepared for your consideration. 2673 RESOLUTION NO. 21- RESOLUTON APPROVING REQUEST FROM ETGYPTIAN PARROT PET STORE FOR SUBSTANTIAL USE DETERMINATION FOR PROPOSED PET STORE/RESCUE IN TENANT SPACE IN THE COMMERCE PLACE SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 2200-2238 COMMERCE BOULEVARD WHEREAS, as provided in City Code Section 129-71, the applicant, Egyptian Parrots Pet Store, submitted a request for a determination that a pet store/rescue facility is a "substantially similar use" to the list of uses in Mixed Use Downtown District which includes a category of "Retail, General' and "Pet and Veterinary Services" which are both included as permitted uses. The applicant proposes to lease tenant space in the shopping center to relocate their current pet store. According to information from the applicant, the business specializes in parrots, small animals and some reptiles. Additionally, they also work with rescues to find homes for animals and pets. Their business includes 2 employees and also includes volunteer staff; and WHEREAS, RGP, the owner of the shopping center, consented to the substantial use request from the applicant for use of the tenant space; and WHEREAS, the Commerce Place Shopping Center is located at 2200-2238 Commerce Boulevard; and WHEREAS, details regarding the request contained in the Planning Report No. 21-17 reviewed at the November 16, 2021 Planning Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the substantial use request subject to conditions and including findings of fact; and WHEREAS, the substantial use request from the applicant was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its September 7, 2021 meeting who unanimously voted that the proposed use from the applicant is substantially similar to the "Retail, General' and "Pet and Veterinary Services" use categories that are listed as a permitted uses in the Mixed Use Downtown District and defined below: and "Pet and Veterinary Services" means facilities primarily engaged in the sale, grooming, retail of supplies or veterinary care of pets/non-agricultural animals, these uses do not include non -medical -related commercial boarding of animals (see Kennels). `Retail, General' means establishments engaged in selling goods or merchandise to the general public for personal or household consumption and rendering services incidental to the sale of the goods, examples include, but are not limited to: grocery, liquor, department variety, clothing, furniture, antique, gift drug, hardware, and book stores, news shops, flower shops, consignment shops and show rooms for retail. Incidental repair of items sold may be provided on site. Pawn shops and auction halls are not considered general retail. 2674 WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60-day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extensior and specifying how much additional time is needed. The City Council's decision on the application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the substantial use determination and does incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above to allow the proposed pet store/rescue to be located in tenant space in the Commerce Place Shopping Center is substantially similar to the current category of "Retail, General" and "Pet and Veterinary Services" which are included as permitted uses in the Mixed Use Downtown District regulations, based on the following findings: 1. The applicant is primarily engaged in the sale of pets/non-agricultural animals and supplies which is substantially similar to the sale of goods and pet activities identified in the definitions of retail, General and Pet and Veterinary Services. 2. Retail, General and Pet and Veterinary Services are permitted uses in the Mixed Use Downtown District. 3. The proposed pet store / rescue use supports the intended use of a mixed use downtown. The City Council's approval of the substantial use request is made subject to the following conditions: 1. No non -domesticated animals may be kept or sold on the premises in accordance with the City's animal regulations. 2. All animals shall be kept inside the premises unless being brought to the store for sale or rescue or after being sold to customers. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the zoning request. 4. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the substantial use determination is approved. 5. Applicant is responsible for contacting MnSpect, the City of Mound's Building Official and the Mound Fire Department to discuss the need for permitting and/or occupancy for the proposed space to be leased as it relates to the building and fire codes. Applicant shall submit all required information to undertake improvements in the building as part the future building permit application, as applicable. 6. A MCES Sewer Area Charge (SAC) evaluation for the proposed tenant space to be occupied for the proposed use, to include any possible grandfathered credits in the center, shall be require to be provided to the City of Mound in advance of any proposed remodeling/tenant improvement activities in the tenant space to be leased. 7. The applicant is required to obtain any and/or all required licensing and/or permitting required for keeping of animals on the premises and also transporting of live animals (i.e. health certificates, immunizations/ vaccinations, etc.). 2675 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, the City Council's approval of the substantial use request is based on information contained in the record including, but not limited to, the applicant's request, the Planning Report, the Planning Commission's review and recommendation and the Executive Summary. Adopted by the City Council this 23'' day of November, 2021. Mayor Raymond J. Salazar Attest: Kevin Kelly, Clerk MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND SPECIAL RESCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 16, 2021 Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Goode, Kevin Castellano, Jon Ciatti, Jake Saystrom, David Goode, Jason Baker, Jason Holt, Allen Andersen, Samantha Erickson Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jen Holmquist. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Baker to approve the agenda as distributed; seconded by Saystrom. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW OF OCTOBER 5, 2021 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Baker to approve the October 5, 2021 meeting minutes as written; seconded by Saystrom. MOTION carried unanimously. Planning Case No. 21-17 58 Review/recommendation of Review/recommendation of request for substantial use determination for proposed pet store / rescue facility in tenant space in Commerce Place Shopping Center, 2200-2238 Commerce Boulevard, is similar to "retail" and "pet and veterinary services" which are permitted in the Mixed -Use Downtown District Applicant: Egyptian Parrot Pet Store Smith outlined the planning case. She noted the Egyptian Parrot Pet Store requested the substantial use determination to relocate the business to Commerce Place Shopping Center. The pet store would be in the space previously occupied by the jeweler. Smith outlined that uses need to be either permitted or conditional or a substantial use determination must be done. Staff believes the proposed business is similar to "retail" and "pet and veterinary services." Smith noted that a retail designation is selling goods over the counter. Veterinary designation includes pet care and grooming. In addition to the retail use, the applicant's business also does rescue. The applicant specializes in birds and some small animals. Traditional domestic pets are not a part of the business model. 2677 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft City Code Chapter 114 dictates what kind of animals can be kept on premise and sold in the store and allowed in Mound. The owners of the building have consented to this business. Smith noted that it is the expectation that the business would be required to follow all guidelines and have all required licenses Smith stated that staff recommends that the use be deemed similar to retail and pet and veterinary services. Saystrom asked if there were any restrictions. For example, could they sell dogs? Smith said information from the applicant is that the animals are housed indoors and do not require outdoor space. They also need to follow the City's animal regulations. Smith noted the business model for this business is birds and small animals. Saystrom wondered if the approval of this use determination would permit someone else to do it in the future. Smith stated Staff would need to evaluate the needs for the keeping of dogs such as an outdoor run. Castellano noted one of the conditions in the Planning Report appears to restrict the sale of dogs/cats. Smith commented that one of the conditions state that non -domesticated animals may not be kept or sold. Mohamed Asan 1236 East 66 Street Richfield -He outlined that he is hoping for approval to move his pet store and rescue business to Mound and he welcomed questions from the commissioners. Ciatti asked how the rescue works and how the process starts. Mohamed stated there are a lot of exotics that are surrendered. Most traditional shelters don't take exotics so many of the animals have to be euthanized. Some of the animals come in injured or missing limbs. He believes this space will offer shelter to these unwanted and injured animals. His business mostly deals with birds but also some other smaller animals. They don't provide rescue for dogs and cats because there are already so many places that help with those. He stated he hopes that two boa constrictors be allowed on site as resident animals that will not be offered for adoption. He provides educational programs. He noted that breeders sell to anyone who has cash. His store/shelter has strict guidelines for who can adopt the animals. He will focus on the rescue when they move here. Erickson asked why they want to move here. He said the property fits perfectly with the vision in terms of size. Also, rents are cheaper here than where he currently is. Erickson stated that she appreciates the focus on rescue and being a bird owner, she knows that owners of exotic birds will drive just about anywhere to get what their birds need. She knows this will attract customers to Mound. Mohamed confirmed he has regular customers from out of state. He noted that birds choose the person. That's why they require several meet -and -greet visits prior to finalizing an adoption. If the bird is uninterested in the human, the adoption will not proceed. O Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Smith noted that the "resident snakes" that the applicant spoke of are not allowed to be kept on premises as it is not allowed under Mound's code. Smith explained that the current discussion is centered only on the business use under the zoning ordinance. Smith wanted the applicant to be clear that the snakes will not be allowed unless a specific code change is made to the animal regulations was approved and cannot be authorized with the substantial use evaluation process. Holt asked Mohamed if that is a deal -breaker. Mohamed said no. He hopes to have further conversations with staff regarding future change but that does not change his desire to relocate to Mound. Ciatti wondered if the snakes could be considered as a "licensed educational exhibit" that is allowed in the code. Smith explained that the intent of that language is to allow for animals that are a part of a circus or carnival exhibits that would be temporary within the city. Smith said the snakes will not be allowed as it would require an amendment to code. Mohamed reiterated that he hopes a future conversation can be had. Smith asked if health records are required for animals traveling over state lines. Mohamed answered only if the animal is classified as endangered. Goode asked for further questions. Hearing none, he thanked the applicant. MOTION by Baker to recommend approval of staff recommendation that the proposed pet store/rescue be deemed substantially similar use to "retail" and "pet and veterinary services"; seconded by Andersen. MOTION carried unanimously. 2679 4=J c O-m 4=J cr 0) CC O E Ln O +NJ Ln 4mJ CL LU QD cr- w w O z z A z z Q rl °/' 0 o ca 0 0 X U 0 Ca N Q N Q N O U Q .� O Q F- Q O v+,U •a ca •— Q L a4-JV) r.: N W v'1 m N L 07 N L N U Ca Q N N N L — O a--+ O Q _0 iJ a.., >� O ca O •N Ca N � U N Q O 0 \ Q N Q Lr) ca 0 ate-+ 00 O 1 (n N N _ O O ca O > o �? U +j N O r-I m E c�a — _0 •� �' r�4 O O O o V) V) 0 aJ • � O _ 4 N N (M cUn N N U- ca (M Q —0 _r_ O r .� O CL N +j i F L D ca •� M V) N O _ •q O a m = 2682 N u'f V 0 i J 4— O O .N 4-j Ln U .� +-+ ' a--+ N i Ln � U O E N E .m O Q _ .� .� OU � N c� go N cn — N 1 ca N 0 �N N E_��v 4 ca N O !E N }' O 3 .i � N O +j_0 O� N cn E ca � CT wQ c/) N a.., U O -0 U �O ca N _0 v v U+-j v 0-0 p � O -0-0 v v % Oblo v O C Ems, N ca _0 O p O � z U-0- o o O N m N C ■ r.: t]A >� O E _0N U O V).--� Q1 U 0 O V) cn cn > t D (10 � Uo � O a) V)c� N 0 Uo — O Q N Y U aJ O O `n cn O C: L0 d — cB cn i -0 Uo 0 bn �O 4A 0 Z O C: N Q O O Z3 Uo N U a)E N is a--+ a) E •C � O O U � O " . Q 0-0 Q) U— N Uo Q V) fB ' b — N Q)a--+ V) a) 4-j i Q , O � ate-+ Q)O = i U >` — — N N M O O N t]A O V) O O N� iii C N _- O . 40A O iro U -0O � O cn N O N O O N i lA U N Q) -t -0 •L ate-+ v N Q O •O Q O O fB L O E U V) V) V) O .L a L 3 v � v O tL cn it Q Iz +-+ fB Q vi a) � _ fB vi Z3 fB N -0 O U = ,�- a- J o a C: Opl on fQ 4 aJ O O bn — QJ N 4- Q) ca N U :5 �J U L Q) U L QJ E U v QJ Q N m v U V) Q) U QJ Ln cc QJ cc Q) d taA Q) _ V) C N vi X V) a, E a, .0 _0 +� i QJ Q) '> Q) X Ln E Cc U _ cc — cc cn v �_ N O O U Q1 Q QJ cn O to C: O Q1 � Q (c cc > V) V) — QJ O O i +� \ O 6 Q) � QJ `~ d QJ • — O 0 u Q) _0 N Q) O V)Q) — U ) (� i O c/) Q O a -0 i qA to Ln a' O > N N QJ U O >- C: p \ O Q 1 E -0 _ d c� O O N — N_ _0 O Zn M v C 0 O r- �� QN C7 p Q0 O O cn � cQ Q +� • M Q1 +3 O O Q�1 O H Ln 0 x Q O MIN ciiv of Mouno ®e PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consultant Planner DATE: November 12, 2021 SUBJECT: Request for Substantially Similar Use Determination APPLICANT: Egyptian Parrot Pet Store (Planning Case No. 21-17) OWNER: RGP LOCATION: Tenant Space in Commerce Place Shopping Center 2200-2238 Commerce Boulevard MEETING DATE: November 16, 2021 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Mixed Use Downtown Lakes District ZONING: MU Mixed Use Downtown Review Summary and Overview The applicant, Egyptian Parrots Pet Store, submitted a request for a determination that a pet store/rescue facility is a "substantially similar use" to the list of uses in Mixed Use Downtown District which includes a category of"Retail" and "Pet and Veterinary Services" which are both included as permitted uses. The applicant proposes to lease tenant space in the shopping center to relocate their current pet store. Based on information from the applicant, their business specializes in parrots, small animals and some reptiles. Additionally, they also workwith rescues to find homes for animals and pets. Their business includes 2 employees and also includes volunteer staff. RPG, the owner of the shopping center, has consented to the submitted request. 60-Day Land Use Application Review Process Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60dayperiod, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much additional time is needed. For the purpose of Minnesota Statute Section 15.99, "Day 1" is determined to be October 29, 2021, as provided by Minnesota Statute Section 645.15. The 60daytimeline expires unless an extension is executed by the City as provided by the statute. An extension of the review period under Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99 can occur if agreed to by the applicant. City Code Sec. 129-71 Allowed Uses (Excerpts) and Review Process (a) Limited. Only those uses specifically identified in this chapter as being allowed in a particular zoning district as a permitted use, conditional use, or accessory use are allowed within that zoning district, unless the City Council determines the use is substantially similar to an allowed use as provided in this section. (b) Substantially similar uses. The City Council recognizes there may be uses that are of a substantially similar type and have similar impacts as the uses the city has specifically named as being allowed within a particular zoning district. These substantially similar uses are essentially the some the named uses and so should similarly be allowed within the some zoning district. Therefore, the City Council determines it is reasonable to provide a process for an owner to seek a determination from the City Council as to whether a proposed use is allowed as being substantially similar to a use expressly allowed in the some zoning district without requiring the owner to seek a text amendment to this chapter. Without limiting the general prohibition of uses not specifically identified as being allowed in this chapter, an owner proposing to undertake a use the owner believes is substantially similar to an allowed use in the some zoning district may submit an application to the city for a determination on whether the proposed use is allowed. As part of the application, the owner shall describe the proposed use, identify the allowed use within the some zoning district as the owner's property is located the owner believes is substantially similar to the proposed use, and a description of why the uses are substantially similar. The city shall forward the complete application to the Planning Commission for review and a recommendation to the City Council. If the Planning Commission recommends a determination that the use is substantially similar to an allowed use, itshall also indicate whether the proposed use should be classified as a permitted use, conditional use, or accessory use within the zoning district. The City Council shall make the final determination on whether the proposed use is substantially similar to an allowed use and, if so, whether the use is allowed as a permitted use, conditional use, or accessory use. If allowed, the owner shall be required to apply for any required permits based on the City Council's classification of the use and any other applicable regulations. The city shall maintain a record of all uses the City Council determines are allowed as being substantially similar to named uses and will work to incorporate those uses into the appropriate list of allowed uses in this chapter. If the City Council finds a proposed use is not substantially similar to an allowed use, the owner may submit a separate application to seek an amendment to the text of this chapter to name the use as an allowed use within the zoning district. Notification A letter was forwarded by US Mail on November 10, 2021 to Wells Fargo Bank in Mound and the tenants in the Commerce Place Shopping Center to notify them of the Planning Commission's review of the request for a substantially similar use determination. Discussion • A zoning amendment was approved in 2018 which added new language into the City Code to address uses not listed in the zoning districts. The determination whether a use is a "substantially similar use" requires review by the Planning Commission and action by the City Council. As part of its recommendation, the Planning Commission is to evaluate whether the use should be classified as a permitted use or conditional use. If the City Council finds that the proposed use is not substantially similar to an allowed use, an applicant may submit a separate application to seek an amendment to the text of the Zoning Ordinance. Page 2 2687 • The City adopted new regulations in 2017 regarding certain animals (i.e. farm animals, exotics, etc.) and prohibits the keeping and selling of non -domesticated animals. This information has been shared with the owner and applicant. The excerpts from City Code Chapter 114 regarding non -domesticated animals are provided below: Sec. 14-19. Non -Domesticated Animals. Itshall be a violation of this Ordinance for any person to own, possess, harbor, intentionally feed, or offer for sale, any non -domesticated animal within the City, with the exception of non domesticated animals brought into the City as part of a veterinarian clinic, licensed show, or licensed exhibition. Non -domesticated animals feeding on naturally growing materials including gardens, landscaping, and other materials maintained as a mulch pile or from unmodified, commercially purchased bird feeders and birdseed shall be exemptfrom this Section. Sec. 14-1. Definitions. (1) Non -domesticated animal means those animals commonly considered to be naturally wild and not naturally trained or domesticated or which are commonly considered to be inherently dangerous to the health, safety, and welfare of people. Unless otherwise defined, non - domesticated animals shall include: 1. Any member of the large catfamily (family Felidae), including lions, tigers, cougars, bobcats, leopards, lynx, and jaguars, but excluding commonly accepted domesticated house cats; 2. Any naturally wild member of the canine family (family Canidae) including wolves, foxes, coyotes, dingoes, and jackals, but excluding commonly accepted domesticated dogs; 3. Any of the various species of farm animals including, but not limited to horses, cattle, mules, donkeys, goats, sheep, llamas, alpacas, potbellied pigs, pigs, or bees; 4. Any of the various species of farm poultry including, but not limited to chickens, roosters, ducks, geese, turkeys, peacocks, pigeons, swans, and doves; 5. Any member or relative of the rodent family, including any skunk (whether or notdescented), raccoon, squirrel, or chipmunk, but excluding Page 3 2688 those members otherwise defined or commonly accepted as domesticated pets; 6. Any poisonous, venomous, constricting, or inherently dangerous member of the reptile or amphibian families, including rattlesnakes, boa constrictors, pit vipers, crocodiles, and alligators; 7. Any other animal which is not explicitly listed above, but which can be reasonably defined by the terms of this section including, but not limited to bears, deer, monkeys, apes, game fish; or other animal as determined by the Community Development Director. A determination by the Community Development Director may be appealed to the City Council, by submitting a written requestfor City Council review and the basis for the appeal to the City Clerk, within 14-calendar days of the date the determination was made by the Community Development Director. • Hours of operations are: Tuesday -Friday 12:30pm - 6:00pm Saturday and Sunday 12:30pm- 5:00pm • Per information from the applicant, all of their animals are contained in enclosures/cages and housed indoors and refuse/waste will be collected and disposed of off property. The applicant has indicated there is no need for outdoor space. The applicant has stated that no permit is needed for the animals involved in their business and that the animals are checked by the breeders before they come to the store. • In 2021 the City adopted an updated use table and use definitions for the Mixed Use Downtown that includes the following definitions: o Pet and Veterinary Services means facilities primarily engaged in the sale, grooming, retail of supplies or veterinary care of pets/non-agricultural animals; these uses do not include non -medical -related commercial boarding of animals (see Kennels). Retail, General means establishments engaged in selling goods or merchandise to the general public for personal or household consumption and rendering services incidental to the sale of the goods; examples include, but are not limited to: grocery, liquor, department variety, clothing, furniture, antique, gift drug, hardware, and book stores, news shops, flower shops, consignment shops and show rooms for retail. Incidental repair of items sold may be provided on site. Pawn shops and auction halls are not considered general retail. Page 4 2689 Staff Recommendation Staff's evaluation is that the proposed pet store/rescue to be located in tenant space in the Commerce Place Shopping Center is substantially similar to the current category of "Retail" and "Pet and Veterinary Services" which are included as permitted uses in the Mixed Use Downtown District regulations, based on the following findings: 1. The applicant is primarily engaged in the sale of pets/non-agricultural animals and supplies which is substantially similar to the sale of goods and pet activities identified in the definitions of retail, General and Pet and Veterinary Services. 2. Retail, General and Pet and Veterinary Services are permitted uses in the Mixed Use Downtown District. 3. The proposed pet store / rescue use supports the intended use of a mixed use downtown. Staff recommends the minimum list of conditions be included as part of the Planning Commission's recommendation: 1. No non -domesticated animals may be kept or sold on the premises in accordance with the City's animal regulations. 2. All animals shall be kept inside the premises unless being brought to the store for sale or rescue or after being sold to customers. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the zoning request. 4. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the substantial use determination is approved. 5. Applicant is responsible for contacting MnSpect, the City of Mound's Building Official and the Mound Fire Department to discuss the need for permitting and/or occupancy for the proposed space to be leased as it relates to the building and fire codes. Applicant shall submit all required information to undertake improvements in the building as part the future building permit application, as applicable. 6. A MCES Sewer Area Charge (SAC) evaluation for the proposed tenant space to be occupied for the proposed use, to include any possible grandfathered credits in the center, shall be require to be provided to the City of Mound in advance of any proposed remodeling/tenant improvement activities in the tenant space to be leased. 7. No non -domesticated animals may be kept or sold on the premises in accordance with the City's animal regulations. 8. The applicant is required to obtain any and/or all required licensing and/or permitting required for keeping of animals on the premises and also transporting of live animals (i.e. health certificates, immunizations/vaccinations, etc.) Page 5 2690 City Council Consideration In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it is anticipated that the request will be considered by the City Council at an upcoming meeting with date to be determined with a tentative date of Tues., November 23, 2021 and alternate date of Tues., December 14, 2021. Page 6 2691 From: feather flock Parrot shop Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2021 10:52 PM To: Sarah Smith Subject: Re: Commerce Place: New Possible Tenant Good morning Sarah, Animal list: Birds: Parakeets, cockatiels conures, and finches. For Small Animals: Hamsters, Gerbils, Guinea pigs, Rabbits and sometimes Chinchillas, occasionally we get Reptile: Bearded drangons, and lizards. We Contact the poultry division, Animal Control and the FDA Before bringing any animal or product into our shop. We currently have two active employees. Prior to Covid we had four. The space we're interested in is roughly about 3,000 square feet. Half the space will be dedicated to our rescue pets. The other half will be our retail shop. Bird and small animal waste can be put in the trash and will be taking to another trash facility. Please let me know if you have any other questions. Thank you From: feather flock Parrot shop Sent: Thursday, October 28, 20214:32 PM To: Sarah Smith Subject: Re: Mound City Code Excerpts -Allowed Use / Substantial Use Hello Sarah Smith, Egyptian Parrot Petshop: We're a local Mom and Pop petshop with a passion for animals. We Specialize in birds and small animals. We also work with alot of Rescues to find animals homes. Last two months alone we found homes for 13 bunnies, 20 guinea pigs and 4 hamsters that were surrounded. Some were found outside. We believe that every animal deserves a chance and every animal deserve a home they pick. We have staff and volunteers that help with our animals around the clock. Our bird have a sleep schedule and they usually will sleep at night once the lights are off. We're a family friendly petshop and focus on education of animals over making a quick sale. Every animal we sell or adopt out. We have long process. where the customer must make am effort to come in multiple times to build a connection. If we don't see the connection from both side we will not adopt or sell out pets. We have outstanding reviews on Google and Facebook.we pride ourselves in customer service and knowledge. We have customers that travel to us from all over Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, North Dakota and a few other nearby states. Were the only Specialize Parrot shop in Minnesota. Only reason we're leaving out current location is due to the rent price increase. So we hope your able to approve us for that space thank you 2692 4ff�H+I+Hi�`0 IIIIIIIIIIIII 16 3 �`- 4 5 6 WELLS FARGO . 1 BANK r :._- ------- - f: i 7 8 9 10 1p 2693 O& MENK Real People. Real Solutions. November 17', 2021 Mr. Eric Hoversten, City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2019 Street & Utility Project City Project No. PW-19-01 Pay Request No. 5 & Final Dear Mr. Hoversten: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: (952) 448-8838 Fax: (952) 448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 5 & Final from Kusske Construction for work completed on the 2019 Street & Utility Project from January 1st, 2021 through November 1st, 2021. Work to date includes punchlist items such as driveway pavement repairs & gate valve adjustments along with a 10% contractor markup on subcontractor work for miscellaneous pavement patches directed by the City of Mound. We have reviewed the estimate, verified the quantities, and recommend final payment to the contractor in the amount of $6,212.95. The detail for this amount is attached. At this time, the project is complete. The total on this estimate includes the release of previously withheld retainage Please contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Brian D. Simmons, P.E. City Engineer Bolton & Menk is an DATE: 11 /1 /2021 CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 2019 STREET & UTILITY PROJECT CITY PROJECT NOS. PW-19-01 BMI PROJECT NO. C17.117633 FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 5&FINAL 1/15/2021 THROUGH 11/1/2021 CONTRACTOR KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION OWNER City of Mound ENGINEER Bolton & Menk TOTALAMOUNT BID............................................................................................................................................................................ $ 254,480.00 APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS.................................................................................................................................. $ 19,916.43 CURRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT................................................................................................................................ $ 274,396.43 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE...................................................................................................................................... $ 332,888.38 TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE..................................................................................................................................... $ - DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED............................................................. $ - TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS................................................................................................................. $ 332,888.38 RETAINEDPERCENTAGE ( 0% )................................................................................................................................... $ - TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS........................................................................................................................... $ - NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE...................................................................................................................... $ 332,888.38 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES........................................................................................................................... $ 326,675.43 PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO. 5&FINAL................................................................................................................................. $ 6,212.95 Certificate for Final Payment I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been complied with and that all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured. Contractor: Kuss onstruction 2 Bavaria ane Chaska, MN 531 By P'-e- s� Name ( Title Date CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: BOLTON & MENK, INC., ENGINEERS, 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318 By T��55-- , PROJECT ENGINEER Brian D. Simmons Date 2021-11-17 APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: Owner: CITY OF MOUND By Name Title Date 2695 rirrrAm PROJECT., CONTRACTOR: 11/1/2021 FGEPARH. H:WOUMCL711"1633V"1 C®4ew mAEPa ApphmtovsV[l 17633 Pay App ANPFG&UNAL REQUEST FOR PAYMENT 2019 STREET & UTILITY PROJECT KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION REQUESTNO.: 5&FINAL ITEM NO. BID ITEM ORIGINAL BID COMPLETED BID UNIT QUANTI UNIT PRICE THIS MONTH TO DATE QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 $12 501 00 1.00 $12,501.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 $6 325 00 1.00 $6,325.00 3 LANDSCAPE ALLOWANCE ALLOWANCE 1 $6 500 00 0.17 $1,105.00 4 CLEARING AND GRUBBING LUMP SUM 1 $4,02500 1.00 $4,025.00 5 CLEAR A GRUB TREE EACH 5 $92000 4.00 $3,680.00 6 REMOVE WATERMAIN LIN FT 80 $2500 126.00 $3,150.00 7 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SOLD 80 $500 49.00 $245.00 8 REMOVE CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALK SOFT 533 $175 260.00 $455.00 9 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 280 $500 397.00 $1,985.00 10 REMOVE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EACH 1 $1 330 00 1.00 1 $1,330.00 11 REMOVE GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 3 $17500 4.00 $700.00 12 MILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SOLD 2025 $375 2025.00 $7,593.75 13 REMOVE PAVERS SOFT 94 $2000 94.00 $1,880.00 14 REMOVE MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL LIN FT 40 $2000 40.00 $800.00 15 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CU YD 28 $30 00 21.00 $630.00 16 STABILIZING AGGREGATE (CV) CU LID 28 $5500 21.00 $1,155.00 17 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SOLID 70 $300 61.00 $183.00 18 STANDARD STREET PATCH SO YD 264 $50 00 459.00 $22,950.00 19 COUNTY ROAD PATCH SOLD 86 $11000 123.00 $13,530.00 20 15" TYPE SP95 WEAR ING COURSE (SPWEA240B) (2360) SOLD 2025 $1180 2,025.00 $23,895.00 21 MOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 280 $50 00 397.00 $19,850.00 22 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SOLD ]] $4000 49.00 $1,960.00 23 6" CONCRETE WALK AND DRIVEWAY SOFT 587 $900 68.00 $612.00 24 CONCRETE PAVERS SOFT 94 $2500 112.00 $2,800.00 25 MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL LIN FT 40 $18000 53.00 $9,540.00 26 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EACH 2 $1,60000 3.00 $4,800.00 27 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EACH 10 $1 375 00 12.00 $16,500.00 28 AGGREGATE BEDDING TON 48 $4700 54.00 $2,538.00 29 UTILITY VERIFICATION POTHOLE INCL. RESTORATION (STD. STREET PATCH) EACH 2 $2,68500 30 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE LUMP SUM 1 $7,86500 1.00 $7,865.00 31 6" NOM. C900 PVC WATERMAIN DR 18 (PIPE BURST) LIN FT 505 $78 00 460.00 $35,880.00 32 6" C900 PVC WATERMAIN LIN FT 80 $50 00 101.00 $5,050.00 33 6" DIP WATERMAIN, CL 52 LIN FT 30 $70 001 60.00 $4,200.00 34 1°WATER SERVICE LIN FT 280 $5000 298.00 $14,900.00 2696 rirrrAm PROJECT., CONTRACTOR: 11/1/2021 FGEPARH. H:WOUMCL711"1633V"1 C®4ew mAEPa ApphmtovsV[l 17633 Pay App ANPFG&UNAL REQUEST FOR PAYMENT 2019 STREET & UTILITY PROJECT KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION REQUESTNO.: 5&FINAL ITEM NO. BID ITEM ORIGINAL BID COMPLETED BID UNIT QUANTI UNIT PRICE THIS MONTH TO DATE QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT 35 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 10 $390 00 10.00 $3,900.00 36 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 10 $360 00 12.00 $4,320.00 37 WATER SERVICE LID COVER EACH 3 $280 00 38 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 3 $1,65000 3.00 $4,950.00 39 HYDRANT EACH 1 $6 760 00 1.00 $6,760.00 40 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS (WATERMAIN) POUNDS 387 $1050 662.00 $6,951.00 41 ADJUST GATE VALVE & BOX EACH 2 $450 00 2.00 1 $900.00 42 CHIMNEY SEAL EACH 3 $46000 3.00 $1,380.00 43 INLET PROTECTION EACH 3 $13000 3.00 $390.00 44 TOPSOIL BORROW(LV) CULD 25 $5500 32.00 $1,760.00 45 so0, TYPE LAWN so LID140 $18 00 293.00 $6,274.00 COAL BIOLOG LINFT 500 $300 500.00 $1,500.00 CO#2 MAINLINE 10 WATERMAIN AT COMMERCE/SHERWOOD LUMP SUM 1 $15 336 19 1.00 $15,336.19 CO#3 SANITARY SEWER SEPARATION FOR #5574&#5510 SHERWOOD DRIVE LUMP SUM 1 $3,08024 1.00 $3,080.24 EWAT NEW SANITARY CASTINGS LUMP SUM 1 $222900 1.00 1 $2,229.00 EWA2 ADDITIONAL WEAR COURSE— STREET PATCH LEVELING LUMP SUM 1 $7500 00 1.00 1 $7,500.00 EWA3 WATERMAIN BREAK PATCHES LUMP SUM 1 $29 132 001 1.00 $29,132.00 EWA4 WATERMAIN BREAK PATCHES(10% CONTRACTOR MARKUP) LUMP 1 $291320 1.00 $2,913.20 1.00 $2,913.20 TOTAL AMOUNT $332,888.38 2697 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: Submitted Date and Time: Legal Name: Federal Employer ID: User Who Submitted: Type of Request Submitted: Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: Minnesota ID: Project Owner: Project Number: Project Begin Date: Project End Date: Project Location: Project Amount: Subcontractor Summary 1173032960 6177718 CITY OF MOUND PW-19-01 01-Apr-2020 16-Nov-2021 SHERWOOD DRIVE $332,888.38 0-705-405-600 16-Nov-2021 9:22:35 AM KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION CO LLC 41-0988665 JasonKusske Contractor Affidavit Name ID Affidavit Number PARK CONSTRUCTION 8139310 2103828480 GROUNDSCAPES 5366456 2145193984 G. F. JEDLICKI INC 7579212 2064060416 HUSKY CONSTRUCTION 5047998 604835840 Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll -free) 800-657-3594, or (email) with holding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Monday - Friday. Please print this page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. WIN < HUSKY CONSTRUCTION Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: 0-329-491-104 Submitted Date and Time: 15-Nov-2021 4:01:58 PM Legal Name: HUSKY CONSTRUCTION Federal Employer ID: 81-5485445 User Who Submitted: aprilboogren Type of Request Submitted: Contractor Affidavit Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: 604835840 Minnesota ID: 5047998 Project Owner: CITY OF MOUND Project Number: SHERWOOD DRIVE UTILITY IMP Project Begin Date: 05-Apr-2020 Project End Date: 03-May-2020 Project Location: MOUND Project Amount: $2,137.50 Subcontractors: No Subcontractors Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us 2699 If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 65'1 -282-9999, (toll - free) 800-657-3594, or (email) with hold ing.tax@state.nnn.Us. Business hours are 8:00 a.m. - 4:30pm. Monday - Friday, 11 Con tact Taxpayer Privacy & UI Rights Security Use of [ink |nfUr|naLiOD Policy Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: Submitted Date and Time: Legal Name: Federal Employer ID: User Who Submitted: Type of Request Submitted: Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: Minnesota ID: Project Owner: Project Number: Project Begin Date: Project End Date: Project Location: Project Amount: f 1-505-996-064 29-Oct-2020 11:42:13 AM PARK CONSTRUCTION CO 41-0466820 cburke Contractor Affidavit 2103828480 8139310 CITY OF MOUND 20308 15-May-2020 15-Jul-2020 SHERWOOD DRIVE MOUND $85,260.00 Subcontractor Summary Name ID Affidavit Number MID STATE RECLAMATION INC 1719563 1645076480 Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll -free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding. tax@state.mn. us. Business hours are 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Monday - Friday. Please print this page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. 2701 ffignOm- From: ROB SIEVERS <groundscape6900@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 8:10 AM To: Jason Kusske Subject: Fwd: Your Recent Contractor Affidavit Request IC134 for the Mound project. Thank you, Megan ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: MN Revenue e-Services <eservices.mdor@state.mn.us> Date: Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 8:06 AM Subject: Your Recent Contractor Affidavit Request To: <groundscape6900@gmail.com> This email is an automated notification and is unable to receive replies. Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: 0-918-364-832 Submitted Date and Time: 11-Nov-2021 8:06:33 AM Legal Name: GROUNDSCAPE ENTERPRISE INC Federal Employer ID: 81-4895852 User Who Submitted: Ground Enter Type of Request Submitted: Contractor Affidavit Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: 2145193984 Minnesota ID: 5366456 Project Owner: CITY OF MOUND Project Number: 0 Project Begin Date: 11-May-2020 Project End Date: 30-Oct-2020 Project Location: MOUND Project Amount: $12,563.90 Subcontractors: No Subcontractors Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us 1 2702 If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll -free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Monday - Friday. How to View and Print this Request You can see copies of your requests by going into your History. This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain nonpublic / private data. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. 2 2703 Jason Kusske From: Linda Zahler <Linda@gfjedlicki.com> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 1:59 PM To: Jason@KusskeConstruction.com Subject: FW: Your Recent Contractor Affidavit Request Hi Jason, Please see IC134 for Mound Sherwood below. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thank You, lwa R7 Office Manager, Trenchless Div. 612/328-4979 lnda@gfjedlicki.com G. F. Jedlicki, Inc. 2471 Galpin Ct. #110 Chanhassen MN 55317 From: MN Revenue e-Services <eservices.mdor@state.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 1:57 PM To: Linda Zahler <Linda@gfjedlicki.com> Subject: Your Recent Contractor Affidavit Request [External Sender] This email is an automated notification and is unable to receive replies. Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: Submitted Date and Time: Legal Name: Federal Employer ID: User Who Submitted: Type of Request Submitted: Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: 2064060416 Minnesota ID: 7579212 Project Owner: CITY OF MOND 0-893-108-896 11-Nov-2021 1:55:55 PM G F JEDLICKI INC 20-2149889 GFJedlicki Contractor Affidavit 1 2704 Project Number: Project Begin Date Project End Date: Project Location: Project Amount: Subcontractors: 202OR004 15-Apr-2020 30-Apr-2020 CITY OF MOUND $11, 620.00 No Subcontractors Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll -free) 800-657-3594, or (email) with hold inq.tax(a_state.mn.us. Business hours are 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Monday - Friday. How to View and Print this Request You can see copies of your requests by going into your History. This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain nonpublic / private data. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. 2 2705 rAL pirvoFmoomn ®a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting Planners DATE: November 18, 2021 SUBJECT: Three Points Mixed Use Node (Case No. 21-16) Public Hearing— Rezoning and review/discussion/consideration of Comprehensive Plan Amendment MEETING DATE: November 23, 2021 Summary The City Council is being requested to consider a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning of two properties, totaling 0.59 acres, on Three Points Boulevard between Eagle Lane and Finch Lane. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment would reguide the parcels from Medium Density Residential to Mixed Use. In addition, the properties would be rezoned from B-3 Neighborhood Business to Mixed Use Corridor. The proposed amendment and rezoning are the result of the City's Zoning Code Update project and not being initiated due to a proposed redevelopment project. Public Hearings The City Council will be holding a public hearing for the request rezoning. Notification about the public hearing followed state requirements. The notice of public hearing was published on November 13, 2021 in the Laker. The noticewas posted on the City Hall bulletin board on November 9, 2021 and posted on the Cites website. A public hearing notice was also mailed to all affected property owners and those who own property within 350 feet of properties that are being rezoned on November 4, 2021. Ordinance Porting The draft ordinance was posted on the City bulletin board and City website on November 10, 2021. 2706 Planning Commission Review and Recommendation The Planning Commission considered the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning at their November 16' meeting which included a public hearing. The Planning Commission had also discussed the potential rezoning of the properties at their September 7tn and October 5th meetings. Minutes from the October 5th meeting and draft minutes from the November 16' meeting have included. Packet materials from the September 7th and October 5th Planning Commissioners have been not been included but will be provided upon request. The only members of public in attendance at any of the meetings related to this matter were Steve Schoop and Nancy Rigelhof, property owners at 5084 Three Points Boulevard, who had requested reconsideration of the original proposal to rezone the properties to R-2 Two Family Residential. The property owners expressed concern about the proposed rezoning to residential as it would limit the future use of their property. Currently their property, and the neighboring one at 5098 Three Points, are used for both commercial and residential purposes. The property owners attended the November 16' meeting and expressed support for the comprehensive plan amendment and proposed rezoning. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning. The few commissioners who were not in support of the proposed motions indicated that they did not support the change as they did not believe mixed use was appropriate in this location. It was noted that even if the property were to be zoned residential the property owners would be able to use their site in its current configuration into the future. The rezoning to residential would better limit future use of the site to what they would consider to be appropriate. Supplemental Materials Included in the packet are Staff's presentation slides. Recommendation Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendations for approval, the attached ordinance and resolution have been prepared for your consideration. 2707 11/18/2021 Three Points Mixed Use Node Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning Site Location • Three Points Blvd between Eagle and Finch Lanes • 0.59 acre site with two properties • Current use is commercial and residential 2708 11/18/2021 Request • Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide properties from Medium Density Residential to Mixed Use • Rezoning from B-3 Neighborhood Commercial to Mixed Use - Corridor Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Mixed Use is meant to support a variety of commercial, residential, and public uses • Areas with mixed use designation have a one page description of the intent, character, and approach to mixed use (see proposed draft to right). • Proposed density of 7 to 12 units per acre is the same as existing medium density residential designation L 2040 2' Future Land Use L Map City of Mound Zonin \ g � �! u 1 Map i 41 P F-q 2709 2 11/18/2021 Rezoning to Mixed Use Corridor District • The Mixed Use Corridor District (MU-C) is established to allow for the continued mix of retail, services, office, residential, civic, institutional and recreational land uses. This district's physical character is intended to be similar to the Mixed Use Downtown District with pedestrian friendly site and building design but with less intensity due its corridor nature and adjacency to residential neighborhoods. • Allows for continued use of structures (using applicable C-1/R-2/R-3 standards) • New structures would follow MU-C standards and require a PUD PC Review and Recommendations • Considered at their September 711, October 511 and November 1611 meetings • Held a public hearing for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Recommended adoption of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning 2710 3 11/18/2021 City Council Consideration • Hold the public hearing for the proposed rezoning • Consider the resolution for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and ordinance for rezoning 2711 4 CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -2021 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MOUND OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO CHANGE THE ZONING DISTRICT FOR 5098 THREE POINTS BOULEVARD AND 5084 THREE POINTS BOULEVARD FROM B-3 NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT TO MU-C MIXED USE — CORRIDOR DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Mound ordains: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Mound hereby amends the Mound Official Zoning Map by changing the zoning district boundaries for the following properties, as listed below: Properties being rezoned from B-3 Neighborhood Business District to MU-C Mixed Use — Corridor District: PID Address 13-117-24-12-0020, 13-117-24-12-0021, 13-117-24-12-0022, 5098 Three Points Blvd 13-117-24-12-0017, & 13-117-24-12-0018 13-117-24-12-0019 5084 Three Points Blvd SECTION 2. This ordinance becomes effective on the first day following the date of its publication, or upon the publication of a summary of the ordinance as provided by Minn. Stat. § 412.191, subd. 4, as it may be amended from time to time, which meets the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 331A.01, subd. 10, as it may be amended from time to time. Adopted by the City Council this 23'' day of November, 2021. Mayor Raymond J. Salazar Attest: Kevin Kelly, Clerk Published in the Laker the of 2021. Effective the day of 2021. 1 2712 RESOLUTION NO. 21- RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REGUIDE PROPERTIES AT 5084 AND 5098 THREE POINTS BOULEVARD THREE POINTS BOULEVARD FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO MIXED USE AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL PLANNING CASE NO. 21-16 WHEREAS, the City has identified the properties for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to better accommodate existing and future uses on the site; and WHEREAS, the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment would reguide the following property as follows: PID Number Property Address Acres Current 2040 Comp Plan Proposed 2040 Comp Plan 13-117-24-12-0020, 13-117-24-12-0021, Three Medium 13-117-24-12-0022, Poin Points Blvd P 0.44 Density Mixed Use 13-117-24-12-0017, Residential & 13-117-24-12-0018 5084 Three Medium 13-117-24-12-0019 Points Blvd 0.15 Density Mixed Use Residential ; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 462, Section 355, Subdivision 2 of the Minnesota State Statutes, the Planning Commission held an official public hearing on November 16, 2021, to allow formal public comment on the proposed comprehensive plan amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the matter at its November 23, 2021, meeting and recommended approval of the aforementioned comprehensive plan amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and conditionally approve the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the properties at 5098 Three Points Boulevard and 5084 Three Points Boulevard, and hereby authorizes Staff to submit a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council, subject to the following conditions: 1. No future approval of any land use or subdivision application is included as part of this action. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 2713 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this approval is subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council. Adopted by the City Council this 23'' day of November, 2021. Attest: Kevin Kelly, Clerk Mayor Raymond J. Salazar 2714 MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND SPECIAL RESCHEDULED PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 16, 2021 Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Goode, Kevin Castellano, Jon Ciatti, Jake Saystrom, David Goode, Jason Baker, Jason Holt, Allen Andersen, Samantha Erickson Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jen Holmquist. BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 21-16 Public Hearing - review/recommendation of proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for properties at 5084 and 5098 Three Points Boulevard to reguide from residential to mixed use; also review of proposed rezoning from B-3 neighborhood business to mixed use for properties at 5084 and 5098 Three Points Boulevard Applicant: City of Mound Trapp presented the proposal to amend the Comprehensive Plan to reguide the subject properties from residential to mixed use and rezone from B-3 neighborhood business to Mixed Use Corridor. Trapp stated that Minnesota state statute requires that the comprehensive plan and the zoning map be in conformance with each other. That is why the applications are being brought to the commission concurrently. The designation of the properties for medium density residential occurred during the 2040 Comprehensive Plan planning process. The property owners of the subject property requested staff reconsider and reguide the node to mixed use. The comp plan amendment would reguide the area from residential to mixed use. That guidance is meant to support a variety of commercial, residential and public uses. It is also intended to provide flexibility for property owners. A proposed one -page summary was provided to show the intent and considerations of the proposed mixed use area. Future redevelopment will have to follow the direction established in the comprehensive plan. 2715 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Rezoning to Mixed -Use Corridor is appropriate for the size and scale of properties in question. Mixed -Use Corridor allows for a mix of retail, services, office or residential uses but is intended to be less intense due to its corridor nature and adjacency to residential neighborhoods. This allows the current structures to follow existing standard while new development would require a PUD and adherence to the Mixed Use Corridor standards. A public hearing is required for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Notices were sent but no comments were received prior to the meeting. Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the rezoning. Goode asked if the commissioners had questions or comments. Hearing none he opened the public hearing. Nancy Riglehoff - 3780 Enchanted Lane. She noted that she is the property owner at 5084 Three Points Boulevard and that she is in favor of the current proposal for mixed use. Goode asked for any other comments. Hearing none, he closed the public hearing. MOTION by Baker to recommend the City Council approve the proposed 2040 Comprehensive Plan Amendment for properties at 5084 and 5098 Three Points Boulevard to reguide from residential to mixed use corridor; seconded by Erickson. MOTION carries. Commissioners who voted against the motion were asked for any comments they would want to share with the City Council. Andersen thinks the property owners' interest could be met without the Comprehensive Plan amendment and doesn't think it's necessary to stray from the approved Comprehensive Plan. Castellano states his nay vote was for the same reason. MOTION by Baker to recommend the City Council approve the rezoning of the subject properties from B-3 neighborhood business to MU-C mixed use corridor. Seconded Ciatti. MOTION carries. Commissioners who voted against the motion were asked for any comments they would want to share with the City Council. Andersen and Castellano — Both Commissioners voted as such for the same reasons stated above. 2716 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Trapp noted that the City Council public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, November 23, 2021. Smith added that Metropolitan Council staff have preliminarily indicated that this is an administrative change. Upon City Council approval, the proposal will be sent to the Metropolitan Council staff. Once they process the change, the City will prepare a resolution to formally approve the amendment and put the amendment into effect. Then the rezoning would move forward. 2717 MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 5, 2021 Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Goode, Kevin Castellano, Jon Ciatti, Jake Saystrom, David Goode, Jason Baker, Drew Heal, Jason Holt, Allen Andersen, Samantha Erickson Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jen Holmquist. Members of the public: Steve Shoop and Nancy Rigelhof-3780 Enchanted Lane, Minnetrista, Ed Rockwell-4888 Edgewater Drive, Mound APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Baker to approve the agenda as distributed; seconded by Saystrom. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW OF SEPTEMBER 7, 2021 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Baker to approve the September 7, 2021 meeting minutes as written; seconded by Heal. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS PC Case No. 21-07 - Review/recommendation of proposed amendments to City Code Chapter 129 (Zoning Ordinance) and Zoning Map for consistency with 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Note: Tabled text amendments and proposed rezoning of property at 5084 Three Points Blvd from September 7, 2021 meeting) Applicant: City of Mound Trapp presented zoning code updates. She outlined the status of the Part 1 updates of the rezoning process and reminded the commissioners about the topics that had been tabled at the last meeting. One item that was tabled was the proposal for 6 properties in the vicinity of Three Points Blvd and Finch Lane to be rezoned to R-2 for consistency with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Comp Plan guides this area as medium density residential. The area was guided as such because the surrounding area is all residential and the scale of the properties in only about 25,000 sq. ft. for all 6 properties combined. The area is near the end of the Three Points peninsula. The 2718 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft commercial uses have varied over the history of the property. The property owners of one of the properties had requested a decision be delayed so they could discuss the proposed rezoning with the Planning Commission. Trapp outlined discussions staff had with the attorney and the assessor's office. The assessor confirmed that the properties are currently being assessed at two rates, residential and commercial. The City Attorney stated that rezoning is a legislative act. We can't make choices based on maximum profit or value for a property owner. Trapp explained the rezoning is required to make this area consistent with the guidance in the comp plan. The comp plan guides this area as residential. If a recommendation that is consistent with the comp plan is not reached to re -zone as proposed, the area will need to be changed to C-1 as the current B-2 zoning will no longer exist due the other zoning updates that were recently recommended for approval. In addition, if there is a desire to retain the properties as commercial the comprehensive plan will need to be amended for consistency, per state statute requirements. Castellano asked about notices sent. Trapp says for this particular property, only the property owners were notified in advance of the last meetings. Surrounding properties will be notified as part of the formal public hearing process. Goode asked for clarification on the recommendations sought. Trapp noted R-2 is the residential option and is how the area is guided in the approved 2040 Comprehensive Plan, C-1 is the commercial option, and the comprehensive plan would need to be amended, in addition to the zoning code. Baker asked if all 6 properties need to be the same or if they could be split. Trapp explained that the entire node should be treated similarly given its size. In addition, "spot zoning" is not favorable. Trapp confirmed the properties are assessed as both residential and commercial, with the parking lots being commercial. Rezoning the area will not prevent the properties from continuing the current commercial use. Goode asked the audience for comment. Nancy Rigelhof and Steve Shoop-3780 Enchanted Lane. They own the property at 5084 Three Points Blvd. Shoop stated that the property is not positioned at the end of a dead-end street. The road does end at a dead end, but is blocks away from his property. The property has always been a commercial property. It was built, as such. He believes the shop part of the property was never intended to be residential. He noted the rezoning is the city's decision and this is not something they requested. He explained that they want to keep it as is. Shoop said the tenants at the other properties are not local and he wonders if they have even read the notices or dug into the details. 2719 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Goode asked what the current use is. Shoop stated the property includes a small apartment building and the commercial space is used as hobby space and he runs a painting and wallpaper business from the building. He said part of the report stated the property is not being used to its full potential and he believes this change will take away the option. He believes the property is unique. He recognizes it's a residential area all around it but he has never had any issues with the residential neighbors around him. He noted that one B-3 property in the city has been changed to Commercial. He hopes the commissioners will recommend his property remain commercial. Baker noted that the current use can continue and he asked if the intent is to sell it as a commercial building. Shoop says he hopes to continue to use it, as is, and then he would sell it, as a commercial property, eventually. Andersen asked if they brought up these concerns when the 2040 Plan was being developed. Rigelhof stated they were not notified at that stage. The first they knew of it was in August when they got the letter. Ciatti asked if there is an option for the area to have a residential and commercial zoning, or if they must be one or the other. Trapp said if the commission decided to allow both, Staff would suggest it be in the Mixed -Use Corridor District and that, like the C-1 District, would require a Comprehensive Plan amendment because the area was identified as residential in the comp plan. Castellano asked for clarification on the use. Zoning the properties as R-2 will be consistent with the comp plan as approved and the owners can continue to use the property exactly as they are. Trapp confirmed. The property can continue as is, and a new owner could continue to use it for commercial use as long as the new use is similar in terms of scale. i.e. number of employees, or customers. The intensity of the commercial business could not increase. This can continue indefinitely unless or until the use is changed to residential for a period of at least one year. It would not have the option to go back to a commercial use if that were to happen. Goode asked for clarification, if it is currently used as a painting and wallpapering business would a new owner have to use it as a painting and wallpapering business? Trapp said a different kind of business would be allowed, it would just need to be similar in scale. For example, it is likely that the City would determine that a restaurant or coffee shop is not the same scale. Goode pointed out that the Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council and council will be the final vote. C-1 and Mixed -Use Corridor will require a comp plan amendment. Mixed use would have architectural standards placed on any new development. 2720 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Baker asked what the setbacks would be if it were a residential parcel. Would a house even conform to setbacks without a variance? Smith offered that front setbacks are standard 20 feet, side setbacks, if a garage is included, are 6 feet, rear is 15 feet, and one side setback must be 10 feet if there is no garage. Baker noted that on this lot it would be a very small house. Trapp confirmed. Saystrom asked if the property is zoned C-1 and someone wanted to build a house, would that be a permitted use. Trapp said no. Saystrom noted the flexibility the property owners are looking for would only be available with the Mixed -Use Corridor district. Erickson wondered if the loss of value has been researched and if not, she thought the property owners could try to gather that information to show the City Council. Trapp noted that the city is unable to gather that info. Goode invited the residents back to make comment. Rigelhof noted that she hopes to make it mixed -use. Shoop believes the value is in the uniqueness of the property. He feels like something is being taken from them because the city is simplifying the zoning code. He noted the current taxes are split between residential and commercial, which is higher due to the commercial. Trapp noted that the consolidation of the B-1, B-2 and B-3 districts has no bearing on what is being proposed for this property. The zoning changes are all happening at the same time. The reason this node is being rezoned is so that the City can make the zoning consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Holt wondered how difficult it is to change to mixed use. Trapp noted a Comprehensive Plan amendment requires Met Council approval. She doesn't anticipate that the Met Council will have issues, it will just take staff time and resources and stall the process a little. Trapp suggested that the City should do whatever is the right thing and asked the commissioners not to factor the amount of work that would need to be done into their decision. Ciatti pointed out that resident feedback on recent proposals has been "we want commercial" he believes the mixed use may be appropriate. He thinks encouraging local business in town would be in line with what residents say they want. MOTION by Holt to recommend the City Council rezone the property to Mixed Use Corridor; seconded by Ciatti. Yay- Ciatti, Saystrom, Baker, Erickson, Goode Nay -Heal, Andersen, Castellano Commissioners who voted against the motion were asked for any comments they would want to share with the City Council. 2721 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Castellano stated that even with the rezoning to residential the current use can continue as is. He doesn't believe the surrounding residents would want a Mixed -Use - Corridor in this area. He also doesn't see a reason to stray from the comp plan, especially considering the location within a residential neighborhood. Andersen stated he thinks it's important to follow the guidance that is already approved in the comp plan. Since the current use can continue and because a bigger business can't go in there, he thinks its an unnecessary stray from the comp plan. Heal stated he agrees with Castellano and Andersen's comments and additionally he believes it's an odd place for a business to be. He believes there is a place for commercial and a place for residential and commercial doesn't seem to fit here. Because the current use may continue, he believes it should be R-2, as guided by the comp plan. 2722 Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: November 16, 2021 SUBJECT: Public Hearing- Proposed Amendment to City Code Chapter 42 (Nuisance) MEETING DATE: November 23, 2021 Summary. At its Tues., November 23, 2021 meeting, the City Council will hold a public hearing to consider a proposed amendment to City Code Chapter 42 (Nuisances) related to lighting/glare. The purpose for the proposed amendment into incorporate new language in the Citg's nuisance ordinance related to lighting. Presently, Mound City Code Code Sec. 129- 318 discusses lighting and glare in all zoning districts and is specifically defined below: Sec. 129 318. Glore. In oil districts, ony lighting used to illuminate on off- street parking Dreg, sign, or other structure, shall be mmnged so Ds to deflect light Dwgy from Soy adjoining residential zone or from the public streets. Direct or sky reflected glare, wherefrom floodlights or from high tempergture processes such Ds combustion or welding, shall not be directed into Soy adjoining property. The source of lights shall be hooded or controlled in some monner so Ds not to light get Decor property Bore incandescent light bulbs shall not be permitted in view of adjacent property or public right of-woy. Any light or combination of lights which cost light on D public street shall not exceed onefoosondie (meter reading) Ds megsured from the centerline of said street Any light or combination of lights which cost light on residential property shall not exceed 0.4 footcondle (meter reading) Ds megsuredfrom said property line. The proposed amendment was prepared by the City Attorney following the City Council's discussion of the current regulations that took place at its July 13th meeting related to a recurrent lighting matter. In summary, the Council requested new language be added to the Cites nuisance regulations. A link to the July lath City Council meeting minutes is provided by clicking below: https://webserver.citvofmound.com/Web Link/DocView.aspx?id-99393&dbid=0&repo= CitvOfMound 2723 Process. While the proposed ordinance amendment is non -zoning in nature, the process for formal review and consideration of the amendment is the same process used for a zoning text amendment, as described in City Code Sec. 129-34, which requires formal review by the Planning Commission and a public hearing be held by the City Council following publication and posting of the public hearing notice, a minimum of 10 days prior to the scheduled hearing; also posting of the draft ordinance on the City website as required by statute. The draft ordinance was also on the City Hall lobby bulletin board. Members are advised that all required publication and posting requirements to hold the public hearing have been satisfied. Planning Commission Review. The proposed ordinance amendment was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the proposed amendment at its October 5, 2021 meeting. The Planning Commission voted to recommend City Council approval. The minute excerpts from the October 5tn Planning Commission meeting have been included for information. Attachments. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. = 2021 AMENDING CHAPTER 42 (NUISANCES) OF THE MOUND CITY CODE REGARDING PUBLIC NUISANCES AFFECTING PEACE AND SAFETY • Memorandum dated July 8, 2021 from City Manager Eric Hoversten regarding City Code as it relates to lighting/glare included in July 13, 2021 City Council meeting agenda packet Page 2 2724 MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 5, 2021 Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Goode, Kevin Castellano, Jon Ciatti, Jake Saystrom, David Goode, Jason Baker, Drew Heal, Jason Holt, Allen Andersen, Samantha Erickson Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jen Holmquist. Members of the public: Steve Shoop and Nancy Rigelhof-3780 Enchanted Lane, Minnetrista, Ed Rockwell-4888 Edgewater Drive, Mound APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Baker to approve the agenda as distributed; seconded by Saystrom. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW OF SEPTEMBER 7, 2021 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Baker to approve the September 7, 2021 meeting minutes as written; seconded by Heal. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS PC Case No. 21-11 - Review/recommendation of proposed amendment to City Code Chapter 42 (Nuisances) related to lighting Applicant: City of Mound Smith outlined the history relating to lighting and glare. Lighting is covered in zoning but these matters can take place as a nuisance. Council directed staff to look at the regulations and add additional lighting/glare language in the nuisance code. This is not a zoning amendment. No notices are required. But the city attorney recommends we should have a hearing, publish the notice and post it on the website in a zoning -like process. Smith outlined how neighboring properties will be notified if this amendment is recommended. Smith fielded questions regarding specific language in the proposal. She stated the language was provided by city attorney and could be revised. 2725 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Ciatti asked if this change would make this issue enforceable by police. Smith responded that if this goes into effect it would be a misdemeanor enforceable by the City Attorney. Holt said he visited the example site and he passed a photo. Heal asked what bay this particular home is on. Holt declined to answer specifically but said it is quite bright. Smith confirmed only that it is lighting casting over water. Ed Rockwell-4888 Edgewater Drive. He stated he is a neighbor of the example property. He specified the light in question is on a commercial light pole about 20 feet from the lake and directed over the water. He said a cousin that lives across the bay can read a book by the light. He noted the light is on every day about 30 minutes after sunset and stays on until 3 in the morning. Erickson asked if Rockwell has spoken to the owner of the light. The resident confirmed he has attempted to speak to him but he was met with hostility. Rockwell's cousin has also attempted to discuss it with the owner of the light, but she was met with hostility. He believes city staff has had conversation with him and also got nowhere. He hopes the city code can be changed so they can enjoy their own property. He added they have been dealing with this for at least 8 years. MOTION by Baker to recommend City Council approval of the proposed amendment to City Code Chapter 42; seconded by Erickson. MOTION carried unanimously. 2726 PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO BE ACTED UPON NOV. 23, 2021 AT THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING (POSTED 11-09-21) 10-5-2021 Planning Commission Recommended Draft CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE -2021 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 42 (NUISANCES) OF THE MOUND CITY CODE REGARDING PUBLIC NUISANCES AFFECTING PEACE AND SAFETY WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 412.221, subd. 23, the City of Mound (the "City") is afforded with express authority to define nuisances and provide for their prevention and abatement via ordinance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 412.221, subd. 32, the City is also afforded with the express authority to adopt ordinances that provide for the protection of public and private property, the benefit of residence, and the promotion of health, safety, order, convenience, and the general welfare of its residents; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of its powers outlined above, and together with any additional powers that may be afforded to it under law, the City desires to define within its nuisance regulations practical and effective measures by which the obtrusive aspects of excessive and careless light usage that affects the nighttime environment in certain locations can be minimized, while preserving safety, security and the nighttime use and enjoyment of property; and WHEREAS, to that end, the measures contained in this ordinance are intended to curtail the degradation of the nighttime visual environment by requiring lighting practices that direct appropriate amounts of light where and when it is needed and decrease the wastage of light and glare resulting from over -lighting and poorly shielded or inappropriately directed lighting fixtures. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Mound does ordain: Section 1. Section 42-4 (Nuisances Affecting Peace and Safety) of the Mound City Code is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 42-4. Same —Affecting peace and safety. safety: The following are declared to be public nuisances affecting public peace and 1 2727 PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO BE ACTED UPON NOV. 23, 2021 AT THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING (POSTED 11-09-21) 10-5-2021 Planning Commission Recommended Draft Any lighting used to illuminate an off-street parking area, structure, or area that is not arranged to deflect light awav from anv adjacent residential property or away from any public right-of-way or navigable body of water in accordance with the following provisions: (a) the light source shall be hooded or controlled so as not to shine light toward adjacent property: and (b) floodlights or spotlights must be aimed no higher than 45 degrees above straight down (halfwav between straight down and straight to the side). This subsection (26) shall not apply to (a) lighting within public property, right-of-way or easement for the principal purpose of illuminating public facilities, streets or highways: (b) lighting for public monuments, statues, and flagpoles: (c) lighting solelv for signs, provided that all lights aimed at a sign must have all the light hit the sign (or be blocked by a shield/hood) and should shine from above instead of from below when practical: (d) temporary lighting for theatrical, television, performance areas, civic events, and construction sites; (e) underwater lighting in swimming pools and other water features: M lighting that is onlv used under emergencv conditions: (2) lighting specified or identified in a City -approved permit; (h) lighting required by federal, state, county or citv ordinances and regulations: (i) lighting for outdoor events: (j) seasonal lighting and related holidav decorations: (k) lighting required for the safe takeoff and landing of aircraft; (1) solar landscape lights; (m) indoor lighting: (n) lighting in a garage: (o) lighting not permanently affixed or installed on a proyerty, handheld lighting, or lighting mounted on a functional vehicle; and (p) lights mounted on functioning farm buildings or used for active agriculture practices if used with a motion sensor. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance becomes effective on the first day following the date of its publication, or upon the publication of a summary of the ordinance as provided by Minn. Stat. § 412.191, subd. 4. Adopted by the City Council this 23`d day of November, 2021 Attest: Kevin Kelly, Clerk Published in the Laker the Effective the day of Mayor Raymond J. Salazar of 2021. 2021. (ikeett indicates matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.) 2 2728 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-0604 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: November 15, 2021 Re: November 23, 2021 Regular Agenda Item — Property Owner Request to Name Channel / Public Water Adjacent to Property at 5395 Baywood Shores Drive Summary. The City has received an inquiry from Carey and Dara Lifson, the property owners at 5395 Baywood Shores Drive, about naming the channel/public water way adjacent to their property. Their recommended name is "Golds Cove" to commemorate their grandparents, the Golds, who were involved in the original dredge of the area. This name was also discussed by the owners with MnDNR. Process. The regulations for naming a lake, river, stream or other natural geographic feature in Minnesota is guided by Minnesota Statues 83A.02 - 83A.07. The process requires the submittal of a petition signed by 15 registered voters in the involved county and that a public hearing be held by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. Prior to commencement of the required process included in statute, Staff spoke with Peter Boulay from the MnDNR who recommended the City Council evaluate the naming request and provide this information to the MnDNR and Hennepin County before the formal process is started. Notification. Property owners per Hennepin County tax records were provided written mailed notice of the naming request on November 12, 2021. As of this writing, no comments or concerns were received. Requested Action. A draft resolution of the City Council to authorize submittal of property owner request from Carey and Dara Lifson to name the channel / public water way ("Golds Cove") adjacent to their property at 5395 Baywood Shores Drive has been included for consideration/action. Staff recommends approval. 2729 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 21- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITAL OF PROPERTY OWNER REQUEST TO NAME THE CHANNEL/PUBLIC WATER ADJACENT TO THEIR PROPERTY AT 5395 BAYWOOD SHORES DRIVE TO THE MNDNR AND HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TO COMMENCE THE FORMAL PROCESS IN MINNESOTA STATUTES 83A.02 - 83A.07 WHEREAS, the City of Mound received an inquiry from Carey and Dara Lifson, the property owners at 5395 Baywood Shores Drive, about naming the channel/public water way adjacent to their property; and WHEREAS, the recommended name from the property owners is "Golds Cove." The name is requested to commemorate of the grandparents of the property owners, the Golds, who were involved in the original dredge of the area; WHEREAS, the property owners have discussed the name with the MnDNR; and WHEREAS, the regulations for naming a lake, river, stream or other natural geographic feature in Minnesota is guided by Minnesota Statues 83A.02 - 83A.07 and requires the submittal of a qualified petition and that a public hearing be held by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners; and WHEREAS, prior to commencement of the required process in statute, it was recommended by MnDNR Staff that the City Council evaluate the naming request and provide this information to the MnDNR and Hennepin County in advance of the future public hearing to be scheduled; and WHEREAS, property owners per Hennepin County tax records were provided mailed notice on November 12, 2021 that the City Council would be considering the naming request at its November 23, 2021 meeting; and WHEREAS, as of November 18, 2021, no comments or concerns were received regarding the renaming request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City Council hereby authorizes submittal of the property owner request from Carey and Dara Lifson to name the channel / public water way ("Golds Cove") adjacent to their property at 5395 Baywood Shores Drive to the MnDNR and Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to begin the formal process in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 83A.02 - 83A.07. 1 2730 2. All activities related to the public water naming process shall be the responsibility of the property owners. Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of November 23, 2021 Attest: Kevin Kelly, Clerk Mayor Raymond J. Salazar 2 2731 2732 RESTORATION AGREEMENT This estoration Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into as of this � day of 2021 b and , y between the city of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the ty"), and James Lang, a single person ("Lang"). The City and the Lang shall be referred to collectively herein as the "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, Lang is an owner of certain real property located at 2396 Commerce Boulevard in the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally described on the attached Exhibit A (the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Property contains a single commercial building, with the exterior of the building facing Commerce Boulevard and the sides of the building lying on the applicable property lines with no setback (the "Building"); WHEREAS, on November 25, 2020, pursuant to an administrative search warrant, a physical inspection of the Property and the Building's exterior and interior was conducted by the City's Building Official. The City's Building Official prepared a report dated December 6, 2020 a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference, which includes, but is not limited to, the following allegations: (1) water intrusion causin dama e and deterioration of exterior framing and structural inte ri g g additions, (3) unsound flooring and collapsing wallgs in'a uildi ng points and failures in Building the front door, (5) visible light in the interior of the Building due to sdd cion, (4) water damage to intersections, (6) evidence of water intrusion and failures in roof structures ceil n ures at wall/roof possible asbestos -containing materials, (8) holes in structural basement walls, regumad floors, (7) created for doorways, (9) soil removal in the crawlspace that compromises the stabilbly roughly and floors, (10) temporary and non -stable structural supports, (11 failed h ity of walls foundation failure in one corner of the Building with dirt eroding throu h the eat plant, (12) (13) failing roof conditions in numerous locations causing water infiltratio amaged block wall, significant trash and debris in the rear of the Pro e nand damage, (14) foundation that has moved several inches and failed p �' (15) significant failures, including a chimney is not sealed, allowing water intrusion and 117 the al addition to the Building, (16) the above the Building and unprotected electrical wires; ( ) presence of dangerous power lines RESTORATION AGREEMENT t4 is Restoration Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into as of this % day of ?: • , 2021, by and between the city of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the' "City"), and James Lang, a single person ("Lang"). The City and the Lang shall be referred to collectively herein as the "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, Lang is an owner of certain real property located at 2396 Commerce Boulevard in the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally described on the attached Exhibit A (the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Property contains a single commercial building, with the exterior of the building facing Commerce Boulevard and the sides of the building lying on the applicable property lines with no setback (the "Building"); WHEREAS, on November 25, 2020, pursuant to an administrative search warrant, a physical inspection of the Property and the Building's exterior and interior was conducted by the City's Building Official. The City's Building Official prepared a report dated December 6, 2020, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference, which includes, but is not limited to, the following allegations: (1) water intrusion causing damage and deterioration of exterior framing and structural integrity, (2) failing joints and failures in Building additions, (3) unsound flooring and collapsing walls in a Building addition, (4) water damage to the front door, (5) visible light in the interior of the Building due to structural failures at wall/roof intersections, (6) evidence of water intrusion and failures in roof structures, ceilings and floors, (7) possible asbestos -containing materials, (8) holes in structural basement walls, presumably roughly created for doorways, (9) soil removal in the crawlspace that compromises the stability of walls and floors, (10) temporary and non -stable structural supports, (11) failed heat plant, (12) foundation failure in one corner of the Building with dirt eroding through the damaged block wall, (13) failing roof conditions in numerous locations causing water infiltration and damage, (14) significant trash and debris in the rear of the Property, (15) significant failures, including a foundation that has moved several inches and failed, in the final addition to the Building, (16) the 2734 chimney is not sealed, allowing water intrusion and (17) the presence of dangerous power lines above the Building and unprotected electrical wires; WHEREAS, based on the conditions discovered during the aforementioned inspection, the City Building Official has determined that (1) the Building and Property are "hazardous," as defined by Minnesota Statutes, section 463.15, and (2) both the exterior and interior portions of the Property are in violation of numerous provisions of the Mound City Code (the "City Code"); WHEREAS, the City contends that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, chapter 463, the City is authorized to initiate formal legal proceedings to require that Lang abate the Property's hazardous and unsafe conditions and, in the event that Lang fails to do so, the City is further provided with the statutory authority to facilitate said abatement on its own and assess the Property for the cost thereof, WHEREAS, Lang disputes the City's contentions regarding the Property and allegations the Building is structurally sound, the allegation by the City Building Official may be repaired and a decision to demolish the Building is unwarranted: WHEREAS, the City has stated it desires to avoid demolition of the Building, Lang desires to establish a framework to repair the building without admitting or denying the City's contentions: WHEREAS, Lang, with the assistance of a City resident and neighboring property owner, has retained and engaged a professional engineer and construction company to perform inspections, make recommendations and issue reports that establish that the Building and the Property can be abated and the Building can be improved in a manner that will meet the City's zoning and building regulations and any and all other applicable City regulations, as set forth in the City's Code of Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the Parties have jointly prepared the construction and improvement schedule set forth in this Agreement, and by entering into this Agreement, the Parties wish to jointly facilitate the abatement and improvement of the Property's and Building's alleged hazardous conditions set forth above and avoid legal proceedings; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises set forth in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged by the Parties, the Parties hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Recitals. The Parties agree that the foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated into this Agreement. 2. Performance. So long as Lang complies with the terms of paragraph 3 of this Agreement, the City agrees that it will not issue an order for abatement as authorized in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 463 and that it will not initiate formal legal proceedings in civil court. If Lang fails to 2 2735 comply with the terms of paragraph 3 of this Agreement and is determined to be in default as set forth in this Agreement, then he agrees that the City may immediately perform any outstanding work specified in this Agreement and assess its costs as set forth in paragraph 7 of this Agreement. Lang also agrees that the City may opt to remove the Building instead of performing the outstanding work if it is deemed by the City to be more cost-effective to do so. 3. Abatement and Improvement of the Build. a. Removal of Trash and Debris. Lang, at his own cost and expense, agrees to remove the debris and trash outside the Property and trash inside the building and generally clean the building on or before March 31, 2021. Lang authorizes the City to inspect the Property on or before April 15, 2021 to ensure that the debris and trash has been removed from the Property. b. Plans. On or before April 30, 2021, Lang shall submit architectural plans for the Building's repair ("Improvements"). The plans will be prepared by a registered architect who will become the architect of record for the project. The plans will become Exhibit C of this Agreement upon approval of building permits as set forth below. The City agrees to cooperate with Lang and to use its best efforts to timely approve the permits required. Delay in the City's approval process shall result in deferral of the events set forth below by the days of delay and shall constitute extension of required completion and not result in a default under this Agreement. C. Planning and Zoning. On or before May 30, 2021, Lang shall submit all zoning requests required in support of the Improvements. This Agreement is neither a substitute nor a waiver of the City's planning and zoning application and review process and Lang will be solely responsible for obtaining necessary planning and zoning approvals required for the proposed uses and Improvements. The City agrees to cooperate with Lang and to use its best efforts to timely approve the permits required. Delay in the City's approval process shall result in deferral of the events set forth below by the days of delay and shall constitute extension of required completion and not result in a default under this Agreement. d. Repair and Improvements. On or before June 30, 2021, Lang shall obtain a building permit to complete construction of the Improvements. Lang shall substantially complete all work for the Improvements and obtain a certificate of occupancy on or before December 31, 2021. The City agrees to cooperate with Lang and to use its best efforts to timely approve the permits required. Delay in the City's approval process shall result in deferral of the events set forth below by the days of delay and shall constitute extension of required completion and not result in a default under this Agreement. e. Permits, Approval and Inspections. This Agreement is neither a substitute for nor a waiver of the City's permitting and inspection requirements. Lang or his contractor(s) will obtain all necessary permits for the work on the Property. To obtain a building permit, Lang will need updated plans for the Improvements that 2736 meet current City Code. If Lang meets the conditions to obtain a permit, the City will not withhold or otherwise interfere with the Lang's ability to obtain a building permit. All plumbing permits will require a state plumbing licensed contractor. All electrical permits will require a state licensed electrical contractor. All mechanical permits will require a city licensed mechanical contractor. Any and all alterations of the property will comply with City Code requirements. Lang will allow the City access to all areas of the Property for the inspections. The City agrees to cooperate with Lang and to use its best efforts to timely approve the permits required. Delay in the City's approval process shall result in deferral of the events set forth below by the days of delay and shall constitute extension of required completion and not result in a default under this Agreement. 4. Default. The following events shall constitute an event of default by Lang: a. Failure by Lang to timely perform the work set forth in section 3(a)-(d) above, subject to unavoidable delays beyond Lang's control, including, but not limited to, delays in material and equipment deliveries, labor or equipment shortages, and weather conditions that interfere with completion, within 30 days after receipt by Lang of notice thereof by the City, or such longer period of time as may reasonably be required to cure such default provided Lang is proceeding with diligence to do SO. b. Failure by Lang to obtain a certificate of occupancy for the Property on or before December 31, 2021. 5. Remedies on Default. In the event of default which is not excused or timely cured the City may take any one or more of the following actions: a. The City may suspend its performance under this Agreement until it receives assurances from Lang, deemed adequate by the City, that Lang will cure his default and continue his performance under the Agreement. b. The City may initiate such action, including legal or administrative action, whether in law or in equity, as is necessary for the City to perform the work for the Improvements or recover any amounts due under this Agreement from Lang, or recover any damages sustained by the City as a result of Lang's default. C. This Agreement is a license by Lang for the City to enter the Property and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek an order from any court for permission to enter the Property for such purposes. If the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, exercise any authority available to it to recover its costs by a levy of special assessments against the Property to be paid over a period of ten (10) years. 4 2737 6. No Occupanc%. Lang agrees that no new certificate of occupancy has been issued for the Property as of the date of this Agreement. Lang will not allow any other people to occupy the Building on the Property without a certificate of occupancy being issued. Until a new certificate of occupancy has been issued for the Property, Lang may continue to use the Property as he has in the past ten years provided Lang shall not conduct retails sales to the general public from the Property or personally use the Property as his residence. 7. S ecial Assessment of Costs and Expenses, Waiver. The City is authorized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 463.21 and 463.22 to assess the expenses that it incurs as a result of its enforcement of the City issuing a legally valid Order in the event of default by Lang including specifically, but not exclusively, demolition or repair costs, disposal costs including costs to remove items from the Property, other costs to remove the hazardous conditions on the Property, filing fees, service fees, publication fees, reasonable attorneys' fees, witness fees and traveling expenses (the "Expenses"). In the event of default by Lang and if the City has to perform work as outlined in Paragraph 3(a)-(d) of this Agreement, then Lang, for himself and his successors and assigns, hereby waives the right to object to the City's assessment of 100 percent (100%) of the Expenses incurred by the City. Lang hereby further waives his right to appeal the levy of the special assessment pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081, or reapportionment thereof upon land division pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.071, subdivision 3; and further specifically agrees with respect to such special assessment against the Property that: a. Any requirements of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, with which the City does not comply are hereby waived by Lang with respect to the City's Expenses; b. The increase in fair market value of the Property resulting from the work will be in an amount at least equal to the total cost for the work undertaken under Paragraph 3(a)-(d) and assessed to the Property, and that such increase in fair market value is a special benefit resulting from said work; C. Lang's waiver of his right to object to the City's assessment of 100 percent of the Expenses against the Property as outlined above so long as it is reasonable, fair and equitable and there are no other properties against which the Expenses should be assessed; and d. Such special assessment shall be payable in up to ten (10) annual installments starting in the year 2022, with interest at the annual rate of four percent (4%) accruing from the date of the assessment hearing. 8. Waiver of Claims. If the City has to perform work as outlined in Paragraph 3(a)-(d) of this Agreement, Lang agrees to waive any claims against the City, its officials, employees, contractors, and agents from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages, expenses, claims, actions, or judgments, including reasonable attorneys' fees which they, or their agents or contractors may hereinafter sustain, incur, or be required to pay, arising out of or by reason of this Agreement, except for personal injury, gross negligence, intentional behavior, and or actions arising from wanton disregard for the property or personal rights of Lang. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver by the City of any immunities, defenses, or other limitations on liability to 5 2738 which the City is entitled by law, including but not limited to the maximum monetary limits on liability established by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 or otherwise. Should the City, complete any of the work as outlined in Paragraph 3(a)-(d) of this Agreement, the Lang waives any and all claims against the City for the removal or destruction of any and all personal items, provided, however that Lang shall receive advance written notice at least 10 days before any removal and be allowed to enter and remove such property. As part of this waiver, Lang knowingly acknowledges and agrees that none of the items that remain on the Property, after the agreed -upon removal date, need to be salvaged or sold, and, accordingly, the City may dispose of said items and need not make any attempt to salvage or sell said items. The City may not keep any said items, nor give them to any of its employees or agents. 9. Hazardous Building Action. By entering into this Agreement, the City agrees that it will not issue an order for abatement or initiate legal proceedings in court against Lang regarding the Property and Building's allegedly hazardous condition, unless the there is an event of default not cured as provided herein. 10. General Provisions. This Agreement, including the recitals, exhibits attached hereto, and the documents incorporated herein by reference, contains the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes in all respects all prior agreements of the Parties, whether written or otherwise, with respect to the Property and the Building. No change, modification or waiver of any provisions of this Agreement will be binding unless it is in writing and signed by both Parties. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of the state of Minnesota. 11. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in multiple counterparts, each of which, when so delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument and agreement. 12. Run with the Land. The provisions of this Agreement shall run with the land and be binding upon the Parties and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns. 13. Recordin . The City may record this Agreement against the Property in the land records of Hennepin County. It is the intent of the Parties that this Agreement is in a form which is recordable among the land records and the Parties agree to make any changes to this Agreement as may be necessary to effectuate the recording and filing of this Agreement against the Property. 14. Severabilih'. If any term, provision, or condition contained in this Agreement shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement (or the application of such term, provision, or condition to persons or circumstances other than those in respect to which it is invalid or unenforceable) shall not be affected, and each term, provision, or condition of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 15. Compliance with Laws and Regulations. In performing all obligations contained herein, the Parties must abide by all applicable federal, state, and local statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations. 2739 16. Termination of Agreement. This Agreement shall terminate upon the earlier date of either (a) Lang's satisfactory completion of the work set forth in paragraph 3, or (b) upon certification of the assessment of all costs associated with any work completed by the City if Lang fails to perform the work set forth in paragraph 5. Upon termination of this Agreement based on (a) of this Paragraph, the City shall thereafter execute and deliver such documents, in recordable form, that are necessary to extinguish the rights hereunder. Upon termination of this Agreement based on (b) of this Paragraph, the City shall have the ability to pursue all available legal remedies with respect to the hazardous conditions on the Property including but not limited to seeking a court order to demolish the dwelling. 17. Attorney Representation. The Parties acknowledge that they have been represented by counsel in connection with the execution of this Agreement and intend that no rules construing provisions of this Agreement against the position of the drafter shall be applied. The Parties further represent and declare that in executing this document they have relied solely upon their own judgment, belief and knowledge, or the advice and recommendation of their own independently selected counsel, and that they have not been influenced to any extent whatsoever in executing this document by any representations or statements except those expressly contained or referred to in this Agreement. [SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW] 2740 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed in their names and on their behalf on or as of the dates indicated herein. THE CITY: By: r t ymond f-*6aidr, Mayor Eric Hoversten, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this H y of � , 2021, by Raymond J. Salazar and Eric Hoversten, the mayor and city manager, res ectively, of the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the city. MLLEM WIE KAE M ITS (Votary Public -Minnesota My COTn WM EWM JM 31, 2= Notary Public 2741 By: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before by James Lang, a single person. THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy &Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 r �� of r 1 � , 2021, me this I day HOLLY S P�NTICOFF NOTARY PUBLIC-�u11NNESOTA My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2022 c) EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Lot 14, McN aught's Addition to Mound Lake, Minnetonka A-1 2743 EXHIBIT B Building Official Administrative Search Warrant Report (attached hereto) B-1 2744 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE SEARCH WARRANT Based upon the application of Scott Qualle for an administrative search warrant to enter the structures on the Property at 2396 Commerce Boulevard in the City of Mound, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota (the "Property") and pursuant to Chapter 105 of the Mound City Code and Minnesota case law: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Scott Qualle, the Building Official; Andrew Drilling, the City of Mound's Field Services Officer; and a police escort may enter the above -described Property for the purpose of inspection in order to enforce the Mound City Code, and may conduct an interior and exterior inspection, take photographs and perform other such duties as are necessary to enforce the Mound City Code and may hold said evidence in custody according to law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Scott Qualle, the Building Official, and Andrew Drilling, the City of Mound's Field Services Officer, may at the time of inspection, inspect the interior and exterior of the structures on the Property in the City of Mound, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to determine and document the existence and extent of the violations of City Code. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that said entry shall take place on a regular business day between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. and includes entry onto the above -described Property including the interior and exterior. If the Owner, A. Williams Trustee, or the Taxpayer, James Lang, of the Property is absent or resist at the time of the execution of this warrant, said entry may be effected by using reasonable force in the least intrusive manner. 2745 Dated: Judge of District Court Bartolomei, Lui 2020.11.13 i• -06'01 554295vi MU200-205 2746 '. I I Brick & lath failure on west side VVoU Fai|ure—Southxvest corner Framing & sheathing deterioration atsouthwest corner Stock Photo Northwest corner 2750 STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT APPLICATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SEARCH WARRANT AND SUPPORTING AFFIDAVIT Scott Qualle (the "Applicant"), being first duly sworn, hereby applies to this Court for an administrative warrant to enter upon and inspect the grounds of the property located at 2396 Commerce Boulevard in the City of Mound, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota (the "Property"). The Property contains a single commercial building, and the exterior of the building facing Commerce Boulevard and the sides of the building lie on the applicable property lines with no setback. Applicant Qualle is the Building Official for the City of Mound. The Applicant is authorized to seek an administrative search warrant pursuant to the Mound City Code, Section 42-5 and 105-1. Applicant Qualle is familiar with the Property and has personally observed the exterior of the Property on prior occasions, as has Applicant Qualle's colleague. In particular, Applicant Qualle and his colleague observed dilapidation of the exterior including holes in the exterior walls of the structure, opportunities for water intrusion into the structure, an unsecure door and broken windows. Furthermore, based on Applicant Qualle's observations, the structure on the Property have been unoccupied and unused for up to 15 years and a "do -not -occupy" order was issued on May 19, 2011. Because the structure is not weathertight and has not been occupied for approximately 15 years, Applicant Qualle has significant concern about the safety and integrity of the building, floors, and structural frame. I. Current and Suspected Code Violations, and Need to Inspect Exterior and Interior of the Property A. Mound City Code, Chapter 105 (Buildings and Building Regulations) 1 2751 The City of Mound ("City") established the office of the Building Official in section 105- 1 of Chapter 105 of the City Code of Ordinances ("Code"). The same section vests the Building Official with the authority and obligation to enforce Chapter 105 of the Code and to achieve such enforcement through notices, tickets, or citations in lieu of criminal penalties. The Building Official also enforces the State Building Code ("SBC") and the 2000 International Property Maintenance Code ("IPMC") pursuant to Articles II and IV of Chapter 105 of the Code. 1. State Building Code The SBC is adopted by the City by reference. City Code § 105-21(c). The SBC provides the building official with the authority to inspect properties to enforce the code when the official has reasonable cause to believe a violation of the code exists that make the structure or premises unsafe. Minn. R. 1300.0110. "If the structure or premises is unoccupied, the building official shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or other person having charge or control of the structure or premises and request entry. If entry is refused, the building official shall have recourse to the remedies provided by law to secure entry." Id. Further, the SBC dictates that a "building or structure ... is unsafe, for purposes of this part, if it is structurally unsafe, not provided with adequate egress, a fire hazard, or otherwise dangerous to human life." Minn. R. 1300.0180. Finally, under the SBC, all building and structures "shall be maintained in a safe and sanitary condition." Minn. R. 1300.0225. 2. 2000 International Property Maintenance Code The IPMC is "the property maintenance code of the city." City Code §§ 105-131. Chapter 3 of the IPMC addresses general requirements of property maintenance. Section 301.3 of the IPMC, requires that "[a]ll vacant structures and premises thereof or vacant land shall be maintained in a clean, safe, secure and sanitary condition as provided herein so as not to cause a 2 2752 blighting problem or adversely affect the public health or safety." Section 302.1 of the IPMC also requires that all exterior property and premises be "maintained in a clean, safe and sanitary condition." The IPMC requires that the exterior of a structure be maintained in good repair, structurally sound and sanitary. IPMC Sections 303.1 and 303.2. Similarly, the IPMC states that exterior walls "shall be free from holes, breaks, and loose or rotting materials; and maintained weatherproof..." IPMC Section 303.6. Windows must also be kept in good condition and weather tight. IPMC Section 303.13. Exterior doors and door assemblies and hardware must be maintained in good condition. IPMC Section 303.15. B. Prior City Communications Hennepin County records identify the owner of the Property as A. Williams Trustee ("Owner"), and the Property is commonly known as 2396 Commerce Boulevard, Mound, Minnesota, 55364 and legally described as: LOT 14, MCNAUGHT' S ADDITION TO MOUND LAKE, MINNETONKA The taxpayer for the Property as identified by Hennepin County is James Lang, 5671 International Parkway, New Hope, MN 55428 ("Taxpayer"). Based on information and belief, the Taxpayer and Keith Reitman purchased the Property in 1994 pursuant to a contract for deed, as recorded in Hennepin County, and they have represented to the City that they are the current owners of the Property. The City has been concerned with the Property for many years. As is indicated above, the Property has been unoccupied for approximately 15 year, and a "do -no -occupy" order was previously issued by the City and posted at the Property in 2011. The deteriorating condition of 3 2753 the Property has only worsened in recent years, and in August 2020, a portion of the building's facade broke away, revealing rotted wood and wet conditions in the interior of the structure. On August 24, 2020, the City sent a letter to the Taxpayer identifying the City's concerns regarding the exterior of the structure on the Property and citing violations of the IPMC. (Exhibits A and B) The City also requested to enter the Property to conduct an on -site inspection to determine the condition of the structure and whether it was safe. (Exhibit B) No response was received from the Taxpayer. An inspection of the exterior of the Property took place on August 27, 2020. (Exhibit C) The inspection revealed dilapidation of the exterior, including holes in the exterior walls of the structure, opportunities for water intrusion into the structure, an unsecure door, a gap under a door sufficient to allow water intrusion and rodent infestation, and broken windows. (Id.) The Property remained vacant. (Id.) The City received a report of construction being performed on the Property on September 1, 2020, and the following day, a second inspection of the exterior of the structure revealed that temporary repairs were made to the damaged brick facade of the structure. (Exhibits A and C) On September 8, 2020, a second letter was sent to the Owner requesting an inspection of the Property with full access to the property and the structure. (Exhibit B) The City received confirmation that the August 24, 2020 letter had been received, and on September 9, 2020, the City's August 24 and September 8, 2020 letters were emailed to the Taxpayer. (Exhibit A) On September 17, 2020, counsel for the Taxpayer reported that the Taxpayer would be presenting the City with a structural report from a structural engineer and a contractor's evaluation within 7- 10 days and that the Taxpayer was looking to place a long-term tenant in the Property. (Id.) On September 22, 2020, counsel for the Taxpayer reported that the Property had been inspected by a 4 2754 structural engineer, that the structure appeared sound, and that a report would be coming the following week. (Id.) As of the date of this application, a structural report has not been received by the City, and upon information and belief, neither the Owner nor the Taxpayer have corrected the violations observed by the City inspector and has not consented to an inspection of the Property. Additionally, the presentation of a structural report, which has not taken place, only addresses one of the City's concerns with regard to the hazardous nature and safety of the structure. II. Legal Authority to Request an Administrative Search Warrant The City has the legal authority to request an administrative search warrant. A search warrant for purposes of inspection is authorized by Search Warrant of Columbia Heights v. Rozman, 586 N.W.2d 273 (Minn. App. 1998). In that case, the city code required annual inspections of apartment rental units. A landlord refused City entry into an apartment building and argued the City lacked authority to obtain an administrative search warrant to search the apartments. The court cited Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523 (1967). Rozman, 586 N.W.2d at 275-76. Camara found the Fourth Amendment probable cause standard will "vary with the municipal program being enforced, and may be based upon the passage of time, the nature of the building, or the condition of the entire area, but will not necessarily depend upon specific knowledge of the condition of the particular dwelling." Camara, 387 U.S. at 535-36. In Rozman, the warrant requested was not for an "area inspection" like that in Camara, but rather for a particular building. The Rozman court found the search warrant requested met the probable cause standard since the City had visited the property before and saw the code violations, and also since Camara allows warrants based merely on the "passage of time." Rozman, 586 N.W.2d at 276. The court found the warrant requested in Rozman fell easily within that standard of probable cause. Id. Furthermore, upon application for an 5 2755 administrative search warrant, the power rests with the Court to require that the applicant establishes individualized suspicion, in any given case. See McCaughtry v. City of Red Wing, 831 N.W. 2d 518, 524-525 (Minn. 2013). In this case, the City has authority to request an administrative search warrant to inspect the Property. The City also has met the probable cause and individualized suspicion standards set forth in the Rozman and discussed in the McCaughtry cases. The City observed first hand, over the course of nearly 15 years and most significantly in the past 3 months, ongoing violations of City Code at the Property and the consistent deterioration of the Property. Because the Owner and Taxpayer are unwilling to allow an inspection of the Property, the City has been unable to sufficiently follow up on complaints and its observations of suspected and known violations of the City Code and IPMC violations of the City's nuisance and property maintenance codes. III. Warrant Requested Pursuant to the legal authority cited in this Application, the Applicant seeks an administrative search warrant permitting the City's Building Official, the City's Field Services Officer, and a police escort to enter upon and to allow the Applicant to examine the interior and exterior of the Property in order to enforce the City Code, to take photographs, and to perform other such duties as are necessary to support and document the findings of the interior and exterior inspection. Specifically, the Applicant requests that he and the City's Field Services Officer, Andrew Drilling, may at the time of inspection inspect the interior and exterior of the Property, including the curtilage thereto, to determine and to document the existence and extent of the violations of the City Code at the Property. The Applicant requests that such entry and inspection be allowed to take place on a regular business day between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Because of the Owner and Taxpayer's 6 2756 failure to provide access to the City, Applicant seeks an administrative search warrant, which would allow Applicant, the City's Field Services Officer, and a police escort to use reasonable force in the least intrusive manner to access and examine the interior and exterior of the Property for the purpose of inspection for compliance with the City Code. Subscribed and sworn to before me this y'O" day of A) bV. , 2020. Notary Public REBECCA LYNN MCGUIRE Notary Public -Minnesota A My cOnmIs810n Expires Jan 31, 2023 Scott Qualle, Building Official City of Mound h 2757 EXHIBIT A Summary of Activity (attached hereto) A-1 2758 Summary of Activity Violation type: Vacant Building - exterior concerns Property Address: 2396 Commerce Blvd Owner: Jim Lang Owner Address: Issue: broken windows; failing brick History of attempts tope 08113/2020 - Email Issues: Door kicked in Nuisance Glass issues Reroof permit - status Rodents? Rubbish Doors/Windows Request Interior inspection Dilapidated Phone: (612) 386-7172 Property issue discussed at bi-weekly Mound/MNSPECT staff meeting 08117/2020 - Email 0812112020— - Email Received phone contact information for Mr. Lang Email sent from Mayor to City Administrator 08124/2020 - T Email Received updated information from City Staff 08124/2020 - Letter Letter mailed to property owner - Return Receipt, certified 08125/2020 -^ Email Photos received from City 08/27/2020 - Site visit Site Inspection Inspection from public way 301.3 Vacant structures and land 302.1 Sanitation 302.3 Sidewalks 302.7 Accessory Structures 303.2 Protective treatment 303.4 Structural members 303.6 Exterior walls 303.8 Decorative features - veneer 303.13 Windows 303.13.1 Glazing 303.15 Doors 305.1 Acc. of rubbish 09/01/2020 - Email Report of construction work 09/02/2020 - Site visit Per Inspector's notes: Concrete repairs made to damaged brick veneer; temporary repaairs (photos taken) 09/07/2020 - Email Draft letter of second notice forwarded to City for review prior to sending Tuesday, November 03, 2020 Page 1 of 2 2759 09/08/2020 - Other Received Return Receipt notification 09/08/2020 - Email Received approval for second letter to be mailed - letter sent Return Receipt/Certified 09/09/2020 - Email August 24, 2020, and September 8, 2020, letters forwarded to jobsiang@msn.com Hello Jim, Attached are two letters that were mailed regarding 2396 Commerce Blvd. The first was mailed on August 24, 2020. The second was mailed on September 8, 2020 which is a follow up to the first letter. At this time the City is requesting a site inspection with full access to the property and building to determine if there are safety issues with the structure. The City is requesting access by September 18, 2020. Please contact our office to arrange access. Tracy R 09/17/2020 - Phone call Spoke with Michael Mahoney; attorney for Mr. Lang (612.723-7071. Will have structural report and contractor's evaluation within the next 7-10 days. Looking to put a long-term tenant in the property. 09/22/2020 - Other Received Return Receipt notification 09/22/2020 - Phone call Spoke to Michael Mahoney. Structural engineer inspected. Appears structurally sound. Report coming next week. 10/15/2020 - Phone call Spoke with Michael Mahoney, no report yet. Will contact Mr. Lang right away and get back to Tracy R. 10119/2020 - Misc. clerical Updated Activity Report Note from Tracy Relmann: No meeting action plans; attorney is working with us 10120/2020 - Other Per SQ, proceed with an Administrative Order to gain access to determine If unsafe. 10/30/2020 - Phone call Spoke with Mike Mahoney. He has received copy of engineering, will email me a copy. Tuesday, November 03, 2020 Page 2 of 2 2760 EXHIBIT B Letters to Owner and Taxpayer (attached hereto) 2761 241S WILSHIRE BOU►EVARo • MOUND, MN 553641 :952-072•D60D • FAx:952-0p2.0620 •'""""'r irYOFMOUND.�QlN VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURNRECEIPT REQUESTED,-S. MAIL August 24, 2020 Keith Reitman & James Lang po Box 11832 Minneapolis, MN 55411 RE: 2396 Commerce Blvd, I am writing to bring some issues to your attention as they relate to the above property and the international Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) which is part of the Mound City Code. The iPMC applies to all residential and non-residential structures and constitutes minimum requirements and standards for their maintenance and upkeep. There are a number of concerns regarding the exterior of the structure that need to be addressed as they relate to maintenance, sanitation and public healtporiwateyto intrude tere are concerns about openings in the walls of the structure and opportunities into the building or deteriorate the structure Itself. Due to the current condition of the building and/or property, the following violations of the iPMC were found to exist on the subject property: 301.3 Vacant structures and Land: All vacant structures and premises thereof or vacant land shall be maintained in a clean, sa�blem or adversely affect the public hea, secure and sanitary condition as t h or ed herein so as not to cause a blighting p safety. 3o2,1 sanitation. All exterior property and premises shall be maintained In a clean, safe and sanitary condition. The occupant shall keep that part of the exterior property which such occupant occupies or controls In a dean and sanitary condition. 3025 Rodent Harborage, All structures and exterior property shall be kept free from rodent harborage and infestation. Where rodents are found, they shall be promptly exterminated by approved processes which will not be injurious to human health. After extermination, proper precautions shall be taken to eliminate rodent harborage and prevent re -infestation. 3Q8•2 protective Treatment. All exterior surfaces, including but not limited to, doors, door and window frames, cornices, porches, trim, balconies, decks and fences shall be maintained In good condition. Exterior wood surfaces, other than cay reststant protective woods, shall be protected from the elements and decay by painting covering or treatment. Peeling, flaking and chipped paint shall be eliminated and 2762 surfaces repainted, All siding and masonry joints as well as those between the building envelope and the perimeter of windows, doors, and skylights shall be maintained weather resistant and water tight. All metal surfaces subject to rust or corrosion shall be coated to inhibit such rust and corrosion and all surfaces with rust or corrosion shall be stabilized and coated to inhibit future rust and corrosion. oxidation stains shall be removed from exterior surfaces. Surfaces designed for stabilization by oxidation are exempt from this requirement. 303.6 Exterior walls. All exterior walls shall be free from holes, breaks, and loose or rotting materials, and maintained weatherproof and properly surface coated where required to prevent deterioration. 303.19 window, skylight and door frames. Every window, skylight, door and frame shall be kept in sound condition, good repair and weather tight. 303.13.1 Glazing. All glazing materials shall be maintained free from cracks and holes. 303.15 Doors. All exterior doors, door assemblies and hardware shall be maintained in good condition. The ty of Mound ing an on -site ion of the property locate at 2396 ce Blvd.,Mound, The ipurpose tof he requested inspection is to determine hecel condition of he structure and whether the structure is unsafe. IPMC 104.4 Right of Entry. The code official is authorized to enter the structure or premises at reasonable times to inspect subject to constitutional restrictions on unreasonable searches and seizures. If entry is refused or not obtained, the code official is authorized to pursue recourse as provided by law. Please call our office at 952-442-7520 by August 28, 2020 to coordinate a convenient time to conduct the Inspection. Sincerely, _ J114'+—^ Tracy Reimann Code Enforcement City of Mound 952.442-7520 cc Municipal File Copy 2763 2415 WILSHiRE BOUI.6VAR0 • MOUND, MN 5S364.1668' pH: 952.472,0600 • FAX 9S2 472 OSZUFM UN VIA CERTIFIER MAiL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED, AND REGULAR U.S. MAIL September 8, 2020 A Williams Trustee Keith Reitman &lames Lang po Box 11882 Minneapolis, MN 55411 RE: 2396 commerce Blvd., Mound, MN To Whom It May Concern: This letter is in reference to the above- mentioned property located at 2396 Commerce Boules in violation Mound, MN. Based on the exterior condition of the property, it appears that the property' of the 2000 international property Maintenance Code (IPMc), which the City has adopted and does enforce. In addition, there are concerns that the structure may be unsafe per MN Rules Chapter 1300.0180: "A building or structure regulated by the code is unsafe, for purposes of this part, if It Is structurally unsafe, not provided with adequate egress, a fire hazard, or otherwise dangerous to human life. Building service equipment that is regulated by the code Is unsafe, for purposes of this port, If It ISO fire, electrical, or health hazard, an unsanitary condition, or otherwise dangerous to human life, use of a building, structure, or building service equipment constituting a hazard to safety, health, or public welfare by reason of Inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, obsolescence, fire hazard, disaster, damage or abandonment is, for the purposes of this part, an unsafe use." At this time, we are requesting a site inspection to determine if there are any safety concerns with the structure and to discuss the potential violations to include any required permitting. We are requesting full access of the property and building. Please call our office at 952.442.7520 to arrange access to the property. We are requesting this inspection be conducted no later than September 18, 2020. While the city is willing to work with You on resolving these issues, failure to allow access will result in the City seeking an administrative search warrant. We look forward to working with you on resolving this issue. Sincerely, Tracy Relmann Code Official 952-442-7520 C: Municipal Property File 2764 EXHIBIT C Inspection Reports (attached hereto) C-1 2765 MNSPECTLLC 235 First Street West • We0onie, MN 55387-1302 December 6, 2020 Sarah Smith City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Sarah, On Wednesday, November 25, 2020, 1 executed an administrative search warrant for the property known as the Williams Store located at 2396 Commerce Boulevard. The purpose of the warrant was to gain entry into the building to determine if the structure is unsafe. We requested entry, but access was not voluntarily provided. Field Service Officer Andrew Drilling accompanied me along with a representative of the owner named Shawn. The Orono Police Department was at the site at the outset of entry into the building. The structure is on a zero or near zero lot line. Any openings on the north or south sides of the building would violate the building code. The structure appears to have been constructed in several phases. Observations: 1. The stone/brick fagade is not water tight, and has been admitting moisture for an extended period of time. The exterior weather barrier (stone/brick) is non- contiguous and has broken or dislodged in many areas. The sheathing under the windows is no longer present, and the framing is significantly deteriorated to the point that structural integrity is in question. (Photos 001 - 015) 2. The stucco finish on the north and south sides of the building has frequent and significant cracks allowing water intrusion. (Photos 016 - 019) 3. The building has been constructed of a series of buildings installed at different times. The joints or connections between those phases is failing, and the above - grade concrete masonry walls show signs of failure and many mortar joints have cracked or failed. (Photos 020 — 023) 4. The building (the last addition) added on the east end of the structure is not accessible from the interior upstairs of the main building. It is in the worst condition of the structure on the site. The floor is unsound and has been severely affected by water intrusion. The walls are collapsing. (Photo 24, addressed later, item 31) P: 952-442-7520 • 888-4NO1 • F: 952-442-7521 • www.mnspect.com 5. The front door was, as some time, replaced with a veneered wood door, which is suffering from moisture damage. Photos 007 - 008) 6. Upon entry into the structure (access to which was provided by Shawn with a key), We walked around the interior of the structure There are numerous instances where there is daylight visible through a structural failure at a wall/roof intersection, the roof itself, or at a wall. (Photos 025-027). There were no lights present in the building, and all windows are covered with privacy -type blinds, so our inspection was performed with flashlights. 7. The front portion of the north section of the structure has a wood -framed flat roof/ceiling assembly. There are numerous instances where there is evidence of water intrusion into the structure in the wood framed portion. (Photos 028 & 028A) 8. The rear portion of the north section of the structure has a pre -cast concrete plank roof. The tendons that provide the structural reinforcement for the flat roof/ceiling assembly are to be kept dry to prevent oxidation (rusting) of the tendons. There are brown stains (evidence of rust) between most every plank in this section of the roof/ceiling assembly. (Photos 029-032) 9. The roof/ceiling assembly in the south portion of the structure appears to have been all wood framed. A look to the ceiling shown numerous instances where the rood deck (sheathing) has deteriorated to the extent that there is no material remaining to support the roof membrane or individuals on the roof. This deterioration occurs in the center of the building (away from any exterior walls). (Photos 033-034) 10. The walls on the main floor were covered with plastic. We did not remove the plastic sheeting as a part of our search. (Photos 035-045 & 066-067) 11. The floor tiles (some present and many missing) are of a size and vintage that is highly likely to be Asbestos Containing Material (ACM). Because the tile has been partially removed and is broken and damaged, it could become airborne and is a hazard on MN Pollution Control (MPCA) Guidelines. (Photos 046-049) 12. In the rear of the building, there is a stairway that provides access to the basement of the building. It as no guards, handrails, and violates numerous other building and fire code requirements. (Photos 050-051) 13. The main level flooring on the south portion of the structure near the stairway has also failed from water intrusion and is unsafe. (Photos 052-054, 068) 14. In the basement, once present windows have been filled -in with block that was not laid in running bond (50% overlap of lower blocks), creating a structural weakness. (Photo 055) 15. There are numerous areas where the formerly structural basement walls have been compromised to create doorways between inaccessible compartments. These openings appear to have been created with striking tools (sledge hammers, chisels, etc.), not saw cut openings. There is no evidence of lintel or other essential support materials. (Photos 056-065, 065A) 16. In the basement on the north'/3 of the structure, there is evidence of water intrusion in the rear wall. (Photo 069) 17. There is significant soil intrusion from the south eats end of the building from the last addition under the stairway. (Photo 070) 18. In addition, there is a significant amount of dirt that has eroded from the exterior and entered under the rear door. (Photo 071) P: 952-442-7520 • 888-4NO71 • F: 952-442-7521 • www.mnspect.com 19. A portion of the basement was a crawl space, but access doors were created to access the space, and significant amount of fill have been removed. This compromises the stability of the soils that support the floor system above, and the walls were likely designed for balanced backfill. With soil removal, the walls may experience unexpected pressure and could fail. (Photos 072-073) 20. In the crawl space area (south side, central portion), the beam supports have been replaced with a series of temporary or non -stable supports, and it is likely that the support beams are now over -spanned and at risk of failure. (Photo 072) 21. The front section of the structure on the south side has the electrical service. Most of the electrical service panels are significantly corroded. I would expect that the entire electrical service would need to be replaced. (Photos 074-076) 22. The beams supporting the basement floor/ceiling assembly in the front section of the structure on the south side are supported by tree trunks, on pier blocks, on footings. (Photos 075-077) 23. The horizontal sections of the cast iron drain pipes do not appear to be adequately supported and are at risk of failure. (Photos 075-076) 24. The heat plant is corroded to the point of failure and will need to be replaced. The remaining ductwork had significant corrosion. (Photo 078) 25. The concrete masonry unit foundation walls have numerous stair -step cracks indicating either non -vertical loads, settled footings, or loads that are not uniformly distributed. (Photos 079-083) 26. There is a corner of the building where the foundation has completely failed, and the dirt is eroding through the damaged blockwall. This is a sign of a significant structural failure. (Photo084) 27. A beam in the basement is supported by a non -conforming support member, and is set at an angle that in hazardous. (Photo 060) 28. There is a mechanical ventilation opening in the south wall of the building that is not allowed without a fire damper or other fire protection (Photo 085). Daylight is visible through this opening (Photos 137-138). 29. The roof was replaced, initially without a permit. When the workers were confronted, they were ordered to stop work until a permit was obtained. In addition, they were installing used material that is not allowed in the code. No inspections have been conducted, and no work has been approved. The roof has failed in numerous locations, allowing water to infiltrate and damage the roof sheathing to the point that the roof is hazardous to walk on. (Photos 086-118) 30. There is a virtual trash dump in the rear of the lot, behind the building. Materials include furniture, garbage cans, storage bins, trash bags, windows, glass, a truck topper, 5-gallon pails with possible hazardous materials or residue, a roof -top HVAC unit, and cut tree limbs. (Photos 119-127) 31. The "last' addition to the structure was built in the rear of the building on the south side. It appears to have been accessible only from the outside at the ground level, and the from the basement at the lower level. The foundation has moved several inches and has failed. It must be removed. (Photos 128-131) 32. The siding and weather resistive barrier(s) have failed. The floor system and the floor joists that support the floor have failed. The basement area (which has been filled with erosion) is visible from the exterior. (Photos 130-131) P: 952-442-7520 • 888-4NO81 • F: 952-442-7521 • www.mnspect.com 33. The roof has been covered with a membrane with 50 to 100 seams. There is a tarp that has been on the roof so long is has rotted away (Photos 95-103). There is another area that is covered with a piece of plastic and stones (Photos 104 & 112). There is standing water on the roof (Photos 105 & 115). The roof loosely overhangs the edges of the building without any coping or flashing (Photos 091- 092, 104, 120). The roofing at the south east corner of the building has flipped up such that the roof sheathing is exposed. (Photos 107 & 120) 34. The chimney is not sealed and allows water to enter the basement from the roof. (Photo 132) 35. There are power lines that are only 16-20" above the building. This is a hazard to service the roof. (Photo 116) 36. There is an abandoned electrical power mast on the south west corner of the building that could fall and injure someone. (Photo 133) 37. There are unprotected electrical wires that are not weather protected on the exterior of the building. (Photo 134) 38. Erosion of soil at the rear of the building, the access from the walk -out door in the north side, east end has been obstructed. (Photo 135) 39. There is an unprotected mechanical opening at the rear of the building. (Photo 136) Conclusions: • This building has suffered from over a decade of neglect. Lack of maintenance, illegal modifications, and water intrusion have diminished the structure to a point where it is not economically feasible to repair or restore this structure. Because of the foundation damage and collapsing area, along with the deterioration of the roof and floor systems, I believe that he building is hazardous and should be removed by demolition. Respectfully, Scott Qualle Building Official P: 952-442-7520 • 888-4N%1 • F: 952-442-7521 • www.mnspect.com ��POP PPPP 7 NOVA PhtXIA PhtM 110 PhA('IOJPG PhW11JPG M01 E NOUN PhtMN'R M('13JPG PhA('1 A k9170 NOW NOON RA Non M N1A Ph0�022JPG Ph0�03GJPG PhOM024JPG Ph0�025GPG Ph0�026JPG Ph01o021JPG Photo028JPG NoA Ph0O A Ph0�13 A Pht�031JPG Pho�032JPG PhoM033JPG Pho�034JPG Pho�h35JPG Pholo036JPG Pho�03 A Pht NUPG Pht�NUN Pht AJPG N NIJPG NMpo PhANUPG PdAPO MNUN N04 N M04 E Pd UNPG Pd04 N PdNUN Nb T A PheM0VA Pheb003JPG PhA0OPG PdMPG Pho�00 A Pho�0FA Ph IO N0 A 4936,10 Phom ROO PhtVIA Ph0N00 NW A NO A PhtO00 ft06 in NOUN N O NPG NOUN NOUN IM Pht�PUN Ph NII'llPG Ph ONPO PhtVIR Ph VINPO PhtNIA PNIII'JPG PhtNINFO NOUN PhtVINA MA MA PhUI'llPG PhtMOER Pco'llPG PhOA Ills PhOJPG PheUOPO PheMOFA PheUNN PhoUNN NOUN Ph0NIA PB0gpA PBOUPB PB0OOPO II I I I Nh 104A Nh INA Nh IRA Nh IFJPG MIOBJPG PdIRA PdIRA PhtM111A M111A M M,JPG 1 PdIRA Philp11UPG RA11UPG Pd111JPG PdIRA Pht�1POJPG Pht�1P1JPG PhtM1P2JPG Pht�123JPG i Ph0�1P4JPG Nh IMPG PhtloMpG RA TJPG N12BJPG r NlrI JPG I RA130JPG PhtM131JPG RAINJPG Nh 133JPG RA A dillPht�13 IM EXHIBIT C Architectural Plans (attached hereto) C-1 2774 O & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. November 18, 2021 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: Engineering Report Lynwood Boulevard Watermain Improvements Phase 2 City Project No. PW-22-01 Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph:[9521448-8838 Fax:[9521448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com The 2021-2030 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes the replacement of aging watermain that is prone to breakage and rupture along Lynwood Boulevard from Westedge Boulevard to Grandview Boulevard. This work is scheduled to be split into three projects, with the first phase from Westedge Boulevard to Birch Lane completed in 2021 and phase 2 form Birch Lane to Southview Lane. By Council Resolution adopted at the October 26, 2021, meeting, an engineering Feasibility Report was ordered to determine in a preliminary manner, the feasibility of reconstructing the Lynwood Boulevard watermain and accompanying surface restoration. BACKGROUND The City of Mound's existing water distribution system includes many pipes that are made from cast iron materials and date back to the original installation of the system in the 1960's. Some of these pipes have reached the end of their usable life and are prone to breakage and rupture. Further evidence of the poor condition of this pipe is demonstrated with recent break history, which included three breaks in the last two years. PROPOSED PROJECT The improvements are proposed from the intersection of Birch Lane and terminating at the intersection of Southview Lane. The proposed project will replace the existing 6-inch watermain, valving, hydrants and replace water services. To reduce street disturbance and achieve lower project costs, the watermain will be replaced via pipe bursting. H. AMOONVOC1125930\2 Prellminar,VC_Reports\125930_Peaslblllty Letter Report to Couodl_lynwood WM 2.doce Bolton & Mark is an equal opportunity employer. ESTIMATED COSTS The proposed project is feasible from a technical standpoint. In addition, the project is necessary to provide drinking water as free as possible from maintenance, interruptions in service and provide adequate fire flows. The proposed improvements represent cost effective means for doing so. The following cost summary indicates the anticipated costs. Pipe Burst: Estimated Cost Su SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $377,499 10%CONTINGENCIES $37,750 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $415,249 25% INDIRECT COSTS $103,812 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $519,061 Itemized cost estimate also attached. The allowance for indirect project costs includes, but is not limited to, engineering, surveying, geotechnical, administrative, fiscal and legal costs. Easement acquisition costs, if required, are not included. Funding for the proposed watermain improvements will be from the utility bond sale, with repayment through the Water Fund. RECOMMENDATION If approved, the proposed project schedule is to open bids and award the project in April. Construction is anticipated to commence in May with substantial completion in July. Schedule pending nearby county project coordination. We request that the Council accept this Engineering Report and approve the attached Resolution authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the Lynwood Boulevard Watermain Improvements Project Phase 2. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Brian D. Simmons, P.E. City Engineer H.AMOONVOC1125930\2 Prelim inar,VC_Reports\125930_Peaslblllty Letter Report to Couodl_IyoWood WM 2. pore Batton & Menk is an PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE LYNWOOD WATERMAIN PHASE 2 (BIRCH TO SOURTHVIEW) CITY OF MOUND BMI PROJECT NO. OC1.125730 LYNWOOD WM (PIPE BURST, REPLACE WATER SERVICE) 1 MOBILIZATION (5%) LS 1 $20,000.001 $20,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $30,500.00 $30,500.00 3 CLEARING AND GRUBBING TREE 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 4 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SO YD 30 $13.50 $405.00 5 REMOVE WATERMAIN PIPE LIN FT 65 $12.00 $1,020.00 6 REMOVE HYDRANTASSEMBLY EACH 1 $600.00 $600.00 7 REMOVE GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 6 $450.00 $2,700.00 S EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION HOUR 4 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 9 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE EACH 20 $650.00 $13,000.00 10 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CU YD SO $42.00 $3,360.00 11 STABILIZING AGGREGATE (CV) CU YD SO $62.00 $4,960.00 12 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SO YD 100 $3.42 $342.00 13 COUNTY ROAD PATCH SO YD 690 $100.00 $69,000.00 14 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY (W/6" CL. 5 AGG. BASE) SO YD 20 $70.00 $1,400.00 15 AGGREGATE BEDDING TON 60 $37.00 $2,220.00 16 B" NOM. C900 PVC WATERMAIN DR 16 (PIPE BURST) LIN FT 656 $120.00 $102,960.00 17 6" WATERMAIN DIP -CL52 LIN FT 20 $95.00 $1,900.00 16 6" C900 PVC WATERMAIN LIN FT 60 $90.00 $5,400.00 19 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 5 $2,080.00 $10,400.00 20 B" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 4 $2,600.00 $10,400.00 21 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 12 $750.00 $9,000.00 22 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 12 $1,650.00 $19,800.00 23 1" WATER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 420 $40.00 $16,800.00 24 HYDRANT EACH 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 25 CONNECTTO EXISTING WATERMAIN EACH 6 $5,000.00 $30,000.00 26 CONNECTTO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EACH 12 $450.00 $5,400.00 27 WATER SERVICE LID COVER EACH 2 $300.00 $600.00 26 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUNDS 520 $12.00 $6,240.00 29 BITUMINOUS CURB LIN FT 240 $17.50 $4,200.00 30 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (DESIGN ANY) LIN FT 60 $70.00 $4,200.00 31 BIOLOG LIN FT 190 $4.13 $784.70 32 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CU YD 217 $60.00 $13,000.00 33 SOD, TYPE LAWN SO YD 1000 $10.20 $10,200.00 34 B" SOLID LINE PAINT LIN FT 675 $0.50 $437.50 35 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT LIN FT 1750 $0.50 $875.00 36 VERIFY SANITARY SEWER SERVICE (POST -PIPE BURSTING) EACH 12 $500.00 $6,000.00 37 REPAIR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE (POST -PIPE BURSTING) EACH 2 $2,650.00 $5,300.00 36 LANSCAPE ALLOWANCE ALLOWANCE 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION: $377,499.20 10%CONTINGENCIES: $37,749.92 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION WITH CONTINGENCY: $415,249.12 25% INDIRECT COSTS: $103,812.28 TOTAL WATERMAIN (PIPE BURST) PROJECT COSTS: $519,061.40 2777 LYNWOOD WATERMAIN (BIRCH TO SOUTHVIEW) Figure #: 1 OLTON CITY OF MOUND o 75 150 JANUARY 2022GAMENK HORZ. SCALE FEET CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 21- RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR LYNWOOD WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT PHASE 2: BIRCH TO SOUTHVIEW WHEREAS, as part of the Capital Improvement Plan the City of Mound has replaced and rehabilitated its aging potable water distribution system; and WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Plan for 2022 includes the replacement of water main in the corridor of Lynwood Boulevard from the Birch Lane to Southview Lane; WHEREAS, the Council received and reviewed this report on November 23, 2021; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to receive this engineering report, to order preparation of plans and specifications, and to order advertisement for bids for the Lynwood Watermain Improvement Phase 2. Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of November 2021 ATTEST: Kevin Kelly, City Clerk Raymond J. Salazar, Mayor 2779 QBOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Lynwood Boulevard Watermain Improvements Phase 2: Birch to Southview November 23, 2021 Lynwood Boulevard Watermain Improvements — Phase II • Phase 2, extending east from past season work • History of Breaks • Three (3) breaks in the last few years • Aging cast iron pipes • Critical link in water distribution Infrastructure • Utility is placed in the (Hennepin) County Road • This makes pavement replacement expensive • Watermain size, position, layout, and connections lend themselves well to trenchless rehabilitation/construction methods • Previous bids indicate pipe bursting is the most economical method 2781 M & MLENK Real People. Real Solutions. LYNWOOD WATERMAIN (BIRCH TO SOUTHVIEW) CITY OF MOUND ®n Figure #: 1 ggpQI.TON JANUARY 2022 mw UFA% -1 I ` _ 4 — 782--1,- .w LEGEND -I- EXISTING WM X X X X X PIPE BURST WM a EXISTINGSAN N GATEVALVE HYDRANT SAN MANHOLE PROPERTIES WITH C WATER SERVICE OPEN PIT. PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE LYNWOOD WATERMAIN PHASE 2 {BIRCH TO SOURTHVIEW) CITY OF MOUND BMI PROJECT NO. DC1.125730 LYNWOOD WM (PIPE BURST, REPLACE WATER SERVICE) ITEM NO ITEM -NIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL AME)UNT 1 MOBILIZATION (5%) LS 1 $20,000-001 $20,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $30,500.00 $30,500.00 3 CLEARING AND GRUBBING TREE 2 $1,500.00 $3,00D.00 I REMOVE BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SQYO 30 $13.50 $405.00 REMOVE WATERMAIN PIPE LIN FT 85 $12.00 $1,020.00 6 REMOVE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EACH 1 $600.00 $600.00 7 REMOVE GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 6 $1450.00 $2,700.00 8 EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION HOUR 4 51,000.00 $4,000.00 9 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE EACH 20 $650.00 $13,000.00 10 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV) CU YD 80 $42.00 $3,360.00 11 STABILIZING AGGREGATE (CV) CU YD 80 S62.001 $4,960.00 12 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, TYPE V SO. YD 100 $3.42 5342.00 13 COUNTY ROAD PATCH SQYD 690 $200,00 $69 000.00 14 3" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY W/6" CL 5AGG. BASE SQYD 20 $70.00 $1,400.00 15 AGGREGATE BEDDING TON 60 $37.00 $2,220.00 16 8" NOM. CSOO PVC WATERMAIN DR 18 (PIPE BURST) LIN FT 859 $120.00 $102,960.00 17 6" WATERMAIN DIP -CL 52 LIN FT 20 $95.D0 $1,900.00 18 6" C900 PVC WATERMAIN LIN FT 60 $90.00 $5 400.00 19 6" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 5 $2,080.00 $10,400.00 20 8" GATE VALVE AND BOX EACH 4 $2,600.00 $10,400.00 21 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH 12 $750.001 $9,000.00 22 1" CORPORATION STOP EACH 12 $1,650.00 $19,900.00 23 1" WATER SERVICE PIPE LIN FT 420 $40.00 $16,800.00 24 HYDRANT EACH 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 25 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EACH 6 $51000.00 $3D,000.00 26 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE EACH 12 $450.00 $5.400.00 27 WATER SERVICE LID COVER EACH 2 $300.00 $600.00 28 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS POUNDS 520 $12.DO $6,240.00 29 BITUMINOUSCURS LIN FT 240 $17.50 $4,200.00 30 CONCRETE CURB& GUTTER (DESIGN ANY) LIN FT 60 $70.00 $4,200.00 31 BIOLOG LIN FT 190 $4.13 $784.70 32 TOPSOIL BORROW LV CU YD 227 $60.00 $13,000.00 33 SOD, TYPE LAWN SQYD 1000 $10.20 $10,200.00 34 8" SOLID LINE PAINT LIN FT 875 $0.50 $437.50 3S 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE PAINT LIN FT 1750 $0.50 $875.00 36 VERIFY SANITARY SEWER SERVICE POST -PIPE BURSTINGI EACH 12 $500.00 $6,000.00 37 REPAIR SANITARY SEWER SERVICE POST -PIPE BURSTING EACH 2 $2,650.00 $5,300.00 38 LANSCAPE ALLOWANCE ALLOWANCE 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION: 10% CONTINGENCIES: S377A99.20 $37,749.92 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION WITH CONTINGENCY: S415.249.12 25% INDIRECT COSTS: $103,912.28 27MAL WATERMAIN [PIPE BURST) PROJECT COSTS: 5519.061AO Lynwood Boulevard Watermain Improvements — Phase II • Total Estimated Project Cost of $519,061 • Phase II is programmed in the CIP for 2022 • Currently intended to be financed through the water fund 2784 Project Schedule GEtebeF Council Authorizes Engineering Study November 2021 Council receives Engineering Study and orders Project Plans and Specifications, and Authorizes Bidding February 2022 Bids are opened March 2022 City Council Awards Contract May 2022 Construction Begins July 2022 Substantial Completion of Project 2785 Next Steps Requested Council Action, for Consideration: • Resolution Accepting the Study and Ordering preparation of Plans & Specs, Authorizing solicitation for bids 2786 QBOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Lynwood Boulevard Watermain Improvements Phase 2: Birch to Southview November 23, 2021 O & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. November 18, 2021 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: Engineering Report 2022 Lift Station Improvements City Project No. PW-22-03 Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph:[9521448-8838 Fax:[9521448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com The 2022-2031 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes reconstruction of one sanitary sewer lift station and installation of a backup generator in 2022 at an estimated total project cost of $516,780. Island View LS R1 has been identified as the priority station for replacement. By Council Resolution adopted at the October 26, 2021 meeting to prepare a report on the estimated cost and feasibility of replacing LS R1 this report has been prepared. BACKGROUND The City of Mound's existing sanitary sewer system contains 30 lift stations of varying ages and operational capability. In addition, while significant improvements have been made to the existing sewer collection system over the past several years through the annual "cured in place pipe" (CIPP) lining projects, more needs to be done to lessen the amount of Inflow and Infiltration (I & I) into the city's system. Many of the lift stations are experiencing various operational problems, including but not limited to: extensive maintenance, lack of pumping and storage capacity, infiltration and potential station backups during rainfall events. The proposed 2022 Lift Station Improvement Project is the sixteenth year of the lift station reconstruction program which began in 2007. A total of twenty-three lift stations will have been replaced and upgraded with the completion of the 2021 project. PROPOSED PROTECT The attached Figure No. 1 indicates the location of Lift Station R1 at 4783 Island View Drive, the station proposed for the 2022 improvement project. H. AMOONVOC112S733\1 CorresVC To OthersVFeasibility Letter Report to Couodl_22 LS.pocx Batton & Menk is an 2 Lift Station R1 The Island View Drive lift station, LS R1, was originally constructed in the early 1960's as a pump station with wet well and the pumps were replaced in the 1990's. The current pumps in the station are old and near the end of their expected service life. The steel structure is corroded and in need of replacement. Proposed improvements of LS R1 include: construction of a new precast concrete wet well containing two submersible pumps; a separate manhole and meter for monitoring flow; a new control panel with SCADA equipment to allow remote monitoring of the station operation; an on -site emergency backup generator and an emergency warning system consisting of an alarm and strobe light; a new force main. The surface structures at the existing lift station will be removed and the underground structures will be filled and abandoned. ESTIMATED COSTS The proposed project is feasible from a technical standpoint. In addition, the project is necessary to provide lift station service as free as possible from maintenance and back up issues, and the proposed improvements represent cost effective means for doing so. The following table summarizes the estimated project costs including equipment, which will be purchased by the City directly from the vendors. Detailed project cost tabulation is included in the Appendix. EstimatedTotal Estimated Estimated Construction Indirect Citv- Estimated Improvement Costw Costs Purchased proiect Contineencv 20° EauinmentCost Cost Island View LS R1 $322,650 $64,530 $129,600 $516,780 The allowance for indirect project costs includes, but is not limited to, engineering, surveying, geotechnical, administrative, fiscal, and legal costs. Easement acquisition costs, if required, are not included. Funding for the proposed lift station improvements and sewer reroute will be from the utility bond sale, with repayment through the Sewer Fund. If approved, the proposed project schedule is to open bids and award the project in March. Some of the city -purchased equipment requires up to three months for delivery which typically commences after the project has been awarded. Construction is anticipated to commence in June with substantial completion in September. We request that the Council accept this Engineering Report and approve the attached Resolution authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the 2022 Lift Station Improvements. H. AMOONVOC112S733\1 CorresVC To OthersVFeasibility Letter Report to Couodl_22 LS.pocx Batton & Menk is an equal Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Matthew S. Bauman, P.E. Assistant City Engineer H. AMOONVOC112S733\1 CorresVC To OthersVFeasibility Letter Report to Couodl_22 LS.pocx Batton & Menk is an CITY OF MOUND LIFT STATION R1 -ISLAND VIEW OC1.125733 PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE NOVEMBER 18, 2021 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL 2 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 3 CLEARING AND GRUBBING 4 REMOVE CONCRETE STREET 5 REMOVE L.S. CONTROL PANEL 6 REMOVE CASTING ASSEMBLY 7 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 8 ABANDON LIFT STATION 9 ABANDON SANITARY SEWER & FORCEMAIN PIPE 10 REMOVE SANITARY MANHOLE 11 4" PVC SDR 26, SERVICE PIPE 12 8" DIP SEWER, CL. 52 13 4" DIP FORCEMAIN 14 4" HDPE FORCEMAIN (DRILLED) 15 4" GATE VALVE 16 DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS 17 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLE 18 FURNISH AND INSTALL SANITARY MANHOLE 19 CASTING ASSEMBLY 20 CHIMNEY SEAL 21 AGGREGATE BEDDING 22 SEWAGE PUMP TRUCK 72" PRE -CAST CONCRETE WET WELL AND 10'X6' VALVE VAULT 23 WITH PIPING AND VALVING 24 ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION 25 SITE GRADING 26 FLOWABLE FILL 27 4" PERF TP PIPE DRAIN WITH AGGREGATE 28 4" PVC PIPE DRAIN 29 4" PVC CLEAN OUT 30 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW FOR CONCRETE PADS 31 8" CONCRETE GENERATOR PAD 32 FURNISH AND PLACE AGGREGATE BASE, CL.5 33 EXCAVATE, SALVAGE, REUSE & COMPACT EXISTING GRAVEL BASE 34 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) 35 TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS NON -WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B) 36 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER -VALLEY 37 CONCRETE STREET 38 BOLLARD GUARD POST 39 HYDROMULCH AND SEEDING 40 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) 41 SILT FENCE 42 STORMWATER TREATMENT 43 LANDSCAPE 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 1 LS $2,560.00 $2,560.00 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 25 SY $40.00 $1,000.00 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500.00 1 EA $150.00 $150.00 40 LF $15.00 $600.00 1 LS $6,200.00 $6,200.00 410 LF $20.00 $8,200.00 1 EA $2,900.00 $2,900.00 50 LF $25.00 $1,250.00 15 LF $260.00 $3,900.00 25 LF $150.00 $3,750.00 300 LF $70.00 $21,000.00 1 EA $1,800.00 $1,800.00 200 LB $12.00 $2,400.00 1 EA $5,300.00 $5,300.00 1 EA $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1 EA $2,350.00 $2,350.00 1 EA $350.00 $350.00 25 TON $50.00 $1,250.00 10 HR $275.00 $2,750.00 1 LS $140,000.00 $140,000.00 1 LS $21,000.00 $21,000.00 1 LS $7,500.00 $7,500.00 10 CY $220.00 $2,200.00 30 LF $32.00 $960.00 50 LF $29.00 $1,450.00 1 EA $300.00 $300.00 25 TON $55.00 $1,375.00 200 SF $25.00 $5,000.00 54 TON $45.00 $2,430.00 70 CY $42.00 $2,940.00 40 TON $120.00 $4,800.00 5 TON $115.00 $575.00 35 LF $40.00 $1,400.00 25 SY $140.00 $3,500.00 6 EA $700.00 $4,200.00 500 SY $3.00 $1,500.00 100 CY $61.00 $6,100.00 275 LF $2.60 $715.00 1 LUMP SUM $1,500.00 $1,500.00 1 ALLOWANCE $2,500.00 $2,500.00 SUBTOTAL $292,655.00 IT WIOUNNC112573A2Praliminar;AA Calcolalions2022 PREJMWARVIJFT STATION COST ESTIMATE Is 2791 LIFT STATION R1 -ISLAND VIEW OC1.125733 PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE NOVEMBER 18, 2021 NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT PRICE AMOUNT TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $307,287.75 CONTINGENCY -5% $15,364.39 CONSTRUCTION COST PLUS CONTINGENCY $322,652.14 ENGINEERING,ADMINISTRATIVE, FISCAL, LEGAL &MISC. FEES -20% $64,530.43 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $387,182.57 PUMPING EQUIPMENT PACKAGE (6.5HP PUMPS &4" METER) $42,500.00 CONTROL PANEL $67,350.00 GENERATOR $19,750.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $129,600.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST WITH EQUIPMENT $516,782.57 IT WIOUNNC112573A2Praliminar;AA Calmlations2022 PREJMWARVIJFT STATION COST ESTIMATE Is 2792 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 21- RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2022 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council, on October 26, 2021, referred the 2022 Lift Station Improvements to Bolton & Menk for study of Lift Station R-1, located at 4956 Island View Drive; and WHEREAS, LS R-1 is currently shown as a lift station replacement project in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in year 2021; and WHEREAS, the Council received and reviewed this report on November 23, 2021; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to receive this engineering report, to order preparation of plans and specifications, and to order advertisement for bids for the 2022 Lift Station Improvements for Lift Station R-1. Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of November 2021 ATTEST: Kevin Kelly, City Clerk Raymond J. Salazar, Mayor 2794 QBOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Capitol Improvement Plan Projects R-1 Island View Drive November 23, 2021 Background — Lift Stations &The CIP • Mound owns and operates 30 Sanitary Sewer Lift Stations • Lift Stations are an integral part of the sanitary sewer system • 23 Have been reconstructed to date • Capital Improvement Projects plan includes one (1) per year for the next 7 years • Because the CIP is a living and iterative document, we can choose to shift our efforts each year to the worst conditions at the time • We did this in 2019 by opting to reconstruct Fernside Forcemain in favor of reconstructing J-1 2796 R-1 V (DI Proposed Costs • The proposed reconstruction includes replacement of: • The underground structure • The forcemain • New pumps (city procured) • New control panel, SCADA, and natural gas backup generator Estimated Estimated Improvement Construction�ru Ind Purchased Estimated Cost w Costs Euimnt Project Continency 20° Cost Cost Island View LS R1 $322,650 $64,530 $129,600 $516,780 (DI Next Steps Requested Council Action, for Consideration: Resolution Accepting the Study and Ordering preparation of Plans & Specs, and Authorizing advertisement for bids 2799 Proposed Project Schedulei •t,+,zAor')Q ') �191 K� GOURGII allthOFIZeS ERgiReeFiRot44 November 23, 2021 Council receives Engineering Study and orders Project Plans and Specifications March 2022 Bids are opened April 2022 City Council Awards Contract May 2022 Construction Begins September 2022 Substantial Completion of Project :a QBOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Capitol Improvement Plan Projects R-1 Island View Drive November 23, 2021 L �0+ Au Z C0 G O a w H U F- Z w 2 F- a a w 0 w LL Z O 2 r N O N m 7 0 L W P LL C m U) C 0 CL d to i L d E w o 2 = N M 0 0 r N N N O N w CO LO O co CO N O I� M O I. O O coNco LO N Cf) r CO r� rLO N r M N M It W = r O rN.. V O O> N UMO�CoLo WON(0 co r �cCN o 4 CD It O N w L O N Lo N LO C 0 0 N O N O O O L� � ct O CM r m V N O T CL Vi U- N CD N M O O O r O r N M 0 O N cM IT 0 co isd O O C ODrC0 0 co O O �- r 0 r =N ON COM r r M ce)M C4 M CO M 0 Op r. M O N N� O M r r 0 r- N O (D 1O N O i N N a1 CA M w 0 L(V � N � N O O r 0 O I- i- LC) O N d L_ r- T l7 N r O CCi U N M N Lf) LO N r 0 0 r M r N 0 O CA N S d' O O T 00 OJ G. a) U a) L) a) LL) ` a) a) V Q w d ` d .v m J a� _ ` 0 O a� _ `= U O� m _ L)) O�� m _ O a� = �_ y U a) L- 00 'O Q H U p p p p m w U~ d p Y p U p U O Q Q m Q U p Z z H Q Z Z 0 _COQ U U w O O M M r 0 00 0)r- O N U U Q Z w a O U) w Y � z gW I }p � O QO� E of Q U W_ U �_ j J Q J Q U J Q LL w Q w >1w W 2P:w �_� C _ U = J O O U w w H 0 w U w J Q w O N M M O N O N O O O O M CM N qT O G r— r � co CM N 0 N NO O N LN N CQ CC G U) J p J w >_wU z w 0 z_ WU2 J J U)J _J d Q U W Z U pQC� p _j Q z_ —a Q�q d = E mo C ' 0 t p W U Co G N O N L W O U I, co LL Q' LL T r r ('M m r M'cl- (O r M N 0 (O d) N N O LO � L() � O r r T NCO N CM r T r T T T T r r T M 2 12 N O CC c a E-a co N E N 2 ��cNc 0Lv O 0 a) � c Uo X 2c LwHL LL cn L >O U > jLO> C W C7LL cn Ql C aa�cL0a.nan E 0 o 0N L a) Ocpa) � c)Uoo o o� Z ZZ� OYU_ -a u oU)LOaZZ LL 0 �� 0?NOrnca c ZO HQY N O U = O OC aDcN>.cUa)cm�mo�� O O> W O -,co QU O UODmO a)O NC Cc O= LL cE >>OmO C C Q CO C C O j X X Co — — (D C a) 7 m O O O O O Y 3 3 C C O U Z O C N C a) O O" O p p N 20 O (;}0 LL N= O O —j cn N a)pQQ N N N a) N p a L LL L L L LL = o oUiLU rn0� a) c E cm N E ' �2�� c ' i ' L)��-T c N E O V (A fn a CO L" (0 co i (0 a L> (o i L (0 -0 (0 •Q C -0 -0 K — Li co E (A LU Q E " E U Q Q a� a Q a) Q U o a o o o a Q' N LL¢ LL NUQU(..>UQ E L L Q (o = (0 X N (U (oN cd N co IN 2 2 Q W V a) L_ a) L_ a) L a) L_ a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) N N N N N LL LL LL LL LL_ LL LL LLL L_ LL L _ LL L_ LL L LL L LL L LL L_ LL L_ LL L LL L LL _ LL LL N LL Ly io V 0 a) N c -D m LL m m c > 3�m j a) m 'a 0 'a 0 -D 0Of N Co O O y fn 3 Jmma-J otS (o O N>` a) Of Of c>o m c�H N c •O .� c (n s c (n Y tp to N E L L L E c > 11J Q (o L (o LXUX�=J N— m (0 o , '— 0 c= •>— U' E _Q a- a d _a d v�i co Ln s cn N Q Q XXXX LO M 7C O 3 �X Z X (oU) NXX m CO N N UXXX%m� XXXXXX NN LO LO N co�C� T r M(D r N N LO r N 7C N N r M U N a) U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T N r N r N r N T N T N r N T N T N T N N r r N r N T N r N T N r N r N T N r N W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O f FIN N N N N N � N � N � N � N � N � N � N � N � N O CO CO O M M M Mq O O r QC) O T C) O T a r C) O r C) O r O C) r a O T O r C) 0 T CD 0 T C) 0 r C) 0 T C) 0 T CD 0 T C) 0 r C 0 r 0 T C) 0 T C) 0 T CD 0 T W 't LO (p 00 O q (O r N M (O M O O N (D m 00 C7 O Z aoaoCOaoWMMC) �• 't L!) — Ll) TTNNCMMCMC)LOLOLn LO Ln LL) Ln L() 0 LO Lf) L() LO l!) 00 T -t T �- N 00 T ('M T M r r r (O N (O r L(•) M N 00 N c•M M T T (O T a a c' - — tf�-L — -Lt L NO•DD)000n0Ooo L Mn cn a c U) c w a c a c a c a c a c a c a c wccLo c Q (o Q o Q (o Q Q o c� co c� c� ca m D W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) L a) O O 7 m CCU ?M m O O m m m m N a) m() O a) 0) N a) CO L L+ a) () a a LLLO ) )) L a) •— �Ec EEOOOEEEoEw osE cuEEQo�EEE_oE UUX= UU f°U� 0 L0 X=X=UUU Q N (.00'qt X� N T N N N N N O N Ln O J va-0-D-0-0-0-0-a'D_0v_0_0a c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T N O T N O r N O r N O r N O r N O r N O r N O T N O T N O T N O r N O T N O T N O T N O N N N N N N N N N N�� N N N N N r � ��(D� � L() (O � CO CO co 00 co 00 � m O r r M qt C) 0 T 6 0 T 6 0 r C) 0 r C) 0 r CD 0 r CD 0 r CD 0 r C) 0 r 0 0 T r CD CD r r CD CD r r CD 0 r r C) 0 r T CD 0 T N 0000 O CA000)OOOOOOOO T M L() 1- 00 W O N ('MR In O U) U) I-) u) LO LL LL O pp (O r (O T T N r T (p r 00 N r T T 0) r O T (p (yco (M I� M N C)N Lr) Il- r 00 T 00 r M V d m L a _ 0 m m Q (i z 0—N O 0 ° d Yaai c '� 0 o o a � � -0 -0 a p U� Q C aai � aai v a a) ca (a 0 'C � aai C aa) 'C CL c tf OC y >° M H Q. Q Q Q O O a�a.n O O O C p a'N N O fl'� N O Q 0 a 0 aQa 0 0 > C O C m C C 3 :3 C C C C Q C Q C 0 c -- c c N N w I� L rU co L ca L co L ca L U O C co L ca L �--' ca L ca L p a) 0 ca L cu O- ca U N ca a) Q O ° a Z N U a) m Da) Uc c c m ccc U O C-)° Z Z O o a mmcnv)mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm vwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwo co a) w �u o co w wD m 55==)=3=3 a) a) a) a) a) m a) a) a) a) m a) m a) m a) = a) = a) = v = (1) = a) = () = a) = V U O U D U U U N U v7 U U U O U U U O U O U O U O U U U u) U v7 U O U u) U U U U U N f) N U N U O U O CA co)a) W a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) m a) () a) () a) a) a) a) _N m c.i 7 >a>acua)aaa> -a a a)m >0L d mmmmm a om0> c o>m mm>mL > —> m ca L a L a L L myLL 0m a) a) a OJ co a) Ua a U -j UrCV^Lam m w a) a a a a a p a y>> m L p a O a a a O O a) 3 a) F- E E E E E c E E 3 v ofE E -E E 3 E a E0 o E O E O E O E O E O m EcE�— O >�•�E E°E°EYE 0 Q XUX xUX XUX XUX XUX XUX J O XU -00 p w c Xx XUO XXXX 0 UO XXm O U J O U U XXO N ao TN O 00 r N 7 N 00 M 0) Iq (0 `T (O I- N N CJ N N a C a C a C a C a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a C C C C C C C C C c C C C c c c C c c C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ------------ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CJ N N N N w C) N 0 N (D N C) N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N C) N 0 N C) Q C) N 0 N 0 N C) N Q� � �— � � 0 O 0 CA T C N M m C M 4 'd• V)((D(D L(� (O CO CO r— I� 00 w 00 00 m O C) C7 C) O a�� O T T r O r O r O T O T O r O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O N O CJ O Cl) O CO O CO O CO O r r r T T T r T T r T r r T T r T T T r T T r r O V LO I- CA O N COO r l[) 00 T N (fl I� CA N LO f� OE W T LnLn�n��nu)u)�n�n�n�n�n�n�n�n�n�n�n��nLnLn�n r r T N N N N N MMMM d' LO W) In 0�Z It w V ad OD U) Ix PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES June 10, 2021 The Mound Parks and Open Spaces Commission met on Thursday, June 10, 2021, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council chambers of the Centennial Building. Present: Chair Mills, Commissioners Stehlik, Kahn, Council Rep Pugh Absent: Commissioner Cordie Others Present: City Manager and Director of Public Works Eric Hoversten Public Present: 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Mills at 7:02 p.m. 2. Approval of Agenda Motion by Stehlik, Second by Kahn; Motion carried 4-0 3. Roll Call Chair Mills, Commissioners Stehlik, Kahn and Council Rep Pugh present, Commissioner Cordie absent 4. Approve May 13, 2021 Parks and Open Spaces Commission Minutes Motion by Mills, Second by Pugh; Motion carried 4-0 S. Comments and Suggestions from Citizens Present 6. 2022 Budget Process Recap Hoversten provided a recap of the budget calendar beginning for the Commission in April with the park visits and culminating with this discussion providing inputs to the staff on what priorities to include in the future year budget submission provided in preliminary form to the Council in September, discussed in workshop with the Council in October, and given final discussion and approval in December. Hoversten shared anticipated highlights for the 2022 budget year will be continued maintenance and spot improvements at individual park locations coordinated with major activities in flatwork repair/replacement at Surfside Park and wrapping up study work for the Harbor District improvements and beginning that work where overall work in the area allows. There are no additional substantial "focus' expenditure items in the budget forecast outside of these to fore mentioned activities. Parks staff will continue spot fixes and repairs to parks as conditions emerge and opportunities allow within the resources built into their normal operation and maintenance budget. There was no specific action needed to conclude this discussion item. 7. Preliminary Surfside Park Playground Option Review 0 Hoversten described the proposed improvements to the Surfside parking lot and sidewalks that are included in the Capital Improvement Plan. These activities have placeholder estimates included in future year budget and revenue projections and are well -situated in the budget from a feasibility perspective. The work projected for 2022 under the CIP would include resurfacing the parking lot, adding a sidewalk along the southeast edge of the lot, and providing separation curbing between the sand volleyball pit and the turfed buffer between the pit and planned sidewalk. Sidewalks leading to the depot building will also be replaced. Stormwater improvements to accommodate the added hardcover for this work and the completion of the shed -roof pavilion being donated by the Jaycees will also be incorporated into this project. Hoversten highlighted that all of these improvements are consistent with the 2018 Master Plan for the western side of the park. Hoversten explained that the 2022 budget projections did not include any estimated costs for replacement of the play structure or other recreational amenities. As financial strategy for these amenities would need to be developed and to do so, a parametric cost discussion was necessary. To facilitate this discussion, a notional design for the space consistent with the intentions in the Master Plan for "nature play' was developed using commercially - available equipment and furnishings. The conceptual layout included a vertical play assembly and an assortment of climbing stones and cable -ways sized to accommodate about 15 — 25 play participants. This was priced as separate components over artificial turf, wood chip or a hybrid of both as the play surface. Hoversten described that project costs using this example could be totaled depending on scope preferences that would range from only a single of the two proposed paly themes, or both; over the variety of surfacing combinations presented. These would drive estimated project cost ranging from just under $100,000 to $200,00 depending on selected intensities. The Commission discussed the variety of options that could be created in the mix -and -match pricing menu that was provided. During the discussion Council rep Pugh highlighted that the resulting park environment need to be multi -generational and all -season to meet community objective. Stehlik highlighted that more natural elements are a better fit for the "nature Play" theme identified in the Master Plan and that may motifs he has observed appear more animated than natural and fall short of that objective. The general consensus of the Commission was that the full combination of both structured, vertical play as well as the horizontal climbing features would create the most appropriate environment suitable for the park, and that the hybrid chip and artificial turf surfacing should be explored. This would result in an estimated project cost in the 170—180,000 range. Hoversten indicated that the next steps in this process would be to finalize the Capital improvement Plan elements of the work in the Park and discuss a financial strategy with the Council at its October financial planning workshop. Key elements of the financing strategy would likely include dedication of revenue from Harbor Wine and Spirits, and an outreach campaign to private service organizations and vendors for financial partnerships in the project. More information would be available after the discussion in workshop with the Council to be shared with the Commission following. Motion by Mills, Second by Stehlik to proceed with planning for both elements in the play environment over hybrid surfacing. Motion carried 4-0 B. Reports: 9. Adjourn Motion by Mills, Second by Kahn; Motion carried 4-0 Meeting Adjourned at 8:27 O PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES August 12, 2021 The Mound Parks and Open Spaces Commission met on Thursday, August 12, 2021, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council chambers of the Centennial Building. Present: Chair Mills, Commissioners Cordie, Stehlik, Kahn Council Rep Pugh Absent: None Others Present: City Manager and Director of Public Works Eric Hoversten Planning and Development Director Sarah Smith Planning Consultant Jody Rader Public Present: Council members Paula Larson, Jason Holt Planning Commissioners David Goode, Samantha Erickson Ben Landhouser, Lifestyle Communities 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Mills at 7:00 p.m. 2. Approval of Agenda Motion by Cordie , Second by Stehlik; Motion carried 5-0 3. Roll Call All members present 4. Comments and Suggestions from Citizens Present S. Jody Rader, Hoisington Koegler providing update presentation and discussion on concepts development and future community engagement for the Harbor District planning study Ms Rader opened her presentation providing a background on the previous survey and data collection activities that identified familiarity, common uses, use frequency age of users, and descriptions of "unmet needs' in the space. These feedback data were used to formulate the several concepts that would be presented in the next phase of the data gathering activities. The process for this was described for the Commission to include use of the on-line "social Pinpoint' tool that was going to be demoed during the presentation and several "pop-up" event on -site activities planned to occur during forthcoming Farmers' Market events. Ms Rader began her description of the three concepts with an overall characterization of each: a "Hometown Back Yard", "Events Space, and "Recreation Activity" collections of amenities and intensity. Each of these presented different ideas on how some core amenities might be enhanced or delivered, and added additional amenities to challenge thoughts and ideas surrounding the unmet needs and opportunities identified in the preliminary survey activity. Ms Rader then ran through each of the concepts and the specifics of how each was explained and characterized for the survey and on -site pop-up event data collection. Commission sought additional clarity on the characterization of each concept provided through the "scoring" indicated in each. Mr Hoversten explained that this was relative rating and that there was O not an objective scoring matrix or any ordinal extrapolation intended in the key provided with each concept other than to visually depict the intensity of each attribute present in each concept. Following the presentation on the process of the study and the concepts to be included in the feedback collection, the floor was opened for discussion and questions. Quorum notices for both Planning Commission and Council had been posted for the meeting and several participants from these bodies were present and asked to join the discussion. Council Rep Pugh emphasized the need for the amenities in the space to be multigenerational. She also highlighted the desire for the space to be a space for all seasons and not just summer usage. The commission emphasized the benefit of the Farmers' Market in the space and the need to plan for additional programming by other community partners like Community Ed. Ms Pugh challenged the group to specifically seek feedback from the several community activities providing services to our aging population to ensure their voice in the improvements. Council rep to the Planning Commission, Mr Holt asked of relative cost information would be provided with the concepts to help inform users of the costs associated with their feedback choices. Mr Rader described this data collection activity as a form of brainstorming and that feedback during this stage of development should not be filtered or shaped. That analysis would occur in future activities of the project and be informed by the feedback gained here. Mr Goode, Planning Commission Chair, asked about timeline for doing the work of the finalized Plan. MR Hoversten explained that some of the activities in the final Master Plan may be executable independent of progress on the adjacent development site; but others may depend on progress and completion of adjoining activities. There may also be synergies in doing some of the work cooperatively with the developer. We can anticipate a 24 — 30-month build process for the development once ground is broken for the site preparations. Mr Holt asked about funding for the work. Mr Hoversten described the financial structure for the Transit/Harbor district as it was established. Dollars levied, revenues, and expenditures are tracked for this district separate from the rest of the city budget under the purview of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and Council. The revenues from sale of lands would be booked against these separate accounts and be available for use to cover costs for improvements in the space. Hoversten also described that separate from these forthcoming costs, the city has been required to levy additional property tax to residents to cover the bond payments take with the initial area site improvements that anticipated tax value improvement was supposed to cover- so the area is in debt to the city and perhaps not all of the sale proceeds should be consider "pass through" budget for this project. Minimally the cost to prepare the land for sale should be recovered to the accounts. Ideally, the project budget will be funded by proceeds from the sale in some amount less than total; as to be determined by the Council as cost profiles come into clearer view. Mr Goode asked for further clarification on the Council direction to proceed with plans for the space that included closing and removal of Auditors Road. Hoversten described the process of discussion between the developer, staff, Planning Commission and Council. Significant feedback on the development planning applications was provided by the Planning Commission that the Council should consider removal of Auditors Road from the space to enhance the usability and character of the remaining public spaces. Specific action to support this was included in the revised vacation / * language requested by the County that included specific reference to removal of Auditors Road as constructed and traveled. Hoversten highlighted the several discussions on other matters — particularly the discussion on potential improvements to the Dakota Trail Crossing adjacent to this space had included clear discussion and direction to staff to consider alternative uses of the space to the existing roadway. Mr Mills asked how long the on-line survey would be kept open for users to use. Hoversten identified that the two planned pop-up events were to be held in October and that logically the on- line tool would be held open through the end of October minimally. Ms Kahn asked about getting the word out for the survey and events. Hoversten identified using the City notification messaging tool, the City web page, on site signage and signage in other high -use park areas of the community. The Farmers' market would share out the announcement of the pop- up events to its followers and several of the community's service organizations (WCC, Rotary, Gillespie, Etc) would be asked to do similarly to canvas as much of the community as possible. Ms Cordie asked if the Commission could participate in the pop up events. Hoversten agreed and indicated that leading into the schedule dates he would send around some scheduling coordination information so that the Commission could avoid quorum, participants could plan around weekend obligations, etc. Mills asked how the Commission should wrap up its discussion for the evening. Hoversten suggested a motion to approve the proposed concepts and public engagement plan for the Harbor District Master Plan. Motion by Mills, Second by Stehlik to accept the concept and engagement plan as presented. Motion carried 5-0 6. Reports: 7. Adjourn Motion by Mills, Second by Cordie; Motion carried 5-0 Meeting adjourned at 8:45 MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 5, 2021 Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Goode, Kevin Castellano, Jon Ciatti, Jake Saystrom, David Goode, Jason Baker, Drew Heal, Jason Holt, Allen Andersen, Samantha Erickson Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jen Holmquist. Members of the public: Steve Shoop and Nancy Rigelhof-3780 Enchanted Lane, Minnetrista, Ed Rockwell-4888 Edgewater Drive, Mound APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Baker to approve the agenda as distributed; seconded by Saystrom. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW OF SEPTEMBER 7, 2021 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Baker to approve the September 7, 2021 meeting minutes as written; seconded by Heal. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS PC Case No. 21-07 - Review/recommendation of proposed amendments to City Code Chapter 129 (Zoning Ordinance) and Zoning Map for consistency with 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Note: Tabled text amendments and proposed rezoning of property at 5084 Three Points Blvd from September 7, 2021 meeting) Applicant: City of Mound Trapp presented zoning code updates. She outlined the status of the Part 1 updates of the rezoning process and reminded the commissioners about the topics that had been tabled at the last meeting. One item that was tabled was the proposal for 6 properties in the vicinity of Three Points Blvd and Finch Lane to be rezoned to R-2 for consistency with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Comp Plan guides this area as medium density residential. The area was guided as such because the surrounding area is all residential and the scale of the properties in only about 25,000 sq. ft. for all 6 properties combined. The area is near the end of the Three Points peninsula. The 2811 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft commercial uses have varied over the history of the property. The property owners of one of the properties had requested a decision be delayed so they could discuss the proposed rezoning with the Planning Commission. Trapp outlined discussions staff had with the attorney and the assessor's office. The assessor confirmed that the properties are currently being assessed at two rates, residential and commercial. The City Attorney stated that rezoning is a legislative act. We can't make choices based on maximum profit or value for a property owner. Trapp explained the rezoning is required to make this area consistent with the guidance in the comp plan. The comp plan guides this area as residential. If a recommendation that is consistent with the comp plan is not reached to re -zone as proposed, the area will need to be changed to C-1 as the current B-2 zoning will no longer exist due the other zoning updates that were recently recommended for approval. In addition, if there is a desire to retain the properties as commercial the comprehensive plan will need to be amended for consistency, per state statute requirements. Castellano asked about notices sent. Trapp says for this particular property, only the property owners were notified in advance of the last meetings. Surrounding properties will be notified as part of the formal public hearing process. Goode asked for clarification on the recommendations sought. Trapp noted R-2 is the residential option and is how the area is guided in the approved 2040 Comprehensive Plan, C-1 is the commercial option, and the comprehensive plan would need to be amended, in addition to the zoning code. Baker asked if all 6 properties need to be the same or if they could be split. Trapp explained that the entire node should be treated similarly given its size. In addition, "spot zoning" is not favorable. Trapp confirmed the properties are assessed as both residential and commercial, with the parking lots being commercial. Rezoning the area will not prevent the properties from continuing the current commercial use. Goode asked the audience for comment. Nancy Rigelhof and Steve Shoop-3780 Enchanted Lane. They own the property at 5084 Three Points Blvd. Shoop stated that the property is not positioned at the end of a dead-end street. The road does end at a dead end, but is blocks away from his property. The property has always been a commercial property. It was built, as such. He believes the shop part of the property was never intended to be residential. He noted the rezoning is the city's decision and this is not something they requested. He explained that they want to keep it as is. Shoop said the tenants at the other properties are not local and he wonders if they have even read the notices or dug into the details. O Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Goode asked what the current use is. Shoop stated the property includes a small apartment building and the commercial space is used as hobby space and he runs a painting and wallpaper business from the building. He said part of the report stated the property is not being used to its full potential and he believes this change will take away the option. He believes the property is unique. He recognizes it's a residential area all around it but he has never had any issues with the residential neighbors around him. He noted that one B-3 property in the city has been changed to Commercial. He hopes the commissioners will recommend his property remain commercial. Baker noted that the current use can continue and he asked if the intent is to sell it as a commercial building. Shoop says he hopes to continue to use it, as is, and then he would sell it, as a commercial property, eventually. Andersen asked if they brought up these concerns when the 2040 Plan was being developed. Rigelhof stated they were not notified at that stage. The first they knew of it was in August when they got the letter. Ciatti asked if there is an option for the area to have a residential and commercial zoning, or if they must be one or the other. Trapp said if the commission decided to allow both, Staff would suggest it be in the Mixed -Use Corridor District and that, like the C-1 District, would require a Comprehensive Plan amendment because the area was identified as residential in the comp plan. Castellano asked for clarification on the use. Zoning the properties as R-2 will be consistent with the comp plan as approved and the owners can continue to use the property exactly as they are. Trapp confirmed. The property can continue as is, and a new owner could continue to use it for commercial use as long as the new use is similar in terms of scale. i.e. number of employees, or customers. The intensity of the commercial business could not increase. This can continue indefinitely unless or until the use is changed to residential for a period of at least one year. It would not have the option to go back to a commercial use if that were to happen. Goode asked for clarification, if it is currently used as a painting and wallpapering business would a new owner have to use it as a painting and wallpapering business? Trapp said a different kind of business would be allowed, it would just need to be similar in scale. For example, it is likely that the City would determine that a restaurant or coffee shop is not the same scale. Goode pointed out that the Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council and council will be the final vote. C-1 and Mixed -Use Corridor will require a comp plan amendment. Mixed use would have architectural standards placed on any new development. 2813 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Baker asked what the setbacks would be if it were a residential parcel. Would a house even conform to setbacks without a variance? Smith offered that front setbacks are standard 20 feet, side setbacks, if a garage is included, are 6 feet, rear is 15 feet, and one side setback must be 10 feet if there is no garage. Baker noted that on this lot it would be a very small house. Trapp confirmed. Saystrom asked if the property is zoned C-1 and someone wanted to build a house, would that be a permitted use. Trapp said no. Saystrom noted the flexibility the property owners are looking for would only be available with the Mixed -Use Corridor district. Erickson wondered if the loss of value has been researched and if not, she thought the property owners could try to gather that information to show the City Council. Trapp noted that the city is unable to gather that info. Goode invited the residents back to make comment. Rigelhof noted that she hopes to make it mixed -use. Shoop believes the value is in the uniqueness of the property. He feels like something is being taken from them because the city is simplifying the zoning code. He noted the current taxes are split between residential and commercial, which is higher due to the commercial. Trapp noted that the consolidation of the B-1, B-2 and B-3 districts has no bearing on what is being proposed for this property. The zoning changes are all happening at the same time. The reason this node is being rezoned is so that the City can make the zoning consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Holt wondered how difficult it is to change to mixed use. Trapp noted a Comprehensive Plan amendment requires Met Council approval. She doesn't anticipate that the Met Council will have issues, it will just take staff time and resources and stall the process a little. Trapp suggested that the City should do whatever is the right thing and asked the commissioners not to factor the amount of work that would need to be done into their decision. Ciatti pointed out that resident feedback on recent proposals has been "we want commercial" he believes the mixed use may be appropriate. He thinks encouraging local business in town would be in line with what residents say they want. MOTION by Holt to recommend the City Council rezone the property to Mixed Use Corridor; seconded by Ciatti. Yay- Ciatti, Saystrom, Baker, Erickson, Goode Nay -Heal, Andersen, Castellano Commissioners who voted against the motion were asked for any comments they would want to share with the City Council. 0pl Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Castellano stated that even with the rezoning to residential the current use can continue as is. He doesn't believe the surrounding residents would want a Mixed -Use - Corridor in this area. He also doesn't see a reason to stray from the comp plan, especially considering the location within a residential neighborhood. Andersen stated he thinks it's important to follow the guidance that is already approved in the comp plan. Since the current use can continue and because a bigger business can't go in there, he thinks its an unnecessary stray from the comp plan. Heal stated he agrees with Castellano and Andersen's comments and additionally he believes it's an odd place for a business to be. He believes there is a place for commercial and a place for residential and commercial doesn't seem to fit here. Because the current use may continue, he believes it should be R-2, as guided by the comp plan. Trapp returned to the other topic that was tabled previously. She noted that Multi -Family Parking standards have been consolidated. This was tabled previously because of a few standards that were being proposed. Trapp outlined current and proposed parking standards for a multi -family use. Currently, the R-3 standard is 2.5 parking spaces per unit, with one being underground. Currently the FED district says 2 spaces per unit with 1 being enclosed. She gave examples of how a different mix of studio, 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom in a multi -family building can dramatically change the amount of parking required under the proposed standards. Trapp outlined the proposal to move from a per -unit standard to a per -bedroom standard. The per -unit applies the same standard whether the unit is a studio or a two -bedroom. She believes that standard is too high based on parking studies. Trapp also presented alternative language for the underground parking standard. The proposed new language is "Enclosed parking shall be provided unless determined infeasible by the project engineer, based on the location of the water table, grades or similar factors." Trapp noted the footprint of the building is the footprint and it is challenging at times due to layout to provide the minimum required number of underground spaces. Trapp noted that if developers have to meet an arbitrary number of spaces, they may have to adjust the mix of units to meet the standard but the market may not support that mix and it may not make sense. Heal questioned the proposed requirement giving one space to a one -bedroom, stating that a couple living in a one -bedroom would only get one space. Trapp said that is the minimum required and a developer could do more. Heal believes the developer will only meet the minimum requirement. Trapp doesn't believe that is necessarily so and cited an example of a project that is providing more than required. 2815 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Heal asked if other cities are using this formula. Trapp said this is a newer approach and while it's not standard in surrounding urban areas yet, she is starting to see the conversion. Goode wonders why % space would be required. Trapp believes that not every resident will have a car and 100%of the spaces won't be used 100%of the time. She noted it's a starting point and welcomed discussion. Ciatti noted the proposed amounts seem to be a tool to limit density. Goode asked how a studio renter can use % of a space. Trapp said in her experience, developers often will separate the parking from the unit so that tenants can chose whether or not they want enclosed parking. This results in not every available space being rented as some tenants are happy with surface parking. Castellano believes a developer won't necessarily build only the bare minimum and thinks having this guide is helpful. Saystrom had an issue with the ambiguous language. Baker asked if the "project engineer" is the developer or the city. Trapp said it would be the developer similar to how other development standards are approached. She explained the developer would have to demonstrate why they can't do it. Commissioners discussed addition of language that city staff would have to agree with a developer's reason. Trapp said that is implied as the city has to approve every aspect of a project but welcomed additional language to make it clear. MOTION by Ciatti to recommend City Council approve parking regulations that staff presented in September and October, with modified language discussed at the Planning Commission meeting; seconded by Baker. MOTION carried unanimously. PC Case No. 21-11 - Review/recommendation of proposed amendment to City Code Chapter 42 (Nuisances) related to lighting Applicant: City of Mound Smith outlined the history relating to lighting and glare. Lighting is covered in zoning but these matters can take place as a nuisance. Council directed staff to look at the regulations and add additional lighting/glare language in the nuisance code. This is not a zoning amendment. No notices are required. But the city attorney recommends we should have a hearing, publish the notice and post it on the website in a zoning -like process. Smith outlined how neighboring properties will be notified if this amendment is recommended. Smith fielded questions regarding specific language in the proposal. She stated the language was provided by city attorney and could be revised. Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Ciatti asked if this change would make this issue enforceable by police. Smith responded that if this goes into effect it would be a misdemeanor enforceable by the City Attorney. Holt said he visited the example site and he passed a photo. Heal asked what bay this particular home is on. Holt declined to answer specifically but said it is quite bright. Smith confirmed only that it is lighting casting over water. Ed Rockwell-4888 Edgewater Drive. He stated he is a neighbor of the example property. He specified the light in question is on a commercial light pole about 20 feet from the lake and directed over the water. He said a cousin that lives across the bay can read a book by the light. He noted the light is on every day about 30 minutes after sunset and stays on until 3 in the morning. Erickson asked if Rockwell has spoken to the owner of the light. The resident confirmed he has attempted to speak to him but he was met with hostility. Rockwell's cousin has also attempted to discuss it with the owner of the light, but she was met with hostility. He believes city staff has had conversation with him and also got nowhere. He hopes the city code can be changed so they can enjoy their own property. He added they have been dealing with this for at least 8 years. MOTION by Baker to recommend City Council approval of the proposed amendment to City Code Chapter 42; seconded by Erickson. MOTION carried unanimously. PC Case No. 21-12 - Review/recommendation of proposed amendments to City Code Chapter 129 (Zoning Ordinance) related to fences and food trucks Applicant: City of Mound Trapp introduced Part 2 of the zoning update process. These issues have been identified based on conversations with planning commission, city council or staff. The code is being clarified regarding fences. She discussed the current code and the reasons staff is recommending a change. A corner lot currently can't have a fence higher than 4 feet along any roadway. This change would allow a 6-foot fence next to unimproved fire lane, alley, or street meeting minimum standards. MOTION by Baker to recommend City Council approve language provided by staff; seconded by Castellano. MOTION carried unanimously. Trapp introduced proposed language to allow food trucks on private property. There is currently language in the code prohibiting food trucks from showing up at public parks and that portion will not change. This update pertains to the use of food trucks on private property. Trapp outlined the suggested standards. The intent is not to significantly increase the use of food trucks in the city, but rather allow for private events on private property where the food will be served to guests of the event, not the general public. 2817 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Smith reiterated this language is for private properties. Businesses and special events in public areas would still need to follow the procedures for public lands. MOTION by Baker to recommend the language in the proposal be adopted; seconded by Holt. MOTION carried unanimously. Old/New Business A. 2021 Planning Commission Member Term Expirations —Goode / Heal / Castellano B. Request to cancel Tues., November 2, 2021 regular meeting and schedule special meeting to be held on Tues., November 16, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. due to school board election. MOTION by Baker to cancel the November 2, 2021 regular meeting and schedule a special meeting to be held on Tuesday, November 16, 2021; seconded by Andersen. MOTION carried unanimously. C. City Council liaison / Staff report Holt updated that the City Council decided not to act on the ATV discussion. The use of ATVs is still not allowed, but won't be enforced. The Fire Department Dance will be held on Saturday, October 9. This takes the place of the Annual Fish Fry this year. Holt updated that he had a discussion with Representative Kelly Morrison regarding the water. She is going to look into funding sources. The Mayor met with Congressman Dean Phillips and he will look into it on the federal side, as well. Holt encouraged emails and calls to the representatives to keep the focus on the Mound water issue. Holt also discussed with Representative Morrison the bike path issue. Discussions will continue with Hennepin County and Three Rivers. Smith noted public hearings for rezoning and text amendments took place with City Council. They were approved, with the exception of the tabled items discussed tonight. Staff and parks department attended Farmers Market and spoke to folks about the parks concepts in an attempt to put together a plan for the park. The survey requesting public input has closed and Smith said the hope is to have a plan together by the end of the year. Smith updated on the progress of the development projects that are in the works. O : Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Sunset View Villa went to council and was approved. Final plat will go straight to council. Ciatti requested an update on the Williams Building on Commerce. Smith updated that the property is under a restoration agreement. The agreement states that certain obligations need to be completed by the end of the year to avoid abatement activities. Work was started on the front of the building without a permit. The final vision for the property is not clear, however it is almost certain to come before the Planning Commission because the property has no parking. Holt asked Smith how soon the commission could expect to see additional nuisance ordinances addressed in regards to storage. Smith suspects that will be in November and the topics will be broken up in parts, similar to how the re -zoning is being addressed. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Baker to adjourn at 9:10 pm; seconded by Heal. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jen Holmquist 0 • These were the Twin Cities' top - performing municipal liquor store operators in 2020 By Brianna Kelly — Reporter, Minneapolis / St. Paul Business Journal Nov 8, 2021, 3:09pm EST Alcoholic beverage sales skyrocketed in 202o amid the Covid-19 pandemic. Unsurprisingly, that translated to record -breaking profits for Minnesota's city - owned liquor operators Net profits for all operations totaled $36 million, an increase of $8.2 million, or 29.2%, from the amount generated in 2oi9, according to the Minnesota State Auditor's 202o analysis of municipal liquor store operations. Over the past five years, net profits from the state's 213 municipal liquor stores have risen almost 58%. In total, Minnesota's municipal liquor stores generated $41o.6 million in sales in 2020, accounting for a 10.3% increase from the $312.1 million generated in 2019. It was the 25th consecutive year of record sales, according to the report. Only 18 of the 119 Minnesota cities with municipal liquor operations are located within the Twin Cities metro area, but they represent 32.9% of the total sales and 29.1% of the net profits. They generated more than $135 million combined in 2020. In the seven -county metro area, municipal liquor stores reported a roughly 15% increase in net profits to nearly $10.5 million, up from about $9.1 million in 2019. "Municipal liquor operations located within the metro area are considerably larger and more profitable than their Greater Minnesota counterparts," State Auditor Julie Blaha said in the report. "Metro area municipal liquor operations averaged $3.6 million in 2020, compared to average sales of $1.6 million for all Greater Minnesota operations." Lakeville was the highest -grossing operator in Minnesota, with about $18.3 million in sales, but its 9.1 % profit margin put it in the middle of the pack among the Twin Cities operators. Wayzata — which has both on- and off -sale operations — was one of the worst - performing Twin Cities operators, with only $5.3 million in sales and a o.8% profit margin. It fared better in 2019, when it garnered approximately $6.5 million in sales and had a 4.6% profit margin. Here are the top municipal liquor operations in the Twin Cities seven -county metro area based on net profit margin. Sales are in parentheses. 1. Apple Valley: 13.3% ($1o,878,589) 2. Savage: 11.7% ($7,386,979) 3. Mound: 11.5% ($3,838,205) 4. Saint Francis: 11.1% ($2,777,61o) 5. Rogers: 10.9% ($4,451,110) 6. Eden Prairie: 10.1% ($11,711,56o) 7. Lakeville: 9.1% ($18,262,397) 8. Fridley: 8.8% ($6,7o8,539) 9. Lexington: 8.6% ($4,255,639) 1o.Farmington: 8.2% ($5,347,194) 2821 M.' � BUILDING RESTORATION 2396 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minnesota ON OR iw eeIRmPO 1. M[AAOo�rNIDI A. H.eP .mwu.wro NO �RD�D �R NrtPm wtuNARp REFERENCE-ENCENNCESYMBOLS '�—Curet '—� Axa1 PMW N me- � y� 11j1_ V` F rowlwX 1T' PIWzI� �X,e '� R [TIME, d Eo NTD L tzmmianv� TU DIMNNIDxlnavyN E�d"n.BtaASK CODE REVIEW BINIDIW CDRR D ugNROIA sT^TE WIIDIND WDE ccx4AVATm1 CWE POP RS (CNAPT:A X-REONRS) 2DID YRR¢SOTAWSA tE FlRE WDE DD2D YMNEBOTA ACCF59BRltt c00E TCID NINNESOTA MUHAH CAL TO2C NMXE90TA MECNANIGL ! NR GS CEBE MINNESOTA ELECTRIC CURE WSDIRS CRDW 'B' (Oc 6ECTUN .11 =L ANCA' aus9PICATW !=RC ARR: A.ASB Y WSTO TNOCN TIPD .A- AREA ! ..I-D U SF. I SIRR DEC lAB1E fiDR.]) —PANT A. BUNNRS - A.AW SF/I6D - b DCCUPANIS ERRS REWIRED. 1 > AP OCEVPANIS (T I COVVDN P OF ESSM ..11) IDC FEET < DO (TABLE 1W6; A uISTANCO o. POET (TAB IDIT.E) YSIN -RES o OR USE TADIE 22U21 DUBN_ . DO DCWPAx1B BI TOILET PER 26 OCCUPANTS 1. TIE 1.1 SD I UV FEW w OCCOFANTB FG T1E W BO URINNNO FWI — (IBC TAME aP T) NOT REWIRED IF DCCUPANI9 <SE) SPANCL E N IIDC TABLE 22021..) NOT REWIRED IF —ANTS < W) WATFA91m RSIRICR u NANA CREEW NO WAVER REWREO K.N. CITY x 114. B-1 1 RFLB VODFY EIBSTNB DIMENSWS AND CCHDI _ NOTFY ARCHITECT CP ANY 1O F INSFECT SCA AND RmNR AS REWIRED YnTH OCR_RE ROMND WIFWULi REDUCE MI59NC RWENDRm NSR SEINIDI OIRAFRICR AND FIELDfUSHINE A51¢R6AILT POR W 'NONT WWf. 11' FRONTAS IOU—nIxTFIR3 E WRRFNT MIDWC CCDERPEWWEYENTS u�T ALL RE TALL NElA1TIMXDONSC AND .L HVAC _K TO BE DBW/BNlO BY ODFNSm 1E N.C.1—OF MEIN NIDWDANSNNE NI SlIlY1E MECHANICAL CONIRACTRR. SUBMIT NECESSARY DRAWINGS TO MTOR WI1DR10 PEPNR�.1/p�R1D INSTALLAIIDN WIDE IS ROCK -UP 9AYFIE CRISTBUCTW of HER VENEER WALL X. TO I�NDAIR:AACFFTPIERL EAN. uC.- VASIT�TEO F BINODCovtRAcidl. S11BWR NECE—BAN, ORAINBB NCI ON FOR SIR ANKI FORMIC TCF'NRNXCE WN�0111UWNS AG SHI L REMAIN AS FlNAL C1311 CTUN. IL F1EElRICAL RORR - BE GEE"/SUIID SY OCFNSN OPAMNCS 1O CITYLFOR BMWING PERMIT NEC65N(Y IA ALL LLRNN6HEN INIERION AND P BOARD TO BE TAFED, 10 BE B ASSOCIATES. INC. DATDC COURSES R, 2DW! AE 21. B ALL sE1EC1Eo RYACMItTINS. C0.DRS AND lE.' 1. CLEAN UP NL WNSRDICTDN OEBRIs DAILY AHD RL.N REPN.01 6 RDWINNER IN REPORT AS REWIRED 1HDFWDNLY AT PROEM CWPIEIION N MEET S1RLkNRAL EXRHEER'S APPIIOVAL ' BEPR.VE1FWIOR UENT OINISH VIN WBEPT1 ART HEBE PEAII T AS 1ENAM T. LTD. FOR REAIDVALM1. OF NAEARDCUS NAIEIUALS. NRWAflE SNAIL MEET psvOBAL OF HAEARUWS MATEMALS REWIREMENIS Q THE STATE OF M NRDTA B. IAOVE TEIIALF FROW SITE RECRADE IEE RI CORRREC, BRNNAGE AWAY FROM BURLNNO, S. REPAIR SUNXEN RICER— AT BNLDINO FRONT. A . - f ''WsW✓.H 'e Via. ^ a',4' 3 T eap Y` V M i IO we y ..y e4 V ' hK' Sim ;9 . EH&I Lnn ^ Hw: TBDaDlaoxs AM.R.A.a r2 e.I l.. • ut ..yA.r.. Awl.t ue. ti Hn u NOTE: CONTRACTORS TOVERIFY ALL EWIRTINO CONDRIONS IN FIELD PROJECT: BUILDING RESTORATIO 2OSBC IwE�MN RW. MWR ISSUE: I. REVISIONS: L�HEETITLE:E SHEET E REVIEW SHEET NUMBER: T-100 Arch c re F-1, WEST ELEVATION COWM— —Rl� —EXISTING IN FIELD o po ___ BASEMENT PLAN SOUTH ELEVATION 10 SCALE: 118".1'-D' \t!,U) SCALE: 1/8"=1'-D" PROJECT. BUILDING RESTORATIOMounq MN ISSUE: EAST ELEVATION � SCALE: . . . . .................. REVISIONS: SHEET TITLE: DEMO F'L4N FIRST FLOOR PLAN s NORTH ELEVATION ER: %tf?) SCALE: 11 BASEMENT PLAN -101 SCALE: ME, FIRST FLOOR PLAN TZ WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4"=l'-0" a SOUTH ELEVATION 101 SCALE: 110"=V-0" s EASI ELEVATIUN _ ALE: 1/B'=1'-0" I I K-61 NORTH ELEVATION 1 SCALE: TH k Lnn hvv-v��mmmsl.nn i damnwi. r��w u.�w Imp NO E: CDNTPACTOR9 TO VERIFY ALL —STING CONDITIONS IN FIELD PROJECT: BUILDING RESTORATIO zaee Mo.und. M... MN eNa MN ISSUE: REVISIONS: iuwo SHEET TITLE: FLOOR PLANS & ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A-101 I ROOF PLAN -i SCALE: A A� � ■!■■■I !`i z ROOF DETAIL R1 -1 D2 SCALE: AFTER DAMAGED STUCCO IS REMOVED AND STRUCTURE IS EXPOSED NOTIFY ARCHITECTIENGINEER TO EXTENT OF SUBSTRATE DAMAGE s STAIR SECTION STUCCO REPAIR -10 SCALE: .=•ttNo,d«m.,, STUCCO REPAIR- WOOD ii 2 NOTE: GONTHW4NG TO MONO IN EY19PN0 CONDITIONS IN FlELO PROJECT: BUILDING RESTORATION 2T98 Commerce BNd Mo�nC, AIN ISSUE: vm� REVISIONS: 0 SHEET TITLE: ROOF PLAN SHEET NUMBER: A-102 PRSYAIX�I�T DE C? M O 7 O O --HIND 2 WINDOWS 3 FRAMES F,AsxINo SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0' SCALE: 1/4"-1'-0" �—ADHERED ROOF MEMEMNE GNT �. EnsnND RAFTERS EXISTG WALL m R1 CMU INFILL 11111 x^s"IN° ALUM FRAME ) WELDED = IXlsnxD uND JasT- HM FRAME I - C CO RC•MO MEOALIDN /� YL12 NEADEA F FG MEMND� s DOOR DETAILS SCALE: 3/4'=1'-0" o A i0 E LJ \/ s]oNEsu °i N PT 6RL N ANCHOR e°LT-sEE aTRI1CT FIA$gN° EWFLODRRHTGA.—OREDILUTa1THI—ESB) r/s WALL DETAIL@ DOORS 190LAn0N JT N E109nNO WD fLODfl SCALE: 314"-V-0' 4 DOORS SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0' DOORI FRAME RATING HARDWARE N 512E TYPE MATERIAL FINISH 1 GLAZING TYPE I MATERIAL I FINISH R, S'A•ffi-DY1-3N• 1 INSUL HM PNNT - F3 HM PAINT LOCKSET 1 ,01 ]•-D•RT-Pp2' 1 AIUM AN0012E FIJIL F1 ALUM I ANODIZE DEADGOIT 3'-DYT-0Y2• I t1 ALLIA I ANOa2E FLU F7 I ALUM 1. ANODZE DEADGOLT e WALL UL I AIL (a) WUW SCA E: W4"=1'-0' EM—FON WALL IREPNRASREOD) erv.m L wwerv. m, AFTERSIDEWAINIS RENOVED Mw��pMnRAm Rw FlupvlP�uv AND STflVC1VRE IS IXPOSED NOTIFYARCIRECTIENOINEER wnynllnw _T—I MleyrtquC IFRDM �NON—.WINDS EDIFFFAENT maEe e I wiolvenxn uANwv env e� WEST WALL BASEMENT DOOR INFILL DOOR INFILL 1 WALL SECTION T WALL TYPES SCALE: SCALE: V-V-0' 201 SCALE: 1-1/211'-0" �4k .s Arch re PH: TE33]1�03E hpseml�®m Lnel Fyrw �I ..r is en H r NOTE: ALL EXISTING CONTRAON VERIFY ING CONDITIONS INFIELD PROJECT: BUILDING RESTORATION .—,MN M 2DS6BNa. Mood, MN ISSUE: REASIONS: RECIa Fn H� m SHEET TITLE[7: SECTIONS 8 DETAILS ]_ SHEET NUMBER: A-201 pD0F3HFwTHIND E%I31'D ROOF JOI EAST WALL SECTION -2D SCALE: 1"-1'-0" SCALE: 1/4'-1'-0' �3 t3UILUI U StU I IUN - UtN I tH t�P SCALE: 1/4'-1'-0" a tlUILUINb SLU I IUN - tAS I SCALE: 1/4'.1'-0" EH kAJ L211 PH: T63331-5025 Hpaertl�r mrJcl.nel IW "IIn�LL ........ _............ NOTE: CONNUCTORS TO VERIFY ALL E%ISTIND CONDITIONS IN FIELD PROJECT: BUILDING RESTORATIO 2396 MN GommebNQ Mount, MN ISSUE: REVISIONS: SHEET TITLE: SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER: A-202 I I I 1 I I I I I I\ % I I pb PRECAST COHCpETEgODF I I I� I I PH:783357-50E5 Apeartl�mmrstl.nel FA TW aryvr � �� ryr+AeA.n.�r.. r. H n NOTE: COTTDVERIFY EXISTING ALL E%I6TING IN0 CONDITIDN6 IN FIELD BUILDING SECTION -NORTH SCALE: 114--l'-D" I 1 1 -- I I I R P ROOF MEMBRANE. OAMAOEO POOFeHFATHNO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t j I PROJECT: BUILDING 1 i I I i i RESTORATION I I I I 2RS6 DDIggI - Grve. MBSRE, MN Nl'SPACE �NPIOPENIND TCHwG crnu i \ I ! ISSUE: Li L I Ll �1 BUILDING SECTION -SOUTH - SCALE: 1!4".i'-o' 1 v" 0.ARNNG E61LL REVISIONS: ORFMMB N Pt SILL � roan ALUM A AO THRESHOLD _ N ANCHOR Bd.T-6EE 61R FIA6HN0 EW0.0ORSNTGASHSQDREDIMATCHTHCNNESS) IASHNG NEW FLOORSHTGASREONREDIMATCHTHICNNESSI IONJT ISDIATIONJT — SRNBWDFLOOREWAtJ(,SONNI'P JST MESrGREoo)Y w E)OST6FIA JST (.—RSTS F-R.D) SHEET TITLE: AFTERSIDEWEMOVED AFTERSIDEW"DIREMDVEU BUILDING AND bTRUCTUPOSED NOnFYARCHIGIMEER AND67RUCTUREISEXPOSED NOTIFY ARCHTEMMNGINEER FgCONpT119�ME DIFFFAEM SECTIONS FROM DMWIFFEPENT SHEET NUMBER: ALUM DOOR THRESHOLD WALL DETAIL A-203 -2 SCALE: 1"-1'-0" .2 SCALE: 1"=1'-O' J m w U LY w 0 0 U ��veulws mol � ® 6M9. unw„aDo�oW anedrt�iu TMmea�D�nD.,.i 7Q> 11 4mmNE8 REIMINDER F oasnNa Brun 16 pOD Po9iDeuPPapi 1g 15 17 `p It 14 flrDREnEiRAnoN EE 13 m� oR"rcaNr"neriAewe 18 ITS 0 I �Hi en T W/VATCNIN6CMII 6 1 ' 0 flu IF11 ~ *�•.•—•• a 0 n A' ocr.e.um .L PHOTO #2 STEPPED WALL PHOTO #3 ORIGINAL BEAM TUCK POINT AND POST CONSTRUCTION Hkk .,Arch re FN: iSD iD,�D]b DV>vM�oomu,l.Del NOTE CONTRACTORS TO VERIF ALL MSTING CONDRIONS IN FIELD PRQECT; BUILDING RESTORATION Y3BD Camme,n SNd Wo ,MN ISSUE REVISIONS; SHEET TITLE: FOUNDATION PLAN SHEETS 1 ER. •: �TMv f- , ri F�..IasLn.l 1 ,•1 PHOTO #4 STEPPED WALL PHOTO #5 PHOTO #6 PHOTO #7 PHOTO #8 BETWEEN m M CRACK TUCK POINT BEAM WALL WALL OPENING WALL OPENING BUILT OUT WALL f 'L} I 1 • - NOTE •liwi � •L� .. GOND]AGTORS TO VERIFY ALl E%ISTINO CONDITIONS INFIELD PHOTO #9 BEAM ON POST 2ND PHOTO #10 REMOVE PHOTO #11 PHOTO #12 PH OTC #13 TEMP POST ST ON BLOCK MAY BE REMOVED AND REPLACE BLOCK WALL OPENING WALL OPENING MAY BE REMOVED PROJECT: BUILDING RESTORATION - savfi Comm... era. M.una. MN + ISSUE: 1. PHOTO #14 ORIGINAL PHOTO #15 TEMPORARY PHOTO #16 PHOTO #17 PHOTO #18 POST MAY BE REMOVED POST TO REMAIN STAIR INFILL BEAM ON WALL WALL OPENING REV151ON& ' ADD 2x6 POSTS @ 3211o.c. 77 liq!-'� SHEET TITLE.u, FOUNDATION j .,IWr•� PHOTOS 'r ''•+k=w. SHEET NUMBER: PHOTO #19 WALL OPENING PHOTO #20 PHOTO #21 WALL OPENING PHOTO #22 REAR OPENINGS S1-1 O PHOTO #1 REMOVE CONCRETE PAD PHOTO #5 ROOF & CEILING PHOTO #9 INSTALL NEW LINTEL PHOTO #2 REMOVE & REPLACE FLOOR SHEATHING PHOTO #6 STAIR FRAMING REMOVE & REPLACE PHOTO #10 WALL OPENING PHOTO #3 SOUTH WALL PHOTO #7 REPLACE DETERIORATING FLOOR SHEATHING PHOTO #4 BEAM ON WALL PHOTO #8 RUNNING BOND INFILL TO REMAIN FHR Lnn FH; T63331-6626 �po-aN®mmmel.nel NOTE: COMRRCTORS TD VERIFY RlL E%16TING CONDITIONS INFIELD PROJECT: BUILDING RESTORATION M—d, 2398MNNBlvd, MaunO, ISSUE REVISIONS: SHEET TITLE: FIRST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN PHOTOS SHEET NUMBER: S2-1 z.e 93u0 wau T Wuftu l!'I I! Ii 1_l_ �_� I w�I i III I► IL I I i111H11 4� I _ _1��J1 _I_ __LJ_ _�_ L _j_i_ _ L 1 L 11L 1,1 l� - f- r� fl0 6OP I �In2®]6:oc. _ OSa ulf®m'e.c r�^�"OS81lOOF6®FIExiWNG - © R°°f,lem°ve lal hdm maf. examine mntlllbn antl replene 11 reRalmd. 0 Remo uchgecl an woatl sbtla an...olbt , Farer d-N1 Dl.R & me dzE member,relerW emhl.IINtlabb 1lA8g1. Remove eltlII 6 6a �cE bNlem. ExaMne 6XflV ,b,dle I03Tenl l6rmll°d6n lnsNg new encher bdb w/6!B' B M36 %B• embetlmenl ®32'°.c 'EQ m Remove andnteaadaen firclfl°°r. Q 1 RDOF FRAfr11NG PLAN .� Rampve and np Gl6reny atltlltlpnal dam ge. I GV Al pw,end repaceexbtlngela4per' a 3FF(L ® Rlprepeelplank—ad Nalell LB•xe•x 319'(LLV)w/(2) 6l6'Mltl etlhaslve la• nun. a Erld— a.bdngdl. 0 End°ae°pening In exbtln9 wallwl g•bl°dkbmeltll exietlng. PmNtle amnalm !alum Nnp..1— ® f1n-md rclaWl, wag. PHOTO #2 1x12 BOARDS ON FILLER 2x12 PHOTO #3 PHOTO #4 LAP 2x1 D TO PARTIALLY 8" PRECAST SLAB DAMAGED JOIST. STAGGER (2)-ROWS OF 12d NAILS P 12"o.c. y� 2 i H A _Arch re hpaamJiggmmwalnel NOiE: IST TORSTO VERIFY AL V16A I\ N0 CONDITIONSINFpE%IELD PROJECT. - BUILDING RESTORATIO zaefi Cammeme BHd. Mound, MN ISSUE, REMSIONS SHEET WLE: FOUN!)ATION PLAN SHEET NUMBER: S3 o H A `Arch re PH: 16}9313626 nvo-ercn�wmaanel m� NO E AU UI CTONS TO VMIFY ALL EXSTING CONDNIONS IN FIELD PR0, ECT. BUILDING RESTORATIOts 2396 Commerce Blvd, Mound, MN ISSUE REVISIONS SHEET 71TLE: DETAILS SHEET NUMBER: S4 General punch list of items to be completed at 2396 Commerce Boulevard restoration Finish roof -to be completed 11-23-21 Stucco Sidewalk -if necessary Electrical Heat/vents Stairwell -close Windows and doors front and finish Block up doors Replace block repair wall Plumbing, if necessary Insulation New floor southeast corner Support precast Final grading RESTORATION AGREEMENT EXTENSION The City of Mound acknowledges that James Lang has made substantial progress (although later than contemplated) in completing the repair and restoration of his building at 2396 Commerce Boulevard, Mound, Minnesota under the terms the Restoration Agreement between the City and James Lang of April 2021. The City further acknowledges James Lang has requested an extension to complete the requirements of the Restoration Agreement through March 31, 2022, due to the late start associated with the delay in granting the required permits and the worldwide shortage of supplies, materials, and workers. The City of Mound hereby waives the December 31, 2021, completion and certificate of occupancy requirement of the Section 3.d. of the Restoration Agreement and extends all requirements through March 31, 2022. All other terms and conditions not inconsistent with this waiver and extension or which have not already been completed remain and are unchanged. December , 2022. THE CITY OF MOUND By: Eric Hoversten, City Manage