Loading...
2006-04-25~ r PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA ~~ ~I ~01~1 MOUND~HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 25 - 6:3Q PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Pale 1. Open meeting 2. Action approving agenda, with any amendments 3. Action approving minutes: April 11, 2006 1 4. Indian Knoll Manor Mana er's Monthl Re ort 2-12 g Y p 5. Discussion/Action on Transit District Parking Deck, including 13-22 consideration of contract with Walker Parking for deck design and preparation of construction plans and specs 6. Informational -letter from Dave Callister of Ehlers & Associates 23-24 on pre-payment of bonded debt 7. Adjourn MOUND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 11, 2006 The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for the City of Mound, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, April 11, 2006, at 7:25 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Chairperson Pat Meisel; Commissioners David Osmek, Bob Brown, Mike Specht and John Beise. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, Executive Director Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Carlton Moore, Cindy Reiter 1. Open Meeting Chair Meisel opened the meeting at 7:25 p.m. 2. Approve Agenda MOTION by Specht, seconded by Beise to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3. Approve Minutes MOTION by Beise, seconded by Specht to approve the minutes of March 28, 2006. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Action on approval to include Indian Knoll parking lot with the 2006 Street Reconstruction Project Cindy Reiter of Westport Properties presented a letter recommending approve to include the parking lot at Indian Knoll Manor with the 2006 Street Project. There. is currently $26,267 set aside in the capital fund account and the balance of $28,888 will be available October 1, 2006. MOTION by Specht, seconded by Beise to include this amount with the 2006 Street Reconstruction Project, as represented in the bids received. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 5. Adiourn MOTION by Specht, seconded by Beise to adjourn at 7:30 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Chair Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk .~~, -1- Mound HRA Indian Knoll Manor Property Manager's Monthly Report Apri124, 2006 Manager's Agenda • March Bank Statement • February Income Statement • Review of Bills Paid • Manager's Report Resident Council Report -2- WELLS FARGO BANK, N.Q. 1221 COURTYARD BUSINESS BANKING POST OFFICE BOX 8514 MINNEAPOLJS, MN 55479 ~I~I~~I~I~~~II~~II~~~I~~I~~~II~II~~~~I~il„~I~I~~I~~~il~ll~~ HOUSING ~ REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SPECIAL ACCOUNT CITY OF MOUND FINANCE DIRECTOR 5341 MAYWOOD RD MOUND MN 55364-1627 Page 1 of 3 Account Number: Statement Period: Image Gounf: ~~ss . ~ ~cos~~ 000-0033530 Mare 1, 2006- Mar 31, 2006 25 if you have any questions about this statement or your accounts, call: 800-225-5935 (1-800-GALL-WELLS). Your Accounts at a Glance Accaunf Beginning Depositsi Wifhdrawalsl Ending Type Balance Credits Debits Balance Basic Business Checking with Interest 8,400.90 24,884.33 - 21,759.22 1.1,526.01 000-0033530 News from Wells Fargo Basic Business Checking with Interest 000-0033530 Housing & Redevelopment Authorify Special Account Feb 28 Beginning Balance 8,400.90 Mar 31 Ending Balance 11,526.01 Deposits and Credits --------------------------------------------------------------~----------------------------------- ------------------ Posted Dafe Transaction Detail Amount Mar 06 Hud Treas 303 Misc Pay 030606 410962421860103 RMT'VV"099 1 1 4384"'"""hud Operafing Fund MN0740 4,990.00 Mar 06 Deposit 3,992.00 Mar 06 Deposit 3,954.00 Mar 06 Deposit 409.25 Mar 06 Deposit 223.00 Mar 06 Deposif 163.00 Mar 06' Proof-Ad1 Addition Err On Deposit Ticket 40.00 Mar 06 Deposit 25.00 Mar 15 Deposif 1,036.00 Mar ?5 Deposif 427.00 Mar 15 Deposit 1~• Mar 16 Deposit 266.00 Mar 16 Deposit 201.00 Mar 20 Hud Treas 303 Misc Pay 032006 410962421860103 RMT'VV"092280350"""""""`hud Capital Fund Program 9,000.00 Mar 31 Interest Paymenf 2.08 Confinued on next page -3- ~. ., ,.... . Page 2 of 3 1357 Housing & Rede~elt~pment Authority Accour-t Number: 000-0033530 Spgcia! ~4ccount Statement End Date!:- 03/31/0 Checks Paid. --- --------- -- ----- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - Check # Date Ampurat 22f)2.` Mar 01' 3,753:47 22D3,_ filar 1.5, 59.68; .: 2204:.. .. Mgr- 14 ~ 62.40 2 , lVlar 14; ; 103.00' 22f16 Mar 10 ~ 1,153.72 2207 Mar 15 157.07 2~(7$ Mar 20 5,347.10 22R9~ Mar 17 97:15 221 Q N1ar 16 44.00 221`1 Mar 14" 150.00 2212 Mar 22 432.88 2213 11i1~r 1.7 230.97 2214: ..:.Mar 21 133.13 Gap:. ii- Check Sequence Daily Balance Summary Date. Balance Feb 28 8,400.90 Mar 01, 4,647.43 Mar 06 18,435.68 Mar 10 17,281.96 Mar 13. 15,586.89 Nlar 14 15,271.89 Mar 15 12,953.46 Check # Date Amount 2215 Mar 16 52.27 2216 Mar 22 12.24 22,17 Nlar 93 193.98 2~~8' Mar 16 32.88- 2219 Nlar 21 333.76 2220 Mar 2.1 26.04 2221; Mar 20 47.92 _ 2222 Mar 20 273.77 2223 Mar 13 1,509.09 2225 Mar 15 3, 728.68 2226 Mar 28 27.84 2227 Mar 31 3,804.58 Date Balance Mar 16 13,291.31 Mar 17 12,963.19 Mar 20 16,294.40 Mar 21 15,801.47 Mar 22 15,356.35 Mar 28 ?5,328.51 Mar 31 11,526.01 Average Collected-Balance $ 13;557.17 Interest Summary Annual Percentage Yield Earned This Period` Interest Earned During This Period. Year to Date 1ntePesf and Bonuses Paid Total Interest and Bonuses Earned !n 2005 0.18% 2.08 5.81 26.35 Important=Q~n/ine.Lliscl+asure Notice for Qnline Customers-Only: W.e have wade some important changes to the E-Sign Consent and Online Access Agreement that you accepted when you started, using Wells Fargo Online or Wells Fargo Business. Q;nline Banking. For further information about these changes, sign on to your secure online session, select the Messages & Alerts tab, and read the message in your inb.ox titled: Important Chan,g~s to E=Sign :Consent and Online Access Agreement.. For Yctur~lr~terest' ,.: ~~ As, a welued..Wells Fargo custortx~r,..you can receive. daily account activity and atert notification by fax or email with Illfells. Fargo lt~arning: ~'Xpr-ess service ..Your first month:, oft .his convenient: service: is FREE and sign-up is quick and easy. Ta(k ,to,: yzur.W.ells=f_arga ba~eikee or ca/1.1=866=765=1568: for more details or to sign up. Thar-k -you for banking with ItlfelfS Fargo. -4- .. ~ r e MBIA Summary Statement March 2006 For more information, call MBIA Asset Management at (800)395-5505 Fax: (800)765-7600 : ~~~ ~NIpiG ~' 4MPL~Fur~ Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority Account Number: MN-O1-0258-2001 Account Name: GENERAL FUND Beginning Contributions Withdrawals Income Average Daily Month End Balance Earned Balance Balance This Month $504,464.61 $76,000.00 $0.00 $2,088.96 $569,260.52 $582,553.57 Fiscal YTD Endin 12/31/0 $501,135.55 $76,000.00 $0.00 $5,418.02 $525,691.86 $582,553.57 Account Number: MN-O1-0258-2002 Account Name: MOUND HUD Beginning Contributions Withdrawals Income Average Daily Month End Balance Earned Balance Balance This Month $1,816.56 $0.00 $0.00 $6.69 $1,819.98 $1,823.25 Fiscal YTD Ending 12/31/0 $1,804.56 $0.00 $0.00 $18.69 $1,813.82 $1,823.25 Total of all accounts Beginning Contributions Withdrawals Income Average Daily Month End Balance Earned Balance Balance This Month $506,281.17 $76,000.00 $0.00 $2,095.65 $571,080.50 $584,376.82 Fiscal YTD Ending $502,940.11 $76,000.00 $0.00 $5,436.71 $527,505.68 $584,376.82 March 2006 Page: 1 -5- 04/19/2006 08:19 6129290422 WESTPORT PROPERTIES PAGE 02 ~` Mound. MN Pubila Housins>I 2020 Commerce Boulevard Niound.IIAAN 5536 As 4F February 28, 2006 BALANCE SHEET ASSETS 111 ! 01 -Cash General Fund 5,085.65 11 i 700 ~ Patty Cash 100.00 112200 -Tenants Accounts Receivable 5.71 112800 - City of Mound 910.11 118200 - General Fund investments 1,'788.03 121100 - Prepaid Insurance 4,113.65 140002 -Development Gast 1,505,904.64 14DOD3 - Development Cost Contra (2,188.083.55) 140005 - Aocumlated D®preciatlon (1,560,807.5$) 140007 - Buildings 1,642,97Q.53 140008 - Furniture,Equipment,Machines-Dw-elling 33,551.6) 140009 - Furniture,Equipment,Machlnes-Admin 17,493A1 140016 - Land Improvements 22,640.04 14pD17 - Building improvements 578,072.55 140055 - Mod Cost Complete 682,158.91 140095 -Mad Cost Uncomplete 38,463.92 150E00 -Mod Cost Uncampiete Contra (6.803.00) "r07AL ASSETS SLlR,1~LUS AND UABILtTiES 211400 - Tenants Security Deposits (8,255.00) 211410 -Tenants Pet Deposits (2,700.00) 211499 - Security Deposit Interest {613.14) 212900 - Notes Pay Levy Fund (60,~~~) 2137DD - Payment in Lieu of Taxes (3,64$.18) 213701 -PILOT' Current Year (1,484.22) 280200 - HUD PHA Contribution (223,985.75) 280600 - Retained Earrings {181,027.56) Current Year Net Activity x,119.63 TOTAL SURF~LtJS AND LIABILITIES -6- 04/19/2006 08:19 6129290422 WESTPORT PROPERTIES PAGE 03 r" Mound, MN Pubttc Nou~ins~ 2020 ~t~mmerce Boulevard Mound. MN 55364 As Of February 28, X006 Statement of Operating Receipts $c ~xpenditurea 311000 - Dwelling Rents! 312000 - Excess Utilities Total Rental Income 381000 - Investment Interest/Gensral Funds 369000 - Other Income 802000 - Operating Subsidy Tote! Other Operating Receipts Total Receipts Expenses 411200 -Manager Payroll 414000 - Staff Training 415000 - Travel 417000 - Accounting Fells 417100 -Auditing Pees 419000 - Sundry-Administrative 419500 - Outside Management Total Administrsthre Expense 422000 -Tenant Services Total Tenant Services Expense 431000 - Water 432000 - Electricity 433000 - Gas 439000 - Other Utility Expense 439100 - Garbage Removal Total Utllitias Expense 441000 - Maintenance Labor 442000 - Materials 443000 - Contract Costs 448000 -Protective Services Total Maintenance Expense YTD Oyer Current Y'TD Prorated (Under) Activltlc B s Budget (9,049.71) (52,168.71) (53,758.35) (1,589.64) 0.00 0.00 (250.00) _ (250.00) (9,049.71) (52,168.71) (54,005.35) 1,539.64 (1.41) (11.53) (186.85) (155.02) (201.25) (712.00) (925.00) (213.00) (4,990. _,,,, (29,976.00) (28~7Q7.1~} 288.90 (5,192.66) (29,699.63) (29,798.75) 99.12 {14.,242 51 $68.34 (83.807.10) „1,938.76 3,102.50 14,453.00 14,250.00 203.00 0.00 0.00 333.35 (333.35) _ 0.00 0.00 250.00 (250.00) 150.92 1,536.60 1,266.85 288.95 5,500.00 5,500.00 3,125.00 2,375.00 180.72 8,088.44 10,737.50 (4,849,06) 850.00 3 400.00 0.00 3,400.00 9,784.14 30,978.04 29,962.50 7,015.54 0.00 '0.00 250.00 ~„ (250.00) 0.00 0.00 250.00 (ZisO,~) 174.23 689.72 833.35 (143.63) 1,398.37 5,506.11 6,066.85 (580.54) 0.00 10,304.81 15,291.85 (4,987.04) 597.49 4,398.83 4,233.35 165.48 0.00 1585.18 3,000.00 _(1,414.62) 2,570.09. 22.484.45 _ _, 29.425.00 ~.. _55,~ 3,493.50 15,591,00 17,787.50 (2,196.50) 79.62 2,557.91 3,158.65 (608.74) 175.24 3,356.98 4,025.00 (668.04) 0.00 0.00 360.00 (350.00) 3.748.36 _ 21~ 505.87 25.329.15 (3,523. -7- 04/19/2006 08:19 6129290422 WESTPORT PROPERTIES PAGE 04 Mound. MN Public Hot~inp ~Q20 Commerce Boulevard Mound. MN 55364 As Of Fsbruarv 28, 206 S#~Itement of Operating Receipts & ExpQnditures 459000 - Insurance 452000 - Pmts in -~eu Of Taxes 454000 - Employee Benefit Contributions Total General Expense Total Routine Expense Total Nanroutine Expense Total Expense YTD dv~r Current YTD Prorated (Under) ~(viri Ba~sce Bld.~9~ .~ 856.80 4,596.17 4,816.65 (220.48) 323.98 1,484.22 1,812.50 171.72 1,047.99 4,939.22 ~ 6,100.00 (1,180.78) 2,328.77 ~ 11,019.61 12.229.18 (1,209.54) 18,431.38 85 987.97 97,195.80 ~,.,11 07.83 o.oo o.oa o.oQ o.oo 18.431.36 85.987.9y _ 9780 111,207.83) -$- 04/19/2006 08:19 6129290422 WESTPORT PROPERTIES PAGE 05 '- Maund. MN Public Housins>e 20ZQ GommArce Boulevard Mound. MN 55364 As Of February 28, 2006 Budget Pragrese Report Percent YTD ~ l3alpnce Budget Budgst Income 311000 - Dwelling Rental {52,168.71) (129,020.00) (40)9'6 312000 - Excess Utilities 0.00 800.00 0°k Total Rental income (82,168.71) (129,620.00) 4096 381000 - investment Interest/General Funds (11.63) ('~•~) (3)°Yo 369000 - Other income 802000 - Qperating Subsidy (712.00) _ (29,978. (2,220.00) 88 897.00 (32)g6 (42)% Total Qther Operating Rscelpts (x9,699,83) (71,517.00) 42'~L Total Receipts 81 869.34 (x01,13.7.00 41y6 Expenses 411200 -Manager P2yroll 14,453.00 34„200.00 42% 414000 - Staff Training 0.00 800.00 096 415000 -Travel 0.00 600.00 096 417000- Accounting Fees 1,536.80 3,040.00 51°Yo 417100 - Auditing Fees 5,500.00 7,500.00 73% 419000 - Sundry-Administrative 6,088.44 25,770.00 24% 419600 - Outside Management 3,400.00 0.04 096 Tota# Adminiatrative Expense 30,978.04 71,970.00 43hL 422000 -Tenant Services 0.00 B00.00 096 Total Tenant Services F,acpense 0,00 600.00 OyL 431000 - Water B89.72 2,000.00 3496 432000 - Electricity 5,508.11 14,560.00 38°10 433000 - Gas 10,304.81 36,700.00 28°/a 439000 - Qtl~r Utility Expense 4,39$.83 10.160.00 43% 439100- Garbage Removal 1,585.t8 7200.00 22% Total Utilities Expense ZZ,494.45 70,820.00 32% 441000 - Maintenance E.abor 15,591.00 42,890.00 37% 442000 - Materials 2,557.97 7,600.00 349(0 4.43000 - Contrast Casts 3,356.96 9,660.00 35% 4aaooo - Pnatestive services a.oo 840.00 096 Tots! Maintenance Expense 21,SOS.87 60,790.00 3S?6 -9- ____ 04/19/2006 08:19 6129290422 WESTPORT PROPERTIES PAGE 06 Mound, MN Public Housino 2Q20 Commerce Boulevl~rd Mound, MN 553B4 As Of February 28, 2005 Budgex Progress Report Percent 451000 - Insurance 452000 _ Pmts In Lieu Qf Taxes 454000 - Employee Benefit Gantributlons ~"otal General Expenso Total l~ou#ine Expanse Total Nonrautina Expense Total Expense 5 YTD ~ Balance Budaat Buds~et 4,596.17 11,560.00 4096 1,484.22 3,150.00 47% 4.939.22 14,640.00 3496 11,079.61 29,350.00 SS'4L 88x987.87 733~270D0 3796 a.oo o.oo a% 86.987.97 233,270.00 37% _~~_ t INDIAN KNOLL MANOR 2020 COMMERCE BLVD MOUND, MN 55364 UNPAID INVOICES SORTED BY VENDOR UP TO AND INCLUDING April 30, 2006 April 11, 2006 PAGE: 1 SELECTED DUE VENDOR VENDOR INVOICE INVOICE TO BE CUMULATIVE DATE NUMBER NAME NUMBER AMOUNT PAID TOTAL 04-02-2006 3 PROGRAMMED MANAGEMENT CORP 70326444 47.92 TOTAL DUE 47.92 47.92 03-30-2006 6 WESTPORT PROPERTIES INC MAR06 POSTAGE 29.34 03-30-2006 6 WESTPORT PROPERTIES INC MAR06 MGMT FEE 850.00 04-04-2006 6 WESTPORT PROPERTIES INC APR06 RECURRING 30.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - 909.34 - - - - - - - - - - - - 957.26 - - - - - - - 04-20-2006 20 XCEL ENERGY 51-6383341-8 MAR06 1,344.31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - 1,344.31 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,301.57 - - - - - - - 04-16-2006 34 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV-MOUND 2078853 17.?2 04-16-2006 34 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV-MOUND 3026370 45.80 04-16-2006 34 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV-MOUND 6054977 50.17 04-16-2006 34 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV-MOUND 6121972 16.78 04-19-2006 34 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERV-MOUND MAINT SUPPLYS 3.12 TOTAL DUE 133.59 2,435.16 04-18-2006 36 STS FLOORING INC 42957 707.48 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - 707.48 - - - - - - - - - - - - 3,142.64 - - - - - - - 03-30-2006 56 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 8000012941-3 MAR06 2,903.00 04-28-2006 56 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 8000012941-3 APR06 2,903.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - - 5,806.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 8,948.64 - - - - - - - 04-07-2006 101 C NABER AND ASSOCIATES 35143 MAR06 103.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - - 103.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 9,051.64 - - - - - - - 04-30-2006 102 MOUND TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 860248 .50 04-30-2006 102 MOUND TRUE VALUE HARDWARE X08466 27.97 04-30-2006 102 MOUND TRUE VALUE HARDWARE X08494 19.47 04-30-2006 102 MOUND TRUE VALUE HARDWARE X08640 14.99 " 04-30-2006 102 MOUND TRUE VALUE HARDWARE X08830 10.98 ~~ `~ 04-30-2006 102 MOUND TRUE VALUE HARDWARE X09081 3.79 _11_ INDIAN KNOLL MANOR 2020 COMMERCE BLVD MOUND, MN 55364 UNPAID INVOICES SORTED BY VENDOR UP TO AND INCLUDING April 30, 2006 April 11, 2006 PAGE: 2 SELECTED DUE VENDOR VENDOR INVOICE INVOICE TO BE CUMULATIVE DATE ---------------------- NUMBER ------------- NAME ------------------------- NUMBER AMOUNT PAID TOTAL 04-30-2006 102 ---------- MOUND TRUE VALUE HARDWARE ---------------------- X09132 ------------------------ 12.99 --------------- TOTAL DUE 90.69 9,142.33 03-26-2006 105 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 23083554 52.27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - - 52.27 - - - - - - - - - - - 9,194.60 - - - - - - - 04-30-2006 107 THE LAKER MAR06 ADS 624.74 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - - 624.74 - - - - - - - - - - - 9,819.34 - - - - - - - 03-30-2006 111 CINGULAR/AT&T WIRELESS 13225982 MAR06 6.53 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - - 8.53 - - - - - - - - - - - 9,827.87 - - - - - - - 03-30-2006 118 MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC HOUSING 06 2ND CONSOLIDATED 27.92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - - 27.92 - - - - - - - - - - - 9,655.79 - - - - - - - 04-16-2006 125 IKON FINANCIAL SERVICE - LEASE 68805500 139.38 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - - 139.38 - - - - - - - - - - - 9,995.17 - - - - - - - 04-20-2006 134 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 2116-2 272.53 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - - 272.53 - - - - - - - - - - - 10,267.70 - - - - - - - 03-30-2006 139' STA-SAFE LOCKSMITHS CO 16401 20.00 03-30-2006 139 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITHS CO 16476 48.10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - - 68.10 - - - - - - - - - - - 10,335.80 - - - - - - - 04-16-2006 90010 WASTE TECHNOLOGY INC 97169 273.77 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - - 273.77 - - - - - - - - - - - 10,609.57 - - - - - - - 02-25-2006 90011 IDCSERVCO 10608530 965.80 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL DUE - - - - - - - - - - - - 965.80 - - - - - - - - - - - 11,575.37 - - - - - - - - ~ L' 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: April 18, 2006 Re: Overview -Transit District Parking Deck Summary. The HRA will receive a presentation regarding the Transit District parking deck project at its April 25, 2006 meeting. Members of Staff and the proposed project team will be present to discuss the project. Project History and Overview. Members of the City Council may recall that the construction of a parking facility in the Transit District was depicted in the 2000-2001 Downtown Concept Plan. Specifically, the need for a parking facility was deemed to be necessary to accommodate both existing uses and future needs associated with the redevelopment in the east comer of the property commonly refer-ed to as the "Mueller-Lansing site" (ML.) Proposed Design. The current design, as proposed, includes a 126-stall facility which includes 50 spaces on the upper floor to be designated for Park and Ride use. The project also includes bus lanes, pedestrian facilities, signage, a transit station and permanent location for the farmers market. Council members are advised that the architectural /structural appurtances previously included for the farmer's market have been removed from the project due to budget constraints. Transit Oriented Development Grant. As the City Council is aware, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners awarded the City of Mound a $1 M Transit Oriented Development (TOD) grant to assist with project funding. Favorable components of the parking deck, as noted by the County, were its proximity to housing in and around the downtown area, the inclusion of a transit station and designated stalls for Park and Ride use. Members of the Council are advised the grant agreement with Hennepin County states that the project must be completed by June 2007 or grant funding will be lost. Parking Demand Study. A parking study for the area was undertaken by Walker Parking and SRF Consulting (on behalf of Hennepin County) to determine and confirm the parking demand within the subject site and surrounding area. According to the report, 126-spaces was determined to be the appropriate size as it accommodates both existing demand and future needs associated with the east property (M/L site.) Members are advised that Teny Haakala of Walker Parking and Mike Monahan of SRF Consulting will be present at the 4/25 HRA meeting and will provide an overview of the parking study and proposed deck design/sizing. -13- Project Budget and Financing. A copy of the proposed project budget dated March 27, 2006 has been included. Additionally, a memo from the Sid Inman, the City's Financial Consultant, which explains the financing of the project has also been included. Mr. Inman will also be present at the 4/25 HRA meeting. Public Agency Partners. In addition to the $1 M grant from Hennepin County, the City has also received a financial commitment from Metro Transit in the amount $200K to assist with the funding of the restrooms and bus lanes. Additionally, the project is also included in the MCWD /City innovative stormwater funding agreement. Lastly, the MPCA, through the Brownsfield grant program, paid for the Phase II environmental testing in 2004 in the Transit District and may assist with funding of the Development Response Action Plan (DRAP.) Transit District Owners. Staff wishes to affirm that input from the involved downtown property owners and businesses is integral to this project and Staff has attempted to keep the involved owners up to date with regard to the proposal and recently met with Bruce and Patty Dodds regarding the parking deck and also has extended an invitation to the Mike Mueller, Sr. Staff anticipates detailed discussions with the property owners and other interested parties as the project moves forward. General Comments. It is important to mention that this project is very important to Hennepin County Commissioner Penny Steele as it is the first project in her district which has been provided grant funding and she is very excited to see it come to fruition. Additionally, in an attempt to "get the project up and going," Hennepin County awarded the City more dollars than were originally requested due to Commissioner Steele's strong support for the project especially because no TIF dollars were being used. • The availability to incorporate a transit station and Park and Ride stalls is also important as it satisfies the City's obligation with Metro Transit to replace the Park and Ride stalls which were lost due to the CSAH 15 reconstruction and relocation of the transit station from the Auditor's Road District. • Members of the Council are advised that the relocation of the historic well from the Auditor's Road District for reuse as the transit station is an important component of the project. • Page 2 -14- • The opportunity to expand the deck, to accommodate future P/R needs is presently being evaluated by Mound and Metro Transit staff. Additionally, the option of "oversizing" the structural components of the facility so as to build another level(s) at a future date is being considered as a possible bid-alternate. • The most pressing issue, at present, is to get the project underway, including the preparation of plans and specifications, so as to get in the ground by late summer so as to meet the June 2007 project deadline. Other activities currently in play include the transfer of property associated with the CSAH 15 road project and a proposed property swap with the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority both of which are currently being worked on by City and Hennepin County staff. It is important to future note that the HCRRA proposed property swap will also provide the necessary property to accommodate the future building site on the east side of the Transit District. • The redevelopment of the ML site cannot proceed unless the parking deck moves forward. • The staging of construction in the Transit_ District will need to be sensitive to the adjacent uses especially with regard to access for Dodd's True Value. • The opportunity and financial feasibility to include a "green roof' on the upper floor of the facility is being considered and evaluated in cooperation with the MCWD. Other unique and/or innovative stormwater treatment strategies are also being pursued. Funding assistance for these components, as previously stated, would be eligible for funding reimbursement from the MCWD. • ~ Walker Parking has suggested that the City evaluate its current parking stall size and parking requirements and consider amending its zoning code. Requested Action. A contract from Walker Parking for professional services for facility design and preparation of plans and specifications is forthcoming and will be available at the meeting for review/consideration/action, if not before. Members of the Council are advised SRF Consulting Group, STS and HKGI will be working as sub- consultants on the project. • Page 3 -15- .-. April 12, 2006 To: Kandis Hanson -City of Mound Carlton Moore - City of Mound Sarah Smith - City of Mound Gino Businaro - City of Mound CC: John Dean -Kennedy and Graven Steve Bubul -Kennedy and Graven Bruce Chamberlain -Hand K From: Sid Inman -Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Rebecca Kurtz -Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Dave Callister -Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Subject: Parking Ramp Financing Date: 04-11-2006 You have asked Ehlers & Associates to look into the methods for financing the proposed parking ramp in the downtown transit district. As we have discussed, since the City is not intending to assess any of the cost to property owners, you cannot use your General Obligation Taxing Authority as credit for the bonds. The alternative to your General Obligation is to issue a Limited Pledge Tax Revenue Bond and pledge funds from another source to pay the annual debt service. It is our understanding that the HRA currently has an annual tax levy of around $135,000 to $138,000. It is our understanding that it may be willing to consider this as the source of annual payment for these bonds. We provided this information to an investment banker. Based on their review using current. rates, the HRA could pledge $130,000 of its annual tax levy to a 20 year Limited Pledge Tax Revenue Bond, and it would provide net proceeds for construction of the ramp in the amount of around $1,378,000. It is our understanding that this item will be discussed at an HRA meeting on April 25, 2006. We will have a member of our staff there to discuss this item further and answer any question you may have. -16- n 6 y y a Q G V S m ~ H ~ N. O' q. ~ ~ ~ N N L'S n N f~q ~ ~ d ~. 3 O » O y ~p N O (p O C O N ~ D a f~i 3. ~ ~. > f > N N z ~. [) ~ < bi n ~ 4 ' a ~ c y ~ S . ~ ~ ~ m v W ~ O ~• ~ ~ ' m ? m o x = a • ~ H ~ .~+ N ~ d C N J ~ _ N N a N ~ d ~ ~ O 3 '`~ ~' c m 0~ 3 ~ ~ ~ y o v m m y ~ ~ i ~ ~ n m ~ c m ~ ~ n O Q ~ d ~ n' N n o ' ~ ~ c O~ . ~ ' A O u, o ~ 3 Ci c j N c ,o a ~ g ~ o H ~ , a ~ I ~ Oo N D 0 CT o e ~ T r In r CA r Vl r fn r (A r f~ r f~ r N r (A r (D r Vi Vl _ ~ fd C 7 M N V N Oo N N N A N CT N 61 N OD fA V N N fA OD fA O N -+ ~ C N O O O O Ui O 01 tT O O tll O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O c7 o o O O n (D "~' yw W ~' A w W N N N V 'oNi N N O N O N O N N N N V +° N N O ~ oo O ~ iI C ( jl O O It _C .f l1 O ~ o o o a o S o o S o $ 8 g o S a - ~ ~ ' ; N N Q w ~ ~ o ~ c an rn w o 0 o a . V ~ m C O (7i C It O O ~ o O ~ ~ N Q y W O E A di fA Ep = N O ~ J A N U fVi~ fj T N V V O O O O f D ~ vi cn o ° ~ ~ 0 0 o a m c N N N N N N N ~' ~ ~ 0 0 cn ,..~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 N rn ° ~ a 0 0 0 ~ o i, c O rp N ° ~ i o ~ o °o °o o° °o °o o° °o °o .~. ~ ~ ~ N fn N ~ 7 a c7 v ~ s o o a m Z ' ~ C O 00 O O O O oO O ( / • • ~ ~ O O S ~ ~ d O d R G V/ N W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f0'1 O O O p C1 ~~ y a m $ o O ~ ~ ~ O o O O pj N N n y N 4 d N .a W te C ~ ~ N N N til ~ O O O O ~ r~ O O ~ O p 00 n y fR fA N fA 69 N N O 69 W N N N N N ifl N N o O d . ~ ~ N 0 0 ~ _17_ RAMP CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGS ~ series of conceptual drawings has be'~completcd by Walker Parking Consultants as pout of this study. Due to site constrictions, the most efficient ramp can only a~~commodate 126 spaces. If an additional level is constructed, the cost will rise significantly, and the space count will increase by approximately 56 spaces per level. A s~~ggested action would be to construct the 126 spaces and monitor the effectiveness of tl~e ramps supply serving the area. If the supply proves to be insufficient, the feasibility o~~ adding an additional level can be explored. 7 he conceptual drawings completed. by Walker Parking along with conceptual drawings ~ c?~- a potential "green roof" area for the ramp are presented in Appendix D. CONCLUSIONS ~ n parking study was completed for the Mound I-Iarbor Renaissance Project. 'I'o complete this study, an inventory of existing conditions was completed. Land use quantities, p:~rking supply, and parking utilization were used to develop a special parking model. 'I lle parking model represents the worst case scenario in teens of the highest amount of p irking demand. 7 he model was used with the future build conditions as land use inputs. Any shortfalls m s~~pply would be accommodated in a new municipal ramp to be built within the study a~ ea. This ramp would also have an additional SO spaces for a park and ride to be used by 1\~letro Transit patrons. The remainder of the ramp will serve a new office and retail b~~ilding, a fanners market, and an existing hardware store. According to the parking model, the minimum supply that needs tc~ be constructed in the ramp is 94 spaces. The future land uses were analyzed in comparison to the City of Mound Zoning Code requirements. The zoning code, which has high requirements for residential and retail s}~ace, predicts a shortfall of over 450 spaces for the study area. With some modest reductions in requirements for retail and residential land use, the total supply needed for the area is 156 spaces. T'he parking ramp should be constructed to accommodate a minimum of 94 spaces. If at all possible the ramp should have a capacity approaching 150 spaces to guarantee s~-fficient parking for the study area. Cut~rent conceptual drawings indicate that 1.26 spaces is the most efficient number of spaces that can be constructed in the proposed parking facility. It is recommended that a ramp of 126 spaces, that could be expanded (56 spaces per full level) be constructed. The usage and area parking demand can be monitored to determine if 126 spaces is adequate. If not, then steps can be taken to add an additional level of parking supply. City of Mound Parking Study Page 10 December 2005 -19- .._..,c,~o~D Master Plan n Koegler Group Inc. JWLY, 'LUUb -21- ~ Overview -~:.. -:, City of Mound is conducting major downtow "`~~~ '' ~~ that has gained broad recognition, won seve - ~--~~^ ~~, awards and secured significant grant funds ,, ~ ~ including FWATEA21, Metropolitan Council County ERF & REPP. ~: _, ~ ~ '~ As part of its downtown redevelopment effort,°' ~ ~ , *~ - - // ~ Mound is developing a transit facility to incluc~ - k .r &~ o Restored wellhouse as transit shelte~«~ ~ -'~`-~ ~ ~~"~~, - \ rail corridor ;~, ~a,a,~ ~ /r o ~~h, _ ~~ __ ~ -~8=car dedtcatedl~Fetr~-Transit park l ;~ . ;1 ~, ~~ -- ,~- - public parking ramp ~:~~>< ~~ ,t na~lal,anar . realoretl WaN Houae o farmers market pavilion " ' _ ~_ •k, o bus lay-over bays ---_'-."`----~--_-_`_` __ _- _ _ . _-~ ~ __ - '~, o innovative stormwater treatment tect " -- - ~~ U • Transit facility improvements are scheduled construction. In • .City and County are collaborating on enviror the Transit District properties. Downtown Mound Area Map Mound Visions Transit District Develo went Concept ~~ P ®® Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc January 26, 205 -22- ~,, ~i~n~ To: Gino Businaro, City of Mound From: Dave Callister Bubject: - Prepayment of Bonded Debt -- Date: April 17, 2006 & ASSt3C1ATES f1dC I spoke with Councilmember John Beise recently regarding the concept ofpre-payment of additional principal each year against outstanding bonded debt. As I understand it, Coucilmernber Beise's question was "Can the City pre-pay principal on its existing bonded debt and reduce interest costs and the term of the debt?" The theory is similar to a homeowner paying an additional $100 per month towards the principal payment resulting in lower interest costs and a reduction in the term of the mortgage. The municipal bond market operates differently than the home mortgage market in a number of ways. • Normally, a home mortgage is held by one financial institution whereas a municipal bond is held, in denominations of $5,000, by numerous individuals and institutional entities. • Bondholders trade in the secondary markets. • Bonds are usually pre-payable after the first ten years. • Bonds are most frequently called by maturity. The concept of accelerating principal payments to reduce the term of the bond is not a normally accepted practice because of the many bondholders and the difficulty in identifying and choosing which bondholders will be paid off early. While this type of product may be legally possible, as a practical matter it is not done and the existing municipal bond market is not likely to accept this product unless there is demand from municipal issuers. If such a product were offered it is likely there maybe additional costs including higher interest rates due to investors demanding a higher return for the risk of prepayment at any time. , 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, MN 55 1 13-1 105 651-697-8553 Fax: (651) 697.8555 dcallister®ehlers-inc. com http://www.ehlers-inc.com -23- Alternatively, there is nothing preventing the City from setting aside budgeted funds or reserve funds in a special fund until a particular bond's call date. Under this scenario, the investment and monitoring of these funds on a regular basis is crucial. Another approach could be to set aside funds on an annual basis, utilizing any fund balance above the city's policy, and setting these funds aside for early retirement of outstanding debt. If the City is considering such a concept, I would recommend that your most recent debt study be updated to give you a complete picture of your outstanding debt. I am planning to attend the Apri125`~ FiKA meeting to answer any questions on this issue or any others that you may have. ...._..._~~.,_.~....___~.._....__....,..__..,.~.~._~........ - -_,.~_......_.._......_._~._.~...______..w._....,_-.~ 3060 Centre Pointe Drive 651-697-8553 Fax: (651) 697-8555 Roseville, MN 55113-1105 dcallister@ehlers-inc.com http://www.eh lers-inc. com -24-