1993-01-26January 26, 1993
MINUTE~ - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - J/%NU/%RY 26, 1993
The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in
regular session on Tuesday, January 26, 1993, in the Council
Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City.
Those present were: Mayor Skip Johnson, Councilmembers Andrea
Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Ken Smith. Also present
were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark,
City Attorney Jim Larson, City Planner Mark Koegler, city Engineer
John Cameron, Building official Jon Sutherland and the following
interested citizens: Kirby Ellingson, David Needham, Barbara
Needham Miller, Nicole Raze, John Petersen, Peter Meyer, Paul
Henry, Harvey Berquist, John Edewaard, K. Ellsworth, Frances
Johnson, Bill Feehan, Mark Saliterman, Sara & Brad Biermann, Jean
Robinson, Orv & Pam Osgood, Troy Reye, Harold Meeker, Nancy Clough,
Marnie & Gary Schaefer, Edward Peterson, Hollis Williford, Tom
Casey, Glenn Melena, Richard & Diane Maloney.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance.
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
1.0 MINUTES
MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jensen to approve the
Minutes of the January 12, 1993, Regular Meeting and the
January 19, 1993, Committee of the Whole Meeting, as
submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
1.1 REQUEST FROM SEVENTH GRADE CLASS - OUR LADY OF THE LAKE SCHOOL
- POPULATION SIGN FOR CITY
Renee Blake, stated that her class is petitioning to have the
population of the City reflected on the signs entering the City of
Mound. She stated they are here to see what steps they can take to
see this project completed.
The Council stated they would take this under advisement, finding
out what can be done for each of the entrance signs to have the
population included. The City Manager stated he will advise the
class when this item will be on the Agenda again.
The Council thanked the class.
1.2 PROCLAMATION FOR VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK MARCH 7-14t
1993
Ahrens moved and Jessen seconded the following:
21
January 26, 1993
PROCL2~ATION %93-14 RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MARCH 7-14, 1993, AS VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK IN THE CITY
OF MOUND
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.3
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR A CLASS III RESTAURANT AND BAR FOR "HEADLINERS BAR
& GRILL" IN THE B-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT AT 5241
SHORELINE DRIVE
The Building Official reviewed the request. Staff and the Planning
Commission recommended approval. The suggestion is that.compliance
with the Health Department regulations be required prior to any
occupancy. This application does include a dance floor.
The Building official pointed out that a second letter from the
Health Department, dated January 25, 1993, was handed out this
evening. The Building Official reviewed that letter. He asked
that item 1.A. of the proposed resolution be modified by adding the
following:
Ail code compliance items as required by the Building Official
and all conditions required by Hennepin County are met and
completed prior to any occupancy.
Co
The dumpster enclosure at the rear of the building will be in
conformance with the City Code requirements currently in
effect at this time.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Mayor closed the public hearing.
There were no comments. The
Smith moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution as amended
above:
RESOLUTION %93-15
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A CLASS
III RESTAURANT FOR "HEADLINERS BAR &
GRILL" IN THE B-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS ZONING
DISTRICT AND A PARKING VARIANCE AT 5241
SHORELINE DRIVE LOTS 7 THROUGH 20 AND
LOTS 26 THROUGH 35 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 1,
SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT F, PID %13-117-24 34
0072, P & Z CASE %93-071
22
January 26, 1993
The vote was unanimously in favor. MOtion carried.
1.4 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR AN "ON-SALE"
INTOXICATIN~ LIQUOR LICENSE FOR MARK SALITERMAN& BILL FEEHAN,
DBA HEADLINERS BAR &.GRILL, 5241 SHORELINE DRIVE
The Building Official reported that the background investigation
has been completed and the recommendation is for approval.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. There were no comments.
Mayor closed the public hearing.
The
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Ahrens to authorize the
issuance of an ,,On-Sale', Intoxicating Liquor License and an
"On-Sale" Sunday Liquor License to Headliners Bar & Grill,
Mark Saliterman and Bill Feehan, 5241 Shoreline Drive, when
all insurance and other forms are submitted. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.5 CONSIDERATION OF MISCELLANEOUS LICENSES - HEADLINERS BAR &
~RILL
MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Jessen to authorize
issuance of the following licenses or permits to Headliners
Bar & ~rill, 5241 Shoreline Drive: Restaurant, Cigarette,
Juke Box, Pool Tables, Entertainment, Dinner Dance; when all
insurance and other forms are submitted. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
Councilmember Jessen stated that she has talked with the new
proprietors about keeping the. parking lot cleaned up daily and they
have agreed.
1.6 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FROM RESIDENTS RE: TEAL POINTE
DEVELOPMENT
The Mayor stated that the neighbors have expressed an interest in
keeping this land from being developed and have asked the Council
what can be done as far as acquiring the property. He explained
that the City does not have the resources to go out and buy the
property. The Staff has put together some numbers of costs if a
group of 50 people in that neighborhood agreed to an assessment to
purchase that property for a park. He reviewed two scenarios.
Each depicted a $1000 assessment for 15 years, one at 8% interest
and another at 6% interest. Respectively they are $2.93/$1,000 the
1st year and $2.53/$1,000 the first year. At this point we do not
have a purchase price.
Someone asked how many households there are in Mound.
answered 3200.
The Mayor
23
January 26, 1993
Councilmember Jensen explained that the costs above do not include
any closing costs, administrative costs, etc. That could be the
City's contribution.
Barbara Needham Miller asked if the remainder of the City could be
assessed for this acquisition. The Mayor explained that to spread
this cost to anyone outside the area would be very difficult
because you have to prove benefit to their property.
Harold Meeker stated that he has spoken to Dr. Jim Smith, Supt. of
Westonka Schools and they are interested in keeping the property as
a nature area. Mr. Meeker asked that this be delayed until they
can regroup.
Tom Casey, stated he would like to say a few things about the City
and nature conservation areas. He stated he did not think the
benefit to the community should be defined as who is going to use
the property, but there are protection values by preserving that
land even if no one walks on it and there are some issues that need
to be addressed in terms of actual use of any property that we have
in parks. That's wi%at the nature conservation area program was
designed to talk about and that is what is the level of use that's
necessary to preserve the habitat we have left in Mound. So if you
look at use, you will not have a lot of people using the property,
by virtue of them being far away and by virtue of the delicacy of
the land. He maintained, on behalf of the neighbors, that it is in
the best interest of the City to preserve its land. He stated this
is a chance to sit down and work out this problem. There are
several possibilities, the school board, park dedication funds,
there might be interest in the community for a referendum. He
asked that the Council hold off on passing this for a couple of
weeks to give them time to get the neighbors together; find out
what the numbers are from Mr. Weber; find out the City's interest;
find out the School District's interest; and work together to see
if this land can be saved, because once it's gone and it's
developed it is gone forever. They would like to know in detail
what the City discretionary funds are and contingency funds so that
they, as an educated community, can suggest to the City what they
would like to have this money spent for, instead of another
building, etc.
David Needham, 5954 Lynwood Blvd., presented a letter written by
his Mother. Before a final decision is made we need to let the
public as a whole get involved, and the people here that are
concerned, be given a chance for other solutions or more feasible
alternatives to this.
Laurie Robinson, Windsor Road, - What is the price of this land?
Since Mr. Weber basically bought the property for back taxes, is
there any way to keep him from raising the price up to $200,000?
24
January 26, 1993
The City Attorney stated that there is no liability because Mr.
Weber brought the property for back taxes. Mr. Weber is the owner
at this point.
Glenn Melena - 5139 Windsor, stated he would like to see the time
extended.
Barbara Miller - complained that she only got notice of this on
December 30th and that is too short a time to deal with this big
issue.
The Mayor stated that the City does its best to let people know
what is going on, i.e. agendas in the newspaper, the press puts
articles in the newspapers.
There was a question of how much the City would gain in taxes if
this property is developed. The Council stated they are not
considering this to increase tax base. Further that when houses
are built, they require services so it is kind of a break even.
Harold Meeker, asked for some kind of guarantee on the retaining
walls that may be installed along Windsor Road. The Engineer
stated that the retaining walls would have to meet the engineering
criteria.
Tom Casey, stated they hope this resolution is tabled for a couple
of weeks. In case it is not tabled, he stated he had some further
comments on the proposed resolution.
Peter Meyer, Sunset Road - asked that the item be tabled.
1.7 RESOLUTION REGARDING TEAL POINTE DEVELOPMENT. BLOCKS 10, 11,
15 & 16, WHIPPLE, PID ~25-117-24 12 0225, 0118, 0119, 0120.
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA, & VARIANCE
The City Planner stated that the proposed resolution was prepared
containing conditions that address the points that were raised at
the last meeting.
The Mayor asked if Mr. Weber would come forward to see if there is
any interest on his part in having the land purchased. The Mayor
asked if it would be possible to table this to the first meeting in
February. Mr. Weber stated that he has gone through the
subdivision process for quite a while to get to this point. The
concept of purchase of the land, they are very amenable to, very
willing to discuss, and are interested in seriously talking about
it. If the city is interested in facilitating discussion on a
purchase, they are very interested in participating. If it is in
the best interest of the City that this land be kept the way it is
then they would support that. He stated the process needs to be
25
January 26, 1993
underway. He stated that there was a piece of property in Hopkins
that was recently purchased by that community from a developer in
a similar situation (a townhouse development). The City of Hopkins
loaned the several residents the money. The money to the developer
came from the City however, it was set up as a loan to a community
organization (association). He stated he thought there were 4
individuals that became the association. The reason was that then
those individuals contribute money to the association which repays
the loan. That makes their money that they have contributed tax
deductible as opposed to an assessment which is not. The 4
individuals have signed some kind of agreement that says that if
they default on the loan it automatically becomes an assessment
against their property.
Mr. Weber further stated that, as a developer, they would be able
to take a discount on the property as well. Then the developer
would also get a tax deduction.
Mr. Weber stated that the land value would be as follows:
9 Lots and develop houses at between $150,000 to $180,000.
Generally mortgage companies will take the land value of that
kind of home from 25%-30%. If you take 25%, that is $37,500
to $45,000/ per lot. That is a ready to build lot. That
would put the price at $357,000 to $405,000, minus the costs
of improvements, i.e., streets, storm sewer, water, sewer,
lift station, access road. That could bring the cost down to
the $200,000 range.
Another way to look at this would be to say, "What does the
developer have into the land as costs?" and "What is it worth
while for him to receive for that investment?", which is a
negotiated item. Mr. Weber stated he cannot tell what that is
right now.
He stated they are perfectly willing to look at that.
Mr. Weber stated that what they are concerned about is that the
proposed resolution has a long list of things to be completed
before it is approved. Mr. Weber stated that this resolution is
approving a preliminary plat contingent upon a whole laundry list
of items. The EAW alone will take a least 60 days, probably closer
to 90 or 120 days to complete. The EAW will address the majority
of the concerns expressed regarding, run-off, wildlife, mature
trees, etc.
The Mayor stated that his idea of suspending action at this point
for two weeks, will save the Teal Pointe Development Co. money that
they then would have to add to the purchase price.
26
January 26, 1993
Mr. Weber expressed concern that this suspension of two weeks will
lead into more delays. He' wanted to continue forward while
negotiations are going on.
The City Attorney stated that when all items in the preliminary
plat approval are completed and approved, Mr. Weber then has the
right to demand a final approval and if the Council hasn't acted on
that request for final approval within 60 days of the request
itself then as a matter of law the approval becomes final.
The City Attorney pointed out that everyone needs to understand the
timing of this, i.e. when the application was actually made because
under the statute, a subdivision application shall be preliminarily
approved or disapproved within 120 days following delivery of an
application completed in compliance with the municipal ordinance.
So the Staff should figure out when the 120 days is up. In any
event, if there is going to be a delay the City needs Mr. Weber to
agree that the process be delayed two weeks so that the 120 day
clock does not start to run.
The Planner stated that the key is when the City had a complete
application, when all the things were addressed so we cannot go
back and simply look at the initial application date. That date
should be attainable. He agreed with the Attorney that the owner
should agree or request suspending that for the 2 week period.
Then after that period the 120 day clock would start again.
The Mayor asked what the pleasure of the Council is.
Councilmember Jensen stated that in an ideal world the property
would be kept as open space. She further stated that she has not
spoken with anyone, except Mr. Meyer, who doesn't live near the
site who has said acquire the property. Other residents are not
interested in the purchase of a private park. On the other hand,
if there is a way that the City can facilitate keeping that space
open, she is more than willing to participate in that effort. If
there is a way for the City to finance it internally, that would be
fine, but if it-will not work then the City can still assess it
back to people. In terms of the proposed resolution, she had some
real problems with some of the things that are written it, so she
would like to see some changes before she would vote for it. She
stated she would not vote for the resolution as written. She
stated that the Staff did'a wonderful job of trying to capture what
was said but some very vague things were said and there are some
generalities that we need to make more specific. If the City and
the residents cannot keep this space open then the development
needs to be done right..
Councilmember Smith stated that he cannot see delaying the
resolution to wait for an offer. He stated he is perfectly willing
27
January 26, 1993
to help the people find a way to buy the property, if that is their
intention.
Councilmember Jessen agreed, but stated there is a lot of work to
be done in 2 weeks.
The Council then discussed the resolution.
Councilmember Jensen stated the following .concerns: Page 336, the 5th Whereas is too general.
Page 336, the 6th Whereas, replace with "Whereas, with
variances associated with extending Windsor Road
provide a street as wide as the current Windsor
Road."
Page 336, the last Whereas, strike it out.
Page 337, 2nd Whereas, replace with "Whereas, the use is
consistent with the existing land use."
Page 338, #4. add the word "Preliminary" to the beginning.
Page 338, #9. This item should have the homeowners
association also address street and private lift
station maintenance and repair.
Page 339, Add #15. Should be a requirement for covenants to
describe the structures and the exterior surfaces
and the designs, especially the design of houses on
Lots 1, 2 and 3.
Also there was concern about the vacation of the streets in
that proposed development. Questions on if after they were
vacated the owner has taken the next legal step to demonstrate
that they belong the Teal Pointe Association. There needs to
be a guarantee in the resolution for this.
The Planner stated that on Page 337, #1, Should read, "A new
preliminary plat drawing shall be prepared and submitted to the
City of Mound. Said drawing shall be generally in conformance with
Exhibit "A" except that .it shall identify the retention of Cobden
Road and Drummond Road west of Cobden as public right-of-way. The
portion of Outlot C lying outside of Cobden Road (as shown on
Exhibit "A") shall be dedicated as public right-of-way."
The Council thanked Councilmember Jensen and agreed to have her
items included.
The Council discussed the fact that if the preliminary plat is
approved and all the conditions are met, the City is tied to the
plat.
The Council asked Mr. Weber if he is willing allow a 2 week
suspension in the subdivision time clock. This will give the Staff
time to incorporate the recommendations from tonight into the
resolution and will also give the residents time to come up with
28
29
January 26, 1993
plan to acquire the property for open space.
Mr. Weber agreed to the 2 week suspension of time and all the
proposed recommendations tonight. In the meantime, he will
continue to negotiate with the neighborhood. He also asked that an
extension be asked for on the EAW.
Mr. Casey reviewed his letter that was submitted this evening and
brought up the following that he felt should be included in the
proposed resolution:
That representative(s) of the opposing neighborhood group
participate in the.EAW. That these representatives be
allowed reasonable access to the property to fulfill the
purposes of the study.
That there be an on-site-study by an archaeologist for
Indian artifacts or mounds.
That the developer be required to dedicate land in lieu
of park dedication fees for a nature conservation area.
That. Ail Home Owners' Association Articles of
Incorporation, bylaws, and protective covenants be
submitted to neighborhood representative(s) for review
and comment.
Se
That the cost of any road changes or improvements to any
part of Drummond or Windsor Road be borne by the
developer only.
e
That the developer provide a bond to the City in an
amount to be determined to protect the City and property
owners from any damages resulting from the overflow of
sanitary or storm sewers adjacent to the project and to
upgrade sewers to handle the increased flowage.
That no retaining walls shall be approved by the City
Engineer until the design has been first reviewed by
adjoining property owners to insure that:
a. access to any part of their property is not in any
way impaired;
b. no additional moisture will collect on their
property; and
c. the use and enjoyment of their property will not be
adversely affected in any other way.
The addition of a conservation easement be recorded on
the property (in favor of the City of Mound and other
owners in the plat of Whipple) that states in substance:
29
January 26, 1993
ae
ee
f.
g.
h.
No tree cutting or trimming except for diseased
trees or when buildings are in jeopardy;
No disturbance of other native flora or fauna;
No fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, shall be
used except to control plants designated as
"noxious" under state law;
No outdoor planting of non-native plants; (except
to be planted in a reasonably sized vegetable
garden);
No motorized access to the property from any public
water;
No dredging of an adjacent public water to benefit
any property owner in the development;
No docks, private or public, shall be allowed in
the development; and
Such other restrictions that will assist in
conserving the native flora and fauna or reduce the
environmental impact of the development.
The developer shall minimize any noise to the community
by building all the houses within one year.
10.
Before the final plat is recorded, the City Council shall
hold a public hearing to determine whether the developer
has complied with all of the conditions in the
preliminary plat.
11.
The developer shall escrow sufficient monies with the
City to insure a clean-up of the property and adjoining
wetlands.
The Council asked questions about the EAW and neighborhood input.
The Planner explained that there are two processes going. One is
that there has been a petition for an EAW and in that case the EQB
makes a determination as to who the responsible governmental unit
(RGU) is. If the City of its own volition requires an EAW, the
City automatically is the RGU and that responsibility does lie with
the City of Mound according to the rules and it cannot be
delegated. The process for doing an EAW is a very public, very
participatory process. In the resolution, the term participation
was used, because the developer or the City in this case can
request information from the developer and does so to minimize its
own costs and therefore the term participant was used that they
(the developer) would be required to supply us with information.
But the responsibility for preparing the document and eventually
approving it lies with the City of Mound and cannot be delegated to
other parties. He further explained that this is a very public
process and open for review to anybody, through the City of Mound,
the EQB, the EQB Monitor (their publication), the Libraries, where
30
January 26, 1993
the document will actually be available. It will be very available
for comment and for input. The Council decided this does not have
to be explained out in t-he proposed resolution.
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Ahrens to direct Staff to
add all of Councilmember Jensen,s recommendations to the
proposed resolution and bring the resolution back in two weeks
for consideration. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
Mr. Weber stated that he has been contacted by his insurance
company and they have asked that no one enter the property without
his permission'in order to limit liability.
RECYCLOTTO WINNER
The Mayor presented Gary Schaefer, 3126 Westedge Blvd. with $100.00
Westonka Dollars for recycling the week of January 19, 1993.
COMMENTS ~ND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
There were none.
1.8 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING= ZONING CODE MODIFICATIONS AND
SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE
The Planner explained that the notice for the original hearing was
very clear that the zoning ordinance was going to change but it was
not clear that this also included shoreland changes. Thus, the
notice has been changed and will be republished to reflect both the
zoning modifications and the shoreland management ordinance. This
will be brought back to the Council for final action on February
23rd.
The Planner reviewed the concern that the Council expressed in
November on lot sizes of new subdivisions. The R-1 would remain
10,000 square feet and the R-2 would remain 6,000 square feet and
any new subdivisions would be the same. He reported that if there
are parcels in the City that are considered improperly zoned, they
should be looked at and rezoned based on land configurations and
neighborhood patterns, etc. This rather than try to set up a two
tier system within the various zoning classifications.
The Planning Commission reviewed this last night and had a few
suggestions. There were as follows:
Page. 10 of the Definitions #75. Lot, Lakeshore. should
read as follows: "A lot abutting public lands, abutting
public waters with the exception of designated parks."
31
January 26, 1993
Page 22, section 350:435, Subd. 7. should read as
follows: "Sheds and other buildings less than 120 square
feet in floor area shall be subject to a 50 foot setback
from the ordinary high water~ line of all lakes. Such
structures shall also be subject to accessory building
setbacks."
Page 24, Section 350:440, subd. 9 should read as follows:
"In residential districts, street frontages created by
the existence of fire lanes having a width not exceeding
15 feet shall be considered side yards or rear yards as
appropriate, subject to aPplicable district setbacks."
The Mayor reopened the public hearing.
Diane Maloney, owner of property in Mound, complimented the
Council on their action.
The Mayor closed the public hearing.
1.9 SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONING CODE HODIFICATIONS AND
SHORELAND ~AGENENT ORDINANCE
MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Ahrens to set February 23,
1993, for a public hearing to consider the Zoning Code
Modifications and the Shoreland.Management Ordinance. The
vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
The Planner stated that at that time there will be a summary
ordinance prepared.
1.10 REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT - PROPOSED STORM
SEWER IMPROVEMENT - COTTONWOOD LANE/DAKOTAR&IL, JOHN CAMERON,
CITY ENGINEER
The City Manager stated that the applicant was not present and he
suggested that this b~ pulled off the agenda to a later date. The
Council agreed.
1.11 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $790,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENTREFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993A
The City Manager explained that this deals with refunding some
bonds that were issued in 1985 for Commerce Place. On October 27,
1985, the City issued $1,800,000 General Obligation Tax Increment
Redevelopment Bonds for the purpose of financing the public
improvement costs associated with the City's Commerce Place
Redevelopment and Tax Increment Financing District. The callable
maturities, 2000 through 2004, totaling $750,000 of principal, are
outstanding at a net interest rate of 8.82%. Based on current
32
January 26, 1993
market conditions it is estimated that these bonds could be
refinanced at a net interest rate of 5.33% providing a net savings
to the City, net of all costs of issuance, of approximately $35,500
with a present value of $22,900, or 17.8% of the interest cost.
The city financial consultant, is recommending that the City
proceed with the sale of a "crossover" refunding bond issue that
would advance refund the 2000 through 2004 maturities of the 1985
Bonds. Crossover refunding, is a mechanism whereby only the
callable bonds of an issue are refinanced at lower interest rates.
The City will continue to pay principal and interest on the non-
callable bonds until the call date of October 1, 1999. At the call
date the escrow account, which is funded primarily from bond
proceeds, matures and pays off the callable bonds. Subsequently,
the City will then start to pay principal and interest on the new
bonds. During the period of time the new bonds are outstanding
until the call date, the escrow account will pay the interest on
those new obligations.
Smith moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION %93-16
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCEAND
SALE OF $790,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX
'INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993A
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.12 RESOLUTION GROUND WATER PLAN
The City Manager reported that Hennepin County, under the State
Dept. of Health, has been given authority to develop a ground water
protection plan. This plan calls for the City to do a number of
mandated items. Some of these items are unreasonable. The City of
Minnetonka developed a resolution and has asked that Mound also
adopt this resolution saying that these plans should be used as
guidelines as development occurs.
Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION . % 93-17
RESOLUTION PROVIDING COMMENTS REGARDING
THE DRAFT HENNEPIN COUNTY GROUND WATER
PLAN
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.13 PAYMENT OF BILLS
MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to authorize the
payment of bills as presente~ On the pre-list in the-mount of
$404,350.15, when funds are available. & roll call vote was
33
January 26, 1993
unanimously in favor.
ADD-ON ITEMS
1.14 BID APPROVAL: 1993, I TON DUMP TRUCK
Two bids were received:
The
Motion carried.
Star West $23,757.74
Monticello Ford Mercury $23,440.00
Staff recommended the Monticello Ford
$23,440.00.
Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following:
RESOLUTION #92-18
Mercury bid of
RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT THE BID OF
MONTICELLO FORD MERCURY, FOR A 1993, 1
TON DUMP TRUCK IN THE AMOUNT OF
$23,440.00 (WITHOUT TAX & LICENSE)
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
1.15 PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION - GAMBLING LICENSE, NORTHWEST
TONKA LIONS - HEADLINERS BAR & GRILL - 524 SHORELINE DRIVE
Ahrens moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution:
RESOLUTION #93-19
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PREMISES PERMIT
APPLICATION FOR NORTHWEST TONKA LIONS FOR
HEADLINERS BAR & GRILL, 5241 SHORELINE
DRIVE
The vote was unanimously in favor.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
Motion carried.
Planning Commission Minutes of January 11, 1993.
The Business/Professional Council of the Chamber will meet on
February 2, 1993, at the Mound VFW, 11:45 A.M. The Police
Chief and I will be there to talk about cross-walks. Please
let me know if you will be able to attend.
LMCD "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet, Thursday, February
11, 1993, 6:15 P.M., Lord Fletcher's of the Lake. Please let
the LMCD know by February 5, 1993, if you plan to attend.
34
De
Ee
Ge
January26, 1993
Invitation to celebrate Wally Clevenger Day at Minnetrista
City Hall, Sunday, January 24, 1993, from 2:00 to 4:30 P.M.,
Program at~2:30 P.M.
Governor Carlson's State of the State Address.
REMINDER: 1993 NLC Congressional-City Conference March 6-9,
Washington, D. C. Please let Pran know as soon as possible if
you plan to attend. The deadline for registration is February
12.
Invitation from Association of Metropolitan Municipalities to
a Reception for State Legislators from the Metropolitan Area
and Metropolitan Council Members, Wednesday, February 10,
1993, 4:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Buffington-Gilbert Rooms - Kelly
Inn - St. Paul - State Capital, St. Anthony at Rice Street.
Please let Linda know by Friday, February 5, 1993, if you plan
to attend.
LMCD Mailings.
MOTION made by Jess.n, seconded by Jensen to adjourn at 10:15
P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
E-~rd J. Shuk~, ~., City Manager
Attest: City Clerk
35
BILLS January 26, 1993
BATCH 2123 $262,436.87
BATCH 3012 141,913.28
TOTAL BILLS $404,350.15