Loading...
1993-01-26January 26, 1993 MINUTE~ - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - J/%NU/%RY 26, 1993 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, January 26, 1993, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Skip Johnson, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Ken Smith. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, City Attorney Jim Larson, City Planner Mark Koegler, city Engineer John Cameron, Building official Jon Sutherland and the following interested citizens: Kirby Ellingson, David Needham, Barbara Needham Miller, Nicole Raze, John Petersen, Peter Meyer, Paul Henry, Harvey Berquist, John Edewaard, K. Ellsworth, Frances Johnson, Bill Feehan, Mark Saliterman, Sara & Brad Biermann, Jean Robinson, Orv & Pam Osgood, Troy Reye, Harold Meeker, Nancy Clough, Marnie & Gary Schaefer, Edward Peterson, Hollis Williford, Tom Casey, Glenn Melena, Richard & Diane Maloney. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 1.0 MINUTES MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jensen to approve the Minutes of the January 12, 1993, Regular Meeting and the January 19, 1993, Committee of the Whole Meeting, as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.1 REQUEST FROM SEVENTH GRADE CLASS - OUR LADY OF THE LAKE SCHOOL - POPULATION SIGN FOR CITY Renee Blake, stated that her class is petitioning to have the population of the City reflected on the signs entering the City of Mound. She stated they are here to see what steps they can take to see this project completed. The Council stated they would take this under advisement, finding out what can be done for each of the entrance signs to have the population included. The City Manager stated he will advise the class when this item will be on the Agenda again. The Council thanked the class. 1.2 PROCLAMATION FOR VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK MARCH 7-14t 1993 Ahrens moved and Jessen seconded the following: 21 January 26, 1993 PROCL2~ATION %93-14 RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MARCH 7-14, 1993, AS VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA WEEK IN THE CITY OF MOUND The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.3 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CLASS III RESTAURANT AND BAR FOR "HEADLINERS BAR & GRILL" IN THE B-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT AT 5241 SHORELINE DRIVE The Building Official reviewed the request. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval. The suggestion is that.compliance with the Health Department regulations be required prior to any occupancy. This application does include a dance floor. The Building official pointed out that a second letter from the Health Department, dated January 25, 1993, was handed out this evening. The Building Official reviewed that letter. He asked that item 1.A. of the proposed resolution be modified by adding the following: Ail code compliance items as required by the Building Official and all conditions required by Hennepin County are met and completed prior to any occupancy. Co The dumpster enclosure at the rear of the building will be in conformance with the City Code requirements currently in effect at this time. The Mayor opened the public hearing. Mayor closed the public hearing. There were no comments. The Smith moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution as amended above: RESOLUTION %93-15 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A CLASS III RESTAURANT FOR "HEADLINERS BAR & GRILL" IN THE B-1 CENTRAL BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT AND A PARKING VARIANCE AT 5241 SHORELINE DRIVE LOTS 7 THROUGH 20 AND LOTS 26 THROUGH 35 INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 1, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT F, PID %13-117-24 34 0072, P & Z CASE %93-071 22 January 26, 1993 The vote was unanimously in favor. MOtion carried. 1.4 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR AN "ON-SALE" INTOXICATIN~ LIQUOR LICENSE FOR MARK SALITERMAN& BILL FEEHAN, DBA HEADLINERS BAR &.GRILL, 5241 SHORELINE DRIVE The Building Official reported that the background investigation has been completed and the recommendation is for approval. The Mayor opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor closed the public hearing. The MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Ahrens to authorize the issuance of an ,,On-Sale', Intoxicating Liquor License and an "On-Sale" Sunday Liquor License to Headliners Bar & Grill, Mark Saliterman and Bill Feehan, 5241 Shoreline Drive, when all insurance and other forms are submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.5 CONSIDERATION OF MISCELLANEOUS LICENSES - HEADLINERS BAR & ~RILL MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Jessen to authorize issuance of the following licenses or permits to Headliners Bar & ~rill, 5241 Shoreline Drive: Restaurant, Cigarette, Juke Box, Pool Tables, Entertainment, Dinner Dance; when all insurance and other forms are submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Councilmember Jessen stated that she has talked with the new proprietors about keeping the. parking lot cleaned up daily and they have agreed. 1.6 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL FROM RESIDENTS RE: TEAL POINTE DEVELOPMENT The Mayor stated that the neighbors have expressed an interest in keeping this land from being developed and have asked the Council what can be done as far as acquiring the property. He explained that the City does not have the resources to go out and buy the property. The Staff has put together some numbers of costs if a group of 50 people in that neighborhood agreed to an assessment to purchase that property for a park. He reviewed two scenarios. Each depicted a $1000 assessment for 15 years, one at 8% interest and another at 6% interest. Respectively they are $2.93/$1,000 the 1st year and $2.53/$1,000 the first year. At this point we do not have a purchase price. Someone asked how many households there are in Mound. answered 3200. The Mayor 23 January 26, 1993 Councilmember Jensen explained that the costs above do not include any closing costs, administrative costs, etc. That could be the City's contribution. Barbara Needham Miller asked if the remainder of the City could be assessed for this acquisition. The Mayor explained that to spread this cost to anyone outside the area would be very difficult because you have to prove benefit to their property. Harold Meeker stated that he has spoken to Dr. Jim Smith, Supt. of Westonka Schools and they are interested in keeping the property as a nature area. Mr. Meeker asked that this be delayed until they can regroup. Tom Casey, stated he would like to say a few things about the City and nature conservation areas. He stated he did not think the benefit to the community should be defined as who is going to use the property, but there are protection values by preserving that land even if no one walks on it and there are some issues that need to be addressed in terms of actual use of any property that we have in parks. That's wi%at the nature conservation area program was designed to talk about and that is what is the level of use that's necessary to preserve the habitat we have left in Mound. So if you look at use, you will not have a lot of people using the property, by virtue of them being far away and by virtue of the delicacy of the land. He maintained, on behalf of the neighbors, that it is in the best interest of the City to preserve its land. He stated this is a chance to sit down and work out this problem. There are several possibilities, the school board, park dedication funds, there might be interest in the community for a referendum. He asked that the Council hold off on passing this for a couple of weeks to give them time to get the neighbors together; find out what the numbers are from Mr. Weber; find out the City's interest; find out the School District's interest; and work together to see if this land can be saved, because once it's gone and it's developed it is gone forever. They would like to know in detail what the City discretionary funds are and contingency funds so that they, as an educated community, can suggest to the City what they would like to have this money spent for, instead of another building, etc. David Needham, 5954 Lynwood Blvd., presented a letter written by his Mother. Before a final decision is made we need to let the public as a whole get involved, and the people here that are concerned, be given a chance for other solutions or more feasible alternatives to this. Laurie Robinson, Windsor Road, - What is the price of this land? Since Mr. Weber basically bought the property for back taxes, is there any way to keep him from raising the price up to $200,000? 24 January 26, 1993 The City Attorney stated that there is no liability because Mr. Weber brought the property for back taxes. Mr. Weber is the owner at this point. Glenn Melena - 5139 Windsor, stated he would like to see the time extended. Barbara Miller - complained that she only got notice of this on December 30th and that is too short a time to deal with this big issue. The Mayor stated that the City does its best to let people know what is going on, i.e. agendas in the newspaper, the press puts articles in the newspapers. There was a question of how much the City would gain in taxes if this property is developed. The Council stated they are not considering this to increase tax base. Further that when houses are built, they require services so it is kind of a break even. Harold Meeker, asked for some kind of guarantee on the retaining walls that may be installed along Windsor Road. The Engineer stated that the retaining walls would have to meet the engineering criteria. Tom Casey, stated they hope this resolution is tabled for a couple of weeks. In case it is not tabled, he stated he had some further comments on the proposed resolution. Peter Meyer, Sunset Road - asked that the item be tabled. 1.7 RESOLUTION REGARDING TEAL POINTE DEVELOPMENT. BLOCKS 10, 11, 15 & 16, WHIPPLE, PID ~25-117-24 12 0225, 0118, 0119, 0120. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA, & VARIANCE The City Planner stated that the proposed resolution was prepared containing conditions that address the points that were raised at the last meeting. The Mayor asked if Mr. Weber would come forward to see if there is any interest on his part in having the land purchased. The Mayor asked if it would be possible to table this to the first meeting in February. Mr. Weber stated that he has gone through the subdivision process for quite a while to get to this point. The concept of purchase of the land, they are very amenable to, very willing to discuss, and are interested in seriously talking about it. If the city is interested in facilitating discussion on a purchase, they are very interested in participating. If it is in the best interest of the City that this land be kept the way it is then they would support that. He stated the process needs to be 25 January 26, 1993 underway. He stated that there was a piece of property in Hopkins that was recently purchased by that community from a developer in a similar situation (a townhouse development). The City of Hopkins loaned the several residents the money. The money to the developer came from the City however, it was set up as a loan to a community organization (association). He stated he thought there were 4 individuals that became the association. The reason was that then those individuals contribute money to the association which repays the loan. That makes their money that they have contributed tax deductible as opposed to an assessment which is not. The 4 individuals have signed some kind of agreement that says that if they default on the loan it automatically becomes an assessment against their property. Mr. Weber further stated that, as a developer, they would be able to take a discount on the property as well. Then the developer would also get a tax deduction. Mr. Weber stated that the land value would be as follows: 9 Lots and develop houses at between $150,000 to $180,000. Generally mortgage companies will take the land value of that kind of home from 25%-30%. If you take 25%, that is $37,500 to $45,000/ per lot. That is a ready to build lot. That would put the price at $357,000 to $405,000, minus the costs of improvements, i.e., streets, storm sewer, water, sewer, lift station, access road. That could bring the cost down to the $200,000 range. Another way to look at this would be to say, "What does the developer have into the land as costs?" and "What is it worth while for him to receive for that investment?", which is a negotiated item. Mr. Weber stated he cannot tell what that is right now. He stated they are perfectly willing to look at that. Mr. Weber stated that what they are concerned about is that the proposed resolution has a long list of things to be completed before it is approved. Mr. Weber stated that this resolution is approving a preliminary plat contingent upon a whole laundry list of items. The EAW alone will take a least 60 days, probably closer to 90 or 120 days to complete. The EAW will address the majority of the concerns expressed regarding, run-off, wildlife, mature trees, etc. The Mayor stated that his idea of suspending action at this point for two weeks, will save the Teal Pointe Development Co. money that they then would have to add to the purchase price. 26 January 26, 1993 Mr. Weber expressed concern that this suspension of two weeks will lead into more delays. He' wanted to continue forward while negotiations are going on. The City Attorney stated that when all items in the preliminary plat approval are completed and approved, Mr. Weber then has the right to demand a final approval and if the Council hasn't acted on that request for final approval within 60 days of the request itself then as a matter of law the approval becomes final. The City Attorney pointed out that everyone needs to understand the timing of this, i.e. when the application was actually made because under the statute, a subdivision application shall be preliminarily approved or disapproved within 120 days following delivery of an application completed in compliance with the municipal ordinance. So the Staff should figure out when the 120 days is up. In any event, if there is going to be a delay the City needs Mr. Weber to agree that the process be delayed two weeks so that the 120 day clock does not start to run. The Planner stated that the key is when the City had a complete application, when all the things were addressed so we cannot go back and simply look at the initial application date. That date should be attainable. He agreed with the Attorney that the owner should agree or request suspending that for the 2 week period. Then after that period the 120 day clock would start again. The Mayor asked what the pleasure of the Council is. Councilmember Jensen stated that in an ideal world the property would be kept as open space. She further stated that she has not spoken with anyone, except Mr. Meyer, who doesn't live near the site who has said acquire the property. Other residents are not interested in the purchase of a private park. On the other hand, if there is a way that the City can facilitate keeping that space open, she is more than willing to participate in that effort. If there is a way for the City to finance it internally, that would be fine, but if it-will not work then the City can still assess it back to people. In terms of the proposed resolution, she had some real problems with some of the things that are written it, so she would like to see some changes before she would vote for it. She stated she would not vote for the resolution as written. She stated that the Staff did'a wonderful job of trying to capture what was said but some very vague things were said and there are some generalities that we need to make more specific. If the City and the residents cannot keep this space open then the development needs to be done right.. Councilmember Smith stated that he cannot see delaying the resolution to wait for an offer. He stated he is perfectly willing 27 January 26, 1993 to help the people find a way to buy the property, if that is their intention. Councilmember Jessen agreed, but stated there is a lot of work to be done in 2 weeks. The Council then discussed the resolution. Councilmember Jensen stated the following .concerns: Page 336, the 5th Whereas is too general. Page 336, the 6th Whereas, replace with "Whereas, with variances associated with extending Windsor Road provide a street as wide as the current Windsor Road." Page 336, the last Whereas, strike it out. Page 337, 2nd Whereas, replace with "Whereas, the use is consistent with the existing land use." Page 338, #4. add the word "Preliminary" to the beginning. Page 338, #9. This item should have the homeowners association also address street and private lift station maintenance and repair. Page 339, Add #15. Should be a requirement for covenants to describe the structures and the exterior surfaces and the designs, especially the design of houses on Lots 1, 2 and 3. Also there was concern about the vacation of the streets in that proposed development. Questions on if after they were vacated the owner has taken the next legal step to demonstrate that they belong the Teal Pointe Association. There needs to be a guarantee in the resolution for this. The Planner stated that on Page 337, #1, Should read, "A new preliminary plat drawing shall be prepared and submitted to the City of Mound. Said drawing shall be generally in conformance with Exhibit "A" except that .it shall identify the retention of Cobden Road and Drummond Road west of Cobden as public right-of-way. The portion of Outlot C lying outside of Cobden Road (as shown on Exhibit "A") shall be dedicated as public right-of-way." The Council thanked Councilmember Jensen and agreed to have her items included. The Council discussed the fact that if the preliminary plat is approved and all the conditions are met, the City is tied to the plat. The Council asked Mr. Weber if he is willing allow a 2 week suspension in the subdivision time clock. This will give the Staff time to incorporate the recommendations from tonight into the resolution and will also give the residents time to come up with 28 29 January 26, 1993 plan to acquire the property for open space. Mr. Weber agreed to the 2 week suspension of time and all the proposed recommendations tonight. In the meantime, he will continue to negotiate with the neighborhood. He also asked that an extension be asked for on the EAW. Mr. Casey reviewed his letter that was submitted this evening and brought up the following that he felt should be included in the proposed resolution: That representative(s) of the opposing neighborhood group participate in the.EAW. That these representatives be allowed reasonable access to the property to fulfill the purposes of the study. That there be an on-site-study by an archaeologist for Indian artifacts or mounds. That the developer be required to dedicate land in lieu of park dedication fees for a nature conservation area. That. Ail Home Owners' Association Articles of Incorporation, bylaws, and protective covenants be submitted to neighborhood representative(s) for review and comment. Se That the cost of any road changes or improvements to any part of Drummond or Windsor Road be borne by the developer only. e That the developer provide a bond to the City in an amount to be determined to protect the City and property owners from any damages resulting from the overflow of sanitary or storm sewers adjacent to the project and to upgrade sewers to handle the increased flowage. That no retaining walls shall be approved by the City Engineer until the design has been first reviewed by adjoining property owners to insure that: a. access to any part of their property is not in any way impaired; b. no additional moisture will collect on their property; and c. the use and enjoyment of their property will not be adversely affected in any other way. The addition of a conservation easement be recorded on the property (in favor of the City of Mound and other owners in the plat of Whipple) that states in substance: 29 January 26, 1993 ae ee f. g. h. No tree cutting or trimming except for diseased trees or when buildings are in jeopardy; No disturbance of other native flora or fauna; No fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, shall be used except to control plants designated as "noxious" under state law; No outdoor planting of non-native plants; (except to be planted in a reasonably sized vegetable garden); No motorized access to the property from any public water; No dredging of an adjacent public water to benefit any property owner in the development; No docks, private or public, shall be allowed in the development; and Such other restrictions that will assist in conserving the native flora and fauna or reduce the environmental impact of the development. The developer shall minimize any noise to the community by building all the houses within one year. 10. Before the final plat is recorded, the City Council shall hold a public hearing to determine whether the developer has complied with all of the conditions in the preliminary plat. 11. The developer shall escrow sufficient monies with the City to insure a clean-up of the property and adjoining wetlands. The Council asked questions about the EAW and neighborhood input. The Planner explained that there are two processes going. One is that there has been a petition for an EAW and in that case the EQB makes a determination as to who the responsible governmental unit (RGU) is. If the City of its own volition requires an EAW, the City automatically is the RGU and that responsibility does lie with the City of Mound according to the rules and it cannot be delegated. The process for doing an EAW is a very public, very participatory process. In the resolution, the term participation was used, because the developer or the City in this case can request information from the developer and does so to minimize its own costs and therefore the term participant was used that they (the developer) would be required to supply us with information. But the responsibility for preparing the document and eventually approving it lies with the City of Mound and cannot be delegated to other parties. He further explained that this is a very public process and open for review to anybody, through the City of Mound, the EQB, the EQB Monitor (their publication), the Libraries, where 30 January 26, 1993 the document will actually be available. It will be very available for comment and for input. The Council decided this does not have to be explained out in t-he proposed resolution. MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Ahrens to direct Staff to add all of Councilmember Jensen,s recommendations to the proposed resolution and bring the resolution back in two weeks for consideration. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Mr. Weber stated that he has been contacted by his insurance company and they have asked that no one enter the property without his permission'in order to limit liability. RECYCLOTTO WINNER The Mayor presented Gary Schaefer, 3126 Westedge Blvd. with $100.00 Westonka Dollars for recycling the week of January 19, 1993. COMMENTS ~ND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT There were none. 1.8 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING= ZONING CODE MODIFICATIONS AND SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE The Planner explained that the notice for the original hearing was very clear that the zoning ordinance was going to change but it was not clear that this also included shoreland changes. Thus, the notice has been changed and will be republished to reflect both the zoning modifications and the shoreland management ordinance. This will be brought back to the Council for final action on February 23rd. The Planner reviewed the concern that the Council expressed in November on lot sizes of new subdivisions. The R-1 would remain 10,000 square feet and the R-2 would remain 6,000 square feet and any new subdivisions would be the same. He reported that if there are parcels in the City that are considered improperly zoned, they should be looked at and rezoned based on land configurations and neighborhood patterns, etc. This rather than try to set up a two tier system within the various zoning classifications. The Planning Commission reviewed this last night and had a few suggestions. There were as follows: Page. 10 of the Definitions #75. Lot, Lakeshore. should read as follows: "A lot abutting public lands, abutting public waters with the exception of designated parks." 31 January 26, 1993 Page 22, section 350:435, Subd. 7. should read as follows: "Sheds and other buildings less than 120 square feet in floor area shall be subject to a 50 foot setback from the ordinary high water~ line of all lakes. Such structures shall also be subject to accessory building setbacks." Page 24, Section 350:440, subd. 9 should read as follows: "In residential districts, street frontages created by the existence of fire lanes having a width not exceeding 15 feet shall be considered side yards or rear yards as appropriate, subject to aPplicable district setbacks." The Mayor reopened the public hearing. Diane Maloney, owner of property in Mound, complimented the Council on their action. The Mayor closed the public hearing. 1.9 SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR ZONING CODE HODIFICATIONS AND SHORELAND ~AGENENT ORDINANCE MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Ahrens to set February 23, 1993, for a public hearing to consider the Zoning Code Modifications and the Shoreland.Management Ordinance. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The Planner stated that at that time there will be a summary ordinance prepared. 1.10 REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT - PROPOSED STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT - COTTONWOOD LANE/DAKOTAR&IL, JOHN CAMERON, CITY ENGINEER The City Manager stated that the applicant was not present and he suggested that this b~ pulled off the agenda to a later date. The Council agreed. 1.11 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF $790,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENTREFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993A The City Manager explained that this deals with refunding some bonds that were issued in 1985 for Commerce Place. On October 27, 1985, the City issued $1,800,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Redevelopment Bonds for the purpose of financing the public improvement costs associated with the City's Commerce Place Redevelopment and Tax Increment Financing District. The callable maturities, 2000 through 2004, totaling $750,000 of principal, are outstanding at a net interest rate of 8.82%. Based on current 32 January 26, 1993 market conditions it is estimated that these bonds could be refinanced at a net interest rate of 5.33% providing a net savings to the City, net of all costs of issuance, of approximately $35,500 with a present value of $22,900, or 17.8% of the interest cost. The city financial consultant, is recommending that the City proceed with the sale of a "crossover" refunding bond issue that would advance refund the 2000 through 2004 maturities of the 1985 Bonds. Crossover refunding, is a mechanism whereby only the callable bonds of an issue are refinanced at lower interest rates. The City will continue to pay principal and interest on the non- callable bonds until the call date of October 1, 1999. At the call date the escrow account, which is funded primarily from bond proceeds, matures and pays off the callable bonds. Subsequently, the City will then start to pay principal and interest on the new bonds. During the period of time the new bonds are outstanding until the call date, the escrow account will pay the interest on those new obligations. Smith moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION %93-16 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCEAND SALE OF $790,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX 'INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1993A The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.12 RESOLUTION GROUND WATER PLAN The City Manager reported that Hennepin County, under the State Dept. of Health, has been given authority to develop a ground water protection plan. This plan calls for the City to do a number of mandated items. Some of these items are unreasonable. The City of Minnetonka developed a resolution and has asked that Mound also adopt this resolution saying that these plans should be used as guidelines as development occurs. Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION . % 93-17 RESOLUTION PROVIDING COMMENTS REGARDING THE DRAFT HENNEPIN COUNTY GROUND WATER PLAN The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.13 PAYMENT OF BILLS MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to authorize the payment of bills as presente~ On the pre-list in the-mount of $404,350.15, when funds are available. & roll call vote was 33 January 26, 1993 unanimously in favor. ADD-ON ITEMS 1.14 BID APPROVAL: 1993, I TON DUMP TRUCK Two bids were received: The Motion carried. Star West $23,757.74 Monticello Ford Mercury $23,440.00 Staff recommended the Monticello Ford $23,440.00. Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following: RESOLUTION #92-18 Mercury bid of RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT THE BID OF MONTICELLO FORD MERCURY, FOR A 1993, 1 TON DUMP TRUCK IN THE AMOUNT OF $23,440.00 (WITHOUT TAX & LICENSE) The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.15 PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION - GAMBLING LICENSE, NORTHWEST TONKA LIONS - HEADLINERS BAR & GRILL - 524 SHORELINE DRIVE Ahrens moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #93-19 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION FOR NORTHWEST TONKA LIONS FOR HEADLINERS BAR & GRILL, 5241 SHORELINE DRIVE The vote was unanimously in favor. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS Motion carried. Planning Commission Minutes of January 11, 1993. The Business/Professional Council of the Chamber will meet on February 2, 1993, at the Mound VFW, 11:45 A.M. The Police Chief and I will be there to talk about cross-walks. Please let me know if you will be able to attend. LMCD "Save the Lake" Recognition Banquet, Thursday, February 11, 1993, 6:15 P.M., Lord Fletcher's of the Lake. Please let the LMCD know by February 5, 1993, if you plan to attend. 34 De Ee Ge January26, 1993 Invitation to celebrate Wally Clevenger Day at Minnetrista City Hall, Sunday, January 24, 1993, from 2:00 to 4:30 P.M., Program at~2:30 P.M. Governor Carlson's State of the State Address. REMINDER: 1993 NLC Congressional-City Conference March 6-9, Washington, D. C. Please let Pran know as soon as possible if you plan to attend. The deadline for registration is February 12. Invitation from Association of Metropolitan Municipalities to a Reception for State Legislators from the Metropolitan Area and Metropolitan Council Members, Wednesday, February 10, 1993, 4:30 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Buffington-Gilbert Rooms - Kelly Inn - St. Paul - State Capital, St. Anthony at Rice Street. Please let Linda know by Friday, February 5, 1993, if you plan to attend. LMCD Mailings. MOTION made by Jess.n, seconded by Jensen to adjourn at 10:15 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. E-~rd J. Shuk~, ~., City Manager Attest: City Clerk 35 BILLS January 26, 1993 BATCH 2123 $262,436.87 BATCH 3012 141,913.28 TOTAL BILLS $404,350.15